form10q.htm

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company x< /div>

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the exchange Act). Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: At November 15, 2010 there were 10,398,282 shares of issuer’s common stock outstanding.

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP

INDEX

			Page
			Number
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

		CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009	3

		CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009	4

		CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009	5

		CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009	6

		CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009	7

		CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.	8

	ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	23

	ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	40

	ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	43

	ITEM 4T.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	43

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION			45

SIGNATURES			47

EXHIBITS

31.1	RULE 13A–14(A) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
31.2	RULE 13A–14(A) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
32	SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Balance Sheets

September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009

	Unaudited			Audited
	September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	33,274,949		$	14,921,517
Interest-bearing deposits in banks		10,579,402			43,236,287
Federal funds sold		11,295,000			11,340,000
Securities available for sale, at fair value		161,798,416			120,526,900
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		3,020,200			3,253,400
Other equity securities, at cost		1,010,000			1,010,000
Loans held for sale		699,500			-

Loans		413,979,784			334,138,932
Less allowance for loan losses		6,534,200			6,060,460
Loans, net		407,445,584			328,078,472

Premises and equipment, net		20,420,596			15,590,120
Premises held for sale		1,080,000			1,080,000
Accrued interest receivable		3,070,999			2,799,375
Foreclosed assets		2,786,657			1,795,544
Intangible assets		1,489,043			1,570,832
Cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance		15,215,640			14,756,771
Other assets		10,137,752			11,988,301
	$	683,323,738		$	571,947,519
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing	$	48,013,660		$	28,881,905
Interest-bearing		487,378,270			397,724,617
Total deposits		535,391,930			426,606,522
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements		35,092,163			32,843,465
Other borrowings		42,500,000			42,500,000
Accrued interest payable		690,677			706,321
Other liabilities		6,563,478			8,474,370
Total liabilities		620,238,248			511,130,678

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' equity
Preferred stock, par value $0.01; 1,000,000 shares authorized;no shares issued		-			-
Common stock, par value $0.01; 25,000,000 shares authorized;11,454,344 issued and outstanding		114,543			114,543
Capital surplus		41,245,482			40,609,551
Retained earnings		38,754,134			38,984,165
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net tax of $562,741 and $1,591,489		(844,112	)		(2,387,234	)
Unearned employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) shares,209,332 and 242,385 shares		(2,093,325	)		(2,423,850	)
		77,176,722			74,897,175
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,056,062 and 1,055,084 shares		(14,091,232	)		(14,080,334	)
Total stockholders' equity		63,085,490			60,816,841
	$	683,323,738		$	571,947,519

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

	For the Three Months						For the Nine Months
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Interest income
Interest and fees on loans	$	6,135,980		$	4,599,933		$	17,218,926		$	13,721,630
Interest on loans held for sale		6,476			-			6,862			-
Interest on taxable securities		1,006,253			780,996			2,571,814			2,921,284
Interest on nontaxable securities		211,891			296,394			748,978			882,416
Interest on federal funds sold		11,160			7,694			37,813			39,670
Interest on deposits in other banks		24,824			748			114,730			1,182
		7,396,584			5,685,765			20,699,123			17,566,182

Interest expense
Interest on deposits		1,631,079			1,478,611			4,667,526			5,049,607
Interest on other borrowings		658,987			500,715			1,819,800			1,829,653
		2,290,066			1,979,326			6,487,326			6,879,260

Net interest income		5,106,518			3,706,439			14,211,797			10,686,922
Provision for loan losses		950,000			2,500,000			2,100,000			3,800,000
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		4,156,518			1,206,439			12,111,797			6,886,922

Noninterest income
Service charges on deposit accounts		1,112,390			950,893			2,918,408			2,595,376
Other service charges, commissions and fees		642,817			338,490			1,511,282			1,060,600
Brokerage fees		253,572			251,854			732,626			662,177
Mortgage origination fees		227,052			66,364			336,671			275,544
Bank owned life insurance		152,888			155,285			458,879			464,767
Gain on sales of securities		70,666			469,455			230,372			835,584
Other		18,834			11,575			56,856			33,870
		2,478,219			2,243,916			6,245,094			5,927,918

Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits		3,445,912			2,295,513			8,984,760			6,719,869
Equipment		303,837			221,077			810,350			760,243
Occupancy		423,730			312,000			1,059,391			901,263
Advertising and marketing		166,051			146,962			410,413			345,191
Legal and accounting		112,077			117,868			439,720			390,526
Consulting and other professional fees		71,106			69,669			207,821			222,078
Directors fees and retirement		141,711			154,608			419,133			460,824
Telecommunications		131,765			52,861			304,497			169,189
Supplies		97,787			46,384			250,993			130,687
Data processing fees		604,495			431,608			1,596,089			1,144,789
(Gain) loss on sales and write-downs of other real estate owned		(30	)		80,000			(343,464	)		384,068
Foreclosed asset expenses		181,295			78,561			779,002			171,789
FDIC insurance and other regulatory fees		283,262			136,192			681,932			501,078
Impairment loss on intangible asset		1,000,000			-			1,000,000			-
Other operating		816,187			306,871			1,908,311			1,004,909
		7,779,185			4,450,174			18,508,948			13,306,503

Loss before income taxes		(1,144,448	)		(999,819	)		(152,057	)		(491,663	)

Applicable income tax benefits		(701,849	)		(532,945	)		(635,766	)		(574,189	)

Net income (loss)	$	(442,599	)	$	(466,874	)	$	483,709		$	82,526

Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.05	)	$	0.05		$	0.01
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.05	)	$	0.05		$	0.01

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

	For the Three Months						For the Nine Months
	2010			2009			2010			2009

Net income (loss)	$	(442,599	)	$	(466,874	)	$	483,709		$	85,526

Other comprehensive income:
Accretion of realized gain on terminated cash flow hedge, net of tax of $35,187 and $35,187 for the quarter and $105,560 and $105,560 for the year to date		(52,780	)		(52,780	)		(158,340	)		(158,340	)
Unrealized holding gains on investments arising during the period, net of tax of $776,480 and $909,531 for the quarter and $1,226,457 and $842,773 for the year to date		1,164,720			1,364,297			1,839,685			1,264,159
Reclassification adjustment for investment gains included in net income, net of tax of $28,266 and ($187,782) for the quarter and $92,149 and ($334,234) for the year to date		(42,400	)		(281,673	)		(138,223	)		(501,350	)

Total other comprehensive income		1,069,540			1,029,844			1,543,122			604,469

Comprehensive income	$	626,941		$	562,970		$	2,026,831		$	686,995

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and

The Year Ended December 31, 2009

	Common Stock										Unearned						Accumulated Other
	Shares		Par Value		Capital Surplus			Retained Earnings			ESOP Shares			Treasury Stock			Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total
Balance, December 31, 2008		11,452,344	$	114,523	$	39,861,237		$	41,357,209		$	(2,864,550	)	$	(13,569,813	)	$	(2,685,633	)	$	62,212,973
Net loss		-		-		-			(1,652,319	)		-			-			-			(1,652,319	)
Cash dividend declared, $0.32 per share		-		-		-			(720,725	)		-			-			-			(720,725	)
Stock-based compensation expense		-		-		807,402			-			-			-			-			807,402
Repurchase of 62,026 shares of stock for the treasury		-		-		-			-			-			(516,426	)		-			(516,426	)
Issuance of 440 shares of common stock from the treasury		-		-		(2,602	)		-			-			5,905			-			3,303
Issuance of restricted shares of common stock		2,000		20		(20	)		-			-			-			-			-
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-			-			-			-			298,399			298,399
Tax benefit shortfall from stock-based compensation plans		-		-		(58,494	)		-			-			-			-			(58,494	)
ESOP shares earned, 44,070 shares		-		-		(73,946	)		-			440,700			-			-			366,754
Tax benefit on ESOP expense		-		-		75,974			-			-			-			-			75,974
Balance, December 31, 2009		11,454,344	$	114,543	$	40,609,551		$	38,984,165		$	(2,423,850	)	$	(14,080,334	)	$	(2,387,234	)	$	60,816,841
Net income		-		-		-			483,709			-			-			-			483,709
Cash dividend declared, $0.27 per share		-		-		-			(713,740	)		-			-			-			(713,740	)
Stock-based compensation expense		-		-		605,389			-			-			-			-			605,389
Repurchase of 1,578 shares of stock for the Treasury		-		-		-			-			-			(18,904	)		-			(18,904	)
Issuance of 600 shares of common stock from the treasury		-		-		(1,169	)		-			-			8,006			-			6,837
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-			-			-			-			1,543,122			1,543,122
Excess tax expense from stock based compensation plans		-		-		(11,352	)		-			-			-			-			(11,352	)
ESOP shares earned, 33,053 shares		-		-		14,164			-			330,525			-			-			344,689
Tax benefit on ESOP expense		-		-		28,899			-			-			-			-			28,899
Balance, September 30, 2010		11,454,344	$	114,543	$	41,245,482		$	38,754,134		$	(2,093,325	)	$	(14,091,232	)	$	(844,112	)	$	63,085,490

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

	For the Nine Months
	2010			2009
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	483,709		$	82,526
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		685,379			679,419
Deposit premium amortization		221,498			-
Provision for loan losses		2,100,000			3,800,000
ESOP compensation expense		344,689			350,622
Stock-based compensation expense		605,389			605,389
Net gain on sales of securities available for sale		(230,372	)		(835,584	)
Accretion of gain on termination of cash flow hedge		(263,900	)		(263,900	)
Increase in bank owned life insurance		(458,869	)		(464,768	)
Excess tax shortfall related to stock-based compensation plans		11,352			-
Excess tax expense related to ESOP		(28,899	)		-
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable		(48,539	)		26,693
Decrease in interest payable		(54,952	)		(448,300	)
(Increase) decrease in taxes receivable		423,349			(1,091,789	)
(Gain) loss on sales and write-downs of other real estate owned		(343,464	)		384,068
Impairment loss on intangible assets		1,000,000			-
Net other operating activities		(1,472,876	)		762,688
Total adjustments		2,489,785			3,504,538
Net cash provided by operating activities		2,973,494			3,587,064

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
(Increase) decrease in interest-bearing deposits in banks		32,656,885			(4,329,134	)
Purchases of securities available for sale		(96,839,224	)		(68,130,095	)
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale		35,367,507			27,847,943
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale		23,266,344			57,191,479
Net change in Federal Home Loan Bank stock		233,200			(67,600	)
Decrease in federal funds sold		45,000			17,221,000
(Increase) decrease in loans, net		(33,845,119	)		2,228,405
Purchase of premises and equipment		(2,068,015	)		(552,280	)
Proceeds from acquisition activity		40,530,558			-
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned		2,560,117			1,078,430
Net cash provided by investing activities		1,907,253			32,488,148

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Increase (decrease) in deposits		11,932,246			(16,234,681	)
Increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase		2,248,698			(6,286,952	)
Excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation plans		(11,352	)		-
Excess tax related to ESOP		28,899			-
Repayment of other borrowings		-			(10,000,000	)
Purchase of treasury stock, net		(12,066	)		(422,037	)
Dividends paid to stockholders		(713,740	)		(611,304	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		13,472,685			(33,554,974	)

Net increase in cash and due from banks		18,353,432			2,520,238
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period		14,921,517			10,159,602
Cash and due from banks at end of period	$	33,274,949		$	12,679,840

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	6,502,970		$	7,327,559
Taxes		9,000			517,600

NONCASH TRANSACTIONS
Decrease in unrealized losses on securities available for sale	$	(1,701,462	)	$	(1,271,348	)
Principal balances of loans transferred to other real estate owned		3,252,763			288,954

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The accompanying consolidated financial information of the Company is unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary. Significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near-term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of foreclosed real estate, contingent assets and liabilities, deferred tax assets, other-than-temporary impairments of securities and the fair value of financial instruments.

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 - EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic earnings (loss) per share represent income (loss) available attributable to common shareholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding unallocated shares of the Employee Stock Ownership Plan. The table below sets forth our earnings (loss) per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

	Three Months						Nine Months
	2010			2009			2010		2009
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Net income (loss)	$	(442,599	)	$	(466,874	)	$	483,709	$	82,526
Weighted average common shares outstanding		10,139,275			10,072,438			10,073,033		10,046,325
Total basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.05	)	$	0.05	$	0.01

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Net income (loss)	$	(442,599	)	$	(466,874	)	$	483,709	$	82,526
Weighted average common shares outstanding		10,139,275			10,072,438			10,073,033		10,046,325
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock		-			-			1,648		-
Weighted average dilutive common shares outstanding		10,139,275			10,072,438			10,074,681		10,046,325
Total diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.05	)	$	0.05	$	0.01

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, potential common shares of 689,570 and 575,166 were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because the assumed exercise of such shares would be anti-dilutive.

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 3 - SHARE BASED COMPENSATION

On May 17, 2006, our stockholders approved the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The purpose of the Plan is to promote the long-term growth and profitability of Heritage Financial Group, to provide directors, advisory directors, officers and employees of Heritage Financial Group and its affiliates with an incentive to achieve corporate objectives, to attract and retain individuals of outstanding competence and to provide such individuals with an equity interest in Heritage Financial Group. Under the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has discretion to award up to 771,149 shares, of which 550,281 were available as stock options or stock appreciation rights and 220,328 shares were available as restricted stock awards. During 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors granted stock options and tandem stock appreciation rights totaling 520,605 shares and granted restricted stock awards totaling 207,905 shares. During the first quarter of 2008, an additional 19,750 of tandem stock option and stock appreciation rights, and 9,505 of restricted stock awards were granted to employees. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2009, 6,000 tandem stock options and stock appreciation rights and 2,000 restricted stock awards were granted to employees. There were no grants of restricted stock, stock options, or stock appreciation rights during the quarter ended September 30, 2010. All stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock awards vest over a period of five years.

The Company granted restricted awards that may not be sold or otherwise transferred until certain restrictions have lapsed. The share based expense for these awards was determined based on the market price of our stock at the date of grant applied to the total number of shares that were anticipated to fully vest, amortized over the vesting period. As of September 30, 2010, there was approximately $388,000 of unrecognized compensation associated with these awards. For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we recognized compensation expense associated with these awards of approximately $124,000. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we recognized compensation expense associated with these awards of approximately $372,000.

We recognized compensation expense related to stock options of approximately $78,000, for the three months ended September 30, 2010, and 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we recognized compensation expense related to these options of $233,000. At September 30, 2010, there was approximately $239,000 of unrecognized compensation related to stock options.

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 4 - SECURITIES

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale with gross unrealized gains and losses are summarized as follows:

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
September 30, 2010:
U. S. Government sponsored agency securities (GSE’s)*	$	44,077,135	$	643,969	$	(11,268	)	$	44,709,836
State and municipal securities		21,129,344		476,613		(503,966	)		21,101,991
Corporate debt securities		2,172,057		-		(412,665	)		1,759,392
GSE residential mortgage-backed securities		88,943,665		1,599,467		(18,657	)		90,524,475
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities		3,274,033		76,141		-			3,350,174
Total debt securities		159,596,234		2,796,190		(946,556	)		161,445,868
Equity securities		434,801		21,599		(103,852	)		352,548
Total securities**	$	160,031,035	$	2,817,789	$	(1,050,408	)	$	161,798,416
December 31, 2009:
U. S. Government sponsored agency securities (GSE’s)*	$	30,571,605	$	190,036	$	(299,664	)	$	30,461,977
State and municipal securities		30,142,545		196,013		(1,215,694	)		29,122,864
Corporate debt securities		2,178,999		44,976		(313,757	)		1,910,218
GSE residential mortgage-backed securities		54,091,124		449,796		(4,682	)		54,536,238
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities		3,859,494		15,015		(30	)		3,874,479
Total debt securities		120,843,767		895,836		(1,833,827	)		119,905,776
Equity securities		751,521		47,999		(178,396	)		621,124
Total securities**	$	121,595,288	$	943,835	$	(2,012,223	)	$	120,526,900

Such as Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and Federal Home Loan Banks.

