UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

xQuarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

OR

oTransition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the transition period from                   to                  .

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-51446

CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	02-0636095
(State or other jurisdiction of	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

121 South 17th Street
Mattoon, Illinois	61938-3987
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

(217) 235-3311

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x  NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  YES o  NO o

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o  NO x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each class of Common Stock, as of the latest practicable date

Class	Outstanding as of November 3, 2010
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value	29,816,659 Shares

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No.
PART I
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) - Three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009	1
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — September 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) — Nine months ended September 30, 2010	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - Nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009	4
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	21
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	37
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	37
PART II
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	39
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	39
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	39
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	39
Item 4.	[Removed and Reserved]	39
Item 5.	Other Information	39
Item 6.	Exhibits	40

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net revenues	$	95,576		$	101,590		$	289,615		$	305,342
Operating expense:
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)	36,371			36,151			107,960			108,595
Selling, general and administrative expenses	21,686			25,600			65,879			79,327
Depreciation and amortization	21,918			21,341			64,920			63,999
Operating income	15,601			18,498			50,856			53,421
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net	(11,723		)	(14,775		)	(37,675		)	(43,794		)
Investment income	6,830			6,237			20,268			18,046
Other, net	210			(183		)	(242		)	1,032
Income before income taxes	10,918			9,777			33,207			28,705
Income tax expense (benefit)	(1,049		)	2,494			7,015			10,066
Net income	11,967			7,283			26,192			18,639
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest	130			226			385			769
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	11,837		$	7,057		$	25,807		$	17,870
Net income per common share—basic	$	0.40		$	0.24		$	0.86		$	0.60
Net income per common share—diluted	$	0.40		$	0.24		$	0.86		$	0.60
Cash dividends per common share	$	0.38		$	0.39		$	1.16		$	1.16

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)	September 30,2010(Unaudited)			December 31, 2009
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and equivalents	$	55,961		$	42,758
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,263 in 2010 and $1,796 in 2009	41,647			42,125
Income taxes receivable	5,425			3,564
Inventories	7,339			6,874
Deferred income taxes	6,992			5,970
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	7,440			6,639
Total current assets	124,804			107,930
Property, plant and equipment, net	359,618			377,200
Investments	98,123			98,748
Goodwill	520,562			520,562
Customer lists, net	85,484			102,088
Tradenames	13,446			13,446
Deferred debt issuance costs, net and other assets	6,023			6,633
Total assets	$	1,208,060		$	1,226,607
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	9,590		$	13,482
Advance billings and customer deposits	21,861			20,025
Dividends payable	11,553			11,476
Accrued expense	19,603			23,133
Current portion of capital lease obligations	—			344
Current portion of derivative liability	10,176			6,074
Current portion of pension and postretirement benefit obligations	2,908			2,908
Total current liabilities	75,691			77,442
Senior secured long-term debt	880,000			880,000
Deferred income taxes	70,380			74,711
Pension and other postretirement obligations	82,568			80,298
Other long-term liabilities	27,492			33,439
Total liabilities	1,136,131			1,145,890
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 29,816,659 and 29,608,653, shares outstanding as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively	298			296
Additional paid-in capital	102,639			109,746
Retained earnings	—			—
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(37,608		)	(35,540		)
Noncontrolling interest	6,600			6,215
Total stockholders’ equity	71,929			80,717
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,208,060		$	1,226,607

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

(Unaudited)

											Accumulated
	Common Stock				Additional Paid in			Retained			Other Comprehensive			Non- controlling
(In thousands, except share amounts)	Shares		Amount		Capital			Earnings			Loss			Interest		Total
Balance - December 31, 2009	29,608,653		$	296	$	109,746		$	—		$	(35,540	)	$	6,215	$	80,717
Dividends on common stock	—		—		(4,626		)	(6,920		)	—			—		(11,546		)
Shares issued under employee plan, net of forfeitures	213,951		2		(2		)	—			—			—		—
Non-cash, stock-based compensation	—		—		503			—			—			—		503
Comprehensive income:
Net income	—		—		—			6,920			—			131		7,051
Change in prior service cost and net loss, net of tax of $26	—		—		—			—			47			—		47
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax of $54	—		—		—			—			90			—		90
Total comprehensive income																7,188
Balance - March 31, 2010	29,822,604		$	298	$	105,621		$	—		$	(35,403	)	$	6,346	$	76,862
Dividends on common stock	—		—		(4,503		)	(7,050		)	—			—		(11,553		)
Non-cash, stock-based compensation	—		—		616			—			—			—		616
Comprehensive income:
Net income	—		—		—			7,050			—			124		7,174
Change in prior service cost and net loss, net of tax of $26	—		—		—			—			48			—		48
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax of $(722)	—		—		—			—			(1,253		)	—		(1,253		)
Total comprehensive income																5,969
Balance - June 30, 2010	29,822,604		$	298	$	101,734		$	—		$	(36,608	)	$	6,470	$	71,894
Dividends on common stock	—		—		284			(11,837		)	—			—		(11,553		)
Share forfeitures	(5,945	)	—		—			—			—			—		—
Non-cash, stock-based compensation	—		—		621			—			—			—		621
Comprehensive income:
Net income	—		—		—			11,837			—			130		11,967
Change in prior service cost and net loss, net of tax of $35	—		—		—			—			61			—		61
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax of $(616)	—		—		—			—			(1,061		)	—		(1,061		)
Total comprehensive income																10,967
Balance — September 30, 2010	29,816,659		$	298	$	102,639		$	—		$	(37,608	)	$	6,600	$	71,929

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months ended September 30,
(In thousands)	2010			2009
Operating Activities
Net income	$	26,192		$	18,639
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	64,920			63,999
Deferred income taxes	(24		)	(833		)
Loss on disposal of assets	902			—
Non-cash change in uncertain tax positions	(5,186		)	—
Cash distributions from wireless partnerships in excess of/(less than) current earnings	304			(2,299		)
Stock-based compensation expense	1,740			1,434
Amortization of deferred financing costs	970			978
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net	478			102
Income tax receivable	(4,936		)	(1,316		)
Inventories	(451		)	364
Other assets	(732		)	651
Accounts payable	(3,892		)	(869		)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	(540		)	1,360
Net cash provided by operating activities	79,745			82,210
Investing Activities
Additions to property, plant and equipment, net	(32,578		)	(30,952		)
Proceeds from the sale of assets	997			300
Proceeds from the sale of investments	35			—
Net cash used for investing activities	(31,546		)	(30,652		)
Financing Activities
Payment of capital lease obligation	(344		)	(685		)
Repurchase and retirement of common stock	—			(9		)
Dividends on common stock	(34,652		)	(34,452		)
Net cash used for financing activities	(34,996		)	(35,146		)
Net increase in cash and equivalents	13,203			16,412
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year	42,758			15,471
Cash and equivalents at end of period	$	55,961		$	31,883

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1.Nature of Operations

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries, which are collectively referred to as “Consolidated”,  the “Company”, “we”, “our” or “us”, unless the context otherwise requires.  All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

We have prepared the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.  These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented herewith reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal and recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.  The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for an entire year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

As of September 30, 2010, the Company’s Summary of Critical Accounting Policies for the year ended December 31, 2009, which are detailed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, have not changed.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.  These reclassifications had no effect on total stockholders equity, total revenue, income from operations or net income.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements through the day the financial statements are issued.

2.Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) - Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU No. 2010-06”).  ASU No. 2010-06 provides amended disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements.  Certain disclosure requirements of ASU No. 2010-06 were effective beginning in the first quarter of 2010, while other disclosure requirements of the ASU are effective for financial statements issued for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010.  Since these amended principles require only additional disclosures

5

concerning fair value measurements, adoption did not and will not affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

3.Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Prepaid and other current assets are as follows:

(In thousands)	September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Prepaid maintenance	$	2,279	$	3,152
Prepaid taxes	655		43
Deferred charges	1,003		718
Prepaid insurance	991		471
Prepaid expense - other	2,456		2,200
Current portion of derivative assets	33		—
Other current assets	23		55
Total	$	7,440	$	6,639

4.Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are as follows:

(In thousands)	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Land and buildings	$	66,138		$	66,700
Network and outside plant facilities	856,881			833,879
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	80,806			80,315
Assets under capital lease	5,144			5,144
Less: accumulated depreciation	(661,274		)	(617,141		)
	347,695			368,897
Construction in progress	11,923			8,303
Total	$	359,618		$	377,200

Depreciation expense totaled $16.4 million and $15.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $48.3 million and $47.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

5.Investments

We own 2.34% of GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited Partnership (the “Mobilnet South Partnership”).  The principal activity of the Mobilnet South Partnership is providing cellular service in the Houston, Galveston, and Beaumont, Texas metropolitan areas.  We also own 3.60% of Pittsburgh SMSA Limited Partnership (“Pittsburgh SMSA”), which provides cellular service in and around the Pittsburgh metropolitan area.  Because of our limited influence over these partnerships, we use the cost method to account for both of these investments.  For the three month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $2.9 million and $3.0 million, respectively.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $8.9 million and $8.5 million, respectively.

We also own 17.02% of GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17 Limited Partnership (“RSA #17”), 16.6725% of Pennsylvania RSA 6(I) Limited Partnership (“RSA 6(I)”), and 23.67% of Pennsylvania

6

RSA 6(II) Limited Partnership (“RSA 6(II)”).  RSA #17 provides cellular service to a limited rural area in Texas.  RSA 6(I) and RSA 6(II) provide cellular service in and around our Pennsylvania service territory.  In addition, we have a 50% ownership interest in Boulevard Communications LLP, a competitive access provider in western Pennsylvania.  Because we have significant influence over the operating and financial policies of these four entities, we account for the investments using the equity method.  For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $4.0 million and $2.8 million, respectively.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $11.5 million and $7.0 million, respectively.

