FORM 10-Q

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q


(Mark One)
þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
		or
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 001-32312

Novelis Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Canada (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		98-0442987 (I.R.S. employer identification number)

3399 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 1500 Atlanta, Georgia (Address of principal executive offices)		30326 (Zip Code)

Telephone: (404) 814-4200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer þ	Smaller reporting company o
	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of October 31, 2008, the registrant had 77,459,658 common shares outstanding. All of the Registrant’s outstanding shares were held indirectly by Hindalco Industries Ltd., the Registrant’s parent company.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1.	*Financial Statements*

Novelis Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (unaudited)
(in millions)


	Three Months						Six Months			May 16, 2007			April 1, 2007
	Ended						Ended			Through			Through
	September 30,						September 30,			September 30,			May 15,
	2008			2007			2008			2007			2007
				(Restated)						(Restated)
	Successor			Successor			Successor			Successor			Predecessor
Net sales	$	2,959		$	2,821		$	6,062		$	4,368		$	1,281

Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)		2,791			2,555			5,622			3,991			1,205
Selling, general and administrative expenses		89			88			173			130			95
Depreciation and amortization		107			103			223			156			28
Research and development expenses		10			10			22			23			6
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net		41			56			81			81			26
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net		185			30			119			16			(20	)
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates		(2	)		(20	)		—			(19	)		(1	)
Sale transaction fees		—			—			—			—			32
Other (income) expenses — net		10			(2	)		32			9			4

		3,231			2,820			6,272			4,387			1,375

Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) and minority interests’ share		(272	)		1			(210	)		(19	)		(94	)
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)		(169	)		20			(134	)		47			4

Income (loss) before minority interests’ share		(103	)		(19	)		(76	)		(66	)		(98	)
Minority interests’ share		—			—			(2	)		2			1

Net income (loss)		(103	)		(19	)		(78	)		(64	)		(97	)

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Currency translation adjustment		(73	)		27			(63	)		14			31
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges		(16	)		2			3			4			(1	)
Postretirement benefit plans:
Amortization of net actuarial loss		—			—			—			—			(1	)
Change in pension and other benefits		2			—			2			—			—

Other comprehensive income (loss) before income tax effect		(87	)		29			(58	)		18			29
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive income (loss)		6			2			(2	)		12			4

Other comprehensive income (loss) — net of tax		(81	)		31			(60	)		30			33

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(184	)	$	12		$	(138	)	$	(34	)	$	(64	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Novelis Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)

(in millions, except number of shares)


	As of
	September 30,			March 31,
	2008			2008
				(Restated)
	Successor			Successor

ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	219		$	326
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $1 as of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008)
— third parties		1,347			1,248
— related parties		24			31
Inventories		1,413			1,455
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		75			58
Current portion of fair value of derivative instruments		237			203
Deferred income tax assets		186			125

Total current assets		3,501			3,446
Property, plant and equipment — net		3,032			3,357
Goodwill		1,864			1,869
Intangible assets — net		827			888
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates		924			946
Fair value of derivative instruments — net of current portion		46			21
Deferred income tax assets		10			12
Other long-term assets
— third parties		91			102
— related parties		29			41

Total assets	$	10,324		$	10,682


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	14		$	15
Short-term borrowings		351			115
Accounts payable
— third parties		1,418			1,582
— related parties		57			55
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		965			850
Deferred income tax liabilities		34			39

Total current liabilities		2,839			2,656
Long-term debt — net of current portion		2,544			2,560
Deferred income tax liabilities		557			701
Accrued postretirement benefits		420			421
Other long-term liabilities		457			672

		6,817			7,010

Commitments and contingencies

Minority interests in equity of consolidated affiliates		122			149

Shareholder’s equity
Common stock, no par value; unlimited number of shares authorized; 77,459,658 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		3,497			3,497
Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit)		(98	)		(20	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(14	)		46

Total shareholder’s equity		3,385			3,523

Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity	$	10,324		$	10,682

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Novelis Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited) (in millions)


	Six Months			May 16, 2007			April 1, 2007
	Ended			Through			Through
	September 30,			September,			May 15,
	2008			2007			2007
				(Restated)
	Successor			Successor			Predecessor
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)	$	(78	)	$	(64	)	$	(97	)
Adjustments to determine net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		223			156			28
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net		119			16			(20	)
Deferred income taxes		(183	)		—			(18	)
Amortization of debt issuance costs		3			7			1
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments — net		(124	)		(82	)		—
Foreign exchange remeasurement on non-working capital items — net		17			(2	)		—
Gain on reversal of accrued legal claim		(26	)		—			—
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable		—			1			—
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates		—			(19	)		(1	)
Dividends from non-consolidated affiliates		—			—			4
Minority interests’ share		2			(2	)		(1	)
Impairment charges on long-lived assets		1			—			—
(Gain) loss on sales of property, plant and equipment and business — net		(2	)		—			—
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
— third parties		(183	)		54			(21	)
Inventories		(71	)		105			(76	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(25	)		(2	)		(7	)
Other long-term assets		9			(2	)		(1	)
Accounts payable
— third parties		(33	)		(124	)		(62	)
— related parties		9			3			—
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		(74	)		(57	)		42
Accrued postretirement benefits		22			8			1
Other long-term liabilities		4			7			(2	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(390	)		3			(230	)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures		(70	)		(57	)		(17	)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment		2			1			—
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates		13			3			1
Proceeds from loans receivable — net — related parties		13			10			—
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments		94			72			18

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		52			29			2

(Continued)

Novelis Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited) (in millions) — (Continued)


	Six Months			May 16, 2007			April 1, 2007
	Ended			Through			Through
	September 30,			September 30,			May 15,
	2008			2007			2007
				(Restated)
	Successor			Successor			Predecessor
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		—			92			—
Proceeds from issuance of debt		—			960			150
Principal repayments		(7	)		(905	)		(1	)
Short-term borrowings — net		263			(65	)		60
Dividends — minority interests		(5	)		(1	)		(7	)
Debt issuance costs		—			(35	)		(2	)
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options		—			—			1

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		251			46			201

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(87	)		78			(27	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in foreign currencies		(20	)		1			1
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period		326			102			128

Cash and cash equivalents — end of period	$	219		$	181		$	102

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	82		$	102		$	13
Income taxes paid	$	67		$	31		$	9
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities related to the Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock (See Note 1):
Property, plant and equipment				$	(1,244	)
Goodwill				$	(1,866	)
Intangible assets				$	(859	)
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates				$	(610	)
Debt				$	66

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Novelis Inc.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY (unaudited)

(in millions, except number of shares)


							Retained			Accumulated
					Additional		Earnings			Other
	Common Stock				Paid-in		(Accumulated			Comprehensive
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit)			Income (Loss)			Total

*Successor*
Balance as of March 31, 2008 (Restated)		77,459,658	$	—	$	3,497	$	(20	)	$	46		$	3,523
Net income (loss)		—		—		—		(78	)		—			(78	)
Currency translation adjustment — net		—		—		—		—			(65	)		(65	)
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges — net		—		—		—		—			2			2
Postretirement benefit plans:
Change in pension and other benefits — net		—		—		—		—			3			3

Balance as of September 30, 2008		77,459,658	$	—	$	3,497	$	(98	)	$	(14	)	$	3,385

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)


1.	Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

References herein to “Novelis,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us” refer to Novelis Inc. and its subsidiaries unless the context specifically indicates otherwise. References herein to “Hindalco” refer to Hindalco Industries Limited. In October 2007, the Rio Tinto Group purchased all the outstanding shares of Alcan, Inc. References herein to “Alcan” refer to Rio Tinto Alcan Inc.

Description of Business and Basis of Presentation

Novelis Inc., formed in Canada on September 21, 2004, and its subsidiaries, is the world’s leading aluminum rolled products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum sheet and light gauge products where the end-use destination of the products includes the construction and industrial, beverage and food cans, foil products and transportation markets. As of September 30, 2008, we had operations on four continents: North America; Europe; Asia and South America, through 32 operating plants, one research facility and several market-focused innovation centers in 11 countries. In addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American businesses include bauxite mining, alumina refining, primary aluminum smelting and power generation facilities that are integrated with our rolling plants in Brazil.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2008 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on August 11, 2008. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to SEC Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading.

Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock and Predecessor and Successor Reporting

On May 15, 2007, the Company was acquired by Hindalco through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary pursuant to a plan of arrangement (the Arrangement) at a price of $44.93 per share. The aggregate purchase price for all of the Company’s common shares was $3.4 billion and Hindalco also assumed $2.8 billion of Novelis’ debt for a total transaction value of $6.2 billion. Subsequent to completion of the Arrangement on May 15, 2007, all of our common shares were indirectly held by Hindalco.

Our acquisition by Hindalco was recorded in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 103, Push Down Basis of Accounting Required in Certain Limited Circumstances. In the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, the consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in connection with the acquisition have been “pushed down” to us and have been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 141, Business Combinations. Due to the impact of push down accounting, the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements and certain note presentations for the six months ended September 30, 2007 are presented in two distinct periods to indicate the application of two different bases of accounting between the periods presented: (1) the period up to, and including, the acquisition date (April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, labeled “Predecessor”) and (2) the period after that date (May 16, 2007 through September 30, 2007, labeled “Successor”). The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include a black line division which indicates that the Predecessor and Successor reporting entities shown are not comparable.

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Interim Reporting

The unaudited results of operations for the interim periods shown in these condensed consolidated financial statements, including the periods shown as Predecessor and Successor, are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire fiscal year. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements recognize all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary to fairly state our consolidated financial position as of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008 (as restated); the consolidated results of our operations for (1) the three months ended September 30, 2008, (2) the six months ended September 30, 2008, (3) the three months ended September 30, 2007 (as restated), and (4) the periods from May 16, 2007 through September 30, 2007 (as restated) and (5) from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007; our consolidated cash flows for (1) the six months ended September 30, 2008, and (2) the periods from May 16, 2007 through September 30, 2007 (as restated) and from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007; and changes in our consolidated shareholder’s equity for the six months ended September 30, 2008 (restated as to opening balance).

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications of the prior period amounts and presentation have been made to conform to the presentation adopted for the current periods. The following reclassifications and presentation changes were made to the prior periods’ condensed consolidated statements of cash flows to conform to the current period presentation: (a) certain amounts previously presented in Accounts payable — third parties were reclassified to Foreign exchange remeasurement on non-working capital items — net. These reclassifications have no effect on total assets, total shareholder’s equity, net income (loss) or total cash flows as previously presented.

Dividends

Our board of directors has declared no dividends since October 26, 2006. Future dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on, among other things, our financial resources, cash flows generated by our business, our cash requirements, restrictions under the instruments governing our indebtedness, being in compliance with the appropriate indentures and covenants under the instruments that govern our indebtedness that would allow us to legally pay dividends and other relevant factors.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

The following accounting standards have been adopted by us during the six months ended September 30, 2008.

On April 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (FASB Statement No. 159). FASB Statement No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure financial instruments and certain other assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis (the “fair value option”) with changes in fair value reported in earnings each reporting period. The fair value option enables some companies to reduce the volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without applying the complex hedge accounting requirements under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FASB Statement No. 133), to achieve similar results. We already record our derivative contracts and hedging activities at fair value in accordance with FASB Statement No. 133. We did not elect the fair value option for any other financial instruments or certain other financial assets and liabilities that were not previously required to be measured at fair value.

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delayed our required adoption date of FASB Statement No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis, until April 1, 2009. Also in February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13, which states that FASB Statement No. 13, Accounting for Leases, and other accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement under FASB Statement No. 13 are excluded from the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157, except for assets and liabilities related to leases assumed in a business combination that are required to be measured at fair value under FASB Statement No. 141 or FASB Statement No. 141 (Revised), Business Combinations. See Note 13 — Fair Value Measurements regarding our adoption of this standard.

On April 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FIN 39-1, Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39, (FSP FIN 39-1). FSP FIN 39-1 amends FASB Statement No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts, by permitting entities that enter into master netting arrangements as part of their derivative transactions to offset in their financial statements net derivative positions against the fair value of amounts (or amounts that approximate fair value) recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral under those arrangements. Our adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

The following new accounting standards have been issued, but have not yet been adopted by us as of September 30, 2008, as adoption is not required until future reporting periods.

In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (FASB Statement No. 162). FASB Statement No. 162 defines the order in which accounting principles that are generally accepted should be followed. FASB Statement No. 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We have not yet commenced evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB Statement No. 162 on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 142-3, Determination of Useful Life of Intangible Assets, (FSP FAS 142-3). FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing the renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FSP FAS 142-3 also requires expanded disclosure related to the determination of intangible asset useful lives. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. We have not yet commenced evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FASB Statement No. 161), an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. FASB Statement No. 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133 and its related interpretations and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. FASB Statement No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption permitted.

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

FASB Statement No. 161 permits, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods upon initial adoption. As FASB Statement No. 161 only requires enhanced disclosures, this standard will have no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (Revised), Business Combinations, (FASB Statement No. 141(R)) which establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer in a business combination (i) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, (ii) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase, and (iii) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. FASB Statement No. 141(R) also requires acquirers to estimate the acquisition-date fair value of any contingent consideration and to recognize any subsequent changes in the fair value of contingent consideration in earnings. We will be required to apply this new standard prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. FASB Statement No. 141(R) amends certain provisions of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, such that adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of FASB Statement No. 141(R) would also apply the provisions of FASB Statement No. 141(R). Early adoption is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the effects that FASB Statement No. 141(R) may have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (FASB Statement No. 160), which establishes accounting and reporting standards that require: (i) the ownership interest in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be clearly identified and presented in the consolidated balance sheet within shareholder’s equity, but separate from the parent’s equity; (ii) the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of operations and (iii) changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be accounted for consistently. FASB Statement No. 160 applies to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. We have not yet commenced evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of FASB Statement No. 160 on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

We have determined that all other recently issued accounting standards will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, or do not apply to our operations.


2.	Restatement of Financial Statements

We have restated our consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2008 and for the period from May 16, 2007 through March 31, 2008. This restatement corrects non-cash errors relating to our application of purchase accounting associated with an equity method investment which led to a misstatement of our provision for income taxes during the period we were finalizing our purchase accounting. We also corrected other miscellaneous adjustments that were deemed to be not material by management, either individually or in the aggregate. These adjustments do not have an impact on our compliance with the financial covenants under our 7.25% Senior Notes or under our New Senior Secured Credit Facilities (see Note 8 — Debt). See our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on August 11, 2008 for details of these corrections, including the effects of the restatement on our March 31, 2008 balance sheet. Items in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes that have been restated are marked accordingly.

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

The following tables highlight the financial statement effects related to the above corrections for the period from May 16, 2007 through September 30, 2007.

Our condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the three months ended September 30, 2007 is restated as follows (in millions).


	Three Months
	Ended
	September 30, 2007
	As Previously						As
	Reported			Restatements			Restated
	Successor						Successor

Net sales	$	2,821		$	—		$	2,821

Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)		2,555			—			2,555
Selling, general and administrative expenses		88			—			88
Depreciation and amortization		102			1			103
Research and development expenses		10			—			10
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net		56			—			56
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net		36			(6	)		30
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates		4			(24	)		(20	)
Other (income) expenses — net		(7	)		5			(2	)

		2,844			(24	)		2,820

Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) and minority interests’ share		(23	)		24			1
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)		(36	)		56			20

Income (loss) before minority interests’ share		13			(32	)		(19	)
Minority interests’ share		—			—			—

Net income (loss)		13			(32	)		(19	)

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Currency translation adjustment		27			—			27
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges — net		2			—			2

Other comprehensive income (loss) before income tax effect		29			—			29
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive income (loss)		2			—			2

Other comprehensive income (loss) — net of tax		31			—			31

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	44		$	(32	)	$	12

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Our condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the period from May 16, 2007 through September 30, 2007 is restated as follows (in millions).


	May 16, 2007
	Through
	September 30, 2007
	As Previously						As
	Reported			Restatements			Restated
	Successor						Successor

Net sales	$	4,368		$	—		$	4,368

Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)		3,991			—			3,991
Selling, general and administrative expenses		130			—			130
Depreciation and amortization		155			1			156
Research and development expenses		23			—			23
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net		81			—			81
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net		22			(6	)		16
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates		5			(24	)		(19	)
Other (income) expenses — net		4			5			9

		4,411			(24	)		4,387

Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) and minority interests’ share		(43	)		24			(19	)
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)		—			47			47

Income (loss) before minority interests’ share		(43	)		(23	)		(66	)
Minority interests’ share		2			—			2

Net income (loss)		(41	)		(23	)		(64	)

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Currency translation adjustment		14			—			14
Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges — net		4			—			4

Other comprehensive income (loss) before income tax effect		18			—			18
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive income (loss)		12			—			12

Other comprehensive income (loss) — net of tax		30			—			30

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(11	)	$	(23	)	$	(34	)

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the period from May 16, 2007 through September 30, 2007 is restated as follows (in millions).


	May 16, 2007
	Through
	September 30, 2007
	As Previously						As
	Reported			Restatements			Restated
	Successor						Successor

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)	$	(41	)	$	(23	)	$	(64	)
Adjustments to determine net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		155			1			156
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net		22			(6	)		16
Deferred income taxes		(46	)		46			—
Amortization of debt issuance costs		7			—			7
Write-off and amortization of fair value adjustments — net		(82	)		—			(82	)
Foreign exchange remeasurement on non-working capital items — net		(2	)		—			(2	)
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable		1			—			1
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates		5			(24	)		(19	)
Minority interests’ share		(2	)		—			(2	)
Changes in assets and liabilities (net of effects from acquisitions and divestitures):
Accounts receivable — third parties		54			—			54
Inventories		105			—			105
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(2	)		—			(2	)
Other long-term assets		(2	)		—			(2	)
Accounts payable — third parties		(124	)		—			(124	)
Accounts payable — related parties		3			—			3
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		(57	)		—			(57	)
Accrued postretirement benefits		8			—			8
Other long-term liabilities		7			—			7

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		9			(6	)		3

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures		(57	)		—			(57	)
Proceeds from sales of assets		1			—			1
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates		3			—			3
Proceeds from loans receivable — net — related parties		10			—			10
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments		66			6			72

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		23			6			29

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		92			—			92
Proceeds from issuance of debt		960						960
Principal repayments		(905	)		—			(905	)
Short-term borrowings — net		(65	)		—			(65	)
Dividends — minority interests		(1	)		—			(1	)
Debt issuance costs		(35	)		—			(35	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		46			—			46

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		78			—			78
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in foreign currencies		1			—			1
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period		102			—			102

Cash and cash equivalents — end of period	$	181		$	—		$	181

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)


3.	Restructuring Programs

The following table summarizes the activity in our restructuring reserves (in millions).


										Other Exit
	Severance Reserves									Related Reserves								Total
				North									North					Restructuring
	Europe			America			Total			Europe			America		Total			Reserves

Successor:
Balance as of March 31, 2008	$	4		$	3		$	7		$	16		$	1	$	17		$	24
Provisions (recoveries) — net		—			(1	)		(1	)		—			—		—			(1	)
Cash payments		(1	)		—			(1	)		(1	)		—		(1	)		(2	)
Adjustments — other		—			2			2			—			—		—			2

Balance as of June 30, 2008		3			4			7			15			1		16			23
Cash payments		—			(2	)		(2	)		(2	)		—		(2	)		(4	)
Adjustments — other		(2	)		—			(2	)		(1	)		—		(1	)		(3	)

Balance as of September 30, 2008	$	1		$	2		$	3		$	12		$	1	$	13		$	16


4.	Inventories

Inventories consist of the following (in millions).


	As of
	September 30, 2008			March 31, 2008
	Successor			Successor

Finished goods	$	330		$	357
Work in process		570			638
Raw materials		428			386
Supplies		87			75

		1,415			1,456
Allowances		(2	)		(1	)

Inventories	$	1,413		$	1,455

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)


5.	Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment — net, consists of the following (in millions).


	As of
	September 30, 2008			March 31, 2008
				(Restated)
	Successor			Successor

Land and property rights	$	235		$	258
Buildings		805			826
Machinery and equipment		2,431			2,460

		3,471			3,544
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(518	)		(331	)

		2,953			3,213
Construction in progress		79			144

Property, plant and equipment — net	$	3,032		$	3,357

Total depreciation expense is shown in the table below (in millions). We capitalized no material amounts of interest on construction projects related to property, plant and equipment for the periods presented.

Three Months

Six Months

May 16, 2007

April 1, 2007

Ended

Through

September 30,

May 15,

2008

2007

2008

2007

(Restated)

Successor

Predecessor

Depreciation expense related to property, plant and equipment

203

142

The components of amortization expense related to intangible assets are as follows (in millions):


	Three Months						Six Months			May 16, 2007			April 1, 2007
	Ended						Ended			Through			Through
	September 30,						September 30,			September 30,			May 15,
	2008			2007			2008			2007			2007
	Successor			Successor			Successor			Successor			Predecessor
Total Amortization expense related to intangible assets	$	15		$	15		$	30		$	22		$	—
Less: Amortization expense related to intangible assets included in Cost of goods sold(A)		(5	)		(5	)		(10	)		(8	)		—

Amortization expense related to intangible assets included in Depreciation and amortization	$	10		$	10		$	20		$	14		$	—


(A)		Relates to amortization of favorable energy and other supply contracts.

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

6. Investment in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions

The following table summarizes the ownership structure and our ownership percentage of the non-consolidated affiliates in which we have an investment as of September 30, 2008, and which we account for using the equity method. We have no material investments in affiliates that we account for using the cost method.


		Ownership
Affiliate Name	Ownership Structure	Percentage

Aluminium Norf GmbH	Corporation Unincorporated Joint		50	%
Consorcio Candonga	Venture Limited Liability		50	%
MiniMRF LLC	Company		50	%
Deutsche Aluminium Verpackung Recycling GmbH	Corporation		30	%
France Aluminium Recyclage S.A.	Public Limited Company		20	%

The following table summarizes the condensed results of operations of our equity method affiliates (on a 100% basis, in millions) on a historical basis of accounting. These results do not include the incremental depreciation and amortization expense that we record in our equity method accounting, which arises as a result of the amortization of fair value adjustments we made to our investments in non-consolidated affiliates due to the Arrangement. For the three and six months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded $9 million and $18 million, respectively, for the incremental depreciation and amortization expense, net of tax, as part of our equity method accounting for these investments. For the three months ended September 30, 2007, we recorded incremental depreciation and amortization expense of $8 million, which was more than offset by $24 million of tax benefits associated with this amortization and a statutory tax rate change, as part of our equity method accounting for these investments. For the period from May 16, 2007 through September 30, 2007, we recorded incremental depreciation and amortization expense of $11 million, which was more than offset by $24 million of tax benefits associated with this amortization and a statutory tax rate change, as part of our equity method accounting for these investments.


