10-Q 1 iare630201310-q.htm 10-Q IARE 6.30.2013 10-Q

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED June 30, 2013
or
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM            TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-51609
Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland
 
34-2019608
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
 
 
2901 Butterfield Road, Oak Brook, Illinois
 
60523
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
630-218-8000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

_______________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x   No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x   No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. (See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). (Check one)
Large accelerated filer ¨
Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer  x
Smaller reporting company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes  ¨   No x
As of August 8, 2013 there were 900,754,958 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

 



INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
Part I - Financial Information
Page
Item 1.
Financial Statements
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
 
Part II - Other Information
 
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 5.
Item 6.
 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes references to certain trademarks. Courtyard by Marriott®, Marriott®, Marriott Suites®, Residence Inn by Marriott® and SpringHill Suites by Marriott® trademarks are the property of Marriott International, Inc. (“Marriott”) or one of its affiliates. Doubletree®, Embassy Suites®, Hampton Inn®, Hilton Garden Inn®, Hilton Hotels® and Homewood Suites by Hilton® trademarks are the property of Hilton Hotels Corporation (“Hilton”) or one or more of its affiliates. Hyatt Place® trademark is the property of Hyatt Hotels Corporation (“Hyatt”). Intercontinental Hotels Corporation® trademark is the property of InterContinental Hotels Group PLC. Wyndham® and Baymont Inn & Suites, Inc®. trademarks are the property of Wyndham Worldwide. Comfort Inn® trademark is the property of Choice Hotels International. Fairmont® trademark is the property of Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc. The Aloft service name is the property of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.. For convenience, the applicable trademark or service mark symbol has been omitted but will be deemed to be included wherever the above-referenced terms are used.



- i-

 
 
INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
 
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
(unaudited)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
Investment properties:
 
 
 
Land
$
1,639,968

 
$
1,882,715

Building and other improvements
8,043,944

 
8,679,105

Construction in progress
154,802

 
337,384

Total
9,838,714

 
10,899,204

Less accumulated depreciation
(1,538,810
)
 
(1,581,524
)
Net investment properties
8,299,904

 
9,317,680

Cash and cash equivalents
295,944

 
220,779

Restricted cash and escrows
127,397

 
104,027

Investment in marketable securities
305,665

 
327,655

Investment in unconsolidated entities
323,521

 
253,799

Accounts and rents receivable (net of allowance of $10,069 and $10,348)
118,484

 
121,773

Intangible assets, net
234,204

 
298,828

Deferred costs and other assets
109,547

 
115,343

Total assets
$
9,814,666

 
$
10,759,884

 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
Debt
$
5,273,055

 
$
6,006,146

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
143,738

 
142,835

Distributions payable
37,495

 
37,059

Intangible liabilities, net
69,772

 
80,769

Other liabilities
118,905

 
150,325

Total liabilities
5,642,965

 
6,417,134

Commitments and contingencies


 


Stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding
—

 
—

Common stock, $.001 par value, 1,460,000,000 shares authorized, 899,870,571 and 889,424,572 shares issued and outstanding
899

 
889

Additional paid in capital
7,994,206

 
7,921,913

Accumulated distributions in excess of net loss
(3,916,642
)
 
(3,664,591
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
93,113

 
84,414

Total Company stockholders’ equity
4,171,576

 
4,342,625

Noncontrolling interests
125

 
125

Total equity
4,171,701

 
4,342,750

Total liabilities and equity
$
9,814,666

 
$
10,759,884

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

-1-

 INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
 
Three Months Ended
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30, 2013

June 30, 2012
 
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
 
(unaudited)

(unaudited)
 
(unaudited)
 
(unaudited)
Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Rental income
$
144,630


$
140,505

 
$
292,187

 
$
280,150

  Tenant recovery income
18,890


21,121

 
39,526

 
40,016

  Other property income
3,072


2,824

 
6,270

 
5,610

  Lodging income
220,878


193,135

 
406,028

 
329,736

Total income
387,470

 
357,585

 
744,011

 
655,512

Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  General and administrative expenses
12,786


9,434

 
22,937

 
18,306

  Property operating expenses
27,592


26,865

 
55,013

 
51,933

  Lodging operating expenses
137,188


121,129

 
261,028

 
212,291

  Real estate taxes
24,644


23,661

 
48,572

 
44,794

  Depreciation and amortization
97,667

 
99,873

 
197,388

 
196,714

  Business management fee
9,507

 
9,993

 
19,479

 
19,993

  Provision for asset impairment
175,612

 
16,457

 
189,544

 
19,997

Total expenses
484,996

 
307,412

 
793,961

 
564,028

Operating income
$
(97,526
)
 
$
50,173

 
$
(49,950
)
 
$
91,484

Interest and dividend income
4,962


6,003

 
10,193


10,913

Other income
12,356


1,290

 
13,333


1,706

Interest expense
(72,273
)

(72,618
)
 
(146,106
)

(140,658
)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
9,018


2,936

 
8,044


2,517

Gain, (loss) and (impairment) of investment in unconsolidated entities, net
(701
)

—

 
(568
)

(4,200
)
Realized gain, (loss) and (impairment) on securities, net
16,163


(2,445
)
 
17,644


(1,022
)
Loss before income taxes
(128,001
)
 
(14,661
)
 
(147,410
)

(39,260
)
Income tax expense
(674
)
 
(2,128
)
 
(2,704
)

(4,626
)
Net loss from continuing operations
(128,675
)
 
(16,789
)
 
(150,114
)

(43,886
)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
95,919


(1,002
)
 
121,852


(4,115
)
Net loss
(32,756
)
 
(17,791
)
 
(28,262
)

(48,001
)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
—

 
(119
)
 
(8
)

(192
)
Net loss attributable to Company
$
(32,756
)

$
(17,910
)
 
$
(28,270
)

$
(48,193
)
Net loss per common share, from continuing operations
$
(0.14
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.17
)
 
$
(0.05
)
Net income per common share, from discontinued operations
$
0.11

 
$
0.00

 
$
0.14

 
$
0.00

Net loss per common share, basic and diluted
$
(0.03
)

$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.03
)

$
(0.05
)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
897,233,931

 
877,188,933

 
894,679,702


875,037,776

Other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities
(21,577
)
 
7,168

 
25,816

 
25,499

  Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives
—

 
274

 
(4
)
 
(203
)
    Reclassification adjustment for amounts recognized in net income
(16,030
)
 
2,572

 
(17,113
)
 
1,774

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the Company
$
(70,363
)
 
$
(7,896
)
 
$
(19,571
)
 
$
(21,123
)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

-2-


INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(Dollar amounts in thousands)

For the six months ended June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

 
Number of Shares
 
Common
Stock
 
Additional Paid-in
Capital
 
Accumulated
Distributions in excess of Net Loss
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
Noncontrolling Interests
 
Total
Balance at January 1, 2013
889,424,572

 
$
889

 
$
7,921,913

 
$
(3,664,591
)
 
$
84,414

 
$
125

 
$
4,342,750

Net income (loss)
—

 
—

 
—

 
(28,270
)
 
—

 
8

 
(28,262
)
Unrealized gain on investment securities
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
25,816

 
—

 
25,816

Unrealized loss on derivatives
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(4
)
 
—

 
(4
)
Reclassification adjustment for amounts recognized in net income
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(17,113
)
 
—

 
(17,113
)
Distributions declared
—

 
—

 
—

 
(223,781
)
 
—

 
(8
)
 
(223,789
)
Proceeds from distribution reinvestment plan
13,200,963

 
13

 
91,353

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
91,366

Share repurchase program
(2,754,964
)
 
(3
)
 
(19,060
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(19,063
)
Balance at June 30, 2013
899,870,571

 
$
899

 
$
7,994,206

 
$
(3,916,642
)
 
$
93,113

 
$
125

 
$
4,171,701

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

-3-


INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(Dollar amounts in thousands)

For the six months ended June 30, 2012
(unaudited)

 
Number of Shares
 
Common
Stock
 
Additional Paid-in
Capital
 
Accumulated
Distributions in excess of Net Loss
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
Noncontrolling Interests
 
Total
Balance at January 1, 2012
869,187,360

 
$
869

 
$
7,775,880

 
$
(3,155,222
)
 
$
41,948

 
$
(161
)
 
$
4,663,314

Net income (loss)
—

 
—

 
—

 
(48,193
)
 
—

 
192

 
(48,001
)
Unrealized gain on investment securities
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
25,499

 
—

 
25,499

Unrealized gain on derivatives
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(203
)
 
—

 
(203
)
Reclassification adjustment for amounts recognized in net income
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1,774

 
—

 
1,774

Distributions declared
—

 
—

 
—

 
(218,858
)
 
—

 
(231
)
 
(219,089
)
Proceeds from distribution reinvestment plan
13,513,840

 
13

 
97,558

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
97,571

Share repurchase program
(3,349,894
)
 
(3
)
 
(24,182
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(24,185
)
Balance at June 30, 2012
879,351,306

 
$
879

 
$
7,849,256

 
$
(3,422,273
)
 
$
69,018

 
$
(200
)
 
$
4,496,680

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.


-4-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 
Six months ended
 
Six months ended
 
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
 
(unaudited)
 
(unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
Net loss
$
(28,262
)
 
$
(48,001
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
  Depreciation and amortization
204,999

 
221,053

  Amortization of above and below market leases, net
(1,764
)
 
(1,315
)
  Amortization of debt premiums, discounts and financing costs
7,699

 
8,128

  Straight-line rental income
(4,630
)
 
(5,439
)
  Provision for asset impairment
189,544

 
27,887

  (Gain) loss on sale of property
(132,921
)
 
2,231

  Loss on extinguishment of debt
2,396

 
1,398

  Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
(8,044
)
 
(2,517
)
  Distributions from unconsolidated entities
1,373

 
6,224

  (Gain), loss and impairment of investment in unconsolidated entities
568

 
4,200

  Realized (gain) loss on securities
(17,644
)
 
(877
)
  Impairment on investment in securities
—

 
1,899

  Other non-cash adjustments
(389
)
 
605

Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
  Accounts and rents receivable
(4,420
)
 
(3,768
)
  Deferred costs and other assets
8,305

 
4,638

  Accounts payable and accrued expenses
7,763

 
23,537

  Other liabilities
(13,467
)
 
2,888

Net cash flows provided by operating activities
211,106

 
242,771

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
  Purchase of investment properties
(205,293
)
 
(211,020
)
  Acquired in-place and market lease intangibles, net
(4,610
)
 
(5,863
)
  Capital expenditures and tenant improvements
(34,479
)
 
(39,590
)
  Investment in development projects
(22,592
)
 
(55,025
)
  Sale of investment properties
780,535

 
104,550

  Purchase of marketable securities
(2,695
)
 
(19,390
)
  Sale of marketable securities
50,501

 
10,793

  Investment in unconsolidated entities
(5,275
)
 
—

  Distributions from unconsolidated entities
9,149

 
9,435

  Proceeds from the sale of and return of capital from unconsolidated entities
13,774

 
—

  Payment of leasing fees
(2,771
)
 
(3,455
)
  Payments from notes receivable
1,600

 
14

  Restricted escrows and other assets
(12,552
)
 
(940
)
  Other (assets) liabilities
(10,493
)
 
—

Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
554,799

 
(210,491
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
  Proceeds from the distribution reinvestment program
91,366

 
97,571

  Shares repurchased
(19,063
)
 
(24,185
)
  Distributions paid
(223,345
)
 
(218,433
)
  Proceeds from mortgage debt and notes payable
338,578

 
404,508

  Payoffs of mortgage debt
(728,657
)
 
(303,343
)
  Principal payments of mortgage debt
(26,823
)
 
(15,363
)
  Proceeds from and (payoff of) margin securities debt, net
(117,045
)
 
29,122

  Payment of loan fees and deposits
(5,743
)
 
(8,617
)
  Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests, net
(8
)
 
(231
)
Net cash flows used in financing activities
(690,740
)
 
(38,971
)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
75,165

 
(6,691
)
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period
220,779

 
218,163

Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period
$
295,944

 
$
211,472

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

-5-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollar amounts in thousands)

 
Six months ended
 
Six months ended
 
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
 
(unaudited)
 
(unaudited)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
 
 
 
Purchase of investment properties
$
(241,535
)
 
$
(385,766
)
Tenant and real estate tax liabilities assumed at acquisition, net
552

 
492

Assumption of mortgage debt at acquisition
35,963

 
180,000

Non-cash discount (premium) of mortgage debt assumed
702

 
(5,746
)
Assumption of lender held escrows
(974
)
 
4,521

 
$
(205,292
)
 
$
(206,499
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest, net capitalized interest of $4,238 and $5,601
$
144,741

 
$
132,094

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:

 
 
 
Property surrendered in extinguishment of debt
$
5,289

 
$
—

Properties contributed to an unconsolidated entity, net of related payables
$
80,915

 
$
—






See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.





-6-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Readers of this Quarterly Report should refer to the audited consolidated financial statements of Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2012, which are included in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, as certain note disclosures contained in such audited consolidated financial statements have been omitted from this Report. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals, except as otherwise noted) necessary for a fair presentation have been included in these financial statements.

(1) Organization

Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed on October 4, 2004 (inception) to acquire and manage a diversified portfolio of commercial real estate, primarily retail, office, industrial, multi-family (both conventional and student housing), and lodging properties, located in the United States.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, as well as all wholly owned subsidiaries and consolidated joint venture investments. Wholly owned subsidiaries generally consist of limited liability companies (LLCs) and limited partnerships (LPs). The effects of all significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

Each property is owned by a separate legal entity which maintains its own books and financial records and each entity's assets
are not available to satisfy the liabilities of other affiliated entities, except as otherwise disclosed in Debt Note 8.

At June 30, 2013, the Company owned a portfolio of 565 commercial real estate properties compared to 938 properties at June 30, 2012. The breakdown by segment is as follows:
Segment
Property Count
Square Feet/ Rooms/ Units/ Beds
Retail
361
19,463,956
square feet
Lodging
89
16,645
rooms
Office
34
8,499,549
square feet
Industrial
53
13,104,447
square feet
Multi-family
28
5,186 beds / 6,521 units
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
There have been no changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies in the six months ended June 30, 2013. Refer to the Company’s 2012 Form 10-K for a summary of significant accounting policies.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2012 consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2013 presentations. The reclasses primarily represent reclassifications of revenue and expenses to discontinued operations as a result of the sales of investment properties in 2013.
 
(3) Acquired Properties
The Company records identifiable assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests and goodwill acquired in a business combination at fair value. The Company acquired six properties for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and seven properties for six months ended June 30, 2012, for a gross acquisition price of $234,250 and $406,700, respectively. Additionally, during the second quarter 2013, the Company fully placed in service from construction in progress two multi-family properties, University House Fullerton (1,189 beds) and Cityville/Cityplace (356 units), for $133,730 and $67,864, respectively. The table below reflects acquisition activity during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

-7-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

Segment
Property
Date
Gross Acquisition Price
Square Feet / Rooms / Beds
Lodging
Bohemian Hotel Celebration
2/7/2013
$
17,500

115

Rooms
Retail
Westport Village
2/22/2013
33,550

169,603

Square Feet
Lodging
Andaz San Diego Hotel
3/4/2013
53,000

159

Rooms
Multifamily
University House @ TCU
3/7/2013
15,850

118

Beds
Lodging
Residence Inn Denver Center
4/17/2013
80,000

228

Rooms
Retail
South Frisco Village Shopping Center
5/9/2013
34,350

227,175

Square Feet
Total
 
 
$
234,250

 
 
For properties acquired as of June 30, 2013, the Company recorded revenue of $16,585 and property net income of $5,725, not including related expensed acquisition costs in 2013. For properties acquired as of June 30, 2012, the Company recorded revenue of $40,483 and property net income of $11,039, not including related expensed acquisition costs in 2012. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company incurred $736 and $1,374, respectively, of acquisition and transaction costs that were recorded in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income.
 
(4) Discontinued Operations
The Company sold 223 properties and surrendered one property to the lender (in satisfaction of non-recourse debt) during the six months ended June 30, 2013 for a gross disposition price of $720,843. There were thirty-three properties disposed of for the six months ended June 30, 2012 for a gross disposition price of $108,500. The table below reflects sales activity for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Segment
Property
Date
Gross Disposition Price
Sq Ft / Rooms / Units
(unaudited)
Retail
Citizens Banks - 8 Properties
Q1 2013
$
6,596

23,428
Square Feet
Lodging
Baymont Inn - Jacksonville
2/6/2013
3,500

118
Rooms
Multifamily
Nantucket Apartments
3/13/2013
46,100

394
Units
Lodging
Homewood Suites - Durham
3/21/2013
8,300

96
Rooms
Retail
SunTrust - 27 Properties
3/22/2013
50,848

146,851
Square Feet
Office
IDS Center
4/25/2013
253,486

1,462,374
Square Feet
Office
Medical Office Building- 3 Properties
5/2/2013
36,400

181,703
Square Feet
Retail
Citizens Banks - 5 Properties
Q2 2013
7,904

27,182
Square Feet
Retail / Office
SunTrust - 176 Properties
Q2 2013
307,709

883,279
Square Feet
Total
 
 
$
720,843

 
 

The Company has presented separately as discontinued operations in all periods the results of operations for all disposed properties in consolidated operations. The components of the Company’s discontinued operations are presented below, which include the results of operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 in which the Company owned such properties.