Our investments are as follows:

(In thousands)	September 30, 2010		December 31,  2009
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies	$	1,327	$	1,797
Cost method investments:
GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited Partnership (2.34%)	21,450		21,450
Pittsburgh SMSA Limited Partnership (3.60%)	22,950		22,950
CoBank, ACB Stock	3,086		2,902
Other	25		60
Equity method investments:
GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17 Limited Partnership (17.02% interest)	18,989		19,080
Pennsylvania RSA 6(I) Limited Partnership (16.6725% interest)	7,149		7,301
Pennsylvania RSA 6(II) Limited Partnership (23.67% interest)	22,990		23,049
Boulevard Communications, LLP (50% interest)	157		159
Total	$	98,123	$	98,748

CoBank is a cooperative bank owned by its customers.  Annually, CoBank distributes patronage in the form of cash and stock in the cooperative based on the Company’s outstanding loan balance with CoBank, who has traditionally been a significant lender in the Company’s credit facility.   The investment in CoBank represents the accumulation of the equity patronage paid by CoBank to the Company.

6.Fair Value Measurements

The Company’s derivative instruments related to interest rate swap agreements are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.  The fair values of the interest rate swaps are determined using an internal valuation model which relies on the expected LIBOR-based yield curve and estimates of counterparty and Consolidated’s non-performance risk as the most significant inputs.  Because each of these inputs are directly observable or can be corroborated by observable market data, we have categorized these interest rate swaps as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.

The Company’s swap assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to disclosure requirements at September 30, 2010 are as follows:

7

				Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
(In thousands)	September 30, 2010			Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Current interest rate swap assets	$	33		$	—	$	33		$	—
Current interest rate swap liabilities	(10,176		)	—		(10,176		)	—
Long-term interest rate swap liabilities	(25,402		)	—		(25,402		)	—
Totals	$	(35,545	)	$	—	$	(35,545	)	$	—

The change in the fair value of the derivatives is primarily a result of a change in market expectations for future interest rates.

We have not elected the fair value option for any of our financial assets or liabilities.  The carrying value of other financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities or variable-rate nature of the respective balances.  The following table presents the other financial instruments that are not carried at fair value but which require fair value disclosure as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

	As of September 30, 2010					As of December 31, 2009
(In thousands)	Carrying Value		Fair Value			Carrying Value		Fair Value
Investments, equity basis	$	49,285			(a)	$	49,589			(a)
Investments, at cost	$	47,511			(a)	$	47,362			(a)
Long-term debt	$	880,000	$	880,000		$	880,000	$	880,000

(a)  The Company’s investments at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 accounted for under both the equity and cost methods consist of minority positions in various cellular telephone limited partnerships.  These investments are recorded using either the equity or cost methods, and it is not practical to estimate a fair value for these non-publicly traded entities.

Our long-term debt allows us to select a one month LIBOR repricing option, which we have elected.  As such, the fair value of this debt approximates its carrying value.

7.Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, goodwill and tradenames are not amortized but are subject to impairment testing—no less than annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate potential impairment.

The following table presents the carrying amount of goodwill by segment:

(In thousands)	September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Telephone Operations	$	519,541	$	519,541
Other Operations	1,021		1,021
Totals	$	520,562	$	520,562

Our most valuable tradename is the federally registered mark CONSOLIDATED, which is used in association with our telephone communication services and is a design of interlocking circles.  The Company’s corporate branding strategy leverages a CONSOLIDATED naming structure.  All of the

8

Company’s business units and several of our products and services incorporate the CONSOLIDATED name.  These tradenames are indefinitely renewable intangibles.  The carrying value of the tradenames was $13.4 million at both September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

The Company’s customer lists consist of an established base of customers that subscribe to its services.  The carrying amount of customer lists is as follows:

	Telephone Operations						Other Operations
(In thousands)	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009			September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Gross carrying amount	$	193,124		$	193,124		$	11,712		$	11,712
Less: accumulated amortization	(108,632		)	(92,358		)	(10,720		)	(10,390		)
Net carrying amount	$	84,492		$	100,766		$	992		$	1,322

Amortization associated with customer lists totaled approximately $5.5 million and $16.6 million in each of the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

8.Deferred Debt Issuance Costs, Net and Other Assets

Deferred financing costs, net and other assets are as follows:

(In thousands)	September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Deferred debt issuance costs, net	$	5,494	$	6,464
Other assets	529		169
Total	$	6,023	$	6,633

The remaining deferred debt issuance costs at September 30, 2010 of $5.5 million related to our secured credit facility will be amortized over the remaining life of 4.2 years, resulting in amortization expense of $1.3 million yearly unless the facility is extinguished earlier.

9.Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses are as follows:

(In thousands)	September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Salaries and employee benefits	$	9,282	$	11,727
Taxes payable	3,673		4,631
Accrued interest	180		1,177
Other accrued expenses	6,468		5,598
Total accrued expenses	$	19,603	$	23,133

9

10.Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:

(In thousands)	September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Senior secured credit facility - revolving loan	$	—	$	—
Senior secured credit facility - term loan	880,000		880,000
Obligations under capital lease	—		344
	880,000		880,344
Less: current portion	—		(344		)
Total long-term debt	$	880,000	$	880,000

Credit Agreement

The Company, through certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries, has outstanding a credit agreement with several financial institutions, which consists of a $50 million revolving credit facility (including a $10 million sub-limit for letters of credit) and an $880 million term loan facility.  Borrowings under the credit agreement are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company with the exception of Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company.  The term loan requires no principal reductions prior to maturity and thus matures in full on December 31, 2014.  The revolving credit facility matures on December 31, 2013.  There were no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility as of September 30, 2010.

At our election, borrowings under the credit facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus either a “base rate” or LIBOR.  As of September 30, 2010, the applicable margin for interest rates is 2.50% per year for the LIBOR-based term loans and 1.50% for alternative base rate loans.  The applicable margin for our $880 million term loan is fixed for the duration of the loan.  The applicable margin for borrowings on the revolving credit facility is determined via a pricing grid.  Based on our leverage ratio of 4.79:1 at September 30, 2010, borrowings under the revolving credit facility will be priced at a margin of 2.75% for LIBOR-based borrowings and 1.75% for alternative base rate borrowings for the three month period ending December 31, 2010.  The applicable borrowing margin for the revolving credit facility is adjusted quarterly to reflect the leverage ratio from the prior quarter-end.

The weighted-average interest rate incurred on our term loan facility during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, including amounts paid on our interest rate swap agreements and the applicable margin, was 5.58% and 6.26% per annum, respectively.  The weighted-average interest rate incurred on our term loan facility during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, including amounts paid on our interest rate swap agreements and the applicable margin, was 5.59% and 6.28% per annum, respectively.  Interest is payable at least quarterly.

The credit agreement contains various provisions and covenants including, among other items, restrictions on the ability to pay dividends, incur additional indebtedness, issue capital stock, and commit to future capital expenditures.  We have agreed to maintain certain financial ratios, including interest coverage, and total net leverage ratios, all as defined in the credit agreement.  As of September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with our credit agreement covenants.

11.Derivatives

In order to manage the risk associated with changes in interest rates, we have entered into interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert a portion of our floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis, thereby reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future cash interest payments.  We account for these transactions as cash flow hedges under the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 815 (“ASC 815”), Derivatives and Hedging.  The swaps are designated as cash flow

10

hedges of our expected future interest payments.  In a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the change in the fair value of the hedging derivative is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss and is subsequently reclassified into earnings during the same period in which the hedged item affects earnings.  The change in fair value of any ineffective portion of the hedging derivative is recognized immediately in earnings.

We currently have in place interest rate swap agreements whereby we receive 3-month LIBOR-based interest payments from the swap counterparties and pay a fixed rate.  We also have interest rate swap agreements whereby we make 3-month LIBOR-based payments, less a fixed percentage to a counterparty and receive 1-month LIBOR.  The combination effectively hedges the interest payments based on 1-month LIBOR resets on a portion of our credit facility.  The net effect of these swaps is that we pay a weighted-average fixed rate of 4.36% to our swap counterparties on $605 million of notional amount and receive 1-month LIBOR less a fixed percentage.  The weighted average fixed percentage received was 0.06% for the third quarter of 2010.

We also have in place $200 million notional amount of forward floating to fixed interest rate swap agreements that will become effective on December 31, 2010 and a $100 million notional amount forward fixed to floating interest rate swap agreement that becomes effective on September 30, 2011.  Under the forward swap agreements that become effective on December 31, 2010, we will make fixed payments to the swap counterparties at a weighted-average fixed rate of 1.83% and receive 1-month LIBOR.  The December 2010 forward swap agreements have a maturity date of March 31, 2013.  For the swap agreement that becomes effective on September 30, 2011, we will make fixed payments to the swap counterparty at a weighted-average fixed rate of 1.65% and receive 1-month LIBOR.  The September 2011 forward swap agreement has a maturity date of September 30, 2013.

At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, approximately 68.75% of our outstanding debt was fixed through the use of interest rate swaps.

The counterparties to our various swaps are 5 major U.S. and European banks.  None of the swap agreements provide for either Consolidated or the counterparties to post collateral nor do the agreements include any covenants related to the financial condition of Consolidated or the counterparties.  The swaps of any counterparty that is a “Lender” as defined in our credit facility are secured along with the other creditors under the credit facility.  Each of the swap agreements provides that in the event of a bankruptcy filing by either Consolidated or the counterparty, any amounts owed between the two parties would be offset in order to determine the net amount due between parties.  This provision allows us to partially mitigate the risk of non-performance by a counterparty.

