MADISON EXPLORATIONS INC.
         NEVADA INCORPORATED DIAMOND EXPLORATION COMPANY


[Madison Exploration Logo Appears Here]


December 16, 2005

United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Attention:

Dear Sirs:

Re:      Madison Explorations, Inc.
         Registration Statement on form 10 SB
         Commission File No. 0-51302

This letter is in reply to your letter of November 29, 2005.

Below is an explanation of our modifications to the original file, based on the
comments you have made. The numbering system in this letter corresponds to the
numbering system in your letters to us.



GENERAL:

     1.   With  respect to our  previous  comment 1 of our letter  dated June 9,
          2005, we note your revisions.  Please continue your revisions as there
          are still  various  areas in the document  where you discuss  Canadian
          dollars without providiing a translation to United States Dollars.

          We have now revised the entire document. Anywhere we have discussed
          Canadian dollars we have also provided a translation to United States
          dollars.

Part I
ITEM 1.  DESCRIPTION OF YOUR BUSINESS

     2.   Your  attention  is directed  to the prior  comment 1 of your June 21,
          2005 letter.  Please more fully  identify  Echo  Resources,  which was
          granted an option in your "Bulls Eye" property.  Advise how you became
          familiar  with  Echo  Resources  with whom you have  entered  into two
          significant agreements.

          We have added a description of Echo Resources, Inc. Into our filing,
          as follows:





          Echo Resources, Inc., formerly known as TVE Corporation ("Echo") is a
          Delaware corporation with its principle office located at 500
          Austrailian Avenue, West Palm Beach, FL. It has approximately 200
          shareholders, and is pubically traded on the Over the Counter Bulletin
          Board under the symbol "ECHR." Echo is engaged as a pre-exploration
          stage company with its business strategy focussing on the development
          and exploration of diamond and gold mines in Canada. Echo became aware
          of Madison through Madison's website and followup discussions
          resulting therefrom.


     3.   In the fifth paragraph on page 3, you state you signed an acquisition
          agreement on June 16, 2005. However, the agreement appears to have
          been consummated in 2004. Also, in other areas of the document you
          discuss an acquisition agreement dated June 16, 2004. Please revise
          the document to provide consistent information throughout.

          The date you refer of June 16, 2005 was in error. We signed the
          acquisition agreement on June 16, 2004. The paragraph has now been
          amended to reflect the correct date.

     4.   In the last paragraph on page three, you state "(i)f Echo Resources
          Inc. pays the $44,000...." Based on the financial statements, it
          appears that Echo has already paid the $44,000 as of December 31,
          2004. Revise the disclosure or explain to us your accounting treatment
          of $44,000.

          Echo Resources paid the $44,000 as of December 31, 2004. We have
          amended this paragraph to state the following:

         "Echo Resources has paid the $44,000 due to us. If Echo funds half of
         the proposed exploration, then it will earn a 20% interest in the
         property."

     5.   In the second paragraph on page 4 you state that you recorded the
          $50,000 received for the Bronco property interest as a deposit. Revise
          to clarify that the deposit is reflected as a liability on the balance
          sheet.

          We have revised the paragraph by adding the following sentences: "The
          deposit is reflected as a liability on the balance sheet in order to
          better match the expenses to their related revenue source. As funds
          are spent on this property, the company will bring the corresponding
          revenue amount into income. If the Company decides to abandon the
          property then any remaining deposit will be brought into income in
          that year."





          ACQUISITION AGREEMENT

     6.   Your attention is directed to prior comment 4 of our June 21, 2005
          letter, as previously requested, disclose how much Mr. Fu and Dr.
          Montgomery purchased the Scout Lake Property for and that the
          Acquisition Agreement requires Madison to loan the mine development
          costs to be borne by Dr. Montgomery and Mr. Fu.

          We have added the following dislcosure:
          Mr. Fu and Dr. Montgomery purchased the Scout Lake Property for CAD
          $7,800 or approximately USD $6,610. The Acquisition Agreement does
          require Madison to loan the mine development costs to be borne by Dr.
          Montgomery and Mr. Fu.

