10-Q 1 v464152_10q.htm FORM 10-Q

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

  

FORM 10-Q

 

  

(Mark One)

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017

 

OR

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from              to           

 

Commission file number: 001-35668

 

 

INTERCEPT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

 

Delaware   22-3868459

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number) 

     

10 Hudson Yards, 37th FL

New York, NY  

  10001
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)

 

(646) 747-1000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  x  No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  x  No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer      x Accelerated filer ¨
   
Non-accelerated filer        ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨
   
Emerging growth company              ¨  

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

    

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

 

As of April 28, 2017, there were 25,009,178 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding.

 

 

 

 

Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

 

INDEX

  

 

PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION 

 
     
Item 1. Financial Statements 5
     
  Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2017 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2016 (Audited) 5
     
  Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited) 6
     
  Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited) 7
     
  Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (Unaudited) 8
     
  Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) 9
     
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 17
     
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk 23
     
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 23
     
   PART II
 OTHER INFORMATION
 
     
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 24
     
Item 1A. Risk Factors 24
     
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 24
     
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 24
     
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 24
     
Item 5. Other Information 24
     
Item 6. Exhibits 24
     
Signatures 25
   
Exhibit Index 26

  

Unless the context otherwise indicates, references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “we,” “our,” “us” and “the Company” refer, collectively, to Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries.

 

 2 

 

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including statements regarding our strategy, future operations, future financial position, future revenue, projected costs, prospects, plans, objectives of management and expected market growth, are forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

 

The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “target,” “potential,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “continue,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements about:

 

·our ability to successfully commercialize Ocaliva® (obeticholic acid, or OCA) in primary biliary cholangitis, or PBC, and our ability to maintain our regulatory approval of Ocaliva in PBC in the United States, Europe and other jurisdictions in which we may receive marketing authorization;
·the initiation, cost, timing, progress and results of our development activities, preclinical studies and clinical trials;
·the timing of and our ability to obtain regulatory approval of OCA in indications other than PBC and regulatory approval of any other product candidates we may develop such as INT-767;

·conditions that may be imposed by regulatory authorities on our marketing approvals for our products and product candidates, such as the need for clinical outcomes data (and not just results based on achievement of a surrogate endpoint), and any related restrictions, limitations and/or warnings in the label of any products or product candidates;

·our plans to research, develop and commercialize our products and product candidates;
·our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our products and product candidates;
·our ability to successfully commercialize our products and product candidates;
·the size and growth of the markets for our products and product candidates and our ability to serve those markets;
·the rate and degree of market acceptance of any products, which may be affected by the reimbursement received from payors;
·the success of competing drugs that are or become available;
·regulatory developments in the United States and other countries;
·the performance of our third-party suppliers and manufacturers;
·our collaborators’ election to pursue research, development and commercialization activities;
·our ability to attract collaborators with development, regulatory and commercialization expertise;
·our need for and ability to obtain additional financing;
·our estimates regarding expenses, revenues and capital requirements and the accuracy thereof;
·our use of cash and short-term investments; and
·our ability to attract and retain key scientific or management personnel.

 

These forward-looking statements are only predictions and we may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements, so you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements we make. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition and operating results. We have included important factors in the cautionary statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2017, particularly in Item 1.A. Risk Factors, and in our subsequent periodic and current reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Those risk factors, together with any updates to those risk factors contained in our subsequent periodic and current reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, could cause actual future results or events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements that we make. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or investments we may make.

 

You should read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the documents that we have filed as exhibits to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

 

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q presents projected adjusted operating expense, which is a financial measure not calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, and should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, operating expense that we prepare and announce in accordance with GAAP. We exclude certain items from adjusted operating expense, such as stock-based compensation and other non-cash items, that management does not believe affect our basic operations and that do not meet the GAAP definition of unusual or non-recurring items. For the year ended December 31, 2016, adjusted operating expense also excludes a one-time $45 million net expense for the settlement of a purported class action lawsuit. Other than the net class action lawsuit settlement amount, which is a one-time expense, we anticipate that stock-based compensation expense will represent the most significant non-cash item that is excluded in adjusted operating expenses as compared to operating expenses under GAAP. A reconciliation of projected non-GAAP adjusted operating expense to operating expense calculated in accordance with GAAP is not available on a forward-looking basis without unreasonable effort due to an inability to make accurate projections and estimates related to certain information needed to calculate, for example, future stock-based compensation expense. Management also uses adjusted operating expense to establish budgets and operational goals and to manage our company’s business. Other companies may define this measure in different ways. We believe this presentation provides investors and management with supplemental information relating to operating performance and trends that facilitate comparisons between periods and with respect to projected information.

 

 3 

 

 

NOTE REGARDING TRADEMARKS

 

The Intercept Pharmaceuticals® name and logo and the Ocaliva® name and logo are either registered or unregistered trademarks or trade names of Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries. All other trademarks, service marks or other tradenames appearing in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are the property of their respective owners. 

 

 4 

 

 

 PART I

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

INTERCEPT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

   March 31,   December 31, 
   2017   2016 
   (Unaudited)   (Audited) 
         
Assets          
Current assets:          
Cash and cash equivalents  $66,950   $43,675 
Investment securities, available-for-sale   541,063    645,710 
Accounts receivable   10,625    9,126 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets   16,348    9,354 
Total current assets   634,986    707,865 
Fixed assets, net   14,518    11,295 
Inventory   2,116    2,279 
Security deposits   16,400    17,814 
Total assets  $668,020   $739,253 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity          
Current liabilities:          
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities  $62,923   $65,551 
Short-term interest payable   3,738    7,267 
Short-term portion of deferred revenue   6,019    5,694 
Total current liabilities   72,680    78,512 
Long-term liabilities:          
Long-term debt   344,825    341,356 
Long-term other liabilities   6,268    - 
Long-term portion of deferred revenue   4,009    4,453 
Total liabilities   427,782    424,321 
Stockholders’ equity:          
Preferred stock par value $0.001 per share; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively   -    - 
Common stock par value $0.001 per share; 45,000,000 shares authorized; 25,012,174 and 24,819,918 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively   25    25 
Additional paid-in capital   1,441,501    1,426,168 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net   (2,182)   (2,801)
Accumulated deficit   (1,199,106)   (1,108,460)
Total stockholders’ equity   240,238    314,932 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity  $668,020   $739,253 
           

 

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 5 

 

 

 INTERCEPT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

   Three Months Ended 
   March 31, 
   2017   2016 
Revenue:          
Product revenue, net  $20,603   $- 
Licensing revenue   445    445 
Total revenue   21,048    445 
           
