The information in this statement of additional information is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these
securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This statement of additional information is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
Subject To Completion
Preliminary Statement of Additional Information Dated March 13, 2023
NEUBERGER BERMAN REAL ESTATE SECURITIES INCOME FUND INC.
STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Securities Income Fund Inc. (the “Fund”) is a closed-end, diversified management investment
company.
This Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) relating to shares of common stock of the Fund (“Common Stock”) is not a prospectus and should
be read in conjunction with the Fund’s Prospectus relating to the Common Stock dated [●], 2023 (“Prospectus”). This SAI does not include all information that a prospective investor should
consider before purchasing Common Stock, and investors should obtain and read the Fund’s Prospectus prior to purchasing such shares. You can get a free copy of the Prospectus from Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC (“NBIA” or the
“Manager”), 1290 Avenue of the Americas, 22nd Floor, New York, NY 10104-0002 or by calling (877-461-1899. You may also obtain a copy of the Prospectus on the website (http://www.sec.gov) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
Capitalized terms used but not defined in this SAI have the meanings ascribed to them in the Prospectus.
No person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations not contained in the Prospectus or in this SAI in connection
with the offering made by the Prospectus, and, if given or made, such information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the Fund. The Prospectus and this SAI do not constitute an offering by the Fund in any
jurisdiction in which such offering may not lawfully be made.
The “Neuberger Berman” name and logo are registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC. “Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC” and the
Fund name in this SAI are either service marks or registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC.
This Statement of Additional Information is dated [●].
©2023 Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC. All rights reserved.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND LIMITATIONS
|
1
|
INVESTMENT STRATEGIES, TECHNIQUES AND RISKS
|
4
|
PORTFOLIO TRADING AND TURNOVER RATE
|
46
|
MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND
|
47
|
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES
|
68
|
PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
|
73
|
DISTRIBUTIONS
|
78
|
DESCRIPTION OF SHARES
|
79
|
CERTAIN PROVISIONS IN THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
|
81
|
REPURCHASE OF COMMON STOCK; TENDER OFFERS; CONVERSION TO OPEN-END FUND
|
82
|
TAX MATTERS
|
84
|
REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS
|
93
|
CUSTODIAN, TRANSFER AGENT AND DIVIDEND DISBURSEMENT AGENT
|
93
|
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
94
|
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES
|
94
|
COUNSEL
|
94
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
94
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
|
94
|
APPENDIX A RATINGS
|
A - 1
|
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES, POLICIES AND LIMITATIONS
The investment objectives and general investment policies of the Fund are described in the Fund’s Prospectus relating to the Common Stock.
Additional information concerning the characteristics of certain of the Fund’s investments is set forth below. NBIA is
responsible for the day-to-day management of the assets of the Fund.
Unless otherwise specified, the investment policies and limitations of the Fund are not fundamental. Any investment policy or limitation that is
not fundamental may be changed by the Board of Directors of the Fund (the “Board”) without stockholder approval. The investment objectives and fundamental investment policies and limitations of the Fund may not be changed without the approval
of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock and, if outstanding, preferred stock (“Preferred Stock”) voting as a single class, as well as by the vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Preferred Stock tabulated separately. A “majority of the outstanding” shares means (i) 67% or more of the shares present at a meeting, if the holders of more than 50% of the shares are present or represented by proxy, or (ii) more than 50% of
the shares, whichever of (i) or (ii) is less. These percentages are specified by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”).
Unless otherwise indicated, any investment policy or limitation that involves a maximum percentage of securities or assets will not be considered
exceeded unless the percentage limitation is exceeded immediately after, and because of, a transaction by the Fund. If, because of changes in the value of the Fund’s portfolio, the asset coverage for any notes (“Notes”) or other borrowings
(which, for the sake of clarity, do not include Preferred Stock) were to fall below 300%, this would limit the Fund’s ability to pay dividends and other distributions, and, therefore, the Fund intends to restore the 300% asset coverage as
soon as practical in light of the circumstances.
The Fund’s fundamental investment policies and limitations are as follows:
1. Borrowing. The Fund may not borrow money in excess of 33 1/3% of its total assets (including the amount of money borrowed) minus liabilities (other than the amount borrowed), except that the Fund may borrow up to
an additional 5% of its total assets for temporary purposes.
2. Commodities. The Fund may not purchase physical commodities or contracts thereon unless acquired as a result of the ownership of securities or instruments, but this restriction
shall not prohibit the Fund from purchasing futures contracts or options (including options on futures contracts, but excluding options or futures contracts on physical commodities) or from investing in securities of any kind.
For purposes of the limitation on commodities, the Fund does not consider foreign currencies or forward contracts to be
physical commodities.
3. Diversification. The Fund is non-diversified under the 1940 Act.1
________________________________________
1 Under the 1940 Act, the status of a fund that was registered as non-diversified may, under
certain circumstances, change to that of a diversified fund. The Fund is currently a diversified fund.
4. Industry Concentration. The Fund may not purchase any security if, as a result, 25% or more of its total assets (taken at current value) would be invested in the securities of
issuers having their principal business activities in the same industry, except that the Fund will invest greater than 25% of its total assets in the real estate industry. This limitation does not apply to purchases of securities issued or
guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities (“U.S. Government and Agency Securities”).
5. Lending. The Fund may not lend any security or make any other loan if, as a result, more than 33 1/3% of its total assets (taken at current value) would be lent to other parties,
except, in accordance with its investment objectives, policies, and limitations, (i) through the purchase of debt securities or (ii) by engaging in repurchase agreements.
6. Real Estate. The Fund may not purchase real estate unless acquired as a result of the ownership of securities or instruments, except that the Fund may (i) invest in securities of
issuers that mortgage, invest or deal in real estate or interests therein, (ii) invest in securities that are secured by real estate or interests therein, (iii) purchase and sell mortgage-related securities, (iv) hold and sell real estate
acquired by the Fund as a result of the ownership of securities, and (v) invest in REITs of any kind.
7. Senior Securities. The Fund may not issue senior securities, except as permitted under the 1940 Act.
8. Underwriting. The Fund may not underwrite securities of other issuers, except to the extent that the Fund, in
disposing of portfolio securities, may be deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“1933 Act”).
The Fund is also subject to the following non-fundamental restrictions and policies, which may be changed by the Board of Directors. The Fund must:
1. Lending. Except for the purchase of debt securities and engaging in repurchase agreements, the Fund may not make any loans other than
securities loans.
2. Margin Transactions. The Fund may not purchase securities on margin from brokers or other lenders, except that the Fund may obtain such
short-term credits as are necessary for the clearance of securities transactions. Margin payments in connection with transactions in futures contracts and options on futures contracts shall not constitute the purchase of securities on margin
and shall not be deemed to violate the foregoing limitation.
3. Foreign Securities. The Fund may not invest more than 10% of the value of its total assets in securities of non-U.S. issuers located in
countries considered by NBIA to be industrialized, which securities may be U.S. dollar-denominated or denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar. This policy does not limit investment in American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) and
similar instruments denominated in U.S. dollars, where the underlying security may be denominated in a foreign currency.
4. Investments In Any One Issuer. At the close of each quarter of the Fund’s taxable year, (i) no more than 25% of the value of its total
assets may be invested in the securities of a single issuer and (ii) with regard to 50% of the value of its total assets, no more than 5% of the value of its total
assets may be invested in the securities of a single issuer and the Fund may not hold more than 10% of an issuer’s outstanding voting securities. These limitations do
not apply to U.S. Government securities, as defined for tax purposes, or securities of another regulated investment company (“RIC”), as defined in Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”).
5. Securities Of Real Estate Companies. The Fund normally invests at least 80% of its Assets in securities of Real Estate Companies. If
because of market action, the Fund falls out of compliance with this policy, it will make future investments in such a manner as to bring the Fund back into compliance with the policy. Although this is a non-fundamental policy, the Board will
not change this policy without at least 60 days’ notice to the Fund’s stockholders. As used in this policy, Assets means net assets plus the amount of any borrowing for investment purposes.
Rule 18f-4, which became effective in August 2022, permits funds to engage in “derivatives transactions” as defined by that rule that would
otherwise be subject to the restrictions of Section 18 of the 1940 Act on their issuance of “senior securities.” For information on Rule 18f-4, see “Additional Investment Information -- Futures Contracts, Options on Futures Contracts, Options
on Securities and Indices, Forward Currency Contracts, Options on Foreign Currencies, and Swap Agreements” below.
Under the 1940 Act, a “senior security” does not include any promissory note or evidence of indebtedness regarding a loan for temporary purposes
only and in an amount not exceeding 5% of the value of the total assets of the issuer at the time the loan is made. A loan is presumed to be for temporary purposes if it is repaid within sixty days and is not extended or renewed. Any
Preferred Stock, if outstanding, would be considered senior securities under the 1940 Act. The Fund may only issue Preferred Stock if the asset coverage (as defined in the 1940 Act) with respect to Preferred Stock would be at least 200% after
such issuance.
The Fund interprets its policies with respect to borrowing and lending to permit such activities as may be lawful for the Fund, to the full extent
permitted by the 1940 Act or by exemption from the provisions therefrom pursuant to an exemptive order of the SEC.
If rating agencies assign different ratings to the same security, NBIA will determine which rating it believes best reflects the security’s quality
and risk at that time, which may be the highest of several assigned ratings.
With respect to these investment restrictions and other policies described in this SAI or the Prospectus (except the Fund’s policies on borrowings
and the issuance of senior securities set forth above), if a percentage restriction is adhered to at the time of an investment or transaction, a later change in percentage resulting from a change in the values of investments or the value of
the Fund’s assets, unless otherwise stated, will not constitute a violation of such restriction or policy.
Cash Management and Temporary Defensive Positions. In
anticipation of or in response to adverse market conditions, for cash management purposes, during a reasonable investment period following the completion of any offering, during any wind-down period, or for defensive purposes, the
Fund may invest up to 100% of its total assets in cash or cash equivalents, U.S. Government and Agency Securities, commercial paper, and certain other money market instruments, as well as repurchase agreements collateralized by the
foregoing. In such a case, the Fund may not be pursuing, and may not achieve, its investment objectives, and Common Stockholders may be adversely affected.
INVESTMENT STRATEGIES, TECHNIQUES AND RISKS
The following information supplements the discussion of the Fund’s investment objectives, policies and techniques in the Prospectus. The Fund may
make the following investments, among others, some of which are part of its principal investment strategies and some of which are not. The principal risks of the Fund’s principal strategies are discussed in the Prospectus. The Fund may not
buy all of the types of securities or use all of the investment techniques that are described.
Fixed Income Securities. Fixed
income securities are subject to the risk of an issuer’s inability to meet principal and interest payments on its obligations (“credit risk”) and are subject to price volatility due to such factors as interest rate sensitivity (“interest
rate risk”), market perception of the creditworthiness of the issuer, and market liquidity (“market risk”). The value of the Fund’s fixed income investments is likely to decline in times of rising market interest rates. Conversely, the
value of the Fund’s fixed income investments is likely to rise in times of declining market interest rates. Typically, the longer the time to maturity of a given security, the greater is the change in its value in response to a change in
interest rates. Foreign debt securities are subject to risks similar to those of other foreign securities.
Lower-rated securities are more likely to react to developments affecting market and credit risk than are more highly rated securities, which
react primarily to movements in the general level of interest rates. Debt securities in the lowest rating categories may involve a substantial risk of default or may be in default. Changes in economic conditions or developments regarding
the individual issuer are more likely to cause price volatility and weaken the capacity of the issuer of such securities to make principal and interest payments than is the case for higher-grade debt securities. An economic downturn
affecting the issuer may result in an increased incidence of default. The market for lower-rated securities may be thinner and less active than for higher-rated securities. Pricing of thinly traded securities requires greater judgment than
pricing of securities for which market transactions are regularly reported. Odd lots may trade at lower prices than institutional round lots.
Ratings of Fixed Income Securities. The Fund may purchase securities rated by S&P, Moody’s, Fitch, Inc. or any other nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”) (please see the Prospectuses for further information). The ratings of an NRSRO
represent its opinion as to the quality of securities it undertakes to rate. Ratings are not absolute standards of quality; consequently, securities with the same maturity, duration, coupon, and rating may have different yields. In
addition, NRSROs are subject to an inherent conflict of interest because they are often compensated by the same issuers whose securities they rate. Although the Fund may rely on the ratings of any NRSRO, the Fund refer primarily to
ratings assigned by S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch, Inc., which are described in Appendix A. The Fund may also invest in unrated securities that have been determined by the Manager to be comparable in quality to the rated securities in
which the Fund may permissibly invest.
High-Quality Debt Securities.
High-quality debt securities are securities that have received from at least one NRSRO, such as S&P, Moody’s or Fitch, Inc., a rating in one of the two highest rating categories (the highest category in the case of commercial paper)
or, if not rated by any NRSRO, such as U.S. Government and Agency Securities, have been determined by the Manager to be of comparable quality.
Investment Grade Debt Securities.
Investment grade debt securities are securities that have received, from at least one NRSRO that has rated it, a rating in one of the four highest rating categories or, if not rated by any NRSRO, have been determined by the Manager to be
of comparable quality. Moody’s deems securities rated in its fourth highest rating category (Baa) to have speculative characteristics; a change in economic factors could lead to a weakened capacity of the issuer to repay. If a security
receives one rating in one of the four highest rating categories and another rating below the fourth highest rating category, it will be considered investment grade.
Duration and Maturity. Duration
is a measure of the sensitivity of debt securities to changes in market interest rates, based on the entire cash flow associated with the securities, including payments occurring before the final repayment of principal.
The Manager may utilize duration as a tool in portfolio selection instead of the more traditional measure known as “term to maturity.” “Term to
maturity” measures only the time until a debt security provides its final payment, taking no account of the pattern of the security’s payments prior to maturity. Duration incorporates a bond’s yield, coupon interest payments, final maturity
and call features into one measure. Duration therefore provides a more accurate measurement of a bond’s likely price change in response to a given change in market interest rates. The longer the duration, the greater the bond’s price
movement will be as interest rates change. For any fixed income security with interest payments occurring prior to the payment of principal, duration is always less than maturity.
Futures, options and options on futures have durations which are generally related to the duration of the securities underlying them. Holding
long futures or call option positions will lengthen the Fund’s duration by approximately the same amount as would holding an equivalent amount of the underlying securities. Short futures or put options have durations roughly equal to the
negative of the duration of the securities that underlie these positions, and have the effect of reducing portfolio duration by approximately the same amount as would selling an equivalent amount of the underlying securities.
There are some situations where even the standard duration calculation does not properly reflect the interest rate exposure of a security. For
example, floating and variable rate securities often have final maturities of ten or more years; however, their interest rate exposure corresponds to the frequency of the coupon reset. Another example where the interest rate exposure is not
properly captured by duration is the case of mortgage-backed securities. The stated final maturity of such securities is generally 30 years, but current and expected prepayment rates are critical in determining the securities’ interest rate
exposure. In these and other similar situations, the Manager, where permitted, will use more sophisticated analytical techniques that incorporate the economic life of a security into the determination of its interest rate exposure.
Lower-Rated Debt Securities.
Lower-rated debt securities or “junk” or “junk bonds” are those rated below the fourth highest category (including those securities rated as low as D by S&P) or unrated securities of comparable quality. Securities rated below
investment grade are often considered to be speculative. These securities have poor protection with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Lower-rated debt securities generally offer a higher current yield
than that available for investment grade issues with similar maturities, but they may involve significant risk under adverse conditions. In particular, adverse changes in general economic conditions and in the industries in which the
issuers are engaged and changes in the financial condition of the issuers are more likely to cause price volatility and weaken the capacity of the issuer to make principal and interest payments than is
the case for higher-grade debt securities. These securities are susceptible to default or decline in market value
due to real or perceived adverse economic and business developments relating to the issuer, market interest rates and market liquidity. In addition, the Fund that invests in lower-quality securities may incur additional expenses to the
extent recovery is sought on defaulted securities. Because of the many risks involved in investing in lower-rated debt securities, the success of such investments is dependent on the credit analysis of the Manager.
During periods of economic downturn or rising interest rates, highly leveraged issuers may experience financial stress which could adversely
affect their ability to make payments of interest and principal and increase the possibility of default. In addition, such issuers may not have more traditional methods of financing available to them and may be unable to repay debt at
maturity by refinancing. The risk of loss due to default by such issuers is significantly greater because such securities frequently are unsecured and subordinated to the prior payment of senior indebtedness.
At certain times in the past, the market for lower-rated debt securities has expanded rapidly, and its growth generally paralleled a long
economic expansion. In the past, the prices of many lower-rated debt securities declined substantially, reflecting an expectation that many issuers of such securities might experience financial difficulties. As a result, the yields on
lower-rated debt securities rose dramatically. However, such higher yields did not reflect the value of the income stream that holders of such securities expected, but rather the risk that holders of such securities could lose a substantial
portion of their value as a result of the issuers’ financial restructuring or defaults. There can be no assurance that such declines will not recur.
The market for lower-rated debt issues generally is thinner or less active than that for higher quality securities, which may limit the Fund’s
ability to sell such securities at fair value in response to changes in the economy or financial markets. Judgment may play a greater role in pricing such securities than it does for more liquid securities. Adverse publicity and investor
perceptions, whether or not based on fundamental analysis, may also decrease the values and liquidity of lower rated debt securities, especially in a thinly traded market.
The Fund may invest in securities whose ratings imply an imminent risk of default with respect to such payments. Issuers of securities in
default may fail to resume principal or interest payments, in which case the Fund may lose its entire investment.
See Appendix A for further information about the ratings of debt securities assigned by S&P, Fitch, Inc., and Moody’s.
U.S. Government and Agency Securities. “U.S. Government Securities” are obligations of the Treasury Department backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. During times of market turbulence, investors may turn to the safety of securities issued or
guaranteed by the Treasury Department, causing the prices of these securities to rise and their yields to decline.
“U.S. Government Agency Securities” are issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies or by instrumentalities of the U.S. Government, such as
Ginnie Mae (also known as the Government National Mortgage Association), Fannie Mae (also known as the Federal National Mortgage Association), Freddie Mac (also known as the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation), SLM Corporation
(formerly, the Student Loan Marketing Association) (commonly known as “Sallie Mae”), Federal Home Loan Banks (“FHLB”), and the Tennessee Valley Authority. Some U.S. Government
Agency Securities are supported by the full faith and credit of the United States, while others may be supported by the issuer’s ability to borrow from the Treasury
Department, subject to the Treasury Department’s discretion in certain cases, or only by the credit of the issuer. Accordingly, there is at least a possibility of default. U.S. Government Agency Securities include U.S. Government agency
mortgage-backed securities. (See “Mortgage-Backed Securities” above.) The market prices of U.S. Government Agency Securities are not guaranteed by the U.S. Government and generally fluctuate inversely with changing interest rates.
U.S. Government Agency Securities are deemed to include (i) securities for which the payment of principal and interest is backed by an
irrevocable letter of credit issued by the U.S. Government, its agencies, authorities or instrumentalities and (ii) participations in loans made to foreign governments or their agencies that are so guaranteed. The secondary market for
certain of these participations is extremely limited. In the absence of a suitable secondary market, such participations may therefore be regarded as illiquid.
The Fund may invest in separately traded principal and interest components of securities issued or guaranteed by the Treasury Department. The
principal and interest components of selected securities are traded independently under the Separate Trading of Registered Interest and Principal of Securities (“STRIPS”) program. Under the STRIPS program, the principal and interest
components are individually numbered and separately issued by the Treasury Department at the request of depository financial institutions, which then trade the component parts independently. The market prices of STRIPS generally are more
volatile than that of Treasury Department bills with comparable maturities.
Policies and Limitations. The Fund has
no specific limits or requirements relating to the amount of assets invested in U.S. Government and Agency Securities; however, the Fund must invest according to its investment objectives and policies.
Real Estate-Related Instruments. The Fund will not invest directly in real estate, but the Fund may invest in securities issued by real estate companies.
Investments in the securities of companies in the real estate industry subject the Fund to the risks associated with the direct ownership of real estate. These risks include declines in the value of real estate, risks associated with
general and local economic conditions, possible lack of availability of mortgage funds, overbuilding, extended vacancies of properties, increased competition, increase in property taxes and operating expenses, changes in zoning laws, losses
due to costs resulting from the clean-up of environmental problems, liability to third parties for damages resulting from environmental problems, casualty or condemnation losses, limitation on rents, changes in neighborhood values and the
appeal of properties to tenants, and changes in interest rates. In addition, certain real estate valuations, including residential real estate values, are influenced by market sentiments, which can change rapidly and could result in a sharp
downward adjustment from current valuation levels.
Real estate-related instruments include securities of real estate investment trusts (also known as “REITs”), commercial and
residential mortgage-backed securities and real estate financings. Such instruments are sensitive to factors such as real estate values and property taxes, interest rates, cash flow of underlying real estate assets, overbuilding, and the
management skill and creditworthiness of the issuer. Real estate-related instruments may also be affected by tax and regulatory requirements, such as those relating to the environment.
REITs are sometimes informally characterized as equity REITs, mortgage REITs and hybrid REITs. An equity REIT invests
primarily in the fee ownership or leasehold ownership of land and buildings and derives its income primarily from rental income. An equity REIT may also realize capital gains (or losses) by selling real estate properties in its portfolio that
have appreciated (or depreciated) in value. A mortgage REIT invests primarily in mortgages on real estate, which may secure construction, development or long-term loans, and derives its income primarily from interest payments on the credit it
has extended. A hybrid REIT combines the characteristics of equity REITs and mortgage REITs, generally by holding both ownership interests and mortgage interests in real estate.
REITs (especially mortgage REITs) are subject to interest rate risk. Rising interest rates may cause REIT investors to demand
a higher annual yield, which may, in turn, cause a decline in the market price of the equity securities issued by a REIT. Rising interest rates also generally increase the costs of obtaining financing, which could cause the value of the
Fund’s REIT investments to decline. During periods when interest rates are declining, mortgages are often refinanced. Refinancing may reduce the yield on investments in mortgage REITs. In addition, because mortgage REITs depend on payment
under their mortgage loans and leases to generate cash to make distributions to their shareholders, investments in such REITs may be adversely affected by defaults on such mortgage loans or leases.
REITs are dependent upon management skill, are not diversified, and are subject to heavy cash flow dependency, defaults by
borrowers, and self-liquidation. Domestic REITs are also subject to the possibility of failing to qualify for tax-free “pass-through” of distributed net income and net realized gains under the Code and failing to maintain exemption from the
1940 Act.
REITs are subject to management fees and other expenses. Therefore, investments in REITs will cause the Fund to bear its
proportionate share of the costs of the REITs’ operations. At the same time, the Fund will continue to pay its own management fees and expenses with respect to all of its assets, including any portion invested in REITs.
Mortgage-Backed Securities. Mortgage-backed securities, including residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, represent direct or indirect participations in, or are
secured by and payable from, pools of mortgage loans. Those securities may be guaranteed by a U.S. Government agency or instrumentality (such as by Ginnie Mae); issued and guaranteed by a government-sponsored stockholder-owned corporation,
though not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States (such as by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (collectively, the “GSEs”), and described in greater detail below); or issued by fully private issuers. Private issuers are generally
originators of and investors in mortgage loans and include savings associations, mortgage bankers, commercial banks, investment bankers, and special purpose entities. Private mortgage-backed securities may be backed by U.S. Government
agency supported mortgage loans or some form of non-governmental credit enhancement.
Government-related guarantors (i.e., not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government)
include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Fannie Mae is a government-sponsored corporation owned by stockholders. It is subject to general regulation by the Federal Housing Finance Authority (“FHFA”). Fannie Mae purchases residential mortgages from
a list of approved seller/servicers that include state and federally chartered savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, commercial banks, credit unions and mortgage bankers. Fannie Mae guarantees the timely payment of principal
and interest on pass-through securities that it issues, but those securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.
Freddie Mac is a government-sponsored corporation formerly owned by the twelve Federal Home Loan Banks and now owned by stockholders. Freddie Mac
issues Participation Certificates (“PCs”), which represent interests in mortgages from Freddie Mac’s national portfolio. Freddie Mac guarantees the timely payment of interest and ultimate collection of principal on the PCs it issues, but
those PCs are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.
The Treasury Department has historically had the authority to purchase obligations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. However, in 2008, due to
capitalization concerns, Congress provided the Treasury Department with additional authority to lend the GSEs emergency funds and to purchase their stock. In September 2008, those capital concerns led the Treasury Department and the FHFA to
announce that the GSEs had been placed in conservatorship.