	Three Months				Six Months		May 16, 2007		April 1, 2007
	Ended				Ended		Through		Through
	September 30,				September 30,		September 30,		May 15,
	2008		2007		2008		2007		2007

Net sales	$	167	$	138	$	324	$	223	$	45
Costs, expenses and provisions for taxes on income		146		130		288		211		43

Net income	$	21	$	8	$	36	$	12	$	2

Included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are transactions and balances arising from business we conduct with these non-consolidated affiliates, which we classify as related party transactions and balances. We earned less than $1 million of interest income on a loan due from Aluminium

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Norf GmbH during each of the periods presented in the table below. The following table describes the nature and amounts of significant transactions that we had with related parties (in millions).


	Three Months				Six Months		May 16, 2007		April 1, 2007
	Ended				Ended		Through		Through
	September 30,				September 30,		September 30,		May 15,
	2008		2007		2008		2007		2007
	Successor		Successor		Successor		Successor		Predecessor
Purchases of tolling services and electricity
Aluminium Norf GmbH(A)	$	74	$	66	$	147	$	106	$	21
Consorcio Candonga(B)		10		3		13		6		1

Total purchases from related parties	$	84	$	69	$	160	$	112	$	22


(A)		We purchase tolling services (the conversion of customer-owned metal) from Aluminium Norf GmbH.

(B)		We purchase electricity from Consorcio Candonga for our operations in South America.

The following table describes the period-end account balances that we have with these non-consolidated affiliates, shown as related party balances in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets (in millions). We have no other material related party balances.


	As of
	September 30, 2008		March 31, 2008
	Successor		Successor

Accounts receivable(A)	$	24	$	31
Other long-term receivables(A)	$	29	$	41
Accounts payable(B)	$	57	$	55


(A)		The balances represent current and non-current portions of a loan due from Aluminium Norf GmbH.

(B)		We purchase tolling services from Aluminium Norf GmbH and electricity from Consorcio Candonga.


7.	Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities are comprised of the following (in millions).


	As of
	September 30, 2008		March 31, 2008
	Successor		Successor

Accrued compensation and benefits	$	122	$	141
Accrued settlement of legal claim		—		39
Accrued interest payable		18		15
Accrued income taxes		3		35
Current portion of fair value of unfavorable sales contracts		225		242
Current portion of fair value of derivative instruments		385		148
Other current liabilities		212		230

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	965	$	850

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)


8.	Debt

Debt consists of the following (in millions).


				As of
				September 30, 2008									March 31, 2008
							Unamortized									Unamortized
	Interest						Fair Value			Carrying						Fair Value			Carrying
	Rates(A)			Principal			Adjustments(B)			Value			Principal			Adjustments(B)			Value
							Successor									Successor

Novelis Inc.
7.25% Senior Notes, due February 2015		7.25	%	$	1,399		$	63		$	1,462		$	1,399		$	67		$	1,466
Floating rate Term Loan facility, due July 2014		5.88	%		296			—			296			298			—			298
Novelis Corporation
Floating rate Term Loan facility, due July 2014		5.88	%(C)		652			—			652			655			—			655
Novelis Switzerland S.A.
Capital lease obligation, due January 2020 (Swiss francs (CHF) 52 million)		7.50	%		47			(3	)		44			54			(4	)		50
Capital lease obligation, due August 2011 (CHF 3 million)		2.49	%		3			—			3			3			—			3
Novelis Korea Limited
Bank loan, due October 2010		5.44	%		100			—			100			100			—			100
Bank loans, due September 2010 through June 2011 (Korean won (KRW) 400 million)		3.50	%(D)		—			—			—			1			—			1
Other
Other debt, due April 2009 through December 2012		1.40	%(D)		1			—			1			2			—			2

Total debt					2,498			60			2,558			2,512			63			2,575
Less: current portion					(14	)		—			(14	)		(15	)		—			(15	)

Long-term debt — net of current portion				$	2,484		$	60		$	2,544		$	2,497		$	63		$	2,560


(A)		Interest rates are as of September 30, 2008 and exclude the effects of accretion/amortization of fair value adjustments as a result of the Arrangement.

(B)		Debt was recorded at fair value as a result of the Arrangement.

(C)		Excludes the effect of related interest rate swaps.

(D)		Weighted average interest rate.

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Due to the change in the market price of our 7.25% Senior Notes from 105.25% of par value as of May 14, 2007 to 86% of par value as of September 30, 2008, the estimated fair value of this debt has decreased $270 million to $1.203 billion.

Interest Rate Swaps

During the quarter ended December 31, 2007, we entered into interest rate swaps to fix the variable London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) interest rate for up to $600 million of our floating rate Term Loan facility at effective weighted average interest rates and amounts expiring as follows: (i) 4.0% on $500 million through March 31, 2009 and (ii) 4.0% on $400 million through March 31, 2010. An interest rate swap at an interest rate of 4.1% on $100 million of our Term Loan facility expired on September 30, 2008. We are still obligated to pay any applicable margin, as defined in our New Credit Facilities, in addition to these interest rates.

As of September 30, 2008 approximately 76% of our debt was fixed rate and approximately 24% was variable rate.

Short-Term Borrowings and Lines of Credit

As of September 30, 2008, our short-term borrowings were $351 million consisting of (1) $328 million of short-term loans under our ABL facility, (2) a $10 million short-term loan in Italy and (3) $13 million in bank overdrafts. As of September 30, 2008, $20 million of our ABL facility was utilized for letters of credit and we had $364 million in remaining availability under this revolving credit facility.

The New Credit Facilities include customary affirmative and negative covenants. Under the ABL facility, if our excess availability, as defined under the borrowing, is less than 10% of the borrowing base, we are required to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1 to 1. As of September 30, 2008, our fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1 to 1. As a result, our borrowing availability is limited to 90% of the available borrowing base to avoid potential default of our financial covenants, resulting in a reduction of availability under our ABL facility of $80 million.

As of September 30, 2008, we had an additional $170 million outstanding under letters of credit in Korea not included in our revolving credit facility. The weighted average interest rate on our total short-term borrowings was 5.60% and 4.12% as of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, respectively.


9.	Share-Based Compensation

Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan

In June 2008, our board of directors authorized the Novelis Long-Term Incentive Plan FY 2009 — FY 2012 (2009 LTIP) covering the performance period from April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2012. Under the 2009 LTIP, stock appreciation rights (SARs) are to be granted to certain of our executive officers and key employees. The SARs will vest at the rate of 25% per year, subject to performance criteria (see below) and expire seven years from the date the plan was authorized by the board. Each SAR is to be settled in cash based on the difference between the market value of one Hindalco share on the date of grant compared to the date of exercise, converted from Indian rupees to the participant’s payroll currency at the time of exercise. The amount of cash paid would be limited to (i) 2.5 times the target payout if exercised within one year of vesting or (ii) 3 times the target payout if exercised after one year of vesting. The SARs do not transfer any shareholder rights in Hindalco to a participant. As of September 30, 2008, no SARs have been awarded.

The performance criterion for vesting is based on the actual overall Novelis Operating Earnings before Interest, Depreciation, Amortization and Taxes (Operating EBITDA, as defined in the 2009 LTIP) compared to

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

the target Operating EBITDA established and approved each fiscal year. The minimum threshold for vesting each year is 75% of each annual target Operating EBITDA, at which point 75% of the SARs for that period would vest, with an equal pro rata amount of SARs vesting through 100% achievement of the target.

Share-Based Compensation Expense

As a result of our acquisition by Hindalco on May 15, 2007, all of our share-based compensation awards (except for our Recognition Awards) were accelerated to vest, cancelled and settled in cash using the $44.93 purchase price per common share paid by Hindalco in the transaction. Compensation expense resulting from the accelerated vesting of plan awards, totaling $45 million is included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statement of operations for the period from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007. Compensation expense of $1 million was recognized during the period from May 16, 2007 through September 30, 2007.

On October 29, 2008, the board of directors approved an amendment to the 2009 LTIP (Amended 2009 LTIP). The design elements of the Amended 2009 LTIP are largely unchanged from the original 2009 LTIP. However, the Amended 2009 LTIP now specifies that (a) the plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, (b) all payments shall be made in cash upon exercise (less applicable withholdings), and (c) the Compensation Committee has the authority to make adjustments in the number and price of SARs covered by the plan in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of employees that would otherwise result from a change in the capital structure of the Company (e.g., dividends, stock splits, rights issuances, reorganizations, liquidation of assets, etc.).

For each of the three and six months ended September 30, 2008 and for the three months ended September 30, 2007, compensation expense related to share-based awards was less than $1 million.


10.	Postretirement Benefit Plans

Components of net periodic benefit cost for all of our significant postretirement benefit plans are shown in the tables below (in millions).


	Three Months						Six Months			May 16, 2007			April 1, 2007
	Ended						Ended			Through			Through
	September 30,						September 30,			September 30,			May 15,
	2008			2007			2008			2007			2007
	Successor			Successor			Successor			Successor			Predecessor
Pension Benefit Plans
Service cost	$	11		$	12		$	21		$	18		$	6
Interest cost		15			12			30			18			6
Expected return on assets		(13	)		(11	)		(26	)		(16	)		(5	)
Amortization — prior service cost		(1	)		—			(1	)		—			—
Curtailment/settlement losses		—			—			1			—			—

Net periodic benefit cost	$	12		$	13		$	25		$	20		$	7

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)


	Three Months				Six Months			May 16, 2007		April 1, 2007
	Ended				Ended			Through		Through
	September 30,				September 30,			September 30,		May 15,
	2008		2007		2008			2007		2007
	Successor		Successor		Successor			Successor		Predecessor
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
Service cost	$	1	$	1	$	3		$	2	$	1
Interest cost		2		2		5			3		1
Amortization — actuarial losses		1		—		1			—		—
Curtailment/settlement losses		—		—		(2	)		—		—

Net periodic benefit cost	$	4	$	3	$	7		$	5	$	2

The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is 6.9% in fiscal 2009.

Employer Contributions to Plans

For pension plans, our policy is to fund an amount required to provide for contractual benefits attributed to service to date, and amortize unfunded actuarial liabilities typically over periods of 15 years or less. We also participate in savings plans in Canada and the U.S., as well as defined contribution pension plans in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Malaysia and Brazil. We contributed the following amounts to all plans (in millions).


	Three Months				Six Months		May 16, 2007		April 1, 2007
	Ended				Ended		Through		Through
	September 30,				September 30,		September 30,		May 15,
	2008		2007		2008		2007		2007
	Successor		Predecessor		Successor		Successor		Predecessor
Funded pension plans	$	7	$	11	$	11	$	16	$	4
Unfunded pension plans		4		4		8		6		2
Savings and defined contribution pension plans		4		4		9		6		2

Total contributions	$	15	$	19	$	28	$	28	$	8

During the remainder of fiscal 2009, we expect to contribute an additional $24 million to our funded pension plans, $9 million to our unfunded pension plans and $8 million to our savings and defined contribution plans. For the six months ended September 30, 2008, actual returns for our worldwide funded pension plans were significantly below our expected rate of return of 6.9% due to adverse conditions in the equity markets. Continued actual returns below our expected rate may unfavorably impact the amount and timing of future contributions to funded plans.

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)


11.	Currency (Gains) Losses

The following currency (gains) losses are included in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations (in millions).


	Three Months						Six Months			May 16, 2007			April 1, 2007
	Ended						Ended			Through			Through
	September 30,						September 30,			September 30,			May 15,
	2008			2007			2008			2007			2007
				(Restated)						(Restated)
	Successor			Successor			Successor			Successor			Predecessor
Net (gain) loss on change in fair value of currency derivative instruments(A)	$	(7	)	$	(2	)	$	(39	)	$	(18	)	$	(10	)
Net (gain) loss on translation of monetary assets and liabilities(B)		36			8			56			15			4

	$	29		$	6		$	17		$	(3	)	$	(6	)


(A)		Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net.

(B)		Included in Other (income) expenses — net.

The following currency gains (losses) are included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets (net of tax effect and in millions).


	Six Months			May 16, 2007
	Ended			Through
	September 30, 2008			March 31, 2008
				(Restated)
	Successor			Successor

Cumulative currency translation adjustment — beginning of period	$	59		$	—
Effect of changes in exchange rates		(65	)		59

Cumulative currency translation adjustment — end of period	$	(6	)	$	59


12.	Financial Instruments and Commodity Contracts

In conducting our business, we use various derivative and non-derivative instruments to manage the risks arising from fluctuations in exchange rates, interest rates, aluminum prices and energy prices. Such instruments are used for risk management purposes only. We may be exposed to losses in the future if the counterparties to the contracts fail to perform. We are satisfied that the risk of such non-performance is remote, due to our monitoring of credit exposures. Our maximum potential loss may exceed the amount recognized in the accompanying September 30, 2008 condensed consolidated balance sheet.

The decision of whether and when to execute derivative instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary from period to period depending on market conditions, the relative costs of the instruments and capacity to hedge. The duration is always linked to the timing of the underlying exposure, with the connection between the two being regularly monitored.

The current and noncurrent portions of derivative assets are presented on the face of our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The current and noncurrent portions of derivative liabilities are included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities and Other long-term liabilities, respectively, in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity contracts as of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008 are as follows (in millions):


	As of September 30, 2008
	Assets				Liabilities						Net Fair Value
	Current		Noncurrent		Current			Noncurrent			Assets/(Liabilities)
Successor

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Cross-currency swaps	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	(65	)	$	(65	)
Interest rate swaps		—		—		—			(4	)		(4	)
Electricity swap		—		6		—			—			6

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments		—		6		—			(69	)		(63	)

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign exchange forward contracts		43		1		(50	)		(16	)		(22	)
Cross-currency swaps		12		—		(9	)		—			3
Interest rate currency swaps		—		23		—			—			23
Aluminum forward contracts		126		11		(297	)		(7	)		(167	)
Aluminum options		2		5		(22	)		(7	)		(22	)
Embedded derivative instruments		54		—		—			—			54
Natural gas swaps		—		—		(7	)		—			(7	)

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		237		40		(385	)		(30	)		(138	)

Total derivative fair value	$	237	$	46	$	(385	)	$	(99	)	$	(201	)

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)


	As of March 31, 2008
	Assets				Liabilities						Net Fair Value
	Current		Noncurrent		Current			Noncurrent			Assets/(Liabilities)
Successor

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Cross-currency swaps	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	(184	)	$	(184	)
Interest rate swaps		—		—		(3	)		(12	)		(15	)
Electricity swap		3		11		—			—			14

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments		3		11		(3	)		(196	)		(185	)

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign exchange forward contracts		43		4		(112	)		(4	)		(69	)
Cross-currency swaps		19		—		(4	)		(1	)		14
Interest rate currency swaps		2		2		—			—			4
Aluminum forward contracts		130		4		(9	)		—			125
Aluminum options		1		—		—			—			1
Embedded derivative instruments		—		—		(20	)		—			(20	)
Natural gas swaps		5		—		—			—			5

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		200		10		(145	)		(5	)		60

Total derivative fair value	$	203	$	21	$	(148	)	$	(201	)	$	(125	)

Net Investment Hedges

We use cross-currency swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuating exchange rates arising from our loans to and investments in our European operations. We have designated these as net investment hedges. The effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included in Other comprehensive income (loss). The ineffective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net.

The following table summarizes the amount of gain (loss) we recognized in Other comprehensive income (loss) related to our net investment hedge derivatives (in millions).

Three Months

Six Months

May 16, 2007

April 1, 2007

Ended

Through

September 30,

May 15,

2008

2007

2008

2007

Successor

Predecessor

Cross-currency swaps

(28

)

120

(28

)

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Cash Flow Hedges

We own an interest in an electricity swap which we have designated as a cash flow hedge against our exposure to fluctuating electricity prices. The effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included in Other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivatives — net in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

We use interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in the benchmark LIBOR interest rate arising from our variable rate debt. We have designated these as cash flow hedges. The effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included in Other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

For all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, gains or losses representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net in our current period earnings. If at any time during the life of a cash flow hedge relationship we determine that the relationship is no longer effective, the derivative will be de-designated as a cash flow hedge. This could occur if the underlying hedged exposure is determined to no longer be probable, or if our ongoing assessment of hedge effectiveness determines that the hedge relationship no longer meets the measures we have established at the inception of the hedge. Gains or losses recognized to date in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) would be immediately reclassified into current period earnings, as would any subsequent changes in the fair value of any such derivative.

During the next twelve months we expect to realize $1 million in effective net gains from our cash flow hedges. The maximum period over which we have hedged our exposure to cash flow variability is through 2017.

The following table summarizes the (1) the amount of gain or (loss) recognized in Other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI), (2) the amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from Accumulated OCI into income and (3) the amount of gain or (loss) recognized in income (ineffective portion) related to our cash flow hedge derivatives (in millions).

Three Month Comparison:

Amount of Gain or (Loss)

Recognized in Income on

Amount of Gain or (Loss)

Reclassified from Accumulated

Derivative (Ineffective Portion

Recognized in OCI on Derivative

OCI into Income

and Amount Excluded from

(Effective Portion)

Effectiveness Testing)

Three Months

Ended

September 30,

2008

2007

2008

2007

2008

2007

Successor

Electricity swap

(12

)

—

Interest rate swaps

—

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Six Month Comparison:

Amount of Gain or (Loss)

Recognized in Income

Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized

Amount of Gain or (Loss)

on Derivative

in OCI on Derivative

Reclassified from Accumulated

(Ineffective Portion and Amount

(Effective Portion)

OCI into Income (Effective Portion)

Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)

Six Months

Ended

September 30,

2008

Successor

Electricity swap

—

)

—

Interest rate swaps

—

Amount of Gain or (Loss)

Recognized in Income on Derivative

Recognized in OCI on

Reclassified from Accumulated

(Ineffective Portion and Amount

Derivative (Effective Portion)

OCI into Income (Effective Portion)

Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)

May 16, 2007

April 1, 2007

May 16, 2007

April 1, 2007

May 16, 2007

April 1, 2007

Through

September 30,

May 15,

September 30,

May 15,

September 30,

May 15,

2007

Successor

Predecessor

Successor

Predecessor

Successor

Predecessor

Foreign exchange forward contracts

—

)

—

Electricity swap

—

Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges

We use foreign exchange forward contracts and cross currency swaps to manage our exposure to changes in exchange rates. These exposures arise from recorded assets and liabilities, firm commitments and forecasted cash flows denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of certain of our operations.

We use aluminum forward contracts and options to hedge our exposure to changes in the London Metal Exchange (LME) price of aluminum. These exposures arise from firm commitments to sell aluminum in future periods at fixed or capped prices, the forecasted output of our smelter operations in South America, and the forecasted metal price lag associated with firm commitments to sell aluminum in future periods at prices based on the LME.

We have an embedded derivative which arises from a contractual relationship with a customer that entitles us to pass-through the economic effect of trading positions that we take with other third parties on their behalf.

We use natural gas swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuating energy prices in North America.

While each of these derivatives is intended to be effective in helping us manage risk, they have not been designated as hedging instruments under FASB Statement No. 133. The change in fair value of these derivatives is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

The following table summarizes the gains (losses) recognized in current period earnings (in millions).


	Three Months						Six Months			May 16, 2007			April 1, 2007
	Ended						Ended			Through			Through
	September 30,						September 30,			September 30,			May 15,
	2008			2007			2008			2007			2007
	Successor			Successor			Successor			Successor			Predecessor
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
Foreign exchange forward contracts	$	17		$	(4	)	$	7		$	12		$	11
Interest rate currency swaps		15			(2	)		24			(2	)		(1	)
Aluminum forward contracts		(207	)		(30	)		(191	)		(34	)		9
Aluminum options		(27	)		—			(25	)		1			—
Embedded derivative instruments		53			15			58			12			2
Natural gas swaps		(16	)		(2	)		(9	)		(3	)		1
Cross currency swaps		(25	)		(9	)		8			(6	)		(3	)

Gain (loss) recognized		(190	)		(32	)		(128	)		(20	)		19
Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
Electricity swap		5			2			9			4			1

Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net	$	(185	)	$	(30	)	$	(119	)	$	(16	)	$	20


13.	Fair Value Measurements

FASB Statement No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited exceptions. Our adoption of FASB Statement No. 157 on April 1, 2008 resulted in (1) a gain of less than $1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, which is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net in our condensed consolidated statement of operations, (2) a $1 million decrease to the fair value of effective portion of hedges — net included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and (3) a $35 million increase to the foreign currency translation adjustment included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) during the quarter ended June 30, 2008. These adjustments are primarily due to the inclusion of nonperformance risk (i.e., credit spreads) in our valuation models related to certain of our cross-currency swap derivative instruments (see Note 12 — Financial Instruments and Commodity Contracts).

FASB Statement No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FASB Statement No. 157 will be the single source in GAAP for the definition of fair value, except for the fair value of leased property as defined in FASB Statement No. 13, for purposes of lease classification or measurement. FASB Statement No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under FASB Statement No. 157 are described as follows:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3 — Inputs that are unobservable for the asset or liability.

The following section describes the valuation methodologies we used to measure our various financial instruments at fair value, including an indication of the level in the fair value hierarchy in which each instrument is generally classified:

Derivative contracts

For certain of our derivative contracts whose fair values are based upon trades in liquid markets, such as aluminum forward contracts and options, valuation model inputs can generally be verified and valuation techniques do not involve significant judgment. The fair values of such financial instruments are generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The majority of our derivative contracts are valued using industry-standard models that use observable market inputs as their basis, such as time value, forward interest rates, volatility factors, and current (spot) and forward market prices for foreign exchange rates. We generally classify these instruments within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Such derivatives include interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps, foreign currency forward contracts and certain energy-related forward contracts (e.g., natural gas).

