XML 93 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Property, Plant And Equipment
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Property, Plant And Equipment [Abstract]  
Property, Plant And Equipment

4. Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consist of the following at December 31:

 

     2011     2010  

Land

   $ 13,509      $ 12,897   

Building and improvements

     135,049        129,881   

Plant and equipment

     2,039,050        1,963,186   

Other

     147,342        133,241   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     2,334,950        2,239,205   

Less: Accumulated depreciation

     (1,196,845     (1,098,792
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     1,138,105        1,140,413   

Construction in progress

     93,961        29,921   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

   $ 1,232,066      $ 1,170,334   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Depreciation expense on property, plant and equipment of $110,268, $105,744 and $100,333 is included in cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The Company recorded asset impairment charges of $1,975 associated with the closure of its Springfield, Kentucky PVC pipe facility in June 2011. See Note 16 for more information.

The Company assessed certain of its Vinyls segment building products assets, with a carrying value of $100,049, for potential impairment in December 2011, and the Company's analysis concluded that these assets were not impaired. The future cash flows used to test the recoverability of these building products assets for the impairment analysis were calculated using an undiscounted cash flow methodology. The undiscounted cash flow projections were based on a 15-year forecast beginning in 2012, in order to reflect the estimated remaining useful lives of the assets. The forecast was based on sales volume trends and margins developed by management considering historical data. While the Company believes its estimates of undiscounted future cash flows used in performing the impairment test are appropriate, different assumptions regarding such cash flows could materially affect the evaluation. Under the undiscounted cash flow methodology, even if the future cash flows of the building products assets assessed for impairment decreased by 20%, they would not be impaired.