EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

2795 East Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 400
Salt Lake City, Utah 84121
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý.

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $656,132,638 based upon the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2009, the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter. This calculation does not reflect a determination that persons whose shares are excluded from the computation are affiliates for any other purpose.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, $0.01 par value per share, as of February 12, 2010 was 86,723,391.

Portions of the registrant's definitive proxy statement to be issued in connection with the registrant's annual stockholders' meeting to be held in 2010 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Certain information set forth in this report contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenues or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs, plans or intentions relating to acquisitions and other information that is not historical information. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "believes," "expects," "estimates," "may," "will," "should," "anticipates," or "intends" or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. We may also make additional forward-looking statements from time to time. All such subsequent forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, by us or on our behalf, are also expressly qualified by these cautionary statements.

All forward-looking statements, including without limitation, management's examination of historical operating trends and estimates of future earnings, are based upon our current expectations and various assumptions. Our expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them, but there can be no assurance that management's expectations, beliefs and projections will result or be achieved. All forward-looking statements apply only as of the date made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in or contemplated by this report. Any forward-looking statements should be considered in light of the risks referenced in "Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors" below. Such factors include, but are not limited to:

The forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future performance, taking into account all information currently available to us. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations are subject to risks and uncertainties and can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. You should carefully consider these risks before you make an investment decision with respect to our securities.

We disclaim any duty or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to reflect new information, future events or otherwise.

Extra Space Storage Inc. ("we," "our," "us" or the "Company") is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT") formed as a Maryland corporation on April 30, 2004 to own, operate, manage, acquire, develop and redevelop professionally managed self-storage facilities. We closed our initial public offering ("IPO") on August 17, 2004. Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "EXR."

We were formed to continue the business of Extra Space Storage LLC and its subsidiaries (the "Predecessor"), which had engaged in the self-storage business since 1977. These companies were reorganized after the consummation of our IPO and various formation transactions. As of December 31, 2009, we held ownership interests in 642 operating properties. Of these 642 operating properties, 290 are wholly-owned, and 352 are owned in joint-venture partnerships. An additional 124 operating properties are owned by franchisees or third parties and operated by us in exchange for a management fee, bringing the total number of operating properties which we own and/or manage to 766. These operating properties are located in 33 states and Washington, D.C. and contain approximately 55 million square feet of net rentable space in approximately 500,000 units and currently serve a customer base of over 350,000 tenants.

We operate in three distinct segments: (1) property management, acquisition and development; (2) rental operations; and (3) tenant reinsurance. Our property management, acquisition and development activities include managing, acquiring, developing and selling self-storage facilities. On June 2, 2009, we announced the wind-down of our development activities. As of December 31, 2009, there were ten development projects remaining to be completed in our development pipeline. Our rental operations activities include the direct and indirect ownership and operation of self-storage facilities. Tenant reinsurance activities include the reinsurance of risks relating to the loss of goods stored by tenants in the Company's self storage facilities.

Substantially all of our business is conducted through Extra Space Storage LP (the "Operating Partnership"). Our primary assets are general partner and limited partner interests in the Operating Partnership. This structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT, or UPREIT. We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Internal Revenue Code"). To the extent we continue to qualify as a REIT we will not be subject to tax, with certain exceptions, on our net taxable income that is distributed to our stockholders.

We file our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). You may obtain copies of these documents by visiting the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 or by accessing the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. In addition, as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are furnished to the SEC, we make copies of these documents available to the public free of charge through our website at www.extraspace.com, or by contacting our Secretary at our principal offices, which are located at 2795 East Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 400, Salt Lake City, Utah 84121, telephone number (801) 562-5556.

Members of our executive management team have significant experience in all aspects of the self-storage industry. The senior management team has collectively acquired and/or developed more than 725 properties since 1996 for the Company, the Predecessor and other entities. Our executive management team and their years of industry experience are as follows: Spencer F. Kirk, Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer, 9 years; Kent W. Christensen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, 12 years; Charles L. Allen, Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, 12 years, and Karl Haas, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, 22 years.

On February 2, 2009, we announced that Kenneth M. Woolley, former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, had accepted an invitation to serve a mission for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Mr. Woolley stepped down from his position as Chief Executive Officer beginning April 1, 2009. Our board of directors selected Mr. Kirk to succeed him as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The composition of the board of directors remained the same with the exception of the Chairman position which was assumed by Mr. Kirk.

Members of the executive management team have guided the Company through substantial growth, developing and acquiring over $4.0 billion in assets since 1996. This growth has been funded through public equity offerings and more than $2.0 billion in private equity capital since 1998. This private equity capital has come primarily from sophisticated, high net-worth individuals and institutional investors such as affiliates of Prudential Financial, Inc. and Fidelity Investments.

Our executive management and board of directors have a significant ownership position in the Company with executive officers and directors owning approximately 7,035,533 shares or 8.1% of our outstanding common stock as of February 12, 2010.

Self-storage facilities refers to properties that offer month-to-month storage space rental for personal or business use. Self-storage offers a cost-effective and flexible storage alternative. Tenants rent fully enclosed spaces that can vary in size according to their specific needs and to which they have unlimited, exclusive access. Tenants have responsibility for moving their items into and out of their units. Self-storage unit sizes typically range from five feet by five feet to 20 feet by 20 feet, with an interior height of eight to 12 feet. Properties generally have on-site managers who supervise and run the day-to-day operations, providing tenants with assistance as needed.

Self-storage provides a convenient way for individuals and businesses to store their possessions due to life changes, or simply because of a need for storage space. The mix of residential tenants using a self-storage property is determined by a property's local demographics and often includes people who are looking to downsize their living space or others who are not yet settled into a permanent residence. Items that residential tenants place in self-storage properties range from cars, boats and recreational vehicles, to furniture, household items and appliances. Commercial tenants tend to include small business owners who require easy and frequent access to their goods, records, inventory or storage for seasonal goods.

Our research has shown that tenants choose a self-storage property based primarily on the convenience of the site to their home or business, making high-density, high-traffic population centers ideal locations for self-storage properties. A property's perceived security and the general professionalism of the site managers and staff are also contributing factors to a site's ability to successfully secure rentals. Although most self-storage properties are leased to tenants on a month-to-month basis, tenants tend to continue their leases for extended periods of time.

There are seasonal fluctuations in occupancy rates for self-storage properties. Based on our experience, generally, there is increased leasing activity at self-storage properties during the summer months due to the higher number of people who relocate during this period. The highest level of occupancy is typically at the end of July, while the lowest level of occupancy is seen in late February and early March.

Since inception in the early 1970's, the self-storage industry has experienced significant growth. In the past ten years, there has been even greater growth. According to the Self-Storage Almanac (the

"Almanac"), in 1999 there were only 29,955 self-storage properties in the United States, with an average occupancy rate of 86.9% of net rentable square feet, compared to 48,721 self-storage properties in 2009 with an average occupancy rate of 76.7% of net rentable square feet. As population densities have increased in the United States, there has been an increase in self-storage awareness and corresponding development, which we expect will continue in the future.

Increased competition has affected our business and has led to both pricing and discount pressure. The increased competition has limited our ability to increase revenues in many markets in which we operate. Many markets have been able to absorb the increase in self-storage development due to superior demographics and density. However, select markets have not been able to absorb the new facilities and have not performed as well.

We have encountered competition when we have sought to acquire properties, especially for brokered portfolios. Aggressive bidding practices have been commonplace between both public and private entities, and this competition will likely continue to be a challenge for the Company's growth strategy.

The industry is also characterized by fragmented ownership. According to the Almanac, the top ten self-storage companies in the United States owned approximately 10.8% of total U.S. self-storage properties, and the top 50 self-storage companies owned approximately 14.9% of the total U.S. properties as of December 31, 2009. We believe this fragmentation will contribute to continued consolidation at some level in the future. We also believe that we are well positioned to be able to compete for acquisitions given our historical reputation for closing deals.

We are the second largest self-storage operator in the United States. We are one of four public self-storage REITs along with Public Storage Inc., Sovran Self-Storage, Inc., and U-Store-It Inc.

Our primary business objectives are to maximize cash flow available for distribution to our stockholders and to achieve sustainable long-term growth in cash flow per share in order to maximize long-term stockholder value. We continue to evaluate a range of growth initiatives and opportunities, including the following:

Generally, self-storage properties are subject to various laws, ordinances and regulations, including regulations relating to lien sale rights and procedures. Changes in any of these laws or regulations, as well as changes in laws, such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response and Compensation Liability Act ("CERCLA"), which increase the potential liability for environmental conditions or circumstances existing or created by tenants or others on properties, or laws affecting development, construction, operation, upkeep, safety and taxation may result in significant unanticipated expenditures, loss of self-storage sites or other impairments to operations, which would adversely affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the "ADA"), all places of public accommodation are required to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. These requirements became effective in 1992. A number of additional U.S. federal, state and local laws also exist that may require modifications to the properties, or restrict further renovations thereof, with respect to access thereto by disabled persons. Noncompliance with the ADA could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying feature, thereby requiring substantial capital expenditures. To the extent our properties are not in compliance, we are likely to incur additional costs to comply with the ADA.

Insurance activities are subject to state insurance laws and regulations as determined by the particular insurance commissioner for each state in accordance with the McCarran-Ferguson Act, and are subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the privacy regulations promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission pursuant thereto.

Property management activities are often subject to state real estate brokerage laws and regulations as determined by the particular real estate commission for each state.

Changes in any of the laws governing our conduct could have an adverse impact on our ability to conduct our business or could materially affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

As of February 12, 2010, we had 2,001 employees and believe our relationship with our employees to be good. Our employees are not represented by a collective bargaining agreement.

An investment in our securities involves various risks. All investors should carefully consider the following risk factors in conjunction with the other information contained in this Annual Report before trading in our securities. If any of the events set forth in the following risks actually occur, our business, operating results, prospects and financial condition could be harmed.

Our performance is subject to risks associated with real estate investments. We are a real estate company that derives our income from operation of our properties. There are a number of factors that may adversely affect the income that our properties generate, including the following:

Adverse economic or other conditions in the markets in which we do business could negatively affect our occupancy levels and rental rates and therefore our operating results.

Our operating results are dependent upon our ability to maximize occupancy levels and rental rates in our self-storage properties. Adverse economic or other conditions in the markets in which we operate may lower our occupancy levels and limit our ability to increase rents or require us to offer rental discounts. If our properties fail to generate revenues sufficient to meet our cash requirements, including operating and other expenses, debt service and capital expenditures, our net income, funds from operations ("FFO"), cash flow, financial condition, ability to make cash distributions to stockholders and the trading price of our securities could be adversely affected. The following factors, among others, may adversely affect the operating performance of our properties:

Recent U.S. and international market and economic conditions have been unprecedented and challenging, with tighter credit conditions and slower growth through the third and fourth quarters of 2008 and all of 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2009, continued concerns about the systemic impact of inflation, energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of credit and other macro-economic factors have contributed to increased market volatility and diminished expectations for the global economy and increased market uncertainty and instability. Continued turbulence in U.S. and international markets may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition, and the financial condition of our customers. If these market conditions continue, they may result in an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

If we are unable to promptly re-let our units or if the rates upon such re-letting are significantly lower than expected, then our business and results of operations would be adversely affected.

Virtually all of our leases are on a month-to-month basis. Any delay in re-letting units as vacancies arise would reduce our revenues and harm our operating results. In addition, lower than expected rental rates upon re-letting could adversely affect our revenues and impede our growth.

We depend upon our on-site personnel to maximize tenant satisfaction at each of our properties, and any difficulties we encounter in hiring, training and maintaining skilled field personnel may harm our operating performance.

We had 1,684 field personnel as of February 12, 2010 in the management and operation of our properties. The general professionalism of our site managers and staff are contributing factors to a site's ability to successfully secure rentals and retain tenants. We also rely upon our field personnel to maintain clean and secure self-storage properties. If we are unable to successfully recruit, train and retain qualified field personnel, the quality of service we strive to provide at our properties could be adversely affected which could lead to decreased occupancy levels and reduced operating performance.

Uninsured losses or losses in excess of our insurance coverage could adversely affect our financial condition and our cash flow.

We maintain comprehensive liability, fire, flood, earthquake, wind (as deemed necessary or as required by our lenders), extended coverage and rental loss insurance with respect to our properties. Certain types of losses, however, may be either uninsurable or not economically insurable, such as losses due to earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, riots, acts of war or terrorism. Should an uninsured loss occur, we could lose both our investment in and anticipated profits and cash flow from a property. In addition, if any such loss is insured, we may be required to pay significant amounts on any claim for recovery of such a loss prior to our insurer being obligated to reimburse us for the loss, or the amount of the loss may exceed our coverage for the loss. As a result, our operating results may be adversely affected.

Costs resulting from changes in real estate tax laws generally are not passed through to tenants directly and will affect us. Increases in income, property or other taxes generally are not passed through

to tenants under leases and may reduce our net income, FFO, cash flow, financial condition, ability to pay or refinance our debt obligations, ability to make cash distributions to stockholders, and the trading price of our securities. Similarly, changes in laws increasing the potential liability for environmental conditions existing on properties or increasing the restrictions on discharges or other conditions may result in significant unanticipated expenditures, which could similarly adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Environmental compliance costs and liabilities associated with operating our properties may affect our results of operations.

Under various U.S. federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, owners and operators of real estate may be liable for the costs of investigating and remediating certain hazardous substances or other regulated materials on or in such property. Such laws often impose such liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such substances or materials. The presence of such substances or materials, or the failure to properly remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner's or operator's ability to lease, sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral. Persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances or other regulated materials may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of such substances at a disposal or treatment facility, whether or not such facility is owned or operated by such person. Certain environmental laws impose liability for release of asbestos-containing materials into the air and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury associated with asbestos-containing materials.

Certain environmental laws also impose liability, without regard to knowledge or fault, for removal or remediation of hazardous substances or other regulated materials upon owners and operators of contaminated property even after they no longer own or operate the property. Moreover, the past or present owner or operator from which a release emanates could be liable for any personal injuries or property damages that may result from such releases, as well as any damages to natural resources that may arise from such releases.

Certain environmental laws impose compliance obligations on owners and operators of real property with respect to the management of hazardous materials and other regulated substances. For example, environmental laws govern the management of asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint. Failure to comply with these laws can result in penalties or other sanctions.

No assurances can be given that existing environmental studies with respect to any of our properties reveal all environmental liabilities, that any prior owner or operator of our properties did not create any material environmental condition not known to us, or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist as to any one or more of our properties. There also exists the risk that material environmental conditions, liabilities or compliance concerns may have arisen after the review was completed or may arise in the future. Finally, future laws, ordinances or regulations and future interpretations of existing laws, ordinances or regulations may impose additional material environmental liability.

Costs associated with complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 may result in unanticipated expenses.

Under the ADA, all places of public accommodation are required to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. These requirements became effective in 1992. A number of additional U.S. federal, state and local laws may also require modifications to our properties, or restrict certain further renovations of the properties, with respect to access thereto by disabled persons. Noncompliance with the ADA could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying feature,

which could result in substantial capital expenditures. We have not conducted an audit or investigation of all of our properties to determine our compliance and we cannot predict the ultimate cost of compliance with the ADA or other legislation. If one or more of our properties is not in compliance with the ADA or other legislation, then we would be required to incur additional costs to bring the facility into compliance. If we incur substantial costs to comply with the ADA or other legislation, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, per share trading price of our securities and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and to make cash distributions to our stockholders could be adversely affected.

Our investments in development and redevelopment projects may not yield anticipated returns, which would harm our operating results and reduce the amount of funds available for distributions.

To the extent that we engage in development and redevelopment activities, we will be subject to the following risks normally associated with these projects:

In deciding whether to develop or redevelop a particular property, we make certain assumptions regarding the expected future performance of that property. We may underestimate the costs necessary to bring the property up to the standards established for its intended market position or may be unable to increase occupancy at a newly acquired property as quickly as expected or at all. Any substantial unanticipated delays or expenses could adversely affect the investment returns from these development or redevelopment projects and harm our operating results, liquidity and financial condition, which could result in a decline in the value of our securities.

We may rely on the investments of our joint venture partners for funding certain of our development and redevelopment projects. If our reputation in the self-storage industry changes or the number of investors considering us an attractive strategic partner is otherwise reduced, our ability to develop or redevelop properties could be affected, which would limit our growth.

We face competition for the acquisition of self-storage properties and other assets, which may impede our ability to make future acquisitions or may increase the cost of these acquisitions.

We compete with many other entities engaged in real estate investment activities for acquisitions of self-storage properties and other assets, including national, regional and local operators and developers of self-storage properties. These competitors may drive up the price we must pay for self-storage properties or other assets we seek to acquire or may succeed in acquiring those properties or assets themselves. In addition, our potential acquisition targets may find our competitors to be more attractive suitors because they may have greater resources, may be willing to pay more or may have a more compatible operating philosophy. In addition, the number of entities and the amount of funds competing for suitable investment properties may increase. This competition would result in increased demand for these assets and therefore increased prices paid for them. Because of an increased interest in single-property acquisitions among tax-motivated individual purchasers, we may pay higher prices if we purchase single properties in comparison with portfolio acquisitions. If we pay higher prices for self-storage properties or other assets, our profitability will be reduced.

We may not be successful in identifying and consummating suitable acquisitions that meet our criteria, which may impede our growth.

Our ability to expand through acquisitions is integral to our business strategy and requires us to identify suitable acquisition candidates or investment opportunities that meet our criteria and are compatible with our growth strategy. We may not be successful in identifying suitable properties or other assets that meet our acquisition criteria or in consummating acquisitions or investments on satisfactory terms or at all. Failure to identify or consummate acquisitions will slow our growth, which could in turn adversely affect our stock price.

Our ability to acquire properties on favorable terms and successfully integrate and operate them may be constrained by the following significant risks:

In addition, strategic decisions by us, such as acquisitions, may adversely affect the price of our securities.

We may not be successful in integrating and operating acquired properties.

We expect to make future acquisitions of self-storage properties. If we acquire any self-storage properties, we will be required to integrate them into our existing portfolio. The acquired properties may turn out to be less compatible with our growth strategy than originally anticipated, may cause disruptions in our operations or may divert management's attention away from day-to-day operations, which could impair our results of operations as a whole.

We do not always obtain independent appraisals of our properties, and thus the consideration paid for these properties may exceed the value that may be indicated by third-party appraisals.

We do not always obtain third-party appraisals in connection with our acquisition of properties and the consideration being paid by us in exchange for those properties may exceed the value as determined by third-party appraisals. In such cases, the terms of any agreements and the valuation methods used to determine the value of the properties were determined by our senior management team.

Our business could be harmed if key personnel with long-standing business relationships in the self-storage industry terminate their employment with us.

Our success depends, to a significant extent, on the continued services of members of our executive management team. Our executive management team has substantial experience in the self-storage industry. In addition, our ability to develop properties in the future depends on the significant relationships our executive management team has developed with our institutional joint venture partners such as affiliates of Prudential Financial, Inc. There is no guarantee that any of them will remain employed by us. We do not maintain key person life insurance on any of our officers. The loss of services of one or more members of our executive management team could harm our business and our prospects.

We may change our investment and financing strategies and enter into new lines of business without stockholder consent, which may subject us to different risks.

We may change our investment and financing strategies and enter into new lines of business at any time without the consent of our stockholders, which could result in our making investments and engaging in business activities that are different from, and possibly riskier than, the investments and businesses described in this document. A change in our investment strategy or our entry into new lines of business may increase our exposure to other risks or real estate market fluctuations.

If other self-storage companies convert to an UPREIT structure or if tax laws change, we may no longer have an advantage in competing for potential acquisitions.

Because we are structured as an UPREIT, we are a more attractive acquirer of properties to tax-motivated sellers than our competitors that are not structured as UPREITs. However, if other self-storage companies restructure their holdings to become UPREITs, this competitive advantage will disappear. In addition, new legislation may be enacted or new interpretations of existing legislation may be issued by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"), or the U.S. Treasury Department that could affect the attractiveness of our UPREIT structure so that it may no longer assist us in competing for acquisitions.

Tax indemnification obligations may require the Operating Partnership to maintain certain debt levels.

In connection with the formation transactions entered into prior to our IPO in 2004, we agreed to make available to each of Kenneth M. Woolley, a director and our former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Richard S. Tanner, our Senior Vice President, Development, and other third parties, the following tax protections: for nine years, with a three-year extension if the applicable party continues to own at least 50% of the units in our Operating Partnership ("OP units") received by it in the formation transactions at the expiration of the initial nine-year period, the opportunity to (1) guarantee debt or (2) enter into a special loss allocation and deficit restoration obligation, in an aggregate amount, with respect to the foregoing contributors, of at least $60.0 million. Similar tax protections were provided to third party contributors in connection with property contributions to the Operating Partnership subsequent to the IPO. We agreed to these provisions in order to assist these contributors in preserving their tax position after their contributions. These obligations may require us to maintain certain indebtedness levels that we would not otherwise require for our business.

Our joint venture investments could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority.

As of December 31, 2009, we held interests in 352 operating properties through joint ventures. Some of these arrangements could be adversely affected by our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on co-venturers financial conditions and disputes between us and our co-venturers. We

expect to continue our joint venture strategy by entering into more joint ventures for the purpose of developing new self-storage properties and acquiring existing properties. In such event, we would not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority regarding the property, partnership, joint venture or other entity. The decision-making authority regarding the properties we currently hold through joint ventures is either vested exclusively with our joint venture partners, is subject to a majority vote of the joint venture partners or equally shared by us and the joint venture partners. In addition, investments in partnerships, joint ventures or other entities may, under certain circumstances, involve risks not present were a third party not involved, including the possibility that partners or co-venturers might become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions. Partners or co-venturers may have economic or other business interests or goals which are inconsistent with our business interests or goals, and may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives. Such investments may also have the potential risk of impasses on decisions, such as a sale, because neither we nor the partner or co-venturer would have full control over the partnership or joint venture. Disputes between us and partners or co-venturers may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and/or directors from focusing their time and efforts on our business. Consequently, actions by or disputes with partners or co-venturers might result in subjecting properties owned by the partnership or joint venture to additional risk. In addition, we may in certain circumstances be liable for the actions of our third-party partners or co-venturers, which could harm our financial condition.

Spencer F. Kirk, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, as well as certain other members of our senior management team, have outside business interests. These business interests include the ownership of a self-storage property located in Pico Rivera, California. Other than this property, the members of our senior management are not currently engaged in any other self-storage activities outside the Company. These outside business interests could interfere with their ability to devote time to our business and affairs as a result, our business could be harmed.

Conflicts of interest could arise as a result of our relationship with our Operating Partnership.

Conflicts of interest could arise in the future as a result of the relationships between us and our affiliates, and our Operating Partnership or any partner thereof. Our directors and officers have duties to our Company under applicable Maryland law in connection with their management of our Company. At the same time, we, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, have fiduciary duties, as a general partner, to our Operating Partnership and to the limited partners under Delaware law in connection with the management of our Operating Partnership. Our duties, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, as a general partner to our Operating Partnership and its partners may come into conflict with the duties of our directors and officers to our Company. The partnership agreement of our Operating Partnership does not require us to resolve such conflicts in favor of either our Company or the limited partners in our Operating Partnership. Unless otherwise provided for in the relevant partnership agreement, Delaware law generally requires a general partner of a Delaware limited partnership to adhere to fiduciary duty standards under which it owes its limited partners the highest duties of good faith, fairness, and loyalty and which generally prohibit such general partner from taking any action or engaging in any transaction as to which it has a conflict of interest.

Additionally, the partnership agreement expressly limits our liability by providing that neither we, our direct wholly-owned Massachusetts business trust subsidiary, as the general partner of the Operating Partnership, nor any of our or their trustees, directors or officers, will be liable or

accountable in damages to our Operating Partnership, the limited partners or assignees for errors in judgment, mistakes of fact or law or for any act or omission if we, or such trustee, director or officer, acted in good faith. In addition, our Operating Partnership is required to indemnify us, our affiliates and each of our respective trustees, officers, directors, employees and agents to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities (whether joint or several), expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees and other legal fees and expenses), judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts arising from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits or proceedings, civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, that relate to the operations of the Operating Partnership, provided that our Operating Partnership will not indemnify for (1) willful misconduct or a knowing violation of the law, (2) any transaction for which such person received an improper personal benefit in violation or breach of any provision of the partnership agreement, or (3) in the case of a criminal proceeding, the person had reasonable cause to believe the act or omission was unlawful.

The provisions of Delaware law that allow the common law fiduciary duties of a general partner to be modified by a partnership agreement have not been resolved in a court of law, and we have not obtained an opinion of counsel covering the provisions set forth in the partnership agreement that purport to waive or restrict our fiduciary duties that would be in effect under common law were it not for the partnership agreement.

We may pursue less vigorous enforcement of terms of contribution and other agreements because of conflicts of interest with certain of our officers.

Spencer F. Kirk, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Kent W. Christensen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Charles L. Allen, Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, and other members of our senior management team, and Kenneth M. Woolley, Director, had direct or indirect ownership interests in certain properties that were contributed to our Operating Partnership in the formation transactions. Following the completion of the formation transactions, we, under the agreements relating to the contribution of such interests, became entitled to indemnification and damages in the event of breaches of representations or warranties made by the contributors. None of these contribution and non-competition agreements was negotiated at an arm's-length basis. We may choose not to enforce, or to enforce less vigorously, our rights under these contribution and non-competition agreements because of our desire to maintain our ongoing relationships with the individuals party to these agreements.

Certain provisions of Maryland law and our organizational documents, including the stock ownership limit imposed by our charter, may inhibit market activity in our stock and could prevent or delay a change in control transaction.

Our charter, subject to certain exceptions, authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT and to limit any person to actual or constructive ownership of no more than 7.0% (by value or by number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding common stock or 7.0% (by value or by number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding capital stock. Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, may exempt a proposed transferee from the ownership limit. However, our board of directors may not grant an exemption from the ownership limit to any proposed transferee whose ownership could jeopardize our qualification as a REIT. These restrictions on ownership will not apply if our board of directors determines that it is no longer in our best interests to attempt to qualify, or to continue to qualify, as a REIT. The ownership limit may delay or impede a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our securities or otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders. Different ownership limits apply to the family of Kenneth M. Woolley, certain of his affiliates, family members and estates and trusts formed for the benefit of the foregoing and Spencer F. Kirk, certain of his

affiliates, family members and estates and trusts formed for the benefit of the foregoing and certain designated investment entities (as defined in our charter).

Our board of directors has the power to issue additional shares of our stock in a manner that may not be in the best interest of our stockholders.

Our charter authorizes our board of directors to issue additional authorized but unissued shares of common stock or preferred stock and to increase the aggregate number of authorized shares or the number of shares of any class or series without stockholder approval. In addition, our board of directors may classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common stock or preferred stock and set the preferences, rights and other terms of the classified or reclassified shares. Our board of directors could issue additional shares of our common stock or establish a series of preferred stock that could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control or other transaction that might involve a premium price for our securities or otherwise not be in the best interests of our stockholders.

Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to take action against our directors and officers are limited.

Maryland law provides that a director or officer has no liability in that capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. In addition, our charter eliminates our directors' and officers' liability to us and our stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from actual receipt of an improper benefit in money, property or services or active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment and which is material to the cause of action. Our bylaws require us to indemnify our directors and officers for liability resulting from actions taken by them in those capacities to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. As a result, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against our directors and officers than might otherwise exist under common law. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our directors and officers.

To the extent our distributions represent a return of capital for U.S. federal income tax purposes, our stockholders could recognize an increased capital gain upon a subsequent sale of common stock.

Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits and not treated by us as a dividend will not be taxable to a U.S. stockholder under current U.S. federal income tax law to the extent those distributions do not exceed the stockholder's adjusted tax basis in his, her, or its common stock, but instead will constitute a return of capital and will reduce such adjusted basis. If distributions result in a reduction of a stockholder's adjusted basis in such holder's common stock, subsequent sales of such holder's common stock will result in recognition of an increased capital gain or decreased capital loss due to the reduction in such adjusted basis.

Our primary business involves the ownership and operation of self-storage properties.

Our current strategy is to own, operate, manage, acquire, develop and redevelop only self-storage properties. Consequently, we are subject to risks inherent in investments in a single industry. Because investments in real estate are inherently illiquid, this strategy makes it difficult for us to diversify our investment portfolio and to limit our risk when economic conditions change. Decreases in market rents, negative tax, real estate and zoning law changes and changes in environmental protection laws may also increase our costs, lower the value of our investments and decrease our income, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Illiquidity of real estate investments could significantly impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties.

Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, our ability to promptly sell one or more properties in our portfolio in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions is limited. The real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand, that are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any property for the price or on the terms set by us or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We also cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property.

We may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We cannot assure you that we will have funds available to correct those defects or to make those improvements. In acquiring a property, we may agree to transfer restrictions that materially restrict us from selling that property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that property. These transfer restrictions would impede our ability to sell a property even if we deem it necessary or appropriate.

Any investments in unimproved real property may take significantly longer to yield income-producing returns, if at all, and may result in additional costs to us to comply with re-zoning restrictions or environmental regulations.

We have invested in the past, and may invest in the future, in unimproved real property. Unimproved properties generally take longer to yield income-producing returns based on the typical time required for development. Any development of unimproved property may also expose us to the risks and uncertainties associated with re-zoning the land for a higher use or development and environmental concerns of governmental entities and/or community groups. Any unsuccessful investments or delays in realizing an income-producing return or increased costs to develop unimproved real estate could restrict our ability to earn our targeted rate of return on an investment or adversely affect our ability to pay operating expenses which would harm our financial condition and operating results.

Any negative perceptions of the self-storage industry generally may result in a decline in our stock price.