We classify derivative contracts that are valued based on models with significant unobservable market inputs as Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. These derivatives include certain of our energy-related forward contracts (e.g., electricity) and certain foreign currency forward contracts. Models for these fair value measurements include inputs based on estimated future prices for periods beyond the term of the quoted prices.

FASB Statement No. 157 requires that for Level 2 and 3 of the fair value hierarchy, where appropriate, valuations are adjusted for various factors such as liquidity, bid/offer spreads and credit considerations (nonperformance risk).

The following table presents our assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis classified under the appropriate level of the fair value hierarchy as of September 30, 2008 (in millions).


	Fair Value Measurements Using
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3			Total
Successor:

Assets — Derivative instruments	$	—	$	277		$	6		$	283
Liabilities — Derivative instruments	$	—	$	(468	)	$	(16	)	$	(484	)

Financial instruments classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy represent derivative contracts (primarily energy-related and certain foreign currency forward contracts) in which at least one significant unobservable input is used in the valuation model. We incurred $22 million of unrealized losses related to Level 3 financial instruments that were still held as of September 30, 2008. These unrealized losses are

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net. The following table presents a reconciliation of activity for Level 3 derivative contracts on a net basis (in millions).

Net Realized/

Unrealized

Gains (Losses)

Beginning

Gains

Included

Ending

Balance

(Losses)

in Other

Net Purchases,

Net Transfers

Balance

April 1,

Included in

Comprehensive

Issuances and

in and/or

September 30,

2008

Earnings(B)

Income (Loss)(C)

Settlements

(out) of Level 3

2008

Successor:

Derivative instruments(A)

)

(10

)


(A)		Represents derivative assets net of derivative liabilities.

(B)		Included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net.

(C)		Included in Change in fair value of effective portion of hedges — net.


14.	Other (Income) Expenses — Net

Other (income) expenses — net is comprised of the following (in millions).


	Three Months						Six Months			May 16, 2007			April 1, 2007
	Ended						Ended			Through			Through
	September 30,						September 30,			September 30,			May 15,
	2008			2007			2008			2007			2007
				(Restated)						(Restated)
	Successor			Successor			Successor			Successor			Predecessor
Exchange (gains) losses — net	$	36		$	8		$	56		$	15		$	4
(Gain) loss on reversal of accrued legal claim(A)		(26	)		—			(26	)		—			—
(Gain) loss on partial reversal of accrued social contribution tax		—			(14	)		—			(14	)		—
Restructuring charges (recoveries) — net		—			—			(1	)		1			1
Impairment charges on long-lived assets		—			—			1			—			—
(Gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment — net		(1	)		—			(2	)		—			—
Other — net		1			4			4			7			(1	)

Other (income) expenses — net	$	10		$	(2	)	$	32		$	9		$	4


(A)		See Note 16 — Commitments and Contingencies for a discussion regarding the settlement of the Reynolds Boat Case.


15.	Income Taxes

The Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) for the three and six months ended September 30, 2008 was based on the estimated effective tax rates applicable for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2009, after considering items specifically related to the interim period. The Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) for the periods from May 16, 2007 through September 30, 2007 (as restated) and April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007 were based on the estimated effective tax rates applicable for the year ended March 31, 2008, after considering items specifically related to the interim periods.

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

A reconciliation of the Canadian statutory tax rates to our effective tax rates is as follows (in millions, except percentages).


	Three Months						Six Months			May 16, 2007			April 1, 2007
	Ended						Ended			Through			Through
	September 30,						September 30,			September 30,			May 15,
	2008			2007			2008			2007			2007
				(Restated)						(Restated)
	Successor			Successor			Successor			Successor			Predecessor
Pre-tax income (loss) before equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests’ share	$	(274	)	$	(19	)	$	(210	)	$	(38	)	$	(95	)

Canadian statutory tax rate		31	%		33	%		31	%		33	%		33	%

Provision (benefit) at the Canadian statutory rate		(85	)		(6	)		(65	)		(13	)		(31	)
Increase (decrease) for taxes on income (loss) resulting from:
Exchange translation items		(22	)		30			(13	)		49			23
Exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes		(41	)		4			(21	)		7			3
Change in valuation allowances		15			19			18			41			13
Expense (income) items not subject to tax		10			(5	)		6			(19	)		(9	)
Enacted statutory tax rate changes		2			(25	)		2			(25	)		—
Tax rate differences on foreign earnings		(54	)		(2	)		(68	)		—			2
Uncertain tax positions		—			—			1			—			—
Other — net		6			5			6			7			3

Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)	$	(169	)	$	20		$	(134	)	$	47		$	4

Effective tax rate		62	%		(105	)%		64	%		(124	)%		(4	)%

Our effective tax rate differs from the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the following factors: (1) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax effect and the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect, which is shown above as exchange translation items; (2) the remeasurement of deferred income taxes due to foreign currency changes, which is shown above as exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes; (3) changes in valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize those losses; and (4) differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign effective tax rates applied to entities in different jurisdictions shown above as tax rate differences on foreign earnings.

Tax Uncertainties

Adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes, by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, our unrecognized tax benefits decreased $7 million as a result of tax positions taken during a prior period and settlements with taxing authorities. Our reserves for uncertain tax positions totaled $54 million and $61 million as of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, respectively. As of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective income tax rate in future periods based on anticipated settlement dates was $46 million and $47 million, respectively.

Tax authorities are currently examining certain of our prior years’ tax returns for 2004-2006. We are evaluating potential adjustments related to these examinations and do not anticipate that settlement of the examinations will result in a material payment.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, taxing authorities in Germany concluded their audit of the tax years 1999-2003. As a result of this settlement, we reduced our unrecognized tax benefits by $10 million including cash payments to taxing authorities of $6 million and a reduction to Goodwill of $4 million.

Separately, we are awaiting a court ruling regarding the utilization of certain operating losses. We anticipate that it is reasonably possible that this ruling will result in a $12 million decrease in unrecognized tax benefits by March 31, 2009 related to this matter. We have fully funded this contingent liability through a judicial deposit, which is included in Other long-term assets — third parties since January 2007.

With the exception of the ongoing tax examinations described above, we are not currently under examination by any income tax authorities for years before 2004. With few exceptions, our tax returns for all tax years before 2001 are no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities.

Our continuing practice and policy is to record potential interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in our Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss). As of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, we had $12 million and $14 million (as restated) accrued for potential interest on income taxes, respectively. For the three and six months ended September 30, 2008, our Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) included an additional charge of $1 and $2 million of potential interest, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2007 and the periods from May 16, 2007 through September 30, 2007 and from April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, our Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) included charges for an additional $1 million, $3 million and $1 million of potential interest, respectively.


16.	Commitments and Contingencies

Primary Supplier

Alcan is our primary supplier of metal inputs, including prime and sheet ingot. The table below shows our purchases from Alcan as a percentage of our total combined metal purchases.

Three Months

Six Months

May 16, 2007

April 1, 2007

Ended

Through

September 30,

May 15,

2008

2007

2008

2007

Successor

Predecessor

Purchases from Alcan as a percentage of total metal purchases in kt(A)


(A)		One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric tonnes. One metric tonne is equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds.

Legal Proceedings

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

0175RJB. Plaintiffs were Reynolds Metals Company, Alcoa, Inc. and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA. The case was tried before a jury beginning on May 1, 2006 under implied warranty theories, based on allegations that from 1998 to 2001 we and Alcan sold certain aluminum products that were ultimately used for marine applications and were unsuitable for such applications. The jury reached a verdict on May 22, 2006 against us and Alcan for approximately $60 million, and the court later awarded Reynolds and Alcoa approximately $16 million in prejudgment interest and court costs.

The case was settled during July 2006 as among us, Alcan, Reynolds, Alcoa and their insurers for $71 million. We contributed approximately $1 million toward the settlement, and the remaining $70 million was funded by our insurers. Although the settlement was substantially funded by our insurance carriers, certain of them have reserved the right to request a refund from us, after reviewing details of the plaintiffs’ damages to determine if they include costs of a nature not covered under the insurance contracts. Of the $70 million funded, $39 million was in dispute with and under further review by certain of our insurance carriers. In the quarter ended September 30, 2006, we posted a letter of credit in the amount of approximately $10 million in favor of one of those insurance carriers, while we sought to resolve the extent of coverage of the costs included in the settlement. On October 8, 2007, we received a letter from these insurers stating that they had completed their review and they were requesting a refund of the $39 million plus interest. We reviewed the insurers’ position, and on January 7, 2008, we sent a letter to the insurers rejecting their position that Novelis is not entitled to insurance coverage for the judgment against Novelis.

Since our fiscal 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K was not filed until August 25, 2006, we recognized a liability for the full settlement amount of $71 million on December 31, 2005, included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet, with a corresponding charge against earnings. We also recognized an insurance receivable included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets on our consolidated balance sheet of $31 million, with a corresponding increase to earnings. Although $70 million of the settlement was funded by our insurers, we only recognized an insurance receivable to the extent that coverage was not in dispute. This resulted in a net charge of $40 million during the quarter ended December 31, 2005.

In July 2006, we contributed and paid $1 million to our insurers who subsequently paid the entire settlement amount of $71 million to the plaintiffs. Accordingly, during the quarter ended September 30, 2006, we reversed the previously recorded insurance receivable of $31 million and reduced our recorded liability by the same amount plus the $1 million contributed by us. The remaining liability of $39 million at September 30, 2006 represented the amount of the settlement claim that was funded by our insurers but was still in dispute with and under review by the parties as described above. The $39 million liability was included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheet for all periods through and as of June 30, 2008.

On September 4, 2008, Novelis, our insurers, and Alcan entered into a settlement agreement to resolve the insurance coverage dispute related to the Reynolds boat case. Pursuant to that settlement agreement, we paid approximately $13 million to our insurers on September 8, 2008 and recognized a non-cash pre-tax gain of $26 million included in Other (income) expenses — net upon the reversal of our previously recorded $39 million liability. Our insurers returned our letter of credit that had been on deposit pending the outcome of settlement discussions. This concludes the Reynolds Boat Case insurance coverage matter.

Coca-Cola Lawsuits. A lawsuit was commenced against Novelis Corporation on February 15, 2007 by Coca-Cola Bottler’s Sales and Services Company LLC (CCBSS) in state court in Georgia. In addition, a lawsuit was commenced against Novelis Corporation and Alcan Corporation on April 3, 2007 by Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc., Enterprises Acquisition Company, Inc., The Coca-Cola Company and The Coca-Cola Trading Company, Inc. (collectively CCE) in federal court in Georgia. Novelis intends to defend these claims vigorously.

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

CCBSS is a consortium of Coca-Cola bottlers across the United States, including Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached an aluminum can stock supply agreement between the parties, and seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial and a declaration of its rights under the agreement. The agreement includes a “most favored nations” provision regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached the terms of the “most favored nations” provision. The dispute will likely turn on the facts that are presented to the court by the parties and the court’s finding as to how certain provisions of the agreement ought to be interpreted. If CCBSS were to prevail in this litigation, the amount of damages would likely be material. Novelis Corporation has filed its answer and the parties are proceeding with discovery.

The claim by CCE seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial for breach of a prior aluminum can stock supply agreement between CCE and Novelis Corporation, successor to the rights and obligations of Alcan Aluminum Corporation under the agreement. According to its terms, that agreement with CCE terminated in 2006. The CCE supply agreement included a “most favored nations” provision regarding certain pricing matters. CCE alleges that Novelis Corporation’s entry into a supply agreement with Anheuser-Busch, Inc. breached the “most favored nations” provision of the CCE supply agreement. Novelis Corporation moved to dismiss the complaint and on March 26, 2008, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia issued an order granting Novelis Corporation’s motion to dismiss CCE’s claim. On April 24, 2008, CCE filed a notice of appeal of the court’s order with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and filed its appellate brief on July 11, 2008. On August 13, 2008, Novelis Corporation filed its response brief with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. CCE filed its response on September 5, 2008.

On October 24, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the decision of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia to dismiss CCE’s lawsuit against Novelis Corporation for breach of the “most favored nations” clause.

Anheuser-Busch Litigation. On September 19, 2006, Novelis Corporation filed a lawsuit against Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (Anheuser-Busch) in federal court in Ohio. Anheuser-Busch subsequently filed suit against Novelis Corporation and the Company in federal court in Missouri. On January 3, 2007, Anheuser-Busch’s suit was transferred to the Ohio federal court.

Novelis Corporation alleged that Anheuser-Busch breached the existing multi-year aluminum can stock supply agreement between the parties, and sought monetary damages and declaratory relief. Among other claims, we asserted that since entering into the supply agreement, Anheuser-Busch has breached its confidentiality obligations and there has been a structural change in market conditions that requires a change to the pricing provisions under the agreement.

In its complaint, Anheuser-Busch asked for a declaratory judgment that Anheuser-Busch is not obligated to modify the supply agreement as requested by Novelis Corporation, and that Novelis Corporation must continue to perform under the existing supply agreement.

On January 18, 2008, Anheuser-Busch filed a motion for summary judgment. On May 22, 2008, the court granted Anheuser-Busch’s motion for summary judgment. Novelis Corporation filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on June 20, 2008.

On August 18, 2008, Novelis and Anheuser-Busch entered into an agreement to terminate the litigation between the parties. Pursuant to the litigation termination agreement, Anheuser-Busch agreed to drop its claims against Novelis in consideration for the withdrawal of our appeal. The parties then filed a Notice of Withdrawal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on August 19, 2008. This concludes the Anheuser-Busch litigation matter.

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

ARCO Aluminum Complaint. On May 24, 2007, Arco Aluminum Inc. (ARCO) filed a complaint against Novelis Corporation and Novelis Inc. in the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. ARCO and Novelis are partners in a joint venture rolling mill located in Logan, Kentucky. In the complaint, ARCO seeks to resolve a perceived dispute over management and control of the joint venture following Hindalco’s acquisition of Novelis.

ARCO alleges that its consent was required in connection with Hindalco’s acquisition of Novelis. Failure to obtain consent, ARCO alleges, has put us in default of the joint venture agreements, thereby triggering certain provisions in those agreements. The provisions include a reversion of the production management at the joint venture to Logan Aluminum from Novelis, and a reduction of the board of directors of the entity that manages the joint venture from seven members (four appointed by Novelis and three appointed by ARCO) to six members (three appointed by each of Novelis and ARCO).

ARCO seeks a court declaration that (1) Novelis and its affiliates are prohibited from exercising any managerial authority or control over the joint venture, (2) Novelis’ interest in the joint venture is limited to an economic interest only and (3) ARCO has authority to act on behalf of the joint venture. Or, alternatively, ARCO is seeking a reversion of the production management function to Logan Aluminum, and a change in the composition of the board of directors of the entity that manages the joint venture. Novelis filed its answer to the complaint on July 16, 2007.

On July 3, 2007, ARCO filed a motion for partial summary judgment with respect to one of the counts of its complaint relating to the claim that Novelis breached the joint venture agreement by not seeking ARCO’s consent. On July 30, 2007, Novelis filed a motion to hold ARCO’s motion for summary judgment in abeyance (pending further discovery), along with a demand for a jury. On February 14, 2008, the judge issued an order granting our motion to hold ARCO’s summary judgment motion in abeyance. Pursuant to this ruling, management and the board of the joint venture are conducting their activities as normal.

Environmental Matters

The following describes certain environmental matters relating to our business. None of the environmental matters include government sanctions of $100,000 or more.

We are involved in proceedings under the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, also known as CERCLA or Superfund, or analogous state provisions regarding liability arising from the usage, storage, treatment or disposal of hazardous substances and wastes at a number of sites in the United States, as well as similar proceedings under the laws and regulations of the other jurisdictions in which we have operations, including Brazil and certain countries in the European Union. Many of these jurisdictions have laws that impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, for the costs of environmental remediation, natural resource damages, third party claims, and other expenses, on those persons who contributed to the release of a hazardous substance into the environment. In addition, we are, from time to time, subject to environmental reviews and investigations by relevant governmental authorities.

As described further in the following paragraph, we have established procedures for regularly evaluating environmental loss contingencies, including those arising from such environmental reviews and investigations and any other environmental remediation or compliance matters. We believe we have a reasonable basis for evaluating these environmental loss contingencies, and we believe we have made reasonable estimates of the costs that are likely to be borne by us for these environmental loss contingencies. Accordingly, we have established reserves based on our reasonable estimates for the currently anticipated costs associated with these environmental matters. We estimate that the undiscounted remaining clean-up costs related to all of our known environmental matters as of September 30, 2008 will be approximately $43 million. Of this amount,

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

$33 million is included in Other long-term liabilities, with the remaining $10 million included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2008. Management has reviewed the environmental matters, including those for which we assumed liability as a result of our spin-off from Alcan. As a result of this review, management has determined that the currently anticipated costs associated with these environmental matters will not, individually or in the aggregate, materially impair our operations or materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

With respect to environmental loss contingencies, we record a loss contingency on a non-discounted basis whenever such contingency is probable and reasonably estimable. The evaluation model includes all asserted and unasserted claims that can be reasonably identified. Under this evaluation model, the liability and the related costs are quantified based upon the best available evidence regarding actual liability loss and cost estimates. Except for those loss contingencies where no estimate can reasonably be made, the evaluation model is fact-driven and attempts to estimate the full costs of each claim. Management reviews the status of, and estimated liability related to, pending claims and civil actions on a quarterly basis. The estimated costs in respect of such reported liabilities are not offset by amounts related to cost-sharing between parties, insurance, indemnification arrangements or contribution from other potentially responsible parties (PRPs) unless otherwise noted.

Butler Tunnel Site. Novelis Corporation was a party in a 1989 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) lawsuit before the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania involving the Butler Tunnel Superfund site, a third-party disposal site. In May 1991, the Court granted summary judgment against Novelis Corporation for alleged disposal of hazardous waste. After unsuccessful appeals, Novelis Corporation paid the entire judgment plus interest.

The EPA filed a second cost recovery action against Novelis Corporation seeking recovery of expenses associated with the installation of an early warning and response system for potential future releases from the Butler Tunnel site. In January 2008, Novelis Corporation and the Department of Justice, on behalf of the EPA, entered into a consent decree whereby Novelis Corporation agreed to pay $1.9 million in three installments in settlement of its liability with the U.S. government.

Prior to the execution of the Novelis Corporation consent decree, the EPA entered into consent decrees with the other Butler Tunnel PRPs to finance and construct the early warning and response system. On October 30, 2008, the trustee for the PRPs provided a detailed analysis of the past and future costs associated with the implementation of the early warning system and advised us of their intention to file a contribution action against us. Given the success of these types of civil claims in environmental cases and our prior adverse court rulings, we have recognized a liability for $3.8 million reflecting our portion of the previous and remaining costs to complete the early warning and response system.

Brazil Tax Matters

Primarily as a result of legal proceedings with Brazil’s Ministry of Treasury regarding certain taxes in South America, as of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, we had cash deposits aggregating approximately $33 million and $36 million, respectively, in judicial depository accounts pending finalization of the related cases. The depository accounts are in the name of the Brazilian government and will be expended towards these legal proceedings or released to us, depending on the outcome of the legal cases. These deposits are included in Other long-term assets — third parties in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. In addition, we are involved in several disputes with Brazil’s Minister of Treasury about various forms of manufacturing taxes and social security contributions, for which we have made no judicial deposits but for which we have established reserves ranging from $7 million to $94 million as of September 30, 2008. In total, these reserves approximate $113 million and $111 million as of September 30,

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

2008 and March 31, 2008, respectively, and are included in Other long-term liabilities in our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

On July 16, 2008, the second instance court in Brazil ruled in favor of the Ministry of Treasury in the amount of $5.5 million in one of these tax disputes. On August 11, 2008, we requested a clarification of the court’s order to better understand the reasoning behind the decision and prepare our appeal. The request for clarification suspends the deadline for appeal, which usually must be filed within 30 days of receiving the order. While we are fully reserved for these disputed credits, we must make a judicial deposit of $5.5 million at the time we file the appeal.

Guarantees of Indebtedness

We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including:


	•	certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and

	•	Aluminium Norf GmbH, which is a fifty percent (50%) owned joint venture that does not meet the requirements for consolidation under FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.

In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. Some of the guarantees have annual terms while others have no expiration and have termination notice requirements. Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries or non-consolidated affiliates holds any assets of any third parties as collateral to offset the potential settlement of these guarantees.

Since we consolidate wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries in our condensed consolidated financial statements, all liabilities associated with trade payables and short-term debt facilities for these entities are already included in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The following table discloses information about our obligations under guarantees of indebtedness of others as of September 30, 2008 (in millions). We did not have any obligations under guarantees of indebtedness related to our majority-owned subsidiaries as of September 30, 2008.


	Maximum		Liability
	Potential		Carrying
Type of Entity	Future Payment		Value

Wholly-owned subsidiaries	$	89	$	63
Aluminium Norf GmbH	$	14	$	—

We have no retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that entity for such assets.


17.	Segment and Major Customer Information

Segment Information

Due in part to the regional nature of supply and demand of aluminum rolled products and in order to best serve our customers, we manage our activities on the basis of geographical areas and are organized under four operating segments: North America, Europe, Asia and South America.

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

The following is a description of our operating segments:


	•	North America. Headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge products and operates 11 plants, including two fully dedicated recycling facilities, in two countries.

	•	Europe. Headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland, this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge products and operates 14 plants, including one recycling facility, in six countries.

	•	Asia. Headquartered in Seoul, South Korea, this segment manufactures aluminum sheet and light gauge products and operates three plants in two countries.

	•	South America. Headquartered in Sao Paulo, Brazil, this segment comprises bauxite mining, alumina refining, smelting operations, power generation, carbon products, aluminum sheet and light gauge products and operates four plants in Brazil.

Adjustment to Eliminate Proportional Consolidation. The financial information for our segments includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent with the way we manage our business segments. However, under GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to reconcile the financial information for the segments shown in the tables below to the relevant GAAP-based measures, we must remove our proportional share of each line item that we included in the segment amounts. See Note 6 — Investment in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions for further information about these non-consolidated affiliates.

The tables below show selected segment financial information (in millions). The Corporate and Other column in the tables below includes functions that are managed directly from our corporate office, which focuses on strategy development and oversees governance, policy, legal compliance, human resources and finance matters. It also includes consolidating and other elimination accounts.

