UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Amendment No. 3
to
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Under
The Securities Act of 1933

Approximate date of commencement of the proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. o

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. Neither we nor the selling stockholders may sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and neither we nor the selling stockholders are soliciting offers to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

LegalZoom.com, Inc. is offering 3,800,000 shares of its common stock and the selling stockholders are offering 4,200,000 shares of common stock. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders. This is our initial public offering and no public market currently exists for our shares. We anticipate that the initial public offering price of our common stock will be between $10.00 and $12.00 per share.

We have applied for listing of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "LGZ."

We are an "emerging growth company" under the federal securities laws and will be subject to reduced public company reporting requirements. Investing in our common stock involves risks. See "Risk Factors" beginning on page 14.

We and the selling stockholders have granted the underwriters the right to purchase up to an additional 1,200,000 shares of common stock to cover over-allotments.

The Securities and Exchange Commission and state regulators have not approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The underwriters expect to deliver the shares of common stock to purchasers on , 2012.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and is subject to change. No person should rely on the information contained in this document for any purpose other than participating in our proposed initial public offering, and only the prospectus dated , 2012, is authorized by us to be used in connection with our proposed initial public offering. The prospectus will only be distributed by us and the underwriters named herein and no other person has been authorized by us to use this document to offer or sell any of our securities.

Until , 2012 (25 days after the commencement of our initial public offering), all dealers that buy, sell, or trade shares of our common stock, whether or not participating in our initial public offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This delivery requirement is in addition to the obligation of dealers to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.

For investors outside the United States: Neither we, nor the selling stockholders, nor the underwriters have done anything that would permit our initial public offering or possession or distribution of this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than in the United States. Persons outside the United States who come into possession of this prospectus must inform themselves about, and observe any restrictions relating to, the offering of the shares of our common stock and the distribution of this prospectus outside of the United States.

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained in greater detail elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary is not complete and does not contain all of the information that you should consider in making your investment decision. You should read this entire prospectus carefully before making an investment in our common stock. You should consider, among other things, our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and sections titled "Risk Factors," "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this prospectus.

LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.

We believe that everyone deserves access to quality legal services so they can benefit from the full protection of the law. Our mission is to be the trusted destination where small businesses and consumers address their important legal needs and to be our customers' legal partner for life.

Overview

LegalZoom is the leading online provider of services that meet the legal needs of small businesses and consumers in the United States. We believe that we are transforming the small business and consumer legal services market by leveraging the power of technology and people. Our online legal platform enables us to deliver services at scale with a compelling combination of quality, customer care and value. Our services include a portfolio of interactive legal documents that are personalized by our customers through our dynamic online processes, as well as subscription legal plans and registered agent services.

We developed our easy-to-use, online legal platform to make the law more accessible to small businesses and consumers. Our scalable technology platform enables the efficient creation of personalized legal documents, automates our supply chain and fulfillment workflow management, and provides customer analytics to help us improve our services. For small businesses and consumers who want legal advice, we offer subscription legal plans that connect our customers with experienced attorneys who participate in our legal plan network.

We have served approximately two million customers over the last 10 years. In 2011, nine out of ten of the approximately 34,000 customers who responded to a survey we provided said they would recommend LegalZoom to their friends and family. Our customers placed approximately 490,000 orders and more than 20 percent of new California limited liability companies were formed using our online legal platform in 2011. We believe the volume of transactions processed through our online legal platform creates a scale advantage that deepens our knowledge and enables us to improve the quality and depth of the services we provide to our customers.

The Small Business and Consumer Legal Services Market

The law provides numerous benefits and protections to businesses and consumers. For example, entrepreneurs incorporate their businesses to shield personal assets, limit liabilities and help raise capital, and consumers use estate planning tools to ensure their assets are distributed according to their wishes and to minimize tax liabilities. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2009, there were approximately 26 million businesses with fewer than ten employees. We estimate that in 2010, approximately two million new businesses were formed in the United States. According to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, legal services in the United States in 2010 represented a $266 billion market. We estimate that in 2011 approximately $97 billion of legal services were provided to small businesses and consumers, based on a study conducted on our behalf by L.E.K. Consulting LLC.

Despite the enormous amount spent on legal services, we believe that small businesses and consumers have not been adequately served by the options traditionally available to them. Every year, small

businesses enter into legal contracts and become entangled in disputes, many of which require legal services to address. Consumers experience important life events that affect their families, including the birth of a child, marriage, divorce and death, all of which can also give rise to diverse needs for legal services. Small businesses and consumers often do not understand their legal needs or know where to start looking for an attorney. The high and unpredictable cost of traditional legal services also presents challenges. As a result, many small businesses and consumers often are unsure of or dissatisfied with the legal services available to them, and many either elect not to seek help or take no action to address their important legal needs.

Our Opportunity

We founded LegalZoom with a vision of combining the power of online technology with deep legal experience to create a scalable online legal platform that would fundamentally transform the way legal services are delivered to small businesses and consumers. We believe we are uniquely positioned to continue transforming the small business and consumer legal services market through the use of technology. Furthermore, there is a significant opportunity to expand the legal services market by making the benefits and protection of the law more accessible to small businesses and consumers. We are taking advantage of this opportunity by providing the following benefits to our customers:

•: Quality. Our deep legal knowledge, portfolio of interactive legal documents and subscription legal plans enable us to provide quality services designed to meet the specific needs of our customers.
•: Customer Care. We strive to deliver an exceptional customer experience, and we guarantee customer satisfaction.
•: Value. We believe that fixed, transparent pricing offers superior value compared to traditional hourly billing.

Our Strengths

Our key strengths include:

•: Leading Brand. We are the leading, nationally recognized legal brand for small businesses and consumers in the United States, with 60% aided brand awareness based on a survey we conducted using United Sample, Inc. in January 2012. We believe that we are redefining the small business and consumer legal services market and that the strength of our brand is enabling us to expand this market.
•: Deep Legal Knowledge. We have a deep understanding of the legal needs of small businesses and consumers based on over 10 years of experience serving our customers. We leverage our legal knowledge and team of experienced, in-house attorneys, often in consultation with outside attorneys from across the United States, to design, review and maintain our services. The high volume of transactions we handle and feedback we receive from customers and government agencies give us a scale advantage that deepens our knowledge and enables us to further develop additional services to address our customers' needs and refine our business processes.
•: Exceptional Customer Experience. Customer care is central to our culture and we are highly focused on providing exceptional customer experiences. Our online legal platform was designed to be easy for our customers to navigate and use. Our customers have access to live customer care representatives, and subscribers to our legal plans may consult with an experienced attorney licensed in their jurisdiction. If a customer is not completely satisfied with our services for any reason, we will attempt to correct the situation, or provide a refund or credit.

•: Advanced Systems and Processes. We have developed advanced systems and processes to efficiently deliver services at scale that meet the specific needs of our customers. Our technology allows us to efficiently serve thousands of small businesses and consumers every day. Our supply chain and fulfillment systems integrate external and internal technologies, enabling intelligent workflow management while increasing processing speed and efficiency.
•: Accessible Services. Our online legal platform allows customers to access our services from their home, office or anywhere they have an Internet connection. Our fixed, transparent pricing is often more affordable when compared to traditional hourly billing, and our subscription legal plans allow our customers to avoid the often difficult process of finding and meeting with an attorney.

Our Strategy

The key elements of our strategy include:

•: Expand and Improve Our Services. We plan to expand and improve the services we offer our customers to better address their legal needs and deepen our relationships with them.
•: Leverage and Grow Our Subscription Legal Plans. We intend to offer our subscription legal plans to a wider group of customers by making them available in additional states, bundling them with more of our services, and offering them on a standalone basis. We plan to invest in marketing campaigns to promote our subscription legal plans. Our aim is to reach a broader group of customers through our legal plans, including those who are unsure of their legal needs or who want the added comfort of speaking with an attorney.
•: Expand Internationally. We plan to replicate our U.S. model abroad in the near term, as we believe that our online legal platform represents a compelling value proposition to small businesses and consumers globally. We plan to partner with legal services providers outside of the United States to expand our operations internationally. We believe that the strength of our brand, focus on customer care, deep understanding of the legal needs of small businesses and consumers, and scalable technology will help us successfully enter markets outside the United States.
•: Continue to Build a Trusted Brand and Drive Awareness of Our Services. We will continue to build a trusted brand by delivering a compelling combination of quality, customer care and value. We plan to enhance our marketing activities to build our brand and increase awareness of our services. We plan to continue to make significant investments in marketing campaigns, including through online, television and radio advertising, to enhance our ability to acquire new customers and increase customer retention.

Our Services

Through our online legal platform, we offer a variety of services to meet the specific needs of small businesses and consumers.

Interactive Legal Documents

Subscription Legal Plans

For small businesses and consumers who want legal advice, we offer legal plans that connect subscribers with experienced attorneys licensed in their jurisdiction to address their specific legal needs. In order to be considered for participation in our legal plan network, independent attorneys must satisfy certain quality standards established by us and be highly focused on customer care. Our small business and consumer subscription legal plans are currently available in 40 states and the District of Columbia. Our subscription legal plans include free attorney consultations on new legal matters, review of our interactive legal documents, and discounts on LegalZoom services and additional services provided by legal plan network attorneys.

Subscription Registered Agent Services and Other Services

We offer subscription registered agent services for business entities, who are required to appoint and maintain a registered agent in their state of formation to receive service of process and official government communications. We offer other services to our customers, including unlimited access to our forms library, electronic storage of applicable LegalZoom documents and document revisions. We also introduce our customers to relevant non-legal services and products through our relationships with leading credit card companies, commercial banks and other companies serving our customer base.

Risks Associated with Our Business

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, as discussed more fully in the section entitled "Risk Factors" immediately following the prospectus summary and elsewhere in this prospectus. You should carefully consider these risks before making an investment in our common stock. Some of these risks include:

•: our business and services subject us to complex and evolving U.S. and foreign laws and regulations regarding the unauthorized practice of law, legal document processing and preparation, legal plans, privacy and other matters;
•: if we fail to provide high quality services, customer care and customer experience and add new services that meet our customers' expectations, we may not be able to attract and retain customers;
•: our business model is evolving from a transaction model to a combined transaction and subscription model, and our existing and new customers may not become subscribers;
•: if we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brand and reputation, or if we incur excessive expenses in doing so, our business may be adversely affected;
•: if our marketing efforts are unsuccessful, our ability to attract new customers or retain existing customers to our services may be adversely affected;
•: if we fail to safeguard our customers' information and privacy, our brand and reputation may be harmed, customers may curtail or stop using our services and we may face claims and potential liabilities;
•: we expect to face increasing competition in the online and offline legal services markets from law firms, solo attorneys, online legal document services, national legal plans and other service providers;
•: if we are unable to effectively manage and minimize errors, failures, interruptions or delays caused by third parties, or if our third-party service providers cease to do business with us, our ability to deliver our services may be adversely affected;

•: we depend on top talent, including our senior management team, to grow and operate our business, and if we are unable to hire, retain and motivate our employees, we may not be able to grow effectively;
•: we may experience significant disruptions in our online services or otherwise fail to ensure that our website is accessible; and
•: we are involved in several class action lawsuits and other litigation matters that are expensive and time consuming and that could be resolved adversely.

Recent Developments

For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we anticipate reporting total revenue of between approximately $48.0 million and $50.0 million as compared to revenue of $47.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and $40.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. We believe our estimated revenue increased, as compared to the second quarter of 2011, as a result of a year-over-year increase in the number of orders placed to approximately 133,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, and an increase in the total number of subscribers to approximately 300,000 as of June 30, 2012, as compared to approximately 122,000 number of orders placed for the three month ended June 30, 2011, and approximately 187,000 total number of subscribers as of June 30, 2011. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Metrics and Key Components of our Results of Operations—Revenues" and "—Unaudited Quarterly Results of Operations Data, Other Financial Data and Seasonality" for information regarding orders placed and number of subscribers.

For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we anticipate reporting net income of between $1.0 million to $1.6 million, as compared to a net loss of $55,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and net income of $2.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011.

We anticipate reporting non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended June 30, 2012 of between $3.4 million and $4.3 million as compared to $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and $3.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Our estimate of non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended June 30, 2012 reflects an estimated range for interest and other expense, net of between $30,000 and $50,000, estimated income tax provision of between $750,000 and $950,000, estimated depreciation and amortization of between $1.25 million and $1.35 million, and estimated stock-based compensation of between $325,000 and $375,000. Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. We define non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) plus interest and other expense, net; income tax provision (benefit); certain non-cash charges, including depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation; and loss from legal settlements. For a discussion about and reconciliation of non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and June 30, 2011, see "—Summary Consolidated Financial and Other Data—Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Unaudited Quarterly Results of Operations Data, Other Financial Data and Seasonality."

We have prepared the above financial data in good faith based on our preliminary review of our results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012. We are currently performing our quarterly closing procedures for the three months ended June 30, 2012, and, as such, this data represents the most current information available to management but is not yet complete, is subject to further review and could change materially. As a result, the anticipated results are not statements of historical fact and are forward-looking statements that are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. See "Special Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements." Our unaudited results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are expected to be filed with the SEC prior to the completion of this offering.

The preliminary financial data included above has been prepared by, and is the responsibility of, LegalZoom's management. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has not audited, reviewed, compiled or performed any procedures with respect to the accompanying preliminary financial data. Accordingly, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP does not express an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto.

Corporate Information

We were initially formed as a California corporation in July 1999, and we converted to a Delaware corporation in February 2007. Our principal executive offices are located at 101 North Brand Boulevard, 11^th Floor, Glendale, California 91203, and our telephone number at this address is (323) 962-8600. Our website is www.legalzoom.com. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website shall not be deemed incorporated into and is not a part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which it forms a part. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "LegalZoom.com," "LegalZoom," "company," "we," "us" and "our" refer to LegalZoom.com, Inc. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries.

We are not a law firm, and we do not provide legal advice. We provide self-help legal documents at our customers' specific direction and general information on legal issues generally encountered. Independent, licensed attorneys participate in our attorney network to provide services to our customers through our legal plans.

LegalZoom, the LegalZoom.com logo and other LegalZoom-formative marks are trademarks of LegalZoom.com, Inc. in the United States or other countries. This prospectus also includes other trademarks of LegalZoom.com and trademarks of other persons.

Reverse Stock Split

Our board of directors and stockholders approved a 2-for-3 reverse stock split of our common stock and a proportional adjustment to the conversion ratio of our Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock that will be effective immediately prior to the effectiveness of this initial public offering. We will issue cash in lieu of fractional shares in connection with this reverse split. All references to common stock, options and restricted stock units to purchase common stock, share, per share data and related information have been retroactively adjusted, where applicable, in this prospectus to reflect the reverse stock split of our common stock as if it had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented.

THE OFFERING


Common stock offered
By us		3,800,000 shares
By the selling stockholders		4,200,000 shares
Total		8,000,000 shares
Total common stock to be outstanding after our initial public offering		40,256,374 shares
Over-allotment option of common stock offered by us and the selling stockholders		1,200,000 shares
Use of proceeds		We currently intend to use the net proceeds to us from this offering primarily for general corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures associated with scaling our operations, technology and infrastructure to support our growth. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders. See "Use of Proceeds" on page 31.
Risk factors		See "Risk Factors" beginning on page 14 and the other information included in this prospectus for a discussion of factors you should carefully consider before deciding to invest in our common stock.
Proposed New York Stock Exchange symbol		"LGZ"

The total number of shares of common stock to be outstanding after this offering is based on 36,456,374 shares of common stock outstanding, as of March 31, 2012, and excludes, as of March 31, 2012:

•: 635,046 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options granted pursuant to our 2000 Stock Option Plan at a weighted-average exercise price of $0.93 per share, 4,382,599 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options granted pursuant to our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan at a weighted-average exercise price of $3.39 per share and 50,000 restricted stock units to be settled in shares of our common stock granted pursuant to our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan which will remain outstanding after this offering, unless earlier exercised;
•: 289,498 shares of common stock available for future issuance under our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan; and
•: 2,700,000 shares of common stock, subject to increase on an annual basis, reserved for future issuance under our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, which will become effective in connection with this offering.

Unless otherwise stated, information in this prospectus assumes:

•: 2-for-3 reverse stock split of our common stock and a corresponding adjustment to the conversion ratio of all outstanding preferred stock that will be effective immediately prior to the effectiveness of this offering;
•: that our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, which we will file in connection with the completion of this offering, is in effect;

SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA

The following tables summarize our consolidated financial data. You should read this summary consolidated financial data in conjunction with the sections titled "Selected Consolidated Financial Data" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our consolidated financial statements and related notes, all included elsewhere in this prospectus.

We derived the consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011, from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We derived the summary unaudited interim consolidated balance sheet data as of March 31, 2012 and the statements of operations data for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 from our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements were prepared on a basis consistent with our audited consolidated financial statements and include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the financial information contained in those statements. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in the future.

	Year Ended December 31,									Three Months Ended March 31,

	2009			2010			2011			2011			2012
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenues⁽¹⁾	$	103,299		$	120,771		$	156,066		$	38,288		$	46,988
Costs and operating expenses⁽²⁾:
Cost of services		53,082			60,643			80,437			20,459			22,847
Sales and marketing		32,673			36,322			41,891			12,388			15,651
Technology and development		4,686			7,509			8,117			1,869			2,071
General and administrative⁽¹⁾		13,154			20,024			19,343			4,596			6,167

Total costs and operating expenses		103,595			124,498			149,788			39,312			46,736

Income (loss) from operations		(296	)		(3,727	)		6,278			(1,024	)		252
Interest and other expense, net		(33	)		(15	)		(153	)		(51	)		(27	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(329	)		(3,742	)		6,125			(1,075	)		225
Income tax (provision) benefit		(311	)		(282	)		5,998			103			(280	)

Net income (loss)	$	(640	)	$	(4,024	)	$	12,123		$	(972	)	$	(55	)

Accretion of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock		(4,035	)		(4,038	)		(4,042	)		(997	)		(1,008	)
Net income attributable to participating securities		—			—			(3,407	)		—			—

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(4,675	)	$	(8,062	)	$	4,674		$	(1,969	)	$	(1,063	)

Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders⁽³⁾⁽⁵⁾:
Basic	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.42	)	$	0.22		$	(0.09	)	$	(0.05	)

Diluted	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.42	)	$	0.19		$	(0.09	)	$	(0.05	)

Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders⁽³⁾⁽⁵⁾:
Basic		18,700			19,360			20,925			20,832			21,088

Diluted		18,700			19,360			24,195			20,832			21,088

Pro forma net income (loss) per share⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾:
Basic:							$	0.34					$	(0.00	)

Diluted:							$	0.31					$	(0.00	)

Weighted average number of shares used in computing pro forma net income (loss) per share⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾:
Basic								36,181						36,344

Diluted								39,451						36,344

(1): We recorded an estimated charge of $5.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2010 related to legal settlements, of which $4.6 million was included as part of general and administrative expenses and $0.8 million was recorded as a reduction of revenues. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we recorded an additional $0.2 million charge related to a change in estimate of the settlement costs of these legal matters, which was recorded as a reduction of revenues. The ultimate costs of resolving these matters are dependent on a number of factors, including the resolution of any appeals of the approved settlements, actual claims made by, participation rates of, and the resulting payments, if any, to the class members. Any difference between the amount accrued and the ultimate costs of these matters will be recognized as an additional or lower expense in the period in which the matters are resolved. If the actual costs of these matters are higher than the amount we

estimated, this difference could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition. See Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for a full discussion of this legal settlement accrual.

(2): Stock-based compensation expense included in the above line items:

	Year Ended December 31,						Three Months Ended March 31,

	2009		2010		2011		2011		2012
	(in thousands)
Cost of services	$	200	$	178	$	155	$	48	$	39
Sales and marketing		124		46		56		15		33
Technology and development		114		155		133		40		40
General and administrative		699		929		600		163		220

Total stock-based compensation expense	$	1,137	$	1,308	$	944	$	266	$	332

(3): See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for a description of the method to compute basic and diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders.
(4): Unaudited basic and diluted pro forma net income (loss) per share has been calculated assuming the conversion of all outstanding shares of our redeemable convertible preferred stock (using the if-converted method) into 15,256,000 shares of our common stock as though the conversion had occurred on January 1, 2011. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
(5): All share, per-share and related information have been retroactively adjusted, where applicable, to reflect the impact of the 2-for-3 reverse stock split, including an adjustment to the preferred stock conversion ratio which will be effective immediately prior to the effectiveness of this offering.

	Year Ended December 31,									Three Months Ended March 31,

	2009			2010			2011			2011			2012
	(in thousands, except percent data)
Key Metrics⁽¹⁾:
Number of orders placed⁽²⁾		408			436			490			137			151
Number of subscribers⁽³⁾		47			116			228			163			274
Subscription revenues as a percentage of total revenues		5	%		9	%		18	%		12	%		21	%

(1): For additional information, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Metrics" and "—Unaudited Quarterly Results of Operations Data, Other Financial Data and Seasonality" for information regarding numbers of orders placed and number of subscribers.
(2): This metric represents total customer orders placed in the period, which may include one or more services purchased at the same time.

(3): This metric includes total paid and free subscribers at the end of a period.

				As of March 31, 2012

	As of December 31, 2011			Actual			Pro Forma⁽¹⁾			Pro Forma As Adjusted⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾
	(in thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	27,108		$	31,922		$	31,922			67,460
Working capital (deficit)		(2,316	)		(4,060	)		(4,060	)		33,215
Total assets		53,501			62,291			62,291			96,092
Total liabilities		50,620			58,866			58,866			57,129
Redeemable convertible preferred stock		62,691			63,699			—			—
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		(59,810	)		(60,274	)		3,425			38,963

(1): The pro forma consolidated balance sheet data gives effect to the automatic conversion of all outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock into an aggregate of 15,256,000 shares of common stock.
(2): The pro forma as adjusted consolidated balance sheet data gives effect to (i) the pro forma adjustments described in footnote (1) above, (ii) the sale of 3,800,000 shares of common stock in this offering by us at an assumed initial public offering price of $11.00 per share (the mid-point of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, and (iii) the exercise by a selling stockholder of an option to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock with total proceed to us of $89,800.

Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA

To provide investors and others with additional information regarding our financial results, we have disclosed in the table below and within this prospectus non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure. We define non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) plus interest and other expense, net; income tax provision (benefit); certain non-cash charges, including depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation; and loss from legal settlements. Our non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA financial measure differs from GAAP in that it excludes certain items of income and expense. Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA or the equivalent is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and others as a common financial measure of operating performance.

Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA is one of the primary measures used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate our financial performance and operating trends, including period to period comparisons, to prepare and approve our annual budget and to develop short and long term operational plans. Additionally, non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA is one of the key measures used by the compensation committee of our board of directors to establish the target for and ultimately pay our annual employee bonus pool for virtually all bonus eligible employees. We also frequently use non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA in our discussions with investors, commercial bankers and other users of our financial statements.

Management believes non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA reflects our ongoing business in a manner that allows for meaningful period to period comparisons and analysis of trends. In particular, in calculating non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA, we exclude certain income and expense items that we believe are not directly attributable to the underlying performance of our business, or are the result of long-term investment decisions in previous periods rather than day-to-day operating decisions, and may be used in future decisions for expansion and acquisition opportunities.

Our use of non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

•: although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect

cash capital expenditure requirements for such replacements or for new capital expenditure requirements;

•: non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
•: non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA does not consider the potentially dilutive impact of equity-based compensation;
•: non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us;
•: non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA does not include losses associated with, or reflect the cash requirements for, legal settlements; and
•: other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA differently, which reduces its usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, you should consider non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA alongside other financial performance measures, including various cash flow metrics, net income (loss) and our other GAAP results. We encourage investors and others to review our financial information in its entirety and not rely on a single financial measure.

The following table presents a reconciliation of net income (loss) to non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA for each of the periods indicated:

	Year Ended December 31,									Three Months Ended March 31,

	2009			2010			2011			2011			2012
	(in thousands)
Net income (loss)	$	(640	)	$	(4,024	)	$	12,123		$	(972	)	$	(55	)
Interest and other expense, net		33			15			153			51			27
Income tax provision (benefit)		311			282			(5,998	)		(103	)		280
Depreciation and amortization		2,937			3,509			4,562			1,002			1,244
Stock-based compensation		1,137			1,308			944			266			332
Loss from legal settlements		—			5,359			—			—			200

Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA	$	3,778		$	6,449		$	11,784		$	244		$	2,028

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this prospectus, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, before deciding whether to invest in shares of our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are not material, may also become important factors that adversely affect our business. If any of the following risks are realized, our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment.

Our business and services subject us to complex and evolving U.S. and foreign laws and regulations regarding the unauthorized practice of law, or UPL, legal document processing and preparation, legal plans, privacy and other matters. These laws and regulations may result in claims, changes to or discontinuance of some of our services, potential liabilities or additional costs that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects.

Our business involves providing services that meet the legal needs of our customers and, as a result, is subject to a variety of complex and evolving U.S. and foreign laws and regulations, including the following:

Additionally, we are required to comply with laws and regulations related to privacy and the storing, use, processing, disclosure and protection of personal information and other customer data.

Our business operations also subject us to laws and regulations relating to general business practices and the manner in which we offer our services to customers subjects us to various consumer laws and regulations, including false advertising and deceptive trade practices.

The scope of these laws and regulations are often vague and broad, and their applications and interpretations are often uncertain and conflicting. Compliance with these disparate laws and regulations requires us to structure our business and services differently in certain jurisdictions. We dedicate significant management time and expense to dealing with these issues and expect that these issues will continue to be a significant focus as we expand into other services and jurisdictions, including those outside the United States.

In addition, any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with applicable laws and regulations may subject us to regulatory inquiries, claims, suits and prosecutions. We have incurred in the past, and expect to incur in the future, costs associated with responding to, defending and settling such proceedings, particularly those related to UPL, and the provision of our services more generally. We can give no assurance that we will prevail in such regulatory inquiries, claims, suits and prosecutions on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Responding to, defending and/or settling regulatory inquiries, claims, suits and prosecutions may be time-consuming and divert management and financial resources or have other adverse effects on our business. A negative outcome in any of these proceedings may result in changes to or discontinuance of some of our services, potential liabilities or additional costs that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects.

If we fail to provide high quality services, customer care and customer experience and add new services that meet our customers' expectations, we may not be able to attract and retain customers.

The quality and value of our services, customer care and customer experience, as well as the quality of the services provided by the licensed attorneys who participate in our legal plan network, are critical to our ability to attract and retain customers. We have made substantial investments in developing our website, interactive legal documents, customer relationship management, automated supply chain and fulfillment, integrated digital workflow management and other dynamic online processes that comprise our online legal platform to improve the quality of our services, customer care and customer experience. We also intend to add new services such as our legal plans and enhance our existing services. We may fail to attract new customers or lose existing customers if these or future development efforts or services fail to meet changing customer preferences on a timely basis or if the licensed attorneys who participate in our legal plan network fail to provide high quality services, customer care and customer experience. If we are unable to attract new customers or lose existing customers, our business, revenues, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects would be adversely affected.

Our business model is evolving from a transaction model to a combined transaction and subscription model. If a sufficient number of our existing and new customers do not become subscribers, our business, revenues, results of operations and future prospects would be adversely affected.

Our revenues have historically been derived mostly from providing business formation, estate planning and other interactive legal documents to our customers for a one-time fee. In 2010, we began offering subscription legal plans for small businesses and consumers. Providing access to attorneys in a legal plan network to small businesses and consumers via the Internet is in large part commercially untested. We have invested, and intend to continue to invest, in expanding our subscription services for small businesses and consumers, including continuing to develop technology and infrastructure to support our legal plans and attorney network and expanding our sales and marketing efforts, particularly to promote legal plans and our brand. We expect our total operating expenses to increase in the foreseeable future as a result of continued investments in our subscription legal plan services. These investments will occur in advance of realizing any benefit from such investments, and therefore it may be difficult for us to determine if we are effectively allocating resources in these areas. In addition, we cannot predict whether sufficient numbers of our existing or new customers will subscribe to our legal plans or other subscription services. If we are unable to attract new subscribers to grow our legal plan services or our existing subscribers cancel their legal plan or other subscriptions, or if we are unable to attract attorneys to our legal network, our revenues, results of operations and future prospects would be adversely affected.

Our business depends on a strong brand and reputation. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brand and reputation, or if we incur excessive expenses in doing so, our business, revenues and results of operations may be adversely affected.

We believe our brand has contributed to the success of our business and we have made substantial investments to build and strengthen our brand and reputation. Maintaining and enhancing the LegalZoom brand and our reputation is critical to growing and retaining our customer base. Regulatory proceedings, consumer claims, litigation, customer complaints or negative publicity through word-of-mouth, social media outlets, blogs, the Better Business Bureau and other sources related to our business practices, services, customer care, data privacy, security issues, or reputation of our endorsers irrespective of their validity, could diminish confidence in our services and adversely affect our brand and reputation and our ability to attract and retain customers. In addition, maintaining and enhancing our brand and reputation may require us to incur significant expenses and make substantial investments, which may not be successful. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brand and reputation, or if we incur excessive expenses in doing so, our business, revenues and our results of operations may be adversely affected.

If our marketing efforts are unsuccessful, our ability to attract new customers or retain existing customers to our services may be adversely affected, which may adversely affect our business, revenues, results of operations and future prospects.

Our ability to attract new customers and retain existing customers to our services depends in large part on the success of our marketing channels. Our primary marketing channels to generate traffic for our website include search engine marketing, television and radio.

We rely on both algorithmic and paid listing Internet search results to drive customer traffic to our website. Algorithmic listings are determined and displayed solely by a set of formulas designed by Internet search engine companies, such as Google and Bing. Paid listings can be purchased and then are displayed if particular words or terms are included in a customer's Internet search. We bid on words or terms we expect customers will use to search for our services in the search engine's auction system for preferred placement on its results page. Placement in paid listings is generally not determined solely on the bid price, but also takes into account the search engines' assessment of the quality of the website featured in the paid listing and other factors. Our ability to maintain or increase customer traffic to our website from Internet search engines is not entirely within our control. For example, Internet search engines sometimes revise their algorithms to optimize their search result listings or maintain their internal standards and strategies. Changes in search algorithms could cause our websites to receive less favorable placement and reduce traffic to our website. In addition, we bid for paid listings against our competitors and third parties that may outbid us for preferred placement, which could adversely impact advertising efficiency and customer acquisition efforts. If competition for paid listings increases, we may be required to increase our marketing expenses or reduce the number or prominence of these paid listings. If we reduce our Internet search engine advertising, the number of customers who visit our website could decline significantly.

In our radio advertising, we currently rely heavily on the use of advertisements featuring exclusive endorsements from prominent on-air radio personalities to drive prospects to our website. A loss of our relationships with, or decline in the reputation or effectiveness of, any endorser could reduce our prospective traffic or harm our brand.

A reduction or loss of any of our advertising channels may adversely affect our ability to attract new customers to our services, which could adversely affect our business, revenues, results of operations and future prospects.

If we fail to safeguard our customers' information and privacy, our brand and reputation may be harmed, customers may curtail or stop using our services and we may face claims and potential liabilities, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects.

Our online legal platform involves the receipt, use, storage, processing and transmission of information from and about our customers, some of which may be personal or confidential. We rely on encryption and authentication technology licensed from third parties to secure the storage and transmission of customer information. Sophistication of intrusion techniques used to gain unauthorized access to or sabotage systems change frequently and are generally not recognized until launched against a target. We may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures. Third parties may also attempt to fraudulently induce our employees or customers to disclose information in order to gain access to customer information. A third party that is able to circumvent our security measures could misappropriate customer or proprietary information or cause interruptions in our business and operations. Computer malware, viruses, hacking and phishing attacks, and spamming could also harm our business and operations. If an actual or perceived breach of our security measures occurs as a result of third-party action, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, our brand and reputation may be harmed, customers may curtail or stop using our services and we may face claims and potential liabilities, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects.

Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations that may cause our results of operations to vary from period to period.

Many of the factors that contribute to seasonal fluctuations in our results of operations are out of our control. We have experienced, and expect that we will continue to experience, seasonality in the number of orders placed. Customers tend to place a higher number of orders in the first quarter of the year as we believe the demand for forming businesses is the highest at the beginning of the year. Further seasonality is reflected in the timing of our revenue recognition in the second quarter, when we typically recognize a high amount of revenues from orders placed in the first quarter but fulfilled in the second quarter. Also, we generally see demand for our services decline around the beginning of the third quarter with summer vacations and in the last two months of the fourth quarter around the winter holidays. We expect this seasonality to continue into the future, which may cause period to period fluctuations in certain of our operating results and financial metrics and thus limit our ability to predict our future results.

We expect to face increasing competition in the online and offline legal services markets from law firms, solo attorneys, online legal document services, national legal plans and other service providers and our failure to effectively compete with these providers may adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects.

We face intense competition from law firms and solo attorneys, online legal document services, national legal plans and other service providers. The online legal document services market is evolving rapidly and is becoming increasingly competitive. Other companies that focus on the online legal document services market, such as BizFilings, RocketLawyer, and The Company Corporation, and law firms that may elect to pursue the online legal document services market, can and do directly compete with us. Law firms and solo attorneys, who provide in-person consultations and are able to provide direct legal advice that we cannot offer due to laws and regulations regarding UPL, compete with us offline and have and may develop competing online legal services. We also compete with several national legal plans, including Hyatt Legal Plans (a MetLife company), ARAG and LegalShield. Many legal plan competitors have focused on employer-sponsored markets or have acquired customers through in-person multi-level marketing. At least one of these competitors, LegalShield, has recently rebranded itself from a multi-level marketing operation to a direct-to-consumer operation that more closely competes with our legal plans. Other legal plan companies may similarly decide to migrate into the direct-to-consumer market and offer plans that compete with ours. We compete in the registered agent services business with several companies, including

CT Corporation and Corporation Services Company, and these competitors have extensive experience in this market.

Our competitors, whether they are online legal document providers, legal plan providers, law firms or solo attorneys, may also be developing innovative and cost-effective services that target our existing and potential customers. We expect to face increasing competition from offline and online legal services providers in our market, and our failure to effectively compete with these providers may adversely affect our business, results of operations and future prospects.

If we are unable to effectively manage and minimize errors, failures, interruptions or delays caused by third parties, or if our third-party service providers cease to do business with us, our ability to deliver services to our customers, business, brand and reputation and results of operations may be adversely affected.

We rely on third parties to fulfill portions of the services we offer and to support our operations. For example, we rely on government agencies, including secretary of state offices and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, to process business formation documents and intellectual property applications. If these agencies are unable to process submissions in a timely manner, our brand and reputation may be adversely affected or customers may seek other avenues for their business formation or intellectual property needs. We have other third parties who fulfill our services, including the independent attorneys in our legal plan network. If we cannot attract additional, qualified attorneys into our legal plan network to service the needs of our legal plan subscribers, we may not be able grow our legal plan subscription business effectively and our business, revenues, results of operations and future prospects may be adversely affected. Our data centers, which host many facets of our online legal platform, are also operated out of third-party facilities, and we rely on third-party technology licenses for many aspects of our operations. We exercise limited control over these third parties, which increases our vulnerability to problems with the products and services they provide for us. These third parties may also be subject to financial issues and other unanticipated problems or events. Delays in the services provided by the third parties we rely on could result in deferred revenue recognition. If we are unable to effectively manage and minimize errors, failures, interruptions or delays caused by third parties, or if our third-party service providers cease to do business with us, our ability to deliver services to our customers, business, brand and reputation and results of operations may be adversely effected.

If we fail to effectively manage our growth, our business, brand and reputation, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

We have experienced, and continue to experience, rapid growth in headcount and operations, which has placed, and will continue to place significant demands on our management team and our operational and financial infrastructure. As we continue to grow, we must effectively integrate, develop and motivate a large number of new employees, and maintain the beneficial aspects of our corporate culture. To attract top talent, we have had to offer, and believe we will need to continue to offer, highly competitive compensation packages before we can validate the productivity of those employees. The risks of over-hiring or over compensating and the challenges of integrating a rapidly growing employee base into our corporate culture are exacerbated by our expected international expansion.

Additionally, if we do not effectively manage our growth, the quality of our services could suffer, which could adversely affect our business, brand and reputation, results of operations and financial condition. If operational, technology and infrastructure improvements are not implemented successfully, our ability to manage our growth will be impaired and we may have to make significant additional expenditures to address these issues. To effectively manage our growth, we will need to continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls and our reporting systems and procedures. This will require that we refine our information technology systems to maintain effective online services and enhance information and communication systems to ensure that our employees effectively communicate with each other and our growing base of customers. These system enhancements and

improvements will require significant incremental and ongoing capital expenditures and allocation of valuable management and employee resources. If we fail to implement these improvements and maintenance programs effectively, our ability to manage our expected growth and comply with the rules and regulations that are applicable to publicly reporting companies will be impaired and we may incur additional expenses.

We expect to invest significant resources in pursuing opportunities in new products and markets and expect our expenses to increase as we broaden our customer base, hire additional employees and expand internationally. Historically, our costs have increased each year due to new opportunities and investments in technology, and we expect these costs to increase including as a result of additional investments in software licenses and data centers to support our anticipated future growth. Our expenses may be greater than we anticipate, and our investments to make our business and our online legal platform more efficient may not be successful. In addition, we may increase marketing, sales, and other operating expenses to grow and expand our operations and to remain competitive. Increases in our costs may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition, including, for example, that we expect to make investments over the next few quarters to grow our business that will reduce non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA and compress related margins.

We may be unsuccessful in expanding our operations internationally, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects.

We are considering expanding our operations internationally in the near term, which may not be successful. Expanding internationally may subject us to new risks or increase risks that we currently face, including risks associated with:

As a result of these obstacles, we may find it difficult or prohibitively expensive to expand internationally, and we may be unsuccessful in our attempt to do so, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects.

Adverse application of existing tax laws, rules or regulations or implementation of new unfavorable laws, rules or regulations, could adversely affect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The application of domestic and international sales, use, occupancy, value-added, payroll and other tax laws, rules and regulations to our services is subject to interpretation by the applicable authorities. We currently pay sales or other transaction taxes for certain services in jurisdictions where we do business. A successful assertion by any state, local jurisdiction or country that we should be paying sales or other transaction taxes on services with respect to which we have not been paying such taxes, or the imposition of new laws requiring the payment of sales or other transaction taxes on services in which we do not currently pay such taxes, or increase in the tax rates, or some combination of the foregoing, could result in substantial increase in our sales and other transaction taxes, create increased administrative burdens or costs, discourage customers from purchasing services from us, decrease our ability to compete or otherwise adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The current administration in the United States has publicly stated that international tax reform is a priority, and key members of the United States Congress have conducted hearings and proposed new legislation in that area. Recent changes to U.S. tax laws, including limitations on the ability of taxpayers to claim and use foreign tax credits and the deferral of certain tax deductions until earnings outside of the United States are repatriated to the United States, as well as changes to applicable tax laws that may be enacted in the future, could impact the tax treatment of our foreign earnings. Given our plans to expand internationally in the near term, any changes in the U.S. taxation of such activities may increase our worldwide effective tax rate which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We depend on top talent, including our senior management team, to grow and operate our business, and if we are unable to hire, retain and motivate our employees, we may not be able to grow effectively which may adversely affect our business and future prospects.

Our future success will depend upon our continued ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate and retain top talent. Competition for such talent is intense. If we are not able to effectively attract and retain quality employees, our ability to achieve our strategic objectives will be adversely impacted, our brand or reputation could suffer and our business will be adversely affected. Our ability to execute efficiently depends upon contributions from all of our employees, in particular our chief executive officer, John Suh, and the rest of our senior management team. Key institutional knowledge remains with a small group of long-term employees and directors whom we may not be able to retain. In addition, from time to time, there may be changes in our senior management team that may be disruptive to our business. If our senior management team, including any new hires that we may make, fails to work together effectively and execute our plans and strategies on a timely basis, our business and future prospects may be adversely affected.

We may not effectively ensure that our website is accessible and any significant disruption in our online services could adversely affect our business, brand and reputation, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects.

A key element of our continued growth is the ability of our customers to access our website and our ability to fulfill orders. Our systems may not be adequately designed with the necessary reliability to avoid performance delays, disruptions or outages that could be harmful to our business. At times we have experienced, or may in the future experience, website disruptions, outages, and other performance problems due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure maintenance, human or software errors,

capacity constraints, denial-of-service, fraud or security attacks. In some instances, we may not be able to identify the cause or causes of these website performance problems within an acceptable period of time. It may become increasingly difficult to maintain and improve our website performance, especially during peak usage times, if the number of online services we offer increases, our services become more complex, or our customer traffic grows. If our website is unavailable when customers attempt to access it, our customers may seek other solutions to address their legal needs and may not return to our website in the future. To the extent that we do not effectively address future capacity constraints, upgrade our systems as needed and continually develop our online legal platform to accommodate actual and anticipated technology changes, our business, brand and reputation, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects could be adversely affected.