Since that time, the GSEs have received significant capital support through Treasury Department preferred stock purchases as well as Treasury
Department and Federal Reserve purchases of their mortgage backed securities (“MBS”). While the MBS purchase programs ended in 2010, the Treasury Department announced in December 2009 that it would continue its support for the entities’
capital as necessary to prevent a negative net worth. However, no assurance can be given that the Federal Reserve, Treasury Department, or FHFA initiatives will ensure that the GSEs will remain successful in meeting their obligations with
respect to the debt and MBS they issue into the future.
In 2012, the FHFA initiated a strategic plan to develop a program related to credit risk transfers intended to reduce Fannie Mae’s and Freddie
Mac’s overall risk through the creation of credit risk transfer assets (“CRTs”). CRTs come in two primary series: Structured Agency Credit Risk (“STACRs”) for Freddie Mac and Connecticut Avenue Securities (“CAS”) for Fannie Mae, although
other series may be developed in the future. CRTs are typically structured as unsecured general obligations of either entities guaranteed by a government-sponsored stockholder-owned corporation, though not backed by the full faith and credit
of the United States (such as by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (collectively, the “GSEs”) or special purpose entities), and their cash flows are based on the performance of a pool of reference loans. Unlike traditional residential MBS
securities, bond payments typically do not come directly from the underlying mortgages. Instead, the GSEs either make the payments to CRT investors, or the GSEs make certain payments to the special purpose entities and the special purpose
entities make payments to the investors. In certain structures, the special purpose entities make payments to the GSEs upon the occurrence of credit events with respect to the underlying mortgages, and the obligation of the special purpose
entity to make such payments to the GSE is senior to the obligation of the special purpose entity to make payments to the CRT investors. CRTs are typically floating rate securities and may have multiple tranches with losses first allocated
to the most junior or subordinate tranche. This structure results in increased sensitivity to dramatic housing downturns, especially for the subordinate tranches. Many CRTs also have collateral performance triggers (e.g., based on credit
enhancement, delinquencies or defaults, etc.) that could shut off principal payments to subordinate tranches. Generally, GSEs have the ability to call all of the CRT tranches at par in 10 years.
In addition, the future of the GSEs is in serious question as the U.S. Government is considering multiple options, ranging on a spectrum from
significant reform, nationalization, privatization, consolidation, or abolishment of the entities. Congress is considering several pieces of legislation that would reform the GSEs, proposing to address their structure, mission, portfolio
limits, and guarantee fees, among other issues.
The FHFA and the Treasury Department (through its agreement to purchase GSE preferred stock) have imposed strict limits on the size of GSEs’
mortgage portfolios. In August 2012, the Treasury Department amended its preferred stock purchase agreements to provide that the GSEs’ portfolios would be wound down at an annual rate of 15 percent (up from the previously agreed annual rate
of 10 percent), requiring the GSEs to reach the $250 billion target by December 31, 2018. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were below the $250 billion cap for year-end 2018. On December 21, 2017, a letter agreement between the Treasury and Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac changed the terms of the senior preferred stock certificates to permit the GSEs each to retain a $3 billion capital reserve, quarterly. Under the 2017 letter, each GSE paid a dividend to Treasury equal to the amount that
its net worth exceeded $3 billion at the end of each quarter. On September 30, 2019, the Treasury and the FHFA, acting as conservator to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, announced amendments to the respective senior preferred stock certificates
that will permit the GSEs to retain earnings beyond the $3 billion capital reserves previously allowed through the 2017 letter agreements. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are now permitted to maintain capital reserves of $25 billion and $20
billion, respectively.
Mortgage-backed securities may have either fixed or adjustable interest rates. Tax or regulatory changes may adversely affect the mortgage
securities market. In addition, changes in the market’s perception of the issuer may affect the value of mortgage-backed securities. The rate of return on mortgage-backed securities may be affected by prepayments of principal on the
underlying loans, which generally increase as market interest rates decline; as a result, when interest rates decline, holders of these securities normally do not benefit from appreciation in market value to the same extent as holders of
other non-callable debt securities.
Because many mortgages are repaid early, the actual maturity and duration of mortgage-backed securities are typically shorter than their stated
final maturity and their duration calculated solely on the basis of the stated life and payment schedule. In calculating its dollar-weighted average maturity and duration, the Fund may apply certain industry conventions regarding the maturity
and duration of mortgage-backed instruments. Different analysts use different models and assumptions in making these determinations. The Fund uses an approach that the Manager believes is reasonable in light of all relevant circumstances. If
this determination is not borne out in practice, it could positively or negatively affect the value of the Fund when market interest rates change. Increasing market interest rates generally extend the effective maturities of mortgage-backed
securities, increasing their sensitivity to interest rate changes.
Mortgage-backed securities may be issued in the form of collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) or collateralized mortgage-backed bonds
(“CBOs”). CMOs are obligations that are fully collateralized, directly or indirectly, by a pool of mortgages; payments of principal and interest on the mortgages are passed through to the holders of the CMOs, although not necessarily on a pro rata basis, on the same schedule as they are received. CBOs are general obligations of the issuer that are fully collateralized, directly or indirectly, by a pool of mortgages. The mortgages serve as
collateral for the issuer’s payment obligations on the bonds, but interest and principal payments on the mortgages are not passed through either directly (as with mortgage-backed “pass-through” securities issued or guaranteed by U.S.
Government agencies or instrumentalities) or on a modified basis (as with CMOs). Accordingly, a change in the rate of prepayments on the pool of mortgages could change the effective maturity or the duration of a CMO but not that of a CBO
(although, like many bonds, CBOs may be callable by the issuer prior to maturity). To the extent that rising interest rates cause prepayments to occur at a slower than expected rate, a CMO could be converted into a longer-term security that
is subject to greater risk of price volatility.
Governmental, government-related, and private entities (such as commercial banks, savings institutions, private mortgage
insurance companies, mortgage bankers, and other secondary market issuers, including securities broker-dealers and special purpose entities that generally are affiliates of the foregoing established to issue such securities) may create
mortgage loan pools to back CMOs and CBOs. Such issuers may be the originators and/or servicers of the underlying mortgage loans, as well as the guarantors of the mortgage-backed securities. Pools created by non-governmental issuers generally
offer a higher rate of interest than governmental and government-related pools because of the absence of direct or indirect government or agency guarantees. Various forms of insurance or guarantees, including individual loan, title, pool, and
hazard insurance and letters of credit, may support timely payment of interest and principal of non-governmental pools. Governmental entities, private insurers, and mortgage poolers issue these forms of insurance and guarantees. The Manager
considers such insurance and guarantees, as well as the creditworthiness of the issuers thereof, in determining whether a mortgage-backed security meets the Fund’s investment quality standards. There can be no assurance that private insurers
or guarantors can meet their obligations under insurance policies or guarantee arrangements. The Fund may buy mortgage-backed securities without insurance or guarantees, if the Manager determines that the securities meet the Fund’s quality
standards. The Manager will, consistent with the Fund’s investment objectives, policies and limitations and quality standards, consider making investments in new types of mortgage-backed securities as such securities are developed and offered
to investors.
Other Mortgage-Related Securities. Other
mortgage-related securities include securities other than those described above that directly or indirectly represent a participation in, or are secured by and payable from, mortgage loans on real property, including stripped
mortgage-backed securities. Other mortgage-related securities may be equity or debt securities issued by agencies or instrumentalities of the U.S. Government or by private originators of, or investors in, mortgage loans, including savings
and loan associations, homebuilders, mortgage banks, commercial banks, investment banks, partnerships, trusts and special purpose entities of the foregoing.
Variable or Floating Rate Securities; Demand and Put
Features. Variable rate and floating rate securities provide for automatic adjustment of the interest rate
at fixed intervals (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly, or semi-annually) or automatic adjustment of the interest rate whenever a specified interest rate or index changes. The interest rate on variable and floating rate securities (collectively,
“Adjustable Rate Securities”) ordinarily is determined by reference to a particular bank’s prime rate, the 90-day Treasury Department Bill rate, the rate of return on commercial paper or bank CDs, an index of short-term tax-exempt rates or
some other objective measure.
Adjustable Rate Securities frequently permit the holder to demand payment of the obligations’ principal and accrued interest
at any time or at specified intervals not exceeding one year. The demand feature usually is backed by a credit instrument (e.g., a bank letter of credit) from a creditworthy issuer and sometimes by insurance from a creditworthy insurer.
Without these credit enhancements, some Adjustable Rate Securities might not meet the Fund’s quality standards. Accordingly, in purchasing these securities, the Fund relies primarily on the creditworthiness of the credit instrument issuer or
the insurer. The Fund can also buy fixed rate securities accompanied by a demand feature or by a put option, which permits the Fund to sell the security to the issuer or third party at a specified price. The Fund may rely on the
creditworthiness of issuers of the credit enhancements in purchasing these securities.
Natural Disasters and Adverse Weather Conditions. Certain areas of the world historically have been prone to major natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, typhoons, flooding, tidal
waves, tsunamis, erupting volcanoes, wildfires or droughts, and have been economically sensitive
to environmental events. Such disasters, and the resulting damage, could have a severe and negative impact on the Fund’s investment portfolio and, in the longer term, could impair the ability of issuers in which the Fund invests to conduct
their businesses in the manner normally conducted. Adverse weather conditions may also have a particularly significant negative effect on issuers in the agricultural sector and on insurance companies that insure against the impact of
natural disasters.
Warrants and Rights. Warrants and rights may be acquired by the Fund in connection with other securities or separately. Warrants are securities permitting, but not obligating, their holder to
subscribe for other securities or commodities and provide the Fund with the right to purchase at a later date other securities of the issuer. Rights are similar to warrants but typically are issued by a company to existing holders of its
stock and provide those holders the right to purchase additional shares of stock at a later date. Rights also normally have a shorter duration than warrants. Warrants and rights do not carry with them the right to dividends or voting
rights with respect to the securities that they entitle their holder to purchase, and they do not represent any rights in the assets of the issuer. Warrants and rights may be more speculative than certain other types of investments and
entail risks that are not associated with a similar investment in a traditional equity instrument. While warrants and rights are generally considered equity securities, because the value of a warrant or right is derived, at least in part,
from the value of the underlying securities, they may be considered hybrid instruments that have features of both equity securities and derivative instruments. However, there are characteristics of warrants and rights that differ from
derivatives, including that the value of a warrant or right does not necessarily change with the value of the underlying securities. The purchase of warrants and rights involves the risk that the Fund could lose the purchase value of the
warrants or rights if the right to subscribe to additional shares is not exercised prior to the warrants’ or rights’ expiration date because warrants and rights cease to have value if they are not exercised prior to their expiration date.
Also, the purchase of warrants and rights involves the risk that the effective price paid for the warrants or rights added to the subscription price of the related security may exceed the value of the subscribed security’s market price such
as when there is no movement in the price of the underlying security. The market for warrants or rights may be very limited and it may be difficult to sell them promptly at an acceptable price.
Illiquid Securities. Generally, an illiquid security is any investment that may not reasonably be expected to be sold or disposed of in current market conditions in seven calendar
days or less without the sale or disposition significantly changing the market value of the investment. Illiquid securities may include unregistered or other restricted securities and repurchase agreements maturing in greater than seven
days. Illiquid securities may also include commercial paper under section 4(2) of the 1933 Act, and Rule 144A securities (restricted securities that may be traded freely among qualified institutional buyers pursuant to an exemption from the
registration requirements of the securities laws); these securities are considered illiquid unless the Manager determines they are liquid. Most such securities held by the Fund are deemed liquid. Generally, foreign securities freely
tradable in their principal market are not considered restricted or illiquid, even if they are not registered in the United States. Illiquid securities may be difficult for the Fund to value or dispose of due to the absence of an active
trading market. The sale of some illiquid securities by the Fund may be subject to legal restrictions, which could be costly to the Fund.
Repurchase Agreements. In a repurchase agreement, the Fund purchases securities from a bank that is a member of the Federal Reserve System, from a foreign bank or
from a U.S. branch or agency of a foreign bank, or from a securities dealer that agrees to repurchase the securities from the Fund at a higher price on a designated future date. Repurchase agreements generally are for a short
period of time, usually less than a week. Costs, delays, or losses could result if the selling
party to a repurchase agreement becomes bankrupt or otherwise defaults. The Manager monitors the creditworthiness of sellers. If the Fund enters into a repurchase agreement subject to foreign law and the counter-party defaults, the Fund
may not enjoy protections comparable to those provided to certain repurchase agreements under U.S. bankruptcy law and may suffer delays and losses in disposing of the collateral as a result.
Policies and Limitations. Repurchase agreements with a maturity of more than seven days are considered to be illiquid securities. The Fund may enter into a repurchase agreement only if (1) the underlying securities are of a type that the Fund’s investment
policies and limitations would allow it to purchase directly, (2) the market value of the underlying securities, including accrued interest, at all times equals or exceeds the repurchase price and (3) payment for the underlying securities
is made only upon satisfactory evidence that the securities are being held for the Fund’s account by its custodian or a bank acting as the Fund’s agent.
Securities Loans. The Fund may lend portfolio securities to banks, brokerage firms, and other institutional investors, provided that cash or equivalent collateral,
initially equal to at least 102% (105% in the case of foreign securities) of the market value of the loaned securities, is maintained by the borrower with the Fund or with the Fund’s lending agent, who holds the collateral on the Fund’s
behalf. Thereafter, cash or equivalent collateral, equal to at least 100% of the market value of the loaned securities, is to be continuously maintained by the borrower with the Fund. The Fund may invest the cash collateral and earn
income, or it may receive an agreed upon amount of interest income from a borrower that has delivered equivalent collateral. During the time securities are on loan, the borrower will pay the Fund an amount equivalent to any dividends or
interest paid on such securities. These loans are subject to termination at the option of the Fund or the borrower. The Fund may pay reasonable administrative and custodial fees in connection with a loan and may pay a negotiated portion of
the interest earned on the cash or equivalent collateral to the borrower. The Fund does not have the right to vote on securities while they are on loan. However, it is the Fund’s policy to attempt to terminate loans in time to vote those
proxies that the Fund has determined are material to the interests of the Fund. The Manager believes the risk of loss on these transactions is slight because if a borrower were to default for any reason, the collateral should satisfy the
obligation. However, as with other extensions of secured credit, loans of portfolio securities involve some risk of loss of rights in the collateral should the borrower fail financially.
The Fund may loan securities through third parties not affiliated with Neuberger Berman BD LLC that would act as agent to lend
securities to principal borrowers.
Policies and Limitations. The Fund may lend portfolio securities with a value not exceeding 33-1/3% of its total assets (taken at current value) to banks, brokerage firms, or other institutional investors. The Fund has authorized State Street Bank and
Trust Company (“State Street”) to effect loans of available securities of the Fund with entities on State Street’s approved list of borrowers, which includes State Street and its affiliates. The Fund may obtain a list of these approved
borrowers. Borrowers are required continuously to secure their obligations to return securities on loan from the Fund by depositing collateral in a form determined to be satisfactory by the Board. The collateral, which must be marked to
market daily, must be initially equal to at least 102% (105% in the case of foreign securities) of the market value of the loaned securities, which will also be marked to market daily. Thereafter, the collateral must be equal to at least
100% of the market value of the loaned securities. The Fund does not count uninvested collateral for purposes of any investment policy or limitation that requires the Fund to invest specific percentages of its assets in accordance with
its principal investment program.
Restricted Securities and Rule 144A Securities. The Fund may invest in “restricted securities,” which generally are securities that may be resold to the public only
pursuant to an effective registration statement under the 1933 Act or an exemption from registration. Regulation S under the 1933 Act is an exemption from registration that permits, under certain circumstances, the resale of restricted
securities in offshore transactions, subject to certain conditions, and Rule 144A under the 1933 Act is an exemption that permits the resale of certain restricted securities to qualified institutional buyers.
Since its adoption by the SEC in 1990, Rule 144A has facilitated trading of restricted securities among qualified
institutional investors. To the extent restricted securities held by the Fund qualify under Rule 144A and an institutional market develops for those securities, the Fund expects that it will be able to dispose of the securities without
registering the resale of such securities under the 1933 Act. However, to the extent that a robust market for such 144A securities does not develop, or a market develops but experiences periods of illiquidity, investments in Rule 144A
securities could increase the level of the Fund’s illiquidity.
Where an exemption from registration under the 1933 Act is unavailable, or where an institutional market is limited, the Fund
may, in certain circumstances, be permitted to require the issuer of restricted securities held by the Fund to file a registration statement to register the resale of such securities under the 1933 Act. In such case, the Fund will typically
be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expenses, and a considerable period may elapse between the decision to sell and the time the Fund may be permitted to resell a security under an effective registration statement. If, during
such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, or the value of the security were to decline, the Fund might obtain a less favorable price than prevailed when it decided to sell. Restricted securities for which no market exists are
priced by a method that the Fund Directors believe accurately reflects fair value.
Reverse Repurchase Agreements. In a reverse repurchase agreement, the Fund sells portfolio securities to another party and agrees to repurchase the securities at an agreed-upon price and date, which reflects an interest payment. Reverse
repurchase agreements involve the risk that the other party will fail to return the securities in a timely manner, or at all, which may result in losses to the Fund. The Fund could lose money if it is unable to recover the securities and
the value of the collateral held by the Fund is less than the value of the securities. These events could also trigger adverse tax consequences to the Fund. Reverse repurchase agreements also involve the risk that the market value of the
securities sold will decline below the price at which the Fund is obligated to repurchase them. Reverse repurchase agreements may be viewed as a form of borrowing by the Fund. When the Fund enters into a reverse repurchase agreement, any
fluctuations in the market value of either the securities transferred to another party or the securities in which the proceeds may be invested would affect the market value of the Fund’s assets. During the term of the agreement, the Fund
may also be obligated to pledge additional cash and/or securities in the event of a decline in the fair value of the transferred security. The Manager monitors the creditworthiness of counterparties to reverse repurchase agreements. For the
Fund’s policies and limitations on borrowing, see “Investment Objectives, Policies and Limitations -- Borrowing” above.
Policies and Limitations. Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act, among other things, permits a fund to treat reverse repurchase transactions (and other similar financing transactions) either as borrowings (subject to the asset coverage requirements under the 1940
Act) or as “derivatives transactions” subject to the requirements of Rule 18f-4. Accordingly, any reverse repurchase agreements treated as a borrowing will be considered borrowings for purposes of the Fund’s investment policies and
limitations
concerning borrowings. Any reverse repurchase agreement treated as a derivatives transaction as
defined in Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act will be subject to the requirements of that rule.
Foreign Securities. The Fund may invest in U.S. dollar-denominated securities of foreign issuers and foreign branches of U.S. banks, including negotiable CDs, bankers’
acceptances, and commercial paper. Foreign issuers are issuers organized and doing business principally outside the United States and include banks, non-U.S. governments, and quasi-governmental organizations. Investments in foreign
securities involve sovereign and other risks, in addition to the credit and market risks normally associated with domestic securities. These risks include the possibility of adverse political and economic developments (including political
or social instability, nationalization, expropriation, or confiscatory taxation); the potentially adverse effects of the unavailability of public information regarding issuers, less governmental supervision and regulation of financial
markets, reduced liquidity of certain financial markets, and the lack of uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting standards or the application of standards that are different or less stringent than those applied in the United
States; different laws and customs governing securities tracking; and possibly limited access to the courts to enforce the Fund’s rights as an investor. It may be difficult to invoke legal process or to enforce contractual obligations
abroad, and it may be especially difficult to sue a foreign government in the courts of that country.
The Fund also may invest in equity, debt, or other securities that are denominated in or indexed to foreign currencies,
including (1) common and preferred stocks, (2) CDs, commercial paper, fixed time deposits, and bankers’ acceptances issued by foreign banks, (3) obligations of other corporations, and (4) obligations of foreign governments and their
subdivisions, agencies, and instrumentalities, international agencies, and supranational entities. Investing in foreign currency denominated securities involves the special risks associated with investing in non-U.S. issuers, as described in
the preceding paragraph, and the additional risks of (a) adverse changes in foreign exchange rates, (b) nationalization, expropriation, or confiscatory taxation, and (c) adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations (which
could prevent cash from being brought back to the United States). Additionally, dividends and interest payable on foreign securities (and gains realized on disposition thereof) may be subject to foreign taxes, including taxes withheld from
those payments. Commissions on foreign securities exchanges are often at fixed rates and are generally higher than negotiated commissions on U.S. exchanges, although the Fund endeavors to achieve the most favorable net results on portfolio
transactions. Foreign securities often trade with less frequency and in less volume than domestic securities and therefore may exhibit greater price volatility. Additional costs associated with an investment in foreign securities may include
higher custodial fees than apply to domestic custody arrangements and transaction costs of foreign currency conversions.
Foreign markets also have different clearance and settlement procedures. In certain markets, there have been times when
settlements have been unable to keep pace with the volume of securities transactions, making it difficult to conduct such transactions. Delays in settlement could result in temporary periods when a portion of the assets of the Fund are
uninvested and no return is earned thereon. The inability of the Fund to make intended security purchases due to settlement problems could cause the Fund to miss attractive investment opportunities. Inability to dispose of portfolio
securities due to settlement problems could result in losses to the Fund due to subsequent declines in value of the securities or, if the Fund has entered into a contract to sell the securities, could result in possible liability to the
purchaser. The inability of the Fund to settle security purchases or sales due to settlement problems could cause the Fund to pay additional expenses, such as interest charges.
Securities of issuers traded on exchanges may be suspended, either by the issuers themselves, by an exchange or by government
authorities. The likelihood of such suspensions may be higher for securities of issuers in emerging or less-developed market countries than in countries with more developed markets. Trading suspensions may be applied from time to time to the
securities of individual issuers for reasons specific to that issuer, or may be applied broadly by exchanges or governmental authorities in response to market events. Suspensions may last for significant periods of time, during which trading
in the securities and instruments that reference the securities, such as participatory notes (or “P-notes”) or other derivative instruments, may be halted. In the event that the Fund holds material positions in such suspended securities or
instruments, the Fund’s ability to liquidate its positions or provide liquidity to investors may be compromised and the Fund could incur significant losses.
Interest rates prevailing in other countries may affect the prices of foreign securities and exchange rates for foreign
currencies. Local factors, including the strength of the local economy, the demand for borrowing, the government’s fiscal and monetary policies, and the international balance of payments, often affect interest rates in other countries.
Individual foreign economies may differ favorably or unfavorably from the U.S. economy in such respects as growth of gross national product, rate of inflation, capital reinvestment, resource self-sufficiency, and balance of payments position.
The Fund may invest in American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”), European Depositary Receipts (“EDRs”), Global Depositary
Receipts (“GDRs”) and International Depositary Receipts (“IDRs”). ADRs (sponsored or unsponsored) are receipts typically issued by a U.S. bank or trust company evidencing its ownership of the underlying foreign securities. Most ADRs are
denominated in U.S. dollars and are traded on a U.S. stock exchange. However, they are subject to the risk of fluctuation in the currency exchange rate if, as is often the case, the underlying securities are denominated in foreign currency.
EDRs are receipts issued by a European bank evidencing its ownership of the underlying foreign securities and are often denominated in a foreign currency. GDRs are receipts issued by either a U.S. or non-U.S. banking institution evidencing
its ownership of the underlying foreign securities and are often denominated in U.S. dollars. IDRs are receipts typically issued by a foreign bank or trust company evidencing its ownership of the underlying foreign securities. Depositary
receipts involve many of the same risks of investing directly in foreign securities, including currency risks and risks of foreign investing.
Issuers of the securities underlying sponsored depositary receipts, but not unsponsored depositary receipts, are contractually
obligated to disclose material information in the United States. Therefore, the market value of unsponsored depositary receipts is less likely to reflect the effect of such information.
Policies and Limitations. To limit the risks inherent in investing in foreign currency denominated securities of foreign issuers traded outside of the U.S., the Fund may not purchase such securities if, as a result, more than 10% of its total assets
(taken at market value) would be invested in such securities. Within those limitations, however, the Fund is not restricted in the amount it may invest in securities denominated in any one foreign currency.
Investments in securities of foreign issuers are subject to the Fund’s quality standards.
Commercial Paper. Commercial paper is a short-term debt security issued by a corporation, bank, municipality, or other issuer, usually for purposes such as financing
current operations. The Fund may invest in commercial paper that cannot be resold to the public without an effective registration
statement under the 1933 Act. While some restricted commercial paper normally is deemed illiquid,
the Manager may in certain cases determine that such paper is liquid.