To the extent that the investing public has a negative perception of the self-storage industry, the value of our securities may be negatively impacted, which could result in our securities trading below the inherent value of our assets.

Disruptions in the financial markets could affect our ability to obtain debt financing on reasonable terms and have other adverse effects on us.

The United States credit markets are experiencing significant dislocations and liquidity disruptions which have caused the spreads on prospective debt financings to widen. These circumstances have materially impacted liquidity in the debt markets, making financing terms for borrowers less attractive, and in certain cases have resulted in the unavailability of certain types of debt financing. Continued uncertainty in the credit markets may negatively impact our ability to access additional debt financing or to refinance existing debt maturities on favorable terms (or at all), which may negatively affect our ability to make acquisitions and fund development projects. A prolonged downturn in the credit markets may cause us to seek alternative sources of potentially less attractive financing, and may require us to adjust our business plan accordingly. In addition, these factors may make it more difficult for us to sell properties or may adversely affect the price we receive for properties that we do sell, as

prospective buyers may experience increased costs of debt financing or difficulties in obtaining debt financing. These events in the credit markets have also had an adverse effect on other financial markets in the United States, which may make it more difficult or costly for us to raise capital through the issuance of common stock, preferred stock or other equity securities. These disruptions in the financial markets may have other adverse effects on us or the economy generally, which could cause our stock price to decline.

Required payments of principal and interest on borrowings may leave us with insufficient cash to operate our properties or to pay the distributions currently contemplated or necessary to maintain our qualification as a REIT and may expose us to the risk of default under our debt obligations.

As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately $1.4 billion of outstanding indebtedness. We may incur additional debt in connection with future acquisitions and development. We may borrow under our Credit Lines or borrow new funds to finance these future properties. Additionally, we do not anticipate that our internally generated cash flow will be adequate to repay our existing indebtedness upon maturity and, therefore, we expect to repay our indebtedness through refinancings and equity and/or debt offerings. Further, we may need to borrow funds in order to make cash distributions to maintain our qualification as a REIT or to make our expected distributions.

If we are required to utilize our Credit Lines for purposes other than acquisition activity, this will reduce the amount available for acquisitions and could slow our growth. Therefore, our level of debt and the limitations imposed on us by our debt agreements could have significant adverse consequences, including the following:

We could become highly leveraged in the future because our organizational documents contain no limitation on the amount of debt we may incur.

Our organizational documents contain no limitations on the amount of indebtedness that we or our Operating Partnership may incur. We could alter the balance between our total outstanding indebtedness and the value of our portfolio at any time. If we become more highly leveraged, then the resulting increase in debt service could adversely affect our ability to make payments on our outstanding indebtedness and to pay our anticipated cash distributions and/or to continue to make cash distributions to maintain our REIT qualification, and could harm our financial condition.

Increases in interest rates may increase our interest expense and adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to service our indebtedness and make cash distributions to our stockholders.

As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately $1.4 billion of debt outstanding, of which approximately $304.1 million or 21.6% was subject to variable interest rates. This variable rate debt had a weighted average interest rate of approximately 3.3% per annum. Increases in interest rates on this variable rate debt would increase our interest expense, which could harm our cash flow and our ability to pay cash distributions. For example, if market rates of interest on this variable rate debt increased by 100 basis points, the increase in interest expense would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $3.0 million annually.

Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may adversely affect our results of operations.

In certain cases we may seek to manage our exposure to interest rate volatility by using interest rate hedging arrangements. Hedging involves risks, such as the risk that the counterparty may fail to honor its obligations under an arrangement. Failure to hedge effectively against interest rate changes may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our stockholders.

To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we may be forced to borrow funds on a short-term basis during unfavorable market conditions.

To qualify as a REIT, we generally must distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our net taxable income each year, excluding net capital gains, and we are subject to regular corporate income taxes to the extent that we distribute less than 100% of our net taxable income each year. In addition, we are subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which distributions made by us in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. While historically we have satisfied these distribution requirements by making cash distributions to our shareholders, a REIT is permitted to satisfy these requirements by making distributions of cash or other property, including, in limited circumstances, its own stock. For distributions with respect to taxable years ending on or before December 31, 2011, recent Internal Revenue Service guidance allows us to satisfy up to 90% of the distribution requirements discussed above through the distribution of shares of our stock, if certain conditions are met. Assuming we continue to satisfy these distributions requirements with cash, we may need to borrow funds on a short-term basis, or possibly long-term, to meet the REIT distribution requirements even if the then prevailing market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings. These borrowing needs could result from a difference in timing between the actual receipt of cash and inclusion of income for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or the effect of non-deductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or required debt amortization payments.

Dividends payable by REITs generally do not qualify for reduced tax rates.

The maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for dividends paid by domestic corporations to individual U.S. stockholders is 15% (through 2010). Dividends paid by REITs, however, are generally not eligible for the reduced rates. The more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate dividends could cause stockholders who are individuals to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs, including our securities.

In addition, the relative attractiveness of real estate in general may be adversely affected by the favorable tax treatment given to corporate dividends, which could negatively affect the value of our properties.

Possible legislative or other actions affecting REITs could adversely affect our stockholders.

The rules dealing with U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department. Changes to tax laws (which changes may have retroactive application) could adversely affect our stockholders. It cannot be predicted whether, when, in what forms, or with what effective dates, the tax laws applicable to us or our stockholders will be changed.

The power of our board of directors to revoke our REIT election without stockholder approval may cause adverse consequences to our stockholders.

Our charter provides that our board of directors may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interests to continue to qualify as a REIT. If we cease to qualify as a REIT, we would become subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income and would no longer be required to distribute most of our net taxable income to our stockholders, which may have adverse consequences on the total return to our stockholders.

Our failure to qualify as a REIT would have significant adverse consequences to us and the value of our stock.

We believe we operate in a manner that allows us to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under the Internal Revenue Code. If we fail to qualify as a REIT or lose our qualification as a REIT at any time, we will face serious tax consequences that would substantially reduce the funds available for distribution for each of the years involved because:

In addition, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will not be required to make distributions to stockholders, and all distributions to stockholders will be subject to tax as regular corporate dividends to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. This means that our U.S. individual stockholders would be taxed on our dividends at capital gains rates, and our U.S. corporate stockholders would be entitled to the dividends received deduction with respect to such dividends, subject, in each case, to applicable limitations under the Internal Revenue Code. If we fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and are able to avail ourselves of one or more of the relief

provisions under the Internal Revenue Code in order to maintain our REIT status, we may nevertheless be required to pay penalty taxes of $50,000 or more for each such failure. As a result of all these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT also could impair our ability to expand our business and raise capital, and could adversely affect the value of our securities.

Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. The complexity of these provisions and of the applicable Treasury regulations that have been promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code is greater in the case of a REIT that, like us, holds its assets through a partnership. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control may affect our ability to qualify as a REIT. In order to qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy a number of requirements, including requirements regarding the composition of our assets, the sources of our gross income and the owners of our stock. Our ability to satisfy the asset tests depends upon our analysis of the fair market value of our assets, some of which are not susceptible to precise determination, and for which we will not obtain independent appraisals. Also, we must make distributions to stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our net taxable income, excluding capital gains, and we will be subject to income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our net taxable income including capital gains. In addition, legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may adversely affect our investors, our ability to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes or the desirability of an investment in a REIT relative to other investments. Although we believe that we have been organized and have operated in a manner that is intended to allow us to qualify for taxation as a REIT, we can give no assurance that we have qualified or will continue to qualify as a REIT for tax purposes. We have not requested and do not plan to request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service regarding our qualification as a REIT.

Even though we qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we will be required to pay some U.S. federal, state and local taxes on our income and property. Extra Space Management, Inc. manages self-storage properties for our joint venture properties and properties owned by third parties. We, jointly with Extra Space Management, Inc., elected to treat Extra Space Management, Inc. as a "taxable REIT subsidiary" of our Company for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A taxable REIT subsidiary is a fully taxable corporation, and may be limited in its ability to deduct interest payments made to us. In addition, we will be subject to a 100% penalty tax on certain amounts if the economic arrangements among our tenants, our taxable REIT subsidiary and us are not comparable to similar arrangements among unrelated parties or if we receive payments for inventory or property held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. Also, if we sell property as a dealer (i.e., to customers in the ordinary course of our trade or business), we will be subject to a 100% penalty tax on any gain arising from such sales. While we don't intend to sell properties as a dealer, the IRS could take a contrary position. To the extent that we are or our taxable REIT subsidiary is required to pay U.S. federal, state or local taxes, we will have less cash available for distribution to stockholders.

Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.

To qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our stock. In order to meet these tests, we may be required to forego attractive business or investment opportunities. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may adversely affect our ability to operate solely to maximize profits.

As of December 31, 2009, we owned or had ownership interests in 642 operating self-storage properties. Of these properties, 290 are wholly-owned and 352 are held in joint ventures. In addition, we managed an additional 124 properties for franchisees or third parties bringing the total number of properties which we own and/or manage to 766. These properties are located in 33 states and Washington, D.C. We receive a management fee equal to approximately 6% of gross revenues to manage the joint venture, third party and franchise sites. As of December 31, 2009, we own and/or manage approximately 55 million square feet of rentable space configured in approximately 500,000 separate storage units. Approximately 70% of our properties are clustered around large population centers, such as Atlanta, Baltimore/Washington, D.C., Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, Orlando, Philadelphia, Phoenix, St. Petersburg/Tampa and San Francisco/Oakland. These markets contain above-average population and income demographics for new self-storage properties. The clustering of assets around these population centers enables us to reduce our operating costs through economies of scale. Our acquisitions have given us an increased scale in many core markets as well as a foothold in many markets where we had no previous presence.

We consider a property to be in the lease-up stage after it has been issued a certificate of occupancy, but before it has achieved stabilization. We consider a property to be stabilized once it has achieved either an 80% occupancy rate for a full year measured as of January 1, or has been open for three years.

As of December 31, 2009, over 350,000 tenants were leasing storage units at the 766 operating properties that we own and/or manage, primarily on a month-to-month basis, providing the flexibility to increase rental rates over time as market conditions permit. Although leases are short-term in duration, the typical tenant tends to remain at our properties for an extended period of time. For properties that were stabilized as of December 31, 2009, the median length of stay was approximately eleven months. The average annual rent per square foot at these stabilized properties was $13.46 at December 31, 2009 compared to $14.21 at December 31, 2008.

Our property portfolio is made up of different types of construction and building configurations depending on the site and the municipality where it is located. Most often sites are what we consider "hybrid" facilities, a mix of both drive-up buildings and multi-floor buildings. We have a number of multi-floor buildings with elevator access only, and a number of facilities featuring ground-floor access only.

The following table sets forth additional information regarding the occupancy of our stabilized properties on a state-by-state basis as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. The information as of December 31, 2008 is on a pro forma basis as though all the properties owned at December 31, 2009 were under our control as of December 31, 2008.

							Company		Pro forma

			Company		Pro forma		Company		Pro forma		Company			Pro forma
			Company		Pro forma		Net Rentable Square Feet as of December 31, 2009(2)		Net Rentable Square Feet as of December 31, 2008		Company			Pro forma
Location	Number of Properties		Number of Units as of December 31, 2009(1)		Number of Units as of December 31, 2008		Net Rentable Square Feet as of December 31, 2009(2)		Net Rentable Square Feet as of December 31, 2008		Square Foot Occupancy % December 31, 2009			Square Foot Occupancy % December 31, 2008
Wholly-owned properties
Alabama		1		587		582		77,600		76,260		79.4	%		78.6	%
Arizona		5		2,818		2,844		346,998		347,238		83.6	%		80.4	%
California		46		36,877		37,001		3,647,805		3,630,797		81.9	%		82.2	%
Colorado		8		3,790		3,803		476,484		476,409		84.4	%		82.7	%
Connecticut		3		2,023		2,028		178,040		178,115		78.9	%		75.5	%
Florida		31		20,490		20,571		2,184,586		2,186,056		81.9	%		80.8	%
Georgia		12		6,425		6,433		836,922		837,292		82.1	%		82.5	%
Hawaii		2		2,858		2,862		145,816		151,445		80.4	%		78.8	%
Illinois		5		3,320		3,263		341,724		339,844		79.9	%		79.9	%
Indiana		6		3,477		3,525		412,759		415,156		82.3	%		84.4	%
Kansas		1		507		506		50,190		49,940		82.2	%		87.1	%
Kentucky		3		1,578		1,583		194,051		194,220		88.9	%		84.2	%
Louisiana		2		1,412		1,408		150,335		148,915		81.8	%		87.0	%
Maryland		10		7,936		7,948		847,577		846,979		86.0	%		81.1	%
Massachusetts		26		15,241		15,276		1,569,495		1,573,680		83.3	%		81.4	%
Michigan		2		1,026		1,021		135,026		132,410		85.7	%		86.3	%
Missouri		6		3,141		3,159		374,292		374,587		82.4	%		80.0	%
Nevada		2		1,239		1,250		132,015		132,215		83.0	%		87.0	%
New Hampshire		2		1,006		1,006		125,473		125,909		88.2	%		84.7	%
New Jersey		23		18,801		18,860		1,834,626		1,838,021		84.7	%		82.6	%
New Mexico		1		541		541		71,555		69,030		78.7	%		83.9	%
New York		10		8,423		8,690		608,510		610,707		81.3	%		79.4	%
Ohio		4		2,024		2,032		273,532		274,132		85.9	%		85.8	%
Oregon		1		767		766		103,150		103,530		84.7	%		79.4	%
Pennsylvania		9		6,573		6,570		689,768		685,255		86.6	%		81.5	%
Rhode Island		1		722		730		75,521		75,521		81.3	%		89.0	%
South Carolina		3		1,553		1,554		178,749		178,719		83.4	%		83.1	%
Tennessee		6		3,694		3,492		488,334		474,047		79.9	%		82.8	%
Texas		20		12,378		12,423		1,403,414		1,402,493		85.0	%		84.7	%
Utah		3		1,543		1,540		210,749		210,876		80.7	%		84.4	%
Virginia		5		3,561		3,581		346,862		346,907		82.5	%		84.5	%
Washington		4		2,548		2,548		308,015		307,025		90.6	%		84.4	%

Total Wholly-Owned Stabilized		263		178,879		179,396		18,819,973		18,793,730		83.2	%		82.2	%

							Company		Pro forma

			Company		Pro forma		Company		Pro forma		Company			Pro forma
			Company		Pro forma		Net Rentable Square Feet as of December 31, 2009(2)		Net Rentable Square Feet as of December 31, 2008		Company			Pro forma
Location	Number of Properties		Number of Units as of December 31, 2009(1)		Number of Units as of December 31, 2008		Net Rentable Square Feet as of December 31, 2009(2)		Net Rentable Square Feet as of December 31, 2008		Square Foot Occupancy % December 31, 2009			Square Foot Occupancy % December 31, 2008
Joint-venture properties
Alabama		3		1,705		1,709		205,638		205,883		82.5	%		84.9	%
Arizona		11		6,829		6,861		751,889		751,364		82.6	%		84.2	%
California		77		55,187		55,140		5,634,040		5,636,931		84.2	%		85.0	%
Colorado		2		1,325		1,334		158,583		158,413		82.7	%		80.6	%
Connecticut		8		5,983		5,988		691,406		692,320		82.8	%		78.8	%
Delaware		1		584		588		71,680		71,655		92.2	%		82.9	%
Florida		23		19,079		19,238		1,937,868		1,938,511		81.4	%		80.2	%
Georgia		3		1,871		1,885		245,520		246,926		80.1	%		77.1	%
Illinois		7		4,661		4,670		503,416		503,316		83.3	%		84.1	%
Indiana		7		2,769		2,769		366,173		365,803		86.4	%		80.9	%
Kansas		3		1,211		1,214		160,060		161,240		79.1	%		79.7	%
Kentucky		4		2,268		2,285		268,886		268,434		83.1	%		83.7	%
Maryland		14		11,055		11,110		1,085,468		1,081,927		84.5	%		81.4	%
Massachusetts		17		9,252		9,243		1,049,070		1,046,534		81.6	%		80.0	%
Michigan		10		5,917		5,930		784,683		784,263		81.8	%		82.5	%
Missouri		2		956		956		118,045		117,795		80.2	%		82.9	%
Nevada		7		4,615		4,614		619,273		618,998		82.8	%		81.8	%
New Hampshire		3		1,316		1,317		137,434		137,754		84.2	%		84.1	%
New Jersey		21		15,656		15,680		1,647,200		1,648,331		83.0	%		80.4	%
New Mexico		9		4,673		4,691		542,799		538,144		82.9	%		81.9	%
New York		21		21,638		21,645		1,733,870		1,735,650		86.2	%		84.3	%
Ohio		11		5,008		5,019		754,447		754,187		79.3	%		78.0	%
Oregon		2		1,290		1,294		136,290		136,980		84.2	%		79.1	%
Pennsylvania		10		7,224		7,228		764,860		764,300		85.0	%		83.9	%
Rhode Island		1		607		607		73,880		73,880		71.5	%		73.3	%
Tennessee		22		11,753		11,784		1,547,896		1,547,846		82.8	%		81.7	%
Texas		18		11,697		11,738		1,548,180		1,549,071		83.5	%		80.4	%
Utah		1		520		519		59,000		59,050		81.7	%		83.7	%
Virginia		16		11,275		11,282		1,191,293		1,191,543		85.3	%		83.6	%
Washington		1		546		551		62,730		62,730		86.4	%		83.4	%
Washington, DC		1		1,536		1,536		102,003		102,003		91.7	%		88.5	%

Total Stabilized Joint-Ventures		336		230,006		230,425		24,953,580		24,951,782		83.4	%		82.4	%

Managed properties
Alabama		2		783		825		95,899		95,175		81.2	%		80.6	%
California		5		3,371		3,366		399,460		399,070		72.2	%		72.4	%
Colorado		1		339		339		31,629		31,639		87.9	%		82.1	%
Florida		1		651		650		52,066		51,966		85.2	%		84.4	%
Georgia		5		2,705		2,726		401,289		406,476		73.3	%		72.3	%
Illinois		4		2,319		2,328		261,219		263,120		72.4	%		69.8	%
Indiana		1		502		499		55,425		55,425		67.5	%		64.0	%
Kansas		3		1,518		1,534		226,120		225,460		71.3	%		68.8	%
Kentucky		1		532		541		66,000		65,900		76.6	%		72.6	%
Maryland		12		7,627		7,678		842,865		848,038		74.3	%		72.4	%
Massachusetts		1		1,168		1,198		108,830		108,880		64.4	%		58.2	%
Missouri		3		1,532		1,525		305,138		306,333		72.9	%		76.4	%
Nevada		2		1,576		1,576		170,775		171,555		81.8	%		80.3	%
New Jersey		5		4,322		4,341		418,450		419,775		81.9	%		75.9	%
New Mexico		2		1,101		1,106		131,857		131,767		85.0	%		81.2	%
New York		1		704		703		83,055		77,955		81.5	%		81.2	%
Ohio		4		1,087		1,095		161,760		162,200		59.3	%		57.5	%
Pennsylvania		20		8,380		8,379		1,017,521		1,022,897		63.6	%		60.8	%
Tennessee		2		883		883		131,140		130,385		84.2	%		83.6	%
Texas		4		2,231		2,244		300,015		301,519		82.7	%		85.1	%
Utah		1		371		371		46,805		46,905		96.7	%		98.1	%
Virginia		4		2,767		2,782		274,583		270,202		83.0	%		79.0	%
Washington, DC		2		1,263		1,255		112,459		111,759		87.2	%		82.8	%

Total Stabilized Managed Properties		86		47,732		47,944		5,694,360		5,704,401		74.2	%		72.3	%

Total Stabilized Properties		685		456,617		457,765		49,467,913		49,449,913		82.3	%		81.1	%

The following table sets forth additional information regarding the occupancy of our lease-up properties on a state-by-state basis as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. The information as of December 31, 2008 is on a pro forma basis as though all the properties owned at December 31, 2009 were under our control as of December 31, 2008.

							Company		Pro forma

			Company		Pro forma		Company		Pro forma		Company			Pro forma
			Company		Pro forma		Net Rentable Square Feet as of December 31, 2009(2)		Net Rentable Square Feet as of December 31, 2008		Company			Pro forma
Location	Number of Properties		Number of Units as of December 31, 2009(1)		Number of Units as of December 31, 2008		Net Rentable Square Feet as of December 31, 2009(2)		Net Rentable Square Feet as of December 31, 2008		Square Foot Occupancy % December 31, 2009			Square Foot Occupancy % December 31, 2008
Wholly-owned properties
California		11		8,029		4,283		867,459		463,433		36.2	%		29.4	%
Florida		3		2,710		816		260,830		72,345		15.8	%		0.0	%
Illinois		4		2,689		2,745		276,265		276,315		50.2	%		23.9	%
Maryland		2		1,394		1,408		149,937		149,758		55.1	%		27.0	%
Massachusetts		3		2,125		2,067		211,652		215,532		65.2	%		58.4	%
New Jersey		1		636		633		57,190		57,140		64.3	%		27.5	%
Oregon		1		744		—		76,375		—		7.5	%		0.0	%
South Carolina		1		622		488		74,657		59,367		85.4	%		82.2	%

Total Wholly-Owned Lease up		27		19,578		13,007		2,050,976		1,360,554		42.0	%		33.8	%

Joint-venture properties
California		7		4,860		2,870		531,948		329,192		43.5	%		56.9	%
Florida		1		894		906		113,485		108,085		53.3	%		38.4	%
Illinois		4		2,796		2,835		298,605		298,569		70.0	%		68.0	%
Maryland		1		853		855		71,349		71,349		73.7	%		74.4	%
New Jersey		2		1,329		712		127,380		60,098		22.6	%		0.0	%
Rhode Island		1		482		494		55,985		55,805		74.0	%		56.1	%

Total Lease up Joint-Ventures		16		11,214		8,672		1,198,752		923,098		52.0	%		56.4	%

Managed properties
Alabama		1		627		—		77,452		—		10.6	%		0.0	%
California		2		1,737		1,594		236,174		189,080		50.9	%		49.4	%
Colorado		1		508		536		61,070		60,870		78.4	%		45.3	%
Florida		8		5,449		1,396		508,315		134,751		24.8	%		23.5	%
Georgia		10		5,388		5,099		764,217		667,413		45.4	%		32.6	%
Massachusetts		3		2,156		1,590		204,327		151,529		49.9	%		46.5	%
New Jersey		1		848		860		77,895		77,905		57.4	%		45.8	%
New York		1		914		—		46,197		—		21.9	%		0.0	%
Pennsylvania		2		1,990		1,994		173,019		174,211		39.8	%		27.3	%
Tennessee		1		505		510		69,550		68,960		62.1	%		45.4	%
Utah		1		653		—		75,451		—		61.2	%		0.0	%
Virginia		1		476		480		63,709		63,809		45.0	%		22.1	%

Total Lease up Managed Properties		38		25,711		16,485		2,770,935		1,802,539		40.2	%		37.6	%

Total Lease up Properties		81		56,503		38,164		6,020,663		4,086,191		43.2	%		40.6	%

We are involved in various litigation and legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. We are not a party to any material litigation or legal proceedings, or to the best of our knowledge, any threatened litigation or legal proceedings which, in the opinion of management, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations either individually or in the aggregate.

There were no matters submitted to a vote of our security holders during the quarter ended December 31, 2009.

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "EXR" since our IPO on August 17, 2004. Prior to that time there was no public market for our common stock.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales price for our common stock as reported by the NYSE and the per share dividends declared:

On February 12, 2010, the closing price of our common stock as reported by the NYSE was $11.36. At February 12, 2010, we had 268 holders of record of our common stock.

Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to receive distributions when declared by our board of directors out of any assets legally available for that purpose. As a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our "REIT taxable income," which is generally equivalent to our net taxable ordinary income, determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid to our stockholders annually in order to maintain our REIT qualification for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Information about our equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference in Item 12 of Part III of this annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following table sets forth the selected financial data and should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and notes thereto included in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" and Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this Form 10-K. (Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data.)

			For the Year Ended December 31,

			2009			2008			2007			2006			2005
						(As Revised)			(As Revised)
Revenues:
	Property rental		$	238,256		$	235,695		$	206,315		$	170,993		$	120,640
	Fees, tenant reinsurance and other income			42,220			37,556			32,551			26,271			14,088

		Total revenues		280,476			273,251			238,866			197,264			134,728

Expenses:
	Property operations			88,935			84,522			73,070			62,243			45,963
	Tenant reinsurance			5,461			5,066			4,710			2,328			1,023
	Unrecovered development and acquisition costs and severance			21,236			1,727			765			269			302
	General and administrative			40,554			39,908			36,722			35,600			24,081
	Depreciation and amortization			52,403			49,566			39,801			37,172			31,005

		Total expenses		208,589			180,789			155,068			137,612			102,374

Income from operations				71,887			92,462			83,798			59,652			32,354
Interest expense				(69,818	)		(68,671	)		(64,045	)		(50,953	)		(42,549	)
Interest income				6,432			8,249			10,417			2,469			1,625
Gain on repurchase of exchangeable senior notes				27,928			6,311			—			—			—
Loss on investments available for sale				—			(1,415	)		(1,233	)		—			—
Fair value adjustment of obligation associated with Preferred Operating Partnership units				—			—			1,054			—			—

Income (loss) before equity in earnings of real estate ventures and income tax expense				36,429			36,936			29,991			11,168			(8,570	)
Equity in earnings of real estate ventures				6,964			6,932			5,300			4,693			3,170
Income tax expense				(4,300	)		(519	)		—			—			—

Net income (loss)				39,093			43,349			35,291			15,861			(5,400	)
Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership and other				(7,116	)		(7,568	)		(3,562	)		(985	)		434
Fixed distribution paid to Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder				—			—			(1,510	)		—			—

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders			$	31,977		$	35,781		$	30,219		$	14,876		$	(4,966	)

Net income (loss) per common share
	Basic		$	0.37		$	0.46		$	0.47		$	0.27		$	(0.14	)
	Diluted		$	0.37		$	0.46		$	0.46		$	0.27		$	(0.14	)
Weighted average number of shares
	Basic			86,343,029			76,996,754			64,900,713			55,117,021			35,481,538
	Diluted			91,082,834			82,352,988			70,715,640			59,409,836			35,481,538
Cash dividends paid per common share			$	0.38		$	1.00		$	0.93		$	0.91		$	0.91
Balance Sheet Data
Total assets			$	2,407,556		$	2,291,008		$	2,054,075		$	1,669,825		$	1,420,192
Total notes payable, notes payable to trusts and lines of credit			$	1,402,977		$	1,286,820		$	1,299,997		$	948,174		$	866,783
Noncontrolling interests			$	62,040		$	68,023		$	66,217		$	35,158		$	36,235
Total stockholders' equity			$	884,179		$	878,770		$	638,461		$	643,555		$	480,128
Other Data
Net cash provided by operating activities			$	81,165		$	98,391		$	102,096		$	76,885		$	17,463
Net cash used in investing activities			$	(104,410	)	$	(224,481	)	$	(254,344	)	$	(239,778	)	$	(614,834	)
Net cash provided by financing activities			$	91,223		$	172,685		$	98,824		$	205,041		$	601,695

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. We make statements in this section that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. For a complete discussion of forward-looking statements, see the section in this Form 10-K entitled "Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Information." Certain risk factors may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the following discussion. For a discussion of such risk factors, see the section in this Form 10-K entitled "Risk Factors." (Amounts in thousands, except share and per share data.)

We are a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, formed to continue the business commenced in 1977 by our predecessor companies to own, operate, manage, acquire, develop and redevelop professionally managed self-storage properties. Since 1996, our fully integrated development and acquisition teams have completed the development or acquisition of more than 725 self-storage properties.

At December 31, 2009, we owned, had ownership interests in, or managed 766 operating properties in 33 states and Washington, D.C. Of these 766 operating properties, 290 were wholly-owned, we held joint venture interests in 352 properties, and our taxable REIT subsidiary, Extra Space Management, Inc., operated an additional 124 properties that are owned by franchisees or third parties in exchange for a management fee. These operating properties contain approximately 55 million square feet of rentable space contained in approximately 500,000 units and currently serve a customer base of over 350,000 tenants.

Our properties are generally situated in convenient, highly visible locations clustered around large population centers such as Atlanta, Baltimore/Washington, D.C., Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, Orlando, Philadelphia, Phoenix, St. Petersburg/Tampa and San Francisco/Oakland. These areas all enjoy above average population growth and income levels. The clustering of our assets around these population centers enables us to reduce our operating costs through economies of scale. We consider a property to be in the lease-up stage after it has been issued a certificate of occupancy, but before it has achieved stabilization. A property is considered to be stabilized once it has achieved an 80% occupancy rate for a full year measured as of January 1, or has been open for three years.

To maximize the performance of our properties, we employ a state-of-the-art, web-based tracking and yield management technology called STORE. Developed by our management team, STORE enables us to analyze, set and adjust rental rates in real time across our portfolio in order to respond to changing market conditions. In addition, we also have an industry leading revenue management system called "RevMan." We believe that the combination of STORE's yield management capabilities and the systematic processes developed by our team using RevMan allows us to more proactively manage revenues.

We derive substantially all of our revenues from rents received from tenants under existing leases at each of our self-storage properties, from management fees on the properties we manage for joint-venture partners, franchisees and unaffiliated third parties and from our tenant reinsurance program. Our management fee is equal to approximately 6% of total revenues generated by the managed properties.

We operate in competitive markets, often where consumers have multiple self-storage properties from which to choose. Competition has impacted, and will continue to impact our property results. We experience seasonal fluctuations in occupancy levels, with occupancy levels generally higher in the summer months due to increased moving activity. Our operating results depend materially on our

ability to lease available self-storage units, to actively manage unit rental rates, and on the ability of our tenants to make required rental payments. We believe that we are able to respond quickly and effectively to changes in local, regional and national economic conditions by adjusting rental rates through the use of STORE, and through the use of RevMan.