Operating expenses:          
Cost of sales   97    - 
Selling, general and administrative   61,082    95,865 
Research and development   43,832    31,980 
Total operating expenses   105,011    127,845 
Operating loss   (83,963)   (127,400)
           
Other income (expense):          
Interest expense   (7,207)   - 
Other income, net   1,240    726 
    (5,967)   726 
Net loss  $(89,930)  $(126,674)
           
Net loss per common and potential common share:          
Basic and diluted  $(3.61)  $(5.17)
           
Weighted average common and potential common shares outstanding:          
Basic and diluted   24,931    24,495 

   

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 6 

 

 

INTERCEPT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)

 

   Three Months Ended 
   March 31, 
   2017   2016 
     
Net loss  $(89,930)  $(126,674)
Other comprehensive loss:          
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities:          
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period   414    1,734 
Reclassification for recognized losses on marketable investment securities during the period   -    (80)
Net unrealized gains on marketable investment securities  $414   $1,654 
Foreign currency translation adjustments   205    (527)
Comprehensive loss  $(89,311)  $(125,547)

 

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 7 

 

 

INTERCEPT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)

 

   Three Months Ended March 31, 
   2017   2016 
         
Cash flows from operating activities:          
Net loss  $(89,930)  $(126,674)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:          
Share-based compensation   14,061    10,244 
Amortization of investment premium   1,022    1,543 
Amortization of deferred financing costs   343    - 
Depreciation   802    684 
Accretion of debt discount   3,126    - 
Changes in operating assets:          
Prepaid expenses and other current assets   (6,994)   (7,088)
Security deposits   1,414    - 
Accounts receivable   (1,499)   - 
Inventory   163    - 
Changes in operating liabilities:          
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities   (2,628)   (3,121)
Litigation settlement   -    55,000 
Long-term other liabilities   6,268    - 
Interest payable   (3,529)   - 
Deferred revenue   (119)   (445)
Net cash used in operating activities   (77,500)   (69,857)
Cash flows from investing activities:          
Purchases of investment securities   (21,246)   (35,318)
Sales of investment securities   125,285    123,006 
Purchases of equipment, leasehold improvements, and furniture and fixtures   (4,025)   (2,407)
Net cash provided by investing activities   100,014    85,281 
Cash flows from financing activities:          
Proceeds from exercise of options, net   556    1,486 
Net cash provided by financing activities   556    1,486 
Effect of exchange rate changes   205    (447)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents   23,275    16,463 
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of period   43,675    32,742 
Cash and cash equivalents – end of period  $66,950   $49,205 


See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 8 

 

 

INTERCEPT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

           

1.Overview of Business

     

Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Intercept” or the “Company”) is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of novel therapeutics to treat non-viral, progressive liver diseases, including primary biliary cholangitis (“PBC”), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (“NASH”), primary sclerosing cholangitis (“PSC”) and biliary atresia. Founded in 2002 in New York, Intercept now has operations in the United States, Europe and Canada.

   

2.Basis of Presentation

 

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain information that is normally required by U.S. GAAP has been condensed or omitted in accordance with rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period or for the year ending December 31, 2017. In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of these interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2016, included in the Company’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.

 

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations to conform to the current period presentation. The Company reclassified certain medical affairs costs of $5.4 million from research and development expense to selling, general and administrative expense on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses, revenues and related disclosures. Significant estimates include: clinical trial accruals, revenues and share-based compensation expense. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and other market-specific or other relevant assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from those estimates or assumptions.

 

3.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements of FASB ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition and most industry-specific guidance throughout the ASC, resulting in the creation of FASB ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 requires entities to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU provides alternative methods of adoption. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Deferral of the Effective Date (“ASU 2015-14”). ASU 2015-14 defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year to December 15, 2017 for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after that date and permits early adoption of the standard, but not before the original effective date for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) (“ASU 2016-08”) clarifying the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. Specifically, an entity is required to determine whether the nature of a promise is to provide the specified good or service itself (that is, the entity is a principal) or to arrange for the good or service to be provided to the customer by the other party (that is, the entity is an agent). The determination influences the timing and amount of revenue recognition. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, clarifying the implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations and licensing. Specifically, the amendments reduce the cost and complexity of identifying promised goods or services and improves the guidance for determining whether promises are separately identifiable. The amendments also provide implementation guidance on determining whether an entity’s promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied at a point in time) or a right to access the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied over time). The effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2016-08 and ASU 2016-10 are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2014-09. The Company is currently evaluating which transition approach it will utilize and the impact of adopting ASU 2014-09, ASU 2016-08 and ASU 2016-10 on its condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company will adopt these standards with an effective date of January 1, 2018.

 

 9 

 

 

On August 27, 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”), which requires an entity to evaluate whether conditions or events, in the aggregate, raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The guidance became effective January 1, 2017. The Company adopted ASU No. 2014-15 on January 1, 2017, and its adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

In January 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”). ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments; requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial assets on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements and clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. ASU 2016-01 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2016-01 will have on its condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (“ASU 2016-02”) which supersedes Topic 840, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on their balance sheets for all the leases with terms greater than twelve months. Based on certain criteria, leases will be classified as either financing or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. For leases with a term of twelve months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. If a lessee makes this election, it should recognize lease expense for such leases generally on a straight-line basis over the lease term. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. In transition, lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients primarily focused on leases that commenced before the effective date of Topic 842, including continuing to account for leases that commence before the effective date in accordance with previous guidance, unless the lease is modified. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of the standard on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (“ASU 2016-09”) which is intended to improve the accounting for share-based payment transactions as part of the FASB’s simplification initiative. The ASU changes certain aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including: (1) accounting for income taxes; (2) classification of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows; (3) forfeitures; (4) minimum statutory tax withholding requirements; and (5) classification of employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows when an employer withholds shares for tax withholding purposes. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those years for public business entities. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 during the first quarter of 2017. In connection with the adoption of this ASU, the Company elected to account for forfeitures as they occur and applied this change in accounting policy on a modified retrospective basis. As a result, the Company recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings which resulted in an increase to accumulated deficit of $0.7 million with an offsetting increase to additional paid-in capital (zero net total equity impact) as of the date of adoption, related to additional stock compensation expense that would have been recognized on unvested outstanding options unadjusted for estimated forfeitures. As a result of this guidance, the Company also recorded $58.7 million of additional deferred tax assets, which are fully offset by a valuation allowance. Other provisions of ASU 2016-09 had no impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4.Significant Agreements

  

Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co, Ltd. (Sumitomo Dainippon)

 

