XML 32 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
Our cash and cash equivalents and other investments consist of the following:
 
December 31, 2018
 
Cost Basis
 
Unrealized
Gains
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair Value
 
(in millions)
Cash
$
34

 
$

 
$

 
$
34

Cash equivalents:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. and Canadian government obligations
623

 

 

 
623

Other debt securities
25

 

 

 
25

Total cash and cash equivalents
$
682

 
$

 
$

 
$
682

Nonqualified employee benefit trusts
17

 
2

 

 
19

 
December 31, 2017
 
Cost Basis
 
Unrealized
Gains
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair Value
 
(in millions)
Cash
$
120

 
$

 
$

 
$
120

Cash equivalents:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. and Canadian government obligations
710

 

 

 
710

Other debt securities
5

 

 

 
5

Total cash and cash equivalents
$
835

 
$

 
$

 
$
835

Nonqualified employee benefit trusts
17

 
2

 

 
19


Under our short-term investment policy, we may invest our cash balances, either directly or through mutual funds, in several types of investment-grade securities, including notes and bonds issued by governmental entities or corporations. Securities issued by governmental entities include those issued directly by the U.S. and Canadian federal governments; those issued by state, local or other governmental entities; and those guaranteed by entities affiliated with governmental entities.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables present assets and liabilities included in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 that are recognized at fair value on a recurring basis, and indicate the fair value hierarchy utilized to determine such fair value:
 
December 31, 2018
 
Total Fair Value
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
(in millions)
Cash equivalents
$
648

 
$
648

 
$

 
$

Nonqualified employee benefit trusts
19

 
19

 

 

Derivative assets
2

 

 
2

 

Embedded derivative liability
(21
)
 

 
(21
)
 

 
December 31, 2017
 
Total Fair Value
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
(in millions)
Cash equivalents
$
715

 
$
715

 
$

 
$

Nonqualified employee benefit trusts
19

 
19

 

 

Derivative assets
1

 

 
1

 

Derivative liabilities
(12
)
 

 
(12
)
 

Embedded derivative liability
(25
)
 

 
(25
)
 


Cash Equivalents
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, our cash equivalents consisted primarily of U.S. and Canadian government obligations and money market mutual funds that invest in U.S. government obligations and other investment-grade securities.
Nonqualified Employee Benefit Trusts
We maintain trusts associated with certain nonqualified supplemental pension plans. The fair values of the trust assets are based on daily quoted prices in an active market, which represents the net asset values of the shares held in the trusts, and are included on our consolidated balance sheets in other assets. Debt securities are accounted for as available-for-sale securities. In 2018, as a result of our adoption of ASU 2016-01 on January 1, 2018, changes in the fair value of equity securities in the trust assets are recognized through earnings. See Note 3—New Accounting Standards for additional information.
Derivative Instruments
The derivative instruments that we may use are primarily natural gas fixed price swaps, natural gas basis swaps and natural gas options traded in the OTC markets with multi-national commercial banks, other major financial institutions or large energy companies. The natural gas derivative contracts represent anticipated natural gas needs for future periods and settlements are scheduled to coincide with anticipated natural gas purchases during those future periods. The natural gas derivative contracts settle using primarily a NYMEX futures price index. To determine the fair value of these instruments, we use quoted market prices from NYMEX and standard pricing models with inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data such as forward curves supplied by an industry-recognized independent third party. See Note 15—Derivative Financial Instruments for additional information.
Embedded Derivative Liability
Under the terms of our strategic venture with CHS, if our credit rating as determined by two of three specified credit rating agencies is below certain levels, we are required to make a non-refundable yearly payment of $5 million to CHS. Since our credit ratings were below certain levels in 2016, 2017 and 2018, we made a payment of $5 million to CHS in each year. These payments will continue on a yearly basis until the earlier of the date that our credit rating is upgraded to or above certain levels by two of the three specified credit rating agencies or February 1, 2026. This obligation is recognized on our consolidated balance sheets as an embedded derivative. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the embedded derivative liability of $21 million and $25 million, respectively, is included in other current liabilities and other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. Included in other operating—net in our consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is a net loss of $1 million, $4 million and $23 million, respectively.
The inputs into the fair value measurement include the probability of future upgrades and downgrades of our credit rating based on historical credit rating movements of other public companies and the discount rates to be applied to potential annual payments based on applicable credit spreads of other public companies at different credit rating levels. Based on these inputs, our fair value measurement is classified as Level 2.
See Note 17—Noncontrolling Interests for additional information regarding our strategic venture with CHS.
Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts and estimated fair value of our financial instruments are as follows:
 
December 31,
 
2018
 
2017
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
(in millions)
Long-term debt
$
4,698

 
$
4,265

 
$
4,692

 
$
4,800


The fair value of our long-term debt was based on quoted prices for identical or similar liabilities in markets that are not active or valuation models in which all significant inputs and value drivers are observable and, as a result, they are classified as Level 2 inputs.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, as well as instruments included in other current assets and other current liabilities that meet the definition of financial instruments, approximate fair values because of their short-term maturities.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
We also have assets and liabilities that may be measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis, but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence of impairment, when there is allocation of purchase price in an acquisition or when a new liability is being established that requires fair value measurement. These include long-lived assets, goodwill and other intangible assets and investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries, such as equity method investments, which may be written down to fair value as a result of impairment. The fair value measurements related to each of these rely primarily on Company-specific inputs and the Company’s assumptions about the use of the assets. Since certain of the Company’s assumptions would involve inputs that are not observable, these fair values would reside within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
We review the carrying value of our goodwill, definite lived intangible assets, and investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries to assess recoverability as part of our annual impairment review in the fourth quarter of each year. As part of the assessment process when performing impairment tests, we estimate many factors including future sales volume, selling prices, raw materials costs, operating rates, operating expenses, inflation, discount rates, exchange rates, tax rates and capital spending. The assumptions we make are material estimates that are used in the impairment testing.
Our equity method investment in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, PLNL, operates an ammonia plant that relies on natural gas supplied by NGC pursuant to the NGC Contract. As part of our impairment assessment of our equity method investment in PLNL during the fourth quarter of 2016, we determined the carrying value exceeded the fair value and recognized a $134 million impairment charge in 2016. See Note 8—Equity Method Investments for additional information.