XML 39 R25.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3.a.u2
BUSINESS DESCRIPTION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
BUSINESS DESCRIPTION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  
Business and Basis of Accounting

Business and Basis of Accounting

Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”) is a holding company with operating subsidiaries (collectively “Consolidated”) that provide communication solutions to consumer, commercial and carrier customers across a 23-state service area.

 

Leveraging our advanced fiber network spanning more than 37,000 fiber route miles, we offer residential high-speed Internet, video, phone and home security services as well as multi-service residential and small business bundles.  Our business product suite includes data and Internet solutions, voice, data center services, security services, managed and IT services, and an expanded suite of cloud services.  As of December 31, 2019, we had approximately 836,000 voice connections, 784,000 data connections and 84,000 video connections.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

Preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that effect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results may differ materially from those estimates.  Our critical accounting estimates include (i) impairment evaluations associated with indefinite-lived intangible assets (Note 1), (ii) the determination of deferred tax asset and liability balances (Notes 1 and 12) and (iii) pension plan and other post-retirement costs and obligations (Notes 1 and 11).

Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and our wholly-owned subsidiaries and subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

Recent Business Developments

Recent Business Developments

On July 3, 2017, we completed our acquisition of FairPoint Communications, Inc. (“FairPoint”), pursuant to the terms of a definitive agreement and plan of merger (as amended, the “Merger Agreement”) and acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of FairPoint in exchange for shares of our common stock (the “Merger”).  As a result of the Merger, FairPoint became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.  The financial results for FairPoint have been included in our consolidated financial statements as of the acquisition date.  For a more complete discussion of the transaction, refer to Note 4.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.  Our cash equivalents consist primarily of money market funds.  The carrying amounts of our cash equivalents approximate their fair values.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable consists primarily of amounts due to the Company from normal business activities.  We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses that result from the inability of our customers to make required payments.  The allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained based on customer payment levels, historical experience and management’s views on trends in the overall receivable agings.  In addition, for larger accounts, we perform analyses of risks on a customer-specific basis.  We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and management believes that an adequate allowance for doubtful accounts has been provided.  Uncollectible

accounts are removed from accounts receivable and are charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts when internal collection efforts have been unsuccessful.  The following table summarizes the activity in allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

 

Balance at beginning of year

$

4,421

$

6,667

$

2,813

Provision charged to expense

 

9,347

 

8,793

 

7,072

Write-offs, less recoveries

 

(9,219)

 

(11,039)

 

(6,516)

Acquired allowance for doubtful accounts

3,298

Balance at end of year

$

4,549

$

4,421

$

6,667

Investments

Investments

Our investments are primarily accounted for under either the equity method or at cost.  If we have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operations and financial policies of an affiliated company, the investment in the affiliated company is accounted for using the equity method.  If we do not have control and also cannot exercise significant influence, we account for these investments at our initial cost less impairment because fair value is not readily available for these investments.

We review our investment portfolio periodically to determine whether there are identified events or circumstances that would indicate there is a decline in the fair value that is considered to be other than temporary.  If we believe the decline is other than temporary, we evaluate the financial performance of the business and compare the carrying value of the investment to quoted market prices (if available) or the fair value of similar investments.  If an investment is deemed to have experienced an impairment that is considered other-than temporary, the carrying amount of the investment is reduced to its quoted or estimated fair value, as applicable, and an impairment loss is recognized in other income (expense).

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We account for certain assets and liabilities at fair value.  Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.  As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability.  A financial asset or liability’s classification within a three-tiered value hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques into three broad levels in order to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.  The levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 – Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 – Inputs that reflect quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets and inputs other than quoted prices that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost.  We capitalize additions and substantial improvements and expense repairs and maintenance costs as incurred.

We capitalize the cost of internal-use network and non-network software which has a useful life in excess of one year. Subsequent additions, modifications or upgrades to internal-use network and non-network software are capitalized only to the extent that they allow the software to perform a task it previously did not perform. Software maintenance and training costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. Also, we capitalize interest associated with the development of internal-use network and non-network software.

