PARKE BANCORP, INC.
2016 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS
PARKE BANCORP, INC.
2016 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS
TABLE OF CONTENTS | |||
Page | |||
Section One | |||
Letter to Shareholders................................................................................................................................ | |||
Selected Financial Data.............................................................................................................................. | |||
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations...................... | |||
Market Prices and Dividends...................................................................................................................... | |||
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting......................................................... | |||
Section Two | |||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm........................................................................ | |||
Consolidated Financial Statements............................................................................................................ | |||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.............................................................................................. | |||
Officers and Corporate Information............................................................................................................ | |||
To Our Shareholders:
2016 was a memorable year for many reasons. The Presidential election will go down as one of the most fiercely contested, verbally abusive and controversial elections in the Country’s history. The election turned politics and the media upside down. Many “experts” predicted an economic collapse if the election was won by Donald Trump, which sent many businesses into a “wait and see” position, rather than proceeding with any expansion. The uncertainty of the election affected the banking industry, with some believing there would be increased regulatory scrutiny, while others thought there may be some regulatory relief depending on who was elected. Most bank stocks remained flat due to the uncertainty in the market and the M & A industry was somewhat quiet. However, to the surprise of many, the results of the election had the opposite effect on the stock market and specifically the banking industry. The stock market reached new highs and the banking industry enjoyed the “Trump Bump”. Predictions of loosening regulations and tax reductions for businesses and banking revitalized many businesses’ strategic planning, with several major companies announcing plans to expand operations in the United States rather than building abroad. These corporate announcements promised thousands of jobs staying and expanding in the United States. The promise of the repeal or amendment of the Dodd-Frank Act generated optimism that banks would be able to better serve their communities and lessen the cost of some of the current regulatory requirements which would equate to increased profits. Time will tell if the optimism is unfounded or if there will be a new expansion of the economy and the banking industry. There have only been a few new bank charters issued since the financial crisis and reports indicate that there are currently 8 new bank charters pending with the FDIC.
We worked through the many challenges of 2016 and it became a record year for Parke Bancorp. We achieved our fourth straight year of record earnings, opened two new full service branches and we reached one billion dollars in total assets. We opened our Collingswood branch in September. It has far exceeded our expectations for growth and already has over $20mm in deposits. Our Chinatown office opened in December and is off to a great start with deposits and loans. We believe these two new branches have enhanced our franchise value as a Philadelphia area bank, and now one of the few local community banks that is over a billion dollars in assets. This growth puts us in a great position to take advantage of the continued strength of the Philadelphia area market and the very strong growth of the Asian community.
Parke Bancorp generated net income of $17.3 million, an increase of 82.3% over year ended December 31, 2015. The Company’s return on average assets was 1.97% and our return on average equity was 17.04%. Earnings per share increased to $2.53 per common share and $2.06 per diluted common share, a 69.3% increase over year ended December 31, 2015. Shareholders’ Equity increased 13.5% in 2016 to $127.1 million. There were several key factors supporting our growth in net income, including the sale of our SBA Subsidiary for a substantial profit. If you exclude the profit from the sale of this company, our Bank would still have recorded our fourth straight year of record profits, representing continued strong growth of our operating earnings. The sale of our SBA Subsidiary included the sale of our SBA loan portfolio, which was a condition of the purchase. SBA protocol requires an SBA lender to forfeit their authorization to generate SBA loans if their SBA loan portfolio was sold. In an unprecedented decision, the SBA granted Parke Bank the approval to continue generating SBA loans, which is a critical part of serving our communities with small business loans. Another important factor supporting the Bank’s profitability was our strong loan growth. Our loan portfolio grew 12.3% in 2016 and that was after selling our $42.6mm SBA loan portfolio. We continue to be one of the leaders in our peer group on managing expenses. Our cost efficiency ratio was 45.64% in 2016. These factors combined, contributed to our strong earnings in 2016.
We continue to focus on reducing our NPAs (nonperforming loans plus Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) properties). In 2016 our Nonperforming loans decreased 16.7% to $11.3 million as of December 31, 2016. OREO decreased 36.7% in 2016 to $10.5 million as of December 31, 2016. Although these are substantial reductions, we remain focused on continuing to reduce our NPAs. It is again important to note that we remain committed to reducing our NPAs without sacrificing shareholder value.
Only time will tell if the current regulatory and business environment will change. Hopefully, the current Administration will address the increased residential mortgage lending regulations that have eliminated so many community banks from offering residential mortgages, which has reduced the options available to consumers. There are also many
1
reports stating that several compliance and current reporting requirements will be addressed, specifically as they pertain to community banking. Community banking continues to be the cornerstone of small business lending. The cost of these increased regulations to the community banking industry is millions of dollars annually and has in many instances restricted community banks’ ability to provide needed capital to small businesses.
2017 will be another exciting year at Parke Bancorp. We will continue to focus our marketing efforts on growing the new Collingswood and Chinatown branches, in addition to growing our existing branch network. Our ability to offer SBA loans to the small businesses in our communities will also play a key role in our growth, in addition to expanding our Asian lending with the new Chinatown branch. The addition of two branches includes increased costs, however, we remain committed to disciplined control of the Bank’s expenses. The Bank’s record profits, control of expenses and reaching $1 billion dollars in total assets supported the Board of Directors’ decision to approve a 31% increase in our cash dividend in 2016. Parke Bancorp is well positioned in the marketplace with strong earnings, substantial capital and a growing footprint. There will be market opportunities in the future and Parke Bancorp is well positioned to take advantage of those opportunities. We appreciate the strong support of our shareholders and we will continue to work very hard to enhance your investment in our Company.
/s/ C.R. Pennoni | /s/ Vito S. Pantione | |
C.R. “Chuck” Pennoni | Vito S. Pantilione | |
Chairman | President and Chief Executive Officer | |
2
Selected Financial Data At or for the Year Ended December, 31 | |||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets | $ | 1,016,185 | $ | 885,124 | $ | 821,706 | $ | 794,943 | $ | 770,477 | |||||||||
Loans, Net | $ | 836,373 | $ | 742,365 | $ | 695,018 | $ | 635,981 | $ | 610,776 | |||||||||
Securities Available for Sale | $ | 44,854 | $ | 42,567 | $ | 28,208 | $ | 35,695 | $ | 19,340 | |||||||||
Securities Held to Maturity | $ | 2,224 | $ | 2,181 | $ | 2,141 | $ | 2,103 | $ | 2,066 | |||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | $ | 70,720 | $ | 27,429 | $ | 36,238 | $ | 45,661 | $ | 76,866 | |||||||||
OREO | $ | 10,528 | $ | 16,629 | $ | 20,931 | $ | 28,910 | $ | 26,057 | |||||||||
Deposits | $ | 788,694 | $ | 665,210 | $ | 647,933 | $ | 626,768 | $ | 637,207 | |||||||||
Borrowings | $ | 93,053 | $ | 98,053 | $ | 62,755 | $ | 68,683 | $ | 43,851 | |||||||||
Shareholders' Equity | $ | 127,134 | $ | 112,040 | $ | 102,905 | $ | 93,716 | $ | 83,637 | |||||||||
Operational Data: (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest Income | $ | 42,202 | $ | 39,410 | $ | 38,132 | $ | 36,784 | $ | 37,746 | |||||||||
Interest Expense | 6,764 | 5,812 | 5,579 | 5,795 | 7,424 | ||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income | 35,438 | 33,598 | 32,553 | 30,989 | 30,322 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for Loan Losses | 1,462 | 3,040 | 3,250 | 2,700 | 7,300 | ||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses | 33,976 | 30,558 | 29,303 | 28,289 | 23,022 | ||||||||||||||
Noninterest Income | 10,290 | 5,080 | 7,631 | 3,426 | 4,368 | ||||||||||||||
Noninterest Expense | 16,628 | 16,852 | 18,911 | 18,852 | 15,079 | ||||||||||||||
Income Before Income Tax Expense | 27,638 | 18,786 | 18,023 | 12,863 | 12,311 | ||||||||||||||
Income Tax Expense | 8,695 | 6,843 | 5,711 | 3,625 | 4,242 | ||||||||||||||
Net Income Attributable to Company and Noncontrolling Interest | 18,943 | 11,943 | 12,312 | 9,238 | 8,069 | ||||||||||||||
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest | (433 | ) | (1,246 | ) | (1,839 | ) | (1,667 | ) | (756 | ) | |||||||||
Discount on Retirement of Preferred Shares | — | — | — | 1,948 | — | ||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock Dividend and Discount Accretion | 1,200 | 1,200 | 1,200 | 1,058 | 1,012 | ||||||||||||||
Net Income Available to Common Shareholders | 17,310 | $ | 9,497 | $ | 9,273 | $ | 8,461 | $ | 6,301 | ||||||||||
Per Share Data: 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Basic Earnings per Common Share | 2.53 | $ | 1.42 | $ | 1.41 | $ | 1.29 | $ | 1.06 | ||||||||||
Diluted Earnings per Common Share | 2.06 | $ | 1.22 | $ | 1.06 | $ | 1.29 | $ | 1.06 | ||||||||||
Book Value per Common Share | 15.87 | $ | 12.42 | $ | 12.29 | $ | 11.42 | $ | 11.36 | ||||||||||
Performance Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||
Return on Average Assets | 1.97 | % | 1.25 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.01 | % | 0.94 | % | |||||||||
Return on Average Common Equity | 17.04 | % | 10.82 | % | 11.77 | % | 12.04 | % | 9.70 | % | |||||||||
Net Interest Margin | 3.96 | % | 4.14 | % | 4.33 | % | 4.36 | % | 4.12 | % | |||||||||
Efficiency Ratio | 45.64 | % | 43.57 | % | 47.06 | % | 54.78 | % | 43.12 | % | |||||||||
Capital Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity to Assets | 12.51 | % | 12.68 | % | 12.53 | % | 11.64 | % | 10.84 | % | |||||||||
Dividend Payout | 13.44 | % | 16.90 | % | 6.46 | % | — | — | |||||||||||
Tier 1 Risk-based Capital2 | 16.67 | % | 15.87 | % | 15.97 | % | 15.65 | % | 14.99 | % | |||||||||
Total Risk-based Capital2 | 17.93 | % | 17.13 | % | 17.22 | % | 16.92 | % | 16.26 | % | |||||||||
Asset Quality Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||
Nonperforming Loans/Total Loans | 1.33 | % | 1.79 | % | 3.77 | % | 5.49 | % | 7.55 | % | |||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses/Total Loans | 1.83 | % | 2.13 | % | 2.53 | % | 2.84 | % | 3.01 | % | |||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses/Non-performing Loans | 137.90 | % | 119.01 | % | 67.09 | % | 51.62 | % | 39.82 | % | |||||||||
1 Per share computations give retroactive effect to stock dividends declared in each of 2012, 2013 and 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||
2 Capital ratios for Parke Bank | |||||||||||||||||||
3
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward Looking Statements
Parke Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) may from time to time make written or oral "forward‑looking statements", including statements contained in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (including the Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10‑K, including the exhibits), in its reports to stockholders and in other communications by the Company, which are made in good faith by the Company.
These forward‑looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of the Company's plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions, which are subject to change based on various important factors (some of which are beyond the Company's control). The following factors, among others, could cause the Company's financial performance to differ materially from the plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions expressed in such forward‑looking statements: the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which Parke Bank (the “Bank”) conducts operations; the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, inflation, interest rates, market and monetary fluctuations; the timely development of and acceptance of new products and services of the Bank and the perceived overall value of these products and services by users, including the features, pricing and quality compared to competitors' products and services; the impact of changes in financial services' laws and regulations (including laws concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance); technological changes; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; and the success of the Bank at managing the risks resulting from these factors. The Company cautions that the listed factors are not exclusive.
Overview
The Company's results of operations are dependent primarily on the its net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on its interest‑earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the interest expense paid on its interest‑bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. The Company also generates noninterest income such as service charges, Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”) income, gains on sales of loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) and other fees. The Company's noninterest expenses primarily consist of employee compensation and benefits, occupancy expenses, marketing expenses, professional services, FDIC insurance assessments, data processing costs and other operating expenses. The Company is also subject to losses from its loan portfolio if borrowers fail to meet their obligations. The Company's results of operations are also significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory agencies.
Results of Operation
The Company recorded net income available to common shareholders of $17.3 million, or $2.06 per diluted share, and $9.5 million, or $1.22 per diluted share, for 2016 and 2015, respectively. Pre-tax earnings amounted to $27.6 million for 2016 and $18.8 million for 2015.
On April 29, 2016, the Bank and its majority-owned subsidiary, 44 Business Capital, LLC ("44BC") completed the sale transaction of the assets of 44BC and certain related assets held by the Bank to Berkshire Bank ("Berkshire"). Under the transaction, Berkshire purchased the assets of 44BC. In addition, Berkshire purchased the Bank's SBA loan portfolio, totaling $42.6 million, and related servicing rights held by the Bank. The after-tax gain to the Bank was approximately $5.9 million.
On April 29, 2016, the Bank and its majority-owned subsidiary, 44 Business Capital, LLC ("44BC") completed the sale transaction of the assets of 44BC and certain related assets held by the Bank to Berkshire Bank ("Berkshire"). Under the transaction, Berkshire purchased the assets of 44BC. In addition, Berkshire purchased the Bank's SBA loan portfolio, totaling $42.6 million, and related servicing rights held by the Bank. The pre-tax gain to the Bank was approximately $9.3 million, which includes the $7.6 million gain on sale of SBA related assets and relief of $1.7 million of related allowance for loan losses.
Total assets of $1.0 billion at December 31, 2016 represented an increase of $131.1 million, or 14.8%, from December 31, 2015. Total gross loans amounted to $852.0 million at year end 2016 for an increase of $93.5 million, or 12.3%
4
from December 31, 2015. Deposits increased by $123.5 million, an increase of 18.6%. Total shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2016 amounted to $127.1 million and increased $15.1 million, or 13.5%, during the past year.
The principal objective of this financial review is to provide a discussion and an overview of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements and related notes thereto.
Comparative Average Balances, Yields and Rates. The following table sets forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information for the periods indicated. Interest rate spread is the difference between the average yield earned on interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average earning assets. All average balances are daily average balances. Nonaccrual loans were included in the computation of average balances, and have been reflected in the table as loans carrying a zero yield. The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or expense.
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average Balance | Interest Income/ Expense | Yield/ Cost | Average Balance | Interest Income/ Expense | Yield/ Cost | ||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands except Yield/ Cost data) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | $ | 800,677 | $ | 40,740 | 5.09 | % | $ | 731,032 | $ | 38,035 | 5.20 | % | |||||||||
Investment securities | 46,782 | 1,245 | 2.66 | % | 47,323 | 1,296 | 2.74 | % | |||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and cash equivalents | 46,791 | 217 | 0.46 | % | 33,184 | 79 | 0.24 | % | |||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets | 894,250 | $ | 42,202 | 4.72 | % | 811,539 | $ | 39,410 | 4.86 | % | |||||||||||
Noninterest earning assets | 61,735 | 59,545 | |||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (15,534 | ) | (17,243 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 940,451 | $ | 853,841 | |||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing deposits | |||||||||||||||||||||
NOWs | $ | 32,499 | $ | 163 | 0.50 | % | $ | 31,318 | $ | 154 | 0.49 | % | |||||||||
Money markets | 123,017 | 625 | 0.51 | % | 112,180 | 559 | 0.50 | % | |||||||||||||
Savings | 175,163 | 931 | 0.53 | % | 188,392 | 1,006 | 0.53 | % | |||||||||||||
Time deposits | 284,018 | 3,319 | 1.17 | % | 251,816 | 2,836 | 1.13 | % | |||||||||||||
Brokered certificates of deposit | 45,961 | 380 | 0.83 | % | 30,337 | 189 | 0.62 | % | |||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | 660,658 | 5,418 | 0.82 | % | 614,043 | 4,744 | 0.77 | % | |||||||||||||
Borrowings | 90,048 | 1,346 | 1.49 | % | 80,729 | 1,068 | 1.32 | % | |||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities | 750,706 | $ | 6,764 | 0.90 | % | 694,772 | $ | 5,812 | 0.84 | % | |||||||||||
Noninterest bearing deposits | 62,483 | 45,656 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 5,656 | 5,319 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | 818,845 | 745,747 | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity | 121,606 | 108,094 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 940,451 | $ | 853,841 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 35,438 | $ | 33,598 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest rate spread | 3.82 | % | 4.02 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin | 3.96 | % | 4.14 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Rate/Volume Analysis. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (i) changes in volume (i.e., changes in volume multiplied by the previous rate) and (ii) changes in rate (i.e., changes in rate multiplied by old volume). For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to rate.