We report the gross fair value of our derivatives in either Prepaid expenses and other current assets, Current portion of derivative liability or Other long-term liabilities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  The table below shows the balance sheet classification and fair value of our interest rate swaps designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:

	Fair Value
	September 30,			December 31,
(In thousands)	2010			2009
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	33		$	—
Current portion of derivative liability	(10,176		)	(6,074		)
Other long-term liabilities	(25,402		)	(26,105		)

Information regarding our cash flow hedge transactions is as follows:

11

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In thousands)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Loss/(gain) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss (“OCI”)	$	1,677		$	(225	)	$	3,508		$	10,293
Loss/(Gain) arising from ineffectiveness increasing/(reducing) interest expense	$	(62	)	$	7		$	(142	)	$	(55	)
Losses reclassed from OCI to interest expense	$	1,037		$	2,884		$	3,953		$	8,764

	September 30,
(In thousands)	2010		2009
Aggregate notional value of current derivatives outstanding	$	605,000	$	680,000
Aggregate notional value of forward derivatives outstanding	$	300,000	$	—
Period through which derivative positions currently exist	September 2013		March 2013
Loss in fair value of derivatives	$	35,545	$	37,559
Deferred losses included in OCI (pretax)	$	35,399	$	37,219
Losses included in OCI to be recognized in the next 12 months	$	1,990	$	6,239
Number of months over which loss in OCI is to be recognized	30		42

12.Interest Expense, Net

The following table summarizes interest expense, net:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended  September 30,
(In thousands)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Interest expense — credit facility	$	6,325		$	6,272		$	18,574		$	19,266
Payments on swap liabilities, net	6,264			7,833			18,727			22,685
Other interest	165			280			653			697
Amortization of deferred financing fees	323			323			970			970
Uncertain tax position interest accrual	(1,265		)	109			(1,037		)	322
Capitalized interest	(48		)	(32		)	(133		)	(99		)
Total interest expense	11,764			14,785			37,754			43,841
Less: interest income	(41		)	(10		)	(79		)	(47		)
Total interest expense, net	$	11,723		$	14,775		$	37,675		$	43,794

For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, we reversed a net $1.3 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of accrued interest as a result of a change in our uncertain tax liabilities for which the statue of limitations expired on September 30, 2010.

13.Retirement and Pension Plans

We have 401(k) plans covering substantially all of our employees.  We recognized expense with respect to these plans of $0.6 million for each of the three month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and $1.9 and $2.0 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  Contributions made under our defined contribution plans include a match, at the Company’s discretion, of employee salaries contributed to the plans.

12

Qualified Retirement Plan

We sponsor a defined-benefit pension plan (“Retirement Plan”) that is non-contributory covering substantially all of our hourly employees who fulfill minimum age and service requirements.  Certain salaried employees are also covered by the Retirement Plan, although these benefits have previously been frozen.

The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost for the qualified retirement plan for the three and nine month periods ended September 30:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In thousands)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Service cost	$	475		$	527		$	1,409		$	1,582
Interest cost	2,799			2,775			8,367			8,325
Expected return on plan assets	(2,544		)	(2,355		)	(7,636		)	(7,066		)
Net amortization loss	211			668			590			2,005
Prior service credit amortization	(11		)	(10		)	(33		)	(32		)
Net periodic pension cost	$	930		$	1,605		$	2,697		$	4,814

Non-qualified Pension Plan

The Company also has non-qualified supplemental pension plans (“Restoration Plans”), which we acquired as part of our North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. (“North Pittsburgh”) and TXU Communications Venture Company (“TXUCV”) acquisitions.  The Restoration Plans cover certain former employees of our North Pittsburgh and TXUCV operations.  The Restoration Plans restore benefits that were precluded under the Retirement Plan by Internal Revenue Service limits on compensation and benefits applicable to qualified pension plans, and by the exclusion of bonus compensation from the Retirement Plan’s definition of earnings.  The Restoration Plans are unfunded and have no assets, and benefits paid under the Restoration Plans come from the general operating funds of the Company.

The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost for the Restoration Plans for the three and nine months ended September 30:

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In thousands)	2010		2009		2010		2009
Service cost	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Interest cost	14		14		44		42
Net amortization loss	8		8		23		24
Net periodic pension cost	$	22	$	22	$	67	$	66

Other Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Agreements

We also are liable for deferred compensation agreements with former members of the board of directors and certain other former employees of a subsidiary of TXUCV, which was acquired in 2004.  The benefits are payable for up to the life of the participant and may begin as early as age 65 or upon the death of the participant.  Participants accrue no new benefits as these plans had previously been frozen by TXUCV’s predecessor company prior to our acquisition of TXUCV.  Payments related to the

13

deferred compensation agreements totaled approximately $0.1 million for the three month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and $0.4 million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.  The net present value of the remaining obligations was approximately $2.9 million at September 30, 2010 and $3.1 million at December 31, 2009, and is included in pension and postretirement benefit obligations in the accompanying balance sheets.

We also maintain 40 life insurance policies on certain of the participating former directors and employees.  We did not recognize any proceeds in other income for the three or nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 or 2009 due to the receipt of life insurance proceeds.  The excess of the cash surrender value of the remaining life insurance policies over the notes payable balances related to these policies is determined by an independent consultant, and totaled $1.3 million at September 30, 2010 and $1.8 million at December 31, 2009.  These amounts are included in investments in the accompanying balance sheets.  Cash principal payments for the policies and any proceeds from the policies are classified as operating activities in the statements of cash flows.

14.Postretirement Benefit Obligation

We sponsor a healthcare plan and life insurance plan that provides postretirement medical benefits and life insurance to certain groups of retired employees.  Retirees share in the cost of healthcare benefits, making contributions that are adjusted periodically—either based upon collective bargaining agreements or because total costs of the program have changed.  We generally pay the covered expenses for retiree health benefits as they are incurred.  Postretirement life insurance benefits are fully insured.  Our postretirement plan is unfunded and has no assets, and the benefits paid under the postretirement plan come from the general operating funds of the Company.

The following table summarizes the components of the net periodic costs for postretirement benefits for the three and nine months ended September 30:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In thousands)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Service cost	$	206		$	177		$	618		$	610
Interest cost	530			450			1,591			1,609
Net prior service cost amortization	(112		)	(240		)	(336		)	(722		)
Net amortization gain	—			(5		)	—			(16		)
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost	$	624		$	382		$	1,873		$	1,481

In March 2010, President Obama signed into law comprehensive health care reform legislation under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (the “Acts”).  Based on our analyses to date, we do not currently believe the provisions within the Acts will result in a material remeasurement of our postretirement health care liabilities.  We will continue to assess the accounting implications of the Acts as related regulations and interpretations of the Acts become available.  The actual extent of impact cannot be actuarially determined until related regulations are promulgated under the Acts and additional interpretations of the Acts become available.  Provisions within the Acts which may cause financial impacts to our postretirement health care liabilities that are possible, but not currently determinable, include application of the excise tax on high-cost employer coverage.  We do not expect the other provisions within the Acts to materially impact our postretirement health care liabilities or results of operations.

14

15.Other Long-Term Liabilities

Other long-term liabilities are as follows:

(In thousands)	September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Long-term derivative liabilities	$	25,402	$	26,105
Uncertain tax positions	1,475		5,638
Accrued interest on uncertain tax positions	38		1,061
Other long-term liabilities	577		635
Total	$	27,492	$	33,439

16.Stock-based Compensation Plans

Pretax stock-based compensation expense for the three and nine month periods ended September 30 was as follows:

	Three Months Ended September  30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In thousands)	2010		2009		2010		2009
Restricted stock	$	338	$	275	$	1,015	$	826
Performance shares	283		226		725		608
Total	$	621	$	501	$	1,740	$	1,434

Stock-based compensation expense is included in “selling, general and administrative expenses” in the accompanying statements of operations.

As of September 30, 2010, we had not yet recognized compensation expense on the following non-vested awards.

(Dollars in thousands)	Non-recognized Compensation		Average Remaining Recognition Period (years)
Restricted stock	$	2,072	1.3
Performance shares	1,425		1.0
Total	$	3,497	1.2

The following table summarizes unvested restricted stock awards outstanding and changes during the nine month periods ended September 30:

	2010				2009
	# of  Shares		Price(1)		# of  Shares		Price(1)
Non-vested restricted shares outstanding — January 1	82,375		$	12.08	74,391		$	16.62
Shares granted	115,949		18.65		96,447		9.05
Shares vested	(3,000	)	13.00		(6,000	)	13.45
Shares cancelled	(2,875	)	14.24		(2,375	)	13.04
Non-vested restricted shares outstanding — September 30	192,449		$	15.99	162,463		$	12.30

(1)Represents the weighted—average fair value on date of grant.

15

The following table summarizes unvested performance share-based restricted stock awards outstanding and changes during the nine month periods ended September 30:

	2010				2009
	# of  Shares		Price(1)		# of  Shares		Price(1)
Non-vested performance shares outstanding — January 1	46,578		$	11.72	31,137		$	15.68
Shares granted	98,002		18.65		61,544		9.05
Shares vested	—		—		(1,202	)	13.42
Shares cancelled	(3,070	)	15.75		(864	)	12.09
Non-vested performance shares outstanding — September 30	141,510		$	16.43	90,615		$	11.24

(1)Represents the weighted—average fair value on date of grant.

17.Income Taxes

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded a net decrease of $4.6 million to our liability for uncertain tax positions which reduced our tax expense for the year to date period.  The net decrease included a decrease of $5.4 million due to the expiration of the federal statute of limitations and an increase of $0.8 million related to 2009 state income tax filings.  As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had recorded $1.1 million and $5.7 million, respectively, of uncertain tax positions.  The total amount of uncertain tax positions that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $1.1 million.  We do not expect any changes in our uncertain tax positions during the remainder of 2010.