-8-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)


Three months ended
 
Three months ended
 
Six months ended
 
Six months ended

June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
 
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
Revenues
$
6,200

 
$
45,211

 
$
26,369

 
$
91,385

Expenses
3,139

 
32,407

 
17,875

 
64,976

Provision for asset impairment
—

 
1,001

 
—

 
7,890

Operating income from discontinued operations
$
3,061

 
$
11,803

 
$
8,494

 
$
18,519

Interest expense and other
(1,515
)
 
(9,171
)
 
(5,251
)
 
(19,005
)
Gain (loss) on sale of properties, net
95,813

 
(2,236
)
 
119,722

 
(2,231
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
(1,440
)
 
(1,398
)
 
(1,097
)
 
(1,398
)
Loss on transfer of assets
—

 
—

 
(16
)
 
—

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
$
95,919

 
$
(1,002
)
 
$
121,852

 
$
(4,115
)

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company had generated proceeds from the sale of properties of $701,535.

(5) Investment in Partially Owned Entities
Consolidated Entities
The Company has ownership interests of 67% in various limited liability companies which own nine shopping centers. These entities are considered variable interest entities (“VIEs”) as defined in ASC 810, and the Company is considered the primary beneficiary of each of these entities. Therefore, these entities are consolidated by the Company. The entities' agreements contain put/call provisions which grant the right to the outside owners and the Company to require these entities to redeem the ownership interests of the outside owners during future periods. Because the outside ownership interests are subject to a put/call arrangement requiring settlement for a fixed amount, these entities are treated as 100% owned subsidiaries by the Company with the amount of $47,762 as of June 30, 2013 reflected as a financing and included within other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Interest expense is recorded on these liabilities in an amount generally equal to the preferred return due to the outside owners as provided in the entities' agreements.
For the VIEs where the Company is the primary beneficiary, the following are the liabilities of the consolidated VIEs which are not recourse to the Company, and the assets that can be used only to settle those obligations.
    
 
As of June 30, 2013
 
As of December 31, 2012
Net investment properties
$
111,597

 
$
113,476

Other assets
8,817

 
8,687

Total assets
120,414

 
122,163

Mortgages, notes and margins payable
(72,404
)
 
(84,291
)
Other liabilities
(48,931
)
 
(49,648
)
Total liabilities
(121,335
)
 
(133,939
)
Net assets
$
(921
)
 
$
(11,776
)
Unconsolidated Entities
The entities listed below are owned by the Company and other unaffiliated parties in joint ventures. Net income, distributions and capital transactions for these properties are allocated to the Company and its joint venture partners in accordance with the respective partnership agreements. Refer to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for details of each unconsolidated entity.
These entities are not consolidated by the Company and the equity method of accounting is used to account for these investments. Under the equity method of accounting, the net equity investment of the Company and the Company’s share of net income or loss

-9-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

from the unconsolidated entity are reflected in the consolidated balance sheets and the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income.
Entity
Description
Ownership %
Investment at
June 30, 2013
 
Investment at
 December 31, 2012
Cobalt Industrial REIT II
Industrial portfolio
36%
$
87,906

 
$
102,599

D.R. Stephens Institutional Fund, LLC
Industrial and R&D assets
90%
40,693

 
34,541

Brixmor/IA JV, LLC
Retail Shopping Centers
(a)
83,983

 
90,315

IAGM Retail Fund I, LLC (b)
Retail Shopping Centers
55%
82,408

 
—

Other Unconsolidated Entities
Various real estate investments
Various
28,531

 
26,344

 
 
 
$
323,521

 
$
253,799

 
(a)
The Company has a preferred membership interest and is entitled to a 11% preferred dividend in Brixmor/IA JV, LLC.
(b)
On April 17, 2013, the Company entered into a joint venture, IAGM Retail Fund I, LLC ("IAGM"), with PGGM Private Real Estate Fund ("PGGM"), for the purpose of acquiring, owning, managing, supervising, and disposing of properties and sharing in the profits and losses from those properties and its activities. The Company initially contributed 13 multi-tenant retail properties totaling 2,109,324 square feet from its portfolio to IAGM for an equity interest of $96,788, and PGGM contributed $79,190. The gross disposition price was $409,277. The Company treated this disposition as a partial sale, and the activity related to the disposed properties remains in continuing operations on the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income, since the Company has an equity interest in IAGM, and therefore the Company has continued ownership interest in the properties. The Company recognized a gain on sale of $12,863, which is included in other income on the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income, and recorded an equity investment basis adjustment of $15,723. The Company amortizes the basis adjustment over 30 years consistent with the depreciation of the investee's underlying assets.
The Company is the managing member of IAGM, responsible for the day-to-day activities and earns fees for venture management, property management, leasing and other services provided to IAGM. The Company analyzed the joint venture agreement and determined that it was not a variable interest entity. The Company also considered PGGM's participating rights under the joint venture agreement and determined that PGGM has the ability to participate in major decisions, which equates to shared decision making ability. As such, the Company does not control IAGM. Therefore, this joint venture is unconsolidated and accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded impairment of its unconsolidated entities of $1,003 and $4,200, respectively.
Combined Financial Information
The following table presents the combined condensed financial information for the Company’s investment in unconsolidated entities.

-10-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

 
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
Balance Sheets:

 

Assets:

 

Real estate assets, net of accumulated depreciation
$
1,722,755

 
$
1,437,268

Other assets
300,028

 
222,096

Total Assets
2,022,783

 
1,659,364

Liabilities and Equity:

 

Mortgage debt
1,255,646

 
1,062,086

Other liabilities
93,264

 
89,573

Equity
673,873

 
507,705

Total Liabilities and Equity
2,022,783

 
1,659,364

Company’s share of equity
$
323,160

 
$
252,994

Net excess of cost of investments over the net book value of underlying net assets (net of accumulated depreciation of $1,472 and $1,714, respectively)
361

 
805

Carrying value of investments in unconsolidated entities
$
323,521

 
$
253,799




Six months ended
 
Six months ended

June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
Statements of Operations:

 

Revenues
$
111,297

 
$
127,735

Expenses:

 

Interest expense and loan cost amortization
25,945

 
34,644

Depreciation and amortization
32,848

 
47,061

Operating expenses, ground rent and general and administrative expenses
36,023

 
42,664

Total expenses
94,816

 
124,369

Net income (loss)
$
16,481

 
$
3,366

Company’s share of:

 

Net income, net of excess basis depreciation of $275 and $171
$
8,044

 
$
2,517


The unconsolidated entities had total third party debt of $1,255,646 at June 30, 2013 that matures as follows:
2013
$
117,228

2014
75,005

2015
61,288

2016
—

2017
—

Thereafter
1,002,125


$
1,255,646


The debt maturities of the unconsolidated entities are not recourse to the Company, and the Company has no obligation to fund such debt maturities. It is anticipated that the ventures will be able to repay or refinance all of their debt on a timely basis.
 

-11-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

(6) Transactions with Related Parties
The following table summarizes the Company’s related party transactions for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

For the six months ended
 
Unpaid amounts as of

June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
 
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
General and administrative:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
General and administrative reimbursement (a)
$
7,849

 
$
5,481

 
$
4,398

 
$
4,017

Loan servicing (b)
—

 
147

 
—

 
—

Investment advisor fee (c)
941

 
867

 
142

 
150

Total general and administrative to related parties
$
8,790

 
$
6,495

 
$
4,540

 
$
4,167

Property management fees (d)
11,734

 
14,514

 
41

 
75

Business management fee (e)
19,479

 
19,993

 
9,507

 
9,910

Loan placement fees (f)
444

 
938

 
—

 
—

(a)
The Business Manager and its related parties are entitled to reimbursement for general and administrative expenses of the Business Manager and its related parties relating to the Company’s administration. Unpaid amounts as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets.
(b)
A related party of the Business Manager provided loan servicing to the Company.
(c)
The Company pays a related party of the Business Manager to purchase and monitor its investment in marketable securities.
(d)
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the property managers, entities owned principally by individuals who were related parties of the Business Manager, are entitled to receive property management fees by property type, as follows: (i) for any bank branch facility (office or retail), 2.50% of the gross income generated by the property; (ii) for any multi-tenant industrial property, 4.00% of the gross income generated by the property; (iii) for any multi-family property, 3.75% of the gross income generated by the property; (iv) for any multi-tenant office property, 3.75% of the gross income generated by the property; (v) for any multi-tenant retail property, 4.50% of the gross income generated by the property; (vi) for any single-tenant industrial property, 2.25% of the gross income generated by the property; (vii) for any single-tenant office property, 2.90% of the gross income generated by the property; and (viii) for any single-tenant retail property, 2.90% of the gross income generated by the property.
In addition to these fees, the property managers receive reimbursements of payroll costs for property level employees. The Company reimbursed or will reimburse the property managers and other affiliates $6,434 and $7,493 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(e)
After the Company’s stockholders have received a non-cumulative, non-compounded return of 5.00% per annum on their “invested capital,” the Company pays its Business Manager an annual business management fee of up to 1.00% of the “average invested assets,” payable quarterly in an amount equal to 0.25% of the average invested assets as of the last day of the immediately preceding quarter. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, average invested assets were $11,149,502 and $11,489,578. The Company incurred a business management fee of $19,479 and $19,993, which is equal to 0.18%, and 0.17% of average invested assets for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Pursuant to the letter agreement dated May 4, 2012, the business management fee shall be reduced in each particular quarter for investigation costs exclusive of legal fees incurred in conjunction with the SEC matter. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company incurred $521 of investigation costs, resulting in a business management fee expense of $19,479 for the six months ended June 30, 2013. In addition, effective July 30, 2013, the Company extended the agreement with the Business Manager through July 30, 2014 and provides that the Company may terminate the Business Manager agreement without cause or penalty upon 30 days’ written notice to the Business Manager. Prior to executing the amendment, the Company could terminate the Business Manager agreement without cause or penalty upon 60 days’ written notice. In all other respects, the terms and conditions of the Business Manager agreement remain unchanged.

-12-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

(f)
The Company pays a related party of the Business Manager 0.2% of the principal amount of each loan placed for the Company. Such costs are capitalized as loan fees and amortized over the respective loan term.
As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had deposited $375 and $375, respectively, in Inland Bank and Trust, a subsidiary of Inland Bancorp, Inc., an affiliate of The Inland Real Estate Group, Inc.

The Company is party to an agreement with an LLC formed as an insurance association captive (the “Captive”), which is wholly-owned by the Company and three related parties, Inland Real Estate Corporation (“IRC”), Inland Diversified Real Estate Trust, Inc., and Inland Real Estate Income Trust, Inc., and a third party, Retail Properties of America ("RPAI"). The Company paid insurance premiums of $6,137 and $6,206 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
In addition, the Company held 899,820 shares of IRC valued at $9,196 as of June 30, 2013. As of December 31, 2012, the Company held 899,820 shares of IRC valued at $7,540.
(7) Investment in Marketable Securities
Investment in marketable securities of $305,665 and $327,655 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, consists of primarily preferred and common stock investments in other REITs and certain real estate related bonds which are classified as available-for-sale securities and recorded at fair value. The cost basis net of impairments of available-for-sale securities was $212,208 and $242,370 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
Unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of comprehensive income until realized. The Company has net accumulated other comprehensive income related to its marketable securities of $93,457 and $85,285, which includes gross unrealized losses of $1,858 and $2,014 related to its marketable securities as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
The Company’s policy for assessing recoverability of its available-for-sale securities is to record a charge against net earnings when the Company determines that a decline in the fair value of a security drops below the cost basis and believes that decline to be other-than-temporary. Factors in the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment include determining whether (1) the Company has the ability and intent to hold the security until it recovers, and (2) the length of time and degree to which the security’s price has declined. No impairment to available-for-sale securities was recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2013. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded impairment of $1,899 for other-than-temporary declines in available-for-sale securities.
Dividend income is recognized when earned. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, dividend income of $8,823 and $9,775, respectively, was recognized and is included in interest and dividend income on the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income.
(8) Debt
Mortgages Payable
Mortgage loans outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $5,274,583 and $5,894,443 and had a weighted average interest rate of 5.10% and 5.10% per annum, respectively. Mortgage premium and discount, net, was a discount of $23,625 and $27,439 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. As of June 30, 2013, scheduled maturities for the Company’s outstanding mortgage indebtedness had various due dates through December 2047, as follows:

-13-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

Maturity Date
 
As of
June 30, 2013
 
Weighted average
annual interest rate
2013
 
$
274,307

 
5.30%
2014
 
590,212

 
3.79%
2015
 
650,343

 
4.63%
2016
 
921,403

 
5.07%
2017
 
1,359,324

 
5.37%
Thereafter
 
1,478,994

 
5.55%
The Company is negotiating refinancing debt maturing in 2013 with various lenders at terms that will allow us to pay comparable interest rates. It is anticipated that the Company will be able to repay, refinance or extend the debt maturing in 2013, and the Company believes it has adequate sources of funds to meet short term cash needs related to these refinancings. Of the total outstanding debt for all years, approximately $433,065 is recourse to the Company.
Some of the mortgage loans require compliance with certain covenants, such as debt coverage service ratios, investment restrictions and distribution limitations. As of June 30, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all mortgage loan requirements except four loans with a carrying value of $66,336; none of which are cross collateralized with any other mortgage loans or recourse to the Company. The stated maturities of the mortgage loans in default are reflected as follows: $12,100 in 2011, $11,000 in 2012 and $43,236 in 2017. The 2011 and 2012 maturities are reflected as 2013 maturities in the table above.

Line of Credit

On May 8, 2013, the Company entered into a credit agreement with KeyBank National Association, JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association and other financial institutions to provide for a senior unsecured credit facility in the aggregate amount of $275,000. The credit facility consists of a $200,000 senior unsecured revolving line of credit and a $75,000 unsecured term loan. The Company has an accordion feature to increase available borrowings up to $600,000 in certain circumstances with lenders' consent. The senior unsecured revolving line of credit matures on May 7, 2016 and the unsecured term loan matures on May 7, 2017. The Company has a one year extension option on the revolver which it may exercise as long as there is no existing default, it is in compliance with all covenants, a 60-day notice has been provided and it pays an extension fee equal to 0.20% of the commitment amount being extended.
As of June 30, 2013, the terms of the credit agreement stipulate:
•
monthly interest-only payments at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.60% to 2.45% on the outstanding balance of the revolver depending on leverage levels, and at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.50% to 2.45% on the outstanding balance of the term loan depending on leverage levels;
•
quarterly unused fees on the revolver ranging from 0.25% to 0.35%, depending on the undrawn amount;
•
the requirement for a pool of unencumbered assets to support the facility, subject to certain covenants and minimum requirements related to the value, debt service coverage, and number of properties included in the collateral pool;

This full recourse credit agreement requires compliance with certain covenants including: a minimum net worth requirement, restrictions on indebtedness, a distribution limitation and investment restrictions. It also contains customary default provisions including the failure to timely pay debt service payable thereunder, the failure to comply with the Company's financial and operating covenants and the failure to pay when amounts outstanding under the credit agreement become due. In the event the lenders declare a default, as defined in the credit agreement, this could result in an acceleration of all outstanding borrowings on the credit facility. As of June 30, 2013, management believes the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants and default provisions under the credit agreement. As of June 30, 2013, the interest rates of the revolving line of credit and unsecured term loan were 2.10% and 2.00%, respectively. Upon closing the credit agreement, the Company borrowed the full amount of the term loan. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had $175,000 available under the revolving line of credit, after drawing $25,000 at closing.




-14-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

Margins payable
The Company has purchased a portion of its securities through margin accounts. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company has recorded a payable of $22,097 and $139,142, respectively, for securities purchased on margin. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the average interest rate on margin loans was 0.543% and 0.560%. Interest expense in the amount of $334 and $427 was recognized in interest expense on the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income for six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

(9) Fair Value Measurements
In accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures, the Company defines fair value based on the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company uses a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which are described below:
•
Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access.
•
Level 2 - Observable inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
•
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.
The Company has estimated the fair value of its financial and non-financial instruments using available market information and valuation methodologies the Company believes to be appropriate for these purposes. Considerable judgment and a high degree of subjectivity are involved in developing these estimates and, accordingly, they are not necessarily indicative of amounts that would be realized upon disposition.
 
