First Majestic Silver Corp.: Exhibit 99.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

925 West Georgia Street, Suite 1800, Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6C 3L2
Phone: 604.688.3033 | Fax: 604.639.8873| Toll Free: 1.866.529.2807 | Email: info@firstmajestic.com
www.firstmajestic.com

Unless otherwise indicated, all information contained in this Annual Information Form ("AIF") of First Majestic Silver Corp. ("First Majestic" or the "Company") is as of December 31, 2021.

The Company's financial results are prepared and reported in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IFRS") and are presented in United States dollars.

Certain statements contained in this AIF constitute forward-looking information or forward-looking statements under applicable securities laws (collectively, "forward-looking statements"). These statements relate to future events or the Company's future performance, business prospects or opportunities that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management made in light of management's experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: the redemption and/or conversion of the Company's securities, statements with respect to the Company's business strategy, future planning processes, commercial mining operations, anticipated mineral recoveries, projected quantities of future mineral production, interpretation of drill results and other technical data, anticipated development, expansion, exploration activities and production rates and mine plans and mine life, the estimated cost and timing of plant improvements at the Company's operating mines and development of the Company's development projects, the timing of completion of exploration and drilling programs and preparation of technical reports, viability of the Company's projects, the restarting of operations at the Company's non‐operating mines, anticipated reclamation and decommissioning activities, conversion of mineral resources to proven and probable mineral reserves, potential metal recovery rates, analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable, statements with respect to the Company's future financial position including operating efficiencies, cash flow, capital budgets, costs and expenditures, cost savings, allocation of capital, the Company's share price, payment of dividends, statements with respect to the recovery of value added tax receivables and the tax regime in México, the conduct or outcome of outstanding litigation, regulatory proceedings, negotiations or proceedings under NAFTA (as hereinafter defined) or other claims, the Company's plans with respect to enforcement of certain judgments in favour of the Company and the likelihood of collection under those judgments, the Company's ability to comply with future legislation or regulations including proposed new Mexican outsourcing legislation or amendment to demonopolization legislation, the Company's intent to comply with future regulatory and compliance matters, future regulatory trends, future market conditions, future staffing levels and needs, assessment of future opportunities of the Company, payments of dividends by the Company, assumptions of management, maintaining relations with local communities, maintaining relations with employees, renewing contracts related to material properties and expectations regarding the continuing effect of the COVID-19 (as hereinafter defined) pandemic on the Company's operations, the global economy and the market for the Company's products and securities. All statements other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking statements. Statements concerning proven and probable mineral reserves and mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered as and if the property is developed, and in the case of Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources or Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves, such statements reflect the conclusion based on certain assumptions that the mineral deposit can be economically exploited. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as "seek", "anticipate", "plan", "continue", "estimate", "expect", "may", "will", "project", "predict", "forecast", "potential", "targeting", "intend", "could", "might", "should", "believe" and similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward-looking statements".

Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties relating to, among other things, global economic conditions, including public health threats, changes in commodity prices and, particularly, silver and gold prices, changes in exchange rates, access to skilled mining development and mill production personnel, labour relations, costs of labour, relations with local communities and aboriginal groups, results of exploration and development activities, accuracy of resource estimates, uninsured risks, defects in title, availability and costs of materials and equipment, inability to meet future financing needs on acceptable terms, changes in national or local governments, changes in applicable legislation or application thereof, timeliness of government approvals, actual performance of facilities, equipment, and processes relative to specifications and expectations and unanticipated environmental impacts on operations. Additional factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, the risk factors described herein. See "Risk Factors".

The Company believes that the expectations reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable, but no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct and such forward-looking statements included in, or incorporated by reference into, this AIF should not be unduly relied upon. These statements speak only as of the date of this AIF or as of the date specified in the documents incorporated by reference into this AIF, as the case may be. The Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements, except as required by applicable laws. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

Cautionary Notes to U.S. Investors Concerning Reserve and Resource Estimates

This AIF has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ from the requirements of United States securities laws. All mining terms used herein but not otherwise defined have the meanings set forth in National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101"). The definitions of Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves ("Mineral Reserves" or "Reserves") used in NI 43-101 differ from the definitions in the SEC Industry Guide 7. Under SEC Industry Guide 7 standards, a "final" or "bankable" feasibility study is required to report reserves, the three-year history average price is used in any reserve or cash flow analysis to designate reserves and the primary environmental analysis or report must be filed with the appropriate governmental authority.

In addition, the terms "Mineral Resource", "Measured Mineral Resource", "Indicated Mineral Resource" and "Inferred Mineral Resource" are defined in and required to be disclosed by NI 43-101; however, these terms are not defined terms under SEC Industry Guide 7 and normally are not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. "Inferred Mineral Resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian securities laws, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in certain specific cases. Additionally, disclosure of "contained ounces" in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian securities laws, however the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute "reserves" by SEC standards as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measurements.

Accordingly, information contained in this AIF containing descriptions of the Company's mineral deposits may not be comparable to similar information made public by U.S. companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of United States federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

The Company uses the US dollar as its presentation currency. This AIF contains references to both U.S. dollars and Canadian dollars. All dollar amounts (i.e. "$" or "US$"), unless otherwise indicated, are expressed in U.S. dollars and Canadian dollars are referred to as "C$".

On December 31, 2021, the exchange rate of Canadian dollars into US dollars, being the average exchange rate published by the Bank of Canada was US$1.00 equals C$1.27

Following is a description of certain technical terms and abbreviations used in this AIF.

"CCD" means counter-current decantation, a separation technique involving water or solution and a solid.

"HQ" means a standard wire line bit size which produces a core diameter of 63 millimetres.

"Indicated Mineral Resource" means that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape, physical characteristics are so well established that they can be estimated with a level of confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill-holes that are spaced closely enough for geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed.

"Inferred Mineral Resource" means that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological grade and continuity. The estimate is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill-holes.

"Life of Mine" or "LOM" means the time in which, through the employment of the available capital, the ore reserves, or such reasonable extension of the ore reserves as conservative geological analysis may justify, will be extracted.

"Measured Mineral Resource" means that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape, and physical characteristics are so well established that they can be estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support production planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill-holes that are spaced closely enough to confirm both geological and grade continuity.

"Merrill-Crowe" means a separation technique for extracting silver and gold from a cyanide solution.

"Mineral Reserve" means the economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource or Indicated Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. This study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic, and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified. A Mineral Reserve includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined.

"Mineral Resource" means a concentration or occurrence of diamonds, natural solid inorganic material, or natural solid fossilized organic material including base and precious metals, coal, and industrial minerals in or on the Earth's crust in such form and quantity and of such a grade or quality that it has reasonable prospects for economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics and continuity of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge.

"NQ" means a standard wire line bit size which produces a core diameter of 48 millimetres.

"Oxides" or "Oxide Ore" means a mixture of valuable minerals and gangue minerals from which at least one of the minerals can be extracted.

"Probable Mineral Reserve" means the economically mineable part of an Indicated Mineral Resource, and in some circumstances, a Measured Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. This study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic, and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified.

"Proven Mineral Reserve" means the economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. This study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic, and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction is justified.

"Specific Gravity" or "SG" means a measurement that determines the density of minerals.

"Sulphide Minerals" or "Sulphide Ore" means any member of a group of compounds of sulfur with one or more metals.

First Majestic is a company existing under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (the "BCBCA"). Since incorporation, First Majestic has undergone three name changes. The last name change occurred on November 22, 2006, when the Company adopted its current name.

The Company's head office is located at Suite 1800 - 925 W. Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C 3L2 and its registered office is located at 666 Burrard Street, Suite 2500, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 2X8.

The chart set out below illustrates the corporate structure of the Company and its material subsidiaries, their respective jurisdictions of incorporation, the percentage of voting securities held and their respective interests in the Company's material mining properties.

The Company is in the business of the production, development, exploration and acquisition of mineral properties with a focus on silver and gold production in México and the United States. As such, the Company's business is dependent on foreign operations in México and the United States. The Common Shares of the Company trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") under the symbol "FR" and on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "AG". The Company's Common Shares are also quoted on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the symbol "FMV".

The Company owns and operates three producing mines in México and one producing mine in the United States:

1. the San Dimas Silver/Gold Mine in Durango State ("San Dimas Silver/Gold Mine" or "San Dimas");

2. the Santa Elena Silver/Gold Mine in Sonora State ("Santa Elena Silver/Gold Mine" or "Santa Elena");

3. the La Encantada Silver Mine in Coahuila State ("La Encantada Silver Mine" or "La Encantada") and

4. the Jerritt Canyon Gold Mine in Elko, Nevada (the "Jerritt Canyon Gold Mine" or "Jerritt Canyon").

The Company also owns several non-material mines which are under care and maintenance:

1. the San Martín Silver Mine in Jalisco State ("San Martín Silver Mine" or "San Martín");

2. the La Parrilla Silver Mine in Durango State ("La Parrilla Silver Mine" or "La Parrilla");

3. the Del Toro Silver Mine in Zacatecas State ("Del Toro Silver Mine" or "Del Toro"); and

4. the La Guitarra Silver Mine in México State ("La Guitarra Silver Mine" or "La Guitarra").

The Company also owns two advanced-stage silver development projects in México: the La Luz Silver Project in San Luis Potosi State and La Joya Silver Project in Durango State (currently under option), as well as a number of exploration projects in México. The Company does not consider its mines under care and maintenance or its advanced-stage silver development projects to be material properties for the purposes of National Instrument 51-102 - Continuous Disclosure Obligations ("NI 51-102") or NI 43-101.

The Company's business is not materially affected by intangibles such as licences, patents and trademarks, nor is it significantly affected by seasonal changes other than weather. The Company is not aware of any aspect of its business that may be affected in the current financial year by renegotiation or termination of contracts.

At December 31, 2021, the Company had a total of 5,287 employees and/or contractors that consisted of the following: 44 the Vancouver corporate office, 219 in Durango, 28 at the México City office, four in Switzerland, three in Barbados, approximately 587 personnel at its Jerritt Canyon facility in Nevada and approximately 4,402l in various mining and project locations in México. Additional consultants are also retained from time to time for specific corporate activities, development and exploration programs.

Since inception in 2003, First Majestic has been in the business of production, development, exploration and acquisition of mineral properties with a focus on silver and gold production in México and the United States.

Over the past 19 years, the Company has assembled a portfolio of silver and gold mines, properties and projects which presently consists of three producing mines which it owns and operates in México, one producing mine in the United States, four mines under care and maintenance, and two advanced-stage development silver projects as well as a number of exploration projects.

In May 2019, the Company announced the departure of its Chief Operating Officer, Dustin VanDoorselaere.

In July 2019, the Company announced the appointment of Sophie Hsia as General Counsel.

In July 2019, the Company announced the temporary suspension of all mining and processing activities at the San Martin operation due to a growing level of insecurity in the area and safety concerns for the Company's workforce. The Company is continuing to work with authorities as they attempt to secure the area, although it is not known when that might occur.

The Company entered into an equity distribution agreement dated August 7, 2019 (the "2019 Sales Agreement") with BMO Capital pursuant to which the Company sold an aggregate of 4,437,957 Common Shares for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of $48.4 million (the "2019 ATM Offering"). The 2019 ATM Offering was made by way of a prospectus supplement dated August 7, 2019. Sales of Common Shares were made through "at-the-market distributions" as defined in NI 44-102 by means of ordinary brokers' transactions on the NYSE at prevailing market prices. No offers or sales of Common Shares were made in Canada on the TSX or other trading markets in Canada. The Company completed distributions under the 2019 ATM Offering on February 24, 2020.

The La Parrilla operation was placed on temporary suspension on September 2, 2019.

The Board of Directors appointed Dr. Nicole Adshead-Bell as a Director of the Company effective January 1, 2020.

On January 21, 2020, the Company announced that the Del Toro operations were being temporarily suspended in 2020 in order to improve the Company's cash flow and profit margins.

On February 3, 2020, the Company appointed Mr. Steven Holmes as Chief Operating Officer.

In March 2020, the Company sold its Plomosas Silver Project to GR Silver Mining Ltd. for total consideration of $1.7 million, consisting of 17,097,500 common shares of GR Silver with a fair value of $1.7 million on the measurement date, C$100,000 in cash and a 2% net smelter return royalty on the Plomosas project with half of the NSR being subject to a buy-back option for C$1,000,000.

On April 3, 2020, the Company announced the temporary suspension of operations at San Dimas, Santa Elena and La Encantada in accordance with the Mexican Ministry of Health's Federal Decree to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Operations resumed at each of these operations in June 2020.)

COVID-19 sanitary protocols were established in 2020 at all Company facilities and operations. These protocols included continuous monitoring and testing of workers, use of effective PPE, and other sanitary control measures. These measures have proven effective at managing the pandemic impacts on the Company's operations and remain in full effect. Worker availability has improved over the past several months; however, it continues to be a challenge but is currently being mitigated by increasing the use of temporary workers and contractors to replace vulnerable workers.

The Company also continues supporting local communities by sponsoring health professionals, medical and testing equipment, personal protective equipment, medicine and health supplements.

On May 13, 2020, as discussed below under "Risk Factors - Challenges to Advance Pricing Agreement", the Company announced that it had taken steps to serve the Government of México with a Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim (the "NAFTA Notice") under the provisions of Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement ("NAFTA") with respect to the Advance Pricing Agreement (the "APA") negotiated and finalized between the Mexican Taxation Authority, Servicio de Administracion Tributaria (the "SAT") and Primero Empresa Minera, S.A. de C.V. ("PEM"), the Company's Mexican subsidiary that owns and operates the San Dimas mine. The service of the NAFTA Notice by the Company on the Government of México initiated a 90‐day process for the Government of México to enter into good faith and amicable negotiations with the Company to resolve the current dispute between the Company and the Government of México. On August 11, 2020, this 90-day process expired without any resolution of the dispute.

On September 23, 2020, the Mexican Federal Court on Administrative Matters (the "Federal Court") issued a decision nullifying the APA and directing the tax authority to re-examine the evidence and basis for the issuance of the APA. On November 12, 2020, the Company announced that it had received the written reasons for the Federal Court's decision. In its decision, the Federal Court directed SAT to re-examine the evidence and basis for the issuance of the APA with retroactive effect, for the following key reasons: (i) the SAT's errors in analyzing PEM's request for the APA and the evidence provided in support of the request; and (ii) the SAT's failure to request from PEM certain additional information before issuing the APA. The SAT has not yet issued a new ruling. On November 30, 2020, the Company filed an appeal of the Federal Court's decision with the Circuit Courts.

The Company has been in negotiations with the SAT with respect to the APA since its acquisition of PEM in May 2018. The SAT has repeatedly and unilaterally rejected requests for dispute resolution procedures, known as mutual agreement procedures, contained in three separate double taxation treaties to which México is party with Canada, Barbados and Luxembourg. The SAT has taken actions which the Company considers to be contrary to law to secure amounts it claims are owed pursuant to its reassessments of PEM issued in violation of the terms of the APA. These notifications impose certain restrictions on PEM's ability to deal with its assets until this matter is resolved. The Company intends to continue to challenge the actions of the SAT in Mexican courts, however due to the ongoing COVID-19 crisis, the Mexican courts are currently available only on a restricted basis for further hearings on these matters and the outcome of such measures are uncertain.

The Company entered into an equity distribution agreement dated June 9, 2020, with BMO Capital and TD Securities (USA) LLC pursuant to which the Company sold an aggregate of 4,350,000 Common Shares for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of $55.5 million (the "2020 ATM Offering"). The 2020 ATM Offering was made by way of a prospectus supplement dated June 9, 2020. Sales of Common Shares were made through "at-the-market distributions" as defined in NI 44-102, by means of ordinary brokers' transactions on the NYSE at prevailing market prices. No offers or sales of Common Shares were made in Canada on the TSX or other trading markets in Canada. The Company completed distributions under the 2020 ATM Offering on September 2, 2020.

On June 9, 2020, Ana Lopez was elected as a director of the Company at the Company's Annual General Meeting of shareholders.

On June 11, 2020, the Company entered into a silver purchase agreement (the "Springpole Stream Agreement") with Gold Canyon Resources Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of First Mining Gold Corp. ("First Mining"), a company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, pursuant to which the Company acquired a stream on 50% of payable silver produced from First Mining's Springpole Gold Project ("Springpole"), a development stage asset located in Ontario, Canada which is not yet in production. The Company is required to pay First Mining total consideration of $22.5 million in cash and shares, over three payments, for the silver stream which covers the life of Springpole. The Company made an initial payment of $10.0 million on July 2, 2020, by paying $2.5 million in cash and by issuing 805,698 Common Shares to First Mining. In January 2021, upon the public announcement by First Mining of the results of a pre-feasibility study for Springpole the Company completed its second payment of $7.5 million to First Mining by paying $3.75 million in cash and issuing 287,300 Common Shares. The third and final payment of $5 million (consisting of $2.5 million in cash and $2.5 million in Common Shares of the Company) will be due upon receipt by First Mining of a federal or provincial environmental assessment approval for Springpole.

In addition, the Company is required to make ongoing cash payments of 33% of the silver spot price per ounce, to a maximum of $7.50 per ounce, for all payable silver delivered under the Springpole Stream Agreement. In connection with the Springpole Stream Agreement First Mining also granted the Company 30,000,000 common share purchase warrants, each of which will entitle the Company to purchase one common share of First Mining at C$0.40 over a period of five years. Raymond Polman (the Chief Financial Officer of the Company at the time) and Keith Neumeyer (the Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company) are directors of First Mining and abstained from voting on all matters related to the Springpole Stream Agreement.

In August 2020, First Majestic entered into a five-year option agreement with Silver Dollar Resources Inc. ("Silver Dollar") which gives Silver Dollar the option to earn an initial 80% interest in the Company's La Joya Silver Project, following the exercise of which it may earn an additional 20% interest for an aggregate 100% interest within five years of executing the option agreement.

On September 17, 2020, the Company completed the issuance of 5,000,000 Common Shares at a price of C$15.60 per Common Share to 2176423 Ontario Ltd., a company controlled by Eric Sprott, for gross proceeds of C$78,000,000 (the "Offering"). The Offering was completed on a bought deal basis pursuant to an underwriting agreement dated September 14, 2020, entered into by the Company and Cormark Securities Inc., as underwriter. The Offering was made pursuant to a prospectus supplement under its base shelf prospectus dated November 5, 2018.

On November 30, 2020, Dr. Nicole Adshead-Bell resigned as a director of the Company.

On December 7, 2020, the Company announced that it had adopted a dividend policy under which the Company intends to pay quarterly dividends of 1% of the Company's net revenues commencing after the completion of the first quarter of 2021. Payment of the dividends under the dividend policy will be subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors. The initial quarterly dividend for the first quarter of 2021 was paid in May 2021 and the Company has paid dividends for the second and third quarters of 2021. The Company will review the dividend policy on an ongoing basis and may amend the policy at any time in light of the Company's then current financial position, profitability, cash flow, debt covenant compliance, legal requirements and other factors considered relevant. See "Dividends" below.

On March 2, 2021, the Company announced that it had submitted a Request for Arbitration to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ("ICSID"), on its own behalf and on behalf of PEM, based on Chapter 11 of NAFTA. On March 31, 2021, the Notice of Registration of the Request for Arbitration was issued by the ICSID Secretariat.

On April 12 and 14, 2021, a Mexican Supreme Court Judge and SAT each submitted writs of certiorari to the Mexican Supreme Court of Justice to bypass consideration of the APA dispute by the Circuit Court. On April 15, 2021, the Plenary of the Supreme Court: i) admitted only one of those writs, ii) requested the Circuit Court to send the amparo file and iii) assigned such writ to the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court to issue the corresponding decision. The resolution of the admitted writ of certiorari remains outstanding.

On August 20, 2021, the NAFTA Arbitration Tribunal (the "Tribunal") was fully constituted by the appointment of all three panel members, and the NAFTA Arbitration Proceedings (the "NAFTA Proceedings") were deemed to have commenced. The first session of the NAFTA Proceedings was held by videoconference on September 24, 2021, to decide upon the procedural rules which will govern the NAFTA Proceedings. The Tribunal issued Procedural Order No. 1 on October 21, 2021.

On April 30, 2021, the Company completed the previously announced acquisition of all the issued and outstanding shares of Jerritt Canyon Canada Ltd. ("JC Canada") pursuant to a share purchase agreement dated March 11, 2021, with Sprott Mining Inc., a company controlled by Eric Sprott (the "Jerritt Canyon Acquisition"). The Company acquired all the issued and outstanding shares of JC Canada in exchange for the issuance of 26,719,727 Common Shares and 5,000,000 common share purchase warrants, each exercisable for one Common Share at a price of $20 per share for a period of three years, subject to a post-closing cash adjustment as described below. Further, the Company completed a private placement with Sprott Mining Inc. concurrent with closing of the Jerritt Canyon Acquisition, consisting of the issuance of 1,705,514 Common Shares to Sprott Mining Inc. for aggregate gross proceeds of $30 million. Pursuant to an agreed upon adjustment mechanism relating to certain tax liabilities of JC Canada, the purchase price for Jerritt Canyon was subsequently increased by approximately $12.5 million.

As a result of the Jerritt Canyon Acquisition, the Company now indirectly owns and operates Jerritt Canyon, in Elko County, Nevada.

Similar to the Company's Mexican Operations, sanitary protocol measures were implemented in Jerritt Canyon Gold in 2021 to prevent the spread of Covid-19 infection. These protocols have proven effective, and the operation did not experience any adverse impacts from the pandemic.

On May 18, 2021, the Company filed a final short form base shelf prospectus with the securities regulators in each province of Canada, except for the Province of Quebec, and a corresponding shelf registration statement on Form F-10 with the SEC. The base shelf prospectus and registration statement allows the Company to make offerings of Common Shares, subscription receipts, units, warrants or any combination thereof of up to $300 million during the 25-month period that the base shelf prospectus and registration statement are effective in the United States and Canada (except for the territories and the Province of Quebec).

On May 28, 2021, the Company entered into an equity distribution agreement (the "2021 Sales Agreement") with BMO Capital Markets Corp. and TD Securities (USA) LLC (the "Agents") pursuant to which the Company may, at its discretion and from time‐to‐time until June 18, 2023, sell, through the Agents, such number of Common Shares as would result in aggregate gross proceeds of up to $100 million. Sales of Common Shares are to be made through "at-the-market distributions" as defined in NI 44-102, including sales made directly on the NYSE, or any other recognized marketplace upon which the Common Shares are listed or quoted or where the Common Shares are traded in the United States. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company sold 4.2 million Common Shares under the ATM program at an average price of $15.78 per share for gross proceeds of $68.6 million or net proceeds of $66.7 million after costs. All sales of Common Shares made under the 2021 Sales Agreement were made by means of ordinary brokers' transactions on the NYSE at prevailing market prices. No offers or sales of Common Shares were made in Canada on the TSX or other trading markets in Canada.

On December 2, 2021, completed a private placement offering (the "Note Offering") of $230,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 0.375% unsecured convertible senior notes due 2027 (the "2027 Notes"). Upon conversion, holders of the 2027 Notes will receive Common Shares based on an initial conversion rate, subject to adjustment, of 60.3865 shares per $1,000 principal amount of 2027 Notes (which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $16.56 per share).

The 2027 Notes are governed by an indenture (the "Note Indenture") entered into between the Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. on December 2, 2021. A copy of the Note Indenture is available under the Company's profile at www.sedar.com.

The Company used a portion of the proceeds of the Note Offering to complete the repurchase, in separate privately negotiated transactions, of $125.2 million aggregate principal amount of its outstanding 1.875% convertible senior notes (the "2023 Notes") due 2023 for an aggregate purchase price of $164.9 million. On November 30, 2021, in connection with the announcement of the Note Offering, the Company provided notice that it would redeem the remaining 2023 Notes that were not repurchased in connection with the Note Offering effective December 31, 2021. Holders of the 2023 Notes were entitled to convert the 2023 Notes into Common Shares prior to such redemption. On December 31, 2021, the Company completed the redemption of $125.2 million aggregate principal amount of 2023 Notes. In addition, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,579,093 Common Shares to holders who elected to convert their 2023 Notes prior to the redemption date. As a result of such transactions, all the 2023 Notes were either repurchased, redeemed at par or converted into Common Shares and no 2023 Notes remain outstanding.

In March 2021, the Company's share repurchase program (the "Share Repurchase Program"), which initially commenced in March 2013, was renewed for a seventh time. Pursuant to the renewed Share Repurchase Program, the Company is authorized to repurchase up to 10,000,000 Common Shares during the period from March 22, 2021, until March 21, 2022, which represents approximately 4.5% of the 222,681,131 issued and outstanding shares of the Company as of March 8, 2021. As of the date of this AIF, the Company has not repurchased any Common Shares under the renewed Share Repurchase Program.

On March 31, 2021, Jean des Rivières was appointed as a Director of the Company.

On April 1, 2021, the Company renewed its senior secured revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility") with the Bank of Nova Scotia and Bank of Montreal by extending the maturity date from May 10, 2021, to November 30, 2022, and reducing the credit limit from $75.0 million to $50.0 million. Interest on the drawn balance accrued at LIBOR plus an applicable range of 2.25% to 3.5% per annum while the undrawn portion was subject to a standby fee with an applicable range of 0.563% to 0.875% per annum, dependent on certain financial parameters of the Company.

In April 2021, the Company was advised that proceedings involving the Ejido Guamuchil in the Superior Court of the Durango State, Mexico were resolved in the Company's favour. Certain properties included in the San Dimas Mine and for which the Company holds legal title were subject to legal proceedings commenced by the Ejido Guamuchil asserting title to the property. In 2015, the Company obtained a federal injunction (known as an amparo) against the Ejido Guamuchil. The title proceedings were then reinstated that year resulting in the Company's subsidiaries gaining standing rights as an affected third party permitted to submit evidence of the Company's legal title. In February 2017, the Company received a favourable decision which was confirmed on appeal. That decision was further appealed by the Ejido Guamuchil and the appeal was dismissed in April 2021 and the Company's full ownership of the land has been confirmed.

On May 6, 2021, the Company's board of directors approved and declared a quarterly common share dividend of $0.0045 per share, payable on or about June 4, 2021, to common shareholders of record at the close of business on May 17, 2021.

On August 16, 2021, the Company's board of directors approved and declared a quarterly common share dividend of $0.006 per share, payable on or about September 16, 2021, to common shareholders of record at the close of business on August 26, 2021.

On August 15, 2021, the Minera La Encantada and the Tenochtitlán Ejidal Commisariat (the "Commisariat") reached an agreement to settle the Tenochtitlán Ejido lawsuit commenced in 2011; however, eight dissenting Ejido members launched a suit against the Agrarian Attorney's Office and the Commisariat to nullify the election of the members of the Commisariat (the "Dissenting Suit"). Judicial approval of the settlement agreement is pending resolution of the Dissenting Suit.

On November 4, 2021, the Company's board of directors approved and declared a quarterly common share dividend of $0.0049 per share, payable on or about November 30, 2021, to common shareholders of record at the close of business on November 17, 2021.

On December 31, 2021, Raymond Polman retired from his position as Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

On January 18, 2022, the Company announced that Andrew Poon, Vice President of Finance of the Company, was appointed as Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

On March 10, 2022, the Company's board of directors approved and declared a quarterly common share dividend of $0.0079 per share, payable on or about April 4, 2022, to common shareholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 2022.

In March 2022, the Share Repurchase Program was renewed for an eighth time. Pursuant to the renewed Share Repurchase Program, the Company is authorized to repurchase up to 10,000,000 Common Shares during the period from March 22, 2022, until March 21, 2023, which represents approximately 3.8% of the 260,181,674 issued and outstanding shares of the Company as of March 9, 2022. As of the date of this AIF, the Company has not repurchased any Common Shares under the renewed Share Repurchase Program.

On March 28, 2022, David Soares was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

Silver is a precious metal that is a very important industrial commodity, with growing uses in several technologies, and desirable for jewellery and investment purposes. Silver has a unique combination of characteristics including: durability, malleability, ductility, conductivity, reflectivity and anti-bacterial properties that make it valuable in numerous industrial applications including solar panels, circuit boards, electrical wiring, semi & superconductors, brazing and soldering, mirror and window coatings, electroplating, chemical catalysts, pharmaceuticals, filtration systems, batteries, televisions, computers, cell phones, household appliances, automobiles and a wide variety of other electronic products.

Silver and gold are global commodities predominantly traded on the London Bullion Market ("LBM"), an over-the-counter market and the COMEX, a futures and options exchange in New York, where most fund activity in relation to silver is focused. The LBM is the global hub of over-the-counter trading in silver and gold and is the metal's main physical market. Here, a bidding process results in a daily reference price known as the fix. Silver and gold are quoted in US dollars per troy ounce. The Company assigns silver and gold from its doré sales primarily to one major metal broker. The Company also has streaming obligations for gold and silver from its Santa Elena and San Dimas mines, respectively, which are settled directly with the streaming companies, not through its banking relationships.

Silver can be supplied as a primary product from mining silver, or as a by-product from the mining of gold or base metals such as lead and zinc. The Company is a primary silver producer with approximately 52% of its revenue in 2021 from the sale of silver.

The Company also maintains an e-commerce website from which it sells a small portion (less than 2%) of its silver production directly to retail buyers (business to consumer) over the internet as high quality 0.999-fine silver rounds, ingots, bars and medallion sets. See "Product Marketing and Sales".

The following properties are material to First Majestic's business: the San Dimas Silver/Gold Mine; the Santa Elena Silver/Gold Mine; the La Encantada Silver Mine; and the Jerritt Canyon Gold Mine. Production estimates and throughputs for operating mines are quoted as metric tpd related to the tpd capacity of the mine and mill. Production estimates and throughput averages for each mine consider an average of two days of maintenance per month. Annual estimates of production are based on an average of 365 calendar days per year for each of the operating mines, and these mines generally operate 330 days per year even though the throughput rates are based on 365 calendar days average.

The following maps indicates the locations of each of the Company's operating mines, care and maintenance mines and other projects in México and the United States.

The internal Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves estimates reported herein represent the most up to date revisions completed by First Majestic. Readers are cautioned against relying upon the Resource and Reserve estimates herein, as these estimates are based on certain assumptions regarding future events and performance such as: commodity prices, operating costs, taxes, metallurgical performance, and commercial terms. Interpretations and Resource and Reserve estimates are based on limited sampling information. The following tables set out the Company's Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources estimated as of December 31, 2021.

In general, the consolidated Mineral Reserves for First Majestic, with an effective date of December 31, 2021, have increased 57% in terms of tonnage, increased 1% in terms of silver metal content, and increased 118% in terms of gold metal content compared to the prior estimate of December 31, 2020. This variation reflects the conversion of Mineral Resources into Mineral Reserves at the Ermitaño mine supported by a pre-feasibility study, the acquisition of the Jerritt Canyon Gold Mine in April 2021, and includes the effect of depletion as normal course of mining at the Company's ongoing operations as well as the impact of recent technical and economic data.

Mineral Reserve estimates for the Material Properties with an Effective Date of December 31, 2021,

(1) Mineral Reserves have been classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, whose definitions are incorporated by reference into NI 43-101.

(2) The Mineral Reserve statement provided in the table above have an effective date of December 31, 2021. The Mineral Reserve estimates were prepared under the supervision of Ramón Mendoza Reyes, PEng, and a Qualified Person ("QP") for the purposes of NI 43-101 who has the appropriate relevant qualifications, and experience in mining and mineral reserves estimation.

(3) The Mineral Reserves were estimated from the Measured and Indicated portions of the Mineral Resource estimate. Inferred Mineral Resources were not considered to be converted into Mineral Reserves.

(4) Silver-equivalent grade (Ag-Eq) is estimated considering metal price assumptions, metallurgical recovery for the corresponding mineral type/mineral process and the metal payable of the selling contract.

Ag-Eq Grade = Ag Grade + Au Grade * (Au Recovery * Au Payable * Au Price) / (Ag Recovery * Ag Payable * Ag Price).

(b) Metal prices considered for Mineral Reserves estimates were $22.50/oz Ag and $1,750/oz Au for all sites. The silver-equivalent factor used for Jerritt Canyon was 77.8 g/t Ag-Eq per 1 g/t Au.

(c) Other key assumptions and parameters include: metallurgical recoveries; metal payable terms; direct mining costs, processing costs, indirect and G&A costs and sustaining costs. These parameters are different for each mine and mining method assumed and are presented in each mine section of the 2021 AIF.

(5) A two-step constraining approach has been implemented to estimate reserves for each mining method in use: A General Cut-Off Grade (GC) was used to delimit new mining areas that will require development of access, infrastructure and all sustaining costs. A second Incremental Cut-Off Grade (IC) was considered to include adjacent mineralized material which recoverable value pays for all associated costs, including but not limited to the variable cost of mining and processing, indirect costs, treatment, administration costs and plant sustaining costs but excludes the access development assumed to be covered by the block above the GC grade.

(6) The cut-off grades, metallurgical recoveries, payable terms and modifying factors used to convert Mineral Reserves from Mineral Resources are different for all mines and are presented in each mine section in the 2021 AIF.

(7) Modifying factors for conversion of resources to reserves include consideration for planned dilution which is based on spacial and geotechnical aspects of the designed stopes and economic zones, additional dilution consideration due to unplanned events, materials handling and other operating aspects, and mining recovery factors. Mineable shapes were used as geometric constraints.

(8) Tonnage is expressed in thousands of tonnes; metal content is expressed in thousands of ounces. Metal prices and costs are expressed in USD.

(9) Numbers have been rounded as required by reporting guidelines. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

(10) The technical reports from which the above-mentioned information is derived are cited under the heading "Technical Reports for Material Properties" in the 2021 AIF.

From December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2021, the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource estimates for the Company's Material Properties have increased 54% in terms of tonnage, decreased 1% in terms of silver metal content and increased 130% in terms of gold metal content as the result of the exploration programs designed to sustain Mineral Resources, the conversion of Inferred Resources to Indicated Resources at Ermitaño following the infill exploration program completed in 2021, and the incorporation of Mineral Resources of the Jerritt Canyon Gold Mine acquired in April 2021.

Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource Estimates for the Material Properties,

Effective Date of December 31, 2021, prepared under the supervision of Ramon Mendoza Reyes, P.Eng.

1. Mineral Resource estimates have been classified in accordance with the 2014 Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, whose definitions are incorporated by reference into National Instrument NI 43-101.

2. The Mineral Resource estimates provided above have an effective date of December 31, 2021. The estimates were prepared by FMS Internal QPs, who have the appropriate relevant qualifications, and experience in geology and resource estimation. The information provided was compiled by David Rowe, CPG, Internal QP for First Majestic, and reviewed by Ramon Mendoza Reyes, P.Eng., Internal QP for First Majestic.

3. Sample data was collected through a cut-off date of December 31, 2021, for the Material Properties. All properties account for relevant technical information and mining depletion through December 31, 2021.

4. Metal prices considered for Mineral Resources estimates were $25.00/oz Ag and $1,800/oz Au.

5. Silver-equivalent grade is estimated considering: metal price assumptions, metallurgical recovery for the corresponding mineral type/mineral process and the metal payable of the corresponding contract of each mine. Estimation details are listed in each mine section of the Annual Information Form (AIF).

6. The cut-off grades and cut-off values used to report Mineral Resources are different for all mines. The cut-off grades, values and economic parameters are listed in the applicable section describing each mine section of the AIF.

7. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource estimates are inclusive of the Mineral Reserve estimates.

8. Tonnage is expressed in thousands of tonnes, metal content is expressed in thousands of ounces. Totals may not add up due to rounding.

9. The technical reports from which the above-mentioned information for the material properties is derived are cited under the heading "Technical Reports for Material Properties" of the AIF.

From December 31, 2020 to December 31, 2021, the Inferred Mineral Resource estimates for the Company's Material Properties have increased by 20% in terms of tonnage, decreased 23% in terms of silver metal content and increased 70% in terms of gold metal content as a result of new drilling, the modelling of additional deposits, and the impact of changing metal prices on the economic parameters considered, and the incorporation of Mineral Resources of the Jerritt Canyon Gold Mine acquired in April 2021.

Effective Date of December 31, 2021, prepared under the supervision of Ramon Mendoza Reyes, P.Eng.

2. The Mineral Resource estimates provided above have an effective date of December 31, 2021, for the Material Properties. The estimates were prepared by FMS Internal QPs, who have the appropriate relevant qualifications, and experience in geology and resource estimation. The information provided was compiled by David Rowe, CPG, Internal QP for First Majestic, and reviewed by Ramon Mendoza Reyes, P.Eng., Internal QP for First Majestic.

3. Sample data was collected through a cut-off date of December 31, 2021, for the material properties. All properties account for relevant technical information and mining depletion through December 31, 2021.

4. Metal prices considered for Mineral Resources estimates were $25.00/oz Ag and $1,800/oz Au.

5. Silver-equivalent grade is estimated considering metal price assumptions, metallurgical recovery for the corresponding mineral type/mineral process and the metal payable of the corresponding contract of each mine. Estimation details are listed in each mine section of the Annual Information Form (AIF).

7. Tonnage is expressed in thousands of tonnes; metal content is expressed in thousands of ounces. Totals may not add up due to rounding.

8. The technical reports from which the above-mentioned information for the material properties is derived are cited under the heading "Technical Reports for Material Properties" of the AIF.

San Martin, La Parrilla, Del Toro and La Guitarra are currently in temporary suspension of production activities and are considered non-material properties. The Mineral Resources estimates shown below for the non-material properties have an effective date of December 31, 2020.

Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource Estimates for the Non-Material Properties,

Effective Date of December 31, 2020, prepared under the supervision of Ramon Mendoza Reyes, P.Eng.

2. The Mineral Resource estimates for the non-material properties were updated December 31, 2020. The estimates were prepared by FMS Internal QPs, who have the appropriate relevant qualifications, and experience in geology and resource estimation. The information provided was compiled by David Rowe, CPG, Internal QP for First Majestic, and reviewed by Ramon Mendoza Reyes, P.Eng., Internal QP for First Majestic.

3. Sample data was collected through a cut-off date of December 31, 2020, for non-material properties.

4. Metal prices considered for Mineral Resources estimates on December 31, 2020 were $22.50/oz Ag, $1,850/oz Au, $0.90/lb Pb and $1.05/lb Zn.

7. Tonnage is expressed in thousands of tonnes, metal content is expressed in thousands of ounces. Totals may not add up due to rounding.

Effective Date of December 31, 2020, prepared under the supervision of Ramon Mendoza Reyes, P.Eng.

3. Sample data was collected through a cut-off date of December 31, 2020, for the non-material properties.

4. Metal prices considered for Mineral Resources estimates on December 31, 2020 were $22.50/oz Ag, $1,850/oz Au, $0.90/lb Pb and $1.05/lb Zn.

7. Tonnage is expressed in thousands of tonnes, metal content is expressed in thousands of ounces. Totals may not add up due to rounding.

Technical reports were prepared for each of the Company's material properties as follows:

1. Technical Report titled "First Majestic Silver Corp., San Dimas Silver/Gold Mine, Durango and Sinaloa States, México, NI 43-101 Technical Report on Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates" with an effective date of December 31, 2020, and prepared by Mr. Ramon Mendoza Reyes, P.Eng., Mr. Joaquin Merino, P.Geo., Ms. Maria Elena Vazquez, P.Geo. and Mr. Persio P. Rosario, P.Eng.;

2. Technical Report titled "First Majestic Silver Corp., Santa Elena Silver/Gold Mine, Sonora, México, NI 43-101 Technical Report on Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates", with an effective date of June 30, 2021, and prepared by Mr. Ramon Mendoza Reyes, P.Eng., Mr. Phillip Spurgeon, P.Geo., Ms. Maria Elena Vazquez, P.Geo. and Mr. Persio P. Rosario, P. Eng.;

3. Technical Report titled "First Majestic Silver Corp., La Encantada Silver Mine, Coahuila, México, NI 43-101 Technical Report on Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates" with an effective date of December 31, 2020, and prepared by Mr. Ramon Mendoza Reyes, P.Eng., Mr. David Rowe, CPG, Ms. Maria Elena Vazquez, P.Geo., Mr. Brian Boutilier, P.Eng., and Mr. Persio P. Rosario, P.Eng.; and

4. Technical Report titled "Technical Report on the Jerritt Canyon Mine, Elko County, Nevada, USA" with an effective date of December 31, 2020, and prepared by Mr. Ryan Rodney, C.P.G., Mr. Gordon L. Fellows, P.E., Ms. Chelsea Hamilton, P.Eng., Mr. Andrew P. Hampton, M.Sc., P.Eng., and Mr. Jeremy Scott Collyard, MMSA QP.

The following table shows the total tonnage mined from each of the Company's producing properties during 2021, including ounces of silver and ounces of gold produced from each property and the tonnage mined from Mineral Reserves at each property. A portion of the production from each mine came from material other than Reserves, as set out below under the heading "Material Mined from Areas Not in Reserves".

The following description of the San Dimas Silver/Gold mine (San Dimas mine) has been summarized from the Technical Report titled "First Majestic Silver Corp., San Dimas Silver/Gold Mine, Durango and Sinaloa States, Mexico NI 43-101 Technical Report on Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimate" with effective date December 31, 2020 (the "2020 San Dimas Technical Report") and prepared in accordance with NI 43‐101. Reference should be made to the full text of the 2020 San Dimas Technical Report which is available for review on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

The San Dimas mine is an actively producing silver and gold mining complex owned and operated by the Company's wholly owned indirect subsidiary, PEM. The San Dimas mine is located near the town of Tayoltita on the borders of the States of Durango and Sinaloa, approximately 125 km northeast of Mazatlán, Sinaloa, and 150 km west of the city of Durango, in Durango State, Mexico. The San Dimas mine is centered on latitude 24°06'38"N and longitude 105°55'36"W.

Access to the San Dimas mine is by air or road from the city of Durango. The Company maintains a de Havilland Twin Otter aircraft and a helicopter, both of which are based at Tayoltita. Travel from either Mazatlán or Durango to Tayoltita requires an approximate half hour flight in the Twin Otter aircraft. Most of the personnel and light supplies for the San Dimas mine arrive on regular Company flights from Durango. Heavy equipment and supplies are brought in by road from Durango. By road the trip requires approximately 6-7 hours. The mine is accessible and operates year‐round.

The San Dimas mine consists of 119 individual concessions covering 71,839 ha. In 2013, the Mexican Federal government introduced a mining royalty, effective January 1, 2014, based on 7.5% of taxable earnings before interest and depreciation. In addition, precious metal mining companies must pay a 0.5% royalty on revenues from gold, silver, and platinum. There is no other royalty to be paid on the San Dimas mining concessions.

First Majestic is party to a purchase (streaming) agreement with Wheaton Precious Metals which entitles Wheaton Precious Metals to receive 25% of the gold equivalent production from the San Dimas mine converted at a fixed exchange ratio of silver to gold at 70 to 1 in exchange for ongoing payments equal to the lesser of $617 (as of December 2021 and subject to a 1% annual inflation adjustment) and the prevailing market price, for each gold equivalent ounce delivered under the agreement. The exchange ratio includes a provision to adjust the gold to silver ratio if the average gold to silver ratio moves above or below 90:1 or 50:1, respectively, for a period of six months.

First Majestic (and its predecessor companies) secured surface rights by either acquisition of private and public land or by entering into temporary occupation agreements with surrounding Ejido communities. The surface right agreements in place with the communities provide for use of surface land for exploration activities and mine-related ventilation infrastructure. Current agreements cover the operation for the Company's current LOM plan.

San Dimas holds the necessary permits to operate, including the Environmental License, water rights concessions, and federal land occupation concessions, among others.

The San Dimas mine area contains a series of epithermal gold silver veins that have been mined intermittently since 1757. Modern mining began in the 1880s and has continued under numerous different owners to the present.

In 1961, Minas de San Luis, a company owned by Mexican interests, acquired 51% of the San Dimas group of properties and assumed operations of the mine. In 1978, the remaining 49% interest in the mine was obtained by Luismin S.A. de C.V (Luismin). In 2002, Wheaton River Minerals Ltd. (Wheaton River) acquired the property from Luismin and in 2005 Wheaton River merged with Goldcorp Inc. (Goldcorp). Under its prior name Mala Noche Inc., Primero Mining Corp. (Primero) acquired the San Dimas mine from subsidiaries of Goldcorp in August 2010. In May 2018, First Majestic acquired 100% interest in the San Dimas mine through acquisition of Primero.

Historical production through December 2021 from the San Dimas district is estimated at more than 756 Moz of silver and more than 11.1 Moz of gold, placing the district third in Mexico for precious metal production after Pachuca and Guanajuato. The majority of this production was prior to First Majestic's acquisition of the property in 2018. The average production rate by First Majestic during 2019-2021 at the San Dimas Mine was 2,034 tpd.

Historical production from 2003 to 2021 for the San Dimas mine is shown in Figure 2.

The San Dimas mining district is in the central part of the Sierra Madre Occidental ("SMO"), near the Sinaloa-Durango state border. The SMO consists of Late Cretaceous to early Miocene igneous rocks including two major volcanic successions, the Lower Volcanic Complex ("LVC") and Upper Volcanic Group ("UVG"), totalling approximately 3,500 m in thickness. The LVC consists of predominantly intermediate volcanic and intrusive rocks formed between 100 Ma and 50 Ma. The UVG volcanism consists of primarily of silicic ignimbrites formed between 35 Ma and 29 Ma and 24 Ma and 20 Ma. The LVC and UVG volcanic rocks are intruded by intermediate rocks and a felsic rocks and basic dikes.

Major north-northwest-trending normal faults with opposite vergence divide the San Dimas district into five fault-bounded blocks that are tilted to the east-northeast or west-northwest. Three deformational events are related to the development of the major faults and structures that host veins and dikes. A late Eocene event produced tension gashes with an east-west to northeast orientation that host the first hydrothermal vein systems. An early Oligocene event produced north-south-trending right-lateral strike-slip that are related to the development of a second set of hydrothermal veins. A late Oligocene-Miocene event produced the tilted fault blocks that affected the entire district and exposed the silver and gold mineralization prior to the deposition of a ∼24 Ma ignimbrite package. Veins within these tilted fault blocks generally trend east-northeast, within a corridor approximately 10 km wide. The veins are often truncated by the north-northwest-trending major faults, separating the original veins into segments. The veins have been followed underground from a few metres in strike-length to more than 1,500 m. A total of 118 silver and gold mineralized quartz veins have been recognized in the San Dimas Concessions Group, which represents 38% of the total property area. All Mineral Resources reported for San Dimas are hosted in the deposits that have been found in the San Dimas Concessions Group.

Three major stages of mineralization have been recognized in the district: an early stage; an ore forming stage; and a late quartz forming stage. The minerals characteristic of the ore-forming stage consists of white, to light grey, medium to coarse grained crystalline quartz with intergrowths of base metal sulphides (sphalerite, chalcopyrite and galena) as well as pyrite, argentite, polybasite, stromeyerite, native silver and electrum. The veins are formed by filling fractures and typical textures observed include crustiform, comb structure, colloform banding and brecciation.

The vein-hosted mineral deposits within the San Dimas district are considered to be examples of silver- and gold-bearing epithermal quartz veins that formed in a low-sulphidation setting. Vein systems can be laterally extensive, but the associated ore shoots have relatively restricted vertical extent. High-grade ores are commonly form within dilational faults zones near flexures and fault splays. Textures typical of low-sulphidation quartz vein deposits include open-space filling, symmetrical and other layering, crustification, comb structure, colloform banding and complex brecciation.

The San Dimas district has been the subject of modern exploration and mine development activities since the early 1970s, and a considerable information database has been developed from both exploration and mining activities. Exploration uses information from surface and underground mapping, sampling, and drilling together with extensive underground mine tunneling to help identify targets. Other exploration activities include prospecting, geochemical surface sampling, geophysical and remote sensing surveys.

Most of the exploration activities carried out in the San Dimas mine area, centered around the Piaxtla River where exposures of silver-gold veins were found. Outside of this area, the Lechuguilla and Ventana Concessions Group areas were explored to some extent during 2008 and 2015-16. The remainder of the concessions have had limited or no exploration as they are covered by thick piles of post-mineral ignimbrites.

The most important exploration strategy at San Dimas has been underground mine tunnelling. Tunnelling consists of advancing mine development to the north at the preferred elevation to intersect quartz veins mapped at surface. This method discovered veins with no surface exposure, such as the Jessica vein, which currently is a major contributor to silver and gold production with approximately 40% of the metal produced. This exploration strategy has been used at San Dimas by all property owners after Luismin, resulting in more than 500 km of underground mine development.

The San Dimas exploration potential remains open in all the mine zones. As the mine was developed to the north, new veins were found. South of the Piaxtla River, the El Cristo area has potential for new quartz vein discoveries. The West Block is currently being explored by tunnelling. Opportunities to intercept the projection of fault-offset quartz veins from the Graben Block are considered good.

Since 1975 the exploration drilling strategy has focused on diamond drilling perpendicular to the preferred vein orientation within the mine zones. Drilling is predominantly done from underground stations, as the rugged topography and the great drilling distance from surface locations to the targets makes surface drilling challenging and expensive. Over 1,158,000 m of core drilling has been completed since 2000, and from 2018 through December 2021, more than 329,000 m of drilling was completed.

Diamond drill core is delivered to the core logging facility where San Dimas geologists select and mark sample intervals according to lithological contacts, mineralization, alteration, and structural features. Sample intervals range from 0.25-1.20 m in length within mineralized structures to 0.5-1.20 m in length when sampling waste rock. Drill core intervals selected for sampling are cut in half using a diamond saw. Softer rocks are split using a hydraulic guillotine splitter. One half of the core is retained in the core box for further inspection and the other half is placed in a sample bag. For smaller diameter delineation drill core, the entire core is sampled for analysis. The sample number is printed with a marker on the core box beside the sampled interval, and a sample tag is inserted into the sample bag. Sample bags are tied with string and placed in rice bags for shipping.

Underground mine production channel samples are used to support mineral resource estimation at San Dimas. Channel sampling for resource estimation is supervised by San Dimas geologists and undertaken using a hammer and chisel. Sample lengths range from 0.20-1.20 m. The samples are taken as a rough channel along a marked line, with an emphasis on representative volume sampling and respecting vein/wall contacts and textural or mineralogical features. The sample is collected on the tarpaulin, broken with a hammer, and quartered and homogenized to obtain a 3 kg sample. The sample is bagged and labelled with sample number and location details. Sketches and photographs are recorded of the face sampled, showing the samples' physical location from surveying and the measured width of each sample. Since 2011, all channel samples are dispatched to the San Dimas Laboratory.

Specific gravity ("SG") measurements were systematically taken on drill core since October 2012. Since 2016, SG measurements were collected on 10 cm or longer whole core vein samples using the unsealed water immersion method.

Since 2004, four different laboratories have been used for sample preparation and analysis of drill core and channel samples. These include:

At San Dimas Laboratory samples are currently dried at 110°C, crushed to 80% passing 2 mm, split into 250 g subsamples and pulverized to 80% passing 75 μm. At SGS samples were dried at 105°C, crushed 75% passing 2 mm, and split into a 250 g subsample and pulverized to 85% passing 75 μm. At the Central Laboratory samples are dried at 100°C, crushed to 85% passing 2 mm, split into a 250 g subsample, and pulverized to 85% passing 75 μm.

Before 2018 samples submitted to San Dimas Laboratory were analyzed for gold using a 10 g fire assay (FA) with a gravimetric finish. Since 2018, samples submitted to the San Dimas Laboratory are analyzed for gold using a 30 g fire assay atomic absorption spectroscopy method (FA-AAS) and by gravimetric finish if the doré bead is greater than 12 mg. Silver is determined using 30 g FA gravimetric finish (FAGR). Between 2013 and 2018, and from May 2021 to December 2021, samples sent to SGS Durango were analyzed for gold by a 30 g FA-AAS method. Samples returning >10 g/t Au were reanalyzed by a 30 g FAGR method. Silver was analyzed by a 2 g, three-acid digestion AAS method. Silver values >300 g/t were analyzed by a 30 g FAGR method. A multi-element suite was analyzed by a 0.25 g, aqua regia digestion inductively coupled plasma (ICP) optical emission spectroscopy (OES) method.

Samples submitted to the Central Laboratory are analyzed for gold by a two-acid digestion AAS method. Samples with gold values >10 g/t are reanalyzed by a 30 g, FAGR method. Silver values are determined using a 2 g, three-acid digestion AAS method. Samples with silver values >200 g/t are analyzed by a 30 g FAGR method. All exploration samples are analysed by a two-acid multi-element ICP OES method.

There is limited information as to whether a formal quality assurance and quality control (QAQC) program was in place prior to 2013. From 2013 to 2018, the QAQC program for the San Dimas Laboratory samples included insertion of a standard reference material (SRM) and a blank in every batch of 20 samples. From 2013 to 2018, the QAQC program for samples submitted to SGS included insertion of a SRM and a blank in every batch of 20 samples. In 2013, 5% of the coarse reject and pulp duplicates from core samples were randomly selected for analysis at SGS and 5% of pulp checks from core samples were analyzed at ALS. In 2019, PEM revised the QAQC program to include insertion of three CRM samples and three blanks in every batch of 50 channel samples analyzed at the San Dimas Laboratory and one CRM and two blanks in every batch of 26 drill core and channel check samples submitted to the Central Laboratory. In 2021, the QAQC program included 6% of field duplicates, coarse duplicates and pulp duplicates, 6% of CRMs and 4% of coarse and pulp blanks inserted in samples submitted to Central Laboratory and SGS.

Data verification conducted to support the 2021 Mineral Resource Estimate included a review of drill hole and channel sample data collected for several veins (the verification dataset) and included data transcription error checks for assay results, drill hole collar and channel location checks, downhole survey deviation checks, visual inspection of core, and an assessment of accuracy and contamination of primary and check channel samples for silver and gold.

No significant transcription errors or grade accuracy and contamination issues were observed.

Numerous site visits were also completed by the Qualified Persons ("QPs") responsible for this technical report. Site visits focused specifically on data verification reviewed current drill core and channel logging and sampling procedures and inspected drill core, core photos, core logs, and QAQC reports. Spot checks were completed by comparing lithology records in the database with archived core. No significant issues were observed.

The San Dimas mine is operating, and the initial test data supporting plant design are superseded by decades of plant performance data. Metallurgical testing, along with mineralogical investigation, is periodically performed. Even when the results are within the expected processing performance, the plant is continually running tests to optimize metal recoveries and operating costs. Composite samples are analyzed monthly to determine the metallurgic behaviour of the mineralized material fed into the processing plant. This metallurgical testing is carried out by the Central Laboratory.

Due to the purity of the San Dimas doré, which exceeds 97% silver and gold, no penalties are applied by the refineries for the presence of other heavy metals.

All Mineral Resource estimates at San Dimas were completed using block modeling techniques. The Mineral Resource estimates based on block models are constrained by the three-dimensional geological interpretation and modelled domains for vein-hosted mineral deposits. The modelled domains were constructed using information collected by mine geology staff and interpreted by geologists. Information used included underground geological mapping, drill hole logs and drill hole assays, production channel sampling and assays. The interpreted boundaries of the domain models strictly adhered to the contacts of quartz veins with the surrounding country rock to produce reasonable representations of the deposit locations and volumes.

The selected composite sample length varied by domain with the most common composite sample length being 1.0 m. The assay sample intervals were composited within the limits of the domain boundaries and then tagged with the appropriate domain code. Drill hole and channel composite samples were evaluated for high-grade outliers and those outliers were capped to values considered appropriate for each domain.

Mineral Resources were estimated into sub-block models rotated parallel to the resource domain trend. Parent block grades were estimated using inverse distance weighting to the second power (ID²) interpolation. The block estimates were made with multiple passes to limit the influence the channel production samples at longer ranges: Pass 1 was a restrictive short-range pass that used channel and drill hole composite samples, and subsequent less restrictive passes used drill hole samples only. An average bulk density value of 2.6 t/m³ was used in estimation for all resource domains.

The Mineral Resource estimates were classified into Measured, Indicated, or Inferred categories and considered confidence in the geological interpretation and models, confidence in the continuity of metal grades, and the sample support for the estimation and reliability of the sample data. Blocks were flagged to be considered for the Measured category if the nominal drill hole spacing from the nearest 3 drill holes was <15 m or the blocks were within 15 m of a mined development with production channel samples and geological control. Blocks were flagged to be considered for the Indicated category if the nominal drill hole spacing was <30 m or the blocks were within 30 m of a mined development with production channel samples and geological control. Blocks were flagged to be considered for the Inferred category if the nominal drill hole spacing was <45 m.

The Mineral Resource estimates for San Dimas are summarized in Table 7 and Table 8 using a silver equivalent (Ag-Eq) cut-off grade of 165 g/t. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves and have an effective date of December 31, 2021. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

Table 7: San Dimas Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate (effective date December 31, 2021)

Table 8: San Dimas Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (effective date December 31, 2021)

1. Mineral Resources have been classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, whose definitions are incorporated by reference into NI 43-101.

2. The Mineral Resources information provided above is based on internal estimates prepared as of December 31, 2021. The information provided was reviewed and prepared By Mizrain Sumoza under the supervision of Joaquin Merino, PGeo, QP Geology for FMS, who has the appropriate relevant qualifications, and experience in geology and resource estimation.

3. Silver-equivalent grade is estimated considering: metal price assumptions, metallurgical recovery and the metal payable terms.

Ag-Eq = Ag Grade + (Au Grade x Au Recovery x Au Payable x Au Price) / (Ag Recovery x Ag Payable x Ag Price).

4. Metal prices considered for Mineral Resources estimates were $25.00/oz Ag and $1,800/oz Au.

7. Cut-off grade considered to constraint resources assuming an underground operation was 165 g/t Ag-Eq and was based on actual and budgeted operating and sustaining costs.

8. Tonnage is expressed in thousands of tonnes; metal content is expressed in thousands of ounces.

10. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves.

Factors that may materially impact the Mineral Resource estimates include: Mineral Resources reported using polygonal assumptions may have the confidence classification reassigned when the polygons are converted into block models that use best practice estimation methods; changes to the assumptions used to generate the silver-equivalent grade cut-off grade including metal price and exchange rates; changes to interpretations of mineralization geometry and continuity; changes to geotechnical, mining, and metallurgical recovery assumptions; assumptions as to the continued ability to access the site, retain mineral and surface rights titles, maintain environment and other regulatory permits, and maintain the social license to operate.

The Mineral Reserves estimation process consists of converting Mineral Resources into Mineral Reserves by identifying material that exceeds the mining cut-off grades while conforming to specified geometrical constraints determined by the applicable mining method and applying modifying factors such as mining dilution and mining recovery factors. If the Mineral Resources comply with the previous constraints, Measured Resources could be converted to Proven Reserves and Indicated Resources could be converted to Probable Reserves, in some instances Measured Resources could be converted to Probable Reserves if any or more of the modifying factors reduces the confidence of the estimates.

Table 9: San Dimas Mineral Reserves Estimates (Effective Date December 31, 2021)

(2) The Mineral Reserve statement provided in the table above have an effective date of December 31, 2021, and are based on resource models prepared with drill-hole and production channel sample data collected with a cut-off date of December 31, 2021.

(3) The Mineral Reserves were estimated from the Measured and Indicated portions of the Mineral Resource estimate. Inferred Mineral Resources were not considered to be converted into Mineral Reserves.

(4) The Mineral Reserve estimates account for mining depletion through December 31, 2021.

The information provided was prepared and reviewed under the supervision of Ramón Mendoza Reyes, P.Eng., and a Qualified Person ("QP") for the purposes of NI 43-101.

(5) Silver-equivalent grade (Ag-Eq) is estimated considering metal price assumptions, metallurgical recovery for the corresponding mineral type/mineral process and the metal payable of the selling contract.

Ag-Eq Grade = Ag Grade + Au Grade * (Au Recovery * Au Payable * Au Price) / (Ag Recovery * Ag Payable * Ag Price).

(b) Metal prices considered for Mineral Reserves estimates were $22.50/oz Ag and $1,750/oz Au.

(c) Other key assumptions and parameters include: Metallurgical recoveries of 94.7% for silver, 96.2% for gold; metal payable of 99.95% for silver and for gold; direct mining costs of $43.77/t for Longhole and $37.85/t for Cut and Fill, processing costs of $39.61/t mill feed, indirect and G&A costs of $51.87/t and sustaining costs of $45.52/t for Longhole and Cut and Fill.

(6) A two-step constraining approach has been implemented to estimate reserves for each mining method in use: A General Cut-Off Grade (GC) was used to delimit new mining areas that will require development of access, infrastructure and all sustaining costs. A second Incremental Cut-Off Grade (IC) was considered to include adjacent mineralized material which recoverable value pays for all associated costs, including but not limited to the variable cost of mining and processing, indirect costs, treatment, administration costs and plant sustaining costs but excludes the access development assumed to be covered by the block above the GC grade.

(7) Modifying factors for conversion of resources to reserves include consideration for planned dilution due to geometric aspects of the designed stopes and economic zones, and additional dilution consideration due to unplanned events, materials handling and other operating aspects. Mineable shapes were used as geometric constraints.

(8) Tonnage is expressed in thousands of tonnes; metal content is expressed in thousands of ounces. Metal prices and costs expressed in USD.

(9) Numbers have been rounded as required by reporting guidelines. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

The Company is not aware of any known mining, metallurgical, environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, political, or other relevant factors that could materially affect the mineral reserve estimates, other than discussed herein.

The San Dimas mine includes five underground gold and silver mining areas: West Block (San Antonio mine), Sinaloa Graben Block (Graben Block), Central Block, Tayoltita Block, and the Arana Hanging-wall Block (Santa Rita mine). Mining activities are conducted by both First Majestic and contractor personnel. Two mining methods are currently being used at San Dimas:

Cut-and-fill is carried out by either jumbo or jackleg drills, whereas longhole is carried out with pneumatic and electro-hydraulic drills. Primary access is provided by adits and internal ramps.

Ground conditions throughout most of the San Dimas underground workings are considered good. Bolting is used systematically in the main haulage ramps, drifts, and underground infrastructure. For those sectors that present unfavorable rock quality, shotcrete, mesh and/or steel arches are used.

Groundwater inflow has not been a significant concern in the San Dimas mine area.

The processing plant at San Dimas has been successfully operating for several years and continuously achieves high levels of recoveries for silver and gold. The process is based on cyanide tank leaching and Merrill-Crowe of ground plant-feed to produce silver/gold doré bars. The installed plant capacity is for 3,000 tonnes per day. However, the current throughput levels are around 2,300 tonnes per day. The average feed contains head grades in the order of 300 g/t Ag and 3.2 g/t Au.

The San Dimas processing plant is built as a single train with the crushing area split from the remaining areas and connected through a belt conveyor to transfer the crushed product from the screening underflow to the fine-ore bins. The remaining areas are the following: grinding circuits, leach tanks, CCD tanks, Merrill-Crowe, smelting and tailings filtration and stacking.

The infrastructure in San Dimas is fully developed to support current mining and mineral processing activities, with part of its facilities located in the town of Tayoltita.

Most of the personnel and light supplies for the San Dimas mine arrive on First Majestic's regular flights from Mazatlán and Durango. Heavy equipment and main supplies are brought by road from Durango and Mazatlán.

The main infrastructure of San Dimas consists of access roads, the San Dimas mines, crushing and processing facilities known as the Tayoltita mill, the Tayoltita/Cupias tailings facilities, an assays laboratory, offices and staff camp, the Las Truchas hydro-electric generation facilities, a diesel-powered emergency generation plant, a local airport and infrastructure supporting the inhabitants of the Tayoltita townsite including a local clinic, schools and sport facilities.

Electrical power is provided by a combination of First Majestic's own hydroelectric generation system (Las Truchas) and the Federal Power Commission supply system ("CFE"). First Majestic operates the hydroelectric generation plant, which is interconnected with the CFE power grid, and a series of back-up diesel generators for emergencies. During 2021, Las Truchas contributed approximately 48% of the site's energy requirements.

The source of water for industrial use comes partly from mine dewatering stations but mainly from the recycled filtered-tailings water after it has been treated, the balance is sourced from the Santa Rita well which fills from the Piaxtla River. About 80% of the water required for processing activities is being treated and recycled.

Drinking water is supplied by First Majestic to the town of Tayoltita from an underground thermal spring located at the Santa Rita mine.

San Dimas is an operating mine, as such it holds all major environmental permits and licenses required by the Mexican authorities to carry out mineral extracting activities in the mining complex.

The main environmental permit is the environmental license "Licencia Ambiental Unica" under which the mine operates its industrial facilities in accordance with the Mexican environmental protection laws administered by the Mexican environmental authorities, the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources ("SEMARNAT") as the agency in charge of environment and natural resources. The most recent update to the main environmental permit was approved in July 2019.

The San Dimas mine has implemented the First Majestic Environmental Management System ("EMS"), which supports the implementation of environmental policy and is applied to standardize tasks and strengthen a culture focused on minimizing environmental impacts. The EMS is based on the requirements of the international standard ISO 14001:2015 and the requirements to obtain the Certificate of Clean Industry, issued by SEMARNAT, through the Federal Attorney for Environmental Protection in Mexico ("PROFEPA"). The EMS includes an annual compliance program to review all environmental obligations.

In May 2018, the San Dimas mine received the Clean Industry Certification for improvements to its environmental management practices at the mine.

In February 2022, for the eleventh consecutive year, the San Dimas mine was awarded the Socially Responsible Company ("ESR") designation by the Mexican Center for Philanthropy ("CEMEFI").

Environmental liabilities for the operation are typical of those that would be expected to be associated with an operating underground precious metals mine, including the future closure and reclamation of mine portals and ventilation infrastructure, access roads, processing facilities, power lines, filtered tailings deposits and all surface infrastructure that supports the operations. Other potential liabilities include industrial water management, petroleum spills and carbon emissions from mobile equipment. The reclamation work carried out at San Dimas in 2021 includes the conforming of terraces in the filtered tailings deposits in accordance with the design.

The LOM plan includes estimates for sustaining capital expenditures for the planned mining and processing activities.

Sustaining capital expenditures will mostly be allocated for on-going development in waste, infill drilling, mine equipment rebuilding, equipment overhauls or replacements, plant maintenance and on-going refurbishing, and for tailings management facilities expansion as needed. Table 10 presents the summary of the sustaining and expansionary capital expenditures.

Operating costs for San Dimas have been estimated for the underground mining, processing costs, operation's indirect, and general and administrative costs. First Majestic currently estimates operating costs at an average of $129.70 per tonne of ore processed based on current and projected costs.

This amount of drilling is expected to continue on an annual basis while production continues but amounts required are reviewed annually. In addition, an annual prospect generation program consisting of prospecting, soil and rock geochemical surveys, mapping, or geophysical surveys is conducted.

In 2021, the Company continued operating the Jessica vein, the Victoria vein, the Roberta/Robertita veins among other minor veins. During 2021, 822,791 tonnes of mineralized material were processed with an average grade of 305 g/t Ag and 3.19 g/t Au.

Development continues in the San Dimas mine preparing extraction levels in the upper part of the Jessica vein and developing the Perez vein and new extraction areas in the West and the Sinaloa/Graben blocks.

The following information on the Santa Elena Silver/Gold Mine ("Santa Elena mine") is based on a Technical Report prepared in accordance with NI 43‐101 and titled Technical Report prepared in accordance with NI 43‐101 and titled "First Majestic Silver Corp. Santa Elena Silver/Gold Mine Sonora, Mexico NI 43-101 Technical Report on Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates" with effective date of June 30, 2021 (the "Santa Elena Technical Report") prepared in accordance with NI 43‐101. Reference should be made to the full text of the Santa Elena Technical Report which is available for review on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

The Santa Elena mine is an actively producing underground gold and silver mining complex owned and operated by the Company's wholly owned indirect subsidiary, Nusantara de México, S.A. de C.V. ("Nusantara"). The property is in Sonora, México, approximately 150 kilometres northeast of the state capital city of Hermosillo and seven kilometres east of the community of Banámichi. The property is centered on latitude 30°01.3'N and longitude 110°09.5'W.

The Santa Elena mine can be easily accessed year-round by paved highways 90 km east from Hermosillo to Ures, then 50 km north along a paved secondary road to the community of Banámichi, then by a well-maintained gravel road for seven kilometres to the mine site. The Ermitaño mine can be accessed by a 5 kilometres gravel road from the Santa Elena mine.

In 2015, First Majestic completed the acquisition of SilverCrest Mines Inc., the then-owner of Nusantara and the Santa Elena mine. In 2017, First Majestic expanded the Santa Elena property by purchasing a royalty-free 100% interest in the El Gachi property from Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. First Majestic expanded the Santa Elena property again in 2018 by completing the acquisition of a 100% interest in the Ermitaño and Cumobabi properties from Evrim Resource Corp (Evrim). Upon completion of the exercise, Evrim retained a 2% net smelter return (NSR) royalty from the sale of mineral products extracted from the Ermitaño property and retained a 1.5% NSR from the sale of mineral products extracted from the Cumobabi property. In addition, there is an underlying NSR royalty where Mining Royalties Mexico, S.A de C.V. retains a 2% NSR from the sale of mineral products extracted from the Ermitaño and Cumobabi properties. In December 2020, First Majestic completed all option payments and work commitments, and acquired 100% interests in the Los Hernandez property from Pan American Silver Corp. Upon completion of the exercise, Pan American Silver Corp retained a 2.5% NSR from the sale of mineral products derived from the Los Hernandez property. The Santa Elena mine complex currently consists of 32 individual concessions covering 102,172 hectares and four concessions applications in process which cover 72 hectares, for a total of 102,244 hectares.

First Majestic is party to a purchase (streaming) agreement with Sandstorm Gold Ltd. ("Sandstorm"). Sandstorm invested $12 million in May 2009 and an additional $10.0 million in March 2014 which entitles Sandstorm to receive 20% of the gold production from the Santa Elena mine in exchange for ongoing payments equal to the lesser of $467/oz Au (as of December 2021 and subject to a 1% annual inflation adjustment) and the prevailing market price, for each gold ounce delivered under the agreement.

Surface rights in the area of the mining concessions are held both privately and through group ownership either as communal or Ejido lands. First Majestic has agreements in place regarding surface rights with Bienes Comunales de Banámichi, Mr. Francisco Maldonado, Dabafa S.P.R. de R.L., Ejido Banámichi, and the Community of Banámichi. As of December 2021, all obligations were met for these agreements.

Santa Elena holds the necessary permits to operate, such as the Environmental License, water rights concessions, and federal land occupation concessions.

London-based Consolidated Goldfields of Mexico Limited owned and operated the Santa Elena mine in the late 19^th century and mined from surface and underground until around 1910. There is no indication of any further significant mining or exploration at Santa Elena until Industrias Peñoles S.A de C.V. drilled two or three holes on the property in the 1960s. During the early 1980s, Tungsteno de Baviacora ("Tungsteno") owned the property and mined 45,000 tones grading 3.5 g/t Au and 60 g/t Ag from an open cut. Tungsteno periodically surface mined high silica/low fluorine material from Santa Elena.

The property remained under control of Tungsteno until 2009, when SilverCrest Mines Inc. ("SilverCrest") acquired 100% of the Santa Elena property. SilverCrest commenced production from the Santa Elena open pit in October 2010 and by year end 2014 had produced 3.7 Mt at an average grade of 53 g/t Ag and 1.47 g/t Au and in 2015 was producing gold and silver by processing 3,000 tpd of mineralized material from open pit, and underground mining, and reprocessing previously heap-leached material.

First Majestic acquired the Santa Elena property in October 2015 and by year end 2021 has produced 3.7 Mt at 121 g/t Ag and 2.22 g/t Au from underground, including 104 kt of ore from Ermitaño with 54 g/t Ag and 4.83 g/t Au, and has reprocessed 2.5 Mt at 40 g/t Ag and 0.68 g/t Au from the leach pad. The 2010 to 2021 production history is summarized in Table 12.

The Santa Elena deposits are hosted in rocks of the Sierra Madre Occidental ("SMO"), an igneous province that extends from the USA-Mexican border south to Guadalajara, Mexico. The SMO geological province consists of Late Cretaceous to early Miocene volcanic and sedimentary rocks that formed during two main periods of continental magmatic activity. The first period, concurrent with the Laramide orogeny, produced an intermediate intrusive suite and its volcanic counterpart. These rocks, named the Lower Volcanic Complex ("LVC"), include the Late Cretaceous to Paleocene volcanic succession of the Tarahumara Formation and are intruded by the Sonora batholiths. In the late Eocene, volcanism became dominated by rhyolitic ignimbrites. Extensional basins and associated continental sedimentary deposits formed between 27 Ma and 15 Ma in a north-northwest-trending belt along the western half of the SMO.

Many significant porphyry deposits of the SMO occur in the LVC rocks. Northwest-trending fault zones associated with early Eocene east-west directed extension, appear to control epithermal mineralization in the Sonora region. The Santa Elena Main Vein and the Ermitaño Vein have orientations similar to this extensional trend.

The Santa Elena and the Ermitaño deposits are the most significant zones of gold and silver mineralization currently known within the Santa Elena property.

Drilling at the Santa Elena mine has delineated three primary structures occupied by veins. The Main Vein strikes east, dips approximately 55-45° south and is delineated 1,950 m along strike and 750 m down dip. The Alejandra and America Veins are splay of the Main Vein and strike east to east-southeast and dip steeply to the south. Andesite and granodiorite dykes occur adjacent and sub-parallel to the Main Vein.

Drilling at the Ermitaño mine has delineated one primary vein, one secondary vein and several sub-parallel tertiary veins. The Ermitaño Vein strikes east, dips 60° to 80° north, and is delineated 1,800 m along strike and 550 m down dip. The vein is best developed where the structure cuts the older, brittle volcanic rocks.

The mineral deposits of Santa Elena are typical of low sulphidation gold and silver epithermal vein-hosted deposits. Silver and gold mineralization is hosted in quartz veins and stockworks displaying typical epithermal textures, including banded, crustiform and vuggy quartz, bladed calcite (pseudomorph to quartz) and hydrothermal breccia. Sulphide abundance is generally low within the veins and are dominantly pyrite and pyrrhotite with minor galena, sphalerite, and chalcopyrite. Gold occurs typically as native gold, electrum, and silver occurs as electrum, minor acanthite, and argentite.

There have been several surface and airborne exploration surveys and studies completed within the Santa Elena mineral concessions since 2006, including prospecting, mapping, rock and soil geochemical sampling, petrographic and spectrographic studies, magnetic, electromagnetic, and induced polarization surveys. Most of this work has focused on the Santa Elena and Ermitaño mine areas. The regional satellite and airborne surveys have been useful for developing a conceptual geological framework and local mapping and geochemical soil and rock sampling have been useful for identifying prospective drill targets.

