N-CSRS 1 d815938dncsrs.htm ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE SHARES AllianceBernstein Corporate Shares

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM N-CSR

 

 

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED

MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number: 811-21497

 

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE SHARES

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

 

1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10105

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

 

 

Joseph J. Mantineo

AllianceBernstein L.P.

1345 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10105

(Name and address of agent for service)

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 221-5672

Date of fiscal year end: April 30, 2015

Date of reporting period: October 31, 2014

 

 

 


ITEM 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.


SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

 

AllianceBernstein

Corporate Income Shares

 

October 31, 2014

 

Semi-Annual Report

 

LOGO


 

Investment Products Offered

 

• Are Not FDIC Insured

• May Lose Value

• Are Not Bank Guaranteed

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. For copies of our prospectus or summary prospectus, which contain this and other information, visit us online at www.alliancebernstein.com or contact your AllianceBernstein Investments representative. Please read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

This shareholder report must be preceded or accompanied by the Fund’s prospectus for individuals who are not current shareholders of the Fund.

You may obtain a description of the Fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, and information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, without charge. Simply visit AllianceBernstein’s website at www.alliancebernstein.com, or go to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “Commission”) website at www.sec.gov, or call AllianceBernstein at (800) 227-4618.

The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. The Fund’s Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC; information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.

AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (ABI) is the distributor of the AllianceBernstein family of mutual funds. ABI is a member of FINRA and is an affiliate of AllianceBernstein L.P., the manager of the funds.

AllianceBernstein® and the AB Logo are registered trademarks and service marks used by permission of the owner, AllianceBernstein L.P.


December 9, 2014

 

Semi-Annual Report

This report provides management’s discussion of fund performance for AllianceBernstein Corporate Income Shares (the “Fund”) for the semi-annual reporting period ended October 31, 2014. Please note, shares of this Fund are offered exclusively through registered investment advisers approved by AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”).

Investment Objective and Policies

The Fund’s investment objective is to earn high current income. The Fund invests, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets in U.S. corporate bonds. The Fund may also invest in U.S. Government securities (other than U.S. Government securities that are mortgage-backed or asset-backed securities), repurchase agreements and forward contracts relating to U.S. Government securities. The Fund normally invests all of its assets in securities that are rated, at the time of purchase, at least BBB- or the equivalent. The Fund will not invest in unrated corporate debt securities. The Fund has the flexibility to invest in long- and short-term fixed-income securities. In making decisions about whether to buy or sell securities, the Adviser will consider, among other things, the strength of certain sectors of the fixed-income market relative to others, interest rates and other general market conditions and the credit quality of individual issuers.

The Fund also may invest in convertible debt securities; invest up to 10% of its assets in inflation-indexed securities; invest up to 5% of its net assets in preferred stock; purchase and

sell interest rate futures contracts and options; enter into swap transactions; invest in zero-coupon securities and “payment-in-kind” debentures; make secured loans of portfolio securities; and invest in U.S. dollar-denominated fixed-income securities issued by non-U.S. companies.

Investment Results

The table on page 6 shows the Fund’s performance compared to its benchmark, the Barclays U.S. Credit Bond Index, for the six- and 12-month periods ended October 31, 2014.

The Fund outperformed its benchmark for both periods. Corporate security selection, particularly within the Fund’s bank holdings (where the Fund was overweight subordinated debt) was the primary contributor to returns during both periods. Security selection within the basics and insurance sectors also contributed for both periods. Energy and telecommunications security selection added to performance for the 12-month period; conversely, an underweight to the non-corporate part of the benchmark detracted for the six-month period, while exposure to U.S. Treasuries was a modest detractor for the 12-month period. An underweight in longer-maturity holdings detracted during the 12-month period, as the yield curve flattened.

The Fund utilized derivatives in the form of interest rate swaps to manage overall duration and yield curve positioning during both periods. Credit default swaps were utilized for investment purposes during both periods, which had an immaterial impact on performance.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       1   


Market Review and Investment Strategy

Markets remained heavily focused on the direction of interest rates, central bank monetary policy and global growth during the six-month period. Earlier in the year, volatility increased as the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) began to taper its asset purchase program and investors worried about the impact of higher interest rates. However, fixed-income markets stabilized in the first quarter of 2014 and bond fund flows turned positive once again, as U.S. economic data cooled, blamed mostly on winter weather. Ongoing geopolitical concerns, specifically the conflict between Ukraine and Russia, as well as continued violence in the Middle East, contributed to periodic safe haven rallies into U.S. Treasuries, keeping a lid on yields.

Contrary to expectations, interest rates continued to decline toward the end of the reporting period as investors became increasingly wary regarding global growth, particularly in Europe and China. Worries about Europe increased as core inflation moved closer to zero and the European Central Bank (“ECB”) cut key interest rates, announcing plans to repurchase asset-backed securities and covered bonds to further stimulate the struggling economy. Low yields in the euro area and further easing by the ECB helped anchor U.S. Treasury yields.

The U.S. Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) also announced no changes to the stance of U.S. monetary policy after its mid-September meeting, allaying concerns for higher interest

rates. The FOMC reaffirmed its views that U.S. interest rates will remain low until unemployment and inflation are more closely aligned with Fed targets. However, the Fed did end its monthly bond purchase program at the end of October, and dropped a characterization of U.S. labor market slack as “significant” in a show of confidence in the economy’s prospects. The Fed largely dismissed financial market volatility, dimming growth in Europe and a weak inflation outlook as unlikely to undercut progress toward its unemployment and inflation goals. Despite the intra-period volatility, the ten-year U.S. Treasury yield declined only 0.22% during the 12-month period to end at a yield of 2.34%. The U.S. Treasury curve flattened, as intermediate yields rose and longer-term yields declined.

Against this backdrop, fixed-income sectors benefited from the low-yield environment with major U.S. fixed-income sectors posting positive returns. Credit-sensitive securities generally outperformed Treasuries with corporate sectors, both investment-grade and high-yield, posting the strongest returns. Corporate fundamentals, as well as earnings, remained favorable amid ample global liquidity and tighter spreads.

Corporate valuations, in the view of the Corporate Income Shares Investment Team (the “Team”), are generally fair, and fundamentals remain solid. But at this stage in the credit cycle, with mergers and acquisitions on the rise, careful security selection and diversification remain important

 

2     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES


safeguards against idiosyncratic risk. Unlike industrials, financial firms continue to deleverage and, in the Team’s view, remain an attractive opportunity. The Fund remains overweight financials (banks, insurance and real estate investment trusts). The Team still sees

better value in subordinated issues over senior debt. The Fund’s industry allocation remains overweight in the energy, communications and basic industries sectors, with an underweight to consumer non-cyclicals, electric, technology and capital goods.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       3   


DISCLOSURES AND RISKS

Benchmark Disclosure

The unmanaged Barclays U.S. Credit Bond Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a fund. The Barclays U.S. Credit Bond Index represents the performance of the U.S. credit securities within the U.S. fixed-income market. An investor cannot invest directly in an index, and its results are not indicative of the performance for any specific investment, including the Fund.

A Word About Risk

Market Risk: The value of the Fund’s assets will fluctuate as the stock or bond market fluctuates. The value of the Fund’s investments may decline, sometimes rapidly and unpredictably, simply because of economic changes or other events that affect large portions of the market.

Credit Risk: An issuer or guarantor of a fixed-income security, or the counterparty to a derivatives or other contract, may be unable or unwilling to make timely payments of interest or principal, or to otherwise honor its obligations. The issuer or guarantor may default, causing a loss of the full principal amount of a security. The degree of risk for a particular security may be reflected in its credit rating. There is the possibility that the credit rating of a fixed-income security may be downgraded after purchase, which may adversely affect the value of the security. Investments in fixed-income securities with lower ratings tend to have a higher probability that an issuer will default or fail to meet its payment obligations.

Interest Rate Risk: Changes in interest rates will affect the value of investments in fixed-income securities. When interest rates rise, the value of investments in fixed-income securities tends to fall and this decrease in value may not be offset by higher income from new investments. Interest rate risk is generally greater for fixed-income securities with longer maturities or durations.

Inflation Risk: This is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the value of the Fund’s assets can decline as can the value of the Fund’s distributions. This risk is significantly greater for fixed-income securities with longer maturities.

Foreign (Non-U.S.) Risk: Investments in securities of non-U.S. issuers may involve more risk than those of U.S. issuers. These securities may fluctuate more widely in price and may be less liquid due to adverse market, economic, political, regulatory or other factors.

Derivatives Risk: Investments in derivatives may be illiquid, difficult to price, and leveraged so that small changes may produce disproportionate losses for the Fund, and may be subject to counterparty risk to a greater degree than more traditional investments.

Management Risk: The Fund is subject to management risk because it is an actively-managed investment fund. The Adviser will apply its investment techniques and risk analyses in making investment decisions, but there is no guarantee that its techniques will produce the intended results.

These risks are fully discussed in the Fund’s prospectus.

An Important Note About Historical Performance

The performance shown on the following pages represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance information shown. You may obtain performance information current to the most recent month-end by calling (800) 227-4618. The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will

 

(Disclosures, Risks and Note about Historical Performance continued on next page)

 

4     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Disclosures and Risks


DISCLOSURES AND RISKS

(continued from previous page)

 

fluctuate, so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. For copies of our prospectus and/or summary prospectus, which contain this and other information, visit us online at www.alliancebernstein.com or contact your AllianceBernstein Investments representative. Please read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       5   

Disclosures and Risks


HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE

 

   

THE FUND VS. ITS BENCHMARK

PERIODS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2014 (unaudited)

  NAV Returns      
  6 Months        12 Months       
AllianceBernstein Corporate Income Shares*     3.01%           7.62%     

 

Barclays U.S. Credit Bond Index     2.55%           6.24%     

 

*    Includes the impact of proceeds received and credited to the Fund resulting from class action settlements, which enhanced the performance of the Fund for the six- and 12-month periods ended October 31, 2014 by 0.01% and 0.01%, respectively.

        

 

AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURNS AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2014 (unaudited)  
     NAV Returns  
  

1 Year

     7.62

5 Years

     7.30

Since Inception*

     6.77

 

SEC AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURNS
AS OF THE MOST RECENT CALENDAR QUARTER-END
SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 (unaudited)
 
     SEC Returns  
  

1 Year

     8.35

5 Years

     7.34

Since Inception*

     6.71

The prospectus fee table shows the fees and the total fund operating expenses of the Fund as 0.00% because the Adviser does not charge any fees or expenses and reimburses Fund operating expenses. Participants in a wrap fee program or other investment program eligible to invest in the Fund pay fees to the program sponsor and should review the program brochure or other literature provided by the sponsor for a discussion of fees and expenses charged.

 

 

*   Inception date: 12/11/2006.

See Disclosures, Risks and Note about Historical Performance on pages 4-5.

 

6     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Historical Performance


EXPENSE EXAMPLE

(unaudited)

 

As a shareholder of the Fund, you may incur various ongoing non-operating and extraordinary costs. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.

The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period as indicated below.

Actual Expenses

The table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes

The table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed annual rate of return of 5% before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds by comparing this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), or contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions. Therefore, the hypothetical example is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

 

     Beginning
Account Value
May 1, 2014
     Ending
Account Value
October 31, 2014
     Expenses Paid
During Period*
    Annualized
Expense Ratio*
 

Actual

   $     1,000       $     1,030.10       $     – 0  –      0.00

Hypothetical**

   $ 1,000       $ 1,025.21       $ – 0  –      0.00
*   Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Fund’s operating expenses are borne by the Adviser or its affiliates.

 

**   Assumes 5% annual return before expenses.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       7   

Expense Example


PORTFOLIO SUMMARY

October 31, 2014 (unaudited)

 

PORTFOLIO STATISTICS

Net Assets ($mil): $43.5

 

LOGO

 

 

 

*   All data are as of October 31, 2014. The Fund’s security type breakdown is expressed as a percentage of total investments and may vary over time. The Fund also enters into derivative transactions, which may be used for hedging or investment purposes (see “Portfolio of Investments” section of the report for additional details)

 

8     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Portfolio Summary


PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

October 31, 2014 (unaudited)

 

     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

CORPORATES – INVESTMENT GRADE – 90.9%

  

 

Industrial – 47.3%

    

Basic – 5.1%

    

Alpek SAB de CV
4.50%, 11/20/22(a)

   $ 200      $ 203,500   

Celulosa Arauco y Constitucion SA
4.50%, 8/01/24(a)

     200        198,896   

CF Industries, Inc.
7.125%, 5/01/20

     50        60,118   

Dow Chemical Co. (The)
8.55%, 5/15/19

     185        233,006   

Freeport-McMoran Oil & Gas LLC/FCX
Oil & Gas, Inc.
6.50%, 11/15/20

     284        310,128   

Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
2.375%, 3/15/18

     69        69,369   

Georgia-Pacific LLC
7.25%, 6/01/28

     240        317,197   

Glencore Funding LLC
3.125%, 4/29/19(a)

     70        70,665   

International Paper Co.
4.75%, 2/15/22

     175        189,771   

7.50%, 8/15/21

     80        100,086   

LyondellBasell Industries NV
5.00%, 4/15/19

     200        220,475   

Mosaic Co. (The)
4.25%, 11/15/23

     120        125,872   

Teck Resources Ltd.
4.50%, 1/15/21

     100        104,614   

Vale SA
5.625%, 9/11/42

     15        14,823   
    

 

 

 
       2,218,520   
    

 

 

 

Capital Goods – 1.9%

    

BAE Systems Holdings, Inc.
3.80%, 10/07/24(a)

     76        76,499   

Boeing Co. (The)
5.875%, 2/15/40

     140        178,601   

Embraer SA
5.15%, 6/15/22

     200        212,750   

Owens Corning
9.00%, 6/15/19

     210        255,790   

Yamana Gold, Inc.
4.95%, 7/15/24(a)

     102        99,765   
    

 

 

 
       823,405   
    

 

 

 

Communications - Media – 5.0%

    

21st Century Fox America, Inc.
7.43%, 10/01/26

     55        70,020   

8.875%, 4/26/23

     125        167,581   

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       9   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

CBS Corp.
4.90%, 8/15/44

   $ 80      $ 79,865   

5.75%, 4/15/20

     169        193,366   

Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc.
9.455%, 11/15/22

     110        157,695   

COX Communications, Inc.
5.875%, 12/01/16(a)

     135        147,309   

DirecTV Holdings LLC/DirecTV Financing Co., Inc.
3.80%, 3/15/22

     90        91,678   

4.45%, 4/01/24

     100        104,333   

5.20%, 3/15/20

     53        59,266   

Discovery Communications LLC
4.875%, 4/01/43

     84        84,442   

Moody’s Corp.
2.75%, 7/15/19

     79        80,224   

Omnicom Group, Inc.
6.25%, 7/15/19

     165        193,048   

TCI Communications, Inc.
7.875%, 2/15/26

     150        207,474   

Time Warner Cable, Inc.
4.50%, 9/15/42

     65        64,078   

5.50%, 9/01/41

     25        28,234   

5.875%, 11/15/40

     30        35,309   

6.55%, 5/01/37

     39        49,074   

Time Warner, Inc.
4.70%, 1/15/21

     60        65,689   

6.25%, 3/29/41

     85        102,312   

Viacom, Inc.
4.25%, 9/01/23

     120        123,741   

5.25%, 4/01/44

     50        52,525   
    

 

 

 
       2,157,263   
    

 

 

 

Communications - Telecommunications – 6.8%

  

 

American Tower Corp.
3.40%, 2/15/19

     40        40,914   

4.50%, 1/15/18

     40        42,696   

7.25%, 5/15/19

     150        179,396   

Ameritech Capital Funding Corp.
6.55%, 1/15/28

     130        154,856   

AT&T, Inc.
3.00%, 2/15/22

     420        415,247   

3.875%, 8/15/21

     230        241,161   

BellSouth Corp.
6.55%, 6/15/34

     145        179,463   

British Telecommunications PLC
9.625%, 12/15/30

     175        275,477   

Deutsche Telekom International Finance BV
4.875%, 3/06/42(a)

     190        196,552   

Telefonica Emisiones SAU
5.462%, 2/16/21

     145        162,732   

 

10     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Verizon Communications, Inc.
2.55%, 6/17/19

   $ 46      $ 46,493   

3.50%, 11/01/21

     275        280,303   

3.85%, 11/01/42

     90        79,300   

4.50%, 9/15/20

     50        54,286   

5.15%, 9/15/23

     217        243,016   

6.55%, 9/15/43

     104        131,103   

Verizon New York, Inc.
Series B
7.375%, 4/01/32

     170        214,021   
    

 

 

 
       2,937,016   
    

 

 

 

Consumer Cyclical - Automotive – 2.1%

    

Ford Motor Co.
6.50%, 8/01/18

     225        260,457   

Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC
5.875%, 8/02/21

     575        664,563   
    

 

 

 
       925,020   
    

 

 

 

Consumer Cyclical - Entertainment – 0.4%

    

Carnival Corp.
1.875%, 12/15/17

     180        179,466   
    

 

 

 

Consumer Cyclical - Other – 0.8%

    

Host Hotels & Resorts LP
Series D
3.75%, 10/15/23

     91        90,112   

Marriott International, Inc./DE
3.00%, 3/01/19

     151        155,036   

Wyndham Worldwide Corp.
2.50%, 3/01/18

     115        115,672   
    

 

 

 
       360,820   
    

 

 

 

Consumer Cyclical - Restaurants – 0.1%

    

Yum! Brands, Inc.
3.875%, 11/01/20

     60        62,583   
    

 

 

 

Consumer Cyclical - Retailers – 1.8%

    

Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
4.50%, 12/01/23

     115        121,341   

Gap, Inc. (The)
5.95%, 4/12/21

     100        112,932   

Home Depot, Inc. (The)
5.40%, 9/15/40

     130        153,303   

5.875%, 12/16/36

     30        37,894   

Kohl’s Corp.
6.25%, 12/15/17

     85        95,901   

Macy’s Retail Holdings, Inc.
3.875%, 1/15/22

     250        260,750   
    

 

 

 
       782,121   
    

 

 

 

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       11   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Consumer Non-Cyclical – 5.9%

    

AbbVie, Inc.
2.90%, 11/06/22

   $ 100      $ 97,276   

Actavis, Inc.
1.875%, 10/01/17

     130        128,858   

Altria Group, Inc.
4.75%, 5/05/21

     370        407,524   

Amgen, Inc.
5.15%, 11/15/41

     120        128,699   

Bayer US Finance LLC
2.375%, 10/08/19(a)

     200        200,335   

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
5.875%, 11/15/36

     52        64,561   

Forest Laboratories, Inc.
4.375%, 2/01/19(a)

     105        109,983   

Grupo Bimbo SAB de CV
4.50%, 1/25/22(a)

     200        211,121   

Kroger Co. (The)
3.85%, 8/01/23

     80        82,218   

McKesson Corp.
7.50%, 2/15/19

     105        126,791   

Mylan, Inc./PA
2.60%, 6/24/18

     140        142,001   

Perrigo Co. PLC
4.00%, 11/15/23

     200        204,468   

Procter & Gamble Co. (The)
5.80%, 8/15/34

     55        70,910   

Reynolds American, Inc.
3.25%, 11/01/22

     61        59,571   

4.85%, 9/15/23

     40        43,133   

Tyson Foods, Inc.
2.65%, 8/15/19

     24        24,229   

3.95%, 8/15/24

     75        76,493   

4.50%, 6/15/22

     110        117,712   

Whirlpool Corp.
3.70%, 3/01/23

     120        121,499   

Wyeth LLC
6.00%, 2/15/36

     100        126,621   
    

 

 

 
       2,544,003   
    

 

 

 

Energy – 11.9%

    

Anadarko Petroleum Corp.
6.375%, 9/15/17

     265        299,182   

Apache Corp.
4.25%, 1/15/44

     215        199,369   

ConocoPhillips Holding Co.
6.95%, 4/15/29

     166        224,267   

Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.
4.875%, 11/01/43

     40        35,969   

 

12     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Enbridge Energy Partners LP
4.20%, 9/15/21

   $ 100      $ 106,685   

Energy Transfer Partners LP
4.15%, 10/01/20

     75        78,175   

4.65%, 6/01/21

     150        160,092   

5.20%, 2/01/22

     170        186,015   

Enterprise Products Operating LLC
3.75%, 2/15/25

     135        135,794   

5.25%, 1/31/20

     350        394,229   

Hess Corp.
5.60%, 2/15/41

     40        45,328   

7.875%, 10/01/29

     144        194,841   

Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP
3.95%, 9/01/22

     175        174,527   

4.25%, 9/01/24

     90        89,604   

7.40%, 3/15/31

     145        173,575   

Nabors Industries, Inc.
2.35%, 9/15/16

     170        172,577   

5.10%, 9/15/23

     182        194,752   

Nisource Finance Corp.
6.80%, 1/15/19

     100        118,204   

Noble Energy, Inc.
4.15%, 12/15/21

     65        69,324   

Noble Holding International Ltd.
4.90%, 8/01/20

     90        92,999   

ONEOK Partners LP
3.375%, 10/01/22

     240        234,209   

Phillips 66
4.30%, 4/01/22

     54        57,888   

Spectra Energy Capital LLC
8.00%, 10/01/19

     23        28,507   

Spectra Energy Partners LP
2.95%, 9/25/18

     77        79,557   

4.60%, 6/15/21

     75        82,052   

Sunoco Logistics Partners Operations LP
4.25%, 4/01/24

     54        55,409   

5.30%, 4/01/44

     60        62,075   

Talisman Energy, Inc.
3.75%, 2/01/21

     64        63,962   

Transocean, Inc.
6.375%, 12/15/21

     195        204,917   

6.50%, 11/15/20

     85        87,430   

Valero Energy Corp.
6.125%, 2/01/20

     70        81,529   

6.625%, 6/15/37

     67        82,368   

7.50%, 4/15/32

     46        59,277   

Weatherford International Ltd./Bermuda
4.50%, 4/15/22

     205        210,777   

5.125%, 9/15/20

     85        92,688   

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       13   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

9.625%, 3/01/19

   $ 45      $ 57,505   

Williams Partners LP
3.90%, 1/15/25

     69        68,452   

4.125%, 11/15/20

     128        134,597   

5.25%, 3/15/20

     150        166,526   

Williams Partners LP/Williams Partners
Finance Corp.
7.25%, 2/01/17

     115        128,679   
    

 

 

 
       5,183,912   
    

 

 

 

Other Industrial – 0.5%

    

Fresnillo PLC
5.50%, 11/13/23(a)

     200        210,821   
    

 

 

 

Technology – 2.5%

    

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
3.875%, 6/05/24

     115        116,577   

Hewlett-Packard Co.
2.75%, 1/14/19

     14        14,081   

3.75%, 12/01/20

     87        89,240   

4.30%, 6/01/21

     80        83,871   

4.65%, 12/09/21

     29        31,135   

Kla-tencor Corp.
4.65%, 11/01/24

     167        168,284   

Motorola Solutions, Inc.
3.75%, 5/15/22

     220        219,000   

Seagate HDD Cayman
4.75%, 1/01/25(a)

     35        35,394   

4.75%, 6/01/23

     140        144,484   

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
4.125%, 5/15/22

     4        4,183   

Total System Services, Inc.
2.375%, 6/01/18

     105        104,594   

Xerox Corp.
2.80%, 5/15/20

     95        93,878   
    

 

 

 
       1,104,721   
    

 

 

 

Transportation - Airlines – 0.3%

    

Southwest Airlines Co.
5.75%, 12/15/16

     130        141,799   
    

 

 

 

Transportation - Railroads – 1.3%

    

Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC
4.55%, 9/01/44

     85        86,232   

CSX Corp.
4.40%, 3/01/43

     180        180,265   

Norfolk Southern Corp.
3.25%, 12/01/21

     230        235,599   

Union Pacific Corp.
4.00%, 2/01/21

     40        43,614   
    

 

 

 
       545,710   
    

 

 

 

 

14     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Transportation - Services – 0.9%

    

FedEx Corp.
8.00%, 1/15/19

   $ 40      $ 49,085   

Penske Truck Leasing Co. LP/PTL Finance Corp. 3.75%, 5/11/17(a)

     120        126,055   

Ryder System, Inc.
2.50%, 3/01/18

     185        188,885   

5.85%, 11/01/16

     28        30,533   
    

 

 

 
       394,558   
    

 

 

 
       20,571,738   
    

 

 

 

Financial Institutions – 40.8%

    

Banking – 23.4%

    

ABN AMRO Bank NV
Series E
6.25%, 9/13/22(a)

     255        278,906   

Bank of America Corp.
3.30%, 1/11/23

     140        138,806   

4.00%, 4/01/24

     130        134,325   

4.10%, 7/24/23

     425        443,679   

4.20%, 8/26/24

     60        60,430   

4.875%, 4/01/44

     120        128,511   

5.00%, 5/13/21

     235        260,159   

Bank One Michigan
8.25%, 11/01/24

     440        587,579   

Barclays Bank PLC
3.75%, 5/15/24

     275        278,523   

5.14%, 10/14/20

     339        368,422   

BB&T Corp.
5.25%, 11/01/19

     275        310,145   

BPCE SA
5.15%, 7/21/24(a)

     200        205,839   

Capital One Bank USA NA
3.375%, 2/15/23

     550        544,689   

Citigroup, Inc.
3.50%, 5/15/23

     350        342,662   

3.875%, 10/25/23

     98        100,885   

6.625%, 1/15/28

     210        265,828   

Countrywide Financial Corp.
6.25%, 5/15/16

     253        271,781   

Fifth Third Bancorp
3.50%, 3/15/22

     31        31,802   

5.45%, 1/15/17

     105        113,937   

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)
2.375%, 1/22/18

     130        131,213   

3.85%, 7/08/24

     460        464,716   

Series D

    

6.00%, 6/15/20

     320        368,003   

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       15   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Series G

    

7.50%, 2/15/19

   $ 75      $ 89,553   

JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.875%, 9/10/24

     110        109,284   

4.95%, 3/25/20

     220        244,273   

Morgan Stanley
5.625%, 9/23/19

     604        684,195   

Series F

    

3.875%, 4/29/24

     130        131,702   

Series G

    

5.50%, 7/24/20

     395        446,225   

6.625%, 4/01/18

     100        114,516   

People’s United Bank
4.00%, 7/15/24

     250        250,185   

People’s United Financial, Inc.
3.65%, 12/06/22

     83        83,820   

PNC Bank NA
4.875%, 9/21/17

     400        436,890   

Rabobank Capital Funding Trust III
5.254%, 10/21/16(a)(b)

     100        105,000   

Regions Financial Corp.
2.00%, 5/15/18

     300        297,584   

Santander Holdings USA, Inc./PA
3.45%, 8/27/18

     130        135,622   

State Street Corp.
4.956%, 3/15/18

     240        261,729   

SunTrust Bank/Atlanta GA
7.25%, 3/15/18

     145        167,682   

Turkiye Garanti Bankasi AS
4.75%, 10/17/19(a)

     200        202,684   

UBS AG/Stamford CT
7.50%, 7/15/25

     100        127,989   

Wells Fargo & Co.
4.65%, 11/04/44

     110        109,639   

Wells Fargo Bank NA
6.18%, 2/15/36

     250        312,637   

Zions Bancorporation
4.50%, 6/13/23

     13        13,667   
    

 

 

 
       10,155,716   
    

 

 

 

Finance – 1.9%

    

GE Capital Trust I
6.375%, 11/15/67

     345        369,042   

General Electric Capital Corp.
5.875%, 1/14/38

     140        171,788   

HSBC Finance Capital Trust IX
5.911%, 11/30/35

     270        276,075   
    

 

 

 
       816,905   
    

 

 

 

 

16     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Insurance – 8.2%

    

American International Group, Inc.
6.40%, 12/15/20

   $ 285      $ 340,333   

8.175%, 5/15/58

     65        88,237   

Aquarius & Investments PLC for Swiss Reinsurance Co., Ltd.
6.375%, 9/01/24(a)

     200        208,500   

Assurant, Inc.
2.50%, 3/15/18

     105        105,814   

Chubb Corp. (The)
5.75%, 5/15/18

     190        216,109   

Cigna Corp.
4.00%, 2/15/22

     175        183,973   

7.875%, 5/15/27

     65        85,981   

Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America (The)
7.375%, 9/30/39(a)

     42        57,534   

Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (The)
5.375%, 3/15/17

     190        207,373   

5.50%, 3/30/20

     100        113,379   

6.10%, 10/01/41

     45        56,080   

Lincoln National Corp.
4.85%, 6/24/21

     100        110,358   

8.75%, 7/01/19

     82        104,145   

Markel Corp.
7.125%, 9/30/19

     59        70,586   

MetLife Capital Trust IV
7.875%, 12/15/37(a)

     150        191,625   

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
9.375%, 8/15/39(a)

     90        138,705   

Principal Financial Group, Inc.
1.85%, 11/15/17

     170        170,732   

Progressive Corp. (The)
6.70%, 6/15/37

     62        68,045   

Prudential Financial, Inc.
4.50%, 11/15/20

     39        42,409   

5.625%, 6/15/43

     200        207,500   

Series B

    

5.75%, 7/15/33

     135        159,378   

Reliance Standard Life Global Funding II
2.50%, 4/24/19(a)

     140        140,864   

Swiss Re Solutions Holding Corp.
7.00%, 2/15/26

     90        114,027   

UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
3.375%, 11/15/21

     170        177,068   

WellPoint, Inc.
7.00%, 2/15/19

     105        125,139   

XLIT Ltd.
6.25%, 5/15/27

     75        89,615   
    

 

 

 
       3,573,509   
    

 

 

 

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       17   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

REITS – 7.3%

    

Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
3.90%, 6/15/23

   $ 100      $ 100,462   

Boston Properties LP
3.125%, 9/01/23

     200        194,196   

DDR Corp.
9.625%, 3/15/16

     105        116,957   

Duke Realty LP
6.75%, 3/15/20

     55        64,966   

EPR Properties
5.25%, 7/15/23

     175        185,522   

Essex Portfolio LP
3.25%, 5/01/23

     56        54,658   

3.375%, 1/15/23

     125        123,365   

HCP, Inc.
4.20%, 3/01/24

     150        153,295   

6.70%, 1/30/18

     160        184,268   

Health Care REIT, Inc.
2.25%, 3/15/18

     107        108,287   

5.25%, 1/15/22

     140        155,175   

Healthcare Trust of America Holdings LP
3.70%, 4/15/23

     140        138,099   

Hospitality Properties Trust
5.00%, 8/15/22

     210        221,372   

Kimco Realty Corp.
6.875%, 10/01/19

     70        83,392   

Mid-America Apartments LP
3.75%, 6/15/24

     115        114,813   

Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
4.50%, 1/15/25(a)

     108        105,972   

Realty Income Corp.
5.75%, 1/15/21

     210        239,878   

Trust F/1401
5.25%, 12/15/24(a)

     230        242,650   

Ventas Realty LP/Ventas Capital Corp.
2.00%, 2/15/18

     216        216,951   

Vornado Realty LP
5.00%, 1/15/22

     215        235,632   

Washington Real Estate Investment Trust
4.95%, 10/01/20

     140        152,362   
    

 

 

 
       3,192,272   
    

 

 

 
       17,738,402   
    

 

 

 

Utility – 2.5%

    

Electric – 2.2%

    

Berkshire Hathaway Energy Co.
6.125%, 4/01/36

     150        188,280   

CMS Energy Corp.
6.25%, 2/01/20

     165        194,391   

 

18     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
4.45%, 6/15/20

   $ 100      $ 111,051   

Series 07-A

    

6.30%, 8/15/37

     30        39,123   

Empresa Nacional de Electricidad SA/Chile
4.25%, 4/15/24

     33        33,452   

Exelon Generation Co. LLC
4.25%, 6/15/22

     150        156,538   

Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
4.50%, 12/15/41

     50        51,505   

PacifiCorp
6.00%, 1/15/39

     70        90,469   

Potomac Electric Power Co.
6.50%, 11/15/37

     65        87,980   
    

 

 

 
       952,789   
    

 

 

 

Natural Gas – 0.3%

    

AGL Capital Corp.
5.25%, 8/15/19

     105        117,880   
    

 

 

 
       1,070,669   
    

 

 

 

Non Corporate Sectors – 0.3%

    

Agencies - Not Government Guaranteed – 0.3%

  

 

Petrobras International Finance Co SA
5.375%, 1/27/21

     130        133,102   
    

 

 

 
    

Total Corporates – Investment Grade
(cost $38,241,990)

       39,513,911   
    

 

 

 
    

GOVERNMENTS – TREASURIES – 3.9%

    

United States – 3.9%

    

U.S. Treasury Bonds
3.125%, 2/15/42

     660        670,828   

3.625%, 8/15/43-2/15/44

     700        776,735   

4.625%, 2/15/40

     195        252,891   
    

 

 

 

Total Governments – Treasuries
(cost $1,500,114)

       1,700,454   
    

 

 

 
    

QUASI-SOVEREIGNS – 1.7%

    
Quasi-Sovereign Bonds – 1.7%     

Mexico – 1.7%

    

Comision Federal de Electricidad
5.75%, 2/14/42(a)

     200        211,500   

Petroleos Mexicanos
3.50%, 7/18/18-1/30/23

     429        424,221   

6.625%, 6/15/35

     70        82,600   
    

 

 

 

Total Quasi-Sovereigns
(cost $694,597)

       718,321   
    

 

 

 

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       19   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

CORPORATES – NON-INVESTMENT
GRADE – 0.8%

    

Financial Institutions – 0.3%

    

Banking – 0.2%

    

Unicredit Luxembourg Finance SA
6.00%, 10/31/17(a)

   $ 100      $ 107,814   
    

 

 

 

Finance – 0.1%

    

Navient Corp.
4.875%, 6/17/19

     46        46,690   
    

 

 

 
       154,504   
    

 

 

 

Utility – 0.3%

    

Electric – 0.3%

    

FirstEnergy Transmission LLC
4.35%, 1/15/25(a)

     115        117,654   
    

 

 

 

Industrial – 0.2%

    

Basic – 0.2%

    

Commercial Metals Co.
7.35%, 8/15/18

     80        88,800   
    

 

 

 

Total Corporates – Non-Investment Grade
(cost $339,732)

       360,958   
    

 

 

 
     Shares        

PREFERRED STOCKS – 0.8%

    

Financial Institutions – 0.8%

    

Banking – 0.4%

    

US Bancorp/MN
6.00%

     6,550        177,243   
    

 

 

 

Insurance – 0.4%

    

Allstate Corp. (The)
5.10%

     6,950        170,831   
    

 

 

 

Total Preferred Stocks
(cost $360,042)

       348,074   
    

 

 

 
     Principal
Amount
(000)
       

GOVERNMENTS – SOVEREIGN
BONDS – 0.2%

    

Poland – 0.2%

    

Poland Government International Bond
4.00%, 1/22/24
(cost $99,246)

   $ 100        105,081   
    

 

 

 

GOVERNMENTS – SOVEREIGN AGENCIES – 0.2%

  

 

Colombia – 0.2%

    

Ecopetrol SA
5.875%, 9/18/23
(cost $76,319)

     77        85,855   
    

 

 

 

 

20     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS – 1.2%

    

Time Deposit – 1.2%

    

State Street Time Deposit
0.01%, 11/03/14
(cost $520,344)

   $ 520      $ 520,344   
    

 

 

 

Total Investments – 99.7%
(cost $41,832,384)

       43,352,998   

Other assets less liabilities – 0.3%

       140,766   
    

 

 

 

Net Assets – 100.0%

     $ 43,493,764   
    

 

 

 

CENTRALLY CLEARED INTEREST RATE SWAPS (see Note C)

 

                Rate Type      
Clearing Broker/
(Exchange)
  Notional
Amount
(000)
    Termination
Date
    Payments
made by the
Fund
  Payments
received by
the Fund
  Unrealized
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
 

Citigroup Global Markets, Inc./(CME Group)

  $     510        5/02/24      2.790%   3 Month LIBOR   $ (23,047

Citigroup Global Markets, Inc./(CME Group)

    255        5/02/24      3 Month LIBOR   2.790%     3,389   

Citigroup Global Markets, Inc./(CME Group)

    320        5/02/34      3 Month LIBOR   3.363%     27,056   

Citigroup Global Markets, Inc./(CME Group)

    60        11/04/44      3 Month LIBOR   3.049%     – 0  – 

Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC/(CME Group)

    770        11/29/23      2.793%   3 Month LIBOR     (35,076

Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC/(CME Group)

    510        1/28/24      2.861%   3 Month LIBOR     (23,747
         

 

 

 
          $     (51,425
         

 

 

 

CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS (see Note C)

 

Swap

Counterparty &

Referenced

Obligation

  Fixed
Rate
(Pay)
Receive
    Implied
Credit
Spread at
October 31,
2014
    Notional
Amount
(000)
    Market
Value
    Upfront
Premiums
Paid
(Received)
    Unrealized
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
 

Sale Contracts

           

Credit Suisse International:

           

Kohl’s Corp.,
6.25%, 12/15/17, 6/20/19*

    1.00     0.97   $     121      $     128      $     (1,515   $     1,643   

 

*   Termination date

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       21   

Portfolio of Investments


INTEREST RATE SWAPS (see Note C)

 

                Rate Type      
Swap
Counterparty
  Notional
Amount
(000)
    Termination
Date
    Payments
made by the
Fund
 

Payments
received

by the

Fund

  Unrealized
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
 

Deutsche Bank AG

  $ 600        6/10/43      3 Month LIBOR   3.191%   $ 25,766   

JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA

    175        6/10/23      2.293%   3 Month LIBOR     (897

JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA

        350        6/10/33      3 Month LIBOR   3.027%     10,654   
         

 

 

 
          $     35,523   
         

 

 

 

 

(a)   Security is exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities are considered liquid and may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At October 31, 2014, the aggregate market value of these securities amounted to $4,202,142 or 9.7% of net assets.