Selected Segment Financial Information


									Adjustment to
									Eliminate
	North						South		Proportional			Corporate
Total Assets	America		Europe		Asia		America		Consolidation			and Other		Total
(Successor)

September 30, 2008	$	4,003	$	3,775	$	985	$	1,486	$	(191	)	$	266	$	10,324
March 31, 2008 (Restated)	$	3,888	$	4,171	$	1,081	$	1,478	$	(199	)	$	263	$	10,682

Comparison of Three Month Data:


										Adjustment to
										Eliminate
Selected Operating Results	North							South		Proportional			Corporate
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008	America		Europe		Asia			America		Consolidation			and Other			Total
(Successor)

Net sales (to third parties)	$	1,111	$	1,097	$	458		$	300	$	(7	)	$	—		$	2,959
Intersegment sales		2		4		—			—		—			(6	)		—
Segment Income		2		62		(3	)		48		—			—			109
Depreciation and amortization		41		54		13			19		(20	)		—			107
Capital expenditures		10		17		6			9		(6	)		1			37

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)


									Adjustment to
									Eliminate
Selected Operating Results	North						South		Proportional			Corporate
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007	America		Europe		Asia		America		Consolidation			and Other			Total
(Successor)

Net sales (to third parties)	$	1,050	$	1,092	$	438	$	241	$	—		$	—		$	2,821
Intersegment sales		2		1		4		11		—			(18	)		—
Segment Income (Restated)		89		68		18		46		—			—			221
Depreciation and amortization (Restated)		40		47		16		15		(15	)		—			103
Capital expenditures		8		16		6		7		(3	)		1			35

Comparison of Six Month Data:


									Adjustment to
									Eliminate
Selected Operating Results	North						South		Proportional			Corporate
Six Months Ended September 30, 2008	America		Europe		Asia		America		Consolidation			and Other			Total
(Successor)

Net sales (to third parties)	$	2,194	$	2,315	$	968	$	595	$	(10	)	$	—		$	6,062
Intersegment sales		2		5		1		—		—			(8	)		—
Segment Income		44		173		28		95		—			—			340
Depreciation and amortization		83		117		28		36		(42	)		1			223
Capital expenditures		17		36		11		15		(10	)		1			70


									Adjustment to
									Eliminate
Selected Operating Results	North						South		Proportional			Corporate
May 16, 2007 Through September 30, 2007	America		Europe		Asia		America		Consolidation			and Other			Total
(Successor)

Net sales (to third parties)	$	1,624	$	1,686	$	683	$	375	$	—		$	—		$	4,368
Intersegment sales		3		1		6		27		—			(37	)		—
Segment Income (Restated)		112		111		16		68		—			—			307
Depreciation and amortization (Restated)		61		72		24		22		(23	)		—			156
Capital expenditures		14		25		11		8		(3	)		2			57


										Adjustment to
										Eliminate
Selected Operating Results	North							South		Proportional			Corporate
April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007	America			Europe		Asia		America		Consolidation			and Other			Total
(Predecessor)

Net sales (to third parties)	$	446		$	510	$	216	$	109	$	—		$	—		$	1,281
Intersegment sales		—			—		1		7		—			(8	)		—
Segment Income		(24	)		32		6		18		—			—			32
Depreciation and amortization		7			11		7		5		(3	)		1			28
Capital expenditures		4			8		4		3		(3	)		1			17

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

The following table shows the reconciliation from Total Segment Income to Net income (loss) (in millions).


	Three Months						Six Months			May 16, 2007			April 1, 2007
	Ended						Ended			Through			Through
	September 30,						September 30,			September 30,			May 15,
	2008			2007			2008			2007			2007
				(Restated)						(Restated)
	Successor			Predecessor			Successor			Successor			Predecessor
Total Segment Income	$	109		$	221		$	340		$	307		$	32
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net		(41	)		(56	)		(81	)		(81	)		(26	)
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net(A)		(221	)		(87	)		(200	)		(102	)		5
Realized gains (losses) on corporate derivative instruments — net		—			30			—			38			(3	)
Depreciation and amortization		(107	)		(103	)		(223	)		(156	)		(28	)
Impairment charges on long-lived assets		—			—			(1	)		—			—
Minority interests’ share		—			—			(2	)		2			1
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation(B)		(18	)		7			(36	)		(2	)		(7	)
Restructuring recoveries (charges) — net		—			—			1			(1	)		(1	)
Gain (loss) on sales of property, plant and equipment and businesses — net		1			—			2			—			—
Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses		(16	)		(16	)		(30	)		(24	)		(35	)
Other costs — net(C)		21			5			18			2			1
Sale transaction fees		—			—			—			—			(32	)
Benefit (provision) for taxes on income (loss)		169			(20	)		134			(47	)		(4	)

Net income (loss)	$	(103	)	$	(19	)	$	(78	)	$	(64	)	$	(97	)


(A)		Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net represents the portion of gains (losses) that were not settled in cash during the period. Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) are shown in the table below and are included in the aggregate each period in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net on our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)


	Three Months						Six Months			May 16, 2007			April 1, 2007
	Ended						Ended			Through			Through
	September 30,						September 30,			September 30,			May 15,
	2008			2007			2008			2007			2007
				(Restated)						(Restated)
	Successor			Successor			Successor			Successor			Predecessor
(Gains) losses on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net:
Realized and included in Segment Income	$	(36	)	$	(27	)	$	(81	)	$	(48	)	$	(18	)
Realized on corporate derivative instruments		—			(30	)		—			(38	)		3
Unrealized		221			87			200			102			(5	)

(Gains) losses on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net	$	185		$	30		$	119		$	16		$	(20	)


(B)		Our financial information for our segments (including Segment Income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent with the way we manage our business segments. However, under GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to reconcile Total Segment Income to Net income (loss), the proportional Segment Income of these non-consolidated affiliates is removed from Total Segment Income, net of our share of their net after-tax results, which is reported as Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates on our condensed consolidated statements of operations. See Note 6 — Investment in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions for further information about these non-consolidated affiliates.

(C)		Other costs — net includes a $26 million gain on the reversal of a legal accrual for the Reynolds Boat Case during the three and six months ended September 30, 2008. See Note 16 — Commitments and Contingencies for additional discussion.

Information about Major Customers

All of our operating segments had Net sales to Rexam Plc (Rexam), our largest customer. The table below shows our net sales to Rexam as a percentage of total Net sales.


	Three Months		Six Months	May 16, 2007	April 1, 2007
	Ended		Ended	Through	Through
	September 30,		September 30,	September 30,	May 15,
	2008	2007	2007	2007	2007
	Successor	Successor	Successor	Successor	Predecessor
Net sales to Rexam as a percentage of total net sales	16.9%	15.6%	16.2%	14.7%	13.5%


18.	Supplemental Guarantor Information

In connection with the issuance of our Senior Notes, certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries provided guarantees of the Senior Notes. These guarantees are full and unconditional as well as joint and several. The guarantor subsidiaries (the Guarantors) are comprised of the majority of our businesses in Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Brazil and Switzerland, as well as certain businesses in Germany. Certain Guarantors may be subject to restrictions on their ability to distribute earnings to Novelis Inc. (the Parent). The remaining subsidiaries (the Non-Guarantors) of the Parent are not guarantors of the Senior Notes.

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

The following information presents condensed consolidating statements of operations, balance sheets and statements of cash flows of the Parent, the Guarantors, and the Non-Guarantors. Investments include investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates as well as investments in net assets of divisions included in the Parent, and have been presented using the equity method of accounting.

Novelis Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

(In millions)


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 (Successor)
							Non-
	Parent			Guarantors			Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated

Net sales	$	389		$	2,482		$	767		$	(679	)	$	2,959

Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)		384			2,364			722			(679	)		2,791
Selling, general and administrative expenses		6			62			21			—			89
Depreciation and amortization		6			77			24			—			107
Research and development expenses		7			3			—			—			10
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net		7			31			3			—			41
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net		3			197			(15	)		—			185
Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates		81			(2	)		—			(81	)		(2	)
Other (income) expenses — net		(3	)		(22	)		35			—			10

		491			2,710			790			(760	)		3,231

Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) and minority interests’ share		(102	)		(228	)		(23	)		81			(272	)
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)		1			(165	)		(5	)		—			(169	)

Income (loss) before minority interests’ share		(103	)		(63	)		(18	)		81			(103	)
Minority interests’ share		—			—			—			—			—

Net income (loss)	$	(103	)	$	(63	)	$	(18	)	$	81		$	(103	)

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Novelis Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

(In millions)


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 (Successor)
							Non-
Restated	Parent			Guarantors			Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated

Net sales	$	369		$	2,340		$	736		$	(624	)	$	2,821

Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)		365			2,117			697			(624	)		2,555
Selling, general and administrative expenses		8			62			18			—			88
Depreciation and amortization		5			75			23			—			103
Research and development expenses		7			2			1			—			10
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net		15			35			6			—			56
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net		1			21			8			—			30
Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates		(9	)		(20	)		—			9			(20	)
Other (income) expenses — net		(8	)		7			(1	)		—			(2	)

		384			2,299			752			(615	)		2,820

Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) and minority interests’ share		(15	)		41			(16	)		(9	)		1
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)		4			15			1			—			20

Income (loss) before minority interests’ share		(19	)		26			(17	)		(9	)		(19	)
Minority interests’ share		—			—			—			—			—

Net income (loss)	$	(19	)	$	26		$	(17	)	$	(9	)	$	(19	)

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Novelis Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

(In millions)


	Six Months Ended September 30, 2008 (Successor)
							Non-
	Parent			Guarantors			Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated

Net sales	$	784		$	5,064		$	1,603		$	(1,389	)	$	6,062

Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)		771			4,741			1,499			(1,389	)		5,622
Selling, general and administrative expenses		6			124			43			—			173
Depreciation and amortization		12			166			45			—			223
Research and development expenses		15			6			1			—			22
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net		14			60			7			—			81
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net		3			135			(19	)		—			119
Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates		49			—			—			(49	)		—
Other (income) expenses — net		(10	)		(9	)		51			—			32

		860			5,223			1,627			(1,438	)		6,272

Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) and minority interests’ share		(76	)		(159	)		(24	)		49			(210	)
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)		2			(132	)		(4	)		—			(134	)

Income (loss) before minority interests’ share		(78	)		(27	)		(20	)		49			(76	)
Minority interests’ share		—			—			(2	)		—			(2	)

Net income (loss)	$	(78	)	$	(27	)	$	(22	)	$	49		$	(78	)

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Novelis Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

(In millions)


	May 16, 2007 Through September 30, 2007 (Successor)
							Non-
Restated	Parent			Guarantors			Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated

Net sales	$	614		$	3,687		$	1,155		$	(1,088	)	$	4,368

Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)		612			3,368			1,099			(1,088	)		3,991
Selling, general and administrative expenses		13			87			30			—			130
Depreciation and amortization		8			113			35			—			156
Research and development expenses		9			9			5			—			23
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net		18			55			8			—			81
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net		(12	)		17			11			—			16
Equity in net (income) loss of affiliates		16			(19	)		—			(16	)		(19	)
Other (income) expenses — net		(12	)		21			—			—			9

		652			3,651			1,188			(1,104	)		4,387

Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) and minority interests’ share		(38	)		36			(33	)		16			(19	)
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)		26			20			1			—			47

Income (loss) before minority interests’ share		(64	)		16			(34	)		16			(66	)
Minority interests’ share		—			—			2			—			2

Net income (loss)	$	(64	)	$	16		$	(32	)	$	16		$	(64	)

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Novelis Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

(In millions)


	April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007 (Predecessor)
							Non-
	Parent			Guarantors			Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated

Net sales	$	129		$	1,020		$	359		$	(227	)	$	1,281

Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)		131			961			340			(227	)		1,205
Selling, general and administrative expenses		29			51			15			—			95
Depreciation and amortization		2			18			8			—			28
Research and development expenses		5			1			—			—			6
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net		3			20			3			—			26
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net		(2	)		(19	)		1			—			(20	)
Equity in net (income) loss of non-affiliates		29			(1	)		—			(29	)		(1	)
Sale transaction fees		32			—			—			—			32
Other (income) expenses — net		(3	)		9			(2	)		—			4

		226			1,040			365			(256	)		1,375

Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) and minority interests’ share		(97	)		(20	)		(6	)		29			(94	)
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)		—			3			1			—			4

Income (loss) before minority interests’ share		(97	)		(23	)		(7	)		29			(98	)
Minority interests’ share		—			—			1			—			1

Net income (loss)	$	(97	)	$	(23	)	$	(6	)	$	29		$	(97	)

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Novelis Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

(In millions)


	As of September 30, 2008 (Successor)
						Non-
	Parent			Guarantors		Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated

ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	29		$	117	$	73		$	—		$	219
Accounts receivable — net of allowances
— third parties		48			915		384			—			1,347
— related parties		623			287		29			(915	)		24
Inventories		70			936		407			—			1,413
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		5			52		18			—			75
Current portion of fair value of derivative instruments		—			198		53			(14	)		237
Deferred income tax assets		—			170		16			—			186

Total current assets		775			2,675		980			(929	)		3,501
Property, plant and equipment — net		168			2,296		568			—			3,032
Goodwill		—			1,858		6			—			1,864
Intangible assets — net		—			827		—			—			827
Investments		3,495			923		1			(3,495	)		924
Fair value of derivative instruments — net of current portion		1			24		23			(2	)		46
Deferred income tax assets		8			—		2			—			10
Other long-term assets		1,065			139		7			(1,091	)		120

Total assets	$	5,512		$	8,742	$	1,587		$	(5,517	)	$	10,324


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	3		$	10	$	1		$	—		$	14
Short-term borrowings
— third parties		1			328		22			—			351
— related parties		10			479		13			(502	)		—
Accounts payable
— third parties		72			825		521			—			1,418
— related parties		116			223		127			(409	)		57
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		43			776		164			(18	)		965
Deferred income tax liabilities		—			34		—			—			34

Total current liabilities		245			2,675		848			(929	)		2,839
Long-term debt — net of current portion
— third parties		1,757			686		101			—			2,544
— related parties		—			1,010		81			(1,091	)		—
Deferred income tax liabilities		—			537		20			—			557
Accrued postretirement benefits		22			292		106			—			420
Other long-term liabilities		103			328		28			(2	)		457

		2,127			5,528		1,184			(2,022	)		6,817

Commitments and contingencies
Minority interests in equity of consolidated affiliates		—			—		122			—			122

Shareholder’s equity
Common stock		—			—		—			—			—
Additional paid-in capital		3,497			—		—			—			3,497
Retained earnings/(accumulated deficit)/owner’s net investment		(98	)		3,182		381			(3,563	)		(98	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(14	)		32		(100	)		68			(14	)

Total shareholder’s equity		3,385			3,214		281			(3,495	)		3,385

Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity	$	5,512		$	8,742	$	1,587		$	(5,517	)	$	10,324

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Novelis Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

(In millions)


	As of March 31, 2008 (Successor)
						Non-
Restated	Parent			Guarantors		Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated

ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	12		$	177	$	137		$	—		$	326
Accounts receivable — net of allowances
— third parties		38			818		392			—			1,248
— related parties		518			289		34			(810	)		31
Inventories		57			993		405			—			1,455
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		4			35		19			—			58
Current portion of fair value of derivative instruments		—			186		30			(13	)		203
Deferred income tax assets		—			121		4			—			125

Total current assets		629			2,619		1,021			(823	)		3,446
Property, plant and equipment — net		175			2,458		724			—			3,357
Goodwill		—			1,680		189			—			1,869
Intangible assets — net		—			888		—			—			888
Investments		3,629			945		1			(3,629	)		946
Fair value of derivative instruments — net of current portion		—			18		3			—			21
Deferred income tax assets		10			—		2			—			12
Other long-term assets		1,328			160		135			(1,480	)		143

Total assets	$	5,771		$	8,768	$	2,075		$	(5,932	)	$	10,682


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	3		$	11	$	1		$	—		$	15
Short-term borrowings
— third parties		—			70		45			—			115
— related parties		5			370		25			(400	)		—
Accounts payable
— third parties		84			925		573			—			1,582
— related parties		110			233		88			(376	)		55
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		39			699		129			(17	)		850
Deferred income tax liabilities		—			39		—			—			39

Total current liabilities		241			2,347		861			(793	)		2,656
Long-term debt — net of current portion
— third parties		1,761			698		101			—			2,560
— related parties		—			1,206		304			(1,510	)		—
Deferred income tax liabilities		1			680		20			—			701
Accrued postretirement benefits		23			297		101			—			421
Other long-term liabilities		222			431		19			—			672

		2,248			5,659		1,406			(2,303	)		7,010

Commitments and contingencies
Minority interests in equity of consolidated affiliates		—			—		149			—			149

Shareholder’s equity
Common stock		—			—		—			—			—
Additional paid-in capital		3,497			—		—			—			3,497
Retained earnings/(accumulated deficit)/owner’s net investment		(20	)		3,075		564			(3,639	)		(20	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		46			34		(44	)		10			46

Total shareholder’s equity		3,523			3,109		520			(3,629	)		3,523

Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity	$	5,771		$	8,768	$	2,075		$	(5,932	)	$	10,682

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Novelis Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

(In millions)


	Six Months Ended September 30, 2008 (Successor)
							Non-
	Parent			Guarantors			Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	15		$	(272	)	$	(24	)	$	(109	)	$	(390	)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures		(3	)		(50	)		(17	)		—			(70	)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment		—			1			1			—			2
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates		—			13			—			—			13
Proceeds from loans receivable — net — related parties		—			13			—			—			13
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments		—			66			28			—			94

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(3	)		43			12			—			52

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal repayments
— third parties		(1	)		(5	)		(1	)		—			(7	)
— related parties		—			(89	)		(140	)		229			—
Short-term borrowings — net
— third parties		—			279			(16	)		—			263
— related parties		6			(10	)		124			(120	)		—
Dividends — minority interests		—			—			(5	)		—			(5	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		5			175			(38	)		109			251

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		17			(54	)		(50	)		—			(87	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in foreign currencies		—			(6	)		(14	)		—			(20	)
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period		12			177			137			—			326

Cash and cash equivalents — end of period	$	29		$	117		$	73		$	—		$	219

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Novelis Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
(In millions)


	May 16, 2007 Through September 30, 2007 (Successor)
							Non-
Restated	Parent			Guarantors			Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	125		$	(129	)	$	7		$	—		$	3

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures		(5	)		(47	)		(5	)		—			(57	)
Proceeds from sales of assets		—			—			1			—			1
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates		(40	)		3			—			40			3
Proceeds from loans receivable — net — related parties		—			10			—			—			10
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments		26			48			(2	)		—			72

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(19	)		14			(6	)		40			29

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		92			40			—			(40	)		92
Proceeds from issuance of debt		300			660			—			—			960
Principal repayments		(260	)		(603	)		(42	)		—			(905	)
Short-term borrowings — net
— third parties		(45	)		(67	)		47			—			(65	)
— related parties		(157	)		139			18			—			—
Dividends — minority interests		—			—			(1	)		—			(1	)
Debt issuance costs		(35	)		—			—			—			(35	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(105	)		169			22			(40	)		46

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		1			54			23			—			78
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in foreign currencies		—			—			1			—			1
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period		8			74			20			—			102

Cash and cash equivalents — end of period	$	9		$	128		$	44		$	—		$	181

Novelis Inc.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) — (Continued)

Novelis Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

(In millions)


	April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007 (Predecessor)
							Non-
	Parent			Guarantors			Guarantors			Eliminations		Consolidated

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(21	)	$	(181	)	$	(28	)	$	—	$	(230	)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures		(1	)		(10	)		(6	)		—		(17	)
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates		—			1			—			—		1
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments		(5	)		23			—			—		18

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(6	)		14			(6	)		—		2

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of debt		—			150			—			—		150
Principal repayments		—			(1	)		—			—		(1	)
Short-term borrowings — net
— third parties		45			9			6			—		60
— related parties		(15	)		11			4			—		—
Dividends — minority interests		—			—			(7	)		—		(7	)
Debt issuance costs		(2	)		—			—			—		(2	)
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options		1			—			—			—		1

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		29			169			3			—		201

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		2			2			(31	)		—		(27	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in foreign currencies		—			1			—			—		1
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period		6			71			51			—		128

Cash and cash equivalents — end of period	$	8		$	74		$	20		$	—	$	102


Item 2.	*Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations*

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

The following information should be read together with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report for a more complete understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below, particularly in “SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET DATA.”

REFERENCES

References to our Form 10-K/A made throughout this document refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2008, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on August 11, 2008.

GENERAL

Novelis is the world’s leading aluminum rolled products producer based on shipment volume. We produce aluminum sheet and light gauge products for the beverage and food can, transportation, construction and industrial, and foil products markets. As of September 30, 2008, we had operations on four continents: North America; South America; Asia and Europe, through 32 operating plants, one research facility and several market-focused innovation centers in 11 countries. In addition to aluminum rolled products plants, our South American businesses include bauxite mining, alumina refining, primary aluminum smelting and power generation facilities that are integrated with our rolling plants in Brazil. We are the only company of our size and scope focused solely on aluminum rolled products markets and capable of local supply of technologically sophisticated products in all of these geographic regions.

Restatement

As discussed in Note 2 — Restatement of Financial Statements in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, we restated our consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2008 and our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) and of cash flows for the period from May 16, 2007 through September 30, 2007 to correct non-cash accounting errors in our application of purchase accounting for an equity method investment which led to a misstatement of our provision for income taxes during the period we were finalizing our purchase accounting. We also corrected other miscellaneous adjustments that were deemed to be not material by management, either individually or in the aggregate. These adjustments do not have an impact on our compliance with the financial covenants under our 7.25% Senior Notes or under our New Senior Secured Credit Facilities (see Note 8 — Debt to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements). The unaudited interim financial statements for the period from May 15, 2007 through September 30, 2007, used herein, have been restated.

Acquisition of Novelis Common Stock

As discussed in Note 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, the Arrangement was recorded in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 103, Push Down Basis of Accounting Required in Certain Limited Circumstances (SAB No. 103). Accordingly, in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, the consideration and related costs paid by Hindalco in connection with the acquisition have been “pushed down” to us and have been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 141, Business Combinations. Due to the impact of push down accounting, the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements and certain note presentations separate the Company’s presentation into two distinct periods to indicate the application of two different bases of accounting between the periods presented: (1) the period up to, and including, the acquisition date (April 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007, labeled “Predecessor”) and (2) the period after that date (May 16, 2007 through June 30, 2007, labeled “Successor”). The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include a black line division which indicates that the Predecessor and Successor reporting entities shown are not comparable.