We continue to evaluate and implement a range of new initiatives and opportunities in order to enable us to maximize stockholder value. Our strategies to maximize stockholder value include the following:

During 2009, we acquired two wholly-owned properties and completed the development of 12 properties, all in our core markets. Of the completed development properties, eight are wholly-owned and consolidated, and four are owned by us in joint ventures, three of which are consolidated. We have ten wholly-owned development properties remaining that are scheduled for completion through 2010 and 2011.

Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including those that impact our most critical accounting policies. We base our estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates. We believe the following are our most critical accounting policies:

CONSOLIDATION: Arrangements that are not controlled through voting or similar rights are accounted for as variable interest entities ("VIEs"). An enterprise is required to consolidate a VIE if it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE.

A VIE is created when (i) the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, or (ii) the entity's equity holders as a group either: (a) lack direct or indirect ability to make decisions about the entity through voting or similar rights, (b) are not obligated to absorb expected losses of the entity if

they occur, or (c) do not have the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity if they occur. If an entity is deemed to be a VIE, the enterprise that is deemed to absorb a majority of the expected losses or receive a majority of expected residual returns of the VIE is considered the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE.

We have concluded that under certain circumstances when we (1) enter into option agreements for the purchase of land or facilities from an entity and pay a non-refundable deposit, or (2) enter into arrangements for the formation of joint ventures, a VIE may be created under condition (i), (ii) (b) or (c) of the previous paragraph. For each VIE created, we have considered expected losses and residual returns based on the probability of future cash flows. If we are determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE, the assets, liabilities and operations of the VIE are consolidated with our financial statements. Additionally, our Operating Partnership has notes payable to three trusts that are VIEs under condition (ii)(a) above. Since the Operating Partnership is not the primary beneficiary of the trusts, these VIEs are not consolidated.

REAL ESTATE ASSETS: Real estate assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Direct and allowable internal costs associated with the development, construction, renovation, and improvement of real estate assets are capitalized. Interest, property taxes, and other costs associated with development incurred during the construction period are capitalized.

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Major replacements and betterments that improve or extend the life of the asset are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the buildings and improvements, which are generally between five and 39 years.

In connection with our acquisition of properties, the purchase price is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their fair values, which are estimated using significant unobservable inputs. The value of the tangible assets, consisting of land and buildings, are determined as if vacant, that is, at replacement cost. Intangible assets, which represent the value of existing tenant relationships, are recorded at their fair values. We measure the value of tenant relationships based on the amount of time required to replace existing customers which is based on our historical experience with turnover in our facilities. Debt assumed as part of an acquisition is recorded at fair value based on current interest rates compared to contractual rates. Acquisition-related transaction costs are expensed as incurred.

Intangible lease rights include: (1) purchase price amounts allocated to leases on two properties that cannot be classified as ground or building leases; these rights are amortized to expense over the term of the leases and (2) intangibles related to ground leases on four properties where the ground leases were assumed by the Company at rates that were different than the current market rates for similar leases. The value associated with these assumed leases were recorded as intangibles, which will be amortized over the lease terms.

EVALUATION OF ASSET IMPAIRMENT: We evaluate long lived assets held for use when events or circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. We review each property at least annually to determine if any such events or circumstances have occurred or exist. We focus on properties where occupancy and/or rental income have decreased by a significant amount. For these properties, we determine whether the decrease is temporary or permanent and whether the property will likely recover the lost occupancy and/or revenue in the short term. In addition, we carefully review properties in the lease-up stage and compare actual operating results to original projections.

When we determine that an event that may indicate impairment has occurred, we compare the carrying value of the related long-lived assets to the undiscounted future net operating cash flows attributable to the assets. An impairment loss is recorded if the net carrying value of the assets exceeds

the undiscounted future net operating cash flows attributable to the assets. The impairment loss recognized equals the excess of net carrying value over the related fair value of the assets.

When real estate assets are identified as held for sale, we discontinue depreciating the assets and estimate the fair value of the assets, net of selling costs, using significant unobservable inputs. If the estimated fair values, net of selling costs, of the assets that have been identified for sale are less than the net carrying value of the assets, then a valuation allowance is established. The operations of assets held for sale or sold during the period are generally presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, other financial instruments included in other assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses, variable rate notes payable, lines of credit and other liabilities reflected in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2009 and 2008 approximate fair value. The fair values of our notes receivable and our fixed rate notes payable are as follows:

INVESTMENTS IN REAL ESTATE VENTURES: Our investments in real estate joint ventures where we have significant influence but not control, and joint ventures which are VIEs in which we are not the primary beneficiary, are recorded under the equity method of accounting on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Under the equity method, our investment in real estate ventures is stated at cost and adjusted for our share of net earnings or losses and reduced by distributions. Equity in earnings of real estate ventures is generally recognized based on our ownership interest in the earnings of each of the unconsolidated real estate ventures. For the purposes of presentation in the statement of cash flows, we follow the "look through" approach for classification of distributions from joint ventures. Under this approach, distributions are reported under operating cash flow unless the facts and circumstances of a specific distribution clearly indicate that it is a return of capital (e.g., a liquidating dividend or distribution of the proceeds from the joint venture's sale of assets) in which case it is reported as an investing activity.

Our management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of our investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures may be impaired annually and when events or circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. An investment is impaired if management's estimate of the fair value of the investment, using significant unobservable inputs, is less than its carrying value. To the extent impairment has occurred and is considered to be other than temporary, the loss is measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the fair value of the investment.

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES: The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.

For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative and the hedged item related to the hedged risk are recognized in earnings. For derivatives designated as cash

flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income, outside of earnings and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings.

CONVERSION OF OPERATING PARTNERSHIP UNITS: Conversions of Operating Partnership units to common stock, when converted under the original provisions of the Operating Partnership agreement, are accounted for by reclassifying the underlying net book value of the units from noncontrolling interest to our equity. The difference between the fair value of the consideration paid and the adjustment to the carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest is recognized as additional paid in capital of the Company.

REVENUE AND EXPENSE RECOGNITION: Rental revenues are recognized as earned based upon amounts that are currently due from tenants. Leases are generally on month-to-month terms. Prepaid rents are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the leases. Promotional discounts are recognized as a reduction to rental income over the promotional period. Late charges, administrative fees, merchandise sales and truck rentals are recognized in income when earned. Management and franchise fee revenues are recognized monthly as services are performed and in accordance with the terms of the related management agreements. Tenant reinsurance premiums are recognized as revenues over the period of insurance coverage. Equity in earnings of real estate entities is recognized based on our ownership interest in the earnings of each of the unconsolidated real estate entities. Interest income is recognized as earned.

Property expenses, including utilities, property taxes, repairs and maintenance and other costs to manage the facilities are recognized as incurred. We accrue for property tax expense based upon invoice amounts, estimates and historical trends. If these estimates are incorrect, the timing of expense recognition could be affected.

REAL ESTATE SALES: In general, sales of real estate and related profits/losses are recognized when all consideration has changed hands and risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred. Certain types of continuing involvement preclude sale treatment and related profit recognition; other forms of continuing involvement allow for sale recognition but require deferral of profit recognition.

INCOME TAXES: We have elected to be treated as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, among other things, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders and meet certain tests regarding the nature of our income and assets. As a REIT, we are not subject to federal income tax with respect to that portion of our income which meets certain criteria and is distributed annually to our stockholders. We plan to continue to operate so that we meet the requirements for taxation as a REIT. Many of these requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. If we were to fail to meet these requirements, we would be subject to federal income tax. We are subject to certain state and local taxes. Provision for such taxes has been included in property operating and general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.

We have elected to treat one of our corporate subsidiaries, Extra Space Management, Inc., as a taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS"). In general, our TRS may perform additional services for tenants and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate related business (except for the operation or management of health care facilities or lodging facilities or the provision to any person, under a franchise, license or otherwise, of rights to any brand name under which any lodging facility or health care facility is operated). A TRS is subject to corporate federal income tax. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions will be recognized in income tax expense when incurred.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION: The measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards to employees and directors are based on estimated fair values. Awards are valued at fair value and recognized on a straight line basis over the service periods of each award.

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167, "Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)," ("FAS 167"), (Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 810), which amends guidance for determining whether an entity is a VIE, and requires the performance of a qualitative rather than a quantitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Under this guidance, an entity would be required to consolidate a VIE if it has (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE. This guidance is effective for the first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, with early adoption prohibited. We are currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of this guidance on its financial statements. As a result of this guidance we may be required to consolidate or deconsolidate certain of our joint ventures.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2009 to the Year Ended December 31, 2008

Results for the year ended December 31, 2009 included the operations of 642 properties (298 of which were consolidated and 344 of which were in joint ventures accounted for using the equity method) compared to the results for the year ended December 31, 2008, which included operations of 627 properties (283 of which were consolidated and 344 of which were in joint ventures accounted for using the equity method). Results for both periods also included equity in earnings of real estate ventures, third-party management and franchise fees, tenant reinsurance and other income.

The following table sets forth information on revenues earned for the years indicated:

Property Rental—The increase in property rental revenues consists of $8,554 associated with acquisitions and consolidations completed in 2009 and 2008 and $2,462 associated with increases in occupancy and rental rates at lease-up properties. These increases were offset by a decrease of $8,455 in revenues at stabilized properties mainly due to a decreased incoming rental rates and a decrease in average occupancy compared with the prior year.

Management and Franchise Fees—Our taxable REIT subsidiary, Extra Space Management, Inc., manages properties owned by our joint ventures, franchisees and third parties. Management fees generally represent 6% of cash collected from properties owned by third party, franchisees and unconsolidated joint ventures. Revenues from management and franchise fees have remained fairly stable compared to the previous year. Decreased revenues at our joint venture, franchise, and third-party managed sites related to rental rate and average occupancy decreases have been offset by additional management fees earned as a result of additional third party properties managed in 2009 compared to the prior year.

Tenant Reinsurance—The increase in tenant reinsurance revenues is due to the fact that during the year ended December 31, 2009, we successfully increased overall customer participation to approximately 54% at December 31, 2009 compared to approximately 47% at December 31, 2008.

Other Income—The decrease in other income is primarily due to the expiration of a sublease agreement.

Property Operations—The increase in property operations expense in 2009 was primarily due to increases of $2,313 associated with acquisitions completed in 2009 and 2008. Expenses also increased by $2,721 at existing properties related to increases in expenses at lease-up properties. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in expenses at stabilized properties of $344.

Tenant Reinsurance—Tenant reinsurance expense represents the costs that are incurred to provide tenant reinsurance. The increase in tenant reinsurance expense is related to the increase in overall customer participation in the tenant reinsurance program to approximately 54% at December 31, 2009 compared to approximately 47% at December 31, 2008.

Unrecovered Development and Acquisition Costs—These costs relate to unsuccessful development and acquisition activities during the periods indicated. On June 2, 2009, the Company announced that it had begun a wind-down of its development program. As a result of this decision, the Company recorded $18,883 of one-time impairment charges in order to write down the carrying value of undeveloped land, development projects that will be completed and investments in development projects to their estimated fair values less cost to sell. The unrecovered development and acquisition costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2008 include $1,257 relating to due diligence costs that were part of an unsuccessful attempt by the Company to purchase a large portfolio of properties during the second quarter of 2008. The remainder of these costs relate to entitlement and other due diligence work done on development projects that the Company elected not to pursue.

Severance Costs—On June 2, 2009, the Company announced that it had begun a wind-down of its development program. As a result of this decision, the Company recorded severance costs of $1,400. In December 2009, the Company began the closure of its marketing office in Memphis, TN. As a result of this closure, the Company recorded severance costs of $825.

General and Administrative—General and administrative expenses increased nominally when compared to the prior year while the number of properties under management increased by approximately 10%. The Company operated 766 properties as of December 31, 2009, compared to 694 at December 31, 2008.

Depreciation and Amortization—The increase in depreciation and amortization expense is a result of additional properties that have been added through acquisition and development throughout 2009 and 2008.

The following table sets forth information on other revenue and expenses for the years indicated:

Interest Expense—The increase in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 was due primarily to the increases in our total notes payable and line of credit balances when compared to the prior year. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the interest paid related to our Exchangeable Notes due to the repurchase of a total principal amount of $162,337 during 2008 and 2009.

Non-cash Interest Expense Related to Amortization of Discount on Exchangeable Senior Notes—The decrease in non-cash interest expense related to amortization of discount on exchangeable senior notes for the year ended December 31, 2009 when compared to the prior year was due to the repurchase of a total principal amount of $162,337 of its notes during 2009 and 2008. The discount associated with the repurchase of the notes was written off as a result of these repurchases which decreased the ongoing amortization of the discount in 2009 when compared to 2008.

Interest Income—Interest income earned in 2008 was primarily due to interest on the net proceeds from the sales of common stock in May and October 2008. There were no such sales of common stock during the year ended December 31, 2009.

Interest Income on Note Receivable from Preferred Operating Partnership Unit Holder —Represents interest on a $100,000 loan to the holder of the Series A Participating Redeemable Preferred units of our Operating Partnership (the "Preferred OP units").

Gain on Repurchase of Exchangeable Senior Notes—This amount represents the gain on the repurchase of $122,000 total principal amount of our exchangeable senior notes during 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we repurchased $40,337 principal amount of exchangeable senior notes resulting in a smaller gain compared to the year ended December 31, 2009.

Loss on Sale of Investments Available for Sale—This amount represents the loss recorded on February 29, 2008 related to the liquidation of auction rate securities held in investments available for sale. We had no investments available for sale during the year ended December 31, 2009.

Equity in Earnings of Real Estate Ventures—The change in equity in earnings of real estate ventures for the year ended December 31, 2009 relates to an increase of $753 from our purchase of an additional 40% interest in the VRS Self Storage LLC joint venture on July 1, 2008. This increase was offset by decreases in income at the properties owned by the real estate joint ventures.

Income Tax Expense—The increase in income tax expense relates primarily to our net operating loss carryforward being used completely during 2008 and to the increased profitability of our TRS in 2009.

The following table sets forth information on net income allocated to noncontrolling interests for the years indicated:

Net Income Allocated to Preferred Operating Partnership Noncontrolling Interests —Income allocated to the Preferred Operating Partnership equals the fixed distribution paid to the Preferred OP unit holder plus approximately 1.1% of the remaining net income allocated after the adjustment for the fixed distribution paid for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. The amount allocated to noncontrolling interest was lower in 2009 than in 2008 as our net income was lower in 2009 than it was in 2008.

Net Income Allocated to Operating Partnership and Other Noncontrolling Interests —Income allocated to the Operating Partnership represents approximately 4.4% and 4.7% of net income after the allocation of the fixed distribution paid to the Preferred OP unit holder for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in the amount allocated to the noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership was due to two factors: (1) a decrease in net income in 2009; and (2) a decrease in the percentage of income allocated to the noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership as a result of the redemption of 637,600 OP units for cash and common stock during the year ended December 31, 2009. Income allocated to other noncontrolling interests represents the losses allocated to partners in consolidated joint ventures on eight properties that were

in lease-up during 2009. The loss allocated to the other noncontrolling interests was higher than the prior year as there were only four consolidated joint venture properties in lease-up for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2008 to the Year Ended December 31, 2007

Results for the year ended December 31, 2008 included the operations of 627 properties (283 of which were consolidated and 344 of which were in joint ventures accounted for using the equity method) compared to the results for the year ended December 31, 2007, which included operations of 606 properties (262 of which were consolidated and 344 of which were in joint ventures accounted for using the equity method). Results for both periods also included equity in earnings of real estate ventures, third-party management and franchise fees, tenant reinsurance, and other income.

The following table sets forth information on revenues earned for the years indicated:

Property Rental—The increase in property rental revenues consists of $24,437 associated with acquisitions completed in 2008 and 2007, $2,782 associated with rental rate increases at stabilized properties and $2,161 from increases in occupancy and rental rates at lease-up properties.

Management and Franchise Fees—Our taxable REIT subsidiary, Extra Space Management, Inc., manages properties owned by our joint ventures, franchisees and third parties. Management fees generally represent 6.0% of cash collected from properties owned by third party, franchisees and unconsolidated joint ventures. Revenues from management and franchise fees have remained fairly stable compared to the previous year. Increased revenues at our joint venture, franchise, and third-party managed sites related to rental rate and occupancy increases have been partially offset by lost management fees due to the termination of certain management agreements mainly due to the acquisition of the managed properties.

Tenant Reinsurance—The increase in tenant reinsurance revenues is due to the fact that during the year ended December 31, 2008, we promoted the tenant reinsurance program and successfully increased overall customer participation to approximately 47% at December 31, 2008 compared to approximately 34% at December 31, 2007.

Other Income—The decrease in other income is primarily due a decrease in development fee revenues earned because of a decrease in the volume of development relating to joint ventures in 2008 compared to 2007.

Property Operations—The increase in property operations expense in 2008 was primarily due to increases of $9,146 associated with acquisitions completed in 2008 and 2007. There were also increases in expenses of $2,306 at existing properties primarily due to increases in repairs and maintenance, utilities and property taxes.

Tenant Reinsurance—The increase in tenant reinsurance expense is due to the increase in tenant reinsurance revenues during 2008. A large portion of tenant reinsurance expense is variable and increases as tenant reinsurance revenues increase. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we continued to promote the tenant reinsurance program and successfully increased overall customer participation to approximately 47% at December 31, 2008 compared to approximately 34% at December 31, 2007.

Unrecovered Development and Acquisition Costs—The unrecovered development and acquisition costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2008 include $1,257 relating to due diligence costs that were part of an unsuccessful attempt by us to purchase a large portfolio of properties during the second quarter of 2008. The remainder of these costs in 2008 and the costs in 2007 relate to entitlement and other due diligence work done on development projects that we elected not to pursue.

General and Administrative—The increase in general and administrative expenses was due to the increased costs associated with the management of the additional properties that have been added through acquisitions and development in 2008 and 2007.

The following table sets forth information on other revenue and expenses for the years indicated:

			For the Year Ended December 31,

			2008			2007			$ Change			% Change
Other revenue and expenses:
	Interest expense		$	(64,611	)	$	(61,015	)	$	(3,596	)		5.9	%
	Non-cash interest expense related to amortization of discount on exchangeable senior notes			(4,060	)		(3,030	)		(1,030	)		34.0	%
	Interest income			3,399			7,925			(4,526	)		(57.1	)%
	Interest income on note receivable from Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder			4,850			2,492			2,358			94.6	%
	Gain on repurchase of exchangeable senior notes			6,311			—			6,311			—
	Loss on sale of investments available for sale			(1,415	)		—			(1,415	)		—
	Impairment of investments available for sale			—			(1,233	)		1,233			(100.0	)%
	Fair value adjustment of obligation associated with Preferred Operating Partnership units			—			1,054			(1,054	)		(100.0	)%
	Equity in earnings of real estate ventures			6,932			5,300			1,632			30.8	%
	Income tax expense			(519	)		—			(519	)		—

		Total other revenue (expense)	$	(49,113	)	$	(48,507	)	$	(606	)		0.2	%

Interest Expense—The increase in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2008 was due primarily to $3,191 associated with mortgage loans on acquisitions completed in 2007. The increase was partially offset by lower interest costs on existing property debt. Capitalized interest during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $5,506 and $4,555, respectively.

Non-cash Interest Expense Related to Amortization of Discount on Exchangeable Senior Notes—The increase in non-cash interest expense related to amortization of discount on exchangeable senior notes for the year ended December 31, 2008 when compared to the prior year was due to a full year of discount amortization being recorded in 2008 compared to only a partial year of discount amortization in 2007 as the exchangeable senior notes were issued on March 27, 2007.

Interest Income—Interest income earned in 2008 was primarily due to interest on the net proceeds from the sales of common stock in May and October 2008. Interest income earned in 2007 was mainly the result of the interest earned on the net proceeds received from the $250,000 exchangeable senior notes issued in March 2007 and on the remaining net proceeds from the sale of common stock in September 2006. Invested cash decreased steadily throughout 2007 as the funds were used for operations, acquisitions and development.

Interest Income on note receivable from Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder —Represents interest on a $100,000 loan to the holder of the Preferred OP units of our Operating Partnership (the "Preferred OP units"). The funds were loaned on June 25, 2007 and bear interest at an annual rate of 4.85%, payable quarterly.

Gain on Repurchase of Exchangeable Senior Notes—Represents the gain on the repurchase of $40,337 principal amount of the Operating Partnership's exchangeable senior notes. We paid cash of $31,721 to repurchase the notes, wrote off debt issuance costs of $646 and adjusted the discount on exchangeable senior notes to fair value by $1,659 for a net gain of $6,311. There were no repurchases of exchangeable senior notes during the year ended December 31, 2007.

Loss on Sale of Investments Available for Sale—Represents the amount of loss recorded on February 29, 2008 related to the liquidation of auction rate securities held in investments for sale.

Impairment of Investments Available for Sale—As of December 31, 2007, we had a $24,460 par value investment in ARS. Due to the uncertainty in the credit markets, the auctions related to the ARS we held failed causing the liquidity and the fair value of these investments to be impaired. As a result, we recorded a $1,233 other-than-temporary impairment charge and a $1,415 temporary impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of the ARS to an estimated fair value of $21,812.

Fair Value Adjustment of Obligation Associated with Preferred Operating Partnership Units —This amount is a one-time adjustment that represents the change in fair value of the embedded derivative associated with the Preferred OP units issued in connection with the AAAAA Rent-a-Space acquisition between the original issuance of the Preferred OP units (June and August, 2007) and the completion of the amendment to the agreement that was signed on September 28, 2007.

Equity in Earnings of Real Estate Ventures—The change in equity in earnings of real estate ventures for the year ended December 31, 2008 primarily relates to an increase of $1,098 from our purchase of an additional 40% interest in the VRS Self Storage LLC joint venture on July 1, 2008. The remainder of the change is a result of an increase in income at the properties owned by the real estate ventures. The increases were partially offset by the losses on certain lease-up properties held in joint ventures.

Income Tax Expense—The increase in income tax expense relates primarily to our net operating loss carryforward being used completely during 2008.

The following table sets forth information on net income allocated to noncontrolling interests for the years indicated:

Net Income Allocated to Preferred Operating Partnership Noncontrolling Interests —Income allocated to the Preferred Operating Partnership equals the fixed distribution paid to the Preferred OP unit holder plus approximately 1.1% of the remaining net income allocated after the adjustment for the fixed distribution paid for the year ended December 31, 2008. The amount allocated to noncontrolling interest was higher in 2008 than in 2007 as the Preferred OP units were issued in June and August 2007.

Net Income Allocated to Operating Partnership and Other Noncontrolling Interests —Income allocated to the Operating Partnership represents approximately 4.7% of net income after the allocation of the fixed distribution paid to the Preferred OP unit holder. The decrease in the amount allocated to the noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership was due to a full year of fixed

distribution being paid to the Preferred Operating Partnership in 2008. Income allocated to other noncontrolling interests represents the losses allocated to partners in consolidated joint ventures on four properties that were in lease-up during 2008. The amount allocated to the other noncontrolling interests was higher than the prior year as there were only two consolidated joint venture properties in lease-up for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Fixed Distribution Paid to Preferred Operating Partnership Unit Holder—The amount for the year ended December 31, 2007 represents the fixed distributions that were paid to the Preferred OP unit holder between the original issuance of the Preferred OP units and the completion of the amendment to the Operating Partnership Agreement that was signed on September 28, 2007.

FFO provides relevant and meaningful information about our operating performance that is necessary, along with net income and cash flows, for an understanding of our operating results. We believe FFO is a meaningful disclosure as a supplement to net earnings. Net earnings assume that the values of real estate assets diminish predictably over time as reflected through depreciation and amortization expenses. The values of real estate assets fluctuate due to market conditions and we believe FFO more accurately reflects the value of our real estate assets. FFO is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. ("NAREIT") as net income computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), excluding gains or losses on sales of operating properties, plus depreciation and amortization and after adjustments to record unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures on the same basis. We believe that to further understand our performance, FFO should be considered along with the reported net income and cash flows in accordance with GAAP, as presented in the consolidated financial statements.

The computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs or real estate companies that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to net cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity, or as an indicator of our ability to make cash distributions. The following table sets forth the calculation of FFO for the periods indicated (dollars are in thousands, except for share data):

We consider our same-store stabilized portfolio to consist of only those properties which were wholly-owned at the beginning and at the end of the applicable periods presented and that have achieved stabilization as of the first day of such period. The following table sets forth operating data for our same-store portfolio (revenues include tenant reinsurance income). We consider the following same-store presentation to be meaningful in regards to the properties shown below. These results provide information relating to property-level operating changes without the effects of acquisitions and completed developments.

	For the Three Months ended December 31,									For the Year Ended December 31,									For the Year Ended December 31,

	For the Three Months ended December 31,						Percent Change			For the Year Ended December 31,						Percent Change			For the Year Ended December 31,						Percent Change
	2009			2008			Percent Change			2009			2008			Percent Change			2008			2007			Percent Change
Same-store rental and tenant reinsurance revenues	$	56,497		$	58,863			(4.0	)%	$	226,899		$	233,682			(2.9	)%	$	188,150		$	183,869			2.3	%
Same-store operating and tenant reinsurance expenses		19,752			19,391			1.9	%		80,009			80,142			(0.2	)%		63,606			63,428			0.3	%
Same-store net operating income		36,745			39,472			(6.9	)%		146,890			153,540			(4.3	)%		124,544			120,441			3.4	%
Non same-store rental and tenant reinsurance revenues		8,948			6,294			42.2	%		32,286			18,104			78.3	%		63,636			33,495			90.0	%
Non same-store operating and tenant reinsurance expenses		3,192			3,368			(5.2	)%		14,387			9,446			52.3	%		25,982			14,352			81.0	%
Total rental and tenant reinsurance revenues		65,445			65,157			0.4	%		259,185			251,786			2.9	%		251,786			217,364			15.8	%
Total operating and tenant reinsurance expenses		22,944			22,759			0.8	%		94,396			89,588			5.4	%		89,588			77,780			15.2	%
Same-store square foot occupancy as of quarter and year end		83.2	%		82.2	%					83.2	%		82.2	%					84.1	%		85.1	%
Properties included in same-store		252			252						252			252						210			210

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2009 to the Year Ended December 31, 2008

The decrease in same-store rental revenues was primarily due to lower rates to new customers and decreased average annual occupancy. These decreases were partially offset by rental rate increases to existing tenants.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2008 to the Year Ended December 31, 2007

The increase in same-store rental revenues was primarily due to increased rental rates to existing tenants which offset lower rental rates to new tenants and a slight reduction in occupancy due to increased move-out activity.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2009 to the Year Ended December 31, 2008

Cash flows provided by operating activities were $81,165 and $98,391 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. This decrease was due mainly to a decrease in net income and an increase in the cash paid to affiliated joint ventures and related parties during 2009 compared

to 2008 to repay receivables from related parties and affiliated real estate joint ventures. Additionally, more cash was spent to pay down accounts payable and accrued expenses in 2009 when compared to 2008.

Cash used in investing activities was $104,410 and $224,481 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in 2009 was primarily the result of $89,108 less cash being used to fund acquisition activities in 2009 compared to 2008 and a decrease of $46,815 in the amount of cash invested in real estate ventures in 2009 compared to 2008. These decreases were partially offset by the collection of $21,812 of cash from the sale of our investments available for sale in 2008, compared to $0 in 2009.

Cash provided by financing activities were $91,223 and $172,685 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in cash provided in 2009 when compared to the prior year was primarily the result of proceeds from issuance of common stock of $276,601 in 2008 compared to $0 in 2009. Additionally, we paid $56,013 more cash in 2009 to repurchase a portion of our exchangeable senior notes when compared to the prior year. These decreases were partially offset by a net increase of $206,609 in the net proceeds from notes payable and lines of credit in 2009 when compared to 2008, and $46,320 less cash paid for dividends in 2009.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2008 to the Year Ended December 31, 2007

Cash flows provided by operating activities were $98,391 and $102,096 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. This decrease was due mainly to an increase in the cash paid on behalf of affiliated joint ventures and related parties during 2008 compared to 2007, which resulted in an increase in receivables from related parties. Additionally, more cash was spent to acquire other assets in 2008 when compared to 2007. These decreases were partially offset by the increase in cash due to the acquisition of new stabilized properties in 2008 and 2007.

Cash used in investing activities was $224,481 and $254,344 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in 2008 was primarily the result of $56,397 less cash being used to fund acquisition activities and the collection of $21,812 of cash from the sale of our investments available for sale, compared to a payment of $24,460 to purchase investments available for sale in 2007. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $19,670 in development activities and an increase of $39,223 invested in real estate ventures when compared to the prior year.

Cash provided by financing activities was $172,685 and $98,824 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in cash provided in 2008 was due primarily to proceeds from issuance of common stock of $276,601 in 2008 compared to $0 in 2007, and no cash was loaned to the Preferred OP unit holder in 2008 when compared to the prior year. These increases were offset primarily by the decrease of $250,000 of proceeds from exchangeable senior notes, as no new notes were issued in 2008.

Our 2009 property operations were challenging with decreases in same-store average annual occupancy, revenues and net operating income. On a same-store basis (including tenant reinsurance revenues), revenue and net operating income decreased 2.9% and 4.3%, respectively. Same-store expense control was excellent, with a year-on-year decrease of a 0.2%. The decrease in same-store rental revenues was primarily due to decreased average annual occupancy and lower rates to new customers. These decreases were partially offset by rental rate increases to existing tenants.

