10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017

OR

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                to               

Commission file number 001-32319

Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Maryland	20-1296886
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
120 Vantis, Suite 350 Aliso Viejo, California	92656
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (949) 330-4000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☒	Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐	Smaller reporting company ☐
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Emerging growth company  ◻

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.   ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

220,463,909 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, as of May 1, 2017

SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.		2
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016	2
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016	3
	Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Equity for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017	4
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016	5
	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	19
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	34
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	34
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	35
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	35
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	35
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	35
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	35
Item 5.	Other Information	35
Item 6.	Exhibits	36
SIGNATURES		37

i

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.Financial Statements

SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	441,830	$	369,537
Restricted cash		64,414		67,923
Accounts receivable, net		50,229		39,337
Inventories		1,252		1,225
Prepaid expenses		13,252		10,489
Assets held for sale, net		—		79,113
Total current assets		570,977		567,624
Investment in hotel properties, net		3,149,472		3,158,219
Deferred financing fees, net		2,087		4,002
Other assets, net		9,945		9,389
Total assets	$	3,732,481	$	3,739,234
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	36,327	$	36,110
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		17,078		24,896
Dividends and distributions payable		14,228		119,847
Other current liabilities		43,786		39,869
Current portion of notes payable, net		8,898		184,929
Liabilities of assets held for sale		—		3,153
Total current liabilities		120,317		408,804
Notes payable, less current portion, net		982,460		746,374
Capital lease obligations, less current portion		15,574		15,574
Other liabilities		36,917		36,650
Total liabilities		1,155,268		1,207,402
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Equity:
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized:
6.95% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 4,600,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, stated at liquidation preference of $25.00 per share		115,000		115,000
6.45% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 3,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, stated at liquidation preference of $25.00 per share		75,000		75,000
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 220,417,417 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and 220,073,140 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016		2,204		2,201
Additional paid in capital		2,594,724		2,596,620
Retained earnings		848,736		786,901
Cumulative dividends and distributions		(1,107,180)		(1,092,952)
Total stockholders’ equity		2,528,484		2,482,770
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint venture		48,729		49,062
Total equity		2,577,213		2,531,832
Total liabilities and equity	$	3,732,481	$	3,739,234

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

2

SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
REVENUES
Room	$	190,367	$	187,297
Food and beverage		75,501		71,234
Other operating		14,875		15,761
Total revenues		280,743		274,292
OPERATING EXPENSES
Room		51,292		51,044
Food and beverage		50,537		51,929
Other operating		3,831		4,056
Advertising and promotion		14,946		14,993
Repairs and maintenance		10,967		11,264
Utilities		7,222		7,514
Franchise costs		8,055		8,096
Property tax, ground lease and insurance		21,287		22,840
Other property-level expenses		34,738		34,713
Corporate overhead		6,779		6,717
Depreciation and amortization		40,807		40,047
Total operating expenses		250,461		253,213
Operating income		30,282		21,079
Interest and other income		721		489
Interest expense		(11,249)		(20,010)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(4)		(105)
Gain on sale of assets		44,285		—
Income before income taxes		64,035		1,453
Income tax provision		(208)		(237)
NET INCOME		63,827		1,216
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest		(1,992)		(1,650)
Preferred stock dividends		(3,207)		(2,766)
INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	58,628	$	(3,200)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	$	63,827	$	1,216
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	58,628	$	(3,200)
Basic and diluted per share amounts:
Basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share	$	0.27	$	(0.02)
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		219,093		212,887
Distributions declared per common share	$	0.05	$	0.05

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY

(In thousands, except share data)

	Preferred Stock															Noncontrolling
	Series E			Series F			Common Stock							Cumulative		Interest in
	Number of			Number of			Number of			Additional		Retained		Dividends and		Consolidated
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Paid in Capital		Earnings		Distributions		Joint Venture		Total
Balance at December 31, 2016 (audited)	4,600,000	$	115,000	3,000,000	$	75,000	220,073,140	$	2,201	$	2,596,620	$	786,901	$	(1,092,952)	$	49,062	$	2,531,832
Deferred stock compensation, net	—		—	—		—	344,277		3		(1,896)		—		—		—		(1,893)
Common stock distributions and distributions payable at $0.05 per share year to date	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		—		(11,021)		—		(11,021)
Series E preferred stock dividends and dividends payable at $0.434375 per share year to date	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		—		(1,998)		—		(1,998)
Series F preferred stock dividends and dividends payable at $0.403125 per share year to date	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		—		(1,209)		—		(1,209)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		—		—		(2,325)		(2,325)
Net income	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		61,835		—		1,992		63,827
Balance at March 31, 2017	4,600,000	$	115,000	3,000,000	$	75,000	220,417,417	$	2,204	$	2,594,724	$	848,736	$	(1,107,180)	$	48,729	$	2,577,213

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	63,827	$	1,216
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Bad debt expense		131		109
Gain on sale of assets, net		(44,570)		(7)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		4		105
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net		(657)		6,402
Depreciation		40,150		39,333
Amortization of franchise fees and other intangibles		819		773
Amortization of deferred financing fees		578		555
Amortization of deferred stock compensation		1,749		1,614
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash		4,013		8,176
Accounts receivable		(10,575)		(14,396)
Inventories		5		39
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(2,387)		(1,729)
Accounts payable and other liabilities		(370)		7,691
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		(8,569)		(6,790)
Net cash provided by operating activities		44,148		43,091
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sales of assets		123,117		7
Restricted cash — replacement reserve		(504)		(309)
Renovations and additions to hotel properties		(29,872)		(48,818)
Payment for interest rate derivative		(19)		—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		92,722		(49,120)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from preferred stock offerings		—		115,000
Payment of preferred stock offering costs		—		(4,016)
Repurchase of common stock for employee withholding obligations		(3,793)		(2,641)
Proceeds from notes payable		240,000		100,000
Payments on notes payable		(178,599)		(117,558)
Payments of deferred financing costs		(13)		(78)
Dividends and distributions paid		(119,847)		(186,301)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest		(2,325)		(775)
Net cash used in financing activities		(64,577)		(96,369)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		72,293		(102,398)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		369,537		499,067
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	441,830	$	396,669
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid for interest	$	9,632	$	12,455
Cash paid for income taxes	$	38	$	204
NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITY
Increase in accounts payable related to renovations and additions to hotel properties and other assets	$	2,119	$	5,844
Amortization of deferred stock compensation — construction activities	$	151	$	239
NONCASH FINANCING ACTIVITY
Issuance of common stock distributions	$	—	$	78,823
Dividends and distributions payable	$	14,228	$	13,592

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Organization and Description of Business

Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Maryland on June 28, 2004 in anticipation of an initial public offering of common stock, which was consummated on October 26, 2004. The Company, through its 100% controlling interest in Sunstone Hotel Partnership, LLC (the “Operating Partnership”), of which the Company is the sole managing member, and the subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, including Sunstone Hotel TRS Lessee, Inc. (the “TRS Lessee”) and its subsidiaries, is currently engaged in acquiring, owning, asset managing and renovating hotel properties. The Company may also sell certain hotel properties from time to time. The Company operates as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes.

As a REIT, certain tax laws limit the amount of “non-qualifying” income the Company can earn, including income derived directly from the operation of hotels. The Company leases all of its hotels to its TRS Lessee, which in turn enters into long-term management agreements with third parties to manage the operations of the Company’s hotels, in transactions that are intended to generate qualifying income. As of March 31, 2017, the Company had interests in 27 hotels (the “27 hotels”), and the Company’s third-party managers included the following:

	Number of Hotels
Subsidiaries of Marriott International, Inc. or Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. (collectively, “Marriott”)	11
Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Inc.	5
Highgate Hotels L.P. and an affiliate	3
Crestline Hotels & Resorts	2
Hilton Worldwide	2
Hyatt Corporation	2
Davidson Hotels & Resorts	1
HEI Hotels & Resorts	1
Total hotels held for investment	27

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, the TRS Lessee and their subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. If the Company determines that it has an interest in a variable interest entity within the meaning of the Consolidation Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), the Company will consolidate the entity when it is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the entity. Based on its review, the Company determined that all of its subsidiaries were properly consolidated as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Noncontrolling interest at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 represents the outside 25.0% equity interest in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront, which the Company includes in its financial statements on a consolidated basis.

The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the Company’s opinion, the interim financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments, consisting solely of normal and recurring adjustments, which are necessary to fairly present the interim financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23, 2017.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of these financial statements.

6

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Earnings Per Share

The Company applies the two-class method when computing its earnings per share. As required by the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC, the net income per share for each class of stock (common stock and convertible preferred stock) is calculated assuming all of the Company’s net income is distributed as dividends to each class of stock based on their contractual rights. To the extent the Company has undistributed earnings in any calendar quarter, the Company will follow the two-class method of computing earnings per share.

The Company follows the requirements of the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are considered participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.

In accordance with the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC, basic earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period, plus potential common shares considered outstanding during the period, as long as the inclusion of such awards is not anti-dilutive. Potential common shares consist of unvested restricted stock awards and the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, using the more dilutive of either the two-class method or the treasury stock method.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Numerator:
Net income	$	63,827	$	1,216
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest		(1,992)		(1,650)
Preferred stock dividends		(3,207)		(2,766)
Distributions paid on unvested restricted stock compensation		(60)		(60)
Undistributed income allocated to unvested restricted stock compensation		(248)		—
Numerator for basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	58,320	$	(3,260)
Denominator:
Weighted average basic and diluted common shares outstanding		219,093		212,887
Basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share	$	0.27	$	(0.02)

The Company’s unvested restricted shares associated with its long-term incentive plan and shares associated with common stock options have been excluded from the above calculation of earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

New Accounting Standards and Accounting Changes

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU No. 2014-09”). The core principle of ASU No. 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity will need to apply a five-step model: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU No. 2014-09 was originally to be effective during the first quarter of 2017; however, the FASB issued a one-year deferral so that it now becomes effective during the first quarter of 2018. ASU No. 2014-09 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.

7

In March 2016, the FASB clarified the principal versus agent guidance in ASU No. 2014-09 with its issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)” (“ASU No. 2016-08”). In particular, ASU No. 2016-08 clarifies how an entity should identify the unit of accounting for the principal versus agent evaluation and how it should apply the control principle to certain types of arrangements, such as service transactions by explaining what a principal controls before the specified good or service is transferred to the customer. In addition, ASU No. 2016-08 reframes the indicators to focus on evidence that an entity is acting as a principal rather than as an agent. ASU No. 2016-08 will become effective, along with ASU No. 2014-09, during the first quarter of 2018. Similar to ASU No. 2014-09, ASU No. 2016-08 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.

In May 2016, the FASB amended ASU No. 2014-09’s guidance on transition, collectability, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes with its issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients” (“ASU No. 2016-12”). The amendments clarify that, for a contract to be considered completed at transition, all (or substantially all) of the revenue must have been recognized under legacy GAAP. This clarification is important because entities that use the modified retrospective transition approach need to apply the standard only to contracts that are not complete as of the date of initial application, and entities that use the full retrospective approach may apply certain practical expedients to completed contracts. In addition, ASU No. 2016-12 clarifies that an entity should consider the probability of collecting substantially all of the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for goods and services expected to be transferred to the customer rather than the total amount promised for all the goods or services in the contract. ASU No. 2016-12 also clarifies that an entity may consider its ability to manage its exposure to credit risk as part of the collectability assessment, as well as that the fair value of noncash consideration should be measured at contract inception when determining the transaction price. Finally, ASU No. 2016-12 allows an entity to make an accounting policy election to exclude from the transaction price certain types of taxes collected from a customer if it discloses that policy. ASU No. 2016-12 will become effective, along with ASU No. 2014-09, during the first quarter of 2018. Similar to ASU No. 2014-09, ASU No. 2016-12 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.

The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2014-09, along with the related clarifications and amendments in ASU No. 2016-08 and ASU No. 2016-12, will have on its recognition of revenue included in its consolidated financial statements. While the Company is still evaluating the impact that the ASUs will have on accounting for the gain recognized upon the sale of a hotel, there is a possibility that the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 will affect the timing of any gain recognition in the consolidated financial statements. For example, under current guidance, a gain on the sale of hotel properties with contingencies and some future involvement is deferred until all contingencies have been removed. Under the new guidance, however, the entire gain on sale may be recognized upon the close of escrow. The Company expects to adopt the new ASUs under the modified retrospective approach.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU No. 2016-02”), which will require lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses in the income statement in a manner similar to today’s accounting. The guidance also eliminates today’s real estate-specific provisions and changes the guidance on sale-leaseback transactions, initial direct costs and lease executory costs for all entities. For lessors, the standard modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. All entities will classify leases to determine how to recognize lease-related revenue and expense. Classification will continue to affect amounts that lessors record on the balance sheet. ASU No. 2016-02 will become effective during the first quarter of 2019, and will require a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements, and, other than the inclusion of operating leases on the Company’s balance sheet, such effects have not yet been determined.

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU No. 2016-13”), which will replace today’s “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized cost. For trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and other instruments, entities will be required to use a new forward looking “expected loss” model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for losses. In addition, entities will have to disclose significantly more information, including information they use to track credit quality by year of origination for most financing receivables. ASU No. 2016-13 will become effective during the first quarter of 2020. ASU No. 2016-13 will require a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted during the first quarter of 2019. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2016-13 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU No. 2016-15”), which clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-15 addresses certain issues where diversity in practice was identified. It amends existing guidance, which is principles based and often requires judgment to determine the appropriate classification of cash flows as operating, investing or financing activities. In addition, ASU No. 2016-15 clarifies how the predominance principle should be applied when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of

8

more than one class of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-15 will become effective during the first quarter of 2018, and will generally require a retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2016-15 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU No. 2016-18”), which will require entities to show the changes in total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. When cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are presented in more than one line item on the balance sheet, the new guidance requires a reconciliation of the totals in the statement of cash flows to the related caption in the balance sheet. This reconciliation can be presented either on the face of the statement of cash flows or in the notes to the financial statements. ASU No. 2016-18 will become effective in the first quarter of 2018, and will require a retrospective approach. Early adoption in an interim period is permitted, but any adjustments must be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes the interim period. Upon adoption of this standard, amounts included in restricted cash on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets will be included with cash and cash equivalents on its consolidated statements of cash flows. These amounts totaled $64.4 million and $67.9 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The adoption of this standard will not change the Company’s balance sheet presentation.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU No. 2017-01”), which changes the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. Under the new guidance, an entity first determines whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. If this threshold is met, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. If it is not met, the entity then evaluates whether the set meets the requirement that a business include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. ASU No. 2017-01 will become effective in the first quarter of 2018, and the guidance is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. Once adopted, the Company will be required to analyze future hotel acquisitions to determine if the transaction qualifies as the purchase of a business or an asset. Transaction costs associated with asset acquisitions will be capitalized, while the same costs associated with a business combination will continue to be expensed as incurred. In addition, asset acquisitions will not be subject to a measurement period, as are business combinations. Depending on the Company’s conclusion, ASU No. 2017-01 may have an effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU No. 2017-04”), which eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill (i.e., Step 2 of today’s goodwill impairment test) to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Under the new guidance, if a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard does not change the guidance on completing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. An entity will still be able to perform today’s optional qualitative goodwill impairment assessment before determining whether to proceed to Step 1. ASU No. 2017-04 will become effective in the first quarter of 2019, and the guidance is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2017-04 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Noncontrolling Interest

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include an entity in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Noncontrolling interest is the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. Such noncontrolling interest is reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity. On the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from the less-than-wholly-owned subsidiary is reported at the consolidated amount, including both the amounts attributable to the Company and the noncontrolling interest. Income or loss is allocated to the noncontrolling interest based on its weighted average ownership percentage for the applicable period. The consolidated statement of equity includes beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for each component of stockholders’ equity, noncontrolling interest and total equity.

At both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the noncontrolling interest reported in the Company’s financial statements included the 25.0% outside ownership in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront.

Segment Reporting

The Company considers each of its hotels to be an operating segment, none of which meets the threshold for a separate reportable segment in accordance with the Segment Reporting Topic of the FASB ASC. Currently, the Company operates in one segment, hotel ownership.

9

3. Investment in Hotel Properties

Investment in hotel properties, net consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Land	$	531,660	$	531,660
Buildings and improvements		3,174,081		3,135,806
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		522,806		512,372
Intangible assets		48,759		49,015
Franchise fees		1,021		1,021
Construction in process		48,856		65,449
Investment in hotel properties, gross		4,327,183		4,295,323
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(1,177,711)		(1,137,104)
Investment in hotel properties, net	$	3,149,472	$	3,158,219

4. Disposals

In February 2017, the Company sold the 444-room Fairmont Newport Beach located in Newport Beach, California for net proceeds of $122.8 million. The Company recognized a net gain on the sale of $44.3 million. The sale did not represent a strategic shift that had a major impact on the Company’s business plan or its primary markets, and therefore, the sale of the hotel did not qualify as a discontinued operation. The Company classified the assets and liabilities of the Fairmont Newport Beach as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2016
Accounts receivable, net	$	452
Inventories		126
Prepaid expenses		386
Investment in hotel property, net		77,971
Other assets, net		178
Assets held for sale, net	$	79,113
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	781
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		751
Other current liabilities		1,473
Other liabilities		148
Liabilities of assets held for sale	$	3,153

The following table provides summary results of operations for the Fairmont Newport Beach, as well as the Sheraton Cerritos that was sold during 2016,  both of which are included in continuing operations (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Revenues	$	3,541	$	11,248
Income before income taxes	$	1,019	$	1,347
Gain on sale of assets	$	44,285	$	—

5. Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the carrying amount of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses were representative of their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.

The Company follows the requirements of the Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Topic of the FASB ASC, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value and disclosing fair value measurements by establishing a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted

10

prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1	Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2	Inputs reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or the liability; or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3	Unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions incorporated in valuation techniques used to determine fair value. These assumptions are required to be consistent with market participant assumptions that are reasonably available.

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the only financial instruments that the Company measures at fair value are its interest rate derivatives, along with a life insurance policy and a related retirement benefit agreement. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company estimates the fair value of its interest rate derivatives using Level 2 measurements based on quotes obtained from the counterparties, which are based upon the consideration that would be required to terminate the agreements. Both the life insurance policy and the related retirement benefit agreement, which are for a former Company associate, are valued using Level 2 measurements.

The following table presents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):

			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
March 31, 2017 (unaudited):
Interest rate cap derivatives	$	4	$	—	$	4	$	—
Interest rate swap derivatives		2,421		—		2,421		—
Life insurance policy (1)		855		—		855		—
Total assets measured at fair value at March 31, 2017	$	3,280	$	—	$	3,280	$	—
December 31, 2016:
Interest rate cap derivative	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Interest rate swap derivatives		1,749		—		1,749		—
Life insurance policy (1)		861		—		861		—
Total assets measured at fair value at December 31, 2016	$	2,610	$	—	$	2,610	$	—

(1) Includes the split life insurance policy for a former Company associate. These amounts are included in other assets, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, and will be used to reimburse the Company for payments made to the former associate from the related retirement benefit agreement, which is included in accrued payroll and employee benefits on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The following table presents the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):

			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
March 31, 2017 (unaudited):
Retirement benefit agreement (1)	$	855	$	—	$	855	$	—
Total liabilities measured at fair value at March 31, 2017	$	855	$	—	$	855	$	—
December 31, 2016:
Retirement benefit agreement (1)	$	861	$	—	$	861	$	—
Total liabilities measured at fair value at December 31, 2016	$	861	$	—	$	861	$	—

(1) Includes the retirement benefit agreement for a former Company associate. The agreement calls for the balance of the retirement benefit to be paid out to the former associate in ten annual installments, beginning in 2011. As such, the Company has paid the former associate a total of $1.2 million through March 31, 2017, which was reimbursed to the Company using funds from the related split life insurance policy noted above. These amounts are included in accrued payroll and employee benefits on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

11

Interest Rate Derivatives

The Company’s interest rate derivatives, which are not designated as effective cash flow hedges, consisted of the following at March 31, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):

									Estimated Fair Value Asset
		Strike / Capped			Effective	Maturity	Notional		March 31,		December 31,
Hedged Debt	Type	Rate		Index	Date	Date	Amount		2017		2016
Hilton San Diego Bayfront (1)	Cap	4.250	%	1-Month LIBOR	April 15, 2015	May 1, 2017	$	110,772	$	—	$	—
Hilton San Diego Bayfront (1)	Cap	4.250	%	1-Month LIBOR	May 1, 2017	May 1, 2019	$	N/A		4		—
$85.0 million term loan (2)	Swap	3.391	%	1-Month LIBOR	October 29, 2015	September 2, 2022	$	85,000		1,610		1,336
$100.0 million term loan (3)	Swap	3.653	%	1-Month LIBOR	January 29, 2016	January 31, 2023	$	100,000		811		413
									$	2,425	$	1,749

(1) In March 2017, the Company purchased a new interest rate cap agreement for $19,000 related to the loan secured by the Hilton San Diego Bayfront. The new agreement, whose terms are substantially the same as the terms under the old cap agreement, will effectively replace the old agreement on May 1, 2017. The fair values of both Hilton San Diego Bayfront cap agreements are included in other assets, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

(2) The fair value of the $85.0 million term loan swap agreement is included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The 1-month LIBOR rate was swapped to a fixed rate of 1.591%.