Recurring Measurements

For assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, quantitative disclosure of the fair value for each major category of assets and liabilities is presented below:

 
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2013
 
Using Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
 
Using Significant
 Other Observable Inputs
 
Using Significant
 Other Unobservable Inputs
Description
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Available-for-sale real estate equity securities
$
286,872

 
$
—

 
$
—

Real estate related bonds
—

 
18,793

 
—

    Total assets
$
286,872

 
$
18,793

 
$
—

Derivative interest rate instruments
$
—

 
$
(344
)
 
$
—

     Total liabilities
$
—

 
$
(344
)
 
$
—



-15-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012
 
Using Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
 
Using Significant
 Other Observable Inputs
 
Using Significant
 Other Unobservable Inputs
Description
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Available-for-sale real estate equity securities
$
304,811

 
$
—

 
$
—

Real estate related bonds
—

 
22,844

 
—

    Total assets
$
304,811

 
$
22,844

 
$
—

Derivative interest rate instruments
$
—

 
$
(871
)
 
$
—

     Total liabilities
$
—

 
$
(871
)
 
$
—

Level 1
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the fair value of the available for sale real estate equity securities have been valued based upon quoted market prices for the same or similar issues when current quoted market prices are available. Unrealized gains or losses on investment are reflected in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities in other comprehensive income on the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income.
Level 2
To calculate the fair value of the real estate related bonds and the derivative interest rate instruments, the Company primarily uses quoted prices for similar securities and contracts. For the real estate related bonds, the Company reviews price histories for similar market transactions. For the derivative interest rate instruments, the Company uses inputs based on data that is observed
in the forward yield curves which are widely observable in the marketplace. The Company also incorporates credit valuation
adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in
the fair value measurements which utilizes Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads. However, as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company has assessed that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Level 3
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had no level three recurring fair value measurements.
Non-Recurring Measurements
The following table summarizes activity for the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The Company recognized certain impairment charges to reflect the investments at their fair values for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. The asset groups that were reflected at fair value through this evaluation are:
 
For the six months ended
 
For the six months ended
 
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
 
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
Total Impairment Losses
 
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
Total Impairment Losses
Investment properties
$
175,118

 
189,544

 
79,693

 
19,997

Investment in unconsolidated entities
1,794

 
1,003

 
16,914

 
4,200

Total
$
176,912

 
190,547

 
96,607

 
24,197


-16-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company identified certain properties which may have a reduction in the expected holding period and reviewed the probability of these assets' dispositions. The Company’s estimated fair value relating to the investment properties’ impairment analysis was based on a comparison of letters of intent or purchase contracts, broker opinions of value and ten-year discounted cash flow models, which includes contractual inflows and outflows over a specific holding period. The cash flows consist of unobservable inputs such as contractual revenues and forecasted revenues and expenses. These unobservable inputs are based on market conditions and the Company’s expected growth rates. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, capitalization rates ranging from 6.80% to 10.50% and discount rates ranging from 7.50% to 12.00% were utilized in the model and are based upon observable rates that the Company believes to be within a reasonable range of current market rates.
The Company also identified one property in which expectations of future occupancy and leasing changed for a large single tenant office property. The Company became aware of circumstances in which the tenant would reduce the space they occupied. Although the lease does not expire until 2016, the Company analyzed various leasing and sale scenarios for the single tenant property. The Company’s estimated fair value relating to the investment properties’ impairment analysis was based on ten-year discounted cash flow models, which includes contractual inflows and outflows over a specific holding period. The cash flows consist of unobservable inputs such as contractual revenues and forecasted revenues and expenses. These unobservable inputs are based on market conditions and the Company’s expected growth rates. The capitalization rates ranging from 6.25% to 7.75% and discount rates ranging from 7.00% to 8.50% were utilized in this model and are based upon observable rates that the Company believes to be within a reasonable range of current market rates. Based on the probabilities assigned to such scenarios, it was determined the property was impaired and therefore, written down to fair value. An impairment charge of $147,480 was recorded for this asset.
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company identified certain properties which may have a reduction in the expected holding period and reviewed the probability of these assets' dispositions. Capitalization rates ranging from 7.25% to 9.00% and discount rates ranging from 7.50% to 10.00% were utilized in the model and are based upon observable rates that the Company believes to be within a reasonable range of current market rates.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded an impairment of investment properties of $189,544 and $19,997, respectively. Certain properties have been disposed and were impaired prior to disposition and the related impairment charge of $0 and $7,890 are included in discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company identified a certain investment in an unconsolidated entity that may be other than temporarily impaired. The fair value of the investment in the unconsolidated entity was determined by analyzing the entity's underlying asset and each joint venture partner's respective waterfall distribution. This resulted in an impairment charge of $1,003 for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company identified certain investments in unconsolidated entities that may be other than temporarily impaired. The Company’s estimated fair value relating to the investment in unconsolidated entity's impairment analysis was in part based on the expected future cash distributions and on the fair value of the underlying assets of the investment using a discounted cash flow model, including discount rates and capitalization rates on the expected future cash flows of the properties. The cash flows consist of unobservable inputs such as contractual revenues and forecasted revenues and expenses. These unobservable inputs are based on market conditions and expected growth rates. Capitalization rates ranging from 8.00% to 11.25% and discount rates ranging from 10.00% to 11.00% were utilized in the model and are based upon observable rates that the Company believes to be within a reasonable range of current market rates. These factors resulted in an impairment charge of $4,200 for the six months ended June 30, 2012.







-17-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

Financial Instruments not Measured at Fair Value
The table below represents the fair value of financial instruments presented at carrying values in our consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
 
 
June 30, 2013
 
December 31, 2012
 
Carrying Value
Estimated Fair Value
 
Carrying Value
Estimated Fair Value
Mortgage and notes payable
$
5,274,583

$
5,317,999

 
$
5,894,443

$
5,790,201

Margins payable
$
22,097

$
22,097

 
$
139,142

$
139,142

The Company estimates the fair value of its mortgage and notes payable instruments using a weighted average effective interest rate of 5.10% per annum. The assumptions reflect the terms currently available on similar borrowing terms to borrowers with credit profiles similar to the Company's. The Company has determined that its debt instrument valuations are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
(10) Income Taxes
The Company has elected and has operated so as to qualify to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, commencing with the tax year ended December 31, 2005. So long as it qualifies as a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that is distributed to stockholders. A REIT is subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (subject to certain adjustments) to its stockholders (the “90% Distribution Test”). If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, without the benefit of certain relief provisions, the Company will be subject to federal and state income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income, property or net worth and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income. In addition, the Company owns substantially all of the outstanding stock of a subsidiary REIT, MB REIT (Florida), Inc. (“MB REIT”), which the Company consolidates for financial reporting purposes but which is treated as a separate REIT for federal income tax purposes.
The Company has identified certain distribution and stockholder reimbursement practices that may have caused certain dividends to be treated as preferential dividends, which cannot be used to satisfy the 90% Distribution Requirement. The Company has also identified the ownership of certain assets that may have violated a REIT qualification requirement that prohibits a REIT from owning "securities" of any one issuer in excess of 5% of the REIT's total assets at the end of any calendar quarter (the "5% Securities Test"). In order to provide greater certainty with respect to the Company's qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, management concluded that it was in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders to request closing agreements from the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") for both the Company and MB REIT with respect to such matters. Accordingly, on October 31, 2012, MB REIT filed a request for a closing agreement with the IRS. Additionally, the Company filed a separate request for a closing agreement on its own behalf on March 7, 2013.
The Company identified certain aspects of the calculation of certain dividends on MB REIT's preferred stock and also aspects of the operation of certain "set aside" provisions with respect to accrued but unpaid dividends on certain classes of MB REIT's preferred stock that may have caused certain dividends to be treated as preferential dividends. In the case of the Company, management identified certain aspects of the operation of the Company's dividend reinvestment plan and distribution procedures and also certain reimbursements of stockholder expenses that may have caused certain dividends to be treated as preferential dividends. If these practices resulted in preferential dividends, the Company and MB REIT would not have satisfied the 90% Distribution Requirement and thus may not have qualified as REITs, which would result in substantial corporate tax liability for the years in which the Company or MB REIT failed to qualify as a REIT.

-18-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

In addition, the Company and MB REIT made certain overnight investments in bank commercial paper. While the Internal Revenue Code does not provide a specific definition of “cash item”, the Company believes that overnight commercial paper should be treated as a “cash item”, which is not treated as a “security” for purposes of the 5% Securities Test. If treated as a "security", the bank commercial paper would appear to have represented more than 5% of the Company's and MB REIT's total assets at the end of certain calendar quarters. In the event this commercial paper is treated as a "security", the Company anticipates that it would be required to pay corporate income tax on the income earned with respect to the portion of the commercial paper that violated the 5% Securities Test.
The Company can provide no assurance that the IRS will accept the Company's or MB REIT's closing agreement requests. Even if the IRS accepts those requests, the Company and MB REIT may be required to pay a penalty. The Company cannot predict whether such a penalty would be imposed or, if so, the amount of the penalty. The Company believes that (i) the IRS will enter into closing agreements with the Company and MB REIT and (ii) the business manager may be liable, in whole or in part, for any penalty imposed in connection with those closing agreements. As noted above, the Company can provide no assurance that the IRS will enter into closing agreements with the Company and MB REIT or that the Company and MB REIT will not be liable for any penalty imposed in connection with those closing agreements. Management believes based on the currently available information, that such penalty, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on the financial statements of the Company.    
The Company has elected to treat certain of its consolidated subsidiaries, and may in the future elect to treat newly formed subsidiaries, as taxable REIT subsidiaries pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code. Taxable REIT subsidiaries may participate in non-real estate related activities and/or perform non-customary services for tenants and are subject to federal and state income tax at regular corporate tax rates. The Company's hotels are leased to certain of the Company's taxable REIT subsidiaries. Lease revenue from these taxable REIT subsidiaries and its wholly-owned subsidiaries is eliminated in consolidation. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, an income tax expense of $2,704 and $4,626 was included on the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income.

(11) Segment Reporting
The Company has five business segments: Retail, Lodging, Office, Industrial, and Multi-family. The Company evaluates segment performance primarily based on net operating income. Net operating income of the segments exclude interest expense, depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, net income of noncontrolling interest and other investment income from corporate investments. The non-segmented assets primarily include the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, investment in marketable securities, construction in progress, investment in unconsolidated entities and notes receivable.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, approximately 10% of the Company’s rental revenue (related to the retail, office and industrial segments) was generated by three properties leased to AT&T, Inc. and approximately 6% of the Company’s rental revenue (related to the retail, office and industrial segments) was generated by approximately 224 retail banking properties leased to SunTrust Banks, Inc. As a result of the concentration of revenue generated from these properties, if SunTrust or AT&T were to cease paying rent or fulfilling its other monetary obligations, the Company could have significantly reduced rental revenues or higher expenses until the defaults were cured or the properties were leased to a new tenant or tenants.
 

-19-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

The following table summarizes net property operations income by segment as of and for the three months ended June 30, 2013.
 
Total
 
Retail
 
Lodging
 
Office
 
Industrial
 
Multi-family
Rental income
$
141,008

 
$
65,450

 
$
—

 
$
29,677

 
$
20,440

 
$
25,441

Straight line adjustment
3,622

 
1,786

 
—

 
789

 
284

 
763

Tenant recovery income
18,890

 
17,083

 
—

 
1,207

 
469

 
131

Other property income
3,072

 
921

 
—

 
50

 
78

 
2,023

Lodging income
220,878

 
—

 
220,878

 
—

 
—

 
—

Total income
387,470

 
85,240

 
220,878

 
31,723

 
21,271

 
28,358

Operating expenses
189,424

 
24,852

 
145,982

 
4,909

 
1,415

 
12,266

Net operating income
$
198,046

 
60,388

 
74,896

 
26,814

 
19,856

 
16,092

Non allocated expenses (a)
(119,960
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other income and expenses (b)
(39,466
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities (c)
8,317

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Provision for asset impairment (d)
(175,612
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss from continuing operations
(128,675
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income from discontinued operations
95,919

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss attributable to Company
$
(32,756
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(a)
Non allocated expenses consist of general and administrative expenses, business manager management fee and depreciation and amortization.
(b)
Other income and expenses consist of interest and dividend income, interest expense, other income, realized gain (loss) on securities, net, and income tax expense.
(c)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities includes the impairment/loss on sale of investment in unconsolidated entities.
(d)
Total provision for asset impairment included $16,597 related to three retail properties, $158,864 related to two office properties, and $151 related to two multi-family properties.



-20-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

The following table summarizes net property operations income by segment as of and for the three months ended June 30, 2012.
 
Total
 
Retail
 
Lodging
 
Office
 
Industrial
 
Multi-family
Rental income
$
137,386

 
$
68,902

 
$
—

 
$
29,526

 
$
20,164

 
$
18,794

Straight line adjustment
3,119

 
1,631

 
—

 
815

 
620

 
53

Tenant recovery income
21,121

 
18,074

 
—

 
1,783

 
1,101

 
163

Other property income
2,824

 
1,439

 
—

 
47

 
(179
)
 
1,517

Lodging income
193,135

 
—

 
193,135

 
—

 
—

 
—

Total income
357,585

 
90,046

 
193,135

 
32,171

 
21,706

 
20,527

Operating expenses
171,655

 
26,807

 
129,215

 
4,402

 
1,962

 
9,269

Net operating income
$
185,930

 
63,239

 
63,920

 
27,769

 
19,744

 
11,258

Non allocated expenses (a)
(119,300
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other income and expenses (b)
(69,898
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities (c)
2,936

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Provision for asset impairment
(16,457
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss from continuing operations
(16,789
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss from discontinued operations
(1,002
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
(119
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss attributable to Company
$
(17,910
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(a)
Non allocated expenses consist of general and administrative expenses, business manager management fee and depreciation and amortization.
(b)
Other income and expenses consist of interest and dividend income, interest expense, other income, realized gain (loss) on securities, net, and income tax expense.
(c)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities includes the impairment/loss on sale of investment in unconsolidated entities.
(d)
Total provision for asset impairment included $3,287 related to two retail properties and $13,170 related to one multi-family property.




-21-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

The following table summarizes net property operations income by segment as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
 
Total
 
Retail
 
Lodging
 
Office
 
Industrial
 
Multi-family
Rental income
$
285,812

 
$
136,373

 
$
—

 
$
59,279

 
$
40,376

 
$
49,784

Straight line adjustment
6,375

 
3,380

 
—

 
1,446

 
737

 
812

Tenant recovery income
39,526

 
35,055

 
—

 
2,991

 
1,190

 
290

Other property income
6,270

 
2,334

 
—

 
97

 
104

 
3,735

Lodging income
406,028

 
—

 
406,028

 
—

 
—

 
—

Total income
744,011

 
177,142

 
406,028

 
63,813

 
42,407

 
54,621

Operating expenses
364,613

 
50,543

 
277,913

 
9,791

 
2,779

 
23,587

Net operating income
$
379,398

 
126,599

 
128,115

 
54,022

 
39,628

 
31,034

Non allocated expenses (a)
(239,804
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other income and expenses (b)
(107,640
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities (c)
7,476

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Provision for asset impairment (d)
(189,544
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss from continuing operations
(150,114
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income from discontinued operations
121,852

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
(8
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss attributable to Company
$
(28,270
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance Sheet Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate assets, net (e)
$
8,379,307

 
$
2,826,224

 
$
2,774,643

 
$
1,056,769

 
$
781,311

 
$
940,360

Non-segmented assets (f)
1,435,359

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Assets
$
9,814,666

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital expenditures
$
34,479

 
$
6,894

 
$
25,808

 
$
1,649

 
$
18

 
$
110


(a)
Non allocated expenses consist of general and administrative expenses, business manager management fee and depreciation and amortization.
(b)
Other income and expenses consist of interest and dividend income, interest expense, other income, realized gain (loss) on securities, net, and income tax expense.
(c)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities includes the impairment/loss on sale of investment in unconsolidated entities.
(d)
Total provision for asset impairment included $29,413 related to five retail properties, $158,864 related to two office properties, $1,116 related to one industrial property, and $151 related to two multi-family properties.
(e)
Real estate assets include intangible assets, net of amortization.
(f)
Construction in progress is included as non-segmented assets.


-22-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

The following table summarizes net property operations income by segment as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
 
Total
 
Retail
 
Lodging
 
Office
 
Industrial
 
Multi-family
Rental income
$
274,189

 
$
137,538

 
$
—

 
$
59,037

 
$
40,405

 
$
37,209

Straight line adjustment
5,961

 
3,086

 
—

 
1,534

 
1,182

 
159

Tenant recovery income
40,016

 
34,735

 
—

 
3,473

 
1,560

 
248

Other property income
5,610

 
2,076

 
—

 
254

 
311

 
2,969

Lodging income
329,736

 
—

 
329,736

 
—

 
—

 
—

Total income
655,512

 
177,435

 
329,736

 
64,298

 
43,458

 
40,585

Operating expenses
309,018

 
50,738

 
227,091

 
9,279

 
3,268

 
18,642

Net operating income
$
346,494

 
126,697

 
102,645

 
55,019

 
40,190

 
21,943

Non allocated expenses (a)
(235,013
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other income and expenses (b)
(133,687
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity in loss of unconsolidated entities (c)
(1,683
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Provision for asset impairment (d)
(19,997
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss from continuing operations
(43,886
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss from discontinued operations
(4,115
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
(192
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss attributable to Company
$
(48,193
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(a)
Non allocated expenses consist of general and administrative expenses, business manager management fee and depreciation and amortization.
(b)
Other income and expenses consist of interest and dividend income, interest expense, other income, realized gain (loss) on securities, net, and income tax expense.
(c)
Equity in loss of unconsolidated entities includes the impairment/loss on sale of investment in unconsolidated entities.
(d)
The total provision for asset impairment relates to $6,827 related to five retail properties and $13,170 related to one multi-family property.



 

-23-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

(12) Earnings (loss) per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period (the “common shares”). Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the common shares plus potential common shares issuable upon exercising options or other contracts. There are an immaterial amount of potentially dilutive common shares.
The basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding was 894,679,702 and 875,037,776 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
(13) Commitments and Contingencies
Certain leases and operating agreements within the lodging segment require the Company to reserve funds relating to replacements and renewals of the hotels' furniture, fixtures and equipment. As of June 30, 2013 the Company has funded $61,662 in reserves for future improvements. This amount is included in restricted cash and escrows on the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2013.
The Company has learned that the SEC is conducting a non-public, formal, fact-finding investigation to determine whether there have been violations of certain provisions of the federal securities laws regarding the business management fees, property management fees, transactions with affiliates, timing and amount of distributions paid to investors, determination of property impairments, and any decision regarding whether the Company might become a self-administered REIT. The Company has not been accused of any wrongdoing by the SEC. The Company also has been informed by the SEC that the existence of this investigation does not mean that the SEC has concluded that anyone has broken the law or that the SEC has a negative opinion of any person, entity, or security. The Company has been cooperating fully with the SEC.
The Company cannot reasonably estimate the timing of the investigation, nor can the Company predict whether or not the investigation might have a material adverse effect on our business.
Inland American Business Manager & Advisor, Inc. has offered to reduce the business management fee in an aggregate amount necessary to reimburse the Company for any costs, fees, fines or assessments, if any, which may result from the SEC investigation, other than legal fees incurred by the Company, or fees and costs otherwise covered by insurance. The business manager also offered to waive its reimbursement of legal fees or costs that the business manager incurs in connection with the SEC investigation. On May 4, 2012, Inland American Business Manager & Advisor, Inc. forwarded a letter to the Company that memorializes this arrangement.

