10-Q/A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q/A

(Amendment No. 1)

(Mark One)

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 001-33484

HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	05-0587367
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

One Kendall Square, Building 200, Cambridge, MA 02139
(617) 264-1800

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including

area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period than the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes: x  No: o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes: x No: o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes: o  No: x

The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding as of November 1, 2011, was 87,234,155 shares.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This amendment on Form 10-Q/A is being filed to amend Helicos BioSciences Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2011 (the “Original Filing”).  The purpose of the amendment is to correct a typographical error which resulted in the inadvertent omission of the word “no” from two sentences in the Form 10-Q.  The error appeared on page 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Original Filing, in the second-to-last sentence of the fifth paragraph under “Note 1. Nature of the Business and Basis of Presentation.”

This amendment corrects the sentence to read as follows:

“There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in this litigation, even in the event of a favorable outcome in this litigation there can be no assurance that there will be any proceeds remaining for common shareholders, as a result of various arrangements in place with professional service providers, bridge lenders, licensors and others.”

The error also appeared in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section at the top of page 15 of the Original Filing, in the third full sentence beginning “There is no assurance…”

This amendment corrects the sentence to read as follows:

“There is no assurance that we will be successful in this litigation, even in the event of a favorable outcome in this litigation there can be no assurance that there will be any proceeds remaining for common shareholders, as a result of various arrangements in place with professional service providers, bridge lenders, licensors and others.”

We are not amending any other part of the Original Filing. This Form 10-Q/A speaks as of the date of the Original Filing and there are no events that occurred subsequent to the date of the Original Filing that require disclosure, other than the matter discussed above.

HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION (a development stage company)

Table of Contents

		Page
Part I—Financial Information
Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011	3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 and the cumulative period from May 9, 2003 (date of inception) through September 30, 2011	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 and the cumulative period from May 9, 2003 (date of inception) through September 30, 2011	5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	23
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	24
Part II—Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	25
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	25
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	25
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	25
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	26
Item 5.	Other Information	26
Item 6.	Exhibits	26
SIGNATURES		27

2

Part I—Financial Information

Item 1.  Consolidated Financial Statements

HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION (a development stage company)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

	December 31, 2010			September 30, 2011
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,513		$	550
Accounts receivable	267			317
Unbilled receivables	704			225
Inventory	2,935			2,935
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	306			162
Total current assets	6,725			4,189
Property and equipment, net	126			51
Other assets	152			82
Total assets	$	7,003		$	4,322
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	794		$	579
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	1,388			1,356
Deferred revenue	7,314			7,980
Current portion of long-term debt	2,779			1,767
Total current liabilities	12,275			11,682
Long-term debt, net of current portion	674			725
Warrants	220			70
Total liabilities	13,169			12,477
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ deficit
Preferred stock: par value $0.001 per share; 5,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011; no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011	—			—
Common stock: par value $0.001 per share; 120,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011; 86,557,606 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 87,233,989 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011	87			87
Additional paid-in capital	180,180			181,164
Deficit accumulated during the development stage	(186,433		)	(189,406		)
Total stockholders’ deficit	(6,166		)	(8,155		)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	7,003		$	4,322

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the interim consolidated financial statements.

3

HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION (a development stage company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

													Period from
													May 9, 2003
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						(date of inception)
	September 30,						September 30,						through
	2010			2011			2010			2011			September 30, 2011
Product revenue	$	214		$	116		$	341		$	454		$	4,116
Service revenue	—			385			—			1,029			1,029
Grant revenue	422			224			1,525			1,233			6,543
Total revenue	636			725			1,866			2,716			11,688
Costs and expenses
Cost of product revenue	94			70			270			201			2,163
Research and development	4,945			490			13,207			2,625			111,288
Selling, general and administrative	2,347			785			9,112			3,177			74,119
Impairment of long-lived assets	1,894			—			1,894			—			1,894
Total costs and expenses	9,280			1,345			24,483			6,003			189,464
Operating loss	(8,644		)	(620		)	(22,617		)	(3,287		)	(177,776		)
Interest income	1			—			18			—			4,153
Interest expense	(106		)	(151		)	(451		)	(544		)	(5,050		)
Change in fair value of warrant liability	(130		)	(27		)	3,117			(42		)	6,035
Other income	—			—			—			900			1,372
Net loss	(8,879		)	(798		)	(19,933		)	(2,973		)	(171,266		)
Beneficial conversion feature related to Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock	—			—			—			—			(18,140		)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(8,879	)	$	(798	)	$	(19,933	)	$	(2,973	)	$	(189,406	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders per share—basic and diluted	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.03	)
Weighted average number of common shares used in computation—basic and diluted	79,459,909			85,418,524			78,193,483			85,503,181

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the interim consolidated financial statements.

4

HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION (a development stage company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

							Period from
							May 9, 2003
	Nine Months Ended						(date of inception)
	September 30,						through
	2010			2011			September 30, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(19,933	)	$	(2,973	)	$	(171,266	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	1,019			8			9,066
Amortization of lease incentive	(4		)	—			(474		)
Common stock issued for licenses	—			—			147
Stock-based compensation expense	4,704			780			20,594
Noncash license fee	—			—			54
Noncash interest expense related to debt and warrants	193			383			1,520
Noncash (income) expense related to change in fair value of warrant liability	(3,117		)	42			(6,035		)
Provisions on inventory	2,570			—			5,846
Gain (loss) on disposal of property and equipment	(23		)	—			(7		)
Impairment of long-lived assets	1,894			—			1,894
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	651			(50		)	(317		)
Unbilled receivable	73			479			25
Inventory	(1,013		)	—			(11,226		)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	42			91			(541		)
Deferred revenue	1,514			666			7,893
Accounts payable	(188		)	(215		)	579
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	(569		)	(32		)	3,029
Other long-term liabilities	—			—			557
Net cash used in operating activities	(12,187		)	(821		)	(138,662		)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	(37		)	—			(9,541		)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets	33			75			108
Purchases of short-term investments	—			—			(34,709		)
Maturities of short-term investments	—			—			34,709
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(4		)	75			(9,433		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from debt issuances	—			—			22,256
Payments on debt	(2,050		)	(1,230		)	(21,110		)
Payments of debt issuance costs	—			—			(453		)
Proceeds from initial public offering	—			—			49,011
Deferred initial public offering costs	—			—			(1,838		)
Proceeds from issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock, net of issuance costs	—			—			66,405
Proceeds from bridge loan	—			—			1,017
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and common stock warrants	158			—			32,807
Proceeds from issuance of restricted common stock	—			—			338
Proceeds from exercise of warrants	—			13			(91		)
Payments to employees for cancelled restricted common stock	—			—			197
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	3			—			106
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(1,889		)	(1,217		)	148,645
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(14,080		)	(1,963		)	550
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	15,930			2,513			—
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	1,850		$	550		$	550

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the interim consolidated financial statements.

5

HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION (a development stage company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1. Nature of the Business and Basis of Presentation

Helicos BioSciences Corporation (“Helicos” or the “Company”) is a life sciences company focused on innovative genetic analysis technologies. Helicos has developed a proprietary technology to enable the rapid analysis of large volumes of genetic material by directly sequencing single molecules of DNA or RNA. The Company’s tSMS approach differs from current methods of sequencing DNA or RNA because it analyzes individual molecules of DNA directly instead of analyzing a large number of copies of the molecule which must be produced through complex sample preparation techniques. The Company’s tSMS technology eliminates the need for costly, labor-intensive and time-consuming sample preparation techniques, such as amplification or cloning, which are required by other methods to produce a sufficient quantity of genetic material for analysis.

The Company’s Helicos® Genetic Analysis Platform is designed to obtain sequencing information by repetitively performing a cycle of biochemical reactions on individual DNA or RNA molecules and imaging the results after each cycle. The platform consists of an instrument called the HeliScope™ Single Molecule Sequencer, an image analysis computer tower called the HeliScope™ Analysis Engine, associated reagents, which are chemicals used in the sequencing process, and disposable supplies. The information generated from using our tSMS products may lead to improved drug therapies, personalized medical treatments and more accurate diagnostics for cancer and other diseases.

The Company has had limited operations to date and its activities have consisted primarily of raising capital, conducting research and development and recruiting personnel. Accordingly, the Company is considered to be in the development stage at September 30, 2011, as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). The Company’s fiscal year ends on December 31. The Company operates as one reportable segment. Helicos is a Delaware corporation and was incorporated on May 9, 2003.

The Company plans to deploy its limited resources by focusing on intellectual property monetization and selected research and development activities that are primarily related to grant-funded initiatives. In addition, the Company has  scaled-down other research and development efforts in targeted areas that were designed to achieve tangible proof-of-concept goals connected with potential partnership opportunities with companies interested in next-generation sequencing, or to pursue other funding and strategic alternatives. As of the date of this filing, the Company does not have adequate resources and will continue to need to generate additional funding from various sources including contract sequencing service projects and government grants. The Company plans to defend its intellectual property rights through licensing and enforcement strategies. In this regard, the Company took several actions. The Company filed a lawsuit against Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc., Illumina, Inc. and Life Technologies Corporation (collectively, the “Defendants”) for patent infringement. The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, accuses the Defendants of infringing several patents and seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages. The Company is seeking a permanent injunction enjoining the Defendants from further infringement as well as monetary and punitive damages, costs and attorneys’ fees, interest and other relief as determined by the Court.

In connection with the Bridge Debt Financing and the Senior Debt and as security for the Company’s obligations under our contingency fee arrangement with outside intellectual property litigation counsel relating to the patent infringement lawsuit the Company filed against Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc., Illumina, Inc. and Life Technologies Corporation, the Company entered into a subordinated security agreement with outside intellectual property litigation counsel. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company agreed to grant outside intellectual property litigation counsel a second priority security interest in the patent infringement lawsuit. Under the terms of the contingency fee arrangement, the Company is obligated to pay outside intellectual property litigation counsel up to 40% of the proceeds paid to the Company in connection with the settlement, judgment or other resolution of the Cause of Action (as defined in the contingency fee arrangement) or certain business transactions resulting from or relating to the patent infringement lawsuit. To date, the Company and those providing professional services in connection with this patent litigation on a contingent basis have expended significant resources in pursuit of this intellectual property monetization effort and are expected to continue to do so going forward. The Company believes that the net proceeds generated by this litigation, if the Company is successful, could be substantial. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in this litigation, even in the event of a favorable outcome in this litigation there can be no assurance that there will be any proceeds remaining for common shareholders, as a result of various arrangements in place with professional service providers, bridge lenders, licensors and others. The Company also continues to pursue its technology licensing program for its Single Molecule Sequencing and Sequencing-by-Synthesis intellectual property.

6

HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION (a development stage company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

In March 2005, the Company entered into an agreement (as amended, the “License Agreement”) with Arizona Technology Enterprises (“AZTE”) in which AZTE granted the Company a worldwide, exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-bearing license, with the right to grant sublicenses, under a family of specified patents and patent applications (the “Licensed Patents”) exclusively licensed by AZTE from the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State University within a specified field of use.  On August 26, 2011, the Company and AZTE entered into a First Amendment to the License Agreement (the “Amendment”).  The Amendment expanded the field under the License Agreement so that AZTE has now granted the Company the exclusive right and license under the Licensed Patents to the full extent of the entire scope of all claims within the Licensed Patents, in all fields of use.  AZTE’s license to the Company under the License Agreement (the “AZTE Licensed Rights”), which gives the Company rights to several issued patents covering sequencing-by-synthesis methods and a number of pending patent applications, now expressly includes detection methods that do not rely on the detection of optically-labeled nucleotides (the “Expanded Field”).  Under the terms of the Amendment, the Company will remain obligated to pay AZTE a specified percentage of income from Company-granted sublicenses or other transfers of the AZTE Licensed Rights, including as part of any sale of the Company or litigation settlement.  Amounts the Company owes to AZTE will be a percentage of the proportionate value of the AZTE Licensed Rights in any such transaction.  The Company has also agreed to make additional payments to AZTE for Company-granted sublicenses or other such transfers of the AZTE Licensed Rights within the Expanded Field.  The Company will retain its existing first right to initiate and pursue patent infringement suits involving the AZTE Licensed Rights.

Although the Company believes that the HeliScope Sequencer has unique utility across a broad array of molecular diagnostic (“MDx”) tests, due to significant financial and resource constraints and a lack of any significant improvement to the financial outlook of the Company, the Company has further delayed its efforts to bring high-value MDx tests based on its technology to the market through a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (“CLIA”) laboratory partnership. Nevertheless, the Company still believes that diagnostic applications may benefit from the specific features of the Helicos System, including the platform’s ability to sequence non-amplified natural DNA and RNA directly, quantitative accuracy, high throughput, ability to use small sample quantities in simple and cost effective preparation methods, as well as a lack of biases typically seen with sample amplification. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to deploy MDx tests or its technology through a CLIA laboratory, out-licensing or through its own efforts.

In order to further conserve its limited resources, during the second quarter of 2011, the Company further reduced its workforce by phasing out six business and research positions. These six positions were phased out during the third quarter of 2011 and ultimately reduced the Company’s total headcount to ten positions. In addition, during the third quarter of 2011, the Company entered into a new lease reducing the size and associated expense of its leased facility in Cambridge, Massachusetts which will house the Company’s headquarters and scientific laboratory. The Company did not incur or pay out severance charges or lease exit costs in connection with the implementation of these measures. Notwithstanding these most recent workforce reductions and despite the Company’s previous reductions, restructurings, expense saving measures, and the Senior Debt and the Bridge Debt Financing (see Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements), the Company does not have sufficient funds to pursue its business priorities. The Company will require significant additional capital by December 2011 to continue its operations beyond the existing $2,000,000 committed portion of the Bridge Debt. As of the date of this filing, $666,667 has been drawn against this committed facility and $1,333,333 remains available to support ongoing operations. Potential sources of additional funding may include funding from the $2,000,000 uncommitted portion of the Bridge Debt Financing facility and/or from other sources that have not yet been identified, but there can be no assurance that any such funding will be available on reasonable terms, if at all. As a result, the Company is no longer able to remain current in making payments to trade vendors and other unsecured creditors when such payments are due and, despite the restructuring of its Senior Debt, this inability to remain current increases the likelihood that the Lenders could declare a default under the Senior Debt in the near-term, including with regard to solvency. For the period from November 2010 through April 2011, the Company made interest only payments on amounts outstanding on the Senior Debt. Beginning in May 2011, the Company resumed making monthly principal payments of approximately $0.25 million on its Senior Debt. Workforce reductions, as well as curtailed financial resources, will further impact the Company’s ability to implement its business priorities. In addition, these constraints have caused the Company to significantly scale back service support and reagent supply to its current installed base. The Company has also significantly curtailed collaborative activities with other parties. The Company believes that these actions will provide additional time to execute its business priorities.