Our practice is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in interest expense and general and administrative expense, respectively.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded a net decrease to interest expense of $1.0 million related to uncertain tax positions.  This net decrease included a decrease of $1.4 million in interest expense due to the expiration of the federal statute of limitations in the third quarter of 2010 and an increase to interest expense of $0.4 million during the year related to the current year accrual of interest on our uncertain tax positions.  At September 30, 2010, we had recorded $38 thousand of interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions, of which $15 thousand was recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

The only periods subject to examination for our federal returns are years 2007 through 2009.  The periods subject to examination for our state returns are years 2006 through 2009.  We are currently under examination by state tax authorities.  We do not expect any settlement or payment that may result from the audit to have a material effect on our results of operations or cash flows.

Our effective tax rate was (9.61)% and 25.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively and 21.1% and 35.1%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  Our effective tax rate is lower in 2010 due primarily to the reversal of the net $4.6 million in uncertain tax positions.  Our effective tax rates differ from the federal and state statutory rates primarily due to state tax planning and the changes to our state tax reporting structure resulting from the completion of internal restructuring and related intercompany agreements.

We filed 2009 tax returns for the Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. consolidated filing group and East Texas Fiber Line during the third quarter of 2010.  We filed 2008 tax returns for the Consolidated Communications Holding, Inc. consolidated filing group and East Texas Fiber Line

16

during the third quarter of 2009.  We recognized approximately $0.3 million of tax benefit in the third quarter of 2010 to adjust our 2009 provision to match our 2009 returns, and $0.9 million of tax benefit in the third quarter of 2009 to adjust our 2008 provision to match our 2008 returns.

18.Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss,

Accumulated other comprehensive loss is comprised of the following components at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

(In thousands)	2010			2009
Fair value of cash flow hedges	$	(35,399	)	$	(31,891	)
Prior service credits and net losses on postretirement plans	(23,985		)	(24,229		)
	(59,384		)	(56,120		)
Deferred taxes	21,776			20,580
Totals	$	(37,608	)	$	(35,540	)

The components of comprehensive income are as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In thousands)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net income	$	11,967		$	7,283		$	26,192		$	18,639
Other comprehensive loss:
Prior service cost and net loss, net of tax	61			259			156			780
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax	(1,061		)	(143		)	(2,224		)	6,540
Total comprehensive income	10,967			7,399			24,124			25,959
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest	130			226			385			769
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders	$	10,837		$	7,173		$	23,739		$	25,190

19.Environmental Remediation Liabilities

Environmental remediation liabilities were $0.3 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and are included in other liabilities.  These liabilities, which relate to anticipated remediation and monitoring costs, are undiscounted.  The Company believes the amount accrued is adequate to cover the remaining anticipated costs of remediation.

20.Litigation and Contingencies

On April 15, 2008, Salsgiver Inc., a Pennsylvania-based telecommunications company, and certain of its affiliates filed a lawsuit against us and our subsidiaries North Pittsburgh Telephone Company and North Pittsburgh Systems Inc. in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, alleging that we have prevented Salsgiver from connecting their fiber optic cables to our utility poles.  Salsgiver seeks compensatory and punitive damages as the result of alleged lost projected profits, damage to its business reputation, and other costs.  It claims to have sustained losses of approximately $125 million, but does not request a specific dollar amount in damages.  We believe that these claims are without merit and that the alleged damages are completely unfounded.  We intend to defend against these claims vigorously.  In the third quarter of 2008, we filed preliminary objections and responses to Salsgiver’s complaint.  However, the court ruled against our preliminary objections.  On November 3, 2008, we responded to Salsgiver’s amended complaint and filed a counter-claim for trespass, alleging that Salsgiver attached cables to our poles without an authorized agreement and in an unsafe manner.  We are currently in the discovery and deposition stage.  In addition, we have asked the

17

FCC Enforcement Bureau to address Salsgiver’s unauthorized pole attachments and safety violations on those attachments.  We believe that these are violations of an FCC order regarding Salsgiver’s complaint against us. We do not believe that these claims will have a material adverse impact on our financial results.

We are from time to time involved in various other legal proceedings and regulatory actions arising out of our operations.  We do not believe that any of these, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect upon our business, operating results or financial condition.

21.Net Income per Common Share

The following illustrates the earnings allocation method as required by the FASB’s authoritative guidance on the treatment of participating securities in the calculation of earnings per share which we utilize in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	2010		2009		2010		2009
Basic Earnings Per Share Using Two-class Method:
Net income	$	11,967	$	7,283	$	26,192	$	18,639
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest	130		226		385		769
Net income attributable to common shareholders before allocation of earnings to participating securities	11,837		7,057		25,807		17,870
Less: earnings allocated to participating securities	124		90		305		271
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	11,713	$	6,967	$	25,502	$	17,599
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding	29,483		29,389		29,483		29,388
Net income per common share attributable to common stockholders - basic	$	0.40	$	0.24	$	0.86	$	0.60
Diluted Earnings Per Share Using Two-class Method:
Net income	$	11,967	$	7,283	$	26,192	$	18,639
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest	130		226		385		769
Net income attributable to common shareholders before allocation of earnings to participating securities	11,837		7,057		25,807		17,870
Less: earnings allocated to participating securities	124		90		305		271
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	11,713	$	6,967	$	25,502	$	17,599
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding	29,483		29,389		29,483		29,388
Net income per common share attributable to common stockholders - diluted	$	0.40	$	0.24	$	0.86	$	0.60

We had additional potential dilutive securities including unvested restricted shares and performance shares outstanding representing 0.3 million common shares that were not included in the computation of potentially dilutive securities at either September 30, 2010 and 2009, because they were anti-dilutive or the achievement of performance conditions had not been met at the end of the period.

18

22.Business Segments

The Company is viewed and managed as two separate, but highly integrated, reportable business segments: “Telephone Operations” and “Other Operations.”  Telephone Operations consists of a wide range of telecommunications services, including local and long-distance service, VOIP service, custom calling features, private line services, dial-up and DSL Internet access, IPTV, carrier access services, network capacity services over a regional fiber optic network, mobile services and directory publishing.  The Company also operates a number of complementary non-core businesses that comprise “Other Operations,” including telephone services to county jails and state prisons, equipment sales and operator services.  Management evaluates the performance of these business segments based upon net revenue, operating income, and income before extraordinary items.

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In thousands)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Telephone operations	$	87,297		$	91,279		$	263,793		$	274,117
Other operations	8,279			10,311			25,822			31,225
Total net revenue	95,576			101,590			289,615			305,342
Operating expense — telephone operations	50,293			52,128			150,057			158,538
Operating expense — other operations	7,764			9,623			23,782			29,385
Total operating expense	58,057			61,751			173,839			187,923
Depreciation and amortization — telephone operations	21,687			21,043			64,260			63,071
Depreciation and amortization — other operations	231			298			660			927
Total depreciation expense	21,918			21,341			64,920			63,998
Operating income — telephone operations	15,317			18,108			49,476			52,508
Operating income - other operations	284			390			1,380			913
Total operating income	15,601			18,498			50,856			53,421
Interest expense, net	(11,723		)	(14,775		)	(37,675		)	(43,794		)
Investment income	6,830			6,237			20,268			18,046
Other, net	210			(183		)	(242		)	1,032
Income before income taxes	$	10,918		$	9,777		$	33,207		$	28,705
Capital expenditures:
Telephone operations	$	10,735		$	10,497		$	32,479		$	30,802
Other operations	19			80			95			150
Total	$	10,754		$	10,577		$	32,574		$	30,952

	September 30,		December 31,
(In thousands)	2010		2009
Goodwill:
Telephone operations	$	519,541	$	519,541
Other operations	1,021		1,021
Total	$	520,562	$	520,562
Total assets:
Telephone operations (1)	$	1,198,837	$	1,214,329
Other operations	9,223		12,278
Total	$	1,208,060	$	1,226,607

19

(1)  Included within the telephone operations segment assets are our equity method investments totaling $49.3 million and $49.6 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

23.Subsequent Events

On October 21, 2010, our employees belonging to the Communications Workers of America Local 6218 approved a new three year contract with the Company, effective as of October 16, 2010 and expiring on October 15, 2013, which covers 180 bargained for employees at our Lufkin, TX and Conroe, TX locations.

20

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion of our consolidated operating results and financial condition for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this report.

“Consolidated Communications” or the “Company” refers to Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. alone or with its wholly owned subsidiaries as the context requires.  When this report uses the words “we,” “our,” or “us,” they refer to the Company and its subsidiaries.

Forward-Looking Statements

Any statements contained in this Report that are not statements of historical fact, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements and should be evaluated as such. The words “anticipates”, “believes”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “estimates”, “targets”, “projects”, “should”, “may”, “will” and similar words and expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.  These forward-looking statements are contained throughout this Report, including, but not limited to, statements found in this Part I — Item 2 — “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, Part I — Item 3 — “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” and Part II — Item 1 — “Legal Proceedings”.  Such forward-looking statements reflect, among other things, our current expectations, plans, strategies, and anticipated financial results and involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including but not limited to:

·various risks to stockholders of not receiving dividends and risks to our ability to pursue growth opportunities if we continue to pay dividends according to our current dividend policy;

·the current volatility in economic conditions and the financial markets;

·adverse changes in the value of assets or obligations associated with our employee benefit plans;

·various risks to the price and volatility of our common stock;

·our substantial amount of debt and our ability to incur additional debt in the future;

·our need for a significant amount of cash to service and repay our debt and to pay dividends on our common stock;

·restrictions contained in our debt agreements that limit the discretion of our management in operating our business;

·the ability to refinance our existing debt as necessary;

·rapid development and introduction of new technologies and intense competition in the telecommunications industry;

·risks associated with our possible pursuit of future acquisitions;

·the length and severity of weakened economic conditions in our service areas in Illinois, Texas and Pennsylvania;

·system failures;

·loss of large customers or government contracts;

·risks associated with the rights-of-way for our network;

·disruptions in our relationship with third party vendors;

·loss of key management personnel and the inability to attract and retain highly qualified management and personnel in the future;

21

·changes in the extensive governmental legislation and regulations governing telecommunications providers, the provision of telecommunications services and access charges and  subsidies, which are a material part of our revenues;

·telecommunications carriers disputing and/or avoiding their obligations to pay network access charges for use of our network;

·high costs of regulatory compliance;

·the competitive impact of legislation and regulatory changes in the telecommunications industry;

·liability and compliance costs regarding environmental regulations; and

·the additional risk factors outlined in Part I — Item 1A — “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and the other documents that we file with the SEC from time to time that could cause our actual results to differ from our current expectations and from the forward-looking statements discussed in this Report.