The Company also has received related demands from stockholders (collectively, the "Stockholder Demands") to conduct investigations regarding claims that the officers, the board of directors, the Business Manager and the affiliates of the Business Manager (the "Inland American Parties") breached their fiduciary duties to the Company in connection with the matters that the Company disclosed are subject to the SEC investigation. The first Stockholder Demand claims that the Inland American Parties (i) falsely reported the value of the Company's common stock until September 2010; (ii) caused the Company to purchase shares of its common stock from stockholders at prices in excess of its value; and (iii) disguised returns of capital paid to stockholders as REIT income resulting in payment of fees to the business manager for which it is not entitled. The three stockholders making that demand contend that legal proceedings should seek recovery of damages in an unspecified amount allegedly sustained by the Company. The second Stockholder Demand made by another stockholder makes similar demands and further alleges that the Inland American Parties (i) caused the Company to engage in transactions that unduly favored related parties; (ii) falsely disclosed the timing and amount of distributions; and (iii) falsely disclosed whether the Company might become a self-administered REIT. The Company also has received a letter from another stockholder that fully adopts and joins in the first Stockholder Demand, but makes no additional demands on the Company to perform investigation or pursue claims.


-24-

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.
(A Maryland Corporation)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except data amounts)

June 30, 2013
(unaudited)

Upon receiving the first of the Stockholder Demands, the full board of directors responded by authorizing the independent directors to investigate the claims contained in the first Stockholder Demand, any subsequent stockholder demands, as well as any other matters the independent directors see fit to investigate, including matters related to the SEC investigation. Pursuant to this authority, the independent directors have formed a special litigation committee that is comprised solely of independent directors to review and evaluate the matters referred by the full Board to the independent directors, and to recommend to the full Board any further action as is appropriate. The special litigation committee is investigating these claims with the assistance of independent legal counsel and will make a recommendation to the Board of Directors after the committee has completed its investigation.

On March 21, 2013, counsel for the stockholders who made the first Stockholder Demand filed a derivative lawsuit in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, on behalf of the Company. The case has been stayed pending completion of the special litigation committee's investigation.
On April 26, 2013, two stockholders of the Company filed a putative class action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against the Company, and current members and one former member of its board of directors ("the Defendants"). The complaint seeks damages on behalf of plaintiffs and similarly situated individuals who purchased additional shares in the Company pursuant to the Company's Distribution Reinvestment Plan ("DRP") on or after March 30, 2009. Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to plaintiffs and to members of the putative class by inflating the yearly estimated share price announced by the Company and by selling shares in the DRP to plaintiffs and members of the putative class at those allegedly inflated prices. The Company believes that the complaint lacks merit and intends to vigorously defend the case.
The Company has also filed a number of eviction actions against tenants and is involved in a number of tenant bankruptcies. The tenants in some of the eviction cases may file counterclaims against the Company in an attempt to gain leverage against the Company in connection with the eviction. In the opinion of the Company, none of these counterclaims is likely to result in any material losses to the Company.

The Company is subject, from time to time, to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. While the resolution of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes, based on currently available information, that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial statements of the Company.
(14) Subsequent Events

On July 1, 2013 the Company contributed the recently purchased South Frisco Village Shopping Center to the IAGM Retail Fund I, LLC joint venture for a gross disposition price of $34,350. On August 1, 2013, the Company sold five multi-family properties for $163,594 as part of a larger portfolio sale. The remaining portfolio, consisting of nine properties, is anticipated to be sold in late August, 2013 and the Company expects to recognize gains on sale. Also subsequent to June 30, 2013 the Company sold eight bank branches for $15,144.

On August 8, 2013, the Company entered into an equity interest purchase agreement with AR Capital, LLC (the "Buyer") to sell its core net lease assets, including 294 properties in an all-cash transaction valued at approximately $2,300,000, including the assumption of approximately $795,300 of debt and repayment by the Company of approximately $360,900 of debt. The Company expects to recognize gains on sale. The properties included retail, office and industrial assets. In connection with entering into the purchase agreement, the Buyer has posted a non-refundable deposit into escrow. The sale is expected to be consummated through three closings, with the initial closing expected to occur approximately 45 days from execution of the purchase agreement, the second closing expected to occur approximately 120 days and the final closing expected to occur on or prior to May 8, 2014. The sale completion is subject to customary closing conditions, and the sale of certain properties is subject to obtaining lender consents in connection with the Buyer's assumption of existing indebtedness, tenant waivers and redeeming joint venture interests. In addition, for a limited period of time following execution of the Purchase Agreement, the Buyer may exclude from the transaction for any reason properties having an aggregate value of up to approximately $183,300, provided the Buyer may not exclude more than 13 properties under this exclusion right. The Buyer may also exclude properties from the transaction for title or environmental conditions subject to certain exceptions and the Company's right to cure, as described in the purchase agreement. The purchase agreement contains limited termination rights for both the Company and the Buyer. The Company filed a form 8-K on August 9, 2013, purchase agreement was attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the filing.

-25-

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

We electronically file our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The public may read and copy any of the reports that are filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-3628. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference room by calling the SEC at (800)-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site at (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.

Certain statements in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical, including statements regarding management’s intentions, beliefs, expectations, representations, plans or predictions of the future and are typically identified by words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may,” “will,” “should” and “could.” Similarly, statements that describe or contain information related to matters such as management’s intent, belief or expectation with respect to the Company’s financial performance, investment strategy and portfolio, cash flows, growth prospects, legal proceedings, amount and timing of anticipated future cash distributions, estimated per share value of the Company’s common stock and other matters are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but are the intent, belief or current expectations of the Company’s management based on their knowledge and understanding of the business and industry, the economy and other future conditions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and stockholders should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including but not limited to the factors listed and described under “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2013. These factors include, but are not limited to: market and economic challenges experienced by the U.S. economy or real estate industry as a whole, including in the lodging industry, and the local economic conditions in the markets in which the Company’s properties are located; the Company’s ability to refinance maturing debt or to obtain new financing on attractive terms; the availability of cash flow from operating activities to fund distributions; future increases in interest rates; and actions or failures by the Company’s joint venture partners including development partners. The Company intends that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results.

The following discussion and analysis relates to the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. You should read the following discussion and analysis along with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included in this report.
Overview
We continue to execute our long-term portfolio strategy by focusing our diversified assets in three specific real estate asset classes - retail, lodging and student housing. We believe this strategy presents the best opportunity to capitalize on current market trends in commercial real estate and realize income growth in these sectors. We believe that a key outcome of our strategy will be an opportunity to explore multiple liquidity events by segment.
Also part of our strategy is to improve the overall quality of our retail, lodging and student housing segments for long-term growth through selective asset acquisition and sales. We continue to use our expertise to capitalize on opportunities in the real estate industry. We believe our capacity to identify and react to investment opportunities is one of our biggest strengths. This strategy will take time as we dispose of less strategic assets and rotate capital into our targeted segments. Our focus has been, and will continue to be, maximizing stockholder value over the long-term.
During the execution of our strategy, we will focus on maintaining a stable income stream to provide a sustainable monthly distribution to our stockholders.
Our three objectives in the execution of our strategy are:
•
Sustaining a monthly stockholder distribution while maintaining capital preservation;
•
Tailoring our portfolio to lodging, student housing and retail by expanding and enhancing these growth portfolios; and
•
Positioning for stockholder liquidity through multiple liquidity events by segment type

-26-

During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we continued to maintain a sustainable distribution rate funded by our cash operations, distributions from unconsolidated entities and gains on sales of properties. We also continued disposing of assets we determined less strategic and reinvesting the capital in real estate assets that we believe will produce attractive current yields and long-term risk-adjusted returns. For our existing portfolio, our property managers for our non-lodging properties actively seek to lease space at favorable rates, control expenses, and maintain strong tenant relationships. We oversee the management of our lodging facilities through active engagement with our third party managers and franchisors to maximize occupancy and daily rates as well as control expenses.
On a consolidated basis, essentially all of our revenues and cash flows from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were generated by collecting rental payments from our tenants, room revenues from lodging properties, distributions from unconsolidated entities and dividend income earned from investments in marketable securities. Our largest cash expenses relate to the operation of our properties as well as the interest expense on our mortgages. Our property operating expenses include, but are not limited to, real estate taxes, regular repair and maintenance, management fees, utilities and insurance (some of which are recoverable). Our lodging operating expenses include, but are not limited to, rooms, food and beverage, utility, administrative and marketing, payroll, franchise and management fees and repairs and maintenance expenses.

In evaluating our financial condition and operating performance, management focuses on the following financial and non-financial indicators, discussed in further detail herein:
•
Funds from Operations (“FFO”), a supplemental non-GAAP measure to net income determined in accordance with GAAP.
•
Cash flow from operations as determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).
•
Economic and physical occupancy and rental rates.
•
Leasing activity and lease rollover.
•
Managing operating expenses.
•
Average daily room rate, revenue per available room, and average occupancy to measure our lodging properties.
•
Debt maturities and leverage ratios.
•
Liquidity levels.
During 2013, we continue to execute on our strategy of disposing less strategic assets. Through June 30, 2013, we disposed of a significant number of retail bank branches as well as a 1.5 million square feet office building. Subsequent to June 30, 2013, we sold five conventional multi-family properties and anticipate selling the remaining conventional multi-family properties in late August. In addition, on August 8, 2013, we entered into a purchase agreement to sell our core net leases assets, consisting of 294 properties in an all-cash transaction valued at approximately $2.3 billion, including the assumption of approximately $795.3 million of debt and repayment by us of approximately $360.9 million of debt. We anticipate the transaction to close in three separate closings, with the initial and second closing excepted to occur in 45 and 120 days of the execution of the purchase agreement, respectively, and the final closing to occur on or prior to May 8, 2014. This disposition activity could cause us to experience dilution in our operating performance during the period we dispose of properties and prior to our reinvestment in other properties or used to pay down our line of credit or repurchase our shares as the proceeds from disposition will be held in cash pending reinvestment.
We continue to deploy the capital into segments we believe have opportunity for higher performance, which are multi-tenant retail, lodging, and student housing. Through June 30, 2013, we have acquired six properties for approximately $234 million and plan to actively recycle the sale proceeds from recent and anticipated dispositions into acquisitions of multi-tenant retail, lodging, and student housing properties as well as paydown debt.
We have seen increased same store operating performance in our lodging and multi-family segments in the first half of 2013. The lodging industry has had positive growth for the first half of 2013 compared to 2012 and we believe it will continue for the remainder of 2013. As we continue to acquire lodging properties during the second half of the year, we expect to benefit from the industry growth and obtain increased operating performance for our lodging segment. Although we will have disposed of our conventional multi-family properties in August, we continue to have high occupancy and rental rates for our student housing portfolio. Our retail, office and industrial portfolios are expected to maintain high occupancy and have limited lease rollover in the next three years. We believe the retail and industrial segments same store income will be consistent with prior year results. We do expect to see lower income in the office segment compared to prior year results. We believe that our debt maturities over the next five years are manageable and although we believe interest rates will rise in the future, we anticipate

-27-

low interest rates to continue in 2013. We believe we will maintain our cash distribution in 2013 and anticipate distributions to be funded by cash flow from operations as well as distributions from unconsolidated entities and gains on sales of properties.
Company Highlights for the six months ended June 30, 2013
Distributions
We have paid monthly cash distributions to our stockholders which totaled in the aggregate $223.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, which was equal to $0.50 per share on an annualized basis, assuming that a share was outstanding the entire year. The distributions paid for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were funded from cash flow from operations, distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures and gains on sale of properties.
Investing Activities
Our acquisition and disposition activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 highlight our move to divesting of less strategic assets and redeploying the capital into our long-term strategic segments, lodging, student housing and multi-tenant retail. We acquired two upper upscale lodging properties consisting of 274 rooms for $70.5 million, one upscale lodging property consisting of 228 rooms for $80 million, and one student housing property of 118 beds for $15.9 million. In addition, we acquired two multi-tenant retail properties consisting of 396,778 square feet for $67.9 million. As part of our strategy to realign our asset segments with higher performing assets, we sold 223 properties for a gross disposition price of $720.8 million, including 216 retail bank branches, four office properties, two lodging properties, and one multi-family property. Additionally, we contributed 13 retail properties to the IAGM Retail Fund I, LLC joint venture for a gross disposition price of $409.3 million.
Financing Activities
We successfully refinanced approximately $608.6 million of our 2013 maturities and placed debt on new and existing properties. We were able to obtain favorable rates while still maintaining a manageable debt maturity schedule for future years. Additionally, we obtained a senior unsecured credit facility consisting of a $200 million senior unsecured revolving line of credit and a $75 million unsecured term loan. The credit facility requires monthly interest-only payments at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.60% to 2.45% on the outstanding balance of the revolver depending on leverage levels, and at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.50% to 2.45% on the outstanding balance of the term loan depending on leverage levels. As of June 30, 2013, we had $175 million available under the revolving line of credit, after withdrawing $25 million at closing. The facility will assist us in bridging the proceeds from disposing of non-strategic assets and acquiring retail, lodging and student housing assets.
As of June 30, 2013, we had mortgage debt of approximately $5.3 billion and have a weighted average interest rate of 5.10% per annum. Our debt maturities remaining for 2013 are $274.3 million. This debt bears interest at a weighted average interest rate of 5.30% per annum.
Operating Results
We experienced organic growth in our lodging and multi-family segments as our same store net operating income results increased 8.4% and 4.9%, respectively, from the six months ended June 30, 2012 to 2013. These increases are due to high occupancy and RevPAR and rental rate increases, in the lodging and multi-family segments, respectively. Our retail segment remained stable due to high occupancy rates and contractual rental rates. Our office and industrial segments have decreased slightly from prior year.
Additionally, the one luxury, eight upper-upscale, and one upscale lodging properties we have acquired since January 1, 2012 have contributed $28.5 million in lodging net operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The three student housing properties we have acquired and the three student housing properties we placed in service since January 1, 2012 have contributed $8.0 million in multi-family net operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2013.


-28-

The following table represents our same store net operating income (in thousands) for the six months ended June 30, 2013. Net operating income is calculated in our segment reporting.
 
June 30, 2013
June 30, 2012
Increase
 (decrease)
Increase
 (decrease)
Average Occupancy for period ended
June 30, 2013
Average Occupancy for period ended
June 30, 2012
Retail
$
114,535

$
114,825

$
(290
)
(0.3)%
92%
93%
Lodging
99,641

91,887

7,754

8.4%
73%
73%
Office
54,022

55,019

(997
)
(1.8)%
94%
93%
Industrial
39,628

40,190

(562
)
(1.4)%
97%
97%
Multi-Family
23,020

21,943

1,077

4.9%
93%
94%
 
$
330,846

$
323,864

$
6,982

2.2%
 
 


-29-

Results of Operations
General
Consolidated Results of Operations
This section describes and compares our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. We generate most of our net operating income from property operations. Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are stated in thousands (except per share amounts, per square foot amounts, revenue per available room and average daily rate).
 
 
Three months ended
 
Six months ended
 
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
 
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
Net loss attributable to Company
$
(32,756
)
 
$
(17,910
)
 
$
(28,270
)
 
(48,193
)
Net loss, per common share, basic and diluted
$
(0.03
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.03
)
 
(0.05
)
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we had a net loss of $32,756 and $28,270, respectively, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we had a net loss of $17,910 and $48,193. The change in net loss was primarily due to our sales of 223 properties for the six months ended June 30, 2013, in which we realized a gain on the sale of properties of $119,722. We also experienced an increase of $12,116 and $32,904 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012, in net operating income as a result of same store growth in our lodging and multi-family segments and from a full six months of operations related to our acquisitions in 2012. The increase in income was offset by an increase in provision for asset impairment of $159,155 and $169,547 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012.
A detailed discussion of our financial performance is outlined below.
Operating Income and Expenses:
 
Three months ended

2013 Increase
(decrease)
from 2012

Six months ended

2013 Increase
 (decrease)
from 2012
 
June 30, 2013
June 30, 2012


June 30, 2013
June 30, 2012

Income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Rental income
$
144,630

$
140,505

 
$
4,125

 
$
292,187

$
280,150

 
$
12,037

  Tenant recovery income
18,890

21,121

 
(2,231
)
 
39,526

40,016

 
(490
)
  Other property income
3,072

2,824

 
248

 
6,270

5,610

 
660

  Lodging income
220,878

193,135

 
27,743

 
406,028

329,736

 
76,292

Operating Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Property operating expenses
$
27,592

$
26,865

 
$
727

 
$
55,013

$
51,933

 
$
3,080

  Lodging operating expenses
137,188

121,129

 
16,059

 
261,028

212,291

 
48,737

  Real estate taxes
24,644

23,661

 
983

 
48,572

44,794

 
3,778

  Provision for asset impairment
175,612

16,457

 
159,155

 
189,544

19,997

 
169,547

  General and administrative expenses
12,786

9,434

 
3,352

 
22,937

18,306

 
4,631

  Business management fee
9,507

9,993

 
(486
)
 
19,479

19,993

 
(514
)
Property Income and Operating Expenses
Rental income for non-lodging properties consists of base monthly rent, straight-line rent adjustments, amortization of acquired above and below market leases, fee income, and percentage rental income recorded pursuant to tenant leases. Tenant recovery income consists of reimbursements from our tenants for real estate taxes, common area maintenance costs, management fees, and insurance costs. Tenant recovery income generally fluctuates correspondingly with property operating expenses and real estate taxes. Other property income for non-lodging properties consists of lease termination fees and other miscellaneous property income. Property operating expenses for non-lodging properties consist of real estate taxes, regular repair and maintenance, management fees, utilities and insurance (some of which are recoverable from the tenant).
•
Total property income (excluding lodging) increased $2,142 and $12,207 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and total net operating income increased $431 and $5,348 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012. Our multi-family segment was the main driver behind this increase, with net operating income increases of $4,834 and $9,091, for the

-30-

three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012. The increase in multi-family was the result of including a full six months of operations in 2013 for four student housing properties purchased and placed-in service in late 2012, as well as increased same store performance due to higher base rent per unit.