NOTE REGARDING COMBINED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING INFORMATION DUE TO THE ACQUISITION

As discussed above, the Arrangement created a new basis of accounting. Under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP), the condensed consolidated financial statements for the six months ended September 30, 2007 are presented in two distinct periods, as Predecessor and Successor entities are not comparable in all material respects. However, in order to facilitate an understanding of our results of operations for the six months ended September 30, 2008 in comparison with the six months ended September 30, 2007, in this section, our Predecessor results and our Successor results are presented and discussed on a combined basis. The combined results of operations are non-GAAP financial measures, do not include any proforma assumptions or adjustments and should not be used in isolation or substitution of Predecessor and Successor results.

Shown below are combining schedules of (1) shipments and (2) our results of operations for periods allocable to the Successor, Predecessor and the combined presentation for the six months ended September 30, 2007 that we use throughout our Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A).

May 16, 2007

April 1, 2007

Six Months

Through

Ended

September 30, 2007

May 15, 2007

September 30, 2007

Successor

Predecessor

Combined

Combined Shipments:

Shipments (kt)(A):

Rolled products(B)

1,156

348

1,504

Ingot products(C)

Total shipments

1,222

363

1,585


(A)		One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric tonnes. One metric tonne is equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds.

(B)		Rolled products include tolling (the conversion of customer-owned metal).

(C)		Ingot products include primary ingot in Brazil and Europe, foundry products in Korea, secondary ingot in Europe and other miscellaneous recyclable aluminum.


	May 16, 2007			April 1, 2007			Six Months
	Through			Through			Ended
	September 30, 2007			May 15, 2007			September 30, 2007
	(Restated)						(Restated)
	Successor			Predecessor			Combined
Combined Results of Operations ($ in millions)
Net sales	$	4,368		$	1,281		$	5,649

Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)		3,991			1,205			5,196
Selling, general and administrative expenses		130			95			225
Depreciation and amortization		156			28			184
Research and development expenses		23			6			29
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net		81			26			107
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net		16			(20	)		(4	)
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates		(19	)		(1	)		(20	)
Sale transaction fees		—			32			32
Other expenses — net		9			4			13

		4,387			1,375			5,762

Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) and minority interests’ share		(19	)		(94	)		(113	)
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)		47			4			51

Income (loss) before minority interests’ share		(66	)		(98	)		(164	)
Minority interests’ share		2			1			3

Net income (loss)	$	(64	)	$	(97	)	$	(161	)

HIGHLIGHTS

Significant highlights, events and factors impacting our business during the quarters and six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are presented briefly below. Each is discussed in further detail throughout MD&A.


	•	Shipments and selected financial information are as follows ($ in millions):


	Three Months						Six Months
	Ended						Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
				(Restated)						(Restated)
	Successor			Successor			Successor			Combined

Shipments (kt)(A):
Rolled products(B)		759			747			1,536			1,504
Ingot products(C)		49			42			97			81

Total shipments		808			789			1,633			1,585

Net sales	$	2,959		$	2,821		$	6,062		$	5,649
Net income (loss)(D)	$	(103	)	$	(19	)	$	(78	)	$	(161	)
Net increase (decrease) in total debt(E)	$	(86	)	$	(43	)	$	222		$	205


(A)		One kilotonne (kt) is 1,000 metric tonnes. One metric tonne is equivalent to 2,204.6 pounds.

(B)		Rolled products include tolling (the conversion of customer-owned metal).


(C)		Ingot products include primary ingot in Brazil and Europe, foundry products in Korea, secondary ingot in Europe and other miscellaneous recyclable aluminum.

(D)		Net income (loss) for the three and six months ended September 30, 2007 has been restated. See Note 2 — Restatement of Financial Statements to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

(E)		Net increase (decrease) in total debt is measured comparing the period-end amounts of our total outstanding debt (including short-term borrowings) as shown in our condensed consolidated balance sheets to (1) the preceding quarter-end balances for the three month periods and (2) the prior fiscal year end as of March 31 for the six month periods. The net increase (decrease) in total debt excludes the change in unamortized fair value adjustments recorded as part of the Arrangement.

Markets for aluminum, energy and currencies have become increasingly volatile:


	•	London Metal Exchange (LME) pricing rose to a peak of $3,292 per tonne in July 2008 before subsequently dropping to $2,395 per tonne as of September 30, 2008. LME prices continued to decline during the month of October 2008.

	•	When compared to the prior year, the pre-tax loss for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 included approximately $200 million of non-cash unrealized losses on derivative instruments which are used to hedge forecasted purchases of aluminum and other commodities as well as related foreign currency exposures. In future periods, the losses on these hedging instruments should be offset by the benefits of lower commodity costs, more favorable currency relationships and the reduced impact of contracts with metal price ceilings. Unrealized losses on derivative instruments were $134 million higher than in the prior-year quarter and are net of $61 million of unrealized gains related to derivative instruments that hedge the income statement re-measurement of foreign currency denominated working capital and debt balances.

	•	Despite price declines that began in late July 2008, average LME aluminum prices were 9.6% and 8.0% higher than prior year during the quarter and year-to-date periods, respectively. Net sales for fiscal 2009 increased from the comparable prior year periods primarily due to this increase in average LME metal pricing and a modest increase in shipments.

	•	Costs associated with currency exposure primarily related to the euro and Brazilian real were higher in fiscal 2009 than in the comparable prior year periods as the average exchange rates for the euro and real reflected a weaker U.S. dollar. However, during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and through the month of October 2008 the U.S dollar strengthened against these currencies.

Global economic trends impact the Company and are uncertain:


	•	The full impact of recent events in the global financial services industry and their effects on global consumer demand remains uncertain. However, during October 2008 we experienced weak demand in North America, Europe and Asia particularly in construction and automotive markets. We have also seen an increased valuation of the U.S. dollar, declines in energy pricing and sharp declines in the pricing of primary aluminum. In the long term we should benefit from these currency and commodity movements. However, in the near term we expect customer demand to be uncertain and volatility in currency and commodity markets to remain high.

	•	Rolled products shipments during the current quarter and year-to-date periods were stable with increases in canstock offset by decreases in light gauge products as a result of weak market demand, specialty and painted products as a result of weak market conditions for building-related products and weak demand in the electronics sector, and foil stock.

Losses before income taxes increased:


	•	Increased losses were attributable to the change in fair value of derivative instruments were driven by the mark-to-market impact of LME forward purchase contracts used to hedge metal price risk related to specific


		customer orders that include fixed sales prices and forecasted sales subject to metal price ceilings. The losses are partially offset by gains on LME forward sales contracts that are used to hedge output from our primary aluminum operations and metal price lag associated with customer orders that include formula pricing.


	•	Input and operational costs were higher in the fiscal 2009 period than in the comparable prior year periods primarily as a result of higher energy, freight and alloy costs.

	•	The fiscal 2009 periods were unfavorably impacted compared to the prior year periods for certain income and expense items associated with fair value adjustments recorded at the date of acquisition, driven by lower accretion of reserves related to unfavorable contracts.

Income taxes were affected:


	•	We recorded income tax benefits in the fiscal 2009 periods compared to income tax expense in the comparable prior year periods primarily due to tax benefits related to exchange translation and re-measurement items and statutory tax rate differences on foreign earnings.

Free cash flow deteriorated but liquidity remains strong:


	•	Free cash flow during the six month period decreased by $152 million in fiscal 2009 from the comparable prior year period due to changes in certain components of our working capital (exclusive of the impact of currency translation adjustments) primarily driven by higher dollar inventory levels due to the increase in average aluminum prices in the first half of this fiscal year and the timing of payments made by our customers at March 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, and partially offset by our smaller net loss for the six month period.

	•	During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we repaid $86 million of our total debt.

	•	Our estimated liquidity was $583 million at September 30, 2008.

OUR BUSINESS

Business Model and Key Concepts

Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model, which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products have a price structure with two components: (i) a pass-through aluminum price based on the LME plus local market premiums and (ii) a “conversion premium” price on the conversion cost to produce the rolled product and the competitive market conditions for that product.

Metal represents approximately 60% — 70% of the sales value of our products and 70% — 80% of our input costs.

Metal Price Ceilings

Sales contracts representing approximately 8% and 10% of our total shipments for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and 8% and 10% of our total shipments for the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, provide for a ceiling over which metal prices could not contractually be passed through to certain customers, unless adjusted. This negatively impacts our margins when the price we pay for metal is above the ceiling price contained in these contracts. During the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, we were unable to pass through approximately $74 million and $61 million, respectively, of metal purchase costs associated with sales under these contracts. During the six month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, we were unable to pass through approximately $152 million and $139 million, respectively, of metal purchase costs associated with sales under these contracts. We calculate and report this difference to be approximately the difference between the quoted purchase price on the LME (adjusted for any local premiums and for any price lag associated with purchasing or processing time) and the metal price ceiling in our contracts. Cash flows from operations are negatively impacted by the same amounts, adjusted for any timing difference between customer receipts and vendor payments, and offset partially by reduced income taxes.

Our exposure to metal price ceilings approximates 8% of estimated total shipments for the remainder of fiscal year 2009. Based on a September 30, 2008 aluminum price of $2,395 per tonne, and our best estimate of a range of shipment volumes, we estimate that we will be unable to pass through aluminum purchase costs of approximately $74 — $79 million for the remainder of fiscal 2009 and $112 — $121 million in the aggregate thereafter.

In connection with the allocation of purchase price (i.e., total consideration) paid by Hindalco, we established reserves totaling $655 million as of May 15, 2007 to record these contracts at fair value. Fair value effectively represents the discounted cash flows of the forecasted metal purchase costs in excess of the metal price ceilings contained in these contracts. These reserves are being accreted into Net sales over the remaining lives of the underlying contracts, and this accretion will not impact future cash flows. For the three and six months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded accretion of $61 million and $125 million, respectively. The three and six months ended September 30, 2007 included accretion of $85 million and $129 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2008, the balance of these reserves is approximately $260 million.

We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from our recycling operations which utilize used beverage cans (UBCs). Both of these sources of aluminum supply have historically provided an offsetting benefit to the metal price ceiling contracts. We refer to these two sources as our internal hedges.

Beyond our internal hedges described above, our third strategy to mitigate the risk of loss or reduced profitability associated with the metal price ceilings is to purchase derivative instruments on projected aluminum volume requirements above our assumed internal hedge position. We currently purchase aluminum futures and options to hedge our exposure to further metal price increases.

Metal Price Lag

On certain sales contracts we experience timing differences on the pass through of changing aluminum prices based on the difference between the price we pay for aluminum and the price we ultimately charge our customers after the aluminum is processed. Generally, and in the short-term, in periods of rising prices our earnings benefit from this timing difference while the opposite is true in periods of declining prices, and we refer to this timing difference as “metal price lag.” During the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, metal price lag negatively impacted our results by approximately $8 million and $9 million, respectively, for a net favorable impact of $1 million between the periods. During the six months ended September 30, 2008, metal price lag favorably impacted our results by $26 million and negatively impacted the comparable prior year period by approximately $20 million, for a net favorable impact of $46 million between the periods. These amounts include the effects of derivative instruments we purchased to offset this risk as described below. For general metal price lag exposure we used short-term LME forward contracts to help mitigate the exposure, although exact offset hedging is not achieved.

Certain of our sales contracts, most notably in Europe, contain fixed metal prices for periods of time such as four to thirty-six months. In some cases, this can result in a negative (positive) impact on sales, compared to current prices, as metal prices increase (decrease) because the prices are fixed at historical levels. The positive or negative impact on sales under these contracts has not been included in the metal price lag effect quantified above, as we enter into forward metal purchases simultaneous with the sales contracts thereby mitigating the exposure to changing metal prices on sales under these contracts.

The impacts of the above mentioned items on Net sales and Segment Income are described more fully in the Operations and Segment Review where appropriate.

For accounting purposes, we do not treat all derivative instruments as hedges under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FASB Statement No. 133). For example, we do not treat the derivative instruments purchased to mitigate the risks discussed above under metal price ceilings and metal price lag as hedges under FASB Statement No. 133. In those cases, changes in

fair value are recognized immediately in earnings, which results in the recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of the contract settlement, and we expect further earnings volatility as a result. In the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations, changes in fair value of derivative instruments not accounted for as hedges under FASB Statement No. 133 are recognized in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net. These gains or losses may or may not result from cash settlement. For Segment Income purposes we only include the impact of the derivative gains or losses to the extent they are settled in cash during that period.

OPERATIONS AND SEGMENT REVIEW

The following tables present our shipments, our results of operations, prices for aluminum, oil and natural gas and key currency exchange rates for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and the changes from period to period.


	Three Months							Six Months
	Ended							Ended
	September 30,				Percent			September 30,				Percent
	2008		2007		Change			2008		2007		Change
	Successor		Successor					Successor		Combined

Shipments (kt):
Rolled products, including tolling (the conversion of customer-owned metal)		759		747		1.6	%		1,536		1,504		2.1	%
Ingot products, including primary and secondary ingot and recyclable aluminum		49		42		16.7	%		97		81		19.8	%

Total shipments		808		789		2.4	%		1,633		1,585		3.0	%


	Three Months									Six Months
	Ended									Ended
	September 30,						Percent			September 30,						Percent
	2008			2007			Change			2008			2007			Change
				(Restated)									(Restated)
	Successor			Successor						Successor			Combined

Results of Operations ($ in millions)
Net sales	$	2,959		$	2,821			4.9	%	$	6,062		$	5,649			7.3	%

Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)		2,791			2,555			9.2	%		5,622			5,196			8.2	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		89			88			1.1	%		173			225			(23.1	)%
Depreciation and amortization		107			103			3.9	%		223			184			21.2	%
Research and development expenses		10			10			—	%		22			29			(24.1	)%
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net		41			56			(26.8	)%		81			107			(24.3	)%
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivatives — net		185			30			516.7	%		119			(4	)		n.m.
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates		(2	)		(20	)		(90.0	)%		—			(20	)		n.m.
Sale transaction fees		—			—			—	%		—			32			n.m.
Other (income) expenses — net		10			(2	)		(600.0	)%		32			13			146.2	%

		3,231			2,820			14.6	%		6,272			5,762			8.9	%

Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss) and minority interests’ share		(272	)		1			n.m.			(210	)		(113	)		85.8	%
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)		(169	)		20			n.m.			(134	)		51			n.m.

Income (loss) before minority interests’ share		(103	)		(19	)		442.1	%		(76	)		(164	)		(53.7	)%
Minority interests’ share		—			—			—	%		(2	)		3			n.m.

Net income (loss)	$	(103	)	$	(19	)		442.1	%	$	(78	)	$	(161	)		(51.6	)%

n.m. — not meaningful


	Three Months							Six Months
	Ended							Ended
	September 30,				Percent			September 30,				Percent
	2008		2007		Change			2008		2007		Change
	Successor		Successor					Successor		Combined

London Metal Exchange Prices
Aluminum (per metric tonne, and presented in U.S. dollars):
Closing cash price as of end of period	$	2,395	$	2,440		(1.8	)%	$	2,395	$	2,440		(1.8	)%
Average cash price during the period	$	2,792	$	2,547		9.6	%	$	2,865	$	2,654		8.0	%


	Three Months							Six Months
	Ended				U.S. Dollar			Ended				U.S. Dollar
	September 30,				Strengthen/			September 30,				Strengthen/
	2008		2007		(Weaken)			2008		2007		(Weaken)
	Successor		Successor					Successor		Combined

Federal Reserve Bank of New York Exchange Rates
Average of the month end rates:
U.S. dollar per Euro		1.478		1.386		(6.6	)%		1.520		1.370		(10.9	)%
Brazilian real per U.S. dollar		1.708		1.891		(9.7	)%		1.673		1.926		(13.1	)%
South Korean won per U.S. dollar		1,102		924		19.3	%		1,065		925		15.1	%
Canadian dollar per U.S. dollar		1.050		1.039		1.1	%		1.028		1.060		(3.0	)%


	Three Months							Six Months
	Ended							Ended
	September 30,				Percent			September 30,				Percent
	2008		2007		Change			2008		2007		Change
	Successor		Successor					Successor		Combined

New York Mercantile Exchange — Energy Price Quotations
Light Sweet Crude
Average settlement price (per barrel)	$	125.85	$	71.08		77.1	%	$	121.81	$	66.39		83.5	%
Natural Gas
Average Henry Hub contract settlement price (per MMBTU)(A)	$	10.24	$	6.16		66.2	%	$	10.58	$	6.85		54.5	%


(A)		One MMBTU is the equivalent of one decatherm, or one million British Thermal Units.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 COMPARED TO THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007

Shipments

Rolled products shipments were stable during the second quarter of fiscal 2009 primarily due to (1) increases in canstock with continued demand in the can markets in North America, South America and Asia and (2) increases in other miscellaneous rolled products in North America, partially offset by decreases in (3) light gauge primarily in North America and Europe as a result of weak market demand, (4) specialty and painted products in Europe as a result of weak market conditions for building-related products, (5) specialty products in Asia as a result of weak demand in electronics products and (6) foil stock in Europe and Asia. Shipments of ingot products increased during the second quarter of fiscal 2009 due to sale of ingot and scrap primarily in Europe, as we sold additional ingot to manage inventory levels due to slower business conditions.

Net sales

Net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 increased from the comparable prior year period primarily due to (1) an increase of $151 million as a result of a 9.6% increase in average LME metal pricing, (2) an increase of $7 million in conversion premiums primarily in Europe and Asia, (3) an increase of $29 million from foreign currency exchange gains primarily in Europe driven by a strengthened euro against the U.S. dollar, partially offset by exchange losses in Asia due to a weakening of the Korean won, (4) an increase of $24 million due to a favorable change in the product mix of rolled products primarily in South America, offset by an unfavorable change in mix in Europe and (5) an increase of $34 million in the sale of ingot and scrap primarily in Europe as we sold additional ingot to manage inventory levels due to slower business conditions, partially offset by (6) $68 million of lower metal price lag in North America and Asia and (7) $26 million of lower incremental purchase accounting adjustments primarily related to the accretion of can ceiling contract

fair value reserves in North America. The impact of changes in the volume of rolled products on net sales was neutral between the periods as increases in North America, Asia and South America were offset by decreases in Europe.

Additionally, net sales for the second quarter of both fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 were adversely impacted in North America due to price ceilings on certain sales contracts, which limited our ability to pass through approximately $74 million and $61 million, respectively, of metal purchase costs resulting in $13 million of lower sales period over period.

Costs and expenses

The following table presents our costs and expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, in dollars and expressed as percentages of net sales.


	Three Months
	Ended
	September 30,
	2008						2007
				% of						% of
	$ in millions			net sales			$ in millions			net sales
							(Restated)
	Successor						Successor

Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)	$	2,791			94.3	%	$	2,555			90.6	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		89			3.0	%		88			3.1	%
Depreciation and amortization		107			3.6	%		103			3.7	%
Research and development expenses		10			0.3	%		10			0.4	%
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net		41			1.4	%		56			2.0	%
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net		185			6.3	%		30			1.1	%
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates		(2	)		(0.1	)%		(20	)		(0.7	)%
Other (income) expenses — net		10			0.3	%		(2	)		(0.1	)%

	$	3,231			109.2	%	$	2,820			100.0	%

Cost of goods sold. As a percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold worsened as a result of (1) increased costs of production such as energy, freight, and alloys and (2) lower incremental purchase accounting adjustments related to the accretion of can ceiling contract fair value reserves into revenue.

Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net. Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs decreased primarily due to lower average interest rates on our variable rate debt.

(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net. Higher losses in the fiscal 2009 period over the fiscal 2008 period resulted primarily from the mark-to-market impact of LME forward purchase contracts used to hedge metal price risk related to specific customer orders that include fixed sales prices and forecasted sales subject to metal price ceilings. These losses were partially offset by gains on LME forward sales contracts that are used to hedge output from our primary aluminum operations in Brazil and metal price lag associated with customer orders that include formula pricing.

Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates. The amount reported in the fiscal 2008 period reflects the favorable impact of the revaluation of deferred tax liabilities recorded inside our Aluminium Norf GmbH equity investment in Europe due to a change in the German statutory tax rate.

Other (income) expenses — net. A reconciliation of the difference between the periods is shown below (in millions):


	Other
	(Income)
	Expenses — Net

Other (income) expenses — net for the three months ended September 30, 2007	$	(2	)
Exchange losses of $36 million in 2009 compared to $8 million in 2008		28
Gain on reversal of accrued legal claim of $26 million in 2009 only		(26	)
Gain on partial reversal of accrued social contribution tax of $14 million in 2008 only		14
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment — net of $1 million in 2009 only		(1	)
Other — net		(3	)

Other (income) expenses — net for the three months ended September 30, 2008	$	10

Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)

For the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded a $169 million benefit for taxes on our pre-tax loss of $274 million, before our equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests’ share, which represented an effective tax rate of 62%. Our effective tax rate differs from the benefit at the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the following factors: (1) $22 million benefit for (a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect, (2) a $41 million benefit for exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes, (3) a $15 million increase in valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize those losses, (4) a $10 million provision from expense/income items with no tax effect — net, and (5) a $54 million benefit from differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign effective tax rates applied to entities in different jurisdictions.

For the three months ended September 30, 2007, we recorded a $20 million (as restated) provision for taxes on our pre-tax loss of $19 million, before our equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests’ share, which represented an effective tax rate of (105)%. Our effective tax rate differs from the benefit at the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the following factors: (1) a provision of $30 million (as restated) for (a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect, (2) a $19 million increase in valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize those losses, partially offset by (3) a $25 million benefit (as restated) from the effects of enacted tax rate changes on cumulative taxable temporary differences.

OPERATING SEGMENT REVIEW FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 COMPARED TO THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007

We measure the profitability and financial performance of our operating segments, based on Segment Income, in accordance with FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosure About the Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. Segment Income provides a measure of our underlying segment results that is in line with our portfolio approach to risk management.

Net sales and expenses are measured in accordance with the policies and procedures described in Note 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated and combined financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2008.