5
Years ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 vs 2015 | 2015 vs 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Variance due to change in | Variance due to change in | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Increase/ (Decrease) | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Increase/ (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Income: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (net of deferred costs/fees) | $ | 3,559 | $ | (854 | ) | $ | 2,705 | $ | 3,262 | $ | (2,194 | ) | $ | 1,068 | |||||||||
Investment securities | (15 | ) | (36 | ) | (51 | ) | 306 | (64 | ) | 242 | |||||||||||||
Federal funds sold | 41 | 97 | 138 | (32 | ) | — | (32 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total interest income | 3,585 | (793 | ) | 2,792 | 3,536 | (2,258 | ) | 1,278 | |||||||||||||||
Interest Expense: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | 348 | 326 | 674 | 101 | (103 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Borrowed funds | 130 | 148 | 278 | 238 | (3 | ) | 235 | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest expense | 478 | 474 | 952 | 339 | (106 | ) | 233 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 3,107 | $ | (1,267 | ) | $ | 1,840 | $ | 3,197 | $ | (2,152 | ) | $ | 1,045 | |||||||||
Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
The following represents summarized unaudited quarterly financial data of the Company which, in the opinion of management, reflects adjustments (comprised only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for fair presentation.
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | September 30, | June 30, | March 31, | ||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) | |||||||||||||||
2016 | |||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 11,017 | $ | 10,371 | $ | 10,471 | $ | 10,343 | |||||||
Interest expense | 1,762 | 1,697 | 1,714 | 1,591 | |||||||||||
Net interest income | 9,255 | 8,674 | 8,757 | 8,752 | |||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 700 | 700 | (638 | ) | 700 | ||||||||||
Income before income tax expense | 5,302 | 3,927 | 13,874 | 4,535 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | 1,944 | 51 | 5,154 | 1,546 | |||||||||||
Net income | 3,377 | 3,876 | 8,648 | 2,609 | |||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | |||||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders | 3,077 | 3,576 | 8,348 | 2,309 | |||||||||||
Net income per common share: | |||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 1.20 | $ | 0.36 | |||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.95 | $ | 0.31 | |||||||
2015 | |||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 10,159 | $ | 9,918 | $ | 9,933 | $ | 9,400 | |||||||
Interest expense | 1,493 | 1,501 | 1,474 | 1,344 | |||||||||||
Net interest income | 8,666 | 8,417 | 8,459 | 8,056 | |||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | — | 1,450 | 750 | 840 | |||||||||||
Income before income tax expense | 5,698 | 4,658 | 4,303 | 4,127 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | 2,204 | 1,730 | 1,388 | 1,521 | |||||||||||
Net income | 3,246 | 2,430 | 2,522 | 2,499 | |||||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders | 300 | 300 | 300 | 300 | |||||||||||
Net income per common share: | 2,946 | 2,130 | 2,222 | 2,199 | |||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.37 | |||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.31 | |||||||
6
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Allowance for Losses on Loans. The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses. Loans that are determined to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance account, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. When evaluating the adequacy of the allowance, an assessment of the loan portfolio will typically include changes in the composition and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality and past loss experience, review of specific problem loans, current economic conditions which may affect borrowers' ability to repay, and other factors which may warrant current recognition. Such periodic assessments may, in management's judgment, require the Company to recognize additions or reductions to the allowance.
Various regulatory agencies periodically review the adequacy of the Company’s allowance for loan losses as an integral part of their examination process. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions or reductions to the allowance based on their evaluation of information available to them at the time of their examination. It is reasonably possible that the above factors may change significantly and, therefore, affect management’s determination of the allowance for loan losses in the near term.
Valuation of Investment Securities. Available for sale securities are reported at fair market value with unrealized gains and losses reported, net of deferred taxes, as comprehensive income, a component of shareholders’ equity. The held to maturity securities portfolio, consisting of debt securities for which there is a positive intent and ability to hold to maturity, is carried at amortized cost. Management conducts a quarterly review and evaluation of the securities portfolio to determine if the value of any security has declined below its cost or amortized cost, and whether such decline is other than temporary. If such decline is deemed other than temporary, the cost basis of the security is adjusted by writing down the security to estimated fair market value through a charge to current period earnings to the extent that such decline is credit related.
Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”). OREO consists of real estate properties which are recorded at fair value. All properties have an independent third-party full appraisal to determine the value, less cost to sell (a range of 5% to 10%) and other costs. The appraisal is based on an "as-is" valuation and will follow a reasonable valuation method that addresses the direct sales comparison, income, and cost approaches to market value, reconciles those approaches, and explains the elimination of each approach not used. Appraisals are updated every 12 months or sooner if we have identified possible further deterioration in value.
Income Taxes. Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the difference between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of the deferred tax assets, will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income in the future.
When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that ultimately would be sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. The evaluation of a tax position taken is considered by itself and not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured, as described above, is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheet along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.
Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
Net Interest Income. The Company’s primary source of earnings is net interest income, which is the difference between income earned on interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities, and interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. The level of net interest income is determined primarily
7
by the average level of balances (“volume”) and the market rates associated with the interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
Net interest income increased $1.8 million, or 5.5%, to $35.4 million for 2016, from $33.6 million for 2015. We experienced a decrease in our interest rate spread of 20 basis points, to 3.82% for 2016, from 4.02% for 2015. Our net interest margin decreased 18 basis points, to 3.96% for 2016, from 4.14% for 2015. The increase in net interest income is primarily attributable to the combined effects of an increase in the average balance of loans, partially offset by lower yields on loans.
Interest income increased $2.8 million, or 7.1%, to $42.2 million for 2016, from $39.4 million for 2015. The increase is primarily attributable to higher loan volumes partially offset by lower yields on loans. Average loans for the year were $800.7 million compared to $731.0 million for 2015, while average loan yields were 5.09% for 2016 compared to 5.20% for 2015.
Interest expense increased $952,000, or 16.4%, to $6.8 million for 2016, from $5.8 million for 2015. The increase is primarily attributable to higher deposit and borrowing volumes and an increase in the cost of funds. Average deposits for 2016 were $660.7 million compared to $614.0 million for 2015, while average deposit rates were 0.82% for 2016 compared to 0.77% for 2015. Average borrowings outstanding increased $9.3 million to $90.0 million in 2016 as compared to $80.7 million in 2015. The average rate paid on these borrowings increased to 1.49% from 1.32% in 2015.
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income is principally derived from gains on the sale of SBA loans, service fees on deposit accounts, fee income from loan services and BOLI income. Noninterest income totaled $10.3 million in 2016 versus $5.1 million in 2015. Included in noninterest income is the $7.6 million gain on sale of SBA related assets discussed previously.
The Company recognized $1.8 million in gains from the sale of the guaranteed portion of SBA loans in 2016, compared to a gain of $4.1 million in 2015. The decrease is attributable to the sale of the Company’s SBA related assets in April of 2016.
Loan fees were $777,000 in 2016, a decrease from $1.4 million in 2015. Loan fees consist primarily of prepayment fees. These loan fees are variable in nature and are dependent upon the borrowers’ course of action.
The loss on the sale and write down of OREO for 2016 was $1.8 million, compared to a loss of $2.0 million in 2015.
BOLI income was $722,000 in 2016, an increase from $357,000 in 2016. The increase is attributable to an additional BOLI purchase in December of 2015.
Other noninterest income, which includes ATM fees, debit card fees, early CD withdrawal penalties, rental income and other miscellaneous income, amounted to $876,000 in 2016 and $918,000 in 2015.
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense for 2016 was $16.6 million, a decrease of $224,000 from 2015.
Compensation and benefits expense for 2016 was $7.3 million, a decrease of $395,000 over 2015. The decrease is attributable to the sale of the Company’s SBA related assets in April of 2016, partially offset by routine salary increases, higher benefits expense and increased staffing in other areas.
Occupancy and equipment and data processing expenses increased by $164,000 from 2015. The increase was due to the opening of two new retail branches in the second half of 2016.
OREO expenses decreased to $1.0 million in 2016, from $1.6 million in 2015. The expenses are related to the carrying costs of OREO including property taxes, insurance and maintenance. The decrease is attributable to the reduction in the balance of OREO.
Other operating expense increased to $4.1 million in 2016, from $3.4 million in 2015. Other operating expense is primarily related to nonperforming loans, including force-placed insurance and payment of real estate taxes to protect the Bank’s lien position.
8
Income Taxes. Income tax expense amounted to $8.7 million for 2016, compared to $6.8 million for 2015, resulting in effective tax rates of 31.5% and 36.4% for the respective years. The decrease in the effective rate in 2016 is due to the Company utilizing a $1.5 million Historic Tax Credit which reduced its income tax expense.
Financial Condition at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015
At December 31, 2016, the Company’s total assets increased to $1.0 billion from $885.1 million at December 31, 2015, an increase of $131.1 million or 14.8%.
Cash and cash equivalents increased $43.3 million to $70.7 million at December 31, 2016 from $27.4 million at December 31, 2015. The increase is attributable to growth in deposits and the cash generated from the sale of the Company’s SBA related assets.
Total investment securities increased to $47.1 million at December 31, 2016 ($44.9 million classified as available for sale or 95.3%) from $44.7 million at December 31, 2015, an increase of $2.3 million or 5.2%. During 2016, the Company purchased $10.0 million of mortgage-backed securities to bolster on-balance sheet liquidity to fund future growth. The purchase was funded with borrowings from the FHLB.
Total gross loans increased to $852.0 million at December 31, 2016, from $758.5 million at December 31, 2015, an increase of $93.5 million or 12.3%.
OREO at December 31, 2016 was $10.5 million, compared to $16.6 million at December 31, 2015, a decrease of $6.1 million. OREO consisted of 16 properties, the largest being a condominium development in Absecon. The decrease was primarily due to the sale of OREO property.
At December 31, 2016, the Bank’s total deposits increased to $788.7 million from $665.2 million at December 31, 2015, an increase of $123.5 million or 18.6%. Noninterest bearing deposits increased $40.0 million, or 75.3%, to $92.5 million at December 31, 2016, from $52.8 million at December 31, 2015. The increase in deposits is attributable to the opening of two retail branches in the second half of 2016 and a successful new deposit account promotion.
Borrowings decreased to $93.1 million at December 31, 2016 from $98.1 million at December 31, 2015, a decrease of $5.0 million or 5.1%.
Total shareholders’ equity increased to $127.1 million at December 31, 2016 from $112.0 million at December 31, 2015, an increase of $15.1 million or 13.5%, due to the retention of earnings.
Asset Quality
The Company attempts to manage the risk characteristics of its loan portfolio through various control processes, such as credit evaluations of borrowers, establishment of lending limits and application of lending procedures, including the holding of adequate collateral and the maintenance of compensating balances. However, the Company seeks to rely primarily on the cash flow of its borrowers as the principal source of repayment. Although credit policies are designed to minimize risk, management recognizes that loan losses will occur and the amount of these losses will fluctuate depending on the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio as well as general and regional economic conditions.
The allowance for loan losses represents a reserve for losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is evaluated periodically based on a review of all significant loans, with a particular emphasis on nonaccrual loans, past due and other loans that management believes require special attention.
For significant problem loans, management's review consists of an evaluation of the financial strengths of the borrower and the guarantor, the related collateral, and the effects of economic conditions. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans include loans identified as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial loans in order to establish specific reserves by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. General reserves against the remaining loan portfolio are based on an analysis of historical loan loss ratios, changes in the composition and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, current
9
national and local economic conditions which may affect borrowers' ability to repay, and other factors which may warrant current recognition.
Delinquent loans decreased $2.2 million to $12.6 million, or 1.5% of total loans, at December 31, 2016, from $14.8 million, or 2.0% of total loans, at December 31, 2015. Delinquent loan balances by number of days delinquent at December 31, 2016 were: 31 to 89 days --- $1.3 million and 90 days and greater --- $11.3 million. Loans 90 days and more past due are no longer accruing interest. December 31, 2015 delinquent loan balances by number of days were: 31 to 89 days --- $1.2 million and 90 days and greater --- $13.6 million. The improving credit quality of the portfolio is attributable to our ability to work out troubled loans and an improving economy.
At December 31, 2016, the Company had $11.3 million in nonperforming loans, or 1.3% of total loans, a decrease from $13.6 million, or 1.8% of total loans, at December 31, 2015. The three largest relationships in nonperforming loans are a $2.1 million land development loan, a $1.9 million commercial real estate loan and a $1.9 million land development loan.
At December 31, 2016, the Company had $21.8 million in nonperforming assets, which includes $11.3 million of nonperforming loans and $10.5 million of OREO, or 2.2% of total assets, a decrease from $30.2 million, or 3.4% of total assets at December 31, 2015.
At December 31, 2016, the Company had $36.4 million in loans deemed impaired, a decrease from $42.2 million at December 31, 2015. Included in impaired loans are TDRs that were in compliance with their modified terms and therefore are accruing, totaling $25.1 million and $28.7 million at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
The provision for loan losses is a charge to earnings in the current year to maintain the allowance at a level management has determined to be adequate based upon the factors noted above. The provision for loan losses amounted to $1.5 million for 2016, compared to $3.0 million for 2015. The decline is attributable to the sale of SBA loans, relieving the allowance for loan losses by $1.7 million. Net loan charge-offs/recoveries were $2.0 million in 2016 and $4.9 million in 2015.
At December 31, 2016, the Company’s allowance for loan losses decreased to $15.6 million, from $16.1 million at December 31, 2015, a decrease of $556,000 or 3.4%. The ratio of the allowance for loan loss to total loans decreased to 1.8% of loans at December 31, 2016, from 2.1% of loans at December 31, 2015. The allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans coverage ratio increased to 137.9% at December 31, 2016, from 119.0% at December 31, 2015.
We believe we have appropriately established adequate loss reserves on problem loans that we have identified and to cover credit risks that are inherent in the portfolio as of December 31, 2016. We continue to aggressively manage all loan relationships. Credit monitoring and tracking systems are established. Updated appraisals are being obtained, where appropriate, to ensure that collateral values are sufficient to cover outstanding loan balances. Where necessary, we will apply our loan work-out experience to protect our collateral position and actively negotiate with borrowers to resolve these nonperforming loans.
Interest Rate Sensitivity and Liquidity
Interest rate sensitivity is an important factor in the management of the composition and maturity configurations of earning assets and funding sources. The primary objective of asset/liability management is to ensure the steady growth of our primary earnings component, net interest income. Net interest income can fluctuate with significant interest rate movements. To lessen the impact of interest rate movements, management endeavors to structure the balance sheet so that repricing opportunities exist for both assets and liabilities in roughly equivalent amounts at approximately the same time intervals. Imbalances in these repricing opportunities at any point in time constitute interest rate sensitivity.
The measurement of our interest rate sensitivity, or "gap," is one of the principal techniques used in asset/liability management. Interest sensitive gap is the dollar difference between assets and liabilities that are subject to interest-rate pricing within a given time period, including both floating rate or adjustable rate instruments and instruments that are approaching maturity.
Our management and the Board of Directors oversee the asset/liability management function through the asset/liability committee of the Board that meets periodically to monitor and manage the balance sheet, control interest rate exposure, and evaluate our pricing strategies. The asset mix of the balance sheet is continually evaluated in terms of several
10
variables: yield, credit quality, appropriate funding sources and liquidity. Management of the liability mix of the balance sheet focuses on expanding the various funding sources.
In theory, interest rate risk can be diminished by maintaining a nominal level of interest rate sensitivity. In practice, this is made difficult by a number of factors, including cyclical variation in loan demand, different impacts on interest-sensitive assets and liabilities when interest rates change, and the availability of funding sources. Accordingly, we undertake to manage the interest-rate sensitivity gap by adjusting the maturity of and establishing rates on the earning asset portfolio and certain interest-bearing liabilities commensurate with management's expectations relative to market interest rates. Management generally attempts to maintain a balance between rate-sensitive assets and liabilities as the exposure period is lengthened to minimize our overall interest rate risk.
Rate Sensitivity Analysis. The interest rate sensitivity position as of December 31, 2016, is presented in the following table. Assets and liabilities are scheduled based on maturity or re-pricing data except for mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, which are based on prevailing prepayment assumptions and expected maturities and deposits which are based on recent retention experience of core deposits. The difference between rate-sensitive assets and rate-sensitive liabilities, or the interest rate sensitivity gap, is shown at the bottom of the table. As of December 31, 2016, our interest sensitive liabilities exceeded interest sensitive assets within a one year period by $100.1 million, or 57.3%, of total assets.
As of December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
3 Months or Less | Over 3 Months Through 12 Months | Over 1 Year Through 3 Years | Over 3 Years Through 5 Years | Over 5 Years Through 10 Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | $ | 83,460 | $ | 139,688 | $ | 286,083 | $ | 201,527 | $ | 130,451 | $ | 841,209 | |||||||||||
Investment securities | 1,958 | 3,907 | 9,691 | 7,553 | 23,969 | 47,078 | |||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and cash equivalents | 66,321 | — | — | — | — | 66,321 | |||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets | $ | 151,739 | $ | 143,595 | $ | 295,774 | $ | 209,080 | $ | 154,420 | $ | 954,608 | |||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Regular savings deposits | $ | 8,712 | $ | 26,136 | $ | 69,696 | $ | 62,629 | $ | 14,430 | $ | 181,603 | |||||||||||
NOW and money market deposits | 10,209 | 30,737 | 79,828 | 47,540 | 3,575 | 171,889 | |||||||||||||||||
Retail time deposits | 48,553 | 166,942 | 61,748 | 14,174 | 21 | 291,438 | |||||||||||||||||
Brokered time deposits | 36,228 | 15,001 | — | — | — | 51,229 | |||||||||||||||||
Borrowed funds | 40,903 | 12,000 | 34,150 | 6,000 | — | 93,053 | |||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 144,605 | $ | 250,816 | $ | 245,422 | $ | 130,343 | $ | 18,026 | $ | 789,212 | |||||||||||
Interest rate sensitive gap | $ | 7,134 | $ | (107,221 | ) | $ | 50,352 | $ | 78,737 | $ | 136,394 | $ | 165,396 | ||||||||||
Cumulative interest rate gap | $ | 7,134 | $ | (100,087 | ) | $ | (49,735 | ) | $ | 29,002 | $ | 165,396 | $ | — | |||||||||
Ratio of rate-sensitive assets to rate-sensitive liabilities | 104.93 | % | 57.25 | % | 120.52 | % | 160.41 | % | 856.65 | % | 116.09 | % | |||||||||||
Liquidity describes our ability to meet the financial obligations that arise out of the ordinary course of business. Liquidity addresses the Company's ability to meet deposit withdrawals on demand or at contractual maturity, to repay borrowings as they mature, and to fund current and planned expenditures. Liquidity is derived from increased repayment and income from earning assets. Our loan to deposit ratio was 108.0% and 114.0% at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Funds received from new and existing depositors provided a large source of liquidity during 2016 and 2015. The Company seeks to rely primarily on core deposits from customers to provide stable and cost-effective sources of funding to support loan growth. The Bank also seeks to augment such deposits with longer term and higher yielding certificates of deposit.