     7.   In the second paragraph on page 5, you discuss certain properties that
          were claimed in April 2002 and July of 2004. Revise to provide the
          names of these properties.

          All of the claims discussed in the second paragraph on page five are
          part of the "Scout Lake Property." The claims recorded in April 2002
          under numbers S-135705, S-135706, and S-135707 are the original land
          claims comprising the Scout Lake Property on which drilling activity
          occurred. These have been allowed to lapse. The claim numbers relating
          to the Scout Lake property are S-137962 and S-137963, were claimed by
          Scout Resources in July 2004.

          EXPLORATION PROGRAM

     8.   Please put the references to Fort a la Corne District and the Wood
          Mountain District in context. We understand that your focus will now
          be on the Wood Mountain District, specifically the Val Marie area.

          The following area descriptions have been added to our document in the
          section named "Exploration Program":

          "Two areas in Saskatchewan have been designated as having diamond
          discovery potential. They are the Fort a la Corne District and the
          Wood Mountain District.

          The Fort a la Corne District is the area surrounding Prince Albert in
          North-Central Saskatchewan Canada. The Fort a la Corne area of
          Saskatchewan hosts one of the most extensive kimberlite fields in the
          world. Over 70 kimberlites exist in the Fort a la Corne area and over
          70 percent of these have been shown to contain diamonds. Shore Gold
          Inc has discovered a diamond bearing kimberlite within the Fort a la
          Corne area, and is currently conducting a Pre-Feasibility Study to
          determine the commercial viability of their find.

          The Wood Mountain area an area in which high occurances of diamond
          indicator minerals have been found, similar to those at Fort a la
          Corne. The Wood Mountain area is in South-West Saskatchewan





          The Company's focus will be on properties that are in or near the Wood
          Mountain area, near the towns of Val Marie and Wideview. It is noted
          that both of these towns lie in defined Wood Mountain area."

          A Mineral Resouce Occurance Map of Saskatchewan has been included as
          supplemental information to this filing that graphically illustrates
          each of the named diamond potential areas.



     ITEM 2.  PLAN OF OPERATION

     9.   As previously requested by our prior comment 12 of our June 21, 2005
          letter, please discuss the costs associated with being a publicly
          traded company. We note your disclosure that your officers and
          directors have agreed to pay all the costs associated with being a
          public company. We note that these costs are in addition to the
          significant costs associated with your exploration projects. As
          previously requested, please discuss the consequences to investors if
          you fail to satisfy your reporting obligations.

          We have revised our disclosure to state the following:

         "The officers and directors have agreed to pay all costs and expenses
         of having us comply with the federal securities laws (and being a
         public company). We estimate that these costs will be approximately
         $20,000 per year. Our officers and directors have also agreed to pay
         the other expenses of the Company, excluding those direct costs and
         expenses of data gathering and mineral exploration, should the Company
         be unable to do so. To implement our business plan, we will need to
         secure financing for our business development. We have no source for
         funding at this time.

         If we are unable to raise additional funds to satisfy our reporting
         obligations, investors will no longer have access to current financial
         and other information about our business affairs."

     10.  With respect to your geological report furnished supplementally,
          please advise why the report is dated July 2005, a date after the
          filing of the Form 10-SB filing.

          The Geological report has a date of July 2005 as that is date in which
          the most up to date changes had been to that version of the report.

          ITEM 5.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTER AND CONTROL PERSONS

     11.  Provide supplement support for the statements that Mr. Stunder was
          awarded "International honors for technology projects under his
          direction" and that Dr. Montgomery is a recognized diamond specialist





          having worked on several diamond and mining projects around the World"
          Identify the Swiss firm for which Mr. Haskins worked as the CFO and
          Executive director.

          The following descriptions of the key directors have been modfied to
          include the following:

          "Mr. Stunder was awarded "Best Integrated Customer Relationship
          Management/Ebusiness Solution" from the Microsoft Industry Solutions
          Awards in 2000 and Internet World's "Best Canadian Recreational
          Website" in 1998. Both of these awards were achieved while Mr. Stunder
          was employed by Intrawest Corporation as the Director of Ecommerce.

