10-Q

UNITED STATES 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One) 

☒  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016

or 

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to _________

Commission File Number: 000-50755

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Florida	55-0865043
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

2477 East Commercial Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308 

(Address of principal executive offices)

954-900-2800 

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A 

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒   No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒   No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filer ☐		Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐   No ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 1,099,826 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, issued and outstanding as of November 14, 2016.

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

INDEX

	Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - September 30, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, 2015	1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations - Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)	2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income - Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)	3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity - Nine Months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)	4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Nine Months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)	5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	26
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	31
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	32
Item 3. Defaults on Senior Securities	32
Item 6. Exhibits	32
SIGNATURES	33

i 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
 (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

	September 30,			December 31,
	2016			2015
Assets:	(Unaudited)
Cash and due from banks	$	11,337		$	10,162
Interest-bearing deposits with banks		103			203
Total cash and cash equivalents		11,440			10,365
Securities available for sale		21,931			25,749
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $4,169 and $2,295		81,332			82,573
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,018			966
Premises and equipment, net		2,680			2,703
Foreclosed real estate, net		2,412			4,029
Accrued interest receivable		389			462
Other assets		519			631
Total assets	$	121,721		$	127,478
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		9,715			9,478
Savings, NOW and money-market deposits		22,943			24,034
Time deposits		57,650			64,059
Total deposits		90,308			97,571
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		20,500			20,000
Junior subordinated debenture		5,155			5,155
Advanced payment by borrowers for taxes and insurance		682			251
Official checks		159			130
Other liabilities		1,600			1,404
Total liabilities		118,404			124,511
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, no par value; 6,000,000 shares authorized, 7 shares issued and outstanding in 2016 and 4 shares issued and outstanding in 2015		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, 1,099,826 shares issued and outstanding in 2016 and 50,000,000 shares authorized, 9,628,863 shares issued and outstanding in 2015		11			96
Additional paid-in capital		34,025			33,330
Accumulated deficit		(30,629	)		(30,321	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(90	)		(138	)
Total stockholders’ equity		3,317			2,967
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	121,721		$	127,478

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

1 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2016		2015			2016			2015
Interest income:
Loans	$	1,082	$	974		$	3,156		$	2,828
Securities		117		148			367			455
Other		24		20			75			58
Total interest income		1,223		1,142			3,598			3,341
Interest expense:
Deposits		181		162			550			479
Borrowings		91		60			260			176
Total interest expense		272		222			810			655
Net interest income		951		920			2,788			2,686
Provision for loan losses		—		—			—			—
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		951		920			2,788			2,686
Noninterest income:
Service charges and fees		22		61			63			91
Gain on sale of securities available for sale		2		28			48			60
Other		7		83			14			221
Total noninterest income		31		172			125			372
Noninterest expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits		430		460			1,385			1,402
Occupancy and equipment		112		118			346			365
Data processing		77		84			250			224
Professional fees		151		171			480			423
Insurance		27		29			78			88
Foreclosed real estate, net		5		358			42			404
Regulatory assessment		74		78			221			225
Other		84		68			419			377
Total noninterest expenses		960		1,366			3,221			3,508
Earnings (loss) before tax benefit		22		(274	)		(308	)		(450	)
Income tax benefit		—		(320	)		—			(320	)
Net earnings (loss)	$	22	$	46		$	(308	)	$	(130	)
Net earnings (loss) per share:
Basic and diluted	$	.02	$	.05		$	(0.30	)	$	(.12	)
Dividends per share		—	$	—			—		$	—

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

2 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income (Unaudited)
 (In thousands)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Net earnings (loss)	$	22		$	46			(308	)	$	(130	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale:
Unrealized (loss) gain arising during the period		(281	)		206			129			53
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on securities available for sale		(2	)		(28	)		(48	)		(60	)
Net change in unrealized (loss) gain		(283	)		178			81			(7	)
Deferred income taxes (benefit) on above change		(107	)		67			33			(3	)
Total other comprehensive (loss) income		(176	)		111			48			(4	)
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(154	)	$	157		$	(260	)	$	(134	)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity 

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 

 (Dollars in thousands) 

																	Accumulated
																	Other
											Additional						Comprehensive			Total
	Preferred Stock				Common Stock						Paid-In			Accumulated			Income			Stockholders’
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			Capital			Deficit			(Loss)			Equity
Balance at December 31, 2014		—		—		9,305,236		$	93		$	32,961		$	(30,158	)	$	83		$	2,979
Proceeds from sale of common stock (unaudited)		—		—		37,500			—			30			—			—			30
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock (unaudited)		3		—		—			—			75			—			—			75
Common stock issued as compensation to directors (unaudited)		—		—		251,123			2			227			—			—			229
Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 (unaudited)		—		—		—			—			—			(130	)		—			(130	)
Net change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale (unaudited)		—		—		—			—			—			—			(4	)		(4	)
Balance at September 30, 2015 (unaudited)		3	$	—		9,593,859		$	95		$	33,293		$	(30,288	)	$	79		$	3,179
Balance at December 31, 2015		4	$	—		9,628,863		$	96		$	33,330		$	(30,321	)	$	(138	)	$	2,967
Reverse common stock split (1-for-10) (unaudited)		—		—		(8,665,694	)		(87	)		87			—			—			—
Proceeds from sale of Preferred stock (unaudited)		3		—		—			—			75			—			—			75
Proceeds from sale of common stock (unaudited)		—		—		92,980			1			374			—			—			375
Common stock issued as compensation to directors (unaudited)		—		—		53,855			1			231			—			—			232
Common stock issued for services (unaudited)		—		—		36,118			—			128			—			—			128
Reversal of common stock issued as compensation to directors (unaudited) (See Note 13)		—		—		(46,296	)		—			(200	)		—			—			(200	)
Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 (unaudited)		—		—		—			—			—			(308	)		—			(308	)
Net change in unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net of taxes (unaudited)		—		—		—			—			—			—			48			48
Balance at September 30, 2016 (unaudited)		7		—		1,099,826		$	11		$	34,025		$	(30,629	)	$	(90	)	$	3,317

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

4 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)  

 (In thousands)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2016			2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(308	)	$	(130	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		118			120
Gain on sale of securities available for sale		(48	)		(60	)
Common stock issued as compensation to directors		32			229
Common stock issued as compensation for services		128			—
Net amortization of fees, premiums and discounts		38			483
Decrease (increase) in other assets		79			(68	)
Write-down of foreclosed real estate		—			280
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable		73			(19	)
Increase in official checks and other liabilities		225			1
Net cash provided by operating activities		337			836
Cash flows from investing activities:
Principal repayments and maturity of securities available for sale		3,074			3,462
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale		18,028			8,255
Purchase of securities available for sale		(17,294	)		(11,053	)
Net decrease (increase) in loans		1,342			(1,221	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(95	)		(23	)
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate, net		1,617			610
(Purchase) Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		(52	)		359
Net cash provided by investing activities		6,620			389
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net (decrease) increase in deposits		(7,263	)		1,201
Increase in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance		431			415
Purchase (Repayment) of Federal Home Loan Bank advances, net		500			(6,740	)
Proceeds from sale of common stock		375			30
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock		75			75
Net cash used in financing activities		(5,882	)		(5,019	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		1,075			(3,794	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period		10,365			12,074
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	11,440		$	8,280

5 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited), Continued 

 (In thousands)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2016		2015
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	671	$	537
Income Taxes	$	—	$	—
Noncash —  Investing Activity
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net change in unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale	$	48	$	(4	)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

(continued)

6 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(1)	General.  OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (the “Holding Company”) is a one-bank holding company and owns 100% of OptimumBank (the “Bank”), a Florida-chartered commercial bank. The Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries are OB Real Estate Management, LLC and OB Real Estate Holdings, LLC, both of which were formed in 2009; OB Real Estate Holdings 1692 and OB Real Estate Holdings 1704 formed in 2012, collectively, (the “Real Estate Holding Subsidiaries”). The Holding Company’s only business is the operation of the Bank and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). The Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Bank offers a variety of community banking services to individual and corporate customers through its three banking offices located in Broward County, Florida. OB Real Estate Management, LLC is primarily engaged in managing foreclosed real estate. This subsidiary had no activity in 2016 and 2015. All other subsidiaries are primarily engaged in holding and disposing of foreclosed real estate.
	In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company contain all adjustments (consisting principally of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position at September 30, 2016, the results of operations and comprehensive (loss) income for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 and cash flows for the nine month periods ending September 30, 2016 and 2015. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
	Going Concern Status. The Company is in default with respect to its $5,155,000 Junior Subordinated Debenture (“Debenture”) due to its failure to make certain required interest payments under the Debenture. The Trustee of the Debenture (the “Trustee”) or the holders of the Debenture are entitled to accelerate the payment of the $5,155,000 principal balance plus accrued and unpaid interest totaling $1,095,700 at September 30, 2016. No adjustments to the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been made as a result of this uncertainty. Management’s plans with regard to this matter are as follows: A Director of the Company has offered to purchase the Debenture and this offer has been approved by certain equity owners of the Trust that holds the Debenture. The Director has also agreed to enter into a forbearance agreement with the Company with respect to payments due under the Debenture upon consummation of the Director’s purchase of the Debenture. Although the Director tendered the purchase price for the Debenture in 2014, the Trustee has received conflicting directions and therefore on December 11, 2014, the Trustee commenced an Action for Interpleader in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Interpleader Action”). On August 31, 2015, the court held that the Trustee could not sell the Debenture to the Director because certain conditions and requirements set forth in the indenture for the Trust had not been fulfilled. The Director has continued his efforts to acquire the Debenture. To date the Trustee has not accelerated the outstanding balance of the Debenture.
	In March of 2016, the Trustee received a direction from certain equity owners of the Trust that hold the Debenture to Sell the Debenture to a Director of the Company. Based upon the receipt of other conflicting directions, on August 26, 2016, the Trustee commenced an action in a Minnesota State Court seeking directions from the Court. On September 14, 2016, a Notice of Removal was filed and the case was removed to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. On October 10, 2016, the Trustee and the various Interested Parties filed a Stipulation to Transfer Venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Stipulation”). Based upon the Stipulation, on October 13, 2016, the Minnesota Federal Court entered its Order to Transfer Venue of the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The parties are seeking to have this matter assigned to the same District Court Judge who was assigned the Interpleader Action. To date no scheduling order has been entered. The Company continues to pursue mechanisms for paying the accrued interest, such as raising additional capital.
	Comprehensive (Loss) Income. Generally accepted accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net earnings (loss). Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the condensed consolidated balance sheet, such items along with net earnings (loss), are components of comprehensive (loss) earnings. The only component of other comprehensive (loss) income is the net change in the unrealized (loss) gain on the securities available for sale.
	Income Taxes. The Company assessed its earnings history and trends and estimates of future earnings, and determined that the deferred tax asset could not be realized as of September 30, 2016. Accordingly, a valuation allowance was recorded against the net deferred tax asset.
	(continued)

7 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(1)	General, Continued.
	Recent Pronouncements. In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which is intended to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information. The ASU requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair values recognized in net earnings, simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identity impairment and eliminates the requirement to disclose fair values, the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The ASU also clarifies that the Company should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available for-sale debt securities in combination with the Company’s other deferred tax assets. These amendments are effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
	In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-2, Leases (Topic 842) which will require lessees to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases with term of more than twelve months. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease.  The new ASU will require both types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet.  The ASU also will require disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements, providing additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements.  The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is in the process of determining the effect of the ASU on its consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations.  Early application will be permitted.
	In June 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13 Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326).  The ASU improves financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by the Company. The ASU requires the Company to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. The Company will continue to use judgment to determine which loss estimation method is appropriate for their circumstances. The ASU requires enhanced disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an organization’s portfolio. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements that provide additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. Additionally, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The ASU will take effect for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application will be permitted for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018.
	Reclassification. Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2016 financial statement presentation.
	Recent Regulatory Developments. Basel III Rules. On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) approved the final rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. banks. Under the final rules, minimum requirements will increase for both the quantity and quality of capital held by the Bank. The rules include a new common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 4.5% and a common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets. The final rules also raise the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0% to 6.0% and require a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%. The final rules also implement strict eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments. On July 9, 2013, the FDIC also approved, as an interim final rule, the regulatory capital requirements for U.S. banks, following the actions of the FRB. The FDIC’s rule is identical in substance to the final rules issued by the FRB. The phase-in period for the final rules began for the Bank on January 1, 2015, with full compliance with all of the final rule’s requirements phased in over a multi-year schedule. The provisions of the final rules are not expected to have a material impact on the Bank.

(continued)

8 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(2) Securities. Securities have been classified according to management’s intent. The carrying amount of securities and approximate fair values are as follows (in thousands):

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
At September 30, 2016:
Securities Available for Sale-
Mortgage-backed securities	$	3,288	$	50	$	—		$	3,338
Collateralized mortgage obligations		18,787		26		(220	)		18,593
Total	$	22,075	$	76	$	(220	)	$	21,931
At December 31, 2015:
Securities Available for Sale-
Mortgage-backed securities	$	10,107	$	31	$	(52	)	$	10,086
Collateralized mortgage obligations		15,223		21		(227	)		15,017
SBA Pool Security		644		2		—			646
Total	$	25,974	$	54	$	(279	)	$	25,749

The following summarizes the sales of securities (in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September 30
	2016			2015
Proceeds from sales of securities	$	18,028		$	8,255
Gross gains from sale of securities		66			87
Gross losses from sale of securities		(18	)		(27	)
Net gains from sales of securities	$	48		$	60

Securities with gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, is as follows (in thousands):

	At September 30, 2016
	Over Twelve Months					Less Than Twelve Months
	Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Securities Available for Sale-
Collateralized mortgage obligations	$	(13	)	$	942	$	(207	)	$	12,811

	At December 31, 2015
	Over Twelve Months				Less Than Twelve Months
	Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Securities Available for Sale:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	—	$	(52	)	$	5,526
Collateralized mortgage obligations		—		—		(227	)		11,783
	$	—	$	—	$	(279	)	$	17,309

(continued)

9 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(2)	Securities, Continued.  At September 30, 2016, the unrealized losses on eight investment securities were caused by market conditions. It is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the book value of the investments. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to market conditions and not credit quality, and because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.
	Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. A security is impaired if the fair value is less than its carrying value at the financial statement date. When a security is impaired, the Company determines whether this impairment is temporary or other-than-temporary. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses, management assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of these criteria is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized in operations. For securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment recognized in operations is limited to the amount related to credit losses, while impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). Management utilizes cash flow models to segregate impairments to distinguish between impairment related to credit losses and impairment related to other factors. To assess for OTTI, management considers, among other things, (i) the severity and duration of the impairment; (ii) the ratings of the security; (iii) the overall transaction structure (the Company’s position within the structure, the aggregate, near-term financial performance of the underlying collateral, delinquencies, defaults, loss severities, recoveries, prepayments, cumulative loss projections, and discounted cash flows); and (iv) the timing and magnitude of a break in modeled cash flows.
	In evaluating securities with unrealized losses, management utilizes various resources, including input from independent third-party firms to perform an analysis of expected future cash flows. The process begins with an assessment of the underlying collateral backing the mortgage pools. Management develops specific assumptions using as much market data as possible and includes internal estimates as well as estimates published by rating agencies and other third-party sources. The data for the individual borrowers in the underlying mortgage pools are generally segregated by state, FICO score at issue, loan to value at issue, and income documentation criteria. Mortgage pools are evaluated for current and expected levels of delinquencies and foreclosures, based on where they fall in the prescribed data set of FICO score, locations, LTV and documentation type, and a level of loss severity is assigned to each security based on its experience. The above-described historical data is used to develop current and expected measures of cumulative default rates as well as ultimate loss frequency and severity within the underlying mortgages. This reveals the expected future cash flows within the mortgage pool. The data described above is then input to an industry recognized model to assess the behavior of the particular security tranche owned by the Company. Significant inputs in this process include the structure of any subordination structures, if applicable, and are dictated by the structure of each particular security as laid out in the offering documents. The forecasted cash flows from the mortgage pools are input through the security structuring model to derive expected cash flows for the specific security owned by the Company to determine if the future cash flows are expected to exceed the book value of the security. The values for the significant inputs are updated on a regular basis. The Company did not record any OTTI losses for securities available for sale.
	(continued)

10 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(3) Loans.  The components of loans are as follows (in thousands):

	At September 30,			At December 31,
	2016			2015
Residential real estate	$	28,244		$	16,203
Multi-family real estate		5,789			3,697
Commercial real estate		31,405			34,771
Land and construction		4,096			5,258
Commercial		13,327			21,770
Consumer		2,098			3,015
Total loans		84,959			84,714
Add (deduct):
Net deferred loan fees, costs and premiums		542			154
Allowance for loan losses		(4,169	)		(2,295	)
Loans, net	$	81,332		$	82,573

