EX-99.1 2 v202648_ex99-1.htm Unassociated Document
 
   Education Realty Trust, Inc. – Investor Presentation
 
    November 2010
 
GrandMarc at the Corner (at UVA)
 
0
 
 
 
 
(1)
 
Owned portfolio Including 3 joint venture communities that are also managed by the Company.
 
Repositioned High Quality Portfolio(1)
 
Currently 44 communities:  over 27,800 beds
 
Repositioned portfolio 35 communities:  over 24,000 beds
 
Excellent Long Term Relationships Should Lead
To Opportunities
 
Solid industry reputation
 
Extensive industry network
 
Over 40 years in student housing industry
 
Few competitors can match size and national footprint
 
Excellent Demographic Trends
 
U. S. enrollment expected to increase 1.5% annually
through 2016
 
External Growth Opportunities
 
ONE PlanSM on-campus developments for own account
 
Off-Campus developments for own account
 
Potential for acquisitions
 
Internal Growth Opportunities
 
Improve performance of current portfolio
 
Capital recycling program
 
University Towers, NC State University
 
The Reserve at Star Pass, University of Arizona
 
Leader in Collegiate Student Housing
 
1
 
 
 
 
Leader in Collegiate Student Housing
 
(1)
 
After repositioning transactions.
 
(2)
 
Includes joint venture properties.
 
Campus Creek, University of Mississippi
 
The Commons, University of Tennessee
 
Solid Capital Structure/Meaningful Capacity for
Growth
(as of September 30, 2010)
 
Debt/Gross Assets                                     43%
 
Interest Coverage Ratio                          2.2x
 
Net Debt to EBITDA                                  7.4x
 
Debt Financing Covered through     2011
 
Acquisition Capacity                                 >$200 million (1)
 
        
 
Profitable Third-Party Fee Businesses
 
Proven third-party development business
 
Awarded over $1.3 billion of new on-campus
developments since 2000
 
Over $330 million in developments currently
under contract or recently awarded
 
Stable third-party management business
 
Multi-year contracts (typically 2-5 years)
 
Supports strategic relationships with universities
 
23 managed properties / over 11,900 beds (2)
 
2
 
 
 
 
Owned/JV Properties
 
Managed Properties
 
EDR is focused on key student housing markets. The strongest enrollment growth is expected in the Southeast and Southwest
regions, with a significant number of EDR’s properties located in these key areas.  Approximately 67% of EDR’s EBITDA is from
properties located in states forecasted to increase enrollment by 1.25% or greater.
 
Market Leadership with Scale in the Student Housing Business
 
< 0.25%
 
0.25% to 1.25%
 
1.25% to 2%
 
> 2%
 
(increase in # of students)
 
High Quality Owned Portfolio
 
Source: Rosen Consulting LLC (March 2009).
 
3
 
 
 
 
High Quality Owned Portfolio
 
Amenity Rich Assets with Geographic and University Diversification
 
Distance to Campus
 
EBITDA by State
 
Portfolio Average Distance to Campus - 1.1 miles.
 
Percentage of Beds having a 1 to 1 Ratio to Baths – 69%.
 
Average Enrollment of Universities served – 29,500.
 
Average Age of Communities – 10 years.
 
Note: Reflects impact of recent transactions
 
4
 
 
 
 
Recent Portfolio Repositioning
 
Pending Dispositions
 
9 communities, including 8 of the former Place
communities
 
$84.8 million sales price and $50.3 million in
net proceeds
 
Average enrollment of universities served
15,500
 
Acquisition of GrandMarc
 
At University of Virginia with enrollment of
24,400
 
Within 2 blocks of campus
 
Four years old
 
Average rental rate $670
 
Total purchase price of $45.5 million
 
Impact on Portfolio
 
Average enrollment of universities served
increases 15% to 29,500
 
5% improvement in average rental rate
 
$33.3 million reduction in mostly variable rate
debt with late 2013 and early 2014 maturities
 
GrandMarc at the Corner, University of Virginia
 
5
 
 
 
 
Supply/Demand Should Lead to Net Operating Income Growth
 
Industry Growth Opportunities
 
Supply
 
Constrained
 
Credit crisis inhibited new construction.
 
Decreased state appropriations limit ability for many universities to update aging and
obsolete on-campus housing.
 
On-Campus housing capacity as a percentage of undergraduate enrollment decreased from
32% in 1990 to 25% in 2004.
 
Demand for Student Housing
 
Increasing Enrollment – 1.5% Annually through 2016
 
Echo Boom generation
 
Increasing percentage of high school graduates choosing to attend college.
 
College students are taking longer to graduate.
 
6
 
 
 
 
External Growth Opportunities
 
The ONE PlanSM:
 
Exclusively designed for on-campus equity
ownership of student apartments
 
Provides EDR with attractive risk / returns due
to “best location”
 
Provides universities with needed new on-
campus housing while preserving capital
 
Increasing acceptance by universities
(Syracuse development and University of
Texas at Austin commencing construction in
2011 for delivery in 2013)
 
The ONE PlanSM - EDR’s On-Campus Equity Program
 
University Village Apartments, Syracuse University
 
7
 
 
 
 
External Growth Opportunities
 
The ONE Plan – Plus
 
Creative structuring similar to The ONE PlanSM
 
Graduate Student Housing at Johns Hopkins – 572 bed,
$61 million development on University owned land
adjacent to campus, commencing construction in 2010
for delivery in 2012
 
EDR provided second mortgage financing collateralized
by a replenishing cash reserve fund.
 