At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company held no securities of any single issuer (excluding the U.S. Government and federal agencies) with a book value that exceeded 10% of stockholders’ equity.

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 4 - SECURITIES (Continued)

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities available for sale as of September 30, 2010 by contractual maturity are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities in mortgage-backed securities because the mortgages underlying the securities may be called or repaid without penalty. Therefore, these securities are not included in the maturity categories in the following maturity summary.

	Amortized Cost		Fair Value

Due from one year to five years	$	7,622,057	$	7,242,693
Due from five to ten years		19,575,939		19,868,597
Due after ten years		40,180,540		40,459,929
Mortgage-backed securities		92,217,698		93,874,649
	$	159,596,234	$	161,445,868

Securities with a carrying value of $65,984,713 and $46,814,000 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, repurchase agreements and for other purposes required or permitted by law.

Gains and losses on sales of securities available for sale consist of the following:

	September 30, 2010			September 30, 2009

Gross gains on sales of securities	$	246,410		$	873,413
Gross losses on sales of securities		(16,038	)		(37,829	)
Net realized gains on sales of securities available for sale	$	230,372		$	855,584

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 4 - SECURITIES (Continued)

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities aggregated by category and length of time that securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses

September 30, 2010:
U.S. Government sponsored agency securities (GSE’s)	$	1,850,077	$	(11,268	)	$	-	$	-		$	1,850,077	$	(11,268	)
State and municipal securities		149,325		(675	)		4,434,182		(503,291	)		4,583,507		(503,966	)
Corporate securities		928,642		(86,469	)		830,750		(326,196	)		1,759,392		(412,665	)
GSE residential mortgage- backed securities		4,552,463		(18,657	)		-		-			4,552,463		(18,657	)
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities		-		-			-		-			-		-
Subtotal, debt securities		7,480,507		(117,069	)		5,264,932		(829,487	)		12,745,439		(946,556	)
Equity securities		-		-			330,949		(103,852	)		330,949		(103,852	)
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	7,480,507	$	(117,069	)	$	5,595,881	$	(933,339	)	$	13,076,388	$	(1,050,408	)

December 31, 2009:
U.S. Government sponsored agency securities (GSE’s)	$	14,295,966	$	(299,664	)	$	-	$	-		$	14,295,966	$	(299,664	)
State and municipal securities		8,125,696		(311,298	)		10,722,375		(904,396	)		18,848,071		(1,215,694	)
Corporate debt securities		-		-			845,308		(313,757	)		845,308		(313,757	)
GSE residential mortgage- backed securities		2,883,976		(4,682	)		-		-			2,883,976		(4,682	)
Private label residential Mortgage-backed securities		24,344		(30	)		-		-			24,344		(30	)
Subtotal, debt securities		25,329,982		(615,674	)		11,567,683		(1,218,153	)		36,897,665		(1,833,827	)
Equity securities		-		-			256,404		(178,396	)		256,404		(178,396	)
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	25,329,982	$	(615,674	)	$	11,824,087	$	(1,396,549	)	$	37,154,069	$	(2,012,223	)

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation.

In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred and industry analysts’ reports. As management has the intent and ability to hold the securities until maturity, or for the foreseeable future and due to the fact that the unrealized losses relate primarily to changes in interest rates and do not affect the expected cash flows of the underlying collateral or issuer, no declines are deemed to be other-than-temporary.

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 4 - SECURITIES (Continued)

The investment in the common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta is accounted for by the cost method, which also represents par value, and is made for long-term business affiliation reasons. In addition, this investment is subject to restrictions relating to sale, transfer or other disposition. Dividends are recognized in income when declared. The carrying value of this investment at September 30, 2010 is $3,020,200. The estimated fair value of this investment is $3,020,200 as of September 30, 2010, and therefore it is not considered impaired.

Other equity securities represent an investment in the common stock of the Chattahoochee Bank of Georgia (“Chattahoochee”), a de novo bank in Gainesville, Georgia. The Company accounts for this investment by the cost method. This investment represents approximately 4.9% of the outstanding shares of Chattahoochee. Since its initial capital raise, Chattahoochee has not had any stock transactions, and therefore, no fair market value is readily available. The carrying value of this investment at September 30, 2010, is $1,010,000. The Company plans to hold this investment for the foreseeable future, and does not consider it impaired as of September 30, 2010.

NOTE 5 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (FASB ASC 820), Fair Value Measurements. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures applies to reported balances that are required or permitted to be measured at fair value under existing accounting pronouncements; accordingly, the standard does not require any new fair value measurements of reported balances.

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Level 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions ab out market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 5 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the assets or liabilities, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

The table below presents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2010, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.

	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Assets
Available for sale investment securities	$	21,600	$	161,776,816	$	-	$	161,798,416
Total assets at fair value	$	21,600	$	161,776,816	$	-	$	161,798,416

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 5 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheet, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Loan impairment is reported when full payment under the loan terms is not expected. In accordance with the provisions of the loan impairment guidance (FASB ASC 310-10-35), individual loans were written down to their fair value. Write downs of impaired loans are estimated using the present value of expected cash flows or the appraised value of the underlying collateral discounted as necessary due to management’s estimates of changes in economic conditions. A portion of the allowance for loan losses is allocated to impaired loans if the value of such loans is deemed to be less than the unpaid balance. If these allocations cause the allowance for loan losses to require an increase, such increase is reported as a component of the provision for loan losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when managem ent believes the uncollectibility of a loan is confirmed. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the loan impairment as non-recurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the loan impairment as non-recurring Level 3.

Foreclosed assets are adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the loans to foreclosed assets. Subsequently, foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the foreclosed assets as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 3.

At September 30, 2010, there were no impaired loans reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 valuation inputs. Impaired loans with a carrying value of $12,172,158 were reduced by specific valuation allowance allocations totaling $2,001,164 for a total reported fair value of $10,170,994 on collateral valuations utilizing Level 3 valuation inputs at September 30, 2010.

Fair Value Option

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (FASB ASC 820) allows companies to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The changes in fair value are recognized in earnings and the assets and liabilities measured under this methodology are required to be displayed separately on the balance sheet. While this became effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2008, the Company has not elected the fair value option that is offered.

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 5 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based on discounted cash flows or other valuation techniques. These techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments:

Cash, Due From Banks, Interest-Bearing Deposits in Banks and Federal Funds Sold: The carrying amount of cash, due from banks, interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions and federal funds sold approximates fair value.

Securities: Fair value of securities is based on available quoted market prices. The carrying amount of equity securities with no readily determinable fair value approximates fair value.

Loans held for sale: The carrying amount of loans held for sale approximates fair value.

Loans: The carrying amount of variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit risk approximates fair value. The fair value of fixed-rate loans is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers with similar credit quality. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows or underlying collateral values, where applicable.

Deposits: The carrying amount of demand deposits, savings deposits and variable-rate certificates of deposit approximates fair value. The fair value of fixed-rate certificates of deposit is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows using interest rates currently being offered for certificates of similar maturities.

Federal Funds Purchased and Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements: The fair value of fixed rate federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows using the current incremental borrowing rates for similar type borrowing arrangements.

Other Borrowings: The carrying amount of variable rate advances approximates fair value. The fair value of fixed rate advances is estimated based on discounted contractual cash flows using the current incremental borrowing rates for similar type borrowing arrangements.

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 5 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

Accrued Interest: The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates fair value.

Off-Balance-Sheet Instruments: The carrying amount of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit approximates fair value.

The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company's financial instruments were as follows:

	September 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash, due from banks and interest-bearing deposits in banks	$	43,854,351	$	43,854,351	$	58,157,804	$	58,157,804
Federal funds sold	$	11,295,000	$	11,295,000	$	11,340,000	$	11,340,000
Securities available for sale	$	161,798,416	$	161,798,416	$	120,526,900	$	120,526,900
Federal home loan bank stock	$	3,020,200	$	3,020,200	$	3,253,400	$	3,253,400
Other equity securities	$	1,010,000	$	1,010,000	$	1,010,000	$	1,010,000

Loans held for sale	$	699,500	$	699,500	$	-	$	-

Loans	$	413,979,784	$	415,453,453	$	334,138,932	$	341,971,372
Allowance for loan losses		6,534,200		-		6,060,460		-
Loans, net	$	407,445,584	$	415,453,453	$	328,078,472	$	341,971,372

Accrued interest receivable	$	3,070,999	$	3,070,999	$	2,799,379	$	2,799,379

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	535,391,930	$	533,453,344	$	426,606,522	$	424,097,453

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements	$	35,092,163	$	37,976,377	$	32,843,465	$	35,285,910

Other borrowings	$	42,500,000	$	46,879,887	$	42,500,000	$	44,563,744

Accrued interest payable	$	690,677	$	690,677	$	706,321	$	706,321

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6 - ACQUISITION ACTIVITY

Five Branches of The Park Avenue Bank

On May 24, 2010, the Company completed an acquisition of five branches of The Park Avenue Bank (“PAB”), two in Statesboro and one each in Baxley, Hazlehurst and Adel, Georgia. The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:

(dollars in thousands)	Acquired from PAB		Fair Value and Other Adjustments				As Recorded by Heritage Financial Group
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,183	$	39,379		(a)	$	40,562
Premises and equipment		3,448		-				3,448
Loans		51,941		(149	)	(b)		51,792
Core deposit intangibles		-		1,130		(c)		1,130
Other assets		245		-				245
Total Assets	$	56,817	$	40,360			$	97,177

Liabilities
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	15,564	$	-			$	15,564
Interest-bearing deposits		81,289		268		(d)		81,557
Other liabilities		39		17		(e)		56
Total Liabilities	$	96,892	$	285			$	97,177

Explanations

(a)

The adjustment represents the cash received from PAB to reflect the acquisition of excess liabilities assumed over assets purchased.

(b)

The adjustment represents the adjustment to fair market value of the loans assumed in the transaction.

(c)

The adjustment represents the consideration paid for the value of the core deposit base assumed in the acquisition. The core deposit asset was recorded as an identifiable intangible asset and will be amortized on an accelerated basis over the average life of the deposit base, estimated to be seven years.

(d)

The adjustment is necessary because the weighted average interest rate of the CD's acquired exceeded the cost of similar funding at the time of acquisition. The fair value adjustment will be amortized to reduce interest expense on a declining basis over the average life of the portfolio.

(e)

The adjustment represents additional liabilities assumed in the transaction.

The Company did not acquire any loans with deteriorated credit quality as of the acquisition date in the PAB branch transaction. Accordingly, the Company accounts for the loans acquired in this transaction under FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations.

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6 - ACQUISITION ACTIVITY (Continued)

The Tattnall Bank

On December 4, 2009, the Company participated in a federally assisted acquisition of substantially all of the assets and assumption of substantially all of the liabilities of The Tattnall Bank (“Tattnall”) from the FDIC. Tattnall operated two branch offices in the Southeast Georgia markets of Reidsville and Collins. The Company’s bid included a discount payment from the FDIC totaling $15.0 million. The Company did not enter into a loss-sharing agreement with the FDIC.

Initially, the Company established a contingent liability in conjunction with this transaction to cover the costs to maintain and dispose of problem assets acquired in the Tattnall transaction. As of December 31, 2009, the balance of this contingent liability was $2.1 million. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company determined that this contingent liability should be reflected as a further reduction in the fair market value of the loans acquired. In addition, the Company determined it should record expenses related to these problem assets as charges during the period in which they occur, rather than as a reduction to the contingent liability. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded expenses related to these problem assets of approximately $297,000. The Company estimates i t will incur approximately $1.8 million in additional expenses resolving these problem assets over the next five years.

On the date of acquisition, the Company estimated the future cash flows of the loan portfolio and made the adjustments necessary to reflect the loans at fair value. At each quarter end subsequent to the acquisition, the Company reviews the estimates of future cash flows based on current information and makes the necessary adjustments to continue reflecting the assets at their fair value.

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 6 - ACQUISITION ACTIVITY (Continued)

The following table represents the loans receivables at the acquisition date:

(dollars in thousands)	Acquired loans without deterioration in credit quality			Acquired loans with deterioration in credit quality			Total loans acquired
Contractually required principal and interest	$	10,156		$	27,530		$	37,686
Non-accretable difference		(1,358	)		(9,994	)		(11,352	)
Cash flows expected to be collected		8,798			17,536			26,334
Accretable yield		(1,090	)		(2,480	)		(3,570	)
Basis in acquired loans	$	7,708		$	15,056		$	22,764

The following table is a summary of changes in the accretable yields of acquired loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2010:

(dollars in thousands)	Acquired loans without deterioration in credit quality			Acquired loans with deterioration in credit quality			Total loans acquired
Balance, December 31, 2009	$	1,025		$	2,352		$	3,377
Transfers from non-accretable difference to accretable yield		318			494			812
Accretion		(771	)		(1,497	)		(2,268	)
Balance, September 30, 2010	$	572		$	1,349		$	1,921

The Company recognizes that the determination of the initial fair value of loans at the acquisition date involves a high degree of judgment and complexity. The carrying value of the acquired loans reflects management’s best estimate of the fair value of these assets as of the acquisition date. However, the amount the Company ultimately recognizes on these assets could differ materially from the value reflected in these financial statements, based upon the timing and amount of collections on the acquired loans in future periods. To the extent the actual values recognized for the acquired loans are less than the Company’s estimate, additional losses will be incurred. These fair value estimates are considered preliminary, and are subject to change for up to one year after the closing d ate of the acquisition as additional information relative to the closing date fair values becomes available.

Index

HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 7 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent events and transactions that occurred after September 30, 2010 but prior to November 15, 2010, the date these financial statements were available to be issued, have been evaluated for potential recognition or disclosure in these financial statements.

As previously announced, the Company adopted a plan to reorganize from a two-tier mutual holding company to a full stock holding company and will undertake a "second-step" offering of shares of the new holding company's common stock in subscription, community and syndicated offerings. The Company received conditional approval from the Office of Thrift Supervision on October 12, 2010 to convert and reorganize from a two-tier mutual holding company structure to a full stock holding company structure. In addition, the proposed new holding company, Heritage Financial Group, Inc. received approval from the OTS to commence a “second-step” stock offering of new shares of common stock in connection with the conversion of Heritage MHC. The new holding company’s registration statement relating to the sale of its common stock was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2010 and the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance has approved its acquisition of HeritageBank of the South.

A proxy statement has been mailed to shareholders and depositors, who will vote to approve the plan of conversion on November 23, 2010. The conversion and offering is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter, subject to shareholder, depositor and regulatory approvals. Keefe Bruyette & Woods will manage the subscription and community offerings and will serve as the sole book-running manager for the offering. Sterne Agee & Leach will serve as co-manager for the syndicated offering.

In October 2010, the Company declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.09 per share. The dividend was paid on October 20, 2010, to stockholders of record as of October 15, 2010.