We do not treat all derivative instruments as hedges under FASB Statement No. 133. Accordingly, changes in fair value are recognized immediately in earnings, which results in the recognition of fair value as a gain or loss in advance of the contract settlement. In the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations, changes in fair value of derivative instruments not accounted for as hedges under FASB Statement No. 133 are recognized in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net. These gains or losses may or may not result from cash settlement. For Segment Income purposes we only include the impact of the derivative gains or losses to the extent they are settled in cash (i.e., realized) during that period.

Reconciliation

The following table presents Segment Income by operating segment and reconciles Total Segment Income to Net income (loss) (in millions).


	Three Months
	Ended
	September 30,
	2008			2007
				(Restated)
	Successor			Successor

Segment Income
North America	$	2		$	89
Europe		62			68
Asia		(3	)		18
South America		48			46

Total Segment Income		109			221
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net		(41	)		(56	)
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net(A)		(221	)		(87	)
Realized gains (losses) on corporate derivative instruments — net		—			30
Depreciation and amortization		(107	)		(103	)
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation(B)		(18	)		7
Gains (losses) on disposal of property, plant, equipment and businesses — net		1			—
Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses		(16	)		(16	)
Other costs — net		21			5
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)		169			(20	)

Net income (loss)	$	(103	)	$	(19	)


	(A)	Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net represents the portion of gains (losses) that were not settled in cash during the period.


	(B)	Our financial information for our segments (including Segment Income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent with the way we manage our business segments. However, under GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to reconcile Total Segment Income to Net income (loss), the proportional Segment Income of these non-consolidated affiliates is removed from Total Segment Income, net of our share of their net after-tax results, which is reported as Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates on our condensed consolidated


		statements of operations. See Note 6 — Investment in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for further information about these non-consolidated affiliates.

OPERATING SEGMENT RESULTS

North America

As of September 30, 2008, North America manufactured aluminum sheet and light gauge products through nine aluminum rolled products facilities and two dedicated recycling facilities. Important end-use applications include beverage cans, containers and packaging, automotive and other transportation applications, building products and other industrial applications.

The following table presents key financial and operating information for North America for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in millions, except for shipments, which are in kt).


	Three Months
	Ended
	September 30,				Percent
	2008		2007		Change
			(Restated)
	Successor		Successor

Shipments (kt):
Rolled products		293		279		5.0	%
Ingot products		15		17		(11.8	)%

Total shipments		308		296		4.1	%

Net sales	$	1,111	$	1,050		5.8	%
Segment Income	$	2	$	89		(97.8	)%
Total assets	$	4,003	$	4,463		(10.3	)%

Shipments

Rolled products shipments increased due to increases in demand in canstock and other miscellaneous rolled products, partially offset by decreases in demand for light gauge products as a result of a weak demand in construction and transportation industries. Ingot product shipments declined due to lower scrap sales.

Net sales

Net sales increased primarily due to (1) increased volume of rolled products of $64 million and (2) increased average LME prices for metal of $91 million, partially offset by (3) $24 million of lower incremental accretion related to the contract fair value reserves as discussed in Metal Price Ceilings and (4) contracts priced in prior periods resulting in a lower metal price lag of $49 million. Additionally, during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, we were unable to pass through approximately $74 million and $61 million, respectively, of metal purchase costs due to price ceilings on certain sales contracts, resulting in a $13 million unfavorable impact to net sales period over period.

Segment Income

Segment Income was unfavorably impacted by (1) $5 million as a result of unfavorable changes in product mix, (2) the negative impact of metal price lag of $29 million, (3) $8 million resulting from the impact of the metal price ceilings (excluding the accretion of the contract fair value reserves), (4) increased net foreign currency exchange losses of $6 million, (5) the favorable impact of purchase accounting was $24 million lower during the 2009 period and (6) higher operating costs of $21 million primarily associated with energy and freight, partially offset by (7) $6 million due to higher volume of shipments.

Total Assets

Total assets decreased primarily due to the finalization of adjustments to our purchase price allocation made subsequent to the comparable period in fiscal 2008.

Europe

As of September 30, 2008, Europe provided European markets with value-added sheet and light gauge products through its 13 aluminum rolled products facilities and one dedicated recycling facility. Europe serves a broad range of aluminum rolled product end-use markets in various applications including can, packaging, automotive, lithographic, building and other various industrial uses.

The following table presents key financial and operating information for Europe for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in millions, except for shipments, which are in kt).


	Three Months
	Ended
	September 30,				Percent
	2008		2007		Change
			(Restated)
	Successor		Successor

Shipments (kt):
Rolled products		254		275		(7.6	)%
Ingot products		27		8		237.5	%

Total shipments		281		283		(0.7	)%

Net sales	$	1,097	$	1,092		0.5	%
Segment Income	$	62	$	68		(8.8	)%
Total assets	$	3,775	$	3,227		17.0	%

Shipments

Rolled products shipments decreased due to decreases in demand for specialty, painted and light gauge products from a continued weak building-related products market and demand for foil stock. Ingot product shipments increased during the second quarter of fiscal 2009 as we sold additional ingot to manage inventory levels due to slower business conditions.

Net sales

Net sales were flat despite the impacts of (1) increased average LME prices for metal of $15 million, (2) an increase of $34 million from foreign currency exchange gains driven by the stronger euro against the U.S. dollar, (3) increases in conversion premiums of $13 million and (4) increased volume of ingot products of $59 million. These factors were largely offset by (5) decreased volume in rolled products of $89 million and (6) unfavorable changes in product mix of $23 million.

Segment Income

Segment Income was unfavorably impacted by (1) $13 million from lower volume of rolled product shipments, (2) increased net foreign currency exchange losses of $32 million and (3) higher operating costs of $10 million primarily associated with energy, partially offset by (4) $13 million due to higher pricing, (5) the positive impact of metal price lag of $31 million and (6) the favorable impact of purchase accounting which was $4 million higher during the 2009 period.

Total Assets

Total assets increased primarily due to the finalization of adjustments to our purchase price allocation made subsequent to the comparable period in fiscal 2008.

Asia

As of September 30, 2008, Asia operated three manufacturing facilities, with production balanced between foil, construction and industrial, and beverage and food can end-use applications.

The following table presents key financial and operating information for Asia for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in millions, except for shipments, which are in kt).


	Three Months
	Ended
	September 30,					Percent
	2008			2007		Change
				(Restated)
	Successor			Successor

Shipments (kt):
Rolled products		122			116		5.2	%
Ingot products		4			10		(60.0	)%

Total shipments		126			126		—	%

Net sales	$	458		$	438		4.6	%
Segment Income	$	(3	)	$	18		(116.7	)%
Total assets	$	985		$	1,361		(27.6	)%

Shipments

Rolled products shipments increased primarily due to increased demand in the can market, partially offset by a decline of shipments in the industrial products and foil stock markets as a result of continued price pressure from Chinese exports, driven by the difference in aluminum metal prices on the Shanghai Futures Exchange and the LME as well as a weakened demand in the electronics sector. Ingot products shipments decreased as a result of exiting our foundry business in Korea.

Net sales

Net sales increased primarily due to (1) increases in conversion premiums of $7 million, (2) increased volume of rolled products of $20 million and (3) increased average LME prices for metal of $29 million, partially offset by (4) contracts priced in prior periods resulting in a lower metal price lag of $19 million and (5) decreased volume and sales in ingot products of $16 million as we exit our foundry business in Korea.

Segment Income

Segment Income was unfavorably impacted by (1) $31 million in net foreign currency exchange losses as the U.S. dollar strengthened against the Korean won and (2) higher operating costs of $4 million primarily associated with energy, partially offset by (3) $7 million due to higher prices and (4) the positive impact of metal price lag of $8 million.

Total assets

Total assets decreased primarily due to the finalization of adjustments to our purchase price allocation made subsequent to the comparable period in fiscal 2008.

South America

As of September 30, 2008, South America operated two rolling plants in Brazil along with two smelters, an alumina refinery, bauxite mines and power generation facilities. South America manufactures various aluminum rolled products, including can stock, automotive and industrial sheet and light gauge for the beverage and food can, construction and industrial and transportation end-use markets.

The following table presents key financial and operating information for South America for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in millions, except for shipments, which are in kt).


	Three Months
	Ended
	September 30,				Percent
	2008		2007		Change
			(Restated)
	Successor		Successor

Shipments (kt):
Rolled products		90		77		16.9	%
Ingot products		3		7		(57.1	)%

Total shipments		93		84		10.7	%

Net sales	$	300	$	241		24.5	%
Segment Income	$	48	$	46		4.3	%
Total assets	$	1,486	$	1,347		10.3	%

Shipments

Rolled products shipments increased primarily due to an increase in overall can shipments driven by strong market demand. Ingot shipments decreased primarily as a result of lower primary billet production.

Net sales

Net sales increased primarily due to (1) increased volume of rolled products of $10 million, (2) favorable changes in product mix of rolled products of $46 million and (3) increased average LME prices for metal of $16 million, partially offset by (4) decreases in conversion premiums of $10 million.

Segment Income

Segment Income was favorably impacted by (1) $5 million due to higher volume of rolled products shipments, (2) the positive impact of metal price lag of $9 million, (3) increased benefit of internally supplied metal from our smelter and the recycling of UBC’s of $12 million and (4) the favorable impact of purchase accounting which was $2 million higher during the 2009 period, offset by (5) $8 million due to lower prices and (6) higher operating costs of $19 million primarily associated with energy.

Total assets

Total assets increased primarily due to the finalization of adjustments to our purchase price allocation made subsequent to the comparable period in fiscal 2008.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 (ON A COMBINED NON-GAAP BASIS)

As discussed above, the Arrangement created a new basis of accounting. Under GAAP, the condensed consolidated financial statements for the six months ended September 30, 2007 are presented in two distinct periods, as Predecessor and Successor entities are not comparable in all material respects. However, in order to facilitate an understanding of our results of operations for the six months ended September 30, 2007 in comparison with the six months ended September 30, 2008, our Predecessor and Successor results are presented herein on a combined basis. The combined results of operations are non-GAAP financial measures and should not be used in isolation or substitution of the Predecessor and Successor results.

Shipments

Rolled products shipments were stable during the six months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to (1) increases in canstock with continued demand in the can markets of all segments and (2) increases in other

miscellaneous rolled products in North America and Europe, partially offset by decreases in (3) light gauge primarily in North America and Europe as a result of weak market demand, (4) specialty and painted products in Europe as a result of weak market conditions for building-related products, (5) specialty products in Asia as a result of weak demand in the electronics sector and (6) foil stock in Europe and Asia. Ingot product shipments increased primarily due to higher scrap and ingot sales in Europe as we sold additional ingot to manage inventory levels due to slower business conditions, partially offset by decreases in ingot product shipments in North America, South America and Asia.

Net sales

Net sales in the six months ended September 30, 2008 increased from the comparable prior year period primarily due to (1) an increase of $277 million as a result of an 8.0% increase in average LME metal pricing, (2) an increase of $29 million in conversion premiums primarily in Europe and Asia, (3) an increase of $59 million from higher rolled products volume primarily in North America, South America and Asia, offset by lower volume in Europe, (4) an increase of $103 million from foreign currency exchange gains primarily in Europe driven by the continued strengthening of the euro against the U.S. dollar, partially offset by exchange losses in Asia due to a weakening of the Korean won, (5) an increase of $55 million due to a favorable change in the product mix of rolled products primarily in South America, offset by an unfavorable change in mix in Europe and (6) an increase of $34 million in the sale of ingot and scrap primarily in Europe as we sold additional ingot to manage inventory levels due to slower business conditions, partially offset by (7) $125 million of lower metal price lag in North America and Asia.

Additionally, net sales for the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were adversely impacted in North America due to price ceilings on certain sales contracts, which limited our ability to pass through approximately $152 million and $139 million, respectively, of metal purchase costs resulting in $13 million of lower sales period over period.

Costs and expenses

The following table presents our costs and expenses for the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, in dollars and expressed as percentages of net sales.


	Six Months
	Ended
	September 30,
	2008					2007
			% of						% of
	$ in Millions		Net Sales			$ in Millions			Net Sales
						(Restated)
	Successor					Combined

Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)	$	5,622		92.7	%	$	5,196			92.0	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		173		2.9	%		225			4.0	%
Depreciation and amortization		223		3.7	%		184			3.3	%
Research and development expenses		22		0.4	%		29			0.5	%
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net		81		1.3	%		107			1.9	%
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net		119		2.0	%		(4	)		(0.1	)%
Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates		—		—	%		(20	)		(0.4	)%
Sale transaction fees		—		—	%		32			0.6	%
Other expenses — net		32		0.5	%		13			0.2	%

	$	6,272		103.5	%	$	5,762			102.0	%

Cost of goods sold. As a percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold worsened as a result of increased costs of production such as energy, freight, and alloys.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A). SG&A decreased primarily as a result of (1) stock compensation expense of $45 million and (2) $4 million in director and officer insurance premiums for tail coverage associated with our acquisition by Hindalco, both incurred in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased $39 million primarily due to the increases in the bases of our property, plant and equipment and intangible assets recorded as a result of the Arrangement.

Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses decreased due to the one-time write off of $9 million of in-process research and development costs resulting from the Arrangement in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.

Sale transaction fees. We incurred $32 million of fees and expenses related to the Arrangement during the first quarter of fiscal 2008.

Other (income) expenses — net. A reconciliation of the difference between the fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 periods is shown below (in millions):


	Other
	(Income)
	Expenses — Net

Other (income) expenses — net for the six months ended September 30, 2007	$	13
Exchange losses of $56 million in 2009 compared to $19 million in 2008		37
Gain on reversal of accrued legal claim of $26 million in 2009 only		(26	)
Gain on partial reversal of accrued social contribution tax of $14 million in 2008 only		14
Restructuring charges (recoveries) — net of $(1) million in 2009 compared to $2 million in 2008		(3	)
Impairment charges on long-lived assets of $1 million in 2009 only		1
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment — net of $2 million in 2009 only		(2	)
Other — net		(2	)

Other (income) expenses — net for the six months ended September 30, 2008	$	32

Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)

For the six months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded a $134 million benefit for taxes on our pre-tax loss of $210 million, before our equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests’ share, which represented an effective tax rate of 64%. Our effective tax rate differs from the benefit at the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the following factors: (1) $13 million benefit for (a) pre-tax

foreign currency gains or losses with no tax effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect, (2) a $21 million benefit for exchange remeasurement of deferred income taxes, (3) an $18 million increase in valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize those losses, and (4) a $68 million benefit from differences between the Canadian statutory and foreign effective tax rates applied to entities in different jurisdictions.

For the six months ended September 30, 2007, we recorded a $51 million (as restated) provision for taxes on our pre-tax loss of $133 million, before our equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates and minority interests’ share, which represented an effective tax rate of (38)% (as restated). Our effective tax rate differs from the benefit at the Canadian statutory rate primarily due to the following factors: (1) $72 million (as restated) for (a) pre-tax foreign currency gains or losses with no tax effect and (b) the tax effect of U.S. dollar denominated currency gains or losses with no pre-tax effect, (2) a $54 million (as restated) increase in valuation allowances primarily related to tax losses in certain jurisdictions where we believe it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize those losses, (3) a $25 million benefit (as restated) from the effects of enacted tax rate changes on cumulative taxable temporary differences and (4) a $28 million benefit (as restated) from expense/income items with no tax effect — net.

OPERATING SEGMENT REVIEW FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 (ON A COMBINED NON-GAAP BASIS)

As discussed above, the Arrangement created a new basis of accounting. Under GAAP, the condensed consolidated financial statements for the six months ended September 30, 2007 are presented in two distinct periods, as Predecessor and Successor entities are not comparable in all material respects. However, in order to facilitate an understanding of our results of operations for the six months ended September 30, 2007 in comparison with the six months ended September 30, 2008, in this section, our Predecessor results and our Successor results are presented and discussed on a combined basis. The combined results of operations are non-GAAP financial measures and should not be used in isolation or substitution of the Predecessor and Successor results.

Net sales

Shown below is the schedule of Net sales by operating segment for periods attributable to the Successor, Predecessor and the combined presentation for the six months ended September 30, 2007 that we use throughout MD&A (in millions).


	May 16, 2007		April 1, 2007		Six Months
	Through		Through		Ended
	September 30, 2007		May 15, 2007		September 30, 2007
	Successor		Predecessor		Combined
Combined Net sales by Operating Segment:
North America	$	1,624	$	446	$	2,070
Europe		1,686		510		2,196
Asia		683		216		899
South America		375		109		484

Total Net sales	$	4,368	$	1,281	$	5,649

Segment Income

Shown below is the schedule of our reconciliation from Total Segment Income (Loss) to Net income (loss) by operating segment for periods attributable to the Successor, Predecessor and the combined presentation for the six months ended September 30, 2007 that we use throughout our MD&A (in millions).


	May 16, 2007			April 1, 2007			Six Months
	Through			Through			Ended
	September 30, 2007			May 15, 2007			September 30, 2007
	(Restated)						(Restated)
	Successor			Predecessor			Combined
Combined Results by Operating Segment:
Segment Income
North America	$	112		$	(24	)	$	88
Europe		111			32			143
Asia		16			6			22
South America		68			18			86

Total Segment Income		307			32			339
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net		(81	)		(26	)		(107	)
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net(A)		(102	)		5			(97	)
Realized gains (losses) on corporate derivative instruments — net		38			(3	)		35
Depreciation and amortization		(156	)		(28	)		(184	)
Minority interests’ share		2			1			3
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation(B)		(2	)		(7	)		(9	)
Restructuring charges — net		(1	)		(1	)		(2	)
Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses		(24	)		(35	)		(59	)
Other costs — net		2			1			3
Sale transaction fees		—			(32	)		(32	)
Provision (benefit) for taxes on income (loss)		(47	)		(4	)		(51	)

Net income (loss)	$	(64	)	$	(97	)	$	(161	)


(A)		Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net represents the portion of gains (losses) that were not settled in cash during the period.

(B)		Our financial information for our segments (including Segment Income) includes the results of our non-consolidated affiliates on a proportionately consolidated basis, which is consistent with the way we manage our business segments. However, under GAAP, these non-consolidated affiliates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Therefore, in order to reconcile Total Segment Income to Net income (loss), the proportional Segment Income of these non-consolidated affiliates is removed from Total Segment Income, net of our share of their net after-tax results, which is reported as Equity in net (income) loss of non-consolidated affiliates on our condensed consolidated statements of operations. See Note 6 — Investment in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Affiliates and Related Party Transactions in the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information about these non-consolidated affiliates.

Reconciliation

The following table presents Segment Income by operating segment and reconciles Total Segment Income to Net income (loss) (in millions).


	Six Months
	Ended
	September 30,
	2008			2007
				(Restated)
	Successor			Combined

Segment Income
North America	$	44		$	88
Europe		173			143
Asia		28			22
South America		95			86

Total Segment Income		340			339
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net		(81	)		(107	)
Unrealized gains (losses) on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net		(200	)		(97	)
Realized gains (losses) on corporate derivative instruments — net		—			35
Depreciation and amortization		(223	)		(184	)
Impairment charges on long-lived assets		(1	)		—
Minority interests’ share		(2	)		3
Adjustment to eliminate proportional consolidation		(36	)		(9	)
Restructuring charges — net		1			(2	)
Gains (losses) on disposal of property, plant, and equipment — net		2			—
Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses		(30	)		(59	)
Other corporate costs — net		18			3
Sale transaction fees		—			(32	)
Benefit (provision) for taxes on income (loss)		134			(51	)

Net income (loss)	$	(78	)	$	(161	)

OPERATING SEGMENT RESULTS

North America

The following table presents key financial and operating information for North America for the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in millions, except for shipments, which are in kt).


	Six Months
	Ended
	September 30,
	2008		2007		Change
	Successor		Combined

Shipments (kt):
Rolled products		579		557		3.9	%
Ingot products		23		33		(30.3	)%

Total shipments		602		590		2.0	%

Net sales	$	2,194	$	2,070		6.0	%
Segment Income	$	44	$	88		(50.0	)%

Shipments

Rolled products shipments increased due to increases in demand in canstock, industrial products and other miscellaneous rolled products, partially offset by decreases in demand for light gauge products as a result of a weak demand in construction and transportation industries. Ingot product shipments declined due to lower scrap sales.

Net sales

Net sales increased primarily due to (1) increased volume of rolled products of $102 million and (2) increased average LME prices for metal of $140 million, partially offset by (3) contracts priced in prior periods resulting in lower metal price lag of $86 million and (4) decreased volume and sales in ingot products of $27 million.

Additionally, during the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, we were unable to pass through approximately $152 million and $139 million, respectively, of metal purchase costs due to price ceilings on certain sales contracts resulting in a $13 million unfavorable impact to net sales period over period.

Segment Income

Segment Income was unfavorably impacted by (1) the negative impact of metal price lag of $38 million, (2) increased net foreign currency exchange losses of $11 million and (3) higher operating costs of $34 million primarily associated with energy and freight, partially offset by (4) $16 million due to higher volume of shipments, (5) $4 million as a result of pricing increases, (6) the favorable impact of purchase accounting was $9 million lower during the 2009 year-to-date period and (7) lower stock compensation expense of $11 million recorded in the fiscal 2008 period as a result of the Arrangement.

Europe

The following table presents key financial and operating information for Europe for the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in millions, except for shipments, which are in kt).


	Six Months
	Ended
	September 30,				Percent
	2008		2007		Change
			(Restated)
	Successor		Combined

Shipments (kt):
Rolled products		525		559		(6.1	)%
Ingot products		55		12		358.3	%

Total shipments		580		571		1.6	%

Net sales	$	2,315	$	2,196		5.4	%
Segment Income	$	173	$	143		21.0	%

Shipments

Rolled products shipments decreased due to (1) decreases in demand for specialty, painted and light gauge products from a continued weak building-related products market, (2) decreases in demand for foil stock and (3) decreases in demand for automotive products, partially offset by increases demand for in (4) canstock and (5) lithographic products. Ingot product shipments increased during the six months ended September 30, 2008 as we sold additional ingot to manage inventory levels due to slower business conditions.

Net sales

Net sales increased primarily due to (1) an increase of $110 million from foreign currency exchange gains driven by a strengthened euro against the U.S. dollar, (2) increased volume of ingot products of $99 million,

(3) increased average LME prices for metal of $57 million and (4) increases in conversion premiums of $24 million, partially offset by (5) decreased volume in rolled products of $134 million and (6) unfavorable changes in product mix of $25 million.