Lodging Income and Operating Expenses
Our lodging properties generate revenue through the rental of rooms and sales of associated food and beverage services. Lodging operating expenses include the room maintenance, food and beverage, utilities, administrative and marketing, payroll, franchise and management fees, and repairs and maintenance expenses.
•
Lodging net operating income increased $10,976 and $25,470 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012 as a result of including a full six months of operations in 2013 related to the seven hotels we acquired in 2012. These hotels were all of the upper-upscale or higher designation, which generate higher average daily rates and operating expenses than their lower-tier counterparts. Same store net operating income increased $5,039 and $7,754 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012 due to an increase in average daily rates.
Provision for Asset Impairment
•
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we identified certain properties which may have a reduction in the expected holding period and reviewed the probability that we would dispose of these assets. As part of our analysis, We identified one property in which expectations of future occupancy and leasing changed for a large single tenant office asset. We became aware of circumstances in which the tenant would reduce the space they occupied. Although the lease does not expire until 2016, we analyzed various leasing and sale scenarios for the single tenant property. Based on the probabilities assigned to such scenarios, it was determined the property was impaired and therefore, written down to fair value. As a result, we recorded a provision for asset impairment of $147,480. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we recorded a provision for asset impairment of $175,612 and $189,544, respectively, to reduce the book value of certain of our investment properties to their fair values. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we impaired certain properties of which eleven were subsequently disposed and the respective impairment charge of $7,890 is included in discontinued operations. Six of the properties previously impaired by $19,997 remain in continuing operations on the consolidated statements of operations.
General Administrative Expenses and Business Management Fee
After our stockholders have received a non-cumulative, non-compounded return of 5% per annum on their “invested capital,” we pay our business manager an annual business management fee of up to 1% of the “average invested assets,” payable quarterly in an amount equal to 0.25% of the average invested assets as of the last day of the immediately preceding quarter. Once we have satisfied the minimum return on invested capital, the amount of the actual fee paid to the business manager is requested by the business manager and approved by the board of directors up to the amount permitted by the agreement.
•
We incurred a business management fee of $19,479 and $19,993, which is equal to 0.18%, and 0.17% of average invested assets for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
•
The increase in general and administrative expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the same periods in 2012 was a result of increased legal costs as well as increased salary expenses resulting from additional personnel which is reimbursed to the business manager.



-31-

Non-Operating Income and Expenses:
 
Three months ended
 
2013 Increase
(decrease)
from 2012
 
Six months ended
 
2013 Increase
(decrease)
from 2012
 
June 30, 2013
June 30, 2012
 
 
June 30, 2013
June 30, 2012
 
Non-operating income and expenses:
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
Interest and dividend income
$
4,962

$
6,003

 
$
(1,041
)
 
$
10,193

$
10,913

 
$
(720
)
Other income
12,356

1,290

 
11,066

 
13,333

1,706

 
11,627

Interest expense
(72,273
)
(72,618
)
 
345

 
(146,106
)
(140,658
)
 
(5,448
)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
9,018

2,936

 
6,082

 
8,044

2,517

 
5,527

Gain, (loss) and (impairment) of investment in unconsolidated entities, net
(701
)
—

 
(701
)
 
(568
)
(4,200
)
 
3,632

Realized gain, (loss) and (impairment) on securities, net
16,163

(2,445
)
 
18,608

 
17,644

(1,022
)
 
18,666

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
95,919

(1,002
)
 
96,921

 
121,852

(4,115
)
 
125,967


Other Income
•
Other income increased $11,066 and $11,627 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012. The increase in other income was primarily due to the contribution of 13 multi-tenant retail properties into the the IAGM Retail Fund I, LLC joint venture. We have an equity interest in the IAGM Retail Fund I, LLC joint venture; therefore we have a continued ownership interest in the properties. As such, we treated this disposition as a partial sale, recognizing a gain on sale of $12,863, and the activity related to the disposed properties remain in continuing operations on the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income.

Interest Expense
•
Interest expense from continuing operations was $146,106 and $140,658 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Additional interest expense of $5,251 and $19,119 was reflected in discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In total, interest expense was $151,357 and $159,777 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease in interest expense of $8,420 was primarily due to the decrease in the principal amount of mortgage debt financings, which were $5,274,583 and $6,078,271 as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, as well as a decrease in the weighted average interest rate of 5.10% from 5.20% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Entities
•
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities of $9,018 and $8,044, respectively, was a result primarily due to a $9,125 gain from our share of property sales and debt extinguishment in two unconsolidated entities. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities of $2,936 and $2,517, respectively, was due to normal operations.

Realized Gain, (Loss) and (Impairment) on Securities, net
•
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, we sold various securities for a net realized gain of $16,163 and $17,644, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the loss was primarily due to a $1,899 impairment charge for an equity security offset by a net realized gain.

Discontinued Operations
•
During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we disposed of 224 and 33 properties, respectively. The activity for those properties is shown as income (loss) from discontinued operations of $121,852 and $(4,115) for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was due to a gain on sale of properties of $119,722. The loss for the six months ended June 30, 2012 included a loss on sale of properties of $2,231. The income from discontinued operations included a provision for asset impairment of $0 and $7,890 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

-32-

Segment Reporting
An analysis of results of operations by segment is below. In order to evaluate our overall portfolio, management analyzes the operating performance of all properties from period to period and properties we have owned and operated for the same period during each year. A total of 550 and 544 of our investment properties satisfied the criteria of being owned for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and are referred to herein as "same store" properties. This same store analysis allows management to monitor the operations of our existing properties for comparable periods to isolate the impact of our new acquisitions on net income. The tables contained throughout summarize certain key operating performance measures for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The rental rates reflected in retail, office, industrial, and multi-family are inclusive of rent abatements, lease inducements and straight-line rent GAAP adjustments, but exclusive of tenant improvements and lease commissions. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the costs associated with leasing space were not material. Physical occupancy is defined as the percentage of total gross leasable area actually used or occupied by a tenant. Economic occupancy is defined as the percentage of total gross leasable area for which a tenant is obligated to pay rent under the terms of its lease agreement, regardless of the actual use or occupation by that tenant of the area being leased.
Retail Segment
Our retail segment net operating income on a same store basis remained stable for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 with a decrease of $537, down to $56,788 from $57,325 for the three months ended and with a decrease of $290, down to $114,535 from $114,825 for the six months ended. On a total segment basis, we saw a decrease in total net operating income of $2,851 or 4.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to 2012 and a decrease of $98 or 0.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to 2012. This was a result of the 13 properties we contributed to the IAGM Retail Fund I, LLC joint venture. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, a full year of operations is included in net operating income, whereas for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, only operations through the disposition date in early April 2013 are included in net operating income.
Same store average economic occupancy remained consistent, although slightly decreasing, at 92% and 93% for both the three months and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
We have staggered lease expirations and expect manageable lease rollover. The percentage of leases expiring each year over the next ten years, as a percentage of annualized rent, averages less than 9%. In 2017, the percentage of leases expiring is higher than average. Of the leases expiring in 2017, 47% relate to our large portfolio of bank branches. We believe this is a manageable percentage of lease rollover.
Fundamentals in the retail segment are slowly improving. With limited new development and construction, we have a positive view of this segment long-term. Our retail portfolio strategy is to focus our capital in favorable demographic and geographic locations where rental and net operating income growth is expected. For current properties in the portfolio, we continue to maintain our expense controls and our successful property marketing programs and enhance current tenant relationships. We focus on new consumer trends and reevaluate tenant synergy as leases mature to guarantee proper tenant diversity at our properties.
 
Total Retail Properties
 
As of June 30
 
2013
2012
Physical occupancy
91%
92%
Economic occupancy
92%
93%
Rent per square foot
$14.35
$14.20
Investment in properties, before depreciation
$3,317,692
$3,609,108









The following table represents lease expirations for the retail segment:

-33-

Lease Expiration Year
Number of Expiring Leases
GLA of Expiring Leases (Sq. Ft.)
Annualized Rent of Expiring Leases ($)
Percent of Total GLA
Percent of Total Annualized Rent
Expiring Rent/Square Foot
2013
195
662,809

9,728

3.7
%
3.8
%
14.68

2014
284
1,840,848

25,693

10.3
%
10.1
%
13.96

2015
343
2,319,729

28,697

13.0
%
11.2
%
12.37

2016
295
1,740,030

24,612

9.7
%
9.6
%
14.14

2017
555
2,834,223

57,933

15.9
%
22.7
%
20.44

2018
227
1,789,760

25,690

10.0
%
10.1
%
14.35

2019
94
1,599,946

18,869

9.0
%
7.4
%
11.79

2020
52
807,254

10,928

4.5
%
4.3
%
13.54

2021
46
538,231

6,938

3.0
%
2.7
%
12.89

2022
44
802,954

10,002

4.5
%
3.9
%
12.46

Thereafter
125
2,912,323

36,394

16.3
%
14.3
%
12.50


2,260
17,848,107

255,484

100
%
100
%
14.31


Comparison of three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
The table below represents operating information for the retail segment and for the same store retail segment consisting of properties acquired prior to April 1, 2012. The properties in the same store portfolio were owned for the entire three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
 
For the three months ended June 30, 2013
 
For the three months ended June 30, 2012
 
Same Store Portfolio Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Total Segment Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Amount
%
 
Amount
%
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
62,303

$
3,147

$
65,450

 
$
62,602

$
6,300

$
68,902

 
$
(299
)
(0.5
)%
 
$
(3,452
)
(5.0
)%
Straight line adjustment
1,203

583

1,786

 
1,350

281

1,631

 
(147
)
(10.9
)%
 
155

9.5
 %
Tenant recovery income
15,888

1,195

17,083

 
15,687

2,387

18,074

 
201

1.3
 %
 
(991
)
(5.5
)%
Other property income
915

6

921

 
1,427

12

1,439

 
(512
)
(35.9
)%
 
(518
)
(36.0
)%
Total revenues
80,309

4,931

85,240

 
81,066

8,980

90,046

 
(757
)
(0.9
)%
 
(4,806
)
(5.3
)%
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating expenses
13,151

859

14,010

 
14,191

1,766

15,957

 
1,040

7.3
 %
 
1,947

12.2
 %
Real estate taxes
10,370

472

10,842

 
9,550

1,300

10,850

 
(820
)
(8.6
)%
 
8

0.1
 %
Total operating expenses
23,521

1,331

24,852

 
23,741

3,066

26,807

 
220

0.9
 %
 
1,955

7.3
 %
Net operating income
$
56,788

$
3,600

$
60,388

 
$
57,325

$
5,914

$
63,239

 
$
(537
)
(0.9
)%
 
$
(2,851
)
(4.5
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average occupancy for the period
92%
N/A
92%
 
93%
N/A
93%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of Properties
358
3
361
 
358
1
359
 
 
 
 
 
 

Comparison of six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
The table below represents operating information for the retail segment and for the same store retail segment consisting of properties acquired prior to January 1, 2012. The properties in the same store portfolio were owned for the entire six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

-34-

 
For the six months ended
June 30, 2013
 
For the six months ended
June 30, 2012
 
Same Store Portfolio Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Total Segment Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Amount
%
 
Amount
%
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
124,428

$
11,945

$
136,373

 
$
124,987

$
12,551

$
137,538

 
$
(559
)
(0.4
)%
 
$
(1,165
)
(0.8
)%
Straight line adjustment
2,420

960

3,380

 
2,465

621

3,086

 
(45
)
(1.8
)%
 
294

9.5
 %
Tenant recovery income
30,893

4,162

35,055

 
30,433

4,302

34,735

 
460

1.5
 %
 
320

0.9
 %
Other property income
2,362

(28
)
2,334

 
2,015

61

2,076

 
347

17.2
 %
 
258

12.4
 %
Total revenues
160,103

17,039

177,142

 
159,900

17,535

177,435

 
203

0.1
 %
 
(293
)
(0.2
)%
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating expenses
25,877

2,761

28,638

 
26,297

3,331

29,628

 
420

1.6
 %
 
990

3.3
 %
Real estate taxes
19,691

2,214

21,905

 
18,778

2,332

21,110

 
(913
)
(4.9
)%
 
(795
)
(3.8
)%
Total operating expenses
45,568

4,975

50,543

 
45,075

5,663

50,738

 
(493
)
(1.1
)%
 
195

0.4
 %
Net operating income
$
114,535

$
12,064

$
126,599

 
$
114,825

$
11,872

$
126,697

 
$
(290
)
(0.3
)%
 
$
(98
)
(0.1
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average occupancy for the period
92%
N/A
92%
 
93%
N/A
93%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of Properties
357
4
361
 
357
2
359
 
 
 
 
 
 




Lodging Segment
We measure our financial performance for lodging properties by revenue generated per available room known as RevPAR, which is an operational measure commonly used in the lodging industry to evaluate lodging performance. RevPAR represents the product of the average daily rate, or "ADR", charged and the average daily occupancy achieved but excludes other revenue generated by a hotel property, such as food and beverage, parking, telephone and other guest service revenues.
On a same store basis, net operating income increased 7.9% and 8.4% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 to 2013 from $63,920 to $68,959 and $91,887 to $99,641, respectively. This was a result of increased RevPar of $103 to $109 for the three months ended and $94 to $100 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Also, ADR increased from $134 to $141 for the three months ended and from $130 to $137 for the six months ended, as occupancy remained consistent for the periods. On a total segment basis, lodging's net operating income increased $10,976 or 17.2% and $25,470 or 24.8% when comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, to the same periods in 2012. The large increase in net operating income was a result of a full six months of operations related to our seven hotel acquisitions in 2012 and three hotel acquisitions in 2013, which were all in the luxury, upper-upscale, or upscale designation. These hotels contributed to the total segment increase in RevPar of $95 to $103 and ADR of $131 to $141 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 to 2013.
We are optimistic our lodging portfolio will continue its strong performance for the remainder of 2013. We believe business and leisure travel will remain strong in 2013 with leisure demand continuing to be active, but price sensitive and group travel demand to be flat although at a healthy level. We also expect supply growth to remain below historical levels for the next couple of years, which will also help support the fundamentals for the lodging segment. We believe our RevPar will increase consistent with industry expectations and by upgrading our asset base through strategic acquisitions.

-35-

 
Total Lodging Properties
 
As of June 30
 
2013
2012
Revenue per available room
$103
$95
Average daily rate
$141
$131
Occupancy
73%
73%
Investment in properties, before depreciation
$3,453,103
$3,102,846

Comparison of three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
The table below represents operating information for the lodging segment and for the same store portfolio for properties acquired prior to April 1, 2012. The properties in the same store portfolio were owned for the entire three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
 
For the three months ended
June 30, 2013
 
For the three months ended
 June 30, 2012
 
Same Store Portfolio Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Total Segment Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Amount
%
 
Amount
%
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lodging operating  income
$
201,722

$
19,156

$
220,878

 
$
193,135

$
—

$
193,135

 
$
8,587

4.4
 %
 
$
27,743

14.4
 %
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lodging operating expenses
124,471

12,716

137,187

 
121,129

—

121,129

 
(3,342
)
(2.8
)%
 
(16,058
)
(13.3
)%
Real estate taxes
8,292

503

8,795

 
8,086

—

8,086

 
(206
)
(2.5
)%
 
(709
)
(8.8
)%
Total operating expenses
132,763

13,219

145,982

 
129,215

—

129,215

 
(3,548
)
(2.7
)%
 
(16,767
)
(13.0
)%
Net operating income
$
68,959

$
5,937

$
74,896

 
$
63,920

$
—

$
63,920

 
$
5,039

7.9
 %
 
$
10,976

17.2
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average occupancy for the period
77%
N/A
78%
 
77%
N/A
77%
 




 




Number of properties
84
5
89
 
84
—
84
 




 




Room Rev Par
$109
N/A
$111
 
$103
N/A
$103
 




 




Average Daily Rate
$141
N/A
$143
 
$134
N/A
$134
 




 






-36-

Comparison of six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
The table below represents operating information for the lodging segment and for the same store portfolio for properties acquired prior to January 1, 2012. The properties in the same store portfolio were owned for the entire six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
 
For the six months ended
June 30, 2013
 
For the six months ended
 June 30, 2012
 
Same Store Portfolio Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Total Segment Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Amount
%
 
Amount
%
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lodging operating  income
$
302,682

$
103,346

$
406,028

 
$
289,544

$
40,192

$
329,736

 
$
13,138

4.5
 %
 
$
76,292

23.1
 %
Expenses:






 






 




 




Lodging operating expenses
$
189,208

$
71,820

$
261,028

 
$
183,985

$
28,307

$
212,292

 
$
(5,223
)
(2.8
)%
 
$
(48,736
)
(23.0
)%
Real estate taxes
13,833

3,052

16,885

 
13,672

1,127

14,799

 
(161
)
(1.2
)%
 
(2,086
)
(14.1
)%
Total operating expenses
$
203,041

$
74,872

$
277,913

 
$
197,657

$
29,434

$
227,091

 
$
(5,384
)
(2.7
)%
 
$
(50,822
)
(22.4
)%
Net operating income
$
99,641

$
28,474

$
128,115

 
$
91,887

$
10,758

$
102,645

 
$
7,754

8.4
 %
 
$
25,470

24.8
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average occupancy for the period
73%
N/A
73%
 
73%
N/A
73%
 




 




Number of properties
79
10
89
 
79
5
84
 




 




Room Rev Par
$100
N/A
$103
 
$94
N/A
$95
 




 




Average Daily Rate
$137
N/A
$141
 
$130
N/A
$131
 




 






Office Segment
Our office segment has remained consistent on a total segment and same store basis. Total segment and same store net operating income decreased by 1.8% from $55,019 to $54,022 from the six months ended June 30, 2012 to 2013. The stabilization of our office portfolio was due to consistent occupancies as well as steady rental rates over the periods.