Banking and Savings Institution Securities. These include CDs, time deposits, bankers’ acceptances, and other short-term and long-term debt obligations issued by
commercial banks and savings institutions. The CDs, time deposits, and bankers’ acceptances in which the Fund invest typically are not covered by deposit insurance.
A certificate of deposit is a short-term negotiable certificate issued by a commercial bank against funds deposited in the
bank and is either interest-bearing or purchased on a discount basis. A bankers’ acceptance is a short-term draft drawn on a commercial bank by a borrower, usually in connection with an international commercial transaction. The borrower is
liable for payment as is the bank, which unconditionally guarantees to pay the draft at its face amount on the maturity date. Fixed time deposits are obligations of branches of U.S. banks or foreign banks that are payable at a stated maturity
date and bear a fixed rate of interest. Although fixed time deposits do not have a market, there are no contractual restrictions on the right to transfer a beneficial interest in the deposit to a third party. Deposit notes are notes issued by
commercial banks that generally bear fixed rates of interest and typically have original maturities ranging from eighteen months to five years.
Banks are subject to extensive governmental regulations that may limit both the amounts and types of loans and other financial
commitments that may be made and the interest rates and fees that may be charged. The profitability of this industry is largely dependent upon the availability and cost of capital, which can fluctuate significantly when interest rates change.
Also, general economic conditions, consolidation and competition among banking and savings institutions play an important part in the operations of this industry and exposure to credit losses arising from possible financial difficulties of
borrowers might affect a bank’s ability to meet its obligations. Bank obligations may be general obligations of the parent bank or may be limited to the issuing branch by the terms of the specific obligations or by government regulation.
In response to the 2008 financial turmoil, the U.S. Government is taking a variety of measures to increase the regulation of depository
institutions and their holding companies. On July 21, 2010, the President signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which significantly impacts the financial services industry,
including more stringent regulation of depository institutions and their holding companies. Federal regulatory agencies are in the process of developing regulations to implement many of the Dodd-Frank Act’s provisions, so the full impact and
compliance burden on the operations and profitability of depository institutions and their holding companies is not yet clear and will not likely be clear for years to come. Based on the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and anticipated
implementing regulations, depository institutions and their holding companies are likely to be subject to significantly increased regulatory and compliance obligations. Accordingly, investments in bank paper may not yield expected returns
because the increased regulation may significantly curtail the operations and profitability of depository institutions and their holding companies.
Zero Coupon Securities, Step Coupon Securities,
Pay-in-Kind Securities and Discount Obligations. The Fund may invest in zero coupon securities, step coupon
securities and pay-in-kind securities. Zero coupon securities and step coupon securities are debt obligations that are issued and traded at a discount from their face amount or par value (known as “original issue discount” or “OID”) and do
not entitle the holder to any periodic payment of interest prior to maturity or that specify a future date when the securities begin to pay current interest. The Fund may also acquire certain debt securities
at a discount. These discount obligations involve special risk considerations. OID varies
depending on prevailing interest rates, the time remaining until cash payments begin, the liquidity of the security, and the perceived credit quality of the issuer.
Zero coupon securities and step coupon securities are redeemed at face value when they mature. Accrued OID must be included in
the Fund’s gross income for federal tax purposes ratably each taxable year prior to the receipt of any actual payments. Pay-in-kind securities pay “interest” through the issuance of additional securities.
Because the Fund must distribute substantially all of its net investment income (including non-cash income attributable to OID
and “interest” on pay-in-kind securities) and net realized gains to its stockholders each taxable year to continue to qualify for treatment as a RIC and to minimize or avoid payment of federal income and excise taxes, the Fund may have to
dispose of portfolio securities under disadvantageous circumstances to generate cash, or may be required to borrow, to satisfy the distribution requirements. See “Tax Matters – Taxation of the Fund.”
The market prices of zero coupon securities, step coupon securities, pay-in-kind securities and discount obligations generally
are more volatile than the prices of securities that pay cash interest periodically. Those securities and obligations are likely to respond to changes in interest rates to a greater degree than other types of debt securities having a similar
maturity and credit quality.
Convertible Securities. A convertible security is a bond, debenture, note, preferred stock, or other security or debt obligation that may be converted into or exchanged for a prescribed amount of common stock of the same or a different
issuer within a particular period of time at a specified price or formula. Convertible securities generally have features of, and risks associated with, both equity and fixed income instruments. As such, the value of most convertible
securities will vary with changes in the price of, and will be subject to the risks associated with, the underlying common stock. Additionally, convertible securities are also subject to the risk that the issuer may not be able to pay
principal or interest when due and the value of the convertible security may change based on the issuer’s credit rating.
A convertible security entitles the holder to receive the interest paid or accrued on debt or the dividend paid on preferred
stock until the convertible security matures or is redeemed, converted or exchanged. Before conversion, such securities ordinarily provide a stream of income with generally higher yields than common stocks of the same or similar issuers, but
lower than the yield on non-convertible debt. Convertible securities are usually subordinated to comparable-tier non-convertible securities and other senior debt obligations of the issuer, but rank senior to common stock in a company’s
capital structure. The value of a convertible security is a function of (1) its yield in comparison to the yields of other securities of comparable maturity and quality that do not have a conversion privilege and (2) its worth if converted
into the underlying common stock.
The price of a convertible security often reflects variations in the price of the underlying common stock in a way that
non-convertible debt may not. Convertible securities may be issued by smaller capitalization companies whose stock prices may be more volatile than larger capitalization companies. A convertible security may have a mandatory conversion
feature or a call feature that subjects it to redemption at the option of the issuer at a price established in the security’s governing instrument. If a convertible security held by the Fund is called for redemption, the Fund will be required
to convert it into the underlying common stock, sell it to a third party or permit the issuer to redeem the
security. Any of these actions could have an adverse effect on the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objectives.
Preferred Stock. Unlike interest payments on debt securities, dividends on preferred stock are generally payable at the discretion of the issuer’s board of directors. Preferred stockholders may have certain rights if dividends are not paid but
generally have no legal recourse against the issuer. Stockholders may suffer a loss of value if dividends are not paid. The market prices of preferred stocks are generally more sensitive to changes in the issuer’s creditworthiness than are
the prices of debt securities.
Indexed Securities. The
Fund may invest in indexed securities whose values are linked to currencies, interest rates, commodities, indices, or other financial indicators, domestic or foreign. Most indexed securities are short- to intermediate-term fixed income
securities whose values at maturity or interest rates rise or fall according to the change in one or more specified underlying instruments. The value of indexed securities may increase or decrease if the underlying instrument appreciates,
and they may have return characteristics similar to direct investment in the underlying instrument. An indexed security may be more volatile than the underlying instrument itself.
Inflation-Indexed Securities.
Inflation-indexed bonds are fixed income securities whose principal value or coupon (interest payment) is periodically adjusted according to the rate of inflation. The Fund may invest in inflation-indexed securities issued in any country.
Two structures are common. The Treasury Department and some other issuers use a structure that accrues inflation into the principal value of the bond. Other issuers pay out the index-based accruals as part of a semiannual coupon. The Fund
may invest in Treasury Department securities the principal value of which is adjusted daily in accordance with changes to the Consumer Price Index. Such securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Interest is
calculated on the basis of the current adjusted principal value. The principal value of inflation-indexed securities declines in periods of deflation, but holders at maturity receive no less than par. If inflation is lower than expected
during the period the Fund holds the security, the Fund may earn less on it than on a conventional bond.
The Fund may invest in Treasury Department inflation-indexed securities, formerly called “U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities” (“U.S.
TIPS”), which are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. The periodic adjustment of U.S. TIPS is currently tied to the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”), which is calculated by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS), which is part of the Labor Department. The CPI-U is a measurement of changes in the cost of living, made up of components such as housing, food, transportation and energy. Inflation-indexed bonds issued by a non-U.S.
government are generally adjusted to reflect a comparable inflation index, calculated by that government. There can be no assurance that the CPI-U or any non-U.S. inflation index will accurately measure the real rate of inflation in the
prices of goods and services. In addition, there can be no assurance that the rate of inflation in a non-U.S. country will be correlated to the rate of inflation in the United States. The three-month lag in calculating the CPI-U for purposes
of adjusting the principal value of U.S. TIPS may give rise to risks under certain circumstances.
Interest is calculated on the basis of the current adjusted principal value. The principal value of inflation-indexed securities declines in
periods of deflation, but holders at maturity receive no less than par. However, if the Fund purchases inflation-indexed securities in the secondary market whose principal values have been adjusted upward due to inflation since issuance, the
Fund may experience a loss if there is a subsequent period of deflation. If inflation is lower than expected during the period the Fund holds the security, the Fund may earn less on it than on a conventional bond. The Fund may
also invest in other inflation-related bonds which may or may not provide a guarantee of principal. If a guarantee of principal is not provided, the adjusted
principal value of the bond repaid at maturity may be less than the original principal amount.
Because the coupon rate on inflation-indexed securities is lower than fixed-rate Treasury Department securities, the CPI-U would have to rise at
least to the amount of the difference between the coupon rate of the fixed-rate Treasury Department issues and the coupon rate of the inflation-indexed securities, assuming all other factors are equal, in order for such securities to match
the performance of the fixed-rate Treasury Department securities. Inflation-indexed securities are expected to react primarily to changes in the “real” interest rate (i.e., the nominal (or stated) rate
less the rate of inflation), while a typical bond reacts to changes in the nominal interest rate. Accordingly, inflation-indexed securities have characteristics of fixed-rate Treasury Department securities having a shorter duration. Changes
in market interest rates from causes other than inflation will likely affect the market prices of inflation-indexed securities in the same manner as conventional bonds.
Any increase in the principal value of an inflation-indexed security is taxable in the year the increase occurs, even though its holders do not
receive cash representing the increase until the security matures. Because the Fund must distribute substantially all of its net investment income (including non-cash income attributable to those principal value increases) and net realized
gains to its stockholders each taxable year to continue to qualify for treatment as a RIC and to minimize or avoid payment of federal income and excise taxes, the Fund may have to dispose of other investments under disadvantageous
circumstances to generate cash, or may be required to borrow, to satisfy its distribution requirements.
The Treasury Department began issuing inflation-indexed bonds in 1997. Certain non-U.S. governments, such as the United Kingdom, Canada and
Australia, have a longer history of issuing inflation-indexed bonds, and there may be a more liquid market in certain of these countries for these securities.
Securities of Other Investment Companies. As indicated above, investments by the Fund in shares of other investment companies are subject to the limitations of the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. However, pursuant to Rule 12d1-4, the Fund is permitted to
invest in shares of certain investment companies beyond the limits contained in the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder if the Fund complies with the adopted framework for fund of funds arrangements under the rule. The Fund
may invest in the securities of other investment companies, including open-end management companies, closed-end management companies (including business development companies (“BDCs”)) and unit investment trusts, that are consistent with
its investment objectives and policies. Such an investment may be the most practical or only manner in which the Fund can invest in certain asset classes or participate in certain markets, such as foreign markets, because of the expenses
involved or because other vehicles for investing in those markets may not be available at the time the Fund is ready to make an investment. When investing in the securities of other investment companies, the Fund will be indirectly exposed
to all the risks of such investment companies’ portfolio securities. In addition, as a shareholder in an investment company, the Fund would indirectly bear its pro rata share of that investment company’s advisory fees and other operating
expenses. Fees and expenses incurred indirectly by the Fund as a result of its investment in shares of one or more other investment companies generally are referred to as “acquired fund fees and expenses” and may appear as a separate line
item in the Fund’s Prospectus fee table. For certain investment companies, such as BDCs, these expenses
may be significant. The 1940 Act imposes certain restraints upon the operations of a BDC. For example, BDCs are
required to invest at least 70% of their total assets primarily in securities of private companies or thinly traded U.S. public companies, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and high quality debt investments that mature in
one year or less. As a result, BDCs generally invest in less mature private companies, which involve greater risk than well-established, publicly-traded companies. In addition, the shares of closed-end management companies may involve the
payment of substantial premiums above, while the sale of such securities may be made at substantial discounts from, the value of such issuer’s portfolio securities. Historically, shares of closed-end funds, including BDCs, have frequently
traded at a discount to their NAV, which discounts have, on occasion, been substantial and lasted for sustained periods of time.
Certain money market funds that operate in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act float their NAV while others seek to
preserve the value of investments at a stable NAV (typically $1.00 per share). An investment in a money market fund, even an investment in the Fund seeking to maintain a stable NAV per share, is not guaranteed, and it is possible for the Fund
to lose money by investing in these and other types of money market funds. If the liquidity of a money market fund’s portfolio deteriorates below certain levels, the money market fund may suspend redemptions (i.e., impose a redemption gate)
and thereby prevent the Fund from selling its investment in the money market fund or impose a fee of up to 2% on amounts the Fund redeems from the money market fund (i.e., impose a liquidity fee).
Policies and Limitations. For cash management purposes, the Fund may invest an unlimited amount of its uninvested cash and cash collateral received in connection with securities lending in shares of money market funds and unregistered funds that operate
in compliance with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, whether or not advised by the Manager or an affiliate, under specified conditions. See “Cash Management and Temporary Defensive Positions.”
Otherwise, the Fund’s investment in securities of other investment companies is generally limited to (i) 3% of the total
voting stock of any one investment company, (ii) 5% of the Fund’s total assets with respect to any one investment company and (iii) 10% of the Fund’s total assets in all investment companies in the aggregate. However, the Fund may exceed
these limits when investing in shares of an ETF, subject to the requirements under Rule 12d1-4. In addition, the Fund may exceed these limits when investing in shares of certain other investment companies, subject to the requirements under
Rule 12d1-4.
Fund of fund arrangements must comply with the provisions of the 1940 Act, Rule 12d1-4, or another rule. Pursuant to Rule
12d1-4, the Fund is permitted to exceed the limits of Section 12 of the 1940 Act if the Fund complies with Rule 12d1-4’s conditions, including (i) limits on control and voting; (ii) required evaluations and findings; (iii) required fund of
funds investment agreements; and (iv) limits on complex structures.
Futures Contracts, Options on Futures Contracts, Options
on Securities and Indices, Forward Currency Contracts, Options on Foreign Currencies, and Swap Agreements (collectively, “Financial Instruments”). Financial Instruments are instruments whose
value is dependent upon the value of an underlying asset or assets, which may include stocks, bonds, commodities, interest rates, currency exchange rates, or related indices. As described below, Financial Instruments may be used for
“hedging” purposes, meaning that they may be used in an effort to offset a decline in value in the Fund’s other investments, which could result from changes in interest rates,
market prices, currency fluctuations, or other market factors. Financial Instruments may also be
used for non-hedging purposes in an effort to implement a cash management strategy, to enhance income or gain, to manage or adjust the risk profile of the Fund or the risk of individual positions, to gain exposure more efficiently than
through a direct purchase of the underlying security, or to gain exposure to securities, markets, sectors or geographical areas.
The Dodd-Frank Act requires the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) to establish new regulations with
respect to derivatives defined as security-based swaps (e.g., derivatives based on an equity or a narrowly based equity index) and swaps (e.g., derivatives
based on a broad-based index or commodity), respectively, and the markets in which these instruments trade. In addition, it subjected all security-based swaps and swaps to SEC and CFTC jurisdiction, respectively.
Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act regulates the use of derivatives transactions as defined by that rule for certain funds
registered under the 1940 Act (“Rule 18f-4”). Due to the way derivatives transactions are defined by Rule 18f-4, it includes transactions traditionally characterized as derivatives as well as certain transactions that have not been
traditionally characterized as derivatives. Unless the Fund qualifies as a “limited derivatives user” as defined in Rule 18f-4, the rule, among other things, requires the Fund to establish a derivatives risk management program, comply with
certain value-at-risk (“VAR”) based leverage limits, appoint a derivatives risk manager and provide additional disclosure both publicly and to the SEC regarding its derivatives positions. Rule 18f-4 provides an exception for limited
derivatives users, which Rule 18f-4 defines as any fund that limits its derivatives exposure to 10% of its net assets, excluding certain currency and interest rate hedging transactions. Limited derivatives users are exempt from Rule 18f-4’s
requirements to comply with VaR-based limits, appoint a derivatives risk manager, and adopt a derivatives risk management program. A limited derivatives user must still adopt and implement policies and procedures reasonably designed to manage
its derivatives risk.
Futures Contracts and Options on Futures Contracts. The Fund may purchase and sell futures contracts (sometimes referred to as “futures”) and options thereon for hedging purposes (i.e.,
to attempt to offset against changes in the prices of securities or, in the case of foreign currency futures and options thereon, to attempt to offset against changes in prevailing currency exchange rates) or non-hedging purposes.
A “purchase” of a futures contract (or entering into a “long” futures position) entails the buyer’s assumption of a contractual
obligation to take delivery of the instrument underlying the contract at a specified price at a specified future time. A “sale” of a futures contract (or entering into a “short” futures position) entails the seller’s assumption of a
contractual obligation to make delivery of the instrument underlying the contract at a specified price at a specified future time.
The value of a futures contract tends to increase or decrease in tandem with the value of its underlying instrument. Therefore, purchasing futures
contracts will tend to increase the Fund’s exposure to positive and negative price fluctuations in the underlying instrument, much as if the Fund had purchased the underlying instrument directly. The Fund may purchase futures contracts to fix
what the Manager believes to be a favorable price for securities the Fund intends to purchase. When the Fund sells a futures contract, by contrast, the value of its futures position will tend to move in a direction contrary to the market for
the underlying instrument. Selling futures contracts, therefore, will tend to offset both positive and negative market price changes, much as if the Fund had sold the underlying instrument. The Fund may sell futures contracts to offset a
possible decline in the value of its portfolio securities. In addition, the Fund may purchase or sell futures contracts with a greater or lesser value
than the securities it wishes to hedge to attempt to compensate for anticipated differences in volatility between positions the Fund may wish to hedge and the
standardized futures contracts available to it, although this may not be successful in all cases. Further, a loss incurred on a particular transaction being used as a hedge does not mean that it failed to achieve its objective, if the goal
was to prevent a worse loss that may have resulted had a particular securities or cash market investment suffered a substantial loss and there were no offsetting hedge.
Certain futures, including index futures and futures not calling for the physical delivery or acquisition of the instrument underlying the
contract, are settled on a net cash payment basis rather than by the delivery of the underlying instrument. In addition, although futures contracts by their terms may call for the physical delivery or acquisition of the instrument underlying
the contract, in most cases the contractual obligation is extinguished by being closed out before the expiration of the contract. A futures position is closed out by buying (to close out an earlier sale) or selling (to close out an earlier
purchase) an identical futures contract calling for delivery in the same month. This may result in a profit or loss. While futures contracts entered into by the Fund will usually be liquidated in this manner, the Fund may instead make or take
delivery of the underlying instrument or utilize the cash settlement process whenever it appears economically advantageous for it to do so.
Because the futures markets may be more liquid than the cash markets, the use of futures contracts permits the Fund to enhance portfolio liquidity
and maintain a defensive position without having to sell portfolio securities. For example, (i) futures contracts on single stocks, interest rates and indices (including on narrow-based indices) and options thereon may be used as a maturity
or duration management device and/or a device to reduce risk or preserve total return in an adverse environment for the hedged securities, and (ii) foreign currency futures and options thereon may be used as a means of establishing more
definitely the effective return on, or the purchase price of, securities denominated in foreign currencies that are held or intended to be acquired by the Fund.
For purposes of managing cash flow, the Fund may use futures and options thereon to increase its exposure to the performance of a recognized
securities index.
With respect to currency futures, the Fund may sell a currency futures contract or a call option thereon, or may purchase a put option on a
currency futures contract, if the Manager anticipates that exchange rates for a particular currency will fall. Such a transaction will be used as a hedge (or, in the case of a sale of a call option, a partial hedge) against a decrease in the
value of portfolio securities denominated in that currency. If the Manager anticipates that exchange rates for a particular currency will rise, the Fund may purchase a currency futures contract or a call option thereon to protect against an
increase in the price of securities that are denominated in that currency and that the Fund intends to purchase. The Fund also may purchase a currency futures contract or a call option thereon for non-hedging purposes when the Manager
anticipates that a particular currency will appreciate in value, but securities denominated in that currency do not present attractive investment opportunities and are not held in the Fund’s investment portfolio.
“Initial Margin” with respect to a futures contract is the amount of assets that must be deposited by the Fund with, or for the benefit of, a
futures commission merchant or broker in order to initiate the Fund’s futures positions. Initial margin is the margin deposit made by the Fund when it enters into a futures contract; it is intended to assure performance of the contract by
the Fund. If the value of the Fund’s futures account declines by a specified amount, the Fund will receive a margin call and be required to post assets sufficient to restore the equity in the account to the initial margin level. (This is
sometimes referred to as “variation margin;” technically, variation margin refers to daily payments that a clearing member firm is required to pay to the clearing
organization based upon marking to market of the firm’s portfolio.) However, if favorable price changes in the futures account cause the margin deposit to exceed the required initial margin level, the excess margin may be transferred to the
Fund. The futures commission merchant or clearing member firm through which the Fund enters into and clears futures contracts may require a margin deposit in excess of exchange minimum requirements based upon its assessment of the Fund’s
creditworthiness. In computing its NAV, the Fund will mark to market the value of its open futures positions. The Fund also must make margin deposits with respect to options on futures that it has written (but not with respect to options on
futures that it has purchased, if the Fund has paid the required premium in full at the outset). If the futures commission merchant or broker holding the margin deposit or premium goes bankrupt, the Fund could suffer a delay in recovering
excess margin or other funds and could ultimately suffer a loss.
Because of the low margin deposits required, futures trading involves an extremely high degree of leverage; as a result, a relatively small price
movement in a futures contract may result in immediate and substantial loss, or gain, to the investor. Losses that may arise from certain futures transactions are potentially unlimited, and may exceed initial margin deposits as well as
deposits made in response to subsequent margin calls.
The Fund may enter into futures contracts and options thereon that are traded on exchanges regulated by the CFTC or on non-U.S. exchanges. U.S.
futures contracts are traded on exchanges that have been designated as “contract markets” by the CFTC; futures transactions must be executed through a futures commission merchant that is a member of the relevant contract market. Futures
executed on regulated futures exchanges have minimal counterparty risk to the Fund because the exchange’s clearing organization assumes the position of the counterparty in each transaction. Thus, the Fund is exposed to risk only in
connection with the clearing organization and not in connection with the original counterparty to the transaction. However, if a futures customer defaults on a futures contract and the futures commission merchant carrying that customer’s
account cannot cover the defaulting customer’s obligations on its futures contracts, the clearing organization may use any or all of the collateral in the futures commission merchant’s customer omnibus account — including the assets of the
futures commission merchant’s other customers, such as the Fund — to meet the defaulting customer’s obligations. This is sometimes referred to as “fellow customer risk.” Trading on non-U.S. exchanges is subject to the legal requirements of
the jurisdiction in which the exchange is located and to the rules of such exchange, and may not involve a clearing mechanism and related guarantees. Funds deposited in connection with such trading may also be subject to the bankruptcy laws
of such other jurisdiction, which may result in a delay in recovering such funds in a bankruptcy and could ultimately result in a loss.
An option on a futures contract gives the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to assume a position in the contract (a long
position if the option is a call and a short position if the option is a put) at a specified exercise price at any time during the option exercise period. The writer of the option is required upon exercise to assume a short futures position
(if the option is a call) or a long futures position (if the option is a put). Upon exercise of the option, the accumulated cash balance in the writer’s futures margin account is delivered to the holder of the option. That balance represents
the amount by which the market price of the futures contract at exercise exceeds, in the case of a call, or is less than, in the case of a put, the exercise price of the option. Options on futures have characteristics and risks similar to
those of securities options, as discussed herein.
Although the Fund believes that the use of futures contracts and options may benefit it, if the Manager’s judgment about the general direction of
the markets or about interest rate or currency exchange rate trends is incorrect, the Fund’s overall return would be lower than if it had not entered into any such contracts. The prices of futures contracts and options are volatile and are
influenced by, among other things, actual and anticipated changes in interest or currency exchange rates, which in turn are affected by fiscal and monetary policies and by national and international political and economic events. At best, the
correlation between changes in prices of futures contracts or options and of securities being hedged can be only approximate due to differences between the futures and securities markets or differences between the securities or currencies
underlying the Fund’s futures or options position and the securities held by or to be purchased for the Fund. The currency futures or options market may be dominated by short-term traders seeking to profit from changes in exchange rates. This
would reduce the value of such contracts used for hedging purposes over a short-term period. Such distortions are generally minor and would diminish as the contract approaches maturity.