Segment Income

Segment Income was favorably impacted by (1) $24 million due to higher pricing, (2) the positive impact of metal price lag of $62 million, (3) the favorable impact of purchase accounting was $10 million higher during the 2009 year-to-date period and (4) lower stock compensation expense of $6 million recorded in the fiscal 2008 period as a result of the Arrangement, partially offset by (5) $19 million from lower volume of shipments, (6) increased net foreign currency exchange losses of $33 million and (7) higher operating costs of $27 million primarily associated with energy.

Asia

The following table presents key financial and operating information for Asia for the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in millions, except for shipments, which are in kt).


	Six Months
	Ended
	September 30,				Percent
	2008		2007		Change
			(Restated)
	Successor		Combined

Shipments (kt):
Rolled products		255		234		9.0	%
Ingot products		11		22		(50.0	)%

Total shipments		266		256		3.9	%

Net sales	$	968	$	899		7.7	%
Segment Income	$	28	$	22		27.3	%

Shipments

Rolled products shipments increased primarily due to increased demand in the can market, partially offset by a decline of shipments in the industrial products and foil stock markets as a result of continued price pressure from Chinese exports, driven by the difference in aluminum metal prices on the Shanghai Futures Exchange and the LME, as well as weakened demand in the electronics sector. Ingot shipments decreased as a result of a labor strike at one of our large customers and the exiting of our foundry business in Korea.

Net sales

Net sales increased primarily due to (1) increases in conversion premiums of $15 million, (2) increased volume of rolled products of $70 million and (3) increased average LME prices for metal of $52 million, partially offset by (4) contracts priced in prior periods resulting in lower metal price lag of $40 million, (5) a decrease of $8 million from net foreign currency exchange losses driven by the continued strengthening of the US. dollar against the Korean won and (6) decreased volume and sales in ingot products of $29 million.

Segment Income

Segment Income was favorably impacted by (1) increased volume of rolled products of $4 million, (2) $16 million due to higher prices, (3) the positive impact of metal price lag of $26 million, (4) the favorable impact of purchase accounting was $9 million higher during the 2009 year-to-date period and (5) lower stock compensation expense of $4 million recorded in the fiscal 2008 period as a result of the Arrangement, partially offset by (6) $41 million in net foreign currency exchange losses as the U.S. dollar strengthened against the Korean won and (7) higher operating costs of $11 million primarily associated with energy.

South America

The following table presents key financial and operating information for South America for the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (in millions, except for shipments, which are in kt).


	Six Months
	Ended
	September 30,				Percent
	2008		2007		Change
	Successor		Combined

Shipments (kt):
Rolled products		177		154		14.9	%
Ingot products		8		14		(42.9	)%

Total shipments		185		168		10.1	%

Net sales	$	595	$	484		22.9	%
Segment Income	$	95	$	86		10.5	%

Shipments

Rolled product shipments increased primarily due to an increase in can shipments driven by strong market demand. Ingot product shipments decreased primarily as a result of lower primary billet production.

Net Sales

Net sales increased primarily due to (1) increased volume of rolled products of $21 million, (2) favorable changes in product mix of rolled products of $80 million and (3) increased average LME prices for metal of $28 million partially offset by (4) decreases in conversion premiums of $9 million and (5) decreased volume and sales in ingot products of $10 million.

Segment Income

Segment Income was favorably impacted by (1) $7 million due to higher volume of rolled products shipments, (2) the positive impact of metal price lag of $18 million, (3) increased benefit of internally supplied metal from our smelter and the recycling of UBC’s of $17 million, (4) the favorable impact of purchase accounting was $9 million higher in the 2009 year-to-date period and (5) lower stock compensation expense of $3 million recorded in the fiscal 2008 period as a result of the Arrangement, partially offset by (6) increased net foreign currency exchange losses of $12 million as the Brazilian real strengthened against the U.S. dollar and (7) higher operating costs of $35 million primarily associated with energy.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As discussed above, the Arrangement created a new basis of accounting. Under GAAP, the condensed consolidated financial statements for the six months ended September 30, 2007 are presented in two distinct periods, as Predecessor and Successor entities are not comparable in all material respects. However, in order to facilitate a discussion of our liquidity and capital resources for the six months ended September 30, 2008 in comparison with the six months ended September 30, 2007, our Predecessor and Successor cash flows are presented herein on a combined basis. The combined cash flows are non-GAAP financial measures and should not be used in isolation or substitution of the Predecessor and Successor cash flows.

Cash Flows

Shown below is a condensed combining schedule of cash flows for periods allocable to the Successor, Predecessor and the combined presentation for the six months ended September 30, 2007 that we use throughout our discussion of Liquidity and Capital Resources (in millions).


	May 16, 2007			April 1, 2007			Six Months
	Through			Through			Ended
	September 30,			May 15,			September 30,
	2007			2007			2007
	(Restated)						(Restated)
	Successor			Predecessor			Combined
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	3		$	(230	)	$	(227	)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures		(57	)		(17	)		(74	)
Proceeds from sales of assets		1			—			1
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates		3			1			4
Proceeds from loans receivable — net — related parties		10			—			10
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments		72			18			90

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		29			2			31

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		92			—			92
Proceeds from issuance of debt		960			150			1,110
Principal repayments		(905	)		(1	)		(906	)
Short-term borrowings — net		(65	)		60			(5	)
Dividends — minority interests		(1	)		(7	)		(8	)
Debt issuance costs		(35	)		(2	)		(37	)
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options		—			1			1

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		46			201			247

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		78			(27	)		51
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in foreign currencies		1			1			2
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period		102			128			128

Cash and cash equivalents — end of period	$	181		$	102		$	181

Operating Activities

Free cash flow (which is a non-GAAP measure) consists of: (a) Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities; (b) less dividends and capital expenditures and (c) plus net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments (which is net of premiums paid to purchase derivative instruments). Dividends include those paid by our less than wholly-owned subsidiaries to their minority shareholders and dividends paid by us to our common shareholder. Management believes that Free cash flow is relevant to investors as it provides a measure of the cash generated internally that is available for debt service and other value creation opportunities. However, Free cash flow does not necessarily represent cash available for discretionary activities, as certain debt service obligations must be funded out of Free cash flow. We believe the line on our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows entitled “Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities” is the most directly comparable measure to Free cash flow. Our method of calculating Free cash flow may not be consistent with that of other companies.

In our discussion of Metal Price Ceilings, we have disclosed that certain customer contracts contain a fixed aluminum (metal) price ceiling beyond which the cost of aluminum cannot be passed through to the customer, unless adjusted. During the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, we were unable to pass through

approximately $152 million and $139 million, respectively, of metal purchase costs associated with sales under these contracts. Net cash provided by operating activities is negatively impacted by the same amounts, adjusted for any timing difference between customer receipts and vendor payments and offset partially by reduced income taxes. Based on a September 30, 2008 aluminum price of $2,395 per tonne, and our estimate of a range of shipment volumes, we estimate that we will be unable to pass through aluminum purchase costs of approximately $74 — $79 million during the remainder of fiscal 2009 and $112 — $121 million in the aggregate thereafter.

As a result of our acquisition by Hindalco, we established reserves totaling $655 million as of May 15, 2007 to record these contracts at fair value. Fair value effectively represents the discounted cash flows of the forecasted metal purchases in excess of the metal price ceilings contained in these contracts. These reserves are being accreted into revenue over the remaining lives of the underlying contracts, and this accretion will not impact future cash flows. As of September 30, 2008, the balance of these reserves is $260 million.

The following table shows the reconciliation from Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities to Free cash flow, the ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and the change between periods (in millions).


	Six Months
	Ended
	September 30,
	2008			2007			Change
				(Restated)
	Successor			Combined

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(390	)	$	(227	)	$	(163	)
Dividends — minority interests		(5	)		(8	)		3
Capital expenditures		(70	)		(74	)		4
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments		94			90			4

Free cash flow	$	(371	)	$	(219	)	$	(152	)

Ending cash and cash equivalents	$	219		$	181		$	38

Our operations consumed cash at a higher rate during the six months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the prior year period. Net cash used in operating activities increased in the six months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended September 30, 2007 as a result of (1) changes in certain components of our working capital (exclusive of the impact of currency translation adjustments), primarily driven by the increase in aluminum prices in the first half of this fiscal year (peaking in July 2008) and the timing of payments made by our customers at March 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, partially offset by (2) our smaller net loss.

During the six months ended September 30, 2007, net cash used in operating activities was unfavorably impacted by one-time costs associated with or triggered by the Arrangement including: (1) $72 million paid in share-based compensation payments, (2) $42 million paid for sale transaction fees and (3) $25 million in bonus payments for the 2006 calendar year and the period from January 1, 2007 through May 15, 2007.

Dividends paid to our minority interests, primarily in our Asia operating segment, were $5 million and $8 million during the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Capital expenditures were slightly higher in the fiscal 2008 period due, in part, to the construction of Novelis Fusion^tm ingot casting lines in our European and Asian segments as well as additional planned maintenance activities, improvements to our Yeongju, Korea hot mill and other ancillary upgrades made in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.

Net proceeds from the settlement of derivative instruments contributed $94 million to Free cash flow in the six months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to $90 million during the six months ended September 30, 2007.

Investing Activities

The following table presents information regarding our Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (in millions).


	Six Months
	Ended
	September 30,
	2008			2007			Change
				(Restated)
	Successor			Combined

Capital expenditures	$	(70	)	$	(74	)	$	4
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment		2			1			1
Changes to investment in and advances to non-consolidated affiliates		13			4			9
Proceeds from loans receivable — net		13			10			3
Net proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments		94			90			4

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	$	52		$	31		$	21

We estimate that our annual capital expenditure requirements for items necessary to maintain comparable production, quality and market position levels (maintenance capital) will be approximately $55 — $75 million, and that total annual capital expenditures will be approximately $100 — $120 million for the remainder of fiscal year 2009.

As discussed above, the majority of our capital expenditures for the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were for projects devoted to product quality, technology, productivity enhancement and increased capacity. Capital expenditures were slightly higher in the fiscal 2008 period due, in part, to the construction of Novelis Fusion^tm ingot casting lines in our European and Asian Segments as well as additional planned maintenance activities, improvements to our Yeongju, Korea hot mill and other ancillary upgrades made in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.

Proceeds from loans receivable — net during both periods are primarily comprised of payments we received related to a loan due from our non-consolidated affiliate, Aluminium Norf GmbH.

Financing Activities

Overview

The following table presents information regarding our Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (in millions).


	Six Months
	Ended
	September 30,
	2008			2007			Change
	Successor			Combined

Proceeds from issuance of common stock	$	—		$	92		$	(92	)
Proceeds from issuance of debt		—			1,110			(1,110	)
Principal repayments		(7	)		(906	)		899
Short-term borrowings — net		263			(5	)		268
Dividends — minority interests		(5	)		(8	)		3
Debt issuance costs		—			(37	)		37
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options		—			1			(1	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	$	251		$	247		$	4

During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we amended our then existing senior secured credit facilities to increase its capacity by $150 million. We used these proceeds to reduce the outstanding balance of our then

existing revolving credit facility, thus increasing our borrowing capacity. This additional capacity, along with $92 million of cash received from the issuance additional shares indirectly to Hindalco, allowed us to fund general working capital requirements and certain costs associated with the Arrangement including the cash settlement of share-based compensation arrangements and lender fees. In July 2007, we refinanced our Senior Secured Credit Facilities, as discussed below.

During the six months ended September 30, 2008, we increased our short-term borrowing under our new revolving credit facility to provide for general working capital requirements.

Dividends paid to our minority interests, primarily in our Asia operating segment, during the six months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were $5 million and $8 million, respectively.

Senior Secured Credit Facilities

On July 6, 2007, we entered into new senior secured credit facilities with a syndicate of lenders led by affiliates of UBS and ABN AMRO (New Credit Facilities) providing for aggregate borrowings of up to $1.76 billion. The New Credit Facilities consist of (1) a $960 million seven-year Term Loan facility (Term Loan facility) and (2) an $800 million five year multi-currency asset-based revolving credit line and letter of credit facility (ABL facility).

We incurred debt issuance costs on our New Credit Facilities totaling $32 million. These fees are included in Other long-term assets — third parties and are being amortized over the life of the related borrowing in Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net using the “effective interest amortization” method for the Term Loan facility and the straight-line method for the ABL facility. The unamortized amount of these costs was $24 million as of September 30, 2008.

Interest Rate Swaps

As of September 30, 2008, approximately 76% of our debt was fixed rate and approximately 24% was variable rate.

Short-Term Borrowings and Letters of Credit

As of September 30, 2008, we had an additional $170 million outstanding under letters of credit in Korea not included in our revolving credit facility. The weighted average interest rate on our total short-term borrowings was 5.6% and 4.12% as of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, respectively.

Liquidity

The largest driver of our liquidity and borrowing availability under our debt facilities is tied to our working capital, which is significantly influenced by the price of aluminum. The LME price for aluminum peaked during the quarter at $3,292 per tonne before subsequently dropping to $2,395 per tonne as of September 30, 2008. The higher average price for aluminum during the quarter negatively impacts our liquidity and working capital in the near term.

Because of the timing of our production and sales cycles, we did not see an immediate working capital benefit of the decreased prices at the end of the quarter. However, we should start to realize positive Free cash flow over the next three months as a result of the recently declining LME price trend. As aluminum prices continue to recover according to the forward curve, our Free cash flow will be negatively impacted in the future due to the contracts we have with metal price ceilings discussed above, as well as the continued carry of additional working capital as a result of the increased price levels. If aluminum prices were to increase further, we would see further reductions in our overall liquidity position.

Our estimated liquidity as of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008 is as follows (in millions).


	As of
	September 30,			March 31,
	2008			2008
	Successor			Successor

Cash and cash equivalents	$	219		$	326
Gross availability under senior secured credit facilities		444			582
Borrowing availability limitation due to fixed charge coverage ratio		(80	)		(69	)

Total estimated liquidity	$	583		$	839

Our estimated liquidity decreased during the six months ended September 30, 2008 primarily as a result of lower cash on hand and the utilization of short-term borrowings under our new ABL facility to fund our working capital requirements. We continue to maintain forfaiting and factoring arrangements in Asia and South America that provide additional liquidity in those segments. Additionally, in our Asian Segment, our ability to access available liquidity is limited by various factors, including restrictions on granting dividends from Korea. As a result, included in cash and cash equivalents above is approximately $57 million that would not be immediately available to us (outside of Korea) due to these restrictions.

The New Credit Facilities include customary affirmative and negative covenants. Under the ABL facility, if our excess availability, as defined under the borrowing, is less than 10% of the borrowing base, we are required to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1 to 1. Our estimated liquidity shown above reflects this financial covenant. As of September 30, 2008, our fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1 to 1. As a result, our available liquidity is limited to 90% of the available borrowing base to avoid potential default of our financial covenants, resulting in a reduction of availability under our ABL facility of $80 million and $69 million as of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, respectively.

As of September 30, 2008, we were at our maximum available borrowing base under our ABL facility. At current prices for aluminum, we believe that our cash on hand, together with cash provided by operations and borrowing availability under our credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our obligations and fund our working capital requirements for the foreseeable future.

For the six months ended September 30, 2008, actual returns for our worldwide funded pension plans were significantly below our expected rate of return of 6.9% due to adverse conditions in the equity markets. Continued actual returns below our expected rate may unfavorably impact the amount and timing of future contributions to funded plans.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

In accordance with SEC rules, the following qualify as off-balance sheet arrangements:


	•	any obligation under certain derivative instruments;

	•	any obligation under certain guarantees or contracts;

	•	a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity or similar entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to that entity for such assets and


	•	any obligation under a material variable interest held by the registrant in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to the registrant, or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with the registrant.

The following discussion addresses the applicable off-balance sheet items for our Company.

Derivative Instruments

As of September 30, 2008, we have derivative financial instruments, as defined by FASB Statement No. 133. See Note 12 — Financial Instruments and Commodity Contracts to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

In conducting our business, we use various derivative and non-derivative instruments to manage the risks arising from fluctuations in exchange rates, interest rates, aluminum prices and energy prices. Such instruments are used for risk management purposes only. We may be exposed to losses in the future if the counterparties to the contracts fail to perform. We are satisfied that the risk of such non-performance is remote, due to our monitoring of credit exposures. All derivative contracts are executed with counterparties that, in our judgment, are creditworthy. Our maximum potential loss may exceed the amount recognized in the accompanying September 30, 2008 condensed consolidated balance sheet.

The current and noncurrent portions of derivative assets are presented on the face of our accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The current and noncurrent portions of derivative liabilities are included in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities and Other long-term liabilities, respectively, in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The fair values of our financial instruments and commodity contracts as of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008 are as follows (in millions):


	As of September 30, 2008
	Assets				Liabilities						Net Fair Value
											Assets/
	Current		Noncurrent		Current			Noncurrent			(Liabilities)

Successor
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Cross-currency swaps	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	(65	)	$	(65	)
Interest rate swaps		—		—		—			(4	)		(4	)
Electricity swap		—		6		—			—			6

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments		—		6		—			(69	)		(63	)

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign exchange forward contracts		43		1		(50	)		(16	)		(22	)
Cross-currency swaps		12		—		(9	)		—			3
Interest rate swaps		—		23		—			—			23
Aluminum forward contracts		126		11		(297	)		(7	)		(167	)
Aluminum options		2		5		(22	)		(7	)		(22	)
Embedded derivative instruments		54		—		—			—			54
Natural gas swaps		—		—		(7	)		—			(7	)

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		237		40		(385	)		(30	)		(138	)

Total derivative fair value	$	237	$	46	$	(385	)	$	(99	)	$	(201	)


	As of March 31, 2008
	Assets				Liabilities						Net Fair Value
											Assets/
	Current		Noncurrent		Current			Noncurrent			(Liabilities)

Successor
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Cross-currency swaps	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	(184	)	$	(184	)
Interest rate swaps		—		—		(3	)		(12	)		(15	)
Electricity swap		3		11		—			—			14

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments		3		11		(3	)		(196	)		(185	)

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign exchange forward contracts		43		4		(112	)		(4	)		(69	)
Cross-currency swaps		19		—		(4	)		(1	)		14
Interest rate swaps		2		2		—			—			4
Aluminum forward contracts		130		4		(9	)		—			125
Aluminum options		1		—		—			—			1
Embedded derivative instruments		—		—		(20	)		—			(20	)
Natural gas swaps		5		—		—			—			5

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		200		10		(145	)		(5	)		60

Total derivative fair value	$	203	$	21	$	(148	)	$	(201	)	$	(125	)

Net Investment Hedges

We use cross-currency swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuating exchange rates arising from our loans to and investments in our European operations. We have designated these as net investment hedges. The effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included in Other comprehensive income (loss). The ineffective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net.

The following table summarizes the amount of gain (loss) we recognized in Other comprehensive income (loss) related to our net investment hedge derivatives (in millions).

Three Months

Six Months

May 16, 2007

April 1, 2007

Ended

Through

September 30,

May 15,

2008

2007

2008

2007

Successor

Predecessor

Cross-currency swaps

$81

$(28)

$120

$(28)

$(8)

Cash Flow Hedges

We own an interest in an electricity swap which we have designated as a cash flow hedge against our exposure to fluctuating electricity prices. The effective portion of gain or loss on the derivative is included in Other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivatives — net in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

expense and amortization of debt issuance costs — net in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

For all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, gains or losses representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net in our current period earnings. If at any time during the life of a cash flow hedge relationship we determine that the relationship is no longer effective, the derivative will be de-designated as a cash flow hedge. This could occur if the underlying hedged exposure is determined to no longer be probable, or if our ongoing assessment of hedge effectiveness determines that the hedge relationship no longer meets the measures we have established at the inception of the hedge. Gains or losses recognized to date in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) would be immediately reclassified into current period earnings, as would any subsequent changes in the fair value of any such derivative.

The following table summarizes the (1) the amount of gain or (loss) recognized in Other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI), (2) the amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from Accumulated OCI into income and (3) the amount of gain or (loss) recognized in income (ineffective portion) related to our cash flow hedge derivatives (in millions).

Three Month Comparison:

Amount of Gain or (Loss)

Recognized in Income on

Recognized in OCI on

Reclassified from Accumulated

Derivative (Ineffective Portion

Derivative

OCI into Income

and Amount Excluded from

(Effective Portion)

Effectiveness Testing)

Three Months

Ended

September 30,

2008

2007

2008

2007

2008

2007

Successor

Electricity swap

(12

)

—

Interest rate swaps

—

Six Month Comparison:

Amount of Gain or (Loss)

Recognized in Income on

Recognized in OCI on

Reclassified from Accumulated

Derivative (Ineffective Portion

Derivative

OCI into Income

and Amount Excluded from

(Effective Portion)

Effectiveness Testing)

Six Months

Ended

September 30,

2008

Successor

Electricity swap

—

)

—

Interest rate swaps

—

Amount of

Gain or (Loss)

Recognized in Income on

Amount of Gain or

Reclassified from

Derivative (Ineffective

(Loss) Recognized

Accumulated

Portion and Amount

in OCI on Derivative

OCI into Income

Excluded from

(Effective Portion)

Effectiveness Testing)

May 16, 2007

April 1, 2007

May 16, 2007

April 1, 2007

May 16, 2007

April 1, 2007

Through

September 30,

May 15,

September 30,

May 15,

September 30,

May 15,

2007

Successor

Predecessor

Successor

Predecessor

Successor

Predecessor

Foreign exchange forward contracts

—

)

—

Electricity swap

—

Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges

We use natural gas swaps to manage our exposure to fluctuating energy prices in North America.

While each of these derivatives is intended to be effective in helping us manage risk, they have not been designated as hedging instruments under FASB Statement No. 133. The change in fair value of these derivatives is included in (Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

The following table summarizes the gains (losses) recognized in current period earnings (in millions).