Brokered deposits are a more volatile source of funding than core deposits and do not increase the deposit franchise of the Bank. In a rising rate environment, the Bank may be unwilling or unable to pay a competitive rate. To the extent that such deposits do not remain with the Bank, they may need to be replaced with borrowings which could increase the Bank’s cost of funds and negatively impact its interest rate spread, financial condition and results of operation. To
11
mitigate the potential negative impact associated with brokered deposits, the Bank joined Promontory Inter Financial Network to secure an additional alternative funding source. Promontory provides the Bank an additional source of external funds through their weekly CDARS® settlement process. The rates are comparable to brokered deposits and can be obtained within a shorter period time than brokered deposits. The Bank’s CDARS deposits included within the brokered deposit total amounted to $51.2 million and $20.9 million at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. To the extent that retail deposits are not adequate to fund customer loan demand, liquidity needs can be met in the short term funds market. Longer term funding requirements can be obtained through advances from the FHLBNY. As of December 31, 2016, the Bank maintained unused lines of credit with the FHLBNY totaling $64.5 million.
As of December 31, 2016, the Bank's investment securities portfolio included $43.7 million of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt securities that provide additional cash flow each month. The majority of the investment portfolio is classified as available for sale, is readily marketable, and is available to meet liquidity needs. The Bank's residential real estate portfolio includes loans, which are underwritten to secondary market criteria, and provide an additional source of liquidity. Presently the residential mortgage loan portfolio and certain qualifying commercial real estate loans are pledged under a blanket lien to the FHLBNY as collateral. Management is not aware of any known trends, demands, commitments or uncertainties that are reasonably likely to result in material changes in liquidity.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of the Bank's involvement in these particular classes of financial instruments. The Bank's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual or notional amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as they do for on-balance sheet instruments.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer's credit-worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary upon the extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment and income-producing commercial properties. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, commitments to extend credit amounted to approximately $78.3 million and $62.7 million, respectively.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, standby letters of credit with customers were $13.1 million and $14.2 million, respectively.
Loan commitments and standby letters of credit are issued in the ordinary course of business to meet customer needs. Commitments to fund fixed-rate loans were immaterial at December 31, 2016. Variable-rate commitments are generally issued for less than one year and carry market rates of interest. Such instruments are not likely to be affected by annual rate caps triggered by rising interest rates. Management believes that off-balance sheet risk is not material to the results of operations or financial condition.
12
The following table sets forth information regarding the Bank’s contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2016.
Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||||||
Less than 1 year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years | Total | |||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Retail time deposits | $ | 215,495 | $ | 61,748 | $ | 14,174 | $ | 21 | $ | 291,438 | |||||||||
Brokered time deposits | 51,229 | — | — | — | 51,229 | ||||||||||||||
Borrowed funds | 52,903 | 34,150 | 6,000 | — | 93,053 | ||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | 293 | 909 | 268 | 486 | 1,956 | ||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations | $ | 319,920 | $ | 96,807 | $ | 20,442 | $ | 507 | $ | 437,676 | |||||||||
Amount of Commitments Expiring by Period | |||||||||||||||||||
Less than 1 year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years | Total | |||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Loan Commitments | $ | 57,319 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 57,319 | |||||||||
Lines of Credit | 23,904 | 18,105 | 3,292 | 32,991 | 78,292 | ||||||||||||||
Total Commitments | $ | 81,223 | $ | 18,105 | $ | 3,292 | $ | 32,991 | $ | 135,611 | |||||||||
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The consolidated financial statements and notes have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"), which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the change in the relative purchasing power of money over time and due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of our operations. Unlike most industrial companies, nearly all of our assets are monetary in nature. As a result, market interest rates have a greater impact on our performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the price of goods and services.
13
MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
General
The Company's common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the trading symbol of "PKBK". The following table reflects high and low sales prices as reported on www.nasdaq.com and cash dividends declared during each quarter of the last two fiscal years. Prices reflect a 10% stock dividend paid in May 2016.
2016 | Cash Dividends Paid | High | Low | ||||||||
1st Quarter | $ | 0.08 | $ | 13.17 | $ | 11.10 | |||||
2nd Quarter | $ | 0.08 | $ | 13.97 | $ | 12.76 | |||||
3rd Quarter | $ | 0.08 | $ | 15.85 | $ | 12.53 | |||||
4th Quarter | $ | 0.10 | $ | 20.15 | $ | 14.90 | |||||
2015 | |||||||||||
1st Quarter | $ | 0.05 | $ | 12.13 | $ | 10.78 | |||||
2nd Quarter | $ | 0.06 | $ | 13.17 | $ | 11.72 | |||||
3rd Quarter | $ | 0.06 | $ | 12.77 | $ | 11.68 | |||||
4th Quarter | $ | 0.07 | $ | 12.70 | $ | 11.74 | |||||
The number of shareholders of record of common stock as of March 8, 2017, was approximately 291. This does not reflect the number of persons or entities who held stock in nominee or "street" name through various brokerage firms. At March 17, 2017, there were 6,880,714 shares of our common stock outstanding.
The Company paid quarterly cash dividends in 2016 and 2015 totaling $2.0 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The timing and amount of future dividends will be within the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on the consolidated earnings, financial condition, liquidity, and capital requirements of the Company and its subsidiaries, applicable governmental regulations and policies, and other factors deemed relevant by the Board.
The Company's ability to pay dividends is substantially dependent upon the dividends it receives from the Bank and is subject to other restrictions. Under current regulations, the Bank's ability to pay dividends is restricted as well.
Under the New Jersey Banking Act of 1948, a bank may declare and pay dividends only if after payment of the dividend the capital stock of the bank will be unimpaired and either the bank will have a surplus of not less than 50% of its capital stock or the payment of the dividend will not reduce the bank's surplus.
Pursuant to the terms of the Series B Preferred Stock, the Company may not pay a cash dividend on the common stock unless all dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock for the then-current dividend period have been paid or set aside.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Act generally prohibits all payments of dividends by any insured bank that is in default of any assessment to the FDIC. Additionally, because the FDIC may prohibit a bank from engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, it is possible that under certain circumstances the FDIC could claim that a dividend payment constitutes an unsafe or unsound practice. The New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance has similar power to issue cease and desist orders to prohibit what might constitute unsafe or unsound practices. The payment of dividends may also be affected by other factors (e.g., the need to maintain adequate capital or to meet loan loss reserve requirements).
14
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a- 15(f). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorization of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements prepared for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Under supervision and with the participation of management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.
March 17, 2017
 |  |
Vito S. Pantilione | John F. Hawkins |
President and Chief Executive Officer | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
15
Parke Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Report
December 31, 2016
Parke Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Contents | |
Page | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm........................................................................ | |
Financial Statements | |
Consolidated Balance Sheets.............................................................................................................. | |
Consolidated Statements of Income.................................................................................................... | |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.......................................................................... | |
Consolidated Statements of Equity...................................................................................................... | |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows............................................................................................. | |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements....................................................................................... | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Parke Bancorp, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Parke Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal controls over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal controls over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Parke Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ RSM US LLP
Blue Bell, Pennsylvania
March 17, 2017
1
Parke Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Cash and due from financial institutions | $ | 4,399 | $ | 3,131 | ||||
Federal funds sold and cash equivalents | 66,321 | 24,298 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 70,720 | 27,429 | ||||||
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value | 44,854 | 42,567 | ||||||
Investment securities held to maturity (fair value of $2,411 at December 31, 2016 and $2,471 December 31, 2015) | 2,224 | 2,181 | ||||||
Total investment securities | 47,078 | 44,748 | ||||||
Loans held for sale | — | 2,640 | ||||||
Loans, net of unearned income | 851,953 | 758,501 | ||||||
Less: Allowance for loan losses | (15,580 | ) | (16,136 | ) | ||||
Net loans | 836,373 | 742,365 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable | 3,117 | 3,012 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net | 5,197 | 4,591 | ||||||
Other real estate owned (OREO) | 10,528 | 16,629 | ||||||
Restricted stock, at cost | 4,658 | 4,789 | ||||||
Bank owned life insurance (BOLI) | 24,544 | 23,822 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset | 10,746 | 10,928 | ||||||
Other assets | 3,224 | 4,171 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 1,016,185 | $ | 885,124 | ||||
Liabilities and Equity | ||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||
Deposits | ||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits | $ | 92,535 | $ | 52,773 | ||||
Interest-bearing deposits | 696,159 | 612,437 | ||||||
Total deposits | 788,694 | 665,210 | ||||||
FHLBNY borrowings | 79,650 | 84,650 | ||||||
Subordinated debentures | 13,403 | 13,403 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable | 655 | 494 | ||||||
Other liabilities | 6,693 | 9,160 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 889,095 | 772,917 | ||||||
Equity | ||||||||
Preferred stock, 1,000,000 shares authorized, $1,000 liquidation value Series B non-cumulative convertible; issued: 20,000 shares at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||||||
Common stock, $.10 par value; authorized 15,000,000 shares; Issued: 7,147,952 shares at December 31, 2016 and 6,501,610 shares at December 31, 2015 | 715 | 650 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 62,300 | 53,984 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 47,483 | 40,582 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (349 | ) | (165 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, 284,522 shares at December 31, 2016 and 280,354 shares at December 31, 2015, at cost | (3,015 | ) | (3,011 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders’ equity | 127,134 | 112,040 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries | (44 | ) | 167 | |||||
Total equity | 127,090 | 112,207 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 1,016,185 | $ | 885,124 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
2
Parke Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
Interest income: | ||||||||
Interest and fees on loans | $ | 40,740 | $ | 38,035 | ||||
Interest and dividends on investments | 1,245 | 1,296 | ||||||
Interest on federal funds sold and cash equivalents | 217 | 79 | ||||||
Total interest income | 42,202 | 39,410 | ||||||
Interest expense: | ||||||||
Interest on deposits | 5,418 | 4,744 | ||||||
Interest on borrowings | 1,346 | 1,068 | ||||||
Total interest expense | 6,764 | 5,812 | ||||||
Net interest income | 35,438 | 33,598 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 1,462 | 3,040 | ||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 33,976 | 30,558 | ||||||
Noninterest income | ||||||||
Gain on sale of SBA loans | 1,819 | 4,147 | ||||||
Gain on sale of SBA related assets | 7,611 | — | ||||||
Other Loan fees | 777 | 1,387 | ||||||
Net income from BOLI | 722 | 357 | ||||||
Service fees on deposit accounts | 315 | 290 | ||||||
Loss on sale and write-down of real estate owned | (1,830 | ) | (2,019 | ) | ||||
Other | 876 | 918 | ||||||
Total noninterest income | 10,290 | 5,080 | ||||||
Noninterest expense | ||||||||
Compensation and benefits | 7,322 | 7,717 | ||||||
Professional services | 1,639 | 1,657 | ||||||
Occupancy and equipment | 1,314 | 1,273 | ||||||
Data processing | 633 | 510 | ||||||
FDIC insurance | 584 | 682 | ||||||
OREO expense | 1,040 | 1,642 | ||||||
Other operating expense | 4,096 | 3,371 | ||||||
Total noninterest expense | 16,628 | 16,852 | ||||||
Income before income tax expense | 27,638 | 18,786 | ||||||
Income tax expense | 8,695 | 6,843 | ||||||
Net income attributable to Company and noncontrolling interest | 18,943 | 11,943 | ||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | (433 | ) | (1,246 | ) | ||||
Net income attributable to Company | 18,510 | 10,697 | ||||||
Preferred stock dividend and discount accretion | (1,200 | ) | (1,200 | ) | ||||
Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 17,310 | $ | 9,497 | ||||
Earnings per common share | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 2.53 | $ | 1.42 | ||||
Diluted | $ | 2.06 | $ | 1.22 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding | ||||||||
Basic | 6,846,514 | 6,700,718 | ||||||
Diluted | 8,964,700 | 8,772,127 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
3
Parke Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
For the Year ended December 31, | ||||||||
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | ||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 17,310 | $ | 9,497 | ||||
Unrealized gains on securities: | ||||||||
Non-credit related unrealized gains on securities with OTTI | 35 | 113 | ||||||
Unrealized losses on securities without OTTI | (344 | ) | (661 | ) | ||||
Less re-class adjustment for gains on securities included in net income | — | — | ||||||
Tax Impact | 124 | 218 | ||||||
Total unrealized gains on securities, net | (185 | ) | (330 | ) | ||||
Total other comprehensive income | (185 | ) | (330 | ) | ||||
Total comprehensive income | $ | 17,125 | $ | 9,167 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
4
Parke Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands except share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock | Shares of Common Stock | Common Stock | Additional Paid-In Capital | Retained Earnings | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Treasury Stock | Total Shareholders’ Equity | Non-Controlling Interest | Total Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | 20,000 | 6,208,259 | $ | 621 | $ | 51,316 | $ | 32,983 | $ | 165 | $ | (2,180 | ) | $ | 102,905 | $ | 145 | $ | 103,050 | ||||||||||||||||||
Capital withdrawals by noncontrolling interest | (1,224 | ) | (1,224 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised | 293,351 | 29 | 2,668 | 2,697 | 2,697 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 10,697 | 10,697 | 1,246 | 11,943 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in other comprehensive loss | (330 | ) | (330 | ) | (330 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock | (831 | ) | (831 | ) | (831 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend on preferred stock | (1,200 | ) | (1,200 | ) | (1,200 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend on common stock ($.10/ share) | (1,898 | ) | (1,898 | ) | (1,898 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2015 | $ | 20,000 | 6,501,610 | $ | 650 | $ | 53,984 | $ | 40,582 | $ | (165 | ) | $ | (3,011 | ) | $ | 112,040 | $ | 167 | $ | 112,207 | |||||||||||||||||
Capital withdrawals by noncontrolling interest | (644 | ) | (644 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised | 20,371 | 2 | 188 | 190 | 190 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 18,510 | 18,510 | 433 | 18,943 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in other comprehensive loss | (184 | ) | (184 | ) | (184 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation | 66 | 66 | 66 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock dividend 10% | 625,971 | 63 | 8,062 | (8,125 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend on preferred stock | (1,200 | ) | (1,200 | ) | (1,200 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend on common stock ($.34/ share) | (2,284 | ) | (2,284 | ) | (2,284 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2016 | $ | 20,000 | 7,147,952 | $ | 715 | $ | 62,300 | $ | 47,483 | $ | (349 | ) | $ | (3,015 | ) | $ | 127,134 | $ | (44 | ) | $ | 127,090 | ||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
5
Parke Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
(Amounts in thousands)
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 18,943 | $ | 11,943 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 270 | 251 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses | 1,462 | 3,040 | ||||||
Bank owned life insurance income | (722 | ) | (357 | ) | ||||
Bank owned life insurance additional purchase | — | (12,000 | ) | |||||
Gain on sale of SBA loans | (1,819 | ) | (4,147 | ) | ||||
SBA loans originated for sale | (15,080 | ) | (38,244 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of SBA loans originated for sale | 16,901 | 42,684 | ||||||
Loss on sale & write down of OREO, net | 1,830 | 2,019 | ||||||
Gain on sale of SBA related assets | (7,611 | ) | — | |||||
Net accretion of purchase premiums and discounts on securities | (44 | ) | (623 | ) | ||||
Deferred income tax benefit | 305 | (190 | ) | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable and other assets | 593 | (1,008 | ) | |||||
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable and other accrued liabilities | (2,306 | ) | 1,686 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 12,722 | 5,054 | ||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities | ||||||||
Purchases of investment securities available for sale | (10,000 | ) | (20,476 | ) | ||||
Purchases (redemptions) of restricted stock | 131 | (1,637 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of SBA related assets | 50,348 | — | ||||||
Proceeds from loans held for sale | 2,638 | — | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities and principal payments on mortgage backed securities | 7,406 | 6,150 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of OREO | 5,222 | 7,576 | ||||||
Advances on OREO | (194 | ) | (139 | ) | ||||
Donation of OREO property | 31 | — | ||||||
Net increase in loans | (138,996 | ) | (55,541 | ) | ||||
Purchases of bank premises and equipment | (875 | ) | (352 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (84,289 | ) | (64,419 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | ||||||||
Cash payment of dividends | (3,234 | ) | (2,661 | ) | ||||
Minority interest capital withdrawal, net | (644 | ) | (1,224 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants | 190 | 2,697 | ||||||
Purchase of treasury stock | (4 | ) | (831 | ) | ||||
Stock compensation | 66 | — | ||||||
Net (decrease) increase in FHLBNY borrowings | (5,000 | ) | 35,298 | |||||
Net increase in noninterest-bearing deposits | 39,762 | 10,219 | ||||||
Net increase in interest-bearing deposits | 83,722 | 7,058 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 114,858 | 50,556 | ||||||
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | 43,291 | (8,809 | ) | |||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, January 1, | 27,429 | 36,238 | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, December 31, | $ | 70,720 | $ | 27,429 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: | ||||||||
Cash paid during the year for: | ||||||||
Interest on deposits and borrowed funds | $ | 6,603 | $ | 5,763 | ||||
Income taxes | $ | 9,984 | $ | 6,494 | ||||
Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Activities: | ||||||||
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans | $ | 788 | $ | 5,154 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
6
PARKE BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business: Parke Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company, we, us, our”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Sewell, New Jersey. Through subsidiaries, the Company provides individuals, corporations and other businesses, and institutions with commercial and retail banking services, principally loans and deposits. The Company was incorporated in January 2005 under the laws of the State of New Jersey for the sole purpose of becoming the holding company of Parke Bank (the "Bank").