We expect market rates to decrease from the current rates as office tenants continue to downsize not only their workforce, but also the space they provide for their employees. The lease expirations reflected in 2016 and 2017 substantially consist of two properties, AT&T in Hoffman Estates, Illinois, which is located in the greater metro Chicago market and AT&T in St. Louis, Missouri. These leases represent 71% of the 2016 lease expirations or approximately 1.7 million square feet and 73% of the 2017 lease expirations or approximately 1.5 million square feet, respectively.
 
Total Office Properties
 
As of June 30
 
2013
2012
Physical occupancy
94%
93%
Economic occupancy
94%
93%
Rent per square foot
$15.15
$15.01
Investment in properties, before depreciation
$1,321,004
$1,574,384






The following table represents lease expirations for the office segment:

-37-

Lease Expiration Year
Number of Expiring Leases
GLA of Expiring Leases (Sq. Ft.)
Annualized Rent of Expiring Leases ($)
Percent of Total GLA
Percent of Total Annualized Rent
Expiring Rent/Square Foot ($)
2013
5
394,626

4,360

5.0
%
3.6
%
11.05

2014
3
10,482

216

0.1
%
0.2
%
20.61

2015
6
88,971

2,428

1.1
%
2.0
%
27.29

2016
8
2,174,340

33,047

27.3
%
27.4
%
15.20

2017
13
1,797,326

22,193

22.6
%
18.4
%
12.35

2018
6
270,352

7,050

3.4
%
5.8
%
26.08

2019
4
685,426

9,166

8.6
%
7.6
%
13.37

2020
2
412,074

3,642

5.2
%
3.0
%
8.84

2021
7
1,270,322

18,075

16.0
%
15.0
%
14.23

2022
4
90,338

1,997

1.1
%
1.7
%
22.11

Thereafter
3
759,196

18,427

9.5
%
15.3
%
24.27


61
7,953,453

120,601

100
%
100
%
15.16


Comparison of three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
The table below represents operating information for the office segment and for the same store segment consisting of properties acquired prior to April 1, 2012. The properties in the same store portfolio were owned for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
 
For the three months ended June 30, 2013
 
For the three months ended June 30, 2012
 
Same Store Portfolio Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Total Segment Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Amount
%
 
Amount
%
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
29,677

$
—

$
29,677

 
$
29,526

$
—

$
29,526

 
$
151

0.5
 %
 
$
151

0.5
 %
Straight line adjustment
789

—

789

 
815

—

815

 
(26
)
(3.2
)%
 
(26
)
(3.2
)%
Tenant recovery  income
1,207

—

1,207

 
1,783

—

1,783

 
(576
)
(32.3
)%
 
(576
)
(32.3
)%
Other property  income
50

—

50

 
47

—

47

 
3

6.4
 %
 
3

6.4
 %
Total revenues
31,723

—

31,723

 
32,171

—

32,171

 
(448
)
(1.4
)%
 
(448
)
(1.4
)%
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating  expenses
3,469

—

3,469

 
2,892

—

2,892

 
(577
)
(20.0
)%
 
(577
)
(20.0
)%
Real estate taxes
1,440

—

1,440

 
1,510

—

1,510

 
70

4.6
 %
 
70

4.6
 %
Total operating expenses
4,909

—

4,909

 
4,402

—

4,402

 
(507
)
(11.5
)%
 
(507
)
(11.5
)%
Net operating  income
$
26,814

$
—

$
26,814

 
$
27,769

$
—

$
27,769

 
$
(955
)
(3.4
)%
 
$
(955
)
(3.4
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average occupancy for the period
94%
N/A
94%
 
93%
N/A
93%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of Properties
34
—
34
 
34
—
34
 
 
 
 
 
 

-38-

Comparison of six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
The table below represents operating information for the office segment and for the same store segment consisting of properties acquired prior to January 1, 2012. The properties in the same store portfolio were owned for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2013
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2012
 
Same Store Portfolio Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Total Segment Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Amount
%
 
Amount
%
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
59,279

$
—

$
59,279

 
$
59,037

$
—

$
59,037

 
$
242

0.4
 %
 
$
242

0.4
 %
Straight line adjustment
1,446

—

1,446

 
1,534

—

1,534

 
(88
)
(5.7
)%
 
(88
)
(5.7
)%
Tenant recovery  income
2,991

—

2,991

 
3,473

—

3,473

 
(482
)
(13.9
)%
 
(482
)
(13.9
)%
Other property  income
97

—

97

 
254

—

254

 
(157
)
(61.8
)%
 
(157
)
(61.8
)%
Total revenues
63,813

—

63,813

 
64,298

—

64,298

 
(485
)
(0.8
)%
 
(485
)
(0.8
)%
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating  expenses
6,894

—

6,894

 
6,273

—

6,273

 
(621
)
(9.9
)%
 
(621
)
(9.9
)%
Real estate taxes
2,897

—

2,897

 
3,006

—

3,006

 
109

3.6
 %
 
109

3.6
 %
Total operating expenses
9,791

—

9,791

 
9,279

—

9,279

 
(512
)
(5.5
)%
 
(512
)
(5.5
)%
Net operating  income
$
54,022

$
—

$
54,022

 
$
55,019

$
—

$
55,019

 
$
(997
)
(1.8
)%
 
$
(997
)
(1.8
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average occupancy for the period
94%
N/A
94%
 
93%
N/A
93%
 


 


Number of Properties
34
—
34
 
34
—
34
 


 




Industrial Segment
Our industrial segment net operating income decreased slightly by $562 or 1.4% when comparing the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Our industrial segment base rent per square foot has remained consistent for the six months ended June 30, 2013 to 2012.
Our industrial properties' economic occupancy rates remained consistent at 97% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. The percentage of leases expiring each year over the next ten years, as a percentage of annualized rent, averages approximately 6%. We believe this is a manageable percentage of lease rollover.
Rental rates are expected to remain consistent in 2013 for our specialty distribution centers as well as our charter schools and correctional facilities and slightly increase for our distribution centers.
 
Total Industrial Properties
 
As of June 30
 
2013
2012
Physical occupancy
96%
96%
Economic occupancy
97%
97%
Rent per square foot
$6.47
$6.31
Investment in properties, before depreciation
$970,490
$979,042


-39-

The following table represents lease expirations for the industrial segment:
Lease Expiration Year
Number of Expiring Leases
GLA of Expiring Leases (Sq. Ft.)
Annualized Rent of Expiring Leases ($)
Percent of Total GLA
Percent of Total Annualized Rent
Expiring Rent/ Square Foot ($)
2013
3
301,291

2,705

2.4
%
3.3
%
8.98

2014
4
454,423

2,563

3.6
%
3.1
%
5.64

2015
5
1,308,736

5,044

10.3
%
6.2
%
3.85

2016
4
1,367,801

4,877

10.8
%
6.0
%
3.57

2017
4
888,749

5,162

7.0
%
6.3
%
5.81

2018
1
175,052

646

1.4
%
0.8
%
3.69

2019
1
43,500

113

0.3
%
0.1
%
2.60

2020
1
301,029

9,850

2.4
%
12.1
%
32.72

2021
4
1,049,486

5,849

8.3
%
7.2
%
5.57

2022
8
2,402,681

15,290

18.9
%
18.7
%
6.36

Thereafter
20
4,404,306

29,592

34.7
%
36.2
%
6.72


55
12,697,054

81,691

100
%
100
%
6.43


Comparison of three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
The table below represents operating information for the industrial segment and for the same store segment consisting of properties acquired prior to April 1, 2012. The properties in the same store segment were owned for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

 
For the three months ended
 June 30, 2013
 
For the three months ended
June 30, 2012
 
Same Store Portfolio Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Total Segment Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Amount
%
 
Amount
%
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
20,440

$
—

$
20,440

 
$
20,164

$
—

$
20,164

 
$
276

1.4
 %
 
$
276

1.4
 %
Straight line adjustment
284

—

284

 
620

—

620

 
(336
)
(54.2
)%
 
(336
)
(54.2
)%
Tenant recovery income
469

—

469

 
1,101

—

1,101

 
(632
)
(57.4
)%
 
(632
)
(57.4
)%
Other property income
78

—

78

 
(179
)
—

(179
)
 
257

(143.6
)%
 
257

(143.6
)%
Total revenues
21,271

—

21,271

 
21,706

—

21,706

 
(435
)
(2.0
)%
 
(435
)
(2.0
)%
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating expenses
807

—

807

 
916

—

916

 
109

11.9
 %
 
109

11.9
 %
Real estate taxes
608

—

608

 
1,046

—

1,046

 
438

41.9
 %
 
$
438

41.9
 %
Total operating expenses
1,415

—

1,415

 
1,962

—

1,962

 
547

27.9
 %
 
547

27.9
 %
Net operating income
$
19,856

$
—

$
19,856

 
$
19,744

$
—

$
19,744

 
$
112

0.6
 %
 
$
112

0.6
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average  occupancy for the period
97%
N/A
97%
 
97%
N/A
97%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of Properties
53
—
53
 
53
—
53
 
 
 
 
 
 









-40-

Comparison of six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
The table below represents operating information for the industrial segment and for the same store segment consisting of properties acquired prior to January 1, 2012. The properties in the same store segment were owned for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

 
For the six months ended
 June 30, 2013
 
For the six months ended
June 30, 2012
 
Same Store Portfolio Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Total Segment Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Amount
%
 
Amount
%
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
40,376

$
—

$
40,376

 
$
40,405

$
—

$
40,405

 
$
(29
)
(0.1
)%
 
$
(29
)
(0.1
)%
Straight line adjustment
737

—

737

 
1,182

—

1,182

 
(445
)
(37.6
)%
 
(445
)
(37.6
)%
Tenant recovery income
1,190

—

1,190

 
1,560



1,560

 
(370
)
(23.7
)%
 
(370
)
(23.7
)%
Other property income
104

—

104

 
311

—

311

 
(207
)
(66.6
)%
 
(207
)
(66.6
)%
Total revenues
42,407

—

42,407

 
43,458

—

43,458

 
(1,051
)
(2.4
)%
 
(1,051
)
(2.4
)%
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating expenses
1,599

—

1,599

 
1,778

—

1,778

 
179

10.1
 %
 
179

10.1
 %
Real estate taxes
1,180

—

1,180

 
1,490



1,490

 
310

20.8
 %
 
$
310

20.8
 %
Total operating expenses
2,779

—

2,779

 
3,268

—

3,268

 
489

15.0
 %
 
489

15.0
 %
Net operating income
$
39,628

$
—

$
39,628

 
$
40,190

$
—

$
40,190

 
$
(562
)
(1.4
)%
 
$
(562
)
(1.4
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average  occupancy for the period
97%
N/A
97%
 
97%
N/A
97%
 


 


Number of Properties
53
—
53
 
53
—
53
 


 




Multi-family Segment
Our multi-family segment continues to perform well as net operating income increased $4,834 or 43% and $9,091 or 41% on a total segment basis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012. The increase was primarily driven by additional properties in our portfolio. We purchased two and placed in service two student housing properties in late 2012 and purchased one student housing property during the first quarter of 2013. We also placed in service one student housing property and one conventional apartment in the second quarter of 2013. Additionally, same store net operating income increased $411 or 3.7% and $1,077 or 4.9% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2012, due to higher base rent per unit. We believe these increases were a result of the single family housing market downturn and limited availability of credit for new or existing homeowners, which drove demand to multi-family apartments across the nation.
As we dispose of our conventional multi-family properties, we focus on growing our student housing portfolio through property acquisitions and development. Our rental rates in student housing rose significantly in 2013 compared to 2012 while occupancy remained consistent between periods for nearly all of our properties. We expect rental rates to maintain or slightly increase throughout 2013. Our rental rates have increased due to favorable market conditions as well as the addition of five student housing properties in 2012 and 2013. The June 30, 2013 ending economic occupancy of 85% is due to a student housing project consisting of 1,189 beds being placed in service. We project our occupancy to increase in the third quarter of 2013 when the school year begins. The project is already substantially pre-leased.

-41-

 
Total Multi-family Properties
 
As of June 30
 
2013
2012
Economic occupancy
85%
93%
End of month scheduled rent per multi-family unit per month
$1,014
$971
End of month scheduled rent per student housing bed per month
$698
$666
Investment in properties, before depreciation
$1,074,129
$688,658

Comparison of three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
The table below represents operating information for the multi-family segment and for the same store portfolio consisting of properties acquired prior to April 1, 2012. The properties in the same store portfolio were owned for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
 
For the three months ended
June 30, 2013
 
For the three months ended June 30, 2012
 
Same Store Portfolio Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Total Segment Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Amount
%
 
Amount
%
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental income
$
19,471

$
5,970

$
25,441

 
$
18,794

$
—

$
18,794

 
$
677

3.6
 %
 
$
6,647

35.4
 %
Straight line adjustment
36

727

763

 
53

—

53

 
(17
)
(32.1
)%
 
710

1,339.6
 %
Tenant recovery income
125

6

131

 
163

—

163

 
(38
)
(23.3
)%
 
(32
)
(19.6
)%
Other property income
1,702

321

2,023

 
1,517

—

1,517

 
185

12.2
 %
 
506

33.4
 %
Total revenues
21,334

7,024

28,358

 
20,527

—

20,527

 
807

3.9
 %
 
7,831

38.1
 %
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property operating expenses
7,609

1,699

9,308

 
7,099

—

7,099

 
(510
)
(7.2
)%
 
(2,209
)
(31.1
)%
Real estate taxes
2,056

902

2,958

 
2,170

—

2,170

 
114

5.3
 %
 
(788
)
(36.3
)%
Total operating expenses
9,665

2,601

12,266

 
9,269

—

9,269

 
(396
)
(4.3
)%
 
(2,997
)
(32.3
)%
Net operating  income
$
11,669

$
4,423

$
16,092

 
$
11,258

$
—

$
11,258

 
$
411

3.7
 %
 
$
4,834

42.9
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average occupancy  for the period
93%
N/A
85%
 
94%
N/A
94%
 


 


Number of Properties
21
7
28
 
21
—
21
 


 



Comparison of six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
The table below represents operating information for the multi-family segment and for the same store portfolio consisting of properties acquired prior to January 1, 2012. The properties in the same store portfolio were owned for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

-42-

 
For the six months ended
June 30, 2013
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2012
 
Same Store Portfolio Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Total Segment Change Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Same Store Segment
Non-Same Store
Total Segment
 
Amount
%
 
Amount
%
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Rental income
$
38,552

$
11,232

$
49,784

 
$
37,209

$
—

$
37,209

 
$
1,343

3.6
 %
 
$
12,575

33.8
 %
  Straight line adjustment
75

737

812

 
159

—

159

 
(84
)
(52.8
)%
 
653

410.7
 %
  Tenant recovery income
284

6

290

 
248



248

 
36

14.5
 %
 
42

16.9
 %
  Other property income
3,156

579

3,735

 
2,969

—

2,969

 
187

6.3
 %
 
766

25.8
 %
Total revenues
42,067

12,554

54,621

 
40,585

—

40,585

 
1,482

3.7
 %
 
14,036

34.6
 %
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Property operating  expenses
14,890

2,992

17,882

 
14,255

—

14,255

 
(635
)
(4.5
)%
 
(3,627
)
(25.4
)%
  Real estate taxes
4,157

1,548

5,705

 
4,387

—

4,387

 
230

5.2
 %
 
(1,318
)
(30.0
)%
Total operating expenses
19,047

4,540

23,587

 
18,642

—

18,642

 
(405
)
(2.2
)%
 
(4,945
)
(26.5
)%
Net operating  income
$
23,020

$
8,014

$
31,034

 
$
21,943

$
—

$
21,943

 
$
1,077

4.9
 %
 
$
9,091

41.4
 %
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average occupancy  for the period
93%
N/A
85%
 
94%
N/A
94%
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of Properties
21
7
28
 
21
—
21
 
 
 
 
 
 
Developments
We have development projects that are in various stages of pre-development and development which are funded by borrowings secured by the properties and our equity. Specifically identifiable direct development and construction costs are capitalized, including, where applicable, salaries and related costs, real estate taxes and interest incurred in developing the property. These developments encompass the retail and multi-family segments.
The properties under development and all amounts set forth below are as of June 30, 2013. (Dollar amounts stated in thousands.)
Name
Location
(City, State)
Property Type
SF / Units / Beds
Total Costs
Incurred to
Date ($) (a)
Total
Estimated
Costs ($)
(b)
Remaining Costs to be
Funded by
Inland
American (c)
Note
Payable as
of
June 30, 2013
Estimated
Placed in
Service Date
(d) (e)
Woodbridge
Wylie, TX
Retail
519,745
$
44,932

$
69,019

—

$
18,110

(f)
UH at Charlotte
Charlotte, NC
Student Housing
670 beds
6,119

44,243

9,187

1

Q3 2015
UH at Arena District (g)
Eugene, OR
Student Housing
244 beds
11,337

20,685

1,174

2,912

Q3 2013
(a)
The Total Costs Incurred to Date represent total costs incurred for the development, including any costs allocated to parcels placed in service, but excluding capitalized interest.
(b)
The Total Estimated Costs represent 100% of the development’s estimated costs, including the acquisition cost of the land and building, if any, and excluding capitalized interest. The Total Estimated Costs are subject to change upon, or prior to, the completion of the development and include amounts required to lease the property.
(c)
We anticipate funding remaining development, to the extent any remains, through construction financing secured by the properties and equity contributions.
(d)
The Estimated Placed in Service Date represents the date the certificate of occupancy is currently anticipated to be obtained. Subsequent to obtaining the certificate of occupancy, each property will go through a lease-up period.
(e)
Leasing activities related to student housing properties do not begin until six to nine months prior to the placed in service date.
(f)
Woodbridge is a retail shopping center and development is planned to be completed in phases. As the construction and lease-up of individual phases are completed, the respective phase will be placed in service resulting in a range of

-43-

estimated placed in service dates through 2016. Of the costs incurred to date, $30,292 relates to phases that have been placed in service as of June 30, 2013.
(g)
University House at Arena District is an unconsolidated entity.
As part of our restructure of, and foreclosure of the properties securing, the Stan Thomas Properties note, we, as the secured lender, began overseeing certain roadway and utility infrastructure projects that will provide access to the 240 acre Sacramento Railyards property. The Railyards property is located immediately adjacent to, and to the north of, Sacramento’s central business district. The infrastructure projects were planned, approved and funded prior to the foreclosure. The Railyards property is the subject of a collaborative planning and infrastructure funding effort of various federal, state and local municipalities, and its development is scheduled to be completed in phases during the years 2013-2030. We are currently engaged in efforts to either sell parcels within the Railyards or to sell the entire property to a master developer. The current book value, excluding capitalized interest, of the Railyards property is $117,159 as of June 30, 2013.