(continued)

11 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(3) Loans, Continued. An analysis of the change in the allowance for loan losses follows (in thousands):

	Residential			Multi- Family			Commercial			Land
	Real			Real			Real			and
	Estate			Estate			Estate			Construction			Commercial			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016:
Beginning balance	$	262		$	39		$	1,012		$	64		$	200		$	156		$	2,507		$	4,240
Provision (credit) for loan losses		58			19			89			(4	)		48			75			(285	)		—
Charge-offs		—			—			(14	)		—			—			(72	)		—			(86	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			6			—			9			—			15
Ending balance	$	320		$	58		$	1,087		$	66		$	248		$	168		$	2,222		$	4,169
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016:
Beginning balance	$	116		$	26		$	1,085		$	77		$	120		$	151		$	720		$	2,295
Provision (credit) for loan losses		204			32			(2,033	)		(29	)		128			196			1,502			—
Charge-offs		—			—			(14	)		—			—			(195	)		—			(209	)
Recoveries		—			—			2,049			18			—			16			—			2,083
Ending balance	$	320			58			1,087			66			248			168			2,222			4,169
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015:
Beginning balance	$	48		$	25		$	1,408		$	34		$	77		$	147		$	440		$	2,179
Provision (credit) for loan losses		181			(14	)		(143	)		14			(36	)		19			(21	)		—
Charge-offs		(195	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(195	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			3			—			3
Ending balance	$	34		$	11		$	1,265		$	48		$	41		$	169		$	419		$	1,987
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015:
Beginning balance	$	66		$	2		$	1,794		$	99		$	17		$	—		$	266		$	2,244
Provision (credit) for loan losses		235			9			(529	)		(51	)		24			159			153			—
Charge-offs		(267	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(267	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			10			—			10
Ending balance	$	34		$	11		$	1,265		$	48		$	41		$	169		$	419		$	1,987

(continued)

 12

	Residential		Multi- Family		Commercial		Land
	Real		Real		Real		and
	Estate		Estate		Estate		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
At September 30, 2016:
Individually evaluated for impairment:
Recorded investment	$	379	$	—	$	2,129	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	2,508
Balance in allowance for loan losses	$	—	$	—	$	374	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	374
Collectively evaluated for impairment:
Recorded investment	$	27,865	$	5,789	$	29,276	$	4,096	$	13,327	$	2,098	$	—	$	82,451
Balance in allowance for loan losses	$	320	$	58	$	713	$	66	$	248	$	168	$	2,222	$	3,795
At December 31, 2015:
Individually evaluated for impairment:
Recorded investment	$	1,319	$	—	$	4,273	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	5,592
Balance in allowance for loan losses	$	—	$	—	$	13	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	13
Collectively evaluated for impairment:
Recorded investment	$	14,884	$	3,697	$	30,498	$	5,258	$	21,770	$	3,015	$	—	$	79,122
Balance in allowance for loan losses	$	116	$	26	$	1,072	$	77	$	120	$	151	$	720	$	2,282

(continued)

 13

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(3)	Loans, Continued. Residential Real Estate, Multi-Family Real Estate, Commercial Real Estate, Land and Construction. All loans are underwritten in accordance with policies set forth and approved by the Board of Directors (the “Board”), including repayment capacity and source, value of the underlying property, credit history and stability. Multi-family and commercial real estate loans are secured by the subject property and are underwritten based upon standards set forth in the policies approved by the Company’s Board. Such standards include, among other factors, loan to value limits, cash flow coverage and general creditworthiness of the obligors. Construction loans to borrowers finance the construction of owner occupied and leased properties. These loans are categorized as construction loans during the construction period, later converting to commercial or residential real estate loans after the construction is complete and amortization of the loan begins. Real estate development and construction loans are approved based on an analysis of the borrower and guarantor, the viability of the project and on an acceptable percentage of the appraised value of the property securing the loan. Real estate development and construction loan funds are disbursed periodically based on the percentage of construction completed. The Company carefully monitors these loans with on-site inspections and requires the receipt of lien waivers on funds advanced. Development and construction loans are typically secured by the properties under development or construction, and personal guarantees are typically obtained. Further, to assure that reliance is not placed solely on the value of the underlying property, the Company considers the market conditions and feasibility of proposed projects, the financial condition and reputation of the borrower and guarantors, the amount of the borrower’s equity in the project, independent appraisals, cost estimates and pre-construction sales information. The Company also makes loans on occasion for the purchase of land for future development by the borrower. Land loans are extended for future development for either commercial or residential use by the borrower. The Company carefully analyzes the intended use of the property and the viability thereof.
	Commercial. Commercial business loans and lines of credit consist of loans to small- and medium-sized companies in the Company’s market area. Commercial loans are generally used for working capital purposes or for acquiring equipment, inventory or furniture. Primarily all of the Company’s commercial loans are secured loans, along with a small amount of unsecured loans. The Company’s underwriting analysis consists of a review of the financial statements of the borrower, the lending history of the borrower, the debt service capabilities of the borrower, the projected cash flows of the business, the value of the collateral, if any, and whether the loan is guaranteed by the principals of the borrower. These loans are generally secured by accounts receivable, inventory and equipment. Commercial loans are typically made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business, which makes them of higher risk than residential loans and the collateral securing loans may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. The Company seeks to minimize these risks through its underwriting standards.
	Consumer. Consumer loans are extended for various purposes, including purchases of automobiles, recreational vehicles, and boats. Also offered are home improvement loans, lines of credit, personal loans, and deposit account collateralized loans. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels. Loans to consumers are extended after a credit evaluation, including the creditworthiness of the borrower(s), the purpose of the credit, and the secondary source of repayment. Consumer loans are made at fixed and variable interest rates. Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts.

(continued)

 14

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(3) Loans, Continued. The following summarizes the loan credit quality (in thousands):

		Pass		OLEM (Other Loans Especially Mentioned)		Sub- standard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
At September 30, 2016:
Residential real estate	$	26,226	$	1,639	$	379	$	—	$	—	$	28,244
Multi-family real estate		5,789		—		—		—		—		5,789
Commercial real estate		27,000		1,187		3,218		—		—		31,405
Land and construction		4,050		46		—		—		—		4,096
Commercial		11,582		—		1,745		—		—		13,327
Consumer		2,098		—		—		—		—		2,098
Total	$	76,745	$	2,872	$	5,342	$	—	$	—	$	84,959
At December 31, 2015:
Residential real estate	$	15,132	$	—	$	1,071	$	—	$	—	$	16,203
Multi-family real estate		3,697		—		—		—		—		3,697
Commercial real estate		29,925		573		4,273		—		—		34,771
Land and construction		5,212		46		—		—		—		5,258
Commercial		19,916		—		1,854		—		—		21,770
Consumer		3,015		—		—		—		—		3,015
Total	$	76,897	$	619	$	7,198	$	—	$	—	$	84,714

 

Pass – a Pass loan’s primary source of loan repayment is satisfactory, with secondary sources very likely to be realized if necessary. These are loans that conform in all aspects to bank policy and regulatory requirements, and no repayment risk has been identified.

OLEM (Other Loans Especially Mentioned) – an Other Loan Especially Mentioned has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in the deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or the Company’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard – a Substandard loan is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. Included in this category are loans that are current on their payments, but the Bank is unable to document the source of repayment. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful – a loan classified as Doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified as Substandard, with the added characteristics that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this basically worthless asset even though partial recovery may be affected in the future. The Company charges off any loan classified as Doubtful.

Loss – a loan classified Loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as a bankable asset is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this basically worthless asset even though partial recovery may be affected in the future. The Company fully charges off any loan classified as Loss.

(continued)

15 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(3) Loans, Continued. Age analysis of past-due loans is as follows (in thousands):

		Accruing Loans
		30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Nonaccrual Loans		Total Loans
At September 30, 2016:
Residential real estate	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	27,865	$	379	$	28,244
Multi-family real estate		—		—		—		—		5,789		—		5,789
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		30,287		1,118		31,405
Land and construction		—		—		—		—		4,096		—		4,096
Commercial		—		—		—		—		13,327		—		13,327
Consumer		—		—		—		—		2,098		—		2,098
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	83,462	$	1,497	$	84,959
At December 31, 2015:
Residential real estate	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	15,132	$	1,071	$	16,203
Multi-family real estate		—		—		—		—		3,697		—		3,697
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		31,539		3,232		34,771
Land and construction		—		—		—		—		5,258		—		5,258
Commercial		—		—		—		—		21,770		—		21,770
Consumer		—		—		—		—		3,015		—		3,015
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	80,411	$	4,303	$	84,714

The following summarizes the amount of impaired loans (in thousands):

	At September 30, 2016						At December 31, 2015
		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential real estate	$	379	$	684	$	—	$	1,319	$	2,243	$	—
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		3,232		6,584		—
With related allowance recorded -
Commercial real estate	$	2,129	$	2,292		374		1,041		1,041		13
Total
Residential real estate	$	379	$	684	$	—	$	1,319	$	2,243	$	—
Commercial real estate	$	2,129	$	2,292	$	374	$	4,273	$	7,625	$	13
Total	$	2,508	$	2,976	$	374	$	5,592	$	9,868	$	13

(continued)

16 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(3) Loans, Continued. The average net investment in impaired loans and interest income recognized and received on impaired loans are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2016						2015
	Average		Interest		Interest		Average		Interest		Interest
	Recorded		Income		Income		Recorded		Income		Income
	Investment		Recognized		Received		Investment		Recognized		Received
Residential real estate	$	598	$	3	$	16	$	4,532	$	35	$	58
Commercial real estate	$	1,829	$	16	$	22	$	4,898	$	18	$	65
Total	$	2,427	$	19	$	38	$	9,430	$	53	$	123

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016						2015
	Average		Interest		Interest		Average		Interest		Interest
	Recorded		Income		Income		Recorded		Income		Income
	Investment		Recognized		Received		Investment		Recognized		Received
Residential real estate	$	1,057	$	36	$	64	$	5,367	$	104	$	211
Commercial real estate	$	2,483	$	63	$	89	$	5,074	$	57	$	215
Total	$	3,540	$	99	$	153	$	10,441	$	161	$	426

No loans have been determined to be troubled debt restructurings during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 or 2015.

(4) Regulatory Capital. The Bank is required to maintain certain minimum regulatory capital requirements. The following is a summary at September 30, 2016 of the regulatory capital requirements and the Bank’s capital on a percentage basis:

	Bank			Consent Order Regulatory Requirement
Tier I capital to total average assets		7.78	%		8.00	%
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets		11.07	%		N/A
Common equity Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets		11.07	%		N/A
Total capital to risk-weighted assets		12.37	%		12.00	%

At September 30, 2016, the Bank is well-capitalized. As a result of the Consent Order discussed in Note 9, the Bank cannot be categorized higher than “adequately capitalized” until the Consent Order is lifted, even if its ratios were to exceed those required to be a “well capitalized” bank.

(continued)

17 

(5) Earnings (Loss) Per Share. Basic earnings (loss) per share has been computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Earnings (loss) per common share have been computed based on the following (weighted-average number of common shares outstanding have been adjusted for the reverse stock split discussed in note 11):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share		1,097,644		955,802		1,024,704		951,977

(continued)

18 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(6)

Stock-Based Compensation.  On December 27, 2011, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (“2011 Plan”). In May 2016, the Company increased the total number of shares available to be awarded from 105,000 shares (adjusted for the one-for-ten reverse stock split) to 210,000 shares. Options, restricted stock, performance share awards and bonus share awards in lieu of obligations may be issued under the 2011 Plan. Both incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options can be granted under the 2011 Plan. The exercise price of the stock options cannot be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Options must be exercised within ten years of the date of grant.

As of September 30, 2016, only common stock has been issued as compensation to directors for services rendered under this plan. 7,559 and 25,112 shares of common stock (adjusted for one-for-ten reverse stock split) were issued for the periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. A total of $32,000 and $229,000 of compensation was recorded during the 2016 and 2015 periods. At September 30, 2016 a total of 149,482 (adjusted for one-for-ten reverse stock split) shares remain available for grant.

(7) Fair Value Measurements.  Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are as follows (in thousands):

											Losses
	Fair								Total		Recorded in
	Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Losses		Operations
At September 30, 2016:
Residential real estate	$	379	$	—	$	—	$	379	$	125	$	—
Commercial real estate		850		—		—		850		268	$	268
	$	1,229	$	—	$	—	$	1,229	$	393	$	268
Foreclosed real estate	$	2,412	$	—	$	—	$	2,412	$	1,118	$	—
At December 31, 2015:
Residential real estate	$	423	$	—	$	—	$	423	$	125	$	—
Commercial real estate		2,094		—		—		2,094		2,055		—
	$	2,517	$	—	$	—	$	2,517	$	2,180	$	—
Foreclosed real estate	$	4,029	$	—	$	—	$	4,029	$	1,403	$	260

(continued)

19 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(8) Fair Value of Financial Instruments.  The estimated fair values and fair value measurement method with respect to the Company’s financial instruments were as follows (in thousands):

	At September 30, 2016							At December 31, 2015
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value			Level		Carrying Amount		Fair Value			Level
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	11,440	$	11,440			1	$	10,365	$	10,365			1
Securities available for sale		21,931		21,931			2		25,749		25,749			2
Loans		81,332		81,419			3		82,573		82,429			3
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,018		1,018			3		966		966			3
Accrued interest receivable		389		389			3		462		462			3
Financial liabilities:
Deposit liabilities		90,308		90,647			3		97,571		97,837			3
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		20,500		20,544			3		20,000		20,000			3
Junior subordinated debenture		5,155		N/A	(1)		3		5,155		N/A	(1)		3
Off-balance sheet financial instruments		—		—			—		—		—			3

(1) The Company is unable to determine value based on significant unobservable inputs required in the calculation. Refer to Note 10 for further information.

	Discussion regarding the assumptions used to compute the estimated fair values of financial instruments can be found in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
(9)	Regulatory Matters. The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the bank regulatory agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company and Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of its assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
	Effective January 1, 2015, the Bank, became subject to the new Basel III capital level threshold requirements under the Prompt Corrective Action regulations with full compliance with all of the final rule’s requirements phased in over a multi-year schedule. These new regulations were designed to ensure that banks maintain strong capital positions even in the event of severe economic downturns or unforeseen losses.
	Changes that could affect the Bank going forward include additional constraints on the inclusion of deferred tax assets in capital and increased risk weightings for nonperforming loans and acquisition/development loans in regulatory capital. Under the new regulations in the first quarter of 2015, the Bank elected an irreversible one-time opt-out to exclude accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from regulatory capital.

(continued)

20 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(9) Regulatory Matters, Continued.  As of September 30, 2016, the Bank is subject to a Consent Order issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation (“OFR”), and accordingly is deemed to be “adequately capitalized” even if its capital ratios were to exceed those generally required to be a “well capitalized” bank. An institution must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the following tables. The Bank’s actual capital amounts and percentages are also presented in the table (dollars in thousands):   The following table shows the Bank’s capital amounts and ratios and regulatory thresholds at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in thousands):  

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					Minimum To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions					Requirements of Consent Order
	Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%
As of September 30, 2016:
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	$	10,564		12.37	%	$	6,832		8.0	%	$	8,540		10.0	%	$	10,248		12.0	%
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,458		11.07			5,124		6.0			6,832		8.0			N/A		N/A
Common equity Tier I capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,458		11.07			3,843		4.5			5,551		6.5			N/A		N/A
Tier I Capital to Total Assets		9,458		7.78			4,865		4.0			6,081		5.0			9,730		8.0
As of December 31, 2015:
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	$	10,319		11.40	%	$	7,240		8.0	%	$	9,050		10.0	%	$	10,860		12.0	%
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,173		10.14			5,430		6.0			7,240		8.0			N/A		N/A
Common equity Tier I capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,173		10.14			4,073		4.5			5,883		6.5			N/A		N/A
Tier I Capital to Total Assets		9,173		7.59			4,836		4.0			6,045		5.0			9,672		8.0

Regulatory Enforcement Actions

Bank Consent Order. On April 16, 2010, the Bank agreed to the issuance of the Consent Order by the FDIC and the OFR (the “Original Consent Order”), which was amended on February 28, 2014. Under the Original Consent Order, the Bank was required to take certain measures to improve its capital position, reduce its level of problem assets, reduce its loan concentrations in certain portfolios, improve management practices and board supervision and assure that its reserve for loan losses is maintained at an appropriate level. The Original Consent Order required the Bank to maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 8% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 12%. At September 30, 2016, the Bank had a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 7.78%, and a total risk-based capital ratio of 12.37%.

See Footnote 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s 2015 Form 10-K for additional information concerning the requirements of the Original Consent Order.