Properties located in the markets of Chicago, Indianapolis, New York City/Northern New Jersey, San Francisco/San Jose, and Washington DC were the top performers when comparing year on year

revenue. Markets performing below the portfolio average in year-on-year revenue included Atlanta, Memphis, Miami, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Tampa, and West Palm Beach.

As of December 31, 2009, we had $131,950 available in cash and cash equivalents. We intend to use this cash to repay debt scheduled to mature in 2010 and 2011 and for general corporate purposes. We are required to distribute at least 90% of our net taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to our stockholders on an annual basis to maintain our qualification as a REIT. Recently issued guidance from the IRS allowed for up to 90% of a REIT's dividends to be paid with its common stock through 2011 if certain conditions were met. It is unlikely that we will have any substantial cash balances that could be used to meet our liquidity needs. Instead, these needs must be met from cash generated from operations and external sources of capital.

Our cash and cash equivalents are held in accounts managed by third party financial institutions and consist of invested cash and cash in our operating accounts. During 2009 we experienced no loss or lack of access to our cash or cash equivalents; however, there can be no assurance that access to our cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets.

On February 13, 2009, we entered into a $50,000 Secondary Credit Line that is collateralized by mortgages on certain real estate assets and matures February 13, 2012. We intend to use the proceeds from the Secondary Credit Line to repay debt and for general corporate purposes. The Secondary Credit Line has an interest rate of LIBOR plus 325 basis points (3.5% at December 31, 2009). As of December 31, 2009, there were no amounts drawn on the Secondary Credit Line. We are subject to certain restrictive covenants relating to the Secondary Credit Line. We were in compliance with all financial covenants as of December 31, 2009.

On October 19, 2007, we entered into a $100,000 Credit Line. Outstanding balances on the Credit Line at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $100,000 and $27,000, respectively. We intend to use the proceeds of the Credit Line to repay debt and for general corporate purposes. The Credit Line has an interest rate of between 100 and 205 basis points over LIBOR, depending on certain of our financial ratios (1.2% at December 31, 2009). The Credit Line is collateralized by mortgages on certain real estate assets. The Credit Line matures on October 31, 2010 with two one-year extensions available. We are not subject to any financial covenants relating to the Credit Line.

As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately $1,406,846 of debt, resulting in a debt to total capitalization ratio of 57.1%. As of December 31, 2009, the ratio of total fixed rate debt and other instruments to total debt was 78.4% (including $107,145 on which we have interest rate swaps that have been included as fixed-rate debt). The weighted average interest rate of the total of fixed and variable rate debt at December 31, 2009 was 5.1%. Certain of our real estate assets are pledged as collateral for our debt. We are subject to certain restrictive covenants relating to our outstanding debt. We were in compliance with all financial covenants at December 31, 2009.

We expect to fund our short-term liquidity requirements, including operating expenses, recurring capital expenditures, dividends to stockholders, distributions to holders of OP units and interest on our outstanding indebtedness out of our operating cash flow, cash on hand and borrowings under our Credit Lines. In addition, we are actively pursuing additional term loans secured by unencumbered properties.

Our liquidity needs consist primarily of cash distributions to stockholders, facility development and improvements, property acquisitions, principal payments under our borrowings and non-recurring capital expenditures. In addition, we evaluate, on an ongoing basis, the merits of strategic acquisitions and other relationships, which may require us to raise additional funds. We do not expect that our operating cash flow will be sufficient to fund our liquidity needs and instead expect to fund such needs

out of additional borrowings of secured or unsecured indebtedness, joint ventures with third parties, and from the proceeds of public and private offerings of equity and debt. Additional capital may not be available on terms favorable to us or at all. Any additional issuance of equity or equity-linked securities may result in dilution to our stockholders. In addition, any new securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to holders of our common stock. We may also use OP units as currency to fund acquisitions from self-storage owners who desire tax-deferral in their exiting transactions.

The U.S. credit markets are experiencing significant dislocations and liquidity disruptions which have caused the spreads on prospective debt financings to widen considerably. These circumstances have materially impacted liquidity in the debt markets, making financing terms for borrowers less attractive, and in certain cases have resulted in the unavailability of certain types of debt financing. Continued uncertainty in the credit markets may negatively impact our ability to make acquisitions and fund current development projects. In addition, the financial condition of the lenders of our credit facilities may worsen to the point that they default on their obligations to make available to us the funds under those facilities. A prolonged downturn in the credit markets may cause us to seek alternative sources of potentially less attractive financing, and may require us to adjust our business plan accordingly. In addition, these factors may make it more difficult for us to sell properties or may adversely affect the price we receive for properties that we do sell, as prospective buyers may experience increased costs of debt financing or difficulties in obtaining debt financing. These events in the credit markets have also had an adverse affect on other financial markets in the United States, which may make it more difficult or costly for us to raise capital through the issuance of common stock, preferred stock or other equity securities. These disruptions in the financial market may have other adverse effects on us or the economy generally, which could cause our stock price to decline.

Except as disclosed in the notes to our financial statements, we do not currently have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purposes entities, which typically are established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Further, except as disclosed in the notes to our financial statements, we have not guaranteed any obligations of unconsolidated entities nor do we have any commitments or intent to provide funding to any such entities. Accordingly, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in these relationships.

Our exchangeable senior notes provide for excess exchange value to be paid in shares of our common stock if our stock price exceeds a certain amount. See the notes to our financial statements for a further description of our exchangeable senior notes.

The following table sets forth information on payments due by period at December 31, 2009:

As of December 31, 2009, the weighted average interest rate for all fixed rate loans was 5.6%, and the weighted average interest rate on all variable rate loans was 3.3%.

We will continue to employ leverage in our capital structure in amounts reviewed from time to time by our board of directors. Although our board of directors has not adopted a policy which limits the total amount of indebtedness that we may incur, we will consider a number of factors in evaluating our level of indebtedness from time to time, as well as the amount of such indebtedness that will be either fixed or variable rate. In making financing decisions, we will consider factors including but not limited to:

Our indebtedness may be recourse, non-recourse or cross-collateralized. If the indebtedness is non-recourse, the collateral will be limited to the particular properties to which the indebtedness relates. In addition, we may invest in properties subject to existing loans collateralized by mortgages or similar liens on our properties, or may refinance properties acquired on a leveraged basis. We may use the proceeds from any borrowings to refinance existing indebtedness, to refinance investments,

including the redevelopment of existing properties, for general working capital or to purchase additional interests in partnerships or joint ventures or for other purposes when we believe it is advisable.

During 2008 and 2009, we repurchased $162,337 million in aggregate principal amount of our exchangeable senior notes on the open market for $119,455 in cash. We may from time to time seek to retire, repurchase or redeem our additional outstanding debt including our exchangeable senior notes as well as shares of common stock or other securities in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or redemptions, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

The self-storage business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. A greater portion of revenues and profits are realized from May through September. Historically, our highest level of occupancy has been at the end of July, while our lowest level of occupancy has been in late February and early March. Results for any quarter may not be indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full fiscal year.

Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Our future income, cash flows and fair values of financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market interest rates.

Interest rate risk is highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors beyond our control.

As of December 31, 2009, we had $1.4 billion in total debt, of which $304.1 million was subject to variable interest rates (excluding debt with interest rate swaps). If LIBOR were to increase or decrease by 100 basis points, the increase or decrease in interest expense on the variable rate debt would increase or decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $3.0 million annually.

Interest rate risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our financial instruments. These analyses do not consider the effect of any change in overall economic activity that could occur. Further, in the event of a change of that magnitude, we may take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, these analyses assume no changes in our financial structure.

EXTRA SPACE STORAGE INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND SCHEDULES

All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is not present or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Extra Space Storage Inc. and subsidiaries ("the Company") as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 8. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statement taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, effective January 1, 2009, Extra Space Storage retroactively adopted the requirements of Statement of Position No. APB 14-1, "Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement" (ASC 470-20-65), Statement No. 160 "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—An Amendment of ARB No. 51" (ASC 810-10-65), and FASB Staff Position EITF 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities" (ASC 260-10) for all periods presented.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Extra Space Storage Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

				December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008

							(As revised—Note 2)
Assets:
Real estate assets:
	Net operating real estate assets			$	2,015,432		$	1,938,922
	Real estate under development				34,427			58,734

		Net real estate assets			2,049,859			1,997,656
Investments in real estate ventures					130,449			136,791
Cash and cash equivalents					131,950			63,972
Restricted cash					39,208			38,678
Receivables from related parties and affiliated real estate joint ventures					5,114			11,335
Other assets, net					50,976			42,576

			Total assets	$	2,407,556		$	2,291,008

Liabilities, Noncontrolling Interests and Equity:
Notes payable				$	1,099,593		$	943,598
Notes payable to trusts					119,590			119,590
Exchangeable senior notes					87,663			209,663
Discount on exchangeable senior notes					(3,869	)		(13,031	)
Lines of credit					100,000			27,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses					33,386			35,128
Other liabilities					24,974			22,267

			Total liabilities		1,461,337			1,344,215

Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
	Extra Space Storage Inc. stockholders' equity:
	Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding				—			—
	Common stock, $0.01 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 86,721,841 and 85,790,331 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively				867			858
	Paid-in capital				1,138,243			1,130,964
	Accumulated other comprehensive deficit				(1,056	)		—
	Accumulated deficit				(253,875	)		(253,052	)

		Total Extra Space Storage Inc. stockholders' equity			884,179			878,770
	Noncontrolling interest represented by Preferred Operating Partnership units, net of $100,000 note receivable				29,886			29,837
	Noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership				31,381			36,628
	Other noncontrolling interests				773			1,558

			Total noncontrolling interests and equity		946,219			946,793

			Total liabilities, noncontrolling interests and equity	$	2,407,556		$	2,291,008

Extra Space Storage Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

			For the Year Ended December 31,

			2009			2008			2007
						(As revised—Note 2)			(As revised—Note 2)
Revenues:
	Property rental		$	238,256		$	235,695		$	206,315
	Management and franchise fees			20,961			20,945			20,598
	Tenant reinsurance			20,929			16,091			11,049
	Other income			330			520			904

		Total revenues		280,476			273,251			238,866

Expenses:
	Property operations			88,935			84,522			73,070
	Tenant reinsurance			5,461			5,066			4,710
	Unrecovered development and acquisition costs			19,011			1,727			765
	Severance costs			2,225			—			—
	General and administrative			40,554			39,908			36,722
	Depreciation and amortization			52,403			49,566			39,801

		Total expenses		208,589			180,789			155,068

Income from operations				71,887			92,462			83,798
Interest expense				(67,579	)		(64,611	)		(61,015	)
Non-cash interest expense related to amortization of discount on exchangeable senior notes				(2,239	)		(4,060	)		(3,030	)
Interest income				1,582			3,399			7,925
Interest income on note receivable from Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder				4,850			4,850			2,492
Gain on repurchase of exchangeable senior notes				27,928			6,311			—
Loss on sale of investments available for sale				—			(1,415	)		—
Impairment of investments available for sale				—			—			(1,233	)
Fair value adjustment of obligation associated with Preferred Operating Partnership units				—			—			1,054

Income before equity in earnings of real estate ventures and income tax expense				36,429			36,936			29,991
Equity in earnings of real estate ventures				6,964			6,932			5,300
Income tax expense				(4,300	)		(519	)		—

Net income				39,093			43,349			35,291
Net income allocated to Preferred Operating Partnership noncontrolling interests				(6,186	)		(6,269	)		(1,730	)
Net income allocated to Operating Partnership and other noncontrolling interests				(930	)		(1,299	)		(1,832	)
Fixed distribution paid to Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder				—			—			(1,510	)

Net income attributable to common stockholders			$	31,977		$	35,781		$	30,219

Net income per common share
	Basic		$	0.37		$	0.46		$	0.47
	Diluted		$	0.37		$	0.46		$	0.46
Weighted average number of shares
	Basic			86,343,029			76,996,754			64,900,713
	Diluted			91,082,834			82,352,988			70,715,640
Cash dividends paid per common share			$	0.38		$	1.00		$	0.93

Extra Space Storage Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

	Noncontrolling Interests									Extra Space Storage Inc. Stockholders' Equity

	Preferred OP			OP			Other			Shares			Par Value		Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Deficit			Accumulated Deficit			Total Equity
Balances at December 31, 2006	$	—		$	34,841		$	317			64,167,098		$	642	$	822,181		$	—		$	(179,268	)	$	678,713
Issuance of common stock upon the exercise of options		—			—			—			126,801			1		1,720			—			—			1,721
Restricted stock grants issued		—			—			—			120,729			1		—			—			—			1
Restricted stock grants cancelled		—			—			—			(3,082	)		—		—			—			—			—
Compensation expense related to stock-based awards		—			—			—			—			—		2,125			—			—			2,125
Conversion of Contingent Conversion shares to common stock		—			—			—			1,372,728			14		—			—			—			14
Consolidation of noncontrolling interest—other		—			—			(230	)		—			—		—			—			—			(230	)
New Operating Partnership units issued		—			3,834			—			—			—		—			—			—			3,834
Conversion of Operating Partnership units for cash		—			(873	)		—			—			—		—			—			—			(873	)
New Preferred Operating Partnership units issued		131,499			—			—			—			—		—			—			—			131,499
Loan to Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder		(100,000	)		—			—			—			—		—			—			—			(100,000	)
Fair value adjustment of Preferred Operating Partnership units		(1,054	)		—			—			—			—		—			—			—			(1,054	)
Fixed distribution paid to Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder		—			—			—			—			—		—			—			(1,510	)		(1,510	)
Equity portion of exchangeable senior notes		—			—			—			—			—		22,804			—			—			22,804
Comprehensive income:
Net income (loss)		1,730			2,113			(281	)		—			—		—			—			31,729			35,291
Loss on sale of investments available for sale		(20	)		(81	)		—			—			—		—			(1,314	)		—			(1,415	)

Total comprehensive income																									33,876
Distributions to Operating Partnership units held by noncontrolling interests		(1,868	)		(3,710	)		—			—			—		—			—			—			(5,578	)
Dividends paid on common stock at $0.93 per share		—			—			—			—			—		—			—			(60,664	)		(60,664	)

Balances at December 31, 2007 (As revised—Note 2)	$	30,287		$	36,124		$	(194	)		65,784,274		$	658	$	848,830		$	(1,314	)	$	(209,713	)	$	704,678
Issuance of common stock upon the exercise of options		—			—			—			146,795			1		1,903			—			—			1,904
Restricted stock grants issued		—			—			—			361,624			4		—			—			—			4
Restricted stock grants cancelled		—			—			—			(10,186	)		—		—			—			—			—
Compensation expense related to stock-based awards		—			—			—			—			—		3,500			—			—			3,500
Conversion of Contingent Conversion shares to common stock		—			—			—			1,428,325			14		—			—			—			14
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs		—			—			—			17,950,000			180		276,421			—			—			276,601
New Operating Partnership units issued		—			3,621			—			—			—		—			—			—			3,621
Investments from noncontrolling interest—other		—			—			2,628			—			—		—			—			—			2,628
Repurchase of equity portion of exchangeable senior notes		—			—			—			—			—		(1,025	)		—			—			(1,025	)
Conversion of Operating Partnership units to common stock		—			(1,239	)		—			129,499			1		1,238			—			—			—
Comprehensive income:
Net income (loss)		6,269			2,175			(876	)		—			—		—			—			35,781			43,349
Loss on sale of investments available for sale		20			81			—			—			—		—			1,314			—			1,415

Total comprehensive income																									44,764
Tax effect from exercise of common stock options		—			—			—			—			—		97			—			—			97
Distributions to Operating Partnership units held by noncontrolling interests		(6,739	)		(4,134	)		—			—			—		—			—			—			(10,873	)
Dividends paid on common stock at $1.00 per share		—			—			—			—			—		—			—			(79,120	)		(79,120	)

Balances at December 31, 2008 (As revised—Note 2)	$	29,837		$	36,628		$	1,558			85,790,331		$	858	$	1,130,964		$	—		$	(253,052	)	$	946,793
Restricted stock grants issued		—			—			—			547,265			5		—			—			—			5
Restricted stock grants cancelled		—			—			—			(21,256	)		—		—			—			—			—
Compensation expense related to stock-based awards		—			—			—			—			—		3,809			—			—			3,809
Noncontrolling interest consolidated as business acquisition		—			—			726			—			—		—			—			—			726
Investments from other noncontrolling interests		—			—			(615	)		—			—		—			—			—			(615	)
Repurchase of equity portion of exchangeable senior notes		—			—			—			—			—		(2,234	)		—			—			(2,234	)
Conversion of Operating Partnership units to common stock		—			(3,583	)		—			405,501			4		3,579			—			—			—
Conversion of Operating Partnership units for cash		—			(1,908	)		—			—			—		—			—			—			(1,908	)
Comprehensive income:
Net income (loss)		6,186			1,826			(896	)		—			—		—			—			31,977			39,093
Change in fair value of interest rate swap		(11	)		(44	)		—			—			—		—			(1,056	)		—			(1,111	)

Total comprehensive income																									37,982
Tax effect from vesting of restricted stock grants		—			—			—			—			—		(414	)		—			—			(414	)
Tax effect from wind down of development program		—			—			—			—			—		2,539			—			—			2,539
Distributions to Operating Partnership units held by noncontrolling interests		(6,126	)		(1,538	)		—			—			—		—			—			—			(7,664	)
Dividends paid on common stock at $0.38 per share		—			—			—			—			—		—			—			(32,800	)		(32,800	)

Balances at December 31, 2009	$	29,886		$	31,381		$	773			86,721,841		$	867	$	1,138,243		$	(1,056	)	$	(253,875	)	$	946,219

Extra Space Storage Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Dollars in thousands)

				For the Year Ended December 31,

				2009			2008			2007
							(As revised—Note 2)			(As revised—Note 2)
Cash flows from operating activities:
	Net income			$	39,093		$	43,349		$	35,291
	Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
		Depreciation and amortization			52,403			49,566			39,801
		Amortization of deferred financing costs			3,877			3,596			3,309
		Non-cash interest expense related to amortization of discount on exchangeable senior notes			2,239			4,060			3,030
		Gain on repurchase of exchangeable senior notes			(27,928	)		(6,311	)		—
		Compensation expense related to stock-based awards			3,809			3,500			2,125
		Loss on investments available for sale			—			1,415			1,233
		Fair value adjustment of obligation associated with Preferred Operating Partnership units			—			—			(1,054	)
		Unrecovered development and acquisition costs			19,011			1,727			765
		Distributions from real estate ventures in excess of earnings			5,968			5,176			3,946
		Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
			Receivables from related parties and affiliated real estate joint ventures		(12,347	)		(5,976	)		5,905
			Other assets		(6,584	)		(9,164	)		4,588
			Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(1,675	)		3,435			5,642
			Other liabilities		3,299			4,018			(2,485	)

		Net cash provided by operating activities			81,165			98,391			102,096

Cash flows from investing activities:
	Acquisition of real estate assets				(38,185	)		(127,293	)		(183,690	)
	Development and construction of real estate assets				(67,301	)		(66,071	)		(46,401	)
	Proceeds from sale of real estate assets				4,652			340			1,999
	Investments in real estate ventures				(3,246	)		(50,061	)		(10,838	)
	Return of investment in real estate ventures				1,315			2,915			284
	Net proceeds from sale of (purchase of) investments available for sale				—			21,812			(24,460	)
	Change in restricted cash				(497	)		(3,781	)		9,833
	Purchase of equipment and fixtures				(1,148	)		(2,342	)		(1,071	)

		Net cash used in investing activities			(104,410	)		(224,481	)		(254,344	)

			For the Year Ended December 31,

			2009			2008			2007
						(As revised—Note 2)			(As revised—Note 2)
Cash flows from financing activities:
	Proceeds from issuance of exchangeable senior notes			—			—			250,000
	Repurchase of exchangeable senior notes			(87,734	)		(31,721	)		—
	Proceeds from notes payable and lines of credit			442,560			42,302			56,759
	Principal payments on notes payable and lines of credit			(212,515	)		(26,575	)		(32,164	)
	Deferred financing costs			(8,716	)		(1,007	)		(8,867	)
	Loan to Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder			—			—			(100,000	)
	Investments from noncontrolling interests			—			1,174			—
	Redemption of Operating Partnership units held by noncontrolling interest			(1,908	)		—			(873	)
	Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net			—			276,601			—
	Net proceeds from exercise of stock options			—			1,904			1,721
	Dividends paid on common stock			(32,800	)		(79,120	)		(60,664	)
	Distributions to noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership			(7,664	)		(10,873	)		(7,088	)

		Net cash provided by financing activities		91,223			172,685			98,824

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents				67,978			46,595			(53,424	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period				63,972			17,377			70,801

Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period			$	131,950		$	63,972		$	17,377

Supplemental schedule of cash flow information
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized			$	64,175		$	62,831		$	55,132
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:
Acquisitions:
	Real estate assets		$	—		$	3,621		$	231,037
	Notes payable acquired			—			—			(95,202	)
	Preferred Operating Partnership units issued as consideration			—			—			(131,499	)
	Investment in real estate ventures			—			—			(502	)
	Operating Partnership units issued as consideration			—			(3,621	)		(3,834	)
Conversion of Operating Partnership units held by noncontrolling interests for common stock			$	3,583		$	1,239		$	—
Change in receivables from related parties and affiliated real estate joint ventures due to consolidation of joint venture properties			$	18,568		$	—		$	—
Temporary impairment of short-term investments			$	—		$	—		$	(1,415	)

Extra Space Storage Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

Extra Space Storage Inc. (the "Company") is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust ("REIT"), formed as a Maryland Corporation on April 30, 2004 to own, operate, manage, acquire, develop and redevelop self-storage facilities located throughout the United States. The Company continues the business of Extra Space Storage LLC and its subsidiaries (the "Predecessor"), which had engaged in the self-storage business since 1977. The Company's interest in its properties is held through its operating partnership, Extra Space Storage LP (the "Operating Partnership"), which was formed on May 5, 2004. The Company's primary assets are general partner and limited partner interests in the Operating Partnership. This structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT, or UPREIT. The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Internal Revenue Code"). To the extent the Company continues to qualify as a REIT, it will not be subject to tax, with certain limited exceptions, on the taxable income that is distributed to its stockholders.

The Company invests in self-storage facilities by acquiring or developing wholly-owned facilities or by acquiring an equity interest in real estate entities. At December 31, 2009, the Company had direct and indirect equity interests in 642 storage facilities located in 33 states, and Washington, D.C. In addition, the Company managed 124 properties for franchisees or third parties bringing the total number of properties which it owns and/or manages to 766.

The Company operates in three distinct segments: (1) property management, acquisition and development; (2) rental operations; and (3) tenant reinsurance. The Company's property management, acquisition and development activities include managing, acquiring, developing and selling self-storage facilities. On June 2, 2009, the Company announced the wind-down of its development activities. As of December 31, 2009, there were ten development projects in process that the Company expects to complete in 2010 and 2011. The rental operations activities include rental operations of self-storage facilities. No single tenant accounts for more than 5% of rental income. Tenant reinsurance activities include the reinsurance of risks relating to the loss of goods stored by tenants in the Company's self storage facilities.

The consolidated financial statements are presented on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly or majority owned subsidiaries and consolidated variable interest entities. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company accounts for arrangements that are not controlled through voting or similar rights as Variable Interest Entities ("VIE"). An enterprise is required to consolidate a VIE if it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. A VIE is created when (i) the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, or (ii) the entity's equity holders as a group either: (a) lack direct or indirect ability to make

decisions about the entity through voting or similar rights, (b) are not obligated to absorb expected losses of the entity if they occur, or (c) do not have the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity if they occur. If an entity is deemed to be a VIE, the enterprise that is deemed to absorb a majority of the expected losses or receive a majority of expected residual returns of the VIE is considered the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE.

The Company has concluded that under certain circumstances when the Company (1) enters into option agreements for the purchase of land or facilities from an entity and pays a non-refundable deposit, or (2) enters into arrangements for the formation of joint ventures, a VIE may be created under condition (i), (ii) (b) or (c) of the previous paragraph. For each VIE created, the Company has considered expected losses and residual returns based on the probability of future cash flows. If the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE, the assets, liabilities and operations of the VIE are consolidated with the Company's financial statements. Additionally, the Company's Operating Partnership has notes payable to three trusts that are VIEs under condition (ii) (a) above. Since the Operating Partnership is not the primary beneficiary of the trusts, these VIEs are not consolidated.

The Company's investments in real estate joint ventures, where the Company has significant influence, but not control, and joint ventures which are VIEs in which the Company is not the primary beneficiary, are recorded under the equity method of accounting on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revisions of Prior Period Numbers for Retroactive Adoption of Certain Accounting Standards

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted certain recently issued accounting standards that required the Company to retroactively adopt the presentation and disclosure requirements and to revise prior period financial statements as noted in "Recently Issued Accounting Standards" below. The Company also revised the amounts allocated to its noncontrolling interests in its Operating Partnership and calculated earnings per share accordingly.

Certain amounts in the 2008 and 2007 financial statements and supporting note disclosures have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Such reclassifications did not impact previously reported net income or accumulated deficit.

The following table provides information for each major category of assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

The Company did not have any significant assets or liabilities that are re-measured on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs for the year ended December 31, 2009. Following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the Company's investments available for sale, which were the Company's only material assets or liabilities that were re-measured on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended December 31, 2008:

Long lived assets held for use are evaluated by the Company for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. The Company reviews each self-storage facility at least annually to determine if any such events or circumstances have occurred or exist. The Company focuses on facilities where occupancy and/or rental income have decreased by a significant amount. For these facilities, the Company determines whether the decrease is temporary or permanent and whether the facility will likely recover the lost occupancy and/or revenue in the short term. In addition, the

Company carefully reviews facilities in the lease-up stage and compares actual operating results to original projections.

When the Company determines that an event that may indicate impairment has occurred, the Company compares the carrying value of the related long-lived assets to the undiscounted future net operating cash flows attributable to the assets. An impairment loss is recorded if the net carrying value of the asset exceeds the undiscounted future net operating cash flows attributable to the asset. The impairment loss recognized equals the excess of net carrying value over the related fair value of the asset.

When real estate assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Company discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the fair value of the assets, net of selling costs. If the estimated fair value, net of selling costs, of the assets that have been identified for sale is less than the net carrying value of the assets, then a valuation allowance is established. The operations of assets held for sale or sold during the period are generally presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

The Company assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Company's investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures may be impaired annually and when events or circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. An investment is impaired if management's estimate of the fair value of the investment is less than its carrying value. To the extent impairment has occurred, and is considered to be other than temporary using significant unobservable inputs, the loss is measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the fair value of the investment.

On June 2, 2009, the Company announced the wind-down of its development activities. As a result of this change, the Company reviewed its properties under construction, unimproved land and its investment in development joint ventures for potential impairments. This review included the preparation of updated models based on current market conditions, obtaining appraisals and reviewing recent sales and list prices of undeveloped land and mature self storage facilities. Based on this review, the Company identified certain assets as being impaired. The impairments relating to long-lived assets where the Company intends to complete the development and hold the asset are the result of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows being less than the current carrying value of the assets. The Company compared the carrying value of certain undeveloped land and seven vacant condominiums that the Company intends to sell to the fair market value of similar undeveloped land and condominiums. For the assets that the Company intends to sell, where the current estimated fair market value less costs to sell was below the carrying value, the Company reduced the carrying value of the asset to the current fair market value less selling costs and recorded an impairment charge. These assets are classified as held for sale. The impairments relating to investments in development joint ventures are the result of the Company comparing the estimated current fair market value to the carrying value of the investment. For those investments in development joint ventures where the current estimated fair market value was below the carrying value, the Company reduced the investment to the current fair market value through an impairment charge. Losses relating to changes in fair value have been included in unrecovered development and acquisition costs on the Company's Statements of Operations.

The following table provides information for each major category of assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, other financial instruments included in other assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses, variable rate notes payable, line of credit and other liabilities reflected in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2009 and 2008 approximate fair value. The fair values of the Company's notes receivable and fixed rate notes payable are as follows:

Real estate assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Direct and allowable internal costs associated with the development, construction, renovation, and improvement of real estate assets are capitalized. Interest, property taxes, and other costs associated with development incurred during the construction period are capitalized. Capitalized interest during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $4,148, $5,506 and $4,555, respectively.

In connection with the Company's acquisition of self-storage facilities, the purchase price is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their fair values, which are estimated using significant unobservable inputs. The value of the tangible assets, consisting of land and buildings, are determined as if vacant, that is, at replacement cost. Intangible assets, which represent the value of existing tenant relationships, are recorded at their fair values based on the avoided cost to replace the current leases. The Company measures the value of tenant relationships based on the amount of time required to replace existing customers which is based on the Company's historical experience with turnover in its facilities. Debt assumed as part of an acquisition is recorded at fair value based on current interest rates compared to contractual rates. Acquisition-related transaction costs incurred after December 31, 2008 have been expensed as incurred.

Intangible lease rights represent: (1) purchase price amounts allocated to leases on two properties that cannot be classified as ground or building leases; these rights are amortized to expense over the life of the leases and (2) intangibles related to ground leases on four properties where the leases were assumed by the Company at rates that were lower than the current market rates for similar leases. The value associated with these assumed leases were recorded as intangibles, which will be amortized over the lease terms.

The Company's investments in real estate joint ventures, where the Company has significant influence, but not control and joint ventures which are VIEs in which the Company is not the primary beneficiary, are recorded under the equity method of accounting in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Under the equity method, the Company's investment in real estate ventures is stated at cost and adjusted for the Company's share of net earnings or losses and reduced by distributions. Equity in earnings of real estate ventures is generally recognized based on the Company's ownership interest in the earnings of each of the unconsolidated real estate ventures. For the purposes of presentation in the statement of cash flows, the Company follows the "look through" approach for classification of distributions from joint ventures. Under this approach, distributions are reported under operating cash flow unless the facts and circumstances of a specific distribution clearly indicate that it is a return of capital (e.g., a liquidating dividend or distribution of the proceeds from the joint venture's sale of assets), in which case it is reported as an investing activity.

