XML 91 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
PENSION BENEFITS
12 Months Ended
Oct. 31, 2012
Pension Benefits  
PENSION BENEFITS

8.  PENSION BENEFITS:

   Effective July 15, 2010 the Companies sponsored defined benefit pension plan was amended such that future benefit accruals ceased effective as of August 31, 2010.  Benefits under the plan were based on average compensation and years of service.  The Companies funding policy is to contribute annually at least the minimum amounts required under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

       
Weighted Average Assumptions 10/31/12  10/31/11  10/31/10 
 Discount Rates used to determine net periodic pension cost as of October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 4.48% 5.26% 5.67%
 Expected long-term rates of return on assets 7.50% 7.50% 7.50%
 Rates of increase in compensation levels N/A N/A N/A

 

     
Change in Benefit Obligation 10/31/12  10/31/11 
 Benefit obligation at beginning of year $8,765,206  $7,583,064 
 Service cost (net of expenses) 49,106  55,788 
 Interest cost 384,941  391,258 
 Curtailment
 Actuarial loss 1,347,138  1,010,136 
 Benefits paid (344,797) (275,040)
 Benefit obligation at end of year $10,201,594  $8,765,206 

 

     
Change in Plan Assets 10/31/12  10/31/11 
 Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $5,452,890  $4,869,192 
 Actual return on plan assets 359,371  267,951 
 Employer contributions 564,358  637,600 
 Benefits paid (344,797) (275,040)
 Administrative expenses (71,192) (46,813)
 Fair value of plan assets at end of year $5,960,630  $5,452,890 

 

     
Reconciliation of Funded Status of the Plan 10/31/12  10/31/11 
 Funded status at end of year ($4,240,964) ($3,312,316)
 Unrecognized transition obligation
 Unrecognized net prior service cost
 Unrecognized net actuarial loss 4,960,745  3,824,812 
 Net amount recognized at end of year $719,781  $512,496 

 

     
Amounts Recognized in the Combined Balance Sheet 10/31/12  10/31/11 
 Accrued pension expense ($4,240,964) ($3,312,316)
 Accumulated other comprehensive loss (pre-tax) 4,960,745  3,824,812 
 Net amount recognized $719,781  $512,496 

 

     
Additional Year-End Information for Pension Plan with Accumulated Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets 10/31/12  10/31/11 
 Projected benefit obligation $10,201,594  $8,765,206 
 Accumulated benefit obligation $10,201,594  $8,765,206 
 Fair value of plan assets $5,960,630  $5,452,890 

 

     
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss 10/31/12  10/31/11 
 Net actuarial loss $4,960,745  $3,824,812 
 Prior service cost
 Unrecognized net initial obligation
 Total (before tax effects) $4,960,745  $3,824,812 

 

 

       
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost 10/31/12  10/31/11  10/31/10 
 Service cost $49,106  $55,788  $186,427 
 Interest cost 384,941  391,258  415,441 
 Expected return on plan assets (411,247) (369,382) (316,795)
 Amortization of transition obligation 2,868 
 Amortization of prior service cost 274 
 Amortization of accumulated loss 334,273  200,829  268,919 
 Total net periodic benefit expense $357,073  $278,493  $557,134 

 

     
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligationsrecognized in other comprehensive loss 10/31/12  10/31/11 
 Net loss $1,470,206  $1,111,567 
 Recognized net actuarial loss (334,273) (200,829)
 Prior service cost (credit)
 Recognized prior service (cost) credit
 Recognized net transition (obligation) asset
 Total recognized in other comprehensive loss  (before tax effects) $1,135,933  $910,738 
     
 Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and   other comprehensive income (before tax effects) $1,493,006  $1,189,231 

 

     
Amounts expected to be recognized into net periodic cost in the coming year 10/31/12 10/31/11 
 Loss recognition $511,101  $334,273 
 Prior service cost recognition $0  $0 
 Net initial obligation/(asset) recognition $0  $0 

 

 

     
Estimated Future Benefits Payments Fiscal Year Benefits
  2013 $366,113 
  2014 $376,461 
  2015 $396,040 
  2016 $479,580 
  2017 $530,877 
  2018-2022 $2,772,082 

   The Companies expect to contribute $278,913 to the pension plan in fiscal 2013.

