UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

x    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016

OR

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to ________

Commission File Number 000-52004

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF TOPEKA

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Federally chartered corporation	48-0561319
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
One Security Benefit Pl. Suite 100 Topeka, KS	66606
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 785.233.0507

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  x Yes  ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  x  Yes  ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. ¨ Large accelerated filer  ¨ Accelerated filer  x Non-accelerated filer  ¨ Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  ¨ Yes  x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

	Shares outstanding as of
	August 2, 2016
Class A Stock, par value $100 per share	1,754,189
Class B Stock, par value $100 per share	13,250,776

.FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF TOPEKA

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	4
Item 1.	Financial Statements	4
	Statements of Condition	5
	Statements of Income	7
	Statements of Comprehensive Income	9
	Statements of Capital	10
	Statements of Cash Flows	11
	Notes to Financial Statements	13
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	47
	Executive Level Overview	47
	Financial Market Trends	50
	Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates	51
	Results of Operations	51
	Financial Condition	65
	Liquidity and Capital Resources	79
	Risk Management	83
	Recently Issued Accounting Standards	87
	Legislative and Regulatory Developments	87
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	88
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	94
Part II	OTHER INFORMATION	94
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	94
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	94
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	94
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	94
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	94
Item 5.	Other Information	94
Item 6.	Exhibits	95

2

Important Notice about Information in this Quarterly Report

In this quarterly report, unless the context suggests otherwise, references to the “FHLBank,” “FHLBank Topeka,” “we,” “us” and “our” mean the Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka, and “FHLBanks” mean all the Federal Home Loan Banks, including the FHLBank Topeka.

The information contained in this quarterly report is accurate only as of the date of this quarterly report and as of the dates specified herein.

The product and service names used in this quarterly report are the property of the FHLBank, and in some cases, the other FHLBanks. Where the context suggests otherwise, the products, services and company names mentioned in this quarterly report are the property of their respective owners.

Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-looking Statements

The information in this Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include statements describing the objectives, projections, estimates or future predictions of the FHLBank’s operations. These statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “may,” “is likely,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “will,” “intend,” “probable,” “project,” “should,” or their negatives or other variations of these terms. The FHLBank cautions that by their nature forward-looking statements involve risks or uncertainties and that actual results may differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of such risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to:

• Governmental actions, including legislative, regulatory, judicial or other developments that affect the FHLBank; its members, counterparties or investors; housing government sponsored enterprises (GSE); or the FHLBank System in general;

• Changes in the FHLBank’s capital structure;

• Changes in economic and market conditions, including conditions in the U.S. and global economy as well as the mortgage, housing and capital markets;

• Changes in demand for FHLBank products and services or consolidated obligations of the FHLBank System;

• Effects of derivative accounting treatment and other accounting rule requirements, or changes in such requirements;

• The effects of amortization/accretion;

• Gains/losses on derivatives or on trading investments and the ability to enter into effective derivative instruments on acceptable terms;

• Volatility of market prices, interest rates and indices and the timing and volume of market activity;

• Membership changes, including changes resulting from member failures or mergers, changes in the principal place of business of members or changes in the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) regulations on membership standards;

• Our ability to declare dividends or to pay dividends at rates consistent with past practices;

• Soundness of other financial institutions, including FHLBank members, non-member borrowers, counterparties, and the other FHLBanks;

• Changes in the value or liquidity of collateral underlying advances to FHLBank members or non-member borrowers or collateral pledged by reverse repurchase and derivative counterparties;

• Competitive forces, including competition for loan demand, purchases of mortgage loans and access to funding;

• The ability of the FHLBank to introduce new products and services to meet market demand and to manage successfully the risks associated with all products and services;

• The ability of the FHLBank to keep pace with technological changes and the ability to develop and support technology and information systems, including the ability to securely access the internet and internet-based systems and services, sufficient to effectively manage the risks of the FHLBank’s business;

• The ability of each of the other FHLBanks to repay the principal and interest on consolidated obligations for which it is the primary obligor and with respect to which the FHLBank has joint and several liability;

• Changes in the U.S. government’s long-term debt rating and the long-term credit rating of the senior unsecured debt issues of the FHLBank System;

• Changes in the fair value and economic value of, impairments of, and risks associated with, the FHLBank’s investments in mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities (MBS) or other assets and related credit enhancement (CE) protections; and

• The volume and quality of eligible mortgage loans originated and sold by participating members to the FHLBank through its various mortgage finance products (Mortgage Partnership Finance^® (MPF^®) Program). “Mortgage Partnership Finance,” “MPF,” and “MPF Xtra” are registered trademarks of the FHLBank of Chicago.

3

Readers of this report should not rely solely on the forward-looking statements and should consider all risks and uncertainties addressed throughout this report, as well as those discussed under Item 1A – Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, incorporated by reference herein.

All forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q are expressly qualified in their entirety by reference to this cautionary notice. The reader should not place undue reliance on such forward‑looking statements, since the statements speak only as of the date that they are made and the FHLBank has no obligation and does not undertake publicly to update, revise or correct any forward‑looking statement for any reason to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report.

PART I

Item 1: Financial Statements

4

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF TOPEKA
STATEMENTS OF CONDITION - Unaudited
(In thousands, except par value)
	06/30/2016			12/31/2015
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	214,023		$	682,670
Interest-bearing deposits	371,834			100,594
Securities purchased under agreements to resell (Note 10)	2,993,427			3,945,000
Federal funds sold	1,823,000			2,000,000
Investment securities:
Trading securities (Note 3)	2,494,963			2,294,606
Available-for-sale securities1 (Note 3)	1,057,923			495,063
Held-to-maturity securities2 (Note 3)	4,703,442			4,770,817
Total investment securities	8,256,328			7,560,486
Advances (Notes 4, 6)	26,182,562			23,580,371
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net:
Mortgage loans held for portfolio (Notes 5, 6)	6,473,897			6,392,680
Less allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans (Note 6)	(1,298		)	(1,972		)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net	6,472,599			6,390,708
Accrued interest receivable	77,918			79,233
Premises, software and equipment, net	10,489			8,306
Derivative assets, net (Notes 7, 10)	61,747			51,591
Other assets	27,209			27,174
TOTAL ASSETS	$	46,491,136		$	44,426,133
LIABILITIES
Deposits (Note 8)	$	661,355		$	759,366
Consolidated obligations, net:
Discount notes (Note 9)	26,887,678			21,813,446
Bonds (Note 9)	16,753,990			19,866,034
Total consolidated obligations, net	43,641,668			41,679,480
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock (Note 11)	4,356			2,739
Accrued interest payable	43,539			52,281
Affordable Housing Program payable	31,061			28,011
Derivative liabilities, net (Notes 7, 10)	47,963			31,492
Other liabilities	44,423			31,012
TOTAL LIABILITIES	44,474,365			42,584,381
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)

¹    Amortized cost: $1,064,198 and $503,640 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

²    Fair value: $4,695,449 and $4,765,095 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF TOPEKA
STATEMENTS OF CONDITION - Unaudited
(In thousands, except par value)
	06/30/2016			12/31/2015
CAPITAL
Capital stock outstanding - putable:
Class A ($100 par value; 1,879 and 1,797 shares issued and outstanding) (Note 11)	$	187,895		$	179,683
Class B ($100 par value; 11,594 and 10,293 shares issued and outstanding) (Note 11)	1,159,385			1,029,264
Total capital stock	1,347,280			1,208,947
Retained earnings:
Unrestricted	578,978			560,166
Restricted	106,051			91,616
Total retained earnings	685,029			651,782
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (Note 12)	(15,538		)	(18,977		)
TOTAL CAPITAL	2,016,771			1,841,752
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL	$	46,491,136		$	44,426,133

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

6

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF TOPEKA
STATEMENTS OF INCOME - Unaudited
(In thousands)
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016			06/30/2015			06/30/2016			06/30/2015
INTEREST INCOME:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	454		$	55		$	786		$	109
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	2,548			1,013			5,577			1,578
Federal funds sold	1,417			485			2,812			1,144
Trading securities	17,949			13,496			36,130			25,858
Available-for-sale securities	2,797			—			4,819			—
Held-to-maturity securities	11,799			10,221			23,331			20,280
Advances	56,722			33,818			109,921			65,569
Prepayment fees on terminated advances	120			332			609			1,088
Mortgage loans held for portfolio	50,992			50,455			103,293			102,471
Other	314			354			641			706
Total interest income	145,112			110,229			287,919			218,803
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits	234			135			460			299
Consolidated obligations:
Discount notes	24,272			3,751			45,179			7,253
Bonds	56,318			49,121			113,047			97,346
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock (Note 11)	32			11			41			22
Other	74			61			140			119
Total interest expense	80,930			53,079			158,867			105,039
NET INTEREST INCOME	64,182			57,150			129,052			113,764
(Reversal) provision for credit losses on mortgage loans (Note 6)	(212		)	(992		)	(469		)	(1,794		)
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER LOAN LOSS (REVERSAL) PROVISION	64,394			58,142			129,521			115,558
OTHER INCOME (LOSS):
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses on held-to-maturity securities	(1		)	(185		)	(65		)	(185		)
Net amount of impairment losses on held-to-maturity securities reclassified to/(from) accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	(4		)	(67		)	33			(254		)
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses on held-to-maturity securities (Note 3)	(5		)	(252		)	(32		)	(439		)
Net gain (loss) on trading securities (Note 3)	18,526			(20,371		)	67,730			(26,215		)
Net gain (loss) on derivatives and hedging activities (Note 7)	(35,296		)	4,317			(93,782		)	(1,646		)
Standby bond purchase agreement commitment fees	1,332			1,357			2,712			2,838
Letters of credit fees	903			820			1,755			1,609
Other	653			592			1,214			1,100
Total other income (loss)	(13,887		)	(13,537		)	(20,403		)	(22,753		)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

7

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF TOPEKA
STATEMENTS OF INCOME - Unaudited
(In thousands)
	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016		06/30/2015		06/30/2016		06/30/2015
OTHER EXPENSES:
Compensation and benefits	$	8,711	$	8,097	$	16,462	$	16,126
Other operating	4,289		4,266		7,630		7,877
Federal Housing Finance Agency	698		493		1,507		1,108
Office of Finance	640		746		1,352		1,324
Other	941		1,491		1,967		2,278
Total other expenses	15,279		15,093		28,918		28,713
INCOME BEFORE ASSESSMENTS	35,228		29,512		80,200		64,092
Affordable Housing Program	3,526		2,952		8,024		6,411
NET INCOME	$	31,702	$	26,560	$	72,176	$	57,681

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

8

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF TOPEKA
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME - Unaudited
(In thousands)
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016			06/30/2015			06/30/2016			06/30/2015
Net income	$	31,702		$	26,560		$	72,176		$	57,681
Other comprehensive income:
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities:
Unrealized gain (loss)	(2,440		)	—			2,302			—
Total net unrealized gains/losses on available-for-sale securities	(2,440		)	—			2,302			—
Net non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses on held-to-maturity securities:
Non-credit portion	—			(181		)	(62		)	(181		)
Reclassification of non-credit portion included in net income	4			248			29			435
Accretion of non-credit portion	525			789			1,075			1,741
Total net non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses on held-to-maturity securities	529			856			1,042			1,995
Defined benefit pension plan:
Amortization of net loss	48			100			95			198
Total defined benefit pension plan	48			100			95			198
Total other comprehensive income	(1,863		)	956			3,439			2,193
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	$	29,839		$	27,516		$	75,615		$	59,874

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

9

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF TOPEKA
STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL - Unaudited
(In thousands)
	Capital Stock1															Retained Earnings								Accumulated			Total Capital
																								Other
	Class A					Class B					Total													Comprehensive
	Shares		Par Value			Shares		Par Value			Shares		Par Value			Unrestricted			Restricted		Total			Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2014	2,083		$	208,273		7,657		$	765,768		9,740		$	974,041		$	554,189		$	72,944	$	627,133		$	(15,907	)	$	1,585,267
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock	18		1,762			6,825		682,528			6,843		684,290														684,290
Repurchase/redemption of capital stock	(1,970	)	(196,999		)	(58	)	(5,852		)	(2,028	)	(202,851		)												(202,851		)
Comprehensive income																46,145			11,536		57,681			2,193			59,874
Net reclassification of shares to mandatorily redeemable capital stock	(17	)	(1,646		)	(1,813	)	(181,313		)	(1,830	)	(182,959		)												(182,959		)
Net transfer of shares between Class A and Class B	1,530		153,059			(1,530	)	(153,059		)	—		—														—
Dividends on capital stock (Class A - 1.0%, Class B - 6.0%):
Cash payment																(148		)			(148		)				(148		)
Stock issued						310		31,049			310		31,049			(31,049		)			(31,049		)				—
Balance at June 30, 2015	1,644		$	164,449		11,391		$	1,139,121		13,035		$	1,303,570		$	569,137		$	84,480	$	653,617		$	(13,714	)	$	1,943,473
	Capital Stock1															Retained Earnings								Accumulated			Total Capital
																								Other
	Class A					Class B					Total													Comprehensive
	Shares		Par Value			Shares		Par Value			Shares		Par Value			Unrestricted			Restricted		Total			Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2015	1,797		$	179,683		10,293		$	1,029,264		12,090		$	1,208,947		$	560,166		$	91,616	$	651,782		$	(18,977	)	$	1,841,752
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock	25		2,520			6,673		667,293			6,698		669,813														669,813
Repurchase/redemption of capital stock	(2,166	)	(216,635		)	(14	)	(1,409		)	(2,180	)	(218,044		)												(218,044		)
Comprehensive income																57,741			14,435		72,176			3,439			75,615
Net reclassification of shares to mandatorily redeemable capital stock	(199	)	(19,858		)	(3,324	)	(332,362		)	(3,523	)	(352,220		)												(352,220		)
Net transfer of shares between Class A and Class B	2,422		242,185			(2,422	)	(242,185		)	—		—														—
Dividends on capital stock (Class A - 1.0%, Class B - 6.0%):
Cash payment																(145		)			(145		)				(145		)
Stock issued						388		38,784			388		38,784			(38,784		)			(38,784		)				—
Balance at June 30, 2016	1,879		$	187,895		11,594		$	1,159,385		13,473		$	1,347,280		$	578,978		$	106,051	$	685,029		$	(15,538	)	$	2,016,771

¹    Putable

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

10

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF TOPEKA
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - Unaudited
(In thousands)
	Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016			06/30/2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	72,176		$	57,681
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization:
Premiums and discounts on consolidated obligations, net	(279		)	(8,109		)
Concessions on consolidated obligations	6,550			3,081
Premiums and discounts on investments, net	1,039			364
Premiums, discounts and commitment fees on advances, net	(3,204		)	(4,981		)
Premiums, discounts and deferred loan costs on mortgage loans, net	9,171			9,589
Fair value adjustments on hedged assets or liabilities	2,838			5,103
Premises, software and equipment	1,032			1,097
Other	95			198
(Reversal) provision for credit losses on mortgage loans	(469		)	(1,794		)
Non-cash interest on mandatorily redeemable capital stock	37			20
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses on held-to-maturity securities	32			439
Net realized (gain) loss on sale of premises and equipment	(39		)	(17		)
Other adjustments	(386		)	(116		)
Net (gain) loss on trading securities	(67,730		)	26,215
(Gain) loss due to change in net fair value adjustment on derivative and hedging activities	101,902			9,326
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable	1,295			(3,751		)
Change in net accrued interest included in derivative assets	(3,462		)	9,221
(Increase) decrease in other assets	(1,805		)	1,125
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable	(8,746		)	(5,683		)
Change in net accrued interest included in derivative liabilities	537			(4,436		)
Increase (decrease) in Affordable Housing Program liability	3,050			(577		)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities	(2,912		)	(1,704		)
Total adjustments	38,546			34,610
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES	110,722			92,291

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

11

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF TOPEKA
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - Unaudited
(In thousands)
	Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016			06/30/2015
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Net (increase) decrease in interest-bearing deposits	$	(438,106	)	$	10,030
Net (increase) decrease in securities purchased under resale agreements	951,573			(3,735,000		)
Net (increase) decrease in Federal funds sold	177,000			5,000
Net (increase) decrease in short-term trading securities	—			(595,010		)
Proceeds from maturities of and principal repayments on long-term trading securities	260,818			307,579
Purchases of long-term trading securities	(393,445		)	(850,830		)
Proceeds from maturities of and principal repayments on long-term available-for-sale securities	1,206			—
Purchases of long-term available-for-sale securities	(519,528		)	—
Proceeds from maturities of and principal repayments on long-term held-to-maturity securities	374,708			733,430
Purchases of long-term held-to-maturity securities	(291,225		)	(1,090,355		)
Principal collected on advances	62,092,887			43,289,405
Advances made	(64,622,951		)	(48,299,409		)
Principal collected on mortgage loans	468,194			505,390
Purchases of mortgage loans	(558,419		)	(600,645		)
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets	2,719			2,398
Principal collected on other loans made	1,167			1,104
Proceeds from sale of premises, software and equipment	1			44
Purchases of premises, software and equipment	(3,177		)	(186		)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES	(2,496,578		)	(10,317,055		)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase (decrease) in deposits	(119,812		)	(5,188		)
Net proceeds from issuance of consolidated obligations:
Discount notes	265,946,231			142,961,933
Bonds	8,111,112			7,108,089
Payments for maturing and retired consolidated obligations:
Discount notes	(260,877,617		)	(135,675,197		)
Bonds	(11,227,650		)	(6,113,000		)
Proceeds from financing derivatives	14,600			6,066
Net interest payments received (paid) for financing derivatives	(30,639		)	(26,996		)
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock	669,813			684,290
Payments for repurchase/redemption of capital stock	(218,044		)	(202,851		)
Payments for repurchase of mandatorily redeemable capital stock	(350,640		)	(182,966		)
Cash dividends paid	(145		)	(148		)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES	1,917,209			8,554,032
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	(468,647		)	(1,670,732		)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD	682,670			2,545,311
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	214,023		$	874,579
Supplemental disclosures:
Interest paid	$	157,187		$	107,377
Affordable Housing Program payments	$	5,352		$	7,062
Net transfers of mortgage loans to real estate owned	$	627		$	2,277
Traded but not yet settled investment security purchases	$	15,260		$	97,184

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

12

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF TOPEKA

Notes to Financial Statements- Unaudited

June 30, 2016

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Basis of Presentation: The accompanying interim financial statements of the FHLBank are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instruction provided by Article 10, Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. The financial statements contain all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the FHLBank’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments were of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year or any other interim period.

The FHLBank’s significant accounting policies and certain other disclosures are set forth in the notes to the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015. The interim financial statements presented herein should be read in conjunction with the FHLBank’s audited financial statements and notes thereto, which are included in the FHLBank’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 10, 2016 (annual report on Form 10-K). The notes to the interim financial statements highlight significant changes to the notes included in the annual report on Form 10-K.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements under GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions as of the date of the financial statements in determining the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and estimated fair values and in determining the disclosure of any contingent assets or liabilities. Estimates and assumptions by management also affect the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. The most significant of these estimates include the fair value of trading and available-for-sale securities, the fair value of derivatives and the allowance for credit losses. Many of the estimates and assumptions, including those used in financial models, are based on financial market conditions as of the date of the financial statements. Because of the volatility of the financial markets, as well as other factors that affect management estimates, actual results may vary from these estimates.

Reclassifications: Certain amounts in the financial statements and related footnotes have been reclassified to conform to current period presentations. On January 1, 2016, the FHLBank adopted the guidance, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, issued by Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in April 2015. This guidance requires a retrospective reclassification of debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability from other assets to a reduction of the carrying amount of the liability consistent with the presentation of debt discounts. As a result, debt issuance costs of $9,221,000 and $300,000 on consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes, respectively, were reclassified from other assets to consolidated obligations as of December 31, 2015, resulting in a decrease in total assets and total liabilities. The adoption of this amendment did not have an impact on the FHLBank's results of operations or cash flows. See Note 2 - Recently Issued Accounting Standards and Interpretations and Changes in and Adoptions of Accounting Principles for discussion of this guidance.

NOTE 2 – RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND INTERPRETATIONS AND CHANGES IN AND ADOPTIONS OF ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES

Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. In June 2016, FASB issued amended guidance for the accounting of credit losses on financial instruments. The amendments require entities to measure expected credit losses based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. An entity must use judgment in determining the relevant information and estimation methods that are appropriate in its circumstances. Additionally, under the new guidance, a financial asset, or a group of financial assets, measured at amortized cost basis is required to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected.

13

The guidance also requires:

• The statement of income to reflect the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period;

• The entities to determine the allowance for credit losses for purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination that are measured at amortized cost basis in a similar manner to other financial assets measured at amortized cost basis. The initial allowance for credit losses is required to be added to the purchase price;

• Credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities to be recorded through an allowance for credit losses. The amendments limit the allowance for credit losses to the amount by which fair value is below amortized cost; and

• Public entities to further disaggregate the current disclosure of credit quality indicators in relation to the amortized cost of financing receivables by the year of origination (i.e., vintage).

The guidance is effective for the FHLBank for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2020. Early application is permitted as of the interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The guidance should be applied using a modified-retrospective approach, through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. In addition, entities are required to use a prospective transition approach for debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) had been recognized before the effective date. The FHLBank is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact on the FHLBank's financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments. In March 2016, FASB issued amendments to resolve current diversity in practice by clarifying the steps required when assessing whether the economic characteristics and risks of call (put) options are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of their debt hosts, which is one of the criteria for bifurcating an embedded derivative. The amendments apply to all entities that are issuers of or investors in debt instruments (or hybrid financial instruments that are determined to have a debt host) with embedded call (put) options. The amendments are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016, which is January 1, 2017 for the FHLBank. Early adoption is permitted. This guidance is not expected to affect the FHLBank's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships. In March 2016, FASB issued amendments to clarify that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as the hedging instrument under GAAP does not, in and of itself, require dedesignation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met. The amendments are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. The FHLBank elected to early adopt the guidance prospectively on January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance had no effect on the FHLBank’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Leases. In February 2016, FASB issued amendments to lease accounting guidance. Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases in the statement of financial condition, which effectively removes a source of off-balance sheet financing for operating leases. A distinction remains between finance leases and operating leases, but the assets and liabilities arising from operating leases are now also required to be recognized in the statement of financial condition. Lessor accounting is largely unchanged. The amendments are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018, which is January 1, 2019 for the FHLBank. The FHLBank is currently evaluating these amendments to determine the impact, if any, on the FHLBank's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. In January 2016, FASB issued amendments to improve the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments through changes to existing GAAP. The provisions impacting the FHLBank include the elimination of the requirement to disclose the method and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments carried at amortized cost, the requirement to use the notion of exit price when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes, and the separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables) on the statement of financial condition or in the notes to financial statements. The amendments are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, which is January 1, 2018 for the FHLBank. The FHLBank is currently evaluating these amendments to determine the impact, if any, on the FHLBank's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement.In April 2015, FASB issued amendments to clarify the accounting for cloud computing arrangements. The amendments provide guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license and how to account for it. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015, which was January 1, 2016 for the FHLBank. The FHLBank elected to adopt the amendments prospectively to all arrangements entered into or materially modified after the effective date. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the FHLBank's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

14

Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. In April 2015, FASB issued guidance that requires a reclassification of debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability from other assets to a reduction of the carrying amount of the liability consistent with the presentation of debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs did not change as a result of this amendment. The amendments are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015, which was January 1, 2016 for the FHLBank. The period-specific effects as a result of applying this guidance are required to be adjusted retrospectively to each individual period presented on the statement of condition.The adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on the FHLBank's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. In February 2015,FASB issued guidance that impacts reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they must consolidate certain legal entities. Under the amended guidance, in a consolidation evaluation, more emphasis is placed on variable interests other than fee arrangements, such as principal investment risk or guarantees of the value of the assets or liabilities of the variable interest entity. The amendments emphasize risk of loss in the determination of a controlling financial interest and provide a scope exception for reporting entities with interests in legal entities that are required to comply with or operate in accordance with requirements that are similar to those in Rule 2a-7 of the Investments Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds. The amendments are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015, which was January 1, 2016 for the FHLBank. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material impact on the FHLBank's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Revenue Recognition. In May 2014, FASB issued guidance to introduce a new revenue recognition model in which an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance also requires disclosures sufficient to enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers, including qualitative and quantitative disclosures about contracts with customers, significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. In July 2015, FASB voted to defer the effective date of the new standard by one year. Inaddition, in March 2016, FASB issued amendments to clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations, in particular, relating to how an entity should determine whether the entity is a principal or an agent for each specified good or service promised to the customer and the nature of each specified good or services. The amendments do not change the core principle in the new revenue standard. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 (January 1, 2018 for the FHLBank), including interim periods within that reporting period. The FHLBank is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it will have, if any, on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, but any effect is not expected to be material.

NOTE 3 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES

Trading Securities: Trading securities by major security type as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are summarized in Table 3.1 (in thousands):

Table 3.1

	Fair Value
	06/30/2016		12/31/2015
Non-mortgage-backed securities:
GSE obligations1	$	1,493,441	$	1,338,639
Non-mortgage-backed securities	1,493,441		1,338,639
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. obligation MBS2	744		801
GSE MBS3	1,000,778		955,166
Mortgage-backed securities	1,001,522		955,967
TOTAL	$	2,494,963	$	2,294,606

¹  Represents debentures issued by other FHLBanks, Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), Federal Farm Credit Bank (Farm Credit) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (Farmer Mac). GSE securities are not guaranteed by the U.S. government.

²  Represents single-family MBS issued by Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae), which are guaranteed by the U.S. government.

³  Represents single-family and multi-family MBS issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

15

Net gains (losses) on trading securities during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 are shown in Table 3.2 (in thousands):

Table 3.2

	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016		06/30/2015			06/30/2016			06/30/2015
Net gains (losses) on trading securities held as of June 30, 2016	$	18,526	$	(17,674	)	$	68,195		$	(21,001	)
Net gains (losses) on trading securities sold or matured prior to June 30, 2016	—		(2,697		)	(465		)	(5,214		)
NET GAIN (LOSS) ON TRADING SECURITIES	$	18,526	$	(20,371	)	$	67,730		$	(26,215	)

Available-for-sale Securities: Available-for-sale securities by major security type as of June 30, 2016 are summarized in Table 3.3 (in thousands):

Table 3.3

	06/30/2016
	Amortized Cost		OTTI Recognized in OCI		Gross Unrecognized Gains		Gross Unrecognized Losses			Fair Value
Mortgage-backed securities:
GSE MBS1	$	1,064,198	$	—	$	1,562	$	(7,837	)	$	1,057,923
TOTAL	$	1,064,198	$	—	$	1,562	$	(7,837	)	$	1,057,923

¹  Represents fixed rate multi-familyMBS issued by Fannie Mae.

Available-for-sale securities by major security type as of December 31, 2015 are summarized in Table 3.4 (in thousands):

Table 3.4

	12/31/2015
	Amortized Cost		OTTI Recognized in OCI		Gross Unrecognized Gains		Gross Unrecognized Losses			Fair Value
Mortgage-backed securities:
GSE MBS1	$	503,640	$	—	$	—	$	(8,577	)	$	495,063
TOTAL	$	503,640	$	—	$	—	$	(8,577	)	$	495,063

¹  Represents fixed rate multi-familyMBS issued by Fannie Mae.

Table 3.5 summarizes the available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses as of June 30, 2016 (in thousands). The unrealized losses are aggregated by major security type and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.

Table 3.5

	06/30/2016
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Mortgage-backed securities:
GSE MBS1	$	762,592	$	(7,837	)	$	—	$	—	$	762,592	$	(7,837	)
TOTAL TEMPORARILY IMPAIRED SECURITIES	$	762,592	$	(7,837	)	$	—	$	—	$	762,592	$	(7,837	)

¹  Represents fixed rate multi-familyMBS issued by Fannie Mae.

16

Table 3.6 summarizes the available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands). The unrealized losses are aggregated by major security type and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.

Table 3.6

	12/31/2015
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Mortgage-backed securities:
GSE MBS1	$	495,063	$	(8,577	)	$	—	$	—	$	495,063	$	(8,577	)
TOTAL TEMPORARILY IMPAIRED SECURITIES	$	495,063	$	(8,577	)	$	—	$	—	$	495,063	$	(8,577	)

¹  Represents fixed rate multi-familyMBS issued by Fannie Mae.

All available-for-sale securities are GSE MBS and as such do not have a single maturity date. The expected maturities of these securities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment fees.