The Company's cash is deposited with financial institutions located throughout the United States of America and at times may exceed federally insured limits. The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with a maturity date of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Restricted cash is comprised of escrowed funds deposited with financial institutions located in various states relating to earnest money deposits on potential acquisitions, real estate taxes, insurance, capital expenditures and lease liabilities.

Other assets consist primarily of equipment and fixtures, deferred financing costs, customer accounts receivable, investments in trusts, other intangible assets, deferred tax assets and prepaid expenses. Depreciation of equipment and fixtures is computed on a straight-line basis over three to five years. Deferred financing costs are amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the terms of the respective debt agreements.

The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows or other types of forecasted transactions are considered cash flow hedges.

For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative and the hedged item related to the hedged risk are recognized in the statements of operations. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income, outside of earnings, and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings.

In the normal course of its on-going business operations, the Company encounters economic risk. There are three main components of economic risk: interest rate risk, credit risk and market risk. The Company is subject to interest rate risk on its interest-bearing liabilities. Credit risk is the risk of inability or unwillingness of tenants to make contractually required payments. Market risk is the risk of declines in the value of properties due to changes in rental rates, interest rates or other market factors affecting the value of properties held by the Company. The Company has entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage a portion of its interest rate risk.

Conversions of Operating Partnership units to common stock, when converted under the original provisions of the Operating Partnership agreement, are accounted for by reclassifying the underlying net book value of the units from noncontrolling interest to the Company's equity. The difference between the fair value of the consideration paid and the adjustment to the carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest is recognized as additional paid in capital for the Company.

Rental revenues are recognized as earned based upon amounts that are currently due from tenants. Leases are generally on month-to-month terms. Prepaid rents are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the leases. Promotional discounts are recognized as a reduction to rental income over the promotional period. Late charges, administrative fees, merchandise sales and truck rentals are recognized as income when earned. Management and franchise fee revenues are recognized monthly as services are performed and in accordance with the terms of the related management agreements. Tenant reinsurance premiums are recognized as revenue over the period of insurance coverage. Equity in earnings of real estate entities is recognized based on our ownership interest in the earnings of each of the unconsolidated real estate entities. Interest income is recognized as earned.

Property expenses, including utilities, property taxes, repairs and maintenance and other costs to manage the facilities are recognized as incurred. The Company accrues for property tax expense based upon invoice amounts, estimates and historical trends. If these estimates are incorrect, the timing of expense recognition could be affected.

In general, sales of real estate and related profits/losses are recognized when all consideration has changed hands and risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred. Certain types of continuing involvement preclude sale treatment and related profit recognition; other forms of continuing involvement allow for sale recognition but require deferral of profit recognition.

The Company incurs advertising costs primarily attributable to directory, direct mail, internet and other advertising. Direct response advertising costs are deferred and amortized over the expected benefit period determined to be 12 months. All other advertising costs are expensed as incurred. The Company recognized $5,892, $5,935 and $5,003 in advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

The Company has elected to be treated as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. In order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, among other things, the Company is required to distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders and meet certain tests regarding the nature of its income and assets. As a REIT, the Company is not subject to federal income tax with respect to that portion of its income which meets certain criteria and is distributed annually to stockholders. The Company plans to continue to operate so that it meets the requirements for taxation as a REIT. Many of these requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. If the Company were to fail to meet these requirements, it would be subject to federal income tax. The Company is subject to certain state and local taxes. Provision for such taxes has been included in income tax expense on the Company's consolidated statements of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2009, 0% (unaudited) of all distributions to stockholders qualifies as a return of capital.

The Company has elected to treat one of its corporate subsidiaries, Extra Space Management, Inc., as a taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS"). In general, the Company's TRS may perform additional services for tenants and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate related business (except for the operation or management of health care facilities or any lodging facilities or the provision to any person, under a franchise, license or otherwise, of rights to any brand name under which lodging facility or health care facility is operated). A TRS is subject to corporate federal income tax.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, there were no material unrecognized tax benefits. Interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions will be recognized in income tax expense when incurred. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had no interest or penalties related to uncertain tax provisions.

The measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards to employees and directors are based on estimated fair values. Awards granted are valued at fair value and any compensation element is recognized on a straight line basis over the service periods of each award.

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common shares outstanding including unvested share based payment awards that contain a non-forfeitable right to dividends or dividend equivalents. Diluted earnings per common share measures the performance of the Company over the reporting period while giving effect to all potential common shares that were dilutive and outstanding during the period. The denominator includes the weighted average number of basic shares and the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares that were dilutive had been issued and is calculated using either the treasury stock or if-converted method. Potential common shares are securities (such as options, warrants, convertible debt, Contingent Conversion Shares ("CCSs"), Contingent Conversion Units ("CCUs"), exchangeable Series A Participating Redeemable Preferred Operating Partnership units ("Preferred OP units") and exchangeable Operating Partnership units ("OP units")) that do not have a current right to participate in earnings but could do so in the future by virtue of their option or conversion right. In computing the dilutive effect of convertible securities, net income is adjusted to add back any changes in earnings in the period associated with the convertible security. The numerator also is adjusted for the effects of any other non-discretionary changes in income or loss that would result from the assumed conversion of those potential common shares. In computing diluted earnings per share, only potential common shares that are dilutive, those that reduce earnings per share, are included.

The Company's Operating Partnership has $87,663 of exchangeable senior notes issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2009 that also can potentially have a dilutive effect on its earnings per share calculations. The exchangeable senior notes are exchangeable by holders into shares of the

Company's common stock under certain circumstances per the terms of the indenture governing the exchangeable senior notes. The exchangeable senior notes are not exchangeable unless the price of the Company's common stock is greater than or equal to 130% of the applicable exchange price for a specified period during a quarter, or unless certain other events occur. The exchange price was $23.45 per share at December 31, 2009, and could change over time as described in the indenture. The price of the Company's common stock did not exceed 130% of the exchange price for the specified period of time during the fourth quarter of 2009; therefore holders of the exchangeable senior notes may not elect to convert them during the first quarter of 2010.

The Company has irrevocably agreed to pay only cash for the accreted principal amount of the exchangeable senior notes relative to its exchange obligations, but has retained the right to satisfy the exchange obligations in excess of the accreted principal amount in cash and/or common stock. Though the Company has retained that right, Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 260, formerly Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement No. 128, "Earnings Per Share ("FAS 128")," requires an assumption that shares will be used to pay the exchange obligations in excess of the accreted principal amount, and requires that those shares be included in the Company's calculation of weighted average common shares outstanding for the diluted earnings per share computation. No shares were included in the computation at December 31, 2009, 2008 or 2007 because there was no excess over the accreted principal for the period.

For the purposes of computing the diluted impact on earnings per share of the potential conversion of Preferred OP units into common shares, where the Company has the option to redeem in cash or shares and where the Company has stated the positive intent and ability to settle at least $115,000 of the instrument in cash (or net settle a portion of the Preferred OP units against the related outstanding note receivable), only the amount of the instrument in excess of $115,000 is considered in the calculation of shares contingently issuable for the purposes of computing diluted earnings per share as allowed by paragraph 29 of FAS 128 (ASC 260-10-45-46).

For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, options to purchase approximately 4,925,153 shares, 1,870,423 shares and 287,240 shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the computation of earnings per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. All restricted stock grants have been included in basic and diluted shares outstanding because such shares earn a non-forfeitable dividend and carry voting rights.

		For the Year Ended December 31,

		2009			2008			2007
Net income attributable to common stockholders		$	31,977		$	35,781		$	30,219
	Add: Income allocated to noncontrolling interest—Preferred Operating Partnership and Operating Partnership		8,012			8,444			3,843
	Subtract: Fixed component of income allocated to noncontrolling interest—Preferred Operating Partnership		(5,750	)		(5,751	)		(1,438	)

Net income for diluted computations		$	34,239		$	38,474		$	32,624

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
	Average number of common shares outstanding—basic		86,343,029			76,996,754			64,900,713
	Operating Partnership units		3,627,368			4,264,968			4,050,588
	Preferred Operating Partnership units		989,980			989,980			989,980
	Dilutive and cancelled stock options and CCS/CCU conversions		122,457			101,286			774,359

	Average number of common shares outstanding—diluted		91,082,834			82,352,988			70,715,640
Net income per common share
	Basic	$	0.37		$	0.46		$	0.47
	Diluted	$	0.37		$	0.46		$	0.46

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" (ASC 820), which defines fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurement. This guidance applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, and does not require any new fair value measurements. The Company adopted this guidance for financial assets and liabilities effective January 1, 2008 and for non-financial assets and liabilities effective January 1, 2009. In April 2009, the FASB issued the following updates that provide additional application guidance and enhance disclosures regarding fair value measurements and impairments of securities:

The Company adopted these updates effective June 30, 2009 and has applied the guidance to all periods presented.

In December 2007, the FASB issued revised Statement No. 141, "Business Combinations" ("FAS 141(R)") (ASC 805). This guidance establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures in its financial statements the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Generally, assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction are recorded at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. The guidance also changed the accounting treatment and disclosure for certain specific items in a business combination. The Company adopted this guidance for all acquisitions subsequent to January 1, 2009.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—An Amendment of ARB No. 51" (ASC 810-10-65) ("FAS 160"). This guidance establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It also requires a company to clearly identify and present ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the company in the consolidated financial statements within the equity section but separate from the company's equity. In addition, the guidance also requires the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of operations and requires changes in ownership interest to be accounted for similarly as equity transactions. If noncontrolling interests are determined to be redeemable, they are to be carried at the higher of (a) their carrying value or (b) their redeemable value as of the balance sheet date and reported as temporary equity. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2009, and has applied it to all periods presented.

In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (ASC 815). This guidance changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures stating how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for; and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity's financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The Company adopted this guidance effective

January 1, 2009 and expanded the disclosures relating to derivative instruments included in its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Position No. APB 14-1, "Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)" ("FSP APB 14-1") (ASC 470-20-65). Under this guidance, entities with convertible debt instruments that may be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion should separately account for the liability and equity components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer's economic interest cost. The effect of the adoption on the Company's exchangeable senior notes is that the equity component is included in the paid-in-capital section of stockholders' equity on the consolidated balance sheet and the value of the equity component is treated as original issue discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component. The original issue discount is amortized over the period of the debt as additional interest expense. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, with retrospective application required. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2009 and has applied it to all periods presented.

In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 142-3, "Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets" (ASC 350-30). This guidance amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used in determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. This new guidance applies prospectively to intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets in business combinations and asset acquisitions. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2008 and has been adopted by the Company for all acquisitions subsequent to January 1, 2009.

In June 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position EITF 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities," (ASC 260-10). This guidance provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method as described in FASB Statement No. 128, "Earnings per Share" (ASC 260). This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and the Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2009 and has applied it to all periods presented.

In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, "Subsequent Events" (ASC 855). This guidance is intended to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This guidance requires disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for selecting this date, that is, whether this date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. The Company adopted this guidance effective April 1, 2009.

On June 30, 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 168, "The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles—a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162" (ASC 105-10-05). The standard establishes the FASB Codification (the

"Codification") as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. The Codification is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company adopted the Codification effective September 30, 2009 and has included the references to the Codification, as appropriate, in these consolidated financial statements.

The Company amortizes to expense intangible assets—tenant relationships on a straight-line basis over the average period that a tenant is expected to utilize the facility (currently estimated at 18 months). The Company amortizes to expense the intangible lease rights over the terms of the related leases. Amortization related to the tenant relationships and lease rights was $1,905, $4,760 and $4,213 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The remaining balance of the unamortized lease rights will be amortized over the next 8 to 52 years.

On April 10, 2009, the Company sold vacant land in Los Angeles, California for cash of $4,652. A loss of $343 was recorded as a result of this sale, and is included in unrecovered development and acquisition costs in the consolidated statement of operations.

On June 19, 2008, the Company sold an undeveloped parcel of vacant land in Antelope, California for its book value of $340. There was no gain or loss recognized on the sale.

On August 3, 2007, the Company sold an undeveloped parcel of vacant land in Kendall, Florida for its book value of $1,999. There was no gain or loss recognized on the sale.

The following table shows the Company's acquisition of operating properties for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and does not include purchases of raw land or improvements made to existing assets:

				Consideration Paid											Acquisition Date Fair Value

Property Location	Number of Properties		Date of Acquisition	Total Paid		Cash Paid		Net Liabilities/ (Assets) Assumed			Value of OP Units Issued		Number of OP Units Issued		Land		Building		Intangible		Closing costs— expensed		Source of Acquisition
Georgia		1	11/12/2009	$	5,731	$	5,749	$	(18	)	$	—		—	$	1,958	$	3,625	$	108	$	40	Unrelated third party
Virginia		1	1/23/2009		7,425		7,438		(13	)		—		—		2,076		5,175		122		52	Unrelated franchisee
Colorado		1	11/25/2008		5,916		5,851		65			—		—		1,525		4,299		92		—	Unrelated third party
Indiana		1	10/31/2008		5,269		4,357		50			862		81,050		1,898		3,282		89		—	Unrelated third party
Indiana		4	10/10/2008		18,366		15,086		519			2,761		189,356		3,076		15,063		227		—	Unrelated third party
New York		2	10/2/2008		27,562		27,468		94			—		—		15,219		11,989		354		—	Unrelated third party
Maryland		1	9/17/2008		5,050		5,049		1			—		—		1,869		3,050		131		—	Unrelated third party
Florida		1	6/19/2008		10,394		10,317		77			—		—		3,638		6,590		166		—	Unrelated third party
California		1	5/2/2008		7,500		7,515		(15	)		—		—		2,994		4,506		—		—	Unrelated third party

Investments in real estate ventures at December 31, 2009 and 2008 consist of the following:

							Investment balance at

	Equity Ownership %			Excess Profit Participation %			December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008
Extra Space West One LLC ("ESW")		5	%		40	%	$	1,175	$	1,492
Extra Space West Two LLC ("ESW II")		5	%		40	%		4,749		4,874
Extra Space Northern Properties Six LLC ("ESNPS")		10	%		35	%		1,388		1,482
Extra Space of Santa Monica LLC ("ESSM")		48	%		43	%		2,419		3,225
Clarendon Storage Associates Limited Partnership ("Clarendon")		50	%		50	%		3,245		3,318
PRISA Self Storage LLC ("PRISA")		2	%		17	%		11,907		12,460
PRISA II Self Storage LLC ("PRISA II")		2	%		17	%		10,239		10,431
PRISA III Self Storage LLC ("PRISA III")		5	%		20	%		3,793		4,118
VRS Self Storage LLC ("VRS")		45	%		9	%		45,579		47,488
WCOT Self Storage LLC ("WCOT")		5	%		20	%		4,983		5,229
Storage Portfolio I LLC ("SP I")		25	%		40	%		16,049		17,471
Storage Portfolio Bravo II ("SPB II")		20	%		25 - 45	%		15,104		14,168
U-Storage de Mexico S.A. and related entities ("U-Storage")		35 - 40	%		35 - 40	%		6,166		9,205
Other minority owned properties		10 - 50	%		10 - 50	%		3,653		1,830

							$	130,449	$	136,791

In these joint ventures, the Company and the joint venture partner generally receive a preferred return on their invested capital. To the extent that cash/profits in excess of these preferred returns are

generated through operations or capital transactions, the Company would receive a higher percentage of the excess cash/profits than its equity interest.

On July 1, 2008, the Company purchased an additional 40.0% interest in VRS Self Storage LLC from Prudential Real Estate Investors for cash of $44,100, resulting in an increase in the Company's total interest in the joint venture from 5.0% to 45.0%.

Equity in earnings of real estate ventures for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 consists of the following:

Equity in earnings (losses) of ESW II, SP I and SPB II includes the amortization of the Company's excess purchase price of $25,713 of these equity investments over its original basis. The excess basis is amortized over 40 years.

Information (unaudited) related to the real estate ventures' debt at December 31, 2009 is set forth below:

Combined, condensed unaudited financial information of ESW, ESW II, ESNPS, PRISA, PRISA II, PRISA III, VRS, WCOT, SP I and SPB II as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, follows:

The Company has an interest in one unconsolidated joint venture with an unrelated third party ("Eastern Avenue") which is a variable interest entity. The Company holds a 10% equity interest in Eastern Avenue, but has 50% of the voting rights. Qualification as a VIE was based on the disproportionate voting and ownership percentages. The Company performed a probability-based cash flow analysis for this joint venture to determine which party was the primary beneficiary of the VIE. This analysis was performed using the Company's best estimates of the future cash flows based on its historical experience with numerous similar assets. As a result of this analysis, the Company determined that it was not the primary beneficiary of Eastern Avenue as the Company does not receive a majority of the venture's expected residual returns or bear a majority of the expected losses. Accordingly, this interest is accounted for using the equity method.

Eastern Avenue owns a single pre-stabilized self-storage property. This joint venture is financed through a combination of (1) equity contributions from the Company and its joint venture partners, (2) mortgage notes payable and (3) payables to the Company for working capital. The payables to the Company are generally amounts owed for expenses paid on behalf of the joint venture by the Company as manager. The Company performs management services for the Eastern Avenue joint venture in exchange for a management fee of approximately 6% of the gross rental revenues generated by the property. The Company's joint venture partner can replace the Company as manager of the property upon written notice. The Company has not provided financial or other support during the periods presented to Eastern Avenue that it was not previously contractually obligated to provide.

As of December 31, 2009, there was no amount related to Eastern Avenue included in Investments in Real Estate on its consolidated balance sheet. No liability was recorded associated with the Company's guarantee of the construction loan of Eastern Avenue. The Company's maximum exposure to loss for this venture as of December 31, 2009 is the total of the guaranteed loan balance, the payable to the Company and the Company's investment balances in the joint venture. The Company believes that the risk of incurring a loss as a result of having to perform on the guarantee is remote and therefore no liability has been recorded. Also, repossessing and/or selling the self-storage facility and land that collateralize the loan could provide funds sufficient to reimburse the Company. Additionally, the Company believes the payables to the Company are collectible.

The following table compares the liability balances and the maximum exposure to loss related to Eastern Avenue as of December 31, 2009:

The Company has variable interests in five consolidated joint ventures with third parties (the "VIE JVs") which are VIEs. The VIE JVs are financed through a combination of (1) equity contributions from the Company and its joint venture partners, (2) mortgage notes payable and (3) payables to the Company for working capital. The payables to the Company are generally amounts owed for expenses paid on behalf of the joint ventures by the Company as manager. The Company owns 10% to 72% of the common equity interests in the VIE JVs. The Company performed probability-based cash flow projections for each venture using the Company's best estimates of future revenues and expenses based on historical experience with numerous similar assets. According to these analyses, the joint ventures were determined to be VIEs based on an assessment that the equity financing was inadequate to support operations. The Company was also determined to be the primary beneficiary of each of the VIE JVs, as it receives the majority of the benefits and bears the majority of the expected losses of each as a result of its majority ownership and the management agreements. Therefore, each of the VIE JVs are consolidated with the assets and liabilities of each joint venture included in the Company's consolidated financial statements, with intercompany balances and transactions eliminated.

In July 2009, the Company purchased a lender's interest in a note payable to a joint venture that owns a single property located in Chicago, IL. The note was to Extra Space of Montrose, a joint venture in which the Company owns a 10% interest, and was guaranteed by the Company. This joint venture was considered a nonconsolidated VIE as of December 31, 2008. The Company considers the purchase of this loan to be a reconsideration event and has determined that the Company now bears the majority of the risk of loss for the joint venture. As a result of this loan purchase by the Company, the joint venture is now a consolidated VIE JV. The assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value upon consolidation.

In January 2009, the Company purchased a lender's interest in a construction loan to a joint venture that owns a single property located in Sacramento, CA. The construction loan was to ESS of Sacramento One LLC, a joint venture in which the Company owns a 50% interest, and was guaranteed by the Company. This joint venture was not consolidated and was not considered a VIE JV as of December 31, 2008. The Company considers the purchase of this loan to be a reconsideration event and has determined that the Company now bears a majority of the risk of loss for the joint venture. As a result of this loan purchase by the Company, the joint venture is now a consolidated VIE JV. The assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value upon consolidation.

The Company performs development services for ESS of Plantation LLC in exchange for a development fee of 1% of budgeted costs. The Company performs management services for Extra Space of Montrose Avenue, LLC, ESS of Sacramento One LLC, ES of Washington Avenue LLC and ES of Franklin Blvd LLC in exchange for a management fee of approximately 6% of cash collected by the properties.

The table below illustrates the financing of each of the VIE JVs as well as the carrying amounts of the related assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2009:

Except as disclosed above, the Company has not provided financial or other support during the periods presented to these VIEs that it was not previously contractually obligated to provide. The Company has guaranteed the notes payable for these VIEs with the exception of ESS of Plantation LLC and Extra Space of Montrose Avenue LLC, which have no note payable. If the joint ventures default on the loans, the Company may be forced to repay its portion of the balance owed. However, repossessing and/or selling the self-storage facilities and land that collateralize the loans could provide funds sufficient to reimburse the Company, and the Company believes that the risk of having to perform on the guarantees is remote.

The Company has accounted for securities classified as "available for sale" at fair value. Adjustments to the fair value of available for sale securities were recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. A decline in the market value of investment securities below cost, that was deemed to be other than temporary, resulted in a reduction in the carrying amount to fair value. The impairment was charged to earnings and a new cost basis for the security was established. The Company's investments available for sale have generally consisted of non mortgage-backed auction rate securities ("ARS"). ARS are generally long-term debt instruments that provide liquidity through a Dutch auction process that resets the applicable interest rate at pre-determined calendar intervals, generally every 28 days. This mechanism allows existing investors to rollover their holdings and continue to own their respective securities or liquidate their holdings by selling their securities at par.

At December 31, 2007, the Company had $24,460 invested in non mortgage- backed ARS. Uncertainties in the credit markets had prevented the Company and other investors from liquidating the holdings of auction rate securities in auctions for these securities because the amount of securities submitted for sale exceeded the amount of purchase orders. As a result, during the year ended

December 31, 2007, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $1,233 and a temporary impairment charge of $1,415, which reduced the carrying value of the Company's investments in ARS to an estimated fair value of $21,812 as of December 31, 2007. On February 29, 2008, the Company liquidated its holdings of ARS for $21,812 in cash. As a result of this settlement, the Company recognized $1,415 of the amount that was previously classified as a temporary impairment as a loss on sale of investments available for sale through earnings. The Company has not had investments in ARS since March 1, 2008.

The following table summarizes the scheduled maturities of notes payable at December 31, 2009:

Certain real estate assets are pledged as collateral for the notes payable. The Company is subject to certain restrictive covenants relating to the outstanding notes payable. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants at December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009 $410,930 of the Company's notes payable have been guaranteed by the Company.

GAAP requires the recognition of all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. A company must designate each qualifying hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge, or a hedge of a net investment in foreign operation.

The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary risk managed by using derivative instruments is interest rate risk. Interest rate swaps are entered into to manage interest rate risk associated with Company's fixed and variable-rate borrowings. The Company designates certain interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of variable-rate borrowings and the remainder as fair value hedges of fixed-rate borrowings.

The following table summarizes the terms of the Company's derivative financial instruments:

Monthly interest payments were recognized as an increase or decrease in interest expense as follows:

Information relating to the losses recognized on the swap agreements is as follows:

The Swap Agreements were highly effective for the year ended December 31, 2009. The gain (loss) reclassified from OCI in the preceding table represents the effective portion of our cash flow hedges reclassified from OCI to interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2009.

The balance sheet classification and carrying amounts of the interest rate swaps are as follows:

During July 2005, ESS Statutory Trust III (the "Trust III"), a newly formed Delaware statutory trust and a wholly-owned, unconsolidated subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, issued an aggregate of $40,000 of preferred securities which mature on July 31, 2035. In addition, the Trust III issued 1,238 of Trust common securities to the Operating Partnership for a purchase price of $1,238. On July 27, 2005, the proceeds from the sale of the preferred and common securities of $41,238 were loaned in the form of a note to the Operating Partnership ("Note 3"). Note 3 has a fixed rate of 6.91% through July 31, 2010, and then will be payable at a variable rate equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 2.40% per annum. The interest on Note 3, payable quarterly, will be used by the Trust III to pay dividends on the trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities may be redeemed by the Trust with no prepayment premium after July 27, 2010.

During May 2005, ESS Statutory Trust II (the "Trust II"), a newly formed Delaware statutory trust and a wholly-owned, unconsolidated subsidiary of the Operating Partnership of the Company, issued an aggregate of $41,000 of preferred securities which mature on June 30, 2035. In addition, the Trust II issued 1,269 of Trust common securities to the Operating Partnership for a purchase price of $1,269. On May 24, 2005, the proceeds from the sale of the preferred and common securities of $42,269 were loaned in the form of a note to the Operating Partnership ("Note 2"). Note 2 has a fixed rate of 6.67% through June 30, 2010, and then will be payable at a variable rate equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 2.40% per annum. The interest on Note 2, payable quarterly, will be used by the Trust II to pay dividends on the trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities may be redeemed by the Trust with no prepayment premium after June 30, 2010.

During April 2005, ESS Statutory Trust I (the "Trust"), a newly formed Delaware statutory trust and a wholly-owned, unconsolidated subsidiary of the Operating Partnership of the Company issued an aggregate of $35,000 of trust preferred securities which mature on June 30, 2035. In addition, the Trust issued 1,083 of Trust common securities to the Operating Partnership for a purchase price of $1,083. On April 8, 2005, the proceeds from the sale of the trust preferred and common securities of $36,083 were loaned in the form of a note to the Operating Partnership (the "Note"). The Note has a variable rate equal to the three-month LIBOR plus 2.25% per annum. The interest on the Note, payable quarterly, will be used by the Trust to pay dividends on the trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities may be redeemed by the Trust with no prepayment premium after June 30, 2010.

Trust, Trust II and Trust III are VIEs because the holders of the equity investment at risk (the trust preferred securities) do not have adequate decision making ability over the trusts' activities because of their lack of voting or similar rights. Because the Operating Partnership's investment in the trusts' common securities was financed directly by the trusts as a result of its loan of the proceeds to the Operating Partnership, that investment is not considered to be an equity investment at risk. The Operating Partnership's investment in the trusts is not a variable interest because equity interests are variable interests only to the extent that the investment is considered to be at risk, and therefore the Operating Partnership cannot be the primary beneficiary of the trusts. Since the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the trusts, they have not been consolidated. A debt obligation has been recorded in the form of notes as discussed above for the proceeds, which are owed to the Trust, Trust II, and Trust III by the Company. The Company has also recorded its investment in the trusts' common securities as other assets.

The Company has not provided financing or other support during the periods presented to the trusts that it was not previously contractually obligated to provide. The Company's maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with the trusts is equal to the total amount of the notes discussed above less the amounts of the Company's investments in the trusts' common securities. The net amount is the notes payable that the trusts owe to third parties for their investments in the trusts' preferred securities. Following is a tabular comparison of the carrying amounts of the liabilities the Company has

recorded as a result of its involvements with the trusts to the maximum exposure to loss the Company is subject to related to the trusts as of December 31, 2009:

As noted above, these differences represent the amounts that the Trusts would repay the Company for its investment in the trusts' common securities.

On March 27, 2007, the Company's Operating Partnership issued $250,000 of its 3.625% Exchangeable Senior Notes due April 1, 2027 (the "Notes"). Costs incurred to issue the Notes were approximately $5,700. These costs are being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over five years, which represents the estimated term of the Notes, and are included in other assets, net in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. The Notes are general unsecured senior obligations of the Operating Partnership and are fully guaranteed by the Company. Interest is payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year until the maturity date of April 1, 2027. The Notes bear interest at 3.625% per annum and contain an exchange settlement feature, which provides that the Notes may, under certain circumstances, be exchangeable for cash (up to the principal amount of the Notes) and, with respect to any excess exchange value, for cash, shares of the Company's common stock or a combination of cash and shares of the Company's common stock at an initial exchange rate of approximately 42.6491 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Notes at the option of the Operating Partnership.

The Operating Partnership may redeem the Notes at any time to preserve the Company's status as a REIT. In addition, on or after April 5, 2012, the Operating Partnership may redeem the Notes for cash, in whole or in part, at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, upon at least 30 days but not more than 60 days prior written notice to holders of the Notes.

The holders of the Notes have the right to require the Operating Partnership to repurchase the Notes for cash, in whole or in part, on each of April 1, 2012, April 1, 2017 and April 1, 2022, and upon the occurrence of a designated event, in each case for a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest. Certain events are considered "Events of Default," as defined in the indenture governing the Notes, which may result in the accelerated maturity of the Notes.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP APB 14-1 (ASC 470-20). Under this guidance, entities with convertible debt instruments that may be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion should separately account for the liability and equity components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer's economic interest cost. The Company retroactively adopted FSP APB 14-1 (ASC 470-20) effective January 1, 2009. As a result, the liability and equity components of the Notes are now accounted for separately. The equity component is included in paid-in-capital in stockholders' equity in the consolidated balance sheet, and the value of the equity component is treated as original issue discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component. The discount is being amortized over the period of the debt as additional interest expense.