Drilling remains the best and most widely used exploration tool within the Santa Elena property.

Between 2006 and year-end 2021, approximately 200,000 m have been drilled at the Santa Elena mine. Drilling in 2021 has shown that mineralization in the Alejandra and America Veins remains open at depth.

Between 2016 and year-end 2021, more than 99,000m were drilled at the Ermitaño mine. Drilling in 2021 showed that gold and silver mineralization in the Ermitaño Vein remains open to the east.

Between 2011 and year-end 2021, approximately 44,255 m of drilling were completed in 12 regional target areas.

The Santa Elena and Ermitaño Mineral Resource estimates are based on logging and sampling of NQ and HQ diameter core and underground channel samples. The entire length of drill core is photographed and logged for lithology, mineralization, structure, and alteration. Core recovery, rock quality designation (RQD) and specific gravity measurements are also collected. Sampling intervals respect lithology and mineralization boundaries. The core is sawn in half for sampling. Channels are taken within a 20 cm wide swath along the line using a hammer and hand chisel and are collected on a tarpaulin and then bagged.

Sample quality control is monitored using CRMs, blanks, and quarter-core field duplicates, coarse reject duplicates, and pulp duplicates. Coarse reject and pulp samples are prepared and inserted by the primary laboratory during sample preparation. Pulp duplicates are also periodically submitted to a secondary laboratory to assess between-laboratory bias.

Before 2016, samples were dispatched to ALS in Hermosillo or Chihuahua, Mexico and Bureau Veritas in Hermosillo, Mexico. From 2016 to 2021, samples from Ermitaño surface drill holes were dispatched to SGS in Durango or Hermosillo, Mexico. From 2016 to 2021, samples from the Santa Elena mine underground drill holes were dispatched to First Majestic's Central Laboratory in Jose La Parrilla, Durango, Mexico and SGS in Durango or Hermosillo, Mexico. Underground channel samples and underground drill hole samples from Ermitaño are sent to the Santa Elena Laboratory. ALS and SGS laboratories are independent of First Majestic. ALS received ISO 9001 certification in 2005 and received accreditation of ISO/IEC 17025 from Standards Council of Canada in 2005 and 2020. The SGS laboratories conform to the ISO/IEC 17025 standard and most regional facilities have been ISO 9001 certified since 2008. First Majestic's Central Laboratory is not independent of First Majestic. The Central Laboratory received ISO 9001 accreditation in mid-2015 and 2017, and the Santa Elena laboratory received ISO 9001:2015 accreditation in September 2021.

At SGS samples are dried crushed and pulverized and then analyzed for 34 elements using aqua regia digestion with an inductively-coupled plasma ("ICP") atomic emission spectroscopy finish. Samples are also analyzed for silver by three-acid digestion with an atomic absorption ("AA") spectroscopy finish. Samples returning greater than 300 g/t Ag from are reanalyzed for silver by 30 g fire assay with a gravimetric method. Gold is analyzed by a 30 g fire assay with an AA finish and samples returning >10 g/t Au are reanalyzed for gold by a 30 g fire assay with a gravimetric finish.

At the First Majestic Central Laboratory samples are dried crushed and pulverized and then analyzed for 34 elements by two-acid digestion with an ICP finish. All samples are also analyzed for silver by three-acid digestion with AA finish. Samples returning greater than 300 g/t Ag are reanalyzed for silver by a 20 g fire assay with a gravimetric finish. Gold is analyzed by two-acid digestion with an AAS finish. Samples returning >10 g/t Au are reanalyzed for gold by a 20 g fire assay with a gravimetric finish.

At the Santa Elena Laboratory samples are dried crushed and pulverized and then analyzed for silver by a 30 g fire assay gravimetric finish. Gold is analyzed by a 30 g fire assay AA finish. Samples with gold values >10 g/t Au are analyzed by a 30 g fire assay gravimetric method. The assay laboratory in Santa Elena mine has been certified under the ISO 9001:2015 standard, enabling a quality management framework that facilitates consistent quality results and continuous improvement to achieve the best industry practices.

Data verification included data entry error checks, visual inspections of important data, and a review of QAQC assay results for data collected between 2012 and December 2021 from the Ermitaño, Alejandra, America, Santa Elena Main, and Tortugas veins (the verification dataset). Several site visits were also completed as part of the data verification process at which time drilling, logging, and sampling procedures were observed and cross sections as, core photos, core logs, and QAQC reports were reviewed. No significant transcription errors or grade accuracy and contamination issues were observed.

Santa Elena is an operating mine and the metallurgical test-work data supporting the initial plant design has been proven and reinforced by plant operating results through the years of operation, combined with more recent metallurgical studies.

Metallurgical testing along with mineralogical investigation is periodically performed, and the plant is continually running tests to optimize metal recoveries and operating costs. Composite samples are analyzed monthly to determine the metallurgic behaviour of the mineralized material fed into the processing plant. The metallurgical testing is carried out by the Central Laboratory.

Typical metal recoveries for the Santa Elena mineralized material ranged from 91% to 94% for silver and 94% to 97% for gold from the combination of run-of-mine (ROM) production from the underground mine and the leach pad material.

To determine the metallurgical behavior of the Ermitaño mineralized material that will be fed to the Santa Elena processing plant, a preliminary testwork program was carried out at the Central Laboratory, followed by a comprehensive sampling and testwork program conducted at SGS Mineral Services, Lakefield, ON, Canada in 2020 and 2021. Based on this testwork, metal recoveries for the Ermitaño deposit for Q1 to Q3 2022 are projected at 92.6% for gold and 66.0% for silver. In Q4 2022, a new Tailings Press Filter and additional equipment will be added to the processing plant improving expected gold recovery to 94.5%.

Due to the high purity of the Santa Elena doré (>98% silver and gold), no penalties are applied by the refineries for the presence of heavy metals. This purity is expected to be maintained after processing the Ermitaño ore.

The block model Mineral Resource estimates for the Santa Elena and Ermitaño deposits are based on the current database of exploration drill holes and production channel samples, the underground level geological mapping, the geological interpretation and model, as well as surface topography and underground mining excavation wireframes. Geostatistical analysis, analysis of semi-variograms, block model resource estimation, and validation of the model blocks were completed.

The drill hole and channel composite samples were evaluated for high-grade outliers and those outliers were capped to values considered appropriate for estimation. Capping of composite sample values was limited to a select few extreme values. Outlier restriction was also used to restrict the influence of high-grade samples.

The dominant gold and silver mineralization trends were identified based on the 3D numeric models for the metal in each domain. To establish the metal grade continuity within the domains, model variograms for composite values were developed along the trends identified, and the nugget values were established from downhole variograms.

Bulk density was derived from SG measurements. Bulk density for the resource domains was either estimated into the block models from the SG data or the mean SG value was assigned.

Block grades were estimated by either inverse distance squared (ID2) or ordinary kriging (OK). The method chosen in each case considered the characteristics of the domain, data spacing, variogram quality, and which method produced the best representation of grade continuity.

All channel samples that were used during construction of the geological models were reviewed. Only those channels that completely cross the mineralized deposit were used during grade estimation.

The grade estimation was completed in two successive passes if channel samples were used. The first pass used all composites, including channel samples, and only estimated blocks within a restricted short distance from the channel samples. The second pass applied less restrictive criteria using drill hole composites only. If only drill hole composites were used, the estimation was often completed with a single pass.

The Mineral Resources were classified into Measured, Indicated, or Inferred categories based on the confidence in the geological interpretation and models, the confidence in the continuity of metal grades, the sample support for the estimation and reliability of the sample data, and on the presence of underground mining development providing detailed mapping and production channel sample support.

The Mineral Resource estimates for Santa Elena and Ermitaño are summarized in Table 13 and Table 14 using the Ag-Eq cut-off grades or NSR cut-off value appropriate for the mining method assigned to each domain. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves and have an effective date of December 31, 2021. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The Qualified Person for the estimate is Mr. Phillip Spurgeon, P.Geo., a First Majestic employee.

Table 13: Santa Elena Mineral Resource Estimates, Measured and Indicated Category

Table 14: Santa Elena Mineral Resource Estimates, Inferred Category, Effective Date December 31, 2021)

1. Mineral Resource estimates are classified in accordance with the 2014 CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, whose definitions are incorporated by reference into NI 43-101.

2. The Mineral Resource estimates are based on internal estimates prepared as of December 31, 2021. The information provided was reviewed and prepared by Phillip Spurgeon, P.Geo., a First Majestic employee.

3. Silver-equivalent grade is estimated considering metal price assumptions, metallurgical recovery, and the metal payable terms.

Ag-Eq = Ag Grade + (Au Grade x Au Recovery x Au Payable x Au Price) / (Ag Recovery x Ag Payable x Ag Price).

4. Metal prices used in the Mineral Resources estimates were $25.00/oz Ag and $1,800/oz Au.

5. Metallurgical recovery was 92% for silver and 95% for gold for Santa Elena and the heap leach pad. For Ermitaño, the metallurgical recovery used was 66% for silver and 95% for gold.

7. The cut-off grade used to constrain the Mineral Resource estimate was 90 g/t Ag-Eq for Santa Elena and 65 g/t Ag-Eq for the heap leach pad. The cut-off grades used were based on actual and budgeted operating and sustaining costs. The NSR cut-off value used to constrain Mineral Resources for the Ermitaño zone domains was $90.79.

8. Tonnage is expressed in thousands of tonnes; metal content is expressed in thousands of ounces.

10. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

Risk factors that could materially impact the Mineral Resource estimates include: metal price and exchange rate assumptions; changes to the assumptions used to generate the silver-equivalent grade cut-off grade; changes in the interpretations of mineralization geometry and continuity of mineralized zones; changes to geological and mineralization shape and geological and grade continuity assumptions; changes to geotechnical, mining, and metallurgical recovery assumptions; changes to the assumptions related to the continued ability to access the site, retain mineral and surface rights titles, maintain environment and other regulatory permits, and maintain the social license to operate. The production channel sampling method has some risk of non-representative sampling that could result in poor precision and accuracy.

The Mineral Reserves estimation process consists of converting Mineral Resources into Mineral Reserves by identifying material that exceeds the mining cut-off grades while conforming to specified geometrical constraints determined by the applicable mining method and applying modifying factors such as mining dilution and mining recovery factors. If the Mineral Resources comply with the previous constraints, Measured Resources could be converted to Proven Reserves and Indicated Resources could be converted to Probable Reserves, and, in some instances, Measured Resources could be converted to Probable Reserves if any or more of the modifying factors reduces the confidence of the estimates.

Table 15: Santa Elena Mineral Reserves Estimates (Effective Date December 31, 2021)

(1) Mineral Reserves have been classified in accordance with the 2014 Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, whose definitions are incorporated by reference into NI 43-101.

(2) The Mineral Reserves statement provided in the table above is based on internal estimates prepared as of December 31, 2021. The information provided was prepared and reviewed under the supervision of Ramon Mendoza Reyes, P.Eng., a First Majestic employee.

(4) Silver-equivalent grade (Ag-Eq) is provided as a reference and is estimated based on metal price assumptions, metallurgical recovery for the corresponding mineral type/mineral process and the metal payable of the selling contract.

Ag-Eq Grade = Ag Grade + Au Grade * (Au Recovery * Au Payable * Au Price) / (Ag Recovery * Ag Payable * Ag Price).

b) Metal prices considered for Mineral Reserves estimates were $22.50/oz Ag and $1750/oz Au.

c) Other key assumptions and parameters include: metallurgical recoveries of 92.0% for silver, 95.7% for gold; metal payable of 99.85% for silver and 99.80% for gold; direct mining costs of $25.33/t, mill feed, process and treatment costs of $28.15/t mill feed and general and administration costs (indirect costs) of $18.00/t.

(5) A two-step constraining approach was implemented to estimate reserves for each mining method in use: a general cut-off grade was used to delimit new mining areas that will require development of access, infrastructure and all sustaining costs. A second incremental cut-off grade was considered to include adjacent mineralized material which has a recoverable value that pays for all associated costs, including but not limited to the variable cost of mining and processing, indirect costs, treatment, administration costs and plant sustaining costs but excludes the access development assumed to be covered by the block above the general cut-off grade.

(6) Modifying factors for conversion of resources to reserves include consideration of planned dilution due to geometric aspects of the designed stopes and economic zones, and additional dilution consideration due to unplanned events, materials handling and other operating aspects. Mineable shapes were used as geometric constraints.

(7) Tonnage is expressed in thousands of tonnes, metal content is expressed in thousands of ounces. Metal prices and costs expressed in USD.

(8) Numbers have been rounded as required by reporting guidelines. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

Factors which may materially affect the Mineral Reserve estimates for the Santa Elena mine include fluctuations in commodity prices and exchange rates assumptions used; material changes in the underground stability due to geotechnical conditions that may increase unplanned dilution and mining loss; unexpected variations in equipment productivity; material reduction of the capacity to process the mineralized material at the planned throughput and unexpected reduction of the metallurgical recoveries; higher than anticipated geological variability; cost escalation due to external factors; changes in the taxation considerations; the ability to maintain constant access to all working areas; changes to the assumed permitting and regulatory environment under which the mine plan was developed; the ability to maintain mining concessions and/or surface rights; the ability to renew agreements with the different surface owners in Santa Elena; and the ability to obtain and maintain social and environmental license to operate.

The Santa Elena Mine operation consists of the Santa Elena and Ermitaño underground mines. Mining activities are conducted by both First Majestic and contractor personnel.

The Santa Elena and the Ermitaño deposits vary in dip, thickness, and geotechnical conditions along strike and dip. Multiple mining methods are required to achieve the maximum efficient extraction of mineralized material at site. Three well-established methods were selected for mining extraction at Santa Elena:

Ground conditions throughout most of the Santa Elena underground workings are considered good. Bolting is used systematically in the main haulage ramps, drifts, and underground infrastructure. For those sectors that have poorer rock quality, shotcrete, mesh and/or steel arches are used.

Groundwater inflow has been increasing at depth in the Santa Elena Mine. Dewatering systems consist of main and auxiliary pumps in place in each of the active mine areas. Groundwater inflows in Ermitaño started increasing when the workings reached the 760 masl elevation. A new permanent mine dewatering system is planned to be installed in Ermitano in 2022.

The ventilation system consists of a forced air intake system through two main fans located on surface. These fans generate the necessary pressure change for return air to exhaust through the portals and ventilation raises. The ventilation system in Ermitaño is planned to use a pull system with fresh air being drawn through the main twin ramps, as well as the planned Western Access ramp. Spent air will then exhaust out of the three vent raises to surface at the centre and edges of planned mineralisation.

During 2021, the Santa Elena Mine processed a blended feed consisting of high-grade underground mineralized material and spent-ore from the existing heap-leach pad. The processing plant has been successfully operating for several years and has continuously improved silver and gold metallurgical recoveries. The process is based on cyanide tank leaching and Merrill-Crowe smelting of fine-ground ore to produce silver-gold doré bars. The installed plant capacity ranges from 2,200 tpd to 3,350 tpd. Throughput levels averaged 1,829 tpd in 2020 and 2,512 tpd in 2021.

With the introduction of mineralized material from Ermitaño, starting with industrial trials in Q4 2021, the plant will continue to process Santa Elena blended material in campaigns alternating with mineralized material from Ermitaño. There are significant differences between these two ores in hardness and metallurgical performance at different grinding sizes. To achieve optimum levels of metal recoveries and the corresponding maximum metal production, the Santa Elena ore will be processed at higher throughput rates than the Ermitaño ore during their corresponding production campaigns.

The process plant is mostly built as a single train with the crushing area split from the remaining areas and connected through a belt conveyor to transfer the crushed product to the fine stockpiles. The current leaching plant includes a grinding ball mill, one Metso-Outotec HIG-Mill, leaching tanks, three counter-current decantation or washing tanks, a previously processed leach-pad, a belt-filter facility and a filtered-tailings storage facility (FTSF). The processing plant will be upgraded in 2022 to include an additional leaching tank, a fourth CCD thickener, and a new high-capacity filter plant for dewatering tailing material.

The existing infrastructure can support current and LOM plan mining and mineral processing activities.

Most of the operation's support facilities are located within a 1.5 km radius of the main plant area, facilitating the transportation and logistics of personnel, material, and equipment. Operations personnel are transported by passenger buses from nearby towns. All equipment, supplies and materials are brought in by road.

Most non-local staff and contractor personnel stay in rental homes available in the nearby towns of Banamichi, Huepac and Aconchi. There are multiple hotels available in the area for visitors. In 2020, First Majestic constructed a temporary 310-bed temporary camp within the Santa Elena grounds to limit worker interaction with the local communities during the pandemic. This camp has been reduced in late 2021 as the workforce and community became vaccinated and the risk level of widespread virus infection reduced.

The main infrastructure consists of roads, administrative offices, a first-aid station, warehouse, assay laboratory, diesel and natural gas power generation plants, maintenance shop, water storage tanks, and water supply tank.

The FTSF has 15 Mt of storage capacity, which at current throughput rates can support approximately nine years of operation. The storage capacity of the Santa Elena FTSF is sufficient to support the LOM plan presented in the 2020 Santa Elena Technical Report.

The electric power required for the Santa Elena mine operation and supporting infrastructure is generated on-site. In 2021 a new 12.4 MW liquified natural gas ("LNG") power generation plant was constructed and commissioned at the site. This new plant replaced the diesel generation at the property, significantly reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and reducing energy costs. A further expansion to this 7-unit facility is planned for 2022 to support the new Ermitaño mine and ongoing plant upgrades including the new tailing filter plant.

Industrial water is supplied mainly from the mine dewatering system. A licensed water-well is also equipped and regularly pumps water to an elevated tank for non-process uses.

The Santa Elena mine has implemented the First Majestic Environmental Management System, which supports the implementation of environmental policy and is applied to standardize tasks and strengthen a culture focused on minimizing environmental impacts. The EMS is based on the requirements of the international standard ISO 14001:2015 and the requirements to obtain the Certificate of Clean Industry, issued by the Mexican environmental authorities, SEMARNAT, through PROFEPA. The EMS includes an annual compliance program to review all environmental obligations.

Environmental and social studies are routinely performed to characterize existing conditions and to support the preparation of Risk Assessments and Accident Prevention Programs for the operation and are documented as part of the EMS.

Santa Elena is an operating mine, as such it holds all major environmental permits and licenses required by the Mexican authorities to carry out mineral extracting activities in the mining complex. The environmental permits that are in place at the Report effective date authorize the various works and mining activities that are currently being carried out in the Santa Elena mine, in the surroundings of the site and in the Ermitaño Project.

The main environmental permit is the environmental license "Licencia Ambiental Unica" under which the mine operates its industrial facilities in accordance with the Mexican environmental protection laws administered by SEMARNAT as the agency in charge of environment and natural resources. The most recent update to the main environmental permit was approved in July 2018.

• Environmental impact assessment for the Santa Elena mine, FTSF, and the Ermitaño project;

In 2017, the Santa Elena mine started the voluntary process to obtain the Clean Industry Certification. The certification recognizes improvements in environmental management practices, regulatory compliance, and environmental performance. At the Report effective date, this program achieved significant progress including implementing a new water treatment system for mine dewatering; rainwater diversion works and a contact water pond for dry tailings management; carbon footprint reduction replacing diesel by LNG and installation of a new fire extinguisher system. The Certification program is being updated to incorporate the mine expansion and the Ermitaño Project. In February 2022, for the eighth consecutive year, Nusantara was awarded the ESR designation by the CEMEFI.

Environmental liabilities for the operation are typical of those that would be expected to be associated with an operating underground precious metals mine, including the future closure and reclamation of mine portals and ventilation infrastructure, access roads, processing facilities, power lines, filtered tailings and all surface infrastructure that supports the operations. Other potential liabilities include industrial water management, petroleum spills and carbon emissions from mobile equipment. The reclamation work carried out at Santa Elena in 2021 includes the conforming of terraces in the filtered tailings deposits in accordance with the design, and relocation of flora and fauna in the Ermitano industrial zone and the access road.

The LOM plan includes estimates for sustaining capital expenditures for the planned mining and processing activities.

Sustaining capital expenditures will mostly be allocated for on-going development in waste, infill drilling, mine equipment rebuilding, equipment overhauls or replacements, plant maintenance and on-going refurbishing, and for tailings management facilities expansion as needed. Table 16 presents the summary of the capital costs for the major components.

Table 16: Santa Elena Mining Capital Costs Summary (Sustaining Capital and Near-Mine Exploration)

Operating costs for Santa Elena have been estimated for the underground mining, processing costs, operations indirect, and general and administrative costs. First Majestic currently estimates operating costs at an average of $103.50 per tonne of ore processed based on current and projected costs. Table 17 lists the operating costs per tonne milled.

This amount of drilling is expected to continue on an annual basis while production continues, amounts required will be reviewed annually. In addition, an annual prospect generation program consisting of prospecting, soil and rock geochemical surveys, mapping, or geophysical surveys is being implemented.

In 2021 the Company continued mining the Main Vein, the Alejandras veins and the Americas veins in the Santa Elena underground mine and in October started processing ore from the Ermitaño vein, as well as continued reprocessing spent-ore material from the leach-pad. During 2021, 879,060 tonnes of mineralized material were processed with an average grade of 77 g/t Ag and 1.58 g/t Au.

Development continues in the Santa Elena mine preparing extraction levels below the elevation 460 m for the Alejandra vein and developing the Americas veins.

In Ermitaño, test mining block at elevations 793 m were extracted in the Q4-2021, development of the access ramp reached the sublevels 846, 821, 796 and 771, and the main ramp development continued to access the mineralized ore at elevation 746 m. From October to December 2021, the plant processed 103,742 tonnes of mineralized material from Ermitaño with an average grade of 54 g/t Ag and 4.83 g/t Au.

The following information on the La Encantada Silver Mine ("La Encantada mine") is based on a Technical Report prepared in accordance with NI 43‐101 and titled "First Majestic Silver Corp., La Encantada Silver Mine, Coahuila, Mexico, NI 43-101 Technical Report on Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates" with effective date of December 31, 2020 (the "2020 La Encantada Technical Report"). Reference should be made to the full text of the 2020 La Encantada Technical Report which is available for review on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

La Encantada mine is an actively producing silver mining complex owned and operated by the Company's wholly owned indirect subsidiary, Minera La Encantada, S.A. de C.V. ("Minera La Encantada"). The property is in the municipality of Ocampo, State of Coahuila, Mexico, approximately 120 kilometres northwest of the city of Melchor Múzquiz, Coahuila and approximately 120 kilometres north of the town of Ocampo, Coahuila and is centered on latitude 28°21.5'N and longitude 102°33.5'W.

Access to La Encantada is primarily by charter airplane from Durango city (about two hours flying time), or from the city of Torreón, Coahuila (about 1:15 hours flying time). Minera La Encantada operates its own private airstrip at the La Encantada mine. Driving time from the city of Melchor Múzquiz is approximately 2.5 hours by asphalt road, about five hours from the town of Ocampo and about eight hours from the international airport in Torreón city. The mine can be accessed and operated all-year round.

The La Encantada property consist of 22 exploitation concessions covering 4,076 ha. All 22 concessions are currently in good standing and expire between 2030 and 2065. Minera La Encantada holds a 100 % royalty-free interest in its concessions.

Minera La Encantada owns surface rights covering 2,237 ha on the "Cañon del Regalado" properties. This surface covers access to the mining complex, mine portals, grinding mill and flotation plant (Plant No. 1), cyanidation plant (Plant No. 2), tailings management facilities, the mine camp, offices, and an airstrip. In 2011 the Tenochtitlán Ejido filed a lawsuit against Minera La Encantada in agrarian court claiming title to 1,097 hectares of the land owned by Minera La Encantada. The initial lawsuit was decided in favour of Minera La Encantada and was followed by a series of motions and appeals regarding judicial reviews of the subsequent rulings. In August 2021, the Minera La Encantada and the Commisariat reached an agreement to settle the lawsuit; however, eight dissenting Ejido members launched a suit against the Agrarian Attorney's Office and the Commisariat to nullify the election of the members of the Commisariat. Judicial approval of the settlement agreement is pending resolution of the Dissenting Suit. Minera La Encantada also holds 19,114 ha of surface rights, "Cielo Norteño" or "Rancho El Granizo" property to the North-East of the mine covering an area with water rights. The remainder of the surface rights in the mining concession areas are held privately and through group ownership either as communal lands or Ejido lands.

Minera La Encantada has all necessary permits for current mining and processing operations, including an operating license for mining and mineral processing activities, a mine water use permit, an Environmental Impact Authorization ("EIA") for the La Encantada mine, processing plants and tailings management facilities, and a permit for power generation.

In 1967 Industrias Peñoles S.A.B. de C.V. ("Peñoles") and Tormex Industrias S.A. de C.V. established a joint venture partnership ("Minera La Encantada") to acquire and develop La Encantada. In July 2004, Peñoles awarded a contract to operate the La Encantada mine, including the processing plant and all mine infrastructure facilities, to the private Mexican company Desmin, S.A. de C.V ("Desmin"). Desmin operated the mine and processing plant until November 1, 2006, when First Majestic purchased all the outstanding shares of Desmin. Subsequently, First Majestic reached an agreement to acquire all the outstanding shares of Minera La Encantada from Peñoles. First Majestic is now the sole owner of La Encantada and all its assets, including mineral rights, surface rights position, water rights, processing plants and ancillary facilities.

From November 2006 to June 2010 La Encantada operated a 1,000 tpd flotation plant. All production during this period from the flotation plant was in the form of a lead‐silver concentrate. In 2007 La Encantada commenced construction of a cyanidation plant with a capacity of 3,750 tpd, and in 2009 began producing precipitates and silver doré bars. Commercial production was achieved on April 1, 2010, and the flotation circuit was placed in care-and-maintenance in June 2010. During 2011 several modifications were made to the cyanidation plant increasing its capacity to 4,000 tpd. Since that time, the La Encantada operation has only produced doré bars.

During the period of 2010 to 2013, La Encantada reprocessed old tailings from the flotation circuit with approximately 1,000 tpd of ore feed from the underground mine for a combined throughput of 4,000 tpd. Starting in 2014, silver market economic conditions precluded the reprocessing of tailings, and only ore production from underground workings was fed to the mill and the cyanidation plant. In August 2014, La Encantada began a plant expansion initiative to bring the crushing and grinding capacity to 3,000 tpd. The plant expansion was completed by the end of June 2015, commissioning began in July 2015, allowing for the ramp up to 3,000 tpd, which was completed by October 2015.

In 2017 La Encantada started the construction of a roasting facility with the objective of increasing recoveries when reprocessing tailings. In 2018 the main components of the roasting system were installed, and commissioning tests were started in the last quarter and continued into 2019. Observations from the commissioning tests revealed materials handling issues at the feed and discharge of the roasting system. Engineering work is in progress to resolve these issues to allow the option of processing tailings material economically.

Mine production tonnes since 2007 is summarised in Figure 3 and silver metal production ounces since 2007 is summarized in Figure 4.

La Encantada is in the Sierra Madre Oriental (SMO) fold and thrust belt where Jurassic and the Cretaceous age Sabinas Basin carbonate rocks overlie the Paleozoic Coahuiltecano terrane. Northeast-southwest oriented compression during the Cretaceous to early Tertiary Laramide Orogeny deformed the Mesozoic sedimentary rocks into a series of north-northwest-trending folds and faults, which gave rise to the SMO fold and thrust belt. Extension in the mid to late Tertiary was accompanied by widespread magmatism, with the related fault zones acting as conduits for the emplacement of shallow level intrusive rocks within the carbonate sedimentary sequence.

The Sabinas Basin Albian age Aurora Formation is the primary host rock for mineralization at La Encantada. The Aurora Formation is a thick limestone sequence comprised of a lower, middle, and upper units. The middle part of the limestone sequence consists mainly of dense, thick-bedded, grayish calcilutite, which forms the distinctive cliff faces at La Encantada. An Eocene-Oligocene age granodiorite stock and rhyolite to basalt dikes intruding the carbonate rocks produced irregular skarn, hornfels and marble aureoles.

La Encantada lies on the southwestern flank of the northwest-trending Sierra de La Encantada anticlinorium where a series of northeast-trending faults and fractures cut obliquely across the regional north-northwest-trending anticlinorium. The northeast-trending normal faults and fractures control the formation of breccia pipes and vein shoots at the intersection with the northwest-trending cross structures.

Because of its spatial relationship to the skarn alteration and mineralization, it is believed that the intrusions are genetically linked to the Ag, Pb and Zn mineralization in the property. Mineralization consists of silver, gold, lead, and zinc in deposits that occur as tabular veins, mantos, massive lens, breccia pipes, and irregular replacement bodies. Oxide minerals including Ag, Fe, Zn, Pb, Cu oxides. Sulphide minerals include native silver, acanthite, pyrite, magnetite, marmatite, galena, chalcopyrite, and covellite. The mineral deposits have been grouped into three geologic mine zones: the Prieta Complex, the San Javier-Milagros Complex, and the Vein System. The property also holds a substantial silver deposit in tailings.

La Encantada has similarities with polymetallic carbonate replacement deposits (CRD). CRD deposits are typically characterized by irregular shaped pods and lenses and roughly tabular masses of Ag, Pb, Zn mineralization hosted in carbonate rocks and associated with proximal intrusive rocks. Discordant near vertical deposits with irregular elongate shapes are referred to as chimneys and breccia pipes. Tabular sub-vertical replacement deposits are referred to as veins which can contain richer mineral shoots or small chimneys at the intersection of northwest-trending faults and fractures. Oxidized concentrations of silver, iron, lead, and zinc are hosted by carbonate sedimentary formations and sulphide mineralization is hosted at deeper structural levels in skarn alteration.

Surface exploration work completed by Minera La Encantada includes geological mapping, geochemical sampling, a natural source audio-frequency magnetotellurics geophysical survey, a regional aeromagnetic survey, an Isotopic study, and diamond drilling. Surface geologic mapping and sample geochemistry has been completed at El Camello, Anomaly B, La Escalera and El Plomo. Surface drilling has been carried out at Ojuelas in Prieta Complex, El Camello, El Plomo, Conejo Extension, Brecha Encanto, Veta Sucia and other areas with magnetic analytic signal anomalies. Underground exploration primarily consists of a combination of drilling and mine development along structures.

Total drilling between March 2011 and December 2021 amounts to more than 126,000 metres in surface and underground diamond drillholes and 193 metres of hollow stem auger drillholes. Diamond drilling typically recovers HQ size (63.5 mm core diameter) but is reduced to NQ size (47.6 mm core diameter) where required by ground conditions. Data collected from drilling includes collar surveys, downhole surveys, logging (lithology, alteration, mineralization, structure, veins, sampling, etc.), specific gravity (SG), and geotechnical information. Channel samples are also collected to support geologic modeling, resource estimation, and grade control during production. Between 2007 to 2021 Mineral La Encantada collected approximately 11,900 production channel samples from the San Javier Milagros Complex and along narrow deposits in the Vein System.

Drill core sample intervals range from 0.2 and 1.3 metres in mineralized areas. All drill core intervals selected for sampling are cut in half using a diamond blade saw. One half of the core is retained in the core box and the other half is placed in sample bags for shipment to the laboratory. Sample tickets displaying the sample number are stapled into the core box beside the sampled interval, and a copy is placed in the sample bag. Channel sample intervals range from 0.30 to 1.5 metres and are collected by mine geologists using a hammer and a hand chisel to sample a 20 cm wide swath along a sample line drawn on development faces. Sketches are collected of the sampled face, showing the location and length of each sample. Drill core and channel sample intervals are selected to reflect changes in mineralogy, lithology, and structure. All sample bags are sealed to prevent contamination during handling and transportation.

Since 1995 four different laboratories have been used for sample preparation and analysis. These include:

• First Majestic's Central Laboratory in Durango which is used for drill core and sawn-channel samples and is certified under ISO 9001:2008 in June 2015 and ISO 9001:2015 in June 2018.

• La Encantada's laboratory (La Encantada Laboratory) is used for grade control and production channel sample processing, is not certified and nis ot independent of First Majestic.

• SGS in Durango (SGS) was used for drill core and channel samples prior to 2018 and from May to December 2021 for drill core samples. During 2020 and 2021, SGS was used as a secondary laboratory for check samples. SGS is certified under ISO/IEC 17025 and is independent of First Majestic.

• Bureau Veritas Mineral Laboratories (BV) in Durango was used from 2014-2015 as a secondary lab for check samples. BV is certified under ISO/IEC 17025 and is independent of First Majestic.

At the Central Laboratory drill core samples are currently dried at 100 °C ± 5°C, crushed to 80% passing 2 mm, split to a 250-gram sub-sample and pulverized to 85% passing 75 μm. All samples are analyzed for 34 elements by a 2-acid digestion ICP method. All drill core and channel samples are also analyzed for silver by a 2 g, 3-acid digestion, atomic absorption method. Samples returning greater than 200 g/t silver are reanalyzed for silver by a 30 g, fire assay gravimetric method.

At La Encantada Laboratory samples are currently dried at 105°C, crushed to 80% passing 2 mm, split to 200 g and pulverize to 80% passing 75 μm. Samples are analyzed for silver by a 20 g fire assay gravimetric finish method. Copper, iron, lead, manganese, and zinc are analyzed by a 0.1 g 2-acid digestion atomic absorption finish.

Since 2013 samples submitted to the primary laboratories include Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) and CRMs, coarse and pulp blanks, and field, coarse and pulp duplicates. Check samples sent to a secondary laboratory was introduced in 2014 and became a common practice by 2018. All quality control results are assessed using statistical analysis and visual inspection of control plots. This process has resulted in a sample database that the Company believes is free of any significant accuracy, contamination, precision, or between laboratory bias issues.

The data verification completed to support the 2021 mineral resource estimate includes data entry error checks, visual inspections of important data collected between 2013 and 2021 from Buenos Aires, Regalo Breccia, Conejo, La Fe, La Prieta, Milagros, Ojuelas, Tailings Deposit No.4, Vein System areas (the verification data set), and a review of QAQC assay results. A random 5 % selection of drill collar locations, down hole surveys, lithology and Ag and Pb assay results of the verification dataset and specific gravity measurements were verified for transcription errors and significant outliers. Data verification through visual inspection consisted of verifying the position of collars relative to the underground workings, down-hole deviation relative to drill trace, lithology, and assay intervals relative to the three-dimension geological models. The visual inspection also included comparison of lithology and assay intervals with core photos. No significant transcription errors or outliers were observed.

The La Encantada mine is an operating mine and the metallurgical test-work data supporting the initial plant design has been proven and reinforced by plant operating results through the years of operation combined with more recent metallurgical studies.

Metallurgical testing, along with mineralogical investigation are performed periodically. The plant is continually running tests to optimize silver recovery and to reduce operating costs, even when the results are within the expected processing performance. Composite samples are analyzed monthly to determine the metallurgic recovery performance of the mineralized material fed into the processing plant. Geometallurgical studies are performed to investigate the similarities and variability related to future ore zones to be mined and processed in the mid and long term. This metallurgical testing is carried out by the Central Laboratory.

The silver content of the doré produced in La Encantada ranges from 60% to 85% due to the presence of copper, lead and zinc. The silver concentration impacts the treatment charge as this charge is levied by weight on the doré produced.

The block model Mineral Resource estimates for La Encantada were based on the current database of exploration drill holes and production channel samples, the underground level geological mapping, the geologic interpretation and model, as well as the surface topography and underground mining excavation wireframes. Geostatistical analysis, analysis of semi-variograms, block model resource estimation, and validation of the model blocks were completed.

The Mineral Resource estimates for the deposits at La Encantada are constrained by 3D geological interpretation and resource domain models. Silver estimation is restricted to detailed wireframe domain models. The domain model boundaries strictly adhere to the veins and breccia contacts with the surrounding country rock to produce reasonable representations of each deposit location and volume.

The drill hole and channel composite samples were evaluated for high-grade outliers and those outliers were capped to values considered appropriate for estimation. Outlier values at the high end of the grade distributions were identified for silver and lead from analysis of histograms plots, log cumulative probability plots, mean variance plots, and cumulative metal plots. Capping of composite sample values was limited to a select few extreme values. Outlier restriction was also used to restrict the influence of high-grade samples.

Bulk density was derived from specific gravity estimates ("SG"). Bulk density for the resource domains was either estimated into the block models from the SG data or the mean SG value was assigned.

Block grades were estimated primarily by inverse distance squared and less commonly by ordinary kriging. The method chosen in each case considered the characteristics of the domain, data spacing, variogram quality, and which method produced the best representation of grade continuity, in the opinion of the resource geologist.

All channel samples that were used during construction of the geological models were reviewed. Only those channels that completely cross the mineralized deposit were used during grade estimation. The Mineral Resources were classified into Indicated or Inferred categories based on the confidence in the geological interpretation and models, the confidence in the continuity of metal grades, the sample support for the estimation and reliability of the sample data, and on the presence of underground mining development providing detailed mapping and production channel sample support.

The Mineral Resource estimates for La Encantada are summarized in Table 18 and Table 19 using the silver cut-off grades appropriate for the mining method assigned to each domain, and an effective date of December 31, 2021. Indicated Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The qualified person for the estimate is Mr. David Rowe, CPG. Mr. Rowe is not independent of First Majestic.

Table 18: La Encantada Mineral Resource Estimate Statement, Indicated Category

Table 19: La Encantada Mineral Resource Estimate Statement, Inferred Category

1) Mineral Resource estimates are classified in accordance with the 2014 CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, whose definitions are incorporated by reference into NI 43-101.