In November 2010, the Company’s securities were delisted from the NASDAQ Global Market and the trading of its common stock was suspended before the opening of business on November 16, 2010, and a Form 25-NSE was subsequently filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 21, 2011 which removed the Company’s securities from listing and registration on The NASDAQ Stock Market. The Company’s securities are currently traded under the symbol “HLCS” on the OTCQB which is a market tier for OTC-traded companies that are registered and reporting with the SEC.

7

HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION (a development stage company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

The Company’s future capital requirements will depend on many factors and it may require additional capital beyond its currently anticipated amounts. Any such required additional capital may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all, given the Company’s prospects, the current economic environment and restricted access to capital markets. The continued depletion of its resources may make future funding more difficult or expensive to obtain. Additional equity financing may be dilutive to the Company’s stockholders; debt financing, if available, may involve significant cash payment obligations and covenants that restrict its ability to operate as a business; and strategic partnerships may result in royalties or other terms which reduce its economic potential from any adjustments to its existing long-term strategy. If the Company is unable to execute its operations according to its plans or to obtain additional financing, the Company may be forced to cease operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets or the amount of reclassification of liabilities, or any adjustment that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Since inception, the Company has incurred losses and has not generated positive cash flows from operations. The Company expects its losses to continue for a considerable period of time. These losses, among other things, have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on its working capital, total assets and stockholders’ equity/(deficit). As of September 30, 2011 and November 1, 2011, the Company had $550,000 and $275,000, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents. The Company will require significant additional capital in December 2011 to continue its operations beyond the existing $2,000,000 committed portion of the Bridge Debt. As of the date of this filing, $666,667 has been drawn against this committed facility and $1,333,333 remains available to support ongoing operations. Potential sources of additional funding may include funding from the $2,000,000 uncommitted portion of the Bridge Debt Financing facility and/or from other sources that have not yet been identified, but there can be no assurance that any such funding will be available on reasonable terms, if at all. Including $1,333,333 of the available Bridge Debt facility, the Company has $1,608,333 in total available resources as of November 1, 2011 and owes approximately $250,000 in monthly principal payments for each of December 2011 and January 2012 as well as a final $800,000 payment on the Senior Debt due in January 2012. If the Company is unable to execute its operations according to its plans or to obtain additional financing, the Company may be forced to cease operations. The Company’s present capital resources are not sufficient to fund its planned operations for a twelve month period as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011.Accordingly, the Company’s current financial resources raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States of America requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the financial statements. Actual amounts may differ from these estimates because of different assumptions or conditions. The year-end consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by GAAP. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

It is management’s opinion that the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (which are normal and recurring) that are necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods. The interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The Company’s significant accounting policies were identified in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

Revenue recognition

Government research grants that provide for payments to the Company for work performed are recognized as revenue when the related expenses are incurred.

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with accounting guidance on revenue recognition in financial statements and accounting for multiple element revenue arrangements. This guidance requires that persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists, delivery of goods occurs through transfer of title and risk and rewards of ownership, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company also follows accounting guidance on how to account for arrangements that involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets.

8

HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION (a development stage company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

In past instances and according to accounting guidance on revenue recognition in financial statements and accounting for multiple element revenue arrangements existent at the time of the transactions, where the Company sold instruments with a related installation obligation, the Company allocated revenue between the instrument and the installation based on relative fair value at the time of the sale. The instrument revenue will be recognized when title and risk of loss passes. The installation revenue will be recognized when the installation is performed. If fair value was not available for any undelivered element, revenue for all elements was deferred until delivery and installation are complete. In instances where the Company sells an instrument with specified acceptance criteria, the Company will defer revenue recognition until such acceptance has been obtained.

Revenue from service contracts sold in conjunction with the sale of equipment is recognized ratably over the service period and revenue from contract sequencing services is recognized when results of the Company’s testing are delivered to and accepted by the customer.

The costs of service and grant revenue are included in research and development expense.

As of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, the Company had deferred revenue of $7.3 million and $8.0 million, respectively. Pursuant to the revenue recognition guidelines for multiple element, single accounting unit arrangements, the Company has continued to defer recognition of these amounts as revenue due to the uncertainty associated with the Company’s ability to deliver on all of the obligations under these arrangements. These amounts have been received and future revenue recognition will have no effect on the Company’s cash balances.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. This guidance provides principles for allocation of consideration among its multiple-elements, allowing more flexibility in identifying and accounting for separate deliverables under an arrangement. The guidance introduces an estimated selling price method for valuing the elements of a bundled arrangement if vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence of selling price is not available, and significantly expands related disclosure requirements. This guidance is effective on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company adopted this accounting guidance on a prospective basis in the first quarter of 2011 for new and materially modified revenue arrangements. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard clarifies the existing accounting guidance such that tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality, shall be excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition accounting standards. Accordingly, sales of these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition accounting standards or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of the arrangement consideration for each element of the arrangement. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2011. This adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2011, the Company adopted “Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements” which requires additional disclosure about the amounts of and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. In addition, effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010, which for the Company is January 1, 2011, this standard further requires an entity to present disaggregated information about activity in Level 3 fair value measurements on a gross basis, rather than as one net amount. As this accounting standard only requires enhanced disclosure, the adoption of this newly issued accounting standard did not impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In May 2011, the FASB issued  “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendment to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs”. This newly issued accounting standard clarifies the application of certain existing fair value measurement guidance and expands the disclosure for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. This ASU is effective on a prospective basis for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, which for the Company is January 1, 2012. The Company does not expect that adoption of this standard will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

9

HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION (a development stage company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

In June 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance for presentation of comprehensive income. This newly issued accounting standard (1) eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity; (2) requires the consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income; and (3) requires an entity to present reclassification adjustments on the face of the financial statements from other comprehensive income to net income. The amendments in this Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income nor do the amendments affect how earnings per share is calculated or presented. This ASU is required to be applied retrospectively and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011. As this accounting standard only requires enhanced disclosure, the adoption of this standard will not impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

3. Inventory

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined under the first-in, first-out, or FIFO, method. The Company’s inventory at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011 was $2,935,000 and consisted of finished goods. These finished goods relate to sales for which the revenue has been deferred and will be recognized as cost of sales when revenue for such sales is recognized.

4. Net Loss per Share

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The Company’s potential dilutive shares, which include outstanding common stock options, unvested restricted stock and warrants, have not been included in the computation of diluted net loss per share for both periods as the result would be antidilutive. Such potentially dilutive shares are excluded when the effect would be to reduce net loss per share. Because the Company reported a net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011, all potential common shares have been excluded from the computation of the dilutive net loss per share for all periods.  Such potential common shares consist of the following:

	September 30,
	2010	2011
Stock options	2,514,108	990,389
Unvested restricted stock	2,010,888	1,906,381
Warrants	27,952,358	22,653,964
	32,477,354	25,550,734

5. Stock-Based Compensation

The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense on all employee and non-employee awards as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2010		2011		2010		2011
Selling, general and administrative	$	912	$	161	$	3,530	$	547
Research and development	243		40		1,174		233
Total	$	1,155	$	201	$	4,704	$	780

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company granted 10,750 stock options at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, 2,000 stock options at an exercise price of $0.7625 per share and 1,749,591 shares of restricted stock. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company did not grant any stock options or shares of restricted stock. No stock-based compensation has been capitalized.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the fair value of stock options was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following assumptions:

10

HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION (a development stage company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

	Nine months ended September 30, 2010
Expected volatility	94.1	%
Expected life in years	6.0
Weighted average risk-free interest rate	1.3	%
Expected dividends	0.0	%

6. Fair Value Measurement

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of generally three months or less at the time of acquisition to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair market value. The Company classifies marketable securities as available-for-sale. These securities are carried at fair market value with unrealized gains and, to the extent deemed temporary, unrealized losses, are reported as a component of other comprehensive gain or loss in stockholders’ deficit. Realized gains or losses on securities sold are based on the specific identification method.

Marketable securities are considered to be impaired when a decline in fair value below cost basis is determined to be other-than-temporary. The Company evaluates whether a decline in fair value below cost basis is other-than-temporary using available evidence regarding its investments. In the event that the cost basis of a security significantly exceeds its fair value, the Company evaluates, among other factors, the duration of the period that, and extent to which, the fair value is less than cost basis, the financial health of and business outlook for the issuer, including industry and sector performance, and operational and financing cash flow factors, overall market conditions and trends, the Company’s intent to sell the investment and if it is more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell the investment before its anticipated recovery. Once a decline in fair value is determined to be other-than-temporary, a write-down is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and a new cost basis in the security is established.

Regardless of the Company’s intent to sell a security, the Company performs additional analysis on all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate losses associated with the creditworthiness of the security. Credit losses are identified where the Company does not expect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the amortized cost basis of a security.

The Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011 are measured in accordance with FASB standards. Fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize observable data such as quoted prices in active markets. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs utilize unobservable data points in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The following table represents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2010:

($ in thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Money market funds	$	—	$	53	$	—	$	53
Warrant liability	—		—		220		220

The Company’s money market funds were valued at December 31, 2010 using calculated net asset values and are therefore classified as Level 2. The Company’s warrant liability was valued at December 31, 2010 using a Black- Scholes model and is therefore classified as Level 3.

The following table represents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2011:

($ in thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Money market funds	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Warrant liability	—		—		70		70

11

HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION (a development stage company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

The Company’s warrant liability was valued at September 30, 2011 using a Black- Scholes model and is therefore classified as Level 3.

The following tables roll forward the fair value of our warrant liability, whose fair value is determined by Level 3 inputs for the 2011 period presented:

Balance at December 31, 2010	$	220
Exercise warrants	(192		)
Change in fair value	56
Balance at March 31, 2011	$	84
Exercise warrants	—
Change in fair value	(41		)
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	43
Exercise warrants	—
Change in fair value	27
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	70

The Company’s warrant liability relates to warrants issued in connection with two offerings of common stock in 2009. An aggregate of 6,482,505 warrants were issued pursuant to these two offerings, of which 1,945,099 were outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and 681,884 were outstanding as of September 30, 2011. The fair value of the warrants is estimated using a Black-Scholes model. Due to a price adjustment clause included in the warrant agreements, the warrants were deemed to be a liability and, therefore, the fair value of the warrants is recorded in the liability section of the balance sheet. As such, the outstanding warrants are revalued each reporting period with the resulting gains and losses recorded as the change in fair value of warrant liability on the statement of operations.

The carrying amount of the Company’s debt approximates its fair value at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011.

7. Debt

In November 2010, the Company entered into an insider bridge loan facility with two of the four venture capital firms whose representatives are members of the Board. In connection with this transaction, the Company entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “Subordinated Secured Note Purchase Agreement”) with investment funds affiliated with Atlas Venture and Flagship Ventures (the “Purchasers”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to the Purchasers, and the Purchasers have agreed to purchase, up to an aggregate of $4,000,000 of convertible promissory notes (the “Notes”), a portion of which is committed and a portion of which is optional (the “Bridge Debt Financing”). As of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, the Purchasers have purchased Notes having an aggregate principal amount of $666,667. Subject to the Company’s continued compliance with the terms of the Subordinated Secured Note Purchase Agreement, including that there not be an event of default thereunder, upon notice from the Company the Purchasers are committed to purchase an aggregate of an additional $333,333 of Notes in each of four subsequent closings, for a total aggregate committed amount of $2,000,000. The Purchasers also have the right, but not the obligation, upon the Company’s request to purchase up to an additional $2,000,000 of Notes on or before December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, the Company’s outstanding indebtedness under the Notes was $674,000 and $725,000, respectively, including accrued interest.

As an inducement for the Purchasers to purchase the Notes, the Company entered into a Risk Premium Payment Agreement in November 2010 with the Purchasers (the “Risk Premium Agreement”) simultaneous with the execution of, and as required by, the Subordinated Secured Note Purchase Agreement. Under the terms of the Risk Premium Agreement, the Company agreed to pay the Purchasers the following portions of the consideration it receives (the “Payment Consideration”) in Liquidity Transactions, as defined below: (i) until the aggregate Payment Consideration equals $10 million, 60% of the Payment Consideration; (ii) for aggregate Payment Consideration from $10 million to $20 million, 50% of the Payment Consideration; (iii) for aggregate Payment Consideration from $20 million to $30 million, 40% of the Payment Consideration; (iv) for aggregate Payment Consideration from $30 million to $40 million, 30% of the Payment Consideration; and (v) for aggregate Payment Consideration in excess of $40 million, 10% of the Payment Consideration (any such payments, “Risk Premium Payments”). For purposes of determining amounts payable under the Risk Premium

12

HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION (a development stage company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

Agreement, the Payment Consideration will not include amounts the Company uses to first satisfy specified existing obligations, including obligations under the Loan Agreement, under professional contingency arrangements and obligations that may arise under existing technology license agreements (the “Existing IP Licensing Agreements”) between the Company and each of Arizona Technology Enterprises, Roche Diagnostics GMBH and Roche Diagnostics Corporation, and California Institute of Technology. For purposes of the Risk Premium Agreement and subject to various provisions therein, the following shall constitute Liquidity Transactions: (A) the receipt by the Company of any payments from third parties relating to its intellectual property portfolio of the Company, including payments received as a license or other settlement in patent infringement litigation brought by the Company (“IP Licensing Events”); (B) a merger of the Company in which there is a change of control; and (C) the sale or exclusive license by the Company of all or substantially all of its assets or intellectual property.