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

    

December 31,

    

December 31,

    

Estimated 

 

(In thousands)

2019

2018

Useful Lives

 

Land and buildings

$

270,443

$

257,208

 

18

-

40

years

Central office switching and transmission

 

1,363,533

 

1,234,687

 

3

-

25

years

Outside plant cable, wire and fiber facilities

 

2,002,264

 

1,934,185

 

3

-

50

years

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

 

287,711

 

285,102

 

3

-

15

years

Assets under finance leases

 

51,324

 

63,016

 

1

-

20

years

Total plant in service

 

3,975,275

 

3,774,198

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

(2,228,481)

 

(1,953,813)

Plant in service

 

1,746,794

 

1,820,385

Construction in progress

 

59,624

 

68,325

Construction inventory

 

29,460

 

38,416

Totals

$

1,835,878

$

1,927,126

Construction inventory, which is stated at weighted average cost, consists primarily of network construction materials and supplies that when issued are predominately capitalized as part of new customer installations and the construction of the network.

We record depreciation using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives using either the group or unit method.  The useful lives are estimated at the time the assets are acquired and are based on historical experience with similar assets, anticipated technological changes and the expected impact of our strategic operating plan on our network infrastructure.  In addition, the ranges of estimated useful lives presented above are impacted by the accounting for business combinations as the lives assigned to these acquired assets are generally much shorter than that of a newly acquired asset.  The group method is used for depreciable assets dedicated to providing regulated telecommunication services, including the majority of the network, outside plant facilities and certain support assets.  A depreciation rate for each asset group is developed based on the average useful life of the group.  The group method requires periodic revision of depreciation rates.  When an individual asset is sold or retired, the difference between the proceeds, if any, and the cost of the asset is charged or credited to accumulated depreciation, without recognition of a gain or loss.

The unit method is primarily used for buildings, furniture, fixtures and other support assets. Each asset is depreciated on the straight-line basis over its estimated useful life.  When an individual asset is sold or retired, the cost basis of the asset and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any associated gain or loss is recognized.

Depreciation and amortization expense related to property, plant and equipment was $315.0 million, $366.3 million and $263.8 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  Amortization of assets under capital leases is included in the depreciation and amortization expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

We evaluate the recoverability of our property, plant and equipment whenever events or substantive changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable.  Recoverability is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset group to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group.  If the total of the expected future undiscounted cash flows were less than the carrying amount of the asset group, we would recognize an impairment charge for the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying value of the asset group.

Intangible Assets

Intangible Assets

Indefinite-Lived Intangibles

Goodwill and tradenames are evaluated for impairment annually or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired.  We evaluate the carrying value of goodwill and tradenames as of November 30 of each year.

Goodwill

Goodwill is the excess of the acquisition cost of a business over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired.  Goodwill is not amortized but instead evaluated annually for impairment.  The evaluation of goodwill may first include a

qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.  Events and circumstances integrated into the qualitative assessment process include a combination of macroeconomic conditions affecting equity and credit markets, significant changes to the cost structure, overall financial performance and other relevant events affecting the reporting unit.

For the 2019 assessment, we evaluated the fair value of goodwill compared to the carrying value using the quantitative approach.  When we use the quantitative approach to assess the goodwill carrying value and the fair value of our single reporting unit, the fair value of our reporting unit is compared to its carrying amount, including goodwill. The estimated fair value of the reporting unit is determined using a combination of market-based approaches and a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) model. The assumptions used in the estimate of fair value are based upon a combination of historical results and trends, new industry developments and future cash flow projections, as well as relevant comparable company earnings multiples for the market-based approaches.  Such assumptions are subject to change as a result of changing economic and competitive conditions.  We use a weighting of the results derived from the valuation approaches to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit.  For the 2019 assessment, using the quantitative approach, we concluded that the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the carrying value at November 30, 2019 and that there was no impairment of goodwill.  

In measuring the fair value of our single reporting unit as described, we consider the fair value of our reporting unit in relation to our overall enterprise value, measured as the publicly traded stock price multiplied by the fully diluted shares outstanding plus the fair value of outstanding debt.  Our reporting unit fair value models are consistent with a range in value indicated by both the preceding three month average stock price and the stock price on the valuation date, plus an estimated acquisition premium which is based on observable transactions of comparable companies, if applicable.

If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a goodwill impairment is recorded for the difference in the carrying value and fair value.  We did not recognize any goodwill impairment in 2019, 2018 or 2017 as a result of the impairment tests.

