XML 32 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
10. Pension Benefits
12 Months Ended
Oct. 31, 2011
Notes  
10. Pension Benefits:

10.  PENSION BENEFITS:

   Effective July 15, 2010 the Companies’ sponsored defined benefit pension plan was amended such that future benefit accruals ceased effective as of August 31, 2010.  Benefits under the plan were based on average compensation and years of service.  The Companies’ funding policy is to contribute annually at least the minimum amounts required under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

Weighted Average Assumptions

10/31/11 

10/31/10 

10/31/09 

 Discount Rates used to determine net periodic  pension cost as of October 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

5.26%

5.67%

8.25%

 Expected long-term rates of return on assets

7.50%

7.50%

7.50%

 Rates of increase in compensation levels

N/A

N/A

4.00%

 

Change in Benefit Obligation

10/31/11 

10/31/10 

 Benefit obligation at beginning of year

$7,583,064 

$7,392,287 

 Service cost (net of expenses)

55,788 

186,427 

 Interest cost

391,258 

415,441 

 Curtailment

(164,981)

 Actuarial loss

1,010,136 

19,173 

 Benefits paid

(275,040)

(265,283)

 Benefit obligation at end of year

$8,765,206 

$7,583,064 

 

Change in Plan Assets

10/31/11 

10/31/10 

 Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

$4,869,192 

$4,199,624 

 Actual return on plan assets

267,951 

598,148 

 Employer contributions

637,600 

402,126 

 Benefits paid

(275,040)

(265,283)

 Administrative expenses

(46,813)

(65,423)

 Fair value of plan assets at end of year

$5,452,890 

$4,869,192 

 

Reconciliation of Funded Status of the Plan

10/31/11 

10/31/10 

 Funded status at end of year

($3,312,316)

($2,713,872)

 Unrecognized transition obligation

 Unrecognized net prior service cost

 Unrecognized net actuarial loss

3,824,812 

2,867,261 

 Net amount recognized at end of year

$512,496 

$153,389 

 

Amounts Recognized in the Combined Balance Sheet

10/31/11 

10/31/10 

 Accrued pension expense

($3,312,316)

($2,713,872)

 Accumulated other comprehensive loss (pre-tax)

3,824,812 

2,867,261 

 Net amount recognized

$512,496 

$153,389 

 

Additional Year-End Information for Pension Plan with Accumulated Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets

10/31/11 

10/31/10 

 Projected benefit obligation

$8,765,206 

$7,583,064 

 Accumulated benefit obligation

$8,765,206 

$7,583,064 

 Fair value of plan assets

$5,452,890 

$4,869,192 

 

Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

10/31/11 

10/31/10 

 Net actuarial loss

$3,824,812 

$2,867,261 

 Prior service cost

 Unrecognized net initial obligation

 Total (before tax effects)

$3,824,812 

$2,867,261 

 

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

10/31/11 

10/31/10 

10/31/09 

 Service cost

$55,788 

$186,427 

$133,037 

 Interest cost

391,258 

415,441 

352,191 

 Expected return on plan assets

(369,382)

(316,795)

(265,883)

 Amortization of transition obligation

2,868 

2,868 

 Amortization of prior service cost

274 

274 

 Amortization of accumulated loss

200,829 

268,919 

60,656 

 Total net periodic benefit expense

$278,493 

$557,134 

$283,143 

 

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss

10/31/11 

10/31/10 

 Net loss (gain)

$1,111,567 

($262,180)

 Recognized net actuarial gain (loss)

(200,829)

(268,919)

 Prior service cost (credit)

 Recognized prior service (cost) credit

(274)

 Recognized net transition (obligation) asset

(2,868)

 Total recognized in other comprehensive loss   (before tax effects)

$910,738 

($534,241)

 

 

 

 Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and   other comprehensive income (before tax effects)

$1,189,231 

$22,893 

 

Amounts expected to be recognized into net periodic cost in the coming year

10/31/11 

10/31/10

 Loss recognition

$334,273 

$201,428 

 Prior service cost recognition

$0 

$0 

 Net initial obligation/(asset) recognition

$0 

$0 

 

 

Estimated Future Benefits Payments

Fiscal Year

Benefits

 

2012

$348,379 

 

2013

$347,424 

 

2014

$365,018 

 

2015

$385,135 

 

2016

$468,794 

 

2017-2021

$2,654,169 

   The Companies expect to contribute $545,687 to the pension plan in fiscal 2012.

   Measurement Date   October 31

Weighted Average Assumptions

For Determination of:

 

Benefit Obligations as of October 31, 2011

Benefit Obligations as of October 31, 2010

 Discount rate

4.48%

5.26%

 Rate of compensation increase

N/A

N/A

 

Weighted-Average Asset Allocations

10/31/11

10/31/10

 Asset Category

 

 

 Equity

62.86%

63.32%

 Fixed Income

35.92%

36.03%

 Cash Equivalents

1.22%

.65%

  Total

100.00%

100.00%

   The Companies’ goal is to conservatively invest the plan assets in high-grade securities with a minimum risk of market fluctuation.  Based on the allocation of our assets between equity, fixed income and money market funds, we estimate our long term rate of return to be approximately 7.5%.