In March 2011, the Company entered into an exclusive license agreement with Sumitomo Dainippon to research, develop and commercialize OCA as a therapeutic for the treatment of PBC and NASH in Japan and China (excluding Taiwan). Under the terms of the license agreement, the Company received an up-front payment from Sumitomo Dainippon of $15.0 million and may be eligible to receive additional milestone payments of up to an aggregate of approximately $30.0 million in development milestones based on the initiation or completion of clinical trials, $70.0 million in regulatory approval milestones and $200.0 million in sales milestones. The regulatory approval milestones include $15.0 million for receiving marketing approval of OCA for NASH in Japan, $10.0 million for receiving marketing approval of OCA for NASH in China, and $5.0 million for receiving marketing approval of OCA for PBC in the United States, which was achieved upon the FDA approval of Ocaliva for the treatment of PBC in May 2016. As of March 31, 2017, the Company had achieved $6.0 million of the development milestones under its collaboration agreement with Sumitomo Dainippon. The sales milestones are based on aggregate sales amounts of OCA in the Sumitomo Dainippon territory and include $5.0 million for achieving net sales of $50.0 million, $10.0 million for achieving net sales of $100.0 million, $20.0 million for achieving net sales of $200.0 million, $40.0 million for achieving net sales of $400.0 million and $120.0 million for achieving net sales of $1.2 billion. The Company has determined that each potential future development, regulatory and sales milestone is substantive. In May 2014, Sumitomo Dainippon exercised its option under the license agreement to add Korea as part of its licensed territories and paid the Company a $1.0 million up-front fee. Sumitomo Dainippon has the option to add several other Asian countries to its territory to pursue OCA for additional indications. Sumitomo Dainippon will be responsible for the costs of developing and commercializing OCA in its territories. Sumitomo Dainippon is also required to make royalty payments ranging from the tens to the twenties in percent based on net sales of OCA products in the Sumitomo Dainippon territory.

 

 10 

 

 

The Company evaluated the license agreement with Sumitomo Dainippon and determined that it is a revenue arrangement with multiple deliverables, or performance obligations. The Company’s substantive performance obligations under this license include an exclusive license to its technology, technical and scientific support to the development plan and participation on a joint steering committee. The Company determined that these performance obligations represent a single unit of accounting, since, initially, the license does not have stand-alone value to Sumitomo Dainippon without the Company’s technical expertise and steering committee participation during the development of OCA. This development period is currently estimated as continuing through June 2020 and, as such, the up-front payment and payments made in respect of the Korea option are being recognized ratably over this period. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded licensing revenue of approximately $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

 

5.Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and investments as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

 

   As of March 31, 2017 
       Gross   Gross     
       Unrealized   Unrealized     
   Amortized Cost   Gains   Losses   Fair Value 
   (In thousands) 
Cash and cash equivalents:                    
Cash and money market funds  $66,950   $-   $-   $66,950 
Investment securities:                    
Commercial paper   64,828    -    (42)   64,786 
Corporate debt securities   453,145    12    (1,089)   452,068 
U.S. government and agency securities   24,250    -    (41)   24,209 
Total investments   542,223    12    (1,172)   541,063 
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments  $609,173   $12   $(1,172)  $608,013 

 

   As of December 31, 2016 
       Gross   Gross     
       Unrealized   Unrealized     
   Amortized Cost   Gains   Losses   Fair Value 
   (In thousands) 
Cash and cash equivalents:                    
Cash and money market funds  $43,675   $-   $-   $43,675 
Investment securities:                    
Commercial paper   66,185    -    (71)   66,114 
Corporate debt securities   554,847    14    (1,443)   553,418 
U.S. government and agency securities   26,254    -    (76)   26,178 
Total investments   647,286    14    (1,590)   645,710 
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments  $690,961   $14   $(1,590)  $689,385 

 

As of March 31, 2017, the Company held a total of three positions that were in a continuous unrealized loss position for more than twelve months. The Company has determined that the unrealized losses are deemed to be temporary impairments as of March 31, 2017. The Company believes that the unrealized losses generally are caused by increases in the risk premiums required by market participants rather than an adverse change in cash flows or a fundamental weakness in the credit quality of the issuer or underlying assets. Because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, it does not consider the investment in corporate debt securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2017.

  

6.Fixed Assets, Net

 

Fixed assets are stated at cost and depreciated or amortized using the straight-line method based on useful lives as follows:

 

             
             
   Useful lives         
   (Years)   March 31, 2017   December 31, 2016 
       (In thousands) 
Office equipment and software   3   $4,700   $4,942 
Leasehold improvements   Over life of lease    10,240    6,668 
Furniture and fixtures   7    4,516    4,202 
Subtotal        19,456    15,812 
Less: accumulated depreciation        (4,938)   (4,517)
Fixed assets, net       $14,518   $11,295 

 

 11 

 

 

7.Inventory

 

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Inventories consist of the following:

 

   March 31, 2017   December 31, 2016 
   (In thousands) 
Work-in-process  $2,040   $2,207 
Finished goods   76    72 
Inventory, net  $2,116   $2,279 

 

8.Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities consisted of the following:

 

   March 31, 2017   December 31, 2016 
   (In thousands) 
Accounts payable   7,279    6,722 
Accrued contracted services  $37,208   $35,429 
Accrued employee compensation   11,888    19,287 
Other liabilities    6,548    4,113 
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities  $62,923   $65,551 

  

9.Fair Value Measurements

 

The carrying amounts of the Company’s receivables and payables approximate their fair value due to their short maturities.

 

Accounting principles provide guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The guidance includes a three level hierarchy of valuation techniques used to measure fair value, defined as follows:

 

·Unadjusted Quoted Prices — The fair value of an asset or liability is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1).

 

·Pricing Models with Significant Observable Inputs — The fair value of an asset or liability is based on information derived from either an active market quoted price, which may require further adjustment based on the attributes of the financial asset or liability being measured, or an inactive market transaction (Level 2).
   
·Pricing Models with Significant Unobservable Inputs — The fair value of an asset or liability is primarily based on internally derived assumptions surrounding the timing and amount of expected cash flows for the financial instrument. Therefore, these assumptions are unobservable in either an active or inactive market (Level 3).

 

The Company considers an active market as one in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Conversely, the Company views an inactive market as one in which there are few transactions for the asset or liability, the prices are not current, or price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers. Where appropriate, non-performance risk, or that of a counterparty, is considered in determining the fair values of liabilities and assets, respectively.

 

The Company’s cash deposits and money market funds are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using bank balances or quoted market prices. Investments are classified as Level 2 instruments based on market pricing and other observable inputs.

