ghl-20230313

Please vote your shares promptly to ensure they are represented at the meeting. You may submit your proxy vote by completing and signing the enclosed proxy card and returning it in the envelope provided. If you decide to attend the remote meeting and wish to change your proxy vote, you may do so automatically by voting at the remote meeting. Stockholders of record also have the option of voting their shares via the Internet or by telephone. Instructions on how to vote via the Internet or by telephone are on the proxy card.


Date and Time:			Tuesday, May 2, 2023 at 12:00 p.m. (Noon), Eastern Time

Place:			This meeting will be conducted remotely at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GHL2023. There will not be a physical location for the meeting, and you will not be able to attend the meeting in person. Stockholders will be able to attend, vote, and submit questions (both before, and during a portion of, the meeting) virtually. You will need to have your 16-digit control number which is included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials) to join the annual meeting.

Items of Business:			1. The election of five directors to serve until the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders.

			2. An advisory vote to approve executive compensation (Say on Pay).

			3. An advisory vote to approve the annual frequency of a say-on-pay vote.

			4. The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2023.

			5. The consideration of a stockholder proposal, if properly presented by the stockholder proponent.

			6. Any other business that may properly be considered at the meeting or at any adjournment of the meeting.

Record Date:			You may vote if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on March 3, 2023.

Voting by Proxy, via the Internet or by telephone:			Whether or not you plan to attend the remote annual meeting, please vote your shares by proxy or via the Internet or by telephone to ensure they are represented at the meeting. You may submit your proxy vote by completing, signing and promptly returning the enclosed proxy card by mail. Instructions on how to vote via the Internet or by telephone are provided on the proxy card.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting To Be Held on May 2, 2023:			Our Proxy Statement and 2022 Annual Report, which includes our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 and other materials are available free of charge on our website at: https://www.greenhill.com/investor/report. On or around March 13, 2023 we will have sent to certain of our stockholders a notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”), which includes instructions on how to access our Proxy Statement and 2022 Annual Report to Stockholders and vote online. Stockholders who do not receive the Notice will continue to receive either a paper or an electronic copy of our proxy materials, which will be sent on or around March 13, 2023. For more information, see Frequently Asked Questions.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or otherwise by a broker, bank, trust or other nominee, then the broker, bank, trust or other nominee is considered to be the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. However, you still are considered the beneficial owner of those shares, and your shares are said to be held in “street name.” Street name holders generally cannot vote their shares directly and must instead instruct the broker, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote their shares using the method described above under “How do I submit my proxy vote?”

Internet and telephone voting information is provided on the proxy card. A 16-digit control number, which is the number located below the account number on the proxy card, is designated to verify a stockholder’s identity and allow the stockholder to vote their shares and confirm that their voting instructions have been recorded properly. If you vote via the Internet or by telephone, please do not return a signed proxy card. Stockholders who hold their shares through a bank or broker can vote via the Internet or by telephone if that option is offered by the bank or broker.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock present at the meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the annual meeting is required to approve the nominees for director, executive compensation advisory vote, and to ratify the appointment of our independent auditor. The say-on-pay frequency vote is an advisory vote. The option of one year, if approved by the stockholders, will be deemed to be the recommendation of the stockholders. The stockholder proposal is precatory and therefore is not binding on the Board or the Company.

Broker non-votes occur when a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” does not give instructions to the broker or nominee holding the shares as to how to vote on matters deemed “non-routine.” Generally, if shares are held in street name, the beneficial owner of the shares is entitled to give voting instructions to the broker or nominee holding the shares. If the beneficial owner does not provide voting instructions, the broker or nominee can still use its discretion to vote the shares with respect to matters that are considered to be “routine,” such as the proposal to ratify the appointment of our independent auditor, but not with respect to “non-routine” matters. Under the rules and interpretations of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), “non-routine” matters are matters that may substantially affect the rights or privileges of stockholders, such as mergers, stockholder proposals, elections of directors, even if not contested, and advisory votes on executive compensation. Broker non-votes are counted toward a quorum.

by mail or e-mail a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which we refer to as the Notice, containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials over the Internet and how to vote. The Notice is not a ballot or proxy card and cannot be used to vote your shares of common stock. You will not receive paper copies of the proxy materials unless you request the materials by following the instructions on the Notice or on the website referred to on the Notice. If you own shares of common stock in more than one account — for example, in a joint account with your spouse and in your individual brokerage account — you may have received more than one Notice. To vote all of your shares of common stock, please follow each of the separate proxy voting instructions that you received for your shares of common stock held in each of your different accounts. We expect to send the Notice to most of our stockholders by mail or email beginning on or about March 13, 2023.

The Notice includes, among other matters: (i) the Internet access link or address, date and time of the remote annual meeting; (ii) a brief description of the proposals to be voted on at the annual meeting and the Board’s voting recommendation with regard to each proposal; (iii) information regarding the website where the proxy materials are posted; (iv) various methods by which a stockholder may request paper or electronic copies of the proxy materials; and (v) instructions on how to vote by Internet, by telephone, by mail or at the annual meeting.

SEC rules permit us to deliver a single copy of this proxy statement and our 2022 Annual Report to any household not participating in electronic proxy material delivery at which two or more stockholders reside, if we believe the stockholders are members of the same family. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs. If your household received a single set of proxy materials, but you would prefer to receive a separate copy of this proxy statement or our 2022 Annual Report, you may contact Broadridge Householding Department, by calling their toll-free number, 1-866-540-7095, or by writing to: Broadridge Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, and they will deliver those documents to you promptly upon receiving your request.

The following table shows how many shares of our common stock were beneficially owned as of March 3, 2023, by each of our directors and executive officers named in the 2022 Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement, and by all of our directors and executive officers as a group. To the best of our knowledge, based on filings made under Section 13(d) and Section 13(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) (“Filings”), except as noted below, no stockholder beneficially owned more than five percent of our common stock as of March 3, 2023. The percentage has been calculated on the basis of 18,310,176 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 3, 2023 (excluding treasury stock).


	Shares Beneficially Owned
Name of Beneficial Owner	Number	Percent


Directors and Named Executive Officers:
Scott L. Bok (1)	2,950,091	16.1	%
Robert F. Greenhill (2)	2,453,896	13.4	%
Kevin M. Costantino	170,954	*
David A. Wyles	98,707	*
Harold J. Rodriguez, Jr. (3)	210,482	1.1	%
Gitanjali P. Faleiro	13,637	*
Ulrika M. Ekman	8,443	*
Kevin T. Ferro	77,972	*
Meryl D. Hartzband	46,880	*
John D. Liu	31,023	*
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (10 persons)	6,062,085	33.1	%
Other 5% Stockholders:
The Capital Management Corporation (4)	2,336,652	12.8	%

(1) Mr. Bok’s beneficial ownership is calculated by attributing to him all shares owned by five entities: (i) Bok Family Partners, L.P., which owns 1,678,388 of our shares, (ii) Bok Family Foundation, which owns 288,783 of our shares, (iii) Scott L. Bok November 2022 Annuity Trust, which owns 580,023 of our shares, (iv) Scott L. Bok November 2021 Annuity Trust, which owns 75,331 of our shares, (v) Scott L. Bok November 2020 Annuity Trust, which owns 194,927 of our shares and (iv) Scott L. Bok March 2020 Annuity Trust which owns 132,639 of our shares. Mr. Bok expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of securities owned by Bok Family Partners, L.P. and of the shares held by the Bok Family Foundation.

(2) Mr. Greenhill’s beneficial ownership is calculated by attributing to him all 425,212 shares of our common stock owned by him and by three entities controlled by him: (i) Greenhill Family Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, which owns 989,524 of our shares, (ii) Riversville Aircraft Corporation II, a Delaware corporation, which owns 239,680 of our shares and (iii) Socatean Partners, a Connecticut general partnership, which owns 799,480 of our shares. Mr. Greenhill expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of common stock held by other members of his family in Greenhill Family Limited Partnership.

Information about our executive officers can be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (the “2022 Form 10-K”) and is incorporated herein by reference. See “Item 1 - Executive Officers and Directors”. Our executive officers and directors are not permitted to hedge or otherwise dispose of the economic risk of ownership of these shares or any other shares owned by them through short sales, option transactions or use of derivative instruments. See “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Other Compensation Program and Governance Features” below.