   Measurement Date   October 31

     
Weighted Average Assumptions For Determination of:
  Benefit Obligations as of October 31, 2012 Benefit Obligations as of October 31, 2011
 Discount rate 3.50% 4.48%
 Rate of compensation increase N/A N/A

 

     
Weighted-Average Asset Allocations 10/31/12  10/31/11
 Asset Category    
 Equity 49.77% 62.86%
 Fixed Income 46.93% 35.92%
 Cash Equivalents 3.30% 1.22%
  Total 100.00% 100.00%

   The Companies goal is to conservatively invest the plan assets in high-grade securities with a minimum risk of market fluctuation.  Based on the allocation of our assets between equity, fixed income and money market funds, we estimate our long term rate of return to be approximately 7.5%.

   Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs when measuring fair value.

   The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

   Level 1 Fair value is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible to the Plan for identical assets.  These generally provide the most reliable evidence and are used to measure fair value whenever available.

   Level 2 Fair value is based on significant inputs, other than level 1 inputs, that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset through corroboration with observable market data.  Level 2 inputs include quoted market prices in active markets for similar assets, quoted market prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets, and other observable inputs.

   Level 3 Fair value would be based on significant unobservable inputs.  Examples of valuation methodologies that would result in level 3 classification include option pricing models, discounted cash flows, and other similar techniques.

   Information about the Plans fair value levels follows as at October 31, 2012:

         
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Money Market Fund $196,903      $196,903
Common Collective Trust Funds:        
     Aggressive Growth Portfolio   $871,332    $871,332 
     Long Duration Portfolio   748,353    748,353 
     Strategic Bond Portfolio   702,525    702,525 
     Intermediate Fixed Income Portfolio   677,165    677,165 
     Short Duration Portfolio   669,261    669,261 
     Large Company Value Portfolio   499,757    499,757 
     Fundamental Value Portfolio   481,368    481,368 
     International Core Portfolio   266,037    266,037 
     International Value Portfolio   257,014    257,014 
     Small Company Growth Portfolio   153,363    153,363 
     Small Company Value Portfolio   147,235    147,235 
     Mid-Cap Growth Portfolio   146,285    146,285 
     Mid-Cap Fundamental Value Portfolio   144,032    144,032 
     Guaranteed Investment Contract     $0 
Total $196,903  $5,763,727 $0  $5,960,630 

 

       
  GIC Portfolio   Assets at Fair Value
Balance, beginning of year $172,894    $172,894 
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net (172,894)   (172,894)
Balance, end of year $0    $0 

 

Information about the Plans fair value levels follows as at October 31, 2011:

         
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Money Market Fund $66,594      $66,594 
Common Collective Trust Funds:        
     Strategic Bond Portfolio   $614,794    614,794 
     Long Duration Portfolio   610,900    610,900 
     Intermediate Fixed Income Portfolio   559,924    559,924 
     Strategic Growth Portfolio   429,711    429,711 
     Large Company Domestic Growth Portfolio   428,527    428,527 
     Fundamental Value Portfolio   426,977    426,977 
     Large Company Value Portfolio   431,316    431,316 
     International Core Portfolio   344,025    344,025 
     International Value Portfolio   335,582    335,582 
     Small Company Growth Portfolio   259,632    259,632 
     Mid-Cap Growth Portfolio   252,851    252,851 
     Mid-Cap Fundamental Value Portfolio   260,101    260,101 
     Small Company Value Portfolio   259,062    259,062 
     Guaranteed Investment Contract     $172,894  172,894 
Total $66,594  $5,213,402  $172,894  $5,452,890 

 

       
  GIC Portfolio   Fair Value
Balance, beginning of year $173,652    $173,652 
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net (758)   (758)
Balance, end of year $172,894    $172,894 

   The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value.  There have been no changes in the methodologies used at October 31, 2012 and 2011.

   Money market fund is valued at cost, which approximates fair value.

   Common collective trust funds are valued based upon the unit values of such collective trust funds held by the Plan at year end.  Unit values are based on the fair value of the underlying assets of the fund.  The fair value of the level 2 funds are derived from inputs principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.  Included in the common collective trust funds is a level 3 GIC Portfolio which includes both traditional and separate account guaranteed investment contracts (GICs) as well as synthetic GICs.  The traditional and separate account GICs are valued by calculating the sum of the present values of all projected future cash flows of each investment.  The synthetic GIC wrapper contracts are valued by determining the replacement cost of the wrapper contract and the present value of the contractually obligated payments in the original wrapper contract.  Debt securities underlying synthetic GICs are traded primarily in the over-the-counter (OTC) markets and are valued at the latest available price in the OTC market or on the basis of values obtained by an independent pricing service.

   The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Plan believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.