XML 31 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and include all adjustments necessary for the presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly‑owned subsidiaries. These financial statements have been prepared on a basis which assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts and disclosures reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. The Company believes judgment is involved in determining revenue recognition, valuation of financing derivative, the fair value‑based measurement of stock‑based compensation, accruals and warrant valuations. The Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions as facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions, and those differences could be material to the consolidated financial statements.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities consist of financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk in the event of a default by the related financial institution holding the securities, to the extent of the value recorded in the balance sheet. The Company invests cash that is not required for immediate operating needs primarily in highly liquid instruments with lower credit risk. The Company has established guidelines relating to the quality, diversification, and maturities of securities to enable the Company to manage its credit risk.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are carried at cost, which approximates fair value given their short‑term nature. Marketable securities, cash equivalents, and warrants for convertible preferred stock are carried at fair value.

The fair value of financial instruments reflects the amounts that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The fair value hierarchy is based on three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, of which the first two are considered observable, and the third is considered unobservable, as follows:

Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Inputs other than those included in Level 1 that are directly or indirectly observable, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company measures the fair value of financial assets and liabilities using the highest level of inputs that are reasonably available as of the measurement date. The following tables summarize the fair value of financial assets and liabilities (marketable securities and convertible preferred stock warrant liabilities) that are measured at fair value, and the classification by level of input within the fair value hierarchy:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements as of

 

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

(in thousands)

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Investments:

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Money market funds

 

$

9,663 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

9,663 

 

Federal agency securities

 

 

 —

 

 

13,770 

 

 

 —

 

 

13,770 

 

Commercial paper

 

 

 —

 

 

1,500 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,500 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

 —

 

 

14,520 

 

 

 —

 

 

14,520 

 

Total assets measured at fair value

 

$

9,663 

 

$

29,790 

 

 

 —

 

$

39,453 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing derivative

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

89 

 

 

89 

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

89 

 

$

89 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements as of

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

(in thousands)

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Investments:

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

    

 

    

 

Money market funds

 

$

53,511 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

53,511 

 

Federal agency securities

 

 

 —

 

 

12,301 

 

 

 —

 

 

12,301 

 

Commercial paper

 

 

 —

 

 

8,249 

 

 

 —

 

 

8,249 

 

Corporate debt securities

 

 

 —

 

 

1,961 

 

 

 —

 

 

1,961 

 

Total assets measured at fair value

 

$

53,511 

 

$

22,511 

 

$

 —

 

$

76,022 

 

 

The Company’s Level 2 investments include U.S. government‑backed agency securities and corporate securities that are valued based upon observable inputs that may include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two‑sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data including market research publications. The fair value of the Company’s commercial paper is based upon the time to maturity and discounted using the three‑month treasury bill rate. The average remaining maturity of the Company’s Level 2 investments as of December 31, 2014 is less than four months and all of these investments are rated A3/A-/A- or P1/A1/F1, or higher by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the periods presented.

The Company recorded a financing derivative liability resulting from an embedded derivative related to the prepayment feature the loan and security agreement with MidCap Financial. The fair value of this derivative was determined using Level 3 inputs, or significant unobservable inputs. The value of the financing derivative was determined by comparing the difference between the fair value of the notes payable with and without the financing derivative by calculating the respective present values from future cash flows using a 14% discount rate, adjusted for the probability of the occurrence of an event of default under the loan and security agreement with MidCap Financial. The 14% discount rate assumption was based on an effective borrowing rate under the current circumstances considering the quoted borrowing rate for the Company and the imputed fair value of any additional financial instruments that may be required to be extended to the lender in order to obtain such debt financing. The probability of the occurrence of an event of default under the loan and security agreement with MidCap Financial was based on management’s judgment. Refer to Note 6 for additional details regarding the loan and security agreement with MidCap Financial.

The following table presents changes in financial instruments measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements of

 

 

 

Level 3 Liabilities

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

$

157 

 

Reclassification to additional paid-in capital upon conversion to common stock warrant

 

 

(157)

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$

 —

 

Financing derivative

 

 

89 

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

$

89 

 

 

The estimated fair value of the notes payable as of December 31, 2014, based upon current market rates for similar borrowings, as measured using Level 3 inputs, approximates the carrying amount as presented on the consolidated balance sheet.

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Marketable Securities

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of 90 days or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of deposits with commercial banks in checking, interest‑bearing and demand money market accounts. The Company invests in marketable securities consisting primarily of certificates of deposit, money market funds, corporate securities, commercial paper, U.S. government‑backed securities and U.S. treasury notes. These securities are classified as available‑for‑sale and carried at estimated fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as part of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of stockholders’ equity. The Company may liquidate any of these investments in order to meet the Company’s liquidity needs in the next year.