Many of these risks are beyond our ability to control or predict.  All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained throughout this Report.  Because of these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.  Furthermore, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made.   Except as required under the federal securities laws or the rules and regulations of the SEC, we do not undertake any obligation to update or review any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview

We are an established rural local exchange company that provides communications services to residential and business customers in Illinois, Texas, and Pennsylvania. We offer a wide range of telecommunications services, including local and long-distance service, digital telephone (“VOIP”), custom calling features, private line services, dial-up and high-speed broadband Internet access (“DSL”), internet protocol digital television (“IPTV”), carrier access services, network capacity services over our regional fiber optic network, directory publishing and competitive local exchange carrier (“CLEC”) calling services.  We also operate a number of non-core complementary businesses, including providing telephone services to county jails and state prisons and equipment sales.

Executive Summary

We generated net income attributable to common stockholders of $11.8 million, or $0.40 per diluted share in the third of quarter of 2010, as compared to net income attributable to common stockholders of $7.1 million, or $0.24 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2009.  Net income in the third quarter of 2010 benefited primarily from a reduction in both income tax and interest expense due to the reversal of tax liabilities previously recorded on uncertain tax positions.  The statute of limitations for these uncertain tax positions expired on September 30, 2010.  Interest expense in the third quarter of 2010 was also lower as a result of the expiration of fixed interest rate swaps in 2009.  We also benefited in the third quarter of 2010 from lower selling, general and administrative costs and improved earnings from our wireless partnerships.  Higher depreciation expense in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to 2009 also impacted results.  Operating expenses declined principally due to lower pension expense and professional fees, and lower integration and restructuring costs.  The operating expense reductions were offset somewhat by higher video equipment and programming costs.  Operating expenses in the third quarter of 2009 included $1.4 million of integration and restructuring expense for which we are receiving cost savings on an ongoing basis.

22

Revenue in the third quarter of 2010 decreased to $95.6 million as compared to $101.6 million in the third quarter of 2009.  Decreased revenue in the third quarter of 2010 resulted primarily from the sale of our telemarketing business in the first quarter of 2010, along with local access line loss, reduced subsidy payments and lower operator services revenue.  These were partially offset by increases in DSL and IPTV subscriptions and increased revenue in our public services business.

For the first nine months of 2010, net income attributable to common stockholders totaled $25.8 million, or $0.86 per diluted share, as compared to $17.9 million, or $0.60 per diluted share, in the first nine months of 2009.  Net income in the first nine months of 2010 benefited from lower tax and interest expense as a result of the reversal of liabilities for uncertain tax positions, increased earnings from our wireless partnerships, significantly lower operating expenses and lower interest costs as a result of interest rate swaps expiring in the second half of 2009.  These were offset by higher depreciation expense.  Operating expenses in the first nine months of 2009 also included $5.4 million of integration and restructuring expense.

Late in the first quarter of 2010, we completed the sale of our telemarketing business, the assets and revenues of which were immaterial to our overall results of operations.

General

The following general factors should be considered in analyzing our results of operations:

Revenues

Telephone Operations and Other Operations.  Our revenues are derived primarily from the sale of voice and data communication services to residential and business customers in our rural telephone companies’ service areas.  Because we operate primarily in rural service areas, we do not anticipate significant growth in revenues in our Telephone Operations segment except through acquisitions.  However, we do expect fairly consistent cash flow from year to year because of fairly stable customer demand, and a generally supportive regulatory environment.

Local access lines and bundled services. An “access line” is the telephone line connecting a home or business to the public switched telephone network.  The number of local access lines in service directly affects the monthly recurring revenue we generate from end users, the amount of traffic on our network, the access charges we receive from other carriers, the federal and state subsidies we receive, and most other revenue streams.  We had 239,695, 247,235 and 250,370 local access lines, respectively, in service as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009.

Most wireline telephone companies have experienced a loss of local access lines due to challenging economic conditions and increased competition from wireless providers, competitive local exchange carriers and, in some cases, cable television operators.  We have not been immune to these conditions.  Cable competitors in all of our markets offer a competing voice product.  We estimate that cable companies have the capability to offer voice service to all of their addressable customers, covering 85% of our entire service territory.  We expect to continue to experience modest erosion in access lines due to market forces.

We have been able in some instances to offset the decline in local access lines with increased average revenue per access line by:

23

·Aggressively promoting DSL service, including selling DSL as a stand-alone offering;

·Value bundling services, such as DSL or IPTV, with a combination of local service and custom calling features;

·Maintaining excellent customer service standards; and

·Keeping a strong local presence in the communities we serve.

We have implemented a number of initiatives to gain new local access lines and retain existing lines by making bundled service packages more attractive (for example, by adding unlimited long-distance) and by announcing special promotions, like discounted second lines.  We also market a “triple play” bundle, which includes local telephone service, DSL, and IPTV.

As of September 30, 2010, IPTV was available to approximately 203,000 homes in our markets.  Our IPTV subscriber base continues to grow and totaled 27,953, 23,127 and 21,518 subscribers at September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively.

We also continue to experience growth in the number of DSL subscribers we serve.  We had 104,933, 100,122 and 97,750 DSL lines in service as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively.  Currently, over 95% of our rural telephone companies’ local access lines are DSL-capable.

In addition to our access line, DSL and video initiatives, we intend to continue to integrate best practices across our markets. We also continue to look for ways to enhance current products and introduce new services to ensure that we remain competitive and continue to meet our customers’ needs. These initiatives have included:

·Hosted VOIP service in all of our markets to meet the needs of small- to medium-sized business customers that want robust functionality without having to purchase a traditional key or PBX phone system;

·VOIP service for residential customers, which is being offered to our customers as a growth opportunity and as an alternative to the traditional phone line for customers who are considering a switch to a cable competitor;

·DSL service—even to users who do not have our access line—which expands our customer base and creates additional revenue-generating opportunities;

·Metro-Ethernet services delivered over our copper infrastructure with speeds of 25 mbps to 40 mbps;

·DSL product with speeds up to 20 mbps for those customers desiring greater Internet speed; and

·High definition video service and digital video recorders in all of our IPTV markets.

These efforts may mitigate the financial impact of any access line loss we experience.

Expenses

Our primary operating expenses consist of the cost of services; selling, general and administrative expenses; and depreciation and amortization expenses.

Cost of services and products.Our cost of services includes the following:

·Operating expenses relating to plant costs, including those related to the network and general support costs, central office switching and transmission costs, and cable and wire facilities;

24

·General plant costs, such as testing, provisioning, network, administration, power, and engineering;

·The cost of transport and termination of long-distance and private lines outside our rural telephone companies’ service area; and

·Video equipment and programming costs.

We have agreements with various carriers to provide long-distance transport and termination services.   We believe we will meet all of our commitments in these agreements and will be able to procure services for periods after our current agreements expire.  We do not expect any material adverse effects from any changes in any new service contract.

Selling, general and administrative expenses.  Selling, general and administrative expenses include expenses associated with customer care; billing and other operating support systems; and corporate expenses, such as professional service fees and non-cash, stock-based compensation.

Our operating support and back-office systems enter, schedule, provision, and track customer orders; test services and interface with trouble management; and operate inventory, billing, collections, and customer care service systems for the local access lines in our operations.  We have migrated most key business processes onto a single company-wide system and platform.  We hope to improve profitability by reducing individual company costs through centralizing, standardizing, and sharing best practices.  We incurred $5.4 million of integration and restructuring expenses as expected during the first nine months of 2009.

Depreciation and amortization expenses.  The provision for depreciation on property and equipment is recorded using the straight-line method based upon the following useful lives:

Years
Buildings	18 - 40
Network and outside plant facilities	3 - 50
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	3 - 15
Capital Leases	11

Amortization expenses are recognized primarily on our intangible assets considered to have finite useful lives on a straight-line basis. In accordance with the applicable authoritative guidance, goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are not amortized but rather are tested at least annually for impairment.  Because tradenames have been determined to have indefinite lives, they are not amortized.  Customer relationships are amortized over their useful life.  The net carrying value of customer lists at September 30, 2010 is being amortized at a remaining weighted-average life of approximately 3.0 years.

Results of Operations

Segments

We have two reportable business segments, Telephone Operations and Other Operations.  The results of operations discussed below reflect our consolidated results.