Held-to-maturity Securities: Held-to-maturity securities by major security type as of June 30, 2016 are summarized in Table 3.7 (in thousands):

Table 3.7

	06/30/2016
	Amortized Cost		OTTI Recognized in OCI			Carrying Value		Gross Unrecognized Gains		Gross Unrecognized Losses			Fair Value
Non-mortgage-backed securities:
State or local housing agency obligations	$	109,590	$	—		$	109,590	$	129	$	(4,908	)	$	104,811
Non-mortgage-backed securities	109,590		—			109,590		129		(4,908		)	104,811
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. obligation MBS1	42,822		—			42,822		6		(70		)	42,758
GSE MBS2	4,412,962		—			4,412,962		14,578		(17,314		)	4,410,226
Private-label residential MBS	144,976		(6,908		)	138,068		5,071		(5,485		)	137,654
Mortgage-backed securities	4,600,760		(6,908		)	4,593,852		19,655		(22,869		)	4,590,638
TOTAL	$	4,710,350	$	(6,908	)	$	4,703,442	$	19,784	$	(27,777	)	$	4,695,449

¹  Represents single-family MBS issued by Ginnie Mae, which are guaranteed by the U.S. government.

²  Represents single-family and multi-family MBS issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

17

Held-to-maturity securities by major security type as of December 31, 2015 are summarized in Table 3.8 (in thousands):

Table 3.8

	12/31/2015
	Amortized Cost		OTTI Recognized in OCI			Carrying Value		Gross Unrecognized Gains		Gross Unrecognized Losses			Fair Value
Non-mortgage-backed securities:
State or local housing agency obligations	$	111,655	$	—		$	111,655	$	138	$	(5,164	)	$	106,629
Non-mortgage-backed securities	111,655		—			111,655		138		(5,164		)	106,629
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S obligation MBS1	47,234		—			47,234		66		(23		)	47,277
GSE MBS2	4,452,533		—			4,452,533		19,740		(21,639		)	4,450,634
Private-label residential MBS	167,345		(7,950		)	159,395		6,665		(5,505		)	160,555
Mortgage-backed securities	4,667,112		(7,950		)	4,659,162		26,471		(27,167		)	4,658,466
TOTAL	$	4,778,767	$	(7,950	)	$	4,770,817	$	26,609	$	(32,331	)	$	4,765,095

¹  Represents single-family MBS issued by Ginnie Mae, which are guaranteed by the U.S. government.

²  Represents single-family and multi-family MBS issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Table 3.9 summarizes the held-to-maturity securities with unrealized losses as of June 30, 2016 (in thousands). The unrealized losses are aggregated by major security type and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.

Table 3.9

	06/30/2016
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses1
Non-mortgage-backed securities:
State or local housing agency obligations	$	—	$	—		$	36,297	$	(4,908	)	$	36,297	$	(4,908	)
Non-mortgage-backed securities	—		—			36,297		(4,908		)	36,297		(4,908		)
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. obligation MBS2	40,939		(70		)	—		—			40,939		(70		)
GSE MBS3	1,245,375		(4,778		)	1,633,953		(12,536		)	2,879,328		(17,314		)
Private-label residential MBS	4,557		(20		)	96,340		(8,723		)	100,897		(8,743		)
Mortgage-backed securities	1,290,871		(4,868		)	1,730,293		(21,259		)	3,021,164		(26,127		)
TOTAL TEMPORARILY IMPAIRED SECURITIES	$	1,290,871	$	(4,868	)	$	1,766,590	$	(26,167	)	$	3,057,461	$	(31,035	)

¹  Total unrealized losses in Table 3.9 will not agree to total gross unrecognized losses in Table 3.7. Total unrealized losses in Table 3.9 include non-credit-related OTTI recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) and gross unrecognized gains on previously other-than-temporarily impaired securities.

²  Represents single-family MBS issued by Ginnie Mae, which are guaranteed by the U.S. government.

³  Represents single-family and multi-family MBS issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

18

Table 3.10 summarizes the held-to-maturity securities with unrealized losses as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands). The unrealized losses are aggregated by major security type and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.

Table 3.10

	12/31/2015
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses1
Non-mortgage-backed securities:
State or local housing agency obligations	$	—	$	—		$	37,211	$	(5,164	)	$	37,211	$	(5,164	)
Non-mortgage-backed securities	—		—			37,211		(5,164		)	37,211		(5,164		)
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S obligation MBS2	19,189		(23		)	—		—			19,189		(23		)
GSE MBS3	1,697,226		(7,806		)	1,012,199		(13,833		)	2,709,425		(21,639		)
Private-label residential MBS	5,215		(28		)	110,744		(8,826		)	115,959		(8,854		)
Mortgage-backed securities	1,721,630		(7,857		)	1,122,943		(22,659		)	2,844,573		(30,516		)
TOTAL TEMPORARILY IMPAIRED SECURITIES	$	1,721,630	$	(7,857	)	$	1,160,154	$	(27,823	)	$	2,881,784	$	(35,680	)

¹  Total unrealized losses in Table 3.10 will not agree to total gross unrecognized losses in Table 3.8. Total unrealized losses in Table 3.10 include non-credit-related OTTI recognized in AOCI and gross unrecognized gains on previously other-than-temporarily impaired securities.

²  Represents single-family MBS issued by Ginnie Mae, which are guaranteed by the U.S. government.

³  Represents single-family and multi-family MBS issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The amortized cost, carrying value and fair values of held-to-maturity securities by contractual maturity as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are shown in Table 3.11 (in thousands). Expected maturities of certain securities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment fees.

Table 3.11

	06/30/2016						12/31/2015
	Amortized Cost		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Non-mortgage-backed securities:
Due in one year or less	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Due after one year through five years	2,990		2,990		2,990		3,260		3,260		3,260
Due after five years through 10 years	11,205		11,205		11,166		12,375		12,375		12,356
Due after 10 years	95,395		95,395		90,655		96,020		96,020		91,013
Non-mortgage-backed securities	109,590		109,590		104,811		111,655		111,655		106,629
Mortgage-backed securities	4,600,760		4,593,852		4,590,638		4,667,112		4,659,162		4,658,466
TOTAL	$	4,710,350	$	4,703,442	$	4,695,449	$	4,778,767	$	4,770,817	$	4,765,095

19

Table 3.12 details interest rate payment terms for the amortized cost of held-to-maturity securities as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

Table 3.12

	06/30/2016		12/31/2015
Non-mortgage-backed securities:
Variable rate	$	109,590	$	111,655
Non-mortgage-backed securities	109,590		111,655
Mortgage-backed securities:
Fixed rate	284,387		324,177
Variable rate	4,316,373		4,342,935
Mortgage-backed securities	4,600,760		4,667,112
TOTAL	$	4,710,350	$	4,778,767

Other-than-temporary Impairment: For the 21 outstanding private-label securities with OTTI during the lives of the securities, the FHLBank’s reported balances as of June 30, 2016 are presented in Table 3.13 (in thousands):

Table 3.13

	06/30/2016
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Amortized Cost		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Private-label residential MBS:
Prime	$	11,671	$	10,711	$	9,977	$	10,647
Alt-A	32,927		29,456		23,282		27,329
TOTAL	$	44,598	$	40,167	$	33,259	$	37,976

Table 3.14 presents a roll-forward of OTTI activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 related to credit losses recognized in earnings (in thousands):

Table 3.14

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016			06/30/2015			06/30/2016			06/30/2015
Balance, beginning of period	$	7,776		$	9,367		$	7,785		$	9,406
Additional charge on securities for which OTTI was not previously recognized	1			—			1			—
Additional charge on securities for which OTTI was previously recognized1	4			252			31			439
Amortization of credit component of OTTI2	(185		)	(194		)	(221		)	(420		)
Balance, end of period	$	7,596		$	9,425		$	7,596		$	9,425

¹  For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, securities previously impaired represent all securities that were impaired prior to April 1, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, securities previously impaired represent all securities that were impaired prior to January 1, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

²  The FHLBank amortizes the credit component based on estimated cash flows prospectively up to the amount of expected principal to be recovered. The discounted cash flows will move from the discounted loss value to the ultimate principal to be written off at the projected date of loss. If the expected cash flows improve, the amount of expected loss decreases which causes a corresponding decrease in the calculated amortization. Based on the level of improvement in the cash flows, the amortization could become a positive adjustment to income.

20

As of June 30, 2016, the fair value of a portion of the FHLBank's available-for-sale and held-to-maturity MBS were below the amortized cost of the securities due to interest rate volatility and/or illiquidity. However, the decline in fair value of these securities is considered temporary as the FHLBank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis on the remaining securities in unrecognized loss positions and neither intends to sell these securities nor is it more likely than not that the FHLBank will be required to sell these securities before its anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis. For state and local housing agency obligations, the FHLBank determined that all of the gross unrealized losses on these bonds were temporary because the strength of the underlying collateral and credit enhancements was sufficient to protect the FHLBank from losses based on current expectations.

NOTE 4 – ADVANCES

General Terms: The FHLBank offers a wide range of fixed and variable rate advance products with different maturities, interest rates, payment characteristics and optionality. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the FHLBank had advances outstanding at interest rates ranging from 0.28 percent to 7.41 percent and 0.22 percent to 7.41 percent, respectively. Table 4.1 presents advances summarized by year of contractual maturity as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands): 

Table 4.1

	06/30/2016					12/31/2015
Year of Contractual Maturity	Amount			Weighted Average Interest Rate		Amount			Weighted Average Interest Rate
Due in one year or less	$	13,464,206		0.75	%	$	11,230,853		0.65	%
Due after one year through two years	2,549,990			2.28		2,465,866			2.49
Due after two years through three years	1,580,982			1.57		1,816,690			2.02
Due after three years through four years	775,011			1.98		970,726			1.43
Due after four years through five years	1,018,499			2.13		803,465			1.84
Thereafter	6,615,049			1.08		6,186,074			1.17
Total par value	26,003,737			1.13	%	23,473,674			1.16	%
Discounts	(14,661		)			(17,866		)
Hedging adjustments	193,486					124,563
TOTAL	$	26,182,562				$	23,580,371

The FHLBank’s advances outstanding include advances that contain call options that may be exercised with or without prepayment fees at the borrower’s discretion on specific dates (call dates) before the stated advance maturities (callable advances). In exchange for receiving the right to call the advance on a predetermined call schedule, the borrower may pay a higher fixed rate for the advance relative to an equivalent maturity, non-callable, fixed rate advance. The borrower normally exercises its call options on these advances when interest rates decline (fixed rate advances) or spreads change (adjustable rate advances). The FHLBank’s advances as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 include callable advances totaling $6,631,427,000 and $6,326,747,000, respectively. Of these callable advances, there were $6,517,518,000 and $6,213,293,000 of variable rate advances as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Convertible advances allow the FHLBank to convert an advance from one interest payment term structure to another. When issuing convertible advances, the FHLBank may purchase put options from a member that allow the FHLBank to convert the fixed rate advance to a variable rate advance at the current market rate or another structure after an agreed-upon lockout period. A convertible advance carries a lower interest rate than a comparable-maturity fixed rate advance without the conversion feature. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the FHLBank had convertible advances outstanding totaling $1,479,942,000 and $1,472,842,000, respectively.

21

Table 4.2 presents advances summarized by contractual maturity or next call date (for callable advances) and by contractual maturity or next conversion date (for convertible advances) as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

Table 4.2

	Year of Contractual Maturity or Next Call Date				Year of Contractual Maturity or Next Conversion Date
Redemption Term	06/30/2016		12/31/2015		06/30/2016		12/31/2015
Due in one year or less	$	19,720,504	$	16,894,032	$	14,500,399	$	12,454,894
Due after one year through two years	1,918,508		2,037,166		1,677,298		1,573,624
Due after two years through three years	1,163,293		1,464,854		1,543,982		1,577,890
Due after three years through four years	688,335		630,463		792,111		1,033,226
Due after four years through five years	921,049		622,489		1,124,549		830,265
Thereafter	1,592,048		1,824,670		6,365,398		6,003,775
TOTAL PAR VALUE	$	26,003,737	$	23,473,674	$	26,003,737	$	23,473,674

Interest Rate Payment Terms:  Table 4.3 details additional interest rate payment terms for advances as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

Table 4.3

	06/30/2016		12/31/2015
Fixed rate:
Due in one year or less	$	2,526,652	$	2,012,929
Due after one year	6,357,308		6,612,853
Total fixed rate	8,883,960		8,625,782
Variable rate:
Due in one year or less	10,937,554		9,217,924
Due after one year	6,182,223		5,629,968
Total variable rate	17,119,777		14,847,892
TOTAL PAR VALUE	$	26,003,737	$	23,473,674

See Note 6 for information related to the FHLBank’s credit risk on advances and allowance for credit losses.

NOTE 5 – MORTGAGE LOANS

The MPF Program involves the FHLBank investing in mortgage loans, which have been funded by the FHLBank through or purchased from its participating members. These mortgage loans are government-insured or guaranteed loans (by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the Rural Housing Service of the Department of Agriculture (RHS) and/or the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)) and conventional residential loans credit-enhanced by participating financial institutions (PFIs). Depending upon a member’s product selection, the servicing rights can be retained or sold by the participating member. The FHLBank does not buy or own any mortgage servicing rights.

22

Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio: Table 5.1 presents information as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 on mortgage loans held for portfolio (in thousands):

Table 5.1

	06/30/2016			12/31/2015
Real estate:
Fixed rate, medium-term1, single-family mortgages	$	1,384,809		$	1,456,406
Fixed rate, long-term, single-family mortgages	4,980,942			4,830,091
Total unpaid principal balance	6,365,751			6,286,497
Premiums	101,268			100,502
Discounts	(2,188		)	(2,440		)
Deferred loan costs, net	492			596
Other deferred fees	(105		)	(118		)
Hedging adjustments	8,679			7,643
Total before Allowance for Credit Losses on Mortgage Loans	6,473,897			6,392,680
Allowance for Credit Losses on Mortgage Loans	(1,298		)	(1,972		)
MORTGAGE LOANS HELD FOR PORTFOLIO, NET	$	6,472,599		$	6,390,708

¹  Medium-term defined as a term of 15 years or less at origination.

Table 5.2 presents information as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 on the outstanding unpaid principal balance (UPB) of mortgage loans held for portfolio (in thousands):

Table 5.2

	06/30/2016		12/31/2015
Conventional loans	$	5,722,576	$	5,663,709
Government-guaranteed or insured loans	643,175		622,788
TOTAL UNPAID PRINCIPAL BALANCE	$	6,365,751	$	6,286,497

See Note 6 for information related to the FHLBank’s credit risk on mortgage loans and allowance for credit losses.

NOTE 6 – ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

The FHLBank has established an allowance methodology for each of its portfolio segments: credit products (advances, letters of credit and other extensions of credit to borrowers); government mortgage loans held for portfolio; conventional mortgage loans held for portfolio; the direct financing lease receivable; term Federal funds sold; and term securities purchased under agreements to resell. Based on management's analyses of each portfolio segment, the FHLBank has only established an allowance for credit losses on its conventional mortgage loans held for portfolio.

23

Roll-forward of Allowance for Credit Losses: Table 6.1 presents a roll-forward of the allowance for credit losses for the three and six months endedJune 30, 2016 as well as the method used to evaluate impairment relating to all portfolio segments regardless of whether or not an estimated credit loss has been recorded as of June 30, 2016 (in thousands):

Table 6.1

	06/30/2016
	Conventional Loans			Government Loans		Credit Products1		Direct Financing Lease Receivable		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Balance, beginning of three-month period	$	1,607		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,607
Net charge-offs	(97		)	—		—		—		(97		)
(Reversal) provision for credit losses	(212		)	—		—		—		(212		)
Balance, end of three-month period	$	1,298		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,298
Balance, beginning of six-month period	$	1,972		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,972
Net charge-offs	(205		)	—		—		—		(205		)
(Reversal) provision for credit losses	(469		)	—		—		—		(469		)
Balance, end of six-month period	$	1,298		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,298
Allowance for credit losses, end of period:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Collectively evaluated for impairment	1,298			—		—		—		1,298
Recorded investment2, end of period:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	12,722		$	—	$	26,208,296	$	18,598	$	26,239,616
Collectively evaluated for impairment	5,832,702			659,475		—		—		6,492,177
Total	$	5,845,424		$	659,475	$	26,208,296	$	18,598	$	32,731,793

¹  The recorded investment for credit products includes only advances. The recorded investment for all other credit products is insignificant.

²  The recorded investment in a financing receivable is the UPB, adjusted for accrued interest, net deferred loan fees or costs, unamortized premiums or discounts, fair value hedging adjustments and direct write-downs. The recorded investment is not net of any valuation allowance.

24

Table 6.2 presents a roll-forward of the allowance for credit losses for the three and six months endedJune 30, 2015 as well as the method used to evaluate impairment relating to all portfolio segments regardless of whether or not an estimated credit loss has been recorded as of June 30, 2015 (in thousands):

Table 6.2

	06/30/2015
	Conventional Loans			Government Loans		Credit Products1		Direct Financing Lease Receivable		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Balance, beginning of three-month period	$	3,337		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3,337
Net (charge-offs) recoveries	45			—		—		—		45
(Reversal) provision for credit losses	(992		)	—		—		—		(992		)
Balance, end of three-month period	$	2,390		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	2,390
Balance, beginning of six-month period	$	4,550		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,550
Net charge-offs	(366		)	—		—		—		(366		)
(Reversal) provision for credit losses	(1,794		)	—		—		—		(1,794		)
Balance, end of six-month period	$	2,390		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	2,390
Allowance for credit losses, end of period:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	21		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	21
Collectively evaluated for impairment	2,369			—		—		—		2,369
Recorded investment2, end of period:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	13,204		$	—	$	23,308,952	$	20,906	$	23,343,062
Collectively evaluated for impairment	5,702,894			631,547		—		—		6,334,441
Total	$	5,716,098		$	631,547	$	23,308,952	$	20,906	$	29,677,503

¹  The recorded investment for credit products includes only advances. The recorded investment for all other credit products is insignificant.

²  The recorded investment in a financing receivable is the UPB, adjusted for accrued interest, net deferred loan fees or costs, unamortized premiums or discounts, fair value hedging adjustments and direct write-downs. The recorded investment is not net of any valuation allowance.

25

Credit Quality Indicators: The FHLBank’s key credit quality indicators include the migration of: (1) past due loans; (2) non-accrual loans; (3) loans in process of foreclosure; and (4) impaired loans, all of which are used either on an individual or pool basis to determine the allowance for credit losses.

Table 6.3 summarizes the delinquency aging and key credit quality indicators for all of the FHLBank’s portfolio segments as of June 30, 2016 (dollar amounts in thousands):

Table 6.3

	06/30/2016
	Conventional Loans			Government Loans			Credit Products1			Direct Financing Lease Receivable			Total
Recorded investment2:
Past due 30-59 days delinquent	$	36,608		$	15,558		$	—		$	—		$	52,166
Past due 60-89 days delinquent	6,190			4,266			—			—			10,456
Past due 90 days or more delinquent	10,858			5,021			—			—			15,879
Total past due	53,656			24,845			—			—			78,501
Total current loans	5,791,768			634,630			26,208,296			18,598			32,653,292
Total recorded investment	$	5,845,424		$	659,475		$	26,208,296		$	18,598		$	32,731,793
Other delinquency statistics:
In process of foreclosure, included above3	$	4,330		$	2,507		$	—		$	—		$	6,837
Serious delinquency rate4	0.2		%	0.8		%	—		%	—		%	0.1		%
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest	$	—		$	5,021		$	—		$	—		$	5,021
Loans on non-accrual status5	$	15,445		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	15,445

¹  The recorded investment for credit products includes only advances. The recorded investment for all other credit products is insignificant.

²  The recorded investment in a financing receivable is the UPB, adjusted for accrued interest, net deferred loan fees or costs, unamortized premiums or discounts, fair value hedging adjustments and direct write-downs. The recorded investment is not net of any valuation allowance.

³  Includes loans where the decision of foreclosure or similar alternative such as pursuit of deed-in-lieu has been reported. Loans in process of foreclosure are included in past due or current loans dependent on their delinquency status.

⁴  Loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure expressed as a percentage of the total recorded investment for the portfolio class.

⁵  Loans on non-accrual status include $1,319,000 of troubled debt restructurings. Troubled debt restructurings are restructurings in which the FHLBank, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider.

26

Table 6.4 summarizes the key credit quality indicators for all of the FHLBank’s portfolio segments as of December 31, 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands):

Table 6.4

	12/31/2015
	Conventional Loans			Government Loans			Credit Products1			Direct Financing Lease Receivable			Total
Recorded investment2:
Past due 30-59 days delinquent	$	39,016		$	19,426		$	—		$	—		$	58,442
Past due 60-89 days delinquent	7,093			4,696			—			—			11,789
Past due 90 days or more delinquent	12,475			8,021			—			—			20,496
Total past due	58,584			32,143			—			—			90,727
Total current loans	5,726,268			606,941			23,603,691			19,771			29,956,671
Total recorded investment	$	5,784,852		$	639,084		$	23,603,691		$	19,771		$	30,047,398
Other delinquency statistics:
In process of foreclosure, included above3	$	3,661		$	2,947		$	—		$	—		$	6,608
Serious delinquency rate4	0.2		%	1.3		%	—		%	—		%	0.1		%
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest	$	—		$	8,021		$	—		$	—		$	8,021
Loans on non-accrual status5	$	15,976		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	15,976

¹  The recorded investment for credit products includes only advances. The recorded investment for all other credit products is insignificant.

²  The recorded investment in a financing receivable is the UPB, adjusted for accrued interest, net deferred loan fees or costs, unamortized premiums or discounts, fair value hedging adjustments and direct write-downs. The recorded investment is not net of any valuation allowance.

³  Includes loans where the decision of foreclosure or similar alternative such as pursuit of deed-in-lieu has been reported. Loans in process of foreclosure are included in past due or current loans dependent on their delinquency status.

⁴  Loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure expressed as a percentage of the total recorded investment for the portfolio class.

⁵  Loans on non-accrual status include $1,320,000 of troubled debt restructurings. Troubled debt restructurings are restructurings in which the FHLBank, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider.

Individually Evaluated Impaired Loans: Table 6.5 presents the recorded investment, UPB, and related allowance of impaired conventional mortgage loans individually assessed for impairment as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

Table 6.5

	06/30/2016						12/31/2015
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
With no related allowance	$	12,722	$	12,640	$	—	$	11,456	$	11,417	$	—
With an allowance	—		—		—		—		—		—
TOTAL	$	12,722	$	12,640	$	—	$	11,456	$	11,417	$	—

27

Table 6.6 presents the average recorded investment and related interest income recognized on these individually evaluated impaired loans during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

Table 6.6

	Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016				06/30/2015				06/30/2016				06/30/2015
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance	$	12,661	$	65	$	13,166	$	93	$	11,991	$	147	$	14,056	$	181
With an allowance	—		—		180		—		—		—		182		—
TOTAL	$	12,661	$	65	$	13,346	$	93	$	11,991	$	147	$	14,238	$	181

The FHLBank had $2,576,000 and $3,922,000 classified as real estate owned (REO) recorded in other assets as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

NOTE 7 – DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

Table 7.1 represents outstanding notional balances and fair values (includes net accrued interest receivable or payable on the derivatives) of the derivatives outstanding by type of derivative and by hedge designation as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

Table 7.1

	06/30/2016							12/31/2015
	Notional Amount		Derivative Assets		Derivative Liabilities			Notional Amount		Derivative Assets			Derivative Liabilities
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps	$	8,491,308	$	49,630	$	258,703		$	10,338,768	$	59,828		$	136,261
Interest rate caps/floors	—		—		—			60,000		—			94
Total derivatives designated as hedging relationships	8,491,308		49,630		258,703			10,398,768		59,828			136,355
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps	2,153,489		1,850		139,061			3,158,851		589			78,238
Interest rate caps/floors	2,922,800		2,072		—			2,930,800		5,798			9
Mortgage delivery commitments	130,623		827		—			66,045		71			64
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	5,206,912		4,749		139,061			6,155,696		6,458			78,311
TOTAL	$	13,698,220	54,379		397,764			$	16,554,464	66,286			214,666
Netting adjustments and cash collateral1			7,368		(349,801		)			(14,695		)	(183,174		)
DERIVATIVE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES			$	61,747	$	47,963				$	51,591		$	31,492

¹  Amounts represent the application of the netting requirements that allow the FHLBank to settle positive and negative positions and also cash collateral, including initial or variation margin, and related accrued interest held or placed with the same clearing agent and/or derivative counterparty. Cash collateral posted was $357,369,000 and $190,483,000 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Cash collateral received was $200,000 and $22,004,000 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

28

The following tables provide information regarding gains and losses on derivatives and hedging activities by type of hedge and type of derivative and gains and losses by hedged item for fair value hedges.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the FHLBank recorded net gain (loss) on derivatives and hedging activities as presented in Table 7.2 (in thousands):

Table 7.2

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016			06/30/2015			06/30/2016			06/30/2015
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps	$	(1,820	)	$	(592	)	$	(4,310	)	$	(1,425	)
Total net gain (loss) related to fair value hedge ineffectiveness	(1,820		)	(592		)	(4,310		)	(1,425		)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Economic hedges:
Interest rate swaps	(21,421		)	15,470			(64,629		)	21,026
Interest rate caps/floors	(1,623		)	518			(3,716		)	(1,341		)
Net interest settlements	(11,871		)	(9,879		)	(24,115		)	(19,430		)
Mortgage delivery commitments	1,439			(1,200		)	2,988			(476		)
Total net gain (loss) related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	(33,476		)	4,909			(89,472		)	(221		)
NET GAIN (LOSS) ON DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES	$	(35,296	)	$	4,317		$	(93,782	)	$	(1,646	)

The FHLBank carries derivative instruments at fair value on its Statements of Condition. Any change in the fair value of derivatives designated under a fair value hedging relationship is recorded each period in current period earnings. Fair value hedge accounting allows for the offsetting fair value of the hedged risk in the hedged item to also be recorded in current period earnings. For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the FHLBank recorded net gain (loss) on derivatives and the related hedged items in fair value hedging relationships and the impact of those derivatives on the FHLBank’s net interest income as presented in Table 7.3 (in thousands):

Table 7.3

	Three Months Ended
	06/30/2016												06/30/2015
	Gain (Loss) on Derivatives			Gain (Loss) on Hedged Items			Net Fair Value Hedge Ineffectiveness			Effect of Derivatives on Net Interest Income1			Gain (Loss) on Derivatives			Gain (Loss) on Hedged Items			Net Fair Value Hedge Ineffectiveness			Effect of Derivatives on Net Interest Income1
Advances	$	(16,092	)	$	16,217		$	125		$	(23,758	)	$	42,525		$	(41,682	)	$	843		$	(32,130	)
Investments	(23,405		)	21,650			(1,755		)	(3,000		)	—			—			—			—
Consolidated obligation bonds	(3,971		)	3,771			(200		)	9,014			(15,196		)	13,854			(1,342		)	17,820
Consolidated obligation discount notes	98			(88		)	10			15			9			(102		)	(93		)	50
TOTAL	$	(43,370	)	$	41,550		$	(1,820	)	$	(17,729	)	$	27,338		$	(27,930	)	$	(592	)	$	(14,260	)

¹  The differentials between accruals of interest receivables and payables on derivatives designated as fair value hedges as well as the amortization/accretion of hedging activities are recognized as adjustments to the interest income or expense of the designated underlying hedged item.

29

For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the FHLBank recorded net gain (loss) on derivatives and the related hedged items in fair value hedging relationships and the impact of those derivatives on the FHLBank’s net interest income as presented in Table 7.4 (in thousands):

Table 7.4

	Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016												06/30/2015
	Gain (Loss) on Derivatives			Gain (Loss) on Hedged Items			Net Fair Value Hedge Ineffectiveness			Effect of Derivatives on Net Interest Income1			Gain (Loss) on Derivatives		Gain (Loss) on Hedged Items			Net Fair Value Hedge Ineffectiveness			Effect of Derivatives on Net Interest Income1
Advances	$	(71,873	)	$	71,564		$	(309	)	$	(49,192	)	$	24,540	$	(24,028	)	$	512		$	(65,048	)
Investments	(46,220		)	43,112			(3,108		)	(5,337		)	—		—			—			—
Consolidated obligation bonds	2,766			(3,382		)	(616		)	20,561			789		(2,769		)	(1,980		)	38,969
Consolidated obligation discount notes	182			(459		)	(277		)	(45		)	58		(15		)	43			59
TOTAL	$	(115,145	)	$	110,835		$	(4,310	)	$	(34,013	)	$	25,387	$	(26,812	)	$	(1,425	)	$	(26,020	)

¹  The differentials between accruals of interest receivables and payables on derivatives designated as fair value hedges as well as the amortization/accretion of hedging activities are recognized as adjustments to the interest income or expense of the designated underlying hedged item.