Our product fulfillment locations and data centers are vulnerable to damage or interruption from natural disasters, power losses, telecommunication failures, terrorist attacks, human errors, break-ins and similar events. The occurrence of a natural disaster or other unanticipated problems at our facilities could result in lengthy interruptions in our services. We may not be able to efficiently relocate our fulfillment and delivery operations due to disruptions in service if one of these events occurs and our insurance coverage may be insufficient to compensate us for such losses. Because the Los Angeles area is located in an earthquake fault zone, we are particularly sensitive to the risk of damage to, or total destruction of, our primary office and one of our key fulfillment and delivery centers. We are not insured against any such loss or expense that may result from a disruption to our business due to earthquakes, which, if incurred, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are involved in several litigation matters that are expensive and time consuming, and, if resolved adversely, could harm our business, brand and reputation, financial condition or results of operations.

We are involved in several lawsuits brought by customers or other parties alleging that we engage in the unauthorized practice of law or otherwise violate the law. The plaintiffs in these actions generally seek disgorgement, monetary damages, penalties, and/or injunctive relief. For example, class action lawsuits were filed against us in California state court in September 2009 and May 2010 alleging, primarily, that we failed to comply with the California Legal Document Assistance Act, engaged in unfair business practices and made misrepresentations in our business operations. Between the cases, plaintiffs sought to have all contracts between LegalZoom and its customers for the prior four years declared void, a return of all revenues generated from these customers, punitive damages, penalties and injunctive relief. A statewide class action lawsuit was filed against us in Missouri state court in December 2009, alleging that we were engaged in the unauthorized practice of law and had violated the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act and seeking damages of five years of fees charged to Missouri customers with the fees from the two years immediately preceding the complaint trebled and an injunction enjoining us from continued operation in Missouri. While we have denied and continue to deny all of the allegations and claims asserted in these lawsuits, without admitting liability, and to avoid additional legal costs to defend these matters, we signed settlement agreements to resolve the claims in the California cases in June 2011 and the Missouri case in August 2011. The maximum settlement for these matters, assuming all eligible claimants made a valid claim, was estimated to be $16 million. The ultimate cost of these two pending settlements are dependent on a number of factors, including the resolution of any appeals of the approved California settlement, and actual claims made by, and the resulting payments to, the class members. As of December 31, 2011, we had reasonably estimated the collective range of aggregate probable losses for these matters to be between $5.4 million and $7 million and, in accordance with GAAP, had accrued $5.4 million included in other current liabilities, the low end of the range. The determination of the probability of loss and the range of loss requires significant judgement. The range of loss has been estimated based on an analysis of numerous factors, including possible claim amounts within the class, whether the claim amounts are payable in-kind or in cash, the date when the services subject to the class were sold, comparable class action settlement and redemption rate statistics, experience available from other companies for similar types of settlements, and the claims rates to date. Based on the claims received through May 14 and 15, 2012, the claims submission

deadlines for these two matters, and claims processed to date, we have reasonably estimated the collective aggregate probable loss to be approximately $5.6 million ($2.9 million estimated for the California matter and $2.7 million estimated for the Missouri matter), resulting in an additional $0.2 million of accrued expenses and other current liabilities as of March 31, 2012. The ultimate costs of these two matters are dependent on a number of factors, including the resolution of any appeals of the approved California settlement, and actual claims made by, and the resulting payments to, the class members. There is at least a reasonable possibility that we may incur an additional loss in excess of the amount accrued at March 31, 2012. We are unable to estimate the amount of additional loss or range of additional loss, if any, relating to these matters. If the actual payments for the settlements are materially higher than the amount estimated by us, this difference could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We anticipate that we will continue to be a target for such lawsuits in the future. Any litigation to which we are a party may result in an onerous or unfavorable judgment that may not be reversed upon appeal, or we may decide to settle lawsuits on unfavorable terms. In addition, defending these claims is costly and can impose a significant burden on management and employees, and we may receive unfavorable preliminary or interim rulings in the course of litigation. Any such negative outcome could result in payments of substantial monetary damages or fines, adverse effects on the market price of our common stock or changes to our products or business practices, and accordingly our business, brand and reputation, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

If we fail to adequately protect our website from computer malware, viruses, hacking, phishing and denial-of-service attacks, our brand and reputation and our ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers could be harmed.

Computer malware, viruses, hacking, phishing and denial-of-service attacks have become more prevalent in the online services industry. Denial-of-service attacks, a type of security attack which affects access to and speed of operation of our website, have occurred on our systems in the past, and may occur on our systems in the future. We have experienced two instances of service interruption as a result of denial-of-service attacks in the past. Both instances caused our website to be intermittently unavailable for several hours. Any failure to maintain performance, reliability, security, and availability of our interactive legal documents services and online technology platform to the satisfaction of our customers may harm our brand and reputation and our ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If we are unable to adequately protect our intellectual property to prevent unauthorized use or appropriation, the value of our brand and other intangible assets, as well as our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects may be adversely affected.

We rely and expect to continue to rely on confidentiality and license agreements with our employees, consultants and third parties, and on trademark, copyright, trade secret, and domain name protection laws, to protect our proprietary rights. In the United States and internationally, we have filed applications to protect elements of our intellectual property. We have no issued patents or pending patent applications. Third parties may knowingly or unknowingly infringe on or challenge our proprietary rights, and pending and future trademark or other intellectual property applications may not be approved. In addition, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which we operate or intend to operate our business. In these cases, we may expend significant time and expense to prevent infringement and enforce our rights. We cannot assure you that others will not offer services or concepts that are substantially similar to ours and compete with our business. If the protection of our proprietary rights is inadequate to prevent unauthorized use or appropriation, the value of our brand and other intangible assets may be diminished and competitors may be able to more effectively mimic our services,

business practices or operations which may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects.

We may in the future become party to lawsuits and other intellectual property rights claims that are expensive and time consuming, and, if resolved adversely, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

As we face increasing competition and gain an increasingly high profile, including in connection with our initial public offering, third parties may make intellectual property claims, file lawsuits or initiate other proceedings against us. In addition, we may introduce new services, including in areas where we currently do not compete, which could increase our exposure to intellectual property claims. Defending against lawsuits and other intellectual property claims is costly and can place a significant burden on management and employees. If claims are made against us, there can be no assurances that favorable final outcomes will be obtained and, if resolved adversely, may result in changes to or discontinuance of some of our services, potential liabilities or additional costs which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to risks related to accepting credit and debit card payments that may harm our business or expose us to additional costs and liabilities.

We accept payments from our customers primarily through credit and debit card transactions. For credit and debit card payments, we pay interchange and other fees, which may increase over time and raise our operating costs and lower profitability. We rely on a third party to provide payment processing services, including the processing of our credit and debit card transactions, and it could interrupt our business if this third party becomes unwilling or unable to provide these services to us. If our processing vendor has problems with our billing software, or the billing software malfunctions, we could lose customers who subscribe to our legal plans, registered agent services and other subscription services, which could decrease our revenues. In addition, if our billing software fails to work properly and, as a result, we do not automatically charge our subscribers' credit cards on a timely basis or at all, our revenues could be adversely affected.

We are also subject to payment card industry rules, certification requirements and rules governing electronic funds transfer, any of which could change or be reinterpreted to make it more difficult for us to comply. Our failure to comply fully with these rules or requirements may subject us to fines, higher transaction fees, penalties, damages, and civil liability and may result in the loss of our ability to accept credit and debit card payments, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

As we expand our business to jurisdictions outside the United States, we may be required to explore and adopt new payment methods and processes. This may require the development of software or application for licenses for billing and collection purposes. Our failure to timely and efficiently adopt those new methods and implement new processes could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects.

We are an "emerging growth company," and we cannot be certain if the reduced reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an "emerging growth company," as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden

parachute payments not previously approved. We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years, although we could lose that status sooner if our revenues exceed $1 billion, if we issue more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt in a three year period, or if the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30 before that time, in which case we would no longer be an emerging growth company as of the following December 31. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can also delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourself of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

If we are unable to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the market price of our common stock may decline.

As a public company, we will be required to maintain internal control over financial reporting and to report any material weaknesses in such internal control. In addition, beginning with our 2013 annual report on Form 10-K to be filed in 2014, we will be required to furnish a report by management on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We are in the process of designing, implementing, and testing the internal control over financial reporting required to comply with this obligation, which process is time consuming, costly, and complicated. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting beginning with our annual report on Form 10-K following the date on which we are no longer an "emerging growth company," which may be up to five full years following the date of this offering. If we identify material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, if we are unable to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting when required, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the market price of our common stock could be negatively affected, and we could become subject to investigations by the stock exchange on which our securities are listed, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources.

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and divert management's attention.

As a public company, we will be subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Despite recent reforms made possible by the JOBS Act, compliance with these rules and regulations will nonetheless increase our legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly and increase demand on our systems and resources, particularly after we are no longer an "emerging growth company." The Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file annual, quarterly, and current reports with respect to our business and operating results.

As a result of disclosure of information in this prospectus and in filings required of a public company, our business and financial condition will become more visible, which we believe may result in threatened or actual litigation, including by competitors and other third parties. If such claims are successful, our business and operating results could be harmed, and even if the claims do not result in litigation or are

resolved in our favor, these claims, and the time and resources necessary to resolve them, could divert the resources of our management and adversely affect our business, brand and reputation and results of operations.

We also expect that being a public company and these new rules and regulations will make it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee and compensation committee, and qualified executive officers.

The market price of our common stock may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the initial public offering price, if at all.

The initial public offering price for our common stock will be determined through negotiations between the underwriters and us and may vary from the market price of our common stock following our initial public offering. If you purchase shares of our common stock in this offering, you may not be able to resell those shares at or above the initial public offering price, if at all. We cannot assure you that the initial public offering price of our common stock, or the market price following this offering, will equal or exceed prices in privately negotiated transactions of our shares that have occurred from time to time prior to this offering. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

Furthermore, the stock markets recently have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market fluctuations, as well as general economic, political and market conditions such as recessions, interest rate changes or international currency fluctuations, may negatively impact the market price of our common stock. If the market price of our common stock after this offering does not exceed the initial public offering price, you may not realize any return on your investment in us and may lose some or all of your investment. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be the target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management's attention from other business concerns, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Future sales of our common stock in the public market could cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market after our initial public offering, or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress the market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. After this offering, we will have outstanding 40,256,374 shares of common stock, based on the number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2012. This number includes 8,000,000 shares that we and the selling stockholders are selling in this offering, and assumes no additional exercise of outstanding options.

All of the shares of common stock sold in this offering will be freely tradable without restrictions or further registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended or the Securities Act, except for any shares held by our affiliates pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act. On the date of this prospectus, 1,025,215 shares will be available for sale in the public market without restriction. Approximately 31,231,159 of the remaining shares of our common stock outstanding after this offering, based on shares outstanding as of March 31, 2012, will be restricted as a result of securities laws, lock-up agreements or other contractual restrictions that restrict transfers for at least 180 days after the date of this prospectus, subject to certain extensions.

Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated may permit our executive officers, directors and stockholders who have executed lock-up agreements with the underwriters to sell shares prior to the expiration of the restrictive provisions contained in such lock-up agreements. In addition, we may permit our stockholders and option holders who are subject to lock-up agreements with us and who are not subject to a lock-up agreement with the underwriters to sell shares prior to the expiration of the restrictive provisions contained in such lock-up agreements with us.

After this offering, the holders of 11,725,759 shares of common stock, or 29.13% of our total outstanding common stock, based on shares outstanding as of March 31, 2012 and giving effect to the sale of shares by us and the selling stockholders, will be entitled to rights with respect to registration of these shares under the Securities Act pursuant to an investors' rights agreement. If these holders of our common stock, by exercising their registration rights, sell a large number of shares, they could adversely affect the market price for our common stock. If we file a registration statement for the purposes of selling additional shares to raise capital and are required to include shares held by these holders pursuant to the exercise of

their registration rights, our ability to raise capital may be impaired. We intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register up to approximately 8.0 million shares of our common stock for issuance under our 2000 Stock Option Plan, our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan and our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. Once we register these shares, they can be freely sold in the public market upon issuance and once vested, subject to a 180-day lock-up period and other restrictions provided under the terms of the applicable plan and/or the option agreements entered into with option holders.

No public market for our common stock currently exists, and an active public trading market may not develop or be sustained following this offering.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. Although we expect to apply to list our common stock on the NYSE, an active trading market may not develop following the completion of this offering or, if developed, may not be sustained. The lack of an active market may impair your ability to sell your shares at the time you wish to sell them or at a price that you consider reasonable. The lack of an active market may also reduce the fair value of your shares. An inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital to continue to fund operations by selling shares and may impair our ability to acquire other companies or technologies by using our shares as consideration.

If you purchase shares of our common stock in our initial public offering, you will experience substantial and immediate dilution.

If you purchase shares of our common stock in our initial public offering, you will experience substantial and immediate dilution in the pro forma net tangible book value per share of $10.20 per share as of March 31, 2012, based on an assumed initial public offering price of our common stock of $11.00 per share, the midpoint of the price range on the cover page of this prospectus, because the price that you pay will be substantially greater than the pro forma net tangible book value per share of the common stock that you acquire. This dilution is due in large part to the fact that our earlier investors paid substantially less than the initial public offering price when they purchased their shares of our capital stock. You will experience additional dilution upon exercise of options to purchase common stock under our equity incentive plans, if we issue restricted stock to our employees under our equity incentive plans, or if we otherwise issue additional shares of our common stock. See "Dilution."

We have broad discretion in the use of the net proceeds from our initial public offering and may not use them effectively.

We intend to use the net proceeds to us from this offering primarily for general corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds for the acquisition of, or investment in, technologies, solutions, businesses or assets that complement our business or operations, although we have no present commitments or agreements to enter into any acquisitions or investments. However, we will have broad discretion over the uses of the net proceeds, and we may spend or invest them in ways that our stockholders disagree or that could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or publish negative reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will, to some extent, depend on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our shares or change their opinion of our shares, our share price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our share price or trading volume to decline.

We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future, which could reduce the attractiveness of our stock to some investors.

We currently intend to retain any future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business, and we do not expect to declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. As a result, you may only receive a return on your investment in our common stock if the market price of our common stock increases. In addition, our credit facility contains restrictions on our ability to pay dividends.

Delaware law and provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws that will be in effect at the closing of our initial public offering could make a merger, tender offer, or proxy contest difficult, thereby depressing the trading price of our common stock.

Following the closing of our initial public offering, our status as a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law may discourage, delay, or prevent a change in control by prohibiting us from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years after the person becomes an interested stockholder, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws that will be in effect at the closing of our initial public offering will contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more difficult, including the following:

These provisions could depress the trading price of our common stock or reduce the ability of someone to acquire the company at a premium to the trading price of our common stock.

This prospectus, including the sections entitled "Prospectus Summary," "Risk Factors," "Use of Proceeds," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Business," contains forward-looking statements. In some cases you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as "believe," "may," "will," "estimate," "continue," "anticipate," "intend," "could," "would," "project," "plan," "expect" or the negative or plural of these words or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning the following:

These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those described in "Risk Factors." Moreover, we operate in a competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time. It is not possible for our management to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements we may make. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this prospectus may not occur and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements.

You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that the future results, levels of activity, performance or events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur. Moreover, except as required by law, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of this prospectus to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.

You should read this prospectus and the documents that we reference in this prospectus and have filed with the SEC as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and events and circumstances may be materially different from what we expect.

Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this prospectus concerning our industry and the market in which we operate, including our general expectations and market position, market opportunity and market size, is based on information from various sources, on assumptions that we have made that are based on those data and other similar sources and on our knowledge of the markets for our services. These data involve a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates. We have not independently verified any third-party information and cannot assure you of its accuracy or completeness. While we believe the market position, market opportunity and market size information included in this prospectus is generally reliable, such information is inherently imprecise. In addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of our future performance and the future performance of the industry in which we operate is necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this prospectus. These and other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the estimates made by the independent parties and by us.

Neither we, nor the selling stockholders, nor the underwriters, have authorized anyone to provide any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectuses we have prepared. We take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. We and the selling stockholders are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of our common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or any sale of shares of our common stock. Our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects may have changed since that date.

We estimate that the net proceeds to us from the sale of the shares of our common stock offered by us will be approximately $35.4 million, based on an assumed initial public offering price of $11.00 per share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. If the underwriters' over-allotment option to purchase additional shares in this offering is exercised in full, we estimate that our net proceeds will be approximately $41.4 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of common stock by the selling stockholders.

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $11.00 per share would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering by approximately $3.5 million, assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Similarly, each increase (decrease) of one million shares in the number of shares of common stock offered by us would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering by approximately $10.2 million, assuming the assumed initial public offering price remains the same and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

The principal purposes of this offering are to create a public market for our common stock and thereby enable access to the public equity markets by our employees and stockholders, obtain additional capital and increase our visibility in the marketplace. We currently intend to use the net proceeds to us from this offering primarily for general corporate purposes, including working capital and up to approximately $5.0 million for capital expenditures, approximately half of which would be for capitalized software expenditures and the other half of which would be for other capital expenditures associated with scaling our operations, technology and infrastructure to support our growth. We may also use a portion of the net proceeds for the acquisition of, or investment in, technologies, solutions, businesses or assets that complement our business or operations, although we have no present commitments or agreements to enter into any acquisitions or investments. We will have broad discretion over the uses of the net proceeds in this offering. Pending these uses, we intend to invest the net proceeds from this offering in short-term, investment-grade interest-bearing securities.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings for use in the operation of our business and do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any further determination to pay dividends on our capital stock will be at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to applicable laws, and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business conditions, and other factors that our board of directors considers relevant. In addition, the terms of our credit facility contain restrictions on our ability to pay dividends.

The following table shows our cash and cash equivalents and our capitalization as of March 31, 2012:

	As of March 31, 2012

	Actual			Pro Forma			Pro Forma, As Adjusted⁽¹⁾
	(in thousands, except share and par value data)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	31,922		$	31,922		$	67,460

Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value: 7,628,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding, actual; no shares authorized, issued and outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted	$	63,699		$	—		$	—
Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value: no shares authorized, issued and outstanding, actual; 50,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted		—			—			—
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 66,180,000 shares authorized, 21,340,374 shares issued and 21,160,374 shares outstanding, actual; 66,180,000 shares authorized, 36,596,374 shares issued and 36,416,374 outstanding, pro forma; and 150,000,000 shares authorized, 40,436,374 shares issued and 40,256,374 shares outstanding, pro forma as adjusted		22			37			41
Additional paid-in capital		—			63,684			99,218
Treasury stock, at cost, 180,000 shares		(519	)		(519	)		(519	)
Accumulated deficit		(59,777	)		(59,777	)		(59,777	)

Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		(60,274	)		3,425			38,963

Total capitalization	$	3,425		$	3,425		$	38,963

If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between the initial public offering price per share of our common stock and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately after this offering. The historical net tangible book value of our common stock as of March 31, 2012 was a deficit of $5.1 million, or $(0.24) per share. Historical net tangible book value per share represents our total tangible assets, excluding deferred tax assets and deferred costs of this offering, less our total liabilities, divided by the number of shares of outstanding common stock.

After giving effect to the (i) automatic conversion of our outstanding preferred stock into our common stock immediately prior to the completion of this offering; (ii) receipt of the net proceeds from our sale of 3,800,000 shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $11.00 per share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us and (iii) the exercise by a selling stockholder of an option to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $2.245, for total proceeds of $89,800, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value as of March 31, 2012 would have been $32.1 million, or $0.80 per share. This represents an immediate increase in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value of $0.94 per share to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of $10.20 per share to new investors purchasing common stock in this offering.

The following table illustrates this dilution on a per share basis to new investors:

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $11.00 per share would increase (decrease) the pro forma net tangible book value, as adjusted to give effect to this offering, by $0.09 per share and the dilution to new investors by $0.91 per share, assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated expenses payable by us. Similarly, each increase (decrease) of one million shares in the number of shares of common stock offered by us would increase (decrease) the pro forma net tangible book value, as adjusted to give effect to this offering, by $0.23 per share and the dilution to new investors by $0.23 per share, assuming the assumed initial public offering price remains the same and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated expenses payable by us. If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, the pro forma net tangible book value per share of our common stock, as adjusted to give effect to this offering, would be $0.93 per share, and the dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share to investors in this offering would be $10.07 per share of common stock.

The table below summarizes as of March 31, 2012, on a pro forma as adjusted basis described above, the number of shares of our common stock, the total consideration and the average price per share, after giving effect to the conversion of all outstanding shares of preferred stock into common stock and exercise of a stock option by a selling stockholder, (i) paid to us by existing stockholders and (ii) to be paid by new investors purchasing our common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $11.00

per share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses.

The total number of shares of our common stock reflected in the discussion and tables above is based on 36,456,374 shares of common (including preferred stock on an as converted basis) outstanding, as of March 31, 2012, and excludes, as of March 31, 2012:

Sales by the selling stockholders in this offering will cause the number of shares held by existing stockholders to be reduced to 32,256,374 shares, or 80.1% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding after this offering, and will increase the number of shares held by new investors to 8,000,000 shares, or 19.9% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding after this offering. In addition, if the underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full, the number of shares held by the existing stockholders after this offering would be reduced to 77.5% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding after this offering, and the number of shares held by new investors would increase to 9,200,000 shares, or 22.5% of the total number of shares of our common stock outstanding after this offering.

You should read the following selected historical consolidated financial data below in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the consolidated financial statements, related notes and other financial information included in this prospectus. The selected consolidated financial data in this section are not intended to replace the consolidated financial statements and are qualified in their entirety by the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

The consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2010 and 2011 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We derived the summary unaudited interim consolidated balance sheet data as of March 31, 2012 and statements of operations data for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 from our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements were prepared on a basis consistent with our audited consolidated financial statements and include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the financial information contained in those statements. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future.

	Year Ended December 31,									Three Months Ended March 31,

	2009			2010			2011			2011			2012
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenues⁽¹⁾	$	103,299		$	120,771		$	156,066		$	38,288		$	46,988
Costs and operating expenses⁽²⁾:
Cost of services		53,082			60,643			80,437			20,459			22,847
Sales and marketing		32,673			36,322			41,891			12,388			15,651
Technology and development		4,686			7,509			8,117			1,869			2,071
General and administrative⁽¹⁾		13,154			20,024			19,343			4,596			6,167

Total costs and operating expenses		103,595			124,498			149,788			39,312			46,736

Income (loss) from operations		(296	)		(3,727	)		6,278			(1,024	)		252
Interest and other expense, net		(33	)		(15	)		(153	)		(51	)		(27	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(329	)		(3,742	)		6,125			(1,075	)		225
Income tax (provision) benefit		(311	)		(282	)		5,998			103			(280	)

Net income (loss)	$	(640	)	$	(4,024	)	$	12,123		$	(972	)	$	(55	)

Accretion of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock		(4,035	)		(4,038	)		(4,042	)		(997	)		(1,008	)
Net income attributable to participating securities		—			—			(3,407	)		—			—

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(4,675	)	$	(8,062	)	$	4,674		$	(1,969	)	$	(1,063	)

Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders⁽³⁾⁽⁵⁾:
Basic	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.42	)	$	0.22		$	(0.09	)	$	(0.05	)

Diluted	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.42	)	$	0.19		$	(0.09	)	$	(0.05	)

(1): We recorded an estimated charge of $5.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2010 related to legal settlements, of which $4.6 million was included as part of general and administrative expenses and $0.8 million was recorded as a reduction of revenues. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we recorded an additional $0.2 million charge related to a change in estimate of the settlement costs of these legal matters, which was recorded as a reduction of revenues. The ultimate costs of resolving these matters are dependent on a number of factors, including the resolution of any appeals of the approved settlements, actual claims made by, participation rates of, and the resulting payments, if any, to the class members. Any difference between the amount accrued and the ultimate costs of these matters will be recognized as an additional or lower expense in the period in which the matters are resolved. If the actual costs of these matters are higher than the amount we estimated, this difference could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition. See Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for a full discussion of this legal settlement accrual.
(2): Stock-based compensation expense included in the above line items:

The following table presents a reconciliation of net income (loss) to non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA for each of the periods indicated:

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read together with "Prospectus Summary—Summary Consolidated Financial Data," "Selected Consolidated Financial Data" and our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere within this prospectus. This discussion includes both historical information and forward-looking information that involves risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from management's expectations as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those discussed in the sections entitled "Risk Factors" and "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements."

We have served approximately two million customers over the last 10 years. In 2011, nine out of ten of the approximately 34,000 customers who responded to a survey we provided said they would recommend LegalZoom to their friends and family. Customers that completed orders for certain of our services are invited to take an email survey. Our customers placed approximately 490,000 orders and more than 20 percent of new California limited liability companies were formed using our online legal platform in 2011. We believe the volume of transactions processed through our online legal platform creates a scale advantage that deepens our knowledge and enables us to improve the quality and depth of the services we provide to our customers.

Our revenues consist primarily of transaction revenues and subscription revenues. We generate transaction revenues when we fulfill customer orders. We generate subscription revenues from customers who subscribe to our legal plans, registered agent services and unlimited access to our forms library. We also generate other revenues from fees we earn when our customers purchase products and services offered by certain third parties.

Our business is evolving from primarily a transaction model to a combined transaction and subscription model. As a result, we expect that subscription revenues as a percentage of our total revenues will continue to grow for the foreseeable future. We evaluate how we market and sell transaction services to optimize our subscription business, with the ultimate objective of increasing revenues from customers through additional orders and subscriptions, which we refer to as customer lifetime value.

We have consistently invested in building and growing our business. Other than $8.4 million of outside capital and cash provided by exercises of stock options, we have funded our operations and capital expenditures since inception from cash flows provided by operating activities.

Our management uses a number of financial and business metrics to evaluate and monitor the performance of our business, identify trends affecting our business, determine the allocation of resources and make decisions regarding our business strategies. We believe these metrics are useful to investors to understand the underlying trends in our business.

The following charts set forth our revenues, non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA and net income (loss) for each of the nine quarters ended March 31, 2012.

The following charts set forth the number of orders placed, the number of subscribers (as of period end) and subscription revenues as a percentage of total revenues for each of the nine quarters ended March 31, 2012.

Investment in Our Subscription Legal Plan Business. While we have a large transaction business for online interactive legal document services, we have invested, and will continue to invest, in expanding our subscription revenues from legal plans. This includes developing technology and infrastructure to support our legal plans and attorney network and expanding our sales and marketing efforts, particularly to promote legal plans and our brand. These investments will occur in advance of realizing any benefit from such investments, and therefore it may be difficult for us to determine if we are effectively allocating resources in these areas.

Investment in Customer Acquisition and Retention. We have invested, and expect that we will continue to invest, in the promotion of our services through our various customer acquisition channels, including search engine marketing, television and radio to acquire new customers and grow our business. We also invest in attracting and retaining customers with an objective of increasing overall customer lifetime value through product development and customer care initiatives. We continuously evaluate how we market and sell transaction services in order to optimize our subscription business.

Continued Adoption of Online Legal Services. Growth in number of orders placed, number of subscribers and total revenues will depend on continued customer adoption of online interactive legal documents and legal plans. Our business depends on our ability to build and maintain customer trust in the online legal services market and on our ability to broaden the market for small business and consumer legal services. The rate of adoption of online legal services will impact our ability to acquire new customers, increase our subscribers and grow our revenues.

Transaction Revenues. Transaction revenues are primarily generated from our legal document preparation services upon fulfillment of these services, as well as certain legal document preparation services that were bundled with one- and five-year document revision and vaulting services. Prior to the change in accounting guidance on how revenue recognition is applied to multiple deliverable arrangements that we adopted on January 1, 2010, the full value of these bundled services were required to be recognized as revenues ratably on a straight-line basis over the service period. Revenues are recognized upon fulfillment of services, predominantly when a completed set of documents is shipped to the customer. Transaction revenues are net of refunds, cancellations, promotional discounts, sales allowances, credit reserves and the value allocated to bundled free-trials for our subscription services.

Subscription Revenues. Subscription revenues are generated primarily when customers enroll in subscriptions to our legal plans, registered agent services or unlimited access to our forms library. We recognize revenues from our subscriptions ratably on a straight-line basis over the subscription term as such services are rendered. Subscription terms range from a period of 30 days to two years. Subscription revenues include the value allocated to bundled free-trials for our subscription services and are net of promotional discounts, cancellations, sales allowances, credit reserves and payments to legal plan attorneys.

Other Revenues. Other revenues consist primarily of fees earned from third-party providers for services provided to or leads generated for such providers through our online legal platform. We typically earn these revenues on a cost-per-click or cost-per-action basis.

We generally collect payments and fees at the time orders are placed. We record amounts collected for services that have not been performed as deferred revenues on our consolidated balance sheet. See "—Critical Accounting Policies—Revenue Recognition" for a description of the accounting policies related to revenue recognition, including arrangements that contain multiple deliverables.

Our cost of services include all costs of providing and fulfilling our services. Cost of services primarily include government filing fees; costs of fulfillment, customer care and inbound sales personnel and related benefits, including stock-based compensation, and costs of independent contractors for document preparation; telecommunications and data center costs, including depreciation and amortization of network computers, equipment and internal use software; printing, shipping and courier charges; credit and debit card fees; allocated overhead; legal document kit expenses; and sales and use taxes.

Our sales and marketing expenses are comprised of customer acquisition media, consisting primarily of search engine marketing, television and radio; compensation and related benefits, including stock-based compensation, for marketing and outbound sales personnel; media production; public relations and other promotional activities; general business development activities; and allocated overhead. Marketing and advertising costs to promote our products and services are expensed in the period incurred. Media production costs are expensed the first time the advertisement is aired.

Technology and development expenses consist primarily of personnel costs and related benefits, including stock-based compensation, and expenses for outside consultants. These expenses also include

allocated overhead and costs incurred in the development, implementation, amortization and maintenance of internal use software, including our website, online legal platform and related infrastructure. Technology and development costs are expensed as incurred, except to the extent that such costs are associated with internal use software or website development costs that are capitalized.

Our general and administrative expenses relate primarily to employee compensation and related benefits, including stock-based compensation, for executive and corporate personnel; professional and consulting fees; allocated overhead; and legal loss contingencies.

Interest and other expense, net, consists primarily of interest expense on our capital lease obligations, amortization of deferred financing fees and annual commitment fees on our revolving line of credit.

Our income tax (provision) benefit is comprised of current and deferred federal and state income taxes. Our current income tax provision is primarily related to state income taxes in jurisdictions where we generate taxable income. In 2011, our deferred federal and state income tax benefit was generated from the release of the valuation allowance pertaining to our federal and state net deferred income tax assets. In 2009 and 2010, we did not record any deferred income tax benefit or provision as we maintained a full valuation allowance against our federal and state net deferred income tax assets. See "—Critical Accounting Policies—Income Taxes."

We operate in one operating segment, providing legal document preparation and related subscription services. Our chief operating decision maker is our Chief Executive Officer, who manages our operations on a consolidated basis for purposes of evaluating financial performance and allocating resources. Our Chief Executive Officer reviews separate revenue information for our transaction and subscription services. All other financial information is reviewed by him on a consolidated basis. All of our principal operations, decision-making functions and assets are located in the United States. Assets and revenues generated outside of the United States are not material for any of the periods presented.

The following table sets forth our consolidated statements of operations data for each of the periods indicated. The period-to-period comparison of financial results should not be considered as a prediction or indicative of our future results.

	Year Ended December 31,									Three Months Ended March 31,

	2009			2010			2011			2011			2012
	(in thousands)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenues⁽¹⁾	$	103,299		$	120,771		$	156,066		$	38,288		$	46,988
Costs and operating expenses⁽²⁾:
Cost of services		53,082			60,643			80,437			20,459			22,847
Sales and marketing		32,673			36,322			41,891			12,388			15,651
Technology and development		4,686			7,509			8,117			1,869			2,071
General and administrative⁽¹⁾		13,154			20,024			19,343			4,596			6,167

Total costs and operating expenses		103,595			124,498			149,788			39,312			46,736

Income (loss) from operations		(296	)		(3,727	)		6,278			(1,024	)		252
Interest and other expense, net		(33	)		(15	)		(153	)		(51	)		(27	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(329	)		(3,742	)		6,125			(1,075	)		225
Income tax (provision) benefit		(311	)		(282	)		5,998			103			(280	)

Net income (loss)	$	(640	)	$	(4,024	)	$	12,123		$	(972	)	$	(55	)

(1): We recorded an estimated charge of $5.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2010 related to legal settlements, of which $4.6 million was included as part of general and administrative expenses and $0.8 million was recorded as a reduction of revenues. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we recorded an additional $0.2 million charge related to a change in estimate of the settlement costs of these legal matters, which was recorded as a reduction of revenues. The ultimate costs of resolving these matters are dependent on a number of factors, including the resolution of any appeals of the approved settlements, actual claims made by, participation rates of, and the resulting payments, if any, to the class members. Any difference between the amount accrued and the ultimate costs of these matters will be recognized as an additional or lower expense in the period in which the matters are resolved. If the actual costs of these matters are higher than the amount we estimated, this difference could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition. See Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for a full discussion of this legal settlement accrual.
(2): Stock-based compensation expense included in the above line items:

The following table sets forth our consolidated statements of operations data as a percentage of revenues for each of the periods indicated. The period-to-period comparison of financial results should not be considered as a prediction or indicative of our future results.

	Year Ended December 31,									Three Months Ended March 31,

	2009			2010			2011			2011			2012
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenues		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%		100	%
Costs and operating expenses:
Cost of services		51			50			52			53			49
Sales and marketing		32			30			27			33			33
Technology and development		5			6			5			5			4
General and administrative		13			17			12			12			13

Total costs and operating expenses		101			103			96			103			99

Income (loss) from operations		(1	)		(3	)		4			(3	)		1
Interest and other expense, net		—			—			—			—			—

Income (loss) before income taxes		(1	)		(3	)		4			(3	)		1
Income tax (provision) benefit		—			—			4			—			(1	)

Net income (loss)		(1	)%		(3	)%		8	%		(3	)%		—	%

Total revenues increased $8.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 primarily as a result of increases in both transaction and subscription revenues. Transaction revenues increased $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 primarily due to a 10% increase in the number of orders placed. The increase in the number of orders placed was largely driven by an increase in business formation services.

Subscription revenues increased $5.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, benefitting from a 68% increase in the number of subscribers across all of our subscription services combined with price increases for our legal plans that we implemented in February 2011. We expect our subscription revenues to grow as a percentage of total revenues as we continue to transition our business from a transaction model to a combined transaction and subscription model.

Other revenues increased $0.5 million primarily due to increased revenues from third-party products and services purchased by our customers.

Cost of services increased $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 primarily due to the growth in orders placed. The decrease in cost of services as a percentage of total revenues was largely attributable to the increase in subscription revenues, which have lower associated costs of services.

We plan to continue efforts to manage cost of services but expect total cost of services to increase as we fulfill greater volumes. However, with our business model evolving from primarily a transaction model to a combined transaction and subscription model, we expect the total cost of services as a percentage of total revenues to decrease over time as subscription services require less fulfillment labor and related costs.

Sales and marketing expenses increased $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, $2.3 million of which was attributable to increased spend on customer acquisition media, including search engine marketing, television and radio. The remaining increase was primarily attributable to increases in personnel and related costs and allocated overhead.

We have invested, and expect that we will continue to invest, in sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of total revenues are expected to increase in the near term, as we continue to invest in building our brand, particularly to promote our legal plans. Additionally, we plan to add marketing, sales and business development personnel, develop new campaigns and continue to invest in various forms of media. However, as we continue to grow and transform our business into a combined transaction and subscription model and achieve a higher scale for our services, we expect sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of total revenues to decrease over the long-term.

Technology and development expenses increased $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase was primarily attributable to increased compensation expense for additional technology hires, partially offset by the impact of capitalizing more software costs in the current period.

We have focused our technology and development efforts on improving and maintaining our internally-developed online technology platform, efficiency in operations and expanded infrastructure. As we grow our business, we expect to increase the cost of investment in technology and development in these areas and develop new services while enhancing the quality of customer experience for existing services, but we expect that technology and development expenses as a percentage of total revenues will remain relatively consistent over the long term.

General and administrative expenses increased $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 due to approximately $0.4 million in higher compensation expense for additional executive and corporate hires and $0.6 million in increased professional fees, including legal and audit fees for international expansion. We also experienced $0.5 million in increased rent, travel and other consulting costs and $0.1 million in increased accrued bonuses.

We expect our general and administrative expenses to increase as we continue to expand our operations, hire additional personnel, grant additional stock-based awards and transition from a private to a public company. Public company costs we incur will include quarterly and annual reporting and compliance costs, including ongoing evaluation and maintenance of our internal control over financial reporting, professional fees, exchange listing fees, shareholder and other investor communications, institution of an internal audit function and increased costs for directors' and officers' insurance and other support services. However, as we continue to grow and transform our business into a combined transaction and subscription model and achieve a higher scale for our services, we expect general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues to decrease slightly over the long-term.

Interest and other expenses, net decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2012 primarily due to lower interest expenses on capital lease obligations and amortization of deferred financing fees. We have no amounts outstanding under our line of credit and do not expect to draw on the line in 2012. We may also generate additional interest income on our investment of the proceeds from this offering.

We recorded an income tax provision of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, which included $0.1 million of change in deferred income taxes and $0.2 million of current state income taxes. We recorded an income tax benefit of $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

2011 Compared to 2010. Total revenues increased $35.3 million in 2011 as a result of increases in transaction revenues and subscription revenues. Transaction revenues increased $16.4 million in 2011 due to a 12% increase in the number of orders placed. We implemented a number of new initiatives in the fourth quarter of 2010 that we believe contributed to the overall growth in orders in 2011, including lowered pricing for certain business formation services, the introduction of flexible customer payment options for certain of our services and website enhancements that we believe improved customer experience and conversion. The increase in the number of orders placed was largely in business formation services, which tend to have a higher average order value. In addition, our revenues in 2010 also included a reduction of revenues of $0.8 million related to legal settlements described in "—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Loss Contingencies" and Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. No similar reduction to revenues was recorded in 2011.

Subscription revenues increased $17.0 million in 2011 with a 97% increase in the number of subscribers across all of our subscription services as a result of an expansion of our services. Our registered agent services benefited from a full year of expanded in-house operations in 2011, compared to only 10 months in 2010. Additionally, our legal plan services benefitted from an increase in legal plan prices and a full year of operations in 2011, compared to a partial year in 2010.

Other revenues increased $1.9 million due primarily to increased revenues from third-party products and services purchased by our customers.

2010 Compared to 2009. Total revenues increased $17.5 million in 2010. Transaction revenues increased $12.9 million primarily as a result of an increase in the number of orders placed and the recognition of $4.7 million of revenue from certain document preparation services due to the adoption of new revenue recognition rules as of January 1, 2010. See "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Revenue Recognition." The 2010 revenue growth was partially offset by the $0.8 million reduction of revenue related to legal settlements as further described in "—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Loss Contingencies" and Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Subscription revenues increased $5.9 million in 2010 primarily as a result of a 147% increase in the number of subscribers. The increase in the number of subscribers and subscription revenues was driven primarily by two factors. First, prior to 2010, we performed our registered agent services in only six states, with the remainder of the states serviced by third parties. In March 2010, we began to expand our in-house operations to perform our registered agent services in an additional 43 states and the District of Columbia. For registered agent services we perform, we recognize as revenues the full amount we charge the customer and record the related costs incurred in fulfilling those services in cost of services. For registered agent customers serviced by a third party, we recognize revenues net of the fees paid to the third party. Second, we launched both our legal plan and our forms subscriptions in 2010, with the initial offering in California in April and a further expansion to other states in August.

2011 Compared to 2010. Cost of services increased $19.8 million in 2011 primarily due to the growth in orders placed. The increase in cost of services as a percentage of total revenues was largely attributable to the strategic decision to reduce pricing of certain business formation services in the fourth quarter of 2010. This resulted in a shift in service mix toward business formation services, which have higher associated costs of services.

2010 Compared to 2009. Cost of services increased $7.6 million in 2010 due to the increase in number of orders placed and expansion of operations. During March 2010, we opened a new customer service and production center in Austin, Texas, increasing both direct and allocated overhead costs by $0.7 million in 2010 as compared to 2009. We also experienced increased fulfillment costs associated with the expansion of our registered agent services business beginning in March 2010.

2011 Compared to 2010. Sales and marketing expenses increased $5.6 million in 2011, $4.0 million of which was attributable to increased spend on customer acquisition media, including search engine marketing, television and radio. The remaining increase was primarily attributable to increases in personnel and related costs, and allocated overhead.

2010 Compared to 2009. Sales and marketing expenses increased $3.6 million in 2010, $3.4 million of which was attributable to increased spend on customer acquisition media.

2011 Compared to 2010. Technology and development expenses increased $0.6 million in 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to increased technology hiring and resulting compensation.

2010 Compared to 2009. Technology and development expenses increased $2.8 million in 2010. The increase was primarily attributable to the expansion of technology personnel and consultants for the development of our legal plan services, investments to improve operating efficiencies and to maintain and expand our infrastructure.

