10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission file number: 1-32362

OTELCO INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware	52-2126395
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
505 Third Avenue East, Oneonta, Alabama	35121
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

(205) 625-3574

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

N/A

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes        x        No        ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes        x        No        ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company) ¨ Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes        ¨        No        x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes        x        No        ¨

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at November 7, 2016
Class A Common Stock ($0.01 par value per share)	3,283,177
Class B Common Stock ($0.01 par value per share)	0

OTELCO INC.

FORM 10-Q

For the three-month period ended September 30, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION		2
Item 1.	Financial Statements	2
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (unaudited)	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)	4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	11
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	20
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	20
PART II OTHER INFORMATION		21
Item 6.	Exhibits	21

i

Unless the context otherwise requires, the words “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” and “Otelco” refer to Otelco Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries as of September 30, 2016.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. These statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the timing or nature of future operating or financial performance or other events. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that we have made in light of our experience in the industry in which we operate, as well as our perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, you should be aware that many factors could affect our actual financial condition or results of operations, impact our strategic review and exploration process, including the outcome of any decisions we may make regarding strategic alternatives, or cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements.

1

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

OTELCO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share par value and share amounts)

(unaudited)

	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,333		$	6,884
Accounts receivable:
Due from subscribers, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $217 and $258, respectively		5,108			5,185
Other		1,722			1,722
Materials and supplies		2,232			1,906
Prepaid expenses		1,312			2,775
Deferred income taxes		57			57
Total current assets		19,764			18,529
Property and equipment, net		48,324			49,811
Goodwill		44,976			44,976
Intangibles assets, net		1,909			2,363
Investments		1,826			1,846
Other assets		241			259
Total assets	$	117,040		$	117,784
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	1,159		$	1,818
Accrued expenses		5,880			4,567
Advance billings and payments		1,381			1,418
Customer deposits		68			68
Current maturity of long-term notes payable, net of debt issuance cost		2,929			2,203
Total current liabilities		11,417			10,074
Deferred income taxes		26,163			26,163
Advance billings and payments		588			628
Other liabilities		22			27
Long-term notes payable, less current maturities and debt issuance costs		90,609			97,052
Total liabilities		128,799			133,944
Stockholders’ deficit
Class A Common Stock $.01 par value-authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 3,283,177 and 3,015,099 shares, respectively		33			30
Class B Common Stock, $.01 par value-authorized 250,000 shares; issued and outstanding 0 and 232,780 shares, respectively		—			2
Additional paid in capital		4,082			3,881
Accumulated deficit		(15,874	)		(20,073	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(11,759	)		(16,160	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	117,040		$	117,784

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

OTELCO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Revenues	$	17,389		$	17,850		$	52,111		$	53,385
Operating expenses
Cost of services		7,958			8,301			23,963			24,964
Selling, general and administrative expenses		2,888			2,458			7,871			7,544
Depreciation and amortization		1,982			2,181			6,071			6,694
Total operating expenses		12,828			12,940			37,905			39,202
Income from operations		4,561			4,910			14,206			14,183
Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(2,728	)		(1,949	)		(7,931	)		(5,988	)
Other income		—			14			624			1,060
Total other expense		(2,728	)		(1,935	)		(7,307	)		(4,928	)
Income before income tax expense		1,833			2,975			6,899			9,255
Income tax expense		(708	)		(1,125	)		(2,700	)		(3,615	)
Net income	$	1,125		$	1,850		$	4,199		$	5,640
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic		3,283,177			3,239,306			3,283,177			3,239,306
Diluted		3,384,308			3,289,679			3,380,178			3,285,502
Basic net income per common share	$	0.34		$	0.57		$	1.28		$	1.74
Diluted net income per common share	$	0.33		$	0.56		$	1.24		$	1.72

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

OTELCO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	4,199		$	5,640
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		5,328			5,756
Amortization		743			938
Amortization of loan costs		929			665
Loss on extinguishment of debt		155			—
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable		271			350
Stock-based compensation		311			283
Payment in kind interest - subordinated debt		194			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable		(194	)		(577	)
Material and supplies		(326	)		(82	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		1,481			1,919
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		654			666
Advance billings and payments		(77	)		(31	)
Other liabilities		(5	)		(3	)
Net cash from operating activities		13,663			15,524
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Acquisition and construction of property and equipment		(4,111	)		(4,568	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(4,111	)		(4,568	)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Loan origination costs		(5,242	)		(25	)
Principal repayment of long-term notes payable		(102,052	)		(10,120	)
Proceeds from loan refinancing		100,300			—
Tax withholdings paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units		(109	)		—
Net cash used in financing activities		(7,103	)		(10,145	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		2,449			811
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		6,884			5,082
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	9,333		$	5,893
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	6,065		$	5,322
Income taxes paid	$	1,197		$	1,726
Conversion of Class B common stock to Class A common stock	$	2		$	—
Issuance of Class A common stock	$	1		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

September 30, 2016

(unaudited)

1. Organization and Basis of Financial Reporting

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries, all of which are either directly or indirectly wholly owned. These include: Blountsville Telephone LLC; Brindlee Mountain Telephone LLC; CRC Communications LLC (“CRC”); Granby Telephone LLC; Hopper Telecommunications LLC; Mid-Maine Telecom LLC; Mid-Maine TelPlus LLC; Otelco Mid-Missouri LLC (“MMT”); and its wholly owned subsidiary I-Land Internet Services LLC; Otelco Telecommunications LLC; Otelco Telephone LLC (“OTP”); Pine Tree Telephone LLC; Saco River Telephone LLC; Shoreham Telephone LLC; and War Telephone LLC.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of the aforesaid subsidiaries after elimination of all material intercompany balances and transactions. The unaudited operating results for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016 or any other period.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. The interim condensed consolidated financial information herein is unaudited. The information reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods included in this report.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

During 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) has issued Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”) 2016-01 through 2016-15. Except for ASU 2016-02, 2016-08, 2016-09, 2016-10, 2016-12 and 2016-15, which are discussed below, these ASUs provide technical corrections or simplification to existing guidance and to specialized industries or entities and therefore have minimal, if any, impact on the Company.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This ASU requires lessees to recognize most leases on the balance sheet. The provisions of this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the requirements of this ASU and has not yet determined the impact of the adoption on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation–Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The objective of this ASU is to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for any entity in any interim or annual period. The Company adopted this ASU as of March 31, 2016 and that adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This ASU requires that an entity recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU also provides a more robust framework for revenue issues and improves comparability of revenue recognition practices across industries. This ASU was the product of a joint project between the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard. This guidance was to be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption not permitted. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date. This ASU confirmed a one-year delay in the effective date of ASU 2014-09, making the effective date for the Company the first quarter of fiscal 2018 instead of the first quarter of fiscal 2017. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Consideration (Reporting Revenues Gross versus Net). This ASU is further guidance to ASU 2014-09, and clarifies principal versus agent considerations. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. This ASU is also further guidance to ASU 2014-09, and clarifies the identification of performance obligations. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. This ASU is also further guidance to ASU 2014-09, and clarifies assessing the narrow aspects of recognizing revenue. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of ASUs 2014-09, 2016-08, 2016-10 and 2016-12 on its condensed consolidated financial statements and has not yet

5

determined the method by which the Company will adopt ASU 2014-09.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This ASU addresses how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows, and other Topics. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The implementation of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Refinancing

On January 25, 2016, the Company entered into a senior loan agreement (the “Senior Loan Agreement”), providing for a five year term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $85.0 million and a five year $5.0 million revolving credit facility, and a subordinated loan agreement (the “Subordinated Loan Agreement”), providing for a five and a half year term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $15.0 million. On February 17, 2016, the Subordinated Loan Agreement was amended to increase the aggregate principal amount available for borrowing thereunder to $15.3 million, and the Company borrowed $85.0 million under the term loan facility of the Senior Loan Agreement and $15.3 million under the Subordinated Loan Agreement. The Company used the borrowings under the Senior Loan Agreement and the Subordinated Loan Agreement to, among other things, pay all amounts due, including principal, interest and fees, and satisfy in full all of its obligations under its previous credit facility (the “Previous Credit Facility”), which was scheduled to mature on April 30, 2016. As a result of the repayment of the Previous Credit Facility, all of the shares of the Company’s Class B common stock were automatically converted into an equal number of shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. The term loan facility under the Senior Loan Agreement requires principal payments of $1.0 million quarterly, beginning on April 1, 2016. Principal amounts outstanding under the Subordinated Loan Agreement will generally not be due until maturity. The Company recorded costs of $15 thousand and write-off of loan costs of $140 thousand in connection with this refinancing.

Reclassifications

Certain items in the prior year’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to 2016 presentation. In addition, the Company has corrected a typographical mistake in the Company’s audited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015. Specifically, current liabilities as shown in its audited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 was presented as $1,181 thousand but should have been $1,818 thousand, or an increase of $637 thousand. The typographical mistake did not affect the total current liabilities as of December 31, 2015, as set forth in the audited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015. Based on its evaluation, the Company concluded that it is not probable that the analysis of a reasonable person relying on the financial statements would have been changed or influenced by the mistake or its correction.

2. Notes Payable

Notes payable consists of the following (in thousands, except percentages) as of:

	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Third amended and restated term credit facility; Antares Capital (formerly General Electric Capital Corporation); variable interest rate of 6.50% at December 31, 2015. The Previous Credit Facility was secured by the total assets of the subsidiary guarantors. The Previous Credit Facility was fully repaid on February 17, 2016.	$	—	$	99,255
Less: Current portion of long-term debt, net of debt issuance cost of $0 and $797, respectively		—		(2,203	)
Long-term notes payable less current maturities (net)	$	—	$	97,052

6

	Current			Long-term			September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Senior Loan Agreement with Cerberus Business Finance, LLC; variable interest rate of 8.75% at September 30, 2016, interest is monthly, paid in arrears on the first business day of each month. The Senior Loan Agreement is secured by the total assets of the subsidiary guarantors. The unpaid balance is due February 17, 2021.	$	4,000		$	79,000		$	83,000		$	—
Debt issuance cost		(1,071	)		(3,092	)		(4,163	)		—
Senior notes payable, net of debt issuance cost	$	2,929		$	75,908		$	78,837		$	—

	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Subordinated Loan Agreement with NewSpring Mezzanine Capital III, L.P.; fixed interest rate due monthly of 12.00% at September 30, 2016. Payment in Kind (“PIK”) interest rate of 2.00% per annum. PIK interest accrued is added to the principal amount then outstanding on the last business day of each quarter. The unpaid balance is due August 17, 2021.	$	15,300		$	—
PIK interest added to principal		194			—
Less: Long-term portion of debt issuance cost		(793	)		—
Long-term notes payable, net of debt issuance cost	$	14,701		$	—

Associated with the Senior Loan Agreement, the Company has capitalized and amortized deferred financing cost using the effective interest method. The Company has capitalized $4.9 million in deferred financing cost associated with the Senior Loan Agreement. Amortization expense for the deferred financing cost associated with the Senior Loan Agreement was $704 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Associated with the Subordinated Loan Agreement, the Company has capitalized and amortized deferred financing cost using the effective interest method. The Company has capitalized $892 thousand in deferred financing cost associated with the Subordinated Loan Agreement. Amortization expense for the deferred financing cost associated with the Subordinated Loan Agreement was $99 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Associated with the Previous Credit Facility, the Company had capitalized and amortized deferred financing cost using the effective interest method. The Company had capitalized $2.7 million in deferred financing cost associated with the Previous Credit Facility. Amortization expense for the deferred financing cost associated with the third amendment and restatement of the Previous Credit Facility was $141 thousand and $665 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company wrote off $140 thousand of prior deferred financing cost and incurred $15 thousand in external legal fees during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as a result of the extinguishment of the Previous Credit Facility, which is included in interest expense.