2) The Mineral Resource estimates are based on internal estimates prepared with an effective date of December 31, 2021, by David Rowe, CPG. Mr. Rowe is not independent of First Majestic.

4) Mineral resource estimates are for silver only. The Cut-off grades used to constrain the Mineral Resource estimates are 55 g/t Ag for sub-level caving, 80 g/t Ag for cut-and-fill, 75 g/t Ag for Lonhole Stoping, and 110 g/t Ag for Tailings.

5) Tonnage is expressed in thousands of tonnes; metal content is expressed in thousands of ounces.

8) Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

Risk factors that could materially impact the Mineral Resource estimates include: metal price and exchange rate assumptions; changes to the assumptions used to calculate the silver cut-off grade; changes in the interpretations of mineralization geometry and continuity of mineralized zones; changes to geological and mineralization shape and geological and grade continuity assumptions; changes to geotechnical, mining, and metallurgical recovery assumptions; due to lack of surveying records by previous operators, the risk of finding historically mined areas in zones where resources are assumed to be in-situ could impact the reliability of the estimated tonnage and grades; changes to the assumptions related to the continued ability to access the site, retain mineral and surface rights titles, maintain environment and other regulatory permits, and maintain the social license to operate.

The Mineral Reserve estimation process consists of converting Indicated Mineral Resources to Probable Mineral Reserves by identifying material that exceeds the mining cut-off grades while conforming to specified geometrical constraints determined by the applicable mining method and applying modifying factors such as mining dilution and mining recovery factors. If the Indicated Mineral Resources comply with the previous constraints, Indicated Resource estimates are converted to Probable Mineral Reserves.

The Mineral Reserves estimates for La Encantada are tabulated in Table 20 and have an effective date of December 31, 2021. The QP for the estimate is Mr. Ramón Mendoza Reyes, P.Eng.

Table 20: La Encantada Mineral Reserves Statement (effective date of December 31, 2021)

1) Mineral Reserves have been classified in accordance with the 2014 Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, whose definitions are incorporated by reference into NI 43-101.

2) The Mineral Reserves statement provided in the table above is based on internal estimates prepared as of December 31, 2020. The information provided was prepared and reviewed under the supervision of Ramon Mendoza Reyes, P.Eng., and a Qualified Person ("QP") for the purposes of NI 43-101.

3) The Mineral Reserves were estimated from the Measured and Indicated portions of the Mineral Resource estimate. Inferred Mineral Resources were not considered to be converted into Mineral Reserves.

4) Silver grade (Ag) is estimated considering metal price assumptions, metallurgical recovery for the corresponding mineral type/mineral process and the metal payable of the selling contract.

6) Other key assumptions and parameters include: Metallurgical recoveries per domain of 60% for Prieta Complex: Ojuelas, weighted average of 65.6% for Veins Systems and 78.8% for San Javier Milagros Complex; Cut & Fill direct mining costs of $31.85/t, Longhole Stoping direct mining costs of $24.96/t, Sublevel Caving direct mining costs of $8.49/t, mill feed, process, and treatment costs of $20.86/t mill feed and general and administration (indirect costs) of $11.46/t.

7) A two-step constraining approach has been implemented to estimate reserves for each mining method in use: A general cut-off grade was used to delimit new mining areas that will require development of access, infrastructure and all sustaining costs. A second incremental cut-off grade was considered to include adjacent mineralized material which recoverable value pays for all associated costs, including but not limited to the variable cost of mining and processing, indirect costs, treatment, administration costs and plant sustaining costs but excludes the access development assumed to be covered by the block above the general cut-off grade.

8) Modifying factors for conversion of resources to reserves include consideration for planned dilution due to geometric aspects of the designed stopes and economic zones, and additional dilution consideration due to unplanned events, materials handling and other operating aspects. Mineable shapes were used as geometric constraints.

9) Tonnage is expressed in thousands of tonnes; metal content is expressed in thousands of ounces.

10) Numbers have been rounded as required by reporting guidelines. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

Factors that could affect the Mineral Reserves estimate include changes to metal prices and exchange rates; unplanned dilution; mining recovery; geotechnical conditions; equipment productivities; metallurgical recoveries; mill throughput capacities; operating cost estimates; capital cost estimates changes to the assumed permitting and regulatory environment under which the mine plan was developed; changes in the taxation conditions; ability to maintain mining concessions and/or surface rights; and ability to obtain and maintain social and environmental license to operate.

The La Encantada mine operation consists of an underground mine. Mining activities are conducted by both First Majestic and contractor personnel.

The deposits vary in dip, thickness, and geotechnical conditions along strike and dip. Multiple mining methods are required to achieve the maximum efficient extraction of mineralization. Three well-established methods were selected:

Inclined and sub-level caving is well suited for the bulk tonnage deposits at La Encantada such as the San Javier-Milagros breccias and the Ojuelas deposit.

Longhole stoping is being used for near-vertical structures that are relatively consistent along strike and length and have competent wall rock. The minimum planned mining width is 1.4 m, based on a minimum vein width of 1.0 m plus an allowance for 0.2 m on the hangingwall and footwall.

Cut-and-fill is performed using jackleg drilling and is used for vein deposits that are irregular in nature and commonly possess poorer geotechnical conditions. The minimum mining width is 1.3 m, based on a minimum vein width of 1.0 m and an additional 0.15 m was added to both the hangingwall and footwall as planned dilution.

Ground conditions throughout most of the La Encantada mine are considered good. In contrast, the breccia and massive lens-type deposits form weak, soft material that lends itself to caving mining methods. The vein deposits possess fair rock quality and are hosted in competent limestone. Waste pillars are left where necessary to increase stability in longhole stoping.

All working areas are above the water table which is at 1,420 masl. The main water inflow comes from surface filtration during the rainy season. Mine water is pumped from the lowest elevation of 1,510 masl to surface.

The processing plant has been operating for several years and has continuously improved silver metallurgical recoveries. The metallurgical test-work data supporting the initial plant design has been proven and reinforced by plant operating results through years of operation combined with more recent metallurgical studies.

The processing plant is divided into two areas: Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2. Plant No. 1 consists of the crushing and grinding circuits, while Plant No. 2 is the leaching circuit. The process is based on cyanide tank leaching and Merrill-Crowe of ground mineralized material (ROM) to produce silver doré bars. The installed plant capacity is for 3,000 tpd for the crushing and grinding area, and 4,500 tpd for the leaching circuit.

The plant-feed material is delivered from the underground ROM and discharged into a steel-made coarse ore-bin of 300 t capacity. The coarse ROM is crushed in a three-stage crushing circuit. The crushing plant has a capacity of 3,000 tpd at 18 operating hours per day.

The grinding section is comprised of one Metso ball mill. The nominal capacity of the mill is 3,000 tpd. The cyanide leaching circuit process adds cyanide to leach tanks and lime in slurry form is added as a pH modifier.

Most of the overflow solution from the intermediate thickener goes to the primary thickener, which produces pregnant leach solution ("PLS") and is fed to the Merrill Crowe system.

Metallurgical testing, together with mineralogical investigation are periodically performed. The plant is continually running tests to optimize silver recovery and to reduce operating costs, even when the results are within the expected processing performance. Composite samples are analyzed monthly to determine the metallurgical recovery performance of the mineralized material fed into the processing plant. Geometallurgical studies are performed to investigate the similarities and variability related to mineralization to be mined and processed in the mid- and long-term. This metallurgical testing is carried out by the Central Laboratory.

Samples from the Ojuelas deposit were tested by the Central Laboratory using current plant parameters. The expected recovery of silver for the Ojuelas mineralized material varies between 52.2-62.0%, and if reagents are optimized there is potential for the recovery to increase from 56.4-65.6%.

Mineralized material from the Ojuelas deposit also contains significant base metals: 6% of lead and 5% of zinc. Additional bench-scale testing was conducted on this material utilizing flotation as an alternative processing route to investigate the opportunity to recover the base metals contents and improve the silver recovery. Preliminary results are encouraging as recoveries of 70-75% for silver and 75% for lead have been observed.

It has been observed that the presence of manganese limits the recovery of silver. A number of tests were conducted on material with high manganese content with the objective of validating the implementation of roasting as a conditioning stage prior to cyanide leaching. Some of these tests showed silver recoveries in the range of 57-73% and supported the addition of a roasting circuit to treat the material from the Tailings Deposit No. 4, pre-conditioning the material before the leaching process. The roasting circuit is currently inoperative but is the object of studies to determine required modifications and upgrades to the cooling stage and materials handling to enable its re-commissioning.

Roasting tests were also conducted on samples of ROM material from deposits with high manganese content, which is refractory in nature. Mineralized material from the Buenos Aires deposit showed silver recoveries in the range of 68-71% when leached after being roasted.

The metallurgical recovery projections assumed in the life-of-mine (LOM) plan are supported by the historical performance in the processing plant as well as on the results of recent testing. Variability of silver recovery estimates was addressed in the LOM plan by projecting metallurgical recoveries for different domains based on actual performance of the mineralized material from areas currently in operation, such as San Javier-Milagros complex breccias and the Veta Dique San Francisco. Variability is also monitored for LOM plan purposes by projecting recoveries based on laboratory test-work for domains that are planned to be later in the LOM plan, such as Ojuelas, Conejo, and other vein system deposits. The average yearly silver recovery currently projected in the LOM plan ranges from 60-68%.

The silver content of the doré produced in La Encantada ranges from 60-85% due to the presence of copper, lead and zinc.

The existing infrastructure at La Encantada can support current mining and mineral processing activities and the LOM plan.

Most of the operation's support facilities are located near the Plant No. 1 and include administrative offices, a medical clinic, warehouse, assay laboratory, core shed, fuel storage facilities, mine compressor building, surface maintenance shop, mine dry, water storage tanks and contractor offices. The mine camp is located approximately 1 km west of Plant No. 1 and the First Majestic owned airstrip is approximately 6 km west from the mine camp. Plant No. 2 is located 2 km north-west of Plant No. 1 and holds the leaching and roasting processing facilities, including the tailings filter-press plant.

The La Encantada Tailings Management Facilities (TMF) is comprised of two different storage areas. Tailings Deposit No. 5 (TMF-5) is currently in operation and Tailings Deposit No.4 is inactive and holds the material considered for potential reprocessing by roasting. Rainwater management for the TMF includes two main diversion channels. Temporary contact water channels have been built to the north of the facility to distribute the contact water downstream where there is an impervious watershed. Contact water is also diverted to two storage ponds for industrial recycling.

The storage capacity of the TMF-5 is 8.5 Mt of filtered tailings. According to the latest survey conducted in February 2021, the remaining storage capacity is estimated to be approximately 5.5 Mt or more than 5 years of service life at current production rate, which is sufficient to support the LOM plan.

First Majestic's facilities include a camp previously constructed by Peñoles. These facilities were significantly improved in 2020 and include 160 housing units for workers and staff with 440 beds, a new 180-person kitchen/dining area for employees, accommodations for contractor managers and visitors, offices for the union representatives, an elementary school, a chapel, a grocery store, and upgraded medical clinic, and recreational facilities.

Power demand is presently 4,000 MW per month, which is being supplied by four 1.5 MW MTU natural gas generators and one the 1.5 MW MTU diesel generator, achieving an average mix of 90% natural gas - 10% diesel generation, significantly reducing the greenhouse gas emissions and the energy generation costs. In 2021 First Majestic added a fifth 1.5 MW MTU generator, which further reduces greenhouse gas emissions and energy costs, and provides redundant power capacity. Continuous operation of the additional generator was reached in Q4-2021.

Fresh water for the offices and employee housing is obtained from a well located in the underground mine. Industrial water for the mine and plant is obtained from a series of wells located 25 km away from the La Encantada mine. This water is pumped to site and stored in a series of storage tanks located throughout the plant and mine facilities.

The La Encantada mine has all of the necessary permits for current mining and processing operations, such as an operating license for mining and mineral processing activities, a mine water use permit, an Environmental Impact Authorization ("EIA") for the La Encantada mine, processing plants and TMF, and a permit for power generation.

In February 2022, for the second consecutive year the La Encantada mine was designated as an ESR by the CEMEFI. The ESR award is given to companies operating in Mexico that achieve high performance and commitment to sustainable economic, social, and environmentally positive impact in all areas.

Environmental liabilities for the operation are typical of those that would be expected to be associated with an operating underground precious metals mine, including the future closure and reclamation of mine portals and ventilation infrastructure, access roads, processing facilities, power lines, filtered tailings deposits and all surface infrastructure that supports the operations. Other potential liabilities include industrial water management, petroleum spills and carbon emissions from mobile equipment. The reclamation work carried out at La Encantada in 2021 includes the conforming of terraces in the filtered tailings deposits in accordance with the design, reforestation and relocation of flora from areas to be impacted by subsidence.

The LOM plan includes estimates for sustaining capital expenditures for the planned mining and processing activities.

Sustaining capital expenditures will mostly be allocated for on-going development in waste, infill drilling, mine equipment rebuilding, equipment overhauls or replacements, plant maintenance and on-going refurbishing, and for tailings management facilities expansion as needed. Table 21 presents the summary of the sustaining and expansionary capital expenditures.

Operating costs for La Encantada have been estimated for the underground mining, processing costs, operation's indirect, and general and administrative costs. First Majestic currently estimates operating costs at an average of $46.90 per tonne of ore processed based on current and projected costs.

This amount of drilling is expected to continue on an annual basis while production continues, and amounts required will be reviewed annually.

In 2021 the Company continued operating the caving system in the San Javier Breccia while mining mineralized material from historical mined areas, in particular the La Prieta area, and the extraction of backfill material.

Total mill throughput in 2021 was 1.04 M tonnes grading an average of 130 g/t Ag which resulted in 3.24 million ounces of silver being produced, in comparison with 3.51 million ounces of silver produced in 2020. The decrease in production was primarily due to an 20% decrease in silver head grade partially offset by an increase of 17% in tonnes milled.

Development and production activities will continue in the underground mine, currently extracting material from the La Prieta complex breccia, the San Javier breccia and from historically mined areas that are out of the Mineral Reserve estimates due to the complexity to drill, survey and compile the estimates.

Mine development is currently focused in preparing the Milagros breccia area for production using the sublevel caving method. Also, development will be focused in preparing the extension of the 660 orebodies in an area known as the Beca zone which sits on the upper part of the Ojuelas orebody.

Except as indicated below, the following information on the Jerritt Canyon Gold Mine is based on a Technical Report prepared in accordance with NI 43‐101 and titled "Technical Report on the Jerritt Canyon Gold Mine, Elko County, Nevada, USA" with effective date of December 31, 2020 (the "2020 Jerritt Canyon Technical Report"). Reference should be made to the full text of the 2020 Jerritt Canyon Technical Report which is available for review on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

Jerritt Canyon is owned by Jerritt Canyon Gold LLC ("JCG"), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Jerritt Canyon consists of the permitted and operating Jerritt Canyon processing plant and two producing gold mines - SSX-Steer Complex ("SSX") and Smith.

Jerritt Canyon is located in Elko County, northeastern Nevada. The mill site, shops, and administration and security buildings are located approximately 45 miles north of the town of Elko. The Jerritt Canyon property forms an irregular area that extends approximately 17 miles north-south and 17 miles east-west at its widest, and covers a surface area of 30,821 hectares (76,160 acres). The Jerritt Canyon property is bounded by 116° 10' west and 115° 78" west longitude and 41° 23' north and 41° 46' north latitude. The Jerritt Canyon property boundaries have been surveyed and established by digitizing land holding boundaries on the perimeter of the land position.

Jerritt Canyon operations are located on a combination of public and private lands, with the deposits and mining related surface facilities being located primarily on mining claims in United States Forest Service land within the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest. The process facilities, offices, shops, and tailings dams are located on private land owned by JCG. Additional claims in the southern part of the land package are mostly located on private land with some located on land administered by the United States Bureau of Land Management.

Land tenure on the Jerritt Canyon property includes patented claims, unpatented claims, and fee land.

Certain of the Jerritt Canyon claims and fee lands are subject to NSR royalties which vary from 1.5% to 6% depending upon the lease agreements with various property owners. The access road from State Route 225 (SR225) to the property is approximately 7 miles long and is entirely built over deeded land acquired by the company. The first 1.9 miles of the access road starting from SR225, referred to as Parcel 4, has a 49% mineral reservation for the Rancho Grande, owned by the Simplot Co. The remaining 5.1 miles of the road have no reservations listed. There are currently three Nevada lease file agreements that cover land that has mine production. The lease holders of the producing land are entitled to receive production royalty payments that range from 2.5% to 10%. Other land held by lease holders may be subject to annual or semi-annual land payments that include advance royalties, land use payments, rentals, loss of grazing, and the use of land for a communications tower. The advance royalties are the minimum amounts the lease holders are entitled to annually. On producing land, these advance royalties may be recovered by JCG if certain production royalty thresholds are met or surpassed during the production year. Some of the land payments may be adjusted annually based on consumer/producer price indexes or annual increases. There is also a Per Ton Royalty Interest on the Jerritt Canyon processing facilities and an additional 0.5% net smelter returns royalty on the entire Jerritt Canyon property held by Ely Gold Royalties Inc.

The Jerritt Canyon deposit was discovered by Food Machinery Corporation in 1972. In 1976, Meridian Gold LLC and Freeport Minerals Company formed a joint venture to explore and develop the gold deposits in the Jerritt Canyon area and, in 1980, mining commenced with production from the North Generator and Marlboro Canyon open pit mines. The first gold production from Jerritt Canyon occurred in July 1981.

Open pit mining was conducted from early 1981 until late 1999, with the mining carried out in the areas of Marlboro Canyon, Alchem, Lower North Generator Hill, Upper North Generator Hill, West Generator, Burns Basin, Mill Creek, Pattani Springs, California Mountains, Dash, Winters Creek, Steer Canyon, and Saval Canyon. The annual production from these areas ranged from approximately 40,000 ounces to 1.4 million ounces.

Underground operations started in 1997 at SSX, and continued until 2008 with production from the Steer, Murray, MCE, Smith, West Generator, and Saval deposits. In 2009, the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection approved plans for the recommencement of Jerritt Canyon production. Also in 2009, a new mine plan was prepared. Underground mining from the Smith deposit recommenced in late January 2010 and underground mining at SSX recommenced in early October 2010.

From the commencement of mining in 1980 to the end of 2021, approximately 9.8 million ounces of gold ("Moz Au") were produced from approximately 45.3 million tonnes ("Mt") of ore mined at an average grade of 6.77 grams of gold per tonne ("g/t Au"). Open pit mining at Jerritt Canyon produced a total of approximately 5.2 Moz Au from approximately 27.0 Mt of ore at an average grade of 6.0 g/t Au. The underground mines produced a total of approximately 4.5 Moz Au from approximately 18.2 Mt of ore at an average grade of 7.9 g/t Au. Since 2010, the majority of production has come from the SSX and Smith deposits.

From June 2015 to December 2021, JCG mined approximately 5.5 M tonnes at an average grade of 4.3 g/t Au containing a total of approximately 0.76 M oz Au.

The Jerritt Canyon district is located in the Great Basin, north and northeast of the Carlin Trend of gold deposits. Carlin type gold mineralization at Jerritt Canyon is hosted by silty carbonate or carbonaceous siliciclastic rocks originally deposited as shelf sedimentary rocks during the Paleozoic. The Paleozoic host rocks have been imbricated, faulted, and folded through several orogenic events through the Paleozoic and Mesozoic. An early phase of intrusive igneous activity is represented by west-northwest mafic igneous dikes of Paleozoic age. Carlin type gold deposits were emplaced in the Middle to Late Eocene during an initial phase of extensional tectonics at which time high potassium calc-alkaline magmatic rocks were emplaced. Mafic and intermediate igneous dikes were emplaced during this phase of igneous activity and trend north-northeast.

The occurrence and distribution of gold mineralization at Jerritt Canyon is controlled both by lithology and structure. Gold mineralization at Jerritt Canyon is hosted by Hanson Creek Formation units I to III and the lower part of the Roberts Mountains Formation. The Saval discontinuity, being the contact between the Hanson Creek and the Roberts Mountain Formations, is interpreted as a primary control on gold mineralization at Jerritt Canyon. Gold mineralization is hosted by, or spatially associated, with high angle west-northwest- and north-northeast-trending structures. Much of the more continuous gold mineralization occurs within the favourable stratigraphic intervals along the limbs or hinge zones of large anticlinal folds, and at the intersection of the two sets of high angle structures. The mineralized zones form along well defined structural and mineralization trends as stratigraphically controlled tabular pods that are locally stacked upon one another resulting from the presence of more than one favourable stratigraphic unit and/or local thrust and/or high angled fault intersection controls. The deposits are Carlin type, sediment-hosted gold mineralization within carbonaceous sediments. Gold occurs as very fine-grained micron-sized particles as grain boundaries or inclusions in pyrite, and as free grains in carbonaceous-rich and fine-grained, calcareous, clastic sedimentary rocks.

Alteration in the Jerritt Canyon district includes silicification, dolomitization, remobilization, and reconstitution of organic carbon, decalcification, argillization, and pyritization (typically containing elevated arsenic). The rocks also exhibit hypogene and supergene oxidation and bleaching. The most important alteration types relative to gold deposition are silicification, remobilization, and reconstitution of organic carbon, pyritization, and decalcification.

Jerritt Canyon is a Carlin-type gold deposit, hydrothermal in origin and usually structurally controlled. Current models attribute the genesis of Carlin-type gold deposits to:

Jerritt Canyon is hosted by silty carbonate or carbonaceous siliciclastic rocks originally deposited as shelf sedimentary rocks during the Paleozoic age. The Paleozoic host rocks have been imbricated, faulted, and folded through several orogenic events in the Paleozoic and Mesozoic. An early phase of intrusive igneous activity is represented by west-northwest mafic igneous dikes of Paleozoic age.

Carlin-type gold deposits were emplaced during the Middle to Late Eocene during an initial phase of extensional tectonics at which time high potassium calc-alkaline magmatic rocks were emplaced. Mafic and intermediate igneous dikes were emplaced during this phase of igneous activity and demarcate north-northeast-oriented structures. The primary controls on the occurrence, distribution, and form of the deposits are:

In general terms, the intersection of structures with favourable host rocks is the primary control and the form of mineralization ranges from apparently stratabound to fault hosted where the faults can be either highly discordant to bedding or bedding-parallel. Deposits at Jerritt Canyon are mostly stratabound or fault hosted. Gold occurs as very fine, micron sized, particles in pyrite and arsenian pyrite. Other sulfides are orpiment, realgar, and stibnite. Alteration includes carbonatization, decalcification, and silicification (jasperoid).

Exploration completed by JCG has included desktop compilation and interpretation of historical datasets, target identification, and reverse circulation ("RC") and core drilling. Drilling completed at Jerritt Canyon by JCG includes two phases of surface drilling and on-going underground drilling. In the fall of 2015, JCG initiated a comprehensive compilation of all historical geophysical data for Jerritt Canyon as well as a compilation of past surface geochemistry including soil, stream sediment, and bedrock sampling, completed to 2015. Interpretation of these compilations incorporated geology, gold distribution, and past surface exploration drilling and resulted in the identification of exploration targets and development of a surface RC exploration program, which was executed in the fall of 2016.

In early 2017, JCG commissioned further detailed evaluation of the historical gravity data, inversion and examination of DIGHEM EM and magnetic data, inversion and examination of the ground magnetic data, and examination of the Titan survey results.

In the spring of 2017, JCG commissioned Goldspot Discoveries Inc. ("Goldspot") to complete a machine learning (AI) compilation, interpretation, and targeting study. The 2017 study incorporated several datasets from Jerritt Canyon including drilling (lithology and assay), surface geology, topography, soil geochemistry, gravity, DIGHEM EM, magnetic, and radiometric data. Goldspot incorporated hyperspectral data into the compilation and interpretation. Based on the 2017 study, Goldspot generated target areas, planned drill holes, and completed a 3D geological model incorporating structural and lithological information in Leapfrog software.

Starting January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2021, JCG has drilled more than 901 km between RC and core from underground and surface drilling sites.

The JCG Mineral Resource estimates are based on logging and sampling of core, underground RC drilling (Cubex), and surface RC drilling. The entire length of drill core is photographed and logged for lithology, mineralization, structure, and alteration. Sample intervals are based on geology and mineralogy, are typically three feet long, and respect geological contacts. Where core is geologically and mineralogically uniform over extended lengths, samples are designated by the run length blocks in which case the samples are five feet long. The core is sawn in half for sampling using a core saw equipped with a diamond blade. Half of the core is placed in a sample bag, while the remaining half is returned to the core box. Logged data is recorded into the acQuire Database System. Underground RC Cubex samples are collected in five-foot intervals from the collar. Surface RC samples are collected in five-foot samples using a cyclone/splitter.

Before 2016, surface and underground core samples were dispatched to ALS Limited ("ALS"), Bureau Veritas Laboratories ("BVL"), America Assay Laboratory ("AAL") and JCG laboratory for sample preparation and analysis. Since 2016, surface RC samples have been prepared and analyzed at BVL in Sparks, Nevada and underground core samples have been prepared and analyzed at the JCG laboratory. Since November 2021, underground core samples have been prepared and analyzed at Paragon Geochemical in Sparks, Nevada. Before 2021, all underground RC Cubex samples have been prepared and analyzed at the JCG Laboratory. Since 2021, Cubex samples are prepared at JCG laboratory and assayed either at JCG laboratory or at ALS laboratory in Reno Nevada.

AAL and ALS are commercial certified laboratories independent of First Majestic. Both laboratories are located in Sparks, Nevada and received ISO 9001 certifications for their quality management system. BVL is a commercial laboratory that is independent of First Majestic, and its preparation and analytical facilities in Sparks, Nevada are accredited to ISO 9001:2008 for their quality management system and to ISO/IEC 17025:2005 for their competence of laboratory testing of gold samples by fire assay. Paragon Geochemical received ISOO 9001:2015 certification and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 for their competence of laboratory testing of gold samples by fire assay. The JCG laboratory is not certified and is not independent of First Majestic.

At BVL samples are dried, crushed and pulverized, which includes crushing to 70% passing less than 2 mm and pulverizing a 250-g split to 85% passing 200 mesh. A 30-g split of the pulverized sample is taken for fire assay and analyzed using an AAS finish. Samples that return a gold value greater than 10 g/t Au in procedure FA430 are re-analyzed with a gravimetric finish. Samples are barcoded at the crusher stage and tracked through all steps of the analysis. Results are reported to JCG via a CSV data file and hard copy certificate.

At AAL the sample preparation procedure includes a two-stage crushing method, the primary crush is by a jaw crusher reducing the sample to less than 6 mesh and the secondary is by roll crusher which reduces the sample to 80% passing 10 mesh. A 300-g split is taken using a riffle splitter and pulverized to 85% passing 150 mesh. Analysis is by 30-g fire assay with ICP determination and by a 30-g fire assay followed by a gravimetric finish for samples over 10 g/t Au.

At ALS samples are dried, pulverized up to 250g to 85% passing 75 um and then analyzed for Au by Fire Assay with AA finish. Samples returning Au greater than 10 ppm are analyzed by 30 g Fire Assay Gravimetric Finish (FAGF).

At Paragon Geochemical samples are pulverized up to 250 to 85% passing 75 um and then analyzed for Au by Fire Assay - Aqua Regia Digest with AAS finish. Samples returning Au greater than 8 ppm are analyzed by 30 g FAGF.

At JCG Assay laboratory samples are dried, crushed to 65% passing 10 mesh. The entire sample is then split to obtain a 200 g split. The 200-g split is pulverized to 80% passing 200 mesh and split again to obtain a sub-sample of approximately 15 g. Samples are analyzed by aqua regia digestion with atomic absorption spectrometry ("AAS") finish to obtain a final Au value in oz/t. LECO analysis and moisture determination are additional tests conducted by JCG laboratory. Currently, the JCG laboratory is implementing LabWare LIMS for assay reporting FAGF.

Since 2008, underground core, RC Cubex and surface RC samples submitted to the primary laboratories include Certified Reference Materials, blanks, and pulp duplicates. All quality control results are assessed using statistical analysis and visual inspection of control plots. The analysis of QA/QC data collected for Jerritt Canyon from 2008 to 2021 concluded that no significant grade accuracy, precision, or contamination issues were observed. Data verification included data entry error checks, visual inspections of important data, review of historical data and assay results collected between 2018 and 2020. No significant transcription errors were observed. Since 2021, data verification consists in data entry errors checks, review of the QA/QC assay results, verifying the position of collars relative to the underground workings, down-hole deviation relative to drill trace, lithology, and assay intervals relative to the three-dimension geological models. No significant errors have been detected during this verification.

Historical gold grade-recovery relationships for three different time periods, 1) 1981 to 2020, 2)1989 to 2020 and 3) 1997 to 2020 have been identified. The first period is inception-to-date, the second period begins when the roaster was commissioned, and the third period begins when chlorination was discontinued. The inception-to-date metallurgical performance and the performance from 1989 to 2020 are essentially the same. The 1997 to 2020 the data indicates a slightly higher sensitivity of gold recovery to feed grade. The QP notes that the data are scattered and the correlations of the three lines are low suggesting that variables other than head grade, including sulfide sulfur oxidation, total organic carbon ("TOC"), and roaster performance contribute to changes in gold recovery. SLR notes that the process operating data indicate very consistent plant feed and operational performance and, with the low correlation between grade and recovery, the use of near-term historical averages would provide a reasonable gold recovery value for planning purposes. The operation is currently using a constant average gold recovery of 86% for the life of mine ("LOM") plan and budget. The consistency in recovery could be affected by changes in mineralogical characteristics as new ore-types are encountered in the future. The design recovery of the whole ore roaster using oxygen instead of air was 87% to 90%. Pilot plant testing of the oxygen roasted calcine by Dorr Oliver (1987) achieved an average gold recovery of 88%. SLR notes that the process continues to operate consistently in the design range depending primarily on roaster performance, as some of the mineralized materials are reported to have zero gold recovery without oxidation. The main deleterious elements are arsenic and mercury. The processing plant is designed with the appropriate gas cleaning systems including mercury scrubbing from the gas streams and mercury collection from the refinery retort condenser.

The block model Mineral Resource estimates for the Jerritt Canyon deposits are based on the current database of exploration drill holes, the geological interpretation and model, as well as surface topography and underground and open pit mining excavation wireframes. Geostatistical analysis, analysis of semi-variograms, block model resource estimation, and validation of the model blocks were completed.

The dominant gold mineralization trends were identified based on the 3D numeric models in each domain. To establish the gold grade continuity within the domains, model variograms for composite values were developed along the trends identified, and the nugget values were established from downhole variograms.

Block grades were estimated by ordinary kriging ("OK") or inverse distance squared ("ID2"). The method chosen in each case considered the characteristics of the domain, data spacing, variogram quality, and which method produced the best representation of grade continuity. The grade estimation was completed in two successive passes. The first pass only estimated blocks within a restricted short distance from the composite samples. The second pass applied less restrictive criteria.

The Mineral Resource estimates for Jerritt Canyon are summarized in Table 23 and Table 24 using the gold cut-off grade appropriate for the mining method assigned to each domain. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves and have an effective date of December 31, 2021. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

Table 23: Jerritt Canyon Mineral Resource Estimates, Measured and Indicated Category
(Effective date December 31, 2021)

Table 24: Jerritt Canyon Mineral Resource Estimates, Inferred Category
(Effective Date December 31, 2021)

2. The Mineral Resources information provided above is based on internal estimates prepared as of December 31, 2021. The mineral resource estimates were prepared by Karla Michelle Calderon and Helbert Taylor Vieira under the supervision of David Rowe, CPG, who has the appropriate relevant qualifications, and experience in geology and resource estimation.

3. Mineral resource estimates are for gold only. Ag-Eq ounces are provided as reference and were calculated as:

7. Gold cut-off grades considered to constrain the resources were 2.8 g/t for underground mining and 1.4 g/t for open pit mining were based on actual and budgeted operating and sustaining costs.

8. Tonnage is expressed in thousands of tonnes; metal content is expressed in thousands of ounces.

10. Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

Risk factors that could materially impact the Mineral Resource estimate include: metal price assumptions; changes in the interpretations of mineralization geometry and continuity of mineralized zones; changes to geotechnical, mining, and metallurgical recovery assumptions; and changes to the assumptions related to the continued ability to access the site, retain mineral and surface right titles, maintain environment and other regulatory permits, and maintain the license to operate.

The Jerritt Canyon underground Mineral Reserves were estimated by generating potentially economic tri-dimensional shapes generated using Deswik's stope optimizer ("DSO") and applying mine designs to the end-of-year as-built survey solids. The design methodology uses both cut-off grade estimation and economic analysis to design and validate the Mineral Reserves.

Stopes and development tasks were classified in the Mineral Resource classification based on the majority of material in the task.

The stopes shapes to be used in Mineral Reserves were selected first by filtering or identifying stopes based primarily on their proximity to existing historical mine workings, open pits, and infrastructure, and secondly, by identifying large and continuous regions of stopes. Stopes within 15 ft of historical mine workings were identified and flagged due to a lack of knowledge or confidence in the quality or type of backfill used in those workings. At SSX, a risk factor was applied to these stopes. Measured stopes with a risk factor were classified as Probable, and measured stopes with no risk classified as Proven. At Smith, any material within 15 ft of existing workings was excluded from the Mineral Reserves and material classes were based on block model output.

The natural water table at both SSX and Smith is situated at 6,600 feet above sea level ("FASL") or 2,012 m above sea level ("masl"). Mineral Reserves below the natural water table will require dewatering to rehabilitate old workings or to drive new headings. Operating costs estimates have taken dewatering into account as an ongoing activity, and no different cut-off grades has been considered below the natural water table.

(2) The Mineral Reserve statement provided in the table above have an effective date of December 31, 2021. The Mineral Reserve estimates were prepared by Rebeca Barja under the supervision of Ramón Mendoza Reyes, P.Eng., and a Qualified Person ("QP") for the purposes of NI 43-101 who has the appropriate relevant qualifications, and experience in mining and mineral reserves estimation.

(a) Metallurgical recoveries of 84.76% for gold; metal payable of 99.9% for gold; direct mining costs of $98.41/t for Underhand Cut-and-Fill, processing costs of $54.19/t mill feed, indirect and G&A costs of $23.50/t and overall sustaining costs of $40.02/t.

(b) Metal prices considered were $1,750/oz Au; and $22.50/oz Ag for silver-equivalent conversion.

(5) A two-step constraining approach has been implemented to estimate reserves for the underhand cut-and-fill mining method in use: A General Cut-Off Grade (GC) of 5.01 g/t Au was used to delimit new mining areas that will require development of access, infrastructure and all sustaining costs. A second Incremental Cut-Off Grade (IC) of 2.88 g/t Au was considered to include adjacent mineralized material which recoverable value pays for all associated costs, including but not limited to the variable cost of mining and processing, indirect costs, treatment, administration costs and plant sustaining costs but excludes the access development assumed to be covered by the block above the GC grade.

(6) Modifying factors for conversion of resources to reserves include consideration for planned dilution due to geometric aspects of the designed stopes and economic zones, and additional dilution consideration due to unplanned events, materials handling and other operating aspects. Mineable shapes were used as geometric constraints.

(7) Tonnage is expressed in thousands of tonnes; metal content is expressed in thousands of ounces. Metal prices and costs expressed in USD.

(8) Numbers have been rounded as required by reporting guidelines. Totals may not sum due to rounding.

The QP preparing these estimates is not aware of any mining, metallurgical, infrastructure, permitting, or other relevant factors that could materially affect the Mineral Reserve estimate.

The cut-off grade used for the Mineral Reserves is 5.01 g/t Au, and the inputs are provided in Table 26. Incremental stopes were included at a grade of 2.88 g/t Au.

The Jerritt Canyon property has been in operation since 1980. Between 1981 and 1999, mining was carried out by open pit. Underground operations began in 1993 with the opening of the Murray mine and West Gen underground mine. Underground operations started in 1997 at SSX, and continued until 2008 with production from the Steer, Murray, MCE, Smith, West Generator, and Saval deposits. In 2009, a new mine plan was prepared. Underground mining from the Smith deposit recommenced in late January 2010 and underground mining at SSX recommenced in early October 2010.

Mining is carried out using the underhand cut-and-fill mining method at the Smith and SSX. A significant portion of the Mineral Resources at Smith and SSX are located below the water table and requires dewatering. Dewatering infrastructure, including pumps, dewatering wells and water treatment facilities are in operation and expansion of these facilities has been considered in the life-of-mine plan as needed.

The processing facilities at Jerritt Canyon are designed to operate at a rate of 4,500 tons per day ("stpd") with an operating availability of 90% and are permitted to operate at 6,000 stpd. The facilities include, primary crushing, ore drying, secondary crushing, tertiary crushing, dry grinding, roasting, thickening, cil, carbon stripping, carbon reactivation, electrowinning, electrowinning sludge refining, oxygen plant, cooling pond, water evaporation pond, and tailing impoundment.

Jerritt Canyon has been in commercial production for approximately 39 years and the infrastructure to support a mining and milling operation is established. Surface rights to sustain mining operations on the Jerritt Canyon property are secured through current ownership and claim holder rights. The current infrastructure includes:

The main access road is approximately seven miles long and is a 6.7 m wide paved road between Nevada highway 225 and the mill site. A 30 m wide haul road provides access between the mines and the mill site. This road network is approximately 27 km long.