In connection with the Bridge Debt Financing in November 2010, the Company amended the existing Loan and Security Agreement (the “Senior Debt”) between the Company and certain lenders, including General Electric Capital Corporation (the “Lenders”), pursuant to the fourth amendment thereto (the “Fourth Amendment”). Pursuant to the Fourth Amendment, the Lenders waived various existing events of default and consented to the Company’s incurrence of additional indebtedness and the grant of a junior security interest to the Purchasers under the Subordinated Secured Note Purchase Agreement. The Company amended warrants previously issued to the Lenders to re-price the warrants from $4.80 to $0.01 and the Lenders agreed to defer a $200,000 payment originally due January 31, 2011 to the January 1, 2012 term loan maturity date. In addition, subject to the Company’s continued compliance with the terms of the Senior Debt, including that there not be an event of default thereunder, the Lenders agreed to defer up to five additional principal monthly payments with respect to the term loan. Also pursuant to the Fourth Amendment, the Company agreed to grant the Lenders a first priority security interest in all of its intellectual property and to pay the Lenders an additional $50,000 to $200,000 (depending upon how many principal payments are deferred) upon the full repayment of all outstanding amounts due with respect to the term loans. Under the terms of the Senior Debt prior to its amendment by the Fourth Amendment, the scope of the Lenders’ first priority security interest included all of its assets other than intellectual property. As of the date of this filing, the additional five monthly principal payments referenced above have been deferred and monthly principal payments of approximately $0.25 million resumed as of May 1, 2011. As of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, the outstanding balance of the Senior Debt was $2.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively.

As of September 30, 2011, loan payments are due as follows (in thousands):

	Senior Debt			Notes			Total
Twelve months ending September 30, 2012	$	1,851		$	—		$	1,851
Twelve months ending September 30, 2013	—			743			743
Thereafter	—			—			—
Total future minimum payments	1,851			743			2,594
Less: amount representing interest	(24		)	(77		)	(101		)
Less: debt discount	(800		)	—			(800		)
Add: interest accrued	—			59			59
Add: amortization of debt discount	740			—			740
Carrying value of debt	1,767			725			2,492
Less: current portion	(1,767		)	—			(1,767		)
Long-term obligations	$	—		$	725		$	725

The above table does not reflect any Risk Premium Payments potentially due to the Note holders pursuant to the Risk Premium Agreement. Such payments are not probable or estimable at September 30, 2011 without specific eligible transactions to assess the financial consideration and amount of the resulting Risk Premium Payment.

8. Other Income

Other income of $900,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 included $251,000 received from the federal government related to the Therapeutic Discovery Tax Credit pursuant to grants received under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and $649,000 received pursuant to a business interruption insurance claim the Company made in 2010. The Company will not receive any additional funds related to the Therapeutic Discovery Tax Credit or the business interruption insurance claim.

13

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In particular, statements contained in this Form 10-Q, including but not limited to, statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy and plan prospects, projected revenue or costs and objectives of management for future research, development or operations, are forward-looking statements. These statements relate to our future plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and may be identified by words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “targets,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “seeks,” “goals,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” and “continue” or similar words. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict, including those identified below, under Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and elsewhere herein. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.

Business Overview

Helicos BioSciences Corporation (“Helicos” or the “Company”) is a life sciences company focused on innovative genetic analysis technologies. We have developed a proprietary technology to enable the rapid analysis of large volumes of genetic material by directly sequencing single molecules of DNA or RNA. Our tSMS approach differs from current methods of sequencing DNA or RNA because it analyzes individual molecules of DNA directly instead of analyzing a large number of copies of the molecule which must be produced through complex sample preparation techniques. Our tSMS technology eliminates the need for costly, labor-intensive and time-consuming sample preparation techniques, such as amplification or cloning, which are required by other methods to produce a sufficient quantity of genetic material for analysis.

Our Helicos® Genetic Analysis Platform is designed to obtain sequencing information by repetitively performing a cycle of biochemical reactions on individual DNA or RNA molecules and imaging the results after each cycle. The platform consists of an instrument called the HeliScope™ Single Molecule Sequencer, an image analysis computer tower called the HeliScope™ Analysis Engine, associated reagents, which are chemicals used in the sequencing process, and disposable supplies. The information generated from using our tSMS products may lead to improved drug therapies, personalized medical treatments and more accurate diagnostics for cancer and other diseases.

We have had limited operations to date and our activities have consisted primarily of raising capital, conducting research and development and recruiting personnel. Accordingly, we are considered to be in the development stage at September 30, 2011, as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). Our fiscal year ends on December 31. We operate as one reportable segment. Helicos is a Delaware corporation and was incorporated on May 9, 2003.

We plan to deploy our limited resources by focusing on intellectual property monetization and research and development activities that are primarily related to grant-funded initiatives. In addition, we have scaled-down other research and development efforts in targeted areas that were designed to achieve tangible proof-of-concept goals connected with potential partnership opportunities with companies interested in next-generation sequencing, or to pursue other funding and strategic alternatives. As of the date of this filing, we do not have adequate resources and will continue to need to generate additional funding from various sources including contract sequencing service projects and government grants. We plan to defend our intellectual property rights through licensing and enforcement strategies. In this regard, we took several actions. We filed a lawsuit against Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc., Illumina, Inc. and Life Technologies Corporation (collectively, the “Defendants”) for patent infringement. The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, accuses the Defendants of infringing several patents and seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages. We are seeking a permanent injunction enjoining the Defendants from further infringement as well as monetary and punitive damages, costs and attorneys’ fees, interest and other relief as determined by the Court.

In connection with the Bridge Debt Financing and the Senior Debt and as security for our obligations under our contingency fee arrangement with outside intellectual property litigation counsel relating to the patent infringement lawsuit we filed against Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc., Illumina, Inc. and Life Technologies Corporation, we entered into a subordinated security agreement with outside intellectual property litigation counsel.  Pursuant to this arrangement, we agreed to grant outside intellectual property litigation counsel a second priority security interest in the patent infringement lawsuit. Under the terms of the contingency fee arrangement, we are obligated to pay outside intellectual property litigation

14

counsel up to 40% of the proceeds paid to us in connection with a settlement, judgment or other resolution of the Cause of Action (as defined in the contingency fee arrangement) or certain business transactions resulting from or relating to the patent infringement lawsuit. To date, those providing professional services in connection with this litigation on a contingent basis have expended significant resources in pursuit of this intellectual property monetization effort and are expected to continue to do so going forward We believe that the net proceeds generated by this litigation, if we are successful, could be substantial.  There is no assurance that we will be successful in this litigation, even in the event of a favorable outcome in this litigation there can be no assurance that there will be any proceeds remaining for common shareholders, as a result of various arrangements in place with professional service providers, bridge lenders, licensors and others.  We also continue to pursue our technology licensing program for our Single Molecule Sequencing and Sequencing-by-Synthesis intellectual property.

In March 2005, we entered into an agreement (as amended, the “License Agreement”) with Arizona Technology Enterprises (“AZTE”) in which AZTE granted us a worldwide, exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-bearing license, with the right to grant sublicenses, under a family of specified patents and patent applications (the “Licensed Patents”) exclusively licensed by AZTE from the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State University within a specified field of use.  On August 26, 2011, we entered into a First Amendment to the License Agreement (the “Amendment”) with AZTE.  The Amendment expanded the field under the License Agreement so that AZTE has now granted us the exclusive right and license under the Licensed Patents to the full extent of the entire scope of all claims within the Licensed Patents, in all fields of use.  AZTE’s license to us under the License Agreement (the “AZTE Licensed Rights”), gives us the rights to several issued patents covering sequencing-by-synthesis methods and a number of pending patent applications, now expressly includes detection methods that do not rely on the detection of optically-labeled nucleotides (the “Expanded Field”).  Under the terms of the Amendment, we will remain obligated to pay AZTE a specified percentage of income from our-granted sublicenses or other transfers of the AZTE Licensed Rights, including as part of any sale of the Company or litigation settlement.  Amounts we owe to AZTE will be a percentage of the proportionate value of the AZTE Licensed Rights in any such transaction.  We also agreed to make additional payments to AZTE for Company-granted sublicenses or other such transfers of the AZTE Licensed Rights within the Expanded Field. We retain our existing first right to initiate and pursue patent infringement suits involving the AZTE Licensed Rights.

Although we believe that the HeliScope Sequencer has unique utility across a broad array of MDx tests, due to significant financial and resource constraints and the lack of any significant improvement to our financial outlook, we have further delayed our efforts to bring high-value MDx tests based on our technology to the market through the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (“CLIA”) laboratory partnership. Nevertheless, we still believe that diagnostic applications may benefit from the specific features of the Helicos System, including the platform’s ability to sequence non-amplified natural DNA and RNA directly, provide quantitative accuracy, operate at a high throughput, utilize small sample quantities in simple and cost effective preparation methods, and demonstrate a lack of biases typically seen with sample amplification. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to deploy MDx tests or our technology through a CLIA laboratory, out-licensing or through our own efforts.

In order to further conserve our limited resources, during the second quarter of 2011, we further reduced our workforce by phasing out six business and research positions. These six positions were phased out during the third quarter of 2011 and ultimately reduced our total headcount to ten positions at the end of the third quarter. In addition, we entered into a new lease that reduced the size and associated expense of our leased facility in Cambridge, Massachusetts which will house our headquarters and scientific laboratory. We did not incur or pay out severance charges or lease exit costs in connection with the implementation of these changes. Notwithstanding these most recent workforce reductions and despite our previous reductions, restructurings, expense saving measures, and the Senior Debt and the Bridge Debt Financing (see Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements), we may not have sufficient funds to pursue our business priorities. We will require significant additional capital in December 2011 to continue our operations beyond the existing $2,000,000 committed portion of the Bridge Debt. As of the date of this filing, $666,667 has been drawn against this committed facility and $1,333,333 remains available to support ongoing operations. Potential sources of additional funding may include funding from the $2,000,000 uncommitted portion of the Bridge Debt Financing facility and/or from other sources that have not yet been identified, but there can be no assurance that any such funding will be available on reasonable terms, if at all. As a result, we are no longer able to remain current in making payments to trade vendors and other unsecured creditors when such payments are due and, despite the restructuring of our Senior Debt, this inability to remain current increases the likelihood that the Lenders could declare a default under the Senior Debt in the near-term, including with regard to solvency. For the period from November 2010 through April 2011, we made interest only payments on amounts outstanding on the Senior Debt. Beginning in May 2011, we resumed making monthly principal payments of approximately $0.25 million on our Senior Debt. The resumption of principal repayments will put additional pressure on our liquidity and capital resources. Workforce reductions, as well as curtailed financial resources, will further impact our ability to implement our business priorities. In addition, these constraints have caused us to significantly scale back service support and reagent supply to our current installed base. We have also significantly curtailed collaborative activities with other parties. Nevertheless, we believe that these actions will provide additional time to execute our business priorities.

15

In November 2010, our securities were delisted from the NASDAQ Global Market and the trading of our common stock was suspended before the opening of business on November 16, 2010, and a Form 25-NSE was subsequently filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 21, 2011 which removed our securities from listing and registration on The NASDAQ Stock Market. Our securities are currently traded under the symbol “HLCS” on the OTCQB which is a market tier for OTC-traded companies that are registered and reporting with the SEC.

Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors and it may require additional capital beyond our currently anticipated amounts. Any such required additional capital may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all, given our prospects, the current economic environment and restricted access to capital markets. The continued depletion of our resources may make future funding more difficult or expensive to obtain. Additional equity financing may be dilutive to our stockholders; debt financing, if available, may involve significant cash payment obligations and covenants that restrict our ability to operate as a business; and strategic partnerships may result in royalties or other terms which reduce its economic potential from any adjustments to our existing long-term strategy. If we are unable to execute our operations according to our plans or to obtain additional financing, we may be forced to cease operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets or the amount of reclassification of liabilities, or any adjustment that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Since inception, we have incurred losses and have not generated positive cash flows from operations. We expect losses to continue for a considerable period of time. These losses, among other things, have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our working capital, total assets and stockholders’ equity/(deficit). As of September 30, 2011 and November 1, 2011, we had $550,000 and $275,000, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents. We will require significant additional capital in December 2011 to continue our operations beyond the existing $2,000,000 committed portion of the Bridge Debt. As of the date of this filing, $666,667 has been drawn against this committed facility and $1,333,333 remains available to support ongoing operations. Potential sources of additional funding may include funding from the $2,000,000 uncommitted portion of the Bridge Debt Financing facility and/or from other sources that have not yet been identified, but there can be no assurance that any such funding will be available on reasonable terms, if at all. Including $1,333,333 of the available Bridge Debt facility, we have $1,608,333 in total available resources as of November 1, 2011 and we owe approximately $250,000 in monthly principal payments for each of December 2011 and January 2012 as well as a final $800,000 payment on the Senior Debt due in January 2012. If we are unable to execute our operations according to our plans or to obtain additional financing, we may be forced to cease operations. Our present capital resources are not sufficient to fund our planned operations for a twelve month period as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011; accordingly, our current financial resources raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The resumption of principal repayments under our loan and security agreement will further diminish our existing capital resources.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the financial statements. Actual amounts may differ from these estimates because of different assumptions or conditions. The December 31, 2010 consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by GAAP in the United States of America. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and our wholly-owned subsidiary. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

We were incorporated in Delaware in May 2003 under the name RareEvent Medical Corporation, renamed Newco LS6, Inc. in September 2003 and ultimately renamed Helicos BioSciences Corporation in November 2003. Our activities to date have consisted primarily of conducting research and development. Accordingly, we are considered to be in the development stage at September 30, 2011, as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). Our fiscal year ends on December 31, and we operate as one reportable segment. Our corporate offices are located at One Kendall Square, Building 200, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139.

Overview of Results of Operations

Three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011

Revenues.  Revenues during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 were as follows:

16

	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,									September 30,
($ in thousands)	2010		2011		Change					2010		2011		Change
Product revenue	$	214	$	116	$	(98	)	-46	%	$	341	$	454	$	113		33	%
Service revenue	—		385		385			100	%	—		1,029		1,029			100	%
Grant revenue	422		224		(198		)	-47	%	1,525		1,233		(292		)	-19	%
Total revenue	$	636	$	725	$	89		14	%	$	1,866	$	2,716	$	850		46	%

Product revenue.  We recognized $214,000 and $341,000 of product revenue during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $116,000 and $454,000 of product revenue during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Product revenue recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 consists primarily of revenue from the sale of proprietary reagents to customers.

As of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, we had deferred $7.3 million and $8.0 million of revenue, respectively, pursuant to multiple element, single accounting unit arrangements as we had not completed all obligations under these arrangements. These amounts have been received and future revenue recognition will have no effect on our cash balances.

Service revenue.  We had no service revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and $385,000 and $1.0 million of service revenue during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Service revenue is derived from sales of DNA and RNA sequencing services which commenced in the fourth quarter of 2010.

