UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017
OR
☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-32319
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland |
|
20-1296886 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
|
|
|
120 Vantis, Suite 350 |
|
92656 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (949) 330-4000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☒ |
|
Accelerated filer ☐ |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer ☐ |
|
Smaller reporting company ☐ |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
|
|
|
Emerging growth company ◻ |
|
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ◻
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
220,463,909 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, as of May 1, 2017
SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2017
i
SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
441,830 |
|
$ |
369,537 |
Restricted cash |
|
|
64,414 |
|
|
67,923 |
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
50,229 |
|
|
39,337 |
Inventories |
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
1,225 |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
13,252 |
|
|
10,489 |
Assets held for sale, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
79,113 |
Total current assets |
|
|
570,977 |
|
|
567,624 |
Investment in hotel properties, net |
|
|
3,149,472 |
|
|
3,158,219 |
Deferred financing fees, net |
|
|
2,087 |
|
|
4,002 |
Other assets, net |
|
|
9,945 |
|
|
9,389 |
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,732,481 |
|
$ |
3,739,234 |
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
36,327 |
|
$ |
36,110 |
Accrued payroll and employee benefits |
|
|
17,078 |
|
|
24,896 |
Dividends and distributions payable |
|
|
14,228 |
|
|
119,847 |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
43,786 |
|
|
39,869 |
Current portion of notes payable, net |
|
|
8,898 |
|
|
184,929 |
Liabilities of assets held for sale |
|
|
— |
|
|
3,153 |
Total current liabilities |
|
|
120,317 |
|
|
408,804 |
Notes payable, less current portion, net |
|
|
982,460 |
|
|
746,374 |
Capital lease obligations, less current portion |
|
|
15,574 |
|
|
15,574 |
Other liabilities |
|
|
36,917 |
|
|
36,650 |
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,155,268 |
|
|
1,207,402 |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.95% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 4,600,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, stated at liquidation preference of $25.00 per share |
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
115,000 |
6.45% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 3,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, stated at liquidation preference of $25.00 per share |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
75,000 |
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 220,417,417 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and 220,073,140 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 |
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
2,201 |
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
2,594,724 |
|
|
2,596,620 |
Retained earnings |
|
|
848,736 |
|
|
786,901 |
Cumulative dividends and distributions |
|
|
(1,107,180) |
|
|
(1,092,952) |
Total stockholders’ equity |
|
|
2,528,484 |
|
|
2,482,770 |
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint venture |
|
|
48,729 |
|
|
49,062 |
Total equity |
|
|
2,577,213 |
|
|
2,531,832 |
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
3,732,481 |
|
$ |
3,739,234 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||
|
|
March 31, 2017 |
|
March 31, 2016 |
|
||
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Room |
|
$ |
190,367 |
|
$ |
187,297 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
75,501 |
|
|
71,234 |
|
Other operating |
|
|
14,875 |
|
|
15,761 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
280,743 |
|
|
274,292 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Room |
|
|
51,292 |
|
|
51,044 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
50,537 |
|
|
51,929 |
|
Other operating |
|
|
3,831 |
|
|
4,056 |
|
Advertising and promotion |
|
|
14,946 |
|
|
14,993 |
|
Repairs and maintenance |
|
|
10,967 |
|
|
11,264 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
7,222 |
|
|
7,514 |
|
Franchise costs |
|
|
8,055 |
|
|
8,096 |
|
Property tax, ground lease and insurance |
|
|
21,287 |
|
|
22,840 |
|
Other property-level expenses |
|
|
34,738 |
|
|
34,713 |
|
Corporate overhead |
|
|
6,779 |
|
|
6,717 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
40,807 |
|
|
40,047 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
250,461 |
|
|
253,213 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
30,282 |
|
|
21,079 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
721 |
|
|
489 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(11,249) |
|
|
(20,010) |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(4) |
|
|
(105) |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
44,285 |
|
|
— |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
64,035 |
|
|
1,453 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
(208) |
|
|
(237) |
|
NET INCOME |
|
|
63,827 |
|
|
1,216 |
|
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(1,992) |
|
|
(1,650) |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(3,207) |
|
|
(2,766) |
|
INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
58,628 |
|
$ |
(3,200) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
63,827 |
|
$ |
1,216 |
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
58,628 |
|
$ |
(3,200) |
|
Basic and diluted per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
$ |
(0.02) |
|
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
219,093 |
|
|
212,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Series E |
|
Series F |
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
Interest in |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Additional |
|
Retained |
|
Dividends and |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Paid in Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Distributions |
|
Joint Venture |
|
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 (audited) |
|
4,600,000 |
|
$ |
115,000 |
|
3,000,000 |
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
220,073,140 |
|
$ |
2,201 |
|
$ |
2,596,620 |
|
$ |
786,901 |
|
$ |
(1,092,952) |
|
$ |
49,062 |
|
$ |
2,531,832 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred stock compensation, net |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
344,277 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
(1,896) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1,893) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock distributions and distributions payable at $0.05 per share year to date |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(11,021) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(11,021) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Series E preferred stock dividends and dividends payable at $0.434375 per share year to date |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1,998) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1,998) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Series F preferred stock dividends and dividends payable at $0.403125 per share year to date |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1,209) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1,209) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(2,325) |
|
|
(2,325) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
61,835 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
63,827 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2017 |
|
4,600,000 |
|
$ |
115,000 |
|
3,000,000 |
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
220,417,417 |
|
$ |
2,204 |
|
$ |
2,594,724 |
|
$ |
848,736 |
|
$ |
(1,107,180) |
|
$ |
48,729 |
|
$ |
2,577,213 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
||
|
|
March 31, 2017 |
|
March 31, 2016 |
||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
63,827 |
|
$ |
1,216 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
131 |
|
|
109 |
Gain on sale of assets, net |
|
|
(44,570) |
|
|
(7) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
4 |
|
|
105 |
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net |
|
|
(657) |
|
|
6,402 |
Depreciation |
|
|
40,150 |
|
|
39,333 |
Amortization of franchise fees and other intangibles |
|
|
819 |
|
|
773 |
Amortization of deferred financing fees |
|
|
578 |
|
|
555 |
Amortization of deferred stock compensation |
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
1,614 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
4,013 |
|
|
8,176 |
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(10,575) |
|
|
(14,396) |
Inventories |
|
|
5 |
|
|
39 |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(2,387) |
|
|
(1,729) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
(370) |
|
|
7,691 |
Accrued payroll and employee benefits |
|
|
(8,569) |
|
|
(6,790) |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
44,148 |
|
|
43,091 |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets |
|
|
123,117 |
|
|
7 |
Restricted cash — replacement reserve |
|
|
(504) |
|
|
(309) |
Renovations and additions to hotel properties |
|
|
(29,872) |
|
|
(48,818) |
Payment for interest rate derivative |
|
|
(19) |
|
|
— |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
92,722 |
|
|
(49,120) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from preferred stock offerings |
|
|
— |
|
|
115,000 |
Payment of preferred stock offering costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
(4,016) |
Repurchase of common stock for employee withholding obligations |
|
|
(3,793) |
|
|
(2,641) |
Proceeds from notes payable |
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
100,000 |
Payments on notes payable |
|
|
(178,599) |
|
|
(117,558) |
Payments of deferred financing costs |
|
|
(13) |
|
|
(78) |
Dividends and distributions paid |
|
|
(119,847) |
|
|
(186,301) |
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(2,325) |
|
|
(775) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(64,577) |
|
|
(96,369) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
72,293 |
|
|
(102,398) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
369,537 |
|
|
499,067 |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
441,830 |
|
$ |
396,669 |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
9,632 |
|
$ |
12,455 |
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
38 |
|
$ |
204 |
NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts payable related to renovations and additions to hotel properties and other assets |
|
$ |
2,119 |
|
$ |
5,844 |
Amortization of deferred stock compensation — construction activities |
|
$ |
151 |
|
$ |
239 |
NONCASH FINANCING ACTIVITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock distributions |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
78,823 |
Dividends and distributions payable |
|
$ |
14,228 |
|
$ |
13,592 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization and Description of Business
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Maryland on June 28, 2004 in anticipation of an initial public offering of common stock, which was consummated on October 26, 2004. The Company, through its 100% controlling interest in Sunstone Hotel Partnership, LLC (the “Operating Partnership”), of which the Company is the sole managing member, and the subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, including Sunstone Hotel TRS Lessee, Inc. (the “TRS Lessee”) and its subsidiaries, is currently engaged in acquiring, owning, asset managing and renovating hotel properties. The Company may also sell certain hotel properties from time to time. The Company operates as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes.
As a REIT, certain tax laws limit the amount of “non-qualifying” income the Company can earn, including income derived directly from the operation of hotels. The Company leases all of its hotels to its TRS Lessee, which in turn enters into long-term management agreements with third parties to manage the operations of the Company’s hotels, in transactions that are intended to generate qualifying income. As of March 31, 2017, the Company had interests in 27 hotels (the “27 hotels”), and the Company’s third-party managers included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Hotels |
Subsidiaries of Marriott International, Inc. or Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. (collectively, “Marriott”) |
|
11 |
Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Inc. |
|
5 |
Highgate Hotels L.P. and an affiliate |
|
3 |
Crestline Hotels & Resorts |
|
2 |
Hilton Worldwide |
|
2 |
Hyatt Corporation |
|
2 |
Davidson Hotels & Resorts |
|
1 |
HEI Hotels & Resorts |
|
1 |
|
|
|
Total hotels held for investment |
|
27 |
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, the TRS Lessee and their subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. If the Company determines that it has an interest in a variable interest entity within the meaning of the Consolidation Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), the Company will consolidate the entity when it is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the entity. Based on its review, the Company determined that all of its subsidiaries were properly consolidated as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
Noncontrolling interest at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 represents the outside 25.0% equity interest in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront, which the Company includes in its financial statements on a consolidated basis.
The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the Company’s opinion, the interim financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments, consisting solely of normal and recurring adjustments, which are necessary to fairly present the interim financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23, 2017.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of these financial statements.
6
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Earnings Per Share
The Company applies the two-class method when computing its earnings per share. As required by the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC, the net income per share for each class of stock (common stock and convertible preferred stock) is calculated assuming all of the Company’s net income is distributed as dividends to each class of stock based on their contractual rights. To the extent the Company has undistributed earnings in any calendar quarter, the Company will follow the two-class method of computing earnings per share.
The Company follows the requirements of the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are considered participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.
In accordance with the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC, basic earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period, plus potential common shares considered outstanding during the period, as long as the inclusion of such awards is not anti-dilutive. Potential common shares consist of unvested restricted stock awards and the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, using the more dilutive of either the two-class method or the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||
|
|
March 31, 2017 |
|
March 31, 2016 |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
||
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
63,827 |
|
$ |
1,216 |
|
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(1,992) |
|
|
(1,650) |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(3,207) |
|
|
(2,766) |
|
Distributions paid on unvested restricted stock compensation |
|
|
(60) |
|
|
(60) |
|
Undistributed income allocated to unvested restricted stock compensation |
|
|
(248) |
|
|
— |
|
Numerator for basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
58,320 |
|
$ |
(3,260) |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic and diluted common shares outstanding |
|
|
219,093 |
|
|
212,887 |
|
Basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
$ |
(0.02) |
|
The Company’s unvested restricted shares associated with its long-term incentive plan and shares associated with common stock options have been excluded from the above calculation of earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
New Accounting Standards and Accounting Changes
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU No. 2014-09”). The core principle of ASU No. 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity will need to apply a five-step model: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU No. 2014-09 was originally to be effective during the first quarter of 2017; however, the FASB issued a one-year deferral so that it now becomes effective during the first quarter of 2018. ASU No. 2014-09 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.
7
In March 2016, the FASB clarified the principal versus agent guidance in ASU No. 2014-09 with its issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)” (“ASU No. 2016-08”). In particular, ASU No. 2016-08 clarifies how an entity should identify the unit of accounting for the principal versus agent evaluation and how it should apply the control principle to certain types of arrangements, such as service transactions by explaining what a principal controls before the specified good or service is transferred to the customer. In addition, ASU No. 2016-08 reframes the indicators to focus on evidence that an entity is acting as a principal rather than as an agent. ASU No. 2016-08 will become effective, along with ASU No. 2014-09, during the first quarter of 2018. Similar to ASU No. 2014-09, ASU No. 2016-08 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.
In May 2016, the FASB amended ASU No. 2014-09’s guidance on transition, collectability, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes with its issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients” (“ASU No. 2016-12”). The amendments clarify that, for a contract to be considered completed at transition, all (or substantially all) of the revenue must have been recognized under legacy GAAP. This clarification is important because entities that use the modified retrospective transition approach need to apply the standard only to contracts that are not complete as of the date of initial application, and entities that use the full retrospective approach may apply certain practical expedients to completed contracts. In addition, ASU No. 2016-12 clarifies that an entity should consider the probability of collecting substantially all of the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for goods and services expected to be transferred to the customer rather than the total amount promised for all the goods or services in the contract. ASU No. 2016-12 also clarifies that an entity may consider its ability to manage its exposure to credit risk as part of the collectability assessment, as well as that the fair value of noncash consideration should be measured at contract inception when determining the transaction price. Finally, ASU No. 2016-12 allows an entity to make an accounting policy election to exclude from the transaction price certain types of taxes collected from a customer if it discloses that policy. ASU No. 2016-12 will become effective, along with ASU No. 2014-09, during the first quarter of 2018. Similar to ASU No. 2014-09, ASU No. 2016-12 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.
The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2014-09, along with the related clarifications and amendments in ASU No. 2016-08 and ASU No. 2016-12, will have on its recognition of revenue included in its consolidated financial statements. While the Company is still evaluating the impact that the ASUs will have on accounting for the gain recognized upon the sale of a hotel, there is a possibility that the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 will affect the timing of any gain recognition in the consolidated financial statements. For example, under current guidance, a gain on the sale of hotel properties with contingencies and some future involvement is deferred until all contingencies have been removed. Under the new guidance, however, the entire gain on sale may be recognized upon the close of escrow. The Company expects to adopt the new ASUs under the modified retrospective approach.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU No. 2016-02”), which will require lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses in the income statement in a manner similar to today’s accounting. The guidance also eliminates today’s real estate-specific provisions and changes the guidance on sale-leaseback transactions, initial direct costs and lease executory costs for all entities. For lessors, the standard modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. All entities will classify leases to determine how to recognize lease-related revenue and expense. Classification will continue to affect amounts that lessors record on the balance sheet. ASU No. 2016-02 will become effective during the first quarter of 2019, and will require a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements, and, other than the inclusion of operating leases on the Company’s balance sheet, such effects have not yet been determined.
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU No. 2016-13”), which will replace today’s “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized cost. For trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and other instruments, entities will be required to use a new forward looking “expected loss” model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for losses. In addition, entities will have to disclose significantly more information, including information they use to track credit quality by year of origination for most financing receivables. ASU No. 2016-13 will become effective during the first quarter of 2020. ASU No. 2016-13 will require a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted during the first quarter of 2019. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2016-13 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU No. 2016-15”), which clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-15 addresses certain issues where diversity in practice was identified. It amends existing guidance, which is principles based and often requires judgment to determine the appropriate classification of cash flows as operating, investing or financing activities. In addition, ASU No. 2016-15 clarifies how the predominance principle should be applied when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of
8
more than one class of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-15 will become effective during the first quarter of 2018, and will generally require a retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2016-15 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU No. 2016-18”), which will require entities to show the changes in total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. When cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are presented in more than one line item on the balance sheet, the new guidance requires a reconciliation of the totals in the statement of cash flows to the related caption in the balance sheet. This reconciliation can be presented either on the face of the statement of cash flows or in the notes to the financial statements. ASU No. 2016-18 will become effective in the first quarter of 2018, and will require a retrospective approach. Early adoption in an interim period is permitted, but any adjustments must be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes the interim period. Upon adoption of this standard, amounts included in restricted cash on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets will be included with cash and cash equivalents on its consolidated statements of cash flows. These amounts totaled $64.4 million and $67.9 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The adoption of this standard will not change the Company’s balance sheet presentation.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU No. 2017-01”), which changes the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. Under the new guidance, an entity first determines whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. If this threshold is met, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. If it is not met, the entity then evaluates whether the set meets the requirement that a business include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. ASU No. 2017-01 will become effective in the first quarter of 2018, and the guidance is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. Once adopted, the Company will be required to analyze future hotel acquisitions to determine if the transaction qualifies as the purchase of a business or an asset. Transaction costs associated with asset acquisitions will be capitalized, while the same costs associated with a business combination will continue to be expensed as incurred. In addition, asset acquisitions will not be subject to a measurement period, as are business combinations. Depending on the Company’s conclusion, ASU No. 2017-01 may have an effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU No. 2017-04”), which eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill (i.e., Step 2 of today’s goodwill impairment test) to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Under the new guidance, if a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard does not change the guidance on completing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. An entity will still be able to perform today’s optional qualitative goodwill impairment assessment before determining whether to proceed to Step 1. ASU No. 2017-04 will become effective in the first quarter of 2019, and the guidance is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2017-04 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Noncontrolling Interest
The Company’s consolidated financial statements include an entity in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Noncontrolling interest is the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. Such noncontrolling interest is reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity. On the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from the less-than-wholly-owned subsidiary is reported at the consolidated amount, including both the amounts attributable to the Company and the noncontrolling interest. Income or loss is allocated to the noncontrolling interest based on its weighted average ownership percentage for the applicable period. The consolidated statement of equity includes beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for each component of stockholders’ equity, noncontrolling interest and total equity.
At both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the noncontrolling interest reported in the Company’s financial statements included the 25.0% outside ownership in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront.