Power to Jerritt Canyon is purchased from Nevada Energy through a 125 kV, three-phase transmission line. Monthly power consumption is approximately 8.0 MWh.

Water available on site is sufficient to support all mining and milling operations. All water used at Jerritt Canyon is from permitted and certificated water rights held by JCG and regulated by the Nevada Division of Water Resources.

For the management and disposal of tailings and reduction of surplus process solutions, Jerritt Canyon operates one active tailings storage facility ("TSF 2") and two main process water storage facilities which include the water storage reservoir ("WSR") and the evaporation pond. Jerritt Canyon also operates two process water treatment plants ("WTP") to remove process water contaminates in an effort to reduce process water inventories and maintain an overall negative site water balance. JCG is currently in the process of closing and reclaiming TSF-1, which was the first tailing storage facility constructed and continuously operated at Jerritt Canyon between 1980 and 2014.

TSF 2 was originally commissioned in 2013 as TSF 2 Phase 1 to store approximately 3.7 Mst of tailings. In 2018, TSF 2 was expanded as to store an additional 1.5 Mst of tailings. Tailings slurry is delivered to the TSF 2 in a slurry consisting of 40 tons solids to 60 tons water by weight. The TSF 2 Phase 3 was designed to contain an additional 1.1 Mst of tailings and was completed in 2021.

TSF 2 Phase 4 was designed to allow storage of an additional 1.7 Mst of tailings and was completed in Q3-2021. Assuming a planned production rate of 2,350 stpd, TSF 2 Phase 4 will be filled to capacity by December 2023; however, this date will vary depending on actual mine plan and production rates determined by operations.

After TSF 2 Phase 4 is filled to capacity, JCG plans to dispose of future tailings in the previously designed and approved TSF 3, which is the existing WSR that will be converted to accept tailings disposal. The WSR's conversion to TSF 3 will allow disposal of approximately of 2.4 Mst of tailings. At an assumed average production rate of 2,350 stpd, TSF 3 would provide approximately 2.6 years tailings storage. If the average deposition rate is increased for the 2021 mine plan and following, the timeline for creation of additional tailings management area will be shortened proportionally.

The process WTP was constructed to eliminate the surplus process water inventory located in the Jerritt Canyon WSR and evaporation pond and to create additional storage capacity for future tailings storage. The process WTP's treated permeate is disposed of in injection wells while its brine concentrate is disposed of in the evaporation pond.

Jerritt Canyon has been in operation since 1981. Prior to and during operation, numerous environmental studies and evaluations have been conducted to support permit applications and operations. An Environmental Impact Statement was completed, and the Record of Decision was issued in 1980. Operating permits are in place and current.

The historic operation of Jerritt Canyon resulted in a number of material environmental concerns, including air emission exceedances, ground water contamination from the TSF1 tailings storage facilities, lack of water treatment capacity, and surface water contamination from the rock disposal areas.The Company inherited this legacy and has been working diligently to mitigate the concerns since it took over the operation April 30, 2021.

Approved closure and reclamation plans are in place for Jerritt Canyon. The total reclamation costs incurred in 2021 was $0.6 million. An updated reclamation plan and cost estimate was submitted to the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection ("NDEP") in November of 2021. The updated plan in currently under review and approval is expected Q2 of 2022.

There are historic environmental issues that may have the potential to impact JCG's ability to extract Mineral Reserves. These issues are being addressed through a working relationship with the NDEP. Below is a list of items and actions that may require some further spending:

JCG developed an environmental action plan to address each of the alleged air permit violations in 2021. The action plan consists of two phases. Phase I involves the analysis and development of remediation solutions, and Phase II includes the implementation of these solutions to address all alleged NOAV's. The remediation plan was jointly developed with expert third parties, JCG and the NDEP.

On August 26, 2021, the NDEP issued 10 Notices of Alleged Violation (collectively, the "2021 NOAV") that alleged the Company (doing business as JCG) had violated various air permit conditions and regulations applicable to operations at the Jerritt Canyon Mine. The 2021 NOAV's is related to compliance with emission monitoring, testing, recordkeeping requirements, and emission and throughput limits. The Company is working with the NPEP enforcement group to address all alleged violations.

The Company filed a Notice of Appeal on September 3, 2021, challenging the 2021 NOAV before the Nevada State Environmental Commission ("NSEC"). The Company raised various defenses to the 2021 NOAV, including that it was not liable for the violations because it was not the owner/operator of the Jerritt Canyon Mine during the period the alleged violations began (on April 30, 3021, the Company acquired Jerritt Canyon Canada Ltd, which, through subsidiaries, owns and operates the Jerritt Canyon Mine). There is currently no hearing scheduled or any scheduling order in the matter, and the parties have yet to engage in discovery.

On March 8, 2022, NDEP issued an additional four Notices of Alleged Violations (collectively, the "2022 NOAV") to JCG for alleged noncompliance of an Air Quality Operating permit and Mercury Operating Permit to Construct. The 2022 NOAV relate to alleged exceedances of a mercury emission limitations, exceedances of operating parameters, installation of equipment, and recordkeeping requirements. JCG filed a Request for Hearing with the NSEC on March 18, 2022, that challenged the bases for the alleged NOAVs, and any potential penalties associated with the NOAVs. As part of the filing, JCG waived its right to a hearing within 20 days of the NSEC's receipt of the Request for a Hearing.

At this time the estimated amount of any potential fine or penalty for the 2021 NOAV or the 2022 NOAV cannot be reliably determined.

In addition to the action plan to address the air permit NOAVs, JCG has developed an action plan to address all other environmental issues. This includes working in collaboration with the NDEP.

Sustaining capital costs were estimated by JCG, with the majority of the costs consisting of mine development and improvement in the plant's gas handling systems as part of compliance attainment. Sustaining and near-mine exploration capital costs for Jerritt Canyon are summarized in Table 27.

Operating costs estimated by JCG, averaging $179.2 million per year in the next three years or $179.00/tonne ore were estimated for mining, processing, and general and administrative expenses. Operating cost inputs such as labour rates, consumables, and supplies were based on JCG operating data. A summary of Jerritt Canyon operating costs is provided in Table 28.

This amount of drilling is expected to continue on an annual basis while production continues, with amounts required will be reviewed annually. In addition, an annual prospect generation program consisting of prospecting, soil and rock geochemical surveys, mapping, or geophysical surveys is being implemented.

The San Martín mine is an underground silver mine and processing facility in Jalisco State, México, approximately 250 km north of the state capital city of Guadalajara, and owned by the Company's wholly owned indirect subsidiary, Minera El Pilón, S.A. de C.V. The Company acquired San Martin in 2006 and operated it until July 2019 when it was placed on temporary suspension due to increased insecurity in the area and safety concerns for the Company's workforce. The surface infrastructure includes a 1,300 tpd cyanidation processing facility, temporary ore stockpiles, a tailings storage facility, water management and diversion structures, a drill core and logging shack, power substations, and power lines. There are also onsite support facilities for the operations, which are located near the plant and include the main administrative offices, warehouse, assay laboratory, maintenance buildings, cafeteria and other employee housing. Existing underground workshop facilities in the Rosario mine include a washing bay, a lube station, and several repair stations for mobile equipment.

Since its acquisition of the mine in 2006 First Majestic has completed 195,628 metres in 1,125 diamond drill‐holes. No mining, drilling or exploration was carried out in 2021. A buttressing program was started on tailings impoundment #2 as part of the company's stability and reclamation/closure program.

Table 29: Internal Mineral Resource Estimates for the San Martin Silver Mine.

The La Parrilla mine is an underground silver mine and processing facility located in Durango State, México, approximately 76 kilometres southeast of the capital city of Durango, and is owned by the Company's wholly owned indirect subsidiary, First Majestic Plata, S.A. de C.V. The Company acquired La Parrilla in 2004 and operated it until September 2, 2019, when mining operations were placed on temporary suspension. Exploration for new deposits continues with an emphasis on brownfield and greenfield targets within the property mineral concessions.

The La Parrilla mine also supports First Majestic's ISO certified Central Laboratory and metallurgical pilot plant testing facilities which continue in operation supporting the Company's metallurgical investigations and assay work for the Company's exploration samples.

The existing surface infrastructure includes a 2,000 tpd dual‐circuit processing facility consisting of a 1,000 tpd cyanidation circuit and a 1,000 tpd flotation circuit, repair workshops, an analytical laboratory (First Majestic's Central Laboratory), temporary ore stockpiles, a tailings storage facility, water management and diversion structures, offices, a drill core and logging shack, power substations and power lines. Existing underground workshop facilities include a washing bay, a lubricant station and several repair stations for mobile equipment.

Table 30: Internal Mineral Resource Estimates for the La Parrilla Silver Mine.

Del Toro mine is an underground silver mine and processing facility located in Zacatecas State, México, approximately 150 km northwest of the state capital city of Zacatecas, and is owned by the Company's wholly owned indirect subsidiary, First Majestic Del Toro S.A. de C.V. The Company operated the mine from 2004 until 21 January 2020 when mining operations were placed on temporary suspension.

Project generation exploration continues, with an emphasis on brownfield and greenfield targets within the property mineral concessions.

The existing surface mining infrastructure includes a 2,000 tpd flotation circuit and a 2,000 tpd cyanidation circuit which is currently in care and maintenance, workshops, analytical laboratory, temporary ore stockpiles, waste rock and tailings storage facilities, water management and diversion structures, offices, drill core and logging shack, water ponds, power substations and power lines. The Del Toro mine includes three main independent underground mining areas which are accessed via surface portals, the San Juan mine, the Dolores mine and the Perseverancia mine.

La Guitarra mine is an underground silver/gold mine and processing facility located in México State, México, approximately 130 kilometres southwest of México City, and is owned and operated by the Company's wholly owned indirect subsidiary, La Guitarra Compañia Minera S.A. de C.V. ("La Guitarra Compania"). The Company acquired the mine in 2012 and operated it until 2018 when it was put on care and maintenance. No mining or exploration is being carried out at this time.

The national power grid crosses the property within 700 metres of the existing plant. All current and projected production centres are near natural water sources. Proximity to the major industrial centres of Toluca and México City provides access to a large variety of suppliers. The infrastructure at the mine site consists of a processing facility with a conventional flotation mill rated at 500 tpd, an analytical laboratory, drill core storage facilities, a flotation plant and mill, offices, repair shops, and warehouses. Water is supplied from the mine workings, surface streams and the Temascaltepec River.

Since its acquisition in 2012 First Majestic has completed approximately 128,671 metres of drilling in 689 diamond

drill holes. There has been no drilling since mid‐2018. In 2020 the Company initiated a drilling campaign to analyse the tailing impoundment quality. In 2021 metallurgical testing was completed for this material at the company's main pilot plant test facilities at La Parrilla, the results indicate certain potential for reprocessing this material.

Table 32: Internal Mineral Resource Estimates for the La Guitarra Silver Mine.

Investment in securities of the Company should be considered speculative due to the high-risk nature of the Company's business and the present stage of the Company's development. The following risk factors, as well as risks currently unknown to the Company, could materially adversely affect the future business, operations and financial condition of the Company and could cause them to differ materially from the estimates described in forward-looking statements herein relating to the Company or the Company's business, property or financial results, each of which could cause investors to lose part or all of their investment in the Company's securities. The risks set out below are not the only risks the Company faces; risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company or that the Company currently deems to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Investors should carefully consider the following risk factors along with the other information set out in this AIF prior to making an investment in the Company. While First Majestic engages in certain risk management practices, there can be no assurance that such measures will limit the occurrence of events that may negatively impact the Company as many factors are beyond the control of the Company. In addition to the other information presented in this AIF, the risk factors that follow should be given special consideration when evaluating an investment in the Company's securities.

Global financial conditions and the global economy in general have at various times in the past and may in the future, experience extreme volatility in response to economic shocks or other events, such as the ongoing situation concerning COVID‐19. Many industries, including the mining industry, are impacted by volatile market conditions in response to the widespread outbreak of epidemics, pandemics or other health crises. Such public health crises and the responses of governments and private actors can result in disruptions and volatility in economies, financial markets and global supply chains as well as declining trade and market sentiment and reduced mobility of people, all of which could impact commodity prices, interest rates, credit ratings, credit risk and inflation.

The Company's business could be materially adversely affected by the effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic. As at the date of this AIF, the global reactions to the spread of COVID‐19 have led to, among other things, significant restrictions in many jurisdictions on travel and gatherings of individuals, quarantines, temporary business closures, disruptions in consumer activity and government stimulus packages. Although quarantines have been lifted in many jurisdictions and vaccination programs have been initiated, certain jurisdictions that have previously lifted quarantines have been required to re-impose them and vaccination programs may be implemented slower than expected or may not be as efficacious as expected due to a variety of factors including delays in distribution, vaccine refusal or the emergence of new strains which are resistant to vaccines. While these effects are expected to be temporary, the duration of the disruptions to business internationally and the related financial impact on the Company and the economy in general continues to be uncertain. In addition, the increasing number of individuals infected with COVID‐19 has resulted in a widespread global health crisis that has adversely affected global economies and financial markets and could result in a protracted economic downturn that could have an adverse effect on the demand for precious metals and the Company's future prospects.

In particular, the continued spread of COVID‐19 globally could materially and adversely impact the Company's business, including without limitation, employee health, workforce availability and productivity, limitations on travel, supply chain disruptions, increased insurance premiums, increased costs and reduced efficiencies, the availability of industry experts and personnel, restrictions on the Company's exploration and drilling programs and/or the timing to process drill and other metallurgical testing and the slowdown or temporary suspension of operations at some or all of the Company's properties, resulting in reduced production volumes. Although the Company has the capacity to continue certain administrative functions remotely, many other functions, including mining operations, cannot be conducted remotely.

As a result of the temporary closures of its Mexican facilities the Company experienced loss of production at its facilities during the second and third financial quarters of 2020. In early November 2020, the Company's three operating mines in Mexico had returned to normal operations. There is no guarantee that the Company will not experience significant disruptions to or additional closures of some or all of its active mining operations due to COVID-19 restrictions in the future. Any such disruptions or closures could have a material adverse effect on the Company's production, revenue, net income and business. In addition, parties with whom the Company does business or on whom the Company is reliant, including suppliers and refineries may also be adversely impacted by the COVID‐19 pandemic which may in turn cause further disruption to the Company's business, including delays or halts in availability or delivery of consumables and delays or halts in refining of ore from the Company's mines. The impact of COVID‐19 and government responses thereto may also continue to have an impact on financial markets and could constrain the Company's ability to obtain equity or debt financing in the future, which may have a material and adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Uncertainty in the Calculation of Mineral Reserves, Resources and Silver and Gold Recovery

There is a degree of uncertainty attributable to the calculation of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources. Until Mineral Reserves or Mineral Resources are actually mined, extracted and processed, the quantity of minerals and their grades must be considered estimates only. In addition, the quantity of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources may vary depending on, among other things, applicable metal prices. Any material change in the quantity of Mineral Reserves, Mineral Resources, grade or mining widths may affect the economic viability of some or all of the Company's mineral properties and may have a material adverse effect on the Company's operational results and financial condition. Mineral Reserves with respect to the Company's properties have been calculated on the basis of economic factors at the time of calculation; any subsequent variations in such factors may have an impact on the amount of the Company's Mineral Reserves. In addition, there can be no assurance that silver and gold recoveries or other metal recoveries in small scale laboratory tests will be duplicated in larger scale tests under on-site conditions or during production, or that the existing known and experienced recoveries will continue.

From time to time, the Company prepares estimates of future production and future production costs for operations. No assurance can be given that production and cost estimates will be achieved. These production and cost estimates are based on, among other things, the following factors: the accuracy of Mineral Reserve estimates; the accuracy of assumptions regarding ground conditions and physical characteristics of ores, such as hardness and presence or absence of particular metallurgical characteristics; equipment and mechanical availability; labour; and the accuracy of estimated rates and costs of mining and processing, including the cost of human and physical resources required to carry out the Company's activities. Failure to achieve production or cost estimates, or increases in costs, could have an adverse impact on the Company's future cash flows, earnings, results of operations and financial condition.

Actual production and costs may vary from estimates for a variety of reasons, including actual ore mined varying from estimates of grade, tonnage, dilution and metallurgical and other characteristics; short-term operating factors relating to the Mineral Reserves, such as the need for sequential development of ore bodies and the processing of new or different ore grades; and risks and hazards associated with mining described under "Operating Hazards and Risks" in this section of the AIF. In addition, there can be no assurance that silver recoveries or other metal recoveries in small scale laboratory tests will be duplicated in larger scale tests under on-site conditions or during production, or that the existing known and experienced recoveries will continue. Costs of production may also be affected by a variety of factors including: dilution, widths, ore grade and metallurgy, labour costs, costs of supplies and services (such as, for example, fuel and power), general inflationary pressures and currency exchange rates. Failure to achieve production estimates could have an adverse impact on the Company's future cash flows, earnings, results of operations and financial condition.

The Company has projects at various stages of development and there are inherent risks in the development, construction and permitting of all new mining projects. Exploration and development of mineral properties involves significant financial risks that even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. While the discovery of an ore body may result in substantial rewards, few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses may be required to establish economic reserves by drilling, constructing mining and processing facilities at a site, developing metallurgical processes and extracting precious metals from ore. The Company cannot ensure that its current exploration and development programs will result in profitable commercial mining operations. Also, substantial expenses may be incurred on exploration projects which are subsequently abandoned due to poor exploration results or the inability to define resources which can be developed and mined economically.

The economic feasibility of development projects is reliant upon many factors, including the accuracy of Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource estimates, metal recoveries, capital and operating costs, government regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing, exporting, environmental protection, and metal prices, which are highly volatile. Development projects are also subject to the successful completion of economic evaluations or feasibility studies, issuance of necessary governmental permits and availability of adequate financing. Furthermore, material changes in developing resources into economically viable Mineral Reserves can be affected by ore grades, widths and dilution or metal recoveries at any project.

Development projects have no operating history upon which to base estimates of future cash flow. Estimates of Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves, Measured Mineral Resources, Indicated Mineral Resources and Inferred Mineral Resources are, to a large extent, based upon detailed geological and engineering analysis. Further, Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Due to the uncertainty of Inferred Mineral Resources, there is no assurance that Inferred Mineral Resources will be upgraded to Proven or Probable Mineral Reserves as a result of continued exploration.

Because mines have limited lives based primarily on Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves, the Company must continually replace and expand its Mineral Reserves as the Company's mines produce metals. The ability of the Company to maintain or increase its annual production of metals and the Company's future growth and productivity will be dependent in significant part on its ability to identify and acquire additional commercially mineable mineral rights, to bring new mines into production and to continue to invest in exploration and development at the Company's existing mines or projects in order to develop resources into minable economic Mineral Reserves.

Failure to identify additional mineral reserves may result in reduction of mineral production at one or more of the Company's mines and may result in a mine ceasing to be economic and ultimately, may lead to temporary or permanent closure of the mine. Mine closure involves long-term management of permanent engineered structures and potential acid rock drainage, achievement of environmental closure standards, orderly termination of employees and contractors and ultimately relinquishment of the site. The successful completion of these and other associated tasks is dependent on sufficient financial resources and the ability to successfully implement negotiated agreements with relevant governmental authorities, communities, unions, employees and other stakeholders. The consequences of a difficult closure range from increased closure costs and handover delays to ongoing environmental impacts and corporate reputation damage if desired outcomes cannot be achieved. The Company has limited experience in managing mine closures and there is no assurance that any future mine closures will be successfully managed to the satisfaction of all stakeholders.

The operation and development of a mine or mineral property involves many risks which a combination of experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may not be able to overcome. These risks include:

• changes in the cost of consumables, power costs and potential power shortages;

• theft, fraud, organized crime, civil disobedience, protests and other security issues;

• natural phenomena, such as inclement or severe weather conditions, floods, droughts, rockslides and earthquakes.

These occurrences could result in environmental damage and liabilities, work stoppages and delayed production, increased production costs, damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or production facilities, personal injury or death, asset write-downs, monetary losses, liabilities to third parties and other liabilities.

Mining, processing, development and exploration activities depend, to one degree or another, on adequate infrastructure. Reliable roads, bridges, power sources, water supplies and, in certain cases, air access are important determinants for capital and operating costs. The lack of availability on acceptable terms or the delay in the availability of any one or more of these items could prevent or delay exploitation or development of the Company's projects and may require the Company to construct alternative infrastructure (for example, powerlines and other energy-related infrastructure). If adequate infrastructure is not available in a timely manner, there can be no assurance that the exploitation of the Company's projects will be commenced or completed on a timely basis, if at all; the resulting operations will achieve the anticipated production volume, or the construction costs and ongoing operating costs associated with the exploitation and/or development of the Company's mines and other projects will not be higher than anticipated. In addition, unusual weather phenomena, sabotage, terrorism, non-governmental organization ("NGO") and governmental or other community or indigenous interference in the maintenance or provision of such infrastructure could adversely affect the Company's business, operations and profitability.

While the Company believes that it has adequate infrastructure to support current operations, future developments could limit the availability of certain aspects of the infrastructure. The Company could be adversely affected by the need for new infrastructure. There can be no guarantee that the Company will be successful in maintaining adequate infrastructure for its operations which could adversely affect the Company's business, operations and profitability.

Future increases in metal prices may lead to renewed increases in demand for exploration, development and construction services and equipment used in mineral exploration and development activities. Such increases could result in delays if services or equipment cannot be obtained in a timely manner due to inadequate availability and may cause delays due to the need to coordinate the availability of services or equipment, any of which could materially decrease project exploration and development and/or increase production costs and limit profits.

Certain of the Company's mineral properties are accessed primarily through air travel, including airplane and helicopter. An airplane or helicopter incident resulting in loss of life, facility shutdown or regulatory action could result in liability to the Company. In addition, any such incident may result in reduced access or loss of access to a particular facility which the Company may or may not be able to mitigate by alternative air or ground-based travel methods. Accordingly, any such incident could have a material adverse effect on the operations of the Company.

The Company's mining, exploration and development projects are subject to extensive laws and regulations which vary based on the jurisdiction in which the projects are located. Such laws and regulations govern various matters which may include exploration, development, production, price controls, exports, taxes, mining royalties, environmental levies, labor standards, expropriation of property, maintenance of mining claims, land use, land claims of local people, water use, waste disposal, power generation, protection and remediation of the environment, reclamation, historic and cultural resource preservation, mine safety, occupational health, and the management and use of toxic substances and explosives, including handling, storage and transportation of hazardous substances.

Such laws and regulations may require the Company to obtain licenses and permits from various governmental authorities. Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, including licensing and permitting requirements, may result in civil or criminal fines, penalties or enforcement actions, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities enjoining or curtailing operations, requiring corrective measures, requiring the installation of additional equipment, requiring remedial actions or imposing additional local or foreign parties as joint venture partners, any of which could result in significant expenditures or loss of income by the Company. The Company may also be required to compensate private parties suffering loss or damage by reason of a breach of such laws, regulations, licensing requirements or permitting requirements.

The Company's income and its mining, exploration and development projects, could be adversely affected by amendments to such laws and regulations, by future laws and regulations, by more stringent enforcement of current laws and regulations, by changes in applicable government policies affecting investment, mining and repatriation of financial assets, by shifts in political attitudes and by exchange controls. The effect, if any, of these factors cannot be accurately predicted. Further, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain or maintain all necessary licenses and permits that may be required to carry out exploration, development and mining operations at the Company's projects.

The costs of discovering, evaluating, planning, designing, developing, constructing, operating and closing the Company's mining, exploration and development activities and operations in compliance with such laws and regulations are significant. It is possible that the costs and delays associated with compliance with such laws and regulations, and new taxes, could become such that the Company would not proceed with mining, exploration and development at one or more of its properties. Moreover, it is possible that future regulatory developments, such as increasingly strict environmental protection laws, regulations and enforcement policies thereunder, and claims for damages to property and persons resulting from the Company's mining, exploration and development projects could result in substantial costs and liabilities for the Company, such that the Company would halt or not proceed with mining, exploration and development at one or more of its properties.

New tariffs and evolving trade policy between the United States and other countries, including China, México and Canada, may have an adverse effect on the Company's business and results of operations. There is currently significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United States and various other countries, including China, México and Canada, with respect to trade policies, treaties, government regulations and tariffs. Any increased restrictions on international trade or significant increases in tariffs on goods could potentially disrupt the Company's existing supply chains and impose additional costs on the Company's business.

NAFTA is an agreement signed in 1994 by Canada, México and the United States creating a trilateral trade bloc in North America. On November 30, 2018, the three countries entered into a new trade agreement (variously referred to as USMCA or United States- México -Canada Agreement) to replace NAFTA, and such agreement has now been ratified by all three countries. Among other things, USMCA requires its member countries to respect international labour standards including rights to free association and collective bargaining and to uphold their labour laws. Although management has determined that there have been no material effects to date on its operations regarding these developments, management cannot predict future potentially adverse developments in the political climate involving Canada, the United States and México and thus these may have an adverse and material impact in the future on the Company's operations and financial performance.

Partially due to the new labour standards in USMCA, the Mexican government instituted new outsourcing legislation in 2021 which impacted the labour relationship between operating mines and the service companies which provide labour to those operating mines, as well as the requirement to increase mandatory profit distributions from the operating mines. As a result, the Company has reorganized its corporate structure in Mexico to eliminate service companies from its structure for those subsidiaries that do not qualify under the new rules as specialized services entities.

In addition, Mexico's Congress is currently debating a proposed amendment to the Mexican Constitution to allow the state to increase control over the country's energy market. The bill would grant the state electricity company - Comisión Federal de Electricidad - 54 percent of the power output market and control over the terms and conditions of private energy producing companies. Approval of the bill requires support from two-thirds of both the higher and lower legislative chambers. Since the ruling party, MORENA, does not have currently have a supermajority in either, it is uncertain whether the bill has the necessary support to pass. For this reason, the financial impact on the Company of this proposed amendment to the Mexican Constitution cannot currently be estimated.

In addition, a number of countries, including Canada, the United States and México, have imposed travel restrictions or closed their borders to foreign nationals at various times during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although, as of the date hereof, neither Canada nor México have imposed restrictions on goods, there can be no guarantee that such restrictions on human mobility will not have an impact on the delivery of products from the Company's mines. Any such restrictions may have a material adverse impact on the Company's operations, income and financial performance.

The Company's operations are subject to extensive laws and regulations governing environmental protection promulgated by governments and government agencies. Environmental regulation provides for restrictions on, and the prohibition of, spills and the release and emission of various substances related to mining industry operations which could result in environmental pollution.

Environmental laws and regulations are complex and have become more stringent over time. The Company is required to obtain governmental permits and in some instances air, water quality, waste disposal, hazardous substances and mine reclamation permits. Although the Company makes provisions for environmental compliance and reclamation costs, it cannot be assured that these provisions will be adequate to discharge the Company's future obligations for these costs. Failure to comply with applicable environmental laws may result in injunctions, damages, suspension or revocation of permits and imposition of penalties. Environmental regulation is evolving in a manner resulting in stricter standards and the costs of compliance with such standards are increasing while the enforcement of, and fines and penalties for, non-compliance are also becoming more stringent. In addition, certain types of operations require submissions of, and approval of, environmental impact assessments. Environmental assessments of proposed projects carry a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and directors, officers and employees.

Climate change regulations may become more onerous over time as governments implement policies to further reduce carbon emissions, including the implementation of taxation regimes based on aggregate carbon emissions. Some of the costs associated with reducing emissions can be offset by increased energy efficiency and technological innovation. However, the cost of compliance with environmental regulation and changes in environmental regulation have the potential to result in increased cost of operations, reducing the profitability of the Company's operations.

There has been increased global attention and the introduction of regulations restricting or prohibiting the use of cyanide and other hazardous substances in mineral processing activities. If legislation restricting or prohibiting the use of cyanide were to be adopted in a region in which the Company relies on the use of cyanide, it would have a significant adverse impact on the Company's results of operations and financial condition as there are few, if any, substitutes for cyanide in extracting metals from certain types of ore.

On August 26, 2021, the NDEP issued the 2021 NOAV that alleged the Company (doing business as JCG) had violated various air permit conditions and regulations applicable to operations at the Jerritt Canyon Mine. The 2021 NOAV are related to compliance with emission monitoring, testing, recordkeeping requirements, and emission and throughput limits. The Company filed a Notice of Appeal on September 3, 2021, challenging the 2021 NOAV before the NSEC. The Company raised various defenses to the 2021 NOAV, including that it was not liable for the violations because it was not the owner/operator of the Jerritt Canyon Mine during the period the alleged violations began (on April 30, 2021, the Company acquired Jerritt Canyon Canada Ltd, which, through subsidiaries, owns and operates the Jerritt Canyon Mine). There is currently no hearing scheduled or any scheduling order in the matter, and the parties have yet to engage in discovery.

On March 8, 2022, NDEP issued the 2022 NOAV to JCG for alleged noncompliance of an Air Quality Operating permit and Mercury Operating Permit to Construct. The 2022 NOAV relate to alleged exceedances of a mercury emission limitations, exceedances of operating parameters, installation of equipment, and recordkeeping requirements. JCG filed a Request for Hearing with the NSEC on March 18, 2022, that challenged the bases for the alleged NOAVs, and any potential penalties associated with the NOAVs. As part of the filing, JCG waived its right to a hearing within 20 days of the NSEC's receipt of the Request for a Hearing.

At this time the estimated amount of any potential fine or penalty for the 2021 NOAV or the 2022 NOAV cannot be reliably determined.

The Company intends to, and attempts to, fully comply with all applicable environmental regulations, including regulations concerning COVID-19. While responsible environmental stewardship is a top priority for the Company, there can be no assurance that the Company has been or will be at all times in complete compliance with such laws, regulations and permits, or that the costs of complying with current and future environmental laws and permits will not materially and adversely affect the Company's business, results of operations or financial condition.

Workers involved in mining operations are subject to many inherent health and safety risks and hazards, including, but not limited to, contraction of COVID-19, rock bursts, cave-ins, floods, falls of ground, tailings dam failures, chemical hazards, mineral dust and gases, use of explosives, noise, electricity and moving equipment (especially heavy equipment) and slips and falls, which could result in occupational illness or health issues, personal injury, and loss of life, and/or facility and workforce evacuation. These risks cannot be eliminated completely and are controlled through the Company's safety management systems, and may adversely affect the Company's reputation, business and future operations.

In order to manage the risk in the operation of mining tailings storage facilities ("TSF"), the Company invests in technologies and practices that safely facilitate the handling and storage of mine tailings, in particular the operation of press filters and belt filters in Mexico, and automated pump-back and monitoring systems in Nevada at the Company's Jerritt Canyon Gold Mine. Tailing filter presses are also installed at the Company's four suspended mines at La Guitarra, La Parrilla, Del Toro and San Martin. All of the Company's operating tailing storage facilities in Mexico are "dry stack" tailing storage facilities and monitored continuously and audited annually to meet all federal and state safety guidelines. The Jerritt Canyon Gold Mine tailing storage facility is a wet deposition facility, and the Company recently completed a lined, 12 ft. lift to insure additional storage for another 2+ years of operation. A life-of-mine tailing deposition optimization study was completed in 2021 by Patterson & Cooke and is under evaluation.

At San Martin the Company has increased the rock supporting abutment to TSF2 to further increase this TSF's factor of safety to international standards and is 98% complete with this project.

The Company complies with applicable regulations, which establish the procedure to characterize tailings deposits, as well as the specifications and criteria for the characterization and preparation of the deposit sites, construction, operation and closure of tailings deposits. During construction of the Company's paste TSF, the American Society for Testing and Materials standards are being applied. In addition, the designs and operation of the Company TSFs are guided by international standards such as the Canadian Dam Association ("CDA"), where the minimum required operational stability factors are established. The designs and current stability conditions have also been reviewed by third party consultants through the Dam Safety Inspection reports, carrying out the risk analysis and classification according to international standards of both the CDA and the International Commission on Large Dams.

Mining is an extractive industry that deals with inherent uncertainties of natural and environmental factors; therefore, the Company may be exposed to liability if accidents and/or contamination arise as a result of any failure in its TSFs. Such failures could result from various risks and hazards, including natural hazards like earthquakes and flooding, uncertainty in the behaviour of rock formations beneath the TSF foundations, industrial accidents and involuntary failures in the design and management of the TSF.

To the extent that the Company is subject to unfunded or uninsured environmental liabilities, the payment for such liabilities would reduce funds otherwise available and could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Should the Company be unable to fund fully the cost of remedying an environmental problem, the Company may be required to suspend operations or enter into interim compliance measures pending completion of required remediation, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The validity of mining or exploration titles or claims or rights, which constitute most of the Company's property holdings, can be uncertain and may be contested. The Company has used reasonable commercial efforts to investigate the Company's title or claim to its various properties, however, no assurance can be given that applicable governments will not revoke or significantly alter the conditions of the applicable exploration and mining titles or claims and that such exploration and mining titles or claims will not be challenged or impugned by third parties. Mining laws are continually developing and changes in such laws could materially impact the Company's rights to its various properties or interests therein.

Although the Company has obtained title opinions for certain material properties, there is no guarantee that title to such properties will not be challenged or impugned. The Company has obtained title insurance for its Jerritt Canyon Mine but there is a risk that such insurance could be insufficient, or the Company could not be successful in any claim again its insurer. Accordingly, the Company may have little or no recourse as a result of any successful challenge to title to any of its properties. The Company's properties may be subject to prior unregistered liens, agreements or transfers, land claims or undetected title defects which may have a material adverse effect on the Company's ability to develop or exploit the properties.

In México, legal rights applicable to mining concessions are different and separate from legal rights applicable to surface lands (as set out below under the heading "Local Groups and Civil Disobedience"); accordingly, title holders of mining concessions must obtain agreement from surface landowners to obtain suitable access to mining concessions and for the amount of compensation in respect of mining activities conducted on such land. If the Company is unable to agree to terms of access with the holder of surface rights with respect to a particular claim, the Company may be able to gain access through a regulatory process in México, however there is no guarantee that such process will be successful or timely or that the terms of such access will be favorable to the Company. In any such event, access to the Company's properties may be curtailed, which may result in reductions in production and corresponding reductions in revenue. Any such reductions could have a material adverse effect on the Company, its business and its results of operations.

In Mexico, an Ejido is a form of communal ownership of land recognized by Mexican federal laws. Following the Mexican Revolution, beginning in 1934 as an important component of agrarian land reform, the Ejido system was introduced to distribute parcels of land to groups of farmers known as Ejidos. While mineral rights are administered by the federal government through federally issued mining concessions, in many cases, an Ejido may control surface rights over communal property. An Ejido may sell or lease lands directly to a private entity, it also may allow individual members of the Ejido to obtain title to specific parcels of land and thus the right to rent, distribute, or sell the land. While the Company has agreements with the Ejidos that may impact the Company's properties, some of these agreements may be subject to renegotiation from time to time. Changes to the existing agreements may have a significant impact on operations at the Company's mines.

If the Company is not able to reach an agreement for the use of the lands with the Ejido, the Company may be required to modify its operations or plans for the development of its mines. In the event that the Company conducts activities in areas where no agreements exist with owners which are Ejidos, the Company may face legal action from the Ejido.

1,254 hectares of land included in the San Dimas Mine and for which the Company holds legal title are subject to legal proceedings commenced in 2008 by the Ejido Guarisamey asserting title to the property. These proceedings do not name the Company or the Company's subsidiaries as a party and the Company therefore had no standing to participate in them. The defendants were prior owners of the land who were not provided notice of the lawsuit. This resulted in a default judgment which the Company is seeking to nullify through the commencement of a claim of fraudulent proceedings, which proceedings remain in the initial stages.

An additional administrative procedure was initiated before the federal government by the Ejido San Dimas requesting the purchase of land which is the subject of the Guamuchil Suit for designation as "National Land". The Company has submitted evidence of ownership which we believe invalidates the Ejido San Dimas request. Conclusion of this procedure remains outstanding.

If the Company is not successful in these challenges, the San Dimas Mine could face higher costs associated with agreed or mandated payments that would be payable to the Ejidos for use of the properties.

In April 2021, the Company was advised that proceedings involving the Ejido Guamuchil in the Superior Court of the Durango State, Mexico were resolved in favour of the Company. Certain properties included in the San Dimas Mine and for which the Company holds legal title were subject to legal proceedings commenced by the Ejido Guamuchil asserting title to the property. In 2015, the Company obtained a federal injunction (known as an amparo) against the Ejido Guamuchil. The Guamuchil suit was then reinstated the same year resulting in the Company's subsidiaries gaining standing rights as an affected third party permitted to submit evidence of the Company's legal title. In February 2017, the Company received a favourable decision which was confirmed on appeal. That decision was further appealed by the Ejido Guamuchil and the appeal was dismissed in April 2021 and the Company's full ownership of the land has been confirmed.

The Company's operations have in the past and may in the future be subject to protest, roadblocks, or other forms of civil disobedience or public expressions against its activities, including action by employees.There can be no assurance that there will not be further disruptions to workforce availability or site access at any of our projects in the future, which could negatively impact production from the projects and, ultimately, the long-term viability of the projects, any of which may have a material adverse impact on our operations.