The Bank is a commercial bank, which was incorporated on August 25, 1998, and commenced operations on January 28, 1999. The Bank is chartered by the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance and its deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Bank maintains its principal office at 601 Delsea Drive, Sewell, New Jersey, and six additional branch office locations; 501 Tilton Road, Northfield, New Jersey, 567 Egg Harbor Road, Washington Township, New Jersey, 67 East Jimmie Leeds Road, Galloway Township, New Jersey, 1150 Haddon Avenue, Collingswood, New Jersey, 1610 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and 1032 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
The accounting and financial reporting policies of the Company and Subsidiaries conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and to general practices within the banking industry. The policies that materially affect the determination of financial position, results of operations and cash flows are summarized below.
Principles of Consolidation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Parke Bank. Also included are the accounts of 44 Business Capital Partners LLC, a joint venture formed in 2009 to originate and service Small Business Administration (“SBA”) loans. Parke Bank has a 51% ownership interest in the joint venture. The assets of the joint venture were sold on April 29, 2016. Parke Capital Trust I, Parke Capital Trust II and Parke Capital Trust III are wholly-owned subsidiaries but are not consolidated because they do not meet the requirements for consolidation under applicable accounting guidance. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Investment Securities: At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company held investment securities that would be held for indefinite periods of time, including securities that would be used as part of the Company’s asset/liability management strategy and possibly sold in response to changes in interest rates, prepayments and similar factors. These securities are classified as “available for sale” and are carried at fair value, with any temporary unrealized gains or losses reported as other comprehensive income, net of the related income tax effect.
At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company also reported investments in securities that were carried at cost, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these investment securities to maturity considering all reasonably foreseeable events or conditions. These securities are classified as “held to maturity.”
Declines in the fair value of individual debt securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary result in write-downs of the individual securities to their fair value. Debt securities that are deemed to be other than temporarily impaired are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent impairment is related to credit losses. The amount of the impairment for debt securities related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). In evaluating other than temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the reasons for the decline in value, (3) the financial position and access to capital of the issuer, including the current and future impact of any specific events, and (4) for fixed maturity securities, whether the Company intends to sell the security, or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of the cost basis, which may be maturity and such loss is taken into earnings.
The amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts over the contractual lives of the related securities are recognized in interest income using the interest method. Gains and losses on the sale of such securities are accounted for using the specific identification method.
7
Restricted Stock: Restricted stock includes investments in the common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLBNY”) and the Atlantic Central Bankers Bank for which no market exists and, accordingly, is carried at cost. The stocks have no quoted market value and are subject to redemption restrictions. Management reviews these stocks for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of the cost basis in the stock. The stocks’ value is determined by the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines. Management considers such criteria as the significance of the decline in net assets, if any, the length of time this situation has persisted and the financial performance of the issuers. In addition, management considers any commitments by the FHLBNY to make payments required by law or regulation, the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on the customer base of the FHLBNY and the liquidity position of the FHLBNY.
Loans: The Company makes commercial, real estate and consumer loans to customers. A substantial portion of the loan portfolio is represented by loans in the Southern New Jersey and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania markets. The ability of the Company’s debtors to honor their contracts is dependent upon the real estate and general economic conditions in this area. Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off generally are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal amount, adjusted for charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses and any unamortized deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income on loans is recognized as earned based on contractual interest rates applied to daily principal amounts outstanding.
Loans-Nonaccrual: Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when, in management's opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet contractual payment obligations as they become due, as well as when a loan is 90 days past due, unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection, as required by regulatory provisions. Loans may be placed on nonaccrual status regardless of whether or not such loans are considered past due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received in excess of principal due.
Troubled Debt Restructurings: Troubled debt restructuring (“TDRs”) are loans for which the Company, for legal or economic reasons related to a debtor’s financial difficulties, has granted a concession to the debtor that it otherwise would not have considered. Concessions that result in the categorization of a loan as a TDR include:
• | Reduction (absolute or contingent) of the stated interest rate; |
• | Extension of the maturity date or dates at a stated interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk; |
• | Reduction (absolute or contingent) of the face amount or maturity amount of the debt as stated in the instrument or other agreement; or |
• | Reduction (absolute or contingent) of accrued interest. |
TDRs are reported as impaired loans. Interest income on TDR loans is recognized consistent with the Company’s nonaccrual loan policy stated above.
Concentration of Credit Risk: The Company’s loans are generally to diversified customers in Southern New Jersey and the Philadelphia area of Pennsylvania. Loans to general building contractors, general merchandise stores, restaurants, motels, warehouse space, and real estate ventures (including construction loans) constitute a majority of commercial loans. The concentrations of credit by type of loan are set forth in Note 4. Generally, loans are collateralized by assets of the borrower and are expected to be repaid from the borrower’s cash flow or proceeds from the sale of selected assets of the borrower.
Loan Fees: Loan fees and direct costs associated with loan originations are netted and deferred. The deferred amount is recognized as an adjustment to loan interest over the term of the related loans using the interest method. Loan brokerage fees represent commissions earned for facilitating loans between borrowers and other companies and is recorded as loan fee income. Loan fee income also includes prepayment penalties on loans.
Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses is maintained through charges to the provision for loan losses in the Consolidated Statements of Income as losses are estimated to have occurred. Loans or portions thereof that are determined to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb estimated losses relating to specifically identified loans, as well as probable credit losses in the balance of the loan portfolio, based on an evaluation of collectability of existing loans and prior loss experience. When evaluating the adequacy of the allowance, an assessment of the loan portfolio will typically take into consideration changes in the composition and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality and past loss experience, review of specific problem loans,
8
current economic conditions which may affect borrowers’ ability to repay, changes in values of collateral and other factors which may warrant current recognition. Such periodic assessments may, in management’s judgment, require the Company to recognize additions or reductions to the allowance.
Various regulatory agencies periodically review the adequacy of the Company’s allowance for loan losses as an integral part of their examination process. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions or reductions to the allowance based on their evaluation of information available to them at the time of their examination. It is reasonably possible that the above factors may change significantly and, therefore, affect management’s determination of the allowance for loan losses in the near term.
The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired, including TDRs. For those loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value for collateral-dependent loans or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical charge-off experience and incurred losses given the Company’s internal risk rating process. Other adjustments may be made to the allowance for pools of loans after an assessment of internal or external influences on credit quality that are not reflected in the historical loss or risk rating data.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Factors considered by management when evaluating impaired loans include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately evaluate individual consumer loans for impairment.
Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”): Real estate acquired through foreclosure or other proceedings is carried at fair value less estimated costs of disposal. Costs of improving OREO are capitalized to the extent that the carrying value does not exceed its fair value less estimated selling costs. Subsequent valuation adjustments, if any, are recognized as a charge against current earnings. Holding costs are charged to expense. Gains and losses on sales are recognized in noninterest income as they occur.
Interest Rate Risk: The Company is principally engaged in the business of attracting deposits from the general public and using these deposits, together with other borrowed and brokered funds, to make commercial, commercial mortgage, residential mortgage, and consumer loans, and to invest in overnight and term investment securities. Inherent in such activities is interest rate risk that results from differences in the maturities and repricing characteristics of these assets and liabilities. For this reason, management regularly monitors the level of interest rate risk and the potential impact on net income.
Bank Premises and Equipment: Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed and charged to expense using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally three years for computers and software, five to ten years for equipment and forty years for buildings. Leasehold improvements are amortized to expense over the shorter of the term of the respective lease or the estimated useful life of the improvements.
Income Taxes: Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the difference between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income in the future.
9
When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that ultimately would be sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more-likely-than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. The evaluation of a tax position taken is considered by itself and not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheet along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.
Interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits would be recognized in income tax expense on the income statement.
The Company did not recognize any interest or penalties related to income tax during the years ended December 31, 2016 or 2015. The Company does not have an accrual for uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2016 or 2015, as deductions taken and benefits accrued are based on widely understood administrative practices and procedures and are based on clear and unambiguous tax law. Tax returns for all years 2013 and thereafter are subject to further examination by tax authorities, with the exception of the State of New Jersey for which tax returns for all years 2012 and thereafter are subject to further examination.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term include the allowance for loan losses, other than temporary impairment losses on investment securities, the valuation of deferred income taxes, and carrying value of OREO.
Segment Reporting: The Company operates one reportable segment of business, “community banking”. Through its community banking segment, the Company provides a broad range of retail and community banking services.
Reclassifications: Certain items in the 2015 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2016 presentation. Such reclassifications have no impact on prior year earnings and shareholders’ equity.
Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive income consists of net income and other gains and losses affecting shareholders' equity that, under GAAP, are excluded from net income, including unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities.
Accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted of the following at December 31, 2016 and 2015:
2016 | 2015 | ||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||
Securities: | |||||||
Non-credit unrealized losses on available for sale securities with OTTI | $ | (309 | ) | $ | (344 | ) | |
Unrealized (losses) gains on available for sale securities without OTTI | (273 | ) | 71 | ||||
Tax impact | 233 | 108 | |||||
$ | (349 | ) | $ | (165 | ) | ||
Earnings Per Common Share: Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share considers common stock equivalents (when dilutive) outstanding during the period such as options outstanding and convertible preferred stock. To the extent that stock equivalents are anti-dilutive, they have been excluded from the earnings per share calculation. Both basic and diluted earnings per share computations give retroactive effect to a stock dividend declared and paid in 2016 (Note 13). Earnings per common share have been computed based on the following for 2016 and 2015:
10
2016 | 2015 | ||||||
(dollars in thousands, except share data) | |||||||
Basic earnings per common share | |||||||
Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 17,310 | $ | 9,497 | |||
Average common shares outstanding | 6,846,514 | 6,700,718 | |||||
Basic earnings per common share | $ | 2.53 | $ | 1.42 | |||
Diluted earnings per common share | |||||||
Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 17,310 | $ | 9,497 | |||
Dividend on Preferred Series B | 1,200 | 1,200 | |||||
Net income available to common shareholders pre dividend on Preferred Series B | $ | 18,510 | $ | 10,697 | |||
Average common shares outstanding | 6,846,514 | 6,700,718 | |||||
Dilutive potential common shares | 2,118,186 | 2,071,409 | |||||
Total diluted average common shares outstanding | 8,964,700 | 8,772,127 | |||||
Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 2.06 | $ | 1.22 | |||
For 2016 and 2015, there were no options outstanding that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the options’ common stock equivalents and preferred stock were anti-dilutive.
Statement of Cash Flows: Cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from financial institutions and federal funds sold. For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, changes in loans and deposits are shown on a net basis.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:
During August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-15, which is a new guidance related to the Statement of Cash Flows. The new guidance clarifies the classification within the statement of cash flows for certain transactions, including debt extinguishment costs, zero-coupon debt, and contingent consideration related to business combinations, insurance proceeds, equity method distributions and beneficial interests in securitizations. The guidance also clarifies that cash flows with aspects of multiple classes of cash flows or that cannot be separated by source or use should be classified based on the activity that is likely to be the predominant source or use of cash flows for the item. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to be material to the consolidated financial statements.
During June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments Credit Losses. ASU 2016-13 (Topic 326), replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with an expected credit loss methodology and requires consideration of a broader range of information to determine credit loss estimates. Financial assets measured at amortized cost will be presented at the net amount expected to be collected by using an allowance for credit losses. Purchased credit impaired loans will receive an allowance account at the acquisition date that represents a component of the purchase price allocation. Credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities will be recorded through an allowance for credit losses, with such allowance limited to the amount by which fair value is below amortized cost. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact on its consolidated financial statements.
On January 5, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (the ASU) which provides for changes to the current GAAP model primarily affect the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, the FASB clarified guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The accounting for other financial instruments, such as loans, investments in debt securities, and financial liabilities is largely unchanged. The more significant amendments are summarized below. ASU 2016-01 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of these amendments.
11
On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU No. 2016-02 includes a lessee accounting model that recognizes two types of leases - finance leases and operating leases. The standard requires that a lessee recognize on the balance sheet assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. (Leases with terms of less than 12 months are exempt from the new standard.) The recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee will depend on its classification as finance or operating lease. New disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases are also required. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements, providing information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years (that is, for a calendar year-end public entity, the changes take effect beginning January 1, 2019). The Company is currently evaluating the impact of these amendments.
During March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Stock Compensation. ASU No. 2016-09(Topic 718) eliminates the concept of additional paid in capital pools for stock-based awards and requires that the related excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies be classified as an operating activity in the statement of cash flows. The new guidance also allows entities to make a one-time policy election to account for forfeitures when they occur, instead of accruing compensation cost based on the number of awards expected to vest. Additionally, the new guidance changes the requirement for an award to qualify for equity classification by permitting tax withholding up to the maximum statutory tax rate instead of the minimum statutory tax rate. Cash paid by an employer when directly withholding shares for tax withholding purposes should be classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to be material to the consolidated financial statements.
During May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU No.2014-09 (Topic 606) supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Accounting Standards Codification. The guidance requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. During August 2015, the FASB provided a one-year deferral of the effective date; therefore, the guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The FASB has also issued clarification guidance as it relates to principal versus agent considerations for revenue recognition purposes and clarification guidance on other various considerations related to the new revenue recognition guidance. Additionally, during April 2016, the FASB issued further clarification guidance related to identifying performance obligations and licensing. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Note 2. Cash and Due from Banks
The Company maintains various deposit accounts with other banks to meet normal funds transaction requirements, to satisfy deposit reserve requirements, and to compensate other banks for certain correspondent services. Management is responsible for assessing the credit risk of its correspondent banks. The withdrawal or usage restrictions of these balances did not have a significant impact on the operations of the Company as of December 31, 2016 or 2015, because reserve requirements were covered by vault cash.
12
Note 3. Investment Securities
The following is a summary of the Company's investment in available for sale and held to maturity securities as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
As of December 31, 2016 | Amortized cost | Gross unrealized gains | Gross unrealized losses | Other than temporary impairments in OCI | Fair value | ||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Available for sale: | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt obligations | $ | 1,000 | $ | 11 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,011 | |||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 43,530 | 218 | 508 | — | 43,240 | ||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations | 160 | 6 | — | — | 166 | ||||||||||||||
Collateralized debt obligations | 746 | — | — | 309 | 437 | ||||||||||||||
Total available for sale | $ | 45,436 | $ | 235 | $ | 508 | $ | 309 | $ | 44,854 | |||||||||
Held to maturity: | |||||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions | $ | 2,224 | $ | 187 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,411 | |||||||||
As of December 31, 2015 | Amortized cost | Gross unrealized gains | Gross unrealized losses | Other than temporary impairments in OCI | Fair value | ||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Available for sale: | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt obligations | $ | 1,000 | $ | 31 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,031 | |||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities | 40,788 | 451 | 418 | — | 40,821 | ||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations | 246 | 7 | — | — | 253 | ||||||||||||||
Collateralized debt obligations | 806 | — | — | 344 | 462 | ||||||||||||||
Total available for sale | $ | 42,840 | $ | 489 | $ | 418 | $ | 344 | $ | 42,567 | |||||||||
Held to maturity: | |||||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions | $ | 2,181 | $ | 290 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,471 | |||||||||
13
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities classified as available for sale and held to maturity, by contractual maturity, as of December 31, 2016, are as follows:
Amortized Cost | Fair Value | ||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||
Available for sale: | |||||||
Due within one year | $ | — | $ | — | |||
Due after one year through five years | — | — | |||||
Due after five years through ten years | 500 | 500 | |||||
Due after ten years | 1,246 | 948 | |||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations | 43,690 | 43,406 | |||||
Total available for sale | $ | 45,436 | $ | 44,854 | |||
Held to maturity: | |||||||
Due within one year | $ | — | $ | — | |||
Due after one year through five years | — | — | |||||
Due after five years through ten years | 1,212 | 1,253 | |||||
Due after ten years | 1,012 | 1,158 | |||||
Total held to maturity | $ | 2,224 | $ | 2,411 | |||
Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities for mortgage related securities because the issuers of certain debt securities do have the right to call or prepay their obligations without any penalties.