2011 Compared to 2010. General and administrative expenses decreased $0.7 million in 2011 because 2010 included a $4.6 million charge for estimated legal settlements with no similar charges in 2011. Excluding the legal settlements charge, further described in "—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Loss Contingencies" and Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, general and administrative expenses increased by $3.9 million in 2011, approximately $1.8 million of which was attributable to bonuses awarded for company performance. No bonuses for company performance were awarded in 2010. The remaining $2.1 million increase was comprised primarily of $1.3 million in higher compensation for and additional new hires of executive and corporate personnel and $0.8 million in increased legal and audit fees.

2010 Compared to 2009. General and administrative expenses increased $6.9 million in 2010, including a $4.6 million charge related to legal settlements. See "—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Loss Contingencies" and Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The remaining $2.3 million in increased general administrative expenses came primarily as a result of a $2.1 million increase in personnel costs and related benefits, including stock-based compensation, due to higher compensation and hiring, but was partially offset by lower bonus accruals. In 2010, we did not award any bonuses based on company performance compared to $1.1 million in 2009. The remaining $1.3 million is attributable to other expenses including costs associated with relocating our headquarters from Los Angeles to Glendale, California and opening our facility in Austin, Texas.

Interest and other expenses, net, increased $0.1 million in 2011 primarily due to increased interest expenses on capital lease obligations and amortization of deferred financing fees. Interest and other expenses, net, was immaterial in 2009 and 2010.

Our income tax provision in 2009 and 2010 consisted of state taxes in states where we generated taxable income. Our income tax benefit in 2011 consisted of the release of a valuation allowance of $6.9 million, partially offset by a provision for state and federal income taxes of $0.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Prior to 2011, we generated losses and federal net operating loss carryforwards and we were not subject to federal income taxes but provided for a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets. In 2011, we became profitable and achieved a three-year cumulative income before income taxes during the second half of 2011. We also generated sufficient taxable income to begin to utilize a significant portion our previously recorded federal net operating loss carryforwards. Therefore, based on the weight of positive evidence that our deferred tax assets are more likely than not realizable, we released the valuation allowance against our remaining net deferred tax assets during the fourth quarter of 2011, except for capital loss carryforwards, which we do not expect to utilize prior to expiration in 2012. See "—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Income Taxes."

We currently expect that we will continue to generate sufficient federal taxable income and be able to utilize our remaining net deferred tax assets available as of December 31, 2011. We also expect to continue to generate taxable income and pay income taxes in federal and state jurisdictions where we operate.

Unaudited Quarterly Results of Operations Data, Other Financial Data and Seasonality

The tables below set forth our unaudited quarterly consolidated statements of operations data and other financial data for each of the nine quarters ended March 31, 2012. We have prepared the quarterly consolidated statements of operations data on a basis consistent with the audited consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus. In the opinion of management, the financial information reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of this data. This information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. The results of historical periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for a full year or any future period.

	Three Months Ended

	Mar. 31, 2010			June 30, 2010			Sept. 30, 2010			Dec. 31, 2010			Mar. 31, 2011			June 30, 2011			Sept. 30, 2011			Dec. 31, 2011			Mar. 31, 2012
	(in thousands)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenues⁽¹⁾	$	30,146		$	31,206		$	30,734		$	28,685		$	38,288		$	40,671		$	40,507		$	36,600		$	46,988
Costs and operating expenses:
Cost of services		14,756			15,345			14,864			15,678			20,459			21,346			20,088			18,544			22,847
Sales and marketing		10,524			9,044			9,189			7,565			12,388			9,801			11,747			7,955			15,651
Technology and development		2,012			1,702			1,711			2,084			1,869			2,092			2,113			2,043			2,071
General and administrative⁽¹⁾		8,313			3,178			3,620			4,913			4,596			4,851			5,195			4,701			6,167

Total costs and operating expenses		35,605			29,269			29,384			30,240			39,312			38,090			39,143			33,243			46,736

Income (loss) from operations		(5,459	)		1,937			1,350			(1,555	)		(1,024	)		2,581			1,364			3,357			252
Interest and other income (expense), net		(12	)		(14	)		16			(5	)		(51	)		(23	)		(40	)		(39	)		(27	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(5,471	)		1,923			1,366			(1,560	)		(1,075	)		2,558			1,324			3,318			225
Income tax (provision) benefit		(435	)		153			174			(174	)		103			(246	)		(127	)		6,268			(280	)

Net income (loss)	$	(5,906	)	$	2,076		$	1,540		$	(1,734	)	$	(972	)	$	2,312		$	1,197		$	9,586		$	(55	)

Other Financial Data:
Net income (loss)	$	(5,906	)	$	2,076		$	1,540		$	(1,734	)	$	(972	)	$	2,312		$	1,197		$	9,586		$	(55	)
Interest and other expense (income), net		12			14			(16	)		5			51			23			40			39			27
Income tax provision (benefit)		435			(153	)		(174	)		174			(103	)		246			127			(6,268	)		280
Depreciation and amortization		888			866			879			876			1,002			1,056			1,206			1,298			1,244
Stock-based compensation		318			292			305			393			266			189			193			296			332
Loss from legal settlements		5,359			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			200

Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA⁽²⁾	$	1,106		$	3,095		$	2,534		$	(286	)	$	244		$	3,826		$	2,763		$	4,951		$	2,028

We have experienced, and expect that we will continue to experience, seasonality in the number of orders placed. Customers tend to place a higher number of orders in the first quarter of the year as we believe the demand for forming businesses is the highest at the beginning of the year. Further seasonality is reflected in the timing of our revenue recognition in the second quarter, as we typically recognize in the second quarter a high amount of revenues from orders placed in the first quarter that are fulfilled in the second quarter. Also, we generally see demand for our services decline around the beginning of the third quarter with summer vacations and in the last two months of the fourth quarter around the winter holidays. We expect this seasonality to continue into the future, which may cause period to period fluctuations in certain of our operating results and financial metrics and thus limit our ability to predict our future results. At the end of each of our last nine fiscal quarters, bundled free trial subscribers constituted less than 20% of the total number of subscribers and in six of those quarters bundled free trial subscribers constituted 10% or less of the total number of subscribers. As the size of our subscription business grows as a percentage of our total revenues, we expect that the number of bundled free trial subscribers as a percentage of the total number of subscribers will generally decline, with potential seasonal increases in the first quarter of each year related to the seasonality of our transactional service business.

Cost of services follow similar seasonal patterns of orders placed and revenues recognized, with higher levels of spending for customer care during periods in which our revenues are higher. Costs of services, including government filing fees, printing and shipping, credit and debit card fees and sales and use taxes, tend to be variable costs and are generally aligned with the number of orders placed. We use temporary personnel and outsourced independent contractors to provide flexibility in hiring and to manage costs. The fourth quarter cost of services as a percent of revenue tends to increase slightly over the third quarter due to increased full-time and temporary customer care and fulfillment personnel hired 45 to 60 days prior to the anticipated seasonally higher volumes in the first quarter in order to allow for appropriate training and development of such personnel. We expect the trend of hiring new customer care representatives and fulfillment personnel 45 to 60 days before the calendar year-end to continue.

Media spend is generally at its highest in the first quarter and in line with the seasonal first quarter increase in the number of orders placed. Media spend generally reaches its second highest level of spend in the third quarter. Fourth quarter media spend is generally the lowest for the year in line with our expectations of a lower number of orders placed at that time.

We also expect that the investments in our subscription legal plan business, customer acquisition and retention, and potential international expansion will reduce non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA in the next few quarters.

As of March 31, 2012, we had cash of $31.9 million, which consisted entirely of cash on deposit with banks. Other than $8.4 million of outside capital and cash provided by exercises of stock options, we have funded our operations and capital expenditures since inception from cash flows provided by operating activities.

We expect cash provided by operating activities to be our primary source of funds in future periods and to be driven by our anticipated growth in our transaction and subscription revenues, partially offset by increases in working capital requirements and capital expenditures associated with scaling our operations, technology and infrastructure to support our growth and cash payments made for legal settlements. We expect to make capital expenditures of approximately $5.0 million in 2012, approximately half of which would be for capitalized software expenditures and the other half of which would be for other capital expenditures associated with scaling our operations, technology and infrastructure to support our growth. Our future capital requirements may vary from those now planned and will depend on many factors, including:

Based on our current level of operations and anticipated growth, we believe that our existing cash, together with cash provided by operating activities and the proceeds from this offering, will be sufficient to fund our operations and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. We may supplement our liquidity needs with borrowings under our $10 million revolving line of credit facility, if available. See "—Line of Credit Facility."

Net cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2012 resulted primarily from a net decrease in our operating assets and liabilities of $4.1 million and our net loss of $0.1 million adjusted for non-cash expenses of $1.7 million. The net decrease in operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to an increase in deferred revenues, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities. Deferred revenues increased primarily as a result of the growth in the number of orders placed and mix of services, as well as the timing of the completion of those services. The increase in accounts payable was primarily due to timing of payments to our vendors, and the increase in accrued expenses and other current liabilities was primarily due to an increase in accrued advertising, accrued professional fees and an additional accrual for the legal settlements, offset by a decrease in accrued payroll and related expenses mainly due to the year-end accrued bonus payments made during the three months ended March 31, 2012. Non-cash expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2012 were comprised primarily of depreciation and amortization of property and equipment totaling $1.2 million, stock-based compensation of $0.3 million and deferred income taxes of $0.1 million.

Net cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2011 resulted primarily from a net decrease in our operating assets and liabilities of $3.4 million and our net loss of $1.0 million adjusted for non-cash expenses of $1.3 million. The net decrease in operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities. The increase in accounts payable was primarily due to the timing of payments to our vendors, and the increase in accrued expenses and other current liabilities was primarily due to an increase in accrued advertising and, payroll and related costs with increased headcount. Non-cash expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2011 were comprised primarily of depreciation and amortization of property and equipment totaling $1.0 million and stock-based compensation of $0.3 million.

Net cash provided by operating activities in 2011 resulted primarily from net income of $12.1 million and a net decrease in our operating assets and liabilities of $2.9 million, offset in part by non-cash items of $1.3 million. The net decrease in operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to an increase in accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $4.3 million primarily attributable to accrued incentive bonuses,

partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $1.4 million primarily attributable to our customers selecting the three-pay plan, which allows them to pay for an order in three equal payments. Non-cash items in 2011 included a $6.9 million income tax benefit on the release of the valuation allowance related to our deferred tax assets, offset in part by non-cash expenses, including depreciation, amortization and disposals totaling $4.7 million and stock-based compensation of approximately $1.0 million.

Net cash provided by operating activities in 2010 resulted from our net loss of $4.0 million adjusted for non-cash expenses of $5.2 million and a net decrease in our operating assets and liabilities of $0.3 million. Our net loss and the net decrease in operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to the accrual of $5.4 million for the legal settlements described in "—Critical Accounting Policies—Loss Contingencies" and Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Non-cash expenses in 2010 were comprised primarily of depreciation, amortization and a loss on disposal of property and equipment totaling $3.8 million and stock-based compensation of $1.3 million.

Net cash provided by operating activities in 2009 resulted from a net decrease in our operating assets and liabilities of $11.2 million and our net loss of $0.6 million, adjusted for non-cash expenses of $4.1 million. The net decrease in operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to an increase in deferred revenues and accrued expenses and other current liabilities. Deferred revenues increased primarily as a result of the growth in the number of orders placed and mix of services, as well as the timing of the completion of those services. The increase in accrued expenses and other current liabilities was primarily due to an increase in payroll and related costs with increased headcount and related compensation. Non-cash expenses in 2009 were comprised primarily of depreciation, amortization and loss on disposal of property and equipment totaling $3.0 million and stock-based compensation of $1.1 million.

Net cash used in investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 primarily resulted from continued investment in internally developed capitalized software and the purchase of property and equipment. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, restricted cash decreased as a financial institution removed the requirement to maintain collateral against the available credit limit on procurement credit cards.

Net cash used in investing activities in 2011 primarily resulted from continued investment in internally developed capitalized software and the purchase of property and equipment, including approximately $2.5 million for data center server and computer equipment upgrades to support our operations and online legal platform, offset in part by a decrease in restricted cash held by a financial institution for banking and credit card merchant services.

Net cash used in investing activities in 2010 primarily resulted from the continued investment in internally developed capitalized software and the purchase of property and equipment to build out our facilities in Glendale, California and Austin, Texas, offset in part by proceeds received for disposal of property and equipment.

Net cash used in investing activities in 2009 primarily resulted from the purchase of property and equipment and investment in internally developed capitalized software associated with the development of a new order management system together with an increase in restricted cash held by a financial institution for banking and credit card merchant services.

Net cash provided by financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 resulted from proceeds from exercises of stock options, partially offset by the payment of capital lease obligations.

Net cash provided by financing activities in 2011 resulted primarily from the payment of capital lease obligations, largely offset by proceeds from exercises of stock options and excess windfall tax benefits related to stock-based compensation.

Net cash provided by financing activities in 2010 resulted primarily from proceeds from exercises of stock options and repayment of notes receivable from stockholders.

Net cash provided by financing activities in 2009 primarily resulted from proceeds from exercises of stock options.

On October 31, 2008, we entered into a revolving line of credit facility with Comerica Bank, which was amended on October 29, 2010 that allows us to borrow up to $10 million for up to 180 days from the date of borrowing. We are obligated to pay an unused line fee equal to 0.20% per annum of the average unused portion of the line of credit, payable in quarterly installments on the last day of each quarter. Borrowings under the under the line of credit bear interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or prime rate, which we can select at the time of borrowing, plus an applicable margin, and are collateralized by substantially all of our assets. The line of credit expires on October 31, 2012 and limits our ability to declare and pay dividends and to incur additional credit obligations or indebtedness. The line of credit requires immediate repayment of amounts outstanding upon an event of default, as defined in the agreement, which includes events such as a payment default, a covenant detail or the occurrence of a material adverse change. At December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012, we had no amounts outstanding or any letters of credit backed by the line of credit.

The following table sets forth our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2011:

Operating lease commitments primarily relate to minimum lease payments under the operating leases we entered into for facility space in Glendale, California, Austin, Texas and San Francisco, California. Purchase commitments relate primarily to minimum purchase commitments for advertising and media. As of December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012, we did not have any debt. We believe our current cash and cash equivalents, as well as cash expected to be generated by future operating activities, will be sufficient to meet our contractual obligations for the next twelve months.

We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities that would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in those types of relationships. We enter into guarantees in the ordinary course of business related to the guarantee of our own performance and the performance of our subsidiaries.

In 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued new accounting guidance that amends some fair value measurement principles and disclosure requirements. The new guidance states that the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise are only relevant when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets and prohibits the grouping of financial instruments for purposes of determining their fair values when the unit of account is specified in other guidance. The adoption of this accounting guidance during the three months ended March 31, 2012 did not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In 2011, the FASB issued new disclosure guidance related to the presentation of the Statement of Comprehensive Income. This guidance eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the consolidated statement of stockholders' equity. The requirement to present reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the face of the consolidated statement of income has been deferred. The adoption of this accounting guidance during the three months ended March 31, 2012 did not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.

As an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act, we have elected to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards pursuant to Section 107(b) of the Act. This election is irrevocable.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in our consolidated financial statements and related notes. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have identified below our critical accounting policies and estimates that we believe require the greatest amount of judgment. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates that are subject to significant judgment including those related to sales allowances and credit reserves, the evaluation of revenue recognition criteria, including the determination of standalone value and estimates of the selling price of deliverables in our revenue arrangements, loss contingencies, valuation allowances and reserves related to income taxes and assumptions underlying stock-based compensation. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates compared to historical experience and trends, which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities. To the extent that there are material differences between our estimates and our actual results, our future financial statement presentation, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows will be affected.

We believe the assumptions and estimates associated with the following have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements.

We recognize revenues when four basic criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; services have been rendered; the fees are fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. We consider persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement to be the customer's placement of the order and acceptance of our terms of service. For arrangements with third-party companies related to other revenues, we ensure a written contract is in place. Our customers generally pay for their orders and subscription services in advance by credit or debit card. The total fees, or the consideration, collected by us for our services include, as applicable, expedited services fees, government filing fees and shipping fees. We record the total consideration initially as deferred revenues that are then recognized as revenues when we meet all of the criteria for revenue recognition. Deferred revenues that we will recognize during the succeeding 12 month period from our balance sheet date is recorded as current deferred revenues, and the remaining portion is recorded as non-current at the balance sheet date. In circumstances where we do not receive the

payment in advance, revenues are only recognized if collectability is reasonably assured, assuming we meet all other revenue recognition criteria.

For our legal document preparation services, transaction revenues are recognized when we fulfill the service. For time-based, subscription services, such as legal plans, registered agent services or unlimited access to our forms library, we recognize subscription revenues ratably on a straight-line basis over the subscription term for those services, which ranges from a period of 30 days to two years.

We record transaction revenues net of refunds, cancellations, promotional discounts, sales allowances, credit reserves and the value allocated to bundled free-trials for our subscription services. We record subscription revenues net of promotional discounts, cancellations, sales allowances, credit reserves and payments to legal plan attorneys.

Other revenues are recognized when the related performance based criteria have been met. We assesses whether performance criteria have been met on a cost-per-click or cost-per-action basis and whether the fees are fixed or determinable based on a reconciliation of the performance criteria and the payment terms associated with the transaction. The reconciliation of the performance criteria generally includes a comparison of internally tracked performance data to the contractual performance obligation and, when available, to third-party or affiliate provided performance data. These arrangements do not include multiple deliverables.

A significant number of our arrangements include multiple, bundled deliverables, such as the preparation of legal documents combined with related document revision, document storage, 30-day free trial of our registered agent services or our legal plans. We therefore recognize revenues for these arrangements in accordance with FASB ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition—Multiple-Element Arrangements ("ASC 605-25"). ASC 605-25 was updated by Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605)—Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements—a Consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force ("ASU 2009-13").

We elected to early adopt ASU 2009-13 on a prospective basis for all arrangements entered into or materially modified after January 1, 2010.

For multiple deliverable revenue arrangements, we first assesses whether each deliverable has value to our customer on a standalone basis and performance is considered probable and substantially in our control. Our services can be sold both on a standalone basis and as part of multiple deliverable arrangements. Accordingly, substantially all of our services have standalone value to our customer. Based on that standalone value of the deliverables, we allocate our revenues among the separate deliverables in the arrangement, including the bundled free-trials, using the relative selling price method hierarchy established in ASU 2009-13. This hierarchy requires the selling price of each deliverable in a multiple deliverable revenue arrangement to be based on, in descending order: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence, or VSOE, (ii) third-party evidence of selling price, or TPE, or (iii) management's best estimated selling price, or BESP.

We establish VSOE for a majority of our services based on the price we charge when the deliverable is sold separately. In determining VSOE, we require that a substantial majority of our selling prices for our services to fall within a reasonably narrow pricing range, and we then establish VSOE based on the mid-point of the range for those services. This requires significant management judgment, including as to how we group similar services, the time period analyzed for assessing transactions, and the volume of similar transactions available to us in the relevant time period.

When we cannot establish VSOE, we apply our judgment with respect to whether we can obtain TPE based on competitor prices for similar deliverables that are sold separately. We believe our strategy differs from that of our peers, and our services contain a significant level of differentiation such that comparable pricing of our services cannot be obtained. Our competitors do not sell services similar to ours on a standalone basis, and we therefore are unable to reliably determine what similar competitor services'

selling prices are on a stand-alone basis. As a result, we have been unable to establish selling price based on TPE.

When we cannot establish VSOE or TPE, we apply our judgment to determine BESP. The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale if the service were sold on a stand-alone basis. The determination of BESP requires us to make significant estimates and judgments and we consider numerous factors in this determination, including the nature of the deliverables, market conditions and our competitive landscape, internal costs and our pricing and discounting practices. Our determination of BESP is made through consultation with and formal approval by our senior management. We update our estimates of both VSOE and BESP on an ongoing basis as events and as circumstances may require. Because we can establish VSOE for substantially all of our services, use of BESP estimate for revenue recognition is limited to document revisions and document storage services.

We are unable to determine VSOE or TPE for document revision and document storage services, which we bundle with certain of our consumer services. Accordingly, as of January 1, 2010, the selling prices of these document revision and document storage services are determined based on BESP, and we recognize revenues from these services based on the relative selling price of the deliverables in the arrangement. Our adoption of ASU 2009-13 resulted in us recognizing $4.7 million of transaction revenues in 2010 that we would not have otherwise recognized during that year.

Prior to January 1, 2010, we considered document revision and document storage services that we bundle with other consumer services to be a single unit of accounting and the total fees received from those arrangements were recognized as transaction revenues ratably on a straight-line basis over the service term. Prior to August 2009, we offered document revision and document storage services with a term of five years and, accordingly, the deferred revenues will be recognized as transaction revenues through August 2014. Beginning in August 2009, we sold these services only on a one year service term. At December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012, our non-current deferred revenues balances of $7.0 million, $3.3 million and $2.4 million, respectively, included in our consolidated balance sheets primarily consist of document revision and document storage services.

Our revenue arrangements do not include contractual provisions for cancellations or terminations. However, as a business practice we provide a satisfaction guarantee that if our customer is not fully satisfied with the services or support and they notify us within a limited period of time after the purchase, we will attempt to resolve the matter, offer a credit that can be used for future services or provide a refund, excluding third-party fees. Revenues are recognized net of promotional discounts and estimated sales allowances and credit reserves related to credit or debit card chargebacks, sales credits and refunds. For completed services where the customers have elected the three-pay plan, we record a sales allowance for estimated charge backs, credits and collection losses for the second and third payment receivable amounts. The sales allowance is recorded against the customers' receivable balance. For completed and paid services, we record a sales and credit reserve based on our estimate of refunds, charge backs or credits. The sales and credit reserves are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities. The sales allowance and the sales and credit reserves are made at the time of revenue recognition based on our historical experience, activity occurring after the balance sheet date and other factors. We have established a sufficient history of estimating refunds, charge backs, write offs and credits given the large number of our homogeneous transactions and the majority of the our allowances and reserves are known within the time period of our financial reporting cycle. The estimated provision for sales allowances and reserves has varied from actual results within ranges consistent with our expectations. If actual sales allowances, credit reserves and promotional discounts are greater than estimated by us, revenues and operating results would be negatively impacted.

We evaluate the criteria as prescribed by FASB ASC 605-45, Principal Agent Considerations, in order to determine whether we can recognize revenues gross as a principal or net as an agent. We record revenues on a gross basis when we are the primary obligor in the arrangement and therefore principally responsible for the fulfillment of the services. We are the primary obligor in substantially all of our legal document preparation and registered agent services. The determination of whether we are the principal or agent requires us to evaluate a number of indicators including which party, as applicable, in the arrangement:

When forming our conclusion on whether we are the principal or agent in an arrangement and whether to present revenues gross or net, we weight the above factors, and places more weight on the first factor, or primary obligor, followed by whether we have latitude in establishing the sales price and whether we perform part of the service.

In arrangements in which we are the primary obligor and the indicators are weighted towards us acting as a principal, we record as revenues the amounts we have billed to our customer, and we record the related costs we have incurred in fulfilling our services. We are the primary obligor in substantially all of our legal document preparation and registered agent services.

In arrangements in which we are not the primary obligor and the indicators are more weighted towards us acting as the agent in the arrangement, we record revenues on a net basis, which is equal to the amount billed to our customer, net of the fee payable to the primary obligor, which is another third party that is primarily responsible for performing the services for the customer. Because we are not a law firm and cannot provide legal advice, the participating independent law firms in our legal plans have the primary service obligation to provide attorney consultations to our customers, for which we pay the law firms a monthly fee. Therefore, we recognize revenues net as an agent for subscriptions to our legal plans. We also recognized revenues net as an agent for registered agent services in 43 states prior to March 2010. Before March 2010, we contracted with third-party service providers to perform substantially all registered agent services on our behalf and accordingly, we recorded the amount received from the customer net of the fee payable to the service provider.

We record loss contingencies in our consolidated financial statements in the period when they are probable and reasonably estimable. If the amount is probable and we are able to reasonably estimate a range of loss, we accrue the amount that is the best estimate within that range, and if no amount is better than any other in the range, we record the amount at the low end in the range. We disclose those contingencies that we believe are at least reasonably possible but not probable regardless of whether they are reasonably estimable. We currently do not have any loss contingencies that are probable but not estimable. The likelihood of our contingencies is determined using a number of factors including nature of the matter, advice of our internal and external counsel, previous experience and historical and relevant information available to us. As discussed in Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, we have agreed to settlements with respect to two matters with the maximum settlement, assuming all eligible claimants made a valid claim, estimated to be $16 million. As of

December 31, 2011, we had reasonably estimated the collective range of aggregate probable losses for these matters to be between $5.4 million and $7 million and, in accordance with GAAP, had accrued $5.4 million, the low end of the range. The determination of the probability of loss and the range of loss requires significant judgment.

Based on the claims received through May 14 and 15, 2012, the claims submission deadlines for these two matters, and claims processed to date, we have reasonably estimated the collective aggregate probable loss to be approximately $5.6 million, resulting in additional $0.2 million included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities as of March 31, 2012.

The ultimate cost of these two pending settlements are dependent on a number of factors, including the resolution of any appeals of the approved settlements, and actual claims made by, and the resulting payments to, the class members. There is at least a reasonable possibility that we may incur an additional loss in excess of the amount accrued at March 31, 2012. We are unable to estimate the amount of additional loss or range of additional loss, if any, relating to these matters. If the actual payments for the settlements are higher than the amount estimated by us, this difference could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition. We will recognize any difference between the amount accrued and the ultimate cost of the settlements as an additional expense or reversal of amount already accrued in the period in which the final settlement is approved and the claims made by the plaintiffs are finalized.

As discussed in Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, we are subject to additional pending matters for which we believe that we have meritorious defenses to the claims and intend to defend against vigorously. The plaintiffs have yet to state any dollar amounts being sought associated with these matters and we have denied and continue to deny all of the allegations and claims asserted in the lawsuits. Accordingly, we are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these matters and have not recorded any losses in our consolidated financial statements as the amount of losses, if any, associated with these matters are not probable and estimable. If these matters are not resolved in our favor, the potential losses arising from results of litigation or settlements may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition.

We use the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the liability method, we determine our deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between our financial reporting and tax bases of our assets and liabilities, and measure them using enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect based on when we expect these differences to reverse. We must also make judgments in evaluating whether deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. To the extent that we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance. The carrying value of our net deferred tax assets is based on whether it is more likely than not that we will generate sufficient future taxable income to realize these deferred tax assets. We record a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some or all of our net deferred tax assets will not be realized. Our judgments regarding future taxable income may change over time due to changes in market conditions, changes in tax laws, tax planning strategies or other factors. If our assumptions and consequently our estimates change in the future, our valuation allowance established may be increased or decreased, resulting in a material respective increase or decrease in income tax provision (benefit) and related impact on our reported net income (loss).

In determining the need for a valuation allowance, we review all available evidence pursuant to the requirements of ASC 740, Income Taxes. The determination of recording or releasing tax valuation allowances is made, in part, pursuant to an assessment performed by us regarding the likelihood that we will generate sufficient future taxable income against which benefits of the deferred tax assets may or may not be realized. This assessment requires us to exercise significant judgment and make estimates with respect to our ability to generate revenues, operating income and taxable income in future periods.

Amongst other factors, we must make assumptions regarding overall current and projected business and legal document and ancillary services' industry conditions, operating efficiencies, our ability to timely and effectively adapt to technological change, fully and successfully resolve outstanding legal matters, and the competitive environment which may impact our ability to generate taxable income and, in turn, realize the value of the deferred tax assets. Significant cumulative operating losses in 2010 and prior years and economic uncertainties in the market made our ability to project future taxable income uncertain and volatile at December 31, 2010. Based upon our assessment of all available evidence, including our history of cumulative losses, we concluded as of December 31, 2010, that it was not more likely than not that our net deferred tax assets would be realized, and therefore we had a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.

In 2011, we became profitable due to the significant increase in our revenues as we experienced an increase in demand for our services. As a result, we were able to utilize a substantial amount of our federal net operating loss carryforwards. The majority of our year ended December 31, 2011 income from operations was earned in the second half of the year resulting in our achievement of three-year cumulative income before income taxes by the fourth quarter of 2011. Accordingly, during the fourth quarter of 2011, we released our valuation allowance against deferred tax assets based on the weight of positive evidence that existed at December 31, 2011, except for the allowance of $0.4 million relating to our deferred tax asset for a capital loss carryforward which we expected to expire unused. Based upon the current trend of our operating results and forecasts, we believe that it is more likely than not that we will recognize the benefits of our deferred tax assets.

We adopted the provisions of FASBs guidance on Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes on January 1, 2007. This guidance clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for the accounting of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We consider many factors when evaluating and estimating our tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately forecast actual outcomes. We recognize interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense (benefit) in the accompanying statements of operations. We do not have significant uncertain tax positions.

We recognize compensation expense related to our employee option grants in accordance with FASB ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation ("ASC 718"). We estimate the fair value of employee share-based payment awards on the grant-date. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model for estimating the fair value of our options granted under our stock option plans. We have elected to treat share-based payment awards with graded vesting schedules and time-based service conditions as a single award and recognize stock-based compensation on a straight-line basis, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period. As our stock-based compensation expense recognized is based on our awards that are ultimately expected to vest, the amount has been reduced by our estimated forfeitures. ASC 718 requires us to estimate forfeitures at the time of the grant and revise, if necessary, in subsequent periods if our actual forfeitures differ from our estimates. We estimated forfeitures based on our historical experience and future expectations.

We recognize compensation expense for non-employee stock-based awards in accordance with ASC 718 and FASB ASC 505-50, Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees ("ASC 505-50"). We account for stock option awards issued to non-employees at fair value using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We believe that the fair value of the stock options is more reliably measured than the fair value of services received and record compensation expense based on the then-current fair values of the stock options at each financial reporting date. We adjust compensation recorded during the service period in subsequent periods for changes in the stock options' fair value until the earlier of the date at which the non-employee's

performance is complete or a performance commitment is reached, which is generally when the stock option award vests.

The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires us to make certain assumptions, including the fair value of our underlying common stock, the expected term, the expected volatility, the risk-free interest rate and the dividend yield.

The assumptions that we used to calculate the grant date fair value of our employee and non-employee stock option grants for the periods indicated:

We have regularly conducted contemporaneous valuations to assist us in the determination of the fair value of our common stock for each stock option grant. The fair value per common share underlying our stock option grants was determined by our board of directors with input from management at each grant date. The valuation of our common stock was performed in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Practice Aid, Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation. The assumptions we use in the valuation model are based on future expectations combined with management judgement. In the absence of a public trading market for our common stock, our board of directors with input from management reviewed and discussed a variety of objective and subjective factors when exercising its judgment in determining the deemed fair value of our common stock. These factors generally include the following:

We utilize the probability-weighted expected return model, or PWERM, to allocate value to our common shares. The PWERM determines the fair value of our common stock depending on the likelihood of various liquidy scenarios. We then determine the appropriate allocation of value to the common stockholders under each liquidity scenario based on the rights and preferences of our Series A and common stock at that time. The resulting value of common stock under each scenario is multiplied by a present value factor, calculated based on our cost of equity and the expected timing of the event. The value of common stock is then multiplied by an estimated probability for each of the expected events determined by our management. We then calculate the probability-weighted value per share of common stock and apply a lack of marketability discount.

Under the PWERM, the value of our common stock is based upon four possible future events for our company: initial public offering, sale, staying private and dissolution. We use the market approach for determining the fair value of our common stock under the IPO, sale and staying private scenarios. The market approach measures the value of a business through an analysis of similar publicly-traded entities. In applying the market approach, valuation multiples are determined for selected comparable companies and are then evaluated based on the strengths and weaknesses of our company relative to the comparable entities. We then apply these market multiples to our operating data to arrive at a value indication. Under the dissolution scenario, we assumed no value remained to be allocated to our common shareholders.

We also utilize the income approach to test the reasonableness of the results of the application of the PWERM. The income approach estimates value based on the expectation of future net cash flows that

were then discounted back to the present using a rate of return available from alternative companies of similar type and risk.

We determine the exercise price of our option grants based on the fair value of our common stock as of the immediately preceding valuation, unless circumstances warrant obtaining a more current valuation, including any material changes in our business or events, size of the award and the proximity of the grant to the preceding valuation. The following table summarizes options we granted in 2011 and the first quarter of 2012 based on the immediately preceding valuation:

Based upon an assumed initial public offering price of $11.00 per share, which is the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus, the aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding stock options as of March 31, 2012 was $40.0 million, of which $27.3 million related to vested options and $12.7 million related to unvested options.

The most significant factors considered by our board of directors in determining the fair value of our common stock each quarter were as follows:

Our board of directors determined the fair value of our common stock was $8.21 per share as of June 30, 2011. Our board of directors took into consideration the February 2011 purchases by third parties of our common stock from our existing stockholders at an imputed purchase price of $7.46 per share. We obtained a contemporaneous third-party valuation that used PWERM to assist our board of directors in determining the fair value of our common stock. Our board of directors also considered events and changes from the previous valuation, including our business growth, and positive outlook and favorable market conditions, including various other Internet companies recently completing initial public offerings. Significant estimates and assumptions were as follows:

Our board of directors determined the fair value of our common stock was $8.22 per share as of September 30, 2011. We obtained a contemporaneous third-party valuation that used PWERM to assist our board of directors in determining the fair value of our common stock. Our board of directors also considered other factors including our growth in revenues and profitability, as well as the volatile condition of the financial markets as a result of global financial uncertainties and a weakening in the environment for initial public offerings. Significant estimates and assumptions were as follows:

Our board of directors determined the fair value of our common stock was $8.61 per share as of December 31, 2011, resulting in an increase of $0.39 per share or an increase of 5% over the September 2011 valuation. We obtained a contemporaneous third-party valuation that used PWERM to assist our board of directors in determining the fair value of our common stock. Our board of directors also considered other factors including our business growth and stronger than forecasted fourth quarter results, positive outlook and improved financial market conditions in general. Significant estimates and assumptions were as follows:

Our board of directors determined the fair value of our common stock was $10.59 per share as of February 29, 2012, resulting in an increase of $1.98 per share or an increase of 23% over the December 2011 valuation. We obtained a contemporaneous third-party valuation that used PWERM to assist our board of directors in determining the fair value of our common stock. Our board of directors also considered other factors including:

Our cash is comprised entirely of cash on deposit with banks. We do not have any long-term borrowings. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing income without significantly increasing risk. Because our cash is entirely in bank deposits, our portfolio's fair value is insensitive to interest rate changes. We determined that the increase in yield from potentially investing our cash in longer-term investments did not warrant a change in our investment strategy. In future periods, we will continue to evaluate our investment policy in order to ensure that we continue to meet our overall objectives.

Our sales transactions to date have been primarily denominated in U.S. dollars and therefore substantially all of our revenues are not subject to foreign currency risk.

We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. If our costs were to become subject to significant inflationary pressures, we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through price increases. Our inability or failure to do so could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have served approximately two million customers over the last 10 years. In 2011, nine out of ten of the approximately 34,000 customers who responded to a survey we provided said they would recommend LegalZoom to their friends and family. Customers that completed orders for certain of our services are invited to take an email survey. Our customers placed approximately 490,000 orders and more than 20 percent of new California limited liability companies were formed using our online legal platform in 2011. We believe the volume of transactions processed through our online legal platform creates a scale advantage that deepens our knowledge and enables us to improve the quality and depth of the services we provide to our customers.

The law provides numerous benefits and protections to businesses and consumers. Businesses use patents and trademarks to protect their intellectual property and help them achieve the full potential of their ideas and innovations. Entrepreneurs incorporate their businesses to shield personal assets, limit liabilities and help raise capital. Consumers use wills, trusts and other estate planning tools to ensure their assets are distributed according to their wishes, to minimize tax liabilities and to avoid or limit probate process and expenses. The law also provides a framework for resolving disputes and navigating life's challenges, including bankruptcy and divorce.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2009, there were approximately 26 million small businesses with fewer than ten employees. We estimate that in 2010, approximately two million new businesses were formed in the United States. According to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, legal services in the United States in 2010 represented a $266 billion market. We estimate that in 2011 approximately $97 billion of legal services were provided to small businesses and consumers, based on a study conducted on our behalf by L.E.K. Consulting LLC.

Despite the enormous amount spent on legal services, we believe that small businesses and consumers have not been adequately served by the options traditionally available to them. Every year, small

Making the right choices with respect to legal matters can be difficult, especially for those with limited time and resources. The U.S. legal system consists of overlapping jurisdictions at the city, county, state and federal levels, each of which has its own evolving laws and regulations. Businesses may be subject to additional laws, regulations and legal issues applying specifically to the industries in which they operate. In addition, the policies and procedures associated with the creation, filing and certification of legal documents are often arcane and confusing.

When in need of legal help, small businesses and consumers lack an efficient and reliable way to find high quality, trustworthy attorneys with the appropriate experience to navigate this complex legal system and handle their specific needs. Small businesses and consumers often do not understand their legal needs or know where to start looking for an attorney. Some are wary of attorneys in general, and others may have heard from friends or family about negative experiences with attorneys or the legal system.

The high and unpredictable cost of traditional legal services also presents challenges for many small businesses and consumers. In 2011, the average billing rate for small and midsize law firms was $318 per hour, according to ALM's 2012 Survey of Billing and Practices for Small and Midsize Law Firms. Attorneys are frequently unable to predict the time required to address a client's legal matter, sometimes billing thousands of dollars to research a legal issue they have not previously encountered. This can be particularly true of generalist attorneys that offer many disparate legal services to members of their local communities. Unlike attorneys at large global law firms or specialty boutiques who handle high volumes of similar matters and develop expertise in specific domains, generalists can find it difficult to efficiently address a client's particular legal issue due to their lack of specialized expertise. Due to the high and unpredictable costs of traditional legal services, many small businesses and consumers limit their use of attorneys and instead often attempt to resolve legal issues without assistance.

As a result of these factors, many small businesses and consumers often are unsure of or dissatisfied with the legal services available to them, and many either elect not to seek help or take no action to address their important legal needs.

The use of technology and the Internet to address the inefficiencies in the small business and consumer legal services market has been limited to date. Available online services include distribution of standardized legal forms that are generally incapable of meeting the specific needs of a particular small business or consumer. Many legal form distributors do not provide tools for customers to make informed decisions or connect with experienced attorneys. While many solo attorneys and small law firms maintain their own websites, and other websites aggregate attorney listings or feature attorney advertisements, these attorney and firm websites, online directories, and online advertisements generally do little to assure that small businesses and consumers receive the quality, customer care and value they deserve.

the benefits and protection of the law more accessible to small businesses and consumers. We are taking advantage of this opportunity by providing the following benefits to our customers:

Through our online legal platform, we offer a variety of services to meet the specific needs of small businesses and consumers. We have built our services seeking to be each customer's legal partner for life.

We offer a broad portfolio of interactive legal documents that our customers can tailor to their specific needs through our dynamic online processes and scalable technology. Our interactive legal documents are designed for use, as appropriate, at the federal level as well as in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and approximately 2,900 U.S. counties. Our interactive legal documents are created by our customers via an easy three-step process. First, our customers complete an online questionnaire that uses conditional, rules-based logic to personalize questions based on earlier responses. Customer responses to the questionnaires often prompt our systems to automatically offer additional complementary services to our customers, such as Employer Identification Number obtainment and registered agent services for our small business customers. Second, we check customer responses for spelling, grammar and completeness. After our review is completed, our proprietary LegalZip software generates a final document tailored, as applicable, to the appropriate federal, state, or local jurisdiction. Last, we complete the services by printing and shipping the final document and further instructions to our customer. If applicable, we also handle any filing of the customer's completed documents with the appropriate government agency. Our system automatically notifies customers of the status of their order as the documents progress through the workflow cycle, including confirmation of filing with government agencies.

For small businesses and consumers who want legal advice, we offer legal plans that connect subscribers with experienced attorneys licensed in their jurisdiction to address their specific legal needs. Most of the attorneys who participate in our legal plan network practice at small law firms. We pay the participating independent law firms in our legal plan network a monthly fee per paid customer subscription to provide up to 30 minutes of free attorney consultations on new legal matters to our customers, and we do not receive or share in any fees from the law firms. We typically enter into one-year contractual agreements with law firms participating in our legal plan network, with the option to renew for successive one-year periods. In order to be considered for participation in our legal plan network, independent attorneys must satisfy certain quality standards established by us and be highly focused on customer care. We regularly assess our customers' satisfaction with the attorneys who participate in our legal plan network and remove attorneys that fail to satisfy our customers. Our small business and consumer subscription legal plans are currently available in 40 states and the District of Columbia.

Our small business legal plans are currently priced at $29.99 per month and our consumer legal plans are currently priced at $14.99 per month.

Business entities are often required by state law to appoint and maintain a registered agent in their state of formation to receive service of process and official government communications. For our business formation customers, we offer subscriptions currently priced at $159 per year.

We offer other services to our customers, including unlimited access to our forms library, electronic storage of applicable LegalZoom documents and document revisions. We also introduce our customers to relevant services and products through our relationships with leading credit card companies, commercial banks and other companies serving our customer base.

