UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
	Or
¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from                               to

Commission File Number: 1-32362

OTELCO INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	52-2126395
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
organization)
505 Third Avenue East, Oneonta, Alabama	35121
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

(205) 625-3574

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  ý No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes  ¨ No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer ý Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes  ¨ No  ý

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at May 7, 2010
Class A Common Stock ($0.01 par value per share)	12,676,733
Class B Common Stock ($0.01 par value per share)	544,671

OTELCO INC.

FORM 10-Q

For the three month period ended March 31, 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I  FINANCIAL INFORMATION		2
Item 1.	Financial Statements	2
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010	2
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2010	3
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2010	4
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	13
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	20
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	20
PART II  OTHER INFORMATION		21
Item 6.	Exhibits	21

i

Unless the context otherwise requires, the words “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company” and “Otelco” refer to Otelco Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries as of March 31, 2010.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties.  Forward-looking statements give our current expectations relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business.  These statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the timing or nature of future operating or financial performance or other events.  These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that we have made in light of our experience in the industry in which we operate, as well as our perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances.  Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, you should be aware that many factors could affect our actual financial condition or results of operations and cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements.

1

PART I  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements

OTELCO INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31,			March 31,
	2009			2010
Assets				(unaudited)
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	17,731,044		$	21,204,781
Accounts receivable:
Due from subscribers, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $473,572 and $411,964, respectively		4,650,909			4,307,278
Unbilled receivables		2,444,979			2,438,340
Other		3,200,945			3,137,048
Materials and supplies		1,969,966			2,056,125
Prepaid expenses		1,342,249			1,368,752
Income tax receivable		389,486			-
Deferred income taxes		744,531			744,531
Total current assets		32,474,109			35,256,855
Property and equipment, net		69,028,973			66,826,868
Goodwill		188,190,078			188,190,078
Intangible assets, net		34,218,115			32,096,989
Investments		1,991,158			1,984,781
Deferred financing costs		6,964,015			6,626,038
Deferred income taxes		4,482,430			4,482,430
Other assets		179,325			149,472
Total assets	$	337,528,203		$	335,613,511
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	3,145,728		$	3,205,704
Accrued expenses		6,167,023			5,919,142
Advance billings and payments		1,665,422			1,694,474
Deferred income taxes		394,850			394,850
Customer deposits		172,109			182,719
Total current liabilities		11,545,132			11,396,889
Deferred income taxes		42,239,262			42,239,262
Interest rate swaps		1,592,813			2,478,983
Advance billings and payments		698,352			688,006
Other liabilities		165,968			165,709
Long-term notes payable		273,717,301			273,695,215
Total liabilities		329,958,828			330,664,064
Class B common convertible to senior subordinated notes		4,085,033			4,085,033
Stockholders’ Equity
Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value-authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 12,676,733 shares		126,767			126,767
Class B Common Stock, $.01 par value-authorized 800,000 shares; issued and outstanding 544,671 shares		5,447			5,447
Additional paid in capital		10,340,862			8,106,588
Retained deficit		(6,988,734	)		(7,374,388	)
Total stockholders’ equity		3,484,342			864,414
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	337,528,203		$	335,613,511

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2

OTELCO INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

	Three months ended March 31,
	2009			2010
Revenues
Local services	$	11,854,980		$	12,238,674
Network access		8,094,133			7,984,968
Cable television		606,687			665,835
Internet		3,541,677			3,511,106
Transport services		1,402,699			1,393,626
Total revenues		25,500,176			25,794,209
Operating expenses
Cost of services and products		10,666,456			10,610,193
Selling, general and administrative expenses		3,576,674			3,230,996
Depreciation and amortization		6,791,839			6,084,291
Total operating expenses		21,034,969			19,925,480
Income from operations		4,465,207			5,868,729
Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(6,598,953	)		(5,988,642	)
Change in fair value of derivatives		(951,103	)		(886,170	)
Other income		225,860			358,832
Total other expenses		(7,324,196	)		(6,515,980	)
Loss before income tax		(2,858,989	)		(647,251	)
Income tax benefit		1,024,953			261,595
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(1,834,036	)	$	(385,656	)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		12,676,733			12,676,733
Diluted		13,221,404			13,221,404
Basic net loss per share		(0.14	)		(0.03	)
Diluted net loss per share		(0.14	)		(0.03	)
Dividends declared per share		0.18			0.18