Based on credit analyses and collateral requirements, FHLBank management does not anticipate any credit losses on its derivative agreements. The maximum credit risk applicable to a single counterparty was $828,000 and $24,670,000 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The counterparty was different for each period.

Certain of the FHLBank’s uncleared derivative instruments contain provisions that require the FHLBank to post additional collateral with its counterparties if there is deterioration in the FHLBank’s credit rating. If the FHLBank’s credit rating is lowered by a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO), the FHLBank may be required to deliver additional collateral on uncleared derivative instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all uncleared derivative instruments with derivative counterparties containing credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net derivative liability position (before cash collateral and related accrued interest) as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $84,797,000 and $36,302,000, respectively, for which the FHLBank has posted collateral with a fair value of $37,028,000 and $6,622,000, respectively, in the normal course of business. If the FHLBank’s credit rating had been lowered one level (e.g., from double-A to single-A), the FHLBank would have been required to deliver an additional $33,200,000 and $17,500,000 of collateral to its uncleared derivative counterparties as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

For cleared derivatives, the Clearinghouse determines initial margin requirements and generally, credit ratings are not factored into the initial margin. However, clearing agents may require additional initial margin to be posted based on credit considerations, including but not limited to credit rating downgrades. The FHLBank was not required to post additional initial margin by its clearing agents as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

The FHLBank’s net exposure on derivative agreements is presented in Note 10.

30

NOTE 8 – DEPOSITS

The FHLBank offers demand, overnight and short-term deposit programs to its members and to other qualifying non-members. Table 8.1 details the types of deposits held by the FHLBank as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

Table 8.1

	06/30/2016		12/31/2015
Interest-bearing:
Demand	$	295,325	$	235,547
Overnight	310,500		462,500
Term	—		18,400
Total interest-bearing	605,825		716,447
Non-interest-bearing:
Demand	55,530		42,919
Total non-interest-bearing	55,530		42,919
TOTAL DEPOSITS	$	661,355	$	759,366

NOTE 9 – CONSOLIDATED OBLIGATIONS

Consolidated Obligation Bonds: Table 9.1 presents the FHLBank’s participation in consolidated obligation bonds outstanding as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands):

Table 9.1

	06/30/2016					12/31/2015
Year of Contractual Maturity	Amount			Weighted Average Interest Rate		Amount			Weighted Average Interest Rate
Due in one year or less	$	6,227,420		0.80	%	$	9,276,390		0.58	%
Due after one year through two years	3,432,125			1.30		2,317,615			1.71
Due after two years through three years	1,241,500			1.48		1,760,440			1.71
Due after three years through four years	919,150			1.64		823,250			1.72
Due after four years through five years	939,950			1.67		1,008,600			1.59
Thereafter	3,939,500			2.59		4,637,500			2.60
Total par value	16,699,645			1.47	%	19,823,795			1.39	%
Premiums	27,989					19,895
Discounts	(2,743		)			(3,483		)
Concession fees1	(9,330		)			(9,221		)
Hedging adjustments	38,429					35,048
TOTAL	$	16,753,990				$	19,866,034

¹  December 31, 2015 balances modified for change in accounting principle related to the reclassification of concessions on consolidated obligations.

31

The FHLBank’s participation in consolidated obligation bonds outstanding as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 includes callable bonds totaling $5,417,500,000 and $6,758,500,000, respectively. The FHLBank uses the unswapped callable bonds for financing its callable fixed rate advances (Note 4), MBS (Note 3) and mortgage loans (Note 5). Contemporaneous with a portion of its fixed rate callable bond issuances, the FHLBank will also enter into interest rate swap agreements (in which the FHLBank generally pays a variable rate and receives a fixed rate) with call features that mirror the options in the callable bonds (a sold callable swap). The combined sold callable swap and callable debt transaction allows the FHLBank to obtain attractively priced variable rate financing. Table 9.2 summarizes the FHLBank’s participation in consolidated obligation bonds outstanding by year of maturity, or by the next call date for callable bonds as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

Table 9.2

Year of Maturity or Next Call Date	06/30/2016		12/31/2015
Due in one year or less	$	11,482,920	$	15,594,890
Due after one year through two years	3,124,125		2,364,615
Due after two years through three years	915,500		990,440
Due after three years through four years	349,150		215,250
Due after four years through five years	204,950		138,600
Thereafter	623,000		520,000
TOTAL PAR VALUE	$	16,699,645	$	19,823,795

Table 9.3 summarizes interest rate payment terms for consolidated obligation bonds as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

Table 9.3

	06/30/2016		12/31/2015
Fixed rate	$	10,794,645	$	12,068,795
Simple variable rate	5,430,000		6,400,000
Fixed to variable rate	235,000		370,000
Step up/step down	220,000		895,000
Range	20,000		90,000
TOTAL PAR VALUE	$	16,699,645	$	19,823,795

Consolidated Discount Notes: Consolidated discount notes are issued to raise short-term funds. Consolidated discount notes are consolidated obligations with original maturities of up to one year. These consolidated discount notes are generally issued at less than their face amount and redeemed at par value when they mature.

Table 9.4 summarizes the FHLBank’s participation in consolidated obligation discount notes, all of which are due within one year (dollar amounts in thousands):

Table 9.4

	Book Value		Par Value		Weighted Average Interest Rate1
June 30, 2016	$	26,887,678	$	26,897,615	0.34	%
December 31, 2015	$	21,813,446	$	21,821,045	0.27	%

¹  Represents yield to maturity excluding concession fees.

32

NOTE 10 – ASSETS AND LIABILITIES SUBJECT TO OFFSETTING

The FHLBank presents certain financial instruments, including derivatives, repurchase agreements and securities purchased under agreements to resell, on a net basis by clearing agent by Clearinghouse, or by counterparty, when it has met the netting requirements. For these financial instruments, the FHLBank has elected to offset its asset and liability positions, as well as cash collateral, including initial and variation margin, received or pledged, and associated accrued interest.

Tables 10.1 and 10.2 present the fair value of financial assets, including the related collateral received from or pledged to clearing agents or counterparties, based on the terms of the FHLBank’s master netting arrangements or similar agreements as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

Table 10.1

06/30/2016
Description	Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets		Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Condition			Net Amounts of Assets Presented in the Statement of Condition		Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Condition1			Net Amount
Derivative assets:
Uncleared derivatives	$	52,218	$	(44,892	)	$	7,326	$	(827	)	$	6,499
Cleared derivatives	2,161		52,260			54,421		—			54,421
Total derivative assets	54,379		7,368			61,747		(827		)	60,920
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	2,993,427		—			2,993,427		(2,993,427		)	—
TOTAL	$	3,047,806	$	7,368		$	3,055,174	$	(2,994,254	)	$	60,920

¹  Represents noncash collateral received on financial instruments that: (1) do not qualify for netting on the Statement of Condition; or (2) are not subject to an enforceable netting agreement (e.g., mortgage delivery commitments).

Table 10.2

12/31/2015
Description	Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets		Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Condition			Net Amounts of Assets Presented in the Statement of Condition		Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Condition1			Net Amount
Derivative assets:
Uncleared derivatives	$	62,102	$	(53,171	)	$	8,931	$	(71	)	$	8,860
Cleared derivatives	4,184		38,476			42,660		—			42,660
Total derivative assets	66,286		(14,695		)	51,591		(71		)	51,520
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	3,945,000		—			3,945,000		(3,945,000		)	—
TOTAL	$	4,011,286	$	(14,695	)	$	3,996,591	$	(3,945,071	)	$	51,520

¹  Represents noncash collateral received on financial instruments that: (1) do not qualify for netting on the Statement of Condition; or (2) are not subject to an enforceable netting agreement (e.g., mortgage delivery commitments).

33

Tables 10.3 and 10.4 present the fair value of financial liabilities, including the related collateral received from or pledged to counterparties, based on the terms of the FHLBank’s master netting arrangements or similar agreements as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

Table 10.3

06/30/2016
Description	Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities		Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Condition			Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in the Statement of Condition		Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Condition1		Net Amount
Derivative liabilities:
Uncleared derivatives	$	254,500	$	(206,537	)	$	47,963	$	—	$	47,963
Cleared derivatives	143,264		(143,264		)	—		—		—
Total derivative liabilities	397,764		(349,801		)	47,963		—		47,963
TOTAL	$	397,764	$	(349,801	)	$	47,963	$	—	$	47,963

¹  Represents noncash collateral received on financial instruments that: (1) do not qualify for netting on the Statement of Condition; or (2) are not subject to an enforceable netting agreement (e.g., mortgage delivery commitments).

Table 10.4

12/31/2015
Description	Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities		Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Condition			Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in the Statement of Condition		Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Condition1			Net Amount
Derivative liabilities:
Uncleared derivatives	$	159,334	$	(127,842	)	$	31,492	$	(73	)	$	31,419
Cleared derivatives	55,332		(55,332		)	—		—			—
Total derivative liabilities	214,666		(183,174		)	31,492		(73		)	31,419
TOTAL	$	214,666	$	(183,174	)	$	31,492	$	(73	)	$	31,419

¹  Represents noncash collateral received on financial instruments that: (1) do not qualify for netting on the Statement of Condition; or (2) are not subject to an enforceable netting agreement (e.g., mortgage delivery commitments).

34

NOTE 11 – CAPITAL

Capital Requirements: The FHLBank is subject to three capital requirements under the provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB Act) and the Finance Agency’s capital structure regulation. Regulatory capital does not include AOCI but does include mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

• Risk-based capital. The FHLBank must maintain at all times permanent capital in an amount at least equal to the sum of its credit risk, market risk and operations risk capital requirements. The risk-based capital requirements are all calculated in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Finance Agency.Only permanent capital, defined as Class B Common Stock and retained earnings, can be used by the FHLBank to satisfy its risk-based capital requirement. The Finance Agency may require the FHLBank to maintain a greater amount of permanent capital than is required by the risk-based capital requirement as defined, but the Finance Agency has not placed any such requirement on the FHLBank to date.

• Total regulatory capital. The GLB Act requires the FHLBank to maintain at all times at least a 4.0 percent total capital-to-asset ratio. Total regulatory capital is defined as the sum of permanent capital, Class A Common Stock, any general loss allowance, if consistent with GAAP and not established for specific assets, and other amounts from sources determined by the Finance Agency as available to absorb losses.

• Leverage capital. The FHLBank is required to maintain at all times a leverage capital-to-assets ratio of at least 5.0 percent, with the leverage capital ratio defined as the sum of permanent capital weighted 1.5 times and non-permanent capital (currently only Class A Common Stock) weighted 1.0 times, divided by total assets.

Table 11.1 illustrates that the FHLBank was in compliance with its regulatory capital requirements as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands):

Table 11.1

	06/30/2016						12/31/2015
	Required			Actual			Required			Actual
Regulatory capital requirements:
Risk-based capital	$	308,738		$	1,846,430		$	331,821		$	1,681,247
Total regulatory capital-to-asset ratio	4.0		%	4.4		%	4.0		%	4.2		%
Total regulatory capital	$	1,859,645		$	2,036,665		$	1,777,426		$	1,863,468
Leverage capital ratio	5.0		%	6.4		%	5.0		%	6.1		%
Leverage capital	$	2,324,557		$	2,959,881		$	2,221,783		$	2,704,091

Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock: The FHLBank is a cooperative whose members and former members own all of the FHLBank’s capital stock. Member shares cannot be purchased or sold except between the FHLBank and its members at a price equal to the $100 per share par value. If a member cancels its written notice of redemption or notice of withdrawal, the FHLBank will reclassify mandatorily redeemable capital stock from a liability to equity. After the reclassification, dividends on the capital stock would no longer be classified as interest expense.

Table 11.2 presents a roll-forward of mandatorily redeemable capital stock for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

Table 11.2

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016			06/30/2015			06/30/2016			06/30/2015
Balance, beginning of period	$	3,433		$	4,545		$	2,739		$	4,187
Capital stock subject to mandatory redemption reclassified from equity during the period	191,986			74,936			352,220			182,959
Redemption or repurchase of mandatorily redeemable capital stock during the period	(191,094		)	(75,291		)	(350,640		)	(182,966		)
Stock dividend classified as mandatorily redeemable capital stock during the period	31			10			37			20
Balance, end of period	$	4,356		$	4,200		$	4,356		$	4,200

35

Table 11.3 shows the amount of mandatorily redeemable capital stock by contractual year of redemption as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands). The year of redemption in Table 11.3 is the end of the redemption period in accordance with the FHLBank’s capital plan. The FHLBank is not required to redeem or repurchase membership stock until six months (for Class A Common Stock) or five years (for Class B Common Stock) after the FHLBank receives notice for withdrawal. Additionally, the FHLBank is not required to redeem or repurchase activity-based stock until any activity-based stock becomes excess stock as a result of an activity no longer remaining outstanding. However, the FHLBank intends to repurchase the excess activity-based stock of non-members to the extent that it can do so and still meet its regulatory capital requirements.

Table 11.3

Contractual Year of Repurchase	06/30/2016		12/31/2015
Year 1	$	251	$	407
Year 2	192		1
Year 3	1		1
Year 4	—		—
Year 5	2,011		196
Past contractual redemption date due to remaining activity1	1,901		2,134
TOTAL	$	4,356	$	2,739

¹  Represents mandatorily redeemable capital stock that is past the end of the contractual redemption period because there is activity outstanding to which the mandatorily redeemable capital stock relates.

Excess Capital Stock: Excess capital stock is defined as the amount of stock held by a member (or former member) in excess of that institution’s minimum stock purchase requirement. Finance Agency rules limit the ability of the FHLBank to create excess member stock under certain circumstances. For example, the FHLBank may not pay dividends in the form of capital stock or issue new excess stock to members if the FHLBank’s excess stock exceeds one percent of its total assets or if the issuance of excess stock would cause the FHLBank’s excess stock to exceed one percent of its total assets. As of June 30, 2016, the FHLBank’s excess stock was less than one percent of total assets.

Capital Classification Determination:The Finance Agency implemented the prompt corrective action (PCA) provisions of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. The rule established four capital classifications (i.e., adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized) for FHLBanks and implemented the PCA provisions that apply to FHLBanks that are not deemed to be adequately capitalized. The Finance Agency determines each FHLBank’s capital classification on at least a quarterly basis. If an FHLBank is determined to be other than adequately capitalized, the FHLBank becomes subject to additional supervisory authority by the Finance Agency. Before implementing a reclassification, the Director of the Finance Agency is required to provide the FHLBank with written notice of the proposed action and an opportunity to submit a response. As of the most recent review by the Finance Agency for the first quarter of 2016, the FHLBank has been classified as adequately capitalized.

36

NOTE 12 – ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Table 12.1 summarizes the changes in AOCI for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

Table 12.1

	Three Months Ended
	Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Available-for-Sale Securities			Net Non-credit Portion of OTTI Losses on Held-to-maturity Securities			Defined Benefit Pension Plan			Total AOCI
Balance at March 31, 2015	$	—		$	(10,635	)	$	(4,035	)	$	(14,670	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification:
Non-credit OTTI losses				(181		)				(181		)
Accretion of non-credit loss				789						789
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income (loss) to net income:
Non-credit OTTI to credit OTTI1				248						248
Amortization of net loss - defined benefit pension plan2							100			100
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)	—			856			100			956
Balance at June 30, 2015	$	—		$	(9,779	)	$	(3,935	)	$	(13,714	)
Balance at March 31, 2016	$	(3,835	)	$	(7,437	)	$	(2,403	)	$	(13,675	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification:
Unrealized gain (loss)	(2,440		)							(2,440		)
Non-credit OTTI losses				—						—
Accretion of non-credit loss				525						525
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income (loss) to net income:
Non-credit OTTI to credit OTTI1				4						4
Amortization of net loss - defined benefit pension plan2							48			48
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)	(2,440		)	529			48			(1,863		)
Balance at June 30, 2016	$	(6,275	)	$	(6,908	)	$	(2,355	)	$	(15,538	)

¹  Recorded in “Net other-than-temporary impairment losses on held-to-maturity securities” on the Statements of Income. Amount represents a debit (decrease to other income (loss)).

²  Recorded in “Compensation and benefits” on the Statements of Income. Amount represents a debit (increase to other expenses).

37

Table 12.2 summarizes the changes in AOCI for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

Table 12.2

	Six Months Ended
	Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Available-for-Sale Securities			Net Non-credit Portion of OTTI Losses on Held-to-maturity Securities			Defined Benefit Pension Plan			Total AOCI
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	—		$	(11,774	)	$	(4,133	)	$	(15,907	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification:
Non-credit OTTI losses				(181		)				(181		)
Accretion of non-credit loss				1,741						1,741
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income (loss) to net income:
Non-credit OTTI to credit OTTI1				435						435
Amortization of net loss - defined benefit pension plan2							198			198
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)	—			1,995			198			2,193
Balance at June 30, 2015	$	—		$	(9,779	)	$	(3,935	)	$	(13,714	)
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	(8,577	)	$	(7,950	)	$	(2,450	)	$	(18,977	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification:
Unrealized gain (loss)	2,302									2,302
Non-credit OTTI losses				(62		)				(62		)
Accretion of non-credit loss				1,075						1,075
Reclassifications from other comprehensive income (loss) to net income:
Non-credit OTTI to credit OTTI1				29						29
Amortization of net loss - defined benefit pension plan2							95			95
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)	2,302			1,042			95			3,439
Balance at June 30, 2016	$	(6,275	)	$	(6,908	)	$	(2,355	)	$	(15,538	)

¹  Recorded in “Net other-than-temporary impairment losses on held-to-maturity securities” on the Statements of Income. Amount represents a debit (decrease to other income (loss)).

²  Recorded in “Compensation and benefits” on the Statements of Income. Amount represents a debit (increase to other expenses).

NOTE 13 – FAIR VALUES

The fair value amounts recorded on the Statements of Condition and presented in the note disclosures have been determined by the FHLBank using available market and other pertinent information and reflect the FHLBank’s best judgment of appropriate valuation methods. Although the FHLBank uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments, there are inherent limitations in any valuation technique. Therefore, the fair values may not be indicative of the amounts that would have been realized in market transactions as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

38

Subjectivity of Estimates: Estimates of the fair value of advances with options, mortgage instruments, derivatives with embedded options and consolidated obligation bonds with options are highly subjective and require judgments regarding significant matters such as the amount and timing of future cash flows, prepayment speed assumptions, expected interest rate volatility, methods to determine possible distributions of future interest rates used to value options, and the selection of discount rates that appropriately reflect market and credit risks. The use of different assumptions could have a material effect on the fair value estimates.

Fair Value Hierarchy: The FHLBank records trading securities, available-for-sale securities, derivative assets and derivative liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis and on occasion, certain private-label MBS, impaired mortgage loans held for portfolio and non-financial assets on a non-recurring basis. The fair value hierarchy requires the FHLBank to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The inputs are evaluated and an overall level for the fair value measurement is determined. This overall level is an indication of the market observability of the fair value measurement for the asset or liability. The FHLBank must disclose the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the measurements are classified for all assets and liabilities.

The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels:

• Level 1 Inputs – Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the FHLBank can access on the measurement date.

• Level 2 Inputs – Inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable inputs for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include the following: (1) quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; (2) quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; (3) inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals and implied volatilities); and (4) inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

• Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

The FHLBank reviews its fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Changes in the observability of the valuation inputs may result in a reclassification of certain assets or liabilities. There were no reclassifications of assets or liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

39

The carrying value and fair value of the FHLBank’s financial assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are summarized in Tables 13.1 and 13.2 (in thousands). These values do not represent an estimate of the overall market value of the FHLBank as a going concern, which would take into account future business opportunities and the net profitability of assets and liabilities.

Table 13.1

	06/30/2016
	Carrying Value			Total Fair Value			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Netting Adjustment and Cash Collateral
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	214,023		$	214,023		$	214,023	$	—		$	—	$	—
Interest-bearing deposits	371,834			371,834			—		371,834			—		—
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	2,993,427			2,993,427			—		2,993,427			—		—
Federal funds sold	1,823,000			1,823,000			—		1,823,000			—		—
Trading securities	2,494,963			2,494,963			—		2,494,963			—		—
Available-for-sale securities	1,057,923			1,057,923			—		1,057,923			—		—
Held-to-maturity securities	4,703,442			4,695,449			—		4,452,984			242,465		—
Advances	26,182,562			26,249,464			—		26,249,464			—		—
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance	6,472,599			6,781,026			—		6,779,138			1,888		—
Accrued interest receivable	77,918			77,918			—		77,918			—		—
Derivative assets	61,747			61,747			—		54,379			—		7,368
Liabilities:
Deposits	661,355			661,355			—		661,355			—		—
Consolidated obligation discount notes	26,887,678			26,889,115			—		26,889,115			—		—
Consolidated obligation bonds	16,753,990			16,860,815			—		16,860,815			—		—
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock	4,356			4,356			4,356		—			—		—
Accrued interest payable	43,539			43,539			—		43,539			—		—
Derivative liabilities	47,963			47,963			—		397,764			—		(349,801		)
Other Asset (Liability):
Standby letters of credit	(1,040		)	(1,040		)	—		(1,040		)	—		—
Standby bond purchase agreements	17			7,113			—		7,113			—		—
Advance commitments	—			4,953			—		4,953			—		—

40

Table 13.2

	12/31/2015
	Carrying Value			Total Fair Value			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Netting Adjustment and Cash Collateral
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	682,670		$	682,670		$	682,670	$	—		$	—	$	—
Interest-bearing deposits	100,594			100,594			—		100,594			—		—
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	3,945,000			3,945,000			—		3,945,000			—		—
Federal funds sold	2,000,000			2,000,000			—		2,000,000			—		—
Trading securities	2,294,606			2,294,606			—		2,294,606			—		—
Available-for-sale securities	495,063			495,063			—		495,063			—		—
Held-to-maturity securities	4,770,817			4,765,095			—		4,497,911			267,184		—
Advances	23,580,371			23,609,868			—		23,609,868			—		—
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance	6,390,708			6,571,563			—		6,569,749			1,814		—
Accrued interest receivable	79,233			79,233			—		79,233			—		—
Derivative assets	51,591			51,591			—		66,286			—		(14,695		)
Liabilities:
Deposits	759,366			759,366			—		759,366			—		—
Consolidated obligation discount notes	21,813,446			21,813,507			—		21,813,507			—		—
Consolidated obligation bonds	19,866,034			19,851,097			—		19,851,097			—		—
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock	2,739			2,739			2,739		—			—		—
Accrued interest payable	52,281			52,281			—		52,281			—		—
Derivative liabilities	31,492			31,492			—		214,666			—		(183,174		)
Other Asset (Liability):
Standby letters of credit	(1,078		)	(1,078		)	—		(1,078		)	—		—
Standby bond purchase agreements	98			6,995			—		6,995			—		—
Advance commitments	—			(3,737		)	—		(3,737		)	—		—

Fair Value Measurements: Tables 13.3 and 13.4 present, for each hierarchy level, the FHLBank’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis on the Statements of Condition as of or for the periods ended June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands). The FHLBank measures certain held-to-maturity securities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis due to the recognition of a credit loss. For held-to-maturity securities that had credit impairment recorded during a period for which no total impairment was recorded (the full amount of additional credit impairment was a reclassification from non-credit impairment previously recorded in AOCI), these securities were recorded at their carrying values and not fair value. The FHLBank measures certain impaired mortgage loans held for portfolio at fair value on a nonrecurring basis when, upon individual evaluation for impairment, the estimated fair value less costs to sell is lower than the carrying amount. REO is measured at fair value when the asset’s fair value less costs to sell is lower than its carrying amount.

41

Table 13.3

	06/30/2016
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting Adjustment and Cash Collateral1
Recurring fair value measurements - Assets:
Trading securities:
GSE obligations2	$	1,493,441	$	—	$	1,493,441	$	—	$	—
U.S. obligation MBS3	744		—		744		—		—
GSE MBS4	1,000,778		—		1,000,778		—		—
Total trading securities	2,494,963		—		2,494,963		—		—
Available-for-sale securities:
GSE MBS5	1,057,923		—		1,057,923		—		—
Total available-for-sale securities	1,057,923		—		1,057,923		—		—
Derivative assets:
Interest-rate related	60,920		—		53,552		—		7,368
Mortgage delivery commitments	827		—		827		—		—
Total derivative assets	61,747		—		54,379		—		7,368
TOTAL RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS - ASSETS	$	3,614,633	$	—	$	3,607,265	$	—	$	7,368
Recurring fair value measurements - Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities:
Interest-rate related	$	47,963	$	—	$	397,764	$	—	$	(349,801	)
Total derivative liabilities	47,963		—		397,764		—		(349,801		)
TOTAL RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS - LIABILITIES	$	47,963	$	—	$	397,764	$	—	$	(349,801	)
Nonrecurring fair value measurements - Assets6:
Held-to-maturity securities:
Private-label residential MBS	$	4,781	$	—	$	—	$	4,781	$	—
Impaired mortgage loans	1,895		—		—		1,895		—
Real estate owned	807		—		—		807		—
TOTAL NONRECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS - ASSETS	$	7,483	$	—	$	—	$	7,483	$	—

¹  Represents the effect of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow the FHLBank to net settle positive and negative positions and also derivative cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed with the same clearing agent or derivative counterparty.

²  Represents debentures issued by other FHLBanks, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Farm Credit and Farmer Mac. GSE securities are not guaranteed by the U.S. government.

³  Represents single-family MBS issued by Ginnie Mae, which are guaranteed by the U.S. government.

⁴  Represents single-family and multi-family MBS issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

⁵  Represents multi-family MBS issued by Fannie Mae.

⁶  Includes assets adjusted to fair value during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and still outstanding as of June 30, 2016.

42

Table 13.4

	12/31/2015
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting Adjustment and Cash Collateral1
Recurring fair value measurements - Assets:
Trading securities:
GSE obligations2	$	1,338,639	$	—	$	1,338,639	$	—	$	—
U.S. obligation MBS3	801		—		801		—		—
GSE MBS4	955,166		—		955,166		—		—
Total trading securities	2,294,606		—		2,294,606		—		—
Available-for-sale securities:
GSE MBS5	495,063		—		495,063		—		—
Total available-for-sale securities	495,063		—		495,063		—		—
Derivative assets:
Interest-rate related	51,520		—		66,215		—		(14,695		)
Mortgage delivery commitments	71		—		71		—		—
Total derivative assets	51,591		—		66,286		—		(14,695		)
TOTAL RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS - ASSETS	$	2,841,260	$	—	$	2,855,955	$	—	$	(14,695	)
Recurring fair value measurements - Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities:
Interest-rate related	$	31,428	$	—	$	214,602	$	—	$	(183,174	)
Mortgage delivery commitments	64		—		64		—		—
Total derivative liabilities	31,492		—		214,666		—		(183,174		)
TOTAL RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS - LIABILITIES	$	31,492	$	—	$	214,666	$	—	$	(183,174	)
Nonrecurring fair value measurements - Assets6:
Held-to-maturity securities:
Private-label residential MBS	$	6,151	$	—	$	—	$	6,151	$	—
Impaired mortgage loans	1,823						$	1,823
Real estate owned	2,168		—		—		2,168		—
TOTAL NONRECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS - ASSETS	$	10,142	$	—	$	—	$	10,142	$	—

¹  Represents the effect of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow the FHLBank to net settle positive and negative positions and also derivative cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed with the same clearing agent or derivative counterparty.

²  Represents debentures issued by other FHLBanks, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Farm Credit. GSE securities are not guaranteed by the U.S. government.

³  Represents single-family MBS issued by Ginnie Mae, which are guaranteed by the U.S. government.

⁴  Represents single-family and multi-family MBS issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

⁵  Represents multi-family MBS issued by Fannie Mae.

⁶  Includes assets adjusted to fair value during the year ended December 31, 2015 and still outstanding as of December 31, 2015.