 

(b)   Securities are perpetual and, thus, do not have a predetermined maturity date. The date shown, if applicable, reflects the next call date.

Glossary:

CME Chicago Mercantile Exchange

LIBOR London Interbank Offered Rates

REIT Real Estate Investment Trust

See notes to financial statements.

 

22     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


STATEMENT OF ASSETS & LIABILITIES

October 31, 2014 (unaudited)

 

Assets   

Investments in securities, at value (cost $41,832,384)

   $ 43,352,998   

Due from broker

     58,180 (a) 

Interest receivable

     529,814   

Receivable for shares of beneficial interest sold

     63,659   

Unrealized appreciation on interest rate swaps

     36,420   

Unrealized appreciation on credit default swaps

     1,643   
  

 

 

 

Total assets

     44,042,714   
  

 

 

 
Liabilities   

Due to custodian

     10,395   

Payable for investment securities purchased

     363,558   

Dividends payable

     148,573   

Payable for shares of beneficial interest redeemed

     22,644   

Upfront premium received on credit default swaps

     1,515   

Payable for variation margin on exchange-traded derivatives

     1,368   

Unrealized depreciation on interest rate swaps

     897   
  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     548,950   
  

 

 

 

Net Assets

   $ 43,493,764   
  

 

 

 
Composition of Net Assets   

Shares of beneficial interest, at par

   $ 39   

Additional paid-in capital

         42,754,954   

Undistributed net investment income

     94,067   

Accumulated net realized loss on investment transactions

     (861,651

Net unrealized appreciation on investments

     1,506,355   
  

 

 

 
   $ 43,493,764   
  

 

 

 

Net Asset Value Per Share—unlimited shares of beneficial interest authorized, $.00001 par value (based on 3,865,401 common shares outstanding)

   $ 11.25   
  

 

 

 

 

 

(a)   Represents amounts on deposit at the broker as collateral for open derivative contracts.

See notes to financial statements.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       23   

Statement of Assets & Liabilities


STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Six Months Ended October 31, 2014 (unaudited)

 

Investment Income    

Interest

  $     870,189     

Dividends

    10,262     

Consent fee income

    1,088     
 

 

 

   

Total investment income

    $ 881,539   
   

 

 

 
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investment Transactions    

Net realized gain (loss) on:

   

Investment transactions

      351,367   

Swaps

      (19,812

Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of:

   

Investments

      138,146   

Swaps

      28,698   
   

 

 

 

Net gain on investment transactions

      498,399   
   

 

 

 

Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations

    $     1,379,938   
   

 

 

 

 

 

See notes to financial statements.

 

24     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Statement of Operations


STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

 

 

     Six Months Ended
October 31, 2014
(unaudited)
    Year Ended
April 30,
2014
 
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from Operations     

Net investment income

   $ 881,539      $ 1,757,491   

Net realized gain on investment transactions

     331,555        2,158   

Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments

     166,844        (983,305
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase in net assets from operations

     1,379,938        776,344   
Dividends to Shareholders from     

Net investment income

     (869,355     (1,755,639
Transactions in Shares of Beneficial Interest     

Net increase (decrease)

     (3,006,137     4,169,590   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total increase (decrease)

     (2,495,554     3,190,295   
Net Assets     

Beginning of period

     45,989,318        42,799,023   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of period (including undistributed net investment income of $94,067 and $81,883, respectively)

   $     43,493,764      $     45,989,318   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

See notes to financial statements.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       25   

Statement of Changes in Net Assets


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

October 31, 2014 (unaudited)

 

NOTE A

Significant Accounting Policies

AllianceBernstein Corporate Shares (the “Trust”) was organized as a Massachusetts business trust under the laws of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts by an Agreement and Declaration of Trust dated January 26, 2004. The Trust is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as an open-end, diversified management investment company. The Trust operates as a “series” company currently offering three separate portfolios: AllianceBernstein Corporate Income Shares (the “Portfolio”), AllianceBernstein Municipal Income Shares and AllianceBernstein Taxable Multi-Sector Income Shares. Each Portfolio is considered to be a separate entity for financial reporting and tax purposes. This report relates only to AllianceBernstein Corporate Income Shares.

Shares of the Portfolio are offered exclusively to holders of accounts established under wrap-fee programs sponsored and maintained by certain registered investment advisers approved by AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”). The Portfolio’s shares may be purchased at the relevant net asset value without a sales charge or other fee. The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) which require management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Portfolio.

1. Security Valuation

Portfolio securities are valued at their current market value determined on the basis of market quotations or, if market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable, at “fair value” as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”).

In general, the market values of securities which are readily available and deemed reliable are determined as follows: securities listed on a national securities exchange (other than securities listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. (“NASDAQ”)) or on a foreign securities exchange are valued at the last sale price at the close of the exchange or foreign securities exchange. If there has been no sale on such day, the securities are valued at the last traded price from the previous day. Securities listed on more than one exchange are valued by reference to the principal exchange on which the securities are traded; securities listed only on NASDAQ are valued in accordance with the NASDAQ Official Closing Price; listed or over the counter (“OTC”) market put or call options are valued at the mid level between the current bid and ask prices. If either a current bid or current ask price is unavailable, the Adviser will have discretion to determine the best valuation (e.g. last trade price in the case of listed options);

 

26     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

open futures are valued using the closing settlement price or, in the absence of such a price, the most recent quoted bid price. If there are no quotations available for the day of valuation, the last available closing settlement price is used; U.S. government securities and other debt instruments having 60 days or less remaining until maturity are valued at amortized cost if their original maturity was 60 days or less. If the original term to maturity exceeded 60 days, the securities are valued by a pricing service, if a market price is available. If a market price is not available, the securities are valued by using amortized cost as of the 61st day prior to maturity. Fixed-income securities, including mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, may be valued on the basis of prices provided by a pricing service or at a price obtained from one or more of the major broker-dealers. In cases where broker-dealer quotes are obtained, the Adviser may establish procedures whereby changes in market yields or spreads are used to adjust, on a daily basis, a recently obtained quoted price on a security. Swaps and other derivatives are valued daily, primarily using independent pricing services, independent pricing models using market inputs, as well as third party broker-dealers or counterparties. Investment companies are valued at their net asset value each day.

Securities for which market quotations are not readily available (including restricted securities) or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value. Factors considered in making this determination may include, but are not limited to, information obtained by contacting the issuer, analysts, analysis of the issuer’s financial statements or other available documents. In addition, the Portfolio may use fair value pricing for securities primarily traded in non-U.S. markets because most foreign markets close well before the Portfolio values its securities at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time. The earlier close of these foreign markets gives rise to the possibility that significant events, including broad market moves, may have occurred in the interim and may materially affect the value of those securities.

2. Fair Value Measurements

In accordance with U.S. GAAP regarding fair value measurements, fair value is defined as the price that the Portfolio would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. U.S. GAAP establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability (including those valued based on their market values as described in Note A.1 above). Inputs may be observable or unobservable and refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Portfolio. Unobservable inputs reflect the Portfolio’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances. Each investment is assigned a

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       27   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

level based upon the observability of the inputs which are significant to the overall valuation. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized below.

 

   

Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical investments

   

Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)

   

Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolio’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

The fair value of debt instruments, such as bonds, and over-the-counter derivatives is generally based on market price quotations, recently executed market transactions (where observable) or industry recognized modeling techniques and are generally classified as Level 2. Pricing vendor inputs to Level 2 valuations may include quoted prices for similar investments in active markets, interest rate curves, coupon rates, currency rates, yield curves, option adjusted spreads, default rates, credit spreads and other unique security features in order to estimate the relevant cash flows which are then discounted to calculate fair values. If these inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value, these investments will be classified as Level 3. In addition, non-agency rated investments are classified as Level 3.

Other fixed income investments, including non-U.S. government and corporate debt, are generally valued using quoted market prices, if available, which are typically impacted by current interest rates, maturity dates and any perceived credit risk of the issuer. Additionally, in the absence of quoted market prices, these inputs are used by pricing vendors to derive a valuation based upon industry or proprietary models which incorporate issuer specific data with relevant yield/spread comparisons with more widely quoted bonds with similar key characteristics. Those investments for which there are observable inputs are classified as Level 2. Where the inputs are not observable, the investments are classified as Level 3.

The following table summarizes the valuation of the Portfolio’s investments by the above fair value hierarchy levels as of October 31, 2014:

 

Investments in

Securities:

   Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  

Assets:

        

Corporates – Investment Grade

   $ – 0  –    $     39,513,911      $     – 0  –    $ 39,513,911   

Governments – Treasuries

     – 0  –      1,700,454        – 0  –      1,700,454   

Quasi-Sovereigns

     – 0  –      718,321        – 0  –      718,321   

Corporates – Non-Investment Grade

     – 0  –      360,958        – 0  –      360,958   

Preferred Stocks

         348,074        – 0  –      – 0  –      348,074   

Governments – Sovereign Bonds

     – 0  –      105,081        – 0  –      105,081   

Governments – Sovereign Agencies

     – 0  –      85,855        – 0  –      85,855   

Short-Term Investments

     – 0  –      520,344        – 0  –      520,344   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Investments in Securities

     348,074        43,004,924        – 0  –          43,352,998   

 

28     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

Investments in

Securities:

   Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  

Other Financial Instruments*:

        

Assets:

        

Centrally Cleared Interest Rate Swaps

   $ – 0  –    $ 30,445      $ – 0  –    $ 30,445

Credit Default Swaps

     – 0  –      1,643        – 0  –      1,643   

Interest Rate Swaps

     – 0  –      36,420        – 0  –      36,420   

Liabilities:

        

Centrally Cleared Interest Rate Swaps

     – 0  –      (81,870     – 0  –      (81,870 )# 

Interest Rate Swaps

     – 0  –      (897     – 0  –      (897
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total^

   $     348,074      $     42,990,665      $     – 0  –    $     43,338,739   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*   Other financial instruments are derivative instruments, such as futures, forwards and swaps, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation/depreciation on the instrument.

 

#   Only variation margin receivable/payable at period end is reported within the statement of assets and liabilities. This amount reflects cumulative appreciation/(depreciation) of exchange-traded derivatives as reported in the portfolio of investments.

 

^   There were no transfers between any levels during the reporting period.

The Portfolio recognizes all transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy assuming the financial instruments were transferred at the beginning of the reporting period.

The Adviser has established a Valuation Committee (the “Committee”) which is responsible for overseeing the pricing and valuation of all securities held in the Portfolio. The Committee operates under pricing and valuation policies and procedures established by the Adviser and approved by the Board, including pricing policies which set forth the mechanisms and processes to be employed on a daily basis to implement these policies and procedures. In particular, the pricing policies describe how to determine market quotations for securities and other instruments. The Committee’s responsibilities include: 1) fair value and liquidity determinations (and oversight of any third parties to whom any responsibility for fair value and liquidity determinations is delegated), and 2) regular monitoring of the Adviser’s pricing and valuation policies and procedures and modification or enhancement of these policies and procedures (or recommendation of the modification of these policies and procedures) as the Committee believes appropriate.

The Committee is also responsible for monitoring the implementation of the pricing policies by the Adviser’s Pricing Group (the “Pricing Group”) and a third party which performs certain pricing functions in accordance with the pricing policies. The Pricing Group is responsible for the oversight of the third party on a day-to-day basis. The Committee and the Pricing Group perform a series of activities to provide reasonable assurance of the accuracy of prices including: 1) periodic vendor due diligence meetings, review of methodologies, new developments and processes at vendors, 2) daily comparison of security valuation

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       29   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

versus prior day for all securities that exceeded established thresholds, and 3) daily review of unpriced, stale, and variance reports with exceptions reviewed by senior management and the Committee.

In addition, several processes outside of the pricing process are used to monitor valuation issues including: 1) performance and performance attribution reports are monitored for anomalous impacts based upon benchmark performance, and 2) portfolio managers review all portfolios for performance and analytics (which are generated using the Adviser’s prices).

3. Taxes

It is the Portfolio’s policy to meet the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute all of its investment company taxable income and net realized gains, if any, to shareholders. Therefore, no provisions for federal income or excise taxes are required.

In accordance with U.S. GAAP requirements regarding accounting for uncertainties in income taxes, management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken or expected to be taken on federal and state income tax returns for all open tax years (the current and the prior three tax years) and has concluded that no provision for income tax is required in the Portfolio’s financial statements.

4. Investment Income and Investment Transactions

Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date or as soon as the Portfolio is informed of the dividend. Interest income is accrued daily. Investment transactions are accounted for on the date the securities are purchased or sold. Investment gains or losses are determined on the identified cost basis. The Portfolio amortizes premiums and accretes discounts as adjustments to interest income.

5. Dividends and Distributions

Dividends and distributions to shareholders, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income dividends and capital gains distributions are determined in accordance with federal tax regulations and may differ from those determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. To the extent these differences are permanent, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts based on their federal tax basis treatment; temporary differences do not require such reclassification.

NOTE B

Advisory Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates

Under the terms of the Advisory Agreement, the Portfolio pays no advisory fee to the Adviser and the Adviser reimburses or pays for the Portfolio’s operating expenses. The Portfolio is an integral part of separately managed accounts in wrap-fee programs. Typically, participants in these programs pay a fee to their investment adviser for all costs and expenses of the separately managed account, including costs and expenses associated with the Portfolio, and a fee paid by their investment adviser to the Adviser. The Adviser serves as investment manager and adviser of the Portfolio and continuously furnishes an investment program for the

 

30     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

Portfolio and manages, supervises and conducts the affairs of the Portfolio, subject to the supervisions of the Portfolio’s Board. The Advisory Agreement provides that the Adviser or an affiliate will furnish, or pay the expenses of the Portfolio for, office space, facilities and equipment, services of executive and other personnel of the Portfolio and certain administrative services.

The Portfolio has entered into a Distribution Agreement with AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc., the Portfolio’s principal underwriter (the “Underwriter”), to permit the Underwriter to distribute the Portfolio’s shares, which are sold at their net asset value without any sales charge. The Portfolio does not pay a fee for this service. The Underwriter is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Adviser.

AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc. (“ABIS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Adviser, acts as the Portfolio’s registrar, transfer agent and dividend-disbursing agent. ABIS registers the transfer, issuance and redemption of Portfolio shares and disburses dividends and other distributions to Portfolio shareholders. The Portfolio does not pay a fee for this service.

NOTE C

Investment Transactions

Purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term investments) for the six months ended October 31, 2014 were as follows:

 

     Purchases      Sales  

Investment securities (excluding
U.S. government securities)

   $     7,390,223       $     9,742,242   

U.S. government securities

     535,147         709,043   

The cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, gross unrealized appreciation and unrealized depreciation are as follows:

 

Gross unrealized appreciation

   $     1,647,629   

Gross unrealized depreciation

     (127,015
  

 

 

 

Net unrealized appreciation

   $ 1,520,614   
  

 

 

 

1. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Portfolio may use derivatives in an effort to earn income and enhance returns, to replace more traditional direct investments, to obtain exposure to otherwise inaccessible markets (collectively, “investment purposes”), or to hedge or adjust the risk profile of its portfolio.

The principal type of derivatives utilized by the Portfolio, as well as the methods in which they may be used are:

 

   

Swaps

The Portfolio may enter into swaps to hedge its exposure to interest rates, credit risk, or currencies. The Portfolio may also enter into swaps for non-

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       31   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

hedging purposes as a means of gaining market exposures, including by making direct investments in foreign currencies. A swap is an agreement that obligates two parties to exchange a series of cash flows at specified intervals based upon or calculated by reference to changes in specified prices or rates for a specified amount of an underlying asset. The payment flows are usually netted against each other, with the difference being paid by one party to the other. In addition, collateral may be pledged or received by the Portfolio in accordance with the terms of the respective swaps to provide value and recourse to the Portfolio or its counterparties in the event of default, bankruptcy or insolvency by one of the parties to the swap.

Risks may arise as a result of the failure of the counterparty to the swap to comply with the terms of the swap. The loss incurred by the failure of a counterparty is generally limited to the net interim payment to be received by the Portfolio, and/or the termination value at the end of the contract. Therefore, the Portfolio considers the creditworthiness of each counterparty to a swap in evaluating potential counterparty risk. This risk is mitigated by having a netting arrangement between the Portfolio and the counterparty and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the Portfolio to cover the Portfolio exposure to the counterparty. Additionally, risks may arise from unanticipated movements in interest rates or in the value of the underlying securities. The Portfolio accrues for the interim payments on swaps on a daily basis, with the net amount recorded within unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swaps on the statement of assets and liabilities, where applicable. Once the interim payments are settled in cash, the net amount is recorded as realized gain/(loss) on swaps on the statement of operations, in addition to any realized gain/(loss) recorded upon the termination of swaps. Fluctuations in the value of swaps are recorded as a component of net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swaps on the statement of operations.

Certain standardized swaps, including certain interest rate swaps and credit default swaps, are (or soon will be) subject to mandatory central clearing. Cleared swaps are transacted through futures commission merchants (“FCMs”) that are members of central clearinghouses, with the clearinghouse serving as central counterparty, similar to transactions in futures contracts. Centralized clearing will be required for additional categories of swaps on a phased-in basis based on requirements published by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

At the time the Portfolio enters into a centrally cleared swap, the Portfolio deposits and maintains as collateral an initial margin with the broker, as required by the exchange on which the transaction is effected. Such amount is shown as due from broker on the statement of assets and liabilities. Pursuant to the contract, the Portfolio agrees to receive from or pay to the broker an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in the

 

32     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

value of the contract. Such receipts or payments are known as variation margin and are recorded by the Portfolio as unrealized gains or losses. Risks may arise from the potential inability of a counterparty to meet the terms of the contract. The credit/counterparty risk for swaps cleared through a central clearinghouse exchange is generally less than privately negotiated swaps, since the clearinghouse, which is the issuer or counterparty to each exchange-traded swap, has robust risk mitigation standards, including the requirement to provide initial and variation margin. When the contract is closed, the Portfolio records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the time it was closed.

Interest Rate Swaps:

The Portfolio is subject to interest rate risk exposure in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. Because the Portfolio holds fixed rate bonds, the value of these bonds may decrease if interest rates rise. To help hedge against this risk and to maintain its ability to generate income at prevailing market rates, the Portfolio may enter into interest rate swaps. Interest rate swaps are agreements between two parties to exchange cash flows based on a notional amount. The Portfolio may elect to pay a fixed rate and receive a floating rate, or, receive a fixed rate and pay a floating rate on a notional amount.

In addition, a Portfolio may also enter into interest rate swap transactions to preserve a return or spread on a particular investment or portion of its portfolio, or protecting against an increase in the price of securities the Portfolio anticipates purchasing at a later date. Interest rate swaps involve the exchange by the Portfolio with another party of their respective commitments to pay or receive interest (e.g., an exchange of floating rate payments for fixed rate payments) computed based on a contractually-based principal (or “notional”) amount. Interest rate swaps are entered into on a net basis (i.e., the two payment streams are netted out, with the Portfolio receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two payments).

During the six months ended October 31, 2014, the Portfolio held interest rate swaps contracts for hedging purposes.

Credit Default Swaps:

The Portfolio may enter into credit default swaps, including to manage its exposure to the market or certain sectors of the market, to reduce its risk exposure to defaults by corporate and sovereign issuers held by the Portfolio, or to create exposure to corporate or sovereign issuers to which it is not otherwise exposed. The Portfolio may purchase credit protection (“Buy Contract”) or provide credit protection (“Sale Contract”) on the referenced obligation of the credit default swap. During the term of the swap, the Portfolio receives/(pays) fixed payments from/(to) the respective

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       33   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

counterparty, calculated at the agreed upon rate applied to the notional amount. If the Portfolio is a buyer/(seller) of protection and a credit event occurs, as defined under the terms of the swap, the Portfolio will either (i) receive from the seller/(pay to the buyer) of protection an amount equal to the notional amount of the swap (the “Maximum Payout Amount”) and deliver/(take delivery of) the referenced obligation or (ii) receive/(pay) a net settlement amount in the form of cash or securities equal to the notional amount of the swap less the recovery value of the referenced obligation.

In certain circumstances Maximum Payout Amounts may be partially offset by recovery values of the respective referenced obligations, upfront premium received upon entering into the agreement, or net amounts received from settlement of buy protection credit default swaps entered into by the Portfolio for the same reference obligation with the same counterparty. As of October 31, 2014, the Portfolio did not have Buy Contracts outstanding with respect to the same referenced obligation and same counterparty for its Sales Contracts outstanding.

Credit default swaps may involve greater risks than if a Portfolio had invested in the referenced obligation directly. Credit default swaps are subject to general market risk, liquidity risk, counterparty risk and credit risk. If the Portfolio is a buyer of protection and no credit event occurs, it will lose the payments it made to its counterparty. If the Portfolio is a seller of protection and a credit event occurs, the value of the referenced obligation received by the Portfolio coupled with the periodic payments previously received, may be less than the Maximum Payout Amount it pays to the buyer, resulting in a net loss to the Portfolio.

During the six months ended October 31, 2014, the Portfolio held credit default swaps for non-hedging purposes.

Implied credit spreads over U.S. Treasuries of comparable maturity utilized in determining the market value of credit default swaps on issuers as of period end are disclosed in the portfolio of investments. The implied spreads serve as an indicator of the current status of the payment/performance risk and typically reflect the likelihood of default by the issuer of the referenced obligation. The implied credit spread of a particular reference obligation also reflects the cost of buying/selling protection and may reflect upfront payments required to be made to enter into the agreement. Widening credit spreads typically represent a deterioration of the referenced obligation’s credit soundness and greater likelihood of default or other credit event occurring as defined under the terms of the agreement. A credit spread identified as “Defaulted” indicates a credit event has occurred for the referenced obligation.

The Portfolio typically enters into International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Master Agreements (“ISDA Master Agreement”) or similar master agreements (collectively, “Master Agreements”) with its OTC derivative contract

 

34     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

counterparties in order to, among other things, reduce its credit risk to counterparties. ISDA Master Agreements include provisions for general obligations, representations, collateral and events of default or termination. Under an ISDA Master Agreement, the Portfolio typically may offset with the counterparty certain derivative financial instrument’s payables and/or receivables with collateral held and/or posted and create one single net payment (close-out netting) in the event of default or termination.

Various Master Agreements govern the terms of certain transactions with counterparties, including transactions such as exchange-traded derivative transactions, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements. These Master Agreements typically attempt to reduce the counterparty risk associated with such transactions by specifying credit protection mechanisms and providing standardization that improves legal certainty. Cross-termination provisions under Master Agreements typically provide that a default in connection with one transaction between the Portfolio and a counterparty gives the non-defaulting party the right to terminate any other transactions in place with the defaulting party to create one single net payment due to/due from the defaulting party. In the event of a default by a Master Agreements counterparty, the return of collateral with market value in excess of the Portfolio’s net liability, held by the defaulting party, may be delayed or denied.

The Portfolio Master Agreements may contain provisions for early termination of OTC derivative transactions in the event the net assets of the Portfolio decline below specific levels (“net asset contingent features”). If these levels are triggered, the Portfolio counterparty has the right to terminate such transaction and require the Portfolio to pay or receive a settlement amount in connection with the terminated transaction. For additional details, please refer to netting arrangements by counterparty tables below.

At October 31, 2014, the Portfolio had entered into the following derivatives:

 

    

Asset Derivatives

   

Liability Derivatives

 

Derivative Type

 

Statement of
Assets and
Liabilities
Location

  Fair Value    

Statement of
Assets and
Liabilities
Location

  Fair Value  

Interest rate contracts

  Receivable/Payable for variation margin on exchange-traded derivatives   $ 30,445   Receivable/Payable for variation margin on exchange-traded derivatives   $ 81,870

Interest rate contracts

  Unrealized appreciation on interest rate swaps     36,420      Unrealized depreciation on interest rate swaps     897   

Credit contracts

  Unrealized appreciation on credit default swaps     1,643       
   

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total

    $     68,508        $     82,767   
   

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       35   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

 

*   Only variation margin receivable/payable at period end is reported within the statement of assets and liabilities. This amount reflects cumulative appreciation/(depreciation) of exchange-traded derivatives as reported in the portfolio of investments.

The effect of derivative instruments on the statement of operations for the six months ended October 31, 2014:

 

Derivative Type

 

Location of Gain

or (Loss) on

Derivatives

  Realized Gain
or (Loss) on
Derivatives
    Change in
Unrealized
Appreciation or
(Depreciation)
 

Interest rate contracts

  Net realized gain (loss) on swaps; Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swaps   $ (20,242   $ 27,055   

Credit contracts

  Net realized gain (loss) on swaps; Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swaps     430        1,643   
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

    $     (19,812   $     28,698   
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table represents the volume of the Portfolio’s derivative transactions during the six months ended October 31, 2014:

 

Interest Rate Swaps:

  

Average notional amount

   $ 1,725,000   

Centrally Cleared Interest Rate Swaps:

  

Average notional amount

   $     2,262,143   

Credit Default Swaps:

  

Average notional amount of sale contracts

   $ 120,934   

For financial reporting purposes, the Portfolio does not offset derivative assets and derivative liabilities that are subject to netting arrangements in the statement of assets and liabilities.

All derivatives held at period end were subject to netting arrangements. The following table presents the Portfolio’s derivative assets and liabilities by counterparty net of amounts available for offset under Master Agreements (“MA”) and net of the related collateral received/pledged by the Portfolio as of October 31, 2014:

 

Counterparty

  Derivative
Assets
Subject to a MA
    Derivative
Available for
Offset
    Cash
Collateral
Received
    Security
Collateral
Received
    Net Amount  of
Derivatives
Assets
 

Exchange-Traded Derivatives:

         

Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC*

  $     3,448      $     – 0  –    $     – 0  –    $     – 0  –    $     3,448   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $ 3,448      $ – 0  –    $ – 0  –    $ – 0  –    $ 3,448   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
         

 

36     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

Counterparty

  Derivative
Assets
Subject to a MA
    Derivative
Available for
Offset
    Cash
Collateral
Received
    Security
Collateral
Received
    Net Amount  of
Derivatives
Assets
 

OTC Derivatives:

         

Credit Suisse International:

  $ 128      $ – 0  –    $ – 0  –    $ – 0  –    $ 128   

Deutsche Bank AG

    25,766        – 0  –      – 0  –      – 0  –      25,766   

JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA

    10,654        (897     – 0  –      – 0  –      9,757   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $     36,548      $     (897   $     – 0  –    $     – 0  –    $     35,651 ^ 
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Counterparty

  Derivative
Liabilities
Subject to a MA
    Derivative
Available for
Offset
    Cash
Collateral
Pledged
    Security
Collateral
Pledged
    Net Amount  of
Derivatives
Liabilities
 

Exchange-Traded Derivatives:

         

Citigroup Global Markets, Inc*

  $ 4,816      $ – 0  –    $ (4,816   $ – 0  –    $ – 0  – 
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $     4,816      $ – 0  –    $     (4,816   $ – 0  –    $ – 0  – 
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
         

OTC Derivatives:

         

JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA

  $ 897      $ (897   $ – 0  –    $ – 0  –    $ – 0  – 
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $ 897      $     (897   $ – 0  –    $     – 0  –    $     – 0  – 
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*   Cash has been posted for initial margin requirements for exchange traded derivatives outstanding at October 31, 2014.

 

^   Net amount represents the net receivable/(payable) that would be due from/to the counterparty in the event of default or termination. The net amount from OTC financial derivative instruments can only be netted across transactions governed under the same master agreement with the same counterparty.

NOTE D

Shares of Beneficial Interest

Transactions in shares of beneficial interest were as follows:

 

            
     Shares         Amount      
     Six Months Ended
October 31, 2014
(unaudited)
   

Year Ended

April 30,

2014

       

Six Months Ended
October 31, 2014

(unaudited)

   

Year Ended

April 30,

2014

     
  

 

 

   
Class A             

Shares sold

     85,929        1,360,531        $         966,670      $     14,748,542     

 

   

Shares redeemed

     (353,763     (976,510       (3,972,807     (10,578,952  

 

   

Net increase (decrease)

     (267,834     384,021        $ (3,006,137   $ 4,169,590     

 

   

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       37   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

NOTE E

Risks Involved in Investing in the Portfolio

Interest Rate Risk and Credit Risk—Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in interest rates will affect the value of the Portfolio’s investments in fixed-income debt securities such as bonds or notes. Increases in interest rates may cause the value of the Portfolio’s investments to decline. Credit risk is the risk that the issuer or guarantor of a debt security, or the counterparty to a derivative contract, will be unable or unwilling to make timely principal and/or interest payments, or to otherwise honor its obligations. The degree of risk for a particular security may be reflected in its credit rating. Credit risk is greater for medium quality and lower-rated securities. Lower-rated debt securities and similar unrated securities (commonly known as “junk bonds”) have speculative elements or are predominantly speculative risks.

Liquidity Risk—Liquidity risk exists when particular investments are difficult to purchase or sell, possibly preventing the Portfolio from selling out of these illiquid or relatively less liquid securities at an advantageous price. Causes of liquidity risk may include low trading volume, lack of a market maker, a large position, heavy redemptions, or legal restrictions that limit or prevent a Portfolio from selling securities or closing derivative positions at desirable prices or opportune times. Over recent years, the capacity of dealers to make markets in fixed income securities has been outpaced by the growth in the size of the fixed income markets. Liquidity risk may be magnified in a rising interest rate environment, where the value and liquidity of fixed income securities generally go down. Derivatives and securities involving substantial market and credit risk tend to involve greater liquidity risk. To the extent a Portfolio invests in municipal securities, the Portfolio is subject to more liquidity risk because the market for municipal securities is generally smaller than many other markets. Illiquid securities and relatively less liquid securities may also be difficult to value.

Redemption Risk—A Portfolio may experience heavy redemptions that could cause the Portfolio to liquidate its assets at inopportune times or at a loss or depressed value, which could cause the value of your investment to decline.

Indemnification Risk—In the ordinary course of business, the Portfolio enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Portfolio has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these indemnification provisions and expects the risk of loss thereunder to be remote. Therefore, the Portfolio has not accrued any liability in connection with these indemnification provisions.

 

38     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

NOTE F

Distributions to Shareholders

The tax character of distributions to be paid for the year ending April 30, 2015 will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year. The tax character of distributions paid during the fiscal years ended April 30, 2014 and April 30, 2013 were as follows:

 

     2014      2013  

Distributions paid from:

     

Ordinary income

   $ 1,755,639       $ 1,776,601   

Total taxable distributions

     1,755,639         1,776,601   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total distributions paid

   $     1,755,639       $     1,776,601   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

As of April 30, 2014, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:

 

Undistributed ordinary income

   $ 211,875   

Accumulated capital and other losses

         (1,162,598 )(a) 

Unrealized appreciation/(depreciation)

     1,320,458 (b) 
  

 

 

 

Total accumulated earnings/(deficit)

   $ 369,735 (c) 
  

 

 

 

 

(a)  

On April 30, 2014, the Portfolio had a capital loss carryforward of $1,162,598. During the fiscal year, the Portfolio utilized $26,219 of capital loss carryforwards to offset current year net realized gains.

 

(b)  

The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) are attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales and the tax treatment of swaps.

 

(c)  

The difference between book-basis and tax-basis components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) is attributable primarily to dividends payable.

For tax purposes, net capital losses may be carried over to offset future capital gains, if any. Funds are permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an indefinite period. These post-enactment capital losses must be utilized prior to the pre-enactment capital losses, which are subject to expiration. Post-enactment capital loss carryforwards will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered short-term as under previous regulation. As of April 30, 2014, the Portfolio had a net short-term capital loss carryforward of $1,162,598 which will expire in 2018.

NOTE G

Subsequent Events

Management has evaluated subsequent events for possible recognition or disclosure in the financial statements through the date the financial statements are issued. Management has determined that there are no material events that would require disclosure in the Portfolio’s financial statements through this date.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       39   

Notes to Financial Statements


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Selected Data For A Share Of Beneficial Interest Outstanding Throughout Each Period

 

    Six Months
Ended
October 31,
2014
(unaudited)
    Year Ended April 30,  
      2014     2013     2012     2011     2010  
 

 

 

 
           

Net asset value, beginning of period

    $  11.13        $  11.42        $  10.83        $  10.59        $  10.30        $  8.25   
 

 

 

 

Income From Investment Operations

           

Net investment income(a)

    .22        .42        .43        .46        .54        .59   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

    .11        (.29     .59        .27        .29        2.05   
 

 

 

 

Net increase in net asset value from operations

    .33        .13        1.02        .73        .83        2.64   
 

 

 

 

Less: Dividends

           

Dividends from net investment income

    (.21     (.42     (.43     (.49     (.54     (.59
 

 

 

 

Net asset value, end of period

    $  11.25        $  11.13        $  11.42        $  10.83        $  10.59        $  10.30   
 

 

 

 

Total Return

           

Total investment return based on net asset value(b)

    3.01  %*      1.31  %*      9.53  %*      7.02  %      8.28  %      32.72  % 

Ratios/Supplemental Data

           

Net assets, end of period
(000’s omitted)

    $43,494        $45,989        $42,799        $46,848        $29,520        $34,041   

Ratio to average net assets of:

           

Net investment income

    3.81  %^      3.89  %      3.79  %      4.42  %      5.20  %      6.22  % 

Portfolio turnover rate.

    18  %      61  %      89  %      91  %      33  %      21  % 

 

(a)   Based on average shares outstanding.

 

(b)   Total investment return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value at the beginning of the period, reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at net asset value during the period, and redemption on the last day of the period. Total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Total investment return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized.

 

*   Includes the impact of proceeds received and credited to the Portfolio resulting from class action settlements, which enhanced the Portfolio’s performance for the six months ended October 31, 2014 and years ended April 30, 2014 and April 30, 2013 by 0.01%, 0.05% and 0.03%, respectively.

 

^   Annualized.

See notes to financial statements.

 

40     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

Financial Highlights


BOARD OF TRUSTEES

 

Marshall C. Turner, Jr.(1), Chairman

John H. Dobkin(1)

Michael J. Downey(1)

William H. Foulk, Jr.(1)

D. James Guzy(1)

  

Nancy P. Jacklin(1)

Robert M. Keith, President and Chief Executive Officer

Garry L. Moody(1)

Earl D. Weiner(1)

OFFICERS

Philip L. Kirstein,

Senior Vice President and Independent Compliance Officer

Douglas J. Peebles, Senior Vice President

Shawn E. Keegan(2), Vice President

  

Ashish C. Shah(2), Vice President

Emilie D. Wrapp, Secretary

Joseph J. Mantineo, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Phyllis J. Clarke, Controller

Vincent S. Noto, Chief Compliance Officer

 

Custodian and Accounting Agent

State Street Bank and Trust Company
State Street Corporation CCB/5
1 Iron Street
Boston, MA 02210

 

Principal Underwriter

AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc.
1345 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10105

 

Transfer Agent

AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 786003
San Antonio, TX 78278-6003
Toll-Free (800) 221-5672

  

Legal Counsel

Seward & Kissel LLP

One Battery Park Plaza

New York, NY 10004

 

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Ernst & Young LLP

5 Times Square

New York, NY 10036

 

(1)   Member of the Audit Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Independent Directors Committee.

 

(2)   The day-to-day management of, and investment decisions for, the Trust’s Portfolio are made by the Corporate Income Shares Investment Team. Messrs. Shawn E. Keegan and Ashish C. Shah are the investment professionals primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Trust’s Portfolio.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       41   

Board of Trustees


 

 

THE FOLLOWING IS NOT PART OF THE SHAREHOLDER REPORT OR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SUMMARY OF SENIOR OFFICER’S EVALUATION OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT1

The following is a summary of the evaluation of the Investment Advisory Agreement between AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”) and The AllianceBernstein Corporate Shares (the “Trust”) with respect to AllianceBernstein Corporate Income Shares (the “Portfolio”).2 The evaluation of the Investment Advisory Agreement was prepared by Philip L. Kirstein, the Senior Officer of the Trust, for the Trustees of the Trust, as required by the September 1, 2004 Assurance of Discontinuance (“AoD”) between the Adviser and the New York State Attorney General (the “NYAG”). The Senior Officer’s evaluation of the Investment Advisory Agreement is not meant to diminish the responsibility or authority of the Board of Trustees to perform its duties pursuant to Section 15 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 Act (the “40 Act”) and applicable state law. The purpose of this summary is to provide shareholders with a synopsis of the independent evaluation of the reasonableness of the advisory fees proposed to be paid by the Portfolio which was provided to the Trustees in connection with their review of the proposed approval of the continuance of the Investment Advisory Agreement.