We have developed technology that enables us to efficiently process thousands of daily orders, as well as facilitate interactions between our customers and the attorneys who participate in our legal plan network.

We devote a substantial portion of our resources to developing new technologies and features and improving our technologies. As of March 31, 2012, we employed approximately 64 engineers, developers, project managers and support technicians who focus on the design and development of new features and products, as well as the development and maintenance of our websites, network infrastructure and internal operations systems. Additionally, we engage with third parties for additional development support as needed.

Customer care is central to our culture and we are highly focused on providing exceptional customer experiences. All of our employees are trained to focus on our customers and deliver quality customer service. Our customers have access to live customer care representatives and subscribers to legal plans may consult an experienced attorney. As of March 31, 2012, we had 133 customer care representatives located in the United States and 65 attorneys who participate in our legal plan network. As part of our customer relationship management, our customer care representatives proactively contact our customers by phone and email to resolve any issues that may arise during the order fulfillment process as soon as possible in order to timely fulfill an order. Customer satisfaction is a key component of our value proposition. We offer our customers a satisfaction guarantee for our interactive legal document services. If a customer is

not completely satisfied with our services for any reason, we will attempt to correct the situation, or provide a refund or credit. We actively monitor our service levels, fulfillment speed and quality to maintain the highest level of customer care, including the NPS scores of our services and of attorneys who participate in our legal plan network.

We are making substantial investments in research and development to increase innovation and develop new services to meet our customers' legal needs. Our research and development efforts are focused on enhancing our existing services, accessing new markets and developing new services. In 2011, we opened a research and development center in San Francisco that has enhanced our ability to focus on developing new services. Our research and development team works closely with both our marketing and technology teams to evaluate and react to customer demand.

We face intense competition from law firms and solo attorneys, legal document providers (including online providers) and national legal plan providers. We expect such competition to continue to increase. In addition, the competitive landscape can shift rapidly as new companies enter markets in which we compete and existing companies broaden their offerings. This is particularly true for online services, where barriers to entry are lower.

Our primary competition comes from small law firms and solo attorneys. Many of our customers have in the past used law firms or solo attorneys to address their legal needs. Attorneys are generally able to provide direct legal advice that we cannot offer due to regulations regarding the unauthorized practice of law, and firms may develop a competing online legal service division. Our primary online competitors for our interactive legal documents services include BizFilings, RocketLawyer, and The Company Corporation. We compete in the registered agent services business primarily with CT Corporation and Corporation Services Company. Our primary competitors for our legal plans include Hyatt Legal Plans (a

MetLife company), ARAG and LegalShield. Hyatt Legal Plans and ARAG primarily focus their marketing to larger employer groups, while LegalShield primarily focuses its marketing to individuals.

We believe competitive factors for our services include ease of use, breadth of offerings, brand name recognition, reputation, price, quality and customer service. To attract customers, some online competitors are offering free or low-priced entry-level services that may affect our pricing strategy.

Our success depends on our proprietary technology. We protect this proprietary technology by relying on a variety of intellectual property mechanisms including copyright, trade secret and trademark laws, and restrictions on disclosure and other methods. For example, we frequently file applications for copyrights, trademarks and service marks in order to protect our intellectual property. As of March 31, 2012, we have registered 12 trademarks in the United States including LegalZoom, LegalZoom.com, LegalZip, CreatingWill.com and ProxiLaw, and 27 trademarks in 42 foreign countries. We have no issued patents or pending patent applications. We also license intellectual property from third parties, such as software used to support our technology and operations.

Our business and the services we provide subject us to complex and evolving U.S. and foreign laws and regulations regarding UPL, legal document processing and preparation, legal plans, privacy and other matters. We do not purport to be a law firm and we do not engage in the practice of law, whether authorized or not. We provide self-help at our customers' specific direction and general information on legal issues generally encountered. Licensed attorneys provide services to our customers through our legal plans, and we rely on third parties to provide certain of our other services.

Additionally, we are required to comply with laws and regulations related to privacy and the storing, use, processing, disclosure and protection of personal information and other customer data.

perceived failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, or if our services are considered to constitute UPL, could cause us to modify or discontinue some of our services or incur significant expenses.

In addition, any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with applicable laws and regulations may subject us to regulatory inquiries, claims, suits and prosecutions. We have been subject to, and currently are subject to, litigation and regulatory inquiries relating to UPL. We expect to continue to be subject to such litigation and regulatory inquiries, as well as potential investigations from other regulatory agencies as our business expands into new jurisdictions and we introduce new services.

As of March 31, 2012, we had 521 full-time and part-time employees and 122 temporary workers, all of whom are located in the United States. We do not currently have any collective bargaining agreements with our employees and we believe employee relations are generally good.

Our corporate headquarters and principal operations are located in Glendale, California, where we lease and occupy approximately 49,000 square feet. The term of our lease expires in 2021.

We also have additional facilities in Glendale, California, where we lease and occupy approximately 6,000 square feet, Austin, Texas, where we sublease and occupy approximately 59,000 square feet, and San Francisco, California, where we lease and occupy approximately 6,000 square feet. The terms of these leases expire in 2016, 2013 and 2016, respectively.

We believe that our facilities are adequate for our needs, and that additional space will be available to us on commercially reasonable terms for the foreseeable future.

On September 15, 2009 and May 27, 2010, class action lawsuits were filed against us in California state court alleging, primarily, that we failed to comply with the California Legal Document Assistant Act, engaged in unfair business practices and made misrepresentations in our business operations. The September 15, 2009 case was brought by Charles Drozdyk. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on February 14, 2011, principally replacing Drozdyk with a new plaintiff, Randall Whiting. The May 27, 2010 case was brought by Kathryn Webster, as executor of the Estate of Anthony Ferrantino. Between the cases, plaintiffs sought to have all contracts between LegalZoom and its customers for the prior four years declared void, a return of all revenues generated from these customers, punitive damages, penalties, and injunctive relief. While we have denied and continue to deny all of the allegations and claims asserted in these lawsuits, without admitting liability, and to avoid additional legal costs to defend these matters, we signed a settlement agreement of the May 27, 2010 action to resolve the claims in both cases. A fairness hearing was held on April 5, 2012. The court issued an Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Judgment on April 18, 2012. Objector Whiting has filed a notice of appeal of the court's denial of his motion to intervene. Objectors Johnson and Manbeck, Mings and Whiting have filed notices of appeal of the court's order and judgment, but Mings' appeal was subsequently dismissed. At March 31, 2012, we have accrued an estimated settlement liability of $2.9 million for this lawsuit as further described in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

On December 17, 2009, a statewide class action lawsuit was filed against us by Todd Janson in Missouri state court, alleging that we were engaged in the unauthorized practice of law and violated the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act. The complaint was amended on January 15, 2010 to add plaintiffs Gerald T. Ardrey, Chad M. Ferrell, and C & J Remodeling LLC. It sought damages of five years of fees charged to Missouri customers with the fees from the two years immediately preceding the complaint trebled and an injunction enjoining LegalZoom from continued operation in Missouri. We subsequently removed the case to federal court in Missouri. While we have denied and continue to deny all of the allegations and claims asserted in this lawsuit, without admitting liability, and to avoid additional legal

costs to defend the matter, we signed a settlement agreement to resolve the lawsuit. A fairness hearing was held on April 13, 2012. The court issued a Final Approval Order and Dismissal with Prejudice on April 30, 2012. At March 31, 2012, we have accrued an estimated settlement liability of $2.7 million for this lawsuit as further described in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

On June 10, 2011, a purported quo warranto action was filed in Alabama state court against us by DeKalb County Bar Association. The complaint generally alleges that LegalZoom engages in the unauthorized practice of law and requests injunctive relief, not damages. We have denied and continue to deny all of the allegations and claims asserted in this lawsuit.

On July 19, 2012, we prevailed on a motion to dismiss a purported statewide class action filed against us by Christopher Lowry in federal court in Ohio, alleging that we engage in the unauthorized practice of law and violated the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act. The complaint, filed on October 27, 2011, sought disgorgement of revenues, among other remedies. We denied and continue to deny all of the allegations and claims asserted in this lawsuit.

On January 25, 2012, a purported class action complaint was filed against us by Jonathan McIllwain in Arkansas state court, generally alleging that we engage in the unauthorized practice of law constituting violation of the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act and unjust enrichment. The complaint seeks a refund of all monies paid to us and punitive damages, among other remedies. We have denied and continue to deny all of the allegations and claims asserted in this lawsuit.

On February 17, 2012, a complaint was filed against us by T. Travis Medlock in South Carolina state court, generally alleging that we engage in the unauthorized practice of law. The complaint requests declaratory relief, injunctive relief and disgorgement of revenues, among other measures. We have denied and continue to deny all of the allegations and claims asserted in this lawsuit.

On September 30, 2011 we filed a complaint in Raleigh, North Carolina against the North Carolina State Bar. We brought this suit requesting a declaration that our self-help services are lawful and require the registration of our subscription legal plans. We cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

In addition to these lawsuits, from time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are not presently involved in any legal proceeding in which we expect the outcome, if determined adversely to us, to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

The following table provides information regarding our executive officers and directors as of the date of this prospectus:

Name	Age	Position(s)

John Suh	41	Chief Executive Officer and Director
Frank Monestere	43	President and Chief Operating Officer
Edward Hartman	41	Chief Strategy Officer
Fred Krupica	60	Chief Financial Officer
Sheila Tan	48	Chief Marketing Officer
Tracy Terrill	37	Chief Technology Officer
Chas Rampenthal	44	General Counsel and Secretary
Brian Liu(5)	44	Chairman
Daniel Cooperman(1)(3)(4)	61	Nominated Director
Susan Decker(2)(3)	49	Director
Kenneth McBride(1)(4)	44	Nominated Director
Alan Spoon(3)	61	Director
Jason Trevisan	37	Director
Nehemia (Hemi) Zucker(1)(2)	55	Director

John Suh has served as our Chief Executive Officer since February 2007 and as a member of our board of directors since February 2005. Prior to LegalZoom, Mr. Suh was Chief Executive Officer of StudioDirect, the Internet division of a global supply chain company, Li and Fung. Prior to StudioDirect, Mr. Suh co-founded and served as Chief Executive Officer of Castling Group, helping offline companies create their Internet divisions and launching category leaders such as jcrew.com and hifi.com. Mr. Suh received a B.A. in Organizational Behavior and Public Policy from Harvard College and received his M.B.A. with high distinction from Harvard Business School, graduating as a George F. Baker Scholar. Mr. Suh was selected to serve on our board of directors due to the perspective and experience he brings as our Chief Executive Officer and his extensive background in the Internet industry.

Frank Monestere has served as our Chief Operating Officer since September 2002 and as our President and Chief Operating Officer since January 2005. Before joining LegalZoom, Mr. Monestere was a management consultant from 2000 to 2002, and assisted clients in executing technology-focused business initiatives for clients such as Comcast and Time Warner Cable. Before that, he served in the U.S. Army as an Infantry Officer in the 82nd Airborne Division from 1991 to 1995 and as a Special Forces Officer from 1995 to 1998 with deployments to Bosnia and Sub-Saharan Africa. He also serves on the Board of Advisors of Special Forces Association, a non-profit organization. Mr. Monestere graduated with a B.S. in International Relations from the United States Military Academy at West Point and received his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School where he focused on operations strategy and management.

Edward Hartman is one of our co-founders and has served as Chief Strategy Officer since June 2000. Prior to LegalZoom, Mr. Hartman was the Chief Technology Officer at TROON, LTD, later acquired by

Xceed International. Mr. Hartman was a creator of two web-based applications, MajorFind and Megaphone. He sat on the board of the Project Management Institute (Los Angeles Chapter) and is a current board member of the Brent Shapiro Foundation. Mr. Hartman received a B.S. in Computer Science and a B.A. in Anthropology from Yale University and an M.B.A. from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Program for Executives in San Francisco, California, where he was designated a Palmer Scholar. He is a member of the California Bar.

Fred Krupica has served as our Chief Financial Officer since April 2008. Mr. Krupica has over 30 years of experience at several high-growth corporations, most recently as Chief Financial Officer of Altra Inc., a leading biofuels company from January 2006 through April 2008. Prior to Altra, Mr. Krupica was Chief Financial Officer of Fastclick, Inc., an Internet advertising technology company, where he led Fastclick's initial public offering and subsequent sale and merger to Valueclick Inc. Mr. Krupica's previous positions include serving as the Chief Financial Officer of WJ Communications, Chief Financial Officer of Magnetic Data Technologies, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of a private equity firm, and founder of a professional services firm. Mr. Krupica also served in various senior financial management positions at Atlantic Richfield, Pullman Inc. and PricewaterhouseCoopers. Mr. Krupica is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a B.S. in Accounting from the University of Illinois and an M.B.A. in Finance from UCLA's Anderson School of Management.

Sheila Tan has served as our Chief Marketing Officer since March 2012. Before joining LegalZoom, Ms. Tan held executive positions at Align Technology Inc. as Vice President, Marketing and Chief Marketing Officer from March 2009 to December 2011 and Vice President of Product Innovation and Marketing Strategy from September 2008 to March 2009. Prior to that, she was Vice President, Marketing for Moka5, Inc., a provider of virtual desktop technology, from August 2007 to July 2008. Ms. Tan served as Vice President Marketing of Presto Services Inc., a digital-delivery service that enables families and friends to stay in touch via e-mail, without the need for a computer or Internet connection, from June 2006 to August 2007. Prior to that, Ms. Tan was Senior Director of Marketing, Quicken.com and QuickBooks at Intuit from 2001 to 2004. From 1995 to 2000, Ms. Tan held marketing positions of increasing scope and responsibility at The Procter & Gamble Company and its subsidiaries. Ms. Tan received a B.S. in Business Management from California Polytechnic State University and an M.B.A. in Business Management from UCLA's Anderson School of Management.

Tracy Terrill joined LegalZoom in January 2007 and has served as our Chief Technology Officer since October 2008. From March 2005 to December 2006, Mr. Terrill was Director of Sales and Marketing (systems) for GE NBC Universal Home Entertainment. Previous positions included Sr. Director of Digital Business Development and Sr. Director of Research and Development for Universal Music Group. Earlier in his career, Mr. Terrill was a management consultant for Gartner Group. Terrill holds a B.S. in Business Administration from Sonoma State University and an M.B.A. from the University of Southern California.

Chas Rampenthal has served as our General Counsel since October 2003 and as our Corporate Secretary since February 2007. Before joining LegalZoom, Mr. Rampenthal was a partner at Belanger and Rampenthal, LLC from October 2002 to October 2003. Prior to that, Mr. Rampenthal was an associate at Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP of Boston, Massachusetts and the Los Angeles office of Thelen Reid & Priest LLP. Mr. Rampenthal also served as an officer and aviator in the United States Navy. Mr. Rampenthal received his B.S. in Economics and Math Studies from Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville and a J.D. from the University of Southern California.

Brian Liu, one of our co-founders, has served on our board of directors since July 1999, and as our Chairman from July 1999 to February 2005 and since February 2007. Mr. Liu was our Chief Executive Officer from July 1999 to February 2007. Prior to LegalZoom, Mr. Liu was a corporate attorney with the law firm of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP. In addition, Mr. Liu was formerly assistant Vice President—Legal

with investment adviser Oaktree Capital Management, LLC. Mr. Liu graduated from U.C. Berkeley, Phi Beta Kappa, and with honors, in Biochemistry. Mr. Liu received his J.D. from UCLA School of Law and is a member of the California Bar. Mr. Liu intends to resign his position as the Chairman of our board of directors immediately upon the completion of this offering but will remain as a member of our board of directors. Mr. Liu was selected to serve on our board of directors due to his experience as our prior Chief Executive Officer and his involvement with our formation, along with his knowledge of our business, management skills and performance as a board member.

Daniel Cooperman has agreed to serve on our board of directors effective immediately after this registration statement is declared effective by the SEC. From 2010 to the present, Mr. Cooperman has been Of Counsel with Bingham McCutchen LLP, a law firm. From 2007 to 2009, Mr. Cooperman was the Senior Vice-President, General Counsel & Secretary of Apple Inc. and, before that time, he was the Senior Vice-President, General Counsel & Secretary of Oracle Corporation from 1997 to 2007. Mr. Cooperman is currently a Lecturer in Law at Stanford Law School and is a Fellow at the Arthur and Toni Rembe Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford Law School and Graduate School of Business. He is also currently a strategic advisor to Institutional Venture Partners and several private technology companies. Mr. Cooperman earned his A.B. in Economics from Dartmouth College, his J.D. from Stanford Law School and his M.B.A. from Stanford Graduate School of Business. Mr. Cooperman was nominated to serve on our board of directors upon the completion of this offering due to his extensive knowledge and experience in the legal industry, his expertise in corporate leadership, governance and management practices and his experience with Internet and technology companies.

Susan Decker has served on our board of directors since October 2010. Ms. Decker also currently serves on the boards of directors of Intel Corporation, Berkshire Hathaway Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation and is a Trustee of Save the Children. Previously, Ms. Decker served on the board of directors of Stanford Institute of Economic Policy Research from March 2005 to May 2007. During the 2009-2010 school year, Ms. Decker served as Entrepreneur-in-Residence at Harvard Business School. Prior to that, from June 2000 to April 2009, Ms. Decker held various executive management positions at Yahoo! Inc., including serving as President from June 2007 to April 2009, Head of the Advertiser and Publisher Group from December 2006 to June 2007, and Chief Financial Officer from June 2000-June 2007. Before Yahoo!, Ms. Decker spent 14 years with Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, most recently as Managing Director, Global Equity Research from 1998 to 2000, and previously as an equity research analyst, covering publishing and advertising stocks from 1986 to 1998. In this capacity, Ms. Decker received recognition by Institutional Investor magazine as a top-rated analyst for ten consecutive years. Ms. Decker was selected to serve on our board of directors due to her extensive experience as president of a global Internet company, providing expertise in corporate leadership, financial management, and Internet technology, and to the extent Ms. Decker services as a director for other multinational companies, Ms. Decker also provides cross-board experience.

Kenneth McBride has agreed to serve on our board of directors effective immediately after this registration statement is declared effective by the SEC. Since 2001, Mr. McBride has been the Chief Executive Officer of Stamps.com, a Nasdaq-traded provider of Internet-based services for mailing or shipping letters, packages or parcels. Beginning in 1999, he has held various positions at Stamps.com, as President from 2001 until January 2012, as Chief Financial Officer from 2000 to 2004 and as Senior Director of Finance from 1999 to 2000. Mr. McBride is also Chairman of the board of directors of Stamps.com. He also serves on the Board of Trustees of The California Science Center Foundation, a non-profit organization. Prior to Stamps.com, Mr. McBride was a research analyst for Salomon Smith Barney covering several industries in the high technology area. Mr. McBride has also worked as an engineer and manager in the semiconductor industry. Mr. McBride holds a bachelor's degree, with honors, and a master's degree, in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University. Mr. McBride also holds an M.B.A. from the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University. Mr. McBride was selected to serve

on our board of directors due to his extensive experience in Internet and technology companies, corporate leadership and financial management.

Alan Spoon has served on our board of directors since February 2007. Mr. Spoon is a general partner with Polaris Venture Partners, a venture capital firm. Before joining Polaris in 2000, Mr. Spoon served for 18 years in a variety of roles with The Washington Post Company, including President, board member, and Chief Financial Officer. At The Washington Post, Mr. Spoon also was responsible for early stage technology investments in cellular companies, such as Cellular One and Digital PCS, distance learning and educational software, and digital media and e-commerce services. Prior to The Washington Post, Mr. Spoon was an officer at The Boston Consulting Group. In addition to serving on our board of directors, Mr. Spoon also sits on the boards of a variety of other companies, including Art.com, Focus Financial Partners, Remedy Health Media, Phreesia, Danaher Corporation and IAC/InterActiveCorp. In his not-for-profit activities, Mr. Spoon is a member of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Corporation and The Council on Foreign Relations. Mr. Spoon was also formerly a member of the MIT Corporation, and a member and Vice Chairman of the Smithsonian Board of Regents. He remains active in both institutions. Mr. Spoon earned his S.B. at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, an S.M. at M.I.T.'s Sloan School of Management, and a J.D., with honors, from Harvard Law School. Mr. Spoon was selected to serve on our board of directors due to his extensive experience with private and public company boards, management practices and involvement with private equity, providing insights into the Internet and technology industries as well as into acquisition strategy and financing.

Jason Trevisan has served on our board of directors since February 2007. Mr. Trevisan is a general partner with Polaris Venture Partners focusing on growth equity investments and buyouts in Internet, technology and healthcare industries. Before joining Polaris in 2003, Mr. Trevisan held various management roles at aQuantive, which was acquired by Microsoft, where he oversaw client relationships in industries including pharmaceuticals, media/entertainment, financial services and consumer products. Prior to aQuantive, Mr. Trevisan was a consultant with Bain & Company where his clients included private equity firms and Fortune 500 companies in technology, media and consumer products. In addition to serving on our board of directors, Mr. Trevisan is also a member of the board of directors of ShoeDazzle, Life Line Screening, PartsSource and Snappcloud. Mr. Trevisan received his M.B.A. with Distinction from the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth, where he was recognized as an Edward Tuck Scholar. Mr. Trevisan holds an A.B., cum laude, in English from Duke University. Mr. Trevisan was selected to serve on our board of directors due to his extensive experience in Internet and technology companies, as a venture capitalist and as one of our investors.

Nehemia (Hemi) Zucker has served on our board of directors since April 2012. Mr. Zucker has been the Chief Executive Officer of j2 Global, Inc., a Nasdaq-traded provider of business cloud services, since May 2008. Prior to that time, and beginning in 1996, he held various executive positions with j2 Global, as Co-President and Chief Operating Officer from August 2005 to May 2008, as Co-President from April 2005 to August 2005, as Chief Marketing Officer from May 2003 to August 2005, as Chief Marketing Officer and Chief Financial Officer from December 2000 to May 2003, and as Chief Financial Officer from 1996 to December 2000. Prior to j2 Global, Mr. Zucker was Chief Operations Manager of Motorola's EMBARC division, which packaged CNBC and ESPN for distribution to paging and wireless networks. From 1980 to 1996, he held various positions in finance, operations and marketing at Motorola in the United States and abroad. Mr. Zucker received his B.A. in Economics from Tel Aviv University. Mr. Zucker was selected to serve on our board of directors due to his extensive experience in Internet, technology and telecommunication companies and his international management experience.

Each officer serves at the discretion of our board of directors and holds office until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Our board of directors currently consists of six members. Our current certificate of incorporation and voting agreement provide for certain members of our board of directors to be elected by certain classes of our capital stock. The current members of the board of directors were elected as follows:

The voting agreement and the provisions of our certificate of incorporation by which the directors were elected will terminate in connection with our initial public offering, and there will be no further contractual obligations regarding the election of our directors. Our current directors will continue to serve as directors until their resignations or until their successors are duly elected by the holders of our common stock.

Immediately after this registration statement is declared effective by the SEC, our board of directors will consist of eight members. In accordance with our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws that will become effective immediately upon the completion of this offering, our board of directors will be divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. At each annual general meeting of stockholders, the successors to directors whose terms then expire will be elected to serve from the time of election and qualification until the third annual meeting following election. Upon the completion of this offering, our directors will be divided among the three classes as follows:

We expect that additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of the directors.

The division of our board of directors into three classes with staggered three-year terms may delay or prevent a change of our management or a change in control.

Under the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company's board of directors within a specified period of the completion of this offering.

Our board of directors has undertaken a review of its composition, the composition of its committees and the independence of each director. Based upon information requested from and provided by each incumbent and proposed new director to take office upon completion of this offering concerning his or her

background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, our board of directors has determined that Ms. Decker and Messrs. Cooperman, Spoon, Trevisan and Zucker do not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is "independent" as that term is defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE. In making this determination, our board of directors considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with us and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director.

Upon the completion of this offering, we will have an audit committee, a compensation committee and a governance and nominating committee. The composition and responsibilities of each committee are described below. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our board of directors.

Our audit committee provides oversight of our accounting and financial reporting process, the audit of our financial statements and our internal control function. Among other matters, the audit committee assists the board of directors in oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm qualifications, independence and performance; is responsible for the engagement, retention and compensation of the independent auditors; reviews the scope of the annual audit; reviews and discusses with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the results of the annual audit and the review of our quarterly consolidated financial statements including the disclosures in our annual and quarterly reports filed with the SEC; reviews our risk assessment and risk management processes; establishes procedures for receiving, retaining and investigating complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or audit matters; approves audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm; and reviews and approves related person transactions under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. In addition, our audit committee will oversee our internal audit function when it is established.

Upon the completion of this offering, the members of our audit committee will be Mr. McBride, who will be the chair of the committee, and Messrs. Cooperman and Zucker. All members of our audit committee meet the requirements for financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE. Our board of directors has determined that Messrs. McBride and Zucker are audit committee financial experts as defined under the applicable rules of the SEC and have the requisite financial sophistication as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the NYSE. All of the members of our audit committee are independent directors as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE.

Our compensation committee adopts and administers the compensation policies, plans and benefit programs for our executive officers and all other members of our executive team. In addition, among other things, our compensation committee annually evaluates, in consultation with the board of directors, the performance of our Chief Executive Officer, reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executives and evaluates the performance of these executives in light of those goals and objectives. Our compensation committee also adopts and administers our equity compensation plans. Upon the completion of this offering, the members of our compensation committee will be Mr. Zucker, who will be the chair of the committee, and Ms. Decker. All

of the members of our compensation committee are independent under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE, and Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code.

Our governance and nominating committee is responsible for, among other things, making recommendations regarding corporate governance, the composition of our board of directors, identification, evaluation and nomination of director candidates and the structure and composition of committees of our board of directors. In addition, our governance and nominating committee oversees our corporate governance guidelines, approves our committee charters, oversees compliance with our code of business conduct and ethics, contributes to succession planning, reviews actual and potential conflicts of interest of our directors and officers other than related person transactions reviewed by the audit committee and oversees the board self-evaluation process. Our governance and nominating committee is also responsible for making recommendations regarding non-employee director compensation to the full board of directors. Upon the completion of this offering, the members of our governance and nominating committee will be Mr. Cooperman, who will be the chair of the committee, Ms. Decker and Mr. Spoon. All of the members of our governance and nominating committee are independent under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE.

None of the members of our compensation committee is or has at any time during the past year been one of our officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serves or in the past year has served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of directors or compensation committee.

We will adopt a code of business conduct and ethics applicable to all of our employees, including our executive officers and directors, and those employees responsible for financial reporting. The code of business conduct and ethics will be available on our website. We expect that, to the extent required by law, any amendments to the code, or any waivers of its requirements, will be disclosed on our website.

Our named executive officers for 2011, which consist of our principal executive officer and the two other most highly compensated executive officers, are:

The following tables and narratives address and explain the compensation provided to our named executive officers in fiscal 2011. All figures below reflect our July 2011 3-for-1 forward stock split and a 2-for-3 reverse stock split which will be effective immediately prior to the effectiveness of this offering.

(1): The base salaries for the named executive officers were increased effective as of April 1, 2011 and are as follows: Mr. Suh—$340,000; Mr. Krupica—$255,000; Mr. Hartman—$225,000.
(2): Mr. Hartman was awarded a discretionary cash bonus award of $40,000 in fiscal 2011 (in addition to his fiscal 2011 performance-based incentive award described in footnote (4)) for his superior performance in heading the broad expansion of our legal plan services in fiscal 2011.
(3): Represents the total grant date fair value, as determined under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718, Stock Compensation, of all option awards granted to the named executive officer during fiscal 2011. Assumptions used to calculate these amounts are included in Note 8, "Stock Option Plans," to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. These stock options were each granted on September 29, 2011 and each has a maximum 10-year term and a per-share exercise price of $8.205 which was the fair market value of a common share on such grant date. Vesting terms are described in footnotes (5), (6), and (7) to the "—2011 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End" table below.
(4): The named executive officers earned the maximum cash incentive award for fiscal 2011 based on the achievement of annual company performance objectives as discussed in "—Annual Performance-based Cash Bonus Opportunity" below.
(5): We provided our named executive officers with additional benefits that we believe are reasonable, competitive and consistent with LegalZoom's overall executive compensation program. The incremental costs of these benefits are shown in the table below.

The following table provides the annual base salaries for each of the named executive officers for fiscal 2011 based on decisions made by the compensation committee in fiscal 2011. Fiscal 2011 salaries were adjusted effective as of April 1, 2011 as set forth below.

In addition to base salaries, our named executive officers were eligible to receive performance-based cash bonuses in fiscal 2011. The annual cash bonus payouts for the named executive officers in fiscal 2011 were based on the degree of attainment of LegalZoom's performance criteria.

For fiscal 2011, the annual performance-based cash bonus plan was based on a dollar pool determined alongside the establishment of LegalZoom's overall annual budget. Each named executive officer then had target and maximum bonus amounts established as set forth below:

Payment of a performance-based cash bonus was based on two company performance metrics: non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA and annual revenue growth. Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a definition of non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA and reconciliation to net income (loss), the most comparable U.S. GAAP item, see "Prospectus Summary—Summary Selected Financial and Other Data Non-GAAP discussion." These performance metrics were chosen based on the compensation committee's belief that attaining or exceeding targets for these metrics would increase LegalZoom's value and growth. The actual amount awarded for the fiscal 2011 cash bonus was primarily dependent on LegalZoom's achievement of a target annual revenue growth of 17.7%. However, in order for a named executive officer to receive any performance-based cash bonus, LegalZoom had to achieve a minimum non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA of $11.4 million. If LegalZoom did not achieve the minimum non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA of $11.4 million, regardless of its achievement of the annual revenue growth target, no cash bonus would have been paid to the named executive officers. If this non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA minimum was achieved, then the amount of the performance bonus would be determined based on the non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA and annual revenue growth results, with annual revenue growth receiving approximately 70% of the weighting and non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA receiving approximately 30% of the weighting.

If LegalZoom had achieved a target annual revenue growth of 17.7% and the minimum non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA of $11.4 million, the named executive officers would have received the target bonus amount. In all cases, the total annual cash bonus opportunity for each named executive officer for fiscal 2011 had a maximum payout of two times his target amount. If LegalZoom achieved approximately 26% or more in annual revenue growth (and met or exceeded the minimum non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA goal of $11.4 million), the named executive officers would have received the maximum bonus payout of two times their target bonus amount. If LegalZoom achieved between 17.7% and 26% in annual revenue growth (and met or exceeded the minimum non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA goal of $11.4 million), the

named executive officers would have received a ratable bonus payout amount in excess of his target bonus amount but not to exceed two times his target amount (maximum payout). As a hypothetical example, if LegalZoom achieved 21.85% in annual revenue growth and a non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA of at least $11.4 million, the bonus the named executive officers would have earned would be 150% of their target bonus.

For fiscal 2011, LegalZoom achieved an annual revenue growth of 29.2% and non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA of $11.8 million. As a result, the compensation committee awarded each of the named executive officers the maximum amount for fiscal 2011 performance-based cash bonuses, which amounts are reported above in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the 2011 Summary Compensation Table. In fiscal 2011, the compensation committee also awarded Mr. Hartman a $40,000 discretionary bonus in connection with his exceptional performance in fiscal 2011 in growing our legal plan services and almost tripling the number of subscribers in our legal plans.

Historically, the compensation committee and/or our board of directors has provided long-term equity incentive compensation to retain our named executive officers and to provide for a portion of their compensation to be at risk and linked directly with the appreciation of stockholder value. Long-term compensation has generally been provided through equity awards in the form of stock options subject to continued service and under the terms and conditions of our 2007 Stock Option Plan, which was renamed as the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (hereafter, referred to as the "2010 Plan"), and related award agreements. Through possession of stock options, our executives participate in the long-term results of their efforts.

The 2010 Plan, or the stock option grant agreements, can provide for some or all of the unvested stock options to vest immediately when certain events occur, including a change in control. For example, in the event of a corporate change in control transaction in which the named executive officer's stock options are not substituted, assumed or converted, then the named executive officer's stock options shall fully vest and become exercisable immediately prior to the consummation of the change in control.

The board of directors granted stock option awards to each of the named executive officers, except for Mr. Suh, in fiscal 2011. Mr. Suh did not receive an equity award in fiscal 2011, as he had received a stock option award in 2010 (and the other named executive officers had not). Details on stock option grants in fiscal 2011 are provided in footnote (3) to the "—2011 Summary Compensation Table".

We have generally not offered extensive or elaborate benefits to the named executive officers, except for permitting Mr. Krupica to stay in our corporate apartment located near our corporate headquarters and providing relocation benefits to Mr. Hartman. Further details on these benefits are described in footnote (5) to the "—2011 Summary Compensation Table". We also provide 401(k) matching contributions as discussed in the "401(k) Plan" section below.

The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock covered by stock options and restricted stock units held by the named executive officers as of December 31, 2011. All of the awards shown in the below table were granted under the 2010 Plan. Additionally, all of the stock options in the below table were granted with a per share exercise price equal to the fair market value of one of our shares of common stock on the date of grant. No stock options were exercised by the named executive officers during fiscal 2011.

(1): This option was granted on April 18, 2007 and the first vest date was February 9, 2007. This time-based option vested as follows: on the ninth day of each month following the first vest date, 1/48th of the option incrementally vested.
(2): This option was granted on February 25, 2010 and the first vest date was February 25, 2011. This time-based option vests as follows: (i) 10% of the option vested on the first vest date, (ii) 20% of the option vested on the one-year anniversary of the first vest date, (iii) 30% of the option vests on the two-year anniversary of the first vest date and (iv) 40% of the option vests on the three-year anniversary of the first vest date.
(3): This option was granted on June 24, 2008 and the first vest date was April 28, 2009. This time-based option vested as follows: (i) 25% of the option vested on the first vest date and (ii) the remaining 75% vested in equal quarterly installments on July 28, October 28, January 28 and April 28 over the three years following the first vest date.
(4): This stock units award was granted on April 20, 2010. These units shall become fully vested upon the earliest to occur of: (i) the closing of an initial public offering of shares pursuant to an effective registration statement with the SEC on the first business day that the shares have a closing trading price of $7.50 or more per share on a fully-diluted, as-converted basis; or (ii) the consummation of a change in control in which the net consideration to the then holders of shares is equal to or greater than $7.50 or more per share on a fully-diluted, as-converted basis and the change in control also constitutes a change in ownership or effective control of a corporation or change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of a corporation within the meaning of Code section 409A; or (iii) April 20, 2015. In addition, the units shall become fully vested upon the termination date of Mr. Krupica's employment if his employment is terminated by LegalZoom without cause (as defined in the 2010 Plan).
(5): This option was granted on September 29, 2011 and the first vest date is April 28, 2013.
(6): This option was granted on September 29, 2011 and the first vest date is July 31, 2012.
(7): These time-based options vest as follows: (i) 25% of the option vests on the first vest date and (ii) the remaining 75% shall vest in equal annual installments over the three years following the first vest date.

We previously entered into employment agreements with each of the named executive officers which were effective during fiscal 2011. Below are descriptions of these agreements, which have been superseded by new employment agreements.

Mr. Suh's offer letter, dated February 15, 2007 and amended on April 20, 2010, provided that he would serve as LegalZoom's Chief Executive Officer. It also provided that Mr. Suh would originally receive an initial annual base salary of $200,000, an annual performance-based bonus equal to approximately $200,000 and a stock option award. The agreement further provided that Mr. Suh was eligible to participate in employee benefit plans in accordance with LegalZoom's policies. This included medical programs, three weeks of paid vacation per year and reimbursement for all costs of his professional licensing and any professional organizations. Under the agreement, if LegalZoom terminated Mr. Suh's employment without "cause" then, conditioned on his providing a release of any employment related claims against LegalZoom, Mr. Suh would have been entitled to receive 12 months of continued salary and health insurance coverage. Further, if Mr. Suh resigned for "good reason" then, conditioned on his providing a release of any employment related claims against LegalZoom, Mr. Suh would have been entitled to receive 12 months of continued salary and health insurance coverage, any bonus earned and/or accrued through the date of termination and 12 months accelerated vesting of his unvested stock options. Upon an involuntary termination of Mr. Suh's employment within 12 months after a change in control of LegalZoom, he would have received a cash severance payment equal to one year of base salary and his then-outstanding unvested stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights and stock units would become fully vested immediately before his termination of employment. Additionally, upon the completion of a qualified initial public offering, such as the consummation of this offering, Mr. Suh would have received a one year acceleration of vesting for his then unvested stock options and a $100,000 cash bonus. The agreement further provided that LegalZoom would indemnify Mr. Suh for any liability incurred within the scope of his employment and that LegalZoom would maintain directors and officers liability insurance.

The agreement defined "cause" as Mr. Suh's (i) willful, intentional or grossly negligent failure to perform his duties under the agreement, (ii) admission or final conviction of a misdemeanor materially adversely affecting LegalZoom or of any felony, (iii) commission of an act of fraud against, or material misappropriation of property belonging to, LegalZoom, or (iv) material breach of any provision of the agreement that is not remedied within 30 days of his receipt of written notice from LegalZoom. The agreement defined "good reason" as (1) a breach by LegalZoom of its obligations under the agreement, (2) a significant reduction of Mr. Suh's duties, title or authority, or (3) any requirement or suggestion that Mr. Suh violated his professional ethics. The agreement defined "change in control" as any of the following events:

Mr. Krupica's offer letter, dated March 19, 2008 and amended on April 20, 2010, was effective upon the commencement of his employment in April 2008 and provided that he would serve in an at-will capacity as LegalZoom's Chief Financial Officer. It provided that Mr. Krupica would originally receive an initial annual base salary of $230,000, an annual performance-based bonus of up to $120,000 and a stock option award. The agreement also provided that Mr. Krupica was eligible to participate in employee benefit plans in accordance with LegalZoom's policies including medical and dental plans and that he would accrue 20 vacation days per year. Under the agreement, Mr. Krupica was permitted to stay in LegalZoom's corporate apartment which is near LegalZoom's headquarters. If LegalZoom had terminated Mr. Krupica's employment without "good reason" or if Mr. Krupica had experienced a "constructive termination" then, conditioned on his providing a release of any claims against LegalZoom, Mr. Krupica would have been entitled to receive six months of continued salary and health insurance coverage along with six months accelerated vesting of his unvested stock options. Upon an involuntary termination of Mr. Krupica's employment within the six months before or 12 months after a change in control of LegalZoom, his cash severance would have equaled one year of salary and his then outstanding unvested stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights and stock units would have become fully vested immediately before his termination of employment. The agreement further provided that LegalZoom would indemnify Mr. Krupica for any liability incurred within the scope of his employment and that LegalZoom would maintain directors and officers liability insurance. The agreement also imposed various restrictions on Mr. Krupica, for the benefit of LegalZoom, including maintaining the confidentiality of LegalZoom information.

Mr. Krupica's agreement defined "good reason" as Mr. Krupica's (i) commission of a crime involving dishonesty, breach of trust, or physical harm to any person, (ii) willful engagement in conduct that is in bad faith and materially injurious to LegalZoom, or (iii) willful refusal to implement or follow a lawful policy or directive of LegalZoom. The agreement defined "constructive termination" as (1) a material reduction in responsibility, (2) a material reduction in annual cash compensation except for reductions that are comparably applied to similarly situated executives, or (3) a relocation to a new work location that is more than 50 miles away from Mr. Krupica's current place of employment. Mr. Krupica's agreement provided for the same definition of "change in control" as described above for Mr. Suh.

Mr. Hartman's "Executive Employment, Confidential Information and Assignment of Inventions Agreement," dated March 25, 2004 and amended on April 20, 2010, was made effective as of the commencement of his employment in February 2001 and provided that he would serve in an at-will capacity as LegalZoom's Chief Strategy Officer. It provided that Mr. Hartman would originally receive an initial annual base salary of $130,000. The agreement also provided that Mr. Hartman was eligible to receive stock option grants, in the discretion of LegalZoom, and that he was eligible to participate in employee benefit plans in accordance with LegalZoom's policies, including paid time off and medical and dental plans. The agreement further provided that upon an "involuntary termination" of Mr. Hartman's employment within 12 months of a change in control of LegalZoom, his then-outstanding unvested stock options, restricted stock, stock units and stock appreciation rights would have become fully vested immediately before his termination of employment. The agreement also imposed various restrictions on Mr. Hartman for the benefit of LegalZoom, including maintaining the confidentiality of LegalZoom information and a 12 month post-employment non-solicitation of LegalZoom executives.

Mr. Hartman's agreement provided for the same definition of "change in control" as described above for Mr. Suh. Mr. Hartman's agreement defined "cause" generally to mean any of the following acts committed by Mr. Hartman and where such acts have not been cured or corrected:

Mr. Hartman's agreement defined "involuntary termination" as a termination of his employment due to any of the following:

In May 2012, the compensation committee unanimously approved new employment agreements and compensation arrangements with the named executive officers, which replace and supersede the predecessor employment agreements described above, effective May 9, 2012. The new compensation arrangements also include the potential future grant of stock option awards, on or around the date of this offering, to our named executive officers (see footnotes 4 and 5 to the table below). These stock options will generally have a per share exercise price equal to 115% of the price at which shares will be offered to be sold to the public in this offering and will vest as follows: 1/4 of the option vests on the first anniversary of the date of grant and the remaining 3/4 of the option will vest in equal quarterly installments over the following three years. Additionally, Mr. Suh will be granted a second stock option of 166,666 shares with a per share exercise price equal to 125% of the price at which shares will be offered to be sold to the public in this offering, and will vest as follows: 1/2 of the shares will vest annually on the third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant.