43

NOTE 14 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Joint and Several Liability:As provided by the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended (Bank Act) or Finance Agency regulation, consolidated obligations are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. FHLBank Topeka is jointly and severally liable with the other FHLBanks for the payment of principal and interest on all of the consolidated obligations issued by the FHLBanks. The par amounts for which FHLBank Topeka is jointly and severally liable were approximately $920,212,833,000 and $863,556,912,000 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Off-balance Sheet Commitments: As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, off-balance sheet commitments are presented in Table 14.1 (in thousands):

Table 14.1

	06/30/2016						12/31/2015
Notional Amount	Expire Within One Year		Expire After One Year		Total		Expire Within One Year		Expire After One Year		Total
Standby letters of credit outstanding	$	2,828,796	$	13,598	$	2,842,394	$	2,795,968	$	16,598	$	2,812,566
Advance commitments outstanding	106,846		66,975		173,821		104,473		24,950		129,423
Commitments for standby bond purchases	395,225		928,893		1,324,118		314,742		1,108,133		1,422,875
Commitments to fund or purchase mortgage loans	130,623		—		130,623		66,045		—		66,045
Commitments to issue consolidated bonds, at par	530,000		—		530,000		55,000		—		55,000
Commitments to issue consolidated discount notes, at par	650,000		—		650,000		1,154,355		—		1,154,355

Commitments to Extend Credit: Standby letters of credit are executed for members for a fee. A standby letter of credit is a short-term financing arrangement between the FHLBank and its member or non-member housing associate. If the FHLBank is required to make payment for a beneficiary’s draw, these amounts are converted into a collateralized advance to the member. As of June 30, 2016, outstanding standby letters of credit had original terms of 3 days to 10 years with a final expiration in 2020. As of December 31, 2015, outstanding standby letters of credit had original terms of 6 days to 10 years with a final expiration in 2020. Unearned fees as well as the value of the guarantees related to standby letters of credit are recorded in other liabilities and amounted to $1,040,000 and $1,078,000 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Standby letters of credit are fully collateralized with assets allowed by the FHLBank’s Member Products Policy (MPP). Advance commitments legally bind and unconditionally obligate the FHLBank for additional advances up to 24 months in the future. Based upon management’s credit analysis of members and collateral requirements under the MPP, the FHLBank does not expect to incur any credit losses on the outstanding letters of credit or advance commitments.

Standby Bond-Purchase Agreements: The FHLBank has entered into standby bond purchase agreements with state housing authorities whereby the FHLBank, for a fee, agrees to purchase and hold the authorities’ bonds until the designated marketing agent can find a suitable investor or the housing authority repurchases the bond according to a schedule established by the standby agreement. Each standby agreement dictates the specific terms that would require the FHLBank to purchase the bond. The bond purchase commitments entered into by the FHLBank expire no later than 2020, though some are renewable at the option of the FHLBank. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the total commitments for bond purchases were with two in-district and one out-of-district state housing authorities as well as one participation interest in a standby bond purchase agreement between another FHLBank and a state housing authority in its district. The FHLBank was not required to purchase any bonds under any agreements during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

Commitments to Purchase Mortgage Loans: These commitments that unconditionally obligate the FHLBank to purchase mortgage loans from participating FHLBank Topeka members in the MPF Program are generally for periods not to exceed 60 calendar days. Certain commitments are recorded as derivatives at their fair values on the Statements of Condition. The FHLBank recorded mortgage delivery commitment net derivative asset (liability) balances of $827,000 and $7,000 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Commitments to Issue Consolidated Obligations: The FHLBank enters into commitments to issue consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes outstanding in the normal course of its business. All settle within the shortest period possible and are considered regular way trades; thus, the commitments are appropriately not recorded as derivatives.

44

NOTE 15 – TRANSACTIONS WITH STOCKHOLDERS

The FHLBank is a cooperative whose members own the capital stock of the FHLBank and generally receive dividends on their investments. In addition, certain former members that still have outstanding transactions are also required to maintain their investments in FHLBank capital stock until the transactions mature or are paid off. Nearly all outstanding advances are with current members, and the majority of outstanding mortgage loans held for portfolio were purchased from current or former members. The FHLBank also maintains demand deposit accounts for members primarily to facilitate settlement activities that are directly related to advances and mortgage loan purchases.

Transactions with members are entered into in the ordinary course of business. In instances where members also have officers or directors who are directors of the FHLBank, transactions with those members are subject to the same eligibility and credit criteria, as well as the same terms and conditions, as other transactions with members. For financial reporting and disclosure purposes, the FHLBank defines related parties as FHLBank directors’ financial institutions and members with capital stock investments in excess of 10 percent of the FHLBank’s total regulatory capital stock outstanding, which includes mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

Activity with Members that Exceed a 10 Percent Ownership in FHLBank Capital Stock: Tables 15.1 and 15.2 present information as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 on members that owned more than 10 percent of outstanding FHLBank regulatory capital stock in 2016 or 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands). None of the officers or directors of these members currently serve on the FHLBank’s board of directors.

Table 15.1

06/30/2016
Member Name	State	Total Class A Stock Par Value		Percent of Total Class A		Total Class B Stock Par Value		Percent of Total Class B		Total Capital Stock Par Value		Percent of Total Capital Stock
Bank of Oklahoma, NA	OK	$	9,500	5.0	%	$	273,655	23.6	%	$	283,155	20.9	%
MidFirst Bank	OK	500		0.3		200,541		17.3		201,041		14.9
TOTAL		$	10,000	5.3	%	$	474,196	40.9	%	$	484,196	35.8	%

Table 15.2

12/31/2015
Member Name	State	Total Class A Stock Par Value		Percent of Total Class A		Total Class B Stock Par Value		Percent of Total Class B		Total Capital Stock Par Value		Percent of Total Capital Stock
Bank of Oklahoma, NA	OK	$	500	0.3	%	$	218,915	21.3	%	$	219,415	18.1	%
MidFirst Bank	OK	500		0.3		172,718		16.8		173,218		14.3
TOTAL		$	1,000	0.6	%	$	391,633	38.1	%	$	392,633	32.4	%

Advance and deposit balances with members that owned more than 10 percent of outstanding FHLBank regulatory capital stock as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are summarized in Table 15.3 (dollar amounts in thousands).

Table 15.3

	06/30/2016				12/31/2015				06/30/2016				12/31/2015
Member Name	Outstanding Advances		Percent of Total		Outstanding Advances		Percent of Total		Outstanding Deposits		Percent of Total		Outstanding Deposits		Percent of Total
Bank of Oklahoma, NA	$	5,800,000	22.3	%	$	4,800,000	20.4	%	$	3,938	0.6	%	$	21,492	2.8	%
MidFirst Bank	4,405,000		16.9		3,779,000		16.1		622		0.1		541		0.1
TOTAL	$	10,205,000	39.2	%	$	8,579,000	36.5	%	$	4,560	0.7	%	$	22,033	2.9	%

Bank of Oklahoma, NA and MidFirst Bank did not sell any mortgage loans into the MPF Program during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

45

Transactions with FHLBank Directors’ Financial Institutions: Table 15.4 presents information as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 for members that had an officer or director serving on the FHLBank’s board of directors (dollar amounts in thousands). Information is only included for the period in which the officer or director served on the FHLBank’s board of directors. Capital stock listed is regulatory capital stock, which includes mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

Table 15.4

	06/30/2016				12/31/2015
	Outstanding Amount		Percent of Total		Outstanding Amount		Percent of Total
Advances	$	141,898	0.5	%	$	150,566	0.6	%
Deposits	$	10,649	1.6	%	$	7,895	1.0	%
Class A Common Stock	$	3,822	2.0	%	$	4,023	2.2	%
Class B Common Stock	4,045		0.3		4,725		0.5
TOTAL CAPITAL STOCK	$	7,867	0.6	%	$	8,748	0.7	%

Table 15.5 presents mortgage loans acquired during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 for members that had an officer or director serving on the FHLBank’s board of directors in 2016 or 2015 (dollar amounts in thousands).

Table 15.5

	Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016				06/30/2015				06/30/2016				06/30/2015
	Amount		Percent of Total		Amount		Percent of Total		Amount		Percent of Total		Amount		Percent of Total
Mortgage loans acquired	$	21,602	6.6	%	$	36,771	11.5	%	$	33,703	6.1	%	$	63,562	10.8	%

46

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is intended to assist the reader in understanding our business and assessing our operations both historically and prospectively. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our interim financial statements and related notes presented under Part I Item 1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, which includes audited financial statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our MD&A includes the following sections:

• Executive Level Overview – a general description of our business and financial highlights;

• Financial Market Trends – a discussion of current trends in the financial markets and overall economic environment, including the related impact on our operations;

• Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – a discussion of accounting policies that require critical estimates and assumptions;

• Results of Operations – an analysis of our operating results, including disclosures about the sustainability of our earnings;

• Financial Condition – an analysis of our financial position;

• Liquidity and Capital Resources – an analysis of our cash flows and capital position;

• Risk Management – a discussion of our risk management strategies;

• Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards; and

• Legislative and Regulatory Developments.

Executive Level Overview

We are a regional wholesale bank that makes advances (loans) to, purchases mortgages from, and provides limited other financial services to our members. The FHLBanks, together with the Office of Finance, a joint office of the FHLBanks, make up the FHLBank System, which consists of 11 district FHLBanks. As independent, member-owned cooperatives, the FHLBanks seek to maintain a balance between their public purpose and their ability to provide adequate returns on the capital supplied by their members. The FHLBanks are supervised and regulated by the Finance Agency, an independent agency in the executive branch of the U.S. government. The Finance Agency’s mission is to ensure that the housing GSEs operate in a safe and sound manner so that they serve as a reliable source of liquidity and funding for housing finance and community investment.

Our primary funding source is consolidated obligations issued through the FHLBanks’ Office of Finance that facilitates the issuance and servicing of the consolidated obligations. The Finance Agency and the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury oversee the issuance of FHLBank debt through the Office of Finance. Consolidated obligations are debt instruments that constitute the joint and several obligations of all FHLBanks. Although consolidated obligations are not obligations of, nor guaranteed by, the U.S. government, the capital markets have traditionally viewed the FHLBanks’ consolidated obligations as “Federal agency” debt. As a result, the FHLBanks have historically had ready access to funding at relatively favorable spreads to U.S. Treasuries. Additional funds are provided by deposits (received from both member and non-member financial institutions), other borrowings, and the issuance of capital stock.

We serve eligible financial institutions in Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, and Oklahoma (collectively, the Tenth District of the FHLBank System). Initially, a member is required to purchase shares of Class A Common Stock based on the member’s total assets. Each member may be required to purchase activity-based capital stock (Class B Common Stock) as it engages in certain business activities with the FHLBank, including advances and Acquired Member Assets (AMA), at levels determined by management with the Board of Director’s approval and within the ranges stipulated in the Capital Stock Plan. Currently, our capital increases when members are required to purchase additional capital stock in the form of Class B Common Stock to support an increase in their advance borrowings. In the past, capital stock also increased when members sold additional mortgage loans to us; however, members are no longer required to purchase capital stock for AMA activity (former members previously required to purchase AMA activity-based stock are subject to the prior requirement as long as there are unpaid principal balances outstanding). At our discretion, we may repurchase excess stock if there is a decline in a member’s advances. We believe it is important to manage our business and the associated risks so that we strive to provide franchise value by maintaining a core mission asset focus and meeting the following objectives: (1) achieve our liquidity, housing finance and community development missions by meeting member credit needs by offering advances, supporting residential mortgage lending through the MPF Program and through other products; (2) periodically repurchase excess capital stock in order to appropriately manage the size of our balance sheet; and (3) pay stable dividends.

Table 1 presents Selected Financial Data for the periods indicated (dollar amounts in thousands):

47

Table 1

	06/30/2016			03/31/2016			12/31/2015			09/30/2015			06/30/2015
Statement of Condition (as of period end):
Total assets	$	46,491,136		$	45,204,431		$	44,426,133		$	45,772,326		$	45,505,610
Investments1	13,444,589			13,134,315			13,606,080			13,106,413			14,846,345
Advances	26,182,562			25,435,390			23,580,371			25,482,433			23,287,961
Mortgage loans, net2	6,472,599			6,409,954			6,390,708			6,336,328			6,314,269
Total liabilities	44,474,365			43,198,558			42,584,381			43,791,476			43,562,137
Deposits	661,355			726,016			759,366			729,395			594,922
Consolidated obligation bonds, net3	16,753,990			17,150,133			19,866,034			22,225,254			21,212,174
Consolidated obligation discount notes, net3	26,887,678			25,159,376			21,813,446			20,610,434			21,506,927
Total consolidated obligations, net3	43,641,668			42,309,509			41,679,480			42,835,688			42,719,101
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock	4,356			3,433			2,739			3,090			4,200
Total capital	2,016,771			2,005,873			1,841,752			1,980,850			1,943,473
Capital stock	1,347,280			1,346,446			1,208,947			1,344,414			1,303,570
Total retained earnings	685,029			673,102			651,782			650,029			653,617
AOCI	(15,538		)	(13,675		)	(18,977		)	(13,593		)	(13,714		)
Statement of Income (for the quarterly period ended):
Net interest income	64,182			64,870			64,196			61,720			57,150
(Reversal) provision for credit losses on mortgage loans	(212		)	(257		)	283			(398		)	(992		)
Other income (loss)	(13,887		)	(6,516		)	(27,080		)	(30,256		)	(13,537		)
Other expenses	15,279			13,639			13,862			15,187			15,093
Income before assessments	35,228			44,972			22,971			16,675			29,512
Affordable Housing Program (AHP) assessments	3,526			4,498			2,298			1,669			2,952
Net income	31,702			40,474			20,673			15,006			26,560
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Financial Data (for the quarterly period ended):
Dividends paid in cash4	72			73			74			74			74
Dividends paid in stock4	19,703			19,081			18,846			18,520			16,436
Weighted average dividend rate5	5.30		%	5.32		%	5.31		%	5.29		%	5.22		%
Dividend payout ratio6	62.38		%	47.32		%	91.53		%	123.91		%	62.16		%
Return on average equity	5.82		%	7.78		%	3.98		%	2.91		%	5.56		%
Return on average assets	0.26		%	0.34		%	0.17		%	0.13		%	0.25		%
Average equity to average assets	4.49		%	4.40		%	4.39		%	4.46		%	4.48		%
Net interest margin7	0.53		%	0.55		%	0.54		%	0.53		%	0.54		%
Total capital ratio8	4.34		%	4.44		%	4.14		%	4.33		%	4.27		%
Regulatory capital ratio9	4.38		%	4.48		%	4.19		%	4.36		%	4.31		%
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges10	1.44			1.58			1.36			1.29			1.56

¹  Includes trading securities, available-for-sale securities, held-to-maturity securities, interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell and Federal funds sold.

²  The allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans was $1,298,000, $1,607,000, $1,972,000, $1,897,000 and $2,390,000 as of June 30, 2016, March 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015, respectively.

³  Consolidated obligations are bonds and discount notes that we are primarily liable to repay. See Note 14 to the financial statements for a description of the total consolidated obligations of all FHLBanks for which we are jointly and severally liable.

⁴  Dividends reclassified as interest expense on mandatorily redeemable capital stock and not included as dividends recorded in accordance with GAAP were $32,000, $9,000, $7,000, $10,000 and $11,000 for the quarters ended June 30, 2016, March 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, September 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015, respectively.

⁵  Dividends paid in cash and stock on both classes of stock as a percentage of average capital stock eligible for dividends.

⁶  Ratio disclosed represents dividends declared and paid during the period as a percentage of net income for the period presented, although the Finance Agency regulation requires dividends be paid out of known income prior to declaration date.

⁷  Net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets.

⁸  GAAP capital stock, which excludes mandatorily redeemable capital stock, plus retained earnings and AOCI as a percentage of total assets.

⁹  Regulatory capital (i.e., permanent capital and Class A Common Stock) as a percentage of total assets.

¹⁰  Total earnings divided by fixed charges (interest expense including amortization/accretion of premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness).

48

Net income increased$5.1 million, or 19.4 percent, to $31.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $26.6 million for the same period in the prior year. Net income increased$14.5 million, or 25.1 percent, to $72.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $57.7 million for the same period in the prior year. The increase in net income was primarily a result of an increase in net interest income of $7.0 million, or 12.3 percent, and $15.3 million, or 13.4 percent, for the three- and six-month periods, respectively. The increases in net interest income when compared to the same periods in 2015 were largely a result of advance growth, increases in higher-yielding investments, and higher average rates on short-term investments, partially offset by an increase in average funding cost driven by increases in short-term interest rates and widening in our debt spreads relative to LIBOR. Detailed discussion relating to the fluctuations in net interest income can be found under this Item 2 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations.”

Total assets increased $2.1 billion, or 4.6 percent, from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016. This increase was due to a $2.6 billion, or 11.0 percent, increase in advances, mostly in our line of credit advance product. This growth is attributed to the increase in dividend rates (discussed below), which effectively reduces the cost of our advances to our members and increases our members' ability to profitably deploy the funding. We have been actively promoting the impact of our Class B Common Stock dividend on the effective borrowing cost of advances to increase member awareness of the benefit of higher dividends. Changes in interest rates could reduce the benefit of these short-term advances to our members, which could cause a significant decline in advances. Cash and short-term investments decreased $1.3 billion from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016 as a result of a higher amount of advance repayments at the end of the year compared to the amount of advance repayments received at June 30, 2016, and shifting short-term investments into long-term investment securities. The balance of long-term investment securities increased $0.7 billion from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016.

Total liabilities increased $1.9 billion, or 4.4 percent, from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016. This increase was due to a $5.1 billionincrease in consolidated obligation discount notes partially offset by a $3.1 billion decrease in consolidated obligation bonds. Our funding mix generally is driven by asset composition, but we have also shifted our debt composition to a higher percentage of lower-cost discount notes as a result of market conditions that have increased the cost of consolidated obligations swapped or indexed to LIBOR. For additional information, see Item 2 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition.”

Return on average equity (ROE) was 5.82 percent and 5.56 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and 6.78 percent and 6.30 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Despite the increase in average capital caused by the increase in advances, the increase in net income resulted in an increase in ROE for both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 compared to the prior year periods.

Dividends paid to members totaled $38.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $31.2 million for the same period in the prior year. The dividend rate for Class A Common Stock remained at 1.00 percent and the dividend rate for Class B Common Stock has remained at 6.00 percent since the third quarter of 2014. Differences in the weighted average dividend rates between the quarters ended June 30, 2016 (5.30 percent) and 2015 (5.22 percent) are due to the difference in the mix of Class A and Class B Common Stock between those periods. Other factors impacting the stock class mix and, therefore, the average dividend rates include weekly exchanges of excess Class B Common Stock to Class A Common Stock and periodic repurchases of excess Class A Common Stock (see “Liquidity and Capital Resources - Capital”under this Item 2). 

Finance Agency guidance requires that our strategic business plan describes how our business activities will achieve our mission consistent with the Finance Agency’s core mission asset guidance. We intend to manage our balance sheet with an emphasis towards maintaining a core mission assets ratio within the range of 70 to 80 percent during 2016. Our ratio of average advances and average mortgage loans to average consolidated obligations based on par balances (core mission assets ratio) was 79 percent for the first half of 2016. However, because this ratio is dependent on several variables such as member demand for our advance and mortgage loan products, it is possible that we will be unable to maintain the core mission assets ratio at this level indefinitely.

49

Financial Market Trends

The primary external factors that affect net interest income are market interest rates and the general state of the economy.

General discussion of the level of market interest rates:

Table 2 presents selected market interest rates as of the dates or for the periods shown.

Table 2

	06/30/2016		06/30/2015		06/30/2016		06/30/2015
Market Instrument	Three-month		Three-month		Six-month		Six-month		06/30/2016	12/31/2015	06/30/2015
	Average		Average		Average		Average		Ending Rate	Ending Rate	Ending Rate
Overnight Federal funds effective/target rate1	0.37	%	0.13	%	0.37	%	0.12	%	0.25 to 0.50%	0.25 to 0.50%	0.0 to 0.25%
Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) target rate for overnight Federal funds1	0.25 to 0.50		0.0 to 0.25		0.25 to 0.50		0.0 to 0.25		0.25 to 0.50	0.25 to 0.50	0.0 to 0.25
3-month U.S. Treasury bill1	0.25		0.01		0.27		0.01		0.26	0.16	0.01
3-month LIBOR1	0.64		0.28		0.63		0.27		0.65	0.61	0.28
2-year U.S. Treasury note1	0.77		0.61		0.80		0.60		0.60	1.06	0.62
5-year U.S. Treasury note1	1.24		1.52		1.30		1.49		1.02	1.78	1.61
10-year U.S. Treasury note1	1.75		2.16		1.83		2.06		1.48	2.29	2.31
30-year residential mortgage note rate2	3.82		4.02		3.88		3.97		3.75	4.19	4.26

¹  Source is Bloomberg (overnight Federal funds rate is the effective rate for the averages and the target rate for the ending rates).

²  Mortgage Bankers Association weekly 30-year fixed rate mortgage contract rate obtained from Bloomberg.

Through the first half of 2016, the cost of FHLBank consolidated obligations as measured by the spread to comparative U.S. Treasury rates remained relatively stable; however, the spread to three-month LIBOR deteriorated in the last half of 2015 as a result of actions taken by foreign central banks to support their currencies and also due to heavy issuance of term corporate debt that is swapped to LIBOR. These conditions have increased the cost of consolidated obligations swapped or indexed to LIBOR, and are expected to persist into the second half of 2016, although to a lessening extent. As a result of weakening spreads, we anticipate funding a larger portion of our balance sheet with discount notes during 2016. Due to a decrease in interest rates during the second quarter, we were able to call and replace some unswapped callable consolidated obligation bonds at a lower cost. At the end of 2015, the FOMC raised the target rate for overnight Federal funds for the first time in nearly a decade and emphasized a potential plan to raise rates gradually for the next three years. The statement from the July 2016 meeting indicates that near-term risks to the economic outlook have declined but not to the extent that a rate increase is supported in the near term. The FOMC expects economic conditions to evolve in such a way that additional rate increases are expected to be gradual. The FOMC concluded the asset purchase program in October 2014 but is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of GSE debt and GSE MBS and of rolling over maturing U.S. Treasury securities at auction. The rates on U.S. Treasuries and GSE MBS are expected to increase once the Federal Reserve is no longer reinvesting those principal payments. We issue debt at a spread above U.S. Treasury securities, so higher interest rates increase the cost of issuing FHLBank consolidated obligations and increase the cost of advances to our members and housing associates. For further discussion, see this Item 2 – “Financial Condition – Consolidated Obligations.”

Other factors impacting FHLBank consolidated obligations:

Investors continue to view FHLBank consolidated obligations as carrying a relatively strong credit profile. Historically, our strong credit profile has resulted in steady investor demand for FHLBank discount notes and short-term bonds. This has allowed the overall cost to issue short-term consolidated obligations to remain relatively low throughout the first half of 2016. Several market events continue to have the potential to impact the demand for our consolidated obligations including geopolitical events and/or disruptions; the upcoming presidential election; changes in interest rates and the shape of the yield curve as the FOMC contemplates increasing short-term interest rates; and a decline in dealer demand due to regulatory changes.

50

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make a number of judgments and assumptions that affect our reported results and disclosures. Several of our accounting policies are inherently subject to valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments and are more critical than others in terms of their importance to results. These assumptions and assessments include the following:

• Accounting related to derivatives and hedging activities;

• Fair value determinations;

• Accounting for deferred premium/discount associated with MBS; and

• Determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses.

Changes in any of the estimates and assumptions underlying critical accounting policies could have a material effect on our financial statements.

The accounting policies that management believes are the most critical to an understanding of our financial results and condition and require complex management judgment are described under Item 7 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in our annual report on Form 10-K, incorporated by reference herein. There were no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates during the quarter ended June 30, 2016.

Results of Operations

Earnings Analysis: Table 3 presents changes in the major components of our net income (dollar amounts in thousands):

Table 3

	Increase (Decrease) in Earnings Components
	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016 vs. 06/30/2015					06/30/2016 vs. 06/30/2015
	Dollar Change			Percentage Change		Dollar Change			Percentage Change
Total interest income	$	34,883		31.6	%	$	69,116		31.6	%
Total interest expense	27,851			52.5		53,828			51.2
Net interest income	7,032			12.3		15,288			13.4
(Reversal) provision for credit losses on mortgage loans	780			78.6		1,325			73.9
Net interest income after mortgage loan loss provision	6,252			10.8		13,963			12.1
Net gain (loss) on trading securities	38,897			190.9		93,945			358.4
Net gain (loss) on derivatives and hedging activities	(39,613		)	(917.6	)	(92,136		)	(5,597.6	)
Other non-interest income	366			14.5		541			10.6
Total other income (loss)	(350		)	(2.6	)	2,350			10.3
Operating expenses	637			5.2		89			0.4
Other non-interest expenses	(451		)	(16.5	)	116			2.5
Total other expenses	186			1.2		205			0.7
AHP assessments	574			19.4		1,613			25.2
NET INCOME	$	5,142		19.4	%	$	14,495		25.1	%

51

Table 4 presents the amounts contributed by our principal sources of interest income (dollar amounts in thousands):

Table 4

	Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016				06/30/2015				06/30/2016				06/30/2015
	Interest Income		Percent of Total		Interest Income		Percent of Total		Interest Income		Percent of Total		Interest Income		Percent of Total
Investments1	$	36,964	25.5	%	$	25,270	22.9	%	$	73,455	25.5	%	$	48,969	22.4	%
Advances	56,842		39.2		34,150		31.0		110,530		38.4		66,657		30.5
Mortgage loans held for portfolio	50,992		35.1		50,455		45.8		103,293		35.9		102,471		46.8
Other	314		0.2		354		0.3		641		0.2		706		0.3
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME	$	145,112	100.0	%	$	110,229	100.0	%	$	287,919	100.0	%	$	218,803	100.0	%

¹  Includes trading securities, available-for-sale securities, held-to-maturity securities, interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell and Federal funds sold.

Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was $31.7 million compared to $26.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $72.2 million compared to $57.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in net income was primarily a result of an increase in net interest income of $7.0 million, or 12.3 percent, and $15.3 million, or 13.4 percent, for the three- and six-month periods, respectively. The increases in net interest income when compared to the same periods in 2015 were largely a result of advance growth, increases in higher-yielding investments, and higher average rates on short-term investments, partially offset by an increase in average funding cost driven by increases in short-term interest rates and widening in our debt spreads relative to LIBOR.

ROE was 5.82 percent and 5.56 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015, respectively, and 6.78 percent and 6.30 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Despite the increase in average capital, the increase in net income resulted in an increase in ROE for both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 compared to the prior year periods.

Net Interest Income: Net interest income, which includes interest earned on advances, mortgage loans, and investments less interest paid on consolidated obligations, deposits, and other borrowings is the primary source of our earnings. Net interest income increased $7.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 and $15.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the prior year periods. The increase in net interest income for both periods was due to $4.8 billion and $5.6 billion increases in the average balance of advances for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to the prior year periods (see Tables 5 and 7) along with an overall increase in the average yield of advances as a result of an increase in short-term interest rates. The increase in net interest income for the same periods was also a result of recent purchases of higher yielding investment securities and increases in the average balances and yields of short-term investments, partially offset by an increase in average funding cost driven by increases in short-term interest rates and widening in our debt spreads relative to LIBOR. Despite the increase in net interest income, our net interest margin has declined slightly for both the three- and six-month periods due to: (1) asset growth in lower-spread advance products; and (2) reduced asset concentration and declining yields in our highest-yielding asset, our mortgage loan portfolio. The mortgage loan portfolio has declined as a percentage of interest-earning assets primarily as a result of growth in advances and other assets, and has experienced declining yields due to prepayments and the related premium amortization combined with new mortgage volume at lower interest rates.

The average yield on investments, which consists of interest-bearing deposits, Federal funds sold, reverse repurchase agreements, and investment securities increased 32 basis points, from 0.90 percent for the both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 to 1.22 percent for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in yields for both periods was a result of compositional changes in the portfolio combined with increasing yields on individual portfolios. The average yield on investment securities increased 33 basis points for both periods, and the average balance of the portfolio increased $0.7 billion and $0.8 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, largely as a result of purchases of higher yielding fixed rate multi-family GSE MBS.

52

The average yield on advances increased 22 basis points, from 0.54 percent for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 to 0.76 percent for the current quarter. The average yield on advances increased 19 basis points, from 0.56 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2015 to 0.75 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase in the average yield on advances was due to an increase in short-term interest rates. The average balance of advances increased $4.8 billion, or19.2 percent from the second quarter of 2015 to the second quarter of 2016. The average balance of advances increased $5.6 billion, or 23.2 percent from the six months ended June 30, 2015 to the same period of 2016. Average advances have increased each quarter since the second quarter of 2014 due to our efforts to promote the impact of our Class B Common Stock dividend on the effective borrowing cost of short-term advances to increase member awareness of the benefit of higher dividends.