The Senior Officer’s evaluation considered the following factors:

 

  1. Advisory fees charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services;

 

  2. Advisory fees charged by other mutual fund companies for like services;

 

  3. Costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the advisory agreement, excluding any intra-corporate profit;

 

  4. Profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services;

 

  5. Possible economies of scale as the Portfolio grows larger; and

 

  6. Nature and quality of the Adviser’s services including the performance of the Portfolio.

These factors, with the exception of the first factor, are generally referred to as the “Gartenberg factors,” which were articulated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 1982. Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc., 694 F. 2d 923 (2d Cir. 1982). On March 30, 2010, the Supreme Court held the Gartenberg decision was correct in its basic formulation of what Section 36(b) requires: to face liability under Section 36(b), “an investment adviser must charge a fee that is so disproportionately large that it bears no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and could not have been the product of

 

1   The Senior Officer’s fee evaluation was completed on October 23, 2014 and discussed with the Board of Trustees on November 4-6, 2014.

 

2   Future references to the Portfolio do not include “AllianceBernstein.”

 

42     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES


 

 

arm’s length bargaining” Jones v. Harris Associates L.P., 130 S. Ct. 1418 (2010). In Jones, the Court stated the Gartenberg approach fully incorporates the correct understanding of fiduciary duty within the context of Section 36(b) and noted with approval that “Gartenberg insists that all relevant circumstances be taken into account” and “uses the range of fees that might result from arm’s-length bargaining as the benchmark for reviewing challenged fees.”3

PORTFOLIO’S EXEMPTION FROM ADVISORY FEES OR EXPENSES

The Portfolio pays no advisory fee to the Adviser for receiving the services to be provided pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement. The Portfolio is designed to serve the needs of providers of separately managed accounts (“SMAs”).4 Since SMA clients pay their wrap program provider a unitary fee for managing all investments of their portfolio, the Portfolio will not pay an advisory fee. The Adviser will also reimburse the Portfolio for all of its other operating expenses, except certain extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage costs and the interest on borrowed money.

The Portfolio’s net assets on September 30, 2014 are set forth below:

 

Portfolio   9/30/14
Net Assets ($MM)
Corporate Income Shares   $    43.7

The Portfolio, which offers only one no-load class of shares, is distributed through its principal underwriter, AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (“ABI”). Since the Portfolio is reimbursed by the Adviser for its operating expenses, the Portfolio does not have a distribution plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 40 Act.

 

I. ADVISORY FEES CHARGED TO INSTITUTIONAL AND OTHER CLIENTS

The advisory fees charged to investment companies which the Adviser manages and sponsors are normally higher than those charged to similar sized institutional accounts, including pension plans and sub-advised investment companies. The fee differential reflects, among other things, different services provided to such clients, and different liabilities assumed. Services provided by the Adviser to the Portfolio that are not provided to non-investment company clients include providing office space and personnel to serve as Fund Officers, who among other responsibilities make the certifications required under the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, and coordinating with and monitoring the Portfolio’s third party service providers such as Fund counsel, auditors, custodians, transfer agents and pricing services. The accounting, administrative, legal and compliance requirements for the Portfolio are more costly than those for institutional client assets due to the

 

3   Jones v. Harris at 1427.

 

4   The wrap program providers that offer SMAs currently employ the Adviser as one of several investment managers, and compensate the Adviser on the basis of all SMA assets managed by it, which would include assets of Corporate Income Shares.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       43   


 

 

greater complexities and time required for investment companies. The Adviser also believes that it incurs substantial entrepreneurial risk when offering a new mutual fund since establishing a new mutual fund requires a large upfront investment and it may take a long time for the fund to achieve profitability since the fund must be priced to scale from inception in order to be competitive and assets are acquired one account at a time. In addition, managing the cash flow of an investment company may be more difficult than that of a stable pool of assets, such as an institutional account with little cash movement in either direction, particularly if the Portfolio is in net redemption and the Adviser is frequently forced to sell securities to raise cash for redemptions. However, managing a fund with positive cash flow may be easier at times than managing a stable pool of assets. Finally, in recent years, investment advisers have been sued by institutional clients and have suffered reputational damage both by the attendant publicity and outcomes other than complete victories. Accordingly, the legal and reputational risks associated with institutional accounts are greater than previously thought, although arguably still not equal to those related to the mutual fund industry.

Notwithstanding the Adviser’s view that managing an investment company is not comparable to managing other institutional accounts because the services provided are different, the Supreme Court has indicated consideration should be given to the advisory fees charged to institutional accounts with a similar investment style as the Portfolio.5 However, with respect to the Portfolio, the Adviser represented that there is no institutional product in the Adviser’s Form ADV that has a similar investment style as the Portfolio.

The Adviser represented that it does provide sub-advisory services to other companies that have a substantially similar investment style as the Portfolio.

 

II. MANAGEMENT FEES CHARGED BY OTHER MUTUAL FUND COMPANIES FOR LIKE SERVICES.

Lipper, Inc., an analytical service that is not affiliated with the Adviser, compared the fees charged to the Portfolio to the fees charged to other investment

 

5   The Supreme Court stated that “courts may give such comparisons the weight that they merit in light of the similarities and differences between the services that the clients in question require, but the courts must be wary of inapt comparisons.” Among the significant differences the Supreme Court noted that may exist between services provided to mutual funds and institutional accounts are “higher marketing costs.” Jones v. Harris at 1428.

 

 

44     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES


 

 

companies for similar services by other investment advisers.6,7 Each peer selected by Lipper had a similar fee arrangement as the Portfolio, which is to say that with respect to the Portfolio’s peers, all of their fund expenses, including management fees, were reimbursed by their respective investment advisers.8

The Portfolio does not pay an advisory fee to the Adviser since the SMA clients pay their wrap program provider a unitary fee for managing all investments of their portfolios. In addition, the Adviser reimburses the Portfolio for all of its operating expenses, except certain extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage costs and interest on borrowed money.

 

III. COSTS TO THE ADVISER AND ITS AFFILIATES OF SUPPLYING SERVICES PURSUANT TO THE ADVISORY FEE ARRANGEMENT, EXCLUDING ANY INTRA-CORPORATE PROFIT.

The Adviser utilizes two profitability reporting systems, which operate independently but are aligned with each other, to estimate the Adviser’s profitability in connection with investment advisory services provided to the Portfolio. The Senior Officer has retained a consultant to provide independent advice regarding the alignment of the two profitability systems as well as the methodologies and allocations utilized by both profitability systems. See Section IV for additional discussion.

 

IV. PROFIT MARGINS OF THE ADVISER AND ITS AFFILIATES FOR SUPPLYING SUCH SERVICES.

The profitability information for the Portfolio, prepared by the Adviser for the Board of Trustees, was reviewed by the Senior Officer and the consultant. The Portfolio does not pay an advisory fee to the Adviser. However, the Adviser does profit indirectly through the advisory fees that it receives from the wrap program providers whose SMA clients invest in the Portfolio. The Adviser’s profitability with respect to the Portfolio, which was negative in 2013, was calculated using a weighted average of the profitability of the relevant SMA assets, in addition to any fund specific revenue or expense items.

 

6   The Supreme Court cautioned against accepting mutual fund fee comparisons without careful scrutiny since “these comparisons are problematic because these fees, like those challenged, may not be the product of negotiations conducted at arm’s length.” Jones v. Harris at 1429.

 

7   Only zero fee no-load funds that participated in a wrap fee program were considered for inclusion in the Portfolio’s EG, regardless of the Lipper investment classification/objective of the Funds’ peers. The Portfolio’s EG peers includes two BBB-rated Corporate Debt Funds (“BBB”), three Multi-Sector Income Fund (“MSI”), one Short-Intermediate Investment Grade Debt Fund (“SII”), three General Bond Funds (“GB”), two Core Bond Funds (“IID”), one General & Insured Municipal Debt Fund (“GM”), one Inflation-Protected Bond Fund (“IUT”), two Global Income Funds (“GLI”) and one Intermediate Municipal Debt Fund (“IMD”). The Portfolio is classified by Lipper as an A-rated Corporate Debt Fund (“A”).

 

8   “Management Fee” is the fee attributable to the management and bearing of expenses of the funds (not the management of the wrap fee program). In each case, the advisory contract provides for an advisory or management fee of zero.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       45   


 

 

AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (“ABI”) and AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc. (“ABIS”), affiliates of the Adviser, serve as the Portfolio’s underwriter and transfer agent, respectively. The courts have referred to this type of business relationships as “fall-out benefits” to the Adviser and indicated that such benefits should be factored into the evaluation of the total relationship between the Portfolio and the Adviser. Neither case law nor common business practice precludes the Adviser’s affiliates from earning a reasonable profit on this type of relationship provided the affiliates’ charges and services are competitive. However, neither ABI nor ABIS receive a fee for serving as the Portfolio’s underwriter and transfer agent.

 

V. POSSIBLE ECONOMIES OF SCALE

The Adviser has indicated that economies of scale are being shared with shareholders through pricing to scale, breakpoints, fee reductions/waivers and enhancement to services.

In May 2012, an independent consultant, retained by the Senior Officer, provided the Board of Trustees information on the Adviser’s firm-wide average costs from 2005 through 2011 and the potential economies of scale. The independent consultant noted that from 2005 through 2007 the Adviser experienced significant growth in assets under management (“AUM”). During this period, operating expenses increased, in part to keep up with growth, and in part reflecting market returns. However, from 2008 through the first quarter of 2009, AUM rapidly and significantly decreased due to declines in market value and client withdrawals. When AUM rapidly decreased, some operating expenses categories, including base compensation and office space, adjusted more slowly during this period, resulting in an increase in average costs. Since 2009, AUM has experienced less significant changes. The independent consultant noted that changes in operating expenses reflect changes in business composition and business practices in response to changes in financial markets. Finally, the independent consultant concluded that the increase in average cost and the decline in net operating margin across the Adviser since late 2008 are inconsistent with the view that there are currently reductions in average costs due to economies of scale that can be shared with the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds managed by the Adviser through lower fees.

Previously, in February 2008, the independent consultant provided the Board of Trustees an update of the Deli9 study on advisory fees and various fund characteristics.10 The independent consultant first reiterated the results of his previous two dimensional comparison analysis (fund size and family size) with

 

9   The Deli study, originally published in 2002 based on 1997 data and updated for the February 2008 Presentation, may be of diminished value due to the age of the data used in the presentation and the changes experienced in the industry since 2008.

 

10   As mentioned previously, the Supreme Court cautioned against accepting mutual fund fee comparisons without careful scrutiny since the fees may not be the product of negotiations conducted at arm’s length. See Jones V. Harris at 1429.

 

46     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES


 

 

the Board of Trustees.11 The independent consultant then discussed the results of the regression model that was utilized to study the effects of various factors on advisory fees. The regression model output indicated that the bulk of the variation in fees predicted were explained by various factors, but substantially by fund AUM, family AUM, index fund indicator and investment style. The independent consultant also compared the advisory fees of the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds to similar funds managed by 19 other large asset managers, regardless of the fund size and each Adviser’s proportion of mutual fund assets to non-mutual fund assets.

 

VI. NATURE AND QUALITY OF THE ADVISER’S SERVICES INCLUDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PORTFOLIO

With assets under management of approximately $473 billion as of September 30, 2014, the Adviser has the investment experience to manage and provide non-investment services (described in Section I) to the Portfolio.

The information below, prepared by Lipper, shows the 1,3 and 5 year gross performance returns and rankings of the Portfolio relative to its Lipper Performance Universe (“PU”)12 for the period ended July 31, 2014:

 

      Portfolio
Return
(%)
     PU
Median
(%)
     PU
Rank
 
Corporate Income Shares         

1 Year

     8.36         6.99         4/11   

3 Year

     5.61         5.11         4/11   

5 Year

     8.69         7.16         4/9   

 

11   The two dimensional analysis showed patterns of lower advisory fees for funds with larger asset sizes and funds from larger family sizes compared to funds with smaller asset sizes and funds from smaller family sizes, which according to the independent consultant is indicative of a sharing of economies of scale and scope. However, in less liquid and active markets, such is not the case, as the empirical analysis showed potential for diseconomies of scale in those markets. The empirical analysis also showed diminishing economies of scale and scope as funds surpassed a certain high level of assets.

 

12   The Portfolio’s PU includes peers with the same Lipper investment classification/objective and load type as the Portfolio.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       47   


 

 

Set forth below are the 1, 3 and 5 year and since inception net performance returns of the Portfolio (in bold)13 versus its benchmark.14 Portfolio and benchmark volatility and reward-to-variability ratio (“Sharpe Ratio”) information is also shown.15

 

    

Periods Ending July 31, 2014

Annualized Net Performance

 
    Annualized        
     1 Year
(%)
    3 Year
(%)
    5 Year
(%)
    Since
Inception
(%)
    Volatility
(%)
    Sharpe
(%)
    Risk
Period
(Year)
 
Corporate Income Shares     8.36        5.61        8.69        6.84        4.36        1.24        5   
Barclays Capital U.S. Credit Index     6.64        5.03        6.84        5.98        4.06        1.19        5   
Inception Date: December 11, 2006         

CONCLUSION:

Based on the factors discussed above the Senior Officer’s conclusion is that the Investment Advisory Agreement for the Portfolio is reasonable and within the range of what would have been negotiated at arm’s-length in light of all the surrounding circumstances. This conclusion with respect to the Portfolio is based on an evaluation of all of these factors and no single factor was dispositive.

Dated: November 18, 2014

 

13   The performance returns of the Portfolio were provided Lipper. Lipper maintains its own database that includes the Portfolio’s performance returns.

 

14   The Adviser provided Portfolio and benchmark performance return information for the periods through July 31, 2014.

 

15   Portfolio and benchmark volatility and Sharpe Ratio information was obtained through Lipper LANA, a database maintained by Lipper. Volatility is a statistical measure of the tendency of a market price or yield to vary over time. A Sharpe Ratio is a risk adjusted measure of return that divides a fund’s return in excess of the riskless return by the fund’s standard deviation. A portfolio with a greater volatility would be viewed as more risky than a portfolio with equivalent performance but lower volatility; for that reason, a greater return would be demanded for the more risky fund. A portfolio with a higher Sharpe Ratio would be viewed as better performing than a fund with a lower Sharpe Ratio.

 

48     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES


THIS PAGE IS NOT PART OF THE SHAREHOLDER REPORT OR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN FAMILY OF FUNDS

 

US Equity

US Core

Core Opportunities Fund

Select US Equity Portfolio

US Growth

Concentrated Growth Fund

Discovery Growth Fund

Growth Fund

Large Cap Growth Fund

Small Cap Growth Portfolio

US Value

Discovery Value Fund

Equity Income Fund

Growth & Income Fund

Value Fund

International/Global Equity

International/Global Core

Global Equity & Covered Call Strategy Fund

Global Thematic Growth Fund

International Portfolio

Tax-Managed International Portfolio

International/Global Growth

International Growth Fund

International/Global Value

International Value Fund

Fixed Income

Municipal

High Income Municipal Portfolio

Intermediate California Portfolio

Intermediate Diversified Portfolio

Intermediate New York Portfolio

Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy

Tax-Aware Fixed Income Portfolio

National Portfolio

Arizona Portfolio

California Portfolio

Massachusetts Portfolio

Michigan Portfolio

Minnesota Portfolio

New Jersey Portfolio

New York Portfolio

Ohio Portfolio

Pennsylvania Portfolio

Virginia Portfolio

Taxable

Bond Inflation Strategy

Global Bond Fund

Fixed Income (continued)

Taxable

High Income Fund

High Yield Portfolio

Intermediate Bond Portfolio

Limited Duration High Income Portfolio

Short Duration Portfolio

Alternatives

All Market Real Return Portfolio*

Credit Long/Short Portfolio

Global Real Estate Investment Fund

Long/Short Multi-Manager Fund

Market Neutral Strategy-U.S.

Multi-Manager Alternative Strategies Fund

Select US Long/Short Portfolio

Unconstrained Bond Fund

Multi-Asset

All Market Growth Portfolio*

Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio

Global Risk Allocation Fund

Retirement Strategies

2000 Retirement Strategy

2005 Retirement Strategy

2010 Retirement Strategy

2015 Retirement Strategy

2020 Retirement Strategy

2025 Retirement Strategy

2030 Retirement Strategy

2035 Retirement Strategy

2040 Retirement Strategy

2045 Retirement Strategy

2050 Retirement Strategy

2055 Retirement Strategy

Wealth Strategies

Balanced Wealth Strategy

Conservative Wealth Strategy

Wealth Appreciation Strategy

Tax-Managed Balanced Wealth Strategy

Tax-Managed Conservative Wealth Strategy

Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy

Closed-End Funds

Alliance California Municipal Income Fund

Alliance New York Municipal Income Fund

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund

AllianceBernstein Income Fund

AllianceBernstein Multi-Manager Alternative Fund

AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund

 

We also offer Exchange Reserves, which serves as the money market fund exchange vehicle for the AllianceBernstein mutual funds. An investment in Exchange Reserves is not a deposit in a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. For copies of our prospectus or summary prospectus, which contain this and other information, visit us online at www.alliancebernstein.com or contact your AllianceBernstein investments representative. Please read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

* Prior to December 15, 2014, All Market Growth Portfolio was named Dynamic All Market Fund; All Market Real Return Portfolio was named Real Asset Strategy.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       49   

AllianceBernstein Family of Funds


NOTES

 

 

50     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES


NOTES

 

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES       51   


NOTES

 

 

52     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES


ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CORPORATE INCOME SHARES

1345 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10105

800.221.5672

 

LOGO

 

 

CIS-0152-1014   LOGO


SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

 

AllianceBernstein

Municipal Income Shares

 

 

 

 

October 31, 2014

 

Semi-Annual Report

 

LOGO


 

Investment Products Offered

 

• Are Not FDIC Insured

• May Lose Value

• Are Not Bank Guaranteed

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. For copies of our prospectus or summary prospectus, which contain this and other information, visit us online at www.alliancebernstein.com or contact your AllianceBernstein Investments representative. Please read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

This shareholder report must be preceded or accompanied by the Fund’s prospectus for individuals who are not current shareholders of the Fund.

You may obtain a description of the Fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, and information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, without charge. Simply visit AllianceBernstein’s website at www.alliancebernstein.com, or go to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “Commission”) website at www.sec.gov, or call AllianceBernstein at (800) 227-4618.

The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. The Fund’s Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC; information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.

AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (ABI) is the distributor of the AllianceBernstein family of mutual funds. ABI is a member of FINRA and is an affiliate of AllianceBernstein L.P., the manager of the funds.

AllianceBernstein® and the AB Logo are registered trademarks and service marks used by permission of the owner, AllianceBernstein L.P.


December 12, 2014

 

Semi-Annual Report

This report provides management’s discussion of fund performance for AllianceBernstein Municipal Income Shares (the “Fund”) for the semi-annual reporting period ended October 31, 2014. Please note, shares of this Fund are offered exclusively through registered investment advisers approved by AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”).

Investment Objectives and Policies

The investment objective of the Fund is to earn the highest level of current income, exempt from federal taxation, that is available consistent with what the Adviser considers to be an appropriate level of risk. The Fund pursues its objective by investing principally in high-yielding municipal securities that may be non-investment grade or investment grade. As a matter of fundamental policy, the Fund invests, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets in municipal securities that pay interest that is exempt from federal income tax. These securities may pay interest that is subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) for certain taxpayers.

The Fund may invest without limit in lower-rated securities (“junk bonds”), which may include securities having the lowest rating, and in unrated securities that, in the Adviser’s judgment, would be lower-rated securities if rated. The Fund may invest in fixed income securities with any maturity or duration. The Fund will seek to increase income for shareholders by investing in longer maturity bonds. Consistent with its objective of seeking a higher level of income, the Fund may experience greater volatility and a higher risk of loss of principal than other municipal funds.

The Fund may also invest in tender option bond transactions (“TOBs”);

forward commitments; zero coupon municipal securities and variable, floating and inverse floating rate municipal securities; certain types of mortgage related securities; and derivatives, such as options, futures, forwards and swaps.

The Fund may make short sales of securities or maintain a short position, and may use other investment techniques. The Fund may use leverage for investment purposes to increase income through the use of TOBs and derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps.

Investment Results

The table on page 5 shows the Fund’s performance compared to its benchmark, the Barclays Municipal Bond Index, for the six- and 12-month periods ended October 31, 2014.

The Fund outperformed its benchmark for both periods. The Fund is used generally to provide exposure to lower-rated municipal bonds within separately managed account strategies. As such, the Fund is overweight lower-rated bonds relative to the broad municipal market, as represented by the Barclays Municipal Bond Index. This positioning resulted in the Fund outperforming the benchmark over both periods, as lower-rated bonds generally outperformed. In addition, for the 12-month period, security selection in the health care, transportation and education sectors contributed, as did overweights in the health care and industrial sectors, and an underweight to the pre-refunded sector. Security selection in the power and state general obligation sectors detracted.

For the six-month period, security selection in the health care, education and transportation sectors contributed to returns, as did an overweight to the health care and industrial sectors and an

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       1   


underweight to the state general obligation sector. Detracting from returns for the six-month period was security selection in the industrial, power and state general obligation sectors.

The Fund used derivatives for hedging purposes. Credit default swaps had no material impact on performance for the six- and 12-month periods; purchased options had no material impact on returns for the six-month period and added to returns for the 12-month period.

Market Review and Investment Strategy

Limited supply and continued demand supported municipal bond prices over the six- and 12-month periods ended October 31, 2014. As a result, municipal issues outperformed most other bond sectors. According to estimates by the Municipal Bond Investment Team (the “Team”) municipal yields declined between 0.10% and 0.50% over the six-month period and between 0.35% and roughly 1% over the 12-month period. During both periods, the yields for long-maturity bonds declined more than yields for shorter-maturity bonds and municipal bonds generally outperformed Treasury bonds. In the last few months of the reporting period, volatility increased in the markets in response multiple factors: stronger U.S. economic growth prompted concerns that the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) might raise interest rates sooner than expected; faltering economic growth overseas; and strife in

the Middle East and Ukraine also heightened uncertainty.

The Team also targeted medium-grade, primarily BBB credit quality* bonds, as an attractive part of the market to overweight. This strategy has allowed the Fund to capture historically high yields relative to AAA bonds. In addition, the Team expects the yield spread (the amount by which a bond’s yield exceeds the yield of AAA-rated bonds) of such bonds to fall (improving prices) when the Fed begins to increase rates.

The Fund may purchase municipal securities that are insured under policies issued by certain insurance companies. Historically, insured municipal securities typically received a higher credit rating, which meant that the issuer of the securities paid a lower interest rate. As a result of declines in the credit quality and associated downgrades of most fund insurers, insurance has less value than it did in the past. The market now values insured municipal securities primarily based on the credit quality of the issuer of the security with little value given to the insurance feature. In purchasing such insured securities, the Adviser evaluates the risk and return of municipal securities through its own research. If an insurance company’s rating is downgraded or the company becomes insolvent, the prices of municipal securities insured by the insurance company may decline. As of October 31, 2014, the Fund’s percentages of investments in municipal bonds that are insured and in insured municipal bonds that have been pre-refunded or escrowed to maturity are 0.71% and 0%, respectively.

 

*   A measure of the quality and safety of a bond or portfolio, based on the issuer’s financial condition and not of the Fund itself. AAA is highest (best) and D is lowest (worst). Investment grade securities are those rated BBB and above. Ratings are subject to change. If applicable, the pre-refunded category includes bonds which are secured by U.S. Government Securities and therefore have been deemed high-quality investment grade by the Adviser.

 

2     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES


DISCLOSURES AND RISKS

Benchmark Disclosure

The unmanaged Barclays Municipal Bond Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a fund. The Barclays Municipal Bond Index represents the performance of the long-term tax-exempt bond market consisting of investment-grade bonds. An investor cannot invest directly in an index, and its results are not indicative of the performance for any specific investment, including the Fund.

A Word About Risk

Market Risk: The value of the Fund’s assets will fluctuate as the stock or bond market fluctuates. The value of the Fund’s investments may decline, sometimes rapidly and unpredictably, simply because of economic changes or other events that affect large portions of the market.

Credit Risk: An issuer or guarantor of a fixed-income security, or the counterparty to a derivatives or other contract, may be unable or unwilling to make timely payments of interest or principal, or to otherwise honor its obligations. The issuer or guarantor may default, causing a loss of the full principal amount of a security. The degree of risk for a particular security may be reflected in its credit rating. There is the possibility that the credit rating of a fixed-income security may be downgraded after purchase, which may adversely affect the value of the security. Investments in fixed income securities with lower ratings tend to have a higher probability that an issuer will default or fail to meet its payment obligations.

Municipal Market Risk: This is the risk that special factors may adversely affect the value of municipal securities and have a significant effect on the yield or value of the Fund’s investments in municipal securities. These factors include economic conditions, political or legislative changes, uncertainties related to the tax status of municipal securities, or the rights of investors in these securities. To the extent that the Fund invests more of its assets in a particular state’s municipal securities, the Fund may be vulnerable to events adversely affecting that state, including economic, political and regulatory occurrences, court decisions, terrorism and catastrophic natural disasters, such as hurricanes or earthquakes. The Fund’s investments in certain municipal securities with principal and interest payments that are made from the revenues of a specific project or facility, and not general tax revenues, may have increased risks. Factors affecting the project or facility, such as local business or economic conditions, could have a significant effect on the project’s ability to make payments of principal and interest on these securities.

Tax Risk: There is no guarantee that all of the Fund’s income will remain exempt from federal or state income taxes. From time to time, the U.S. Government and the U.S. Congress consider changes in federal tax law that could limit or eliminate the federal tax exemption for municipal bond income, which would in effect reduce the income received by shareholders from the Fund by increasing taxes on that income. In such event, the Fund’s net asset value (“NAV”) could also decline as yields on municipal bonds, which are typically lower than those on taxable bonds, would be expected to increase to approximately the yield of comparable taxable bonds. Actions or anticipated actions affecting the tax exempt status of municipal bonds could also result in significant shareholder redemptions of Fund shares as investors anticipate adverse effects on the Fund or seek higher yields to offset the potential loss of the tax deduction. As a result, the Fund would be required to maintain higher levels of cash to meet the redemptions, which would negatively affect the Fund’s yield.

Interest Rate Risk: Changes in interest rates will affect the value of investments in fixed-income securities. When interest rates rise, the value of investments in fixed- income securities tends to fall and this decrease in value may not be offset by higher

 

(Disclosures, Risks and Note about Historical Performance continued on next page)

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       3   

Disclosures and Risks


DISCLOSURES AND RISKS

(continued from previous page)

 

income from new investments. Interest rate risk is generally greater for fixed-income securities with longer maturities or durations.

Inflation Risk: This is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the value of the Fund’s assets can decline as can the value of the Fund’s distributions. This risk is significantly greater for fixed-income securities with longer maturities.

Leverage Risk: To the extent the Fund uses leveraging techniques, its NAV may be more volatile because leverage tends to exaggerate the effect of changes in interest rates and any increase or decrease in the value of the Fund’s investments.

Liquidity Risk: Liquidity risk exists when particular investments, such as lower-rated securities, are difficult to purchase or sell, possibly preventing the Fund from selling out of these illiquid securities at an advantageous price. The Fund is subject to liquidity risk because the market for municipal securities is generally smaller than many other markets. Derivatives and securities involving substantial market and credit risk tend to involve greater liquidity risk.

Derivatives Risk: Investments in derivatives may be illiquid, difficult to price, and leveraged so that small changes may produce disproportionate losses for the Fund, and may be subject to counterparty risk to a greater degree than more traditional investments.

Management Risk: The Fund is subject to management risk because it is an actively managed investment fund. The Adviser will apply its investment techniques and risk analyses in making investment decisions, but there is no guarantee that its techniques will produce the intended results.

These risks are fully discussed in the Fund’s prospectus.

An Important Note About Historical Performance

The performance shown on the following pages represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance information shown. You may obtain performance information current to the most recent month-end by calling (800) 227-4618. The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate, so that your shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. For copies of our prospectus and/or summary prospectus, which contain this and other information, visit us online at www.alliancebernstein.com or contact your AllianceBernstein Investments representative. Please read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

 

4     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Disclosures and Risks


HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE

 

        
THE FUND VS. ITS BENCHMARK
PERIODS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2014 (unaudited)
  NAV Returns      
  6 Months        12 Months       
AllianceBernstein Municipal Income Shares     6.58%           15.80%     

 

Barclays Municipal Bond Index     3.59%           7.82%     

 

      Please keep in mind that high, double-digit returns are highly unusual and cannot be sustained. Investors should also be aware that these returns were primarily achieved during favorable market conditions.

        

 

AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURNS AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2014 (unaudited)  
     NAV Returns  
  

1 Year

     15.80

Since Inception*

     7.92
  

SEC AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURNS

AS OF THE MOST RECENT CALENDAR QUARTER-END

SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 (unaudited)

 
     SEC Returns  
  

1 Year

     15.59

Since Inception*

     7.77

The prospectus fee table shows the fees and the total fund operating expenses of the Fund as 0.00% (excluding interest expense of 0.01%) because the Adviser does not charge any fees or expenses and reimburses or pays for Fund operating expenses. Participants in a wrap fee program or other investment program eligible to invest in the Fund pay fees to the program sponsor and should review the program brochure or other literature provided by the sponsor for a discussion of fees and expenses charged.

 

 

*   Inception date: 9/1/2010.

See Disclosures, Risks and Note about Historical Performance on pages 3-4.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       5   

Historical Performance


EXPENSE EXAMPLE

(unaudited)

 

As a shareholder of the Fund, you may incur various ongoing non-operating and extraordinary costs. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.

The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period as indicated below.

Actual Expenses

The table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes

The table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed annual rate of return of 5% before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds by comparing this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), or contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions. Therefore, the hypothetical example is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

 

     Beginning
Account Value
May 1, 2014
     Ending
Account Value
October 31, 2014
     Expenses Paid
During Period*
     Annualized
Expense Ratio*
 

Actual

   $     1,000       $     1,065.80       $     0.36         0.07

Hypothetical**

   $ 1,000       $ 1,024.85       $ 0.36         0.07
*   Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio (interest expense incurred) multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Fund’s operating expenses are borne by the Adviser or its affiliates.

 

**   Assumes 5% annual return before expenses.

 

6     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Expense Example


PORTFOLIO SUMMARY

October 31, 2014 (unaudited)

 

PORTFOLIO STATISTICS

Net Assets ($mil): $481.3

 

LOGO

 

 

*   All data are as of October 31, 2014. The Fund’s quality rating breakdown is expressed as a percentage of the Fund’s total investments in municipal securities and may vary over time. The Fund also enters into derivative transactions, which may be used for hedging or investment purposes (see “Portfolio of Investments” section of the report for additional details). The quality ratings are determined by using the Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”), Moody’s Investors Services, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and Fitch Ratings, Ltd. (“Fitch”). The Fund considers the credit ratings issued by S&P, Moody’s and Fitch and uses the highest rating issued by the agencies, including when there is a split rating. These are a measure of the quality and safety of a bond or portfolio, based on the issuer’s financial condition. AAA is the highest (best) and D is the lowest (worst). If applicable, the pre-refunded category includes bonds which are secured by US Government Securities and therefore are deemed high-quality investment grade by the Adviser. If applicable, Not Applicable (N/A) includes non credit worthy investments; such as, equities, currency contracts, futures and options. If applicable, the Not Rated category includes bonds that are not rated by a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization. The Adviser evaluates the creditworthiness of non-rated securities based on a number of factors including, but not limited to, cash flows, enterprise value and economic environment.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       7   

Portfolio Summary


PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

October 31, 2014 (unaudited)

 

     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS – 97.6%

    

Long-Term Municipal Bonds – 92.5%

    

Alabama – 3.9%

    

County of Jefferson AL
(County of Jefferson AL Sch Warrants)
Series 2004A
5.00%, 1/01/24

   $ 2,000      $ 2,031,960   

County of Jefferson AL Sewer Revenue
Series 2013D
6.00%, 10/01/42

     11,645        12,703,414   

Cullman County Health Care Authority
(Cullman Regional Medical Center, Inc.)
Series 2009A
7.00%, 2/01/36

     400        435,588   

Selma Industrial Development Board
(International Paper Co.)
Series 2010A
5.80%, 5/01/34

     200        229,126   

Special Care Facilities Financing Authority of the
City of Pell City Alabama
(Noland Health Services, Inc.)
Series 2012
5.00%, 12/01/31

     3,000        3,285,600   
    

 

 

 
       18,685,688   
    

 

 

 

Alaska – 0.0%

    

City of Koyukuk AK
(Tanana Chiefs Conference)
Series 2011
7.75%, 10/01/41

     100        110,409   
    

 

 

 

Arizona – 1.1%

    

Arizona Health Facilities Authority
(Beatitudes Campus (The))
Series 2007
5.10%, 10/01/22

     200        200,818   

5.20%, 10/01/37

     1,575        1,494,155   

Downtown Phoenix Hotel Corp.
(Downtown Phoenix Hotel Corp. Hotel Occupancy Tax)
FGIC Series 2005A
5.00%, 7/01/40

     150        150,441   

Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix (The)
(Great Hearts Academies)
Series 2014
5.00%, 7/01/44

     2,975        3,036,493   

Mohave County Industrial Development Authority
(Mohave Prison LLC)
Series 2008
8.00%, 5/01/25

     100        116,644   

 

8     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Quechan Indian Tribe of Fort Yuma
Series 2012A
9.75%, 5/01/25

   $ 100      $ 115,817   

Salt Verde Financial Corp.
(Citigroup, Inc.)
Series 2007
5.00%, 12/01/37

     150        169,772   
    

 

 

 
       5,284,140   
    

 

 

 

California – 7.9%

    

Abag Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corps.
(Episcopal Senior Communities)
Series 2011
6.125%, 7/01/41

     100        115,524   

Bay Area Toll Authority
Series 2013S
5.00%, 4/01/27

     1,000        1,178,490   

California Educational Facilities Authority
(University of the Pacific)
Series 2012A
5.00%, 11/01/42

     100        107,051   

California Municipal Finance Authority
(Azusa Pacific University)
Series 2011B
7.75%, 4/01/31

     85        104,252   

California Municipal Finance Authority
(Goodwill Industries of Sacramento Valley & Northern Nevada, Inc.)
Series 2012A
6.625%, 1/01/32

     1,000        1,091,640   

California Municipal Finance Authority
(Partnerships Uplift Cmnty Proj)
Series 2012A
5.30%, 8/01/47

     1,025        1,050,399   

California Municipal Finance Authority
(Rocketship Education)
Series 2014A
7.00%, 6/01/34

     1,200        1,357,260   

7.25%, 6/01/43

     2,075        2,344,148   

California Municipal Finance Authority
(Rocketship Seven-Alma Academy)
Series 2012A
6.25%, 6/01/43

     765        833,177   

California Pollution Control Financing Authority
(Poseidon Resources Channelside LP)
Series 2012
5.00%, 11/21/45(a)

     10,650        11,324,145   

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       9   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

California School Finance Authority
(Partnerships Uplift Cmnty Valley Proj)
Series 2014A
6.40%, 8/01/34

   $ 3,000      $ 3,380,520   

California School Finance Authority
(TRI Valley Learning Corp.)
Series 2012A
7.00%, 6/01/47

     745        804,503   

California Statewide Communities Development Authority
(Eskaton Properties, Inc. Obligated Group)
Series 2012
5.25%, 11/15/34

     530        560,920   

California Statewide Communities Development Authority
(Front Porch Communities & Services)
Series 2007A
5.125%, 4/01/37(a)

     100        101,617   

California Statewide Communities Development Authority
(Rocketship Four-Mosaic Elementary)
Series 2011A
8.50%, 12/01/41

     100        121,560   

California Statewide Communities Development Authority
(Rocklin Academy)
Series 2011A
8.25%, 6/01/41

     140        161,403   

California Statewide Communities Development Authority
(Terraces at San Joaquin Gardens (The))
Series 2012A
6.00%, 10/01/47

     250        267,158   

City of San Buenaventura CA
(Community Memorial Health System)
Series 2011
7.50%, 12/01/41

     100        120,823   

City of San Jose CA Airport Revenue
AMBAC Series 2007A
5.00%, 3/01/37

     100        105,626   

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp.
Series 2007A-1
5.125%, 6/01/47

     5,695        4,239,757   

Los Angeles CA Dept Wtr Pwr
5.00%, 7/01/31(b)

     1,000        1,174,750   

San Francisco City & County Redevelopment Agency
(Mission Bay South Public Imp)
Series 2013A
5.00%, 8/01/31

     1,000        1,070,740   

 

10     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency
Series 2014A
5.00%, 1/15/44(c)

   $ 1,450      $ 1,554,008   

Series 2014B
5.25%, 1/15/44(c)

     1,000        1,064,080   

Southern California Logistics Airport Authority XLCA Series 2006
5.00%, 12/01/36-12/01/43

     1,685        1,455,272   

Tobacco Securitization Authority of Southern California
(San Diego County Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp.)
Series 2006A1-SNR
5.125%, 6/01/46

     1,500        1,168,815   

Univ of California CA Revenues
5.00%, 5/15/33(b)

     1,000        1,169,990   
    

 

 

 
       38,027,628   
    

 

 

 

Colorado – 3.4%

    

Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority
(Skyview Academy)
Series 2014
5.125%, 7/01/34(a)

     775        797,855   
    

5.375%, 7/01/44(a)