During the second quarter of 2016, the Bank was notified by the FDIC and the OFR that the Bank had not complied with certain of the terms of the Original Consent Order, and that the Bank continues to exhibit weaknesses in its level of capital, loan quality, earnings, liquidity and sensitivity to market risks. The FDIC and OFR also noted issues related to the management of the Bank, including issues with capital adequacy, risk management, loan concentrations, operating deficits, compliance with the Original Consent Order, weaknesses in the Bank’s customer related due diligence, insider conflicts of interest and regulatory compliance.

(continued)

21 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

On November 2, 2016, at the request of the FDIC and the OFR, the Bank agreed to the entry of a new Consent Order to be issued by the FDIC and the OFR (the “New Order”). The New Order will become effective when issued by the FDIC and the OFR.

The New Order addresses many of the issues addressed in the Original Consent Order, as well as issues related to board supervision and composition, management composition, asset quality, lending practices, allowance for loan losses, asset growth, and compliance with the Bank Secrecy act and related regulations. The New Order will continue to restrict the ability of the Bank to pay dividends.

Management believes that the Bank has made substantial progress in improving its financial condition through a significant reduction in non-performing assets and the receipt of capital increases from investors since the date of the Original Consent Order. The Bank is also seeking to address the other issues raised by the FDIC and the OFR, although the Bank has been hampered by difficulties in raising capital due to the default under the Debenture and the limits placed on the Company and the Bank under the Original Consent Order and the Written Agreement. Management intends to continue its efforts to meet the conditions of the New Consent Order and the Written Agreement.

Company Written Agreement with Reserve Bank. On June 22, 2010, the Company and the Reserve Bank entered into a Written Agreement with respect to certain aspects of the operation and management of the Company The Written Agreement prohibits, without the prior approval of the Reserve Bank, the payment of dividends, taking dividends or payments from the Bank, making any interest, principal or other distributions on trust preferred securities (including the Debenture), incurring, increasing or guaranteeing any debt, purchasing or redeeming any shares of stock, or appointing any new director or senior executive officer. Management believes that the Company is in substantial compliance with the requirements of the Written Agreement.

(10)	Junior Subordinated Debenture.  On September 30, 2004, the Company issued a $5,155,000 junior subordinated debenture to an unconsolidated subsidiary (the “Debenture”). The Debenture has a term of thirty years. The interest rate was fixed at 6.4% for the first five years, and thereafter, the coupon rate floats quarterly at the three-month LIBOR rate plus 2.45% (3.13% at September 30, 2016). The Debenture is redeemable in certain circumstances. The terms of the Debenture allow the Company to defer payments of interest on the Debenture by extending the interest payment period at any time during the term of the Debenture for up to twenty consecutive quarterly periods. Beginning in 2010, the Company exercised its right to defer payment of interest on the Debenture. Interest payments deferred as of September 30, 2016 totaled $1,095,700. The Company has deferred interest payments with respect to the Debenture for the maximum allowable twenty consecutive quarterly payments. The holder of the Debenture can accelerate the $5,155,000 principal balance as a result of this default. Under the Written Agreement, the Company is not able to make these interest payments without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Regulatory approval to pay accrued and unpaid interest has been denied.
	A Director of the Company has offered to purchase the Debenture and this offer has been approved by certain equity owners of the Trust that holds the Debenture. The Director has also agreed to enter into a forbearance agreement with the Company with respect to payments due under the Debenture upon consummation of the Director’s purchase of the debenture. Although the Director tendered the purchase price for the Debenture in 2014, the Trustee has received conflicting directions and therefore on December 11, 2014, the Trustee commenced an Action for Interpleader in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On August 31, 2015, the court held that the Trustee could not sell the Debenture to the Director because certain conditions and requirements set forth in the indenture for the Trust had not been fulfilled. The Director has continued his efforts to acquire the Debenture.  To date the Trustee has not accelerated the outstanding balance of the debenture.
	In March of 2016, the Trustee received a direction from certain equity owners of the Trust that hold the Debenture to Sell the Debenture to a Director of the Company. Based upon the receipt of other conflicting directions, on August 26, 2016, the Trustee commenced an action in a Minnesota State Court seeking directions from the Court. On September 14, 2016, a Notice of Removal was filed and the case was removed to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. On October 10, 2016, the Trustee and the various Interested Parties filed a Stipulation to Transfer Venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Stipulation”). Based upon the Stipulation, on October 13, 2016, the Minnesota Federal Court entered its Order to Transfer Venue of the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The parties are seeking to have this matter assigned to the same District Court Judge who was assigned the Interpleader Action. To date no schedule order has been entered. The Company continues to pursue mechanisms for paying the accrued interest, such as raising additional capital.
(11)	Reverse Common Stock Split.  Effective January 11, 2016 each ten shares of the Company’s common stock were converted into one share of common stock. Earnings (loss) per share for 2016 and 2015 has been adjusted to reflect the 1-for-10 reverse common stock split.
(12)	Loan Loss Recovery.  On January 6, 2016, the Bank completed a sale of judgement on a defaulted credit that resulted in a $1.8 million recovery of previously charged-off amounts to the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (“ALLL”). This increases the balance of the ALLL to approximately $4.2 million. On February 12, 2016, and amended May 6, 2016, pursuant to the terms and requirements of the Consent Order, Management submitted a written request to the FDIC for a partial reversal of the ALLL. As of this date, no response from the FDIC has been received and management does not expect a response until the next safety and soundness examination which is expected to be performed in first and second quarters of 2017.
(13)	Reclassification.  During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Company agreed to issue 46,296 shares to the Bank’s Chairman as compensation. The Company recorded compensation expense of $200,000 based on the fair market value of the shares at that time, and reflected the issuance of the shares as an increase in stockholders’ equity. The Bank’s Chairman has not yet taken delivery of the shares. As a result, during the quarter ended September 30, 2016, the Company determined to reclassify the transaction as a liability of the Company (rather than an increase in stockholders’ equity) until the issuance of the shares. The reclassification had no effect on the Company’s net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 or the quarter ended September 30, 2016.

(continued)

22 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto presented elsewhere in this report. For additional information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes for the year ended December 31, 2015 in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

The following discussion and analysis should also be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, including adverse changes in economic, political and market conditions, losses from the Company’s lending activities and changes in market conditions, the possible loss of key personnel, the impact of increasing competition, the impact of changes in government regulation, the possibility of liabilities arising from violations of federal and state securities laws and the impact of changes in technology in the banking industry. Although the Company believes that its forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions regarding its business and future market conditions, there can be no assurances that the Company’s actual results will not differ materially from any results expressed or implied by the Company’s forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Readers are cautioned that any forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance.

Regulatory Enforcement Actions

Bank Consent Order. On April 16, 2010, the Bank agreed to the issuance of the Consent Order by the FDIC and the OFR (the “Original Consent Order”), which was amended on February 28, 2014. Under the Original Consent Order, the Bank was required to take certain measures to improve its capital position, reduce its level of problem assets, reduce its loan concentrations in certain portfolios, improve management practices and board supervision and assure that its reserve for loan losses is maintained at an appropriate level. The Original Consent Order required the Bank to maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 8% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 12%. At September 30, 2016, the Bank had a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 7.78%, and a total risk-based capital ratio of 12.37%.

See Footnote 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s 2015 Form 10-K for additional information concerning the requirements of the Original Consent Order.

During the second quarter of 2016, the Bank was notified by the FDIC and the OFR that the Bank had not complied with certain of the terms of the Original Consent Order, and that the Bank continues to exhibit weaknesses in its level of capital, loan quality, earnings, liquidity and sensitivity to market risks. The FDIC and OFR also noted issues related to the management of the Bank, including issues with capital adequacy, risk management, loan concentrations, operating deficits, compliance with the Original Consent Order, weaknesses in the Bank’s customer related due diligence, insider conflicts of interest and regulatory compliance.

On November 2, 2016, at the request of the FDIC and the OFR, the Bank agreed to the entry of a new Consent Order to be issued by the FDIC and the OFR (the “New Order”). The New Order will become effective when issued by the FDIC and the OFR.

The New Order addresses many of the issues addressed in the Original Consent Order, as well as issues related to board supervision and composition, management composition, asset quality, lending practices, allowance for loan losses, asset growth, and compliance with the Bank Secrecy act and related regulations. The New Order will continue to restrict the ability of the Bank to pay dividends.

Management believes that the Bank has made substantial progress in improving its financial condition through a significant reduction in non-performing assets and the receipt of capital increases from investors since the date of the Original Consent Order. The Bank is also seeking to address the other issues raised by the FDIC and the OFR, although the Bank has been hampered by difficulties in raising capital due to the default under the Debenture and the limits placed on the Company and the Bank under the Original Consent Order and the Written Agreement. Management intends to continue its efforts to meet the conditions of the New Consent Order and the Written Agreement.

Company Written Agreement with Reserve Bank. On June 22, 2010, the Company and the Reserve Bank entered into a Written Agreement with respect to certain aspects of the operation and management of the Company The Written Agreement prohibits, without the prior approval of the Reserve Bank, the payment of dividends, taking dividends or payments from the Bank, making any interest, principal or other distributions on trust preferred securities (including the Debenture), incurring, increasing or guaranteeing any debt, purchasing or redeeming any shares of stock, or appointing any new director or senior executive officer. Management believes that the Company is in substantial compliance with the requirements of the Written Agreement.

Capital Levels

Quantitative measures established by regulation and by the Consent Order to ensure capital adequacy require us to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of Total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and Tier 1 capital to average assets. As of September 30, 2016, the Bank met the minimum applicable capital adequacy requirements for Total Capital to Risk – Weighted Assets, but did not meet the requirement for Tier I Capital to Total Assets.

23 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, (Continued)

The Bank’s actual and required minimum capital ratios were as follows (in thousands):

Regulatory Capital Requirements

											Minimum
											To Be Well
											Capitalized Under
											Prompt
						For Capital					Corrective					Requirements of
	Actual					Adequacy Purposes					Action Provisions					Consent Order
	Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%
As of September 30, 2016:
Total Capital to Risk- Weighted Assets	$	10,564		12.37	%	$	6,832		8.0	%	$	8,540		10.0	%	$	10,248		12.0	%
Tier I Capital to Risk- Weighted Assets		9,458		11.07			5,124		6.0			6,832		8.0			N/A		N/A
Common equity Tier I capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,458		11.07			3,843		4.5			5,551		6.5			N/A		N/A
Tier I Capital to Total Assets		9,458		7.78			4,865		4.0			6,081		5.0			9,730		8.0
As of December 31, 2015:
Total Capital to Risk- Weighted Assets	$	10,319		11.40	%	$	7,240		8.0	%	$	9,050		10.0	%	$	10,860		12.0	%
Tier I Capital to Risk- Weighted Assets		9,173		10.14			5,430		6.0			7,240		8.0			N/A		N/A
Common equity Tier I capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,173		10.14			4,073		4.5			5,883		6.5			N/A		N/A
Tier I Capital to Total Assets		9,173		7.59			4,836		4.0			6,045		5.0			9,672		8.0

24 

Financial Condition at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015

Overview

The Bank’s total assets decreased by $5.8 million to $121.7 million at September 30, 2016, from $127.5 million at December 31, 2015, primarily due to a reduction in total loans and total deposits. Total stockholders’ equity increased approximately $350,000 at September 30, 2016 from $2,967,000 at December 31, 2015 to $3,317,000. The increase was due to an unrealized OCI gain of $48,000, the issuance of $32,000 of common stock as compensation to directors, the issuance of $128,000 of common stock for services, and the sale of $450,000 in common and preferred stock to investors, which offset the net loss of $308,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

The following table shows selected information for the periods ended or at the dates indicated:

	Nine Months			Nine Months			Year
	Ended			Ended			Ended
	September 30,			September 30,			December 31,
	2016			2015			2015
Average equity as a percentage of average assets		2.59	%		2.41	%		2.45	%
Equity to total assets at end of period		2.73	%		2.66	%		2.33	%
Return on average assets (1)		(0.34	)%		(0.14	)%		(0.13	)%
Return on average equity (1)		(12.96	)%		(5.69	)%		(5.33	)%
Noninterest expenses to average assets (1)		3.51	%		3.70	%		3.64	%

(1) Annualized for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.

25 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, (Continued)

Liquidity and Sources of Funds

The Bank’s sources of funds include customer deposits, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”), principal repayments and sales of investment securities, loan repayments, foreclosed real estate sales, the use of Federal Funds markets, net earnings, if any, and loans taken out at the Federal Reserve Bank discount window.

Deposits are our primary source of funds. In order to increase its core deposits, the Bank has priced its deposit rates competitively. The Bank will adjust rates on its deposits to attract or retain deposits as needed. Under the Consent Order, the interest rate that the Bank pays on its market area deposits is restricted. It is possible that the Bank could experience a decrease in deposit inflows, or the migration of current deposits to competitor institutions, if other institutions offer higher interest rates than those permitted to be offered by the Bank. Despite these yield limitations, we believe that we have the ability to adjust rates on our deposits to attract or retain deposits as needed.

In addition to obtaining funds from depositors, we may borrow funds from other financial institutions. At September 30, 2016, the Bank had outstanding borrowings of $20,500,000, against its $31,700,000 in established borrowing capacity with the FHLB. The Bank’s borrowing facility is subject to collateral and stock ownership requirements, as well as prior FHLB consent to each advance. In 2010, the Bank obtained an available discount window credit line with the Federal Reserve Bank, currently $788,200. The Federal Reserve Bank line is subject to collateral requirements and must be repaid within 90 days; each advance is subject to prior Federal Reserve Bank consent. The Bank also has a $2.5 million line of credit with SunTrust, $750,000 line of credit with Servis First Bank and a $2,500,000 line of credit with AloStar Bank. We measure and monitor our liquidity daily and believe our liquidity sources are adequate to meet our operating needs.

In the past, the Company, on an unconsolidated basis, relied on dividends from the Bank to fund its operating expenses, primarily expenses of being publicly held, and to make interest payments on the Company’s junior subordinated debenture (the “Debenture”). Under the Consent Order, the Bank is currently unable to pay dividends to the Company without prior regulatory approval. Additionally, under the Written Agreement, the Company may not pay interest payments on the Debenture or dividends on the Company’s common stock, incur any additional indebtedness at the Company level, or redeem the Company’s common stock without the prior regulatory approval of the Federal Reserve Bank. Since January 2010, the Company has deferred interest payments on the Debenture, which has been in default since 2015. See “Junior Subordinated Debenture” below.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments are commitments to extend credit and may involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest-rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The contract amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of the Company’s involvement in these financial instruments.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total committed amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis.

The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counter party. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had commitments to extend credit totaling $1.2 million.

26 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, (Continued)

Junior Subordinated Debenture

On September 30, 2004, the Company issued a $5,155,000 junior subordinated debenture to an unconsolidated subsidiary (the “Debenture”). The Debenture has a term of thirty years. The interest rate was fixed at 6.4% for the first five years, and thereafter, the coupon rate floats quarterly at the three-month LIBOR rate plus 2.45% (3.13% at September 30, 2016). The Debenture is redeemable in certain circumstances. The terms of the Debenture allow the Company to defer payments of interest on the Debenture by extending the interest payment period at any time during the term of the Debenture for up to twenty consecutive quarterly periods. Beginning in 2010, the Company exercised its right to defer payment of interest on the Debenture. Interest payments deferred as of September 30, 2016 totaled $1,095,700. The Company has deferred interest payments with respect to the Debenture for the maximum allowable twenty consecutive quarterly payments. The holder of the Debenture can accelerate the $5,155,000 principal balance as a result of this default. Under the Written Agreement, the Company is not able to make these interest payments without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Regulatory approval to pay accrued and unpaid interest has been denied.

A Director of the Company has offered to purchase the Debenture and this offer has been approved by certain equity owners of the Trust that holds the Debenture. The Director has also agreed to enter into a forbearance agreement with the Company with respect to payments due under the Debenture upon consummation of the Director’s purchase of the debenture. Although the Director tendered the purchase price for the Debenture in 2014, the Trustee has received conflicting directions and therefore on December 11, 2014, the Trustee commenced an Action for Interpleader in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On August 31, 2015, the court held that the Trustee could not sell the Debenture to the Director because certain conditions and requirements set forth in the indenture for the Trust had not been fulfilled. The Director has continued his efforts to acquire the Debenture. To date, the Trustee has not accelerated the outstanding balance of the debenture.

In March of 2016, the Trustee received a direction from certain equity owners of the Trust that hold the Debenture to Sell the Debenture to a Director of the Company. Based upon the receipt of other conflicting directions, on August 26, 2016, the Trustee commenced an action in a Minnesota State Court seeking directions from the court. On September 14, 2016, a Notice of removal was filed and the case was removed to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. On October 10, 2016, the Trustee and the various Interested Parties filed a Stipulation to Transfer Venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Stipulation”). Based upon the Stipulation, on October 13, 2016, the Minnesota Federal Court entered its Order to Transfer Venue of the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The parties are seeking to have this matter assigned to the same District Court Judge who was assigned the Interpleader Action. To date no schedule order has been entered. The Company continues to pursue mechanisms for paying the accrued interest, such as raising additional capital.