At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the carrying value of goodwill was $1,035.3 million.

Trade Name

Our trade name is the federally registered mark CONSOLIDATED, a design of interlocking circles, which is used in association with our communication services.  The Company’s corporate branding strategy leverages a CONSOLIDATED naming structure.  All of the Company’s business units and several of our products and services incorporate the CONSOLIDATED name.  Trade names with indefinite useful lives are not amortized but are tested for impairment at least annually.  If facts and circumstances change relating to a trade name’s continued use in the branding of our products and services, it may be treated as a finite-lived asset and begin to be amortized over its estimated remaining life.  The carrying value of our trade names, excluding any finite lived trade names, was $10.6 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018.

For the 2019 assessment, we used the quantitative approach to evaluate the fair value compared to the carrying value of the trade name.  Based on our assessment, we concluded that the fair value of the trade names continued to exceed the carrying value.  When we use the quantitative approach to estimate the fair value of our trade names, we use DCFs based on a relief from royalty method.  If the fair value of our trade names was less than the carrying amount, we would recognize an impairment charge for the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying value of the assets.  We perform our impairment testing of our trade names as single units of accounting based on their use in our single reporting unit.

Finite-Lived Intangible Assets

Finite-lived intangible assets subject to amortization consist primarily of our customer lists of an established base of customers that subscribe to our services, trade names of acquired companies and other intangible assets.  Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized using an accelerated amortization method or on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.  We evaluate the potential impairment of finite-lived intangible assets when impairment indicators exist.  If the carrying value is no longer recoverable based upon the undiscounted future cash flows of the asset, an impairment equal to the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the asset is recognized.  We did not recognize any intangible impairment charges in the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 or 2017.

The components of finite-lived intangible assets are as follows:

December 31, 2019

December 31, 2018

 

    

    

    

Gross Carrying 

    

Accumulated

    

Gross Carrying 

    

Accumulated

 

(In thousands)

    

Useful Lives

    

Amount

    

Amortization

    

Amount

    

Amortization

 

 

Customer relationships

 

3

 - 

13

years

$

321,333

$

(157,264)

$

516,561

$

(287,602)

Trade names

 

1

 - 

2

years

 

 

 

2,290

 

(2,290)

Other intangible assets

 

5

years

 

 

 

5,600

 

(4,674)

Total

$

321,333

$

(157,264)

$

524,451

$

(294,566)

Amortization expense related to the finite-lived intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $66.2 million, $66.3 million and $28.0 million, respectively.  Expected future amortization expense of finite-lived intangible assets is as follows:

(In thousands)

    

 

2020

$

50,652

2021

 

39,479

2022

 

30,850

2023

 

23,963

2024

10,617

Thereafter

8,508

Total

$

164,069

Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivative Financial Instruments

We use derivative financial instruments to manage our exposure to the risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates. Our interest rate swap agreements effectively convert a portion of our floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis, thereby reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future cash interest payments.  At the inception of a hedge transaction, we formally document the relationship between the hedging instruments including our objective and strategy for establishing the hedge.  In addition, the effectiveness of the derivative instrument is assessed at inception and on an ongoing basis throughout the hedging period.  Counterparties to derivative instruments expose us to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance.  We execute agreements only with financial institutions we believe to be creditworthy and regularly assess the credit worthiness of each of the counterparties.  We do not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets.  Fair value is determined based on projected interest rate yield curves and an estimate of our nonperformance risk or our counterparty’s nonperformance credit risk, as applicable.  We do not anticipate any nonperformance by any counterparty.

For derivative instruments designated as a cash flow hedge, the change in the fair value is recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) and is recognized as an adjustment to earnings over the period in which the hedged item impacts earnings.  When an interest rate swap agreement terminates, any resulting gain or loss is recognized over the shorter of the remaining original term of the hedging instrument or the remaining life of the underlying debt obligation.  If a derivative instrument is de-designated, the remaining gain or loss in AOCI on the date of de-designation is amortized to earnings over the remaining term of the hedging instrument. For derivative financial instruments that are not designated as a hedge, including those that have been de-designated, changes in fair value are recognized on a current basis in earnings.  Cash flows from hedging activities are classified under the same category as the cash flows from the hedged items in our consolidated statement of cash flows.  See Note 8 for further discussion of our derivative financial instruments.