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

OTELCO INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

	Three months ended March 31,
	2009			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(1,834,036	)	$	(385,656	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation		3,680,873			3,572,918
Amortization		3,110,966			2,511,373
Interest rate caplet		344,082			-
Amortization of debt premium		(19,671	)		(22,086	)
Amortization of loan costs		337,976			337,976
Change in fair value of derivatives		951,103			886,170
Provision for uncollectible revenue		58,691			77,045
Changes in assets and liabilities; net of assets and liabilities acquired:
Accounts receivables		129,927			365,460
Materials and supplies		(7,465	)		(86,159	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		210,917			(26,503	)
Income tax receivable		-			389,486
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(589,196	)		(187,900	)
Advance billings and payments		(13,595	)		18,706
Other liabilities		(14,921	)		10,351
Net cash from operating activities		6,345,651			7,461,181
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition and construction of property and equipment		(1,228,751	)		(1,753,170	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,228,751	)		(1,753,170	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Cash dividends paid		(2,234,274	)		(2,234,274	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(2,234,274	)		(2,234,274	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		2,882,626			3,473,737
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		13,542,255			17,731,044
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	16,424,881		$	21,204,781
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	6,215,276		$	5,569,134
Income taxes received	$	(61,342	)	$	(326,486	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1.	Organization and Basis of Financial Reporting
	Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
	The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. These include:  Otelco Telecommunications LLC (“OTC”); Otelco Telephone LLC (“OTP”); Hopper Telecommunications Company, Inc. (“HTC”); Brindlee Mountain Telephone Company (“BMTC”); Blountsville Telephone Company, Inc. (“BTC”); Mid-Missouri Holding Corporation (“MMH”) and its wholly owned subsidiary Mid-Missouri Telephone Company (“MMT”) and its wholly owned subsidiary Imagination, Inc.; Mid-Maine Telecom, Inc. (“MMTI”); Mid-Maine TelPlus (“MMTP”); The Granby Telephone & Telegraph Co. of Massachusetts (“GTT”); War Acquisition Corporation (“WT”); The Pine Tree Telephone and Telegraph Company (“PTT”); Saco River Telegraph and Telephone Company (“SRT”); CRC Communications of Maine, Inc. (“PTN”); and Communications Design Acquisition Corporation (“CDAC”).
	The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of the aforesaid subsidiaries after elimination of all material intercompany balances and transactions.  The unaudited operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.
	The consolidated financial statements and notes included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.  The interim consolidated financial information herein is unaudited.  The information reflects all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods included in the report.
	Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year’s presentation.
	Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
	In February 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-09, Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2010-09”), an update to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 855, Subsequent Events.  ASU 2010-09 removes the requirement for a Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements.  Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  The FASB also clarified that if the financial statements have been revised, then an entity that is not an SEC filer should disclose both the date that the financial statements were issued or available to be issued.  The FASB believes these amendments remove potential conflicts with the SEC’s literature.  ASU 2010-09 is effective upon issuance except for the use of the issued date for conduit debt obligors, which is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2010.  The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
	Recent Accounting Pronouncements
	In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements – a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (“ASU 2009-13”), an update to ASC 605, Revenue Recognition.  ASU 2009-13 provides application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables should be separated, and how the consideration should be allocated to one or more units of accounting.  ASU 2009-13 establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable.  The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence, if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific nor third-party evidence is available.  The Company will be required to apply this guidance prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified for the fiscal year beginning on or after June 15, 2010; however earlier application is permitted.  The Company has not determined the impact that this update may have on its consolidated financial statements.

5

	In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”), an update to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”).  ASU 2010-06 provides more robust disclosures about (1) the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and inputs used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and (4) the transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3.  The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements.  Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company has not determined the impact that this update may have on its consolidated financial statements.
	Accounting for Income Taxes
	The Company accounts for income taxes for interim periods in accordance with the ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). The Income Taxes—Interim Reporting subtopic of ASC 740 requires the tax (or benefit) related to ordinary income (or loss) to be computed based on the estimated annual effective tax rate expense.  In computing the estimated annual tax rate, anticipated tax credits are limited to the amounts that are expected to be realized or are expected to be recognizable at the end of the current fiscal year.  If the loss realized in a quarter is greater than the estimated loss for the year, the tax benefit recognized is limited to the annual benefit anticipated.  As such, the tax benefit recognized this quarter is subject to this limitation.
2.	Commitments and Contingencies
	From time to time, we may be involved in various claims, legal actions and regulatory proceedings incidental to and in the ordinary course of business, including administrative hearings of the Alabama, Maine, Missouri, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and West Virginia Public Service Commissions relating primarily to rate making.  Currently, none of the legal proceedings are expected to have a material adverse effect on our business.
3.	Derivative and Hedge Activities
	An interest rate cap was purchased on December 21, 2004, coincident with the closing of our initial public offering and the recapitalization of our senior notes payable. The interest rate cap was purchased to mitigate the risk of rising interest rates to limit or cap the rate at 3% for the three month LIBOR index plus the applicable margin on $80 million in senior debt for five years. On July 5, 2007, the Company repaid $55,353,032 in debt, reducing its senior debt below the level of the rate cap. The cap was considered an effective hedge for the remaining senior debt as all critical terms of the interest rate cap are identical to the underlying debt it hedges. The balance of the cap at that time was considered as an investment and adjustments were made to accumulated other comprehensive income to reflect this change. On October 31, 2008, the Company entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement, increasing senior debt to $173.5 million in conjunction with the acquisition of three entities from Country Road Communications LLC. The full $80 million rate cap is accounted for as an effective hedge from that date through the end of the rate cap on December 20, 2009.
	The cost of the effective portion of the interest rate cap was expensed as interest over the effective life of the hedge in accordance with the quarterly value of the caplets as determined at the date of inception.
	The second amended and restated credit agreement requires that the Company acquire interest rate protection for at least half of the $173.5 million senior debt through at least October 31, 2010. Accordingly, the Company has acquired two interest rate swaps with approved counterparties.  The first swap has a notional amount of $90 million with the Company paying a fixed rate of 1.85% and the counterparty paying a variable rate based upon the three month LIBOR interest rate. It is effective from February 9, 2009 through February 8, 2012. The second swap has a notional amount of $60 million with the Company paying a fixed rate of 2.0475% and the counterparty paying a variable rate based upon the three month LIBOR interest rate. It is effective from February 9, 2010 through February 8, 2012. From an accounting perspective, the documentation for both swaps does not meet the technical requirements of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, to allow the swaps to be considered highly effective hedging instruments and therefore the swaps do not qualify for hedge accounting.  The change in fair value of the swaps is charged or credited to income as a change in fair value of derivatives.  Over the life of the swaps, the cumulative change in value will be zero.
4.	Income (Loss) per Common Share and Potential Common Share
	Basic income per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted income (loss) per common share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if the shares of Class B common stock are exchanged for Income Deposit Securities (“IDS”) units.  Class B common stock is exchangeable for IDS units on a one-for-one basis, each of which includes a Class A common share.  The Company currently expects to offer the holders of Class B common stock the opportunity to exchange their Class B shares for IDS units during second quarter 2010.