During the year ending December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company did not sell any investment securities.
Securities with a carrying value of $23.1 million and $15.6 million, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits at December 31, 2016 and 2015.
The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company's investments with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other than temporarily impaired (“OTTI”), aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2016 there were 7 securities in a less than 12 months loss position and 3 in a greater than 12 months. At December 31, 2015 there were 5 securities in a less than 12 months loss position and 3 greater than 12 months.
As of December 31, 2016 | Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Description of Securities | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available for sale: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities | $ | 17,519 | $ | 484 | $ | 1,077 | $ | 24 | $ | 18,596 | $ | 508 | ||||||||||||
Total available for sale | $ | 17,519 | $ | 484 | $ | 1,077 | $ | 24 | $ | 18,596 | $ | 508 | ||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2015 | Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Greater | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Description of Securities | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available for sale: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities | $ | 19,191 | $ | 343 | $ | 3,221 | $ | 75 | $ | 22,412 | $ | 418 | ||||||||||||
Total available for sale | $ | 19,191 | $ | 343 | $ | 3,221 | $ | 75 | $ | 22,412 | $ | 418 | ||||||||||||
14
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities
The unrealized losses on the Company’s investment in mortgage-backed securities relates to ten securities. The losses were caused by movement in interest rates. The securities were issued by FNMA, GNMA and FHLMC all government sponsored entities. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investment and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, it does not consider the investment in these securities to be OTTI at December 31, 2016.
Other than Temporarily Impaired Debt Securities
The Company assesses whether we intend to sell or whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell a security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit losses. For debt securities that are considered OTTI and that we do not intend to sell and will not be required to sell prior to recovery of our amortized cost basis, we separate the amount of the impairment into the amount that is credit related (credit loss component) and the amount due to all other factors. The credit loss component is recognized in earnings and is the difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and the present value of its expected future cash flows. The remaining difference between the security’s fair value and the present value of future expected cash flows is due to factors that are not credit related and is recognized in other comprehensive income.
The present value of expected future cash flows is determined using the best estimate of cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate implicit to the security at the date of purchase or the current yield to accrete an asset-backed or floating rate security. The methodology and assumptions for establishing the best estimate of cash flows vary depending on the type of security. The asset-backed securities’ cash flow estimates are based on bond-specific facts and circumstances that may include collateral characteristics, expectations of delinquency and default rates, loss severity and prepayment speeds and structural support, including subordination and guarantees. The corporate bond cash flow estimates are derived from scenario-based outcomes of expected corporate re-structuring or the disposition of assets using bond specific facts and circumstances including timing, security interests and loss severity.
We have a process in place to identify debt securities that could potentially have a credit impairment that is other than temporary. This process involves monitoring late payments, pricing levels, downgrades by rating agencies, key financial ratios, financial statements, revenue forecasts and cash flow projections as indicators of credit issues. On a quarterly basis, we review all securities to determine whether an OTTI exists and whether losses should be recognized. We consider relevant facts and circumstances in evaluating whether a credit or interest rate-related impairment of a security is other than temporary. Relevant facts and circumstances considered include: (1) the extent and length of time the fair value has been below cost; (2) the reasons for the decline in value; (3) the financial position and access to capital of the issuer, including the current and future impact of any specific events and (4) for fixed maturity securities, our intent to sell a security or whether it is more likely than not we will be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost which, in some cases, may extend to maturity and for equity securities, our ability and intent to hold the security for a period of time that allows for the recovery in value.
OTTI recognized in earnings for credit-impaired debt securities is presented as additions in two components based upon whether the current period is the first time the debt security was credit-impaired (initial credit impairment) or is not the first time the debt security was credit-impaired (subsequent credit impairments). The credit loss component is reduced if we sell, intend to sell or believe we will be required to sell previously credit-impaired debt securities. Additionally, the credit loss component is reduced if we receive cash flows in excess of what we expected to receive over the remaining life of the credit-impaired debt security, the security matures or is fully written down. There were no investment gains and losses recognized in income during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
15
Note 4. Loans
The portfolio of loans outstanding consists of:
December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||
Amount | Percentage of Total Loans | Amount | Percentage of Total Loans | ||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | $ | 26,774 | 3.1 | % | $ | 27,140 | 3.6 | % | |||||
Real Estate Construction: | |||||||||||||
Residential | 8,825 | 1.0 | 7,750 | 1.0 | |||||||||
Commercial | 58,469 | 6.9 | 45,245 | 6.0 | |||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | |||||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | 123,898 | 14.5 | 172,040 | 22.7 | |||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | 268,123 | 31.5 | 256,471 | 33.8 | |||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 309,340 | 36.3 | 213,266 | 28.1 | |||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | 39,804 | 4.7 | 18,113 | 2.4 | |||||||||
Consumer | 16,720 | 2.0 | 18,476 | 2.4 | |||||||||
Total Loans | $ | 851,953 | 100.0 | % | $ | 758,501 | 100.0 | % | |||||
At December 31, 2016 and 2015, approximately $193.9 million and $132.3 million, respectively, of loans were pledged to the FHLBNY on borrowings (Note 9). This pledge consists of a blanket lien on residential mortgages and certain qualifying commercial real estate loans.
Loan Origination/Risk Management: In the normal course of business the Company is exposed to a variety of operational, reputational, legal, regulatory and credit risks that could adversely affect our financial performance. Most of our asset risk is primarily tied to credit (lending) risk. The Company has lending policies, guidelines and procedures in place that are designed to maximize loan income within an acceptable level of risk. The Board of Directors reviews and approves these policies, guidelines and procedures. When we originate a loan we make certain subjective judgments about the borrower’s ability to meet the loan’s terms and conditions. We also make objective and subjective value assessments on the assets we finance. The borrower’s ability to repay can be adversely affected by economic changes. Likewise, changes in market conditions and other external factors can affect asset valuations. The Company actively monitors the quality of its loan portfolio. A reporting system supplements the credit review process by providing management with frequent reports related to loan production, loan quality, concentrations of credit risk, loan delinquencies, troubled debt restructures, nonperforming and potential problem loans. Diversification in the loan portfolio is another means of managing risk associated with fluctuations in economic conditions.
The Company originates secured loans for business purposes. Loans are made to provide working capital to businesses in the form of lines of credit, which may be secured by accounts receivable, inventory, equipment or other assets. The financial condition and cash flow of commercial borrowers are closely monitored by means of corporate financial statements, personal financial statements and income tax returns. The frequency of submissions of required financial information depends on the size and complexity of the credit and the collateral that secures the loan. The Company’s general policy is to obtain personal guarantees from the principals of the commercial loan borrowers. Such loans are made to businesses located in the Company’s market area.
With respect to construction loans to developers and builders that are secured by non-owner occupied properties, the Company generally requires the borrower to have had an existing relationship with the Company and have a proven record of success. Construction loans are underwritten utilizing feasibility studies, independent appraisal reviews, sensitivity analysis of absorption and lease rates and financial analyses of the developers and property owners. Construction loans are generally underwritten based upon estimates of costs and value associated with the complete project. These estimates may be inaccurate. Construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project. Sources of repayment for these types of loans may be pre-committed permanent loans from approved long-term lenders, sales of developed property or an interim loan commitment from the Company until permanent financing is obtained. These loans are closely monitored by on-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans due to their ultimate repayment being sensitive to interest rate changes, governmental regulation of real property, general economic conditions and the availability of long-term financing.
16
Commercial real estate loans, including multi-family loans, are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial loans, in addition to those of real estate loans. Commercial real estate loans may be riskier than those for one-to-four family residences and are typically larger in dollar size. These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. The repayment of these loans is generally largely dependent on the successful operation and management of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. The properties securing the Company’s commercial real estate portfolio are diverse in terms of type and geographic location within our market area. This diversity helps reduce the Company's exposure to adverse economic events that affect any single market or industry. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral, geography and risk grade criteria. The Company also monitors economic conditions and trends affecting market areas it serves. In addition, management tracks the level of owner-occupied commercial real estate loans versus non-owner occupied loans. At December 31, 2016, approximately 55.0% of the outstanding principal balance of the Company’s commercial real estate loans were secured by non-owner occupied properties.
The Company originates adjustable and fixed-rate residential mortgage loans. Such mortgage loans are generally originated under terms, conditions and documentation acceptable to the secondary mortgage market. Although the Company has placed all of these loans into its portfolio, a substantial majority of such loans can be sold in the secondary market or pledged for potential borrowings. The source of repayment is the borrower's income and could be adversely affected by job loss or illness.
Consumer loans may carry a higher degree of repayment risk than residential mortgage loans. Repayment is typically dependent upon the borrower’s financial stability which is more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, illness, or personal bankruptcy. To monitor and manage consumer loan risk, policies and procedures are developed and modified as needed. This activity, coupled with relatively small loan amounts that are spread across many individual borrowers, minimizes risk. Additionally, trend and outlook reports are reviewed by management on a regular basis. Underwriting standards for home equity loans are heavily influenced by statutory requirements, which include, but are not limited to, a maximum loan-to-value percentage of 80%, collection remedies, the number of such loans a borrower can have at one time and documentation requirements. Historically the Company’s losses on consumer loans have been negligible.
The Company maintains an outsourced independent loan review program that reviews and validates the credit risk assessment program on a periodic basis. Results of these external independent reviews are presented to management. The Company maintains a risk monitoring program through a standalone Credit Risk Management Department. The external independent loan review process complements and reinforces the risk identification and assessment decisions made by lenders and credit risk management personnel.
Concentrations of Credit: Most of the Company's lending activity occurs within the areas of southern New Jersey and southeastern Pennsylvania, as well as other markets. The majority of the Company's loan portfolio consists of commercial real estate loans. No one industry sector exceeds 10% of total loans.
Loans to Related Parties: In the normal course of business, the Company has granted loans to officers, directors and their affiliates (related parties). All loans to related parties were made in the ordinary course of business; were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable loans with persons not related to the Bank; and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. The other reductions were due to a former directors loans.
An analysis of the activity of such related party loans for 2016 and 2015 is as follows:
2016 | 2015 | ||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||
Balance, beginning of year | $ | 20,072 | $ | 20,233 | |||
Advances | 418 | 4,568 | |||||
Less: repayments | (856 | ) | (4,729 | ) | |||
Less: reduction due to death of a director | (5,662 | ) | — | ||||
Balance, end of year | $ | 13,972 | $ | 20,072 | |||
17
An age analysis of past due loans by class follows:
December 31, 2016 | 30-59 Days Past Due | 60-89 Days Past Due | Greater than 90 Days and Not Accruing | Total Past Due | Current | Total Loans | Loans > 90 Days and Accruing | |||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | $ | — | — | 159 | 159 | 26,615 | $ | 26,774 | — | |||||||||||||
Real Estate Construction: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential | — | — | — | — | 8,825 | 8,825 | — | |||||||||||||||
Commercial | — | — | 3,241 | 3,241 | 55,228 | 58,469 | — | |||||||||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | — | 165 | 430 | 595 | 123,303 | 123,898 | — | |||||||||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | — | — | 3,958 | 3,958 | 264,165 | 268,123 | — | |||||||||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 715 | 361 | 3,095 | 4,171 | 305,169 | 309,340 | — | |||||||||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | — | — | 308 | 308 | 39,496 | 39,804 | — | |||||||||||||||
Consumer | 31 | 42 | 107 | 180 | 16,540 | 16,720 | — | |||||||||||||||
Total Loans | $ | 746 | 568 | 11,298 | 12,612 | 839,341 | $ | 851,953 | — | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2015 | 30-59 Days Past Due | 60-89 Days Past Due | Greater than 90 Days and Not Accruing | Total Past Due | Current | Total Loans | Loans > 90 Days and Accruing | |||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | $ | — | — | 740 | 740 | 26,400 | $ | 27,140 | — | |||||||||||||
Real Estate Construction: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential | — | — | — | — | 7,750 | 7,750 | — | |||||||||||||||
Commercial | — | — | 5,204 | 5,204 | 40,041 | 45,245 | — | |||||||||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | 812 | — | 358 | 1,170 | 170,870 | 172,040 | — | |||||||||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | — | — | 4,002 | 4,002 | 252,469 | 256,471 | — | |||||||||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | — | — | 3,255 | 3,255 | 210,011 | 213,266 | — | |||||||||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | 357 | — | — | 357 | 17,756 | 18,113 | — | |||||||||||||||
Consumer | 31 | 32 | — | 63 | 18,413 | 18,476 | — | |||||||||||||||
Total Loans | $ | 1,200 | 32 | 13,559 | 14,791 | 743,710 | $ | 758,501 | — | |||||||||||||
Impaired Loans: Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled principal and interest payments.
All impaired loans that are secured by real estate are assessed for recoverability based on an independent third-party full appraisal to determine the net realizable value (“NRV”) based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, less costs to sell and other costs, such as unpaid real estate taxes, that have been identified, or the present value of discounted cash flows in the case of certain impaired loans that are not collateral dependent. The appraisal will be based on an "as-is" valuation and will follow a reasonable valuation method that addresses the direct sales comparison, income, and cost approaches to market value, reconciles those approaches, and explains the elimination of each approach not used. Appraisals are generally updated every 12 months or sooner if we have identified possible further deterioration in value. Prior to receiving the updated appraisal, we will establish a specific reserve for any estimated deterioration, based upon our assessment of market conditions, adjusted for estimated costs to sell and other identified costs. If the NRV is greater than the loan amount, then no impairment loss exists. If the NRV is less than the loan amount, the shortfall is recognized by a specific reserve. If the borrower fails to pledge additional collateral within a ninety days period, a charge-off equal to the difference between the loan carrying value and NRV will occur. In certain circumstances, however, a direct charge-off may be taken at the time that the NRV calculation reveals a shortfall. All impaired loans are evaluated based on the criteria stated above on a quarterly basis and any change in the reserve requirements are recorded in the period identified. All partially charged-off loans remain on nonaccrual status until they are brought current as to both principal and interest and have at least six months of payment history and future collectability of principal and interest is assured.
18
Impaired loans are set forth in the following tables.
December 31, 2016 | Recorded Investment | Unpaid Principal Balance | Related Allowance | ||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||
With no related allowance recorded: | |||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | $ | 21 | $ | 23 | $ | — | |||||
Real Estate Construction: | |||||||||||
Residential | — | — | — | ||||||||
Commercial | 1,161 | 1,161 | — | ||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | |||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | — | — | — | ||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | 3,494 | 3,739 | — | ||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 2,384 | 2,434 | — | ||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | 308 | 354 | — | ||||||||
Consumer | 107 | 107 | — | ||||||||
7,475 | 7,818 | — | |||||||||
With an allowance recorded: | |||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | 138 | 1,392 | 138 | ||||||||
Real Estate Construction: | |||||||||||
Residential | — | — | — | ||||||||
Commercial | 7,225 | 11,125 | 155 | ||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | |||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | 4,380 | 4,409 | 498 | ||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | 15,506 | 17,100 | 226 | ||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 1,681 | 1,697 | 234 | ||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | — | — | — | ||||||||
Consumer | — | — | — | ||||||||
28,930 | 35,723 | 1,251 | |||||||||
Total: | |||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | 159 | 1,415 | 138 | ||||||||
Real Estate Construction: | |||||||||||
Residential | — | — | — | ||||||||
Commercial | 8,386 | 12,286 | 155 | ||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | |||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | 4,380 | 4,409 | 498 | ||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | 19,000 | 20,839 | 226 | ||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 4,065 | 4,131 | 234 | ||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | 308 | 354 | — | ||||||||
Consumer | 107 | 107 | — | ||||||||
$ | 36,405 | $ | 43,541 | $ | 1,251 | ||||||
19
December 31, 2015 | Recorded Investment | Unpaid Principal Balance | Related Allowance | ||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||
With no related allowance recorded: | |||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | $ | 680 | $ | 1,934 | $ | — | |||||
Real Estate Construction: | |||||||||||
Residential | — | — | — | ||||||||
Commercial | 1,420 | 1,517 | — | ||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | |||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | 358 | 358 | — | ||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | 1,281 | 1,281 | — | ||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 1,858 | 1,910 | — | ||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | — | — | — | ||||||||
Consumer | — | — | — | ||||||||
5,597 | 7,000 | — | |||||||||
With an allowance recorded: | |||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | 503 | 504 | 67 | ||||||||
Real Estate Construction: | |||||||||||
Residential | — | — | — | ||||||||
Commercial | 5,696 | 8,420 | 1,149 | ||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | |||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | 4,341 | 4,370 | 73 | ||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | 23,303 | 24,988 | 486 | ||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 2,426 | 3,200 | 709 | ||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | 356 | 356 | 5 | ||||||||
Consumer | — | — | — | ||||||||
36,625 | 41,838 | 2,489 | |||||||||
Total: | |||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | 1,183 | 2,438 | 67 | ||||||||
Real Estate Construction: | |||||||||||
Residential | — | — | — | ||||||||
Commercial | 7,116 | 9,937 | 1,149 | ||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | |||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | 4,699 | 4,728 | 73 | ||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | 24,584 | 26,269 | 486 | ||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 4,284 | 5,110 | 709 | ||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | 356 | 356 | 5 | ||||||||
Consumer | — | — | — | ||||||||
$ | 42,222 | $ | 48,838 | $ | 2,489 | ||||||
20
The following table presents by loan portfolio class, the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||
Average Recorded Investment | Interest Income Recognized | Average Recorded Investment | Interest Income Recognized | ||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | $ | 333 | $ | 1 | $ | 3,088 | $ | 45 | |||||||
Real Estate Construction: | |||||||||||||||
Residential | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Commercial | 9,340 | 234 | 10,013 | 87 | |||||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | |||||||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | 4,878 | 176 | 5,548 | 196 | |||||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | 19,281 | 751 | 26,554 | 985 | |||||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 4,130 | 122 | 5,491 | 113 | |||||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | 320 | 8 | 359 | 26 | |||||||||||
Consumer | 108 | 6 | — | — | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 38,390 | $ | 1,298 | $ | 51,053 | $ | 1,452 | |||||||
Troubled debt restructurings: Periodically or upon modification management evaluates our loans in order to determine the appropriate risk rating, interest accrual status and potential classification as a TDR, some of which are performing and accruing interest. A TDR is a loan on which we have granted a concession due to a borrower’s financial difficulty, that would not otherwise be considered. The terms of these modified loans may include extension of maturity, renewals, changes in interest rate, additional collateral requirements or infusion of additional capital into the project by the borrower to reduce debt or to support future debt service. On construction and land development loans we may modify the loan as a result of delays or other project issues such as slower than anticipated sell-outs, insufficient leasing activity and/or a decline in the value of the underlying collateral securing the loan. Management believes that working with a borrower to restructure a loan provides us with a better likelihood of collecting our loan. It is our policy not to renegotiate the terms of a commercial loan simply because of a delinquency status. However, we will use our Troubled Debt Restructuring Program to work with delinquent borrowers when the delinquency is temporary. We consider all loans modified in a TDR to be impaired.
