10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark one)

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

or

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

Commission File Number 001-34082
Kona Grill, Inc.(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware	20-0216690
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

7150 East Camelback Road, Suite 333
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
(480) 922-8100(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of principal executive offices)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share Preferred Stock Purchase Rights Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered NASDAQ Global Market NASDAQ Global Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section15(d) of the Act.

Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ☐    Accelerated filer ☒    Non-accelerated filer ☐      Smaller reporting company ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, June 30, 2016, was $72,500,000, calculated based on the closing price of the registrant’s common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Global Market. For purposes of this computation, all officers, directors, and 10% beneficial owners of the registrant are deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed to be an admission that such officers, directors, or 10% beneficial owners are, in fact, affiliates of the registrant.

As of February 28, 2017, there were 10,081,444 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed with the Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

KONA GRILL, INC.
Annual Report on Form 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Item 1.	Business	1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	11
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	24
Item 2.	Properties	24
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	25
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	25
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	25
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	28
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	29
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	43
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	43
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	43
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	44
Item 9B.	Other Information	44
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	45
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	45
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	45
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	45
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	45
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	45
Signatures		47
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-1

Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

The statements contained in this report on Form 10-K that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our “expectations,” “anticipation,” “intentions,” “beliefs,” or “strategies” regarding the future. Forward-looking statements relating to our future economic performance, plans and objectives for future operations, and projections of sales and other financial items are based on our beliefs as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to us. Actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated as a result of a number of factors, including those discussed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”

PART I

Item 1. Business

Overview

Kona Grill, Inc. (referred to herein as the “Company” or “we,” “us,” and “our”) currently owns and operates 45 upscale casual restaurants in 23 states and Puerto Rico. Our restaurants offer freshly prepared food, attentive service, and an upscale contemporary ambiance that create an exceptional, yet affordable dining experience that we believe exceeds many traditional casual dining restaurants with whom we compete. Our high-volume upscale casual restaurants feature a global menu of contemporary American favorites, award-winning sushi and specialty cocktails. Our menu items are prepared from scratch at each restaurant location and incorporate over 40 signature sauces and dressings, creating memorable flavor profiles that appeal to a diverse group of customers. Our diverse menu is complemented by a full service bar offering a broad assortment of wines, specialty cocktails, and beers. We believe that our innovative high-quality recipes, generous portions, and flexible price points provide customers with an excellent value proposition and allow us to attract a diverse customer base.

Our restaurants seat an average of approximately 290 customers and are comprised of multiple dining areas that incorporate modern design elements to create an upscale ambiance that reinforces our high standards of food and service. Our main dining area, full-service bar, indoor/outdoor patio, and sushi bar provide a choice of atmospheres and a variety of environments designed to attract new customers and encourage repeat visits from regular customers. We locate our restaurants in high-activity areas such as retail centers, shopping malls, and lifestyle centers that are situated near commercial office space and residential housing to attract customers throughout the day.

We believe that the portability of our concept has been successfully demonstrated in a variety of markets across the United States (U.S.). We plan to grow organically through unit expansion and by strategically expanding the Kona Grill concept in both new and existing markets. We continue to execute our strategy for international market franchise expansion. Given the strength our concept has enjoyed thus far in the U.S. and the increased demand for upscale casual dining concepts overseas, we believe there is a significant opportunity to expand our concept in Latin America, the Middle East and beyond through franchising.

Competitive Strengths

The restaurant business is intensely competitive with respect to food quality, price-value relationships, ambiance, service and location. We believe that the key strengths of our business include the following:

● Innovative Menu Selections with Mainstream Appeal. We offer a menu of freshly prepared, high quality food that includes a diverse selection of contemporary American favorites and award-winning sushi items to appeal to a wide range of tastes, preferences, and price points. We prepare our dishes from scratch at each restaurant location using original recipes with generous portions and creative and appealing presentations that adhere to standards that we believe are much closer to fine dining than typical casual dining. Our more than 40 signature sauces and dressings create memorable flavor profiles and further differentiate our menu items. With an average check during 2016 of approximately $26 per customer, we believe we provide an exceptional price-value proposition that helps create a lasting relationship between Kona Grill and our customers.

● Distinctive Upscale Casual Dining Experience. Our upscale casual dining concept captures some of the best elements of fine dining including a variety of exceptional food options, attentive service, and an extensive wine and cocktail list, and combines them with the traditional casual dining attributes, like a broad menu with attractive price points and a choice of environments suitable for any dining occasion. Our creative menu, personalized service, and contemporary restaurant design blend together to create an inviting upscale casual dining experience. We design our restaurants with a unique layout and utilize modern, eye-catching design elements to enhance the customer experience. Our multiple dining areas provide customers with a number of distinct dining environments and atmospheres to suit a range of dining occasions. Our open exhibition-style kitchen and sushi bar further emphasize the quality and freshness of our food that are the cornerstones of our concept.

1

● Significant Bar and Happy Hour Business. Our high-energy bar and patio offer a distinctive atmosphere where customers can enjoy our alcoholic beverage offerings. Our patio is a popular place for customers to enjoy our high-value happy hour and reverse happy hour offerings, where full portions of select items are offered at reduced price points. Our patio, which is enclosed in colder climate locations, provides a year-round sales opportunity and is a key driver in generating business during non-traditional periods. Aggregate restaurant sales during these non-peak periods accounted for 24.0% of our total sales during 2016, which we believe provides us with a competitive advantage.

● Personalized Customer Service. Our commitment to provide prompt, friendly, and efficient service enhances our food, reinforces our upscale ambiance, and helps distinguish us from other traditional casual dining restaurants. We train our service personnel to be cordial, friendly, and knowledgeable about all aspects of the restaurant, especially the menu and the wine list, which helps us provide personalized customer service that is designed to ensure an enjoyable dining experience and exceed our customers’ expectations. Our kitchen staff completes extensive training to ensure that menu items are precisely prepared to provide a consistent quality of taste. We believe our focus on high service standards underscores our customer-centric philosophy.

● Multiple Daypart Model. Our appetizers, entrees, and sushi offerings provide a flexible selection of items that can be ordered individually or shared allowing customers to dine with us during traditional lunch and dinner meal periods as well as between customary dining periods such as in the late afternoon and late night. The lively ambiance of our patio and bar areas provides an energetic social forum that attracts a young professional clientele during non-peak periods, as well as provides a unique atmosphere for all of our customers to enjoy before or after they dine with us. Our sushi bar provides another dining venue for customers while offering a wide selection of creative and flavorful menu items for our health conscious customers. We believe that our ability to attract customers throughout the day distinguishes us from many other casual dining chains and helps us maximize sales and leverage our fixed operating costs.

● Attractive Unit Economics. During 2016, the average unit volume of our comparable base restaurants was $4.5 million. We believe our high average unit volume helps us attract high-quality employees, leverage fixed costs, and makes us a desirable tenant for landlords. We expect the average cash investment for new restaurants to be approximately $2.6 million, net of landlord tenant improvement allowances and excluding preopening expenses. Based on historical experience, restaurants that are subject to ground leases and do not receive landlord tenant improvement allowances may require a significantly higher cash investment, but typically have lower average rental costs over the duration of the lease.

Growth Strategy

We believe that there are significant opportunities to grow our sales and increase our brand awareness throughout the United States and internationally. The following sets forth the key elements of our growth strategy.

Pursue Disciplined Restaurant Growth

We review potential sites in both new and existing markets that meet our target customer demographics, real estate, and investment return criteria. We believe the location of our restaurants plays a pivotal role in determining the long-term profitability of each restaurant and, accordingly, we spend significant time and resources to evaluate each prospective site. We utilize a disciplined site selection process involving our management team and Board of Directors. Our site selection criteria for new restaurants include locating our restaurants near high activity areas such as retail centers, shopping malls, and lifestyle and entertainment centers. In addition, we focus on areas that have above-average density and income populations, have high customer traffic throughout the day from thriving businesses or retail markets, and are convenient for and appealing to business and leisure travelers. We also focus on sites that have great visibility and ample parking to support high volumes of traffic.

2

We achieved a unit growth rate of 22% for 2016, with eight openings during the year and grew 23% during 2015 with seven restaurant openings. We plan to open three restaurants in 2017. We are adjusting our projected growth rate for 2017 below our previously targeted growth rate of 20%. We believe that a more moderate growth rate will provide us the flexibility to allocate capital resources, increase our earnings and strengthen our balance sheet as well as, to focus our time and attention on new restaurant operations and performance.

Our growth strategy for developing new restaurants also includes expansion in existing markets that have the appropriate demographics to support multiple restaurants. Operating multiple restaurants in existing markets enables us to leverage our brand equity as well as gain operating efficiencies associated with regional supervision, marketing, purchasing, and hiring. In addition, our ability to hire qualified employees is enhanced in markets where we enjoy greater brand awareness and we are able to utilize existing employees in new restaurants. Our expansion plans currently do not involve any franchised restaurant operations in the U.S. We continue working diligently to build our pipeline for future growth.

In addition, we continue to execute our strategy for international market expansion. Given the strength our concept has enjoyed thus far in the U.S. and the increased demand for upscale casual dining concepts overseas, we believe there is a significant opportunity to expand our concept in Latin America, the Middle East and beyond. Similar to other brands with an international presence, we are utilizing a franchise model for development outside of the U.S. Under this model, we will provide training and operational support to our partners without committing, or putting at risk, capital for restaurant construction in these international markets. During the first half of 2016, we announced agreements for the development and franchising of six Kona Grill restaurants in Mexico and six restaurants in the United Arab Emirates over the next seven years. We expect each of our international franchise partners to open a Kona Grill restaurant in their respective country during 2017.

Grow Existing Restaurant Sales

Our goal for existing restaurants is to increase unit volumes through the execution of our differentiated business model and complemented with ongoing social marketing efforts as well as local market advertising and other initiatives designed to generate awareness and trial of our concept and increase the frequency of customer visits. We believe the strength of our differentiated concept and the appeal of our new design enables us to gain market share, as evidenced by positive same-store sales growth in each of the last six years. Our restaurant sales for comparable base restaurants, which include those units open for more than 18 months, increased 0.5% compared to 2015. The increase reflects a 2.4% increase in average check per person customer partially offsetting a 1.9% decrease in customer traffic.

We also continue to focus on our four wall execution with key initiatives designed to drive traffic, increase sales and enhance the customer experience while building our business for long-term growth. We have enhanced our cocktail and wine list and continue to utilize our Wine Down Wednesday offering to drive customer traffic by offering a 50% discount on bottle wines each Wednesday. Our value-driven happy hour price-points help drive incremental sales and customer traffic during non-peak hours. We offer online ordering for the convenience of our customers and have also partnered with several companies for delivery services to drive incremental sales growth.

Furthermore, we continue to focus on the quality of our service and hospitality with extensive training for our service staff on our wine list, drink and menu offerings. We continue to grow our customer loyalty program, Konavore™, which has grown to over 280,000 members. We utilize this e-mail based program to communicate new menu offerings, restaurant specific events, and other marketing messages to keep Kona Grill top of mind for consumers. We have also increased our presence in social marketing and interactive advertising. Furthermore, we utilize a social software platform to aggregate feedback posted by our customers on various social media sites to ensure that our management team can review and respond to our customers’ comments immediately. We believe we can generate additional sales through these programs at a reasonable cost per restaurant.

3

Continue Strategic Investments in Personnel and Systems

We believe that successful execution of our growth strategies will enable Kona Grill to be a leading upscale casual dining restaurant operator in the U.S. During the past three years, we have made strategic personnel investments in order to build the foundation for the expansion of our concept and will continue making incremental investments to support our new unit expansion and international business development initiatives. Additionally, we continue to implement software and tools to enhance our business while ensuring that strong financial controls are in place to minimize risks associated with our growth strategy.

Expansion Strategy and Site Selection

We believe the location of our restaurants is critical to our long-term success and, accordingly, we devote significant time and resources to analyzing each prospective site. Our restaurant expansion strategy focuses primarily on penetrating new markets in major metropolitan areas throughout the U.S. and existing markets where demographic information supports the building of additional restaurants. In general, we prefer to open restaurants in high-profile sites within specific trade areas with the following considerations:

● suitable demographic characteristics, including residential and commercial population density and above-average household incomes;

● great visibility;

● high traffic patterns;

● general accessibility;

● availability of suitable parking;

● proximity of shopping areas and office parks;

● degree of competition and the operating performance of those competitors within the trade area; and

● general availability of restaurant-level employees.

These sites generally include high-volume retail centers, shopping malls, and lifestyle and entertainment centers.

We thoroughly analyze each prospective location before presenting the site to our Real Estate Committee, comprised of members of the Board of Directors, for review. Prior to committing to a restaurant site and signing a lease, our Chief Executive Officer, Vice President of Development and at least one member of the Real Estate Committee visits the prospective site and evaluate the proposed economics of the restaurant based on demographic data and other relevant criteria to assure that the site meets our criteria for anticipated return on investment.

We lease all of our restaurant sites under lease terms that vary by restaurant; however, we generally lease space (freestanding or in-line) for 10 to 20 years and attempt to negotiate at least two five-year renewal options. Our rent structures vary from lease to lease, but generally provide for the payment of both minimum base rent and contingent rent based on restaurant sales. We are also generally responsible for a proportionate share of common area maintenance, property tax, insurance, and other occupancy-related expenses.

4

We believe our high average unit volumes, differentiated menu and multi-daypart model make us an attractive tenant and provide us with multiple opportunities to obtain suitable leasing terms from landlords. As a result of the locations we select, which are often in new lifestyle center or shopping mall developments, our restaurant development timeframes vary according to the landlord’s construction schedule and other factors that are beyond our control. Once the site has been turned over to us, the typical lead-time from commencement of construction to opening is approximately six months.

Unit Economics

We target a 30% net cash-on-cash return for our restaurants once they reach their mature level of operations. Maturation periods vary from restaurant to restaurant, but generally range from two to four years. Our targeted margin for mature restaurants ranges from 18% to 19%. The cash-based performance target for our operating restaurant operations does not include field supervision, corporate support expenses, preopening expenses, or non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization; and does not represent a targeted return on investment in our common stock.

Our investment cost for new restaurants varies significantly depending upon the location of the restaurant, the type of lease entered into and the amount of tenant improvement allowance we receive from landlords. We expect the cash investment cost of our prototype restaurant on average to be approximately $2.6 million, net of landlord tenant improvement allowances averaging between $0.7 million and $1.2 million, and excluding cash preopening expenses of approximately $450,000.

Our ability to generate sales throughout the day is a key strength of our concept. The following table depicts the amount and percentage of contribution for each daypart of overall restaurant sales during 2016.

2016 Sales by Daypart

	Sales		Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)
Lunch (Open to 3 p.m.)	$	41,987		24.8	%
Dinner (5 p.m. to 9 p.m.)		86,849		51.2	%
Non-Peak (3 p.m. to 5 p.m. and 9 p.m. to Close)		40,687		24.0	%
Total All Day	$	169,523		100.0	%

Menu

Our menu features a selection of appetizers, salads, soups, flatbreads, sandwiches, noodles, seafood, signature entrees, and desserts. Our appetizers include socially interactive items that can be eaten individually or easily shared among customers. Our signature entrees feature various sauces and offer customers generous portions that are impressive in presentation and in taste. For example, our most popular entrée is the Macadamia Nut Chicken served with shoyu-cream sauce and accompanied by parmesan garlic mashed potatoes and seasonal vegetables. Other favorites include Miso-Sake Sea Bass served with shrimp and pork fried rice and a seasonal vegetable and Pan-Seared Ahi served with steamed white rice, baby bok choy and a sweet chili sauce.

We also offer an extensive assortment of sushi that includes traditional favorites as well as distinctive specialty sushi and sashimi items such as our Voodoo Roll made with spicy crawfish mix and avocado rolled inside of seaweed and topped with a habanero tuna mix and chili masago, or the Bama Roll made with crab mix, cream cheese and jalapeno in soy paper topped with tuna, avocado, fish roe and spicy mayo. Sushi sales accounted for 25.6% of our total restaurant sales during 2016.

5

Our menu, coupled with an expansive selection of sushi, offers ample choices for health conscious customers. We take great pride in providing our customers the full Kona Grill experience without compromising their dietary needs and restrictions. We offer extensive gluten-free, vegetarian and vegan menus. We also feature a bento box with a variety of selections of protein and side dishes for the enjoyment of our young customers.

Each of our restaurants has a dedicated kitchen staff member, whom we refer to as our saucier, to oversee the preparation of more than 40 signature sauces and dressings that are made from scratch using only high-quality ingredients and fresh products. Each sauce is designed according to a proprietary recipe for specific menu items and includes unique flavors and combinations such as our honey cilantro, shoyu-cream, and spicy aioli dipping sauces, and our sesame-soy and honey dijon dressings. We believe that these distinctive sauces and dressings provide a unique flavor profile, which further distinguishes Kona Grill from its competitors.

The versatility of our menu enables us to provide customers with dishes that can be enjoyed outside of the traditional lunch and dinner meal periods, as well as to serve our customers’ requirements for a variety of dining occasions, including everyday dining, business lunches, social gatherings and special occasions. We also offer catering, group dining menus, and sushi platters to provide additional opportunities to service our customers. In general, our menu is consistent from location to location. We typically update our menu in the spring and the fall and make enhancements to existing items or introduce new items based on customer feedback, which helps ensure that we are meeting the needs of our customers.

Our restaurants also offer an extensive selection of domestic and imported bottled and draft beers, over 50 selections of wines by the glass or bottle, and an extensive selection of liquors and specialty cocktail drinks. During our weekday happy hour (3 p.m. to 7 p.m.), reverse happy hour (9 p.m. to 11 p.m.) and Sunday happy hour in select markets, we offer discounts on selected food and alcoholic beverage items. Happy hour times may vary by location due to local liquor laws. Alcoholic beverage sales represented approximately 29% of our total restaurant sales during 2016.

Decor and Atmosphere

We design our restaurants to offer customers a unique dining experience in a setting that is relevant for today and tomorrow. Each of our restaurants is individually designed with a contemporary look that is adaptable to varying real estate opportunities while incorporating signature elements such as multiple dining areas and open floor plan. Our customers can expect to find a warm and inviting atmosphere that aligns with our innovative food and drink offerings and high quality service. Our design incorporates exotic veneers, various tiles and textures, vertical beveled stone, raised fabric panels, and fire and water elements. The layout of our restaurants focuses on creating multiple dining areas for our customers while maintaining an open atmosphere that allows customers to have a panoramic view of the entire restaurant and exhibition kitchen and sushi bar. We also utilize a variety of directional lighting styles and custom design elements to add warmth to all dining spaces throughout our restaurants.

Regardless of the experience customers are looking for, our restaurant design offers a variety of dining experiences to fit every mood and occasion. Our indoor/outdoor patio with a full service bar incorporates a high-energy, socially interactive atmosphere for customers to enjoy appetizers or sushi while they wait to dine with us, and serves as a destination for many of our frequent customers during the late afternoon and late night periods. Certain of our locations offer private dining rooms for parties, special occasions and business events. Additionally, three of our restaurants feature a rooftop patio and we enclose patios in colder climates to maximize utilization of the patio throughout the year. Alternatively, our dining room provides a warm and intimate ambience for special occasions or dinner with friends and family. For sushi enthusiasts, we showcase our highly trained sushi chefs creating their masterpieces at our expansive sushi bar.

6

Food Preparation, Quality Control, and Purchasing 

We believe that we have some of the highest food quality standards in the industry. Our standards are designed to protect food products throughout the preparation process. We provide detailed specifications to suppliers for food ingredients, products, and supplies. We strive to maintain quality and consistency in our restaurants through careful hiring, training and supervision of personnel. Our restaurant general managers and executive chefs generally receive nine weeks of training while our other restaurant managers and sous chefs receive seven weeks of training. We require annual recertification training for all employees, and each employee receives extensive training relating to food and beverage preparation and restaurant operations. We also instruct kitchen managers and staff on safety, sanitation, housekeeping, repair and maintenance, product and service specifications, ordering and receiving products, and quality assurance. All of our restaurant managers are compliant with Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point, or HACCP, requirements. We monitor minimum cook temperature requirements and conduct twice-a-day kitchen and food quality inspections to further assure the safety and quality of all of the items we use in our restaurants. We have a ServSafe alcohol certification program, where every front of house employee is trained and tested to ensure we are providing responsible alcohol service. Further, to monitor and ensure compliance with required guidelines, we evaluate all of our employees on their ability to maintain sanitary conditions in their respective restaurants. Restaurants are subjected to six mandatory inspections annually, including two from the local state, county or municipal inspector and four quarterly inspections from an independent third party service provider.

We source all of our products and supplies with reputable and high-quality providers that are capable of providing consistent, reliable distribution to all of our restaurants. We have arrangements with national and local distributors and specialty food suppliers who provide high-quality ingredients and perishable food products. These distributors and suppliers are required to comply with food safety guidelines mandated by HACCP, the Food & Drug Administration and local statutes and regulations of the particular state, county or municipality. Additionally, our corporate food and beverage team performs site visits and periodic inspections of the distribution centers to verify that the conditions of their infrastructure and delivery fleet comply with our operational cleanliness requirements.

Our goal is to maximize purchasing efficiencies and obtain the lowest possible prices for ingredients, products, and supplies, while maintaining the highest quality. We are committed to purchasing high-quality ingredients for our restaurants at reasonable prices. We use only the freshest ingredients and, as a result, we maintain only modest inventories. We believe that competitively priced alternative distribution sources are available should those channels be necessary. Our corporate office coordinates national supply contracts, negotiates prices for food supply throughout all of our restaurants, monitors quality control and consistency of the food supplied to restaurants, and oversees delivery of food on a nationwide basis. In order to provide the freshest ingredients and products, and to maximize operating efficiencies between purchase and usage, we utilize an automated food cost and inventory system to assist each restaurant’s management team in determining daily order requirements for food ingredients, products, and supplies. The management team orders accordingly from approved suppliers, and all deliveries are inspected to assure that the items received meet our quality specifications and negotiated prices.

Restaurant Operations

Executive and Restaurant Management

Our executive management team continually monitors restaurant operations to assure the quality of products and services and the maintenance of facilities. Restaurant management and our corporate office institute procedures to enhance efficiency, reduce costs and provide centralized and individual restaurant support systems. Our corporate operations team and district managers have primary responsibility for oversight of our restaurants and participate in analyzing restaurant-level performance and strategic planning. We currently employ six district managers who are each responsible for overseeing the restaurants in a specific region. The district managers’ responsibilities include supporting the general managers and helping each general manager achieve the sales and cash flow targets for their restaurant as well as providing insight for decision making in such areas as food and beverage, people development, and process improvements to enhance the efficiency of operations and the dining experience for our customers. In addition, our corporate food and beverage team includes a vice president, a corporate chef, a corporate sushi chef and three regional culinary partners who are responsible for educating, coaching, and developing kitchen personnel, implementing process enhancements to improve the efficiency of kitchen operations, and developing new menu offerings.

7

Our typical restaurant management team consists of a general manager, assistant general manager, two front-of-the-house managers, executive chef, sous chef, and head sushi chef. Our restaurants employ on average approximately 75 non-management employees, many of whom work part-time. The general manager is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the restaurant, including the hiring, training, personnel development, execution of local marketing programs, and operating results. The chefs are responsible for overseeing the preparation of kitchen and sushi items, maintaining product quality, and closely monitoring food costs and department labor costs. We also employ a kitchen staff member who is dedicated to the preparation of our signature sauces and dressings.

Training

In order to maintain quality and consistency in each of our restaurants, we carefully train and supervise restaurant personnel and adhere to high standards related to personnel performance, food and beverage preparation, and maintenance of our restaurants. All of our restaurant personnel participate in both initial and ongoing training programs under the direction of our director of training. Each restaurant manager completes a formal training program at one of our certified training restaurants that is comprised of a mix of online and on-the-job instruction. Programs for general managers and executive chefs provide nine weeks of training. Programs for other managers provide seven weeks of training and may involve work in our other restaurants and cross training of various duties. The training covers all aspects of management philosophy and overall restaurant operations, including supervisory skills, operating and performance standards, accounting procedures, IT systems and employee selection and training necessary for top-quality restaurant operations. The training programs also involve intensive understanding and testing of our menu, learning the ingredients of various menu items, and other key service protocols. In addition, our hourly staff goes through a series of in-depth interactive training for their positions.

We implement these programs by hiring dedicated corporate personnel as well as designating high-performing existing restaurant personnel to assist in training. Our training personnel are involved in training for both new employees hired in anticipation of new restaurant openings as well as for ongoing training in existing restaurants. When we open a new restaurant, we provide training to restaurant personnel in every position for several weeks prior to and after the opening to assure the smooth and efficient operation of the restaurant from the first day it opens to the public.

Recruitment and Retention

Our future growth and success is highly dependent upon our ability to attract, develop, and retain qualified individuals who are capable of successfully managing our high-volume, upscale casual restaurants. We believe that our high unit volume, the image and atmosphere of the Kona Grill concept, and career advancement and employee benefit programs enable us to attract high quality management and restaurant personnel. We offer restaurant management personnel competitive wages and benefits, including medical insurance and participation in our 401(k) plan with a company match. We motivate and prepare our restaurant personnel by providing them with opportunities for increased responsibility and advancement through a formal management development program. Furthermore, the management team of each restaurant shares in a bonus tied to the sales and overall profitability of their restaurant. We believe that our compensation package for managers and restaurant employees is comparable to or better than those provided by other upscale casual restaurants. We believe our compensation policies help us attract quality personnel.

8

Information Systems

We believe that our management information systems enable us to increase the speed and accuracy of order-taking and pricing, efficiently schedule labor to better serve customers, monitor labor costs, assist in product purchasing and menu mix management, promptly access financial and operating data, and improve the accuracy and efficiency of restaurant-level information and reporting.

We utilize an integrated information system to manage the flow of information within each of our restaurants and between each restaurant and our corporate office. This system includes a point-of-sale (POS) local area network that helps facilitate the operations of the restaurant by recording sales transactions and printing orders in the appropriate locations within the restaurant. Additionally, we utilize the POS system to authorize, batch, and transmit credit card transactions, record employee time clock information, and produce a variety of management reports. The POS is integrated with food cost and labor scheduling software as well as our accounting system and incorporates a redundancy and back-up emergency operating plan on a temporary basis if the system experiences downtime.

We transmit electronically select information that is captured from the POS system to our corporate office on a daily basis. This information flow enables senior management to monitor operating results with daily and weekly sales analysis, detailed labor and food cost information, and comparisons between actual and budgeted operating results. We anticipate continually updating both our restaurant information systems and corporate office information systems to enhance operations. We believe our information systems are secure and scalable as we continue to build our brand.

Advertising and Marketing 

Our ongoing advertising and marketing strategy consists of loyalty programs, social media, grass-root local marketing, various public relations activities and word-of-mouth recommendations. We believe that these mediums are key components in driving customer trial and usage. We have invested, and expect to continue to invest, in marketing, branding and advertising efforts, primarily to introduce our concept in new markets and to increase comparable restaurant sales and solidify brand awareness in existing markets.

We implement a coordinated public relations effort in conjunction with each new restaurant opening. Approximately 60 days before a scheduled restaurant opening, we collaborate with the local media to publicize our restaurant and generate awareness of our brand. This effort is usually supplemented by targeted marketing campaigns, social media and other marketing efforts, including hosting a high profile event in which we invite local leaders and community members as part of our preopening practice activities to introduce our concept to the local market. In addition, we use our website, www.konagrill.com, to continue promoting our brand awareness.

Competition

The restaurant industry is highly competitive. Key competitive factors in the industry include the taste, quality, and price of food products and drink offerings, quality and speed of customer service, brand name identification, attractiveness of facilities, restaurant location, and overall dining experience.

We believe we compete favorably with respect to each of these factors, as follows:

● We offer a global menu of contemporary American favorites, award-winning sushi items and specialty cocktails;

● We appeal to multiple demographic and psychographic profiles;

● We strive to maintain quality and consistency in each of our restaurants through the careful training and supervision of restaurant personnel and adherence to high standards related to personnel performance, food and beverage preparation, and maintenance of our restaurants;

● Our innovative menu with attractive price points, attentive service, and contemporary restaurant design with multiple environments blend together to create our upscale casual dining experience and enables us to attract a broad customer demographic.

9

Although we believe we compete favorably with respect to each of these factors, there are a substantial number of restaurant operations that compete directly and indirectly with us, many of which have significantly greater financial resources, higher revenue, and greater economies of scale. The restaurant business is often affected by changes in consumer tastes and discretionary spending patterns; national and regional employment statistics; demographic trends; weather conditions; the cost and availability of raw materials, labor, and energy; purchasing power; governmental regulations; and local competitive factors. Any change in these or other related factors or negative publicity relating to food safety could adversely affect our restaurant operations. Accordingly, we must constantly evolve and refine the critical elements of our restaurant concept over time to protect their longer-term competitiveness. Additionally, there is competition for highly qualified restaurant management employees and for attractive locations suitable for upscale, high volume restaurants.

Trademarks

We have registered the service marks “Kona Grill” and “Konavore” with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and “Kona Grill” in certain foreign jurisdictions. We believe that our trademarks and other proprietary rights, such as our distinctive menu offerings and signature sauce recipes, have significant value and are important to the marketing of our concept. We have protected in the past and will continue to vigorously protect our proprietary rights. We cannot predict, however, whether steps taken by us to protect our proprietary rights will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of these rights or the use by others of restaurant features based upon, or otherwise similar to, our concept. It may be difficult for us to prevent others from copying elements of our concept and any litigation to enforce our rights will likely be costly. In addition, other local restaurant companies with names similar to ours may try to prevent us from using our marks in those locales.