6

A reconciliation of the common shares for the Company’s basic and diluted loss per common share calculation is as follows:

	For the three months ended March 31,
	2009			2010
Weighted average common shares-basic		12,676,733			12,676,733
Effect of dilutive securities		544,671			544,671
Weighted-average common shares and potential
common shares-diluted		13,221,404			13,221,404
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(1,834,036	)	$	(385,656	)
Net loss per basic share	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.03	)
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(1,834,036	)	$	(385,656	)
Less: Change in fair value of B share derivative		(11,580	)		-
Net loss available for diluted shares	$	(1,845,616	)	$	(385,656	)
Net loss per diluted share	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.03	)

5.	Fair Value Measurements
	In accordance with ASC 820, the following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2010:

	March 31, 2010
	Fair Value		Level 1 (1)		Level 2 (2)		Level 3 (3)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	21,204,781	$	21,204,781	$	-	$	-
Co-operative patronage shares		1,542,495		-		-		1,542,495
Total assets	$	22,747,276	$	21,204,781	$	-	$	1,542,495
Liabilities
Interest rate swaps	$	2,478,983	$	-	$	2,478,983	$	-
Total liabilities	$	2,478,983	$	-	$	2,478,983	$	-

___________________

(1)	Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
(2)	Significant other observable inputs.
(3)	Significant unobservable inputs.

7

	The Company retains its cash and cash equivalents in short-term interest bearing instruments whose value is observable on a daily basis. Patronage shares have been issued primarily by one of our lenders which operates as a co-operative.  The Company does not pay for these shares but receives them as a non-cash dividend. The market for these shares is limited to the issuing organization and subject to uncertainty of future redemption for cash. These shares are valued at approximately 55% of their originally issued value. While the issuer and the Company expect these shares to be worth their issued value, the current valuation recognizes some uncertainty of their future redemption value.
	The interest rate swaps are valued at the end of the quarter by market experts in that business based on similar transactions and rates in an active financial market.
6.	Subsidiary Guarantees
	The Company has no independent assets or operations separate from its operating subsidiaries.  The guarantees of its senior subordinated notes by 12 of its 14 operating subsidiaries are full and unconditional, joint and several.  The operating subsidiaries have no independent long-term notes payable.  There are no significant restrictions on the ability of the Company to obtain funds from its operating subsidiaries by dividend or loan.  The condensed consolidated financial information is provided for the guarantor entities.
	The following tables present condensed consolidating balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010; condensed consolidating statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2010; and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2010.

8

Otelco Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

December 31, 2009

	Parent		Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	-	$	17,617,266		$	113,778		$	-		$	17,731,044
Accounts receivable, net		-		9,354,246			942,587			-			10,296,833
Materials and supplies		-		938,766			1,031,200			-			1,969,966
Prepaid expenses		76,219		1,192,272			73,758			-			1,342,249
Income tax receivables		389,486		-			-			-			389,486
Deferred income taxes		744,531		-			-			-			744,531
Investment in subsidiaries		113,558,790		-			-			(113,558,790	)		-
Intercompany receivable		129,450,605		-			-			(129,450,605	)		-
Total current assets		244,219,631		29,102,550			2,161,323			(243,009,395	)		32,474,109
Property and equipment, net		-		57,762,888			11,266,085			-			69,028,973
Goodwill		-		190,126,718			(1,936,640	)		-			188,190,078
Intangible assets, net		-		31,361,923			2,856,192			-			34,218,115
Investments		1,000		1,661,027			329,131			-			1,991,158
Deferred income taxes		4,482,430		-			-			-			4,482,430
Other long-term assets		7,519,753		(376,413	)		-			-			7,143,340
Total assets	$	256,222,814	$	309,638,693		$	14,676,091		$	(243,009,395	)	$	337,528,203
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	2,549,577	$	5,650,086		$	1,113,088		$	-		$	9,312,751
Intercompany payables		-		123,837,610			5,612,995			(129,450,605	)		-
Other current liabilities		394,850		1,758,112			79,419			-			2,232,381
Total current liabilities		2,944,427		131,245,808			6,805,502			(129,450,605	)		11,545,132
Deferred income taxes		10,662,374		28,184,570			3,392,318			-			42,239,262
Other liabilities		1,592,813		864,320			-			-			2,457,133
Long-term notes payable		233,453,825		40,263,476			-			-			273,717,301
Class B common convertible to senior subordinated notes		4,085,033		-			-			-			4,085,033
Stockholders’ equity		3,484,342		109,080,519			4,478,271			(113,558,790	)		3,484,342
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	256,222,814	$	309,638,693		$	14,676,091		$	(243,009,395	)	$	337,528,203