The Company had a revolving credit facility on December 31, 2015 of $5.0 million associated with the Previous Credit Facility. There was no balance outstanding as of December 31, 2015. The facility was terminated on February 17, 2016. The Company paid a commitment fee of 0.50% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears, on the unused portion of the revolver loan under the Previous Credit Facility. The commitment fee expense was $3 thousand and $19 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The revolving credit facility associated with the Company’s Senior Loan Agreement had a maximum borrowing capacity of $5.0 million on September 30, 2016. The revolving credit facility is available until February 17, 2021. There was no balance outstanding as of September 30, 2016. The Company pays a monthly fee of 0.75% per annum on the unused portion of the revolver loan under the Senior Loan Agreement, payable in arrears. The fee expense was $24 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

7

Maturities of notes payable for the next five years and thereafter, assuming no annual excess cash flow payments and the PIK interest, are as follows (in thousands):

2016 (remaining)	$	1,000
2017		4,000
2018		4,000
2019		4,000
2020		4,000
Thereafter		81,300
Total	$	98,300

In addition, PIK interest of $1,772 thousand associated with the Subordinated Loan Agreement will be paid at maturity. A total of $5,758 thousand of debt issuance cost is amortized over the life of the loans and is recorded net of the notes payable on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The Company’s notes payable agreements are subject to certain financial covenants and restrictions on indebtedness, financial guarantees, business combinations and other related items. As of September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants and restrictions.

3. Income Tax

As of each of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of $0 and $25 thousand, respectively. The Company had no alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards as of September 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015. The Company establishes valuation allowances when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had no valuation allowance recorded.

The effective income tax rate as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was 39.1% and 39.8%, respectively.

4. Net Income per Common Share

Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per common share reflects the potential dilution that would occur should all of the shares of Class A common stock underlying restricted stock units (“RSUs”), as well as all of the shares of Class A common stock, for which the Company has accrued an expense, that may be delivered pursuant to the purchase agreement relating to the assets of Reliable Networks of Maine, LLC (“Reliable Networks”), be issued.

A reconciliation of the common shares for purposes of the calculation of the Company’s basic and diluted net income per common share is as follows (weighted average number of common shares outstanding in whole numbers and net income in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic		3,283,177		3,239,306		3,283,177		3,239,306
Effect of dilutive securities		101,131		50,373		97,001		46,196
Weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares - diluted		3,384,308		3,289,679		3,380,178		3,285,502
Net income	$	1,125	$	1,850	$	4,199	$	5,640
Net income per common share - basic	$	0.34	$	0.57	$	1.28	$	1.74
Net income per common share - diluted	$	0.33	$	0.56	$	1.24	$	1.72

8

5. Revenue Concentrations

Revenues for interstate access services are based on reimbursement of costs and an allowed rate of return. Revenues of this nature are received from the National Exchange Carrier Association in the form of monthly settlements. Such revenues amounted to 18.4% and 16.9% of the Company’s total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

6. Commitments and Contingencies

From time to time, the Company may be involved in various claims, legal actions and regulatory proceedings incidental to and in the ordinary course of business, including administrative hearings of the Alabama Public Service Commission, the Maine Public Utilities Commission, the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Cable, the Missouri Public Service Commission, the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission, the Vermont Public Service Board and the West Virginia Public Service Commission, relating primarily to rate making. In addition, the Company may be involved in similar proceedings with interconnection carriers and the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”). Currently, except as set forth below, none of the Company’s legal proceedings are expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.

Sprint Communications L.P. (“Sprint”), MCI Communications Services, Inc. (“MCI”) and Verizon Select Services, Inc. (“Verizon”) filed more than 60 lawsuits in federal courts across the United States alleging that over 400 local exchange carriers (“LECs” or “LEC Defendants”) overcharged Sprint, MCI and Verizon for so-called intraMTA traffic (wireless phone calls that originate and terminate in the same metropolitan transit area). The lawsuits seek a refund of previously-paid access charges for intraMTA traffic, as well as a discount related to intraMTA traffic on a going-forward basis. One of the Company’s subsidiaries, MMT, was named as a defendant in two of the lawsuits that are being brought before the District Court for the Western District of Missouri (one filed on May 2, 2014 by Sprint and the other filed on September 5, 2014 by MCI and Verizon). In addition, one of the Company’s other subsidiaries, OTP, was named as a defendant in a lawsuit relating to these issues filed by MCI and Verizon in the District Court for the District of Delaware on September 5, 2014. As all of the lawsuits relating to these issues raise the same fundamental questions of law, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has consolidated the lawsuits in the District Court for the Northern District of Texas (the “Court”) for all pre-trial proceedings. On November 17, 2015, the Court issued a memorandum opinion and order dismissing the federal-law claims with prejudice, dismissing the state-law claims but granting leave to re-plead said claims, and denying the Defendants’ request to refer the matter to the FCC. The Court continues to handle pre-trial motions related to some LEC Defendants’ counterclaims, with decisions on those matters and final summary judgment motions not scheduled to occur until April of 2017. After all pre-trial matters are addressed, Sprint, MCI and Verizon have indicated they will appeal the Court’s November 17, 2015 decision making. Accordingly, it is not possible to determine at this time whether these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.

On November 10, 2014, a large coalition of the LEC Defendants, including MMT and OTP, filed a petition for declaratory ruling with the FCC seeking a ruling by the FCC that: (1) any traffic intentionally routed over Interexchange carrier (“IXC”) trunks by IXCs should be subject to access charges; (2) only carriers with specific agreements with an LEC may use alternative billing arrangements; (3) federal tariffing rules require the LECs to assess access charges for switched access traffic routed through Feature Group D trunks; and (4) the IXCs may not engage in self-help by refusing to pay the LEC Defendants’ properly assessed access charges. On March 11, 2015, the LEC Defendants filed their reply brief with the FCC. No timeline has been established for a decision by the FCC and the FCC has given no indication that it intends to issue a ruling in the near future. Accordingly, it is not possible to determine at this time whether this action will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. 

7. Stock Plans and Stock Associated with Acquisition

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company granted RSUs underlying 119,655 shares of Class A common stock. The Company granted RSUs underlying 122,534 shares of Class A common stock on May 15, 2015. As of September 30, 2016, 212,213 RSUs remained outstanding. These RSUs (or a portion thereof) vest with respect to each recipient over a one to three year period from the date of grant, provided the recipient remains in the employment or service of the Company as of the vesting date and, in selected instances, certain performance criteria are attained. Additionally, these RSUs (or a portion thereof) could vest earlier in the event of a change in control of the Company, or upon involuntary termination without cause. These grants are made primarily to executive-level personnel at the Company and, as a result, no compensation costs have been capitalized.

9

The following table summarizes RSU activity as of September 30, 2016:

	RSUs			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2015		155,761		$	4.78
Granted		119,655		$	4.40
Vested		(56,728	)	$	4.80
Forfeited or cancelled		(6,475	)	$	4.71
Outstanding at September 30, 2016		212,213		$	4.56

CRC acquired substantially all of the assets of Reliable Networks on January 2, 2014. Pursuant to the purchase agreement relating to the Reliable Networks acquisition, Class A common stock was issued to the former owner of Reliable Networks in 2015 and will be issued to the former owner of Reliable Networks in 2017, contingent on Reliable Networks achieving certain financial objectives and certain other conditions being satisfied, including that certain individuals must be employed by the Company or any of its subsidiaries and in good standing on the last day of the applicable year (the “Earn-Out”). For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company delivered 68,233 shares of Class A common stock to the former owner of Reliable Networks on March 12, 2015 as a result of the Earn-Out. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the applicable Earn-Out criteria was not met and no shares of Class A common stock were issued as a result of the Earn-Out. No shares of Class A common stock were earned or issued as a result of the Earn-Out during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Stock-based compensation expense related to RSUs and the Earn-Out was $311 thousand and $283 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Accounting standards require that the Company estimate forfeitures for RSUs and the Earn-Out and reduce compensation expense accordingly. The Company has reduced its expense by the assumed forfeiture rate and will evaluate actual experience against the assumed forfeiture rate going forward. The forfeiture rate has been developed using historical performance metrics which could impact the number of the final share issuance of Class A common stock.

As of September 30, 2016, the unrecognized total compensation cost related to unvested RSUs was $630 thousand. That cost is expected to be recognized by the end of 2019.

10

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

General

Since 1999, we have acquired and operate eleven rural local exchange carriers (“RLECs”) serving subscribers in north central Alabama, central Maine, western Massachusetts, central Missouri, western Vermont and southern West Virginia. We are the sole wireline telephone services provider for three of the rural communities we serve. We also operate a competitive local exchange carrier (“CLEC”) serving subscribers in Maine, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire. Our services include a broad suite of communications and information services including local and long distance telephone services; internet and data services; network access; other telephone related services; cloud hosting and professional engineering services for small and mid-sized companies who rely on mission-critical software applications; and video and security (in some markets). We view, manage and evaluate the results of operations from the various telecommunications products and services as one company and therefore have identified one reporting segment as it relates to providing segment information. As of September 30, 2016, we operated 95,327 access line equivalents.

The Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) issued its Universal Service Fund and Intercarrier Compensation Order (the “FCC Order”) in November 2011. This order makes substantial changes in the way telecommunications carriers are compensated for serving high cost areas and for completing traffic with other carriers. We began seeing the significant impact of the FCC Order to our business in July 2012, with additional impacts beginning in July 2013, July 2014 and July 2015. The initial consequence to our business was to reduce access revenue from intrastate calling in Maine and other states where intrastate rates were higher than interstate rates. Nationwide, all switched access rates will be reduced annually through July 2017 to less than $0.01 per minute. A portion of this revenue loss for our RLEC properties is returned to us through the Connect America Fund. There is no recovery mechanism for the lost revenue in our CLEC.

In March 2016, the FCC issued its Universal Service Fund Reform Order for rate-of-return carriers (the “USF Order”). This order fundamentally changes the way that rural rate-of-return carriers obtain Universal Service Fund (“USF”) support. Specifically, the USF Order will reduce the authorized rate-of-return from 11.25% to 9.75% over a six-year phase-in period beginning July 1, 2016, impose a cap of $2 billion on USF available to rural rate-of-return carriers, introduce a new voluntary path under which rate-of-return carriers may elect model-based support for a term of ten years, impose new broadband build-out requirements on carriers in return for receiving USF, establish limitations on capital and operating expenses supported by USF for those rate-of-return carriers that continue to utilize the modified legacy mechanisms for USF distribution and introduce the concept of a reverse auction for areas that rate-of-return carriers are unable to serve. The USF Order requires carriers electing voluntary model-based support to notify the FCC of their election by November 1, 2016. We have elected to accept the new model-based support for all of our RLECs that are eligible, and we completed the notification of this election on October 31, 2016. As currently established, this election will provide a slight positive impact on us, beginning in 2017. The FCC may revise the model-based support amounts after it receives and reviews all of the rate-of-return companies’ elections. If the FCC makes a revised model-based support offer that is lower than the offer made at the time of our election, we will have 30 days to accept the new offer, or continue with the modified legacy support mechanism.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in Item 1 of Part I and the other financial information appearing elsewhere in this report. The following discussion and analysis addresses our financial condition and results of operations on a consolidated basis.

Revenue Sources

We offer a wide range of telecommunications, data, entertainment and managed services to our subscribers. More than half of our access line equivalents serve business customers. Our residential customers purchase packages of services that are delivered and billed together. Our CLEC subscribers contract with us for selected services that meet their specific telecommunications requirements. Our revenues are derived from six sources:

· Local services. We receive revenues from providing local exchange telecommunications services in our eleven rural territories and on a competitive basis throughout Maine, western Massachusetts and New Hampshire through both wholesale and retail channels. These revenues include monthly subscription charges for basic service, calling beyond the local territory on a fixed price and on a per minute basis, local private line services and enhanced calling features, such as voicemail, caller identification, call waiting and call forwarding. We also provide billing and collections services for other carriers under contract and receive revenues from directory advertising. A significant portion of our rural subscribers take bundled service plans which contain multiple services, including unlimited domestic calling, for a flat monthly fee.

· Network access. We receive revenues from charges established to compensate us for the origination, transport and termination of calls of long distance, wireless and other interexchange carriers. These include subscriber line charges

11

imposed on end users and switched and special access charges paid by carriers. Switched access charges for long distance services within Alabama, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire, Vermont and West Virginia have historically been based on rates approved by the Alabama Public Service Commission, the Maine Public Utilities Commission, the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Cable, the Missouri Public Service Commission, the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission, the Vermont Public Service Board and the West Virginia Public Service Commission, respectively, where appropriate. The FCC Order preempted the state commissions’ authority to set terminating intrastate access service rates, and required companies with terminating access rates higher than interstate rates to reduce terminating intrastate access rates to a rate equal to interstate access service rates by July 1, 2013 and to move to “bill and keep” arrangements by July 1, 2020, which will eliminate access charges between carriers. The FCC Order prescribes a recovery mechanism for the recovery of any decrease in intrastate terminating access revenues through the Connect America Fund for RLEC companies. This recovery is limited to 95% of the previous year’s revenue requirement. Switched and special access charges for interstate and international services are based on rates approved by the FCC.

· Internet. We receive revenues from monthly recurring charges for digital high-speed data lines, legacy dial-up internet access and ancillary services such as web hosting, computer virus protection and Classifax, which is our virtual faxing solution.

· Transport services. We receive monthly recurring revenues for the rental of fiber to transport data and other telecommunications services in Maine and New Hampshire.

· Video and security. We offer basic, digital, high-definition, digital video recording, video on demand and pay per view cable television services, including IP television (“IPTV”), to a portion of our telephone service territory in Alabama. We provide medical alert and home security systems in Alabama and Missouri, and selected over-the-top video services in Vermont.

· Managed services. We provide private/hybrid cloud hosting services, as well as consulting and professional engineering services, for mission-critical software applications for small and mid-sized North American companies. Revenues are generated from monthly recurring hosting IaaS fees, monthly maintenance fees, à la carte professional engineering services and pay-as-you-use SaaS fees. Services are domiciled in two diverse owned data centers. Our operations in-rack and professional engineering services are covered by a SOC 2 Type II audit covering security, availability and confidentiality, while our data center operations are covered by a separate SOC 2 Type II audit covering security and availability.

Access Line and Customer Trends

The number of voice and data access lines serves as a fundamental factor in determining revenue stability for a telecommunications provider. Reflecting general trends in the RLEC industry, the number of residential voice access lines we serve has been decreasing when normalized for territory acquisitions, whereas business access lines have remained generally steady or grown. We expect that these trends will continue, and may be potentially impacted by competition from cable and co-operative electric providers in our RLEC territories, the availability of alternative telecommunications products, such as cellular and IP-based services, as well as economic conditions generally. Historically, these residential trends have been partially offset by the growth of residential data access lines, also called digital high-speed internet access service. As the penetration of data lines in our RLEC markets has increased, residential data line growth no longer offsets the decline in residential voice lines. Our competitive carrier voice and data access lines have grown as we continue to offer new services and further penetrate our chosen markets. Our ability to continue this growth and our response to the rural trends will have an important impact on our future revenues. Our primary strategy consists of leveraging our strong incumbent market position, selling additional services to our rural customer base, such as alarm and medical alert monitoring services, and providing better service and support levels and a broader suite of services, including managed services and hybrid/cloud-based hosting, than the incumbent and other competitive carriers to our CLEC customer base.

12

Key Operating Statistics

(unaudited)

	As of
	December 31,				March 31,		June 30,		September 30,		% Change from
	2014		2015		2016		2016		2016		June 30, 2016
Business/Enterprise
CLEC
Voice lines		19,324		18,606		18,069		17,650		17,409		(1.4	)%
HPBX seats		10,029		10,740		10,746		10,800		11,291		4.5	%
Data lines		3,313		3,629		3,621		3,638		3,704		1.8	%
Wholesale network lines		2,968		2,743		2,680		2,651		2,633		(0.7	)%
Classifax		80		140		158		163		174		6.7	%
RLEC
Voice lines		15,506		16,123		16,139		16,030		16,678		4.0	%
Data lines		1,587		1,539		1,532		1,652		1,654		0.1	%
Access line equivalents(1)		52,807		53,520		52,945		52,584		53,543		1.8	%
Residential
CLEC
Voice lines		275		225		221		219		209		(4.6	)%
Data lines		363		282		281		278		262		(5.8	)%
RLEC
Voice lines		25,569		23,143		22,604		22,140		21,502		(2.9	)%
Data lines		20,206		20,089		20,031		20,009		19,811		(1.0	)%
Access line equivalents(1)		46,413		43,739		43,137		42,646		41,784		(2.0	)%
Otelco access line equivalents(1)		99,220		97,259		96,082		95,230		95,327		0.1	%
Video		3,852		3,648		3,708		3,671		3,338		(9.1	)%
Security systems		243		326		337		343		357		4.1	%
Other internet lines		3,202		2,840		2,794		2,684		2,637		(1.8	)%

(1) We define access line equivalents as retail and wholesale voice lines (including Classifax, our virtual faxing solution) and data lines (including cable modems, digital subscriber lines and dedicated data access trunks).

Our business and enterprise access line equivalents increased by 959 during third quarter 2016, or 1.8%, compared to June 30, 2016. The growth in Hosted PBX lines in our New England CLEC and business services for schools in our Alabama RLEC territory accounted for the growth. Business and enterprise access line equivalents accounted for over 56% of our access line equivalents as of September 30, 2016. Residential access line equivalents declined 862 during third quarter 2016, or 2.0%, compared to June 30, 2016, reflecting industry-wide trends. Residential data lines declined at a much slower pace than residential voice access lines during third quarter 2016, as most customers disconnecting their residential voice lines chose to retain their data services.

We offer competitively-priced location-specific bundled service packages, many including unlimited domestic calling, tailored to the varying telecommunications requirements of our customers. Competitive pricing and bundling of services have led our long distance service to be the choice of the majority of our voice customers in the rural markets we serve. In addition, almost all of our CLEC customers have selected us as their long distance carrier. Our cable television, IPTV and over-the-top customers decreased 9.1% to 3,338 as of September 30, 2016, from 3,671 as of June 30, 2016, reflecting AT&T’s reseller channel decisions in its DirecTV® division. Our other internet customers decreased 1.8% to 2,637 as of September 30, 2016 compared to 2,684 as of June 30, 2016. This also includes the subscribers we service outside of our RLEC telephone service area in Maine and central Missouri. Approximately 78% of the other internet customers are served by high-speed data capability from Otelco. We offer security monitoring and medical alert services in Alabama and Missouri. During third quarter 2016, we installed 14 systems for an increase of 4.1% as of September 30, 2016 when compared to June 30, 2016.

13

Our Rate and Pricing Structure

Our CLEC enterprise pricing is based on market requirements. We combine varying services to meet individual customer requirements, including technical support and managed services, and provide multi-year contracts which are both market sensitive for the customer and stabilizing for our sales process.

Our RLECs operate in six states and are regulated in varying degrees by the respective state regulatory authorities. The impact on pricing flexibility varies by state. Our rates for other services we provide, including cable, IPTV, satellite, long distance, data lines and dial-up and high-speed internet access, are not price regulated. The market for competitive services, such as wireless, also impacts our ability to adjust prices. With the increase of bundled services offerings, including unlimited long distance, pricing for individual services takes on reduced importance to revenue stability. We expect this trend to continue into the immediate future.

