XML 87 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Outstanding Exposure
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Outstanding Exposure Disclosure  
Outstanding Exposure
Outstanding Exposure
 
The Company’s financial guaranty contracts are written in either insurance or credit derivative form, but collectively are considered financial guaranty contracts. The Company seeks to limit its exposure to losses by underwriting obligations that are investment grade at inception, diversifying its insured portfolio and maintaining rigorous subordination or collateralization requirements on structured finance obligations. The Company also has utilized reinsurance by ceding business to third-party reinsurers. The Company provides financial guaranties with respect to debt obligations of special purpose entities, including variable interest entities ("VIEs"). Some of these VIEs are consolidated as described in Note 9, Consolidated Variable Interest Entities. The outstanding par and Debt Service amounts presented below include outstanding exposures on VIEs whether or not they are consolidated.

     The Company has issued financial guaranty insurance policies on public finance obligations and structured finance obligations. Public finance obligations insured by the Company consist primarily of general obligation bonds supported by the taxing powers of U.S. state or municipal governmental authorities, as well as tax-supported bonds, revenue bonds and other obligations supported by covenants from state or municipal governmental authorities or other municipal obligors to impose and collect fees and charges for public services or specific infrastructure projects. The Company also includes within public finance obligations those obligations backed by the cash flow from leases or other revenues from projects serving substantial public purposes, including utilities, toll roads, health care facilities and government office buildings. Structured finance obligations insured by the Company are generally issued by special purpose entities and backed by pools of assets having an ascertainable cash flow or market value or other specialized financial obligations.
 
Surveillance Categories
 
The Company segregates its insured portfolio into investment grade and below-investment-grade ("BIG") surveillance categories to facilitate the appropriate allocation of resources to monitoring and loss mitigation efforts and to aid in establishing the appropriate cycle for periodic review for each exposure. BIG exposures include all exposures with internal credit ratings below BBB-. The Company’s internal credit ratings are based on internal assessments of the likelihood of default and loss severity in the event of default. Internal credit ratings are expressed on a ratings scale similar to that used by the rating agencies and are generally reflective of an approach similar to that employed by the rating agencies, except that the Company's internal credit ratings focus on future performance rather than lifetime performance.
 
The Company monitors its investment grade credits to determine whether any new credits need to be internally downgraded to BIG. The Company refreshes its internal credit ratings on individual credits in quarterly, semi-annual or annual cycles based on the Company’s view of the credit’s quality, loss potential, volatility and sector. Ratings on credits in sectors identified as under the most stress or with the most potential volatility are reviewed every quarter. The Company’s credit ratings on assumed credits are based on the Company’s reviews of low-rated credits or credits in volatile sectors, unless such information is not available, in which case, the ceding company’s credit rating of the transactions are used. The Company models the performance of many of its structured finance transactions as part of its periodic internal credit rating review of them. The Company models most assumed residential mortgage-backed security ("RMBS") credits with par above $1 million, as well as certain RMBS credits below that amount.
 
Credits identified as BIG are subjected to further review to determine the probability of a loss. See Note 5, Expected Loss to be Paid, for additional information. Surveillance personnel then assign each BIG transaction to the appropriate BIG surveillance category based upon whether a future loss is expected and whether a claim has been paid. For surveillance purposes, the Company calculates present value using a constant discount rate of 5%. (A risk-free rate is used for calculating the expected loss for financial statement purposes.)
 
More extensive monitoring and intervention is employed for all BIG surveillance categories, with internal credit ratings reviewed quarterly. The Company expects “future losses” on a transaction when the Company believes there is at least a 50% chance that, on a present value basis, it will pay more claims over the future of that transaction than it will have reimbursed. The three BIG categories are:
 
BIG Category 1: Below-investment-grade transactions showing sufficient deterioration to make future losses possible, but for which none are currently expected.
 
BIG Category 2: Below-investment-grade transactions for which future losses are expected but for which no claims (other than liquidity claims which is a claim that the Company expects to be reimbursed within one year) have yet been paid.
 
BIG Category 3: Below-investment-grade transactions for which future losses are expected and on which claims (other than liquidity claims) have been paid.