-44-

Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2013, we had $295.9 million of cash and cash equivalents. We continually evaluate the economic and credit environment and its impact on our business. Maintaining significant capital reserves has become a priority. We believe we are appropriately positioned to have significant cash to utilize in executing our strategy.

Short Term Liquidity and Capital Resources
On a short term basis, our principal demands for funds are to pay our corporate and property operating expenses, as well as property capital expenditures, make distributions to our stockholders, and pay interest and principal payments on our current indebtedness. We expect to meet our short term liquidity requirements from cash flow from operations, proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan and distributions from our joint venture investments.

Long Term Liquidity and Capital Resources
On a long term basis, our objectives are to maximize revenue generated by our existing properties, to further enhance the value of our segments that produce attractive current yield and long-term risk-adjusted returns to our stockholders and to generate sustainable and predictable cash flow from our operations to distribute to our stockholders. We believe the increased performance of our lodging and multi-family segments as well as the repositioning of our retail and lodging properties will increase our operating cash flows. To assist us in managing the timing of the cash flow from disposing of non-strategic properties and acquiring retail, lodging and student housing properties, we have obtained a senior unsecured credit facility consisting of a $200 million senior unsecured revolving line of credit and a $75 million unsecured term loan. Upon closing the credit agreement, we borrowed the full amount of the term loan. As of June 30, 2013, we had $175 million available under the revolving line of credit, after drawing $25 million at closing.
Our principal demands for funds will be:
•
to pay our expenses and the operating expenses of our properties;
•
to make distributions to our stockholders;
•
to service or pay-down our debt;
•
to fund capital expenditures;
•
to invest in properties;
•
to fund joint ventures and development investments; and
•
to fund our share repurchase program.
Generally, our cash needs will be funded from:
•
income earned on our investment properties;
•
interest income on investments and dividend and gain on sale income earned on our investment in marketable securities;
•
distributions from our joint venture investments;
•
proceeds from sales of properties;
•
proceeds from borrowings on properties; and
•
issuance of shares under our distribution reinvestment plan.
Distributions
We declared cash distributions to our stockholders per weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period from January 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013 totaling $223.8 million or $0.50 per share on an annualized basis, including amounts reinvested through the distribution reinvestment plan. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, we paid cash distributions of $223.3 million. These cash distributions were paid with $211.1 million from our cash flow from operations, $9.1 million provided by distributions from unconsolidated entities, as well as $132.9 million from gain on sales of properties.
We continue to provide cash distributions to our stockholders from cash generated by our operations. The following chart summarizes the sources of our cash used to pay distributions. Our primary source of cash is cash flow provided by operating activities from our investments as presented in our cash flow statement. Distributions from unconsolidated entities is another source of cash that is generated from real estate operations. Gain on sales of properties relate to net profits from the sale of certain properties. Our

-45-

presentation below is not intended to be an alternative to our consolidated statements of cash flow and does not present all the sources and uses of our cash.

The following chart presents a historical view of our distribution coverage. (Dollar amounts stated in thousands.)
 
Six months ended
 
Twelve months ended
 
June 30, 2013
 
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
Cash flow provided by operations
$
211,106

 
$
456,221

397,949

356,660

369,031

384,365

Distributions from unconsolidated entities
$
9,149

 
$
31,710

33,954

31,737

32,081

41,704

Gain on sales of properties (1)
132,937

 
$
40,691

6,141

55,412

—

—

Distributions declared
$
(223,781
)
 
$
(440,031
)
(429,599
)
(417,885
)
(405,337
)
(418,694
)
Excess (deficiency)
$
129,411

 
$
88,591

8,445

25,924

(4,225
)
7,375

 
Three months ended
Three months ended
 
Six months ended
 
March 31, 2013
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2013
Cash flow provided by operations
$
94,063

$
117,043

 
$
211,106

Distributions from unconsolidated entities
2,529

6,620

 
9,149

Gain on sales of properties (1)
23,909

109,028

 
132,937

Distributions declared
(111,569
)
(112,212
)
 
(223,781
)
Excess (deficiency)
$
8,932

$
120,479

 
$
129,411


 
Three months ended
Three months ended
 
Six months ended
 
March 31, 2012
June 30, 2012
 
June 30, 2012
Cash flow provided by operations
$
85,925

$
156,846

 
$
242,771

Distributions from unconsolidated entities
3,093

6,342

 
9,435

Gain on sales of properties (1)
—

1,851

 
1,851

Distributions declared
(109,217
)
(109,641
)
 
(218,858
)
Excess (deficiency)
$
(20,199
)
$
55,398

 
$
35,199


(1) Excludes gains reflected on impaired values and excludes loss on transfer of assets. For the six months June 30, 2013, includes gain on sale of properties of $12,863 recognized in other income on the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income, for the contribution of properties to the IAGM Retail Fund I, LLC joint venture.
Our cash flow from operations in the first quarter is typically our lowest of the year due to the seasonality of our lodging portfolio and a large portion of real estate taxes paid in the first quarter. We expect our cash flow from operations to increase during the remainder of the year consistent with historical trends which typically generates higher revenue and operating income during second and third quarters. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, we saw decrease of approximately $10 million in the amount of prepaid rent compared to 2012 due to the timing of receipts. In addition, for the six months ended June 30, 2012, cash flow from operations included an increase in accrued interest expense payable of $22,100. This was a result of a one-time change in timing of debt service payments from 2011 to 2012.

The following table presents a historical summary of distributions declared, distributions paid and distributions reinvested.
 
Six months ended June 30,
 
Twelve months ended December 31,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2012
 
2011
 
2010
 
2009
 
2008
Distributions declared
$
223,782

 
218,858

 
$
440,031

 
429,599

 
417,885

 
405,337

 
418,694

Distributions paid
$
223,353

 
218,433

 
$
439,188

 
428,650

 
416,935

 
411,797

 
405,925

Distributions reinvested
$
91,371

 
97,571

 
$
191,785

 
199,591

 
207,296

 
231,306

 
242,113


Acquisitions and Dispositions of Real Estate Investments
We acquired six and seven properties during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which were funded with available cash, disposition proceeds, mortgage indebtedness, and the proceeds from the distribution reinvestment plan. We invested net

-46-

cash of approximately $205.3 million and $211.0 million for these acquisitions. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we sold 223 properties, including 216 bank branches, two hotels, four office buildings, and a multi-family property, generating net sales proceeds of $780.5 million. We also contributed 13 retail properties to the IAGM joint venture. Comparatively, during the six months ended June 30, 2012, we sold 33 properties, including 30 bank branches, two retail properties, and one industrial property, generating net sales proceeds of $104.6 million.
Stock Offering
We have completed two public offerings of our common stock as well as a public offering of common stock under our distribution reinvestment plan, or “DRP.” On March 16, 2011, we commenced a new public offering of shares of common stock under our DRP, pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3 filed under the Securities Act. The purchase price under the DRP is currently equal to $6.93 per share. We are permitted to offer shares pursuant to the DRP until the earlier of March 16, 2015 or the date we sell all $803.0 million worth of shares in the offering. We may also file a new registration statement to continue offering shares under the DRP. As of June 30, 2013, we had raised a total of approximately $8.8 billion of gross offering proceeds as a result of all of our offerings (inclusive of distribution reinvestments and net of redemptions).
During the six months ended June 30, 2013, we sold a total of 13.2 million shares and generated $91.4 million in gross offering proceeds under the DRP, as compared to 13.5 million shares and $97.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012. Our average distribution reinvestment plan participation was 41% for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to 45% for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
Share Repurchase Program
Our board adopted an Amended and Restated Share Repurchase Program, which was effective from April 11, 2011 through January 31, 2012 (the “First Amended Program”). Our board subsequently adopted a Second Amended and Restated Share Repurchase Program, which became effective as of February 1, 2012 (the “Second Amended Program”).
Under the Second Amended Program, we may repurchase shares of our common stock, on a quarterly basis, from the beneficiary of a stockholder that has died or from stockholders that have a “qualifying disability” or are confined to a “long-term care facility” (together, referred to herein as “hardship repurchases”). We are authorized to repurchase shares at a price per share equal to 100% of the most recently disclosed estimated per share value of our common stock, which currently is equal to $6.93 per share. Our obligation to repurchase any shares under the Second Amended Program is conditioned upon our having sufficient funds available to complete the repurchase. Our board has initially reserved $10.0 million per calendar quarter for the purpose of funding repurchases associated with death and $15.0 million per calendar quarter for the purpose of funding hardship repurchases. In addition, notwithstanding anything to the contrary, at no time during any consecutive twelve month period may the aggregate number of shares repurchased under the program exceed 5.0% of the aggregate number of issued and outstanding shares of our common stock at the beginning of the twelve month period. If the funds reserved for either category of repurchase under the Second Amended Program are insufficient to repurchase all of the shares for which repurchase requests have been received for a particular quarter, or if the number of shares accepted for repurchase would cause us to exceed the 5.0% limit, we will repurchase the shares in the following order: (1) for death repurchases, we will repurchase shares in chronological order, based upon the beneficial owner’s date of death; and (2) for hardship repurchases, we will repurchase shares on a pro rata basis, up to, but not in excess of, the limits described herein; provided, that in the event that the repurchase would result in a stockholder owning less than 150 shares, we will repurchase all of that stockholder’s shares.
For three months ended March 31, 2013, we received requests for the repurchase of 1.4 million shares of our common stock. Of these requests, we repurchased 1.4 million shares of common stock for $9.8 million in April 2013. There were no additional requests outstanding. For three months ended June 30, 2013, we received requests for the repurchase of 1.3 million shares of our common stock. Of these requests, we repurchased 1.3 million shares of common stock for $8.9 million in July 2013. There were no additional requests outstanding. The price per share for all shares repurchased was $6.93 and all repurchases were funded from proceeds from our distribution reinvestment plan.
 
Total number of share repurchase requests
 
Total number of shares repurchased (a)
 
Price per share at date of redemption
 
Total value of shares repurchased
(in thousands)
For the quarter ended March 31, 2013
1,420,440

 
1,420,440

 
$6.93
 
$9,844
For the quarter ended June 30, 2013
1,286,078

 
1,286,078

 
$6.93
 
$8,913
(a) Shares are repurchased in the month subsequent to the quarter in which the requests were received.

We may, from time to time, seek to retire or purchase additional amounts of our outstanding equity securities through cash purchases and/or exchanges for other securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or

-47-

exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.


Borrowings
The table below presents, on a consolidated basis, the principal amount, weighted average interest rates and maturity date (by year) on our mortgage debt as of June 30, 2013 (dollar amounts are stated in thousands).
 
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Thereafter
Total
Maturing debt :
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Fixed rate debt (mortgage loans)
$
200,992

201,981

422,090

785,638

1,184,029

1,380,765

4,175,495

  Variable rate debt (mortgage loans)
$
73,315

388,231

228,253

135,765

175,295

98,229

1,099,088

Weighted average interest rate on debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Fixed rate debt (mortgage loans)
6.10%
5.64%
5.68%
5.46%
5.73%
5.74%
5.69%
  Variable rate debt (mortgage loans)
3.10%
2.83%
2.70%
2.80%
2.95%
2.87%
2.84%
The debt maturity excludes mortgage discounts associated with debt assumed at acquisition of which a net discount of $23.6 million, net of accumulated amortization, is outstanding as of June 30, 2013. Of the total outstanding debt for all years, approximately $433,065 is recourse to the Company.
As of June 30, 2013, we had approximately $274.3 million and $590.2 million in mortgage debt maturing in 2013 and 2014, respectively. We are currently negotiating refinancing the 2013 debt with the existing lenders at terms that will most likely be at comparable rates. We currently anticipate that we will be able to repay or refinance all of our debt on a timely basis, and believe we have adequate sources of funds to meet our short term cash needs. However, there can be no assurance that we can obtain such refinancing on satisfactory terms. Continued volatility in the capital markets could expose us to the risk of not being able to borrow on terms and conditions acceptable to us for future acquisitions or refinancings.

On May 8, 2013, we entered into a credit agreement with KeyBank National Association, JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association and other financial institutions to provide for a senior unsecured credit facility in the aggregate amount of $275 million. The credit facility consists of a $200 million senior unsecured revolving line of credit and a $75 million unsecured term loan. The line of credit is backed by a pool of unencumbered properties that needs to comply with certain covenants laid out in the credit agreement. The credit facility also contains an accordion feature that allows us to increase the aggregate availability thereunder to up to $600 million in certain circumstances. Upon closing, we borrowed the term loan of $75 million in full, and the proceeds were used to pay off existing debt. As of June 30, 2013, we had a total of $25 million outstanding under revolving line of credit. The revolver bears interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.60% to 2.45%, while the rate on the term loan is equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.50% to 2.45%. As of June 30 2013, the interest rates for the revolver and the term loan were 2.10% and 2.00%, respectively. As of June 30 2013, we believe we were in compliance with all covenants and default provisions under the credit agreement and our current business plan, which is based on our expectations of operating performance, indicates that we will be able to operate in compliance with these covenants and provisions for the next twelve months and beyond. As of June 30, 2013, we had $175 million available under the revolving line of credit, after drawing $25 million at closing. The facility will assist us in bridging the timing of proceeds from disposing of non-strategic assets and acquiring retail, lodging and student housing assets.
Mortgage loans outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $5.3 billion and $5.9 billion, respectively, and had a weighted average interest rate of 5.10% and 5.10% per annum, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we had a net pay down of $117.0 million and received net proceeds of $29.1 million, respectively, against our portfolio of marketable securities. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we borrowed approximately $338.6 million and $404.5 million, respectively, secured by mortgages on our properties and assumed $36.0 million and $180.0 million of debt at acquisition on the 2013 and 2012 property acquisitions, respectively.

-48-

Summary of Cash Flows
 
Six months ended June 30
 
2013
 
2012
 
(In thousands)
Cash provided by operating activities
$
211,106

 
$
242,771

Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
$
554,799.08

 
$
(210,491
)
Cash used in financing activities
$
(690,740
)
 
$
(38,971
)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
$
75,165.08

 
$
(6,691
)
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period
$
220,779

 
$
218,163

Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period
$
295,944.08

 
$
211,472

Cash provided by operating activities was $211.1 million and $242.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and was generated primarily from operating income from property operations and interest and dividends. While our lodging and multi family properties increased operating performance and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012, the overall decrease in operating cash flow was a result of two timing adjustments. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, we saw decrease of approximately $10 million in the amount of prepaid rent compared to 2012 due to the timing of receipts. The six months ended June 30, 2012, cash provided by operating activities included an increase in the accrued interest expenses payable of $22.1 million, which was a result of a one-time change in timing of debt service payments from 2011 to 2012.
due to the disposition of 237 properties overall during the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to only 33 properties sold during the six months ended June 30, 2012. Additionally, for the six months ended June 30, 2012, cash provided by operating activities was higher due to an increase in the accrued interest expenses payable of $22,100. This was a result of a one-time change in timing of debt service payments from 2011 to 2012.
Cash provided by investing activities was $554.8 million and used in investing activities was $210.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was primarily due to the acquisition of three hotels, two retail properties, and one student housing property. These acquisitions were offset by the sale of 216 bank branches, two hotels, one multi-family apartment property, and four office properties, including our IDS property that is approximately 1.4 million square feet. The sales of these properties resulted in gains of $119.7 million. The cash used in investing activities from the six months ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to the acquisition of five hotels and one retail property which was offset by the disposition of thirty-three assets during the second quarter.
Cash used in financing activities was $690.7 million and $39.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in cash used in financing activities from six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was primarily due to the payoff of almost $1 billion in mortgage debt, substantially from the disposition of more than two-hundred properties for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to 2012. In addition, we had a net pay down on our margin securities debt of $117 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to receiving proceeds from our margin of $29 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures
Unconsolidated joint ventures are those where we have substantial influence over but do not control the entity. We account for our interest in these ventures using the equity method of accounting. For additional discussion of our investments in joint ventures, please refer to Note 5 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Our ownership percentage and related investment in each joint venture is summarized in the following table. (Dollar amounts stated in thousands.)
Joint Venture
Ownership %
 
Investment at
June 30, 2013
Cobalt Industrial REIT II
36%
 
$
87,906

D.R. Stephens Institutional Fund, LLC
90%
 
40,693

Brixmor/IA JV, LLC
(a)
 
83,983

IAGM Retail Fund I, LLC (b)
55%
 
82,408

Other Unconsolidated Entities
Various
 
28,531

 
 
 
$
323,521


-49-

(a)
We have preferred membership interest and are entitled to a 11% preferred dividend in Brixmor/IA JV, LLC.
(b)
On April 17, 2013, the Company entered into a joint venture, IAGM Retail Fund I, LLC ("IAGM"), with PGGM Private Real Estate Fund ("PGGM"), for the purpose of acquiring, owning, managing, supervising, and disposing of properties and sharing in the profits and losses from those properties and its activities. The Company initially contributed 13 multi-tenant retail properties totaling 2,109,324 square feet from its portfolio to IAGM for an equity interest of $96,788, and PGGM contributed $79,190. The gross disposition price was $409,277. The Company treated this disposition as a partial sale, and the activity related to the disposed properties remains in continuing operations on the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income, since the Company has an equity interest in IAGM, and therefore the Company has continued ownership interest in the properties. The Company recognized a gain on sale of $12,863, which is included in other income on the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income, and recorded an equity investment basis adjustment of $15,723. The Company amortizes the basis adjustment over the life of the joint venture.
The Company is the managing member of IAGM, responsible for the day-to-day activities and earns fees for venture management, property management, leasing and other services provided to IAGM. The Company analyzed the joint venture agreement and determined that it was not a variable interest entity. The Company also considered PGGM's participating rights under the joint venture agreement and determined that PGGM has the ability to participate in major decisions, which equates to shared decision making ability. As such, the Company does not control IAGM. Therefore, this joint venture is unconsolidated and accounted for using the equity method of accounting.