Categories of Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses are categorized as cost of services; selling, general and administrative expenses; and depreciation and amortization.

Cost of services. This includes expenses for salaries, wages and benefits relating to our telephone central office and outside plant operation, maintenance, sales and customer service; other plant operations, maintenance and administrative costs; network access costs; data center operations; and costs of services for long distance, cable television, internet and directory services.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. This includes expenses for salaries, wages and benefits and contract service payments (for example, legal fees) relating to engineering, financial, human resources and corporate operations; information management expenses, including billing; allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable; expenses for travel, lodging and meals; internal and external communications costs; insurance premiums; stock exchange and banking fees; and postage.

Depreciation and amortization. This includes depreciation of our telecommunications, cable and internet networks and equipment, and amortization of intangible assets. Certain of these amortization expenses continue to be deductible for tax purposes.

Our Ability to Control Operating Expenses

We strive to control expenses in order to maintain our operating margins. As our revenue shifts to non-regulated services and CLEC customers and our residential RLEC revenue declines, operating margins decrease, reflecting the lower margins associated with non-regulated services. Reductions over time in USF and Intercarrier Compensation payments based on the FCC Order may not be fully offset by expense control.

14

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth our results of operations as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Revenues
Local services		34.5	%		35.0	%		34.3	%		35.3	%
Network access		30.4			31.2			30.7			31.2
Internet		22.9			21.0			22.4			20.8
Transport services		6.8			7.6			7.1			7.5
Video and security		4.1			3.8			4.2			3.9
Managed services		1.3			1.4			1.3			1.3
Total revenues		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Operating expenses
Cost of services		45.8	%		46.5	%		46.0	%		46.8	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		16.6			13.8			15.1			14.1
Depreciation and amortization		11.4			12.2			11.7			12.5
Total operating expenses		73.8			72.5			72.8			73.4
Income from operations		26.2			27.5			27.2			26.6
Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(15.7	)		(10.9	)		(15.2	)		(11.2	)
Other income (expense), net		0.0			(0.0	)		1.2			2.0
Total other expense		(15.7	)		(10.9	)		(14.0	)		(9.2	)
Income before income tax		10.5			16.6			13.2			17.4
Income tax expense		(4.0	)		(6.2	)		(5.1	)		(6.8	)
Net income		6.5	%		10.4	%		8.1	%		10.6	%

Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 Compared to Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015

Total revenues. Total revenues decreased 2.6% in the three months ended September 30, 2016 to $17.4 million from $17.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015. Total revenues decreased 2.4% in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to $52.1 million from $53.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in revenue due to the FCC Order and the loss of residential access lines account for the majority of the decline. The tables below provide the components of our revenues for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same periods of 2015.

For the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Change
	2016		2015		Amount			Percent
	(dollars in thousands)
Local services	$	6,003	$	6,255	$	(252	)		(4.0	)%
Network access		5,279		5,564		(285	)		(5.1	)
Internet		3,981		3,748		233			6.2
Transport services		1,179		1,356		(177	)		(13.1	)
Video and security		719		686		33			4.8
Managed services		228		241		(13	)		(5.4	)
Total	$	17,389	$	17,850	$	(461	)		(2.6	)

Local services. Local services revenue decreased 4.0% in the three months ended September 30, 2016 to $6.0 million from $6.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015. Hosted PBX and fiber rental revenue increased $0.2 million. The decline in RLEC residential voice access lines and the impact of the FCC Order, which reduces or eliminates intrastate and local cellular revenue, account for a decrease of $0.3 million. A portion of the RLEC decrease is recovered through the Connect America Fund, which is categorized as interstate access revenue. Long distance and special line revenue decreased $0.2 million.

15

Network access. Network access revenue decreased 5.1% in the three months ended September 30, 2016 to $5.3 million from $5.6 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015. The Connect America Fund and end user charges increased $0.1 million. This increase was offset by declines in special access charges of $0.1 million, interstate and intrastate switched access charges of $0.2 million and end-user fees of $0.1 million.

Internet. Internet revenue increased 6.2% in the three months ended September 30, 2016 to $4.0 million from $3.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015. Increased broadband speed, higher equipment rental fees and pricing accounted for the increase.

Transport services. Transport services revenue decreased 13.1% in the three months ended September 30, 2016 to $1.2 million from $1.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015. The reduction of carrier circuits and market repricing accounted for the decline.

Video and security. Video and security revenue increased 4.8% in the three months ended September 30, 2016 to just over $0.7 million from just under $0.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015. Increases in security and IPTV deployment and cable pricing were partially offset by decreases in pay per view revenue and digital cable subscribers and the end of our DirecTV® resale agreement.

Managed services. Managed services revenue decreased 5.4% to remain at just over $0.2 million in both the three months ended September 30, 2016 and the three months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease was in equipment sales and groupware services.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Change
	2016		2015		Amount			Percent
	(dollars in thousands)
Local services	$	17,851	$	18,853	$	(1,002	)		(5.3	)%
Network access		16,016		16,658		(642	)		(3.9	)
Internet		11,680		11,082		598			5.4
Transport services		3,713		4,029		(316	)		(7.8	)
Video and security		2,171		2,084		87			4.2
Managed services		680		679		1			0.1
Total		52,111		53,385	$	(1,274	)		(2.4	)

Local services. Local services revenue decreased 5.3% in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to $17.9 million from $18.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Hosted PBX and fiber rental revenue increased $0.2 million. The decline in RLEC residential voice access lines and the impact of the FCC Order account for a decrease of $0.7 million. A portion of the RLEC decrease is recovered through the Connect America Fund, which is categorized as interstate access revenue. Long distance and special line revenue decreased $0.5 million.

Network access. Network access revenue decreased 3.9% in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to $16.0 million from $16.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The Connect America Fund increased $0.3 million. This increase was offset by declines in special access charges of $0.5 million, interstate and intrastate switched access charges of $0.3 million and end-user fees of $0.1 million.

Internet. Internet revenue increased 5.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to $11.7 million from $11.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Increased broadband speed, higher equipment rental fees, the introduction of its satellite-based Internet service iSpeed in Missouri and pricing accounted for the increase.

Transport services. Transport services revenue decreased 7.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to $3.7 million from $4.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The reduction of carrier circuits and market repricing accounted for the decline.

Video and security. Video and security revenue increased 4.2% in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to $2.2 million from $2.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Increases in security and IPTV deployment and cable pricing were partially offset by decreases in pay per view revenue and digital cable subscribers and the end of our DirecTV® resale agreement.

Managed services. Managed services revenue was $0.7 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015. The increase in engineering and professional services revenue was offset by the decline in cloud hosting revenue.

16

Operating expenses. Operating expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2016 decreased 0.9% to $12.8 million from $12.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015. Operating expenses in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 decreased 3.3% to $37.9 million from $39.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The tables below provide the components of our operating expenses for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same periods of 2015.

For the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Change
	2016		2015		Amount			Percent
	(dollars in thousands)
Cost of services	$	7,958	$	8,301	$	(343	)		(4.1	)%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		2,888		2,458		430			17.5
Depreciation and amortization		1,982		2,181		(199	)		(9.1	)
Total	$	12,828	$	12,940	$	(112	)		(0.9	)

Cost of services. Cost of services decreased 4.1% to $8.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016 from $8.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015. Internet, access, toll and digital circuit equipment expense decreased $0.3 million and other expense associated with our New England operations optimization decreased by $0.1 million. Cable television programming costs and computer expense increased $0.1 million.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 17.5% to $2.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016 from $2.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015. Board of Directors related project expenses of $0.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016 had no comparable expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2015. Small increases in external relations, insurance and uncollectible expense accounted for the balance of the increase.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization decreased 9.1% to $2.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016 from $2.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015. New England CLEC decreased $0.1 million and Alabama cable depreciation and the amortization of other intangible assets decreased $0.1 million.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015

	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Change
	2016		2015		Amount			Percent
	(dollars in thousands)
Cost of services	$	23,963	$	24,964	$	(1,001	)		(4.0	)%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		7,871		7,544		327			4.3
Depreciation and amortization		6,071		6,694		(623	)		(9.3	)
Total	$	37,905	$	39,202	$	(1,297	)		(3.3	)

Cost of services. Cost of services decreased 4.0% to $24.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from $25.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Toll and digital circuit equipment expense decreased by $0.4 million, access expense decreased by $0.3 million, pole, power and conduit expense decreased by $0.3 million, other expense associated with our New England operations optimization decreased by $0.3 million and internet expense decreased by $0.1 million. Performance assurance plan billing credits received from Fairpoint Communications in Maine decreased by $0.2 million, effectively increasing our cost as their service levels showed further improvement and the related credits decreased. In addition, cable television programming costs and computer expense increased $0.2 million.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 4.3% to $7.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from $7.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Board of Directors related project expenses of $0.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 had no comparable expenses in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The earlier timing of audit expense accounted for an increase of $0.1 million, increased loan fees accounted for $0.1 million and higher non-cash stock compensation cost accounted for $0.1 million. These increases were partially offset by reductions in uncollectible, external relations, human resources and property tax expense of $0.3 million.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization decreased 9.3% to $6.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from $6.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. New England CLEC depreciation decreased

17

$0.2 million, the amortization of other intangible assets decreased $0.2 million, Alabama cable television and internet depreciation decreased $0.2 million and New England RLEC depreciation decreased $0.1 million. Alabama and Missouri RLEC depreciation increased by $0.1 million.

For the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Change
	2016			2015			Amount			Percent
	(dollars in thousands)
Interest expense	$	(2,728	)	$	(1,949	)	$	779			40.0	%
Other income		—			14			(14	)		NM	*
Income tax expense		(708	)		(1,125	)		(417	)		(37.1	)
* Not meaningful

Interest expense. Interest expense increased 40.0% to $2.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016 from $1.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015. Higher interest rates on our new loan facilities accounted for an increase of $0.7 million and the increase in loan cost amortization accounted for an increase of $0.1 million.

Other income. Other income was not material in either the three months ended September 30, 2016 or three months ended September 30, 2015.

Income tax expense. Provision for income tax expense was $0.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $1.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015. The effective income tax rate as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was 39.1% and 39.8%, respectively. In December 2015, changes in tax law related to bonus depreciation were enacted, impacting both the three months ended September 30, 2016 and the three months ended September 30, 2015.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Change
	2016			2015			Amount			Percent
	(dollars in thousands)
Interest expense	$	(7,931	)	$	(5,988	)	$	1,943			32.4	%
Other income		624			1,060			(436	)		41.1
Income tax expense		(2,699	)		(3,615	)		(916	)		(25.3	)

Interest expense. Interest expense increased 32.4% to $7.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from $6.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Higher interest rates on our new loan facilities accounted for an increase of $1.5 million and the increased loan cost amortization accounted for an increase of $0.4 million.