The average yield on mortgage loans decreased three basis points, from 3.21 percent for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 to 3.18 percent for the quarter ended June 30, 2016. The average yield on mortgage loans decreased five basis points, from 3.29 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2015 to 3.24 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease is a result of downward repricing of the portfolio as prepayments of higher-coupon loans have remained fairly steady since the first quarter of 2015, along with the related premium acceleration (yields on mortgage loans decline as premiums are amortized; amortization accelerates as prepayments increase), combined with purchases of mortgage loans at lower rates. Mortgage rates are not expected to increase substantially in 2016, so premium amortization is likely to remain near current levels, although prepayments tend to slow down during periods of relatively stable rates, as borrowers who are able to refinance their mortgages have already done so.

The average cost of consolidated obligation bonds increased 39 basis points between quarters, from 0.99 percent for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 to 1.38 percent for the current quarter, and the average cost of discount notes increased 26 basis points over the same period, from 0.08 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2015 to 0.34 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The average cost of consolidated obligation bonds increased 30 basis points between periods, from 0.99 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2015 to 1.29 percent for the current six month period, and the average cost of discount notes increased 25 basis points over the same period, from 0.08 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2015 to 0.33 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The average balance of discount notes increased by $9.3 billion, or 46.9 percent, and $9.1 billion, or 49.3 percent between the three- and six-month periods, respectively, ended June 30, 2016 compared to the prior year periods. Average bond balances declined by $3.5 billion, or 17.6 percent, and $2.3 billion, or 11.4 percent, over the same periods, respectively. The increase in the average cost of consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes was a result of the increase in short-term interest rates between periods and widening spreads. The shift in composition has been a result of replacing maturing LIBOR-based funding with discount notes in response to market conditions that caused an increase in the cost of consolidated obligations indexed or swapped to LIBOR. Due to a decrease in interest rates during the second quarter, we were able to replace some maturing and unswapped callable consolidated obligation bonds at a lower cost. Replacing callable debt generally increases interest costs in the short term due to the acceleration of the unamortized concessions on the debt when it is called because concession costs are amortized to contractual maturity. However, this increase is offset by the lower rate on the new debt and the funding benefit due to the timing differences between the date the debt is called and the forward settlement date of the new debt (conventionally not exceeding 30 days). For further discussion of how we use discount notes and bonds, see Item 2 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition – Consolidated Obligations.”

Our net interest spread is also impacted by derivative and hedging activities, as the assets and liabilities hedged with derivative instruments designated under fair value hedging relationships are adjusted for changes in fair values, while other assets and liabilities are carried at historical cost. Further, net interest payments or receipts on interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges and the amortization/accretion of hedging activities are recognized as adjustments to the interest income or expense of the hedged asset or liability. However, net interest payments or receipts on derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting (economic hedges) flow through net gain (loss) on derivatives and hedging activities instead of net interest income (net interest received/paid on economic derivatives is identified in Tables 9through12 under this Item 2), which distorts yields, especially for trading investments that are swapped to a variable rate.

53

Table 5 presents average balances and annualized yields of major earning asset categories and the sources funding those earning assets (dollar amounts in thousands):

Table 5

	Three Months Ended
	06/30/2016						06/30/2015
	Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Yield		Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Yield
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	498,690	$	454	0.37	%	$	217,425	$	55	0.10	%
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	2,308,060		2,548		0.44		2,269,923		1,013		0.18
Federal funds sold	1,479,920		1,417		0.39		1,599,615		485		0.12
Investment securities1,2	7,885,167		32,545		1.66		7,144,877		23,717		1.33
Advances2,3	30,056,210		56,842		0.76		25,219,322		34,150		0.54
Mortgage loans2,4,5	6,440,181		50,992		3.18		6,306,320		50,455		3.21
Other interest-earning assets	18,748		314		6.74		25,776		354		5.51
Total earning assets	48,686,976		145,112		1.20		42,783,258		110,229		1.03
Other non-interest-earning assets	112,710						13,414
Total assets	$	48,799,686					$	42,796,672
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits	$	609,957	234		0.15		$	645,745	135		0.08
Consolidated obligations2:
Discount Notes	29,061,038		24,272		0.34		19,776,912		3,751		0.08
Bonds	16,435,102		56,318		1.38		19,957,046		49,121		0.99
Other borrowings	11,606		106		3.68		17,102		72		1.69
Total interest-bearing liabilities	46,117,703		80,930		0.71		40,396,805		53,079		0.53
Capital and other non-interest-bearing funds	2,681,983						2,399,867
Total funding	$	48,799,686					$	42,796,672
Net interest income and net interest spread6			$	64,182	0.49	%			$	57,150	0.50	%
Net interest margin7					0.53	%					0.54	%

¹  The non-credit portion of the OTTI discount on held-to-maturity securities and the fair value adjustment on available-for-sale securities are excluded from the average balance for calculations of yield since the changes are adjustments to equity.

²  Interest income/expense and average rates include the effect of associated derivatives.

³  Advance income includes prepayment fees on terminated advances.

⁴  CE fee payments are netted against interest earnings on the mortgage loans. The expense related to CE fee payments to PFIs was $1.3 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

⁵  Mortgage loans average balance includes outstanding principal for non-performing conventional loans. However, these loans no longer accrue interest.

⁶  Net interest spread is the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

⁷  Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

54

Changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and the level of interest rates influence changes in net interest income, net interest spread and net interest margin. Table 6 summarizes changes in interest income and interest expense (in thousands):

Table 6

	Three Months Ended
	06/30/2016 vs. 06/30/2015
	Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Volume1,2			Rate1,2			Total
Interest Income:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	134		$	265		$	399
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	17			1,518			1,535
Federal funds sold	(39		)	971			932
Investment securities	2,635			6,193			8,828
Advances	7,397			15,295			22,692
Mortgage loans	1,064			(527		)	537
Other assets	(109		)	69			(40		)
Total earning assets	11,099			23,784			34,883
Interest Expense:
Deposits	(7		)	106			99
Consolidated obligations:
Discount notes	2,487			18,034			20,521
Bonds	(9,724		)	16,921			7,197
Other borrowings	(29		)	63			34
Total interest-bearing liabilities	(7,273		)	35,124			27,851
Change in net interest income	$	18,372		$	(11,340	)	$	7,032

¹  Changes in interest income and interest expense not identifiable as either volume-related or rate-related have been allocated to volume and rate based upon the proportion of the absolute value of the volume and rate changes.

²  Amounts used to calculate volume and rate changes are based on numbers in dollars. Accordingly, recalculations using the amounts in thousands as disclosed in this report may not produce the same results.

55

Table 7 presents average balances and yields of major earning asset categories and the sources funding those earning assets (dollar amounts in thousands):

Table 7

	Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016						06/30/2015
	Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Yield		Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Yield
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	435,714	$	786	0.36	%	$	220,343	$	109	0.10	%
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	2,483,425		5,577		0.45		1,893,028		1,578		0.17
Federal funds sold	1,518,185		2,812		0.37		1,972,298		1,144		0.12
Investment securities1,2	7,679,238		64,280		1.68		6,871,079		46,138		1.35
Advances2,3	29,532,245		110,530		0.75		23,961,919		66,657		0.56
Mortgage loans2,4,5	6,417,398		103,293		3.24		6,279,075		102,471		3.29
Other interest-earning assets	20,828		641		6.20		23,842		706		5.97
Total earning assets	48,087,033		287,919		1.20		41,221,584		218,803		1.07
Other non-interest-earning assets	116,613						21,490
Total assets	$	48,203,646					$	41,243,074
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits	$	607,080	460		0.15		$	699,712	299		0.09
Consolidated obligations2:
Discount Notes	27,415,635		45,179		0.33		18,360,138		7,253		0.08
Bonds	17,568,285		113,047		1.29		19,835,294		97,346		0.99
Other borrowings	9,685		181		3.76		13,871		141		2.04
Total interest-bearing liabilities	45,600,685		158,867		0.70		38,909,015		105,039		0.54
Capital and other non-interest-bearing funds	2,602,961						2,334,059
Total funding	$	48,203,646					$	41,243,074
Net interest income and net interest spread6			$	129,052	0.50	%			$	113,764	0.53	%
Net interest margin7					0.54	%					0.56	%

¹  The non-credit portion of the OTTI discount on held-to-maturity securities and the fair value adjustment on available-for-sale securities are excluded from the average balance for calculations of yield since the changes are adjustments to equity.

²  Interest income/expense and average rates include the effect of associated derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting treatment.

³  Advance income includes prepayment fees on terminated advances.

⁴  CE fee payments are netted against interest earnings on the mortgage loans. The expense related to CE fee payments to PFIs was $2.6 million and $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

⁵  Mortgage loans average balance includes outstanding principal for non-performing conventional loans. However, these loans no longer accrue interest.

⁶  Net interest spread is the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

⁷  Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

56

Changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and the level of interest rates influence changes in net interest income, net interest spread and net interest margin. Table 8 summarizes changes in interest income and interest expense (in thousands):

Table 8

	Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016 vs. 06/30/2015
	Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Volume1,2			Rate1,2			Total
Interest Income:
Interest-bearing deposits	$	183		$	494		$	677
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	622			3,377			3,999
Federal funds sold	(318		)	1,986			1,668
Investment securities	5,858			12,284			18,142
Advances	17,649			26,224			43,873
Mortgage loans	2,238			(1,416		)	822
Other assets	(92		)	27			(65		)
Total earning assets	26,140			42,976			69,116
Interest Expense:
Deposits	(44		)	205			161
Consolidated obligations:
Discount notes	5,104			32,822			37,926
Bonds	(12,056		)	27,757			15,701
Other borrowings	(52		)	92			40
Total interest-bearing liabilities	(7,048		)	60,876			53,828
Change in net interest income	$	33,188		$	(17,900	)	$	15,288

¹  Changes in interest income and interest expense not identifiable as either volume-related or rate-related have been allocated to volume and rate based upon the proportion of the absolute value of the volume and rate changes.

²  Amounts used to calculate volume and rate changes are based on numbers in dollars. Accordingly, recalculations using the amounts in thousands as disclosed in this report may not produce the same results.

Net Gain (Loss) on Derivatives and Hedging Activities: The volatility in other income (loss) is driven predominantly by net gains (losses) on derivative and hedging transactions, which include interest rate swaps, caps and floors. Net gain (loss) from derivatives and hedging activities is sensitive to several factors, including: (1) the general level of interest rates; (2) the shape of the term structure of interest rates; and (3) implied volatilities of interest rates. The fair value of options, particularly interest rate caps and floors, are also impacted by the time value decay that occurs as the options approach maturity, but this factor represents the normal amortization of the cost of these options and flows through income irrespective of any changes in the other factors impacting the fair value of the options (level of rates, shape of curve, and implied volatility).

57

Tables 9through12 categorize the earnings impact by product for hedging activities (in thousands):

Table 9

	Three Months Ended 06/30/2016
	Advances			Investments			Mortgage Loans			Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes		Consolidated Obligation Bonds			Total
Impact of derivatives and hedging activities in net interest income:
Net amortization/accretion of hedging activities	$	(1,208	)	$	—		$	(692	)	$	—	$	—		$	(1,900	)
Net interest received (paid)	(22,550		)	(3,000		)	—			15		9,014			(16,521		)
Subtotal	(23,758		)	(3,000		)	(692		)	15		9,014			(18,421		)
Net gain (loss) on derivatives and hedging activities:
Fair value hedges:
Interest rate swaps	125			(1,755		)	—			10		(200		)	(1,820		)
Economic hedges – unrealized gain (loss) due to fair value changes:
Interest rate swaps	—			(20,860		)	—			—		(561		)	(21,421		)
Interest rate caps	—			(1,623		)	—			—		—			(1,623		)
Mortgage delivery commitments	—			—			1,439			—		—			1,439
Economic hedges – net interest received (paid)	—			(12,884		)	—			—		1,013			(11,871		)
Subtotal	125			(37,122		)	1,439			10		252			(35,296		)
Net impact of derivatives and hedging activities	(23,633		)	(40,122		)	747			25		9,266			(53,717		)
Net gain (loss) on trading securities hedged on an economic basis with derivatives	—			18,582			—			—		—			18,582
TOTAL	$	(23,633	)	$	(21,540	)	$	747		$	25	$	9,266		$	(35,135	)

58

Table 10

	Three Months Ended 06/30/2015
	Advances			Investments			Mortgage Loans			Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes			Consolidated Obligation Bonds			Total
Impact of derivatives and hedging activities in net interest income:
Net amortization/accretion of hedging activities	$	(1,969	)	$	—		$	(570	)	$	—		$	(2	)	$	(2,541	)
Net interest received (paid)	(30,161		)	—			—			50			17,822			(12,289		)
Subtotal	(32,130		)	—			(570		)	50			17,820			(14,830		)
Net gain (loss) on derivatives and hedging activities:
Fair value hedges:
Interest rate swaps	843			—			—			(93		)	(1,342		)	(592		)
Economic hedges – unrealized gain (loss) due to fair value changes:
Interest rate swaps	—			17,772			—			—			(2,302		)	15,470
Interest rate caps/floors	—			518			—			—			—			518
Mortgage delivery commitments	—			—			(1,200		)	—			—			(1,200		)
Economic hedges – net interest received (paid)	—			(11,975		)	—			—			2,096			(9,879		)
Subtotal	843			6,315			(1,200		)	(93		)	(1,548		)	4,317
Net impact of derivatives and hedging activities	(31,287		)	6,315			(1,770		)	(43		)	16,272			(10,513		)
Net gain (loss) on trading securities hedged on an economic basis with derivatives	—			(20,347		)	—			—			—			(20,347		)
TOTAL	$	(31,287	)	$	(14,032	)	$	(1,770	)	$	(43	)	$	16,272		$	(30,860	)

59

Table 11

	Six Months Ended 06/30/2016
	Advances			Investments			Mortgage Loans			Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes			Consolidated Obligation Bonds			Total
Impact of derivatives and hedging activities in net interest income:
Net amortization/accretion of hedging activities	$	(2,424	)	$	—		$	(1,132	)	$	—		$	—		$	(3,556	)
Net interest received (paid)	(46,768		)	(5,337		)	—			(45		)	20,561			(31,589		)
Subtotal	(49,192		)	(5,337		)	(1,132		)	(45		)	20,561			(35,145		)
Net gain (loss) on derivatives and hedging activities:
Fair value hedges:
Interest rate swaps	(309		)	(3,108		)	—			(277		)	(616		)	(4,310		)
Economic hedges – unrealized gain (loss) due to fair value changes:
Interest rate swaps	—			(67,499		)	—			(4		)	2,874			(64,629		)
Interest rate caps	—			(3,716		)	—			—			—			(3,716		)
Mortgage delivery commitments	—			—			2,988			—			—			2,988
Economic hedges – net interest received (paid)	—			(26,633		)	—			4			2,514			(24,115		)
Subtotal	(309		)	(100,956		)	2,988			(277		)	4,772			(93,782		)
Net impact of derivatives and hedging activities	(49,501		)	(106,293		)	1,856			(322		)	25,333			(128,927		)
Net gain (loss) on trading securities hedged on an economic basis with derivatives	—			67,899			—			—			—			67,899
TOTAL	$	(49,501	)	$	(38,394	)	$	1,856		$	(322	)	$	25,333		$	(61,028	)

60

Table 12

	Six Months Ended 06/30/2015
	Advances			Investments			Mortgage Loans			Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes		Consolidated Obligation Bonds			Total
Impact of derivatives and hedging activities in net interest income:
Net amortization/accretion of hedging activities	$	(4,181	)	$	—		$	(892	)	$	—	$	(4	)	$	(5,077	)
Net interest received (paid)	(60,867		)	—			—			59		38,973			(21,835		)
Subtotal	(65,048		)	—			(892		)	59		38,969			(26,912		)
Net gain (loss) on derivatives and hedging activities:
Fair value hedges:
Interest rate swaps	512			—			—			43		(1,980		)	(1,425		)
Economic hedges – unrealized gain (loss) due to fair value changes:
Interest rate swaps	—			23,232			—			—		(2,206		)	21,026
Interest rate caps/floors	—			(1,341		)	—			—		—			(1,341		)
Mortgage delivery commitments	—			—			(476		)	—		—			(476		)
Economic hedges – net interest received (paid)	—			(23,102		)	—			—		3,672			(19,430		)
Subtotal	512			(1,211		)	(476		)	43		(514		)	(1,646		)
Net impact of derivatives and hedging activities	(64,536		)	(1,211		)	(1,368		)	102		38,455			(28,558		)
Net gain (loss) on trading securities hedged on an economic basis with derivatives	—			(26,116		)	—			—		—			(26,116		)
TOTAL	$	(64,536	)	$	(27,327	)	$	(1,368	)	$	102	$	38,455		$	(54,674	)

As reflected in Tables 9through12, the majority of the derivative net unrealized gains and losses are related to economic hedges, such as interest rate swaps matched to GSE debentures or MBS classified as trading securities and interest rate caps and floors, which do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under GAAP. Net interest payments or receipts on these economic hedges flow through net gain (loss) on derivatives and hedging activities instead of net interest income, which distorts yields, especially for trading investments that are swapped to variable rates. Ineffectiveness on fair value hedges contributes to unrealized gains and losses on derivatives, but to a much lesser degree. In the past, we generally recorded net unrealized gains on derivatives when the overall level of interest rates would rise over the period and recorded net unrealized losses when the overall level of interest rates would fall over the period, due to the mix of the economic hedges. However, the mix of our economic hedges changed in mid-2015, so the general level of interest rates will no longer be the primary factor impacting the net unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives. Net unrealized gains or losses on derivatives will continue to be a function of the general level of LIBOR swap rates and the spread between the LIBOR swap curve and the GSE interest rate curve (interest rates swaps that are economic hedges of GSE debentures held in trading), but will also be affected by the spread between the LIBOR swap curve and mortgage rates (interest rates swaps that are economic hedges of fixed rate GSE MBS held in trading).

61

For the three- and six- months period endedJune 30, 2016, net unrealized gains and losses on derivatives and hedging activities decreased net income by $39.6 million and $92.1 million, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2015. Increases in swap spreads towards the end of 2015 and into the first half of 2016 caused fair value decreases for many of our derivatives, but especially interest rate swaps economically hedging multi-family GSE MBS recorded as trading securities, resulting in unrealized losses of $19.7 million and $55.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. The fair values of the swapped MBS investments increased as a result of a decrease in interest rates, resulting in unrealized gains of $17.5 million and $56.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, which are recorded in net gain (loss) on trading securities. All of these multi-family GSE MBS and associated interest rate swaps were purchased or entered into after May 2015 and are expected to create more income statement volatility than the interest rate swaps and related trading GSE debentures due to the relatively long length of the contracts and their relationship with mortgage rates, which tend to be more volatile than rates on GSE debentures. Unrealized losses of $1.1 million and $11.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, were attributable to the fair value changes of our interest rate swaps matched to GSE debentures as a result of the passage of time, as several derivatives approached maturity (reducing the overall loss position of the derivatives) and changes in interest rates for their respective maturities (pay fixed rate swap) and increases in three-month LIBOR (receive variable rate swap), but these decreases were offset by unrealized gains of $1.1 million and $11.1 million attributable to the swapped GSE debentures, which are recorded in net gain (loss) on trading securities. Tables 13 and 14 present the relationship between the swapped trading securities and the associated interest rate swaps that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment by investment type (in thousands):

Table 13

	Three Months Ended
	06/30/2016								06/30/2015
	Gain (Loss) on Derivatives			Gain (Loss) on Trading Securities		Net			Gain (Loss) on Derivatives			Gain (Loss) on Trading Securities			Net
GSE debentures	$	(1,119	)	$	1,103	$	(16	)	$	18,193		$	(20,222	)	$	(2,029	)
GSE MBS	(19,741		)	17,479		(2,262		)	(421		)	(125		)	(546		)
TOTAL	$	(20,860	)	$	18,582	$	(2,278	)	$	17,772		$	(20,347	)	$	(2,575	)

Table 14

	Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016								06/30/2015
	Gain (Loss) on Derivatives			Gain (Loss) on Trading Securities		Net			Gain (Loss) on Derivatives			Gain (Loss) on Trading Securities			Net
GSE debentures	$	(11,626	)	$	11,148	$	(478	)	$	23,653		$	(25,991	)	$	(2,338	)
GSE MBS	(55,873		)	56,751		878			(421		)	(125		)	(546		)
TOTAL	$	(67,499	)	$	67,899	$	400		$	23,232		$	(26,116	)	$	(2,884	)

See Tables 41 and 42 under Item 3 – “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” for additional detail regarding notional and fair value amounts of derivative instruments.

62

Net Gain (Loss) on Trading Securities: All unrealized gains and losses related to trading securities are recorded in other income (loss) as net gain (loss) on trading securities; however, only gains and losses relating to trading securities that are related to economic hedges are included in Tables 9through12. Unrealized gains (losses) fluctuate as the fair value of our trading portfolio fluctuates. There are a number of factors that can impact the fair value of a trading security including the movement in interest rates, changes in credit spreads, the passage of time, and changes in price volatility. Table 15 presents the major components of the net gain (loss) on trading securities (in thousands):

Table 15

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016			06/30/2015			06/30/2016			06/30/2015
Trading securities not hedged:
GSE debentures	$	81		$	24		$	210		$	13
U.S. Treasury note	—			(6		)	—			(16		)
U.S. obligation and GSE MBS	(137		)	(43		)	(379		)	(96		)
Short-term money market securities	—			1			—			—
Total trading securities not hedged	(56		)	(24		)	(169		)	(99		)
Trading securities hedged on an economic basis with derivatives:
GSE debentures	1,103			(20,222		)	11,148			(25,991		)
GSE MBS	17,479			(125		)	56,751			(125		)
Total trading securities hedged on an economic basis with derivatives	18,582			(20,347		)	67,899			(26,116		)
TOTAL	$	18,526		$	(20,371	)	$	67,730		$	(26,215	)

Our trading portfolio is comprised primarily of fixed rate GSE debentures and fixed rate multi-family GSE MBS, with a small percentage of variable rate GSE debentures and variable rate GSE MBS. In general, the fixed rate securities are related to economic hedges in the form of interest rate swaps that convert fixed rates to variable rates (see Tables 13 and 14for the association between the gains (losses) on the fixed rate securities and the related economic hedges). The fair values of the GSE debentures are affected by changes in intermediate interest rates (e.g., two-year to four-year rates) and are swapped to three-month LIBOR. The fair values of the multi-family GSE MBS are affected by changes in mortgage rates and the fixed rate securities are swapped to one-month LIBOR. A decrease in intermediate interest rates during the first half of 2016 resulted in additional unrealized gains on the GSE debentures that were partially offset by narrowing in some GSE credit spreads. Decreases in mortgage interest rates resulted in unrealized gains on our fixed rate multi-family GSE MBS. In addition to interest rates and credit spreads, the value of these securities is affected by time decay. The fixed rate GSE debentures possess coupons that are well above current market rates for similar securities and, therefore, are currently valued at substantial premiums. As these securities approach maturity, their prices will converge to par resulting in a decrease in their current premium price (i.e., time decay). Given that the variable rate GSE debentures re-price monthly, they generally account for a very small portion of the net gain (loss) on trading securities unless current market spreads on these variable rate securities diverge from the spreads at the time of our acquisition of the securities.

Other Expenses: Operating expenses, which include compensation and benefits and other operating expenses, remained relatively flat at $13.0 million and $24.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to $12.4 million and $24.0 million for the same periods in the prior year. The largest component of operating expenses, compensation and benefits, increased by $0.6 million, or 7.6 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the prior year period, and increased $0.3 million, or 2.1 percent, for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the prior year period. The increases in compensation were due to the hiring of additional employees and an increase in the base salaries of existing employees, with a corresponding increase in incentive compensation. We expect future increases in this expense as we add positions over the next several years, but our pace of hiring is expected to slow.

63

Non-GAAP Measures: We fulfill our mission by: (1) providing liquidity to our members through the offering of advances to finance housing, economic development and community lending; (2) supporting residential mortgage lending through the MPF Program and purchases of MBS; and (3) providing regional affordable housing programs that create housing opportunities for low- and moderate-income families. In order to effectively accomplish our mission, we must obtain adequate funding amounts at acceptable interest rate levels. We use derivatives as tools to reduce our funding costs and manage interest rate risk and prepayment risk. We also acquire and classify certain investments as trading securities for liquidity and asset-liability management purposes. Although we manage the risks mentioned and utilize these transactions for asset-liability tools, we do not manage the fluctuations in the fair value of our derivatives or trading securities. We are essentially a “hold-to-maturity” investor and transact derivatives only for hedging purposes, even though some derivative hedging relationships do not qualify for hedge accounting under GAAP (referred to as economic hedges) and therefore can add significant volatility to our GAAP net income.

Adjusted income is a non-GAAP measure used by management to evaluate the quality of our ongoing earnings. We believe that the presentation of adjusted income as measured for management purposes enhances the understanding of our performance by highlighting our underlying results and profitability. By removing volatility created by fair value fluctuations and items such as prepayment fees, we can compare longer-term trends in earnings that might otherwise be indeterminable.

Although we calculate our non-GAAP financial measures consistently from period to period using appropriate GAAP components, non-GAAP financial measures are not required to be uniformly applied and are not audited. These non-GAAP measures are frequently used by FHLBank’s stakeholders in the evaluation of our performance, but they have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analyses of results as reported under GAAP.

Adjusted net income increased $4.7 million and $10.1 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same periods in the prior year (see Table 16). The increase was due to increased adjusted net interest income, which includes the impact of net interest settlements on derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting. Tables 16 and 17 present a reconciliation of GAAP net income to adjusted income and GAAP net interest income to adjusted net interest income (in thousands):

Table 16

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016			06/30/2015			06/30/2016			06/30/2015
Net income, as reported under GAAP	$	31,702		$	26,560		$	72,176		$	57,681
AHP assessments	3,526			2,952			8,024			6,411
Income before AHP assessments	35,228			29,512			80,200			64,092
Derivative (gains) losses1	23,425			(14,196		)	69,667			(17,784		)
Trading (gains) losses	(18,526		)	20,371			(67,730		)	26,215
Prepayment fees on terminated advances	(120		)	(332		)	(609		)	(1,088		)
Total excluded items	4,779			5,843			1,328			7,343
Adjusted income (a non-GAAP measure)	$	40,007		$	35,355		$	81,528		$	71,435

¹  Consists of fair value changes on derivatives and hedging activities excluding net interest settlements (see next table) on derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting.

Table 17

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016			06/30/2015			06/30/2016			06/30/2015
Net interest income, as reported under GAAP	$	64,182		$	57,150		$	129,052		$	113,764
Net interest settlements on derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting	(11,871		)	(9,879		)	(24,115		)	(19,430		)
Adjusted net interest income (a non-GAAP measure)	$	52,311		$	47,271		$	104,937		$	94,334

64

Table 18 presents a comparison of adjusted ROE (a non-GAAP financial measure) to the average overnight Federal funds rate, which we use as a key measure of effective utilization and management of members’ capital. The slight decrease in adjusted ROE between the comparative periods is mostly a function of increases in average capital as a result of the increase in advances. Adjusted ROE spread for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 is calculated as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):

Table18

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016			06/30/2015			06/30/2016			06/30/2015
Average GAAP total capital for the period	$	2,189,319		$	1,916,341		$	2,140,929		$	1,846,938
ROE, based upon GAAP net income	5.82		%	5.56		%	6.78		%	6.30		%
Adjusted ROE, based upon adjusted income	7.35		%	7.40		%	7.66		%	7.80		%
Average overnight Federal funds effective rate	0.37		%	0.13		%	0.37		%	0.12		%
Adjusted ROE as a spread to average overnight Federal funds effective rate	6.98		%	7.27		%	7.29		%	7.68		%

Financial Condition

Overall:Total assets increased $2.1 billion, or 4.6 percent, from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016. This increase was due primarily to a $2.6 billion, or 11.0 percent, increase in advances, mostly in our line of credit advance product. This growth is attributed to the increase in dividend rates (discussed below), which effectively reduces the cost of our advances to our members and increases our members' ability to profitably deploy the funding. We have been actively promoting the impact of our Class B Common Stock dividend on the effective borrowing cost of advances to increase member awareness of the benefit of higher dividends. Changes in interest rates could reduce the benefit of these short-term advances to our members, which could cause a significant decline in advances. Cash and short-term investments decreased $1.3 billion from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016 as a result of a higher amount of advance repayments at the end of the year compared to the amount of advance repayments received at June 30, 2016, and shifting short-term investments into long-term investment securities. The balance of long-term investment securities increased $0.7 billion from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016.