9

Otelco Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

March 31, 2010

	Parent			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	-		$	21,082,626		$	122,155		$	-		$	21,204,781
Accounts receivable, net		-			9,012,567			870,099			-			9,882,666
Materials and supplies		-			1,038,294			1,017,831			-			2,056,125
Prepaid expenses		364,954			946,899			56,899			-			1,368,752
Income tax receivables		-			-			-			-			-
Deferred income taxes		744,531			-			-			-			744,531
Investment in subsidiaries		119,348,571			-			-			(119,348,571	)		-
Intercompany receivable		(110,216,233	)		-			-			110,216,233			-
Total current assets		10,241,823			32,080,386			2,066,984			(9,132,338	)		35,256,855
Property and equipment, net		-			56,292,772			10,534,096			-			66,826,868
Goodwill		239,970,317			(49,843,599	)		(1,936,640	)		-			188,190,078
Intangible assets, net		-			29,302,888			2,794,101			-			32,096,989
Investments		1,203,605			452,045			329,131			-			1,984,781
Deferred income taxes		4,482,430			-			-			-			4,482,430
Other long-term assets		6,626,038			149,472			-			-			6,775,510
Total assets	$	262,524,213		$	68,433,964		$	13,787,672		$	(9,132,338	)	$	335,613,511
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	1,460,294		$	6,167,143		$	1,497,409		$	-		$	9,124,846
Intercompany payables		-			(114,053,638	)		3,837,405			110,216,233			-
Other current liabilities		394,850			1,796,243			80,950			-			2,272,043
Total current liabilities		1,855,144			(106,090,252	)		5,415,764			110,216,233			11,396,889
Deferred income taxes		19,808,900			19,038,044			3,392,318			-			42,239,262
Other liabilities		2,478,983			853,715			-			-			3,332,698
Long-term notes payable		233,431,739			40,263,476			-			-			273,695,215
Class B common convertible to senior subordinated notes		4,085,033			-			-			-			4,085,033
Stockholders’ equity		864,414			114,368,981			4,979,590			(119,348,571	)		864,414
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	262,524,213		$	68,433,964		$	13,787,672		$	(9,132,338	)	$	335,613,511

10

Otelco Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009

				Guarantor			Non-Guarantor
	Parent			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenue	$	834,291		$	24,517,361		$	2,944,759		$	(2,796,235	)	$	25,500,176
Operating expenses		(834,291	)		(20,807,675	)		(2,189,238	)		2,796,235			(21,034,969	)
Income from operations		-			3,709,686			755,521			-			4,465,207
Other income (expense)		(7,203,080	)		(122,608	)		1,492			-			(7,324,196	)
Earnings from subsidiaries		4,344,091			-			-			(4,344,091	)		-
Income (loss) before income tax		(2,858,989	)		3,587,078			757,013			(4,344,091	)		(2,858,989	)
Income tax benefit		1,024,953			-			-			-			1,024,953
Net income (loss) to common stockholders	$	(1,834,036	)	$	3,587,078		$	757,013		$	(4,344,091	)	$	(1,834,036	)

Otelco Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010

				Guarantor			Non-Guarantor
	Parent			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenue	$	819,513		$	25,003,395		$	2,796,336		$	(2,825,035	)	$	25,794,209
Operating expenses		(819,513	)		(19,636,002	)		(2,295,000	)		2,825,035			(19,925,480	)
Income from operations		-			5,367,393			501,336			-			5,868,729
Other expense		(6,437,032	)		(78,932	)		(16	)		-			(6,515,980	)
Earnings from subsidiaries		5,789,781			-			-			(5,789,781	)		-
Income (loss) before income tax		(647,251	)		5,288,461			501,320			(5,789,781	)		(647,251	)
Income tax benefit		261,595			-			-			-			261,595
Net income (loss) to common stockholders	$	(385,656	)	$	5,288,461		$	501,320		$	(5,789,781	)	$	(385,656	)

Otelco Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009

				Guarantor			Non-Guarantor
	Parent			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(1,834,036	)	$	3,587,078		$	757,013		$	(4,344,091	)	$	(1,834,036	)
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss)
to cash flows from operating activities		1,613,491			5,961,077			889,452			-			8,464,020
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of
assets and liabilities acquired		6,798,910			(5,576,966	)		(1,506,277	)		-			(284,333	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		6,578,365			3,971,189			140,188			(4,344,091	)		6,345,651
Cash flows used in investing activities		-			(1,089,328	)		(139,423	)		-			(1,228,751	)
Cash flows used in financing activities		(6,578,365	)		-			-			4,344,091			(2,234,274	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		-			2,881,861			765			-			2,882,626
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		-			13,521,138			21,117			-			13,542,255
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	-		$	16,402,999		$	21,882		$	-		$	16,424,881

11

Otelco Inc.