At the time a loan is modified in a TDR, we consider the following factors to determine whether the loan should accrue interest:
• | Whether there is a period of current payment history under the current terms, typically 6 months; |
• | Whether the loan is current at the time of restructuring; and |
• | Whether we expect the loan to continue to perform under the restructured terms with a debt coverage ratio that complies with the Bank’s credit underwriting policy of 1.25 times debt service. |
We also review the financial performance of the borrower over the past year to be reasonably assured of repayment and performance according to the modified terms. This review consists of an analysis of the borrower’s historical results; the borrower’s projected results over the next four quarters; current financial information of the borrower and any guarantors. The projected repayment source needs to be reliable, verifiable, quantifiable and sustainable. In addition, all TDRs are reviewed quarterly to determine the amount of any impairment.
At the time of restructuring, the amount of the loan principal for which we are not reasonably assured of repayment is charged-off, but not forgiven.
A borrower with a restructured loan must make a minimum of six consecutive monthly payments at the restructured level and be current as to both interest and principal to be placed back on accrual status.
Performing TDRs (not reported as nonaccrual loans) totaled $25.1 million and $28.7 million with related allowances of $390,000 and $530,000 as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Non-performing TDRs totaled $3.0 million and $3.5 million with related allowances of $0 and $603,000 as of December 31, 2016 and
21
December 31, 2015, respectively. All TDRs are classified as impaired loans and are included in the impaired loan disclosures above.
There were no loans modified as TDRs during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Some loan modifications classified as TDRs may not ultimately result in the full collection of principal and interest, as modified, and result in potential incremental losses. These potential incremental losses have been factored into our overall allowance for loan losses estimate. The level of any re-defaults will likely be affected by future economic conditions. Once a loan becomes a TDR, it will continue to be reported as a TDR until it is repaid in full, foreclosed, sold or it meets the criteria to be removed from TDR status.
Credit Quality Indicators: As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the Company's loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including trends related to the risk grades of loans, the level of classified loans, net charge-offs, nonperforming loans (see details above) and the general economic conditions in the region.
The Company utilizes a risk grading matrix to assign a risk grade to each of its loans. Loans are graded on a scale of 1 to 7. Grades 1 through 4 are considered “Pass”. A description of the general characteristics of the seven risk grades is as follows:
1. | Good: Borrower exhibits the strongest overall financial condition and represents the most creditworthy profile. |
2. | Satisfactory (A): Borrower reflects a well-balanced financial condition, demonstrates a high level of creditworthiness and typically will have a strong banking relationship with Parke Bank. |
3. | Satisfactory (B): Borrower exhibits a balanced financial condition and does not expose the Bank to more than a normal or average overall amount of risk. Loans are considered fully collectable. |
4. | Watch List: Borrower reflects a fair financial condition, but there exists an overall greater than average risk. Risk is deemed acceptable by virtue of increased monitoring and control over borrowings. Probability of timely repayment is present. |
5. | Other Assets Especially Mentioned (OAEM): Financial condition is such that assets in this category have a potential weakness or pose unwarranted financial risk to the Bank even though the asset value is not currently impaired. The asset does not currently warrant adverse classification but if not corrected could weaken and could create future increased risk exposure. Includes loans which require an increased degree of monitoring or servicing as a result of internal or external changes. |
6. | Substandard: This classification represents more severe cases of #5 (OAEM) characteristics that require increased monitoring. Assets are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral. Asset has a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that impairs the ability to repay debt and jeopardizes the timely liquidation or realization of the collateral at the asset’s net book value. |
7. | Doubtful: Assets which have all the weaknesses inherent in those assets classified #6 (Substandard) but the risks are more severe relative to financial deterioration in capital and/or asset value; accounting/evaluation techniques may be questionable and the overall possibility for collection in full is highly improbable. Borrowers in this category require constant monitoring, are considered work out loans and present the potential for future loss to the Bank. |
22
An analysis of the credit risk profile by internally assigned grades as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, is as follows:
At December 31, 2016 | Pass | OAEM | Substandard | Doubtful | Total | ||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | $ | 26,515 | $ | 121 | $ | 138 | $ | — | $ | 26,774 | |||||||||
Real Estate Construction: | |||||||||||||||||||
Residential | 8,825 | — | — | — | 8,825 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial | 35,656 | 12,516 | 10,297 | — | 58,469 | ||||||||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | 120,166 | 3,302 | 430 | — | 123,898 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | 261,181 | 79 | 6,863 | — | 268,123 | ||||||||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 304,042 | 1,536 | 3,762 | — | 309,340 | ||||||||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | 39,496 | — | 308 | — | 39,804 | ||||||||||||||
Consumer | 16,612 | — | 108 | — | 16,720 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 812,493 | $ | 17,554 | $ | 21,906 | $ | — | $ | 851,953 | |||||||||
At December 31, 2015 | Pass | OAEM | Substandard | Doubtful | Total | ||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | $ | 25,658 | $ | 688 | $ | 794 | $ | — | $ | 27,140 | |||||||||
Real Estate Construction: | |||||||||||||||||||
Residential | 7,750 | — | — | — | 7,750 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial | 24,210 | 15,831 | 5,204 | — | 45,245 | ||||||||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | 163,765 | 7,225 | 1,050 | — | 172,040 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | 242,607 | 7,044 | 6,820 | — | 256,471 | ||||||||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 207,911 | 515 | 4,840 | — | 213,266 | ||||||||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | 17,757 | — | 356 | — | 18,113 | ||||||||||||||
Consumer | 18,475 | — | 1 | — | 18,476 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 708,133 | $ | 31,303 | $ | 19,065 | $ | — | $ | 758,501 | |||||||||
Note 5. Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is a reserve established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense, which represents management's best estimate of probable losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance, in the judgment of management, is necessary to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The Company's allowance for loan loss methodology includes allowance allocations calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 310, "Receivables" and allowance allocations calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 450, "Contingencies." Accordingly, the methodology is based on historical loss experience by type of credit and internal risk grade, specific homogeneous risk pools and specific loss allocations, with adjustments for current events and conditions. The Company's process for determining the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses is designed to account for credit deterioration as it occurs. The provision for loan losses reflects loan quality trends, including the levels of, and trends related to, nonaccrual loans, past due loans, potential problem loans, criticized loans and net charge-offs or recoveries, among other factors. The provision for possible loan losses also reflects the totality of actions taken on all loans for a particular period. In other words, the amount of the provision reflects not only the necessary increases in the allowance for loan losses related to newly identified criticized loans, but it also reflects actions taken related to other loans including, among other things, any necessary increases or decreases in required allowances for specific loans or loan pools.
The level of the allowance reflects management's continuing evaluation of industry concentrations, specific credit risks, loan loss experience, current loan portfolio quality, present economic, political and regulatory conditions and unidentified
23
losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. Portions of the allowance may be allocated for specific credits; however, the entire allowance is available for any credit that, in management's judgment, should be charged off. While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of the allowance is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond the Company’s control, including, among other things, the performance of the Company's loan portfolio, the economy, changes in interest rates and the view of the regulatory authorities toward loan classifications.
The allowances established for probable losses on specific loans are based on a regular analysis and evaluation of problem loans. Loans are classified based on an internal credit risk grading process that evaluates, among other things: (i) the obligor's ability to repay; (ii) the underlying collateral, if any; and (iii) the economic environment and industry in which the borrower operates. This analysis is performed at the relationship manager level for all commercial loans. When a loan has a grade of 6 or higher, the loan is analyzed to determine whether the loan is impaired and, if impaired, the need to specifically allocate a portion of the allowance for loan losses to the loan. Specific valuation allowances are determined by analyzing the borrower's ability to repay amounts owed, collateral deficiencies, the relative risk grade of the loan and economic conditions affecting the borrower's industry, among other things.
Historical valuation allowances are calculated based on the historical loss experience of specific types of loans. The Company calculates historical loss ratios for pools of similar loans with similar characteristics based on the proportion of actual charge-offs experienced to the total population of loans in the pool. The historical loss ratios are periodically updated based on actual charge-off experience. A historical valuation allowance is established for each pool of similar loans based upon the product of the historical loss ratio and the total dollar amount of the loans in the pool. The Company's pools of similar loans include similarly risk-graded groups of commercial loans, commercial real estate loans, consumer real estate loans and consumer and other loans.
General valuation allowances are based on general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal and external to the Company. In general, such valuation allowances are determined by evaluating, among other things: (i) the experience, ability and effectiveness of the bank's lending management and staff; (ii) the effectiveness of the Bank's loan policies, procedures and internal controls; (iii) changes in asset quality; (iv) changes in loan portfolio volume; (v) the composition and concentrations of credit; (vi) the impact of competition on loan structuring and pricing; (vii) the effectiveness of the internal loan review function; (viii) the impact of environmental risks on portfolio risks; and (ix) the impact of rising interest rates on portfolio risk. Management evaluates the degree of risk that each one of these components has on the quality of the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis. Each component is determined to have either a high, high-moderate, moderate, low-moderate or low degree of risk. The results are then input into a "general allocation matrix" to determine an appropriate general valuation allowance.
An analysis of the allowance for loan losses as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, is as follows:
Allowance for Loan Losses: | For the year ended December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance | Charge-offs | Recoveries | Provisions | Ending Balance | |||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | $ | 952 | $ | (76 | ) | $ | 8 | $ | 304 | $ | 1,188 | ||||||||
Real Estate Construction: | |||||||||||||||||||
Residential | 247 | — | — | 21 | 268 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial | 2,501 | (1,081 | ) | — | 1,076 | 2,496 | |||||||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | 3,267 | — | 1 | (1,186 | ) | 2,082 | |||||||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | 3,838 | (154 | ) | — | 205 | 3,889 | |||||||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 4,802 | (704 | ) | 39 | 779 | 4,916 | |||||||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | 254 | (45 | ) | — | 296 | 505 | |||||||||||||
Consumer | 275 | (6 | ) | — | (33 | ) | 236 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 16,136 | $ | (2,066 | ) | $ | 48 | $ | 1,462 | $ | 15,580 | ||||||||
24
Allowance for Loan Losses: | For the year ended December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance | Charge-offs | Recoveries | Provisions | Ending Balance | |||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | $ | 1,679 | $ | (1,554 | ) | $ | 121 | $ | 706 | $ | 952 | ||||||||
Real Estate Construction: | |||||||||||||||||||
Residential | 316 | (238 | ) | — | 169 | 247 | |||||||||||||
Commercial | 3,015 | (2,745 | ) | — | 2,231 | 2,501 | |||||||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | 3,296 | — | 66 | (95 | ) | 3,267 | |||||||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | 4,962 | (638 | ) | 398 | (884 | ) | 3,838 | ||||||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 4,156 | (504 | ) | 148 | 1,002 | 4,802 | |||||||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | 357 | — | — | (103 | ) | 254 | |||||||||||||
Consumer | 262 | (1 | ) | — | 14 | 275 | |||||||||||||
Unallocated | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 18,043 | $ | (5,680 | ) | $ | 733 | $ | 3,040 | $ | 16,136 | ||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses, at December 31, 2016 | Individually evaluated for impairment | Collectively evaluated for impairment | Total | ||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | $ | 138 | $ | 1,050 | $ | 1,188 | |||||
Real Estate Construction: | |||||||||||
Residential | — | 268 | 268 | ||||||||
Commercial | 155 | 2,341 | 2,496 | ||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | |||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | 498 | 1,584 | 2,082 | ||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | 226 | 3,663 | 3,889 | ||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 234 | 4,682 | 4,916 | ||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | — | 505 | 505 | ||||||||
Consumer | — | 236 | 236 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 1,251 | $ | 14,329 | $ | 15,580 | |||||
Allowance for Loan Losses, at December 31, 2015 | Individually evaluated for impairment | Collectively evaluated for impairment | Total | ||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | $ | 67 | $ | 885 | $ | 952 | |||||
Real Estate Construction: | |||||||||||
Residential | — | 247 | 247 | ||||||||
Commercial | 1,149 | 1,352 | 2,501 | ||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | |||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | 73 | 3,194 | 3,267 | ||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | 486 | 3,352 | 3,838 | ||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 709 | 4,093 | 4,802 | ||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | 5 | 249 | 254 | ||||||||
Consumer | — | 275 | 275 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 2,489 | $ | 13,647 | $ | 16,136 | |||||
25
Loans, at December 31, 2016: | Individually evaluated for impairment | Collectively evaluated for impairment | Total | ||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | $ | 159 | $ | 26,615 | $ | 26,774 | |||||
Real Estate Construction: | |||||||||||
Residential | — | 8,825 | 8,825 | ||||||||
Commercial | 8,386 | 50,083 | 58,469 | ||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | |||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | 4,380 | 119,518 | 123,898 | ||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | 19,000 | 249,123 | 268,123 | ||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 4,065 | 305,275 | 309,340 | ||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | 308 | 39,496 | 39,804 | ||||||||
Consumer | 107 | 16,613 | 16,720 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 36,405 | $ | 815,548 | $ | 851,953 | |||||
Loans, at December 31, 2015: | Individually evaluated for impairment | Collectively evaluated for impairment | Total | ||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | $ | 1,183 | $ | 25,957 | $ | 27,140 | |||||
Real Estate Construction: | |||||||||||
Residential | — | 7,750 | 7,750 | ||||||||
Commercial | 7,117 | 38,128 | 45,245 | ||||||||
Real Estate Mortgage: | |||||||||||
Commercial – Owner Occupied | 4,698 | 167,342 | 172,040 | ||||||||
Commercial – Non-owner Occupied | 24,584 | 231,887 | 256,471 | ||||||||
Residential – 1 to 4 Family | 4,284 | 208,982 | 213,266 | ||||||||
Residential – Multifamily | 356 | 17,757 | 18,113 | ||||||||
Consumer | — | 18,476 | 18,476 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 42,222 | $ | 716,279 | $ | 758,501 | |||||
Note 6. Company Premises and Equipment
A summary of the cost and accumulated depreciation and amortization of Company premises and equipment as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:
Estimated Useful lives | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||||
Land | $ | 820 | $ | 820 | |||||
Building and improvements | 12 years | 5,352 | 4,973 | ||||||
Furniture and equipment | 9.6 years | 2,854 | 2,357 | ||||||
Total premises and equipment | 9,026 | 8,150 | |||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (3,829 | ) | (3,559 | ) | |||||
Premises and equipment, net | $ | 5,197 | $ | 4,591 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization expense was $270,000 and $251,000 in 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The Company has non-cancelable operating lease agreements related to its Northfield and Philadelphia branch offices. The term of the Northfield lease is for 5 years and runs through May 2017 with one 5-year renewal option. The term
26
of the Philadelphia lease is for 10 years and runs through June 2016 was renewed with two 5-year renewal options. The Company entered into a land lease for its branch in Collingswood. The term of the lease is for 99 years of which 88 years remain. The Company is responsible for its pro-rata share of real estate taxes, and all insurance, utilities, maintenance and repair costs for the benefit of the branch offices. On June 1, 2016, the Company entered into a 10 year lease for its Arch Street Branch, located in Philadelphia. The Branch opened in December 2016. On July 1, 2016, the Company entered into a 1 year lease agreement for a Commercial Loan office in Hamilton N.J. At December 31, 2016, the required future minimum rental payments under these leases and other equipment operating leases are as follows:
Years Ending December 31, | (Amounts in thousands) | ||
2017 | 293 | ||
2018 | 303 | ||
2019 | 303 | ||
2020 | 303 | ||
2021 | 268 | ||
Total minimum lease payments | $ | 1,470 | |
Rent expense was approximately $220,000 in 2016 and $214,000 in 2015.