In the event the amounts due under the Debenture were accelerated, then the Trustee could undertake legal proceedings to obtain a judgment against the Company with respect to such amounts due under the Debenture. If this action were successful, then the Trustee could seek to affect a sale of the Bank to pay the amounts due under the Debenture.

27 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, (Continued)

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, information regarding (i) the total dollar amount of interest and dividend income of the Company from interest-earning assets and the resultant average yields; (ii) the total dollar amount of interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities and the resultant average cost; (iii) net interest income; (iv) interest-rate spread; (v) net interest margin; and (vi) ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities. 

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2016								2015
	Average Balance			Interest and Dividends		Average Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Interest and Dividends		Average Yield/ Rate
	($ in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	85,020		$	1,082		5.09	%	$	81,570	$	974		4.78	%
Securities		22,779			117		2.05			25,804		148		2.29
Other (1)		11,225			24		0.86			994		20		0.80
Total interest-earning assets/interest income		119,024			1,223		4.11			108,368		1,142		4.22
Cash and due from banks		910								10,242
Premise and equipment		2,696								2,768
Other		(1,005	)							3,047
Total assets	$	121,625							$	124,425
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings, NOW and money-market deposits	$	22,960			29		0.51		$	24,521		31		0.51
Time deposits		59,069			152		1.03			61,836		131		0.85
Borrowings (2)		25,663			91		1.42			20,331		60		1.81
Total interest-bearing liabilities/ interest expense		107,692			272		1.01			106,688		222		0.83
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		8,039								7,219
Other liabilities		2,534								7,473
Stockholders’ equity		3,360								3,045
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	121,625							$	124,425
Net interest income				$	951						$	920
Interest-rate spread (3)							3.10	%						3.39	%
Net interest margin (4)							3.20	%						3.40	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		1.11								1.02

(1)	Includes interest-earning deposits with banks and Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends.
(2)	Includes Federal Home Loan Bank advances, other borrowings and junior subordinated debenture.
(3)	Interest-rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(4)	Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

28 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, (Continued)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016								2015
	Average Balance			Interest and Dividends		Average Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Interest and Dividends		Average Yield/ Rate
						($ in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	84,173		$	3,156		5.00	%	$	81,342	$	2,828		4.64	%
Securities		23,454			367		2.09			26,839		455		2.26
Other (1)		11,433			75		0.87			1,601		58		4.83
Total interest-earning assets/interest income		119,060			3,598		4.03			109,782		3,341		4.06
Cash and due from banks		887								9,256
Premise and equipment		2,694								2,795
Other		(393	)							4,480
Total assets	$	122,248							$	126,313
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings, NOW and money-market deposits	$	23,719			89		0.50		$	24,874		93		0.50
Time deposits		62,203			461		0.99			60,295		386		0.85
Borrowings (2)		25,700			260		1.35			25,476		176		0.92
Total interest-bearing liabilities/ interest expense		111,622			810		0.97			110,645		655		0.79
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		5,249								8,574
Other liabilities		2,208								4,047
Stockholders’ equity		3,169								3,047
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	122,248							$	126,313
Net interest income				$	2,788						$	2,686
Interest-rate spread (3)							3.06	%						3.27	%
Net interest margin (4)							3.12	%						3.26	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		1.07								0.99

(1)	Includes interest-earning deposits with banks and Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends.
(2)	Includes Federal Home Loan Bank advances, other borrowings and junior subordinated debenture.
(3)	Interest-rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(4)	Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

29 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, (Continued)

Comparison of the Three-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015

General. Net earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2016, was $22,000 or $0.02 per basic and diluted share compared to net earnings of $46,000 or $0.05 per basic and diluted share for the three months ended September 30, 2015. This decrease in net earnings was due to a combination of higher loan interest income, lower non-interest income and lower expenses associated with foreclosed real estate. During September 30, 2015, the bank recognized a reversal of previously recorded income tax expense.

Interest Income. Interest income increased to $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 from $1.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 due primarily to an increase in interest earnings assets.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased to $272,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 from $222,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, due to higher interest paid on deposits and an increase in borrowing during 2016.

Provision for Loan Losses. There was no provision for the three months ended September 30, 2016 or September 30, 2015. The provision for loan losses is charged to operations in order to bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management to absorb losses inherent in the portfolio. Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based upon historical experience, the volume and type of lending conducted by us, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of the underlying collateral, loans identified as impaired, general economic conditions, particularly as they relate to our market areas, and other factors related to the estimated collectability of our loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses totaled $4.2 million or 4.91% of loans outstanding at September 30, 2016, compared to $2.3 million, or 2.71% of loans outstanding at September 30, 2015. See Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Noninterest Income. Total noninterest income decreased to $31,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $172,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease was due to nonrecurring loan fees recognized in 2015.

Noninterest Expenses. Total noninterest expenses decreased to $960,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as a result of lower expenses on foreclosed real estate.

Income Tax Benefit. The income tax benefit resulted from the favorable settlement of a dispute with the IRS related to certain of the Company’s Federal income tax returns.

Comparison of the Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015

General. Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, was $(308,000) or $(0.30) loss per basic and diluted share compared to a net loss of $(130,000) or $(.12) loss per basic and diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in net loss was due to a combination of higher interest income, lower non-interest income and lower expenses associated with foreclosed real estate. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the bank recognized a reversal of previously recorded income tax expense.

Interest Income. Interest income increased to $3,599,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from $3,341,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to an increase in interest earnings assets.

Interest Expense. Interest expense on deposits and borrowings increased to $810,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from $655,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Interest expense increased primarily due to higher interest paid on deposits and borrowing during 2016.

Provision for Loan Losses. There was no provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 or 2015. The provision for loan losses is charged to operations in order to bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management to absorb losses inherent in the portfolio. Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based upon historical experience, the volume and type of lending conducted by us, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of the underlying collateral, loans identified as impaired, general economic conditions, particularly as they relate to our market areas, and other factors related to the estimated collectability of our loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses totaled $4.2 million or 4.91% of loans outstanding at September 30, 2016, compared to $2.3 million, or 2.71% of loans outstanding at September 30, 2015. See Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

30 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, (Continued)

Noninterest Income. Total noninterest income decreased to $125,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $372,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 primarily due to nonrecurring loan fees recognized in 2015.

Noninterest Expenses. Total noninterest expenses decreased to $3,221,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $3,508,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to reduction in expenses for foreclosed real estate.  

Income Tax Benefit. The income tax benefit resulted from the favorable settlement of a dispute with the IRS related to certain of the Company’s Federal income tax returns.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management evaluated the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report, and, based on this evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2016, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

31 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Non-Employee Director Share Issuances

On September 30, 2016, the Company agreed to issue 2,206 shares of its common stock to the Company’s non-employee directors under the Company’s 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and the Company’s Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan (the “Director Compensation Plan”) for attendance fees at board meetings of the Company during the third quarter of 2016. Under the Director Compensation Plan, which became effective on January 1, 2012, fees for attendance at board and committee meetings are payable 75% in shares of common stock and 25% in cash on a quarterly basis. The shares were issued at the price of $4.75, the fair market value of the shares on the date of issuance. The issuance of the shares was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

Other Significant Share Issuance

During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, the Company agreed to issue 92,980 shares to an individual investor at the price of $4.04 per share, the fair market value of the shares agreed upon for the purchase. The issuance of the shares was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, the Company agreed to issue 36,118 shares as compensation for legal services at the price of $3.53 per share, at 85% of the 30-day weighted average market price of the shares on the date of issuance. The issuance of the shares was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

Item 3. Defaults on Senior Securities

Junior Subordinated Debenture

On September 30, 2004, the Company issued a $5,155,000 junior subordinated debenture to an unconsolidated subsidiary (the “Debenture”). The Debenture has a term of thirty years. The interest rate was fixed at 6.4% for the first five years, and thereafter, the coupon rate floats quarterly at the three-month LIBOR rate plus 2.45% (3.13% at September 30, 2016). The Debenture is redeemable in certain circumstances. The terms of the Debenture allow the Company to defer payments of interest on the Debenture by extending the interest payment period at any time during the term of the Debenture for up to twenty consecutive quarterly periods. Beginning in 2010, the Company exercised its right to defer payment of interest on the Debenture. Interest payments deferred as of September 30, 2016 totaled $1,095,700. The Company has deferred interest payments with respect to the Debenture for the maximum allowable twenty consecutive quarterly payments. The holder of the Debenture can accelerate the $5,155,000 principal balance as a result of this default. Under the Written Agreement, the Company is not able to make these interest payments without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Regulatory approval to pay accrued and unpaid interest has been denied.

A Director of the Company has offered to purchase the Debenture and this offer has been approved by certain equity owners of the Trust that holds the Debenture. The Director has also agreed to enter into a forbearance agreement with the Company with respect to payments due under the Debenture upon consummation of the Director’s purchase of the debenture. Although the Director tendered the purchase price for the Debenture in 2014, the Trustee has received conflicting directions and therefore on December 11, 2014, the Trustee commenced an Action for Interpleader in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On August 31, 2015, the court held that the Trustee could not sell the Debenture to the Director because certain conditions and requirements set forth in the indenture for the Trust had not been fulfilled. The Director has continued his efforts to acquire the Debenture. To date, the Trustee has not accelerated the outstanding balance of the debenture.

In March of 2016, the Trustee received a direction from certain equity owners of the Trust that hold the Debenture to Sell the Debenture to a Director of the Company. Based upon the receipt of other conflicting directions, on August 26, 2016, the Trustee commenced an action in a Minnesota State Court seeking directions from the court. On September 14, 2016, a Notice of removal was filed and the case was removed to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. On October 10, 2016, the Trustee and the various Interested Parties filed a Stipulation to Transfer Venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Stipulation”). Based upon the Stipulation, on October 13, 2016, the Minnesota Federal Court entered its Order to Transfer Venue of the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The parties are seeking to have this matter assigned to the same District Court Judge who was assigned the Interpleader Action. To date no schedule order has been entered. The Company continues to pursue mechanisms for paying the accrued interest, such as raising additional capital.

In the event the amounts due under the Debenture were accelerated, then the Trustee could undertake legal proceedings to obtain a judgment against the Company with respect to such amounts due under the Debenture. If this action were successful, then the Trustee could seek to affect a sale of the Bank to pay the amounts due under the Debenture.

Item 6. Exhibits

The exhibits contained in the Exhibit Index following the signature page are filed with or incorporated by reference into this report.

32 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC.
		(Registrant)
Date:	November 14, 2016	By:	/s/ Timothy Terry
			Timothy Terry,
			Principal Executive Officer
		By:	/s/ James R. Odza
			James R. Odza,
			Principal Financial Officer

33 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act
31.2	Certification of Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer
32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer

34 

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

35 

EX-31.1

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. 10-Q

Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Timothy Terry, certify, that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
	(a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	(b)	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	(c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	(d)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):
	(a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of the internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	(b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:  November 14, 2016	By:	/s/ Timothy Terry
		Timothy Terry, Principal Executive Officer

36

EX-31.2

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. 10-Q

Exhibit 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, James R. Odza, certify, that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
	(a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	(b)	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	(c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	(d)	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):
	(a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of the internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	(b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:  November 14, 2016	By:	/s/ James R. Odza
		James R. Odza, Principal Financial Officer

37

EX-32.1

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. 10-Q

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy Terry, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2016 

/s/ Timothy Terry

Timothy Terry 

Principal Executive Officer 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. and will be returned by OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

38 

EX-32.2

OPTIMUMBANK HOLDINGS, INC. 10-Q

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Odza, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2016 

/s/ James R. Odza

James R. Odza 

Principal Financial Officer 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. and will be returned by OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

39 

XML

Document and Entity Information - shares	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Nov. 14, 2016
Document And Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001288855
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2016
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Is Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer?	No
Is Entity a Voluntary Filer?	No
Is Entity's Reporting Status Current?	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		1,099,826
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2016

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) - USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$ 11,337,000	$ 10,162,000
Interest-bearing deposits with banks	103,000	203,000
Total cash and cash equivalents	11,440,000	10,365,000
Securities available for sale	21,931,000	25,749,000
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $4,169 and $2,295	81,332,000	82,573,000
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	1,018,000	966,000
Premises and equipment, net	2,680,000	2,703,000
Foreclosed real estate, net	2,412,000	4,029,000
Accrued interest receivable	389,000	462,000
Other assets	519,000	631,000
Total assets	121,721,000	127,478,000
Liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	9,715,000	9,478,000
Savings, NOW and money-market deposits	22,943,000	24,034,000
Time deposits	57,650,000	64,059,000
Total deposits	90,308,000	97,571,000
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	20,500,000	20,000,000
Junior subordinated debenture	5,155,000	5,155,000
Advanced payment by borrowers for taxes and insurance	682,000	251,000
Official checks	159,000	130,000
Other liabilities	1,600,000	1,404,000
Total liabilities	118,404,000	124,511,000
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, no par value; 6,000,000 shares authorized, 7 shares issued and outstanding in 2016 and 4 shares issued and outstanding in 2015
Common stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, 1,099,826 shares issued and outstanding in 2016 and 50,000,000 shares authorized, 9,628,863 shares issued and outstanding in 2015	11,000	96,000
Additional paid-in capital	34,025,000	33,330,000
Accumulated deficit	(30,629,000)	(30,321,000)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	(90,000)	(138,000)
Total stockholders' equity	3,317,000	2,967,000
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 121,721,000	$ 127,478,000

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]
Loans, allowance for loan losses	$ 4,169	$ 2,295
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0	$ 0
Preferred stock, shares authorized	6,000,000	6,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	7	4
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	7	4
Common stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	50,000,000	50,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	1,099,826	9,628,863
Common stock, shares outstanding	1,099,826	9,628,863

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Interest income:
Loans	$ 1,082	$ 974	$ 3,156	$ 2,828
Securities	117	148	367	455
Other	24	20	75	58
Total interest income	1,223	1,142	3,598	3,341
Interest expense:
Deposits	181	162	550	479
Borrowings	91	60	260	176
Total interest expense	272	222	810	655
Net interest income	951	920	2,788	2,686
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	951	920	2,788	2,686
Noninterest income:
Service charges and fees	22	61	63	91
Gain on sale of securities available for sale	2	28	48	60
Other	7	83	14	221
Total noninterest income	31	172	125	372
Noninterest expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits	430	460	1,385	1,402
Occupancy and equipment	112	118	346	365
Data processing	77	84	250	224
Professional fees	151	171	480	423
Insurance	27	29	78	88
Foreclosed real estate, net	5	358	42	404
Regulatory assessment	74	78	221	225
Other	84	68	419	377
Total noninterest expenses	960	1,366	3,221	3,508
Earnings (loss) before tax benefit	22	(274)	(308)	(450)
Income tax benefit		(320)		(320)
Net earnings (loss)	$ 22	$ 46	$ (308)	$ (130)
Net (loss) earnings per share:
Basic and diluted	$ .02	$ .05	$ (.30)	$ (.12)

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Statement of Comprehensive Income [Abstract]
Net earnings (loss)	$ 22	$ 46	$ (308)	$ (130)
Unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale:
Unrealized (loss) gain arising during the period	(281)	206	129	53
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains on securities available for sale	(2)	(28)	(48)	(60)
Net change in unrealized (loss) gain	(283)	178	81	(7)
Deferred income taxes (benefit) on above change	(107)	67	33	(3)
Total other comprehensive (loss) income	(176)	111	48	(4)
Comprehensive (loss) income	$ (154)	$ 157	$ (260)	$ (134)

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Preferred Stock [Member]	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-in Capital [Member]	Accumulated Deficit [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Member]	Total
Balance beginning at Dec. 31, 2014		$ 93	$ 32,961	$ (30,158)	$ 83	$ 2,979
Balance beginning, shares at Dec. 31, 2014		9,305,236
Proceeds from sale of common stock			30			30
Proceeds from sale of common stock, shares		37,500
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock			75			75
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock, shares	3
Common stock issued as compensation to directors		$ 2	227			229
Common stock issued as compensation to directors, shares		251,123
Net loss				(130)		(130)
Net change in unrealized (gain) loss on securities available for sale, net of taxes					(4)	(4)
Balance ending at Sep. 30, 2015		$ 95	33,293	(30,288)	79	3,179
Balance ending, shares at Sep. 30, 2015	3	9,593,859
Balance beginning at Dec. 31, 2015		$ 96	33,330	(30,321)	(138)	2,967
Balance beginning, shares at Dec. 31, 2015	4	9,628,863
Proceeds from sale of common stock		$ 1	374			375
Proceeds from sale of common stock, shares		92,980
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock			75			75
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock, shares	3
Common stock issued as compensation to directors		$ 1	231			232
Common stock issued as compensation to directors, shares		53,855
Net loss				(308)		(308)
Net change in unrealized (gain) loss on securities available for sale, net of taxes					48	48
Reverse common stock split (1-for-10)		$ (87)	87
Reverse common stock split (1-for-10), shares		(8,665,694)
Common stock issued for services			128			128
Common stock issued for services, shares		36,118
Reversal of common stock issued as compensation to directors			(200)			(200)
Reversal of common stock issued as compensation to directors, shares		(46,296)
Balance ending at Sep. 30, 2016		$ 11	$ 34,025	$ (30,629)	$ (90)	$ 3,317
Balance ending, shares at Sep. 30, 2016	7	1,099,826