 

Financial assets carried at fair value are classified in the tables below in one of the three categories described above:

 

       Fair Value Measurements Using 
   Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3 
   (In thousands) 
March 31, 2017                    
Assets:                    
Money market funds  $15,215   $15,215   $-   $- 
Available for sale securities:                    
Commercial paper   64,786    -    64,786    - 
Corporate debt securities   452,068    -    452,068    - 
U.S. government and agency securities   24,209    -    24,209    - 
Total financial assets:  $556,278   $15,215   $541,063   $- 
                     
December 31, 2016                    
Assets:                    
Money market funds  $11,755   $11,755   $-   $- 
Available for sale securities:                    
Commercial paper   66,114    -    66,114    - 
Corporate debt securities   553,418    -    553,418    - 
U.S. government and agency securities   26,178    -    26,178    - 
Total financial assets  $657,465   $11,755   $645,710   $- 

 

 12 

 

 

The estimated fair value of marketable debt securities (commercial paper, corporate debt securities and U.S. government and agency securities), by contractual maturity, are as follows:

 

   Fair Value as of 
   March 31, 2017   December 31, 2016 
   (In thousands) 
Due in one year or less  $452,468   $456,184 
Due after 1 year through 5 years   88,595    189,526 
Total investments in debt securities  $541,063   $645,710 

 

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without call or prepayment penalties.

 

10.Long-Term Debt

 

Debt, net of discounts and deferred financing costs, consists of the following:

 

   March 31, 2017   December 31, 2016 
   (In thousands) 
Long-term debt  $344,825   $341,356 
Less current portion   -    - 
Long-term debt outstanding  $344,825   $341,356 

 

On July 6, 2016, the Company issued $460.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 3.25% convertible senior notes due 2023 (“Convertible Notes”). The Company received net proceeds of $447.6 million after deducting underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses of approximately $12.4 million. The Company used approximately $38.4 million of the net proceeds from the offering to fund the payment of the cost of the capped call transactions that were entered into in connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes.

 

The Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company. Interest is payable semi-annually on January 1 and July 1 of each year, beginning on January 1, 2017. The Convertible Notes mature on July 1, 2023, unless earlier repurchased, redeemed or converted. The Convertible Notes are convertible at the option of holders, under certain circumstances and during certain periods, into cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination of cash and shares of the Company’s common stock, at the Company’s election. The initial conversion rate of the Convertible Notes is 5.0358 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $198.58 per share of the Company’s common stock. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. The Company may redeem for cash all or part of the Convertible Notes, at its option, on or after July 6, 2021, under certain circumstances at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Convertible Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date.

 

The capped call transactions are expected generally to reduce the potential dilution upon conversion of the Convertible Notes in the event that the market price per share of the Company’s common stock, as measured under the terms of the capped call transactions, is greater than the strike price of the capped call transactions, which initially corresponds to the conversion price of the Convertible Notes, and is subject to anti-dilution adjustments generally similar to those applicable to the conversion rate of the Convertible Notes. The cap price of the capped call transactions is initially $262.2725 per share, and is subject to certain adjustments under the terms of the capped call transactions. If, however, the market price per share of the Company’s common stock, as measured under the terms of the capped call transactions, exceeds the cap price of the capped call transactions, there would nevertheless be dilution upon conversion of the Convertible Notes to the extent that such market price exceeds the cap price of the capped call transactions.

 

In accordance with ASC Subtopic 470-20, the Company used an effective interest rate of 8.4% to determine the liability component of the Convertible Notes. This resulted in the recognition of $334.4 million as the liability component of the Convertible Notes and the recognition of the residual $113.1 million as the debt discount with a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital for the equity component of the Convertible Notes.

 

Interest expense was $7.2 million and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to the Convertible Notes. Accrued interest on the Convertible Notes was approximately $3.7 million and $7.3 million as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The Company recorded debt issuance costs of $12.4 million, which are being amortized using the effective interest method. As of March 31, 2017, $11.4 million of debt issuance costs are recorded on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet in Long-Term Debt, in accordance with ASU 2015-03. As of March 31, 2017, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $460.0 million related to the Convertible Notes.

 

 13 

 

 

11.Product Revenue, Net

 

The Company recognized net sales of Ocaliva of $20.6 million and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company also recorded $4.2 million and $3.9 million in short-term portion of deferred revenue on its balance sheet, which represents product shipped to distributors, but not sold through as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

 

The table below summarizes consolidated product revenue, net by region:

 

   Three Months Ended March 31, 
   2017   2016 
   (In thousands) 
Product revenue, net:          
U.S.  $19,777   $- 
ex-U.S.   826    - 
Total product revenue, net  $20,603   $- 

 

12.Stock Compensation

 

The 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (“2012 Plan”) became effective upon the pricing of the initial public offering in October 2012. At the same time, the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (“2003 Plan”) was terminated and 555,843 shares available under the 2003 Plan were added to the 2012 Plan.

 

On January 1, 2017, the numbers of shares reserved for issuance under the 2012 Plan was increased by 993,558 shares, as a result of the automatic increase in shares reserved pursuant to the terms thereof.

 

The estimated fair value of the options that have been granted under the 2003 and 2012 Plans is determined utilizing the Black-Scholes option-pricing model at the date of grant. The fair value of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) that have been granted under the 2012 Plan is determined utilizing the closing stock price on the date of grant.

 

The following table summarizes stock option activity during the three months ended March 31, 2017:

 

           Weighted     
           Average     
   Number   Weighted   Remaining   Aggregate 
   of Shares   Average   Contractual   Intrinsic Value 
   (In thousands)   Exercise Price   Term (years)   (In thousands) 
Outstanding at December 31, 2016   1,553   $117.80    7.4   $48,308 
Granted   405   $112.88    -   $- 
Exercised   (10)  $54.13    -   $- 
Cancelled/forfeited   (15)  $139.99    -   $- 
Expired   (6)  $163.97    -   $- 
Outstanding at March 31, 2017   1,927   $116.79    7.7   $51,693 
Expected to vest   1,927   $116.79    7.7   $51,693 
Exercisable   901   $94.24    6.2   $47,078 

 

As of March 31, 2017, there was approximately $68.2 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested stock options shown in the table above, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years.

 

 14 

 

 

The fair value of the Company's option awards were estimated using the assumptions below:

 

    Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2017    2016  
Volatility   60.9 - 65.4%   61.4 - 62.4%  
Expected term (in years)   6.0 - 9.9   5.1 - 10.0  
Risk-free rate   2.0 - 2.4%   1.1 - 1.8%  
Expected dividend yield   —%   —%  

 

The following table summarizes the aggregate RSU and RSA activity during the three months ended March 31, 2017:

 

       Weighted 
   Number of   Average Fair 
   Awards   Value 
   (In thousands)     
Non-vested shares outstanding, December 31, 2016   381   $136.89 
Granted   210   $112.83 
Vested   (70)  $123.80 
Forfeited   (7)  $138.23 
Non-vested shares outstanding, March 31, 2017   514   $128.84 

 

As of March 31, 2017, there was approximately $59.0 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested RSUs and RSAs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.8 years.