Grant revenue.  We recognized $422,000 and $1.5 million of grant revenue during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $224,000 and $1.2 million of grant revenue during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Grant revenue recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 relates to the reimbursement of expenses in connection with our government research grants. The decreases in grant revenue in both the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 is primarily due to the reduction of personnel resources to complete grant research work and the expiration of grants in 2011 from 2010. As of September 30, 2011, we continue to conduct research in connection with two ongoing grants.

Cost of product revenue.  We recorded $94,000 and $270,000 as cost of product revenue during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively and we recorded $70,000 and $201,000 as cost of product revenue during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Cost of product revenue consists of costs associated with the sale of proprietary reagents.

Research and development expenses.  Research and development expenses during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 were as follows:

	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,									September 30,
($ in thousands)	2010		2011		Change					2010		2011		Change
Research and development	$	4,945	$	490	$	(4,455	)	-90	%	$	13,207	$	2,625	$	(10,582	)	-80	%

Research and development expenses decreased by $4.5 million, or 90%, from the three months ended September 30, 2010 to the three months ended September 30, 2011. Research and development expenses decreased by $10.6 million, or 80%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The significant decreases in research and development expenses for both the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 is primarily due to a reduction in research and development personnel and research and development support costs in 2011 from 2010. Included in research and development expenses are costs associated with service and grant revenue.

Selling, general and administrative expenses.  Selling, general and administrative expenses during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 were as follows:

17

	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,									September 30,
($ in thousands)	2010		2011		Change					2010		2011		Change
Selling, general and administrative	$	2,347	$	785	$	(1,562	)	-67	%	$	9,112	$	3,177	$	(5,935	)	-65	%

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $1.6 million, or 67%, from the three months ended September 30, 2010 to the three months ended September 30, 2011. In comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to the nine months ended September 30, 2011, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $5.9 million, or 65%. The significant decreases in selling, general and administrative expenses in both the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 is primarily due to the reduction of personnel and related support costs in 2011 from 2010.

Interest income.  Interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 was as follows:

	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,									September 30,
($ in thousands)	2010		2011		Change					2010		2011		Change
Interest Income	$	1	$	—	$	(1	)	-100	%	$	18	$	—	$	(18	)	-100	%

The decrease in interest income from the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was due primarily to decreased cash balances.

Interest expense.  Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 was as follows:

	Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
	September 30,								September 30,
($ in thousands)	2010		2011		Change				2010		2011		Change
Interest Expense	$	106	$	151	$	45	42	%	$	451	$	544	$	93	21	%

The increase in interest expense from the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 is due to the amortization of deferred financing costs, related to the Bridge Debt and Notes in 2011.

Change in fair value of warrant liability.  Change in fair value of warrant liability for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 was as follows:

	Three Months Ended										Nine Months Ended
	September 30,										September 30,
($ in thousands)	2010			2011			Change				2010		2011			Change
Change in fair value of warrant liability	$	(130	)	$	(27	)	$	103	-79	%	$	3,117	$	(42	)	$	(3,159	)	-101	%

In connection with the September and December 2009 equity offerings, we issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 6,482,509 shares of common stock. As of September 30, 2011, 681,884 of these warrants remained unexercised. The fair value of the warrants is recorded in the liability section of the balance sheet and at September 30, 2010 and 2011 was estimated at $1.8 million and $70,000, respectively. The fair value of the warrant liability is determined at the end of each reporting period with the resulting gains and losses recorded as the change in fair value of warrant liability on the statement of operations.

For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, we realized a loss of $130,000 and a gain of $3.1 million, respectively, due to the change in the fair value of the warrant liability. These gains and losses are principally a result of changes in our stock price between December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2010. The losses recognized during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 were due to an increase in our common stock price during the respective periods. During the three month period ended September 30, 2011 there were no exercises of warrants. For the

18

nine months ended September 30, 2011, warrants for 1,263,215 shares of common stock were exercised. Futures changes in the fair value of the warrant liability will be due primarily to fluctuations in the value of our common stock and potential exercises of the remaining warrants outstanding.

Other Income

Other income of $900,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 included $251,000 received from the federal government related to the Therapeutic Discovery Tax Credit pursuant to grants received under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and $649,000 received pursuant to a business interruption insurance claim we made in 2010. We will not receive any additional funds related to the Therapeutic Discovery Tax Credit or the business interruption insurance claim. Both the Therapeutic Discovery Tax Credit and the business interruption insurance claim were received in the first quarter of 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have incurred losses since our inception in May 2003 and, as of September 30, 2011 we have an accumulated deficit of $189.4 million. We have financed our operations to date principally through the sale of common stock and preferred stock, including our IPO, two private placements of common stock and warrants, an underwritten offering of common stock and warrants, debt financing and interest earned on investments and revenue. Since inception, we have received net proceeds of $80.3 million through the issuance of common stock, including our IPO, private placements and an underwritten offering of common stock and warrants, $66.4 million from the issuance of preferred stock, $2.5 million in debt financing from a lender to finance equipment purchases, and $20.3 million in debt financing from lenders for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes and $11.7 million in revenue. Working capital deficit as of December 31, 2010 was $(5.6) million, consisting of $6.7 million in current assets and $12.3 million in current liabilities. Working capital deficit as of September 30, 2011 was $(7.5) million, consisting of $4.2 million in current assets and $11.7 million in current liabilities. Our cash and cash equivalents are held in interest-bearing cash accounts. Cash in excess of immediate requirements is invested in accordance with our investment policy, primarily to achieve liquidity and capital preservation.

The following table summarizes our net decrease in cash and cash equivalents for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
($ in thousands)	2010			2011
Net cash (used in) provided by:
Operating activities	$	(12,187	)	$	(821	)
Investing activities	(4		)	75
Financing activities	(1,889		)	(1,217		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(14,080	)	$	(1,963	)

Net cash used in operating activities was $12.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $0.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The $11.4 million decrease was primarily due to a $17.0 million decrease in the net loss, offset by a non cash decrease in depreciation expense of $1.0 million, a $3.9 million decrease in stock based compensation expense, a $2.6 million decrease in provisions on inventory and a $1.9 million decrease in the impairment of long-lived assets.  These decreases are partially offset by a $3.2 million increase in noncash expense related to the fair value of our warrant liability   Additionally, the net changes in operating assets and liabilities resulted in a $0.4 million increase in net cash provided by operating activities.

Net cash used in investing activities was $4,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $75,000 in net cash provided by investing activities relating to the sale of excess fixed assets in the third quarter for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Net cash used in financing activities was $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The $672,000 decrease was primarily due to a $820,000

19

decrease in debt payments related to the suspension of principal payments on our Senior Debt which resumed on May 1, 2011, and $158,000 in proceeds from the conversion of warrant shares into common stock.

Operating capital and capital expenditure requirements

As of September 30, 2011 and November 1, 2011, we had $550,000 and $275,000, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents. We will require significant additional capital to continue our operations in December 2011. Including the $1,333,333 of the available Bridge Debt facility, we have $1,608,333 in total available resources as of November 1, 2011 and we owe approximately $250,000 in monthly principal payments for each of December 2011 and January 2012 as well as an $800,000 payment for the Senior Debt due in January 2012. If we are unable to execute our operations according to our plans or to obtain additional financing, we may be forced to cease operations. Because our present capital resources are not sufficient to fund our planned operations for a twelve month period as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine month period ended September 30, 2011, our current financial resources raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Notwithstanding recent workforce reductions, restructurings, the Senior Debt and the Bridge Debt Financing, we may not have sufficient funds to pursue our business priorities. We will require significant additional capital in December 2011 to continue our operations. As a result, we are no longer able to remain current in making payments to trade vendors and other unsecured creditors when such payments are due and, despite the restructuring of our Senior Debt discussed above, this inability to remain current increases the likelihood that the Lenders could declare a default under the credit facility in the near-term, including with regard to solvency. For the period from November 2010 through April 2011, we made interest only payments on amounts outstanding on the Senior Debt. Beginning in May 2011, we resumed making monthly principal payments of approximately $0.25 million on our Senior Debt. The resumption of principal repayments will put additional pressure on our liquidity and capital resources. Workforce reductions, as well as curtailed financial resources, will further impact our ability to implement our business priorities. In addition, these constraints have caused us to significantly scale back service support and reagent supply to our current installed base. We have also significantly curtailed collaborative activities with other parties. Nevertheless, we believe that these actions will provide additional time to execute our business priorities.

Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors and we may require additional capital beyond our currently anticipated amounts. Any such required additional capital may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all, given our prospects, the current economic environment and restricted access to capital markets. The continued depletion of our resources may make future funding more difficult or expensive to obtain. Additional equity financing may be dilutive to our stockholders; debt financing, if available, may involve significant cash payment obligations and covenants that restrict our ability to operate as a business; and strategic partnerships may result in royalties or other terms which reduce our economic potential as a result of required adjustments to our existing long-term strategy. If we are unable to execute our operations according to our plans or to obtain additional financing, we may be forced to cease operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets or the amount of reclassification of liabilities, or any adjustment that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Failure to satisfy our capital requirements or any delay in doing so would have a material negative impact on our ability to continue as a going concern.

Through November 1, 2011, we have received cumulative sales orders for ten Helicos Systems. From our inception to date, we recognized revenue on three of the ten sales orders, respectively. We have shipped six units that have not met our revenue recognition criteria and one sales order unit was returned. A system that was installed at The Broad Institute, Inc. on a no-cost basis was returned to us in April 2011. In addition, we had one Helicos System at a leading academic institution for scientific and commercial evaluation which was returned to us in March 2011.

As of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, we had deferred revenue of $7.3 million and $8.0 million, respectively. Pursuant to the revenue recognition guidelines for multiple element, single accounting unit arrangements, we have continued to defer recognition of these amounts as revenue due to the uncertainty associated with our ability to deliver on all of the obligations under these arrangements. These amounts have been received and future revenue recognition will have no effect on our cash balances.

Our forecast for the period of time through which our financial resources will be adequate to support our operations, and the costs associated with our new business priorities are forward-looking statements and involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results could vary materially and negatively as a result of a number of factors, including the factors discussed in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We have based these estimates on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could consume our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect.

20

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with our business we are unable to estimate the exact amounts of capital outlays and operating expenditures necessary to sustain our operations. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

·any litigation related to defending our intellectual property or defending lawsuits that allege our actions infringe intellectual property of third parties;

·the success of our research and development efforts;

·the expenses we incur in marketing and selling our products or services;

·the revenue generated by future sales of our products or services;

·the timeliness of payments from our customers;

·the ability to structure arrangements with and make payments to our unsecured creditors;

·the ability to further restructure our Senior Debt arrangement in the future;

·the continued funding to the Bridge Debt Financing facility;

·the emergence of competing or complementary technological developments;

·the costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights;

·regulatory changes in our markets; and

·the terms and timing of any collaborative, licensing or other arrangements that we may establish.

Working capital deficit as of December 31, 2010 was $(5.6) million, consisting of $6.7 million in current assets and $12.2 million in current liabilities. Working capital deficit as of September 30, 2011 was $(7.5) million, consisting of $4.2 million in current assets and $11.7 million in current liabilities.

Contractual Obligations

A summary of our contractual obligations is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no material changes to our contractual obligations previously disclosed in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 other than the following: (a) we resumed making monthly principal payments of $0.25 million per month under our loan and security agreement in May 2011; (b) we executed a first amendment to our license agreement with Arizona Technology Enterprises (“AZTE”) in August 2011 (as discussed above in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and (c) we executed a seventh amendment to the lease of our headquarters space located at One Kendall Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts in September 2011 (as discussed above in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

License agreements and patents

We have fixed annual costs associated with license agreements into which we have entered. In addition, we may have to make contingent payments in the future upon the realization of certain milestones or royalties payable under these agreements.

Senior Debt and Bridge Debt Financing Facility

As of September 30, 2011, we owed aggregate payments, including interest, of $1.9 million pursuant to the Senior Debt which is due to be paid over the period ending January 1, 2012. In addition to interest being paid monthly, in May 2011 we resumed making monthly principal payments of approximately $0.25 million. Furthermore, a deferred payment of $800,000, which is included in the total aggregate payments owed on the Senior Debt, is due on January 1, 2012. The Senior Debt contains a subjective material adverse clause, which allows the Lenders to call the loans upon the occurrence of a material adverse event.

21

Also, pursuant to the Bridge Debt Financing, we borrowed $0.7 million through September 30, 2011 and have the ability to borrow an additional $1.3 million in monthly amounts of $333,333 through the due date of December 31, 2012. The purchasers of the Notes issued pursuant to the Bridge Debt Financing also have the right, but not the obligation, upon our request to purchase up to an additional $2,000,000 of Notes on or before December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, we owed principal and accrued interest aggregating $674,000 and $725,000, respectively.

As an inducement for the purchasers to purchase the Notes pursuant to the Bridge Debt Financing, we entered into a Risk Premium Payment Agreement in November 2010 with such purchasers (the “Risk Premium Agreement”). Under the terms of the Risk Premium Agreement, and with certain exceptions, we have agreed to pay the purchasers of the Notes the following portions of the consideration we receive (the “Payment Consideration”) in certain liquidity transactions: (i) until the aggregate Payment Consideration equals $10 million, 60% of the Payment Consideration; (ii) for aggregate Payment Consideration from $10 million to $20 million, 50% of the Payment Consideration; (iii) for aggregate Payment Consideration from $20 million to $30 million, 40% of the Payment Consideration; (iv) for aggregate Payment Consideration from $30 million to $40 million, 30% of the Payment Consideration; and (v) for aggregate Payment Consideration in excess of $40 million, 10% of the Payment Consideration (any such payments, “Risk Premium Payments”). For purposes of determining amounts payable under the Risk Premium Agreement, the Payment Consideration will not include amounts we use to first satisfy specified existing obligations, including obligations under the Loan Agreement, under professional contingency arrangements and obligations that may arise under existing technology license agreements (the “Existing IP Licensing Agreements”) between us and each of Arizona Technology Enterprises, Roche Diagnostics GMBH and Roche Diagnostics Corporation, and California Institute of Technology. For purposes of the Risk Premium Agreement and subject to various provisions therein, the following shall constitute Liquidity Transactions: (A) the receipt by us of any payments from third parties relating to our intellectual property portfolio, including payments received as a license or other settlement in patent infringement litigation brought by us (“IP Licensing Events”); (B) a merger of Helicos in which there is a change of control; and (C) the sale or exclusive license by us of all or substantially all of our assets or intellectual property.