Segment Reporting
The Company considers each of its hotels to be an operating segment, none of which meets the threshold for a separate reportable segment in accordance with the Segment Reporting Topic of the FASB ASC. Currently, the Company operates in one segment, hotel ownership.
9
3. Investment in Hotel Properties
Investment in hotel properties, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
531,660 |
|
$ |
531,660 |
Buildings and improvements |
3,174,081 |
3,135,806 |
||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
522,806 |
|
|
512,372 |
Intangible assets |
|
|
48,759 |
|
|
49,015 |
Franchise fees |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
1,021 |
Construction in process |
|
|
48,856 |
|
|
65,449 |
Investment in hotel properties, gross |
|
|
4,327,183 |
|
|
4,295,323 |
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(1,177,711) |
|
|
(1,137,104) |
Investment in hotel properties, net |
|
$ |
3,149,472 |
|
$ |
3,158,219 |
4. Disposals
In February 2017, the Company sold the 444-room Fairmont Newport Beach located in Newport Beach, California for net proceeds of $122.8 million. The Company recognized a net gain on the sale of $44.3 million. The sale did not represent a strategic shift that had a major impact on the Company’s business plan or its primary markets, and therefore, the sale of the hotel did not qualify as a discontinued operation. The Company classified the assets and liabilities of the Fairmont Newport Beach as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 as follows (in thousands):
|
|
December 31, |
|||
|
|
2016 |
|||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
452 |
||
Inventories |
|
|
126 |
||
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
386 |
||
Investment in hotel property, net |
|
|
77,971 |
||
Other assets, net |
|
|
178 |
||
Assets held for sale, net |
|
$ |
79,113 |
||
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
781 |
||
Accrued payroll and employee benefits |
|
|
751 |
||
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,473 |
||
Other liabilities |
|
|
148 |
||
Liabilities of assets held for sale |
|
$ |
3,153 |
The following table provides summary results of operations for the Fairmont Newport Beach, as well as the Sheraton Cerritos that was sold during 2016, both of which are included in continuing operations (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||
|
|
March 31, 2017 |
|
March 31, 2016 |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
||
Revenues |
|
$ |
3,541 |
|
$ |
11,248 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
1,019 |
|
$ |
1,347 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
$ |
44,285 |
|
$ |
— |
|
5. Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the carrying amount of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses were representative of their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.
The Company follows the requirements of the Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Topic of the FASB ASC, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value and disclosing fair value measurements by establishing a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted
10
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 |
Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
|
|
Level 2 |
Inputs reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or the liability; or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. |
|
|
Level 3 |
Unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions incorporated in valuation techniques used to determine fair value. These assumptions are required to be consistent with market participant assumptions that are reasonably available. |
As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the only financial instruments that the Company measures at fair value are its interest rate derivatives, along with a life insurance policy and a related retirement benefit agreement. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company estimates the fair value of its interest rate derivatives using Level 2 measurements based on quotes obtained from the counterparties, which are based upon the consideration that would be required to terminate the agreements. Both the life insurance policy and the related retirement benefit agreement, which are for a former Company associate, are valued using Level 2 measurements.
The following table presents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date |
|||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017 (unaudited): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate cap derivatives |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
— |
Interest rate swap derivatives |
|
|
2,421 |
|
|
— |
|
|
2,421 |
|
|
— |
Life insurance policy (1) |
|
|
855 |
|
|
— |
|
|
855 |
|
|
— |
Total assets measured at fair value at March 31, 2017 |
|
$ |
3,280 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
3,280 |
|
$ |
— |
December 31, 2016: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate cap derivative |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
Interest rate swap derivatives |
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
— |
Life insurance policy (1) |
|
|
861 |
|
|
— |
|
|
861 |
|
|
— |
Total assets measured at fair value at December 31, 2016 |
|
$ |
2,610 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
2,610 |
|
$ |
— |
(1) |
Includes the split life insurance policy for a former Company associate. These amounts are included in other assets, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, and will be used to reimburse the Company for payments made to the former associate from the related retirement benefit agreement, which is included in accrued payroll and employee benefits on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. |
The following table presents the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date |
|||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017 (unaudited): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement benefit agreement (1) |
|
$ |
855 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
855 |
|
$ |
— |
Total liabilities measured at fair value at March 31, 2017 |
|
$ |
855 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
855 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement benefit agreement (1) |
|
$ |
861 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
861 |
|
$ |
— |
Total liabilities measured at fair value at December 31, 2016 |
|
$ |
861 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
861 |
|
$ |
— |
(1) |
Includes the retirement benefit agreement for a former Company associate. The agreement calls for the balance of the retirement benefit to be paid out to the former associate in ten annual installments, beginning in 2011. As such, the Company has paid the former associate a total of $1.2 million through March 31, 2017, which was reimbursed to the Company using funds from the related split life insurance policy noted above. These amounts are included in accrued payroll and employee benefits on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. |
11
Interest Rate Derivatives
The Company’s interest rate derivatives, which are not designated as effective cash flow hedges, consisted of the following at March 31, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value Asset |
||||
|
|
Strike / Capped |
|
Effective |
Maturity |
|
Notional |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
||||
Hedged Debt |
Type |
Rate |
Index |
Date |
Date |
|
Amount |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||||
Hilton San Diego Bayfront (1) |
Cap |
4.250 |
% |
1-Month LIBOR |
April 15, 2015 |
May 1, 2017 |
|
$ |
110,772 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
Hilton San Diego Bayfront (1) |
Cap |
4.250 |
% |
1-Month LIBOR |
May 1, 2017 |
May 1, 2019 |
|
$ |
N/A |
|
|
4 |
|
|
— |
$85.0 million term loan (2) |
Swap |
3.391 |
% |
1-Month LIBOR |
October 29, 2015 |
September 2, 2022 |
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
1,336 |
$100.0 million term loan (3) |
Swap |
3.653 |
% |
1-Month LIBOR |
January 29, 2016 |
January 31, 2023 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
811 |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,425 |
|
$ |
1,749 |
(1) |
In March 2017, the Company purchased a new interest rate cap agreement for $19,000 related to the loan secured by the Hilton San Diego Bayfront. The new agreement, whose terms are substantially the same as the terms under the old cap agreement, will effectively replace the old agreement on May 1, 2017. The fair values of both Hilton San Diego Bayfront cap agreements are included in other assets, net on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. |
(2) |
The fair value of the $85.0 million term loan swap agreement is included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The 1-month LIBOR rate was swapped to a fixed rate of 1.591%. |
(3) |
The fair value of the $100.0 million term loan swap agreement is included in other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The 1-month LIBOR rate was swapped to a fixed rate of 1.853%. |
Noncash changes in the fair values of the Company’s interest rate derivatives resulted in (decreases) increases to interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||
|
|
March 31, 2017 |
|
March 31, 2016 |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
||
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net |
|
$ |
(657) |
|
$ |
6,402 |
|
Fair Value of Debt
As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, 77.8% and 76.2%, respectively, of the Company’s outstanding debt had fixed interest rates, including the effects of interest rate swap agreements. The Company’s principal value of its consolidated debt totaled $1.0 billion and $0.9 billion as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Using Level 3 measurements, the Company estimates that the fair market value of its debt totaled $1.0 billion and $0.9 billion as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
6. Other Assets
Other assets, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
699 |
|
$ |
779 |
Goodwill |
|
|
990 |
|
|
990 |
Deferred expense on straight-lined third-party tenant leases |
|
|
2,853 |
|
|
2,876 |
Interest rate derivatives |
|
|
2,425 |
|
|
1,749 |
Other receivables |
|
|
1,491 |
|
|
1,673 |
Other |
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
1,322 |
Total other assets net |
|
$ |
9,945 |
|
$ |
9,389 |
The property and equipment, net noted above consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Cost basis |
|
$ |
10,843 |
|
$ |
10,807 |
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(10,144) |
|
|
(10,028) |
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
699 |
|
$ |
779 |
12
7. Notes Payable
Notes payable consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Notes payable requiring payments of interest and principal, with fixed rates ranging from 4.12% to 5.95%; maturing at dates ranging from November 2020 through January 2025. The notes are collateralized by first deeds of trust on four hotel properties at March 31, 2017, and five hotel properties at December 31, 2016. |
|
$ |
350,802 |
|
$ |
528,604 |
Note payable requiring payments of interest and principal, bearing a blended rate of one-month LIBOR plus 225 basis points; maturing in August 2019. The note is collateralized by a first deed of trust on one hotel property. |
|
|
221,544 |
|
|
222,340 |
Unsecured term loan requiring payments of interest only, with a blended interest rate based on a pricing grid with a range of 180 to 255 basis points over LIBOR, depending on the Company's leverage ratios. LIBOR has been swapped to a fixed rate of 1.591%, resulting in an effective interest rate of 3.391% based on the Company's current leverage. Matures in September 2022. |
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
85,000 |
Unsecured term loan requiring payments of interest only, with a blended interest rate based on a pricing grid with a range of 180 to 255 basis points over LIBOR, depending on the Company's leverage ratios. LIBOR has been swapped to a fixed rate of 1.853%, resulting in an effective interest rate of 3.653% based on the Company's current leverage. Matures in January 2023. |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
100,000 |
Unsecured Series A Senior Notes requiring semi-annual payments of interest only, bearing interest at 4.69%; maturing in January 2026. |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
— |
Unsecured Series B Senior Notes requiring semi-annual payments of interest only, bearing interest at 4.79%; maturing in January 2028. |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
— |
Total notes payable |
|
$ |
997,346 |
|
$ |
935,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of notes payable |
|
$ |
10,167 |
|
$ |
186,034 |
Less: current portion of deferred financing fees |
|
|
(1,269) |
|
|
(1,105) |
Carrying value of current portion of notes payable |
|
$ |
8,898 |
|
$ |
184,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable, less current portion |
|
$ |
987,179 |
|
$ |
749,910 |
Less: long-term portion of deferred financing fees |
|
|
(4,719) |
|
|
(3,536) |
Carrying value of notes payable, less current portion |
|
$ |
982,460 |
|
$ |
746,374 |
Notes Payable Transactions - 2017
In January 2017, the Company received proceeds of $240.0 million in a private placement of senior unsecured notes. The private placement consisted of $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.69%, maturing in January 2026 (the “Series A Senior Notes”), and $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.79%, maturing in January 2028 (the “Series B Senior Notes”, together the “Senior Notes”).
In January 2017, the Company used proceeds received from the Senior Notes to repay the loan secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf, which had a balance of $176.0 million and an interest rate of 5.58%. The Marriott Boston Long Wharf loan was scheduled to mature in April 2017, and was available to be repaid without penalty in January 2017.
Interest Expense
Total interest incurred and expensed on the notes payable was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
||
|
|
March 31, 2017 |
|
March 31, 2016 |
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
||
Interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
11,328 |
|
$ |
13,053 |
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net |
|
|
(657) |
|
|
6,402 |
Amortization of deferred financing fees |
|
|
578 |
|
|
555 |
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
11,249 |
|
$ |
20,010 |
13
8. Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities
Other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Property, sales and use taxes payable |
|
$ |
16,436 |
|
$ |
16,965 |
Income tax payable |
|
|
382 |
|
|
211 |
Accrued interest |
|
|
3,568 |
|
|
1,996 |
Advance deposits |
|
|
17,820 |
|
|
14,505 |
Management fees payable |
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
1,645 |
Other |
|
|
4,440 |
|
|
4,547 |
Total other current liabilities |
|
$ |
43,786 |
|
$ |
39,869 |
Other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred gain on sale of asset |
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
$ |
7,000 |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
6,149 |
|
|
6,045 |
Deferred rent |
|
|
19,748 |
|
|
19,807 |
Deferred incentive management fees |
|
|
201 |
|
|
— |
Other |
|
|
3,819 |
|
|
3,798 |
Total other liabilities |
|
$ |
36,917 |
|
$ |
36,650 |
9. Stockholders’ Equity
Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
In March 2016, the Company issued 4,600,000 shares of its 6.95% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series E preferred stock”) with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share for gross proceeds of $115.0 million. In conjunction with the offering, the Company incurred $4.0 million in preferred offering costs. On or after March 11, 2021, the Series E preferred stock will be redeemable at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends up to, but not including, the redemption date.
Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
In May 2016, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of its 6.45% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series F preferred stock) with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share for gross proceeds of $75.0 million. In conjunction with the offering, the Company incurred $2.6 million in preferred offering costs. On or after May 17, 2021, the Series F preferred stock will be redeemable at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends up to, but not including, the redemption date.
Common Stock
In February 2017, the Company entered into separate “At the Market” Agreements (the “ATM Agreements”) with each of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. In accordance with the terms of the ATM Agreements, the Company may from time to time offer and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $300.0 million. The Company did not issue any shares of its common stock in connection with the ATM Agreements during the three months ended March 31, 2017. As of March 31, 2017, the Company has $300.0 million available for sale under the ATM Agreements.
In February 2017, the Company’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase plan to acquire up to $300.0 million of the Company’s common and preferred stock. As of March 31, 2017, no shares of either the Company’s common or preferred stock have been repurchased. Future purchases will depend on various factors, including the Company’s capital needs, as well as the Company’s common and preferred stock price.
14
10. Long-Term Incentive Plan
Stock Grants
Restricted shares granted pursuant to the Company’s 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 1, 2014, generally vest over periods from three to five years from the date of grant.
Compensation expense related to awards of restricted shares are measured at fair value on the date of grant and amortized over the relevant requisite service period or derived service period.
In accordance with the Compensation Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. The Company’s amortization expense and forfeitures related to restricted shares for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
||
|
|
March 31, 2017 |
|
March 31, 2016 |
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
||
Amortization expense, including forfeitures |
|
$ |
1,749 |
|
$ |
1,614 |
In addition, the Company capitalizes compensation costs related to all restricted shares granted to certain employees who work on the design and construction of its hotels. During both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, these capitalized costs totaled $0.2 million.
Stock Options
In April 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s board of directors approved a grant of 200,000 non-qualified stock options (the “Options”) to one of the Company’s former associates. The Options fully vested in April 2009, and will expire in April 2018. The exercise price of the Options is $17.71 per share.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Management Agreements
Management agreements with the Company’s third-party hotel managers require the Company to pay between 1.75% and 3.5% of total revenue of the managed hotels to the third-party managers each month as a basic management fee. In addition to basic management fees, provided that certain operating thresholds are met, the Company may also be required to pay incentive management fees to certain of its third-party managers. Total basic management fees, net of key money incentives received from third-party hotel managers, along with incentive management fees incurred by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were included in other property-level expenses on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
||
|
|
March 31, 2017 |
|
March 31, 2016 |
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
||
Basic management fees |
|
$ |
7,895 |
|
$ |
7,667 |
Incentive management fees |
|
|
2,553 |
|
|
1,704 |
Total basic and incentive management fees |
|
$ |
10,448 |
|
$ |
9,371 |
License and Franchise Agreements
The Company has entered into license and franchise agreements related to certain of its hotel properties. The license and franchise agreements require the Company to, among other things, pay monthly fees that are calculated based on specified percentages of certain revenues. The license and franchise agreements generally contain specific standards for, and restrictions and limitations on, the operation and maintenance of the hotels which are established by the franchisors to maintain uniformity in the system created by each such franchisor. Such standards generally regulate the appearance of the hotel, quality and type of goods and services offered, signage and protection of trademarks. Compliance with such standards may from time to time require the Company to make significant expenditures for capital improvements.
15
Total license and franchise fees incurred by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were included in franchise costs on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
||
|
|
March 31, 2017 |
|
March 31, 2016 |
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
||
Franchise assessments (1) |
|
$ |
5,927 |
|
$ |
5,813 |
Franchise royalties |
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
2,283 |
Total franchise costs |
|
$ |
8,055 |
|
$ |
8,096 |
(1) |
Includes advertising, reservation and frequent guest club assessments. |
Renovation and Construction Commitments
At March 31, 2017, the Company had various contracts outstanding with third parties in connection with the renovation and repositioning of certain of its hotel properties. The remaining commitments under these contracts at March 31, 2017 totaled $46.1 million.
Capital Leases
The Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile is subject to a building lease which expires in December 2097. Upon acquisition of the hotel in June 2012, the Company evaluated the terms of the lease agreement and determined the lease to be a capital lease pursuant to the Leases Topic of the FASB ASC.
The capital lease asset was included in investment in hotel properties, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as follows (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Gross capital lease asset - buildings and improvements |
|
$ |
58,799 |
|
$ |
58,799 |
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(7,105) |
|
|
(6,738) |
Net capital lease asset - buildings and improvements |
|
$ |
51,694 |
|
$ |
52,061 |
Future minimum lease payments under the Company’s capital lease together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of March 31, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):
2017 |
|
$ |
1,403 |
2018 |
|
|
1,403 |
2019 |
|
|
1,403 |
2020 |
|
|
1,403 |
2021 |
|
|
1,403 |
Thereafter |
|
|
106,257 |
Total minimum lease payments (1) |
|
|
113,272 |
Less: Amount representing interest (2) |
|
|
(97,697) |
Present value of net minimum lease payments (3) |
|
$ |
15,575 |
(1) |
Minimum lease payments do not include percentage rent which may be paid under the Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile building lease on the basis of 4.0% of the hotel’s gross room revenues over a certain threshold. No percentage rent was due during either the three months ended March 31, 2017 or 2016. |
(2) |
Interest includes the amount necessary to reduce net minimum lease payments to present value calculated at the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at lease inception. |
(3) |
The present value of net minimum lease payments are presented on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2017 as a current obligation of $1,000, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses, and as a long-term obligation of $15.6 million, which is included in capital lease obligations, less current portion. |
Ground, Building and Air Leases
Total rent expense incurred pursuant to ground, building and air lease agreements for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was included in property tax, ground lease and insurance on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):
16
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
||
|
|
March 31, 2017 |
|
March 31, 2016 |
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
||
Minimum rent, including straight-line adjustments |
|
$ |
2,340 |
|
$ |
2,396 |
Percentage rent (1) |
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
2,060 |
Total |
|
$ |
3,925 |
|
$ |
4,456 |
(1) |
Several of the Company’s hotels pay percentage rent, which is calculated on operating revenues above certain thresholds. |
Rent expense incurred pursuant to a lease on the corporate facility totaled $0.1 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, and is included in corporate overhead expense.