Scott L. Bok, 63, has served as our Chairman since 2019, has served as CEO since April 2010, served as Co-CEO between October 2007 and April 2010, and has served as our U.S. President between January 2004 and October 2007. In addition, Mr. Bok has been a director of Greenhill & Co., Inc. since its incorporation in March 2004. Mr. Bok joined Greenhill as a Managing Director in February 1997. Before joining Greenhill, Mr. Bok was a Managing Director in the mergers, acquisitions and restructuring department of Morgan Stanley & Co., where he worked from 1986 to 1997, based in New York and London. From 1984 to 1986, Mr. Bok practiced mergers and acquisitions and securities law in New York with Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. Mr. Bok also served as a member of the Board of Directors of Iridium Communications Inc., from 2009 to 2013. Mr.Bok currently serves as Chair of the Board of Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania and the Chair of the Board of Trustees of the American Museum of Natural History. We chose to nominate Mr. Bok as a director because he has significant and relevant experience in managing and leading our firm successfully; in addition, he is a trusted advisor to many of the firm’s clients as a result of more than thirty years of experience on complex transactions.

Meryl D. Hartzband, 68, has served on our Board since July 2018. Ms. Hartzband currently serves on the Board of Directors of Everest Re Group, Ltd., a publicly-traded insurance and reinsurance company listed on NYSE, the Board of Directors of Conning Holdings Limited, a leading global investment management firm, and the Board of Directors of Octagon Credit Investors, LLC, a below investment grade credit investment advisor majority owned by Conning. Past directorships include The Navigators Group, Inc., ACE Limited, Travelers Property Casualty Corp., AXIS Capital Holdings Limited, Alterra Capital Holdings Limited, and numerous portfolio companies of the Trident Funds. She was a founding partner of Stone Point Capital, a private equity firm that focuses on investing in the global financial services industry. From 1999 to 2015, she served as the firm’s Chief Investment Officer and as a member of the Investment Committees of the Trident Funds. Prior to that, she was a Managing Director at J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., where, during a 16-year career, she specialized in managing private equity investments in the financial services industry. We believe Ms. Hartzband’s specialty knowledge around strategies for investment portfolios in the insurance industry and her financial background, as well as her experiences as a director of several public and private companies, provide valuable perspectives to our Board.

John D. Liu, 54, has served on our Board since June 2017 and has also served as our lead independent director since April 2021. Since March 2008, Mr. Liu has been the CEO of Essex Equity Management, a financial services company, and managing partner of Richmond Hill Investments, an investment management firm. Prior to that time, Mr. Liu was employed for 12 years by Greenhill until March 2008 in positions of increasing responsibility, including as chief financial officer from January 2004 to March 2008 and as co-head of U.S. Mergers and Acquisitions from January 2007 to March 2008. Earlier in his career, Mr. Liu worked at Wolfensohn & Co. and was an analyst at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette. Mr. Liu also serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Whirlpool Corporation. We chose to nominate Mr. Liu as a director because he is a recognized leader

Kevin T. Ferro, 52, has served on our Board of Directors since February 2021. Mr. Ferro is the founder of Ferro Holdings LLC, a Florida based family-owned holding company that was formed in 2019. Prior to forming Ferro Holdings, Mr. Ferro built and managed Vatera Holdings LLC, an investment advisor with a range of capabilities across traditional and alternative asset classes, for which he served as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer from 2006 until its sale in 2018. Prior to Vatera, Mr. Ferro founded and served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Ferro Capital LLC, an alternative investments firm with offices in New York and Frankfurt that managed portfolios for clients in the U.S. and Europe. Mr. Ferro’s experience also includes posts as Global Head of Alternative Investment Strategies for Commerzbank, where he managed alternative investment portfolios for the bank and its clients, and as Vice President at the D. E. Shaw Group working out of its New York City, London and Tokyo offices. Throughout his career, Mr. Ferro has served on numerous boards of public and private companies. We chose to nominate Mr. Ferro as a director because we believe that Mr. Ferro’s significant finance experience, including experience in buying and selling companies in a variety of sectors, as well as his experience as a director of several public and private companies will brings a valuable perspective to our Board and the oversight of our business.

Ulrika M. Ekman, 60, has served on our Board of Directors since August 2021. Ms. Ekman serves as a managing member of Riga Property LLC, a private investment firm in the agricultural sector. Ms. Ekman is also a director and an active volunteer in a number of not-for-profit organizations, with a particular focus on youth, education and women’s issues. Ms. Ekman is currently nominated to be a member of the board of directors of a European financial services institution that is publicly listed. Following a successful vote by shareholders, Ms. Ekman will be formally appointed to such board of directors. From 2004 to 2012, Ms. Ekman served as Greenhill & Co.'s General Counsel and as Co-Head of North American M&A, as well as on the Management Committee. Prior to joining Greenhill, Ms. Ekman was a partner in the M&A group of Davis Polk LLP, where she represented clients in complex domestic and cross-border transactions across a broad range of industries. We have nominated Ms. Ekman as a new director candidate because she was personally known to several members of management and the board of directors, who respect her high integrity and familiarity with Greenhill. We believe Ms. Ekman’s significant transaction and governance-related experience, as well as her service and previous management experience at Greenhill and other professional services companies will bring valuable perspectives to the oversight of our business.

The Board conducts its business through meetings of the Board and the following standing committees: Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance. Each of the three standing committees has adopted and operates under a written charter. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide for a Lead Independent Director. All of our corporate governance documents, including our written committee charters, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and our Related Person Transaction Policy, are available on our website at www.greenhill.com. The written charters, the Guidelines, the Code and the Related Person Transaction Policy are also available in print to any stockholder who requests them.

Under applicable NYSE listing standards, a majority of the Board of Directors must be independent, and no director qualifies as “independent” unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with Greenhill. In connection with this independence determination, the Board considered transactions and relationships between each director or director nominee or any member of his or her immediate family and Greenhill and its subsidiaries and affiliates, including those reported under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” below. The Board also examined transactions and relationships between directors and our director nominee or their affiliates and members of Greenhill’s senior management or their affiliates. The purpose of this review was to determine whether any such relationships or transactions were inconsistent with a determination that the director or director nominee is independent.

The Audit Committee is a separate committee established in accordance with Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act, comprised entirely of independent, non-employee directors. The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are “independent” as that term is defined in the applicable NYSE listing standards and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and that all members are financially literate as required by the applicable NYSE listing standards. The Chair of the Audit Committee, Ms. Hartzband, is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable regulations of the SEC.

The Audit Committee’s purpose is to oversee the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence and performance, the integrity of our financial statements, the performance of our internal audit function and independent auditors and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate the independent auditors and is directly responsible for the compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditors. The Audit Committee reviews and discusses with management and the independent auditors the annual audited and quarterly financial statements, reviews the integrity of the financial reporting processes, both internal and external, and prepares the Audit Committee Report included in the proxy statement in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. The Audit Committee met five times during 2022. In addition, the SEC Subcommittee of the Audit Committee, which is responsible for reviewing periodic reports of Greenhill filed with the SEC to the extent not previously reviewed by the Audit Committee, met three times during 2022.

The Compensation Committee, comprised entirely of independent, non-employee directors, is responsible for establishing and administering our policies involving the compensation of our executive officers. The Board has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee are “independent” as that term is defined in applicable NYSE listing standards. The Compensation Committee oversees our compensation and benefits policies generally, evaluates senior executive performance, oversees and sets compensation for our senior executives and reviews management’s succession plan. The Compensation Committee evaluates our compensation philosophy, goals and objectives generally, approves corporate goals related to the compensation of our senior executives (including the CEO), and approves compensation and compensatory arrangements applicable to our other executive officers based on our compensation goals and objectives. See “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more information on the Compensation Committee’s role in determining compensation. In addition, the Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending the establishment of broad-based incentive compensation, equity-based, retirement or other material employee benefit plans, and for discharging any duties under the terms of our equity incentive plan. The Compensation Committee met three times during 2022.