(3) The fair value of the $100.0 million term loan swap agreement is included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The 1-month LIBOR rate was swapped to a fixed rate of 1.853%.

Noncash changes in the fair values of the Company’s interest rate derivatives resulted in (decreases) increases to interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net	$	(657)	$	6,402

Fair Value of Debt

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,  77.8% and 76.2%, respectively, of the Company’s outstanding debt had fixed interest rates, including the effects of interest rate swap agreements. The Company’s principal value of its consolidated debt totaled $1.0 billion and $0.9 billion as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Using Level 3 measurements, the Company estimates that the fair market value of its debt totaled $1.0 billion and $0.9 billion as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

6. Other Assets

Other assets, net consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Property and equipment, net	$	699	$	779
Goodwill		990		990
Deferred expense on straight-lined third-party tenant leases		2,853		2,876
Interest rate derivatives		2,425		1,749
Other receivables		1,491		1,673
Other		1,487		1,322
Total other assets net	$	9,945	$	9,389

The property and equipment, net noted above consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Cost basis	$	10,843	$	10,807
Accumulated depreciation		(10,144)		(10,028)
Property and equipment, net	$	699	$	779

12

7. Notes Payable

Notes payable consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Notes payable requiring payments of interest and principal, with fixed rates ranging from 4.12% to 5.95%; maturing at dates ranging from November 2020 through January 2025. The notes are collateralized by first deeds of trust on four hotel properties at March 31, 2017, and five hotel properties at December 31, 2016.	$	350,802	$	528,604
Note payable requiring payments of interest and principal, bearing a blended rate of one-month LIBOR plus 225 basis points; maturing in August 2019. The note is collateralized by a first deed of trust on one hotel property.		221,544		222,340
Unsecured term loan requiring payments of interest only, with a blended interest rate based on a pricing grid with a range of 180 to 255 basis points over LIBOR, depending on the Company's leverage ratios. LIBOR has been swapped to a fixed rate of 1.591%, resulting in an effective interest rate of 3.391% based on the Company's current leverage. Matures in September 2022.		85,000		85,000
Unsecured term loan requiring payments of interest only, with a blended interest rate based on a pricing grid with a range of 180 to 255 basis points over LIBOR, depending on the Company's leverage ratios. LIBOR has been swapped to a fixed rate of 1.853%, resulting in an effective interest rate of 3.653% based on the Company's current leverage. Matures in January 2023.		100,000		100,000
Unsecured Series A Senior Notes requiring semi-annual payments of interest only, bearing interest at 4.69%; maturing in January 2026.		120,000		—
Unsecured Series B Senior Notes requiring semi-annual payments of interest only, bearing interest at 4.79%; maturing in January 2028.		120,000		—
Total notes payable	$	997,346	$	935,944
Current portion of notes payable	$	10,167	$	186,034
Less: current portion of deferred financing fees		(1,269)		(1,105)
Carrying value of current portion of notes payable	$	8,898	$	184,929
Notes payable, less current portion	$	987,179	$	749,910
Less: long-term portion of deferred financing fees		(4,719)		(3,536)
Carrying value of notes payable, less current portion	$	982,460	$	746,374

Notes Payable Transactions - 2017

In January 2017, the Company received proceeds of $240.0 million in a  private placement of senior unsecured notes. The private placement consisted of $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.69%, maturing in January 2026 (the “Series A Senior Notes”), and $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.79%, maturing in January 2028 (the “Series B Senior Notes”, together the “Senior Notes”).

In January 2017, the Company used proceeds received from the Senior Notes to repay the loan secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf, which had a balance of $176.0 million and an interest rate of 5.58%. The Marriott Boston Long Wharf loan was scheduled to mature in April 2017, and was available to be repaid without penalty in January 2017.

Interest Expense

Total interest incurred and expensed on the notes payable was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations	$	11,328	$	13,053
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net		(657)		6,402
Amortization of deferred financing fees		578		555
Total interest expense	$	11,249	$	20,010

13

8. Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities

Other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Property, sales and use taxes payable	$	16,436	$	16,965
Income tax payable		382		211
Accrued interest		3,568		1,996
Advance deposits		17,820		14,505
Management fees payable		1,140		1,645
Other		4,440		4,547
Total other current liabilities	$	43,786	$	39,869

Other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Deferred gain on sale of asset	$	7,000	$	7,000
Deferred revenue		6,149		6,045
Deferred rent		19,748		19,807
Deferred incentive management fees		201		—
Other		3,819		3,798
Total other liabilities	$	36,917	$	36,650

9. Stockholders’ Equity

Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

In March 2016, the Company issued 4,600,000 shares of its 6.95% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series E preferred stock”) with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share for gross proceeds of $115.0 million. In conjunction with the offering, the Company incurred $4.0 million in preferred offering costs. On or after March 11, 2021, the Series E preferred stock will be redeemable at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends up to, but not including, the redemption date.

Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

In May 2016, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of its 6.45% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series F preferred stock) with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share for gross proceeds of $75.0 million. In conjunction with the offering, the Company incurred $2.6 million in preferred offering costs. On or after May 17, 2021, the Series F preferred stock will be redeemable at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends up to, but not including, the redemption date.

Common Stock

In February 2017, the Company entered into separate “At the Market” Agreements (the “ATM Agreements”) with each of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated,  J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.  In accordance with the terms of the ATM Agreements, the Company may from time to time offer and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $300.0 million. The Company did not issue any shares of its common stock in connection with the ATM Agreements during the three months ended March 31, 2017. As of March 31, 2017, the Company has $300.0 million available for sale under the ATM Agreements.

In February 2017, the Company’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase plan to acquire up to $300.0 million of the Company’s common and preferred stock. As of March 31, 2017, no shares of either the Company’s common or preferred stock have been repurchased. Future purchases will depend on various factors, including the Company’s capital needs, as well as the Company’s common and preferred stock price.

14

10. Long-Term Incentive Plan

Stock Grants

Restricted shares granted pursuant to the Company’s 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 1, 2014, generally vest over periods from three to five years from the date of grant.

Compensation expense related to awards of restricted shares are measured at fair value on the date of grant and amortized over the relevant requisite service period or derived service period.

In accordance with the Compensation Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur.  The Company’s amortization expense and forfeitures related to restricted shares for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Amortization expense, including forfeitures	$	1,749	$	1,614

In addition, the Company capitalizes compensation costs related to all restricted shares granted to certain employees who work on the design and construction of its hotels. During both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, these capitalized costs totaled $0.2 million. 

Stock Options

In April 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s board of directors approved a grant of 200,000 non-qualified stock options (the “Options”) to one of the Company’s former associates. The Options fully vested in April 2009, and will expire in April 2018. The exercise price of the Options is $17.71 per share.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Management Agreements

Management agreements with the Company’s third-party hotel managers require the Company to pay between 1.75% and 3.5% of total revenue of the managed hotels to the third-party managers each month as a basic management fee. In addition to basic management fees, provided that certain operating thresholds are met, the Company may also be required to pay incentive management fees to certain of its third-party managers. Total basic management fees, net of key money incentives received from third-party hotel managers, along with incentive management fees incurred by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were included in other property-level expenses on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Basic management fees	$	7,895	$	7,667
Incentive management fees		2,553		1,704
Total basic and incentive management fees	$	10,448	$	9,371

License and Franchise Agreements

The Company has entered into license and franchise agreements related to certain of its hotel properties. The license and franchise agreements require the Company to, among other things, pay monthly fees that are calculated based on specified percentages of certain revenues. The license and franchise agreements generally contain specific standards for, and restrictions and limitations on, the operation and maintenance of the hotels which are established by the franchisors to maintain uniformity in the system created by each such franchisor. Such standards generally regulate the appearance of the hotel, quality and type of goods and services offered, signage and protection of trademarks. Compliance with such standards may from time to time require the Company to make significant expenditures for capital improvements.

15

Total license and franchise fees incurred by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were included in franchise costs on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Franchise assessments (1)	$	5,927	$	5,813
Franchise royalties		2,128		2,283
Total franchise costs	$	8,055	$	8,096

(1) Includes advertising, reservation and frequent guest club assessments.

Renovation and Construction Commitments

At March 31, 2017, the Company had various contracts outstanding with third parties in connection with the renovation and repositioning of certain of its hotel properties. The remaining commitments under these contracts at March 31, 2017 totaled $46.1 million.

Capital Leases

The Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile is subject to a building lease which expires in December 2097. Upon acquisition of the hotel in June 2012, the Company evaluated the terms of the lease agreement and determined the lease to be a capital lease pursuant to the Leases Topic of the FASB ASC.

The capital lease asset was included in investment in hotel properties, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as follows (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Gross capital lease asset - buildings and improvements	$	58,799	$	58,799
Accumulated depreciation		(7,105)		(6,738)
Net capital lease asset - buildings and improvements	$	51,694	$	52,061

Future minimum lease payments under the Company’s capital lease together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of March 31, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):

2017	$	1,403
2018		1,403
2019		1,403
2020		1,403
2021		1,403
Thereafter		106,257
Total minimum lease payments (1)		113,272
Less: Amount representing interest (2)		(97,697)
Present value of net minimum lease payments (3)	$	15,575

(1) Minimum lease payments do not include percentage rent which may be paid under the Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile building lease on the basis of 4.0% of the hotel’s gross room revenues over a certain threshold. No percentage rent was due during either the three months ended March 31, 2017 or 2016.  

(2) Interest includes the amount necessary to reduce net minimum lease payments to present value calculated at the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at lease inception.

(3) The present value of net minimum lease payments are presented on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2017 as a current obligation of $1,000, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses, and as a long-term obligation of $15.6 million, which is included in capital lease obligations, less current portion.

Ground, Building and Air Leases

Total rent expense incurred pursuant to ground, building and air lease agreements for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was included in property tax, ground lease and insurance on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):

16

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Minimum rent, including straight-line adjustments	$	2,340	$	2,396
Percentage rent (1)		1,585		2,060
Total	$	3,925	$	4,456

(1) Several of the Company’s hotels pay percentage rent, which is calculated on operating revenues above certain thresholds.

Rent expense incurred pursuant to a  lease on the corporate facility totaled $0.1 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, and is included in corporate overhead expense.

Concentration of Risk

The concentration of the Company’s hotels in California, Illinois, Massachusetts and the greater Washington DC area exposes the Company’s business to economic conditions, competition and real and personal property tax rates unique to these locales. As of March 31, 2017,  16 of the Company’s 27 hotels were concentrated in California, Illinois, Massachusetts and the greater Washington DC area as follows:

							Greater
							Washington DC
	California		Illinois		Massachusetts		Area
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Number of hotels	7		3		3		3
Percentage of total rooms	29	%	9	%	15	%	14	%
Percentage of total consolidated revenue during the past 12 months	34	%	7	%	15	%	14	%

Other

The Company has provided customary unsecured environmental indemnities to certain lenders. The Company has performed due diligence on the potential environmental risks, including obtaining an independent environmental review from outside environmental consultants. These indemnities obligate the Company to reimburse the indemnified parties for damages related to certain environmental matters. There is no term or damage limitation on these indemnities; however, if an environmental matter arises, the Company could have recourse against other previous owners or a claim against its environmental insurance policies.

At March 31, 2017, the Company had $0.5 million of outstanding irrevocable letters of credit to guaranty the Company’s financial obligations related to workers’ compensation insurance programs from prior policy years. The beneficiaries of these letters of credit may draw upon these letters of credit in the event of a contractual default by the Company relating to each respective obligation. No draws have been made through March 31, 2017.

The Company is subject to various claims, lawsuits and legal proceedings, including routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, regarding the operation of its hotels and Company matters. While it is not possible to ascertain the ultimate outcome of such matters, the Company believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts covered by insurance will not have a material adverse impact on its financial condition or results of operations. The outcome of claims, lawsuits and legal proceedings brought against the Company, however, is subject to significant uncertainties.

17

Cautionary Statement

This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and includes this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe the Company’s future plans, strategies, opinions and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “project,” or similar expressions. You should not rely on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are, in some cases, beyond the Company’s control, and which could materially affect actual results, performances or achievements. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the Company’s expectations will be realized. In evaluating these statements, you should specifically consider the risks outlined in detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23, 2017, under the caption “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including but not limited to the following factors:

· general economic and business conditions, including a U.S. recession, changes in the European Union or global economic slowdown, which may diminish the desire for leisure travel or the need for business travel, as well as any type of flu or disease-related pandemic, affecting the lodging and travel industry, internationally, nationally and locally;

· our need to operate as a REIT and comply with other applicable laws and regulations, including new laws, interpretations or court decisions that may change the federal tax laws or the federal income tax consequences of our qualification as a REIT;

· rising hotel operating expenses, including the impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or its potential replacement, increases in minimum wages, changes in work rules or additional costs incurred from new or re-negotiated labor contracts;

· relationships with, and the requirements and reputation of, our franchisors and hotel brands;

· relationships with, and the requirements, performance and reputation of, the managers of our hotels;

· the ground, building or air leases for six of the 27 hotels held for investment as of March 31, 2017;

· competition for the acquisition of hotels, and our ability to complete acquisitions and dispositions;

· performance of hotels after they are acquired;

· new hotel supply, or alternative lodging options such as timeshare, vacation rentals or sharing services such as Airbnb, in our markets, which could harm our occupancy levels and revenue at our hotels;

· competition from hotels not owned by us;

· the need for renovations, repositionings and other capital expenditures for our hotels;

· the impact, including any delays, of renovations and repositionings on hotel operations;

· changes in our business strategy or acquisition or disposition plans;

· our level of debt, including secured, unsecured, fixed and variable rate debt;

· financial and other covenants in our debt and preferred stock;

· our hotels and related goodwill may become impaired, or our hotels and related goodwill which have previously become impaired may become further impaired, in the future, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations;

· volatility in the capital markets and the effect on lodging demand or our ability to obtain capital on favorable terms or at all;

· potential adverse tax consequences in the event that our operating leases with our taxable REIT subsidiaries are not held to have been made on an arm’s-length basis;

· system security risks, data protection breaches, cyber-attacks, including those impacting our hotel managers or other third parties, and systems integration issues; and

· other events beyond our control, including terrorist attacks or civil unrest.

These factors may cause our actual events to differ materially from the expectations expressed or implied by any forward-looking statement. Except as otherwise required by federal securities laws, the Company disclaims any obligations or undertaking to publicly release any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein (or elsewhere) to reflect any change in the Company’s expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

18

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the “Company,” “we” or “us”) is a Maryland corporation. We operate as a self-managed and self-administered real estate investment trust (“REIT”). A REIT is a corporation that directly or indirectly owns real estate assets and has elected to be taxable as a real estate investment trust. To qualify for taxation as a REIT, the REIT must meet certain requirements, including regarding the composition of its assets and the sources of its income. REITs generally are not subject to federal income taxes at the corporate level as long as they pay stockholder dividends equivalent to 100% of their taxable income. REITs are required to distribute to stockholders at least 90% of their REIT taxable income. We own, directly or indirectly, 100% of the interests of Sunstone Hotel Partnership, LLC (the “Operating Partnership”), which is the entity that directly or indirectly owns our hotel properties. We also own 100% of the interests of our taxable REIT subsidiary, Sunstone Hotel TRS Lessee, Inc., which, directly or indirectly, leases all of our hotels from the Operating Partnership, and engages independent third-parties to manage our hotels.

We own primarily urban and resort upper upscale hotels in the United States. As of March 31, 2017, we had interests in 27 hotels (the “27 hotels”). Of the 27 hotels, we classify 24 as upper upscale, two as upscale and one as luxury as defined by Smith Travel Research, Inc. All but one (the Boston Park Plaza) of our 27 hotels are operated under nationally recognized brands such as Marriott, Hilton and Hyatt, which are among the most respected and widely recognized brands in the lodging industry. We believe the largest and most stable segment of travelers prefer the consistent service and quality associated with nationally recognized brands and well-known independent hotels.

We seek to own hotels primarily in urban and resort locations that benefit from significant barriers to entry by competitors and diverse economic drivers. As of March 31, 2017, the hotels comprising our 27 hotel portfolio average 490 rooms in size.

Our mission is to create meaningful value for our stockholders by producing superior long-term returns through the ownership of long-term relevant lodging real estate. Our values include transparency, trust, ethical conduct, honest communication and discipline. As demand for lodging generally fluctuates with the overall economy, we seek to own hotels that will maintain a high appeal with travelers over long periods of time and will generate economic earnings materially in excess of recurring capital requirements. Our strategy over the next several years is to maximize stockholder value through focused asset management and disciplined capital recycling, which is likely to include selective acquisitions and dispositions, while maintaining balance sheet flexibility and strength. Our goal is to maintain low leverage and high financial flexibility to position the Company to create value throughout all phases of the operating and financial cycles.

2017 Year-To-Date Highlights

In January 2017, we received proceeds of $240.0 million in a  private placement of senior unsecured notes. The private placement consisted of $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.69%, maturing in January 2026 (the “Series A Senior Notes”), and $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.79%, maturing in January 2028 (the “Series B Senior Notes”, together the “Senior Notes”).

In January 2017, we used proceeds received from the Senior Notes to repay the loan secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf, which had a balance of $176.0 million and an interest rate of 5.58%. The Marriott Boston Long Wharf loan was scheduled to mature in April 2017, and was available to be repaid without penalty in January 2017.

In February 2017, we sold the 444-room Fairmont Newport Beach, California for net proceeds of $122.8 million, and recognized a net gain on the sale of $44.3 million. The sale did not represent a strategic shift that had a major impact on our business plan or our primary markets, and, therefore, did not qualify as a discontinued operation.

In February 2017,  we entered into separate “At the Market” Agreements (the “ATM Agreements”) with each of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. In accordance with the terms of the ATM Agreements, we may from time to time offer and sell our shares of common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $300.0 million. As of March 31, 2017, we have not sold any shares under the ATM Agreements.

In February 2017, our board of directors authorized a share repurchase plan to acquire up to $300.0 million of our common and preferred stock. As of March 31, 2017, no shares of either our common or preferred stock have been repurchased. Future purchases will depend on various factors, including our capital needs, as well as our common and preferred stock price.

Operating Activities

Revenues. Substantially all of our revenues are derived from the operation of our hotels. Specifically, our revenues consist of the following:

19

· Room revenue, which is the product of the number of rooms sold and the average daily room rate, or  “ADR”, as defined below;

· Food and beverage revenue, which is comprised of revenue realized in the hotel food and beverage outlets as well as banquet and catering events; and

· Other operating revenue, which includes ancillary hotel revenue and other items primarily driven by occupancy such as telephone/internet, parking, spa, resort and other facility fees, entertainment and other guest services. Additionally, this category includes, among other things, attrition revenue, tenant revenue derived from hotel space leased by third parties and any performance guarantee payments.

Expenses. Our expenses consist of the following:

· Room expense, which is primarily driven by occupancy and, therefore, has a significant correlation with room revenue;

· Food and beverage expense, which is primarily driven by food and beverage sales and banquet and catering bookings and, therefore, has a significant correlation with food and beverage revenue;

· Other operating expense, which includes the corresponding expense of other operating revenue, advertising and promotion, repairs and maintenance, utilities, and franchise costs;

· Property tax, ground lease and insurance expense, which includes the expenses associated with property tax, ground lease and insurance payments, each of which is primarily a fixed expense, however property tax is subject to regular revaluations based on the specific tax regulations and practices of each municipality;

· Other property-level expenses, which includes our property-level general and administrative expenses, such as payroll and related costs, contract and professional fees, credit and collection expenses, employee recruitment, relocation and training expenses, management fees and other costs;

· Corporate overhead expense, which includes our corporate-level expenses, such as payroll and related costs, amortization of deferred stock compensation, business acquisition and due diligence costs, legal expenses, contract and professional fees, entity-level state franchise and minimum taxes, travel expenses, office rent and other costs; and

· Depreciation and amortization expense, which includes depreciation on our hotel buildings, improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment, along with amortization on our franchise fees and certain intangibles. Additionally, this category includes depreciation and amortization related to furniture, fixtures and equipment (“FF&E”) for our corporate office.