Under certain circumstances, futures exchanges may limit the amount of fluctuation in the price of a futures contract or option thereon during a
single trading day; once the daily limit has been reached, no trades may be made on that day at a price beyond that limit. Daily limits govern only price movements during a particular trading day, however; they do not limit potential
losses. In fact, a daily limit may increase the risk of loss, because prices can move to the daily limit for several consecutive trading days with little or no trading, thereby preventing liquidation of unfavorable futures and options
positions and subjecting traders to substantial losses. If this were to happen with respect to a position held by the Fund, it could (depending on the size of the position) have an adverse impact on the Fund’s NAV. In addition, the Fund
would continue to be subject to margin calls and might be required to maintain the position being hedged by the futures contract or option thereon or to maintain cash or securities in a collateral account.
Many electronic trading facilities that support futures trading are supported by computer-based component systems for the
order, routing, execution, matching, registration or clearing of trades. The Fund’s ability to recover certain losses may be subject to limits on liability imposed by the system provider, the market, the clearing house or member firms.
Policies and Limitations. The Fund may purchase and
sell futures contracts and options thereon in an attempt to hedge against changes in the prices of securities or, in the case of foreign currency futures and options thereon, to hedge against prevailing currency exchange rates. The Fund
will not engage in transactions in futures and options on futures for speculation.
Call Options on Securities. The Fund may write (sell) covered call options and purchase call options on securities for hedging purposes (i.e., to attempt to
reduce, at least in part, the effect on the Fund’s NAV of price fluctuations of securities held by the Fund) or non-hedging purposes. When writing call options, the Fund writes only “covered” call options. A call option is “covered” if the
Fund simultaneously holds an equivalent position in the security underlying the option. Portfolio securities on which the Fund may write and purchase call options are purchased solely on the basis of investment considerations consistent
with the Fund’s investment objectives.
When the Fund writes a call option, it is obligated to sell a security to a purchaser at a specified price at any time until a certain date if the
purchaser decides to exercise the option. The Fund will receive a premium for writing a call option. So long as the obligation of the call option continues the Fund may be assigned an exercise notice, requiring it to deliver the underlying
security against payment
of the exercise price. The Fund may be obligated to deliver securities underlying an option at less than the market price.
The writing of covered call options is a conservative investment technique that is believed to involve relatively little risk (in contrast to the
writing of “naked” or uncovered call options, which the Fund will not do), but is capable of enhancing the Fund’s total return. When writing a covered call option, the Fund, in return for the premium, gives up the opportunity for profit from
a price increase in the underlying security above the exercise price, but retains the risk of loss should the price of the security decline.
If a call option that the Fund has written expires unexercised, the Fund will realize a gain in the amount of the premium; however, that gain may
be offset by a decline in the market value of the underlying security during the option period. If a call option that the Fund has written is exercised, the Fund will realize a gain or loss from the sale of the underlying security.
When the Fund purchases a call option, it pays a premium to the writer for the right to purchase a security from the writer for a specified amount
at any time until a certain date. The Fund generally would purchase a call option to offset a previously written call option or to protect itself against an increase in the price of a security it intends to purchase.
Policies and Limitations. The Fund may write covered call options and may purchase call options on securities. The Fund may also write covered call options and may purchase call options in related closing transactions. The Fund writes only “covered” call
options on securities it owns (in contrast to the writing of “naked” or uncovered call options, which the Fund will not do).
The Fund would purchase a call option to offset a previously written call option. The Fund also may purchase a call option
to protect against an increase in the price of the securities it intends to purchase.
Put Options on Securities. The
Fund may write (sell) and purchase put options on securities for hedging purposes (i.e., to attempt to reduce, at least in part, the effect on the Fund’s
NAV of price fluctuations of securities held by the Fund) or non-hedging purposes. Portfolio securities on which the Fund may write and purchase put options are purchased solely on the basis of investment considerations consistent with the
Fund’s investment objectives.
When the Fund writes a put option, it is obligated to acquire a security at a certain price at any time until a certain date if the purchaser
decides to exercise the option. The Fund will receive a premium for writing a put option. When writing a put option, the Fund, in return for the premium, takes the risk that it must purchase the underlying security at a price that may be
higher than the current market price of the security. If a put option that the Fund has written expires unexercised, the Fund will realize a gain in the amount of the premium.
When the Fund purchases a put option, it pays a premium to the writer for the right to sell a security to the writer for a specified amount at any
time until a certain date. The Fund generally would purchase a put option to protect itself against a decrease in the market value of a security it owns.
Policies and Limitations. The Fund generally writes and purchases put options on securities for hedging purposes (e.g., to reduce, at least in part, the effect of price
fluctuations of securities the Fund holds on its NAV).
General Information About Options on Securities. The exercise price of an option may be below, equal to, or above the market value of the underlying security at the time the option is written. Options normally have expiration dates between three and nine months
from the date written. American-style options are exercisable at any time prior to their expiration date. European-style options are exercisable only
immediately prior to their expiration date. The obligation under any option written by the Fund terminates upon expiration of the option or, at an earlier time, when the Fund offsets the option by entering into a “closing purchase
transaction” to purchase an option of the same series. If an option is purchased by the Fund and is never exercised or closed out, the Fund will lose the entire amount of the premium paid.
Options are traded both on U.S. national securities exchanges and in the OTC market. Options also are traded on non-U.S. exchanges. Exchange-traded
options are issued by a clearing organization affiliated with the exchange on which the option is listed; the clearing organization in effect guarantees completion of every exchange-traded option. In contrast, OTC options are contracts
between the Fund and a counterparty, with no clearing organization guarantee. Thus, when the Fund sells (or purchases) an OTC option, it generally will be able to “close out” the option prior to its expiration only by entering into a closing
transaction with the dealer to whom (or from whom) the Fund originally sold (or purchased) the option. There can be no assurance that the Fund would be able to liquidate an OTC option at any time prior to expiration. Unless the Fund is able
to effect a closing purchase transaction in a covered OTC call option it has written, it will not be able to liquidate securities used as cover until the option expires or is exercised or until different cover is substituted. In the event of
the counterparty’s insolvency, the Fund may be unable to liquidate its options position and the associated cover. The Manager monitors the creditworthiness of dealers with which the Fund may engage in OTC options transactions.
The premium the Fund receives (or pays) when it writes (or purchases) an option is the amount at which the option is currently traded on the
applicable market. The premium may reflect, among other things, the current market price of the underlying security, the relationship of the exercise price to the market price, the historical price volatility of the underlying security, the
length of the option period, the general supply of and demand for credit, and the interest rate environment. The premium the Fund receives when it writes an option is recorded as a liability on the Fund’s statement of assets and liabilities.
This liability is adjusted daily to the option’s current market value.
Closing transactions are effected in order to realize a profit (or minimize a loss) on an outstanding option, to prevent an underlying security
from being called, or to permit the sale or the put of the underlying security. Furthermore, effecting a closing transaction permits the Fund to write another call option on the underlying security with a different exercise price or
expiration date or both. There is, of course, no assurance that the Fund will be able to effect closing transactions at favorable prices. If the Fund cannot enter into such a transaction, it may be required to hold a security that it might
otherwise have sold (or purchase a security that it might otherwise not have bought), in which case it would continue to be at market risk on the security.
The Fund will realize a profit or loss from a closing purchase transaction if the cost of the transaction is less or more than the premium received
from writing the call or put option. Because
increases in the market price of a call option generally reflect increases in the market price of the underlying security, any loss resulting from the repurchase of a
call option is likely to be offset, in whole or in part, by appreciation of the underlying security owned by the Fund; however, the Fund could be in a less advantageous position than if it had not written the call option.
The Fund pays brokerage commissions or spreads in connection with purchasing or writing options, including those used to close out existing
positions. From time to time, the Fund may purchase an underlying security for delivery in accordance with an exercise notice of a call option assigned to it, rather than deliver the security from its inventory. In those cases, additional
brokerage commissions are incurred.
The hours of trading for options may not conform to the hours during which the underlying securities are traded. To the extent
that the options markets close before the markets for the underlying securities close, significant price and rate movements can take place in the underlying markets that cannot be reflected in the options markets.
Additionally, volatility in the market for equity securities, which can impact a single stock or certain segments of stocks
and can happen suddenly, can meaningfully increase the risk of loss associated with options.
Put and Call Options on Securities Indices and Other Financial Indices. The Fund may write (sell) and purchase put and call options on securities indices and other financial indices for
hedging or non-hedging purposes. In so doing, the Fund can pursue many of the same objectives it would pursue through the purchase and sale of options on individual securities or other instruments.
Options on securities indices and other financial indices are similar to options on a security or other instrument except that, rather than
settling by physical delivery of the underlying instrument, options on indices settle by cash settlement; that is, an option on an index gives the holder the right to receive, upon exercise of the option, an amount of cash if the closing
level of the index upon which the option is based is greater than, in the case of a call, or is less than, in the case of a put, the exercise price of the option (except if, in the case of an OTC option, physical delivery is specified). This
amount of cash is equal to the difference between the closing price of the index and the exercise price of the option times a specified multiple (multiplier), which determines the total dollar value for each point of such difference. The
seller of the option is obligated, in return for the premium received, to make delivery of this amount.
A securities index fluctuates with changes in the market values of the securities included in the index. The gain or loss on an option on an index
depends on price movements in the instruments comprising the market, market segment, industry or other composite on which the underlying index is based, rather than price movements in individual securities, as is the case with respect to
options on securities. The risks of investment in options on indices may be greater than the risks of investment in options on securities.
The effectiveness of hedging through the purchase of securities index options will depend upon the extent to which price movements in the
securities being hedged correlate with price movements in the selected securities index. Perfect correlation is not possible because the securities held or to be
acquired by the Fund will not exactly match the composition of the securities indices on which options are available.
For purposes of managing cash flow, the Fund may purchase put and call options on securities indices to increase its exposure to the performance of
a recognized securities index.
Securities index options have characteristics and risks similar to those of securities options, as discussed herein. Certain securities index
options are traded in the OTC market and involve liquidity and credit risks that may not be present in the case of exchange-traded securities index options.
Policies and Limitations. For purposes of managing cash flow, the Fund may purchase put and call options on securities indices to increase the Fund’s exposure to the performance of a recognized
securities index, such as the S&P 500 Index. All securities index options purchased by the Fund will be listed and traded on an exchange.
Options on Foreign Currencies. The
Fund may write (sell) and purchase covered call and put options on foreign currencies for hedging or non-hedging purposes. The Fund may use options on foreign currencies to protect against decreases in the U.S. dollar value of securities
held or increases in the U.S. dollar cost of securities to be acquired by the Fund or to protect the U.S. dollar equivalent of dividends, interest, or other payments on those securities. In addition, the Fund may write and purchase covered
call and put options on foreign currencies for non-hedging purposes (e.g., when the Manager anticipates that a foreign currency will appreciate or
depreciate in value, but securities denominated in that currency do not present attractive investment opportunities and are not held in the Fund’s investment portfolio). The Fund may write covered call and put options on any currency in
order to realize greater income than would be realized on portfolio securities alone.
Currency options have characteristics and risks similar to those of securities options, as discussed herein. Certain options on foreign currencies
are traded on the OTC market and involve liquidity and credit risks that may not be present in the case of exchange-traded currency options.
Policies and Limitations. The Fund may enter into forward contracts for the purpose of hedging and not for speculation.
Forward Foreign Currency Transactions. The Fund may enter into contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific currency at a future date, which may be any fixed number of days in excess of two days from the date of the contract agreed upon by the parties, at a price set
at the time of the contract (“forward currency contracts”) for hedging or non-hedging purposes. The Fund also may engage in foreign currency transactions on a spot basis (i.e., cash transaction that results in actual delivery within two days) at the spot rate prevailing in the foreign currency market.
The Fund may enter into forward currency contracts in an attempt to hedge against changes in prevailing currency exchange
rates (i.e., as a means of establishing more definitely the effective return on, or the purchase price of, securities denominated in foreign currencies). The Fund may also enter into forward currency
contracts to protect against decreases in the U.S. dollar value of securities held or increases in the U.S. dollar cost of securities to be acquired by the Fund or to protect the U.S. dollar equivalent of dividends, interest, or other
payments on those securities. In addition, the Fund may enter into forward currency contracts for non-hedging purposes when the Manager anticipates that a foreign currency will appreciate or depreciate in value, but securities denominated in
that currency do not
present attractive investment opportunities and are not held in the Fund’s investment portfolio. The cost to the Fund of engaging in forward
currency contracts varies with factors such as the currency involved, the length of the contract period, and the market conditions then prevailing.
Sellers or purchasers of forward currency contracts can enter into offsetting closing transactions, similar to closing
transactions on futures, by purchasing or selling, respectively, an instrument identical to the instrument sold or bought, respectively. Secondary markets generally do not exist for forward currency contracts, however, with the result that
closing transactions generally can be made for forward currency contracts only by negotiating directly with the counterparty. Thus, there can be no assurance that the Fund will in fact be able to close out a forward currency contract at a
favorable price prior to maturity. In addition, in the event of insolvency of the counterparty, the Fund might be unable to close out a forward currency contract at any time prior to maturity. In either event, the Fund would continue to be
subject to market risk with respect to the position, and would continue to be required to maintain a position in the securities or currencies that are the subject of the hedge or to maintain cash or securities.
The precise matching of forward currency contract amounts and the value of the securities involved generally will not be
possible because the value of such securities, measured in the foreign currency, will change after the forward currency contract has been established. Thus, the Fund might need to purchase or sell foreign currencies in the spot (cash) market
to the extent such foreign currencies are not covered by forward currency contracts. The projection of short-term currency market movements is extremely difficult, and the successful execution of a short-term hedging strategy is highly
uncertain.
The Manager believes that the use of foreign currency hedging techniques, including “proxy-hedges,” can provide significant
protection of NAV in the event of a general increase or decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies. For example, the return available from securities denominated in a particular foreign currency would decline if the
value of the U.S. dollar increased against that currency. Such a decline could be partially or completely offset by an increase in the value of a hedge involving a forward currency contract to sell that foreign currency or a proxy-hedge
involving a forward currency contract to sell a different foreign currency whose behavior is expected to resemble the behavior of the currency in which the securities being hedged are denominated but which is available on more advantageous
terms.
However, a hedge or a proxy-hedge cannot protect against exchange rate risks perfectly and, if the Manager is incorrect in its judgment of future
exchange rate relationships, the Fund could be in a less advantageous position than if such a hedge had not been established. If the Fund uses proxy-hedging, it may experience losses on both the currency in which it has invested and the
currency used for hedging if the two currencies do not vary with the expected degree of correlation. Using forward currency contracts to protect the value of the Fund’s securities against a decline in the value of a currency does not
eliminate fluctuations in the prices of the underlying securities. Because forward currency contracts may not be traded on an exchange, the assets used to cover such contracts may be illiquid. The Fund may experience delays in the settlement
of its foreign currency transactions.
Forward currency contracts in which the Fund may engage include foreign exchange forwards. The consummation of a foreign exchange forward requires
the actual exchange of the principal amounts of the two currencies in the contract (i.e., settlement on a physical basis). Because foreign exchange forwards are physically settled through an exchange
of currencies, they are traded in the interbank market directly between currency traders (usually large commercial banks) and their customers. A foreign exchange forward generally has no deposit requirement, and no commissions are charged at
any
stage for trades; foreign exchange dealers realize a profit based on the difference (the spread) between the prices at which they are buying and the prices at which
they are selling various currencies. When the Fund enters into a foreign exchange forward, it relies on the counterparty to make or take delivery of the underlying currency at the maturity of the contract. Failure by the counterparty to do so
would result in the loss of any expected benefit of the transaction.
The Fund may be required to obtain the currency that it must deliver under the foreign exchange forward through the sale of portfolio securities
denominated in such currency or through conversion of other assets of the Fund into such currency. When the Fund engages in foreign currency transactions for hedging purposes, it will not enter into foreign exchange forwards to sell currency
or maintain a net exposure to such contracts if their consummation would obligate the Fund to deliver an amount of foreign currency materially in excess of the value of its portfolio securities or other assets denominated in that currency.
Forward currency contracts in which the Fund may engage also include non-deliverable forwards (“NDFs”). NDFs are cash-settled, short-term forward
contracts on foreign currencies (each a “Reference Currency”) that are non-convertible and that may be thinly traded or illiquid. NDFs involve an obligation to pay an amount (the “Settlement Amount”) equal to the difference between the
prevailing market exchange rate for the Reference Currency and the agreed upon exchange rate (the “NDF Rate”), with respect to an agreed notional amount. NDFs have a fixing date and a settlement (delivery) date. The fixing date is the date
and time at which the difference between the prevailing market exchange rate and the agreed upon exchange rate is calculated. The settlement (delivery) date is the date by which the payment of the Settlement Amount is due to the party
receiving payment.
Although NDFs are similar to forward exchange forwards, NDFs do not require physical delivery of the Reference Currency on the
settlement date. Rather, on the settlement date, the only transfer between the counterparties is the monetary settlement amount representing the difference between the NDF Rate and the prevailing market exchange rate. NDFs typically may have
terms from one month up to two years and are settled in U.S. dollars.
NDFs are subject to many of the risks associated with derivatives in general and forward currency transactions, including
risks associated with fluctuations in foreign currency and the risk that the counterparty will fail to fulfill its obligations. Although NDFs have historically been traded OTC, in the future, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, they may be
exchange-traded. Under such circumstances, they may be centrally cleared and a secondary market for them will exist. With respect to NDFs that are centrally-cleared, an investor could lose margin payments it has deposited with the clearing
organization as well as the net amount of gains not yet paid by the clearing organization if the clearing organization breaches its obligations under the NDF, becomes insolvent or goes into bankruptcy. In the event of bankruptcy of the
clearing organization, the investor may be entitled to the net amount of gains the investor is entitled to receive plus the return of margin owed to it only in proportion to the amount received by the clearing organization’s other customers,
potentially resulting in losses to the investor. Even if some NDFs remain traded OTC, they will be subject to margin requirements for uncleared swaps and counterparty risk common to other swaps, as discussed below.
The Fund may purchase securities of an issuer domiciled in a country other than the country in whose currency the securities are denominated.
Swap Agreements. The Fund may enter into swap agreements to manage or gain exposure to particular types of investments (including commodities, equity securities, interest
rates or indices of equity securities in which the Fund otherwise could not invest efficiently).
Swap agreements historically have been individually negotiated and structured to include exposure to a variety of different
types of investments or market factors. Swap agreements are two party contracts entered into primarily by institutional investors. Swap agreements can vary in term like other fixed-income investments. Most swap agreements are currently traded
over-the-counter. In a standard “swap” transaction, two parties agree to exchange one or more payments based, for example, on the returns (or differentials in rates of return) earned or realized on particular predetermined investments or
instruments (such as securities, indices, or other financial or economic interests). The gross payments to be exchanged (or “swapped”) between the parties are calculated with respect to a notional amount, which is the predetermined dollar
principal of the trade representing the hypothetical underlying quantity upon which payment obligations are computed. If a swap agreement provides for payment in different currencies, the parties may agree to exchange the principal amount. A
swap also includes an instrument that is dependent on the occurrence, nonoccurrence or the extent of the occurrence of an event or contingency associated with a potential financial, economic or commercial consequence, such as a credit default
swap.
Depending on how they are used, swap agreements may increase or decrease the overall volatility of the Fund’s investments and
its share price and yield. Swap agreements are subject to liquidity risk, meaning that the Fund may be unable to sell a swap agreement to a third party at a favorable price. Swap agreements may involve leverage and may be highly volatile;
depending on how they are used, they may have a considerable impact on the Fund’s performance. The risks of swap agreements depend upon the Fund’s ability to terminate its swap agreements or reduce its exposure through offsetting
transactions. Swaps are highly specialized instruments that require investment techniques and risk analyses different from those associated with stocks, bonds, and other traditional investments.
Some swaps currently are, and more in the future will be, centrally cleared. Swaps that are centrally cleared are subject to
the creditworthiness of the clearing organization involved in the transaction. For example, an investor could lose margin payments it has deposited with its futures commission merchant as well as the net amount of gains not yet paid by the
clearing organization if the clearing organization becomes insolvent or goes into bankruptcy. In the event of bankruptcy of the clearing organization, the investor may be entitled to the net amount of gains the investor is entitled to receive
plus the return of margin owed to it only in proportion to the amount received by the clearing organization’s other customers, potentially resulting in losses to the investor.
To the extent a swap is not centrally cleared, the use of a swap involves the risk that a loss may be sustained as a result of
the insolvency or bankruptcy of the counterparty or the failure of the counterparty to make required payments or otherwise comply with the terms of the agreement. If a counterparty’s creditworthiness declines, the value of the swap might
decline, potentially resulting in losses to the Fund. Changing conditions in a particular market area, whether or not directly related to the referenced assets that underlie the swap agreement, may have an adverse impact on the
creditworthiness of the counterparty. If a default occurs by the counterparty to such a transaction, the Fund may have contractual remedies pursuant to the agreements related to the transaction.
The regulation of the U.S. and non-U.S. swaps markets has undergone substantial change in recent years. Although the CFTC
released final rules relating to clearing, reporting, recordkeeping and
registration requirements under the legislation, many of the provisions of Dodd-Frank Act are subject to further final rule making or phase-in
periods, and thus their ultimate impact remains unclear. New regulations could, among other things, restrict the Fund’s ability to engage in swap transactions (for example, by making certain types of swaps no longer available to the Fund)
and/or increase the costs of such swap transactions (for example, by increasing margin or capital requirements), and the Fund might be unable to fully execute its investment strategies as a result. Limits or restrictions applicable to the
counterparties with which the Fund engages in swaps also could prevent the Fund from using these instruments or affect the pricing or other factors relating to these instruments, or may change the availability of certain investments.
Regulations adopted by the CFTC, SEC and banking regulators may require the Fund to post margin on OTC swaps, and exchanges
will set minimum margin requirements for exchange-traded and cleared swaps. The prudential regulators issued final rules that will require banks subject to their supervision to exchange variation and initial margin in respect of their
obligations arising under OTC swap agreements. The CFTC adopted similar rules that apply to CFTC-registered swap dealers that are not banks. Such rules generally require the Fund to segregate additional assets in order to meet the new
variation and initial margin requirements when they enter into OTC swap agreements. The European Supervisory Authorities (“ESA”), various national regulators in Europe, the Australian Securities & Investment Commission, the Japanese
Financial Services Agency and the Canadian Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions adopted rules and regulations that are similar to that of the Federal Reserve. The variation margin requirements are now effective and the
initial margin requirements are being phased-in through 2022 based on average daily aggregate notional amount of covered swaps between swap dealers and swap entities. Due to these regulations, the Fund could be required to engage in greater
documentation and recordkeeping with respect to swap agreements.
Separately, on December 8, 2020, the CFTC adopted regulations allowing investment advisers for registered investment companies
and other institutional investors to apply a minimum transfer amount (“MTA”) of variation margin based upon the separately managed investment account or sleeve (“Sleeve”) that the adviser is responsible for, rather than having to calculate
the MTA across all accounts of the investor. An investment manager must abide by the following conditions: (1) any such swaps are entered into with the swap dealer by an asset manager on behalf of a Sleeve owned by the legal entity pursuant
to authority granted under an investment management agreement; (2) the swaps of such Sleeve are subject to a master netting agreement that does not permit netting of initial or variation margin obligations across Sleeves of the legal entity
that have swaps outstanding with the swap dealer; and (3) the swap dealer applies an MTA no greater than $50,000 to the initial and variation margin collection and posting obligations required of such Sleeve. As of the date of this SAI, the
banking regulators have not provided similar relief, although swaps dealers subject to a banking regulator are expected to act in a manner consistent with the relief provided by the CFTC.
Regulations adopted by the prudential regulators require certain banks to include in a range of financial contracts, including
swap agreements, terms delaying or restricting default, termination and other rights in the event that the bank and/or its affiliates become subject to certain types of resolution or insolvency proceedings. The regulations could limit the
Fund’s ability to exercise a range of cross-default rights if its counterparty, or an affiliate of the counterparty, is subject to bankruptcy or similar proceedings. Such regulations could further negatively impact the Fund’s use of swaps.
Swap agreements can take many different forms and are known by a variety of names including, but not limited to, interest rate swaps, mortgage
swaps, total return swaps, inflation swaps, asset swaps (where parties exchange assets, typically a debt security), currency swaps, equity swaps, credit default
swaps, commodity-linked swaps, and contracts for differences. The Fund may also write (sell) and purchase options on swaps (swaptions).