The Board has determined that all members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are “independent” as that term is defined in applicable NYSE listing standards. The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies and recommends individuals qualified to become members of the Board and recommends to the Board sound corporate governance principles and practices for Greenhill. In particular, the Committee assesses the independence of all Board members, identifies and evaluates candidates for nomination as directors, recommends the slate of director nominees for election at the annual meeting of stockholders and to fill vacancies between annual meetings, recommends qualified members of the Board for membership on committees, oversees the director orientation and continuing education programs, reviews the Board’s committee structure, reviews and assesses the adequacy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, evaluates the annual evaluation process for the Board and Board committees and is charged with overseeing our Related Person Transaction Policy. The Nominating and Governance Committee met two times during 2022.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our directors are expected to attend meetings of the Board and of the committees on which they serve. We do not have a policy requiring directors to attend our annual meeting of stockholders. The Board met six times during 2022. All of our directors attended the annual meeting of stockholders in 2022, and all of our directors attended 100% of the Board and committee meetings on which the directors served. All directors standing for reelection plan to attend the 2023 annual meeting.

In evaluating the appropriate characteristics of candidates for service as a director, the Nominating and Governance Committee takes into account many factors. At a minimum, director candidates must demonstrate high standards of ethics, integrity and professionalism, independence, sound judgment, community leadership and meaningful experience in business, law or finance or other appropriate endeavor. In addition, the candidates must be committed to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders. In addition to these minimum qualifications, the Committee also considers other factors it deems appropriate based on the current needs of the Board, including specific business and financial expertise currently desired on the Board, experience as a director of a public company and self-identified diversity characteristics. With these factors and characteristics in mind, the Committee will generally begin its search by discussing potential candidates with existing members of the Board and management. The Committee will also reassess the qualifications of a director, including the director’s past contributions to the Board and the director’s attendance and contributions at Board and committee meetings, prior to recommending a director for reelection to another term.

Our Board has adopted procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to the Board. On March 4, 2020, the Board amended the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) to implement proxy access. The Bylaws, as amended and restated, include a section that sets forth the circumstances under which stockholders may include nominees for director in our annual meeting proxy materials. Accordingly, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider any director candidate recommended by stockholders in accordance with the procedures set out in our bylaws and applicable law on the same basis as it considers other director candidates. Stockholders may also submit a letter and relevant information about the candidate to the Corporate Secretary at Greenhill & Co., Inc., 1271 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10020.

Our Board, under the guidance of the Nominating and Governance Committee, reviews the structure of our Board and its committees each year as a part of its annual self-evaluation process, and in that context considers, among other things, issues of structure and leadership, including whether the offices of Chairman of the Board and CEO should be combined or separate, and whether the Board’s leadership structure is appropriate given the characteristics or circumstances of the Company. The Board believes that having Mr. Bok serve as both CEO and Chairman of the Board is the most appropriate leadership structure for the Company at this time. Mr. Bok is the director most familiar with the Company’s business operations and the industry in which it operates, and best positioned to set and execute the Company’s business strategies. In addition, we believe the combined role of Chairman and CEO provides enhanced efficiency, effective decision making and clear accountability. If the Board determines in the future to separate the roles of Chairman and CEO, the Company’s stockholders will be notified.

Management is principally responsible for managing risks within the businesses on a day-to-day basis. The Board has delegated oversight of risk management to the Audit Committee, and our Lead Independent Director, Mr. Liu, is a member of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee receives from management regular reports on risk matters, including financial, legal and regulatory risks, at its quarterly meetings. The Audit Committee also receives an annual report on compliance matters from the Chief Compliance Officer. The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s periodic risk assessments and risk-based internal audits. In addition, members of the Audit Committee speak regularly with the Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer of Greenhill as well as its external and internal auditors, to discuss issues related to risk management. The Audit Committee, in turn, reports any material risk issues which may arise to the full Board.

It is our policy to ask our non-employee directors to retain any stock granted to them as compensation, or purchased by them on the open market, until such time as they complete their service on the Board, subject to exceptions for unforeseen personal circumstances. As of December 31, 2022, all of our non-employee directors owned stock in the Company. Our non-employee directors are also prohibited from hedging or otherwise disposing of the economic risk of ownership of any of our shares owned by them through short sales, option transactions or other derivative instruments. We believe this further supports the alignment of the interests of our non-employee directors with those of our stockholders.

Our non-employee directors will be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their service on the Board and the Board committees. Employees of Greenhill who also serve as directors receive compensation for their services as employees, but they do not receive any additional compensation for their service as directors. No other compensation is paid to our Board members in their capacity as directors. Non-employee directors do not participate in our employee benefit plans. See discussion under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions—Related Transactions Involving our Directors and Executive Officers—Other Compensation” for a description of the compensation paid to Robert F. Greenhill, who is the Chairman Emeritus of our Board and an employee of Greenhill, but is not an executive officer, and see discussion under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for discussion of the compensation paid to Scott L. Bok, our CEO and Chairman of our Board.

We have adopted a written related person transaction policy, which is administered by the Nominating and Governance Committee. This policy applies to any transaction or series of related transactions or any material amendment to any such transaction involving a related person and the Company or any subsidiary of the Company. For the purposes of the policy, “related persons” consist of executive officers, directors, director nominees, any stockholder beneficially owning more than 5% of the Company’s common stock, and immediate family members of any such persons. Under the policy, the transaction will be referred to the General Counsel, the CEO and/or the Nominating and Governance Committee for review depending on the identity of the “related person.” Such reviewer will review, approve or ratify the transaction, taking into account all relevant facts and circumstances, including without limitation the commercial reasonableness, the benefit and perceived benefit or lack thereof, to the Company, the availability and/or opportunity costs of alternate transactions, the materiality and character of the related person’s direct or indirect interest, and the actual or apparent conflict of interest of the related person. No reviewer may participate in any review, approval or ratification of any related person transaction in which such reviewer or any of his or her immediate family members is the related person. All determinations by the CEO or the General Counsel under the policy will be reported to the Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting or earlier if appropriate.

Beginning on January 1, 2020, Mr. Greenhill became a Senior Advisor and his annual base salary was adjusted to $100,000. Mr. Greenhill is also entitled to participate in all of our employee benefit plans, including, without limitation, our group health, dental and life insurance plans, 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Equity Incentive Plan. The employment agreement may be terminated by either party on 90 days’ notice. Under the agreement, Mr. Greenhill is subject to limitations on his ability to compete with us during the term of his employment and for a three-month period thereafter. He is also prohibited from soliciting certain of our employees for a period of six months following the termination of his employment. In addition, he is subject to obligations of confidentiality and is required to protect and use confidential information in accordance with the restrictions placed by us on its use and disclosure.

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and regulations of the SEC require our directors, officers and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, as well as certain affiliates of such persons, to file initial reports of their ownership of our equity securities and subsequent reports of changes in such ownership with the SEC. Directors, officers and persons owning more than 10% of a registered class of our common stock are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such reports provided by the reporting persons or their respective brokers and on information known to us regarding changes in ownership, we believe that our directors, officers and owners of more than 10% of our common stock are compliant with all applicable filing requirements.

Our Board maintains a “pay for performance” philosophy that forms the foundation for Compensation Committee decisions regarding executive compensation. In addition, our compensation programs are designed to facilitate strong corporate governance. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis portion of this proxy statement contains a detailed description of our executive compensation philosophy and programs, the compensation decisions the Compensation Committee has made under those programs and the factors considered in making those decisions, including 2022 Company and individual performance, focusing on the compensation of our NEOs. Our stockholders affirmed their support of our programs in last year’s Say on Pay results. We believe that we have created a compensation program deserving of stockholder support and we encourage our stockholders to read our Compensation Discussion and Analysis in its entirety.

Greenhill’s 2022 Business Performance. For the year ended December 31, 2022, Greenhill generated revenue of $258.5 million, or a decrease of 19% from 2021. The decrease in our 2022 revenues, as compared to 2021, principally resulted from global market uncertainty and volatility caused by inflationary pressures, slowing global growth, rising interest rates, and the war in Ukraine, among other things, which adversely impacted the level of M&A activity substantially from the rapid pace of 2021. For us, we realized significantly fewer transaction completions, particularly in the first half of the year, while in the second half of the year the pace of completions accelerated despite a number of transactions carrying over to the next year.