Government Regulation

Each of our restaurants is subject to licensing and regulation by state and local departments and bureaus of alcohol control, health, sanitation, zoning, and fire and to periodic review by state and municipal authorities for areas in which the restaurants are located. In addition, we are subject to local land use, zoning, building, planning, and traffic ordinances and regulations in the selection and acquisition of suitable sites for developing new restaurants. Delays in obtaining, or denials of, or revocation or temporary suspension of, necessary licenses or approvals could have a material adverse impact on our restaurant development.

Alcoholic beverage control regulations require each of our restaurants to apply to a state authority and, in certain locations, county and municipal authorities for a license and permit to sell alcoholic beverages on the premises. Typically, licenses must be renewed annually and may be subject to penalties, temporary suspension or revocation for cause at any time. Alcoholic beverage control regulations impact many aspects of the daily operations of our restaurants, including the minimum age of patrons and employees, hours of operation, inventory control and handling, and storage and dispensing of alcoholic beverages. We have not encountered any material problems relating to alcoholic beverage licenses or permits to date. The failure of a restaurant to obtain or retain its liquor license would adversely affect that restaurant’s operations and profitability.

We are subject to “dram shop” statutes in most of the states in which we operate. Those statutes generally provide a person who has been injured by an intoxicated person the right to recover damages from an establishment that wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to such person. We carry liquor liability coverage as part of our existing comprehensive general liability insurance which we believe is consistent with coverage in the full-service restaurant industry. Even though we carry liquor liability insurance, a judgment against us under a “dram shop” statute in excess of our liability coverage could have a material adverse effect on our operations.

10

Our operations are also subject to federal and state laws governing such matters as wages, working conditions, citizenship requirements, and overtime. Several states have set minimum wage rates higher than the current federal level. A significant number of hourly personnel at our restaurants are paid at rates related to state and federal minimum wage laws and, accordingly, state minimum wage increases implemented during the last several years have increased our labor costs. Increases in the minimum wage rate or the cost of workers’ compensation insurance, changes in tip-credit provisions, employee benefit costs (including costs associated with mandated health insurance coverage), or other costs associated with employees could adversely affect our operating results. To our knowledge, we are in compliance in all material respects with applicable federal, state, and local laws affecting our business.

Employees

As of February 24, 2017, we employed 4,066 people of whom 3,996 worked in our restaurants and 70 were employed at our corporate office. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We have never experienced a major work stoppage, strike, or labor dispute. We consider our relations with our employees to be favorable.

Access to Information

Our website is located at www.konagrill.com. The information on our website is not part of this filing. Through our website, we make available free of charge our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. These reports are available as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file these reports with the SEC. We also post on our website the charters of our Audit, Compensation, and Nominating Committees; Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers; Insider Trading Policy and any other corporate governance materials required by SEC or NASDAQ regulations. These documents are also available in print to any stockholder requesting a copy from our corporate secretary at our executive offices.

Item 1A.     Risk Factors

Risks Related to Our Business

Changes in general economic conditions, including economic uncertainty, have adversely impacted our business and results of operations and may continue to do so.

Purchases at our restaurants are discretionary for consumers and we are therefore susceptible to economic slowdowns. We believe that consumers generally are more willing to make discretionary purchases during favorable economic conditions. Economic and political uncertainty, financial market volatility and unpredictability, and the oversupply of restaurants in the U.S can all negatively affect customer traffic and sales throughout our industry. If the economy experiences a downturn or continued uncertainties, our customers may further reduce their level of discretionary spending, impacting the frequency with which they choose to dine out or the amount they spend on meals while dining out.

There is also a risk that if uncertain economic conditions persist for an extended period of time or worsen, consumers might make long-lasting changes to their discretionary spending behavior, including dining out less frequently. The ability of the U.S. economy to handle this uncertainty is likely to be affected by many national and international factors that are beyond our control. These factors, including national, regional and local politics and economic conditions, disposable consumer income and consumer confidence, also affect discretionary consumer spending. Continued uncertainty in or a worsening of the economy, generally or in a number of our markets, and our customers’ reactions to these trends could adversely affect our revenues and cause us to, among other things, reduce the number and frequency of new restaurant openings, close restaurants and delay remodeling of existing locations.

11

Our sales and ability to generate profits could be adversely affected if comparable restaurant sales are less than we expect, and we may not successfully increase comparable restaurant sales or they may decrease.

While future sales growth will depend substantially on opening new restaurants, changes in comparable restaurant sales will also affect our sales growth and will continue to be a critical factor in generating future profits. This is because the profit margin on comparable restaurant sales is generally higher, as comparable restaurant sales increases enable fixed costs to be spread over a higher sales base. Conversely, declines in comparable restaurant sales can have a significant adverse effect on profitability due to the loss of the positive impact on profit margins associated with comparable restaurant sales increases.

Our comparable restaurant sales have increased over the past six years. However, as our units continue in operation, it may be more difficult to continue to achieve significant increases in comparable restaurant sales. Further, the impact of the factors noted below may lower our expectations for comparable restaurant sales:

● changes in consumer preferences and discretionary spending, including weaker consumer spending in periods of economic difficulty or uncertainty;

● consumer understanding and acceptance of the Kona Grill experience and perception of the Kona Grill brand;

● our ability to increase menu prices without adversely impacting customer traffic to such a degree that the impact of the decrease in customers equals or exceeds the benefit of the menu price increase;

● any “trade down” by customers or other reduction in average check per person in response to price increases, which could reduce or eliminate the benefit of the price increase on comparable restaurant sales;

● competition, either from our competitors in the restaurant industry, or from our own restaurants within the same market in the event customers who frequent one of our restaurants begin to visit one of our new restaurants instead;

● executing our strategies effectively, including our development strategy, menu improvement initiatives and marketing and branding strategies, each of which may not have the impact we expect;

● turnover of key operations and restaurant personnel;

● negative publicity relating to food safety or quality;

● weather, road construction and other factors limiting access to our restaurants; and

● changes in government regulation.

As a result, it is possible that we will not achieve our targeted comparable restaurant sales or that the change in comparable restaurant sales could be negative. If this were to happen, sales and profitability would be adversely affected and our stock price would likely decline. Further, many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do to withstand prolonged periods of declines in comparable restaurant sales and regional and national restaurant companies continue to expand their operations into our current and anticipated market areas, thereby increasing competition for market share.

12

We depend upon high levels of consumer traffic at the sites where our restaurants are located and any adverse change in consumer activity could negatively affect our restaurant sales and have required us to record an impairment charge for restaurants performing below expectations, and may result in future impairments.

Our restaurants are primarily located in high-activity areas such as retail centers, shopping malls, and lifestyle centers. We depend on high consumer traffic rates at these centers to attract customers to our restaurants. In general, such visit frequencies are significantly affected by many factors, including national, regional or local economic conditions, anchor tenants closing in retail centers or shopping malls in which we operate, changes in consumer preferences or shopping patterns, changes in demographic and economic patterns in neighborhoods and trade areas where our restaurants are located, higher frequency of online shopping, changes in discretionary consumer spending, changes in gasoline prices, or otherwise. If visitor rates to these centers decline, our unit volumes could decline and adversely affect our results of operations. We recorded long-lived asset impairment charges of $12.5 million, for the year ended December 31, 2016. Such amounts are included in "Asset impairment charge" in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss). (See Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details on the impairment charges). We may be required to record impairment charges in the future if certain restaurants perform below expectations.

Our failure to satisfy financial covenants and/or repayment requirements under our credit facility could harm our financial condition which could materially adversely affect our financial performance.

We have a secured credit facility consisting of a $45 million revolver and a $15 million term loan with a conditional increase feature that could provide for an additional $25 million in available credit (collectively, the “Credit Facility”) The Credit Facility requires us to maintain certain financial covenants. At December 31, 2016, we were in compliance with these covenants. However, any failure to maintain these debt covenants or have sufficient liquidity to repay the then outstanding balance at the expiration of the Credit Facility, or upon violation of the covenants, would materially adversely affect our financial condition and performance. Although we were in compliance with all covenants as of December 31, 2016, there is a high likelihood that we will not be in compliance with the leverage ratio requirement at March 31, 2017.  As a result, we have engaged KeyBank, as lead bank, to enter into an amendment of the Credit Facility by March 31, 2017. We believe it is probable that an amendment will be executed and we will be in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2017. However, in the event that we do not enter into any such amendment as expected by March 31, 2017, we will be in default of our covenants and the lenders have various remedies which could materially adversely affect our financial condition and performance.

Our future growth depends in part on our ability to open new restaurants and operate them profitably, and if we are unable to successfully execute this strategy, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our financial success depends in part on management’s ability to execute our growth strategy. One key element of our growth strategy is opening new restaurants. We opened eight restaurants during 2016 and expect to open three additional restaurants in 2017. Our ability to open new restaurants and operate them profitably is dependent upon a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

● finding quality sites, competing effectively to obtain quality sites and reaching acceptable agreements to lease sites;

● complying with applicable zoning, land use and environmental regulations and obtaining, for an acceptable cost, required permits and approvals;

● having adequate capital for construction and opening costs and efficiently managing the time and resources committed to building and opening each new restaurant;

● timely hiring and training and retaining the skilled management and other employees necessary to meet staffing needs;

● successfully promoting our concept and competing in new markets;

13

● acquiring food and other supplies for new restaurants from local suppliers; and

● addressing unanticipated problems or risks that may arise during the development or opening of a new restaurant or entering a new market.

We have opened and plan to open restaurants in markets in which we have no prior operating experience and in which our brand may not be well-known. These new markets may have different competitive conditions, consumer tastes, and discretionary spending patterns than restaurants in our existing markets. Accordingly, sales at restaurants opening in new markets may take longer to achieve or may not achieve average unit volumes comparable with our existing restaurants.

Additionally, a new restaurant typically experiences a “ramp-up” period of approximately 18 months or more before it achieves our targeted level of performance. This is due to the costs associated with opening a new restaurant, as well as higher operating costs caused by start-up and other temporary inefficiencies associated with opening new restaurants. For example, there are a number of factors which may impact the amount of time and money we commit to the construction and development of new restaurants, including landlord delays, shortages of skilled labor, labor disputes, shortages of materials, delays in obtaining necessary permits, local government regulations and weather interference. Once the restaurant is open, how quickly it achieves a desired level of profitability is impacted by many factors, including the level of market familiarity and acceptance when we enter new markets, as well as the availability of experienced staff and the time required to negotiate reasonable prices for services and other supplies from local suppliers. Our business and profitability may be adversely affected if the “ramp-up” period for a new restaurant lasts longer than we expect.

Our ability to open new restaurants may be adversely affected by delays or problems associated with securing suitable restaurant locations and leases and by other factors, some of which are beyond our control and the timing of which is difficult to forecast accurately.

Due in part to the unique nature of each proposed restaurant location, we cannot predict the timing or ultimate success of our site selection process or our ability to open new restaurants on a timely basis after we have identified sites. We plan to grow organically through unit expansion over the next several years by strategically expanding the Kona Grill concept in both new and existing markets. We plan to open three new restaurants in 2017.

There can be no assurance that our unit growth goal will be realized because our ability to open new restaurants depends upon a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:

● the availability and cost of suitable restaurant locations for development and our ability to compete successfully for those locations;

● difficulty negotiating leases with acceptable terms;

● cash flow generated by our existing restaurants;

● delay or cancellation of new site development by developers and landlords, which may become increasingly common during periods of economic uncertainty;

● difficulty managing construction and development costs of new restaurants at affordable levels, particularly in competitive markets;

● labor shortages or disputes experienced by our landlords or outside contractors;

● unforeseen engineering or environmental problems with the leased premises;

14

● our ability to secure governmental approvals and permits, including liquor licenses, construction permits, and occupancy permits;

● obstacles to hiring and training qualified operating personnel in the local market, especially in highly competitive hiring environment;

● inclement weather, impact of climate change, natural disasters and other calamities; and

● general economic conditions.

Any deterioration in general economic conditions could have a material adverse impact on our landlords or on businesses neighboring our locations, which could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.

Any deterioration in general economic conditions could result in our landlords being unable to obtain financing or remain in good standing under their existing financing arrangements which could result in their failure to satisfy obligations to us under leases, including failures to fund or reimburse agreed-upon tenant improvement allowances. Any such failure could adversely impact our operations. Our restaurants are generally located in retail developments with nationally recognized co-tenants, which help increase overall customer traffic into those retail developments. Some of our co-tenants have or may cease operations in the future or have deferred openings or failed to open in a retail development after committing to do so. These failures may lead to reduced customer traffic and a general deterioration in the surrounding retail centers in which our restaurants are located and may contribute to lower customer traffic at our restaurants. If these retail developments experience high vacancy rates, we could experience decreases in customer traffic. As a result, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our domestic and international growth and planned remodeling of existing restaurants may strain our infrastructure and resources, which could slow our development of new restaurants and adversely affect our ability to manage our existing restaurants.

We plan to continue opening new restaurants and currently expect to open three new restaurants during 2017. Further, we plan to maintain and enhance the quality of our customers’ dining experience through remodeling certain of our existing restaurants. Our continued expansion and planned remodeling along with supporting our international franchise partners with their new restaurant openings will increase demands on our available cash resources, as well as demands on our management team, restaurant management systems and resources, financial controls and information systems. These increased demands may adversely affect our ability to open new restaurants and to manage and when appropriate, remodel our existing restaurants. If we fail to continue to improve our infrastructure or to manage other factors necessary for us to meet our expansion objectives, our growth rate and operating results could be adversely affected.

Due to our limited number of existing restaurants and the significant expenses required to open new restaurants, any decision to either reduce or accelerate the pace of openings may cause our future operating results to fluctuate significantly and affect our comparative financial performance.

Our preopening expenses continue to be significant, and the amount of such expenses incurred in any one year or quarter is dependent on the number of restaurants expected to be opened during that time period. We expect the cash investment cost of our prototype restaurant on average to be approximately $2.6 million, net of landlord tenant improvement allowances averaging between $0.7 million and $1.2 million and excluding approximately $450,000 in cash preopening expenses. Actual costs may vary significantly depending upon a variety of factors, including the site and size of the restaurant and conditions in the local real estate and employment markets.

The combination of our relatively small number of existing restaurants, the significant investment associated with each new restaurant, and the sales volumes of our new restaurants may cause our results of operations to fluctuate significantly. Further, poor operating results at any one restaurant or a delay or cancellation in the planned opening of a restaurant could materially affect the financial performance for a particular period and perception of our company, making the investment risks related to any one location more significant than those associated with larger restaurant companies who have substantially greater financial and other resources. If we decide to reduce our new restaurant openings, our comparable preopening expenses will be lower and the effect on our comparative financial performance should be favorable. Conversely, if the rate at which we develop and open new restaurants is increased to higher levels in the future, the resulting increase in preopening expenses will have an unfavorable short-term impact on our comparative financial performance.

15

We may not be successful in our international franchise initiative or such expansion may adversely affect our financial performance.

We are expanding into international markets, initially in Mexico and the United Arab Emirates where we have executed development agreements. Similar to other brands with an international presence, we are utilizing a franchise model for development outside of the U.S., providing training and operational support to our partners without committing, or putting at risk, capital for restaurant construction in these international markets. It takes time for us to identify franchise partners and negotiate franchise agreements and for our partners to find quality real estate and construct the restaurants. We then need to train the local team on our food and hospitality standards to ensure a successful execution of our strategy.

As we continue to pursue our international market expansion, we may not be fully aware of the significant development efforts involved and barriers to entry into these markets. Accordingly, even though we are attempting to manage the necessary capital investment through the utilization of the franchise model, we may incur more expenses than originally anticipated and our investment may take additional time to come to fruition. Furthermore, there is a risk that we may not be successful in our international business development efforts. In that case, we may not be able to recover all of the investments incurred. Additionally, our attempt to expand internationally could result in significant distraction or diversion of resources from our domestic unit expansion and existing operations in the U.S.

There is no assurance that we will find the proper franchisees and other partners to successfully expand internationally, or that the franchised restaurants in foreign markets will gain market acceptance or be able to operate on a profitable basis. Our international operations are subject to many of the same risks associated with our domestic operations, as well as a number of additional risks. These include, among other things, international economic and political conditions, and differing cultures and consumer preferences.

Our international expansion and global brand development efforts could negatively affect our brand or could result in sanctions or liability for violations of regulations or legal actions.

Our business expansion into international markets could create new risks to our brand and reputation. We believe that we will be able to select high-caliber international operating partners with significant experience; however, there is risk that our brand value or financial results could be harmed by factors outside of our control, including, but not limited to:

● difficulties in achieving the consistency of product quality and service as compared to restaurants we operate in the U.S.;

● changes to our recipes due to cultural differences;

● inability to obtain adequate and reliable supplies of ingredients and products necessary to execute our diverse menu; and

● differences, changes or uncertainties in economic, regulatory, legal, social and political conditions.

Further, as we expand our brand internationally, we will need to comply with regulations and legal requirements, including those related to the protection of our trademarks, trade secrets and other intellectual property - see “Our failure to protect our trademarks, service marks, or trade secrets could negatively affect our competitive position and the value of the Kona Grill brand” below. We will have additional exposure to foreign tax laws and regulations which currently do not affect us. Additionally, we will need to comply with both domestic laws affecting U.S. businesses that operate internationally and foreign laws in the countries in which we expand our restaurants, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, under which we have not had exposure prior to our international expansion. Failure to comply with any such legal requirements could subject us to monetary liabilities and other sanctions. Also, we may become subject to lawsuits or other legal actions resulting from the acts or omissions of our operating partners and, even though we may have taken reasonable steps to protect against such liabilities, including by obtaining contractual indemnifications and insurance coverage, there is no assurance that we will not incur liability that is not covered by such protection, or incur costs and expenses as a result of our operating partners’ conduct even when we are not legally liable. Any of these risks could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

16

Failure to attract, retain and motivate effective leaders and the loss of key personnel could negatively impact our business.

Our future success is highly dependent upon our ability to attract and retain key management and operations personnel. We must be able to attract, retain and motivate a sufficient number of qualified management and operations personnel, including culinary and training personnel, district managers, general managers and executive chefs. Our executive officers provide a vision for our company, execute our business strategy, and maintain consistency in the operating standards of our restaurants. The ability of key management and operations personnel to maintain consistency in the quality and diversity of our menu offerings as well as service and hospitality for our customers is a critical factor in our future success. Any failure to attract, retain, and motivate key personnel may harm our reputation and result in a loss of business.

Adverse weather conditions, impact of climate change and natural disasters could adversely affect our results of operations. Additionally, we may not be able to obtain insurance at reasonable rates for natural disasters and other events which are beyond our control.

Adverse weather conditions can impact customer traffic at our restaurants, cause the temporary underutilization of outdoor patio seating and in more severe cases such as hurricanes, tornadoes and other natural disasters, cause temporary closures, sometimes for prolonged periods, which would negatively impact our restaurant sales. Increasing frequency and unpredictability of adverse weather conditions due to climate change may result in decreased customer traffic. Changes in weather could result in interruptions to the availability of utilities, and shortages or interruption in the supply of food items and other supplies, which could increase our costs and negatively impact our operations.

Additionally, although we insure our restaurants against wind, flood, and other disasters, we may not be able to obtain insurance for these types of events for all of our restaurants at reasonable rates. A devastating natural disaster or other event in the vicinity of one of our restaurants could result in substantial losses and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our failure to protect our trademarks, service marks, or trade secrets could negatively affect our competitive position and the value of the Kona Grill brand.

Our business prospects depend in part on our ability to develop favorable consumer recognition of the Kona Grill name. Although Kona Grill is a federally registered trademark, our trademarks and service marks could be imitated in ways that we cannot prevent. Alternatively, third parties may attempt to cause us to change our name or not operate in a certain geographic region if our name is confusingly similar to their name. In addition, we rely on trade secrets, proprietary know-how, concepts, and recipes. Our methods of protecting this information may not be adequate. Moreover, we may face claims of misappropriation or infringement of third parties’ rights that could interfere with our use of this information. Defending these claims may be costly and, if unsuccessful, may prevent us from continuing to use this proprietary information in the future, and may result in a judgment or monetary damages. Additionally, we do not maintain confidentiality and non-competition agreements with all of our executives, key personnel, or suppliers. If competitors independently develop or otherwise obtain access to our trade secrets, proprietary know-how, or recipes, the appeal of our restaurants could be reduced and our business could be harmed.

17

Furthermore, we have not registered all of our trademarks and service marks throughout the world as doing so may not be feasible because of associated costs or various foreign trademark law prohibitions. Our inability to effectively protect our intellectual property domestically or internationally may result in limiting our ability to globally expand our brand thereby adversely affecting our financial performance.

Our business could be adversely impacted if our information technology and computer systems do not perform properly or if we fail to protect our customers’ or our employees’ information. Additionally, the inappropriate use of social media vehicles could harm our reputation and adversely impact our business.

We rely heavily on information technology to conduct our business, including point-of-sale processing in our restaurants, management of our supply chain, collection of cash, payment of obligations and various other processes and procedures. Our ability to efficiently manage our business depends significantly on the reliability and capacity of these systems. Any material failure, interruption of service, or compromised data security, problems with maintenance, upgrading or transitioning to replacement systems or a breach in security of these systems could cause delays in customer service and reduce efficiency in our operations and could otherwise adversely affect our operations. While we take data security very seriously and expend significant resources to ensure that our information technology operates securely and effectively, any security breaches could result in disruptions to operations or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, and significant capital investments might be required to remediate such security breaches.

Additionally, we rely on search engine marketing and social media platforms to attract and retain customers as part of our marketing efforts. A variety of risks are associated with the use of social media, including the improper disclosure of proprietary information, negative comments about our company, exposure of personally identifiable information, fraud, or outdated information. The inappropriate use of social media vehicles by our customers or employees could increase our costs, lead to litigation or result in negative publicity that could damage our reputation.

A data security breach involving a customer’s or employee’s personal data could have a material adverse effect on our business, could adversely affect our reputation and could result in litigation against us or the imposition of penalties, which could adversely affect our financial performance.

We receive and maintain certain personal information about our customers and employees. For example, we transmit confidential credit card information in connection with credit card transactions, and we are required to collect and maintain certain personal information in connection with our employment practices, including the administration of our benefit plans. The collection and use of this information by us is regulated at the federal and state levels, and the regulatory environment related to information security and privacy is increasingly demanding. In addition, our ability to accept credit cards as payment in our restaurants and for on-line gift card orders depends on us remaining compliant with standards set by the PCI Security Standards Council. If our security and information systems are compromised or our employees or authorized third parties fail to comply with these laws and regulations and this information is obtained by unauthorized persons or used inappropriately, it could adversely affect our reputation and could result in litigation against us or the imposition of penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.

These standards require certain levels of system security and procedures to protect our customers’ credit card and other personal information. We utilize both internal resources and external consultants to reduce the likelihood of any security failures or breaches. However, we can provide no assurance that these security measures will be successful. If these security measures are not successful, we may become subject to litigation against us or the imposition of regulatory penalties, which could result in negative publicity and significantly harm our reputation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance. As privacy and information security laws and regulations change, we may incur additional costs to ensure that we remain in compliance, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.

18

Risks Related to the Restaurant Industry

Changes in food and supply costs could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our profitability depends in part on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in food and supply costs. Like all restaurant companies, we are susceptible to increases in food costs as a result of factors beyond our control, such as general economic conditions, seasonal fluctuations, weather conditions, demand, food safety concerns, product recalls and government regulations. Although we can purchase certain commodities under contract, we currently do not use financial management strategies or have long-term contracts in place for the majority of commodities to reduce our exposure to price fluctuations. Changes in the price or availability of seafood, poultry, beef, grains, dairy or produce could affect our ability to offer a broad menu and price offering to customers and could reduce our operating margins and adversely affect our results of operations. We may not be able to anticipate and react to changing food costs through our purchasing practices and menu price adjustments in the future, and failure to do so could negatively impact our sales and results of operations.

Changes in governmental regulation may adversely affect our ability to maintain our existing and future operations and to open new restaurants.

We are subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act (which governs such matters as minimum wages, overtime and other working conditions), along with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, various family leave mandates and a variety of other laws enacted, or rules and regulations promulgated by federal, state and local governmental authorities that govern these and other employment matters, including tip credits, working conditions, safety standards and immigration status. We expect increases in payroll expenses as a result of federal and state mandated increases in the minimum wage, and although such increases are not expected to be material, we cannot assure you that there will not be material increases in the future. Enactment and enforcement of various federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations on immigration and labor organizations may adversely impact the availability and costs of labor for our restaurants in a particular area or across the United States. Other labor shortages or increased employee turnover could also increase labor costs. In addition, our vendors may be affected by higher minimum wage standards or availability of labor, which may increase the price of goods and services they supply to us.

We offer eligible full-time salaried employees and eligible variable-hour employees the opportunity to enroll in healthcare coverage subsidized by us. We adopted a qualifying plan under the Affordable Care Act for our eligible variable-hour employees, which has increased and is expected to increase our labor costs significantly. However, our employees may or may not choose to participate in our healthcare plans. It is also possible that the recent changes in the healthcare plans we offer could make us less attractive to our current or potential employees. Additionally, implementing the requirements of the Affordable Care Act has imposed additional administrative costs on us, and those costs may increase over time. The costs and other effects of these new healthcare requirements cannot be determined with certainty, but they may have a material adverse effect on our financial and operating results.

We are also subject to laws and regulations, which vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, relating to nutritional content and menu labeling. Compliance with these laws and regulations may lead to increased costs and operational complexity, changes in sales mix and profitability, and increased exposure to governmental investigations or litigation. We cannot reliably anticipate any changes in customer behavior if we alter our recipes to comply with such laws and regulations. This could have adverse effects on our sales or results of operations.

Furthermore, we are subject to federal and state environmental regulations, and although these have not had a material negative effect on our operations, we cannot ensure that there will not be a material negative effect in the future. In particular, the U.S. has increased focus on environmental matters such as climate change, greenhouse gases and water conservation. This increased focus may lead to new initiatives directed at regulating an as yet unspecified array of environmental matters. These efforts could result in increased taxation or in future restrictions on or increases in costs associated with food and other restaurant supplies, transportation costs and utility costs, any of which could decrease our operating profits and/or necessitate future investments in our restaurant facilities and equipment to achieve compliance. Further, more stringent and varied requirements of local and state governmental bodies with respect to zoning, land use and environmental factors could delay, prevent or make cost prohibitive the continuing operations of an existing restaurant or the development of new restaurants in particular locations.

19

The impact of current laws and regulations, the effect of future changes in laws or regulations that impose additional requirements and the consequences of litigation relating to current or future laws and regulations, or our inability to respond effectively to significant regulatory or public policy issues, could increase our compliance and other costs of doing business and therefore have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Failure to comply with the laws and regulatory requirements of federal, state and local authorities could result in, among other things, revocation of required licenses, administrative enforcement actions, fines and civil and criminal liability. Compliance with these laws and regulations can be costly and can increase our exposure to litigation or governmental investigations or proceedings.

Regulations affecting the operation of our restaurants could increase operating costs, restrict our growth, or require us to suspend operations.

Each of our restaurants must obtain licenses from regulatory authorities allowing it to sell liquor, beer, and wine, and each restaurant must obtain a food service license from local health authorities. Each restaurant’s liquor license must be renewed annually and may be revoked or suspended at any time for cause, including violation by us or our employees of any laws and regulations relating to the minimum drinking age, over serving, advertising, wholesale purchasing, and inventory control. Each restaurant is also subject to local health inspections. Failure to pass one or multiple inspections may result in temporary or permanent suspension of operations and could significantly impact our reputation. In certain states, including states where we have existing restaurants or where we may open restaurants in the future, the number of liquor licenses available is limited and licenses are traded at market prices. Liquor, beer, and wine sales comprise a significant portion of our sales, representing 29% of our sales during 2016. Therefore, if we are unable to maintain our existing licenses, or if we choose to open a restaurant in those states, the cost of a new license could be significant. Obtaining and maintaining licenses is an important component of each of our restaurant’s operations, and the failure to obtain or maintain food and liquor licenses and other required licenses, permits, and approvals would adversely impact our restaurants and our growth strategy.

A failure to maintain food safety throughout the supply chain and food-borne illness concerns may have an adverse effect on our business.

Food safety is a top priority, and we dedicate substantial resources to ensuring that our guests enjoy safe, quality food products. However, food safety issues could be caused at the point of source or by food suppliers or distributors and, as a result, may be out of our control. In addition, regardless of the source or cause, any report of food-borne illnesses such as E. coli, hepatitis A, trichinosis or salmonella, and other food safety issues including food tampering or contamination, at one of our restaurants could adversely affect the reputation of our brand and have a negative impact on our sales. Even instances of food-borne illness, food tampering or food contamination occurring solely at restaurants of our competitors could result in negative publicity about the food service industry generally and adversely impact our sales and could result in stricter government regulation, which could increase our costs. The occurrence of food-borne illnesses or food safety issues could also adversely affect the price and availability of affected ingredients, resulting in higher costs and lower margins.

Negative publicity surrounding our restaurants or the consumption of beef, seafood, poultry, or produce generally, or shifts in consumer tastes, could negatively impact the popularity of our restaurants, our sales, and our results of operations.

The popularity of our restaurants in general, and our menu offerings in particular, are key factors to the success of our operations. Negative publicity resulting from poor food quality, illness, injury, or other health concerns, whether related to one of our restaurants or to the beef, seafood, poultry, or produce industries in general (such as negative publicity concerning salmonella, E-coli, hepatitis A, mercury poisoning and other food-borne illnesses), or operating problems related to one or more of our restaurants, could make our brand and menu offerings less appealing to consumers. In addition, other shifts in consumer preferences away from the kinds of food we offer, whether because of dietary or other health concerns or otherwise, would make our restaurants less appealing and adversely affect our sales and results of operations. If our restaurants are unable to compete successfully with other restaurants in new and existing markets, our results of operations will be harmed and we may not achieve profitability.