Share-based Compensation

Share-based Compensation

We recognize share-based compensation expense for all restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) and performance share awards (“PSAs”) (collectively, “stock awards”) based on the estimated fair value of the stock awards on the date of grant.  We recognize the expense associated with RSAs and PSAs on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which

generally ranges from immediate vesting to a four-year vesting period, and account for forfeitures as they occur.  See Note 10 for additional information regarding share-based compensation.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

Our estimates of income taxes and the significant items resulting in the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities are disclosed in Note 12 and reflect our assessment of future tax consequences of transactions that have been reflected in our financial statements or tax returns for each taxing jurisdiction in which we operate.  We base our provision for income taxes on our current period income, changes in our deferred income tax assets and liabilities, income tax rates, changes in estimates of our uncertain tax positions and tax planning opportunities available in the jurisdictions in which we operate.  We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities when there are temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of our assets and liabilities and for the expected benefits of using net operating loss and tax credit loss carryforwards.  We establish valuation allowances when necessary to reduce the carrying amount of deferred income tax assets to the amounts that we believe are more likely than not to be realized.  We evaluate the need to retain all or a portion of the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets.  When a change in the tax rate or tax law has an impact on deferred taxes, we apply the change when the tax law change is enacted, based on the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.  As we operate in more than one state, changes in our state apportionment factors, based on operating results, may affect our future effective tax rates and the value of our deferred tax assets and liabilities. We record a change in tax rates in our consolidated financial statements in the period of enactment.

Income tax consequences that arise in connection with a business combination include identifying the tax basis of assets and liabilities acquired and any contingencies associated with uncertain tax positions assumed or resulting from the business combination.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities related to temporary differences of an acquired entity are recorded as of the date of the business combination and are based on our estimate of the appropriate tax basis that will be accepted by the various taxing authorities.

We record unrecognized tax benefits as liabilities in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 740, Income Taxes, and adjust these liabilities in the appropriate period when our judgment changes as a result of the

evaluation of new information. In certain instances, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the unrecognized tax benefit liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period in which new information is available. We classify interest and penalties, if any, associated with our uncertain tax positions as a component of interest expense and general and administrative expense, respectively.  See Note 12 for further discussion on income taxes.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when or as performance obligations are satisfied by transferring control of the good or service to the customer.

Services

 

Services revenues, with the exception of usage-based revenues, are generally billed in advance and recognized in subsequent periods when or as services are transferred to the customer.

 

We offer bundled service packages that consists of high-speed Internet, video and voice services including local and long distance calling, voicemail and calling features.  Each service is considered distinct and therefore accounted for as a separate performance obligation.  Service revenue is recognized over time, consistent with the transfer of service, as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by the Company’s performance as the Company performs.

 

Usage-based services, such as per-minute long-distance service and access charges billed to other telephone carriers for originating and terminating long-distance calls in our network, are billed in arrears.  We recognize revenue from these services when or as services are transferred to the customer. 

 

Revenue related to nonrefundable upfront fees, such as service activation and set-up fees are deferred and amortized over the expected customer life.

 

Equipment

 

Equipment revenue is generated from the sale of voice and data communications equipment as well as design, configuration, installation and professional support services related to such equipment.  Equipment revenue generated from telecommunications systems and structured cabling projects is recognized when or as the project is completed.  Maintenance services are provided on both a contract and time and material basis and are recognized when or as services are transferred.

 

Subsidies and Surcharges

 

Subsidies consist of both federal and state subsidies, which are designed to promote widely available, quality telephone service at affordable prices in rural areas.  These revenues are calculated by the administering government agency based on information we provide.  There is a reasonable possibility that out-of-period subsidy adjustments may be recorded in the future, but they are expected to be immaterial to our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

We recognize Federal Universal Service contributions on a gross basis. We account for all other taxes collected from customers and remitted to the respective government agencies on a net basis.

Advertising Costs

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.  Advertising expense was $11.5 million, $11.4 million and $10.9 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Statement of Cash Flows Information

Statement of Cash Flows Information

During 2019, 2018 and 2017, we made payments for interest and income taxes as follows:

(In thousands)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

 

Interest, net of amounts capitalized ($3,737, $5,659 and $1,246 in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively)

$

129,508

$

122,422

$

106,499

Income taxes (received) paid, net

$

(8,374)

$

(9,060)

$

953

In 2019, 2018 and 2017, we acquired equipment of $6.2 million, $19.2 million and $12.8 million, respectively, through finance or capital lease agreements.