Other Revenue and Expense. Other revenue and expense consists of the following:

· Interest and other income, which includes interest we have earned on our restricted and unrestricted cash accounts, as well as any energy or other rebates we have received, any miscellaneous income or any gains or losses we have recognized on sales or redemptions of assets other than real estate investments;

· Interest expense, which includes interest expense incurred on our outstanding fixed and variable rate debt and capital lease obligation, gains or losses on derivatives, amortization of deferred financing fees, and any loan fees incurred on our debt;

· Loss on extinguishment of debt, which includes losses recognized on amendments or early repayments of mortgages or other debt obligations from the accelerated amortization of deferred financing fees, along with any costs incurred;

· Gain on sale of assets, which includes the gain we recognized on our sale of the Fairmont Newport Beach in February 2017, as the sale did not qualify as a discontinued operation;

· Income tax provision, which includes federal and state income taxes related to continuing operations charged to the Company net of any refunds received, and any adjustments to unrecognized tax positions, along with any related interest and penalties incurred;

· Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest, which includes net income attributable to the outside 25.0% interest in the joint venture that owns the Hilton San Diego Bayfront; and

· Preferred stock dividends, which includes dividends accrued on our Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series D preferred stock”) until its redemption in April 2016, as well as dividends accrued on our Series E preferred stock and our Series F preferred stock, both of which were issued in 2016.

20

Operating Performance Indicators. The following performance indicators are commonly used in the hotel industry:

· Occupancy, which is the quotient of total rooms sold divided by total rooms available;

· Average daily room rate, or ADR, which is the quotient of room revenue divided by total rooms sold;

· Revenue per available room, or RevPAR, which is the product of occupancy and ADR, and does not include food and beverage revenue, or other operating revenue;

· Comparable RevPAR, which we define as the RevPAR generated by hotels we owned as of the end of the reporting period, but excluding those hotels that we classified as held for sale, those hotels that are undergoing a material renovation or repositioning and those hotels whose room counts have materially changed during either the current or prior year. For hotels that were not owned for the entirety of the comparison periods, comparable RevPAR is calculated using RevPAR generated during periods of prior ownership. We refer to this subset of our hotels used to calculate comparable RevPAR as our “Comparable Portfolio.” Currently, our Comparable Portfolio includes all of the 27 hotels;

· RevPAR index, which is the quotient of a hotel’s RevPAR divided by the average RevPAR of its competitors, multiplied by 100. A RevPAR index in excess of 100 indicates a hotel is achieving higher RevPAR than the average of its competitors. In addition to absolute RevPAR index, we monitor changes in RevPAR index;

· EBITDA, which is net income (loss), excluding: noncontrolling interests; interest expense; benefit or provision for income taxes, including income taxes applicable to the sale of assets; and depreciation and amortization;

· Adjusted EBITDA, which is EBITDA adjusted to exclude: amortization of deferred stock compensation; the impact of any gain or loss from asset sales; impairment charges; prior year property tax assessments or credits; and any other non-recurring identified adjustments;

· Funds from operations (“FFO”) attributable to common stockholders, which is net income (loss), excluding: preferred stock dividends and any redemption charges; noncontrolling interests; gains and losses from sales of property; real estate-related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs); and real estate-related impairment losses; and

· Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders, which is FFO attributable to common stockholders adjusted to exclude: penalties; written-off deferred financing costs; non-real estate-related impairment losses; income tax benefits or provisions associated with the application of net operating loss carryforwards and uncertain tax positions; and any other non-recurring identified adjustments.

Factors Affecting Our Operating Results. The primary factors affecting our operating results include overall demand for hotel rooms, the pace of new hotel development, or supply, and the relative performance of our operators in increasing revenue and controlling hotel operating expenses.

· Demand. The demand for lodging generally fluctuates with the overall economy. In aggregate, demand for our hotels has improved each year since 2010. In 2016, Comparable Portfolio RevPAR, which was affected by significant repositionings at both the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort, increased 0.9% as compared to 2015, with a 20 basis point decrease in occupancy. With these two significant repositionings complete, our first quarter Comparable Portfolio RevPAR increased 5.5% in 2017 as compared to the first quarter of 2016, with a 10 basis point decrease in occupancy.

· Supply. The addition of new competitive hotels affects the ability of existing hotels to absorb demand for lodging and, therefore, impacts the ability to drive RevPAR and profits. The development of new hotels is largely driven by construction costs and expected performance of existing hotels. In aggregate, we expect the U.S. hotel supply to increase over the near term. On a market-by-market basis, some markets may experience new hotel room openings at or greater than historic levels, including in Chicago, Houston, New York City and Washington DC where there are currently higher-than-average supplies of new hotel room openings. Additionally, an increase in the supply of vacation rental or sharing services such as Airbnb also affects the ability of existing hotels to absorb demand for lodging.

· Revenues and expenses. We believe that marginal improvements in RevPAR index, even in the face of declining revenues, are a good indicator of the relative quality and appeal of our hotels, and our operators’ effectiveness in maximizing revenues. Similarly, we also evaluate our operators’ effectiveness in minimizing incremental operating expenses in the context of increasing revenues or, conversely, in reducing operating expenses in the context of declining revenues.

21

With respect to improving RevPAR index, we continue to work with our hotel operators to optimize revenue management initiatives while taking into consideration market demand trends and the pricing strategies of competitor hotels in our markets. We also develop capital investment programs designed to ensure each of our hotels is well renovated and positioned to appeal to groups and individual travelers fitting target guest profiles. Increased capital investment in our properties may lead to short-term revenue disruption and negatively impact RevPAR index. Our revenue management initiatives are generally oriented towards maximizing ADR even if the result may be lower occupancy than may be achieved through lower ADR. Increases in RevPAR attributable to increases in ADR may be accompanied by minimal additional expenses, while increases in RevPAR attributable to higher occupancy may result in higher variable expenses such as housekeeping, labor and utilities expense. Our Comparable Portfolio RevPAR index increased 130 basis points during the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.  The increase in our Comparable Portfolio RevPAR index was due in part to increased rates at our Boston Park Plaza and Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning and at our Renaissance Washington DC and Marriott Tysons Corner due to the Presidential inauguration and the Women’s March on Washington. These increases were partially offset by decreased rates at our Courtyard by Marriott Los Angeles and Renaissance Los Angeles Airport due to increased competition from area hotels that were under renovation during the first quarter of 2016.

We continue to work with our operators to identify operational efficiencies designed to reduce expenses while minimally affecting guest experience and hotel employee satisfaction. Key asset management initiatives include optimizing hotel staffing levels, increasing the efficiency of the hotels, such as installing energy efficient management and inventory control systems, and selectively combining certain food and beverage outlets. Our operational efficiency initiatives may be difficult to implement, as most categories of variable operating expenses, such as utilities and housekeeping labor costs, fluctuate with changes in occupancy. Furthermore, our hotels operate with significant fixed costs, such as general and administrative expense, insurance, property taxes, and other expenses associated with owning hotels, over which our operators have little control. We have experienced, either currently or in the past, increases in hourly wages, employee benefits (especially health insurance), utility costs and property insurance, which have negatively affected our operating margins. Moreover, there are limits to how far our operators can reduce expenses without affecting brand standards or the competitiveness of our hotels.

Operating Results. The following table presents our unaudited operating results for our total portfolio for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, including the amount and percentage change in the results between the two periods.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016		Change $		Change %
	(unaudited and in thousands, except statistical data)
REVENUES
Room	$	190,367	$	187,297	$	3,070	1.6	%
Food and beverage		75,501		71,234		4,267	6.0	%
Other operating		14,875		15,761		(886)	(5.6)	%
Total revenues		280,743		274,292		6,451	2.4	%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Hotel operating		168,137		171,736		(3,599)	(2.1)	%
Other property-level expenses		34,738		34,713		25	0.1	%
Corporate overhead		6,779		6,717		62	0.9	%
Depreciation and amortization		40,807		40,047		760	1.9	%
Total operating expenses		250,461		253,213		(2,752)	(1.1)	%
Operating income		30,282		21,079		9,203	43.7	%
Interest and other income		721		489		232	47.4	%
Interest expense		(11,249)		(20,010)		8,761	43.8	%
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(4)		(105)		101	96.2	%
Gain on sale of assets		44,285		—		44,285	100.0	%
Income before income taxes		64,035		1,453		62,582	4,307.1	%
Income tax provision		(208)		(237)		29	12.2	%
NET INCOME		63,827		1,216		62,611	5,148.9	%
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest		(1,992)		(1,650)		(342)	(20.7)	%
Preferred stock dividends		(3,207)		(2,766)		(441)	(15.9)	%
INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$	58,628	$	(3,200)	$	61,828	1,932.1	%

Operating Statistics.  The following table includes comparisons of the key operating metrics for our Comparable Portfolio (27 hotels).

22

	Three Months Ended  March 31,
	2017						2016						Change
	Occ%		ADR		RevPAR		Occ%		ADR		RevPAR		Occ%		ADR		RevPAR
Total Portfolio	77.7	%	$	203.48	$	158.10	77.8	%	$	192.54	$	149.80	(10)	bps	5.7	%	5.5	%

Room revenue. Room revenue increased $3.1 million, or 1.6%, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 as follows:

Room revenue generated by the 27 hotels we owned as of March 31, 2017 (our “Existing Portfolio”), increased $8.4 million during the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 due to an increase in ADR ($8.6 million), partially offset by a decrease in occupancy ($0.2 million). The increase in ADR was primarily driven by strong demand, allowing for double-digit ADR growth in Park City, Orlando, San Diego and Washington DC. In addition, both the Renaissance Washington DC and the Marriott Tysons Corner experienced double digit ADR growth as a result of the Presidential inauguration and the Women’s March on Washington.  Finally, both the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort experienced double digit ADR growth post-repositioning. During the first quarter of 2016, 4,377 room nights were out of service at the Boston Park Plaza, displacing approximately $0.8 million in room revenue based on the hotel achieving a potential 60.5% occupancy rate and RevPAR of $88.40 without the renovation. These increases to ADR were partially offset by weak Boston and Chicago markets, increased competition in New York City and a weak energy market in Houston. 

The decrease in our Existing Portfolio’s occupancy during the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was caused by 15,848 fewer transient room nights, partially offset by 6,711 more group room nights. Transient room nights decreased due to a weak Chicago market combined with excess supply, as well as several of our hotels who pushed transient rate at the expense of occupancy. Group room nights increased, to the detriment of transient room nights, in Baltimore, Boston, New Orleans, Newport Beach and Orlando. In addition, the Houston hotels experienced a decrease in group room nights due to a weak energy market.

The increase in our Existing Portfolio’s room revenue was partially offset by the impact on revenue from our sales of the Sheraton Cerritos in May 2016 and the Fairmont Newport Beach in February 2017 (the “Two Sold Hotels”). The sale of the Two Sold Hotels caused room revenue to decrease by $5.3 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. 

Food and beverage revenue. Food and beverage revenue increased $4.3 million, or 6.0%, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 as follows: 

Food and beverage revenue generated by our Existing Portfolio increased $6.3 million during the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to increased banquet and outlet revenue caused by the increase in group room nights. In addition, both banquet and outlet revenue increased at the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort due to additional restaurant and meeting space options available post-repositioning, and the Hyatt Regency San Francisco due to the redesign of certain restaurant and lounge areas and the introduction of a new grab-and-go concept. These increases were partially offset by temporary decreases in outlet revenue due to restaurant renovations during the first quarter of 2017 at the Marriott Quincy and the Renaissance Los Angeles Airport, as well as decreased banquet revenue at the Marriott Quincy due to renovation of the function space during the first quarter of 2017, and at the Hilton Times Square due to the elimination of meeting space during 2016. In addition, room service revenue decreased at both the Hilton Times Square and the Hyatt Regency San Francisco due to the elimination of this dining option.

The increase in our Existing Portfolio’s food and beverage revenue was partially offset by the Two Sold Hotels, which caused food and beverage revenue to decrease by $2.0 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.  

Other operating revenue. Other operating revenue decreased $0.9 million, or 5.6%, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 as follows:

Other operating revenue in our Existing Portfolio decreased $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to decreases in parking revenue, resort fees, spa revenue, telephone/internet revenue and tenant lease revenue. These decreases in other operating revenue during the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 were partially offset by increased retail revenue at the Wailea Beach Resort, combined with increases in attrition and cancellation revenue at several hotels.

The Two Sold Hotels caused other operating revenue to decrease by $0.4 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

Hotel operating expenses.  Hotel operating expenses, which are comprised of room, food and beverage, advertising and promotion, repairs and maintenance, utilities, franchise costs, property tax, ground lease and insurance, and other hotel operating expenses decreased $3.6 million, or 2.1%, during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 as follows:

23

The Two Sold Hotels caused hotel operating expenses to decrease by  $4.9 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.  

Hotel operating expenses in our Existing Portfolio increased $1.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. This increase is primarily related to the corresponding increases in room revenue, food and beverage revenue and retail revenue. In addition, hotel operating expenses in our Existing Portfolio increased in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 due to the following increased expenses: advertising and promotion due to increased payroll and related costs in this department, combined with increased group booking fees and increased controllable expenses such as marketing and public relations; franchise costs due to the increase in revenues; building rent at the Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile due to an operating expense credit received from the landlord in the first quarter of 2016; and Hawaii general excise tax (“GET”) due to higher revenue at the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning. These increases in hotel operating expenses were partially offset by the following decreased expenses: property taxes due to decreased assessments and appeal fees at several hotels; ground lease expense at the Hilton San Diego Bayfront and the Hilton Times Square; utilities due to a higher than average temperatures during the first quarter of 2017 in the Midwest and East; and spa expense due to the corresponding decline in spa revenue.  

Other property-level expenses.  Other property-level expenses increased $25,000, or 0.1%, during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 as follows:

Other property-level expenses in our Existing Portfolio increased $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to increases in the following expenses caused by higher revenue: management fees; credit and collection expenses; and supplies. Partially offsetting these increased expenses, both contract and professional fees and license and permit costs decreased during the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

The Two Sold Hotels caused other property-level expenses to decrease by $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

Corporate overhead expense.  Corporate overhead expense increased $0.1 million, or 0.9%, during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016, primarily due to increased GET recognized during the first quarter of 2017 related to a $5.0 million performance guarantee provided by the manager of the Wailea Beach Resort, combined with increased deferred stock compensation expense and employee relations, recruitment and relocation expense. These increases in corporate overhead expense during the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 were partially offset by decreased payroll and related costs.

Depreciation and amortization expense.  Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.8 million, or 1.9%, during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 as follows:

Depreciation and amortization expense in our Existing Portfolio increased $2.2 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, due to additional depreciation recognized at the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning.

The Two Sold Hotels caused depreciation and amortization to decrease by $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

Interest and other income.  Interest and other income totaled $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, and $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016.  During the first quarter of 2017, we recognized $0.4 million in interest and miscellaneous income. In addition, we recognized $0.3 million in earn-out proceeds related to the Royal Palm Miami Beach, which we sold in 2011. At the time of the sale of the Royal Palm Miami Beach, we retained an earn-out right which enabled us to receive future payments of up to $20.0 million in the event that the hotel achieved certain return hurdles. With the receipt of the $0.3 million during the first quarter of 2017, the earn-out is complete.

In the first quarter of 2016, we recognized $0.3 million in interest and miscellaneous income and $0.2 million in energy rebates due to energy efficient renovations at our hotels.

Interest expense.  We incurred interest expense as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
Interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations	$	11,328	$	13,053
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net		(657)		6,402
Amortization of deferred financing fees		578		555
	$	11,249	$	20,010

24

Interest expense decreased $8.8 million, or 43.8%, during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016. Interest expense on our debt and capital lease obligations decreased $1.7 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 as a result of lower balances due to monthly amortization and loan repayments during 2016 and 2017. Partially offsetting these decreases, interest expense on our debt and capital lease obligations increased due to higher interest on our variable rate debt, as well as interest on our Senior Notes issued in January 2017. In addition, interest expense decreased $7.1 million as we recognized a $0.7 million gain on our interest rate derivatives during the first quarter of 2017 and a loss of $6.4 million on our interest rate derivatives during the first quarter of 2016.

Our weighted average interest rate per annum, including our variable rate debt obligation, was approximately 4.2% and 4.4% at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Approximately 77.8% and 79.3% of our outstanding notes payable had fixed interest rates at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

For information regarding our 2017 debt transactions, see the discussion included in “Liquidity and Capital Resources-Debt.”

Loss on extinguishment of debt. Loss on extinguishment of debt totaled $4,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017, and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016.  During the first quarter of 2017, we recognized a loss of $4,000 related to our repayment of debt secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf. During the first quarter of 2017, we recognized a  loss of $0.1 million related to our repayment of debt secured by the Boston Park Plaza.

Gain on sale of assets. Gain on sale of assets totaled $44.3 million and zero for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. During the first quarter of 2017, we sold the Fairmont Newport Beach for net proceeds of $122.8 million, and recognized a net gain on the sale of $44.3 million. The sale of the Fairmont Newport Beach did not qualify as a discontinued operation.

Income tax provision. Income tax provision totaled $0.2 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. We lease our hotels to the TRS Lessee and its subsidiaries, which are subject to federal and state income taxes. In addition, the REIT and Operating Partnership may also be subject to various state and local income taxes. During the first quarter of 2017, we recognized combined federal and state income tax expense based on 2017 projected taxable income net of operating loss carryforwards for our taxable entities.

During the first quarter of 2016, we recognized combined federal and state income tax expense of $0.2 million based on 2016 projected taxable income net of operating loss carryforwards for our taxable entities. 

Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest. Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest totaled $2.0 million and $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Consistent with the Presentation Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), our net income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 includes 100% of the net income generated by the entity that owns the Hilton San Diego Bayfront. The outside 25.0% interest in the entity that owns the Hilton San Diego Bayfront earned net income of $2.0 million and $1.7 million during the first quarter of 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Preferred stock dividends.  Preferred stock dividends were paid as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
Series D preferred stock	$	—	$	2,300
Series E preferred stock		1,998		466
Series F preferred stock		1,209		—
	$	3,207	$	2,766

We redeemed all 4,600,000 shares of our Series D preferred stock in April 2016. In March 2016, we issued 4,600,000 shares of Series E preferred stock, and in May 2016, we issued 3,000,000 shares of Series F preferred stock.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures. We use the following “non-GAAP financial measures” that we believe are useful to investors as key supplemental measures of our operating performance: EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, FFO attributable to common stockholders, Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders and Comparable Portfolio revenues. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, FFO attributable to common stockholders, Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders and Comparable Portfolio revenues, as calculated by us, may not be comparable to other companies that do not define such terms exactly as the Company. These non-GAAP measures are used in addition to and in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP. They should not be considered as alternatives to operating profit, cash flow from operations, or any other operating performance measure prescribed by GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures reflect additional ways of viewing our operations that we believe, when viewed with our GAAP results and the reconciliations to the corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting

25

our business than could be obtained absent this disclosure. For example, we believe that Comparable Portfolio revenues are useful to both us and investors in evaluating our operating performance by removing the impact of non-hotel results such as the amortization of favorable and unfavorable tenant lease contracts. We also believe that our use of Comparable Portfolio revenues is useful to both us and our investors as it facilitates the comparison of our operating results from period to period by removing fluctuations caused by any acquisitions or dispositions, as well as by those hotels that we classify as held for sale, those hotels that are undergoing a material renovation or repositioning and those hotels whose room counts have materially changed during either the current or prior year. We strongly encourage investors to review our financial information in its entirety and not to rely on a single financial measure.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are commonly used measures of performance in many industries. We believe EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance because these measures help investors evaluate and compare the results of our operations from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest expense) and our asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization) from our operating results. We also believe the use of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA facilitate comparisons between us and other lodging REITs, hotel owners who are not REITs and other capital-intensive companies. In addition, certain covenants included in our indebtedness use EBITDA as a measure of financial compliance. We also use EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as measures in determining the value of hotel acquisitions and dispositions.

Historically, we have adjusted EBITDA when evaluating our performance because we believe that the exclusion of certain additional items described below provides useful information to investors regarding our operating performance, and that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, when combined with the primary GAAP presentation of net income, is beneficial to an investor’s complete understanding of our operating performance. We adjust EBITDA for the following items, which may occur in any period, and refer to this measure as Adjusted EBITDA:

· Amortization of deferred stock compensation: we exclude the noncash expense incurred with the amortization of deferred stock compensation as this expense is based on historical stock prices at the date of grant to our corporate employees and does not reflect the underlying performance of our hotels.

· Amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts: we exclude the noncash amortization of the favorable management contract asset recorded in conjunction with our acquisition of the Hilton Garden Inn Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile, along with the favorable and unfavorable tenant lease contracts, as applicable, recorded in conjunction with our acquisitions of the Boston Park Plaza, the Hilton Garden Inn Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile, the Hilton New Orleans St. Charles, the Hyatt Regency San Francisco and the Wailea Beach Resort. We exclude the noncash amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts because it is based on historical cost accounting and is of lesser significance in evaluating our actual performance for the current period.