 

The Company accounts for forfeitures when they occur. Ultimately, the actual expense recognized over the vesting period will be for only those shares that vest. When performance based grants are issued, the Company recognizes no expense until achievement of the performance requirement is deemed probable.

 

Stock-based compensation expense has been reported in our statements of operations as follows:

 

   Three Months Ended March 31, 
   2017   2016 
   (In thousands) 
Selling, general and administrative  $8,974   $5,750 
Research and development   5,087    4,494 
Total stock-based compensation  $14,061   $10,244 

 

 15 

 

 

13.Net Loss Per Share

 

The following table presents the historical computation of basic and diluted net loss per share:  

 

   Three Months Ended March 31, 
   2017   2016 
   (In thousands, except per share amounts) 
Historical net loss per share          
Numerator:          
Net loss attributable to common stockholders  $(89,930)  $(126,674)
Denominator:          
Weighted average shares used in calculating net loss per share - basic and diluted   24,931    24,495 
           
Net loss per share:          
     Basic and diluted  $(3.61)  $(5.17)

 

The following potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the computations of diluted weighted average shares outstanding:

 

   Three Months Ended March 31, 
   2017   2016 
   (In thousands) 
Convertible Notes   2,316    - 
Options   1,927    1,663 
Restricted stock units   514    352 
Total   4,757    2,015 

 

 16 

 

 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with our unaudited financial statements and the notes to those financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2017. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve significant risks and uncertainties. As a result of many factors, such as those set forth in Item 1.A. “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and any updates to those risk factors contained in our subsequent periodic and current reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.

 

Overview

 

We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of novel therapeutics to treat non-viral, progressive liver diseases with high unmet medical need utilizing our proprietary bile acid chemistry. Our marketed product and clinical product candidates have the potential to treat orphan and more prevalent liver diseases for which, currently, there are limited therapeutic solutions.

 

Our lead product candidate, obeticholic acid, or OCA, is a bile acid analog, a chemical substance that has a structure based on a naturally occurring human bile acid, that selectively binds to and activates the farnesoid X receptor, or FXR. We believe OCA has broad liver-protective properties and may effectively counter a variety of chronic insults to the liver that cause fibrosis, or scarring, which can eventually lead to cirrhosis, liver transplant and death.

 

OCA was approved in the United States in May 2016 for use in patients with primary biliary cholangitis, or PBC, under the brand name Ocaliva®. We commenced sales and marketing of Ocaliva in the United States shortly after receiving such marketing approval, and Ocaliva is now available to patients primarily through a network of specialty pharmacy distributors. In December 2016, the European Commission granted conditional approval for Ocaliva for the treatment of PBC and we commenced our European commercial launch in January 2017. We have also filed for regulatory approval for OCA in PBC in Canada and plan to file for marketing authorization in other target markets.

  

OCA is also being developed to treat a variety of other non-viral progressive liver diseases such as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, or NASH, primary sclerosing cholangitis, or PSC, and biliary atresia. We are currently evaluating our future development strategy for OCA in other indications, for our product candidate INT-767 and for our pre-clinical candidates.

 

OCA has been tested in five placebo-controlled clinical trials, including a Phase 3 clinical trial in patients with PBC and two Phase 2 clinical trials in patients with NASH or a precursor disease to NASH known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, or NAFLD. OCA met the primary efficacy endpoint in each of these trials with statistical significance. In addition, in October 2015, we announced results from a Phase 2 dose ranging trial of OCA in 200 patients with NASH in Japan conducted by our collaborator, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., or Sumitomo Dainippon. The results of this trial were mixed. Sumitomo Dainippon has informed us that it is exploring the initiation of its registrational trials for OCA in NASH patients intended to support the registration of this indication in Japan.

 

OCA has received orphan drug designation in the United States and the European Union for the treatment of PBC and PSC and breakthrough therapy designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for the treatment of NASH patients with liver fibrosis.

 

OCA achieved the primary endpoint in a Phase 2b clinical trial for the treatment of NASH, known as the FLINT trial, which was sponsored by the U.S. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, or NIDDK, a part of the National Institutes of Health. The FLINT trial was completed in late July 2014. We have an ongoing Phase 3 clinical trial in non-cirrhotic NASH patients with liver fibrosis, known as the REGENERATE trial. REGENERATE includes a pre-planned histology-based interim analysis after 72 weeks of treatment. In May 2017, we completed enrollment of the interim analysis cohort for the REGENERATE trial. We anticipate top-line results from the interim analysis in the first half of 2019. We also have an ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial, known as the CONTROL trial, to characterize the lipid metabolic effects of OCA and cholesterol management effects of concomitant statin administration in NASH patients. We completed enrollment of the targeted number of patients for our CONTROL trial in October 2016 and expect top-line results in mid-2017. We continue to work towards expanding our overall NASH development program with additional trials and studies, including a Phase 3 trial in NASH patients with cirrhosis, which we expect to initiate in the second half of 2017.

 

In addition to PBC and NASH, we continue to invest in research of OCA for additional patient populations with other liver diseases. In September 2016, we completed enrollment of the targeted number of patients in our Phase 2 AESOP trial in PSC to evaluate the effects of 24 weeks of treatment with varying doses of OCA compared to placebo. We expect top-line results from the AESOP trial in mid-2017. In October 2015, we initiated a Phase 2 clinical trial, known as the CARE trial, of OCA in pediatric patients with biliary atresia. This trial will evaluate the effects of 11 weeks of OCA treatment where patients with biliary atresia will be randomized to varying doses of OCA or a control group receiving only their current treatment. We have completed a Phase 1 clinical trial of our second product candidate to enter clinical development, called INT-767, a dual FXR and TGR5 agonist, in healthy volunteers. We plan to initiate a Phase 2 trial of INT-767 in NASH patients with liver fibrosis in the second half of 2017.

 

 17 

 

 

Our current patents for OCA are scheduled to expire at various times through 2033. Our current plan is to commercialize OCA ourselves in the United States and Europe for the treatment of PBC, NASH and other indications primarily by targeting physicians who specialize in the treatment of liver and intestinal diseases, including both hepatologists and gastroenterologists. We own worldwide rights to OCA except for Japan, China and Korea, where we have exclusively licensed OCA to Sumitomo Dainippon along with an option to exclusively license OCA in certain other Asian countries. We own or have rights to various trademarks, copyrights and trade names used in our business, including Ocaliva.