Executive Pay Program Updates and Say-on-Pay Vote. Our compensation philosophy is designed to enable us to be competitive in the market for recruiting and retaining top talent, while also providing that our NEOs’ pay reflects both individual and company performance and is aligned with increasing value to our stockholders. At our 2022 annual meeting 96% of votes cast were in favor of our say-on-pay resolution and over the past five years we have experienced strong stockholder support with over 90% of our stockholders casting votes in support of Greenhill’s executive compensation program at our annual meetings. We believe the positive results of our say-on-pay votes are consistent with our view that our executive compensation program is appropriate and is responsive to our stockholder’s views.

2022 CEO Compensation. In light of the Firm’s performance in 2022, including a 19% decline in revenues, the Compensation Committee has reduced Mr. Bok’s total annual pay by approximately 12% from 2021. Similar to 2021, our CEO was granted a significant portion of his long term incentive compensation in performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) to further align incentive compensation to future financial performance and shareholder return. The PRSUs awarded for the 2022 performance period tie 2023 to 2025 compensation outcomes for our CEO to multi-year revenue, operating margin and total stockholder return (“TSR”) goals, each equally weighted, as described below in “CEO PRSU Awards”.

Our compensation ratio is determined by management in consultation with the Compensation Committee at each year end and is based on factors such as the relative level of revenues, anticipated compensation requirements to retain and reward our employees, the cost to recruit and exit employees, the charge for amortization of restricted stock and deferred cash compensation awards and related forfeitures, among others. Our consistent goal, over time, has been to align a substantial portion of the compensation of our senior employees with our stockholders through the award of restricted stock units and to provide our stockholders with prudent growth, robust profitability and strong return of capital.

Our compensation program is designed to attract, retain and motivate our professionals, reward the achievement of business results through the delivery of competitive pay and align the aggregate compensation of our employees through incentive programs with both individual and company performance. We periodically review our program and engage with our stockholders in order to gauge whether our program should be updated for changes in governance and market practices, and accordingly, our program includes several features that further our aim of rewarding our executives for performance-based results.


			Grant PRSUs as part of CEO’s incentive compensation						Exercise discretion to be responsive to the cyclical nature of our business and advance our goal of operating as a meritocracy
			Retain an independent compensation consultant to assist the Compensation Committee						Require double-trigger vesting for equity awards under a change in control scenario
			Review and consider stockholder feedback in structuring executive compensation						Design incentive compensation programs taking into account tax deductibility
			Provide broad ability to Compensation Committee to clawback deferred retention compensation, which is the largest component of NEO compensation						Maintain stock ownership guidelines for all NEOs, which guidelines are currently exceeded
			Apply multi-year vesting requirements, generally 3-5 years, to equity awards						Maintain Pay for Performance
			Award equity compensation to new senior hires and as part of annual incentive compensation for alignment of interests with stockholders						Hold annual Say-on-Pay vote


Principles of Compensation Policy
Alignment			Further align interests between all our senior professionals (including our NEOs) and our stockholders
Simplicity			Sponsor transparency by permitting our senior professionals and our stockholders to readily calculate the costs and benefits of the compensation we provide
Meritocracy (within the Firm)			Promote meritocracy through a robust and fair compensation methodology which encourages our senior professionals to work together even more effectively in order to better advise clients
Effectiveness			Attract, retain and incentivize talent in a highly competitive industry

Compensation Process. The Compensation Committee, which consists entirely of independent outside directors, has the overall responsibility for evaluating and approving our executive officer base salaries and annual and long-term incentive compensation. The Compensation Committee maintains a dialogue with our management and its independent consultant regarding compensation, industry practices and the contributions of individual executives, and we periodically solicit feedback from our stockholders, all of which are taken into account in determining compensation. The various factors taken into account by our Compensation Committee in the process are illustrated as follows:

For purposes of determining the annual incentive compensation of our NEOs, our Compensation Committee principally evaluates the Company’s annual financial results and stockholder return, but also considers other factors, including management responsibilities, leadership role, and where applicable, the development of client relationships and execution of client engagements. Scott Bok, our Chairman and CEO, after consulting with other key executives, makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding both the form and amount of base salary and annual and long-term incentive compensation for each NEO (other than himself) and other senior professionals each year.

In approving NEO compensation decisions with respect to 2022, our Compensation Committee considered a variety of factors, including the following: (i) the Firm’s 2022 performance versus the prior year and versus its peers; (ii) the successful recruitment, promotion and retention of senior professionals, and (iii) with respect to those NEOs who are actively involved in advising clients and generating revenue (among the NEO’s, our Chairman/CEO and our Presidents), of their individual contributions to building client relationships, winning assignments, executing transactions and generating revenue for the Firm. With respect to our Chairman/CEO, in particular, the Compensation Committee determined his 2022 compensation on the merits of his performance both as an executive in relation to the Firm’s overall results and as an investment banker, while taking into consideration market conditions and other relevant factors. For more detail on the Compensation Committee’s considerations for our NEO’s 2022 compensation, see below under “2022 Total Direct Compensation”.

Independent Consultant. During 2022, pursuant to its authority to retain independent advisors under its charter, the Compensation Committee again retained Compensation Advisory Partners LLC (“CAP”) as its independent compensation consultant. CAP assisted the Compensation Committee by preparing analyses and making recommendations to inform the Compensation Committee’s decisions, in particular those related to Chairman/CEO compensation. The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of CAP pursuant to SEC and NYSE rules, and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent CAP from providing independent advice to the Compensation Committee. CAP met with the Compensation Committee Chair outside the presence of management and will perform no other services for the Firm without the consent of the Compensation Committee Chair.

Mr. Bok’s incentive compensation has historically been in the form of RSUs and/or PRSUs, with no cash bonuses paid since 2010. With respect to Mr. Bok’s 2022 compensation, the Compensation Committee approved $50,000 of base compensation and long-term incentive compensation of $3,650,000, consisting of a RSU award of $2,150,000, which will vest in full on January 1, 2026, and a PRSU award of $1,500,000, which represents approximately 35% of his total annual pay. The PRSU award is fully at-risk based on performance outcomes over a three-year period as more fully described below under “CEO PRSU Awards”. Incentive awards constituted 99% of Mr. Bok’s total compensation in 2022. Total deferred equity compensation awards constituted 100% and 99% of Mr. Bok’s total incentive compensation and total compensation, respectively, for 2022. Providing Mr. Bok’s incentive compensation in RSUs and PRSUs rather than cash directly aligned nearly all of his compensation with the interests of our stockholders.

Mr. Bok has consistently demonstrated his commitment to the Firm and alignment with our stockholders. For example, in conjunction with the recapitalization in 2017, Mr. Bok requested, and the Compensation Committee determined, to reduce his base salary for the five-year period beginning January 1, 2018 by more than 90%, or $2,750,000 in the aggregate. Accordingly, Mr. Bok’s annual base salary was reduced from $600,000 to $50,000. In recognition of this reduction in base salary, the Compensation Committee determined to provide Mr. Bok a grant of PRSUs in 2017 that were linked to the successful repayment of the borrowing used to fund the recapitalization. The PRSU grant was valued at $2,750,000 at the grant date. These PRSUs were granted on September 25, 2017 at $14.40 per share and vested in September 2022 at $10.06 per share. The Compensation Committee determined that the April 2019 refinancing of the Company’s borrowings satisfied the performance criteria of the award. Mr. Bok’s base salary reverted to $600,000 beginning in 2023 as the five year agreement related to the 2017 PRSU grant period has expired.

Our Other NEOs. With respect to the compensation of our other NEOs, Mr. Bok’s recommendations to the Compensation Committee focused on the relative importance of the roles played by such officers and their overall contributions to the Firm, including, where relevant, their roles in developing client relationships, executing client engagements and generating revenue and, in all cases, the complexity and difficulty of the leadership and administrative roles played by such officer, as well as the importance of retaining such officer.