Information about the carrying amounts of the equity component, the principal amount of the liability component, its unamortized discount, and its net carrying amount are as follows:

The remaining discount will be amortized over the remaining period of the debt through its first redemption date, April 1, 2012. The effective interest rate on the liability component is 5.75%. The amount of interest cost recognized relating to the contractual interest rate and the amortization of the discount on the liability component is as follows:

FSP APB 14-1 (ASC 470-20) requires that the value of the consideration paid to repurchase the Notes be allocated (1) to the extinguishment of the liability component and (2) to the reacquisition of the equity component. The amount allocated to the extinguishment of the liability component is equal to the fair value of that component immediately prior to extinguishment. The difference between the consideration attributed to the extinguishment of the liability component and the sum of (a) the net carrying amount of the repurchased liability component, and (b) the related unamortized debt issuance costs, is recognized as a gain on debt extinguishment. The remaining settlement consideration is

allocated to the reacquisition of the equity component of the repurchased Notes and recognized as a reduction of stockholders' equity.

On February 13, 2009, the Company entered into a $50,000 revolving secured line of credit (the "Secondary Credit Line") that is collateralized by mortgages on certain real estate assets and matures February 13, 2012. The Company intends to use the proceeds of the Secondary Credit Line to repay debt and for general corporate purposes. The Secondary Credit Line has an interest rate of LIBOR plus 325 basis points (3.5% at December 31, 2009). At December 31, 2009, there were no amounts drawn on the Secondary Credit Line. The Company is subject to certain covenants relating to the Secondary Credit Line. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants as of December 31, 2009.

On October 19, 2007, the Company entered into a $100,000 revolving line of credit (the "Credit Line") that matures October 31, 2010 with two one-year extensions available. $100,000 and $27,000 were drawn on the Credit Line at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company intends to use the proceeds of the Credit Line to repay debt and for general corporate purposes. The Credit Line has an interest rate of between 100 and 205 basis points over LIBOR, depending on certain financial ratios of the Company (1.2% at December 31, 2009). The Credit Line is collateralized by mortgages on certain real estate assets. As of December 31, 2009, the Credit Line had $100,000 of capacity based on the assets collateralizing the Credit Line. The Company is not subject to any financial covenants relating to the Credit Line.

The Company provides management and development services for certain affiliated real estate joint ventures, franchise, third parties, and other related party properties. Management agreements provide generally for management fees of 6% of gross rental revenues for the management of operations at the self-storage facilities.

Management fee revenues for related party and affiliated real estate joint ventures are summarized as follows:

		For the Year Ended December 31,

Entity	Type	2009		2008		2007
ESW	Affiliated real estate joint ventures	$	402	$	432	$	436
ESW II	Affiliated real estate joint ventures		312		310		232
ESNPS	Affiliated real estate joint ventures		452		466		444
ESSM	Affiliated real estate joint ventures		11		—		—
PRISA	Affiliated real estate joint ventures		4,793		5,076		5,132
PRISA II	Affiliated real estate joint ventures		3,989		4,147		4,184
PRISA III	Affiliated real estate joint ventures		1,686		1,774		1,862
VRS	Affiliated real estate joint ventures		1,128		1,175		1,151
WCOT	Affiliated real estate joint ventures		1,454		1,536		1,539
SP I	Affiliated real estate joint ventures		1,243		1,296		1,264
SPB II	Affiliated real estate joint ventures		943		1,003		1,026
Extra Space Development ("ESD")	Related party		—		—		743
Various	Franchisees, third parties and other		4,548		3,730		2,585

		$	20,961	$	20,945	$	20,598

14. RELATED PARTY AND AFFILIATED REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURE TRANSACTIONS (Continued)

Receivables from third parties, related parties and affiliated real estate joint ventures balances are summarized as follows:

Development fees receivable consist of amounts due for development services from third parties and unconsolidated affiliated joint ventures. The Company earns development fees of 1% - 6% of budgeted costs on development projects. Other receivables from properties consist of amounts due for management fees and expenses paid on behalf of the properties that the Company manages. The Company believes that all of these related party and affiliated real estate joint venture receivables are fully collectible. The Company does not have any payables to related parties at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

Centershift, a related party service provider, is partially owned by a certain director and certain members of management of the Company. Effective January 1, 2004, the Company entered into a license agreement with Centershift which secures a perpetual right for continued use of STORE (the site management software used at all sites operated by the Company) in all aspects of the Company's property acquisition, development, redevelopment and operational activities. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company paid Centershift $1,081, $989 and $965, respectively, relating to the purchase of software and to license agreements.

The Company has entered into an aircraft dry lease and service and management agreement with SpenAero, L.C. ("SpenAero") an affiliate of Spencer F. Kirk, the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company pays a defined hourly rate for use of the aircraft. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company paid SpenAero $631, $440 and $395, respectively. The services that the Company receives from SpenAero are similar in nature and price to those that are provided to other outside third parties.

15. NONCONTROLLING INTEREST REPRESENTED BY PREFERRED OPERATING PARTNERSHIP UNITS

On June 15, 2007, the Operating Partnership entered into a Contribution Agreement with various limited partnerships affiliated with AAAAA Rent-A-Space to acquire ten self-storage facilities (the "Properties") in exchange for the issuance of newly designated Preferred OP units of the Operating Partnership. The self-storage facilities are located in California and Hawaii.

On June 25 and 26, 2007, nine of the ten properties were contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for consideration totaling $137,800. Preferred OP units totaling 909,075, with a value of $121,700, were issued along with the assumption of approximately $14,200 of third-party debt, of which $11,400 was paid off at close. The final property was contributed on August 1, 2007 in exchange for

15. NONCONTROLLING INTEREST REPRESENTED BY PREFERRED OPERATING PARTNERSHIP UNITS (Continued)

consideration totaling $14,700. 80,905 Preferred OP units with a value of $9,800 were issued along with $4,900 of cash.

On June 25, 2007, the Company loaned the holder of the Preferred OP units $100,000. The note receivable bears interest at 4.85%, and is due September 1, 2017. The loan is secured by the borrower's Preferred OP units. The holder of the Preferred OP units can convert up to 114,500 Preferred OP units prior to the maturity date of the loan. If any redemption in excess of 114,500 Preferred OP units occurs prior to the maturity date, the holder of the Preferred OP units is required to repay the loan as of the date of that Preferred OP unit redemption. Preferred OP units are shown on the balance sheet net of the $100,000 loan under the guidance in EITF No. 85-1, "Classifying Notes Receivable for Capital," (ASC 310-10-45) because the borrower under the loan receivable is also the holder of the Preferred OP units.

The Operating Partnership entered into a Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (the "Partnership Agreement") which provides for the designation and issuance of the Preferred OP units. The Preferred OP units will have priority over all other partnership interests of the Operating Partnership with respect to distributions and liquidation.

Under the Partnership Agreement, Preferred OP units in the amount of $115,000 bear a fixed priority return of 5% and have a fixed liquidation value of $115,000. The remaining balance will participate in distributions with and have a liquidation value equal to that of the common Operating Partnership units. The Preferred OP units became redeemable at the option of the holder on September 1, 2008, which redemption obligation may be satisfied, at the Company's option, in cash or shares of common stock.

From inception through September 28, 2007 (the date of the amendment discussed below), the Preferred OP units were classified as a hybrid instrument such that the value of the units associated with the fixed return were classified in mezzanine after total liabilities on the balance sheet and before stockholders' equity. The remaining balance that participates in distributions equal to that of common OP units had been identified as an embedded derivative and had been classified as a liability on the balance sheet and recorded at fair value on a quarterly basis with any adjustment being recorded through earnings. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the fair value adjustment associated with the embedded derivative was $1,054.

On September 28, 2007, the Operating Partnership entered into an amendment to the Contribution Agreement (the "Amendment"). Pursuant to the Amendment, the maximum number of shares that can be issued upon redemption of the Preferred OP units was set at 116 million, after which the Company will have no further obligations with respect to the redeemed or any other remaining Preferred OP units. As a result of the Amendment, the Preferred OP units are no longer considered a hybrid instrument and the previously identified embedded derivative no longer requires bifurcation and is considered permanent equity of the Operating Partnership. The Preferred OP units are included on the consolidated balance sheet as the noncontrolling interest represented by Preferred OP units, and no recurring fair value measurements are required subsequent to the date of the Amendment.

15. NONCONTROLLING INTEREST REPRESENTED BY PREFERRED OPERATING PARTNERSHIP UNITS (Continued)

On September 18, 2008, the Operating Partnership entered into a First Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership to clarify tax-related provisions relating to the Preferred OP units.

The Company adopted the revisions to FAS 160 (ASC 810) effective January 1, 2009. FAS 160 (ASC 810) requires a company to present ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the company in the consolidated financial statements within the equity section but separate from the company's equity. It also requires the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of operations and requires changes in ownership interest to be accounted for similarly as equity transactions. FAS 160 (ASC 810) was required to be adopted prospectively with the exception of the presentation and disclosure requirements, which were applied retrospectively for all periods presented. As a result of the issuance of the revisions to FAS 160 (ASC 810), the guidance in EITF Topic D-98 (ASC 480-10-S99), "Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities" was amended to include redeemable noncontrolling interests within its scope. If noncontrolling interests are determined to be redeemable, they are to be carried at their redemption value as of the balance sheet date and reported as temporary equity.

The Company has evaluated the terms of the Preferred OP units, and as a result of the adoption of FAS 160 (ASC 810), the Company reclassified the noncontrolling interest represented by the Preferred OP units to stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. In periods subsequent to the adoption of FAS 160 (ASC 810), the Company will periodically evaluate individual noncontrolling interests for the ability to continue to recognize the noncontrolling amount as permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets. Any noncontrolling interests that fail to quality as permanent equity will be reclassified as temporary equity and adjusted to the greater of (1) the carrying amount, or (2) its redemption value as of the end of the period in which the determination is made.

The Company's interest in its properties is held through the Operating Partnership. ESS Holding Business Trust I, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. ESS Business Trust II, also a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is a limited partner of the Operating Partnership. Between its general partner and limited partner interests, the Company held a 94.94% majority ownership interest therein as of December 31, 2009. The remaining ownership interests in the Operating Partnership (including Preferred OP units) of 5.06% are held by certain former owners of assets acquired by the Operating Partnership. As of December 31, 2009, the Operating Partnership had 3,627,368 common OP units outstanding.

The noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership represents OP units that are not owned by the Company. In conjunction with the formation of the Company and as a result of subsequent acquisitions, certain persons and entities contributing interests in properties to the Operating Partnership received limited partnership units in the form of either OP units or Contingent Conversion units. Limited partners who received OP units in the formation transactions or in exchange for

contributions for interests in properties have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem part or all of their OP units for cash based upon the fair market value of an equivalent number of shares of the Company's common stock (10 day average) at the time of the redemption. Alternatively, the Company may, at its option, elect to acquire those OP units in exchange for shares of its common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to anti-dilution adjustments provided in the Operating Partnership agreement. The ten day average closing stock price at December 31, 2009, was $11.73 and there were 3,627,368 OP units outstanding. Assuming that all of the unit holders exercised their right to redeem all of their OP units on December 31, 2009 and the Company elected to pay the non-controlling members cash, the Company would have paid $42,549 in cash consideration to redeem the units.

In December 2009, a member of management redeemed 72,643 OP units in exchange for the Company's common stock. This member of management no longer held any OP units after this redemption.

In November 2009, a director redeemed 217,930 OP units in exchange for the Company's common stock. The director no longer held any OP units after this redemption.

During April 2009, 114,928 OP units were redeemed in exchange for the Company's common stock.

During July 2009, 232,099 OP units were redeemed in exchange for $1,908 in cash.

During October 2008, the Company issued 270,406 OP units valued at $3,621 in conjunction with the acquisition of four properties in Indianapolis, Indiana.

In October 2008, 129,499 OP units were redeemed in exchange for the Company's common stock.

Unlike the OP units, CCUs did not carry any voting rights. Upon the achievement of certain performance thresholds relating to 14 properties, all or a portion of the CCUs automatically converted into OP units. Each CCU was convertible on a one-for-one basis into OP units, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. Beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2006, and ending with the quarter ending December 31, 2008, the Company calculated the net operating income from the 14 wholly-owned properties over the 12-month period ending in such quarter. Within 35 days following the end of each quarter referred to above, some or all of the CCUs were converted so that the total percentage (not to exceed 100%) of CCUs issued in connection with the formation transactions that had been converted to OP units was equal to the percentage determined by dividing the net operating income for such period in excess of $5,100 by $4,600. The 55,957 CCUs remaining unconverted through the calculation made in respect of the 12-month period ending December 31, 2008 were cancelled as of February 4, 2009.

equity transactions. FAS 160 (ASC 81) was required to be adopted prospectively with the exception of the presentation and disclosure requirements, which were applied retrospectively for all periods presented. As a result of the issuance of FAS 160, the guidance in EITF Topic D-98 (ASC 480-10-S99), "Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities" was amended to include redeemable noncontrolling interests within its scope. If noncontrolling interests are determined to be redeemable, they are to be carried at their redemption value as of the balance sheet date and reported as temporary equity.

The Company has evaluated the terms of the common OP units, and as a result of the adoption of FAS 160 (ASC 810), the Company reclassified the noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership to stockholders' equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. In periods subsequent to the adoption of FAS 160 (ASC 810), the Company will periodically evaluate individual noncontrolling interests for the ability to continue to recognize the noncontrolling amount as permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets. Any noncontrolling interests that fail to quality as permanent equity will be reclassified as temporary equity and adjusted to the greater of (1) the carrying amount, or (2) its redemption value as of the end of the period in which the determination is made.

Other noncontrolling interests represent the ownership interests of various third parties in ten consolidated self-storage properties as of December 31, 2009. Two of these consolidated properties were under development, and eight were in the lease-up stage as of December 31, 2009. The ownership interests of the third party owners range from 10% to 90%. Other noncontrolling interests are included in the stockholders' equity section of the Company's consolidated balance sheet. The income or losses attributable to these third party owners based on their ownership percentages are reflected in net income allocated to the Operating Partnership and other noncontrolling interests in the consolidated statement of operations.

In April 2009, the Company requested a capital contribution from its partners in Westport Ewing LLC, a consolidated joint venture, in order to reduce the joint venture's loan with its current lender. The partners were unable to provide their pro rata share of the funds required to satisfy the lender and deeded their interest in Westport Ewing LLC to the Company on June 1, 2009. As a result, the property held by this joint venture became a wholly-owned property of the Company. The Company recorded a loss of $800 related to the reassessment of the fair value of the property.

The Company's charter provides that it can issue up to 300,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 4,100,000 CCSs, $.01 par value per share, and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. As of December 31, 2009, 86,721,841 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding, and no CCSs or shares of preferred stock were issued or outstanding.

On October 3, 2008, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of its common stock at an offering price of $14.71 per share in a registered direct placement to certain clients of RREEF America L.L.C. The

Company received aggregate gross proceeds of $44,130. Transaction costs were $247 for net proceeds of $43,883.

On May 19, 2008, the Company closed a public common stock offering of 14,950,000 shares at an offering price of $16.35 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $244,433. Transaction costs were $11,715 for net proceeds of $232,718.

All holders of the Company's common stock are entitled to receive dividends and to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. The transfer agent and registrar for the Company's common stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company.

Unlike the Company's shares of common stock, CCSs did not carry any voting rights. Upon the achievement of certain performance thresholds relating to 14 properties, all or a portion of the CCSs were automatically converted into shares of the Company's common stock. Each CCS was convertible on a one-for-one basis into shares of common stock, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. Beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2006, and ending with the quarter ending December 31, 2008, the Company calculated the net operating income from the 14 wholly-owned properties over the 12-month period ending in such quarter. Within 35 days following the end of each quarter referred to above, some or all of the CCSs were converted so that the total percentage (not to exceed 100%) of CCSs issued in connection with the formation transactions that were converted to common stock was equal to the percentage determined by dividing the net operating income for such period in excess of $5,100 by $4,600. The 1,087,790 CCSs remaining unconverted through the calculation made in respect of the 12-month period ending December 31, 2008 were cancelled as of February 4, 2009 and restored to the status of authorized but unissued shares of common stock.

The Company has the following plans under which shares were available for grant at December 31, 2009:

Option grants are issued with an exercise price equal to the closing price of stock on the date of grant. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee at the time of grant, options shall vest ratably over a four-year period beginning on the date of grant. Each option will be exercisable once it has vested. Options are exercisable at such times and subject to such terms as determined by the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee, but under no circumstances may be exercised if such exercise would cause a violation of the ownership limit in the Company's charter. Options expire after 10 years from the date of grant.

Also as defined under the terms of the Plans, restricted stock grants may be awarded. The stock grants are subject to a performance or vesting period over which the restrictions are released and the stock certificates are given to the grantee. During the performance or vesting period, the grantee is not

permitted to sell, transfer, pledge, encumber or assign shares of restricted stock granted under the Plans, however, the grantee has the ability to vote the shares and receive nonforfeitable dividends paid on shares. Unless otherwise determined by the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee at the time of grant, the forfeiture and transfer restrictions on the shares lapse over a four-year period beginning on the date of grant.

As of December 31, 2009, 3,560,611 shares were available for issuance under the Plans.

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total value (the difference between the Company's closing stock price on the last trading day of 2009 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31, 2009. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of the Company's stock.

The weighted average fair value of stock options granted in 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $1.31, $1.83 and $2.34, respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

The Black-Scholes model incorporates assumptions to value stock-based awards. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant for the estimated life of the option. The Company uses actual historical data to calculate the expected price volatility, dividend yield and average expected term. The forfeiture rate, which is estimated at a weighted-average of 16.68% of unvested options outstanding as of December 31, 2009, is adjusted periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimates.

A summary of stock options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2009 is as follows:

The Company recorded compensation expense relating to outstanding options of $831, $970 and $865 in general and administrative expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Total cash received for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 related to option exercises was $0, $2,063 and $1,735, respectively. At December 31, 2009, there was $1,050 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options under the Company's 2004 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.55 years. The valuation model applied in this calculation utilizes subjective assumptions that could potentially change over time, including the expected forfeiture rate. Therefore, the amount of unrecognized compensation expense at December 31, 2009, noted above does not necessarily represent the expense that will ultimately be realized by the Company in the Statement of Operations.

For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company granted 547,265, 361,624 and 120,729 shares, respectively of common stock to certain employees and directors, without monetary consideration under the Plans. Restricted stock granted vests over a four year period and is paid non-forfeitable dividends during the term of the grant. The Company recorded $2,978, $2,530 and $1,260 of expense in general and administrative expense in its statement of operations related to outstanding shares of common stock granted to employees and directors for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The forfeiture rate, which is estimated at a weighted-average of 7.0% of unvested awards outstanding as of December 31, 2009, is adjusted periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimates. At December 31, 2009, there was $5,005 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock awards under the Company's 2004 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.72 years.

The fair value of common stock awards is determined based on the closing trading price of the Company's common stock on the grant date. The total fair value of the shares released for the years ending December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $1,365, $1,688, and $982, respectively. A summary of the Company's employee and director share grant activity is as follows:

The Company has a retirement savings plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code under which eligible employees can contribute up to 15% of their annual salary, subject to a statutory prescribed annual limit. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company made matching contributions to the plan of $755, $779 and $999, respectively, based on 100% of the first 3% and up to 50% of the next 2% of an employee's compensation.

As a REIT, the Company is generally not subject to federal income tax with respect to that portion of its income which is distributed annually to its stockholders. However, the Company has elected to treat one of its corporate subsidiaries, Extra Space Management, Inc., as a taxable REIT subsidiary. In general, the Company's TRS may perform additional services for tenants and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate related business (except for the operation or management of health care facilities or lodging facilities or the provision to any person, under a franchise, license or otherwise, of rights to any brand name under which lodging facility or health care facility is operated). A TRS is subject to corporate federal income tax. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities.

The income tax provision for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 is comprised of the following components:

A reconciliation of the statutory income tax provision to the effective income tax provision for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, is as follows:

The Company had a release of its valuation allowance during 2008 from a prior year net operating loss related to the TRS of approximately $1,277. This reduction was offset by an additional valuation allowance recorded that related to state income tax net operating losses that may not be utilized. The net change in the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $1,548.

The major sources of temporary differences stated at their deferred tax effect at December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

The increase in the deferred tax asset related to fixed assets is a result of a portion of the impairment charge due to the wind-down of the Company's development program. The state income tax net operating losses expire between 2012 and 2027 and have been fully reversed through the valuation allowance.

The Company operates in three distinct segments; (1) property management, acquisition and development; (2) rental operations; and (3) tenant reinsurance. Financial information for the Company's business segments are set forth below:

		For the Year Ended December 31,

		2009			2008			2007
Statement of Operations
Total revenues
	Property management, acquisition and development	$	21,291		$	21,465		$	21,502
	Rental operations		238,256			235,695			206,315
	Tenant reinsurance		20,929			16,091			11,049

		$	280,476		$	273,251		$	238,866

Operating expenses, including depreciation and amortization
	Property management, acquisition and development	$	64,576		$	43,097		$	38,740
	Rental operations		138,552			132,626			111,618
	Tenant reinsurance		5,461			5,066			4,710

		$	208,589		$	180,789		$	155,068

Income (loss) from operations
	Property management, acquisition and development	$	(43,285	)	$	(21,632	)	$	(17,238	)
	Rental operations		99,704			103,069			94,697
	Tenant reinsurance		15,468			11,025			6,339

		$	71,887		$	92,462		$	83,798

Interest expense
	Property management, acquisition and development	$	(3,463	)	$	(5,639	)	$	(4,329	)
	Rental operations		(66,355	)		(63,032	)		(59,716	)

		$	(69,818	)	$	(68,671	)	$	(64,045	)

Interest income
	Property management, acquisition and development	$	1,563		$	3,227		$	7,680
	Tenant reinsurance		19			172			245

		$	1,582		$	3,399		$	7,925

Interest income on note receivable from Preferred Operating Partnership unit holder
	Property management, acquisition and development	$	4,850		$	4,850		$	2,492

Gain on repurchase of exchangeable senior notes
	Property management, acquisition and development	$	27,928		$	6,311		$	—

Loss on investments available for sale
	Property management, acquisition and development	$	—		$	(1,415	)	$	(1,233	)

Fair value adjustment of obligation associated with Preferred Operating Partnership units
	Property management, acquisition and development	$	—		$	—		$	1,054

Equity in earnings of real estate ventures
	Rental operations	$	6,964		$	6,932		$	5,300

Income tax expense
	Tenant reinsurance	$	(4,300	)	$	(519	)	$	—

Net income (loss)
	Property management, acquisition and development	$	(12,407	)	$	(14,298	)	$	(11,574	)
	Rental operations		40,313			46,969			40,281
	Tenant reinsurance		11,187			10,678			6,584

		$	39,093		$	43,349		$	35,291

Depreciation and amortization expense
	Property management, acquisition and development	$	2,786		$	1,462		$	1,253
	Rental operations		49,617			48,104			38,548

		$	52,403		$	49,566		$	39,801

Statement of Cash Flows
Acquisition of real estate assets
	Property management, acquisition and development	$	(38,185	)	$	(127,293	)	$	(183,690	)
Development and construction of real estate assets
	Property management, acquisition and development	$	(67,301	)	$	(66,071	)	$	(46,401	)

The Company has operating leases on its corporate offices and owns 13 self-storage facilities that are subject to ground leases. At December 31, 2009, future minimum rental payments under these non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

The monthly rental amount for one of the ground leases is the greater of a minimum amount or a percentage of gross monthly receipts. The Company recorded rent expense of $2,289, $2,262, and $3,115 related to these leases in the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

The Company has guaranteed a construction loan for an unconsolidated partnership that owns a development property in Baltimore, Maryland. This property is owned by joint ventures in which the Company has a 10% equity interest. This guarantee was entered into in November 2004. At December 31, 2009, the total amount of guaranteed mortgage debt relating to this joint venture was $5,412 (unaudited). This mortgage loan matures March 12, 2010. If the joint venture defaults on the loan, the Company may be forced to repay the loan. Repossessing and/or selling the self-storage facility and land that collateralize the loan could provide funds sufficient to reimburse the Company. The estimated fair market value of the encumbered assets at December 31, 2009 is $6,910 (unaudited). The Company has recorded no liability in relation to this guarantee as of December 31, 2009, as the fair value of the guarantee is not material. To date, the joint venture has not defaulted on its mortgage debt. The Company believes the risk of incurring a loss as a result of having to perform on the guarantee is remote.

The Company has been involved in routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. As of December 31, 2009, the Company is not presently involved in any material litigation nor, to its knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against its properties.

On January 21, 2010 the Company closed a joint venture transaction with an affiliate of Harrison Street Real Estate Capital, LLC ("HSRE"). HSRE contributed approximately $15.8 million in cash to the joint venture in return for a 50.0% ownership interest. The Company contributed 19 wholly owned properties and received approximately $15.8 million in cash and a 50.0% ownership interest in the joint venture. The joint venture assumed approximately $101.0 million of existing debt which is secured by the properties. The properties are located in California, Florida, Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia. The Company will continue to operate the properties and will receive a 6.0% management fee. The Company's 50% joint venture interest will be accounted for using the equity method of accounting.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the time of filing these financial statements with the SEC on February 26, 2010.

Extra Space Storage Inc.
Schedule III
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(Dollars in thousands)

																		Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009

																		Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009								Date acquired or development completed
Property Name	State	Debt		Land initial cost		Building and improvements initial cost		Land costs subsequent to acquisition		Building costs subsequent to acquisition		Land Adjustments		Notes	Building Adjustments		Notes	Land		Building and improvements		Total		Accumulated depreciation		Date acquired or development completed
Fort Myers	FL	$	4,400	$	1,985	$	4,983	$	—	$	308	$	—		$	—		$	1,985	$	5,291		7,276		681		Jul-05
Marina Del Rey	CA		18,400		4,248		23,549		—		453		—			—			4,248		24,002		28,250		2,770		Jul-05
Sandy	UT		4,000		1,349		4,372		—		179		—			—			1,349		4,551		5,900		557		Jul-05
Watsonville	CA		3,400		1,699		3,056		—		140		—			—			1,699		3,196		4,895		399		Jul-05
Naples	FL		5,400		2,570		5,102		—		258		—			—			2,570		5,360		7,930		668		Jul-05
Annapolis	MD		3,773		1,375		8,896		—		199		—			—			1,375		9,095		10,470		583		Aug-07
Hemet	CA		5,300		1,146		6,369		—		193		—			—			1,146		6,562		7,708		778		Jul-05
Memphis	TN		2,100		976		1,725		—		188		—			—			976		1,913		2,889		295		Jul-05
Tamiami	FL		6,100		2,979		5,351		—		248		—			—			2,979		5,599		8,578		708		Jul-05
Chatsworth	CA		11,200		3,594		11,166		—		498		—			—			3,594		11,664		15,258		1,404		Jul-05
West Valley City	UT		2,000		461		1,722		—		94		—			—			461		1,816		2,277		232		Jul-05
Memphis	TN		3,100		814		2,766		—		106		—			—			814		2,872		3,686		379		Jul-05
Aloha	OR		6,200		1,221		6,262		—		132		—			—			1,221		6,394		7,615		778		Jul-05
Grandville	MI		1,700		726		1,298		—		251		—			—			726		1,549		2,275		226		Jul-05
Sacramento	CA		4,200		852		4,720		—		282		—			—			852		5,002		5,854		640		Jul-05
Hackensack	NJ		9,500		2,283		11,234		—		527		—			—			2,283		11,761		14,044		1,462		Jul-05
Phoenix	AZ		7,400		1,441		7,982		—		444		—			—			1,441		8,426		9,867		1,029		Jul-05
Louisville	KY		3,000		586		3,244		—		180		—			—			586		3,424		4,010		443		Jul-05
Long Beach	CA		6,200		1,403		7,595		—		338		—			—			1,403		7,933		9,336		973		Jul-05
Kent	OH		1,500		220		1,206		—		134		—			—			220		1,340		1,560		204		Jul-05
Rockville	MD		12,680		4,596		11,328		—		185		—			—			4,596		11,513		16,109		988		Sep-06
New Paltz	NY		5,000		2,059		3,715		—		281		—			—			2,059		3,996		6,055		523		Jul-05
Stone Mountain	GA		1,944		925		3,505		—		160		—			—			925		3,665		4,590		439		Jul-05
Columbus	OH		2,900		483		2,654		—		410		—			—			483		3,064		3,547		462		Jul-05
Houston	TX		3,400		749		4,122		—		174		—			—			749		4,296		5,045		559		Jul-05
Austin	TX		2,400		1,105		2,313		—		150		—			—			1,105		2,463		3,568		371		Jul-05
Plano	TX		3,300		1,613		2,871		—		129		—			—			1,613		3,000		4,613		470		Jul-05
Dallas	TX		4,400		1,010		5,547		—		211		—			—			1,010		5,758		6,768		707		Jul-05
North Highlands	CA		2,200		696		2,806		—		467		—			—			696		3,273		3,969		470		Jul-05
Cordova	TN		2,700		852		2,720		—		139		—			—			852		2,859		3,711		377		Jul-05
Mount Vernon	NY		5,100		1,585		6,025		—		883		—			—			1,585		6,908		8,493		822		Jul-05
Cordova	TN		6,900		1,351		7,476		—		154		—			—			1,351		7,630		8,981		930		Jul-05

Extra Space Storage Inc.
Schedule III (Continued)
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(Dollars in thousands)