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements.

This report contains certain ‘forward-looking statements’ that may be identified by the use of such words as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated” with respect to our financial condition. Results of operations and business are subject to various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these estimates and most other statements that are not historical in nature. These factors include, but are not limited to, general and local economic conditions, changes in interest rates, deposit flows, demand for mortgage, consumer and other loans, real estate values, competition, changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines, changes in legislation or regulation, and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing, products and services.

General

Heritage Financial Group (“the Company”) is the parent holding company of HeritageBank of the South (“the Bank”). The Company is in a mutual holding company structure and 76% of its outstanding common stock is owned by Heritage, MHC (“MHC”), a federal mutual holding company.

The principal business of the Company is operating our wholly owned subsidiary, the Bank. Our results of operations depend primarily on our net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets, consisting primarily of loans and investments, and the interest we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, consisting of savings and checking accounts, money market accounts, time deposits, federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings. Our results of operations also are affected by our provisions for loan losses, noninterest income and noninterest expense. Noninterest income consists primarily of service charges on deposit accounts, mortgage origination fees, transaction fees, bank-owned life insurance, and commissions from investment services. Noninterest expense consists primarily of salaries and employee benefits, occupancy, equipment and data processing, advertising, professional fees and other costs. Our results of operations also may be affected significantly by general and local economic and competitive conditions, changes in market interest rates, governmental policies and actions of regulatory authorities.

We originally were chartered as a federal credit union in 1955. In 1998, we became a community chartered credit union. We accepted deposits and made loans to members who lived, worked or worshiped in the approved counties for the credit union charter. In 2001, we converted to a mutual thrift charter in order to better serve our customers and communities through a broader lending ability and an expanded customer base beyond the field of membership permitted for our credit union. The mutual holding company structure was established in 2002, and we converted from a thrift charter to a state savings bank charter in 2005.

The Company completed an initial public stock offering on June 29, 2005. We sold 3,372,375 shares of common stock in that offering for $10.00 per share. The Company's employee stock ownership plan (the "ESOP") purchased 440,700 shares with the proceeds of a loan from the Company. The Company received net proceeds of $32.4 million in the public offering, 50% of which was contributed to the Bank and $4.4 million of which was loaned to the ESOP for its purchase of shares in the offering. The Company also issued an additional 7,867,875 shares of common stock to MHC, so that MHC would own 70% of the outstanding common stock at the close of the offering.

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that was enacted on July 21, 2010, provides, among other things, for new restrictions and an expanded framework of regulatory oversight for financial institutions and their holding companies, including Heritage Financial Group, Inc. and HeritageBank of the South. In addition, beginning in 2011, all financial institution holding companies, including Heritage Financial Group, Inc., will be regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, including imposing federal capital requirements similar to those imposed by Georgia and may result in additional restrictions on investments and other holding company activities. The law also creates a new consumer financial protection bureau that will have the authority to promulgate rules intended to prot ect consumers in the financial products and services market. The creation of this independent bureau could result in new regulatory requirements and raise the cost of regulatory compliance. In addition, new regulations mandated by the law could require changes in regulatory capital requirements, loan loss provisioning practices, and compensation practices and require holding companies to serve as a source of strength for their financial institution subsidiaries. Effective July 21, 2011, financial institutions may pay interest on demand deposits, which could increase our interest expense. The law also removed certain barriers to interstate branching. In the past, interstate branching was often accomplished by the purchase of an existing bank in a target state, as HeritageBank of the South did when it entered Florida in 2006. This $1.0 million has been carried on our books as an indefinite-lived intangible asset. Because of the elimination of the branching barrier, we took a one-time, noncash pre-tax charge of $1.0 million in the third quarter of 2010 to write-off this intangible asset. On an after-tax basis, this reduced 2010 net income by approximately $709,000. This write-off had no effect on HFG’s or HeritageBank of the South’s regulatory capital or tangible capital, because those measures already exclude all intangible assets. We cannot determine the full impact of the new law on our business and operations at this time.

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

On March 17, 2010, the Company adopted a plan to reorganize from a two-tier mutual holding company to a full stock holding company and will undertake a “second-step” offering of shares of the holding company’s common stock. The conversion and offering is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2010, subject to regulatory, stockholder and depositor approvals. As part of the reorganization, HeritageBank of the South will become a wholly owned subsidiary of a to-be-formed stock corporation, Heritage Financial Group, Inc. Shares of the common stock of the Company, other than those held by Heritage, MHC, will be converted into shares of common stock in Heritage Financial Group, Inc., using an exchange ratio designed to preserve current percentage ownership interests. Shares owned by Heritage, MHC will be retired, and new shares of Heritage Financial Group, Inc. representing that ownership will be offered and sold to the Bank’s eligible depositors, the Bank’s tax-qualified employee benefit plans and members of the general public as set forth in the Plan of Conversion and Reorganization of Heritage, MHC.

Evolution of Business Strategy

Our current business strategy is to operate a well-capitalized and profitable commercial and retail financial institution dedicated to serving the needs of our customers. We strive to be the primary financial institution in the market areas we serve. We offer a broad range of products and services, while stressing personalized and efficient customer service and convenient access to these products and services. We intend to continue to operate as a commercial and consumer lender. We have structured operations around a branch system that is staffed with knowledgeable and well-trained employees. Subject to capital requirements and our ability to grow in a reasonable and prudent manner, we may open additional branches as opportunities arise. In addition to our branch system, we continue to expand electronic services for our customers. We attempt to differentiate ourselves from our competitors by providing a higher level of customer service.

We continue to implement our business strategy, as set forth in our Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2010. A critical component of this strategy includes increasing our non-consumer based lending and our ability to continue to grow our commercial and small business loan portfolios. As of September 30, 2010, our non-consumer based lending represented approximately $224.7 million, or 54.27% of our total loan portfolio.

Another key component of our business strategy is the expansion of our operations outside of the Southwest Georgia market. On August 8, 2006, we commenced operating a branch in Ocala, Florida. On December 4, 2009, we acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed substantially all of the liabilities of The Tattnall Bank in Reidsville and Collins, Georgia, through an FDIC-assisted transaction. On December 31, 2009, we acquired the Lake City, Florida branch of Atlantic Coast Bank. On May 24, 2010, we acquired five Park Avenue Bank branches located in the Southeast Georgia markets of Statesboro (2), Hazlehurst and Baxley, and the Southwest Georgia market of Adel.

On June 7, 2010, we announced our entry into the Valdosta, Georgia market with the opening of a loan production office and the hiring of three local bankers. Subsequently, we obtained regulatory approval for a full service branch, and on July 5, 2010, we opened a branch office in a leased facility in Valdosta. In 2011, we expect to open a larger branch office in Valdosta.

Operating branches outside of the Southwest Georgia market subjects us to additional risk factors. These risk factors include, but are not limited to the following: management of employees from a distance, lack of knowledge of the local market, additional credit risks, logistical operational issues, and time constraints of management. These risk factors, as well as others we have not identified, may affect our ability to successfully operate outside of our current market area.

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Critical Accounting Policies

We have not changed any of our critical accounting policies since those disclosed in our Form 10-K, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 4, 2010. Those accounting policies relate to the judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements in the calculation of the allowance for loan losses, the accounting for impaired loans and the provision for income taxes.

Off Balance Sheet Liabilities

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. We use the same credit policies in making these commitments as we do for on-balance sheet instruments. A summary of the Company's commitments as of September 30, 2010, is as follows:

	(In thousands)

Commitments to extend credit	$	51,055
Financial stand-by letters of credit		794
	$	51,849

Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009

Total assets increased by $111.4 million or 19.5% to $683.3 million at September 30, 2010, from $572.0 million at December 31, 2009. Cash and due from banks increased $18.3 million or 123% to $33.3 million at September 30, 2010 from $14.9 million at December 31, 2009. Total interest-earning assets increased $89.1 million or 17.5% to $598.4 million at September 30, 2010, from $509.2 million at December 31, 2009. Loans increased $79.8 million, securities available for sale increased $41.3 million while interest-bearing deposits in banks decreased $32.7 million.

The increase in cash and due from banks was primarily a result of maintaining a higher compensating balance in our primary correspondent account. This increase in our compensating balance allowed us to utilize our excess liquidity position to offset various correspondent fees, which was more advantageous than maintaining a portion of the excess balance at the prevailing overnight federal funds rate. The increase in loans was primarily due to our acquisition of five branches, including $51.8 million in loans, from The Park Avenue Bank during the second quarter. The increase in securities available for sale was due to purchases of securities we made to utilize the net cash of $39.4 million received from this acquisition. These purchases were U.S. Government agency securities and U.S. governm ent agency mortgage-backed securities. The decrease in interest-bearing deposits in banks was due to the maturity of certificates of deposit we held with other financial institutions which were not reinvested at maturity. We expect to maintain higher balances in cash and due from banks, as well as federal funds sold due to the addition of the deposit accounts we acquired from The Park Avenue Bank. During the quarter, we added $699,500 in loans held for sale. This consists of mortgage loans generated to be sold to investors. We generally originate and fund these loans in our name with a pre-approval to sell to the investor. We typically hold these loans for up to thirty days and earn the stated rate on the note until they are purchased by the investor.

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

We continue to maintain excess liquidity for three purposes. First, we believe it is prudent to maintain higher liquidity during uncertain economic times. Second, we believe this excess liquidity gives us additional flexibility in our expansion strategy. Third, we believe this excess liquidity will provide us flexibility for funding loans or other investments if we see a dramatic rise in interest rates. Maintaining excess liquidity does negatively impact net interest margin in the short term, however, we feel the benefits of maintaining excess liquidity outweighs the cost to net interest margin. We expect to continue to maintain excess liquidity during the remainder of 2010.

Premises and equipment increased $4.8 million or 31.0% at September 30, 2010, of which $1.2 million was due to our purchase of branches in Reidsville and Collins from the FDIC during the first quarter of 2010 and approximately $3.4 million related to our acquisition of the five branches from The Park Avenue Bank. The acquisition of The Park Avenue Bank branches included land of $1.4 million, buildings of $1.9 million and furniture and equipment $149,000. In addition, we expect to begin construction on a new branch in Lee County, Georgia during the second half of 2010 at an approximate cost of $2.5 million. We are currently leasing our facility in Valdosta, Georgia. We expect to purchase land and begin building a branch in this market in 2011. We have not determined the cost at this ti me.

The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans decreased to 1.6% at September 30, 2010, compared to 1.8% at December 31, 2009 and 2.7% at September 30, 2009. Excluding purchased loans, the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 2.0% at September 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009.

Foreclosed assets increased from $1.8 million at December 31, 2009, to $2.8 million at September 30, 2010. The primary reason for the increase was the addition of a $1.9 million undeveloped commercial property in the Atlanta metropolitan market in the first quarter of 2010. This property was foreclosed in March 2010 and was under a contract for sale; however, the buyer did not perform as agreed in the contract. We are currently marketing this property for sale. The remainder of our foreclosed assets consists of various properties, primarily located in southwest Georgia, with no single property having a book value over $400,000. All of these properties are being marketed actively for disposition. During the first nine months of 2010, we had gross proceeds on sales of OREO pr operty of approximately $2.6 million and recorded net gains of $343,000 on those sales.

Other assets decreased $1.9 million or 15.4% during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This decrease was due primarily to a decrease in receivables from the FDIC related to the purchase of the Reidsville and Collins branches in the FDIC-assisted transaction during the first quarter of 2010.

Total liabilities increased $109.1 million or 21.3% to $620.2 million at September 30, 2010 compared with $511.1 million at December 31, 2009. Total deposits increased $108.8 million of which approximately $97.1million was acquired through our acquisition of five branches in May 2010. Approximately $75.6 million of these acquired deposits were checking and money market accounts, while approximately $21.5 million were certificates of deposit that matured within 45 days of the acquisition of the branches. The remainder of the certificates of deposit of these branches remained with The Park Avenue Bank after the acquisition. Because The Park Avenue Bank will not be operating branches in these markets, we expect some of those customers may migrate to us as their certificates of deposit mature, which we believe may add approximately $50.0 million of the certificates of deposit we did not assume in the branch acquisition to our deposit base in these markets over the next year. The total amount of other borrowings remained level at $42.5 million during the first nine months of 2010. Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase increased by $2.2 million or 6.9% due to the acquisition of commercial customers and their related repurchase agreements in the acquisition of The Park Avenue Bank branches.

Total equity increased $2.3 million to $63.1 million at September 30, 2010, compared with $60.8 million at December 31, 2009. Net income of $484,000 for the first nine months of 2010, stock based compensation of $605,000, the allocation of $345,000 in ESOP shares as well as other comprehensive income of $1.5 million increased equity, while dividends of $714,000 decreased equity.

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three and Nine Month Periods Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

General. During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded net 1oss of $443,000, compared to $467,000 in net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Higher net interest income, higher noninterest income and a lower provision expense offset higher noninterest income.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded net income of $484,000 compared to $82,000 in net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Higher net interest income, lower provision expense and an increase in noninterest income was partially offset by higher noninterest expense.

Interest Income. Total interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2010, increased $1.7 million or 30.1% to $7.4 million, compared to $5.7 million during the third quarter of 2009. The increase was due to an increase in average interest-earning assets of $174.5 million during the 2010 quarter to $593.1 million compared with $418.6 million during the 2009 quarter. The increase in average interest-earning assets was primarily due to our acquisition activity during the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first half of 2010. The increase in average interest-earning assets was partially offset by a decrease of 52 basis points in yield on average-earning assets to 5.03% in the 2010 quarter compared with 5.55% in the 2009 quarter. 60;The decrease in yield was due to a lower yield on investment securities. We expect this trend to continue as long term interest rates remain low.

Total interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, increased $3.1 million or 17.8% to $20.7 million, compared to $17.6 million during the first nine months of 2009. The increase was due to an increase in average interest-earning assets of $110.0 million during the 2010 period to $546.8 million compared with $436.8 million during the 2009 period. This increase in average interest-earning assets was due primarily to our acquisition activity during the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first half of 2010. The increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets was partially offset by a 36 basis points decrease in yield on average interest-earning assets to 5.16% during the first nine months of 2010 compared with a yield of 5.52% earned during the same period in 2009. ;The decrease in yield was due to a lower yield on investment securities. We expect the yield on our interest-earning assets to continue to decrease slightly during the remainder of 2010 as we continue to see the effects of the rate cuts by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System from 2007 and 2008 as our loans and investment securities mature and reprice. In addition, as we carry excess liquidity on our balance sheet, primarily from our branch and FDIC-assisted acquisitions, we will see decreases in our overall yield on average interest-earning assets.

Interest Expense. Total interest expense increased $311,000 or 15.7% to $2.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, compared to $2.0 million during the same period in 2009. The increase was due to an increase in average interest-earning assets of $177.1 million during the 2010 period to $557.9 million compared with $380.8 million during the 2009 period. This increase in average interest-earning assets was due primarily to our acquisition activity during the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first half of 2010. The increase in average interest-earning assets was partially offset by a 44 basis points decrease in yield on average interest-bearing liabilities to 1.63% during the third quarter of 2010 compared with 2.06% during the third quarter of 2009.