20

Litigation concerning our food quality, employment practices, liquor liability, and other issues could result in significant expenses to us and could divert resources from our operations.

Like other restaurants, we may receive complaints or litigation from, and potential liability to, our customers involving food-borne illness or injury or other operational issues. We may also be subject to complaints or allegations from, and potential liability to, our former, existing, or prospective employees involving our restaurant employment practices and procedures. In addition, we are subject to state “dram shop” laws and regulations, which generally provide that a person injured by an intoxicated person may seek to recover damages from an establishment that wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to such person. Recent litigation against restaurant chains has resulted in significant judgments, including punitive damages, under “dram shop” statutes. While we carry liquor liability coverage as part of our existing comprehensive general liability insurance, we may still be subject to a judgment in excess of our insurance coverage and we may not be able to obtain or continue to maintain such insurance coverage at reasonable costs, if at all. Regardless of whether any claims against us are valid or whether we are liable, our sales may be adversely affected by publicity resulting from such claims. Such claims may also be expensive to defend and may divert time and money away from our operations and adversely affect our business.

Labor shortages or increases in labor costs could slow our growth or adversely affect our business.

Our success depends in part on our ability to attract, motivate, and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees, including restaurant managers and kitchen managers, necessary to continue our operations. This ability is especially critical to our company because of our relatively small number of existing restaurants. If we are unable to recruit and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees, our business and growth strategy could be adversely affected.

Competition for qualified restaurant employees in current or prospective markets could require us to pay higher wages and benefits, which could result in higher labor costs. In addition, we have a substantial number of hourly employees who are paid rates based upon the federal or state minimum wage and who rely on tips for a significant portion of their income. Government-mandated increases in minimum wages, overtime pay, health and other benefits, or increased tax reporting and tax payment requirements for employees who receive gratuities, or a reduction in the number of states that allow tips to be credited toward minimum wage requirements, could increase our labor costs. We may be unable to generate enough operating efficiencies or increase our menu prices proportionately in order to mitigate these increased costs, in which case our operating margins would be adversely affected.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

The market price for our common stock may be volatile.

Many factors could cause the market price of our common stock to rise and fall, including the following:

● actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly or annual financial results;

● the financial guidance and growth projections we may provide to the public, any changes in such guidance and projections, or our failure to meet such guidance and projections;

● the failure of industry or securities analysts to maintain coverage of our company, changes in financial estimates by any industry or securities analysts that follow our company, or our failure to meet such estimates;

● changes in the market valuations of other companies in the restaurant industry;

21

● actual or anticipated variations in comparable restaurant sales or operating results; whether in our operations or those of our competitors;

● changes in consumer preferences or spending;

● various market factors or perceived market factors, including rumors, whether or not correct, involving us, our customers, our strategic partners, or our competitors;

● sales, or anticipated sales, of large blocks of our stock, including short selling by investors;

● additions or departures of key personnel;

● regulatory or political developments;

● litigation and governmental or regulatory investigations;

● acquisitions or strategic alliances by us or by our competitors; and

● general economic, political, and financial market conditions or events.

Due to the volatility of our stock price, we also may become the target of securities litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources from the business as well as depress the price of our common stock.

Our current principal stockholders own a large percentage of our voting stock, which allows them to control substantially all matters requiring stockholder approval.

Two of our independent directors and our chief executive officer together currently own approximately 25% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, these investors may have significant influence over a decision to enter into any corporate transaction and may have the ability to prevent any transaction that requires the approval of stockholders, regardless of whether or not our other stockholders believe that such transaction is in their own best interests. Such concentration of voting power could have the effect of delaying, deterring, or preventing a change of control or other business combination, which could in turn have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock or prevent our stockholders from realizing a premium over the then-prevailing market price for their shares of common stock.

The large number of shares eligible for public sale could depress the market price of our common stock.

The market price for our common stock could decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares of our common stock in the market, and the perception that these sales could occur may depress the market price. As of December 31, 2016, we had outstanding 10,452,030shares of common stock, all of which shares are either freely tradable or otherwise eligible for sale under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933. In addition, we have 1,753,068 shares available for issuance under our stock award and employee stock purchase plans. We have filed registration statements under the securities laws to register the common stock to be issued under these plans. As a result, shares issued under these plans will be freely tradable without restriction unless acquired by affiliates of our company, who will be subject to the volume and other limitations of Rule 144.

We may not continue to buy back shares of common stock under our stock repurchase program, which could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

We completed the $10 million stock repurchase program in June 2016 with the purchase and retirement of 832,937 shares under an authorization by our Board of Directors in November 2015. We completed an additional $5 million stock repurchase program in February 2017 with the purchase and retirement of 532,376 shares under an authorization by our Board of Directors in October 2016. Any further stock purchase authorizations, and the timing and number of shares purchased under such authorizations, are subject to a number of factors, including current market conditions, legal constraints and available cash. If we do not continue to repurchase shares of our common stock, this could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

22

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws, and Delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, discourage a takeover, and adversely affect existing stockholders.

Our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws, and the Delaware General Corporation Law contain provisions that may have the effect of making more difficult, delaying, or deterring attempts by others to obtain control of our company, even when these attempts may be viewed to be in the best interests of stockholders. These include provisions on our maintaining a classified Board of Directors and limiting the stockholders’ powers to remove directors or take action by written consent instead of at a stockholders’ meeting. Delaware law also imposes conditions on the voting of “control shares” and on certain business combination transactions with “interested stockholders.” In addition, our certificate of incorporation authorizes our Board of Directors, without stockholder approval, to issue one or more series of preferred stock, which could have voting and conversion rights that adversely affect or dilute the voting power of the holders of common stock. These provisions may also limit the ability of stockholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best interests.

We have a stockholder rights plan (known as a “poison pill”) which could affect our common stock price and make it more difficult for a potential acquirer to purchase a large portion of our securities, to initiate a tender offer or a proxy contest, or to acquire us.

In September 2016, our Board of Directors adopted a Stockholder Rights Plan, commonly known as a “poison pill,” with a term through September 2019. This poison pill may discourage, delay or prevent a third party from acquiring a large portion of our securities, initiating a tender offer or proxy contest, or acquiring us through an acquisition, merger or similar transaction even if our stockholders might receive a premium for their stock over the then-current market price in the event of such transaction.

Since we do not expect to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future, holders of our common stock may be forced to sell their stock in order to obtain a return on their investment.

We do not anticipate that we will pay any dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. Instead, we plan to reinvest any earnings to finance our restaurant operations and growth plans, or for a stock repurchase program. Accordingly, stockholders must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any return on their investment. As a result, investors seeking cash dividends may not purchase our common stock.

If we are unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, the accuracy and timeliness of our financial reporting may be adversely affected.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we are required to furnish a report on our internal control over financial reporting. The report contains, among other matters, an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of our fiscal year, including a statement as to whether or not our internal control over financial reporting is effective. This assessment must include disclosure of any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting identified by management.

While we have determined that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016, as indicated in our Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we must continue to monitor and assess our internal control over financial reporting. If our management identifies one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and such weakness remains uncorrected at fiscal year-end, we will be unable to assert such internal control is effective at fiscal year-end. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective at fiscal year-end (or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal controls or concludes that we have a material weakness in our internal controls), we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and the price of our common stock.

23

Item 1B.   Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 2.     Properties

We currently operate 45 restaurants in 23 states and Puerto Rico. Each of our restaurants and our corporate office are located in a leased facility. As of December 31, 2016, our restaurant leases had expiration dates ranging from 2017 to 2029, typically with options to renew for at least a five-year period.The average interior square footage of our restaurants is approximately 7,300 square feet. Many of our restaurants also have outdoor patios that are utilized when weather conditions permit. The following table sets forth our current restaurant locations and corporate office.

State	City	Location	Year Opened
Arizona	Scottsdale	Scottsdale Fashion Square	1998
Arizona	Chandler	Chandler Fashion Center	2001
Missouri	Kansas City	Country Club Plaza	2002
Nevada	Las Vegas	Boca Park Fashion Village	2003
Colorado	Denver	Cherry Creek Mall	2004
Nebraska	Omaha	Village Pointe	2004
Indiana	Carmel	Clay Terrace	2004
Texas	San Antonio	The Shops at La Cantera	2005
Texas	Dallas	North Park Mall	2006
Illinois	Lincolnshire	Lincolnshire Commons	2006
Texas	Houston	Houston Galleria	2006
Illinois	Oak Brook	Oak Brook Promenade	2006
Texas	Austin	The Domain	2007
Michigan	Troy	Big Beaver Road	2007
Connecticut	Stamford	Stamford Town Center	2007
Louisiana	Baton Rouge	Perkins Rowe	2007
Arizona	Gilbert	San Tan Village	2008
Arizona	Phoenix	City North	2008
Virginia	Richmond	West Broad Village	2009
New Jersey	Woodbridge	Woodbridge Conference Center	2009
Minnesota	Eden Prairie	Windsor Plaza	2009
Florida	Tampa	MetWest International	2009
Maryland	Baltimore	Downtown Baltimore	2010
Idaho	Boise	The Village at Meridian	2013
Texas	The Woodlands	The Woodlands Town Center	2013
Texas	Fort Worth	West 7th	2014
Texas	El Paso	Fountains at Farah	2014
Florida	Sarasota	University Town Center	2014
Georgia	Alpharetta	Avalon	2014
Ohio	Columbus	Easton Town Center	2014
Puerto Rico	San Juan	Mall of San Juan	2015
Texas	Plano	West Plano Village	2015
Virginia	Arlington	Rosslyn-Ballston Corridor	2015
Florida	Miami	Dolphin Mall	2015
Ohio	Cincinnati	Liberty Center	2015
Nevada	Las Vegas	Fashion Show Mall	2015
Texas	Friendswood	Baybrook Mall	2015
Alabama	Huntsville	Bridge Street Town Centre	2016
Hawaii	Honolulu	International Market Place	2016
Tennessee	Franklin	CoolSprings Galleria	2016
Virginia	Fairfax	Fair Oaks Mall	2016
Minnesota	Minnetonka	Ridgedale Center	2016
California	Irvine	Irvine Spectrum Center	2016
Florida	Winter Park	Lakeside Crossing	2016
Texas	San Antonio	North Star Mall	2016
Arizona	Scottsdale	Corporate Office at Scottsdale Fashion Square	2004

24

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part IV of this report for a summary of legal proceedings.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our common stock has traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol KONA since our initial public offering on August 16, 2005. The following table sets forth high and low sale prices of our common stock for each calendar quarter indicated as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market.

	High		Low
2016
First quarter	$	16.71	$	12.09
Second quarter	$	14.08	$	10.34
Third quarter	$	14.09	$	9.99
Fourth quarter	$	13.50	$	10.05
2015
First quarter	$	28.42	$	22.26
Second quarter	$	27.66	$	18.50
Third quarter	$	21.23	$	15.75
Fourth quarter	$	17.58	$	12.32

On February 24, 2017, the closing sale price of our common stock was $7.90 per share. On February 28, 2017, there were 16 holders of record of our common stock.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Dividend Policy

We have not paid any dividends to holders of our common stock since our initial public offering and do not anticipate that we will pay any dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future, but instead we currently plan to retain any earnings to finance our restaurant operations and the growth of our business. Payments of any cash dividends in the future, however, is within the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, and capital and legal requirements as well as other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.

25

Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities

In November 2015, our Board of Directors authorized a repurchase program of up to $10 million of our outstanding common stock. We completed the $10 million stock repurchase program in June 2016 with the purchase and retirement of 832,937 shares under the 2015 authorization.

In October 2016, our Board of Directors authorized an additional stock repurchase of up to $5.0 million of outstanding common stock. We completed the $5 million stock repurchase program in February 2017 with the purchase and retirement of 532,376 shares.

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan
November 2016		136,790	$	10.42		136,790	$	3,573,000
Total		136,790	$	10.42		136,790

26

PRICE PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following line graph compares cumulative total stockholder returns for the period from December 31, 2011 through December 31, 2016 for (1) our common stock; (2) the NASDAQ Composite (U.S.) Index; (3) the old peer group; and (4) the new peer group. The calculations of cumulative stockholder return for the NASDAQ Composite (U.S.) Index and the peer group include reinvestment of dividends, if any. Our old peer group consists of BJ’s Restaurants, Inc.; Bravo Brio Restaurant Group, Inc.; Granite City Food & Brewery Ltd.; and The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated. The new peer group includes the addition of J. Alexander's Holdings, Inc. Our peer group companies all compete in the upscale casual segment of the restaurant industry.

The performance shown is not necessarily indicative of future performance. This graph is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

27

Item 6.     Selected Financial Data

The following selected consolidated financial data has been derived from audited financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

		Year Ended December 31,
		2016			2015			2014		2013			2012
		(In thousands, except per share data)
Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) Data:
Restaurant sales	$	169,523		$	143,023		$	119,097	$	98,250		$	96,021
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales		45,314			38,803			32,964		26,853			26,246
Labor		62,027			50,187			40,336		33,166			31,968
Occupancy		13,754			10,528			8,061		6,702			6,253
Restaurant operating expenses		24,740			20,293			16,358		13,456			13,534
General and administrative		13,272			12,612			10,715		7,854			7,037
Preopening expense		4,533			4,746			2,481		1,162			—
Depreciation and amortization		14,421			9,966			7,220		5,918			5,749
Asset impairment charge		12,454			—			—		—			—
Other		—			161			—		32			(120	)
Total costs and expenses		190,515			147,296			118,135		95,143			90,667
Income (loss) from operations		(20,992	)		(4,273	)		962		3,107			5,354
Write off of deferred financing costs		—			—			39		66			—
Interest expense, net		571			180			220		160			66
Income (loss) before income taxes		(21,563	)		(4,453	)		703		2,881			5,288
Income tax expense		66			43			—		169			36
Income (loss) from continuing operations		(21,629	)		(4,496	)		703		2,712			5,252
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes (1)		—			—			—		—			466
Net income (loss)	$	(21,629	)	$	(4,496	)	$	703	$	2,712		$	4,786
Net income (loss) per share — Basic:
Continuing operations	$	(2.00	)	$	(0.40	)	$	0.07	$	0.32		$	0.60
Discontinued operations		—			—			—		—			(0.05	)
Net income (loss)	$	(2.00	)	$	(0.40	)	$	0.07	$	0.32		$	0.55
Net income (loss) per share — Diluted:
Continuing operations	$	(2.00	)	$	(0.40	)	$	0.07	$	0.31		$	0.59
Discontinued operations		—			—			—		—			(0.05	)
Net income (loss)	$	(2.00	)	$	(0.40	)	$	0.07	$	0.31		$	0.54
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		10,791			11 264			9,870		8,573			8,726
Diluted		10 791			11 264			10,263		8,762			8,868
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,476		$	9,055		$	36,578	$	5,881		$	7,989
Investments		178			178			178		177			177
Working capital (deficit)		(10,545	)		(5,466	)		27,018		(6,476	)		1,044
Total assets		108,383			101,844			94,370		49,868			39,325
Total debt		26,633			—			—		3,500			370
Total stockholders’ equity		31,575			62,691			65,426		22,358			18,868

_________________________

⁽¹⁾ As a result of our decision to close two restaurants during 2011, the results of operations for these restaurants, including asset impairment, lease termination, and restaurant-level closing costs, are classified as discontinued operations for the applicable periods presented.

28

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated as a result of a variety of factors, including those set forth under Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report.

Overview

We currently own and operate 45 restaurants located in 23 states and Puerto Rico. Over the past three years, we have grown organically through opening new restaurants. We achieved a unit growth rate of 22% for 2016, with eight openings during the year and 23% unit growth in 2015 with seven restaurant openings. We plan to open three restaurants during 2017, which is below our previous targeted growth rate of 20%. We believe that a more modest growth rate will provide us the flexibility to allocate capital resources, increase our earnings and strengthen our balance sheet as well as to focus our time and attention on new restaurant operations and performance.

We continue to execute our strategy for international market expansion. Given the strength our concept has enjoyed thus far in the U.S. and the increased demand for upscale casual dining concepts overseas, we believe there is a significant opportunity to expand our concept in Latin America, the Middle East and beyond. In February 2016, we announced an agreement for the development of six Kona Grill restaurants in Mexico and in April 2016, we signed an agreement for the development of six Kona Grill restaurants in the United Arab Emirates. We expect each of our international franchise partners to open a Kona Grill restaurant in their respective country during 2017.

We continue to focus on growing sales and successfully opening new restaurants. Our same-store sales increased 0.5% year over year, with 2.4% growth in check average partially offsetting a 1.9% decrease in customer traffic. We have generated positive same-store sales in each of the past six years.

Our restaurant operating profit, defined as restaurant sales minus cost of sales, labor, occupancy, and restaurant operating expenses, increased to $23.7 million or 2.0% from $23.2 million in 2015. Restaurant operating profit as a percentage of restaurant sales of 14.0% in 2016 included new restaurant operating inefficiencies for 12 locations that opened since October 2015. Restaurant operating profit as a percentage of restaurant sales of 16.2% in 2015 included new restaurant operating inefficiencies for 10 locations opened since October 2014. See “Key Measures” and “Financial Performance Overview” below for further information on restaurant operating profit and Adjusted EBITDA, including a reconciliation to income (loss) from operations.

Our cost of sales, labor, and other operating expenses for our restaurants open at least 12 months generally trend consistently with restaurant sales, and we analyze those costs as a percentage of restaurant sales. Our typical new restaurants experience gradually increasing unit volumes as customers discover our concept and we generate market awareness. We anticipate that our new restaurants will take up to twelve months to achieve the majority of operating efficiencies as a result of challenges typically associated with opening and operating new restaurants, including lack of market recognition and the need to hire and sufficiently train employees, as well as other factors. We expect cost of sales and labor expenses as a percentage of restaurant sales to be higher when we open a new restaurant, but to decrease as a percentage of restaurant sales as the restaurant matures and as the restaurant management and employees become more efficient in operating that unit. Occupancy and a portion of restaurant operating expenses are fixed. As a result, the volume and timing of newly opened restaurants has had, and is expected to continue to have, an impact on cost of sales, labor, occupancy, and restaurant operating expenses measured as a percentage of restaurant sales which we expect will continue until these restaurants mature.

29

Key Measures We Use to Evaluate Our Company

Key measures we use to evaluate and assess our business include the following:

Number of Restaurant Openings. Number of restaurant openings reflects the number of restaurants opened during a particular reporting period.

Same-Store Sales Percentage Change. Same-store sales percentage change reflects the periodic change in restaurant sales for the comparable restaurant base. In calculating the percentage change in same-store sales, we include a restaurant in the comparable restaurant base after it has been in operation for more than 18 months. We adjust the sales included in the same-store sales calculation for restaurant closures, primarily as a result of remodels, so that the periods will be comparable. Same-store sales growth can be generated by an increase in customer traffic counts or by increases in the per person average check amount. Menu price changes and the mix of menu items sold can affect the per person average check amount.

Operating Weeks. Operating weeks represent the number of weeks that our restaurants were open during the reporting period.

Sales per Square Foot. Sales per square foot is a measure of a restaurant’s productivity and represents the amount of sales generated for each square foot.

Average Unit Volume. Average unit volume represents the average restaurant sales for the comparable restaurant base.

Restaurant Operating Profit. Restaurant operating profit is defined as restaurant sales minus cost of sales, labor, occupancy, and restaurant operating expenses. Restaurant operating profit does not include general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, or preopening expenses. We believe restaurant operating profit is an important component of financial results because it is a widely used metric within the restaurant industry to evaluate restaurant-level productivity, efficiency, and performance prior to application of corporate overhead. We use restaurant operating profit as a percentage of restaurant sales as a key metric to evaluate our restaurants’ financial performance compared with our competitors. This measure provides useful information regarding our financial condition and results of operations and allows investors to better determine future financial results driven by growth and to compare restaurant level profitability.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) plus the sum of interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA plus preopening expense, asset impairment charge, stock-based compensation, and unusual or non-recurring items. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are presented because: (i) we believe it is a useful measure for investors to assess the operating performance of our business without the effect of non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization expenses and stock-based compensation as well as the costs of opening new restaurants; (ii) we believe that investors will find these measures useful in assessing our ability to service or incur indebtedness; and (iii) we use EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA internally as a benchmark to evaluate our operating performance and compare our performance to that of our competitors.

Key Financial Definitions

Restaurant Sales. Restaurant sales include gross food and beverage sales, net of promotions and discounts.

Cost of Sales. Cost of sales consists of food and beverage costs and related delivery fees.

Labor. Labor includes all direct and indirect labor costs incurred in operations.

30

Occupancy. Occupancy includes all rent payments associated with the leasing of real estate, including base, percentage and straight-line rent, real estate taxes, and common area maintenance expense. We record tenant improvement allowances as a reduction of occupancy expense over the term of the lease.

Restaurant Operating Expenses. Restaurant operating expenses consist of all other restaurant-level operating costs, the major components of which are utilities, credit card fees, advertising, supplies, marketing, repair and maintenance, and other expenses. Other operating expenses contain both variable and fixed components.

General and Administrative. General and administrative includes all corporate and administrative functions that support operations and provide infrastructure to facilitate our future growth. Components of this category include management and staff salaries, bonuses, stock-based compensation and related employee benefits, travel, information systems, corporate rent, professional and consulting fees, and corporate insurance costs.

Preopening Expense. Preopening expense consists of costs incurred prior to opening a new restaurant and is comprised principally of manager salaries, payroll and related training costs for new employees, including food and beverage costs associated with practice and rehearsal of service activities, and rent expense incurred from the date we obtain possession of the property until opening. We expense restaurant preopening expenses as incurred. We expect preopening expenses to commence six to eight months prior to a restaurant opening. Although the actual preopening expenses for a particular location depend upon numerous factors, our historical cash preopening expenses average approximately $450,000 per location, and non-cash preopening rent expense typically ranges from $50,000 to $100,000 per location. Our preopening costs will fluctuate from period to period depending upon the number of restaurants opened, the timing of new restaurant openings, the location of the restaurants, and the complexity of the staff hiring and training process.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense consists of the depreciation of property and equipment. Depreciation and amortization expense also includes gains or losses on the disposal of fixed assets, primarily associated with remodel activities.

Interest Expense, net. Interest expense consists of the cost of servicing our debt obligations, the amortization of debt issuance costs and commitment fees on the line of credit. Interest expense is offset by interest earned on cash and investment balances. We capitalize interest incurred on borrowings for restaurant construction.

Income Tax Expense. Expense for income taxes represents amounts due for federal and state income taxes.

Financial Performance Overview

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our financial performance for 2016, 2015 and 2014:

		Year Ended December 31,
		2016			2015			2014
Restaurant sales growth		18.5	%		20.1	%		21.2	%
Same-store sales percentage change		0.5	%		2.0	%		3.8	%
Average unit volume (in thousands)	$	4,531		$	4,506		$	4,433
Sales per square foot	$	630		$	625		$	627
Restaurant operating profit (in thousands)	$	23,688		$	23,212		$	21,378
Restaurant operating profit as a percentage of sales		14.0	%		16.2	%		18.0	%
EBITDA (in thousands)	$	(6,571	)	$	5,693		$	8,143
EBITDA as a percentage of sales		(3.9	)%		4.0	%		6.8	%
Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands)	$	11,678		$	11,963		$	11,519
Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of sales		6.9	%		8.4	%		9.7	%

31

The table below sets forth our reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and restaurant operating profit to the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
	(In thousands)
Net income (loss)	$	(21,629	)	$	(4,496	)	$	703
Income tax expense (benefit)		66			43			—
Interest expense, net		571			180			220
Depreciation and amortization		14,421			9,966			7,220
EBITDA	$	(6,571	)	$	5,693		$	8,143
Preopening expense		4,533			4,746			2,481
Asset impairment charge		12,454			—			—
Stock-based compensation		1,262			1,363			856
Other		—			161			—
Write-off of deferred financing costs		—			—			39
Adjusted EBITDA		11,678			11,963			11,519
General and administrative		13,272			12,612			10,715
Stock-based compensation		(1,262	)		(1,363	)		(856	)
Restaurant operating profit	$	23,688		$	23,212		$	21,378

	Percent of Restaurant Sales
	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Net income (loss)		(12.8	)%		(3.1	)%		0.6	%
Income tax expense (benefit)		0.0			0.0			—
Interest expense, net		0.3			0.1			0.2
Depreciation and amortization		8.5			7.0			6.0
EBITDA		(3.9	)		4.0			6.8
Preopening expense		2.7			3.3			2.1
Asset impairment charge		7.3			—			—
Stock-based compensation		0.7			1.0			0.7
Other		—			0.1			—
Write-off of deferred financing costs		—			—			0.0
Adjusted EBITDA		6.9			8.4			9.7
General and administrative		7.8			8.8			9.0
Stock-based compensation		(0.7	)		(1.0	)		(0.7	)
Restaurant operating profit		14.0	%		16.2	%		18.0	%

Certain percentage amounts may not sum to total due to rounding.

Store Growth Activity

	2016		2015		2014
Number of Restaurants at Beginning of Year		37		30		25
Openings		8		7		5
Total		45		37		30

32

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the years indicated, our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) expressed as a percentage of restaurant sales.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2015		2014
Restaurant sales	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales	26.7		27.1		27.7
Labor	36.6		35.1		33.9
Occupancy	8.1		7.4		6.8
Restaurant operating expenses	14.6		14.2		13.7
General and administrative	7.8		8.8		9.0
Preopening expense	2.7		3.3		2.1
Depreciation and amortization	8.5		7.0		6.1
Asset impairment charge	7.3		—		—
Other	—		0.1		—
Total costs and expenses	112.4		103.0		99.2
Income (loss) from operations	(12.4	)	(3.0	)	0.8
Write off of deferred financing costs	—		—		0.0
Interest expense, net	0.3		0.1		0.2
Income (loss) before income taxes	(12.7	)	(3.1	)	0.6
Income tax expense	—		—		—
Net income (loss)	(12.8	)%	(3.1	)%	0.6	%

Certain percentage amounts may not sum to the total due to rounding.

Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2015

Restaurant Sales. Restaurant sales increased 18.5% to $169.5 million during 2016 from $143.0 million in 2015, primarily due to a 24% increase in the number of operating weeks and same-store sales growth of 0.5% year over year. The increase is primarily due to restaurant sales generated by eight restaurants opened during 2016 and a full year of sales for seven restaurants that opened during 2015.

Cost of Sales. Cost of sales increased $6.5 million, or 16.8% to $45.3 million in 2016 compared to $38.8 million in 2015, with the increase primarily attributable to our new locations opened since the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2015. As a percentage of restaurant sales, cost of sales was 26.7% compared to 27.1% in the prior year, primarily reflecting improved kitchen efficiencies and favorable commodity pricing for poultry, produce and dairy products compared to 2015.

Labor. Labor expense for our restaurants increased to $62.0 million from $50.2 million in 2015, an increase of 23.6%, primarily due to the twelve new restaurants opened since the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2015. Labor expenses as a percentage of restaurant sales increased to 36.6% compared to 35.1% in the prior year, reflecting labor inefficiencies from our newly opened locations, increased wage costs due to certain state or local mandated minimum wage increases and a competitive labor market, and higher benefit costs. We expect labor cost as a percentage of sales to typically trend higher upon opening and gradually improve as our new restaurant management and employees become more efficient in operating their restaurants.

Occupancy. Occupancy expenses increased $3.2 million or 30.6% to $13.8 million year over year, primarily associated with base rent and common area maintenance charges for twelve new locations opened since the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2015. Occupancy expenses as a percentage of restaurant sales were 8.1% in 2016 compared to 7.4% in 2015.

33

Restaurant Operating Expenses. Restaurant operating expenses increased $4.4 million, or 21.9%, to $24.7 million in 2016, primarily due to the additional operating expenses for twelve new restaurants opened since the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2015. Restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of restaurant sales were 14.6% and 14.2% in 2016 and 2015, respectively. The year over year increase was driven in part by higher repair and maintenance costs, marketing expenses, professional services and training-related travel costs.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased in absolute dollars by $0.7 million, or 5.2% to $13.3 million from $12.6 million year over year; however, these expenses decreased as a percentage of sales to 7.8% in 2016 compared to 8.8% in the prior year. Increased payroll, benefit costs and recruiting fees associated with additional headcount to support our unit growth expansion, higher audit fees and increased legal and professional fees contributed to the year over year increase in absolute dollars, partially offset by lower incentive compensation.

Preopening Expense. Preopening expense was $4.5 million in 2016 compared to $4.7 million in 2015, including non-cash rent of $1.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Preopening expense in 2016 related to our Irvine, Fairfax, and Minnetonka restaurants opened in the second quarter of 2016, the Nashville, and Waikiki restaurants opened in the third quarter of 2016, and the Huntsville, Winter Park, and San Antonio locations opened in the fourth quarter of 2016, in addition to non-cash rent for two openings scheduled for the first half of 2017. Preopening expense in 2015 related to our San Juan restaurant opened in the first quarter of 2015, the Plano and Arlington restaurants opened in the second quarter of 2015, the Miami, Cincinnati, Las Vegas and Friendswood locations opened in the fourth quarter of 2015 and preparations for openings in the first half of 2016.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $4.4 million or 44.7% to $14.4 million year over year, primarily attributable to the incremental depreciation expense for eight restaurants opened during 2016 and a full year of depreciation expense for seven restaurants that opened during 2015 as well as depreciation expense associated with the Boca Park and Kansas City remodels. Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of restaurant sales was 8.5% and 7.0% of restaurant sales in 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Asset Impairment Charge. During 2016, we recorded a non-cash asset impairment charge of $12.5 million related to the write-down of certain long-lived assets associated with five underperforming restaurants. The asset impairment charges were based upon an assessment of each restaurant’s historical operating performance combined with expected cash flows for that restaurants over the respective remaining lease term. We have no plans to close any of these restaurants; however, we will continue to evaluate each of these restaurants to determine whether operating performance can be improved.