Concentration of Risk
The concentration of the Company’s hotels in California, Illinois, Massachusetts and the greater Washington DC area exposes the Company’s business to economic conditions, competition and real and personal property tax rates unique to these locales. As of March 31, 2017, 16 of the Company’s 27 hotels were concentrated in California, Illinois, Massachusetts and the greater Washington DC area as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington DC |
|
|
|
California |
|
Illinois |
|
Massachusetts |
|
Area |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
Number of hotels |
|
7 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
Percentage of total rooms |
|
29 |
% |
9 |
% |
15 |
% |
14 |
% |
Percentage of total consolidated revenue during the past 12 months |
|
34 |
% |
7 |
% |
15 |
% |
14 |
% |
Other
The Company has provided customary unsecured environmental indemnities to certain lenders. The Company has performed due diligence on the potential environmental risks, including obtaining an independent environmental review from outside environmental consultants. These indemnities obligate the Company to reimburse the indemnified parties for damages related to certain environmental matters. There is no term or damage limitation on these indemnities; however, if an environmental matter arises, the Company could have recourse against other previous owners or a claim against its environmental insurance policies.
At March 31, 2017, the Company had $0.5 million of outstanding irrevocable letters of credit to guaranty the Company’s financial obligations related to workers’ compensation insurance programs from prior policy years. The beneficiaries of these letters of credit may draw upon these letters of credit in the event of a contractual default by the Company relating to each respective obligation. No draws have been made through March 31, 2017.
The Company is subject to various claims, lawsuits and legal proceedings, including routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, regarding the operation of its hotels and Company matters. While it is not possible to ascertain the ultimate outcome of such matters, the Company believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts covered by insurance will not have a material adverse impact on its financial condition or results of operations. The outcome of claims, lawsuits and legal proceedings brought against the Company, however, is subject to significant uncertainties.
17
Cautionary Statement
This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and includes this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe the Company’s future plans, strategies, opinions and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “project,” or similar expressions. You should not rely on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are, in some cases, beyond the Company’s control, and which could materially affect actual results, performances or achievements. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the Company’s expectations will be realized. In evaluating these statements, you should specifically consider the risks outlined in detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23, 2017, under the caption “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including but not limited to the following factors:
· |
general economic and business conditions, including a U.S. recession, changes in the European Union or global economic slowdown, which may diminish the desire for leisure travel or the need for business travel, as well as any type of flu or disease-related pandemic, affecting the lodging and travel industry, internationally, nationally and locally; |
· |
our need to operate as a REIT and comply with other applicable laws and regulations, including new laws, interpretations or court decisions that may change the federal tax laws or the federal income tax consequences of our qualification as a REIT; |
· |
rising hotel operating expenses, including the impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or its potential replacement, increases in minimum wages, changes in work rules or additional costs incurred from new or re-negotiated labor contracts; |
· |
relationships with, and the requirements and reputation of, our franchisors and hotel brands; |
· |
relationships with, and the requirements, performance and reputation of, the managers of our hotels; |
· |
the ground, building or air leases for six of the 27 hotels held for investment as of March 31, 2017; |
· |
competition for the acquisition of hotels, and our ability to complete acquisitions and dispositions; |
· |
performance of hotels after they are acquired; |
· |
new hotel supply, or alternative lodging options such as timeshare, vacation rentals or sharing services such as Airbnb, in our markets, which could harm our occupancy levels and revenue at our hotels; |
· |
competition from hotels not owned by us; |
· |
the need for renovations, repositionings and other capital expenditures for our hotels; |
· |
the impact, including any delays, of renovations and repositionings on hotel operations; |
· |
changes in our business strategy or acquisition or disposition plans; |
· |
our level of debt, including secured, unsecured, fixed and variable rate debt; |
· |
financial and other covenants in our debt and preferred stock; |
· |
our hotels and related goodwill may become impaired, or our hotels and related goodwill which have previously become impaired may become further impaired, in the future, which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations; |
· |
volatility in the capital markets and the effect on lodging demand or our ability to obtain capital on favorable terms or at all; |
· |
potential adverse tax consequences in the event that our operating leases with our taxable REIT subsidiaries are not held to have been made on an arm’s-length basis; |
· |
system security risks, data protection breaches, cyber-attacks, including those impacting our hotel managers or other third parties, and systems integration issues; and |
· |
other events beyond our control, including terrorist attacks or civil unrest. |
These factors may cause our actual events to differ materially from the expectations expressed or implied by any forward-looking statement. Except as otherwise required by federal securities laws, the Company disclaims any obligations or undertaking to publicly release any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein (or elsewhere) to reflect any change in the Company’s expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
18
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the “Company,” “we” or “us”) is a Maryland corporation. We operate as a self-managed and self-administered real estate investment trust (“REIT”). A REIT is a corporation that directly or indirectly owns real estate assets and has elected to be taxable as a real estate investment trust. To qualify for taxation as a REIT, the REIT must meet certain requirements, including regarding the composition of its assets and the sources of its income. REITs generally are not subject to federal income taxes at the corporate level as long as they pay stockholder dividends equivalent to 100% of their taxable income. REITs are required to distribute to stockholders at least 90% of their REIT taxable income. We own, directly or indirectly, 100% of the interests of Sunstone Hotel Partnership, LLC (the “Operating Partnership”), which is the entity that directly or indirectly owns our hotel properties. We also own 100% of the interests of our taxable REIT subsidiary, Sunstone Hotel TRS Lessee, Inc., which, directly or indirectly, leases all of our hotels from the Operating Partnership, and engages independent third-parties to manage our hotels.
We own primarily urban and resort upper upscale hotels in the United States. As of March 31, 2017, we had interests in 27 hotels (the “27 hotels”). Of the 27 hotels, we classify 24 as upper upscale, two as upscale and one as luxury as defined by Smith Travel Research, Inc. All but one (the Boston Park Plaza) of our 27 hotels are operated under nationally recognized brands such as Marriott, Hilton and Hyatt, which are among the most respected and widely recognized brands in the lodging industry. We believe the largest and most stable segment of travelers prefer the consistent service and quality associated with nationally recognized brands and well-known independent hotels.
We seek to own hotels primarily in urban and resort locations that benefit from significant barriers to entry by competitors and diverse economic drivers. As of March 31, 2017, the hotels comprising our 27 hotel portfolio average 490 rooms in size.
Our mission is to create meaningful value for our stockholders by producing superior long-term returns through the ownership of long-term relevant lodging real estate. Our values include transparency, trust, ethical conduct, honest communication and discipline. As demand for lodging generally fluctuates with the overall economy, we seek to own hotels that will maintain a high appeal with travelers over long periods of time and will generate economic earnings materially in excess of recurring capital requirements. Our strategy over the next several years is to maximize stockholder value through focused asset management and disciplined capital recycling, which is likely to include selective acquisitions and dispositions, while maintaining balance sheet flexibility and strength. Our goal is to maintain low leverage and high financial flexibility to position the Company to create value throughout all phases of the operating and financial cycles.
2017 Year-To-Date Highlights
In January 2017, we received proceeds of $240.0 million in a private placement of senior unsecured notes. The private placement consisted of $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.69%, maturing in January 2026 (the “Series A Senior Notes”), and $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.79%, maturing in January 2028 (the “Series B Senior Notes”, together the “Senior Notes”).
In January 2017, we used proceeds received from the Senior Notes to repay the loan secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf, which had a balance of $176.0 million and an interest rate of 5.58%. The Marriott Boston Long Wharf loan was scheduled to mature in April 2017, and was available to be repaid without penalty in January 2017.
In February 2017, we sold the 444-room Fairmont Newport Beach, California for net proceeds of $122.8 million, and recognized a net gain on the sale of $44.3 million. The sale did not represent a strategic shift that had a major impact on our business plan or our primary markets, and, therefore, did not qualify as a discontinued operation.
In February 2017, we entered into separate “At the Market” Agreements (the “ATM Agreements”) with each of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. In accordance with the terms of the ATM Agreements, we may from time to time offer and sell our shares of common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $300.0 million. As of March 31, 2017, we have not sold any shares under the ATM Agreements.
In February 2017, our board of directors authorized a share repurchase plan to acquire up to $300.0 million of our common and preferred stock. As of March 31, 2017, no shares of either our common or preferred stock have been repurchased. Future purchases will depend on various factors, including our capital needs, as well as our common and preferred stock price.
Operating Activities
Revenues. Substantially all of our revenues are derived from the operation of our hotels. Specifically, our revenues consist of the following:
19
· |
Room revenue, which is the product of the number of rooms sold and the average daily room rate, or “ADR”, as defined below; |
· |
Food and beverage revenue, which is comprised of revenue realized in the hotel food and beverage outlets as well as banquet and catering events; and |
· |
Other operating revenue, which includes ancillary hotel revenue and other items primarily driven by occupancy such as telephone/internet, parking, spa, resort and other facility fees, entertainment and other guest services. Additionally, this category includes, among other things, attrition revenue, tenant revenue derived from hotel space leased by third parties and any performance guarantee payments. |
Expenses. Our expenses consist of the following:
· |
Room expense, which is primarily driven by occupancy and, therefore, has a significant correlation with room revenue; |
· |
Food and beverage expense, which is primarily driven by food and beverage sales and banquet and catering bookings and, therefore, has a significant correlation with food and beverage revenue; |
· |
Other operating expense, which includes the corresponding expense of other operating revenue, advertising and promotion, repairs and maintenance, utilities, and franchise costs; |
· |
Property tax, ground lease and insurance expense, which includes the expenses associated with property tax, ground lease and insurance payments, each of which is primarily a fixed expense, however property tax is subject to regular revaluations based on the specific tax regulations and practices of each municipality; |
· |
Other property-level expenses, which includes our property-level general and administrative expenses, such as payroll and related costs, contract and professional fees, credit and collection expenses, employee recruitment, relocation and training expenses, management fees and other costs; |
· |
Corporate overhead expense, which includes our corporate-level expenses, such as payroll and related costs, amortization of deferred stock compensation, business acquisition and due diligence costs, legal expenses, contract and professional fees, entity-level state franchise and minimum taxes, travel expenses, office rent and other costs; and |
· |
Depreciation and amortization expense, which includes depreciation on our hotel buildings, improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment, along with amortization on our franchise fees and certain intangibles. Additionally, this category includes depreciation and amortization related to furniture, fixtures and equipment (“FF&E”) for our corporate office. |
Other Revenue and Expense. Other revenue and expense consists of the following:
· |
Interest and other income, which includes interest we have earned on our restricted and unrestricted cash accounts, as well as any energy or other rebates we have received, any miscellaneous income or any gains or losses we have recognized on sales or redemptions of assets other than real estate investments; |
· |
Interest expense, which includes interest expense incurred on our outstanding fixed and variable rate debt and capital lease obligation, gains or losses on derivatives, amortization of deferred financing fees, and any loan fees incurred on our debt; |
· |
Loss on extinguishment of debt, which includes losses recognized on amendments or early repayments of mortgages or other debt obligations from the accelerated amortization of deferred financing fees, along with any costs incurred; |
· |
Gain on sale of assets, which includes the gain we recognized on our sale of the Fairmont Newport Beach in February 2017, as the sale did not qualify as a discontinued operation; |
· |
Income tax provision, which includes federal and state income taxes related to continuing operations charged to the Company net of any refunds received, and any adjustments to unrecognized tax positions, along with any related interest and penalties incurred; |
· |
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest, which includes net income attributable to the outside 25.0% interest in the joint venture that owns the Hilton San Diego Bayfront; and |
· |
Preferred stock dividends, which includes dividends accrued on our Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series D preferred stock”) until its redemption in April 2016, as well as dividends accrued on our Series E preferred stock and our Series F preferred stock, both of which were issued in 2016. |
20
Operating Performance Indicators. The following performance indicators are commonly used in the hotel industry:
· |
Occupancy, which is the quotient of total rooms sold divided by total rooms available; |
· |
Average daily room rate, or ADR, which is the quotient of room revenue divided by total rooms sold; |
· |
Revenue per available room, or RevPAR, which is the product of occupancy and ADR, and does not include food and beverage revenue, or other operating revenue; |
· |
Comparable RevPAR, which we define as the RevPAR generated by hotels we owned as of the end of the reporting period, but excluding those hotels that we classified as held for sale, those hotels that are undergoing a material renovation or repositioning and those hotels whose room counts have materially changed during either the current or prior year. For hotels that were not owned for the entirety of the comparison periods, comparable RevPAR is calculated using RevPAR generated during periods of prior ownership. We refer to this subset of our hotels used to calculate comparable RevPAR as our “Comparable Portfolio.” Currently, our Comparable Portfolio includes all of the 27 hotels; |
· |
RevPAR index, which is the quotient of a hotel’s RevPAR divided by the average RevPAR of its competitors, multiplied by 100. A RevPAR index in excess of 100 indicates a hotel is achieving higher RevPAR than the average of its competitors. In addition to absolute RevPAR index, we monitor changes in RevPAR index; |
· |
EBITDA, which is net income (loss), excluding: noncontrolling interests; interest expense; benefit or provision for income taxes, including income taxes applicable to the sale of assets; and depreciation and amortization; |
· |
Adjusted EBITDA, which is EBITDA adjusted to exclude: amortization of deferred stock compensation; the impact of any gain or loss from asset sales; impairment charges; prior year property tax assessments or credits; and any other non-recurring identified adjustments; |
· |
Funds from operations (“FFO”) attributable to common stockholders, which is net income (loss), excluding: preferred stock dividends and any redemption charges; noncontrolling interests; gains and losses from sales of property; real estate-related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs); and real estate-related impairment losses; and |
· |
Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders, which is FFO attributable to common stockholders adjusted to exclude: penalties; written-off deferred financing costs; non-real estate-related impairment losses; income tax benefits or provisions associated with the application of net operating loss carryforwards and uncertain tax positions; and any other non-recurring identified adjustments. |
Factors Affecting Our Operating Results. The primary factors affecting our operating results include overall demand for hotel rooms, the pace of new hotel development, or supply, and the relative performance of our operators in increasing revenue and controlling hotel operating expenses.
· |
Demand. The demand for lodging generally fluctuates with the overall economy. In aggregate, demand for our hotels has improved each year since 2010. In 2016, Comparable Portfolio RevPAR, which was affected by significant repositionings at both the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort, increased 0.9% as compared to 2015, with a 20 basis point decrease in occupancy. With these two significant repositionings complete, our first quarter Comparable Portfolio RevPAR increased 5.5% in 2017 as compared to the first quarter of 2016, with a 10 basis point decrease in occupancy. |
· |
Supply. The addition of new competitive hotels affects the ability of existing hotels to absorb demand for lodging and, therefore, impacts the ability to drive RevPAR and profits. The development of new hotels is largely driven by construction costs and expected performance of existing hotels. In aggregate, we expect the U.S. hotel supply to increase over the near term. On a market-by-market basis, some markets may experience new hotel room openings at or greater than historic levels, including in Chicago, Houston, New York City and Washington DC where there are currently higher-than-average supplies of new hotel room openings. Additionally, an increase in the supply of vacation rental or sharing services such as Airbnb also affects the ability of existing hotels to absorb demand for lodging. |
· |
Revenues and expenses. We believe that marginal improvements in RevPAR index, even in the face of declining revenues, are a good indicator of the relative quality and appeal of our hotels, and our operators’ effectiveness in maximizing revenues. Similarly, we also evaluate our operators’ effectiveness in minimizing incremental operating expenses in the context of increasing revenues or, conversely, in reducing operating expenses in the context of declining revenues. |
21
With respect to improving RevPAR index, we continue to work with our hotel operators to optimize revenue management initiatives while taking into consideration market demand trends and the pricing strategies of competitor hotels in our markets. We also develop capital investment programs designed to ensure each of our hotels is well renovated and positioned to appeal to groups and individual travelers fitting target guest profiles. Increased capital investment in our properties may lead to short-term revenue disruption and negatively impact RevPAR index. Our revenue management initiatives are generally oriented towards maximizing ADR even if the result may be lower occupancy than may be achieved through lower ADR. Increases in RevPAR attributable to increases in ADR may be accompanied by minimal additional expenses, while increases in RevPAR attributable to higher occupancy may result in higher variable expenses such as housekeeping, labor and utilities expense. Our Comparable Portfolio RevPAR index increased 130 basis points during the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. The increase in our Comparable Portfolio RevPAR index was due in part to increased rates at our Boston Park Plaza and Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning and at our Renaissance Washington DC and Marriott Tysons Corner due to the Presidential inauguration and the Women’s March on Washington. These increases were partially offset by decreased rates at our Courtyard by Marriott Los Angeles and Renaissance Los Angeles Airport due to increased competition from area hotels that were under renovation during the first quarter of 2016.