     1,360        1,401,738   

Colorado Health Facilities Authority
(Catholic Health Initiatives)
Series 2013
5.25%, 1/01/40

     5,910        6,655,842   

Colorado Health Facilities Authority
(Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Obligated Group)
Series 2012
5.00%, 12/01/42

     2,910        3,108,200   

E-470 Public Highway Authority
Series 2010C
5.375%, 9/01/26

     1,000        1,155,430   

Foothills Metropolitan District
Series 2014
6.00%, 12/01/38

     1,000        1,003,690   

Park Creek Metropolitan District
Series 2005
5.50%, 12/01/37

     200        205,198   

Plaza Metropolitan District No 1
Series 2013
5.00%, 12/01/40

     1,500        1,564,890   

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       11   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Regional Transportation District
(Denver Transit Partners LLC)
Series 2010
6.00%, 1/15/41

   $ 200      $ 224,174   
    

 

 

 
       16,117,017   
    

 

 

 

Connecticut – 1.5%

    

State of Connecticut
Series 2013E
5.00%, 8/15/31(b)

     1,000        1,168,420   

State of Connecticut Special Tax Revenue
Series 2012
5.00%, 1/01/31

     5,000        5,792,950   
    

 

 

 
       6,961,370   
    

 

 

 

Delaware – 0.3%

    

Delaware State Economic Development Authority
(Newark Charter School, Inc.)
Series 2012
5.00%, 9/01/42

     1,310        1,372,906   
    

 

 

 

District of Columbia – 0.3%

    

District of Columbia
(Center for Strategic International Studies, Inc.)
Series 2011
6.625%, 3/01/41

     100        108,876   

District of Columbia
(Friendship Public Charter School, Inc.)
Series 2012
5.00%, 6/01/42

     1,420        1,477,311   
    

 

 

 
       1,586,187   
    

 

 

 

Florida – 8.8%

    

Alachua County Health Facilities Authority
(Bonita Springs Retirement Village, Inc.)
Series 2011A
8.125%, 11/15/46

     100        116,381   

Alachua County Health Facilities Authority
(East Ridge Retirement Village, Inc.)
Series 2014
6.25%, 11/15/44

     1,100        1,200,133   

Alachua County Health Facilities Authority
(Oak Hammock at the University of Florida)
Series 2012A
8.00%, 10/01/46

     435        515,775   

Capital Trust Agency, Inc.
(Million Air One LLC)
Series 2011
7.75%, 1/01/41

     2,770        2,836,009   

 

12     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Citizens Property Insurance Corp.
Series 2012A
5.00%, 6/01/22

   $ 6,725      $ 7,934,088   

City of Lakeland FL
(Florida Southern College)
Series 2012A
5.00%, 9/01/37-9/01/42

     2,350        2,449,030   

City of Tampa FL Solid Waste System Revenue
Series 2013
5.00%, 10/01/21

     3,000        3,497,730   

Collier County Industrial Development Authority
(Arlington of Naples (The))
Series 2014A
8.125%, 5/15/44(a)

     2,000        2,220,600   

Martin County Health Facilities Authority
(Martin Memorial Medical Center)
Series 2012 5.50%,
11/15/32-11/15/42

     1,950        2,155,822   

Martin County Industrial Development Authority
(Indiantown Cogeneration LP)
Series 2013
4.20%, 12/15/25

     1,150        1,170,677   

Miami Beach Health Facilities Authority
Series 2004
6.75%, 11/15/14 (Pre-refunded/ETM)

     155        155,282   

Miami Beach Health Facilities Authority
(Mount Sinai Medical Center of Florida, Inc.)
Series 2012
5.00%, 11/15/29

     2,885        3,282,870   

Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority
Series 2014A
5.00%, 7/01/34

     4,000        4,554,640   

Mid-Bay Bridge Authority
Series 2011A
7.25%, 10/01/40

     300        362,331   

Palm Beach County Health Facilities Authority
(Sinai Residences of Boca Raton Project)
Series 2014A
7.50%, 6/01/49

     200        227,544   

Palm Beach County Health Facilities Authority
(Waterford Retirement Communities)
Series 2007
5.875%, 11/15/37

     100        104,628   

Reedy Creek Improvement District
Series 2013A
5.00%, 6/01/24

     3,000        3,570,330   

Town of Davie FL
(Nova Southeastern University, Inc.)
Series 2013A
5.625%, 4/01/43

     3,765        4,175,272   

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       13   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Volusia County School Board COP
Series 2014B
5.00%, 8/01/31

   $ 1,625      $ 1,870,944   
    

 

 

 
       42,400,086   
    

 

 

 

Georgia – 0.8%

    

City of Atlanta Department of Aviation
(Hartsfield Jackson Atlanta Intl Airport)
Series 2012A
5.00%, 1/01/31

     1,390        1,604,533   

Series 2014A
5.00%, 1/01/33

     1,820        2,085,920   
    

 

 

 
       3,690,453   
    

 

 

 

Idaho – 0.5%

    

Idaho Health Facilities Authority
(The Terraces at Boise)
Series 2014A
8.00%, 10/01/44

     2,050        2,159,614   

Idaho Housing & Finance Association
(Battelle Energy Alliance LLC)
Series 2010A
7.00%, 2/01/36

     200        229,140   
    

 

 

 
       2,388,754   
    

 

 

 

Illinois – 7.2%

    

Chicago Board of Education
Series 2012A
5.00%, 12/01/42

     4,300        4,322,532   

Chicago Transit Authority
(City of Chicago IL Fed Hwy Grant)
AGC Series 2008
5.00%, 6/01/18

     1,170        1,276,037   

City of Chicago IL
(Goldblatts Supportive Living Project)
Series 2013
6.375%, 12/01/52(d)

     1,050        996,944   

Illinois Finance Authority
(Ascension Health Credit Group)
Series 2012A
5.00%, 11/15/42

     3,600        3,966,804   

Illinois Finance Authority
(Greenfields of Geneva)
Series 2010A
8.125%, 2/15/40

     3,000        3,186,960   

Illinois Finance Authority
(Illinois Institute of Technology)
Series 2006A
5.00%, 4/01/19-4/01/36

     465        467,552   

 

14     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Illinois Finance Authority
(Lake Forest College)
Series 2012A
6.00%, 10/01/48

   $ 400      $ 431,796   

Illinois Finance Authority
(Lutheran Home & Services Obligated Group)
Series 2012
5.75%, 5/15/46

     2,010        2,079,365   

Illinois Finance Authority
(Park Place of Elmhurst)
Series 2010A
8.00%, 5/15/20

     75        51,037   

8.125%, 5/15/40

     660        447,447   

8.25%, 5/15/45

     1,890        1,281,231   

Series 2010B
7.75%, 5/15/20

     305        207,549   

Series 2010D-3
6.25%, 8/15/15

     20        20,000   

Illinois Finance Authority
(Plymouth Place, Inc.)
Series 2013
6.00%, 5/15/43

     3,500        3,420,515   

Illinois Finance Authority
(UNO Charter School Network, Inc.)
Series 2011A
7.125%, 10/01/41

     100        116,666   

State of Illinois
Series 2012
5.00%, 8/01/21-8/01/23

     9,760        10,929,882   

Series 2014
5.00%, 5/01/35

     1,370        1,475,038   
    

 

 

 
       34,677,355   
    

 

 

 

Indiana – 2.2%

    

Indiana Finance Authority
(Bethany Circle of King’s Daughters’ of Madison Indiana, Inc. (The))
Series 2010
5.125%, 8/15/27

     1,000        1,088,650   

5.50%, 8/15/40-8/15/45

     3,020        3,234,240   

Indiana Finance Authority
(WVB East End Partners LLC)
Series 2013A
5.00%, 7/01/40-7/01/48

     5,900        6,240,933   
    

 

 

 
       10,563,823   
    

 

 

 

Iowa – 0.4%

    

Iowa Finance Authority
(Alcoa, Inc.)
Series 2012
4.75%, 8/01/42

     725        748,650   

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       15   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Iowa Tobacco Settlement Authority
Series 2005C
5.625%, 6/01/46

   $ 1,110      $ 942,623   
    

 

 

 
       1,691,273   
    

 

 

 
    

Kentucky – 1.2%

    

Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority
(Masonic Homes of Kentucky, Inc. Obligated Group)
Series 2012
5.375%, 11/15/42

     1,685        1,708,539   

5.50%, 11/15/45

     1,000        1,019,470   

Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority
(Owensboro Medical Health System, Inc.)
Series 2010A
6.00%, 6/01/30

     200        229,468   

6.375%, 6/01/40

     1,525        1,759,347   

6.50%, 3/01/45

     1,000        1,151,740   
    

 

 

 
       5,868,564   
    

 

 

 

Louisiana – 1.8%

    

Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No 2
Series 2011
6.375%, 7/01/41

     2,130        2,362,511   

Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities & Community Development Auth (Woman’s Hospital Foundation)
Series 2010A
6.00%, 10/01/44

     400        461,680   

Louisiana Public Facilities Authority
(Louisiana Pellets, Inc.)
Series 2013B
10.50%, 7/01/39

     2,750        2,990,267   

Series 2014A
7.50%, 7/01/23

     1,250        1,273,675   

Port New Orleans Board of Commissioners
Series 2013B
5.00%, 4/01/29-4/01/31

     1,540        1,686,727   
    

 

 

 
       8,774,860   
    

 

 

 

Maryland – 0.2%

    

City of Westminster MD
(Lutheran Village at Miller’s Grant)
Series 2014D
3.875%, 7/01/19

     1,125        1,153,159   
    

 

 

 

Massachusetts – 1.1%

    

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency (Merrimack College)
Series 2012A
5.25%, 7/01/42

     745        770,077   

 

16     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency (North Hill Communities, Inc. Obligated Group)
Series 2013B
4.50%, 11/15/18

   $ 4,500      $ 4,515,795   
    

 

 

 
       5,285,872   
    

 

 

 

Michigan – 6.8%

    

City of Detroit MI Sewage Disposal System Revenue
Series 2012A
5.00%, 7/01/32

     1,000        1,071,470   

5.25%, 7/01/39

     1,515        1,624,292   

City of Detroit MI Water Supply System Revenue
Series 2011C
5.00%, 7/01/41

     1,060        1,101,245   

Detroit City School District
Series 2012A
5.00%, 5/01/31

     120        130,285   

Michigan Finance Authority
Series 2014D4
5.00%, 7/01/29

     1,100        1,208,603   

Michigan Finance Authority
(City of Detroit MI Sewage Disposal System Revenue)
Series 2014C
5.00%, 7/01/17-7/01/18

     2,000        2,200,690   

Series 2014C-1
5.00%, 7/01/44

     1,750        1,841,927   

Michigan Finance Authority
(Detroit City School District)
Series 2014E
2.85%, 8/20/15

     3,700        3,723,791   

Michigan Finance Authority
(Public Lighting Authority)
Series 2014B
5.00%, 7/01/31-7/01/33

     7,950        8,592,527   

Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority (Henry Ford Health System Obligated Group)
Series 2006A
5.25%, 11/15/32-11/15/46

     300        313,660   

Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority (Presbyterian Villages of Michigan Obligated Group)
Series 2005
5.50%, 11/15/35

     1,750        1,726,375   

Michigan Strategic Fund
(Detroit Renewable Energy Obligated Group)
Series 2013
8.50%, 12/01/30(a)

     2,450        2,513,430   

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       17   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Michigan Strategic Fund
(Evangelical Homes of Michigan Obligated Group)
Series 2013
5.50%, 6/01/47

   $ 2,000      $ 2,050,920   

Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority Series 2007A
6.00%, 6/01/48

     5,775        4,652,340   
    

 

 

 
       32,751,555   
    

 

 

 

Missouri – 0.0%

    

Health & Educational Facilities Authority of the State of Missouri
(Lutheran Senior Services Obligated Group)
Series 2010
5.50%, 2/01/42

     100        108,545   
    

 

 

 

Nebraska – 0.7%

    

Central Plains Energy Project
(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The))

    

Series 2012
5.00%, 9/01/32-9/01/42

     2,975        3,238,961   
    

 

 

 

Nevada – 0.0%

    

City of Reno NV
(Renown Regional Medical Center, Inc.)
Series 2007A
5.25%, 6/01/41

     130        134,703   
    

 

 

 

New Hampshire – 0.6%

    

New Hampshire Health and Education Facilities Authority Act
(Southern New Hampshire University)
Series 2012
5.00%, 1/01/42

     2,940        3,056,248   
    

 

 

 

New Jersey – 5.4%

    

Gloucester County Pollution Control Financing Authority
(Logan Cogen Proj)
Series 2014A
5.00%, 12/01/24

     1,000        1,120,070   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority Series 2014U
5.00%, 6/15/21

     3,500        4,002,530   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority
(Lions Gate Project)
Series 2014
5.25%, 1/01/44

     3,600        3,678,480   

 

18     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

New Jersey Economic Development Authority
(UMM Energy Partners LLC)
Series 2012A
5.125%, 6/15/43

   $ 735      $ 772,022   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority
(United Airlines, Inc.)
Series 1999
5.25%, 9/15/29

     2,850        3,028,438   

Series 2000B
5.625%, 11/15/30

     2,075        2,264,863   

New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority
(Holy Name Medical Center, Inc.)
Series 2010
5.00%, 7/01/25

     100        108,594   

New Jersey State Turnpike Authority
Series 2013A
5.00%, 1/01/27-1/01/32

     3,500        4,044,210   

Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp./NJ
Series 20071A
5.00%, 6/01/41

     9,650        7,187,320   
    

 

 

 
       26,206,527   
    

 

 

 

New Mexico – 0.2%

    

New Mexico Hospital Equipment Loan Council
(Gerald Champion Regional Medical Center)
Series 2012
5.50%, 7/01/42

     1,060        1,003,820   
    

 

 

 

New York – 9.2%

    

Build NYC Resource Corp.
(South Bronx Charter School for International Cultures & The Arts)
Series 2013A
5.00%, 4/15/43

     1,900        1,863,197   

City of Newburgh NY
Series 2012A
5.625%, 6/15/34

     245        261,283   

Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Series 2013B
5.00%, 11/15/27

     5,125        6,027,820   

Series 2013E
5.00%, 11/15/32

     4,425        5,086,360   

Metropolitan Trnsp Auth NY
(Metro Trnsp Auth NY Ded Tax)
Series 2004B-2
5.00%, 11/15/31(b)

     190        220,571   

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       19   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Nassau County Industrial Development Agency
(Amsterdam House Continuing Care Retirement Community, Inc.)
Series 2007A
6.50%, 1/01/27(d)(e)

   $ 100      $ 76,000   

Series 2007C
10.00%, 1/01/28(d)(e)(f)

     1,815        1,379,400   

Nassau County Local Economic Assistance Corp.
(Winthrop University Hospital)
Series 2012
5.00%, 7/01/37

     300        324,327   

New York City Industrial Development Agency
(American Airlines, Inc.)
Series 2005
7.75%, 8/01/31

     100        109,768   

New York Liberty Development Corp.
(3 World Trade Center LLC)
Series 2014
5.00%, 11/15/44(a)(c)

     2,900        2,915,863   

5.375%, 11/15/40(a)(c)

     1,110        1,133,710   

New York Liberty Development Corp.
(7 World Trade Center II LLC)
Series 2012
5.00%, 3/15/44

     100        106,646   

New York Liberty Development Corp.
(Goldman Sachs Headquarters LLC)
Series 2005
5.25%, 10/01/35

     1,325        1,570,615   

New York NY
Series 2013A-1
5.00%, 10/01/28(b)

     500        583,685   

New York State Thruway Authority
(New York State Thruway Authority Gen Toll Road)
Series 2012I
5.00%, 1/01/37

     2,000        2,229,880   

Orange County Funding Corp.
(The Hamlet at Wallkill)
Series 2013

    

6.50%, 1/01/46

     1,125        1,124,876   

Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
Series 2012
5.00%, 10/01/34

     3,900        4,375,878   

Series 20131
5.00%, 12/01/33

     5,000        5,665,800   

Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority
Series 2012B
5.00%, 11/15/28(b)

     700        821,562   

 

20     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Triborough NY Bridge Tunnel Authority
Series 2012B
5.00%, 11/15/29(b)

   $ 1,250      $ 1,462,137   

Ulster County Capital Resource Corp.
(Kingston Regional Senior Living Corp.)
Series 2014A
7.50%, 9/15/44(a)(g)

     360        253,019   

Series 2014B
7.00%, 9/15/44(a)

     410        411,685   

Ulster County Industrial Development Agency
(Kingston Regional Senior Living Corp.)
Series 2007A
5.25%, 9/15/16

     35        34,307   

6.00%, 9/15/27-9/15/37

     2,225        2,057,881   

Westchester County Local Development Corp.
(Kendal on Hudson)
Series 2013
5.00%, 1/01/34

     3,840        4,107,533   
    

 

 

 
       44,203,803   
    

 

 

 

North Carolina – 0.4%

    

North Carolina Medical Care Commission
(Duke University Health System, Inc.)
Series 2012A
5.00%, 6/01/42

     1,555        1,748,535   

North Carolina Medical Care Commission
(Pennybyrn at Maryfield)
Series 2005A
6.00%, 10/01/23

     275        278,339   

6.125%, 10/01/35

     100        100,688   
    

 

 

 
       2,127,562   
    

 

 

 

Ohio – 4.5%

    

Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority
Series 2007A-2
5.875%, 6/01/47

     8,775        6,932,162   

County of Erie OH
(Firelands Regional Medical Center)
Series 2006A
5.25%, 8/15/46

     1,115        1,134,201   

County of Franklin OH
(First Community Village Obligated Group)
Series 2013
5.625%, 7/01/47

     2,300        2,094,702   

County of Hamilton OH
(Life Enriching Communities Obligated Group)
Series 2012
5.00%, 1/01/42

     1,030        1,066,905   

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       21   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

County of Muskingum OH
(Genesis Health System Obligated Group)
Series 2013
5.00%, 2/15/44-2/15/48

   $ 4,100      $ 4,148,076   

Ohio State Water Development Authority
(FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation LLC)
Series 2008C
3.95%, 11/01/32

     5,000        5,241,300   

Pinnacle Community Infrastructure Financing Authority
Series 2004A
6.25%, 12/01/36

     1,000        1,006,310   
    

 

 

 
       21,623,656   
    

 

 

 

Oklahoma – 0.3%

    

Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust
(American Airlines, Inc.)
Series 2013A
5.50%, 6/01/35

     1,300        1,366,079   
    

 

 

 

Oregon – 0.1%

    

Hospital Facilities Authority of Multnomah County Oregon
(Mirabella at South Waterfront)
Series 2014A
5.00%, 10/01/19

     650        696,605   
    

 

 

 

Pennsylvania – 4.1%

    

Allegheny County Higher Education Building Authority
(Chatham University)
Series 2012A
5.00%, 9/01/35

     230        246,102   

Bensalem Township School District
Series 2013
5.00%, 6/01/29

     8,570        10,063,580   

City of Philadelphia PA
Series 2013A
5.00%, 7/15/21

     1,200        1,422,000   

Cumberland County Municipal Authority
(Asbury Pennsylvania Obligated Group)
Series 2010
6.125%, 1/01/45

     180        193,828   

Series 2012
5.25%, 1/01/41

     1,000        1,017,220   

Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority/PA
(Philadelphia Presbytery Homes, Inc.)
Series 2010
6.50%, 12/01/25

     200        233,748   

 

22     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Norristown Area School District COP
Series 2012
5.00%, 4/01/32

   $ 100      $ 105,303   

Northeastern Pennsylvania Hospital & Education Authority
(Wilkes University)
Series 2012A
5.25%, 3/01/42

     265        282,540   

Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority
(National Railroad Passenger Corp (The))
Series 2012A
5.00%, 11/01/41

     1,620        1,733,270   

Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
Series 2013A
5.00%, 12/01/43

     4,000        4,336,680   
    

 

 

 
       19,634,271   
    

 

 

 

Puerto Rico – 0.6%

    

Puerto Rico Industrial Tourist Educational Medical & Envirml Ctl Facs Fing Auth
(AES Puerto Rico LP)
Series 2000
6.625%, 6/01/26

     2,495        2,374,067   

Puerto Rico Industrial Tourist Educational Medical & Envirml Ctl Facs Fing Auth
(Sistema Universitario Ana G Mendez Incorporado)
Series 2012
5.375%, 4/01/42

     335        275,293   
    

 

 

 
       2,649,360   
    

 

 

 

Rhode Island – 0.8%

    

Rhode Island Health & Educational Building Corp.
(Tockwotton Home)
Series 2011
8.375%, 1/01/46

     3,150        3,618,909   
    

 

 

 

South Carolina – 0.5%

    

South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority
(Lutheran Homes of South Carolina Obligated Group)
Series 2013
5.00%, 5/01/43

     1,000        1,009,640   

5.125%, 5/01/48

     1,000        1,009,930   

South Carolina St Public Svc Auth
AMBAC Series 2007A
5.00%, 1/01/32(b)

     400        426,672   
    

 

 

 
       2,446,242   
    

 

 

 

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       23   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Tennessee – 1.5%

    

Johnson City Health & Educational Facilities Board
(Mountain States Health Alliance Obligated Group)
Series 2012
5.00%, 8/15/42

   $ 4,890      $ 5,267,997   

Shelby County Health Educational & Housing Facilities Board
(Village at Germantown, Inc.(The))
Series 2012
5.25%, 12/01/42

     1,000        1,023,730   

5.375%, 12/01/47

     800        822,904   
    

 

 

 
       7,114,631   
    

 

 

 

Texas – 6.3%

    

Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority
Series 2011
6.00%, 1/01/41

     120        137,263   

Series 2013
5.00%, 1/01/42

     3,500        3,711,330   

City of Houston TX Airport System Revenue
(United Airlines, Inc.)
Series 2014
5.00%, 7/01/29

     3,155        3,350,894   

Clifton Higher Education Finance Corp.
(IDEA Public Schools)
Series 2012
5.00%, 8/15/42

     530        568,393   

Series 2013
6.00%, 8/15/43

     1,000        1,179,190   

Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport
Series 2012E
5.00%, 11/01/35

     1,500        1,636,695   

Houston TX Util Sys
Series 2011D
5.00%, 11/15/28(b)

     400        461,852   

North Texas Education Finance Corp.
(Uplift Education)
Series 2012A
5.125%, 12/01/42

     280        301,154   

Red River Health Facilities Development Corp.
(MRC Crestview)
Series 2011A
8.00%, 11/15/46

     1,790        2,122,367   

Red River Health Facilities Development Corp.
(MRC Crossings Proj)
Series 2014A
7.75%, 11/15/44

     1,315        1,496,075   

 

24     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Red River Health Facilities Development Corp.
(Wichita Falls Retirement Foundation)
Series 2012
5.50%, 1/01/32

   $ 1,040      $ 1,096,451   

Sanger Industrial Development Corp.
(Texas Pellets, Inc.)
Series 2012B
8.00%, 7/01/38

     2,200        2,434,674   

Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp.
(Buckingham Senior Living Community, Inc.)
Series 2007
5.50%, 11/15/22

     200        208,414   

Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp.
(Stayton at Museum Way)
Series 2009A
8.25%, 11/15/44

     1,000        971,640   

Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp. I
(Bank of America Corp.)
Series 2008D
6.25%, 12/15/26

     1,000        1,233,810   

Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp.
(LBJ Infrastructure Group LLC)
Series 2010
7.00%, 6/30/40

     660        790,977   

Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp.
(NTE Mobility Partners LLC)
Series 2009
6.875%, 12/31/39

     200        235,602   

Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp.
(NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 LLC)
Series 2013
6.75%, 6/30/43

     3,600        4,338,504   

Travis County Health Facilities Development Corp.
(Longhorn Village)
Series 2012A
7.00%, 1/01/32

     1,200        1,320,384   

7.125%, 1/01/46

     2,430        2,649,478   

Viridian Municipal Management District
Series 2011
9.00%, 12/01/37

     75        88,781   
    

 

 

 
       30,333,928   
    

 

 

 

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       25   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Utah – 0.1%

    

Timber Lakes Water Special Service District
Series 2011
8.125%, 6/15/31

   $ 95      $ 104,355   

Utah State Charter School Finance Authority
Series 2010
8.25%, 7/15/18 (Pre-refunded/ETM)

     100        128,411   

Utah State Charter School Finance Authority
(Early Light Academy, Inc.)
Series 2010
8.50%, 7/15/46

     100        112,933   

Utah State Charter School Finance Authority
(North Star Academy)
Series 2010A
7.00%, 7/15/45

     100        112,107   
    

 

 

 
       457,806   
    

 

 

 

Vermont – 0.0%

    

Vermont Economic Development Authority
(Wake Robin Corp.)
Series 2012
5.40%, 5/01/33

     200        204,820   
    

 

 

 

Virginia – 3.1%

    

Chesterfield County Economic Development Authority
(Brandermill Woods)
Series 2012
5.125%, 1/01/43

     1,030        1,048,128   

City of Chesapeake VA Chesapeake Expressway Toll Road Revenue
Series 2012A
5.00%, 7/15/47

     300        318,255   

Fairfax County Economic Development Authority
(Vinson Hall LLC)
Series 2013A
5.00%, 12/01/47

     1,955        1,990,620   

Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp./VA
Series 2007B1
5.00%, 6/01/47

     10,065        6,853,762   

Virginia College Bldg Auth Virginia Lease 21st Century College Prog
Series 2013A
5.00%, 2/01/28(b)

     550        649,094   

Virginia Small Business Financing Authority
(Elizabeth River Crossings OpCo LLC)
Series 2012
5.50%, 1/01/42

     3,580        3,925,971   
    

 

 

 
       14,785,830   
    

 

 

 

 

26     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Washington – 3.0%

    

Washington Health Care Facilities Authority
(Multicare Health System Obligated Group)
Series 2012A
5.00%, 8/15/44

   $ 1,000      $ 1,097,030   

Washington Health Care Facilities Authority
(Providence Health & Services Obligated Group)
Series 2012A
5.00%, 10/01/42

     3,350        3,699,170   

Washington St GO
Series 2011C
5.00%, 7/01/24(b)

     1,000        1,178,380   

Washington State Housing Finance Commission
(Mirabella)
Series 2012A
6.75%, 10/01/47

     2,650        2,826,676   

Washington State Housing Finance Commission
(Rockwood Retirement Communities)
Series 2014A
7.375%, 1/01/44(a)

     3,215        3,515,474   

Washington State Housing Finance Commission
(Skyline at First Hill Proj)
Series 2007A
5.625%, 1/01/27-1/01/38

     2,265        2,187,173   
    

 

 

 
       14,503,903   
    

 

 

 

West Virginia – 0.5%

    

West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority
(West Virginia United Health System, Inc.)
Series 2013A
5.50%, 6/01/44

     2,100        2,393,643   
    

 

 

 

Wisconsin – 1.2%

    

Public Finance Authority
(Rose Villa)
Series 2014A
5.75%, 11/15/44

     1,000        1,021,370   

University of Wisconsin Hospitals & Clinics Authority
Series 2013A
5.00%, 4/01/38

     4,155        4,627,714   
    

 

 

 
       5,649,084   
    

 

 

 

Total Long-Term Municipal Bonds
(cost $421,399,423)

       444,950,035   
    

 

 

 

Short-Term Municipal Notes – 5.1%

    

Alaska – 0.8%

    

City of Valdez AK
(Exxon Mobil Corp.)
Series 1993A
0.08%, 12/01/33(h)

     3,600        3,600,000   
    

 

 

 

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       27   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Mississippi – 2.7%

    

Mississippi Business Finance Corp.
(Chevron USA, Inc.)
Series 2010H
0.08%, 11/01/35(h)

   $ 8,000      $ 8,000,000   

Series 2011G
0.08%, 11/01/35(h)

     5,100        5,100,000   
    

 

 

 
       13,100,000   
    

 

 

 

Wyoming – 1.6%

    

County of Sublette WY
(Exxon Mobil Corp.)
Series 1984
0.03%, 11/01/14(h)

     7,800        7,800,000   
    

 

 

 

Total Short-Term Municipal Notes
(cost $24,500,000)

       24,500,000   
    

 

 

 

Total Municipal Obligations
(cost $445,899,423)

       469,450,035   
    

 

 

 
     Shares        

SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS – 2.7%

    

Investment Companies – 2.7%

    

AllianceBernstein Fixed-Income Shares, Inc.—Government STIF Portfolio, 0.07%(i) (j)
(cost $13,090,639)

     13,090,639        13,090,639   
    

 

 

 

Total Investments – 100.3%
(cost $458,990,062)

       482,540,674   

Other assets less liabilities – (0.3)%

       (1,224,333
    

 

 

 

Net Assets – 100.0%

     $ 481,316,341   
    

 

 

 

CENTRALLY CLEARED CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS (see Note C)

 

Clearing Broker/(Exchange) &
Referenced Obligation
  Fixed
Rate
(Pay)
Receive
    Implied
Credit
Spread at
October 31,
2014
    Notional
Amount
(000)
    Market
Value
    Unrealized
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
 

Sale Contracts

         

Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC/(INTRCONX):

         

CDX-NAHY Series 22,
5 Year Index, 06/20/19*

    5.00     3.15   $ 99      $ 7,999      $ 2,215   

Citigroup Global Markets, Inc./(INTRCONX):

         

CDX-NAHY Series 23,
5 Year Index, 12/20/19*

    5.00     3.39     5,000        381,238        180,666   
       

 

 

   

 

 

 
        $     389,237      $     182,881   
       

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

28     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


 

(a)   Security is exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities are considered liquid and may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At October 31, 2014, the aggregate market value of these securities amounted to $26,589,136 or 5.5% of net assets.

 

(b)   Security represents the underlying municipal obligation of an inverse floating rate obligation held by the Fund (see Note G).

 

(c)   When-Issued or delayed delivery security.

 

(d)   Illiquid security.

 

(e)   Security is in default and is non-income producing.

 

(f)   Variable rate coupon, rate shown as of October 31, 2014.

 

(g)   Indicates a security that has a zero coupon that remains in effect until a predetermined date at which time the stated coupon rate becomes effective until final maturity.

 

(h)   Variable Rate Demand Notes are instruments whose interest rates change on a specific date (such as coupon date or interest payment date) or whose interest rates vary with changes in a designated base rate (such as the prime interest rate). This instrument is payable on demand and is secured by letters of credit or other credit support agreements from major banks.

 

(i)   To obtain a copy of the fund’s financial statements, please go to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov, or call AllianceBernstein at (800) 227-4618.

 

(j)   Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. The rate shown represents the 7-day yield as of period end.

As of October 31, 2014, the Fund’s percentages of investments in municipal bonds that are insured and in insured municipal bonds that have been pre-refunded or escrowed to maturity are 0.7% and 0.00%, respectively.

Glossary:

AGC Assured Guaranty Corporation

AMBAC Ambac Assurance Corporation

CDX-NAHY North American High Yield Credit Default Swap Index

COP Certificate of Participation

ETM Escrowed to Maturity

FGIC Financial Guaranty Insurance Company

GO General Obligation

INTRCONX Inter-Continental Exchange

XLCA XL Capital Assurance Inc.

 

See notes to financial statements.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       29   

Portfolio of Investments


STATEMENT OF ASSETS & LIABILITIES

October 31, 2014 (unaudited)

 

Assets   

Investments in securities, at value

  

Unaffiliated issuers (cost $445,899,423)

   $ 469,450,035   

Affiliated issuers (cost $13,090,639)

     13,090,639   

Due from broker

     275,780 (a) 

Interest and dividend receivable

     7,550,253   

Receivable for shares of beneficial interest sold

     5,855,991   

Receivable for variation margin on exchange-traded derivatives

     27,204   
  

 

 

 

Total assets

     496,249,902   
  

 

 

 
Liabilities   

Due to custodian

     1,541   

Payable for investment securities purchased

     6,978,006   

Payable for floating rate notes issued*

     5,545,000   

Dividends payable

     1,947,821   

Payable for shares of beneficial interest redeemed

     443,800   

Interest payable

     17,393   
  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     14,933,561   
  

 

 

 

Net Assets

   $ 481,316,341   
  

 

 

 
Composition of Net Assets   

Shares of beneficial interest, at par

   $ 435   

Additional paid-in capital

     467,024,137   

Undistributed net investment income

     140,166   

Accumulated net realized loss on investment transactions

     (9,581,890

Net unrealized appreciation on investments

     23,733,493   
  

 

 

 
   $     481,316,341   
  

 

 

 

Net Asset Value Per Share—unlimited shares of beneficial interest authorized, $.00001 par value (based on 43,478,218 common shares outstanding)

   $ 11.07   
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)   Represents amounts on deposit at the broker as collateral for open derivative contracts.

 

*   Represents short-term floating rate certificates issued by tender option bond trusts (see Note G).

See notes to financial statements.

 

30     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Statement of Assets & Liabilities


STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Six Months Ended October 31, 2014 (unaudited)

 

Investment Income      

Interest

   $     10,719,717      

Dividends—Affiliated issuers

     4,060       $     10,723,777   
  

 

 

    
Expenses      

Interest expense

     157,283      
  

 

 

    

Total expenses

        157,283   
     

 

 

 

Net investment income

        10,566,494   
     

 

 

 
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investment Transactions      

Net realized gain (loss) on:

     

Investment transactions

        (3,310,729

Swaps

        103,103   

Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of:

     

Investments

        19,900,809   

Swaps

        182,881   
     

 

 

 

Net gain on investment transactions

        16,876,064   
     

 

 

 

Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations

      $ 27,442,558   
     

 

 

 

 

See notes to financial statements.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       31   

Statement of Operations


STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

 

     Six Months Ended
October 31, 2014
(unaudited)
    Year Ended
April 30,

2014
 
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from Operations     

Net investment income

   $ 10,566,494      $ 13,727,989   

Net realized loss on investment transactions

     (3,207,626     (6,110,946

Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments

     20,083,690        (459,693
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase in net assets from operations

     27,442,558        7,157,350   
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders from     

Net investment income

     (10,585,074     (13,753,373

Net realized gain on investment transactions

     – 0  –      (28,460
Transactions in Shares of Beneficial Interest     

Net increase

     82,791,267        183,034,284   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total increase

     99,648,751        176,409,801   
Net Assets     

Beginning of period

     381,667,590        205,257,789   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of period (including undistributed net investment income of $140,166 and $158,746, respectively)

   $     481,316,341      $     381,667,590   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

See notes to financial statements.

 

32     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Statement of Changes in Net Assets


STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

For the Six Months Ended October 31, 2014 (unaudited)

 

Net increase in net assets from operations

     $ 27,442,558   
    

 

 

 
Reconciliation of Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations to Net Decrease in Cash from Operating Activities:     

Increase in interest and dividends receivable

   $ (905,295  

Decrease in receivable for investments sold

     5,144     

Net accretion of bond discount and amortization of bond premium

     539,047     

Increase in payable for investments purchased

     5,619,037     

Increase in accrued expenses

     6,811     

Decrease in due from broker

     (275,780  

Purchases of long-term investments

     (87,657,968  

Purchases of short-term investments

         (134,179,139  

Proceeds from disposition of long-term investments

     31,574,464     

Proceeds from disposition of short-term investments

     105,031,082     

Payments for exchange-traded derivatives settlements

     (83,736  

Variation margin received on exchange-traded derivatives

     (27,204  

Decrease in cash collateral received from broker

     (390,000  

Net realized gain on investment

     3,207,626     

Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments

     (20,083,690  
  

 

 

   

Total adjustments

           (97,619,601
    

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash from operating activities

     $ (70,177,043
    

 

 

 
Financing Activities:     

Subscriptions of capital stock, net

     80,441,871     

Decrease in due to custodian

     (9,093  

Cash dividends paid (net of dividend reinvestments)

     (10,255,735  

Net increase in cash from financing activities

       70,177,043   
    

 

 

 

Net increase in cash

         

Net change in cash

    

Cash at beginning of period

         
    

 

 

 

Cash at end of period

     $   
    

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

    

Interest expense paid during the period

     150,472     
  

 

 

   

 

*   In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Portfolio has included a Statement of Cash Flows as a result of its significant investments in Level 3 securities throughout the period.

See notes to financial statements.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       33   

Statement of Cash Flows


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

October 31, 2014 (unaudited)

 

NOTE A

Significant Accounting Policies

AllianceBernstein Corporate Shares (the “Trust”) was organized as a Massachusetts business trust under the laws of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts by an Agreement and Declaration of Trust (“Declaration of Trust”) dated January 26, 2004. The Trust is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as an open-end, diversified management investment company. The Trust operates as a “series” company currently offering three separate portfolios: AllianceBernstein Corporate Income Shares, AllianceBernstein Municipal Income Shares (the “Portfolio”) and AllianceBernstein Taxable Multi-Sector Income Shares. Each Portfolio is considered to be a separate entity for financial reporting and tax purposes. This report relates only to AllianceBernstein Municipal Income Shares.

Shares of the Portfolio are offered exclusively to holders of accounts established under wrap-fee programs sponsored and maintained by certain registered investment advisers approved by AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”). The Portfolio’s shares may be purchased at the relevant net asset value without a sales charge or other fee. The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) which require management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Portfolio.

1. Security Valuation

Portfolio securities are valued at their current market value determined on the basis of market quotations or, if market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable, at “fair value” as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”).