As a percentage of assets at June 30, 2016 compared to December 31, 2015, advances and investment securities increased while cash, short-term investments, and mortgage loans decreased. Our mortgage loan portfolio grew slightly but declined as a percentage of assets because of the 11.0 percent growth in advances. In terms of liabilities, the distribution between discount notes and consolidated obligation bonds has shifted as a result of asset composition, but we have also adjusted our debt composition to a higher percentage of lower-cost discount notes as a result of market conditions that have increased the cost of consolidated obligations swapped or indexed to LIBOR. Table 19 presents the percentage concentration of the major components of our Statements of Condition:

65

Table 19

	Component Concentration
	06/30/2016		12/31/2015
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	0.5	%	1.5	%
Interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell and Federal funds sold	11.1		13.6
Investment securities	17.8		17.0
Advances	56.3		53.1
Mortgage loans, net	13.9		14.4
Other assets	0.4		0.4
Total assets	100.0	%	100.0	%
Liabilities:
Deposits	1.4	%	1.7	%
Consolidated obligation discount notes, net	57.8		49.1
Consolidated obligation bonds, net	36.0		44.7
Other liabilities	0.4		0.3
Total liabilities	95.6		95.8
Capital:
Capital stock outstanding	2.9		2.7
Retained earnings	1.5		1.5
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	—		—
Total capital	4.4		4.2
Total liabilities and capital	100.0	%	100.0	%

66

Table 20 presents changes in the major components of our Statements of Condition (dollar amounts in thousands):

Table 20

	Increase (Decrease) in Components
	06/30/2016 vs. 12/31/2015
	Dollar Change			Percent Change
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	(468,647	)	(68.6	)%
Investments1	(161,491		)	(1.2	)
Advances	2,602,191			11.0
Mortgage loans, net	81,891			1.3
Derivative assets, net	10,156			19.7
Other assets	903			0.8
Total assets	$	2,065,003		4.6	%
Liabilities:
Deposits	$	(98,011	)	(12.9	)%
Consolidated obligations, net	1,962,188			4.7
Derivative liabilities, net	16,471			52.3
Other liabilities	9,336			8.2
Total liabilities	1,889,984			4.4
Capital:
Capital stock outstanding	138,333			11.4
Retained earnings	33,247			5.1
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	3,439			18.1
Total capital	175,019			9.5
Total liabilities and capital	$	2,065,003		4.6	%

¹    Investments also include interest-bearing deposits, Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell.

Advances: Our advance products are developed, as authorized in the Bank Act and in regulations established by the Finance Agency, to meet the specific liquidity and term funding needs of our members. As a wholesale provider of funds, we compete with brokered certificates of deposit and security repurchase agreements. We strive to price our advances relative to our marginal cost of funds while trying to remain competitive with the wholesale funding markets. While there is typically less competition in the long-term maturities, member demand for advances in these maturities has historically been lower than the demand for advances with short- and medium-term maturities. Nonetheless, long-term advances are also priced at relatively low spreads to our cost of funds.

67

Table 21 summarizes advances outstanding by product (dollar amounts in thousands):

Table 21

	06/30/2016				12/31/2015
	Dollar		Percent		Dollar		Percent
Adjustable rate:
Standard advance products:
Line of credit	$	10,517,259	40.5	%	$	8,464,599	36.1	%
Regular adjustable rate advances	85,000		0.3		140,000		0.6
Adjustable rate callable advances	6,416,985		24.7		6,125,760		26.1
Customized advances:
Adjustable rate advances with embedded caps or floors	—		—		30,000		0.1
Standard housing and community development advances:
Adjustable rate callable advances	100,533		0.4		87,533		0.4
Total adjustable rate advances	17,119,777		65.9		14,847,892		63.3
Fixed rate:
Standard advance products:
Short-term fixed rate advances	455,965		1.7		408,126		1.7
Regular fixed rate advances	5,587,291		21.5		5,392,625		23.0
Fixed rate callable advances	75,445		0.3		75,445		0.3
Standard housing and community development advances:
Regular fixed rate advances	389,764		1.5		378,044		1.6
Fixed rate callable advances	4,000		—		2,000		—
Total fixed rate advances	6,512,465		25.0		6,256,240		26.6
Convertible:
Standard advance products:
Fixed rate convertible advances	1,479,942		5.7		1,472,842		6.3
Amortizing:
Standard advance products:
Fixed rate amortizing advances	419,025		1.6		429,440		1.8
Fixed rate callable amortizing advances	24,654		0.1		28,796		0.1
Standard housing and community development advances:
Fixed rate amortizing advances	438,064		1.7		431,251		1.9
Fixed rate callable amortizing advances	9,810		—		7,213		—
Total amortizing advances	891,553		3.4		896,700		3.8
TOTAL PAR VALUE	$	26,003,737	100.0	%	$	23,473,674	100.0	%

Note that an individual advance may be reclassified to a different product type between periods due to the occurrence of a triggering event such as the passing of a call date (i.e., from fixed rate callable advance to regular fixed rate advance) or conversion of an advance (i.e., from fixed rate convertible advance to adjustable rate callable advance).

Advances are one of the primary ways we fulfill our mission of providing liquidity to our members and constituted the largest component of our balance sheet at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The 10.8 percentincrease in advance par value from December 31, 2015 (see Table 21) was due to a significant increase in our line of credit product as well as a small increase in regular fixed rate advances. The increase in our line of credit product was largely a result of efforts to promote the pricing advantages of advances when taking into consideration our dividend rates paid on member capital stock supporting advances. Changes in interest rates could reduce the benefit of these short-term advances to our members, which could cause a significant decline in advances. We expect advances as a percent of total assets to continue to increase as part of our core mission asset focus and continued efforts to promote awareness of the benefits of higher dividends (see “Executive Level Overview”under this Item 2), but we cannot predict member demand for our advance products.

68

As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, 66.2 percent and 65.9 percent, respectively, of our members carried outstanding advance balances. The overall demand for our advances can typically be attributed to the demand for loans that our depository members are experiencing in their communities and their ability to fund those loans with deposit growth. It is also influenced by our insurance company members’ need for operational liquidity and the ability of both depository and insurance company members to profitably invest advance funding. The growth in advances experienced since the latter half of 2014 is a result of a smaller number of large members increasing short-term advances, including line of credit advances, due to lower effective borrowing costs when considering the increase in the dividend rate on our Class B Common Stock during 2014. Advances with many members could decline or remain flat until greater levels of funding can be reallocated from short-term liquid assets into higher-yielding loans or assets. If members reduce the volume of their advances, we expect to continue our past practice of repurchasing excess capital stock. In addition, when, and if, member advance demand changes, a few larger members could have a significant impact on the amount of total outstanding advances, much like what has occurred since the latter half of 2014.

Rather than match funding long-term, fixed rate, large dollar advances, we elect to swap a significant portion of large dollar advances with longer maturities to short-term indices (one‑ or three‑month LIBOR) to synthetically create adjustable rate advances. When coupled with the volume of our short-term advances, advances that effectively re-price at least every three months represent 86.0 percent and 84.7 percent of our total advance portfolio as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Table 22 presents information on our five largest borrowers (dollar amounts in thousands). We have rights to collateral with an estimated fair value in excess of the book value of these advances and, therefore, do not expect to incur any credit losses on these advances.

Table 22

	06/30/2016				12/31/2015
Borrower Name	Advance Par Value		Percent ofTotal Advance Par		Advance Par Value		Percent ofTotal Advance Par
Bank of Oklahoma, NA	$	5,800,000	22.3	%	$	4,800,000	20.5	%
MidFirst Bank	4,405,000		16.9		3,779,000		16.1
Capitol Federal Savings Bank	2,475,000		9.5		2,475,000		10.5
United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.	751,755		2.9		735,909		3.1
Security Benefit Life Insurance Co.	730,000		2.8		1,081,500		4.6
TOTAL	$	14,161,755	54.4	%	$	12,871,409	54.8	%

Table 23 presents the interest income associated with the five borrowers with the highest interest income for the periods presented (dollar amounts in thousands).

Table 23

	Three Months Ended
	06/30/2016				06/30/2015
Borrower Name	Advance Income		Percent of Total Advance Income1		Advance Income		Percent of Total Advance Income1
Capitol Federal Savings Bank	$	16,092	20.3	%	$	16,144	25.3	%
Bank of Oklahoma, NA	8,253		10.4		2,590		4.1
MidFirst Bank	5,687		7.2		2,869		4.5
American Fidelity Assurance Co.	4,027		5.1		4,367		6.9
United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.	1,925		2.4		1,610		2.5
TOTAL	$	35,984	45.4	%	$	27,580	43.3	%

¹  Total advance income by borrower excludes net interest settlements on derivatives hedging the advances. Total advance income for all borrowers is net of interest receipts/(payments) on derivatives hedging advances of $(22.6) million and $(30.2) million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

69

Table 24 presents the accrued interest income associated with the five borrowers providing the highest amount of interest income for the periods presented (dollar amounts in thousands).

Table 24

	Six Months Ended
	06/30/2016				06/30/2015
Borrower Name	Advance Income		Percent of Total Advance Income1		Advance Income		Percent of Total Advance Income1
Capitol Federal Savings Bank	$	32,203	20.5	%	$	32,269	25.7	%
Bank of Oklahoma, NA	15,610		10.0		4,513		3.6
MidFirst Bank	11,331		7.2		5,458		4.3
American Fidelity Assurance Co.	8,081		5.2		8,645		6.9
United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.	3,801		2.4		3,172		2.5
TOTAL	$	71,026	45.3	%	$	54,057	43.0	%

¹  Total advance income by borrower excludes net interest settlements on derivatives hedging the advances. Total advance income for all borrowers is net of interest receipts/(payments) on derivatives hedging advances of $(46.8) million and $(60.9) million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Table 4 presents the amount of interest income on advances as a percentage of total interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

MPF Program: The MPF Program is considered an attractive secondary mortgage market alternative for our members, especially the smaller institutions in our district. We participate in the MPF Program through the MPF Provider, a division of FHLBank of Chicago. Under the MPF Program, participating members can sell us conventional and government fixed rate, size-conforming, single-family residential mortgage loans.

The principal amount of new mortgage loans acquired and held on balance sheet from our PFIs during the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $0.5 billion. These new originations and acquisitions, net of loan payments received, resulted in an increase of 1.3 percent in the outstanding net balance of our mortgage loan portfolio from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016. Net mortgage loans as a percentage of total assets decreased from 14.4 percent as of December 31, 2015 to 13.9 percent as of June 30, 2016. Table 4 presents the amount of interest income on mortgage loans held for portfolio as a percentage of total interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

The primary factors that may influence future growth in mortgage loans held for portfolio include: (1) the number of new and delivering PFIs; (2) the mortgage loan origination volume of current PFIs; (3) refinancing activity; (4) the level of interest rates and the shape of the yield curve; (5) the relative competitiveness of MPF pricing to the prices offered by other buyers of residential mortgage loans; and (6) a PFI's level of excess risk-based capital relative to the required risk-based capital charge associated with the PFI's CE obligations on MPF mortgage loans. In an effort to manage the level of mortgage loans on our books, management has researched and continues to review options including participating loan volume or selling whole loans to other FHLBanks, members or other investors. As described below, we have pursued participations and, although we may determine to sell whole loans from time to time, we have not identified any specific loans to be sold as of June 30, 2016.

Historically, we have used the MPF Xtra product and mortgage loan participations with another FHLBank to effectively restrict the growth in mortgage loans held for portfolio and provide management with adequate means to control the amount of mortgage loan portfolio volume retained on our balance sheet to maintain our desired asset composition. The MPF Xtra product is a structure where our PFIs sell mortgage loans to FHLBank of Chicago and simultaneously to Fannie Mae. We have also recently began offering an MPF Government MBS product that similarly allows our PFIs to sell mortgages to FHLBank Chicago that are pooled into Ginnie Mae securities. Both products are intended to enhance our ability to manage mortgage volumes and receive a counterparty fee from FHLBank Chicago based on mortgage volumes sold by our PFIs. While we discontinued our mortgage loan participations with another FHLBank in the first quarter of 2014 because of lower origination volumes with PFIs, we have the authority to offer participation interests in risk sharing MPF loan pools to member institutions, which may further enhance our ability to manage the size of our mortgage loan portfolio in the future.

70

The number of approved PFIs was 276 and 279 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we purchased loans from 165 PFIs with no one PFI accounting for more than 6.5 percent of the total dollar volume purchased. Although there is no guarantee, we anticipate that the number of PFIs delivering loans will increase during 2016 as we continue to educate our members about the improved execution and relative ease of use associated with the MPF Program. Table 25 presents the outstanding balances of mortgage loans sold to us, net of participations, from our top five PFIs and the percentage of those loans to total mortgage loans outstanding (dollar amounts in thousands).

Table 25

	06/30/2016				12/31/2015
	Mortgage Loan Balance		Percentof Total Mortgage Loans		Mortgage Loan Balance		Percentof Total Mortgage Loans
FirstBank of Colorado	$	255,643	4.0	%	$	245,842	3.9	%
Tulsa Teachers Credit Union	222,765		3.5		206,081		3.3
Mutual of Omaha Bank	175,777		2.8		194,606		3.1
SAC Federal Credit Union	141,670		2.2		146,228		2.3
Girard National Bank	117,547		1.8		120,846		1.9
TOTAL	$	913,402	14.3	%	$	913,603	14.5	%

Two indications of credit quality are scores provided by Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO^®) and loan-to-value (LTV) ratios. FICO is a widely used credit industry indicator to assess borrower credit quality with scores typically ranging from 300 to 850 with the low end of the scale indicating greater credit risk. The MPF Program requires a minimum FICO score of 620 for all conventional loans. LTV is a primary variable in credit performance. Generally speaking, a higher LTV ratio means greater risk of loss in the event of a default and also means higher loss severity. The weighted average FICO score and LTV recorded at origination for conventional mortgage loans outstanding as of June 30, 2016 was 750 and 73.8 percent, respectively. See Note 6 of the Notes to Financial Statements under Item 1 for additional information regarding credit quality indicators.

Allowance for Credit Losses on Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio – The decrease in the allowance for credit losses and the decrease in the allowance balance as a percent of UPB as of June 30, 2016 were primarily attributable to improvements in credit quality during the period, increases in property values, and a decline in the historical loss factor. The historical loss factor decreases as larger losses realized in older periods roll off or are offset by gains in more current periods in the historical average calculation. We believe that policies and procedures are in place to effectively manage the credit risk on mortgage loans held in portfolio. See Note 6 of the Notes to Financial Statements under Item 1 for a summary of the allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans, and delinquency aging and key credit quality indicators for our mortgage loan portfolio.

Investments: Investments are used to provide liquidity and primary and secondary market support for the U.S. housing securities market. Total investments decreased 1.2 percent from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016 largely due to a decrease in short-term investments due to the influx of cash that often occurs at the end of the year, the majority of which was invested in reverse repurchase agreements at December 31, 2015. The decrease in short-term investments was partially offset by an increase in MBS and other long-term securities, which coincided with the increase in advances and mortgage loans, as growth in core mission assets allows for growth in non-mission assets while maintaining our desired core mission assets ratio. Consistent with Finance Agency guidance, we define investment quality as a security with adequate financial backings so that full and timely payment of principal and interest on such security is expected and there is minimal risk that the timely payment of principal and interest would not occur because of adverse changes in economic and financial conditions during the projected life of the security.

Short-term Investments – Short-term investments, which are used to provide funds to meet the credit needs of our members, maintain liquidity, and meet other financial obligations such as debt servicing, consist primarily of reverse repurchase agreements, interest-bearing deposits, overnight Federal funds sold, term Federal funds sold, certificates of deposit and commercial paper. The Bank Act and Finance Agency regulations and guidelines set liquidity requirements for us, and our board of directors has adopted additional liquidity policies. In addition, we maintain a contingency liquidity plan in the event of financial market disruptions. See “Risk Management – Liquidity Risk Management” under this Item 2 for a discussion of our liquidity management.

71

Within our portfolio of short-term investments, we face credit risk from unsecured exposures. Our short-term unsecured credit investments have maturities generally ranging between overnight and three months and include the following types:

• Interest-bearing deposits. Unsecured deposits that earn interest.

• Federal funds sold. Unsecured loans of reserve balances at the Federal Reserve Banks between financial institutions that are made on either an overnight or term basis.

• Commercial paper. Unsecured debt issued by corporations, typically for the financing of accounts receivable, inventories, and meeting short-term liabilities.

• Certificates of deposit. Unsecured negotiable promissory notes issued by banks and payable to the bearer at maturity.

Table 26 presents the carrying value of our unsecured credit exposure with private counterparties by investment type (in thousands). The unsecured investment credit exposure presented may not reflect the average or maximum exposure during the period as the balances presented reflect the balances at period end.

Table 26

	06/30/2016		12/31/2015
Interest-bearing deposits	$	369,000	$	100,000
Federal funds sold	1,823,000		2,000,000
TOTAL UNSECURED INVESTMENT CREDIT EXPOSURE1	$	2,192,000	$	2,100,000

¹  Excludes unsecured investment credit exposure to U.S. government, U.S. government agencies, instrumentalities, GSEs and supranational entities and does not include related accrued interest.

We actively monitor our credit exposures and the credit quality of our counterparties, including an assessment of each counterparty’s financial performance, capital adequacy, sovereign support and the current market perceptions of the counterparties. General macro-economic, political and market conditions may also be considered when deciding on unsecured exposure. As a result, we may further limit existing exposures.

Finance Agency regulations: (1) include limits on the amount of unsecured credit an individual FHLBank may extend to a counterparty or to a group of affiliated counterparties; (2) permit us to extend additional unsecured credit for overnight extensions of credit, subject to limitations; and (3) prohibit us from investing in financial instruments issued by non-U.S. entities other than those issued by U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks. For additional information on our management of unsecured credit exposure, see Item 7 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition – Investments” in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. As of June 30, 2016, we were in compliance with all Finance Agency regulations relating to unsecured credit exposure.

We manage our credit risk by conducting pre-purchase credit due diligence and on-going surveillance described previously and generally investing in unsecured investments of highly-rated counterparties. From time to time, we extend unsecured credit to qualified members by investing in overnight Federal funds issued by them. In general, we treat members as any other market participant. However, since they are members and we have more access to specific financial information about our members, we have a lower capital requirement than for non-members, but members must still meet our credit ratings requirements. As of June 30, 2016, all unsecured investments were rated as investment grade based on NRSROs (see Table 30).

72

Table 27 presents the amount of our unsecured investment credit exposure by remaining contractual maturity and by the domicile of the counterparty or the domicile of the counterparty’s parent for U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks as of June 30, 2016 (in thousands). We also mitigate the credit risk on investments by generally investing in investments that have short-term maturities.

Table 27

Domicile of Counterparty	Overnight
Domestic	$	369,000
U.S. subsidiaries of foreign commercial banks	250,000
Total domestic and U.S. subsidiaries of foreign commercial banks	619,000
U.S. Branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks:
Canada	493,000
Netherlands	380,000
Germany	350,000
Norway	350,000
Total U.S. Branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks	1,573,000
TOTAL UNSECURED INVESTMENT CREDIT EXPOSURE1	$	2,192,000

¹  Excludes unsecured investment credit exposure to U.S. government, U.S. government agencies, instrumentalities, GSEs and supranational entities, and does not include related accrued interest.

Unsecured credit exposure continues to be cautiously placed, with exposure concentrated in the United States, Germany, Canada, Netherlands, and the Nordic countries. In addition, we anticipate continued future investment in reverse repurchase agreements, which are secured investments, and limiting unsecured exposure, especially to foreign financial institutions, as long as the interest rates are comparable. To enhance our liquidity position, we classify our unsecured short-term investment securities in our trading portfolio, which allows us to sell these securities if necessary.

Long-term investments – Our long-term investment portfolio consists primarily of GSE debentures, MBS and state housing finance agency securities. Our Risk Management Policy (RMP) restricts the acquisition of investments to highly rated long-term securities. The majority of these long-term securities are GSE MBS, which provide an alternative means to promote liquidity in the mortgage finance markets while providing acceptable returns. GSE debentures are the other significant investment class that we hold in our long-term investment portfolio. The majority of our unsecured GSE debentures are fixed rate bonds, which are swapped from fixed to variable rates. They provide attractive returns, can serve as excellent collateral (e.g., repurchase agreements and net derivatives exposure), and are generally classified as trading securities and carried at fair value, either to enhance our liquidity position, for asset/liability management purposes, or to provide a fair value offset to the gains or losses on the interest rate swaps tied to these securities. The interest rate swaps do not qualify for hedge accounting, which results in the net interest payments or receipts on these economic hedges flowing through net gain (loss) on derivatives and hedging activities instead of net interest income.

According to Finance Agency regulation codified at 12 C.F.R. §1267.3, no additional MBS purchases can be made if the amortized cost of our mortgage securities exceeds 300 percent of our regulatory capital. Further, quarterly increases in holdings of mortgage securities are restricted to no more than 50 percent of regulatory capital. As of June 30, 2016, the amortized cost of our MBS portfolio represented 327 percent of our regulatory capital; however, we were in compliance with the regulatory limit at the time of each purchase during the current quarter. As of June 30, 2016, we held $1.0 billion of par value in MBS in our trading portfolio and $1.0 billion of par value in MBS in our available-for-sale portfolio. The majority of the MBS in both portfolios are fixed rate GSE securities, which are swapped from fixed to variable rates.

Major Security Types – Securities for which we have the ability and intent to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity securities and recorded at carrying value, which is the net total of par, premiums, discounts and credit and non-credit OTTI discounts. We classify certain investments as trading or available-for-sale securities and carry them at fair value. Securities acquired as asset/liability management tools to manage duration risk, which are likely to be sold when the duration risk is no longer present, are classified as trading or available-for-sale securities. Changes in the fair values of investments classified as trading are recorded through other income and original premiums/discounts on these investments are not amortized. We do not actively trade any of these securities with the intent of realizing gains; most often, they are held until maturity or call date.

73

Traditionally, if fixed rate securities were hedged with interest rate swaps, we would classify the securities as trading investments so that the changes in fair values of both the derivatives hedging the securities and the hedged securities are recorded in other income. However, during the third quarter of 2015, we began classifying our swapped fixed rate multi-family GSE MBS as available-for-sale and designating the corresponding interest rate swaps as fair value benchmark hedges. See Note 3 of the Notes to Financial Statements under Item 1 to this report for additional information on our different investment classifications including what types of securities are held under each classification. The carrying value of our investments is summarized by security type in Table 28 (in thousands).

Table 28

	06/30/2016		12/31/2015
Trading securities:
GSE debentures	$	1,493,441	$	1,338,639
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. obligation MBS	744		801
GSE MBS	1,000,778		955,166
Total trading securities	2,494,963		2,294,606
Available-for-sale securities:
GSE MBS	1,057,923		495,063
Total available-for-sale securities	1,057,923		495,063
Held-to-maturity securities:
State or local housing agency obligations	109,590		111,655
Mortgage-backed or asset-backed securities:
U.S. obligation MBS	42,822		47,234
GSE MBS	4,412,962		4,452,533
Private-label residential MBS	138,068		159,395
Total held-to-maturity securities	4,703,442		4,770,817
Total securities	8,256,328		7,560,486
Interest-bearing deposits	371,834		100,594
Federal funds sold	1,823,000		2,000,000
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	2,993,427		3,945,000
TOTAL INVESTMENTS	$	13,444,589	$	13,606,080

74

The contractual maturities of our investments are summarized by security type in Table 29 (dollar amounts in thousands). Expected maturities of certain securities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment fees.

Table 29

	06/30/2016
	Due in one year or less			Due after oneyear throughfive years			Due after fiveyears through 10 years			Due after 10 years			Carrying Value
Trading securities:
GSE debentures	$	512,479		$	549,098		$	431,864		$	—		$	1,493,441
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. obligation MBS	—			—			—			744			744
GSE MBS	—			—			680,950			319,828			1,000,778
Total trading securities	512,479			549,098			1,112,814			320,572			2,494,963
Yield on trading securities	5.36		%	1.50		%	2.86		%	2.61		%
Available-for-sale securities:
GSE MBS	—			—			782,487			275,436			1,057,923
Total available-for-sale securities	—			—			782,487			275,436			1,057,923
Yield on available-for-sale securities	—		%	—		%	2.39		%	2.92		%
Held-to-maturity securities:
State or local housing agency obligations	—			2,990			11,205			95,395			109,590
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. obligation MBS	—			—			—			42,822			42,822
GSE MBS	—			276,004			1,784,364			2,352,594			4,412,962
Private-label residential MBS	—			12,086			3,045			122,937			138,068
Total held-to-maturity securities	—			291,080			1,798,614			2,613,748			4,703,442
Yield on held-to-maturity securities	—		%	1.27		%	1.58		%	1.50		%
Total securities	512,479			840,178			3,693,915			3,209,756			8,256,328
Yield on total securities	5.36		%	1.42		%	2.12		%	1.73		%
Interest-bearing deposits	371,834			—			—			—			371,834
Federal funds sold	1,823,000			—			—			—			1,823,000
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	2,993,427			—			—			—			2,993,427
TOTAL INVESTMENTS	$	5,700,740		$	840,178		$	3,693,915		$	3,209,756		$	13,444,589

75

Securities Ratings – Tables 30 and 31 present the carrying value of our investments by rating as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands). The ratings presented are the lowest ratings available for the security or the issuer based on NRSROs, where available. Some counterparties for collateralized overnight borrowing are not rated by an NRSRO because they are not issuers of debt or are otherwise not required to be rated by an NRSRO. We also utilize other credit quality factors when analyzing potential investments including, but not limited to, collateral performance, marketability, asset class or sector considerations, local and regional economic conditions, and/or the financial health of the underlying issuer.

Table 30

	06/30/2016
	Carrying Value1
	Investment Grade								Below Triple-B		Unrated		Total
	Triple-A		Double-A		Single-A		Triple-B
Interest-bearing deposits2	$	—	$	2,834	$	369,000	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	371,834
Federal funds sold2	—		—		1,823,000		—		—		—		1,823,000
Securities purchased under agreements to resell3	—		—		—		—		—		2,993,427		2,993,427
Investment securities:
Non-mortgage-backed securities:
GSE debentures	—		1,493,441		—		—		—		—		1,493,441
State or local housing agency obligations	68,385		30,000		11,205		—		—		—		109,590
Total non-mortgage-backed securities	68,385		1,523,441		11,205		—		—		—		1,603,031
Mortgage-backed or asset-backed securities:
U.S. obligation MBS	—		43,566		—		—		—		—		43,566
GSE MBS	—		6,471,663		—		—		—		—		6,471,663
Private label residential MBS	—		1,808		10,277		51,032		74,904		47		138,068
Total mortgage-backed securities	—		6,517,037		10,277		51,032		74,904		47		6,653,297
TOTAL INVESTMENTS	$	68,385	$	8,043,312	$	2,213,482	$	51,032	$	74,904	$	2,993,474	$	13,444,589

¹  Investment amounts represent the carrying value and do not include related accrued interest receivable of $21.0 million at June 30, 2016.

²  Amounts include unsecured credit exposure with overnight original maturities.

³  Amounts represent collateralized overnight borrowings by counterparty rating.

76

Table 31

	12/31/2015
	Carrying Value1
	Investment Grade								Below Triple-B		Unrated		Total
	Triple-A		Double-A		Single-A		Triple-B
Interest-bearing deposits2	$	—	$	594	$	100,000	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	100,594
Federal funds sold2	—		500,000		1,500,000		—		—		—		2,000,000
Securities purchased under agreements to resell3	—		1,000,000		—		—		—		2,945,000		3,945,000
Investment securities:
Non-mortgage-backed securities:
GSE debentures	—		1,338,639		—		—		—		—		1,338,639
State or local housing agency obligations	69,280		30,000		12,375		—		—		—		111,655
Total non-mortgage-backed securities	69,280		1,368,639		12,375		—		—		—		1,450,294
Mortgage-backed or asset-backed securities:
U.S. obligation MBS	—		48,035		—		—		—		—		48,035
GSE MBS	—		5,902,762		—		—		—		—		5,902,762
Private label residential MBS	—		2,531		11,907		52,661		92,244		52		159,395
Total mortgage-backed securities	—		5,953,328		11,907		52,661		92,244		52		6,110,192
TOTAL INVESTMENTS	$	69,280	$	8,822,561	$	1,624,282	$	52,661	$	92,244	$	2,945,052	$	13,606,080

¹  Investment amounts represent the carrying value and do not include related accrued interest receivable of $24.5 million at December 31, 2015.

²  Amounts include unsecured credit exposure with overnight original maturities.

³  Amounts represent collateralized overnight borrowings by counterparty rating.

Private-label Mortgage-backed and Asset-backed Securities – The carrying value of our portfolio of private-label MBS is less than one percent of total assets. We classify private-label MBS as prime, Alt-A and subprime based on the originator’s classification at the time of origination or based on classification by an NRSRO upon issuance of the MBS.