· Ground rent adjustments: we exclude the noncash expense incurred from straight-lining our ground lease obligations as this expense does not reflect the actual rent amounts due to the respective lessors in the current period and is of lesser significance in evaluating our actual performance for the current period. We do, however, include an adjustment for the cash ground lease expense recorded on the Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile’s building lease. Upon acquisition of this hotel, we determined that the building lease was a capital lease, and, therefore, we include a portion of the capital lease payment each month in interest expense. We include an adjustment for ground lease expense on capital leases in order to more accurately reflect the actual rent due to the hotel’s lessor in the current period, as well as the operating performance of the Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile.

· Real estate transactions: we exclude the effect of gains and losses on the disposition of depreciable assets because we believe that including them in Adjusted EBITDA is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our assets. In addition, material gains or losses from the depreciated value of the disposed assets could be less important to investors given that the depreciated asset value often does not reflect its market value.

· Gains or losses from debt transactions: we exclude the effect of finance charges and premiums associated with the extinguishment of debt, including the acceleration of deferred financing costs from the original issuance of the debt being redeemed or retired because, like interest expense, their removal helps investors evaluate and compare the results of our operations from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure.

· Acquisition costs: under GAAP, costs associated with completed acquisitions that meet the definition of a business in accordance with the Business Combinations Topic of the FASB ASC are expensed in the year incurred. We exclude the effect of these costs because we believe they are not reflective of the ongoing performance of the Company or our hotels.

· Noncontrolling interest: we deduct the noncontrolling partner’s pro rata share of any EBITDA adjustments related to our consolidated Hilton San Diego Bayfront partnership.

· Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle: from time to time, the FASB promulgates new accounting standards that require the consolidated statement of operations to reflect the cumulative effect of a change in accounting

26

principle. We exclude these one-time adjustments, which include the accounting impact from prior periods, because they do not reflect our actual performance for that period.

· Impairment losses: we exclude the effect of impairment losses because we believe that including them in Adjusted EBITDA is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our remaining assets. In addition, we believe that impairment charges, which are based off of historical cost account values, are similar to gains (losses) on dispositions and depreciation expense, both of which are also excluded from Adjusted EBITDA.

· Other adjustments: we exclude other adjustments that we believe are outside the ordinary course of business because we do not believe these costs reflect our actual performance for that period and/or the ongoing operations of our hotels. Such items may include: lawsuit settlement costs; prior year property tax assessments or credits; property-level restructuring, severance and management transition costs; lease terminations; and any gains or losses we have recognized on sales or redemptions of assets other than real estate investments. 

The following table reconciles our unaudited net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for our hotel portfolio for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
Net income	$	63,827	$	1,216
Operations held for investment:
Depreciation and amortization		40,807		40,047
Amortization of lease intangibles		63		63
Interest expense		11,249		20,010
Income tax provision		208		237
Noncontrolling interest:
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest		(1,992)		(1,650)
Depreciation and amortization		(875)		(865)
Interest expense		(457)		(413)
EBITDA		112,830		58,645
Operations held for investment:
Amortization of deferred stock compensation		1,749		1,614
Amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts, net		99		(4)
Noncash ground rent		(275)		488
Capital lease obligation interest — cash ground rent		(351)		(351)
Gain on sale of assets, net		(44,570)		(7)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		4		105
Prior year property tax adjustments, net		—		(97)
Property-level restructuring, severance and management transition costs		—		1,560
Noncontrolling interest:
Noncash ground rent		72		(113)
		(43,272)		3,195
Adjusted EBITDA	$	69,558	$	61,840

Adjusted EBITDA was $69.6 million and $61.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. Adjusted EBITDA increased $7.7 million the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 in part due to additional earnings generated by the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning, combined with increased earnings at our Park City, Orlando, San Diego and Washington DC hotels due to strong demand at these locales. Partially offsetting these increases, Adjusted EBITDA decreased primarily due to the sales of the Fairmont Newport Beach and the Sheraton Cerritos in February 2017 and May 2016, respectively. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA was negatively impacted during the three months ended March 31, 2017 by weak Boston and Chicago markets, increased competition in New York City and a weak energy market in Houston. 

We believe that the presentation of FFO attributable to common stockholders provides useful information to investors regarding our operating performance because it is a measure of our operations without regard to specified noncash items such as real estate depreciation and amortization, amortization of lease intangibles, any real estate impairment loss and any gain or loss on sale of real estate assets, all of which are based on historical cost accounting and may be of lesser significance in evaluating our current performance. Our presentation of FFO attributable to common stockholders conforms to the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts’ (“NAREIT”) definition of “FFO applicable to common shares.” Our presentation may not be comparable to FFO

27

reported by other REITs that do not define the terms in accordance with the current NAREIT definition, or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do.

We also present Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders when evaluating our operating performance because we believe that the exclusion of certain additional items described below provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our ongoing operating performance, and may facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and our peer companies. We adjust FFO attributable to common stockholders for the following items, which may occur in any period, and refer to this measure as Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders:

· Amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts: we exclude the noncash amortization of the favorable management contract asset recorded in conjunction with our acquisition of the Hilton Garden Inn Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile, along with the favorable and unfavorable tenant lease contracts, as applicable, recorded in conjunction with our acquisitions of the Boston Park Plaza, the Hilton Garden Inn Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile, the Hilton New Orleans St. Charles, the Hyatt Regency San Francisco and the Wailea Beach Resort. We exclude the noncash amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts because it is based on historical cost accounting and is of lesser significance in evaluating our actual performance for the current period.

· Noncash ground rent adjustments: we exclude the noncash expense incurred from straight-lining our ground lease obligations as this expense does not reflect the actual rent amounts due to the respective lessors in the current period and is of lesser significance in evaluating our actual performance for the current period.

· Gains or losses from debt transactions: we exclude the effect of finance charges and premiums associated with the extinguishment of debt, including the acceleration of deferred financing costs from the original issuance of the debt being redeemed or retired, as well as the noncash gains or losses on our derivatives. We believe that these items are not reflective of our ongoing finance costs.

· Acquisition costs: under GAAP, costs associated with completed acquisitions that meet the definition of a business in accordance with the Business Combinations Topic of the FASB ASC are expensed in the year incurred. We exclude the effect of these costs because we believe they are not reflective of the ongoing performance of the Company or our hotels.

· Impairment losses: we exclude the effect of non-real estate impairment losses because we believe that including them in Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our remaining assets.

· Noncontrolling interest: we deduct the noncontrolling partner’s pro rata share of any FFO adjustments related to our consolidated Hilton San Diego Bayfront partnership.

· Other adjustments: we exclude other adjustments that we believe are outside the ordinary course of business because we do not believe these costs reflect our actual performance for that period and/or the ongoing operations of our hotels. Such items may include: lawsuit settlement costs; prior year property tax assessments or credits; property-level restructuring, severance and management transition costs; lease terminations; any gains or losses we have recognized on redemptions of assets other than real estate investments; and income tax benefits or provisions associated with the application of net operating loss carryforwards, uncertain tax positions or with the sale of assets other than real estate investments.

28

The following table reconciles our unaudited net income to FFO attributable to common stockholders and Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders for our hotel portfolio for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
Net income	$	63,827	$	1,216
Preferred stock dividends		(3,207)		(2,766)
Operations held for investment:
Real estate depreciation and amortization		40,678		39,893
Amortization of lease intangibles		63		63
Gain on sale of assets, net		(44,570)		(7)
Noncontrolling interest:
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest		(1,992)		(1,650)
Real estate depreciation and amortization		(875)		(865)
FFO attributable to common stockholders		53,924		35,884
Operations held for investment:
Amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts, net		99		(4)
Noncash ground rent		(275)		488
Noncash interest related to (gain) loss on derivatives, net		(657)		6,402
Loss on extinguishment of debt		4		105
Prior year property tax adjustments, net		—		(97)
Property-level restructuring, severance and management transition costs		—		1,560
Noncontrolling interest:
Noncash ground rent		72		(113)
Noncash interest related to loss on derivative		(4)		—
		(761)		8,341
Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders	$	53,163	$	44,225

Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders was $53.2 million and $44.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders increased $8.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to the same reasons noted in the discussion regarding Adjusted EBITDA. In addition, Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders increased in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 due to a decrease in interest expense.

Investing Activities

Acquisitions. We did not acquire any hotels during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. While our primary focus is on acquiring urban and resort upper upscale hotels, our acquisition program is aimed at generating attractive risk-adjusted returns on our investment dollars, and therefore we may target lodging assets outside of the typical branded, urban, upper upscale and resort profile represented by our Existing Portfolio in order to capitalize on opportunities which may arise. We intend to select the brandings and operators for our hotels that we believe will lead to the highest returns. Additionally, the scope of our acquisitions program may include large hotel portfolios or hotel loans. Future acquisitions, if any, may be funded with cash on hand, by our issuance of additional debt or equity securities, including our common and preferred OP units provided that our stock price is at an attractive level, by draws on our $400.0 million senior unsecured credit facility, or by proceeds received from sales of existing assets.

Dispositions. We have from time to time divested of assets that no longer fit our target profile, will not offer long-term returns in excess of our cost of capital, will achieve a sale price in excess of our internal valuation, or that have high risk relative to their anticipated returns. In February 2017, we sold the 444-room Fairmont Newport Beach for net proceeds of $122.8 million, and recognized a net gain on the sale of $44.3 million. In May 2016, we sold the 203-room Sheraton Cerritos for net proceeds of $41.2 million, and recognized a net gain on the sale of $18.2 million. Neither of these two sales represented a strategic shift that had a major impact on our business plan or our primary markets; therefore, neither of these two sales qualified as a discontinued operation. 

Renovations. We invested $29.9 million and $48.8 million in capital improvements to our hotel portfolio during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Consistent with our strategy, during the first three months of 2017 and 2016, we undertook major renovations, repositionings and ordinary course rooms, restaurants and public space renovations. None of our first quarter 2017 renovations caused room revenue disruption; however, during the first quarter of 2016 our repositioning of the Boston Park Plaza caused room revenue disruption of approximately $0.8 million, all of which was in line with our expectations.

29

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During the periods presented, our sources of cash included our operating activities and working capital, as well as proceeds from our sale of the Fairmont Newport Beach, sales of other assets, our term loan agreement drawn in January 2016, our Senior Notes and our preferred stock offering. Our primary uses of cash were for capital expenditures for hotels, operating expenses, repayment of notes payable, dividends and distributions on our common and preferred stock and distributions to our joint venture partner. We cannot be certain that traditional sources of funds will be available in the future.

Operating activities. Our net cash provided by or used in operating activities fluctuates primarily as a result of changes in RevPAR and the operating cash flow of our hotels. Our net cash provided by or used in operating activities may also be affected by changes in our portfolio resulting from hotel acquisitions, dispositions or renovations. Net cash provided by operating activities was $44.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to $43.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016.  The net increase to cash provided by operating activities during the first three months of 2017 was primarily due to increased cash generated by our hotels, most significantly at the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning, partially offset by decreased cash generated due to our sales of the Fairmont Newport Beach and the Sheraton Cerritos. 

Investing activities. Our net cash provided by or used in investing activities fluctuates primarily as a result of acquisitions, dispositions and renovations of hotels. Net cash provided by or used in investing activities during the first three months of 2017 as compared to the first three months of 2016 was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
Proceeds from sales of assets	$	123,117	$	7
Restricted cash — replacement reserve		(504)		(309)
Renovations and additions to hotel properties		(29,872)		(48,818)
Payment for interest rate derivative		(19)		—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	$	92,722	$	(49,120)

Net cash provided by investing activities was $92.7 million during the first three months of 2017 as compared to net cash used of $49.1 million for the same period in 2016.  During the first quarter of 2017, we received proceeds of $123.1 million from our sales of the Fairmont Newport Beach and surplus FF&E, along with the earn-out proceeds received related to the sale of the Royal Palm Miami Beach. These cash inflows were partially offset as we increased our restricted cash replacement reserve accounts by $0.5 million, paid $29.9 million for renovations and additions to our portfolio and paid $19,000 for an interest rate cap agreement on our variable-rate mortgage secured by the Hilton San Diego Bayfront.

During the first quarter of 2016, we increased our restricted cash replacement reserve accounts by $0.3 million and paid $48.8 million for renovations and additions to our portfolio. These cash outflows were slightly offset by $7,000 received from the sale of surplus FF&E.

Financing activities. Our net cash provided by or used in financing activities fluctuates primarily as a result of our issuance of common stock, our issuance and repayment of notes payable and our credit facility, and our issuance and redemption of other forms of capital, including preferred equity. Net cash used in financing activities during the first three months of 2017 as compared to the first three months of 2016 was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
Proceeds from preferred stock offerings	$	—	$	115,000
Payment of preferred stock offering costs		—		(4,016)
Repurchase of common stock for employee withholding obligations		(3,793)		(2,641)
Proceeds from notes payable		240,000		100,000
Payments on notes payable		(178,599)		(117,558)
Payments of deferred financing costs		(13)		(78)
Dividends and distributions paid		(119,847)		(186,301)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest		(2,325)		(775)
Net cash used in financing activities	$	(64,577)	$	(96,369)

Net cash used in financing activities was $64.6 million for the first three months of 2017 as compared to $96.4 million for the first three months of 2016.  Net cash used in financing activities during the first three months of 2017 consisted of the following cash outflows: $3.8 million paid to repurchase common shares to satisfy the statutory minimum federal and state tax obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted common shares issued to employees; $178.6 million in principal payments on our notes payable, including $176.0 million for the loan secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf and $2.6 million in principal payments on our notes payable; $13,000 in deferred financing costs related to our Senior Notes and our credit facility; $119.8 million in dividends

30

and distributions to our common and preferred stockholders; and $2.3 million in distributions to the noncontrolling interest in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront. These cash outflows were partially offset by $240.0 million in proceeds received from the Senior Notes.

Net cash used in financing activities during the first three months of 2016 consisted of the following cash outflows: $2.6 million paid to repurchase common shares to satisfy the statutory minimum federal and state tax obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted common shares issued to employees; $117.6 million in principal payments on our notes payable, including $114.2 million for the loan secured by the Boston Park Plaza and $3.4 million in principal payments on our notes payable; $0.1 million in deferred financing costs related to our $100.0 million unsecured term loan; $186.3 million in dividends and distributions to our common and preferred stockholders; and $0.8 million in distributions to the noncontrolling interest in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront. These cash outflows were slightly offset by $111.0 million in net proceeds received from the issuance of our Series E preferred stock, and $100.0 million in proceeds received from our unsecured term loan.

Future. We expect our primary uses of cash to be for operating expenses, capital investments in our hotels, repayment of principal on our notes payable and credit facility, interest expense, dividends and distributions on our common and preferred stock, potential repurchases of our common stock, and acquisitions of hotels, including possibly hotel portfolios. We expect our primary sources of cash will continue to be our operating activities, working capital, notes payable and our credit facility, dispositions of hotel properties, and proceeds from public and private offerings of debt securities and common and preferred stock. Our financial objectives include the maintenance of our credit ratios, appropriate levels of liquidity and continued balance sheet strength. Consistent with maintaining our low leverage and balance sheet strength, in the near-term, we expect to fund future acquisitions, if any, largely through cash on hand, the issuance of common or preferred equity, provided that our stock price is at an attractive level, or by proceeds received from sales of existing assets in order to selectively grow the quality and scale of our portfolio. Our ability to raise funds through the issuance of equity securities depends on, among other things, general market conditions for hotel companies and REITs and market perceptions about us. We will continue to analyze alternate sources of capital in an effort to minimize our capital costs and maximize our financial flexibility, including pursuant to the ATM agreements we entered into in February 2017. Under the terms of the agreements, we may issue and sell from time to time through or to the managers, as sales agents and/or principals, shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering amount of up to $300.0 million. Through March 31, 2017, we have not issued or sold any shares of our common stock under the agreements. However, when needed, the capital markets may not be available to us on favorable terms or at all.

Cash Balance. As of March 31, 2017, our unrestricted cash balance was $441.8 million. By minimizing our need to access external capital by maintaining higher than typical cash balances, our financial security and flexibility are meaningfully enhanced because we are able to fund our business needs (including payment of cash distributions on our common stock, if declared) and near-term debt maturities with our cash on hand.

Debt. As of March 31, 2017, we had $1.0 billion of consolidated debt, $506.2 million of cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, and total assets of $3.7 billion. We believe that by controlling debt levels, staggering maturity dates and maintaining a highly flexible capital structure, we can maintain lower capital costs than more highly leveraged companies, or companies with limited flexibility due to restrictive corporate-level financial covenants.

The weighted average term to maturity of our debt as of March 31, 2017 is approximately 6 years, and 77.8% of our debt, including the effects of interest rate swap agreements, is fixed rate with a weighted average interest rate of 4.6%. Including our variable-rate debt obligation based on the variable rate at March 31, 2017, the weighted average interest rate on our debt is 4.2%.

As of March 31, 2017, all of our outstanding debt had fixed interest rates or had been swapped to fixed interest rates, except the $221.5 million non-recourse mortgage on the Hilton San Diego Bayfront, which is subject to an interest rate cap agreement that caps the interest rate at 4.25% until May 2017. In March 2017, we purchased a new interest rate cap agreement that will continue to cap the interest rate at 4.25% until May 2019. Our mortgage debt is in the form of single asset non-recourse loans rather than cross-collateralized multi-property pools. In addition to our mortgage debt, as of March 31, 2017, we have two unsecured corporate-level term loans as well as the Senior Notes. We currently believe this structure is appropriate for the operating characteristics of our business as it isolates risk and provides flexibility for various portfolio management initiatives, including the sale of individual hotels subject to existing debt.

Each of our 2017 year-to-date debt transactions is discussed below.

In January 2017, we received proceeds of $240.0 million in a  private placement of the Senior Notes. The private placement consisted of the Series A Senior Notes, which includes $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.69%, maturing in January 2026, and the Series B Senior Notes, which includes $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.79%, maturing in January 2028.

In January 2017, we used proceeds received from the Senior Notes to repay the loan secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf, which had a balance of $176.0 million and an interest rate of 5.58%. The Marriott Boston Long Wharf loan was scheduled to mature in April 2017, and was available to be repaid without penalty in January 2017.

31

We may in the future seek to obtain mortgages on one or all of our 22 unencumbered hotels, 15 of which are currently held by subsidiaries whose interests are pledged to our credit facility. Our 22 unencumbered hotels include: Boston Park Plaza; Courtyard by Marriott Los Angeles; Embassy Suites Chicago; Hilton Garden Inn Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile; Hilton New Orleans St. Charles; Hilton North Houston; Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile; Hyatt Regency Newport Beach; Hyatt Regency San Francisco; Marriott Boston Long Wharf; Marriott Houston; Marriott Park City; Marriott Philadelphia; Marriott Portland; Marriott Quincy; Marriott Tysons Corner; Renaissance Harborplace; Renaissance Long Beach; Renaissance Los Angeles Airport; Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld®; Renaissance Westchester; and Wailea Beach Resort. Should we obtain secured financing on any or all of our unencumbered hotels, the amount of capital available through our credit facility may be reduced.

Contractual Obligations.  The following table summarizes our payment obligations and commitments as of March 31, 2017 (in thousands):

	Payment due by period
				Less Than		1 to 3		3 to 5		More than
	Total		1 year			years		years		5 years
Notes payable	$	997,346	$		10,167	$	234,213	$	194,192	$	558,774
Interest obligations on notes payable (1)		258,488			41,964		80,694		58,001		77,829
Capital lease obligations		15,575			1		2		3		15,569
Interest obligations on capital leases		97,697			1,402		2,804		2,803		90,688
Operating lease obligations		357,508			10,196		20,112		20,059		307,141
Construction commitments		46,139			46,139		—		—		—
Employment obligations		2,724			2,724		—		—		—
Total	$	1,775,477	$		112,593	$	337,825	$	275,058	$	1,050,001

(1) Interest on our variable rate debt obligation is calculated based on the variable rate at March 31, 2017, and includes the effect of our interest rate derivative agreements.

Capital Expenditures and Reserve Funds

We believe we maintain each of our hotels in good repair and condition and in general conformity with applicable franchise and management agreements, ground, building and air leases, laws and regulations. Our capital expenditures primarily relate to the ongoing maintenance of our hotels and are budgeted in the reserve accounts described in the following paragraph. We also incur capital expenditures for cyclical renovations, hotel repositionings and development. We invested $29.9 million in our portfolio during the first quarter of 2017. As of March 31, 2017, we have contractual construction commitments totaling $46.1 million. If we renovate or develop additional hotels in the future, our capital expenditures will likely increase.