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Parenthetical)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016
Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]
Reverse stock split ratio	0.10

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$ (308)	$ (130)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	118	120
Gain on sale of securities available for sale	(48)	(60)
Common stock issued as compensation to directors	32	229
Common stock issued as compensation for services	128
Net amortization of fees, premiums and discounts	38	483
Decrease (increase) in other assets	79	(68)
Write-down of foreclosed real estate		280
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable	73	(19)
Increase in official checks and other liabilities	225	1
Net cash provided by operating activities	337	836
Cash flows from investing activities:
Principal repayments and maturity of securities available for sale	3,074	3,462
Proceeds from sale of securities	18,028	8,255
Purchases of securities available for sale	(17,294)	(11,053)
Net decrease (increase) in loans	1,342	(1,221)
Purchase of premises and equipment	(95)	(23)
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate, net	1,617	610
(Purchase) Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock	(52)	359
Net cash provided by investing activities	6,620	389
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net (decrease) increase in deposits	(7,263)	1,201
Increase in advanced payment by borrowers for taxes and insurance	431	415
Purchase (Repayment) of Federal Home Loan Bank advances, net	500	(6,740)
Proceeds from sale of common stock	375	30
Proceeds from sale of preferred stock	75	75
Net cash used in financing activities	(5,882)	(5,019)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	1,075	(3,794)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period	10,365	12,074
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	11,440	8,280
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	671	537
Noncash transactions:
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net change in unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale	$ 48	$ (4)

XML

General

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

General

(1)	General.  OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (the “Holding Company”) is a one-bank holding company and owns 100% of OptimumBank (the “Bank”), a Florida-chartered commercial bank. The Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries are OB Real Estate Management, LLC and OB Real Estate Holdings, LLC, both of which were formed in 2009; OB Real Estate Holdings 1692 and OB Real Estate Holdings 1704 formed in 2012, collectively, (the “Real Estate Holding Subsidiaries”). The Holding Company’s only business is the operation of the Bank and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). The Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Bank offers a variety of community banking services to individual and corporate customers through its three banking offices located in Broward County, Florida. OB Real Estate Management, LLC is primarily engaged in managing foreclosed real estate. This subsidiary had no activity in 2016 and 2015. All other subsidiaries are primarily engaged in holding and disposing of foreclosed real estate.
	In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company contain all adjustments (consisting principally of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position at September 30, 2016, the results of operations and comprehensive (loss) income for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 and cash flows for the nine month periods ending September 30, 2016 and 2015. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
	Going Concern Status. The Company is in default with respect to its $5,155,000 Junior Subordinated Debenture (“Debenture”) due to its failure to make certain required interest payments under the Debenture. The Trustee of the Debenture (the “Trustee”) or the holders of the Debenture are entitled to accelerate the payment of the $5,155,000 principal balance plus accrued and unpaid interest totaling $1,095,700 at September 30, 2016. No adjustments to the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been made as a result of this uncertainty. Management’s plans with regard to this matter are as follows: A Director of the Company has offered to purchase the Debenture and this offer has been approved by certain equity owners of the Trust that holds the Debenture. The Director has also agreed to enter into a forbearance agreement with the Company with respect to payments due under the Debenture upon consummation of the Director’s purchase of the Debenture. Although the Director tendered the purchase price for the Debenture in 2014, the Trustee has received conflicting directions and therefore on December 11, 2014, the Trustee commenced an Action for Interpleader in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Interpleader Action”). On August 31, 2015, the court held that the Trustee could not sell the Debenture to the Director because certain conditions and requirements set forth in the indenture for the Trust had not been fulfilled. The Director has continued his efforts to acquire the Debenture. To date the Trustee has not accelerated the outstanding balance of the Debenture.
	In March of 2016, the Trustee received a direction from certain equity owners of the Trust that hold the Debenture to Sell the Debenture to a Director of the Company. Based upon the receipt of other conflicting directions, on August 26, 2016, the Trustee commenced an action in a Minnesota State Court seeking directions from the Court. On September 14, 2016, a Notice of Removal was filed and the case was removed to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. On October 10, 2016, the Trustee and the various Interested Parties filed a Stipulation to Transfer Venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Stipulation”). Based upon the Stipulation, on October 13, 2016, the Minnesota Federal Court entered its Order to Transfer Venue of the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The parties are seeking to have this matter assigned to the same District Court Judge who was assigned the Interpleader Action. To date no scheduling order has been entered. The Company continues to pursue mechanisms for paying the accrued interest, such as raising additional capital.
	Comprehensive (Loss) Income. Generally accepted accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net earnings (loss). Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the condensed consolidated balance sheet, such items along with net earnings (loss), are components of comprehensive (loss) earnings. The only component of other comprehensive (loss) income is the net change in the unrealized (loss) gain on the securities available for sale.
	Income Taxes. The Company assessed its earnings history and trends and estimates of future earnings, and determined that the deferred tax asset could not be realized as of September 30, 2016. Accordingly, a valuation allowance was recorded against the net deferred tax asset.
	Recent Pronouncements. In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which is intended to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information. The ASU requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair values recognized in net earnings, simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identity impairment and eliminates the requirement to disclose fair values, the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The ASU also clarifies that the Company should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available for-sale debt securities in combination with the Company’s other deferred tax assets. These amendments are effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
	In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-2, Leases (Topic 842) which will require lessees to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases with term of more than twelve months. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease.  The new ASU will require both types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet.  The ASU also will require disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements, providing additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements.  The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is in the process of determining the effect of the ASU on its consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations.  Early application will be permitted.
	In June 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13 Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326).  The ASU improves financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by the Company. The ASU requires the Company to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. The Company will continue to use judgment to determine which loss estimation method is appropriate for their circumstances. The ASU requires enhanced disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an organization’s portfolio. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements that provide additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. Additionally, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The ASU will take effect for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application will be permitted for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018.
	Reclassification. Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2016 financial statement presentation.
	Recent Regulatory Developments. Basel III Rules. On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) approved the final rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. banks. Under the final rules, minimum requirements will increase for both the quantity and quality of capital held by the Bank. The rules include a new common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 4.5% and a common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets. The final rules also raise the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0% to 6.0% and require a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%. The final rules also implement strict eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments. On July 9, 2013, the FDIC also approved, as an interim final rule, the regulatory capital requirements for U.S. banks, following the actions of the FRB. The FDIC’s rule is identical in substance to the final rules issued by the FRB. The phase-in period for the final rules began for the Bank on January 1, 2015, with full compliance with all of the final rule’s requirements phased in over a multi-year schedule. The provisions of the final rules are not expected to have a material impact on the Bank.

XML

Securities

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Investments, Debt and Equity Securities [Abstract]

Securities

(2) Securities. Securities have been classified according to management’s intent. The carrying amount of securities and approximate fair values are as follows (in thousands):

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
At September 30, 2016:
Securities Available for Sale-
Mortgage-backed securities	$	3,288	$	50	$	—		$	3,338
Collateralized mortgage obligations		18,787		26		(220	)		18,593
Total	$	22,075	$	76	$	(220	)	$	21,931
At December 31, 2015:
Securities Available for Sale-
Mortgage-backed securities	$	10,107	$	31	$	(52	)	$	10,086
Collateralized mortgage obligations		15,223		21		(227	)		15,017
SBA Pool Security		644		2		—			646
Total	$	25,974	$	54	$	(279	)	$	25,749

The following summarizes the sales of securities (in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September 30
	2016			2015
Proceeds from sales of securities	$	18,028		$	8,255
Gross gains from sale of securities		66			87
Gross losses from sale of securities		(18	)		(27	)
Net gains from sales of securities	$	48		$	60

Securities with gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, is as follows (in thousands):

	At September 30, 2016
	Over Twelve Months					Less Than Twelve Months
	Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Securities Available for Sale-
Collateralized mortgage obligations	$	(13	)	$	942	$	(207	)	$	12,811

	At December 31, 2015
	Over Twelve Months				Less Than Twelve Months
	Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Securities Available for Sale:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	—	$	(52	)	$	5,526
Collateralized mortgage obligations		—		—		(227	)		11,783
	$	—	$	—	$	(279	)	$	17,309

At September 30, 2016, the unrealized losses on eight investment securities were caused by market conditions. It is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the book value of the investments. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to market conditions and not credit quality, and because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. A security is impaired if the fair value is less than its carrying value at the financial statement date. When a security is impaired, the Company determines whether this impairment is temporary or other-than-temporary. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses, management assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of these criteria is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized in operations. For securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment recognized in operations is limited to the amount related to credit losses, while impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). Management utilizes cash flow models to segregate impairments to distinguish between impairment related to credit losses and impairment related to other factors. To assess for OTTI, management considers, among other things, (i) the severity and duration of the impairment; (ii) the ratings of the security; (iii) the overall transaction structure (the Company’s position within the structure, the aggregate, near-term financial performance of the underlying collateral, delinquencies, defaults, loss severities, recoveries, prepayments, cumulative loss projections, and discounted cash flows); and (iv) the timing and magnitude of a break in modeled cash flows.

In evaluating securities with unrealized losses, management utilizes various resources, including input from independent third-party firms to perform an analysis of expected future cash flows. The process begins with an assessment of the underlying collateral backing the mortgage pools. Management develops specific assumptions using as much market data as possible and includes internal estimates as well as estimates published by rating agencies and other third-party sources. The data for the individual borrowers in the underlying mortgage pools are generally segregated by state, FICO score at issue, loan to value at issue, and income documentation criteria. Mortgage pools are evaluated for current and expected levels of delinquencies and foreclosures, based on where they fall in the prescribed data set of FICO score, locations, LTV and documentation type, and a level of loss severity is assigned to each security based on its experience. The above-described historical data is used to develop current and expected measures of cumulative default rates as well as ultimate loss frequency and severity within the underlying mortgages. This reveals the expected future cash flows within the mortgage pool. The data described above is then input to an industry recognized model to assess the behavior of the particular security tranche owned by the Company. Significant inputs in this process include the structure of any subordination structures, if applicable, and are dictated by the structure of each particular security as laid out in the offering documents. The forecasted cash flows from the mortgage pools are input through the security structuring model to derive expected cash flows for the specific security owned by the Company to determine if the future cash flows are expected to exceed the book value of the security. The values for the significant inputs are updated on a regular basis.

The Company did not record any OTTI losses for securities available for sale.

XML

Loans

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Receivables [Abstract]

Loans

(3) Loans.  The components of loans are as follows (in thousands):

	At September 30,			At December 31,
	2016			2015
Residential real estate	$	28,244		$	16,203
Multi-family real estate		5,789			3,697
Commercial real estate		31,405			34,771
Land and construction		4,096			5,258
Commercial		13,327			21,770
Consumer		2,098			3,015
Total loans		84,959			84,714
Add (deduct):
Net deferred loan fees, costs and premiums		542			154
Allowance for loan losses		(4,169	)		(2,295	)
Loans, net	$	81,332		$	82,573

An analysis of the change in the allowance for loan losses follows (in thousands):

	Residential			Multi-Family			Commercial			Land
	Real			Real			Real			and
	Estate			Estate			Estate			Construction			Commercial			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016:
Beginning balance	$	262		$	39		$	1,012		$	64		$	200		$	156		$	2,507		$	4,240
Provision (credit) for loan losses		58			19			89			(4	)		48			75			(285	)		—
Charge-offs		—			—			(14	)		—			—			(72	)		—			(86	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			6			—			9			—			15
Ending balance	$	320		$	58		$	1,087		$	66		$	248		$	168		$	2,222		$	4,169
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016:
Beginning balance	$	116		$	26		$	1,085		$	77		$	120		$	151		$	720		$	2,295
Provision (credit) for loan losses		204			32			(2,033	)		(29	)		128			196			1,502			—
Charge-offs		—			—			(14	)		—			—			(195	)		—			(209	)
Recoveries		—			—			2,049			18			—			16			—			2,083
Ending balance	$	320			58			1,087			66			248			168			2,222			4,169
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015:
Beginning balance	$	48		$	25		$	1,408		$	34		$	77		$	147		$	440		$	2,179
Provision (credit) for loan losses		181			(14	)		(143	)		14			(36	)		19			(21	)		—
Charge-offs		(195	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(195	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			3			—			3
Ending balance	$	34		$	11		$	1,265		$	48		$	41		$	169		$	419		$	1,987
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015:
Beginning balance	$	66		$	2		$	1,794		$	99		$	17		$	—		$	266		$	2,244
Provision (credit) for loan losses		235			9			(529	)		(51	)		24			159			153			—
Charge-offs		(267	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(267	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			10			—			10
Ending balance	$	34		$	11		$	1,265		$	48		$	41		$	169		$	419		$	1,987

	Residential		Multi-Family		Commercial		Land
	Real		Real		Real		and
	Estate		Estate		Estate		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
At September 30, 2016:
Individually evaluated for impairment:
Recorded investment	$	379	$	—	$	2,129	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	2,508
Balance in allowance for loan losses	$	—	$	—	$	374	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	374
Collectively evaluated for impairment:
Recorded investment	$	27,865	$	5,789	$	29,276	$	4,096	$	13,327	$	2,098	$	—	$	82,451
Balance in allowance for loan losses	$	320	$	58	$	713	$	66	$	248	$	168	$	2,222	$	3,795
At December 31, 2015:
Individually evaluated for impairment:
Recorded investment	$	1,319	$	—	$	4,273	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	5,592
Balance in allowance for loan losses	$	—	$	—	$	13	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	13
Collectively evaluated for impairment:
Recorded investment	$	14,884	$	3,697	$	30,498	$	5,258	$	21,770	$	3,015	$	—	$	79,122
Balance in allowance for loan losses	$	116	$	26	$	1,072	$	77	$	120	$	151	$	720	$	2,282

Residential Real Estate, Multi-Family Real Estate, Commercial Real Estate, Land and Construction. All loans are underwritten in accordance with policies set forth and approved by the Board of Directors (the “Board”), including repayment capacity and source, value of the underlying property, credit history and stability. Multi-family and commercial real estate loans are secured by the subject property and are underwritten based upon standards set forth in the policies approved by the Company’s Board. Such standards include, among other factors, loan to value limits, cash flow coverage and general creditworthiness of the obligors. Construction loans to borrowers finance the construction of owner occupied and leased properties. These loans are categorized as construction loans during the construction period, later converting to commercial or residential real estate loans after the construction is complete and amortization of the loan begins. Real estate development and construction loans are approved based on an analysis of the borrower and guarantor, the viability of the project and on an acceptable percentage of the appraised value of the property securing the loan. Real estate development and construction loan funds are disbursed periodically based on the percentage of construction completed. The Company carefully monitors these loans with on-site inspections and requires the receipt of lien waivers on funds advanced. Development and construction loans are typically secured by the properties under development or construction, and personal guarantees are typically obtained. Further, to assure that reliance is not placed solely on the value of the underlying property, the Company considers the market conditions and feasibility of proposed projects, the financial condition and reputation of the borrower and guarantors, the amount of the borrower’s equity in the project, independent appraisals, cost estimates and pre-construction sales information. The Company also makes loans on occasion for the purchase of land for future development by the borrower. Land loans are extended for future development for either commercial or residential use by the borrower. The Company carefully analyzes the intended use of the property and the viability thereof.

Commercial. Commercial business loans and lines of credit consist of loans to small- and medium-sized companies in the Company’s market area. Commercial loans are generally used for working capital purposes or for acquiring equipment, inventory or furniture. Primarily all of the Company’s commercial loans are secured loans, along with a small amount of unsecured loans. The Company’s underwriting analysis consists of a review of the financial statements of the borrower, the lending history of the borrower, the debt service capabilities of the borrower, the projected cash flows of the business, the value of the collateral, if any, and whether the loan is guaranteed by the principals of the borrower. These loans are generally secured by accounts receivable, inventory and equipment. Commercial loans are typically made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business, which makes them of higher risk than residential loans and the collateral securing loans may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. The Company seeks to minimize these risks through its underwriting standards.

Consumer. Consumer loans are extended for various purposes, including purchases of automobiles, recreational vehicles, and boats. Also offered are home improvement loans, lines of credit, personal loans, and deposit account collateralized loans. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels. Loans to consumers are extended after a credit evaluation, including the creditworthiness of the borrower(s), the purpose of the credit, and the secondary source of repayment. Consumer loans are made at fixed and variable interest rates. Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts.