Note 7. OREO
Other Real Estate Owned (OREO) at December 31, 2016 was $10.5 million, compared to $16.6 million at December 31, 2015, a decrease of $6.1 million. The real estate owned at, December 31, 2016, consisted of 16 properties, the largest being a condominium development at $3.3 million. During 2016, the Company disposed of $5.2 million of OREO, recognizing a gain of $206,000, compared to $7.6 million of OREO sold in 2015, recognizing a loss of $1,076,000. Also during 2016, the Company wrote down OREO property by $2,036,000, compared to $943,000 of write-downs in 2015, based on a decline in appraised values. Operating expenses related to OREO, net of related income, for 2016 and 2015, were $935,000 and $1.5 million, respectively.
An analysis of OREO activity for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
2016 | 2015 | ||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 16,629 | $ | 20,931 | |||
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans | 788 | 5,154 | |||||
Sales of real estate | (5,222 | ) | (7,576 | ) | |||
Gain (loss) on sale of real estate | 206 | (1,076 | ) | ||||
Write-down of real estate carrying values | (2,036 | ) | (943 | ) | |||
Donated property | (31 | ) | — | ||||
Capitalized improvements to real estate | 194 | 139 | |||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 10,528 | $ | 16,629 | |||
27
Note 8. Deposits
Deposits at December 31, 2016 and 2015, consisted of the following:
2016 | 2015 | ||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||
Demand deposits, noninterest-bearing | $ | 92,535 | $ | 52,773 | |||
Demand deposits, interest-bearing | 37,456 | 33,407 | |||||
Money market deposits | 134,433 | 122,264 | |||||
Savings deposits | 181,603 | 176,282 | |||||
Time deposits of $250,000 or more | 36,643 | 33,709 | |||||
Other time deposits | 254,795 | 225,876 | |||||
Brokered time deposits | 51,229 | 20,899 | |||||
Total deposits | $ | 788,694 | $ | 665,210 | |||
Scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit at December 31, 2016 are as follows:
Years Ending December 31, | (Amounts in thousands) | ||
2017 | $ | 266,724 | |
2018 | 46,231 | ||
2019 | 15,517 | ||
2020 | 6,706 | ||
2021 | 7,469 | ||
Thereafter | 20 | ||
Total | $ | 342,667 | |
Deposits from related parties totaled approximately $4,767,000 and $4,980,000 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Note 9. Borrowings
An analysis of borrowings as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:
2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||
Maturity Date or Range | Amount | Weighted Average Rate | Amount | Weighted Average Rate | |||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands, except rates) | |||||||||||||||
Borrowed funds: | |||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances | Less than one year | $ | 39,500 | 1.13 | % | $ | 24,150 | 0.73 | % | ||||||
One to three years | 34,150 | 1.57 | % | 54,500 | 1.44 | % | |||||||||
Three to five years | 6,000 | 1.85 | % | 6,000 | 1.85 | % | |||||||||
Five to ten years | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 79,650 | $ | 84,650 | |||||||||||
Subordinated debentures, capital trusts | November 2035 | $ | 5,155 | 2.58 | % | $ | 5,155 | 2.04 | % | ||||||
November 2035 | 5,155 | 2.58 | % | 5,155 | 2.04 | % | |||||||||
September 2037 | 3,093 | 2.46 | % | 3,093 | 2.01 | % | |||||||||
Total | $ | 13,403 | $ | 13,403 | |||||||||||
At December 31, 2016, the Company had a $144.2 million line of credit from the FHLBNY, of which $79.7 million, as detailed above, was outstanding.
28
Certain investment securities (Note 3), loans (Note 4), and FHLBNY stock are pledged as collateral for borrowings.
Subordinated Debentures – Capital Trusts: On August 23, 2005, Parke Capital Trust I, a Delaware statutory business trust and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, issued $5,000,000 of variable rate capital trust pass-through securities to investors. The variable interest rate re-prices quarterly at the three-month LIBOR plus 1.66% and was 2.58% at December 31, 2016. Parke Capital Trust I purchased $5,155,000 of variable rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures from the Company. The debentures are the sole asset of the Trust. The terms of the junior subordinated debentures are the same as the terms of the capital securities. The Company has also fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of the Trust under the capital securities. The capital securities are redeemable by the Company on or after November 23, 2010, at par, or earlier if the deduction of related interest for federal income taxes is prohibited, classification as Tier 1 Capital is no longer allowed, or certain other contingencies arise. The capital securities must be redeemed upon final maturity of the subordinated debentures on November 23, 2035. Proceeds of approximately $4.2 million were contributed to paid-in capital at the Bank. The remaining $955 thousand was retained at the Company for future use.
On August 23, 2005, Parke Capital Trust II, a Delaware statutory business trust and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, issued $5,000,000 of fixed/variable rate capital trust pass-through securities to investors. Currently, the interest rate is variable at 2.58%. The variable interest rate re-prices quarterly at the three-month LIBOR plus 1.66% beginning November 23, 2010. Parke Capital Trust II purchased $5,155,000 of variable rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures from the Company. The debentures are the sole asset of the Trust. The terms of the junior subordinated debentures are the same as the terms of the capital securities. The Company has also fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of the Trust under the capital securities. The capital securities are redeemable by the Company on or after November 23, 2010, at par, or earlier if the deduction of related interest for federal income taxes is prohibited, classification as Tier 1 Capital is no longer allowed, or certain other contingencies arise. The capital securities must be redeemed upon final maturity of the subordinated debentures on November 23, 2035. Proceeds of approximately $4.2 million were contributed to paid-in capital at the Bank. The remaining $955 thousand was retained at the Company for future use.
On June 21, 2007, Parke Capital Trust III, a Delaware statutory business trust and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, issued $3,000,000 of variable rate capital trust pass-through securities to investors. The variable interest rate re-prices quarterly at the three-month LIBOR plus 1.50% and was 2.46% at December 31, 2016. Parke Capital Trust III purchased $3,093,000 of variable rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures from the Company. The debentures are the sole asset of the Trust. The terms of the junior subordinated debentures are the same as the terms of the capital securities. The Company has also fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of the Trust under the capital securities. The capital securities are redeemable by the Company on or after December 15, 2012, at par, or earlier if the deduction of related interest for federal income taxes is prohibited, classification as Tier 1 Capital is no longer allowed, or certain other contingencies arise. The capital securities must be redeemed upon final maturity of the subordinated debentures on September 15, 2037. The proceeds were contributed to paid-in capital at the Bank.
Note 10. Income Taxes
Income tax expense for 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following:
2016 | 2015 | ||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||
Current tax expense: | |||||||
Federal | $ | 6,826 | $ | 6,007 | |||
State | 1,564 | 1,026 | |||||
8,390 | 7,033 | ||||||
Deferred tax expense (benefit) | 305 | (190 | ) | ||||
Income tax expense | $ | 8,695 | $ | 6,843 | |||
29
The components of the net deferred tax asset at December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:
2016 | 2015 | ||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||
Deferred tax assets: | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses | $ | 5,845 | $ | 6,068 | |||
Depreciation | 268 | 280 | |||||
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ("SERP") | 1,511 | 1,343 | |||||
OREO writedowns | 1,839 | 1,894 | |||||
OTTI write down on securities | 65 | 65 | |||||
Nonaccrued interest | 1,806 | 2,048 | |||||
Partnership Income | 76 | 71 | |||||
Non-qualified stock options | 25 | — | |||||
Write-down on partnership investment | 181 | — | |||||
Unrealized gain | 233 | 110 | |||||
11,849 | 11,879 | ||||||
Valuation allowance | (181 | ) | — | ||||
Deferred tax Liabilities: | |||||||
Deferred loan costs | (922 | ) | (951 | ) | |||
Net deferred tax asset | $ | 10,746 | $ | 10,928 | |||
A reconciliation of the Company’s effective income tax rate with the statutory federal rate for 2016 and 2015 is as follows:
2016 | 2015 | ||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||
At Federal statutory rate | $ | 9,397 | $ | 6,387 | |||
Adjustments resulting from: | |||||||
State income taxes, net of Federal tax benefit | 1,009 | 854 | |||||
Noncontrolling interest | (147 | ) | (423 | ) | |||
Tax exempt income | (32 | ) | (31 | ) | |||
BOLI | (246 | ) | (121 | ) | |||
Nondeductible expenses | 1 | 4 | |||||
Tax credit | (1,532 | ) | — | ||||
Increase in Valuation reserve | 164 | — | |||||
Other | 81 | 173 | |||||
$ | 8,695 | $ | 6,843 | ||||
Management has evaluated the Company’s tax positions and concluded that the Company has taken no uncertain tax positions that require adjustments to the financial statements. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to income tax examinations by the U.S. federal or local tax authorities for years before 2013, and by the State of New Jersey for years before 2012. The Company recorded a valuation allowance relating to the write down of a partnership investment. Management has concluded that these capital losses will not be realizable once incurred.
The Company recorded income tax expense of $8.7 million on income before taxes of $27.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, resulting in an effective tax rate of 31.5%, compared to income tax expense of $6.8 million on income before taxes of $18.8 million for the same period of 2015, resulting in an effective tax rate of 36.4%. The decrease in the effective rate is due to using an annualized tax rate versus using a monthly tax rate. The increase in our tax expense is due to the gain on sale of our SBA business of $7.6 million. The decrease in the effective rate is due to the Bank utilizing a $1.5 million Historic Tax Credit ("HTC") offset by a $482,000 write down (included in non-interest expense) of the HTC partnership investment. This resulted in a net benefit to the Company of $1.0 million, which reduced the Bank's income tax expense.
30
Note 11. Retirement Plans
The Company has a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) covering certain members of management. The net periodic SERP pension cost was approximately $458,000 in 2016 and $221,000 in 2015. The unfunded benefit obligation, which was included in other liabilities, was approximately $4,029,000 at December 31, 2016 and $3,571,000 at December 31, 2015.
The benefit obligation at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was calculated as follows:
2016 | 2015 | ||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||
Benefit obligation, January 1 | $ | 3,571 | $ | 3,350 | |||
Service cost | (216 | ) | (86 | ) | |||
Interest cost | 199 | 214 | |||||
Loss | 475 | 93 | |||||
Benefit obligation, December 31 | $ | 4,029 | $ | 3,571 | |||
The net periodic pension cost for 2016 and 2015 was calculated as follows:
2016 | 2015 | ||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||
Service cost | $ | (216 | ) | $ | (86 | ) | |
Interest cost | 199 | 214 | |||||
Loss | 475 | 93 | |||||
$ | 458 | $ | 221 | ||||
The discount rate used in determining the actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation was 5.5% for both 2016 and 2015. Annual benefit payments are estimated at $0 for 2016, $136,149 for 2017, $336,437 for 2018, $368,506 for 2019, and $5,821,440 from 2020 through 2031.
The Company has a 401(k) Plan covering substantially all employees. Under the Plan, the Company is required to contribute 3% of all qualifying employees’ eligible salary to the Plan. The Plan expense in 2016 was $132,000 and $138,000 in 2015.
Note 12. Regulatory Matters
Banks and bank holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can result in regulatory action. The final rules implementing Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's capital guidelines for U.S. banks (Basel III rules) became effective for the Company on January 1, 2015 with full compliance with all of the requirements being phased in over a multi-year schedule, and fully phased in by January 1, 2019. Under the Basel III rules, the Company must hold a capital conservation buffer above the adequately capitalized risk-based capital ratios. The capital conservation buffer is being phased in from 0.0% for 2015 to 2.50% by 2019. The capital conservation buffer for 2016 was 0.625%. The net unrealized gain or loss on available for sale securities is not included in computing regulatory capital. Management believes as of December 31, 2016, the Company and Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required. At year-end 2016 and 2015, the most recent regulatory notifications categorized the Bank as well
31
capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution's category.
To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk based, Tier 1 risk based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the following tables.
Actual | For Capital Adequacy Purposes | To be Well- Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions | ||||||||||||||||||
Parke Bancorp, Inc. | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | ||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2016 | (Amounts in thousands except ratios) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Risk Based Capital | $ | 154,018 | 18.33 | % | $ | 72,470 | 8.625 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
(to Risk Weighted Assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital | $ | 143,453 | 17.07 | % | $ | 55,666 | 6.625 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
(to Risk Weighted Assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital Common Equity | $ | 110,453 | 13.15 | % | $ | 43,062 | 5.125 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
(to Risk Weighted Assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital | $ | 143,453 | 15.25 | % | $ | 37,618 | 4.000 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
(to Average Assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Risk Based Capital | $ | 135,258 | 17.24 | % | $ | 62,777 | 8.0 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
(to Risk Weighted Assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital | $ | 125,371 | 15.98 | % | $ | 31,389 | 6.0 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
(to Risk Weighted Assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital Common Equity | $ | 92,371 | 11.77 | % | $ | 31,389 | 4.5 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
(to Risk Weighted Assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital | $ | 125,371 | 14.69 | % | $ | 34,133 | 4.0 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
(to Average Assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Parke Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Risk Based Capital | $ | 150,636 | 17.93 | % | $ | 72,470 | 8.625 | % | $ | 84,023 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||
(to Risk Weighted Assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital | $ | 140,070 | 16.67 | % | $ | 55,665 | 6.625 | % | $ | 67,218 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||
(to Risk Weighted Assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital Common Equity | $ | 140,070 | 16.67 | % | $ | 43,062 | 5.125 | % | $ | 54,615 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||
(to Risk Weighted Assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital | $ | 140,070 | 15.29 | % | $ | 36,654 | 4.000 | % | $ | 45,818 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||
(to Average Assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Risk Based Capital | $ | 134,415 | 17.13 | % | $ | 62,777 | 8.0 | % | $ | 78,471 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||
(to Risk Weighted Assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital | $ | 124,528 | 15.87 | % | $ | 31,388 | 4.0 | % | $ | 62,777 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||
(to Risk Weighted Assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital Common Equity | $ | 124,528 | 15.87 | % | $ | 31,388 | 4.5 | % | $ | 51,006 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||
(to Risk Weighted Assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital | $ | 124,528 | 14.59 | % | $ | 34,133 | 4.0 | % | $ | 42,666 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||
(to Average Assets) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Note 13. Shareholders’ Equity
Common Stock Dividend: The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend each quarter of 2016. The first three quarters of 2016 the dividend was $0.08 per share. The dividend was increased to $0.10 per share in December of 2016 for payment on January. During 2016 the Company paid $2.0 million in dividends. The timing and amount of future dividends
32
will be within the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on the consolidated earnings, financial condition, liquidity, and capital requirements of the Company and its subsidiaries, applicable governmental regulations and policies, and other factors deemed relevant by the Board. In May 2016 the Company paid a 10% common stock dividend to shareholders (625,971 shares). All share and per share information have been retroactively adjusted to give effect to this stock dividend for the periods presented.
Treasury Stock: The Company, in 2015, announced plans to purchase up to 500,000 shares of its own stock. During the year ending December 31, 2016, the Company purchased 294 shares at an average cost of $12.54 per share, compared to the year ending December 31, 2015, when the Company purchased 69,454 shares at an average cost of $11.98 per share.
Stock Options: In 2015, the shareholders approved the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan is a "non-qualified" stock option plan. All directors and certain officers and employees of the Company have been granted options under the Plan. Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company's stock on the date of the grant. All options issued have a 10 year contractual term and vest over five years. All stock option amounts and prices included in the following discussions have been adjusted for stock dividends.
The method of determining pro-forma compensation expense for 2016 was based on certain assumptions, including the past trading ranges of the Company's stock, volatility of 29%, expected option lives of 5 years, risk free interest rate of 2.38%, and a dividend rate of 2.03%. Net compensation expense recognized during 2016 amounted to $65,500. The remaining unrecognized compensation expense at December 31, 2016 is $292,000 at $2.55 price per share.
The following table summarizes stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Options | Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | ||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2016 | 20,371 | $9.33 | ||||||||
Granted | 159,830 | $10.39 | ||||||||
Exercised | (20,371 | ) | $9.33 | |||||||
Expired/terminated | (2,970 | ) | $10.39 | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2016: | 156,860 | $10.39 | 9.8 | $ | 1,531,000 | |||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2016: | — | $— | 0.0 | $ | — | |||||
All outstanding options have an exercise price of $10.39. There were no outstanding exercisable options at December 31, 2016.
Preferred Stock: In December of 2013, the Company completed a private placement of newly designated 6.00% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share. The Company sold 20,000 shares in the placement for gross proceeds of $20.0 million. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder into 103.3446 shares of Common Stock. Upon full conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock, the Company will issue up to 2,066,891 shares of Common Stock assuming that the Conversion Rate does not change. The Conversion Rate and the total number of shares to be issued would be adjusted for stock dividends, stock splits and other corporate actions. The Conversion Rate was set using a conversion price for the common stock of $10.64, which was approximately 20% over the closing price of the Common Stock on October 10, 2013, the day the Series B Preferred Stock was priced.