With respect to our hotels that are operated under management or franchise agreements with major national hotel brands and for all of our hotels subject to first mortgage liens, we are obligated to maintain an FF&E reserve account for future planned and emergency-related capital expenditures at these hotels. The amount funded into each of these reserve accounts is determined pursuant to the management, franchise and loan agreements for each of the respective hotels, ranging between zero and 5.0% of the respective hotel’s total annual revenue. As of March 31, 2017, our balance sheet includes restricted cash of $62.7 million, which was held in FF&E reserve accounts for future capital expenditures at the majority of our  27 hotels. According to certain loan agreements, reserve funds are to be held by the lenders or managers in restricted cash accounts, and we are not required to spend the entire amount in such reserve accounts each year.

Seasonality and Volatility

As is typical of the lodging industry, we experience some seasonality in our business as indicated in the table below. Revenue for certain of our hotels is generally affected by seasonal business patterns (e.g., the first quarter is strong in Orlando, the second quarter is strong for the Mid-Atlantic business hotels, and the fourth quarter is strong for New York City and Hawaii). Quarterly revenue also may be adversely affected by renovations and repositionings, our managers’ effectiveness in generating business and by events beyond our control, such as extreme weather conditions, terrorist attacks or alerts, civil unrest, public health concerns, airline

32

strikes or reduced airline capacity, economic factors and other considerations affecting travel. Revenues for our 27 hotel Comparable Portfolio by quarter for 2016 and 2017 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	First			Second			Third			Fourth
Revenues	Quarter			Quarter			Quarter			Quarter			Total
2016:
Total revenues	$	274,292		$	322,160		$	303,304		$	289,584		$	1,189,340
Sold hotel revenues (1)		(11,248)			(10,148)			(8,373)			(7,373)			(37,142)
Non-hotel revenues (2)		(121)			(99)			210			(5,066)			(5,076)
Total Comparable Portfolio revenues (3)	$	262,923		$	311,913		$	295,141		$	277,145		$	1,147,122
Quarterly Comparable Portfolio revenues as a percentage of total annual revenues		22.9	%		27.2	%		25.7	%		24.2	%		100.00	%
2017:
Total revenues	$	280,743
Sold hotel revenues (1)		(3,541)
Non-hotel revenues (2)		(18)
Total Comparable Portfolio revenues (3)	$	277,184

(1) Sold hotel revenues include those generated by the Fairmont Newport Beach and the Sheraton Cerritos, which we sold in February 2017 and May 2016, respectively.

(2) Non-hotel revenues include the amortization of favorable and unfavorable tenant lease contracts received in conjunction with our acquisitions of the Boston Park Plaza, the Hilton Garden Inn Downtown/Magnificent Mile, the Hilton New Orleans St. Charles, the Hyatt Regency San Francisco and the Wailea Beach Resort.

(3) Total Comparable Portfolio revenues include those generated by our 27 hotel Comparable Portfolio.

Inflation

Inflation may affect our expenses, including, without limitation, by increasing such costs as labor, food, taxes, property and casualty insurance and utilities.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.

We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience, information that is currently available to us and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

· Impairment of long-lived assets. We periodically review each property for possible impairment. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. We perform a Level 3 analysis of fair value, using a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate the fair value of our properties taking into account each property’s expected cash flow from operations, holding period and proceeds from the disposition of the property. The factors addressed in determining estimated proceeds from disposition include anticipated operating cash flow in the year of disposition and terminal capitalization rate. Our judgment is required in determining the discount rate applied to estimated cash flows, growth rate of the properties, operating income of the properties, the need for capital expenditures, as well as specific market and economic conditions.

· Acquisition related assets and liabilities. Accounting for the acquisition of a hotel property or other entity as a business combination requires an allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in the transaction at their respective estimated fair values. The most difficult estimations of individual fair values are those involving long-lived assets, such as property, equipment, intangible assets and capital lease obligations that are assumed as part of the acquisition of a leasehold interest. When we acquire a hotel property or other entity as a business combination, we use all available information to make these fair value determinations, and engage independent valuation specialists to assist in the fair value determinations of the long-lived assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Due to the

33

inherent subjectivity in determining the estimated fair value of long-lived assets, we believe that the recording of acquired assets and liabilities is a critical accounting policy.

· Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation expense is based on the estimated useful life of our assets. The life of the assets is based on a number of assumptions, including the cost and timing of capital expenditures to maintain and refurbish our hotels, as well as specific market and economic conditions. Hotel properties and other investments are depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives primarily ranging from five to 35 years for buildings and improvements and three to 12 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. While we believe our estimates are reasonable, a change in the estimated lives could affect depreciation expense and net income or the gain or loss on the sale of any of our hotels. We have not changed the estimated useful lives of any of our assets during the periods discussed.

Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

To the extent that we incur debt with variable interest rates, our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. We have no derivative financial instruments held for trading purposes. We use derivative financial instruments, which are intended to manage interest rate risks.

As of March 31, 2017,  77.8% of our debt obligations are fixed in nature, which largely mitigates the effect of changes in interest rates on our cash interest payments. If the market rate of interest on our variable rate debt increases or decreases by 100 basis points, interest expense would increase or decrease, respectively, our future earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.0 million based on the variable rate at March 31, 2017. After adjusting for the noncontrolling interest in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront, this increase or decrease in interest expense would increase or decrease, respectively, our future earnings and cash flows by $1.5 million, based on the variable rates at March 31, 2017.  

Item 4.Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Based upon an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. During our fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates, there has not occurred any change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

34

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 1A.Risk Factors

None.

Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(c)Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities:

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)	Average Price Paid per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number (or Appropriate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
January 1, 2017 — January 31, 2017	—	—	—
February 1, 2017 — February 28, 2017	249,303	$   15.21	—
March 1, 2017 — March 31, 2017	—	—	—
Total	249,303	$   15.21	—		$    300,000,000	(2)

(1) Reflects shares of restricted common stock withheld and used for purposes of remitting the statutory minimum federal and state tax obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted common shares issued to employees. The average price paid reflects the average market value of shares withheld for tax purposes.

(2) On February 17, 2017, the Company’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase plan to acquire up to $300.0 million of the Company’s common and preferred stock. As of March 31, 2017, no shares of either the Company’s common or preferred stock have been repurchased. Future purchases will depend on various factors, including the Company’s capital needs, as well as the Company’s common and preferred stock price.

Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5.Other Information

None.

35

Item 6.Exhibits

The following Exhibits are filed as a part of this report:

Exhibit Number	Description
3.1	Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registration statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-117141) filed by the Company).
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q, filed by the Company on August 5, 2008).
3.2.1	First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., effective as of March 19, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on March 22, 2012).
3.2.2	Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., effective as of February 13, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Form 10-K, filed by the Company on February 19, 2015).
3.2.3	Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., effective as of February 17, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on February 21, 2017).
3.3	Articles Supplementary Prohibiting the Company From Electing to be Subject to Section 3-803 of the Maryland General Corporation Law Absent Shareholder Approval (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on April 29, 2013).
3.4	Articles Supplementary for Series E preferred stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the registration statement on Form 8-A, filed by the Company on March 10, 2016).
3.5	Articles Supplementary for Series F preferred stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the registration statement on Form 8-A, filed by the Company on May 16, 2016).
10.1	Fifth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Sunstone Hotel Partnership, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on May 17, 2016).
10.2	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 27, 2017, by and among Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., Sunstone Hotel Partnership, LLC and Marc A. Hoffman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on January 27, 2017).
10.3	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 27, 2017, by and among Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., Sunstone Hotel Partnership, LLC and John V. Arabia (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on January 27, 2017).
10.4	Employment Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2017, by and between Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. and Robert Springer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on January 27, 2017).
10.5	Employment Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2017, by and between Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. and Bryan A. Giglia (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on January 27, 2017).
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document *
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document *
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document *
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document *
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document *
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document *

* Attached as Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are the following materials, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016; (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2017; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016; and (v) Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements that have been detail tagged.

36

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
Date: May 4, 2017	By:	/s/ Bryan A. Giglia
		Bryan A. Giglia (Chief Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)

37

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to

Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John V. Arabia, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

7
Date: May 4, 2017	/s/ John V. Arabia
	John V. Arabia
	President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to

Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Bryan A. Giglia, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

7
Date: May 4, 2017	/s/ Bryan A. Giglia
	Bryan A. Giglia
	Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,  2017, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 4, 2017	/s/ John V. Arabia
	John V. Arabia
	President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 4, 2017	/s/ Bryan A. Giglia
	Bryan A. Giglia
	Chief Financial Officer

XML

Document and Entity Information - shares	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2017	May 01, 2017
Document and Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001295810
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Mar. 31, 2017
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Large Accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		220,463,909
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2017
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 441,830	$ 369,537
Restricted cash	64,414	67,923
Accounts receivable, net	50,229	39,337
Inventories	1,252	1,225
Prepaid expenses	13,252	10,489
Assets held for sale, net		79,113
Total current assets	570,977	567,624
Investment in hotel properties, net	3,149,472	3,158,219
Deferred financing fees, net	2,087	4,002
Other assets, net	9,945	9,389
Total assets	3,732,481	3,739,234
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	36,327	36,110
Accrued payroll and employee benefits	17,078	24,896
Dividends and distributions payable	14,228	119,847
Other current liabilities	43,786	39,869
Current portion of notes payable, net	8,898	184,929
Liabilities of assets held for sale		3,153
Total current liabilities	120,317	408,804
Notes payable, less current portion, net	982,460	746,374
Capital lease obligations, less current portion	15,574	15,574
Other liabilities	36,917	36,650
Total liabilities	1,155,268	1,207,402
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Equity
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 220,417,417 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and 220,073,140 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016	2,204	2,201
Additional paid in capital	2,594,724	2,596,620
Retained earnings	848,736	786,901
Cumulative dividends and distributions	(1,107,180)	(1,092,952)
Total stockholders' equity	2,528,484	2,482,770
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint venture	48,729	49,062
Total equity	2,577,213	2,531,832
Total liabilities and equity	3,732,481	3,739,234
Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
Equity
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock	115,000	115,000
Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
Equity
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock	$ 75,000	$ 75,000

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized (in shares)	100,000,000	100,000,000
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares)	500,000,000	500,000,000
Common stock, shares issued (in shares)	220,417,417	220,073,140
Common stock, shares outstanding (in shares)	220,417,417	220,073,140
Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
Preferred stock, Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, dividend rate (as a percent)	6.95%	6.95%
Preferred stock, Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, shares issued (in shares)	4,600,000	4,600,000
Preferred stock, Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, shares outstanding (in shares)	4,600,000	4,600,000
Preferred stock, Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, liquidation preference (in dollars per share)	$ 25.00	$ 25.00
Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
Preferred stock, Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, dividend rate (as a percent)	6.45%	6.45%
Preferred stock, Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, shares issued (in shares)	3,000,000	3,000,000
Preferred stock, Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, shares outstanding (in shares)	3,000,000	3,000,000
Preferred stock, Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, liquidation preference (in dollars per share)	$ 25.00	$ 25.00

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - USD ($) shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2017	Mar. 31, 2016
REVENUES
Room	$ 190,367	$ 187,297
Food and beverage	75,501	71,234
Other operating	14,875	15,761
Total revenues	280,743	274,292
OPERATING EXPENSES
Room	51,292	51,044
Food and beverage	50,537	51,929
Other operating	3,831	4,056
Advertising and promotion	14,946	14,993
Repairs and maintenance	10,967	11,264
Utilities	7,222	7,514
Franchise costs	8,055	8,096
Property tax, ground lease and insurance	21,287	22,840
Other property-level expenses	34,738	34,713
Corporate overhead	6,779	6,717
Depreciation and amortization	40,807	40,047
Total operating expenses	250,461	253,213
Operating income	30,282	21,079
Interest and other income	721	489
Interest expense	(11,249)	(20,010)
Loss on extinguishment of debt	(4)	(105)
Gain on sale of assets	44,285
Income before income taxes	64,035	1,453
Income tax provision	(208)	(237)
NET INCOME	63,827	1,216
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest	(1,992)	(1,650)
Preferred stock dividends	(3,207)	(2,766)
INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	58,628	(3,200)
Other comprehensive income:
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	63,827	1,216
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS	$ 58,628	$ (3,200)
Basic and diluted per share amounts:
Basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.27	$ (0.02)
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding (in shares)	219,093	212,887
Common stock distributions and distributions payable, per share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.05	$ 0.05

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY - 3 months ended Mar. 31, 2017 - USD ($)	Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock Preferred Stock	Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock Cumulative dividends and distributions	Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock	Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock Preferred Stock	Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock Cumulative dividends and distributions	Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock	Common Stock	Additional Paid In Capital	Retained Earnings	Cumulative dividends and distributions	Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Joint Venture	Total
Beginning Balance at Dec. 31, 2016	$ 115,000,000			$ 75,000,000			$ 2,201,000	$ 2,596,620,000	$ 786,901,000	$ (1,092,952,000)	$ 49,062,000	$ 2,531,832,000
Beginning Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2016	4,600,000			3,000,000			220,073,140
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Deferred stock compensation, net							$ 3,000	(1,896,000)				(1,893,000)
Deferred stock compensation, net (in shares)							344,277
Common stock distributions and distributions payable										(11,021,000)		(11,021,000)
Preferred stock dividends and dividends payable		$ (1,998,000)	$ (1,998,000)		$ (1,209,000)	$ (1,209,000)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest											(2,325,000)	(2,325,000)
Net income									61,835,000		1,992,000	63,827,000
Ending Balance at Mar. 31, 2017	$ 115,000,000			$ 75,000,000			$ 2,204,000	$ 2,594,724,000	$ 848,736,000	$ (1,107,180,000)	$ 48,729,000	$ 2,577,213,000
Ending Balance (in shares) at Mar. 31, 2017	4,600,000			3,000,000			220,417,417

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY (Parenthetical)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2017 $ / shares
Common stock distributions and distributions payable, per share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.05
Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
Preferred stock dividends declared (in dollars per share)	0.434375
Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
Preferred stock dividends declared (in dollars per share)	$ 0.403125

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2017	Mar. 31, 2016
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$ 63,827	$ 1,216
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Bad debt expense	131	109
Gain on sale of assets, net	(44,570)	(7)
Loss on extinguishment of debt	4	105
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net	(657)	6,402
Depreciation	40,150	39,333
Amortization of franchise fees and other intangibles	819	773
Amortization of deferred financing fees	578	555
Amortization of deferred stock compensation	1,749	1,614
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash	4,013	8,176
Accounts receivable	(10,575)	(14,396)
Inventories	5	39
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(2,387)	(1,729)
Accounts payable and other liabilities	(370)	7,691
Accrued payroll and employee benefits	(8,569)	(6,790)
Net cash provided by operating activities	44,148	43,091
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sales of assets	123,117	7
Restricted cash - replacement reserve	(504)	(309)
Renovations and additions to hotel properties	(29,872)	(48,818)
Payment for interest rate derivative	(19)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	92,722	(49,120)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from preferred stock offerings		115,000
Payment of preferred stock offering costs		(4,016)
Repurchase of common stock for employee withholding obligations	(3,793)	(2,641)
Proceeds from notes payable	240,000	100,000
Payments on notes payable	(178,599)	(117,558)
Payments of deferred financing costs	(13)	(78)
Dividends and distributions paid	(119,847)	(186,301)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest	(2,325)	(775)
Net cash used in financing activities	(64,577)	(96,369)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	72,293	(102,398)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	369,537	499,067
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	441,830	396,669
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid for interest	9,632	12,455
Cash paid for income taxes	38	204
NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITY
Increase in accounts payable related to renovations and additions to hotel properties and other assets	2,119	5,844
Amortization of deferred stock compensation - construction activities	151	239
NONCASH FINANCING ACTIVITY
Issuance of common stock distributions		78,823
Dividends and distributions payable	$ 14,228	$ 13,592

XML

Organization and Description of Business

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Organization and Description of Business

Organization and Description of Business

1. Organization and Description of Business

Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Maryland on June 28, 2004 in anticipation of an initial public offering of common stock, which was consummated on October 26, 2004. The Company, through its 100% controlling interest in Sunstone Hotel Partnership, LLC (the “Operating Partnership”), of which the Company is the sole managing member, and the subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, including Sunstone Hotel TRS Lessee, Inc. (the “TRS Lessee”) and its subsidiaries, is currently engaged in acquiring, owning, asset managing and renovating hotel properties. The Company may also sell certain hotel properties from time to time. The Company operates as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes.

As a REIT, certain tax laws limit the amount of “non-qualifying” income the Company can earn, including income derived directly from the operation of hotels. The Company leases all of its hotels to its TRS Lessee, which in turn enters into long-term management agreements with third parties to manage the operations of the Company’s hotels, in transactions that are intended to generate qualifying income. As of March 31, 2017, the Company had interests in 27 hotels (the “27 hotels”), and the Company’s third-party managers included the following:

	Number of Hotels
Subsidiaries of Marriott International, Inc. or Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. (collectively, “Marriott”)	11
Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Inc.	5
Highgate Hotels L.P. and an affiliate	3
Crestline Hotels & Resorts	2
Hilton Worldwide	2
Hyatt Corporation	2
Davidson Hotels & Resorts	1
HEI Hotels & Resorts	1
Total hotels held for investment	27

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, the TRS Lessee and their subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. If the Company determines that it has an interest in a variable interest entity within the meaning of the Consolidation Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), the Company will consolidate the entity when it is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the entity. Based on its review, the Company determined that all of its subsidiaries were properly consolidated as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Noncontrolling interest at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 represents the outside 25.0% equity interest in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront, which the Company includes in its financial statements on a consolidated basis.

The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the Company’s opinion, the interim financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments, consisting solely of normal and recurring adjustments, which are necessary to fairly present the interim financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23, 2017.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of these financial statements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Earnings Per Share

The Company applies the two-class method when computing its earnings per share. As required by the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC, the net income per share for each class of stock (common stock and convertible preferred stock) is calculated assuming all of the Company’s net income is distributed as dividends to each class of stock based on their contractual rights. To the extent the Company has undistributed earnings in any calendar quarter, the Company will follow the two-class method of computing earnings per share.

The Company follows the requirements of the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are considered participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.

In accordance with the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC, basic earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period, plus potential common shares considered outstanding during the period, as long as the inclusion of such awards is not anti-dilutive. Potential common shares consist of unvested restricted stock awards and the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, using the more dilutive of either the two-class method or the treasury stock method.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Numerator:
Net income	$	63,827	$	1,216
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest		(1,992)		(1,650)
Preferred stock dividends		(3,207)		(2,766)
Distributions paid on unvested restricted stock compensation		(60)		(60)
Undistributed income allocated to unvested restricted stock compensation		(248)		—
Numerator for basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	58,320	$	(3,260)
Denominator:
Weighted average basic and diluted common shares outstanding		219,093		212,887
Basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share	$	0.27	$	(0.02)

The Company’s unvested restricted shares associated with its long-term incentive plan and shares associated with common stock options have been excluded from the above calculation of earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

New Accounting Standards and Accounting Changes

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU No. 2014-09”). The core principle of ASU No. 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity will need to apply a five-step model: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU No. 2014-09 was originally to be effective during the first quarter of 2017; however, the FASB issued a one-year deferral so that it now becomes effective during the first quarter of 2018. ASU No. 2014-09 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.

In March 2016, the FASB clarified the principal versus agent guidance in ASU No. 2014-09 with its issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)” (“ASU No. 2016-08”). In particular, ASU No. 2016-08 clarifies how an entity should identify the unit of accounting for the principal versus agent evaluation and how it should apply the control principle to certain types of arrangements, such as service transactions by explaining what a principal controls before the specified good or service is transferred to the customer. In addition, ASU No. 2016-08 reframes the indicators to focus on evidence that an entity is acting as a principal rather than as an agent. ASU No. 2016-08 will become effective, along with ASU No. 2014-09, during the first quarter of 2018. Similar to ASU No. 2014-09, ASU No. 2016-08 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.

In May 2016, the FASB amended ASU No. 2014-09’s guidance on transition, collectability, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes with its issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients” (“ASU No. 2016-12”). The amendments clarify that, for a contract to be considered completed at transition, all (or substantially all) of the revenue must have been recognized under legacy GAAP. This clarification is important because entities that use the modified retrospective transition approach need to apply the standard only to contracts that are not complete as of the date of initial application, and entities that use the full retrospective approach may apply certain practical expedients to completed contracts. In addition, ASU No. 2016-12 clarifies that an entity should consider the probability of collecting substantially all of the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for goods and services expected to be transferred to the customer rather than the total amount promised for all the goods or services in the contract. ASU No. 2016-12 also clarifies that an entity may consider its ability to manage its exposure to credit risk as part of the collectability assessment, as well as that the fair value of noncash consideration should be measured at contract inception when determining the transaction price. Finally, ASU No. 2016-12 allows an entity to make an accounting policy election to exclude from the transaction price certain types of taxes collected from a customer if it discloses that policy. ASU No. 2016-12 will become effective, along with ASU No. 2014-09, during the first quarter of 2018. Similar to ASU No. 2014-09, ASU No. 2016-12 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.