25

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to September 30, 2009

The following summarizes our revenues and operating expenses on a consolidated basis for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

	2010					2009
(In millions, except for percentages)	$			%		$			%
Revenue
Telephone operations
Local calling services	$	22.7		23.7		$	24.3		23.9
Network access services	19.9			20.8		20.9			20.6
Subsidies	12.7			13.3		14.5			14.3
Long-distance services	4.4			4.6		4.9			4.8
Data and Internet services	19.3			20.2		17.4			17.1
Other services	8.3			8.7		9.3			9.2
Total telephone operations	87.3			91.3		91.3			89.9
Other operations	8.3			8.7		10.3			10.1
Total operating revenue	95.6			100.0		101.6			100.0
Expenses
Telephone operations	50.3			52.6		52.2			51.4
Other operations	7.8			8.2		9.6			9.4
Depreciation and amortization	21.9			22.9		21.3			21.0
Total operating expense	80.0			83.7		83.1			81.8
Income from operations	15.6			16.3		18.5			18.2
Interest expense, net	(11.7		)	(12.2	)	(14.8		)	(14.6	)
Other income	7.0			7.4		6.1			6.1
Income tax benefit/(expense)	1.0			1.0		(2.5		)	(2.5	)
Net income	11.9			12.4		7.3			7.2
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest	0.1			0.1		0.2			0.2
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	11.8		12.3		$	7.1		7.0

Revenue

Revenue in the three month period ended September 30, 2010 declined by $6.0 million, or 5.9%, to $95.6 million from $101.6 million in the three month period ended September 30, 2009.  Overall, the decline in revenue was principally the result of our exit of the telemarketing business in the first quarter of 2010 which had little to no impact on earnings, a decrease in subsidy revenue caused by a change to the national average cost per loop component of the federal high cost fund, and by a reduction in the number of access lines which reduced revenue for local calling services, network access services and long-distance, all partially offset by revenue gains in our DSL and IPTV products.

Access line loss has slowed in 2010 while the growth in the number of broadband connections continues to outpace the decline in access lines.  VOIP, DSL and IPTV connections all increased during the third quarter 2010 as compared to 2009.  Connections by type are as follows:

26

	September 30,
	2010	2009
Residential access lines in service	141,980	148,857
Business access lines in service	97,715	101,513
Total local access lines in service	239,695	250,370
IPTV subscribers	27,953	21,518
ILEC DSL subscribers	104,933	97,750
Total broadband connections	132,886	119,268
VOIP subscribers	8,770	8,562
CLEC access line equivalents (1)	73,313	71,723
Total connections	454,664	449,923
Long-distance lines (2)	172,030	166,859
Dial-up subscribers	1,559	3,017

(1)  CLEC access line equivalents represent a combination of voice services and data circuits.  The calculations represent a conversion of data circuits to an access line basis.  Equivalents are calculated by converting data circuits (basic rate interface, primary rate interface, DSL, DS-1, DS-3 and Ethernet) and SONET-based (optical) services (OC-3 and OC-48) to the equivalent of an access line.

(2) Reflects the inclusion of long-distance service provided as part of our VOIP offering while excluding CLEC long-distance subscribers.

Telephone Operations Revenue

Local calling services revenue decreased by $1.6 million, or 6.6%, to $22.7 million in the third quarter of 2010 compared to $24.3 million in the third quarter of 2009.  The decrease is primarily due to a decline in local line revenue caused by lower access lines.  We continue to see access line loss moderating.

Network access services revenue decreased by $1.0 million, or 4.8%, to $19.9 million in the third quarter of 2010 compared to $20.9 million in the third quarter of 2009.  The decrease is primarily due to a decline in switched access minutes of use, and to a lesser extent, a decline in subscriber line charge revenue as a result of access line loss.

Subsidy revenue decreased by $1.8 million, or 12.4%, to $12.7 million in the third quarter of 2010 compared to $14.5 million in the third quarter of 2009.  The decrease is principally the result of a change to the national average cost per loop component of the federal high cost fund along with a decline in interstate common line revenue.

Long-distance services revenue decreased by $0.5 million, or 10.2%, to $4.4 million in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to $4.9 million in the third quarter of 2009.  The decrease is primarily due to a decline in billable minutes as a result of unlimited long-distance plans.

Data and Internet revenue increased by $1.9 million, or 10.9%, to $19.3 million in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to $17.4 million in the third quarter of 2009.  The increase is primarily due to an increase in the number of DSL and IPTV subscribers.

Other services revenue declined by $1.0 million, or 10.8%, to $8.3 million in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to $9.3 million in the third quarter of 2009.  The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in transport revenues.

27

Other Operations Revenue

Other Operations revenue decreased by $2.0 million, or 19.4%, to $8.3 million in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to $10.3 million in the third quarter of 2009.  Declines in revenue resulting from the sale of our telemarketing business and from a decrease in incoming calls in our operator services business were offset by increases in our prison systems business and from our equipment sales and installation business.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses decreased in the third quarter of 2010 by $3.7 million, or 6.0%, to $58.1 million as compared to $61.8 million in the third quarter of 2009 as a result of management’s continued focus on cost control.  Reductions in operating expenses by segment are discussed below.

Telephone Operations Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for Telephone Operations decreased by $1.9 million, or 3.6%, to $50.3 million in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to $52.2 million in the third quarter of 2009.  The decrease in Telephone Operations operating expenses was principally driven by reduced professional fees and lower SG&A taxes, along with lower integration and restructuring costs.  These were offset somewhat by higher video equipment and programming fees, higher interconnection costs and an increase in our provision for bad debt.  In 2009, we incurred $1.4 million in integration and restructuring charges during the third quarter.

Other Operations Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for Other Operations decreased by $1.8 million, or 18.8%, to $7.8 million in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to $9.6 million in the third quarter of 2009.  Operating expenses in our Other Operations Segment declined as a result of lower costs (including lower salaries and benefits) related to the disposition of our telemarketing business during the first quarter of 2010 offset somewhat by higher commissions in our public services business and higher cost of sales in our equipment and installation business as a result of higher sales.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $21.9 million during the third quarter of 2010, as compared to $21.3 million in the third quarter of 2009.  Depreciation and amortization expense increased period over period primarily due to increased spending on video equipment which has a relatively shorter depreciation life.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net of interest income, declined by $3.1 million, or 20.9%, to $11.7 million for the third quarter of 2010 as compared to $14.8 million in the third quarter of 2009.  Interest expense in the third quarter of 2010 declined primarily as a result of the reversal of a net $1.3 million of interest expense related to uncertain tax positions for which the statute of limitations expired on September 30, 2010.  Interest expense during the third quarter of 2010 also benefited from the expiration of $135 million of floating to fixed interest rate swaps during the second half of 2009, as the fixed rates paid on the swaps were at a significantly higher rate than the LIBOR rates we received in return.

28

Other Income (Expense)

Other income increased $0.9 million to $7.0 million in the third quarter of 2010 compared to $6.1 million in the third quarter of 2009.  The increase was principally the result of improved earnings from our wireless partnership interests.

Income Taxes

Our provision for income taxes was a $1.0 million benefit in 2010 as compared to $2.5 million in income tax expense in 2009.  Our effective rate was (9.6)% for the third quarter of 2010 as compared to 25.5% for the third quarter of 2009.  During the third quarter of 2010, we recognized a net decrease of $4.6 million to our liability for uncertain tax positions which reduced our tax expense for the period by a corresponding amount.  The net decrease included a decrease of $5.4 million due to the expiration of the federal statute of limitations and an increase of $0.8 million related to 2009 state income tax filings.  We also recognized approximately $0.3 million as a tax benefit in the third quarter of 2010 to adjust our 2009 provision to match our 2009 returns versus $0.9 million of tax benefit in the third quarter of 2009 to adjust our 2008 provision to match our 2008 returns.  Exclusive of these adjustments, our effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2010 and 2009 would have been approximately 35.3% and 34.6%, respectively.  Our effective tax rates differ from the federal and state statutory rates primarily due to state tax planning and the changes to our state tax reporting structure resulting from the completion of internal restructuring and related intercompany agreements.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest

The net income attributable to noncontrolling interest was $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2010 versus $0.2 million in the third quarter of 2009.

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to September 30, 2009

The following summarizes our revenues and operating expenses on a consolidated basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

29

	2010					2009
(In millions, except for percentages)	$			%		$			%
Revenue
Telephone operations
Local calling services	$	69.7		24.1		$	73.3		24.0
Network access services	62.0			21.4		65.0			21.3
Subsidies	36.7			12.7		42.0			13.8
Long-distance services	13.8			4.8		15.8			5.2
Data and Internet services	56.0			19.3		50.5			16.5
Other services	25.6			8.8		27.5			9.0
Total telephone operations	263.8			91.1		274.1			89.8
Other operations	25.8			8.9		31.2			10.2
Total operating revenue	289.6			100.0		305.3			100.0
Expenses
Telephone operations	150.1			51.8		158.5			51.9
Other operations	23.8			8.2		29.4			9.6
Depreciation and amortization	64.9			22.4		64.0			21.0
Total operating expense	238.8			82.5		251.9			82.5
Income from operations	50.8			17.5		53.4			17.5
Interest expense, net	(37.6		)	(13.0	)	(43.7		)	(14.3	)
Other income	20.0			6.9		19.1			6.3
Income tax expense	(7.0		)	(2.4	)	(10.1		)	(3.4	)
Net income	26.2			9.0		18.7			6.1
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest	0.4			0.1		0.8			0.2
Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	25.8		8.9		$	17.9		5.9

Revenue

Revenue in the first nine months of 2010 declined by $15.7 million, or 5.1%, to $289.6 million from $305.3 million in the first nine months of 2009.  Overall, the decline in revenue was the result of our exit from the telemarketing business which occurred during the first quarter of 2010, and from declines in revenue associated with our traditional wireline telephone business including: local calling services, network access, subsidy payments and long-distance services.  Declines in local access lines are being replaced by increases in broadband connections.  VOIP, DSL and IPTV connections all increased during the first nine months of 2010 as compared to 2009.

Telephone Operations Revenue

Local calling services revenue decreased by $3.6 million, or 4.9%, to $69.7 million in the first nine months of 2010 compared to $73.3 million in the first nine months of 2009.  The decrease is primarily due a decline in local line revenues as a result of the decline in local access lines.  We continue to see lower line losses in 2010 as compared to 2009.