In general, the market values of securities which are readily available and deemed reliable are determined as follows: securities listed on a national securities exchange (other than securities listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. (“NASDAQ”)) or on a foreign securities exchange are valued at the last sale price at the close of the exchange or foreign securities exchange. If there has been no sale on such day, the securities are valued at the last traded price from the previous day. Securities listed on more than one exchange are valued by reference to the principal exchange on which the securities are traded; securities listed only on NASDAQ are valued in accordance with the NASDAQ Official Closing Price; listed or over the counter (“OTC”) market put or call options are valued at the mid level between the current bid and ask prices. If either a current bid or current ask price is unavailable, the Adviser will have discretion to determine the best valuation (e.g. last trade price in the case of listed options);

 

34     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

open futures are valued using the closing settlement price or, in the absence of such a price, the most recent quoted bid price. If there are no quotations available for the day of valuation, the last available closing settlement price is used; U.S. government securities and other debt instruments having 60 days or less remaining until maturity are valued at amortized cost if their original maturity was 60 days or less. If the original term to maturity exceeded 60 days, the securities are valued by a pricing service, if a market price is available. If a market price is not available, the securities are valued by using amortized cost as of the 61st day prior to maturity. Fixed-income securities, including mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, may be valued on the basis of prices provided by a pricing service or at a price obtained from one or more of the major broker-dealers. In cases where broker-dealer quotes are obtained, the Adviser may establish procedures whereby changes in market yields or spreads are used to adjust, on a daily basis, a recently obtained quoted price on a security. Swaps and other derivatives are valued daily, primarily using independent pricing services, independent pricing models using market inputs, as well as third party broker-dealers or counterparties. Investment companies are valued at their net asset value each day.

Securities for which market quotations are not readily available (including restricted securities) or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value. Factors considered in making this determination may include, but are not limited to, information obtained by contacting the issuer, analysts, analysis of the issuer’s financial statements or other available documents. In addition, the Portfolio may use fair value pricing for securities primarily traded in non-U.S. markets because most foreign markets close well before the Portfolio values its securities at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time. The earlier close of these foreign markets gives rise to the possibility that significant events, including broad market moves, may have occurred in the interim and may materially affect the value of those securities.

2. Fair Value Measurements

In accordance with U.S. GAAP regarding fair value measurements, fair value is defined as the price that the Portfolio would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. U.S. GAAP establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability (including those valued based on their market values as described in Note A.1 above). Inputs may be observable or unobservable and refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Portfolio. Unobservable inputs reflect the Portfolio’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances. Each investment is assigned a

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       35   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

level based upon the observability of the inputs which are significant to the overall valuation. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized below.

 

   

Level  1—quoted prices in active markets for identical investments

   

Level  2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)

   

Level  3—significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolio’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

The fair value of debt instruments, such as bonds, and over-the-counter derivatives is generally based on market price quotations, recently executed market transactions (where observable) or industry recognized modeling techniques and are generally classified as Level 2. Pricing vendor inputs to Level 2 valuations may include quoted prices for similar investments in active markets, interest rate curves, coupon rates, currency rates, yield curves, option adjusted spreads, default rates, credit spreads and other unique security features in order to estimate the relevant cash flows which are then discounted to calculate fair values. If these inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value, these investments will be classified as Level 3. In addition, non-agency rated investments are classified as Level 3.

Options and warrants are valued using market-based inputs to models, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency, where such inputs and models are available. Alternatively the values may be obtained through unobservable management determined inputs and/or management’s proprietary models. Where models are used, the selection of a particular model to value an option or a warrant depends upon the contractual terms of, and specific risks inherent in, the option or warrant as well as the availability of pricing information in the market. Valuation models require a variety of inputs, including contractual terms, market prices, measures of volatility and correlations of such inputs. Exchange traded options generally will be classified as Level 2. For options or warrants that do not trade on exchange but trade in liquid markets, inputs can generally be verified and model selection does not involve significant management judgment. Options and warrants are classified within Level 2 on the fair value hierarchy when all of the significant inputs can be corroborated to market evidence. Otherwise such instruments are classified as Level 3.

Other fixed income investments, including non-U.S. government and corporate debt, are generally valued using quoted market prices, if available, which are typically impacted by current interest rates, maturity dates and any perceived credit risk of the issuer. Additionally, in the absence of quoted market prices, these inputs are used by pricing vendors to derive a valuation based upon industry or proprietary models which incorporate issuer specific data with relevant yield/spread comparisons with more widely quoted bonds with similar key characteristics. Those investments for which there are observable inputs are classified as Level 2. Where the inputs are not observable, the investments are classified as Level 3.

 

36     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

The following table summarizes the valuation of the Portfolio’s investments by the above fair value hierarchy levels as of October 31, 2014:

 

Investments in

Securities:

   Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  

Assets:

  

Long-Term Municipal Bonds:

      

Alaska

   $ – 0  –    $ – 0  –    $ 110,409      $ 110,409   

Arizona

     – 0  –      3,589,167        1,694,973        5,284,140   

California

     – 0  –      29,648,659        8,378,969        38,027,628   

Colorado

     – 0  –      13,548,437        2,568,580        16,117,017   

Florida

     – 0  –      39,319,786        3,080,300        42,400,086   

Idaho

     – 0  –      229,140        2,159,614        2,388,754   

Illinois

     – 0  –      22,986,307        11,691,048        34,677,355   

Kentucky

     – 0  –      3,140,555        2,728,009        5,868,564   

Louisiana

     – 0  –      4,510,918        4,263,942        8,774,860   

Maryland

     – 0  –      – 0  –      1,153,159        1,153,159   

Massachusetts

     – 0  –      770,077        4,515,795        5,285,872   

Michigan

     – 0  –      30,238,125        2,513,430        32,751,555   

New Jersey

     – 0  –      22,528,047        3,678,480        26,206,527   

New York

     – 0  –      34,707,295        9,496,508        44,203,803   

North Carolina

     – 0  –      1,748,535        379,027        2,127,562   

Ohio

     – 0  –      18,522,643        3,101,013        21,623,656   

Oklahoma

     – 0  –      – 0  –      1,366,079        1,366,079   

Oregon

     – 0  –      – 0  –      696,605        696,605   

Pennsylvania

     – 0  –      18,423,224        1,211,047        19,634,271   

Rhode Island

     – 0  –      – 0  –      3,618,909        3,618,909   

South Carolina

     – 0  –      426,672        2,019,570        2,446,242   

Tennessee

     – 0  –      5,267,997        1,846,634        7,114,631   

Texas

     – 0  –      19,042,116        11,291,812        30,333,928   

Utah

     – 0  –      112,107        345,699        457,806   

Vermont

     – 0  –      – 0  –      204,820        204,820   

Virginia

     – 0  –      11,747,081        3,038,749        14,785,830   

Washington

     – 0  –      5,974,581        8,529,322        14,503,903   

Wisconsin

     – 0  –      4,627,714        1,021,370        5,649,084   

Other

     – 0  –      57,136,980        – 0  –      57,136,980   

Short-Term Municipal Notes

     – 0  –      24,500,000        – 0  –      24,500,000   

Short-Term Investments

     13,090,639        – 0  –      – 0  –      13,090,639   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Investments in Securities

     13,090,639        372,746,163        96,703,872        482,540,674   

Other Financial Instruments*:

        

Assets:

        

Centrally Cleared Credit Default Swaps

     – 0  –      182,881        – 0  –      182,881 # 

Liabilities

     – 0  –      – 0  –      – 0  –      – 0  – 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total+

   $   13,090,639      $   372,929,044      $   96,703,872      $   482,723,555   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*   Other financial instruments are derivative instruments, such as futures, forwards and swaps, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation/depreciation on the instrument.

 

+   There were no transfers between any levels during the reporting period.

 

#   Only variation margin receivable/payable at period end is reported within the statement of assets and liabilities. This amount reflects cumulative appreciation/(depreciation) of exchange-traded derivatives as reported in the portfolio of investments.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       37   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

The following is a reconciliation of investments in which significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were used in determining fair value.

 

    Long-Term
Municipal
Bonds
    Total  

Balance as of 4/30/14

  $ 77,665,952      $ 77,665,952   

Accrued discounts/(premiums)

    (4,100     (4,100

Realized gain (loss)

    103,392        103,392   

Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation

    5,026,930        5,026,930   

Purchases

    15,904,438        15,904,438   

Sales

    (1,992,740     (1,992,740

Transfers in to Level 3

    – 0  –      – 0  – 

Transfers out of Level 3

    – 0  –      – 0  – 
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of 10/31/14

  $     96,703,872      $     96,703,872   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation from Investments held as of 10/31/14*

  $ 5,026,869      $ 5,026,869   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*   The unrealized appreciation/depreciation is included in net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments in the accompanying statement of operations.

The Adviser has established a Valuation Committee (the “Committee”) which is responsible for overseeing the pricing and valuation of all securities held in the Portfolio. The Committee operates under pricing and valuation policies and procedures established by the Adviser and approved by the Board, including pricing policies which set forth the mechanisms and processes to be employed on a daily basis to implement these policies and procedures. In particular, the pricing policies describe how to determine market quotations for securities and other instruments. The Committee’s responsibilities include: 1) fair value and liquidity determinations (and oversight of any third parties to whom any responsibility for fair value and liquidity determinations is delegated), and 2) regular monitoring of the Adviser’s pricing and valuation policies and procedures and modification or enhancement of these policies and procedures (or recommendation of the modification of these policies and procedures) as the Committee believes appropriate.

The Committee is also responsible for monitoring the implementation of the pricing policies by the Adviser’s Pricing Group (the “Pricing Group”) and a third party which performs certain pricing functions in accordance with the pricing policies. The Pricing Group is responsible for the oversight of the third party on a day-to-day basis. The Committee and the Pricing Group perform a series of activities to provide reasonable assurance of the accuracy of prices including: 1) periodic vendor due diligence meetings, review of methodologies, new developments and processes at vendors, 2) daily comparison of security valuation versus prior day for all securities that exceeded established thresholds, and 3) daily review of unpriced, stale, and variance reports with exceptions reviewed by senior management and the Committee.

 

38     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

In addition, several processes outside of the pricing process are used to monitor valuation issues including: 1) performance and performance attribution reports are monitored for anomalous impacts based upon benchmark performance, and 2) portfolio managers review all portfolios for performance and analytics (which are generated using the Adviser’s prices).

3. Taxes

It is the Portfolio’s policy to meet the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute all of its investment company taxable income and net realized gains, if any, to shareholders. Therefore, no provisions for federal income or excise taxes are required.

In accordance with U.S. GAAP requirements regarding accounting for uncertainties in income taxes, management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken or expected to be taken on federal and state income tax returns for all open tax years (all years since inception of the Portfolio’s) and has concluded that no provision for income tax is required in the Portfolio’s financial statements.

4. Investment Income and Investment Transactions

Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date or as soon as the Portfolio is informed of the dividend. Interest income is accrued daily. Investment transactions are accounted for on the date the securities are purchased or sold. Investment gains or losses are determined on the identified cost basis. The Portfolio amortizes premiums and accretes discounts as adjustments to interest income.

5. Dividends and Distributions

Dividends and distributions to shareholders, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income dividends and capital gains distributions are determined in accordance with federal tax regulations and may differ from those determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. To the extent these differences are permanent, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts based on their federal tax basis treatment; temporary differences do not require such reclassification.

NOTE B

Advisory Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates

Under the terms of the Advisory Agreement, the Portfolio pays no advisory fee to the Adviser and the Adviser reimburses or pays for the Portfolio’s operating expenses. The Portfolio is an integral part of separately managed accounts in wrap-fee programs and other investment programs. Typically, participants in these programs pay a fee to their investment adviser for all costs and expenses of a separately managed account, including costs and expenses associated with the Portfolio, and a fee paid by their investment adviser to the Adviser. The Adviser serves as investment manager and adviser of the Portfolio and continuously furnishes an investment program for the Portfolio and manages, supervises and conducts the affairs of the Portfolio, subject to the supervisions of the Portfolio’s

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       39   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

Board. The Advisory Agreement provides that the Adviser or an affiliate will furnish, or pay the expenses of the Portfolio for, office space, facilities and equipment, services of executive and other personnel of the Portfolio and certain administrative services.

The Portfolio has entered into a Distribution Agreement with AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc., the Portfolio’s principal underwriter (the “Underwriter”), to permit the Underwriter to distribute the Portfolio’s shares, which are sold at their net asset value without any sales charge. The Portfolio does not pay a fee for this service. The Underwriter is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Adviser.

AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc. (“ABIS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Adviser, acts as the Portfolio’s registrar, transfer agent and dividend-disbursing agent. ABIS registers the transfer, issuance and redemption of Portfolio shares and disburses dividends and other distributions to Portfolio shareholders. The Portfolio does not pay a fee for this service.

The Portfolio may invest in the AllianceBernstein Fixed-Income Shares, Inc. – Government STIF Portfolio (“Government STIF Portfolio”), an open-end management investment company managed by the Adviser. The Government STIF Portfolio is offered as a cash management option to mutual funds and other institutional accounts of the Adviser, and is not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The Government STIF Portfolio pays no investment management fees but does bear its own expenses. A summary of the Portfolio’s transactions in shares of the Government STIF Portfolio for the six months ended October 31, 2014 is as follows:

 

Market Value

April 30, 2014

(000)

  Purchases
at Cost
(000)
    Sales
Proceeds
(000)
    Market Value
October 31, 2014
(000)
    Dividend
Income
(000)
 
$    8,443   $     106,679      $     102,031      $     13,091      $     4   

NOTE C

Investment Transactions

Purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term investments) for the six months ended October 31, 2014 were as follows:

 

     Purchases     Sales  

Investment securities (excluding U.S. government securities)

   $     87,657,618      $     34,911,202   

U.S. government securities

     – 0  –      – 0  – 

 

40     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

The cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, gross unrealized appreciation and unrealized depreciation are as follows:

 

Gross unrealized appreciation

   $ 25,864,593   

Gross unrealized depreciation

     (2,313,981
  

 

 

 

Net unrealized appreciation

   $     23,550,612   
  

 

 

 

1. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Portfolio may use derivatives in an effort to earn income and enhance returns, to replace more traditional direct investments, to obtain exposure to otherwise inaccessible markets (collectively, “investment purposes”), or to hedge or adjust the risk profile of its portfolio.

The principal types of derivatives utilized by the Portfolio, as well as the methods in which they may be used are:

 

   

Option Transactions

For hedging and investment purposes, the Portfolio may purchase and write (sell) put and call options on U.S. and foreign government securities and foreign currencies that are traded on U.S. and foreign securities exchanges and over-the-counter markets.

The risk associated with purchasing an option is that the Portfolio pays a premium whether or not the option is exercised. Additionally, the Portfolio bears the risk of loss of the premium and change in market value should the counterparty not perform under the contract. Put and call options purchased are accounted for in the same manner as portfolio securities. The cost of securities acquired through the exercise of call options is increased by premiums paid. The proceeds from securities sold through the exercise of put options are decreased by the premiums paid.

The Portfolio may also invest in options on swap agreements, also called “swaptions”. A swaption is an option that gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to enter into a swap on a future date in exchange for paying a market-based “premium”. A receiver swaption gives the owner the right to receive the total return of a specified asset, reference rate, or index. A payer swaption gives the owner the right to pay the total return on a specified asset, reference rate, or index. Swaptions also include options that allow an existing swap to be terminated or extended by one of the counterparties.

When the Portfolio writes an option, the premium received by the Portfolio is recorded as a liability and is subsequently adjusted to the current market value of the option written. Premiums received from written options which expire unexercised are recorded by the Portfolio on the expiration date as realized gains from options written. The difference

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       41   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

between the premium received and the amount paid on effecting a closing purchase transaction, including brokerage commissions, is also treated as a realized gain, or if the premium received is less than the amount paid for the closing purchase transaction, as a realized loss. If a call option is exercised, the premium received is added to the proceeds from the sale of the underlying security or currency in determining whether the Portfolio has realized a gain or loss. If a put option is exercised, the premium received reduces the cost basis of the security or currency purchased by the Portfolio. In writing an option, the Portfolio bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of the security or currency underlying the written option. Exercise of an option written by the Portfolio could result in the Portfolio selling or buying a security or currency at a price different from the current market value.

For the six months ended October 31, 2014, the Portfolio had no transactions in written options.

During the six months ended October 31, 2014, the Portfolio held purchased options for hedging purposes.

 

   

Swaps

The Portfolio may enter into swaps to hedge its exposure to interest rates, credit risk, or currencies. The Portfolio may also enter into swaps for non-hedging purposes as a means of gaining market exposures, including by making direct investments in foreign currencies. A swap is an agreement that obligates two parties to exchange a series of cash flows at specified intervals based upon or calculated by reference to changes in specified prices or rates for a specified amount of an underlying asset. The payment flows are usually netted against each other, with the difference being paid by one party to the other. In addition, collateral may be pledged or received by the Portfolio in accordance with the terms of the respective swaps to provide value and recourse to the Portfolio or its counterparties in the event of default, bankruptcy or insolvency by one of the parties to the swap.

Risks may arise as a result of the failure of the counterparty to the swap to comply with the terms of the swap. The loss incurred by the failure of a counterparty is generally limited to the net interim payment to be received by the Portfolio, and/or the termination value at the end of the contract. Therefore, the Portfolio considers the creditworthiness of each counterparty to a swap in evaluating potential counterparty risk. This risk is mitigated by having a netting arrangement between the Portfolio and the counterparty and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the Portfolio to cover the Portfolio’s exposure to the counterparty. Additionally, risks may arise from unanticipated movements in interest rates or in the value of the underlying securities. The Portfolio accrues for the interim payments on swaps on a daily basis, with the net amount

 

42     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

recorded within unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swaps on the statement of assets and liabilities, where applicable. Once the interim payments are settled in cash, the net amount is recorded as realized gain/(loss) on swaps on the statement of operations, in addition to any realized gain/(loss) recorded upon the termination of swaps. Upfront premiums paid or received are recognized as cost or proceeds on the statement of assets and liabilities and are amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the contract. Amortized upfront premiums are included in net realized gain/(loss) from swaps on the statement of operations. Fluctuations in the value of swaps are recorded as a component of net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swaps on the statement of operations.

Certain standardized swaps, including certain interest rate swaps and credit default swaps, are (or soon will be) subject to mandatory central clearing. Cleared swaps are transacted through futures commission merchants (“FCMs”) that are members of central clearinghouses, with the clearinghouse serving as central counterparty, similar to transactions in futures contracts. Centralized clearing will be required for additional categories of swaps on a phased-in basis based on requirements published by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

At the time the Portfolio enters into a centrally cleared swap, the Portfolio deposits and maintains as collateral an initial margin with the broker, as required by the exchange on which the transaction is effected. Such amount is shown as due from broker on the statement of assets and liabilities. Pursuant to the contract, the Portfolio agrees to receive from or pay to the broker an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in the value of the contract. Such receipts or payments are known as variation margin and are recorded by the Portfolio as unrealized gains or losses. Risks may arise from the potential of a counterparty to meet the terms of the contract. The credit/counterparty risk for swaps cleared through a central clearing house exchange is generally less than privately negotiated swaps, since the clearinghouse, which is the issuer or counterparty to each exchange-traded swap, has robust risk mitigation standards, including the requirement to provide initial and variation margin. When the contract is closed, the Portfolio records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the time it was closed.

Credit Default Swaps:

The Portfolio may enter into credit default swaps, including to manage its exposure to the market or certain sectors of the market, to reduce its risk exposure to defaults by corporate and sovereign issuers held by the Portfolio, or to create exposure to corporate or sovereign issuers to which it is not otherwise exposed. The Portfolio may purchase credit protection

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       43   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

(“Buy Contract”) or provide credit protection (“Sale Contract”) on the referenced obligation of the credit default swap. During the term of the swap, the Portfolio receives/(pays) fixed payments from/(to) the respective counterparty, calculated at the agreed upon rate applied to the notional amount. If the Portfolio is a buyer/(seller) of protection and a credit event occurs, as defined under the terms of the swap, the Portfolio will either (i) receive from the seller/(pay to the buyer) of protection an amount equal to the notional amount of the swap (the “Maximum Payout Amount”) and deliver/(take delivery of) the referenced obligation or (ii) receive/(pay) a net settlement amount in the form of cash or securities equal to the notional amount of the swap less the recovery value of the referenced obligation.

In certain circumstances Maximum Payout Amounts may be partially offset by recovery values of the respective referenced obligations, upfront premium received upon entering into the agreement, or net amounts received from settlement of buy protection credit default swaps entered into by the Portfolio for the same reference obligation with the same counterparty. As of October 31, 2014, the Portfolio did not have Buy Contracts outstanding with respect to the same referenced obligation and counterparty Sale Contracts outstanding.

Credit default swaps may involve greater risks than if a Portfolio had invested in the referenced obligation directly. Credit default swaps are subject to general market risk, liquidity risk, counterparty risk and credit risk. If the Portfolio is a buyer of protection and no credit event occurs, it will lose the payments it made to its counterparty. If the Portfolio is a seller of protection and a credit event occurs, the value of the referenced obligation received by the Portfolio coupled with the periodic payments previously received, may be less than the Maximum Payout Amount it pays to the buyer, resulting in a net loss to the Portfolio.

During the six months ended October 31, 2014, the Portfolio held credit default swaps for hedging purposes.

Implied credit spreads over U.S. Treasuries of comparable maturity utilized in determining the market value of credit default swaps on issuers as of period end are disclosed in the portfolio of investments. The implied spreads serve as an indicator of the current status of the payment/performance risk and typically reflect the likelihood of default by the issuer of the referenced obligation. The implied credit spread of a particular reference obligation also reflects the cost of buying/selling protection and may reflect upfront payments required to be made to enter into the agreement. Widening credit spreads typically represent a deterioration of the referenced obligation’s credit soundness and greater likelihood of default or other credit event occurring as defined under the terms of the agreement. A credit spread identified as “Defaulted” indicates a credit event has occurred for the referenced obligation.

 

44     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

The Portfolio typically enters into International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Master Agreements (“ISDA Master Agreement”) or similar master agreements (collectively, “Master Agreements”) with its OTC derivative contract counterparties in order to, among other things, reduce its credit risk to counterparties. ISDA Master Agreements include provisions for general obligations, representations, collateral and events of default or termination. Under an ISDA Master Agreement, the Portfolio typically may offset with the counterparty certain derivative financial instrument’s payables and/or receivables with collateral held and/or posted and create one single net payment (close-out netting) in the event of default or termination.

Various Master Agreements govern the terms of certain transactions with counterparties, including transactions such as exchange-traded derivative transactions, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements. These Master Agreements typically attempt to reduce the counterparty risk associated with such transactions by specifying credit protection mechanisms and providing standardization that improves legal certainty. Cross-termination provisions under Master Agreements typically provide that a default in connection with one transaction between the Portfolio and a counterparty gives the non-defaulting party the right to terminate any other transactions in place with the defaulting party to create one single net payment due to/due from the defaulting party. In the event of a default by a Master Agreements counterparty, the return of collateral with market value in excess of the Portfolio’s net liability, held by the defaulting party, may be delayed or denied.

The Portfolio’s Master Agreements may contain provisions for early termination of OTC derivative transactions in the event the net assets of the Portfolio decline below specific levels (“net asset contingent features”). If these levels are triggered, the Portfolio’s counterparty has the right to terminate such transaction and require the Portfolio to pay or receive a settlement amount in connection with the terminated transaction. For additional details, please refer to netting arrangements by counterparty tables below.

At October 31, 2014, the Portfolio had entered into the following derivatives:

 

    

Asset Derivatives

   

Liability Derivatives

Derivative Type

 

Statement of
Assets and
Liabilities
Location

  Fair Value    

Statement of
Assets and
Liabilities
Location

  Fair Value

Credit contracts

  Receivable/Payable for variation margin on exchange-traded derivatives   $ 182,881    
   

 

 

     

Total

    $   182,881       
   

 

 

     

 

*   Only variation margin receivable/payable at period end is reported within the statement of assets and liabilities. This amount reflects cumulative appreciation/(depreciation) of exchange-traded derivatives as reported in the portfolio of investments.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       45   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

The effect of derivative instruments on the statement of operations for the six months ended October 31, 2014:

 

Derivative Type

 

Location of Gain

or (Loss) on
Derivatives

  Realized Gain
or (Loss) on
Derivatives
    Change in
Unrealized
Appreciation or
(Depreciation)
 

Interest rate contracts

  Net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions; Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments   $ 90,700      $   (103,543

Credit contracts

  Net realized gain (loss) on swaps; Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swaps     103,103        182,881   
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

    $   193,803      $ 79,338   
   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table represents the volume of the Portfolio’s derivative transactions during the six months ended October 31, 2014:

 

Purchased Options:

  

Average monthly cost

   $ 3,500,000 (a) 

Centrally Cleared Credit Default Swaps:

  

Average notional amount of sale contracts

   $ 7,499,500 (b) 

 

(a)  

Positions were open for less than one month during the period.

 

(b)   

Positions were open for two months during the period.

For financial reporting purposes, the Portfolio does not offset derivative assets and derivative liabilities that are subject to netting arrangements in the statement of assets and liabilities.

All derivatives held at period end were subject to netting arrangements. The following table presents the Portfolio’s derivative assets and liabilities by counterparty net of amounts available for offset under Master Agreements (“MA”) and net of the related collateral received/ pledged by the Portfolio as of October 31, 2014:

 

Counterparty

  Derivative
Assets
Subject
to a MA
    Derivative
Available
for Offset
    Cash
Collateral
Received
    Security
Collateral
Received
    Net Amount of
Derivatives
Assets
 

Exchange-Traded Derivatives:

         

Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.*

  $ 26,759      $   – 0  –    $   – 0  –    $   – 0  –    $ 26,759   

Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC *

    445        – 0  –      – 0  –      – 0  –      445   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $   27,204      $   – 0  –    $   – 0  –    $   – 0  –    $   27,204   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*   Cash has been posted for initial margin requirements for exchange traded derivatives outstanding at October 31, 2014.

 

46     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

NOTE D

Shares of Beneficial Interest

Transactions in shares of beneficial interest were as follows:

 

            
     Shares         Amount      
     Six Months Ended
October 31, 2014
(unaudited)
   

Year Ended

April 30,

2014

        Six Months Ended
October 31, 2014
(unaudited)
   

Year Ended

April 30,

2014

     
  

 

 

   
Class A             

Shares sold

     11,412,447        31,461,205        $ 124,230,831      $ 321,686,866     

 

   

Shares redeemed

     (3,805,138     (13,878,157       (41,439,564     (138,652,582  

 

   

Net increase

     7,607,309        17,583,048        $ 82,791,267      $ 183,034,284     

 

   

NOTE E

Risks Involved in Investing in the Portfolio

Municipal Market Risk and Concentration of Credit Risk—This is the risk that special factors may adversely affect the value of municipal securities and have a significant effect on the yield or value of the Portfolio’s investments in municipal securities. These factors include economic conditions, political or legislative changes, uncertainties related to the tax status of municipal securities, or the rights of investors in these securities. An issuer or guarantor of a fixed-income security, or the counterparty to a derivatives or other contract, may be unable or unwilling to make timely payments of interest or principal, or to otherwise honor its obligations. The issuer or guarantor may default, causing a loss of the full principal amount of a security. The degree of risk for a particular security may be reflected in its credit rating. There is the possibility that the credit rating of a fixed-income security may be downgraded after purchase, which may adversely affect the value of the security. To the extent that the Portfolio invests more of its assets in a particular state’s municipal securities, the Portfolio may be vulnerable to events adversely affecting that state, including economic, political and regulatory occurrences, court decisions, terrorism and catastrophic natural disasters, such as hurricanes or earthquakes. The Portfolio’s investments in certain municipal securities with principal and interest payments that are made from the revenues of a specific project or facility, and not general tax revenues, may have increased risks. Factors affecting the project or facility, such as local business or economic conditions, could have a significant effect on the project’s ability to make payments of principal and interest on these securities.

Interest Rate Risk—Changes in interest rates will affect the value of investments in fixed-income securities. When interest rates rise, the value of investments in fixed-income securities tends to fall and this decrease in value may not be offset by higher income from new investments. Interest rate risk is generally greater for fixed-income securities with longer maturities or durations.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       47   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

Inflation Risk—This is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the value of the Portfolio’s assets can decline as can the value of the Portfolio’s distributions. This risk is significantly greater for fixed-income securities with longer maturities.

Derivatives Risk—The Portfolio may enter into derivative transactions such as forwards, options, futures and swaps. Derivatives may be illiquid, difficult to price, and leveraged so that small changes may produce disproportionate losses for the Portfolio, and subject to counterparty risk to a greater degree than more traditional investments. Derivatives may result in significant losses, including losses that are far greater than the value of the derivatives reflected in the statement of assets and liabilities.

Financing and Related Transactions; Leverage and Other Risk—The Portfolio may utilize financial leverage, including tender option bond transactions, to seek to enhance the yield and net asset value. These objectives may not be achieved in all interest rate environments. Leverage creates certain risks for shareholders, including the likelihood of greater volatility of the net asset value. If income from the securities purchased from the funds made available by leverage is not sufficient to cover the cost of leverage, the Portfolio’s return will be less than if leverage had not been used. As a result, the amounts available for distribution as dividends and other distributions will be reduced. During periods of rising short-term interest rates, the interest paid on the floaters in tender option bond transactions would increase, which may adversely affect the Portfolio’s income and distribution to shareholders. A decline in distributions would adversely affect the Portfolio’s yield. If rising short-term rates coincide with a period of rising long-term rates, the value of the long-term municipal bonds purchased with the proceeds of leverage would decline, adversely affecting the net asset value.

In a tender option bond transaction, the Portfolio may transfer a highly rated fixed-rate municipal security to a broker, which, in turn, deposits the bond into a special purpose vehicle (typically, a trust) usually sponsored by the broker. The Portfolio receives cash and a residual interest security (sometimes referred to as an “inverse floater”) issued by the trust in return. The trust simultaneously issues securities, which pay an interest rate that is reset each week based on an index of high-grade short-term seven-day demand notes. These securities, sometimes referred to as “floaters”, are bought by third parties, including tax-exempt money market funds, and can be tendered by these holders to a liquidity provider at par, unless certain events occur. The Portfolio continues to earn all the interest from the transferred bond less the amount of interest paid on the floaters and the expenses of the trust, which include payments to the trustee and the liquidity provider and organizational costs. The Portfolio also uses the cash received from the transaction for investment purposes or to retire other forms of leverage. Under certain circumstances, the trust may be terminated and collapsed, either by the

 

48     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

Portfolio or upon the occurrence of certain events, such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying bond, or in the event holders of the floaters tender their securities to the liquidity provider. See Note G to the Financial Statements “Floating Rate Notes in Connection with Securities Held” for more information about tender option bond transactions.

The Portfolio may also purchase inverse floaters from a tender option bond trust in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying bond. The income received from an inverse floater varies inversely with the short-term interest rate paid on the floaters issued by the trust. The prices of inverse floaters are subject to greater volatility than the prices of fixed-income securities that are not inverse floaters. Investments in inverse floaters may amplify the risks of leverage. If short-term interest rates rise, the interest payable on the floaters would increase and income from the inverse floaters decrease.

Tax Risk—There is no guarantee that all of the Portfolio’s income will remain exempt from federal or state income taxes. From time to time, the U.S. Government and the U.S. Congress consider changes in federal tax law that could limit or eliminate the federal tax exemption for municipal bond income, which would in effect reduce the net income received by shareholders from the Portfolio by increasing taxes on that income. In such event, the Portfolio’s NAV could also decline as yields on municipal bonds, which are typically lower than those on taxable bonds, would be expected to increase to approximately the yield of comparable taxable bonds. Actions or anticipated actions affecting the tax exempt status of municipal bonds could also result in significant shareholder redemptions of Portfolio shares as investors anticipate adverse effects on the Portfolio or seek higher yields to offset the potential loss of the tax deduction. As a result, the Portfolio would be required to maintain higher levels of cash to meet the redemptions, which would negatively affect the Portfolio’s yield.

Liquidity Risk—Liquidity risk exists when particular investments are difficult to purchase or sell, possibly preventing the Portfolio from selling out of these illiquid or relatively less liquid securities at an advantageous price. Causes of liquidity risk may include low trading volume, lack of a market maker, a large position, heavy redemptions, or legal restrictions that limit or prevent a Portfolio from selling securities or closing derivative positions at desirable prices or opportune times. Over recent years, the capacity of dealers to make markets in fixed income securities has been outpaced by the growth in the size of the fixed income markets. Liquidity risk may be magnified in a rising interest rate environment, where the value and liquidity of fixed income securities generally go down. Derivatives and securities involving substantial market and credit risk tend to involve greater liquidity risk. Because the Portfolio invests in municipal securities, the Portfolio is subject to more liquidity risk because the market for municipal securities is generally smaller than many other markets. Illiquid securities and relatively less liquid securities may also be difficult to value.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       49   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

Redemption Risk—A Portfolio may experience heavy redemptions that could cause the Portfolio to liquidate its assets at inopportune times or at a loss or depressed value, which could cause the value of your investment to decline.

Duration Risk—Duration is the measure that relates the expected price volatility of a fixed-income security to changes in interest rates. The duration of a fixed-income security may be shorter than or equal to full maturity of a fixed-income security. Fixed-income securities with longer durations have more risk and will decrease in price as interest rates rise. For example, a fixed-income security with a duration of three years will decrease in value by approximately 3% if interest rates increase by 1%.

Below Investment Grade Securities Risk—Investments in fixed-income securities with lower ratings (commonly known as “junk bonds”) tend to have a higher probability that an issuer will default or fail to meet its payment obligations. These securities may be subject to greater price volatility due to such factors as specific corporate developments, interest rate sensitivity, negative performance of the junk bond market generally and less secondary market liquidity.

Indemnification Risk—In the ordinary course of business, the Portfolio enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Portfolio has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these indemnification provisions and expects the risk of loss thereunder to be remote. Therefore, the Portfolio has not accrued any liability in connection with these indemnification provisions.

NOTE F

Distributions to Shareholders

The tax character of distributions to be paid for the year ending April 30, 2015 will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.

The tax character of distributions paid during the fiscal years ended April 30, 2014 and April 30, 2013 were as follows:

 

     2014      2013  

Distributions paid from:

     

Ordinary income

   $ 113,917       $ 288,117   

Long-term capital gains

     27,570         – 0  – 
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total taxable distributions

     141,487         288,117   

Tax exempt income

     13,640,346         3,624,060   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total distributions paid

   $     13,781,833       $     3,912,177   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

50     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

As of April 30, 2014, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:

 

Undistributed tax-exempt income

   $ 1,777,228   

Undistributed net capital gain

         (6,359,957 )(a) 

Unrealized appreciation/(depreciation)

     3,635,496 (b) 
  

 

 

 

Total accumulated earnings/(deficit)

   $ (947,233 )(c) 
  

 

 

 

 

(a)  

As of April 30, 2014, the Portfolio had a net capital loss carryforward of $6,359,957.

 

(b)  

The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax treatment of tender option bonds.

 

(c)  

The difference between book-basis and tax-basis components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) is attributable primarily to dividends payable.

For tax purposes, net capital losses may be carried over to offset future capital gains, if any. Funds are permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an indefinite period, and such losses will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses. As of April 30, 2014, the Portfolio had a net short-term capital loss carryforward of $6,097,644 and a net long-term capital loss carryforward of $262,313 which may be carried forward for an indefinite period.

NOTE G

Floating Rate Notes Issued in Connection with Securities Held

The Portfolio may engage in tender option bond transactions in which the Portfolio may transfer a fixed rate bond (“Fixed Rate Bond”) to a broker for cash. The broker deposits the Fixed Rate Bond into a Special Purpose Vehicle (the “SPV”, which is generally organized as a trust), organized by the broker. The Portfolio buys a residual interest in the assets and cash flows of the SPV, often referred to as an inverse floating rate obligation (“Inverse Floater”). The SPV also issues floating rate notes (“Floating Rate Notes”) which are sold to third parties. The Floating Rate Notes pay interest at rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to a liquidity provider for redemption at par. The Inverse Floater held by the Portfolio gives the Portfolio the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the trustee transfer the Fixed Rate Bond held by the SPV to the Portfolio, thereby collapsing the SPV. The SPV may also be collapsed in certain other circumstances. In accordance with U.S. GAAP requirements regarding accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities, the Portfolio accounts for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Fixed Rate Bond in its portfolio of investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption “Payable for floating rate notes issued” in its statement of assets and liabilities. Interest expense related to the Portfolio’s liability with respect to Floating Rate Notes is recorded as incurred. The interest expense is also included in the Portfolio’s expense ratio. At October 31, 2014, the amount of the Fund’s Floating Rate Notes outstanding was $5,545,000 and the related interest rate was 0.06% to 0.17%.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       51   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

The Portfolio may also purchase Inverse Floaters in the secondary market without first owning the underlying bond. Such an Inverse Floater is included in the Portfolio’s portfolio of investments but is not required to be treated as a secured borrowing and reflected in the Portfolio’s financial statements as a secured borrowing.

NOTE H

Subsequent Events

Management has evaluated subsequent events for possible recognition or disclosure in the financial statements through the date the financial statements are issued. Management has determined that there are no material events that would require disclosure in the Portfolio’s financial statements through this date.

