XML 79 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangibles Assets
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill has been allocated to reporting units that closely reflect the regions served by the Company’s four trade names: New York Sports Clubs (“NYSC”), Boston Sports Clubs (“BSC”), Washington Sports Clubs (“WSC”) and Philadelphia Sports Clubs (“PSC”), with certain more remote clubs that do not benefit from a regional cluster being considered single reporting units (“Outlier Clubs”), the Company’s three clubs located in Switzerland being considered a single reporting unit (“SSC”), and our BFX Studio ("BFX Studio"). As of December 31, 2014, the WSC region, PSC region, the Outlier Clubs and BFX Studio do not have goodwill balances.
The Company’s annual goodwill impairment tests are performed on the last day of February, or more frequently, should circumstances change which would indicate the fair value of goodwill is below its carrying amount. The determination as to whether a triggering event exists that would warrant an interim review of goodwill and whether a write-down of goodwill is necessary involves significant judgment based on short-term and long-term projections of the Company. Due to the significant decrease in market capitalization and a decline in the Company’s business outlook, the Company performed interim impairment tests as of December 31, 2014 and May 31, 2014.
The Company’s current year annual goodwill impairment test as of February 28, 2014 and the interim test performed as of May 31, 2014 and December 31, 2014 were performed using the two-step goodwill impairment analysis. Step 1 involves comparing the fair value of the Company’s reporting units to their carrying amounts. If the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, there is no requirement to perform step two of the impairment test, and there is no impairment. If the reporting unit’s carrying amount is greater than the fair value, the second step must be completed to measure the amount of impairment, if any. Step 2 calculates the implied fair value of goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible assets, excluding goodwill, of the reporting unit from the fair value of the reporting unit as determined in Step 1. The implied fair value of goodwill determined in this step is compared to the carrying value of goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference. The Company concluded that there would be no remaining implied value attributable to the Outlier Clubs. As a result of the annual test, the Company impaired $137 of goodwill associated with this reporting unit. The Company did not have a goodwill impairment charge in the NYSC, BSC and SSC regions as a result of either test.
For the December 31, 2014, May 31, 2014 and February 28, 2014 impairment tests, fair value was determined by using a weighted combination of two market-based approaches (weighted 50% collectively) and an income approach (weighted 50%), as this combination was deemed to be the most indicative of the Company’s fair value in an orderly transaction between market participants. Under the market-based approaches, the Company utilized information regarding the Company, the Company’s industry as well as publicly available industry information to determine earnings multiples and sales multiples that are used to value the Company’s reporting units. Under the income approach, the Company determined fair value based on estimated future cash flows of each reporting unit, discounted by an estimated weighted-average cost of capital, which reflects the overall level of inherent risk of a reporting unit and the rate of return an outside investor would expect to earn. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in nature and requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including revenue growth rates and operating margins, discount rates and future market conditions, among others. These assumptions were determined separately for each reporting unit. The Company believes its assumptions are reasonable, however, there can be no assurance that the Company’s estimates and assumptions made for purposes of the Company’s goodwill impairment testing as of December 31, 2014, May 31, 2014 and February 28, 2014 will prove to be accurate predictions of the future. If the Company’s assumptions regarding forecasted revenue or margin growth rates of certain reporting units are not achieved, the Company may be required to record goodwill impairment charges in future periods, whether in connection with the Company’s next annual impairment testing or prior to that, if any such change constitutes a triggering event outside the quarter when the annual goodwill impairment test is performed. It is not possible at this time to determine if any such future impairment charge would result. The estimated fair values of NYSC and SSC were greater than book values by 40% and 8%, respectively, as of December 31, 2014; 36% and 65%, respectively, as of May 31, 2014 and 48% and 73%, respectively, as of February 28, 2014. BSC was not tested separately in the interim tests as the goodwill balance was deemed immaterial. As of February 28, 2014, the estimated fair value of BSC was 24% greater than book value.
Solely for purposes of establishing inputs for the fair value calculation described above related to goodwill impairment testing, the Company made the following assumptions. The Company developed long-range financial forecasts (five years) for all reporting units and assumed organic growth from the existing club base. Terminal growth rates were calculated for years beyond the five year forecast. As of December 31, 2014, the Company used discount rates ranging from 12.5% to 17.8% and terminal growth rates ranging from 0.5% to 2.0%. As of May 31, 2014, the Company used discount rates ranging from 9.3% to 13.6% and terminal growth rates ranging from 0.5% to 2.0%. As of February 28, 2014, the Company used discount rates ranging from 9.5% to 16.5% and terminal growth rates ranging from 0.0% to 2.8%. These assumptions are developed separately for each reporting unit.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill from December 31, 2013 through December 31, 2014 are detailed in the charts below.
 
NYSC
 
BSC
 
SSC
 
Outlier Clubs
 
Total
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization
$
31,403

 
$
15,775

 
$
1,321

 
$
3,982

 
$
52,481

Less: accumulated impairment of goodwill

 
(15,766
)
 

 
(3,845
)
 
(19,611
)
Balance as of December 31, 2013
31,403

 
9

 
1,321

 
137

 
32,870

Changes due to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations

 

 
(140
)
 

 
(140
)
Less: impairment of goodwill

 

 

 
(137
)
 
(137
)
Balance as of December 31, 2014
$
31,403

 
$
9

 
$
1,181

 
$

 
$
32,593


Intangible assets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:
 
As of December 31, 2014
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Intangibles
Membership lists
$
11,344

 
$
(11,163
)
 
$
181

Management contracts
250

 
(73
)
 
177

Trade names
40

 
(4
)
 
36

 
$
11,634

 
$
(11,240
)
 
$
394

 
As of December 31, 2013
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Intangibles
Membership lists
$
11,344

 
$
(10,696
)
 
$
648

Non compete agreements
1,508

 
(1,508
)
 

Management contracts
250

 
(28
)
 
222

Trade names
40

 
(2
)
 
38

Other
23

 
(23
)
 

 
$
13,165

 
$
(12,257
)
 
$
908


Intangible assets were acquired in connection with the Company’s acquisitions during 2013. Amortization expense of intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $513 and $314, respectively. There was no amortization expense of intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2012.
The aggregate amortization expense for the next five years and thereafter of the acquired intangible assets is as follows:
 
Year Ending December 31,
 
2015
$
223

2016
36

2017
30

2018
24

2019
19

2020 and thereafter
62

 
$
394