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010

				Guarantor			Non-Guarantor
	Parent			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(385,656	)	$	5,288,461		$	501,320		$	(5,789,781	)	$	(385,656	)
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss)
to cash flows from operating activities		1,202,061			5,218,268			943,067			-			7,363,396
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of
assets and liabilities acquired		7,207,650			(5,422,314	)		(1,301,895	)		-			483,441
Net cash provided by operating activities		8,024,055			5,084,415			142,492			(5,789,781	)		7,461,181
Cash flows used in investing activities		-			(1,619,055	)		(134,115	)		-			(1,753,170	)
Cash flows used in financing activities		(8,024,055	)		-			-			5,789,781			(2,234,274	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		-			3,465,360			8,377			-			3,473,737
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		-			17,617,266			113,778			-			17,731,044
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	-		$	21,082,626		$	122,155		$	-		$	21,204,781

7.	Revenue Concentrations
	Revenues for interstate access services are based on reimbursement of costs and an allowed rate of return.  Revenues of this nature are received from the National Exchange Carrier Association in the form of monthly settlements.  Such revenues amounted to 11.0%, and 10.4% of the Company’s total revenues from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
	The Company has a contract through 2012 with Time Warner Cable (“TW”) for the provision of wholesale network connections to TW’s customers in Maine and New Hampshire. TW represented approximately 9.9% and 10.3% of the Company’s consolidated revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively.  Other unrelated telecommunications providers also pay the Company access revenue for terminating calls through it to TW’s customers.

12

Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

General

Since 1999, we have acquired and operate ten rural local exchange carriers (“RLECs”) serving subscribers in north central Alabama, central Maine, western Massachusetts, central Missouri and southern West Virginia. We are the sole wireline telephone services provider for many of the rural communities we serve. We also operate competitive local exchange carriers (“CLECs”) serving subscribers throughout the state of Maine and New Hampshire.    Our services include local and long distance telephone services, network access, other telephone related services, cable television (in some markets) and Internet access. We view, manage and evaluate the results of operations from the various telecommunications services as one company and therefore have identified one reporting segment as it relates to providing segment information. As of March 31, 2010, we operated approximately 100,522 access line equivalents and supply an additional 137,318 wholesale network connections.

Our core businesses are local and long distance telecommunications services, wholesale access to the local and long distance network, and the provision of network access to other wireline, long distance and wireless carriers for calls originated or terminated on our network. Our core businesses generated approximately 78.4% of our total revenues in the first quarter of 2010. We also provide cable and satellite television service in some markets and digital high-speed data lines and dial-up Internet access in all of our markets.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes included in Item 1 of Part I and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this report.  The following discussion and analysis addresses our financial condition and results of operations on a consolidated basis.

Revenue Sources

We derive our revenues from five sources:

● Local services.  We receive revenues from providing local exchange telecommunications services in our ten rural territories, from the wholesale network services in New England, and on a competitive basis throughout Maine and New Hampshire. These revenues include monthly subscription charges for basic service, calling beyond the local territory on a fixed price and on a per minute basis, local private line services and enhanced calling features, such as voicemail, caller identification, call waiting and call forwarding. We also provide billing and collections services for other carriers under contract and receive revenues from directory advertising. A growing portion of our rural subscribers take bundled service plans which include multiple services, including unlimited domestic calling, for a flat monthly fee.

● Network access.  We receive revenues from charges established to compensate us for the origination, transport and termination of calls of long distance and other interexchange carriers. These include subscriber line charges imposed on end users and switched and special access charges paid by carriers. Switched access charges for long distance services within Alabama, Massachusetts, Maine, Missouri, New Hampshire and West Virginia are based on rates approved by the Alabama Public Service Commission, the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Cable, the Maine Public Utilities Commission (“MPUC”), the Missouri Public Service Commission, the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (“NHPUC”) and the West Virginia Public Service Commission, respectively, where appropriate. Switched and special access charges for interstate and international services are based on rates approved by the Federal Communications Commission.

● Cable television.  We offer basic, digital, high-definition, digital video recording and pay per view cable television services to a portion of our telephone service territory in both Alabama and Missouri, including Internet Protocol television (“IPTV”) in Alabama.  We are a reseller of satellite services for DirecTV.

● Internet.  We receive revenues from monthly recurring charges for digital high-speed data lines, dial-up Internet access and ancillary services such as web hosting and computer virus protection.

● Transport services.  We receive monthly recurring revenues for the rental of fiber to transport data and other telecommunications services in Maine.

13

Voice and Data Access Line Trends

The number of access lines served is a fundamental factor in determining revenue stability for a telecommunications provider. Reflecting a general trend in the RLEC industry, the number of rural voice access lines we serve has been decreasing gradually when normalized for territory acquisitions. We expect that this trend will continue, and may be potentially impacted by the effect of the economy on our customers. These trends will be offset by the growth of data access lines, also called digital high-speed Internet access service. Our competitive carrier voice and data access lines have grown as we continue to further penetrate our chosen markets. Our ability to continue this growth and our response to the rural trends will have an important impact on our future revenues. Our primary strategy consists of leveraging our strong incumbent market position, selling additional services to our rural customer base and providing better service and support levels than the incumbent carrier to our competitive customer base.