 

52     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Selected Data For A Share Of Beneficial Interest Outstanding Throughout Each Period

 

   

Six Months

Ended

October 31,

2014

(unaudited)

    Year Ended April 30,    

September 1,

2010(a) to

April 30,

2011

 
      2014     2013     2012    
 

 

 

 

Net asset value, beginning of period

    $  10.64        $  11.22        $  10.50        $  9.24        $  10.00   
 

 

 

 

Income From Investment Operations

         

Net investment income(b)

    .27        .52        .47        .59        .32   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

    .43        (.59     .77       1.27        (.77
 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in net asset value from operations

    .70        (.07     1.24        1.86        (.45
 

 

 

 

Less: Dividends and Distributions

         

Dividends from net investment income

    (.27     (.51     (.52     (.60     (.31

Distributions from net realized gain on investment transactions

    – 0  –      (.00 )(c)      – 0  –      – 0  –      – 0  – 
 

 

 

 

Total dividends and distributions

    (.27     (.51     (.52     (.60     (.31
 

 

 

 

Net asset value, end of period

    $  11.07        $  10.64        $  11.22        $  10.50        $  9.24   
 

 

 

 

Total Return

         

Total investment return based on net asset value(d)

    6.58  %      (.28 )%      11.98  %      20.74  %      (4.42 )% 

Ratios/Supplemental Data

         

Net assets, end of period
(000’s omitted)

    $481,316        $381,668        $205,258        $17,606        $9,419   

Ratio to average net assets of:

         

Expenses(e)

    .07  %^      .01  %      .03  %      .05  %      .02  %^ 

Net investment income

    4.78  %^      5.03  %      4.41  %      6.06  %      5.03  %^ 

Portfolio turnover rate

    9  %      34  %      7  %      17  %      14  % 

 

(a)   Commencement of operations.

 

(b)   Based on average shares outstanding.

 

(c)   Amount is less than $0.005.

 

(d)   Total investment return is calculated assuming an initial investment made at the net asset value at the beginning of the period, reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at net asset value during the period, and redemption on the last day of the period. Total return does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Total investment return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized.

 

(e)   The expense ratios, excluding interest expense are .00%, .00%, .00%, .00% and .00%, respectively.

 

  Due to timing of sales and repurchase of capital shares, the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) per share is not in accord with the Portfolio’s change in net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions for the period.

 

^   Annualized.

See notes to financial statements.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       53   

Financial Highlights


BOARD OF TRUSTEES

 

Marshall C. Turner, Jr.(1), Chairman

John H. Dobkin(1)

Michael J. Downey(1)

William H. Foulk, Jr.(1)

D. James Guzy(1)

  

Nancy P. Jacklin(1)

Robert M. Keith, President and Chief Executive Officer

Garry L. Moody(1)

Earl D. Weiner(1)

  
  
  
  

OFFICERS

Philip L. Kirstein, Senior Vice President and Independent Compliance Officer

Michael G. Brooks(2), Vice President

Robert “Guy” B. Davidson III(2), Vice President

Wayne D. Godlin(2), Vice President

  

Terrance T. Hults(2) , Vice President

Emilie D. Wrapp, Secretary

Joseph J. Mantineo, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Phyllis J. Clarke, Controller

Vincent S. Noto, Chief Compliance Officer

 

Custodian and Accounting Agent

State Street Bank and Trust Company
State Street Corporation CCB/5
1 Iron Street
Boston, MA 02210

 

Principal Underwriter

AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc.
1345 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10105

 

Transfer Agent

AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 786003
San Antonio, TX 78278-6003
Toll-Free (800) 221-5672

  

Legal Counsel

Seward & Kissel LLP

One Battery Park Plaza

New York, NY 10004

 

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Ernst & Young LLP

5 Times Square

New York, NY 10036

 

(1)   Member of the Audit Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Independent Directors Committee.

 

(2)   The day-to-day management of, and investment decisions for, the Trust’s Portfolio are made by the Municipal Bond Investment Team. Messrs. Michael G. Brooks, Robert “Guy” B. Davidson III, Wayne D. Godlin and Terrance T. Hults are the investment professionals primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Trust’s Portfolio.

 

54     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

Board of Trustees


 

 

THE FOLLOWING IS NOT PART OF THE SHAREHOLDER REPORT OR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SUMMARY OF SENIOR OFFICER’S EVALUATION OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT1

The following is a summary of the evaluation of the Investment Advisory Agreement between AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”) and AllianceBernstein Corporate Shares (the “Trust”) with respect to AllianceBernstein Municipal Income Shares (the “Portfolio”).2 The evaluation of the Investment Advisory Agreement was prepared by Philip L. Kirstein, the Senior Officer of the Trust, for the Trustees of the Trust, as required by the September 1, 2004 Assurance of Discontinuance (“AoD”) between the Adviser and the New York State Attorney General (the “NYAG”). The Senior Officer’s evaluation of the Investment Advisory Agreement is not meant to diminish the responsibility or authority of the Board of Trustees to perform its duties pursuant to Section 15 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 Act (the “40 Act”) and applicable state law. The purpose of this summary is to provide shareholders with a synopsis of the independent evaluation of the reasonableness of the advisory fees proposed to be paid by the Portfolio which was provided to the Trustees in connection with their review of the proposed approval of the continuance of the Investment Advisory Agreement.

The Senior Officer’s evaluation considered the following factors:

 

  1. Advisory fees charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services;

 

  2. Advisory fees charged by other mutual fund companies for like services;

 

  3. Costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the advisory agreement, excluding any intra-corporate profit;

 

  4. Profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services;

 

  5. Possible economies of scale as the Portfolio grows larger; and

 

  6. Nature and quality of the Adviser’s services including the performance of the Portfolio.

These factors, with the exception of the first factor, are generally referred to as the “Gartenberg factors,” which were articulated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 1982. Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc., 694 F. 2d 923 (2d Cir. 1982). On March 30, 2010, the Supreme Court held the Gartenberg decision was correct in its basic formulation

 

1   The Senior Officer’s fee evaluation was completed on October 23, 2014 and discussed with the Board of Trustees on November 4-6, 2014.

 

2   Future references to the Portfolio do not include “AllianceBernstein.”

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       55   


 

 

of what Section 36(b) requires: to face liability under Section 36(b), “an investment adviser must charge a fee that is so disproportionately large that it bears no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and could not have been the product of arm’s length bargaining” Jones v. Harris Associates L.P., 130 S. Ct. 1418 (2010). In Jones, the Court stated the Gartenberg approach fully incorporates the correct understanding of fiduciary duty within the context of Section 36(b) and noted with approval that “Gartenberg insists that all relevant circumstances be taken into account” and “uses the range of fees that might result from arm’s-length bargaining as the benchmark for reviewing challenged fees.”3

PORTFOLIO’S EXEMPTION FROM ADVISORY FEES OR EXPENSES

The Portfolio pays no advisory fee to the Adviser for receiving the services to be provided pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement. The Portfolio is designed to serve the needs of providers of separately managed accounts (“SMAs”).4 Since SMA clients pay their wrap program provider a unitary fee for managing all investments of their portfolio, the Portfolio will not pay an advisory fee. The Adviser will also reimburse the Portfolio for all of its other operating expenses, except certain extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage costs and the interest on borrowed money.

The Portfolio’s net assets on September 30, 2014 are set forth below:

 

Portfolio    9/30/14
Net Assets ($MM)
 

Municipal Income Shares

   $     459.0   

The Portfolio, which offers only one no-load class of shares, is distributed through its principal underwriter, AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (“ABI”). Since the Portfolio is reimbursed by the Adviser for its operating expenses, the Portfolio does not have a distribution plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 40 Act.

 

I. ADVISORY FEES CHARGED TO INSTITUTIONAL AND OTHER CLIENTS

The advisory fees charged to investment companies which the Adviser manages and sponsors are normally higher than those charged to similar sized institutional accounts, including pension plans and sub-advised investment companies. The fee differential reflects, among other things, different services provided to such clients, and different liabilities assumed. Services provided by the Adviser to the Portfolio that are not provided to non-investment company clients include providing office space and personnel to serve as Fund Officers, who among other responsibilities make the certifications required under the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, and coordinating with and monitoring the Portfolio’s third party service

 

3   Jones v. Harris at 1427.
4   The wrap program providers that offer SMAs currently employ the Adviser as one of several investment managers, and compensate the Adviser on the basis of all SMA assets managed by it, which would include assets of Municipal Income Shares.

 

56     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES


 

 

providers such as Fund counsel, auditors, custodians, transfer agents and pricing services. The accounting, administrative, legal and compliance requirements for the Portfolio are more costly than those for institutional client assets due to the greater complexities and time required for investment companies. The Adviser also believes that it incurs substantial entrepreneurial risk when offering a new mutual fund since establishing a new mutual fund requires a large upfront investment and it may take a long time for the fund to achieve profitability since the fund must be priced to scale from inception in order to be competitive and assets are acquired one account at a time. In addition, managing the cash flow of an investment company may be more difficult than that of a stable pool of assets, such as an institutional account with little cash movement in either direction, particularly if the Portfolio is in net redemption and the Adviser is frequently forced to sell securities to raise cash for redemptions. However, managing a fund with positive cash flow may be easier at times than managing a stable pool of assets. Finally, in recent years, investment advisers have been sued by institutional clients and have suffered reputational damage both by the attendant publicity and outcomes other than complete victories. Accordingly, the legal and reputational risks associated with institutional accounts are greater than previously thought, although arguably still not equal to those related to the mutual fund industry.

Notwithstanding the Adviser’s view that managing an investment company is not comparable to managing other institutional accounts because the services provided are different, the Supreme Court has indicated consideration should be given to the advisory fees charged to institutional accounts with a similar investment style as the Portfolio.5 However, with respect to the Portfolio, the Adviser represented that there is no institutional product in the Adviser’s Form ADV that has a similar investment style as the Portfolio.

The Adviser represented that it does provide sub-advisory services to other companies that have a substantially similar investment style as the Portfolio.

 

II. MANAGEMENT FEES CHARGED BY OTHER MUTUAL FUND COMPANIES FOR LIKE SERVICES.

Lipper, Inc., an analytical service that is not affiliated with the Adviser, compared the fees charged to the Portfolio to the fees charged to other investment

 

5   The Supreme Court stated that “courts may give such comparisons the weight that they merit in light of the similarities and differences between the services that the clients in question require, but the courts must be wary of inapt comparisons.” Among the significant differences the Supreme Court noted that may exist between services provided to mutual funds and institutional accounts are “higher marketing costs.” Jones v. Harris at 1428.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       57   


 

 

companies for similar services by other investment advisers.6,7 Each peer selected by Lipper had a similar fee arrangement as the Portfolio, which is to say that with respect to the Portfolio’s peers, all of their fund expenses, including management fees, were reimbursed by their respective investment advisers.8

The Portfolio does not pay an advisory fee to the Adviser since the SMA clients pay their wrap program provider a unitary fee for managing all investments of their portfolios. In addition, the Adviser reimburses the Portfolio for all of its operating expenses, except certain extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage costs and interest on borrowed money.

 

III. COSTS TO THE ADVISER AND ITS AFFILIATES OF SUPPLYING SERVICES PURSUANT TO THE ADVISORY FEE ARRANGEMENT, EXCLUDING ANY INTRA-CORPORATE PROFIT.

The Adviser utilizes two profitability reporting systems, which operate independently but are aligned with each other, to estimate the Adviser’s profitability in connection with investment advisory services provided to the Portfolio. The Senior Officer has retained a consultant to provide independent advice regarding the alignment of the two profitability systems as well as the methodologies and allocations utilized by both profitability systems. See Section IV for additional discussion.

 

IV. PROFIT MARGINS OF THE ADVISER AND ITS AFFILIATES FOR SUPPLYING SUCH SERVICES.

The profitability information for the Portfolio, prepared by the Adviser for the Board of Trustees, was reviewed by the Senior Officer and the consultant. The Portfolio does not pay an advisory fee to the Adviser. However, the Adviser does profit indirectly through the advisory fees that it receives from the wrap program providers whose SMA clients invest in the Portfolio. The Adviser’s profitability with respect to the Portfolio, which was negative in 2013, was calculated using a weighted average of the profitability of the relevant SMA assets, in addition to any fund specific revenue or expense items.

 

6   The Supreme Court cautioned against accepting mutual fund fee comparisons without careful scrutiny since “these comparisons are problematic because these fees, like those challenged, may not be the product of negotiations conducted at arm’s length.” Jones v. Harris at 1429.

 

7   Only zero fee no-load funds that participated in a wrap fee program were considered for inclusion in the Portfolio’s EG, regardless of the Lipper investment classification/objective of the Portfolio’s peers. The Portfolio’s EG peers includes two BBB-rated Corporate Debt Funds (“BBB”), three Multi-Sector Income Fund (“MSI”), one Short-Intermediate Investment Grade Debt Fund (“SII”), three General Bond Funds (“GB”), two Core Bond Funds (“IID”), one General & Insured Municipal Debt Fund (“GM”), one Inflation-Protected Bond Fund (“IUT”), two Global Income Funds (“GLI”) and one Intermediate Municipal Debt Fund (“IMD”). The Portfolio is classified by Lipper as a High Yield Municipal Debt Fund (“HM”).

 

8   “Management Fee” is the fee attributable to the management and bearing of expenses of the funds (not the management of the wrap fee program). In each case, the advisory contract provides for an advisory or management fee of zero.

 

58     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES


 

 

AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (“ABI”) and AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc. (“ABIS”), affiliates of the Adviser, serve as the Portfolio’s underwriter and transfer agent, respectively. The courts have referred to this type of business relationships as “fall-out benefits” to the Adviser and indicated that such benefits should be factored into the evaluation of the total relationship between the Portfolio and the Adviser. Neither case law nor common business practice precludes the Adviser’s affiliates from earning a reasonable profit on this type of relationship provided the affiliates’ charges and services are competitive. However, neither ABI nor ABIS receive a fee for serving as the Portfolio’s underwriter and transfer agent.

 

V. POSSIBLE ECONOMIES OF SCALE

The Adviser has indicated that economies of scale are being shared with shareholders through pricing to scale, breakpoints, fee reductions/waivers and enhancement to services.

In May 2012, an independent consultant, retained by the Senior Officer, provided the Board of Trustees information on the Adviser’s firm-wide average costs from 2005 through 2011 and the potential economies of scale. The independent consultant noted that from 2005 through 2007 the Adviser experienced significant growth in assets under management (“AUM”). During this period, operating expenses increased, in part to keep up with growth, and in part reflecting market returns. However, from 2008 through the first quarter of 2009, AUM rapidly and significantly decreased due to declines in market value and client withdrawals. When AUM rapidly decreased, some operating expenses categories, including base compensation and office space, adjusted more slowly during this period, resulting in an increase in average costs. Since 2009, AUM has experienced less significant changes. The independent consultant noted that changes in operating expenses reflect changes in business composition and business practices in response to changes in financial markets. Finally, the independent consultant concluded that the increase in average cost and the decline in net operating margin across the Adviser since late 2008 are inconsistent with the view that there are currently reductions in average costs due to economies of scale that can be shared with the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds managed by the Adviser through lower fees.

Previously, in February 2008, the independent consultant provided the Board of Trustees an update of the Deli9 study on advisory fees and various fund characteristics.10 The independent consultant first reiterated the results of his previous two dimensional comparison analysis (fund size and family size) with

 

9   The Deli study, originally published in 2002 based on 1997 data and updated for the February 2008 Presentation, may be of diminished value due to the age of the data used in the presentation and the changes experienced in the industry since 2008.

 

10   The Supreme Court cautioned against accepting mutual fund fee comparisons without careful scrutiny since the fees may not be the product of negotiations conducted at arm’s length. See Jones v. Harris at 1429.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       59   


 

 

the Board of Trustees.11 The independent consultant then discussed the results of the regression model that was utilized to study the effects of various factors on advisory fees. The regression model output indicated that the bulk of the variation in fees predicted were explained by various factors, but substantially by fund AUM, family AUM, index fund indicator and investment style. The independent consultant also compared the advisory fees of the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds to similar funds managed by 19 other large asset managers, regardless of the fund size and each Adviser’s proportion of mutual fund assets to non-mutual fund assets.

 

VI. NATURE AND QUALITY OF THE ADVISER’S SERVICES INCLUDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PORTFOLIO

With assets under management of approximately $473 billion as of September 30, 2014, the Adviser has the investment experience to manage and provide non-investment services (described in Section I) to the Portfolio.

The information below, prepared by Lipper, shows the 1 and 3 year gross performance returns and rankings of the Portfolio relative to its Lipper Performance Universe (“PU”)12 for the period ended July 31, 2014:

 

    

Portfolio

Return

(%)

    PU Median
(%)
    PU Rank  
Municipal Income Shares      

1 Year

    12.99        10.76        2/12   

3 Year

    9.18        8.19        1/11   

Set forth below are the 1, 3 year and since inception net performance returns of the Portfolio (in bold)13 versus its benchmark.14 Portfolio and benchmark volatility and reward-to-variability ratio (“Sharpe Ratio”) information is also shown.15

 

11   The two dimensional analysis showed patterns of lower advisory fees for funds with larger asset sizes and funds from larger family sizes compared to funds with smaller asset sizes and funds from smaller family sizes, which according to the independent consultant is indicative of a sharing of economies of scale and scope. However, in less liquid and active markets, such is not the case, as the empirical analysis showed potential for diseconomies of scale in those markets. The empirical analysis also showed diminishing economies of scale and scope as funds surpassed a certain high level of assets.

 

12   The Portfolio’s PU includes peers with the same Lipper investment classification/objective and load type as the Portfolio.

 

13   The performance returns of the Portfolio were provided Lipper. Lipper maintains its own database that includes the Portfolio’s performance returns.

 

14   The Adviser provided Portfolio and benchmark performance return information for the periods through July 31, 2014.

 

15   Portfolio and benchmark volatility and Sharpe Ratio information was obtained through Lipper LANA, a database maintained by Lipper. Volatility is a statistical measure of the tendency of a market price or yield to vary over time. A Sharpe Ratio is a risk adjusted measure of return that divides a fund’s return in excess of the riskless return by the fund’s standard deviation. A fund with a greater volatility would be viewed as more risky than a fund with equivalent performance but lower volatility; for that reason, a greater return would be demanded for the more risky fund. A fund with a higher Sharpe Ratio would be viewed as better performing than a fund with a lower Sharpe Ratio.

 

60     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES


 

 

    

Periods Ending July 31, 2014

Annualized Net Performance (%)

 
     1 Year
(%)
    3 Year
(%)
    Since
Inception
(%)
    Volatility
(%)
    Sharpe
(%)
    Risk Period
(Year)
 
Municipal Income     12.97        9.14        7.45        6.85        1.29        3   
Shares            
Barclays Capital     7.27        5.06        4.10        3.85        1.26        3   
Municipal Bond Index            
Inception Date: September 1, 2010         

CONCLUSION:

Based on the factors discussed above the Senior Officer’s conclusion is that the Investment Advisory Agreement for the Portfolio is reasonable and within the range of what would have been negotiated at arm’s-length in light of all the surrounding circumstances. This conclusion with respect to the Portfolio is based on an evaluation of all of these factors and no single factor was dispositive.

Dated: November 18, 2014

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       61   


THIS PAGE IS NOT PART OF THE SHAREHOLDER REPORT OR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN FAMILY OF FUNDS

 

US Equity

US Core

Core Opportunities Fund

Select US Equity Portfolio

US Growth

Concentrated Growth Fund

Discovery Growth Fund

Growth Fund

Large Cap Growth Fund

Small Cap Growth Portfolio

US Value

Discovery Value Fund

Equity Income Fund

Growth & Income Fund

Value Fund

International/Global Equity

International/Global Core

Global Equity & Covered Call Strategy Fund

Global Thematic Growth Fund

International Portfolio

Tax-Managed International Portfolio

International/Global Growth

International Growth Fund

International/Global Value

International Value Fund

Fixed Income

Municipal

High Income Municipal Portfolio

Intermediate California Portfolio

Intermediate Diversified Portfolio

Intermediate New York Portfolio

Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy

Tax-Aware Fixed Income Portfolio

National Portfolio

Arizona Portfolio

California Portfolio

Massachusetts Portfolio

Michigan Portfolio

Minnesota Portfolio

New Jersey Portfolio

New York Portfolio

Ohio Portfolio

Pennsylvania Portfolio

Virginia Portfolio

Taxable

Bond Inflation Strategy

Global Bond Fund

Fixed Income (continued)

Taxable

High Income Fund

High Yield Portfolio

Intermediate Bond Portfolio

Limited Duration High Income Portfolio

Short Duration Portfolio

Alternatives

All Market Real Return Portfolio*

Credit Long/Short Portfolio

Global Real Estate Investment Fund

Long/Short Multi-Manager Fund

Market Neutral Strategy-U.S.

Multi-Manager Alternative Strategies Fund

Select US Long/Short Portfolio

Unconstrained Bond Fund

Multi-Asset

All Market Growth Portfolio*

Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio

Global Risk Allocation Fund

Retirement Strategies

2000 Retirement Strategy

2005 Retirement Strategy

2010 Retirement Strategy

2015 Retirement Strategy

2020 Retirement Strategy

2025 Retirement Strategy

2030 Retirement Strategy

2035 Retirement Strategy

2040 Retirement Strategy

2045 Retirement Strategy

2050 Retirement Strategy

2055 Retirement Strategy

Wealth Strategies

Balanced Wealth Strategy

Conservative Wealth Strategy

Wealth Appreciation Strategy

Tax-Managed Balanced Wealth Strategy

Tax-Managed Conservative Wealth Strategy

Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy

Closed-End Funds

Alliance California Municipal Income Fund

Alliance New York Municipal Income Fund

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund

AllianceBernstein Income Fund

AllianceBernstein Multi-Manager Alternative Fund

AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund

 

We also offer Exchange Reserves, which serves as the money market fund exchange vehicle for the AllianceBernstein mutual funds. An investment in Exchange Reserves is not a deposit in a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. For copies of our prospectus or summary prospectus, which contain this and other information, visit us online at www.alliancebernstein.com or contact your AllianceBernstein investments representative. Please read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

* Prior to December 15, 2014, All Market Growth Portfolio was named Dynamic All Market Fund; All Market Real Return Portfolio was named Real Asset Strategy.

 

62     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

AllianceBernstein Family of Funds


NOTES

 

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       63   


NOTES

 

 

64     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES


NOTES

 

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       65   


NOTES

 

 

66     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES


NOTES

 

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES       67   


NOTES

 

 

68     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES


ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN MUNICIPAL INCOME SHARES

1345 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10105

800.221.5672

 

LOGO

 

 

MIS-0152-1014   LOGO


SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT

 

AllianceBernstein

Taxable Multi-Sector Income Shares

 

October 31, 2014

 

Semi-Annual Report

 

LOGO


 

Investment Products Offered

 

• Are Not FDIC Insured

• May Lose Value

• Are Not Bank Guaranteed

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. For copies of our prospectus or summary prospectus, which contain this and other information, visit us online at www.alliancebernstein.com or contact your AllianceBernstein Investments representative. Please read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

This shareholder report must be preceded or accompanied by the Fund’s prospectus for individuals who are not current shareholders of the Fund.

You may obtain a description of the Fund’s proxy voting policies and procedures, and information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, without charge. Simply visit AllianceBernstein’s website at www.alliancebernstein.com, or go to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “Commission”) website at www.sec.gov, or call AllianceBernstein at (800) 227-4618.

The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s Forms N-Q are available on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. The Fund’s Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC; information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.

AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (ABI) is the distributor of the AllianceBernstein family of mutual funds. ABI is a member of FINRA and is an affiliate of AllianceBernstein L.P., the manager of the funds.

AllianceBernstein® and the AB Logo are registered trademarks and service marks used by permission of the owner, AllianceBernstein L.P.


December 9, 2014

 

Semi-Annual Report

This report provides management’s discussion of fund performance for AllianceBernstein Taxable Multi-Sector Income Shares (the “Fund”) for the semi-annual reporting period ended October 31, 2014. Please note, shares of this Fund are offered exclusively through registered investment advisers approved by AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”).

Investment Objectives and Policies

The Fund’s investment objective is to generate income and price appreciation. The Fund invests, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets in fixed-income securities. The Fund may invest in a broad range of securities in both developed and emerging markets. The Fund may invest across all fixed-income sectors, including corporate and U.S. and non-U.S. Government securities. The Fund may invest up to 50% of its assets in below investment grade bonds (“junk bonds”). The Fund expects to invest in readily marketable fixed-income securities with a range of maturities from short- to long-term.

The Fund may invest without limit in U.S. dollar-denominated foreign fixed-income securities and may invest up to 50% of its assets in non-U.S. dollar-denominated foreign fixed-income securities. These investments may include, in each case, developed and emerging market debt securities.

The Fund may invest in mortgage-related and other asset-backed securities, loan participations, inflation-protected securities, structured securities, variable, floating, and inverse floating rate

instruments and preferred stock, and may use other investment techniques. The Fund may use leverage for investment purposes. The Fund intends, among other things, to enter into transactions such as reverse repurchase agreements, forward contracts, and dollar rolls. The Fund may invest, without limit, in derivatives, such as options, futures, forwards or swap agreements.

Currencies can have a dramatic effect on returns of non-U.S. dollar-denominated fixed-income securities, significantly adding to returns in some years and greatly diminishing them in others. The Adviser evaluates currency and fixed-income positions separately and may seek to hedge the currency exposure resulting from the Fund’s fixed-income securities positions when it finds the currency exposure unattractive. To hedge a portion of its currency risk, the Fund may from time to time invest in currency-related derivatives, including forward currency exchange contracts, futures, options on futures, swaps and options. The Adviser may also seek investment opportunities by taking long or short positions in currencies through the use of currency-related derivatives.

The Adviser selects securities for purchase or sale based on its assessment of the securities’ risk and return characteristics as well as the securities’ impact on the overall risk and return characteristics of the Fund. In making this assessment, the Adviser takes into account various factors including the credit quality and sensitivity to interest rates of the securities under consideration and of the Fund’s other holdings.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       1   


Investment Results

The table on page 5 shows the Fund’s performance compared to its benchmark, the Barclays U.S. Aggregate ex-Government Bond Index, for the six- and 12-month periods ended October 31, 2014.

The Fund underperformed its benchmark for both periods; a shorter-than-benchmark duration positioning was the primary detractor. For the six-month period, an underweight to agency mortgages, exposure to inflation-protected securities and an overweight to investment-grade corporates also detracted from returns. Security selection within corporates, specifically shorter-maturity corporates which outperformed longer-maturity corporates in the benchmark contributed to returns. For the 12-month period, shorter-maturity corporates detracted, as longer-maturity corporates held within the benchmark outperformed. An allocation to U.S. Treasuries and inflation-protected securities also detracted for the 12-month period, while an overweight to the corporate sector and exposure to agency mortgages contributed.

During both periods, derivatives in the form of Treasury futures were utilized to manage duration and yield curve positioning, and credit default swaps were utilized for investment purposes, which had an immaterial impact on performance.

Market Review and Investment Strategy

Markets remained heavily focused on the direction of interest rates, central

bank monetary policy and global growth during the six-month period. Ongoing geopolitical concerns, specifically the conflict between Ukraine and Russia, as well as continued violence in the Middle East, contributed to periodic safe haven rallies into U.S. Treasuries, keeping a lid on yields.

Contrary to investors’ expectations, interest rates continued to decline toward the end of the six-month period as investors became increasingly wary regarding global growth, particularly in Europe and China. Against this backdrop, fixed-income sectors continued to post positive returns, and benefited from the low-yield environment. Within the corporate space, increased volatility in the second half of the six-month period led longer-maturity corporates to underperform shorter maturity corporates on an excess return basis. Within the corporate universe, subordinated banks outperformed, as did communications and utility sectors.

Corporate valuations, in the view of the Core Fixed-Income Team (the “Team”), are generally fair, and fundamentals remain solid. But at this stage in the credit cycle, with mergers and acquisitions on the rise, careful security selection and diversification remain important safeguards against idiosyncratic risk. Unlike industrial companies, financial firms continue to deleverage and, in the Team’s view, remain an attractive opportunity. The Fund remains overweight financials (banks and insurance) and the Team still sees better value in subordinated issues over senior debt.

 

2     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES


DISCLOSURES AND RISKS

Benchmark Disclosure

The unmanaged Barclays U.S. Aggregate ex-Government Bond Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a fund. The Barclays U.S. Aggregate ex-Government Bond Index represents the performance of securities within the U.S. investment-grade fixed-rate bond market, with index components for corporate securities, mortgage pass-through securities, asset-backed securities, and commercial mortgage backed securities. An investor cannot invest directly in an index, and its results are not indicative of the performance for any specific investment, including the Fund.

A Word About Risk

Market Risk: The value of the Fund’s assets will fluctuate as the stock or bond market fluctuates. The value of the Fund’s investments may decline, sometimes rapidly and unpredictably, simply because of economic changes or other events that affect large portions of the market.

Interest Rate Risk: Changes in interest rates will affect the value of investments in fixed-income securities. When interest rates rise, the value of investments in fixed-income securities tends to fall and this decrease in value may not be offset by higher income from new investments. Interest rate risk is generally greater for fixed-income securities with longer maturities or durations.

Credit Risk: An issuer or guarantor of a fixed-income security, or the counterparty to a derivatives or other contract, may be unable or unwilling to make timely payments of interest or principal, or to otherwise honor its obligations. The issuer or guarantor may default, causing a loss of the full principal amount of a security. The degree of risk for a particular security may be reflected in its credit rating. There is the possibility that the credit rating of a fixed-income security may be downgraded after purchase, which may adversely affect the value of the security.

Below Investment Grade Securities Risk: Investments in fixed-income securities with lower ratings (commonly known as “junk bonds”) tend to have a higher probability that an issuer will default or fail to meet its payment obligations. These securities may be subject to greater price volatility due to such factors as specific corporate developments, interest rate sensitivity, negative perceptions of the junk bond market generally and less secondary market liquidity.

Inflation Risk: This is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the value of the Fund’s assets can decline as can the value of the Fund’s distributions. This risk is significantly greater for fixed-income securities with longer maturities.

Foreign (Non-U.S.) Risk: Investments in securities of non-U.S. issuers may involve more risk than those of U.S. issuers. These securities may fluctuate more widely in price and may be less liquid due to adverse market, economic, political, regulatory or other factors.

Emerging Market Risk: Investments in emerging market countries may have more risk because the markets are less developed and less liquid as well as being subject to increased economic, political, regulatory or other uncertainties.

Currency Risk: Fluctuations in currency exchange risk may negatively affect the value of the Fund’s investments or reduce its returns.

Prepayment Risk: The value of mortgage-related or asset-backed securities may be particularly sensitive to changes in prevailing interest rates. Early payments of principal on some mortgage-related securities may occur during periods of falling mortgage interest rates and expose the Fund to a lower rate of return upon reinvestment of principal. Early payments associated with mortgage-related securities cause these

 

(Disclosures, Risks and Note about Historical Performance continued on next page)

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       3   

Disclosures and Risks


DISCLOSURES AND RISKS

(continued from previous page)

 

securities to experience significantly greater price and yield volatility than is experienced by traditional fixed-income securities. During periods of rising interest rates, a reduction in prepayments may increase the effective life of mortgage-related securities, subjecting them to greater risk of decline in market value in response to rising interest rates. If the life of a mortgage-related security is inaccurately predicted, the Fund may not be able to realize the rate of return it expected.

Derivatives Risk: Investments in derivatives may be illiquid, difficult to price, and leveraged so that small changes may produce disproportionate losses for the Fund, and may be subject to counterparty risk to a greater degree than more traditional investments.

Leverage Risk: To the extent the Fund uses leveraging techniques, its net asset value (“NAV”) may be more volatile because leverage tends to exaggerate the effect of changes in interest rates and any increase or decrease in the value of the Fund’s investments.

Management Risk: The Fund is subject to management risk because it is an actively-managed investment fund. The Adviser will apply its investment techniques and risk analyses in making investment decisions, but there is no guarantee that its techniques will produce the intended results.

These risks are fully discussed in the Fund’s prospectus.

An Important Note About Historical Performance

The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate, so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance shown on the following pages represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance information shown. You may obtain performance information current to the most recent month-end by calling (800) 227-4618. Performance assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. For copies of our prospectus and/or summary prospectus, which contain this and other information, visit us online at www.alliancebernstein.com or contact your AllianceBernstein Investments representative. Please read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

 

4     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

Disclosures and Risks


HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE

 

 

        
THE FUND VS. ITS BENCHMARK
PERIODS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2014 (unaudited)
  NAV Returns      
  6 Months        12 Months       
AllianceBernstein
Taxable Multi-Sector Income Shares
    0.42%           1.47%     

 

Barclays U.S. Aggregate ex-Government
Bond Index
    2.54%           5.04%     
        

 

AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURNS AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2014 (unaudited)  
     NAV Returns  
  

1 Year

     1.47

Since Inception*

     2.78
  
SEC AVERAGE ANNUAL RETURNS
AS OF THE MOST RECENT CALENDAR QUARTER-END
SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 (unaudited)
       
     SEC Returns  
  

1 Year

     1.52

Since Inception*

     2.77

The Fund’s current prospectus fee table shows the fees and the total fund operating expenses as 0.00% because the Adviser does not charge any fees or expenses and reimburses or pays Fund operating expenses. Participants in a wrap fee program or other investment program eligible to invest in the Fund pay fees to the program sponsor and should review the program brochure or other literature provided by the sponsor for a discussion of fees and expenses charged.

 

*   Inception date: 9/15/2010.

See Disclosures, Risks and Note about Historical Performance on pages 3-4.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       5   

Historical Performance


EXPENSE EXAMPLE

(unaudited)

 

As a shareholder of the Fund, you may incur various ongoing non-operating and extraordinary costs. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.

The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period as indicated below.

Actual Expenses

The table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes

The table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed annual rate of return of 5% before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds by comparing this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads), or contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions. Therefore, the hypothetical example is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

 

     Beginning
Account Value
May 1, 2014
     Ending
Account Value
October 31, 2014
     Expenses Paid
During Period*
    Annualized
Expense Ratio*
 

Actual

   $ 1,000       $ 1,004.20       $ – 0  –      0.00

Hypothetical**

   $     1,000       $     1,025.21       $     – 0  –      0.00
*   Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Fund’s operating expenses are borne by the Adviser or its affiliates.

 

**   Assumes 5% annual return before expenses.

 

6     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

Expense Example


PORTFOLIO SUMMARY

OCTOBER 31, 2014 (unaudited)

 

PORTFOLIO STATISTICS

Net Assets ($mil): $145.7

 

LOGO

 

*   All data are as of October 31, 2014. The Fund’s security type breakdown is expressed as a percentage of total investments and may vary over time. The Fund also enters into derivative transactions, which may be used for hedging or investment purposes (see “Portfolio of Investments” section of the report for additional details).