In connection with the Bridge Debt Financing and the Senior Debt and as security for our obligations under our contingency fee arrangement with outside intellectual property litigation counsel relating to the patent infringement lawsuit we filed against Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc., Illumina, Inc. and Life Technologies Corporation, we entered into a subordinated security agreement with outside intellectual property litigation counsel pursuant to which we agreed to grant outside intellectual property litigation counsel a second priority security interest in the patent infringement lawsuit. Under the terms of the contingency fee arrangement, we are obligated to pay outside intellectual property litigation counsel up to 40% of the proceeds paid to us in connection with the settlement, judgment or other resolution of the Cause of Action (as defined in the contingency fee arrangement) or certain business transactions resulting from or relating to the patent infringement lawsuit.

In approving the transactions relating to the Bridge Debt Financing and the Senior Debt, our Board of Directors approved a management incentive plan pursuant to which participants in the plan, including Dr. Ivan Trifunovich and Mr. Jeffrey Moore, will be entitled to receive, in the aggregate, an amount equal to 7.5% of the payment consideration resulting from certain IP licensing events (the “Management Incentive Plan”). The specific terms of the Management Incentive Plan, administration and all payments to be made to management thereunder will be under the control and direction of our Board of Directors.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2011, we did not have any special purpose entities or engage in any off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

In our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, our critical accounting policies and estimates upon which our financial status depends were identified as those relating to inventory; revenue recognition; impairment of long-lived assets; allowance for doubtful accounts; stock-based compensation; and fair value of financial instruments. We reviewed our policies and determined that those policies remain our critical accounting policies for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. We did not make any changes in those policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

22

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. This guidance provides principles for allocation of consideration among its multiple-elements, allowing more flexibility in identifying and accounting for separate deliverables under an arrangement. The guidance introduces an estimated selling price method for valuing the elements of a bundled arrangement if vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence of selling price is not available, and significantly expands related disclosure requirements. This guidance is effective on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. We adopted this accounting guidance on a prospective basis in the first quarter of 2011 for new and materially modified revenue arrangements. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard clarifies the existing accounting guidance such that tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality, shall be excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition accounting standards. Accordingly, sales of these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition accounting standards or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of the arrangement consideration for each element of the arrangement. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2011. This adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2011, we adopted “Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements” which requires additional disclosure about the amounts of and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. In addition, effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010, which for us is January 1, 2011, this standard further requires an entity to present disaggregated information about activity in Level 3 fair value measurements on a gross basis, rather than as one net amount. As this accounting standard only requires enhanced disclosure, the adoption of this newly issued accounting standard did not impact our financial position or results of operations.

In May 2011, the FASB issued  “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendment to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs”. This newly issued accounting standard clarifies the application of certain existing fair value measurement guidance and expands the disclosure for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. This ASU is effective on a prospective basis for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, which for us is January 1, 2012. We do not expect that adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance for presentation of comprehensive income. This newly issued accounting standard (1) eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity; (2) requires the consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income; and (3) requires an entity to present reclassification adjustments on the face of the financial statements from other comprehensive income to net income. The amendments in this Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income nor do the amendments affect how earnings per share is calculated or presented. This ASU is required to be applied retrospectively and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011. As this accounting standard only requires enhanced disclosure, the adoption of this standard will not impact our financial position or results of operations.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our exposure to market risk is limited to our cash. The goals of our investment policy are preservation of capital, fulfillment of liquidity needs and fiduciary control of cash and investments. We also seek to maximize income from our investments without assuming significant risk. To achieve our goals, we maintain our cash in interest-bearing cash accounts. As all of our investments are cash deposits in a global bank, it is subject to minimal interest rate risk.

23

EFFECT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATES AND EXCHANGE RATE RISK MANAGEMENT

We conduct business operations outside of the United States primarily in Japan and to a lesser extent in certain European countries. The foreign denominated financial obligations that we are exposed to at this time in Japan are relatively short-term. Our practice in Europe has been to enter into US-dollar-denominated transactions with our customers. Therefore, any currency fluctuations will not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer (PEO) and principal financial officer (PFO), has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of September 30, 2011. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, we and our management recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our PEO and PFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable level of assurance.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

24

Part II—Other Information

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

On August 27, 2010, we filed a lawsuit against Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (“Pacific Biosciences”) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (CA. No. 10-735-SLR) alleging that Pacific Biosciences infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 7,645,596 (“‘596 Patent”), 7,037,687 (“‘687 Patent”), 7,169,560 (“‘560 Patent”), and 7,767,400 (“‘400 Patent”). On October 22, 2010, we filed an amended complaint naming Illumina, Inc. (“Illumina”) and Life Technologies Corporation (“Life Technologies”) as additional defendants. In the amended complaint, we further allege that Life Technologies infringes the ‘596 Patent, the ‘687 Patent, and the ‘560 Patent, and that Illumina infringes the ‘687 Patent, the ‘560 Patent, and U.S. Patent No. 7,593,109 (“‘109 Patent”). We accuse Pacific Biosciences of willful patent infringement based at least on its manufacture, use, and sale of its Single Molecule Real Time (“SMRT™”) DNA sequencing technology. We accuse Life Technologies of willful patent infringement based at least on its manufacture, use, and offer for sale of its Single Molecule Real-Time DNA Sequencing of a Quantum-dot Nanocrystal technology for single molecule sequencing of DNA. We accuse Illumina of willful patent infringement based at least on its manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, and importation of its sequencing technology for single molecule sequencing of DNA including its Genome Analyzer, HiSeq 2000, and its Sq Module in combination with its iScan and HiScan platforms. We are seeking a permanent injunction enjoining each of the defendants from further infringement as well as compensatory and punitive damages, costs, and attorneys’ fees, interest, and other relief as determined by the Court. On January 27, 2011, Pacific Biosciences submitted requests to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “Patent Office”) for inter parties reexamination of the ‘687 Patent, the ‘560 Patent, the ‘596 Patent and the ‘400 Patent and are seeking a determination that one or more of the claims of those patents are invalid. The Patent Office granted the requests for reexamination of the ‘400 Patent and the ‘596 Patent on March 10, 2011, the request for reexamination of the ‘560 Patent on March 31, 2011, and the request for reexamination of the ‘687 Patent on April 13, 2011, and issued office actions rejecting all claims of the patents. The Patent Office issued Actions Closing Prosecution in the reexamination proceedings for the ‘560 Patent, the ‘687 Patent, and the ‘596 Patent on September 8, October 5, and October 20, 2011, respectively. All four reexaminations remain pending. On April 25, 2011, Pacific Biosciences moved the Court to stay the litigation pending the outcome of the patent-reexamination proceedings. Life Technologies later joined the motion. On June 23, 2011, Life Technologies moved the Court to drop or sever and stay our claims against it. The Court has not yet entered an order on either of these motions. The Court conducted a scheduling conference on February 9, 2011 and set a trial date of September 10, 2012. Discovery opened in the matter on January 12, 2011, and production of documents was completed on July 15, 2011.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

The Company cautions investors that its future performance and results and, therefore, any forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Various factors may cause the Company’s future results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. These factors were disclosed, but are not limited to, the items in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, Part I, Item 1A. There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I,Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Upon the termination of employees during the quarter ended September 30, 2011, unvested restricted shares were forfeited. The following table provides information about our forfeited restricted shares for the three months ended September 30, 2011:

Period	Total Number of Shares Forfeited
July 1 to 31, 2011	37,500
August 1 to 31, 2011	75,000
September 1 to 30, 2011	75,000
Total	187,500

Item 3.  Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

25

Item 4.  (Removed and Reserved)

Item 5.  Other Information

None.

Item 6.  Exhibits

The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits are filed as part of this report and such Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.

26

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION
Dated: November 16, 2011	By:	/s/ IVAN TRIFUNOVICH
	Name:	Ivan Trifunovich
	Title:	President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Dated: November 16, 2011	By:	/s/ JEFFREY R. MOORE
	Name:	Jeffrey R. Moore
	Title:	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

27

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description
10.1	First Amendment to License Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2011, by and between Arizona Science and Technology Enterprises LLC and Helicos BioSciences Corporation*
10.2	Seventh Amendment to Lease, dated as of September 20, 2011, by and between RB Kendall Fee, LLC and Helicos BioSciences Corporation (incorporated by reference herein to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 22, 2011)
31.1	Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
101	The following materials from Helicos BioSciences Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (iv) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

* Confidential treatment has been requested for certain provisions of this Exhibit pursuant to Rule 406 promulgated under the Securities Act

28

EX-10.1

Exhibit 10.1

FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

LICENSE AGREEMENT

Between

Arizona Science and Technology Enterprises LLC,
dba Arizona Technology Enterprises,
ASU SkySong, 1475 N. Scottsdale Rd., Suite 200
Scottsdale, AZ  85257-3538

(hereinafter referred to as “AZTE”)

and

HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION,
One Kendall Square, Ste. B2002,
Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

(hereinafter referred to as “HELICOS”)

PREAMBLE

AZTE and HELICOS are parties to that certain License Agreement having an effective date of March 16, 2005 (the “License Agreement”).  HELICOS and AZTE now desire to amend the License Agreement as set forth in this amendment agreement (this “Amendment”) effective as of August 23, 2011.  Accordingly, AZTE and HELICOS agree as follows:

CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT WERE OMITTED AND REPLACED WITH “[***]”. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 24b-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

1.   Definitions

Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning provided in the License Agreement.

2.   Amendment of License Agreement

2.1Section 1 of the License Agreement shall be amended by adding the following new text to the end of Section 1:

“1.13“Amendment Effective Date” shall mean August 23, 2011.

1.14“Expanded Field” shall mean any and all activities that fall within the scope of, or constitute the practice of, the Licensed Patents, but that are not included within the Field, including without limitation, nucleic acid sequencing-by-synthesis performed without reliance on detection of optically-labeled nucleotides.”

2.2Section 1.2 of the License Agreement shall be amended by adding the following text to the end of Section 1.2:

“HELICOS has one HELICOS Affiliate existing as of the Amendment Effective Date, a wholly-owned subsidiary named Helicos Biosciences Securities Corporation.  Notwithstanding the foregoing,[***].”

2.3Section 2.1 shall be amended by adding the following new text to the end of the last sentence in Section 2.1:

“and, as of the Amendment Effective Date, in the Expanded Field.  Without limiting the foregoing grant of rights, and for avoidance of doubt, the parties acknowledge and agree that the license granted in this Section 2.1 conveys to HELICOS an exclusive right and license under the Licensed Patents, to the full extent of the entire scope of all claims within the Licensed Patents, in all fields of use as of the Amendment Effective Date.”

2.4Section 2.2 shall be amended by deleting such Section in its entirety and replacing it with the following new text:

“HELICOS shall promptly provide AZTE with a complete copy of any sublicense granted under this Agreement, irrespective of whether such sublicense was granted before, or is granted after, the Amendment Effective Date. Commencing on the Amendment Effective Date, HELICOS may grant a sublicense under this Agreement only if it has given written notice to AZTE of the proposed terms and conditions of that sublicense at least ten days prior to entering into such sublicense (and, solely with respect to agreements entered into in connection with the settlement of a legal proceeding, obtained AZTE’s prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed).

2.5Section 2 shall be further amended by adding the following text as a new Section 2.3:

CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT WERE OMITTED AND REPLACED WITH “[***]”. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 24b-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

2

HELICOS hereby unconditionally waives and releases AZTE with respect to any and all claims and causes of action of any nature, known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, sounding in tort or contract, under common law or otherwise, at law or in equity, that HELICOS has, may have, or could have against AZTE relating to, arising from or in connection with, directly or indirectly, AZTE’s interactions with any third parties prior to the Amendment Effective Date relating to a possible grant of a license, covenant not to sue, or similar rights in the Expanded Field.

2.6Section 3.1(d) shall be amended by deleting such Section in its entirety and replacing it with the following new text:

“(d)Subject to allocation as set forth in Section 3.1(d)(C) below if applicable, HELICOS shall pay to AZTE:

(A)As to amounts received in consideration for rights granted to the Licensed Patents in the Field [***] revenue received by HELICOS and HELICOS Affiliates, including, without limitation, any [***]; and

(B)As to amounts received in consideration for rights granted in a Covered Transaction (as hereinafter defined in this Section 3.1(d)(B)), (i) the [***] in connection with [***]; and (ii) [***] revenue received, by HELICOS and HELICOS Affiliates including, without limitation, [***]; provided however, that in the event [***], then prior to the [***], HELICOS shall [***].

As used in Section 3.1(d)(B), Covered Transaction shall mean any transaction (or series of related transactions) whatsoever that includes a conveyance of rights to any Licensed Patent [***] and/or to any HELICOS Patent (as hereinafter defined in Section 3.1(d)(C)), including without limitation, any license, sublicense, cross-license, or assignment, or any merger, acquisition, sale or similar change of control transaction of HELICOS or a HELICOS Affiliate (a merger, acquisition, sale or similar change of control transaction of HELICOS or a HELICOS Affiliate is hereinafter a “Change of Control Transaction”).  All consideration conveyed in connection with a Covered Transaction shall be subject to clause (i) of Section 3.1(d)(B), including without limitation, [***].  The parties acknowledge and agree, for the avoidance of doubt, that [***] shall be [***].