Other Expenses. Other expenses of $0.2 million in 2015 primarily related to an expected settlement of a state use tax audit.

Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense increased to $0.6 million year-over-year due to borrowings under the credit facility. We used the majority of the borrowings to fund new restaurant construction and remodel activities in 2016. We did not borrow from the credit facility during 2015.

Income Tax Expense. We recorded income tax expense of $66,000 and $43,000 for 2016 and 2015, respectively. Income tax expense for 2016 and 2015 relate to state income tax expense for which no net operating loss carryforwards or other credits exist partially offset by refunds primarily associated with previous year state income tax. We did not recognize any federal income tax benefit in 2016 or 2015 due to projected net operating loss carryforwards expected to be generated from tax planning strategies and available credits to offset taxable income.

34

Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2014

Restaurant Sales. Restaurant sales increased $23.9 million or 20.1% in 2015, primarily attributable to a 19.4% increase in the number of operating weeks. Our same-store sales increased 2.0% year over year, with a 2.6% growth in average check resulting from a 1.5% menu price increase in April 2015 and a shift in menu mix partially offset by a 0.6% decrease in customer traffic. The 2.0% same-store sales growth in 2015 compares to a 3.8% increase in same-store sales in 2014.

Cost of Sales. Cost of sales increased $5.8 million, or 17.7% to $38.8 million in 2015 compared to $33.0 million in 2014, with the increase primarily attributable to our new locations opened since the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2014. As a percentage of restaurant sales, cost of sales was 27.1% compared to 27.7% in the prior year, primarily reflecting improved kitchen efficiencies for both our comparable and non-comparable restaurants and favorable commodity pricing on chicken, pork and shrimp compared to 2014.

Labor. Labor expense for our restaurants increased to $50.2 million, or 24.4%, from $40.3 million in 2014 primarily attributable to the nine new restaurants opened since the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2014. Labor expenses as a percentage of restaurant sales increased to 35.1% compared to 33.9% in the prior year, reflecting labor inefficiencies from our newly opened locations, increased overtime hours associated with staffing shortages from a tight labor market and higher benefit costs. We expect labor cost as a percentage of sales to typically trend higher upon opening and gradually improve as our new restaurant management and employees become more efficient in operating their restaurants.

Occupancy. Occupancy expenses increased $2.5 million or 30.6% to $10.5 million year over year, primarily associated with base rent and common area maintenance charges for new locations opened since the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2014. Occupancy expenses as a percentage of restaurant sales were 7.4% in 2015 compared to 6.8% in 2014.

Restaurant Operating Expenses. Restaurant operating expenses increased $3.9 million, or 24.1%, to $20.3 million in 2015, primarily due to the additional operating expenses for the new restaurants opened since the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2014. Restaurant operating expenses as a percentage of restaurant sales were 14.2% and 13.7% in 2015 and 2014, respectively. The year over year increase was driven by higher utilities, marketing expenses, professional services and training-related travel costs.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses were $12.6 million and $10.7 million, or 8.8% and 9.0% as a percentage of sales, in 2015 and 2014, respectively. The increase in absolute dollars reflects human capital investment and additional travel costs to support our unit growth expansion and start-up efforts for our international business development, as well as higher stock-based compensation expense.

Preopening Expense. Preopening expense was $4.7 million in 2015 compared to $2.5 million in 2014, including non-cash rent of $1.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Preopening expense in 2015 related to our San Juan restaurant opened in the first quarter of 2015, the Plano and Arlington restaurants opened in the second quarter of 2015, the Miami, Cincinnati, Las Vegas and Friendswood locations opened in the fourth quarter of 2015 and preparations for openings in the first half of 2016. Preopening expense in 2014 related to the Fort Worth restaurant opened in the first quarter of 2014, the El Paso location opened in the second quarter of 2014, the Alpharetta, Sarasota and Columbus restaurants opened in the fourth quarter of 2014 and expenses for restaurants scheduled to open in the first half of 2015.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.7 million or 38.0% to $10.0 million year over year, primarily attributable to new restaurants opened since the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2014, accelerated depreciation expense associated with the remodel of our Denver restaurant and disposal losses associated with the replacement of a portion of our smallwares and remodel activities. Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of restaurant sales was 7.0% and 6.1% of restaurant sales in 2015 and 2014, respectively.

35

Other Expenses. Other expenses of $0.2 million in 2015 primarily related to an expected settlement of a state use tax audit.

Interest Expense, Net. Net interest expense is attributable to the amortization of deferred loan fees, the commitment fees associated with our credit facility and interest incurred on borrowings under the credit facility partially offset by interest income earned from cash and investment balances. We paid off all outstanding borrowings under the credit facility in June 2014. Interest expense also decreased due to lower deferred loan fee amortization year over year.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense in 2015 relates to state income tax expense for which no net operating loss carryforwards or other credits existed partially offset by refunds primarily associated with prior year federal income tax. We did not recognize any income tax expense in 2014 due to projected net operating loss carryforwards expected to be generated from tax planning strategies and available credits to offset taxable income.

Potential Fluctuations in Quarterly Results and Seasonality

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, including the following:

● timing of new restaurant openings and related expenses;

● profitability of our restaurants, especially in new markets;

● preopening costs for our newly-opened restaurants and operating costs for those locations, which are often materially greater during the first several months of operation than thereafter;

● timing of restaurant remodels and potential lost sales associated with remodel closure;

● labor availability and wages and benefits for hourly and management personnel;

● increases and decreases in comparable restaurant sales;

● impairment of long-lived assets and any loss on restaurant closures;

● fluctuations in commodity and food protein prices;

● changes in borrowings and interest rates;

● general economic conditions;

● weather conditions or natural disasters;

● timing of certain holidays;

● changes in government regulations;

● settlements, damages and legal costs associated with litigation;

● new or revised regulatory requirements and accounting pronouncements; and

● changes in consumer preferences and competitive conditions.

Our business is also subject to seasonal fluctuations. Historically, sales in most of our restaurants have been higher during the spring and summer months and winter holiday season. Consequently, our quarterly and annual operating results and comparable restaurant sales may fluctuate significantly as a result of seasonality and the factors discussed above. Accordingly, results for any one quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for any year and comparable restaurant sales for any particular future period may decrease. In the future, operating results may fall below the expectations of our investors. In that event, the price of our common stock would likely be impacted.

36

Quarterly Results of Operations

The following table presents unaudited consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss) data for each of the eight quarters in the period ended December 31, 2016. We believe that all necessary adjustments have been included to present fairly the quarterly information when read in conjunction with our annual financial statements and related notes. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results for any subsequent quarter.

		Quarter Ended
		2016												2015
		Mar 31			Jun 30			Sept 30			Dec 31			Mar 31			Jun 30			Sept 30			Dec 31
		(in thousands, except per share data)
Restaurant sales	$	39,277		$	43,296		$	43,358		$	43,592		$	32,807		$	36,225		$	35,925		$	38,066
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales		10,501			11,213			11,602			11,998			9,062			9,678			9,812			10,252
Labor		14,118			15,479			16,005			16,425			11,388			12,396			12,687			13,716
Occupancy		3,249			3,258			3,499			3,748			2,357			2,501			2,638			3,032
Restaurant operating expenses		5,639			6,065			6,269			6,767			4,608			4,978			5,238			5,469
General and administrative		3,516			3,337			3,127			3,292			3,283			3,143			3,101			3,085
Preopening		711			1,302			1,430			1,090			817			1,106			1,379			1,444
Depreciation and amortization		3,121			3,380			3,837			4,083			2,184			2,290			2,471			3,021
Asset impairment charge		—			—			—			12,454			—			—			—			—
Other		—			—			—			—			—			(161	)		—			—
Total costs and expenses		40,855			44,034			45,769			59,857			33,699			36,253			37,326			40,019
Income (loss) from operations		(1,578	)		(738	)		(2,411	)		(16,265	)		(892	)		(28	)		(1,401	)		(1,953	)
Interest expense, net		53			72			138			308			45			46			42			46
Income (loss) before income taxes		(1,631	)		(810	)		(2,549	)		(16,573	)		(937	)		(74	)		(1,443	)		(1,999	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		25			25			6			10			(12	)		19			25			12
Net income (loss)	$	(1,656	)	$	(835	)	$	(2,555	)		(16,583	)	$	(925	)	$	(93	)	$	(1,468	)	$	(2,011	)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.24	)	$	(1.58	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.18	)
Diluted	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.24	)	$	(1.58	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.18	)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		11,258			10,932			10,500			10,474			11,235			11,271			11,277			11,271
Diluted		11,258			10,932			10,500			10,474			11,235			11,271			11,277			11,271
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(1,656	)	$	(835	)	$	(2,555	)	$	(16,583	)	$	(925	)	$	(93	)	$	(1,468	)	$	(2,011	)

37

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Currently, our primary ongoing capital requirements are for new restaurant development and remodeling of existing restaurants. Similar to many restaurant companies, we utilize operating lease arrangements for all of our restaurant locations. We believe that our operating lease arrangements provide appropriate leverage for our capital structure in a financially efficient manner. We are typically required to expend cash for leasehold improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment to construct and equip each restaurant. We also require capital resources to maintain our existing base of restaurants, including remodeling, to further expand and strengthen the capabilities of our corporate and information technology infrastructures and for approved stock repurchase programs.

The following tables set forth, as of the dates and for the periods indicated, a summary of our key liquidity measurements (amounts in thousands):

	December 31,
	2016			2015
Cash and short-term investments	$	3,654		$	9,233
Net working capital (deficit)		(10,545	)		(5,466	)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2015
Cash provided by operating activities	$	20,887	$	10,294
Capital expenditures		41,900		38,077

Future Capital Requirements 

Our capital requirements, including development costs related to the opening of new restaurants, have historically been relatively significant. Over the past year, we funded development of new restaurants and remodels primarily from cash flows from operations, funds raised in our 2014 public offering of stock and borrowings under our credit facility. Our future cash requirements and the adequacy of available funds will depend on many factors, including the operating performance of our current restaurants, the pace of expansion and remodels, real estate markets, site locations, the nature of the arrangements negotiated with landlords and capital market accessibility.

We plan to grow organically through unit expansion. We opened eight restaurants during 2016 for a unit growth rate of 22%. We spent $29.5 million in capital expenditures in 2016, net of tenant improvement allowances, for the planned construction and remodel of our restaurants. We are adjusting our projected growth rate for 2017 below our previously targeted growth rate of 20% and believe that a more moderate growth rate will provide us the flexibility to allocate our capital resources, to increase our earnings and to strengthen our balance sheet as well as to focus our time and attention on new restaurant operations and performance.

As of December 31, 2016, we had a working capital deficit of $10.5 million and outstanding borrowings under our credit facility of $26.8 million. We believe existing cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $3.7 million, the ability to draw additional borrowings under our recently amended $60 million credit facility, subject to compliance with certain covenants, and probable future amendments to our credit facility, and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund property additions for new restaurants and planned remodels of existing restaurants during 2017.

During 2016, we repurchased $11.2 million of common stock by completing our November 2015 $10.0 million stock repurchase program and repurchased and retired $1.4 million or 136,790 shares under the October 2016 $5.0 million stock repurchase program. We completed the October 2016 stock repurchase program in February 2017 with the purchase and retirement of 532,376 shares.

Any reduction of our cash flow from operations or an inability to draw on our credit facility may cause a delay or cancellation of future restaurant development or remodels of existing restaurants. Financing to construct new restaurants or remodels for amounts in excess of our current cash and short-term investments and the line of credit availability may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all, and our failure to raise capital when needed could impact our growth plans, financial condition, and results of operations. Additional equity financing, to the extent available, may result in dilution to current stockholders and additional debt financing, if available, may involve significant cash payment obligations or financial covenants and ratios that may restrict our ability to operate our business.

38

Debt and Credit Agreements

On October 12, 2016, we entered into the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Second Amended Credit Agreement”) with KeyBank and Zions First National Bank to (i) increase the credit facility from $35 million to $60 million, comprised of a $45 million revolver (“Revolver”) and a $15 million term loan (“Term Loan”), and (ii) extend the maturity date of the credit facility to October 12, 2021. The credit facility is secured by our personal property and assets. Certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries have also guaranteed the credit facility.

The interest rate under the Second Amended Credit Agreement is KeyBank’s prime rate or LIBOR, at our option, plus an applicable margin depending on our leverage ratio. The LIBOR margins range from 1.75% to 2.75% and the base rate margins range from 0.75% to 1.75%. Payments on the Term Loan are due quarterly and subject to acceleration upon certain events as defined in the Second Amended Credit Agreement, while borrowings on the Revolver are interest only, payable quarterly with respect to each base rate loan and at varying times with respect to LIBOR rate loans, with outstanding principal and interest due at maturity. Prepayment is permitted at any time without penalty, subject to certain restrictions on the order of repayment or prepayment. We are obligated to pay a commitment fee at an annual rate of 0.175% to 0.350%, depending on our leverage ratio, times the unused total revolving commitment of the credit facility based on the average daily amount outstanding under the credit facility for the previous quarter. The commitment fee is payable quarterly in arrears.

The credit facility also requires us to comply with certain covenants, on a quarterly basis, including (a) a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.50 and (b) a maximum leverage ratio of 4.25 to 1.0 through the maturity date. We were in compliance with all covenants at December 31, 2016. We may from time to time request that the total revolving credit commitment under the Second Amended Credit Agreement be increased up to an amount not to exceed $85 million. Any such increase is subject to agreement of the respective lenders in the lending syndicate or new lenders in certain circumstances. Any such increase, which may be for a lesser amount than requested by us, is also subject to certain other terms and conditions as provided in the Second Amended Credit Agreement. Subsequent to Decmeber 31, 2016, we borrowed an additional $8 million on the Credit Facility to fund working capital and the share repurchase program. There is a high likelihood that we will not be in compliance with the leverage ratio requirement at March 31, 2017.  As a result, we have engaged KeyBank, as lead bank, to enter into an amendment of the Credit Facility by March 31, 2017. We believe it is probable that an amendment will be executed and we will be in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2017. However, in the event that we do not enter into any amendment as expected by March 31, 2017, we will be in default of our covenants and the lenders have various remedies which would materially affect our financial condition. See “Debt and Credit Agreements” in Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on our debt and credit agreements. 

Cash Flows

      The following table summarizes our primary sources and uses of cash during the past three years:

	2016			2015			2014
	(In thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	20,887		$	10,294		$	14,744
Investing activities		(42,033	)		(38,215	)		(21,858	)
Financing activities		15,567			398			37,811
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	(5,579	)	$	(27,523	)	$	30,697

Operating Activities. We generated $20.9 million, $10.3 million and $14.7 million of operating cash flows in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The change in each comparative period was primarily due to the timing of payments for accounts payable and accrued expenses and the change in deferred rent as a result of recording tenant improvement allowances for new restaurants, offset by variation in our net income (loss).

39

Investing activities. We fund the development and construction of new restaurants and remodels primarily with cash flows from operations, borrowings under our credit facility and funds we raised in a 2014 public offering of our common stock. Capital expenditures in 2016 were $41.9 million, primarily associated with our eight new restaurant openings, costs for our Boca Park restaurant remodel, residual payments from restaurants opened during the fourth quarter of 2015 as well as construction, architecture and design costs associated with planned new restaurant openings and remodels for the first half of 2017 and maintenance capital expenditures. Capital expenditures in 2015 were $38.1 million, primarily associated with seven new restaurant openings, our Denver restaurant remodel, maintenance capital expenditures for existing locations as well as architecture, design and construction-related costs associated with new restaurants opened in the first half of 2016. Capital expenditures in 2014 were $21.9 million, driven by the additions of leasehold improvements, equipment and furniture and fixtures for five restaurants opened during 2014, maintenance capital expenditures for existing restaurants as well as expenditures for restaurants opened in early 2015.

Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities for 2016 consisted of $29.5 million of borrowings under our revolving credit facility and term loan and $0.7 million of net proceeds from stock option exercises, partially offset by $2.7 million in repayments on both the revolving credit facility and term loan, in addition to, $11.2 million in cash outflows for the repurchase of our common stock, $0.2 million for withholding tax payments from net settled option exercises and $0.5 million of debt issuance costs. Net cash provided by financing activities during 2015 consisted of $0.6 million of proceeds from stock option exercises partially offsetting a $0.2 million purchase and retirement of our common stock under the November 2015 authorization. Net cash provided by financing activities during 2014 consisted of $40.9 million of net proceeds from our public offering of 2.345 million shares of common stock and $0.6 million from stock option exercises and employee stock purchases. The cash inflow was partially offset by a $3.5 million debt repayment on the KeyBank credit facility borrowings and $0.2 million in fees incurred for the KeyBank credit facility upsizing in November 2014.

Aggregate Contractual Obligations

The following table sets forth our contractual commitments as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands).

		Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations		Total		Less than  1 year		1-3  years		3-5  years		More than  5 years
Debt (1)	$	26,813	$	750	$	1,969	$	24,094	$	—
Operating leases (2)		134,194		16,110		31,850		30,463		55,771
Total	$	161,007	$	16,860	$	33,819	$	54,557	$	55,771

(1) The table above reflects obligations for all principal debt payments, but does not include interest payments on our variable-rate revolving credit facility and any commitment fees, primarily because the rates and balance outstanding can fluctuate. See Note 4 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details on interest expense and commitment fees.

(2) The table above reflects obligations for all leases signed for restaurants but does not include obligations related to lease renewal option periods even if it is reasonably assured that we will exercise the related option. We have evaluated and determined that we do not have any purchase obligations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We had no off-balance sheet guarantees or off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2016.

40

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are those that we believe are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and also require our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments. Judgments or uncertainties regarding the application of these policies may result in materially different amounts being reported under various conditions or using different assumptions. We consider the following policies to be the most critical in understanding the judgment that is involved in preparing our consolidated financial statements.

Property and Equipment

We record property and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation, and we select useful lives that reflect the estimated economic lives of the underlying assets. We amortize leasehold improvements over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the related lease term. We calculate depreciation using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes. We capitalize improvements and expense repairs and maintenance costs as incurred. We are often required to exercise judgment in our decision whether to capitalize an asset or expense an expenditure that is for maintenance and repairs. The useful life of property and equipment and the determination as to what constitutes a capitalized cost versus a repair and maintenance expense involves judgment by management, which may produce different amounts of repair and maintenance or depreciation expense if different assumptions were used.

We evaluate property and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in restaurant operating results indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. Factors considered include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; significant negative industry or economic trends; and significant changes in laws and regulations, legal factors or in the business climate. The assessment of impairment is performed on a restaurant-by-restaurant basis. Recoverability is assessed by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. This assessment process requires the use of estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows and estimated useful lives, which are subject to a significant degree of judgment. If indicators of impairment are present and if we determine that the carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the restaurant assets, an impairment charge is recorded to reduce the carrying value of the asset to its fair value. Calculation of fair value requires significant estimates and judgments which could vary significantly based on our assumptions.

We recorded long-lived asset impairment charges of $12.5 million, for the year ended December 31, 2016. Such amounts are included in "Asset impairment charge" in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. (See Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details on the impairment charges.) We continue to monitor the operating performance of each individual restaurant. We may be required to record impairment charges in the future if certain restaurants perform below expectations.

Leasing Activities

We lease all of our restaurant properties. At the inception of the lease, we evaluate each property and classify the lease as an operating or capital lease in accordance with applicable accounting standards. We exercise significant judgment in determining the estimated fair value of the restaurant as well as the discount rate used to discount the future minimum lease payments. The term used for this evaluation includes renewal option periods only in instances in which the exercise of the renewal option can reasonably be assured and failure to exercise such option would result in an economic penalty. All of our restaurant leases are classified as operating leases.

Our lease term used for straight-line rent expense is calculated from the date we take possession of the leased premises through the lease termination date. There is potential for variability in our “rent holiday” period which typically begins on the possession date and ends on the store open date. Factors that may affect the length of the rent holiday period generally include construction related delays or situations where we take possession of the leased premises upon execution of the lease. Extension of the rent holiday period due to delays in restaurant opening will result in greater rent expensed during the rent holiday period.

41

We record contingent rent expense based on a percentage of restaurant sales amounts that exceed a specified sales threshold over the periods the liability is incurred. Contingent rent expense is recorded prior to achievement of specified sales levels if achievement of such amounts is considered probable and estimable.

Leasehold improvements financed by the landlord through tenant improvement allowances are capitalized as leasehold improvements with the tenant improvement allowances recorded as deferred lease incentives. Deferred lease incentives are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the life of the asset or the lease term, including option periods which in the judgment of management are reasonably assured of renewal (same term that is used for related leasehold improvements) and are recorded as a reduction of occupancy expense. As part of the initial lease terms, we negotiate with our landlords to secure these tenant improvement allowances. There is no guarantee that we will receive tenant improvement allowances for any of our future locations, which would result in additional occupancy expenses.

In February 2016, ASC Topic 842, Leases, was issued to increase the transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. In order to meet that objective, the new standard requires recognition of the assets and liabilities that arise from leases. Accordingly, a lessee will recognize a right-of-use (ROU) asset for its right to use the underlying asset and a lease liability for the corresponding lease obligation. Both the ROU asset and lease liability will initially be measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term. Subsequent measurement, including the presentation of expenses and cash flows, will depend on the classification of the lease as either a finance or an operating lease. Initial costs directly attributable to negotiating and arranging the lease will be included in the ROU asset. Lessees can make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize a ROU asset and corresponding lease liability for leases with a term of 12 months or less. All of our restaurant leases are accounted for as operating leases, with no related assets and liabilities on our balance sheet. Accordingly, changes in lease accounting rules or their interpretation, or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates or judgments by us could significantly change our reported or expected financial performance.

Income Taxes

We provide for income taxes based on our estimate of federal and state tax liabilities. These estimates consider, among other items, effective rates for state and local income taxes, allowable tax credits for items such as taxes paid on reported tip income, estimates related to depreciation and amortization expense allowable for tax purposes, and the tax deductibility of certain other items. Our estimates are based on information available to us at the time we prepare the income tax provision. Income tax returns are subject to audit by federal, state, and local governments, generally years after the returns are filed. These returns could be subject to material adjustments or differing interpretations of the tax laws.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future income tax consequences of carryforwards and temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the income tax rate in effect during the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The realization of tax benefits of deductible temporary differences and operating loss or tax credit carryforwards will depend on whether we have sufficient taxable income within the carryback and carryforward periods permitted by tax law to allow for utilization of the deductible amounts and carryforwards. We record net deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making this determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. In the event we determine that we would be able to realize our deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, we will make an adjustment to the valuation allowance which would likely result in an income tax benefit.

42

Stock-Based Compensation

We apply the Black-Scholes valuation model in determining the fair value of stock option awards, which requires the use of a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to the actual and projected employee and director stock option exercise behavior, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected dividends, and expected term. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock. We utilize historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination behavior within the valuation model. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option. We also estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise these estimates, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. We estimate forfeitures based on our expectation of future experience while considering our historical experience. Changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value of stock-based compensation and consequently, the related amount recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss). We are also required to establish deferred tax assets for expense relating to options that would be expected to generate a tax deduction under their original terms. The recoverability of such assets are dependent upon the actual deduction that may be available at exercise and can further be impaired by either the expiration of the option or an overall valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.

We believe the estimates and assumptions related to these critical accounting policies are appropriate under the circumstances; however, should future events result in unanticipated consequences, there could be a material impact on our future financial condition or results of operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 Recently Issued Accounting Standards to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The following discussion of market risks contains forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from the following discussion based on general conditions in the commodity and capital markets.

Primary Market Risk Exposures

Our primary market risk exposure is commodity costs. Many of the food products purchased by us can be subject to volatility due to changes in weather, production, availability, seasonality, international demand, and other factors outside our control. Substantially all of our food and supplies are available from several sources, which help to diversify our overall commodity cost risk. We also believe that we have the ability to increase certain menu prices in response to food commodity price increases.

We may also face market risk exposure due to the variable interest rates on our credit line. Interest on the loans is subject to adjustment based on changes to the prime or LIBOR rate. Interest rate fluctuations may adversely impact our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Reference is made to the consolidated financial statements, the notes thereto, and the report thereon, commencing on page F-1 of this report, which financial statements, notes, and report are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

43

Item 9A.     Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) are our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2016. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting during our fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As defined in the securities laws, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by our Board of Directors, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the acquisitions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (the “2013 framework”). Based on that assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on the criteria established in the 2013 framework.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. This report is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 9B.     Other Information

Not applicable.

44

PART III

Item 10.      Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this Item relating to our directors, executive officers and corporate governance is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 11.      Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information contained in the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 12.     Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information contained in the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 13.      Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information contained in the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 14.      Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information contained in the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

PART IV

Item 15.      Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) The following documents are filed as a part of the report:

(1)   Financial Statements

Financial Statements are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1 of this report.

(2)   Financial Statement Schedules

No financial statement schedules are included because such schedules are not applicable, are not required, or because required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

45

(3) Exhibits

Exhibit Number	Exhibit
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (1)
3.2	Certificate of Designations, Preferences, and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Kona Grill, Inc. (6)
3.3	Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights of Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Kona Grill, Inc. filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on September 7, 2016 (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed September 7, 2016)
3.4	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Kona Grill, Inc., as of October 30, 2007 (5)
4.1	Form of Common Stock Certificate (2)
4.2	Rights Agreement dated September 6, 2016 by and between Kona Grill, Inc. and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed September 7, 2016)
10.11*	Kona Grill, Inc. 2005 Stock Award Plan (1)
10.12*	Kona Grill, Inc. 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (amended as of August 15, 2005) (3)
10.15* 10.16*	Form of Stock Option Agreement (2005 Stock Award Plan) (4) Kona Grill, Inc. 2012 Stock Award Plan, as amended (8)
10.30*	Employment Agreement, dated as of February 5, 2015, between the Company and Berke Bakay (7)
10.36	Form of Stock Option Agreement (2012 Stock Award Plan) (9)
10.37	Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of October 12, 2016 (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed October 18, 2016)
10.38	Amended and Restated Subsidiary Guaranty dated as of October 12, 2016 (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed October 18, 2016)
10.39	Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of October 12, 2016 (incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed October 18, 2016)
21	List of Subsidiaries
23	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
32.1	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101	The following materials from Kona Grill Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2016, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL), (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement in which directors or executive officers are eligible to participate.

(1) Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Commission on August 4, 2015.

(2) Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-125506), as filed on July 21, 2005.

(3) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-127593), as filed with the Commission on August 16, 2005.

(4) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Commission on May 8, 2006.

(5) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on November 5, 2007.

(6) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on May 28, 2008.

(7) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 11, 2015.

(8) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Commission on August 4, 2015.

(9) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Commission on March 15, 2013.

46

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

KONA GRILL, INC.

/s/ Berke Bakay                                                                 

Berke Bakay

President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 13, 2017

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Capacity	Date
/s/  Berke Bakay	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	March 13, 2017
Berke Bakay	(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Christi Hing	Chief Financial Officer	March 13, 2017
Christi Hing	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Richard J. Hauser	Director	March 13, 2017
Richard J. Hauser
/s/ James R. Jundt	Director	March 13, 2017
James R. Jundt
/s/  Marcus E. Jundt	Director	March 13, 2017
Marcus E. Jundt
/s/ Leonard Newman	Director	March 13, 2017
Leonard Newman
/s/ Steven W. Schussler	Director	March 13, 2017
Steven W. Schussler
/s/  Anthony L. Winczewski	Director	March 13, 2017
Anthony L. Winczewski

47

KONA GRILL, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)	F-5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-8

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Kona Grill, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Kona Grill, Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Kona Grill, Inc. at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Kona Grill, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated March 13, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

March 13, 2017

F-2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Kona Grill, Inc.