We continue to work with our operators to identify operational efficiencies designed to reduce expenses while minimally affecting guest experience and hotel employee satisfaction. Key asset management initiatives include optimizing hotel staffing levels, increasing the efficiency of the hotels, such as installing energy efficient management and inventory control systems, and selectively combining certain food and beverage outlets. Our operational efficiency initiatives may be difficult to implement, as most categories of variable operating expenses, such as utilities and housekeeping labor costs, fluctuate with changes in occupancy. Furthermore, our hotels operate with significant fixed costs, such as general and administrative expense, insurance, property taxes, and other expenses associated with owning hotels, over which our operators have little control. We have experienced, either currently or in the past, increases in hourly wages, employee benefits (especially health insurance), utility costs and property insurance, which have negatively affected our operating margins. Moreover, there are limits to how far our operators can reduce expenses without affecting brand standards or the competitiveness of our hotels.
Operating Results. The following table presents our unaudited operating results for our total portfolio for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, including the amount and percentage change in the results between the two periods.
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
Change $ |
|
Change % |
|
|||
|
|
(unaudited and in thousands, except statistical data) |
|
|||||||||
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Room |
|
$ |
190,367 |
|
$ |
187,297 |
|
$ |
3,070 |
|
1.6 |
% |
Food and beverage |
|
|
75,501 |
|
|
71,234 |
|
|
4,267 |
|
6.0 |
% |
Other operating |
|
|
14,875 |
|
|
15,761 |
|
|
(886) |
|
(5.6) |
% |
Total revenues |
|
|
280,743 |
|
|
274,292 |
|
|
6,451 |
|
2.4 |
% |
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel operating |
|
|
168,137 |
|
|
171,736 |
|
|
(3,599) |
|
(2.1) |
% |
Other property-level expenses |
|
|
34,738 |
|
|
34,713 |
|
|
25 |
|
0.1 |
% |
Corporate overhead |
|
|
6,779 |
|
|
6,717 |
|
|
62 |
|
0.9 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
40,807 |
|
|
40,047 |
|
|
760 |
|
1.9 |
% |
Total operating expenses |
|
|
250,461 |
|
|
253,213 |
|
|
(2,752) |
|
(1.1) |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
30,282 |
|
|
21,079 |
|
|
9,203 |
|
43.7 |
% |
Interest and other income |
|
|
721 |
|
|
489 |
|
|
232 |
|
47.4 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(11,249) |
|
|
(20,010) |
|
|
8,761 |
|
43.8 |
% |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(4) |
|
|
(105) |
|
|
101 |
|
96.2 |
% |
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
44,285 |
|
|
— |
|
|
44,285 |
|
100.0 |
% |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
64,035 |
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
62,582 |
|
4,307.1 |
% |
Income tax provision |
|
|
(208) |
|
|
(237) |
|
|
29 |
|
12.2 |
% |
NET INCOME |
|
|
63,827 |
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
62,611 |
|
5,148.9 |
% |
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(1,992) |
|
|
(1,650) |
|
|
(342) |
|
(20.7) |
% |
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(3,207) |
|
|
(2,766) |
|
|
(441) |
|
(15.9) |
% |
INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
58,628 |
|
$ |
(3,200) |
|
$ |
61,828 |
|
1,932.1 |
% |
Operating Statistics. The following table includes comparisons of the key operating metrics for our Comparable Portfolio (27 hotels).
22
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
Change |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Occ% |
|
ADR |
|
RevPAR |
|
Occ% |
|
ADR |
|
RevPAR |
|
Occ% |
|
ADR |
|
RevPAR |
|
||||
Total Portfolio |
|
77.7 |
% |
$ |
203.48 |
|
$ |
158.10 |
|
77.8 |
% |
$ |
192.54 |
|
$ |
149.80 |
|
(10) |
bps |
5.7 |
% |
5.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Room revenue. Room revenue increased $3.1 million, or 1.6%, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 as follows:
Room revenue generated by the 27 hotels we owned as of March 31, 2017 (our “Existing Portfolio”), increased $8.4 million during the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 due to an increase in ADR ($8.6 million), partially offset by a decrease in occupancy ($0.2 million). The increase in ADR was primarily driven by strong demand, allowing for double-digit ADR growth in Park City, Orlando, San Diego and Washington DC. In addition, both the Renaissance Washington DC and the Marriott Tysons Corner experienced double digit ADR growth as a result of the Presidential inauguration and the Women’s March on Washington. Finally, both the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort experienced double digit ADR growth post-repositioning. During the first quarter of 2016, 4,377 room nights were out of service at the Boston Park Plaza, displacing approximately $0.8 million in room revenue based on the hotel achieving a potential 60.5% occupancy rate and RevPAR of $88.40 without the renovation. These increases to ADR were partially offset by weak Boston and Chicago markets, increased competition in New York City and a weak energy market in Houston.
The decrease in our Existing Portfolio’s occupancy during the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was caused by 15,848 fewer transient room nights, partially offset by 6,711 more group room nights. Transient room nights decreased due to a weak Chicago market combined with excess supply, as well as several of our hotels who pushed transient rate at the expense of occupancy. Group room nights increased, to the detriment of transient room nights, in Baltimore, Boston, New Orleans, Newport Beach and Orlando. In addition, the Houston hotels experienced a decrease in group room nights due to a weak energy market.
The increase in our Existing Portfolio’s room revenue was partially offset by the impact on revenue from our sales of the Sheraton Cerritos in May 2016 and the Fairmont Newport Beach in February 2017 (the “Two Sold Hotels”). The sale of the Two Sold Hotels caused room revenue to decrease by $5.3 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.
Food and beverage revenue. Food and beverage revenue increased $4.3 million, or 6.0%, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 as follows:
Food and beverage revenue generated by our Existing Portfolio increased $6.3 million during the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to increased banquet and outlet revenue caused by the increase in group room nights. In addition, both banquet and outlet revenue increased at the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort due to additional restaurant and meeting space options available post-repositioning, and the Hyatt Regency San Francisco due to the redesign of certain restaurant and lounge areas and the introduction of a new grab-and-go concept. These increases were partially offset by temporary decreases in outlet revenue due to restaurant renovations during the first quarter of 2017 at the Marriott Quincy and the Renaissance Los Angeles Airport, as well as decreased banquet revenue at the Marriott Quincy due to renovation of the function space during the first quarter of 2017, and at the Hilton Times Square due to the elimination of meeting space during 2016. In addition, room service revenue decreased at both the Hilton Times Square and the Hyatt Regency San Francisco due to the elimination of this dining option.
The increase in our Existing Portfolio’s food and beverage revenue was partially offset by the Two Sold Hotels, which caused food and beverage revenue to decrease by $2.0 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.
Other operating revenue. Other operating revenue decreased $0.9 million, or 5.6%, for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 as follows:
Other operating revenue in our Existing Portfolio decreased $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to decreases in parking revenue, resort fees, spa revenue, telephone/internet revenue and tenant lease revenue. These decreases in other operating revenue during the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 were partially offset by increased retail revenue at the Wailea Beach Resort, combined with increases in attrition and cancellation revenue at several hotels.
The Two Sold Hotels caused other operating revenue to decrease by $0.4 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.
Hotel operating expenses. Hotel operating expenses, which are comprised of room, food and beverage, advertising and promotion, repairs and maintenance, utilities, franchise costs, property tax, ground lease and insurance, and other hotel operating expenses decreased $3.6 million, or 2.1%, during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 as follows:
23
The Two Sold Hotels caused hotel operating expenses to decrease by $4.9 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.
Hotel operating expenses in our Existing Portfolio increased $1.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. This increase is primarily related to the corresponding increases in room revenue, food and beverage revenue and retail revenue. In addition, hotel operating expenses in our Existing Portfolio increased in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 due to the following increased expenses: advertising and promotion due to increased payroll and related costs in this department, combined with increased group booking fees and increased controllable expenses such as marketing and public relations; franchise costs due to the increase in revenues; building rent at the Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile due to an operating expense credit received from the landlord in the first quarter of 2016; and Hawaii general excise tax (“GET”) due to higher revenue at the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning. These increases in hotel operating expenses were partially offset by the following decreased expenses: property taxes due to decreased assessments and appeal fees at several hotels; ground lease expense at the Hilton San Diego Bayfront and the Hilton Times Square; utilities due to a higher than average temperatures during the first quarter of 2017 in the Midwest and East; and spa expense due to the corresponding decline in spa revenue.
Other property-level expenses. Other property-level expenses increased $25,000, or 0.1%, during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 as follows:
Other property-level expenses in our Existing Portfolio increased $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to increases in the following expenses caused by higher revenue: management fees; credit and collection expenses; and supplies. Partially offsetting these increased expenses, both contract and professional fees and license and permit costs decreased during the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.
The Two Sold Hotels caused other property-level expenses to decrease by $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.
Corporate overhead expense. Corporate overhead expense increased $0.1 million, or 0.9%, during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016, primarily due to increased GET recognized during the first quarter of 2017 related to a $5.0 million performance guarantee provided by the manager of the Wailea Beach Resort, combined with increased deferred stock compensation expense and employee relations, recruitment and relocation expense. These increases in corporate overhead expense during the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 were partially offset by decreased payroll and related costs.
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.8 million, or 1.9%, during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 as follows:
Depreciation and amortization expense in our Existing Portfolio increased $2.2 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, due to additional depreciation recognized at the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning.
The Two Sold Hotels caused depreciation and amortization to decrease by $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.
Interest and other income. Interest and other income totaled $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, and $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. During the first quarter of 2017, we recognized $0.4 million in interest and miscellaneous income. In addition, we recognized $0.3 million in earn-out proceeds related to the Royal Palm Miami Beach, which we sold in 2011. At the time of the sale of the Royal Palm Miami Beach, we retained an earn-out right which enabled us to receive future payments of up to $20.0 million in the event that the hotel achieved certain return hurdles. With the receipt of the $0.3 million during the first quarter of 2017, the earn-out is complete.
In the first quarter of 2016, we recognized $0.3 million in interest and miscellaneous income and $0.2 million in energy rebates due to energy efficient renovations at our hotels.
Interest expense. We incurred interest expense as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||
Interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
11,328 |
|
$ |
13,053 |
|
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net |
|
|
(657) |
|
|
6,402 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees |
|
|
578 |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
$ |
11,249 |
|
$ |
20,010 |
|
24
Interest expense decreased $8.8 million, or 43.8%, during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016. Interest expense on our debt and capital lease obligations decreased $1.7 million in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 as a result of lower balances due to monthly amortization and loan repayments during 2016 and 2017. Partially offsetting these decreases, interest expense on our debt and capital lease obligations increased due to higher interest on our variable rate debt, as well as interest on our Senior Notes issued in January 2017. In addition, interest expense decreased $7.1 million as we recognized a $0.7 million gain on our interest rate derivatives during the first quarter of 2017 and a loss of $6.4 million on our interest rate derivatives during the first quarter of 2016.
Our weighted average interest rate per annum, including our variable rate debt obligation, was approximately 4.2% and 4.4% at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Approximately 77.8% and 79.3% of our outstanding notes payable had fixed interest rates at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
For information regarding our 2017 debt transactions, see the discussion included in “Liquidity and Capital Resources-Debt.”
Loss on extinguishment of debt. Loss on extinguishment of debt totaled $4,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017, and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. During the first quarter of 2017, we recognized a loss of $4,000 related to our repayment of debt secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf. During the first quarter of 2017, we recognized a loss of $0.1 million related to our repayment of debt secured by the Boston Park Plaza.
Gain on sale of assets. Gain on sale of assets totaled $44.3 million and zero for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. During the first quarter of 2017, we sold the Fairmont Newport Beach for net proceeds of $122.8 million, and recognized a net gain on the sale of $44.3 million. The sale of the Fairmont Newport Beach did not qualify as a discontinued operation.
Income tax provision. Income tax provision totaled $0.2 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. We lease our hotels to the TRS Lessee and its subsidiaries, which are subject to federal and state income taxes. In addition, the REIT and Operating Partnership may also be subject to various state and local income taxes. During the first quarter of 2017, we recognized combined federal and state income tax expense based on 2017 projected taxable income net of operating loss carryforwards for our taxable entities.
During the first quarter of 2016, we recognized combined federal and state income tax expense of $0.2 million based on 2016 projected taxable income net of operating loss carryforwards for our taxable entities.
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest. Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest totaled $2.0 million and $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Consistent with the Presentation Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), our net income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 includes 100% of the net income generated by the entity that owns the Hilton San Diego Bayfront. The outside 25.0% interest in the entity that owns the Hilton San Diego Bayfront earned net income of $2.0 million and $1.7 million during the first quarter of 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Preferred stock dividends. Preferred stock dividends were paid as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||
Series D preferred stock |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
2,300 |
|
Series E preferred stock |
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
466 |
|
Series F preferred stock |
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
$ |
3,207 |
|
$ |
2,766 |
|
We redeemed all 4,600,000 shares of our Series D preferred stock in April 2016. In March 2016, we issued 4,600,000 shares of Series E preferred stock, and in May 2016, we issued 3,000,000 shares of Series F preferred stock.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures. We use the following “non-GAAP financial measures” that we believe are useful to investors as key supplemental measures of our operating performance: EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, FFO attributable to common stockholders, Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders and Comparable Portfolio revenues. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, FFO attributable to common stockholders, Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders and Comparable Portfolio revenues, as calculated by us, may not be comparable to other companies that do not define such terms exactly as the Company. These non-GAAP measures are used in addition to and in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP. They should not be considered as alternatives to operating profit, cash flow from operations, or any other operating performance measure prescribed by GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures reflect additional ways of viewing our operations that we believe, when viewed with our GAAP results and the reconciliations to the corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting
25
our business than could be obtained absent this disclosure. For example, we believe that Comparable Portfolio revenues are useful to both us and investors in evaluating our operating performance by removing the impact of non-hotel results such as the amortization of favorable and unfavorable tenant lease contracts. We also believe that our use of Comparable Portfolio revenues is useful to both us and our investors as it facilitates the comparison of our operating results from period to period by removing fluctuations caused by any acquisitions or dispositions, as well as by those hotels that we classify as held for sale, those hotels that are undergoing a material renovation or repositioning and those hotels whose room counts have materially changed during either the current or prior year. We strongly encourage investors to review our financial information in its entirety and not to rely on a single financial measure.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are commonly used measures of performance in many industries. We believe EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance because these measures help investors evaluate and compare the results of our operations from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest expense) and our asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization) from our operating results. We also believe the use of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA facilitate comparisons between us and other lodging REITs, hotel owners who are not REITs and other capital-intensive companies. In addition, certain covenants included in our indebtedness use EBITDA as a measure of financial compliance. We also use EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as measures in determining the value of hotel acquisitions and dispositions.
Historically, we have adjusted EBITDA when evaluating our performance because we believe that the exclusion of certain additional items described below provides useful information to investors regarding our operating performance, and that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, when combined with the primary GAAP presentation of net income, is beneficial to an investor’s complete understanding of our operating performance. We adjust EBITDA for the following items, which may occur in any period, and refer to this measure as Adjusted EBITDA:
· |
Amortization of deferred stock compensation: we exclude the noncash expense incurred with the amortization of deferred stock compensation as this expense is based on historical stock prices at the date of grant to our corporate employees and does not reflect the underlying performance of our hotels. |
· |
Amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts: we exclude the noncash amortization of the favorable management contract asset recorded in conjunction with our acquisition of the Hilton Garden Inn Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile, along with the favorable and unfavorable tenant lease contracts, as applicable, recorded in conjunction with our acquisitions of the Boston Park Plaza, the Hilton Garden Inn Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile, the Hilton New Orleans St. Charles, the Hyatt Regency San Francisco and the Wailea Beach Resort. We exclude the noncash amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts because it is based on historical cost accounting and is of lesser significance in evaluating our actual performance for the current period. |
· |
Ground rent adjustments: we exclude the noncash expense incurred from straight-lining our ground lease obligations as this expense does not reflect the actual rent amounts due to the respective lessors in the current period and is of lesser significance in evaluating our actual performance for the current period. We do, however, include an adjustment for the cash ground lease expense recorded on the Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile’s building lease. Upon acquisition of this hotel, we determined that the building lease was a capital lease, and, therefore, we include a portion of the capital lease payment each month in interest expense. We include an adjustment for ground lease expense on capital leases in order to more accurately reflect the actual rent due to the hotel’s lessor in the current period, as well as the operating performance of the Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile. |
· |
Real estate transactions: we exclude the effect of gains and losses on the disposition of depreciable assets because we believe that including them in Adjusted EBITDA is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our assets. In addition, material gains or losses from the depreciated value of the disposed assets could be less important to investors given that the depreciated asset value often does not reflect its market value. |
· |
Gains or losses from debt transactions: we exclude the effect of finance charges and premiums associated with the extinguishment of debt, including the acceleration of deferred financing costs from the original issuance of the debt being redeemed or retired because, like interest expense, their removal helps investors evaluate and compare the results of our operations from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure. |
· |
Acquisition costs: under GAAP, costs associated with completed acquisitions that meet the definition of a business in accordance with the Business Combinations Topic of the FASB ASC are expensed in the year incurred. We exclude the effect of these costs because we believe they are not reflective of the ongoing performance of the Company or our hotels. |
· |
Noncontrolling interest: we deduct the noncontrolling partner’s pro rata share of any EBITDA adjustments related to our consolidated Hilton San Diego Bayfront partnership. |
· |
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle: from time to time, the FASB promulgates new accounting standards that require the consolidated statement of operations to reflect the cumulative effect of a change in accounting |
26
principle. We exclude these one-time adjustments, which include the accounting impact from prior periods, because they do not reflect our actual performance for that period. |
· |
Impairment losses: we exclude the effect of impairment losses because we believe that including them in Adjusted EBITDA is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our remaining assets. In addition, we believe that impairment charges, which are based off of historical cost account values, are similar to gains (losses) on dispositions and depreciation expense, both of which are also excluded from Adjusted EBITDA. |
· |
Other adjustments: we exclude other adjustments that we believe are outside the ordinary course of business because we do not believe these costs reflect our actual performance for that period and/or the ongoing operations of our hotels. Such items may include: lawsuit settlement costs; prior year property tax assessments or credits; property-level restructuring, severance and management transition costs; lease terminations; and any gains or losses we have recognized on sales or redemptions of assets other than real estate investments. |
The following table reconciles our unaudited net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for our hotel portfolio for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
63,827 |
|
$ |
1,216 |
Operations held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
40,807 |
|
|
40,047 |
Amortization of lease intangibles |
|
|
63 |
|
|
63 |
Interest expense |
|
|
11,249 |
|
|
20,010 |
Income tax provision |
|
|
208 |
|
|
237 |
Noncontrolling interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(1,992) |
|
|
(1,650) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(875) |
|
|
(865) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(457) |
|
|
(413) |
EBITDA |
|
|
112,830 |
|
|
58,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred stock compensation |
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
1,614 |
Amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts, net |
|
|
99 |
|
|
(4) |
Noncash ground rent |
|
|
(275) |
|
|
488 |
Capital lease obligation interest — cash ground rent |
|
|
(351) |
|
|
(351) |
Gain on sale of assets, net |
|
|
(44,570) |
|
|
(7) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
4 |
|
|
105 |
Prior year property tax adjustments, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
(97) |
Property-level restructuring, severance and management transition costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,560 |
Noncontrolling interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash ground rent |
|
|
72 |
|
|
(113) |
|
|
|
(43,272) |
|
|
3,195 |
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
69,558 |
|
$ |
61,840 |
Adjusted EBITDA was $69.6 million and $61.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. Adjusted EBITDA increased $7.7 million the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 in part due to additional earnings generated by the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning, combined with increased earnings at our Park City, Orlando, San Diego and Washington DC hotels due to strong demand at these locales. Partially offsetting these increases, Adjusted EBITDA decreased primarily due to the sales of the Fairmont Newport Beach and the Sheraton Cerritos in February 2017 and May 2016, respectively. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA was negatively impacted during the three months ended March 31, 2017 by weak Boston and Chicago markets, increased competition in New York City and a weak energy market in Houston.