Interest Rate Swaps, Mortgage Swaps, and Interest Rate “Caps,”
“Floors,” and “Collars.” In a typical interest rate swap agreement, one party agrees to make regular
payments equal to a floating rate on a specified amount in exchange for payments equal to a fixed rate, or a different floating rate, on the same amount for a specified period. Mortgage swap agreements are similar to interest rate swap
agreements, except the notional principal amount is tied to a reference pool of mortgages or index of mortgages. In an interest rate cap or floor, one party agrees, usually in return for a fee, to make payments under particular
circumstances. For example, the purchaser of an interest rate cap has the right to receive payments to the extent a specified interest rate exceeds an agreed level; the purchaser of an interest rate floor has the right to receive payments
to the extent a specified interest rate falls below an agreed level. An interest rate collar entitles the purchaser to receive payments to the extent a specified interest rate falls outside an agreed range.
Among other techniques, the Fund may use interest rate swaps to offset declines in the value of fixed
income securities held by the Fund. In such an instance, the Fund may agree with a counterparty to pay a fixed rate (multiplied by a notional amount) and the counterparty to pay a floating rate multiplied by the same notional amount. If
long-term interest rates rise, resulting in a diminution in the value of the Fund’s portfolio, the Fund would receive payments under the swap that would offset, in whole or in part, such diminution in value; if interest rates fall, the Fund
would likely lose money on the swap transaction. The Fund may also enter into constant maturity swaps, which are a variation of the typical interest rate swap. Constant maturity swaps are exposed to changes in long-term interest rate
movements.
Total Return Swaps. The Fund may enter into total return swaps (“TRS”) to obtain exposure to a security or market without owning or taking physical custody of such security or market. The Fund may be either a total return receiver or
a total return payer. Generally, the total return payer sells to the total return receiver an amount equal to all cash flows and price appreciation on a defined security or asset payable at periodic times during the swap term (i.e., credit
risk) in return for a periodic payment from the total return receiver based on a designated index (e.g., the London Interbank Offered Rate, known as LIBOR or the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, known as SOFR) and spread, plus the amount
of any price depreciation on the reference security or asset. The total return payer does not need to own the underlying security or asset to enter into a total return swap. The final payment at the end of the swap term includes final
settlement of the current market price of the underlying reference security or asset, and payment by the applicable party for any appreciation or depreciation in value. Usually, collateral must be posted by the total return receiver to
secure the periodic interest-based and market price depreciation payments depending on the credit quality of the underlying reference security and creditworthiness of the total return receiver, and the collateral amount is marked-to-market
daily equal to the market price of the underlying reference security or asset between periodic payment dates.
TRS may effectively add leverage to the Fund’s portfolio because, in addition to its net assets, the Fund would be subject to
investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap. If the Fund is the total return receiver in a TRS, then the credit risk for an underlying asset is transferred to the Fund in exchange for its receipt of the return (appreciation) on
that asset. If the Fund is the total return payer, it is hedging the downside risk of an underlying asset but it is obligated to pay the amount of any appreciation on that asset.
Inflation Swaps. In an inflation swap, one party agrees to pay the cumulative percentage increase in a price index, such as the Consumer Price
Index, over the term of the swap (with some lag on the referenced inflation index) and the other party agrees to pay a compounded fixed rate. Inflation swaps may be used to protect the Fund’s NAV against an unexpected change in the rate of
inflation measured by an inflation index.
Currency Swaps. A currency swap involves the exchange by the Fund and another party of the cash flows on a notional amount of two or more
currencies based on the relative value differential among them, such as exchanging a right to receive a payment in foreign currency for the right to receive U.S. dollars. The Fund may enter into currency swaps (where the parties exchange
their respective rights to make or receive payments in specified currencies). Currency swap agreements may be entered into on a net basis or may involve the delivery of the entire principal value of one designated currency in exchange for
the entire principal value of another designated currency. In such cases, the entire principal value of a currency swap is subject to the risk that the counterparty will default on its contractual delivery obligations.
Equity Swaps. Equity swaps are contracts that allow one party to exchange the returns, including any dividend income, on an equity security or group of equity securities for another payment stream. Under an equity swap, payments may be made at
the conclusion of the equity swap or periodically during its term. The Fund may enter into equity swaps. An equity swap may be used to invest in a market without owning or taking physical custody of securities in circumstances in which
direct investment may be restricted for legal reasons or is otherwise deemed impractical or disadvantageous. Furthermore, equity swaps may be illiquid and the Fund may be unable to terminate its obligations when desired. In addition, the
value of some components of an equity swap (such as the dividends on a common stock) may also be sensitive to changes in interest rates.
Credit Default Swaps. In a credit default
swap, the credit default protection buyer makes periodic payments, known as premiums, to the credit default protection seller. In return, the credit default protection seller will make a payment to the credit default protection buyer upon
the occurrence of a specified credit event. A credit default swap can refer to a single issuer or asset, a basket of issuers or assets or index of assets, each known as the reference entity or underlying asset. The Fund may act as either
the buyer or the seller of a credit default swap. The Fund may buy or sell credit default protection on a basket of issuers or assets, even if a number of the underlying assets referenced in the basket are lower-quality debt securities. In
an unhedged credit default swap, the Fund buys credit default protection on a single issuer or asset, a basket of issuers or assets or index of assets without owning the underlying asset or debt issued by the reference entity. Credit
default swaps involve greater and different risks than investing directly in the referenced asset, because, in addition to market risk, credit default swaps include liquidity, counterparty and operational risk.
Credit default swaps allow the Fund to acquire or reduce credit exposure to a particular issuer, asset or basket of assets. If a swap agreement
calls for payments by the Fund, the Fund must be prepared to make such payments when due. If the Fund is the credit default protection seller, the Fund will experience a loss if a credit event occurs and the credit of the reference entity or
underlying asset has deteriorated. If the Fund is the credit default protection buyer, the Fund will be required to pay premiums to the credit default protection seller. In the case of a physically settled credit default swap in which the
Fund is the protection seller, the Fund must be prepared to pay par for and take possession of debt of a defaulted issuer delivered to the Fund by the credit default protection buyer. Any loss would be offset by the premium payments the Fund
receives as the seller of credit default protection.
Commodity-Linked Swaps. Commodity-linked swaps are two party contracts in which the parties agree to exchange the return or interest rate on one instrument for the return of a
particular commodity, commodity index or commodity futures or options contract. The payment streams are calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional amount. A one-period swap contract operates in a manner similar to a forward or
futures contract because there is an agreement to swap a commodity for cash at only one forward date. The Fund may engage in swap transactions that have more than one period and therefore more than one exchange of payments. The Fund may
invest in total return commodity swaps to gain exposure to the overall commodity markets. In a total return commodity swap, the Fund will receive the price appreciation of a commodity index, a portion of the index, or a single commodity in
exchange for paying an agreed-upon fee. If a commodity swap is for one period, the Fund will pay a fixed fee, established at the outset of the swap. However, if the term of a commodity swap is more than one period, with interim swap
payments, the Fund will pay an adjustable or floating fee. With “floating” rate, the fee is pegged to a base rate such as LIBOR or SOFR, and is adjusted each period. Therefore, if interest rates increase over the term of the swap contract,
the Fund may be required to pay a higher fee at each swap reset date.
Contracts for Differences.
The Fund may purchase contracts for differences (“CFDs”). A CFD is a form of equity swap in which its value is based on the fluctuating value of some underlying instrument (e.g., a single security, stock basket or index). A CFD is a
privately negotiated contract between two parties, buyer and seller, stipulating that the seller will pay to or receive from the buyer the difference between the nominal value of the underlying instrument at the opening of the contract and
that instrument’s value at the end of the contract. The buyer and seller are both required to post margin, which is adjusted daily, and adverse market movements against the underlying instrument may require the buyer to make additional
margin payments. The buyer will also pay to the seller a financing rate on the notional amount of the capital employed by the seller less the margin deposit. A CFD is usually terminated at the buyer’s initiative.
A CFD can be set up to take either a short or long position on the underlying instrument and enables the Fund to potentially
capture movements in the share prices of the underlying instrument without the need to own the underlying instrument. By entering into a CFD transaction, the Fund could incur losses because it would face many of the same types of risks as
owning the underlying instrument directly.
As with other types of swap transactions, CFDs also carry counterparty risk, which is the risk that the counterparty to the
CFD transaction may be unable or unwilling to make payments or to otherwise honor its financial obligations under the terms of the contract, that the parties to the transaction may disagree as to the meaning or application of contractual
terms, or that the instrument may not perform as expected. If the counterparty were to do so, the value of the contract, and of the Fund’s shares, may be reduced.
Options on Swaps (Swaptions). A swaption is an option to enter into a swap agreement. The purchaser of a swaption pays a premium for the option and obtains the right, but not the obligation, to enter into an underlying swap on agreed-upon terms. The seller of a
swaption, in exchange for the premium, becomes obligated (if the option is exercised) to enter into an underlying swap on agreed-upon terms. Depending on the terms of the particular option agreement, the Fund generally will incur a greater
degree of risk when it writes a swaption than when it purchases a swaption. When the Fund purchases a swaption, it risks losing only the amount of the premium it has paid should it decide to let the option expire unexercised.
Combined Transactions. The Fund
may enter into multiple transactions, which may include multiple options transactions, multiple interest rate transactions and any combination of options and interest rate transactions, instead of a single Financial Instrument, as part of a
single or combined strategy when, in the judgment of the Manager, it is in the best interests of the Fund to do so. A combined transaction will usually contain elements of risk that are present in each of its component transactions.
Although the Fund will normally enter into combined transactions based on the Manager’s judgment that the combined transactions will reduce risk or otherwise more effectively achieve the desired portfolio management goal, it is possible
that the combined transactions will instead increase risk or hinder achievement of the desired portfolio management goal.
Regulatory Limitations on Using Futures, Options on Futures, and Swaps. The CFTC has adopted regulations that subject registered investment companies and/or their investment advisors to regulation by the CFTC if the registered investment company invests more than a prescribed level of
its NAV in commodity futures, options on commodities or commodity futures, swaps, or other financial instruments regulated under the Commodities and Exchange Act, or if the registered investment company is marketed as a vehicle for
obtaining exposure to such commodity interests.
As discussed in more detail below, the Advisor has claimed an exclusion from CPO registration pursuant to CFTC Rule 4.5, with respect to the Fund.
To remain eligible for this exclusion, the Fund must comply with certain limitations, including limits on trading in commodity interests, and restrictions on the manner in which the Fund markets its commodity interests trading activities.
These limitations may restrict the Fund’s ability to pursue its investment strategy, increase the costs of implementing its strategy, increase its expenses and/or adversely affect its total return.
To qualify for the CFTC Rule 4.5 exclusion, the Fund is permitted to engage in unlimited “bona fide hedging” (as defined by the CFTC), but if the
Fund uses commodity interests other than for bona fide hedging purposes, the aggregate initial margin and premiums required to establish these positions, determined at the time the most recent position was established, may not exceed 5% of
the Fund’s NAV (after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such positions and excluding the amount by which options that are “in-the-money” at the time of purchase are “in-the-money”) or, alternatively, the
aggregate net notional value of non-bona fide hedging commodity interest positions, determined at the time the most recent position was established, may not exceed 100% of the Fund’s NAV (after taking into account unrealized profits and
unrealized losses on any such positions). In addition to complying with these de minimis trading limitations, to qualify for the exclusion, the Fund must satisfy a marketing test, which requires,
among other things, that the Fund not hold itself out as a vehicle for trading commodity interests.
The Fund may be exposed to commodity interests indirectly in excess of the de minimis trading
limitations described above. Such exposure may result from the Fund’s investment in other investment vehicles, such as real estate investment trusts, collateralized loan obligations, collateralized debt obligations and other securitization
vehicles that may invest directly in commodity interests. These investment vehicles are referred to collectively as “underlying investment vehicles.” The CFTC treats a fund as a commodity pool whether it invests in commodity
interests directly or indirectly through its investments in underlying investment vehicles. The CFTC staff has issued a no-action letter permitting the manager of a fund that invests in such underlying investment vehicles to defer registering
as a CPO or claiming the exclusion from the CPO definition until six months from the date on which the CFTC issues additional guidance on the application of the calculation of the de minimis trading
limitations in
the context of the CPO exemption in CFTC Regulation 4.5 (the “Deadline”). Such guidance is expected to clarify how to calculate compliance with the de minimis trading limitations given a fund’s investments in underlying investment vehicles that may cause the fund to be deemed to be indirectly trading commodity interests. The Manager has filed the
required notice to claim this no-action relief with respect to each Fund. In addition, the Manager has claimed an exclusion (under CFTC Regulation 4.5) from the CPO definition with respect to each Fund. As a result, at this time the Manager
is not required to register as a CPO with respect to any Fund and need not generally comply with the regulatory requirements otherwise applicable to a registered CPO. Prior to the Deadline, however, the Manager will determine with respect to
each Fund whether it must operate as a registered CPO or whether it can rely on an exemption or exclusion from the CPO definition. If the Manager determines that it can rely on the exclusion in CFTC Regulation 4.5 with respect to the Fund,
then the Manager, in its management of that Fund, will comply with one of the two alternative de minimis trading limitations in that regulation. Complying with
the de minimis trading limitations may restrict the Manager’s ability to use derivatives as part of the Fund’s investment strategies. Although the Manager believes that it will be able to execute each
Fund’s investment strategies within the de minimis trading limitations, the Fund’s performance could be adversely affected. If the Manager determines that it cannot rely on the exclusion in CFTC
Regulation 4.5 with respect to the Fund, then the Manager will serve as a registered CPO with respect to that Fund. CPO regulation would increase the regulatory requirements to which the Fund is subject and it is expected that it would
increase costs for the Fund.
Pursuant to authority granted under the Dodd-Frank Act, the Treasury Department issued a notice of final determination stating that foreign
exchange forwards and foreign exchange swaps, as defined in the Dodd-Frank Act and described above, should not be considered swaps for most purposes. Thus, foreign exchange forwards and foreign exchange swaps are not deemed to be commodity
interests. Therefore, if the Manager determines that it can rely on the exclusion in CFTC Regulation 4.5 with respect to the Fund, the Fund may enter into foreign exchange forwards and foreign exchange swaps without such transactions counting
against the de minimis trading limitations discussed above. Notwithstanding the Treasury Department determination, foreign exchange forwards and foreign exchange swaps (1) must be reported to swap
data repositories, (2) may be subject to business conduct standards, and (3) are subject to antifraud and anti-manipulation proscriptions of swap execution facilities. In addition, for purposes of determining whether any Fund may be subject
to initial margin requirements for uncleared swaps, the average daily aggregate notional amount of a foreign exchange forward or a foreign exchange swap must be included in the calculation of whether such Fund has a “material swaps exposure”
as defined in the regulations.
In addition, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act and regulations adopted by the CFTC in connection with implementing the Dodd-Frank Act, NDFs are deemed
to be commodity interests, including for purposes of amended CFTC Regulation 4.5, and are subject to the full array of regulations under the Dodd-Frank Act. Therefore, if the Manager determines that it can rely on the exclusion in CFTC
Regulation 4.5 with respect to the Fund, the Fund will limit its investment in NDFs as discussed above.
The staff of the CFTC has issued guidance providing that, for purposes of determining compliance with CFTC Regulation 4.5, and the de minimis
trading limitations discussed above, swaps that are centrally-cleared on the same clearing organization may be netted where appropriate, but no such netting is permitted for uncleared swaps. To the extent some NDFs remain traded OTC and are
not centrally-cleared, the absolute notional value of all such transactions, rather than the net notional value, would be counted against the de minimis trading limitations discussed above.
General Risks of Financial Instruments. The primary risks in using Financial Instruments are: (1) imperfect correlation or no correlation between changes in market value of the securities or currencies held or to be acquired by the Fund and the prices of Financial
Instruments; (2) possible lack of a liquid secondary market for Financial Instruments and the resulting inability to close out Financial Instruments when desired; (3) the fact that the skills needed to use Financial Instruments are
different from those needed to select the Fund’s securities; (4) the fact that, although use of Financial Instruments for hedging purposes can reduce the risk of loss, they also can reduce the opportunity for gain, or even result in losses,
by offsetting favorable price movements in hedged investments; (5) the possible inability of the Fund to purchase or sell a portfolio security at a time that would otherwise be favorable for it to do so, or the possible need for the Fund to
sell a portfolio security at a disadvantageous time; and (6) when traded on non-U.S. exchanges, Financial Instruments may not be regulated as rigorously as in the United States. There can be no assurance that the Fund’s use of Financial
Instruments will be successful.
In addition, Financial Instruments may contain leverage to magnify the exposure to the underlying asset or assets.
The Fund’s use of Financial Instruments may be limited by the provisions of the Code and Treasury Department regulations with which it must comply
to continue to qualify as a RIC. See “Additional Tax Information.” Financial Instruments may not be available with respect to some currencies, especially those of so-called emerging market countries.
Policies and Limitations. When hedging, the Manager intends to reduce the risk of imperfect correlation by investing only in Financial Instruments whose behavior is
expected to resemble or offset that of the Fund’s underlying securities or currency. The Manager intends to reduce the
risk that the Fund will be unable to close out Financial Instruments by entering into such transactions only if the Manager believes there will be
an active and liquid secondary market.
Accounting Considerations for Financial Instruments. When the Fund writes an
option, an amount equal to the premium it receives is included in its Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a liability. The amount of the liability is subsequently marked to market to reflect the current market value of the option
written. When the Fund purchases an option, the premium the Fund
pays is recorded as an asset in that statement and is subsequently adjusted to the current market value of the option.
In the case of a regulated futures contract the Fund purchases or sells, an amount equal to the initial margin deposit is recorded as an asset in its Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The
amount of the asset is subsequently adjusted to reflect changes in the amount of the deposit as well as changes in the value of the contract.
Borrowing and Leverage. The Fund is authorized to borrow amounts up to 33 1/3% of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) minus liabilities (other than the
amount borrowed). The use of borrowed funds involves the speculative factor known as “leverage.” The Fund currently uses leverage through bank borrowings under a committed secured credit facility, which includes a related security
agreement (the “Credit Facility”) with State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”). The Fund also may issue Preferred Stock and Notes. The issuance of Preferred Stock would permit the Fund to assume leverage in an amount up to 50% of its total assets (taking into account the effect of any outstanding Notes). The use of the Credit Facility and
any issuance of Notes permits the Fund to assume leverage in an amount up to 33 1/3% of its total assets. The borrowings under the Credit Facility
have and, if issued, Preferred Stock and Notes, would have
priority on the income and assets of the Fund over the Common Stock and have certain other rights, including for holders of Preferred Stock, with respect to voting and the election of
Directors. In certain circumstances, the net asset value of and distributions payable on Common Stock could be adversely affected by such preferences. The Fund’s leveraged capital structure creates special risks not associated with
unleveraged funds having similar investment objectives and policies. The Fund utilizes leverage only when there is an expectation that it will benefit the Fund. To the extent the income or other gain derived from securities purchased
with the proceeds of borrowings or any preferred stock issuances exceeds the interest or any distributions the Fund has to pay thereon, the Fund’s net income or other gain is greater than if
leverage had not been used. Conversely, if the income or other gain from the securities purchased through leverage is not sufficient to cover the cost of such leverage, the Fund’s total return would be less than if leverage had not
been used. If leverage is used, in certain circumstances, the Fund could be required to liquidate securities it would not otherwise sell in order to satisfy distributions or interest
obligations. The Fund may also borrow up to an additional 5% of its total assets for temporary purposes without regard to the foregoing limitations. See “Investment Objectives, Policies and Limitations.” This could include, for
example, borrowing on a short-term basis in order to facilitate the settlement of portfolio securities transactions.
When-Issued and Delayed-Delivery Securities and Forward Commitments. The Fund may purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis and may purchase or sell securities on a forward commitment basis. These transactions involve a commitment by the Fund to purchase or
sell securities at a future date (ordinarily within two months, although the Fund may agree to a longer settlement period). These transactions may involve mortgage-backed securities, such as GNMA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac certificates.
The price of the underlying securities (usually expressed in terms of yield) and the date when the securities will be delivered and paid for (the settlement date) are fixed at the time the transaction is negotiated. When-issued and
delayed-delivery purchases and forward commitment transactions are negotiated directly with the other party, and such commitments are not traded on exchanges.
When-issued and delayed-delivery purchases and forward commitment transactions enable the Fund to “lock in” what the Manager believes to be an
attractive price or yield on a particular security for a period of time, regardless of future changes in interest rates. For instance, in periods of rising interest rates and falling prices, the Fund might sell securities it owns on a forward
commitment basis to limit its exposure to falling prices. In periods of falling interest rates and rising prices, the Fund might purchase a security on a when-issued, delayed-delivery or forward commitment basis and sell a similar security to
settle such purchase, thereby obtaining the benefit of currently higher yields. When-issued, delayed-delivery and forward commitment transactions are subject to the risk that the counterparty may fail to complete the purchase or sale of the
security. If this occurs, the Fund may lose the opportunity to purchase or sell the security at the agreed upon price. To reduce this risk, the Fund will enter into transactions with established counterparties and the Manager will monitor the
creditworthiness of such counterparties.
The value of securities purchased on a when-issued, delayed-delivery or forward commitment basis and any subsequent fluctuations in their value are
reflected in the computation of the Fund’s NAV starting on the date of the agreement to purchase the securities. Because the Fund has not yet paid for the securities, this produces an effect similar to leverage. The Fund does not earn
interest on securities it has committed to purchase until the securities are paid for and delivered on the settlement date.
Because the Fund is committed to buying them at a certain price, any change in the value of these securities, even prior to their issuance, affects the value of the
Fund’s interests. The purchase of securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis also involves a risk of loss if the value of the security to be purchased declines before the settlement date. When the Fund makes a forward commitment to
sell securities it owns, the proceeds to be received upon settlement are included in that Fund’s assets. Fluctuations in the market value of the underlying securities are not reflected in the Fund’s NAV as long as the commitment to sell
remains in effect.
When-issued, delayed-delivery and forward commitment transactions may cause the Fund to liquidate positions when it may not be advantageous to do
so in order to satisfy its purchase or sale obligations.
The Fund will purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis or purchase or sell securities on a forward
commitment basis only with the intention of completing the transaction and actually purchasing or selling the securities. If deemed advisable as a matter of investment strategy, however, the Fund may dispose of or renegotiate a commitment
after it has been entered into. The Fund also may sell securities it has committed to purchase before those securities are delivered to the Fund on the settlement date. The Fund may realize capital gains or losses in connection with these
transactions.
The Fund may also enter into a TBA agreement and “roll over” such agreement prior to the settlement date by selling the
obligation to purchase the pools set forth in the agreement and entering into a new TBA agreement for future delivery of pools of mortgage-backed securities. TBA mortgage-backed securities may increase prepayment risks because the underlying
mortgages may be less favorable than anticipated by the Fund.
Policies and Limitations. The Fund will purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis only with the intention of completing the transaction and actually
taking delivery of the securities. If deemed advisable as a matter of investment strategy, however, the Fund may
dispose of or renegotiate a commitment after it has been entered into. The Fund also may sell securities it has committed to purchase before those
securities are delivered to the Fund on the settlement date. The Fund may realize capital gains or losses in connection with these transactions. Depending on the terms of the when-issued, delayed-delivery and forward commitment
transactions, these transactions may meet the definition of a derivatives transaction under Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act and, if they do, they will be subject to the requirements of that rule.
Structured Notes. The Fund may invest in structured notes, such as participatory notes, credit linked notes and securities (“CLNs”), exchange-traded notes (“ETNs”) and other related instruments. These instruments are notes where the principal and/or
interest rate or value of the structured note is determined by reference to the performance of an underlying indicator. Underlying indicators may include a security or other financial instrument, asset, currency, interest rate, credit
rating, commodity, volatility measure or index. Generally, investments in such notes are used as a substitute for positions in underlying indicators. The interest and/or principal payments that may be made on a structured note may vary
widely, depending on a variety of factors, including the volatility of the underlying indicator. The performance results of structured notes will not replicate exactly the performance of the underlying indicator that the notes seek to
replicate due to transaction costs and other expenses. Issuers of structured notes can vary and may include corporations, banks, broker-dealers and limited purpose trusts or other vehicles. Structured notes may be exchange traded or
traded OTC and privately negotiated.