Total interest expense decreased $392,000 or 5.7% to $6.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to $6.9 million during the same period in 2009. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 60 basis points to 1.70% during the first nine months of 2010 compared with 2.30% during the same period in 2009. This decrease in costs was partially offset by an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities during the first nine months of 2010 to $511.8 million, an increase of $111.4 million compared to $400.4 million during the first nine months of 2009. We experienced significant decreases in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities during 2009 and the first six months of 2010. This decrease began to flatten during the third quarter 2010. We expect these decreases to continue to slow during the remainder of 2010 as we near the end of the current rate cycle.

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the third quarter of 2010 increased $1.4 million or 37.7% to $5.1 million compared with $3.7 million for the third quarter of 2009. The net interest spread decreased 9 basis points to 3.40% for the third quarter of 2010 compared to 3.49% for the third quarter of 2009. The net interest margin decreased 18 basis points to 3.50% for the third quarter of 2010 compared to 3.68% for the third quarter of 2009.

Net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased $3.5 million or 33.0% to $14.2 million from $10.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The net interest spread increased 24 basis points for the first nine months of 2010 to 3.46% compared to 3.22% during the same period in 2009. The net interest margin increased 16 basis points to 3.57% for the first nine months of 2010 compared to 3.41% during the same period in 2009.

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the total dollar amount of interest income from average interest-earning assets and the resultant yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates. Yields on tax-exempt obligations have been computed on a tax equivalent basis. Nonaccruing loans have been included in the table as loans carrying a zero yield.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2010								2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)
	Average Outstanding Balance			Interest Earned/ Paid		Yield/ Rate			Average Outstanding Balance			Interest Earned/ Paid		Yield/ Rate
Interest-Earning Assets:
Loans	$	397,421		$	6,136		6.13	%	$	296,800		$	4,600		6.16	%
Mortgage Loans held for sale		596			6		4.35			-			-
Taxable investment securities		137,658			1,006		2.92			79,437			781		3.93
Tax exempt investment securities		21,123			212		6.08			29,900			296		6.01
Federal funds sold		17,320			11		0.26			11,746			7		0.26
Interest bearing deposits with banks		19,003			25		0.52			751			1		0.40
Total interest-earning Assets		593,121			7,396		5.03			418,634			5,685		5.55

Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Interest bearing demand		104,872			248		0.94			49,071			125		1.01
Savings and money market		201,108			382		0.75			124,825			384		1.22
Retail time deposits		164,265			940		2.27			112,359			838		2.96
Wholesale time deposits		10,540			61		2.29			16,153			132		3.26
Borrowings		77,107			659		3.39			78,403			500		2.53
Total interest-bearing liabilities		557,892			2,290		1.63			380,811			1,979		2.06

Net interest income				$	5,106							$	3,706
Net interest rate spread							3.40	%							3.49	%
Net earning assets	$	35,229							$	37,823
Net interest margin							3.50	%							3.68	%


Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		1.06	X							1.10	X

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

	Nine Months Ended September 30
	2010		2009
	(Dollars in Thousands)

	Average Outstanding Balance			Interest Earned/ Paid		Yield/ Rate			Average Outstanding Balance			Interest Earned/ Paid		Yield/ Rate
Interest-Earning Assets:
Loans	$	366,091		$	17,218		6.30	%	$	297,289		$	13,722		6.18	%
Mortgage Loans held for sale		209			7		4.39			-			-		-
Taxable investment securities		104,700			2,572		3.28			87,940			2,921		4.43
Tax exempt investment securities		25,140			749		6.02			30,040			882		5.93
Federal funds sold		19,569			38		0.26			20,934			40		0.25
Interest bearing deposits with banks		31,130			115		0.49			585			1		0.27
Total interest-earning Assets		546,839			20,699		5.16			439,788			17,566		5.52

Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Interest bearing demand		86,558			654		1.01			49,291			385		1.04
Savings and money market		179,220			986		0.74			116,532			1,118		1.28
Retail time deposits		158,010			2,821		2.39			124,251			3,039		3.27
Wholesale time deposits		11,812			207		2.34			19,337			507		3.51
Borrowings		76,218			1,820		2.51			91,041			1,830		2.69
Total interest-bearing liabilities		511,818			6,488		1.70			400,452			6,879		2.30

Net interest income				$	14,211							$	10,687
Net interest rate spread							3.46	%							3.22	%
Net earning assets	$	35,021							$	39,336
Net interest margin							3.57	%							3.41	%

Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		1.07	X							1.10	X

The following schedule presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. It distinguishes between the changes related to outstanding balances and that due to the changes in interest rates. The change in interest attributable to rate has been determined by applying the change in rate between years to average balances outstanding in the later year. The change in interest due to volume has been determined by applying the rate from the earlier year to the change in average balances outstanding between years. Changes that are not solely due to volume have been consistently attributed to rate.

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2010 vs. 2009
	Increase (Decrease)						Total
	Due to						Increase
	Volume			Rate			(Decrease)
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	1,446		$	90		$	1,536
Loans held for sale		6			-			6
Taxable investment securities		386			(161	)		225
Tax exempt investment securities		(91	)		7			(84	)
Federal funds sold		4			-			4
Interest bearing deposits with banks		24			-			24
Total interest-earning assets	$	1,775		$	(64	)		1,711

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing demand	$	132		$	(9	)		123
Savings and money market		260			(262	)		(2	)
Retail time deposits		331			(229	)		102
Wholesale time deposits		(43	)		(28	)		(71	)
Borrowings		7			152			159
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	687		$	(376	)		311

Net interest income							$	1,400

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010 vs. 2009
	Increase (Decrease)						Total
	Due to						Increase
	Volume			Rate			(Decrease)
	(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	3,064		$	432		$	3,496
Loans held for sale		7			-			7
Taxable investment securities		368			(717	)		(349	)
Tax exempt investment securities		(159	)		26			(133	)
Federal funds sold		(3	)		1			(2	)
Interest bearing deposits with banks		112			2			114
Total interest-earning assets	$	3,389		$	(256	)		3,133

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing demand	$	280		$	(11	)		269
Savings and money market		760			(892	)		(132	)
Retail time deposits		716			(934	)		(218	)
Wholesale time deposits		(164	)		(136	)		(300	)
Borrowings		(176	)		166			(10	)
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	1,416		$	(1,807	)		(391	)

Net interest income							$	3,524

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Provision for Loan Losses. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we recorded a $950,000 provision for loan losses, which was a decrease compared to the $2.5 million provision recorded during the same period in 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded a $2.1 million provision for loan losses, which was a decrease compared to the $3.8 million provision recorded during the same period in 2009.

The decrease for the current quarter and year to date was due to a decrease in expected losses on problem loans compared to the same period last year. The reason for the decrease in expected losses is due to the type of loans included in non-performing loans. At September 30, 2009, we had a significant amount of land loans classified as non-performing, for which we expected significant losses. At September 30, 2010, the non-performing loan portfolio contains more single family residential rental properties and loans we expect to restructure, for which we expect much lower levels of losses. Non-performing loans increased to $12.2 million at September 30, 2010 from $8.5 million at December 31, 2009, but was down from$13.0 million at September 30, 2009.

The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans decreased to 1.58% at September 30, 2010, compared to 1.81% at December 31, 2009 and 2.68% at September 30, 2009. Excluding purchased loans, the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.98% at September 30, 2010, compared to 2.03% at December 31, 2009 and 2.68% at September 30, 2009.

The following table sets forth asset quality information for the periods indicated:

	As of and for the quarter ended
	9/30/10			6/30/10			12/31/09			9/30/09
	(Dollars in thousands)
Total Portfolio
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		1.58	%		1.55	%		1.81	%		2.68	%
Allowance for loan losses to average loans		1.64	%		1.66	%		1.98	%		2.70	%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans		53.56	%		80.21	%		71.61	%		61.80	%
Loan – 30 – 89 days past due & still accruing	$	899		$	2,498		$	3,247		$	1,277
Nonaccrual loans	$	12,199		$	7,514		$	8,463		$	12,990
Loans – 90 days past due & still accruing	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Total non-performing loans	$	12,199		$	7,514		$	8,463		$	12,990
OREO and repossessed assets	$	2,787		$	3,019		$	1,795		$	898
Total non-performing assets	$	14,986		$	10,533		$	9,526		$	13,888
Non-performing loans to total loans		2.95	%		1.93	%		2.53	%		4.34	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		2.20	%		1.59	%		1.79	%		2.97	%
Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized)		0.45	%		0.48	%		7.42	%		0.29	%
Net charge-offs	$	443		$	439		$	5,667		$	219

Portfolio excluding purchased loans
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		1.98	%		1.98	%		2.03	%		2.68	%
Allowance for loan losses to average loans		2.09	%		2.00	%		2.06	%		2.70	%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans		60.20	%		80.90	%		83.74	%		61.80	%
Loan – 30 – 89 days past due & still accruing	$	641		$	369		$	1,826		$	1,277
Nonaccrual loans	$	10,854		$	7,450		$	7,237		$	12,990
Loans – 90 days past due & still accruing	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-
Total non-performing loans	$	10,854		$	7,450		$	7,237		$	12,990
OREO and repossessed assets	$	2,551		$	2,782		$	1,190		$	898
Total non-performing assets	$	13,405		$	10,232		$	8,427		$	13,888
Non-performing loans to total loans		3.29	%		2.45	%		2.42	%		4.34	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		1.97	%		1.54	%		1.47	%		2.97	%
Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized)		0.57	%		0.58	%		7.70	%		0.29	%
Net charge-offs	$	443		$	439		$	5,667		$	219

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

The following table sets forth asset quality information for the periods indicated:

	As of and for the nine months ended
	9/30/10			9/30/09
	(Dollars in thousands)
Total Portfolio
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		1.58	%		2.68	%
Allowance for loan losses to average loans		1.78	%		2.70	%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans		53.56	%		61.80	%
Loan – 30 – 89 days past due & still accruing	$	899		$	1,277
Nonaccrual loans	$	12,199		$	12,990
Loans – 90 days past due & still accruing	$	-		$	-
Total non-performing loans	$	12,199		$	12,990
OREO and repossessed assets	$	2,787		$	898
Total non-performing assets	$	14,986		$	$13,888
Non-performing loans to total loans		2.95	%		4.34	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		2.20	%		2.97	%
Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized)		0.59	%		0.32	%
Net charge-offs	$	1,626		$	723

Portfolio excluding purchased loans
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		1.98	%		2.68	%
Allowance for loan losses to average loans		2.09	%		2.70	%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans		60.20	%		61.80	%
Loan – 30 – 89 days past due & still accruing	$	641		$	1,277
Nonaccrual loans	$	10,854		$	12,990
Loans – 90 days past due & still accruing	$	-		$	-
Total non-performing loans	$	10,854		$	12,990
OREO and repossessed assets	$	2,551		$	898
Total non-performing assets	$	13,405		$	13,888
Non-performing loans to total loans		3.29	%		4.34	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		1.97	%		2.97	%
Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized)		0.72	%		0.32	%
Net charge-offs	$	1,626		$	723

At September 30, 2010, our largest non-performing loans are $1.7 million secured by 20.01 acres of land in Ocala, Florida and $1.7 million secured by multiple single family residential rental properties located in Southwest Georgia. Our next largest non-performing loan at that date was $1.4 million secured by an owner-occupied retail building in Ocala, Florida. Our fourth largest non-performing loan at that date was $1.3 million, secured by apartments located in Southwest Georgia. The allowance for loans loss related to these loans totaled $814,000 or 13.3% of their outstanding balance at September 30, 2010. In addition to the nonperforming loans previously mentioned, nonperforming loans as of September 30, 2010 consisted of a $970,000, secured by commercial real estate in Ocala, Florida and a $538,000 multiple resid ential properties located in Southwest Georgia. The remainder of our non-performing loans consists of various consumer and commercial loans, none exceeding $500,000. Current appraisals on real estate loans, expected cost of potential foreclosure or other disposition, and other potential losses on these loans are considered in our analysis of the allowance for loan losses.

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

Our internally criticized (watch list) and classified assets totaled $39.6 million at September 30, 2010, compared to $35.8 million at December 31, 2009 and $33.8 million at September 30, 2009. This includes loans with respect to which known information about the possible credit problems of the borrowers have caused management to have doubts as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with present loan repayment terms and which may result in the future inclusion of such items in the non-performing asset categories. These balances include the aforementioned nonperforming loans, other real estate, and repossessed assets. These loans have been considered in management's determination of the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses. Our internal loan review processes strive to identify weaknesses in loans prior to perf ormance issues. However, our processes do not always provide sufficient time to work out plans with borrowers that would avoid foreclosure and/or losses.

We establish provisions for loan losses, which are charged to operations, at a level we believe will reflect probable credit losses based on historical loss trends and an evaluation of specific credits in the loan portfolio. In evaluating the level of the allowance for loan losses, we consider the types of loans and the amount of loans in the loan portfolio, historical loss experience, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, prevailing economic conditions, and past due status and trends.

We assess the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis and make provisions for loan losses as necessary in order to maintain the proper level of allowance. While we use available information to recognize losses on loans, future loan loss provisions may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the allowance for loan losses and may require us to recognize additional provisions based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that represents management's best estimate of inherent losses in the loan portfolio, and such losses were both probable and reasonably estimable. The level of the allowance is based on estimates and the ultimate losses may vary from the estimates.

Noninterest Income. Noninterest income, excluding securities transactions, increased $633,000, or 35.7%, from $1.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, and $922,000, or 18.1%, from $5.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $6.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

A summary of noninterest income, excluding securities transactions, follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			$ Chg			% Chg

Service charges on deposit accounts	$	1,112,390		$	950,893		$	161,497			17.0	%
Other service charges, commissions and fees		642,817			338,490			304,327			89.9	%
Brokerage fees		253,572			251,854			1,718			0.7	%
Mortgage origination fees		227,052			66,364			160,688			242.1	%
Bank owned life insurance		152,888			155,285			(2,397	)		-1.5	%
Other		18,834			11,575			7,259			62.7	%
Total noninterest income	$	2,407,553		$	1,774,461		$	633,092			35.7	%
Noninterest income as a percentage of average assets (annualized)		1.42	%		1.50	%

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			$ Chg			% Chg

Service charges on deposit accounts	$	2,918,408		$	2,595,376		$	323,032			12.4	%
Other service charges, commissions and fees		1,511,282			1,060,600			450,682			42.5	%
Brokerage fees		732,626			662,177			70,449			10.6	%
Mortgage origination fees		336,671			275,544			61,127			22.2	%
Bank owned life insurance		458,879			464,767			(5,888	)		-1.3	%
Other		56,856			33,870			22,986			67.9	%
Total noninterest income	$	6,014,722		$	5,092,334		$	922,388			18.1	%
Noninterest income as a percentage of average assets (annualized)		1.29	%		1.39	%

There was an increase in fee income due to the accounts obtained in our acquisition of The Park Avenue Bank branches. The increase in both periods was primarily due to an increase in overdraft fees and an increase in ATM and debit card income. Recent regulatory changes to the offering of overdraft privileges on ATM and debit cards may cause significant decreases in our overdraft fees. At this time, we are unable to accurately estimate the effect this legislation, and other potential legislation, may have on our overdraft income. We are currently analyzing our options to replace this income stream if it is significantly affected by legislation or by a significant change in consumer behavior. These options will likely result in a major change in the fees we charge to our deposit customers.

Mortgage origination fees increased in the third quarter 2010 as a result of the addition of mortgage origination in our Statesboro office which was added in May 2010. In addition, we have seen increased refinance activity due to a decrease in long term interest rates.

Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased $3.3 million, or 74.8%, from $4.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $7.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, and $5.2 million, or 39.1%, from $13.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $18.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

A summary of noninterest expense follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			$ Chg			% Chg

Salaries and employee benefits	$	3,445,912		$	2,295,513		$	1,150,399			50.1	%
Equipment		303,837			221,077			82,760			37.4	%
Occupancy		423,730			312,000			111,730			35.8	%
Advertising and marketing		166,051			146,962			19,089			13.0	%
Legal and accounting		112,077			117,868			(5,791	)		-4.9	%
Consulting & other professional fees		71,106			69,669			1,437			2.1	%
Directors fees and retirement		141,711			154,608			(12,897	)		-8.3	%
Telecommunications		131,765			52,861			78,904			149.3	%
Supplies		97,787			46,384			51,403			110.8	%
Data processing fees		604,495			431,608			172,887			40.1	%
Loss on sale and write-downs of other real estate owned		(30	)		80,000			(80,030	)		-100.0	%
Foreclosed asset and collection expenses		181,295			78,561			102,734			130.8	%
FDIC insurance and other regulatory fees		283,262			136,192			147,070			108.0	%
Impairment loss on intangible asset		1,000,000			-			1,000,000			100.0	%
Other operating		816,187			306,871			509,316			166.0	%
Total noninterest expenses	$	7,779,185		$	4,450,174		$	3,329,011			74.8	%
Noninterest expenses as a percentage of average assets (annualized)		4.01	%		3.78	%

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			$ Chg			% Chg

Salaries and employee benefits	$	8,984,760		$	6,719,869		$	2,264,891			33.7	%
Equipment		810,350			760,243			50,107			6.6	%
Occupancy		1,059,391			901,263			158,128			17.5	%
Advertising and marketing		410,413			345,191			65,222			18.9	%
Legal and accounting		439,720			390,526			49,194			12.6	%
Consulting & other professional fees		207,821			220,078			(14,257	)		-6.4	%
Directors fees and retirement		419,133			460,824			(41,691	)		-9.0	%
Telecommunications		304,497			169,189			135,308			80.0	%
Supplies		250,993			130,687			120,306			92.1	%
Data processing fees		1,596,089			1,144,789			451,300			39.4	%
(Gain) Loss on sale and write-downs of other real estate owned		(343,464	)		384,068			(727,532	)		-189.4	%
Foreclosed asset and collection expenses		779,002			171,789			607,213			353.5	%
FDIC insurance and other regulatory fees		681,932			501,078			180,854			36.1	%
Impairment loss on intangible asset		1,000,000			-			1,000,000			100.0	%
Other operating		1,908,311			1,004,909			903,402			89.9	%
Total noninterest expenses	$	18,508,948		$	13,306,503		$	5,202,445			39.1	%
Noninterest expenses as a percentage of average assets (annualized)		3.97	%		3.62	%

The increase in both periods was primarily due to increases in salaries and employee benefits resulting from increases in the number of FTE’s primarily related to our acquisition activity, along with an increase in foreclosed asset and collection expenses. In addition, we incurred additional occupancy expenses and initial start up cost related to the opening of a de novo branch in Valdosta in July of 2010.

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

During 2010, we recorded gains on the sale of other real estate owned, which partially offset the increases in noninterest expenses. These gains related to the disposition of several properties we acquired in our FDIC-assisted acquisition.

In September 2010, we converted the core operating system of the two branches acquired through our December 2009 FDIC assisted transaction, to the core operating system currently used by the Company. We incurred approximately $210,000 in expenses related to this conversion in the third quarter 2010.

In July 2010, we recorded a one-time, noncash pre-tax charge of $1,000,000 to write-off an intangible asset related to the Company's Florida bank charter that it purchased in 2007, which became impaired as a result of the recent passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Foreclosed asset and collection expenses increased, primarily due to expenses associated with our FDIC-acquired portfolio. Initially, we recorded a contingent liability for these expenses at the time of acquisition and recorded expenses incurred against this liability. However, during the quarter ended June 30, 2010, we determined we should expense these items as they are incurred. The amount we originally set up as a contingent liability for these expenses has now been used to further reduce the fair market value of the loans acquired in this acquisition. We expect to incur approximately $1.8 million in expenses related to these loans over the next five years.

Other operating expenses also increased significantly during both periods, primarily due to the amortization of core deposit intangibles associated with our acquisition activity in the fourth quarter of 2009 and second quarter of 2010. In addition, we recorded conversion expenses of $267,000 in the second quarter of 2010 related to our acquisition and core data processing system conversion of the PAB branches.

Income Tax Expense. For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we recorded a tax benefit of $702,000 compared to income tax benefit of $533,000 during the same period in 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded tax benefit of $636,000 compared to a tax benefit of $574,000 during the first nine months of 2009. For the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, our nontaxable income exceeded total net income, and thus, a tax benefit was recorded.

Liquidity

We are required to have enough cash and investments that qualify as liquid assets in order to maintain sufficient liquidity to ensure a safe and sound operation. Liquidity may increase or decrease depending upon the availability of funds and comparative yields on investments in relation to the return on loans. Historically, we have maintained liquid assets above levels believed to be adequate to meet the requirements of normal operations, including potential deposit outflows. Cash flow projections are regularly reviewed and updated to assure that adequate liquidity is maintained.

Liquidity management involves the matching of cash flow requirements of customers, who may be either depositors desiring to withdraw funds or borrowers needing assurance that sufficient funds will be available to meet their credit needs and the ability of the Company to manage those requirements. The Company strives to maintain an adequate liquidity position by managing the balances and maturities of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities so that the balance it has in short-term investments at any given time will adequately cover any reasonably anticipated immediate need for funds. Additionally, the Bank maintains relationships with correspondent banks, which could provide funds on short-term notice if needed. Our liquidity, represented by cash and cash equivalents, is a product of our op erating, investing and financing activities. Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of business management. Excess liquidity is generally invested in short-term investments, such as overnight deposits and federal funds. On a longer term basis, we maintain a strategy of investing in various lending products and investment securities, including mortgage-backed securities.

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

The Company is a separate legal entity from HeritageBank of the South and must provide for its own liquidity, as will Heritage Financial Group, Inc. after the conversion. In addition to its operating expenses, the Company is responsible for paying any dividends declared to its shareholders, and interest and principal on outstanding debt. The Company has also repurchased shares of its common stock. The Company’s primary source of funds consists of the net proceeds retained by the Company from its initial public offering in 2005 and dividends from HeritageBank of the South. There are regulatory restrictions on the ability of HeritageBank of the South to pay dividends. At September 30, 2010, HFG (on an unconsolidated basis) had $3.9 million in cash, federal funds sold, interest-bea ring deposits and investments in banks generally available for its cash needs.

HeritageBank of the South’s primary sources of funds are deposits, amortization, prepayments and maturities of outstanding loans and mortgage-backed securities, maturities of investment securities and other short-term investments and funds provided by operations. While scheduled payments from the amortization of loans and maturing short-term investments are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. In addition, HeritageBank of the South invests excess funds in short-term interest-earning assets, which provide liquidity to meet lending requirements. HeritageBank of the South also generates cash through borrowings, primarily from Federal Home Loan Bank advances, to leverage its capit al base, provide funds for its lending and investment activities and enhance its interest rate risk management.

HeritageBank of the South uses its sources of funds primarily to meet its ongoing commitments, pay maturing deposits, fund withdrawals and fund loan commitments. It is management’s policy to manage deposit rates that are competitive with other local financial institutions, based on our needs and potential uses of the funds. Based on this management strategy, we believe that a majority of maturing deposits will remain with HeritageBank of the South. In addition, HeritageBank of the South had the ability, at September 30, 2010, to borrow an additional $31.8 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and $20.0 million from other lenders as a funding source to meet commitments and for liquidity purposes.

On December 30, 2009, the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund restoration plan required banks to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012. Under the plan, which applies to all insured financial institutions except those with liquidity problems, insured financial institutions were assessed through 2010 according to the risk-based premium schedule adopted earlier this year. However, beginning January 1, 2011, the base rate increases by three basis points. We had the necessary liquidity to accommodate this prepayment of premiums and did not experience any material impact on its liquidity as a result of this action.

In March 2008, we purchased a lot in the Lee County Georgia market for $743,000 for potential future expansion. We have begun construction of a branch at that location, scheduled for completion in 2011, at an estimated cost of $2.5 million.

The liquidity of the Company is monitored continuously by the Company’s Board-authorized Asset Liability Management Committee and on a periodic basis by state and federal regulatory authorities. As determined under guidelines established by these regulatory authorities, the Company’s and the Bank’s liquidity ratios at September 30, 2010, were considered satisfactory. At that date, the Bank’s short-term investments were adequate to cover any reasonably immediate need for funds. The Company is aware of no events or trends likely to result in a negative material change in liquidity.

Index

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

The consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, detail cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net cash provided by operating activities was $3.0 million while investing activities provided $1.9 million and financing activities provided $13.5 million resulting in a net increase in cash during the nine month period of $18.4 million.

Cash flow provided by investing activities included $40.5 million in proceeds from acquisition activity partially offset by net securities transactions which utilized $38.2 million of cash. The increase in cash flow provided by financing activities related to the increase in deposits of $11.9 million which primarily related to increased jumbo certificates and money market deposit accounts during the third quarter 2010.

Capital Resources

The Company’s and the Bank’s regulatory capital levels exceed the minimums required by state and federal authorities. The following table reflects the Company’s and the Bank’s compliance at September 30, 2010, with regulatory capital requirements. These calculations are based on total risk weighted assets of $440.0 million consolidated and $433.7 million for HeritageBank of the South as of September 30, 2010, and average total assets of $676.5 million consolidated and $673.3 million for HeritageBank of the South for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					Minimum Required to Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in thousands)

Total Capital to Risk Weighted Assets
Heritage Financial Group Consolidated	$	64,572		14.7	%	$	35,204		8.0	%		-		-
HeritageBank of the South	$	57,552		13.3	%	$	34,694		8.0	%	$	43,368		10.0	%

Tier I Capital to Risk Weighted Assets
Heritage Financial Group Consolidated	$	59,137		13.4	%	$	17,602		4.0	%		-		-
HeritageBank of the South	$	52,107		12.0	%	$	17,347		4.0	%	$	26,021		6.0	%

Tier I Capital to Average Total Assets
Heritage Financial Group Consolidated	$	59,137		8.7	%	$	27,058		4.0	%		-		-
HeritageBank of the South	$	52,107		7.8	%	$	26,697		4.0	%	$	33,371		5.0	%

Heritage Financial Group is subject to Georgia capital requirements for bank holding companies. At September 30, 2010, Heritage Financial Group had total equity of $63.0 million or 9.2% of total assets as of that date. Under Georgia capital requirements for holding companies, Heritage Financial Group had Tier I leverage capital of $59.1 million or 8.7%, which was $32.1 million above the 4.0% requirement.

Index

ITEM 3. QUANTITAVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Asset and Liability Management and Market Risk

Our Risk When Interest Rates Change. The rates of interest we earn on assets and pay on liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Market rates change over time. Like other financial institutions, our results of operations are impacted by changes in interest rates and the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities. The risk associated with changes in interest rates and our ability to adapt to these changes is known as interest rate risk and is our most significant market risk.

How We Measure Our Risk of Interest Rate Changes. As part of our attempt to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates and comply with applicable regulations, we monitor our interest rate risk. In doing so, we analyze and manage assets and liabilities based on their interest rates and payment streams, timing of maturities, repricing opportunities, and sensitivity to actual or potential changes in market interest rates.

To manage the potential for adverse effects of material and prolonged increases in interest rates on our results of operations, we adopted asset and liability management policies to understand, measure, monitor, and control the risk. These policies are designed to allow us to implement strategies to minimize the effects of interest rate changes to net income and capital position by properly matching the maturities and repricing terms of our interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. These policies are implemented by the risk management committee, which is composed of senior management and board members. The risk management committee establishes guidelines for and monitors the volume and mix of assets and funding sources, taking into account relative costs and spreads, interest rate sensitivi ty and liquidity requirements. The objectives are to manage assets and funding sources to produce results that limit negative changes in net income and capital while supporting liquidity, capital adequacy, growth, risk and profitability goals. Senior managers oversee the process on a daily basis. The risk management committee meets quarterly to review, among other things, economic conditions and interest rate outlook, current and projected needs and capital position, anticipated changes in the volume and mix of assets and liabilities, interest rate risk exposure, liquidity position and net portfolio present value. The committee also recommends strategy changes, as appropriate, based on their review. The committee is responsible for reviewing and reporting the effects of the policy implementations and strategies to the board of directors on a quarterly basis.

In order to manage our assets and liabilities and achieve the desired liquidity, credit quality, interest rate risk, profitability and capital targets, we have focused our strategies on:

Limiting the percentage of long-term fixed-rate loans within our portfolio;

Originating a mix of variable-rate and shorter term fixed-rate loans;

Originating prime-based home equity lines of credit;

Managing deposit relationships for stability and a lower cost of funds position;

Using Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other funding sources to align maturities and repricing terms of funding sources with loans; and

Continuing the origination of consumer loans.

The risk management committee has oversight over the asset-liability management of the Company. This committee regularly reviews interest rate risk by forecasting the impact of alternative interest rate environments on net income and the market value of portfolio equity. Market value of portfolio equity is a measurement of the value of the balance sheet at a fixed point in time. It is summarized as the fair value of assets less the fair value of liabilities. The committee reviews computations of the value of capital at current interest rates and alternative interest rates. The variance in the net portfolio value between current interest rate computations and alternative rate computations represents the potential impact on capital if rates were to change.

Index

ITEM 3. QUANTITAVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK (Continued)

Asset and Liability Management and Market Risk

The Company is exposed only to U.S. dollar interest rate changes, and, accordingly, the Company manages exposure by considering the possible changes in the net interest margin. The Company does not have any trading instruments nor does it classify any portion of the investment portfolio as held for trading. The Company monitors its sensitivity to changes in interest rates and may use derivative instruments to hedge this risk. The Company does not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Finally, the Company has no exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk and commodity price risk.

Interest rates play a major part in the net interest income of a financial institution. The sensitivity to rate changes is known as “interest rate risk”. The repricing of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities can influence the changes in net interest income.

The Company uses simulation analysis to monitor changes in net interest income due to changes in market interest rates. The simulation of rising, declining and flat interest rate scenarios allows management to monitor and adjust interest rate sensitivity to minimize the impact of market interest rate swings. The analysis of the impact on net interest income over a twelve-month period is subjected to a shock in interest rates of 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis point increase or decrease in market rates on net interest income and is monitored on a quarterly basis. We also monitor regulatory required interest rate risk analysis which simulates more dramatic changes to rates.

The Company’s strategy is to mitigate interest risk to the greatest extent possible. Based on our analysis of the Company’s overall risk to changes in interest rates, we structure investment and funding transactions to reduce this risk. These strategies aim to achieve neutrality to interest rate risk. Although we strive to have our net interest income neutral to changes in rates, due to the inherent nature of our business, we will never be completely neutral to changes in rates. As of September 30, 2010, a drop in interest rates would increase our net interest income and an increase in rates would decrease our net interest income, also known as liability sensitive. During 2008 and 2009, we put minimum interest rate requirements, also known as floors, in our prime-based floating rate loans. Thes e floors are generally 200 to 300 basis points above their current index rate. These floors allowed us to earn a higher rate of interest than we would have otherwise earned during 2008, 2009 and the first nine months of 2010. However, due to these floors, many of our loans will not reprice when rates rise, until the increase in rates exceeds the loan floor. This lag in repricing is part of the reason we are liability sensitive over the next year in a rising rate environment. We feel that the level of interest rate risk is at an acceptable level, and is within our internal policy limits.