Other income. Other income decreased 41.1% to $0.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 from $1.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in the annual CoBank dividend in first quarter 2016 accounted for the decrease.

Income tax expense. Provision for income tax expense was $2.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $3.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The effective income tax rate as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was 39.1% and 39.8%, respectively. In December 2015, changes in tax law related to bonus depreciation were enacted, impacting both the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Net income. As a result of the foregoing, there was net income of $1.1 million and $1.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As a result of the foregoing, there was net income of $4.2 million and $5.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The differences are primarily attributable to lower residential and access revenues in both the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and the smaller CoBank dividend received in first quarter 2016, partially offset by continued cost reductions.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our liquidity needs arise primarily from: (i) interest and principal payments related to our credit facilities; (ii) capital expenditures for investment in our business; and (iii) working capital requirements.

18

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we generated cash from our business to invest in additional property and equipment of $4.1 million, pay loan origination costs of $5.2 million, pay scheduled interest on our debt of $6.1 million and pay income taxes of $0.5 million. As described in greater detail below, we fully repaid our previous credit facility that was scheduled to mature in April 2016 with borrowings under two new credit agreements, both of which are scheduled to mature in 2021. After reflecting the above changes in our business, cash increased to $9.3 million as of September 30, 2016 when compared to $6.9 million as of December 31, 2015.

Cash flows from operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 amounted to $13.7 million compared to $15.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in net income associated with the CoBank dividend and the reduction in prepaid expenses and other assets and accounts receivable primarily accounted for the difference.

Cash flows used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 were $4.1 million compared to $4.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Lower investment in property and equipment in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 accounted for the difference.

Cash flows used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 were $7.1 million compared to $10.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2015, reflecting changes associated with our credit facilities, primarily loan origination costs for the facilities and the change in principal payment date from the last day of the quarter with respect to the former facility to the first day of the following quarter with respect to the current senior facility.

We do not invest in financial instruments as part of our business strategy.

As mentioned above, our prior credit facility was scheduled to mature in April 2016. However, on January 25, 2016, we entered into a new senior credit facility, providing for a five year term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $85.0 million and a five year $5.0 million revolving credit facility, and a new subordinated credit facility, providing for a five and a half year term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $15.0 million. On February 17, 2016, the subordinated credit facility was amended to increase the aggregate principal amount available for borrowing thereunder to $15.3 million, and we borrowed $85.0 million under the term loan facility of the senior credit facility and $15.3 million under the subordinated credit facility. We used the borrowings under the credit facilities to, among other things, pay all amounts due, including principal, interest and fees, and satisfy in full all of our obligations under our previous credit facility. Under the current senior credit facility, excess cash flow payments are made annually rather than quarterly as they were under our previous credit facility.

We use consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“Consolidated EBITDA”) as an operational performance measurement. Consolidated EBITDA, as presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, corresponds to the definition of Consolidated EBITDA in our credit facilities. Consolidated EBITDA, as presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is a supplemental measure of our performance that is not required by, or presented in accordance with, accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). The lenders under our credit facilities use this measure to determine compliance with credit facility requirements. We report Consolidated EBITDA in our quarterly earnings press release to allow current and potential investors to understand this performance metric and because we believe that it provides current and potential investors with helpful information with respect to our operating performance. However, Consolidated EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income or any other performance measures derived in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our presentation of Consolidated EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Consolidated EBITDA for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, and its reconciliation to net income, is reflected in the table below (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015			2016		2015
Net income	$	1,125	$	1,850		$	4,199	$	5,640
Add:       Depreciation		1,757		1,913			5,328		5,756
Interest expense less interest income		2,408		1,730			6,847		5,320
Interest expense - amortize loan cost		320		218			1,083		665
Income tax expense		708		1,125			2,700		3,615
Amortization - intangibles		225		268			743		938
Stock-based compensation (earn-out)		—		—			—		71
Stock-based compensation (board & senior management)		112		72			312		213
Other excluded expense		—		(12	)		—		8
Loan fees		40		25			164		75
Consolidated EBITDA	$	6,695	$	7,189		$	21,376	$	22,301

19

Recent Developments

We have retained The Bank Street Group LLC as our financial advisor to explore strategic alternatives that would enhance stockholder value. These alternatives could include a broad range of merger and sale transactions, among other things. However, there can be no assurance that our review of strategic alternatives will result in any transaction. We do not currently intend to make further public comment regarding our strategic review and exploration process, except as required by applicable law.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1, Organization and Basis of Financial Reporting, to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a description of the recent accounting pronouncements that are applicable to us.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Our short-term excess cash balance is invested in short-term commercial paper. We do not invest in any derivative or commodity type instruments. Accordingly, we are subject to minimal market risk on our investments.

Interest rates applicable to the term loans and the revolving loans under our senior credit facility are set at a margin over a LIBOR rate (which is defined as the higher of  (1) LIBOR and (2) 1.0% per annum) or a reference rate (which is generally defined as the highest of  (1) 3.5% per annum, (2) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% per annum, (3) the LIBOR rate plus 1.00% per annum and (4) the prime rate). Accordingly, we are exposed to interest rate risk. If our current senior credit facility had been in place for the full period, and assuming $85.0 million was outstanding under that facility from January 1, 2016 through February 16, 2016 (the date immediately before the date that we actually drew down funds under that facility), a one percentage point change in market interest rates from the September 30, 2016 interest rates would have resulted in an approximately $282 thousand increase in the interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

With the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2016.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the three months ended September 30, 2016 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

20

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibits

See Exhibit Index.

21

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: November 7, 2016	OTELCO INC.
	By:	/s/ Curtis L. Garner, Jr.
		Curtis L. Garner, Jr.
		Chief Financial Officer

22

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description
31.1	Certificate pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Chief Executive Officer
31.2	Certificate pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Chief Financial Officer
32.1	Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Executive Officer
32.2	Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Financial Officer
101	The following information from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

23

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Robert J. Souza, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Otelco Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 7, 2016

/s/ Robert J. Souza

Robert J. Souza

Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Curtis L. Garner, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Otelco Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 7, 2016

/s/ Curtis L. Garner, Jr.

Curtis L. Garner, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Souza, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert J. Souza

Robert J. Souza

Chief Executive Officer

November 7, 2016

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curtis L. Garner, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Curtis L. Garner, Jr.

Curtis L. Garner, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer

November 7, 2016

XML

Document And Entity Information - shares	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Nov. 06, 2016
Document Information [Line Items]
Entity Registrant Name	OTELCO INC.
Entity Central Index Key	0001288359
Trading Symbol	otel
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding (in shares)		3,283,177
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2016
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2016
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Amendment Flag	false

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Current Period Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Common Class A [Member]
Stockholders' deficit
Common Stock, Value	$ 33	$ 30
Common Class B [Member]
Stockholders' deficit
Common Stock, Value		2
Cash and cash equivalents	9,333	6,884
Due from subscribers, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $217 and $258, respectively	5,108	5,185
Other	1,722	1,722
Materials and supplies	2,232	1,906
Prepaid expenses	1,312	2,775
Deferred income taxes	57	57
Total current assets	19,764	18,529
Property and equipment, net	48,324	49,811
Goodwill	44,976	44,976
Intangible assets, net	1,909	2,363
Investments	1,826	1,846
Other assets	241	259
Total assets	117,040	117,784
Accounts payable	1,159	1,818
Accrued expenses	5,880	4,567
Advance billings and payments	1,381	1,418
Customer Deposits	68	68
Senior notes payable, net of debt issuance cost	2,929	2,203
Total current liabilities	11,417	10,074
Deferred income taxes	26,163	26,163
Advance billings and payments	588	628
Other liabilities	22	27
Long-term notes payable, less current maturities and debt issuance costs	90,609	97,052
Total liabilities	128,799	133,944
Additional paid in capital	4,082	3,881
Accumulated deficit	(15,874)	(20,073)
Total stockholders' deficit	(11,759)	(16,160)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$ 117,040	$ 117,784

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Current Period Unaudited) (Parentheticals) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Common Class A [Member]
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, authorized (in shares)	10,000,000	10,000,000
Common stock, issued (in shares)	3,283,177	3,015,099
Common stock, outstanding (in shares)	3,283,177	3,015,099
Common Class B [Member]
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, authorized (in shares)	250,000	250,000
Common stock, issued (in shares)	0	232,780
Common stock, outstanding (in shares)	0	232,780
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$ 217	$ 258

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Revenues	$ 17,389	$ 17,850	$ 52,111	$ 53,385
Operating expenses
Cost of services	7,958	8,301	23,963	24,964
Selling, general and administrative expenses	2,888	2,458	7,871	7,544
Depreciation and amortization	1,982	2,181	6,071	6,694
Total operating expenses	12,828	12,940	37,905	39,202
Income from operations	4,561	4,910	14,206	14,183
Other income (expense)
Interest expense	(2,728)	(1,949)	(7,931)	(5,988)
Other income		14	624	1,060
Total other expense	(2,728)	(1,935)	(7,307)	(4,928)
Income before income tax expense	1,833	2,975	6,899	9,255
Income tax expense	(708)	(1,125)	(2,700)	(3,615)
Net income	$ 1,125	$ 1,850	$ 4,199	$ 5,640
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic (in shares)	3,283,177	3,239,306	3,283,177	3,239,306
Diluted (in shares)	3,384,308	3,289,679	3,380,178	3,285,502
Basic net income per common share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.34	$ 0.57	$ 1.28	$ 1.74
Diluted net income per common share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.33	$ 0.56	$ 1.24	$ 1.72

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$ 4,199	$ 5,640
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	5,328	5,756
Amortization	743	938
Amortization of loan costs	929	665
Loss on extinguishment of debt	155
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable	271	350
Stock-based compensation	311	283
Payment in kind interest - subordinated debt	194
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable	(194)	(577)
Material and supplies	(326)	(82)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	1,481	1,919
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	654	666
Advance billings and payments	(77)	(31)
Other liabilities	(5)	(3)
Net cash from operating activities	13,663	15,524
Cash flows used in investing activities:
Acquisition and construction of property and equipment	(4,111)	(4,568)
Net cash used in investing activities	(4,111)	(4,568)
Cash flows used in financing activities:
Loan origination costs	(5,242)	(25)
Principal repayment of long-term notes payable	(102,052)	(10,120)
Proceeds from loan refinancing	100,300
Tax withholdings paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units	(109)
Net cash used in financing activities	(7,103)	(10,145)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	2,449	811
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	6,884	5,082
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	9,333	5,893
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	6,065	5,322
Income taxes paid	1,197	1,726
Conversion of Class B common stock to Class A common stock	2
Issuance of Class A common stock	$ 1