The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2014-09, along with the related clarifications and amendments in ASU No. 2016-08 and ASU No. 2016-12, will have on its recognition of revenue included in its consolidated financial statements. While the Company is still evaluating the impact that the ASUs will have on accounting for the gain recognized upon the sale of a hotel, there is a possibility that the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 will affect the timing of any gain recognition in the consolidated financial statements. For example, under current guidance, a gain on the sale of hotel properties with contingencies and some future involvement is deferred until all contingencies have been removed. Under the new guidance, however, the entire gain on sale may be recognized upon the close of escrow. The Company expects to adopt the new ASUs under the modified retrospective approach.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU No. 2016-02”), which will require lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses in the income statement in a manner similar to today’s accounting. The guidance also eliminates today’s real estate-specific provisions and changes the guidance on sale-leaseback transactions, initial direct costs and lease executory costs for all entities. For lessors, the standard modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. All entities will classify leases to determine how to recognize lease-related revenue and expense. Classification will continue to affect amounts that lessors record on the balance sheet. ASU No. 2016-02 will become effective during the first quarter of 2019, and will require a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements, and, other than the inclusion of operating leases on the Company’s balance sheet, such effects have not yet been determined.

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU No. 2016-13”), which will replace today’s “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized cost. For trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and other instruments, entities will be required to use a new forward looking “expected loss” model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for losses. In addition, entities will have to disclose significantly more information, including information they use to track credit quality by year of origination for most financing receivables. ASU No. 2016-13 will become effective during the first quarter of 2020. ASU No. 2016-13 will require a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted during the first quarter of 2019. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2016-13 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU No. 2016-15”), which clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-15 addresses certain issues where diversity in practice was identified. It amends existing guidance, which is principles based and often requires judgment to determine the appropriate classification of cash flows as operating, investing or financing activities. In addition, ASU No. 2016-15 clarifies how the predominance principle should be applied when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-15 will become effective during the first quarter of 2018, and will generally require a retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2016-15 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU No. 2016-18”), which will require entities to show the changes in total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. When cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are presented in more than one line item on the balance sheet, the new guidance requires a reconciliation of the totals in the statement of cash flows to the related caption in the balance sheet. This reconciliation can be presented either on the face of the statement of cash flows or in the notes to the financial statements. ASU No. 2016-18 will become effective in the first quarter of 2018, and will require a retrospective approach. Early adoption in an interim period is permitted, but any adjustments must be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes the interim period. Upon adoption of this standard, amounts included in restricted cash on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets will be included with cash and cash equivalents on its consolidated statements of cash flows. These amounts totaled $64.4 million and $67.9 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The adoption of this standard will not change the Company’s balance sheet presentation.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU No. 2017-01”), which changes the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. Under the new guidance, an entity first determines whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. If this threshold is met, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. If it is not met, the entity then evaluates whether the set meets the requirement that a business include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. ASU No. 2017-01 will become effective in the first quarter of 2018, and the guidance is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. Once adopted, the Company will be required to analyze future hotel acquisitions to determine if the transaction qualifies as the purchase of a business or an asset. Transaction costs associated with asset acquisitions will be capitalized, while the same costs associated with a business combination will continue to be expensed as incurred. In addition, asset acquisitions will not be subject to a measurement period, as are business combinations. Depending on the Company’s conclusion, ASU No. 2017-01 may have an effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU No. 2017-04”), which eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill (i.e., Step 2 of today’s goodwill impairment test) to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Under the new guidance, if a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard does not change the guidance on completing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. An entity will still be able to perform today’s optional qualitative goodwill impairment assessment before determining whether to proceed to Step 1. ASU No. 2017-04 will become effective in the first quarter of 2019, and the guidance is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2017-04 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Noncontrolling Interest

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include an entity in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Noncontrolling interest is the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. Such noncontrolling interest is reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity. On the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from the less-than-wholly-owned subsidiary is reported at the consolidated amount, including both the amounts attributable to the Company and the noncontrolling interest. Income or loss is allocated to the noncontrolling interest based on its weighted average ownership percentage for the applicable period. The consolidated statement of equity includes beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for each component of stockholders’ equity, noncontrolling interest and total equity.

At both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the noncontrolling interest reported in the Company’s financial statements included the 25.0% outside ownership in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront.

Segment Reporting

The Company considers each of its hotels to be an operating segment, none of which meets the threshold for a separate reportable segment in accordance with the Segment Reporting Topic of the FASB ASC. Currently, the Company operates in one segment, hotel ownership.

XML

Investment in Hotel Properties

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Investment in Hotel Properties

Investment in Hotel Properties

3. Investment in Hotel Properties

Investment in hotel properties, net consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Land	$	531,660	$	531,660
Buildings and improvements		3,174,081		3,135,806
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		522,806		512,372
Intangible assets		48,759		49,015
Franchise fees		1,021		1,021
Construction in process		48,856		65,449
Investment in hotel properties, gross		4,327,183		4,295,323
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(1,177,711)		(1,137,104)
Investment in hotel properties, net	$	3,149,472	$	3,158,219

XML

Disposals

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Disposals

Disposals

4. Disposals

In February 2017, the Company sold the 444-room Fairmont Newport Beach located in Newport Beach, California for net proceeds of $122.8 million. The Company recognized a net gain on the sale of $44.3 million. The sale did not represent a strategic shift that had a major impact on the Company’s business plan or its primary markets, and therefore, the sale of the hotel did not qualify as a discontinued operation. The Company classified the assets and liabilities of the Fairmont Newport Beach as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2016
Accounts receivable, net	$	452
Inventories		126
Prepaid expenses		386
Investment in hotel property, net		77,971
Other assets, net		178
Assets held for sale, net	$	79,113
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	781
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		751
Other current liabilities		1,473
Other liabilities		148
Liabilities of assets held for sale	$	3,153

The following table provides summary results of operations for the Fairmont Newport Beach, as well as the Sheraton Cerritos that was sold during 2016,  both of which are included in continuing operations (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Revenues	$	3,541	$	11,248
Income before income taxes	$	1,019	$	1,347
Gain on sale of assets	$	44,285	$	—

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives

Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives

5. Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the carrying amount of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses were representative of their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.

The Company follows the requirements of the Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Topic of the FASB ASC, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value and disclosing fair value measurements by establishing a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1	Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2	Inputs reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or the liability; or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3	Unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions incorporated in valuation techniques used to determine fair value. These assumptions are required to be consistent with market participant assumptions that are reasonably available.

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the only financial instruments that the Company measures at fair value are its interest rate derivatives, along with a life insurance policy and a related retirement benefit agreement. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company estimates the fair value of its interest rate derivatives using Level 2 measurements based on quotes obtained from the counterparties, which are based upon the consideration that would be required to terminate the agreements. Both the life insurance policy and the related retirement benefit agreement, which are for a former Company associate, are valued using Level 2 measurements.

The following table presents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):

			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
March 31, 2017 (unaudited):
Interest rate cap derivatives	$	4	$	—	$	4	$	—
Interest rate swap derivatives		2,421		—		2,421		—
Life insurance policy (1)		855		—		855		—
Total assets measured at fair value at March 31, 2017	$	3,280	$	—	$	3,280	$	—
December 31, 2016:
Interest rate cap derivative	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Interest rate swap derivatives		1,749		—		1,749		—
Life insurance policy (1)		861		—		861		—
Total assets measured at fair value at December 31, 2016	$	2,610	$	—	$	2,610	$	—

(1) Includes the split life insurance policy for a former Company associate. These amounts are included in other assets, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, and will be used to reimburse the Company for payments made to the former associate from the related retirement benefit agreement, which is included in accrued payroll and employee benefits on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The following table presents the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):

			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
March 31, 2017 (unaudited):
Retirement benefit agreement (1)	$	855	$	—	$	855	$	—
Total liabilities measured at fair value at March 31, 2017	$	855	$	—	$	855	$	—
December 31, 2016:
Retirement benefit agreement (1)	$	861	$	—	$	861	$	—
Total liabilities measured at fair value at December 31, 2016	$	861	$	—	$	861	$	—

(1) Includes the retirement benefit agreement for a former Company associate. The agreement calls for the balance of the retirement benefit to be paid out to the former associate in ten annual installments, beginning in 2011. As such, the Company has paid the former associate a total of $1.2 million through March 31, 2017, which was reimbursed to the Company using funds from the related split life insurance policy noted above. These amounts are included in accrued payroll and employee benefits on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Interest Rate Derivatives

The Company’s interest rate derivatives, which are not designated as effective cash flow hedges, consisted of the following at March 31, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):

									Estimated Fair Value Asset
		Strike / Capped			Effective	Maturity	Notional		March 31,		December 31,
Hedged Debt	Type	Rate		Index	Date	Date	Amount		2017		2016
Hilton San Diego Bayfront (1)	Cap	4.250	%	1-Month LIBOR	April 15, 2015	May 1, 2017	$	110,772	$	—	$	—
Hilton San Diego Bayfront (1)	Cap	4.250	%	1-Month LIBOR	May 1, 2017	May 1, 2019	$	N/A		4		—
$85.0 million term loan (2)	Swap	3.391	%	1-Month LIBOR	October 29, 2015	September 2, 2022	$	85,000		1,610		1,336
$100.0 million term loan (3)	Swap	3.653	%	1-Month LIBOR	January 29, 2016	January 31, 2023	$	100,000		811		413
									$	2,425	$	1,749

(1) In March 2017, the Company purchased a new interest rate cap agreement for $19,000 related to the loan secured by the Hilton San Diego Bayfront. The new agreement, whose terms are substantially the same as the terms under the old cap agreement, will effectively replace the old agreement on May 1, 2017. The fair values of both Hilton San Diego Bayfront cap agreements are included in other assets, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

(2) The fair value of the $85.0 million term loan swap agreement is included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The 1-month LIBOR rate was swapped to a fixed rate of 1.591%.

(3) The fair value of the $100.0 million term loan swap agreement is included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The 1-month LIBOR rate was swapped to a fixed rate of 1.853%.

Noncash changes in the fair values of the Company’s interest rate derivatives resulted in (decreases) increases to interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net	$	(657)	$	6,402

Fair Value of Debt

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016,  77.8% and 76.2%, respectively, of the Company’s outstanding debt had fixed interest rates, including the effects of interest rate swap agreements. The Company’s principal value of its consolidated debt totaled $1.0 billion and $0.9 billion as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Using Level 3 measurements, the Company estimates that the fair market value of its debt totaled $1.0 billion and $0.9 billion as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

XML

Other Assets

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Other Assets

Other Assets

6. Other Assets

Other assets, net consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Property and equipment, net	$	699	$	779
Goodwill		990		990
Deferred expense on straight-lined third-party tenant leases		2,853		2,876
Interest rate derivatives		2,425		1,749
Other receivables		1,491		1,673
Other		1,487		1,322
Total other assets net	$	9,945	$	9,389

The property and equipment, net noted above consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Cost basis	$	10,843	$	10,807
Accumulated depreciation		(10,144)		(10,028)
Property and equipment, net	$	699	$	779

XML

Notes Payable

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Notes Payable

Notes Payable

7. Notes Payable

Notes payable consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Notes payable requiring payments of interest and principal, with fixed rates ranging from 4.12% to 5.95%; maturing at dates ranging from November 2020 through January 2025. The notes are collateralized by first deeds of trust on four hotel properties at March 31, 2017, and five hotel properties at December 31, 2016.	$	350,802	$	528,604
Note payable requiring payments of interest and principal, bearing a blended rate of one-month LIBOR plus 225 basis points; maturing in August 2019. The note is collateralized by a first deed of trust on one hotel property.		221,544		222,340
Unsecured term loan requiring payments of interest only, with a blended interest rate based on a pricing grid with a range of 180 to 255 basis points over LIBOR, depending on the Company's leverage ratios. LIBOR has been swapped to a fixed rate of 1.591%, resulting in an effective interest rate of 3.391% based on the Company's current leverage. Matures in September 2022.		85,000		85,000
Unsecured term loan requiring payments of interest only, with a blended interest rate based on a pricing grid with a range of 180 to 255 basis points over LIBOR, depending on the Company's leverage ratios. LIBOR has been swapped to a fixed rate of 1.853%, resulting in an effective interest rate of 3.653% based on the Company's current leverage. Matures in January 2023.		100,000		100,000
Unsecured Series A Senior Notes requiring semi-annual payments of interest only, bearing interest at 4.69%; maturing in January 2026.		120,000		—
Unsecured Series B Senior Notes requiring semi-annual payments of interest only, bearing interest at 4.79%; maturing in January 2028.		120,000		—
Total notes payable	$	997,346	$	935,944
Current portion of notes payable	$	10,167	$	186,034
Less: current portion of deferred financing fees		(1,269)		(1,105)
Carrying value of current portion of notes payable	$	8,898	$	184,929
Notes payable, less current portion	$	987,179	$	749,910
Less: long-term portion of deferred financing fees		(4,719)		(3,536)
Carrying value of notes payable, less current portion	$	982,460	$	746,374

Notes Payable Transactions - 2017

In January 2017, the Company received proceeds of $240.0 million in a private placement of senior unsecured notes. The private placement consisted of $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.69%, maturing in January 2026 (the “Series A Senior Notes”), and $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.79%, maturing in January 2028 (the “Series B Senior Notes”, together the “Senior Notes”).

In January 2017, the Company used proceeds received from the Senior Notes to repay the loan secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf, which had a balance of $176.0 million and an interest rate of 5.58%. The Marriott Boston Long Wharf loan was scheduled to mature in April 2017, and was available to be repaid without penalty in January 2017.

Interest Expense

Total interest incurred and expensed on the notes payable was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations	$	11,328	$	13,053
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net		(657)		6,402
Amortization of deferred financing fees		578		555
Total interest expense	$	11,249	$	20,010

XML

Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities

Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities

8. Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities

Other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Property, sales and use taxes payable	$	16,436	$	16,965
Income tax payable		382		211
Accrued interest		3,568		1,996
Advance deposits		17,820		14,505
Management fees payable		1,140		1,645
Other		4,440		4,547
Total other current liabilities	$	43,786	$	39,869

Other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Deferred gain on sale of asset	$	7,000	$	7,000
Deferred revenue		6,149		6,045
Deferred rent		19,748		19,807
Deferred incentive management fees		201		—
Other		3,819		3,798
Total other liabilities	$	36,917	$	36,650

XML

Stockholders' Equity

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Stockholders' Equity

Stockholders' Equity

9. Stockholders’ Equity

Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

In March 2016, the Company issued 4,600,000 shares of its 6.95% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series E preferred stock”) with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share for gross proceeds of $115.0 million. In conjunction with the offering, the Company incurred $4.0 million in preferred offering costs. On or after March 11, 2021, the Series E preferred stock will be redeemable at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends up to, but not including, the redemption date.

Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

In May 2016, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of its 6.45% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series F preferred stock) with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share for gross proceeds of $75.0 million. In conjunction with the offering, the Company incurred $2.6 million in preferred offering costs. On or after May 17, 2021, the Series F preferred stock will be redeemable at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends up to, but not including, the redemption date.

Common Stock

In February 2017, the Company entered into separate “At the Market” Agreements (the “ATM Agreements”) with each of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.  In accordance with the terms of the ATM Agreements, the Company may from time to time offer and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $300.0 million. The Company did not issue any shares of its common stock in connection with the ATM Agreements during the three months ended March 31, 2017. As of March 31, 2017, the Company has $300.0 million available for sale under the ATM Agreements.

In February 2017, the Company’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase plan to acquire up to $300.0 million of the Company’s common and preferred stock. As of March 31, 2017, no shares of either the Company’s common or preferred stock have been repurchased. Future purchases will depend on various factors, including the Company’s capital needs, as well as the Company’s common and preferred stock price.

XML

Long-Term Incentive Plan

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Long-Term Incentive Plan

Long-Term Incentive Plan

10. Long-Term Incentive Plan

Stock Grants

Restricted shares granted pursuant to the Company’s 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 1, 2014, generally vest over periods from three to five years from the date of grant.

Compensation expense related to awards of restricted shares are measured at fair value on the date of grant and amortized over the relevant requisite service period or derived service period.

In accordance with the Compensation Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur.  The Company’s amortization expense and forfeitures related to restricted shares for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Amortization expense, including forfeitures	$	1,749	$	1,614

In addition, the Company capitalizes compensation costs related to all restricted shares granted to certain employees who work on the design and construction of its hotels. During both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, these capitalized costs totaled $0.2 million.

Stock Options

In April 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s board of directors approved a grant of 200,000 non-qualified stock options (the “Options”) to one of the Company’s former associates. The Options fully vested in April 2009, and will expire in April 2018. The exercise price of the Options is $17.71 per share.

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Management Agreements

Management agreements with the Company’s third-party hotel managers require the Company to pay between 1.75% and 3.5% of total revenue of the managed hotels to the third-party managers each month as a basic management fee. In addition to basic management fees, provided that certain operating thresholds are met, the Company may also be required to pay incentive management fees to certain of its third-party managers. Total basic management fees, net of key money incentives received from third-party hotel managers, along with incentive management fees incurred by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were included in other property-level expenses on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Basic management fees	$	7,895	$	7,667
Incentive management fees		2,553		1,704
Total basic and incentive management fees	$	10,448	$	9,371

License and Franchise Agreements

The Company has entered into license and franchise agreements related to certain of its hotel properties. The license and franchise agreements require the Company to, among other things, pay monthly fees that are calculated based on specified percentages of certain revenues. The license and franchise agreements generally contain specific standards for, and restrictions and limitations on, the operation and maintenance of the hotels which are established by the franchisors to maintain uniformity in the system created by each such franchisor. Such standards generally regulate the appearance of the hotel, quality and type of goods and services offered, signage and protection of trademarks. Compliance with such standards may from time to time require the Company to make significant expenditures for capital improvements.

Total license and franchise fees incurred by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were included in franchise costs on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Franchise assessments (1)	$	5,927	$	5,813
Franchise royalties		2,128		2,283
Total franchise costs	$	8,055	$	8,096

(1) Includes advertising, reservation and frequent guest club assessments.

Renovation and Construction Commitments

At March 31, 2017, the Company had various contracts outstanding with third parties in connection with the renovation and repositioning of certain of its hotel properties. The remaining commitments under these contracts at March 31, 2017 totaled $46.1 million.

Capital Leases

The Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile is subject to a building lease which expires in December 2097. Upon acquisition of the hotel in June 2012, the Company evaluated the terms of the lease agreement and determined the lease to be a capital lease pursuant to the Leases Topic of the FASB ASC.

The capital lease asset was included in investment in hotel properties, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as follows (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Gross capital lease asset - buildings and improvements	$	58,799	$	58,799
Accumulated depreciation		(7,105)		(6,738)
Net capital lease asset - buildings and improvements	$	51,694	$	52,061

Future minimum lease payments under the Company’s capital lease together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of March 31, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):

2017	$	1,403
2018		1,403
2019		1,403
2020		1,403
2021		1,403
Thereafter		106,257
Total minimum lease payments (1)		113,272
Less: Amount representing interest (2)		(97,697)
Present value of net minimum lease payments (3)	$	15,575

(1) Minimum lease payments do not include percentage rent which may be paid under the Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile building lease on the basis of 4.0% of the hotel’s gross room revenues over a certain threshold. No percentage rent was due during either the three months ended March 31, 2017 or 2016.  

(2) Interest includes the amount necessary to reduce net minimum lease payments to present value calculated at the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at lease inception.

(3) The present value of net minimum lease payments are presented on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2017 as a current obligation of $1,000, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses, and as a long-term obligation of $15.6 million, which is included in capital lease obligations, less current portion.

Ground, Building and Air Leases

Total rent expense incurred pursuant to ground, building and air lease agreements for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was included in property tax, ground lease and insurance on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Minimum rent, including straight-line adjustments	$	2,340	$	2,396
Percentage rent (1)		1,585		2,060
Total	$	3,925	$	4,456

(1) Several of the Company’s hotels pay percentage rent, which is calculated on operating revenues above certain thresholds.

Rent expense incurred pursuant to a lease on the corporate facility totaled $0.1 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, and is included in corporate overhead expense.

Concentration of Risk

The concentration of the Company’s hotels in California, Illinois, Massachusetts and the greater Washington DC area exposes the Company’s business to economic conditions, competition and real and personal property tax rates unique to these locales. As of March 31, 2017,  16 of the Company’s 27 hotels were concentrated in California, Illinois, Massachusetts and the greater Washington DC area as follows:

							Greater
							Washington DC
	California		Illinois		Massachusetts		Area
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Number of hotels	7		3		3		3
Percentage of total rooms	29	%	9	%	15	%	14	%
Percentage of total consolidated revenue during the past 12 months	34	%	7	%	15	%	14	%

Other

The Company has provided customary unsecured environmental indemnities to certain lenders. The Company has performed due diligence on the potential environmental risks, including obtaining an independent environmental review from outside environmental consultants. These indemnities obligate the Company to reimburse the indemnified parties for damages related to certain environmental matters. There is no term or damage limitation on these indemnities; however, if an environmental matter arises, the Company could have recourse against other previous owners or a claim against its environmental insurance policies.