The Company has recorded dividends on preferred stock in the approximate amount of $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 respectively. All dividend amounts through December 31, 2016 have been paid. The preferred stock qualifies for and is accounted for as equity securities and is included in the Company’s Tier I capital on the date of receipt.
Note 14. Other Related Party Transactions
33
A member of the Board of Directors is a principal of an employee benefits insurance agency that provides all the medical, life and disability insurance coverage for the Company. The cost of these employee benefits totaled $634,000 in 2016 and $562,000 in 2015.
Note 15. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company has entered into an employment contract with the President of the Company, which provides for continued payment of certain employment salaries and benefits in the event of a change in control, as defined. The Company has also entered into Change-in-Control Severance Agreements with certain officers which provide for the payment of severance in certain circumstances following a change in control.
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of the Company’s involvement in these particular classes of financial instruments. The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual or notional amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require the payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s credit-worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable; inventory; property, plant and equipment and income-producing commercial properties. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, commitments to extend credit amounted to approximately $76.7 million and $66.1 million, respectively.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, standby letters of credit with customers were $13.1 million and $14.2 million, respectively.
Loan commitments and standby letters of credit are issued in the ordinary course of business to meet customer needs. Commitments to fund fixed-rate loans were immaterial at December 31, 2016. Variable-rate commitments are generally issued for less than 1 year and carry market rates of interest. Such instruments are not likely to be affected by annual rate caps triggered by rising interest rates. Management believes that off-balance sheet risk is not material to the results of operations or financial condition.
In the normal course of business, there are outstanding various contingent liabilities such as claims and legal action, which are not reflected in the financial statements. In the opinion of management, no material losses are anticipated as a result of these actions or claims.
Note 16. Fair Value
Fair Value Measurements
The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820 of FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC"), the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company's various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.
34
The fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions. In accordance with this guidance, the Company groups its assets and liabilities carried at fair value in three levels as follows:
Level 1 Input:
1) | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. |
Level 2 Inputs:
1) | Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets. |
2) | Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active. |
3) | Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for the term of the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates, yield curves, credit risks, prepayment speeds or volatilities) or “market corroborated inputs.” |
Level 3 Inputs:
1) | Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable (i.e. supported by little or no market activity) and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
2) | These assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. |
Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:
The following is a description of the Company’s valuation methodologies for assets carried at fair value. These methods may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Company believes that its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting measurement date.
Investment Securities Available for Sale:
Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified in Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Securities in Level 1 are exchange-traded equities. If quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, then fair values are provided by independent third-party valuations services. These valuations services estimate fair values using pricing models and other accepted valuation methodologies, such as quotes for similar securities and observable yield curves and spreads. As part of the Company’s overall valuation process, management evaluates these third-party methodologies to ensure that they are representative of exit prices in the Company’s principal markets. Securities in Level 2 include U.S. Government agencies, mortgage-backed securities and state and municipal securities.
Securities in Level 3 include thinly-traded and collateralized debt obligations (TruPS). With the assistance of competent third-party valuation specialists, the Company utilized the following methodology to determine the fair value:
Cash flows were developed based on the estimated speeds at which the TruPS are expected to prepay (a range of 1% to 2%), the estimated rates at which the TruPS are expected to defer payments, the estimated rates at which the TruPS are expected to default (a range of 0.57% to 0.66%), and the severity of the losses on securities which default 95%. TruPS generally allow for prepayment by the issuer without a prepayment penalty any time after five years. Due to the lack of new TruPS issuances and the relatively poor conditions of the financial institution industry, a relatively modest rate of prepayment was assumed going forward. Estimates for CDRs are based on the payment characteristics of the TruPS themselves (e.g. current, deferred, or defaulted) as well as the financial condition of the TruPS issuers in the pool. Estimates for the near-term rates of deferral and CDR are based on key financial ratios relating to the financial institutions’ capitalization, asset quality, profitability and liquidity. Finally, we consider whether or not the
35
financial institution has received TARP funding, and if it has, the amount. Longer-term rates of deferral and defaults are based on historical averages. The fair value of each bond was assessed by discounting its projected cash flows by a discount rate. The discount rates were based on the yields of publicly traded TruPS and preferred stock issued by comparably rated banks (3 month LIBOR plus a spread of 400 to 959 basis points).
The table below presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Financial Assets | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Securities Available for Sale | ||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt obligations | — | 1,011 | — | 1,011 | ||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities | — | 43,240 | — | 43,240 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage-backed securities | — | 166 | — | 166 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized debt obligations | — | — | 437 | 437 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | — | $ | 44,417 | $ | 437 | $ | 44,854 | ||||||||
As of December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt obligations | — | 1,031 | — | 1,031 | ||||||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities | — | 40,821 | — | 40,821 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage-backed securities | — | 253 | — | 253 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized debt obligations | — | — | 462 | 462 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | — | $ | 42,105 | $ | 462 | $ | 42,567 | ||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no transfers between the levels within the fair value hierarchy.
The changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows for the years ended December 31:
Securities Available for Sale | |||||||
2016 | 2015 | ||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||
Beginning balance at January 1, | $ | 462 | $ | 349 | |||
Net losses included in: | |||||||
Other comprehensive gain – CDO’s | — | 113 | |||||
Settlements | (25 | ) | — | ||||
Ending balance December 31, | $ | 437 | $ | 462 | |||
Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis:
Certain assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).
Financial Assets | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||
Collateral dependent impaired loans | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 16,070 | $ | 16,070 | ||||||||
OREO | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 10,528 | $ | 10,528 | ||||||||
As of December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||
Collateral dependent impaired loans | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 20,066 | $ | 20,066 | ||||||||
OREO | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 16,629 | $ | 16,629 | ||||||||
36
Collateral dependent impaired loans, which are measured in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 310 Receivables, for impairment, had a carrying amount of $36.4 million and $42.2 million at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, with a valuation allowance of $1.3 million and $2.5 million at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The valuation allowance for collateral dependent impaired loans is included in the allowance for loan losses on the balance sheet. All collateral dependent impaired loans have an independent third-party full appraisal to determine the NRV based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, less cost to sell (a range of 5% to 10%) and other costs, such as unpaid real estate taxes, that have been identified, or the present value of discounted cash flows in the case of certain impaired loans that are not collateral dependent. The appraisal will be based on an "as-is" valuation and will follow a reasonable valuation method that addresses the direct sales comparison, income, and cost approaches to market value, reconciles those approaches, and explains the elimination of each approach not used. Appraisals are updated every 12 months or sooner if we have identified possible further deterioration in value.
OREO consists of real estate properties which are recorded at fair value. All properties have an independent third-party full appraisal to determine the fair value, less cost to sell (a range of 5% to 10%) and other costs, such as unpaid real estate taxes, that have been identified. The appraisal will be based on an "as-is" valuation and will follow a reasonable valuation method that addresses the direct sales comparison, income, and cost approaches to market value, reconciles those approaches, and explains the elimination of each approach not used. Appraisals are updated every 12 months or sooner if we have identified possible further deterioration in value.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company discloses estimated fair values for its significant financial instruments in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 825, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis are discussed above. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of other financial assets and liabilities are discussed below.
For certain financial assets and liabilities, carrying value approximates fair value due to the nature of the financial instrument. These instruments include cash and cash equivalents, restricted stock, accrued interest receivable, demand and other non-maturity deposits and accrued interest payable.
The Company used the following methods and assumptions in estimating the fair value of the following financial instruments:
Investment Securities: Fair value of securities available for sale is described above. Fair value of held to maturity securities is based upon quoted market prices (Level 2 inputs).
Loans Held for Sale: Fair value represents the face value of the guaranteed portion of SBA loans pending settlement.
Loans (other than impaired): Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, residential mortgage and other consumer. Each loan category is further segmented into groups by fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and non-performing categories. The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through their estimated maturity, using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in each group of loans (Level 2 inputs). The estimate of maturity is based on contractual maturities for loans within each group, or on the Company’s historical experience with repayments for each loan classification, modified as required by an estimate of the effect of current economic conditions.
Deposits: The fair value of time deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows, where the discount rate is estimated using the market rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities (Level 2 inputs).
Borrowings: The fair values of FHLBNY borrowings, other borrowed funds and subordinated debt are based on the discounted value of estimated cash flows. The discounted rate is estimated using market rates currently offered for similar advances or borrowings (Level 2 inputs).
Bank premises and equipment, customer relationships, deposit base and other information required to compute the Company’s aggregate fair value are not included in the above information. Accordingly, the above fair values are not intended to represent the aggregate fair value of the Company.
37
The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and fair values for financial instruments at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
Level in Fair Value Hierarchy | December 31, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||
Carrying Value | Fair Value | Carrying Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Financial Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | Level 1 | $ | 70,720 | 70,720 | $ | 27,429 | $ | 27,429 | ||||||||
Investment securities AFS | (1) | 44,854 | 44,854 | 42,567 | 42,567 | |||||||||||
Investment securities HTM | Level 2 | 2,224 | 2,411 | 2,181 | 2,471 | |||||||||||
Restricted stock | Level 2 | 4,658 | 4,658 | 4,789 | 4,789 | |||||||||||
Loans held for sale | Level 2 | — | — | 2,640 | 2,640 | |||||||||||
Loans, net | (2) | 836,373 | 844,290 | 742,365 | 743,604 | |||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable | Level 2 | 3,117 | 3,117 | 3,012 | 3,012 | |||||||||||
Financial Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
Demand and savings deposits | Level 2 | $ | 446,026 | 446,027 | $ | 384,726 | $ | 384,726 | ||||||||
Time deposits | Level 2 | 342,668 | 344,300 | 280,484 | 282,080 | |||||||||||
Borrowings | Level 2 | 93,053 | 90,362 | 98,053 | 95,492 | |||||||||||
Accrued interest payable | Level 2 | 655 | 655 | 494 | 494 | |||||||||||
(1) See the recurring fair value table above.
(2) For non-impaired loans, Level 2; for impaired loans, Level 3.
38
Note 17. Parent Company Only Financial Statements
Condensed financial information of the parent company only is presented in the following two tables:
Balance Sheets | December 31, | ||||||
2016 | 2015 | ||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||
Assets: | |||||||
Cash | $ | 1,317 | $ | 1,540 | |||
Investments in subsidiaries | 140,103 | 124,599 | |||||
Other assets | 5 | 5 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 141,425 | $ | 126,144 | |||
Liabilities and Equity: | |||||||
Subordinated debentures | $ | 13,403 | $ | 13,403 | |||
Other liabilities | 954 | 700 | |||||
Equity | 127,068 | 112,041 | |||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 141,425 | $ | 126,144 | |||
Statements of Income | Years ended December 31, | ||||||
2016 | 2015 | ||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||
Income: | |||||||
Dividends from bank subsidiary | $ | 3,400 | $ | 2,657 | |||
Other income | — | — | |||||
Total income | 3,400 | 2,657 | |||||
Expense: | |||||||
Interest on subordinated debentures | 311 | 259 | |||||
Salary | 160 | 160 | |||||
Other expenses | 118 | 101 | |||||
Total expenses | 589 | 520 | |||||
Net Income | 2,811 | 2,137 | |||||
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries | 15,698 | 8,560 | |||||
Net income | 18,509 | 10,697 | |||||
Preferred stock dividend and discount accretion | (1,200 | ) | (1,200 | ) | |||
Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 17,309 | $ | 9,497 | |||
39
Statements of Cash Flows | |||||||
Years ended December 31, | |||||||
2016 | 2015 | ||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | |||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | |||||||
Net income | $ | 18,509 | $ | 10,697 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries | (15,698 | ) | (8,560 | ) | |||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||
Decrease in other assets | — | (51 | ) | ||||
Increase in accrued interest payable and other accrued liabilities | 254 | 436 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 3,065 | 2,522 | |||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | |||||||
Purchase of treasury stock | (4 | ) | (831 | ) | |||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | — | 2,749 | |||||
Payment of dividend on preferred stock and common stock | (3,264 | ) | (2,661 | ) | |||
Other, net | (20 | ) | (377 | ) | |||
Net cash used in financing activities | (3,288 | ) | (1,120 | ) | |||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents | (223 | ) | 1,402 | ||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, January 1, | 1,540 | 138 | |||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, December 31, | $ | 1,317 | $ | 1,540 | |||
Note 18. Subsequent Events
Management has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of the financial statements and does not believe any such events warrant recording or disclosure in these financial statements.
40
PARKE BANCORP, INC. | PARKE BANK | ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENTS |
PARKE BANK | EXECUTIVE OFFICERS | |
Jennifer Chen | ||
BOARD OF DIRECTORS | Vito S. Pantilione | Renee D’Orazio |
President | Patricia Dilks | |
Celestino R. (“Chuck”) Pennoni | Chief Executive Officer | Annice Fanelli |
Chairman of the Board | Roxanne Melfe | |
Founder and Chairman of | Elizabeth A. Milavsky | Marysharon Mitchell |
Pennoni Associates | Executive Vice President | Joan Santo |
Chief Operating Officer | Maryann Seal | |
Daniel J. Dalton | Bart Seaman | |
Vice Chairman of the Board | John F. Hawkins | |
Retired | Senior Vice President | BANKING OFFICES |
Brown & Brown of New Jersey | Chief Financial Officer | www.parkebank.com |
Vito S. Pantilione | Linda Kaiser | WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP, NJ |
President | Corporate Secretary | Main Office |
Chief Executive Officer | 601 Delsea Drive | |
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENTS | (856) 256-2500 | |
Fred G. Choate | David O. Middlebrook | Roxanne Melfe, Manager |
President of Greater Philadelphia | Chief Credit Officer | |
Venture Capital Corporation | 567 Egg Harbor Road | |
Daniel Sulpizio | (856) 582-6900 | |
Arret F. Dobson | Director of Retail Banking | Brian Mickle, Manager |
Real Estate Developer | ||
Paul E. Palmieri | COLLINGSWOOD, NJ | |
Dr. Edward Infantolino | Senior Loan Officer | 1150 Haddon Avenue |
President of Ocean Internal | (856) 858-0825 | |
Medicine Associates, P.A. | Ralph Gallo | Jaime Brooks, Manager |
Chief Workout Officer | ||
Anthony J. Jannetti | GALLOWAY TOWNSHIP, NJ | |
President of Anthony J. Jannetti, Inc. | Dolores M. Calvello | 67 East Jimmie Leeds Road |
Loan Portfolio Manager | (609) 748-9700 | |
Jeffrey H. Kripitz | Juan Taboada, Manager | |
Owner of Jeff Kripitz Agency | VICE PRESIDENTS | |
Jaime Brooks | NORTHFIELD, NJ | |
Jack C. Sheppard, Jr. | Branch Manager | 501 Tilton Road |
Senior Vice President with Arthur J. | (609) 646-6677 | |
Gallagher & Company | Kathleen Conover | Kathleen Conover, Manager |
Branch Manager | ||
In Memoriam | PHILADELPHIA, PA | |
Ray H. Tresch | Gil Eubank | 1610 Spruce Street |
Founding Director 1999 - 2016 | Loan Administration | (215) 772-1113 |
Elvira Maxwell, Asst. Manager | ||
PARKE BANCORP, INC. | Anthony Lombardo | |
Controller | 1032 Arch Street | |
CORPORATE OFFICERS | (215) 982-1975 | |
Nicholas Pantilione | Jennifer Chen, Manager | |
Vito S. Pantilione | Commercial Lending | |
President | ||
Chief Executive Officer | Lisa Perkins | |
Information Technology | ||
Elizabeth A. Milavsky | ||
Executive Vice President | Yogendrakumar Shukla | |
Commercial Lending | ||
John F. Hawkins | ||
Senior Vice President | Marlon Soriano | |
Chief Financial Officer | Commercial Lending | |
Linda Kaiser | James Talarico | |
Corporate Secretary | Loan Workout | |
Frank Zangari | ||
Compliance | ||
41
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION | ||
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES | STOCK TRANSFER AND REGISTRAR | |
601 Delsea Drive | Shareholders wishing to change the name, address or | |
Washington Township, NJ 08080 | ownership of stock, to report lost certificates or to | |
(856) 256-2500 | consolidate accounts are asked to contact the Company's | |
www.parkebank.com | stock registrar and transfer agent directly: | |
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS | Computershare | |
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held on | Investor Services | |
April 18, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. at Terra Nova Restaurant, | P.O. Box 43078 | |
590 Delsea Drive, Sewell, New Jersey. | Providence, RI 02940-3078 | |
1-800-942-5909 | ||
INVESTOR RELATIONS | www.computershare.com | |
Copies of the Company’s earnings releases and | ||
financial publications, including the annual report on | INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM | |
Form 10-K (without exhibits) filed with the Securities | RSM US LLP | |
and Exchange Commission are available without | 751 Arbor Way, Suite 200 | |
charge by contacting: | Blue Bell, PA 19422 | |
Annice Fanelli, Assistant Vice President | SPECIAL COUNSEL | |
(856) 256-2500 or | Jones Walker LLP | |
investorsrelations@parkebank.com | 1227 25th Street, NW | |
Suite 200 | ||
Washington, DC 20037 | ||