Realized gains and losses from the sale of marketable securities are calculated using the specific‑ identification method. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other‑than‑temporary are included in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. To date, the Company has not recorded any impairment charges on its marketable securities related to other‑than‑temporary declines in market value. In determining whether a decline in market value is other‑than‑temporary, various factors are considered, including whether the decline is attributed to a change in credit risk, and whether it is more likely‑than‑not that the Company will hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in market value. The Company had no realized gains or losses from the sale of marketable securities for the year ended December 31, 2014, $2,700 realized gain for the year ended December 31, 2013, and no realized gains or losses for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 consisted of $0.2 million and $0.2 million related to standby letters of credit issued in connection with an operating lease for the Company’s corporate headquarters and certain insurance policy coverage maintained by the Company.

Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets of three years using the straight‑line method. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight‑line basis over the shorter of the useful lives or the noncancelable term of the related lease. Maintenance and repair costs are charged as expense in the statements of comprehensive loss as incurred.

Long‑Lived Assets

The Company evaluates the carrying value of its long‑lived assets, including intangible assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may be impaired. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset, including disposition, are less than the carrying value of the asset. To date, the Company has not recorded any impairment charges on its long‑lived assets.

Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liabilities and Common Stock Warrants

Prior to the Company’s IPO, outstanding warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s Series B‑2 and Series E preferred stock were classified as other liabilities. The initial liability recorded was adjusted for changes in the fair values of the Company’s preferred stock warrants during each reporting period and was recorded as a component of other income (expense) in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss for that period.

Upon the closing of the Company’s initial public offering (IPO) and the conversion of the underlying preferred stock to common stock, the Company’s warrants to purchase shares of Series B‑2 preferred stock were converted into warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The aggregate fair value of these warrants upon the closing of the IPO was $157,000 which was reclassified from liabilities to additional paid‑in capital, a component of stockholders’ equity, and the Company ceased recording any further related periodic fair value adjustments. The Company estimated the fair values of these warrants using the Black‑Scholes option‑pricing model, based on the inputs for the estimated fair value of the underlying convertible preferred stock at the valuation measurement date, the remaining contractual term of the warrant, risk‑free interest rates, expected dividend rates and expected volatility of the price of the underlying convertible preferred stock. These estimates were based on subjective assumptions.

The warrant to purchase shares of the Company’s Series E preferred stock expired upon the closing of the Company’s IPO in February 2013.

On June 19, 2013, the Company entered into an amendment (the Amendment) to a loan and security agreement (the Agreement) with MidCap Financial, SBIC, LP (MidCap Financial). In connection with the Amendment, the Company issued a warrant to purchase up to 49,548 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $12.11 per share. The warrant expires in June 2023, on the tenth anniversary of its issuance date. The warrants issued to Midcap Financial had an initial fair value of $130,000, which represent financing fees, and are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and are being amortized as non-cash interest expense over the remaining term of the Agreement using the effective interest method. The Company estimated the fair values of these warrants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, based on the inputs for the estimated fair value of the underlying common stock at the valuation measurement date, the contractual term of the warrant, risk-free interest rates, expected dividend rates and expected volatility of the price of the underlying common stock.

Research and Development Expenses

Development costs incurred in the research and development of new products are expensed as incurred, including expenses that may or may not be reimbursed under research and development collaboration arrangements. Research and development costs include, but are not limited to, salaries, benefits, stock‑based compensation, laboratory supplies, allocated overhead, fees for professional service providers and costs associated with product development efforts, including preclinical studies and clinical trials. Research and development expenses under collaborative agreements approximate or exceed the revenue recognized under such agreements.

The Company estimates preclinical study and clinical trial expenses based on the services performed, pursuant to contracts with research institutions and clinical research organizations that conduct and manage preclinical studies and clinical trials on its behalf. In accruing service fees, the Company estimates the time period over which services will be performed and the level of effort to be expended in each period. If the actual timing of the performance of services or the level of effort varies from the estimate, the Company will adjust the accrual accordingly. Payments made to third parties under these arrangements in advance of the receipt of the related services are recorded as prepaid expenses until the services are rendered.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) transfer of technology has been completed, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Payments received in advance of work performed are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized when earned. All revenue recognized to date under the Company’s collaborative agreements has been nonrefundable.

Multiple Element Arrangements

The Company evaluates revenue from agreements that have multiple elements to determine whether the components of the arrangement represent separate units of accounting. Management considers whether components of an arrangement represent separate units of accounting based upon whether certain criteria are met, including whether the delivered element has stand‑alone value to the customer. To date, all of the Company’s research and development collaboration and license agreements have been assessed to have one unit of accounting. Up‑front and license fees received for a combined unit of accounting are deferred and recognized ratably over the projected performance period. Nonrefundable fees where the Company has no continuing performance obligations are recognized as revenue when collection is reasonably assured and all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Research and Development Services

Internal and external research and development costs incurred in connection with collaboration agreements are recognized as revenue in the same period as the costs are incurred and have been presented on a gross basis because the Company acts as a principal, has the discretion to choose suppliers, bears credit risk, and performs at least part of the services.