	Year Ended December 31,				March 31,
Key Operating Statistics	2008		2009		2010
RLEC access lines:
Voice lines		51,530		48,215		47,552
Data lines		18,709		20,066		20,614
RLEC access line equivalents(1)		70,239		68,281		68,166
CLEC access lines:
Voice lines		26,558		28,647		28,889
Data lines		3,246		3,428		3,467
CLEC access line equivalents(1)		29,804		32,075		32,356
Otelco access line equivalents(1)		100,043		100,356		100,522
Wholesale network connections		98,187		132,324		137,318
Cable television customers		4,082		4,195		4,239
Other Internet customers(2)		11,864		9,116		8,528

(1)	We define access line equivalents as voice access lines and data access lines (including cable modems, digital subscriber lines, and dedicated data access trunks).
(2)	Includes 9,213, 6,439 and 5,765 dial-up Internet customers and 1,468, 1,891 and 2,107 digital high-speed data customers at December 31, 2008, 2009, and March 31, 2010, respectively, that are outside of our traditional service territories and 1,183, 786, and 656 dial-up Internet customers at December 31, 2008, 2009, and March 31, 2010, respectively, that are in our traditional service territories.

In our RLEC territories, access line equivalents decreased by 115 during first quarter 2010, or 0.2%, compared to December 31, 2009. Voice access lines declined 1.4% while data access lines increased 2.7% during the period. We offer location specific bundled service packages, many including unlimited domestic calling, tailored to the telecommunications requirements of our customers.

In our Maine and New Hampshire CLEC operations, access line equivalents increased by 281 during first quarter 2010, or 0.9%, compared to December 31, 2009. Voice access lines increased 0.8% while data access lines increased 1.1% during the period. Virtually all of our competitive customers are businesses, with service bundles tailored to their specific business requirements. The Company continues to be impacted by delays in processing orders by FairPoint Communications, which provides the last mile connectivity for a large portion of our CLEC customers in Maine.

Competitive pricing and bundling of services have led Otelco’s long distance service to be the choice of the majority of the long distance customers in the rural markets we serve. Over 90% of our Maine CLEC customers have selected us as their long distance carrier. Our cable television customers increased 1.0% from December 31, 2009 to 4,239 on March 31, 2010.  Included in this number are 218 customers who have upgraded to our digital high-definition offer and 28 new IPTV customers during first quarter 2010. Other Internet customers decreased 6.5% to 8,528 on March 31, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009. This also includes the subscribers we service outside of our telephone service area throughout Missouri and Maine, reflecting the shift to digital high-speed Internet services. In Missouri, we are expanding our data access lines for digital high-speed Internet in selected areas outside of our telephone service territory.  Approximately 24.7% of the other Internet customers are served by high-speed data capability from Otelco.

14

Our Rate and Pricing Structure

Our CLEC pricing is based on market requirements. We combine varying services to meet individual customer requirements, including technical support and provide multi-year contracts which are both market sensitive for the customer and profitable for us.  The MPUC and the NHPUC impose certain requirements on all CLECs operating in their markets for reporting and for interactions with the various incumbent local exchange and interexchange carriers. These requirements provide wide latitude in pricing services.

Our RLECs operate in five states and are regulated in varying degrees by the respective state regulatory authorities. The impact on pricing flexibility varies by state. In Maine, our Saco River Telegraph and Telephone Company and Pine Tree Telephone and Telegraph Company subsidiaries have obtained authority to implement pricing flexibility while remaining under rate-of-return regulation. Our rates for other services we provide, including cable, long-distance, and dial-up and high-speed Internet access, are not price regulated. The market for competitive services, such as wireless, also impacts our ability to adjust prices. With the increase of bundled services offerings, including unlimited long distance, pricing for individual services takes on reduced importance to revenue stability. We expect this trend to continue into the immediate future.

Categories of Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses are categorized as cost of services and products; selling, general and administrative expenses; and depreciation and amortization.

Cost of services and products.  This includes expenses for salaries, wages and benefits relating to plant operation, maintenance, sales and customer service; other plant operations, maintenance and administrative costs; network access costs; and costs of services for long distance, cable television, Internet and directory services.

Selling, general and administrative expenses.  This includes expenses for salaries, wages and benefits and contract service payments (e.g., legal fees) relating to engineering, financial, human resources and corporate operations; information management expenses, including billing; allowance for uncollectible revenue; expenses for travel, lodging and meals; internal and external communications costs; insurance premiums; stock exchange and banking fees; and postage.

Depreciation and amortization.  This includes depreciation of our telecommunications, cable and Internet networks and equipment, and amortization of intangible assets. Certain of these amortization expenses continue to be deductible for tax purposes.

Our Ability to Control Operating Expenses

We strive to control expenses in order to maintain our strong operating margins. As our revenue shifts to non-regulated services and CLEC customers, operating margins decrease reflecting the lower margins associated with these services. We expect to control expenses while we continue to grow our business.

15

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth our results of operations as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2009			2010
Revenues
Local services		46.5	%		47.5	%
Network access		31.7			30.9
Cable television		2.4			2.6
Internet		13.9			13.6
Transport services		5.5			5.4
Total revenues		100.0	%		100.0	%
Operating expenses
Cost of services and products		41.8	%		41.1	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		14.0			12.5
Depreciation and amortization		26.7			23.6
Total operating expenses		82.5			77.2
Income from operations		17.5			22.8
Other income (expense)
Interest expense		(25.9	)		(23.2	)
Change in fair value of derivatives		(3.7	)		(3.4	)
Other income		0.9			1.3
Total other expense		(28.7	)		(25.3	)
Loss before income tax		(11.2	)		(2.5	)
Income tax benefit		4.0			1.0
Net loss available to common stockholders		(7.2	)%		(1.5	)%

Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2009

Total revenues.  Total revenues increased 1.2% in the three months ended March 31, 2010 to $25.8 million from $25.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009.   The table below provides the components of our revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period of 2009.