Mr. Costantino. In recommending annual incentive compensation for Mr. Costantino, Mr. Bok considered Mr. Costantino’s role as a senior banker developing key client relationships, executing client engagements and generating revenue, while also playing a senior management and leadership role within the Firm. As President, Mr. Costantino plays a central role in managing key client relationships, monitoring business activity across the Firm, managing Firm personnel, recruiting new talent to the Firm and pursuing new strategic opportunities for the Firm. The Compensation Committee approved $600,000 of base

compensation and the following incentive compensation for Mr. Costantino for his performance in 2022: an RSU award valued at $550,000 that will vest ratably over four years and a deferred cash award valued at $550,000 that will also vest ratably over a four year period. Incentive awards and total long-term deferred compensation awards constituted 61% of Mr. Costantino’s total compensation for 2022 to both align a substantial portion of his compensation with the interests of our stockholders (through the grant of RSUs) and encourage long-term retention. In addition, on February 27, 2023, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Costantino an additional 2023 retention cash award for $500,000 that is payable in April 2023, subject to continued employment and inclusive of a clawback provision until the end of the 2023 fiscal year.

Mr. Wyles. In recommending annual incentive compensation for Mr. Wyles, Mr. Bok considered Mr. Wyles’ role as a senior banker developing key client relationships, executing client engagements and generating revenue, while also playing a senior management and leadership role within the Firm. As President, Mr. Wyles plays a central role in managing key client relationships, monitoring business activity across the Firm, managing Firm personnel, recruiting new talent to the Firm and pursuing new strategic opportunities for the Firm. The Compensation Committee approved $488,813 of base compensation and the following incentive compensation for Mr. Wyles for his performance in 2022: an RSU award valued at $375,000 that will vest ratably over four years and a deferred cash award valued at $375,000 that will also vest ratably over a four year period. Incentive awards and total long-term deferred compensation awards constituted 54% of Mr. Wyles’ total compensation for 2022 to both align a substantial portion of his compensation with the interests of our stockholders (through the grant of RSUs) and to encourage long-term retention. In addition, on February 27, 2023, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Wyles an additional 2023 retention cash award for $254,059 that is payable in April 2023, subject to continued employment and inclusive of a clawback provision until the end of the 2023 fiscal year.

Mr. Rodriguez. In recommending annual incentive compensation for Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Bok considered the various roles that Mr. Rodriguez performs for the Firm, including as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Among other things, he considered Mr. Rodriguez’s responsibility for corporate finance and accounting at the Firm, managing the Firm’s expenses apart from compensation, ongoing management and oversight of the operating risks of the business, and establishing and implementing uniform internal policies within the Firm. The Compensation Committee approved $600,000 of base compensation and the following incentive compensation for Mr. Rodriguez for his performance in 2022 of a deferred cash award valued at $900,000, consisting of cash payments that will vest $400,000 on December 29, 2023 and $500,000 on January 31, 2024. The vesting period was shortened to coincide with Mr. Rodriguez’s transition from the Chief Financial Officer to Senior Advisor during 2023. Incentive awards constituted 56% of total compensation for 2022. Mr. Rodriguez transitioned from his role as Chief Financial Officer to that of a Senior Advisor on March 1, 2023. He will assist the current officers of the Firm on discrete projects when requested by the CEO.

Ms. Faleiro. In recommending annual incentive compensation for Ms. Faleiro, Mr. Bok considered the various roles that Ms. Faleiro performs for the Firm, including as the General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary. Among other things, he considered Ms. Faleiro’s responsibility for overseeing global legal matters and regulatory compliance at the Firm, advising the Firm’s professionals on client engagements, and designing and implementing uniform internal policies with regard to legal and compliance matters. The Compensation Committee approved $475,000 of base compensation and the following incentive compensation for Ms. Faleiro for her performance in 2022: an RSU award valued at $201,250 that will vest ratably over four years and a deferred cash award valued at $201,250 that will also vest ratably over a four year period. Incentive compensation constituted 46% of Ms. Faleiro’s total compensation in 2022 and 100% of long-term deferred compensation awards to align a portion of her compensation with the interests of our stockholders (through the grant of RSUs) and to encourage long-term retention. In addition, on February 27, 2023, the Compensation Committee granted Ms. Faleiro an additional 2023 retention cash award for $272,500 that is payable in April 2023, subject to continued employment and inclusive of a clawback provision until the end of the 2023 fiscal year.

In February 2023, as part of our Chairman/CEO’s annual incentive compensation for the 2022 performance year, our Compensation Committee awarded 134,892 PRSUs with three-year prospective goals. The PRSUs pay out, if at all, based on 2023 to 2025 revenue, operating margin and TSR goals, each equally weighted and individually tracked. Any compensation ultimately earned for the award will be based on performance during the three-year period ended December 31, 2025, and will vest immediately following. If the achievement of a performance metric is below the threshold goal, the payout factor for such performance metric will be 0%. The maximum payout under the award is 250% of the target number of stock units, or 337,230 units, plus the cumulative dividends paid on the underlying shares during the performance period. If a performance metric exceeds the threshold goal and falls in between any of the other stated goals, interpolation of the two closest goals will be utilized in calculating a payout factor. The emphasis on awards granted against the three-year goals represents our continued desire to align personal and Firm performance with the interests of our stockholders. Under the terms of the PRSU award for the 2022 performance year, Mr. Bok is required to hold any shares that vest under the award for at least two years following the end of the performance period. Since this award is based on cumulative financial targets over a three year period and we are unable to forecast our share price at the end of the period, we are unable to predict whether any compensation will ultimately be earned from this award.

In February 2022, as part of our Chairman/CEO’s annual incentive compensation for the 2021 performance year, our Compensation Committee awarded 90,799 PRSUs with three-year prospective goals. The PRSUs pay out, if at all, based on 2022 to 2024 revenue, operating margin and TSR goals, each equally weighted and individually tracked. If the achievement of a performance metric is below the threshold goal, the payout factor for such performance metric will be 0%. The maximum payout under the award is 250% of the target number of stock units, or 226.998 units, plus the cumulative dividends paid on the underlying shares during the performance period. If a performance metric exceeds the threshold goal and falls in between any of the other stated goals, interpolation of the two closest goals will be utilized in calculating a payout factor. Any compensation ultimately earned for the award will be based on performance during the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, and will vest immediately following. The emphasis on awards granted against the three-year goals represents our continued desire to align personal and Firm performance with the interests of our stockholders. Under the terms of the PRSU award for the 2021 performance year, Mr. Bok is required to hold any shares that vest under the award for at least two years following the end of the performance period.

In February 2021, our Chairman/CEO was awarded 126,050 PRSUs based on 2021 to 2023 revenue, operating margin and TSR goals, each equally weighted and individually tracked. Any compensation ultimately earned for the award will be based on performance during the three-year period ended December 31, 2023. If the achievement of a performance metric is below the threshold goal, the payout factor for such performance metric will be 0%. The maximum payout under the award is 250% of the target number of stock units, or 315.125 units, plus the cumulative dividends paid on the underlying shares during the performance period. If a performance metric exceeds the threshold goal and falls in between any of the other stated goals, interpolation of the two closest goals will be utilized in calculating a payout factor. Any compensation ultimately earned for the award will be based on performance during the three-year period ended December 31, 2023, and will vest immediately following. Under the terms of the PRSU award for the 2020 performance year, Mr. Bok is required to hold any shares that vest under the award for at least two years following the end of the performance period.

Relative Pay Levels/Practices. The Compensation Committee, working with management, developed a group of peer companies which it believes provides a meaningful gauge of current pay practices and levels, as well as overall compensation trends: Evercore Partners, Houlihan Lokey, Lazard, Moelis & Co., PJT Partners and Stifel Financial Corp. For purposes of 2022 compensation, the Compensation Committee reviewed an analysis prepared by CAP regarding CEO compensation levels for 2021 (the most recent year for which comprehensive data for our peers was available), and expectations for 2022 year-end compensation decisions, for comparable positions at these firms. We considered the level of compensation paid by the firms in the peer group in connection with our 2022 compensation decisions; however, the Compensation Committee did not target compensation at a particular level relative to the peer group. Rather, this information was one of several data points considered. To the extent investors use a peer group for the Firm to benchmark pay levels or pay practices, we believe this is a reasonable group of companies, considering size and business model.

No Guarantees. We historically have had a “no guarantees” policy (with exceptions typically only for the initial period of employment of newly recruited NEOs and other senior professionals) and no contractual entitlement to severance. To provide further flexibility with respect to employment and compensation matters, we historically have maintained a termination practice with no contractual rights to continued employment (other than for a brief notice period) and no contractual right to severance upon termination.