Network access services revenue decreased by $3.0 million, or 4.6%, to $62.0 million in the first nine months of 2010 compared to $65.0 million in the first nine months of 2009.  The decrease is primarily due to a decline in switched access minutes of use, and to a lesser extent, a decline in special access revenue.  These decreases were partially offset by higher universal service charge revenues billed to customers.

30

Subsidy revenue decreased by $5.3 million, or 12.6%, to $36.7 million in the first nine months of 2010 compared to $42.0 million in the first nine months of 2009.  The decrease is principally the result of a change in the national average cost per loop component of the federal high cost fund, along with a decline in interstate common line revenue.

Long-distance services revenue decreased by $2.0 million, or 12.7%, to $13.8 million in the first nine months of 2010 as compared to $15.8 million in the first nine months of 2009.  The decrease is primarily due to a decline in billable minutes, primarily due to unlimited long-distance plans.

Data and Internet revenue increased by $5.5 million, or 10.9%, to $56.0 million in the first nine months of 2010 as compared to $50.5 million in the first nine months of 2009.  The increase is primarily due to an increase in the number of DSL and IPTV subscribers.

Other services revenue decreased $1.9 million, or 6.9%, to $25.6 million in the first nine months of 2010 as compared to $27.5 million in the first nine months of 2009.  The decrease was primarily the result of decreases in transport and directory service revenues.

Other Operations Revenue

Other Operations revenue decreased by $5.4 million, or 17.3%, to $25.8 million in the first nine months of 2010 as compared to $31.2 million in the first nine months of 2009.  The decline in revenue principally resulted from the sale of our telemarketing business in the first quarter of 2010.  This decline was partially offset by increases in revenue from our public services and equipment sales and installation businesses.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses decreased in the first nine months of 2010 by $14.0 million, or 7.5%, to $173.9 million as compared to $187.9 million in the first nine months of 2009 as a result of management’s continued focus on cost control..  Reductions in operating expenses by segment are discussed below.

Telephone Operations Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for Telephone Operations decreased by $8.4 million, or 5.3%, to $150.1 million in the first nine months of 2010 as compared to $158.5 million in the first nine months of 2009.  The decrease in Telephone Operations operating expenses was principally driven by lower salary and benefit expense, lower pension expense and professional fees, along with lower integration and restructuring costs.  These were offset somewhat by higher video equipment and programming fees, and interconnection charges.  During the first nine months of 2009, we incurred $5.4 million in integration and restructuring charges that has resulted in ongoing cost savings.

Other Operations Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for Other Operations decreased by $5.6 million, or 19.0%, to $23.8 million in the first nine months of 2010 as compared to $29.4 million in the first nine months of 2009.  Operating expenses in our Other Operations segment declined primarily as a result of lower costs related to the disposition of our telemarketing business during the first quarter of 2010 offset somewhat by higher commissions for our public services business as a result of higher sales.

31

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $64.9 million for the first nine months of 2010 as compared to $64.0 million for the first nine months of 2009.  The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to increased spending on video equipment which has a relatively shorter depreciation period.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net of interest income, declined by $6.1 million, or 14.0%, to $37.6 million in the first nine months of 2010 as compared to $43.7 million in the first nine months of 2009.  Interest expense in the first nine months of 2010 benefited from a net $1.0 million reversal of previously accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions and from the expiration of $135 million of floating to fixed interest rate swaps during the second half of 2009, as the fixed rates paid on the swaps were at a significantly higher rate than the LIBOR rates we received in return.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income was $20.0 million during the first nine months of 2010 as compared to $19.1 million during the first nine months of 2009.  Other income in 2010 was affected positively by improved earnings from our wireless partnership interests and negatively by a loss on the sale of real estate.  Other income in 2009 was positively affected by the settlement of a dispute with Verizon.

Income Taxes

Our provision for income taxes was $7.0 million for the first nine months of 2010 compared to $10.1 million for the first nine months of 2009.  Our effective tax rate was 21.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to 35.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recognized a net decrease of $4.6 million to our liability for uncertain tax positions which reduced our tax expense for the year to date period by a corresponding amount.  The net decrease included a decrease of $5.4 million due to the expiration of the federal statute of limitations and an increase of $0.8 million related to 2009 state income tax filings.  We also recognized approximately $0.3 million of tax benefit during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to adjust our 2009 provision to match our 2009 returns versus $0.9 million of tax benefit in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to adjust our 2008 provision to match our 2008 returns.  Exclusive of these adjustments, our effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 would have been approximately 35.9% and 38.2%, respectively.  Our effective tax rates differ from the federal and state statutory rates primarily due to state tax planning and the changes to our state tax reporting structure resulting from the completion of internal restructuring and related intercompany agreements.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest

The net income attributable to noncontrolling interest totaled $0.4 million in the first nine months of 2010 versus $0.8 million in the first nine months of 2009.  The income for our East Texas Fiber Line, Inc. subsidiary (a joint venture owned 63% by the Company and 37% by Eastex Celco) declined period over period.

32

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Outlook and Overview

The following table sets forth selected information concerning our financial condition.

(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2010		December 31,  2009
Cash and cash equivalents	$	55,961	$	42,758
Working capital	49,113		30,488
Total debt	880,000		880,344
Current ratio	1.65		1.39

Our operating requirements have historically been funded from cash flows generated from our business and borrowings under our credit facilities.  We expect that our future operating requirements will continue to be funded from cash flows generated from our business and, if needed, from borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

As a general matter, we expect that our liquidity needs for the fourth quarter of 2010 will arise primarily from: (i) dividend payments of between $11.5 million and $12.0 million; (ii) interest payments on our indebtedness of between $12.0 million and $13.0 million; (iii) capital expenditures of between $8.5 million and $9.5 million; (iv) cash income tax payments; (v) pension, 401(k) and other post retirement contributions of approximately $1.2 million; and (vi) certain other costs.  In addition, we may use cash and incur additional debt to fund selective acquisitions.  However, our ability to use cash may be limited by our other expected uses of cash, including our dividend policy, and our ability to incur additional debt will be limited by our existing and future debt agreements.

We believe that cash flows from operating activities, together with our existing cash and borrowings available under our revolving credit facility, will be sufficient for the next twelve months to fund our currently anticipated uses of cash.  After that, our ability to fund these expected uses of cash and to comply with the financial covenants under our debt agreements will depend on the results of future operations, performance and cash flow.  Our ability to do so will be subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business, regulatory, legislative and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.

We may be unable to access the cash flows of our subsidiaries since certain of our subsidiaries are parties to credit or other borrowing agreements, or subject to statutory or regulatory restrictions, that restrict the payment of dividends or making intercompany loans and investments, and those subsidiaries are likely to continue to be subject to such restrictions and prohibitions for the foreseeable future.  In addition, future agreements that our subsidiaries may enter into governing the terms of indebtedness may restrict our subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends or advance cash in any other manner to us.

To the extent that our business plans or projections change or prove to be inaccurate, we may require additional financing or require financing sooner than we currently anticipate.  Sources of additional financing may include commercial bank borrowings, other strategic debt financing, sales of nonstrategic assets, vendor financing or the private or public sales of equity and debt securities.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flows from operations in the future, that anticipated revenue growth will be realized, or that future borrowings or equity issuances will be available in amounts sufficient to provide adequate sources of cash to fund our expected uses of cash.  Failure to obtain adequate financing, if necessary, could require us to significantly reduce our operations or level of capital expenditures which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and the results of operations.

33

As discussed below, our term loan has been fully funded at a fixed spread above LIBOR and we have $50 million available under our revolving credit facility.   Based on our discussion with banks participating in the bank group, we expect that the funds will be available under the revolving credit facility if necessary.

Sources of Liquidity

Our current principal sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, cash available under our secured revolving credit facility, and cash provided by operations.

Cash and cash equivalents.  For the first nine months of 2010, cash and cash equivalents increased by $13.2 million.

Cash provided by operations.  Net cash provided by operating activities in the first nine months of 2010 was $79.7 million, as compared to cash provided by operating activities of $82.2 million in the first nine months of 2009.  Cash provided by operations in 2010 decreased primarily as a result of month end timing of accounts payable payments from year to year and from an increase in tax payments, offset partially by reduced payments to our pension plans.

Cash available under our secured revolving credit facility.  At September 30, 2010, we had no borrowings outstanding under our secured revolving credit facility and $50 million of availability.

Uses of Liquidity

Our principal uses of liquidity are dividend payments, interest expense and other payments on our debt, capital expenditures and payments made to fund our pension and other postretirement obligations.

Dividend payments.  We used $11.6 million and $11.5 million of cash to make dividend payments to shareholders during the third quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively.  We used $34.7 million and $34.5 million of cash to make dividend payments to shareholders during the first nine months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.  Our current quarterly dividend rate is approximately $0.38 per share.

Interest and other payments related to outstanding debt.  During the third quarter of 2010, we used $12.7 million of cash to make required interest payments on our outstanding debt.  We also used $0.1 million of cash in the first quarter of 2010 to reduce our capital lease obligations.  For the first nine months of 2010, we used $37.5 million of cash to make required interest payments on our outstanding debt and $0.3 million of cash on our capital lease obligations.

Pension and postretirement obligations.  In the first nine months of 2010, we used $4.2 million of cash to fund pension, 401(k) and other postretirement obligations.

Capital expenditures.  We spent approximately $10.8 million in the third quarter of 2010 on capital projects, and $32.6 million for the first nine months of 2010.

Debt

The following table summarizes our indebtedness as of September 30, 2010:

34

(In thousands)	Balance		Maturity Date	Rate (1)
Revolving credit facility	$	—	December 31, 2013	LIBOR plus 2.75%
Term loan	$	880,000	December 31, 2014	LIBOR plus 2.50%

(1)As of September 30, 2010, the 1-month LIBOR rate in effect on our borrowings was 0.26%.