We have audited Kona Grill, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Kona Grill, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Kona Grill, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Kona Grill, Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 and our report dated March 13, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

March 13, 2017

F-3

KONA GRILL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)

	December 31,
	2016			2015
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,476		$	9,055
Investments		178			178
Receivables		1,850			1,574
Inventory		2,176			1,865
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1,052			774
Total current assets		8,732			13,446
Other assets		1,383			1,146
Property and equipment, net		98,268			87,252
Total assets	$	108,383		$	101,844
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	4,115		$	4,548
Accrued expenses		14,450			14,282
Current portion of long term debt		712			—
Total current liabilities		19,277			18,830
Long term debt		25,921			—
Deferred rent and other long term liabilities		31,610			20,323
Total liabilities		76,808			39,153
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized; none issued		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized, 10,568,230 shares issued and 10,452,030 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 11,387,724 shares issued and 11,271,524 shares outstanding at December 31, 2015		106			114
Additional paid-in capital		88,703			98,182
Accumulated deficit		(56,234	)		(34,605	)
Treasury stock, at cost, 116,200 shares at December 31, 2016 and 2015		(1,000	)		(1,000	)
Total stockholders’ equity		31,575			62,691
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	108,383		$	101,844

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-4

KONA GRILL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(In thousands, except per share data)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Restaurant sales	$	169,523		$	143,023		$	119,097
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales		45,314			38,803			32,964
Labor		62,027			50,187			40,336
Occupancy		13,754			10,528			8,061
Restaurant operating expenses		24,740			20,293			16,358
General and administrative		13,272			12,612			10,715
Preopening expense		4,533			4,746			2,481
Depreciation and amortization		14,421			9,966			7,220
Asset impairment charge		12,454			—			—
Other		—			161			—
Total costs and expenses		190,515			147,296			118,135
Income (loss) from operations		(20,992	)		(4,273	)		962
Write off of deferred financing costs		—			—			39
Interest expense, net		571			180			220
Income (loss) before income taxes		(21,563	)		(4,453	)		703
Income tax expense		66			43			—
Net income (loss)	$	(21,629	)	$	(4,496	)	$	703
Net income (loss) per share (Note 1):
Basic	$	(2.00	)	$	(0.40	)	$	0.07
Diluted	$	(2.00	)	$	(0.40	)	$	0.07
Weighted average shares outstanding (Note 1):
Basic		10,791			11,264			9,870
Diluted		10,791			11,264			10,263
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(21,629	)	$	(4,496	)	$	703

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-5

KONA GRILL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands)

							Additional
	Common Stock						Paid-in			Accumulated			Treasury			Stockholders’
	Shares			Amount			Capital			Deficit			Stock			Equity
Balances at December 31, 2013		8,603			87			54,083			(30,812	)		(1,000	)		22,358
Stock-based compensation		—			—			856			—			—			856
Issuance of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of stock options, net of share repurchase for minimum tax withholdings		261			3			627			—			—			630
Issuance of common stock, net of offering expenses		2,345			23			40,856			—			—			40,879
Net income		—			—			—			703			—			703
Other comprehensive income		—			—			—			—			—			—
Total comprehensive income																	703
Balances at December 31, 2014		11,209			113			96,422			(30,109	)		(1,000	)		65,426
Stock-based compensation		—			—			1,363			—			—			1,363
Issuance of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of stock options		81			1			624			—			—			625
Purchase and retirement of common stock		(18	)		—			(227	)		—			—			(227	)
Net income (loss)		—			—			—			(4,496	)		—			(4,496	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		—			—			—			—			—			—
Total comprehensive income (loss)																	(4,496	)
Balances at December 31, 2015		11,272			114			98,182			(34,605	)		(1,000	)		62,691
Stock-based compensation		—			—			1,262			—			—			1,262
Issuance of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of stock options net of share repurchase for minimum tax withholdings		132			1			450			—			—			451
Purchase and retirement of common stock		(952	)		(9	)		(11,191	)		—			—			(11,200	)
Net income (loss)		—			—			—			(21,629	)		—			(21,629	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		—			—			—			—			—			—
Total comprehensive income (loss)																	(21,629	)
Balances at December 31, 2016		10,452		$	106		$	88,703		$	(56,234	)	$	(1,000	)	$	31,575

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-6

KONA GRILL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	(21,629	)	$	(4.496	)	$	703
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		14,421			9,781			7,176
Stock-based compensation		1,262			1,363			856
Loss on disposal of assets		—			185			44
Amortization of deferred financing costs		99			81			104
Write off of deferred financing costs		—			—			39
Asset impairment charge		12,454			—			—
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables		(275	)		(1,187	)		458
Inventory		(311	)		(366	)		(287	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(164	)		(69	)		(336	)
Accounts payable		564			86			323
Accrued expenses		4,044			1,290			1,599
Deferred rent and other long term liabilities		10,422			3,626			4,065
Net cash provided by operating activities		20,887			10,294			14,744
Investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment		(41,900	)		(38,077	)		(21,855	)
Change in other assets		(133	)		(138	)		(3	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(42,033	)		(38,215	)		(21,858	)
Financing activities
Borrowings from revolving credit facility		14,500			—			—
Repayments on revolving credit facility		(2,500	)		—			(3,500	)
Borrowings from term loan		15,000			—			—
Repayments on term loan		(188	)		—			—
Fees paid for credit facility		(496	)		—			(198	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance expense		—			—			40,879
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of stock options		674			625			1,466
Payment for withholding tax from net settled stock option exercise		(223	)		—			(836	)
Purchase and retirement of common stock		(11,200	)		(227	)		—
Net cash provided by financing activities		15,567			398			37,811
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(5,579	)		(27,523	)		30,697
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year		9,055			36,578			5,881
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year	$	3,476		$	9,055		$	36,578
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid for interest (net of capitalized interest)	$	323		$	99		$	161
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds	$	2		$	12		$	110
Noncash investing activities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses related to property and equipment purchases	$	3,258		$	7,266		$	2,060

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-7

KONA GRILL, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business

Kona Grill, Inc., including its wholly-owned subsidiaries, (referred to herein as the “Company” or “we,” “us,” and “our”) owns and operates upscale casual dining restaurants under the name “Kona Grill.” Our restaurants feature a diverse selection of contemporary American favorites and award-winning sushi items that are prepared fresh daily at each restaurant location. As of December 31, 2016, we owned and operated 45 restaurants in 23 states throughout the United States and Puerto Rico. Our chief operating decision maker function is comprised of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer who manage our restaurant operation base that aggregates into one reportable segment. Accordingly, we have a single operating segment and reporting unit structure.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications of prior year’s financial statement amounts have been made to conform to the current year presentation including:

● As of January 1, 2016 we added the additional line item “Inventory” to the consolidated balance sheet. As a result, $1,865,000 was reclassified from “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” to “Inventory” on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015, and

● As of January 1, 2016, the related current portion of debt issuance costs associated with our asset-based revolving credit facility of $113,000 and $82,000 have been reclassified from "Other assets" to "Prepaid expense and other current assets" on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. See further discussion below under " Recently Issued Accounting Standards."

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into cash and have an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Amounts receivable from credit card processors are also considered cash equivalents because they are both short-term and highly liquid in nature and are typically converted to cash within several business days of the sales transaction.

Investments

Investments consist primarily of certificates of deposit that are generally highly liquid in nature. We classify our investments based on the intended holding period.

F-8

KONA GRILL, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Inventory

Inventory consists of food and beverage products that are valued at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out method.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk principally consist of cash and cash equivalents, investments and accounts receivable. Concentration of credit risk is limited by diversifying cash deposits among a variety of high credit-quality issuers. At times, cash and cash equivalent balances may be in excess of the FDIC insurance limit.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. We capitalize all direct costs on the construction of leasehold improvements and interest incurred during the construction and development period. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the related lease term that includes reasonably assured lease renewals as determined on the date of acquisition of the leasehold improvement. Improvements that materially extend the life of an asset are capitalized while repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Depreciation and amortization are recorded on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives:

Furniture and fixtures (in years)	5	-	7
Equipment (in years)	2	-	7
Computer software and electronic equipment (in years)		3
Leasehold improvements	Shorter of the useful life or the lease term

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in restaurant operating results indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. Factors considered include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; significant negative industry or economic trends; and significant changes in legal factors or in the business climate. The assessment of impairment is performed on a restaurant-by-restaurant basis. Recoverability is assessed by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. This assessment process requires the use of estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows and estimated useful lives, which are subject to a significant degree of judgment. If indicators of impairment are present and if we determine that the carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the restaurant assets, an impairment charge is recorded to reduce the carrying value of the asset to its fair value.

As a result of the process described above, we recorded long-lived asset impairment charge of $12.5 million, for the year ended December 31, 2016. Such amounts are included in "Asset impairment charge" in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss) (Note 2).

F-9

KONA GRILL, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that is determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, a three-tier value hierarchy was established, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value.

Level 1: Fair values determined by quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access.

Level 2: Fair values utilize inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.

Level 3: Fair values determined by unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data and may reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The carrying value for certain of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates fair value because of their short-term nature. Our investments represent certificates of deposit and are considered available-for-sale securities that are valued using market observable inputs (Level 2). Our long-term debt, when incurred, is valued using primarily Level 2 inputs including current applicable rates for similar instruments and approximates the carrying value of such obligations.

In addition to our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, we are required by GAAP to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis after initial recognition. Generally, assets, liabilities and reporting units are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as a result of impairment reviews and any resulting impairment charge. In connection with our impairment review of long-lived assets described in Note 2, we measured the fair value of our asset groups that were not deemed recoverable, based on Level 3 inputs consisting of the discounted future cash flows associated with the use and eventual disposition of the asset group. The discounted cash flow method is based on Level 3 inputs consisting primarily of our restaurant forecasts and utilizes forward-looking assumptions and projections, as well as factors impacting long-range plans such as pricing, discount rates and commodity prices.

Leases

We lease our restaurant locations under operating lease agreements with initial terms of approximately 10 to 20 years. Most of these agreements require minimum annual rent payments plus contingent rent payments based on a percentage of restaurant sales which exceed the minimum base sales threshold. Contingent rent payments, to the extent they exceed minimum payments, are accrued over the periods in which the liability is incurred. Rent expense associated with these contingent payments is recorded prior to the achievement of specified sales levels if exceeding such amount is considered probable and is estimable. The lease agreements typically also require scheduled increases to minimum annual rent payments. For leases that contain rent escalations, we record the total rent payable over the initial lease term, starting on the date we gain possession of the property (including the construction period), on a straight-line basis. Any difference between minimum rent and straight-line rent is recorded as deferred rent. Deferred rent also includes tenant improvement allowances which are amortized as a reduction of rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. As part of the initial lease terms, we negotiate with our landlords to secure these tenant improvement allowances and record such allowances as lease incentive receivables when determined to be collectible. These amounts are included in receivables on the balance sheet.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues from food, beverage, and alcohol sales are recognized when payment is tendered at the point of sale. Restaurant sales are recorded net of promotions and discounts. Revenues from gift card sales are recognized upon redemption. Prior to redemption, the outstanding balances of all gift cards are included in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

F-10

KONA GRILL, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In February and April 2016, we entered into franchise agreements for the development of six Kona Grill restaurants in Mexico and six restaurants in the United Arab Emirates. Territory and franchise fees received in conjunction with these agreements are recorded as deferred revenue and included in “Deferred rent and other long term liabilities” in our consolidated balance sheets. Territory fees are recognized as income on a pro-rata basis at the same time the individual franchise fees for each location are considered earned, typically when the individual franchise unit is opened. We have not recognized any franchise related income for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Sales Taxes

Revenues are presented net of sales taxes. The sales tax obligation is included in accrued expenses until the taxes are remitted to the appropriate taxing authorities.

Advertising and Marketing Costs

Advertising and marketing costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising and marketing expense for 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $935,000, $744,000 and $461,000, respectively, and is included in restaurant operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). We maintain a customer loyalty club (the Konavore™ program), an email-based marketing program designed to communicate new menu offerings, restaurant specific events, and other marketing messages to keep Kona Grill top of mind for consumers. The Konavore™ loyalty program offers members a discount coupon upon enrolling in the program and a discount coupon for a member’s birthday. These coupons are recognized upon redemption and recorded in the financial statements as a sales discount. Costs associated with the redemption of a promotion in the form of a coupon for discounted product are recorded in cost of sales as these coupons are typically redeemed with the purchase of additional food and beverage items. Costs associated with promotional giveaways of food and beverages to local businesses and sponsorship of events are viewed as advertising in nature and recorded in restaurant operating expenses.

Preopening Expense

Costs directly related to the opening of new restaurants, including employee relocation, travel, employee payroll and related training costs, and rent expense subsequent to the date we take possession of the property through the restaurant opening are expensed as incurred.

Stock-Based Compensation

We maintain stock award plans under which we may issue incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, and other types of awards to employees, directors, and consultants. Stock options issued under these plans are granted with an exercise price at or above the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and expire five years from the date of grant. Employee stock options generally vest 25% each year over a four-year period, while annual recurring awards for non-employee director options vest 25% each quarter over a one-year period. Certain stock option awards for executive officers may vest earlier in the event of a change of control or termination, as defined in the executive officer’s employment agreement. We apply the Black-Scholes valuation model in determining the fair value of stock option grants. We recognize compensation cost for our stock awards using a graded vesting schedule on a straight line basis over the requisite service period.

Income Taxes

We utilize the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed at each balance sheet date for temporary differences between the consolidated financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on tax rates in effect in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts that will more likely than not be realized.

F-11

KONA GRILL, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We recognize the impact of a tax position in our financial statements if that position more likely than not will be sustained upon examination by a tax authority. We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss) per share is computed similarly except that weighted average common shares is increased to reflect all dilutive instruments, including stock options. The dilutive effects of the dilutive securities are calculated using the treasury stock method and only those instruments that result in a reduction in income per share are included in the calculation. For 2016, 2015 and 2014, there were 790,000, 608,000 and 197,000 stock options outstanding, respectively, that were not included in the dilutive earnings per share calculation because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	(21,629	)	$	(4,496	)	$	703
Denominator:
Weighted average shares — basic		10,791			11,264			9,870
Effect of dilutive stock options		—			—			393
Weighted average shares — diluted		10,791			11,264			10,263
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(2.00	)	$	(0.40	)	$	0.07
Diluted	$	(2.00	)	$	(0.40	)	$	0.07

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The pronouncement was issued to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We are currently performing an assessment of the revised standard and impacts on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures. To date, we have reviewed a sample of contracts that are representative of the current types of revenue generating streams. We are still in the process of completing our assessment of the impacts, including the potential impacts on variable consideration on royalty income received from franchise sales; however, based on the initial assessment we do not expect it to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements, and based on preliminary findings, we do not expect these areas to have an impact on revenue recognition. We expect to have an update to the impacts of the standard in the second quarter of 2017.

We anticipate adopting the new standard effective January 1, 2018. The guidance may be applied retrospectively for all periods presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application. We currently anticipate adopting the standard retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the amended guidance recognized at January 1, 2018.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. This guidance requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of that debt liability. However, the guidance in ASU 2015-15, issued in August 2015, Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements, prescribes that deferred initial up-front commitment fees paid by a borrower to a lender represent the benefit of being able to access capital over the contractual term, and therefore, meet the definition of an asset, while debt issuance costs in the scope of ASU 2015-03 do not. As such, the Company will continue to present the costs associated with its asset-based revolving credit facility as an asset. Debt issuance costs associated with our asset-based revolving credit facility of $539,000 as of December 31, 2016 are included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other assets in the consolidated balance sheet, while debt issuance costs of $180,000 associated with our term loan are netted against the outstanding debt.

F-12

KONA GRILL, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40). The pronouncement was issued to provide guidance concerning accounting for fees in a cloud computing arrangement. We have elected to adopt the guidance prospectively. The adoption of ASU 2015-05 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In February 2016, ASC Topic 842, Leases, was issued to increase the transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. In order to meet that objective, the new standard requires recognition of the assets and liabilities that arise from leases. Accordingly, a lessee will recognize a right-of-use (ROU) asset for its right to use the underlying asset and a lease liability for the corresponding lease obligation. Both the ROU asset and lease liability will initially be measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term. Subsequent measurement, including the presentation of expenses and cash flows, will depend on the classification of the lease as either finance or an operating lease. Initial costs directly attributable to negotiating and arranging the lease will be included in the ROU asset. Lessees can make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize a ROU asset and corresponding lease liability for leases with a term of 12 months or less. Accounting by lessors will remain largely unchanged from current U.S. GAAP. In transition, lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients that companies may elect to apply. These practical expedients relate to the identification and classification of leases that commenced before the effective date, initial direct costs for leases that commenced before the effective date, and the ability to use hindsight in evaluating lessee options to extend or terminate a lease or to purchase the underlying asset. The transition guidance also provides specific guidance for sale and leaseback transactions, build-to-suit leases, leveraged leases, and amounts previously recognized in accordance with the business combinations guidance for leases. The new standard is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The expected adoption method is being evaluated by us. We expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) which simplifies the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The company will adopt this standard effective January 1, 2017. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows – Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments as stakeholders indicated that there is diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230, Statement of Cash Flows, and other Topics. This ASU addressed eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The amendments should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. We will adopt this standard effective January 1, 2017 noting it will not have any impact on the way we report items within our statement of cash flows.

F-13

KONA GRILL, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2.       Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2016			2015
Leasehold improvements	$	115,902		$	96,473
Equipment		29,900			25,825
Furniture and fixtures		12,196			11,126
		157,998			133,424
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(62,921	)		(54,027	)
		95,077			79,397
Construction in progress		3,191			7,855
Total property and equipment, net	$	98,268		$	87,252

We capitalize direct internal payroll and travel costs on the construction of leasehold improvements incurred during the construction and development period. Capitalized costs were $1,318,000 and $774,000 in 2016 and 2015, respectively.

We review the carrying value of our long-lived assets on a restaurant-by-restaurant basis when indicators of potential impairment exist. Such indicators include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to expected, historical or projected future operating results; significant negative industry or economic trends; and significant changes in laws and regulations. Given the continued underperformance of certain restaurants we determined impairment indicators were present as of December 31, 2016. As such, we conducted additional impairment analyses and performed a recoverability test which ultimately concluded the property and equipment of five restaurants were impaired.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded non-cash asset impairment charges of $12.5 million for five underperforming restaurants based upon an assessment of each restaurant’s historical operating performance combined with expected cash flows for these restaurants over the respective remaining lease term. We reduced the carrying value of these assets to their estimated fair value which was determined using a discounted cash flow model or the market value of each restaurant’s assets. The fair values of each of the reporting units as well as the related assets and liabilities utilized to determine the impairment were measured using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs as described in Note 2. This impairment charge was recorded to asset impairment charge in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss).

While, we do not intend to close any of these underperforming restaurants at this time, we will continue to evaluate each of these restaurants on a case-by-case basis. Additionally, while we believe that our estimates of fair value are appropriate, we will continue to monitor these asset values of each individual restaurant.  Additionally, should actual values differ materially from our estimates, we may be required to record impairment charges in the future.

F-14

KONA GRILL, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3.   Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2016		2015
Accrued payroll and benefits	$	4,549	$	3,786
Gift cards		4,311		2,309
Accrued construction and remodel (1)		2,005		5,017
Sales and use taxes		1,776		1,678
Business and income taxes		563		321
Accrued occupancy		240		296
Other		1,006		875
Total accrued expenses	$	14,450	$	14,282

(1) Balance is attributable to property additions for our new restaurants and remodels.

4.     Debt and Credit Agreements

On April 19, 2013, we entered into a Credit Agreement for a $20 million revolving line of credit maturing on April 19, 2017 with KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”) and Stearns Bank National Association (“Stearns Bank”). On November 7, 2014, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amended Credit Agreement”) with KeyBank to (i) increase the credit facility from $20 million to $35 million, and (ii) extend the maturity date of the credit facility to November 7, 2019. On October 12, 2016, we entered into the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Second Amended Credit Agreement”) with KeyBank and Zions First National Bank to (i) increase the credit facility from $35 million to $60 million, comprised of a $45 million revolver (“Revolver”) and $15 million term loan (“Term Loan”), and (ii) extend the maturity date of the credit facility to October 12, 2021. The credit facility is secured by our personal property and assets. Certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries have also guaranteed the credit facility.

		December 31, 2016							December 31, 2015
	Maturity Date	Unamortized Deferred Financing Costs (a)		Fair Value of Debt (b)		Carrying Value of Debt			Carrying Value of Debt
Revolver	Oct. 2021	$	539	$	12,000	$	12,000		$	-
Term Loan	Oct. 2021		180		14,813		14,813			-
Total debt		$	719	$	26,813		26,813			-
Debt issuance costs presented with debt (a)							(180	)		-
Total debt, net							26,633
Less: current portion							712
Long term debt						$	25,921		$	-

(a) We have presented the deferred financing costs associated with the Term Loan in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability as of December 31, 2016. The deferred financing costs related to the Revolver continue to be presented as an asset, and are included in both Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other assets on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

(b) Our Revolver and Term Loan bear interest at rates commensurate with market rates and therefore their respective carrying values approximate fair value.

The interest rate under the Second Amended Credit Agreement is KeyBank’s base rate or LIBOR, at our option, plus an applicable margin depending on our leverage ratio. The LIBOR margins range from 1.75% to 2.75% and the base rate margins range from 0.75% to 1.75%. Payments on the Term Loan are due quarterly and subject to acceleration upon certain events as defined in the Second Amended Credit Agreement, while borrowings on the Revolver are interest only, payable quarterly with respect to each base rate loan and at varying times with respect to LIBOR rate loans, with outstanding principal and interest due at maturity. Prepayment is permitted at any time without penalty, subject to certain restrictions on the order of repayment or prepayment. We are obligated to pay a commitment fee at an annual rate of 0.175% to 0.350%, depending on our leverage ratio, times the unused total revolving commitment of the credit facility based on the average daily amount outstanding under the credit facility for the previous quarter. The commitment fee is payable quarterly in arrears.

F-15

KONA GRILL, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

At December 31, 2016 we had $26.8 million in outstanding borrowings and $33.2 million available under the credit facility, subject to compliance with certain covenants. We incurred gross interest expense of $572,000, $184,000 and $269,000 during the year ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Capitalized interest was $178,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. We did not capitalize any interest for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Our current projections indicate that we will maintain the outstanding borrowings for the next 12 months and, as a result, all borrowings under the credit facility are classified as long-term debt, except for the quarterly amortization payments for the Term Loan which are classified as current portion of long term debt.

The required principal payments for all borrowings for each of the five years following the balance sheet date are as follows (in thousands):

2017	$	750
2018		844
2019		1,125
2020		1,219
2021		22,875
Thereafter		—
Total	$	26,813

The credit facility also requires us to comply with certain covenants on a quarterly basis, including (a) a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.50 and (b) a maximum leverage ratio of 4.25 to 1.0 through the maturity date. We were in compliance with all covenants at December 31, 2016. We may from time to time request that the total revolving credit commitment under the Second Amended Credit Agreement be increased up to an amount not to exceed $85 million. Any such increase is subject to agreement of the respective lenders in the lending syndicate or new lenders in certain circumstances. Any such increase, which may be for a lesser amount than requested by us, is also subject to certain other terms and conditions as provided in the Second Amended Credit Agreement. Subsequent to December 31, 2016, we borrowed an additional $8 million on the Credit Facility to fund working capital and the share repurchase program. There is a high likelihood that we will not be in compliance with the leverage ratio requirement at March 31, 2017.  As a result, we have engaged KeyBank, as lead bank, to enter into an amendment of the Credit Facility by March 31, 2017. We believe it is probable that an amendment will be executed and we will be in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2017. However, in the event that we do not enter into any amendment as expected by March 31, 2017, we will be in default of our covenants and the lenders have various remedies which would materially affect our financial condition.

5.     Income Taxes

Income tax expense (benefit) consisted of the following (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2015		2014
Current:
Federal	$	—	$	—	$	—
State		66		43		—
		66		43		—
Deferred:
Federal		—		—		—
State		—		—		—
		—		—		—
Total	$	66	$	43	$	—

F-16

KONA GRILL, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Income tax expense (benefit) differed from amounts computed by applying the federal statutory rate to income (loss) from operations before provision for income taxes as follows (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
Income tax expense (benefit) at federal statutory rate of 34%	$	(7,331	)	$	(1,514	)	$	239
State income taxes, net of federal benefit		(1,382	)		46			41
Nondeductible expenses		701			583			484
Business tax credit		(1,692	)		(1,503	)		(1,959	)
Other		108			(273	)		(32	)
Change in valuation allowance		9,662			2,704	)		1,227
Total	$	66		$	43		$	—

The temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2016			2015
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Net operating loss carryforward	$	10,694		$	8,027
Deferred rent		11,570			7,585
Business tax credits		12,558			10,917
Organizational and preopening costs		558			238
Stock-based compensation		1,033			797
Accrued expenses		157			79
Property and equipment		(7,338	)		(7,699	)
Other		984			610
Net deferred tax assets		30,216			20,554
Valuation allowance		(30,216	)		(20,554	)
Total	$	—		$	—

The valuation allowance increased $9.7 million and $2.7 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015. At December 31, 2016, we had $31.3 million in federal net operating loss carryforwards that will begin expiring in 2034, $49.2 million in state net operating loss carryforwards that began expiring in 2016 and $12.6 million in federal business tax credit carryforwards, the majority of which is comprised of FICA tip credit carryforwards that will begin expiring in 2022. These credits and certain state net operating loss carryforwards are also subject to annual limitations due to ownership change rules under the Internal Revenue Code.

The realization of our deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income in future periods. We have analyzed, and will continue to analyze, the positive and negative evidence to support our conclusion regarding the appropriate amount of our valuation allowance. This analysis incorporates our recent earnings history and forecasted future results. We are currently in a three-year cumulative loss which points to a full valuation allowance for our net deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty surrounding their future utilization. The valuation allowance could be reduced in a subsequent period if there is sufficient evidence to support a conclusion that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be realized. Future changes in our valuation allowance could have a material effect on our results of operations in the period recorded.

The unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2015 was $1.7 million. Accruals for unrecognized tax benefits were included within our deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2015, which were offset by a valuation allowance. These accruals related to various tax matters that result from uncertainties in the application of certain income tax regulations. There was no unrecognized tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2016. The full amount of the unrecognized tax benefit at December 31, 2015 decreased during 2016, upon the filing of certain amended state tax returns.  None of the tax benefit impacted the effective tax rate due to the Company’s full valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2016, there was no accrued interest or penalties recorded in the consolidated financial statements.

F-17

KONA GRILL, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state jurisdictions. The earliest tax year still subject to examination by a significant taxing jurisdiction is 2012.

6.     Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock

We are authorized to issue 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01. There were no shares of preferred stock that were issued or outstanding at December 31, 2016 or 2015.

Common Stock

On April 30, 2015, our shareholders approved an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 15 million to 30 million.

Stock Purchase and Retirement Program

In November 2015, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $10.0 million of our outstanding common stock. We completed the stock repurchase authorization in June 2016 and repurchased and retired 832,937 shares at a cost of $10.0 million.

In October 2016, our Board of Directors authorized an additional stock repurchase of up to $5.0 million of outstanding common stock. As of December 31, 2016, we repurchased and retired $1,427,000 or 136,790 shares under the 2016 authorization. We completed the $5 million stock repurchase program in February 2017 with the purchase and retirement of 532,376 shares.

The authorization of the program does not have an expiration date and it does not require us to purchase a specific dollar amount of shares. This authorization may be modified, suspended or terminated at any time. The timing and number of shares purchased pursuant to the share purchase authorization are subject to a number of factors, including current market conditions, legal constraints and available cash. If we do not continue to repurchase shares of our common stock, this could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

Stockholder Rights Plan

On September 6, 2016, our Board of Directors approved the declaration of a dividend of one purchase right (a “Right”) for each outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”). Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a share of preferred stock of the Company (the “Preferred Stock”) at a price of $55.94 per share (the “Purchase Price”), subject to adjustment, under certain conditions specified in the Rights Agreement. Rights will be exercisable only if a person or group acquires 9.9% or more of the Company’s common stock (subject to certain exceptions), and thus becomes an “Acquiring Person” under the Rights Plan. In the event that any person or group of affiliated or associated persons becomes an Acquiring Person, each holder of a Right, other than Rights beneficially owned by the Acquiring Person, affiliates and associates of the Acquiring Person and certain transferees thereof (which will thereupon become null and void), will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise of a Right, for the exercise price of the Right, in lieu of preferred stock, shares of Common Stock of the Company having a market value equal to twice such exercise price. The Rights are not exercisable until the Distribution Date, as defined in the Rights Agreement filed on Form 8-K on September 6, 2016. The Rights will expire on September 6, 2019, unless the Rights are earlier redeemed or exchanged by the Company, or upon the occurrence of certain transactions.

F-18

KONA GRILL, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Common Stock Offering

On June 25, 2014, we completed a public offering of 2,645,000 shares of our common stock at an offering price of $18.50 per share. We sold an aggregate of 2,345,000 shares, of which 345,000 shares were sold pursuant to the underwriters’ exercise of their option to purchase additional shares. The remaining 300,000 shares were sold by certain selling stockholders. The aggregate net proceeds received for the offering totaled $40.9 million, reflecting gross proceeds of $43.4 million, less underwriting discounts and expenses of $2.2 million and other offering costs of $0.3 million. Net proceeds from the offering are being used for new unit expansion, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes.

7.     Stock-Based Compensation

Stock Options

We maintain stock award plans under which we may issue incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, and other types of awards to employees, directors, and consultants. We typically grant non-qualified stock options with an exercise price at the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and such options expire five years from the date of grant. Employee stock options generally vest 25% each year over a four-year period, while annual recurring awards for non-employee director options vest 25% each quarter over a one-year period.

We previously granted stock options under our 2012 Stock Award Plan (the “2012 Plan”). In April 2015, our shareholders approved an increase of 1.5 million common shares reserved for issuance under the 2012 Plan. The total shares of common stock reserved for issuance were 3.7 million, of which 1.4 million shares were available for grant as of December 31, 2016.