(C)If HELICOS (i) enters into a transaction with a third party that triggers an obligation of HELICOS to make a payment to AZTE under Section 3.1(d)(A) or clause (ii) of Section 3.1(d)(B), and such transaction conveys rights to one or more patent applications or patents owned or controlled by HELICOS and that are not part of the Licensed Patents (the “HELICOS Patents”), and, in the case of a Change of Control Transaction, also transfers assets to the third party in addition to the Licensed Patents and the HELICOS Patents (“Non-Patent Assets”), or (ii) recovers any amounts in connection with the settlement of a legal proceeding, where either (a) the legal proceeding, at the time of the recovery, includes both a claim that a third party has infringed any Licensed Patent and a claim that a third party has infringed a HELICOS Patent, or (b) where the settlement includes both a grant of any license or other rights

CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT WERE OMITTED AND REPLACED WITH “[***]”. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 24b-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

3

under a Licensed Patent and a grant of any license or other rights under a HELICOS Patent, irrespective of whether the legal proceeding itself, at the time of the recovery, includes both a claim that a third party has infringed any Licensed Patent and a claim that a third party has infringed a HELICOS Patent (each such transaction, recovery, or settlement referred to hereinafter as a “Patent Recovery Event”), then all of the consideration received in connection with that Patent Recovery Event shall be allocated between the HELICOS Patents (and, in the case of a Change of Control Transaction, the Non-Patent Assets), on the one hand, and the Licensed Patents, on the other hand, based on their relative value in the Patent Recovery Event, taking into account factors that one would reasonably determine to be relevant under the circumstances, which may include some or all of the following factors (along with any other relevant factors not listed herein): (1) the priority date of the relevant patents, (2) whether one party’s patent(s) dominate the other party’s patent(s) with respect to subject matter that is relevant to current or planned commercial activities, (3) the anticipated length of the remaining patent life of the relevant patents, (4) the geographic scope of the relevant patents, (5) with respect to a settlement referenced in clause (ii) of this Section 3.1(d)(C), the amount resulting from the infringing conduct that is specifically attributable either to the HELICOS Patents or the Licensed Patents and (6) in the case of a Change of Control Transaction, the reasonable value of the Non-Patent Assets (which shall be added to the reasonable value of the HELICOS Patents for purposes of determining their combined value relative to the Licensed Patents for purposes of the allocation described in this Section 3.1(d)(C)). There shall be no allocation made under this Section 3.1(d)(C) for any recovery of a judgment entered in a legal proceeding where such recovery is subject to Section 6.1.  Any allocation between the Licensed Patent and the HELICOS Patents of the consideration received in connection with a Patent Recovery Event, for example, in a license agreement or settlement agreement entered into by HELICOS and a third party, shall not be considered in determining the allocation to be made under this Section 3.1(d)(C).  [***] in connection with a [***].  HELICOS and AZTE shall negotiate in good faith towards an allocation of value as set forth above promptly following the consummation of a relevant Patent Recovery Event.  If HELICOS and AZTE are unable to agree upon a reasonable allocation within thirty (30) days thereafter (such period being subject to extension as the parties may agree), then the determination shall be resolved in accordance with the process set forth in Appendix B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.  For avoidance of doubt, the parties acknowledge and agree that [***], and shall [***].”

2.7Section 3.1 shall be further amended by adding the following text as a new Section 3.1(e):

“(e)For avoidance of doubt, the parties acknowledge and agree that, pursuant to Section 3.1(d) and Section 6.1(a), HELICOS shall pay up to a maximum of [***] in the aggregate [***].  All payments [***] in immediately available funds [***].  Once HELICOS has paid AZTE the total amount of [***], HELICOS shall have [***].”

2.8Section 3.1 shall be further amended by adding the following text as a new Section 3.1(f):

CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT WERE OMITTED AND REPLACED WITH “[***]”. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 24b-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

4

“(f)All fees, payments, and royalties paid by HELICOS under this Agreement shall be non-refundable, non-recoverable, and non-creditable [***] for any reason whatsoever, including without limitation, the outcome of any proceeding, litigation, or challenge concerning the Licensed Patents.

2.9Section 6.1 shall be amended by deleting such Section in its entirety and replacing it with the following new text:

“Each party shall notify the other promptly in writing upon becoming aware of any third-party infringement of any Licensed Patent.  HELICOS shall have the sole and exclusive first right, but not the obligation, at its expense and using counsel of its choice, to initiate a legal proceeding in respect of any such third-party infringement of any Licensed Patent, including without limitation, any infringing activity that occurred prior to the Amendment Effective Date.  If HELICOS initiates any such legal proceeding, HELICOS shall not make any admission or concession that any Licensed Patent (or any claim of any Licensed Patent) is invalid or unenforceable, without obtaining AZTE’s prior written consent (which consent may be withheld for any reason so long as it would not require HELICOS to serve a pleading that violates Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure).  At the reasonable request of HELICOS, AZTE hereby agrees to be named as a plaintiff in any such legal proceeding if required for HELICOS to maintain such legal proceeding under applicable law at the sole expense of HELICOS.  HELICOS shall not enter into any settlement of any legal proceeding subject to this Section 6 without the prior written consent of AZTE, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.  HELICOS shall indemnify AZTE for any liability, damage, loss, fees, costs, or expenses awarded or imposed against, or incurred by, AZTE (including its parent ASU Foundation), Arizona Board of Regents or Arizona State University, or directors, regents, officers or employees of any of the foregoing (including all awards or judgments, whether arising from cross claims, counterclaims, third-party claims or otherwise, and whether in the same or different proceeding from the one initiated or prosecuted by HELICOS), arising out of, in connection with, or relating to any such legal proceeding, and all reasonable out-of-pocket attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with any such proceeding.  Notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, the parties acknowledge and agree, for the avoidance of doubt, that the indemnification obligation set forth in this Section 6.1 shall not include an obligation to indemnify any person or entity for any diminution of the value of any Licensed Patent.  AZTE shall reasonably cooperate with and provide all assistance reasonably requested by HELICOS in any legal proceeding initiated by HELICOS hereunder; provided that HELICOS pays AZTE for any reasonable costs and expenses incurred by AZTE or otherwise due in connection with providing such assistance, such as any reasonable, out-of-pocket legal fees incurred by AZTE or its parent or affiliates arising or resulting from any such proceeding.  Any damages, costs, awards, fees or recoveries paid by any third party in connection with any legal proceeding initiated or prosecuted at HELICOS’s expense (whether by way of settlement or otherwise) shall be divided between HELICOS and AZTE as follows:

(a)As to (i) any legal proceeding that includes a claim that a third party has infringed any Licensed Patent in the Expanded Field (irrespective of whether that legal proceeding

CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT WERE OMITTED AND REPLACED WITH “[***]”. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 24b-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

5

also includes a claim that a third party has infringed any HELICOS Patent or any Licensed Patent within the Field), which claim has not been involuntarily dismissed pursuant to a contested dispositive motion or voluntarily dismissed with the prior written consent of AZTE, or (ii) any settlement or other disposition of a legal proceeding that includes a grant of any license or other rights under any Licensed Patent within the Expanded Field (irrespective of whether the legal proceeding itself includes allegations of activities within the Expanded Field, and irrespective of whether the settlement or other disposition involves a grant of any license or other rights under any HELICOS Patent or any Licensed Patent within the Field), AZTE shall receive [***] paid in the aggregate [***], with the sole and exclusive exception of any amounts expressly allocated only to HELICOS Patents in one or more judgments on the merits entered other than through an agreement of the parties to the legal proceeding; [***].  As provided in Section 3.1(e), HELICOS shall have no obligation to pay to AZTE more than [***] in the aggregate [***].

(b)As to all damages, costs, awards, fees or recoveries paid by any third party in connection with any legal proceeding initiated or prosecuted at HELICOS’s expense [***], (i) HELICOS shall recover an amount equal to all out-of-pocket legal fees and expenses incurred or payable in connection with prosecuting or defending the Licensed Patents in such legal proceeding (including amounts that have already been paid and amounts that are contingent on a certain result or that otherwise become due and payable in connection with the resolution of the matter, but not including legal fees paid by HELICOS to or for the benefit of AZTE or its related entities in connection with such legal proceeding under this Section 6.1); and (ii) of the remainder, subject to any allocation provided for in Section 3.1(d)(C), HELICOS shall receive [***] and AZTE shall receive [***]; provided, however, that if, in connection with the resolution of such legal proceeding, HELICOS grants a license, a covenant not to sue, or similar ongoing rights under any of the Licensed Patents to such third party, or is acquired by such third party in a Change of Control Transaction, then (a) HELICOS shall receive [***] of all amounts that are payable within ninety (90) days after the closing of such transaction (including obtaining all shareholder and governmental approvals required in connection therewith); and (b) HELICOS shall receive [***] and AZTE shall receive [***] of all such proceeds as they become payable in connection with such transaction after such ninety (90) day period.

(c)The parties acknowledge and agree, for avoidance of doubt, that any damages, costs, awards, fees or recoveries paid by any third party in connection with any single legal proceeding initiated or prosecuted at HELICOS’s expense (whether by way of settlement or otherwise) that involves activities that are within the Expanded Field and activities that are within the Field shall be shared by the parties [***].  The parties further acknowledge and agree, for avoidance of doubt, that (i) no amounts recovered by HELICOS from a judgment in a legal proceeding that is otherwise subject to this Section 6.1, and in which all of the Licensed Patents asserted in such legal proceeding were found to be invalid, unenforceable or not infringed, shall be [***], (ii) all amounts recovered by HELICOS from a judgment in a legal proceeding that is otherwise subject to this Section 6.1, and in which all of the HELICOS Patents asserted in such legal

CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT WERE OMITTED AND REPLACED WITH “[***]”. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 24b-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

6

proceeding were found to be invalid, unenforceable or not infringed, [***] and (iii) any amounts allocated to one or more Licensed Patents in a judgment from a legal proceeding that is otherwise subject to this Section 6.1 [***], and any amounts allocated to one or more HELICOS Patents in such judgment [***].

2.10Section 7 shall be amended by adding the following text as a new Section 7.5:

“The licenses granted under this Agreement may be terminated by AZTE in the event HELICOS (or any entity or person acting on its behalf) initiates any proceeding or otherwise asserts any claim challenging the validity, patentability, or enforceability of any Licensed Patent in any court, administrative agency, or other forum.”

2.11The following text shall be added to the Agreement as a new Appendix B:

“Appendix B

(i)Arbitration will be conducted in New York, New York under the rules of the American Arbitration Association then in effect for the resolution of commercial disputes, except as modified herein.  The parties will appoint a panel of three (3) arbitrators, one to be selected by HELICOS, one to be selected by AZTE, and one to be selected by mutual agreement.  If HELICOS and AZTE are unable to agree on a third arbitrator, the arbitrator will be chosen by the mutual agreement of the two arbitrators selected by the parties.

(ii)Within thirty (30) days after such matter is referred to arbitration, each party will provide the arbitrators with its proposed allocation, together with a written memorandum in support of such proposed allocation (not to exceed 5000 words), including its analysis of the relevant factors, as well as documentary evidence in support thereof and the arbitrators shall promptly provide each party’s proposed allocation, analysis and evidence to the other party.

(iii)Within thirty (30) days after a party submits its proposed materials to the arbitrators, the other party shall have the right to respond thereto (but neither party may change its proposed allocation). The response (not to exceed 3000 words) and any material in support thereof shall be provided to the arbitrators and the other party.

(iv)The arbitrators shall have the right to meet with the parties as necessary to inform the arbitrators’ determination.  Within thirty (30) days of the receipt by the arbitrators of both parties’ responses, the arbitrators shall select the proposed allocation that most accurately reflects the relative value of the HELICOS Patents and the Licensed Patents in the Patent Recovery Event.  The arbitrators must select an allocation that was proposed by one or the other of the parties; the arbitrators may not combine or otherwise modify the parties’ proposed allocations.  Upon selection of an allocation by the arbitrators, such allocation shall be binding and enforceable on the parties.

CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT WERE OMITTED AND REPLACED WITH “[***]”. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 24b-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

7

(v)The arbitrators shall be directed to make their decision within one hundred and eighty (180) days after the date on which the parties were obligated to arbitrate the allocation issue.”

3.   Effect of Amendment; Confirmation of Terms

3.1This Amendment shall constitute an amendment of the License Agreement entered into in accordance with Section 9.5 of the License Agreement.

3.2Except as expressly set forth herein, the License Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth therein.

4.   Confidentiality

4.1AZTE and HELICOS agree that the content of this Amendment shall be treated confidentially by both AZTE and HELICOS in accordance with the requirements of Article 10 of the License Agreement, subject to any requirements of the Arizona public records laws applicable to AZTE or ASU.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, AZTE consents to the filing of this Amendment by HELICOS with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

5.   Notices

Any notice required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be considered properly given if sent by mail, facsimile, or courier delivery to the respective address of each party as follows:

If to HELICOS:	HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION One Kendall Square, Suite B2002 Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A. Attn: President Fax: 617-264-1700
If to AZTE:	Arizona Technology Enterprises ASU SkySong 1475 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 200 Scottsdale, AZ 85257-3538 Attn: CEO and General Counsel Fax: 480-884-1984

Agreed as of August 23, 2011:

CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT WERE OMITTED AND REPLACED WITH “[***]”. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 24b-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

8

HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORP.			ARIZONA TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISES
By:	/s/ Ivan Trifunovich		By:	/s/ Augustine Cheng
	Name:	Ivan Trifunovich		Name:			Augustine Cheng
	Title:	President & Chief Executive Officer		Title:	Chief Executive Officer
	Date:	August 23, 2011		Date:		August 23, 2011

CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT WERE OMITTED AND REPLACED WITH “[***]”. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 24b-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

9

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Ivan Trifunovich, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Helicos BioSciences Corporation;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 16, 2011	/s/ IVAN TRIFUNOVICH
	Ivan Trifunovich
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey R. Moore, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Helicos BioSciences Corporation;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 16, 2011	/s/ JEFFREY R. MOORE
	Jeffrey R. Moore
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Helicos BioSciences Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we Ivan Trifunovich, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company and Jeffrey R. Moore, the Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge that:

(1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2)the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 16, 2011	/s/ IVAN TRIFUNOVICH
	Ivan Trifunovich
	Ivan Trifunovich
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)
Dated: November 16, 2011	/s/ JEFFREY R. MOORE
	Jeffrey R. Moore
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		102 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011
Product revenue	$ 116	$ 214	$ 454	$ 341	$ 4,116
Service revenue	385		1,029		1,029
Grant revenue	224	422	1,233	1,525	6,543
Total revenue	725	636	2,716	1,866	11,688
Costs and expenses
Cost of product revenue	70	94	201	270	2,163
Research and development	490	4,945	2,625	13,207	111,288
Selling, general and administrative	785	2,347	3,177	9,112	74,119
Impairment of long-lived assets		1,894	0	1,894	1,894
Total costs and expenses	1,345	9,280	6,003	24,483	189,464
Operating loss	(620)	(8,644)	(3,287)	(22,617)	(177,776)
Interest income		1		18	4,153
Interest expense	(151)	(106)	(544)	(451)	(5,050)
Change in fair value of warrant liability	(27)	(130)	(42)	3,117	6,035
Other income	0		900		1,372
Net loss	(798)	(8,879)	(2,973)	(19,933)	(171,266)
Beneficial conversion feature related to Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock	0				(18,140)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$ (798)	$ (8,879)	$ (2,973)	$ (19,933)	$ (189,406)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders per share--basic and diluted (in dollars per share)	$ (0.01)	$ (0.11)	$ (0.03)	$ (0.25)
Weighted average number of common shares used in computation--basic (in shares)	85,418,524	79,459,909	85,503,181	78,193,483
Weighted average number of common shares used in computation--diluted (in shares)	85,418,524	79,459,909	85,503,181	78,193,483