 

Our net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately $89.9 million and $126.7 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2017, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $1.2 billion. Substantially all our net losses resulted from costs incurred in connection with our research and development programs and from selling, general and administrative costs associated with our operations.

 

We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for at least the next several years as we:

 

·continue to commercialize Ocaliva for PBC in the United States and Europe;
·seek regulatory approval for and prepare to commercially launch Ocaliva for PBC in other jurisdictions;
·develop and seek regulatory approval for OCA in NASH and other indications; and
·add infrastructure and personnel in the United States and internationally to support our product development and commercialization efforts and operations as a public company.

 

We anticipate that we will need to raise additional capital to commercialize OCA on a worldwide basis and continue our research and development activities in relation to OCA and our other pipeline candidates. Until we are able to consistently generate profits from our operations and become profitable, we expect to finance our operating activities through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, government or other third-party funding, marketing and distribution arrangements and other collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements. However, we may be unable to raise additional funds or enter into such other arrangements when needed on favorable terms or at all. Our failure to raise additional capital or enter into such other arrangements as and when needed would have a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to develop our product candidates.

 

Our principal executive offices are in New York, New York. We also have administrative offices in San Diego, California and London, United Kingdom.

 

Recent Developments

 

Completion of Enrollment of Phase 3 REGENERATE Trial Interim Analysis Cohort

 

On May 4, 2017, we announced the completion of enrollment of the interim analysis cohort for the Phase 3 REGENERATE trial. We anticipate top-line results from the interim analysis in the first half of 2019.

 

Appointment of David Ford as Chief Human Resources Officer

 

On May 4, 2017, we announced the appointment of David Ford as Chief Human Resources Officer effective May 8, 2017.

 

Mr. Ford, age 49, brings over 25 years of experience in a variety of human resources roles across the United States, Europe, Latin America and New Zealand. Prior to joining us, Mr. Ford spent nearly 15 years at Sanofi, where most recently he served as Vice President Human Resources for the Sanofi Genzyme global business unit starting in 2016. Prior to that role, from 2011 until 2016, Mr. Ford served as Vice President Human Resources for the Sanofi North American businesses. Mr. Ford joined the pharmaceutical industry in 2002 as the HR Director – United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland for Sanofi-Synthelabo. Mr. Ford holds a master’s degree in business administration from INSEAD, Fontainebleau (France).

 

Financial Overview

 

Revenue

 

We commenced our commercial launch of Ocaliva for use in PBC in the United States in June 2016. In December 2016, the European Commission granted conditional approval for Ocaliva for the treatment of PBC and we commenced our European commercial launch in January 2017.

 

Revenue is recognized when the four basic criteria of revenue recognition are met: (1) persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. When the revenue recognition criteria are not met, we defer the recognition of revenue by recording deferred revenue on the balance sheet until such time that all criteria are met.

 

 18 

 

 

Product Revenue, Net

   

We provide the right of return to our customers for unopened product for a limited time before and after its expiration date. Given our limited sales history for Ocaliva and the inherent uncertainties in estimating product returns, we have determined that the shipments of Ocaliva made to our customers thus far do not meet the criteria for revenue recognition at the time of shipment. Accordingly, we recognize revenue when the product is sold through by our customers, provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met. We invoice our customers upon shipment of Ocaliva to them and record accounts receivable, with a corresponding liability for deferred revenue equal to the gross invoice price. We then recognize revenue when Ocaliva is sold through as product is dispensed directly to the patients.

 

We recognized net sales of Ocaliva of $20.6 million and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We also recorded $4.2 million and $3.9 million in the short-term portion of deferred revenue on our balance sheet, which represents product shipped to distributors, but not sold through as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

 

We have written contracts with each of our customers and delivery occurs when the customer receives Ocaliva. We evaluate the creditworthiness of each of our customers to determine whether collection is reasonably assured. In order to conclude that the price is fixed and determinable, we must be able to (i) calculate our gross product revenues from the sales to our customers and (ii) reasonably estimate our net product revenues. We calculate gross product revenues based on the wholesale acquisition cost that we charges our customers for Ocaliva. We estimate net product revenues by deducting from our gross product revenues (i) trade allowances, such as invoice discounts for prompt payment and customer fees, (ii) estimated government rebates and discounts related to Medicare, Medicaid and other government programs, and (iii) estimated costs of incentives offered to certain indirect customers including patients.

 

Licensing Revenue

 

We recognize revenue derived from our collaborative agreements for the development and commercialization of certain of our product candidates. In March 2011, we entered into an exclusive licensing agreement with Sumitomo Dainippon for the development of OCA in Japan, China and Korea. Under the terms of the agreement, we have received up-front payments of $16.0 million, including $1.0 million upon the exercise by Sumitomo Dainippon of its option to add Korea to its licensed territories, and may be eligible to receive up to approximately $300.0 million in additional payments for development, regulatory and commercial sales milestones for OCA in the licensed territories. As of March 31, 2017, we have achieved $6.0 million of the development and regulatory milestones.

 

For accounting purposes, the up-front payments are recorded as deferred revenue and amortized over time and milestone payments are recognized once earned. We recognized $0.4 million in license revenue resulting from the amortization of the up-front payments under the collaboration agreement for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. We anticipate that we will recognize revenue of approximately $1.8 million per year through 2020, for the amortization of the relevant up-front collaboration payments from Sumitomo Dainippon.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

 

Our selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding the one-time net expense of $45.0 million attributable to the settlement of a purported securities class action lawsuit in 2016, have increased and we expect to continue to incur significant expenses due to the commercialization of Ocaliva for PBC in the United States and Europe, the potential commercialization of OCA in PBC in other international markets and development activities for OCA in indications other than PBC and other product candidates. We further plan on expanding our operations both in the United States and abroad, which will increase our selling, general and administration expenses. We believe that these activities will result in costs related to the hiring of additional personnel, fees for outside consultants, lawyers and accountants, and the maintenance of facilities. We have also incurred and expect to continue to incur increased costs to comply with corporate governance, internal controls, compliance and similar requirements applicable to public companies with expanding operations and biopharmaceutical companies undertaking worldwide product launches.

 

Research and Development Expenses

 

Since our inception, we have focused significant resources on our research and development activities, including conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials, manufacturing development efforts and activities related to regulatory filings for our product candidates. We recognize research and development expenses as they are incurred.

 

Our research and development expenses have increased and we expect to continue to incur significant expenses due to our preclinical studies and clinical trials and other research and development efforts. We anticipate that our research and development expenses will be substantial for the foreseeable future as we continue the development of OCA for the treatment of PBC, NASH and PSC and other indications and to further advance the development of our other product candidates, subject to the availability of additional funding.