The following summarizes the loan credit quality (in thousands):

		Pass		OLEM (Other Loans Especially Mentioned)		Sub-standard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
At September 30, 2016:
Residential real estate	$	26,226	$	1,639	$	379	$	—	$	—	$	28,244
Multi-family real estate		5,789		—		—		—		—		5,789
Commercial real estate		27,000		1,187		3,218		—		—		31,405
Land and construction		4,050		46		—		—		—		4,096
Commercial		11,582		—		1,745		—		—		13,327
Consumer		2,098		—		—		—		—		2,098
Total	$	76,745	$	2,872	$	5,342	$	—	$	—	$	84,959
At December 31, 2015:
Residential real estate	$	15,132	$	—	$	1,071	$	—	$	—	$	16,203
Multi-family real estate		3,697		—		—		—		—		3,697
Commercial real estate		29,925		573		4,273		—		—		34,771
Land and construction		5,212		46		—		—		—		5,258
Commercial		19,916		—		1,854		—		—		21,770
Consumer		3,015		—		—		—		—		3,015
Total	$	76,897	$	619	$	7,198	$	—	$	—	$	84,714

Pass – a Pass loan’s primary source of loan repayment is satisfactory, with secondary sources very likely to be realized if necessary. These are loans that conform in all aspects to bank policy and regulatory requirements, and no repayment risk has been identified.

OLEM (Other Loans Especially Mentioned) – an Other Loan Especially Mentioned has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in the deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or the Company’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard – a Substandard loan is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. Included in this category are loans that are current on their payments, but the Bank is unable to document the source of repayment. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful – a loan classified as Doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified as Substandard, with the added characteristics that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this basically worthless asset even though partial recovery may be affected in the future. The Company charges off any loan classified as Doubtful.

Loss – a loan classified Loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as a bankable asset is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this basically worthless asset even though partial recovery may be affected in the future. The Company fully charges off any loan classified as Loss.

Age analysis of past-due loans is as follows (in thousands):

		Accruing Loans
		30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Nonaccrual Loans		Total Loans
At September 30, 2016:
Residential real estate	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	27,865	$	379	$	28,244
Multi-family real estate		—		—		—		—		5,789		—		5,789
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		30,287		1,118		31,405
Land and construction		—		—		—		—		4,096		—		4,096
Commercial		—		—		—		—		13,327		—		13,327
Consumer		—		—		—		—		2,098		—		2,098
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	83,462	$	1,497	$	84,959
At December 31, 2015:
Residential real estate	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	15,132	$	1,071	$	16,203
Multi-family real estate		—		—		—		—		3,697		—		3,697
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		31,539		3,232		34,771
Land and construction		—		—		—		—		5,258		—		5,258
Commercial		—		—		—		—		21,770		—		21,770
Consumer		—		—		—		—		3,015		—		3,015
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	80,411	$	4,303	$	84,714

The following summarizes the amount of impaired loans (in thousands):

	At September 30, 2016						At December 31, 2015
		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential real estate	$	379	$	684	$	—	$	1,319	$	2,243	$	—
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		3,232		6,584		—
With related allowance recorded -
Commercial real estate	$	2,129	$	2,292		374		1,041		1,041		13
Total
Residential real estate	$	379	$	684	$	—	$	1,319	$	2,243	$	—
Commercial real estate	$	2,129	$	2,292	$	374	$	4,273	$	7,625	$	13
Total	$	2,508	$	2,976	$	374	$	5,592	$	9,868	$	13

The average net investment in impaired loans and interest income recognized and received on impaired loans are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2016						2015
	Average		Interest		Interest		Average		Interest		Interest
	Recorded		Income		Income		Recorded		Income		Income
	Investment		Recognized		Received		Investment		Recognized		Received
Residential real estate	$	598	$	3	$	16	$	4,532	$	35	$	58
Commercial real estate	$	1,829	$	16	$	22	$	4,898	$	18	$	65
Total	$	2,427	$	19	$	38	$	9,430	$	53	$	123

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016						2015
	Average		Interest		Interest		Average		Interest		Interest
	Recorded		Income		Income		Recorded		Income		Income
	Investment		Recognized		Received		Investment		Recognized		Received
Residential real estate	$	1,057	$	36	$	64	$	5,367	$	104	$	211
Commercial real estate	$	2,483	$	63	$	89	$	5,074	$	57	$	215
Total	$	3,540	$	99	$	153	$	10,441	$	161	$	426

No loans have been determined to be troubled debt restructurings during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 or 2015.

XML

Regulatory Capital

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Regulatory Capital

Regulatory Capital

(4) Regulatory Capital. The Bank is required to maintain certain minimum regulatory capital requirements. The following is a summary at September 30, 2016 of the regulatory capital requirements and the Bank’s capital on a percentage basis:

	Bank			Consent Order Regulatory Requirement
Tier I capital to total average assets		7.78	%		8.00	%
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets		11.07	%		N/A
Common equity Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets		11.07	%		N/A
Total capital to risk-weighted assets		12.37	%		12.00	%

At September 30, 2016, the Bank is well-capitalized. As a result of the Consent Order discussed in Note 9, the Bank cannot be categorized higher than “adequately capitalized” until the Consent Order is lifted, even if its ratios were to exceed those required to be a “well capitalized” bank.

XML

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Net (loss) earnings per share:

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

(5) Earnings (Loss) Per Share. Basic earnings (loss) per share has been computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Earnings (loss) per common share have been computed based on the following (weighted-average number of common shares outstanding have been adjusted for the reverse stock split discussed in note 11):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share		1,097,644		955,802		1,024,704		951,977

XML

Stock-Based Compensation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]

Stock-Based Compensation

(6)

Stock-Based Compensation.  On December 27, 2011, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (“2011 Plan”). In May 2016, the Company increased the total number of shares available to be awarded from 105,000 shares (adjusted for the one-for-ten reverse stock split) to 210,000 shares. Options, restricted stock, performance share awards and bonus share awards in lieu of obligations may be issued under the 2011 Plan. Both incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options can be granted under the 2011 Plan. The exercise price of the stock options cannot be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Options must be exercised within ten years of the date of grant.

As of September 30, 2016, only common stock has been issued as compensation to directors for services rendered under this plan. 7,559 and 25,112 shares of common stock (adjusted for one-for-ten reverse stock split) were issued for the periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. A total of $32,000 and $229,000 of compensation was recorded during the 2016 and 2015 periods. At September 30, 2016 a total of 149,482 (adjusted for one-for-ten reverse stock split) shares remain available for grant.

XML

Fair Value Measurements

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value MeasurementS

(7) Fair Value Measurements.  Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are as follows (in thousands):

											Losses
	Fair								Total		Recorded in
	Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Losses		Operations
At September 30, 2016:
Residential real estate	$	379	$	—	$	—	$	379	$	125	$	—
Commercial real estate		850		—		—		850		268	$	268
	$	1,229	$	—	$	—	$	1,229	$	393	$	268
Foreclosed real estate	$	2,412	$	—	$	—	$	2,412	$	1,118	$	—
At December 31, 2015:
Residential real estate	$	423	$	—	$	—	$	423	$	125	$	—
Commercial real estate		2,094		—		—		2,094		2,055		—
	$	2,517	$	—	$	—	$	2,517	$	2,180	$	—
Foreclosed real estate	$	4,029	$	—	$	—	$	4,029	$	1,403	$	260

XML

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

(8) Fair Value of Financial Instruments.  The estimated fair values and fair value measurement method with respect to the Company’s financial instruments were as follows (in thousands):

	At September 30, 2016							At December 31, 2015
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value			Level		Carrying Amount		Fair Value			Level
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	11,440	$	11,440			1	$	10,365	$	10,365			1
Securities available for sale		21,931		21,931			2		25,749		25,749			2
Loans		81,332		81,419			3		82,573		82,429			3
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,018		1,018			3		966		966			3
Accrued interest receivable		389		389			3		462		462			3
Financial liabilities:
Deposit liabilities		90,308		90,647			3		97,571		97,837			3
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		20,500		20,544			3		20,000		20,000			3
Junior subordinated debenture		5,155		N/A	(1)		3		5,155		N/A	(1)		3
Off-balance sheet financial instruments		—		—			—		—		—			3

(1) The Company is unable to determine value based on significant unobservable inputs required in the calculation. Refer to Note 10 for further information.

Discussion regarding the assumptions used to compute the estimated fair values of financial instruments can be found in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

XML

Regulatory Matters

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Matters

(9)	Regulatory Matters. The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the bank regulatory agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company and Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of its assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
	Effective January 1, 2015, the Bank, became subject to the new Basel III capital level threshold requirements under the Prompt Corrective Action regulations with full compliance with all of the final rule’s requirements phased in over a multi-year schedule. These new regulations were designed to ensure that banks maintain strong capital positions even in the event of severe economic downturns or unforeseen losses.
	Changes that could affect the Bank going forward include additional constraints on the inclusion of deferred tax assets in capital and increased risk weightings for nonperforming loans and acquisition/development loans in regulatory capital. Under the new regulations in the first quarter of 2015, the Bank elected an irreversible one-time opt-out to exclude accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from regulatory capital.
	As of September 30, 2016, the Bank is subject to a Consent Order issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation (“OFR”), and accordingly is deemed to be “adequately capitalized” even if its capital ratios were to exceed those generally required to be a “well capitalized” bank. An institution must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the following tables. The Bank’s actual capital amounts and percentages are also presented in the table (dollars in thousands): The following table shows the Bank’s capital amounts and ratios and regulatory thresholds at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in thousands):

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					Minimum To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions					Requirements of Consent Order
	Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%
As of September 30, 2016:
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	$	10,564		12.37	%	$	6,832		8.0	%	$	8,540		10.0	%	$	10,248		12.0	%
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,458		11.07			5,124		6.0			6,832		8.0			N/A		N/A
Common equity Tier I capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,458		11.07			3,843		4.5			5,551		6.5			N/A		N/A
Tier I Capital to Total Assets		9,458		7.78			4,865		4.0			6,081		5.0			9,730		8.0
As of December 31, 2015:
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	$	10,319		11.40	%	$	7,240		8.0	%	$	9,050		10.0	%	$	10,860		12.0	%
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,173		10.14			5,430		6.0			7,240		8.0			N/A		N/A
Common equity Tier I capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,173		10.14			4,073		4.5			5,883		6.5			N/A		N/A
Tier I Capital to Total Assets		9,173		7.59			4,836		4.0			6,045		5.0			9,672		8.0

Regulatory Enforcement Actions

Bank Consent Order. On April 16, 2010, the Bank agreed to the issuance of the Consent Order by the FDIC and the OFR (the “Original Consent Order”), which was amended on February 28, 2014. Under the Original Consent Order, the Bank was required to take certain measures to improve its capital position, reduce its level of problem assets, reduce its loan concentrations in certain portfolios, improve management practices and board supervision and assure that its reserve for loan losses is maintained at an appropriate level. The Original Consent Order required the Bank to maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 8% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 12%. At September 30, 2016, the Bank had a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 7.78%, and a total risk-based capital ratio of 12.37%.

See Footnote 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s 2015 Form 10-K for additional information concerning the requirements of the Original Consent Order.

During the second quarter of 2016, the Bank was notified by the FDIC and the OFR that the Bank had not complied with certain of the terms of the Original Consent Order, and that the Bank continues to exhibit weaknesses in its level of capital, loan quality, earnings, liquidity and sensitivity to market risks. The FDIC and OFR also noted issues related to the management of the Bank, including issues with capital adequacy, risk management, loan concentrations, operating deficits, compliance with the Original Consent Order, weaknesses in the Bank’s customer related due diligence, insider conflicts of interest and regulatory compliance.

On November 2, 2016, at the request of the FDIC and the OFR, the Bank agreed to the entry of a new Consent Order to be issued by the FDIC and the OFR (the “New Order”). The New Order will become effective when issued by the FDIC and the OFR.

The New Order addresses many of the issues addressed in the Original Consent Order, as well as issues related to board supervision and composition, management composition, asset quality, lending practices, allowance for loan losses, asset growth, and compliance with the Bank Secrecy act and related regulations. The New Order will continue to restrict the ability of the Bank to pay dividends.

Management believes that the Bank has made substantial progress in improving its financial condition through a significant reduction in non-performing assets and the receipt of capital increases from investors since the date of the Original Consent Order. The Bank is also seeking to address the other issues raised by the FDIC and the OFR, although the Bank has been hampered by difficulties in raising capital due to the default under the Debenture and the limits placed on the Company and the Bank under the Original Consent Order and the Written Agreement. Management intends to continue its efforts to meet the conditions of the New Consent Order and the Written Agreement.

Company Written Agreement with Reserve Bank. On June 22, 2010, the Company and the Reserve Bank entered into a Written Agreement with respect to certain aspects of the operation and management of the Company The Written Agreement prohibits, without the prior approval of the Reserve Bank, the payment of dividends, taking dividends or payments from the Bank, making any interest, principal or other distributions on trust preferred securities (including the Debenture), incurring, increasing or guaranteeing any debt, purchasing or redeeming any shares of stock, or appointing any new director or senior executive officer. Management believes that the Company is in substantial compliance with the requirements of the Written Agreement.

XML

Junior Subordinated Debenture

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Junior Subordinated Debenture

(10)	Junior Subordinated Debenture.  On September 30, 2004, the Company issued a $5,155,000 junior subordinated debenture to an unconsolidated subsidiary (the “Debenture”). The Debenture has a term of thirty years. The interest rate was fixed at 6.4% for the first five years, and thereafter, the coupon rate floats quarterly at the three-month LIBOR rate plus 2.45% (3.13% at September 30, 2016). The Debenture is redeemable in certain circumstances. The terms of the Debenture allow the Company to defer payments of interest on the Debenture by extending the interest payment period at any time during the term of the Debenture for up to twenty consecutive quarterly periods. Beginning in 2010, the Company exercised its right to defer payment of interest on the Debenture. Interest payments deferred as of September 30, 2016 totaled $1,095,700. The Company has deferred interest payments with respect to the Debenture for the maximum allowable twenty consecutive quarterly payments. The holder of the Debenture can accelerate the $5,155,000 principal balance as a result of this default. Under the Written Agreement, the Company is not able to make these interest payments without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Regulatory approval to pay accrued and unpaid interest has been denied.
	A Director of the Company has offered to purchase the Debenture and this offer has been approved by certain equity owners of the Trust that holds the Debenture. The Director has also agreed to enter into a forbearance agreement with the Company with respect to payments due under the Debenture upon consummation of the Director’s purchase of the debenture. Although the Director tendered the purchase price for the Debenture in 2014, the Trustee has received conflicting directions and therefore on December 11, 2014, the Trustee commenced an Action for Interpleader in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On August 31, 2015, the court held that the Trustee could not sell the Debenture to the Director because certain conditions and requirements set forth in the indenture for the Trust had not been fulfilled. The Director has continued his efforts to acquire the Debenture.  To date the Trustee has not accelerated the outstanding balance of the debenture.
	In March of 2016, the Trustee received a direction from certain equity owners of the Trust that hold the Debenture to Sell the Debenture to a Director of the Company. Based upon the receipt of other conflicting directions, on August 26, 2016, the Trustee commenced an action in a Minnesota State Court seeking directions from the Court. On September 14, 2016, a Notice of Removal was filed and the case was removed to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. On October 10, 2016, the Trustee and the various Interested Parties filed a Stipulation to Transfer Venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Stipulation”). Based upon the Stipulation, on October 13, 2016, the Minnesota Federal Court entered its Order to Transfer Venue of the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The parties are seeking to have this matter assigned to the same District Court Judge who was assigned the Interpleader Action. To date no schedule order has been entered. The Company continues to pursue mechanisms for paying the accrued interest, such as raising additional capital.

XML

Reverse Common Stock Split

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Equity [Abstract]

Reverse Common Stock Split

(11) Reverse Common Stock Split.  Effective January 11, 2016 each ten shares of the Company’s common stock were converted into one share of common stock. Earnings (loss) per share for 2016 and 2015 has been adjusted to reflect the 1-for-10 reverse common stock split.

XML

Loan Loss Recovery

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Loan Loss Recovery

Loan Loss Recovery

(12) Loan Loss Recovery.  On January 6, 2016, the Bank completed a sale of judgement on a defaulted credit that resulted in a $1.8 million recovery of previously charged-off amounts to the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (“ALLL”). This increases the balance of the ALLL to approximately $4.2 million. On February 12, 2016, and amended May 6, 2016, pursuant to the terms and requirements of the Consent Order, Management submitted a written request to the FDIC for a partial reversal of the ALLL. As of this date, no response from the FDIC has been received and management does not expect a response until the next safety and soundness examination which is expected to be performed in first and second quarters of 2017.