Clawbacks. The Compensation Committee, in cases where it reasonably determines to be appropriate (not only in cases of narrowly defined actions by the NEO or employee that would constitute “cause” for termination), has discretion to cancel all unvested deferred compensation awards upon termination of a NEO or employee pursuant to the Clawback Policy. Because a significant portion of compensation to NEOs and other senior professionals is in the form of deferred compensation awards, which generally vest over three to four years, the Compensation Committee effectively has the ability to terminate unvested deferred compensation awards and thereby clawback a significant portion of all unvested compensation awarded to an individual in the prior three to four years. In addition, recent cash retention awards are subject to continued employment at the time of payment and inclusive of a clawback provision until the end of the 2023 fiscal year.

The Compensation Committee reviews the ownership level for covered executives each year, using a twelve month average stock price. As of the measurement of ownership for 2022, all NEOs currently subject to these ownership guidelines were compliant. By way of illustration, our CEO Mr. Bok is required under the guidelines to attain a level of ownership representing 10x his base salary, but in fact has far surpassed such minimum threshold and beneficially owns 16.1% of the outstanding securities of the Company before inclusion of his RSU and PRSU awards.

Tax Deductibility of Compensation. Historically, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limited deductions for non-performance-based annual compensation in excess of $1.0 million paid to certain executive officers. Our policy was designed generally to maximize the tax deductibility of compensation payments to our executive officers pursuant to available exemptions under that provision, although we retained discretion to authorize payments to executive officers that may not be fully deductible if we believed that such payments are in our stockholders’ interests. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “TCJA”) and recent guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) eliminated the exemption for performance-based compensation from Section 162(m) for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017. Compensation paid to our covered officers in excess of $1.0 million therefore will not be deductible. The Compensation Committee will continue to monitor the application and impact, if any, of the TCJA and any relevant IRS guidance on the Company’s compensation programs.

Risk Related to Compensation Policies. Our Firm-wide year-end discretionary compensation program is designed to reflect the performance of the Firm and the performance of the individual employee, and we believe its design discourages excessive risk taking. For example, paying a significant portion of our year-end compensation in the form of deferred compensation awards, including, with respect to our CEO, PRSUs in certain years, all with multi-year vesting periods, encourages each of our senior professionals to be sensitive to long-term risk outcomes, as the value of their awards increase or decrease with the price of our common stock. The Compensation Committee’s ability to clawback awards in certain situations, as discussed above, also aids in this regard. In addition, our NEOs are prohibited from hedging or pledging their stock and are subject to stock ownership requirements. We believe these criteria will provide our employees additional incentives to prudently manage the range of risks inherent in our business. Based on this, we do not believe that our compensation policies and practices create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Firm.

2022 Summary Compensation Table (1)


Name	Year	Salary			Bonus			Stock Awards (2)			All Other Compen-sation (3)			Total
Scott L. Bok	2022	$	50,000	(4)	$	—		$	4,200,000	(13)	$	219,618	(15)	$	4,469,618
Chief Executive Officer	2021	50,000		(4)	—			4,193,700		(14)	—			4,243,700
	2020	50,000		(4)	—			2,700,000			—			2,750,000

Kevin M. Costantino	2022	600,000			—		(5)	1,250,000			113,793		(16)	1,963,793
President	2021	600,000			150,000		(6)	950,000			971,171		(17)	2,671,171
	2020	600,000			1,300,000		(7)	3,150,000			8,900		(16)	5,058,900

David A. Wyles *	2022	488,813			—		(5)	1,250,000			131,987		(18)	1,870,800
President	2021	543,402			198,674		(8)	3,000,000			26,277		(18)	3,768,353
	2020	507,062			2,487,393		(9)	483,711			23,365		(18)	3,501,531

Harold J. Rodriguez, Jr.	2022	600,000			—			875,000			105,986		(19)	1,580,986
Chief Financial Officer	2021	600,000			275,000		(10)	1,150,000			—		(19)	2,025,000
	2020	600,000			—			1,400,000			5,574		(19)	2,005,574

Gitanjali Pinto Faleiro	2022	475,000			—		(5)	357,500			161,577		(20)	994,077
	2021	450,000			135,000		(11)	140,000			141,638		(21)	866,638
General Counsel	2020	350,000			370,000		(12)	200,000			362		(22)	920,362

* Mr. Wyles performed services in the UK and, accordingly, the Company paid compensation to Mr. Wyles in pound sterling (GBP). With respect to his base salary, GBP was converted into dollars using a monthly exchange rate as published in Bloomberg. With respect to his bonus and amounts related to all other compensation, such amounts were determined as of the date of the applicable payment for interim payments and at the year-end rate for amounts earned as part of year-end awards and converted from GBP into dollars using the rates published in Bloomberg for such date.

(2) These amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 of awards made pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan in the referenced fiscal year. See Note 2 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and Note 13 (Deferred Compensation—RSUs) to our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022 included in our most recent Form 10-K filed with the SEC. In addition, on February 27, 2023, our NEOs were granted additional awards of RSUs under our Equity Incentive Plan in respect of 2022 performance as follows: Mr. Bok, 193,345 RSUs; Mr. Costantino, 49,460 RSUs; Mr. Wyles, 33,723 RSUs; and Ms. Faleiro 18,098 RSUs, which are not reflected in this table. Mr. Bok’s awards will vest in full on January 1, 2026. Messrs. Costantino’s and Wyles’ and Ms. Faleiro’s awards will vest in equal installments over four years, as follows: 25% will vest on January 1, 2024, 25% will vest on January 1, 2025, 25% will vest on January 1, 2026 and 25% will vest on January 1, 2027. In addition, in February 27, 2023, the Company awarded 134,892 PRSUs to Mr. Bok (which will vest, if at all, based on performance during the three-year period ended December 31, 2025), although such award is intended to compensate for future performance rather than be provided in respect of 2022 performance.

(3) On February 27, 2023, our Compensation Committee granted select NEOs additional deferred cash awards in respect of 2022 performance as follows: Mr. Costantino, $550,000; Mr. Wyles, $375,000; Mr. Rodriguez $900,000 and Ms. Faleiro $201,250, which are not reflected in this table. Subject to continued employment, Messrs. Costantino’s and Wyles’ and Ms. Faleiro’s awards will vest in equal installments over four years, as follows: 25% will vest on January 1, 2024, 25% will vest on January 1, 2025, 25% will vest on January 1, 2026 and 25% will vest on January 1, 2027. The granted awards to Mr. Rodriguez will vest as follows: $400,000 on December 29, 2023 and $500,000 on January 31, 2024.

(4) On September 25, 2017, our Compensation Committee approved a reduction in Mr. Bok’s base salary from $600,000 to $50,000, effective as of January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2022. In exchange for forgoing more than 90% of his base salary over such five-year period (i.e. a $550,000 reduction per year for five years), the Compensation Committee approved, on the same date, the grant of a $2,750,000 award of PRSUs to Mr. Bok. Mr. Bok’s base salary reverted to $600,000 beginning in 2023 as the five year agreement related to the 2017 PRSU grant period has expired.