In determining the compensation for fiscal 2012 for the named executive officers, the compensation committee reviewed a compensation report prepared by its independent compensation consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., or FWCook & Co. The findings of the FWCook & Co. report were one factor that the compensation committee considered, but it was not the predominant basis for the compensation committee's compensation decisions for our named executive officers. The compensation committee wanted to provide further equity retention and incentive compensation for the named executive officers.

In accordance with the foregoing, on May 8, 2012, we entered into a new employment agreement with each of the named executive officers. These new agreements, which supersede and replace the prior employment agreements, each provide that the named executive officer will continue to serve in his same role(s). The following table highlights certain items contained in the new employment agreements for the named executive officers.

previously provided written notice to not so extend the term, except that the agreement shall in all cases expire no later than (and cannot be extended beyond) May 8, 2019.

(2): On the effective date of this offering, the annual base salaries of the named executive officers will be increased to the figures reflected in this column. The current base salaries for each of the named executive officers which were unchanged and which are reflected in the employment agreements are: Mr. Suh: $340,000; Mr. Krupica: $255,000; Mr. Hartman: $225,000.
(3): Each named executive officer will be eligible for an annual incentive bonus based on attainment of performance objectives that are prescribed and established by the compensation committee. LegalZoom intends to administer this bonus under our 2012 Management Incentive Plan. Further details on the 2012 Management Incentive Plan can be found in "—Incentive Compensation Plans—2012 Management Incentive Plan". The employment agreements further provide for an annual target bonus amount as a percentage of his annual base salary with such target percentage reflected in this column. The actual bonus paid may be more or less than the target amount. The named executive officer must remain employed with LegalZoom through the date of each of the bonus payment(s) in order to earn any performance bonus and receive such payment(s).
(4): Mr. Suh's agreement provides that two nonstatutory stock options to purchase a total of 433,332 shares will be granted to Mr. Suh on or around the effective date of this offering. 266,666 shares will be subject to the first option and will have a per share exercise price equal to 115% of the price at which shares will be offered to be sold to the public in this offering. 166,666 shares will be subject to the second option and will have a per share exercise price equal to 125% of the price at which shares will be offered to be sold to the public in this offering. The stock options will be on other terms and conditions (including vesting) set forth in the stock option agreements evidencing the grants.
(5): The agreements provide that a nonstatutory stock option (to purchase the number of shares shown in this column) will be granted to each named executive officer on or around the effective date of this offering. Each stock option will have a per share exercise price equal to 115% of the price at which shares will be offered to be sold to the public in this offering. The stock options will be on other terms and conditions (including vesting) set forth in the stock option agreements evidencing the grants.
(6): Mr. Suh's agreement provides that if his employment is terminated by us without "cause" or by Mr. Suh for "good reason," as defined in the agreement, each a "Qualifying Termination", then Mr. Suh will receive: (a) cash payments in an aggregate amount equal to 100% of his annual base salary in effect on his termination date paid in monthly installments over a 12 month period after the termination, with the first installment paid on the 60th day after the named executive officer's termination date; (b) LegalZoom will continue to pay the cost (to the same extent it was doing so immediately prior to the termination) for COBRA health insurance benefits for up to 12 months, and (c) the vesting of any of his unvested equity-based compensation awards (excluding any portion of any performance-based vesting awards which are/were forfeited due to failure to achieve the requisite performance objectives) will accelerate as if his service terminated 12 months later. Payment of the severance benefits will be conditioned upon Mr. Suh providing a release of claims against us, our affiliates and related parties.
(7): The agreements provide that if there is a Qualifying Termination, then the named executive officer will receive: (a) cash payments in an aggregate amount equal to 50% of the named executive officer's annual base salary in effect on his termination date paid in monthly installments over a six month period after the termination, with the first installment paid on the 60th day after the named executive officer's termination date; and (b) LegalZoom will continue to pay the cost (to the same extent it was doing so immediately prior to the termination) for COBRA health insurance benefits for up to six months. Mr. Krupica will also receive an acceleration of the vesting of his unvested equity-based compensation awards (excluding any portion of any performance-based vesting awards which are/were forfeited due to failure to achieve the requisite performance objectives) as if his service terminated six

months later. Payment of the severance benefits will be conditioned upon the named executive officer providing a release of claims against us, our affiliates and related parties.

(8): The employment agreements provide that if there is a Qualifying Termination during the time period that commences on the consummation of a change in control and extends through the date that is 24 months after a "change in control," as defined in the agreement, then the named executive officer will receive: (a) a lump-sum cash payment in an amount equal to a percentage of the named executive officer's annual base salary; (b) LegalZoom will continue to pay the cost (to the same extent it was doing so immediately prior to the termination) for COBRA health insurance benefits for up to nine months; and (c) any unvested equity-based compensation awards (excluding any portion of any performance-based vesting awards which are/were forfeited due to failure to achieve the requisite performance objectives) will fully vest. The cash severance shall be fully paid to the named executive officer in a single lump sum payment on the 60th day after his termination date. The amount in clause (a) above shall be equal to 100% of his then annual base salary for Mr. Krupica and equal to 75% of his then annual base salary for Mr. Hartman. For Mr. Suh, the amount in clause (a) above shall be equal to 150% of Mr. Suh's then annual base salary and the number of months in clause (b) shall be up to 18 months. Payment of the severance benefits will be conditioned upon the named executive officer providing a release of claims against us, our affiliates and related parties.
(9): In the event the named executive officer has received payments that are subject to golden parachute excise taxes, then such payments will be reduced to an amount which would result in no portion of the payments being subject to golden parachute excise taxes. Additionally, all compensation provided pursuant to the agreement is explicitly subject to our policy on recoupment of compensation, which policy is described above in "—Fiscal 2012 Compensation Decisions—Policy on Recoupment of Compensation", as adopted and/or modified from time to time and/or applicable law. Moreover, the agreement provides that the named executive officer is subject to, among other things, nondisparagement and nonsolicitation restrictions. Further, the agreements provide that the named executive officer is eligible to accrue up to 20 days of paid vacation per calendar year in accordance with LegalZoom's vacation policy.
(10): Under the new agreement, Mr. Suh will continue to be eligible to receive a one year acceleration of vesting for his then unvested equity-based compensation awards (and which were also outstanding as of the effective date of his new agreement) and a $100,000 cash bonus to be paid within 30 days of the completion of a public offering, such as this one, as provided in his prior agreement. Under the new agreement, Mr. Krupica will continue to be permitted to stay in LegalZoom's corporate apartment which is located near LegalZoom's headquarters, as provided in his prior agreement.

Our board of directors originally adopted the LegalZoom.com, Inc. 2007 Stock Option Plan on February 1, 2007 and such plan was approved by our stockholders in February 2007. On April 20, 2010, our board of directors amended and restated the 2007 Plan and renamed it the LegalZoom.com, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, or the 2010 Plan. Effective with this offering, we will no longer make new grants under the 2010 Plan and will instead issue equity compensation awards under our new 2012 Equity Incentive Plan discussed below. The 2010 Plan shall terminate upon the completion of this offering, provided however that all awards currently outstanding under the 2010 Plan will continue to remain outstanding pursuant to the terms of the 2010 Plan and applicable award agreements.

The 2010 Plan is administered by the compensation committee which has the authority, among other things, to:

The 2010 Plan provides that we may grant awards to our employees, non-employee directors, consultants, agents, advisors, or independent contractors and those of our affiliates. We may, on a discretionary basis, award these individuals with either stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and/or stock units.

Stock options may be granted under the 2010 Plan, including incentive stock options, as defined under Section 422 of the Code, and nonqualified stock options. A stock option gives the participant the right to buy a specified number of shares of our common stock for a fixed price during a fixed period of time. While we may grant incentive stock options only to employees, we may grant nonqualified stock options to any eligible participant. The option exercise price of all stock options granted under the 2010 Plan is determined by the compensation committee, except that every stock option will have a per share exercise price that is not less than 100% of the fair market value of a share on the date of grant. Stock options may be exercised as determined by the compensation committee, but in no event after the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. In addition, stock units may also be awarded under the 2010 Plan. A stock unit is a bookkeeping entry that represents the equivalent of a share of our common stock. A stock unit is similar to a restricted stock award except that participants holding stock units do not have any stockholder rights until the stock unit is settled with shares and certificates representing such shares have been issued by us to the holder. Stock units represent an unfunded and unsecured obligation for us and a holder of a stock unit has no rights other than those of a general creditor. Unvested equity awards are generally subject to forfeiture upon termination of a participant's employment. None of our named executive officers currently have any outstanding stock appreciation rights or restricted stock grants.

In the event that a change in control occurs and there is no assumption or continuation of awards, all awards shall vest and become exercisable as of immediately before such change in control. Under the 2010 Plan, a "change in control" is defined as:

A total of 6,694,692 shares of common stock can be issued under the 2010 Plan. 616,331 shares remained available for issuance under the 2010 Plan as of December 31, 2011. 289,498 shares remained available for issuance under the 2010 Plan as of March 31, 2012 and there were 4,422,599 shares subject to outstanding awards on such date.

In April 2012, our board of directors unanimously approved a form of the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2012 Plan, subject to later allocating a specific number of shares to the plan and obtaining stockholder approval of the plan. In July 2012, our board of directors determined the number of shares to

be subject to the 2012 Plan and unanimously adopted the 2012 Plan. Our stockholders approved the 2012 Plan in July 2012. Effective upon the closing of this offering, the 2012 Plan will replace and supersede the 2010 Plan with respect to providing discretionary equity compensation or certain performance-based cash awards to our key employees, directors and other service providers. Unless terminated earlier, the 2012 Plan will terminate in July 2022.

The 2012 Plan will be administered by the compensation committee or to a committee to whom our board of directors has delegated its authority, which has the authority, among other things, to:

Any of our employees, directors and consultants, as determined by the committee, may be selected to participate in the 2012 Plan. We may award these individuals with one or more of the following types of awards and all awards will be evidenced by an executed written agreement between us and the grantee:

Stock options may be granted under the 2012 Plan, including incentive stock options, as defined under Section 422 of the Code, and nonstatutory stock options. A stock option gives the participant the right to buy a specified number of shares of our common stock for a fixed price during a fixed period of time. The exercise price of all stock options granted under the 2012 Plan will be determined by the committee except that all stock options must have an exercise price that is not less than 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant. Stock options may be exercised as determined by the committee, but in no event after the tenth anniversary of the date of grant.

Stock appreciation rights entitle a participant to receive a payment equal in value to the difference between the fair market value of a share of stock on the date of exercise of the stock appreciation right over the exercise price of the stock appreciation rights. We may pay that amount in cash, in shares of our common stock, or in a combination of both. The exercise price of all stock appreciation rights granted under the 2012 Plan will be determined by the committee, except that all stock appreciation rights must have an exercise price that is not less than 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the

date of grant. The committee may, in its discretion, subsequently reduce the exercise price of, or modify, a stock appreciation right.

A stock award is the grant of shares of our common stock at a price determined by the committee (including zero), and which may be subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture until specific conditions or goals are met. During the period of vesting, participants holding shares of restricted stock generally will have full voting and dividend rights with respect to such shares.

A stock unit is a bookkeeping entry that represents the equivalent of a share of our common stock. A stock unit is similar to a restricted stock award except that participants holding stock units do not have any stockholder rights until the stock unit is settled with shares and certificates representing such shares have been issued by us to the holder. Stock units represent an unfunded and unsecured obligation for us and a holder of a stock unit has no rights other than those of a general creditor.

The 2012 Plan also provides that other equity awards, which derive their value from the value of our shares or from increases in the value of our shares, may be granted. In addition, cash awards, which are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Code section 162(m), may be issued to certain executives. And, substitute awards may be issued under the 2012 Plan in assumption of or substitution for or exchange for awards previously granted by an entity which we (or an affiliate) acquire.

Subject to certain adjustments in the event of a change in capitalization or similar transaction, we may issue a maximum of 2,700,000 shares of our common stock under the 2012 Plan. Subject to certain adjustments in the event of a change in capitalization or similar transaction, the maximum aggregate number of shares that may be issued in connection with any type of award, including incentive stock options, under the 2012 Plan is 2,700,000 shares. Additionally, the maximum number of shares available for issuance under the 2012 Plan and that may be issued in connection with any type of award, including incentive stock options, under the 2012 Plan will automatically increase, without the need for further approval by our stockholders, on January 1, 2013 and on each subsequent January 1 through and including January 1, 2022, by a number of shares equal to the lesser of (i) 5% of the number of shares issued and outstanding on the immediately preceding December 31 or (ii) 2,700,000 shares or (iii) an amount determined by our board of directors. Shares subject to awards that expire or are canceled will again become available for issuance under the 2012 Plan.

To the extent that an award is intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Code section 162(m), then the maximum number of shares of common stock issuable in the form of each type of award under the 2012 Plan to any one participant during a fiscal year shall not exceed 2,000,000 shares, in each case with such limit increased to 4,000,000 shares for grants occurring in a participant's year of hire or during the first fiscal year that a participant becomes a covered employee whose compensation is subject to the tax deduction limits of Code section 162(m). Additionally, no participant shall receive in excess of $4.0 million with respect to a cash award in any fiscal year or the aggregate amount of 2,000,000 shares pursuant to all awards issued under the 2012 Plan during any fiscal year, with such aggregate limit increased to 4,500,000 shares for awards occurring in a participant's fiscal year of hire or during the first fiscal year that a participant becomes a covered employee whose compensation is subject to the tax deduction limits of Code section 162(m).

The 2012 Plan provides that in the event there is a change in control and the applicable agreement of merger or reorganization provides for assumption or continuation of the awards, no acceleration of vesting shall occur. In the event that a change in control occurs and there is no assumption or continuation of awards, all awards shall vest and become exercisable as of immediately before such change in control.

The 2012 Plan provides our non-employee directors with the ability to receive restricted stock grants or stock units under the 2012 Plan in lieu of their annual cash retainer which is provided to them under our annual non-employee director compensation program, as described further in "—Compensation of Directors."

Under the 2012 Plan, we may cause the cancellation of any award, request reimbursement of any award by a participant and effect any other right of recoupment of equity or other compensation provided under the 2012 Plan in accordance with our policies and/or applicable law. In addition, a participant in the 2012 Plan may be required to repay us certain previously paid compensation, whether provided under the 2012 Plan or an award agreement under the 2012 Plan, in accordance with any recoupment policy of LegalZoom.

Our board of directors may terminate, amend or modify the 2012 Plan at any time; however, stockholder approval will be obtained for any amendment to the extent necessary to comply with any applicable law, regulation or stock exchange rule.

In April 2012, our board of directors unanimously approved a 2012 performance-based bonus compensation plan, subject to later determining an annual maximum bonus limit for participants under the plan, in which our named executive officers will be eligible to participate. In July 2012, our board of directors unanimously approved an annual maximum bonus limit of $4.0 million. This bonus plan is named the 2012 Management Incentive Plan, or the 2012 MIP. The 2012 MIP is intended to be exempt from the compensation deduction limitations imposed by Code section 162(m) until the first meeting of our stockholders, in which our board of directors members are elected, after the end of calendar year 2015. Our board of directors may amend or terminate the 2012 MIP at any time provided that any such amendment or termination will not adversely affect any outstanding bonus opportunity without the participant's written consent.

The compensation committee will administer the 2012 MIP. Guidelines, procedures and mechanics of the plan's administration may be promulgated by resolutions of the committee. Under the 2012 MIP, the compensation committee, in its discretion, shall:

Any employee who is an officer of ours within the meaning of Rule 16a-1(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, will be eligible to be selected to participate in the 2012 MIP.

Bonus amounts that have been earned will be paid in cash to a participant on any date designated by the compensation committee that occurs during the 2¹/2 month period immediately following the end of the performance period in which the applicable bonus amount was earned or upon an earlier change in control if such earlier-in-time payment would not cause the imposition of taxes under Code section 409A. No single participant may receive bonus payments under the 2012 MIP that in the aggregate exceed $4.0 million in any fiscal year.

On and after the date, if any, that compensation paid under the 2012 MIP is subject to the compensation deduction limits imposed by Code section 162(m), then any bonuses that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Code section 162(m) shall be administered by the compensation committee to comply with the applicable requirements of Code section 162(m).

Under the 2012 MIP, we may cause the cancellation of any bonus, request reimbursement of any bonus by a participant and effect any other right of recoupment of equity or other compensation provided under the 2012 MIP in accordance with our policies and/or applicable law. In addition, a participant in the 2012 MIP may be required to repay us certain previously paid compensation, in accordance with any recoupment policy of LegalZoom.

The 401(k) retirement savings plan is a defined contribution plan established in accordance with Code section 401(a). Employees may elect to defer between 1% and 100% of their eligible compensation into the plan on a pre-tax basis, up to annual limits prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service and we make an employer matching contribution to the plan in the amount of up to 50% of the first 8% of eligible compensation that employees defer each year. In general, eligible compensation for purposes of the 401(k) retirement savings plan includes an employee's wages, salaries, fees for professional services and other amounts received for personal services actually rendered in the course of employment with us to the extent the amounts are includible in gross income, and subject to certain adjustments and exclusions required under the Code.

In April 2012, our board of directors unanimously approved a Policy on Recoupment of Compensation, or Recoupment Policy, primarily to deter our current and former senior executives and other key employees from taking actions that could potentially harm us and to deter any financial or accounting irregularities with respect to our financial statements. We incorporated the Recoupment Policy into the 2012 Plan, the 2012 MIP and the new employment agreements. These plans and agreements provide that if we amend the Recoupment Policy from time to time, in our discretion, including to comply with applicable laws or stock exchange requirements or guidance, such amended policy will be incorporated into award agreements issued under these plans and/or the employment agreements, as applicable.

Pursuant to our Recoupment Policy, certain members of management, including all of the named executive officers (whether or not their employment has terminated), may be directed to return to us performance-based compensation that the executive had previously received if either:

In the event of a restatement of our financial statements, the compensation committee will review performance-based compensation awarded or paid to the named executive officers that was attributable to performance during the applicable time periods. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the compensation committee will make a determination as to whether, and how much, compensation will be recouped on an individual basis. If there has been no misconduct (as described in clause (ii) above), any recoupment of compensation will be limited to a three-year look-back period from the date we discovered the financial or accounting irregularity.

Moreover, if the compensation committee determines that one of the named executive officers has engaged in misconduct, the compensation committee may take actions with respect to such executive as it deems to be in our best interests and necessary to remedy the misconduct and prevent its recurrence. To the extent permitted by applicable law, such actions can include, among other things, recoupment of compensation (which would not be limited to the three-year look-back period) and/or disciplinary actions, including termination of employment. The compensation committee's power to determine the appropriate remedy is in addition to, and not in replacement of, remedies imposed by law enforcement agencies, regulators or other authorities.

The compensation provided to our non-employee directors in fiscal 2011 is enumerated in the table below. Directors who are also one of our employees, such as Mr. Suh or Mr. Liu, do not and will not receive any compensation for their services as a director. In the case of Mr. Suh, who is a named executive officer of LegalZoom for fiscal 2011, his compensation for fiscal 2011 is reported in the 2011 Summary Compensation Table above. Mr. Liu intends to resign his employment with us immediately upon the completion of this offering and will remain as a member of our board of directors and commence receiving compensation as a non-employee director.

Directors have been and will continue to be reimbursed for travel, food, lodging and other expenses directly related to their activities as directors. Directors are also entitled to the protection provided by their indemnification agreements and the indemnification provisions in our current certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as the certificate of incorporation and bylaws that will become effective immediately upon the completion of this offering. Two of our directors, Ms. Decker and Mr. Pourzanjani, were parties to offer letter agreements with LegalZoom which were effective in fiscal 2011 as discussed below.

Susan Decker and LegalZoom entered into an agreement, dated October 14, 2010, that provided that she would receive (i) $20,000 for each 12 month period of service on our board of directors and (ii) a stock option grant, issued under the 2010 Plan, to purchase up to 100,000 common shares with a $2.10 per share exercise price (which was the fair market value of a common share on the grant date). Subject to her continued service, this stock option vested as to 33,333 shares on October 14, 2011 and the remaining 66,667 shares vest pro-rata over the ensuing 24 months with any unvested portion of the stock option vesting in full upon a change in control of LegalZoom.

Kamran Pourzanjani and LegalZoom entered into an agreement, dated February 9, 2007, that provided that he would receive (i) $2,500 for each regular or special board of directors meeting, (ii) $5,000 annually for representation on any board of directors committee and (iii) a stock option grant, issued under the 2010 Plan, to purchase up to 200,000 shares of our common stock with a $1.789950 per share exercise price (which was the fair market value of a common share on the grant date). Subject to his continued service, this stock option vested in monthly pro-rata increments over a four year period and was

fully vested in February 2011. This stock option was fully vested and exercisable at the end of fiscal 2011 and Mr. Pourzanjani timely exercised the remaining outstanding shares subject to this stock option following his resignation in fiscal 2012. In November 2010, (i) Mr. Pourzanjani's agreement with LegalZoom was amended to provide that he would receive quarterly payments of $5,000 in exchange for his services on our board of directors and (ii) Mr. Pourzanjani was awarded an additional stock option grant, issued under the 2010 Plan, to purchase up to 40,000 shares of our common stock with a $2.10 per share exercise price. Mr. Pourzanjani fully exercised this stock option in 2010 and the acquired shares were subject to repurchase by LegalZoom at a $0.001 per share price upon termination of Mr. Pourzanjani's service. This repurchase right lapsed in monthly pro-rata increments until it had fully lapsed on February 9, 2012.

We did not grant any equity awards to our non-employee directors during fiscal 2011. As of December 31, 2011, our non-employee directors who served on our board of directors in fiscal 2011, held the following number of stock options and restricted shares and no other equity compensation awards:

In February 2012, in preparation for this offering, the compensation committee retained FWCook & Co. to provide compensation analysis and information for the committee and our board of directors with respect to future compensation for the non-employee members of our board of directors as we approached an initial public offering. FWCook & Co. provided the compensation committee and board of directors with a written report that summarized its findings. In April 2012, the board of directors, utilizing the data from the non-employee director compensation report provided by FWCook & Co., unanimously adopted a compensation program for fiscal 2012 for non-employee directors in connection with this offering. This fiscal 2012 non-employee director compensation program supersedes and replaces the previous compensation agreement between LegalZoom and Ms. Decker.

The following table presents our non-employee director compensation program that will generally become effective upon consummation of this offering:

Continuing non-employee directors are provided an annual stock unit award and nonstatutory stock option award in addition to a cash retainer to encourage directors to have a direct and material cash investment in shares of our common stock. It is expected that we will generally issue the annual stock unit and stock option awards at or around the date of our annual stockholders meeting. The number of stock units under each stock unit award will be determined using the closing price of a share of our common stock on the date of the annual stockholders meeting. The annual stock unit award will become 100% vested, and the shares underlying such stock unit awards will be distributed, become salable and create

taxable income, on the first anniversary of the grant date. The annual stock option award will typically have a per share exercise price equal to the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of grant and will have a ten-year term. The annual stock option award will vest at the rate of 1/12th per month on the first day of each of the 12 months following the month of the grant date, subject to continued service. In addition, the vesting of a director's stock unit and stock option awards will fully accelerate upon the occurrence of a change in control of LegalZoom. In the event of a director's separation from our board of directors, his or her outstanding stock options will remain exercisable for the lesser of three years or the remaining term of such stock option award(s). The annual stock unit and stock option awards will be pro-rated (based on months remaining until the next annual grant) for service if a director joins mid-year, which is measured from annual stockholder meeting to annual stockholder meeting.

Continuing non-employee directors are also provided an annual cash retainer (including an additional annual cash retainer if he or she is a chair of a committee as specified in the table above) that will be paid in arrears in equal installments on a quarterly basis. The per meeting attendance fee (specified in the table above) will also be paid in arrears on a quarterly basis. Each director may defer payment of all or a portion of his or her annual cash retainer, into a stock unit account, which units would be vested as of the date of grant. The election must be made in writing prior to the start of the new calendar year for subsequent elections or within 30 days of joining our board of directors for new directors. Such election may also need to be made earlier as necessary to comply with Code section 409A. The number of stock units to be credited to each director's account will be granted under the 2012 Plan, or other company equity compensation plan as determined by the board of directors, and is determined based on dividing the dollar amount of the deferred compensation by the closing price of a share of our common stock on the applicable retainer payment date. The shares underlying these stock units will be distributed at the sooner to occur of five years from the date of grant or separation from the board of directors, unless the director made an election to hold the stock units for longer than five years.

In addition to the annual stock unit and stock option awards and cash retainer referenced in the above table, a newly elected non-employee director will also receive a special one-time stock unit award valued at $18,000 and a special one-time stock option award to purchase up to 3,333 shares of our common stock, in connection with his or her commencement of service on our board of directors. The one-time stock unit award will have similar terms to those of the annual stock unit award except that it will vest in two equal annual installments on the first and second anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued service. The one-time stock option award will have similar terms to those of the annual stock option award except that it will vest at the rate of 1/24th per month on the first day of each of the 24 months following the month of the grant date, subject to continued service. In addition, the vesting of a newly elected director's one-time stock unit and stock option awards will fully accelerate upon the occurrence of a change in control of LegalZoom.

Ms. Decker became eligible to earn an annual cash retainer under this director compensation program effective April 1, 2012. However, Messrs. Spoon and Trevisan, who are each partners with our principal investor, Polaris Venture Partners, shall not receive any annual cash retainer before the effective date of this offering and shall only commence being eligible for such annual cash retainer after this offering if they are still then providing services on our board of directors. Each of the non-employee directors who are serving on our board of directors as of the effective date of this offering shall be granted, on or around the effective date of this offering, a pro-rated annual stock unit award and stock option award with the same vesting schedule as described above. This pro-rated annual stock unit award shall be in a value equal to the product of $55,000 multiplied by the quotient of (x) the number of months during the period of time commencing from the effective date of this offering until the 2013 annual stockholder meeting, divided by (y) 12. The stock options to be granted to Messrs. Cooperman, McBride and Zucker will have a per share exercise price equal to the price at which shares will be offered to be sold to the public in this offering. Stock options to be granted (in connection with this offering) to new directors who join the board of directors after the commencement of this offering will have a per share exercise price equal to the closing

trading price of one of our shares on the date of grant of such stock options. This pro-rated stock option award shall be in a number of shares equal to the product of 10,000 multiplied by the quotient of (x) the number of months during the period of time commencing from the effective date of this offering until the 2013 annual stockholder meeting, divided by (y) 12. Any new non-employee director who joins our board of directors prior to the completion of this offering will have his or her pro-rated annual stock unit award and stock option award augmented by the number of months he or she served on our board of directors prior to the completion of this offering. If a new non-employee director joins our board of directors prior to the completion of this offering, then Ms. Decker's pro-rated annual stock unit award and stock option award will be similarly augmented by the number of months commencing from the time that such new non-employee director first became a member of our board of directors through the effective date of this offering.

Additionally, in order to promote long-term alignment of directors and stockholder interests, a non-employee director is required to hold five times his or her annual cash retainer (excluding any cash retainer for service on a committee or as a committee chair or other service-related fees). Each non-employee director will be expected to attain or exceed the stock ownership guideline amount within five years of the later of the date of this offering or the date of such director's election to our board of directors, and to remain at or above the guideline.

Other than compensation arrangements, we describe below transactions and series of similar transactions, during our last three fiscal years, to which we were a party or will be a party, in which:

Compensation arrangements for our directors and named executive officers are described elsewhere in this prospectus.

Robert L. Shapiro, a co-founder and stockholder of LegalZoom, is a partner in Glaser, Weil, Fink, Jacobs, Howard & Shapiro, LLP, or Glaser Weil. For legal services rendered by Glaser Weil for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, we incurred approximately $12,000, $315,000 and $195,000 in expenses, respectively.

On May 31, 2005, LegalZoom authorized Mr. Shapiro to exercise a fully vested warrant for 4,000,000 shares of common stock (after giving effect to a 3-for-1 forward stock split effected in July 2011 and a 2-for-3 reverse stock split to be effected immediately prior to the effectiveness of this offering) for $50,000 through the issuance of a non-recourse promissory note. The warrant was initially issued on November 1, 2000 for public relations and consultancy services. The promissory note bore an annual interest rate of 5% and was due on May 31, 2010. On May 31, 2010, the principal and interest outstanding on the note totaling approximately $62,000 was applied in full in exchange for services rendered by Mr. Shapiro during the year ended December 31, 2010.

We expensed consultancy fees of $188,000, $250,000 and $125,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively, to Mr. Shapiro. Fees paid to Mr. Shapiro for the year ended December 31, 2010 includes the $62,000 of services rendered in exchange for the repayment of the non-recourse note previously issued in connection with the exercise of warrants for common stock on May 31, 2005 described above.

Castling Group LLC issued a full recourse promissory note to us for $310,470 on February 1, 2010 to Castling Group LLC, or Castling. John Suh, our Chief Executive Officer and member of our board of directors, is the managing member of Castling. The note bore interest at the rate per annum of 4% compounded annually and superseded an original note issued by Castling to us for $255,000, dated as of February 1, 2005, which was initially issued by Castling to us as part of the total purchase price of 680,000 shares of our common stock (after giving effect to a 3-for-1 forward stock split effected in July 2011 and a 2-for-3 reverse stock split to be effected immediately prior to the effectiveness of this offering) pursuant to our 2000 Stock Option Plan. The balance of $321,954, including principal and total accrued interest of $66,954 was repaid in full by Castling on December 31, 2010.

Frank Monestere, our President and Chief Operating Officer, issued three full recourse promissory notes to us for $5,174, $36,526 and $91,315, on February 1, 2010. The notes each bore interest at the rate per annum of 4% compounded annually and superseded three original note issued by Mr. Monestere to us for $4,250, $30,000 and $75,000, dated as of February 1, 2005, which were issued by Mr. Monestere to us as

part of the total purchase price of 85,000, 600,000 and 200,000 shares of our common stock (after giving effect to a 3-for-1 forward stock split effected in July 2011 and a 2-for-3 reverse stock split to be effected immediately prior to the effectiveness of this offering) pursuant to our 2000 Stock Option Plan. The balance of $137,724, including principal for each of the three notes and total accrued interest for each of the three notes of $28,474 was repaid in full by Mr. Monestere on December 17, 2010.

Compensation Arrangements, Stock Option Grants and Indemnification for Executive Officers and Directors

We have entered into offer letter agreements with our named executive officers that, among other things, provide for certain change in control benefits, as well as severance benefits for our named executive officers. For a description of these agreements, see "Executive Compensation—Executive Employment Agreements."

We have entered into agreements with our named executive officers regarding cash bonuses. For a description of these bonuses, see "Executive Compensation—Components of Executive Compensation— Annual Performance-based Cash Bonus Opportunity."

We have granted stock options and restricted stock units to our executive officers and certain of our directors. For a description of these equity awards, see "Executive Compensation—2011 Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-end" and "Executive Compensation—Incentive Compensation Plans—Compensation of Directors."

We will have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our current directors and executive officers before the completion of this offering. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law. See "Description of Capital Stock—Limitations of Liability and Indemnification."

Other than as described above under this section "Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions," since January 1, 2009, we have not entered into any transactions, nor are there any currently proposed transactions, between us and a related person where the amount involved exceeds, or would exceed, $120,000, and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. We believe the terms of the transactions described above were comparable to terms we could have obtained in arm's length dealings with unrelated third parties.

We plan to adopt a policy that our executive officers, directors, nominees for election as a director, beneficial owners of more than 5% of any class of our common stock and any members of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons are not permitted to enter into a related person transaction with us without the prior consent of our audit committee. Any request for us to enter into a transaction with an executive officer, director, nominee for election as a director, beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our common stock or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and pursuant to which such person would have a direct or indirect interest must first be presented to our audit committee for review, consideration and approval. In approving or rejecting any such proposal, our audit committee is to consider the material facts of the transaction, including, but not limited to, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related person's interest in the transaction. All of the transactions described above were approved or ratified by our board of directors.

The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2012, information regarding beneficial ownership of our capital stock by:

Beneficial ownership is determined according to the rules of the SEC and generally means that a person has beneficial ownership of a security if he, she or it possesses sole or shared voting or investment power of that security, including options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2012. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown that they beneficially own, subject to community property laws where applicable. The information does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose. No selling stockholder is a broker-dealer or an affiliate of a broker-dealer.

Our calculation of the percentage of beneficial ownership prior to this offering is based on 36,488,846 shares of our common stock (including preferred stock on an as converted basis) outstanding as of June 30, 2012. We have based our calculation of the percentage of beneficial ownership after this offering on 40,328,846 shares of our common stock outstanding immediately after the completion of this offering (assuming no exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option).

Common stock subject to stock options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2012, are deemed to be outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of the person holding these options and the percentage ownership of any group of which the holder is a member but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person.

Unless otherwise noted below, the address for each of the stockholders in the table below is c/o LegalZoom.com, 101 North Brand Boulevard, 11^th Floor, Glendale, California 91203.



	Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to this Offering⁽¹⁾						Shares Beneficially Owned After Offering					Shares Beneficially Owner After Over-Allotment
	Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to this Offering⁽¹⁾				Number of Shares Being Offered		Shares Beneficially Owned After Offering					Shares Beneficially Owner After Over-Allotment
Name of Beneficial Owner	Shares		%⁽²⁾		Number of Shares Being Offered		Shares		%⁽³⁾			Shares		%
5% Stockholders
Entities affiliated with Polaris Venture Partners⁽⁴⁾		12,798,370		35.1		3,500,000		9,298,370		23.1	500,000		8,798,370		21.8
Institutional Venture Partners XIII, L.P.⁽⁵⁾		5,361,754		14.7		—		5,361,754		13.3	—		5,361,754		13.3
KPCB Holdings, Inc., as Nominee⁽⁶⁾		2,336,642		6.4		—		2,336,642		5.8	—		2,336,642		5.8
Brian Liu⁽⁷⁾		3,123,922		8.6		320,770		2,803,152		7.0	55,152		2,748,000		6.8
Executive Officers and Directors
John Suh⁽⁸⁾		1,617,109		4.4		137,774		1,479,335		3.6	23,559		1,455,776		3.6
Frank Monestere⁽⁹⁾		634,827		1.7		22,772		612,055		1.5	3,894		608,161		1.5
Edward Hartman⁽¹⁰⁾		1,271,998		3.5		39,761		1,232,237		3.1	6,799		1,225,438		3.0
Fred Krupica⁽¹¹⁾		530,000		1.4		34,159		495,841		1.2	5,841		490,000		1.2
Sheila Tan		—		—		—		—		—	—		—		—
Tracy Terrill⁽¹²⁾		272,500		*		10,248		262,252		*	1,752		260,500		*
Chas Rampenthal⁽¹³⁾		188,000		*		—		188,000		*	—		188,000		*
Brian Liu⁽⁷⁾		3,123,922		8.6		320,770		2,803,152		7.0	55,152		2,748,000		6.8
Susan Decker⁽¹⁴⁾		61,108		*		—		61,108		*	—		61,108		*
Alan Spoon⁽¹⁵⁾ c/o Polaris Venture Partners		12,798,370		35.1		3,500,000		9,298,370		23.1	500,000		8,798,370		21.8
Jason Trevisan⁽¹⁶⁾ c/o Polaris Venture Partners		12,798,370		35.1		3,500,000		9,298,370		23.1	500,000		8,798,370		21.8
Nehemia (Hemi) Zucker		—		—		—		—		—	—		—		—
Daniel Cooperman⁽¹⁷⁾		—		—		—		—		—	—		—		—
Kenneth McBride⁽¹⁸⁾		—		—		—		—		—	—		—		—
All executive officers and directors as a group (14 persons)		20,497,834		56.2		4,065,484		16,432,350		40.8	596,997		15,835,353		39.3
Other Selling Stockholders
Robert Shapiro⁽¹⁹⁾		1,222,106		3.3		104,275		1,117,831		2.8	17,832		1,099,999		2.7
Thomas Newby		33,412		*		28,533		4,879		*	4,879		—		—
Daniel Williams		3,342		*		1,708		1,634		*	292		1,342		*

which is the sum of (a) the aggregate number of shares of common stock outstanding on June 30, 2012 and (b) the aggregate number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options beneficially owned by such owner and exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2012.

(3): The percentage of shares beneficially owned was determined based on a fraction, the numerator of which is the sum of (i) the number of outstanding shares of common stock beneficially owned by such owner and (ii) the number of shares issuable upon exercise of options beneficially owned by such owner and exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2012, and the denominator of which is the sum of (a) the aggregate number of shares of common stock outstanding after completion of this offering and (b) the aggregate number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options beneficially owned by such owner and exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2012.
(4): Consists of: (i) 12,349,586 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A held by Polaris Venture Partners V, L.P. (Polaris V); (ii) 240,694 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A held by Polaris Venture Partners Entrepreneurs' Fund V, L.P. (Polaris EFund V); (iii) 84,594 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A held by Polaris Venture Partners Founders' Fund V, L.P. (Polaris FFund); and (iv) 123,496 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A held by Polaris Venture Partners Special Founders' Fund V, L.P. (Polaris SFFV V, and collectively with Polaris V, Polaris EFund V and Polaris FFund V, the Polaris Funds). Polaris Venture Management Co., V, L.L.C. (Polaris M) is the General Partner of the Polaris Funds and has sole voting and investment power of the shares held by the Polaris Funds. Alan G. Spoon, Jason Trevisan, Jonathan A. Flint and Terrance G. McGuire are members of Polaris M and Messrs. Flint and McGuire are the Managing Members, and may be deemed to share voting and investment power over the securities held by the Polaris Funds. Messrs. Spoon, Trevisan, Flint and McGuire disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares held by the Polaris Funds, except to the extent of any pecuniary interest therein. The address of the Polaris Funds is 1000 Winter Street, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451.
(5): Consists of: (i) 3,022,460 existing shares of common stock and (ii) 2,339,294 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A. Institutional Venture Management XIII, LLC. (IVM XIII) is the sole General Partner of Institutional Venture Partners XIII, L.P., (IVP XIII) and has sole voting and investment control over the shares held by IVP XIII and may be deemed to beneficially own the shares held by IVP XIII. Todd C. Chaffee, Norman A. Fogelsong, Stephen J. Harrick, J. Stanford Miller and Dennis B. Phelps are the Managing Directors of IVM XIII and share voting and investment power over the shares held by IVP XIII. The address for IVP XIII is 3000 Sand Hill Road, Building 2, Suite 250, Menlo Park, California 94025. Pursuant to certain contractual agreements between certain of our stockholders, which we are not a party to, under certain circumstances up to 1,511,230 shares of common stock could be transferred to IVP XIII.
(6): Consists of: (i) 2,202,518 shares of common stock held by KPCB Digital Growth Fund, LLC (KPCB DGF) and (ii) 134,123 shares of common stock held by KPCB Digital Growth Founders Fund, LLC (KPCB DGFF) and held for convenience in the name of "KPCB Holdings, Inc. as nominee," for the accounts of such entities, each of whom exercise their own voting and investment power over such shares. The Managing Member for KPCB DGF and KPCB DGFF is KPCB DGF Associates, LLC. Brook Byers, L. John Doerr, Raymond Lane, Theodore Schlein, William Joy and Bing Gordon, the Managing Directors of KPCB DGF Associates, LLC, exercise shared voting and investment power over the shares directly held by KPCB DGF and KPCB DGFF. The address for KPCB Holding, Inc., as Nominee, is 2750 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025. Pursuant to certain contractual agreements between certain of our stockholders, which we are not a party to, under certain circumstances up to 1,168,321 shares of common stock could be transferred to KPCB Holdings, Inc., as Nominee.
(7): Pursuant to certain contractual agreements between certain of our stockholders, which we are not a party to, under certain circumstances Mr. Liu could transfer up to 192,038 shares of common stock to IVP XIII, up to 148,463 shares of common stock to KPCB Holdings, Inc., as Nominee, and up to 24,756 shares of common stock to certain other stockholders.
(8): Consists of: (i) 780,172 shares of common stock held by Mr. Suh; (ii) 333,333 shares of common stock held by John Hyunjeck Suh and Steven Keirn, Trustees of The John Hyunjeck Suh Grantor Retained Annuity Trust dated December 29, 2011 (Suh GRAT); and (iii) 503,604 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2012. Mr. Suh and Steven Keirn are co-trustees of the Suh GRAT and share voting and investment power over the shares held by the Suh GRAT. Pursuant to certain contractual agreements between certain of our stockholders, which we are not a party to, under certain circumstances Mr. Suh could transfer up to 99,894 shares of common stock to IVP XIII, up to 77,227 shares of common stock to KPCB Holdings, Inc., as Nominee, and up to 12,876 shares of common stock to certain other stockholders.
(9): Consists of: (i) 559,292 shares of common stock held by Mr. Monestere; (ii) 25,535 shares of common stock held by Francis C. Monestere, Trustee of the FRANCIS C. MONESTERE 2010 GRAT; and (iii) 50,000 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2012. Pursuant to certain contractual agreements between certain of our stockholders, which we are not a party to, under certain circumstances Mr. Monestere could transfer up to 28,916 shares of common stock to IVP XIII, up to 22,355 shares of common stock to KPCB Holdings, Inc., as Nominee, and up to 3,726 shares of common stock to certain other stockholders.
(10): Consists of: (i) 1,233,666 shares of common stock held by Mr. Hartman; (ii) 13,332 shares of common stock held by Mr. Hartman's minor children. Mr. Hartman and his wife, Risha Henry, share voting and investment power over the shares held

by their minor children; and (iii) 25,000 shares of common stock underlying options exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2012. Pursuant to certain contractual agreements between certain of our stockholders, which we are not a party to, under certain circumstances Mr. Hartman could transfer up to 43,900 shares of common stock to IVP XIII, up to 33,939 shares of common stock to KPCB Holdings, Inc., as Nominee, and up to 5,656 shares of common stock to certain other stockholders.