Components of Outstanding Exposure

Unless otherwise noted, ratings disclosed herein on the Company's insured portfolio reflect its internal ratings. The Company classifies those portions of risks benefiting from reimbursement obligations collateralized by eligible assets held in trust in acceptable reimbursement structures as the higher of 'AA' or their current internal rating.

Debt Service Outstanding

 
Gross Debt Service
Outstanding
 
Net Debt Service
Outstanding
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
 
March 31,
2014
 
December 31,
2013
 
(in millions)
Public finance
$
639,981

 
$
650,924

 
$
601,433

 
$
610,011

Structured finance
81,195

 
86,456

 
75,535

 
80,524

Total financial guaranty
$
721,176

 
$
737,380

 
$
676,968

 
$
690,535


 
In addition to the amounts shown in the table above, the Company’s net mortgage guaranty insurance debt service was approximately $153 million as of March 31, 2014. The net mortgage guaranty insurance in force constitutes assumed excess of loss business written between 2004 and 2006 and comprises $145 million covering loans originated in Ireland and $8 million covering loans originated in the U.K.

Financial Guaranty Portfolio by Internal Rating
As of March 31, 2014 

 
 
Public Finance
U.S.
 
Public Finance
Non-U.S.
 
Structured Finance
U.S
 
Structured Finance
Non-U.S
 
Total
Rating
Category
 
Net Par
Outstanding
 
%
 
Net Par
Outstanding
 
%
 
Net Par
Outstanding
 
%
 
Net Par
Outstanding
 
%
 
Net Par
Outstanding
 
%
 
 
(dollars in millions)
AAA
 
$
4,658

 
1.3
%
 
$
1,020

 
2.9
%
 
$
29,868

 
53.9
%
 
$
8,856

 
68.2
%
 
$
44,402

 
9.9
%
AA
 
104,577

 
30.2

 
427

 
1.2

 
9,396

 
17.0

 
570

 
4.4

 
114,970

 
25.6

A
 
187,433

 
54.1

 
9,595

 
27.6

 
2,340

 
4.2

 
661

 
5.1

 
200,029

 
44.4

BBB
 
40,783

 
11.8

 
22,173

 
63.7

 
3,496

 
6.3

 
1,829

 
14.1

 
68,281

 
15.2

BIG
 
8,977

 
2.6

 
1,611

 
4.6

 
10,293

 
18.6

 
1,062

 
8.2

 
21,943

 
4.9

Total net par outstanding (excluding loss mitigation bonds)
 
$
346,428

 
100.0
%
 
$
34,826

 
100.0
%
 
$
55,393

 
100.0
%
 
$
12,978

 
100.0
%
 
$
449,625

 
100.0
%
Loss Mitigation Bonds
 
32

 
 
 

 
 
 
1,204

 
 
 

 
 
 
1,236

 
 
Net Par Outstanding (including loss mitigation bonds)
 
$
346,460

 
 
 
$
34,826

 
 
 
$
56,597

 
 
 
$
12,978

 
 
 
$
450,861

 
 
 
Financial Guaranty Portfolio by Internal Rating
As of December 31, 2013 

 
 
Public Finance
U.S.
 
Public Finance
Non-U.S.
 
Structured Finance
U.S
 
Structured Finance
Non-U.S
 
Total
Rating
Category
 
Net Par
Outstanding
 
%
 
Net Par
Outstanding
 
%
 
Net Par
Outstanding
 
%
 
Net Par
Outstanding
 
%
 
Net Par
Outstanding
 
%
 
 
(dollars in millions)
AAA
 
$
4,998

 
1.4
%
 
$
1,016

 
3.0
%
 
$
32,317

 
54.9
%
 
$
9,684

 
69.1
%
 
$
48,015

 
10.5
%
AA
 
107,503

 
30.5

 
422

 
1.2

 
9,431

 
16.0

 
577

 
4.1

 
117,933

 
25.7

A
 
192,841

 
54.8

 
9,453

 
27.9

 
2,580

 
4.4

 
742

 
5.3

 
205,616

 
44.8

BBB
 
37,745

 
10.7

 
21,499

 
63.2

 
3,815

 
6.4

 
1,946

 
13.9

 
65,005

 
14.1

BIG
 
9,094

 
2.6

 
1,608

 
4.7

 
10,764

 
18.3

 
1,072

 
7.6

 
22,538

 
4.9

Total net par outstanding (excluding loss mitigation bonds)
 