Name	Grant Date	Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (Target) (1)	Estimated Possible Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards			All Other Stock Awards; Number of Shares of Stock or Units (2)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards (3)
			Threshold	Target	Maximum
Scott L. Bok	2/1/2022	See Note 1	—	—	—	163,438	(A)	$	2,700,000
Scott L. Bok	2/1/2022	See Note 1	45,400	90,799	226,998	—		1,500,000
Kevin M. Costantino	2/1/2022	See Note 1	—	—	—	30,266	(A)	500,000
Kevin M. Costantino	2/1/2022	See Note 1	—	—	—	45,400	(B)	750,000
David A. Wyles	2/1/2022	See Note 1	—	—	—	30,266	(A)	500,000
David A. Wyles	2/1/2022	See Note 1	—	—	—	45,400	(B)	750,000
Harold J. Rodriguez, Jr.	2/1/2022	See Note 1	—	—	—	52,966	(A)	875,000
Gitanjali Pinto Faleiro	2/1/2022	See Note 1	—	—	—	12,107	(A)	200,000
Gitanjali Pinto Faleiro	2/1/2022	See Note 1	—	—	—	9,534	(B)	157,500

(1) As described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Our Compensation Program Design” above, the NEOs are eligible for an annual incentive compensation award in the form of a cash payment. The actual amounts paid to our NEOs are determined by our Compensation Committee once the available annual incentive compensation award pool is known and are subject to a percentage cap on each NEO’s potential annual incentive compensation award which is established by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of each performance period.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2022




Name	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (1)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (2)
Scott L. Bok	117,017	(A)	1,199,424
	328,867	(B)	3,370,887
	63,025	(C)	646,006
	226,891	(D)	2,325,633
	45,400	(E)	465,350
	163,438	(F)	1,675,240
	944,638		9,682,540
Kevin M. Costantino	16,958	(G)	173,820
	191,839	(H)	1,966,350
	59,874	(I)	613,709
	45,400	(J)	465,350
	30,266	(F)	310,227
	344,337		3,529,456
David A. Wyles	20,429	(G)	209,397
	29,459	(H)	301,955
	189,076	(I)	1,938,029
	45,400	(J)	465,350
	30,266	(F)	310,227
	314,630		3,224,958
Harold J. Rodriguez, Jr.	49,583	(K)	508,226
	170,524	(B)	1,747,871
	96,639	(D)	990,550
	52,966	(F)	542,902
	369,712		3,789,549
Gitanjali Pinto Faleiro	1,811	(L)	18,563
	12,181	(H)	124,855
	8,824	(I)	90,446
	9,534	(J)	97,724
	12,107	(F)	124,097
	44,457		455,685

None of our NEOs or other employees have any severance agreements or arrangements (including pursuant to the employment agreements described below). However, our Equity Incentive Plans provides that upon the (i) death, (ii) disability, (iii) retirement or (iv) termination of employment without cause (as determined by our Compensation Committee) within two years following a change in control (as defined in the Equity Incentive Plan) or six months prior to a change in control if the Compensation Committee reasonably believes such termination was at the behest of an acquiring entity, any RSU previously granted will immediately become fully vested (which we refer to as the acceleration provision). The acceleration provision applies to the RSUs held by all of our employees. For any RSU with performance conditions, following termination without cause related to a change in control (as previously described), performance will be deemed to have been satisfied as of the change in control at the greater of (A) the target performance level or (B) actual level of performance achieved through the date of such change in control. Had the acceleration provision been triggered on December 31, 2022, the value of shares of our common stock to be delivered on that date to our NEOs would have been as follows (calculated using the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2022 of $10.25): Mr. Bok, $9,682,540; Mr. Costantino, $3,529,456; Mr. Wyles, $3,224,958; Mr. Rodriguez, $3,789,549; and Ms. Faleiro, $455,685.

The employment agreements of Messrs. Bok and Rodriguez provide that they will be paid an annual base salary of $600,000, subject to annual review by the Company, and that they may be awarded a bonus in an amount to be determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee. These employment agreements are terminable by either party on 90 days’ prior written notice, with no contractual rights to severance. Mr. Costantino and Mr. Wyles are not party to an employment agreement with us. All of our NEOs are subject to limitations on their ability to compete with us during the term of their employment and for a three month period thereafter; they are also prohibited from soliciting certain of our employees and customers for a period of six months following the termination of their employment.

The following is a reasonable estimate, prepared under applicable SEC rules, of the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of our other employees. The information presented below represents our median employee for 2022. In addition, we have provided ratio information with respect to our CEO’s compensation as determined in the manner required by the applicable SEC rules, as well as the ratio as determined based on the manner that our Compensation Committee considers it, which we view as a more meaningful reference point for our stockholders.

For 2022, the median annual total compensation of all employees, excluding our CEO, was $215,000. As disclosed in the 2022 Summary Compensation Table, the 2022 annual total compensation of our CEO was $4,469,618. Based on the foregoing, our estimate of the ratio of the CEO’s annual total compensation to the median annual compensation of all employees was 21 to 1. If the 2022 annual compensation of our CEO was calculated in the manner that our Compensation Committee considers it, the total annual compensation of our CEO for 2022 was $3,919,618 and the ratio of the CEO’s annual total compensation to the median annual compensation of all employees would have been 18 to 1.

Under Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 rules, which was established by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and the related SEC rules promulgated thereunder, at least once every six years we must hold an advisory vote on whether to present to stockholders an advisory vote on executive compensation every year, every two years or every three years. We held a say-on-pay frequency vote in 2017 and 2011 and currently conduct an annual say-on-pay vote.

As noted above, our compensation philosophy is designed to enable us to be competitive in the market for recruiting and retaining top talent, while also providing that our NEOs’ pay reflects both individual and company performance and is aligned with increasing value to our stockholders. Over the past four years we have experienced strong stockholder support with over 90% of our stockholders casting votes in support of Greenhill’s executive compensation program at our annual meetings. We believe the positive results of our say-on-pay votes are consistent with our view that our executive compensation program is appropriate and is responsive to our stockholder’s views.

Management is responsible for Greenhill’s system of internal controls and the financial reporting process. Ernst & Young LLP is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB (United States) standards and issuing a report thereon. Our Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes. Based on the foregoing review and discussions and a review of the report of Ernst & Young LLP with respect to the consolidated financial statements, and relying thereon, we have recommended to Greenhill’s Board of Directors the inclusion of the audited consolidated financial statements in Greenhill’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, for filing with the SEC.

The Audit Committee has adopted an auditor services pre-approval policy applicable to services performed for us by our independent auditors. In accordance with this policy, the Committee’s practice is to approve annually all audit services and, on a case-by-case basis, recurring permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditor during the fiscal year. The Audit Committee approved all of the fees listed in the table above. The Audit Committee reviews each non-audit service to be provided and assesses the impact of the service on the auditor’s independence. In addition, the Audit Committee may pre-approve other non-audit services during the year on a case-by-case basis, and delegate authority to grant such pre-approvals during the year to the Chair of the Audit Committee, so long as the Chair informs the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid (as defined by SEC rules) and certain financial performance of the company. The Compensation Committee did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure when making its compensation decisions. For further information about how we align executive compensation with the company's performance, please refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis,

3 To calculate the Compensation Actually Paid (CAP) for the PEO, adjustments to the SCT total compensation, calculated in accordance with the SEC methodology for determining CAP include: (i) a deduction of the RSU awards of $4,200,000 and $4,193,700 granted in 2022 and 2021, respectively, (ii) the addition of share price (depreciation)/appreciation on unvested RSU/PRSU awards of ($5,841,508) and $8,753,724 in years 2022 and 2021, respectively (iii) the addition of accrued dividends on RSUs of $326,402 and $172,749 in years 2022 and 2021, respectively and (iv) a deduction of dividends paid on RSUs of $219,619 and nil in years 2022 and 2021, respectively.

4 To calculate the Average CAP to non-PEO NEOs, adjustments to the Average SCT total compensation, calculated in accordance with the SEC methodology for determining CAP, and averaged over the two non-PEO NEOs include: (i) a deduction of the average RSU awards of $1,250,000 and $2,450,000 granted in 2022 and 2021, respectively, (ii) the addition of share price (depreciation)/appreciation on unvested, average RSU awards of ($1,620,172) and $3,894,940 in years 2022 and 2021, respectively, (iii) the addition of the average accrued dividends on RSUs of $160,100 and $89,306 in years 2022 and 2021, respectively and (iv) a deduction of average dividends paid on RSUs of $122,891 and $23,723 in years 2022 and 2021, respectively.

The Company expects the following stockholder proposal to be presented for consideration at the annual meeting by John Chevedden, on behalf of Kenneth Steiner, 14 Stoner Avenue, 2M, Great Neck, NY, 11021, who beneficially owned not less than 500 shares of the Company’s common stock as of October 21, 2022. The proposal, along with the supporting statement (the “Stockholder Proposal”), is included below. The Company disclaims any responsibility for the content of this Stockholder Proposal, the text of which, in accordance with rules of the SEC, is printed verbatim from its submission, with only minor formatting changes.