																		Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009

																		Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009								Date acquired or development completed
Property Name	State	Debt		Land initial cost		Building and improvements initial cost		Land costs subsequent to acquisition		Building costs subsequent to acquisition		Land Adjustments		Notes	Building Adjustments		Notes	Land		Building and improvements		Total		Accumulated depreciation		Date acquired or development completed
Towson	MD	$	4,100	$	861	$	4,742	$	—	$	114	$	—		$	—		$	861	$	4,856		5,717		590		Jul-05
Dallas	TX		11,700		1,980		12,501		—		177		—			—			1,980		12,678		14,658		1,199		May-06
West Palm Beach	FL		2,600		1,449		2,586		—		265		—			—			1,449		2,851		4,300		412		Jul-05
Plainville	MA		5,400		2,223		4,430		—		301		—			—			2,223		4,731		6,954		689		Jul-05
South Houston	TX		2,566		478		4,069		—		313		—			—			478		4,382		4,860		448		Apr-06
Whitehall	OH		1,500		374		2,059		—		105		—			—			374		2,164		2,538		281		Jul-05
Columbus	OH		3,800		601		3,336		—		109		—			—			601		3,445		4,046		426		Jul-05
New York	NY		16,400		3,060		16,978		—		490		—			—			3,060		17,468		20,528		2,092		Jul-05
Philadelphia	PA		9,000		1,470		8,162		—		894		—			—			1,470		9,056		10,526		1,170		Jul-05
Tampa	FL		4,386		1,425		4,766		—		241		—			—			1,425		5,007		6,432		398		Mar-07
Albuquerque	NM		4,157		1,298		4,628		—		552		—			—			1,298		5,180		6,478		343		Aug-07
Bethesda	MD		12,800		—		18,331		—		232		—			—			—		18,563		18,563		2,271		Jul-05
Mount Clemens	MI		2,100		798		1,796		—		217		—			—			798		2,013		2,811		265		Jul-05
Dallas	TX		2,080		337		2,216		—		320		—			—			337		2,536		2,873		289		Apr-06
Nashville	TN		2,960		390		2,598		—		480		—			—			390		3,078		3,468		317		Apr-06
Houston	TX		4,699		2,596		8,735		—		200		—			—			2,596		8,935		11,531		861		Apr-06
Wichita	KS		2,154		366		1,897		—		269		—			—			366		2,166		2,532		246		Apr-06
Seattle	WA		7,400		2,727		7,241		—		163		—			—			2,727		7,404		10,131		890		Jul-05
Oceanside	CA		9,700		3,241		11,361		—		509		—			—			3,241		11,870		15,111		1,450		Jul-05
Louisville	KY		2,697		1,217		4,611		—		122		—			—			1,217		4,733		5,950		576		Jul-05
Indianapolis	IN		2,971		588		3,457		—		153		—			—			588		3,610		4,198		247		Aug-07
Hoover	AL		2,514		1,313		2,858		—		483		—			—			1,313		3,341		4,654		344		Aug-07
Toms River	NJ		8,300		1,790		9,935		—		238		—			—			1,790		10,173		11,963		1,271		Jul-05
St. Louis	MO		3,908		1,444		4,162		—		207		—			—			1,444		4,369		5,813		310		Aug-07
Phoenix	AZ		—		669		4,135		—		110		—			—			669		4,245		4,914		330		Jan-07
St. Louis	MO		2,780		676		3,551		—		200		—			—			676		3,751		4,427		270		Aug-07
Florissant	MO		3,485		1,241		4,648		—		239		—			—			1,241		4,887		6,128		355		Aug-07
Colorado Springs	CO		3,199		781		3,400		—		129		—			—			781		3,529		4,310		234		Aug-07
Louisville	KY		3,753		892		2,677		—		123		—			—			892		2,800		3,692		303		Dec-05
Everett	MA		3,750		692		2,129		—		536		—			—			692		2,665		3,357		349		Jul-05
Falls Church	VA		6,200		1,259		6,975		—		289		—			—			1,259		7,264		8,523		870		Jul-05
Denver	CO		2,250		368		1,574		—		104		—			—			368		1,678		2,046		222		Jul-05

Extra Space Storage Inc.
Schedule III (Continued)
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(Dollars in thousands)

																		Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009

																		Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009								Date acquired or development completed
Property Name	State	Debt		Land initial cost		Building and improvements initial cost		Land costs subsequent to acquisition		Building costs subsequent to acquisition		Land Adjustments		Notes	Building Adjustments		Notes	Land		Building and improvements		Total		Accumulated depreciation		Date acquired or development completed
Venice	FL	$	7,096	$	1,969	$	5,903	$	—	$	186	$	—		$	—		$	1,969	$	6,089		8,058		645		Jan-06
Alpharetta	GA		2,805		1,893		3,161		—		113		—			—			1,893		3,274		5,167		304		Aug-06
Dacula	GA		3,879		1,993		3,001		—		77		—			—			1,993		3,078		5,071		318		Jan-06
Cordova	TN		1,819		894		2,680		—		90		—			—			894		2,770		3,664		216		Jan-07
Burke	VA		5,100		2,067		4,261		—		140		—			—			2,067		4,401		6,468		554		Jul-05
Chicago	IL		3,200		449		2,471		—		380		—			—			449		2,851		3,300		393		Jul-05
Chicago	IL		2,900		472		2,582		—		502		—			—			472		3,084		3,556		419		Jul-05
Chicago	IL		4,400		621		3,428		—		606		—			—			621		4,034		4,655		551		Jul-05
Nashua	NH		—		—		755		—		73		—			—			—		828		828		119		Jul-05
Linden	NJ		6,700		1,517		8,384		—		126		—			—			1,517		8,510		10,027		1,000		Jul-05
Johnston	RI		7,100		2,658		4,799		—		249		—			—			2,658		5,048		7,706		643		Jul-05
Colorado Springs	CO		3,528		1,525		4,310		—		118		—			—			1,525		4,428		5,953		128		Nov-08
Sugar Hill	GA		—		1,368		2,540		—		91		—			—			1,368		2,631		3,999		184		Jun-07
Stoneham	MA		5,400		944		5,241		—		106		—			—			944		5,347		6,291		638		Jul-05
Deland	FL		—		1,318		3,971		—		95		—			—			1,318		4,066		5,384		425		Jan-06
Duluth	GA		3,433		1,454		4,151		—		67		—			—			1,454		4,218		5,672		285		Jun-07
Sugar Hill	GA		—		1,371		2,547		—		101		—			—			1,371		2,648		4,019		186		Jun-07
Hollywood	FL		7,260		3,214		8,689		—		168		—			—			3,214		8,857		12,071		492		Nov-07
Stafford	VA		0		2,076		5,175		—		30		—			—			2,076		5,205		7,281		128		Jan-09
North Bergen	NJ		11,000		2,299		12,728		—		220		—			—			2,299		12,948		15,247		1,508		Jul-05
Parlin	NJ		6,700		2,517		4,516		—		315		—			—			2,517		4,831		7,348		692		Jul-05
Las Vegas	NV		3,900		748		4,131		—		426		—			—			748		4,557		5,305		645		Jul-05
Pasadena	MD		2,979		1,869		3,056		—		423		—			—			1,869		3,479		5,348		119		Sep-08
Arnold	MD		9,500		2,558		9,446		—		195		—			—			2,558		9,641		12,199		1,141		Jul-05
Columbia	MD		8,400		1,736		9,632		—		159		—			—			1,736		9,791		11,527		1,150		Jul-05
West Palm Beach	FL		4,000		1,752		4,909		—		263		—			—			1,752		5,172		6,924		672		Jul-05
Ft. Washington	MD		11,280		4,920		9,174		—		97		—			—			4,920		9,271		14,191		718		Jan-07
Grandview	MO		1,100		612		1,770		—		224		—			—			612		1,994		2,606		292		Jul-05
Foxboro	MA		3,540		759		4,158		—		395		—			—			759		4,553		5,312		1,383		May-04
Hudson	MA		2,694		806		3,122		—		234		—			—			806		3,356		4,162		936		May-04
Worcester	MA		1,716		896		4,377		—		2,290		—			—			896		6,667		7,563		1,338		May-04

Extra Space Storage Inc.
Schedule III (Continued)
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(Dollars in thousands)

																		Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009

																		Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009								Date acquired or development completed
Property Name	State	Debt		Land initial cost		Building and improvements initial cost		Land costs subsequent to acquisition		Building costs subsequent to acquisition		Land Adjustments		Notes	Building Adjustments		Notes	Land		Building and improvements		Total		Accumulated depreciation		Date acquired or development completed
Claremont	CA	$	2,583	$	1,472	$	2,012	$	—	$	180	$	—		$	—		$	1,472	$	2,192		3,664		321		Jun-04
Kearns	UT		2,464		642		2,607		—		201		—			—			642		2,808		3,450		440		Jun-04
San Bernardino	CA		3,373		1,213		3,061		—		69		—			—			1,213		3,130		4,343		475		Jun-04
Torrance	CA		6,787		3,710		6,271		—		396		400	(d)		—			4,110		6,667		10,777		984		Jun-04
Auburn	MA		3,540		918		3,728		—		159		—			—			918		3,887		4,805		961		May-04
North Oxford	MA		—		482		1,762		—		175		46	(a)		168	(a)		528		2,105		2,633		582		Oct-99
Livermore	CA		4,851		1,134		4,615		—		104		—			—			1,134		4,719		5,853		685		Jun-04
Norwood	MA		—		2,160		2,336		—		1,375		61	(a)		95	(a)		2,221		3,806		6,027		790		Aug-99
Pico Rivera	CA		4,415		1,150		3,450		—		84		—			—			1,150		3,534		4,684		745		Aug-00
Northborough	MA		2,511		280		2,715		—		449		—			—			280		3,164		3,444		810		Feb-01
Raynham	MA		3,502		588		2,270		—		232		82	(a)		323	(a)		670		2,825		3,495		638		May-00
Brockton	MA		2,347		647		2,762		—		91		—			—			647		2,853		3,500		621		May-04
Ashland	MA		—		474		3,324		—		181		—			27	(c)		474		3,532		4,006		757		Jun-03
Richmond	CA		4,623		953		4,635		—		456		—			—			953		5,091		6,044		738		Jun-04
Hawthorne	CA		3,765		1,532		3,871		—		126		—			—			1,532		3,997		5,529		604		Jun-04
Glendale	CA		4,378		—		6,084		—		144		—			—			—		6,228		6,228		916		Jun-04
Parlin	NJ		4,079		—		5,273		—		247		—			—			—		5,520		5,520		1,449		May-04
Marshfield	MA		4,776		1,039		4,155		—		157		—			—			1,039		4,312		5,351		650		Mar-04
Doylestown	PA		3,679		220		3,442		—		232		301	(a)(d)		384	(a)		521		4,058		4,579		791		Nov-99
Glen Rock	NJ		3,925		1,109		2,401		—		102		113	(a)		249	(a)(c)		1,222		2,752		3,974		553		Mar-01
Hoboken	NJ		8,206		2,687		6,092		—		146		—			3	(c)		2,687		6,241		8,928		1,249		Jul-02
Lyndhurst	NJ		6,681		2,679		4,644		—		181		250	(a)		446	(a)(c)		2,929		5,271		8,200		1,043		Mar-01
Pittsburgh	PA		2,848		889		4,117		—		346		—			—			889		4,463		5,352		1,064		May-04
Kennedy Township	PA		2,447		736		3,173		—		145		—			—			736		3,318		4,054		843		May-04
Stoughton	MA		2,963		1,754		2,769		—		187		—			—			1,754		2,956		4,710		733		May-04
Plainview	NY		5,245		4,287		3,710		—		447		—			—			4,287		4,157		8,444		1,061		Dec-00
Oakland	CA		3,029		—		3,777		—		385		—			494	(a)		—		4,656		4,656		1,171		Apr-00
Metuchen	NJ		—		1,153		4,462		—		156		—			—			1,153		4,618		5,771		969		Dec-01
Nanuet	NY		3,792		2,072		4,644		666		838		—			24	(c)		2,738		5,506		8,244		1,080		Feb-02
Dedham	MA		2,618		2,127		3,041		—		411		—			28	(c)		2,127		3,480		5,607		825		Mar-02

Extra Space Storage Inc.
Schedule III (Continued)
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(Dollars in thousands)

																		Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009

																		Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009								Date acquired or development completed
Property Name	State	Debt		Land initial cost		Building and improvements initial cost		Land costs subsequent to acquisition		Building costs subsequent to acquisition		Land Adjustments		Notes	Building Adjustments		Notes	Land		Building and improvements		Total		Accumulated depreciation		Date acquired or development completed
Los Angeles	CA	$	5,385	$	1,431	$	2,976	$	—	$	98	$	180	(a)	$	374	(a)	$	1,611	$	3,448		5,059		867		Mar-00
Las Vegas	NV		—		251		717		—		268		27	(a)		87	(a)		278		1,072		1,350		337		Feb-00
North Miami	FL		5,675		1,256		6,535		—		342		—			—			1,256		6,877		8,133		1,015		Jun-04
St. Louis	MO		—		631		2,159		—		248		59	(a)		205	(a)		690		2,612		3,302		675		Jun-00
St. Louis	MO		—		156		1,313		—		351		17	(a)		151	(a)		173		1,815		1,988		459		Jun-00
Pittsburgh	PA		—		991		1,990		—		387		91	(a)		199	(a)		1,082		2,576		3,658		600		Aug-00
North Lauderdale	FL		3,759		428		3,516		—		485		31	(a)		260	(a)		459		4,261		4,720		1,100		Aug-00
West Palm Beach	FL		1,675		1,164		2,511		—		247		82	(a)		180	(a)		1,246		2,938		4,184		742		Aug-00
Miami	FL		3,528		1,325		4,395		—		278		114	(a)		388	(a)		1,439		5,061		6,500		1,276		Aug-00
Miami	FL		9,488		5,315		4,305		—		173		544	(a)		447	(a)		5,859		4,925		10,784		1,206		Aug-00
Margate	FL		3,364		430		3,139		—		265		39	(a)		287	(a)		469		3,691		4,160		908		Aug-00
West Palm Beach	FL		1,929		1,312		2,511		—		312		104	(a)		204	(a)		1,416		3,027		4,443		800		Aug-00
Inglewood	CA		5,179		1,379		3,343		—		334		150	(a)		377	(a)		1,529		4,054		5,583		1,049		Aug-00
Burbank	CA		9,000		3,199		5,082		—		461		419	(a)		672	(a)		3,618		6,215		9,833		1,467		Aug-00
Arvada	CO		—		286		1,521		—		417		—			—			286		1,938		2,224		564		Sep-00
Denver	CO		—		602		2,052		—		441		143	(a)		512	(a)		745		3,005		3,750		729		Sep-00
Thornton	CO		—		212		2,044		—		447		36	(a)		389	(a)		248		2,880		3,128		779		Sep-00
Westminster	CO		—		291		1,586		—		811		8	(a)		48	(a)		299		2,445		2,744		650		Sep-00
Groton	CT		2,527		1,277		3,992		—		322		—			46	(c)		1,277		4,360		5,637		756		Jan-04
Whittier	CA		2,449		—		2,985		—		44		—			20	(c)		—		3,049		3,049		609		Jun-02
Kingston	MA		—		555		2,491		—		71		—			32	(c)		555		2,594		3,149		581		Oct-02
Mount Vernon	NY		3,512		1,926		7,622		—		498		—			33	(c)		1,926		8,153		10,079		1,502		Nov-02
North Bergen	MA		6,789		2,100		6,606		—		141		—			74	(c)		2,100		6,821		8,921		1,259		Jul-03
Saugus	MA		4,026		1,725		5,514		—		292		—			104	(c)		1,725		5,910		7,635		1,175		Jun-03
Stockton	CA		3,119		649		3,272		—		77		—			—			649		3,349		3,998		676		May-02
Wethersfield	CT		2,851		709		4,205		—		113		—			16	(c)		709		4,334		5,043		844		Aug-02
Jamaica Plain	MA		2,939		3,285		11,275		—		34		—			—			3,285		11,309		14,594		588		Dec-07
Milton	MA		—		2,838		3,979		—		3,370		—			20	(c)		2,838		7,369		10,207		1,058		Nov-02
South Holland	IL		2,833		839		2,879		—		97		26	(a)		108	(a)(c)		865		3,084		3,949		614		Oct-02
Somerville	MA		7,200		1,728		6,570		—		434		3	(a)		13	(a)		1,731		7,017		8,748		1,447		Jun-01

Extra Space Storage Inc.
Schedule III (Continued)
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(Dollars in thousands)

																			Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009

																			Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009								Date acquired or development completed
Property Name	State	Debt		Land initial cost		Building and improvements initial cost		Land costs subsequent to acquisition		Building costs subsequent to acquisition		Land Adjustments			Notes	Building Adjustments		Notes	Land		Building and improvements		Total		Accumulated depreciation		Date acquired or development completed
Crest Hill	IL	$	—	$	847	$	2,946	$	—	$	57	$	121		(a)	$	472	(a)(c)	$	968	$	3,475		4,443		617		Jul-03
Palmdale	CA		—		1,225		5,379		—		2,130		—				—			1,225		7,509		8,734		875		Jan-05
Tracy	CA		2,913		778		2,638		—		88		133		(a)		481	(a)(c)		911		3,207		4,118		564		Jul-03
Edison	NJ		5,830		2,519		8,547		—		321		—				—			2,519		8,868		11,387		1,916		Dec-01
Egg Harbor Twp.	NJ		7,722		1,724		5,001		—		449		—				—			1,724		5,450		7,174		1,211		Dec-01
Hazlet	NJ		10,425		1,362		10,262		—		373		—				—			1,362		10,635		11,997		2,240		Dec-01
Howell	NJ		3,388		2,440		3,407		—		265		—				—			2,440		3,672		6,112		820		Dec-01
Old Bridge	NJ		5,257		2,758		6,450		—		498		—				—			2,758		6,948		9,706		1,525		Dec-01
Iselin	NJ		3,928		505		4,524		—		320		—				—			505		4,844		5,349		1,100		Dec-01
Fontana	CA		3,075		1,246		3,356		—		132		54		(a)		179	(a)(c)		1,300		3,667		4,967		615		Oct-03
North Hollywood	CA		—		3,125		9,257		—		66		—				—			3,125		9,323		12,448		867		May-06
Fontana	CA		3,310		961		3,846		—		97		39		(a)		186	(a)(c)		1,000		4,129		5,129		811		Sep-02
Los Angeles	CA		—		3,991		9,774		—		16		—				—			3,991		9,790		13,781		503		Dec-07
Elk Grove	CA		5,260		952		6,936		—		7		—				—			952		6,943		7,895		533		Dec-07
Gurnee	IL		—		1,374		8,296		—		38		—				—			1,374		8,334		9,708		475		Oct-07
Tracy	CA		—		946		1,937		—		92		—				10	(c)		946		2,039		2,985		394		Apr-04
Middletown	CT		2,140		932		2,810		—		61		—				—			932		2,871		3,803		150		Dec-07
San Bernardino	CA		—		750		5,135		—		24		—				—			750		5,159		5,909		415		Jun-06
Lanham	MD		—		3,346		10,079		—		728		(728	)	(b)		12	(c)		2,618		10,819		13,437		1,731		Feb-04
Lawrenceville	NJ		11,967		3,402		10,230		—		289		—				8	(c)		3,402		10,527		13,929		1,652		Feb-04
Morrisville	NJ		—		2,487		7,494		—		1,047		—				11	(c)		2,487		8,552		11,039		1,342		Feb-04
Philadelphia	PA		—		1,965		5,925		—		874		—				7	(c)		1,965		6,806		8,771		1,074		Feb-04
Quincy	MA		—		1,359		4,078		—		185		—				18	(c)		1,359		4,281		5,640		741		Feb-04
Dedham	MA		—		2,443		7,328		—		520		—				16	(c)		2,443		7,864		10,307		1,301		Feb-04
Waltham	MA		—		3,770		11,310		—		544		—				17	(c)		3,770		11,871		15,641		1,841		Feb-04
Woburn	MA		—		—		—		—		172		—				17	(c)		—		189		189		71		Feb-04
East Somerville	MA		—		—		—		—		105		—				14	(c)		—		119		119		52		Feb-04
Peoria	AZ		2,363		652		4,105		—		22		—				—			652		4,127		4,779		372		Apr-06
Bronx	NY		9,817		3,995		11,870		—		450		—				28	(c)		3,995		12,348		16,343		1,825		Aug-04
Worcester	MA		3,531		1,350		4,433		—		55		—				—			1,350		4,488		5,838		364		Dec-06
Belmont	CA		—		3,500		7,280		—		16		—				—			3,500		7,296		10,796		444		May-07

Extra Space Storage Inc.
Schedule III (Continued)
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(Dollars in thousands)

																					Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009

																					Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009								Date acquired or development completed
Property Name	State	Debt		Land initial cost		Building and improvements initial cost		Land costs subsequent to acquisition		Building costs subsequent to acquisition			Land Adjustments			Notes	Building Adjustments			Notes	Land		Building and improvements		Total		Accumulated depreciation		Date acquired or development completed
Chicago	IL	$	—	$	1,925	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—			$	—			$	1,925	$	—		1,925		—
Chicago	IL		—		2,020		6,997		—		12			—				—				2,020		7,009		9,029		619		Jul-09
Antelope	CA		6,020		1,525		8,345		—		(23	)		(340	)	(b)		—				1,185		8,322		9,507		276		Jul-08
Baltimore	MD		3,120		800		5,955		—		33			—				—				800		5,988		6,788		185		Nov-08
Los Angeles	CA		—		2,200		8,108		—		28			—				—				2,200		8,136		10,336		269		Sep-08
North Aurora	IL		4,915		600		5,833		—		50			—				—				600		5,883		6,483		233		May-08
Los Angeles	CA		—		3,075		—		—		—			(3,075	)	(b)		—				—		—		—		—
Sacramento	CA		5,000		2,410		8,244		—		3			—				—				2,410		8,247		10,657		604		Jan-09
Thousand Oaks	CA		—		4,500		—		—		—			(1,000	)	(e)		—				3,500		—		3,500		—
Pacoima	CA		5,760		3,050		7,597		—		4			—				—				3,050		7,601		10,651		56		Aug-09
Compton	CA		6,571		1,426		7,307		—		285			—				—				1,426		7,592		9,018		247		Sep-08
Carson	CA		—		—		—		—		—			—				—				—		—		—		—
San Leandro	CA		5,900		3,343		6,630		—		2			—				—				3,343		6,632		9,975		7		Jul-09
Ewing	NJ		—		1,552		4,720		—		106			11		(c)		(362	)	(e)		1,563		4,464		6,027		356		Mar-07
Naperville	IL		—		2,800		7,355		—		61			(850	)	(e)		—				1,950		7,416		9,366		201		Dec-08
Santa Clara	CA		109		4,750		8,218		—		7			—				—				4,750		8,225		12,975		60		Jul-09
Edgewood	MD		—		1,000		—		—		—			(575	)	(e)		—				425		—		425		—
Tinley Park	IL		—		1,823		4,794		—		75			(275	)	(e)		—				1,548		4,869		6,417		160		Aug-08
Hialeah	FL		5,053		2,800		7,588		—		31			—				—				2,800		7,619		10,419		254		Aug-08
Oakland	CA		—		3,024		—		—		—			—				—				3,024		—		3,024		—
Sacramento	CA		5,188		1,738		5,522		—		2							(65	)	(c)		1,738		5,459		7,197		252		Dec-07
Simi Valley	CA		—		5,535		—		—		—			(1,285	)	(e)		—				4,250		—		4,250		—
Lancaster	CA		—		1,425		5,855		—		4			—				—				1,425		5,859		7,284		6		Oct-09
Pasadena	MD		—		3,500		—		—		—			—				—				3,500		—		3,500		—
Laurel Heights	MD		4,920		3,000		5,930		—		16			—				—				3,000		5,946		8,946		318		Dec-07
King City	OR		—		2,520		6,845		—		5			—				—				2,520		6,850		9,370		7		Sep-09
Los Gatos	CA		—		2,550		—		—		—			—				—				2,550		—		2,550		—
Arlington	TX		1,658		534		2,525		—		197			—				34		(c)		534		2,756		3,290		448		Aug-04
Austin	TX		5,179		870		4,455		—		137			—				35		(c)		870		4,627		5,497		696		Aug-04
Charleston	SC		—		1,279		4,171		—		54			—				30		(c)		1,279		4,255		5,534		623		Aug-04
Atlanta	GA		—		3,737		8,333		—		238			—				35		(c)		3,737		8,606		12,343		1,220		Aug-04

Extra Space Storage Inc.
Schedule III (Continued)
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(Dollars in thousands)

																		Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009

																		Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009								Date acquired or development completed
Property Name	State	Debt		Land initial cost		Building and improvements initial cost		Land costs subsequent to acquisition		Building costs subsequent to acquisition		Land Adjustments		Notes	Building Adjustments		Notes	Land		Building and improvements		Total		Accumulated depreciation		Date acquired or development completed
Columbia	SC	$	—	$	838	$	3,312	$	—	$	90	$	—		$	38	(c)	$	838	$	3,440		4,278		525		Aug-04
San Antonio	TX		—		1,269		1,816		—		270		—			30	(c)		1,269		2,116		3,385		324		Aug-04
Dallas	TX		7,845		4,432		6,181		—		176		—			36	(c)		4,432		6,393		10,825		958		Aug-04
Fort Myers	FL		—		1,691		4,711		—		132		—			29	(c)		1,691		4,872		6,563		724		Aug-04
Fort Worth	TX		—		631		5,794		—		109		—			31	(c)		631		5,934		6,565		865		Aug-04
Ft Lauderdale	FL		2,869		1,587		4,205		—		211		—			32	(c)		1,587		4,448		6,035		654		Aug-04
Goose Creek	SC		—		1,683		4,372		—		888		—			30	(c)		1,683		5,290		6,973		666		Aug-04
Grand Prairie	TX		2,395		551		2,330		—		73		—			31	(c)		551		2,434		2,985		373		Aug-04
Alpharetta	GL		—		1,973		1,587		—		117		—			20	(c)		1,973		1,724		3,697		264		Aug-04
Madeira Beach	FL		—		1,686		5,163		—		92		—			29	(c)		1,686		5,284		6,970		762		Aug-04
Metairie	LA		—		2,056		4,216		—		96		—			18	(c)		2,056		4,330		6,386		623		Aug-04
New Orleans	LA		—		4,058		4,325		—		449		—			24	(c)		4,058		4,798		8,856		705		Aug-04
Orlando	FL		3,245		1,216		5,008		—		151		—			39	(c)		1,216		5,198		6,414		765		Aug-04
Port Charlotte	FL		—		1,389		4,632		—		79		—			20	(c)		1,389		4,731		6,120		684		Aug-04
Riverview	FL		—		654		2,953		—		94		—			29	(c)		654		3,076		3,730		463		Aug-04
Atlanta	GA		—		1,665		2,028		—		97		—			21	(c)		1,665		2,146		3,811		323		Aug-04
Snellville	GA		—		2,691		4,026		—		126		—			23	(c)		2,691		4,175		6,866		612		Aug-04
Stone Mountain	GA		—		1,817		4,382		—		117		—			24	(c)		1,817		4,523		6,340		662		Aug-04
Summerville	SC		—		450		4,454		—		79		—			26	(c)		450		4,559		5,009		672		Aug-04
Valrico	FL		3,195		1,197		4,411		—		90		—			34	(c)		1,197		4,535		5,732		662		Aug-04
Richmond	VA		—		2,305		5,467		—		76		—			8	(c)		2,305		5,551		7,856		781		Aug-04
San Antonio	TX		—		253		1,496		—		80		—			32	(c)		253		1,608		1,861		254		Aug-04
Lumberton	NJ		4,925		831		4,060		—		95		—			22	(c)		831		4,177		5,008		625		Dec-04
Avenel	NJ		8,080		1,518		8,037		—		135		—			24	(c)		1,518		8,196		9,714		1,082		Jan-05
Bayville	NJ		5,300		1,193		5,312		—		170		—			41	(c)		1,193		5,523		6,716		784		Dec-04
Union	NJ		—		1,754		6,237		—		135		—			78	(c)		1,754		6,450		8,204		935		Dec-04
Bensalem	PA		3,244		1,131		4,525		—		144		—			66	(c)		1,131		4,735		5,866		693		Dec-04
Orlando	FL		8,200		2,233		9,223		—		210		—			21	(c)		2,233		9,454		11,687		1,203		Mar-05
Orlando	FL		6,400		1,474		6,101		—		95		—			21	(c)		1,474		6,217		7,691		799		Mar-05
Ocoee	FL		3,750		872		3,642		—		95		—			17	(c)		872		3,754		4,626		510		Mar-05
Orlando	FL		4,600		1,166		4,816		—		1,106		—			15	(c)		1,166		5,937		7,103		709		Mar-05

Extra Space Storage Inc.
Schedule III (Continued)
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(Dollars in thousands)