In 2017, we issued 20.1 million shares of the Company’s common stock with a market value of $431.0 million in connection with the acquisition of FairPoint as described in Note 4.

Noncontrolling Interest

Noncontrolling Interest

We have a majority-owned subsidiary, East Texas Fiber Line Incorporated (“ETFL”), which is a joint venture owned 63% by the Company and 37% by Eastex Telecom Investments, LLC.  ETFL provides connectivity over a fiber optic transport network to certain customers residing in Texas.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Effective January 1, 2019, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02” or “ASC 842”), Leases using the optional transitional method.  ASU 2016-02 establishes a new accounting model for leases, which requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet but lease expense will be recognized on the income statement in a manner similar to previous requirements.  Under the optional transitional method, the new standard is applied using the modified retrospective approach on the date of adoption.  Prior years presented have not been adjusted for ASU 2016-02 and continue to be reported in accordance with our historical accounting policy.

As part of the adoption, we elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the new lease standard, which among other things, allows us to carry forward the historical lease classification.  As a result, there was no impact to opening retained earnings.  We elected the practical expedient to combine lease and non-lease components, as well as the practical expedient related to land easements, which allows us to carry forward our accounting treatment for land easements in existing agreements.  We also made an accounting policy election to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for leases with a term of 12 months or less and will recognize lease payments as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

The adoption of the new lease standard resulted in the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities of approximately $30.9 million for historical operating leases, while our accounting for historical finance leases remained substantially unchanged. The adoption of the new lease standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of cash flows or our debt-covenant compliance under our current agreements. For additional information on leases and the impact of the new lease standard, refer to Note 9.

Effective January 1, 2019, we adopted ASU No. 2018-07 (“ASU 2018-07”), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting.  ASU 2018-07 expands the scope of Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees to align the accounting guidance for both employee and nonemployee share-based transactions.  The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Effective January 1, 2019, we adopted ASU No. 2018-02 (“ASU 2018-02”), Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.  ASU 2018-02 provides an option to allow reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.  Tax effects in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are established at the currently enacted tax rate and reclassified to earnings in the same period in which the related pre-tax items included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are recognized.  The adoption of this guidance did not have any impact

on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures as we did not make the optional election for reclassification of stranded tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retained earnings.

Effective January 1, 2019, we adopted ASU No. 2017-12 (“ASU 2017-12”), Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. ASU 2017-12 amends current guidance on accounting for hedges mainly to align more closely an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. In addition, amendments in ASU 2017-12 simplify the application of hedge accounting by allowing more time to prepare hedge documentation and allowing effectiveness assessments to be performed on a qualitative basis after hedge inception. ASU 2017-12 was adopted using the modified retrospective transition approach, except for the amended presentation and disclosure requirements, which were applied prospectively.  Upon adoption of ASU 2017-12, we recognized a cumulative adjustment of $0.6 million, net of tax, from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to opening retained earnings.  The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In November 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2019-12 (“ASU 2019-12”), Income Taxes.  ASU 2019-12 simplifies the accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions and adding certain requirements to the general framework in ASC 740, Income Taxes. The new guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020 with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this update will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15 (“ASU 2018-15”), Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract. ASU 2018-15 provides guidance on accounting for costs of implementation activities in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract. The new guidance should be applied either retrospectively or prospectively and is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019 with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this update will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-14 (“ASU 2018-14”), Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans. ASU 2018-14 modifies disclosure requirements for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans by removing disclosures that no longer are considered cost beneficial, clarifying the specific requirement of disclosures and adding disclosure requirements identified as relevant. The new guidance is effective retrospectively for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020 with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact this update will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13 (“ASU 2016-13”), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. ASU 2016-13 establishes the new “current expected credit loss” model for measuring and recognizing credit losses on financial assets based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The new guidance is effective on a modified retrospective basis for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019. We plan to adopt the new guidance on January 1, 2020 using the modified retrospective method. While we are continuing to assess the impact of the new guidance, we currently do not anticipate that the adoption will result in a material impact to our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Reclassifications