Investments in structured notes involve many of the same risks associated with a direct investment in the underlying indicator
the notes seek to replicate. Structured notes may be considered hybrid instruments as they may exhibit features of both fixed income securities and derivatives. The return on a structured note that is linked to a particular underlying
indicator that pays dividends generally is increased to the extent of any dividends paid in connection with the underlying indicator. However, the holder of a structured note typically does not receive voting rights and other rights as it
would if it directly owned the underlying indicator. In addition, structured notes are subject to counterparty risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the structured note will not fulfill its contractual obligation to complete the
transaction with the Fund. Structured notes constitute general unsecured contractual obligations of the issuer of the note and the Fund is relying on the creditworthiness of such issuer and has no rights under a structured note against the
issuer of an underlying indicator. Structured notes involve transaction costs. Structured notes may be considered illiquid and, therefore, structured notes considered illiquid will be subject to the Fund’s percentage limitation on investments
in illiquid securities.
CLNs are typically issued by a limited purpose trust or other vehicle (the “CLN trust”) that, in turn, invests in a derivative or basket of
derivatives instruments, such as credit default swaps, interest rate swaps and/or other securities, in order to provide exposure to certain high yield, sovereign debt, emerging markets, or other fixed income markets. Generally, investments in
CLNs represent the right to receive periodic income payments (in the form of distributions) and payment of principal at the end of the term of the CLN. However, these payments are conditioned on the CLN trust’s receipt of payments from, and
the CLN trust’s potential obligations, to the counterparties to the derivative instruments and other securities in which the CLN trust invests. For example, the CLN trust may sell one or more credit default swaps, under which the CLN trust
would receive a stream of payments over the term of the swap agreements provided that no event of default has occurred with respect to the referenced debt obligation upon which the swap is based. If a default were to occur, the stream of
payments may stop and the CLN trust would be obligated to pay the counterparty the par (or other agreed upon value) of the referenced debt obligation. This, in turn, would reduce the amount of income and principal that the Fund would receive
as an investor in the CLN trust.
The Fund may enter in CLNs to gain access to sovereign debt and securities in emerging markets, particularly in markets where the Fund is not able
to purchase securities directly due to domicile restrictions or tax restrictions or tariffs. In such an instance, the issuer of the CLN may purchase the reference security directly and/or gain exposure through a credit default swap or other
derivative.
The Fund’s investments in CLNs are subject to the risks associated with the underlying reference obligations and derivative instruments, including,
among others, credit risk, default risk, counterparty risk, interest rate risk, leverage risk and management risk.
Structured notes may also include exchange-traded notes (“ETNs”), which are typically unsecured and unsubordinated like other
structured notes. ETN returns are based upon the performance of one or more underlying indicators and typically, no periodic coupon payments are distributed and no principal protections exists, even at maturity. ETNs are listed on an
exchange and traded in the secondary market. An ETN can be held until maturity, at which time the issuer pays the investor a cash amount equal to the principal amount, subject to the day’s market benchmark or strategy factor. When the Fund
invests in ETNs, it will bear its proportionate share of any fees and expenses borne by the ETN. Because fees reduce the amount of return at maturity or upon redemption, if the value of the
underlying indicator decreases or does not increase significantly, the Fund may receive less than the principal amount of its investment at
maturity or upon redemption. In addition, the value of an ETN also may be influenced by time to maturity, level of supply and demand for the ETN, volatility and lack of liquidity in underlying indicator, changes in the applicable interest
rates, and economic, legal, political, or geographic events that affect the underlying indicator. Some ETNs that use leverage can, at times, be relatively illiquid, and thus they may be difficult to purchase or sell at a fair price. Leveraged
ETNs are subject to the same risk as other instruments that use leverage in any form. There may be restrictions on the Fund’s right to redeem its investment in an ETN, which are generally meant to be held until maturity. A decision by the
Fund to sell ETN holdings may be limited by the availability of a secondary market. In addition, although an ETN may be listed on an exchange, the issuer may not be required to maintain the listing, and there can be no assurance that a
secondary market will exist for an ETN.
Equity Securities. Equity securities in which the Fund may invest include common stocks, preferred stocks, convertible securities and warrants. Common stocks and preferred stocks
represent shares of ownership in a corporation. Preferred stocks usually have specific dividends and rank after bonds and before common stock in claims on assets of the corporation should it be dissolved. Increases and decreases in earnings
are usually reflected in a corporation’s stock price. Convertible securities are debt or preferred equity securities convertible into common stock. Usually, convertible securities pay dividends or interest at rates higher than common stock,
but lower than other securities. Convertible securities usually participate to some extent in the appreciation or depreciation of the underlying stock into which they are convertible. Warrants are options to buy a stated number of shares of
common stock at a specified price anytime during the life of the warrants.
To the extent the Fund invests in such securities, the value of securities held by the Fund will be affected by changes in the
stock markets, which may be the result of domestic or international political or economic news, changes in interest rates or changing investor sentiment. At times, the stock markets can be volatile and stock prices can change substantially.
Because some investors purchase equity securities with borrowed money, an increase in interest rates can cause a decline in equity prices. The equity securities of smaller companies are more sensitive to these changes than those of larger
companies. This market risk will affect the Fund’s NAV per share, which will fluctuate as the value of the securities held by the Fund changes. Not all stock prices change uniformly or at the same time and not all stock markets move in the
same direction at the same time. Other factors affect a particular stock’s prices, such as poor earnings reports by an issuer, loss of major customers, major litigation against an issuer, or changes in governmental regulations affecting an
industry. Adverse news affecting one company can sometimes depress the stock prices of all companies in the same industry. Not all factors can be predicted.
Terrorism Risks. The terrorist attacks in the United States on September 11, 2001, had a disruptive effect on the U.S. economy and financial markets. Terrorist
attacks and other geopolitical events have led to, and may in the future lead to, increased short-term market volatility and may have long-term effects on U.S. and world economies and financial markets. Those events could also have an acute
effect on individual issuers, related groups of issuers, or issuers concentrated in a single geographic area. A similar disruption of the financial markets or
other terrorist attacks could adversely impact interest rates, auctions, secondary trading, ratings, credit risk, inflation and other factors relating to portfolio securities and adversely affect Fund service providers and the Fund’s
operations.
Recent Market Conditions. Both U.S. and international markets have experienced significant volatility in recent months and years. As a result of such volatility, investment returns may fluctuate
significantly. National economies are substantially interconnected, as are
global financial markets, which creates the possibility that conditions in one country or region might adversely impact issuers in a different country or region. However, the interconnectedness of economies and/or markets may be
diminishing, which may impact such economies and markets in ways that cannot be foreseen at this time.
Although interest rates were unusually low in recent years in the U.S. and abroad, recently, the
Federal Reserve and certain foreign central banks began to raise interest rates as part of their efforts to address rising inflation. In addition, ongoing inflation pressures from tight labor markets and supply chain disruptions could
continue to cause an increase in interest rates and/or negatively impact companies. It is difficult to accurately predict the pace at which interest rates might increase, or the timing, frequency or magnitude of any such increases in
interest rates. Additionally, various economic and political factors could cause the Federal Reserve or other foreign central banks to change their approach in the future and such actions may result in an economic slowdown both in the U.S.
and abroad. Unexpected increases in interest rates could lead to market volatility or reduce liquidity in certain sectors of the market. Deteriorating economic fundamentals may, in turn, increase the risk of default or insolvency of
particular issuers, negatively impact market value, cause credit spreads to widen, and reduce bank balance sheets. Any of these could cause an increase in market volatility or reduce liquidity across various markets. Also, regulators have
expressed concern that rate increases may cause investors to sell fixed income securities faster than the market can absorb them, contributing to price volatility. Over the longer term, rising interest rates may present a greater risk than
has historically been the case due to the prior period of relatively low rates and the effect of government fiscal and monetary policy initiatives and potential market reaction to those initiatives, or their alteration or cessation.
Historical patterns of correlation among asset classes may break down in unanticipated ways during times of high volatility, disrupting investment programs and potentially causing losses.
Some countries, including the U.S., have in recent years adopted more protectionist trade policies.
Slowing global economic growth, the rise in protectionist trade policies, changes to some major international trade agreements, risks associated with the trade agreement between the United Kingdom and the European Union, and the risks
associated with ongoing trade negotiations with China, could affect the economies of many nations in ways that cannot necessarily be foreseen at the present time. In addition, the current strength of the U.S. dollar may decrease foreign
demand for U.S. assets, which could have a negative impact on certain issuers and/or industries.
Regulators in the U.S. have proposed a number of changes to regulations involving the markets and
issuers, some of which implicate the Fund. While it is not currently known whether any of these regulations will be adopted, due to the current scope of regulations being proposed, any changes to regulation could limit the Fund’s ability to
pursue its investment strategies or make certain investments, may make it more costly for it to operate, or adversely impact its performance.
Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine, and corresponding events in late February 2022, have had, and could
continue to have, severe adverse effects on regional and global economic markets for securities and commodities. Following Russia’s actions, various governments, including the United States, have issued broad-ranging economic sanctions
against Russia, including, among other actions, a prohibition on doing business with certain Russian companies, large financial institutions, officials and oligarchs; the removal by certain countries and the European Union of selected Russian
banks from the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications (“SWIFT”), the electronic banking network that connects banks globally; and restrictive measures to prevent the Russian Central Bank from undermining the impact of
the sanctions. The current events, including sanctions and the potential for future sanctions, including any impacting Russia’s energy sector, and other actions, and Russia’s retaliatory responses to those sanctions and actions, may continue
to adversely impact the Russian economy and economies of surrounding countries and may result in the further decline of the value and liquidity of Russian securities and securities of surrounding countries, a continued weakening of currencies
in the region and continued exchange closures, and may have other adverse consequences on the economies of countries in the region that could impact the value of investments in the region and impair the ability of the Fund to buy, sell,
receive or deliver securities of companies in the region or the Fund’s ability to collect interest payments on fixed income securities in the region. Moreover, those
events have, and could continue to have, an adverse effect on global markets performance and liquidity, thereby negatively
affecting the value of the Fund’s investments beyond any direct exposure to issuers in the region. The duration of ongoing hostilities and the vast array of sanctions and related events cannot be predicted. Those events present material
uncertainty and risk with respect to markets globally and the performance of the Fund and its investments or operations could be negatively impacted.
Certain illnesses spread rapidly and have the potential to significantly and adversely affect the global
economy. Outbreaks such as the novel coronavirus, COVID-19, or other similarly infectious diseases may have material adverse impacts on the Fund. Epidemics and/or pandemics, such as the coronavirus, have and may further result in, among other
things, closing borders, extended quarantines and stay-at-home orders, order cancellations, disruptions to supply chains and customer activity, widespread business closures and layoffs, as well as general concern and uncertainty. The impact
of this virus, and other epidemics and/or pandemics that may arise in the future, has negatively affected and may continue to affect the economies of many nations, individual companies and the global securities and commodities markets,
including their liquidity, in ways that cannot necessarily be foreseen at the present time. The impact of any outbreak may last for an extended period of time.
High public debt in the U.S. and other countries creates ongoing systemic and market risks and
policymaking uncertainty. There is no assurance that the U.S. Congress will act to raise the nation’s debt ceiling; a failure to do so could cause market turmoil and substantial investment risks that cannot now be fully predicted. Unexpected
political, regulatory and diplomatic events within the U.S. and abroad may affect investor and consumer confidence and may adversely impact financial markets and the broader economy.
China’s economy, which has been sustained in recent years largely through a debt-financed housing boom,
may be approaching the limits of that strategy and may experience a significant slowdown as a result of debt that cannot be repaid. Due to the size of China’s economy, such a slowdown could impact a number of other countries.
There is widespread concern about the potential effects of global climate change on property and security
values. Certain issuers, industries and regions may be adversely affected by the impact of climate change in ways that cannot be foreseen. The impact of legislation, regulation and international accords related to climate change may
negatively impact certain issuers and/or industries.
A rise in sea levels, a change in weather patterns, including an increase in powerful storms and large
wildfires, and/or a climate-driven increase in flooding could cause properties to lose value or become unmarketable altogether. Unlike previous declines in the real estate market, properties in affected zones may not ever recover their value.
The U.S. administration appears concerned about the climate change problem and is focusing regulatory and public works projects around those concerns. Regulatory changes and divestment movements tied to concerns about climate change could
adversely affect the value of certain land and the viability of industries whose activities or products are seen as accelerating climate change.
Losses related to climate change could adversely affect corporate issuers and mortgage lenders, the value
of mortgage-backed securities, the bonds of municipalities that depend on tax or other revenues and tourist dollars generated by affected properties, and insurers of the property and/or of corporate, municipal or mortgage-backed securities.
Since property and security values are driven largely by buyers’ perceptions, it is difficult to know the time period over which these market effects might unfold.
LIBOR Transition. Certain financial
contracts around the world specify rates that are based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), which is produced daily by averaging the rates for inter-bank lending reported by a number of banks. As previously announced by the
United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, most maturities and currencies of LIBOR were phased out at the end of 2021, with the remaining ones to be phased out on June 30, 2023. There are risks that the financial services industry
will not have a suitable substitute in place by that time and that there will not be time to perform the substantial work necessary to revise the many existing contracts that rely on LIBOR. The transition process, or a failure of the
industry to transition properly, might lead to increased volatility and illiquidity in markets that currently rely on LIBOR. It also could lead to a reduction in the value of some LIBOR-based investments and reduce the effectiveness of
new hedges placed against existing LIBOR-based instruments. New York and federal legislation has been enacted to ease the transition from LIBOR, but there is no assurance whether such legislation will adequately address all issues or be
subject to litigation.
Investments by the Fund in securities issued by companies that have more than 25% of revenue derived from thermal coal mining or are expanding
new thermal coal power generation are subject to formal review and approval by Neuberger Berman’s Environmental, Social and Governance Committee before the initiation of any new investment positions in the securities of those companies.
The investment program described above is speculative and entails substantial risks, and the Fund’s risk management methods may not accurately
predict future risk exposures. There can be no assurance that the investment objectives of the Fund will be achieved.
PORTFOLIO TRADING AND TURNOVER RATE
The Fund may engage in active and frequent trading. The Fund’s turnover rate is calculated by dividing (1) the lesser of the
cost of the securities purchased or the proceeds from the securities sold by the Fund during the fiscal year (other than securities, including options, whose maturity or expiration date at the time of acquisition was one year or less) by (2)
the month-end average of the value of such securities owned by the Fund during the fiscal year. The Fund generally does not engage in the trading of securities for the purpose of realizing short-term profits, but it will adjust its portfolio
as it deems advisable in view of prevailing or anticipated market conditions to accomplish its investment objectives. For example, the Fund may sell portfolio securities in anticipation of a movement in interest rates. Higher turnover rates
can result in corresponding increases in the Fund’s transaction costs, which must be borne by the Fund and its stockholders. High portfolio turnover may result in the Fund’s realization of net short-term capital gains that, when distributed
to stockholders, will be taxable as ordinary income. Frequency of portfolio turnover will not be a limiting factor if the Fund considers it advantageous to purchase or sell securities.
MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND
Directors and Officers
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of the business and affairs of the Fund, including general supervision of the duties
performed by NBIA. Subject to the provisions of the Fund’s Articles and Maryland law, the Board has all powers necessary and convenient to carry
out this responsibility, including the election and removal of the Fund’s officers. Among other things, the Board generally oversees the portfolio
management of the Fund and reviews and approves the Fund’s investment management agreement and other principal contracts.
The following tables set forth information concerning the Directors and officers of the Fund. All persons named as Directors
and officers also serve in similar capacities for other funds administered or managed by NBIA.
The Board of Directors
Name, (Year of Birth), and Address(1)
|
Position(s) and Length of Time Served(2)
|
Principal Occupation(s)(3)
|
Number of Portfolios
in Fund Complex Overseen
|
Other Directorships Held Outside Fund Complex(3)
|
Class I
|
Independent Fund Directors
|
Marc Gary (1952)
|
Director since 2015
|
Executive Vice Chancellor Emeritus, The Jewish Theological Seminary, since 2020; formerly, Executive Vice Chancellor and Chief Operating Officer, Jewish
Theological Seminary, 2012 to 2020; formerly, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Fidelity Investments, 2007 to 2012; formerly, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, BellSouth Corporation, 2004 to 2007; formerly,
Vice President and Associate General Counsel, BellSouth Corporation, 2000 to 2004; formerly, Associate, Partner, and National Litigation Practice Co-Chair, Mayer, Brown LLP, 1981 to 2000; formerly, Associate Independent Counsel,
Office of Independent Counsel, 1990 to 1992.
|
50
|
Chair and Director, USCJ Supporting Foundation, since 2021; Director, UJA Federation of Greater New York, since 2019; Trustee, The Jewish Theological
Seminary, since 2015; formerly, Director, Legility, Inc.(privately held for-profit company), 2012 to 2021; Director, Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (not-for-profit), since 2005; formerly, Director, Equal Justice Works
(not-for-profit), 2005 to 2014; formerly, Director, Corporate Counsel Institute, Georgetown University Law Center, 2007 to 2012; formerly, Director, Greater Boston Legal Services (not-for-profit), 2007 to2012.
|
Name, (Year of Birth), and Address(1) |
Position(s) and Length of Time Served(2) |
Principal Occupation(s)(3)
|
Number of Portfolios
in Fund Complex
Overseen
|
Other Directorships Held Outside Fund Complex(3)
|
Michael
M. Knetter (1960)
|
Director since 2007
|
President and Chief Executive Officer, University of Wisconsin Foundation, since 2010; formerly, Dean, School of Business, University of
Wisconsin - Madison; formerly, Professor of International Economics and Associate Dean, Amos Tuck School of Business - Dartmouth College, 1998 to 2002.
|
50 |
Director, 1 William Street Credit Income Fund, since 2018; Board Member, American Family Insurance (a mutual company, not publicly
traded), since March 2009; formerly, Trustee, Northwestern Mutual Series Fund, Inc., 2007 to 2011; formerly, Director, Wausau Paper, 2005 to 2011; formerly, Director, Great Wolf Resorts, 2004 to 2009.
|
Tom D. Seip (1950)
|
Director since 2003; Chairman of the Board since 2008; formerly Lead Independent Director from 2006 to 2008
|
Formerly, Managing Member, Ridgefield Farm LLC (a private investment vehicle), 2004 to 2016; formerly, President and CEO, Westaff, Inc. (temporary staffing),
May 2001 to January 2002; formerly, Senior Executive, The Charles Schwab Corporation, 1983 to 1998, including Chief Executive Officer, Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc.; Trustee, Schwab Family of Funds and Schwab Investments,
1997 to 1998; and Executive Vice President-Retail Brokerage, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., 1994 to 1997.
|
50
|
Trustee, University of Maryland, Shore Regional Health System, since 2020; formerly, Director, H&R Block, Inc. (tax services company), 2001 to 2018;
formerly, Director, Talbot Hospice Inc., 2013 to 2016; formerly, Chairman, Governance and Nominating Committee, H&R Block, Inc., 2011 to 2015; formerly, Chairman, Compensation Committee, H&R Block, Inc., 2006 to 2010;
formerly, Director, Forward Management, Inc. (asset management company), 1999 to 2006.
|
Class II
|
Independent Fund Directors
|
Michael J. Cosgrove (1949)
|
Director since 2015
|
President, Carragh Consulting USA, since 2014; formerly, Executive, General Electric Company, 1970 to 2014, including President, Mutual Funds and Global Investment Programs, GE
Asset Management, 2011 to 2014, President and Chief Executive Officer, Mutual Funds and Intermediary Business, GE Asset Management, 2007 to 2011, President, Institutional Sales and Marketing, GE Asset Management, 1998 to 2007, and
Chief Financial Officer, GE Asset Management, and Deputy Treasurer, GE Company, 1988 to 1993.
|
50
|
Director, America Press, Inc. (not-for-profit Jesuit publisher), 2015 to 2021; formerly, Director, Fordham University, 2001 to 2018; formerly, Director, The
Gabelli Go Anywhere Trust, June 2015 to June 2016; formerly, Director, Skin Cancer Foundation (not-for-profit), 2006 to 2015; formerly, Director, GE Investments Funds, Inc., 1997 to 2014; formerly, Trustee, GE Institutional Funds,
1997 to 2014; formerly, Director, GE Asset Management, 1988 to 2014; formerly, Director, Elfun Trusts, 1988 to 2014; formerly, Trustee, GE Pension & Benefit Plans, 1988 to 2014; formerly, Member of Board of Governors, Investment
Company Institute.
|
Name, (Year of Birth), and Address(1) |
Position(s) and Length of Time Served(2) |
Principal Occupation(s)(3) |
Number of Portfolios
in Fund Complex
Overseen
|
Other Directorships Held Outside Fund Complex(3) |
Deborah
C. McLean (1954)
|
Director since 2015
|
Member, Circle Financial Group (private wealth management membership practice), since 2011; Managing Director, Golden Seeds LLC (an angel investing group), since 2009; Adjunct
Professor (Corporate Finance), Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs, since 2008; formerly, Visiting Assistant Professor, Fairfield University, Dolan School of Business, Fall 2007; formerly, Adjunct Associate
Professor of Finance, Richmond, The American International University in London, 1999 to 2007.
|
50
|
Board member, The Maritime Aquarium at Norwalk, since 2020; Board member, Norwalk Community College Foundation, since 2014; Dean’s Advisory Council, Radcliffe Institute for
Advanced Study, since 2014; formerly, Director and Treasurer, At Home in Darien (not-for-profit), 2012 to 2014; formerly, Director, National Executive Service Corps (not-for-profit), 2012 to 2013; formerly, Trustee, Richmond, The
AmericanInternational University in London, 1999 to 2013.
|
George W. Morriss
(1947)
|
Director since 2007
|
Formerly, Adjunct Professor, Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs, from 2012 to 2018; formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, People’s United Bank, Connecticut (a financial services company),
1991 to 2001.
|
50
|
Director, 1 WS Credit Income Fund; Chair, Audit Committee, since 2018; Director and Chair, Thrivent Church Loan and Income Fund, since 2018; formerly,
Trustee, Steben Alternative Investment Funds, Steben Select Multi-Strategy Fund, and Steben Select Multi-Strategy Master Fund, 2013 to 2017; formerly, Treasurer, National Association of Corporate Directors, Connecticut Chapter, 2011
to 2015; formerly, Manager, Larch
Lane Multi-Strategy Fund complex (which consisted of three funds), 2006 to 2011; formerly, Member, NASDAQ Issuers’ Affairs Committee, 1995 to 2003.
|
Name, (Year of Birth), and Address(1) |
Position(s) and Length of Time Served(2) |
Principal Occupation(s)(3) |
Number of Portfolios
in Fund Complex
Overseen
|
Other Directorships Held Outside Fund Complex(3) |
Class III
|
Independent Fund Directors
|
Martha C. Goss (1949)
|
Director since 2007
|
Formerly, President, Woodhill Enterprises Inc./Chase Hollow Associates LLC (personal investment vehicle), 2006 to 2020; formerly, Consultant, Resources Global Professionals
(temporary staffing), 2002 to 2006; formerly, Chief Financial Officer, Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc., 1995 to 1999; formerly, Enterprise Risk Officer, Prudential Insurance, 1994 to 1995; formerly, President, Prudential Asset
Management Company, 1992 to 1994; formerly, President, Prudential Power Funding (investments in electric and gas utilities and alternative energy projects), 1989 to 1992; formerly, Treasurer, Prudential Insurance Company, 1983 to
1989.
|
50
|
Director, American Water (water utility), since 2003; Director, Allianz Life of New York (insurance), since 2005; formerly, Director, Berger Group Holdings, Inc. (engineering
consulting firm), 2013 to 2018; formerly, Director, Financial Women’s Association of New York (not-for-profit association), 1987 to 1996, 2003 to 2019; Trustee Emerita, Brown University, since 1998; Director, Museum of American
Finance (not-for-profit), since 2013; formerly, Non-Executive Chair and Director, Channel Reinsurance (financial guaranty reinsurance), 2006 to 2010; formerly, Director, Ocwen Financial Corporation (mortgage servicing), 2005 to 2010;
formerly, Director, Claire’s Stores, Inc. (retailer), 2005 to 2007; formerly, Director, Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc. (engineering consulting firm), 2007 to 2010; formerly, Director, Bank Leumi (commercial bank), 2005 to 2007; formerly,
Advisory Board Member, Attensity (software developer), 2005 to 2007; formerly, Director, Foster Wheeler Manufacturing, 1994 to 2004; formerly, Director, Dexter Corp., (manufacturer of Non-Wovens, Plastics, and Medical Supplies), 1992
to 2001.
|
James G. Stavridis (1955)
|
Director since 2015
|
Vice Chairman Global Affairs, The Carlyle Group, since 2018; Commentator, NBC News, since 2015; formerly, Dean, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, 2013 to
2018; formerly, Admiral, United States Navy, 1976 to 2013, including Supreme Allied Commander, NATO and Commander, European Command, 2009 to 2013, and Commander, United States Southern Command, 2006 to 2009.
|
50
|
Director, Fortinet (cybersecurity), since 2021; Director, Ankura, since 2020; Director, Vigor Shipyard, since 2019; Director, Rockefeller Foundation, since
2018; Director, American Water (water utility), since 2018; Director, NFP Corp. (insurance broker and consultant), since 2017; Director, Onassis Foundation, since 2014; Director, Michael Baker International (construction) since 2014;
Director, Vertical Knowledge, LLC, since 2013; formerly, Director, U.S. Naval Institute, 2014 to 2019; formerly, Director, Navy Federal Credit Union, 2000 to 2002; formerly, Director, BMC Software Federal, LLC, 2014 to 2019.
|
Name, (Year of Birth), and Address(1) |
Position(s) and Length of Time Served(2) |
Principal Occupation(s)(3) |
Number of Portfolios
in Fund Complex
Overseen
|
Other Directorships Held Outside Fund Complex(3) |
Fund Director who is an “Interested Person”
|
Joseph V. Amato*
(1962)
|
Chief Executive Officer and President since 2018; Director since 2009
|
President and Director, Neuberger Berman Group LLC, since 2009; President and Chief Executive Officer, Neuberger Berman BD LLC and Neuberger Berman Holdings
LLC (including its predecessor, Neuberger Berman Inc.), since 2007; Chief Investment Officer (Equities) and President (Equities), Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC (“NBIA”) (formerly, Neuberger Berman Fixed Income LLC (“NBFI”)
and including predecessor entities), since 2007, and Board Member of NBIA since 2006; formerly, Global Head of Asset Management of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s (“LBHI”) Investment Management Division, 2006 to 2009; formerly, member
of LBHI’s Investment Management Division’s Executive Management Committee, 2006 to 2009; formerly, Managing Director, Lehman Brothers Inc. (“LBI”), 2006 to 2008; formerly, Chief Recruiting and Development Officer, LBI, 2005 to 2006;
formerly, Global Head of LBI’s Equity Sales and a Member of its Equities Division Executive Committee, 2003 to 2005; President and Chief Executive Officer, twelve registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment
manager and/or administrator.
|
50
|
Member of Board of Advisors, McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, since 2001; Member of New York City Board of Advisors, Teach for America, since 2005; Trustee,
Montclair Kimberley Academy (private school), since 2007; Member of Board of Regents, Georgetown University, since 2013.
|
(1) The business address of each listed person is 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10104.