Credit Facilities

Borrowings under our credit agreement are secured by substantially all of our assets (other than our Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company subsidiary, and certain future subsidiaries).  The credit agreement contains customary affirmative covenants, which require us and our subsidiaries to furnish specified financial information to the lenders, comply with applicable laws, maintain our properties and assets and maintain insurance on our properties, among others, and contains customary negative covenants which restrict our and our subsidiaries’ ability to incur additional debt and issue capital stock, create liens, repay other debt, sell assets, make investments, loans, guarantees or advances, pay dividends, repurchase equity interests or make other restricted payments, engage in affiliate transactions, make capital expenditures, engage in mergers, acquisitions or consolidations, enter into sale-leaseback transactions, amend specified documents, enter into agreements that restrict dividends from subsidiaries and change the business we conduct.  In addition, the credit agreement requires us to comply with specified financial ratios that are summarized below under “—Covenant Compliance”.

As of September 30, 2010, we had no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility.  Borrowings under our credit facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, at the borrowers’ election, either a “base rate” or LIBOR.  As of September 30, 2010, the applicable margin for interest rates is 2.50% per year for the LIBOR-based term loan and 2.75% for the revolving credit facility.  The applicable margin for alternative base rate loans is 1.50% per year for the term loan and 1.75% for the revolving credit facility.  For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the weighted-average interest rate incurred on our term loan facility, including payments made under our interest rate swap agreement, was 5.58% per annum.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the weighted-average interest rate incurred on our term loan facility, including payments made under our interest rate swap agreement, was 5.59% per annum.

Derivative Instruments

As of September 30, 2010, we had $605 million notional amount of floating to fixed interest rate swap agreements outstanding and $605 million notional amount of basis swaps outstanding.  Under the floating to fixed swap agreements, we receive 3-month LIBOR-based interest payments from the swap counterparties and pay a fixed rate.  Under the basis swaps, we pay 3-month LIBOR-based payments less a fixed percentage to the basis swap counterparties, and receive 1-month LIBOR.  Concurrent with the execution of the basis swaps, we began electing 1-month LIBOR resets on our credit facility.  The swaps are in place to hedge the change in overall cash flows related to our term loan, the driver of which is changes in the underlying variable interest rate.

We also have in place $200 million notional amount of forward floating to fixed interest rate swap agreements that will become effective on December 31, 2010 and a $100 million notional amount forward fixed to floating interest rate swap agreement that becomes effective on September 30, 2011.  Under the forward swap agreements that become effective on December 31, 2010, we will make fixed payments to the swap counterparties at a weighted-average fixed rate of 1.83% and receive 1-month LIBOR.  The December 2010 forward swap agreements have a maturity date of March 31, 2013.  For

35

the swap agreement that becomes effective on September 30, 2011, we will make fixed payments to the swap counterparty at a weighted-average fixed rate of 1.65% and receive 1-month LIBOR.  The September 2011 forward swap agreement has a maturity date of September 30, 2013.

Covenant Compliance

In general, our credit agreement restricts our ability to pay dividends to the amount of our Available Cash accumulated after October 1, 2005, plus $23.7 million and minus the aggregate amount of dividends paid after July 27, 2005.  Available Cash for any period is defined in our credit facility as Consolidated EBITDA (a) minus, to the extent not deducted in the determination of Consolidated EBITDA, (i) non-cash dividend income for such period; (ii) consolidated interest expense for such period net of amortization of debt issuance costs incurred (A) in connection with or prior to the consummation of the acquisition of North Pittsburgh or (B) in connection with the redemption of our then outstanding senior notes; (iii) capital expenditures from internally generated funds; (iv) cash income taxes for such period; (v) scheduled principal payments of indebtedness, if any; (vi) voluntary repayments of indebtedness, mandatory prepayments of term loans and net increases in outstanding revolving loans during such period; (vii) the cash costs of any extraordinary or unusual losses or charges; and (viii) all cash payments made on account of losses or charges expensed prior to such period (b) plus, to the extent not included in Consolidated EBITDA, (i) cash interest income; (ii) the cash amount realized in respect of extraordinary or unusual gains; and (iii) net decreases in revolving loans.  Based on the results of operations from October 1, 2005 through September 30, 2010, and after taking into consideration dividend payments (including the $11.6 million dividend declared in August 2010 and paid on November 1, 2010), we continue to have $125.9 million in dividend availability under the credit facility covenant.

Under our credit agreement, if our total net leverage ratio (as such term is defined in the credit agreement), as of the end of any fiscal quarter, is greater than 5.10:1.00, we will be required to suspend dividends on our common stock unless otherwise permitted by an exception for dividends that may be paid from the portion of proceeds of any sale of equity not used to make mandatory prepayments of loans and not used to fund acquisitions, capital expenditures or make other investments.  During any dividend suspension period, we will be required to repay debt in an amount equal to 50.0% of any increase in available cash (as such term is defined in our credit agreement) during such dividend suspension period, among other things.  In addition, we will not be permitted to pay dividends if an event of default under the credit agreement has occurred and is continuing.  Among other things, it will be an event of default if our interest coverage ratio as of the end of any fiscal quarter is below 2.25:1.00.  As of September 30, 2010, our total net leverage ratio was 4.79:1.00 and our interest coverage ratio was 3.59:1.00.

The descriptions of the covenants above and of our credit agreement generally in this Report are summaries only.  They do not contain a full description, including definitions, of the provisions summarized.  As such, these summaries are qualified in their entirety by these documents, which are filed as exhibits to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.

Dividends

The cash required to fund dividend payments is in addition to our other expected cash needs, which we expect to fund with cash flows from our operations.  In addition, we expect we will have sufficient availability under our revolving credit facility to fund dividend payments in addition to any expected fluctuations in working capital and other cash needs, although we do not intend to borrow under this facility to pay dividends.

36

We believe that our dividend policy will limit, but not preclude, our ability to grow.  If we continue paying dividends at the level currently anticipated under our dividend policy, we may not retain a sufficient amount of cash, and expect to seek refinancing, to fund a material expansion of our business, including any significant acquisitions or to pursue growth opportunities requiring capital expenditures significantly beyond our current expectations.  In addition, because we expect a significant portion of cash available will be distributed to holders of common stock under our dividend policy, our ability to pursue any material expansion of our business will depend more than it otherwise would on our ability to obtain third-party financing.

Surety Bonds

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into surety, performance, and similar bonds.  As of September 30, 2010, we had approximately $2.1 million of these bonds outstanding.

Subsequent Events

On October 21, 2010, our employees belonging to the Communications Workers of America Local 6218 approved a new three year contract with the Company, effective as of October 16, 2010 and expiring on October 15, 2013, which covers 180 bargained for employees at our Lufkin, TX and Conroe, TX locations.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates.  Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market interest rates on our variable rate obligations.  We calculate the potential change in interest expense caused by changes in market interest rates by determining the effect of the hypothetical rate increase on the portion of our variable rate debt that is not hedged through the interest rate swap agreements.

During the first nine months of 2010, the interest rate on approximately $275.0 million of our floating rate debt was not fixed through the use of interest rate swaps, thereby subjecting this portion of our debt to potential changes in interest rates.   If market interest rates changed by 1.0% from the average rates that prevailed during the first nine months of this year, interest expense would have increased or decreased by approximately $2.1 million for this nine month period.

As of September 30, 2010, the fair value of our interest rate swap agreements amounted to a liability of $22.5 million, net of deferred taxes, which is recognized as a deferred loss within accumulated other comprehensive loss.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.  Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30,

37

2010.  Based upon that evaluation and subject to the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.  No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during our fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

38

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

On April 15, 2008, Salsgiver Inc., a Pennsylvania-based telecommunications company, and certain of its affiliates filed a lawsuit against us and our subsidiaries North Pittsburgh Telephone Company and North Pittsburgh Systems Inc. in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, alleging that we have prevented Salsgiver from connecting their fiber optic cables to our utility poles.  Salsgiver seeks compensatory and punitive damages as the result of alleged lost projected profits, damage to its business reputation, and other costs.  It claims to have sustained losses of approximately $125 million but does not request a specific dollar amount in damages.  We believe that these claims are without merit and the alleged damages are completely unfounded.  We intend to defend against these claims vigorously. In the third quarter of 2008, we filed preliminary objections and responses to Salsgiver’s complaint.  However, the court ruled against our preliminary objections.  On November 3, 2008, we responded to Salsgiver’s amended complaint and filed a counter-claim for trespass, alleging that Salsgiver attached cables to our poles without an authorized agreement and in an unsafe manner.  We are currently in the discovery and deposition stage.  In addition, we have asked the FCC Enforcement Bureau to address Salsgiver’s unauthorized pole attachments and safety violations on those attachments.  We believe that these are violations of a FCC order regarding Salsgiver’s complaint against us.  We do not believe that these claims will have a material adverse impact on our financial results.

We are from time to time involved in various other legal proceedings and regulatory actions arising out of our operations.  We do not believe that any of these, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect upon our business, operating results or financial condition.

Item 1A.         Risk Factors

The Company included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2009 a description of certain risks and uncertainties that could affect the Company’s business, future performance or financial condition (“Risk Factors”).

Item 2.            Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

Item 3.            Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4.            [Removed and Reserved]

Item 5.            Other Information

None

39

Item 6. Exhibits

(a)Exhibits

31.1Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

40

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
November 5, 2010		By:	/s/ Robert J. Currey
			Robert J. Currey
			President and Chief Executive Officer
			(Principal Executive Officer)
November 5, 2010		By:	/s/ Steven L. Childers
			Steven L. Childers
			Chief Financial Officer
			(Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)

41