The Company maintains a risk management committee which monitors and analyzes interest rate risk. This committee is comprised of members of senior management and outside directors. This committee meets on a monthly basis and reviews the simulations listed above, as well as other interest rate risk reports.

Index

ITEM 3. QUANTITAVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK (Continued)

The following table sets forth the distribution of the repricing of our earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of September 30, 2010, the interest rate sensitivity gap (i.e., interest rate sensitive assets divided by interest rate sensitivity liabilities), the cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap ratio (i.e., interest rate sensitive assets divided by interest rate sensitive liabilities) and the cumulative sensitivity gap ratio. The table also sets forth the time periods in which earning assets and liabilities will mature or may reprice in accordance with their contractual terms. However, the table does not necessarily indicate the impact of general interest rate movements on the net interest margin since the repricing of various categories of assets and liabilities is subject to competitive pressures and the needs of our c ustomers. In addition, various assets and liabilities indicated as repricing within the same period may in fact reprice at different times within such period and at different rates.

	At September 30, 2010
	Maturing or Repricing Within
	(Dollars in thousands)
	Zero to Three Months			Three Months to One Year			One to Five Years			Over Five Years			Total
Earning assets:
Short-term assets	$	21,874		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	21,874
Investment Securities		11,381			39,470			81,440			29,507			161,798
Loans held for sale		700			-			-			-			700
Loans		126,796			78,797			164,647			43,740			413,980
		160,751			118,267			246,087			73,247			598,352


Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits		(93,640	)		-			-			-			(93,640	)
Savings and money market		(206,961	)		-			-			-			( 206,961	)
Time Deposits		(35,505	)		(89,227	)		(51,388	)		(3,536	)		(179,656	)
Other Borrowings		(35,092	)		-			-			-			(35,092	)
FHLB Advances		-			(7,500	)		(10,000	)		(25,000	)		(42,500	)
		(371,198	)		(96,727	)		(61,388	)		(28,536	)		(557,849	)


Interest rate sensitivity gap	$	(210,447	)	$	21,540		$	184,699		$	44,711		$	40,503
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap	$	(210,447	)	$	(188,907	)	$	(4,208	)	$	40,503
Interest rate sensitivity gap ratio		0.43			1.22			4.01			2.50
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap ratio		0.43			0.60			0.99			1.07

Index

ITEM 3. QUANTITAVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK (Continued)

The following table shows the results of our projections for net interest income expressed as a percentage change over net interest income in a flat rate scenario for an immediate change or “shock” in market interest rates over a twelve month period. Due to the historically low level of interest rates, we do not believe downward shocks greater than 50 basis points are relevant. In addition, due to the historically low interest rate environment, there is concern that we may say dramatic increases in interest rates when they begin to rise. To address this concern, we increased our upward interest rates shocks to include a shock of 400 basis points.

Market Rate Change		Effecton Net Interest Income




+400		-12.0 %
+300		-12.4 %
+200		-12.8 %
+100		-6.3 %
-50		2.3 %

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act (the “Exchange Act”)) that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange act is recorder, processed, summarize and reported accurately and within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate. An evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures was carried out as of September 30, 2010, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer, and other members of senior management.

Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information we are required to disclose in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to our management (including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer) to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

We intend to continually review and evaluate the design and effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and to improve the Company’s controls and procedures over time and to correct any deficiencies that we may discover in the future. The goal is to ensure that senior management has timely access to all material financial and non-financial information concerning the Company’s business. While we believe the present design of the disclosure controls and procedures is effective to achieve its goal, future events affecting its business may cause the Company to modify its disclosure controls and procedures.

Index

ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (Continued)

We do not expect that our controls and procedures over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in controls or procedures can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people , or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of change in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Act) that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2010, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Index

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the normal course of business, the Company occasionally becomes involved in various legal proceedings. In our opinion, any liability from such proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the business or financial condition of the Company.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Not required, registrant is a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the quarter ended September 30, 2010.

On December 16, 2008, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to 250,000 shares, or approximately 10% of its then outstanding publicly held shares of common stock over a one-year period. This program has been extended to expire on December 31, 2010. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had purchased 77,604 shares at a weighted average price of $8.30 per share under the plan for a total of $644,000. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had 172,396 remaining shares that may be purchased under the current authorization. The repurchases may be made from time to time in open-market or negotiated transactions as deemed appropriate by the Company and will depend on market conditions.

	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid Per Share		Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number of Shares that may yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July	-	$	-	-	172,396
August	-		-	-	172,396
September	-		-	-	172,396
Total	-	$	-	-	172,396

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

Index

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number	Document	Reference to Prior Filing or Exhibit Number Attached Hereto

2.0	Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation, or succession	++++
3.1	Charter of the Registrant	***
3.2	Bylaws of the Registrant	*
4	Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures:
	Form of Heritage Financial Group Common Stock Certificate	**
10	Material contracts:
	(1) Employment Agreements:
	(a) (i) O. Leonard Dorminey - Bank	*
	(a) (ii) O. Leonard Dorminey – Holding Company	*
	(c) Carol W. Slappey	*
	(2) Deferred Compensation and Excess/Matching Contribution Plans	*
	(3) Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan	*
	(4) Directors’ Retirement Plan	*
	(5) 401(k) Savings Plan	**
	(6) Employee Stock Ownership Plan	*
	(7) Purchase and Assumption Agreement dated September 1, 2009, between HeritageBank of the South and Atlantic Coast Federal Bank	+
	(8) Definitive Whole-bank Purchase and Assumption Agreement dated December 4, 2009, between HeritageBank of the South and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation	++
	(9) Purchase and Assumption Agreement dated February 23, 2010, between HeritageBank of the South and The Park Avenue Bank	+++
	(10) Employment agreement by and between T. Heath Fountain and HeritageBank of the South dated July 21, 2010	****
	(11) Employment agreement by and between O. Mitchell Smith and HeritageBank of the South dated July 21, 2010	****
11	Statement re: computation of per share earnings	None
15	Letter re: unaudited interim financial information	None
18	Letter re: change in accounting principles	None
22	Published report regarding matters submitted to vote of security holders	None
23	Consent of Accountants	None
24	Power of Attorney	None
31	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications	31
32	Section 1350 Certifications	32

_______________________

*	Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-123581), declared effective by the SEC on May 16, 2005.

**	Filed as an exhibit to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2. (File No. 333-123581) declared effective by the SEC on May 16, 2005.

***	Filed as an exhibit to the Filer’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the SEC on March 30, 2006.
****	Included as an exhibit to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 23, 2010.
+	Included as an exhibit to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 2, 2009.
++	Included as an exhibit to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 8, 2009.
+++	Included as an exhibit to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 25, 2010.
++++	Included as an exhibit to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 19, 2010.

Index

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		HERITAGE FINANCIAL GROUP


Date: November 15, 2010	By:	/s/ O. Leonard Dorminey
		O. Leonard Dorminey
		President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 15, 2010	By:	/s/ T. Heath Fountain
		T. Heath Fountain
		Senior Vice President and
		Chief Financial Officer

EX-31.1 2 ex31_1.htm EXHIBIT 31.1 ex31_1.htm

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, O. Leonard Dorminey, certify that:

1)	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Heritage Financial Group;

2)	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3)	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15f and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the filer’s third fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the filer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5)	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2010	By:	/s/ O. Leonard Dorminey
		O. Leonard Dorminey
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2 3 ex31_2.htm EXHIBIT 31.2 ex31_2.htm

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, T. Heath Fountain, certify that:

1)	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Heritage Financial Group;

2)	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3)	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

5)	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2010	By:	/s/ T. Heath Fountain
		T. Heath Fountain
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

EX-32 4 ex32.htm EXHIBIT 32 ex32.htm

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Heritage Financial Group (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.

Date: November 15, 2010	By:	/s/ O. Leonard Dorminey
		O. Leonard Dorminey
		President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 15, 2010	By:	/s/ T. Heath Fountain
		T. Heath Fountain
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