(11): Consists of: (i) 480,000 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2012; and 50,000 shares of common stock underlying restricted stock units that are exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2012.
(12): Consists of: (i) 60,000 shares of common stock held by The Terrill Living Trust (Terrill Trust); and (ii) 212,500 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2012. Mr. Terrill is the sole trustee of the Terrill Trust and has sole voting and investment power over the shares held by the Terrill Trust.
(13): Consists of: (i) 185,000 shares of common stock held by Mr. Rampenthal; and (ii) 3,000 shares of common stock underlying options exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2012. Pursuant to certain contractual agreements between certain of our stockholders, which we are not a party to, under certain circumstances Mr. Rampenthal could transfer up to 2,628 shares of common stock to IVP XIII, up to 2,032 shares of common stock to KPCB Holdings, Inc., as Nominee and up to 337 shares of common stock to certain other stockholders.
(14): Consists of 61,108 shares of common stock underlying options that are exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2012.
(15): All shares of common stock indicated as owned by Mr. Spoon are included because of his affiliation with the Polaris Funds. See footnote 4 above. Mr. Spoon disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares owned by the Polaris Funds except to the extent of any indirect pecuniary interest therein.
(16): All shares of common stock indicated as owned by Mr. Trevisan are included because of his affiliation with the Polaris Funds. See footnote 4 above. Mr. Trevisan disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares owned by the Polaris Funds except to the extent of any indirect pecuniary interest therein.
(17): Mr. Cooperman has been nominated to become a director effective immediately after this registration statement is declared effective by the SEC.
(18): Mr. McBride has been nominated to become a director effective immediately after this registration statement is declared effective by the SEC.
(19): Pursuant to certain contractual agreements between certain of our stockholders which we are not a party to, under certain circumstances Mr. Shapiro could transfer up to 315,454 shares of common stock to IVP XIII, up to 243,875 shares of common stock to KPCB Holdings, Inc., as Nominee and up to 40,667 shares of common stock to certain other stockholders.

The following descriptions of our capital stock and certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws are summaries and are qualified by reference to the amended and restated certificate of incorporation and the amended and restated bylaws that will be in effect upon completion of this offering. Copies of these documents will be filed with the SEC as exhibits to our registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part. The descriptions of the common stock and preferred stock reflect changes to our capital structure that will occur upon the completion of this offering.

Upon the completion of this offering, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide for one class of common stock. In addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will authorize shares of undesignated preferred stock, the rights, preferences and privileges of which may be designated from time to time by our board of directors.

Upon the completion of this offering, our authorized capital stock will consist of 200,000,000 shares, all with a par value of $0.001 per share, of which:

As of March 31, 2012, we had outstanding 36,416,374 shares of common stock, which assumes the conversion of all outstanding shares of our Series A into shares of common stock immediately prior to the completion of this offering. Our outstanding capital stock was held by 231 stockholders of record as of March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012, we also had outstanding options to acquire 5,057,645 shares of common stock held by current or former employees, directors and consultants outstanding granted under our 2000 Stock Option Plan and our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan and 50,000 restricted stock units to be settled in shares of our common stock granted under our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.

Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share on any matter to be voted upon by our stockholders. All shares of common stock rank equally as to voting and all other matters. The shares of common stock have no preemptive or conversion rights, no redemption or sinking fund provisions, and are not liable for further call or assessment and are not entitled to cumulative voting rights.

Subject to preferences that may apply to shares of preferred stock outstanding at the time, the holders of common stock are entitled to share equally, on a per share basis, with respect to any dividend or distribution of cash, property or shares of our capital stock paid or distributed by LegalZoom, out of funds legally available if our board of directors, in its discretion, determines to issue dividends and only then at the times and in the amounts that our board of directors may determine. See "Dividend Policy".

Upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, the holders of common stock will be entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after the payment of any liabilities and subject to preferences that may apply to shares of preferred stock outstanding at the time.

As of March 31, 2012, there were 7,628,000 shares of our Series A outstanding, which will be converted into 15,256,000 shares of common stock which will occur immediately prior to the completion of this offering.

Upon the completion of this offering, our board of directors may, without further action by our stockholders, fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of up to an aggregate of 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and authorize their issuance. These rights, preferences and privileges could include dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, liquidation preferences, sinking fund terms and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation of such series, any or all of which may be greater than the rights of our common stock. The issuance of our preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power of holders of our common stock and the likelihood that such holders will receive dividend payments and payments upon liquidation. In addition, the issuance of preferred stock could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control or other corporate action. Upon the completion of this offering, no shares of preferred stock will be outstanding, and we have no present plan to issue any shares of preferred stock.

After our initial public offering, certain holders of shares of our common stock that were issued upon conversion of our Series A, will be entitled to certain rights with respect to registration of such shares under the Securities Act. These shares are referred to as registrable securities. The holders of these registrable securities possess registration rights pursuant to the terms of our Investors' Rights Agreement dated as of February 9, 2007, or the IRA, and are described in additional detail below. We, along with Institutional Venture Partners XIII, L.P., entities affiliated with Polaris Venture Partners, as well as certain other parties, are parties to the IRA. We entered into the IRA in connection with the issuance of our Series A in 2007.

The registration of shares of our common stock pursuant to the exercise of registration rights described below would enable the holders to trade these shares without restriction under the Securities Act when the applicable registration statement is declared effective. We will pay the registration expenses, other than underwriting discounts, selling commissions and stock transfer taxes, of the shares registered pursuant to the demand, piggyback and Form S-3 registrations described below.

Generally, in an underwritten offering, the managing underwriter, if any, has the right, subject to specified conditions, to limit the number of shares the holders may include. The demand, piggyback and Form S-3 registration rights described below will expire five years after the effective date of the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part, or, with respect to any particular holder, at such time that such holder can sell its shares under Rule 144 of the Securities Act during any three month period.

Under our IRA, upon the written request of the holders of a majority of our registrable securities then outstanding that we file a registration statement under the Securities Act, we are obligated to use our reasonable best efforts to register the sale of all registrable securities that the holders may request in writing to be registered within 20 days of the mailing of a notice by us to all holders of such registration. We are required to effect no more than two registration statements that are declared or ordered effective. We may postpone the filing of a registration statement for up to 60 days twice in a 12-month period if in the good faith judgment of our board of directors such registration would be materially detrimental to us.

If we register any of our securities for public sale, either for our own account or for the account of other security holders, we will also have to register all registrable securities that the holders of such securities request in writing be registered within 20 days of mailing of notice by us to such holders of the proposed registration; however, we have no obligation to effect the registration of registrable securities held by the holders if the registrable securities sought to be included by the holders exceeds 67% of the total number of securities proposed to be offered and sold in connection with such registration. This piggyback registration right does not apply to a registration relating to any of our stock plans, stock purchase or similar plan, a transaction under Rule 145 of the Securities Act, a registration on any registration form that does not include substantially the same information as would be required to be included in a registration statement covering the sale of the registrable securities or a registration in which the only common stock being registered is common stock issuable upon conversion of debt securities which are also being registered. The managing underwriter of any underwritten offering will have the right to limit, due to marketing reasons, the number of shares registered by these holders to 30% of the total shares covered by the registration statement, unless such offering is our initial public offering, in which case, these holders may be excluded if the underwriters determine that the sale of their shares may jeopardize the success of the offering and none of our other stockholder's securities are included in the offering.

The holders of our registrable securities can request that we register all or a portion of their shares on Form S-3 if we are eligible to file a registration statement on Form S-3 and the aggregate price to the public of the shares offered is in excess of $7.5 million (net underwriting discounts and commissions, if any). We may postpone the filing of a registration statement for up to 90 days once in a 12-month period if in the good faith judgment of our board of directors such registration would be materially detrimental to us.

Upon the completion of this offering, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide for a board of directors comprised of three classes of directors, with each class serving a three-year term beginning and ending in different years than those of the other two classes. Only one class of directors will be elected at each annual meeting of our stockholders, with the other classes continuing for the remainder of their respective three-year terms. Because our stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights, our stockholders holding a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding will be able to elect all of our directors. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws to be effective upon the completion of this offering will provide that all stockholder actions must be effected at a duly called meeting of stockholders and not by a consent in writing, and that only the majority of our whole board of directors, the Chairman of our board of directors or our Chief Executive Officer may call a special meeting of stockholders.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws will provide that our directors may be removed only for cause and require an 80% supermajority stockholder vote for the rescission, alteration, amendment or repeal of the certificate of incorporation or bylaws by stockholders. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws will also provide that vacancies occurring on our board of directors for any reason and newly created directorships resulting from an increase in the authorized number of directors may be filled only by vote of a majority of the remaining members of our board of directors. Our amended and restated bylaws will establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder approvals to be brought before an annual meeting

of our stockholders, including proposed nominations of persons for election to our board of directors. The combination of the classification of our board of directors, the lack of cumulative voting, supermajority stockholder voting requirements, the ability of the board to fill vacancies and the advance notice provisions will make it more difficult for our existing stockholders to replace our board of directors as well as for another party to obtain control of us by replacing our board of directors. Since our board of directors has the power to retain and discharge our officers, these provisions could also make it more difficult for existing stockholders or another party to effect a change in management. In addition, the authorization of undesignated preferred stock makes it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to change our control.

These provisions may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or delaying changes in our control or management. These provisions are intended to enhance the likelihood of continued stability in the composition of our board of directors and its policies and to discourage certain types of transactions that may involve an actual or threatened acquisition of us. These provisions are designed to reduce our vulnerability to an unsolicited acquisition proposal. The provisions also are intended to discourage certain tactics that may be used in proxy fights. However, such provisions could have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for our shares and, as a consequence, they also may inhibit fluctuations in the market price of our stock that could result from actual or rumored takeover attempts.

We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any business combination with any interested stockholder for a period of three years after the date that such stockholder became an interested stockholder, with the following exceptions:

In general, Section 203 defines an "interested stockholder" as an entity or person who, together with the person's affiliates and associates, beneficially owns, or within a period of three years prior to the time of determination of interested stockholder status did own, 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty; any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws; or any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. The enforceability of similar choice of forum provisions in other companies' certificates of incorporation has been challenged in legal proceedings, and a court could find these types of provisions to be inapplicable or unenforceable.

As permitted by Delaware law, provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws that will become effective immediately upon the completion of this offering will limit or eliminate the personal liability of our directors. Consequently, directors will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages or breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability for:

These limitations of liability do not alter director liability under the federal securities laws and do not affect the availability of equitable remedies, such as an injunction or rescission.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws that will become effective immediately upon the completion of this offering also require us to indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law and, as described under "Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions," we have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and officers.

These provisions may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions may also have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against directors and officers, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders. Furthermore, your investment in our stock may be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers pursuant to these indemnification provisions. We believe that these provisions, the indemnification agreements and the insurance are necessary to attract and retain talented and experienced directors and officers.

At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors or officers where indemnification will be required or permitted. We are not aware of any threatened litigation or proceeding that might result in a claim for such indemnification.

We have applied for listing of our common stock on the NYSE under the symbol "LGZ."

Upon the completion of this offering, the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock will be Wells Fargo Bank N.A.

Before our initial public offering, there has not been a public market for shares of our common stock. Future sales of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock, including shares issued upon the settlement of restricted stock units and exercise of outstanding options, in the public market after our initial public offering, or the possibility of these sales occurring, could cause the prevailing market price for our common stock to fall or impair our ability to raise equity capital in the future.

After our initial public offering, we will have outstanding 40,256,374 shares of our common stock, based on the number of shares outstanding as of March 31, 2012. This includes 8,000,000 shares that we and the selling stockholders are selling in our initial public offering, which shares may be resold in the public market immediately following our initial public offering, and assumes no additional exercise of outstanding options.

The 32,256,374 shares of common stock that were not offered and sold in our initial public offering as well as 5,067,645 shares of common stock underlying outstanding stock options and restricted stock units will be upon issuance, "restricted securities," as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. These restricted securities are eligible for public sale only if they are registered under the Securities Act or if they qualify for an exemption from registration under Rule 144 or Rule 701 under the Securities Act, which are summarized below.

As a result of the lock-up agreements described under "Underwriting" and subject to the provisions of Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities Act, these restricted securities will be available for sale in the public market as follows:

In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, once we have been subject to public company reporting requirements for at least 90 days, a person who is not deemed to have been one of our affiliates for purposes of the Securities Act at any time during the 90 days preceding a sale and who has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least six months, including the holding period of any prior owner other than our affiliates, is entitled to sell those shares without complying with the manner of sale, volume limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144, subject to compliance with the public information requirements of Rule 144. If such a person has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least one year, including the holding period of any prior owner other than our affiliates, then that person is entitled to sell those shares without complying with any of the requirements of Rule 144.

In general, under Rule 144, as currently in effect, our affiliates or persons selling shares on behalf of our affiliates are entitled to sell upon the expiration of the lock-up agreements described below, within any three-month period beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:

Sales under Rule 144 by our affiliates or persons selling shares on behalf of our affiliates are also subject to certain manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us.

In general, under Rule 701 as currently in effect, any of our employees, consultants or advisors who purchase shares from us in connection with a compensatory stock or option plan or other written agreement in a transaction before the effective date of our initial public offering that was completed in reliance on Rule 701 and complied with the requirements of Rule 701 will, subject to the lock-up restrictions described under "Underwriting," be eligible to resell such shares 90 days after the date of this prospectus in reliance on Rule 144, but without compliance with certain restrictions, including the holding period, contained in Rule 144.

All of our directors and executive officers and the holders of approximately 97% of our securities have signed lock-up agreements under which they have agreed not to sell, transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of our common stock without the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Finner & Smith Incorporated or LegalZoom for a period of 180 days, subject to possible extension under certain circumstances, after the date of this prospectus. These agreements are described below under "Underwriting."

On the date beginning 180 days after the date of this prospectus, the holders of approximately 11,725,759 shares of our common stock, or their transferees, will be entitled to certain rights with respect to the registration of those shares under the Securities Act. For a description of these registration rights, please see "Description of Capital Stock—Registration Rights." If these shares are registered, they will be freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act.

As soon as practicable after the completion of this offering, we intend to file a Form S-8 registration statement under the Securities Act to register shares of our common stock subject to options outstanding or reserved for issuance under our 2000 Stock Option Plan, our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan and our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. This registration statement will become effective immediately upon filing, and shares covered by that registration statement will thereupon be eligible for sale in the public markets, subject to vesting restrictions, the lock-up agreements described under "Underwriting" and Rule 144 limitations applicable to affiliates. For a more complete discussion of our stock plans, see "Executive Compensation—Incentive Compensation Plans."

The following is a general discussion of certain material U.S. federal tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common stock purchased pursuant to this offering by "Non-U.S. Holders (as defined below). This discussion is a summary for general information purposes only and does not consider all aspects of federal taxation that may be relevant to particular Non-U.S. Holders in light of their individual investment circumstances or to certain types of Non-U.S. Holders subject to special tax rules, including partnerships or other pass-through entities, banks, financial institutions or other financial services entities, broker-dealers, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment companies, corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, persons who use or are required to use mark-to-market accounting, persons that hold our shares as part of a "straddle," a "hedge" or a "conversion transaction," certain former citizens or permanent residents of the United States, investors in pass-through entities, or persons subject to the alternative minimum tax. In addition, this summary does not address any tax considerations that may apply to Non-U.S. Holders of our common stock under state, local or non-U.S. tax laws, or, except to the extent discussed below, the effects of any applicable gift or estate tax.

This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations, rulings, administrative pronouncements and decisions as of the date of this registration statement, all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations at any time with possible retroactive effect. We have not sought, and will not seek, any ruling from the Internal Revenue Service or IRS with respect to the tax consequences discussed herein, and there can be no assurance that the IRS will not take a position contrary to the tax consequences discussed below or that any position taken by the IRS would not be sustained. This discussion assumes that a Non-U.S. Holder will hold our common stock as a capital asset within the meaning of the Code (generally property held for investment).

For purposes of this discussion, the term "Non-U.S. Holder" means a beneficial owner of our shares that is not:

An individual that is not a U.S. citizen may, in many cases, be deemed to be a U.S. resident, as opposed to a nonresident alien, by virtue of being present in the United States for at least 31 days in the calendar year and for an aggregate of at least 183 days during a three-year period ending in the current calendar year. For these purposes, all the days present in the current year, one-third of the days present in the immediately preceding year, and one-sixth of the days present in the second preceding year are counted. Resident aliens are generally subject to U.S. federal income tax as if they were U.S. citizens. Such an individual is urged to consult his or her own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership or disposition of our common stock. If a partnership (or entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is a beneficial owner of our common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner of a partnership holding our shares,

you should consult your tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership, and disposition of our common stock.

This discussion is not tax advice. Prospective investors are urged to consult their own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, state and local, and non-U.S. income and other tax considerations of acquiring, holding and disposing of shares of our common stock.

In general, dividends paid to a Non-U.S. Holder (to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles) will be subject to U.S. withholding tax at a rate equal to 30% of the gross amount of the dividend, or a lower rate prescribed by an applicable income tax treaty, unless the dividends are effectively connected with a trade or business carried on by the Non-U.S. Holder within the United States. Any distribution not constituting a dividend will be treated first as reducing the Non-U.S. Holder's basis in its shares of common stock, and to the extent it exceeds the Non-U.S. Holders basis, as capital gain (see "Sale of Other Taxable Disposition of Common stock" below).

A Non-U.S. Holder who claims the benefit of an applicable income tax treaty generally will be required to satisfy certain certification and other requirements prior to the distribution date. Non-U.S. Holders must generally provide the withholding agent with a properly executed IRS Form W-8BEN claiming an exemption from or reduction in withholding under an applicable income tax treaty. If tax is withheld in an amount in excess of the amount applicable under an income tax treaty, a refund of the excess amount may generally be obtained by filing an appropriate claim for refund with the IRS. Non-U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding their entitlement to benefits under an applicable income tax treaty.

Dividends that are effectively connected with a Non-U.S. Holder's conduct of a U.S. trade or business (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment of the Non-U.S. Holder) generally will not be subject to U.S. withholding tax if the Non-U.S. Holder files the required forms, including IRS Form W-8ECI, or any successor form, with the payor of the dividend, but instead generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis in the same manner as if the Non-U.S. Holder were a resident of the United States. A corporate Non-U.S. Holder that receives effectively connected dividends may be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a rate of 30%, or a lower rate prescribed by an applicable income tax treaty, on the repatriation from the United States of its "effectively connected earnings and profits" for the taxable year, as adjusted for certain items.

In general, a Non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain realized upon the sale or other taxable disposition of the Non-U.S. Holder's shares of common stock unless:

Net gain realized by a Non-U.S. Holder described in clause (i) above generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax in the same manner as if the Non-U.S. Holder were a resident of the United States. Any gains of a corporate Non-U.S. Holder described in clause (i) above may also be subject to an additional "branch profits tax" at a 30% rate, or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.

Gain realized by an individual Non-U.S. Holder described in clause (ii) above will be subject to a flat 30 percent tax, which may be offset by U.S. source capital losses, even though the individual is not considered a resident of the United States.

For purposes of clause (iii) above, a corporation is a United States real property holding corporation if the fair market value of its United States real property interests equals or exceeds 50% of the sum of the fair market value of its worldwide real property interests plus its other assets used or held for use in a trade or business. We believe that we are not, and we do not anticipate that we will become, a United States real property holding corporation.

The estate of a nonresident alien individual is generally are subject to U.S. federal estate tax on property having a U.S. situs. Because we are a U.S. corporation, our common stock will be U.S. situs property and therefore will be included in the taxable estate of a nonresident alien decedent, unless an applicable estate tax treaty between the United States and the decedent's country of residence provides otherwise.

Generally, we must report annually to the IRS and to each Non-U.S. Holder the amount of dividends paid, the name and address of the recipient, and the amount, if any, of tax withheld. These information reporting requirements apply even if withholding was not required because the dividends were effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder's conduct of a trade or business within the United States or withholding was reduced by an applicable income tax treaty. Under applicable income tax treaties or other agreements, the IRS may make its reports available to the tax authorities in the Non-U.S. Holder's country of residence.

Dividends paid to a Non-U.S. Holder that is not an exempt recipient generally will be subject to backup withholding, currently at a rate of 28% of the gross proceeds, unless the Non-U.S. Holder certifies as to its foreign status, which certification may generally be made on IRS Form W-8BEN.

Proceeds from the sale or other disposition of common stock by a Non-U.S. Holder effected by or through a U.S. office of a broker will generally be subject to information reporting and backup withholding, currently at a rate of 28% of the gross proceeds, unless the Non-U.S. Holder certifies to the payor under penalties of perjury as to, among other things, its name, address and status as a Non-U.S. Holder or otherwise establishes an exemption. Payment of disposition proceeds effected outside the United States by or through a non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker generally will not be subject to information reporting or backup withholding if the payment is not received in the United States. Information reporting, but generally not backup withholding, will apply to such a payment if the broker has certain connections with the United States unless the broker has documentary evidence in its records that the beneficial owner thereof is a Non-U.S. Holder and specified conditions are met or an exemption is otherwise established.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amount withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a Non-U.S. Holder that results in an overpayment of taxes generally will be refunded, or credited against the holder's U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

A U.S. federal withholding tax of 30% may apply to dividends and the gross proceeds of a disposition of our common stock paid to a "foreign financial institution" (as specially defined under these rules) unless such institution enters into an agreement with the U.S. government to withhold on certain payments and to collect and provide to the U.S. tax authorities substantial information regarding certain U.S. account holders of such institution (which includes certain equity holders of such institution, as well as certain account holders that are foreign entities with U.S. owners). This U.S. federal withholding tax of 30% will also apply to payments of dividends and the gross proceeds of a disposition of our common stock paid to a non-financial foreign entity unless such entity either certifies it does not have any substantial U.S. owners or provides the withholding agent with a certification identifying substantial direct and indirect U.S. owners of the entity. The withholding tax described above will also not apply if the foreign financial institution or non-financial foreign entity otherwise qualifies for an exemption from the rules. Under certain circumstances, a Non-U.S. Holder might be eligible for refunds or credits of such taxes. Prospective investors are encouraged to consult with their own tax advisors regarding the possible implications of this legislation on their investment in our common stock.

Although these rules currently apply to applicable payments made after December 31, 2012, the IRS has issued Proposed Treasury Regulations providing that the withholding provisions described above will generally apply to payments of dividends made on or after January 1, 2014 and to payments of gross proceeds from a sale or other disposition of common stock on or after January 1, 2015.

Under the terms and subject to the conditions in an underwriting agreement dated the date of this prospectus, the underwriters named below, for whom Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated are acting as representatives, have severally agreed to purchase, and we and the selling stockholders have agreed to sell to them, severally, the number of shares indicated below:

The underwriters and the representatives are collectively referred to as the "underwriters" and the "representatives," respectively. The underwriters are offering the shares of common stock subject to their acceptance of the shares from us and subject to prior sale. The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the several underwriters to pay for and accept delivery of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus are subject to the approval of certain legal matters by their counsel and to certain other conditions. The underwriters are obligated to take and pay for all of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus if any such shares are taken. However, the underwriters are not required to take or pay for the shares covered by the underwriters' over-allotment option described below.

The underwriters initially propose to offer part of the shares of common stock directly to the public at the offering price listed on the cover page of this prospectus and part to certain dealers. After the initial offering of the shares of common stock, the offering price and other selling terms may from time to time be varied by the representatives.

We and the selling stockholders have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days from the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to 1,200,000 additional shares of common stock at the public offering price listed on the cover page of this prospectus, less underwriting discounts and commissions. The underwriters may exercise this option solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any, made in connection with the offering of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus. To the extent the option is exercised, each underwriter will become obligated, subject to certain conditions, to purchase about the same percentage of the additional shares of common stock as the number listed next to the underwriter's name in the preceding table bears to the total number of shares of common stock listed next to the names of all underwriters in the preceding table.

The following table shows the per share and total public offering price, underwriting discounts and commissions, and proceeds before expenses to us and the selling stockholders. These amounts are shown

assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters' option to purchase up to an additional shares of common stock.

The estimated offering expenses payable by us, exclusive of the underwriting discounts and commissions, are approximately $3.4 million, which includes legal, accounting and printing costs and various other fees associated with the listing of our common stock.

The underwriters have informed us that they do not intend sales to discretionary accounts to exceed 5% of the total number of shares of common stock offered by them.

We have applied for listing of our common stock on the NYSE under the trading symbol "LGZ".

We and all directors and officers and the holders of approximately 97% of our outstanding stock and stock options are subject to lock-up agreements with the underwriters or us. Pursuant to the lock-up agreements with the underwriters, such persons have agreed that, without the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated on behalf of the underwriters, we and they will not, during the period ending 180 days after the date of this prospectus:

The restrictions apply whether any such transaction described above is to be settled by delivery of common stock or such other securities, in cash or otherwise. In addition, we and each such person agrees that, without the prior written consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated on behalf of the underwriters, we or such other person will not, during the 180-day restricted period, make any demand for, or exercise any right with respect to, the registration of any shares of common stock or any security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock. Pursuant to lock-up agreements in their incentive stock option agreements, such persons have agreed not to directly or indirectly offer, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant for the sale of or otherwise dispose of or transfer any shares of our common stock held by it without our prior written consent for a period of 180 days.

The restrictions described in the immediately preceding paragraph to do not apply to:

The 180-day restricted period in the lock-up agreements with the underwriters described in the second preceding paragraph will be extended if:

in which case the restrictions described in the second preceding paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the occurrence of the material news or material event.

In order to facilitate the offering of the common stock, the underwriters may engage in transactions that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the price of the common stock. Specifically, the underwriters may sell more shares than they are obligated to purchase under the underwriting agreement, creating a short position. A short sale is covered if the short position is no greater than the number of shares available for purchase by the underwriters under the over-allotment option. The underwriters can close out a covered short sale by exercising the over-allotment option or purchasing shares in the open market. In determining the source of shares to close out a covered short sale, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the open market price of shares compared to the price available under the over-allotment

option. The underwriters may also sell shares in excess of the over-allotment option, creating a naked short position. The underwriters must close out any naked short position by purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of the common stock in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in this offering. As an additional means of facilitating this offering, the underwriters may bid for, and purchase, shares of common stock in the open market to stabilize the price of the common stock. These activities may raise or maintain the market price of the common stock above independent market levels or prevent or retard a decline in the market price of the common stock. The underwriters are not required to engage in these activities and may end any of these activities at any time.

We, the selling stockholders and the underwriters have agreed to indemnify each other against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on websites maintained by one or more underwriters, or selling group members, if any, participating in this offering. The representatives may agree to allocate a number of shares of common stock to underwriters for sale to their online brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be allocated by the representatives to underwriters that may make Internet distributions on the same basis as other allocations.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. The initial public offering price was determined by negotiations between us and the representatives. Among the factors considered in determining the initial public offering price were our future prospects and those of our industry in general, our sales, earnings and certain other financial and operating information in recent periods, and the price-earnings ratios, price-sales ratios, market prices of securities, and certain financial and operating information of companies engaged in activities similar to ours.

At our request, the underwriters have reserved up to 150,000 shares, or approximately 1.9%, of the common stock offered by this prospectus for sale, at the initial public offering price, to our directors, officers, employees and certain other persons who are otherwise associated with us. The number of shares of our common stock available for sale to the general public will be reduced to the extent these persons purchase such reserved shares. Any reserved shares of our common stock that are not so purchased will be offered by the underwriters to the general public on the same terms as the other shares of our common stock offered by this prospectus. We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities and expenses, including liabilities under the Securities Act, in connection with sales of the reserved shares.

Some of the underwriters and their affiliates have engaged, and may in the future engage, in investment banking and other commercial dealings in the ordinary course of business with us or our affiliates. They have received, or may in the future receive, customary fees and commissions for these transactions.

In addition, in the ordinary course of their business activities, the underwriters and their affiliates may make or hold a broad array of investments and actively trade debt and equity securities (or related derivative securities) and financial instruments (including bank loans) for their own account and for the accounts of their customers. Such investments and securities activities may involve securities and/or instruments of ours or our affiliates. The underwriters and their affiliates may also make investment recommendations and/or publish or express independent research views in respect of such securities or

financial instruments and may hold, or recommend to customers that they acquire, long and/or short positions in such securities and instruments.

In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a "Relevant Member State") an offer to the public of any shares of our common stock may not be made in that Relevant Member State, except that an offer to the public in that Relevant Member State of any shares of our common stock may be made at any time under the following exemptions under the Prospectus Directive, if they have been implemented in that Relevant Member State:

For the purposes of this provision, the expression an "offer to the public" in relation to any shares of our common stock in any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and any shares of our common stock to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase any shares of our common stock, as the same may be varied in that Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Member State, the expression "Prospectus Directive" means Directive 2003/71/EC (and amendments thereto, including the 2010 PD Amending Directive, to the extent implemented in the Relevant Member State), and includes any relevant implementing measure in the Relevant Member State, and the expression "2010 PD Amending Directive" means Directive 2010/73/EU.

This prospectus and any other material in relation to the shares described herein is only being distributed to, and is only directed at, persons in the United Kingdom that are qualified investors within the meaning of Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospective Directive ("qualified investors") that also (i) have professional experience in matters relating to investments falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, as amended, or the Order, (ii) who fall within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order or (iii) to whom it may otherwise lawfully be communicated (all such persons together being referred to as "relevant persons"). The shares are only available to, and any invitation, offer or agreement to purchase or otherwise acquire such shares will be engaged in only with, relevant persons. This prospectus and its contents are confidential and should not be distributed, published or reproduced (in whole or in part) or disclosed by recipients to any other person in the United Kingdom. Any person in the United Kingdom that is not a relevant person should not act or rely on this prospectus or any of its contents.

The shares may not be publicly offered in Switzerland and will not be listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange (SIX) or on any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. This document has been prepared without regard to the disclosure standards for issuance prospectuses under art. 652a or

art. 1156 of the Swiss Code of Obligations or the disclosure standards for listing prospectuses under art. 27 ff. of the SIX Listing Rules or the listing rules of any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. Neither this document nor any other offering or marketing material relating to the shares or the offering may be publicly distributed or otherwise made publicly available in Switzerland.

Neither this document nor any other offering or marketing material relating to the offering, the Company, or the shares have been or will be filed with or approved by any Swiss regulatory authority. In particular, this document will not be filed with, and the offer of shares will not be supervised by, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA (FINMA), and the offer of shares has not been and will not be authorized under the Swiss Federal Act on Collective Investment Schemes (CISA). The investor protection afforded to acquirers of interests in collective investment schemes under the CISA does not extend to acquirers of the shares.

This prospectus relates to an Exempt Offer in accordance with the Offered Securities Rules of the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA). This prospectus is intended for distribution only to persons of a type specified in the Offered Securities Rules of the DFSA. It must not be delivered to, or relied on by, any other person. The DFSA has no responsibility for reviewing or verifying any documents in connection with Exempt Offers. The DFSA has not approved this prospectus nor taken steps to verify the information set forth herein and has no responsibility for the prospectus. The shares to which this prospectus relates may be illiquid and/or subject to restrictions on their resale. Prospective purchasers of the shares offered should conduct their own due diligence on the shares. If you do not understand the contents of this prospectus you should consult an authorized financial advisor.

Our counsel, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, California, will pass on the validity of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus. The underwriters have been represented by Latham & Watkins LLP, Los Angeles, California.

The financial statements as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 included in this prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act that registers the shares of our common stock to be sold in this offering. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed as part of the registration statement. For further information with respect to us and our common stock, we refer you to the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed as a part of the registration statement. Statements contained in this prospectus concerning the contents of any contract or any other document are not necessarily complete. If a contract or document has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, we refer you to the copy of the contract or document that has been filed. Each statement in this prospectus relating to a contract or document filed as an exhibit is qualified in all respects by the filed exhibit. The reports and other information we file with the SEC can be read and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. Copies of these materials can be obtained at prescribed rates from the SEC's Public Reference Room at such address. You may obtain information regarding the operation of the public reference room by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a web site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

Upon completion of this offering, we will become subject to the reporting and information requirements of the Exchange Act and, as a result, will file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. These periodic reports, proxy statements and other information will be available for inspection and copying at the SEC's public reference room and the web site of the SEC referred to above. We also maintain a website at http://www.legalzoom.com. Upon completion of this offering, you may access our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act with the SEC, free of charge, at our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website shall not be deemed incorporated into and is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which it forms a part.

LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 and the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2012

The two-for-three reverse stock split described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements has not been consummated at July 20, 2012. When it has been consummated, we will be in a position to furnish the following report.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' deficit present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of LegalZoom.com, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for multiple deliverable revenue arrangements in 2010.

Los Angeles, California
April 5, 2012, except for the two-for-three reverse stock split described in Note 2 as to which the date is , 2012."

LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value)

	December 31,

	December 31,						March 31, 2012			Pro Forma March 31, 2012
	2010			2011			March 31, 2012			Pro Forma March 31, 2012
							(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	19,169		$	27,108		$	31,922		$	31,922
Restricted cash		502			—			—
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $53, $214, $261 (unaudited) and $261 (unaudited), respectively		2,163			3,652			5,811			5,811
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,940			3,302			3,665			3,665
Deferred income taxes		—			6,498			6,395			6,395

Total current assets		24,774			40,560			47,793			47,793
Property and equipment, net		10,617			12,211			12,034			12,034
Deferred income taxes		—			430			430			430
Other assets		238			300			2,034			2,034

Total assets	$	35,629		$	53,501		$	62,291		$	62,291

Liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' equity (deficit)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	2,496		$	1,738		$	4,460		$	4,460
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		9,937			19,434			22,534			22,534
Capital lease obligations		19			202			58			58
Deferred revenue		18,227			21,502			24,801			24,801

Total current liabilities		30,679			42,876			51,853			51,853
Deferred revenue, net of current portion		6,979			3,277			2,436			2,436
Deferred rent		2,811			3,864			3,811			3,811
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion		15			—			—			—
Other liabilities		6,004			603			766			766

Total liabilities		46,488			50,620			58,866			58,866

Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)
Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 7,628 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2011 and March 31, 2012 (unaudited); no shares authorized, issued and outstanding pro forma (unaudited); liquidation preference of $57,064 at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 (unaudited)		58,649			62,691			63,699			—
Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 66,180 shares authorized; 20,944, 21,186 and 21,340 shares issued; and 20,764, 21,006 and 21,160 (unaudited) shares outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2011, and March 31, 2012 (unaudited); 36,416 shares outstanding pro forma (unaudited)		21			21			22			37
Treasury stock, at cost; 180 shares at December 31, 2010 and 2011 and March 31, 2012 (unaudited)		(519	)		(519	)		(519	)		(519	)
Additional paid-in capital		202			331			—			63,684
Accumulated deficit		(69,212	)		(59,643	)		(59,777	)		(59,777	)

Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		(69,508	)		(59,810	)		(60,274	)		3,425

Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' equity (deficit)	$	35,629		$	53,501		$	62,291		$	62,291

LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

	Year Ended December 31,									Three Months Ended March 31,

	2009			2010			2011			2011			2012
										(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Revenues	$	103,299		$	120,771		$	156,066		$	38,288		$	46,988
Costs and operating expenses:
Cost of services		53,082			60,643			80,437			20,459			22,847
Sales and marketing		32,673			36,322			41,891			12,388			15,651
Technology and development		4,686			7,509			8,117			1,869			2,071
General and administrative		13,154			20,024			19,343			4,596			6,167

Total costs and operating expenses		103,595			124,498			149,788			39,312			46,736

Income (loss) from operations		(296	)		(3,727	)		6,278			(1,024	)		252
Interest and other expense, net		(33	)		(15	)		(153	)		(51	)		(27	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(329	)		(3,742	)		6,125			(1,075	)		225
Income tax (provision) benefit		(311	)		(282	)		5,998			103			(280	)

Net income (loss)	$	(640	)	$	(4,024	)	$	12,123		$	(972	)	$	(55	)

Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock		(4,035	)		(4,038	)		(4,042	)		(997	)		(1,008	)
Net income attributable to participating securities		—			—			(3,407	)		—			—

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(4,675	)	$	(8,062	)	$	4,674		$	(1,969	)	$	(1,063	)

Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.42	)	$	0.22		$	(0.09	)	$	(0.05	)

Diluted	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.42	)	$	0.19		$	(0.09	)	$	(0.05	)

Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic		18,700			19,360			20,925			20,832			21,088

Diluted		18,700			19,360			24,195			20,832			21,088

Pro forma net income (loss) per share (unaudited):
Basic							$	0.34					$	(0.00	)

Diluted							$	0.31					$	(0.00	)

Pro forma weighted-average common shares outstanding (unaudited):
Basic								36,181						36,344

Diluted								39,451						36,344

LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
(In thousands)

	Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock

					Common Stock							Notes Receivable from Stockholders
					Common Stock				Additional Paid-In Capital						Treasury Stock			Accumulated Deficit			Total Stockholders' Deficit
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-In Capital						Treasury Stock			Accumulated Deficit			Total Stockholders' Deficit
Balance at December 31, 2008		7,628	$	50,576		18,554	$	18	$	—		$	(533	)	$	(519	)	$	(61,933	)	$	(62,967	)
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		—		—		566		1		263			—			—			—			264
Interest on notes receivable from stockholders		—		—		—		—		—			(21	)		—			—			(21	)
Stock-based compensation		—		—		—		—		1,157			—			—			—			1,157
Accretion of preferred stock		—		4,035		—		—		(1,420	)		—			—			(2,615	)		(4,035	)
Net loss		—		—		—		—		—			—			—			(640	)		(640	)

Balance at December 31, 2009		7,628	$	54,611		19,120	$	19	$	—		$	(554	)	$	(519	)	$	(65,188	)	$	(66,242	)
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		—		—		1,644		2		2,881			—			—			—			2,883
Interest on notes receivable from stockholders		—		—		—		—		—			(22	)		—			—			(22	)
Reclassification of non-recourse note receivable from founding third-party consultant		—		—		—		—		39			(39	)		—			—			—
Settlement of non-recourse note receivable from founding third-party consultant for services rendered		—		—		—		—		—			62			—			—			62
Repayment of notes receivable from stockholders		—		—		—		—		—			553			—			—			553
Stock-based compensation		—		—		—		—		1,320			—			—			—			1,320
Accretion of preferred stock		—		4,038		—		—		(4,038	)		—			—			—			(4,038	)
Net loss		—		—		—		—		—			—			—			(4,024	)		(4,024	)

Balance at December 31, 2010		7,628	$	58,649		20,764	$	21	$	202		$	—		$	(519	)	$	(69,212	)	$	(69,508	)
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options		—		—		242		—		336			—			—			—			336
Stock-based compensation		—		—		—		—		950			—			—			—			950
Excess windfall tax benefits from stock-based compensation		—		—		—		—		331			—			—			—			331
Accretion of preferred stock		—		4,042		—		—		(1,488	)		—			—			(2,554	)		(4,042	)
Net income		—		—		—		—		—			—			—			12,123			12,123

Balance at December 31, 2011		7,628	$	62,691		21,006	$	21	$	331		$	—		$	(519	)	$	(59,643	)	$	(59,810	)
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options (unaudited)		—		—		154		1		263			—			—			—			264
Stock-based compensation (unaudited)		—		—		—		—		335			—			—			—			335
Accretion of preferred stock (unaudited)		—		1,008		—		—		(929	)		—			—			(79	)		(1,008	)
Net loss (unaudited)		—		—		—		—		—			—			—			(55	)		(55	)

Balance at March 31, 2012 (unaudited)		7,628	$	63,699		21,160	$	22	$	—		$	—		$	(519	)	$	(59,777	)	$	(60,274	)

	Year Ended December 31,									Three Months Ended March 31,

	2009			2010			2011			2011			2012
										(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	(640	)	$	(4,024	)	$	12,123		$	(972	)	$	(55	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		2,937			3,509			4,562			1,002			1,244
Deferred income taxes		—			—			(6,928	)		—			103
Stock-based compensation		1,137			1,308			944			266			332
Excess windfall tax benefits from stock-based compensation		—			—			(331	)		—			—
Loss on disposal of property and equipment		30			280			94						—
Other		20			93			22			4			4
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(301	)		(834	)		(1,489	)		(2,353	)		(2,159	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,004			(543	)		(289	)		(412	)		(371	)
Other assets		6			(49	)		(74	)		3			4
Accounts payable		(946	)		757			(227	)		1,295			2,624
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		4,261			5,345			4,689			3,893			1,585
Deferred revenue		7,171			(4,867	)		(427	)		665			2,458
Deferred rent		—			513			1,053			296			(54	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		14,679			1,488			13,722			3,687			5,715

Cash flows from investing activities
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash		(501	)		(1	)		502			250			—
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment		—			49			—			—			3
Purchase of property and equipment		(3,983	)		(4,721	)		(6,562	)		(2,131	)		(1,023	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(4,484	)		(4,673	)		(6,060	)		(1,881	)		(1,020	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Repayment of capital lease obligations		(17	)		(19	)		(384	)		(5	)		(145	)
Payment of deferred financing costs		—			(31	)		(6	)		—			—
Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable from stockholders		—			553			—			—			—
Excess windfall tax benefits from stock-based compensation		—			—			331			—			—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		264			2,883			336			146			264

Net cash provided by financing activities		247			3,386			277			141			119

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		10,442			201			7,939			1,947			4,814
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of the period		8,526			18,968			19,169			19,169			27,108

Cash and cash equivalents, at end of the period	$	18,968		$	19,169		$	27,108		$	21,116		$	31,922

Supplemental cash flow data
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	—		$	—		$	15		$	5		$	11
Income taxes		1			110			754			190			126
Non-cash investing and financing activities
Accretion of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock		4,035			4,038			4,042			997			1,008
Stock-based compensation capitalized as software development costs		20			12			6			2			3
Purchase of property and equipment included in accounts payable and accrued expenses		324			1,180			386			1,333			431
Deferred offering costs included in accounts payable and accrued expenses		—			—			—			—			1,737
Acquisition of equipment under capital lease		—			—			491			—			—
Settlement of non-recourse note receivable		—			62			—			—			—
Tenant incentive for purchase of leasehold improvements		—			2,554			—			—			—

LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

LegalZoom.com, Inc. was initially formed as a California corporation in 1999 and reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in 2007. LegalZoom.com, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the "Company") conducts its operations from headquarters located in Glendale, California, and in Austin, Texas and San Francisco, California.