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (USD $) In Thousands	9 Months Ended		102 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$ (2,973)	$ (19,933)	$ (171,266)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	8	1,019	9,066
Amortization of lease incentive		(4)	(474)
Common stock issued for licenses	0		147
Stock-based compensation expense	780	4,704	20,594
Noncash license fee			54
Noncash interest expense related to debt and warrants	383	193	1,520
Noncash (income) expense related to change in fair value of warrant liability	42	(3,117)	(6,035)
Provisions on inventory		2,570	5,846
Gain (loss) on disposal of property and equipment		(23)	(7)
Impairment of long-lived assets	0	1,894	1,894
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(50)	651	(317)
Unbilled receivable	479	73	25
Inventory		(1,013)	(11,226)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	91	42	(541)
Deferred revenue	666	1,514	7,893
Accounts payable	(215)	(188)	579
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	(32)	(569)	3,029
Other long-term liabilities			557
Net cash used in operating activities	(821)	(12,187)	(138,662)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment	0	(37)	(9,541)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets	75	33	108
Purchases of short-term investments			(34,709)
Maturities of short-term investments			34,709
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	75	(4)	(9,433)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from debt issuances	0		22,256
Payments on debt	(1,230)	(2,050)	(21,110)
Payments of debt issuance costs			(453)
Proceeds from initial public offering	0		49,011
Deferred initial public offering costs			(1,838)
Proceeds from issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock, net of issuance costs	0		66,405
Proceeds from bridge loan			1,017
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and common stock warrants	0	158	32,807
Proceeds from issuance of restricted common stock			338
Proceeds from exercise of warrants	13		(91)
Payments to employees for cancelled restricted common stock			197
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	0	3	106
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(1,217)	(1,889)	148,645
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(1,963)	(14,080)	550
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	2,513	15,930
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$ 550	$ 1,850	$ 550

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (USD $) In Thousands	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 550	$ 2,513
Accounts receivable	317	267
Unbilled receivables	225	704
Inventory	2,935	2,935
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	162	306
Total current assets	4,189	6,725
Property and equipment, net	51	126
Other assets	82	152
Total assets	4,322	7,003
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	579	794
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	1,356	1,388
Deferred revenue	7,980	7,314
Current portion of long-term debt	1,767	2,779
Total current liabilities	11,682	12,275
Long-term debt, net of current portion	725	674
Warrants	70	220
Total liabilities	12,477	13,169
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' deficit
Preferred stock: par value $0.001 per share; 5,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011; no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011
Common stock: par value $0.001 per share; 120,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011; 86,557,606 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 87,233,989 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011	87	87
Additional paid-in capital	181,164	180,180
Deficit accumulated during the development stage	(189,406)	(186,433)
Total stockholders' deficit	(8,155)	(6,166)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$ 4,322	$ 7,003

XML

Other Income

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Other Income

Other Income

8. Other Income

Other income of $900,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 included $251,000 received from the federal government related to the Therapeutic Discovery Tax Credit pursuant to grants received under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and $649,000 received pursuant to a business interruption insurance claim the Company made in 2010. The Company will not receive any additional funds related to the Therapeutic Discovery Tax Credit or the business interruption insurance claim.

XML

Net Loss per Share

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Net Loss per Share

Net Loss per Share

4. Net Loss per Share

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The Company’s potential dilutive shares, which include outstanding common stock options, unvested restricted stock and warrants, have not been included in the computation of diluted net loss per share for both periods as the result would be antidilutive. Such potentially dilutive shares are excluded when the effect would be to reduce net loss per share. Because the Company reported a net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011, all potential common shares have been excluded from the computation of the dilutive net loss per share for all periods.  Such potential common shares consist of the following:

	September 30,
	2010	2011
Stock options	2,514,108	990,389
Unvested restricted stock	2,010,888	1,906,381
Warrants	27,952,358	22,653,964
	32,477,354	25,550,734

XML

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Nov. 01, 2011
Document and Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	HELICOS BIOSCIENCES CORP
Entity Central Index Key	0001274563
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2011
Amendment Flag	true
Amendment Description	This amendment on Form 10-Q/A is being filed to amend Helicos BioSciences Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2011 (the "Original Filing"). The purpose of the amendment is to correct a typographical error which resulted in the inadvertent omission of the word "no" from two sentences in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The error appeared on page 6 of the Original Filing, in the second-to-last sentence of the fifth paragraph under "Note 1. Nature of the Business and Basis of Presentation." This amendment corrects the sentence to read as follows: "There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in this litigation, even in the event of a favorable outcome in this litigation there can be no assurance that there will be any proceeds remaining for common shareholders, as a result of various arrangements in place with professional service providers, bridge lenders, licensors and others." The error also appeared at the top of page 15 of the Original Filing, in the third full sentence beginning "There is no assurance . . ." This amendment corrects the sentence to read as follows: "There is no assurance that we will be successful in this litigation, even in the event of a favorable outcome in this litigation there can be no assurance that there will be any proceeds remaining for common shareholders, as a result of various arrangements in place with professional service providers, bridge lenders, licensors and others." We are not amending any other part of the Original Filing. This Form 10-Q/A speaks as of the date of the Original Filing and does not reflect events that occurred subsequent to the date of the Original Filing.
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		87,234,155
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The Company’s significant accounting policies were identified in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

Revenue recognition

Government research grants that provide for payments to the Company for work performed are recognized as revenue when the related expenses are incurred.

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with accounting guidance on revenue recognition in financial statements and accounting for multiple element revenue arrangements. This guidance requires that persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists, delivery of goods occurs through transfer of title and risk and rewards of ownership, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company also follows accounting guidance on how to account for arrangements that involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets.

In past instances and according to accounting guidance on revenue recognition in financial statements and accounting for multiple element revenue arrangements existent at the time of the transactions, where the Company sold instruments with a related installation obligation, the Company allocated revenue between the instrument and the installation based on relative fair value at the time of the sale. The instrument revenue will be recognized when title and risk of loss passes. The installation revenue will be recognized when the installation is performed. If fair value was not available for any undelivered element, revenue for all elements was deferred until delivery and installation are complete. In instances where the Company sells an instrument with specified acceptance criteria, the Company will defer revenue recognition until such acceptance has been obtained.

Revenue from service contracts sold in conjunction with the sale of equipment is recognized ratably over the service period and revenue from contract sequencing services is recognized when results of the Company’s testing are delivered to and accepted by the customer.

The costs of service and grant revenue are included in research and development expense.

As of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, the Company had deferred revenue of $7.3 million and $8.0 million, respectively. Pursuant to the revenue recognition guidelines for multiple element, single accounting unit arrangements, the Company has continued to defer recognition of these amounts as revenue due to the uncertainty associated with the Company’s ability to deliver on all of the obligations under these arrangements. These amounts have been received and future revenue recognition will have no effect on the Company’s cash balances.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. This guidance provides principles for allocation of consideration among its multiple-elements, allowing more flexibility in identifying and accounting for separate deliverables under an arrangement. The guidance introduces an estimated selling price method for valuing the elements of a bundled arrangement if vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence of selling price is not available, and significantly expands related disclosure requirements. This guidance is effective on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company adopted this accounting guidance on a prospective basis in the first quarter of 2011 for new and materially modified revenue arrangements. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard clarifies the existing accounting guidance such that tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality, shall be excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition accounting standards. Accordingly, sales of these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition accounting standards or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of the arrangement consideration for each element of the arrangement. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2011. This adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2011, the Company adopted “Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements” which requires additional disclosure about the amounts of and reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. In addition, effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010, which for the Company is January 1, 2011, this standard further requires an entity to present disaggregated information about activity in Level 3 fair value measurements on a gross basis, rather than as one net amount. As this accounting standard only requires enhanced disclosure, the adoption of this newly issued accounting standard did not impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In May 2011, the FASB issued  “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendment to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs”. This newly issued accounting standard clarifies the application of certain existing fair value measurement guidance and expands the disclosure for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. This ASU is effective on a prospective basis for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, which for the Company is January 1, 2012. The Company does not expect that adoption of this standard will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In June 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance for presentation of comprehensive income. This newly issued accounting standard (1) eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity; (2) requires the consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income; and (3) requires an entity to present reclassification adjustments on the face of the financial statements from other comprehensive income to net income. The amendments in this Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income nor do the amendments affect how earnings per share is calculated or presented. This ASU is required to be applied retrospectively and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011. As this accounting standard only requires enhanced disclosure, the adoption of this standard will not impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

XML

Stock-Based Compensation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation

5. Stock-Based Compensation

The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense on all employee and non-employee awards as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2010		2011		2010		2011
Selling, general and administrative	$	912	$	161	$	3,530	$	547
Research and development	243		40		1,174		233
Total	$	1,155	$	201	$	4,704	$	780

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company granted 10,750 stock options at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, 2,000 stock options at an exercise price of $0.7625 per share and 1,749,591 shares of restricted stock. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company did not grant any stock options or shares of restricted stock. No stock-based compensation has been capitalized.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the fair value of stock options was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following assumptions:

	Nine months ended September 30, 2010
Expected volatility	94.1	%
Expected life in years	6.0
Weighted average risk-free interest rate	1.3	%
Expected dividends	0.0	%

XML

Fair Value Measurement

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Fair Value Measurement

Fair Value Measurement

6. Fair Value Measurement

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of generally three months or less at the time of acquisition to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair market value. The Company classifies marketable securities as available-for-sale. These securities are carried at fair market value with unrealized gains and, to the extent deemed temporary, unrealized losses, are reported as a component of other comprehensive gain or loss in stockholders’ deficit. Realized gains or losses on securities sold are based on the specific identification method.

Marketable securities are considered to be impaired when a decline in fair value below cost basis is determined to be other-than-temporary. The Company evaluates whether a decline in fair value below cost basis is other-than-temporary using available evidence regarding its investments. In the event that the cost basis of a security significantly exceeds its fair value, the Company evaluates, among other factors, the duration of the period that, and extent to which, the fair value is less than cost basis, the financial health of and business outlook for the issuer, including industry and sector performance, and operational and financing cash flow factors, overall market conditions and trends, the Company’s intent to sell the investment and if it is more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell the investment before its anticipated recovery. Once a decline in fair value is determined to be other-than-temporary, a write-down is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and a new cost basis in the security is established.

Regardless of the Company’s intent to sell a security, the Company performs additional analysis on all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate losses associated with the creditworthiness of the security. Credit losses are identified where the Company does not expect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the amortized cost basis of a security.

The Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011 are measured in accordance with FASB standards. Fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize observable data such as quoted prices in active markets. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs utilize unobservable data points in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The following table represents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2010:

($ in thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Money market funds	$	—	$	53	$	—	$	53
Warrant liability	—		—		220		220

The Company’s money market funds were valued at December 31, 2010 using calculated net asset values and are therefore classified as Level 2. The Company’s warrant liability was valued at December 31, 2010 using a Black- Scholes model and is therefore classified as Level 3.

The following table represents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2011:

($ in thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Money market funds	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Warrant liability	—		—		70		70

The Company’s warrant liability was valued at September 30, 2011 using a Black- Scholes model and is therefore classified as Level 3.

The following tables roll forward the fair value of our warrant liability, whose fair value is determined by Level 3 inputs for the 2011 period presented:

Balance at December 31, 2010	$	220
Exercise warrants	(192		)
Change in fair value	56
Balance at March 31, 2011	$	84
Exercise warrants	—
Change in fair value	(41		)
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	43
Exercise warrants	—
Change in fair value	27
Balance at September 30, 2011	$	70

The Company’s warrant liability relates to warrants issued in connection with two offerings of common stock in 2009. An aggregate of 6,482,505 warrants were issued pursuant to these two offerings, of which 1,945,099 were outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and 681,884 were outstanding as of September 30, 2011. The fair value of the warrants is estimated using a Black-Scholes model. Due to a price adjustment clause included in the warrant agreements, the warrants were deemed to be a liability and, therefore, the fair value of the warrants is recorded in the liability section of the balance sheet. As such, the outstanding warrants are revalued each reporting period with the resulting gains and losses recorded as the change in fair value of warrant liability on the statement of operations.

The carrying amount of the Company’s debt approximates its fair value at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011.

XML

Debt

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Debt

Debt

7. Debt

In November 2010, the Company entered into an insider bridge loan facility with two of the four venture capital firms whose representatives are members of the Board. In connection with this transaction, the Company entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “Subordinated Secured Note Purchase Agreement”) with investment funds affiliated with Atlas Venture and Flagship Ventures (the “Purchasers”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to the Purchasers, and the Purchasers have agreed to purchase, up to an aggregate of $4,000,000 of convertible promissory notes (the “Notes”), a portion of which is committed and a portion of which is optional (the “Bridge Debt Financing”). As of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, the Purchasers have purchased Notes having an aggregate principal amount of $666,667. Subject to the Company’s continued compliance with the terms of the Subordinated Secured Note Purchase Agreement, including that there not be an event of default thereunder, upon notice from the Company the Purchasers are committed to purchase an aggregate of an additional $333,333 of Notes in each of four subsequent closings, for a total aggregate committed amount of $2,000,000. The Purchasers also have the right, but not the obligation, upon the Company’s request to purchase up to an additional $2,000,000 of Notes on or before December 31, 2012. As of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, the Company’s outstanding indebtedness under the Notes was $674,000 and $725,000, respectively, including accrued interest.

As an inducement for the Purchasers to purchase the Notes, the Company entered into a Risk Premium Payment Agreement in November 2010 with the Purchasers (the “Risk Premium Agreement”) simultaneous with the execution of, and as required by, the Subordinated Secured Note Purchase Agreement. Under the terms of the Risk Premium Agreement, the Company agreed to pay the Purchasers the following portions of the consideration it receives (the “Payment Consideration”) in Liquidity Transactions, as defined below: (i) until the aggregate Payment Consideration equals $10 million, 60% of the Payment Consideration; (ii) for aggregate Payment Consideration from $10 million to $20 million, 50% of the Payment Consideration; (iii) for aggregate Payment Consideration from $20 million to $30 million, 40% of the Payment Consideration; (iv) for aggregate Payment Consideration from $30 million to $40 million, 30% of the Payment Consideration; and (v) for aggregate Payment Consideration in excess of $40 million, 10% of the Payment Consideration (any such payments, “Risk Premium Payments”). For purposes of determining amounts payable under the Risk Premium Agreement, the Payment Consideration will not include amounts the Company uses to first satisfy specified existing obligations, including obligations under the Loan Agreement, under professional contingency arrangements and obligations that may arise under existing technology license agreements (the “Existing IP Licensing Agreements”) between the Company and each of Arizona Technology Enterprises, Roche Diagnostics GMBH and Roche Diagnostics Corporation, and California Institute of Technology. For purposes of the Risk Premium Agreement and subject to various provisions therein, the following shall constitute Liquidity Transactions: (A) the receipt by the Company of any payments from third parties relating to its intellectual property portfolio of the Company, including payments received as a license or other settlement in patent infringement litigation brought by the Company (“IP Licensing Events”); (B) a merger of the Company in which there is a change of control; and (C) the sale or exclusive license by the Company of all or substantially all of its assets or intellectual property.