Seasonality
The lodging segment is seasonal in nature, reflecting higher revenue and operating income during the second and third quarters. This seasonality can be expected to cause fluctuations in our net property operations for the lodging segment. None of our other segments are seasonal in nature.
 


-50-

Selected Financial Data
The following table shows our consolidated selected financial data relating to our consolidated historical financial condition and results of operations. Such selected data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report (dollar amounts are stated in thousands, except per share amounts).
 
As of
June 30, 2013
 
As of
December 31, 2012
Balance Sheet Data:
 
 
 
  Total assets
$
9,814,666

 
$
10,759,884

  Debt
$
5,273,055

 
$
6,006,146

 
For the six months ended
 
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
Operating Data:
 
 
 
  Total income
$
744,011

 
$
655,512

  Total interest and dividend income
$
10,193

 
$
10,913

  Net loss attributable to Company
$
(28,270
)
 
$
(48,193
)
  Net loss per common share, basic and diluted
$
(0.03
)
 
$
(0.05
)
Common Stock Distributions:
 
 
 
  Distributions declared to common stockholders
$
223,781

 
$
218,858

  Distributions paid to common stockholders
$
223,345

 
$
218,433

  Distributions per weighted average common share
$
0.25

 
$
0.25

Funds from Operations:
 
 
 
  Funds from operations (a)
$
246,718

 
$
226,686

Cash Flow Data:
 
 
 
  Cash flows provided by operating activities
$
211,106

 
$
242,771

  Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
$
554,799.08

 
$
(210,491
)
  Cash flow used in financing activities
$
(690,740
)
 
$
(38,971
)
Other Information:
 
 
 
  Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
894,679,702

 
875,037,776


(a)
We consider “Funds from Operations, or “FFO” a widely accepted and appropriate measure of performance for a REIT. FFO provides a supplemental measure to compare our performance and operations to other REITs. Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts or NAREIT, an industry trade group, has promulgated a standard known as FFO, which it believes reflects the operating performance of a REIT. As defined by NAREIT, FFO means net income computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization and impairment charges on depreciable property and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures in which we hold an interest. In calculating FFO, impairment charges of depreciable real estate assets are added back even though the impairment charge may represent a permanent decline in value due to decreased operating performance of the applicable property. Further, because gains and losses from sales of property are excluded from FFO, it is consistent and appropriate that impairments, which are often early recognition of losses on prospective sales of property, also be excluded. If evidence exists that a loss reflected in the investment of an unconsolidated entity is due to the write-down of depreciable real estate assets, these impairment charges are added back to FFO. The methodology is consistent with the concept of excluding impairment charges of depreciable assets or early recognition of losses on sale of depreciable real estate assets held by the Company.
FFO is neither intended to be an alternative to “net income” nor to “cash flows from operating activities” as determined by GAAP as a measure of our capacity to pay distributions. We believe that FFO is a better measure of our properties’ operating performance because FFO excludes non-cash items from GAAP net income. FFO is calculated as follows (in thousands):


-51-

 
 
For the six months ended
June 30
Funds from Operations:
2013
 
2012
 
Net loss attributable to Company
$
(28,270
)
 
$
(48,193
)
Add:
Depreciation and amortization related to investment properties
205,028

 
221,053

 
Depreciation and amortization related to investment in unconsolidated entities
16,185

 
21,436

 
Provision for asset impairment
189,544

 
27,887

 
Impairment of investment in unconsolidated entities
1,003

 
4,200

 
Impairment reflected in equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
—

 
470

 
 
 
 
 
Less:
Gains (losses) from property sales and transfer of assets (1)
132,921

 
(2,231
)
 
Gains from property sales reflected in equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
3,416

 
2,398

 
Gain from sale of investment in unconsolidated entities
435

 
—

 
Funds from operations
$
246,718

 
226,686


(1) Includes gain on sale of properties of $12,863 recognized in other income on the consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income, for the contribution of properties to the IAGM Retail Fund I, LLC joint venture for the six months June 30, 2013.
Below is additional information related to certain items that significantly impact the comparability of our Funds from Operations and Net Income (Loss) or significant non-cash items from the periods presented (in thousands):

 
For the six months ended
June 30
 
2013
 
2012
Impairment on securities
$
—

 
$
1,899

Loss on extinguishment of debt
2,396

 
1,398

Gain on extinguishment of debt reflected in equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
(5,709
)
 
—

Straight-line rental income
(4,630
)
 
(5,439
)
Amortization of above/below market leases
(1,764
)
 
(1,315
)
Amortization of mark to market debt discounts
3,111

 
3,143

Acquisition costs
736

 
1,374


Subsequent Events

On July 1, 2013 we contributed the recently purchased South Frisco Village Shopping Center to the IAGM Retail Fund I, LLC joint venture for a gross disposition price of $34.4 million. On August 1, 2013,we sold five multi-family properties for $163.6 million as part of a larger portfolio sale. The anticipated disposition for the remaining portfolio, consisting of nine properties, is late August, 2013 and expect to recognize gains on sale. Also subsequent to June 30, 2013 we sold eight bank branches for $15.1 million.

On August 8, 2013, we entered into an equity interest purchase agreement with AR Capital, LLC (the "Buyer") to sell its core net lease assets, including 294 properties in an all-cash transaction valued at approximately $2.3 billion, including the assumption of approximately $795.3 million of debt and repayment by us of approximately $360.9 million of debt. We expect to recognize gains on sale. The properties included retail, office and industrial assets. In connection with entering into the purchase agreement, the Buyer has posted a non-refundable deposit into escrow. The sale is expected to be consummated through three closings, with the initial closing expected to occur approximately 45 days from execution of the purchase agreement, the second closing expected to occur approximately 120 days and the final closing expected to occur on or prior to May 8, 2014. The sale completion is subject to customary closing conditions, and the sale of certain properties is subject to obtaining lender consents in connection with the Buyer's assumption of existing indebtedness, tenant waivers and redeeming joint venture interests. In addition, for a limited period of time following execution of the Purchase Agreement, the Buyer may exclude from the transaction for any reason properties having an aggregate value of up to approximately $183.3 million, provided the Buyer may not exclude more than 13 properties

-52-

under this exclusion right. The Buyer may also exclude properties from the transaction for title or environmental conditions subject to certain exceptions and our right to cure, as describe in the purchase agreement. The purchase agreement contains limited termination rights for both us and the Buyer. We filed a form 8-K on August 9, 2013, the purchase agreement was attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the filing.


-53-

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are subject to market risk associated with changes in interest rates both in terms of variable-rate debt and the price of new fixed-rate debt upon maturity of existing debt and for acquisitions. We are also subject to market risk associated with our marketable securities investments.
Interest Rate Risk
Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. If market rates of interest on all of the floating rate debt as of June 30, 2013 permanently increased by 1%, the increase in interest expense on the floating rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $11.0 million. If market rates of interest on all of the floating rate debt as of June 30, 2013 permanently decreased by 1%, the decrease in interest expense on the floating rate debt would increase future earnings and cash flows by approximately $11.0 million.
With regard to our variable rate financing, we assess interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities. We maintain risk management control systems to monitor interest rate cash flow risk attributable to both of our outstanding or forecasted debt obligations as well as our potential offsetting hedge positions. The risk management control systems involve the use of analytical techniques, including cash flow sensitivity analysis, to estimate the expected impact of changes in interest rates on our future cash flows.
We monitor interest rate risk using a variety of techniques, including periodically evaluating fixed interest rate quotes on all variable rate debt and the costs associated with converting the debt to fixed rate debt. Also, existing fixed and variable rate loans that are scheduled to mature in the next year or two are evaluated for possible early refinancing and or extension due to consideration given to current interest rates.
We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates on loans secured by our properties. To the extent we do, we are exposed to credit risk and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes us, which creates credit risk for us. When the fair value of a derivative contract is negative, we owe the counterparty and, therefore, it does not possess credit risk. It is our policy to enter into these transactions with the same party providing the financing. In the alternative, we seek to minimize the credit risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions with what we believe are high-quality counterparties. Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates. The market risk associated with interest-rate contracts is managed by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken.
The following table summarizes interest rate swap contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
Date Entered
Effective Date
End Date
Pay Fixed Rate
Receive Floating
Rate Index
 
Notional Amount

 
Fair Value as of
June 30, 2013
 
Fair Value as of December 31, 2012
March 28, 2008
March 28, 2008
March 27, 2013
3.32%
1 month LIBOR
 
N/A

 
$
—

 
$
(243
)
October 15, 2010
November 1, 2010
April 23, 2013
0.94%
1 month LIBOR
 
N/A

 
—

 
(68
)
January 7, 2011
January 7, 2011
January 2, 2013
0.91%
1 month LIBOR
 
N/A

 
—

 
(1
)
January 7, 2011
January 7, 2011
January 2, 2013
0.91%
1 month LIBOR
 
N/A

 
—

 
—

September 1, 2011
September 29, 2012
September 29, 2014
0.79%
1 month LIBOR
 
56,100

 
(344
)
 
(507
)
October 14, 2011
October 14, 2011
October 22, 2013
1.037%
1 month LIBOR
 
N/A

 
—

 
(52
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
56,100

 
$
(344
)
 
$
(871
)
We have, and may in the future enter into, derivative positions that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. The gains or losses resulting from marking-to-market, these derivatives at the end of each reporting period are recognized as an increase or decrease in “interest expense” on our consolidated statements of income. In addition, we are, and may in the future be, subject to additional expense based on the notional amount of the derivative positions and a specified spread over LIBOR.
 

-54-

Equity Price Risk
We are exposed to equity price risk as a result of our investments in marketable equity securities. Equity price risk is based on volatility of equity prices and the values of corresponding equity indices.
We incurred no impairments on our investments in marketable securities for the six months ended June 30, 2013. We recorded impairment of $1.9 million for other-than-temporary declines in marketable securities for the six months ended June 30, 2012. We believe that our investments will continue to generate dividend income and we could continue to recognize gains on sale. However, due to general economic and credit market uncertainties it is difficult to project where the REIT market and our portfolio will perform in 2013.
Although it is difficult to project what factors may affect the prices of equity sectors and how much the effect might be, the table below illustrates the impact of a 10% increase and a 10% decrease in the price of the equities held by us would have on the value of the total assets and the book value of the Company as of June 30, 2013 (dollar amounts stated in thousands).

 
 
 
Hypothetical 10% Decrease in
Hypothetical 10% Increase in
 
Cost
Fair Value
Market Value
Market Value
Equity securities
$
194,385

$
286,872

$
258,185

$
315,559


-55-

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) and Rule 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, evaluated as of June 30, 2013, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e). Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as of June 30, 2013, were effective for the purpose of ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Exchange Act and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no significant changes to our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) or Rule 15d-15(f)) during the six months ended June 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 


-56-

Part II - Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

As previously disclosed, we received a stockholder demand that claims the officers, the board of directors, the Business Manager and the affiliates of the Business Manager (i) falsely reported the value of our common stock until September 2010; (ii) caused us to purchase shares of its common stock from stockholders at prices in excess of its value; and (iii) disguised returns of capital paid to stockholders as REIT income resulting in payment of fees to the business manager for which it is not entitled. On March 21, 2013, counsel for these three stockholders filed a derivative lawsuit in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, seeking recovery of damages in an unspecified amount allegedly sustained by the Company. The case has been stayed to permit the special litigation committee to complete its investigation.
On April 26, 2013, two of our stockholders filed a putative class action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against us, and current members and one former member of our board of directors ("the Defendants"). The complaint seeks damages on behalf of plaintiffs and similarly situated individuals who purchased additional shares pursuant to our Distribution Reinvestment Plan ("DRP") on or after March 30, 2009. Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to plaintiffs and to members of the putative class by inflating the yearly estimated share price and by selling shares in the DRP to plaintiffs and members of the putative class at those allegedly inflated prices. We believe that the complaint lacks merit and intend to vigorously defend the case.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following risk factor supplements the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The financial covenants under our credit agreement may restrict our ability to make distributions and our operating and acquisition activities. If we breach the financial covenants we could be held in default under the credit agreement, which could accelerate our repayment date and materially adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition.

On May 8, 2013, the Company entered into a credit agreement with KeyBank National Association, JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association and other financial institutions to provide for a senior unsecured credit facility in the aggregate amount of $275 million. The credit facility consists of a $200 million senior unsecured revolving line of credit and a $75 million unsecured term loan. Upon closing the credit agreement, the Company borrowed the full amount of the term loan. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had $175 million available under the revolving line of credit, after drawing $25 million at closing. This full recourse credit agreement requires compliance with certain financial covenants including: a minimum net worth requirement, restrictions on indebtedness, a distribution limitation and investment restrictions. These covenants could prevent or inhibit the Company's ability to make distributions to its stockholders and to pursue some business initiatives or effect certain transactions that may otherwise be beneficial to the Company.

The credit agreement also contains customary default provisions including the failure to (i) timely pay debt service: (ii) comply with financial and operating covenants in the credit agreement; or (iii) pay when due, all amounts outstanding under the credit agreement. Declaration of a default by the lenders under the credit agreement could restrict the Company's ability to borrow additional monies and accelerate all amounts outstanding under the credit facility which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.


Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Share Repurchase Plan

Our board of directors adopted a share repurchase program, which became effective August 31, 2005 and was suspended as of March 30, 2009. Our board later adopted an Amended and Restated Share Repurchase Program, which was effective from April 11, 2011 through January 31, 2012, and subsequently adopted a Second Amended and Restated Share Repurchase Program, which became effective as of February 1, 2012.

Under the current program, we may repurchase shares of our common stock, on a quarterly basis, from the beneficiary of a stockholder that has died or from stockholders that have a “qualifying disability” or are confined to a “long-term care facility” (together, referred to herein as “hardship repurchases”). We are authorized to repurchase shares at a price per share equal to 100% of the most recently disclosed estimated per share value of our common stock, which currently is equal to $6.93 per share. Our obligation to repurchase any shares under the program is conditioned upon our having sufficient funds available to complete the repurchase. Our board has initially reserved $10.0 million per calendar quarter for the purpose of funding repurchases associated with

-57-

death and $15.0 million per calendar quarter for the purpose of funding hardship repurchases. In addition, notwithstanding anything to the contrary, at no time during any consecutive twelve month period may the aggregate number of shares repurchased under the program exceed 5.0% of the aggregate number of issued and outstanding shares of our common stock at the beginning of the twelve month period. For any calendar quarter, if the number of shares accepted for repurchase would cause us to exceed the 5.0% limit, repurchases for death will take priority over any hardship repurchases, in each case in accordance with the procedures, and subject to the funding limits, described in the program and summarized herein.

The table below outlines the shares of common stock we repurchased pursuant to the Second Amended Program during the three months ended June 30, 2013.
 
Total Number of Shares Repurchased
Average Price Paid per Share
Total Number of Shares Repurchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 2013
1,420,440

$6.93
1,420,440

(1)
May 2013
—

—

—

(1)
June 2013
—

—

—

(1)
 
1,420,440

$6.93
1,420,440

(1)
(1) A description of the maximum number of shares that may be purchased under our Amended Program is included in the narrative preceding this table.
The shares reported in the table above were repurchased based on those requests received during the three months ended March 31, 2013. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, we received requests for the repurchase of an additional 1.3 million shares of our common stock. Of these requests, we repurchased 1.3 million shares of common stock for $8.9 million in July 2013. The price per share for all of these shares repurchased was $6.93 and all repurchases were funded from proceeds from our distribution reinvestment plan. However, because we repurchase shares accepted for repurchase for a particular calendar quarter on the day that is five business days prior to the last business day of the first month of the subsequent calendar quarter, the shares repurchased based on those requests received during the three months ended June 30, 2013 are not reportable in the table above.


Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

Not Applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits

The exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.



-58-

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

INLAND AMERICAN REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.

 
/s/ Thomas P. McGuinness
 
/s/ Jack Potts
By:
Thomas P. McGuinness
By:
Jack Potts
 
President
 
Treasurer and principal financial officer
Date:
August 13, 2013
Date:
August 13, 2013




-59-


EXHIBIT NO.
DESCRIPTION
  3.1
Sixth Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K, as filed by the Registrant with the SEC on August 26, 2010)
  3.2
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc., effective as of April 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K, as filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2008), as amended by the Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Inland American Real Estate Trust, Inc., effective as of January 20, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K, as filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 23, 2009)
  4.1
Second Amended and Restated Distribution Reinvestment Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K, as filed by the Registrant with the SEC on September 23, 2010)
  4.2
Statement regarding restrictions on transferability of shares of common stock (to appear on stock certificate or to be sent upon request and without charge to stockholders issued shares without certificates) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Amendment No. 1 to Form S-11 Registration Statement, as filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 31, 2007 (file number 333-139504))
31.1
Certification by Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
31.2
Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.1
Certification by Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*(1)
32.2
Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*(1)
101
The following financial information from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2013, is formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (tagged as blocks of text).(2)

*
Filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
(1)
In accordance with Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section. Such certification will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
(2)
The XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.


-60-