XML

Reclassification

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Reclassification

Reclassification

(13) Reclassification.  During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Company agreed to issue 46,296 shares to the Bank’s Chairman as compensation. The Company recorded compensation expense of $200,000 based on the fair market value of the shares at that time, and reflected the issuance of the shares as an increase in stockholders’ equity. The Bank’s Chairman has not yet taken delivery of the shares. As a result, during the quarter ended September 30, 2016, the Company determined to reclassify the transaction as a liability of the Company (rather than an increase in stockholders’ equity) until the issuance of the shares. The reclassification had no effect on the Company’s net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 or the quarter ended September 30, 2016.

XML

General (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Comprehensive (Loss) Income

Comprehensive (Loss) Income. Generally accepted accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net earnings (loss). Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the condensed consolidated balance sheet, such items along with net earnings (loss), are components of comprehensive (loss) earnings. The only component of other comprehensive (loss) income is the net change in the unrealized (loss) gain on the securities available for sale.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes. The Company assessed its earnings history and trends and estimates of future earnings, and determined that the deferred tax asset could not be realized as of September 30, 2016. Accordingly, a valuation allowance was recorded against the net deferred tax asset.

Recent Pronouncements and Recent Regulatory Developments

Recent Pronouncements. In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which is intended to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information. The ASU requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair values recognized in net earnings, simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identity impairment and eliminates the requirement to disclose fair values, the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The ASU also clarifies that the Company should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available for-sale debt securities in combination with the Company’s other deferred tax assets. These amendments are effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-2, Leases (Topic 842) which will require lessees to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases with term of more than twelve months. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease.  The new ASU will require both types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet.  The ASU also will require disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements, providing additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements.  The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is in the process of determining the effect of the ASU on its consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations.  Early application will be permitted.

In June 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13 Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326).  The ASU improves financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by the Company. The ASU requires the Company to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. The Company will continue to use judgment to determine which loss estimation method is appropriate for their circumstances. The ASU requires enhanced disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an organization’s portfolio. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative requirements that provide additional information about the amounts recorded in the financial statements. Additionally, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The ASU will take effect for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application will be permitted for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018.

Recent Regulatory Developments. Basel III Rules. On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) approved the final rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. banks. Under the final rules, minimum requirements will increase for both the quantity and quality of capital held by the Bank. The rules include a new common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 4.5% and a common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets. The final rules also raise the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0% to 6.0% and require a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%. The final rules also implement strict eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments. On July 9, 2013, the FDIC also approved, as an interim final rule, the regulatory capital requirements for U.S. banks, following the actions of the FRB. The FDIC’s rule is identical in substance to the final rules issued by the FRB.

The phase-in period for the final rules began for the Bank on January 1, 2015, with full compliance with all of the final rule’s requirements phased in over a multi-year schedule. The provisions of the final rules are not expected to have a material impact on the Bank.

Reclassification

Reclassification. Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2016 financial statement presentation.

XML

Securities (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Investments, Debt and Equity Securities [Abstract]

Schedule of amortized cost, unrealized gross gains and losses and fair values of securities available for sale

Securities have been classified according to management’s intent. The carrying amount of securities and approximate fair values are as follows (in thousands):

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
At September 30, 2016:
Securities Available for Sale-
Mortgage-backed securities	$	3,288	$	50	$	—		$	3,338
Collateralized mortgage obligations		18,787		26		(220	)		18,593
Total	$	22,075	$	76	$	(220	)	$	21,931
At December 31, 2015:
Securities Available for Sale-
Mortgage-backed securities	$	10,107	$	31	$	(52	)	$	10,086
Collateralized mortgage obligations		15,223		21		(227	)		15,017
SBA Pool Security		644		2		—			646
Total	$	25,974	$	54	$	(279	)	$	25,749

Schedule of sales of securities

The following summarizes the sales of securities (in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September 30
	2016			2015
Proceeds from sales of securities	$	18,028		$	8,255
Gross gains from sale of securities		66			87
Gross losses from sale of securities		(18	)		(27	)
Net gains from sales of securities	$	48		$	60

Schedule of securities with continuous unrealized loss position

Securities with gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, is as follows (in thousands):

	At September 30, 2016
	Over Twelve Months					Less Than Twelve Months
	Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Securities Available for Sale-
Collateralized mortgage obligations	$	(13	)	$	942	$	(207	)	$	12,811

	At December 31, 2015
	Over Twelve Months				Less Than Twelve Months
	Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Securities Available for Sale:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	—	$	(52	)	$	5,526
Collateralized mortgage obligations		—		—		(227	)		11,783
	$	—	$	—	$	(279	)	$	17,309

XML

Loans (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Receivables [Abstract]

Schedule of components of loans

The components of loans are as follows (in thousands):

	At September 30,			At December 31,
	2016			2015
Residential real estate	$	28,244		$	16,203
Multi-family real estate		5,789			3,697
Commercial real estate		31,405			34,771
Land and construction		4,096			5,258
Commercial		13,327			21,770
Consumer		2,098			3,015
Total loans		84,959			84,714
Add (deduct):
Net deferred loan fees, costs and premiums		542			154
Allowance for loan losses		(4,169	)		(2,295	)
Loans, net	$	81,332		$	82,573

Schedule of change in the allowance for loan losses

An analysis of the change in the allowance for loan losses follows (in thousands):

	Residential			Multi-Family			Commercial			Land
	Real			Real			Real			and
	Estate			Estate			Estate			Construction			Commercial			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016:
Beginning balance	$	262		$	39		$	1,012		$	64		$	200		$	156		$	2,507		$	4,240
Provision (credit) for loan losses		58			19			89			(4	)		48			75			(285	)		—
Charge-offs		—			—			(14	)		—			—			(72	)		—			(86	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			6			—			9			—			15
Ending balance	$	320		$	58		$	1,087		$	66		$	248		$	168		$	2,222		$	4,169
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016:
Beginning balance	$	116		$	26		$	1,085		$	77		$	120		$	151		$	720		$	2,295
Provision (credit) for loan losses		204			32			(2,033	)		(29	)		128			196			1,502			—
Charge-offs		—			—			(14	)		—			—			(195	)		—			(209	)
Recoveries		—			—			2,049			18			—			16			—			2,083
Ending balance	$	320			58			1,087			66			248			168			2,222			4,169
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015:
Beginning balance	$	48		$	25		$	1,408		$	34		$	77		$	147		$	440		$	2,179
Provision (credit) for loan losses		181			(14	)		(143	)		14			(36	)		19			(21	)		—
Charge-offs		(195	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(195	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			3			—			3
Ending balance	$	34		$	11		$	1,265		$	48		$	41		$	169		$	419		$	1,987
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015:
Beginning balance	$	66		$	2		$	1,794		$	99		$	17		$	—		$	266		$	2,244
Provision (credit) for loan losses		235			9			(529	)		(51	)		24			159			153			—
Charge-offs		(267	)		—			—			—			—			—			—			(267	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			10			—			10
Ending balance	$	34		$	11		$	1,265		$	48		$	41		$	169		$	419		$	1,987

	Residential		Multi-Family		Commercial		Land
	Real		Real		Real		and
	Estate		Estate		Estate		Construction		Commercial		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
At September 30, 2016:
Individually evaluated for impairment:
Recorded investment	$	379	$	—	$	2,129	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	2,508
Balance in allowance for loan losses	$	—	$	—	$	374	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	374
Collectively evaluated for impairment:
Recorded investment	$	27,865	$	5,789	$	29,276	$	4,096	$	13,327	$	2,098	$	—	$	82,451
Balance in allowance for loan losses	$	320	$	58	$	713	$	66	$	248	$	168	$	2,222	$	3,795
At December 31, 2015:
Individually evaluated for impairment:
Recorded investment	$	1,319	$	—	$	4,273	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	5,592
Balance in allowance for loan losses	$	—	$	—	$	13	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	13
Collectively evaluated for impairment:
Recorded investment	$	14,884	$	3,697	$	30,498	$	5,258	$	21,770	$	3,015	$	—	$	79,122
Balance in allowance for loan losses	$	116	$	26	$	1,072	$	77	$	120	$	151	$	720	$	2,282

Schedule of loans by credit quality indicator

The following summarizes the loan credit quality (in thousands):

		Pass		OLEM (Other Loans Especially Mentioned)		Sub-standard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
At September 30, 2016:
Residential real estate	$	26,226	$	1,639	$	379	$	—	$	—	$	28,244
Multi-family real estate		5,789		—		—		—		—		5,789
Commercial real estate		27,000		1,187		3,218		—		—		31,405
Land and construction		4,050		46		—		—		—		4,096
Commercial		11,582		—		1,745		—		—		13,327
Consumer		2,098		—		—		—		—		2,098
Total	$	76,745	$	2,872	$	5,342	$	—	$	—	$	84,959
At December 31, 2015:
Residential real estate	$	15,132	$	—	$	1,071	$	—	$	—	$	16,203
Multi-family real estate		3,697		—		—		—		—		3,697
Commercial real estate		29,925		573		4,273		—		—		34,771
Land and construction		5,212		46		—		—		—		5,258
Commercial		19,916		—		1,854		—		—		21,770
Consumer		3,015		—		—		—		—		3,015
Total	$	76,897	$	619	$	7,198	$	—	$	—	$	84,714

Schedule of aging analysis of past due loans

Age analysis of past-due loans is as follows (in thousands):

		Accruing Loans
		30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Nonaccrual Loans		Total Loans
At September 30, 2016:
Residential real estate	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	27,865	$	379	$	28,244
Multi-family real estate		—		—		—		—		5,789		—		5,789
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		30,287		1,118		31,405
Land and construction		—		—		—		—		4,096		—		4,096
Commercial		—		—		—		—		13,327		—		13,327
Consumer		—		—		—		—		2,098		—		2,098
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	83,462	$	1,497	$	84,959
At December 31, 2015:
Residential real estate	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	15,132	$	1,071	$	16,203
Multi-family real estate		—		—		—		—		3,697		—		3,697
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		31,539		3,232		34,771
Land and construction		—		—		—		—		5,258		—		5,258
Commercial		—		—		—		—		21,770		—		21,770
Consumer		—		—		—		—		3,015		—		3,015
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	80,411	$	4,303	$	84,714

Schedule of impaired loans

The following summarizes the amount of impaired loans (in thousands):

	At September 30, 2016						At December 31, 2015
		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential real estate	$	379	$	684	$	—	$	1,319	$	2,243	$	—
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		3,232		6,584		—
With related allowance recorded -
Commercial real estate	$	2,129	$	2,292		374		1,041		1,041		13
Total
Residential real estate	$	379	$	684	$	—	$	1,319	$	2,243	$	—
Commercial real estate	$	2,129	$	2,292	$	374	$	4,273	$	7,625	$	13
Total	$	2,508	$	2,976	$	374	$	5,592	$	9,868	$	13

The average net investment in impaired loans and interest income recognized and received on impaired loans are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2016						2015
	Average		Interest		Interest		Average		Interest		Interest
	Recorded		Income		Income		Recorded		Income		Income
	Investment		Recognized		Received		Investment		Recognized		Received
Residential real estate	$	598	$	3	$	16	$	4,532	$	35	$	58
Commercial real estate	$	1,829	$	16	$	22	$	4,898	$	18	$	65
Total	$	2,427	$	19	$	38	$	9,430	$	53	$	123

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016						2015
	Average		Interest		Interest		Average		Interest		Interest
	Recorded		Income		Income		Recorded		Income		Income
	Investment		Recognized		Received		Investment		Recognized		Received
Residential real estate	$	1,057	$	36	$	64	$	5,367	$	104	$	211
Commercial real estate	$	2,483	$	63	$	89	$	5,074	$	57	$	215
Total	$	3,540	$	99	$	153	$	10,441	$	161	$	426

XML

Regulatory Capital (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Regulatory Capital Tables

Schedule of regulatory capital requirements

The following table shows the Bank’s capital amounts and ratios and regulatory thresholds at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in thousands):

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					Minimum To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions					Requirements of Consent Order
	Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%
As of September 30, 2016:
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	$	10,564		12.37	%	$	6,832		8.0	%	$	8,540		10.0	%	$	10,248		12.0	%
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,458		11.07			5,124		6.0			6,832		8.0			N/A		N/A
Common equity Tier I capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,458		11.07			3,843		4.5			5,551		6.5			N/A		N/A
Tier I Capital to Total Assets		9,458		7.78			4,865		4.0			6,081		5.0			9,730		8.0
As of December 31, 2015:
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	$	10,319		11.40	%	$	7,240		8.0	%	$	9,050		10.0	%	$	10,860		12.0	%
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,173		10.14			5,430		6.0			7,240		8.0			N/A		N/A
Common equity Tier I capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,173		10.14			4,073		4.5			5,883		6.5			N/A		N/A
Tier I Capital to Total Assets		9,173		7.59			4,836		4.0			6,045		5.0			9,672		8.0

XML

Earnings (Loss) Per Share (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Net (loss) earnings per share:

Schedule of weighted average number of shares

Basic earnings (loss) per share has been computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share		1,097,644		955,802		1,024,704		951,977

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Schedule of assets measured on a nonrecurring basis

Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are as follows (in thousands):

											Losses
	Fair								Total		Recorded in
	Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Losses		Operations
At September 30, 2016:
Residential real estate	$	379	$	—	$	—	$	379	$	125	$	—
Commercial real estate		850		—		—		850		268	$	268
	$	1,229	$	—	$	—	$	1,229	$	393	$	268
Foreclosed real estate	$	2,412	$	—	$	—	$	2,412	$	1,118	$	—
At December 31, 2015:
Residential real estate	$	423	$	—	$	—	$	423	$	125	$	—
Commercial real estate		2,094		—		—		2,094		2,055		—
	$	2,517	$	—	$	—	$	2,517	$	2,180	$	—
Foreclosed real estate	$	4,029	$	—	$	—	$	4,029	$	1,403	$	260

XML

Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Schedule of estimated fair value of financial instruments

The estimated fair values and fair value measurement method with respect to the Company’s financial instruments were as follows (in thousands):

	At September 30, 2016							At December 31, 2015
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value			Level		Carrying Amount		Fair Value			Level
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	11,440	$	11,440			1	$	10,365	$	10,365			1
Securities available for sale		21,931		21,931			2		25,749		25,749			2
Loans		81,332		81,419			3		82,573		82,429			3
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,018		1,018			3		966		966			3
Accrued interest receivable		389		389			3		462		462			3
Financial liabilities:
Deposit liabilities		90,308		90,647			3		97,571		97,837			3
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		20,500		20,544			3		20,000		20,000			3
Junior subordinated debenture		5,155		N/A	(1)		3		5,155		N/A	(1)		3
Off-balance sheet financial instruments		—		—			—		—		—			3

(1) The Company is unable to determine value based on significant unobservable inputs required in the calculation. Refer to Note 10 for further information.