At March 31, 2017, the Company had $0.5 million of outstanding irrevocable letters of credit to guaranty the Company’s financial obligations related to workers’ compensation insurance programs from prior policy years. The beneficiaries of these letters of credit may draw upon these letters of credit in the event of a contractual default by the Company relating to each respective obligation. No draws have been made through March 31, 2017.

The Company is subject to various claims, lawsuits and legal proceedings, including routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, regarding the operation of its hotels and Company matters. While it is not possible to ascertain the ultimate outcome of such matters, the Company believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts covered by insurance will not have a material adverse impact on its financial condition or results of operations. The outcome of claims, lawsuits and legal proceedings brought against the Company, however, is subject to significant uncertainties.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, the TRS Lessee and their subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. If the Company determines that it has an interest in a variable interest entity within the meaning of the Consolidation Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), the Company will consolidate the entity when it is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the entity. Based on its review, the Company determined that all of its subsidiaries were properly consolidated as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Noncontrolling interest at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 represents the outside 25.0% equity interest in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront, which the Company includes in its financial statements on a consolidated basis.

The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the Company’s opinion, the interim financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments, consisting solely of normal and recurring adjustments, which are necessary to fairly present the interim financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23, 2017.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of these financial statements.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Earnings Per Share

Earnings Per Share

The Company applies the two-class method when computing its earnings per share. As required by the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC, the net income per share for each class of stock (common stock and convertible preferred stock) is calculated assuming all of the Company’s net income is distributed as dividends to each class of stock based on their contractual rights. To the extent the Company has undistributed earnings in any calendar quarter, the Company will follow the two-class method of computing earnings per share.

The Company follows the requirements of the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are considered participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.

In accordance with the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC, basic earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period, plus potential common shares considered outstanding during the period, as long as the inclusion of such awards is not anti-dilutive. Potential common shares consist of unvested restricted stock awards and the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, using the more dilutive of either the two-class method or the treasury stock method.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Numerator:
Net income	$	63,827	$	1,216
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest		(1,992)		(1,650)
Preferred stock dividends		(3,207)		(2,766)
Distributions paid on unvested restricted stock compensation		(60)		(60)
Undistributed income allocated to unvested restricted stock compensation		(248)		—
Numerator for basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	58,320	$	(3,260)
Denominator:
Weighted average basic and diluted common shares outstanding		219,093		212,887
Basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share	$	0.27	$	(0.02)

The Company’s unvested restricted shares associated with its long-term incentive plan and shares associated with common stock options have been excluded from the above calculation of earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

New Accounting Standards and Accounting Changes

New Accounting Standards and Accounting Changes

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU No. 2014-09”). The core principle of ASU No. 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity will need to apply a five-step model: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU No. 2014-09 was originally to be effective during the first quarter of 2017; however, the FASB issued a one-year deferral so that it now becomes effective during the first quarter of 2018. ASU No. 2014-09 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.

In March 2016, the FASB clarified the principal versus agent guidance in ASU No. 2014-09 with its issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)” (“ASU No. 2016-08”). In particular, ASU No. 2016-08 clarifies how an entity should identify the unit of accounting for the principal versus agent evaluation and how it should apply the control principle to certain types of arrangements, such as service transactions by explaining what a principal controls before the specified good or service is transferred to the customer. In addition, ASU No. 2016-08 reframes the indicators to focus on evidence that an entity is acting as a principal rather than as an agent. ASU No. 2016-08 will become effective, along with ASU No. 2014-09, during the first quarter of 2018. Similar to ASU No. 2014-09, ASU No. 2016-08 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.

In May 2016, the FASB amended ASU No. 2014-09’s guidance on transition, collectability, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes with its issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients” (“ASU No. 2016-12”). The amendments clarify that, for a contract to be considered completed at transition, all (or substantially all) of the revenue must have been recognized under legacy GAAP. This clarification is important because entities that use the modified retrospective transition approach need to apply the standard only to contracts that are not complete as of the date of initial application, and entities that use the full retrospective approach may apply certain practical expedients to completed contracts. In addition, ASU No. 2016-12 clarifies that an entity should consider the probability of collecting substantially all of the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for goods and services expected to be transferred to the customer rather than the total amount promised for all the goods or services in the contract. ASU No. 2016-12 also clarifies that an entity may consider its ability to manage its exposure to credit risk as part of the collectability assessment, as well as that the fair value of noncash consideration should be measured at contract inception when determining the transaction price. Finally, ASU No. 2016-12 allows an entity to make an accounting policy election to exclude from the transaction price certain types of taxes collected from a customer if it discloses that policy. ASU No. 2016-12 will become effective, along with ASU No. 2014-09, during the first quarter of 2018. Similar to ASU No. 2014-09, ASU No. 2016-12 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.

The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2014-09, along with the related clarifications and amendments in ASU No. 2016-08 and ASU No. 2016-12, will have on its recognition of revenue included in its consolidated financial statements. While the Company is still evaluating the impact that the ASUs will have on accounting for the gain recognized upon the sale of a hotel, there is a possibility that the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 will affect the timing of any gain recognition in the consolidated financial statements. For example, under current guidance, a gain on the sale of hotel properties with contingencies and some future involvement is deferred until all contingencies have been removed. Under the new guidance, however, the entire gain on sale may be recognized upon the close of escrow. The Company expects to adopt the new ASUs under the modified retrospective approach.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU No. 2016-02”), which will require lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses in the income statement in a manner similar to today’s accounting. The guidance also eliminates today’s real estate-specific provisions and changes the guidance on sale-leaseback transactions, initial direct costs and lease executory costs for all entities. For lessors, the standard modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. All entities will classify leases to determine how to recognize lease-related revenue and expense. Classification will continue to affect amounts that lessors record on the balance sheet. ASU No. 2016-02 will become effective during the first quarter of 2019, and will require a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements, and, other than the inclusion of operating leases on the Company’s balance sheet, such effects have not yet been determined.

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU No. 2016-13”), which will replace today’s “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized cost. For trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and other instruments, entities will be required to use a new forward looking “expected loss” model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for losses. In addition, entities will have to disclose significantly more information, including information they use to track credit quality by year of origination for most financing receivables. ASU No. 2016-13 will become effective during the first quarter of 2020. ASU No. 2016-13 will require a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted during the first quarter of 2019. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2016-13 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU No. 2016-15”), which clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-15 addresses certain issues where diversity in practice was identified. It amends existing guidance, which is principles based and often requires judgment to determine the appropriate classification of cash flows as operating, investing or financing activities. In addition, ASU No. 2016-15 clarifies how the predominance principle should be applied when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-15 will become effective during the first quarter of 2018, and will generally require a retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2016-15 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU No. 2016-18”), which will require entities to show the changes in total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. When cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are presented in more than one line item on the balance sheet, the new guidance requires a reconciliation of the totals in the statement of cash flows to the related caption in the balance sheet. This reconciliation can be presented either on the face of the statement of cash flows or in the notes to the financial statements. ASU No. 2016-18 will become effective in the first quarter of 2018, and will require a retrospective approach. Early adoption in an interim period is permitted, but any adjustments must be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes the interim period. Upon adoption of this standard, amounts included in restricted cash on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets will be included with cash and cash equivalents on its consolidated statements of cash flows. These amounts totaled $64.4 million and $67.9 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The adoption of this standard will not change the Company’s balance sheet presentation.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU No. 2017-01”), which changes the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. Under the new guidance, an entity first determines whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. If this threshold is met, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. If it is not met, the entity then evaluates whether the set meets the requirement that a business include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. ASU No. 2017-01 will become effective in the first quarter of 2018, and the guidance is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. Once adopted, the Company will be required to analyze future hotel acquisitions to determine if the transaction qualifies as the purchase of a business or an asset. Transaction costs associated with asset acquisitions will be capitalized, while the same costs associated with a business combination will continue to be expensed as incurred. In addition, asset acquisitions will not be subject to a measurement period, as are business combinations. Depending on the Company’s conclusion, ASU No. 2017-01 may have an effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU No. 2017-04”), which eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill (i.e., Step 2 of today’s goodwill impairment test) to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Under the new guidance, if a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard does not change the guidance on completing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. An entity will still be able to perform today’s optional qualitative goodwill impairment assessment before determining whether to proceed to Step 1. ASU No. 2017-04 will become effective in the first quarter of 2019, and the guidance is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2017-04 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Noncontrolling Interest

Noncontrolling Interest

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include an entity in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Noncontrolling interest is the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. Such noncontrolling interest is reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity. On the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from the less-than-wholly-owned subsidiary is reported at the consolidated amount, including both the amounts attributable to the Company and the noncontrolling interest. Income or loss is allocated to the noncontrolling interest based on its weighted average ownership percentage for the applicable period. The consolidated statement of equity includes beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for each component of stockholders’ equity, noncontrolling interest and total equity.

At both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the noncontrolling interest reported in the Company’s financial statements included the 25.0% outside ownership in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront.

Segment Reporting

Segment Reporting

The Company considers each of its hotels to be an operating segment, none of which meets the threshold for a separate reportable segment in accordance with the Segment Reporting Topic of the FASB ASC. Currently, the Company operates in one segment, hotel ownership.

XML

Organization and Description of Business (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Organization and Description of Business

Schedule of number of hotels managed by each third-party manager

	Number of Hotels
Subsidiaries of Marriott International, Inc. or Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. (collectively, “Marriott”)	11
Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Inc.	5
Highgate Hotels L.P. and an affiliate	3
Crestline Hotels & Resorts	2
Hilton Worldwide	2
Hyatt Corporation	2
Davidson Hotels & Resorts	1
HEI Hotels & Resorts	1
Total hotels held for investment	27

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Schedule of computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Numerator:
Net income	$	63,827	$	1,216
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest		(1,992)		(1,650)
Preferred stock dividends		(3,207)		(2,766)
Distributions paid on unvested restricted stock compensation		(60)		(60)
Undistributed income allocated to unvested restricted stock compensation		(248)		—
Numerator for basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	58,320	$	(3,260)
Denominator:
Weighted average basic and diluted common shares outstanding		219,093		212,887
Basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share	$	0.27	$	(0.02)

XML

Investment in Hotel Properties (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Investment in Hotel Properties

Schedule of investment in hotel properties

Investment in hotel properties, net consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Land	$	531,660	$	531,660
Buildings and improvements		3,174,081		3,135,806
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		522,806		512,372
Intangible assets		48,759		49,015
Franchise fees		1,021		1,021
Construction in process		48,856		65,449
Investment in hotel properties, gross		4,327,183		4,295,323
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(1,177,711)		(1,137,104)
Investment in hotel properties, net	$	3,149,472	$	3,158,219

XML

Disposals (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Disposals

Schedule of amounts held for sale

The Company classified the assets and liabilities of the Fairmont Newport Beach as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2016
Accounts receivable, net	$	452
Inventories		126
Prepaid expenses		386
Investment in hotel property, net		77,971
Other assets, net		178
Assets held for sale, net	$	79,113
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	781
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		751
Other current liabilities		1,473
Other liabilities		148
Liabilities of assets held for sale	$	3,153

Schedule of operating results for sold entities

The following table provides summary results of operations for the Fairmont Newport Beach, as well as the Sheraton Cerritos that was sold during 2016,  both of which are included in continuing operations (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Revenues	$	3,541	$	11,248
Income before income taxes	$	1,019	$	1,347
Gain on sale of assets	$	44,285	$	—

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives

Schedule of assets measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis

The following table presents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):

			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
March 31, 2017 (unaudited):
Interest rate cap derivatives	$	4	$	—	$	4	$	—
Interest rate swap derivatives		2,421		—		2,421		—
Life insurance policy (1)		855		—		855		—
Total assets measured at fair value at March 31, 2017	$	3,280	$	—	$	3,280	$	—
December 31, 2016:
Interest rate cap derivative	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Interest rate swap derivatives		1,749		—		1,749		—
Life insurance policy (1)		861		—		861		—
Total assets measured at fair value at December 31, 2016	$	2,610	$	—	$	2,610	$	—

(1) Includes the split life insurance policy for a former Company associate. These amounts are included in other assets, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, and will be used to reimburse the Company for payments made to the former associate from the related retirement benefit agreement, which is included in accrued payroll and employee benefits on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Schedule of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis

The following table presents the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):

			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
March 31, 2017 (unaudited):
Retirement benefit agreement (1)	$	855	$	—	$	855	$	—
Total liabilities measured at fair value at March 31, 2017	$	855	$	—	$	855	$	—
December 31, 2016:
Retirement benefit agreement (1)	$	861	$	—	$	861	$	—
Total liabilities measured at fair value at December 31, 2016	$	861	$	—	$	861	$	—

(1) Includes the retirement benefit agreement for a former Company associate. The agreement calls for the balance of the retirement benefit to be paid out to the former associate in ten annual installments, beginning in 2011. As such, the Company has paid the former associate a total of $1.2 million through March 31, 2017, which was reimbursed to the Company using funds from the related split life insurance policy noted above. These amounts are included in accrued payroll and employee benefits on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Schedule of interest rate derivatives

The Company’s interest rate derivatives, which are not designated as effective cash flow hedges, consisted of the following at March 31, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):

									Estimated Fair Value Asset
		Strike / Capped			Effective	Maturity	Notional		March 31,		December 31,
Hedged Debt	Type	Rate		Index	Date	Date	Amount		2017		2016
Hilton San Diego Bayfront (1)	Cap	4.250	%	1-Month LIBOR	April 15, 2015	May 1, 2017	$	110,772	$	—	$	—
Hilton San Diego Bayfront (1)	Cap	4.250	%	1-Month LIBOR	May 1, 2017	May 1, 2019	$	N/A		4		—
$85.0 million term loan (2)	Swap	3.391	%	1-Month LIBOR	October 29, 2015	September 2, 2022	$	85,000		1,610		1,336
$100.0 million term loan (3)	Swap	3.653	%	1-Month LIBOR	January 29, 2016	January 31, 2023	$	100,000		811		413
									$	2,425	$	1,749

(1) In March 2017, the Company purchased a new interest rate cap agreement for $19,000 related to the loan secured by the Hilton San Diego Bayfront. The new agreement, whose terms are substantially the same as the terms under the old cap agreement, will effectively replace the old agreement on May 1, 2017. The fair values of both Hilton San Diego Bayfront cap agreements are included in other assets, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

(2) The fair value of the $85.0 million term loan swap agreement is included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The 1-month LIBOR rate was swapped to a fixed rate of 1.591%.

(3) The fair value of the $100.0 million term loan swap agreement is included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The 1-month LIBOR rate was swapped to a fixed rate of 1.853%.

Schedule of changes in fair value of interest rate derivatives

Noncash changes in the fair values of the Company’s interest rate derivatives resulted in (decreases) increases to interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net	$	(657)	$	6,402

XML

Other Assets (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Other Assets

Schedule of other assets

Other assets, net consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Property and equipment, net	$	699	$	779
Goodwill		990		990
Deferred expense on straight-lined third-party tenant leases		2,853		2,876
Interest rate derivatives		2,425		1,749
Other receivables		1,491		1,673
Other		1,487		1,322
Total other assets net	$	9,945	$	9,389

Schedule of property and equipment

The property and equipment, net noted above consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Cost basis	$	10,843	$	10,807
Accumulated depreciation		(10,144)		(10,028)
Property and equipment, net	$	699	$	779

XML

Notes Payable (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Notes Payable

Schedule of notes payable

Notes payable consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Notes payable requiring payments of interest and principal, with fixed rates ranging from 4.12% to 5.95%; maturing at dates ranging from November 2020 through January 2025. The notes are collateralized by first deeds of trust on four hotel properties at March 31, 2017, and five hotel properties at December 31, 2016.	$	350,802	$	528,604
Note payable requiring payments of interest and principal, bearing a blended rate of one-month LIBOR plus 225 basis points; maturing in August 2019. The note is collateralized by a first deed of trust on one hotel property.		221,544		222,340
Unsecured term loan requiring payments of interest only, with a blended interest rate based on a pricing grid with a range of 180 to 255 basis points over LIBOR, depending on the Company's leverage ratios. LIBOR has been swapped to a fixed rate of 1.591%, resulting in an effective interest rate of 3.391% based on the Company's current leverage. Matures in September 2022.		85,000		85,000
Unsecured term loan requiring payments of interest only, with a blended interest rate based on a pricing grid with a range of 180 to 255 basis points over LIBOR, depending on the Company's leverage ratios. LIBOR has been swapped to a fixed rate of 1.853%, resulting in an effective interest rate of 3.653% based on the Company's current leverage. Matures in January 2023.		100,000		100,000
Unsecured Series A Senior Notes requiring semi-annual payments of interest only, bearing interest at 4.69%; maturing in January 2026.		120,000		—
Unsecured Series B Senior Notes requiring semi-annual payments of interest only, bearing interest at 4.79%; maturing in January 2028.		120,000		—
Total notes payable	$	997,346	$	935,944
Current portion of notes payable	$	10,167	$	186,034
Less: current portion of deferred financing fees		(1,269)		(1,105)
Carrying value of current portion of notes payable	$	8,898	$	184,929
Notes payable, less current portion	$	987,179	$	749,910
Less: long-term portion of deferred financing fees		(4,719)		(3,536)
Carrying value of notes payable, less current portion	$	982,460	$	746,374

Schedule of interest incurred and expensed

Total interest incurred and expensed on the notes payable was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations	$	11,328	$	13,053
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net		(657)		6,402
Amortization of deferred financing fees		578		555
Total interest expense	$	11,249	$	20,010

XML

Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities

Schedule of other current liabilities

Other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Property, sales and use taxes payable	$	16,436	$	16,965
Income tax payable		382		211
Accrued interest		3,568		1,996
Advance deposits		17,820		14,505
Management fees payable		1,140		1,645
Other		4,440		4,547
Total other current liabilities	$	43,786	$	39,869

Schedule of other liabilities

Other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Deferred gain on sale of asset	$	7,000	$	7,000
Deferred revenue		6,149		6,045
Deferred rent		19,748		19,807
Deferred incentive management fees		201		—
Other		3,819		3,798
Total other liabilities	$	36,917	$	36,650

XML

Long-Term Incentive Plan (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Long-Term Incentive Plan

Schedule of amortization expense and forfeitures related to restricted shares and performance awards

In accordance with the Compensation Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur.  The Company’s amortization expense and forfeitures related to restricted shares for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Amortization expense, including forfeitures	$	1,749	$	1,614

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2017

Commitments and Contingencies

Schedule of basic and incentive management fees

Total basic management fees, net of key money incentives received from third-party hotel managers, along with incentive management fees incurred by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were included in other property-level expenses on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Basic management fees	$	7,895	$	7,667
Incentive management fees		2,553		1,704
Total basic and incentive management fees	$	10,448	$	9,371

Schedule of License and Franchise Costs

Total license and franchise fees incurred by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were included in franchise costs on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Franchise assessments (1)	$	5,927	$	5,813
Franchise royalties		2,128		2,283
Total franchise costs	$	8,055	$	8,096

(1) Includes advertising, reservation and frequent guest club assessments.

Schedule of assets under capital lease

The capital lease asset was included in investment in hotel properties, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as follows (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2017		2016
	(unaudited)
Gross capital lease asset - buildings and improvements	$	58,799	$	58,799
Accumulated depreciation		(7,105)		(6,738)
Net capital lease asset - buildings and improvements	$	51,694	$	52,061

Schedule of future minimum lease payments under capital lease

Future minimum lease payments under the Company’s capital lease together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of March 31, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):

2017	$	1,403
2018		1,403
2019		1,403
2020		1,403
2021		1,403
Thereafter		106,257
Total minimum lease payments (1)		113,272
Less: Amount representing interest (2)		(97,697)
Present value of net minimum lease payments (3)	$	15,575

(1) Minimum lease payments do not include percentage rent which may be paid under the Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile building lease on the basis of 4.0% of the hotel’s gross room revenues over a certain threshold. No percentage rent was due during either the three months ended March 31, 2017 or 2016.  

(2) Interest includes the amount necessary to reduce net minimum lease payments to present value calculated at the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at lease inception.

(3) The present value of net minimum lease payments are presented on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2017 as a current obligation of $1,000, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses, and as a long-term obligation of $15.6 million, which is included in capital lease obligations, less current portion.