$
352,181

 
100.0
%
 
$
33,998

 
100.0
%
 
$
58,907

 
100.0
%
 
$
14,021

 
100.0
%
 
$
459,107

 
100.0
%
Loss Mitigation Bonds
 
32

 
 
 

 
 
 
1,163

 
 
 

 
 
 
1,195

 
 
Net Par Outstanding (including loss mitigation bonds)
 
$
352,213

 
 
 
$
33,998

 
 
 
$
60,070

 
 
 
$
14,021

 
 
 
$
460,302

 
 
 
In accordance with the terms of certain credit derivative contracts, the referenced obligations in such contracts have been delivered to the Company and therefore are included in the investment portfolio. Such amounts are still included in the financial guaranty insured portfolio, and totaled $165 million and $195 million in gross par outstanding as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

In addition to amounts shown in the tables above, the Company had outstanding commitments to provide guaranties of $577 million for structured finance and $330 million for public finance obligations at March 31, 2014. The structured finance commitments include the unfunded component of pooled corporate and other transactions. Public finance commitments typically relate to primary and secondary public finance debt issuances. The expiration dates for the public finance commitments range between April 15, 2014 and February 25, 2017, with $206 million expiring prior to December 31, 2014. The commitments are contingent on the satisfaction of all conditions set forth in them and may expire unused or be canceled at the counterparty’s request. Therefore, the total commitment amount does not necessarily reflect actual future guaranteed amounts.

Components of BIG Portfolio
Components of BIG Net Par Outstanding
(Insurance and Credit Derivative Form)
As of March 31, 2014

 
BIG Net Par Outstanding
 
Net Par
 
BIG Net Par as
a % of Total Net Par
 
BIG 1
 
BIG 2
 
BIG 3
 
Total BIG
 
Outstanding
 
Outstanding
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
First lien U.S. RMBS:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Prime first lien
$
77

 
$
289

 
$
29

 
$
395

 
$
528

 
0.1
%
Alt-A first lien
703

 
787

 
1,223

 
2,713

 
3,478

 
0.6

Option ARM
66

 
59

 
440

 
565

 
877

 
0.1

Subprime
227

 
860

 
769

 
1,856

 
5,921

 
0.4

Second lien U.S. RMBS:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Closed-end second lien
8

 
19

 
116

 
143

 
239

 
0.0

Home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”)
1,480

 
19

 
235

 
1,734

 
1,982

 
0.4

Total U.S. RMBS
2,561

 
2,033

 
2,812

 
7,406

 
13,025

 
1.6

Trust preferred securities (“TruPS”)
1,235

 
343

 

 
1,578

 
4,826

 
0.4

Other structured finance
1,348

 
304

 
719

 
2,371

 
50,520

 
0.5

U.S. public finance
8,117

 
419

 
441

 
8,977

 
346,428

 
2.0

Non-U.S. public finance
989

 
622

 

 
1,611

 
34,826

 
0.4

Total
$
14,250

 
$
3,721

 
$
3,972

 
$
21,943

 
$
449,625

 
4.9
%

Components of BIG Net Par Outstanding
(Insurance and Credit Derivative Form)
As of December 31, 2013

 
BIG Net Par Outstanding
 
Net Par
 
BIG Net Par as
a % of Total Net Par
 
BIG 1
 
BIG 2
 
BIG 3
 
Total BIG
 
Outstanding
 
Outstanding
 
 
 
 
 
(in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
First lien U.S. RMBS:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Prime first lien
$
52

 
$
321

 
$
30

 
$
403

 
$
541

 
0.1
%
Alt-A first lien
656

 
1,137

 
935

 
2,728

 
3,590

 
0.6

Option ARM
71

 
60

 
467

 
598

 
937

 
0.1

Subprime
297

 
908

 
740

 
1,945

 
6,130

 
0.4

Second lien U.S. RMBS:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Closed-end second lien
8