We believe that the presentation of FFO attributable to common stockholders provides useful information to investors regarding our operating performance because it is a measure of our operations without regard to specified noncash items such as real estate depreciation and amortization, amortization of lease intangibles, any real estate impairment loss and any gain or loss on sale of real estate assets, all of which are based on historical cost accounting and may be of lesser significance in evaluating our current performance. Our presentation of FFO attributable to common stockholders conforms to the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts’ (“NAREIT”) definition of “FFO applicable to common shares.” Our presentation may not be comparable to FFO
27
reported by other REITs that do not define the terms in accordance with the current NAREIT definition, or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do.
We also present Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders when evaluating our operating performance because we believe that the exclusion of certain additional items described below provides useful supplemental information to investors regarding our ongoing operating performance, and may facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and our peer companies. We adjust FFO attributable to common stockholders for the following items, which may occur in any period, and refer to this measure as Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders:
· |
Amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts: we exclude the noncash amortization of the favorable management contract asset recorded in conjunction with our acquisition of the Hilton Garden Inn Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile, along with the favorable and unfavorable tenant lease contracts, as applicable, recorded in conjunction with our acquisitions of the Boston Park Plaza, the Hilton Garden Inn Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile, the Hilton New Orleans St. Charles, the Hyatt Regency San Francisco and the Wailea Beach Resort. We exclude the noncash amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts because it is based on historical cost accounting and is of lesser significance in evaluating our actual performance for the current period. |
· |
Noncash ground rent adjustments: we exclude the noncash expense incurred from straight-lining our ground lease obligations as this expense does not reflect the actual rent amounts due to the respective lessors in the current period and is of lesser significance in evaluating our actual performance for the current period. |
· |
Gains or losses from debt transactions: we exclude the effect of finance charges and premiums associated with the extinguishment of debt, including the acceleration of deferred financing costs from the original issuance of the debt being redeemed or retired, as well as the noncash gains or losses on our derivatives. We believe that these items are not reflective of our ongoing finance costs. |
· |
Acquisition costs: under GAAP, costs associated with completed acquisitions that meet the definition of a business in accordance with the Business Combinations Topic of the FASB ASC are expensed in the year incurred. We exclude the effect of these costs because we believe they are not reflective of the ongoing performance of the Company or our hotels. |
· |
Impairment losses: we exclude the effect of non-real estate impairment losses because we believe that including them in Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders is not consistent with reflecting the ongoing performance of our remaining assets. |
· |
Noncontrolling interest: we deduct the noncontrolling partner’s pro rata share of any FFO adjustments related to our consolidated Hilton San Diego Bayfront partnership. |
· |
Other adjustments: we exclude other adjustments that we believe are outside the ordinary course of business because we do not believe these costs reflect our actual performance for that period and/or the ongoing operations of our hotels. Such items may include: lawsuit settlement costs; prior year property tax assessments or credits; property-level restructuring, severance and management transition costs; lease terminations; any gains or losses we have recognized on redemptions of assets other than real estate investments; and income tax benefits or provisions associated with the application of net operating loss carryforwards, uncertain tax positions or with the sale of assets other than real estate investments. |
28
The following table reconciles our unaudited net income to FFO attributable to common stockholders and Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders for our hotel portfolio for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
63,827 |
|
$ |
1,216 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(3,207) |
|
|
(2,766) |
|
Operations held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
40,678 |
|
|
39,893 |
|
Amortization of lease intangibles |
|
|
63 |
|
|
63 |
|
Gain on sale of assets, net |
|
|
(44,570) |
|
|
(7) |
|
Noncontrolling interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from consolidated joint venture attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(1,992) |
|
|
(1,650) |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(875) |
|
|
(865) |
|
FFO attributable to common stockholders |
|
|
53,924 |
|
|
35,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations held for investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of favorable and unfavorable contracts, net |
|
|
99 |
|
|
(4) |
|
Noncash ground rent |
|
|
(275) |
|
|
488 |
|
Noncash interest related to (gain) loss on derivatives, net |
|
|
(657) |
|
|
6,402 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
4 |
|
|
105 |
|
Prior year property tax adjustments, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
(97) |
|
Property-level restructuring, severance and management transition costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,560 |
|
Noncontrolling interest: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash ground rent |
|
|
72 |
|
|
(113) |
|
Noncash interest related to loss on derivative |
|
|
(4) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
(761) |
|
|
8,341 |
|
Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
53,163 |
|
$ |
44,225 |
|
Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders was $53.2 million and $44.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders increased $8.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to the same reasons noted in the discussion regarding Adjusted EBITDA. In addition, Adjusted FFO attributable to common stockholders increased in the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 due to a decrease in interest expense.
Investing Activities
Acquisitions. We did not acquire any hotels during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. While our primary focus is on acquiring urban and resort upper upscale hotels, our acquisition program is aimed at generating attractive risk-adjusted returns on our investment dollars, and therefore we may target lodging assets outside of the typical branded, urban, upper upscale and resort profile represented by our Existing Portfolio in order to capitalize on opportunities which may arise. We intend to select the brandings and operators for our hotels that we believe will lead to the highest returns. Additionally, the scope of our acquisitions program may include large hotel portfolios or hotel loans. Future acquisitions, if any, may be funded with cash on hand, by our issuance of additional debt or equity securities, including our common and preferred OP units provided that our stock price is at an attractive level, by draws on our $400.0 million senior unsecured credit facility, or by proceeds received from sales of existing assets.
Dispositions. We have from time to time divested of assets that no longer fit our target profile, will not offer long-term returns in excess of our cost of capital, will achieve a sale price in excess of our internal valuation, or that have high risk relative to their anticipated returns. In February 2017, we sold the 444-room Fairmont Newport Beach for net proceeds of $122.8 million, and recognized a net gain on the sale of $44.3 million. In May 2016, we sold the 203-room Sheraton Cerritos for net proceeds of $41.2 million, and recognized a net gain on the sale of $18.2 million. Neither of these two sales represented a strategic shift that had a major impact on our business plan or our primary markets; therefore, neither of these two sales qualified as a discontinued operation.
Renovations. We invested $29.9 million and $48.8 million in capital improvements to our hotel portfolio during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Consistent with our strategy, during the first three months of 2017 and 2016, we undertook major renovations, repositionings and ordinary course rooms, restaurants and public space renovations. None of our first quarter 2017 renovations caused room revenue disruption; however, during the first quarter of 2016 our repositioning of the Boston Park Plaza caused room revenue disruption of approximately $0.8 million, all of which was in line with our expectations.
29
Liquidity and Capital Resources
During the periods presented, our sources of cash included our operating activities and working capital, as well as proceeds from our sale of the Fairmont Newport Beach, sales of other assets, our term loan agreement drawn in January 2016, our Senior Notes and our preferred stock offering. Our primary uses of cash were for capital expenditures for hotels, operating expenses, repayment of notes payable, dividends and distributions on our common and preferred stock and distributions to our joint venture partner. We cannot be certain that traditional sources of funds will be available in the future.
Operating activities. Our net cash provided by or used in operating activities fluctuates primarily as a result of changes in RevPAR and the operating cash flow of our hotels. Our net cash provided by or used in operating activities may also be affected by changes in our portfolio resulting from hotel acquisitions, dispositions or renovations. Net cash provided by operating activities was $44.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to $43.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The net increase to cash provided by operating activities during the first three months of 2017 was primarily due to increased cash generated by our hotels, most significantly at the Boston Park Plaza and the Wailea Beach Resort post-repositioning, partially offset by decreased cash generated due to our sales of the Fairmont Newport Beach and the Sheraton Cerritos.
Investing activities. Our net cash provided by or used in investing activities fluctuates primarily as a result of acquisitions, dispositions and renovations of hotels. Net cash provided by or used in investing activities during the first three months of 2017 as compared to the first three months of 2016 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||
|
|
March 31, 2017 |
|
March 31, 2016 |
|
||
Proceeds from sales of assets |
|
$ |
123,117 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
Restricted cash — replacement reserve |
|
|
(504) |
|
|
(309) |
|
Renovations and additions to hotel properties |
|
|
(29,872) |
|
|
(48,818) |
|
Payment for interest rate derivative |
|
|
(19) |
|
|
— |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
$ |
92,722 |
|
$ |
(49,120) |
|
Net cash provided by investing activities was $92.7 million during the first three months of 2017 as compared to net cash used of $49.1 million for the same period in 2016. During the first quarter of 2017, we received proceeds of $123.1 million from our sales of the Fairmont Newport Beach and surplus FF&E, along with the earn-out proceeds received related to the sale of the Royal Palm Miami Beach. These cash inflows were partially offset as we increased our restricted cash replacement reserve accounts by $0.5 million, paid $29.9 million for renovations and additions to our portfolio and paid $19,000 for an interest rate cap agreement on our variable-rate mortgage secured by the Hilton San Diego Bayfront.
During the first quarter of 2016, we increased our restricted cash replacement reserve accounts by $0.3 million and paid $48.8 million for renovations and additions to our portfolio. These cash outflows were slightly offset by $7,000 received from the sale of surplus FF&E.
Financing activities. Our net cash provided by or used in financing activities fluctuates primarily as a result of our issuance of common stock, our issuance and repayment of notes payable and our credit facility, and our issuance and redemption of other forms of capital, including preferred equity. Net cash used in financing activities during the first three months of 2017 as compared to the first three months of 2016 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
||
|
|
March 31, 2017 |
|
March 31, 2016 |
||
Proceeds from preferred stock offerings |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
115,000 |
Payment of preferred stock offering costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
(4,016) |
Repurchase of common stock for employee withholding obligations |
|
|
(3,793) |
|
|
(2,641) |
Proceeds from notes payable |
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
100,000 |
Payments on notes payable |
|
|
(178,599) |
|
|
(117,558) |
Payments of deferred financing costs |
|
|
(13) |
|
|
(78) |
Dividends and distributions paid |
|
|
(119,847) |
|
|
(186,301) |
Distributions to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(2,325) |
|
|
(775) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
$ |
(64,577) |
|
$ |
(96,369) |
Net cash used in financing activities was $64.6 million for the first three months of 2017 as compared to $96.4 million for the first three months of 2016. Net cash used in financing activities during the first three months of 2017 consisted of the following cash outflows: $3.8 million paid to repurchase common shares to satisfy the statutory minimum federal and state tax obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted common shares issued to employees; $178.6 million in principal payments on our notes payable, including $176.0 million for the loan secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf and $2.6 million in principal payments on our notes payable; $13,000 in deferred financing costs related to our Senior Notes and our credit facility; $119.8 million in dividends
30
and distributions to our common and preferred stockholders; and $2.3 million in distributions to the noncontrolling interest in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront. These cash outflows were partially offset by $240.0 million in proceeds received from the Senior Notes.
Net cash used in financing activities during the first three months of 2016 consisted of the following cash outflows: $2.6 million paid to repurchase common shares to satisfy the statutory minimum federal and state tax obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted common shares issued to employees; $117.6 million in principal payments on our notes payable, including $114.2 million for the loan secured by the Boston Park Plaza and $3.4 million in principal payments on our notes payable; $0.1 million in deferred financing costs related to our $100.0 million unsecured term loan; $186.3 million in dividends and distributions to our common and preferred stockholders; and $0.8 million in distributions to the noncontrolling interest in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront. These cash outflows were slightly offset by $111.0 million in net proceeds received from the issuance of our Series E preferred stock, and $100.0 million in proceeds received from our unsecured term loan.
Future. We expect our primary uses of cash to be for operating expenses, capital investments in our hotels, repayment of principal on our notes payable and credit facility, interest expense, dividends and distributions on our common and preferred stock, potential repurchases of our common stock, and acquisitions of hotels, including possibly hotel portfolios. We expect our primary sources of cash will continue to be our operating activities, working capital, notes payable and our credit facility, dispositions of hotel properties, and proceeds from public and private offerings of debt securities and common and preferred stock. Our financial objectives include the maintenance of our credit ratios, appropriate levels of liquidity and continued balance sheet strength. Consistent with maintaining our low leverage and balance sheet strength, in the near-term, we expect to fund future acquisitions, if any, largely through cash on hand, the issuance of common or preferred equity, provided that our stock price is at an attractive level, or by proceeds received from sales of existing assets in order to selectively grow the quality and scale of our portfolio. Our ability to raise funds through the issuance of equity securities depends on, among other things, general market conditions for hotel companies and REITs and market perceptions about us. We will continue to analyze alternate sources of capital in an effort to minimize our capital costs and maximize our financial flexibility, including pursuant to the ATM agreements we entered into in February 2017. Under the terms of the agreements, we may issue and sell from time to time through or to the managers, as sales agents and/or principals, shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering amount of up to $300.0 million. Through March 31, 2017, we have not issued or sold any shares of our common stock under the agreements. However, when needed, the capital markets may not be available to us on favorable terms or at all.
Cash Balance. As of March 31, 2017, our unrestricted cash balance was $441.8 million. By minimizing our need to access external capital by maintaining higher than typical cash balances, our financial security and flexibility are meaningfully enhanced because we are able to fund our business needs (including payment of cash distributions on our common stock, if declared) and near-term debt maturities with our cash on hand.
Debt. As of March 31, 2017, we had $1.0 billion of consolidated debt, $506.2 million of cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, and total assets of $3.7 billion. We believe that by controlling debt levels, staggering maturity dates and maintaining a highly flexible capital structure, we can maintain lower capital costs than more highly leveraged companies, or companies with limited flexibility due to restrictive corporate-level financial covenants.
The weighted average term to maturity of our debt as of March 31, 2017 is approximately 6 years, and 77.8% of our debt, including the effects of interest rate swap agreements, is fixed rate with a weighted average interest rate of 4.6%. Including our variable-rate debt obligation based on the variable rate at March 31, 2017, the weighted average interest rate on our debt is 4.2%.
As of March 31, 2017, all of our outstanding debt had fixed interest rates or had been swapped to fixed interest rates, except the $221.5 million non-recourse mortgage on the Hilton San Diego Bayfront, which is subject to an interest rate cap agreement that caps the interest rate at 4.25% until May 2017. In March 2017, we purchased a new interest rate cap agreement that will continue to cap the interest rate at 4.25% until May 2019. Our mortgage debt is in the form of single asset non-recourse loans rather than cross-collateralized multi-property pools. In addition to our mortgage debt, as of March 31, 2017, we have two unsecured corporate-level term loans as well as the Senior Notes. We currently believe this structure is appropriate for the operating characteristics of our business as it isolates risk and provides flexibility for various portfolio management initiatives, including the sale of individual hotels subject to existing debt.
Each of our 2017 year-to-date debt transactions is discussed below.
In January 2017, we received proceeds of $240.0 million in a private placement of the Senior Notes. The private placement consisted of the Series A Senior Notes, which includes $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.69%, maturing in January 2026, and the Series B Senior Notes, which includes $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.79%, maturing in January 2028.
In January 2017, we used proceeds received from the Senior Notes to repay the loan secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf, which had a balance of $176.0 million and an interest rate of 5.58%. The Marriott Boston Long Wharf loan was scheduled to mature in April 2017, and was available to be repaid without penalty in January 2017.
31
We may in the future seek to obtain mortgages on one or all of our 22 unencumbered hotels, 15 of which are currently held by subsidiaries whose interests are pledged to our credit facility. Our 22 unencumbered hotels include: Boston Park Plaza; Courtyard by Marriott Los Angeles; Embassy Suites Chicago; Hilton Garden Inn Chicago Downtown/Magnificent Mile; Hilton New Orleans St. Charles; Hilton North Houston; Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile; Hyatt Regency Newport Beach; Hyatt Regency San Francisco; Marriott Boston Long Wharf; Marriott Houston; Marriott Park City; Marriott Philadelphia; Marriott Portland; Marriott Quincy; Marriott Tysons Corner; Renaissance Harborplace; Renaissance Long Beach; Renaissance Los Angeles Airport; Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld®; Renaissance Westchester; and Wailea Beach Resort. Should we obtain secured financing on any or all of our unencumbered hotels, the amount of capital available through our credit facility may be reduced.