Schedule of ground, building and air lease rent

Total rent expense incurred pursuant to ground, building and air lease agreements for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was included in property tax, ground lease and insurance on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Minimum rent, including straight-line adjustments	$	2,340	$	2,396
Percentage rent (1)		1,585		2,060
Total	$	3,925	$	4,456

(1) Several of the Company’s hotels pay percentage rent, which is calculated on operating revenues above certain thresholds.

Schedule of Hotel Geographic Concentration of Risk

As of March 31, 2017,  16 of the Company’s 27 hotels were concentrated in California, Illinois, Massachusetts and the greater Washington DC area as follows:

							Greater
							Washington DC
	California		Illinois		Massachusetts		Area
	(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Number of hotels	7		3		3		3
Percentage of total rooms	29	%	9	%	15	%	14	%
Percentage of total consolidated revenue during the past 12 months	34	%	7	%	15	%	14	%

XML

Organization and Description of Business (Details)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2017 property item
Organization and Description of Business
Number of hotels held for investment | property	27
Number of hotels managed by third parties	27
Marriott
Organization and Description of Business
Number of hotels managed by third parties	11
Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Inc
Organization and Description of Business
Number of hotels managed by third parties	5
Highgate Hotels L.P. and an affiliate
Organization and Description of Business
Number of hotels managed by third parties	3
Crestline Hotels & Resorts
Organization and Description of Business
Number of hotels managed by third parties	2
Hilton Worldwide
Organization and Description of Business
Number of hotels managed by third parties	2
Hyatt Corporation
Organization and Description of Business
Number of hotels managed by third parties	2
Davidson Hotels & Resorts
Organization and Description of Business
Number of hotels managed by third parties	1
HEI Hotels & Resorts
Organization and Description of Business
Number of hotels managed by third parties	1
Sunstone Hotel Partnership, LLC
Organization and Description of Business
Controlling interest owned (as a percent)	100.00%

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) $ / shares in Units, shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2017 USD ($) item $ / shares shares	Mar. 31, 2016 USD ($) $ / shares shares	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Numerator:
Net income	$ 63,827	$ 1,216
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest	(1,992)	(1,650)
Preferred stock dividends	(3,207)	(2,766)
Distributions paid on unvested restricted stock compensation	(60)	(60)
Undistributed income allocated to unvested restricted stock compensation	(248)
Numerator for basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$ 58,320	$ (3,260)
Denominator:
Weighted average basic and diluted common shares outstanding (in shares) | shares	219,093	212,887
Basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share (in dollars per share) | $ / shares	$ 0.27	$ (0.02)
ASU 2016-18 - New Accounting Pronouncement
Restricted cash to be included with cash upon adoption of ASU 2016-18	$ 64,414		$ 67,923
Segment Reporting
Number of operating segments | item	1
Hilton San Diego Bayfront
Basis of Presentation
Noncontrolling interest percentage in Hilton San Diego Bayfront	25.00%		25.00%
Stockholders' Equity Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest
Noncontrolling interest percentage in Hilton San Diego Bayfront	25.00%		25.00%

XML

Investment in Hotel Properties (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Investment in Hotel Properties
Land	$ 531,660	$ 531,660
Buildings and improvements	3,174,081	3,135,806
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	522,806	512,372
Intangible assets	48,759	49,015
Franchise fees	1,021	1,021
Construction in process	48,856	65,449
Investment in hotel properties, gross	4,327,183	4,295,323
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	(1,177,711)	(1,137,104)
Investment in hotel properties, net	$ 3,149,472	$ 3,158,219

XML

Disposals (Details) $ in Thousands	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	Feb. 28, 2017 USD ($) room	Mar. 31, 2017 USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2016 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Disposals
Gain on sale of assets		$ 44,285
Detail of Amounts Held for Sale
Assets held for sale, net				$ 79,113
Liabilities of assets held for sale				3,153
Sold, not considered a discontinued operation | Fairmont Newport Beach
Disposals
Number of rooms sold | room	444
Net proceeds received from sale	$ 122,800
Gain on sale of assets	$ 44,300	44,285
Detail of Amounts Held for Sale
Accounts receivable, net				452
Inventories				126
Prepaid expenses				386
Investment in hotel property, net				77,971
Other assets, net				178
Assets held for sale, net				79,113
Accounts payable and accrued expenses				781
Accrued payroll and employee benefits				751
Other current liabilities				1,473
Other liabilities				148
Liabilities of assets held for sale				$ 3,153
Total revenues		3,541
Income before income taxes		$ 1,019
Sold, not considered a discontinued operation | Fairmont Newport Beach and Sheraton Cerritos
Detail of Amounts Held for Sale
Total revenues			$ 11,248
Income before income taxes			$ 1,347

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives - Fair Value Measurements (Details) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2017 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2011 item
Assets:
Interest rate derivatives	$ 2,425	$ 1,749
Former Chairman
Liabilities:
Number of installments to be paid out under the Retirement Benefit Agreement | item			10
Total amount paid to date under the Retirement Benefit Agreement	1,200
Level 2
Assets:
Life insurance policy	855	861
Total assets	3,280	2,610
Liabilities:
Retirement benefit agreement	855	861
Total liabilities	855	861
Level 2 | Hilton San Diego Bayfront new interest rate cap
Assets:
Interest rate derivatives	4
Level 2 | Interest Rate Swap
Assets:
Interest rate derivatives	2,421	1,749
Total at the end of the period
Assets:
Life insurance policy	855	861
Total assets	3,280	2,610
Liabilities:
Retirement benefit agreement	855	861
Total liabilities	855	861
Total at the end of the period | Hilton San Diego Bayfront new interest rate cap
Assets:
Interest rate derivatives	4
Total at the end of the period | Interest Rate Swap
Assets:
Interest rate derivatives	$ 2,421	$ 1,749

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives - Interest Rate Derivatives (Details) - USD ($)	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017	Mar. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2016
Interest Rate Derivatives
Fair value of interest rate derivatives	$ 2,425,000	$ 2,425,000		$ 1,749,000
Fair values of derivative assets	$ 2,425,000	2,425,000		$ 1,749,000
Payment for interest rate derivative		19,000
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net		$ (657,000)	$ 6,402,000
Hilton San Diego Bayfront mortgage payable
Interest Rate Derivatives
Interest rate, description of reference rate		one-month LIBOR		one-month LIBOR
Interest rate added to base rate (as a percent)		2.25%		2.25%
$85.0 million term loan
Interest Rate Derivatives
Term loan total interest rate, including effect of swap agreement	3.391%	3.391%		3.391%
$100.0 million term loan
Interest Rate Derivatives
Term loan total interest rate, including effect of swap agreement	3.653%	3.653%		3.653%
Interest Rate Cap | Not designated as hedging instrument | Hilton San Diego Bayfront mortgage payable
Interest Rate Derivatives
Strike rate under interest rate cap agreement	4.25%	4.25%		4.25%
Interest rate, description of reference rate		1-Month LIBOR		1-Month LIBOR
Effective date		Apr. 15, 2015		Apr. 15, 2015
Maturity Date		May 01, 2017		May 01, 2017
Notional amount	$ 110,772,000	$ 110,772,000
Hilton San Diego Bayfront new interest rate cap | Not designated as hedging instrument | Hilton San Diego Bayfront mortgage payable
Interest Rate Derivatives
Strike rate under interest rate cap agreement	4.25%	4.25%
Interest rate, description of reference rate		1-Month LIBOR
Effective date		May 01, 2017
Maturity Date		May 01, 2019
Fair value of interest rate derivatives	$ 4,000	$ 4,000
Payment for interest rate derivative	$ 19,000
Interest Rate Swap | $85.0 million term loan
Interest Rate Derivatives
Fixed rate under interest rate swap agreement	1.591%	1.591%		1.591%
Interest Rate Swap | $100.0 million term loan
Interest Rate Derivatives
Fixed rate under interest rate swap agreement	1.853%	1.853%		1.853%
Interest Rate Swap | Not designated as hedging instrument | $85.0 million term loan
Interest Rate Derivatives
Term loan total interest rate, including effect of swap agreement	3.391%	3.391%		3.391%
Interest rate, description of reference rate		1-Month LIBOR		1-Month LIBOR
Effective date		Oct. 29, 2015		Oct. 29, 2015
Maturity Date		Sep. 02, 2022		Sep. 02, 2022
Notional amount	$ 85,000,000	$ 85,000,000
Fair value of interest rate derivatives	$ 1,610,000	$ 1,610,000		$ 1,336,000
Fixed rate under interest rate swap agreement	1.591%	1.591%		1.591%
Interest Rate Swap | Not designated as hedging instrument | $100.0 million term loan
Interest Rate Derivatives
Term loan total interest rate, including effect of swap agreement	3.653%	3.653%		3.653%
Interest rate, description of reference rate		1-Month LIBOR		1-Month LIBOR
Effective date		Jan. 29, 2016		Jan. 29, 2016
Maturity Date		Jan. 31, 2023		Jan. 31, 2023
Notional amount	$ 100,000,000	$ 100,000,000
Fair value of interest rate derivatives	$ 811,000	$ 811,000		$ 413,000
Fixed rate under interest rate swap agreement	1.853%	1.853%		1.853%

XML

Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives - Fair Value of Debt (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Percentage of Debt Bearing Fixed Interest Rates	77.80%	76.20%
Notes payable	$ 997,346	$ 935,944
Level 3
Fair value of debt	$ 1,000,000	$ 900,000

XML

Other Assets (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Other assets, net
Property and equipment, net	$ 699	$ 779
Goodwill	990	990
Deferred expense on straight-lined third-party tenant leases	2,853	2,876
Interest rate derivatives	2,425	1,749
Other receivables	1,491	1,673
Other	1,487	1,322
Total other assets, net	$ 9,945	$ 9,389

XML

Other Assets - Property and Equipment (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Other Assets
Property and equipment, gross	$ 10,843	$ 10,807
Accumulated depreciation	(10,144)	(10,028)
Property and equipment, net	$ 699	$ 779

XML

Notes Payable (Details) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2017 USD ($) property	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($) property	Jan. 31, 2017
Notes payable
Total notes payable	$ 997,346	$ 935,944
Current portion of notes payable	10,167	186,034
Less: current portion of deferred financing fees	(1,269)	(1,105)
Current portion of notes payable, net	8,898	184,929
Notes payable, less current portion	987,179	749,910
Less: long-term portion of deferred financing fees	(4,719)	(3,536)
Carrying value of notes payable, less current portion	$ 982,460	$ 746,374
Notes payable maturing in various years
Notes payable
Number of hotels provided as collateral | property	4	5
Total notes payable	$ 350,802	$ 528,604
Notes payable maturing in various years | Minimum
Notes payable
Fixed interest rate (as a percent)	4.12%	4.12%
Notes payable maturing in various years | Maximum
Notes payable
Fixed interest rate (as a percent)	5.95%	5.95%
Hilton San Diego Bayfront mortgage payable
Notes payable
Number of hotels provided as collateral | property	1	1
Interest rate, description of reference rate	one-month LIBOR	one-month LIBOR
Interest rate added to base rate (as a percent)	2.25%	2.25%
Total notes payable	$ 221,544	$ 222,340
$85.0 million term loan
Notes payable
Term loan total interest rate, including effect of swap agreement	3.391%	3.391%
Total notes payable	$ 85,000	$ 85,000
$85.0 million term loan | Minimum
Notes payable
Interest rate added to base rate (as a percent)	1.80%	1.80%
$85.0 million term loan | Maximum
Notes payable
Interest rate added to base rate (as a percent)	2.55%	2.55%
$100.0 million term loan
Notes payable
Term loan total interest rate, including effect of swap agreement	3.653%	3.653%
Total notes payable	$ 100,000	$ 100,000
$100.0 million term loan | Minimum
Notes payable
Interest rate added to base rate (as a percent)	1.80%	1.80%
$100.0 million term loan | Maximum
Notes payable
Interest rate added to base rate (as a percent)	2.55%	2.55%
Series A Senior Notes
Notes payable
Fixed interest rate (as a percent)	4.69%		4.69%
Total notes payable	$ 120,000
Series B Senior Notes
Notes payable
Fixed interest rate (as a percent)	4.79%		4.79%
Total notes payable	$ 120,000
Interest Rate Swap | $85.0 million term loan
Notes payable
Fixed rate under interest rate swap agreement	1.591%	1.591%
Interest Rate Swap | $100.0 million term loan
Notes payable
Fixed rate under interest rate swap agreement	1.853%	1.853%
Not designated as hedging instrument | Interest Rate Cap | Hilton San Diego Bayfront mortgage payable
Notes payable
Interest rate, description of reference rate	1-Month LIBOR	1-Month LIBOR
Not designated as hedging instrument | Interest Rate Swap | $85.0 million term loan
Notes payable
Interest rate, description of reference rate	1-Month LIBOR	1-Month LIBOR
Fixed rate under interest rate swap agreement	1.591%	1.591%
Term loan total interest rate, including effect of swap agreement	3.391%	3.391%
Not designated as hedging instrument | Interest Rate Swap | $100.0 million term loan
Notes payable
Interest rate, description of reference rate	1-Month LIBOR	1-Month LIBOR
Fixed rate under interest rate swap agreement	1.853%	1.853%
Term loan total interest rate, including effect of swap agreement	3.653%	3.653%

XML

Notes Payable - Transactions (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017	Mar. 31, 2016
Notes Payable Transactions
Proceeds from notes payable		$ 240,000	$ 100,000
Senior Notes
Notes Payable Transactions
Proceeds from notes payable	$ 240,000
Series A Senior Notes
Notes Payable Transactions
Proceeds from notes payable	$ 120,000
Fixed interest rate (as a percent)	4.69%	4.69%
Series B Senior Notes
Notes Payable Transactions
Proceeds from notes payable	$ 120,000
Fixed interest rate (as a percent)	4.79%	4.79%
Marriott Boston Long Wharf mortgage payable
Notes Payable Transactions
Fixed interest rate (as a percent)	5.58%
Repayment of mortgage debt	$ 176,000

XML

Notes Payable - Interest Expense (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2017	Mar. 31, 2016
Interest incurred and expensed
Interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations	$ 11,328	$ 13,053
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net	(657)	6,402
Amortization of deferred financing fees	578	555
Total interest incurred and expensed on debt and capital lease obligations	$ 11,249	$ 20,010

XML

Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016
Other Current Liabilities
Property, sales and use taxes payable	$ 16,436	$ 16,965
Income tax payable	382	211
Accrued interest	3,568	1,996
Advance deposits	17,820	14,505
Management fees payable	1,140	1,645
Other	4,440	4,547
Total other current liabilities	43,786	39,869
Other Liabilities
Deferred gain on sale of asset	7,000	7,000
Deferred revenue	6,149	6,045
Deferred rent	19,748	19,807
Deferred incentive management fees	201
Other	3,819	3,798
Total other liabilities	$ 36,917	$ 36,650

XML

Stockholders' Equity (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	1 Months Ended		3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	May 31, 2016	Mar. 31, 2016	Mar. 31, 2017	Mar. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2016	Feb. 28, 2017
Stockholders' equity
Proceeds from preferred stock offerings				$ 115,000
Payment of preferred stock offering costs				$ 4,016
Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
Stockholders' equity
Number of shares of preferred stock sold (in shares)		4,600,000
Preferred stock, Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, dividend rate (as a percent)		6.95%	6.95%		6.95%
Liquidation preference (in dollars per share)		$ 25.00	$ 25.00	$ 25.00	$ 25.00
Proceeds from preferred stock offerings		$ 115,000
Payment of preferred stock offering costs		$ 4,000
Redemption price (in dollars per share)			$ 25.00
Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
Stockholders' equity
Number of shares of preferred stock sold (in shares)	3,000,000
Preferred stock, Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, dividend rate (as a percent)	6.45%		6.45%		6.45%
Liquidation preference (in dollars per share)	$ 25.00		$ 25.00		$ 25.00
Proceeds from preferred stock offerings	$ 75,000
Payment of preferred stock offering costs	$ 2,600
Redemption price (in dollars per share)			$ 25.00
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
Stockholders' equity
Repurchase Program, number of shares repurchased (in shares)			0
Common Stock
Stockholders' equity
Repurchase Program, number of shares repurchased (in shares)			0
Common Stock | At The Market
Stockholders' equity
ATM Program, number of shares sold or issued (in shares)			0
ATM Program, remaining amount authorized for issuance			$ 300,000
Common Stock | Maximum
Stockholders' equity
Repurchase Program, maximum amount authorized for repurchase						$ 300,000
Common Stock | Maximum | At The Market
Stockholders' equity
ATM Program, maximum amount authorized for issuance						$ 300,000

XML

Long-Term Incentive Plan (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2008	Mar. 31, 2017	Mar. 31, 2016
Long-Term Incentive Plan
Amortization related to shares issued to design and construction employees		$ 151	$ 239
Restricted Shares
Long-Term Incentive Plan
Amortization Expense, including forfeitures		1,749	1,614
Amortization related to shares issued to design and construction employees		$ 200	$ 200
Restricted Shares | Minimum
Long-Term Incentive Plan
Vesting period		3 years
Restricted Shares | Maximum
Long-Term Incentive Plan
Vesting period		5 years
Stock Options | Former Chairman
Stock options
Number of nonqualified stock options approved by the compensation committee of the Company's board of directors (in shares)	200,000
Exercise price of outstanding options (in dollars per share)		$ 17.71

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2017	Mar. 31, 2016
Basic and incentive management fees incurred
Basic management fees	$ 7,895	$ 7,667
Incentive management fees	2,553	1,704
Total basic and incentive management fees	10,448	9,371
License and Franchise Agreements
Franchise assessments	5,927	5,813
Franchise royalties	2,128	2,283
Total franchise costs	$ 8,055	$ 8,096
Minimum
Management Agreements
Basic management fees (as a percent)	1.75%
Maximum
Management Agreements
Basic management fees (as a percent)	3.50%
Renovation and Construction Commitments
Renovation and Construction Commitments
Remaining construction commitments	$ 46,100

XML

Commitments and Contingencies - Capital and Operating Leases (Details) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2017	Mar. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2016
Future minimum lease payments under capital leases
2017	$ 1,403,000
2018	1,403,000
2019	1,403,000
2020	1,403,000
2021	1,403,000
Thereafter	106,257,000
Total minimum lease payments	113,272,000
Less: Amount representing interest	(97,697,000)
Present value of net minimum lease payments	15,575,000
Capital lease obligation, current	1,000
Capital lease obligation, noncurrent	15,574,000		$ 15,574,000
Ground and Operating Leases
Minimum rent, including straight-line adjustments	2,340,000	$ 2,396,000
Percentage rent	1,585,000	2,060,000
Total rent expense included in property tax, ground lease and insurance	3,925,000	4,456,000
Lease expense on corporate facility	$ 100,000	$ 100,000
Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile
Future minimum lease payments under capital leases
Capital lease contingent rent criteria (as a percent)	4.00%	4.00%
Percentage rent due	$ 0	$ 0
Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile | Buildings and improvements
Assets under capital lease
Capital Leased Assets, Gross	58,799,000		58,799,000
Accumulated depreciation	(7,105,000)		(6,738,000)
Capital lease assets, net	$ 51,694,000		$ 52,061,000

XML

Commitments and Contingencies - Concentration of Risk and Other (Details) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2017 USD ($) property	Mar. 31, 2017 USD ($) property
Concentration of Risk
Number of hotels which are held for investment	27	27
Other
Term of unsecured environmental indemnities	0 years
Damage limitation of unsecured environmental indemnities | $	$ 0
California
Concentration of Risk
Number of hotels which are held for investment	7	7
Illinois
Concentration of Risk
Number of hotels which are held for investment	3	3
Massachusetts
Concentration of Risk
Number of hotels which are held for investment	3	3
Greater Washington DC Area
Concentration of Risk
Number of hotels which are held for investment	3	3
Percentage of total rooms | California
Concentration of Risk
Concentration risk (as a percent)	29.00%
Percentage of total rooms | Illinois
Concentration of Risk
Concentration risk (as a percent)	9.00%
Percentage of total rooms | Massachusetts
Concentration of Risk
Concentration risk (as a percent)	15.00%
Percentage of total rooms | Greater Washington DC Area
Concentration of Risk
Concentration risk (as a percent)	14.00%
Percentage of total revenue generated by hotels | California
Concentration of Risk
Concentration risk (as a percent)		34.00%
Percentage of total revenue generated by hotels | Illinois
Concentration of Risk
Concentration risk (as a percent)		7.00%
Percentage of total revenue generated by hotels | Massachusetts
Concentration of Risk
Concentration risk (as a percent)		15.00%
Percentage of total revenue generated by hotels | Greater Washington DC Area
Concentration of Risk
Concentration risk (as a percent)		14.00%
Workers' compensation insurance programs
Other
Outstanding irrevocable letters of credit | $	$ 500	$ 500
Draws on letters of credit | $	$ 0