 
20

 
118

 
146

 
244

 
0.0

HELOCs
1,499

 
20

 
378

 
1,897

 
2,279

 
0.4

Total U.S. RMBS
2,583

 
2,466

 
2,668

 
7,717

 
13,721

 
1.6

TruPS
1,587

 
135

 

 
1,722

 
4,970

 
0.4

Other structured finance
1,367

 
309

 
721

 
2,397

 
54,237

 
0.5

U.S. public finance
8,205

 
440

 
449

 
9,094

 
352,181

 
2.0

Non-U.S. public finance
1,009

 
599

 

 
1,608

 
33,998

 
0.4

Total
$
14,751

 
$
3,949

 
$
3,838

 
$
22,538

 
$
459,107

 
4.9
%

BIG Net Par Outstanding
and Number of Risks
As of March 31, 2014

 
 
Net Par Outstanding
 
Number of Risks(2)
Description
 
Financial
Guaranty
Insurance(1)
 
Credit
Derivative
 
Total
 
Financial
Guaranty
Insurance(1)
 
Credit
Derivative
 
Total
 
 
(dollars in millions)
BIG:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Category 1
 
$
12,242

 
$
2,008

 
$
14,250

 
193

 
24

 
217

Category 2
 
2,253

 
1,468

 
3,721

 
80

 
21

 
101

Category 3
 
2,872

 
1,100

 
3,972

 
109

 
27

 
136

Total BIG
 
$
17,367

 
$
4,576

 
$
21,943

 
382

 
72

 
454


 BIG Net Par Outstanding
and Number of Risks
As of December 31, 2013

 
 
Net Par Outstanding
 
Number of Risks(2)
Description
 
Financial
Guaranty
Insurance(1)
 
Credit
Derivative
 
Total
 
Financial
Guaranty
Insurance(1)
 
Credit
Derivative
 
Total
 
 
(dollars in millions)
BIG:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Category 1
 
$
12,391

 
$
2,360

 
$
14,751

 
185

 
25

 
210

Category 2
 
2,323

 
1,626

 
3,949

 
80

 
21

 
101

Category 3
 
3,031

 
807

 
3,838

 
119

 
27

 
146

Total BIG
 
$
17,745

 
$
4,793

 
$
22,538

 
384

 
73

 
457

_____________________
(1)    Includes net par outstanding for FG VIEs.
 
(2)
A risk represents the aggregate of the financial guaranty policies that share the same revenue source for purposes of making Debt Service payments.
 
Direct Economic Exposure to the Selected European Countries

Several European countries continue to experience significant economic, fiscal and/or political strains such that the likelihood of default on obligations with a nexus to those countries may be higher than the Company anticipated when such factors did not exist. The European countries where the Company believes heightened uncertainties exist are: Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain (collectively, the “Selected European Countries”). The Company is closely monitoring its exposures in the Selected European Countries where it believes heightened uncertainties exist. The Company’s economic exposure to the Selected European Countries (based on par for financial guaranty contracts and notional amount for financial guaranty contracts accounted for as derivatives) is shown in the following table, net of ceded reinsurance.
 
Net Direct Economic Exposure to Selected European Countries(1)
As of March 31, 2014

 
Hungary (2)
 
Ireland
 
Italy
 
Portugal (2)
 
Spain (2)
 
Total
 
 
Sovereign and sub-sovereign exposure:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Non-infrastructure public finance (3)
$

 
$

 
$
1,026

 
$
98

 
$
274

 
$
1,398

Infrastructure finance
370

 

 
18

 
12

 
156

 
556

Sub-total
370

 

 
1,044

 
110

 
430

 
1,954

Non-sovereign exposure:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Regulated utilities

 

 
235

 

 

 
235

RMBS
217

 
145

 
312

 

 

 
674

Sub-total
217

 
145

 
547

 

 

 
909

Total
$
587

 
$
145

 
$
1,591

 
$
110

 
$
430

 
$
2,863

Total BIG
$
587

 
$

 
$

 
$
110

 
$
429

 
$
1,126

____________________
(1)
While the Company’s exposures are shown in U.S. dollars, the obligations the Company insures are in various currencies, including U.S. dollars and Euros. Included in the table above is $145 million of reinsurance assumed on a 2004 - 2006 pool of Irish residential mortgages that is part of the Company’s remaining legacy mortgage reinsurance business. One of the residential mortgage-backed securities included in the table above includes residential mortgages in both Italy and Germany, and only the portion of the transaction equal to the portion of the original mortgage pool in Italian mortgages is shown in the table.