We account for stock-based compensation using the fair value recognition provisions. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the vesting term of the option and is included in general and administrative expenses. The following table presents information related to stock-based compensation (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2015		2014
Stock-based compensation	$	1,262	$	1,363	$	856

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and is affected by assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the actual and projected employee stock option exercise behavior, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected dividends, and expected term. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock. The expected term of the options represents the estimated period of time until exercise and is based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option. We have not paid dividends in the past and do not plan to pay any dividends in the near future. Compensation expense is recognized only for those options expected to vest, with forfeitures estimated based on our historical experience and future expectations. The fair value of stock options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

	2016			2015			2014
Expected volatility		45.2	%		40.7	%		36.8	%
Risk-free interest rate		0.9	%		0.9	%		0.7	%
Dividend yield		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Expected life (in years)		3.2			3.0			2.9
Weighted average fair value per option granted	$	4.57		$	6.67		$	4.15

F-19

KONA GRILL, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Activities under our stock award plans during 2016, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:

	Shares Under Option			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding options at December 31, 2013		783,297		$	6.94
Granted		309,900			16.24
Forfeited		(26,650	)		13.08
Exercised		(326,297	)		6.82
Outstanding options at December 31, 2014		740,250			10.66
Granted		380,268			23.28
Forfeited		(81,213	)		19.73
Exercised		(77,837	)		7.40
Outstanding options at December 31, 2015		961,468			15.15
Granted		251,532			14.26
Forfeited		(111,094	)		11.49
Exercised		(127,706	)		6.73
Outstanding options at December 31, 2016		974,200		$	16.44		2.7	$	841,000
Exercisable at December 31, 2016		475,742		$	15.46		2.2	$	690,000

The intrinsic value of options exercised during 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $800,000, $1.2 million and $5.0 million, respectively. The total fair value of shares vested during 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $1.1 million, $1.0 million and $0.7 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, there was approximately $1.8 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.2 years.

Information regarding options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2016 is as follows:

				Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
Range of  Exercise Prices				Shares		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
	$4.99	–	$8.71		180,900		0.9	$	7.94		142,400	$	7.71
	$11.82	–	$18.85		489,582		3.2	$	15.21		199,475	$	15.59
			$23.49		303,718		3.1	$	23.49		133,867	$	23.49
					974,200		2.7	$	16.44		475,742	$	15.46

8.      Employee Benefit Plans

Defined Contribution Plan

We maintain a voluntary defined contribution plan covering eligible employees as defined in the plan documents. Participating employees may elect to defer the receipt of a portion of their compensation, subject to applicable laws, and contribute such amount to one or more investment options. We currently match in cash a certain percentage of the employee contributions to the plan and also pay for related administrative expenses. Matching contributions made during 2016, 2015 and 2014 were $273,000 $263,000 and $216,000, respectively.

F-20

KONA GRILL, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

During 2005, our Board of Directors and stockholders approved the 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) and reserved 425,000 shares of common stock for issuance thereunder. The ESPP permits eligible employees to purchase common stock at a discount through payroll deductions up to 15% of employees’ eligible earnings during the offering period. The purchase price per share at which shares of common stock are sold in an offering under the ESPP is equal to 95% of the fair market value of common stock on the last day of the applicable offering period. During 2016, 2015 and 2014, 4,333 shares, 2,743 shares and 2,298 shares, respectively, were purchased under the ESPP.

9.      Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

We lease our restaurant locations under operating leases having terms expiring from 2017 to 2029. The leases typically include renewal clauses of five years exercisable at the option of our company and rent escalation clauses stipulating specific rent increases. We record deferred rent to recognize rent evenly over the lease term. Certain of these leases require the payment of contingent rentals based on a percentage of gross revenues above specified minimum amounts as defined in the respective lease agreement. The leases typically require us to pay our proportionate share of common area maintenance, property tax, insurance, and other occupancy-related costs. We also lease office facilities and certain equipment under operating lease agreements.

Rent expense on all operating leases was as follows (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		2015		2014
Minimum base rent	$	12,203	$	9,618	$	7,391
Contingent rent		222		269		168
Total rent	$	12,425	$	9,887	$	7,559

As of December 31, 2016, future minimum lease payments under operating leases, including all signed leases for restaurants to be opened and excluding unexercised renewal options periods, were as follows (in thousands):

2017	$	16,110
2018		15,956
2019		15,894
2020		15,400
2021		15,063
Thereafter		55,771
Total minimum lease payments	$	134,194

Litigation

We are engaged in various legal actions, which arise in the ordinary course of our business. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate disposition of these matters, it is the opinion of our management, based upon the information available at this time, that the expected outcome of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or financial condition of our company.

F-21

KONA GRILL, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On December 13, 2012, Frank Neal Goss filed a lawsuit against Kona Grill Macadamia, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Macadamia”) and Anthony DeAngelo in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Kansas City, Missouri. The claim revolves around a fight that Goss and DeAngelo allegedly had outside of the Company’s Kansas City restaurant on March 1, 2011, which is claimed to have resulted in physical injury to the plaintiff. The plaintiff also claims that Macadamia failed to take certain actions that allegedly would have prevented the fight. A default judgment of approximately $3.5 million was entered on December 18, 2013 against Macadamia, but was subsequently set aside by order of the Circuit Court on April 7, 2014. On August 17, 2015, Macadamia filed a Motion for Summary Judgment requesting judgment in its favor on all claims asserted against it by the plaintiff. On August 18, 2015, the plaintiff filed for a voluntary dismissal of the claim without prejudice; however, on April 22, 2016, the plaintiff re-filed the claim in the Circuit Court. The case is proceeding in the Circuit Court and a trial date has been set for June 12, 2017. We believe that we have a strong defense to the claim asserted by the plaintiff and insurance coverage for the claim.

10. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

Summarized quarterly unaudited financial data for 2016 and 2015 is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

	2016
	March 31			June 30			September 30			December 31
Restaurant sales	$	39,277		$	43,296		$	43,358		$	43,592
Income (loss) from operations (2)		(1,578	)		(738	)		(2,411	)		(16,265	)
Net income (loss) (2)		(1,656	)		(835	)		(2,555	)		(16,583	)
Diluted net income (loss) per share (1) (2)	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.24	)	$	(1.58	)

	2015
	March 31			June 30			September 30			December 31
Restaurant sales	$	32,807		$	36,225		$	35,925		$	38,066
Income (loss) from operations		(892	)		(28	)		(1,401	)		(1,953	)
Net income (loss)		(925	)		(93	)		(1,468	)		(2,011	)
Diluted net income (loss) per share (1)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.18	)

(1) Net income (loss) per share calculations for each quarter are based on the weighted average diluted shares outstanding for that quarter and may not total to the full year amount.

(2) During the quarter ended December 31, 2016 we recorded a long-lived asset impairment charge of $12.5 million.

EX-21

Exhibit 21

Kona Grill, Inc.

List of Subsidiaries

Name of Company	State of Incorporation	State(s) of Qualification
Kona Restaurant Holdings, Inc. (1)	Delaware
Kona Macadamia, Inc. (2)	Delaware	Alabama Colorado
		Connecticut
		Florida Georgia
		Hawaii Indiana
		Louisiana
		Ohio
		Michigan
		Missouri
		Nevada
		New Jersey Tennessee
Kona Sushi, Inc. (2)	Arizona	California Idaho Illinois
		Minnesota
		Nebraska
		Virginia
Kona Texas Restaurants, Inc. (2)	Texas
Kona Baltimore, Inc. (3) Kona Grill International Holdings, Inc. (2) Kona Grill International, Inc. (4) Kona Grill Puerto Rico, Inc. (4)	Delaware Delaware Arizona Arizona	Maryland Puerto Rico

(1) Wholly owned subsidiary of Kona Grill, Inc.

(2) Wholly owned subsidiary of Kona Restaurant Holdings, Inc.

(3) Wholly owned subsidiary of Kona Macadamia, Inc.

(4) Wholly owned subsidiary of Kona Grill International Holdings, Inc.

EX-23

Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

Form S-8	No. 333-127593	Kona Grill, Inc. 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Form S-8	No. 333-127594	Kona Grill, Inc. 2005 Stock Award Plan
Form S-8	No. 333-127596	Kona Grill, Inc. 2002 Stock Plan
Form S-8	No. 333-187314	Kona Grill, Inc. 2012 Stock Award Plan
Form S-8	No. 333-206069	Kona Grill, Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Stock Award Plan
Form S-3	No. 333-196039	Registration Statement of Kona Grill, Inc.

of our reports dated March 13, 2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Kona Grill, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Kona Grill, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

March 13, 2017

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Berke Bakay, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Kona Grill, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 13, 2017	/s/ Berke Bakay
	Berke Bakay Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Christi Hing, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Kona Grill, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 13, 2017	/s/ Christi Hing
	Christi Hing Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kona Grill, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Berke Bakay, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Berke Bakay                    

Berke Bakay

Chief Executive Officer

March 13, 2017

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kona Grill, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christi Hing, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Christi Hing                    

Christi Hing

Chief Financial Officer

March 13, 2017

XML

Document And Entity Information - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Feb. 28, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Document Information [Line Items]
Entity Registrant Name	KONA GRILL INC
Entity Central Index Key	0001265572
Trading Symbol	kona
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding (in shares)		10,081,444
Entity Public Float			$ 72.5
Document Type	10-K
Document Period End Date	Dec. 31, 2016
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2016
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Amendment Flag	false

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 3,476	$ 9,055
Investments	178	178
Receivables	1,850	1,574
Inventory	2,176	1,865
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	1,052	774
Total current assets	8,732	13,446
Other assets	1,383	1,146
Property and equipment, net	98,268	87,252
Total assets	108,383	101,844
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accounts payable	4,115	4,548
Accrued expenses	14,450	14,282
Current portion of long term debt	712
Total current liabilities	19,277	18,830
Long term debt	25,921
Deferred rent and other long term liabilities	31,610	20,323
Total liabilities	76,808	39,153
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized; none issued	0	0
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized, 10,568,230 shares issued and 10,452,030 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 11,387,724 shares issued and 11,271,524 shares outstanding at December 31, 2015	106	114
Additional paid-in capital	88,703	98,182
Accumulated deficit	(56,234)	(34,605)
Treasury stock, at cost, 116,200 shares at December 31, 2016 and 2015	(1,000)	(1,000)
Total stockholders’ equity	31,575	62,691
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$ 108,383	$ 101,844

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parentheticals) - $ / shares	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized (in shares)	2,000,000	2,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued (in shares)	0	0
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares)	30,000,000	30,000,000
Common stock, shares issued (in shares)	10,568,230	11,387,724
Common stock, shares outstanding (in shares)	10,452,030	11,271,524
Treasury stock, shares (in shares)	116,200	116,200

XML

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) - USD ($) shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Restaurant sales	$ 169,523	$ 143,023	$ 119,097
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales	45,314	38,803	32,964
Labor	62,027	50,187	40,336
Occupancy	13,754	10,528	8,061
Restaurant operating expenses	24,740	20,293	16,358
General and administrative	13,272	12,612	10,715
Preopening expense	4,533	4,746	2,481
Depreciation and amortization	14,421	9,966	7,220
Asset impairment charge	12,454
Other		161
Total costs and expenses	190,515	147,296	118,135
Income (loss) from operations	(20,992)	(4,273)	962
Write off of deferred financing costs			39
Interest expense, net	571	180	220
Income (loss) before income taxes	(21,563)	(4,453)	703
Income tax expense	66	43
Net income (loss)	$ (21,629)	$ (4,496)	$ 703
Net income (loss) per share (Note 1):
Basic (in dollars per share)	$ (2)	$ (0.40)	$ 0.07
Diluted (in dollars per share)	$ (2)	$ (0.40)	$ 0.07
Weighted average shares outstanding (Note 1):
Basic (in shares)	10,791	11,264	9,870
Diluted (in shares)	10,791	11,264	10,263
Comprehensive income (loss)	$ (21,629)	$ (4,496)	$ 703

XML

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity - USD ($) shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid-in Capital [Member]	Retained Earnings [Member]	Treasury Stock [Member]	Total
Balances (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2013	8,603
Balances at Dec. 31, 2013	$ 87	$ 54,083	$ (30,812)	$ (1,000)	$ 22,358
Stock-based compensation		856			856
Issuance of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of stock options, net of share repurchase for minimum tax withholdings (in shares)	261
Issuance of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of stock options, net of share repurchase for minimum tax withholdings	$ 3	627			630
Issuance of common stock, net of offering expenses (in shares)	2,345
Issuance of common stock, net of offering expenses	$ 23	40,856			40,879
Net income (loss)			703		703
Total comprehensive income (loss)					703
Balances (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2014	11,209
Balances at Dec. 31, 2014	$ 113	96,422	(30,109)	(1,000)	65,426
Total comprehensive income (loss)					703
Stock-based compensation		1,363			1,363
Issuance of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of stock options, net of share repurchase for minimum tax withholdings (in shares)	81
Issuance of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of stock options, net of share repurchase for minimum tax withholdings	$ 1	624			625
Net income (loss)			(4,496)		(4,496)
Total comprehensive income (loss)					(4,496)
Balances (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2015	11,272
Balances at Dec. 31, 2015	$ 114	98,182	(34,605)	(1,000)	62,691
Purchase and retirement of common stock (in shares)	(18)
Purchase and retirement of common stock		(227)			(227)
Purchase and retirement of common stock		227			227
Total comprehensive income (loss)					(4,496)
Stock-based compensation		1,262			1,262
Issuance of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of stock options, net of share repurchase for minimum tax withholdings (in shares)	132
Issuance of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of stock options, net of share repurchase for minimum tax withholdings	$ 1	450			451
Net income (loss)			(21,629)		(21,629)
Total comprehensive income (loss)					(21,629)
Balances (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2016	10,452
Balances at Dec. 31, 2016	$ 106	88,703	(56,234)	(1,000)	31,575
Purchase and retirement of common stock (in shares)	(952)
Purchase and retirement of common stock	$ 9	11,191			11,200
Purchase and retirement of common stock	(9)	(11,191)			(11,200)
Total comprehensive income (loss)					$ (21,629)

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Operating activities
Net income (loss)	$ (21,629,000)	$ (4,496,000)	$ 703,000
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	14,421,000	9,781,000	7,176,000
Stock-based compensation	1,262,000	1,363,000	856,000
Loss on disposal of assets		185,000	44,000
Amortization of deferred financing costs	99,000	81,000	104,000
Write off of deferred financing costs			39,000
Asset Impairment Charges	12,454,000
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables	(275,000)	(1,187,000)	458,000
Inventory	(311,000)	(366,000)	(287,000)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	(164,000)	(69,000)	(336,000)
Accounts payable	564,000	86,000	323,000
Accrued expenses	4,044,000	1,290,000	1,599,000
Deferred rent and other long term liabilities	10,422,000	3,626,000	4,065,000
Net cash provided by operating activities	20,887,000	10,294,000	14,744,000
Investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment	(41,900,000)	(38,077,000)	(21,855,000)
Change in other assets	(133,000)	(138,000)	(3,000)
Net cash used in investing activities	(42,033,000)	(38,215,000)	(21,858,000)
Financing activities
Fees paid for credit facility	(496,000)		(198,000)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance expense			40,879,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of stock options	674,000	625,000	1,466,000
Payment for withholding tax from net settled stock option exercise	(223,000)		(836,000)
Purchase and retirement of common stock	(11,200,000)	(227,000)
Net cash provided by financing activities	15,567,000	398,000	37,811,000
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(5,579,000)	(27,523,000)	30,697,000
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year	9,055,000	36,578,000	5,881,000
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year	3,476,000	9,055,000	36,578,000
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid for interest (net of capitalized interest)	323,000	99,000	161,000
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds	2,000	12,000	110,000
Noncash investing activities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses related to property and equipment purchases	3,258,000	7,266,000	2,060,000
Term Loan [Member]
Financing activities
Borrowings from long term debt	15,000,000
Repayments on long term debt	(188,000)
Revolving Credit Facility [Member]
Financing activities
Borrowings from long term debt	14,500,000
Repayments on long term debt	$ (2,500,000)		$ (3,500,000)

XML

Note 1 - The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure [Text Block]

1.

The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business

Kona Grill, Inc., including its wholly-owned subsidiaries, (referred to herein as the “Company” or “we,” “us,” and “our”) owns and operates upscale casual dining restaurants under the name “Kona Grill.” Our restaurants feature a diverse selection of contemporary American favorites and award-winning sushi items that are prepared fresh daily at each restaurant location. As of

December

31,

2016,

we owned and operated

45

restaurants in

23

states throughout the United States and Puerto Rico. Our chief operating decision maker function is comprised of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer who manage our restaurant operation base that aggregates into

one

reportable segment. Accordingly, we have a single operating segment and reporting unit structure.

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications of prior year’s financial statement amounts have been made to conform to the current year presentation including:

● As of January 1, 2016 we added the additional line item “Inventory” to the consolidated balance sheet. As a result, $1,865,000 was reclassified from “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” to “Inventory” on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015, and

● As of January 1, 2016, the related current portion of debt issuance costs associated with our asset-based revolving credit facility of $113,000 and $82,000 have been reclassified from "Other assets" to "Prepaid expense and other current assets" on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. See further discussion below under " Recently Issued Accounting Standards."

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into cash and have an original maturity of

three

months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Amounts receivable from credit card processors are also considered cash equivalents because they are both short-term and highly liquid in nature and are typically converted to cash within several business days of the sales transaction.

Investments

Investments consist primarily of certificates of deposit that are generally highly liquid in nature. We classify our investments based on the intended holding period.

Inventory

Inventory consists of food and beverage products that are valued at the lower of cost or market using the

first

-in,

first

-out method.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk principally consist of cash and cash equivalents, investments and accounts receivable. Concentration of credit risk is limited by diversifying cash deposits among a variety of high credit-quality issuers. At times, cash and cash equivalent balances

may

be in excess of the FDIC insurance limit.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. We capitalize all direct costs on the construction of leasehold improvements and interest incurred during the construction and development period. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the related lease term that includes reasonably assured lease renewals as determined on the date of acquisition of the leasehold improvement. Improvements that materially extend the life of an asset are capitalized while repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Depreciation and amortization are recorded on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives:

Furniture and fixtures (in years)	5	-	7
Equipment (in years)	2	-	7
Computer software and electronic equipment (in years)		3
Leasehold improvements	Shorter of the useful life or the lease term

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in restaurant operating results indicate that the carrying value of those assets

may

not be recoverable. Factors considered include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; significant negative industry or economic trends; and significant changes in legal factors or in the business climate. The assessment of impairment is performed on a restaurant-by-restaurant basis. Recoverability is assessed by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. This assessment process requires the use of estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows and estimated useful lives, which are subject to a significant degree of judgment. If indicators of impairment are present and if we determine that the carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the restaurant assets, an impairment charge is recorded to reduce the carrying value of the asset to its fair value.

As a result of the process described above, we recorded long-lived asset impairment charge of

$12.5

million, for the year ended

December

 

31,

2016.

Such amounts are included in "Asset impairment charge" in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss) (Note

2).

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that is determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, a

three

-tier value hierarchy was established, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value.

Level 1: Fair values determined by quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access.

Level 2: Fair values utilize inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.

Level 3: Fair values determined by unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data and may reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The carrying value for certain of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates fair value because of their short-term nature. Our investments represent certificates of deposit and are considered available-for-sale securities that are valued using market observable inputs (Level

2).

Our long-term debt, when incurred, is valued using primarily Level

2

inputs including current applicable rates for similar instruments and approximates the carrying value of such obligations.

In addition to our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, we are required by GAAP to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis after initial recognition. Generally, assets, liabilities and reporting units are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as a result of impairment reviews and any resulting impairment charge. In connection with our impairment review of long-lived assets described in Note

2,

we measured the fair value of our asset groups that were not deemed recoverable, based on Level

3

inputs consisting of the discounted future cash flows associated with the use and eventual disposition of the asset group. The discounted cash flow method is based on Level

3

inputs consisting primarily of our restaurant forecasts and utilizes forward-looking assumptions and projections, as well as factors impacting long-range plans such as pricing, discount rates and commodity prices.

Leases

We lease our restaurant locations under operating lease agreements with initial terms of approximately

10

to

20

 years. Most of these agreements require minimum annual rent payments plus contingent rent payments based on a percentage of restaurant sales which exceed the minimum base sales threshold. Contingent rent payments, to the extent they exceed minimum payments, are accrued over the periods in which the liability is incurred. Rent expense associated with these contingent payments is recorded prior to the achievement of specified sales levels if exceeding such amount is considered probable and is estimable. The lease agreements typically also require scheduled increases to minimum annual rent payments. For leases that contain rent escalations, we record the total rent payable over the initial lease term, starting on the date we gain possession of the property (including the construction period), on a straight-line basis. Any difference between minimum rent and straight-line rent is recorded as deferred rent. Deferred rent also includes

tenant

improvement allowances which are amortized as a reduction of rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. As part of the initial lease terms, we negotiate with our landlords to secure these

tenant

improvement allowances and record such allowances as lease incentive receivables when determined to be collectible. These amounts are included in receivables on the balance sheet.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues from food, beverage, and alcohol sales are recognized when payment is

tendered

at the point of sale. Restaurant sales are recorded net of promotions and discounts. Revenues from gift card sales are recognized upon redemption. Prior to redemption, the outstanding balances of all gift cards are included in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

In

February

and

April

2016,

we entered into franchise agreements for the development of

six

Kona Grill restaurants in Mexico and

six

restaurants in the United Arab Emirates. Territory and franchise fees received in conjunction with these agreements are recorded as deferred revenue and included in “Deferred rent and other long term liabilities” in our consolidated balance sheets. Territory fees are recognized as income on a pro-rata basis at the same time the individual franchise fees for each location are considered earned, typically when the individual franchise unit is opened. We have

not

recognized any franchise related income for the year ended

December

31,

2016.

Sales Taxes

Revenues are presented net of sales taxes. The sales tax obligation is included in accrued expenses until the taxes are remitted to the appropriate taxing authorities.

Advertising and Marketing Costs

Advertising and marketing costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising and marketing expense for

2016,

2015

and

2014

was

$935,000,

$744,000

and

$461,000,

respectively, and is included in restaurant operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). We maintain a customer loyalty club (the Konavore™ program), an email-based marketing program designed to communicate new menu offerings, restaurant specific events, and other marketing messages to keep Kona Grill top of mind for consumers. The Konavore™ loyalty program offers members a discount coupon upon enrolling in the program and a discount coupon for a member’s birthday. These coupons are recognized upon redemption and recorded in the financial statements as a sales discount. Costs associated with the redemption of a promotion in the form of a coupon for discounted product are recorded in cost of sales as these coupons are typically redeemed with the purchase of additional food and beverage items. Costs associated with promotional giveaways of food and beverages to local businesses and sponsorship of events are viewed as advertising in nature and recorded in restaurant operating expenses.

Preopening Expense

Costs directly related to the opening of new restaurants, including employee relocation, travel, employee payroll and related training costs, and rent expense subsequent to the date we take possession of the property through the restaurant opening are expensed as incurred.

Stock-Based Compensation

We maintain stock award plans under which we

may

issue incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, and other types of awards to employees, directors, and consultants. Stock options issued under these plans are granted with an exercise price at or above the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and expire

five

years from the date of grant. Employee stock options generally vest

25%

each year over a

four

-year period, while annual recurring awards for non-employee director options vest

25%

each quarter over a

one

-year period. Certain stock option awards for executive officers

may

vest earlier in the event of a change of control or termination, as defined in the executive officer’s employment agreement. We apply the Black-Scholes valuation model in determining the fair value of stock option grants. We recognize compensation cost for our stock awards using a graded vesting schedule on a straight line basis over the requisite service period.

Income Taxes

We utilize the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed at each balance sheet date for temporary differences between the consolidated financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on tax rates in effect in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts that will more likely than not be realized.

We recognize the impact of a tax position in our financial statements if that position more likely than not will be sustained upon examination by a tax authority. We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense.

Net Income

(Loss)

Per Share

Basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss) per share is computed similarly except that weighted average common shares is increased to reflect all dilutive instruments, including stock options. The dilutive effects of the dilutive securities are calculated using the treasury stock method and only those instruments that result in a reduction in income per share are included in the calculation. For

2016,

2015

and

2014,

there were

790,000,

608,000

and

197,000

stock options outstanding, respectively, that were not included in the dilutive earnings per share calculation because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:

	Year Ended December 31,
	201 6			201 5			201 4
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	(21,629	)	$	(4,496	)	$	703
Denominator:
Weighted average shares — basic		10,791			11,264			9,870
Effect of dilutive stock options		—			—			393
Weighted average shares — diluted		10,791			11,264			10,263
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(2.00	)	$	(0.40	)	$	0.07
Diluted	$	(2.00	)	$	(0.40	)	$	0.07

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In

May

2014,

the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)

2014

-

09,

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic

606)

. The pronouncement was issued to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and is effective for reporting periods beginning after

December

15,

2017.

We are currently performing an assessment of the revised standard and impacts on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures. To date, we have reviewed a sample of contracts that are representative of the current types of revenue generating streams. We are still in the process of completing our assessment of the impacts, including the potential impacts on variable consideration on royalty income received from franchise sales; however, based on the initial assessment we do not expect it to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements, and based on preliminary findings, we do not expect these areas to have an impact on revenue recognition. We expect to have an update to the impacts of the standard in the

second

quarter of

2017.

We anticipate adopting the new standard effective

January

1,

2018.

The guidance

may

be applied retrospectively for all periods presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application. We currently anticipate adopting the standard retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the amended guidance recognized at

January

1,

2018.

In

April

2015,

the FASB issued ASU

2015

-

03,

Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic

835

-

30):

Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs

. This guidance requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of that debt liability. However, the guidance in ASU

2015

-

15,

issued in

August

2015,

Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements

, prescribes that deferred initial up-front commitment fees paid by a borrower to a lender represent the benefit of being able to access capital over the contractual term, and therefore, meet the definition of an asset, while debt issuance costs in the scope of ASU

2015

-

03

do not. As such, the Company will continue to present the costs associated with its asset-based revolving credit facility as an asset. Debt issuance costs associated with our asset-based revolving credit facility of

$539,000

as of

December

31,

2016

are included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other assets in the consolidated balance sheet, while debt issuance costs of

$180,000

associated with our term loan are netted against the outstanding debt.

In

April

2015,

the FASB issued ASU No.

2015

-

05,

Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic

350

-

40)

. The pronouncement was issued to provide guidance concerning accounting for fees in a cloud computing arrangement. We have elected to adopt the guidance prospectively. The adoption of ASU

2015

-

05

did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In

February

2016,

ASC Topic

842,

Leases

, was issued to increase the transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. In order to meet that objective, the new standard requires recognition of the assets and liabilities that arise from leases. Accordingly, a lessee will recognize a right-of-use (ROU) asset for its right to use the underlying asset and a lease liability for the corresponding lease obligation. Both the ROU asset and lease liability will initially be measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term. Subsequent measurement, including the presentation of expenses and cash flows, will depend on the classification of the lease as either finance or an operating lease. Initial costs directly attributable to negotiating and arranging the lease will be included in the ROU asset. Lessees can make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize a ROU asset and corresponding lease liability for leases with a term of

12

months or less. Accounting by lessors will remain largely unchanged from current U.S. GAAP. In transition, lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients that companies

may

elect to apply. These practical expedients relate to the identification and classification of leases that commenced before the effective date, initial direct costs for leases that commenced before the effective date, and the ability to use hindsight in evaluating lessee options to extend or terminate a lease or to purchase the underlying asset. The transition guidance also provides specific guidance for sale and leaseback transactions, build-to-suit leases, leveraged leases, and amounts previously recognized in accordance with the business combinations guidance for leases. The new standard is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after

December

15,

2018,

and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The expected adoption method is being evaluated by us. We expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In

March

2016,

the FASB issued ASU

2016

-

09,

Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic

718)

which simplifies the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after

December

15,

2016,

and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The company will adopt this standard effective

January

1,

2017.

We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In

August

2016,

the FASB issued ASU

2016

-

15,

Statement of Cash Flows – Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments

as stakeholders indicated that there is diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic

230,

Statement of Cash Flows, and other Topics. This ASU addressed

eight

specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after

December

15,

2017,

and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The amendments should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. We will adopt this standard effective

January

1,

2017

noting it will not have any impact on the way we report items within our statement of cash flows.

XML

Note 2 - Property and Equipment

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure [Text Block]

2

.       Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	201 6			201 5
Leasehold improvements	$	115,902		$	96,473
Equipment		29,900			25,825
Furniture and fixtures		12,196			11,126
		157,998			133,424
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(62,921	)		(54,027	)
		95,077			79,397
Construction in progress		3,191			7,855
Total property and equipment, net	$	98,268		$	87,252

We capitalize direct internal payroll and travel costs on the construction of leasehold improvements incurred during the construction and development period. Capitalized costs were

$1,318,000

and

$774,000

in

2016

and

2015,

respectively.

We review the carrying value of our long-lived assets on a restaurant-by-restaurant basis when indicators of potential impairment exist. Such indicators include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to expected, historical or projected future operating results; significant negative industry or economic trends; and significant changes in laws and regulations. Given the continued underperformance of certain restaurants we determined impairment indicators were present as of

December

31,

2016.

As such, we conducted additional impairment analyses and performed a recoverability test which ultimately concluded the property and equipment of

five

restaurants were impaired.

During the year ended

December

31,

2016,

we recorded non-cash asset impairment charges of

$12.5

million for

five

underperforming restaurants based upon an assessment of each restaurant’s historical operating performance combined with expected cash flows for these restaurants over the respective remaining lease term. We reduced the carrying value of these assets to their estimated fair value which was determined using a discounted cash flow model or the market value of each restaurant’s assets. The fair values of each of the reporting units as well as the related assets and liabilities utilized to determine the impairment were measured using Level

2

and Level

3

inputs as described in Note

2.

This impairment charge was recorded to asset impairment charge in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss).

While, we do not intend to close any of these underperforming restaurants at this time, we will continue to evaluate each of these restaurants on a case-by-case basis. Additionally, while we believe that our estimates of fair value are appropriate, we will continue to monitor these asset values of each individual restaurant.  Additionally, should actual values differ materially from our estimates, we

may

be required to record impairment charges in the future.