(2) The Board of Directors shall at all times be divided as equally as possible into three classes of Directors designated Class I, Class II and Class
III. Class I, Class II and Class III Directors shall serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held in 2024, 2025 and 2023, respectively, and then until each third Annual Meeting of Stockholders thereafter, or until their successors
have been duly elected and qualified.
(3) Except as otherwise indicated, each individual has held the positions, including directorships, shown for at least the last five years. “Other
Directorships” includes directorships held during the past five years by the applicable Director.
* Indicates a Director who is an “interested person” within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Mr. Amato is an interested person of the Fund by virtue of the
fact that he is an officer of NBIA and/or its affiliates.
Information about the Officers of the Fund (other than those listed above)
Name, Address and (Year of Birth)(1)
|
Position(s) and Length of Time Served(2)
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years
|
Claudia A. Brandon (1956)
|
Executive Vice President since 2008; Secretary since 2003
|
Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2007 and Employee since 1999; Senior Vice President, NBIA, since 2008 and Assistant Secretary since 2004;
formerly, Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2002 to 2006; formerly, Vice President – Mutual Fund Board Relations, NBIA, 2000 to 2008; formerly, Vice President, NBIA, 1986 to 1999 and Employee, 1984 to 1999; Executive Vice President
and Secretary, thirty-three registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
Agnes Diaz (1971)
|
Vice President since 2013
|
Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2012; Senior Vice President, NBIA, since 2012 and Employee since 1996; formerly, Vice President, Neuberger
Berman, 2007 to 2012; Vice President, twelve registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
Anthony DiBernardo (1979)
|
Assistant Treasurer since 2011
|
Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2014; Senior Vice President, NBIA, since 2014, and Employee since 2003; formerly, Vice President, Neuberger
Berman, 2009 to 2014; Assistant Treasurer, twelve registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
Name, Address and (Year of Birth)(1) |
Position(s) and Length of Time Served(2) |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Savonne L. Ferguson (1973)
|
Chief Compliance Officer since 2018
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer (Mutual Funds) and Associate General Counsel, NBIA, since November 2018; formerly, Vice President T. Rowe
Price Group, Inc. (2018), Vice President and Senior Legal Counsel, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (2014-2018), Vice President and Director of Regulatory Fund Administration, PNC Capital Advisors, LLC (2009-2014), Secretary, PNC Funds
and PNC Advantage Funds (2010-2014); Chief Compliance Officer, thirty-three registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
Corey A. Issing (1978)
|
Chief Legal Officer since 2016 (only for purposes of sections 307 and 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
|
General Counsel – Mutual Funds since 2016 and Managing Director, NBIA, since 2017; formerly, Associate General Counsel (2015 to 2016),
Counsel (2007 to 2015), Senior Vice President (2013 to 2016); Vice President (2009 to 2013); Chief Legal Officer (only for purposes of sections 307 and 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), thirty-three registered investment
companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
Sheila R. James (1965)
|
Assistant Secretary since 2003
|
Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2023 and Employee since 1999; Senior Vice President, NBIA, since 2023; formerly, Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2008 to 2023; Assistant Vice
President, Neuberger Berman, 2007; Employee, NBIA, 1991 to 1999; Assistant Secretary, thirty-three registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
Brian Kerrane (1969)
|
Chief Operating Officer since 2015; Vice President since 2008
|
Managing Director, Neuberger Berman, since 2013; Chief Operating Officer – Mutual Funds and Managing Director, NBIA, since 2015; formerly, Senior Vice
President, Neuberger Berman, 2006 to 2014; Vice President, NBIA, 2008 to 2015 and Employee since 1991; Chief Operating Officer, twelve registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator;
Vice President, thirty-three registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
Name, Address and (Year of Birth)(1) |
Position(s) and Length of Time Served(2) |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Anthony Maltese (1959)
|
Vice President since 2015
|
Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2014 and Employee since 2000; Senior Vice President, NBIA, since 2014; Vice President, twelve registered
investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
Josephine Marone (1963)
|
Assistant Secretary since 2017
|
Senior Paralegal, Neuberger Berman, since 2007 and Employee since 2007; Assistant Secretary, thirty-three registered investment companies for which NBIA acts
as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
Owen F. McEntee, Jr. (1961)
|
Vice President since 2008
|
Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2006; Vice President, NBIA, since 2006 and Employee since 1992; Vice President, twelve registered investment companies
for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
John M. McGovern (1970)
|
Treasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer since 2005
|
Managing Director, Neuberger Berman, since 2022; Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2007 to 2021; Senior Vice President, NBIA, since 2007 and Employee
since 1993; formerly, Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2004 to 2006; formerly, Assistant Treasurer, 2002 to 2005; Treasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, twelve registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as
investment manager and/or administrator.
|
Frank Rosato (1971)
|
Assistant Treasurer since 2005
|
Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2006; Vice President, NBIA, since 2006 and Employee since 1995; Assistant Treasurer, twelve registered investment
companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
(1) The business address of each listed person is 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10104.
(2) Pursuant to the Bylaws of the Fund each officer elected by the Directors shall hold office until his or her successor shall have been elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, inability to serve, or
resignation. Officers serve at the pleasure of the Directors and may be removed at any time with or without cause.
The Board of Directors
The Board is responsible for managing the business and affairs of the Fund. Among other things, the Board
generally oversees the portfolio management of the Fund and reviews and approves the Fund’s investment management agreement and other principal contracts. It is the Fund’s policy that at least three quarters of the Board shall be comprised of
Fund Directors who are not “interested persons” of NBIA (including its affiliates) or the Fund (“Independent Fund Directors”).
The Board has appointed an Independent Director to serve in the role of Chairman of the Board. The Chair’s primary
responsibilities are (i) to participate in the preparation of the agenda for meetings of the Board and in the identification of information to be presented to the Board; (ii) to preside at all meetings of the Board; (iii) to act as the
Board’s liaison with management between meetings of the Board; and (iv) to act as the primary contact for board communications. The Chair may perform such other functions as may be requested by the Board from time to time. Except for any
duties specified herein or pursuant to the Fund’s Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, the designation as Chair does not impose on such Independent Director any duties, obligations or liability that is greater than the duties, obligations or
liability imposed on such person as a member of the Board, generally.
As described below, the Board has an established committee structure through which the Board considers and addresses important matters involving
the Fund, including those identified as presenting conflicts or potential conflicts of interest for management. The Independent Fund Directors also regularly meet outside the presence of management and are advised by experienced independent
legal counsel knowledgeable in matters of investment company regulation. The Board periodically evaluates its structure and composition as well as various aspects of its operations. The Board believes that its leadership structure,
including its Independent Chair and its committee structure, is appropriate in light of, among other factors, the asset size of the fund complex overseen by the Board, the nature and number of funds overseen by the Board, the number of Fund
Directors, the range of experience represented on the Board and the Board’s responsibilities.
Additional Information About Directors
In nominating each candidate to serve, the Board is generally aware of each Director’s skills, experience,
judgment, analytical ability, intelligence, common sense, previous profit and not-for-profit board membership and, for each Independent Director, his or her demonstrated willingness to take an independent and questioning stance toward
management. For candidates to serve as Independent Directors, independence from the Manager, its affiliates and other principal service providers is critical. Each Director also has considerable familiarity with the funds in the Neuberger
Berman fund complex, the Manager, and their operations, as well as the special regulatory requirements governing regulated investment companies and the special responsibilities of investment company directors as a result of his or her
substantial prior service as a director of the funds in the Neuberger Berman fund complex. No particular qualification, experience or background establishes the basis for any Director’s position on the Board and the Governance and Nominating
Committee and individual Board members may have attributed different weights to the various factors.
In addition to the information set forth in the table above and other relevant qualifications, experience, attributes or skills applicable to a
particular Director, the following provides further information about the qualifications and experience of each Director.
Independent Directors
Michael J. Cosgrove: Mr. Cosgrove is President of an asset management consulting firm. He has experience as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer of the asset management division of a major multinational corporation. He also has experience as a President of institutional sales and marketing for the asset management division of the same corporation, where he was responsible
for all distribution, marketing, and development of mutual fund products. He also has served as a member of the boards of various not-for-profit organizations. He has served as a Fund Director for multiple years.
Marc Gary: Mr. Gary
has legal and investment management experience as executive vice president and general counsel of a major asset management firm. He also has experience as executive vice president and general counsel at a large corporation, and as national
litigation practice chair at a large law firm. He has served as a member of the boards of various profit and not-for-profit organizations. He currently is a trustee and the executive vice chancellor and COO of a religious seminary where he
oversees the seminary’s institutional budget. He has served as a Fund Director for multiple years.
Martha C. Goss: Ms. Goss has experience as chief operating and financial officer of an insurance holding company. She has experience as an investment professional, head of an investment unit and treasurer for a major insurance
company, experience as the Chief Financial Officer of two consulting firms, and experience as a lending officer and credit analyst at a major bank. She has experience managing a personal investment vehicle. She has served as a member of
the boards of various profit and not-for-profit organizations, including five NYSE listed companies, and a university. She has served as a Fund Director for multiple years.
Michael M. Knetter:
Dr. Knetter has organizational management experience as a dean of a major university business school and as President and CEO of a university supporting foundation. He also has responsibility for overseeing management of the university’s
endowment. He has academic experience as a professor of international economics. He has served as a member of the boards of various public companies and another mutual fund. He has served as a Fund Director for multiple years.
Deborah C. McLean: Ms.
McLean has experience in the financial services industry. She is currently involved with a high net worth private wealth management membership practice and an angel investing group, where she is active in investment screening and deal
leadership and execution. For many years she has been engaged in numerous roles with a variety of not-for-profit and private company boards and has taught corporate finance at the graduate and undergraduate levels. She commenced her
professional training at a major financial services corporation, where she was employed for multiple years. She has served as a Fund Director for multiple years.
George W. Morriss: Mr. Morriss has experience in senior management and as chief financial officer of a financial services company. He has investment management experience as a portfolio manager managing personal and institutional funds. He has
served as a member of a committee of representatives from companies listed on NASDAQ. He has served on the board of another mutual fund complex. He has served as a member of the board of funds of hedge funds. He has an advanced degree
in finance. He has served as a Fund Director for multiple years.
Tom D. Seip: Mr. Seip has experience in senior management and as chief executive officer
and director of a financial services company overseeing other mutual funds
and brokerage. He has experience as director of an asset management company. He has experience in management of a private investment partnership. He has served as a Fund Director for multiple years and as Independent Chair and/or Lead
Independent Director of the Board.
James G. Stavridis: Admiral
Stavridis has organizational management experience as a dean of a major university school of law and diplomacy. He also held many leadership roles with the United States Navy over the span of nearly four decades, including serving as
NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe and serving at the Pentagon at different periods of time as a strategic and long range planner on the staffs of the chief of Naval Operations, as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and as
Commander, U.S. Southern Command. He has also served as an advisor to private and public companies on geopolitical and cybersecurity matters. He has served as a Fund Director for multiple years.
Directors who are “Interested Persons”
Joseph V. Amato: Mr.
Amato has investment management experience as an executive with Neuberger Berman and another financial services firm. Effective July 1, 2018, Mr. Amato serves as Managing Director of Neuberger Berman and President—Mutual Funds of NBIA. He
also serves as Neuberger Berman’s Chief Investment Officer for equity investments. He has experience in leadership roles within Neuberger Berman and its affiliated entities. He has served as a member of the board of a major university
business school. He has served as a Fund Director since 2009.
Information About Committees
The Fund has established several standing committees to oversee particular aspects of the Fund’s management.
The standing committees of the Board are described below.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee’s
purposes are: (a) in accordance with exchange requirements and Rule 32a-4 under the 1940 Act, to oversee the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Fund and, as the Committee deems appropriate, to inquire into the internal
control over financial reporting of service providers; (b) in accordance with exchange requirements and Rule 32a-4 under the 1940 Act, to oversee the quality and integrity of the Fund’s financial statements and the independent audit
thereof; (c) in accordance with exchange requirements and Rule 32a-4 under the 1940 Act, to oversee, or, as appropriate, assist Board oversight of, the Fund’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements that relate to the Fund’s
accounting and financial reporting, internal control over financial reporting and independent audits; (d) to approve, prior to appointment by the Board, the engagement of the Fund’s independent auditors and, in connection therewith, to
review and evaluate the qualifications, independence and performance of the Fund’s independent auditors; (e) to act as a liaison between the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm and the full Board; (f) prepare an audit
committee report as required by Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K to be included in proxy statements relating to the election of directors; (g) to oversee the operation of policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that each
portfolio holding is valued in an appropriate and timely manner, reflecting information known to management (including management’s internal Valuation Committee) about the issuer, current market conditions, and other material factors
(“Pricing Policy”); (h) to consider and evaluate, and recommend to the Board when the Committee deems it appropriate, amendments to the Pricing Policy proposed by management, counsel, the auditors, the Committee itself or others; and (i) to
oversee fair value determinations
performed by the Adviser as the Fund’s valuation designee and, in connection therewith, to receive and review the
reports and notifications required to be provided by the valuation designee pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act and to request such information from the valuation designee as the Committee deems necessary to oversee the performance of
fair valuation determinations by the valuation designee. The independent auditors for the Fund shall report directly to the Audit Committee. Its members are Michael J. Cosgrove (Chair), Martha C. Goss
(Vice Chair), and Deborah C. McLean. All members are Independent Fund Directors. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, the Audit Committee met 7 times.
Closed-End Funds Committee. The Fund’s
Closed-End Funds Committee is responsible for consideration and evaluation of issues specific to the Fund. Its member is George W. Morriss (Chair), who is an Independent Fund Director. During the fiscal
year ended October 31, 2022, the Closed-End Funds Committee met 8 times.
Contract Review Committee. The Contract Review Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board regarding whether to approve or renew the Fund’s principal contractual arrangements, Rule 12b-1 plans, and such other agreements or
plans involving the Fund as the Board determines from time to time. The Contract Review Committee oversees and guides the process by which the Independent Fund Directors annually consider whether to approve or renew such contracts and
plans. Its members are Marc Gary, Deborah C. McLean (Chair), George W. Morriss (Vice Chair) and Michael J. Cosgrove. All members are Independent Fund Directors. During the fiscal year ended October 31,
2022, the Contract Review Committee met 5 times.
Ethics and Compliance Committee. The
Ethics and Compliance Committee generally: (a) coordinates the Board’s oversight of the Fund’s Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) in connection with the implementation of the Fund’s program for compliance with Rule 38a-1 under the 1940 Act
and the Fund’s implementation and enforcement of its compliance policies and procedures; (b) oversees the compliance with the Fund’s Code of Ethics, which restricts the personal securities transactions, including transactions in Fund
shares, of employees, officers, and directors; (c) considers and evaluates management’s framework for identifying, prioritizing, and managing compliance risks; (d) oversees arrangements for securities lending, if any, in a manner consistent
with applicable regulatory requirements, with special emphasis on any arrangements in which the Fund deals with the Adviser or any affiliate of the Adviser as principal or agent; (e) oversees the program by which the Adviser seeks to
monitor and improve the quality of execution for portfolio transactions; and (f) considers and evaluates management’s reports regarding: internal audit reviews involving compliance matters; payments made to third-party intermediaries; and
proxy voting policies, guidelines and procedures. The Committee shall not assume oversight duties to the extent that such duties have been assigned by the Board expressly to another Committee of the Board (such as oversight of internal
controls over financial reporting, which has been assigned to the Audit Committee) or to the Board as a whole. The Committee’s primary function is oversight. Each investment adviser, principal underwriter, administrator, custodian and
transfer agent, (collectively, “Service Providers”) is responsible for its own compliance with the federal securities laws and for devising, implementing, maintaining and updating appropriate policies, procedures and codes of ethics to
ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations and their contracts with the Fund. The CCO is responsible for administering the Fund’s compliance program, including devising and implementing appropriate methods of testing compliance
by the Fund and its Service Providers. Its members are Marc Gary (Chair), Michael M. Knetter, Tom D. Seip, and James G. Stavridis (Vice Chair). All members are Independent Fund Directors. The
entire Board will receive at least annually
a report on the compliance programs of the Fund and service providers and the required annual reports on the
administration of the Code of Ethics and the required annual certifications from the Fund and NBIA. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, the Ethics and Compliance Committee met 4 times.
Executive Committee. The Executive
Committee is responsible for acting in an emergency when a quorum of the Board of Directors is not available; the Committee will have all the powers of the Board of Directors when the Board is not in session to the extent permitted by
Maryland law. Its members are Joseph V. Amato (Vice Chair), Michael J. Cosgrove, Marc Gary, Martha C. Goss, Michael M. Knetter, Deborah C. McLean, George W. Morriss, and Tom D. Seip (Chair). All members
except for Mr. Amato are Independent Fund Directors. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, the Executive Committee did not meet.
Governance and Nominating Committee. The
Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for: (a) considering and evaluating the structure, composition and operation of the Board of Directors and each committee thereof, including the operation of the annual self-evaluation by
the Board; (b) evaluating and nominating individuals to serve as Fund Directors including as Independent Fund Directors, as members of committees, as Chair of the Board and as officers of the Fund; (c) recommending for Board approval any
proposed changes to Committee membership and recommending for Board and Committee approval any proposed changes to the Chair and Vice Chair appointments of any Committee following consultation with members of each such Committee; and (d)
considering and making recommendations relating to the compensation of Independent Fund Directors. The selection and nomination of candidates to serve as independent directors is committed to the discretion of the current Independent
Directors. Its members are Martha C. Goss (Chair), Michael M. Knetter, Tom D. Seip, and James G. Stavridis (Vice Chair). All members are Independent Fund Directors. The selection and nomination of
candidates to serve as independent directors is committed to the discretion of the current Independent Fund Directors. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, the Governance and Nominating Committee
met 4 times.
Investment Performance Committee. The
Investment Performance Committee is responsible for overseeing and guiding the process by which the Board reviews Fund performance and interfacing with management personnel responsible for investment risk management. Each Fund Director is a member of the Committee. Michael M. Knetter and Deborah C. McLean are the Chair and the Vice Chair, respectively, of the Committee. All members except for Mr. Amato are Independent Fund Directors.
During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, the Investment Performance Committee met 4 times.
Risk Management Oversight
As an integral part of its responsibility for oversight of the Fund in the interests of stockholders, the Board oversees risk management of the
Fund’s portfolio management, administration and operations. The Board views risk management as an important responsibility of management.
The Fund faces a number of risks, such as investment risk, counterparty risk, valuation risk, liquidity risk, reputational risk, risk of
operational failure or lack of business continuity, cybersecurity risk, and legal, compliance and regulatory risk.
Risk management seeks to identify and address risks, i.e., events or circumstances that could have material adverse effects on the business,
operations, stockholder services, investment performance or reputation of the Fund. Under the overall supervision of the Board, the Fund, the Manager, and the affiliates of the Manager, or other service providers to the Fund, employ a variety
of processes, procedures and controls to identify various of those possible events or circumstances, to lessen the probability of their occurrence and/or to mitigate the effects of such events or circumstances if they do occur. Different
processes, procedures and controls are employed with respect to different types of risks.
The Board exercises oversight of the Manager’s risk management processes primarily through the Board’s committee structure. The various committees,
as appropriate, and/or at times the Board, meet periodically with the Chief Risk Officer, head of operational risk, the Chief Information Security Officer, the CCO, the Treasurer, and the Chief Investment Officers for equity, alternative and
fixed income, the head of Internal Audit, and the Fund’s independent auditor. The committees, or the Board, as appropriate, review with these individuals, among other things, the design and implementation of risk management strategies in
their respective areas, and events and circumstances that have arisen and responses thereto.
The Board recognizes that not all risks that may affect the Fund can be identified, that it may not be practical or
cost-effective to eliminate or mitigate certain risks, that it may be necessary to bear certain risks (such as investment-related risks) to achieve the Fund’s goals, and that the processes, procedures and controls employed to address certain
risks may be limited in their effectiveness. Moreover, reports received by the Directors as to risk management matters are typically summaries of the relevant information. Furthermore, it is in the very nature of certain risks that they can
be evaluated only as probabilities, and not as certainties. As a result of the foregoing and other factors, the Board’s risk management oversight is subject to substantial limitations, and no risk management program can predict the likelihood
or seriousness of, or mitigate the effects of, all potential risks.
Compensation and Indemnification
The Fund’s Articles provide that the Fund will indemnify its Fund Directors and officers against liabilities and expenses reasonably incurred in
connection with litigation in which they may be involved because of their offices with the Fund, unless it is adjudicated that they (a) engaged in bad faith, willful misfeasance, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of the duties involved
in the conduct of their offices, or (b) did not act in good faith in the reasonable belief that their action was in the best interest of the Fund. In the case of settlement, such indemnification will not be provided unless it has been
determined (by a court or other body approving the settlement or other disposition, by a majority of disinterested directors based upon a review of readily available facts, or in a written opinion of independent counsel) that such officers or
Fund Directors have not engaged in willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of their duties.
Officers and Directors who are interested persons of the Fund, as defined in the 1940 Act, will receive no salary or fees from the Fund.
Effective January 1, 2022, for serving as a trustee/director of the funds in the Neuberger Berman fund family, each Independent Fund Director
receives a combined annual retainer of $180,000, paid quarterly, and a fee of $15,000 for each of the regularly scheduled meetings he or
she attends in-person or by telephone. For any additional special in-person or telephonic meeting of the Board, the Governance and Nominating Committee will determine
whether a fee is warranted. To compensate for the additional time commitment, the Chair of the Audit Committee receives $20,000 per year, the Chair of the Contract Review Committee and the Chair of the Closed-End Funds Committee each receives
$25,000 per year, and each Chair of the other Committees receives $15,000 per year, with the exception of the Chair of the Executive Committee who receives no additional compensation for this role. No additional compensation is provided for
service on a Board committee. The Chair of the Board who is also an Independent Fund Director receives an additional $70,000 per year.
The Neuberger Berman Funds reimburse Independent Fund Directors for their travel and other out-of-pocket expenses related to attendance at Board
meetings. The Independent Fund Director compensation is allocated to each fund in the Neuberger Berman fund family based on a method the Board finds reasonable.
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of the Fund Directors. The Fund does not have any retirement plan for the
Fund Directors.