Table 32 presents a summary of the UPB of private-label MBS by interest rate type and by type of collateral (in thousands):

Table 32

	06/30/2016						12/31/2015
	Fixed Rate1		Variable Rate1		Total		Fixed Rate1		Variable Rate1		Total
Private-label residential MBS:
Prime	$	13,399	$	65,699	$	79,098	$	16,223	$	72,913	$	89,136
Alt-A	32,124		38,299		70,423		40,151		43,376		83,527
TOTAL	$	45,523	$	103,998	$	149,521	$	56,374	$	116,289	$	172,663

¹  The determination of fixed or variable rate is based upon the contractual coupon type of the security.

77

Almost all of our private-label MBS were securitized prior to 2006, and there are no securities in the portfolio issued after April 2006. As a result of this higher quality, well-seasoned portfolio, we have not experienced significant losses in our private-label MBS portfolio from OTTI. Table 33 presents statistical information for our private-label MBS by rating (dollar amounts in thousands):

Table 33

	06/30/2016
Private-label residential MBS:
UPB by credit rating:
Double-A	$	1,814
Single-A	10,276
Triple-B	51,229
Double-B	29,426
Single-B	16,229
Triple-C	14,018
Double-C	8,565
Single-D	17,918
Unrated	46
TOTAL	$	149,521
Amortized cost	$	144,976
Gross unrealized losses	(8,743		)
Fair value	137,654
OTTI:
Credit-related OTTI charge taken year-to-date	$	32
Non-credit-related OTTI charge taken year-to-date	33
TOTAL	$	65
Weighted average percentage of fair value to UPB	92.1		%
Original weighted average credit support1	5.0
Weighted average credit support1	12.0
Weighted average collateral delinquency2	9.7

¹  Credit support is defined as the percentage of subordinate tranches and over-collateralization, if any, in a security structure that will absorb losses before the holders of the security will incur losses.

²  Collateral delinquency is based on the sum of loans greater than 60 days delinquent plus loans in foreclosure plus loans in bankruptcy plus REO.

Deposits: Total deposits decreased$98.0 million from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016. Deposit products offered primarily include demand and overnight deposits and short-term certificates of deposit. Demand deposit programs are offered primarily to facilitate customer transactions with us, such as cash flows associated with advances and mortgage loan transactions. Overnight deposits provide an alternative short-term investment option to members. The majority of deposits are in overnight or demand accounts that generally re-price daily based upon a market index such as overnight Federal funds. However, because of the extremely low interest rate environment, we have established a current floor of 5 basis points on demand deposits and 10 basis points on overnight deposits. The level of deposits is driven by member demand for deposit products, which in turn is a function of the liquidity position of members. Factors that influence deposit levels include turnover in member investment and loan portfolios, changes in members’ customer deposit balances, changes in members’ demand for liquidity and our deposit pricing as compared to other short-term market rates. Declines in the level of deposits could occur if demand for loans at member institutions increases, if members choose to de-leverage their balance sheets, or if decreases in the general level of liquidity of members should occur. Fluctuations in deposits have little impact on our ability to obtain liquidity. We historically have had stable and ready access to the capital markets through consolidated obligations and can replace any reduction in deposits with similarly or even lower priced borrowings.

78

Consolidated Obligations: Consolidated obligations are the joint and several debt obligations of the FHLBanks and consist of bonds and discount notes. Consolidated obligations represent the primary source of liabilities we use to fund advances, mortgage loans and investments. As noted under Item 3 – “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” we use debt with a variety of maturities and option characteristics to manage our interest rate risk profile. We make use of derivative transactions, executed in conjunction with specific consolidated obligation debt issues, to synthetically structure funding terms and costs.

Bonds are primarily used to fund longer-term (one year or greater) advances, mortgage loans and investments. To the extent that the bonds are funding variable rate assets, we typically either issue bonds that have variable rates matching the variable rate asset index or utilize an interest rate swap to change the bonds' characteristics in order to match the assets' index. Additionally, we sometimes use fixed rate, variable rate or complex consolidated obligation bonds that are swapped or indexed to LIBOR to fund short-term advances and money market investments or as a liquidity risk management tool.

Discount notes are primarily used to fund: (1) shorter-term advances or adjustable rate advances with indices and resets based on our short-term cost of funds; and (2) investments with maturities of three months or less. However, we sometimes use discount notes to fund longer-term assets, including fixed rate assets, variable rate assets, assets swapped to synthetically create variable rate assets, and short-term anticipated cash flows generated by longer-term fixed rate assets.

Total consolidated obligations increased 4.7 percent from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016. Discount notes increased from 52.3 percent of total outstanding consolidated obligations as of December 31, 2015 to 61.6 percent as of June 30, 2016 primarily as a result of the increase in our line of credit product and other short-term advance products, which are generally funded with discount notes, and market conditions that have caused an increase in the cost of consolidated obligation bonds indexed or swapped to LIBOR, resulting in our use of discount notes instead of these bonds to fund LIBOR-based assets. We expect to continue funding our short-term advances with discount notes; however, we do not expect to increase the utilization of discount notes to fund our LIBOR-based assets. We were able to replace some maturing and unswapped callable bonds with lower cost consolidated obligation bonds during the second quarter of 2016. Replacing callable debt generally increases interest costs in the short term due to the acceleration of the unamortized concessions on the debt when it is called because concession costs are amortized to contractual maturity. However, this increase is offset by the lower rate on the new debt and the funding benefit due to the timing differences between the date the debt is called and the forward settlement date of the new debt (conventionally not exceeding 30 days).

While we currently have stable access to funding markets, future developments could impact the cost of replacing outstanding debt. Some of these include, but are not limited to, a large increase in call volume, significant increases in advance demand, legislative and regulatory changes, geopolitical events, proposals addressing GSEs, derivative and financial market reform, a decline in investor demand for consolidated obligations, further rating agency downgrades of U.S. Treasury obligations that will in turn impact the rating on FHLBank consolidated obligations, and changes in Federal Reserve policies and outlooks.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity: We maintain high levels of liquidity to achieve our mission of serving as an economical funding source for our members and housing associates. As part of fulfilling our mission, we also maintain minimum liquidity requirements in accordance with certain Finance Agency regulations and guidelines and in accordance with policies established by management and the Board of Directors. Our business model enables us to manage the levels of our assets, liabilities, and capital in response to member credit demand, membership composition, and market conditions. As such, assets and liabilities utilized for liquidity purposes can vary significantly in the normal course of business due to the amount and timing of cash flows as a result of these factors.

Sources and Uses of Liquidity – A primary source of our liquidity is the issuance of consolidated obligations. The capital markets traditionally have treated FHLBank obligations as U.S. government agency debt. As a result, even though the U.S. government does not guarantee FHLBank debt, we generally have comparatively stable access to funding at relatively favorable spreads to U.S. Treasury rates. We are primarily and directly liable for our portion of consolidated obligations (i.e., those obligations issued on our behalf). In addition, we are jointly and severally liable with the other FHLBanks for the payment of principal and interest on the consolidated obligations of all FHLBanks.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, proceeds (net of premiums and discounts) from the issuance of bonds and discount notes were $8.1 billion and $265.9 billion, respectively, compared to $7.1 billion and $143.0 billion for the same period in 2015. The large increase between periods reflects the cumulative effect of using a higher allocation of shorter term discount notes, primarily overnight discount notes, during the first half of 2016. We generally use short-term discount notes to fund short-term advances and our short-term liquidity portfolio, but we have been funding a larger percentage of our assets with discount notes due to market conditions which have increased the cost of consolidated obligation bonds indexed or swapped to LIBOR. Our other sources of liquidity include deposit inflows, repayments of advances and mortgage loans, maturing investments, interest income, Federal Funds purchased, and proceeds from reverse repurchase agreements or the sale of unencumbered assets.

79

At June 30, 2016, our short-term liquidity portfolio, which consists of cash and investments with remaining maturities of one year or less and includes term and overnight Federal funds sold, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, and reverse repurchase agreements, decreased $1.5 billion, from $7.4 billion as of December 31, 2015 to $5.9 billion as of June 30, 2016. The decrease was due to a greater influx of cash at the end of the year compared to other quarter ends. The maturities of our short-term investments are structured to provide periodic cash flows to support our ongoing liquidity needs. To enhance our liquidity position, short-term investment securities (i.e., commercial paper and marketable certificates of deposit) are also classified as trading so that they can be readily sold should liquidity be needed immediately. We also maintain a portfolio of GSE debentures and GSE MBS that can be pledged as collateral for financing in the securities repurchase agreement market and are classified as trading to enhance our liquidity position. These debentures were $1.4 billion and $1.3 billion in par value as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. We held GSE MBS with a par value of $951.3 million and $962.2 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. In addition to the balance sheet sources of liquidity discussed previously, we have established lines of credit with numerous counterparties in the Federal funds market as well as with the other FHLBanks. Accordingly, we expect to maintain a sufficient level of liquidity for the foreseeable future.

We manage our average capital ratio to remain above our minimum regulatory and RMP requirements so that we have the ability to issue additional consolidated obligations should the need arise. Excess capital capacity ensures we are able to meet the liquidity needs of our members and/or repurchase excess stock either upon the submission of a redemption request by a member or at our discretion for balance sheet or capital management purposes.

Uses of liquidity primarily include issuing advances, purchasing investments, and repaying called and maturing consolidated obligations for which we are the primary obligor. We also use liquidity to purchase mortgage loans, repay member deposits, pledge collateral to derivative counterparties, redeem or repurchase capital stock, and pay dividends to members.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, advance disbursements totaled $64.6 billion compared to $48.3 billion for the same period in 2015. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, investment purchases (excluding overnight investments) totaled $1.2 billion compared to $4.0 billion for the same period in 2015. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, payments on consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes were $11.2 billion and $260.9 billion, respectively, compared to $6.1 billion and $135.7 billion for the same period in 2015, which includes bonds that were called during the period. The large increase in payments on discount notes between periods primarily reflects the cumulative effect of using a higher allocation of discount notes, including overnight discount notes.

Liquidity Requirements – We are subject to five metrics for measuring liquidity: statutory, operational, and contingency liquidity, and calendar day guidelines under different scenarios. Statutory liquidity requires us to have an amount equal to current deposits received from members invested in obligations of the United States, deposits in eligible banks or trust companies, and advances with a final maturity not exceeding five years. Operational liquidity requires that we maintain liquidity in an amount not less than 20 percent of the sum of our demand and overnight deposits and other overnight borrowings, plus 10 percent of the sum of our term deposits, consolidated obligations, and other borrowings that mature within one year. Contingency liquidity is an amount sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for five business days if we are unable to access the capital markets to issue consolidated obligations. Our net liquidity in excess of contingency liquidity over a cumulative five-business-day period was $3.5 billion as of June 30, 2016. Contingency plans are in place at the FHLBank and the Office of Finance that prioritize the allocation of liquidity resources in the event of financial market disruptions, as well as systemic Federal Reserve wire transfer system disruptions. Further, under the Bank Act, the Secretary of Treasury has the authority, at his discretion, to purchase consolidated obligations up to an aggregate amount of $4.0 billion. No borrowings under this authority have been outstanding since 1977.

In addition to the liquidity measures described above, we are required by the Finance Agency to meet two daily liquidity standards, each of which assumes that we are unable to access the market for consolidated obligations. The first standard requires us to maintain sufficient funds to meet our obligations for 15 days under a scenario in which it is assumed that members do not renew any maturing advances. The second standard requires us to maintain sufficient funds to meet our obligations for five days under a scenario in which it is assumed that members renew all maturing advances. We remained in compliance with each of these liquidity requirements throughout the first half of 2016. See “Risk Management - Liquidity Risk Management” under this Item 2 for additional discussion on our liquidity requirements.

80

In order to ensure sufficient liquidity, we generally maintain a relatively longer weighted-average maturity on our consolidated obligation discount notes than the weighted average maturity of short-term liquid investment balances. The weighted average remaining days to maturity of discount notes outstanding remained steady at 37 days as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The weighted average remaining maturity of our money market investment portfolio (Federal funds sold, marketable certificates of deposit, commercial paper and reverse repurchase agreements) and non-earning cash left in our Federal Reserve Bank account was 1 day and 4 days as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, because we held only short-term investments with overnight maturities as of those dates. The mismatch of discount notes and our money market investment portfolio increased from 33 days on December 31, 2015 to 36 days on June 30, 2016 as a result of the increase in the weighted average remaining days to maturity of our discount notes. Over time, especially as the yield curve steepens on the short end, maintaining the differential between the weighted average original maturity of discount notes and money market investments will increase our cost of funds and reduce our net interest income.

Capital: Total capital consists of capital stock, retained earnings, and AOCI.

Capital stock increased 11.4 percent from December 31, 2015 to June 30, 2016, primarily due to increased utilization of advances. Under our capital plan, members must purchase additional activity-based stock as they enter into advance transactions with us. The amount required is subject to change within ranges established under our capital plan.

Excess stock represents the amount of stock held by a member in excess of that institution’s minimum stock requirement. Upon reducing the activity-based stock purchase requirement, through a mandated change or through a reduction of advance balances, excess stock is created since the member no longer needs the same level of activity-based capital stock. If our excess stock exceeds 1.0 percent of our assets before or after the payment of a dividend in the form of stock, we would be prohibited by Finance Agency regulation from paying dividends in the form of stock. To manage the amount of excess stock, we repurchase excess Class A Common Stock over FHLBank-established limits held by any individual member periodically throughout the year. In April 2014, we began the practice of repurchasing all outstanding excess Class A Common Stock, generally on a monthly basis. Our current practice of regular weekly exchanges of all excess Class B Common Stock over $50,000 per member for Class A Common Stock remains in effect.

Under our cooperatively structured capital plan, our capital stock balances should fluctuate along with any growth (increased capital stock balances) or reduction (decreased capital stock balances) in advance balances in future periods. Any repurchase of excess capital stock is at our discretion and subject to statutory and regulatory limitations, including being in compliance with all of our regulatory capital requirements after any such discretionary repurchase.

81

Our activity-based stock purchase requirements are consistent with our cooperative structure; members’ stock ownership requirements and the dollar amount of dividends received generally increases as their activities with us increase. To the extent that a member’s asset-based stock purchase requirement is insufficient to cover the member’s activity-based stock purchase requirement and the member is required to purchase Class B Common Stock, we believe the value of our products and services is enhanced by dividend yields that exceed the return available from other investments with similar terms and credit quality. Factors that affect members’ willingness to enter into activity with us and purchase additional required activity-based stock include, but are not limited to, our dividend rates, the risk-based capital weighting of our capital stock and alternative investment opportunities available to our members. Based on anecdotal evidence (such as member advance activity and discussions with members), we believe that our activity-based stock purchase requirement for advances has not reduced advance activity with our members, although that may not hold true in the future. Table 34 provides a summary of member capital requirements under our current capital plan as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

Table 34

Requirement	06/30/2016		12/31/2015
Asset-based (Class A only)	$	158,256	$	154,290
Activity-based (additional Class B)1	1,069,250		960,538
Total Required Stock2	1,227,506		1,114,828
Excess Stock (Class A and B)	124,130		96,858
Total Stock2	$	1,351,636	$	1,211,686
Activity-based Requirements:
Advances3	$	1,166,049	$	1,052,889
AMA assets (mortgage loans)4	1,348		1,521
Total Activity-based Requirement	1,167,397		1,054,410
Asset-based Requirement (Class A Common Stock) not supporting member activity1	60,109		60,418
Total Required Stock2	$	1,227,506	$	1,114,828

¹  Class A Common Stock, up to a member’s asset-based stock requirement, will be used to satisfy a member’s activity-based stock requirement before any Class B Common Stock is purchased by the member.

²  Includes mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

³  Advances to housing associates have no activity-based requirements because housing associates cannot own FHLBank stock.

⁴  Non-members are subject to the AMA activity-based stock requirement as long as there are UPBs outstanding, but the requirement is currently zero percent for members.

We are subject to three capital requirements under provisions of the GLB Act, the Finance Agency’s capital structure regulation and our current capital plan, which includes risk-based capital requirement, total capital requirement and leverage capital requirement. We have been in compliance with each of the aforementioned capital rules and requirements at all times since the implementation of our capital plan. See Note 11 of the Notes to Financial Statements under Item 1 for additional information and compliance as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Capital Distributions: Dividends may be paid in cash or capital stock as authorized by our Board of Directors. Quarterly dividends can be paid out of current and previous unrestricted retained earnings, subject to Finance Agency regulation and our capital plan.

Within our capital plan, we have the ability to pay different dividend rates to the holders of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. This differential is implemented through a mechanism referred to as the dividend parity threshold. Holders of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock share in dividends equally up to the dividend parity threshold for a dividend period, then the dividend rate for holders of Class B Common Stock can exceed the rate for holders of Class A Common Stock, but the dividend rate on Class A Common Stock can never exceed the dividend rate on Class B Common Stock. In essence, the dividend parity threshold: (1) serves as a soft floor to holders of Class A Common Stock since we must pay holders of Class A Common Stock the dividend parity threshold rate before paying a higher rate to holders of Class B Common Stock; (2) indicates a potential dividend rate to holders of Class A Common Stock so that they can make decisions as to whether or not to hold excess Class A Common Stock; and (3) provides us with a tool to manage the amount of excess stock through higher or lower dividend rates by varying the desirability of holding excess shares of Class A Common Stock (i.e., the lower the dividend rate on Class A Common Stock, the less desirable it is to hold excess Class A Common Stock).

82

The current dividend parity threshold is equal to the average effective overnight Federal funds rate for a dividend period minus 100 basis points. This dividend parity threshold was effective for dividends paid for all of 2015 and 2016 and will continue to be effective until such time as it may be changed by our Board of Directors. With the current level of the overnight Federal funds target rate, the dividend parity threshold is effectively floored at zero percent at this time. Under the capital plan, all dividends paid in the form of capital stock must be paid in the form of Class B Common Stock. Table 35 presents the dividend rates per annum paid on capital stock under our capital plan for the periods indicated:

Table 35

Applicable Rate per Annum	06/30/2016		03/31/2016		12/31/2015		09/30/2015		06/30/2015
Class A Common Stock	1.00	%	1.00	%	1.00	%	1.00	%	1.00	%
Class B Common Stock	6.00		6.00		6.00		6.00		6.00
Weighted Average1	5.30		5.32		5.31		5.29		5.22
Dividend Parity Threshold:
Average effective overnight Federal funds rate	0.37	%	0.37	%	0.16	%	0.14	%	0.13	%
Spread to index	(1.00	)	(1.00	)	(1.00	)	(1.00	)	(1.00	)
TOTAL (floored at zero percent)	0.00	%	0.00	%	0.00	%	0.00	%	0.00	%

¹  Weighted average dividend rates are dividends paid in cash and stock on both classes of stock divided by the average of capital stock eligible for dividends.

We increased the dividend rate to 6.00 percent on Class B Common Stock in the third quarter of 2014, as a result of a change in our capital management practices intended to result in a higher percentage payout of quarterly earnings, slower growth in retained earnings, and increased advance utilization due in no small part to the extremely low all-in cost of advances once the dividend is factored in. We expect to recommend maintaining the current dividend rates on Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock for a considerable time in keeping with the desire to pay out a larger percentage of income than in the past. We caution, however, that market conditions can be unpredictable and adverse changes may result in lower dividend rates in future quarters. While there is no assurance that our Board of Directors will not change the dividend parity threshold in the future, the capital plan requires that we provide members with 90 days' notice prior to the end of a dividend period in which a different dividend parity threshold is utilized in the payment of a dividend.

We expect to continue paying dividends primarily in the form of capital stock in 2016, but future dividends may be paid in cash. The payment of cash dividends instead of stock dividends should not have a significant impact from a liquidity perspective, as the subsequent redemption of excess stock created by stock dividends would utilize liquidity resources in the same manner as a cash dividend.

Risk Management

Active risk management continues to be an essential part of our operations and a key determinant of our ability to maintain earnings to return an acceptable dividend to our members and meet retained earnings thresholds. We maintain an enterprise risk management (ERM) program in an effort to enable the identification of all significant risks to the organization and institute the prompt and effective management of any major risk exposures. Our ERM program is a structured and disciplined approach that aligns strategy, processes, people, technology and knowledge with the purpose of identifying, evaluating and managing the uncertainties we face as we create value. It is a continuous process of identifying, prioritizing, assessing and managing inherent enterprise risks (i.e., business, compliance, credit, liquidity, market and operations) before they become realized risk events. See Item 7 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management” in our Form 10-K for more information on our ERM program. A separate discussion of market risk is included under Item 3 – “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” of this Form 10-Q.

Credit Risk Management: Credit risk is defined as the potential that a borrower or counterparty will fail to meet its financial obligations in accordance with agreed terms. We manage credit risk by following established policies, evaluating the creditworthiness of our counterparties, and utilizing collateral agreements and settlement netting for derivative transactions where enforceability of the legal right of offset has been determined. The most important step in the management of credit risk is the initial decision to extend credit. Continuous monitoring of counterparties is completed for all areas where we are exposed to credit risk, whether that is through lending, investing or derivative activities.

Lending and AMA Activities – Credit risk with members arises partly as a result of our lending and AMA activities (members’ CE obligations on conventional mortgage loans that we acquire through the MPF Program). We manage our exposure to credit risk on advances, letters of credit, derivatives, and members’ CE obligations on conventional mortgage loans through a combined approach that provides ongoing review of the financial condition of our members coupled with prudent collateralization.

83

As provided in the Bank Act, a member’s investment in our capital stock is held as additional collateral for the member’s advances and other credit obligations (letters of credit, CE obligations, etc.). In addition, we can call for additional collateral or substitute collateral during the life of an advance or other credit obligation to protect our security interest.

Credit risk arising from AMA activities under our MPF Program falls into three categories: (1) the risk of credit losses on the mortgage loans represented in our First Loss Account (FLA) and last loss positions; (2) the risk that a PFI will not perform as promised with respect to its loss position provided through its CE obligations on conventional mortgage loan pools, which are covered by the same collateral arrangements as those described for advances; and (3) the risk that a third-party insurer (obligated under primary mortgage insurance (PMI) or supplemental mortgage insurance (SMI) arrangements) will fail to perform as expected. Should a PMI third-party insurer fail to perform, it would increase our credit risk exposure because our FLA is the next layer to absorb credit losses on conventional mortgage loan pools. Likewise, if an SMI third-party insurer fails to perform, it would increase our credit risk exposure because it would reduce the participating member’s CE obligation loss layer since SMI is purchased by PFIs to cover all or a portion of their CE obligation exposure for mortgage pools. Credit risk exposure to third-party insurers to which we have PMI and/or SMI exposure is monitored on a monthly basis and regularly reported to the Board of Directors. We perform credit analysis of third-party PMI and SMI insurers on at least an annual basis. On a monthly basis, we review trends that could identify risks with our mortgage loan portfolio, including low FICO scores and high LTV ratios. Based on the credit underwriting standards under the MPF Program and this monthly review, we have concluded that the mortgage loans we hold would not be considered subprime.

Investments – Our RMP restricts the acquisition of investments to high-quality, short-term money market instruments and highly rated long-term securities. The short-term investment portfolio represents unsecured credit and reverse repurchase agreements. Therefore, counterparty ratings are monitored daily while performance and capital adequacy are monitored on a monthly basis in an effort to mitigate unsecured credit risk on our short-term investments. Collateral valuation and compliance with collateral eligibility and transaction margin requirements are monitored daily to limit secured credit risk on our reverse repurchase agreements. MBS represent the majority of our long-term investments. We hold MBS issued by Ginnie Mae and GSEs, collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) securitized by GSEs, private-label MBS rated triple-A at the time of purchase, and CMOs securitized by whole loans. Approximately 97 percent of our MBS/CMO portfolio is securitized by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. All of our private-label MBS have been downgraded below triple-A subsequent to purchase (see Table 33), but the downgraded securities have been and are currently paying according to contractual agreements with the exception of six securities that have experienced immaterial cash flow shortfalls. Other long-term investments include unsecured GSE debentures and unsecured or collateralized state and local housing finance agency securities that were rated at least double-A at the time of purchase.

Derivatives – We transact most of our derivatives with large banks and major broker-dealers. Over-the-counter derivative transactions may be either executed with a counterparty (uncleared derivatives) or with an executing broker and cleared through a Futures Commission Merchant (i.e., clearing agent), with a Derivative Clearing Organization (cleared derivatives).

We are subject to credit risk due to the risk of nonperformance by counterparties to our derivative transactions. The amount of credit risk on derivatives depends on the extent to which netting procedures and collateral requirements are used and are effective in mitigating the risk. We manage this risk through credit analysis and collateral management. We are also required to follow the requirements set forth by applicable regulation.

Uncleared Derivatives. We are subject to non-performance by the counterparties to our uncleared derivative transactions. We generally require collateral on uncleared derivative transactions. For some counterparties, the amount of net unsecured credit exposure that is permissible with respect to the counterparty depends on the credit rating of that counterparty. For other counterparties, collateral is required on all net unsecured credit exposure. For a counterparty with credit rating thresholds, a counterparty generally must deliver collateral to us if the total market value of our exposure to that counterparty rises above a specific trigger point. Our credit risk exposure from derivative transactions with member institutions is fully collateralized under our Advance, Pledge and Security Agreement. As a result of these risk mitigation initiatives, we do not anticipate any credit losses on our uncleared derivative transactions as of June 30, 2016.

Cleared Derivatives. We are subject to nonperformance by the Clearinghouse(s) and clearing agent(s). The requirement that we post initial and variation margin, through the clearing agent, to the Clearinghouse, exposes us to institutional credit risk in the event that the clearing agent or the Clearinghouse fails to meet its obligations. The use of cleared derivatives is intended to mitigate credit risk exposure because a central counterparty is substituted for individual counterparties and collateral is posted daily for changes in the value of cleared derivatives through a clearing agent. We do not anticipate any credit losses on our cleared derivatives as of June 30, 2016.

84

We regularly monitor the exposures on our derivative transactions by determining the market value of positions using internal pricing models. The market values generated by the pricing model used to value derivatives are compared to dealer model results on a monthly basis to ensure that our derivative pricing model is reasonably calibrated to actual market pricing methodologies utilized by the dealers. In addition, we have our internal pricing model validated annually by an independent consultant. As a result of these risk mitigation initiatives, management does not anticipate any credit losses on our derivative transactions. See Note 7 of the Notes to Financial Statements under Item 1 for additional information on managing credit risk on derivatives.

The contractual or notional amount of derivative transactions reflects our involvement in the various classes of financial instruments. The maximum credit risk with respect to derivative transactions is the estimated cost of replacing the derivative transactions if there are defaults, minus the value of any related collateral posted to satisfy the initial margin (if required) and the variation margin. Our derivative transactions are subject to variation margin which is derived from the change in market value of the transaction and must be posted by the net debtor on demand. Cleared transactions are subject to initial margin as well as variation margin. The initial margin is intended to protect the Clearinghouse against default of a clearing agent and to protect the clearing agent against default of a customer. Initial margin is calculated to cover the potential price volatility of the derivative transaction between the time of the default and the assignment of the transaction to another clearing agent or termination of the transaction. Although the initial margin requirement should decrease over time as the duration and market volatility decrease, it remains outstanding for the life of the transaction; thus, it is possible that we could either have: (1) net credit exposure with a Clearinghouse even if our net creditor position has been fully satisfied by the receipt of variation margin; or (2) net credit exposure with a Clearinghouse despite being the net debtor (i.e., being in a liability position). In determining maximum credit risk, we consider accrued interest receivables and payables as well as the netting requirements to net assets and liabilities.

Tables 36 and 37 present derivative notional amounts and counterparty credit exposure, net of collateral, by whole-letter rating (in the event of a split rating, we use the lowest rating published by Moody's Investor Service or Standard and Poor's) for derivative positions with counterparties to which we had credit exposure (in thousands):

Table 36

06/30/2016
Credit Rating	Notional Amount		Net Derivatives Fair Value Before Collateral			Cash Collateral Pledged From (To) Counterparty			Net Credit Exposure to Counterparties
Asset positions with credit exposure:
Uncleared derivatives:
Single-A	$	401,000	$	1,233		$	100		$	1,133
Liability positions with credit exposure:
Uncleared derivatives1:
Single-A	3,470,400		(87,593		)	(92,959		)	5,366
Cleared derivatives2	4,332,654		(141,104		)	(195,525		)	54,421
TOTAL DERIVATIVE POSITIONS WITH CREDIT EXPOSURE	$	8,204,054	$	(227,464	)	$	(288,384	)	$	60,920

¹  Exposure can change on a daily basis; and thus, there is often a short lag time between the date the exposure is identified, collateral is requested and collateral is actually returned.