XML

Note 3 - Accrued Expenses

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities Disclosure [Text Block]

3

.   Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	201 6		201 5
Accrued payroll and benefits	$	4,549	$	3,786
Gift cards		4,311		2,309
Accrued construction and remodel (1)		2,005		5,017
Sales and use taxes		1,776		1,678
Business and income taxes		563		321
Accrued occupancy		240		296
Other		1,006		875
Total accrued expenses	$	14,450	$	14,282

(1) Balance is attributable to property additions for our new restaurants and remodels.

XML

Note 4 - Debt and Credit Agreements

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Debt Disclosure [Text Block]

4

.     Debt and Credit Agreements

On

April

19,

2013,

we entered into a Credit Agreement for a

$20

million revolving line of credit maturing on

April

19,

2017

with KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”) and Stearns Bank National Association (“Stearns Bank”). On

November

7,

2014,

we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amended Credit Agreement”) with KeyBank to (i) increase the credit facility from

$20

million to

$35

million, and (ii) extend the maturity date of the credit facility to

November

7,

2019.

On

October

12,

2016,

we entered into the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Second Amended Credit Agreement”) with KeyBank and Zions First National Bank to (i) increase the credit facility from

$35

million to

$60

million, comprised of a

$45

million revolver (“Revolver”) and

$15

million term loan (“Term Loan”), and (ii) extend the maturity date of the credit facility to

October

12,

2021.

The credit facility is secured by our personal property and assets. Certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries have also guaranteed the credit facility.

		December 31, 2016							December 31, 2015
	Maturity Date	Unamortized Deferred Financing Costs (a)		Fair Value of Debt (b)		Carrying Value of Debt			Carrying Value of Debt
Revolver	Oct. 2021	$	539	$	12,000	$	12,000		$	-
Term Loan	Oct. 2021		180		14,813		14,813			-
Total debt		$	719	$	26,813		26,813			-
Debt issuance costs presented with debt (a)							(180	)		-
Total debt, net							26,633
Less: current portion							712
Long term debt						$	25,921		$	-

(a) We have presented the deferred financing costs associated with the Term Loan in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability as of December 31, 2016. The deferred financing costs related to the Revolver continue to be presented as an asset, and are included in both Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other assets on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

(b) Our Revolver and Term Loan bear interest at rates commensurate with market rates and therefore their respective carrying values approximate fair value.

The interest rate under the Second Amended Credit Agreement is KeyBank’s base rate or LIBOR, at our option, plus an applicable margin depending on our leverage ratio. The LIBOR margins range from

1.75%

to

2.75%

and the base rate margins range from

0.75%

to

1.75%.

Payments on the Term Loan are due quarterly and subject to acceleration upon certain events as defined in the Second Amended Credit Agreement, while borrowings on the Revolver are interest only, payable quarterly with respect to each base rate loan and at varying times with respect to LIBOR rate loans, with outstanding principal and interest due at maturity. Prepayment is permitted at any time without penalty, subject to certain restrictions on the order of repayment or prepayment. We are obligated to pay a commitment fee at an annual rate of

0.175%

to

0.350%,

depending on our leverage ratio, times the unused total revolving commitment of the credit facility based on the average daily amount outstanding under the credit facility for the previous quarter. The commitment fee is payable quarterly in arrears.

At

December

31,

2016

we had

$26.8

million in outstanding borrowings and

$33.2

million available under the credit facility, subject to compliance with certain covenants. We incurred gross interest expense of

$572,000,

$184,000

and

$269,000

during the year ended

December

31,

2016,

2015

and

2014,

respectively. Capitalized interest was

$178,000

for the year ended

December

31,

2016.

We did not capitalize any interest for the years ended

December

31,

2015

and

2014.

Our current projections indicate that we will maintain the outstanding borrowings for the next

12

months and, as a result, all borrowings under the credit facility are classified as long-term debt, except for the quarterly amortization payments for the Term Loan which are classified as current portion of long term debt.

The required principal payments for all borrowings for each of the

five

years following the balance sheet date are as follows (in thousands):

2017	$	750
2018		844
2019		1,125
2020		1,219
2021		22,875
Thereafter		—
Total	$	26,813

The credit facility also requires us to comply with certain covenants on a quarterly basis, including (a) a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than

1.50

and (b) a maximum leverage ratio of

4.25

to

1.0

through the maturity date. We were in compliance with all covenants at

December

31,

2016.

We

may

from time to time request that the total revolving credit commitment under the Second Amended Credit Agreement be increased up to an amount not to exceed

$85

million. Any such increase is subject to agreement of the respective lenders in the lending syndicate or new lenders in certain circumstances. Any such increase, which

may

be for a lesser amount than requested by us, is also subject to certain other terms and conditions as provided in the Second Amended Credit Agreement.

Subsequent to

December

31,

2016,

we borrowed an additional

$8

million on the Credit Facility to fund working capital and the share repurchase program. 

There is a high likelihood that we will not be in compliance with the leverage ratio requirement at

March

31,

2017.

  As a result, we have engaged KeyBank, as lead bank, to enter into an amendment of the Credit Facility by

March

31,

2017.

We believe it is probable that an amendment will be executed and we will be in compliance with all covenants at

March

31,

2017.

However, in the event that we do not enter into any amendment as expected by

March

31,

2017,

we will be in default of our covenants and the lenders have various remedies which would materially affect our financial condition.

XML

Note 5 - Income Taxes

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block]

5

.     Income Taxes

Income tax expense (benefit) consisted of the following (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	201 6		201 5		201 4
Current:
Federal	$	—	$	—	$	—
State		66		43		—
		66		43		—
Deferred:
Federal		—		—		—
State		—		—		—
		—		—		—
Total	$	66	$	43	$	—

Income tax expense (benefit) differed from amounts computed by applying the federal statutory rate to income (loss) from operations before provision for income taxes as follows (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	201 6			201 5			201 4
Income tax expense (benefit) at federal statutory rate of 34%	$	(7,331	)	$	(1,514	)	$	239
State income taxes, net of federal benefit		(1,382	)		46			41
Nondeductible expenses		701			583			484
Business tax credit		(1,692	)		(1,503	)		(1,959	)
Other		108			(273	)		(32	)
Change in valuation allowance		9,662			2,704	)		1,227
Total	$	66		$	43		$	—

The temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2016			201 5
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Net operating loss carryforward	$	10,694		$	8,027
Deferred rent		11,570			7,585
Business tax credits		12,558			10,917
Organizational and preopening costs		558			238
Stock-based compensation		1,033			797
Accrued expenses		157			79
Property and equipment		(7,338	)		(7,699	)
Other		984			610
Net deferred tax assets		30,216			20,554
Valuation allowance		(30,216	)		(20,554	)
Total	$	—		$	—

The valuation allowance increased

$9.7

million and

$2.7

million at

December

31,

2016

and

2015.

At

December

31,

2016,

we had

$31.3

million in federal net operating loss carryforwards that will begin expiring in

2034,

$49.2

million in state net operating loss carryforwards that began expiring in

2016

and

$12.6

million in federal business tax credit carryforwards, the majority of which is comprised of FICA tip credit carryforwards that will begin expiring in

2022.

These credits and certain state net operating loss carryforwards are also subject to annual limitations due to ownership change rules under the Internal Revenue Code.

The realization of our deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income in future periods. We have analyzed, and will continue to analyze, the positive and negative evidence to support our conclusion regarding the appropriate amount of our valuation allowance. This analysis incorporates our recent earnings history and forecasted future results. We are currently in a

three

-year cumulative loss which points to a full valuation allowance for our net deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty surrounding their future utilization. The valuation allowance could be reduced in a subsequent period if there is sufficient evidence to support a conclusion that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be realized. Future changes in our valuation allowance could have a material effect on our results of operations in the period recorded.

The unrecognized tax benefits as of

December

31,

2015

was

$1.7

million. Accruals for unrecognized tax benefits were included within our deferred tax assets as of

December

31,

2015,

which were offset by a valuation allowance. These accruals related to various tax matters that result from uncertainties in the application of certain income tax regulations. There was

no

unrecognized tax benefit for the year ended

December

31,

2016.

 The full amount of the unrecognized tax benefit at

December

31,

2015

decreased during

2016,

upon the filing of certain amended state tax returns.  None of the tax benefit impacted the effective tax rate due to the Company’s full valuation allowance. As of

December

31,

2016,

there was

no

accrued interest or penalties recorded in the consolidated financial statements.

We are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state jurisdictions. The earliest tax year still subject to examination by a significant taxing jurisdiction is

2012.

XML

Note 6 - Stockholders' Equity

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Stockholders' Equity Note Disclosure [Text Block]

6

.     Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock

We are authorized to issue

2,000,000

 shares of preferred stock with a par value of

$0.01.

There were

no

shares of preferred stock that were issued or outstanding at

December

31,

2016

or

2015.

Common Stock

On

April

30,

2015,

our shareholders approved an amendment to our certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from

15

million to

30

million.

Stock Purchase and Retirement Program

In

November

2015,

our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to

$10.0

million of our outstanding common stock. We completed the stock repurchase authorization in

June

2016

and repurchased and retired

832,937

shares at a cost of

$10.0

million.

In

October

2016,

our Board of Directors authorized an additional stock repurchase of up to

$5.0

million of outstanding common stock. As of

December

31,

2016,

we repurchased and retired

$1,427,000

or

136,790

shares under the

2016

authorization. We completed the

$5

million stock repurchase program in

February

2017

with the purchase and retirement of

532,376

shares.

The authorization of the program does not have an expiration date and it does not require us to purchase a specific dollar amount of shares. This authorization

may

be modified, suspended or terminated at any time. The timing and number of shares purchased pursuant to the share purchase authorization are subject to a number of factors, including current market conditions, legal constraints and available cash. If we do not continue to repurchase shares of our common stock, this could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

Stockholder Rights Plan

On

September

6,

2016,

our Board of Directors approved the declaration of a dividend of

one

purchase right (a “Right”) for each outstanding share of common stock, par value

$0.01

per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”). Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company

one

one

-thousandth of a share of preferred stock of the Company (the “Preferred Stock”) at a price of

$55.94

per share (the “Purchase Price”), subject to adjustment, under certain conditions specified in the Rights Agreement. Rights will be exercisable only if a person or group acquires

9.9%

or more of the Company’s common stock (subject to certain exceptions), and thus becomes an “Acquiring Person” under the Rights Plan. In the event that any person or group of affiliated or associated persons becomes an Acquiring Person, each holder of a Right, other than Rights beneficially owned by the Acquiring Person, affiliates and associates of the Acquiring Person and certain transferees thereof (which will thereupon become null and void), will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise of a Right, for the exercise price of the Right, in lieu of preferred stock, shares of Common Stock of the Company having a market value equal to twice such exercise price. The Rights are not exercisable until the Distribution Date, as defined in the Rights Agreement filed on Form

8

-K on

September

6,

2016.

The Rights will expire on

September

6,

2019,

unless the Rights are earlier redeemed or exchanged by the Company, or upon the occurrence of certain transactions.

Common Stock Offering

On

June

25,

2014,

we completed a public offering of

2,645,000

shares of our common stock at an offering price of

$18.50

per share. We sold an aggregate of

2,345,000

shares, of which

345,000

shares were sold pursuant to the underwriters’ exercise of their option to purchase additional shares. The remaining

300,000

shares were sold by certain selling stockholders. The aggregate net proceeds received for the offering totaled

$40.9

million, reflecting gross proceeds of

$43.4

million, less underwriting discounts and expenses of

$2.2

million and other offering costs of

$0.3

million. Net proceeds from the offering are being used for new unit expansion, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes.

XML

Note 7 - Stock-based Compensation

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Text Block]

7

.     Stock-Based Compensation

Stock Options

We maintain stock award plans under which we

may

issue incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, and other types of awards to employees, directors, and consultants. We typically grant non-qualified stock options with an exercise price at the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and such options expire

five

years from the date of grant. Employee stock options generally vest

25%

each year over a

four

-year period, while annual recurring awards for non-employee director options vest

25%

each quarter over a

one

-year period.

We previously granted stock options under our

2012

Stock Award Plan (the

“2012

Plan”). In

April

2015,

our shareholders approved an increase of

1.5

million common shares reserved for issuance under the

2012

Plan. The total shares of common stock reserved for issuance were

3.7

million, of which

1.4

million shares were available for grant as of

December

31,

2016.

We account for stock-based compensation using the fair value recognition provisions. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the vesting term of the option and is included in general and administrative expenses. The following table presents information related to stock-based compensation (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	201 6		201 5		201 4
Stock-based compensation	$	1,262	$	1,363	$	856

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and is affected by assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the actual and projected employee stock option exercise behavior, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected dividends, and expected term. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock. The expected term of the options represents the estimated period of time until exercise and is based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior.

The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option. We have not paid dividends in the past and do not plan to pay any dividends in the near future.

Compensation expense is recognized only for those options expected to vest, with forfeitures estimated based on our historical experience and future expectations. The fair value of stock options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

	201 6			201 5			201 4
Expected volatility		45.2	%		40.7	%		36.8	%
Risk-free interest rate		0.9	%		0.9	%		0.7	%
Dividend yield		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Expected life (in years)		3.2			3.0			2.9
Weighted average fair value per option granted	$	4.57		$	6.67		$	4.15

Activities under our stock award plans during

2016,

2015

and

2014

were as follows:

	Shares Under Option			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding options at December 31, 2013		783,297		$	6.94
Granted		309,900			16.24
Forfeited		(26,650	)		13.08
Exercised		(326,297	)		6.82
Outstanding options at December 31, 2014		740,250			10.66
Granted		380,268			23.28
Forfeited		(81,213	)		19.73
Exercised		(77,837	)		7.40
Outstanding options at December 31, 2015		961,468			15.15
Granted		251,532			14.26
Forfeited		(111,094	)		11.49
Exercised		(127,706	)		6.73
Outstanding options at December 31, 2016		974,200		$	16.44		2.7	$	841,000
Exercisable at December 31, 2016		475,742		$	15.46		2.2	$	690,000

The intrinsic value of options exercised during

2016,

2015

and

2014

was

$800,000,

$1.2

million and

$5.0

million, respectively. The total fair value of shares vested during

2016,

2015

and

2014

was

$1.1

million,

$1.0

million and

$0.7

million, respectively. As of

December

31,

2016,

there was approximately

$1.8

million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of

2.2

years.

Information regarding options outstanding and exercisable at

December

 

31,

2016

is as follows:

				Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
Range of  Exercise Prices				Shares		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
	$4.99	–	$8.71		180,900		0.9	$	7.94		142,400	$	7.71
	$11.82	–	$18.85		489,582		3.2	$	15.21		199,475	$	15.59
			$23.49		303,718		3.1	$	23.49		133,867	$	23.49
					974,200		2.7	$	16.44		475,742	$	15.46

XML

Note 8 - Employee Benefit Plans

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Disclosure [Text Block]

8

.      Employee Benefit Plans

Defined Contribution Plan

We maintain a voluntary defined contribution plan covering eligible employees as defined in the plan documents. Participating employees

may

elect to defer the receipt of a portion of their compensation, subject to applicable laws, and contribute such amount to

one

or more investment options. We currently match in cash a certain percentage of the employee contributions to the plan and also pay for related administrative expenses. Matching contributions made during

2016,

2015

and

2014

were

$273,000

$263,000

and

$216,000,

respectively.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

During

2005,

our Board of Directors and stockholders approved the

2005

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) and reserved

425,000

 shares of common stock for issuance thereunder. The ESPP permits eligible employees to purchase common stock at a discount through payroll deductions up to

15%

of employees’ eligible earnings during the offering period. The purchase price per share at which shares of common stock are sold in an offering under the ESPP is equal to

95%

of the fair market value of common stock on the last day of the applicable offering period. During

2016,

2015

and

2014,

4,333

shares,

2,743

shares and

2,298

shares, respectively, were purchased under the ESPP.

XML

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]

9

.

     Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

We lease our restaurant locations under operating leases having terms expiring from

2017

to

2029.

The leases typically include renewal clauses of

five

years exercisable at the option of our company and rent escalation clauses stipulating specific rent increases. We record deferred rent to recognize rent evenly over the lease term. Certain of these leases require the payment of contingent rentals based on a percentage of gross revenues above specified minimum amounts as defined in the respective lease agreement. The leases typically require us to pay our proportionate share of common area maintenance, property tax, insurance, and other occupancy-related costs. We also lease office facilities and certain equipment under operating lease agreements.

Rent expense on all operating leases was as follows (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		201 5		201 4
Minimum base rent	$	12,203	$	9,618	$	7,391
Contingent rent		222		269		168
Total rent	$	12,425	$	9,887	$	7,559

As of

December

31,

2016,

future minimum lease payments under operating leases, including all signed leases for restaurants to be opened and excluding unexercised renewal options periods, were as follows (in thousands):

2017	$	16,110
2018		15,956
2019		15,894
2020		15,400
2021		15,063
Thereafter		55,771
Total minimum lease payments	$	134,194

Litigation

We are engaged in various legal actions, which arise in the ordinary course of our business. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate disposition of these matters, it is the opinion of our management, based upon the information available at this time, that the expected outcome of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or financial condition of our company.

On

December

13,

2012,

Frank Neal Goss filed a lawsuit against Kona Grill Macadamia, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Macadamia”) and Anthony DeAngelo in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Kansas City, Missouri. The claim revolves around a fight that Goss and DeAngelo allegedly had outside of the Company’s Kansas City restaurant on

March

1,

2011,

which is claimed to have resulted in physical injury to the plaintiff. The plaintiff also claims that Macadamia failed to take certain actions that allegedly would have prevented the fight. A default judgment of approximately

$3.5

million was entered on

December

18,

2013

against Macadamia, but was subsequently set aside by order of the Circuit Court on

April

7,

2014.

On

August

17,

2015,

Macadamia filed a Motion for Summary Judgment requesting judgment in its favor on all claims asserted against it by the plaintiff. On

August

18,

2015,

the plaintiff filed for a voluntary dismissal of the claim without prejudice; however, on

April

22,

2016,

the plaintiff re-filed the claim in the Circuit Court. The case is proceeding in the Circuit Court and a trial date has been set for

June

12,

2017.

We believe that we have a strong defense to the claim asserted by the plaintiff and insurance coverage for the claim.

XML

Note 10 - Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes to Financial Statements

Quarterly Financial Information [Text Block]

1

0

. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

Summarized quarterly unaudited financial data for

2016

and

2015

is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

	201 6
	March 31			June 30			September 30			December 31
Restaurant sales	$	39,277		$	43,296		$	43,358		$	43,592
Income (loss) from operations (2 )		(1,578	)		(738	)		(2,411	)		(16,265	)
Net income (loss) (2 )		(1,656	)		(835	)		(2,555	)		(16,583	)
Diluted net income (loss) per share (1) (2 )	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.24	)	$	(1.58	)

	2015
	March 31			June 30			September 30			December 31
Restaurant sales	$	32,807		$	36,225		$	35,925		$	38,066
Income (loss) from operations		(892	)		(28	)		(1,401	)		(1,953	)
Net income (loss)		(925	)		(93	)		(1,468	)		(2,011	)
Diluted net income (loss) per share (1)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.18	)

(1) Net income (loss) per share calculations for each quarter are based on the weighted average diluted shares outstanding for that quarter and may not total to the full year amount.

(2) During the quarter ended December 31, 2016 we recorded a long-lived asset impairment charge of $12.5 million.

XML

Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications of prior year’s financial statement amounts have been made to conform to the current year presentation including:

● As of January 1, 2016 we added the additional line item “Inventory” to the consolidated balance sheet. As a result, $1,865,000 was reclassified from “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” to “Inventory” on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015, and

● As of January 1, 2016, the related current portion of debt issuance costs associated with our asset-based revolving credit facility of $113,000 and $82,000 have been reclassified from "Other assets" to "Prepaid expense and other current assets" on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. See further discussion below under " Recently Issued Accounting Standards."

Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into cash and have an original maturity of

three

months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Amounts receivable from credit card processors are also considered cash equivalents because they are both short-term and highly liquid in nature and are typically converted to cash within several business days of the sales transaction.

Investment, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Investments

Investments consist primarily of certificates of deposit that are generally highly liquid in nature. We classify our investments based on the intended holding period.

Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Inventory

Inventory consists of food and beverage products that are valued at the lower of cost or market using the

first

-in,

first

-out method.

Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk principally consist of cash and cash equivalents, investments and accounts receivable. Concentration of credit risk is limited by diversifying cash deposits among a variety of high credit-quality issuers. At times, cash and cash equivalent balances

may

be in excess of the FDIC insurance limit.

Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. We capitalize all direct costs on the construction of leasehold improvements and interest incurred during the construction and development period. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the related lease term that includes reasonably assured lease renewals as determined on the date of acquisition of the leasehold improvement. Improvements that materially extend the life of an asset are capitalized while repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Depreciation and amortization are recorded on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives:

Furniture and fixtures (in years)	5	-	7
Equipment (in years)	2	-	7
Computer software and electronic equipment (in years)		3
Leasehold improvements	Shorter of the useful life or the lease term

Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in restaurant operating results indicate that the carrying value of those assets

may

not be recoverable. Factors considered include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; significant negative industry or economic trends; and significant changes in legal factors or in the business climate. The assessment of impairment is performed on a restaurant-by-restaurant basis. Recoverability is assessed by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. This assessment process requires the use of estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows and estimated useful lives, which are subject to a significant degree of judgment. If indicators of impairment are present and if we determine that the carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the restaurant assets, an impairment charge is recorded to reduce the carrying value of the asset to its fair value.

As a result of the process described above, we recorded long-lived asset impairment charge of

$12.5

million, for the year ended

December

 

31,

2016.

Such amounts are included in "Asset impairment charge" in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss) (Note

2).

Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that is determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, a

three

-tier value hierarchy was established, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair value.

Level 1: Fair values determined by quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access.

Level 2: Fair values utilize inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.

Level 3: Fair values determined by unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data and may reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The carrying value for certain of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates fair value because of their short-term nature. Our investments represent certificates of deposit and are considered available-for-sale securities that are valued using market observable inputs (Level

2).

Our long-term debt, when incurred, is valued using primarily Level

2

inputs including current applicable rates for similar instruments and approximates the carrying value of such obligations.

In addition to our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, we are required by GAAP to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis after initial recognition. Generally, assets, liabilities and reporting units are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as a result of impairment reviews and any resulting impairment charge. In connection with our impairment review of long-lived assets described in Note

2,

we measured the fair value of our asset groups that were not deemed recoverable, based on Level

3

inputs consisting of the discounted future cash flows associated with the use and eventual disposition of the asset group. The discounted cash flow method is based on Level

3

inputs consisting primarily of our restaurant forecasts and utilizes forward-looking assumptions and projections, as well as factors impacting long-range plans such as pricing, discount rates and commodity prices.

Lease, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Leases

We lease our restaurant locations under operating lease agreements with initial terms of approximately

10

to

20

 years. Most of these agreements require minimum annual rent payments plus contingent rent payments based on a percentage of restaurant sales which exceed the minimum base sales threshold. Contingent rent payments, to the extent they exceed minimum payments, are accrued over the periods in which the liability is incurred. Rent expense associated with these contingent payments is recorded prior to the achievement of specified sales levels if exceeding such amount is considered probable and is estimable. The lease agreements typically also require scheduled increases to minimum annual rent payments. For leases that contain rent escalations, we record the total rent payable over the initial lease term, starting on the date we gain possession of the property (including the construction period), on a straight-line basis. Any difference between minimum rent and straight-line rent is recorded as deferred rent. Deferred rent also includes

tenant

improvement allowances which are amortized as a reduction of rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. As part of the initial lease terms, we negotiate with our landlords to secure these

tenant

improvement allowances and record such allowances as lease incentive receivables when determined to be collectible. These amounts are included in receivables on the balance sheet.

Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Revenue Recognition

Revenues from food, beverage, and alcohol sales are recognized when payment is

tendered

at the point of sale. Restaurant sales are recorded net of promotions and discounts. Revenues from gift card sales are recognized upon redemption. Prior to redemption, the outstanding balances of all gift cards are included in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

In

February

and

April

2016,

we entered into franchise agreements for the development of

six

Kona Grill restaurants in Mexico and

six

restaurants in the United Arab Emirates. Territory and franchise fees received in conjunction with these agreements are recorded as deferred revenue and included in “Deferred rent and other long term liabilities” in our consolidated balance sheets. Territory fees are recognized as income on a pro-rata basis at the same time the individual franchise fees for each location are considered earned, typically when the individual franchise unit is opened. We have

not

recognized any franchise related income for the year ended

December

31,

2016.

Sales Tax Policy [Policy Text Block]

Sales Taxes

Revenues are presented net of sales taxes. The sales tax obligation is included in accrued expenses until the taxes are remitted to the appropriate taxing authorities.

Advertising Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Advertising and Marketing Costs

Advertising and marketing costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising and marketing expense for

2016,

2015

and

2014

was

$935,000,

$744,000

and

$461,000,

respectively, and is included in restaurant operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss). We maintain a customer loyalty club (the Konavore™ program), an email-based marketing program designed to communicate new menu offerings, restaurant specific events, and other marketing messages to keep Kona Grill top of mind for consumers. The Konavore™ loyalty program offers members a discount coupon upon enrolling in the program and a discount coupon for a member’s birthday. These coupons are recognized upon redemption and recorded in the financial statements as a sales discount. Costs associated with the redemption of a promotion in the form of a coupon for discounted product are recorded in cost of sales as these coupons are typically redeemed with the purchase of additional food and beverage items. Costs associated with promotional giveaways of food and beverages to local businesses and sponsorship of events are viewed as advertising in nature and recorded in restaurant operating expenses.

Preopening Expense Policy [Policy Text Block]

Preopening Expense

Costs directly related to the opening of new restaurants, including employee relocation, travel, employee payroll and related training costs, and rent expense subsequent to the date we take possession of the property through the restaurant opening are expensed as incurred.

Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block]

Stock-Based Compensation

We maintain stock award plans under which we

may

issue incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, and other types of awards to employees, directors, and consultants. Stock options issued under these plans are granted with an exercise price at or above the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and expire

five

years from the date of grant. Employee stock options generally vest

25%

each year over a

four

-year period, while annual recurring awards for non-employee director options vest

25%

each quarter over a

one

-year period. Certain stock option awards for executive officers

may

vest earlier in the event of a change of control or termination, as defined in the executive officer’s employment agreement. We apply the Black-Scholes valuation model in determining the fair value of stock option grants. We recognize compensation cost for our stock awards using a graded vesting schedule on a straight line basis over the requisite service period.

Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Income Taxes

We utilize the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed at each balance sheet date for temporary differences between the consolidated financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on tax rates in effect in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts that will more likely than not be realized.

We recognize the impact of a tax position in our financial statements if that position more likely than not will be sustained upon examination by a tax authority. We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense.

Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Net Income

(Loss)

Per Share

Basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss) per share is computed similarly except that weighted average common shares is increased to reflect all dilutive instruments, including stock options. The dilutive effects of the dilutive securities are calculated using the treasury stock method and only those instruments that result in a reduction in income per share are included in the calculation. For

2016,

2015

and

2014,

there were

790,000,

608,000

and

197,000

stock options outstanding, respectively, that were not included in the dilutive earnings per share calculation because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:

	Year Ended December 31,
	201 6			201 5			201 4
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	(21,629	)	$	(4,496	)	$	703
Denominator:
Weighted average shares — basic		10,791			11,264			9,870
Effect of dilutive stock options		—			—			393
Weighted average shares — diluted		10,791			11,264			10,263
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(2.00	)	$	(0.40	)	$	0.07
Diluted	$	(2.00	)	$	(0.40	)	$	0.07

New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In

May

2014,

the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)

2014

-

09,

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic

606)

. The pronouncement was issued to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and is effective for reporting periods beginning after

December

15,

2017.

We are currently performing an assessment of the revised standard and impacts on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures. To date, we have reviewed a sample of contracts that are representative of the current types of revenue generating streams. We are still in the process of completing our assessment of the impacts, including the potential impacts on variable consideration on royalty income received from franchise sales; however, based on the initial assessment we do not expect it to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements, and based on preliminary findings, we do not expect these areas to have an impact on revenue recognition. We expect to have an update to the impacts of the standard in the

second

quarter of

2017.

We anticipate adopting the new standard effective

January

1,

2018.

The guidance

may

be applied retrospectively for all periods presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application. We currently anticipate adopting the standard retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the amended guidance recognized at

January

1,

2018.

In

April

2015,

the FASB issued ASU

2015

-

03,

Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic

835

-

30):

Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs

. This guidance requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of that debt liability. However, the guidance in ASU

2015

-

15,

issued in

August

2015,

Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements

, prescribes that deferred initial up-front commitment fees paid by a borrower to a lender represent the benefit of being able to access capital over the contractual term, and therefore, meet the definition of an asset, while debt issuance costs in the scope of ASU

2015

-

03

do not. As such, the Company will continue to present the costs associated with its asset-based revolving credit facility as an asset. Debt issuance costs associated with our asset-based revolving credit facility of

$539,000

as of

December

31,

2016

are included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other assets in the consolidated balance sheet, while debt issuance costs of

$180,000

associated with our term loan are netted against the outstanding debt.

In

April

2015,

the FASB issued ASU No.