The Company is a provider of services that meet the legal needs of small businesses and consumers in the United States. The Company offers a broad portfolio of interactive legal documents through its online legal platform that customers can tailor to their specific needs. The Company also offers subscription services, including legal plans through which customers can be connected to an experienced attorney licensed in their jurisdiction, registered agent services and unlimited access to the Company's forms library.

A summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the Company in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements is set forth below.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, and include the operations of LegalZoom.com, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

In July 2011, the Company effected a three-for-one stock split of its common stock and a proportional adjustment to the conversion ratio for Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock ("Series A" or "preferred stock").

On July 19, 2012, the board of directors and stockholders of the Company approved a two-for-three reverse stock split of its common stock and a proportional adjustment to the conversion ratio for Series A that will be effective immediately prior to the effectiveness of the registration statement on Form S-1 for the initial public offering of the Company's common stock.

All share, per-share and related information presented in these consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes have been retroactively adjusted, where applicable, to reflect the impact of the stock splits including an adjustment to the preferred stock conversion ratio.

The accompanying interim consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2012, the consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012, the consolidated statement of stockholders' deficit for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and financial information disclosed in these notes to the consolidated financial statements related to the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 are unaudited. These unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of the Company's management, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the Company's statement of financial

position as of March 31, 2012 and its results of operations and its cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012. The results for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.

On January 31, 2012, the Company's board of directors approved the Company to prepare for the filing of an initial public offering of the Company's common stock. Immediately upon the closing of a qualifying initial public offering, all of the preferred stock outstanding will automatically convert into 15,256,000 shares of common stock. The unaudited pro forma balance sheet gives effect to the conversion of the preferred stock to stockholders' equity as of March 31, 2012. Unaudited pro forma basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share for the year ended December 31, 2011 and the three months ended March 31, 2012 has been computed to give effect to the conversion of the preferred stock into common stock, using the if-converted method, as though such conversion had occurred as of January 1, 2011.

The following table sets forth the computation of the Company's pro forma basic and diluted net income per share of common stock (in thousands, except for per share amounts):

	Year Ended December 31, 2011		Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

	(unaudited)		(unaudited)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	4,674	$	(1,063	)
Pro forma adjustment to reverse accretion of preferred stock		4,042		1,008
Pro forma adjustment to reverse income attributable to
preferred stockholders		3,407		—

Net income (loss) used in computing pro forma net income (loss) per share:	$	12,123	$	(55	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic		20,925		21,088
Pro forma adjustment to reflect assumed conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock		15,256		15,256

Weighted average common shares outstanding used in computing basic pro forma net income (loss) per share:		36,181		36,344
Effect of potentially dilutive securities—stock options		3,270		—

Weighted average common shares outstanding used in computing diluted pro forma net income (loss) per share:		39,451		36,344

Pro forma net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	0.34	$	(0.00	)
Diluted	$	0.31	$	(0.00	)

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates estimates which are subject to significant judgment including those related to sales

allowances and credit reserves, the evaluation of revenue recognition criteria, including the determination of standalone value and estimates of the selling price of deliverables in the Company's revenue arrangements, useful lives associated with property and equipment, loss contingencies, valuation allowances related to deferred income taxes and assumptions used to value stock-based awards. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. The Company evaluates its estimates compared to historical experience and trends, which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities.

The Company does not have any components of other comprehensive income (loss) for any period presented, and accordingly, net income (loss) equals comprehensive income (loss).

The Company accounts for fair value measurements in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 820, Fair Value Measurements ("ASC 820"). ASC 820 establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and expands on required disclosures about fair value measurement. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. ASC 820 describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value, which are the following:

In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value. For the periods presented, the Company has no financial assets or liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

The carrying amounts of cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximate fair values because of the short-term nature of these items.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company, at times, maintains cash balances at financial institutions in excess of amounts insured by United States government agencies. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions.

Concentrations of credit risk with respect to revenues are limited due to a large, diverse customer base. No individual customer represented more than 1% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 and for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited).

At December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 (unaudited), there were no individual customer account balances that comprised more than 10% of accounts receivable.

Cash equivalents typically consist of highly liquid investments, including certificates of deposits, with maturities of three months or less when purchased. At December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012, the Company's cash balances totaled $19.2 million, $27.1 million and $31.9 million (unaudited), respectively, and consist entirely of bank account deposits and hence there are no cash equivalents.

During 2009, the Company established a relationship with a financial institution for credit and debit card merchant processing and procurement credit card services. With the establishment of the credit and debit card merchant processing services, the Company was required to maintain $250,000 in an interest-bearing six-month certificate of deposit as collateral against debit card chargebacks or returned e-checks. At December 31, 2010, the certificate of deposit balance was $252,000 and was included in restricted cash. During 2011, the Company changed the financial institution providing merchant processing of credit cards and e-checks resulting in the removal of the requirement to maintain the certificate of deposit by the financial institution.

Similarly, for the procurement credit card services, the Company was required to maintain, in a non-interest bearing account, a balance of $250,000 equivalent to the credit limit on such procurement credit cards, which was included in restricted cash at December 31, 2010. In February 2011, the financial institution removed the requirement to maintain the $250,000 collateral against the available credit limit on the procurement credit cards. There are no restricted cash balances at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 (unaudited).

The Company's accounts receivable balance primarily consists of amounts receivable from (i) the Company's credit and debit card merchant processor, (ii) customer receivables, and (iii) fees due from third-parties for services purchased by the Company's customers from such third-parties. The Company does not obtain collateral or other security related to accounts receivable. Merchant processor receivables, which do not bear interest, arise due to the time taken to clear transactions through external payment networks, which typically ranges between two to five business days, and are recorded net of processing fees. Customer receivables arise from the Company's three-pay plan where the customers have the option to pay the total amount due in three equal payments, with the first payment being due upon placement of the order and the remaining two payments being due 30 and 60 days after the first payment date. Accordingly, the customer receivable balances included in the consolidated balance sheets represent those second- and third-payments due to the Company for which services have been rendered, net of the related sales allowance for charge-back or credits. The sales allowance for three-pay plan receivables is determined based on the Company's best estimate of the amount of charge-backs or credits in its existing accounts receivable and is recorded against revenues as further described in Note 3.

The Company also maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for its receivables from third-party service providers based on its historical collection experience and a review in each period of the status of the then outstanding accounts receivables, with an emphasis on those that are over 90 days past due. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when the Company determines that it is probable the receivable will not be recovered. To date, the allowance for doubtful accounts has not been significant.

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as shown in the table below. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred whereas significant renewals and betterments are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the Company's results of operations.

The Company capitalizes the costs associated with software developed or obtained for internal use when the preliminary project stage is completed and it is determined that the software or significant modification thereto, will provide significantly enhanced capabilities which will be used to perform the function intended. These capitalized costs include external direct cost of services procured in developing or obtaining internal use software and personnel and related benefits, including stock-based compensation for employees who are directly associated with the development of internal use software projects. Capitalization of these costs ceases once the project is substantially complete and the software is ready for its intended purpose. Post-implementation training and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. The Company does not transfer ownership of, or lease its software to its customers or third-parties.

Costs related to development of internal use software that has not yet been placed in service are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in software development costs in progress.

The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets, which consist primarily of property and equipment, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired and the carrying value may not be recoverable. Events or changes in circumstances that may indicate that an asset is impaired include significant decreases in the market value of an asset, significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future results of operations, a change in the extent or manner in which an asset is utilized, significant declines in the estimated fair value of the overall Company for a sustained period, shifts in technology, loss of key management or personnel, changes in the Company's operating model or strategy and competitive forces.

If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable and the expected undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the asset are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss equal to the excess of the asset's carrying value over its fair value is recorded. Fair value is determined based on the present value of estimated expected future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with the risk involved, quoted market prices or appraised values, depending on the nature of the assets. The Company has not recorded any impairment of its long-lived assets for any of the periods presented.

The Company records rent expense for operating leases, some of which have escalating rent payments, over the term of the lease, on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company begins recognition of rent expense on the date of initial possession, which is generally when the Company enters the leased premises and begins to make improvements in preparation for its intended use. Some of the Company's lease arrangements provide for concessions by the landlords, including payments for leasehold improvements and rent-free periods. The Company accounts for the difference between the straight-line rent expense and rent paid as a deferred rent liability.

The Company leases equipment under capital lease arrangements. The assets and liabilities under capital lease are recorded at the lesser of present value of aggregate future minimum lease payments, including estimated bargain purchase options, or the fair value of the asset under lease. Assets under capital lease are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.

The Company recognizes revenues when four basic criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; services have been rendered; the fees are fixed or determinable and collectability is

reasonably assured. The Company considers persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement to be the customer's placement of the order and acceptance of the Company's terms of service. For arrangements with third-party companies related to other revenues, the Company ensures a written contract is in place. The Company's customers generally pay for their orders and subscription services in advance by credit or debit card. The total fees, or the consideration, collected by the Company for its services include, as applicable, expedited services fees, government filing fees and shipping fees. The Company records the total consideration initially as deferred revenues that are then recognized as revenue when the Company meets all of the criteria for revenue recognition. Deferred revenues that the Company will recognize during the succeeding 12 month period from the Company's balance sheet date is recorded as current deferred revenues, and the remaining portion is recorded as non-current at the balance sheet date. On a more limited basis, the Company may offer alternative payment methods to credit cards for certain services. These alternative payment methods include automated clearing house ("ACH") or payment by personal check or money order for registered agent renewals. In October 2010, the Company commenced offering its customers the ability to pay the fees owed to the Company on certain services in three equal monthly payments, or the three-pay plan. One-third of the fees due under the three-pay plan is charged to the customer's debit or credit card, on the date the order is placed, and the second and third payments are charged 30 and 60 days after the first payment date. Where full payment is not received in advance, revenue is only recognized if collectability is reasonably assured assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met. The Company's online platform allows customers to prepare legal documents, schedule consultations with plan attorneys and subscribe to other related services. The Company's customers do not have the rights to the underlying software code of its online platform, accordingly, the Company's arrangements are outside the scope of software revenue recognition rules under ASC 985, Software.

For the Company's legal document preparation services, transaction revenues are recognized when the Company fulfills the service. For time-based, subscription services, such as legal plans, registered agent services or unlimited access to the Company's forms library, the Company recognizes subscription revenues ratably on a straight-line basis over the subscription term for those services, which ranges from a period of 30 days to two years.

Other revenues are recognized when the related performance-based criteria have been met. The Company assesses whether performance criteria have been met on a cost-per-click or cost-per-action basis and whether the fees are fixed or determinable based on a reconciliation of the performance criteria and the payment terms associated with the transaction. The reconciliation of the performance criteria generally includes a comparison of internally tracked performance data to the contractual performance obligation and, when available, to third-party or affiliate provided performance data. These arrangements do not include multiple deliverables.

A significant number of the Company's arrangements include multiple, bundled deliverables, such as the preparation of legal documents combined with related document revision, document storage, 30-day free trial of the Company's registered agent services or its legal plans. The Company therefore recognizes revenues for these arrangements in accordance with FASB ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition—Multiple-Element Arrangements ("ASC 605-25"). ASC 605-25 was updated by Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605)—Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements—a Consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force ("ASU 2009-13").

The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2009-13 on a prospective basis for all arrangements entered into or materially modified after January 1, 2010.

For multiple deliverable revenue arrangements, the Company first assesses whether each deliverable has value to the Company's customer on a standalone basis and performance is considered probable and substantially in its control. The Company's services can be sold both on a standalone basis and as part of

multiple deliverable arrangements. Accordingly, substantially all of the Company's services have standalone value to its customer. Based on that standalone value of the deliverables, the Company allocates its revenues among the separate deliverables in the arrangement, including the bundled free trials, using the relative selling price method hierarchy established in ASU 2009-13. This hierarchy requires the selling price of each deliverable in a multiple deliverable revenue arrangement to be based on, in descending order: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence, or VSOE, (ii) third-party evidence of selling price, or TPE, or (iii) management's best estimated selling price, or BESP.

The Company establishes VSOE for a majority of its services based on the price the Company charges when the deliverable is sold separately. In determining VSOE, the Company requires that a substantial majority of the Company's selling prices for its services to fall within a reasonably narrow pricing range, and the Company then establishes VSOE based on the mid-point of the range for those services. This requires significant management judgment, including as to how the Company groups similar services, the time period analyzed for assessing transactions and the volume of similar transactions available to the Company in the relevant time period.

When the Company cannot establish VSOE, the Company applies its judgment with respect to whether the Company can establish TPE based on competitor prices for similar deliverables that are sold separately. The Company believes its strategy differs from that of its peers, and its services contain a significant level of differentiation such that comparable pricing of the Company's services cannot be obtained. The Company's competitors do not sell services similar to its services on a standalone basis, and the Company therefore is unable to reliably determine what similar competitor services' selling prices are on a stand-alone basis. As a result, the Company has been unable to establish selling price based on TPE.

When the Company cannot establish VSOE or TPE, the Company applies its judgment to determine BESP. The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which the Company would transact a sale if the service were sold on a stand-alone basis. The determination of BESP requires the Company to make significant estimates and judgments and the Company considers numerous factors in this determination, including the nature of the deliverables, market conditions and the Company's competitive landscape, internal costs and its pricing and discounting practices. The Company's determination of BESP is made through consultation with and formal approval by its senior management. The Company updates its estimates of both VSOE and BESP on an ongoing basis as events and as circumstances may require. Because the Company can establish VSOE for substantially all of its services, use of BESP estimate for revenue recognition is limited to document revision and document storage services.

The Company is unable to determine VSOE or TPE for document revision and document storage services, which the Company bundles with certain of its consumer services. Accordingly, as of January 1, 2010, the selling prices of these document revision and document storage services are determined based on BESP, and the Company recognizes revenues from these services based on the relative selling price of the deliverables in the arrangement. The Company's adoption of ASU 2009-13 resulted in the Company recognizing $4.7 million of transaction revenues in 2010 that the Company would not have otherwise recognized during that year.

Prior to January 1, 2010, the Company considered document revision and document storage services that the Company bundles with other consumer services to be a single unit of accounting and the total fees received from those arrangements were recognized as transaction revenues ratably on a straight-line basis over the service term. Prior to August 2009, the Company offered document revision and document storage services with a term of five years and, accordingly, the deferred revenues will be recognized as transaction revenues through August 2014. Beginning in August 2009, the Company sold these services only on a one year service term. At December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012, the Company's non-current deferred revenues balances of $7.0 million, $3.3 million and $2.4 million

(unaudited), respectively, included in the Company's consolidated balance sheets primarily consist of document revision and document storage services.

The Company's arrangements do not include contractual provisions for cancellations or terminations. As a business practice, the Company provides that if its customers are not fully satisfied with the services or support and they notify the Company within a limited period of time after the purchase, the Company will attempt to resolve the matter, offer a credit that can be used for future services or provide a refund, excluding third-party fees. Revenues are recognized net of promotional discounts and estimated sales allowances and credit reserves related to credit or debit card charge-backs, sales credits and refunds. For completed services where the customers have elected the three-pay plan, the Company records a sales allowance for estimated charge backs, sales credits and collection losses for the second and third payment receivable amounts. The sales allowance is recorded against the customer receivables balance. For completed and paid services, the Company records sales and credit reserves based on its estimate of refunds or credits. The sales and credit reserves are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities. The sales allowance and the sales and credit reserves are made at the time of revenue recognition based on the Company's historical experience, activity occurring after the balance sheet date and other factors. The Company has established a sufficient history of estimating refunds, charge backs, write offs and credits, given the large number of homogeneous transactions. The majority of the Company's allowances and reserves are known within the time period of its financial reporting cycle. The estimated provision for sales allowances and reserves has varied from actual results within ranges consistent with management's expectations. If actual sales allowances, credit reserves and promotional discounts are greater than estimated by management, revenues and operating results would be negatively impacted.

The Company evaluates the criteria as prescribed by FASB ASC 605-45, Principal Agent Considerations, in order to determine whether the Company can recognize revenues gross as a principal or net as an agent. The Company records revenues on a gross basis when the Company is the primary obligor in the arrangement and therefore principally responsible for the fulfillment of the services. The determination of whether the Company is the principal or agent requires it to evaluate a number of indicators, including which party, as applicable, in the arrangement:

When forming the Company's conclusion on whether the Company is the principal or agent in an arrangement and whether to present revenues gross or net, the Company weighs the above factors, and places more weight on the first factor, or primary obligor, followed by whether the Company has latitude in establishing the sales price and whether the Company performs part of the service.

In arrangements in which the Company is the primary obligor and the indicators are weighted towards the Company acting as a principal, the Company records as revenues the amounts the Company has billed

to its customer, and the Company records the related costs the Company has incurred in fulfilling the Company's services. The Company is the primary obligor in substantially all of its legal document preparation and registered agent services.

In arrangements in which the Company is not the primary obligor and the indicators are more weighted towards the Company acting as the agent in the arrangement, the Company records revenues on a net basis, which is equal to the amount billed to its customer, net of the fee payable to the primary obligor, which is another third party that is primarily responsible for performing the services for the customer. Because the Company is not a law firm and cannot provide legal advice, the participating independent law firms in the Company's legal plans have the primary service obligation to provide attorney consultations to the Company's customers, for which the Company pays the law firms a monthly fee. Therefore, the Company recognizes revenues net as an agent for subscriptions to the Company's legal plans. The Company also recognized revenues net as an agent for registered agent services prior to March 2010. Before March 2010, the Company contracted with third-party service providers to perform substantially all registered agent services on the Company's behalf and accordingly, the Company recorded the amount received from the customer net of the fee payable to the service provider.

The Company has one operating segment, providing legal document preparation and related subscription services. The Company's Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM"), the Chief Executive Officer, manages the Company's operations based on consolidated financial information for purposes of evaluating financial performance and allocating resources. The CODM reviews separate revenue information for its transaction and subscription services. All other financial information is reviewed by the CODM on a consolidated basis. All of the Company's principal operations, decision-making functions and assets are located in the United States. Assets and revenues generated outside of the United States are not material for any of the periods presented.

Revenues derived from the Company's transaction and subscription services are as follows (in thousands):

Cost of services include all costs of providing and fulfilling the Company's services. Cost of services primarily include government filing fees; costs of fulfillment, customer care and inbound sales personnel and related benefits, including stock-based compensation, and costs of independent contractors for document preparation; telecommunications and data center costs, including depreciation and amortization of network computers, equipment and internal use software; printing, shipping and courier charges; credit and debit card fees; allocated overhead; legal document kit expenses; and sales and use taxes. The Company defers direct and incremental costs primarily related to government filing fees incurred prior to the associated service meeting the criteria for revenue recognition. The deferred cost of services is

recognized as cost of services in the same period in the related revenue is recognized. At December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012, there were $0.9 million, $0.8 million and $1.2 million (unaudited), respectively, of deferred cost of service included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Sales and marketing expenses are comprised of customer acquisition media, consisting primarily of search engine marketing, television and radio; compensation and related benefits, including stock-based compensation, for marketing and outbound sales personnel; media production; public relations and other promotional activities; general business development activities; and allocated overhead. Marketing and advertising costs to promote the Company's products and services are expensed in the period incurred. Media production costs are expensed the first time the advertisement is aired. Advertising expenses were $29.6 million, $32.6 million, and $36.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively, and $11.2 million (unaudited) and $13.4 million (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively, are included in sales and marketing on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Technology and development expenses consist primarily of personnel costs and related benefits, including stock-based compensation, and expenses for outside consultants. These expenses include allocated overhead and costs incurred in the development, implementation, amortization and maintenance of internal use software, including our website, online legal platform and related infrastructure. Technology and development costs are expensed as incurred, except to the extent that such costs are associated with internal use of software or website development costs that qualify for capitalization as previously described under Capitalized Software Costs.

The Company's general and administrative expenses relate primarily to compensation and related benefits, including stock-based compensation, for executive and corporate personnel; professional and consulting fees; allocated overhead; and legal loss contingencies.

The Company applies the two-class method for calculating basic earnings per share. Under the two-class method, net income is reduced by accretion of preferred stock and the residual amount is allocated between common stock and other participating securities based on their participation rights. Participating securities are comprised of preferred stock which participate in dividends, if declared, by the Company. Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, net of unvested restricted stock subject to repurchase by the Company, if any, during the period. For periods in which the Company reported a net loss, the participating securities are not contractually obligated to share in the losses of the Company, and accordingly, no losses have been allocated to the participating securities. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, adjusted for the effects of potentially dilutive common stock, which are comprised of stock options, using the treasury-stock method, and convertible preferred stock, using the if-converted method. Because the Company reported losses for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2012, all potentially dilutive common stock are antidilutive for those periods.

The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, and the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012:

	Year Ended December 31,									Three Months Ended March 31,

	2009			2010			2011			2011			2012
										(unaudited)			(unaudited)
	(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator
Net income (loss)	$	(640	)	$	(4,024	)	$	12,123		$	(972	)	$	(55	)
Accretion of preferred stock		(4,035	)		(4,038	)		(4,042	)		(997	)		(1,008	)
Less amount attributable to participating securities		—			—			(3,407	)		—			—

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders—basic and diluted	$	(4,675	)	$	(8,062	)	$	4,674		$	(1,969	)	$	(1,063	)

Denominator
Weighted average common stock—basic		18,700			19,360			20,925			20,832			21,088
Effect of potentially dilutive securities—stock options and restricted stock units		—			—			3,270			—			—

Weighted-average common stock—diluted		18,700			19,360			24,195			20,832			21,088

Earnings per share
Basic	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.42	)	$	0.22		$	(0.09	)	$	(0.05	)
Diluted	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.42	)	$	0.19		$	(0.09	)	$	(0.05	)

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2011 has been allocated to the common stock and participating preferred stock based on their respective rights to share in dividends.

The following table presents the number of anti-dilutive shares excluded from the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders for years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, and for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 (in thousands):

The Company recognizes compensation expense related to employee option grants and restricted stock units in accordance with FASB ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation ("ASC 718").

The Company estimates the fair value of employee stock-based payment awards on the grant-date and recognizes the resulting fair value, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model for estimating the fair value of options granted under the Company's stock option plans. The fair value of restricted stock units is determined based on the value of the underlying common stock. The Company has elected to treat stock-based payment awards with graded vesting schedules and time-based service conditions as a single award and recognizes stock-based compensation on a straight-line basis, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period.

Compensation expense for non-employee stock-based awards is recognized in accordance with ASC 718 and FASB ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees ("ASC 505-50"). Stock option awards issued to non-employees are accounted for at fair value using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Management believes that the fair value of the stock options is more reliably measured than the fair value of services received. The Company records compensation expense based on the then-current fair values of the stock options at each financial reporting date. Compensation recorded during the service period is adjusted in subsequent periods for changes in the stock options' fair value until the earlier of the date at which the non-employee's performance is complete or a performance commitment is reached, which is generally when the stock option award vests. There were no grants of stock-based awards to non-employees for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010. In September 2011 and January 2012, the Company granted options to purchase 43,332 and 23,333 (unaudited) shares, respectively, of the Company's common stock to certain non-employees for advisory services. Compensation expense for non-employee grants is recorded on a straight-line basis in the consolidated statements of operations and was insignificant for the year ended December 31, 2011 and the three months ended March 31, 2012 (unaudited).

The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the Company to make certain assumptions including the fair value of the underlying common stock, the expected term, the expected volatility, the risk-free interest rate and the dividend yield.

The fair value of the shares of common stock underlying the stock options has historically been determined by the Board of Directors. Because there has been no public market for the Company's common stock, the Board of Directors has determined the fair value of the common stock at the time of the grant of options and restricted stock units by considering a number of objective and subjective factors including valuation of comparable companies, sales of common stock to unrelated third parties, operating and financial performance and general and industry-specific economic outlook, amongst other factors. The fair value of the underlying common stock will be determined by the Board of Directors until such time as the Company's common stock is listed on an established stock exchange or national market system. The fair value was determined in accordance with applicable elements of the practice aid issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants titled Valuation of Privately Held Company Equity Securities Issued As Compensation.

The expected term of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period that the stock options are expected to remain outstanding. The expected term of options granted is calculated based upon actual historical exercise and post-vesting cancellations, adjusted for expected future exercise behavior.

Because the Company's common stock has no publicly traded history, the Company estimates the expected volatility of the awards from the historical volatility of selected public companies within the Internet and media industry with comparable characteristics to the Company, including similarity in size, lines of business, market capitalization, revenue and financial leverage. The Company determined the

expected volatility assumption using the frequency of daily historical prices of comparable public company's common stock for a period equal to the expected term of the options. The Company periodically assesses the comparable companies and other relevant factors used to measure expected volatility for future stock option grants.

The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates on the United States government securities appropriate for the expected term of the Company's employee stock options.

The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company's history and expectation of dividend payouts. The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its common stock, and the Company does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

The assumptions that were used to calculate the grant date fair value of the Company's employee and non-employee stock option grants for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 and the three months ended March 31, 2012 were as follows.

Stock-based compensation expense is recognized based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest, and as a result, the amount has been reduced by estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures are estimated based on the Company's historical experience and future expectations.

The determination of stock-based compensation is inherently uncertain and subjective and involves the application of valuation models and assumptions requiring the use of judgment. If the Company had made different assumptions, its stock-based compensation expense, and its net income (loss) for years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 and the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012, may have been significantly different.

As the Series A is redeemable at the option of the holder or in the case of events outside the control of the Company, the Company has presented the preferred stock outside of stockholders' deficit in the mezzanine section of the December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 (unaudited) consolidated balance sheets.

The Company accretes the carrying value of the preferred stock to the redemption value over the period to the earliest redemption date using the effective interest method. Accretion is recorded as a charge against retained earnings, or in the absence of retained earnings by charges against additional paid-in capital until fully depleted, then ultimately against accumulated deficit.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company must also make judgments in evaluating

whether deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. To the extent that it believes that recovery is not likely, the Company establishes a valuation allowance. The carrying value of the Company's net deferred tax assets is based on whether it is more likely than not that the Company will generate sufficient future taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax assets which the Company does not believe meet the "more likely than not" criteria. The Company's judgments regarding future taxable income may change over time due to changes in market conditions, changes in tax laws, tax planning strategies or other factors. If the Company's assumptions and consequently its estimates change in the future, the valuation allowance may be increased or decreased, resulting in an increase or decrease, which may be material, in the income tax (provision) benefit and the related impact on the Company's reported net income (loss).

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB's guidance on Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes on January 1, 2007. This guidance clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for the accounting of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The guidance contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount, which is more than likely of being realized upon and effectively settled. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating its tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments and which may not accurately forecast actual outcomes. The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax provision (benefit) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

In 2011, the FASB issued new accounting guidance that amends some fair value measurement principles and disclosure requirements. The new guidance states that the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise are only relevant when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets and prohibits the grouping of financial instruments for purposes of determining their fair values when the unit of account is specified in other guidance. The adoption of this accounting guidance during the three months ended March 31, 2012 did not have any impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

The sales allowance activity for the three-pay plan receivables was as follows (in thousands):

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

At December 31, 2010, the accrued legal settlement of $5.4 million was included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet (see Note 6).

At December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 accumulated amortization in connection with internally developed and purchased software costs was $4.0 million, $6.1 million and $6.6 million (unaudited), respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, and the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012, the Company recorded amortization expense of $1.2 million, $2.0 million, $2.1 million, $0.5 million (unaudited) and $0.5 million (unaudited), respectively, in connection with these costs.

Total depreciation and amortization expense recorded was allocated as follows on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):

On October 31, 2008, the Company entered into a revolving line of credit facility with a financial institution and was eligible to borrow up to $5 million (the "Line of Credit"). The Line of Credit agreement set limitations on the Company's ability to pay dividends and to incur additional credit obligations or indebtedness. On October 29, 2010, the Line of Credit was amended to increase the term of the credit agreement by two years and also increased the Company's ability to borrow funds from the financial institution from $5 million to $10 million.

The Line of Credit may be used to fund the general working capital requirements, if required, and any principal amounts drawn would be due up to 180 days from the date of borrowing. Borrowings under the Line of Credit are collateralized by substantially all assets of the Company. The Line of Credit expires on October 31, 2012.

The Line of Credit bears interest at a LIBOR- or prime-based interest rate, which the Company can select at the time of borrowing, plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin is dependent on the Company's Leverage Ratio, calculated contractually using amounts outstanding, if any, divided by a trailing twelve-month earnings of the Company, excluding interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. For LIBOR- or prime-based advances, if the Leverage Ratio is less than or equal to 2:1, the applicable margin would be 3.5% or 1%, and if the Leverage Ratio exceeds 2:1, the applicable margin would be 5% or 2.5%, respectively.

Any LIBOR-based advances must be at least $500,000 and LIBOR rate cannot be less than 1% per annum, before the applicable margin. There are no minimum advance requirements under the prime-based borrowing and the interest rate, if elected, cannot be less than the sum of the LIBOR rate plus 2.5% per annum, before the applicable margin. At December 31, 2011, the 30-day, LIBOR-interest rate was 0.28% and the prime interest rate was 3.25%, subject to the minimums described above, as applicable.

The Company is obligated to pay an unused line fee equal to 0.20% per annum of the average unused portion of the Line of Credit, payable in quarterly installments on the last day of each quarter. Each quarterly installment is calculated based on the average unused portion of the Line of Credit during such fiscal quarter.

All direct financing costs incurred related to the Line of Credit have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the Line of Credit using the interest method and such amounts are not material for any period presented.

The Line of Credit requires immediate repayment of amounts outstanding upon an event of default, as defined in the agreement, which includes events such as a payment default, a covenant default or the occurrence of a material adverse change, as defined in the agreement. At December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 (unaudited), the Company had no amounts outstanding or any letters of credit backed by the Line of Credit.

The Company conducts its operations from leased facilities in various locations. At December 31, 2011, the Company had various non-cancellable operating and capital leases for office space and computer equipment, respectively which expire between August 2013 through January 2021.

Future minimum payments under operating and capital leases are as follows (in thousands):

The Company recorded rent expense of $1.6 million, $2.6 million, and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, and $0.5 million (unaudited) and $0.6 million (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

The Company uses a variety of mediums to advertise its services, including search engine marketing, television and radio. At December 31, 2011, the Company had non-cancellable minimum advertising and media commitments for future advertising spots of $18.1 million, substantially all of which will be paid during 2012. The Company also has a non-cancelable license agreement with a technology vendor which requires the Company to pay $1.5 million over a three-year period for utilization of the vendor's web-based application.

The Company was named a defendant in two purported class action lawsuits filed in California state court on September 15, 2009 and May 27, 2010, alleging primarily that the Company failed to comply with the California Legal Document Assistant Act, engaged in unfair business practices and made misrepresentations in the Company's business operations (collectively, "Matter A"). Between them, the complaints sought to have all contracts between the Company and its customers in the prior four years declared void and demanded a return of all the revenues generated from these customers plus punitive damages, penalties and injunctive relief.

The Company denied and continues to deny all of the allegations and claims asserted in the lawsuits, including, but not limited to, any allegation that the plaintiffs have suffered any harm or damages. In June 2011, the Company, without admitting liability, and to avoid additional legal costs to defend these matters, agreed to a settlement agreement of the May 27, 2010 action to resolve the claims in both of these cases. ("Matter A Settlement") A fairness hearing was held on this matter on April 5, 2012, and the court issued an order granting final approval of the Matter A settlement on April 18, 2012. The plaintiff from the September 15, 2009 action has filed a notice of appeal of the court's denial of his motion to intervene. The plaintiff from the September 15, 2009 action and additional plaintiffs have filed notices of appeal of the court's order and judgment.

The Matter A Settlement includes a settlement class of all customers residing in the United States who purchased certain services from the Company from September 15, 2005 through June 16, 2011 ("Matter A class members"). The key terms of the settlement obligate the Company to pay plaintiff attorney fees and expenses not to exceed $2.2 million; in the states where the Company sells legal plans, for the Company to provide the class members who file a valid and timely claim, a sixty-day free subscription service to those legal plans (an "in-kind services award"); in the states where the Company does not sell legal plans, to pay the class members a cash award of up to $75 per claimant, the aggregate for this category not to exceed $150,000; in lieu of the in-kind services award, for class members who requested but did not receive a refund for the purchase price of the legal document prepared through the Company, and have not already successfully used the document for its intended purpose, the Company will provide a cash award of up to $100 per claimant, the aggregate for this category not to exceed $250,000. Third-party administrative costs of the settlement have been estimated to be approximately $250,000.

The Company accrued the estimated settlement of $2.9 million in the December 31, 2010 financial statements that had not been issued as of the date of the settlement agreement. The $2.9 million accrual, recorded in non-current liabilities as of December 31, 2010 because the payment of the amount was not expected to occur within twelve months of that date, is comprised of plaintiff legal fees and expenses of $2.2 million, the maximum $150,000 to class members who reside in states where the Company does not sell legal plans, an estimated liability of $250,000 for in-kind services awards, and $250,000 for administration costs.

The $2.9 million legal settlement accrual was also recorded as a reduction of revenues of $0.2 million and a charge to general and administrative expenses of $2.7 million in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2010. The reduction of revenues represents estimated refunds to claimants of previously recorded sales amounts.

The Matter A deadline for class members to submit a valid claim to participate in the settlement was May 15, 2012. Based on the claims received by the settlement administrator through the May 15, 2012 submission deadline, the Company has not adjusted the $2.9 million estimated accrued legal settlement liability during the three months ended March 31, 2012. However, the settlement administrator continues to process late claims and/or corrections to incomplete claims, the finalization of which the Company believes will not significantly impact the amount accrued to settle this Matter A.

The Company expenses legal fees and costs for defending legal proceedings as incurred.

On December 17, 2009, a statewide class action lawsuit was filed against the Company in Missouri state court, alleging that we were engaged in the unauthorized practice of law and violated the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act ("Matter B"). The complaint was later amended on January 15, 2010 to add additional plaintiffs. The complaint sought damages of five years of fees charged to Missouri customers with the fees from the two years immediately preceding the complaint trebled and an injunction to enjoin the Company from continued operation in Missouri. The Company subsequently removed the case to federal court in Missouri.

The Company has denied and continues to deny all of the allegations and claims asserted in the lawsuit, including, but not limited to, any allegation that the plaintiffs have suffered any harm or damages. The Company does not admit liability, but agreed to settle the cases to avoid the ongoing cost, expense and time required to defend Matter B. In August 2011, the parties reached agreement on the material terms of a settlement ("Matter B Settlement"). The court held a fairness hearing on April 13, 2012 and issued a final approval order and dismissal with prejudice on April 30, 2012.

The Matter B Settlement includes a settlement class of all customers residing in the State of Missouri who purchased services from the Company from December 18, 2004 through May 20, 2011 ("Matter B class members"). The key terms of the settlement obligate the Company to pay a maximum of $1.9 million to the plaintiffs' attorneys for their fees and expenses plus amounts to be paid to Matter B class members in cash, on a claims-made basis, to be administered by a Claims Administrator. Third-party administrative costs of the settlement have been estimated by the Company to be approximately $75,000.

The Company had accrued the estimated settlement of $2.5 million in the December 31, 2010 financial statements that had not been issued as of the date of the settlement agreement. The $2.5 million accrual, recorded in non-current liabilities as of December 31, 2010 because the payment of the amount was not expected to occur within twelve months of that date, is comprised of the capped plaintiffs' attorneys' fees and expenses of $1.9 million plus an estimated $0.6 million payment to the Matter B class members.

The $2.5 million legal settlement accrual was also recorded as a reduction of revenues of $0.6 million and a charge to general and administrative expenses of $1.9 million in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2010. The reduction of revenues represents estimated cash refunds to Matter B claimants of previously recorded sales amounts.

The Matter B deadline for class members to submit a valid claim to participate in the settlement was May 14, 2012, and based on claims received by the settlement administrator through that date, the Company increased its accrued settlement liability by $0.2 million (unaudited) to $2.7 million (unaudited), which is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2012. The $0.2 million (unaudited) increase from the original estimate was recorded as a reduction of revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2012, representing cash refunds to Matter B claimants of previously recorded sales amounts. The settlement administrator continues to process late claims and/or corrections to incomplete claims, the finalization of which the Company believes will not significantly impact the amount accrued to settle this Matter B.

The maximum settlement for Matters A and B, assuming all eligible claimants made a valid claim, was estimated to be $16 million. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had reasonably estimated the collective range of aggregate probable losses for Matters A and B to be between approximately $5.4 million and $7 million and had accrued the low end of the range as no other amount within this range was a better estimate than any other amount.

Based on the claims received through the respective aforementioned claims submission deadlines and processed to date, the Company has reasonably estimated the collective aggregate probable losses for Matters A and B to be approximately $5.6 million (unaudited) which is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities as of March 31, 2012. The ultimate costs of these two settlements are dependent on a number of factors, including the resolution of any appeals of the Matter A settlement, and actual claims made by, and the resulting payments to, the class members. Any difference between the amount accrued and the ultimate cost of the settlements will be recognized as an additional or lower expense or revenue in the period in which the final settlement is approved and the claims made by the plaintiffs are finalized. There is at least a reasonable possibility that the Company may incur an additional loss in excess of the amount accrued at March 31, 2012. The Company is unable to estimate the amount of additional loss or range of additional loss, if any, relating to these Matters. If the actual payments for the settlements are materially higher than the amount estimated by the Company, this difference could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition.

On June 10, 2011, a purported quo warranto action was filed against the Company in Alabama state court by the DeKalb County Bar Association. The complaint generally alleges that the Company engages in the unauthorized practice of law in Alabama and requests injunctive relief, not damages. The Company has denied and continues to deny all of the allegations and claims asserted in the lawsuit, including, but not limited to, any allegation that the plaintiffs have suffered any harm or damages. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims and intends to vigorously defend this lawsuit. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter. Since no monetary damages are being sought by plaintiff, the Company does not reasonably believe that it has incurred any financial loss and therefore has not recorded any loss in the accompanying consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2012 (unaudited) for this matter.

On July 19, 2012, the Company prevailed on a motion to dismiss a purported statewide class action filed on October 27, 2011, in federal court in Ohio, alleging that the Company engages in the unauthorized practice of law and violates the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act through its transaction business. The complaint sought disgorgement of revenue, among other remedies. The complaint did not state any dollar amounts being sought. The Company denied and continues to deny all of the allegations and claims asserted in the lawsuit, including, but not limited to, any allegation that the plaintiffs have suffered any harm or damages. Since the Company prevailed on the motion to dismiss, the Company does not reasonably believe that it has incurred any financial loss and therefore has not recorded any loss in the accompanying consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2012 (unaudited) for this matter.