The Company's relationships with communities near where the Company operates are critical to ensure the future success of existing operations and the construction and development of future projects. There is an increasing level of public interest worldwide relating to the perceived effect of mining activities on the environment and on communities impacted by such activities. Certain NGOs, some of which oppose globalization and resource development, are often vocal critics and attempt to interfere with the mining industry and its practices, including the use of cyanide and other hazardous substances in processing activities. Adverse publicity generated by such NGOs or others related to extractive industries generally, or their operations specifically, could have an adverse effect on the Company's reputation or financial condition and may impact the Company's relationship with the communities in which it operates. While the Company believes that it operates in a socially responsible manner, there is no guarantee that the Company's efforts in this respect will mitigate this potential material risk.

The Company currently conducts ts mining operations in México and the US, and as such the Company's operations are exposed to various levels of political and economic risks by factors outside of the Company's control. These potential factors include but are not limited to: mining royalty and various tax increases or claims by governmental bodies, expropriation or nationalization, foreign exchange controls, high rates of inflation, extreme fluctuations in currency exchange rates, import and export regulations, cancellation or renegotiation of contracts, environmental and permitting regulations, illegal mining operations by third parties on the Company's properties, labor unrest and surface access issues. The Company currently has no political risk insurance coverage against these risks.

The Company is unable to determine the potential impact of these risks on its future financial position or results of operations. Changes, if any, in mining or investment policies or shifts in political attitude in México or the US may substantively affect the Company's exploration, development and production activities.

Certain areas of México have experienced outbreaks of localized violence, thefts, kidnappings and extortion associated with drug cartels and other criminal organizations in various regions. Any increase in the level of violence, or a concentration of violence in areas where the projects and properties of the Company are located, could have an adverse effect on the results and the financial condition of the Company. In July 2019, the Company announced the temporary suspension of all mining and processing activities at the San Martin operation due to a growing level of insecurity in the area and safety concerns for the Company's workforce. The Company is working with authorities to attempt to secure the area, although it is not known when that might if ever occur.

The Company has in the past experienced several incidents of significant theft of products and other incidents of criminal activity have occasionally affected the Company's employees. The Company maintains extensive security at each of its operating facilities and has implemented detailed and timely assaying protocols and enhanced security procedures in an effort to reduce the probability of such events in the future, however, there can be no guarantee that such protocols and procedures will be effective at preventing future occurrences of theft or other criminal activity. If similar events occur in the future, there could be a significant impact on the Company's sale of silver and on its gross and net revenues. Previous losses due to theft have in large part been recovered under the Company's insurance policies, however, any such losses in the future may not be mitigated completely or at all by the Company's insurance policies. Produced metals that are subject to a streaming agreement may still be subject to payment under the agreement where such metals have been stolen, whether or not the resulting losses are covered by insurance.

A number of governments have introduced or are moving to introduce climate change legislation and treaties at the international, national, state/provincial and local levels. Regulation relating to emission levels (such as carbon taxes) and energy efficiency is becoming more stringent. If the current regulatory trend continues, this may result in increased costs at some or all of the Company's operations. In addition, the physical risks of climate change may also have an adverse effect on the Company's operations. These risks include the following:

There can be no assurance that efforts to mitigate the risks of climate changes will be effective and that the physical risks of climate change will not have an adverse effect on the Company's operations and profitability.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company reassessed its reclamation obligation at each material mine based on updated LOM estimates, rehabilitation, and closure plans. The total discounted amount of estimated cash flows required to settle the Company's estimated obligations is $153.6 million, which has been discounted using a risk-free rate ranging from 7.4% to 7.5% for the mines in Mexico and 1.5% to 1.6% for the Jerritt Canyon Gold Mine. The estimated decommissioning and reclamation obligations breakdown primarily consists of $100.4 million for the reclamation obligation of the Jerritt Canyon Gold Mine, including $17.6 million related to the Environmental Trust that will be required to be funded no later than October 31, 2022; $15.5 million for the San Dimas Silver/Gold Mine; $11.0 million for the La Encantada Silver Mine; $8.4 million for the Santa Elena Silver/Gold Mine; $6.7 million for the San Martin Silver Mine; $4.4 million for the La Parrilla Silver Mine; $4.0 million for the Del Toro Silver Mine and $2.6 million for the La Guitarra Silver Mine. The present value of the reclamation liabilities may be subject to change based on management's current and future estimates, changes in the remediation technology or changes to applicable laws and regulations. Such changes will be recorded in our accounts as they occur.

The costs of performing the decommissioning and reclamation must be funded by the Company's operations. These costs can be significant and are subject to change. The Company cannot predict what level of decommissioning and reclamation may be required in the future by regulators. If the Company is required to comply with significant additional regulations or if the actual cost of future decommissioning and reclamation is significantly higher than current estimates, this could have an adverse impact on the Company's future cash flows, earnings, results of operations and financial condition.

Recruiting and retaining qualified personnel is critical to the Company's success. The number of persons skilled in mining, exploration, development and finance of mining properties is limited and competition for such persons can be intense. As the Company's business activity grows, the Company will require additional key operational, financial, administrative and mining personnel. Although the Company believes it will be successful in attracting, training and retaining qualified personnel, there can be no assurance of such successes. If the Company is not successful in attracting and training and in retaining qualified personnel, the efficiency of the Company's operations could be affected, which could have an adverse impact on the Company's future cash flows, earnings, results of operations and financial condition. Although the Company has the capacity to continue certain administrative functions remotely, temporary or permanent unavailability of key personnel (including due to contraction of COVID-19 or as a result of mobility restrictions imposed by governments and private actors to combat the spread of COVID-19) may have an adverse impact on the Company's business.

The Company's ability to achieve its future goals and objectives is dependent, in part, on maintaining positive relations with its employees and minimizing employee turnover. In certain of the Company's operations employees in México are represented by unions and the Company has experienced labor strikes and work stoppages in the past, which were resolved in a relatively short period. However, in some instances, labor strikes and work stoppages may take longer to resolve. Such work stoppages may have a material adverse effect on production from the affected mines and on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition. There can be no assurance that the Company will not experience future labor strikes or work stoppages or that, if it does, that such labor strikes or work stoppages will be resolved speedily. Union agreements are periodically renegotiated and there can be no assurance that any future union contracts will be on terms favorable to the Company. Any labor strikes, work stoppages or adverse changes in such legislation or in the relationship between the Company and its employees may have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition.

Although none of the employees at the Jerritt Canyon Mine are currently represented by a union there can be no guarantee that such employees will not unionize in the future and that there will not be work stoppages or other labour unrest at such mine. In the event that some or all of the employees at the Jerritt Canyon Mine unionize in the future then we may be subject to higher labour costs at such operation which may have a material impact on the Company's cash flow and results of operations.

In addition, relations between the Company and its employees may be impacted by changes to labour legislation in México which may be introduced by the relevant governmental authorities. For example, Mexican labour law requires that all collective bargaining agreements which predate 2019 legislative reform are required to be legitimized by workers before 2023. Failure by the unions representing the Company's employees to do so by 2023 could lead to action by government authorities against the Company or to claims under USMCA.

The Company has established and maintains employment policies which are intended to inform and govern the relationship between the Company, its management and its employees. These policies, which include the Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Policy, the Code of Ethical Conduct and Whistleblower Policy provide guidance and best practices with respect to workplace health and safety, harassment, anti-discrimination and other relevant matters. The Company believes that its current policies are appropriate and that its management and employees are acting in compliance with such policies, however breaches of these policies may result in the Company being held liable for the actions of its management or employees.

The mining industry is highly competitive in all its phases. The Company competes with a number of companies which are more mature or in later stages of production and may be better positioned to attract talent, equipment and materials. These companies may possess greater financial resources, more significant investments in capital equipment and mining infrastructure for the ongoing development, exploration and acquisition of mineral interests, as well as for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees and mining contractors. The Company may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors, and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations.

As part of the Company's business strategy, it has sought and expects to continue to seek new exploration, mining and development opportunities with a focus on silver and gold. As a result, the Company may from time to time acquire additional mineral properties or securities of issuers which hold mineral properties, such as its recent acquisition of the Jerritt Canyon Mine. In pursuit of such opportunities, the Company may fail to select appropriate acquisitions or negotiate acceptable arrangements, including arrangements to finance acquisitions or integrate the acquired businesses and their personnel into the Company's operations, and such acquired businesses may be subject to unanticipated liabilities. Prior to any acquisition, extensive due diligence of the proposed acquisition is completed. The ability to realize the benefits of an acquisition will depend in part on successfully consolidating functions and integrating operations, procedures and personnel in a timely and efficient manner, as well as on the Company's ability to realize the anticipated growth opportunities and synergies, efficiencies and cost savings from integrating our business and the acquired business following completion of the acquisition. This integration will require the dedication of substantial management effort, time and resources which may divert management's focus and resources from other strategic opportunities following completion of the acquisition and from operational matters during this process.

The Company cannot assure that it can complete any acquisition or business arrangement that it pursues, or is pursuing, on favourable terms, or that any acquisitions or business arrangements completed will ultimately benefit the Company. Future acquisitions by the Company may be completed through the issuance of debt or equity, and in the case of equity, the interests of shareholders in the net assets of the Company may be diluted. the interests of shareholders in the net assets of the Company may be diluted.

Certain directors of the Company are also directors, officers or shareholders of other companies that are similarly engaged in the business of acquiring, developing and exploiting natural resource properties. Such associations may give rise to conflicts of interest from time to time. In addition, Keith Neumeyer, the Company's Chief Executive Officer, is a director of First Mining and accordingly may be considered to have a conflict of interest with respect to First Mining and the Springpole Stream Agreement. The directors of the Company are required by law and the Company's policies to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company and those of the Company's stakeholders and to disclose any interest which they may have in any project or opportunity of the Company. If a conflict of interest arises, any director in a conflict is required to disclose his or her interest and abstain from voting on such matter. In determining whether or not the Company will participate in any project or opportunity, the directors will primarily consider the degree of risk to which the Company may be exposed and the Company's financial position at that time. All employees, including officers, are required to disclose any conflicts of interest pursuant to the Company's Code of Ethical Conduct. Such conflicts of the Company's directors and officers may result in a material and adverse effect on the Company's profitability, results of operation and financial condition. As a result of these conflicts of interest, the Company may miss the opportunity to participate in certain transactions, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position.

The Company is subject to various claims and legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of business activities. Each of these matters is subject to various uncertainties and it is possible that some of these other matters may be resolved in a manner that is unfavourable to the Company which may result in a material adverse impact on the Company's financial performance, cash flow or results of operations. First Majestic carries liability insurance coverage and establishes provisions for matters that are probable and can be reasonably estimated, however there can be no guarantee that the amount of such coverage is sufficient to protect against all potential liabilities. See "Insurance Risk" below. In addition, the Company may in the future be subjected to regulatory investigations or other proceedings, and may be involved in disputes with other parties, which may result in a significant impact on its financial condition, cash flow and results of operations.

The Company is organized under the laws of, and headquartered in, British Columbia, Canada. In addition, the majority of the Company's assets are located outside of Canada and the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for an investor to enforce judgments against the Company and its directors and officers obtained in United States courts or Canadian courts in courts outside of the United States and Canada based upon the civil liability provisions of United States federal securities laws or applicable Canadian securities laws or bring an original action against the Company and its directors and officers to enforce liabilities based upon such United States or Canadian securities laws in courts outside of the United States and Canada.

The Company's operations are governed by, and involve interactions with, many levels of government in numerous countries. The Company is required to comply with anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws, including the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act (Canada) and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (Canada) and similar laws in the other jurisdictions in which it operates or maintains a public listing. In recent years, there has been a general increase in both the frequency of enforcement and the severity of penalties under such laws, resulting in greater scrutiny and punishment to companies convicted of violating anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws. Furthermore, a company may be found liable for violations by not only its employees, but also by its contractors and third-party agents. The Company's internal procedures and programs may not always be effective in ensuring that it, its employees, contractors or third-party agents will comply strictly with all such applicable laws. All employees, directors and contractors are subject to the Company's Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy. Annual training on the policy is provided to all supervisory employees. If the Company becomes subject to an enforcement action or is found to be in violation of such laws, this may have a material adverse effect on the Company's reputation, result in significant penalties, fines and/or sanctions, and/or have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations.

The Company is subject to the Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act (Canada) ("ESTMA") which requires public disclosure of certain payments to governments by companies engaged in the commercial development of oil, gas and minerals who are either publicly listed in Canada or with business or assets in Canada. Mandatory annual reporting is required for extractive companies with respect to payments made to foreign and domestic governments at all levels, including entities established by two or more governments, and including Aboriginal groups. ESTMA requires reporting on the payments of any taxes, royalties, fees, production entitlements, bonuses, dividends, infrastructure reporting or structuring payments to avoid reporting may result in fines. The Company is currently up to date on its filings under ESTMA. If the Company becomes subject to an enforcement action or in violation of ESTMA, this may result in significant penalties, fines and/or sanctions which may also have a material adverse effect on the Company's reputation.

Cyber threats have evolved in severity, frequency and sophistication in recent years, and target entities are no longer primarily from the financial or retail sectors. Individuals engaging in cybercrime may target corruption of systems or data, or theft of sensitive data. The Company's mines and mills are for the most part automated and networked such that a cyber‐incident involving the Company's information systems and related infrastructure could negatively impact its operations. A corruption of the Company's financial or operational data or an operational disruption of its production infrastructure could, among other potential impacts, result in: (i) loss of production or accidental discharge; (ii) expensive remediation efforts; (iii) distraction of management; (iv) damage to the Company's reputation or its relationship with suppliers and/or counterparties; or (v) in events of noncompliance, which events could lead to regulatory fines or penalties. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition.

While the Company invests in robust security systems to detect and block inappropriate or illegal access to its key systems and works diligently to ensure data and system integrity, there can be no assurance that a critical system is not inadvertently or intentionally breached and compromised. This may result in business interruption losses, equipment damage, or loss of critical or sensitive information.

The Company's revenue is primarily dependent on the sale of silver and gold and movements in the spot price of silver or gold may have a direct and immediate impact on the Company's income and the value of related financial instruments. The Company's sales are directly dependent on commodity prices. Metal prices have historically fluctuated widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond the Company's control including international economic and political trends, including the ongoing hostilities in Ukraine, expectations for inflation, currency exchange rate fluctuations, interest rates, global and regional supply and demand, consumption patterns, speculative market activities, worldwide production and inventory levels, and sales programs by central banks. Mineral reserves on the Company's properties have been estimated on the basis of economic factors at the time of estimation; variations in such factors may have an impact on the amount of the Company's mineral reserves and future price declines could cause any future development of, and commercial production from, the Company's properties to be uneconomic. Depending on metal prices, projected cash flow from planned mining operations may not be sufficient and the Company could be forced to discontinue operations or development at some of its properties or may be forced to sell some of its properties. Future production from the Company's mining properties is dependent on metal prices that are adequate to make these properties economic.

100

Furthermore, Mineral Reserve estimations and Life of Mine ("LOM") plans using significantly lower metal prices could result in material write-downs of the Company's investment in mineral properties and increased depreciation, depletion, amortization, reclamation, and closure charges.

In addition to adversely affecting the Company's possible future reserve estimates and its financial condition, declining metal prices may impact operations by requiring a reassessment of the feasibility of a particular project. Even if the project is ultimately determined to be economically viable, the need to conduct such a reassessment may cause substantial delays or may interrupt operations until the reassessment can be completed.

Occasionally, the Company may hold silver in inventory due to market conditions, in anticipation of higher prices which may expose it to pricing risk.

The Company's cost of operations and profitability are also affected by the market prices of commodities that are consumed or otherwise used in connection with the Company's operations, such as LNG, diesel fuel, electricity, cyanide, explosives and other reagents and chemicals, steel and cement. Prices of such consumable commodities may be subject to volatile price movements over short periods of time and are affected by factors that are beyond the Company's control, such as changes in legislation and the ongoing hostilities in Ukraine and sanctions imposed by many nations on Russia and Belarus. Increases in the prices for such commodities could materially adversely affect the Company's results of operations and financial condition.

Global financial markets are experiencing extreme volatility as a result of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing hostilities in Ukraine and sanctions imposed by nations on Russia and Belarus. Events in global financial markets, and the volatility of global financial conditions, will continue to have an impact on the global economy. Many industries, including the mining sector, are impacted by market conditions. Some of the key impacts of financial market turmoil include devaluations and high volatility in global equity, commodity, foreign exchange and precious metal markets and a lack of market liquidity. Financial institutions and large corporations may be forced into bankruptcy or need to be rescued by government authorities. Access to financing may also be negatively impacted by future liquidity crises throughout the world. These factors may impact the Company's ability to obtain equity or debt financing and, where available, to obtain such financing on terms favorable to the Company.

Increased levels of volatility and market turmoil could have an adverse impact on the Company's operations and planned growth and the trading price of the securities of the Company may be adversely affected.

101

The Company carries on its primary mining operations activities outside of Canada, and the functional and reporting currency is US dollars. Accordingly, it is subject to the risks associated with fluctuation of the rate of exchange of other foreign currencies, in particular the Mexican Peso ("MXN"), the currency in which the majority of the Company's material and labour costs are paid and the Canadian dollar ("CAD") in which some of the Company's treasury is held and in which some of its costs are paid. Financial instruments and other monetary items that impact the Company's net earnings or other comprehensive income due to currency fluctuations include: MXN or CAD denominated cash and cash equivalents, short term and long-term restricted cash, short term investments, accounts receivable and value added taxes ("VAT") receivable, other financial assets, accounts payable, current and non-current income taxes payable, decommissioning liabilities and other liabilities. Such currency fluctuations may materially affect the Company's financial position and results of operations.

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to assessment by taxation authorities in various jurisdictions. Income tax provisions and income tax filing positions require estimates and interpretations of income tax rules and regulations of the various jurisdictions in which the Company and its subsidiaries operate and judgments as to their interpretation and application to the specific situation. The Company's business and operations and the business and operations of its subsidiaries is complex, and the Company has, historically, undertaken a number of significant financings, acquisitions and other material transactions.

In assessing the probability of realizing income tax assets recognized, the Company makes estimates related to expectations of future taxable income, applicable tax planning opportunities, expected timing of reversals of existing temporary differences and the likelihood that tax positions taken will be sustained upon examination by applicable tax authorities. In making its assessments, the Company gives additional weight to positive and negative evidence that can be objectively verified. Estimates of future taxable income are based on forecasted cash flows from operations and the application of existing tax laws in each jurisdiction. While management believes that the Company's provision for income tax is appropriate and in accordance with IFRS and applicable legislation and regulations, tax filing positions are subject to review and adjustment by taxation authorities who may challenge the Company's interpretation of the applicable tax legislation and regulations. Examination by applicable tax authorities is supported based on individual facts and circumstances of the relevant tax position examined in light of all available evidence. Any review or adjustment may result in the Company or its subsidiaries incurring additional tax liabilities. Any such liabilities may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition.

The introduction of new tax laws, tax reforms, regulations or rules, or changes to, or differing interpretation of, or application of, existing tax laws, regulations or rules in Canada, the USA, México, Barbados, or Switzerland or any other countries in which the Company's subsidiaries may be located, or to which shipments of products are made, could result in an increase in the Company's taxes payable, or other governmental charges, interest and penalties, duties or impositions. No assurance can be given that new tax laws, tax reforms, regulations or rules will not be enacted or that existing tax laws, regulations or rules will not be changed, interpreted or applied in a manner which could result in the Company's profits being subject to additional taxation, interest and penalties, or which could otherwise have a material adverse effect on the Company.

102

The Mexican tax authority (the "SAT") initiated a proceeding seeking to nullify the Advance Pricing Agreement (the "APA") with respect to the San Dimas Mine in 2012 which it had previously issued to Primero Mining Corp. ("Primero"), the owner of the San Dimas Mine prior to the Company's acquisition of Primero in 2018. The APA had confirmed Primero's basis for paying taxes on the price Primero realized for silver sales between 2010 and 2014. If the SAT's nullification challenge is successful it would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Although we are continuing to advance discussions with SAT, there can be no certainty on the timing or outcome of such discussions, and the ultimate outcome of such discussions may have a material and adverse effect on the Company.

In 2004, affiliates of Goldcorp Inc. ("Goldcorp") entered into a streaming agreement (the "Prior San Dimas Stream Agreement") with Silver Wheaton Corp., now Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. ("Wheaton") in connection with the San Dimas Mine and two other mines in México. Under the Prior San Dimas Stream Agreement, Goldcorp received cash and securities in exchange for an obligation to sell certain silver extracted from the mines at a price set forth in the Prior San Dimas Stream Agreement.

In order to satisfy its obligations under the Prior San Dimas Stream Agreement, sales were made by Goldcorp through a non-Mexican subsidiary to a Wheaton company in the Caymans ("SWC"). Upon Primero's acquisition of the San Dimas Mine, the Prior San Dimas Stream Agreement was amended and restated, and Primero assumed all of Goldcorp's obligations with respect to the San Dimas Mine concession under the Prior San Dimas Stream Agreement.

As amended and restated, the provisions of the Prior San Dimas Stream Agreement required that, on a consolidated basis, Primero sell to Wheaton during a contract year (August 6th to the following August 5th), 100% of the amount of silver produced from the San Dimas Mine concessions up to 6 million ounces and 50% of silver produced thereafter, at the lower of (i) the current market price and (ii) $4.04 per ounce plus an annual increase of 1% (the "PEM Realized Price"). In 2017, the contract price was $4.30. The price paid by Wheaton under the Prior San Dimas Stream Agreement represented the total value that Primero and its affiliates received for the sale of silver to Wheaton. In May 2018 the Prior San Dimas Stream Agreement was terminated between Wheaton and STB in connection with the Company entering into the New San Dimas Stream Agreement.

The specific terms of the Prior San Dimas Stream Agreement required that Primero sell the silver through one of its non-Mexican subsidiaries, STB, to Wheaton's Cayman subsidiary, Wheaton Precious Metals International Ltd ("WPMI"). As a result, Primero's Mexican subsidiary that held the San Dimas Mine concessions, PEM, entered into an agreement (the "Internal Stream Agreement") to sell the required amount of silver produced from the San Dimas Mine concessions to STB to allow STB to fulfill its obligations under the Prior San Dimas Stream Agreement.

When Primero initially acquired the San Dimas Mine, the sales from PEM to STB were made at the spot market price while the sales by STB to SWC were at the contracted PEM Realized Price, which at that time was $4.04 per ounce. In 2010, PEM amended the terms of sales of silver between itself and STB under the Internal Stream Agreement and commenced to sell the amount of silver due under the Prior San Dimas Stream Agreement to STB at the PEM Realized Price. For Mexican income tax purposes PEM then recognized the revenue on these silver sales on the basis of its actual realized revenue, which was the PEM Realized Price.

103

In order to obtain assurances that the SAT would accept the PEM Realized Price (and not the spot market silver price) as the proper price to use to calculate Mexican income taxes, Primero applied for and received the APA from the SAT. The APA confirmed the PEM Realized Price could be used as PEM's basis for calculating taxes owed by it on the silver sold to STB under the Internal Stream Agreement for taxation years 2010 to 2014.

In 2015 the SAT initiated a legal proceeding seeking to nullify the APA: however, SAT did not identify an alternative basis in the legal claim for calculating taxes on the silver sold by PEM for which it received the PEM Realized Price.

In 2019, the SAT issued reassessments for the 2010 to 2012 tax years in the total amount of $239.0 million (4,919 million MXN) inclusive of interest, inflation, and penalties. In 2021, the SAT also issued a reassessment against PEM for the 2013 tax year in the total amount of $132.3 million (2,723 million MXN) (collectively, the "Reassessments"). The Company believes that the Reassessments were issued in violation of the terms of the APA. The key items in the Reassessments include determining revenue on the sale based on the silver spot market price, denial of the deductibility of interest expense and service fees, SAT technical error related to double counting of taxes, and interest and penalties.

The Company continues to defend the APA in the Mexican legal proceedings, and initiated proceedings under relevant tax treaties between the competent tax authorities of Mexico, Canada, Luxembourg and Barbados, all of which were subsequently dismissed on a unilateral basis by the SAT ("Dismissals") in May 2020. The Company believes that the Dismissals have no legal basis and breach international obligations regarding double taxation treaties, and also that the APA remains valid and legally binding. The Company intends to continue disputing the Reassessments until it has exhausted its domestic and international remedies.

While the Company continues to vigorously defend the validity of the APA and its transfer pricing position, it is also engaging in various proceedings against the SAT seeking to resolve matters and bring tax certainty through a negotiated solution. Despite these extensive efforts and ongoing legal challenges to the Reassessments and the Dismissals, in April 2020 and February 2021, SAT issued notifications to PEM to attempt to secure amounts it claims are owed pursuant to its reassessments issued. These notifications impose certain restrictions on PEM including its ability to dispose of its concessions and real properties, and to restrict access to funds within its bank account (the "Attachment") including VAT refunds, further information of which is provided under the heading "VAT Receivables".

The Company has challenged SAT's Reassessments, Dismissals and Attachment through all domestic means available to it, including annulment suits before the Mexican Federal Tax Court on Administrative Matters ("Federal Court"), which remain unresolved, and a complaint before Mexico's Federal Taxpayer Defense Attorney's Office (known as "PRODECON"). On May 13, 2020, the Company provided its Notice of Intent to the Government of Mexico pursuant to NAFTA. The Notice of Intent commenced a 90-day period for the Government of Mexico to enter into good faith and amicable negotiations with the Company to resolve the dispute. On August 11, 2020, the 90-day period expired without any resolution of the dispute.

104

In September 2020, the Company was served with a decision of the Federal Court seeking to nullify the APA granted to PEM. The Federal Court's decision directs SAT to re-examine the evidence and basis for the issuance of the APA with retroactive effect, for the following key reasons:

(i) SAT's errors in analyzing PEM's request for the APA and the evidence provided in support of the request; and

(ii) SAT's failure to request from PEM certain additional information before issuing the APA.

The Company filed an appeal of the decision to the Mexican Circuit Courts on November 30, 2020. On April 12 and 14, 2021, a Mexican Supreme Court Judge and SAT each submitted writs of certiorari to the Mexican Supreme Court of Justice to bypass consideration of the APA dispute by the Circuit Court. On April 15, 2021, the Plenary of the Supreme Court: i) admitted only one of those writs, ii) requested the Circuit Court to send the amparo file and iii) assigned such writ to the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court to issue the corresponding decision. The resolution of the admitted writ of certiorari remains outstanding.

On March 2, 2021, the Company announced that it submitted a Request for Arbitration to ICSID, on its own behalf and on behalf of PEM, based on Chapter 11 of NAFTA. On March 31, 2021, the Notice of Registration of the Request for Arbitration was issued by the ICSID Secretariat. Once the Tribunal was fully constituted by the appointment of all three panel members on August 20, 2021, the NAFTA Proceedings were deemed to have commenced. The first session of the NAFTA Proceedings was held by videoconference on September 24, 2021 to decide upon the procedural rules which will govern the NAFTA Proceedings. The Tribunal issued Procedural Order No. 1 on October 21, 2021.

If the SAT were to be successful in retroactively nullifying the APA, the SAT may seek to audit and reassess PEM in respect of its sales of silver pursuant to the Old Stream Agreement for 2010 through 2014. Such an outcome would likely have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Should the Company ultimately be required to pay tax on its silver revenues based on spot market prices without any mitigating adjustments, the incremental income tax for the years 2010-2018 would be approximately $228.5 million (4,703 million MXN), before taking into consideration interest or penalties.

Based on the Company's consultation with third party advisors, the Company believes PEM filed its tax returns in compliance with applicable Mexican law and, therefore, at this time no liability has been recognized in the financial statements. The Company intends to continue to challenge the actions of the SAT in Mexican courts. However, due to the ongoing COVID-19 crisis, the Mexican courts continues to be available only on a restricted basis for further hearings on these matters. To the extent it is ultimately determined that the appropriate price of silver sales under the Prior San Dimas Stream Agreement is significantly different from the PEM Realized Price and while PEM would have rights of appeal in connection with any reassessments, it is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial position and results of operations.

105

For the 2015 and subsequent tax years through to the Company's acquisition of PEM, Primero continued to record its revenue from sales of silver for purposes of Mexican tax accounting in a manner consistent with the APA on the basis that the applicable facts and laws have not changed and has paid its taxes accordingly. To the extent the SAT determines that the appropriate price of silver sales under the Internal Stream Agreement is significantly different from the PEM Realized Price and while PEM would have rights of appeal in connection with any reassessments, it would have a material adverse effect on Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

In 2019, pursuant to the ongoing tax audits and in advance of the expiry of statute barred periods of reassessment, the SAT issued reassessments against PEM for the 2010 to 2012 tax years in the total amount of $239.0 million (4,919 million MXN). The SAT also issued a reassessment against PEM for the 2013 tax year in the total amount of $132.3 million (2,723 million MXN) in 2021. The key elements included reassessments based on the market price of silver ($81.2 million), denial of the deductibility of interest expenses and service fees ($40.3 million), SAT technical error related to double counting of taxes ($19.2 million) and interest and penalties ($230.1 million). We believe that we continue to have a legally valid, in force APA for the period 2010 to 2014. The Company is vigorously defending its position and believes that SAT is acting outside of domestic and international tax conventions. If the Company is unable to favourably resolve any of these reassessment matters, there may be a material adverse effect on the Company and its financial condition.

The Company is subject to credit risk through VAT receivables collectible from the government of Mexico. Due to legislative rules and a complex collection process, there is a risk that the Company's VAT receivable balance may not be refunded, or payment will be delayed. Even though the Company has in the past recovered VAT routinely, VAT recovery in Mexico remains a highly regulated, complex and, at times, lengthy collection process. As of December 31, 2021, in connection with the PEM Reassessments, SAT has frozen a PEM bank account containing VAT refunds of $48.0 million (990 million MXN) as a guarantee against certain disputed tax assessments. This balance consists of VAT refunds that the Company has received which were previously withheld by SAT. If the Company doesd not receive the VAT receivable balances or if payment to us is delayed, the Company's financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

Subsequent to December 31, 2021 the Company received an additional $14.8 million (298 million MXN) into the frozen PEM bank account bringing the total balance to $64.0 million (1,288 million MXN).

The Company conducts business operations in various jurisdictions and through legal entities incorporated in several jurisdictions, including Canada, México, USA, Switzerland, and Barbados. The tax laws of these jurisdictions and other jurisdictions in which the Company may conduct future business operations have detailed transfer pricing rules which require that all transactions with non-resident related parties be priced using arm's-length pricing principles and that contemporaneous documentation must exist to support that pricing. The taxation authorities in the jurisdictions where the Company carries on business could challenge its arm's-length related party transfer pricing policies. International transfer pricing is a subjective area of taxation and generally involves a significant degree of judgment. If any of these taxation authorities were to successfully challenge the Company's transfer pricing policies, the Company may be subject to additional income tax expenses and could also be subject to interest and penalty charges. Any such increase in the Company's income tax expense and related interest and penalties could have a significant impact on the Company's future earnings and future cash flows.

106

The Company currently does not use derivative instruments to hedge its silver commodity price risk. The effect of price variation factors for silver or gold cannot accurately be predicted and are at this time completely unhedged. In the past, the Company has entered into forward sales arrangements with respect to a portion of its lead and zinc production. In the future the Company may enter into further forward sales arrangements or other hedging agreements. Hedging involves certain inherent risks including: the risk that the creditworthiness of a counterparty may adversely affect its ability to perform its payment and other obligations under its agreement with the Company or adversely affect the financial and other terms the counter-party is able to offer the Company; the risk that the Company enters into a hedging position that cannot be closed out quickly; and the risk that, in respect of certain hedging products, an adverse change in the market prices for commodities, currencies or interest rates will result in the Company incurring losses in respect of such hedging products as a result of the hedging products being out-of-the money on their settlement dates.

There can be no assurance that a hedging program will be successful, and although hedging may protect the Company from adverse changes in foreign exchange or currency, and interest rate or commodity price fluctuations, it may also prevent the Company from realizing gains from positive changes.

The Company's ability to make deliveries under the streams on the San Dimas Mine or the Santa Elena Mine is dependent on the Company's financial condition and operating performance, which are subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond the Company's control, including the other factors set out in these Risk Factors. Failure to fulfill the Company's commitments under these agreements could result in adverse impacts on the Company's business. Further, if metal prices improve over time, these agreements may reduce the Company's ability to sell resources later at higher market prices due to obligations under these agreements.

The San Dimas Stream Agreement fixes the ratio that will be used to calculate the amount of gold the Company is required to deliver to WPMI on account of silver production at the San Dimas Mine at 70 to 1, with provisions to adjust the ratio if the ratio of the market price of gold to the market price of silver (calculated in accordance with the San Dimas Stream Agreement) moves above or below 90 to 1 or 50 to 1, respectively, for any consecutive 6-month period during the term of the San Dimas Stream Agreement. Any adjustment to the ratio may impact the amount of gold deliverable under the San Dimas Stream Agreement which may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial performance depending on the relative market prices of gold and silver. Subject to such adjustment provisions, the ratio that will be used to calculate the amount of gold the Company is required to deliver under the San Dimas Stream Agreement is fixed. The market prices of gold and silver may fluctuate. At any given time, the amount of gold that the Company is required to deliver under the San Dimas Stream Agreement may have a greater value than the amount of silver production on which the calculation is based. This may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial performance.

107

As disclosed under "General Development of the Business - Most Recent Three Years" the Company has entered into the Springpole Stream Agreement related to the Springpole project, a development stage mining project located in northwest Ontario, Canada that is not currently a producing mine. Accordingly, the Company is subject to risks related to the development of the Springpole project, including the risk that the project may never be developed into a mine and go into production. Development of Springpole into an operating mine is subject to the inherent risks of developing a mining project. The Company is not directly involved in the ownership or operation of Springpole and has no contractual rights relating to its operations. First Mining, not the Company, has the power to determine the manner in which the Springpole project is developed and ultimately exploited, including decisions to develop a mine, commence production, expand, advance, continue, reduce, suspend or discontinue production. As a result, the ability of the Company to purchase payable silver produced at Springpole at the agreed upon price is dependent upon the activities of First Mining, which creates the risk that at any time First Mining may: (i) have business interests or targets that are inconsistent with those of the Company including a decision not to take the Springpole mine into production; (ii) take action contrary to the Company's policies or objectives; (iii) be unable or unwilling to fulfill its obligations under the Springpole Stream Agreement; or (iv) experience financial, operational or other difficulties, including insolvency, which could limit or suspend First Mining's ability to perform its obligations under the Springpole Stream Agreement. In addition, upon certain milestones described in the Springpole Stream Agreement being achieved, the Company is required to make additional payments totalling $5,000,000 in cash and Common Shares of the Company. In the event the Company fails to make such payments, First Mining would have the ability to terminate the Springpole Stream Agreement. If the Springpole Stream Agreement was terminated, the Company would have no right to purchase payable silver from Springpole under the Springpole Stream Agreement as contemplated. Keith Neumeyer, our Chief Executive Officer, a director of First Mining and accordingly may be considered to have a conflict of interest with respect to First Mining and the Springpole Stream Agreement. See "Certain of our directors may have a conflict of interest".

From time to time the Company may enter into sales contracts to sell its products, including refined silver and gold from doré bars, to metal traders after being refined by refining companies. In addition to these commercial sales, the Company also markets a small portion of its silver production in the form of coins and bullion products to retail purchasers directly through the Company's corporate e-commerce website. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in entering into or re-negotiating sales contracts with brokers and metal traders or refining companies and retail purchasers on acceptable terms, if at all. If the Company is not successful in entering into or re-negotiating such sales contracts, it may be forced to sell some or all of its products, or greater volumes of its products than it may desire in adverse market conditions, thereby reducing the Company's revenues on a per ounce basis.

In addition, should any counterparty to any sales contract not honor such contract or become insolvent, the Company may incur losses for products already shipped, may be forced to sell greater volumes of products, may be forced to sell at lower prices than could be obtained through sales on the spot market, or may not have a market for its products. The Company's future operating results may be materially adversely impacted as a result. Moreover, there can be no assurance that the Company's products will meet the qualitative requirements under future sales contracts or the requirements of buyers.

108

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss if a customer or counterparty fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Company's credit risk relates primarily to trade receivables in the ordinary course of business and VAT and other receivables.

The Company sells and receives payment upon delivery of its silver and gold doré and by-products primarily through three customers, with one major international metal broker accounting for 93% of the Company's revenue in 2021. Payments of receivables are scheduled routinely and received normally within sixty days of submission; therefore, the balance of overdue trade receivables owed to the Company in the ordinary course of business is usually not significant.

Effective December 31, 2021, VAT receivable was $47.1 million, of which $22.2 million relates to Minera La Encantada S.A. de C.V. and $22.0 million relates to PEM. SAT has commenced processing VAT refund requests by PEM in June 2021 and as of December 31, 2021, VAT refunds in the amount of $48.0 million have been received into PEM's frozen bank account. We believe that we have full legal rights to the remaining VAT refunds and expect the amounts to be refunded in the future as a result of our refund applications submitted to the Mexican courts; however, there can be no guarantee when or if such amounts will be refunded.

The carrying amount of financial assets recorded in the consolidated financial statements represents the Company's maximum exposure to credit risk. With the exception of the above, the Company believes it is not exposed to significant credit risk.

The further exploitation, development and exploration of mineral properties in which the Company holds an interest or which it acquires may depend upon the Company's ability to obtain financing through equity financing or debt financing, pre-sale arrangements, joint ventures or other means. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining required financing as and when needed. Volatile precious metals and equity markets may make it difficult or impossible for the Company to obtain further financing on favorable terms or at all. If the Company is unable to obtain additional financing, it may be required to delay or postpone exploration, development or production on some or all of its properties, potentially indefinitely.