Contractual Obligations. The following table summarizes our payment obligations and commitments as of March 31, 2017 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Payment due by period |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
More than |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
1 year |
|
years |
|
years |
|
5 years |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes payable |
|
$ |
997,346 |
|
$ |
10,167 |
|
$ |
234,213 |
|
$ |
194,192 |
|
$ |
558,774 |
|
||||||||||||||
Interest obligations on notes payable (1) |
|
|
258,488 |
|
|
41,964 |
|
|
80,694 |
|
|
58,001 |
|
|
77,829 |
|
||||||||||||||
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
15,575 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
15,569 |
|
||||||||||||||
Interest obligations on capital leases |
|
|
97,697 |
|
|
1,402 |
|
|
2,804 |
|
|
2,803 |
|
|
90,688 |
|
||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
357,508 |
|
|
10,196 |
|
|
20,112 |
|
|
20,059 |
|
|
307,141 |
|
||||||||||||||
Construction commitments |
|
|
46,139 |
|
|
46,139 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||
Employment obligations |
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
||||||||||||||
Total |
|
$ |
1,775,477 |
|
$ |
112,593 |
|
$ |
337,825 |
|
$ |
275,058 |
|
$ |
1,050,001 |
|
(1) |
Interest on our variable rate debt obligation is calculated based on the variable rate at March 31, 2017, and includes the effect of our interest rate derivative agreements. |
Capital Expenditures and Reserve Funds
We believe we maintain each of our hotels in good repair and condition and in general conformity with applicable franchise and management agreements, ground, building and air leases, laws and regulations. Our capital expenditures primarily relate to the ongoing maintenance of our hotels and are budgeted in the reserve accounts described in the following paragraph. We also incur capital expenditures for cyclical renovations, hotel repositionings and development. We invested $29.9 million in our portfolio during the first quarter of 2017. As of March 31, 2017, we have contractual construction commitments totaling $46.1 million. If we renovate or develop additional hotels in the future, our capital expenditures will likely increase.
With respect to our hotels that are operated under management or franchise agreements with major national hotel brands and for all of our hotels subject to first mortgage liens, we are obligated to maintain an FF&E reserve account for future planned and emergency-related capital expenditures at these hotels. The amount funded into each of these reserve accounts is determined pursuant to the management, franchise and loan agreements for each of the respective hotels, ranging between zero and 5.0% of the respective hotel’s total annual revenue. As of March 31, 2017, our balance sheet includes restricted cash of $62.7 million, which was held in FF&E reserve accounts for future capital expenditures at the majority of our 27 hotels. According to certain loan agreements, reserve funds are to be held by the lenders or managers in restricted cash accounts, and we are not required to spend the entire amount in such reserve accounts each year.
Seasonality and Volatility
As is typical of the lodging industry, we experience some seasonality in our business as indicated in the table below. Revenue for certain of our hotels is generally affected by seasonal business patterns (e.g., the first quarter is strong in Orlando, the second quarter is strong for the Mid-Atlantic business hotels, and the fourth quarter is strong for New York City and Hawaii). Quarterly revenue also may be adversely affected by renovations and repositionings, our managers’ effectiveness in generating business and by events beyond our control, such as extreme weather conditions, terrorist attacks or alerts, civil unrest, public health concerns, airline
32
strikes or reduced airline capacity, economic factors and other considerations affecting travel. Revenues for our 27 hotel Comparable Portfolio by quarter for 2016 and 2017 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Revenues |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Total |
|
||||||||||
2016: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
274,292 |
|
$ |
322,160 |
|
$ |
303,304 |
|
$ |
289,584 |
|
$ |
1,189,340 |
|
|||||
Sold hotel revenues (1) |
|
|
(11,248) |
|
|
(10,148) |
|
|
(8,373) |
|
|
(7,373) |
|
|
(37,142) |
|
|||||
Non-hotel revenues (2) |
|
|
(121) |
|
|
(99) |
|
|
210 |
|
|
(5,066) |
|
|
(5,076) |
|
|||||
Total Comparable Portfolio revenues (3) |
|
$ |
262,923 |
|
$ |
311,913 |
|
$ |
295,141 |
|
$ |
277,145 |
|
$ |
1,147,122 |
|
|||||
Quarterly Comparable Portfolio revenues as a percentage of total annual revenues |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
27.2 |
% |
|
25.7 |
% |
|
24.2 |
% |
|
100.00 |
% |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
2017: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
280,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sold hotel revenues (1) |
|
|
(3,541) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Non-hotel revenues (2) |
|
|
(18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Comparable Portfolio revenues (3) |
|
$ |
277,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Sold hotel revenues include those generated by the Fairmont Newport Beach and the Sheraton Cerritos, which we sold in February 2017 and May 2016, respectively. |
(2) |
Non-hotel revenues include the amortization of favorable and unfavorable tenant lease contracts received in conjunction with our acquisitions of the Boston Park Plaza, the Hilton Garden Inn Downtown/Magnificent Mile, the Hilton New Orleans St. Charles, the Hyatt Regency San Francisco and the Wailea Beach Resort. |
(3) |
Total Comparable Portfolio revenues include those generated by our 27 hotel Comparable Portfolio. |
Inflation
Inflation may affect our expenses, including, without limitation, by increasing such costs as labor, food, taxes, property and casualty insurance and utilities.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience, information that is currently available to us and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
· |
Impairment of long-lived assets. We periodically review each property for possible impairment. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. We perform a Level 3 analysis of fair value, using a discounted cash flow analysis to estimate the fair value of our properties taking into account each property’s expected cash flow from operations, holding period and proceeds from the disposition of the property. The factors addressed in determining estimated proceeds from disposition include anticipated operating cash flow in the year of disposition and terminal capitalization rate. Our judgment is required in determining the discount rate applied to estimated cash flows, growth rate of the properties, operating income of the properties, the need for capital expenditures, as well as specific market and economic conditions. |
· |
Acquisition related assets and liabilities. Accounting for the acquisition of a hotel property or other entity as a business combination requires an allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in the transaction at their respective estimated fair values. The most difficult estimations of individual fair values are those involving long-lived assets, such as property, equipment, intangible assets and capital lease obligations that are assumed as part of the acquisition of a leasehold interest. When we acquire a hotel property or other entity as a business combination, we use all available information to make these fair value determinations, and engage independent valuation specialists to assist in the fair value determinations of the long-lived assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Due to the |
33
inherent subjectivity in determining the estimated fair value of long-lived assets, we believe that the recording of acquired assets and liabilities is a critical accounting policy. |
· |
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation expense is based on the estimated useful life of our assets. The life of the assets is based on a number of assumptions, including the cost and timing of capital expenditures to maintain and refurbish our hotels, as well as specific market and economic conditions. Hotel properties and other investments are depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives primarily ranging from five to 35 years for buildings and improvements and three to 12 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. While we believe our estimates are reasonable, a change in the estimated lives could affect depreciation expense and net income or the gain or loss on the sale of any of our hotels. We have not changed the estimated useful lives of any of our assets during the periods discussed. |
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
To the extent that we incur debt with variable interest rates, our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. We have no derivative financial instruments held for trading purposes. We use derivative financial instruments, which are intended to manage interest rate risks.
As of March 31, 2017, 77.8% of our debt obligations are fixed in nature, which largely mitigates the effect of changes in interest rates on our cash interest payments. If the market rate of interest on our variable rate debt increases or decreases by 100 basis points, interest expense would increase or decrease, respectively, our future earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.0 million based on the variable rate at March 31, 2017. After adjusting for the noncontrolling interest in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront, this increase or decrease in interest expense would increase or decrease, respectively, our future earnings and cash flows by $1.5 million, based on the variable rates at March 31, 2017.
Item 4.Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Based upon an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. During our fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates, there has not occurred any change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
34
None.
None.
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(c)Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
Total Number |
|
Average Price |
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number |
|
||
January 1, 2017 — January 31, 2017 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2017 — February 28, 2017 |
|
249,303 |
|
$ 15.21 |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2017 — March 31, 2017 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
249,303 |
|
$ 15.21 |
|
— |
|
|
$ 300,000,000 |
(2) |
(1) |
Reflects shares of restricted common stock withheld and used for purposes of remitting the statutory minimum federal and state tax obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted common shares issued to employees. The average price paid reflects the average market value of shares withheld for tax purposes. |
(2) |
On February 17, 2017, the Company’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase plan to acquire up to $300.0 million of the Company’s common and preferred stock. As of March 31, 2017, no shares of either the Company’s common or preferred stock have been repurchased. Future purchases will depend on various factors, including the Company’s capital needs, as well as the Company’s common and preferred stock price. |
Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
None.
35
The following Exhibits are filed as a part of this report:
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
3.1 |
|
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registration statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-117141) filed by the Company). |
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q, filed by the Company on August 5, 2008). |
|
|
|
|
3.2.1 |
|
|
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., effective as of March 19, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on March 22, 2012). |
|
|
|
|
3.2.2 |
|
|
Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., effective as of February 13, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Form 10-K, filed by the Company on February 19, 2015). |
|
|
|
|
3.2.3 |
|
|
Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., effective as of February 17, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on February 21, 2017). |
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
Articles Supplementary Prohibiting the Company From Electing to be Subject to Section 3-803 of the Maryland General Corporation Law Absent Shareholder Approval (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on April 29, 2013). |
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
Articles Supplementary for Series E preferred stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the registration statement on Form 8-A, filed by the Company on March 10, 2016). |
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
Articles Supplementary for Series F preferred stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the registration statement on Form 8-A, filed by the Company on May 16, 2016). |
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Fifth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Sunstone Hotel Partnership, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on May 17, 2016). |
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 27, 2017, by and among Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., Sunstone Hotel Partnership, LLC and Marc A. Hoffman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on January 27, 2017). |
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of January 27, 2017, by and among Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., Sunstone Hotel Partnership, LLC and John V. Arabia (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on January 27, 2017). |
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2017, by and between Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. and Robert Springer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on January 27, 2017). |
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2017, by and between Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. and Bryan A. Giglia (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, filed by the Company on January 27, 2017). |
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
101.INS |
|
|
XBRL Instance Document * |
|
|
|
|
101.SCH |
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document * |
|
|
|
|
101.CAL |
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document * |
|
|
|
|
101.LAB |
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document * |
|
|
|
|
101.PRE |
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document * |
|
|
|
|
101.DEF |
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document * |
* |
|
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are the following materials, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016; (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2017; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016; and (v) Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements that have been detail tagged. |
36
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Date: May 4, 2017 |
By: |
/s/ Bryan A. Giglia |
|
|
Bryan A. Giglia |
37
Exhibit 31.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, John V. Arabia, certify that:
1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.;
2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 4, 2017 |
/s/ John V. Arabia |
|
John V. Arabia |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 31.2
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, Bryan A. Giglia, certify that:
1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.;
2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 4, 2017 |
/s/ Bryan A. Giglia |
|
Bryan A. Giglia |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:
(a) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(b) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: May 4, 2017 |
/s/ John V. Arabia |
|
John V. Arabia |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Date: May 4, 2017 |
/s/ Bryan A. Giglia |
|
Bryan A. Giglia |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Document and Entity Information - shares |
3 Months Ended | |
---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 |
May 01, 2017 |
|
Document and Entity Information | ||
Entity Registrant Name | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. | |
Entity Central Index Key | 0001295810 | |
Document Type | 10-Q | |
Document Period End Date | Mar. 31, 2017 | |
Amendment Flag | false | |
Current Fiscal Year End Date | --12-31 | |
Entity Current Reporting Status | Yes | |
Entity Filer Category | Large Accelerated Filer | |
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | 220,463,909 | |
Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2017 | |
Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q1 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY - 3 months ended Mar. 31, 2017 - USD ($) |
Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock
|
Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
Cumulative dividends and distributions
|
Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock |
Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
Preferred Stock
|
Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
Cumulative dividends and distributions
|
Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock |
Common Stock |
Additional Paid In Capital |
Retained Earnings |
Cumulative dividends and distributions |
Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Joint Venture |
Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beginning Balance at Dec. 31, 2016 | $ 115,000,000 | $ 75,000,000 | $ 2,201,000 | $ 2,596,620,000 | $ 786,901,000 | $ (1,092,952,000) | $ 49,062,000 | $ 2,531,832,000 | ||||
Beginning Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2016 | 4,600,000 | 3,000,000 | 220,073,140 | |||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||||||
Deferred stock compensation, net | $ 3,000 | (1,896,000) | (1,893,000) | |||||||||
Deferred stock compensation, net (in shares) | 344,277 | |||||||||||
Common stock distributions and distributions payable | (11,021,000) | (11,021,000) | ||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends and dividends payable | $ (1,998,000) | $ (1,998,000) | $ (1,209,000) | $ (1,209,000) | ||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interest | (2,325,000) | (2,325,000) | ||||||||||
Net income | 61,835,000 | 1,992,000 | 63,827,000 | |||||||||
Ending Balance at Mar. 31, 2017 | $ 115,000,000 | $ 75,000,000 | $ 2,204,000 | $ 2,594,724,000 | $ 848,736,000 | $ (1,107,180,000) | $ 48,729,000 | $ 2,577,213,000 | ||||
Ending Balance (in shares) at Mar. 31, 2017 | 4,600,000 | 3,000,000 | 220,417,417 |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY (Parenthetical) |
3 Months Ended |
---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017
$ / shares
| |
Common stock distributions and distributions payable, per share (in dollars per share) | $ 0.05 |
Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock | |
Preferred stock dividends declared (in dollars per share) | 0.434375 |
Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock | |
Preferred stock dividends declared (in dollars per share) | $ 0.403125 |
Organization and Description of Business |
3 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Organization and Description of Business | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Organization and Description of Business | 1. Organization and Description of Business
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Maryland on June 28, 2004 in anticipation of an initial public offering of common stock, which was consummated on October 26, 2004. The Company, through its 100% controlling interest in Sunstone Hotel Partnership, LLC (the “Operating Partnership”), of which the Company is the sole managing member, and the subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership, including Sunstone Hotel TRS Lessee, Inc. (the “TRS Lessee”) and its subsidiaries, is currently engaged in acquiring, owning, asset managing and renovating hotel properties. The Company may also sell certain hotel properties from time to time. The Company operates as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes.
As a REIT, certain tax laws limit the amount of “non-qualifying” income the Company can earn, including income derived directly from the operation of hotels. The Company leases all of its hotels to its TRS Lessee, which in turn enters into long-term management agreements with third parties to manage the operations of the Company’s hotels, in transactions that are intended to generate qualifying income. As of March 31, 2017, the Company had interests in 27 hotels (the “27 hotels”), and the Company’s third-party managers included the following:
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
3 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, the TRS Lessee and their subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. If the Company determines that it has an interest in a variable interest entity within the meaning of the Consolidation Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), the Company will consolidate the entity when it is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the entity. Based on its review, the Company determined that all of its subsidiaries were properly consolidated as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
Noncontrolling interest at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 represents the outside 25.0% equity interest in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront, which the Company includes in its financial statements on a consolidated basis.
The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the Company’s opinion, the interim financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments, consisting solely of normal and recurring adjustments, which are necessary to fairly present the interim financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23, 2017.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of these financial statements.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Earnings Per Share
The Company applies the two-class method when computing its earnings per share. As required by the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC, the net income per share for each class of stock (common stock and convertible preferred stock) is calculated assuming all of the Company’s net income is distributed as dividends to each class of stock based on their contractual rights. To the extent the Company has undistributed earnings in any calendar quarter, the Company will follow the two-class method of computing earnings per share.
The Company follows the requirements of the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are considered participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.
In accordance with the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC, basic earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period, plus potential common shares considered outstanding during the period, as long as the inclusion of such awards is not anti-dilutive. Potential common shares consist of unvested restricted stock awards and the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, using the more dilutive of either the two-class method or the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (in thousands, except per share data):
The Company’s unvested restricted shares associated with its long-term incentive plan and shares associated with common stock options have been excluded from the above calculation of earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
New Accounting Standards and Accounting Changes
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU No. 2014-09”). The core principle of ASU No. 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity will need to apply a five-step model: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU No. 2014-09 was originally to be effective during the first quarter of 2017; however, the FASB issued a one-year deferral so that it now becomes effective during the first quarter of 2018. ASU No. 2014-09 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.
In March 2016, the FASB clarified the principal versus agent guidance in ASU No. 2014-09 with its issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)” (“ASU No. 2016-08”). In particular, ASU No. 2016-08 clarifies how an entity should identify the unit of accounting for the principal versus agent evaluation and how it should apply the control principle to certain types of arrangements, such as service transactions by explaining what a principal controls before the specified good or service is transferred to the customer. In addition, ASU No. 2016-08 reframes the indicators to focus on evidence that an entity is acting as a principal rather than as an agent. ASU No. 2016-08 will become effective, along with ASU No. 2014-09, during the first quarter of 2018. Similar to ASU No. 2014-09, ASU No. 2016-08 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.