          Dr. Montgomery received his Ph.D. in Geology from Queen's University
          (Ontario) and University of British Columbia in 1967. In 1968, he
          founded Montgomery consultants consulting firm engaged in mining
          exploration, property evaluation, property development, syndicate
          management, ore reserve estimates and computer application in the
          mining industry. Clients have included many major and junior mining
          companies, Canadian federal and provincial governments and United
          Nations. In 1994, Dr. Montgomery presented "Diamond Exploration in
          Canada" - An Update, for the Canadian Institute of Gemology." We have
          removed the reference to Dr. Montgomery as a recognized diamond
          specialist.

          We have disclosed that the Swiss firm for which Mr. Haskins worked as
          CFO and Executive Director was Vontobel Private Equity Management
          (Cayman) Ltd.

Financial Statements

NOTE 3 - MINERAL CLAIMS

     12.  In this footnote, you state that the company must spend certain
          amounts on exploration work by October 1, 2005 and by July 1, 2006.
          These dates do note agree to the dates of May 31, 2006 and May 31,
          2007 as disclosure in "Acquisition Agreement" on page 4 (and per the
          amended agreement dated September 1, 2005.) Please revise the footnote
          to include the most current information practicable.

          We have amended the financial statement notes to reflect the amended
          dates of May 31, 2006 and May 31, 2007.

          HERBERT ANOMALY (AKA BULLS-EYE TARGET), PAGE F-10

     13.  You State, "(a)fter six months, Echo will be required to fund 50% of
          any exporation work." Revise to disclose the date by which Echo must
          fund the exploraiton work, as noted in "Description of Business" on
          page 4. Revise to clarify if the company must refund the $44,000
          payment by Echo if they did not fund the exploration. Revise to





          disclose all material terns and conditions of the agreement in the
          notes to the financial statements.

          We have added the phrase ,,non-refundable" in front of the word
          ,,consideration" in order to clarify the nature of the payment. We
          have also included the date (February 28th) after which Echo will be
          required to fund 50% of any additional exploration.

          The amended note now reads:

          Pursuant to an agreement consummated on September 19, 2004, the
          Company sold an option for 20% interest in revenue from the mineral
          claims the Company has in the Herbert Anomaly in Saskatchewan to Echo
          Resources, Inc. ("Echo") in non-refundable consideration of $44,000.
          This is treated as a deferred income on the financial statements to be
          recognized when the expenses of the exploration occur to match
          revenues to the associated expenses.

          After February 28, 2006, Echo will be required to fund 50% any
          additional exploration work on the property to maintain its 20%
          interest. If the Company decides not to continue work on the property,
          Echo will have the first right of refusal to continue development of
          the site.



          NOTE 4 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS, PAGE F-11

     14.  In "Exploration Program" on page 5, we note your discussion of the
          fees paid to Montgomery Consultants Ltd., a related party. Revise to
          disclose the dollar amounts of all related party transactions for each
          of the periods for which statement of operations are presented, where
          material. Refer to SFAS 57.

          We have added a paragraph to Related Party notes for the financial
          statements as at December 31, 2004, June 30, 2005 and September 30,
          2005. The December 31, 2004 note now reads:

          For the year ended December 31, 2004, $12,186 of exploration and
          development expenses was paid to Montgomery Consultants, Ltd., a
          related party controlled by a director of the Company.

          INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PAGE F-1

     15.  Revise the Interim Financial statements and notes thereto to conform
          to any applicable changes to the annual financial statements. Also,
          revise the Forms 10-QSB as of June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2005 and
          the notes thereto to conform to the applicable changes to the annual
          and interim financial statements as applicable.





          As requested we will re-edgarize and re-file all documents you have
          mentioned above as a part of this amended filing.

          STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, PAGE F-2

     16.  You need only present interim financial statements for the
          year-to-date periods in a registration statement. Revise to delete the
          quarterly statements of operations for the three months ended June 30,
          2005 and 2004 and reference to the three month period in the notes to
          the financial statements. Refer to Item 310 (b) of Regulation S-B.