 

 19 

 

 

Results of Operations

 

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016

 

The following table summarizes our results of operations for each of the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, together with the changes in those items in dollars:

 

   Three Months Ended March 31,   Dollar Change 
   2017   2016     
   (In thousands) 
Revenue:               
Product revenue, net  $20,603   $-   $20,603 
Licensing revenue   445    445    - 
Total revenue   21,048    445    20,603 
Operating expenses:               
Cost of sales   97    -    97 
Selling, general and administrative   61,082    95,865    (34,783)
Research and development   43,832    31,980    11,852 
Total operating expenses   105,011    127,845    (22,834)
Operating loss   (83,963)   (127,400)   43,437 
Other income (expense):               
Interest expense   (7,207)   -    (7,207)
Other income, net   1,240    726    514 
    (5,967)   726    (6,693)
Net loss  $(89,930)  $(126,674)  $36,744 

 

Revenues
 

Product revenue, net was approximately $20.6 million and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We commenced our commercial launch in the United States for Ocaliva in PBC in June 2016 and in certain European countries in 2017. We recognized product revenue, net of $19.8 million and $0.8 million in the U.S. and ex-U.S. countries, respectively, in the three months ended March 31, 2017. For each of the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, licensing revenue was approximately $0.4 million which resulted from the recognition of development and regulatory milestones and amortization of the up-front payments under the collaboration agreement with Sumitomo Dainippon.

 

Cost of sales

 

Cost of sales was $0.1 million and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, due to the commercial launch in the United States for Ocaliva in PBC in June 2016 and in certain European countries in 2017.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 Selling, general and administrative expenses were $61.1 million and $95.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The $34.8 million net decrease between periods is primarily due to the one-time net expense of $45.0 million attributable to the settlement of a purported securities class action lawsuit in 2016, along with decreases in indirect expenses (rent, travel, and product-related legal costs) of $3.0 million and consultant spend of $4.8 million. These decreases were partially offset by increased expenses of approximately $12.1 million in Ocaliva commercialization activities and market research and additional personnel-related costs of approximately $6.1 million to support our commercial and international initiatives.

 

Research and development expenses

 

Research and development expenses were $43.8 million and $32.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, representing a net increase of $11.8 million. This net increase in research and development expense primarily reflects increases in OCA research and development activities of approximately $11.6 million to support our development activities and an increase of $0.9 million of compensation-related costs, partially offset by a decrease in INT-767 research and development activities of $0.7 million.

 

 20 

 

 

Interest expense

 

Interest expense was $7.2 million and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively due to the issuance of our 3.25% convertible senior notes due 2023 or Convertible Notes, in July 2016.

 

Other income, net

 

Other income, net was $1.2 million and $0.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The $0.5 million increase is primarily attributable to interest income earned on cash, cash equivalents and investment securities, which increased compared to the prior year period primarily due to the net proceeds from the issuance of our Convertible Notes in July 2016.

 

Income taxes

 

For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, no income tax expense or benefit was recognized. Our deferred tax assets are comprised primarily of net operating loss carryforwards. We maintain a full valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets since we have not yet achieved sustained profitable operations. As a result, we have not recorded any income tax benefit since our inception.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Sources of Liquidity

 

As of March 31, 2017, we had an accumulated deficit of $1.2 billion. We anticipate that we will continue to incur losses for at least the next several years. We expect that our research and development and selling, general and administrative expenses will continue to be significant and, as a result, we will need additional capital to fund our operations, which we may seek to obtain through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, government or other third-party funding, marketing and distribution arrangements and other collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements.

 

We have funded our operations primarily through the sale of common stock, preferred stock, convertible notes and warrants and payments received under our collaboration agreements totaling approximately $1.4 billion (net of issuance costs of $46.1 million). As of March 31, 2017, we had cash, cash equivalents and investment securities of $608.0 million. Cash in excess of immediate requirements is invested in accordance with our investment policy, primarily with a view to liquidity and capital preservation. Currently, our funds are held in cash and money market bank accounts and investments, all of which have maturities of less than two years.

 

Cash Flows

 

The following table sets forth the significant sources and uses of cash for the periods set forth below:

 

   Three Months Ended March 31, 
   2017   2016 
   (In thousands) 
Net cash provided by (used in):          
Operating activities  $(77,500)  $(69,857)
Investing activities   100,014    85,281 
Financing activities   556    1,486 

 

Operating Activities. Net cash used in operating activities of approximately $77.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017 was primarily a result of our $89.9 million net loss and a net decrease in operating assets and liabilities of $6.9 million, partially offset by $14.1 million in share-based compensation, $3.1 million for accretion of the discount on our Convertible Notes, $1.0 million for the amortization of investment premium and $0.8 million of depreciation.

 

Net cash used in operating activities of $69.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016 was primarily a result of our $126.7 million net loss, partially offset by $10.2 million for share-based compensation, the amortization of investment premium of $1.5 million and net changes in operating assets and liabilities of $10.2 million, including the $45.0 million net expense for the settlement of the purported class action lawsuit.

 

Investing Activities.  For the three months ended March 31, 2017, net cash provided by investing activities primarily reflects the sale of investment securities of $125.3 million, partially offset by the purchase of investment securities of $21.2 million and $4.0 million of capital expenditures related to the build out of our new corporate office.

 

For the three months ended March 31, 2016, net cash provided by investing activities primarily reflects the sale of investment securities of $123.0 million, partially offset by the purchase of investment securities of $35.3 million and $2.4 million of capital expenditures related to our offices.

 

 21 

 

 

Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2017 consisted primarily of $0.6 million from the exercise of options to purchase common stock.

 

Net cash provided by financing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2016 consisted primarily of $1.5 million from the exercise of options to purchase common stock.

 

Future Funding Requirements

 

While we commenced our commercial launch of Ocaliva for use in PBC in the United States and Europe, we cannot predict the period, if any, in which material net cash inflows from sales of OCA or our other product candidates can sustain our operations. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses in connection with our ongoing development activities, particularly as we continue the research, development and clinical trials of, and seek regulatory approval for, our product candidates.

 

We have incurred and expect to incur additional costs associated with our plans to further expand our operations in the United States, Europe and in certain other countries. In addition, subject to obtaining regulatory approval of any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses for product sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution. As part of our longer-term strategy, we also anticipate incurring expenses in connection with increases in our product development, scientific, commercial and administrative personnel and expansion of our infrastructure in the United States and abroad. We anticipate that we will need substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations.