XML

Note 1 - Organization and Basis of Financial Reporting

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure [Text Block]

1. Organization and Basis of Financial Reporting

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries, all of which are either directly or indirectly wholly owned. These include: Blountsville Telephone LLC; Brindlee Mountain Telephone LLC; CRC Communications LLC (“CRC”); Granby Telephone LLC; Hopper Telecommunications LLC; Mid-Maine Telecom LLC; Mid-Maine TelPlus LLC; Otelco Mid-Missouri LLC (“MMT”); and its wholly owned subsidiary I-Land Internet Services LLC; Otelco Telecommunications LLC; Otelco Telephone LLC (“OTP”); Pine Tree Telephone LLC; Saco River Telephone LLC; Shoreham Telephone LLC; and War Telephone LLC.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of the aforesaid subsidiaries after elimination of all material intercompany balances and transactions. The unaudited operating results for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016 or any other period.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. The interim condensed consolidated financial information herein is unaudited. The information reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods included in this report.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

During 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) has issued Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”) 2016-01 through 2016-15. Except for ASU 2016-02, 2016-08, 2016-09, 2016-10, 2016-12 and 2016-15 which are discussed below, these ASUs provide technical corrections or simplification to existing guidance and to specialized industries or entities and therefore have minimal, if any, impact on the Company.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,

Leases (Topic 842).

This ASU requires lessees to recognize most leases on the balance sheet. The provisions of this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the requirements of this ASU and has not yet determined the impact of the adoption on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09

, Compensation–Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

. The objective of this ASU is to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for any entity in any interim or annual period. The Company adopted this ASU as of March 31, 2016 and that adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)

. This ASU requires that an entity recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU also provides a more robust framework for revenue issues and improves comparability of revenue recognition practices across industries. This ASU was the product of a joint project between the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard. This guidance was to be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption not permitted. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14,

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date.

This ASU confirmed a one-year delay in the effective date of ASU 2014-09, making the effective date for the Company the first quarter of fiscal 2018 instead of the first quarter of fiscal 2017. 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08,

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Consideration (Reporting Revenues Gross versus Net)

. This ASU is further guidance to ASU 2014-09, and clarifies principal versus agent considerations. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10,

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing.

This ASU is also further guidance to ASU 2014-09, and clarifies the identification of performance obligations. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12,

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients.

This ASU is also further guidance to ASU 2014-09, and clarifies assessing the narrow aspects of recognizing revenue. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of ASUs 2014-09, 2016-08, 2016-10 and 2016-12 on its condensed consolidated financial statements and has not yet determined the method by which the Company will adopt ASU 2014-09.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15

,

Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230

):

Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments

. This ASU addresses how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows, and other Topics. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The implementation of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Refinancing

On January 25, 2016, the Company entered into a senior loan agreement (the “Senior Loan Agreement”), providing for a five year term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $85.0 million and a five year $5.0 million revolving credit facility, and a subordinated loan agreement (the “Subordinated Loan Agreement”), providing for a five and a half year term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $15.0 million. On February 17, 2016, the Subordinated Loan Agreement was amended to increase the aggregate principal amount available for borrowing thereunder to $15.3 million, and the Company borrowed $85.0 million under the term loan facility of the Senior Loan Agreement and $15.3 million under the Subordinated Loan Agreement. The Company used the borrowings under the Senior Loan Agreement and the Subordinated Loan Agreement to, among other things, pay all amounts due, including principal, interest and fees, and satisfy in full all of its obligations under its previous credit facility (the “Previous Credit Facility”), which was scheduled to mature on April 30, 2016. As a result of the repayment of the Previous Credit Facility, all of the shares of the Company’s Class B common stock were automatically converted into an equal number of shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. The term loan facility under the Senior Loan Agreement requires principal payments of $1.0 million quarterly, beginning on April 1, 2016. Principal amounts outstanding under the Subordinated Loan Agreement will generally not be due until maturity. The Company recorded costs of $15 thousand and write-off of loan costs of $140 thousand in connection with this refinancing.

Reclassifications

Certain items in the prior year’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to 2016 presentation. In addition, the Company has corrected a typographical mistake in the Company’s audited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015. Specifically, current liabilities as shown in its audited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 was presented as $1,181 thousand but should have been $1,818 thousand, or an increase of $637 thousand. The typographical mistake did not affect the total current liabilities as of December 31, 2015, as set forth in the audited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015. Based on its evaluation, the Company concluded that it is not probable that the analysis of a reasonable person relying on the financial statements would have been changed or influenced by the mistake or its correction.

XML

Note 2 - Notes Payable

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Debt Disclosure [Text Block]

2. Notes Payable

Notes payable consists of the following (in thousands, except percentages) as of:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
Third amended and restated term credit facility; Antares Capital (formerly General Electric Capital Corporation); variable interest rate of 6.50% at December 31, 2015. The Previous Credit Facility was secured by the total assets of the subsidiary guarantors. The Previous Credit Facility was fully repaid on February 17, 2016.	$	—	$	99,255
Less: Current portion of long-term debt, net of debt issuance cost of $0 and $797, respectively		—		(2,203	)
Long-term notes payable less current maturities (net)	$	—	$	97,052

							September 30,			December 31,
	Current			Long-term			2016			2015
Senior Loan Agreement with Cerberus Business Finance, LLC; variable interest rate of 8.75% at September 30, 2016, interest is monthly, paid in arrears on the first business day of each month. The Senior Loan Agreement is secured by the total assets of the subsidiary guarantors. The unpaid balance is due February 17, 2021.	$	4,000		$	79,000		$	83,000		$	—
Debt issuance cost		(1,071	)		(3,092	)		(4,163	)		—
Senior notes payable, net of debt issuance cost	$	2,929		$	75,908		$	78,837		$	—

	September 30,			December 31,
	2016			2015
Subordinated Loan Agreement with NewSpring Mezzanine Capital III, L.P.; fixed interest rate due monthly of 12.0 0% at September 30, 2016. Payment in Kind (“PIK”) interest rate of 2.00% per annum. PIK interest accrued is added to the principal amount then outstanding on the last business day of each quarter. The unpaid balance is due August 17, 2021.	$	15,300		$	—
PIK interest added to principal		194			—
Less: Long-term portion of debt issuance cost		(793	)		—
Long-term notes payable, net of debt issuance cost	$	14,701		$	—

Associated with the Senior Loan Agreement, the Company has capitalized and amortized deferred financing cost using the effective interest method. The Company has capitalized $4.9 million in deferred financing cost associated with the Senior Loan Agreement. Amortization expense for the deferred financing cost associated with the Senior Loan Agreement was $704 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Associated with the Subordinated Loan Agreement, the Company has capitalized and amortized deferred financing cost using the effective interest method. The Company has capitalized $892 thousand in deferred financing cost associated with the Subordinated Loan Agreement. Amortization expense for the deferred financing cost associated with the Subordinated Loan Agreement was $99 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Associated with the Previous Credit Facility, the Company had capitalized and amortized deferred financing cost using the effective interest method. The Company had capitalized $2.7 million in deferred financing cost associated with the Previous Credit Facility. Amortization expense for the deferred financing cost associated with the third amendment and restatement of the Previous Credit Facility was $141 thousand and $665 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company wrote off $140 thousand of prior deferred financing cost and incurred $15 thousand in external legal fees during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as a result of the extinguishment of the Previous Credit Facility, which is included in interest expense.

The Company had a revolving credit facility on December 31, 2015 of $5.0 million associated with the Previous Credit Facility. There was no balance outstanding as of December 31, 2015. The facility was terminated on February 17, 2016. The Company paid a commitment fee of 0.50% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears, on the unused portion of the revolver loan under the Previous Credit Facility. The commitment fee expense was $3 thousand and $19 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The revolving credit facility associated with the Company’s Senior Loan Agreement had a maximum borrowing capacity of $5.0 million on September 30, 2016. The revolving credit facility is available until February 17, 2021. There was no balance outstanding as of September 30, 2016. The Company pays a monthly fee of 0.75% per annum on the unused portion of the revolver loan under the Senior Loan Agreement, payable in arrears. The fee expense was $24 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Maturities of notes payable for the next five years and thereafter, assuming no annual excess cash flow payments and the PIK interest, are as follows (in thousands):

2016 (remaining)	$	1,000
2017		4,000
2018		4,000
2019		4,000
2020		4,000
Thereafter		81,300
Total	$	98,300

In addition, PIK interest of $1,772 thousand associated with the Subordinated Loan Agreement will be paid at maturity. A total of $5,758 thousand of debt issuance cost is amortized over the life of the loans and is recorded net of the notes payable on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The Company’s notes payable agreements are subject to certain financial covenants and restrictions on indebtedness, financial guarantees, business combinations and other related items. As of September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants and restrictions.

XML

Note 3 - Income Tax

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block]

3. Income Tax

As of each of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of $0 and $25 thousand, respectively. The Company had no alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards as of September 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015.  The Company establishes valuation allowances when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.  As of September 30, 2016, the Company had no valuation allowance recorded. 

The effective income tax rate as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was 39.1% and 39.8%, respectively.

XML

Note 4 - Net Income Per Common Share

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Earnings Per Share [Text Block]

4. Net Income per Common Share

Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per common share reflects the potential dilution that would occur should all of the shares of Class A common stock underlying restricted stock units (“RSUs”), as well as all of the shares of Class A common stock, for which the Company has accrued an expense, that may be delivered pursuant to the purchase agreement relating to the assets of Reliable Networks of Maine, LLC (“Reliable Networks”), be issued.