As of December 31, 2021, the Company had approximately $237.9 million of cash and cash equivalents in its treasury and working capital of $224.4 million while total available liquidity, including $50.0 million of undrawn revolving credit facility (under the Credit Facility (as defined herein)), was $274.4 million. As a result of the Company's ability to earn cash flow from our ongoing operations, we expect to have sufficient capital to support our current operating requirements in the foreseeable future, provided we can continue to generate cash from our operations and that costs of our capital projects are not materially greater than our projections. There is a risk that commodity prices or demand for the products decline, including as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 crisis, and that we are unable to continue generating sufficient cash flow from operations or that we require significant additional cash to fund expansions and potential acquisitions. The availability of such additional cash may be adversely impacted by uncertainty in the financial markets, including as a result of the COVID-19 crisis. Failure to obtain additional financing on a timely basis may cause us to postpone acquisitions, major expansion, development, and exploration plans.

109

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they arise. The Company has in place a planning and budgeting process to help determine the funds required to support the Company's normal operating requirements and contractual obligations.

Based on the Company's current operating plan, the Company believes it has sufficient cash on hand, combined with cash flows from operations, to meet operating requirements as they arise for at least the next 12 months. If commodity prices in the metals market were to decrease significantly, or the Company was to deviate significantly from its operating plan, the Company may need injection of additional capital to address its cash flow requirements.

As of December 31, 2021, the Company's total consolidated indebtedness was $221.1 million, $0.1 million of which was secured indebtedness.

The Company may be required to use a portion of its cash flow to service principal and interest owing thereunder, which will limit the cash flow available for other business opportunities. The Company may in the future determine to borrow additional funds from lenders.

The Company's ability to make scheduled payments of the principal of, to pay interest on, or to refinance its indebtedness depends on its future performance, which is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond the Company's control. The Company may not continue to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service this debt and to make necessary capital expenditures. If the Company is unable to generate such cash flow, it may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets, restructuring debt or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive. The Company's ability to refinance its indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and its financial condition at such time. The Company may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on its debt obligations.

The terms of the Credit Facility requires the Company to satisfy various positive and negative covenants, including maintaining at all times, certain financial ratios and tests. These covenants limit, among other things, the Company's ability to incur certain indebtedness, assume certain liens or engage in certain types of transactions. Any future or additional indebtedness may be subject to more stringent covenants. The Company can provide no assurances that in the future, the Company will not be constrained in its ability to respond to changes in its business or be restricted in its ability to engage in mergers, acquisitions or dispositions of assets. Failure to comply with these covenants, including a failure to meet the financial tests or ratios, would result in an event of default and would allow the lenders thereunder to accelerate maturity of the debt or realize upon security over the Company's assets. An event of default under the Credit Facility could result in a cross-default under the Company's equipment leases, streaming agreements or other indebtedness (and vice versa) and could otherwise materially and adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations and the Company's ability to meet its payment obligations with respect to the Company's debt facilities, as well as the market price of the Company's Common Shares.

110

The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its short-term investments and debt facilities. The Company monitors its exposure to interest rates and has not entered into any derivative contracts to manage this risk. The Company's interest-bearing financial assets comprise of cash and cash equivalents which bear interest at a mixture of variable and fixed rates for pre-set periods of time.

As of December 31, 2021, the Company's exposure to interest rate risk on interest bearing liabilities is limited to its debt facilities and operating leases. The Company's finance leases bear interest at fixed rates. Based on the Company's interest rate exposure on December 31, 2021, a change of 25 basis points increase or decrease of market interest rate does not have a significant impact on net earnings or loss.

The Company may issue and sell additional securities of the Company to finance its operations or future acquisitions including sales pursuant one or more "at-the-market" offerings. The Company cannot predict the size of future issuances of securities of the Company or the effect, if any, that future issuances and sales of securities will have on the market price or any securities of the Company that are issued and outstanding from time to time. Sales or issuances of substantial amounts of securities of the Company, or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect market prices for the securities of the Company that are issued and outstanding from time to time.

The 2027 Notes, in accordance with their terms, are convertible into Common Shares of the Company. In addition, the Company has outstanding stock options, restricted share units and deferred share units and, from time to time, may also issue share purchase warrants of the Company pursuant to which Common Shares may be issued in the future. Any such convertible securities are more likely to be exercised when the market price of the Company's Common Shares exceeds the exercise price of such instruments. The issuance of shares and the exercise of convertible securities and the subsequent resale of such Common Shares in the public markets could adversely affect the prevailing market price of the Company's Common Shares and the Company's ability to raise equity capital in the future at a time and price which it deems appropriate. The Company may also enter into commitments in the future which would require the issuance of additional Common Shares and the Company may grant additional convertible securities. Any share issuances from the Company's treasury will result in immediate dilution to existing shareholders.

111

The market price of the shares of precious metals and resource companies, including the Company, tends to be volatile. The trading price of the Company's shares may be subject to large fluctuations and may increase or decrease in response to a number of events and factors, including the following:

• the Company's operating performance and the performance of competitors and other similar companies;

• the public's reaction to the Company's press releases, other public announcements and the Company's filings with securities regulatory authorities;

• changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by research analysts who track the Company's Common Shares or the shares of other companies in the resources sector;

• the number of the Company's Common Shares to be publicly traded after an offering, including additional Common Shares issued pursuant to a prospectus supplement filed in connection with the Company's Base Shelf Prospectus and Registration Statement;

• acquisitions, strategic alliances or joint ventures involving the Company or its competitors; and

In addition, the market price of the Company's shares are affected by many variables not directly related to the Company's success and are therefore not within the Company's control, including developments that affect the market for all resource sector shares; the breadth of the public market for the Company's shares; the attractiveness of alternative investments; general economic conditions (including increased inflation, supply chain disruptions and changes to economic conditions as a result of the COVID-19 crisis and the ongoing hostilities in Ukraine); legislative changes; possible efforts by investors, including short sellers, to impact the market price of the Common Shares through various means including influencing investors through social media and investor discussion forums (such as the recent impact that Reddit users have had on the market price of certain securities) and short selling; and other events and factors outside of the Company's control. Securities markets frequently experience price and volume volatility, and the market price of securities of many companies may experience wide fluctuations not necessarily related to the operating performance, underlying asset values or prospects of such companies. The effect of these and other factors on the market price of the Company's Common Shares on the exchanges in which the Company trades has historically made the Company's share price volatile and suggests that the Company's share price will continue to be volatile in the future.

It is possible that material changes could occur that may adversely affect management's ability to realize the estimated cash generating capability of the carrying value of non-current assets which may have a material adverse effect on the Company. Impairment estimates are based on management's cash generating assumptions of its operating units, and sensitivity analyses and actual future outcomes may differ from these estimates.

112

The Company's management, with the participation of its President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and the Canadian Securities Administrators.

The Company documented and tested during its most recent fiscal year its internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ("SOX"), using criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"). Management excluded from its assessment the internal controls, policies and procedures of Jerritt Canyon, which the Company acquired control on April 30, 2021. This limitation of scope is in accordance with section 3.3(1)(b) of NI 52-109, which allows for an issuer to limit the design of DC&P or ICFR to exclude a business that the issuer acquired not more than 365 days before the end of the financial period to which the CEO's and CFO's certification of annual filings relates. SOX requires an annual assessment by management and an independent assessment by the Company's independent registered public accounting firm of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. The Company may fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting as such standards are modified, supplemented, or amended from time to time, and the Company may not be able to ensure that it can conclude on an ongoing basis that it has effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of SOX. The Company's failure to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of SOX on an ongoing, timely basis could result in the loss of investor confidence in the reliability of its financial statements, which in turn could harm the Company's business and negatively impact the trading price of its Common Shares or market value of its other securities. In addition, any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm the Company's operating results or cause it to fail to meet its reporting obligations. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to remediate material weaknesses, if any, identified in future periods, or maintain all of the controls necessary for continued compliance, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to retain sufficient skilled finance and accounting personnel, especially in light of the increased demand for such personnel among publicly traded companies. Future acquisitions of companies may provide the Company with challenges in implementing the required processes, procedures and controls in its acquired operations. Acquired companies may not have disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting that are as thorough or effective as those required by securities laws currently applicable to the Company.

No evaluation can provide complete assurance that the Company's internal control over financial reporting will detect or uncover all failures of persons within the Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be reported. The effectiveness of the Company's control and procedures could also be limited by simple errors or faulty judgments. In addition, as the Company continues to expand, the challenges involved in implementing appropriate internal controls over financial reporting will increase and will require that the Company continue to improve its internal controls over financial reporting. Although the Company intends to devote substantial time and incur costs, as necessary, to ensure ongoing compliance, the Company cannot be certain that it will be successful in complying with Section 404 of SOX, or that these controls will prevent theft or fraud, especially where collusion exists amongst employees.

113

The Company has budgeted $207.8 million for 2022 as sustaining capital and expansionary capital for investments in property, plant and equipment, mine development and exploration. Sustaining capital consists of capital expenditures required to maintain current operations. Expansionary capital is earmarked for growth projects to expand current operations. A total of $86.3 million has been earmarked for sustaining capital and $121.5 million has been planned for expansionary projects in 2022. There can be no assurance that such cost estimates will prove to be accurate. The Company may alter its allocation of capital to provide for revised strategic planning, metal price declines or other external economic conditions. Actual costs may vary from the estimates depending on a variety of factors, many of which are not within the Company's control. Failure to stay within cost estimates or material increases in costs could have a material adverse impact on the Company's future cash flows, profitability, results of operations and financial condition.

Factors which may influence costs include the risks outlined under the headings "Operating Hazards and Risks" and "Infrastructure", as well as the following:

• restrictions or regulations imposed by power commissions, governmental or regulatory authorities with respect to planning and construction, including permits, licences and environmental assessments;

• changes in the regulatory environment with respect to planning and construction;

Although the Company has multimodal insurance policies that cover: material damage to buildings, including by earthquakes; material damage to contents, including by earthquakes; loss and consequential damages (including removal, utilities, fixed costs, wages and extraordinary expenses); and responsibility to third parties, such insurance might not cover all the potential risks associated with its operations. These policies also carry deductibles for which the Company would be obligated to pay in connection with a claim thereunder. Liabilities that the Company incurs may exceed the policy limits of its insurance coverage, may not be insurable, or may be liabilities against which the Company has elected not to insure due to high premium costs or other reasons. In any such event, the Company could incur significant costs that could adversely impact its business, operations or profitability.

The Company must generate sufficient internal cash flows and/or be able to utilize available financing sources to finance the Company's continued growth and sustain capital requirements. If the Company does not realize satisfactory prices for its products (principally silver and gold), it could be required to raise significant additional capital through the capital markets and/or incur significant borrowings to meet its capital requirements. These financing requirements may result in dilution to the Company's existing shareholders and could adversely affect the Company's credit ratings and its ability to access the capital markets in the future to meet any external financing requirements the Company might have. In addition, the Company's mining operations and processing and related infrastructure facilities are subject to risks normally encountered in the mining and metals industry. Such risks could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or producing facilities, personal injury, environmental damage, delays in mining or processing, losses and possible legal liability. Any prolonged downtime or shutdowns at the Company's mining or processing operations could materially adversely affect the Company's business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

114

As part of the Company's strategy, the Company will continue efforts to develop and acquire new mineral projects in the growth stage. A number of risks and uncertainties are associated with the exploration, development and acquisition of these types of projects, including political, regulatory, design, construction, labor, operating, technical and technological risks, uncertainties relating to capital and other costs and financing risks.

The level of production and capital and operating cost estimates relating to the expanded portfolio of growth projects are based on certain assumptions and are inherently subject to significant uncertainties. It is likely that actual results for the Company's projects will differ from current estimates and assumptions, and these differences may be material. In addition, experience from actual mining or processing operations may identify new or unexpected conditions which could reduce production below, and/or increase capital and/or operating costs above, current estimates. If actual results are less favorable than current estimates, the combined company's business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity could be adversely impacted.

The Board of Directors had adopted a dividend policy for the Company under which the Company intends to pay quarterly dividends of 1% of the Company's net revenues. The declaration, timing, amount and payment of dividends are at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on then current financial position, profitability, cash flow, debt covenant compliance, legal requirements and other factors considered relevant. The Company will review its dividend policy on an ongoing basis and may amend the policy at any time in light of the Company's then current financial position, profitability, cash flow, debt covenant compliance, legal requirements and other factors considered relevant. As such, no assurances can be made that any future dividends will be declared and/or paid on a quarterly, annual or other basis.

Silver and gold are sold by the Company using a small number of international metal brokers who buy from the Company and act as intermediaries between the Company, the LBM or end consumers. The final product from the Company's facilities comes in the form of silver/gold doré bars. The physical doré bars usually contain silver, gold and other impurities are delivered to one of two refineries where doré bars are refined to commercially marketable 99.9% pure silver bars. The metal refineries charge tolling fees to the Company for their refining services, and deliver refined products of silver, and gold. On December 31, 2021, all of the four operating units of the Company were producing doré bars and no concentrates were being commercially produced.

The Company delivers its production via a combination of private aircraft, armoured cars and trucks to several refineries who then, once they have refined the silver and gold to commercial grades, transfer the silver and gold to the physical market. Doré of precious metal is turned out from refineries usually within 30 calendar days and any final variances in assays is settled at that time through the refiner assigning any liquidation differences to the metal brokers. The Company normally receives 95% to 98% of the value of its sales of doré on delivery to the refinery with final settlements upon outturn of the refined metals, less processing tolling fees. In the event that any such refinery was to become insolvent, the Company may incur losses for products already shipped to such refinery and would also be required to re-route additional products to alternative refineries, which may result in additional expense and delay in selling the Company's products.

115

As the Company has a number of metal brokers and refineries with which it does business, the Company is not economically dependent on any one of its brokers or refineries, however, in 2021 approximately 93% of the Company's revenue was derived from sales through one metal broker. In the event such broker were to become insolvent, the Company may incur losses. The Company's future operating results may be negatively impacted as a result.

The Company's senior management in Vancouver and Europe negotiate sales contracts. Contracts with refining companies are generally negotiated annually, and metals brokers and traders are re-negotiated as required. The Company currently sells its silver and gold contained in doré bars through one international brokerage organization. Additionally, the Company has contractual obligations to deliver a portion of silver and gold through streaming agreements with two international streaming companies.

The Company continually reviews its cost structures and relationships with refining companies and metal traders in order to maintain the most competitive pricing possible while not remaining completely dependent on any single smelter, refiner or trader.

In addition to these commercial sales, the Company also markets a small portion of its silver production in the form of coins and silver bullion products to retail purchasers directly over its corporate e-commerce web site. Less than 2% of the Company's production was sold in retail transactions during 2021. Products sold included half ounce and one-ounce rounds, 10-gram cubes, five-ounce ingots, 10-ounce ingots, one-kilogram bars, 50 ounce poured bars, 100-ounce stacker bars, five-ounce medallions, 10-ounce medallions and an 18-ounce custom coin set.

First Majestic recognizes the growing strategic importance of the management of social and environmental performance to assure the sustainability of the Company's operations, and land access requirements. First Majestic works to avoid, minimize, rehabilitate, offset or compensate for any social or environmental impacts of the Company's activities, while always abiding by environmental regulations and pursuing international best practices.

Aligned with the Company values and commitments to continuous improvement, the Company has developed a strategic and systematic approach to social and environmental management. Responsible practices and systems of governance are incorporated into corporate strategy, policies and management standards, and the Company continuously evaluates and improves its social and environmental performance.

116

First Majestic is committed to socially responsible mining: working ethically and with integrity, taking responsibility for its impacts on the environment and the communities where it operates, while contributing to local sustainable development. First Majestic recognizes that only by acting in a socially responsible manner and integrating such practices into its management systems and standards, can it assure the sustainability of its business.

The Company seeks to develop and maintain collaborative relationships with host communities and aims to contribute to the quality of life and sustainable development in the locations in which it operates. The Company has adopted a Social Management System ("SMS") that addresses key aspects of social performance management and guides its local teams to work to standards aligned with international best practices. First Majestic's approach is rooted in constructive dialogue with local and regional partners and demonstrating transparency regarding its operational plans and activities while respecting the rights, traditions and cultural identity of local communities.

Local teams engage in constructive dialogue with local and regional partners, demonstrating transparency regarding its operational plans and activities and respecting the rights, traditions and cultural identity of local communities.

First Majestic aims to proactively support the development needs of local communities and leverage the social and economic benefits that can be generated by its operations and projects. The Company works to identify and collaboratively address development opportunities that intersect with its business, and actively engage with host communities and other stakeholders to ensure social investments are aligned with local priorities and contribute to development that meets the needs and expectations of our host communities for present and future generations. The Company's local teams work closely with municipal and state governments, local schools, medical services, local business associations and the agricultural sector on a variety of initiatives in the form of infrastructure projects and educational activities in areas such as water, sanitation, agriculture, green energy, youth sports, arts and culture programs, health promotion, environmental management and emergency response.

This past year, the Company's social investments across all sites focused on access to potable water, road construction and maintenance, sanitation and waste management infrastructure, education, health, and communications facilities and programs as well as support for the development of rural economic livelihoods such as small businesses capacity building, agriculture and ranching. Additionally, funding for social development projects in communities was obtained through contributions made by the Company to the México Mining Tax Fund and local partnerships including educational institutions, NGOs, local governments, and public entities

Ultimately, First Majestic acts to build and maintain the trust of local communities, respecting their rights and interests, and contributing in a net positive manner to their socio-economic wellbeing. The policies, programs and procedures First Majestic has developed provides the basis for more measurable and systematic management of social performance of the Company's mining operations and exploration projects.

The First Majestic SMS is based on knowledge management, social performance best practices, clear performance indicators, structured analysis and a longer-term planning process for operational continuity and sustainability. The following core elements of the First Majestic SMS are incorporated at all First Majestic operation and exploration sites:

117

Early in 2022, the three Company's operating mines were recognized for another consecutive year with the Socially Responsible Business Distinction Award by the CEMEFI and the Alliance for Corporate Social Responsibility (Alianza para la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial, "AliaRSE"). Since being acquired by First Majestic, the Santa Elena Mine has been recognized for eight consecutive yearss, La Encantada for two years and San Dimas for five consecutive years. Currently, all of First Majestic's operating and non-operating mines are recognized as Socially Responsible Business by CEMEFI. This honour from within the Mexican community recognizes excellence in CSR management, corporate ethics, work environment, community involvement, and environmental responsibility. The awards affirm First Majestic's commitment to sound CSR practices and demonstrates the Company's commitment to transparency, and social responsibility within its operations and projects in México.

The Company's operations are subject to, and materially conform with, all current environmental laws and regulations in the jurisdictions where it operates. These environmental regulations provide strict restrictions and prohibitions against spills, releases and emission of various substances related to industrial mining operations that could result in environmental contamination.

First Majestic has an Environmental Management System ("EMS") that is applied in all operations to standardize tasks and strengthen a culture focused on preventing, minimizing and mitigating environmental impacts. The EMS is based on international standards and best practices and aligns with all requirements for obtaining the Mexican Clean Industry Accreditation issued by SEMARNAT through PROFEPA in México. External audits of First Majestic's EMS are aimed at reviewing the performance of each of its mining operations. These audits are conducted by PROFEPA-accredited external environmental consultants for evaluating compliance to applicable environmental regulations.

This is part of a strategy for continuous improvement and achieving the Company's goal of obtaining or renewing the Clean Industry Certificate issued by PROFEPA. The Clean Industry accreditation was renewed for another two years at Del Toro in 2018, and at San Dimas in 2019. Other operation sites are working toward certification.

The First Majestic EMS supports the implementation of the environmental policy and is applied in all operations, to standardize tasks and strengthen a culture focused on minimizing environmental impacts.

First Majestic's EMS has implemented an Annual Compliance Program to review all environmental obligations, and these are conducted by each business unit. Additionally, the Company has implemented an on-line risk management platform that contains all the environmental obligations or conditions that must be fulfilled under the environmental permits. Three of First Majestic's business units (Del Toro, Santa Elena and San Dimas) are participating in the voluntary process of audits to assess compliance, through the National Environmental Audit Program of PROFEPA. The San Dimas Mine has completed all requirements for its renewal and is awaiting an announcement by PROFEPA.

118

The Company has implemented an environmental policy and the general objectives of the policy are to:

First Majestic believes that all of its employees and contractors have the right to be safe when at work and is committed to providing the means to achieve a safe and healthy workplace free of accidents and injuries.

First Majestic's Occupational Health and Safety Management Policy directs it to identify, understand, eliminate or control any foreseeable hazards in the workplace and to provide ongoing training, equipment and systems to its employees and contractors, as well as procedures and training for emergency preparedness and response.

The Company's Occupational Health and Safety Management System is applied in all operations to standardize tasks, and strengthen a culture focused on keeping our people safe. Key pillars of the system are Visible Felt Leadership, regulatory compliance, effective industrial hygiene, and fulfillment of the requirements to obtain the Mexico Safe Company Certification, issued by the Mexican Secretariat of Labour and Social Welfare. All of the Company's operations have subscribed to the voluntary program and self-audit process.

First Majestic's people are its most valuable asset. First Majestic's employees and contractors are the core of its business, and the Company believes in a skilled, committed and empowered workforce to contribute to its success.

Wherever the Company works, it strives to be an employer of choice. First Majestic believes that meaningful and productive work is an essential element in human development; it supports its employees and contractors to maintain workplace relationships based on mutual respect, fairness and integrity. Wherever the Company works, it complies with local employment laws and does not tolerate discrimination in any form. First Majestic is committed to fair and equitable employment practices, freedom of association and the right to free collective bargaining, and actively promotes equal opportunity throughout its operations, offices and projects. At First Majestic, we value the diversity of our people, our partners, and communities. We believe a successful organization is built on our commitment in providing a respectful, equitable, diverse and inclusive work environment that promotes trust and encourages innovation, agility and sustainability.

119

The Company's operations strive to follow the highest industry standards and sustainability frameworks to demonstrate, using qualitative and quantitative data, our performance across non-technical Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) issues. As a result of that corporate goal, First Majestic published in 2020 its first Sustainability Report to voluntarily disclose the Company's impacts and benefits across host communities.

The inaugural report sets a foundation to benchmark the Company's sustainability performance for years to come and allows a broader audience to appreciate how business operations are reflected in the Company's commitment to responsible practices and transparency with all stakeholders.

The Company identified as material topics for its operational and care and maintenance sites the following areas:

As a result of the Company's systems, policies, and practices implemented, First Majestic collected relevant and comparable data across its operations. The Sustainability Report and ESG disclosure respond to internationally recognized guidance for extractive companies operating globally and in line with Canadian Enhanced Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Strategy. Those guides include the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights, International Finance Corporation Performance Standards, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), and UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

The taxation of corporations in México and the United States is often complex and is assessed via overlapping layers of taxation on a number of different tax bases, with credits or offsets permitted in certain cases between various tax liabilities. In late 2013, the Mexican government approved major reforms to the Mexican system of taxation, followed by additional reforms enacted in late 2015 and late 2019. The explanation below is not intended to be a detailed and conclusive description of all of the many forms of Mexican corporate taxes but is a current summary of the most relevant and material forms of corporate taxes impacting mining companies operating in México and expected to apply on a prospective basis.

Taxes in México are levied in the normal course of business and are levied in the form of: (i) Corporate Income Taxes (referred to as ISR), (ii) Special Mining Duty (also referred to as Mining Royalty), (iii) Value Added Taxes ("VAT" or "IVA"), (iv) Profit sharing taxes ("PTU"), (v) Mining Rights Taxes, and (vi) Municipal or Property Taxes. All of these taxes (except for Municipal Taxes) are administered at the federal level by Servicio de Administration Tributaria (the "SAT") often referred to as "Hacienda".

120

Corporations' resident in México are taxed on their worldwide income. The applicable tax rates and related tax bases applicable to fiscal 2021 are as follows:

(i) Corporate Income taxes ("ISR") - 30% on a corporation's taxable income in 2021. Normal business expenses may be deducted in computing a corporation's taxable income, including inflationary accounting for certain concepts of revenue and expenses;

(ii) Special Mining Duty - 7.5% on a royalty base which is computed as taxable revenues for income tax purposes (except interest and inflationary adjustment), less allowable deductions for income tax purposes (except interest, inflationary adjustment, depreciation and mining fees), less prospecting and exploration expenses of the year. The royalty is deductible for corporate income tax purposes, therefore after taxes the net impact is 70% of 7.5% or 5.25% after tax;

(iii) Environmental Duty - 0.5% on revenues from the sale of precious metals (gold, silver, platinum). The duty is deductible for corporate income tax purposes;

(iv) Value Added Taxes - 16% payable monthly on taxable receipts from the sales of goods and services in México and 0% on exports, creditable against the IVA paid on deductible services, expenses and imports;

(v) Profit sharing Taxes - 10% on a corporation's taxable income and payable to the workers in the corporation, creditable against corporate income taxes payable;

(vi) Mining Rights Taxes - a nominal rate charged on a per hectare basis on a corporation's mining rights; and

(vii) Municipal Taxes - Zacatecas State (Chalchihuites Municipality) levies a 1.5% tax on the value of constructed facilities at the Del Toro mine.

Dividends received by a Mexican resident from another Mexican resident are exempt from corporate taxes if they are paid out of tax paid retained earnings. Mexican entities have no preferred treatment for capital gains and in some cases capital losses are restricted. A ten-year loss carry-forward period exists, subject to inflation adjustment. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development rules apply to transfer pricing matters crossing country borders. Thin capitalization rules are based on a 3 to 1 debt to equity limitation for foreign companies investing in Mexican mining companies.

There is a 10% withholding tax on dividends distributed to resident individuals or foreign residents (including foreign corporations). Per the México-Canada tax treaty this dividend withholding tax rate may be reduced to 5% in certain instances.

On December 9, 2019, México introduced additional tax reforms to address its Corporate, VAT, and Excise Taxes, referred to as the 2020 Tax Reforms. In addition to a new General Anti-avoidance Rule, the Mexican tax reform of 2020 proposes to deny, under a broad set of circumstances, the deductibility of payments made by Mexican corporations to foreign-related parties subject to a preferred tax regime, where the effective tax rate is less than 22.5%, regardless of whether the payment is made on an arm's length basis.

121

Corporations' resident in the United States are subject to federal taxes as follows:

Net operating losses, losses incurred in business pursuits, can be carried forward indefinitely pursuant to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act; however, they are limited to 80% of the taxable income in the year the carryforward is used.

Per the United States-Canada tax treaty the dividend withholding tax rate may be reduced to 5% in certain instances.

On December 7, 2020, the Company announced that it had adopted a dividend policy under which the Company intends to pay quarterly dividends of 1% of the Company's net revenues commencing after the completion of the first quarter of 2021. The initial quarterly dividend for the first quarter of 2021 was paid in May 2021 and the Company has paid dividends for the second third and fourth quarters of 2021. Payment of the dividends under the dividend policy is subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors. The Company will review the dividend policy on an ongoing basis and may amend the policy at any time in light of the Company's then current financial position, profitability, cash flow, debt covenant compliance, legal requirements and other factors considered relevant. All of the Common Shares of the Company are entitled to an equal share of any dividends declared and paid.

The Company's authorized capital consists of an unlimited number of Common Shares without par value. A total of 261,259,058 Common Shares were issued and outstanding as at the date of this AIF.

Each Common Share of the Company ranks equally with all other Common Shares of the Company with respect to dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of the Company and payment of dividends. The holders of Common Shares of the Company are entitled to one vote for each share of record on all matters to be voted on by such holders and are entitled to receive pro rata such dividends as may be declared by the board of directors of the Company out of funds legally available therefore and to receive, pro rata, the remaining property of the Company on dissolution. The holders of Common Shares of the Company have no redemption, retraction, purchase, pre-emptive or conversion rights. The rights attaching to the Common Shares of the Company can only be modified by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes cast at a meeting of shareholders called for that purpose.

As described above, on December 2, 2021, the Company issued an aggregate of $230 million principal amount of 0.375% unsecured convertible senior notes due January 15, 2027 (the "Notes"). The Notes may be converted by the holders, in whole or in part, at any time. The initial conversion rate for the Notes is 60.3865 Common Shares per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $16.56 per Common Share (subject to certain adjustment provisions). Interest is payable on the Notes semi-annually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year, beginning on July 15, 2022, to holders of record at the close of business on the preceding January 1 and July 1, respectively.

122

On or after January 20, 2025, the Company may redeem for cash all or part of the outstanding Notes, but only if the last reported sale price of the Common Shares for 20 or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day prior to the date the Company provides notice of redemption to holders exceeds 130% of the conversion price in effect on each such trading day. The redemption price will equal to the sum of (1) 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed and (2) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date. The outstanding Notes are also redeemable by the Company in the event of certain changes to the laws governing Canadian withholding taxes.

The Company is required to offer to purchase for cash all of the outstanding Notes upon a "fundamental change" as described in the Note Indenture, at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be purchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the purchase date.

The Notes do not carry any rights to vote alongside the holders of the Company's Common Shares on any shareholder resolutions.

The Notes are governed by the Note Indenture, a copy of which is available under the Company's profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

The Common Shares of the Company are listed and posted for trading on the TSX under the trading symbol "FR". The following table sets forth the high and low trading prices and trading volume of the Common Shares of the Company as reported by the TSX for the periods indicated:

123

The Common Shares of the Company are also listed and posted for trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol "AG". The following table sets forth the high and low trading prices and trading volume of the Common Shares of the Company as reported by the New York Stock Exchange for the periods indicated:

The Common Shares of the Company are also quoted on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the symbol "FMV".

The following table sets forth the date, price and number of options that were granted by the Company during the financial year ended December 31, 2021:

The following table sets forth the date and number of restricted share units that were granted by the Company during the financial year ended December 31, 2021:

124

The following table sets forth the date and number of performance share units that were granted by the Company during the financial year ended December 31, 2021:

The following table sets forth the date and number of deferred share units that were granted by the Company during the financial year ended December 31, 2021:

The following table sets out the names of the current directors and officers of the Company, their respective provinces or states and countries of residence, positions with the Company, principal occupations within the five preceding years, periods during which each director has served as a director and the number of each class of securities of the Company and percentage of such class beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or subject to control or direction by that person.

The term of each of the current directors of the Company will expire at the Company's next Annual General Meeting unless his or her office is earlier vacated in accordance with the Articles of the Company, or he or she becomes disqualified to act as a director. The Company is not required to have an executive committee but it has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee as indicated below.

125

126

127

128

(1) The information as to principal occupation and shares beneficially owned has been furnished by the respective individuals.

(2) Based upon the 261,259,058 Common Shares of the Company issued and outstanding as of the date of this AIF.

The directors and senior officers of the Company beneficially own, directly or indirectly, or exercise control or direction over an aggregate of 4,245,753 Common Shares of the Company or approximately 2% of the Common Shares of the Company issued and outstanding as of the date of this AIF.

To the knowledge of the Company, no director or executive officer of the Company nor a shareholder holding a sufficient number of Common Shares of the Company to materially affect the control of the Company, nor a personal holding company of any of them,

(a) is, at the date of this AIF or has been within the 10 years before the date of this AIF, a director or executive officer of any company (including the Company), that while that person was acting in that capacity,

(i) was the subject of a cease trade order or similar order or an order that denied the relevant company access to any exemption under securities legislation, for a period of more than 30 consecutive days; or

129

(ii) was subject to an event that resulted, after the director or executive officer ceased to be a director or executive officer, in the company being the subject of a cease trade or similar order or an order that denied the relevant company access to any exemption under securities registration, for a period of more than 30 consecutive days; or

(iii) within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement, or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager, or trustee appointed to hold its assets; or

(b) has, within the 10 years before the date of this AIF, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or comprise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of the director, officer or shareholder.

To the knowledge of the Company, no director or executive officer of the Company, nor a shareholder holding a sufficient number of Common Shares of the Company to affect materially the control of the Company, nor a personal holding company of any of them, has been subject to:

(a) any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a security's regulatory authority; or

(b) any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.

Certain directors of the Company are also directors or officers or shareholders of other companies that are similarly engaged in the business of acquiring, developing and exploiting mineral properties. Such associations may give rise to conflicts of interest from time to time. The directors of the Company are required by law and by the Company's policies to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Company and to disclose any interest which they may have in any project or opportunity of the Company. If a conflict of interest arises at a meeting of the board of directors, any director in a conflict is required to disclose his interest and abstain from voting on such matter. In determining whether or not the Company will participate in any project or opportunity, the directors will primarily consider the degree of risk to which the Company may be exposed and its financial position at that time.

Pursuant to the provisions of National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees ("NI 52-110") the Company is required to provide the following disclosure with respect to its Audit Committee.

130

The text of the Audit Committee's Charter is attached as Appendix "A" to this AIF.

Members of the Audit Committee are Douglas Penrose, Marjorie Co, Jean des Riviéres and Colette Rustad. All four members are independent within the meaning of applicable securities laws and all four members are considered financially literate.

Douglas Penrose received his Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Toronto. He has been a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ontario from 1974 to 2008 and the Institute of Chartered Accountants of British Columbia since 1978. He brings over 20 years of experience in leadership positions in corporate finance, including the position of Chief Financial Officer and was most recently the Vice President of Finance and Corporate Services at the British Columbia Lottery Corporation.

Marjorie Co was called to the British Columbia Bar in 1996 and is a Member of the Law Society of British Columbia. Ms. Co obtained her Master of Business Administration and Bachelor of Laws degrees from the University of British Columbia, and her Bachelor of Science degree from Simon Fraser University. Ms. Co currently provides business development and legal advice for technology-focused organizations and start-up companies. Her previous roles have included being the Director of Strategic Relations at Westport Innovations and Chief Development Officer at The Proof Centre of Excellence.

Mr. des Rivières has worked in over 50 countries over the past 35 years and brings a wealth of knowledge in exploration and the global mining industry. He most recently held the position of Vice President Metals Exploration at BHP and has previously held managerial and technical positions at Rio Algom, BHP and Noranda. Mr. des Rivières has a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology from Université du Québec à Montréal and a Master of Science in Geology from École Polytechnique de Montréal from the University of Montréal.

Ms. Rustad is an international financial expert with over 30 years of diverse financial and operational experience, including mergers and acquisitions, project construction, risk management and advisory expertise in the mining, financial services, energy and technology sectors. She currently serves as a director of the Sanford Housing Society, previously served as a director for Terrane Metals and held executive positions at Barrick Africa, VP & CFO; Goldcorp Inc, Senior Vice-President Treasurer and Controller; EY Toronto, Senior Manager and Alio Gold, EVP & CFO. She is a Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA)(CA) and has a Bachelor of Commerce from the University of Calgary and completed the Advanced Management Program from the Wharton Graduate School of Business, University of Pennsylvania.

Since the commencement of the Company's most recently completed financial year, the Company has not relied on:

131

c. the exemption in section 3.4 (Events Outside the Control of the Member) of NI 52-110;

d. the exemption in section 3.5 (Death, Disability or Resignation of Audit Committee Member) of NI 52-110; or

e. an exemption from NI 52-110 in whole or in part, granted under Part 8 of NI 52-110.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company's Board of Directors adopted all recommendations by the Audit Committee with respect to the nomination and compensation of the external auditor.

The Audit Committee has adopted specific policies for the engagement of non-audit services to be provided to the Company by the external auditor which require the auditor to submit to the Audit Committee a proposal for services to be provided and cost estimates for approval.

The following table sets out the fees billed to the Company by Deloitte LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, and its affiliates for professional services in each of the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

Audit fees include fees for services rendered by the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in relation to the audit and review of our financial statements and in connection with our statutory and regulatory filings. Tax fees includes professional services rendered by the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. Audit related fees include an audit opinion on housing fund remittances in Mexico. The 2021 audit fee includes amounts for 2021 audit services as well as final billings from the 2020 audit which were received in 2021.

132

Other than as disclosed herein, no director, executive officer or persons or companies who beneficially own, control or direct, directly or indirectly, more than 10 percent of any class of outstanding voting securities of the Company, nor any associate or affiliate of the foregoing persons, has or has had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transactions with the Company within the three most recently completed financial years or during the current financial year, that has materially affected or is reasonably expected to have a material effect on the Company.

The Company's transfer agent and registrar is Computershare Trust Company of Canada ("Computershare"). Computershare's register of transfers for the Common Shares of the Company is located at 510 Burrard Street, Second Floor, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C 3B9.

Pursuant to a share purchase agreement (the "FSR Purchase Agreement") dated April 3, 2006, the Company acquired a controlling interest in First Silver Reserve ("FSR") for an aggregate purchase price of C$53.4 million. The purchase price was payable to Hector Davila Santos ("Davila Santos") in three instalments. The first and second instalments totaling C$40.0 million were paid in accordance with the FSR Purchase Agreement. The final 25% instalment of C$13.3 million was not paid to Davila Santos as a result of a dispute between the Company and Davila Santos and his private company involving a mine in México (the "Bolaños Mine") as set out further below.

In November 2007, the Company and FSR commenced an action against Davila Santos (the "Action"). The Company and FSR alleged, among other things that, while holding the positions of director, President and Chief Executive Officer of FSR, Davila Santos through his private company, acquired control of the Bolaños Mine in breach of his fiduciary duties to FSR.