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       7   

Portfolio Summary


PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS

October 31, 2014 (unaudited)

 

     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

CORPORATES - INVESTMENT GRADE – 57.8%

    

Industrial – 32.5%

    

Basic – 4.1%

    

BHP Billiton Finance USA Ltd.
1.875%, 11/21/16

   $ 1,175      $ 1,198,028   

Dow Chemical Co. (The)
2.50%, 2/15/16

     1,175        1,199,500   

Ecolab, Inc.
3.00%, 12/08/16

     1,145        1,188,520   

Glencore Funding LLC
1.70%, 5/27/16(a)

     1,200        1,207,851   

Monsanto Co.
0.437%, 11/07/16(b)

     130        129,896   

PPG Industries, Inc.
6.65%, 3/15/18

     330        380,228   

Rio Tinto Finance USA PLC
1.375%, 6/17/16

     625        629,699   
    

 

 

 
       5,933,722   
    

 

 

 

Capital Goods – 2.0%

    

Caterpillar Financial Services Corp. Series G
2.05%, 8/01/16

     1,180        1,206,959   

John Deere Capital Corp.
0.75%, 1/22/16

     435        436,049   

1.125%, 6/12/17

     700        698,238   

Republic Services, Inc.
3.80%, 5/15/18

     555        590,060   
    

 

 

 
       2,931,306   
    

 

 

 

Communications - Media – 4.1%

    

CBS Corp.
1.95%, 7/01/17

     555        562,585   

Cox Communications, Inc.
5.50%, 10/01/15

     1,230        1,284,166   

DirecTV Holdings LLC/DirecTV Financing Co., Inc.
2.40%, 3/15/17

     1,065        1,090,806   

NBCUniversal Enterprise, Inc.
0.768%, 4/15/16(a)(b)

     270        271,134   

NBCUniversal Media LLC
3.65%, 4/30/15

     755        766,885   

Time Warner Cable, Inc.
5.85%, 5/01/17

     890        983,577   

Time Warner, Inc.
3.15%, 7/15/15

     985        1,002,616   
    

 

 

 
       5,961,769   
    

 

 

 

Communications - Telecommunications – 2.7%

    

AT&T, Inc.
1.40%, 12/01/17

     1,035        1,031,795   

 

8     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

British Telecommunications PLC
1.625%, 6/28/16

   $ 990      $ 1,000,482   

Deutsche Telekom International Finance BV
2.25%, 3/06/17(a)

     1,170        1,195,391   

Verizon Communications, Inc.
2.00%, 11/01/16

     680        692,003   
    

 

 

 
       3,919,671   
    

 

 

 

Consumer Cyclical - Automotive – 1.2%

    

Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC
3.00%, 6/12/17

     1,155        1,190,867   

Volkswagen International Finance NV
1.125%, 11/18/16(a)

     600        601,142   
    

 

 

 
       1,792,009   
    

 

 

 

Consumer Cyclical - Retailers – 2.1%

    

CVS Health Corp.
3.25%, 5/18/15

     1,165        1,182,086   

Kohl’s Corp.
6.25%, 12/15/17

     1,000        1,128,245   

Walgreen Co.
1.00%, 3/13/15

     790        791,244   
    

 

 

 
       3,101,575   
    

 

 

 

Consumer Non-Cyclical – 8.8%

    

AbbVie, Inc.
1.75%, 11/06/17

     1,195        1,198,366   

Actavis Funding SCS
1.30%, 6/15/17(a)

     1,150        1,132,434   

Allergan, Inc./United States
1.35%, 3/15/18

     401        386,229   

Altria Group, Inc.
4.125%, 9/11/15

     955        983,283   

Amgen, Inc.
2.125%, 5/15/17

     1,175        1,198,336   

Anheuser-Busch InBev Finance, Inc.
0.80%, 1/15/16

     1,205        1,207,070   

Bayer US Finance LLC
1.50%, 10/06/17(a)

     1,250        1,254,509   

Bunge Ltd. Finance Corp.
4.10%, 3/15/16

     560        583,192   

Express Scripts Holding Co.
2.65%, 2/15/17

     1,225        1,260,215   

Kraft Foods Group, Inc.
1.625%, 6/04/15

     1,085        1,091,653   

Kroger Co. (The)
3.90%, 10/01/15

     1,135        1,166,831   

Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.20%, 5/01/15-3/01/16

     1,235        1,258,393   

Whirlpool Corp.
1.35%, 3/01/17

     138        137,599   
    

 

 

 
       12,858,110   
    

 

 

 

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       9   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Energy – 3.8%

    

Anadarko Petroleum Corp.
5.95%, 9/15/16

   $ 1,025      $ 1,113,824   

Enterprise Products Operating LLC
3.20%, 2/01/16

     764        786,310   

Series L
6.30%, 9/15/17

     215        244,613   

Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP
3.50%, 3/01/16

     501        516,164   

Marathon Petroleum Corp.
3.50%, 3/01/16

     959        989,822   

Transocean, Inc.
4.95%, 11/15/15

     1,240        1,286,301   

Williams Partners LP
3.80%, 2/15/15

     570        574,700   
    

 

 

 
       5,511,734   
    

 

 

 

Technology – 3.7%

    

Apple, Inc.
1.05%, 5/05/17

     1,030        1,029,912   

Cisco Systems, Inc.
0.514%, 3/03/17(b)

     1,210        1,211,398   

Hewlett-Packard Co.
2.65%, 6/01/16

     1,050        1,075,871   

Kla-tencor Corp.
2.375%, 11/01/17

     1,500        1,507,290   

Xerox Corp.
2.95%, 3/15/17

     510        527,707   
    

 

 

 
       5,352,178   
    

 

 

 
       47,362,074   
    

 

 

 
    

Financial Institutions – 23.7%

    

Banking – 18.6%

    

Abbey National Treasury Services
PLC/London
4.00%, 4/27/16

     805        841,608   

ABN AMRO Bank NV
1.375%, 1/22/16(a)

     750        755,212   

American Express Credit Corp.
1.55%, 9/22/17

     1,357        1,361,059   

Bank of America Corp.
1.25%, 1/11/16

     1,605        1,612,250   

Barclays Bank PLC
3.90%, 4/07/15

     805        816,614   

BB&T Corp.
2.05%, 6/19/18

     595        599,224   

Branch Banking & Trust Co.
1.35%, 10/01/17

     710        708,209   

Capital One Bank USA NA
1.15%, 11/21/16

     1,045        1,043,589   

 

10     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Citigroup, Inc.
1.30%, 4/01/16

   $ 1,015      $ 1,019,588   

1.35%, 3/10/17

     335        334,990   

Fifth Third Bancorp
3.625%, 1/25/16

     515        532,301   

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)
1.60%, 11/23/15

     1,010        1,017,951   

Huntington National Bank (The)
1.30%, 11/20/16

     1,200        1,202,242   

ING Bank NV
1.375%, 3/07/16(a)

     910        916,520   

JPMorgan Chase & Co.
0.754%, 2/15/17(b)

     1,025        1,028,015   

3.15%, 7/05/16

     1,125        1,163,631   

Lloyds Bank PLC
4.875%, 1/21/16

     1,120        1,175,828   

Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.
1.45%, 3/07/18

     565        559,881   

Mizuho Bank Ltd.
0.659%, 4/16/17(a)(b)

     1,000        999,501   

1.70%, 9/25/17(a)

     300        300,263   

Morgan Stanley
1.75%, 2/25/16

     1,260        1,271,314   

PNC Bank NA
1.50%, 10/18/17

     1,350        1,352,575   

Royal Bank of Canada
0.561%, 1/23/17(b)

     1,615        1,619,301   

Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC
2.55%, 9/18/15

     1,174        1,190,773   

SunTrust Banks, Inc.
3.60%, 4/15/16

     1,140        1,184,819   

US Bancorp/MN
0.724%, 11/15/18(b)

     130        130,984   

US Bank, NA/Cincinnati OH
1.375%, 9/11/17

     1,200        1,202,161   

Wells Fargo & Co.
1.15%, 6/02/17

     1,100        1,096,569   
    

 

 

 
       27,036,972   
    

 

 

 

Insurance – 3.9%

    

American International Group, Inc.
5.45%, 5/18/17

     1,000        1,099,942   

Cigna Corp.
2.75%, 11/15/16

     1,230        1,269,701   

Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (The)
4.00%, 3/30/15

     1,155        1,170,703   

New York Life Global Funding
0.80%, 2/12/16(a)

     1,205        1,208,849   

Prudential Financial, Inc.
4.75%, 9/17/15

     945        977,583   
    

 

 

 
       5,726,778   
    

 

 

 

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       11   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

REITS – 1.2%

    

HCP, Inc.
3.75%, 2/01/16

   $ 763      $ 790,058   

Health Care REIT, Inc.
3.625%, 3/15/16

     757        784,049   

4.70%, 9/15/17

     215        233,738   
    

 

 

 
       1,807,845   
    

 

 

 
       34,571,595   
    

 

 

 

Utility – 1.6%

    

Electric – 1.6%

    

Constellation Energy Group, Inc.
4.55%, 6/15/15

     1,040        1,063,463   

Dominion Resources, Inc./VA
1.95%, 8/15/16

     1,250        1,269,306   
    

 

 

 
       2,332,769   
    

 

 

 

Total Corporates - Investment Grade
(cost $84,222,010)

       84,266,438   
    

 

 

 
    

INFLATION-LINKED SECURITIES – 14.4%

    

United States – 14.4%

    

U.S. Treasury Inflation Index
0.125%, 4/15/17 (TIPS)
(cost $21,126,365)

     20,630        20,952,782   
    

 

 

 
    

ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES – 10.5%

    

Credit Cards - Floating Rate – 4.1%

    

Barclays Dryrock Issuance Trust
Series 2014-2, Class A
0.493%, 3/16/20(b)

     1,000        1,000,000   

Cabela’s Credit Card Master Note Trust
Series 2012-2A, Class A2
0.633%, 6/15/20(a)(b)

     1,000        1,006,883   

Chase Issuance Trust
Series 2012-A2, Class A2
0.423%, 5/15/19(b)

     1,000        1,002,646   

Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust
Series 2013-A7, Class A7
0.582%, 9/10/20(b)

     1,000        1,004,093   

Discover Card Execution Note Trust
Series 2014-A1, Class A1
0.583%, 7/15/21(b)

     1,000        999,412   

World Financial Network Credit Card Master Trust
Series 2014-A, Class A
0.533%, 12/15/19(b)

     1,000        1,001,800   
    

 

 

 
       6,014,834   
    

 

 

 

Autos - Fixed Rate – 4.0%

    

Chrysler Capital Auto Receivables Trust
Series 2014-BA, Class A2
0.69%, 9/15/17(a)

     921        921,325   

 

12     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

Fifth Third Auto Trust
Series 2014-3, Class A4
1.47%, 5/17/21

   $ 839      $ 835,056   

Ford Credit Floorplan Master Owner Trust
Series 2014-1, Class A1
1.20%, 2/15/19

     1,000        1,000,671   

Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust
Series 2014-1, Class A3
1.10%, 9/15/19

     1,000        1,001,921   

Hertz Vehicle Financing LLC
Series 2010-1A, Class A2
3.74%, 2/25/17(a)

     1,000        1,031,649   

Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust
Series 2014-A, Class A2A
0.48%, 6/15/16

     1,004        1,003,997   
    

 

 

 
       5,794,619   
    

 

 

 

Autos - Floating Rate – 1.4%

    

GE Dealer Floorplan Master Note Trust
Series 2012-4, Class A
0.597%, 10/20/17(b)

     1,000        1,001,055   

Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust
Series 2014-2, Class A2B
0.473%, 7/17/17(b)

     1,000        999,568   
    

 

 

 
       2,000,623   
    

 

 

 

Credit Cards - Fixed Rate – 1.0%

    

American Express Credit Account Master Trust
Series 2014-2, Class A
1.26%, 1/15/20

     560        560,896   

World Financial Network Credit Card Master Trust
Series 2013-A, Class A
1.61%, 12/15/21

     1,000        996,202   
    

 

 

 
       1,557,098   
    

 

 

 

Total Asset-Backed Securities
(cost $15,369,640)

       15,367,174   
    

 

 

 
    

COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES – 8.7%

    

Non-Agency Fixed Rate CMBS – 7.7%

    

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust
Series 2013-GC17, Class A2
2.962%, 11/10/46

     1,000        1,034,889   

Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Certificates
Series 2013-CR10, Class A2
2.972%, 8/10/46

     1,050        1,088,489   

Series 2014-LC15, Class A2
2.84%, 4/10/47

     790        812,924   

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2013-CR6, Class A2
2.122%, 3/10/46

     1,000        1,012,284   

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       13   

Portfolio of Investments


     Principal
Amount
(000)
    U.S. $ Value  

 

 
    

GS Mortgage Securities Trust
Series 2014-GC20, Class A2
3.002%, 4/10/47

   $ 1,000      $ 1,036,485   

JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage
Securities Trust
Series 2013-C13, Class A2
2.665%, 1/15/46

     1,000        1,026,912   

Series 2013-C16, Class A2
3.07%, 12/15/46

     1,000        1,039,582   

JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust
Series 2013-C15, Class A2
2.977%, 11/15/45

     1,000        1,036,685   

Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust
Series 2013-C11, Class A2
3.085%, 8/15/46

     1,000        1,041,727   

Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust
Series 2006-C23, Class A5
5.416%, 1/15/45

     1,000        1,045,548   

WF-RBS Commercial Mortgage Trust
Series 2013-C16, Class A2
3.223%, 9/15/46

     1,000        1,046,933   
    

 

 

 
       11,222,458   
    

 

 

 

Non-Agency Floating Rate CMBS – 1.0%

    

JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage
Securities Trust
Series 2014-INN, Class A
1.073%, 6/15/29(a)(b)

     1,000        998,457   

Resource Capital Corp., Ltd.
Series 2014-CRE2, Class A
1.207%, 4/15/32(a)(b)

     425        424,500   
    

 

 

 
       1,422,957   
    

 

 

 

Total Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities
(cost $12,663,599)

       12,645,415   
    

 

 

 
    

GOVERNMENTS - TREASURIES – 5.5%

    

United States – 5.5%

    

U.S. Treasury Notes
0.875%, 7/15/17
(cost $7,926,182)

     7,950        7,961,798   
    

 

 

 
     Shares        

SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS – 1.6%

    

Investment Companies – 1.6%

    

AllianceBernstein Fixed-Income Shares, Inc. – Government STIF Portfolio, 0.07%(c)(d)
(cost $2,259,153)

     2,259,153        2,259,153   
    

 

 

 

Total Investments – 98.5%
(cost $143,566,949)

       143,452,760   

Other assets less liabilities – 1.5%

       2,251,554   
    

 

 

 

Net Assets – 100.0%

     $ 145,704,314   
    

 

 

 

 

14     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

Portfolio of Investments


 

 

CENTRALLY CLEARED CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS (see Note C)

 

Clearing Broker/(Exchange) &
Referenced Obligation
  Fixed
Rate
(Pay)
Receive
    Implied
Credit
Spread at
October 31,
2014
    Notional
Amount
(000)
    Market
Value
    Unrealized
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
 

Sale Contracts

         

Citigroup Global Markets, Inc./(CME):

         

CDX-NAIG Series 22, 5 Year Index, 06/20/2019*

    1.00     0.56   $     20,000      $ 418,212      $ 112,805   

CDX-NAIG Series 22, 5 Year Index, 06/20/2019*

    1.00        0.56        3,250        67,960        18,727   

CDX-NAIG Series 22, 5 Year Index, 06/20/2019*

    1.00        0.56        2,500        52,277        11,024   

Citigroup Global Markets, Inc./(INTRCONX):

         

CDX-NAIG Series 23, 5 Year Index, 12/20/2019*

    1.00        0.64        2,500        47,208        18,042   
       

 

 

   

 

 

 
        $     585,657      $     160,598   
       

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*   Termination date

 

(a)   Security is exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities are considered liquid and may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At October 31, 2014, the aggregate market value of these securities amounted to $14,225,620 or 9.8% of net assets.

 

(b)   Floating Rate Security. Stated interest rate was in effect at October 31, 2014.

 

(c)   To obtain a copy of the fund’s financial statements, please go to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov, or call AllianceBernstein at (800) 227-4618.

 

(d)   Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. The rate shown represents the 7-day yield as of period end.

Glossary:

CDX-NAIG North American Investment Grade Credit Default Swap Index

CMBS Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities

CME Chicago Mercantile Exchange

INTRCONX Inter-Continental Exchange

REIT Real Estate Investment Trust

TIPS Treasury Inflation Protected Security

See notes to financial statements.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       15   

Portfolio of Investments


STATEMENT OF ASSETS & LIABILITIES

October 31, 2014 (unaudited)

 

Assets   

Investments in securities, at value

  

Unaffiliated issuers (cost $141,307,796)

   $ 141,193,607   

Affiliated issuers (cost $2,259,153)

     2,259,153   

Cash

     581   

Due from broker

     486,517 (a) 

Receivable for shares of beneficial interest sold

     2,871,160   

Interest and dividend receivable

     601,603   

Receivable for variation margin on exchange-traded derivatives

     22,202   
  

 

 

 

Total assets

     147,434,823   
  

 

 

 
Liabilities   

Payable for investment securities purchased

     1,503,140   

Payable for shares of beneficial interest redeemed

     134,229   

Dividends payable

     93,140   
  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     1,730,509   
  

 

 

 

Net Assets

   $ 145,704,314   
  

 

 

 
Composition of Net Assets   

Shares of beneficial interest, at par

   $ 146   

Additional paid-in capital

     146,289,747   

Distributions in excess of net investment income

     (172,791

Accumulated net realized loss on investment transactions

     (459,197

Net unrealized appreciation on investments

     46,409   
  

 

 

 
   $     145,704,314   
  

 

 

 

Net Asset Value Per Share – unlimited shares of beneficial interest authorized, $.00001 par value (based on 14,624,008 common shares outstanding)

   $ 9.96   
  

 

 

 

 

(a)   Represents amounts on deposit at the broker as collateral for open derivative contracts.

See notes to financial statements.

 

16     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

Statement of Assets & Liabilities


STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Six Months Ended October 31, 2014 (unaudited)

 

Investment Income    

Interest

  $     570,720     

Dividends—Affiliated issuers

    488     
 

 

 

   

Total investment income

    $ 571,208   
   

 

 

 
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investment Transactions    

Net realized gain on:

   

Investment transactions

      35,357   

Swaps

      73,943   

Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of:

   

Investments

      (201,978

Swaps

      127,032   
   

 

 

 

Net gain on investment transactions

      34,354   
   

 

 

 

Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations

    $     605,562   
   

 

 

 

See notes to financial statements.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       17   

Statement of Operations


STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

 

 

     Six Months Ended
October 31, 2014
(unaudited)
    Year Ended
April 30,
2014
 
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
from Operations
    

Net investment income

   $ 571,208      $ 568,928   

Net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions

     109,300        (499,799

Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments

     (74,946     82,010   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase in net assets from operations

     605,562        151,139   
Dividends to Shareholders from     

Net investment income

     (655,025     (634,567
Transactions in Shares of Beneficial Interest     

Net increase

     40,595,969        37,849,966   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total increase

     40,546,506        37,366,538   
Net Assets     

Beginning of period

     105,157,808        67,791,270   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of period (including distributions in excess of net investment income of ($172,791) and ($88,974), respectively)

   $     145,704,314      $     105,157,808   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

18     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

Statement of Changes in Net Assets


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

October 31, 2014 (unaudited)

 

NOTE A

Significant Accounting Policies

AllianceBernstein Corporate Shares (the “Trust”) was organized as a Massachusetts business trust under the laws of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts by an Agreement and Declaration of Trust dated January 26, 2004. The Trust is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as an open-end, diversified management investment company. The Trust operates as a “series” company currently offering three separate portfolios: AllianceBernstein Corporate Income Shares, AllianceBernstein Municipal Income Shares and AllianceBernstein Taxable Multi-Sector Income Shares (the “Portfolio”). Each Portfolio is considered to be a separate entity for financial reporting and tax purposes. This report relates only to AllianceBernstein Taxable Multi-Sector Income Shares.

Shares of the Portfolio are offered exclusively to holders of accounts established under wrap-fee programs sponsored and maintained by certain registered investment advisers approved by AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”). The Portfolio’s shares may be purchased at the relevant net asset value without a sales charge or other fee. The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) which require management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Portfolio.

1. Security Valuation

Portfolio securities are valued at their current market value determined on the basis of market quotations or, if market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable, at “fair value” as determined in accordance with procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”).

In general, the market values of securities which are readily available and deemed reliable are determined as follows: securities listed on a national securities exchange (other than securities listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. (“NASDAQ”)) or on a foreign securities exchange are valued at the last sale price at the close of the exchange or foreign securities exchange. If there has been no sale on such day, the securities are valued at the last traded price from the previous day. Securities listed on more than one exchange are valued by reference to the principal exchange on which the securities are traded; securities listed only on NASDAQ are valued in accordance with the NASDAQ Official Closing Price; listed or over the counter (“OTC”) market put or call options are valued at the mid level between the current bid and ask prices. If either a current bid or current ask price is unavailable, the Adviser will have discretion to determine the best valuation (e.g. last trade price in the case of listed options);

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       19   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

open futures are valued using the closing settlement price or, in the absence of such a price, the most recent quoted bid price. If there are no quotations available for the day of valuation, the last available closing settlement price is used; U.S. government securities and other debt instruments having 60 days or less remaining until maturity are valued at amortized cost if their original maturity was 60 days or less. If the original term to maturity exceeded 60 days, the securities are valued by a pricing service, if a market price is available. If a market price is not available, the securities are valued by using amortized cost as of the 61st day prior to maturity. Fixed-income securities, including mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, may be valued on the basis of prices provided by a pricing service or at a price obtained from one or more of the major broker-dealers. In cases where broker-dealer quotes are obtained, the Adviser may establish procedures whereby changes in market yields or spreads are used to adjust, on a daily basis, a recently obtained quoted price on a security. Swaps and other derivatives are valued daily, primarily using independent pricing services, independent pricing models using market inputs, as well as third party broker-dealers or counterparties. Investment companies are valued at their net asset value each day.

Securities for which market quotations are not readily available (including restricted securities) or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value. Factors considered in making this determination may include, but are not limited to, information obtained by contacting the issuer, analysts, analysis of the issuer’s financial statements or other available documents. In addition, the Portfolio may use fair value pricing for securities primarily traded in non-U.S. markets because most foreign markets close well before the Portfolio values its securities at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time. The earlier close of these foreign markets gives rise to the possibility that significant events, including broad market moves, may have occurred in the interim and may materially affect the value of those securities.

2. Fair Value Measurements

In accordance with U.S. GAAP regarding fair value measurements, fair value is defined as the price that the Portfolio would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. U.S. GAAP establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability (including those valued based on their market values as described in Note A.1 above). Inputs may be observable or unobservable and refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Portfolio. Unobservable inputs reflect the Portfolio’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances. Each investment is assigned a

 

20     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

level based upon the observability of the inputs which are significant to the overall valuation. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized below.

 

   

Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical investments

   

Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)

   

Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolio’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

The fair value of debt instruments, such as bonds, and over-the-counter derivatives is generally based on market price quotations, recently executed market transactions (where observable) or industry recognized modeling techniques and are generally classified as Level 2. Pricing vendor inputs to Level 2 valuations may include quoted prices for similar investments in active markets, interest rate curves, coupon rates, currency rates, yield curves, option adjusted spreads, default rates, credit spreads and other unique security features in order to estimate the relevant cash flows which are then discounted to calculate fair values. If these inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value, these investments will be classified as Level 3. In addition, non-agency rated investments are classified as Level 3.

Valuations of mortgage-backed or other asset-backed securities, by pricing vendors, are based on both proprietary and industry recognized models and discounted cash flow techniques. Significant inputs to the valuation of these instruments are value of the collateral, the rates and timing of delinquencies, the rates and timing of prepayments, and default and loss expectations, which are driven in part by housing prices for residential mortgages. Significant inputs are determined based on relative value analyses, which incorporate comparisons to instruments with similar collateral and risk profiles, including relevant indices. Mortgage and asset-backed securities for which management has collected current observable data through pricing services are generally categorized within Level 2. Those investments for which current observable data has not been provided are classified as Level 3.

Other fixed income investments, including non-U.S. government and corporate debt, are generally valued using quoted market prices, if available, which are typically impacted by current interest rates, maturity dates and any perceived credit risk of the issuer. Additionally, in the absence of quoted market prices, these inputs are used by pricing vendors to derive a valuation based upon industry or proprietary models which incorporate issuer specific data with relevant yield/spread comparisons with more widely quoted bonds with similar key characteristics. Those investments for which there are observable inputs are classified as Level 2. Where the inputs are not observable, the investments are classified as Level 3.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       21   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

The following table summarizes the valuation of the Portfolio’s investments by the above fair value hierarchy levels as of October 31, 2014:

 

Investments in Securities:

  Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  

Assets:

       

Corporates – Investment Grade

  $ – 0  –    $ 84,266,438      $ – 0  –    $ 84,266,438   

Inflation-Linked Securities

    – 0 –      20,952,782        – 0 –      20,952,782   

Asset-Backed Securities

    – 0 –      15,367,174        – 0 –      15,367,174   

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities

    – 0 –      12,645,415        – 0 –      12,645,415   

Governments – Treasuries

    – 0 –      7,961,798        – 0 –      7,961,798   

Short-Term Investments

    2,259,153        – 0  –      – 0 –      2,259,153   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Investments in Securities

    2,259,153        141,193,607        – 0 –      143,452,760   

Other Financial Instruments*:

       

Assets:

       

Centrally Cleared Credit Default Swaps

    – 0 –      160,598        – 0 –      160,598

Liabilities

    – 0  –      – 0  –      – 0 –      – 0 – 
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total^

  $   2,259,153      $   141,354,205      $   – 0  –    $   143,613,358   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*   Other financial instruments are derivative instruments, such as futures, forwards and swaps, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation/depreciation on the instrument.

 

#   Only variation margin receivable/payable at period end is reported within the statement of assets and liabilities. This amount reflects cumulative appreciation/(depreciation) of exchange-traded derivatives as reported in the portfolio of investments.

 

^   There were no transfers between any levels during the reporting period.

The Portfolio recognizes all transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy assuming the financial instruments were transferred at the beginning of the reporting period.

The Adviser has established a Valuation Committee (the “Committee”) which is responsible for overseeing the pricing and valuation of all securities held in the Portfolio. The Committee operates under pricing and valuation policies and procedures established by the Adviser and approved by the Board, including pricing policies which set forth the mechanisms and processes to be employed on a daily basis to implement these policies and procedures. In particular, the pricing policies describe how to determine market quotations for securities and other instruments. The Committee’s responsibilities include: 1) fair value and liquidity determinations (and oversight of any third parties to whom any responsibility for fair value and liquidity determinations is delegated), and 2) regular monitoring of the Adviser’s pricing and valuation policies and procedures and modification or enhancement of these policies and procedures (or recommendation of the modification of these policies and procedures) as the Committee believes appropriate.

The Committee is also responsible for monitoring the implementation of the pricing policies by the Adviser’s Pricing Group (the “Pricing Group”) and a third party which performs certain pricing functions in accordance with the

 

22     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

pricing policies. The Pricing Group is responsible for the oversight of the third party on a day-to-day basis. The Committee and the Pricing Group perform a series of activities to provide reasonable assurance of the accuracy of prices including: 1) periodic vendor due diligence meetings, review of methodologies, new developments and processes at vendors, 2) daily comparison of security valuation versus prior day for all securities that exceeded established thresholds, and 3) daily review of unpriced, stale, and variance reports with exceptions reviewed by senior management and the Committee.

In addition, several processes outside of the pricing process are used to monitor valuation issues including: 1) performance and performance attribution reports are monitored for anomalous impacts based upon benchmark performance, and 2) portfolio managers review all portfolios for performance and analytics (which are generated using the Adviser’s prices).

3. Taxes

It is the Portfolio’s policy to meet the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute all of its investment company taxable income and net realized gains, if any, to shareholders. Therefore, no provisions for federal income or excise taxes are required.

In accordance with U.S. GAAP requirements regarding accounting for uncertainties in income taxes, management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken or expected to be taken on federal and state income tax returns for all open tax years (all years since inception of the Portfolio’s) and has concluded that no provision for income tax is required in the Portfolio’s financial statements.

4. Investment Income and Investment Transactions

Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date or as soon as the Portfolio is informed of the dividend. Interest income is accrued daily. Investment transactions are accounted for on the date the securities are purchased or sold. Investment gains or losses are determined on the identified cost basis. The Portfolio amortizes premiums and accretes discounts as adjustments to interest income.

5. Dividends and Distributions

Dividends and distributions to shareholders, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income dividends and capital gains distributions are determined in accordance with federal tax regulations and may differ from those determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. To the extent these differences are permanent, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts based on their federal tax basis treatment; temporary differences do not require such reclassification.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       23   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

NOTE B

Advisory Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates

Under the terms of the Advisory Agreement, the Portfolio pays no advisory fee to the Adviser and the Adviser reimburses or pays for the Portfolio’s operating expenses. The Portfolio is an integral part of separately managed accounts in wrap-fee programs and other investment programs. Typically, participants in these programs pay a fee to their investment adviser for all costs and expenses of the separately managed account, including costs and expenses associated with the Portfolio, and a fee is paid by their investment adviser to the Adviser. The Adviser serves as investment manager and adviser of the Portfolio and continuously furnishes an investment program for the Portfolio and manages, supervises and conducts the affairs of the Portfolio, subject to the supervisions of the Portfolio’s Board. The Advisory Agreement provides that the Adviser or an affiliate will furnish, or pay the expenses of the Portfolio for, office space, facilities and equipment, services of executive and other personnel of the Portfolio and certain administrative services.

The Portfolio has entered into a Distribution Agreement with AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc., the Portfolio’s principal underwriter (the “Underwriter”), to permit the Underwriter to distribute the Portfolio’s shares, which are sold at their net asset value without any sales charge. The Portfolio does not pay a fee for this service. The Underwriter is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Adviser.

AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc. (“ABIS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Adviser, acts as the Portfolio’s registrar, transfer agent and dividend-disbursing agent. ABIS registers the transfer, issuance and redemption of Portfolio shares and disburses dividends and other distributions to Portfolio shareholders. The Portfolio does not pay a fee for this service.

The Portfolio may invest in the AllianceBernstein Fixed-Income Shares, Inc.—Government STIF Portfolio (“Government STIF Portfolio”), an open-end management investment company managed by the Adviser. The Government STIF Portfolio is offered as a cash management option to mutual funds and other institutional accounts of the Adviser, and is not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The Government STIF Portfolio pays no investment management fees but does bear its own expenses. A summary of the Portfolio’s transactions in shares of the Government STIF Portfolio for the six months ended October 31, 2014 is as follows:

 

Market Value

April 30, 2014

(000)

    Purchases
at Cost
(000)
    Sales
Proceeds
(000)
    Market Value
October 31, 2014
(000)
    Dividend
Income
(000)
 
$     3,564      $     40,340      $     41,645      $     2,259      $     – 0 – (a) 

 

(a)   

Amount is less than $500.

 

24     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

Brokerage commissions paid on investment transactions for the six months ended October 31, 2014 amounted to $0, of which $0 and $0, respectively, was paid to Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. LLC and Sanford C. Bernstein Limited, affiliates of the Adviser.

NOTE C

Investment Transactions

Purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term investments) for the six months ended October 31, 2014 were as follows:

 

     Purchases      Sales  

Investment securities (excluding
U.S. government securities)

   $     35,383,395       $ 1,006,994   

U.S. government securities

     39,235,301             25,172,983   

The cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, gross unrealized appreciation and unrealized depreciation are as follows:

 

Gross unrealized appreciation

   $ 195,428   

Gross unrealized depreciation

     (309,617
  

 

 

 

Net unrealized depreciation

   $     (114,189
  

 

 

 

1. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Portfolio may use derivatives in an effort to earn income and enhance returns, to replace more traditional direct investments, to obtain exposure to otherwise inaccessible markets (collectively, “investment purposes”), or to hedge or adjust the risk profile of its portfolio.

The principal types of derivatives utilized by the Portfolio, as well as the methods in which they may be used are:

 

   

Swaps

The Portfolio may enter into swaps to hedge its exposure to interest rates, credit risk, or currencies. The Portfolio may also enter into swaps for non-hedging purposes as a means of gaining market exposures, including by making direct investments in foreign currencies. A swap is an agreement that obligates two parties to exchange a series of cash flows at specified intervals based upon or calculated by reference to changes in specified prices or rates for a specified amount of an underlying asset. The payment flows are usually netted against each other, with the difference being paid by one party to the other. In addition, collateral may be pledged or received by the Portfolio in accordance with the terms of the respective swaps to provide value and recourse to the Portfolio or its counterparties in the event of default, bankruptcy or insolvency by one of the parties to the swap.

Risks may arise as a result of the failure of the counterparty to the swap to comply with the terms of the swap. The loss incurred by the failure of a

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       25   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

counterparty is generally limited to the net interim payment to be received by the Portfolio, and/or the termination value at the end of the contract. Therefore, the Portfolio considers the creditworthiness of each counterparty to a swap in evaluating potential counterparty risk. This risk is mitigated by having a netting arrangement between the Portfolio and the counterparty and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the Portfolio to cover the Portfolio’s exposure to the counterparty. Additionally, risks may arise from unanticipated movements in interest rates or in the value of the underlying securities. The Portfolio accrues for the interim payments on swaps on a daily basis, with the net amount recorded within unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swaps on the statement of assets and liabilities, where applicable. Once the interim payments are settled in cash, the net amount is recorded as realized gain/(loss) on swaps on the statement of operations, in addition to any realized gain/(loss) recorded upon the termination of swaps. Upfront premiums paid or received are recognized as cost or proceeds on the statement of assets and liabilities and are amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the contract. Amortized upfront premiums are included in net realized gain/(loss) from swaps on the statement of operations. Fluctuations in the value of swaps are recorded as a component of net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation of swaps on the statement of operations.

Certain standardized swaps, including certain interest rate swaps and credit default swaps, are (or soon will be) subject to mandatory central clearing. Cleared swaps are transacted through futures commission merchants (“FCMs”) that are members of central clearinghouses, with the clearinghouse serving as central counterparty, similar to transactions in futures contracts. Centralized clearing will be required for additional categories of swaps on a phased-in basis based on requirements published by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

At the time the Portfolio enters into a centrally cleared swap, the Portfolio deposits and maintains as collateral an initial margin with the broker, as required by the exchange on which the transaction is effected. Such amount is shown as due from broker on the statement of assets and liabilities. Pursuant to the contract, the Portfolio agrees to receive from or pay to the broker an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in the value of the contract. Such receipts or payments are known as variation margin and are recorded by the Portfolio as unrealized gains or losses. Risks may arise from the potential of a counterparty to meet the terms of the contract. The credit/counterparty risk for swaps cleared through a central clearinghouse exchange is generally less than privately negotiated swaps, since the clearinghouse, which is the issuer or counterparty to each exchange-traded swap, has robust risk mitigation standards, including the requirement to provide initial and variation margin. When the contract is closed, the

 

26     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

Portfolio records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the time it was closed.

Credit Default Swaps:

The Portfolio may enter into credit default swaps, including to manage its exposure to the market or certain sectors of the market, to reduce its risk exposure to defaults by corporate and sovereign issuers held by the Portfolio, or to create exposure to corporate or sovereign issuers to which it is not otherwise exposed. The Portfolio may purchase credit protection (“Buy Contract”) or provide credit protection (“Sale Contract”) on the referenced obligation of the credit default swap. During the term of the swap, the Portfolio receives/(pays) fixed payments from/(to) the respective counterparty, calculated at the agreed upon rate applied to the notional amount. If the Portfolio is a buyer/(seller) of protection and a credit event occurs, as defined under the terms of the swap, the Portfolio will either (i) receive from the seller/(pay to the buyer) of protection an amount equal to the notional amount of the swap (the “Maximum Payout Amount”) and deliver/(take delivery of) the referenced obligation or (ii) receive/(pay) a net settlement amount in the form of cash or securities equal to the notional amount of the swap less the recovery value of the referenced obligation.

In certain circumstances Maximum Payout Amounts may be partially offset by recovery values of the respective referenced obligations, upfront premium received upon entering into the agreement, or net amounts received from settlement of buy protection credit default swaps entered into by the Portfolio for the same reference obligation with the same counterparty. As of October 31, 2014, the Portfolio did not have Buy Contracts outstanding with respect to the same referenced obligation and same counterparty for its Sale Contracts outstanding.

Credit default swaps may involve greater risks than if a Portfolio had invested in the referenced obligation directly. Credit default swaps are subject to general market risk, liquidity risk, counterparty risk and credit risk. If the Portfolio is a buyer of protection and no credit event occurs, it will lose the payments it made to its counterparty. If the Portfolio is a seller of protection and a credit event occurs, the value of the referenced obligation received by the Portfolio coupled with the periodic payments previously received, may be less than the Maximum Payout Amount it pays to the buyer, resulting in a net loss to the Portfolio.

During the six months ended October 31, 2014, the Portfolio held credit default swaps for non-hedging purposes.

Implied credit spreads over U.S. Treasuries of comparable maturity utilized in determining the market value of credit default swaps on issuers as of period end are disclosed in the portfolio of investments. The implied spreads serve as an indicator of the current status of the payment/performance risk and typically reflect the likelihood of default by the issuer of the referenced obligation. The implied credit spread of a particular reference obligation also reflects the cost of buying/selling protection and may reflect upfront

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       27   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

payments required to be made to enter into the agreement. Widening credit spreads typically represent a deterioration of the referenced obligation’s credit soundness and greater likelihood of default or other credit event occurring as defined under the terms of the agreement. A credit spread identified as “Defaulted” indicates a credit event has occurred for the referenced obligation.

The Portfolio typically enters into International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Master Agreements (“ISDA Master Agreement”) or similar master agreements (collectively, “Master Agreements”) with its OTC derivative contract counterparties in order to, among other things, reduce its credit risk to counterparties. ISDA Master Agreements include provisions for general obligations, representations, collateral and events of default or termination. Under an ISDA Master Agreement, the Portfolio typically may offset with the counterparty certain derivative financial instrument’s payables and/or receivables with collateral held and/or posted and create one single net payment (close-out netting) in the event of default or termination.

Various Master Agreements govern the terms of certain transactions with counterparties, including transactions such as exchange-traded derivative transactions, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements. These Master Agreements typically attempt to reduce the counterparty risk associated with such transactions by specifying credit protection mechanisms and providing standardization that improves legal certainty. Cross-termination provisions under Master Agreements typically provide that a default in connection with one transaction between the Portfolio and a counterparty gives the non-defaulting party the right to terminate any other transactions in place with the defaulting party to create one single net payment due to/due from the defaulting party. In the event of a default by a Master Agreements counterparty, the return of collateral with market value in excess of the Portfolio’s net liability, held by the defaulting party, may be delayed or denied.

The Portfolio Master Agreements may contain provisions for early termination of OTC derivative transactions in the event the net assets of the Portfolio decline below specific levels (“net asset contingent features”). If these levels are triggered, the Portfolio counterparty has the right to terminate such transaction and require the Portfolio to pay or receive a settlement amount in connection with the terminated transaction. For additional details, please refer to netting arrangements by counterparty tables below.