The stockholder proposal maintains that separating the Chair and CEO roles would be better for the Company, but overlooks that the Board is already charged with monitoring its leadership structure and adapting it to fit the Company’s evolving needs and circumstances. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the independent Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is to periodically assess the Board’s leadership structure, including to determine whether the offices of Chair of the Board and CEO should be combined or separate, whether the Company should have a Lead Independent Director in the event that the Chair of the Board is not an independent director, and whether the Board’s leadership structure is appropriate given the characteristics or circumstances of the Company. The independent Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s oversight function in this respect serves to ensure that the Board’s leadership structure is suited to the Company’s interests as circumstances change. By enabling the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to exercise its independent business judgment as to whether the Chair and CEO roles should be combined or not at any given time, the Company’s current governance structure is preferable to the stockholder’s proposed structure, which would require the separation of the Chair and CEO roles in all circumstances.

The Corporate Governance Guidelines further provide that all members of each the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must be independent. The Board’s independent committees are charged with a number of critical functions, including to oversee the internal audit process and integrity of the Company’s financial statements; to establish and administer policies for the compensation of executive officers; and to identify candidates for nomination to the Board and to monitor Board performance. By vesting key functions in its independent committees, the Board is built to have a strong independent foundation and to limit the risk of undue management influence that concerns the stockholder proposal.

Scott L. Bok has served as Chairman since 2019, as CEO since April 2010 and as Co-CEO between October 2007 and April 2010. In addition, Mr. Bok has been a director of Greenhill & Co., Inc. since its incorporation in March 2004. Mr. Bok brings valuable perspective and experience to each of his roles as Chairman and CEO. Mr. Bok is intimately familiar with the Company’s industry and business, and in his dual role as Chairman-CEO, is able to use his knowledge and expertise to facilitate both informed Board decision-making and a clear path of communication and action to Company management.

Similarly, the Company benefits from the leadership and expertise of its Lead Independent Director, John D. Liu. Mr. Liu has served as the Company’s Lead Independent Director since April 2021 and as a director of the Board since June 2017. Mr. Liu is a recognized leader with significant experience in finance and accounting, and the Company benefits from Mr. Liu applying these qualities in his role as Lead Independent Director. The stockholder proposal questions the independence of Mr. Liu, citing his previous employment by Greenhill. However, Mr. Liu left his position at Greenhill in March 2008 in order to serve as CEO of Essex Equity Management, a financial services company, and managing partner of Richmond Hill Investments, an investment management firm. At all times since joining the Board in 2017, Mr. Liu has satisfied the independent director requirements as established by the New York Stock Exchange. He is therefore qualified to serve as our Lead Independent Director and ensure strong independent leadership on the Board.

(A) no earlier than the close of business on January 3, 2024 and no later than the close of business on February 2, 2024 or, (B) in the event that our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders is held prior to April 2, 2024 or after July 11, 2024, notice by the stockholder must be so received no earlier than the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and no later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the annual meeting is first made, and, in each case, must include all of the requirements pursuant to our bylaws. Written notice must be delivered to the Corporate Secretary within these deadlines.

For a stockholder’s notice of nomination of one or more director candidates to be included in our proxy materials for our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders, pursuant to the proxy access right included in Section 2.14 of our Bylaws, such notice of nomination must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no earlier than the close of business on October 16, 2023 and no later than the close of business on November 15, 2023, provided that if the 2024 annual meeting is held prior to April 2, 2024 or after June 1, 2024, such notice must be given by the later of the close of business on the date 180 days prior to the meeting date or the 10th day on which public announcement of the date of the annual meeting is first made. The notice must contain the information required by our Bylaws, and the stockholder(s) and nominee(s) must comply with the information and other requirements in our Bylaws relating to the inclusion of stockholder nominees in our proxy materials.

The 2022 Form 10-K filed with the SEC accompanies this proxy statement. Stockholders who wish to obtain a copy of the 2022 Form 10-K or a copy of any of the charters of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Nominating and Governance Committee, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Related Person Transaction Policy or Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, may do so without charge by viewing these documents on our website at www.greenhill.com or by writing to Greenhill, Attention: Investor Relations, 1271 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10020.


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash		Stock Awards (1)		Total
Ulrika M. Ekman	$	62,504	$	62,496	$	125,000
Kevin T. Ferro	—		124,999		124,999
Meryl D. Hartzband (2)	—		139,994		139,994
John D. Liu	62,496		62,504		125,000


			No multi-year guaranteed bonus arrangements generally						No perks
			No tax gross-ups						No severance agreements
			No single trigger vesting on change in control						No pension benefits
			No hedging or pledging permitted						No repricing of underwater stock options without stockholder approval


2023 - 2025 Performance Period	Average Annual Revenue as Multiple of Base Year	Cumulative Operating Margin	Total Shareholder Return (TSR) (CAGR)	Total Shareholder Return (TSR) (Cumulative)
Threshold Goal (Payout Factor = 50%)	1.1 x 2022 revenue	20%	5%	15.8%
Target Goal (Payout Factor = 100%)	1.15 x 2022 revenue	23%	10%	33.1%
Upside Goal (Payout Factor = 200%)	1.2 x 2022 revenue	24%	15%	52.1%
Maximum Goal (Payout Factor = 250%)	1.25 x 2022 revenue	25%	20%	72.8%


Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting	Value Realized Upon Vesting (1)
Scott L. Bok	190,972	$	1,921,178
Kevin M. Costantino	191,307	3,077,556
David A. Wyles	194,122	4,585,483
Harold J. Rodriguez, Jr.	93,194	937,532
Gitanjali Pinto Faleiro	10,841	187,450


Year	Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO (1)		Compensation Actually Paid to PEO (1) (2) (3)		Average Summary Compen-sation Table Total for non-PEO NEOs (1)		Average Compen-sation Actually Paid to non-PEO NEOs (1) (2) (4)		Value of Initial $100 investment based on:			Net Income		Company Selected Measure
Year	Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO (1)		Compensation Actually Paid to PEO (1) (2) (3)						Total Shareholder Return (5)		Peer Group Total Shareholder Return	Net Income		Company Selected Measure
2022	$	4,469,618	$	(5,465,107)	$	1,917,297	$	(915,666)	$	88.86	*	$	3,274,395	*
2021	$	4,243,700	$	8,976,473	$	3,219,762	$	4,730,285	$	149.50	*	$	42,312,302	*


			Page
Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting and Voting			1
Security Ownership of Directors, Officers and Certain Beneficial Owners			5
Item 1—Election of Directors			6
Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance			8
Director Independence			8
Meetings of the Independent Directors			8
Committees of the Board			9
Meeting Attendance			10
Procedures for Contacting the Board of Directors			10
Procedures for Selecting and Nominating Director Candidates			10
Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight			10
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics			11
Director Compensation Table			12
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions			13
Related Person Transaction Policy			13
Related Transactions Involving Our Directors and Executive Officers			13
Item 2—Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation			13
Executive Compensation			15
Compensation Discussion and Analysis			15
Executive Compensation Tables			24
Potential Payments Upon Termination or a Change of Control			29
Employment Agreements			29
Item 3 —Advisory Vote on S ay-on-Pay Vote Frequency			30
Item 4 —Ratification of Appointment of Auditors			30
Audit Committee Report and Payment of Fees to Auditors			30
Audit Committee Report			30
Auditor Fees			31
Auditor Services Pre-Approval Policy			31
Item 5 —Stockholder Proposal			32


Chairman/CEO Compensation as Considered by our Compensation Committee
Year	Salary	PRSUs In Lieu of Salary (1)	Deferred RSUs	Deferred PRSUs	Total Annual Pay
2022	$50,000	$550,000	$2,150,000	$1,500,000	$4,250,000
2021	$50,000	$550,000	$2,700,000	$1,500,000	$4,800,000
2020	$50,000	$550,000	$2,700,000	$1,500,000	$4,800,000


	2021		2022
Audit Fees	$	1,560,500	$	1,642,710
Audit-Related Fees	—		—
Tax Fees	—		—
All Other Fees	—		5,000

Cover	12 Months Ended
Cover	Dec. 31, 2022
Document Information [Line Items]
Document Type	DEF 14A
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Information [Line Items]
Entity Registrant Name	GREENHILL & CO., INC.
Entity Central Index Key	0001282977