 

As of March 31, 2017, we had $608.0 million in cash, cash equivalents and investment securities. We currently project adjusted operating expenses in the range of $380 million to $420 million in the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, which excludes stock-based compensation and other non-cash items. These expenses are planned to support the continued commercialization of Ocaliva in PBC in the United States and other markets, the continued clinical development for OCA in PBC and NASH and PSC and the continued development of INT-767 and our other earlier stage pipeline programs. We may make additional investments over 2017 as our business evolves. Our adjusted operating expense estimate for 2017 is higher than our adjusted operating expenses for 2016 reflecting continued investment in clinical development programs and commercialization activities.

 

Adjusted operating expense is a financial measure not calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. For the year ended December 31, 2016, adjusted operating expense also excludes a one-time $45 million net expense for the settlement of a purported class action lawsuit. Other than the net class action lawsuit settlement amount, which is a one-time expense, we anticipate that stock-based compensation expense will represent the most significant non-cash item that is excluded in adjusted operating expenses as compared to operating expenses under GAAP. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for more information.

 

Due to the many variables inherent to the development and commercialization of novel therapies and our rapid growth and expansion, we currently cannot accurately and precisely predict the duration beyond mid-2018 over which we expect our cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements. However, we currently believe that our cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient for us to:

 

·continue the initial commercialization of Ocaliva for PBC in the United States and the European Union;
·prepare for and initiate the commercial launch of Ocaliva in PBC in certain other target markets across the world, but not commercially launch Ocaliva in PBC in non-target countries across the world;
·continue and expand our clinical development programs for OCA in PBC and NASH, such as continuing, but not completing, our planned Phase 3 clinical program for OCA in NASH, including the REGENERATE trial, and our ongoing COBALT confirmatory clinical outcomes trial of OCA in PBC; and
·advance the continued development of INT-767, for which we completed a Phase 1 clinical trial in 2016, and our preclinical compounds, but not completing the clinical or preclinical development needed to obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize INT-767 or our preclinical compounds.

 

Accordingly, we will continue to require substantial additional capital in connection with our continuing operations, including continuing our commercialization plans and our research and development activities and building our global infrastructure to support these activities.

 

The amount and timing of our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including:

 

·the rate of progress and cost of our continued commercialization activities for Ocaliva in PBC in the United States and the European Union;
·our ability to receive marketing approval of Ocaliva for PBC in countries outside of the United States and the European Union based on our regulatory submissions package and our work completed to date, including the willingness of the relevant regulatory authorities to accept the POISE trial, which is our completed Phase 3 clinical trial for PBC;

 

 22 

 

 

·the degree of effort and time needed to prepare for and initiate the commercial launches of Ocaliva in PBC outside of the United States and the European Union if we receive marketing authorization;
·the progress, costs, results of and timing of our clinical development programs for OCA in PBC, NASH and other indications, such as the sufficiency of the REGENERATE trial to be accepted as the sole pivotal trial for marketing approval or the acceptability of a surrogate endpoint for accelerated approval of OCA for the treatment of NASH and any modifications we may be required to make to the COBALT trial as part of our post-marketing requirements to the FDA or the EMA;
·the outcome, costs and timing of seeking and obtaining FDA, EMA and any other regulatory approvals;
·the expansion of our research and development activities and the product candidates that we pursue, including INT-767 and our product candidates in preclinical development such as INT-777;
·the expansion of our operations, personnel and the size of our company and our need to continue to expand in the longer term;
·the costs associated with securing and establishing manufacturing capabilities and procuring the materials necessary for our products and product candidates;
·market acceptance of our products and product candidates, which may be affected by reimbursement from payors;
·the costs of acquiring, licensing or investing in businesses, products, product candidates and technologies;
·our ability to maintain, expand and defend the scope of our intellectual property portfolio, including the amount and timing of any payments we may be required to make, or that we may receive, in connection with the licensing, filing, prosecution, defense and enforcement of any patents or other intellectual property rights;
·the effect of competing technological and market developments; and

·other cash needs that may arise as we continue to operate our business.

 

We have no committed external sources of funding. Until such time, if ever, as we can consistently generate profits from our operations and become profitable, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, government or other third-party funding, marketing and distribution arrangements and other collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interests of our common stockholders will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of our common stockholders. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional funds through government or other third-party funding, marketing and distribution arrangements or other collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us.

 

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

 

There have been no material changes to our contractual obligations and commitments outside the ordinary course of business from those disclosed under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Contractual Obligations and Commitments” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

As of March 31, 2017, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

 

Our primary exposure to market risk is interest income sensitivity, which is affected by changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates and there have been no material changes since our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures 

 

Our disclosure controls are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act as of March 31, 2017, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective.

 

 23 

 

  

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

As a result of our initial commercialization in the quarter ended June 30, 2016, we implemented processes and internal controls to record product revenues, deferred revenues, cost of sales and inventory. The implementation of these processes resulted in changes to our internal controls over financial reporting, which we believe were material. Further, we plan to continue to evaluate and enhance the design and documentation of our internal control over financial reporting process related to the recording of product revenues, cost of sales and inventory to maintain effective controls over our financial reporting.

 

PART II
OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

 

From time to time, we are party to legal proceedings in the course of our business. We do not, however, expect such pending legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

 

There have been no material changes to our risk factors contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016 and any updates to those risk factors contained in our subsequent periodic and current reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. For a further discussion of our Risk Factors, refer to the “Risk Factors” discussion contained in such filings.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

Set forth below is information regarding securities sold by us during the three months ended March 31, 2017 that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Securities Act. Also included is the consideration, if any, received by us for the securities and information relating to the section of the Securities Act, or rule of the Securities and Exchange Commission, under which exemption from registration was claimed.

 

Between January 1 and March 31, 2017, we did not issue or sell any shares on an unregistered basis.

  

Purchase of Equity Securities

 

We did not purchase any of our registered equity securities during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

 

None.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

 

None.

 

Item 5. Other Information.

 

None.

 

Item 6. Exhibits.

 

The exhibits filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are set forth on the Exhibit Index, which Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.

  

 24 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

INTERCEPT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

 

Date: May 10, 2017 By: /s/ Mark Pruzanski
    Mark Pruzanski, M.D.
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)
     
Date: May 10, 2017 By: /s/ Sandip Kapadia
    Sandip Kapadia
    Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial Officer)

 

 25 

 

 

Exhibit Index

 

Exhibit

Number

  Description of Exhibit
     

10.1 

  Employment Agreement by and between the Registrant and Jerome B. Durso, effective as of February 15, 2017.+
     
31.1   Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
31.2   Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
32.1   Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
101  

The following materials from the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2017, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, 2016 (audited), (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited), (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the three month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three month periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited) and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).

 

+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

 

 26