At October 31, 2014, the Portfolio had entered into the following derivatives:

 

     

Asset Derivatives

   

Liability Derivatives

Derivative Type

  

Statement of
Assets and
Liabilities
Location

  Fair Value    

Statement of
Assets and
Liabilities
Location

  Fair Value

Credit contracts

  

Receivable/Payable

for variation margin

on exchange-traded

derivatives

  $     160,598    
    

 

 

     

 

Total

     $     160,598       
    

 

 

     

 

 

28     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

 

*   Only variation margin receivable/payable at period end is reported within the statement of assets and liabilities. This amount reflects cumulative appreciation/(depreciation) of exchange-traded derivatives as reported in the portfolio of investments.

The effect of derivative instruments on the statement of operations for the six months ended October 31, 2014:

 

Derivative Type

   Location of Gain
or (Loss) on
Derivatives
  Realized Gain
or (Loss) on
Derivatives
    Change in
Unrealized
Appreciation or
(Depreciation)
 

Credit contracts

   Net realized gain (loss)
on swaps; Net
change in unrealized
appreciation/
depreciation of
swaps
  $     73,943      $     127,032   
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     $ 73,943      $ 127,032   
    

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table represents the volume of the Portfolio’s derivative transactions during the six months ended October 31, 2014:

 

Centrally Cleared Credit Default Swaps:

  

Average notional amount of sale contracts

   $     23,892,857   

For financial reporting purposes, the Portfolio does not offset derivative assets and derivative liabilities that are subject to netting arrangements in the statement of assets and liabilities.

All derivatives held at period end were subject to netting arrangements. The following table presents the Portfolio’s derivative assets and liabilities by counterparty net of amounts available for offset under Master Agreements (“MA”) and net of the related collateral received/pledged by the Portfolio as of October 31, 2014:

 

Counterparty   Derivative
Assets
Subject
to a MA
    Derivative
Available for
Offset
    Cash
Collateral
Received
    Security
Collateral
Received
    Net
Amount of
Derivatives
Assets
 

Exchange-Traded Derivatives:

         

Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.*

  $ 22,202      $ – 0  –    $ – 0  –    $ – 0  –    $ 22,202   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $   22,202      $   – 0  –    $   – 0  –    $   – 0  –    $   22,202   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

*   Cash has been posted for initial margin requirements for exchange traded derivatives outstanding at October 31, 2014.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       29   

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

NOTE D

Shares of Beneficial Interest

Transactions in shares of beneficial interest were as follows:

 

            
     Shares         Amount      
     Six Months Ended
October 31, 2014
(unaudited)
    Year Ended
April 30,
2014
        Six Months Ended
October 31, 2014
(unaudited)
    Year Ended
April 30,
2014
     
  

 

 

   
Class A             

Shares sold

     4,997,880        13,235,304        $ 49,829,254      $ 131,658,197     

 

   

Shares redeemed

     (926,040     (9,483,472       (9,233,285     (93,808,231  

 

   

Net increase

     4,071,840        3,751,832        $ 40,595,969      $ 37,849,966     

 

   

NOTE E

Risks Involved in Investing in the Portfolio

Interest Rate Risk and Credit Risk—Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in interest rates will affect the value of the Portfolio’s investments in fixed-income debt securities such as bonds or notes. Increases in interest rates may cause the value of the Portfolio’s investments to decline. Credit risk is the risk that the issuer or guarantor of a debt security, or the counterparty to a derivative contract, will be unable or unwilling to make timely principal and/or interest payments, or to otherwise honor its obligations. The degree of risk for a particular security may be reflected in its credit rating. Credit risk is greater for medium quality and lower-rated securities. Lower-rated debt securities and similar unrated securities (commonly known as “junk bonds”) have speculative elements or are predominantly speculative risks.

Liquidity Risk—Liquidity risk exists when particular investments are difficult to purchase or sell, possibly preventing the Portfolio from selling out of these illiquid or relatively less liquid securities at an advantageous price. Causes of liquidity risk may include low trading volume, lack of a market maker, a large position, heavy redemptions, or legal restrictions that limit or prevent a Portfolio from selling securities or closing derivative positions at desirable prices or opportune times. Over recent years, the capacity of dealers to make markets in fixed income securities has been outpaced by the growth in the size of the fixed income markets. Liquidity risk may be magnified in a rising interest rate environment, where the value and liquidity of fixed income securities generally go down. Derivatives and securities involving substantial market and credit risk tend to involve greater liquidity risk. To the extent a Portfolio invests in municipal securities, the Portfolio is subject to more liquidity risk because the market for municipal securities is generally smaller than many other markets. Illiquid securities and relatively less liquid securities may also be difficult to value.

Redemption Risk—A Portfolio may experience heavy redemptions that could cause the Portfolio to liquidate its assets at inopportune times or at a loss or depressed value, which could cause the value of your investment to decline.

 

30     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

Notes to Financial Statements


 

 

Indemnification Risk—In the ordinary course of business, the Portfolio enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Portfolio has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these indemnification provisions and expects the risk of loss thereunder to be remote. Therefore, the Portfolio has not accrued any liability in connection with these indemnification provisions.

NOTE F

Distributions to Shareholders

The tax character of distributions to be paid for the year ending April 30, 2015 will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year. The tax character of distributions paid during the fiscal years ended April 30, 2014 and April 30, 2013 were as follows:

 

     2014     2013  

Distributions paid from:

    

Ordinary income

   $ 634,567      $ 421,184   

Net long-term capital gains

     – 0  –      179,359   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total taxable distributions paid

   $     634,567      $     600,543   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

As of April 30, 2014, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:

 

Undistributed ordinary income

   $ 365,898   

Accumulated capital and other losses

     (545,363 )(a) 

Unrealized appreciation/(depreciation)

     (274,365 )(b) 
  

 

 

 

Total accumulated earnings/(deficit)

   $     (453,830 )(c) 
  

 

 

 

 

(a)   

As of April 30, 2014, the Portfolio had a net capital loss carryforward of $542,101. As of that date, the cumulative deferred loss on straddles was $3,262.

 

(b)   

The differences between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) are attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales and the tax treatment of swaps.

 

(c)   

The difference between book-basis and tax-basis components of accumulated earnings/ (deficit) is attributable primarily to dividends payable.

For tax purposes, net capital losses may be carried over to offset future capital gains, if any. Funds are permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an indefinite period, and such losses will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses. As of April 30, 2014, the Portfolio had a net short-term capital loss carryforward of $542,101 which may be carried forward for an indefinite period.

NOTE G

Subsequent Events

Management has evaluated subsequent events for possible recognition or disclosure in the financial statements through the date the financial statements are issued. Management has determined that there are no material events that would require disclosure in the Portfolio’s financial statements through this date.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       31   

Notes to Financial Statements


FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Selected Data For A Share Of Beneficial Interest Outstanding Throughout Each Period

 

    Six Months
Ended
October 31,
2014
    Year Ended April 30,     September 15,
2010(a) to
April 30,
2011
 
      2014     2013     2012    
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net asset value, beginning of period

    $  9.97        $  9.97        $  10.17        $  10.09        $  10.00   
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income From Investment Operations

         

Net investment income(b)

    .05        .10        .10        .32        .24   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

    (.01 )      .02       .15       .08        .09   
 

 

 

 

Net increase in net asset value from operations

    .04        .12        .25        .40        .33   
 

 

 

 

Less: Dividends and Distributions

         

Dividends from net investment income

    (.05     (.12     (.14     (.32     (.24

Distributions from net realized gain on investment transactions

    – 0  –      – 0  –      (.31     – 0  –      – 0  – 
 

 

 

 

Total dividends and distributions

    (.05     (.12     (.45     (.32     (.24
 

 

 

 

Net asset value, end of period

    $  9.96        $  9.97        $  9.97        $  10.17        $  10.09   
 

 

 

 

Total Return

         

Total investment return based on net asset value(c)

    .42  %      1.22  %      2.47  %      4.05  %      3.31  % 

Ratios/Supplemental Data

         

Net assets, end of period
(000’s omitted)

    $145,704        $105,158        $67,791        $10,174        $10,124   

Ratio to average net assets of:

         

Net investment income

    .89  %^      1.04  %      1.05  %      3.17  %      3.79  %^ 

Portfolio turnover rate

    22  %      150  %      66  %      156  %      10  % 

 

(a)   Commencement of operations.

 

(b)   Based on average shares outstanding.

 

(c)   Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of beneficial shares on the opening of the first day and a sale on the closing of the last day of each period reported. Dividends and distributions, if any, are assumed for purposes of this calculation, to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan. Total investment return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized.

 

  Due to timing of sales and repurchase of capital shares, the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) per share is not in accord with the Portfolio’s change in net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions for the period.

 

^   Annualized.

See notes to financial statements.

 

32     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

Financial Highlights


BOARD OF TRUSTEES

 

Marshall C. Turner, Jr.(1) , Chairman

John H. Dobkin(1)

Michael J. Downey(1)

William H. Foulk, Jr.(1)

D. James Guzy(1)

  

Nancy P. Jacklin(1)

Robert M. Keith, President and Chief Executive Officer

Garry L. Moody(1)

Earl D. Weiner(1)

OFFICERS

Philip L. Kirstein,
Senior Vice President and Independent Compliance Officer

Douglas J. Peebles(2),
Senior Vice President

Paul J. DeNoon(2), Vice President

Scott A. DiMaggio(2), Vice President

Shawn E. Keegan(2), Vice President

  

Greg J. Wilensky(2), Vice President

Emilie D. Wrapp, Secretary

Joseph J. Mantineo, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Phyllis J. Clarke, Controller

Vincent S. Noto, Chief Compliance Officer

 

Custodian and Accounting Agent

State Street Bank and Trust Company
State Street Corporation CCB/5
1 Iron Street
Boston, MA 02111

 

Principal Underwriter

AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc.
1345 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10105

 

Transfer Agent

AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 786003
San Antonio, TX 78278-6003
Toll-Free (800) 221-5672

  

Legal Counsel

Seward & Kissel LLP

One Battery Park Plaza

New York, NY 10004

 

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Ernst & Young LLP

5 Times Square

New York, NY 10036

 

(1)   Member of the Audit Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Independent Directors Committee.

 

(2)   The day-to-day management of, and investment decisions for, the Trust’s portfolio are made by the Adviser’s Core Fixed-Income Team. Messrs. Paul J. DeNoon, Scott A. DiMaggio, Shawn E. Keegan, Douglas J. Peebles and Greg J. Wilensky are the investment professionals primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Trust’s portfolio.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       33   

Board of Trustees


 

 

THE FOLLOWING IS NOT PART OF THE SHAREHOLDER REPORT OR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SUMMARY OF SENIOR OFFICER’S EVALUATION OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT1

The following is a summary of the evaluation of the Investment Advisory Agreement between AllianceBernstein L.P. (the “Adviser”) and AllianceBernstein Corporate Shares (the “Trust”) with respect to AllianceBernstein Taxable Multi-Sector Income Shares (the “Portfolio”).2 The evaluation of the Investment Advisory Agreement was prepared by Philip L. Kirstein, the Senior Officer of the Trust, for the Trustees of the Trust, as required by the September 1, 2004 Assurance of Discontinuance (“AoD”) between the Adviser and the New York State Attorney General (the “NYAG”). The Senior Officer’s evaluation of the Investment Advisory Agreement is not meant to diminish the responsibility or authority of the Board of Trustees to perform its duties pursuant to Section 15 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 Act (the “40 Act”) and applicable state law. The purpose of this summary is to provide shareholders with a synopsis of the independent evaluation of the reasonableness of the advisory fees proposed to be paid by the Portfolio which was provided to the Trustees in connection with their review of the proposed approval of the continuance of the Investment Advisory Agreement.

The Senior Officer’s evaluation considered the following factors:

 

  1. Advisory fees charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services;

 

  2. Advisory fees charged by other mutual fund companies for like services;

 

  3. Costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the advisory agreement, excluding any intra-corporate profit;

 

  4. Profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services;

 

  5. Possible economies of scale as the Portfolio grows larger; and

 

  6. Nature and quality of the Adviser’s services including the performance of the Portfolio.

These factors, with the exception of the first factor, are generally referred to as the “Gartenberg factors,” which were articulated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 1982. Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc., 694 F. 2d 923 (2d Cir. 1982). On March 30, 2010, the Supreme Court held the Gartenberg decision was correct in its basic formulation of what Section 36(b) requires: to face liability under Section 36(b), “an

 

1   The Senior Officer’s fee evaluation was completed on October 23, 2014 and discussed with the Board of Trustees on November 4-6, 2014.

 

2   Future references to the Portfolio do not include “AllianceBernstein.”

 

34     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES


 

 

investment adviser must charge a fee that is so disproportionately large that it bears no reasonable relationship to the services rendered and could not have been the product of arm’s length bargaining” Jones v. Harris Associates L.P., 130 S. Ct. 1418 (2010). In Jones, the Court stated the Gartenberg approach fully incorporates the correct understanding of fiduciary duty within the context of Section 36(b) and noted with approval that “Gartenberg insists that all relevant circumstances be taken into account” and “uses the range of fees that might result from arm’s-length bargaining as the benchmark for reviewing challenged fees.”3

PORTFOLIO’S EXEMPTION FROM ADVISORY FEES OR EXPENSES

The Portfolio pays no advisory fee to the Adviser for receiving the services to be provided pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement. The Portfolio is designed to serve the needs of providers of separately managed accounts (“SMAs”).4 Since SMA clients pay their wrap program provider a unitary fee for managing all investments of their portfolio, the Portfolio will not pay an advisory fee. The Adviser will also reimburse the Portfolio for all of its other operating expenses, except certain extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage costs and the interest on borrowed money.

The Portfolio is designed as a component of an institutional fixed-income mandate, Core Plus (“Core Plus SMA”), for SMA clients. Core Plus SMA is modeled on the Adviser’s U.S. Strategic Core Plus investment mandate. Core Plus SMA uses a 60% allocation to direct investments in individual U.S. Government/U.S. agency securities, including pass-thru agency mortgage-backed securities, or cash investments, complemented by a 40% allocation to the Portfolio in order to achieve the approximate exposures of the U.S. Strategic Core Plus investment mandate. The Portfolio’s role as a component of Core Plus SMA calls for the Portfolio to utilize leverage in certain circumstances.

The Portfolio’s net assets on September 30, 2014 are set forth below:

 

Portfolio   9/30/14
Net Assets ($MM)
Taxable Multi-Sector Income Shares   $    138.4

The Portfolio, which offers only one no-load class of shares, is distributed through its principal underwriter, AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (“ABI”). Since the Portfolio is reimbursed by the Adviser for its operating expenses, the Portfolio does not have a distribution plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 40 Act.

 

3   Jones v. Harris at 1427.

 

4   The wrap program providers that offer SMAs currently employ the Adviser as one of several investment managers, and compensate the Adviser on the basis of all SMA assets managed by it, which would include assets of Taxable Multi-Sector Income Shares.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       35   


 

 

 

I. ADVISORY FEES CHARGED TO INSTITUTIONAL AND OTHER CLIENTS

The advisory fees charged to investment companies which the Adviser manages and sponsors are normally higher than those charged to similar sized institutional accounts, including pension plans and sub-advised investment companies. The fee differential reflects, among other things, different services provided to such clients, and different liabilities assumed. Services provided by the Adviser to the Portfolio that are not provided to non-investment company clients include providing office space and personnel to serve as Fund Officers, who among other responsibilities make the certifications required under the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, and coordinating with and monitoring the Portfolio’s third party service providers such as Fund counsel, auditors, custodians, transfer agents and pricing services. The accounting, administrative, legal and compliance requirements for the Portfolio are more costly than those for institutional client assets due to the greater complexities and time required for investment companies. The Adviser also believes that it incurs substantial entrepreneurial risk when offering a new mutual fund since establishing a new mutual fund requires a large upfront investment and it may take a long time for the fund to achieve profitability since the fund must be priced to scale from inception in order to be competitive and assets are acquired one account at a time. In addition, managing the cash flow of an investment company may be more difficult than that of a stable pool of assets, such as an institutional account with little cash movement in either direction, particularly if the Portfolio is in net redemption and the Adviser is frequently forced to sell securities to raise cash for redemptions. However, managing a fund with positive cash flow may be easier at times than managing a stable pool of assets. Finally, in recent years, investment advisers have been sued by institutional clients and have suffered reputational damage both by the attendant publicity and outcomes other than complete victories. Accordingly, the legal and reputational risks associated with institutional accounts are greater than previously thought, although arguably still not equal to those related to the mutual fund industry.

Notwithstanding the Adviser’s view that managing an investment company is not comparable to managing other institutional accounts because the services provided are different, the Supreme Court has indicated consideration should be given to the advisory fees charged to institutional accounts with a similar investment style as the Portfolio.5 In addition to the AllianceBernstein Institutional fee schedule, set forth below are what would have been the effective

 

5   The Supreme Court stated that “courts may give such comparisons the weight that they merit in light of the similarities and differences between the services that the clients in question require, but the courts must be wary of inapt comparisons.” Among the significant differences the Supreme Court noted that may exist between services provided to mutual funds and institutional accounts are “higher marketing costs.” Jones v. Harris at 1428.

 

36     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES


 

 

advisory fee for the Portfolio had the AllianceBernstein Institutional fee schedule been applicable to the Portfolio and the Portfolio’s advisory fee based on September 30, 2014 net assets.6

 

Portfolio   Net Assets
9/30/14
($MM)
  AllianceBernstein (“AB”)
Institutional (“Inst.”)
Fee Schedule
  Effective
AB Inst.
Adv. Fee
    Portfolio
Advisory
Fee
Taxable Multi-Sector Income Shares   $138.4  

U.S. Strategic Core Plus 50 bp on 1st $30 million

20 bp on the balance

Minimum Account Size: $25 m

    0.265%      0.000%

The Adviser manages AllianceBernstein Intermediate Bond Fund, Inc. (“Intermediate Bond Fund, Inc.”), a retail mutual fund that has a somewhat similar investment style as the Portfolio.7 Set forth in the table below are the advisory fee schedule of the Intermediate Bond Fund, Inc. and what would have been the effective advisory fee of the Portfolio had the advisory fee schedule of the retail mutual fund been applicable to the Portfolio based on September 30, 2014 net assets:

 

Portfolio   AllianceBernstein
Mutual Funds
(“ABMF”)
  Fee Schedule   ABMF
Effective
Fee
Taxable Multi- Sector Income Shares   Intermediate Bond Fund, Inc.  

0.45% on first $2.5 billion

0.40% on next $2.5 billion

0.35% on the balance

  0.450%

The Adviser also manages Sanford C. Bernstein Fund II – Intermediate Duration Institutional Portfolio (“SCB II”), which has a somewhat similar investment style as the Portfolio. Set forth in the table below are SCB II’s advisory fee schedule and what would have been the effective fee of the Portfolio had SCB II’s advisory fee schedule been applicable to the Portfolio based on September 30, 2014 net assets:8

 

 

6   The Adviser has indicated that with respect to institutional accounts with assets greater than $300 million, it will negotiate a fee schedule. Discounts that are negotiated vary based upon each client relationship.

 

7   The advisory fee schedule of AllianceBernstein Intermediate Bond Fund, Inc. was affected by the December 2003 settlement between the Adviser and the NYAG. The NYAG related master fee schedule, implemented in January 2004, contemplates eight categories with almost all of the AllianceBernstein funds in each category having the same advisory fee schedule.

 

8   Although a part of the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds, SCB II’s advisory fee schedule was not affected by the Adviser’s settlement with the NYAG since its fee schedule had a lower breakpoint level ($1 billion) than the breakpoint level ($2.5 billion) of the High Income category of the NYAG related master schedule. The advisory fee schedule of the High Income category is as follows: 0.50% on the first $2.5 billion, 0.45% on the next $2.5 billion and 0.40% thereafter.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       37   


 

 

 

Portfolio   ABMF Fund   Fee Schedule   SCB Fund
Effective
Fee
Taxable Multi-Sector Income Shares   Sanford C. Bernstein Fund II – Intermediate Duration Institutional Portfolio9  

0.50% on 1st $1 billion

0.45% on the balance

  0.500%

The Adviser manages Sanford C. Bernstein Fund, Inc. (“SCB Fund”), an open-end management investment company. The Intermediate Duration Portfolio of SCB Fund has a somewhat similar investment style as the Portfolio. Set forth below are Intermediate Duration Portfolio’s advisory fee schedule and what would have been the effective advisory fee of the Portfolio had the fee schedule of Intermediate Duration Portfolio been applicable to the Portfolio based on September 30, 2014 net assets:

 

Portfolio   SCB Fund
Portfolio
  Fee Schedule   SCB Fund
Effective
Fee
Taxable Multi- Sector Income Shares   Intermediate Duration Portfolio10  

0.50% on 1st $1 billion

0.45% on next $ 2 billion

0.40% on next $ 2 billion

0.35% on next $ 2 billion

0.30% thereafter

  0.500%

The adviser also manages the AllianceBernstein Variable Products Series Fund, Inc. (“AVPS”), which is available through variable annuity and variable life contracts offered by other financial institutions and offers policyholders the option to utilize certain AVPS portfolios as the investment option underlying their insurance contracts. Set forth below is the fee schedule of the AVPS portfolio that has a somewhat similar investment style as the Portfolio.11 Also shown is what would have been the effective advisory fee of the Portfolio had the AVPS fee schedule been applicable to the Portfolio based on September 30, 2014 net assets:

 

Portfolio   AVPS Portfolio   Fee Schedule   AVPS
Effective
Fee
Taxable Multi- Sector Income Shares   Intermediate Bond Portfolio  

0.45% on first $2.5 billion

0.40% on next $2.5 billion

0.35% on the balance

  0.450%

 

9   Sanford C. Bernstein Fund II – Intermediate Duration Institutional Portfolio has an expense cap of 0.45%, which effectively reduces the advisory fee.

 

10   Sanford C. Bernstein Fund – Intermediate Duration Portfolio has an expense cap of 0.45%, which effectively reduces the advisory fees by at least five basis points.

 

11   The AVPS portfolio was also affected by the settlement between the Adviser and the NYAG.

 

38     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES


 

 

The AllianceBernstein Investment Trust Management mutual funds (“ITM”), which are offered to investors in Japan, have an “all-in” fee to compensate the Adviser for investment advisory as well as fund accounting and administrative related services. The fee schedule of the ITM mutual fund that has a somewhat similar investment style as the Fund is as follows:

 

Fund   ITM Mutual Fund   Fee
Taxable Multi-Sector Income Shares   AB Multi-Sector Bond Open (Hedged/Unhedged)   0.40%

The Adviser provides sub-advisory investment services to certain other investment companies managed by other fund families. The Adviser charges the following fee for the sub-advisory relationship that has a somewhat similar investment style as the Portfolio. Also shown is what would have been the effective advisory fee of the Portfolio had the fee schedule of the sub-advisory relationship been applicable to the Portfolio based on September 30, 2014 net assets:

 

Portfolio   Sub-advised
Fund
  Sub-advised Fund
Fee Schedule
  Sub-Advised
Management
Fund Effective
Fee
Taxable Multi-Sector Income Shares   Client #112  

0.29% on first $100 million

0.20% thereafter

  0.265%

It is fair to note that the services the Adviser provides pursuant to sub-advisory agreements are generally confined to the services related to the investment process; in other words, they are not as comprehensive as the services provided to the Portfolio by the Adviser. In addition, to the extent that this sub-advisory relationship is with an affiliate of the Adviser, the fee schedule may not reflect arm’s-length bargaining or negotiations.

While it appears that the sub-advisory relationship is paying a lower fee than the investment companies managed by the Adviser, it is difficult to evaluate the relevance of such a fee due to the differences in the services provided, risks involved and other competitive factors between the investment companies and the sub-advisory relationship. There could be various business reasons why an investment adviser would be willing to provide a sub-advised relationship investment related services at a different fee level than an investment company it is sponsoring where the investment adviser is provided all the services, not just investment management service generally required by a registered investment company.

 

12   This is the fee schedule of a fund managed for an affiliate of the Adviser.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       39   


 

 

 

II. MANAGEMENT FEES CHARGED BY OTHER MUTUAL FUND COMPANIES FOR LIKE SERVICES.

Lipper, Inc., an analytical service that is not affiliated with the Adviser, compared the fees charged to the Portfolio to the fees charged to other investment companies for similar services by other investment advisers.13 Each peer selected by Lipper had a similar fee arrangement as the Portfolio, which is to say that with respect to the Portfolio’s peers, all of their fund expenses, including management fees, were reimbursed by their respective investment advisers.14,15

The Portfolio does not pay an advisory fee to the Adviser since the SMA clients pay their wrap program provider a unitary fee for managing all investments of their portfolios. In addition, the Adviser reimburses the Portfolio for all of its operating expenses, except certain extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage costs and interest on borrowed money.

 

III. COSTS TO THE ADVISER AND ITS AFFILIATES OF SUPPLYING SERVICES PURSUANT TO THE ADVISORY FEE ARRANGEMENT, EXCLUDING ANY INTRA-CORPORATE PROFIT.

The Adviser utilizes two profitability reporting systems, which operate independently but are aligned with each other, to estimate the Adviser’s profitability in connection with investment advisory services provided to the Portfolio. The Senior Officer has retained a consultant to provide independent advice regarding the alignment of the two profitability systems as well as the methodologies and allocations utilized by both profitability systems. See Section IV for additional discussion.

 

IV. PROFIT MARGINS OF THE ADVISER AND ITS AFFILIATES FOR SUPPLYING SUCH SERVICES.

The profitability information for the Portfolio, prepared by the Adviser for the Board of Trustees, was reviewed by the Senior Officer and the consultant. The Portfolio does not pay an advisory fee to the Adviser. However, the Adviser does

 

13   The Supreme Court cautioned against accepting mutual fund fee comparisons without careful scrutiny since “these comparisons are problematic because these fees, like those challenged, may not be the product of negotiations conducted at arm’s length.” Jones v. Harris at 1429.

 

14   Only zero fee no-load funds that participated in a wrap fee program were considered for inclusion in the Portfolio’s EG, regardless of the Lipper investment classification/objective of the Funds’ peers. The Portfolio’s EG peers includes two other Core Bond Funds (“IID”), two BBB-rated Corporate Debt Funds (“BBB”), three Multi-Sector Income Fund (“MSI”), one Short-Intermediate Investment Grade Debt Fund (“SII”), three General Bond Funds (“GB”), one General & Insured Municipal Debt Fund (“GM”), one Inflation-Protected Bond Fund (“IUT”), two Global Income Funds (“GLI”) and one Intermediate Municipal Debt Fund (“IMD”).

 

15  

“Management Fee” is the fee attributable to the management and bearing of expenses of the funds (not the management of the wrap fee program). In each case, the advisory contract provides for an advisory or management fee of zero.

 

40     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES


 

 

profit indirectly through the advisory fees that it receives from the wrap program providers whose SMA clients invest in the Portfolio. The Adviser’s profitability with respect to the Portfolio, which was negative in 2013, was calculated using a weighted average of the profitability of the relevant SMA assets, in addition to any fund specific revenue or expense items.

AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. (“ABI”) and AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc. (“ABIS”), affiliates of the Adviser, serve as the Portfolio’s underwriter and transfer agent, respectively. The courts have referred to this type of business relationships as “fall-out benefits” to the Adviser and indicated that such benefits should be factored into the evaluation of the total relationship between the Portfolio and the Adviser. Neither case law nor common business practice precludes the Adviser’s affiliates from earning a reasonable profit on this type of relationship provided the affiliates’ charges and services are competitive. However, neither ABI nor ABIS receive a fee for serving as the Portfolio’s underwriter and transfer agent.

 

V. POSSIBLE ECONOMIES OF SCALE

The Adviser has indicated that economies of scale are being shared with shareholders through pricing to scale, breakpoints, fee reductions/waivers and enhancement to services.

In May 2012, an independent consultant, retained by the Senior Officer, provided the Board of Trustees information on the Adviser’s firm-wide average costs from 2005 through 2011 and the potential economies of scale. The independent consultant noted that from 2005 through 2007 the Adviser experienced significant growth in assets under management (“AUM”). During this period, operating expenses increased, in part to keep up with growth, and in part reflecting market returns. However, from 2008 through the first quarter of 2009, AUM rapidly and significantly decreased due to declines in market value and client withdrawals. When AUM rapidly decreased, some operating expenses categories, including base compensation and office space, adjusted more slowly during this period, resulting in an increase in average costs. Since 2009, AUM has experienced less significant changes. The independent consultant noted that changes in operating expenses reflect changes in business composition and business practices in response to changes in financial markets. Finally, the independent consultant concluded that the increase in average cost and the decline in net operating margin across the Adviser since late 2008 are inconsistent with the view that there are currently reductions in average costs due to economies of scale that can be shared with the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds managed by the Adviser through lower fees.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       41   


 

 

Previously, in February 2008, the independent consultant provided the Board of Trustees an update of the Deli16 study on advisory fees and various fund characteristics.17 The independent consultant first reiterated the results of his previous two dimensional comparison analysis (fund size and family size) with the Board of Trustees.18 The independent consultant then discussed the results of the regression model that was utilized to study the effects of various factors on advisory fees. The regression model output indicated that the bulk of the variation in fees predicted were explained by various factors, but substantially by fund AUM, family AUM, index fund indicator and investment style. The independent consultant also compared the advisory fees of the AllianceBernstein Mutual Funds to similar funds managed by 19 other large asset managers, regardless of the fund size and each Adviser’s proportion of mutual fund assets to non-mutual fund assets.

 

VI. NATURE AND QUALITY OF THE ADVISER’S SERVICES INCLUDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PORTFOLIO.

With assets under management of approximately $473 billion as of September 30, 2014, the Adviser has the investment experience to manage and provide non-investment services (described in Section I) to the Portfolio.

The information below, prepared by Lipper, shows the 1 year gross performance return and ranking of the Portfolio relative to its Lipper Performance Universe (“PU”)19 for the period ended July 31, 2014:

 

Taxable Multi-Sector
Income Shares
  Portfolio
Return (%)
    PU
Median (%)
    PU
Rank
 

1 Year

    1.89        6.83        22/22   

3 Year

    2.05        5.72        19/19   

 

16   The Deli study, originally published in 2002 based on 1997 data and updated for the February 2008 Presentation, may be of diminished value due to the age of the data used in the presentation and the changes experienced in the industry since 2008.

 

17   As mentioned previously, the Supreme Court cautioned against accepting mutual fund fee comparisons without careful scrutiny since the fees may not be the product of negotiations conducted at arm’s length. See Jones V. Harris at 1429.

 

18   The two dimensional analysis showed patterns of lower advisory fees for funds with larger asset sizes and funds from larger family sizes compared to funds with smaller asset sizes and funds from smaller family sizes, which according to the independent consultant is indicative of a sharing of economies of scale and scope. However, in less liquid and active markets, such is not the case, as the empirical analysis showed potential for diseconomies of scale in those markets. The empirical analysis also showed diminishing economies of scale and scope as funds surpassed a certain high level of assets.

 

19   The Portfolio’s PU includes peers with the same Lipper investment classification/objective and load type as the Portfolio.

 

42     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES


 

 

Set forth below are the 1 year and since inception net performance returns of the Portfolio (in bold)20 versus its benchmark.21 Portfolio and benchmark volatility and reward-to-variability ratio (“Sharpe Ratio”) information is also shown.22

 

     Periods Ending July 31, 2014
Annualized Net Performance (%)
 
     1 Year
(%)
    3 Year
(%)
    Since
Inception
(%)
    Volatility
(%)
    Sharpe
(%)
    Risk
Period
(Year)
 
Taxable Multi-Sector     1.89        2.05        2.90        1.88        1.03        3   
Income Shares            
Barclays Capital US Aggregate ex Govt. Index     5.29        3.58        3.95        2.81        1.24        3   
Inception Date: September 15, 2010            

CONCLUSION:

Based on the factors discussed above the Senior Officer’s conclusion is that the Investment Advisory Agreement for the Portfolio is reasonable and within the range of what would have been negotiated at arm’s-length in light of all the surrounding circumstances. This conclusion with respect to the Portfolio is based on an evaluation of all of these factors and no single factor was dispositive.

Dated: November 18, 2014

 

20   The performance returns of the Portfolio were provided Lipper. Lipper maintains its own database that includes the Portfolio’s performance returns.

 

21   The Adviser provided Portfolio and benchmark performance return information for the periods through July 31, 2014.

 

22   Portfolio and benchmark volatility and Sharpe Ratio information was obtained through Lipper LANA, a database maintained by Lipper. Volatility is a statistical measure of the tendency of a market price or yield to vary over time. A Sharpe Ratio is a risk adjusted measure of return that divides a fund’s return in excess of the riskless return by the fund’s standard deviation. A fund with a greater volatility would be viewed as more risky than a fund with equivalent performance but lower volatility; for that reason, a greater return would be demanded for the more risky fund. A fund with a higher Sharpe Ratio would be viewed as better performing than a fund with a lower Sharpe Ratio.

 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES       43   


THIS PAGE IS NOT PART OF THE SHAREHOLDER REPORT OR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN FAMILY OF FUNDS

 

US Equity

US Core

Core Opportunities Fund

Select US Equity Portfolio

US Growth

Concentrated Growth Fund

Discovery Growth Fund

Growth Fund

Large Cap Growth Fund

Small Cap Growth Portfolio

US Value

Discovery Value Fund

Equity Income Fund

Growth & Income Fund

Value Fund

International/Global Equity

International/Global Core

Global Equity & Covered Call Strategy Fund

Global Thematic Growth Fund

International Portfolio

Tax-Managed International Portfolio

International/Global Growth

International Growth Fund

International/Global Value

International Value Fund

Fixed Income

Municipal

High Income Municipal Portfolio

Intermediate California Portfolio

Intermediate Diversified Portfolio

Intermediate New York Portfolio

Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy

Tax-Aware Fixed Income Portfolio

National Portfolio

Arizona Portfolio

California Portfolio

Massachusetts Portfolio

Michigan Portfolio

Minnesota Portfolio

New Jersey Portfolio

New York Portfolio

Ohio Portfolio

Pennsylvania Portfolio

Virginia Portfolio

Taxable

Bond Inflation Strategy

Global Bond Fund

Fixed Income (continued)

Taxable

High Income Fund

High Yield Portfolio

Intermediate Bond Portfolio

Limited Duration High Income Portfolio

Short Duration Portfolio

Alternatives

All Market Real Return Portfolio*

Credit Long/Short Portfolio

Global Real Estate Investment Fund

Long/Short Multi-Manager Fund

Market Neutral Strategy-U.S.

Multi-Manager Alternative Strategies Fund

Select US Long/Short Portfolio

Unconstrained Bond Fund

Multi-Asset

All Market Growth Portfolio*

Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Portfolio

Global Risk Allocation Fund

Retirement Strategies

2000 Retirement Strategy

2005 Retirement Strategy

2010 Retirement Strategy

2015 Retirement Strategy

2020 Retirement Strategy

2025 Retirement Strategy

2030 Retirement Strategy

2035 Retirement Strategy

2040 Retirement Strategy

2045 Retirement Strategy

2050 Retirement Strategy

2055 Retirement Strategy

Wealth Strategies

Balanced Wealth Strategy

Conservative Wealth Strategy

Wealth Appreciation Strategy

Tax-Managed Balanced Wealth Strategy

Tax-Managed Conservative Wealth Strategy

Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy

Closed-End Funds

Alliance California Municipal Income Fund

Alliance New York Municipal Income Fund

AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund

AllianceBernstein Income Fund

AllianceBernstein Multi-Manager Alternative Fund

AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund

 

We also offer Exchange Reserves, which serves as the money market fund exchange vehicle for the AllianceBernstein mutual funds. An investment in Exchange Reserves is not a deposit in a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the Fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the Fund carefully before investing. For copies of our prospectus or summary prospectus, which contain this and other information, visit us online at www.alliancebernstein.com or contact your AllianceBernstein investments representative. Please read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

* Prior to December 15, 2014, All Market Growth Portfolio was named Dynamic All Market Fund; All Market Real Return Portfolio was named Real Asset Strategy.

 

44     ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

Alliancebernstein Family of Funds


ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN TAXABLE MULTI-SECTOR INCOME SHARES

1345 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10105

800.221.5672

 

LOGO

 

 

TMSIS-0152-1014   LOGO


ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.

Not applicable when filing a semi-annual report to shareholders.

ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.

Not applicable when filing a semi-annual report to shareholders.

ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

Not applicable when filing a semi-annual report to shareholders.

ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.

Not applicable to the registrant.

ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.

Please see Schedule of Investments contained in the Report to Shareholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Not applicable to the registrant.

ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Not applicable to the registrant.

ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.

Not applicable to the registrant.

ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Fund’s Board of Directors since the Fund last provided disclosure in response to this item.


ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-2(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) are effective at the reasonable assurance level based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this document.

(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.

The following exhibits are attached to this Form N-CSR:

 

EXHIBIT NO.

 

DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT

12 (b) (1)   Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
12 (b) (2)   Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
12 (c)   Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

(Registrant): AllianceBernstein Corporate Shares

 

By:  

/s/ Robert M. Keith

  Robert M. Keith
  President
Date:   December 19, 2014

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

By:  

/s/ Robert M. Keith

  Robert M. Keith
  President
Date:   December 19, 2014
By:  

/s/ Joseph J. Mantineo

  Joseph J. Mantineo
  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Date:   December 19, 2014