Milestones and Other Contingent Payments

The Company has adopted the milestone method as described in FASB ASU 2010‑17, Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition. Under the milestone method, contingent consideration received from the achievement of a substantive milestone will be recognized in its entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved. A milestone is defined as an event having all of the following characteristics: (i) there is substantive uncertainty at the date the arrangement is entered into that the event will be achieved; (ii) the event can only be achieved; based in whole or in part on either the company’s performance or a specific outcome resulting from the company’s performance; and (iii) if achieved, the event would result in additional payments being due to the company. Contingent payments which do not meet the definition of a milestone are recognized in the same manner as the consideration for the combined unit of accounting. If the Company has no remaining performance obligations under combined unit if accounting, any contingent payments would be recognized as revenue upon the achievement of the triggering event.

The Company’s research and development and license agreements provide for payments to be paid to the Company upon the achievement of development milestones or success fees. Given the challenges inherent in developing biologic products, there may be substantial uncertainty as to whether any such milestones would be achieved at the time the agreements are executed. In addition, the Company will evaluate whether the development milestones meet all of the conditions to be considered substantive. The conditions include: (1) the consideration is commensurate with either of the following: (a) the vendor’s performance to achieve the milestone or (b) the enhancement of the value of the delivered item or items as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the vendor’s performance to achieve the milestone; (2) it relates solely to past performance; and (3) it is reasonable relative to all the deliverables and payment terms within the arrangement. Substantive milestones are recognized as revenue upon achievement of the milestone and when collectability is reasonably assured.

Stock‑Based Compensation Expense

The Company measures employee and director stock‑based compensation expense for stock awards at the grant date, based on the fair value‑based measurement of the award, and the expense is recorded over the related service period, generally the vesting period, net of estimated forfeitures. The Company calculates the fair value‑based measurement of stock options using the Black‑Scholes valuation model and the single‑option method and recognizes expense using the straight‑line attribution approach.

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to nonemployees based on their fair values on the measurement dates using the Black‑Scholes option‑pricing model. The fair values of the options granted to nonemployees are re‑measured as they vest. As a result, the noncash charge to operations for nonemployee options with vesting is affected each reporting period by changes in the fair value of the Company’s common stock.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under an asset‑and‑liability approach. Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between assets and liabilities recognized for tax and financial reporting purposes measured by applying enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse, net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits. Valuation allowances are provided when necessary to reduce net deferred tax assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The Company’s policy is to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the Company’s provision for income taxes.

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss represents net loss adjusted for the change during the periods presented in unrealized gains and losses on available‑for‑sale securities less reclassification adjustments for realized gains or losses included in net loss. The unrealized gains or losses are reported on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss.

Net Loss Per Common Share

Basic net loss per common share is calculated by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted‑average number of common shares outstanding during the period, without consideration for potentially dilutive securities. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted‑average number of common shares and potentially dilutive securities outstanding for the period determined using the treasury‑stock and if‑converted methods. For purposes of the diluted net loss per share calculation, convertible preferred stock, stock options and common and preferred stock warrants are considered to be potentially dilutive securities but are excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because their effect would be anti‑dilutive and therefore, basic and diluted net loss per share were the same for all periods presented.

The Company’s potential dilutive securities which include convertible preferred stock, stock options, and warrants have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as the effect would be to reduce the net loss per common share and be antidilutive. Therefore, the denominator used to calculate both basic and diluted net loss per common share is the same in all periods presented.

The following shares subject to outstanding potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the computations of diluted net loss per common share as the effect of including such securities would be antidilutive:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Convertible preferred stock

    

 —

    

 —

    

12,329,330 

 

Warrants to purchase preferred stock

 

 —

 

 —

 

72,029 

 

Options to purchase common stock

 

2,677,774 

 

1,820,784 

 

1,030,795 

 

Warrants to purchase common stock

 

88,545 

 

88,545 

 

 —

 

 

 

2,766,319 

 

1,909,329 

 

13,432,154 

 

Deferred Rent

The Company records its costs under facility operating lease agreements as rent expense. Rent expense is recognized on a straight‑line basis over the non‑cancelable term of the operating lease. The difference between the actual amounts paid and amounts recorded as rent expense is recorded to deferred rent.

Segment Reporting

The Company determines its segment reporting based upon the way the business is organized for making operating decisions and assessing performance. The Company has only one operating segment related to the development of pharmaceutical products.