In May 2016, the FASB amended ASU No. 2014-09’s guidance on transition, collectability, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes with its issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients” (“ASU No. 2016-12”). The amendments clarify that, for a contract to be considered completed at transition, all (or substantially all) of the revenue must have been recognized under legacy GAAP. This clarification is important because entities that use the modified retrospective transition approach need to apply the standard only to contracts that are not complete as of the date of initial application, and entities that use the full retrospective approach may apply certain practical expedients to completed contracts. In addition, ASU No. 2016-12 clarifies that an entity should consider the probability of collecting substantially all of the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for goods and services expected to be transferred to the customer rather than the total amount promised for all the goods or services in the contract. ASU No. 2016-12 also clarifies that an entity may consider its ability to manage its exposure to credit risk as part of the collectability assessment, as well as that the fair value of noncash consideration should be measured at contract inception when determining the transaction price. Finally, ASU No. 2016-12 allows an entity to make an accounting policy election to exclude from the transaction price certain types of taxes collected from a customer if it discloses that policy. ASU No. 2016-12 will become effective, along with ASU No. 2014-09, during the first quarter of 2018. Similar to ASU No. 2014-09, ASU No. 2016-12 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.
The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2014-09, along with the related clarifications and amendments in ASU No. 2016-08 and ASU No. 2016-12, will have on its recognition of revenue included in its consolidated financial statements. While the Company is still evaluating the impact that the ASUs will have on accounting for the gain recognized upon the sale of a hotel, there is a possibility that the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 will affect the timing of any gain recognition in the consolidated financial statements. For example, under current guidance, a gain on the sale of hotel properties with contingencies and some future involvement is deferred until all contingencies have been removed. Under the new guidance, however, the entire gain on sale may be recognized upon the close of escrow. The Company expects to adopt the new ASUs under the modified retrospective approach.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU No. 2016-02”), which will require lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses in the income statement in a manner similar to today’s accounting. The guidance also eliminates today’s real estate-specific provisions and changes the guidance on sale-leaseback transactions, initial direct costs and lease executory costs for all entities. For lessors, the standard modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. All entities will classify leases to determine how to recognize lease-related revenue and expense. Classification will continue to affect amounts that lessors record on the balance sheet. ASU No. 2016-02 will become effective during the first quarter of 2019, and will require a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements, and, other than the inclusion of operating leases on the Company’s balance sheet, such effects have not yet been determined.
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU No. 2016-13”), which will replace today’s “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized cost. For trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and other instruments, entities will be required to use a new forward looking “expected loss” model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for losses. In addition, entities will have to disclose significantly more information, including information they use to track credit quality by year of origination for most financing receivables. ASU No. 2016-13 will become effective during the first quarter of 2020. ASU No. 2016-13 will require a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted during the first quarter of 2019. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2016-13 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU No. 2016-15”), which clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-15 addresses certain issues where diversity in practice was identified. It amends existing guidance, which is principles based and often requires judgment to determine the appropriate classification of cash flows as operating, investing or financing activities. In addition, ASU No. 2016-15 clarifies how the predominance principle should be applied when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-15 will become effective during the first quarter of 2018, and will generally require a retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2016-15 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU No. 2016-18”), which will require entities to show the changes in total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. When cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are presented in more than one line item on the balance sheet, the new guidance requires a reconciliation of the totals in the statement of cash flows to the related caption in the balance sheet. This reconciliation can be presented either on the face of the statement of cash flows or in the notes to the financial statements. ASU No. 2016-18 will become effective in the first quarter of 2018, and will require a retrospective approach. Early adoption in an interim period is permitted, but any adjustments must be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes the interim period. Upon adoption of this standard, amounts included in restricted cash on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets will be included with cash and cash equivalents on its consolidated statements of cash flows. These amounts totaled $64.4 million and $67.9 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The adoption of this standard will not change the Company’s balance sheet presentation.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU No. 2017-01”), which changes the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. Under the new guidance, an entity first determines whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. If this threshold is met, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. If it is not met, the entity then evaluates whether the set meets the requirement that a business include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. ASU No. 2017-01 will become effective in the first quarter of 2018, and the guidance is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. Once adopted, the Company will be required to analyze future hotel acquisitions to determine if the transaction qualifies as the purchase of a business or an asset. Transaction costs associated with asset acquisitions will be capitalized, while the same costs associated with a business combination will continue to be expensed as incurred. In addition, asset acquisitions will not be subject to a measurement period, as are business combinations. Depending on the Company’s conclusion, ASU No. 2017-01 may have an effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU No. 2017-04”), which eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill (i.e., Step 2 of today’s goodwill impairment test) to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Under the new guidance, if a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard does not change the guidance on completing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. An entity will still be able to perform today’s optional qualitative goodwill impairment assessment before determining whether to proceed to Step 1. ASU No. 2017-04 will become effective in the first quarter of 2019, and the guidance is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2017-04 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Noncontrolling Interest
The Company’s consolidated financial statements include an entity in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Noncontrolling interest is the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. Such noncontrolling interest is reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity. On the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from the less-than-wholly-owned subsidiary is reported at the consolidated amount, including both the amounts attributable to the Company and the noncontrolling interest. Income or loss is allocated to the noncontrolling interest based on its weighted average ownership percentage for the applicable period. The consolidated statement of equity includes beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for each component of stockholders’ equity, noncontrolling interest and total equity.
At both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the noncontrolling interest reported in the Company’s financial statements included the 25.0% outside ownership in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront.
Segment Reporting
The Company considers each of its hotels to be an operating segment, none of which meets the threshold for a separate reportable segment in accordance with the Segment Reporting Topic of the FASB ASC. Currently, the Company operates in one segment, hotel ownership. |
Investment in Hotel Properties |
3 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in Hotel Properties | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in Hotel Properties | 3. Investment in Hotel Properties
Investment in hotel properties, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
Disposals |
3 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disposals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disposals | 4. Disposals
In February 2017, the Company sold the 444-room Fairmont Newport Beach located in Newport Beach, California for net proceeds of $122.8 million. The Company recognized a net gain on the sale of $44.3 million. The sale did not represent a strategic shift that had a major impact on the Company’s business plan or its primary markets, and therefore, the sale of the hotel did not qualify as a discontinued operation. The Company classified the assets and liabilities of the Fairmont Newport Beach as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 as follows (in thousands):
The following table provides summary results of operations for the Fairmont Newport Beach, as well as the Sheraton Cerritos that was sold during 2016, both of which are included in continuing operations (in thousands):
|
Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives |
3 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives | 5. Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the carrying amount of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses were representative of their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.
The Company follows the requirements of the Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Topic of the FASB ASC, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value and disclosing fair value measurements by establishing a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the only financial instruments that the Company measures at fair value are its interest rate derivatives, along with a life insurance policy and a related retirement benefit agreement. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company estimates the fair value of its interest rate derivatives using Level 2 measurements based on quotes obtained from the counterparties, which are based upon the consideration that would be required to terminate the agreements. Both the life insurance policy and the related retirement benefit agreement, which are for a former Company associate, are valued using Level 2 measurements.
The following table presents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
The following table presents the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
Interest Rate Derivatives
The Company’s interest rate derivatives, which are not designated as effective cash flow hedges, consisted of the following at March 31, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
Noncash changes in the fair values of the Company’s interest rate derivatives resulted in (decreases) increases to interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 as follows (in thousands):
Fair Value of Debt
As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, 77.8% and 76.2%, respectively, of the Company’s outstanding debt had fixed interest rates, including the effects of interest rate swap agreements. The Company’s principal value of its consolidated debt totaled $1.0 billion and $0.9 billion as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Using Level 3 measurements, the Company estimates that the fair market value of its debt totaled $1.0 billion and $0.9 billion as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. |
Other Assets |
3 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Assets | 6. Other Assets
Other assets, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
The property and equipment, net noted above consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
Notes Payable |
3 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes Payable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes Payable | 7. Notes Payable
Notes payable consisted of the following (in thousands):
Notes Payable Transactions - 2017
In January 2017, the Company received proceeds of $240.0 million in a private placement of senior unsecured notes. The private placement consisted of $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.69%, maturing in January 2026 (the “Series A Senior Notes”), and $120.0 million of notes bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.79%, maturing in January 2028 (the “Series B Senior Notes”, together the “Senior Notes”).
In January 2017, the Company used proceeds received from the Senior Notes to repay the loan secured by the Marriott Boston Long Wharf, which had a balance of $176.0 million and an interest rate of 5.58%. The Marriott Boston Long Wharf loan was scheduled to mature in April 2017, and was available to be repaid without penalty in January 2017.
Interest Expense
Total interest incurred and expensed on the notes payable was as follows (in thousands):
|
Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities |
3 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities | 8. Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities
Other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
Other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
Stockholders' Equity |
3 Months Ended |
---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | |
Stockholders' Equity | |
Stockholders' Equity | 9. Stockholders’ Equity
Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
In March 2016, the Company issued 4,600,000 shares of its 6.95% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series E preferred stock”) with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share for gross proceeds of $115.0 million. In conjunction with the offering, the Company incurred $4.0 million in preferred offering costs. On or after March 11, 2021, the Series E preferred stock will be redeemable at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends up to, but not including, the redemption date.
Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
In May 2016, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of its 6.45% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series F preferred stock) with a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share for gross proceeds of $75.0 million. In conjunction with the offering, the Company incurred $2.6 million in preferred offering costs. On or after May 17, 2021, the Series F preferred stock will be redeemable at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends up to, but not including, the redemption date.
Common Stock
In February 2017, the Company entered into separate “At the Market” Agreements (the “ATM Agreements”) with each of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. In accordance with the terms of the ATM Agreements, the Company may from time to time offer and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $300.0 million. The Company did not issue any shares of its common stock in connection with the ATM Agreements during the three months ended March 31, 2017. As of March 31, 2017, the Company has $300.0 million available for sale under the ATM Agreements.
In February 2017, the Company’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase plan to acquire up to $300.0 million of the Company’s common and preferred stock. As of March 31, 2017, no shares of either the Company’s common or preferred stock have been repurchased. Future purchases will depend on various factors, including the Company’s capital needs, as well as the Company’s common and preferred stock price.
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan |
3 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Incentive Plan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Incentive Plan | 10. Long-Term Incentive Plan
Stock Grants
Restricted shares granted pursuant to the Company’s 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 1, 2014, generally vest over periods from three to five years from the date of grant.
Compensation expense related to awards of restricted shares are measured at fair value on the date of grant and amortized over the relevant requisite service period or derived service period.
In accordance with the Compensation Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. The Company’s amortization expense and forfeitures related to restricted shares for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands):
In addition, the Company capitalizes compensation costs related to all restricted shares granted to certain employees who work on the design and construction of its hotels. During both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, these capitalized costs totaled $0.2 million.
Stock Options
In April 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s board of directors approved a grant of 200,000 non-qualified stock options (the “Options”) to one of the Company’s former associates. The Options fully vested in April 2009, and will expire in April 2018. The exercise price of the Options is $17.71 per share. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
3 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commitments and Contingencies | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commitments and Contingencies | 11. Commitments and Contingencies
Management Agreements
Management agreements with the Company’s third-party hotel managers require the Company to pay between 1.75% and 3.5% of total revenue of the managed hotels to the third-party managers each month as a basic management fee. In addition to basic management fees, provided that certain operating thresholds are met, the Company may also be required to pay incentive management fees to certain of its third-party managers. Total basic management fees, net of key money incentives received from third-party hotel managers, along with incentive management fees incurred by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were included in other property-level expenses on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):
License and Franchise Agreements
The Company has entered into license and franchise agreements related to certain of its hotel properties. The license and franchise agreements require the Company to, among other things, pay monthly fees that are calculated based on specified percentages of certain revenues. The license and franchise agreements generally contain specific standards for, and restrictions and limitations on, the operation and maintenance of the hotels which are established by the franchisors to maintain uniformity in the system created by each such franchisor. Such standards generally regulate the appearance of the hotel, quality and type of goods and services offered, signage and protection of trademarks. Compliance with such standards may from time to time require the Company to make significant expenditures for capital improvements.
Total license and franchise fees incurred by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were included in franchise costs on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):
Renovation and Construction Commitments
At March 31, 2017, the Company had various contracts outstanding with third parties in connection with the renovation and repositioning of certain of its hotel properties. The remaining commitments under these contracts at March 31, 2017 totaled $46.1 million.
Capital Leases
The Hyatt Centric Chicago Magnificent Mile is subject to a building lease which expires in December 2097. Upon acquisition of the hotel in June 2012, the Company evaluated the terms of the lease agreement and determined the lease to be a capital lease pursuant to the Leases Topic of the FASB ASC.
The capital lease asset was included in investment in hotel properties, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as follows (in thousands):
Future minimum lease payments under the Company’s capital lease together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of March 31, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):
Ground, Building and Air Leases
Total rent expense incurred pursuant to ground, building and air lease agreements for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was included in property tax, ground lease and insurance on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):
Rent expense incurred pursuant to a lease on the corporate facility totaled $0.1 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, and is included in corporate overhead expense.
Concentration of Risk
The concentration of the Company’s hotels in California, Illinois, Massachusetts and the greater Washington DC area exposes the Company’s business to economic conditions, competition and real and personal property tax rates unique to these locales. As of March 31, 2017, 16 of the Company’s 27 hotels were concentrated in California, Illinois, Massachusetts and the greater Washington DC area as follows:
Other
The Company has provided customary unsecured environmental indemnities to certain lenders. The Company has performed due diligence on the potential environmental risks, including obtaining an independent environmental review from outside environmental consultants. These indemnities obligate the Company to reimburse the indemnified parties for damages related to certain environmental matters. There is no term or damage limitation on these indemnities; however, if an environmental matter arises, the Company could have recourse against other previous owners or a claim against its environmental insurance policies.
At March 31, 2017, the Company had $0.5 million of outstanding irrevocable letters of credit to guaranty the Company’s financial obligations related to workers’ compensation insurance programs from prior policy years. The beneficiaries of these letters of credit may draw upon these letters of credit in the event of a contractual default by the Company relating to each respective obligation. No draws have been made through March 31, 2017.
The Company is subject to various claims, lawsuits and legal proceedings, including routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, regarding the operation of its hotels and Company matters. While it is not possible to ascertain the ultimate outcome of such matters, the Company believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts covered by insurance will not have a material adverse impact on its financial condition or results of operations. The outcome of claims, lawsuits and legal proceedings brought against the Company, however, is subject to significant uncertainties. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) |
3 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basis of Presentation | Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership, the TRS Lessee and their subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. If the Company determines that it has an interest in a variable interest entity within the meaning of the Consolidation Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”), the Company will consolidate the entity when it is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the entity. Based on its review, the Company determined that all of its subsidiaries were properly consolidated as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
Noncontrolling interest at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 represents the outside 25.0% equity interest in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront, which the Company includes in its financial statements on a consolidated basis.
The accompanying interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the Company’s opinion, the interim financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments, consisting solely of normal and recurring adjustments, which are necessary to fairly present the interim financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23, 2017.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of these financial statements.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings Per Share | Earnings Per Share
The Company applies the two-class method when computing its earnings per share. As required by the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC, the net income per share for each class of stock (common stock and convertible preferred stock) is calculated assuming all of the Company’s net income is distributed as dividends to each class of stock based on their contractual rights. To the extent the Company has undistributed earnings in any calendar quarter, the Company will follow the two-class method of computing earnings per share.
The Company follows the requirements of the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are considered participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.
In accordance with the Earnings Per Share Topic of the FASB ASC, basic earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period, plus potential common shares considered outstanding during the period, as long as the inclusion of such awards is not anti-dilutive. Potential common shares consist of unvested restricted stock awards and the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, using the more dilutive of either the two-class method or the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (in thousands, except per share data):
The Company’s unvested restricted shares associated with its long-term incentive plan and shares associated with common stock options have been excluded from the above calculation of earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Accounting Standards and Accounting Changes | New Accounting Standards and Accounting Changes
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU No. 2014-09”). The core principle of ASU No. 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity will need to apply a five-step model: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU No. 2014-09 was originally to be effective during the first quarter of 2017; however, the FASB issued a one-year deferral so that it now becomes effective during the first quarter of 2018. ASU No. 2014-09 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.
In March 2016, the FASB clarified the principal versus agent guidance in ASU No. 2014-09 with its issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)” (“ASU No. 2016-08”). In particular, ASU No. 2016-08 clarifies how an entity should identify the unit of accounting for the principal versus agent evaluation and how it should apply the control principle to certain types of arrangements, such as service transactions by explaining what a principal controls before the specified good or service is transferred to the customer. In addition, ASU No. 2016-08 reframes the indicators to focus on evidence that an entity is acting as a principal rather than as an agent. ASU No. 2016-08 will become effective, along with ASU No. 2014-09, during the first quarter of 2018. Similar to ASU No. 2014-09, ASU No. 2016-08 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.
In May 2016, the FASB amended ASU No. 2014-09’s guidance on transition, collectability, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes with its issuance of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients” (“ASU No. 2016-12”). The amendments clarify that, for a contract to be considered completed at transition, all (or substantially all) of the revenue must have been recognized under legacy GAAP. This clarification is important because entities that use the modified retrospective transition approach need to apply the standard only to contracts that are not complete as of the date of initial application, and entities that use the full retrospective approach may apply certain practical expedients to completed contracts. In addition, ASU No. 2016-12 clarifies that an entity should consider the probability of collecting substantially all of the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for goods and services expected to be transferred to the customer rather than the total amount promised for all the goods or services in the contract. ASU No. 2016-12 also clarifies that an entity may consider its ability to manage its exposure to credit risk as part of the collectability assessment, as well as that the fair value of noncash consideration should be measured at contract inception when determining the transaction price. Finally, ASU No. 2016-12 allows an entity to make an accounting policy election to exclude from the transaction price certain types of taxes collected from a customer if it discloses that policy. ASU No. 2016-12 will become effective, along with ASU No. 2014-09, during the first quarter of 2018. Similar to ASU No. 2014-09, ASU No. 2016-12 will require either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted as of the original effective date.