																		Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009

																		Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009								Date acquired or development completed
Property Name	State	Debt		Land initial cost		Building and improvements initial cost		Land costs subsequent to acquisition		Building costs subsequent to acquisition		Land Adjustments		Notes	Building Adjustments		Notes	Land		Building and improvements		Total		Accumulated depreciation		Date acquired or development completed
Greenacres	FL	$	—	$	1,463	$	3,244	$	—	$	41	$	—		$	14	(c)	$	1,463	$	3,299		4,762		432		Mar-05
Atlanta	GA		9,600		3,319		8,325		—		186		—			33	(c)		3,319		8,544		11,863		1,135		Feb-05
Lakewood	WA		4,600		1,917		5,256		—		137		—			—			1,917		5,393		7,310		544		Feb-06
Lakewood	WA		4,597		1,389		4,780		—		155		—			—			1,389		4,935		6,324		513		Feb-06
Tacoma	WA		3,491		1,031		3,103		—		104		—			—			1,031		3,207		4,238		339		Feb-06
Bensalem	PA		—		750		3,015		—		109		—			—			750		3,124		3,874		326		Mar-06
Phoenix	AZ		3,440		552		3,530		—		124		—			—			552		3,654		4,206		361		Jun-06
Rowlett	TX		2,129		1,002		2,601		—		140		—			—			1,002		2,741		3,743		253		Aug-06
Lancaster	CA		5,840		1,347		5,827		—		184		—			—			1,347		6,011		7,358		583		Jul-06
Parker	CO		2,772		800		4,549		—		413		—			—			800		4,962		5,762		448		Sep-06
Neptune	NJ		5,866		4,204		8,906		—		139		—			—			4,204		9,045		13,249		736		Nov-06
Allen	TX		4,487		901		5,553		—		117		—			—			901		5,670		6,571		462		Nov-06
Plano	TX		4,795		1,010		6,203		—		145		—			—			1,010		6,348		7,358		513		Nov-06
Plano	TX		—		614		3,775		—		149		—			—			614		3,924		4,538		332		Nov-06
Tampa	FL		3,585		883		3,533		—		111		—			—			883		3,644		4,527		302		Nov-06
San Francisco	CA		13,526		8,457		9,928		—		1,099		—			—			8,457		11,027		19,484		854		Jun-07
Alameda	CA		—		2,919		12,984		—		1,356		—			—			2,919		14,340		17,259		1,053		Jun-07
Berkeley	CA		16,217		1,716		19,602		—		1,154		—			—			1,716		20,756		22,472		1,342		Jun-07
Castro Valley	CA		—		—		6,346		—		208		—			—			—		6,554		6,554		424		Jun-07
Colma	CA		16,523		3,947		22,002		—		1,651		—			—			3,947		23,653		27,600		1,603		Jun-07
Hayward	CA		—		3,149		8,006		—		1,742		—			—			3,149		9,748		12,897		688		Jun-07
Kahului	HI		—		3,984		15,044		—		469		—			—			3,984		15,513		19,497		1,042		Jun-07
Kapolei	HI		15,381		—		24,701		—		320		—			—			—		25,021		25,021		1,639		Jun-07
San Leandro	CA		10,159		4,601		9,777		—		1,711		—			—			4,601		11,488		16,089		797		Aug-07
El Sobrante	CA		—		1,209		4,018		—		818		—			—			1,209		4,836		6,045		377		Jun-07
Vallejo	CA		2,118		1,177		2,157		—		780		—			—			1,177		2,937		4,114		215		Jun-07
Alexandria	VA		6,448		1,620		13,103		—		408		—			—			1,620		13,511		15,131		980		Jun-07
Annapolis	MD		7,049		5,248		7,247		—		103		—			—			5,248		7,350		12,598		529		Apr-07
Pleasanton	CA		3,043		1,208		4,283		—		334		—			—			1,208		4,617		5,825		373		May-07
Modesto	CA		1,544		909		3,043		—		178		—			—			909		3,221		4,130		236		Jun-07
Santa Fe Springs	CA		7,012		3,617		7,022		—		226		—			—			3,617		7,248		10,865		445		Oct-07

Extra Space Storage Inc.
Schedule III (Continued)
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(Dollars in thousands)

																				Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009

																				Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2009								Date acquired or development completed
Property Name	State	Debt		Land initial cost		Building and improvements initial cost		Land costs subsequent to acquisition		Building costs subsequent to acquisition		Land Adjustments			Notes	Building Adjustments			Notes	Land		Building and improvements		Total		Accumulated depreciation		Date acquired or development completed
Miami	FL	$	5,609	$	1,238	$	7,597	$	—	$	166	$	—			$	—			$	1,238	$	7,763		9,001		549		May-07
San Antonio	TX		—		2,471		3,556		—		175		—				(408	)	(f)		2,471		3,323		5,794		194		Dec-07
Bohemia	NY		1,678		1,456		1,398		—		315		—				—				1,456		1,713		3,169		100		Dec-07
Coral Springs	FL		4,056		3,638		6,590		—		152		—				—				3,638		6,742		10,380		279		Jun-08
Carmel	IN		—		1,169		4,393		—		149		—				—				1,169		4,542		5,711		150		Oct-08
Fort Wayne	IN		—		1,899		3,292		—		225		—				—				1,899		3,517		5,416		117		Oct-08
Indianapolis	IN		—		426		2,903		—		189		—				—				426		3,092		3,518		104		Oct-08
Indianapolis	IN		—		850		4,545		—		181		—				—				850		4,726		5,576		156		Oct-08
Mishawaka	IN		2,188		630		3,349		—		167		—				—				630		3,516		4,146		117		Oct-08
Centereach	NY		2,188		2,226		1,657		—		71		—				—				2,226		1,728		3,954		56		Oct-08
Brooklyn	NY		14,592		12,993		10,405		—		63		—				—				12,993		10,468		23,461		330		Oct-08
Estero	FL		—		2,198		8,215		—		—		—				—				2,198		8,215		10,413		61		Jul-09
Hialeah	FL		—		1,678		—		—		—		—				—				1,678		—		1,678		—
El Cajon	CA		—		1,100		6,412		—		—		—				—				1,100		6,412		7,512		7		Sep-09
Bellmawr	NJ		6,600		3,600		4,540		—		33		75		(c)		—				3,675		4,573		8,248		93		Sep-08
Hialeah	FL		1,126		1,750		—		—		—		—				—				1,750		—		1,750		—
Kendall	FL		—		2,374		—		—		—		—				—				2,374		—		2,374		—
Sylmar	CA		4,385		3,058		4,671		—		212		—				—				3,058		4,883		7,941		233		May-08
Ft Lauderdale	FL		—		2,750		—		—		—		—				—				2,750		—		2,750		—
Monmouth Junction	NJ		5,115		1,700		5,260		—		—		—				—				1,700		5,260		6,960		—		Dec-09
Miami	FL		3,940		4,798		9,475		—		—		—				—				4,798		9,475		14,273		12		Nov-09
Peoria	AZ		—		1,060		—		—		—		—				—				1,060		—		1,060		—
Plantation	FL		—		3,850		—		—		—		(1,900	)	(e)		—				1,950		—		1,950		—
Sacramento	CA		—		2,400		7,425		—		8		—				—				2,400		7,433		9,833		55		Sep-09
Baltimore	MD		—		1,900		—		—		—		—				—				1,900		—		1,900		—
Weymouth	MA		4,467		2,806		3,129		—		107		—				—				2,806		3,236		6,042		848		Sep-00
Lynn	MA		2,388		1,703		3,237		—		187		—				—				1,703		3,424		5,127		808		Jun-01
Sherman Oaks	CA		17,204		4,051		12,152		—		228		—				—				4,051		12,380		16,431		1,703		Aug-04
Venice	CA		6,723		2,803		8,410		—		85		—				—				2,803		8,495		11,298		1,172		Aug-04
Riverside	CA		2,489		1,075		4,042		—		354		—				—				1,075		4,396		5,471		655		Aug-04
Merrimack	NH		3,610		754		3,299		—		135		63		(a)		279		(a)		817		3,713		4,530		704		Apr-99

Extra Space Storage Inc.
Schedule III (Continued)
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
(Dollars in thousands)

Activity in real estate facilities during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:

		2009			2008			2007

Operating facilities
	Balance at beginning of year	$	2,121,257		$	1,923,182		$	1,475,674
	Acquisitions		21,764			110,258			400,902
	Improvements		31,652			32,487			17,679
	Transfers from construction in progress		78,148			55,824			30,926
	Dispositions and other		(3,559	)		(494	)		(1,999	)

	Balance at end of year	$	2,249,262		$	2,121,257		$	1,923,182

Accumulated depreciation:
	Balance at beginning of year	$	182,335		$	131,805		$	93,619
	Depreciation expense		50,530			49,031			38,186
	Dispositions and other		965			1,499			—

	Balance at end of year	$	233,830		$	182,335		$	131,805

Construction in progress
	Balance at beginning of year	$	58,734		$	49,945		$	35,336
	Current developent		67,301			64,344			45,764
	Transfers to operating facilities		(78,148	)		(55,824	)		(30,926	)
	Dispositions and other		(13,460	)		269			(229	)

	Balance at end of year	$	34,427		$	58,734		$	49,945

Net real estate assets		$	2,049,859		$	1,997,656		$	1,841,322

The aggregate cost of real estate for U.S. federal income tax purposes is $2,038,831

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based on the definition of "disclosure controls and procedures" in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and in reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

We have a disclosure committee that is responsible for considering the materiality of information and determining the disclosure obligations of the Company on a timely basis. The disclosure committee meets quarterly and reports directly to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2009.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, has issued the following attestation report over our internal control over financial reporting.

We have audited Extra Space Storage Inc. (the "Company")'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Extra Space Storage Inc.'s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009, and 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the period ended December 31, 2009 of Extra Space Storage Inc. and our report dated February 26, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during our most recent quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the captions "Election of Directors," "Executive Officers," "Information About the Board of Directors and its Committees," "Corporate Governance", "meetings and Committees of the Board" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after December 31, 2009.

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics in compliance with rules of the SEC that applies to all of our personnel, including our board of directors, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and principal accounting officer. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available free of charge on the "Investor Info—Corporate Governance" section of our web site at www.extraspace.com. We intend to satisfy any disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by posting such information on our web site at the address and location specified above.

The board of directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and charters for our Audit Committee and Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee, each of which is posted on our website at the address and location specified above. Investors may obtain a free copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the committee charters by contacting the Investor Relations Department at 2795 East Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 400, Salt Lake City, Utah 84121, Attn: Clint Halverson or by telephoning (801) 562-5556.

Information with respect to executive compensation is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the caption "Executive Compensation" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after December 31, 2009.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the captions "Executive Compensation—Equity Compensation Plan Information," "Voting—Principal Stockholders" and "Security Ownership of Directors and Officers" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after December 31, 2009.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Information with respect to certain relationships and related transactions is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the captions "Information about the Board of Directors and its Committees" and "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" in our Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after December 31, 2009.

Information with respect to principal accountant fees and services is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the caption "Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in our Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after December 31, 2009.

(1) and (2). All Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules filed as part of this Annual Report on 10-K are included in Item 8—"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Annual Report on 10-K and reference is made thereto.

(3) The following documents are filed or incorporated by references as exhibits to this report:

Exhibit Number			Description

	2.1		Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated May 5, 2005 by and among Security Capital Self Storage Incorporated, as seller and Extra Space Storage LLC, PRISA Self Storage LLC, PRISA II Self Storage LLC, PRISA III Self Storage LLC, VRS Self Storage LLC, WCOT Self Storage LLC and Extra Space Storage LP, as purchaser parties and The Prudential Insurance Company of America (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 of Form 8-K filed on May 11, 2005).
	3.1		Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Extra Space Storage Inc.(1)
	3.2		Articles of Amendment dated September 28, 2007 (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2007).
	3.3		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Extra Space Storage Inc.(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of Form 8-K filed on May 26, 2009)
	3.4		Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Extra Space Storage LP (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed on June 26, 2007).
	3.5		Declaration of Trust of ESS Holdings Business Trust I.(1)
	3.6		Declaration of Trust of ESS Holdings Business Trust II.(1)
	4.1		Junior Subordinated Indenture dated as of July 27, 2005, between Extra Space Storage LP and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of Form 8-K filed on August 2, 2005).
	4.2		Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated as of July 27, 2005, among Extra Space Storage LP, as depositor and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as property trustee, Chase Bank USA, National Association, as Delaware trustee, the Administrative Trustees named therein and the holders of undivided beneficial interest in the assets of ESS Statutory Trust III (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 of Form 8-K filed on August 2, 2005).
	4.3		Junior Subordinated Note(2)
	4.4		Trust Preferred Security Certificates(2)
	4.5		Indenture, dated March 27, 2007 among Extra Space Storage LP, Extra Space Storage Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee, including the form of 3.625% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2027 and form of guarantee (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of Form 8-K filed on March 28, 2007).
	10.1		Registration Rights Agreement, by and among Extra Space Storage Inc. and the parties listed on Schedule I thereto.(1)
	10.2		License between Centershift Inc. and Extra Space Storage LP.(1)

Exhibit Number			Description

	10.6		2004 Long-Term Compensation Incentive Plan as amended and restated effective March 25, 2008 (incorporated by reference from the Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 14, 2008)
	10.7		Extra Space Storage Performance Bonus Plan.(1)
	10.8		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated August 28, 2008, by and between Extra Space Storage Inc. and Kenneth M. Woolley (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed on September 4, 2008).
	10.9		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated August 28, 2008, by and between Extra Space Storage Inc. and Kent W. Christensen (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of Form 8-K filed on September 4, 2008).
	10.10		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated August 28, 2008, by and between Extra Space Storage Inc. and Charles L. Allen (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 of Form 8-K filed on September 4, 2008).
	10.11		Form of 2004 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan Option Award Agreement for Employees with employment agreements.(2)
	10.12		Form of 2004 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan Option Award Agreement for employees without employment agreements.(2)
	10.13		Form of 2004 Non-Employee Directors Share Plan Option Award Agreement for Directors.(2)
	10.14		Joint Venture Agreement, dated June 1, 2004, by and between Extra Space Storage LLC and Prudential Financial, Inc.(1)
	10.15		Extra Space Storage Non-Employee Directors' Share Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.22 of Form 10-K/A filed on March 22, 2007).
	10.16		Purchase Agreement, dated June 20, 2005, among Extra Space Storage Inc. and the investors named therein (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2005).
	10.17		Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 20, 2005, among Extra Space Storage Inc. and the investors named therein (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2005).
	10.18		Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 27, 2005, among Extra Space Storage LP, ESS Statutory Trust III and the Purchaser named therein (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed on August 2, 2005).
	10.19		Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 27, 2005, among Extra Space Storage LP, ESS Statutory Trust III and the Purchaser named therein (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed on August 2, 2005).
	10.21		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated August 28, 2008, by and between Extra Space Storage Inc. and Karl Haas (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 of Form 8-K filed on September 4, 2008).
	10.22		Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 27, 2007, among Extra Space Storage LP, Extra Space Storage Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed on March 28, 2007).

Exhibit Number			Description

	10.23		Contribution Agreement, dated June 15, 2007, among Extra Space Storage LP and various limited partnerships affiliated with AAAAA Rent-A-Space.(2)
	10.24		Promissory Note, dated June 25, 2007, among Extra Space Storage LP, H. James Knuppe and Barbara Knuppe (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Form 8-K filed on June 26, 2007).
	10.25		Pledge Agreement, dated June 25, 2007, among Extra Space Storage LP, H. James Knuppe and Barbara Knuppe (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Form 8-K filed on June 26, 2007).
	10.26		Registration Rights Agreement among Extra Space Storage LP, H. James Knuppe and Barbara Knuppe.(2)
	10.27		First Amendment to Contribution Agreement and to Agreement Regarding Transfer of Series A units among Extra Space Storage LP, various limited partnerships affiliated with AAAAA Rent-A-Space, H. James Knuppe and Barbara Knuppe, dated September 28, 2007. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2007).
	10.28		2004 Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 of Form 10-Q filed on November 7, 2007).
	10.29		First Amendment to Extra Space Storage Inc. 2004 Non-Employee Directors' Share Plan (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 of Form 10-Q filed on November 7, 2007).
	10.30		Loan Agreement between ESP Seven Subsidiary LLC as Borrower and General Electric Capital Corporation as Lender, dated October 16, 2007.(2)
	10.31		Subscription Agreement, dated December 31, 2007, among Extra Space Storage LLC and Extra Space Development, LLC.(2)
	10.32		First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Extra Space Storage LP, dated September 18, 2008.(2)
	10.33		Revolving Promissory Note between Extra Space Properties Thirty LLC and Bank of America as Lender, dated February 13, 2009(2)
	10.34		Revolving Line of Credit between Extra Space Properties Thirty LLC and Bank of America as Lender, dated February 13, 2009(2)
	14.0		Code of Business Conduct and Ethics adopted May 23, 2007 (incorporated by reference from the Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14A filed on April 14, 2008.)
	21.1		Subsidiaries of the Company(2)
	23.1		Consent of Ernst & Young LLP(2)
	31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(2)
	31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(2)
	32		Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(2)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


(Mark One)
ý		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
OR
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to .

Title of Each Class		Name of exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.01 par value		New York Stock Exchange, Inc.


Large accelerated filer ý		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o


PART I		4
ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	4
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	8
ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	22
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	22
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	25
ITEM 4.	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS	25
PART II		26
ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	26
ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	27
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	28
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	47
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	48
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	111
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	111
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	113
PART III		114
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	114
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	114
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	114
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	114
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES	114
PART IV		115
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	115
SIGNATURES		118

		Range

		Range				Dividends Declared
Year	Quarter	High		Low		Dividends Declared
2008	1st		17.41		12.33		0.2500
	2nd		17.90		15.08		0.2500
	3rd		17.74		13.67		0.2500
	4th		15.53		5.98		0.2500
2009	1st		10.49		4.93		0.2500
	2nd		9.04		5.36		0.0000
	3rd		11.58		7.38		0.0000
	4th		12.23		9.13		0.1300


Maryland (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		20-1076777 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

	December 31, 2009				December 31, 2008

	Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value
Note receivable from Preferred OP unit holder	$	112,740	$	100,000	$	124,024	$	100,000
Fixed rate notes payable and notes payable to trusts	$	1,067,653	$	1,015,063	$	1,062,949	$	937,756
Exchangeable senior notes	$	110,122	$	87,663	$	131,039	$	209,663

		Payments due by Period:

		Total		Less Than 1 Year (2010)		1-3 Years (2011-2012)		3-5 Years (2013-2014)		After 5 Years (after 2014)
Operating leases		$	63,232	$	5,942	$	10,579	$	8,704	$	38,007
Notes payable, notes payable to trusts, exchangeable senior notes and lines of credit
	Interest		520,170		68,237		118,676		95,523		237,734
	Principal		1,406,846		179,068		254,843		287,204		685,731

Total contractual obligations		$	1,990,248	$	253,247	$	384,098	$	391,431	$	961,472


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM		49
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS		50
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS		51
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY		52
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS		53
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		55
SCHEDULE III		99

					Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using

Description		December 31, 2009			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Other liabilities—Swap Agreement 1		$	(340	)	$	—	$	(340	)	$	—
Other liabilities—Swap Agreement 2			(478	)		—		(478	)		—
Other liabilities—Swap Agreement 3			(244	)		—		(244	)		—
Other liabilities—Swap Agreement 4			(49	)		—		(49	)		—

	Total	$	(1,111	)	$	—	$	(1,111	)	$	—


Balance as of December 31, 2007			$	21,812
	Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized)
		Included in earnings		(1,415	)
		Included in other comprehensive income		1,415
	Settlements received in cash			(21,812	)

Balance as of December 31, 2008			$	—

Amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at December 31, 2008			$	—

		December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008

Land—operating		$	501,674		$	461,883
Land—development			32,635			64,392
Buildings and improvements			1,675,340			1,555,598
Intangible assets—tenant relationships			33,463			33,234
Intangible lease rights			6,150			6,150

			2,249,262			2,121,257
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization			(233,830	)		(182,335	)

	Net operating real estate assets		2,015,432			1,938,922
Real estate under development			34,427			58,734

	Net real estate assets	$	2,049,859		$	1,997,656

Real estate assets held for sale included in net real estate assets		$	11,275		$	—

	Loan Amount				Debt Maturity

ESW—Fixed	$	16,650	4.59	%	July 2010
ESW II—Fixed		20,000	5.48	%	March 2012
ESNPS—Fixed		34,500	5.27	%	June 2015
ESSM—Variable		10,394	3.19	%	November 2011
Clarendon—Swapped to fixed		8,500	5.93	%	September 2018
PRISA		—	—		Unleveraged
PRISA II		—	—		Unleveraged
PRISA III—Fixed		145,000	4.97	%	August 2012
VRS—Fixed		52,100	4.76	%	August 2012
WCOT—Fixed		92,140	4.76	%	August 2012
SPB II—Fixed		60,085	8.00	%	August 2014
SP I—Fixed		115,000	4.62	%	April 2011
U-Storage		—	—		Unleveraged
Other minority owned properties		119,270	various		various

	December 31,

Balance Sheets:	2009		2008
Assets:
Net real estate assets	$	1,977,184	$	2,041,268
Other		33,120		34,775

	$	2,010,304	$	2,076,043

Liabilities and members' equity:
Notes Payable	$	535,475	$	542,790
Other liabilities		27,547		33,264
Members' equity		1,447,282		1,499,989

	$	2,010,304	$	2,076,043

	For the Year Ended December 31,

Statements of Income:	2009		2008		2007
Rents and other income	$	282,181	$	295,824	$	294,395
Expenses		195,330		197,926		195,776

Net income	$	86,851	$	97,898	$	98,619

Joint Venture					Total Assets		Notes Payable		Payables to Company (eliminated)		Payables and Other Liabilities		Company's Equity (eliminated)			JV Partners' Equity (non- controlling interest)

Extra Space of Montrose Avenue LLC	10	%	40	%	$	8,481	$	—	$	8,572	$	205	$	(46	)	$	(250	)
ESS of Sacramento One LLC	50	%	50	%		10,191		5,000		5,289		30		(614	)		486
ES of Washington Avenue LLC	50	%	50	%		10,020		5,900		2,789		47		642			642
ES of Franklin Blvd LLC	50	%	50	%		7,002		5,188		2,166		—		(176	)		(176	)
ESS of Plantation LLC	72	%	65	%		2,137		—		56		49		1,472			560

					$	37,831	$	16,088	$	18,872	$	331	$	1,278		$	1,262

	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008

Equipment and fixtures	$	11,836		$	10,671
Less: accumulated depreciation		(9,046	)		(7,309	)
Other intangible assets		3,303			3,296
Deferred financing costs, net		15,458			12,330
Prepaid expenses and deposits		5,173			5,828
Accounts receivable, net		15,086			11,120
Fair value of interest rate swaps		—			647
Investments in Trusts		3,590			3,590
Deferred tax asset		5,576			2,403

	$	50,976		$	42,576

	December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008

*Fixed Rate*
Mortgage and construction loans with banks (including loans subject to interest rate swaps) bearing interest at fixed rates between 4.24% and 7.30%. The loans are collateralized by mortgages on real estate assets and the assignment of rents. Principal and interest payments are made monthly with all outstanding principal and interest due between March 2010 and August 2019.	$	895,473	$	818,166
*Variable Rate*
Mortgage and construction loans with banks bearing floating interest rates (including loans subject to reverse interest rate swaps) based on LIBOR and Prime. Interest rates based on LIBOR are between LIBOR plus 1.45% (1.68% and 1.89% at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 respectively) and LIBOR plus 4.0% (4.23% and 4.44% at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively). Interest rates based on Prime are at Prime plus 1.50% (4.75% and 4.75% at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively). The loans are collateralized by mortgages on real estate assets and the assignment of rents. Principal and interest payments are made monthly with all outstanding principal and interest due between August 2010 and December 2015.		204,120		125,432

	$	1,099,593	$	943,598


2010	$	179,068
2011		113,369
2012		41,476
2013		85,441
2014		201,763
Thereafter		478,476

	$	1,099,593

Hedge Product	Hedge Type	Notional Amount		Strike	Effective Date	Maturity

Reverse Swap Agreement	Fair Value	$	61,770	LIBOR plus 0.65%	10/31/2004	6/1/2009
Swap Agreement 1	Cash Flow	$	63,000	4.24%	2/1/2009	6/30/2013
Swap Agreement 2	Cash Flow	$	26,000	6.32%	7/1/2009	7/1/2014
Swap Agreement 3	Cash Flow	$	8,462	6.98%	7/27/2009	6/27/2016
Swap Agreement 4	Cash Flow	$	10,000	6.12%	11/2/2009	11/1/2014

		For the Year Ended December 31,

	Classification of Income (Expense)	For the Year Ended December 31,
Type	Classification of Income (Expense)	2009			2008		2007
Reverse Swap Agreement	Interest expense	$	916		$	223	$	(1,032	)
Swap Agreement 1	Interest expense		(923	)		—		—
Swap Agreement 2	Interest expense		(309	)		—		—
Swap Agreement 3	Interest expense		(126	)		—		—
Swap Agreement 4	Interest expense		(21	)		—		—

		$	(463	)	$	223	$	(1,032	)

	Gain (loss) recognized in OCI				Gain (loss) reclassified from OCI

	Gain (loss) recognized in OCI			Location of amounts reclassified from OCI into income	Gain (loss) reclassified from OCI
Type	For the Year Ended December 31, 2009			Location of amounts reclassified from OCI into income	For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
Swap Agreement 1	$	(340	)	Interest expense	$	(923	)
Swap Agreement 2		(478	)	Interest expense		(309	)
Swap Agreement 3		(244	)	Interest expense		(126	)
Swap Agreement 4		(49	)	Interest expense		(21	)

	$	(1,111	)		$	(1,379	)

	Asset (Liability) Derivatives

	December 31, 2009				December 31, 2008
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value			Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
Reverse Swap Agreement (expired 6/1/2009)	n/a	$	—		Other assets	$	647
Swap Agreement 1	Other liabilities		(340	)	n/a		—
Swap Agreement 2	Other liabilities		(478	)	n/a		—
Swap Agreement 3	Other liabilities		(244	)	n/a		—
Swap Agreement 4	Other liabilities		(49	)

		$	(1,111	)		$	647

	Notes payable to Trusts as of December 31, 2009		Maximum exposure to loss		Difference

Trust	$	36,083	$	35,000	$	1,083
Trust II		42,269		41,000		1,269
Trust III		41,238		40,000		1,238

	$	119,590	$	116,000	$	3,590

	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008

Carrying amount of equity component	$	19,545		$	21,779

Principal amount of liability component	$	87,663		$	209,663
Unamortized discount		(3,869	)		(13,031	)

Net carrying amount of liability component	$	83,794		$	196,632

		October 2009			May 2009			March 2009			October 2008

Principal amount repurchased		$	7,500		$	43,000		$	71,500		$	40,337

Amount allocated to:
	Extinguishment of liability component	$	6,700		$	35,000		$	43,800		$	30,696
	Reacquisition of equity component		181			1,340			713			1,025

Total cash paid for repurchase		$	6,881		$	36,340		$	44,513		$	31,721

Exchangeable senior notes repurchased		$	7,500		$	43,000		$	71,500		$	40,337
Extinguishment of liability component			(6,700	)		(35,000	)		(43,800	)		(30,696	)
Discount on exchangeable senior notes			(366	)		(2,349	)		(4,208	)		(2,683	)
Related debt issuance costs			(82	)		(558	)		(1,009	)		(647	)

Gain on repurchase		$	352		$	5,093		$	22,483		$	6,311

	December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008

Deferred rental income	$	12,045	$	12,535
Lease obligation liability		6,260		3,029
Fair value of interest rate swaps		1,111		—
Income taxes payable		2,145		2,825
Other miscellaneous liabilities		3,413		3,878

	$	24,974	$	22,267

	December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008

Development fees receivable	$	250	$	1,382
Other receivables from properties		4,864		9,953

	$	5,114	$	11,335

Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Aggregate Intrinsic Value as of December 31, 2009

Outstanding at December 31, 2006	2,564,563		$	13.92
Granted	418,000			18.51
Exercised	(126,801	)		13.68
Forfeited	(204,044	)		14.71

Outstanding at December 31, 2007	2,651,718		$	14.54
Granted	380,000			15.57
Exercised	(146,795	)		13.09
Forfeited	(43,000	)		14.26

Outstanding at December 31, 2008	2,841,923		$	14.76
Granted	723,000			6.22
Exercised	—			—
Forfeited	(107,875	)		13.36

Outstanding at December 31, 2009	3,457,048		$	13.02	6.54	$	3,854

Vested and Expected to Vest	3,229,780		$	13.33	6.38	$	2,922
Ending Exercisable	2,222,695		$	14.38	5.43	$	—

	Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable

	Shares		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$6.22		723,000		9.13	$	6.22		—	$	—
$12.50		937,272		4.61		12.50		937,272		12.50
$12.85 - $15.53		966,400		6.36		14.87		734,650		14.90
$15.66 - $19.00		630,376		6.52		16.56		450,773		16.22
$19.91 - $19.91		200,000		7.14		19.91		100,000		19.91

$6.22 - $19.91		3,457,048		6.54	$	13.02		2,222,695	$	14.38

Restricted Stock Grants			Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value

Unreleased at December 31, 2006	156,300		$	15.94
Granted	120,729			18.17
Released	(61,975	)		15.90
Cancelled	(3,082	)		18.39

Unreleased at December 31, 2007	211,972		$	17.23
Granted	361,624			15.69
Released	(122,206	)		16.45
Cancelled	(10,186	)		17.21

Unreleased at December 31, 2008	441,204		$	16.21
Granted	547,265			6.19
Released	(198,284	)		13.51
Cancelled	(21,256	)		9.82

Unreleased at December 31, 2009	768,929		$	9.95

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2009

	Federal			State		Total
Current	$	4,177		$	1,171	$	5,348
Deferred benefit		(1,048	)		—		(1,048	)

Total tax expense	$	3,129		$	1,171	$	4,300

	December 31, 2009					December 31, 2008

Expected tax at statutory rate	$	15,188		35.0	%	$	16,118		34.0	%
Non-taxable REIT income		(12,580	)	(29.0	)%		(14,555	)	(30.7	)%
State and local tax expense (benefit)—net of federal benefit		1,167		2.7	%		(587	)	(1.2	)%
Change in valuation allowance		541		1.2	%		(690	)	(1.5	)%
Miscellaneous		(16	)	0.0	%		233		0.5	%

Total provision	$	4,300		9.9	%	$	519		1.1	%

	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008

Captive insurance subsidiary	$	182		$	109
Fixed assets		3,122			34
Various liabilities		1,603			1,042
Stock compensation		1,865			1,218
State net operating losses		939			587

		7,711			2,990
Valuation allowance		(2,135	)		(587	)

Net deferred tax asset	$	5,576		$	2,403

		December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008

Balance Sheet
Investment in real estate ventures
	Rental operations	$	130,449	$	136,791
Total assets
	Property management, acquisition and development	$	466,399	$	466,474
	Rental operations		1,922,643		1,811,417
	Tenant reinsurance		18,514		13,117

		$	2,407,556	$	2,291,008