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs when measuring fair value.

The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 – Fair value is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible to the Plan for identical assets.  These generally provide the most reliable evidence and are used to measure fair value whenever available.

Level 2 – Fair value is based on significant inputs, other than level 1 inputs, that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset through corroboration with observable market data.  Level 2 inputs include quoted market prices in active markets for similar assets, quoted market prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets, and other observable inputs.

Level 3 – Fair value would be based on significant unobservable inputs.  Examples of valuation methodologies that would result in level 3 classification include option pricing models, discounted cash flows, and other similar techniques.

Information about the Plan’s fair value levels follows as at October 31, 2011:

 

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Money Market Fund

$66,594 

 

 

$66,594 

Common Collective Trust Funds:

 

 

 

 

   Strategic Bond Portfolio

 

$614,794 

 

614,794 

   Long Duration Portfolio

 

610,900 

 

610,900 

   Intermediate Fixed Income Portfolio

 

559,924 

 

559,924 

   Strategic Growth Portfolio

 

429,711 

 

429,711 

   Large Company Domestic Growth Portfolio

 

428,527 

 

428,527 

   Fundamental Value Portfolio

 

426,977 

 

426,977 

   Large Company Value Portfolio

 

431,316 

 

431,316 

   International Core Portfolio

 

344,025 

 

344,025 

   International Value Portfolio

 

335,582 

 

335,582 

   Small Company Growth Portfolio

 

259,632 

 

259,632 

   Mid-Cap Growth Portfolio

 

252,851 

 

252,851 

   Mid-Cap Fundamental Value Portfolio

 

260,101 

 

260,101 

   Small Company Value Portfolio

 

259,062 

 

259,062 

   Guaranteed Investment Contract

 

 

$172,894 

172,894 

Total

$66,594 

$5,213,402 

$172,894 

$5,452,890 

 

 

GIC Portfolio

 

Assets at Fair Value

Balance, beginning of year

$173,652 

 

$173,652 

Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net

(758)

 

(758)

Balance, end of year

$172,894 

 

$172,894 

Information about the Plan’s fair value levels follows as at October 31, 2010:

 

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Money Market Fund

$31,448 

 

 

$31,448 

Common Collective Trust Funds:

 

 

 

 

   Strategic Bond Portfolio

 

$552,976 

 

552,976 

   Long Duration Portfolio

 

535,164 

 

535,164 

   Intermediate Fixed Income Portfolio

 

492,702 

 

492,702 

   Strategic Growth Portfolio

 

394,777 

 

394,777 

   Large Company Domestic Growth Portfolio

 

388,282 

 

388,282 

   Fundamental Value Portfolio

 

370,668 

 

370,668 

   Large Company Value Portfolio

 

376,815 

 

376,815 

   International Core Portfolio

 

316,470 

 

316,470 

   International Value Portfolio

 

314,915 

 

314,915 

   Small Company Growth Portfolio

 

240,743 

 

240,743 

   Mid-Cap Growth Portfolio

 

229,719 

 

229,719 

   Mid-Cap Fundamental Value Portfolio

 

228,283 

 

228,283 

   Small Company Value Portfolio

 

222,578 

 

222,578 

   Guaranteed Investment Contract

 

 

$173,652 

173,652 

Total

$31,448 

$4,664,092 

$173,652 

$4,869,192 

 

 

GIC Portfolio

 

Fair Value

Balance, beginning of year

$174,297 

 

$174,297 

Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net

(645)

 

(645)

Balance, end of year

$173,652 

 

$173,652 

   The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value.  There have been no changes in the methodologies used at October 31, 2011 and 2010.

   Money market fund is valued at cost, which approximates fair value.

   Common collective trust funds are valued based upon the unit values of such collective trust funds held by the Plan at year end.  Unit values are based on the fair value of the underlying assets of the fund.  The fair value of the level 2 funds are derived from inputs principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.  Included in the common collective trust funds is a level 3 GIC Portfolio which includes both traditional and separate account guaranteed investment contracts (GICs) as well as synthetic GICs.  The traditional and separate account GICs are valued by calculating the sum of the present values of all projected future cash flows of each investment.  The synthetic GIC wrapper contracts are valued by determining the replacement cost of the wrapper contract and the present value of the contractually obligated payments in the original wrapper contract.  Debt securities underlying synthetic GICs are traded primarily in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) markets and are valued at the latest available price in the OTC market or on the basis of values obtained by an independent pricing service.

   The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while the Plan believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.