GRAPHIC 5 logo.jpg LOGO begin 644 logo.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!``$`8`!@``#__@`?3$5!1"!496-H;F]L;V=I97,@26YC M+B!6,2XP,0#_VP"$``4%!0@%"`P'!PP,"0D)#`T,#`P,#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T- M#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T!!0@("@<*#`<'#`T, M"@P-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T-#0T- M#0T-#0T-#?_$`:(```$%`0$!`0$!```````````!`@,$!08'"`D*"P$``P$! M`0$!`0$!`0````````$"`P0%!@<("0H+$``"`0,#`@0#!04$!````7T!`@,` M!!$%$B$Q008346$'(G$4,H&1H0@C0K'!%5+1\"0S8G*""0H6%Q@9&B4F)R@I M*C0U-CH.$A8:' MB(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7 MV-G:X>+CY.7FY^CIZO'R\_3U]O?X^?H1``(!`@0$`P0'!00$``$"=P`!`@,1 M!`4A,08205$'87$3(C*!"!1"D:&QP0DC,U+P%6)RT0H6)#3A)?$7&!D:)BH*#A(6& MAXB)BI*3E)66EYB9FJ*CI*6FIZBIJK*SM+6VM[BYNL+#Q,7&Q\C)RM+3U-76 MU]C9VN+CY.7FY^CIZO+S]/7V]_CY^O_``!$(`'@![0,!$0`"$0$#$0'_V@`, M`P$``A$#$0`_`/LN@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@` MH`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*` M"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`Z4`<5)\2/#$3%'U M2Q5E)4@W$8((."#\W4'BHYX]T9>TA_,OO&CXE^%B<#5;#)_Z>(__`(JESQ[H M/:0_F7WG3:CK%EI%L;V^GBMK8;M6VEJ]$6Y**NVDO\` M,YC_`(69X6_Z"MA_X$1__%5'/'NB?:0_F7WA_P`+,\+?]!6P_P#`B/\`^*HY MX]T'M(?S+[SK3J%LMM]M,B"V\OS?-+`1^7C=OW=-NWG/3'-7?KT*YE;FOIO? MI8Y+_A9GA;_H*V'_`($1_P#Q51SQ[HGVD/YE]X?\+,\+?]!6P_\``B/_`.*H MYX]T'M(?S+[RU9^/_#E_*(+;4[&21NBK<19/T&[D^U/FCLF@]I#^9?>==5F@ M4`%`'*>,[;7KK3S'X7GM[2_WJ?,ND+Q^6,[E`"N`Y.W!*,,9&`2"`#Y&\9?% MGXD?#F\6PUHV+O*GF1R+"K1R)DJ2K(8SD$8*LJL.#C!!(!S^G_M&>.-7N8K& MRCLY;FY=8HD2V.YW<@*!F7')/4X`ZG`YH`^G?!]A\1FO8;GQ)>:='9#)EM8( MMTK`J=H$@0!2&()(D88!&#F@#T'Q?#K4^F2IX:E@M]2.WRGN5+1@!@7&`K@, M5R%)1@#U'<`'R9XS^)GQ.^&YB76Q8LEQN$4R1(Z.4QN7,;(58`@X95R#D9P< M`'&1?M+>,[J1((5LFDD9415MF+,S$!0`93DDD`#UH`^GO`,'Q'GODNO%4UC# MI^QB]K&B&.#)O#YY!'0`'Z%^'=9C\0Z9:ZK""L=[;Q3JIZJ)$#;3[KG&>^*`-F@!% M8.`RD%3R".00>X-`"T`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4 M`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0!#!6\;ZW'%*N;&T(FNCT!4'Y8^G)D88 MQUV[CVK6G'F?DMS6G#VDN7IU]/\`@['N_P"T+XY32[1/"FGD)).JO<;.!'`/ MN18'3S"`2/[@`Z-715E9Z*\``\I%GAY3T`&0O5NF#K"#F_(UA!S=H_-]%_GZ'WDOB31]#O;3 MPPUP!>R0A88F)9RD:X7>V,!F"DJ&(+X.!7H746H=3U.:,&J5]=E_P?-G759L M%`!0!\/?M9_\A'2_^O:?_P!&)0!XW\$P#XUTK/\`S\-_Z*DH`_46@`H`^4/V ML?\`D#Z;_P!?DG_HDT`?'7@W_D.Z;_U_VG_H^.@#]=*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@ M`H`IZC8Q:G:S64XS%:'/F[PO5`I&[@/M^:@#[WT+2(?#^GVVEVV?)LH(X$)ZE8T"`GW.,GW- M`'C_`,?_`!XO@_P[)9V[[=0U4-;PA3ADB(_?R\<@!#Y:GJ'D4CH<`'0?!!BW M@K2LDG]PXY]!/*`/H!P/0<4`>JT`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0 M`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0!Y;\:;F2T\'ZB\1*LT<:9'!VO-&C#CU4 MD?0UE4TB[?UJ<];X';R_-'-_`9`G@I".K279/UWL/Y`5-+X/O,Z/\-_/\CX/ MN?\`72?[[?\`H1KSF>6MEZ(^C/V:=$-UK-SJ;H"EG!L5CGY9)FQQVSL5\^@/ MO7516K?8ZZ"O._97^_1?J[SL,1P`XZ*2(Q[[CWKT8I4HW>_ZGI17L*;D_B?3SZ+_/ MYGPMKVMW/B*_FU.];?/KWZF12$>F_#3X: M7OQ!O=B9@L(6'VBXQP!U\N/LTK#H.BCYFXQG6$'-^75FD(.H^6/S?;_@]D?2 MOC_X@Z;\)=-C\.>'$07JIM51AA;@\F6;NTKYR`>2>3QQ75*:I+ECO^1USFJ2 M]E2WZOM_FV?*7A?5KN^\46&H7,KRW4NHVS/*QRS%ID!R?H2`!P!P!BN.+;DG MYK\SCC\2]5^9^G%>J>X%`!0!\/?M9_\`(1TO_KVG_P#1B4`>.?!+_D==*_Z^ M&_\`1,E`'ZB4`%`'RA^UC_R!]-_Z_)/_`$2:`/CKP;_R'=-_Z_[3_P!'QT`? MKI0!6O+V#3H7NKN1(((5+222,$1%'4LS$`#W)H`^>M6_:2TA;O\`L_P]97FN M7!)5?(4QHY'_`#SRKRN/?R0,<@XYH`@N?VA+CP^\?_"3>']1TJ&4X64G&9LA0#K/'GQ%TCX=V@NM5D/F29$-O&`TTQ'78I(`49&YV*HN0,Y M(!`/#-'_`&K-+N[Q8-0L)K*U=@OGK*LQ0'C=)&(T.WNVQF('16H`^J8)X[F- M)H6$D"M(CU?46(>ZB5[>U4@S3,R!@BCH%7":`/I?P[XAL?%5A%JNER>= M:7`8QN59"=K%&!5P&!#*001V]*`%UWQ#IWABU:^U:XBL[=>-\K8R?[JKRSL> MRH&8]A0!XN?CR-6WMX6T35-;AB)!G2(Q0DC^Z=DK'Z,JM[4`<*/VK([6=K>_ MT:>W:-BKJ+@>8A'!!C>",AAW!*^]`'T9X)\;Z9X^TX:II+L8]QCDC<;9(I`` M2DB@D`X8,"I*LI!!ZX`.OH`\2\<_'OPYX*F:RW/J-[&/[K,/>@#J_`_P`=_#WC.X73V,FFW[': ML%UM4._39'*#M+YX"-L!XR>"QNV'T,CXI4M(?> M94?X;^9\$SDF1R>NYOYFO./+6R]$?MKFI?V#:.?LFG,1+M/RR7&!G.."(N5&?XBU*K M*[Y5LOS%6GS2LMEHO7J_T^\^=JYCF/4OAE\,;OX@7?.Z#3H2//GQU_Z9QYX+ MG\E')K:%-S?D:0@ZCY8_-]O^#V1]&^/_`(A:9\)M.7PUX:2,7JI@*O*VX8;`P#TRFJ2Y8;_E_P3KG-45[*EOU?;_.7Y'Q5>WL^HSO=73M+ M-,Q=W8Y9F/4D_P"<#BN!N^K.`V_!G_(>TW_K_M/_`$?'51^)>J_,N/Q+U7YG MZD5ZQ[@4`%`'P]^UG_R$=+_Z]I__`$8E`'C?P3('C72L\?Z0WZQ2?SH`_46@ M`H`^3_VL2!I&FCO]LDX^D)_Q'YT`?'?@W_D.Z;_U_P!I_P"CXZ`/UT)QR:`/ MSF^.GQ7F\;:B^E6$A71K*0J@4X%S*APT[X^\@.1"#P%^?[SG`!]5_`SX=0>" MM"ANYHU_M/48UGN)"!O1'`:.`'JJHI!<#[TI8G("X`/3_%'ART\6:9<:1?H' MANHV3D9*-CY)%]'C;#J1T(],T`?FCX"\9W_PMU\S1'Y$D>VO(22(Y$5BC;@, MG=&PWH0-P(('#,"`>F_&`_$9[/[;X@E0Z-*5`&GR*+3#\Q[U4B5E?(V-/N!. M!D$@$`\M^$VM6OASQ19:I?OY=M:?:)9&[X%K/A5'=G8A$'=F`[T`?1NG?"FZ M^,EM<>,_$D\]O-J"2-IEK$5VPP+N^S[]ZME&/(10A<$REMTGR@'Q7/A*VO(M5=K*'3TF_LW=);O'"L6_P`KY/DF98^< M2E2?N=@*`/DR@#]5&\":%XNT^PFUJSBO)(+.%(VDW956C0D#:R\$\\T`?F-X MEM(K#5KVUMUV0P7=Q'&N2=J),ZJ,G).%`&3S0!]S_"3X5^%M<\*:=J&H:=!< M74\3M)*_F;F(FD4$X<#H`.!VH`]1\2Z]HWP@\/&>.)(+6V!CM;6+Y?-FX^^Q$7/HHH`]2_9*=C::NF?E$MH0.P)2<$_B` M/R%`'FZ:YBO]4WKYBG#0VZ8$KJ1RKN6$:-U`+LI#*#0!\J_ M`?PC%XP\50QWBB6ULD>\F1AE7\LJ(U;/!#2NA8'AE#`]:`/TKN+:*[B>WG19 M(95*.C`%61AAE93P00<$=,4`?E)\1_#`\'>(K[1X\^3;S$PYZ^3(!+%D]R$= M5)[D&@#V3X1?!71/B3H[:A->7=O=03O#/%&(2@(`>-EW(6PR,.I^\&QP*`/H M;XN?$!?A1X>@T_3FWZC-$MM:%\,T<<**CW+CH2HVA01AI6!P55A0!\M_`SP/ M_P`+&\127^L;KJUL<7-SYA+&>>1CY4\\O0![ MO0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`'DWQQ./!NH8](?\`THBK&K\+^7YG/6^! M_+\T5/A`"G@6V/\`TPN"/^^Y:(:07S,Z7\)_]O?FS\_X;>2]G6"(;I)I`BJ. M[.VT#\2<5YJU/+6RMV/NGXLWJ>"O`RZ7;[8GFBAL43.3MVCSL>IVJV3_`+6: M]"I[D.5>AZ57]W24%I>R^[5_UYGQ+H&AW/B2_@TNR7=/Q]R>-=8M/@]X233]-PMRT?V>VQ]XRLI,EPW?CYGS_`'BH MZ5Z$FJ4;+T7^9Z,VJ$%".[_IO_+Y'P,[M*Q=R69B2S$Y)).223R23R37G'FG MJGPQ^%E[X_N1,08-,@<":8Y&_G)CB_O.1U(X3.2`K M.>]\0:=';1O*RWMLY"*6PB3(S,<=%5022>`!5P7O*W=%Q^)>J_,_3^O5/<"@ M`H`^'OVL_P#D(Z7_`->T_P#Z,2@#YV\!^'W\5:]9:1',;1KJ8*)U!+1[5+EE M`93N`4[?F'..:`/LO_AG*[_Z&34_R?\`^2:`#_AG*[_Z&34_R?\`^2:`/#_C M9\*YO`5K9WLNIW&JBXE>';54(`H&`!@#T`H`IZCJ5MH]M)>WTB6]O`I M>21R%55`R22?T'4G@`DT`?D5K]^NJZE=WT8VI=7,\R@]0)96<#\`U`'V9XHU M!]3^"\$\A)806<1)ZGR;M(1^D8H`^)K.W-W/';KUED1!]68*/YT`?L)I]E'I MMM#9P@+%;Q)$@'0+&H11^``H`\TG^"?A&XU0ZU)8*UPTAF9-\GD-(3N+F#=Y M9RWS%=NPGDJ:`.[\2C&D7H'_`#Z7'_HEZ`/R"H`_8'P]_P`@RS_Z]8/_`$4E M`'Y0^,?^0[J/_7_=_P#H^2@#]'_@?_R).E?]<7_]'RT`>!?M5VNJW%WIS1QR MOIL<,F&169%N6?YP^T$!C&(]F[&1OV_Q4`5/V:/AWJ$>IMXGU"&2VMK>%X[7 MS5*-++*-K.@8`F-(]X+8PS.`I.UL`'V]0!^=W[3EW%<>+]D3!V@LK>.0`YV/ MNEDVGT.R1&QZ,*`/4/V2?^/;5_\`KI9_^@W%`'G'[45Q))XLCB8G9%80A!V^ M:29F(^I_E0!T_P"R9$IU'5)?XDMH%'T:1R?U04`?<-`'YT_M,1+'XR=EX,EG M;,WU`=/Y**`/0_V2KF3SM7M^?+V6DF.P;,Z_J/Y4`>-_';Q,_B7Q=>$-F"P; M[%",\`0$B0C_`'IC(V?0CTH`^G?V6--2V\-7%Z,>9=7S@GOMBCC51^!9S^/O M0!]-4`?$_P"U;XAM+J;3]&@=9+FU,TTZJ0?+$@C6-6QT9MK-M/(7:2,,,@'+ M_LLZ@]OXFN+0']W3:`._TS7%25 MY+R/.I1YI17H_NU/1OVF?$!N-0M-%C8%+6(SR`8R))254'N,1C./]JM:SU43 MHQ$KRY5T7XO_`(%CK_V??!$>C:?)XHU%0DMPI\AGX\NV49:3G@>81G/]Q1SS M6E&-ESOY>A=""2=66RV_5GSU\5?&[>.=;END)^QVY,-JO_3-3]_']Z0Y8]P" M!VKFG+F=^G0Y)RYY.7W>G3_,TOA5\+;GQ_=^=.&ATJ!OWTPX,A'/DQ$]6/\` M$W(0>Y`ITZ?/Z%4Z;J.VR6[_`*ZGT-\2_B58?#.P7PUX;6-+U8]BJF-EHA'W MV]9FSN53SD[W[`],YJFN6._Y'74J*FO9T]'U?;_@_D?$=Q<2W<1JI=@B@EF.``,DD]``.23Z4`>_>`O@%JOB,K=ZSN MTRRX(5A_I$@/]U#Q&/=^?1371"DWK+1'1"C*>NR[O]%_F?3%@/"/PL-OI,!A MMKJ\DCB1?]9=B]G1:BOB?S?S[(]5 MK4ZPH`*`/A[]K/\`Y".E_P#7M/\`^C$H`\<^"7_(ZZ5_U\-_Z)DH`_42@`H` M^4/VL?\`D#Z;_P!?DG_HDT`?'7@W_D.Z;_U_VG_H^.@#[,_:NNFCT.PMP<++ M?%C[^7"X'_H=`'QAX2T2;Q'K%GI5M)]GFN[B.-)>?W9+#]Y\I!RGWA@@Y'!' M6@#[J7X0>,$4(/%]]@#`_=R$_F;G/ZT`$/AC)HMLS2160M(P[8#.? MM4;.Y`X&YV9L#IG&3B@#X/\`#W_(3L_^OJ#_`-&I0!^P%`!0!B>)O^03>_\` M7I#>+/BM/J5\?"O@-%U'6'RLUUP;2Q4JIJ?C2]$9RMJL-MG_:CB4N/PD9@?<&@#Z6_9D\*2:%X?FU>Y4I)JL@>,$8 M/V>$,L;?\#=I&'8IL8<&@#X.U:X:[O;BX?EI9Y78^[.S']30!]2?!KX8>(-9 MT)=7TK7KC1H;N60"WA5V4^4QC+L!-&NXE2.%)V@98]``>GW?P5\5WR&.?Q;? MLAZC9*H/_?-T*`.)?]DUY&+OK.YF.23:$DD]22;G))]30!Z;\*_@5#\-M1DU M9[UKZ=X6@11"(417969C^\D+,=@`Z``GJ2,`'OU`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`% M`!0`4`>2_'+_`)$W4/I!_P"E$58U/A?R_,PK?`_E^9+\,/\`D1K'_KRD_G)3 MA\"]"8?POD_U/*OV9-(,<.HZJZD>9(ENC9X(0%W&/4%EY/T'>L:"LFSFPJWE MV27Z_P"1YR=*D^+OCZX7@6<U96]I-]OT1CK5 MG9=6_N77[K?-GK'Q]\9Q>'-+B\+:;B*2ZC`D5.!#:I@!`!T\PC:!_2BE2CHNOIT7]?J?/7PS^&=YX_O!PT.G0L//GZ>>E^!_A'KGC&D(YZ87/5A6L:;EMMW M-84Y5/A6G?I_P?D?6.C>!O"7PAMO[2O73SU'-U=$-(2!DK!'@[2>PC4OV+8K ML48TM7][_0[E"G0]Z;N^E_T7]/S/&?'/[15[J&^S\-I]C@.5^TR`&=AZHI^6 M+/8G#?^0[IO\`U_VG M_H^.@#[2_:KLFF\/V=THX@O@K>PDAE_J@%`'R!\-;Y=,\4:5_]>EQ_Z)>@#\@J`/V!\/?\@RS_`.O6#_T4E`'Y0^,? M^0[J/_7_`'?_`*/DH`_1_P"!_P#R).E?]<7_`/1\M`'J4TR6Z-+*RQQQJ6=F M(5551EF8G```!))X`Y-`'PC\6?CG>^,;D^'?"ADBL9'$!ECRLUZ[-L")T:.% MB<*HP\H/SD*=E`'U)\*?AQ;?#C2$M%"O?SA9+R<=7EQ]Q3U\J+)5!T/+D;G- M`'R'^U$1_P`);&!VT^#_`-&W%`'I/[)/_'MJ_P#UTL__`$&XH`^L=5TJUUNT MET^_C6>VN4,S_&YE>%O"-SX/\*G1[78]^L$YW`X1[F0,0V2 M`=NXJ!N&0H&>E*,>2/*M[?B9Q@Z=-P7Q6?WLYCP)X:M_@_X;N-1UO"G@G5/C/K<^N M:CNM["27?-+SRN?EMX,]2J@*6Z(.3EB`>:,74ES/;^M$RDYW?,_'!WG-4URQW_(Z M9U%27LZ6_5]O\W^1\J:!X4UWXA7KM9QR74LKEIKF0D("QY:20\9]AD^@Q7(H MRF]#A47)VBKO^MW_`)GU9X2^"&@^"8?[4\2RQ7[25EW:_)?Y_(M1\2W!N]5N)+J8]"[9"C MT1?NHOLH`KCZ7$-UPT?FVX[F:$B1%'NY7R_HYH`_*X%[=\C*/&WT*LI_,$$?@:`/U5^&7 MC6#QYH-MJ<;`SA!%=(#S'<(`)`1V#G]XGJCKWS0!W]`''>/?&%OX$T6XUFYP M3"NV&,G'FSMQ%&._S-RV.50,W130!XM\3M7OM>^%1U/58TM[N[CLYI(XPP4! M[J,H0&+,-T91B"3@DB@#X9\/?\A.S_Z^H/\`T:E`'[`4`%`&)XF_Y!-[_P!> MEQ_Z)>@#\@J`/V!\/?\`(,L_^O6#_P!%)0!^4?C-2FO:DIX(O[L?^1Y*`/T: M^!