In connection with the Bridge Debt Financing in November 2010, the Company amended the existing Loan and Security Agreement (the “Senior Debt”) between the Company and certain lenders, including General Electric Capital Corporation (the “Lenders”), pursuant to the fourth amendment thereto (the “Fourth Amendment”). Pursuant to the Fourth Amendment, the Lenders waived various existing events of default and consented to the Company’s incurrence of additional indebtedness and the grant of a junior security interest to the Purchasers under the Subordinated Secured Note Purchase Agreement. The Company amended warrants previously issued to the Lenders to re-price the warrants from $4.80 to $0.01 and the Lenders agreed to defer a $200,000 payment originally due January 31, 2011 to the January 1, 2012 term loan maturity date. In addition, subject to the Company’s continued compliance with the terms of the Senior Debt, including that there not be an event of default thereunder, the Lenders agreed to defer up to five additional principal monthly payments with respect to the term loan. Also pursuant to the Fourth Amendment, the Company agreed to grant the Lenders a first priority security interest in all of its intellectual property and to pay the Lenders an additional $50,000 to $200,000 (depending upon how many principal payments are deferred) upon the full repayment of all outstanding amounts due with respect to the term loans. Under the terms of the Senior Debt prior to its amendment by the Fourth Amendment, the scope of the Lenders’ first priority security interest included all of its assets other than intellectual property. As of the date of this filing, the additional five monthly principal payments referenced above have been deferred and monthly principal payments of approximately $0.25 million resumed as of May 1, 2011. As of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, the outstanding balance of the Senior Debt was $2.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively.

As of September 30, 2011, loan payments are due as follows (in thousands):

	Senior Debt			Notes			Total
Twelve months ending September 30, 2012	$	1,851		$	—		$	1,851
Twelve months ending September 30, 2013	—			743			743
Thereafter	—			—			—
Total future minimum payments	1,851			743			2,594
Less: amount representing interest	(24		)	(77		)	(101		)
Less: debt discount	(800		)	—			(800		)
Add: interest accrued	—			59			59
Add: amortization of debt discount	740			—			740
Carrying value of debt	1,767			725			2,492
Less: current portion	(1,767		)	—			(1,767		)
Long-term obligations	$	—		$	725		$	725

The above table does not reflect any Risk Premium Payments potentially due to the Note holders pursuant to the Risk Premium Agreement. Such payments are not probable or estimable at September 30, 2011 without specific eligible transactions to assess the financial consideration and amount of the resulting Risk Premium Payment.

XML

Nature of the Business and Basis of Presentation

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Nature of the Business and Basis of Presentation

Nature of the Business and Basis of Presentation

1. Nature of the Business and Basis of Presentation

Helicos BioSciences Corporation (“Helicos” or the “Company”) is a life sciences company focused on innovative genetic analysis technologies. Helicos has developed a proprietary technology to enable the rapid analysis of large volumes of genetic material by directly sequencing single molecules of DNA or RNA. The Company’s tSMS approach differs from current methods of sequencing DNA or RNA because it analyzes individual molecules of DNA directly instead of analyzing a large number of copies of the molecule which must be produced through complex sample preparation techniques. The Company’s tSMS technology eliminates the need for costly, labor-intensive and time-consuming sample preparation techniques, such as amplification or cloning, which are required by other methods to produce a sufficient quantity of genetic material for analysis.

The Company’s Helicos® Genetic Analysis Platform is designed to obtain sequencing information by repetitively performing a cycle of biochemical reactions on individual DNA or RNA molecules and imaging the results after each cycle. The platform consists of an instrument called the HeliScope™ Single Molecule Sequencer, an image analysis computer tower called the HeliScope™ Analysis Engine, associated reagents, which are chemicals used in the sequencing process, and disposable supplies. The information generated from using our tSMS products may lead to improved drug therapies, personalized medical treatments and more accurate diagnostics for cancer and other diseases.

The Company has had limited operations to date and its activities have consisted primarily of raising capital, conducting research and development and recruiting personnel. Accordingly, the Company is considered to be in the development stage at September 30, 2011, as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). The Company’s fiscal year ends on December 31. The Company operates as one reportable segment. Helicos is a Delaware corporation and was incorporated on May 9, 2003.

The Company plans to deploy its limited resources by focusing on intellectual property monetization and selected research and development activities that are primarily related to grant-funded initiatives. In addition, the Company has  scaled-down other research and development efforts in targeted areas that were designed to achieve tangible proof-of-concept goals connected with potential partnership opportunities with companies interested in next-generation sequencing, or to pursue other funding and strategic alternatives. As of the date of this filing, the Company does not have adequate resources and will continue to need to generate additional funding from various sources including contract sequencing service projects and government grants. The Company plans to defend its intellectual property rights through licensing and enforcement strategies. In this regard, the Company took several actions. The Company filed a lawsuit against Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc., Illumina, Inc. and Life Technologies Corporation (collectively, the “Defendants”) for patent infringement. The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, accuses the Defendants of infringing several patents and seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages. The Company is seeking a permanent injunction enjoining the Defendants from further infringement as well as monetary and punitive damages, costs and attorneys’ fees, interest and other relief as determined by the Court.

In connection with the Bridge Debt Financing and the Senior Debt and as security for the Company’s obligations under our contingency fee arrangement with outside intellectual property litigation counsel relating to the patent infringement lawsuit the Company filed against Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc., Illumina, Inc. and Life Technologies Corporation, the Company entered into a subordinated security agreement with outside intellectual property litigation counsel. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company agreed to grant outside intellectual property litigation counsel a second priority security interest in the patent infringement lawsuit. Under the terms of the contingency fee arrangement, the Company is obligated to pay outside intellectual property litigation counsel up to 40% of the proceeds paid to the Company in connection with the settlement, judgment or other resolution of the Cause of Action (as defined in the contingency fee arrangement) or certain business transactions resulting from or relating to the patent infringement lawsuit. To date, the Company and those providing professional services in connection with this patent litigation on a contingent basis have expended significant resources in pursuit of this intellectual property monetization effort and are expected to continue to do so going forward. The Company believes that the net proceeds generated by this litigation, if the Company is successful, could be substantial. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in this litigation, even in the event of a favorable outcome in this litigation there can be no assurance that there will be any proceeds remaining for common shareholders, as a result of various arrangements in place with professional service providers, bridge lenders, licensors and others. The Company also continues to pursue its technology licensing program for its Single Molecule Sequencing and Sequencing-by-Synthesis intellectual property.

In March 2005, the Company entered into an agreement (as amended, the “License Agreement”) with Arizona Technology Enterprises (“AZTE”) in which AZTE granted the Company a worldwide, exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-bearing license, with the right to grant sublicenses, under a family of specified patents and patent applications (the “Licensed Patents”) exclusively licensed by AZTE from the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of Arizona State University within a specified field of use.  On August 26, 2011, the Company and AZTE entered into a First Amendment to the License Agreement (the “Amendment”).  The Amendment expanded the field under the License Agreement so that AZTE has now granted the Company the exclusive right and license under the Licensed Patents to the full extent of the entire scope of all claims within the Licensed Patents, in all fields of use.  AZTE’s license to the Company under the License Agreement (the “AZTE Licensed Rights”), which gives the Company rights to several issued patents covering sequencing-by-synthesis methods and a number of pending patent applications, now expressly includes detection methods that do not rely on the detection of optically-labeled nucleotides (the “Expanded Field”).  Under the terms of the Amendment, the Company will remain obligated to pay AZTE a specified percentage of income from Company-granted sublicenses or other transfers of the AZTE Licensed Rights, including as part of any sale of the Company or litigation settlement.  Amounts the Company owes to AZTE will be a percentage of the proportionate value of the AZTE Licensed Rights in any such transaction.  The Company has also agreed to make additional payments to AZTE for Company-granted sublicenses or other such transfers of the AZTE Licensed Rights within the Expanded Field.  The Company will retain its existing first right to initiate and pursue patent infringement suits involving the AZTE Licensed Rights.

Although the Company believes that the HeliScope Sequencer has unique utility across a broad array of molecular diagnostic (“MDx”) tests, due to significant financial and resource constraints and a lack of any significant improvement to the financial outlook of the Company, the Company has further delayed its efforts to bring high-value MDx tests based on its technology to the market through a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (“CLIA”) laboratory partnership. Nevertheless, the Company still believes that diagnostic applications may benefit from the specific features of the Helicos System, including the platform’s ability to sequence non-amplified natural DNA and RNA directly, quantitative accuracy, high throughput, ability to use small sample quantities in simple and cost effective preparation methods, as well as a lack of biases typically seen with sample amplification. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to deploy MDx tests or its technology through a CLIA laboratory, out-licensing or through its own efforts.

In order to further conserve its limited resources, during the second quarter of 2011, the Company further reduced its workforce by phasing out six business and research positions. These six positions were phased out during the third quarter of 2011 and ultimately reduced the Company’s total headcount to ten positions. In addition, during the third quarter of 2011, the Company entered into a new lease reducing the size and associated expense of its leased facility in Cambridge, Massachusetts which will house the Company’s headquarters and scientific laboratory. The Company did not incur or pay out severance charges or lease exit costs in connection with the implementation of these measures. Notwithstanding these most recent workforce reductions and despite the Company’s previous reductions, restructurings, expense saving measures, and the Senior Debt and the Bridge Debt Financing (see Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements), the Company does not have sufficient funds to pursue its business priorities. The Company will require significant additional capital by December 2011 to continue its operations beyond the existing $2,000,000 committed portion of the Bridge Debt. As of the date of this filing, $666,667 has been drawn against this committed facility and $1,333,333 remains available to support ongoing operations. Potential sources of additional funding may include funding from the $2,000,000 uncommitted portion of the Bridge Debt Financing facility and/or from other sources that have not yet been identified, but there can be no assurance that any such funding will be available on reasonable terms, if at all. As a result, the Company is no longer able to remain current in making payments to trade vendors and other unsecured creditors when such payments are due and, despite the restructuring of its Senior Debt, this inability to remain current increases the likelihood that the Lenders could declare a default under the Senior Debt in the near-term, including with regard to solvency. For the period from November 2010 through April 2011, the Company made interest only payments on amounts outstanding on the Senior Debt. Beginning in May 2011, the Company resumed making monthly principal payments of approximately $0.25 million on its Senior Debt. Workforce reductions, as well as curtailed financial resources, will further impact the Company’s ability to implement its business priorities. In addition, these constraints have caused the Company to significantly scale back service support and reagent supply to its current installed base. The Company has also significantly curtailed collaborative activities with other parties. The Company believes that these actions will provide additional time to execute its business priorities.

In November 2010, the Company’s securities were delisted from the NASDAQ Global Market and the trading of its common stock was suspended before the opening of business on November 16, 2010, and a Form 25-NSE was subsequently filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 21, 2011 which removed the Company’s securities from listing and registration on The NASDAQ Stock Market. The Company’s securities are currently traded under the symbol “HLCS” on the OTCQB which is a market tier for OTC-traded companies that are registered and reporting with the SEC.

The Company’s future capital requirements will depend on many factors and it may require additional capital beyond its currently anticipated amounts. Any such required additional capital may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all, given the Company’s prospects, the current economic environment and restricted access to capital markets. The continued depletion of its resources may make future funding more difficult or expensive to obtain. Additional equity financing may be dilutive to the Company’s stockholders; debt financing, if available, may involve significant cash payment obligations and covenants that restrict its ability to operate as a business; and strategic partnerships may result in royalties or other terms which reduce its economic potential from any adjustments to its existing long-term strategy. If the Company is unable to execute its operations according to its plans or to obtain additional financing, the Company may be forced to cease operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets or the amount of reclassification of liabilities, or any adjustment that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Since inception, the Company has incurred losses and has not generated positive cash flows from operations. The Company expects its losses to continue for a considerable period of time. These losses, among other things, have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on its working capital, total assets and stockholders’ equity/(deficit). As of September 30, 2011 and November 1, 2011, the Company had $550,000 and $275,000, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents. The Company will require significant additional capital in December 2011 to continue its operations beyond the existing $2,000,000 committed portion of the Bridge Debt. As of the date of this filing, $666,667 has been drawn against this committed facility and $1,333,333 remains available to support ongoing operations. Potential sources of additional funding may include funding from the $2,000,000 uncommitted portion of the Bridge Debt Financing facility and/or from other sources that have not yet been identified, but there can be no assurance that any such funding will be available on reasonable terms, if at all. Including $1,333,333 of the available Bridge Debt facility, the Company has $1,608,333 in total available resources as of November 1, 2011 and owes approximately $250,000 in monthly principal payments for each of December 2011 and January 2012 as well as a final $800,000 payment on the Senior Debt due in January 2012. If the Company is unable to execute its operations according to its plans or to obtain additional financing, the Company may be forced to cease operations. The Company’s present capital resources are not sufficient to fund its planned operations for a twelve month period as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011.Accordingly, the Company’s current financial resources raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States of America requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the financial statements. Actual amounts may differ from these estimates because of different assumptions or conditions. The year-end consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by GAAP. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

It is management’s opinion that the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (which are normal and recurring) that are necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods. The interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

XML

Inventory

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Inventory

Inventory

3. Inventory

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined under the first-in, first-out, or FIFO, method. The Company’s inventory at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011 was $2,935,000 and consisted of finished goods. These finished goods relate to sales for which the revenue has been deferred and will be recognized as cost of sales when revenue for such sales is recognized.

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Preferred stock, shares authorized	5,000,000	5,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock, shares authorized	120,000,000	120,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	87,233,989	86,557,606
Common stock, shares outstanding	87,233,989	86,557,606