          These columns have now been removed in our Statement of Operations.

          STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS, PAGE F-3

     17.  You provide statement of cash flow information for the period of
          "Decemeber 3, 1998 (inception) to June 30, 2005". Revise to present
          cash flow information for the period of June 15, 1998 to June 30,
          2005, as June 15, 1998 appears to be the correct inception date.

          The column now reflects the correct date of June 15, 1998, the
          previous was an error.

          NOTE 3 - ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS, PAGE F-7

     18.  Revise your footnotes to disclose the impact the SFAS 153 will have on
          your financial position and results of operations when such standard
          is adopted. Refer to SAB Topic 11.M.

          We have added a paragraph to note 3 to read:

          In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of
          Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29" ("SFAS No.
          153"). SFAS No. 153 is based on the principle that exchanges of
          nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the
          assets exchanged. APB Opinion No. 29, "Accounting for Nonmonetary
          Transactions," provided an exception to its basic measurement
          principle (fair value) for exchanges of similar productive assets.
          Under APB Opinion No. 29, an exchange of a productive asset for a
          similar productive asset was based on the recorded amount of the asset
          relinquished. SFAS No. 153 eliminates this exception and replaces it
          with an exception of exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have
          commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 became effective for our Company as
          of July 1, 2005. The Company will apply the requirements of SFAS No.
          153 on any future nonmonetary exchange transactions and does not
          believe it will have a material impact on our consolidated financial
          statements.





          FORM 10-QSB AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2005
          GENERAL

     19.  Explain why you have included a management certification of Mr.
          Haskins, your Treasurer.

          We have removed the management certification from the Form 10QSB as of
          September 30, 2005 and June 30, 2005.

          STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, PAGE F-2

     20.  It appears that the statement of operations for the three months and
          six months ending September 30, 2004 include the activity for the
          three months and six months, ended September 30, 2005 and vice versa.
          Please revise the statements so they reflect the transactions from the
          appropriate periods.

          The statements have now been corrected with the correct period.

          PLAN OF OPERATION

     21.  Explain why you included the disclosure of new shell company rules.

          The disclosure of new shell company rules has been removed from our
          filing.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     22.  Your disclosure must conform to the requirements of Item 307 of
          Regulation S-B. Please ensure that you either include the definition
          of controls and procedures in 13a-15(b). Clarify that Mr. Haskins is
          your Chief Financial Officer.

          We have disclosed the following in our amended quarterly report on
          Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005:





          EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE ON CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

          We evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
          procedures as of September 30, 2005. This evaluation was conducted by
          Kevin Stunder, our chief executive officer and Joel Haskins, our
          chief financial officer.

          Disclosure controls are controls and other procedures that are
          designed to ensure that information that we are required to disclose
          in the reports we file pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
          is recorded, processed, summarized and reported.

          LIMITATIONS ON THE EFFECTIVE OF CONTROLS

          Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls or our
          internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error and
          fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated,
          can provide only reasonable, but no absolute, assurance that the
          objectives of a control system are met. Further, any control system
          reflects limitations on resources, and the benefits of a control
          system must be considered relative to its costs. These limitations
          also include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be
          faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or
          mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual
          acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by
          management override of a control. A design of a control system is also
          based upon certain assumptions about potential future conditions; over
          time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
          or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
          deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective
          control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may
          not be detected.

          CONCLUSIONS

          Based upon their evaluation of our controls, our chief executive
          officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, subject
          to the limitations noted above, the disclosure controls are effective
          providing reasonable assurance that material information relating to
          us is made known to management on a timely basis during the period
          when our reports are being prepared. There were no changes in our
          internal controls that occurred during the quarter covered by this
          report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
          materially affect our internal controls.

          We confirm that Mr. Haskins is our Chief Financial Officer.


Regards,


/s/ KEVIN STUNDER
__________________________
Kevin Stunder
Chief Executive Officer
Madison Explorations, Inc.