A reconciliation of the common shares for purposes of the calculation of the Company’s basic and diluted net income per common share is as follows (weighted average number of common shares outstanding in whole numbers and net income in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic		3,283,177		3,239,306		3,283,177		3,239,306
Effect of dilutive securities		101,131		50,373		97,001		46,196
Weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares - diluted		3,384,308		3,289,679		3,380,178		3,285,502
Net income	$	1,125	$	1,850	$	4,199	$	5,640
Net income per common share - basic	$	0.34	$	0.57	$	1.28	$	1.74
Net income per common share - diluted	$	0.33	$	0.56	$	1.24	$	1.72

XML

Note 5 - Revenue Concentrations

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Concentration Risk Disclosure [Text Block]

5. Revenue Concentrations

Revenues for interstate access services are based on reimbursement of costs and an allowed rate of return. Revenues of this nature are received from the National Exchange Carrier Association in the form of monthly settlements. Such revenues amounted to 18.4% and 16.9% of the Company’s total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

XML

Note 6 - Commitments and Contingencies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]

6. Commitments and Contingencies

From time to time, the Company may be involved in various claims, legal actions and regulatory proceedings incidental to and in the ordinary course of business, including administrative hearings of the Alabama Public Service Commission, the Maine Public Utilities Commission, the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Cable, the Missouri Public Service Commission, the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission, the Vermont Public Service Board and the West Virginia Public Service Commission, relating primarily to rate making. In addition, the Company may be involved in similar proceedings with interconnection carriers and the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”). Currently, except as set forth below, none of the Company’s legal proceedings are expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.

Sprint Communications L.P. (“Sprint”), MCI Communications Services, Inc. (“MCI”) and Verizon Select Services, Inc. (“Verizon”) filed more than 60 lawsuits in federal courts across the United States alleging that over 400 local exchange carriers (“LECs” or “LEC Defendants”) overcharged Sprint, MCI and Verizon for so-called intraMTA traffic (wireless phone calls that originate and terminate in the same metropolitan transit area). The lawsuits seek a refund of previously-paid access charges for intraMTA traffic, as well as a discount related to intraMTA traffic on a going-forward basis. One of the Company’s subsidiaries, MMT, was named as a defendant in two of the lawsuits that are being brought before the District Court for the Western District of Missouri (one filed on May 2, 2014 by Sprint and the other filed on September 5, 2014 by MCI and Verizon). In addition, one of the Company’s other subsidiaries, OTP, was named as a defendant in a lawsuit relating to these issues filed by MCI and Verizon in the District Court for the District of Delaware on September 5, 2014. As all of the lawsuits relating to these issues raise the same fundamental questions of law, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has consolidated the lawsuits in the District Court for the Northern District of Texas (the “Court”) for all pre-trial proceedings. On November 17, 2015, the Court issued a memorandum opinion and order dismissing the federal-law claims with prejudice, dismissing the state-law claims but granting leave to re

-plead said claims, and denying the Defendants’ request to refer the matter to the FCC. The Court continues to handle pre-trial motions related to some LEC Defendants’ counterclaims, with decisions on those matters and final summary judgment motions not scheduled to occur until April of 2017. After all pre-trial matters are addressed, Sprint, MCI and Verizon have indicated they will appeal the Court’s November 17, 2015 decision making. Accordingly, it is not possible to determine at this time whether these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. 

On November 10, 2014, a large coalition of the LEC Defendants, including MMT and OTP, filed a petition for declaratory ruling with the FCC seeking a ruling by the FCC that: (1) any traffic intentionally routed over Interexchange carrier (“IXC”) trunks by IXCs should be subject to access charges; (2) only carriers with specific agreements with an LEC may use alternative billing arrangements; (3) federal tariffing rules require the LECs to assess access charges for switched access traffic routed through Feature Group D trunks; and (4) the IXCs may not engage in self-help by refusing to pay the LEC Defendants’ properly assessed access charges. On March 11, 2015, the LEC Defendants filed their reply brief with the FCC. No timeline has been established for a decision by the FCC and the FCC has given no indication that it intends to issue a ruling in the near future

. Accordingly, it is not possible to determine at this time whether this action will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.

XML

Note 7 - Stock Plans and Stock Associated with Acquisition

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Shareholders' Equity and Share-based Payments [Text Block]

7. Stock Plans and Stock Associated with Acquisition

During the

nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company granted RSUs underlying 119,655 shares of Class A common stock. The Company granted RSUs underlying 122,534 shares of Class A common stock on May 15, 2015. As of September 30, 2016, 212,213 RSUs remained outstanding. These RSUs (or a portion thereof) vest with respect to each recipient over a one to three year period from the date of grant, provided the recipient remains in the employment or service of the Company as of the vesting date and, in selected instances, certain performance criteria are attained. Additionally, these RSUs (or a portion thereof) could vest earlier in the event of a change in control of the Company, or upon involuntary termination without cause. These grants are made primarily to executive-level personnel at the Company and, as a result, no compensation costs have been capitalized.

The following table summarizes RSU activity as of September 30, 2016:

	RSUs			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2015		155,761		$	4.78
Granted		119,655		$	4.40
Vested		(56,728	)	$	4.80
Forfeited or cancelled		(6,475	)	$	4.71
Outstanding at September 30, 2016		212,213		$	4.56

CRC acquired substantially all of the assets of Reliable Networks on January 2, 2014. Pursuant to the purchase agreement relating to the Reliable Networks acquisition, Class A common stock was issued to the former owner of Reliable Networks in 2015 and will be issued to the former owner of Reliable Networks in 2017, contingent on Reliable Networks achieving certain financial objectives and certain other conditions being satisfied, including that certain individuals must be employed by the Company or any of its subsidiaries and in good standing on the last day of the applicable year (the “Earn-Out”). For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company delivered 68,233 shares of Class A common stock to the former owner of Reliable Networks on March 12, 2015 as a result of the Earn-Out. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the applicable Earn-Out criteria was not met and no shares of Class A common stock were issued as a result of the Earn-Out. No shares of Class A common stock were earned or issued as a result of the Earn-Out during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Stock-based compensation expense related to RSUs and the Earn-Out was $311 thousand and $283 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Accounting standards require that the Company estimate forfeitures for RSUs and the Earn-Out and reduce compensation expense accordingly. The Company has reduced its expense by the assumed forfeiture rate and will evaluate actual experience against the assumed forfeiture rate going forward. The forfeiture rate has been developed using historical performance metrics which could impact the number of the final issuance of Class A common stock.

As of September 30, 2016, the unrecognized total compensation cost related to unvested RSUs was $630 thousand. That cost is expected to be recognized by the end of 2019. 

XML

Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries, all of which are either directly or indirectly wholly owned. These include: Blountsville Telephone LLC; Brindlee Mountain Telephone LLC; CRC Communications LLC (“CRC”); Granby Telephone LLC; Hopper Telecommunications LLC; Mid-Maine Telecom LLC; Mid-Maine TelPlus LLC; Otelco Mid-Missouri LLC (“MMT”); and its wholly owned subsidiary I-Land Internet Services LLC; Otelco Telecommunications LLC; Otelco Telephone LLC (“OTP”); Pine Tree Telephone LLC; Saco River Telephone LLC; Shoreham Telephone LLC; and War Telephone LLC.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of the aforesaid subsidiaries after elimination of all material intercompany balances and transactions. The unaudited operating results for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016 or any other period.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. The interim condensed consolidated financial information herein is unaudited. The information reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods included in this report.

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

During 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) has issued Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”) 2016-01 through 2016-15. Except for ASU 2016-02, 2016-08, 2016-09, 2016-10, 2016-12 and 2016-15 which are discussed below, these ASUs provide technical corrections or simplification to existing guidance and to specialized industries or entities and therefore have minimal, if any, impact on the Company.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,

Leases (Topic 842).

This ASU requires lessees to recognize most leases on the balance sheet. The provisions of this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the requirements of this ASU and has not yet determined the impact of the adoption on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09

, Compensation–Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

. The objective of this ASU is to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for any entity in any interim or annual period. The Company adopted this ASU as of March 31, 2016 and that adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)

. This ASU requires that an entity recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU also provides a more robust framework for revenue issues and improves comparability of revenue recognition practices across industries. This ASU was the product of a joint project between the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard. This guidance was to be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption not permitted. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14,

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date.

This ASU confirmed a one-year delay in the effective date of ASU 2014-09, making the effective date for the Company the first quarter of fiscal 2018 instead of the first quarter of fiscal 2017. 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08,

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Consideration (Reporting Revenues Gross versus Net)

. This ASU is further guidance to ASU 2014-09, and clarifies principal versus agent considerations. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10,

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing.

This ASU is also further guidance to ASU 2014-09, and clarifies the identification of performance obligations. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12,

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients.

This ASU is also further guidance to ASU 2014-09, and clarifies assessing the narrow aspects of recognizing revenue. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of ASUs 2014-09, 2016-08, 2016-10 and 2016-12 on its condensed consolidated financial statements and has not yet determined the method by which the Company will adopt ASU 2014-09.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15

,

Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230

):

Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments

. This ASU addresses how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows, and other Topics. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The implementation of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities or Restructurings, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Refinancing

On January 25, 2016, the Company entered into a senior loan agreement (the “Senior Loan Agreement”), providing for a five year term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $85.0 million and a five year $5.0 million revolving credit facility, and a subordinated loan agreement (the “Subordinated Loan Agreement”), providing for a five and a half year term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $15.0 million. On February 17, 2016, the Subordinated Loan Agreement was amended to increase the aggregate principal amount available for borrowing thereunder to $15.3 million, and the Company borrowed $85.0 million under the term loan facility of the Senior Loan Agreement and $15.3 million under the Subordinated Loan Agreement. The Company used the borrowings under the Senior Loan Agreement and the Subordinated Loan Agreement to, among other things, pay all amounts due, including principal, interest and fees, and satisfy in full all of its obligations under its previous credit facility (the “Previous Credit Facility”), which was scheduled to mature on April 30, 2016. As a result of the repayment of the Previous Credit Facility, all of the shares of the Company’s Class B common stock were automatically converted into an equal number of shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. The term loan facility under the Senior Loan Agreement requires principal payments of $1.0 million quarterly, beginning on April 1, 2016. Principal amounts outstanding under the Subordinated Loan Agreement will generally not be due until maturity. The Company recorded costs of $15 thousand and write-off of loan costs of $140 thousand in connection with this refinancing.

Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Reclassifications

Certain items in the prior year’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to 2016 presentation. In addition, the Company has corrected a typographical mistake in the Company’s audited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015. Specifically, current liabilities as shown in its audited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 was presented as $1,181 thousand but should have been $1,818 thousand, or an increase of $637 thousand. The typographical mistake did not affect the total current liabilities as of December 31, 2015, as set forth in the audited consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015. Based on its evaluation, the Company concluded that it is not probable that the analysis of a reasonable person relying on the financial statements would have been changed or influenced by the mistake or its correction.