"=+*G.(I5/L1<3`C\Z`/$OC_\`%NUU'2I-!T*9F+WDEM>R*"JE8%1G MCC?HZ/(ZJ[#@B-EY1P2`>!?!%;9O&FEB[P$\]BN>GFB*0P_CYNS;_M8H`_4. M@#\POCCXDA\3>+KVXMF$D%N4M8V!R&$"A7*GH5,OF%2.",$=:`/=_P!DF9!% MJ\.1OW6;;>^W%P,_3/%`&Q^T'\7]1\*7">'-#86TTL*S7%TI!E17+!8HQSY3 MD+O9R-^UD\O;]X@'(_L_^//"?A^VN&UR5;;6YYV9[RY5G,L3!=JK/AMF&W%U M8J7)W$MP%`/I^/XI^$I?NZOI_P"-S$/YL*`.AT_Q1I&K$+8WMIBPW$4C? M]\JY/Z4`;E`'YN?M#>$W\-^*IKM5Q;:L/M438X\PX6X7/]X2Y]5V*P.S:,LA&TDM'(0V%P0#UV@`H`*`"@` MH`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`/./BUK%YH'A>]O].D-OF23@=JT564?/U-(U9QV?R>O M_!_$^F_#OC3P]\;-/?1[^,Q3_+)+:.Y#'8-+CPNL7@SP=:NVI2PKM\J,XMX6RH9,#!D;!^<_ M*GWF.<4IR;[]#D?!?[/?S?VIXPF\QR?,:V5^">I M,\VZNW7YOI^?F=)XK^->@>!8#I/AJ&*ZGA&Q5A M`2TB..I=/]80>JIUYRX[U*I&&D?^`6ZT::Y:27KT_P"#_6I\E>*O'&K^,IS/ MJUPTBYRD*DK#'[)&#@?4Y;WKCE)RW.)RY9LX M$43OTZ\@8X^M2HM[(E:Z+^ON/5=%^`7BO50KRPQ6,;$9-Q(`X!ZDQIN;CT.# M6RI2?D;*E-[*WKI_P?P/3K']G#3M+C^T>(=4V(.HC"0)UX_>2DG_`,=')K94 M4OB9M[#EUG))?UU?^1OZ/%\+O#&HV\%B8KN_>>.*%LRW12;>%1MW,2'>1AP! MSR.!PU[.+5M_FRE[&+5KMWTW:W^2/I:NH]`*`.&\?>/K+X>6*7]]%<7`ED\J M..W0.Q?:6^8EE5%PIY)Z\`&@#X'^*?C'5?BIJ,=['I]Q;VUK$8H(ECDD;#,6 M9W8(`68X&%`"A0.3EB`<;X;_`+;\'ZG;:U;65QYUE*)5$EO-L;&0RM\H.&4E M3@@@'((-`'WA\-_C?;>/+M=)GL;JPOV1GY'F6_R+N;][A&3I\H>,`DA=Q8@$ M`]'\:>,+7P-IK:M>QSSQ(Z)LMT#ON/6>D:SID\5Y%9W226 M\B2H3;RX#QL'4GY.Q`H`^^?AY\=K7QC=0Z/?V5UI^I3`@#87MV94+,0_#Q@A M20'0@<`R$\D`\N^.'P(N;FYE\1^&(O.\XF2[LHQ\_F'EIH%_C#GYI(A\V\ED M#!BJ@'S7X/\`'&M_#>^:XTQV@D^Y/;RJ3'(%S\LL1P1]TLJ_NX\J=R@%;XP?&"T\;Z,WA[P[97LJ321&29X M"B!(G#JL2+N6"!5R,$G@`^78-"UBUD2>.SNU:-E=3]GEX*D$'[GJ!0! M]VZ#^T;I,T$:ZY:7^G76U1+_`*,\D.[`W,C+^\VDY(!CR.G/4@'T1%,LT:RH M6MUI'AW3[NXEFCEM_M$T;1HF]61G2 M(!I&(!.T/Y>#@L#RI`/C0^'-4`S]CNL>OV>7'_H%`'WA\-_CG8:E%8:#J5K> MVFI%8;7/D%X7D55C#[E.]`Y`+;H\)DY;:-U`'S'\>_!UQX8\47-T4(L]3D:Z M@DQ\I:3YIH\]`Z2%OEZ[&1NAH`RO!/Q#\765F?"?AR1W6]=EBCCC#S(TO#^3 M)UB#'2EPEW>"*.,B(\,GG)&KRS.N0$#Y.5M11()%8@[&B965\L`5!4D,`5P:`/K?P9\"9O%.E7VI^-C)_;.LE9(I&_U] MIMR5=APH>0D!X.%6%5C^1N$`/D?6?"&H:1K-QX?6,WEY:RM&5M0TV_&"&4(" MW(()!`9"2K`,"``69OAYXFMUW2:5J"KZ_9)_Z)0!R\]M/82>7.DD$J<[75D< M'Z$`B@#Z(^#?QOU+P]J$&D:W.]WI5PZQ!IF+R6K.=J.LC98Q`D"2-B0JY9,% M2&`/L7XE?#VS^(^DMIMR?*GC/F6MP!DPRXQDC^*-Q\LB9Y&",,JD`'YM^+/! M&M^`;S[/JD$ENR-F*=,F*3!RKPS``'IG&0Z_Q*IXH`]C\,_M.^(-%MEM=1A@ MU3RP`LLC-%,0.!YCIN5S_M%`QZLS'F@#?'Q>\>?%=CI'AFT2Q27Y99X`Y,:- M@$O=/\D(P>J()3_RS);B@#Z=^&/PZM?AOI8L8F\^[G(EN[@C!EEQT&>1'&"5 MC4\\LQ^9VH`]'H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@#R7XY?\`(FZA](/_`$HB MK&I\+^7YF%;X'\OS/SLKS3QPH`NZ=J-SI%S'>V4C07$#!XY$."K#^G8@\$9! M&*:=M4-::H_1OX9^-+?QWI,>I`*MY&!#=+\NY9%')XY"2??0=,''4&O2A+G5 M^O4]:E-35W\2T?\`G\SRGXA^&?'OCG49["U9+/1$DV1YE$8E4*N7D"%I9`6S MA2-O'W:RG&2ZY\?_`!3JWRV\L6GQ^EN@W=?[\F]O8XQT MK%U9/;0P=:;ZV]-/^#^)Y-J>MW^LOYFH7$UTV2?WLC.!N.3@$X&3S@`"L6V] MV87ZFCX,XU[3?^O^T_\`1\=./Q+U7YE1^)>J_,_4BO6/<"@`(!ZT`%`!0`8` MY[T`!&>#0`4`%`!COWH`*`.>U?PEHVOG=J=C:7C?WIH(W;_OIE+?K0!!I7@C M0-#?S=.TZRM9!R'CMXEH[4`4-%\*:/X;W'2;*ULB_W MC!#'&S#T+*H)'L3B@#?H`XV[^'?AF^F-S<:7823$Y+M;0Y)ZY/R>?+C)VJN<'!*3&Y&'48.#T8,I((!^6'BO0)/"NKW>CR MMO:RG>(/TW*K?(^.V]=K8[9H`_5WPW.]UI5E/+S)+:6[M_O-$C']2:`-*ZM( M+Z,P7,:3Q-]Y)%5T/U5@0?Q%`''?\*R\*^9YW]D:=OSG/V6'K]-F/TH`[&TL MX+",06L<<$2_=2-%1!]%4`#\!0!8H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`*`"@`H`\_ M^*FC2Z]X7U"RMP6E:'S$4=6,3K+M'UV8`[FLYJ\6D855>#MZ_<[GYI=*\L\< M*`"@#Z*_9NUV2RUZ72RW[F^@9MO;S8<,I^NPN*Z:+L[=T=5"5IVZ--?JOU.G M^)GQ@\4Z3J]UI&E1+;0VL@19E@:5Y!@-NRX9`#G'RKVZUI.I)-J/0NI5FI.* M=DGY7_$^>]9UWQ%X@8OJ4U]<[N"K^;LQG.-@`0`'H-OIZ5S-R>YR-M[N_J[G M._V?<_\`/&;_`+]O_P#$U%F+^MT']GW7_/&;_OV__P`319A_6X?V?=?\\9O^ M_;__`!-%F'];A_9]U_SQF_[]O_\`$T68?UN=[\,O#-[K'B2PB2&54AN(YY7* M,H2.%Q(S$D8'W0H]20!UK2$6Y+U+@FY)+NOSU/TEKTSVPH`*`/`O$5]J\7CZ MP\/6^I7<&GZE:3W4D:"V+(\8GPL3O;LRQ_NUX;>>OS<\`'HGAG3]2L-1OEN- M1?5;$"%(5F$`FMIP'::)S#%$O`ZEAG#8QQD@&UXHBFDTNY:WGELY8H9)4 MEAV;U:-"PXD21"I(`8%>1QD=:`//_@EJNH^(?#<.M:M=S7ES>-*&#B)8XQ%- M)&HC6*-,9506+%B3TP.*`/1_$$,DUA.(9I;218V=98=F]2@+#_6(ZD$C#`J< MC(XZT`>%?"GXAZNNI-X5\92"2_N(H[S3[K:J+VGEM)889)4EAV;@T:,Z@B1'4J2!N4KR.,B@#QOX4_$#53J,WA#QA(' MU4*+FRN-JHMW;R*),+L5%+(I++A>9@D42L[L>BJH+,Q]@`2 M:`/%_!'B'5/BH;C6$GETO0XIF@LX;<(MQ<^7C?//,ZNR+R%6*$)\VX,YV98` M[_0])U72;^X6YO'O],DCC:V$XC^T03!G$L9>.-/-B9=C(SY=3N4Y^\0#I+^U M:\@>!)9+9G&!+"5$B<@Y4NKKGC'S*PP3Q0!XS\"]9U3Q-I4^JZQ>S7DPNY[5 M4=84C5(O+*L%BB0^82QRQ8C!P%&,D`]QH`\4\8?$:7P]XQT?1^5T^Z\R&[?` MV?:+@`6J%CT9"JN1D?),">U`'M=`'*^-_M":)>7%G<2V<]K;37$I4`%`'Y3?$ZWGT[Q;JJ3Y\U;^>0$]U>0RQGZ%&4CV(H`_3 MOPMKD'B32;35;5@T5W!'(,=B5&]#_M(X9&'9E(H`WJ``D`9/`%`'YDZU8/\` M%+X@7-OIF9([^_91(O(6WC(1YR1_"(D,F>^0!R0*`/TQMX$MHTAC&U(U5%'H MJ@`#\`*`/)_&?CB]37+3P9X=V+J=ZIFN+J1?,2RM5R3((\@23,%/EJYV`E-P M.\8`-S4/#6KVBPW.E:G=R7,,L32Q71@>"YAWKYZ,H@7R7,>XQO%LVL`""#D` M'H-`'A7QGUC5?#S:5<:5?7%F+_4;>PFC00,ACDWEG421.RR\8#!L8_AXH`)M M>U?PEXWL/#SW>*?$T_A?1Y?L=KI,22:E=HJM,TDG^KM;?>&CC."6EF9'8;61`K#<0"AX MZU75OAC#'K]O<3:GI,C;AC9@D`'L-E M>1:A!'=V[!X9XTEC8=&1U#*P^JD&@#Q'XQZOJN@7&D2:5?W%FNI:C!8S1HL# M)Y/EXY`/0O&%O=6?A^Y>SO+BWN;&UEFCN!Y32.\,3L/- M#Q&-PQ&7`1&-)AU;1[V>RF^U0VS(BPO$R2[RS,LL3G>"!M8,!C@@YS0!6\9Z[JW MPYU72)H[V;4-.U6[2QN;6Z6%G5GVA9X)(XHG4C<2R-N0D``#=\H![S0`4`!& M>#0!\B_%;X$SR3R:QX83S!*2\UF,!@Y)):`8`P>\?7/W?2N.I2ZP^X\VI1<7 M>&J[=5_P/Q1\X-X.UU"5.G7X*G!_T6?J/HF/RKEY9=G]QR\DNS^YC?\`A$-< M_P"@=?\`_@)/_P#&Z.679CY)=G]QZE\&/#&KVGBRRGN+.[MXH_.9I)8)8T`\ MEQ@LR`WDSV'QA\5?%FCZO=6.GZ,;FUMY M-D4WV:Z?>N`=VY!M/)/W>*WE.46TEIZ,WE.HF[+1/^5O]3F_^%T>-O\`H`'_ M`,!+S_"I]I+^7\&3[2IV_P#)?^"'_"Z/&W_0!/\`X"7G^%'M)_R_@Q>TJ=O_ M`"7_`((?\+H\;?\`0`/_`("7G^%'M)_R_@Q^TJ=O_)?^"'_"Z/&W_0`/_@)> M?X4>TG_+^##VE3M_Y+_P31TOXJ>/=7G%M;:`@=OXI8+F)%'JSR%5`'UIJ1K>F6=I-9=1U&YB M:WNT6RMKN-AMVW,"3I+M'4*QPP4\H24/W/]W,/;]XK$?[)![T`;?B;_D$WO_7I"XL94P&?;&CF`MW#XS'G@28!PCOD`M_!KQ8?&HU' M5I(VMYWEM8KB)AC9<0VJ1RA0>0I9&M8\8>%+KQ!') M;K&]P^MVT8@D^UK'&NR`"?SM@_T)$;`AZ@#K\U`'T#X!\3)XPT&RUA2-US`I ME`_AF3Y)E]L2JV/;!H`M>-/^0!J7_8/N_P#TGDH`X+X,7L&G>`=.N[IUB@@M MYY))&.%1$GG9F)]``2:`/7XI%F19$.5F01D'GGIZT`/H`^>?C1\$5^(! M&K:2Z6^K1($97XBN47[JNP!*2IT1\$%<(^`%90#P3P9KWCOX*R/976EW5SIS MN6>!HW>-6Z,]O<1"1$+?Q#YD;J5W?-0![M9_M%6MTH`T36C-_P`\X[=9!GV8 M,I(]]@/M0!0UW5?'_P`3H6TS2=.;PUIMP-DUU>R;;AXV^\JH`)$#+D,$C)8' M;YJ@G(!Z1\,OA1IGPTMB+;-S?SJ!/=NH#,.OEQKSY<0/.T$EB`79L+M`/4J` M/FN:,^&OBVMY??+;Z[I_D6LK?=\Y%B4Q!N@8F#A>I,L8'+4`=%\;_$6K^#K" MVU31[U[9IKR&T>)HK>6/9(LK%U\R)G$@*C^,J1QM'6@#VJS@>UA6*21[AD&# M))L#N?5A&J(#_NJ!B@#P']H2/S;?0D)90VNVBY0E6&5D&58%OB)KVEWW[MM:VW]D[<"9%9V=4/\3()6!4KP1>$[C3T4 MRW6J2V]I:PKR\LKS(^U%ZDA48^V!ZB@#T3PCI,F@Z+8Z9,=TEG:00N3Z4`>L^.76/P_J18X' MV&Y'XM"Z@?4D@#U)Q0!T5JI2%%/!"*"/<`4`>#_M(C=X7B'(SJ5ITZ_\M>E` M'<#X:6-SJL&MZG1%. MMYQN3*L,PVOY4LD+,IX* M[XV5]K#(8`C(.#0!E>%O!VG>#+D++#;$Y$+SRRQH226,:RN^S<6);;C<> M3S0!KZMI<6LVSV=PTJQ2C#^3*\+%3P5WQLKA6'#`$9'!H`KZ#H5MX#7;5[&Z,JPRC#B&62%F4@@H7B97VL"0R@@, M.#0!FVGA*RL=+.AP-<+9[1&J_:9BZ1@*HBCE+^8D85=H56`"DCH30!5\)>!= M)\#H\.BI+;PRGM7L;HRB"4%9 M!%+)"SJ059&>-E;8P)#+G##@T`&BZ-!X?M4L;0RF"(`1B6628HH`545I&9@B M@`*N<#M0!!I7AVQT2XN[NRC\J34IEGN`#\K2A`A<+T4L!E\?>;+'DDD`W*`. M5O\`P9IE]>_VJJ26M^5V-:K[<#;C%`%C1/"NG^'Y M9KJT1C=7A4W%Q-))-/+LR$#R2,S;4!PJ+M11T44`:]]9K?P/;.TD:R#!:*1X MI`,Y^61"KJ>V5(.,B@#FO"G@72O!*O'HR2P12DLT37$TL6\XS($E=U$A"@%Q M@D#!H`V=AH`@\)^!]+\$1/;Z,DL$$IW&% MIYI8PW=D25W",W&XKC=@9Z4`:VN:);^(;1["\,OV>4%9%BEDA+J059&:)E8H MP)#+G##K0!P__"G_``X+`:0([H:>K;Q:B^O/(W;MQ)C\[:<9YH`] M.50@"C@`8`]A0`M`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`&'K_AK3?%%M]CU:!+F$,'4-D,CCH\; MJ5>-QV=&5O>@#%;X?:5: M`.VH`XSQ1X!TGQC)%+JRSS?9B'A5;F>)(Y%SB54BD11*,XWXW8P,T`-USX?: M/XC^QMJ*2S3:8=UKW?S()59HYH)!_'#-&RRQMTSM8 M!L`,".*`*UEX0T^TNDU"02W=Y"I2*>[E>=X5;[PB\PE8BV/F9%5V'#,1Q0!T M]`&5K6AV/B*T?3M4A2ZM9@-\<@R#@Y!!&"K`C*LI#*>00:`,2U\$6%L(TD>[ MNH8&1HH;F[GGB1HR#&=DCD/Y9`*>9O"D`CD`@`["@#C_`!7X%TKQJJ1:RDL\ M,1W+$MQ-%%O&<.4B=%9P&(5CD@$@4`=)I]BFFP):QM+(L8P&FD>60C)/S22% MG;&<`L2<8':@"Y0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4` M%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0 A`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`!0`4`%`'__9 ` end -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----