	Three Months						Six Months			May 16, 2007			April 1, 2007
	Ended						Ended			Through			Through
	September 30,						September 30,			September 30,			May 15,
	2008			2007			2008			2007			2007
	Successor			Successor			Successor			Successor			Predecessor
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
Foreign exchange forward contracts	$	17		$	(4	)	$	7		$	12		$	11
Interest rate swaps		15			(2	)		24			(2	)		(1	)
Aluminum forward contracts		(207	)		(30	)		(191	)		(34	)		9
Aluminum options		(27	)		—			(25	)		1			—
Embedded derivative instruments		53			15			58			12			2
Natural gas swaps		(16	)		(2	)		(9	)		(3	)		1
Cross currency swaps		(25	)		(9	)		8			(6	)		(3	)

Gain (loss) recognized		(190	)		(32	)		(128	)		(20	)		19
Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
Electricity swap		5			2			9			4			1

Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net	$	(185	)	$	(30	)	$	(119	)	$	(16	)	$	20

Guarantees of Indebtedness

We have issued guarantees on behalf of certain of our subsidiaries and non-consolidated affiliates, including:


	•	certain of our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries; and

	•	Aluminium Norf GmbH, which is a fifty percent (50%) owned joint venture that does not meet the requirements for consolidation under FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.

In the case of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness guaranteed is for trade accounts payable to third parties. Some have annual terms subject to renewal while others have no expiration and have termination notice requirements. For our majority-owned subsidiaries, the indebtedness guaranteed is for short-term loan, overdraft and other debt facilities with financial institutions, which are currently scheduled to expire during the first half of fiscal 2009. Neither Novelis Inc. nor any of our subsidiaries or non-consolidated affiliates holds any assets of any third parties as collateral to offset the potential settlement of these guarantees.


	Maximum		Liability
	Potential Future		Carrying
	Payment		Value

Wholly-owned Subsidiaries	$	89	$	63
Aluminium Norf GmbH	$	14	$	—

Other

As part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities (SPEs), which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, we are not involved in any unconsolidated SPE transactions.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

We have future obligations under various contracts relating to debt and interest payments, capital and operating leases, long-term purchase obligations, postretirement benefit plans and uncertain tax positions. During the six months ended September 30, 2008, there were no significant changes to these obligations as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2008.

DIVIDENDS

No dividends have been declared since October 26, 2006. Future dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on, among other things, our financial resources, cash flows generated by our business, our cash requirements, restrictions under the instruments governing our indebtedness, being in compliance with the appropriate indentures and covenants under the instruments that govern our indebtedness that would allow us to legally pay dividends and other relevant factors.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

During the six months ended September 30, 2008, there were no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2008.

RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

The following accounting standards have been adopted by us during the six months ended September 30, 2008.

On April 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (FASB Statement No. 157), as it relates to financial assets and financial liabilities. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delayed our required adoption date of FASB Statement No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis, until April 1, 2009.

Also in February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13, which states that FASB Statement No. 13, Accounting for Leases, and other accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement under FASB Statement No. 13 are excluded from the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157, except for assets and liabilities related to leases assumed in a business combination that are required to be measured at fair value under FASB Statement No. 141 or FASB Statement No. 141 (Revised), Business Combinations. See Note 13 — Fair Value Measurements regarding our adoption of this standard.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

The following new accounting standards have been issued, but have not yet been adopted by us as of September 30, 2008, as adoption is not required until future reporting periods.

acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase, and (iii) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. FASB Statement No. 141(R) also requires acquirers to estimate the acquisition-date fair value of any contingent consideration and to recognize any subsequent changes in the fair value of contingent consideration in earnings. We will be required to apply this new standard prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. FASB Statement No. 141(R) amends certain provisions of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, such that adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of FASB Statement No. 141(R) would also apply the provisions of FASB Statement No. 141(R). Early adoption is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the potential impact that FASB Statement No. 141(R) may have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

We have determined that all other recently issued accounting pronouncements will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, or do not apply to our operations.

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND MARKET DATA

This document contains forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industry in which we operate, and beliefs and assumptions made by our management. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects. Words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,” “estimate” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include, but are not limited to, our expectations with respect to the impact of metal price movements on our financial performance, our metal price ceiling exposure and the effectiveness of our hedging programs and controls. These statements are based on beliefs and assumptions of Novelis’ management, which in turn are based on currently available information. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve assumptions and risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. We do not intend, and we disclaim any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

This document also contains information concerning our markets and products generally, which is forward-looking in nature and is based on a variety of assumptions regarding the ways in which these markets and product categories will develop. These assumptions have been derived from information currently available to us and to the third party industry analysts quoted herein. This information includes, but is not limited to, product shipments and share of production. Actual market results may differ from those predicted. While we do not know what impact any of these differences may have on our business, our results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and the market price of our securities may be materially adversely affected. Factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ from the results expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, among other things:


	•	the level of our indebtedness and our ability to generate cash;

	•	changes in the prices and availability of aluminum (or premiums associated with such prices) or other materials and raw materials we use;

	•	the effect of metal price ceilings in certain of our sales contracts;

	•	the capacity and effectiveness of our metal hedging activities, including our internal used beverage cans (UBC) and smelter hedges;

	•	relationships with, and financial and operating conditions of, our customers, suppliers and our ultimate parent, Hindalco;

	•	fluctuations in the supply of, and prices for, energy in the areas in which we maintain production facilities;

	•	our ability to access financing for future capital requirements;

	•	continuing obligations and other relationships resulting from our spin-off from Alcan;

	•	changes in the relative values of various currencies;

	•	factors affecting our operations, such as litigation, environmental remediation and clean-up costs, labor relations and negotiations, breakdown of equipment and other events;

	•	economic, regulatory and political factors within the countries in which we operate or sell our products, including changes in duties or tariffs;

	•	competition from other aluminum rolled products producers as well as from substitute materials such as steel, glass, plastic and composite materials;

	•	changes in general economic conditions;

	•	our ability to improve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures in the future;


	•	changes in the fair value of derivative instruments;

	•	cyclical demand and pricing within the principal markets for our products as well as seasonality in certain of our customers’ industries;

	•	changes in government regulations, particularly those affecting taxes, environmental, health or safety compliance;

	•	changes in interest rates that have the effect of increasing the amounts we pay under our principal credit agreement and other financing agreements; and

	•	the effect of taxes and changes in tax rates.

The above list of factors is not exhaustive. Some of these and other factors are discussed in more detail under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2008.


Item 3.	*Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk*

We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing business operations, including risks from changes in commodity prices (aluminum, electricity and natural gas), foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates that could impact our results of operations and financial condition.

We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through regular operating and financing activities and derivative financial instruments. We use derivative financial instruments as risk management tools only, and not for speculative purposes. Except where noted, the derivative contracts are marked-to-market and the related gains and losses are included in earnings in the current accounting period.

By their nature, all derivative financial instruments involve risk, including both our credit risk of non- performance and the credit risk of non-performance by counterparties. All derivative contracts are executed with counterparties that, in our judgment, are creditworthy. Our maximum potential loss may exceed the amount recognized in the accompanying September 30, 2008 condensed consolidated balance sheet.

The decision of whether and when to execute derivative instruments, along with the duration of the instrument, can vary from period to period depending on market conditions and the relative costs of the instruments. The duration is always linked to the timing of the underlying exposure, with the connection between the two being regularly monitored.

Commodity Price Risks

We have commodity price risk with respect to purchases of certain raw materials including aluminum, electricity and natural gas.

Aluminum

Most of our business is conducted under a conversion model, which allows us to pass through increases or decreases in the price of aluminum to our customers. Nearly all of our products have a price structure with two components: (i) a pass through aluminum price based on the LME plus local market premiums and (ii) a “conversion premium” based on the conversion cost to produce the rolled product and the competitive market conditions for that product.

In situations where we offer customers fixed prices for future delivery of our products, we may enter into derivative instruments for the metal inputs in order to protect the profit on the conversion of the product. Consequently, the gain or loss resulting from movements in the price of aluminum on these contracts would generally be offset by an equal and opposite impact on the net sales and purchases being hedged.

In addition, sales contracts representing approximately 8% of our total shipments for the six months ended September 30, 2008 provide for a ceiling over which metal prices could not contractually be passed through to a customer, unless adjusted. As a result, we are unable to pass through the complete increase in metal prices for sales under these contracts and this negatively impacts our margins when the metal price is

above the ceiling price. Our exposure to metal price ceilings approximates 8% of our estimated shipments for the remainder of fiscal 2009.

We employ three strategies to mitigate our risk of rising metal prices that we cannot pass through to certain customers due to metal price ceilings. First, we maximize the amount of our internally supplied metal inputs from our smelting, refining and mining operations in Brazil. Second, we rely on the output from our recycling operations which utilize used beverage cans (UBCs). Both of these sources of aluminum supply have historically provided an offsetting benefit to the can ceiling contracts. We refer to these two sources as our internal hedges.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we sold short-term LME futures contracts to reduce the cash flow volatility of fluctuating metal prices associated with metal price lag. We enter into forward metal purchases simultaneous with the contracts that contain fixed metal prices. These forward metal purchases directly hedge the economic risk of future metal price fluctuation associated with these contracts. The positive or negative impact on sales under these contracts has been included in the metal price lag effect described above, without regard to the fixed forward instruments we purchased to offset this risk.

Sensitivities

The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax gain (loss) in the fair values of these derivative instruments as of September 30, 2008, given a 10% increase in the three-month LME price ($ in millions).


	Increase in			Change in
	Rate/Price			Fair Value

Aluminum Forward Contracts		10	%	$	76
Aluminum Options		10	%	$	13

Energy

We use several sources of energy in the manufacture and delivery of our aluminum rolled products. In the six months ended September 30, 2008, natural gas and electricity represented approximately 70% of our energy consumption by cost. We also use fuel oil and transport fuel. The majority of energy usage occurs at our casting centers, at our smelters in South America and during the hot rolling of aluminum. Our cold rolling facilities require relatively less energy.

We purchase our natural gas on the open market, which subjects us to market pricing fluctuations. We seek to stabilize our future exposure to natural gas prices through the use of forward purchase contracts. Natural gas prices in Europe, Asia and South America have historically been more stable than in the United States. As of September 30, 2008, we have a nominal amount of forward purchases outstanding related to natural gas.

A portion of our electricity requirements are purchased pursuant to long-term contracts in the local regions in which we operate. A number of our facilities are located in regions with regulated prices, which affords relatively stable costs. In South America, we own and operate hydroelectric facilities that meet approximately 25% of our total electricity requirements in that segment. Additionally, we have entered into an electricity swap in North America to fix a portion of the cost of our electricity requirements.

We purchase a nominal amount of heating oil forward contracts to hedge against fluctuations in the price of our transport fuel.

Fluctuating energy costs worldwide, due to the changes in supply and international and geopolitical events, expose us to earnings volatility as such changes in such costs cannot immediately be recovered under

existing contracts and sales agreements, and may only be mitigated in future periods under future pricing arrangements.

Sensitivities

The following table presents the estimated potential effect on the fair values of these derivative instruments as of September 30, 2008, given a 10% increase in spot prices for energy contracts ($ in millions).


	Increase in			Change in
	Rate/Price			Fair Value

Electricity		10	%	$	6
Natural Gas		10	%	$	2
Heating Oil		10	%	$	1

Foreign Currency Exchange Risks

Exchange rate movements, particularly the euro, the Canadian dollar, the Brazilian real and the Korean won against the U.S. dollar, have an impact on our operating results. In Europe, where we have predominantly local currency selling prices and operating costs, we benefit as the euro strengthens, but are adversely affected as the euro weakens. In Korea, where we have local currency selling prices for local sales and U.S. dollar denominated selling prices for exports, we benefit slightly as the won weakens, but are adversely affected as the won strengthens, due to a slightly higher percentage of exports compared to local sales. In Canada and Brazil, where we have predominately U.S. dollar selling prices and local currency operating costs, we benefit as the local currencies weaken, but are adversely affected as the local currencies strengthen. Foreign currency contracts may be used to hedge the economic exposures at our foreign operations.

It is our policy to minimize functional currency exposures within each of our key regional operating segments. As such, the majority of our foreign currency exposures are from either forecasted net sales or forecasted purchase commitments in non-functional currencies. Our most significant non-U.S. dollar functional currency operating segments are Europe and Asia, which have the euro and the Korean won as their functional currencies, respectively. South America is U.S. dollar functional with Brazilian real transactional exposure.

We face translation risks related to the changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Amounts invested in our foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the Shareholders’ equity section of the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Net sales and expenses in our foreign operations’ foreign currencies are translated into varying amounts of U.S. dollars, and these changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our net sales and expenses from foreign operations as expressed in U.S. dollars.

Any negative impact of currency movements on the currency contracts that we have entered into to hedge foreign currency commitments to purchase or sell goods and services would be offset by an equal and opposite favorable exchange impact on the commitments being hedged. For a discussion of accounting policies and other information relating to currency contracts, see Note 1 — Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 12 — Financial Instruments and Commodity Contracts to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

Sensitivities

The following table presents the estimated potential effect on the fair values of these derivative instruments as of September 30, 2008, given a 10% increase in rates ($ in millions).


				Pre-Tax
				Gain
	Increase in			(Loss) in
	Exchange Rate			Fair Value

Currency measured against the U.S. dollar
Euro		10	%	$	(39	)
Korean won		10	%	$	(10	)
Brazilian real		10	%	$	18
British pound		10	%	$	8
Canadian dollar		10	%	$	3
Swiss franc		10	%	$	(1	)
Malaysian ringgit		10	%	$	1

Loans to and investments in European operations have been hedged by cross-currency swaps (euro 475 million, GBP 62 million, CHF 35 million). Principal only swaps totaling euro 91 million were accounted for as cash flow hedges through May 15, 2007. Concurrent with the completion of the Arrangement on May 15, 2007, we dedesignated these hedging relationships. On September 1, 2007, we redesignated our cross-currency swaps as net investment hedges. While this has no impact on our cash flows, subsequent changes in the value of currency related derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges are recognized in Gain (loss) on change in fair value of derivative instruments — net in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.

The following table presents the estimated potential pre-tax loss in the fair values of these derivative instruments as of September 30, 2008, assuming a 10% increase in rates ($ in millions).


				Pre-Tax
	Increase in			Loss in
	Rate			Fair Value

Currency measured against the U.S. dollar
Euro		10	%	$	(79	)
British pound		10	%	$	(13	)
Swiss franc		10	%	$	(4	)

Interest Rate Risks

We are subject to interest rate risk related to our floating rate debt. For every 12.5 basis point increase in the interest rates on our outstanding variable rate debt as of September 30, 2008, which includes $348 million of term loan debt and other variable rate debt of $341 million, our annual pre-tax income would be reduced by approximately $1 million.

As of September 30, 2008, approximately 76% of our debt obligations were at fixed rates. Due to the nature of fixed-rate debt, there would be no significant impact on our interest expense or cash flows from either a 10% increase or decrease in market rates of interest.

From time to time, we have used interest rate swaps to manage our debt cost. In Korea, we entered into interest rate swaps to fix the interest rate on various floating rate debt. See Note 8 — Debt to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for further information.

Sensitivities

The following table presents the estimated potential effect on the fair values of these derivative instruments as of September 30, 2008 given a 10% increase in rates ($ in millions).


	Increase in			Change in
	Rate			Fair Value

Interest Rate Swap Contracts
North America		10	%	$	2
Asia		10	%	$	—


Item 4.	*Controls and Procedures*

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and (2) accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, members of management, at the direction (and with the participation) of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of September 30, 2008. Based on that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at a reasonable assurance level as of September 30, 2008, because of the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting discussed below. Notwithstanding the material weakness described below, our management has concluded that the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report are fairly stated, in all material respects, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP).

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Material Weakness Existing as of September 30, 2008 and Remediation Plan

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As of September 30, 2008, we did not maintain effective controls over the application of purchase accounting for an equity method investee including related income tax accounts. Specifically, our controls did not ensure the accuracy of our purchase accounting adjustments for an equity method investee, resulting in an error in our provision for income taxes during the period we were finalizing our purchase accounting. This control deficiency resulted in adjustments affecting the period May, 15, 2007 through March 31, 2008 identified in Note 2 — Restatement of Financial Statements in the consolidated and combined financial statements included in our Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on August 11, 2008 (see Note 2 — Restatement of Financial Statements to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements).

Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a material misstatement of the accounts identified in Note 2 — Restatement of Financial Statements to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements that would result in a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim consolidated

financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, management has determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.

Our plan for remediating this material weakness includes the following:

1. We conducted a full review of the purchase accounting for the Hindalco acquisition, including a review of the valuation approach, as well as the related accounting for equity method investees and related income tax accounts. This review was conducted by the Principal Financial Officer, corporate and regional financial officers, corporate and regional tax personnel, and the company’s external valuation expert.

2. Management is re-evaluating all accounting and financial reporting controls for purchase accounting and equity method investees, including related income tax accounts.

3. Training sessions are being conducted for key financial and tax personnel regarding equity method accounting and related income tax accounting matters.

4. Management is transitioning certain purchase accounting responsibilities to our regional financial personnel, including tax personnel, and developing procedures to monitor the ongoing activity in the regions.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.	*Legal Proceedings*

Reynolds Boat Case. As previously disclosed, we and Alcan were defendants in a case in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, in Tacoma, Washington, case number C04-0175RJB. Plaintiffs were Reynolds Metals Company, Alcoa, Inc. and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA. The case was tried before a jury beginning on May 1, 2006 under implied warranty theories, based on allegations that from 1998 to 2001 we and Alcan sold certain aluminum products that were ultimately used for marine applications and were unsuitable for such applications. The jury reached a verdict on May 22, 2006 against us and Alcan for approximately $60 million, and the court later awarded Reynolds and Alcoa approximately $16 million in prejudgment interest and court costs.

Company, Inc. (collectively CCE) in federal court in Georgia. Novelis intends to defend these claims vigorously.

CCBSS is a consortium of Coca-Cola bottlers across the United States, including Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached an aluminum can stock supply agreement between the parties, and seeks monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial and a declaration of its rights under the agreement. The agreement includes a “most favored nations” provision regarding certain pricing matters. CCBSS alleges that Novelis Corporation breached the terms of the most favored nations provision. The dispute will likely turn on the facts that are presented to the court by the parties and the court’s finding as to how certain provisions of the agreement ought to be interpreted. If CCBSS were to prevail in this litigation, the amount of damages would likely be material. Novelis Corporation has filed its answer and the parties are proceeding with discovery.

ARCO and Novelis are partners in a joint venture rolling mill located in Logan, Kentucky. In the complaint, ARCO seeks to resolve a perceived dispute over management and control of the joint venture following Hindalco’s acquisition of Novelis.


Item 6.	*Exhibits*


Exhibit
No.			Description

	2	.1	Arrangement Agreement by and among Hindalco Industries Limited, AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc., dated as of February 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2007)
	3	.1	Restated Certificate and Articles of Incorporation of Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File No. 001-32312))
	3	.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws, adopted as of July 24, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 8-K filed by Novelis Inc. on July 25, 2008 (File No. 001-32312))
	4	.1	Shareholder Rights Agreement between Novelis and CIBC Mellon Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 10-K filed by Novelis Inc. on March 30, 2005 (File No. 001-32312))
	4	.2	Indenture, relating to the Notes, dated as of February 3, 2005, between the Company, the guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2005 (File No. 001-32312))
	4	.3	Form of Note for 7 1/4% Senior Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form S-4 filed by Novelis Inc. on August 3, 2005 (File No. 331-127139))
	4	.4	First Amendment to the Shareholder Rights Agreement between Novelis Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, dated as of February 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K file on February 13, 2007)
	10	.1*	Employment Agreement dated August 8, 2008 between Novelis Inc. and Alexandre Moreira Martins de Almeida
	31	.1	Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
	31	.2	Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
	32	.1	Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
	32	.2	Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer


*		Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit
No.			Description

	2	.1	Arrangement Agreement by and among Hindalco Industries Limited, AV Aluminum Inc. and Novelis Inc., dated as of February 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2007)
	3	.1	Restated Certificate and Articles of Incorporation of Novelis Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Novelis Inc. on January 7, 2005 (File No. 001-32312))
	3	.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws, adopted as of July 24, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 8-K filed by Novelis Inc. on July 25, 2008 (File No. 001-32312))
	4	.1	Shareholder Rights Agreement between Novelis and CIBC Mellon Trust Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 10-K filed by Novelis Inc. on March 30, 2005 (File No. 001-32312))
	4	.2	Indenture, relating to the Notes, dated as of February 3, 2005, between the Company, the guarantors named on the signature pages thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2005 (File No. 001-32312))
	4	.3	Form of Note for 7 1/4% Senior Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form S-4 filed by Novelis Inc. on August 3, 2005 (File No. 331-127139))
	4	.4	First Amendment to the Shareholder Rights Agreement between Novelis Inc. and CIBC Mellon Trust Company, dated as of February 10, 2007 (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K file on February 13, 2007)
	10	.1*	Employment Agreement dated August 8, 2008 between Novelis Inc. and Alexandre Moreira Martins de Almeida
	31	.1	Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
	31	.2	Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
	32	.1	Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
	32	.2	Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer


*		Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

100


	PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited) Three Months Ended September 30, 2008; Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 (Restated); Six Months Ended September 30, 2008; May 16, 2007 Through September 30, 2007 (Restated); and April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007	2
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) As of September 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008 (Restated)	3
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) Six Months Ended September 30, 2008; May 16, 2007 Through September 30, 2007 (Restated); and April 1, 2007 Through May 15, 2007	4
		Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholder’s Equity (unaudited) Six Months Ended September 30, 2008 (Restated as to opening balance)	6
		Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	7
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	51
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	90
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	94

	PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	96
	Item 6.	Exhibits	98
EX-10.1
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

	1.		STARTING DATE AND DURATION

			The effective date of your assignment is August 1, 2008.

	2.		COMPENSATION

	a.		Position Grade

			Your position will be administered at a salary grade 44. We will review your grade no later than July 1, 2009.

	b.		Base Salary

			Your starting base salary will be R$520,000 per annum (R$520,000 over 13 months). Your salary will be subject to review periodically in accordance with Novelis’ salary administration practices.

	c.		Incentive Plans

	i.		Annual Incentive Plan (AIP)

			You will participate in the Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) with a Target Bonus opportunity of 57% of your base salary effective August 1, 2008. For the period April 1, 2008 through July 31, 2008 your Target Bonus opportunity is 53%.

	ii.		Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)

			You are eligible to participate in the Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) of Novelis Inc. Your current LTIP opportunity is based on a grade 42. Your future LTIP opportunity will be based on your grade at that time.

	3.		BENEFITS

			You and your eligible dependents will continue to be covered by the employee benefit plans in Brazil. You will also be eligible for benefits specific for the position of President Novelis South America [list of benefits attached to this offer letter].