In April 2013, the Company received a positive judgment (the "BC Judgment") from the Supreme Court of British Columbia (the "BC Court"), which awarded the sum of C$96.3 million in favour of First Majestic. The Company received the sum of C$14.85 million (representing monies previously held in trust by Davila Santos' lawyer) on June 27, 2013 in partial payment of the April 24, 2013 judgment, leaving an unpaid amount of approximately C$81.45 million. Subsequently, the BC Court granted orders restricting any transfer or encumbrance of the Bolaños Mine by the defendant and limiting mining at the Bolaños Mine. The orders also require that the defendant preserve net cash flow from the Bolaños Mine in a holding account and periodically provide to the Company certain information regarding the Bolaños Mine and the holding account and periodically provide to the Company certain information regarding the Bolaños Mine (collectively, the "BC Orders").

133

As of December 2016, Davila Santos had exhausted all possible appeals in Canada of the BC Judgment. The Company is now seeking to enforce the BC Judgment and BC Orders in México and elsewhere. To that end, the Company obtained a favourable judgment from the Third Civil District Judge of México City on December 27, 2018, which was later confirmed on appeal on May 17, 2019. Davila Santos then filed a claim before the First Circuit Court which declared on October 25, 2019, that the BC Judgment was contrary to the public order of the Mexican State (the "Public Order Judgment"). The Company filed an appeal for review of the Public Order Judgment on November 14, 2019, before the Thirteenth Federal Court on Civil Matters in Mexico City. Before the Thirteenth Federal Court could render its judgment, Davila Santos filed a petition on August 25, 2020, to Mexico's Supreme Court of Justice (the "MX Supreme Court") to attract the case, and on November 18, 2020, the MX Supreme Court made the determination that the case met the threshold requirements for its review. Resolution of the appeal by the MX Supreme Court remains outstanding due to pandemic-related restrictions on the judiciary.

There can be no guarantee of collection on any of the remaining C$81.45 million of the judgment amounts and it is likely that it will be necessary to take additional action in México and/or elsewhere to recover the balance. Therefore, the Company has not accrued in its financial statements any additional amounts related to the remaining unpaid judgment in favour of the Company.

As described above under "Risk Factors - Challenges to the Advance Pricing Agreement", the SAT, the Mexican tax authority, initiated a legal proceeding seeking to nullify the APA which it issued to Primero in 2012. The APA confirmed Primero's basis for paying taxes on the price it realized for certain silver sales between 2010 and 2014. In 2019 and 2021, pursuant to the ongoing tax audits and in advance of the expiry of statute barred periods of reassessment, the SAT issued reassessments against PEM for the 2010 to 2013 tax years in the total amount of $371.3 million (7,642 million MXN). The SAT has not yet issued a new APA ruling or re-assessed PEM in respect of its sales of silver for 2014. On September 23, 2020, the Federal Court issued a decision nullifying the APA and directing the SAT to issue a new APA ruling and on November 12, 2020, the Company received written reasons for the decision from the Federal Court. On November 30, 2020, the Company filed an appeal of the Federal Court's decision with the Circuit Courts. Since then, two writs of certiorari were submitted to the Mexican Supreme Court of Justice. On April 15, 2021, the Plenary of the Supreme Court i) admitted only one of those writs, ii) requested the Circuit Court to send the amparo file and iii) assigned such writ to the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court. The resolution of the admitted writ of certiorari remains outstanding.

The Company intends to continue to challenge the actions of the SAT in Mexican courts, however due to the ongoing COVID-19 crisis, the Mexican courts are currently available only on a restricted basis for further hearings on these matters. The Company is unable to provide any certainty as to the outcome or timing of such challenge. No tax is payable under the reassessments while such challenges are in process. If the Company's challenge is not successful it would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. For the 2015 and subsequent tax years through to the Company's acquisition of PEM, Primero continued to record its revenue from sales of silver for purposes of Mexican tax accounting in a manner consistent with the APA on the basis that the applicable facts and laws have not changed and has paid its taxes accordingly. To the extent the SAT determines that the appropriate price of silver sales under the Internal Stream Agreement is significantly different from the PEM Realized Price and while PEM would have rights of appeal in connection with any reassessments, it would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

134

The Company also announced on March 2, 2021, that it submitted a Request for Arbitration to ICSID, on its own behalf and on behalf of PEM, based on Chapter 11 of NAFTA. On March 31, 2021, the Notice of Registration of the Request for Arbitration was issued by the ICSID Secretariat. Once the Tribunal was fully constituted by the appointment of all three panel members on August 20, 2021, the NAFTA Proceedings were deemed to have commenced. The first session of the NAFTA Proceedings was held by videoconference on September 24, 2021, to decide upon the procedural rules which will govern the NAFTA Proceedings. The Tribunal issued Procedural Order No. 1 on October 21, 2021. There can be no guarantee as to the outcome of the NAFTA Proceedings.

In December 2019, as part of the ongoing annual audits of the tax returns of Minera La Encantada S.A. de C.V., the SAT issued tax assessments for fiscal 2012 and 2013 in the amount of $7.6 million (155.4 million MXN) and $6.2 million (126.6 million MXN), respectively. The key items relate to forward silver purchase agreement and denial of the deductibility of mine development costs and service fees. The Company continues to defend the validity of the forward silver purchase agreement and will vigorously dispute the assessments that have been issued. The Company, based on advice from legal and financial advisors believes MLE's tax filings were appropriate, and its tax filing position is correct, therefore no liability has been recognized in the financial statements.

No penalties or sanctions were imposed against the Company by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority during the year ended December 31, 2021.

No penalties or sanctions were imposed by a court or regulatory body against the Company that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.

The Company did not enter into any settlement agreements before a court relating to securities legislation or with a securities regulatory authority during the year ended December 31, 2021.

Other than material contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business and upon which the Company's business is not substantially dependent, the following contracts are considered material contracts of the Company:

Deloitte LLP is the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company and is independent within the meaning of the Rules of Professional Conduct of the Chartered Professional Accountants of British Columbia and within the meaning of the Act and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).

135

Ramon Mendoza Reyes, P. Eng., P. Geo., Persio P. Rosario, P.Eng., Maria Elena Vazquez, P. Geo., Phillip J. Spurgeon, P. Geo., Brian Boutilier, P.Eng., David Rowe, CPG and Joaquin Merino, P. Geo, prepared certain technical reports or information relating to the Company's mining properties in Mexico. To management's knowledge, Mr. Merino, does not have any registered or beneficial interests, direct or indirect, in any securities or other property of the Company (or of any of its associates or affiliates). Mr. Merino is consulting as a Senior Advisor in Geology for the Company. Mr. Mendoza-Reyes is the Vice President of Technical Services of the Company, Mr. Rosario is the Vice President of Processing, Metallurgy and Innovation of the Company, Ms. Vazquez is the Geological Database Manager of the Company, Mr. Spurgeon is the Senior Resource Geologist of the Company, Mr. Boutilier is the Operations Manager of the Company and Mr. Rowe is the Director of Mineral Resources of the Company. Each of Mr. Mendoza-Reyes, Mr. Rosario, Ms. Vazquez, Mr. Spurgeon, Mr. Boutilier and Mr. Rowe hold stock options, restricted share units and/or performance share units of the Company which represent less than 1% of the outstanding shares of the Company.

Ryan Rodney, C.P.G., Associate Geologist with SLR International Corporation, Gordon L. Fellows, P.E., former Jerritt Canyon Mine Mining Manager with Jerritt Canyon Gold LLC and current consultant to the Company, Chelsea Hamilton, P. Eng, Project Mining Engineer with SLR Consulting Ltd., Andrew P. Hampton, P. Eng Principal Metallurgist with SLR International Corporation and Jeremy Scott Collyard, MMSA QP, Principal Environmental Specialist and United States Mining and Minerals Sector Lead with SLR International Corporation prepared the Jerritt Canyon Technical Report. To management's knowledge, the foregoing individuals do not have any registered or beneficial interests, direct or indirect, in any securities or other property of the Company (or of any of its associates or affiliates).

Additional information relating to the Company may be found on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

Additional information including directors' and officers' remuneration and indebtedness, principal holders of the Company's securities, and securities authorized for issuance under the Company's equity compensation plan, as applicable, is contained in the Company's information circular for its most recent annual general meeting.

Additional financial information is provided in the Company's audited financial statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2021, a copies of which may be requested from First Majestic's head office, or may be viewed on the Company's website (www.firstmajestic.com) or on SEDAR (www.sedar.com).

136

The purpose of the Audit Committee (the "Committee") is to assist the board of directors (the "Board") of the Company in its oversight responsibilities for:

• the qualifications, independence and performance of the Company's external auditor;

• the Company's systems of disclosure controls and procedures, internal controls over financial reporting, and compliance with ethical standards adopted by the Company.

Consistent with this function, the Committee should encourage continuous improvement of, and should foster adherence to, the Company's policies, procedures, and practices at all levels. The Committee should also provide for open communication among the Company's external auditor, financial and senior management, and the Board.

The Committee has the authority to conduct investigations into any matters within its scope of responsibility and obtain advice and assistance from outside legal, accounting, or other advisers, as necessary, to perform its duties and responsibilities.

In carrying out its duties and responsibilities, the Committee shall also have the authority to meet with and seek any information it requires from employees, officers, directors, or external parties.

The Company will provide appropriate funding, as determined by the Committee, for compensation to the Company's external auditor, to any advisers that the Committee chooses to engage, and for payment of ordinary administrative expenses of the Committee that are necessary or appropriate in carrying out its duties.

A-1

(i) the annual audited financial statements, with the report of the Company's external auditors, Management's Discussion and Analysis for such period and the impact of unusual items and changes in accounting policies and estimates;

(ii) interim unaudited financial statements, Management's Discussion and Analysis for such period and the impact of unusual items and changes in accounting policies and estimates;

(iii) financial information in earnings press releases, including the type and presentation of information, paying particular attention to any pro forma or adjusted non-IFRS information;

(vi) the report that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission requirements be included in the Company's annual proxy statement; and

(vii) financial information in other public reports and public filings requiring approval by the Board.

A-2

This report should be used to evaluate the Company's external auditor's qualifications, performance, and independence. Further, the committee will review the experience and qualifications of the lead audit partner each year and consider whether all partner rotation requirements, as promulgated by applicable rules and regulations, have been complied with. The committee will also consider whether there should be rotation of the Company's external auditor itself. The Committee should present its conclusions to the full board.

Financial Reporting Processes, Accounting Policies and Internal Control Structure

A-3

A-4

This Charter was approved and adopted by the Board on March 10, 2014, as amended on November 30, 2017 (the "Effective Date") and is and shall be effective and in full force and effect in accordance with its terms and conditions from and after such date.

This Charter shall be interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia and the federal laws of Canada applicable in that province.

A-5

PRELIMINARY NOTES	1

GLOSSARY OF CERTAIN TECHNICAL TERMS	4

CORPORATE STRUCTURE	7

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS	9
General	9

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS	10
Principal Markets for Silver	18
Mineral Projects	19
San Dimas Silver/Gold Mine, Durango and Sinaloa States, México	26
Santa Elena Silver/Gold Mine, Sonora State, México	38
La Encantada Silver Mine, Coahuila State, México	51
Jerritt Canyon Gold Mine, Elko County, Nevada, USA	65
Non-Material Properties	78
Risk Factors	84
Product Marketing and Sales	115
Social and Environmental Policies	116
Health and Safety	119
Employment Practices	119
Taxation	120

DIVIDENDS	122

CAPITAL STRUCTURE	122

MARKET FOR SECURITIES	123

PRIOR SALES	124
Options	124
Restricted Share Units	124
Performance Share Units	125
Deferred Share Units	125

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS	125

AUDIT COMMITTEE INFORMATION	130

INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS	133

Development Projects	Location	Acquired
La Luz Silver Project	San Luis Potosí State, México	November 2009
La Joya Silver Project	Durango State, México	October 2015

Mine		Mineral	Tonnage	Grades			Metal Content
	Category	Type	k tonnes	Ag (g/t)	Au (g/t)	Ag-Eq (g/t)	Ag (k Oz)	Au (k Oz)	Ag-Eq (k Oz)
SAN DIMAS
	Proven (UG)	Sulphides	2,328	348	4.42	697	26,050	331	52,190
	Probable (UG)	Sulphides	1,506	265	3.02	504	12,820	146	24,390
	Total Proven and Probable (UG)	Sulphides	3,834	315	3.87	621	38,870	477	76,580

JERRITT CANYON
	Proven (UG)	Sulphides	847	-	5.23	407	-	143	11,090
	Probable (UG)	Sulphides	1,682	-	5.50	428	-	298	23,120
	Total Proven and Probable (UG)	Sulphides	2,529	-	5.41	421	-	440	34,210

SANTA ELENA
	Proven (UG - Ermitano)	Sulphides	162	45	4.70	568	240	25	2,960
	Proven (UG - Santa Elena)	Sulphides	447	144	1.68	280	2,060	24	4,020
	Probable (UG - Ermitano)	Sulphides	2,627	52	3.60	453	4,430	304	38,260
	Probable (UG - Santa Elena)	Sulphides	1,133	133	1.27	236	4,870	46	8,590
	Probable (Pad)	Oxides	188	31	0.55	75	190	3	450
	Total Proven and Probable (UG+Pad)	Oxides + Sulphides	4,557	80	2.75	370	11,790	402	54,280

LA ENCANTADA
	Probable (UG)	Oxides	2,260	170	-	170	12,350	-	12,350
	Total Probable (UG)	Oxides	2,260	170	-	170	12,350	-	12,350

Consolidated FMS
	Proven (UG)	All mineral types	3,784	216	4.09	544	28,350	522	70,260
	Probable (UG)	All mineral types	9,396	121	2.72	368	34,660	797	107,160
	Total Proven and Probable	All mineral types	13,181	149	3.11	419	63,010	1,319	177,420

Mine / Project		Mineral	Tonnage	Grades			Metal Content
	Category / Area	Type	k tonnes	Ag (g/t)	Au (g/t)	Ag-Eq (g/t)	Ag (k Oz)	Au (k Oz)	Ag-Eq (k Oz)
MATERIAL PROPERTIES

SAN DIMAS
	Measured (UG)	Sulphides	2,546	474	6.15	924	38,780	503	75,640
	Indicated (UG)	Sulphides	1,906	336	3.83	616	20,580	235	37,770
	Total Measured and Indicated (UG)	Sulphides	4,452	415	5.15	792	59,360	738	113,410

JERRITT CANYON								-
	Measured (UG)	Sulphides	4,068	-	5.85	421	-	765	55,050
	Indicated (UG)	Sulphides	4,303	-	5.90	425	-	816	58,780
	Indicated (OP)	Sulphides	180	-	4.00	288	-	23	1,660
	Total Measured and Indicated	All Mineral Types	8,550	-	5.84	420	-	1,604	115,490
								-
SANTA ELENA
	Measured Ermitano (UG)	Sulphides	119	56	5.54	627	210	21	2,400
	Measured Santa Elena (UG)	Sulphides	723	155	1.65	278	3,610	38	6,450
	Indicated Ermitano (UG)	Sulphides	2,498	68	4.75	558	5,440	382	44,790
	Indicated Santa Elena (UG)	Sulphides	2,276	127	1.35	228	9,320	99	16,680
	Indicated (Leach Pad)	Oxides Spent Ore	190	34	0.61	79	210	4	490
	Total Measured and Indicated (UG+Pad)	All Mineral Types	5,806	101	2.92	379	18,790	544	70,810
							-	-
LA ENCANTADA
	Indicated (UG)	Oxides	4,308	169	-	169	23,410	-	23,410
	Indicated Indicated Tailings Deposit No. 4	Oxides	2,459	119	-	119	9,410	-	9,410
	Total Measured and Indicated (UG+Tailings)	All Mineral Types	6,767	151	-	151	32,820	-	32,820
							-	-
TOTAL MATERIAL PROPERTIES
	Total Measured	All Mineral Types	7,456	178	5.54	582	42,600	1,327	139,540
	Total Indicated	All Mineral Types	18,120	117	2.68	331	68,370	1,559	192,990
	Total Measured and Indicated	All Mineral Types	25,575	135	3.51	404	110,970	2,886	332,530

Mine / Project		Mineral	Tonnage	Grades			Metal Content
	Category / Area	Type	k tonnes	Ag (g/t)	Au (g/t)	Ag-Eq (g/t)	Ag (k Oz)	Au (k Oz)	Ag-Eq (k Oz)
MATERIAL PROPERTIES

SAN DIMAS
	Inferred Total (UG)	Sulphides	4,073	310	3.54	570	40,660	463	74,630

JERRITT CANYON
	Inferred Total (UG)	Sulphides	6,778	-	5.65	407	-	1,231	88,600
	Inferred Total (OP)	Sulphides	150	-	3.89	280	-	19	1,350
	Inferred Total (UG & OP)	Sulphides	6,927	-	5.61	404	-	1,249	89,950

SANTA ELENA
	Inferred Ermitaño (UG)	Sulphides	3,157	78	2.99	386	7,900	304	39,180
	Inferred Santa Elena (UG)	Sulphides	1,674	114	1.16	200	6,160	62	10,790
	Inferred Total (UG)	Sulphides	4,831	91	2.36	322	14,060	366	49,970

LA ENCANTADA
	Inferred Total (UG)	Oxides	3,470	170	-	170	18,930	-	18,930
	Inferred Inferred Tailings Deposit No. 4	Oxides	428	118	-	118	1,620	-	1,620
	Inferred Total (UG + Tailings)	All Mineral Types	3,898	164	-	164	20,550	-	20,550
	Total Inferred Material Properties	All Mineral Types	19,730	119	3.28	371	75,270	2,078	235,100

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR	133

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS	133

MATERIAL CONTRACTS	135

INTERESTS OF EXPERTS	135

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION	136

APPENDIX "A"	A-1

Producing Silver and Gold Mines	Location	Acquired
La Encantada Silver Mine	Coahuila State, México	November 2006 to March 2007
Santa Elena Silver/Gold Mine	Sonora State, México	October 2015
San Dimas Silver/Gold Mine	Durango State, México	May 2018
Jerritt Canyon Gold Mine	Elko, Nevada, United States	April 2021

Mines under Care and Maintenance	Location	Acquired
La Parrilla Silver Mine	Durango State, México	January 2004
Del Toro Silver Mine	Zacatecas State, México	March 2004 to August 2005
San Martín Silver Mine	Jalisco State, México	May 2006 to September 2006
La Guitarra Silver Mine	México State, México	July 2012

Mine / Project		Mineral Type	Tonnage	Grades					Metal Content
	Category / Area		k tonnes	Ag (g/t)	Au (g/t)	Pb (%)	Zn (%)	Ag-Eq (g/t)	Ag (k Oz)	Au (k Oz)	Pb (M lb)	Zn (M lb)	Ag-Eq (k Oz)

NON-MATERIAL PROPERTIES

SAN MARTIN
	Measured (UG)	Oxides	70	221	0.40	-	-	255	500	1	-	-	580
	Indicated (UG)	Oxides	958	277	0.53	-	-	321	8,520	16	-	-	9,890
	Total Measured and Indicated (UG)	Oxides	1,028	273	0.52	-	-	317	9,020	17	-	-	10,470

LA PARRILLA
	Measured (UG)	Sulphides	15	193	-	1.27	1.27	250	90	-	0.4	0.4	120
	Indicated (UG)	Sulphides	1,028	193	0.07	1.78	1.62	277	6,370	2	40.3	36.6	9,160
	Indicated (UG)	Oxides	76	270	0.09	-	-	278	660	0	-	-	680
	Total Measured and Indicated (UG)	Oxides + Sulphides	1,119	198	0.07	1.65	1.50	277	7,120	3	40.7	37.0	9,960

DEL TORO
	Indicated (UG)	Sulphides	440	193	0.53	3.52	5.75	414	2,720	7	34.2	55.7	5,850
	Indicated (UG)	Oxides + Transition	153	226	0.15	4.97	-	351	1,110	1	16.7	-	1,720
	Total Measured and Indicated (UG)	All Mineral Types	592	201	0.43	3.90	4.27	398	3,830	8	50.9	55.7	7,570

LA GUITARRA
	Measured (UG)	Sulphides	57	217	1.55	-	-	347	400	3	-	-	640
	Indicated (UG)	Sulphides	644	228	1.19	-	-	328	4,730	25	-	-	6,800
	Total Measured and Indicated (UG)	Sulphides	701	228	1.22	-	-	330	5,130	28	-	-	7,440

TOTAL NON-MATERIAL PROPERTIES
	Total Measured	All mineral types	142	216	0.82	0.13	0.13	291	990	4	0.4	0.4	1,340
	Total Indicated	All mineral types	3,298	227	0.49	1.25	1.27	322	24,110	52	91.1	92.4	34,100
	Total Measured and Indicated	All mineral types	3,440	227	0.50	1.21	1.22	320	25,100	55	91.5	92.8	35,440

	Units	SAN DIMAS	SANTA ELENA	LA ENCANTADA	JERRITT CANYON	TOTAL
Ore Processed	Tonnes	822,791	879,060	1,004,144	633,400	3,339,394

Material from Reserves Mined and Processed	Tonnes	768,829	873,151	255,262	171,000	2,068,242

Material Mined from Areas Not In Reserves	Tonnes	53,962	5,909	748,882	462,400	1,271,153

Silver Produced	Ounces	7,646,898	1,954,492	3,241,555	0	12,842,945

Gold Produced	Ounces	81,237	42,088	460	68,567	192,353

Silver-Equivalent Produced from Gold ⁽¹⁾	Ounces	5,878,151	3,087,445	33,243	5,013,999	14,012,838

Silver-Equivalent Produced	Ounces	13,525,049	5,041,937	3,274,798	5,013,999	26,855,783

Type		Total		2022		2023		2024		2025		2026
Mine Development	$	92.6	$	22.4	$	26.2	$	27.4	$	16.6	$	-
Exploration	$	25.1	$	5.4	$	6.2	$	6.2	$	7.3	$	-
Property, Plant & Equipment	$	45.8	$	7.8	$	7.8	$	7.8	$	20.0	$	2.3
Other Sustaining Costs	$	4.5	$	1.1	$	1.1	$	1.1	$	1.1	$	0.1
*Total Sustaining Capital Costs*	$	*168.0*	$	*36.8*	$	*41.3*	$	*42.5*	$	*45.1*	$	*2.4*
Near Mine Exploration	$	24.5	$	5.4	$	6.2	$	6.2	$	5.8	$	0.9
*Total Capital Costs*	$	*192.6*	$	*42.1*	$	*47.5*	$	*48.7*	$	*50.9*	$	*3.3*

Type		$ /tonne milled
Mining Cost	$	58.4
Processing Cost	$	33.0
Indirect Costs	$	49.9
*Total Production Cost*	$	*141.3*
Selling Costs	$	3.6
*Total Cash Cost*	$	*144.9*

Year	Tonnes	Ag g/t	Au g/t	Production area
2010	336,000	na	na	open pit
2011	979,461	48	1.95	open pit
2012	1,092,305	47	1.43	open pit
2013	1,081,159	73	1.61	open pit
2014	213,017	68	1.03	leach pad and underground
2015	432,709	151	2.35	Underground SE
2016	570,723	127	2.24	Underground SE
2017	553,504	115	2.43	Underground SE
2018	531,072	123	2.44	Underground SE
2019	542,085	131	2.31	Underground SE
2020	422,451	116	1.84	Underground SE
2021	549,175	99	1.37	Underground SE
2021	103,742	54	4.83	Underground Ermitaño
2015	573,607	46	0.69	leachpad
2016	417,339	45	0.77	leachpad
2017	374,232	42	0.71	leachpad
2018	368,298	35	0.63	leachpad
2019	333,352	37	0.66	leachpad
2020	217,826	34	0.64	leachpad
2021	226,142	35	0.62	leachpad

Type		$ /tonne
Type		milled
		milled
Mining Cost	$	41.6
Processing Cost	$	34.7
Indirect Costs	$	21.4
*Total Production Cost*	$	*97.6*
Selling Costs	$	5.8
*Total Cash Cost*	$	*103.5*

Item	Units	Value
Gold	$/oz Au	1,750.00
Mill Recovery	%	84.8
Mining Cost	$/t	98.40
Milling Cost	$/t	54.20
General and Administrative (G&A)	$/t	23.50

Category / Area	Mineral Type	Tonnage	Grades			Metal Content
		ktonnes	Ag (g/t)	Au (g/t)	Ag-Eq (g/t)	Ag (k Oz)	Au (k Oz)	Ag-Eq (k Oz)
Measured Central Block	Sulphides	1,717	497	6.32	960	27,450	349	53,020
Measured Sinaloa Graben	Sulphides	638	453	6.45	926	9,300	132	19,000
Measured Other Areas	Sulphides	190	332	3.54	592	2,030	22	3,620
Total Measured	Sulphides	2,546	474	6.15	924	38,780	503	75,640

Indicated Central Block	Sulphides	957	322	3.84	603	9,920	118	18,570
Indicated Sinaloa Graben	Sulphides	381	359	4.39	680	4,390	54	8,330
Indicated Tayoltita	Sulphides	131	320	4.08	619	1,350	17	2,610
Indicated Other Areas	Sulphides	437	350	3.25	588	4,920	46	8,260
Total Indicated	Sulphides	1,906	336	3.83	616	20,580	235	37,770

M+I Central Block	Sulphides	2,675	435	5.43	832	37,370	467	71,590
M+I Sinaloa Graben	Sulphides	1,019	418	5.68	834	13,690	186	27,330
M+I Tayoltita	Sulphides	131	320	4.08	619	1,350	17	2,610
M+I Other Areas	Sulphides	627	345	3.34	589	6,950	67	11,880
Total M+I	Sulphides	4,452	415	5.15	792	59,360	737	113,410

Category / Area	Mineral Type	Tonnage	Grades			Metal Content
		kt	Ag (g/t)	Au (g/t)	Ag-Eq (g/t)	Ag (k Oz)	Au (k Oz)	Ag-Eq (k Oz)
Proven Central Block	Sulphides	1,548	370	4.58	732	18,420	227.8	36,420
Proven Sinaloa Graben	Sulphides	608	323	4.54	682	6,320	88.7	13,330
Proven Other Areas	Sulphides	172	237	2.60	443	1,310	14.3	2,440
Total Proven	Sulphides	2,328	348	4.42	697	26,050	330.8	52,190

Probable Central Block	Sulphides	735	265	3.14	513	6,260	74.3	12,130
Probable Sinaloa Graben	Sulphides	334	277	3.42	547	2,980	36.7	5,880
Probable Tayoltita	Sulphides	51	178	2.93	409	290	4.8	670
Probable Other Areas	Sulphides	386	265	2.46	460	3,290	30.6	5,710
Total Probable	Sulphides	1,506	265	3.02	504	12,820	146.4	24,390

P+P Central Block	Sulphides	2,283	336	4.12	661	24,680	302.1	48,550
P+P Sinaloa Graben	Sulphides	942	307	4.14	634	9,300	125.4	19,210
P+P Tayoltita	Sulphides	51	178	2.93	409	290	4.8	670
P+P Other Areas	Sulphides	558	257	2.51	454	4,600	44.9	8,150
Total P+P	Sulphides	3,834	315	3.87	621	38,870	477.2	76,580

Type		Total		2022		2023		2024		2025		2026		2027
Mine Development	$	11.6	$	6.5	$	3.6	$	1.1	$	0.4	$	-	$	-
Exploration	$	1.1	$	0.3	$	0.3	$	0.3	$	0.3	$	-	$	-
Property, Plant & Equipment	$	36.8	$	6.6	$	5.4	$	2.2	$	10.3	$	11.1	$	1.3
Other Sustaining Costs	$	8.9	$	1.7	$	1.8	$	1.9	$	1.7	$	1.7	$	-
*Total Sustaining Capital Costs*	$	*58.4*	$	*15.1*	$	*11.1*	$	*5.4*	$	*12.7*	$	*12.8*	$	*1.3*
Near Mine Exploration	$	48.3	$	9.6	$	9.6	$	10.0	$	9.6	$	9.6	$	-
*Total Capital Costs*	$	*106.7*	$	*24.7*	$	*20.7*	$	*15.4*	$	*22.3*	$	*22.4*	$	*1.3*

Category/ Area	Mineral Type	Tonnage	Grades					Metal Content
		kt	Ag (g/t)	Au (g/t)	Pb (%)	Zn (%)	Ag-Eq (g/t)	Ag (k Oz)	Au (k Oz)	Pb (M lb)	Zn (M lb)	Ag-Eq (k Oz)
Inferred Rosarios (UG)	Sulphides	265	154	0.16	1.85	1.48	245	1,310	1.4	10.8	8.6	2,090
Inferred Quebradillas (UG)	Sulphides	578	214	0.08	1.85	2.65	319	3,970	1.6	23.6	33.8	5,920
Inferred San Marcos (UG)	Sulphides	185	304	0.03	0.25	0.22	317	1,810	0.2	1.0	0.9	1,890
Total Inferred (UG)	Sulphides	1,028	215	0.09	1.56	1.91	299	7,090	3.2	35.4	43.3	9,900

Inferred Rosarios (UG)	Oxides	280	198	0.08	-	-	205	1,780	0.7	-	-	1,840
Inferred Quebradillas (UG)	Oxides	43	196	0.14	-	-	208	270	0.2	-	-	290
Inferred San Marcos (UG)	Oxides	70	211	0.04	-	-	214	480	0.1	-	-	480
Total Inferred (UG)	Oxides	393	200	0.08	-	-	207	2,530	1.0	-	-	2,610

Total Inferred (UG)	Oxides + Sulphides	1,421	211	0.09	1.13	1.38	274	9,620	4.2	35.4	43.3	12,510

Type		$/tonne milled
Mining Cost	$	97.5
Processing Cost	$	54.0
Indirect Costs	$	22.7
*Total Production Cost*	$	*174.2*
Selling Costs	$	4.8
*Total Cash Cost*	$	*179.0*

Period	High (C$)	Low (C$)	Volume
December 2021	15.47	12.74	12,596,643
November 2021	18.20	14.69	15,115,292
October 2021	17.01	13.14	12,084,667
September 2021	17.09	14.07	11,399,603
August 2021	17.68	14.84	10,738,711
July 2021	19.93	15.72	11,532,473
June 2021	22.73	18.64	15,915,896
May 2021	22.02	18.20	16,108,991
April 2021	22.18	18.40	16,446,206
March 2021	23.58	18.27	21,328,042
February 2021	30.75	19.24	34,047,592
January 2021	24.43	15.05	39,811,588

Period	High ($)	Low ($)	Volume
December 2021	12.16	9.86	95,422,100
November 2021	14.46	11.49	100,365,025
October 2021	13.79	10.45	84,717,242
September 2021	13.66	11.02	83,432,766
August 2021	14.10	11.53	81,150,787
July 2021	16.09	12.34	78,511,527
June 2021	18.93	15.07	101,878,978
May 2021	18.17	14.46	107,657,293
April 2021	17.66	14.98	75,841,981
March 2021	18.65	14.46	107,657,293
February 2021	24.01	15.01	227,833,971
January 2021	19.29	11.81	273,599,011

Date of Grant	Number of Options Granted	Exercise Price (C$)
January 4, 2021	393,500	17.08
January 19, 2021	16,500	15.34
February 9, 2021	12,500	21.90
April 4, 2021	50,000	20.60
April 5, 2021	100,000	20.60
June 14, 2021	543,500	21.73
August 3, 2021	5,000	17.06
August 20, 2021	164,000	15.03
September 28, 2021	15,000	15.02
November 15, 2021	75,000	17.38
December 20, 2021	25,000	13.97

Date of Grant		Number of RSUs Granted
January 4, 2021		287,458
February 17, 2021		2,250
March 31, 2021		1,989
June 14, 2021		8,470
July 1, 2021		1,277
August 20, 2021		11,547

Date of Grant		Number of PSUs Granted
January 4, 2021		175,600
June 14, 2021		4,601
August 20, 2021		3,849

Name, Position and City, Province and Country of Residence	Principal Occupation or Employment for Past 5 Years⁽¹⁾	Period as a Director of the Company	No. and Class of Securities⁽¹⁾	Percentage of Class⁽²⁾

KEITH NEUMEYER CEO, President and Director Zug, Switzerland	President of the Company from November 3, 2001, to present; Director of the Company since December 5, 1998; Director and Chairman of First Mining Gold Corp. from March 31, 2015 to present.	December 5, 1998 to present.	Common 4,005,567 Stock options 751,000 RSUs 181,794 PSUs 147,920	1.5%

DOUGLAS PENROSE, B.Comm., CPA, CA (3) Director Summerland, British Columbia, Canada	Retired; Chairman of the Company from January, 2012 to December 2021.	September 7, 2006 to present.	Common 32,961 Stock options 17,232 RSUs 9,815 DSUs 11,896	Less than 1.0%

MARJORIE CO, BSc, LLB, MBA (3)(5) Director Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada	Principal of mc3 solutions inc. from February, 2015 to present. Principal of Marjorie Co Law Corporation from March, 2020 to present.	March 1, 2017 to present	Common 13,821 Stock options 48,527 RSUs 9,815 DSUs 11,017	Less than 1.0%

Category	Year ended December 31, 2021	Year ended December 31, 2020
Audit Fees	$1,336,000	$1,039,000
Audit Related Fees	$38,000	$37,000
Tax Fees	$4,000	Nil
All Other Fees	Nil	Nil

1.	The Audit Committee must be composed of a minimum of three members. Every member of the Audit Committee must be a director of the Company.

2.	All members of the Committee must, to the satisfaction of the Board, be independent and financially literate in accordance with applicable corporate and securities laws, regulations and stock exchange rules and have such other qualifications as determined by the Board from time to time.

3.	No Committee member may serve on the audit committees of more than two other reporting issuers.

6.	Recommend for appointment by shareholders, compensate, retain, and oversee the work performed by the Company's external auditor retained for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work.

7.	Review the performance and independence of the Company's external auditor, including obtaining written confirmation from the Company's external auditor that it is objective and independent within the meaning of applicable securities legislation and the applicable governing body of the institute to which the external auditor belongs, and remove the Company's external auditor if circumstances warrant.

8.	Actively engage in dialogue with the Company's external auditor with respect to any disclosed relationships or services that may affect the independence and objectivity of the auditor and take appropriate actions to oversee the independence of the Company's external auditor.

9.	Review and preapprove (which may be pursuant to preapproval policies and procedures) all services (audit and non-audit) to be provided by the Company's external auditor. The authority to grant preapprovals may be delegated to one or more designated members of the Committee, whose decisions will be presented to the full Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

10.	Consider whether the auditor's provision of permissible non-audit services is compatible with the auditor's independence.

11.	Review with the Company's external auditor any problems or difficulties and management's responses thereto.

12.	Oversee the resolution of disagreements between management and the Company's external auditor if any such disagreement arises.

13.	Hold timely discussions with the Company's external auditor regarding the following:

	a)	All critical accounting policies and practices.

	b)	All alternative treatments of financial information within IFRS related to material items that have been discussed with management, ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and treatments, and the treatment preferred by the Company's external auditor; and

	c)	Other material written communications between the Company's external auditor and management, including, but not limited to, the management letter and schedule of unadjusted differences.

	a)	The Company's external auditor's internal quality-control procedures.

	b)	Any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review or peer review, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities within the preceding five years with respect to independent audits carried out by the Company's external auditor, and any steps taken to deal with such issues; and

	c)	All relationships between the Company's external auditor and the Company.

17.	Periodically review the adequacy and effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and the Company's internal control over financial reporting, including any significant deficiencies and significant changes in internal controls.

18.	Understand the scope of the Company's external auditors' review of internal control over financial reporting and obtain reports on significant findings and recommendations, together with management responses.

19.	Receive and review any disclosure from the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer made in connection with the certification of the Company's quarterly and annual financial statements, regarding:

	a)	significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data; and

	b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls.

20.	Review major issues regarding accounting principles and financial statement presentations, including any significant changes in the Company's selection or application of accounting principles; major issues as to the adequacy of the Company's internal controls; and any special audit steps adopted in light of material control deficiencies.

21.	Review analyses prepared by management and the Company's external auditor setting forth significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of the financial statements, including analyses of the effects of alternative accounting methods on the financial statements.

22.	Review the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives, as well as off-balance-sheet structures, on the financial statements of the Company.

23.	Review and report to the Board with respect to all related-party transactions, unless a special committee has been established by the Board to consider a particular matter.

24.	Establish and oversee procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters, including procedures for confidential, anonymous submissions by Company employees regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

25.	Oversee, review, and periodically update the Company's Code of Ethical Conduct and the Company's system to monitor compliance with and enforce this code.

26.	Review, with the Company's counsel, legal compliance and legal matters that could have a significant impact on the Company's financial statements.

27.	Discuss policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including appropriate guidelines and policies to govern the process, as well as the Company's major financial risk exposures and the steps management has undertaken to control them.

28.	Consider the risk of management's ability to override the Company's internal controls.

29.	Review with the Company's external auditors, and if necessary, legal counsel, any litigation, claim or contingency, including tax assessments, that could have a material effect upon the financial position of the Company and the manner in which these matters are being disclosed in the financial statements.

30.	Review adequacy of security of information, information systems and recovery plans.

31.	Review the Company's insurance, including directors' and officers' coverage, and provide recommendations to the Board.

32.	Report regularly to the Board regarding the execution of the Committee's duties and responsibilities, activities, any issues encountered and related recommendations.

33.	Discuss, with the Company's external auditor the extent to which changes or improvements in financial or accounting practices have been implemented.

34.	Conduct an annual performance assessment relative to the Committee's purpose, duties, and responsibilities outlined herein.