On January 25, 2012, a purported class action complaint was filed against the Company in Arkansas state court, generally alleging that the Company engages in unauthorized practice of law constituting violation of the Arkansas deceptive trade practices act and unjust enrichment. The complaint seeks a refund of all monies paid to the Company and punitive damages, among other remedies. The complaint does not state any dollar amounts being sought. The Company has denied and continues to deny all of the allegations and claims asserted in the lawsuit, including, but not limited to, any allegation that the plaintiffs have suffered any harm or damages. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims and intends to vigorously defend this lawsuit. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter. There is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss may have been incurred for this contingency, however, the Company has not recorded any loss or accrual in the accompanying consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2012 (unaudited) for this matter as the amount of loss, if any, is not probable and estimable. The Company is unable to estimate the possible loss or a range of loss, if any, relating to this matter.

On February 17, 2012, a complaint was filed against the Company in South Carolina state court, generally alleging that the Company engages in the unauthorized practice of law through its transaction model. The complaint requests declaratory relief, injunctive relief and disgorgement of revenues, among other measures. The complaint does not state any dollar amounts being sought. The Company has denied and continues to deny all of the allegations and claims asserted in the lawsuit, including, but not limited to, any allegation that the plaintiffs have suffered any harm or damages. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims and intends to vigorously defend this lawsuit. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter. There is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss may have been incurred for this contingency, however, the Company has not recorded any loss or accrual in the accompanying consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2012 (unaudited) for this matter as the amount of loss, if any, is not probable and estimable. The Company is unable to estimate the possible loss or a range of loss, if any, relating to this matter.

If the matters noted above are not resolved in the Company's favor, the losses arising from the results of litigation or settlements may have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition.

The Company filed a complaint on September 30, 2011 in Raleigh, North Carolina against the North Carolina State Bar. The suit brought by the Company requests a declaration that LegalZoom.com Inc.'s self-help services are lawful and requiring the registration of the Company's subscription legal plans. The Company cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

The Company is involved in both active and inactive, state administrative inquiries relating to the unauthorized practice of law. Because these are inquiries and no claims have been alleged or asserted against the Company, the Company cannot predict the outcome of these inquiries or whether these matters will even turn into litigation or any outcome of such litigation.

From time to time, the Company may become subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Other than described above, the Company is not currently a party to any material legal proceedings, nor is the Company aware of any pending or threatened litigation that would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results, cash flows or financial condition should such litigation be resolved unfavorably.

The Company has entered into employment contracts with certain employees and officers. All of the contracts are under the terms of at-will employment. However, under the provisions of the contracts, the Company may be required to incur severance obligations for matters relating to changes in control, as defined, and involuntary terminations. At December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012, total potential severance obligations in connection with the termination of employment contracts approximated $1.6 million and $1.9 million (unaudited), respectively. The Company has an obligation to pay one of its named officers a cash bonus of $100,000 and accelerate vesting by one year of his then-unvested stock options that would have otherwise vested monthly during that same 12-month period upon the completion of an initial public offering.

In February 2010, the Company received a cash incentive payment of $0.5 million from the State of Texas in connection with the Company's opening of its office in Austin, Texas. The cash incentive, among other things, requires the Company to hire a contractually determined number of eligible employees who reside and work in the state beginning in 2010 and annually thorough 2017 ("incentive period"). This incentive contract is subject to annual compliance audits by the State of Texas. Shortfalls in the number of required new hires, if any, may result in the State penalizing the Company over the incentive period and such penalties over the incentive period cannot in the aggregate exceed the original $0.5 million payment made by the State. Although the Company does not expect to pay back this amount entirely based on its expected hiring in the State, it is also unable to estimate how much of the incentive the Company will retain, if any, since the Company can potentially end up paying back the entire incentive payment over the incentive period if it is unable to meet and maintain contractual hiring requirements. Accordingly, the Company has recorded $0.4 million of the incentive payment as a noncurrent liability and $0.1 million as a current liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 (unaudited) the current amount representing the estimated expected amount to be paid back to the state in the next twelve months.

Indemnification provisions in our third-party service provider agreements provide that the Company will indemnify, hold harmless, and reimburse the indemnified parties on a case-by-case basis for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified parties in connection with any claim by any third party as a result of the Company's website, advertising, marketing, payment processing, collection or customer service activities. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is undeterminable. The Company has never paid a claim, nor has the Company been sued in connection with these indemnification provisions. At December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2012 (unaudited), the Company has not accrued a liability for these guarantees, because the likelihood of incurring a payment obligation in connection with these guarantees is not probable.

On February 9, 2007, the Company issued 7,628,000 shares of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock at $5.98471 per share for total gross proceeds of $45.7 million less direct issuance costs of $2.7 million. The Company used the proceeds of this issuance to redeem previously issued securities.

At December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 (unaudited), the Company is authorized to issue 66,180,000 and 7,628,000 shares of common stock and Series A, respectively. The Series A has the following rights and preferences:

The holders of Series A are entitled to receive non-cumulative dividends when and if declared by the Board of Directors. There is no stated dividend rate on the Series A. The Company cannot declare any dividends on any shares of capital stock unless the holders of the Series A then outstanding first receive a dividend on each outstanding share of Series A in an amount at least equal to (i) in the case of a dividend on common stock or any class or series that is convertible into common stock, that dividend per share of Series A as would equal the product of (A) the dividend payable on each share of such class or series determined as if all such shares of such class or series had been converted into common stock and (B) the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of a share of Series A or (ii) in the case of a dividend on any class or series that is not convertible into common stock, at a rate per share of Series A determined by dividing the amount of the dividend payable on each share of such class or series of capital stock by the original issuance price of such class or series of capital stock and multiplying such fraction by an amount equal to $5.98471 per share. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 and the three months ended March 31, 2012 (unaudited), no dividends have been declared.

Each share of the Series A is convertible any time, at the option of the holder, into two shares of common stock. All shares of Series A will automatically convert upon the earlier of (i) immediately prior to the closing of the sale of shares of common stock to the public at a price of at least $9.00 per share, in a firm commitment underwritten public offering pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 with at least $50 million of gross proceeds to the Company and with respect to which the common stock is listed for trading on either the New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ National Market or (ii) a date specified by the vote of the holders of at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series A.

The holders of the Series A are entitled to request that the Company redeem their shares on or after February 9, 2014, which is the date of earliest possible redemption. If the Series A shareholders request redemption, the Company can deny such request. However, in such event, the Series A have certain rights to take control of the Company's Board of Directors and approve such redemption. The redemption amount at February 9, 2014 is an amount per share in cash equal to (i) $5.98471, plus (ii) $0.4788, per annum, accruing on a daily basis, or a total of $71.2 million.

In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, including a merger or consolidation, as defined, the holders of shares of Series A then outstanding are entitled to be paid out of the assets available for distribution to its shareholders before any payment will be made to the holders of common stock or any other class or series of stock ranking on liquidation junior to the Series A by reason of their ownership thereof, an amount per share of Series A equal to the Series A original issue price of $5.98471 multiplied by 1.25 (the "Base Liquidation Amount"), plus any dividends declared but unpaid thereon. If upon liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, the assets available for distribution to its shareholders are insufficient to pay the holders of shares of Series A the full aforesaid preferential amount to which they are entitled, the holders of shares of Series A will share ratably in any distribution of the remaining assets available for distribution in proportion to the respective amounts, which would otherwise be payable in respect of the shares of Series A held by them upon such distribution if all amounts payable on or with respect to such shares were paid in full.

After the payment of all preferential amounts required to be paid to the holders of Series A, the remaining assets available for distribution to the Company's shareholders will be distributed among the holders of the shares of Series A and common stock, pro rata based on the number of shares held by each such holder, treating for this purpose all such securities as if they had been converted to common stock immediately prior to such dissolution, liquidation or winding up of the Company; provided, however, that if and to the extent that the aggregate per share amount to be distributed to the holders of Series A would exceed the Series A original issue price of $5.98471 multiplied by two, the Base Liquidation Amount will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis by an amount equal to such excess amount; provided that in no event will the Base Liquidation Amount be reduced below zero.

Each holder of outstanding shares of Series A is entitled to cast the number of votes equal to the number of whole shares of common stock into, which the shares of Series A held by such holder are convertible as of the record date for determining shareholders entitled to vote on such matter. Holders of Series A will vote together with the holders of common stock as a single class.

As long as there are 2,542,667 shares of Series A outstanding, the Company will not: Amend, alter or repeal any provision of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation or the Company's By-laws in a manner that adversely affects that rights, preferences, privileges and other restrictions of the Series A; increase or decrease the number of authorized shares of Series A; authorize or enter into any transaction or series of related transactions (i) for the sale, exclusive license or other disposition of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company, (ii) for the acquisition of any equity interests or all or substantially all of the assets of another entity, including by merger, in each case, where the fair market value of the consideration paid or issued by the Company in connection with the transaction exceeds $5,000,000, (iii) for the merger, consolidation or other reorganization with or into another entity, (iv) for the voluntary dissolution or

liquidation of the Company, or (iv) otherwise constituting a change of control, as defined; authorize, designate, issue or reclassify any equity security senior to or on parity with the Series A, with regard to redemption, liquidation preference, voting rights or dividends; Increase the size of the Board of Directors; pay or declare dividends on, make distributions with respect to, or repurchase any shares of capital stock of the Company; incur any aggregate indebtedness for borrowed money in excess of $5,000,000; increase the number of shares available for grant under the Company's 2000 Stock Option Plan or 2007 Stock Option Plan or authorize or establish any new plan or arrangement providing for the grant or issuance of shares of common stock, options or convertible securities to directors, employees or consultants of the Company; or Issue, or commit to issue, any additional shares of Series A.

The holders of the Series A, exclusively and as a separate class, are entitled to elect two directors of the Company. The holders of the Series A and common stock, exclusively and as a separate class, are entitled to elect all remaining directors.

The Company is required to reserve and keep available out of its authorized but unissued shares of common stock such number of shares sufficient to effect the conversion of all outstanding shares of preferred stock plus shares granted and available for grant under the Company's stock option plan.

The amount of such shares of common stock reserved for these purposes at December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 (unaudited) is as follows (in thousands):

The Company has issued stock options under its 2000 Stock Option Plan ("2000 Plan") and the 2007 Stock option Plan ("2007 Plan"), which was renamed as the 2010 Stock Option Plan (hereafter, the 2007 Plan is now referred as the 2010 Plan, and together with the 2000 Plan, the "Plans"). Since February 2007, the Company currently grants its stock options under the 2010 Plan exclusively. Under the 2000 Plan, employees, consultants, and directors have been granted options to purchase an aggregate of 4,775,800 shares of the Company's common stock, less any shares forfeited under the 2000 Plan. Under the 2010 Plan, employees, consultants, and directors may be granted options to purchase up to an aggregate of 6,694,692 shares of the Company's common stock. At December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 there were approximately 616,000 and 289,000 (unaudited) shares of common stock, respectively, available for grant under the 2010 Plan. Under the terms of the Plans, both incentive and non-qualified stock options have been and may be granted with exercise prices not less than the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Options granted pursuant to these plans vest over periods of up to four years and

expire ten years from the grant date. If a 2000 Plan option expires, such as upon termination of employment, becomes unexercisable without having been exercised in full, or is surrendered pursuant to an option exchange program, the unpurchased shares will become available for future grant or sale under the 2000 Plan or the 2010 Plan. If a 2010 Plan option expires, such as after employment termination, becomes unexercisable without having been exercised in full, or is surrendered pursuant to an option exchange program, the unpurchased shares will become available for future grant or sale under the 2010 Plan. If the employee does not exercise vested 2000 Plan options within 30 days of termination, these options will expire and are not able to be issued as new grants under the 2000 Plan. If the employee does not exercise vested 2010 Plan options within 30 days of termination, these options will expire and revert back to the 2010 Plan's option pool. The Company's policy is to issue new common shares upon the exercise of stock options.

The exercise prices of all options granted under the Plans were based on the estimated fair market value of the Company's common stock as determined by the Board of Directors at the date of grant. The Company recorded stock-based compensation cost in the following categories on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):

Activity under the Plans was as follows for the year ended December 31, 2011 and the three months ended March 31, 2012 (in thousands, except weighted average exercise price and remaining contract life):

			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Aggregate Intrinsic Value

Outstanding at December 31, 2010	4,702		$	1.77	7.5	$	11,469
Granted	588			8.21
Exercised	(242	)		1.38
Cancelled/forfeited	(165	)		1.73

Outstanding at December 31, 2011	4,883			2.55	6.9	$	29,566

Granted (unaudited)	336			10.26
Exercised (unaudited)	(154	)		1.68
Cancelled/forfeited (unaudited)	(10	)		5.20

Outstanding at March 31, 2012 (unaudited)	5,055		$	3.08	6.9	$	37,927

Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2011	4,781		$	2.57	6.9	$	28,830

Exercisable at December 31, 2011	2,748		$	1.72	5.7	$	18,948

Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2012 (unaudited)	4,970		$	3.05	6.9	$	37,435

Exercisable at March 31, 2012 (unaudited)	2,950		$	1.74	5.6	$	26,096

The aggregate intrinsic values in the table above represents the difference, if any, between the estimated fair value per share of the Company's common stock and the option exercise prices, multiplied by the number of options at the respective balance sheet dates. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, was $0.7 million, $1.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, and for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 was $0.5 million (unaudited) and $1.1 million (unaudited), respectively. At December 31, 2011, total remaining stock-based compensation expense for unvested awards is $3.2 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.2 years. At March 31, 2012, total remaining stock-based compensation expense for unvested award is $4.1 million (unaudited), which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.3 years.

The weighted-average grant-date fair value per share of options granted for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 were $0.77, $1.25 and $3.41, respectively. The weighted-average grant-date fair value per share of options granted for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $4.20 (unaudited). There were no stock option grants during the three months ended March 31, 2011. The weighted-average fair value per share of options vested for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010, and 2011 were $0.98, $1.03 and $1.01, respectively, for a total fair value of $1.1 million for each of 2009 and 2010, and $0.8 million for 2011. The weighted-average fair value per share of options vested for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 were $0.93 (unaudited) and $1.01 (unaudited) for a total fair value of $0.4 million (unaudited) and $0.3 million (unaudited), respectively.

There was no tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 and for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited).

The Company realized $0.3 million of excess windfall tax benefits from stock option exercises during the year ended December 31, 2011.

The following table summarizes the Company's options granted during the year ended December 31, 2011 and the three months ended March 31, 2012:

On April 20, 2010, the Company issued 50,000 restricted stock units to an executive employee with a grant date fair value of $2.10 per share. These restricted stock units vest on the earlier to occur of (i) the fifth anniversary from the issuance date, or (ii) the completion of a successful strategic event, which includes a financing event, a qualified initial public offering or an acquisition. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, and for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012 (unaudited), compensation expense related to the restricted stock was insignificant.

During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012, the Company recorded an income tax benefit (provision) of $0.1 million (unaudited) and ($0.3) million (unaudited), respectively.

For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2012, the Company's effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate primarily as a result of current state taxes, nondeductible items and changes in deferred income taxes due to the release of the valuation allowance in the fourth quarter of 2011.

The details of the income tax (provision) benefit by jurisdiction for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 are as follows (in thousands):

Income tax (provision) benefit for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 34% to pretax income (loss) as a result of the following (in thousands):

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following at December 31, 2010 and 2011 (in thousands):

	2010			2011

Deferred tax assets:
Deferred revenue	$	4,395		$	2,695
Accrued expenses		2,419			3,463
Accrued legal settlement		2,031			2,029
Stock-based compensation		515			805
Net operating loss carryforwards		1,803			705
Tax credit carryforwards		1,846			2,081
Capital loss carryforwards		411			411

		13,420			12,189
Valuation allowance		(9,015	)		(411	)

Net deferred tax assets		4,405			11,778
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation and amortization		(3,451	)		(3,878	)
State taxes		(954	)		(972	)

Net deferred tax liabilities		(4,405	)		(4,850	)

Net deferred tax assets and liabilities	$	—		$	6,928

Deferred tax assets are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2010 and 2011 as follows (in thousands):

The Company recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2010. In determining the need for a valuation allowance, management reviewed all available evidence pursuant to the requirements of ASC 740. The determination of recording or releasing tax valuation allowances is made, in part, pursuant to an assessment performed by management regarding the likelihood that the Company will generate sufficient future taxable income against which benefits of the deferred tax assets may or may not be realized. This assessment requires management to exercise significant judgment and make estimates with respect to the Company's ability to generate revenue, operating income and taxable income in future periods. Amongst other factors, management must make assumptions regarding overall current and projected business and legal document and ancillary services' industry conditions, operating efficiencies, the Company's ability to timely and effectively adapt to technological change, fully and successfully resolve outstanding legal matters, and the competitive environment which may impact the Company's ability to generate taxable income and, in turn, realize the value of the deferred tax assets. Significant cumulative operating losses in 2010 and prior years and economic uncertainties in the market made the Company's ability to project future taxable income uncertain and volatile at December 31, 2010. Based upon management's assessment of all available evidence, including the Company's history of recent and cumulative losses, the Company concluded as of December 31, 2010, that it was not more likely than not that its net deferred tax assets would be realized.

In 2011, the Company became profitable due to the significant increase in its revenues and a continuous increase in demand for its services and was able to utilize a substantial amount of its federal net operating loss carryforwards. Based upon the current trend of operating results and Company forecasts, the Company believes it is more likely than not that it will realize the benefits of the deferred tax assets. The majority of the Company's 2011 income from operations was earned in the second half of the year resulting in the Company's achievement of three-year cumulative income before income taxes by the fourth quarter of 2011. Accordingly, during the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company released its valuation allowance against deferred tax assets based on the weight of positive evidence that existed at December 31, 2011, except for the allowance of $0.4 million relating to the deferred tax asset for a capital loss carryforward which is expected to expire unused in 2012.

The activity in the valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 was as follows (in thousands):

At December 31, 2011, the Company had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1.1 million and $8.9 million, respectively. The federal and state net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in the years ending December 31, 2028 and 2017, respectively. At December 31, 2011, the Company also had federal and state tax credit carryforwards of $1.6 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The federal tax credit carryforwards will expire beginning in the year ending December 31, 2021 and the state tax credits carry forward indefinitely. The Company has a capital loss carryforward of $1 million at December 31, 2011 which will expire in 2012. Utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards may be subject to an annual limitation based on changes in ownership, as defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

During 2011, the Company realized excess windfall tax benefits of $0.3 million from stock option exercises. These benefits reduced income taxes payable and were recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2011. In accordance with the reporting requirements under ASC 718, the Company did not include $0.5 million excess windfall tax benefits resulting from stock option exercises as components of the Company's gross deferred tax assets and corresponding valuation allowance disclosures, as tax attributes related to those windfall tax benefits should not be recognized until they result in a reduction of taxes payable. The tax effected amount of gross unrealized net operating loss carryforwards excluded under ASC 718 was $0.5 million at December 31, 2011. When realized, those excess windfall tax benefits are credited to additional paid-in capital.

As of December 31, 2010 and 2011, the Company had approximately $1.0 million and $1.2 million of unrecognized tax benefits, respectively, which if recognized, would affect the effective income tax rate.

The following table summarizes the changes in unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands):

During all years presented the Company recognized interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes on the consolidated statements of operations. There were no

significant changes in unrecognized tax benefits during the three months ended March 31, 2012. The amount of interest and penalties accrued as of December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 (unaudited) are insignificant. The balance of the unrecognized tax benefits reduce tax attributes that have not yet been utilized on the Company's tax return.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, state of California and other state jurisdictions.

The years ended December 31, 2009 through 2010 remain open to examination by the Internal Revenue Service while the tax years ended December 31, 2007 through 2010 remain open to examination by the California Franchise Tax Board. The Company was under audit during 2010 by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2008 tax year, and the audit was closed during 2011 with a no change letter issued to the Company by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company was under audit by the California Franchise Tax Board in fiscal 2009, which was withdrawn during the year ended December 31, 2010. All net operating loss carryforwards generated from 2005 and income tax credit carryforwards generated to date are subject to adjustment for federal and state purposes. The Company does not anticipate that the unrecognized tax benefits will significantly decrease within the next twelve months.

A consultant who is a stockholder of the Company (the "Consultant"), provides legal and public relation consultancy services to the Company. The Company expensed consultancy fees of $188,000, $250,000 and $125,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively, to the Consultant. In 2010, the Consultant provided services of $62,000 in settlement of a promissory note due from the Consultant which is included in the 2010 expense. The consultancy services agreement expired December 31, 2011, and fees paid during the three months ended March 31, 2011 (unaudited) were insignificant.

During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, the Company paid $315,000 and $195,000, respectively, in legal fees to a law firm in which one of the Company's co-founder and stockholder is also a partner. Such fees paid to this law firm for 2009 were insignificant. During the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited) such fees were insignificant.

The Company utilizes a credit card to make purchases for ordinary operating requirements and the underlying obligations incurred by the Company for these charges are guaranteed by the personal assets of one of the Company's co-founders. The Company also receives certain benefits from incurring these expenditures on this card including airline miles and cash reward points offered by the credit card's financial institution.

The Company has a defined contribution savings plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. This plan covers substantially all employees who meet minimum age and service requirements and allows participants to defer a portion of their annual compensation on a pre-tax basis. Company contributions to the plan are made at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The Company made contributions of $464,000, $613,000 and $744,000 to the 401(k) plan during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively.

In connection with the issuance of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company evaluated subsequent events through April 5, 2012, the date the consolidated financial statements were issued. In connection with the issuance of the interim consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company evaluated subsequent events through June 4, 2012.

The following table sets forth the costs and expenses, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, payable in connection with the sale and distribution of the securities being registered. All amounts are estimated except the SEC registration fee and the FINRA filing fee. All the expenses below will be paid by the Registrant.

Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law authorizes a court to award, or a corporation's board of directors to grant, indemnity to directors and officers in terms sufficiently broad to permit such indemnification under certain circumstances for liabilities, including reimbursement for expenses incurred, arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be in effect upon the completion of this offering provides for indemnification of our directors, officers, employees and other agents to the maximum extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, and our amended and restated bylaws to be in effect upon the completion of this offering provide for indemnification of our directors, officers, employees and other agents to the maximum extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law.

In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and officers containing provisions which are in some respects broader than the specific indemnification provisions contained in the Delaware General Corporation Law. The indemnification agreements require us, among other things, to indemnify our directors against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors and to advance their expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified.

The underwriting agreement filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this registration statement provides for indemnification by the underwriters of the Registrant and its officers and directors for certain liabilities arising under the Securities Act and otherwise.

Since March 31, 2009, we have made the following sales of unregistered securities (after giving effect to a 3-for-1 forward stock split effected in July 2011 and a 2-for-3 reverse stock split to be effected immediately prior to the effectiveness of this offering):

Unless otherwise stated, the sales of the above securities were deemed to be exempt from registration under Rule 701 promulgated under Section 3(b) of the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering or pursuant to benefit plans and contracts relating to compensation as provided under Rule 701. The recipients of the securities in each of these transactions represented their intentions to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof, and appropriate legends were placed upon the stock certificates issued in these transactions. All recipients had adequate access, through their relationships with the Registrant, to information about the Registrant. The sales of these securities were made without any general solicitation or advertising.

		Description of Exhibit

1.1		Form of Underwriting Agreement.
3.1	#	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of LegalZoom.com, Inc., as currently in effect.
3.2	#	Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of LegalZoom.com, Inc. to be in effect upon completion of the offering.
3.3	#	Bylaws of LegalZoom.com, Inc., as currently in effect.
3.4	#	Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of LegalZoom.com, Inc., to be in effect upon completion of the offering.
4.1		Form of LegalZoom.com, Inc.'s Common Stock Certificate.
4.2	#	Investors' Rights Agreement.
5.1		Opinion of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP.
10.1	+#	2000 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and forms of award agreements.
10.2	+#	2010 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, and forms of award agreements.
10.3	+*	2012 Equity Incentive Plan and forms of award agreements.
10.4	+#	Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers.
10.5	+#	Employment Agreement, dated May 8, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Chas Rampenthal.
10.6	+*	2012 Management Incentive Plan.
10.7	+#	Board Member Offer Letter, dated April 30, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com and Nehemia Zucker.
10.8	+#	Employment Agreement, dated May 8, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Edward Hartman.
10.9	+#	Employment Agreement, dated May 8, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Fred Krupica.
10.10	+#	Employment Agreement, dated May 8, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Frank Monestere.
10.11	+#	Employment Agreement, dated May 8, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and John Suh.
10.12	+#	Employment Agreement, dated May 8, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Sheila Tan.
10.13	+#	Board Member Offer Letter, dated October 14, 2010, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Susan Decker.
10.14	#	Loan and Security Agreement, dated October 31, 2008, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.15	#	First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated February 24, 2009, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.16	#	Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated March 6, 2009, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.

		Description of Exhibit

10.17	#	Third Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated July 7, 2009, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.18	#	Fourth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated July 27, 2009, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.19	#	Fifth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated January 8, 2010, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.20	#	Sixth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated October 29, 2010, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.21	#	Seventh Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated March 1, 2011, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.22	#	Eighth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated May 17, 2011, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.23	#	Ninth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated July 20, 2011, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.24	#	Tenth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated December 9, 2011, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.25	#	California Office Lease—Glendale Galleria II, dated October 18, 2010, by and between Glendale II Mall Associates, LLC and LegalZoom.com, Inc.
10.26	#	Eleventh Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated April 6, 2012, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.27	+#	Employment Agreement, dated May 8, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Tracy Terrill.
10.28	#	Office Lease, dated August 26, 2010, by and between Legacy Partners II Glendale N. Brand, LLC and LegalZoom.com, Inc.
10.29	#	Sublease Agreement, dated December 7, 2009, by and between Marsh USA Inc. and LegalZoom.com, Inc., as amended.
10.30	#	Lease Agreement, dated November 22, 2011, by and between John Hancock Life Insurance Company and LegalZoom.com, Inc.
10.31	+#	Board Member Offer Letter and Consent, dated June 21, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Daniel Cooperman.
10.32	+	Board Member Offer Letter, dated July 17, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Jason Trevisan.
10.33	+	Board Member Offer Letter, dated July 19, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Alan Spoon.
10.34	+	Board Member Offer Letter and Consent, dated July 19, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Ken McBride.
10.35	+	Board Member Offer Letter, dated July 19, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Brian Liu.
10.36	+	Board Member Offer Letter, dated July 19, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Susan Decker.
10.37	+	Employment Agreement, dated February 15, 2007, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and John Suh, as amended.

Schedules have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted as to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the provisions described in Item 14, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriter at the closing specified in the underwriting agreements, certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, we have duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-1 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Los Angeles, State of California, on July 23, 2012.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

		Description of Exhibit

1.1		Form of Underwriting Agreement.
3.1	#	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of LegalZoom.com, Inc., as currently in effect.
3.2	#	Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of LegalZoom.com, Inc. to be in effect upon completion of the offering.
3.3	#	Bylaws of LegalZoom.com, Inc., as currently in effect.
3.4	#	Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of LegalZoom.com, Inc., to be in effect upon completion of the offering.
4.1		Form of LegalZoom.com, Inc.'s Common Stock Certificate.
4.2	#	Investors' Rights Agreement.
5.1		Opinion of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP.
10.1	+#	2000 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and forms of award agreements.
10.2	+#	2010 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, and forms of award agreements.
10.3	+*	2012 Equity Incentive Plan and forms of award agreements.
10.4	+#	Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers.
10.5	+#	Employment Agreement, dated May 8, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Chas Rampenthal.
10.6	+*	2012 Management Incentive Plan.
10.7	+#	Board Member Offer Letter, dated April 30, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Nehemia Zucker.
10.8	+#	Employment Agreement, dated May 8, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Edward Hartman.
10.9	+#	Employment Agreement, dated May 8, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Fred Krupica.
10.10	+#	Employment Agreement, dated May 8, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Frank Monestere.
10.11	+#	Employment Agreement, dated May 8, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and John Suh.
10.12	+#	Employment Agreement, dated May 8, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Sheila Tan.
10.13	+#	Board Member Offer Letter, dated October 14, 2010, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Susan Decker.
10.14	#	Loan and Security Agreement, dated October 31, 2008, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.15	#	First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated February 24, 2009, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.16	#	Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated March 6, 2009, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.

		Description of Exhibit

10.17	#	Third Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated July 7, 2009, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.18	#	Fourth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated July 27, 2009, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.19	#	Fifth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated January 8, 2010, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.20	#	Sixth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated October 29, 2010, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.21	#	Seventh Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated March 1, 2011, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.22	#	Eighth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated May 17, 2011, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.23	#	Ninth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated July 20, 2011, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.24	#	Tenth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated December 9, 2011, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.25	#	California Office Lease—Glendale Galleria II, dated October 18, 2010, by and between Glendale II Mall Associates, LLC and LegalZoom.com, Inc.
10.26	#	Eleventh Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated April 6, 2012, between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Comerica Bank.
10.27	+#	Employment Agreement, dated May 8, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Tracy Terrill.
10.28	#	Office Lease, dated August 26, 2010, by and between Legacy Partners II Glendale N. Brand, LLC and LegalZoom.com, Inc.
10.29	#	Sublease Agreement, dated December 7, 2009, by and between Marsh USA Inc. and LegalZoom.com, Inc., as amended.
10.30	#	Lease Agreement, dated November 22, 2011, by and between John Hancock Life Insurance Company and LegalZoom.com, Inc.
10.31	+#	Board Member Offer Letter and Consent, dated June 21, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Daniel Cooperman.
10.32	+	Board Member Offer Letter, dated July 17, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Jason Trevisan.
10.33	+	Board Member Offer Letter, dated July 19, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Alan Spoon.
10.34	+	Board Member Offer Letter and Consent, dated July 19, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Ken McBride.
10.35	+	Board Member Offer Letter, dated July 19, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Brian Liu.
10.36	+	Board Member Offer Letter, dated July 19, 2012, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and Susan Decker.
10.37	+	Employment Agreement, dated February 15, 2007, by and between LegalZoom.com, Inc. and John Suh, as amended.


Delaware	7370	95-4752856
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
101 North Brand Boulevard, 11^th Floor Glendale, California 91203 (323) 962-8600 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant's principal executive offices)
John Suh Chief Executive Officer LegalZoom.com, Inc. 101 North Brand Boulevard, 11th Floor Glendale, California 91203 (323) 962-8600 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)
*Please send copies of all communications to:*
C. Thomas Hopkins, Esq. Louis P.A. Lehot, Esq. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600 Los Angeles, California 90067 (310) 228-3735	Fred Krupica Chief Financial Officer Chas Rampenthal, Esq. General Counsel and Secretary LegalZoom.com, Inc. 101 North Brand Boulevard, 11th Floor Glendale, California 91203 (323) 962-8600	Steven B. Stokdyk, Esq. Latham & Watkins LLP 355 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, California 90071 (213) 485-1234


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer ý (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

	Price to Public	Underwriting Discounts and Commissions	Proceeds to LegalZoom	Proceeds to Selling Stockholders

Per Share	$	$	$	$
Total	$	$	$	$


RBC CAPITAL MARKETS		WILLIAM BLAIR		CANTOR FITZGERALD & CO.		MONTGOMERY & CO.


Assumed initial public offering price per share			$	11.00

Net tangible book value (deficit) per share as of March 31, 2012	(0.24	)
Increase per share attributable to conversion of Series A	0.10

Pro forma net tangible book value (deficit) per share as of March 31, 2012	(0.14	)
Increase per share attributable to this offering	0.94
Pro forma net tangible book value per share, as adjusted to give effect to this offering				0.80

Dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share to new investors in this offering			$	10.20

		Page

Prospectus Summary		1
Risk Factors		14
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements		29
Market, Industry and Other Data		30
Use of Proceeds		31
Dividend Policy		31
Capitalization		32
Dilution		34
Selected Consolidated Financial Data		36
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		40
Business		68
Management		79
Executive Compensation		86
Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions		104
Principal and Selling Stockholders		106
Description of Capital Stock		110
Shares Eligible For Future Sale		116
Material U.S. Federal Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. Holders of Common Stock		118
Underwriting		122
Legal Matters		128
Experts		128
Where You Can Find More Information		128
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-1

	Shares Purchased					Total Consideration

	Shares Purchased					Total Consideration					Average Price Per Share
	Number		Percent			Amount		Percent			Average Price Per Share
Existing stockholders⁽¹⁾		36,456,374		90.6	%	$	54,268,407		56.5	%	$	1.49
New investors		3,800,000		9.4	%	$	41,800,000		43.5	%	$	11.00

Total		40,256,374		100.0	%	$	96,068,407		100.0	%

	As of December 31,

	As of December 31,						As of March 31, 2012
	2010			2011			As of March 31, 2012
	(in thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	19,169		$	27,108		$	31,922
Working capital (deficit)		(5,905	)		(2,316	)		(4,060	)
Total assets		35,629			53,501			62,291
Total liabilities		46,488			50,620			58,866
Redeemable convertible preferred stock		58,649			62,691			63,699
Total stockholders' deficit		(69,508	)		(59,810	)		(60,274	)

	Three Months Ended March 31,

	2011		2012		% Change
	(in thousands)
Revenues by type:
Transaction revenues	$	31,568	$	34,494		9	%
Subscription revenues		4,772		10,001		110	%
Other		1,948		2,493		28	%

Total revenues	$	38,288	$	46,988		23	%

	Year Ended December 31,

	Year Ended December 31,						2009 to 2010 % Change			2010 to 2011 % Change
	2009		2010		2011		2009 to 2010 % Change			2010 to 2011 % Change
	(in thousands)
Revenues by type:
Transaction revenues	$	92,561	$	105,491	$	121,856		14	%		16	%
Subscription revenues		4,966		10,889		27,878		119	%		156	%
Other		5,772		4,391		6,332		(24	)%		44	%

Total revenues	$	103,299	$	120,771	$	156,066		17	%		29	%

			Payment due by Period

	Total		Less than 1 year		1 - 3 years		4 - 5 years		More than 5 years
	(in thousands)
Operating lease commitments	$	17,256	$	2,572	$	6,108	$	1,828	$	6,748
Purchase commitments		19,559		18,380		1,179		—		—
Capital lease obligations		205		205		—		—		—

Total	$	37,020	$	21,157	$	7,287	$	1,828	$	6,748

Date		Exercise Price and Fair Value Per Share of Common Stock

September 29, 2011	537	$	8.21
December 20, 2011	51	$	8.22
January 31, 2012	56	$	8.61
March 31, 2012	280	$	10.59

Small Business Services		Consumer Services

LLC Formation		Last Will and Testament
Incorporation		Power of Attorney
Trademark		Living Will
DBA/Fictitious Business Name		Living Trust
Copyright		Uncontested Divorce
Non-Profit Corporation		Name Change
Provisional Application for Patent

Name and Principal Position

John Suh, Chief Executive Officer and Director	2011	332,250	—	—	350,000	9,800	692,050
Fred Krupica, Chief Financial Officer	2011	253,050	—	548,472	254,000	68,470	1,123,992
Edward Hartman, Chief Strategy Officer	2011	215,100	40,000	342,795	120,000	15,651	733,546

Name

John Suh	309,000	340,000
Fred Krupica	247,200	255,000
Edward Hartman	185,400	225,000


MORGAN STANLEY		BofA MERRILL LYNCH

Name

John Suh	175,000	350,000
Fred Krupica	127,000	254,000
Edward Hartman	60,000	120,000

	Option Awards

	Option Awards											Stock Awards
					Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)							Stock Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable				Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date			Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)			Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)
John Suh		383,604		—		—		1.7900		2/9/17	⁽¹⁾		—			—
		40,000		360,000		—		2.1000		2/25/20	⁽²⁾		—			—
Fred Krupica		420,000		60,000		—		2.2450		6/24/18	⁽³⁾
													50,000	⁽⁴⁾		430,500
		—		160,000		—		8.2050		9/29/21	⁽⁵⁾⁽⁷⁾		—			—
Edward Hartman		—		100,000		—		8.2050		9/29/21	⁽⁶⁾⁽⁷⁾		—			—

	Initial Term of Employment Agreements⁽¹⁾	Base Salary Effective as of an IPO⁽²⁾

John Suh	2 years	$	425,000	100	%	433,332	⁽⁴⁾	⁽⁶⁾	⁽⁸⁾	⁽⁹⁾⁽¹⁰⁾
Fred Krupica	2 years	$	310,000	50	%	80,000	⁽⁵⁾	⁽⁷⁾	⁽⁸⁾	⁽⁹⁾⁽¹⁰⁾
Eddie Hartman	2 years	$	235,000	40	%	53,333	⁽⁵⁾	⁽⁷⁾	⁽⁸⁾	⁽⁹⁾

Name

Susan Decker	20,000	20,000
Kamran Pourzanjani⁽¹⁾	20,000	20,000
Alan Spoon⁽²⁾	—	—
Jason Trevisan⁽²⁾	—	—

Name

Susan Decker	—	38,884	61,116
Kamran Pourzanjani	6,666	8,338	—
Alan Spoon	—	—	—
Jason Trevisan	—	—	—

Elements:

Annual retainer	25,000	55,000	10,000
Newly-elected director one-time inducement equity grant	—	18,000	3,333
Audit committee chair	15,000	—	—
Compensation committee chair	7,500	—	—
Nominating and governance committee chair	5,000	—	—
Attendance at board and committee meetings:	1,000 per meeting	—	—

Name		Number of Shares

Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
William Blair & Company, L.L.C.
RBC Capital Markets, LLC
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.
Montgomery & Co., LLC

Total:			8,000,000

		Total

	Per Share	No Exercise	Full Exercise
Public offering price	$	$	$
Underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid by:
Us
The selling stockholders
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
Proceeds, before expenses, to selling stockholders

		Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets		F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Deficit		F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-7


Level 1	—	Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2	—	Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3	—	Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

		Useful Life (years)

Purchased and internally developed software		3
Furniture and office equipment		5
Computer hardware		3
Leasehold improvements		Shorter of lease term or useful life

	Year Ended December 31,

	Year Ended December 31,									Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
	2009			2010			2011			Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
										(unaudited)
Risk-free interest rate		2.34	%		2.35	%		1.25	%		1.22	%
Expected life (years)		5.95			5.90			6.10			5.90
Dividend yield		—			—			—			—
Volatility		50	%		45	%		42	%		42	%

	Balance at beginning of period		Reduction of revenues		Write offs, net of recoveries			Balance at end of period

December 31, 2009	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—
December 31, 2010		—		53		—			53
December 31, 2011		53		1,180		(1,019	)		214
March 31, 2012 (unaudited)		214		271		(224	)		261

	Operating Leases		Capital Leases

Years ending December 31,
2012	$	2,572	$	205
2013		2,298		—
2014		1,878		—
2015		1,932		—
2016		1,828		—
Thereafter		6,748		—

Total minimum lease payments	$	17,256	$	205

Less amounts representing interest				(3	)

Present value of net minimum lease payments			$	202

	2009			2010			2011

Current
Federal	$	(61	)	$	65		$	(313	)
State		(250	)		(347	)		(617	)

Total current		(311	)		(282	)		(930	)
Deferred
Federal		—			—			4,818
State		—			—			2,110

Total deferred		—			—			6,928

Total income tax (provision) benefit	$	(311	)	$	(282	)	$	5,998

	2009			2010			2011

Income tax (provision) benefit at statutory rate	$	112		$	1,272		$	(2,082	)
State income taxes		259			(550	)		(372	)
Research and development credits		743			247			247
Change in valuation allowance		(753	)		6			8,604
Stock-based compensation expense		(113	)		(911	)		(21	)
Unrecognized tax benefits		(674	)		(175	)		(176	)
Other		115			(171	)		(202	)

Total income tax (provision) benefit	$	(311	)	$	(282	)	$	5,998

	2010			2011

Deferred tax assets—current	$	3,174		$	6,735
Valuation allowance—current		(3,174	)		(237	)

Net deferred tax assets—current		—			6,498

Deferred tax assets—noncurrent		5,841			604
Valuation allowance—noncurrent		(5,841	)		(174	)

Net deferred tax assets—noncurrent	$	—		$	430

	Balance at beginning of period		Increase / (decrease)			Balance at end of period

December 31, 2009	$	8,268	$	753		$	9,021
December 31, 2010		9,021		(6	)		9,015
December 31, 2011		9,015		(8,604	)		411

	Gross Unrealized Tax Benefits

Balance at December 31, 2008	$	616
Additions for tax positions related to the current year		196

Balance at December 31, 2009		812
Additions for tax positions related to the current year		201

Balance at December 31, 2010		1,013
Additions for tax positions related to the current year		201

Balance at December 31, 2011	$	1,214

Item	Amount

SEC registration fee	$	13,752
FINRA filing fee		12,500
Initial NYSE listing fee		194,000
Legal fees and expenses		1,950,000
Accounting fees and expenses		800,000
Printing and engraving expenses		350,000
Transfer agent and registrar fees and expenses		15,500
Blue Sky fees and expenses		15,000
Miscellaneous fees and expenses		75,000

Total	$	3,425,752