²  Represents derivative transactions cleared with Clearinghouses, which are not rated.

85

Table 37

12/31/2015
Credit Rating	Notional Amount		Net Derivatives Fair Value Before Collateral			Cash Collateral Pledged From (To) Counterparty			Net Credit Exposure to Counterparties
Asset positions with credit exposure:
Uncleared derivatives:
Double-A	$	250,000	$	53		$	—		$	53
Single-A	1,832,154		26,512			22,004			4,508
Liability positions with credit exposure:
Uncleared derivatives1:
Single-A	2,803,762		(53,857		)	(58,156		)	4,299
Cleared derivatives2	5,977,132		(51,148		)	(93,808		)	42,660
TOTAL DERIVATIVE POSITIONS WITH CREDIT EXPOSURE	$	10,863,048	$	(78,440	)	$	(129,960	)	$	51,520

¹  Exposure can change on a daily basis; and thus, there is often a short lag time between the date the exposure is identified, collateral is requested and collateral is actually returned.

²  Represents derivative transactions cleared with Clearinghouses, which are not rated.

Foreign Counterparty Risk– Loans, acceptances, interest-bearing deposits with other banks, other interest-bearing investments and any other monetary assets payable to us by entities of foreign countries, regardless of the currency in which the claim is denominated are referred to as "cross-border outstandings." Our cross-border outstandings consist primarily of short-term trading securities and Federal funds sold issued by banks and other financial institutions, which are non-sovereign entities, and derivative asset exposure with counterparties that are also non-sovereign entities. Secured reverse repurchase agreements outstanding are excluded from cross-border outstandings because they are fully collateralized.

In addition to credit risk, cross-border outstandings have the risk that, as a result of political or economic conditions in a country, borrowers may be unable to meet their contractual repayment obligations of principal and/or interest when due because of the unavailability of, or restrictions on, foreign exchange needed by borrowers to repay their obligations. Unsecured credit exposure continues to be cautiously placed, with non-derivatives exposure concentrated in the United States, Canada, Germany, Netherlands and the Nordic countries.

Table 38 presents the total fair value of cross-border outstandings to countries in which we do business as of June 30, 2016 (dollar amounts in thousands).

Table 38

	Canada					Other1					Total1
	Amount			Percent of Total Assets		Amount			Percent of Total Assets		Amount			Percent of Total Assets
Federal funds sold2	$	493,000		1.1	%	$	1,080,000		2.3	%	$	1,573,000		3.4	%
Derivative assets:
Net exposure at fair value	(10,512		)			(29,439		)			(39,951		)
Cash collateral held	10,763					33,983					44,746
Net exposure after cash collateral	251			—		4,544			—		4,795			—
TOTAL	$	493,251		1.1	%	$	1,084,544		2.3	%	$	1,577,795		3.4	%

¹  Represents foreign countries where individual exposure is less than one percent of total assets. Total cross-border outstandings to countries that individually represented between 0.75 and 1.0 percent of our total assets as of June 30, 2016 were $1.1 billion (Norway, Netherlands, and Germany).

²  Consists solely of overnight Federal funds sold.

86

Liquidity Risk Management: Maintaining the ability to meet our obligations as they come due and to meet the credit needs of our members and housing associates in a timely and cost-efficient manner is the primary objective of managing liquidity risk. We seek to be in a position to meet the credit needs of our members, as well as our debt service and liquidity needs, without maintaining excessive holdings of low-yielding liquid investments or being forced to incur unnecessarily high borrowing costs.

Operational liquidity, or the ability to meet operational requirements in the normal course of business, is currently defined in our RMP as sources of cash from both our ongoing access to the capital markets and our holding of liquid assets. We manage exposure to operational liquidity risk by maintaining appropriate daily liquidity levels above the thresholds established by our RMP. We are also required to manage liquidity in order to meet statutory and contingency liquidity requirements and Finance Agency liquidity guidelines by maintaining a daily liquidity level above certain thresholds also outlined in the RMP, federal statutes, Finance Agency regulations and other Finance Agency guidance not issued in the form of regulations. We remained in compliance with each of these liquidity requirements throughout the second quarter of 2016.

We are focused on maintaining a liquidity and funding balance between our financial assets and financial liabilities. Within the FHLBank System guidelines, each FHLBank develops its own metrics and milestones for enhancing its liquidity risk management practices. However, the FHLBanks work collectively to manage the system-wide liquidity and funding management and jointly monitor the combined refinancing risk. In managing and monitoring the amounts of assets that require refunding, we may consider contractual maturities of the financial assets, as well as certain assumptions regarding expected cash flows (i.e., estimated prepayments and scheduled amortizations).  See the Notes to the Financial Statements under Item 1 for more detailed information regarding contractual maturities of certain of our financial assets and liabilities.

We generally maintained stable access to the capital markets for the quarter ended June 30, 2016. For additional discussion of the market for our consolidated obligations and the overall market affecting liquidity see “Financial Market Trends” under this Item 2.

Certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to post additional collateral with our counterparties if there is deterioration in our credit rating. See Note 7 of the Notes to Financial Statements under Item 1 for additional information on collateral posting requirements and credit-risk-related contingent features. We believe that our liquidity position as of June 30, 2016 was sufficient to satisfy the additional collateral that would be required in the event of a downgrade in our credit rating from double-A to single-A if the downgrade was effective at that time, and such amounts would not have a material impact to our financial condition or results of operations.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

See Note 2 of the Notes to Financial Statements under Item 1 – "Financial Statements" for a discussion of recently issued accounting standards.

Legislative and Regulatory Developments

Finance Agency Final Rule on FHLBank Membership.On January 20, 2016, the Finance Agency issued a rule effective on February 19, 2016 that, among other things:

• makes captive insurance companies ineligible for FHLBank membership; and

• defines the “principal place of business” of an institution eligible for FHLBank membership to be the state in which it maintains its home office and from which the institution conducts business operations.

The rule defines a captive insurance company as a company that is authorized under state law to conduct an insurance business but whose primary business is the underwriting of insurance for affiliated persons or entities.

Captive insurance company members that were admitted as FHLBank members prior to September 12, 2014 (the date the Finance Agency proposed this rule) will have their memberships terminated by February 18, 2021. Captive insurance company members that were admitted as FHLBank members after September 12, 2014 will have their memberships terminated by February 18, 2017. There are restrictions on the level and maturity of advances that FHLBanks can make to these members during the sunset periods.

Implementation of this rule did not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations nor is it expected to have a material impact in future periods.

87

Joint Proposed Rule on Incentive-Based Compensation Arrangements. On April 26, 2016, the Finance Agency, jointly with five other federal regulators, issued the rule contemplated by Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), which requires implementation of regulations or guidelines to: (1) prohibit incentive-based payment arrangements that these regulators determine encourage inappropriate risks by certain financial institutions by providing excessive compensation or that could lead to material financial loss; and (2) require those financial institutions to disclose information concerning incentive-based compensation arrangements to the appropriate federal regulator.

The proposed rule identifies three categories of institutions that would be covered by these regulations based on average total consolidated assets, applying less prescriptive incentive-based compensation program requirements to the smallest covered institutions (Level 3) and progressively more rigorous requirements to the larger covered institutions (Level 1). The proposed rule specifies that the FHLBanks would fall into the middle category, Level 2. The proposed rule would supplement existing executive compensation rules.

The proposed rule would prohibit us from establishing or maintaining incentive-based compensation arrangements that encourage inappropriate risks by “senior executive officers” and “significant risk-takers” (each as defined in the proposed rule, together, “covered persons”) that could lead to a material financial loss.

If adopted in its current form, the proposed rule would, among other things, impose requirements related to our incentive-based compensation arrangements for covered persons, related to:

• mandatory deferrals of 50 percent and 40 percent of annual and "long-term" incentive-based compensation payments for senior executive officers and significant risk takers, respectively, over no less than 3 years for annual incentive-based compensation and 1 year for compensation awarded under a long-term incentive plan;

• risk of downward adjustment and forfeiture of awards;

• clawbacks of vested compensation; and

• limits on the maximum incentive-based compensation opportunity.

Comments were due on the proposed rule by July 22, 2016. The proposed rule would impact the design and operation of the FHLBank's compensation policies and practices, including incentive compensation policies and practices, if adopted as proposed.

Joint Proposed Rule Regarding Net Stable Funding Ratio. On May 3, 2016, the Federal Reserve Board, the Department of Treasury and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, jointly issued a proposed rule that would implement a stable funding requirement, the net stable funding ratio (NSFR), for large and internationally active banking organizations. The NSFR will require institutions to maintain liquidity to match their assets over a one-year time horizon. The Federal Reserve Board is proposing a modified NSFR requirement for bank holding companies and certain savings and loan holding companies that, in each case, have $50 billion or more, but less than $250 billion, in total consolidated assets and less than $10 billion in total on-balance sheet foreign exposure. If adopted in its current form, the proposed rule would provide that secured funding with maturities between six months and one year, including FHLBank advances, would be assigned 50 percent liquidity credit for purposes of calculating compliance with the NSFR, which could affect demand for the FHLBank’s advances.

Comments are due on the proposed rule by August 5, 2016.

Item 3:Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk Management

We measure interest rate risk exposure by various methods, including the calculation of duration of equity (DOE) and market value of equity (MVE) in different interest rate scenarios.

Duration of Equity: DOE aggregates the estimated sensitivity of market value for each of our financial assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates. In essence, DOE indicates the sensitivity of MVE to changes in interest rates. However, MVE should not be considered indicative of our market value as a going concern or our value in a liquidation scenario.

88

We manage DOE within ranges approved by our Board of Directors as described under Item 7A - "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" in the annual report on Form 10-K, incorporated by reference herein. All of our DOE measurements were inside Board of Director established policy limits and operating ranges as of June 30, 2016. On an ongoing basis, we actively monitor portfolio relationships and overall DOE dynamics as a part of our evaluation processes for determining acceptable future asset/liability management actions. Table 39 presents the DOE in the base case and the up and down 200 basis point interest rate shock scenarios as of the periods noted:

Table 39

Duration of Equity
Date	Up 200 Basis Points	Base	Down 200 Basis Points
06/30/2016	2.1	-1.4	1.0
03/31/2016	1.8	0.9	1.1
12/31/2015	2.0	1.0	2.0
09/30/2015	1.9	1.2	0.9
06/30/2015	1.7	0.6	0.2

The DOE as of June 30, 2016 increased in the up 200 basis point shock scenario and decreased in the base and the down 200 basis point shock scenarios from March 31, 2016. The primary factors contributing to these changes in duration during the period were: (1) the significant decline in intermediate- and long-term interest rates and the relative level of mortgage rates during the period; (2) the slight increase in the fixed rate mortgage loan portfolio during the period along with a slight decline in the weighting of the portfolio as a percent of total assets as advance balances continued to increase; and (3) asset/liability actions taken by management throughout the period, including the continued call and re-issuance of long-term, unswapped callable consolidated obligation bonds with short lock-out periods and the continued issuance of discount notes to fund the growth in advances.

The decline in intermediate- and long-term interest rates during the second quarter of 2016 generally resulted in a shortening duration profile for both the fixed rate mortgage loan portfolio and the associated unswapped callable consolidated obligation bonds funding these assets. With the slight increase in our mortgage loan portfolio during the period, as discussed in Item 2 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition – MPF Program,” the portfolio level duration profile changed as expected since a general decline in interest rates typically generates faster prepayments for both new production mortgage loans, as well as the outstanding fixed rate mortgage loan portfolio. Generally, lower interest rates indicate a relative increase in refinancing incentive for borrowers.

Even though the fixed rate mortgage loan portfolio increased slightly in net outstanding balance during the period, the portfolio actually decreased as an overall percentage of assets as the balance sheet expanded, decreasing from 14.2 percent of total assets as of March 31, 2016 to 13.9 percent as of June 30, 2016. Even with this weighting decrease, the mortgage loan portfolio continues to represent a sizable portion of the balance sheet, and changes occurring with this portfolio tend to be magnified in terms of DOE. Since the mortgage loan portfolio continues to comprise a considerable percentage of overall assets and has such a high duration relative to our other assets, its behavior is quite visible in the duration risk profile and changes in this portfolio are typically magnified as the composition of assets change. This magnification occurs when a portfolio market value weighting as a percent of the overall net market value of the balance sheet changes, causing the remaining portfolios to be a smaller or larger component of the total balance sheet composition. For example, during the second quarter of 2016, advance balances increased causing the mortgage loan portfolio weighting to decrease as a total proportion of total assets. However, with the significant decline in intermediate- and long-term interest rates, the market value gains in the mortgage loan portfolio actually caused the mortgage loan portfolio to generally maintain its large percentage of overall market value of assets. This increase in market value of assets caused the duration shortening for this portfolio to have a greater impact on DOE. In other words, this relationship causes the duration of the mortgage loan portfolio to have a larger contribution impact to the overall DOE since DOE is a market value weighted measurement. With these balance sheet dynamics, we continue to actively manage and monitor the contributing factors of our risk profile, including DOE. As the relationship of the fixed rate mortgage loan assets and the associated callable liabilities vary based on market conditions, we evaluate and manage these market driven sensitivities as both portfolios change in balance level and overall proportion.

89

New loans were continually added to the mortgage loan portfolio to replace loans that were prepaid during the period and we continue to actively manage this ongoing growth to position the balance sheet sensitivity to perform within our expected risk tolerances. To effectively manage these changes in the mortgage loan portfolio (including new production loans) and related sensitivity to changes in market conditions, a continued issuance of unswapped callable consolidated obligation bonds with short lock-out periods (generally three months) positioned us to replace called bonds as the interest rate environment continued to remain at historically low levels. The call of higher rate callable bonds and reissuance of these bonds at lower interest rates in this manner generally extends the duration profile of this portfolio as bonds are called that are in-the-money (above market rates) and subsequently reissued at lower interest rates (at market rates). This liability extension corresponds with the expected longer duration profile of the new fixed rate mortgage loans, all else being equal.

As discussed above, as intermediate- and long-term interest rates declined during the period and as we continued to experience prepayments of the fixed rate mortgage loan portfolio, the short lock-out periods of the callable bonds plus some maturities of non-callable bonds provided the opportunity to continue the refinancing of our liabilities. The decline in intermediate- and long-term interest rates during the period also caused the duration profile of the existing portfolio of unswapped callable bonds to shorten along with the fixed rate mortgage loan portfolio. This liability shortening demonstrates the specific duration sensitivity to changes in interest rates at certain shock scenarios where the unswapped callable bonds are more or less sensitive to certain levels of declining interest rates, causing the overall DOE to increase or decrease, similar to the factors causing the changes in DOE for all interest rate shock scenarios. This sensitivity, or convexity, is further described under Item 7A – "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. In addition, issuance of discount notes continued in order to provide adequate liquidity sources to appropriately address customer short-term advance growth and associated capital stock activity during the period. The combination of all these factors contributed to the net DOE changes in all interest rate shock scenarios where the DOE increased in the up 200 interest rate shock scenario and decreased in the base and down 200 shock scenarios. The down shock scenario continues to provide limited information since interest rates remain at historically low levels. This low interest rate environment essentially generates zero interest rates for the short- and mid-term interest rates along the down 200 shocked term structure of interest rates, causing valuation changes to be limited, generating DOE results with marginal information.

With respect to the GSE variable rate MBS portfolio, we generally purchase interest rate caps to offset the impact of embedded caps in this portfolio in rising interest rate scenarios. As expected, these interest rate caps are a satisfactory interest rate risk hedge to rising interest rates and provide an off-setting risk response to the risk profile changes in GSE variable rate MBS with embedded caps. We periodically assess derivative strategies to ensure that overall balance sheet risk is appropriately hedged within established risk appetite metrics and make adjustments to the derivative portfolio as needed. This evaluation is completed considering not only the par value of the variable rate MBS with embedded caps being hedged with purchased caps, but the composition of the purchased cap portfolio and expected prepayments of the variable rate MBS with embedded caps. This evaluation of the relative relationship between the variable rate investment portfolio and the purchased cap portfolio continues to indicate a sufficient hedging relationship. During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, we purchased $288.1 million of variable rate single-family GSE MBS. However, we did not purchase additional interest rate caps during the second quarter of 2016 because the investments did not contain interest rate cap exposure. In addition, we purchased $194.9 million fixed rate multi-family GSE MBS during the current quarter. These fixed rate securities were effectively swapped to LIBOR and impacted DOE only slightly since they are reflected as variable rate instruments and are further described in Item 2 – "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Net Gain (Loss) on Trading Securities."

In calculating DOE, we also calculate our duration gap, which is the difference between the duration of our assets and the duration of our liabilities. Our base duration gap was -0.8 month for June 30, 2016 and 0.5 month for March 31, 2016. As discussed previously, the relatively stable performance of the duration gap was primarily the result of the changes in the fixed rate mortgage loan portfolio and the associated funding decisions made by management in response to changes in the interest rate environment and balance sheet during the second quarter of 2016. All FHLBanks are required to submit this base duration gap number to the Office of Finance as part of the quarterly reporting process created by the Finance Agency.

Market Value of Equity: MVE is the net value of our assets and liabilities. Estimating sensitivity of MVE to changes in interest rates is another measure of interest rate risk. We generally maintain an MVE within limits specified by the Board of Directors in the RMP. The RMP measures our market value risk in terms of the MVE in relation to total regulatory capital stock outstanding (TRCS). TRCS includes all capital stock outstanding, including stock subject to mandatory redemption. As a cooperative, we believe using the TRCS results in an appropriate measure because it reflects our market value relative to the book value of our capital stock. Our RMP stipulates MVE shall not be less than: (1) 100 percent of TRCS under the base case scenario; or (2) 90 percent of TRCS under a ±200 basis point instantaneous parallel shock in interest rates. Table 40 presents MVE as a percent of TRCS. As of June 30, 2016, all scenarios are well above the specified limits and much of the relative level in the ratios during the periods covered by the table can be attributed to the relative level of the fixed rate mortgage loan market values as rates have continued to remain historically low, the general value impact of the refinancing activities of the associated unswapped callable consolidated obligation bonds and the relative level of outstanding capital.

90

The MVE to TRCS ratios can be greatly impacted by the level of capital outstanding based on our capital management approach. Typically, as advances increase and the associated capital level increases, the ratio will generally decline since the new advances are primarily short-term with market values at or near par. Further, as advance balances decrease and the capital level decreases as capital stock is repurchased, the ratio will generally increase. These relationships primarily generate the changes in the MVE/TRCS levels and produce the changes in the ratios in all interest rate scenarios in the table below.

Table 40

Market Value of Equity as a Percent of Total Regulatory Capital Stock
Date	Up 200 Basis Points	Base	Down 200 Basis Points
06/30/2016	169	170	170
03/31/2016	164	167	170
12/31/2015	168	171	177
09/30/2015	165	168	172
06/30/2015	168	169	174

Detail of Derivative Instruments by Type of Instrument by Type of Risk: Various types of derivative instruments are utilized to mitigate the interest rate risks described in the preceding sections as well as to better match the terms of assets and liabilities. We currently employ derivative instruments by designating them as either a fair value or cash flow hedge of an underlying financial instrument or a forecasted transaction, by acting as an intermediary, or in asset/liability management (i.e., an economic hedge). An economic hedge is defined as a derivative hedging specific or non-specific underlying assets, liabilities or firm commitments that either does not qualify for hedge accounting, or for which we have not elected hedge accounting, but is an acceptable hedging strategy under our RMP. For hedging relationships that are not designated for shortcut hedge accounting, we formally assess (both at the hedge’s inception and monthly on an ongoing basis) whether the derivatives used have been highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair values or cash flows of hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future periods. We typically use regression analyses or similar statistical analyses to assess the effectiveness of our long haul hedges. We determine the hedge accounting to be applied when the hedge is entered into by completing detailed documentation, which includes a checklist setting forth criteria that must be met to qualify for hedge accounting.

91

Tables 41 and 42 present the notional amount and fair value amount (fair value includes net accrued interest receivable or payable on the derivative) for derivative instruments by hedged item, hedging instrument, hedging objective and accounting designation (in thousands):

Table 41

06/30/2016
Hedged Item	Hedging Instrument	Hedging Objective	Accounting Designation	Notional Amount		Fair Value Amount
Advances
Fixed rate non-callable advances	Pay fixed, receive variable interest rate swap	Convert the advance’s fixed rate to a variable rate index	Fair Value Hedge	$	3,251,441	$	(121,416	)
Fixed rate callable advances	Pay fixed, receive variable interest rate swap	Convert the advance’s fixed rate to a variable rate index and offset option risk in the advance	Fair Value Hedge	66,000		(709		)
Fixed rate convertible advances	Pay fixed, receive variable interest rate swap	Convert the advance’s fixed rate to a variable rate index and offset option risk in the advance	Fair Value Hedge	1,477,942		(58,286		)
Firm commitment to issue a fixed rate advance	Forward settling interest rate swap	Protect against fair value risk	Fair Value Hedge	173,821		(11,716		)
Investments
Fixed rate non-MBS trading investments	Pay fixed, receive variable interest rate swap	Convert the investment’s fixed rate to a variable rate index	Economic Hedge	1,004,820		(61,521		)
Fixed rate MBS trading investments	Pay fixed, receive variable interest rate swap	Convert the investment’s fixed rate to a variable rate index	Economic Hedge	853,669		(77,534		)
Fixed rate MBS available-for-sale investments	Pay fixed, receive variable interest rate swap	Convert the investment’s fixed rate to a variable rate index	Fair Value Hedge	1,000,923		(66,222		)
Adjustable rate MBS with embedded caps	Interest rate cap	Offset the interest rate cap embedded in a variable rate investment	Economic Hedge	2,922,800		2,072
Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio
Fixed rate mortgage purchase commitments	Mortgage purchase commitment	Protect against fair value risk	Economic Hedge	130,623		827
Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes
Fixed rate non-callable consolidated obligation discount notes with tenors of 6 to 12 months	Receive fixed, pay variable interest rate swap	Convert the discount note's fixed rate to a variable rate	Fair Value Hedge	149,361		113
Consolidated Obligation Bonds
Fixed rate non-callable consolidated obligation bonds	Receive fixed, pay variable interest rate swap	Convert the bond’s fixed rate to a variable rate index	Fair Value Hedge	1,686,820		45,919
Fixed rate callable consolidated obligation bonds	Receive fixed, pay variable interest rate swap	Convert the bond’s fixed rate to a variable rate index and offset option risk in the bond	Fair Value Hedge	445,000		2,854
Complex consolidated obligation bonds	Receive variable with embedded features, pay variable interest rate swap	Reduce interest rate sensitivity and re-pricing gaps by converting the bond’s variable rate to a different variable rate index and/or to offset embedded options risk in the bond	Fair Value Hedge	20,000		(96		)
Callable step-up/step-down consolidated obligation bonds	Receive variable interest rate with embedded features, pay variable interest rate swap	Reduce interest rate sensitivity and repricing gaps by converting the bond’s variable rate to a different variable rate index and/or to offset embedded options risk in the bond	Fair Value Hedge	220,000		486
Variable rate consolidated obligation bonds	Receive variable interest rate, pay variable interest rate swap	Reduce basis risk by converting an undesirable variable rate index in the bond to a more desirable variable rate index	Economic Hedge	295,000		1,844
TOTAL				$	13,698,220	$	(343,385	)

92

Table 42

12/31/2015
Hedged Item	Hedging Instrument	Hedging Objective	Accounting Designation	Notional Amount		Fair Value Amount
Advances
Fixed rate non-callable advances	Pay fixed, receive variable interest rate swap	Convert the advance’s fixed rate to a variable rate index	Fair Value Hedge	$	3,099,956	$	(62,746	)
Fixed rate callable advances	Pay fixed, receive variable interest rate swap	Convert the advance’s fixed rate to a variable rate index and offset option risk in the advance	Fair Value Hedge	66,000		(634		)
Fixed rate convertible advances	Pay fixed, receive variable interest rate swap	Convert the advance’s fixed rate to a variable rate index and offset option risk in the advance	Fair Value Hedge	1,470,842		(57,377		)
Clearly and closely related caps embedded in variable rate advances	Interest rate cap	Offset the interest rate cap embedded in a variable rate advance	Fair Value Hedge	60,000		(94		)
Firm commitment to issue a fixed rate advance	Forward settling interest rate swap	Protect against fair value risk	Fair Value Hedge	129,423		(1,708		)
Investments
Fixed rate non-MBS trading investments	Pay fixed, receive variable interest rate swap	Convert the investment’s fixed rate to a variable rate index	Economic Hedge	1,254,820		(55,350		)
Fixed rate MBS trading investments	Pay fixed, receive variable interest rate swap	Convert the investment’s fixed rate to a variable rate index	Economic Hedge	854,338		(21,731		)
Fixed rate MBS available-for-sale investments	Pay fixed, receive variable interest rate swap	Convert the investment’s fixed rate to a variable rate index	Fair Value Hedge	498,948		(4,259		)
Adjustable rate MBS with embedded caps	Interest rate cap	Offset the interest rate cap embedded in a variable rate investment	Economic Hedge	2,922,800		5,789
Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio
Fixed rate mortgage purchase commitments	Mortgage purchase commitment	Protect against fair value risk	Economic Hedge	66,045		7
Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes
Fixed rate non-callable consolidated obligation discount notes with tenors of 6 to 12 months	Receive fixed, pay variable interest rate swap	Convert the discount note's fixed rate to a variable rate	Fair Value Hedge	648,779		531
Fixed rate non-callable consolidated obligation discount notes with tenors of less than six months	Receive fixed, pay variable interest rate swap	Convert the discount note's fixed rate to a variable rate	Economic Hedge	249,693		133
Consolidated Obligation Bonds
Fixed rate non-callable consolidated obligation bonds	Receive fixed, pay variable interest rate swap	Convert the bond’s fixed rate to a variable rate index	Fair Value Hedge	2,659,820		49,959
Fixed rate callable consolidated obligation bonds	Receive fixed, pay variable interest rate swap	Convert the bond’s fixed rate to a variable rate index and offset option risk in the bond	Fair Value Hedge	780,000		2,607
Complex consolidated obligation bonds	Receive variable with embedded features, pay variable interest rate swap	Reduce interest rate sensitivity and re-pricing gaps by converting the bond’s variable rate to a different variable rate index and/or to offset embedded options risk in the bond	Fair Value Hedge	90,000		(1,402		)
Callable step-up/step-down consolidated obligation bonds	Receive variable interest rate with embedded features, pay variable interest rate swap	Reduce interest rate sensitivity and repricing gaps by converting the bond’s variable rate to a different variable rate index and/or to offset embedded options risk in the bond	Fair Value Hedge	895,000		(1,404		)
Variable rate consolidated obligation bonds	Receive variable interest rate, pay variable interest rate swap	Reduce basis risk by converting an undesirable variable rate index in the bond to a more desirable variable rate index	Economic Hedge	800,000		(701		)
Intermediary Derivatives
Interest rate caps executed with members	Interest rate cap	Offset interest rate caps executed with members by executing interest rate caps with derivatives counterparties	Economic Hedge	8,000		—
TOTAL				$	16,554,464	$	(148,380	)

93

Item 4:Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Senior management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Our disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable level of assurance in achieving their desired objectives; however, in designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

Management, with the participation of the President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), our principal executive officer, and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), our principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2016. Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2016.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II.OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1: Legal Proceedings

We are subject to various pending legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. After consultation with legal counsel, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. Additionally, management does not believe that we are subject to any material pending legal proceedings outside of ordinary litigation incidental to our business.

Item 1A:Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K filed on March 10, 2016, incorporated by reference herein.

Item 2:Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

Item 3:Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4:Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5:Other Information

None.

94

Item 6: Exhibits

Exhibit No.	Description
3.1	Exhibit 3.1 to the FHLBank’s registration statement on Form 10, filed May 15, 2006, and made effective on July 14, 2006 (File No. 000-52004) (the “Form 10 Registration Statement”), Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka Articles and Organization Certificate, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 3.1.
3.2	Exhibit 3.2 to the 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 10, 2016, Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka Amended and Restated Bylaws, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 3.2.
4.1	Exhibit 99.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 5, 2011, Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka Capital Plan, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.1.
10.1	Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 30, 2016, Indemnification Agreement, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.1
10.2	Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 30, 2016, Indemnification Agreement, is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.2
31.1	Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32	Certification of President and Principal Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

95

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka
August 4, 2016	By: /s/ Andrew J. Jetter
Date	Andrew J. Jetter
	President and Chief Executive Officer
August 4, 2016	By: /s/ William W. Osborn
Date	William W. Osborn
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

96