The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2014-09, along with the related clarifications and amendments in ASU No. 2016-08 and ASU No. 2016-12, will have on its recognition of revenue included in its consolidated financial statements. While the Company is still evaluating the impact that the ASUs will have on accounting for the gain recognized upon the sale of a hotel, there is a possibility that the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 will affect the timing of any gain recognition in the consolidated financial statements. For example, under current guidance, a gain on the sale of hotel properties with contingencies and some future involvement is deferred until all contingencies have been removed. Under the new guidance, however, the entire gain on sale may be recognized upon the close of escrow. The Company expects to adopt the new ASUs under the modified retrospective approach.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU No. 2016-02”), which will require lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses in the income statement in a manner similar to today’s accounting. The guidance also eliminates today’s real estate-specific provisions and changes the guidance on sale-leaseback transactions, initial direct costs and lease executory costs for all entities. For lessors, the standard modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. All entities will classify leases to determine how to recognize lease-related revenue and expense. Classification will continue to affect amounts that lessors record on the balance sheet. ASU No. 2016-02 will become effective during the first quarter of 2019, and will require a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU No. 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements, and, other than the inclusion of operating leases on the Company’s balance sheet, such effects have not yet been determined.
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU No. 2016-13”), which will replace today’s “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized cost. For trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities, loans and other instruments, entities will be required to use a new forward looking “expected loss” model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for losses. In addition, entities will have to disclose significantly more information, including information they use to track credit quality by year of origination for most financing receivables. ASU No. 2016-13 will become effective during the first quarter of 2020. ASU No. 2016-13 will require a modified retrospective approach, with early adoption permitted during the first quarter of 2019. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2016-13 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU No. 2016-15”), which clarifies how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-15 addresses certain issues where diversity in practice was identified. It amends existing guidance, which is principles based and often requires judgment to determine the appropriate classification of cash flows as operating, investing or financing activities. In addition, ASU No. 2016-15 clarifies how the predominance principle should be applied when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-15 will become effective during the first quarter of 2018, and will generally require a retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2016-15 will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU No. 2016-18”), which will require entities to show the changes in total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. When cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are presented in more than one line item on the balance sheet, the new guidance requires a reconciliation of the totals in the statement of cash flows to the related caption in the balance sheet. This reconciliation can be presented either on the face of the statement of cash flows or in the notes to the financial statements. ASU No. 2016-18 will become effective in the first quarter of 2018, and will require a retrospective approach. Early adoption in an interim period is permitted, but any adjustments must be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes the interim period. Upon adoption of this standard, amounts included in restricted cash on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets will be included with cash and cash equivalents on its consolidated statements of cash flows. These amounts totaled $64.4 million and $67.9 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The adoption of this standard will not change the Company’s balance sheet presentation.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU No. 2017-01”), which changes the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. Under the new guidance, an entity first determines whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. If this threshold is met, the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. If it is not met, the entity then evaluates whether the set meets the requirement that a business include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. ASU No. 2017-01 will become effective in the first quarter of 2018, and the guidance is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. Once adopted, the Company will be required to analyze future hotel acquisitions to determine if the transaction qualifies as the purchase of a business or an asset. Transaction costs associated with asset acquisitions will be capitalized, while the same costs associated with a business combination will continue to be expensed as incurred. In addition, asset acquisitions will not be subject to a measurement period, as are business combinations. Depending on the Company’s conclusion, ASU No. 2017-01 may have an effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU No. 2017-04”), which eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill (i.e., Step 2 of today’s goodwill impairment test) to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Under the new guidance, if a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard does not change the guidance on completing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. An entity will still be able to perform today’s optional qualitative goodwill impairment assessment before determining whether to proceed to Step 1. ASU No. 2017-04 will become effective in the first quarter of 2019, and the guidance is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of ASU No. 2017-04 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling Interest | Noncontrolling Interest
The Company’s consolidated financial statements include an entity in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Noncontrolling interest is the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. Such noncontrolling interest is reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity. On the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from the less-than-wholly-owned subsidiary is reported at the consolidated amount, including both the amounts attributable to the Company and the noncontrolling interest. Income or loss is allocated to the noncontrolling interest based on its weighted average ownership percentage for the applicable period. The consolidated statement of equity includes beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for each component of stockholders’ equity, noncontrolling interest and total equity.
At both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the noncontrolling interest reported in the Company’s financial statements included the 25.0% outside ownership in the Hilton San Diego Bayfront. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment Reporting | Segment Reporting
The Company considers each of its hotels to be an operating segment, none of which meets the threshold for a separate reportable segment in accordance with the Segment Reporting Topic of the FASB ASC. Currently, the Company operates in one segment, hotel ownership. |
Organization and Description of Business (Tables) |
3 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Organization and Description of Business | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of number of hotels managed by each third-party manager |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables) |
3 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share | The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (in thousands, except per share data):
|
Investment in Hotel Properties (Tables) |
3 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in Hotel Properties | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of investment in hotel properties | Investment in hotel properties, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
Disposals (Tables) |
3 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disposals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of amounts held for sale | The Company classified the assets and liabilities of the Fairmont Newport Beach as held for sale as of December 31, 2016 as follows (in thousands):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of operating results for sold entities | The following table provides summary results of operations for the Fairmont Newport Beach, as well as the Sheraton Cerritos that was sold during 2016, both of which are included in continuing operations (in thousands):
|
Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives (Tables) |
3 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of assets measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis | The following table presents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis | The following table presents the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of interest rate derivatives | The Company’s interest rate derivatives, which are not designated as effective cash flow hedges, consisted of the following at March 31, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of changes in fair value of interest rate derivatives | Noncash changes in the fair values of the Company’s interest rate derivatives resulted in (decreases) increases to interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 as follows (in thousands):
|
Other Assets (Tables) |
3 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of other assets | Other assets, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of property and equipment | The property and equipment, net noted above consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
Notes Payable (Tables) |
3 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes Payable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of notes payable | Notes payable consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of interest incurred and expensed | Total interest incurred and expensed on the notes payable was as follows (in thousands):
|
Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities (Tables) |
3 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of other current liabilities | Other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of other liabilities | Other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan (Tables) |
3 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Incentive Plan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of amortization expense and forfeitures related to restricted shares and performance awards | In accordance with the Compensation Topic of the FASB ASC, the Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. The Company’s amortization expense and forfeitures related to restricted shares for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (in thousands):
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Tables) |
3 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commitments and Contingencies | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of basic and incentive management fees | Total basic management fees, net of key money incentives received from third-party hotel managers, along with incentive management fees incurred by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were included in other property-level expenses on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of License and Franchise Costs | Total license and franchise fees incurred by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were included in franchise costs on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of assets under capital lease | The capital lease asset was included in investment in hotel properties, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as follows (in thousands):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of future minimum lease payments under capital lease | Future minimum lease payments under the Company’s capital lease together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of March 31, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of ground, building and air lease rent | Total rent expense incurred pursuant to ground, building and air lease agreements for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was included in property tax, ground lease and insurance on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income as follows (in thousands):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of Hotel Geographic Concentration of Risk | As of March 31, 2017, 16 of the Company’s 27 hotels were concentrated in California, Illinois, Massachusetts and the greater Washington DC area as follows:
|
Investment in Hotel Properties (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands |
Mar. 31, 2017 |
Dec. 31, 2016 |
---|---|---|
Investment in Hotel Properties | ||
Land | $ 531,660 | $ 531,660 |
Buildings and improvements | 3,174,081 | 3,135,806 |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 522,806 | 512,372 |
Intangible assets | 48,759 | 49,015 |
Franchise fees | 1,021 | 1,021 |
Construction in process | 48,856 | 65,449 |
Investment in hotel properties, gross | 4,327,183 | 4,295,323 |
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (1,177,711) | (1,137,104) |
Investment in hotel properties, net | $ 3,149,472 | $ 3,158,219 |
Fair Value Measurements and Interest Rate Derivatives - Fair Value of Debt (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands |
Mar. 31, 2017 |
Dec. 31, 2016 |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Debt Bearing Fixed Interest Rates | 77.80% | 76.20% |
Notes payable | $ 997,346 | $ 935,944 |
Level 3 | ||
Fair value of debt | $ 1,000,000 | $ 900,000 |
Other Assets (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands |
Mar. 31, 2017 |
Dec. 31, 2016 |
---|---|---|
Other assets, net | ||
Property and equipment, net | $ 699 | $ 779 |
Goodwill | 990 | 990 |
Deferred expense on straight-lined third-party tenant leases | 2,853 | 2,876 |
Interest rate derivatives | 2,425 | 1,749 |
Other receivables | 1,491 | 1,673 |
Other | 1,487 | 1,322 |
Total other assets, net | $ 9,945 | $ 9,389 |
Other Assets - Property and Equipment (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands |
Mar. 31, 2017 |
Dec. 31, 2016 |
---|---|---|
Other Assets | ||
Property and equipment, gross | $ 10,843 | $ 10,807 |
Accumulated depreciation | (10,144) | (10,028) |
Property and equipment, net | $ 699 | $ 779 |
Notes Payable - Transactions (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands |
1 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | |
---|---|---|---|
Jan. 31, 2017 |
Mar. 31, 2017 |
Mar. 31, 2016 |
|
Notes Payable Transactions | |||
Proceeds from notes payable | $ 240,000 | $ 100,000 | |
Senior Notes | |||
Notes Payable Transactions | |||
Proceeds from notes payable | $ 240,000 | ||
Series A Senior Notes | |||
Notes Payable Transactions | |||
Proceeds from notes payable | $ 120,000 | ||
Fixed interest rate (as a percent) | 4.69% | 4.69% | |
Series B Senior Notes | |||
Notes Payable Transactions | |||
Proceeds from notes payable | $ 120,000 | ||
Fixed interest rate (as a percent) | 4.79% | 4.79% | |
Marriott Boston Long Wharf mortgage payable | |||
Notes Payable Transactions | |||
Fixed interest rate (as a percent) | 5.58% | ||
Repayment of mortgage debt | $ 176,000 |
Notes Payable - Interest Expense (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands |
3 Months Ended | |
---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 |
Mar. 31, 2016 |
|
Interest incurred and expensed | ||
Interest expense on debt and capital lease obligations | $ 11,328 | $ 13,053 |
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net | (657) | 6,402 |
Amortization of deferred financing fees | 578 | 555 |
Total interest incurred and expensed on debt and capital lease obligations | $ 11,249 | $ 20,010 |
Other Current Liabilities and Other Liabilities (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands |
Mar. 31, 2017 |
Dec. 31, 2016 |
---|---|---|
Other Current Liabilities | ||
Property, sales and use taxes payable | $ 16,436 | $ 16,965 |
Income tax payable | 382 | 211 |
Accrued interest | 3,568 | 1,996 |
Advance deposits | 17,820 | 14,505 |
Management fees payable | 1,140 | 1,645 |
Other | 4,440 | 4,547 |
Total other current liabilities | 43,786 | 39,869 |
Other Liabilities | ||
Deferred gain on sale of asset | 7,000 | 7,000 |
Deferred revenue | 6,149 | 6,045 |
Deferred rent | 19,748 | 19,807 |
Deferred incentive management fees | 201 | |
Other | 3,819 | 3,798 |
Total other liabilities | $ 36,917 | $ 36,650 |
Long-Term Incentive Plan (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands |
1 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | |
---|---|---|---|
Apr. 30, 2008 |
Mar. 31, 2017 |
Mar. 31, 2016 |
|
Long-Term Incentive Plan | |||
Amortization related to shares issued to design and construction employees | $ 151 | $ 239 | |
Restricted Shares | |||
Long-Term Incentive Plan | |||
Amortization Expense, including forfeitures | 1,749 | 1,614 | |
Amortization related to shares issued to design and construction employees | $ 200 | $ 200 | |
Restricted Shares | Minimum | |||
Long-Term Incentive Plan | |||
Vesting period | 3 years | ||
Restricted Shares | Maximum | |||
Long-Term Incentive Plan | |||
Vesting period | 5 years | ||
Stock Options | Former Chairman | |||
Stock options | |||
Number of nonqualified stock options approved by the compensation committee of the Company's board of directors (in shares) | 200,000 | ||
Exercise price of outstanding options (in dollars per share) | $ 17.71 |
Commitments and Contingencies (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands |
3 Months Ended | |
---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2017 |
Mar. 31, 2016 |
|
Basic and incentive management fees incurred | ||
Basic management fees | $ 7,895 | $ 7,667 |
Incentive management fees | 2,553 | 1,704 |
Total basic and incentive management fees | 10,448 | 9,371 |
License and Franchise Agreements | ||
Franchise assessments | 5,927 | 5,813 |
Franchise royalties | 2,128 | 2,283 |
Total franchise costs | $ 8,055 | $ 8,096 |
Minimum | ||
Management Agreements | ||
Basic management fees (as a percent) | 1.75% | |
Maximum | ||
Management Agreements | ||
Basic management fees (as a percent) | 3.50% | |
Renovation and Construction Commitments | ||
Renovation and Construction Commitments | ||
Remaining construction commitments | $ 46,100 |
:TJF
MXK_"!22&!R68HS32Q964O?-&32PH1?'7<1(
MHY5("/.?3NZ#(OL 5V)A#!Q6"0)BB0!@NU*)(39K43(X@H*4+4?/HT*>>W\
MX"^\\WP_4G^%_\+'Q^$;4W7;:721Q@Z"OZZ5E 9L*M[6ICWZ/9X% 9MTWL
M7HU3.1I&]M.#0^97+_\#4$L#!!0 ( $QPI$H?+X:TQ@$ #<$ 9
M>&PO=V]R:W-H965T
&"= *<[1Y6'7F-"2*_-7:!X!%(58T?@:$YCK%F@
MRD-_^4<@50PV#8Z*"MW]$10:(S,,J6(LBSZH/-$_$0@*(UW,,*2*P4;&44EB
M+$&92R_39H$&+$(YD*HL[%8 ,7V8[[UT%O.B?_BD$HG,88TGCO%YEM\UO;[)5
M[8UXL:\J>J&H%["E_\JSJG7VL[-T<#9,VZ B(WW(MV6U*S:W\=4NV^T]]/@O
M'V-DA-?%*J_B"YCYMJP\H+[)JML\/E\L >M%@D";CT0A^#I+AJ!]]
MVBBUP AQ![:-/KU$I[K)5EW.J9U15%F=2H_<5H7.CZ-:\R24S?J(8X.Q"XH8
ML*EB6"5XFX,I:O]2D].>(M')504,FL&+%ALJ"'90QDU$=!.@ZSPVS@FP=P2O
MD-+YW&TV9M:B(\AD3;V8U'Z6,.WB/X-!3RFA\N-_[QF@2/[(,P!%_&EG8!&C
M84_KY>JG.8.KG+HUG\,OFP)$=*:QYCSJ?%V >PX@ ;<)/)#I"S\)M2P0,KQ^#
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M4CX&FW-D>Y#(*DD&9W(%FI X5X#_3>P ^K(M:_3(
M'H-Y2B/17 YCD4,\1$N%$O\BTFI+Y4 ECZ%=!,AG_#:_IVJ3+TB\R1KSB9/2
MK];:T8"EB:N3Z%P5/#91= IPH_& 0+P!BH-=!=/!!"DV$5^E&4;#V:3K'!YX
M,#B]^33EO@FR>_XBG -M)#L^H8T0L%V?%@EDSZ(X+H$P%ZG6<,H?AZQ;Q!
M<4LL#FYS6&HH,QB,Q3RTQ;B-VH(QEJC;W^+V3=T)A!RG4C7AEEF0 .A%@T&:C$%B".(/#=%LB"P#F,A,J9^QQ$7.V>CQ
M:;,&K+^)8!^IQ:SUH%D[,Z>J%6KT7D00YN"N \V:N:-:)@4X,
M<"+(
TB50=3G\ZK\Z+9
M+&DNC#ZW&T'!;3=J\Q]02P,$% @ 3'"D2E-:29JB9P SZT! !0 !X
M;"]S:&%R9613=')I;F=S+GAM;.V]:7/;6'8P_#GX%:AY[42J@M@$=W8G4R7+
M=K<2M^U8]O2;CQ )29@F"0Y 6M94?OQSMKOA7H"4;,_,DSS5U99$ G
G+=BV\W4H>>]1R;O
M0PF[M)2P"YL(_CL1P3]U*&'>U
^-Y^ASV-&S=4]N-^4?>U&P\?,X!?50DS4H/]/$IM*AVLPP[
M[WB/NILVQ=C)K]1W5#?:8W?'$\J8=WEUOZRD'_?E4=;XQ
MQ?_=4H2%:7(Z:!B.I=G%TK>F\L0F1X?*3NG.J=8C4N.U$1K0M.9(]^AP'5:"
ME/L^U_.YS]S,H.*(>JA/Z.#3018>Y1C^F3PKH8V&(% EO9E]:99SC'K'R73%-<_3,;#26C]FR,7 X(FQ3%-1Y-D.!T=96?4
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MW\2_YUA-QEKGY+W4SL%VUN79>0+<:WHO%U3B^VQ&.&;
MS95&?+:B& F=5'F,"?W1Z9M_+XQ\$3I+HL2S^9A^3D#XOFRGI\D8!"# U/XH
MLK&C$ZU8JA^-9FR>G*9=:/JF6&BZ8,+>T138@IXKZX4;)T[^>^.-F8WK=/R/
MPA0#>Y/W7TL\#2ASE#,R!EXZM)ZLRH=L11QTD*0@,0^2P6PH>-( %JE8?8KM
M@9\@83EQ,MF2VK?75&J2\]M-TL$-ZK@YU?ZGFM6K_;6]QDX7E)C,I8> +?.'
M#."N4L"%4NXSU^?6G=[R5"]