2015

-

05,

Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic

350

-

40)

. The pronouncement was issued to provide guidance concerning accounting for fees in a cloud computing arrangement. We have elected to adopt the guidance prospectively. The adoption of ASU

2015

-

05

did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In

February

2016,

ASC Topic

842,

Leases

, was issued to increase the transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. In order to meet that objective, the new standard requires recognition of the assets and liabilities that arise from leases. Accordingly, a lessee will recognize a right-of-use (ROU) asset for its right to use the underlying asset and a lease liability for the corresponding lease obligation. Both the ROU asset and lease liability will initially be measured at the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term. Subsequent measurement, including the presentation of expenses and cash flows, will depend on the classification of the lease as either finance or an operating lease. Initial costs directly attributable to negotiating and arranging the lease will be included in the ROU asset. Lessees can make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize a ROU asset and corresponding lease liability for leases with a term of

12

months or less. Accounting by lessors will remain largely unchanged from current U.S. GAAP. In transition, lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients that companies

may

elect to apply. These practical expedients relate to the identification and classification of leases that commenced before the effective date, initial direct costs for leases that commenced before the effective date, and the ability to use hindsight in evaluating lessee options to extend or terminate a lease or to purchase the underlying asset. The transition guidance also provides specific guidance for sale and leaseback transactions, build-to-suit leases, leveraged leases, and amounts previously recognized in accordance with the business combinations guidance for leases. The new standard is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after

December

15,

2018,

and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The expected adoption method is being evaluated by us. We expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In

March

2016,

the FASB issued ASU

2016

-

09,

Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic

718)

which simplifies the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after

December

15,

2016,

and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The company will adopt this standard effective

January

1,

2017.

We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In

August

2016,

the FASB issued ASU

2016

-

15,

Statement of Cash Flows – Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments

as stakeholders indicated that there is diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic

230,

Statement of Cash Flows, and other Topics. This ASU addressed

eight

specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after

December

15,

2017,

and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The amendments should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. We will adopt this standard effective

January

1,

2017

noting it will not have any impact on the way we report items within our statement of cash flows.

XML

Note 1 - The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes Tables

Property Plant and Equipment, Estimated Useful Lives [Table Text Block]

Furniture and fixtures (in years)	5	-	7
Equipment (in years)	2	-	7
Computer software and electronic equipment (in years)		3
Leasehold improvements	Shorter of the useful life or the lease term

Schedule of Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted [Table Text Block]

	Year Ended December 31,
	201 6			201 5			201 4
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	(21,629	)	$	(4,496	)	$	703
Denominator:
Weighted average shares — basic		10,791			11,264			9,870
Effect of dilutive stock options		—			—			393
Weighted average shares — diluted		10,791			11,264			10,263
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(2.00	)	$	(0.40	)	$	0.07
Diluted	$	(2.00	)	$	(0.40	)	$	0.07

XML

Note 2 - Property and Equipment (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes Tables

Property, Plant and Equipment [Table Text Block]

	December 31,
	201 6			201 5
Leasehold improvements	$	115,902		$	96,473
Equipment		29,900			25,825
Furniture and fixtures		12,196			11,126
		157,998			133,424
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(62,921	)		(54,027	)
		95,077			79,397
Construction in progress		3,191			7,855
Total property and equipment, net	$	98,268		$	87,252

XML

Note 3 - Accrued Expenses (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes Tables

Schedule of Accrued Liabilities [Table Text Block]

	December 31,
	201 6		201 5
Accrued payroll and benefits	$	4,549	$	3,786
Gift cards		4,311		2,309
Accrued construction and remodel (1)		2,005		5,017
Sales and use taxes		1,776		1,678
Business and income taxes		563		321
Accrued occupancy		240		296
Other		1,006		875
Total accrued expenses	$	14,450	$	14,282

XML

Note 4 - Debt and Credit Agreements (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes Tables

Schedule of Long-term Debt Instruments [Table Text Block]

		December 31, 2016							December 31, 2015
	Maturity Date	Unamortized Deferred Financing Costs (a)		Fair Value of Debt (b)		Carrying Value of Debt			Carrying Value of Debt
Revolver	Oct. 2021	$	539	$	12,000	$	12,000		$	-
Term Loan	Oct. 2021		180		14,813		14,813			-
Total debt		$	719	$	26,813		26,813			-
Debt issuance costs presented with debt (a)							(180	)		-
Total debt, net							26,633
Less: current portion							712
Long term debt						$	25,921		$	-

Schedule of Maturities of Long-term Debt [Table Text Block]

2017	$	750
2018		844
2019		1,125
2020		1,219
2021		22,875
Thereafter		—
Total	$	26,813

XML

Note 5 - Income Taxes (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes Tables

Schedule of Components of Income Tax Expense (Benefit) [Table Text Block]

	Year Ended December 31,
	201 6		201 5		201 4
Current:
Federal	$	—	$	—	$	—
State		66		43		—
		66		43		—
Deferred:
Federal		—		—		—
State		—		—		—
		—		—		—
Total	$	66	$	43	$	—

Schedule of Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation [Table Text Block]

	Year Ended December 31,
	201 6			201 5			201 4
Income tax expense (benefit) at federal statutory rate of 34%	$	(7,331	)	$	(1,514	)	$	239
State income taxes, net of federal benefit		(1,382	)		46			41
Nondeductible expenses		701			583			484
Business tax credit		(1,692	)		(1,503	)		(1,959	)
Other		108			(273	)		(32	)
Change in valuation allowance		9,662			2,704	)		1,227
Total	$	66		$	43		$	—

Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities [Table Text Block]

	December 31,
	2016			201 5
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Net operating loss carryforward	$	10,694		$	8,027
Deferred rent		11,570			7,585
Business tax credits		12,558			10,917
Organizational and preopening costs		558			238
Stock-based compensation		1,033			797
Accrued expenses		157			79
Property and equipment		(7,338	)		(7,699	)
Other		984			610
Net deferred tax assets		30,216			20,554
Valuation allowance		(30,216	)		(20,554	)
Total	$	—		$	—

XML

Note 7 - Stock-based Compensation (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes Tables

Schedule of Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Allocation of Recognized Period Costs [Table Text Block]

	Year Ended December 31,
	201 6		201 5		201 4
Stock-based compensation	$	1,262	$	1,363	$	856

Schedule of Share-based Payment Award, Stock Options, Valuation Assumptions [Table Text Block]

	201 6			201 5			201 4
Expected volatility		45.2	%		40.7	%		36.8	%
Risk-free interest rate		0.9	%		0.9	%		0.7	%
Dividend yield		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%
Expected life (in years)		3.2			3.0			2.9
Weighted average fair value per option granted	$	4.57		$	6.67		$	4.15

Schedule of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity [Table Text Block]

	Shares Under Option			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding options at December 31, 2013		783,297		$	6.94
Granted		309,900			16.24
Forfeited		(26,650	)		13.08
Exercised		(326,297	)		6.82
Outstanding options at December 31, 2014		740,250			10.66
Granted		380,268			23.28
Forfeited		(81,213	)		19.73
Exercised		(77,837	)		7.40
Outstanding options at December 31, 2015		961,468			15.15
Granted		251,532			14.26
Forfeited		(111,094	)		11.49
Exercised		(127,706	)		6.73
Outstanding options at December 31, 2016		974,200		$	16.44		2.7	$	841,000
Exercisable at December 31, 2016		475,742		$	15.46		2.2	$	690,000

Schedule of Share-based Compensation, Shares Authorized under Stock Option Plans, by Exercise Price Range [Table Text Block]

				Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
Range of  Exercise Prices				Shares		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
	$4.99	–	$8.71		180,900		0.9	$	7.94		142,400	$	7.71
	$11.82	–	$18.85		489,582		3.2	$	15.21		199,475	$	15.59
			$23.49		303,718		3.1	$	23.49		133,867	$	23.49
					974,200		2.7	$	16.44		475,742	$	15.46

XML

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes Tables

Schedule of Rent Expense [Table Text Block]

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016		201 5		201 4
Minimum base rent	$	12,203	$	9,618	$	7,391
Contingent rent		222		269		168
Total rent	$	12,425	$	9,887	$	7,559

Schedule of Future Minimum Rental Payments for Operating Leases [Table Text Block]

2017	$	16,110
2018		15,956
2019		15,894
2020		15,400
2021		15,063
Thereafter		55,771
Total minimum lease payments	$	134,194

XML

Note 10 - Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Notes Tables

Quarterly Financial Information [Table Text Block]

	201 6
	March 31			June 30			September 30			December 31
Restaurant sales	$	39,277		$	43,296		$	43,358		$	43,592
Income (loss) from operations (2 )		(1,578	)		(738	)		(2,411	)		(16,265	)
Net income (loss) (2 )		(1,656	)		(835	)		(2,555	)		(16,583	)
Diluted net income (loss) per share (1) (2 )	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.24	)	$	(1.58	)

	2015
	March 31			June 30			September 30			December 31
Restaurant sales	$	32,807		$	36,225		$	35,925		$	38,066
Income (loss) from operations		(892	)		(28	)		(1,401	)		(1,953	)
Net income (loss)		(925	)		(93	)		(1,468	)		(2,011	)
Diluted net income (loss) per share (1)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.18	)

XML

Note 1 - The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details Textual)	1 Months Ended		3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2016	Feb. 29, 2016	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)		Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($) shares		Dec. 31, 2015 USD ($) shares	Dec. 31, 2014 USD ($) shares
Number of Restaurants			45		45
Number of States in which Entity Operates			23		23
Number of Reportable Segments					1
Asset Impairment Charges			$ 12,500,000		$ 12,454,000
Marketing and Advertising Expense					$ 935,000		$ 744,000	$ 461,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Expiration Period					5 years
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share, Amount | shares					790,000		608,000	197,000
Debt Issuance Costs, Net			180,000	[1]	$ 180,000	[1]
Franchise Revenue					0
Long-term Debt, Current and Non-current [Member] | Term Loan [Member]
Debt Issuance Costs, Net			180,000		180,000
Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets and Other Assets [Member]
Debt Issuance Costs, Line of Credit Arrangements, Net			$ 539,000		$ 539,000
Employee Stock Option [Member] | Employee Member
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Award Vesting Rights, Percentage					25.00%
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Award Vesting Period					4 years
Employee Stock Option [Member] | Non Employee Director [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Award Vesting Rights, Percentage					25.00%
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Award Vesting Period					1 year
MEXICO
Significant Changes, Franchises Sold		6
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
Significant Changes, Franchises Sold	6
Restaurant Location [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Operating Lease Original Term					10 years
Restaurant Location [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Operating Lease Original Term					20 years
Reclassification from Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets to Inventory [Member] | December 31, 2015 [Member]
Prior Period Reclassification Adjustment					$ 1,865,000
Reclassification from Other Assets to Prepaid Expense and Other Current Assets [Member]
Current Period Reclassification Adjustment					113,000
Reclassification from Other Assets to Prepaid Expense and Other Current Assets [Member] | December 31, 2015 [Member]
Prior Period Reclassification Adjustment					$ 82,000

[1] We have presented the deferred financing costs associated with the Term Loan in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability as of December 31, 2016. The deferred financing costs related to the Revolver continue to be presented as an asset, and are included in both Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other assets on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

XML

Note 1 - The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Property and Equipment, Estimated Useful Lives (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016
Furniture and Fixtures [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Property and Equipment (Year)	5 years
Furniture and Fixtures [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Property and Equipment (Year)	7 years
Equipment [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Property and Equipment (Year)	2 years
Equipment [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Property and Equipment (Year)	7 years
Computer Software and Electronic Equipment [Member]
Property and Equipment (Year)	3 years

XML

Note 1 - The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended																12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	[1]	Sep. 30, 2016	[1]	Jun. 30, 2016	[1]	Mar. 31, 2016	[1]	Dec. 31, 2015		Sep. 30, 2015		Jun. 30, 2015		Mar. 31, 2015		Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$ (16,583)		$ (2,555)		$ (835)		$ (1,656)		$ (2,011)		$ (1,468)		$ (93)		$ (925)		$ (21,629)	$ (4,496)	$ 703
Denominator:
Weighted average shares — basic (in shares)																	10,791	11,264	9,870
Effect of dilutive stock options (in shares)																			393
Weighted average shares — diluted (in shares)																	10,791	11,264	10,263
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic (in dollars per share)																	$ (2)	$ (0.40)	$ 0.07
Diluted (in dollars per share)	$ (1.58)	[2]	$ (0.24)	[2]	$ (0.08)	[2]	$ (0.15)	[2]	$ (0.18)	[2]	$ (0.13)	[2]	$ (0.01)	[2]	$ (0.08)	[2]	$ (2)	$ (0.40)	$ 0.07

[1] During the quarter ended December 31, 2016 we recorded a long-lived asset impairment charge of $12.5 million.

[2] Net income (loss) per share calculations for each quarter are based on the weighted average diluted shares outstanding for that quarter and may not total to the full year amount.

XML

Note 2 - Property and Equipment (Details Textual)	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2014 USD ($)
Internal Payroll Travel Costs Capitalized		$ 1,318,000	$ 774,000
Asset Impairment Charges	$ 12,500,000	$ 12,454,000
Number of Underperforming Restaurants	5	5

XML

Note 2 - Property and Equipment - Summary of Property and Equipment (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Property, plant and equipment gross	$ 157,998	$ 133,424
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	(62,921)	(54,027)
Property and equipment, net	98,268	87,252
Leasehold Improvements [Member]
Property, plant and equipment gross	115,902	96,473
Equipment [Member]
Property, plant and equipment gross	29,900	25,825
Furniture and Fixtures [Member]
Property, plant and equipment gross	12,196	11,126
Excluding Construction In Progress [Member]
Property and equipment, net	95,077	79,397
Construction in Progress [Member]
Property, plant and equipment gross	$ 3,191	$ 7,855

XML

Note 3 - Accrued Expenses - Accrued Expenses (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Accrued payroll and benefits		$ 4,549	$ 3,786
Gift cards		4,311	2,309
Accrued construction and remodel	[1]	2,005	5,017
Sales and use taxes		1,776	1,678
Business and income taxes		563	321
Accrued occupancy		240	296
Other		1,006	875
Total accrued expenses		$ 14,450	$ 14,282

[1] Balance is attributable to property additions for our new restaurants and remodels.

XML

Note 4 - Debt and Credit Agreements (Details Textual)					12 Months Ended
	Mar. 06, 2017 USD ($)	Oct. 12, 2016 USD ($)	Nov. 07, 2014 USD ($)	Apr. 19, 2013 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2014 USD ($)
Long-term Debt					$ 26,633,000
Long-term Debt, Gross					26,813,000
Interest Expense, Debt					572,000	184,000	$ 269,000
Interest Costs Capitalized					$ 178,000	$ 0	$ 0
KeyBank National Association and Stearns Bank National Association [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | Original Credit Agreement [Member]
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity				$ 20,000,000
Line of Credit Facility, Expiration Date				Apr. 19, 2017
KeyBank [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | First Amended Credit Agreement [Member]
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity			$ 35,000,000
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio Minimum					1.5
Line of Credit Facility, Expiration Date			Nov. 07, 2019
KeyBank [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | First Amended Credit Agreement [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility, Unused Capacity, Commitment Fee Percentage					0.175%
KeyBank [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | First Amended Credit Agreement [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Line of Credit Facility, Unused Capacity, Commitment Fee Percentage					0.35%
KeyBank [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | Amendment Number 1 of the First Amended Credit Agreement [Member]
Maximum Leverage Ratio					4.25
KeyBank and Zions First National Bank [Member] | Second Amended Credit Agreement [Member]
Debt Agreement, Maximum Borrowing Capacity		$ 60,000,000
Long-term Debt		$ 15,000,000
Long-term Debt, Gross					$ 26,800,000
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date		Oct. 12, 2021
KeyBank and Zions First National Bank [Member] | Second Amended Credit Agreement [Member] | London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate					1.75%
KeyBank and Zions First National Bank [Member] | Second Amended Credit Agreement [Member] | London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate					2.75%
KeyBank and Zions First National Bank [Member] | Second Amended Credit Agreement [Member] | Base Rate [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate					0.75%
KeyBank and Zions First National Bank [Member] | Second Amended Credit Agreement [Member] | Base Rate [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate					1.75%
KeyBank and Zions First National Bank [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member]
Line of Credit Facility, Expiration Date					Oct. 12, 2021
KeyBank and Zions First National Bank [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | Second Amended Credit Agreement [Member]
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity		$ 45,000,000
Line of Credit Facility, Remaining Borrowing Capacity					$ 33,200,000
Line of Credit Facility, Option to Increase Maximum Borrowing Capacity					$ 85,000,000
KeyBank and Zions First National Bank [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | Second Amended Credit Agreement [Member] | Subsequent Event [Member]
Proceeds from Lines of Credit	$ 8,000,000

XML

Note 4 - Debt and Credit Agreements - Schedule of Credit Facility and Debt Instruments (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		12 Months Ended
		Dec. 31, 2016		Dec. 31, 2015
Long Term Debt, Fair Value	[1]	$ 26,813
Long-term Debt, Gross		26,813
Debt Issuance Costs, Net		180	[2]
Unamortized Deferred Financing Costs		719
Debt issuance costs presented with debt		(180)	[2]
Total debt, net		26,633
Less: current portion		712
Long term debt		25,921
KeyBank and Zions First National Bank [Member] | Term Loan [Member]
Long Term Debt, Fair Value	[1]	14,813
Long-term Debt, Gross		$ 14,813
Debt Instrument, Maturity Date		Oct. 12, 2021
Debt Issuance Costs, Net		$ 180
Debt issuance costs presented with debt		$ (180)
Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | KeyBank and Zions First National Bank [Member]
Line of Credit Facility, Expiration Date		Oct. 12, 2021
Debt Issuance Costs, Line of Credit Arrangements, Net		$ 539
Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | KeyBank and Zions First National Bank [Member] | Line of Credit [Member]
Long Term Debt, Fair Value	[1]	12,000
Long-term Debt, Gross		$ 12,000

[1] Our Revolver and Term Loan bear interest at rates commensurate with market rates and therefore their respective carrying values approximate fair value.

[2] We have presented the deferred financing costs associated with the Term Loan in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability as of December 31, 2016. The deferred financing costs related to the Revolver continue to be presented as an asset, and are included in both Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other assets on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

XML

Note 4 - Debt and Credit Agreements -Schedule of Required Future Principal Payments (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
2017	$ 750
2018	844
2019	1,125
2020	1,219
2021	22,875
Thereafter
Total	$ 26,813

XML

Note 5 - Income Taxes (Details Textual) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Valuation Allowance, Deferred Tax Asset, Increase (Decrease), Amount	$ 9,700	$ 2,700
Unrecognized Tax Benefits	0	$ 1,700
Income Tax Examination, Penalties and Interest Accrued	$ 0
Earliest Tax Year [Member]
Open Tax Year	2012
Domestic Tax Authority [Member]
Operating Loss Carryforwards	$ 31,300
Tax Credit Carryforward, Amount	12,600
State and Local Jurisdiction [Member]
Operating Loss Carryforwards	$ 49,200

XML

Note 5 - Income Taxes - Income Tax Expense from Continuing Operations (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Current:
Federal
State	66	43
	66	43
Deferred:
Total	$ 66	$ 43

XML

Note 5 - Income Taxes - Income Tax Expense Reconciliation (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Income tax expense (benefit) at federal statutory rate of 34%	$ (7,331)	$ (1,514)	$ 239
State income taxes, net of federal benefit	(1,382)	46	41
Nondeductible expenses	701	583	484
Business tax credit	(1,692)	(1,503)	(1,959)
Other	108	(273)	(32)
Change in valuation allowance	9,662	2,704	1,227
Total	$ 66	$ 43

XML

Note 5 - Income Taxes - Income Tax Expense Reconciliation (Details) (Parentheticals)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Federal statutory rate	34.00%	34.00%	34.00%

XML

Note 5 - Income Taxes - Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Net operating loss carryforward	$ 10,694	$ 8,027
Deferred rent	11,570	7,585
Business tax credits	12,558	10,917
Organizational and preopening costs	558	238
Stock-based compensation	1,033	797
Accrued expenses	157	79
Property and equipment	(7,338)	(7,699)
Other	984	610
Net deferred tax assets	30,216	20,554
Valuation allowance	(30,216)	(20,554)
Total

XML

Note 6 - Stockholders' Equity (Details Textual)			1 Months Ended		3 Months Ended	7 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 06, 2016 $ / shares shares	Jun. 25, 2014 USD ($) $ / shares shares	Feb. 28, 2017 shares	Oct. 31, 2016 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($) $ / shares shares	Jun. 30, 2016 shares	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($) $ / shares shares	Dec. 31, 2015 USD ($) $ / shares shares	Dec. 31, 2014 USD ($) shares	Nov. 30, 2015 USD ($)	Apr. 30, 2015 shares	Apr. 29, 2015 shares
Preferred Stock, Shares Authorized					2,000,000		2,000,000	2,000,000
Preferred Stock, Par or Stated Value Per Share | $ / shares					$ 0.01		$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common Stock, Shares Authorized					30,000,000		30,000,000	30,000,000			30,000,000	15,000,000
Stock Repurchase Program, Authorized Amount | $										$ 10,000,000
Stock Repurchased and Retired During Period, Shares					136,790	832,937
Stock Repurchase Program, Additional Shares Authorized Amount | $				$ 5,000,000
Stock Repurchased and Retired During Period, Value | $					$ 1,427,000		$ (11,200,000)	$ 227,000
Common Stock, Par or Stated Value Per Share | $ / shares	$ 0.01				$ 0.01		$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock, Net | $		$ 40,900,000
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock | $		43,400,000							$ 40,879,000
Preferred Stock, Shares Outstanding					0		0	0
Preferred Stock, Shares Issued					0		0	0
Underwriting Expenses [Member]
Payments of Stock Issuance Costs | $		2,200,000
Other Offering Costs [Member]
Payments of Stock Issuance Costs | $		$ 300,000
Common Stock [Member]
Stock Repurchased and Retired During Period, Shares							952,000	18,000
Stock Repurchased and Retired During Period, Value | $							$ (9,000)
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, New Issues and Shares Sold by Stockholders		2,645,000
Sale of Stock, Price Per Share | $ / shares		$ 18.50
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, New Issues									2,345,000
Common Stock [Member] | Sold by the Company [Member]
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, New Issues		2,345,000
Common Stock [Member] | Sold by the Company [Member] | Option on Securities [Member]
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, New Issues		345,000
Common Stock [Member] | Sold by Selling Stockholders [Member]
Stock Issued During Period, Shares Sold by Stockholders		300,000
Preferred Stock Purchase Right [Member]
Class of Warrant or Right, Number of Warrants or Rights Issued Per Common Stock	1
Common Stock Ownership Percentage, Rights Exercisable, Minimum Threshold	9.90%
Preferred Stock Purchase Right [Member] | Preferred Stock [Member]
Class of Warrant or Right, Number of Securities Called by Each Warrant or Right	0.001
Class of Warrant or Right, Exercise Price of Warrants or Rights | $ / shares	$ 55.94
Subsequent Event [Member]
Stock Repurchased and Retired During Period, Shares			532,376

XML

Note 7 - Stock-based Compensation (Details Textual) - USD ($) shares in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014	Apr. 30, 2015
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Expiration Period	5 years
Common Stock, Capital Shares Reserved for Future Issuance	3.7			1.5
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Number of Shares Available for Grant	1.4
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Exercises in Period, Intrinsic Value	$ 800,000	$ 1,200,000	$ 5,000,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Vested in Period, Fair Value	1,100,000	$ 1,000,000	$ 700,000
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Nonvested Awards, Compensation Not yet Recognized, Stock Options	$ 1,800,000
Employee Service Share-based Compensation, Nonvested Awards, Compensation Cost Not yet Recognized, Period for Recognition	2 years 73 days
Employee Stock Option [Member] | Employee Member
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Award Vesting Rights, Percentage	25.00%
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Award Vesting Period	4 years
Employee Stock Option [Member] | Non Employee Director [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Award Vesting Rights, Percentage	25.00%
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Award Vesting Period	1 year

XML

Note 7 - Stock-based Compensation - Stock-based Compensation Expense (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Stock-based compensation	$ 1,262	$ 1,363	$ 856

XML

Note 7 - Stock-based Compensation - Stock Options Fair Value Assumptions (Details) - $ / shares	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Expected volatility (Rate)	45.20%	40.70%	36.80%
Risk-free interest rate (Rate)	0.90%	0.90%	0.70%
Dividend yield (Rate)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Expected life (in years) (Year)	3 years 73 days	3 years	2 years 328 days
Weighted average fair value per option granted (in dollars per share)	$ 4.57	$ 6.67	$ 4.15

XML

Note 7 - Stock-based Compensation - Stock Option Activity (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Outstanding, shares under option (in shares)	961,468	740,250	783,297
Outstanding, weighted average exercise price (in dollars per share)	$ 15.15	$ 10.66	$ 6.94
Granted, shares under option (in shares)	251,532	380,268	309,900
Granted, weighted average exercise price (in dollars per share)	$ 14.26	$ 23.28	$ 16.24
Forfeited, shares under option (in shares)	(111,094)	(81,213)	(26,650)
Forfeited, weighted average exercise price (in dollars per share)	$ 11.49	$ 19.73	$ 13.08
Exercised, shares under option (in shares)	(127,706)	(77,837)	(326,297)
Exercised, weighted average exercise price (in dollars per share)	$ 6.73	$ 7.40	$ 6.82
Outstanding, shares under option (in shares)	974,200	961,468	740,250
Outstanding, weighted average exercise price (in dollars per share)	$ 16.44	$ 15.15	$ 10.66
Outstanding, weighted average remaining contractual term (years) (Year)	2 years 255 days
Outstanding, aggregate intrinsic value	$ 841
Exercisable at December 31, 2016 (in shares)	475,742
Exercisable at December 31, 2016 (in dollars per share)	$ 15.46
Exercisable at December 31, 2016 (Year)	2 years 73 days
Exercisable at December 31, 2016	$ 690

XML

Note 7 - Stock-based Compensation - Options Outstanding and Exercisable (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 $ / shares shares
Options Outstanding Shares (in shares) | shares	974,200
Options Outstanding Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Year)	2 years 255 days
Options Outstanding Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 16.44
Options Exercisable Shares (in shares) | shares	475,742
Options Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 15.46
Range 1 [Member]
Range of Exercise Prices, Lower Limit (in dollars per share)	4.99
Range of Exercise Prices, Upper Limit (in dollars per share)	$ 8.71
Options Outstanding Shares (in shares) | shares	180,900
Options Outstanding Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Year)	328 days
Options Outstanding Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 7.94
Options Exercisable Shares (in shares) | shares	142,400
Options Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 7.71
Range 2 [Member]
Range of Exercise Prices, Lower Limit (in dollars per share)	11.82
Range of Exercise Prices, Upper Limit (in dollars per share)	$ 18.85
Options Outstanding Shares (in shares) | shares	489,582
Options Outstanding Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Year)	3 years 73 days
Options Outstanding Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 15.21
Options Exercisable Shares (in shares) | shares	199,475
Options Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 15.59
Range 3 [Member]
Options Outstanding Shares (in shares) | shares	303,718
Options Outstanding Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Year)	3 years 36 days
Options Outstanding Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 23.49
Options Exercisable Shares (in shares) | shares	133,867
Options Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share)	$ 23.49

XML

Note 8 - Employee Benefit Plans (Details Textual) - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014	Apr. 30, 2015
Defined Contribution Plan, Employer Discretionary Contribution Amount	$ 273,000	$ 263,000	$ 216,000
Common Stock, Capital Shares Reserved for Future Issuance	3,700,000			1,500,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Purchase Price of Common Stock, Percent	95.00%
Employee Stock Purchase Plan [Member]
Common Stock, Capital Shares Reserved for Future Issuance	425,000
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Maximum Employee Subscription Rate	15.00%
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Shares Purchased for Award	4,333	2,743	2,298

XML

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies (Details Textual) - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 18, 2013
Operating Lease Term	5 years
Default Judgement Set Aside Amount		$ 3.5

XML

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies - Rent Expense (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Minimum base rent	$ 12,203	$ 9,618	$ 7,391
Contingent rent	222	269	168
Total rent	$ 12,425	$ 9,887	$ 7,559

XML

Note 9 - Commitments and Contingencies - Future Minimum Lease Payments (Details) $ in Thousands	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
2017	$ 16,110
2018	15,956
2019	15,894
2020	15,400
2021	15,063
Thereafter	55,771
Total minimum lease payments	$ 134,194

XML

Note 10 - Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) (Details Textual) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Asset Impairment Charges	$ 12,500	$ 12,454

XML

Note 10 - Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) - Summarized Quarterly Unaudited Financial Data (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended																12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016		Sep. 30, 2016		Jun. 30, 2016		Mar. 31, 2016		Dec. 31, 2015		Sep. 30, 2015		Jun. 30, 2015		Mar. 31, 2015		Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Restaurant sales	$ 43,592		$ 43,358		$ 43,296		$ 39,277		$ 38,066		$ 35,925		$ 36,225		$ 32,807		$ 169,523	$ 143,023	$ 119,097
Income (loss) from operations	(16,265)	[1]	(2,411)	[1]	(738)	[1]	(1,578)	[1]	(1,953)		(1,401)		(28)		(892)		(20,992)	(4,273)	962
Net income (loss)	$ (16,583)	[1]	$ (2,555)	[1]	$ (835)	[1]	$ (1,656)	[1]	$ (2,011)		$ (1,468)		$ (93)		$ (925)		$ (21,629)	$ (4,496)	$ 703
Diluted net income (loss) per share (in dollars per share)	$ (1.58)	[1],[2]	$ (0.24)	[1],[2]	$ (0.08)	[1],[2]	$ (0.15)	[1],[2]	$ (0.18)	[2]	$ (0.13)	[2]	$ (0.01)	[2]	$ (0.08)	[2]	$ (2)	$ (0.40)	$ 0.07

[1] During the quarter ended December 31, 2016 we recorded a long-lived asset impairment charge of $12.5 million.

[2] Net income (loss) per share calculations for each quarter are based on the weighted average diluted shares outstanding for that quarter and may not total to the full year amount.