Third party development fees and 10 year management
agreement
 
Off-Campus Developments for Own Account
 
University of Connecticut – 501 bed, $45 million
development adjacent to campus, commencing
construction in 2011 for delivery in 2012 and 2013
 
Pursuing numerous joint ventures with local and regional
developers
 
Potential for Acquisitions
 
Highly fragmented sector, ownership by small local
property owners/operators
 
Industry contacts and network will provide opportunities
 
Sources of acquisitions
 
Overleveraged acquirers
 
Overleveraged local or regional developers
 
Financial institutions
 
Institutions divesting from student housing business
 
Operating business; no “brand” support
 
Ability to move quickly versus lesser capitalized buyers
 
Acquisition capacity after repositioning >$200 million
  
 
Johns Hopkins
 
8
 
 
 
 
Awarded project in July 2010
 
Currently negotiating ground lease
 
$64 million total project cost
 
Approximately 612 beds in 16 story high rise
collegiate community
 
Construction expected to start summer 2011
 
Anticipated opening in summer 2013
 
EDR will own and manage the asset subject to a
ground lease
 
The University of Texas at Austin
 
ONE PlanSM Project at the University of Texas
 
9
 
 
 
 
Entered Development agreement September 2010
 
Two phases of collegiate housing with total cost of
approximately $45 million
 
290 units of studio, one, two and three bedroom
apartments
 
Part of $220 million mixed use town center next to
the University
 
Construction expected to start in 2011
 
Opening of Phase I expected for 2012 and Phase II
in 2013
 
EDR will own and manage the collegiate housing
component of the development
 
The project will establish an urban, community-
focused college town center for UConn and the city
of Mansfield
 
STORRS Center, University of Connecticut
 
Owned Development at the University of Connecticut
 
10
 
 
 
 
Improve Performance of Current Portfolio
 
Reorganized and restructured
 
New Senior Vice President of Operations Christine
Richards
 
Streamlined and refocused operating group
 
Reallocated non operational support functions from
operating group (i.e. capital project management)
 
Improving certain key functions such as corporate
marketing leader
 
Reviewing other processes to drive efficiency and
effectiveness
 
Focused on Technology enhancements
 
Improved lease tracking and monitoring to maximize
not only occupancy but also rate
 
Upgraded property websites
 
Favorable Supply/Demand Characteristics   
in Many Markets
 
11
 
 
 
 
Solid Capital Structure
 
Debt to Gross Assets        43%                      
 
Net Debt to EBITDA          7.4x
 
Interest Coverage Ratio  2.2x
 
Debt Financing Covered through 2011
 
Acquisition Capacity >$200 million
 
Meaningful Capacity for Growth
 
Notes:
 
  Maturity in 2011 relates to a construction loan that has a two year extension option which the Company expects to exercise.
 
   Financial data as of September 30, 2010
 
   Acquisition capacity is after repositioning transactions.
 
Debt Maturities
 
12
 
 
 
 
Near-Term Outlook and 2010 Forecast
 
2010-2011 Lease Term Opening
 
2.3% improvement in occupancy; rates up
approximately 2%
 
Pricing power slightly better than prior year
 
Expect positive leasing for 2011/2012             
 
Developments for Own Account
 
ONE PlanSM on-campus development near the
core of campus at the University of Texas at Austin
 
Off-Campus development adjacent to the
University of Connecticut
 
Third Party Fee Development
 
Credit markets improving
 
Began construction in 2010
 
Johns Hopkins
 
SUNY ESF
 
East Stroudsburg University
 
Mansfield University of Pennsylvania
 
Improved volume of requests for proposals being
received from universities
 
Acquisition Potential
 
$150 million acquisition capacity
 
Recently closed $45.5 million purchase of  
GrandMarc
 
Seeing more volume of opportunities and uptick in
deals closing
 
        
 
The Commons on Kinnear, Ohio State University
 
The Reserve on Perkins, Oklahoma State University
 
13
 
 
 
 
Investment Highlights
 
Repositioned High Quality Portfolio
 
Excellent Long Term Relationships Should Lead To
Opportunities
 
Excellent Demographic Trends
 
External Growth Opportunities
 
ONE PlanSM On-Campus Development for Own Account
 
ONE Plan - Plus On-Campus Development
 
Off-Campus Developments for Own Account
 
Potential for Acquisitions
 
Internal Growth Opportunities
 
Improve Performance of Current Portfolio
 
Reinvigorate Capital Recycling Program
 
Solid Capital Structure / Meaningful Capacity for
Growth
 
Profitable Third-Party Fee Businesses
 
        
 
The Reserve on West 31st, Kansas University
 
14
 
 
 
 
Forward Looking Statements
 
This presentation includes certain statements, estimates and projections provided by EDR’s management with
respect to the anticipated future performance of EDR, including “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. Such statements, estimates and projections reflect various assumptions by EDR’s management
concerning anticipated results and have been included solely for illustrative purposes.
 
Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,”
“may,” “might,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “result,” and similar expressions. No representations are
made as to the accuracy of such statements, estimates or projections, which necessarily involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that, in some ways, are beyond management’s control. Such factors
include the risk factors discussed in the Company’s registration statement on Form S-3, annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, and quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended S
eptember 30,
2010
, each as filed with the SEC. These risk factors include, but are not limited to risks and uncertainties inherent in
the national economy, the real estate industry in general, and in our specific markets; legislative or regulatory
changes including changes to laws governing REITS; our dependence on key personnel; rising insurance rates and
real estate taxes; changes in GAAP; and our continued ability to successfully lease and operate our properties.
Accordingly, actual results may vary materially from the projected results contained herein and you should not rely
on any forward-looking statements made herein or made in connection with this presentation. The Company shall
have no obligation or undertaking to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect any change in
Company expectations or results, or any change in events.
 
15