XML

Note 2 - Notes Payable (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Senior Notes [Member]

Notes Tables

Schedule of Long-term Debt Instruments [Table Text Block]

							September 30,			December 31,
	Current			Long-term			2016			2015
Senior Loan Agreement with Cerberus Business Finance, LLC; variable interest rate of 8.75% at September 30, 2016, interest is monthly, paid in arrears on the first business day of each month. The Senior Loan Agreement is secured by the total assets of the subsidiary guarantors. The unpaid balance is due February 17, 2021.	$	4,000		$	79,000		$	83,000		$	—
Debt issuance cost		(1,071	)		(3,092	)		(4,163	)		—
Senior notes payable, net of debt issuance cost	$	2,929		$	75,908		$	78,837		$	—

Schedule of Long-term Debt Instruments [Table Text Block]

	September 30,		December 31,
	2016		2015
Third amended and restated term credit facility; Antares Capital (formerly General Electric Capital Corporation); variable interest rate of 6.50% at December 31, 2015. The Previous Credit Facility was secured by the total assets of the subsidiary guarantors. The Previous Credit Facility was fully repaid on February 17, 2016.	$	—	$	99,255
Less: Current portion of long-term debt, net of debt issuance cost of $0 and $797, respectively		—		(2,203	)
Long-term notes payable less current maturities (net)	$	—	$	97,052

	September 30,			December 31,
	2016			2015
Subordinated Loan Agreement with NewSpring Mezzanine Capital III, L.P.; fixed interest rate due monthly of 12.0 0% at September 30, 2016. Payment in Kind (“PIK”) interest rate of 2.00% per annum. PIK interest accrued is added to the principal amount then outstanding on the last business day of each quarter. The unpaid balance is due August 17, 2021.	$	15,300		$	—
PIK interest added to principal		194			—
Less: Long-term portion of debt issuance cost		(793	)		—
Long-term notes payable, net of debt issuance cost	$	14,701		$	—

Schedule of Maturities of Long-term Debt [Table Text Block]

2016 (remaining)	$	1,000
2017		4,000
2018		4,000
2019		4,000
2020		4,000
Thereafter		81,300
Total	$	98,300

XML

Note 4 - Net Income Per Common Share (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Notes Tables

Schedule of Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted [Table Text Block]

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic		3,283,177		3,239,306		3,283,177		3,239,306
Effect of dilutive securities		101,131		50,373		97,001		46,196
Weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares - diluted		3,384,308		3,289,679		3,380,178		3,285,502
Net income	$	1,125	$	1,850	$	4,199	$	5,640
Net income per common share - basic	$	0.34	$	0.57	$	1.28	$	1.74
Net income per common share - diluted	$	0.33	$	0.56	$	1.24	$	1.72

XML

Note 7 - Stock Plans and Stock Associated with Acquisition (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Notes Tables

Schedule of Share-based Compensation, Restricted Stock Units Award Activity [Table Text Block]

	RSUs			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2015		155,761		$	4.78
Granted		119,655		$	4.40
Vested		(56,728	)	$	4.80
Forfeited or cancelled		(6,475	)	$	4.71
Outstanding at September 30, 2016		212,213		$	4.56

XML

Note 1 - Organization and Basis of Financial Reporting (Details Textual) - USD ($)		8 Months Ended	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jan. 25, 2016	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Feb. 17, 2016
Senior Notes [Member]
Debt Instrument, Term	5 years
Debt Instrument, Face Amount	$ 85,000,000
Proceeds from Issuance of Debt		$ 85,000,000
Debt Instrument, Periodic Payment			$ 1,000,000
Subordinated Debt [Member]
Debt Instrument, Term	5 years 182 days
Debt Instrument, Face Amount	$ 15,000,000				$ 15,300,000
Proceeds from Issuance of Debt		15,300,000
Revolving Credit Facility [Member]
Debt Instrument, Term	5 years
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity	$ 5,000,000	5,000,000	5,000,000
Error Correction from Typographical Mistake [Member] | Scenario, Previously Reported [Member]
Liabilities, Current				$ 1,181,000
Error Correction from Typographical Mistake [Member] | Restatement Adjustment [Member]
Increase (Decrease) in Operating Liabilities				637,000
Error Correction from Typographical Mistake [Member]
Liabilities, Current				1,818,000
Debt Issuance Costs, Net		15,000	15,000
Write off of Deferred Debt Issuance Cost			140,000
Liabilities, Current		$ 11,417,000	$ 11,417,000	$ 10,074,000

XML

Note 2 - Notes Payable (Details Textual) - USD ($)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Jan. 25, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Previous Credit Facility [Member]
Long-term Line of Credit				$ 0
Debt Issuance Costs, Gross	$ 2,700,000
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs	141,000	$ 665,000
Write off of Deferred Debt Issuance Cost	140,000
Legal Fees	$ 15,000
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity				$ 5,000,000
Line of Credit Facility, Commitment Fee Percentage	0.50%
Line of Credit Facility, Commitment Fee Amount	$ 3,000	19,000
Revolving Credit Facility [Member]
Long-term Line of Credit	0
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity	$ 5,000,000		$ 5,000,000
Line of Credit Facility, Commitment Fee Percentage	0.75%
Line of Credit Facility, Commitment Fee Amount	$ 24,000
Senior Notes [Member]
Debt Issuance Costs, Gross	4,900,000
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs	704,000
Subordinated Debt [Member]
Debt Issuance Costs, Gross	892,000
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs	99,000
Accrued Paid-in-Kind Interest, Payment at Maturity	1,772,000
Notes Payable, Net [Member]
Debt Issuance Costs, Gross	5,758,000
Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs	929,000	$ 665,000
Write off of Deferred Debt Issuance Cost	$ 140,000

XML

Note 2 - Notes Payable - Summary of Notes Payable (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2015
Subordinated Debt [Member]
Long-term debt	$ 15,300
Payment in kind interest - subordinated debt	194
Less: Long-term portion of debt issuance cost	(793)
Long-term notes payable, net of debt issuance cost	14,701
Previous Credit Facility [Member]
Long-term debt			99,255
Less: Current portion of long-term debt, net of debt issuance cost of $0 and $797, respectively			(2,203)
Long-term notes payable less current maturities (net)			97,052
Long-term debt	98,300
Less: Current portion of long-term debt, net of debt issuance cost of $0 and $797, respectively	(2,929)		(2,203)
Long-term notes payable less current maturities (net)	90,609		$ 97,052
Payment in kind interest - subordinated debt	$ 194

XML

Note 2 - Notes Payable - Summary of Notes Payable (Details) (Parentheticals) - USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Previous Credit Facility [Member]
Interest rate	6.50%	6.50%
Issuance costs, net	$ 0	$ 797,000
Fixed interest rate	12.00%	2.00%

XML

Note 2 - Notes Payable - Senior Loan Agreement (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Senior Notes [Member]
Senior note payable, current	$ 4,000
Senior note payable, long-term	79,000
Senior note payable, face amount	83,000
Debt issuance cost	(1,071)
Senior notes payable, net of debt issuance cost	2,929
Long-term notes payable less current maturities (net)	75,908
Senior notes payable, net of debt issuance cost	78,837
Senior notes payable, net of debt issuance cost	2,929	2,203
Long-term notes payable less current maturities (net)	$ 90,609	$ 97,052

XML

Note 2 - Notes Payable - Maturities of Notes Payable (Details) $ in Millions	Sep. 30, 2016 USD ($)
2016 (remaining)	$ 1.0
2017	4.0
2018	4.0
2019	4.0
2020	4.0
Thereafter	81.3
Total	$ 98.3

XML

Note 3 - Income Tax (Details Textual) - USD ($)	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Domestic Tax Authority [Member]
Operating Loss Carryforwards	$ 0	$ 25,000
Deferred Tax Assets, Tax Credit Carryforwards, Alternative Minimum Tax	0	$ 0
Deferred Tax Assets, Valuation Allowance	$ 0
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation, Percent	39.10%	39.80%

XML

Note 4 - Net Income Per Common Share - Reconciliation of Income (Loss) Per Common Share (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic (in shares)	3,283,177	3,239,306	3,283,177	3,239,306
Effect of dilutive securities (in shares)	101,131	50,373	97,001	46,196
Weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares - diluted (in shares)	3,384,308	3,289,679	3,380,178	3,285,502
Net income	$ 1,125	$ 1,850	$ 4,199	$ 5,640
Net income per common share - basic (in dollars per share)	$ 0.34	$ 0.57	$ 1.28	$ 1.74
Net income per common share - diluted (in dollars per share)	$ 0.33	$ 0.56	$ 1.24	$ 1.72

XML

Note 5 - Revenue Concentrations (Details Textual)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015
National Exchange Carrier Association [Member] | Customer Concentration Risk [Member] | Sales Revenue, Net [Member]
Concentration Risk, Percentage	18.40%	16.90%

XML

Note 7 - Stock Plans and Stock Associated with Acquisition (Details Textual) - USD ($)		9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	May 15, 2015	Sep. 30, 2016	Sep. 30, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Reliable Networks [Member] | Common Class A [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Equity Instruments Other than Options, Grants in Period		0
Business Acquisition, Equity Interest Issued or Issuable, Number of Shares		0		68,233
Common Class A [Member] | Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Equity Instruments Other than Options, Grants in Period		119,655
Allocated Share-based Compensation Expense	$ 122,534
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Award Vesting Period		1 year
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Award Vesting Period		3 years
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Equity Instruments Other than Options, Grants in Period		119,655
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs, Capitalized Amount		$ 0
Allocated Share-based Compensation Expense		$ 311,000	$ 283,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Non-Option Equity Instruments, Outstanding, Number		212,213
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Nonvested Awards, Compensation Cost Not yet Recognized		$ 630

XML

Note 7 - Stock Plans and Stock Associated with Acquisition - Summary of RSU Activity (Details) - Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) [Member]	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2016 $ / shares shares
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 (in shares) | shares	155,761
Outstanding at December 31, 2015 (in dollars per share) | $ / shares	$ 4.78
Granted (in shares) | shares	119,655
Granted (in dollars per share) | $ / shares	$ 4.40
Vested (in shares) | shares	(56,728)
Vested (in dollars per share) | $ / shares	$ 4.80
Forfeited or cancelled (in shares) | shares	(6,475)
Forfeited or cancelled (in dollars per share) | $ / shares	$ 4.71
Outstanding at September 30, 2016 (in shares) | shares	212,213
Outstanding at September 30, 2016 (in dollars per share) | $ / shares	$ 4.56