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Change
	2009		2010		Amount			Percent
	(dollars in thousands)
Local services	$	11,855	$	12,239	$	384			3.2	%
Network access		8,094		7,985		(109	)		(1.3	)
Cable television		607		666		59			9.7
Internet		3,541		3,511		(30	)		(0.8	)
Transport services		1,403		1,393		(10	)		(0.7	)
Total	$	25,500	$	25,794	$	294			1.2

Local services.  Local services revenue increased 3.2% to $12.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $11.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009.  The growth in CLEC revenue accounted for an increase of $0.8 million. RLEC revenue, including bundled services such as long distance, decreased $0.4 million reflecting the decline in RLEC access lines.

Network access.  Network access revenue decreased 1.3% to $8.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $8.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009.   Special circuits access decreased $0.4 million, partially offset by an increase of $0.3 million in interstate and intrastate switched access.

16

Cable television.  Cable television revenue increased 9.7% to $0.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $0.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009.  Growth in IPTV subscribers and the shift to high-definition packages in Alabama accounted for the increase.

Internet.  Internet revenue remained constant at $3.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.  The growth in new digital data access lines, including related equipment rental, and Missouri fiber leases offset the decline of dial-up Internet customers associated with the conversion to digital data access lines, including those customers in Maine and Missouri that are outside of our local service areas.

Transport services.  Transport services revenue remained constant at $1.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.

Operating expenses.  Operating expenses in the three months ended March 31, 2010 decreased 5.3% to $19.9 million from $21.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009.

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Change
	2009		2010		Amount			Percent
	(dollars in thousands)
Cost of services and products	$	10,666	$	10,610	$	(56	)		(0.5	)%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		3,577		3,231		(346	)		(9.7	)
Depreciation and amortization		6,792		6,084		(708	)		(10.4	)
Total	$	21,035	$	19,925	$	(1,110	)		(5.3	)

Cost of servicesand products.  Cost of services and products decreased 0.5% to $10.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $10.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009.  The growth in access and sales agent expense associated with increased CLEC revenue and toll costs in Missouri were offset by operational and network synergies in Maine and lower directory costs in Alabama.

Selling, general and administrative expenses.  Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 9.7% to $3.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $3.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009. Operational synergies, reduced legal and insurance costs and lower reserves for uncollectible amounts reduced expenses by $0.5 million. Increases in employee costs and operational and property taxes of $0.2 million partially offset the reductions.

Depreciation and amortization.  Depreciation and amortization decreased 10.4% to $6.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $6.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009. Amortization of intangible assets associated with the acquisition of three entities from Country Road Communications LLC decreased $0.6 million, including a covenant not to compete and contract customer base assets. The remaining decrease of $0.1 million reflected lower depreciation of plant assets in Alabama.

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Change
	2009		2010		Amount		Percent
	(dollars in thousands)
Interest expense	$	(6,599)	$	(5,989)	$	(610)		(9.2	)%
Change in fair value of derivatives		(951)		(886)		65		(6.8	)
Other income		226		359		133		58.8
Income tax benefit		1,025		262		(763)		NM

Interest expense.  Interest expense decreased 9.2% to $6.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $6.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009.   Half of the decline reflects the interest rate caplet expense present in first quarter 2009 that was fully expensed during 2009. The balance reflects a reduction of $5.0 million in senior debt principal in August 2009 and lower LIBOR rates, partially offset by the impact of a second fixed rate swap which took effect during first quarter 2010.

17

Change in fair value of derivatives.  We have two interest rate swap agreements to hedge our exposure to changes in interest rate costs associated with our senior credit facility. From an accounting perspective, the swaps do not meet the technical requirements to allow the swaps to be considered highly effective hedging instruments and therefore the swaps do not qualify for hedge accounting. These swap agreements must be considered investments and the change in value of $0.1 million is reflected as a change in fair value of derivatives. Over the life of the swaps, the cumulative change in value will be zero. See — Liquidity and Capital Resources below for additional explanation.

Other income.  Other income increased 58.8% to $0.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 from $0.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase was the result of increased CoBank dividends.

Income taxes.  Provision for income taxes was a benefit of $0.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and $1.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009.

Net loss.  As a result of the foregoing, there was net loss of $0.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and net loss of $1.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our liquidity needs arise primarily from: (i) interest payments related to our credit facility and our senior subordinated notes; (ii) capital expenditures; (iii) working capital requirements; (iv) dividend payments on our Class A common stock; and (v) potential acquisitions.

Historically, we satisfy our operating cash requirements from the cash generated by our business and utilize borrowings under our credit facility to facilitate acquisitions. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we generated cash from our business to invest in additional property and equipment, pay interest on our senior debt, pay interest associated with the subordinated debt inherent in our IDS units, and fund dividends on our Class A common stock (as declared by our board of directors) that are inherent in our IDS units. After meeting all of these needs of our business, cash grew from $17.7 million at December 31, 2009 to $21.2 million at March 31, 2010. The Company has as its current policy to return a high percentage of its available cash to its IDS unit holders.

Cash flows from operating activities for the first three months of 2010 amounted to $7.5 million compared to $6.3 million for the first three months of 2009.