XML

Regulatory Matters (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Regulatory Matters Tables

Schedule of regulatory capital requirements

The following table shows the Bank’s capital amounts and ratios and regulatory thresholds at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (dollars in thousands):

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					Minimum To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions					Requirements of Consent Order
	Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%			Amount		%
As of September 30, 2016:
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	$	10,564		12.37	%	$	6,832		8.0	%	$	8,540		10.0	%	$	10,248		12.0	%
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,458		11.07			5,124		6.0			6,832		8.0			N/A		N/A
Common equity Tier I capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,458		11.07			3,843		4.5			5,551		6.5			N/A		N/A
Tier I Capital to Total Assets		9,458		7.78			4,865		4.0			6,081		5.0			9,730		8.0
As of December 31, 2015:
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	$	10,319		11.40	%	$	7,240		8.0	%	$	9,050		10.0	%	$	10,860		12.0	%
Tier I Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,173		10.14			5,430		6.0			7,240		8.0			N/A		N/A
Common equity Tier I capital to Risk-Weighted Assets		9,173		10.14			4,073		4.5			5,883		6.5			N/A		N/A
Tier I Capital to Total Assets		9,173		7.59			4,836		4.0			6,045		5.0			9,672		8.0

XML

General (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Junior subordinated debenture	$ 5,155,000	$ 5,155,000
Accrued and unpaid interest payable	$ 1,095,700

XML

Securities (Details Narrative)	Sep. 30, 2016
Investments, Debt and Equity Securities [Abstract]
Investment securities in unrealized loss position	8

XML

Securities (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Amortized Cost	$ 22,075	$ 25,974
Gross Unrealized Gains	76	54
Gross Unrealized Losses	(220)	(279)
Fair Value	21,931	25,749
Mortgage-backed securities [Member]
Amortized Cost	3,288	10,107
Gross Unrealized Gains	50	31
Gross Unrealized Losses		(52)
Fair Value	3,338	10,086
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations [Member]
Amortized Cost	18,787	15,223
Gross Unrealized Gains	26	21
Gross Unrealized Losses	(220)	(227)
Fair Value	$ 18,593	15,017
SBA Pool Security [Member]
Amortized Cost		644
Gross Unrealized Gains		2
Fair Value		$ 646

XML

Securities (Details 1) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Investments, Debt and Equity Securities [Abstract]
Proceeds from sale of securities			$ 18,028	$ 8,255
Gross gains from sale of securities			66	87
Gross losses from sale of securities			(18)	(27)
Net gains from sale of securities	$ 2	$ 28	$ 48	$ 60

XML

Securities (Details 2) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position Less than 12 Months
Gross unrealized Losses		$ (279)
Fair Value		17,309
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations [Member]
Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position Over 12 Months
Gross unrealized Losses	$ (13)
Fair Value	942
Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position Less than 12 Months
Gross unrealized Losses	(207)	(227)
Fair Value	$ 12,811	11,783
Mortgage-backed securities [Member]
Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position Less than 12 Months
Gross unrealized Losses		(52)
Fair Value		$ 5,526

XML

Loans (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Loans, gross	$ 84,959		$ 84,714
Net deferred loan fees, costs and premiums	542		154
Allowance for loan losses	(4,169)	$ (4,240)	(2,295)	$ (1,987)	$ (2,179)	$ (2,244)
Loans, net	81,332		82,573
Residential real estate [Member]
Loans, gross	28,244		16,203
Allowance for loan losses	(320)	(262)	(116)	(34)	(48)	(66)
Multi-family real estate [Member]
Loans, gross	5,789		3,697
Allowance for loan losses	(58)	(39)	(26)	(11)	(25)	(2)
Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Loans, gross	31,405		34,771
Allowance for loan losses	(1,087)	(1,012)	(1,085)	(1,265)	(1,408)	(1,794)
Land and construction [Member]
Loans, gross	4,096		5,258
Allowance for loan losses	(66)	(64)	(77)	(48)	(34)	(99)
Commercial [Member]
Loans, gross	13,327		21,770
Allowance for loan losses	(248)	(200)	(120)	(41)	(77)	$ (17)
Consumer [Member]
Loans, gross	2,098		3,015
Allowance for loan losses	$ (168)	$ (156)	$ (151)	$ (169)	$ (147)

XML

Loans (Details 1) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment
Beginning balance	$ 4,240	$ 2,179	$ 2,295	$ 2,244
Charge-offs	(86)	(195)	(209)	(267)
Recoveries	15	3	2,083	10
Ending balance	4,169	1,987	4,169	1,987
Residential real estate [Member]
Activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment
Beginning balance	262	48	116	66
Provision (credit) for loan losses	58	181	204	235
Charge-offs		(195)		(267)
Ending balance	320	34	320	34
Multi-family real estate [Member]
Activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment
Beginning balance	39	25	26	2
Provision (credit) for loan losses	19	(14)	32	9
Ending balance	58	11	58	11
Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment
Beginning balance	1,012	1,408	1,085	1,794
Provision (credit) for loan losses	89	(143)	(2,033)	(529)
Charge-offs	(14)		(14)
Recoveries			2,049
Ending balance	1,087	1,265	1,087	1,265
Land and construction [Member]
Activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment
Beginning balance	64	34	77	99
Provision (credit) for loan losses	(4)	14	(29)	(51)
Recoveries	6		18
Ending balance	66	48	66	48
Commercial [Member]
Activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment
Beginning balance	200	77	120	17
Provision (credit) for loan losses	48	(36)	128	24
Ending balance	248	41	248	41
Consumer [Member]
Activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment
Beginning balance	156	147	151
Provision (credit) for loan losses	75	19	196	159
Charge-offs	(72)		(195)
Recoveries	9	3	16	10
Ending balance	168	169	168	169
Unallocated [Member]
Activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment
Beginning balance	2,507	440	720	266
Provision (credit) for loan losses	(285)	(21)	1,502	153
Ending balance	$ 2,222	$ 419	$ 2,222	$ 419

XML

Loans (Details 2) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Allowance balance attributed to loans:
Recorded investment, Individually evaluated for impairment	$ 2,508	$ 5,592
Allowance for loan losses, Individually evaluated for impairment	374	13
Recorded investment, Collectively evaluated for impairment	82,451	79,122
Allowance for loan losses, Collectively evaluated for impairment	3,795	2,282
Residential real estate [Member]
Allowance balance attributed to loans:
Recorded investment, Individually evaluated for impairment	379	1,319
Recorded investment, Collectively evaluated for impairment	27,865	14,884
Allowance for loan losses, Collectively evaluated for impairment	320	116
Multi-family real estate [Member]
Allowance balance attributed to loans:
Recorded investment, Collectively evaluated for impairment	5,789	3,697
Allowance for loan losses, Collectively evaluated for impairment	58	26
Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Allowance balance attributed to loans:
Recorded investment, Individually evaluated for impairment	2,129	4,273
Allowance for loan losses, Individually evaluated for impairment	374	13
Recorded investment, Collectively evaluated for impairment	29,276	30,498
Allowance for loan losses, Collectively evaluated for impairment	713	1,072
Land and construction [Member]
Allowance balance attributed to loans:
Recorded investment, Collectively evaluated for impairment	4,096	5,258
Allowance for loan losses, Collectively evaluated for impairment	66	77
Commercial [Member]
Allowance balance attributed to loans:
Recorded investment, Collectively evaluated for impairment	13,327	21,770
Allowance for loan losses, Collectively evaluated for impairment	248	120
Consumer [Member]
Allowance balance attributed to loans:
Recorded investment, Collectively evaluated for impairment	2,098	3,015
Allowance for loan losses, Collectively evaluated for impairment	168	151
Unallocated [Member]
Allowance balance attributed to loans:
Allowance for loan losses, Collectively evaluated for impairment	$ 2,222	$ 720

XML

Loans (Details 3) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Risk rated loans	$ 84,959	$ 84,714
Pass [Member]
Risk rated loans	76,745	76,897
OLEM (Other Loans Especially Mentioned) [Member]
Risk rated loans	2,872	619
Substandard [Member]
Risk rated loans	5,342	7,198
Residential real estate [Member]
Risk rated loans	28,244	16,203
Residential real estate [Member] | Pass [Member]
Risk rated loans	26,226	15,132
Residential real estate [Member] | OLEM (Other Loans Especially Mentioned) [Member]
Risk rated loans	1,639
Residential real estate [Member] | Substandard [Member]
Risk rated loans	379	1,071
Multi-family real estate [Member]
Risk rated loans	5,789	3,697
Multi-family real estate [Member] | Pass [Member]
Risk rated loans	5,789	3,697
Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Risk rated loans	31,405	34,771
Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Pass [Member]
Risk rated loans	27,000	29,925
Commercial Real Estate [Member] | OLEM (Other Loans Especially Mentioned) [Member]
Risk rated loans	1,187	573
Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Substandard [Member]
Risk rated loans	3,218	4,273
Land and construction [Member]
Risk rated loans	4,096	5,258
Land and construction [Member] | Pass [Member]
Risk rated loans	4,050	5,212
Land and construction [Member] | OLEM (Other Loans Especially Mentioned) [Member]
Risk rated loans	46	46
Commercial [Member]
Risk rated loans	13,327	21,770
Commercial [Member] | Pass [Member]
Risk rated loans	11,582	19,916
Commercial [Member] | Substandard [Member]
Risk rated loans	1,745	1,854
Consumer [Member]
Risk rated loans	2,098	3,015
Consumer [Member] | Pass [Member]
Risk rated loans	$ 2,098	$ 3,015

XML

Loans (Details 4) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Aging analysis of past due loans
Current Loans	$ 83,462	$ 80,411
Nonaccrual Loans	1,497	4,303
Total loans	84,959	84,714
Consumer [Member]
Aging analysis of past due loans
Current Loans	2,098	3,015
Total loans	2,098	3,015
Residential real estate [Member]
Aging analysis of past due loans
Current Loans	27,865	15,132
Nonaccrual Loans	379	1,071
Total loans	28,244	16,203
Multi-family real estate [Member]
Aging analysis of past due loans
Current Loans	5,789	3,697
Total loans	5,789	3,697
Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Aging analysis of past due loans
Current Loans	30,287	31,539
Nonaccrual Loans	1,118	3,232
Total loans	31,405	34,771
Land and construction [Member]
Aging analysis of past due loans
Current Loans	4,096	5,258
Total loans	4,096	5,258
Commercial [Member]
Aging analysis of past due loans
Current Loans	13,327	21,770
Total loans	$ 13,327	$ 21,770

XML

Loans (Details 5) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Loans with an allowance recorded:
Related Allowance	$ 374	$ 13
Total recorded investment	2,508	5,592
Total unpaid principal balance	2,976	9,868
Residential real estate [Member]
Loans with no related allowance recorded:
Recorded Investment , With no related allowance recorded	379	1,319
Unpaid Principal Balance, With no related allowance recorded	684	2,243
Loans with an allowance recorded:
Total recorded investment	379	1,319
Total unpaid principal balance	684	2,243
Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Loans with no related allowance recorded:
Recorded Investment , With no related allowance recorded		3,232
Unpaid Principal Balance, With no related allowance recorded		6,584
Loans with an allowance recorded:
Recorded Investment , With related allowance recorded	2,129	1,041
Unpaid Principal Balance, With related allowance recorded	2,292	1,041
Related Allowance	374	13
Total recorded investment	2,129	4,273
Total unpaid principal balance	$ 2,292	$ 7,625

XML

Loans (Details 6) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Impaired Loans:
Impaired loans - Average Recorded Investment	$ 2,427	$ 9,430	$ 3,540	$ 10,441
Impaired loans - Interest Income Recognized	19	53	99	161
Impaired loans - Interest Income Received	38	123	153	426
Residential real estate [Member]
Impaired Loans:
Impaired loans - Average Recorded Investment	598	4,532	1,057	5,367
Impaired loans - Interest Income Recognized	3	35	36	104
Impaired loans - Interest Income Received	16	58	64	211
Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Impaired Loans:
Impaired loans - Average Recorded Investment	1,829	4,898	2,483	5,074
Impaired loans - Interest Income Recognized	16	18	63	57
Impaired loans - Interest Income Received	$ 22	$ 65	$ 89	$ 215

XML

Regulatory Capital (Details)	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Actual
Tier 1 Capital (to total average assets) ratio	7.78%	7.59%
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets) ratio	11.07%	10.14%
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)	11.07%	10.14%
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets) ratio	12.37%	11.40%
Consent Order
Minimum Tier 1 capital to total average assets under consent order, ratio	8.00%	8.00%
Minimum Total capital to risk-weighted assets under consent order, ratio	12.00%

XML

Earnings (Loss) Per Share (Details) - shares	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Net (loss) earnings per share:
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share	1,097,644	955,802	1,024,704	951,977

XML

Stock-Based Compensation (Details Narrative) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($) shares	Sep. 30, 2015 USD ($) shares	May 01, 2016 shares	Dec. 27, 2011 shares
Reverse stock split ratio	0.10
Common stock issued as compensation to directors | $	$ 32	$ 229
Shares available for grant	149,482
Post-Split [Member]
Common stock issued as compensation to directors, shares	7,559	25,112
2011 Compensation Plan [Member]
Shares authorized for grant			210,000	105,000

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Foreclosed real estate, Fair Value	$ 2,412	$ 4,029
Signficiant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Loans receivable, Fair Value	81,419	82,429
Fair Value [Member]
Loans receivable, Fair Value	81,419	82,429
Nonrecurring [Member]
Cumulative Fair value losses	393	2,180
Losses recorded in operations during the period	268
Nonrecurring [Member] | Foreclosed Real Estate [Member]
Cumulative Fair value losses	1,118	1,403
Losses recorded in operations during the period		260
Nonrecurring [Member] | Signficiant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Loans receivable, Fair Value	1,229	2,517
Foreclosed real estate, Fair Value	2,412	4,029
Nonrecurring [Member] | Fair Value [Member]
Loans receivable, Fair Value	1,229	2,517
Foreclosed real estate, Fair Value	2,412	4,029
Nonrecurring [Member] | Residential real estate [Member]
Cumulative Fair value losses	125	125
Nonrecurring [Member] | Residential real estate [Member] | Signficiant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Loans receivable, Fair Value	379	423
Nonrecurring [Member] | Residential real estate [Member] | Fair Value [Member]
Loans receivable, Fair Value	379	423
Nonrecurring [Member] | Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Cumulative Fair value losses	268	2,055
Losses recorded in operations during the period	268
Nonrecurring [Member] | Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Signficiant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Loans receivable, Fair Value	850	2,094
Nonrecurring [Member] | Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Fair Value [Member]
Loans receivable, Fair Value	$ 850	$ 2,094

XML

Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Financial assets:
Securities available for sale		$ 21,931	$ 25,749
Accrued interest receivable		389	462
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		11,440	10,365
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
Financial assets:
Securities available for sale		21,931	25,749
Signficiant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Financial assets:
Loans		81,419	82,429
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,018	966
Accrued interest receivable		389	462
Financial liabilities:
Deposit liabilities		90,647	97,837
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		20,544	20,000
Carrying Amount [Member]
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		11,440	10,365
Securities available for sale		21,931	25,749
Loans		81,332	82,573
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,018	966
Accrued interest receivable		389	462
Financial liabilities:
Deposit liabilities		90,308	97,571
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		20,500	20,000
Junior subordinated debenture		5,155	5,155
Fair Value [Member]
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		11,440	10,365
Securities available for sale		21,931	25,749
Loans		81,419	82,429
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,018	966
Accrued interest receivable		389	462
Financial liabilities:
Deposit liabilities		90,647	97,837
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		20,544	20,000
Junior subordinated debenture	[1]

[1] The Company is unable to determine value based on significant unobservable inputs required in the calculation. Refer to Note 10 for further information.

XML

Regulatory Matters (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Actual
Total Capital	$ 10,564	$ 10,319
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets) ratio	12.37%	11.40%
Tier 1 Capital	$ 9,458	$ 9,173
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets) ratio	11.07%	10.14%
Common equity Tier I capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	$ 9,458	$ 9,173
Common equity Tier I capital to Risk-Weighted Assets, ratio	11.07%	10.14%
Tier 1 Capital	$ 9,458	$ 9,173
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets) ratio	7.78%	7.59%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
Minimum amount of capital for adequacy purposes	$ 6,832	$ 7,240
Minimum amount of capital for adequacy purposes, ratio	8.00%	8.00%
Minimum amount of Tier 1 Capital for adequacy purposes	$ 5,124	$ 5,430
Minimum amount of Tier 1 Capital for adequacy purposes, ratio	6.00%	6.00%
Common equity Tier I capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	$ 3,843	$ 4,073
Common equity Tier I capital to Risk-Weighted Assets, ratio	4.50%	4.50%
Minimum amount of Tier 1 Capital for adequacy purposes	$ 4,865	$ 4,836
Minimum amount of Tier 1 Capital for adequacy purposes, ratio	4.00%	4.00%
Minimum to be Well Capitalized
Minimum Tier 1 Capital required to be well-capitalized	$ 8,540	$ 9,050
Minimum Tier 1 Capital required to be well-capitalized, ratio	10.00%	10.00%
Minimum Tier 1 Capital required to be well-capitalized	$ 6,832	$ 7,240
Minimum Tier 1 Capital required to be well-capitalized, ratio	8.00%	8.00%
Common equity Tier I capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	$ 5,551	$ 5,883
Common equity Tier I capital to Risk-Weighted Assets, ratio	6.50%	6.50%
Minimum Capital required to be well-capitalized	$ 6,081	$ 6,045
Minimum Capital required to be well-capitalized, ratio	5.00%	5.00%
Consent Order
Minimum Capital required under consent order	$ 10,248	$ 10,860
Minimum Capital required under consent order, ratio	12.00%	12.00%
Minimum Tier 1 Capital required under consent order	$ 9,730	$ 9,672
Minimum Tier 1 Capital required under consent order, ratio	8.00%	8.00%

XML

Junior Subordinated Debenture (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]
Junior subordinated debenture	$ 5,155,000	$ 5,155,000
Debt term	30 years
Debt Instrument Interest Rate Stated	6.40%
Debt interest rate terms	Three-month LIBOR rate plus 2.45%
Basis spread on variable rate	2.45%
Interest rate during period	3.13%
Deferred interest payments	$ 1,095,700

XML

Reverse Common Stock Split (Details Narrative)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016
Equity [Abstract]
Reverse stock split ratio	0.10

XML

Loan Loss Recovery (Details Narrative) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Loan Loss Recovery
Recovery of previously charged-off amounts to the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses	$ 1,800
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses	$ 4,169	$ 4,240	$ 2,295	$ 1,987	$ 2,179	$ 2,244

XML

Reclassification (Details Narrative) - Chairman [Member] $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016 USD ($) shares
Common stock granted | shares	46,926
Share-based compensation expense | $	$ 200