(2)
See Note 5, Expected Loss to be Paid.

(3)
The exposure shown in the “Non-infrastructure public finance” category is from transactions backed by receivable payments from sub-sovereigns in Italy, Spain and Portugal. Sub-sovereign debt is debt issued by a governmental entity or government backed entity, or supported by such an entity, that is other than direct sovereign debt of the ultimate governing body of the country.
 
When the Company directly insures an obligation, it assigns the obligation to a geographic location or locations based on its view of the geographic location of the risk. For direct exposure this can be a relatively straight-forward determination as, for example, a debt issue supported by availability payments for a toll road in a particular country. The Company may also assign portions of a risk to more than one geographic location. The Company may also have direct exposures to the Selected European Countries in business assumed from unaffiliated monoline insurance companies. In the case of assumed business for direct exposures, the Company depends upon geographic information provided by the primary insurer.

The Company has excluded from the exposure tables above its indirect economic exposure to the Selected European Countries through policies it provides on (a) pooled corporate and (b) commercial receivables transactions. The Company considers economic exposure to a selected European Country to be indirect when the exposure relates to only a small portion of an insured transaction that otherwise is not related to a Selected European Country. The Company has reviewed transactions through which it believes it may have indirect exposure to the Selected European Countries that is material to the transaction and calculated total net indirect exposure to Selected European Counties in non-sovereign pooled corporate and non-sovereign commercial receivables to be $710 million and $89 million, respectively, based on the proportion of the insured par equal to the proportion of obligors identified as being domiciled in a Selected European Country.

Exposure to Puerto Rico
         
The Company insures general obligation bonds of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and various obligations of its related authorities and public corporations aggregating $5.3 billion net par. The Company rates $5.1 billion net par of that amount BIG. The following table shows estimated amortization of the general obligation bonds of Puerto Rico and various obligations of its related authorities and public corporations insured and rated BIG by the Company. The Company guarantees payments of interest and principal when those amounts are scheduled to be paid and cannot be required to pay on an accelerated basis. The column labeled “Estimated BIG Net Debt Service Amortization” shows the total amount of principal and interest due in the period indicated and represents the maximum net amount the Company would be required to pay on BIG Puerto Rico exposures in a given period, assuming the obligors paid nothing on all of those obligations in that period.
       
Amortization Schedule of BIG Net Par Outstanding
and BIG Net Debt Service Outstanding of Puerto Rico
As of March 31, 2014

 
 
Estimated BIG Net Par Amortization
 
Estimated BIG Net Debt Service Amortization
 
 
(in millions)
2014 (April 1 - June 30)
 
$

 
$
64

2014 (July 1 - September 30)
 
254

 
315

2014 (October 1 - December 31)
 

 
61

2015
 
364

 
601

2016
 
289

 
509

2017
 
208

 
415

2018
 
159

 
358

2019-2023
 
884

 
1,718

2024-2028
 
937

 
1,566

2029-2033
 
697

 
1,125

After 2033
 
1,281

 
1,574

Total
 
$
5,073

 
$
8,306



Recent announcements and actions by the Governor and his administration indicate officials of the Commonwealth are focused on measures to help Puerto Rico operate within its financial resources and maintain its access to the capital markets. All Puerto Rico credits insured by the Company are current on their debt service payments. Neither Puerto Rico nor its related authorities and public corporations are eligible debtors under Chapter 9 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. However, Puerto Rico faces high debt levels, a declining population and an economy that has been in recession since 2006. Puerto Rico has been operating with a structural budget deficit in recent years, and its two largest pension funds are significantly underfunded.