Cash flows used in investing activities for the first three months of 2010 were $1.8 million compared to $1.2 million in the first three months of 2009. The higher rate of capital expenditures for property and equipment in first quarter 2010 accounted for the difference.

Cash flows used in financing activities for the first three months of 2010 and 2009 were $2.2 million, reflecting payment of dividends to stockholders in both periods.  The dividend was $0.17625 per share for the quarter in both periods.  We have paid twenty-one consecutive dividends at this rate since the Company went public in December 2004.

We do not invest in financial instruments as part of our business strategy. The Company has a $90 million notional amount interest rate swap with the Company paying 1.85% and the counterparty paying a variable rate based upon the 3 month LIBOR for three years beginning February 9, 2009 and a $60 million notional amount interest rate swap with the Company paying 2.0475% and the counterparty paying a variable rate based upon the three month LIBOR for two years beginning February 9, 2010. From an accounting perspective, the documentation for both swaps does not meet the technical requirements of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815, Derivatives and Hedging, to allow the swaps to be considered highly effective as hedging instruments and therefore the swaps do not qualify for hedge accounting.

We also have received patronage shares, primarily from one of our lenders, over a period of years for which there is a limited market to determine value until the shares are redeemed by the issuing institution. Historically, these shares have been redeemed at a value similar to their issued value. Due to the uncertainty of this future value, these shares are carried at approximately 55% of their issued value.

The Company currently expects to offer the holders of Class B common stock the opportunity to exchange their shares of Class B common stock for IDS units, on a one-for-one basis, during second quarter 2010. Assuming that all outstanding shares of Class B common stock are exchanged for IDS units, at the time of the exchange, the IDS units issued in the exchange will represent an additional $4.1 million in aggregate principal amount of senior subordinated notes due in 2019.  This debt is already included in the mezzanine section of our balance sheet. On March 15, 2010, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to register the IDS units to be offered in exchange for the shares of Class B common stock. On March 25, 2010, the Company filed an amendment to the registration statement. The SEC has not yet declared the registration statement effective.

18

We anticipate that operating cash flow, together with borrowings under our credit facility, will be adequate to meet our currently anticipated operating and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months.

The following table provides a summary of the extent to which cash generated from operations is reinvested in our operations, used to pay interest on our senior debt and senior subordinated notes or distributed as dividends to our stockholders for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2009			2010
	(dollars in thousands)
Cash generation
Revenue	$	25,500		$	25,794
Other income		226			359
Cash received from operations		25,726			26,153
Cost of services and products		10,666			10,610
Selling, general and administrative expenses		3,577			3,231
Cash consumed by operations		14,243			13,841
Cash generated from operations	$	11,483		$	12,312
Cash utilization
Capital investment in operations	$	1,229		$	1,753
Senior debt interest and fees		2,585			2,324
Interest on senior subordinated notes		3,366			3,366
Dividends		2,234			2,234
Cash utilized by the Company	$	9,414		$	9,677
Percentage of cash utilized by the Company of cash generated from operations		82.0	%		78.6	%

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements – a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (“ASU 2009-13”), an update to ASC 605, Revenue Recognition.  ASU 2009-13 provides application guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the deliverables should be separated, and how the consideration should be allocated to one or more units of accounting.  ASU 2009-13 establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable.  The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence, if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific nor third-party evidence is available.  The Company will be required to apply this guidance prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified for the fiscal year beginning on or after June 15, 2010; however earlier application is permitted.  The Company has not determined the impact that this update may have on its consolidated financial statements.

19

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”), an update to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.  ASU 2010-06 provides more robust disclosures about (1) the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and inputs used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and (4) the transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3.  The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements.  Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company has not determined the impact that this update may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2010-09”), an update to ASC 855, Subsequent Events.  ASU 2010-09 removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements.  Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  The FASB also clarified that if the financial statements have been revised, then an entity that is not an SEC filer should disclose both the date that the financial statements were issued or available to be issued.  The FASB believes these amendments remove potential conflicts with the SEC’s literature.  ASU 2010-09 is effective upon issuance except for the use of the issued date for conduit debt obligors, which is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2010.  The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Our short-term excess cash balance is invested in short-term commercial paper. We do not invest in any derivative or commodity type instruments, although our two interest rate swap agreements are technically not effective hedges and therefore do not qualify for hedge accounting. The change in the fair value of the swaps is charged or credited to income as a change in fair value of derivatives. Over the life of the swaps, the cumulative change in value will be zero.  Accordingly, we are subject to minimal market risk on our investments.

We have the ability to borrow up to $15.0 million under a revolving loan facility.  The interest rate is variable and, accordingly, we would be exposed to interest rate risk, primarily from a change in LIBOR or a base rate, should the facility be used.  Currently, we have no loans drawn under this facility.

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures

With the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).  Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2010.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the three months ended March 31, 2010 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 

20

PART II  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6.  Exhibits

Exhibits

See Exhibit Index.

21

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  May 7, 2010	OTELCO INC.
	By:	/s/ Curtis L. Garner, Jr.
		Curtis L. Garner, Jr.
		Chief Financial Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description
31.1	Certificate pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Chief Executive Officer
31.2	Certificate pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Chief Financial Officer
32.1	Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Executive Officer
32.2	Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Financial Officer