TABLE OF COMPENSATION
Name and Position with the Fund
|
Aggregate Compensation from the Fund for the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2022
|
Total Compensation from Registered Investment Companies in the Neuberger Berman Fund Complex Paid to Directors for Calendar Year Ended
December 31, 2022
|
Independent Fund Directors
|
|
|
Michael J. Cosgrove
Director
|
$5,260
|
$260,000
|
Marc Gary
Director
|
$5,156
|
$255,000
|
Martha C. Goss
Director
|
$5,156
|
$255,000
|
Michael M. Knetter
Director
|
$5,156
|
$255,000
|
Deborah C. McLean
Director
|
$5,336
|
$265,000
|
George W. Morriss
Director
|
$5,260
|
$260,000
|
Tom D. Seip
Chairman of the Board and Director
|
$6,185
|
$310,000
|
James G. Stavridis
Director
|
$4,847
|
$240,000
|
Peter P. Trapp1
Director
|
$1,170
|
$0
|
Director who is an “Interested Person”
|
|
|
Joseph V. Amato
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
$0
|
$0
|
1 Mr. Trapp retired from the Board effective December 31, 2021.
Ownership of Securities
The following table sets forth the aggregate dollar range of securities owned by each Fund Director in all the funds in the fund family overseen by
the Fund Director, valued as of December 31, 2022.
Name of Fund Director
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities Held in the Registrant
|
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities Held in all Registered Investment Companies Overseen by Fund Director in Family of Investment Companies
|
Independent Fund Directors
|
|
|
Michael J. Cosgrove
|
A
|
E
|
Marc Gary
|
A
|
E
|
Martha C. Goss
|
A
|
E
|
Michael M. Knetter
|
A
|
E
|
Deborah C. McLean
|
A
|
E
|
George W. Morriss
|
A
|
E
|
Tom D. Seip
|
A
|
E
|
James G. Stavridis
|
A
|
E
|
Fund Director who is an “Interested Person”
|
|
E
|
Joseph V. Amato
|
A
|
E
|
A = None; B = $1-$10,000; C = $10,001-$50,000; D = $50,001-$100,000; E = over $100,000
Independent Fund Directors’ Ownership of Securities
As of December 31, 2022, no Independent Fund Director (or his/her immediate family members) owned securities of NBIA or
securities in an entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with NBIA (not including shares of registered investment companies).
Codes of Ethics
The Fund and NBIA have personal securities trading policies that restrict the personal securities transactions of employees,
officers, and Directors. Their primary purpose is to ensure that personal trading by these individuals does not disadvantage any fund managed by NBIA. The portfolio managers and other investment personnel who comply with the policies’
pre-clearance and disclosure procedures may be permitted to purchase, sell or hold certain types of securities which also may be or are held in the funds they advise, but are restricted from trading in close conjunction with the Fund or
taking personal advantage of investment opportunities that may belong to the Fund. Text-only versions of the Codes of Ethics can be viewed online or downloaded from the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s internet web site at www.sec.gov.
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES
Investment Manager and Administrator
NBIA serves as the investment manager to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement with the Fund, dated as of May 13, 2009
(“Management Agreement”). NBIA also provides investment management and advisory services to private accounts of institutional and individual clients and to mutual funds and other registered investment companies. As of December 31, 2022,
NBIA and its affiliates had approximately $427 billion in assets under management. NBIA is located at 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10104-0002.
The Management Agreement provides, in substance, that NBIA will make and implement investment decisions for the Fund in its discretion and will
continuously develop an investment program for the Fund’s assets. The Management Agreement permits NBIA to effect securities transactions on behalf of the Fund through associated persons of NBIA. The Management Agreement also specifically
permits NBIA to compensate, through higher commissions, brokers and dealers who provide investment research and analysis to the Fund, although NBIA has no current plans to pay a material amount of such compensation.
The Management Agreement provides that NBIA shall not be subject to any liability in connection with the performance of its services thereunder in
the absence of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of its obligations and duties. In the event that litigation against NBIA, in connection with its obligations under the Management Agreement or
administration agreement (described below), ends with a determination that NBIA acted without culpability, the Fund will reimburse NBIA for reasonable attorney’s fees and other expenses. In the event a matter ends without a court ruling on
NBIA’s culpability, any unresolved issue will be determined by a committee of disinterested Directors who were not party to the suit or by an opinion of independent legal counsel. The Fund may advance expenses to NBIA if (1) a committee of
non-party disinterested Directors or independent legal counsel determines that NBIA is likely to prevail, and (2) the Fund is adequately assured of repayment in the event of an adverse result.
NBIA provides to the Fund, without separate cost, office space, equipment, and facilities and the personnel necessary to
perform executive, administrative, and clerical functions. NBIA will pay all salaries, expenses, and fees of the officers, Directors, and employees of the Fund who are officers, Directors, or employees of NBIA. Director(s) and/or officer(s)
of NBIA currently serve as Directors and officers of the Fund. See “Management of the Fund-Directors and Officers.”
Pursuant to the Management Agreement, the Fund agrees to pay NBIA an annual management fee, payable on a monthly basis, at the annual rate of 0.60%
of the Fund’s average daily total assets minus liabilities other than the aggregate indebtedness entered into for purposes of leverage (“Managed Assets”).
NBIA provides facilities, services, and personnel as well as accounting, record keeping and other services to the Fund pursuant to an
administration agreement with the Fund, dated as of May 4, 2009 (“Administration Agreement”). Under the Administration Agreement, NBIA also provides certain stockholder, stockholder-related, and other services that are not furnished by the
Fund’s stockholder servicing agent. NBIA provides the direct stockholder services specified in the
Administration Agreement and assist the stockholder servicing agent in the development and implementation of specified programs and systems to enhance overall
stockholder servicing capabilities. NBIA solicits and gathers stockholder proxies, performs services connected with the Fund’s exchange listing, and furnishes other services the parties agree from time to time should be provided under the
Administration Agreement.
For administrative services, the Fund pays NBIA at the annual rate of 0.25% of average daily Managed Assets. With the Fund’s consent, NBIA may
subcontract to third parties some of its responsibilities to the Fund under the Administration Agreement. In addition, the Fund may compensate such third parties for accounting and other services. Currently, NBIA retains State Street as its
sub-administrator under a Sub-Administration Agreement. NBIA pays State Street a fee for all services received under the Sub-Administration Agreement.
All fees and expenses are accrued daily and are deducted before payment of distributions to stockholders. The Management
Agreement continues until October 31, 2023. The Management Agreement is renewable thereafter from year to year with respect to the Fund, so long as its continuance is approved at least annually (1) by the vote of a majority of the
Independent Fund Directors, cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval, and (2) by the vote of a majority of the Directors or by a 1940 Act majority vote of the outstanding stock of the Fund. The
Administration Agreement continues until October 31, 2023. The Administration Agreement is renewable from year to year, so long as its continuance is approved at least annually (1) by the vote of a majority of the Independent Fund Directors,
and (2) by the vote of a majority of the Directors or by a 1940 Act majority vote of the outstanding stock in the Fund.
The Management Agreement is terminable, without penalty, on 60 days’ written notice either by the Fund or by NBIA. The Administration Agreement is
terminable, without penalty, on 60 days’ written notice either by NBIA or by the Fund. Each Agreement will terminate automatically if it is assigned.
Except as otherwise described in the Prospectus, the Fund will pay, in addition to the investment management fee described above, all expenses not
assumed by NBIA, including, without limitation, fees and expenses of Directors who are not “interested persons” of NBIA or the Fund, interest charges, taxes, brokerage commissions, expenses of issue of shares, fees and expenses of registering
and qualifying Fund shares for distribution under federal and state laws and regulations, charges of custodians, auditing and legal expenses, expenses of determining NAV of the Fund, reports to stockholders, expenses of meetings of
stockholders, expenses of printing and mailing prospectuses, proxy statements and proxies to existing stockholders, and its proportionate share of insurance premiums and professional association dues or assessments. The Fund will also be
responsible for such nonrecurring expenses as may arise, including litigation in which the Fund may be a party, and other expenses as determined by the Board. The Fund may have an obligation to indemnify its officers and Directors with
respect to such litigation.
The total dollar amounts paid by the Fund to the Adviser for the last three fiscal years ended October 31, 2022, October 31, 2021 and October 31, 2020 are $2,450,060, $2,395,640 and $2,333,389, respectively.
Management and Control of NBIA
NBIA is an indirect subsidiary of Neuberger Berman Group LLC (“NBG,” and together with
its consolidated subsidiaries “NB Group”). The directors, officers and/or employees of NBIA who are deemed “control persons,” all of whom have offices at the same
address as NBIA are: Joseph Amato and Brad Tank. Mr. Amato is both a Director and an officer of the Fund.
NBG’s voting equity is owned by NBSH Acquisition, LLC (“NBSH”). NBSH is owned by portfolio managers, members of the NBG’s
management team, and certain of NBG’s key employees and senior professionals.
Portfolio Manager Information
Steve S. Shigekawa (Managing Director of NBIA) and Brian Jones, CFA (Managing Director of NBIA) serve as portfolio managers of
the Fund. The table below describes the accounts for which they have day-to-day management responsibility as of October 31, 2022.
Type of Account
|
Number of Accounts Managed
|
Total Assets
Managed
($ millions)
|
Number of
Accounts
Managed for
which Advisory
Fee is
Performance-
Based
|
Assets Managed for
which Advisory Fee
is Performance-
Based
($ millions)
|
Steve S. Shigekawa
|
|
|
|
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
2
|
$974
|
0
|
$0
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles**
|
13
|
$1,117
|
0
|
$0
|
Other Accounts***
|
25
|
$100
|
0
|
$0
|
Brian Jones
|
|
|
|
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
2
|
$974
|
0
|
$0
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles**
|
13
|
$1,117
|
0
|
$0
|
Other Accounts***
|
25
|
$100
|
0
|
$0
|
*
|
Registered Investment Companies include: Mutual Funds.
|
**
|
A portion of certain accounts may be managed by other portfolio managers; however, the total assets of such accounts are included above even though the
portfolio manager listed above is not involved in the day-to-day management of the entire account.
|
***
|
Other Accounts include: Institutional Separate Accounts, Sub-Advised Accounts and Managed Accounts (WRAP Accounts).
|
Conflicts of Interest
Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than
one Fund or other account. The management of multiple funds and accounts (including proprietary accounts) may give rise to actual or potential conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different or similar objectives, benchmarks,
time horizons, and fees, as the portfolio manager must allocate his or her time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts. The portfolio manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely impact the
value of securities or instruments held by the Fund, and which may include transactions that are directly contrary to the positions taken by the Fund. For example, a portfolio manager may engage in short sales of securities or instruments for
another account that are the same type of securities or instruments in which a fund it manages also invests. In such a case, the portfolio manager could be seen as harming the performance of the Fund for the benefit of the account engaging in
short sales if the short sales cause the market value of the securities or instruments to fall. Additionally, if a portfolio manager identifies a limited investment opportunity that may be suitable for more than one fund or other account, the
Fund may not be able to take full advantage of that opportunity. There may also be regulatory limitations that prevent the Fund from participating in a transaction that another account or fund managed by the same portfolio manager will
invest. For example, the 1940 Act prohibits the Fund from participating in certain transactions with certain of its affiliates and from participating in “joint” transactions alongside certain of its affiliates. The prohibition on “joint”
transactions may limit the ability of the Fund to participate alongside its affiliates in privately negotiated transactions unless the transaction is otherwise permitted under existing regulatory guidance and may reduce the amount of
privately negotiated transactions that the Fund may participate. Further, the Manager may take an investment position or action for a fund or account that may be different from, inconsistent with, or have different rights than (e.g., voting
rights, dividend or repayment priorities or other features that may conflict with one another), an action or position taken for one or more other funds or accounts, including the Fund, having similar or different objectives. A conflict may
also be created by investing in different parts of an issuer’s capital structure (e.g., equity or debt, or different positions in the debt structure). Those positions and actions may adversely impact, or in some instances benefit, one or more
affected accounts, including the funds. Potential conflicts may also arise because portfolio decisions and related actions regarding a position held for a fund or another account may not be in the best interests of a position held by another
fund or account having similar or different objectives. If one account were to buy or sell portfolio securities or instruments shortly before another account bought or sold the same securities or instruments, it could affect the price paid or
received by the second account. Securities selected for funds or accounts other than the Fund may outperform the securities selected for the Fund. Finally, a conflict of interest may arise if the Manager and a portfolio manager have a
financial incentive to favor one account over another, such as a performance-based management fee that applies to one account but not all funds or accounts for which the portfolio manager is responsible. In the ordinary course of operations,
certain businesses within the Neuberger Berman organization (the “Firm”) will seek access to material nonpublic information. For instance, NBIA portfolio managers may obtain and utilize material non-public information in purchasing loans and
other debt instruments and certain privately placed or restricted equity instruments. From time to time, NBIA portfolio managers will be offered the opportunity on behalf of applicable clients to participate on a creditors or other similar
committee in connection with restructuring or other “work-
out” activity, which participation could provide access to material nonpublic information. The Firm maintains procedures that address the process by which material
non-public information may be acquired intentionally by the Firm. When considering whether to acquire material nonpublic information, the Firm will attempt to balance the interests of all clients, taking into consideration relevant factors,
including the extent of the prohibition on trading that would occur, the size of the Firm’s existing position in the issuer, if any, and the value of the information as it relates to the investment decision-making process. The acquisition of
material non-public information would likely give rise to a conflict of interest since the Firm may be prohibited from rendering investment advice to clients regarding the securities or instruments of such issuer and thereby potentially
limiting the universe of securities or instruments that the Firm, including the Fund, may purchase or potentially limiting the ability of the Firm, including the Fund, to sell such securities or instruments. Similarly, where the Firm declines
access to (or otherwise does not receive or share within the Firm) material non-public information regarding an issuer, the portfolio managers could potentially base investment decisions with respect to assets of such issuer solely on public
information, thereby limiting the amount of information available to the portfolio managers in connection with such investment decisions. In determining whether or not to elect to receive material non-public information, the Firm will
endeavor to act fairly to its clients as a whole. The Firm reserves the right to decline access to material nonpublic information, including declining to join a creditors or similar committee. NBIA and the Fund have adopted certain compliance
procedures which are designed to address these types of conflicts. However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.
Compensation of Portfolio Managers
Our compensation philosophy is one that focuses on rewarding performance and incentivizing our employees. We are also focused
on creating a compensation process that we believe is fair, transparent, and competitive with the market.
Compensation for portfolio managers consists of fixed (salary) and variable (bonus) compensation but is more heavily weighted on the variable
portion of total compensation and is paid from a team compensation pool made available to the portfolio management team with which the portfolio manager is associated. The size of the team compensation pool is determined based on a formula
that takes into consideration a number of factors including the pre-tax revenue that is generated by that particular portfolio management team, less certain adjustments. The bonus portion of the compensation is discretionary and is determined
on the basis of a variety of criteria, including investment performance (including the aggregate multi-year track record), utilization of central resources (including research, sales and operations/support), business building to further the
longer term sustainable success of the investment team, effective team/people management, and overall contribution to the success of Neuberger Berman. Certain portfolio managers may manage products other than mutual funds, such as high net
worth separate accounts. For the management of these accounts, a portfolio manager may generally receive a percentage of pre-tax revenue determined on a monthly basis less certain deductions. The percentage of revenue a portfolio manager
receives pursuant to this arrangement will vary based on certain revenue thresholds.
The terms of our long-term retention incentives are as follows:
Employee-Owned Equity. Certain employees
(primarily senior leadership and investment professionals) participated in Neuberger Berman’s equity ownership structure, which was designed
to incentivize and retain key personnel. In addition, in prior years certain employees may have elected to have a
portion of their compensation delivered in the form of equity. We also offer an equity acquisition program which allows employees a more direct opportunity to invest in Neuberger Berman.
For confidentiality and privacy reasons, we cannot disclose individual equity holdings or program participation.
Contingent Compensation Plan. Certain employees may participate in the Neuberger Berman Group Contingent Compensation Plan (the “CCP”) to serve as a means to further align the interests of our employees with the success of the firm and the
interests of our clients, and to reward continued employment. Under the CCP, up to 20% of a participant’s annual total compensation in excess of $500,000 is contingent and subject to vesting. The contingent amounts are maintained in a
notional account that is tied to the performance of a portfolio of Neuberger Berman investment strategies as specified by the firm on an employee-by-employee basis. By having a participant’s contingent compensation tied to Neuberger Berman
investment strategies, each employee is given further incentive to operate as a prudent risk manager and to collaborate with colleagues to maximize performance across all business areas. In the case of members of investment teams, including
portfolio managers, the CCP is currently structured so that such employees have exposure to the investment strategies of their respective teams as well as the broader Neuberger Berman portfolio.
Restrictive Covenants. Most investment professionals, including portfolio managers, are subject to notice periods and restrictive covenants which include employee and client non-solicit restrictions as well as restrictions on the use of confidential
information. In addition, depending on participation levels, certain senior professionals who have received equity grants have also agreed to additional notice and transition periods and, in some cases, non-compete restrictions. For
confidentiality and privacy reasons, we cannot disclose individual restrictive covenant arrangements
Ownership of Securities
Set forth below is the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by the Fund’s Portfolio Managers in the Registrant
as of October 31, 2022.
Portfolio Manager
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities Owned in the
Registrant
|
|
Steve S. Shigekawa
|
A
|
|
Brian Jones
|
A
|
|
|
A = None
|
E = $100,001-$500,000
|
|
B = $1-$10,000
|
F = $500,001-$1,000,000
|
|
C = $10,001 - $50,000
|
G = Over $1,000,000
|
|
D =$50,001-$100,000
|
|
PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS
Other Investment Companies or Accounts Managed
The investment decisions concerning the Fund and the other registered investment companies
managed by NBIA (collectively, “Other NB Funds”) have been and will continue to be made independently of one another. In terms of their investment objectives, most of
the Other NB Funds differ from the Fund. Even where the investment objectives are similar, however, the methods used by the Other NB Funds and the Fund to achieve their objectives may differ. The investment results achieved by all of the
registered investment companies managed by NBIA have varied from one another in the past and are likely to vary in the future. In addition, NBIA or its affiliates may manage one or more Other NB Funds or other accounts with similar investment
objectives and strategies as the Fund that may have risks that are greater or less than the Fund.
There may be occasions when the Fund and one or more of the Other NB Funds or other accounts or funds managed by NBIA are
contemporaneously engaged in purchasing or selling the same securities from or to third parties. When this occurs, the transactions may be aggregated to obtain favorable execution to the extent permitted by applicable law and regulations. The
transactions will be allocated according to one or more methods designed to ensure that the allocation is equitable to the Fund and accounts involved. Although in some cases this arrangement may have a detrimental effect on the price or
volume of the securities as to the Fund, in other cases it is believed that the Fund’s ability to participate in volume transactions may produce better executions for it. In any case, it is the judgment of the Directors and NBIA that the
desirability of the Fund having its advisory arrangements with NBIA outweighs any disadvantages that may result from contemporaneous transactions.
The Fund is subject to certain limitations imposed on all advisory clients of NBIA (including the Fund, the Other NB Funds, and other managed funds
or accounts) and personnel of NBIA and its affiliates. These may include, for example, limits that may be imposed in certain industries or by certain companies, and policies of NBIA that limit the aggregate purchases, by all accounts under
management, of the outstanding shares of public companies.
Proxy Voting
The Board has delegated to NBIA the responsibility to vote proxies related to the securities held in the Fund’s portfolio.
Under this authority, NBIA would be required by the Board to vote proxies related to portfolio securities in the best interests of the Fund and its stockholders. The Board permits NBIA to contract with a third party to obtain proxy voting and
related services, including research of current issues.
NBIA has implemented written Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures (“Proxy Voting Policy”) that are designed to reasonably ensure that NBIA votes
proxies prudently and in the best interest of its advisory clients for whom NBIA has voting authority, including the Fund. The Proxy Voting Policy also describes how NBIA addresses any conflicts that may arise between its interests and those
of its clients with respect to proxy voting.
NBIA’s Governance and Proxy Committee (“Proxy Committee”) is responsible for developing, authorizing, implementing and updating the Proxy Voting
Policy, administering and overseeing the proxy voting process and engaging and overseeing any independent third-party vendors as voting delegates to review, monitor and/or vote proxies. In order to apply the Proxy Voting Policy noted above in
a timely and consistent manner, NBIA utilizes Glass, Lewis & Co. (“Glass Lewis”) to vote proxies in accordance with NBIA’s voting guidelines or, in instances where a material conflict has been determined to exist, in accordance with the
voting recommendations of an
independent third party. NBIA retains final authority and fiduciary responsibility for proxy voting. NBIA believes that this process is reasonably designed to
address material conflicts of interest that may arise between NBIA and a client as to how proxies are voted.
In the event that an investment professional at NBIA believes that it is in the best interests of a client or clients to vote proxies in a manner
inconsistent with the voting guidelines, the Proxy Committee will review information submitted by the investment professional to determine that there is no material conflict of interest between NBIA and the client with respect to the voting
of the proxy in the requested manner.
If the Proxy Committee determines that the voting of a proxy as recommended by the investment professional would not be appropriate, the Proxy
Committee shall: (i) take no further action, in which case Glass Lewis shall vote such proxy in accordance with the voting guidelines; (ii) disclose such conflict to the client or clients and obtain written direction from the client as to how
to vote the proxy; (iii) suggest that the client or clients engage another party to determine how to vote the proxy; or (iv) engage another independent third party to determine how to vote the proxy.
The Fund may invest in shares of affiliated funds and may own substantial portions of these underlying affiliated funds. When the Fund holds shares
of underlying affiliated funds, the Fund will vote proxies of those funds in the same proportion as the vote of all other holders of the fund’s shares, unless the Board otherwise instructs. Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies
relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available, without charge, by calling 1-800-877-9700 (toll-free) or by visiting www.nb.com or the website of the SEC, www.sec.gov.
Brokerage and Research Services
Orders for the purchase or sale of portfolio securities are placed on behalf of the Fund by NBIA pursuant to the terms of the
advisory agreement. In effecting securities transactions, the Fund seeks to obtain the best price and execution of orders. While affiliates of NBIA are permitted to act as brokers for the Fund in the purchase and sale of its portfolio
securities (other than certain securities traded on the OTC market) where such brokers are capable of providing best execution (“Affiliated Brokers”), the Fund generally uses unaffiliated brokers.
For Fund transactions which involve securities traded on the OTC market, the Fund purchases and sells OTC securities in
principal transactions with dealers who are the principal market makers for such securities.
During the fiscal years ended October 31, 2022, October 31, 2021 and October 31, 2020, the Fund paid brokerage commissions of $42,024, $32,893 and $41,625, respectively, of which $0, $0 and $0
respectively, was paid to Neuberger Berman.
During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022, the Fund did not acquire or hold any securities of its “regular brokers or dealers” (as defined under the 1940 Act).
The amount of brokerage commissions paid by the Fund may vary significantly from year to year due to a variety of factors,
including the types of investments selected by the Manager, investment strategy changes, changing asset levels, and/or portfolio turnover.
Commission rates, being a component of price, are considered along with other relevant
factors in evaluating best price and execution. In selecting a broker other than an Affiliated Broker to execute Fund transactions, NBIA generally
considers the quality and reliability of brokerage services, including execution capability, speed of execution, overall performance, and financial responsibility, and may consider, among other factors, research and other investment
information or services (“research services”) provided by those brokers as well as any expense offset arrangements offered by the brokers.
The Fund may use an Affiliated Broker where, in the judgment of NBIA, that firm is able to obtain a price and execution at
least as favorable as other qualified brokers. To the Fund’s knowledge, no affiliate of the Fund receives give-ups or reciprocal business in connection with its securities transactions.
The use of an Affiliated Broker for the Fund is subject to the requirements of Section 11(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “1934 Act”). Section 11(a) prohibits members of national securities exchanges from retaining compensation for executing exchange transactions for accounts which they or their affiliates manage, except where they have the authorization of
the persons authorized to transact business for the account and comply with certain annual reporting requirements. Before an Affiliated Broker is used, the Fund and NBIA expressly authorize the Affiliated Broker to retain such compensation,
and the Affiliate Broker would have to agree to comply with the reporting requirements of Section 11(a).
Under the 1940 Act, commissions paid by the Fund to an Affiliated Broker in connection with a purchase or sale of securities on a securities
exchange may not exceed the usual and customary broker’s commission. Accordingly, it is the Fund’s policy that the commissions paid an Affiliated Broker will be at least as favorable to the Fund as those that would be charged by other
qualified brokers having comparable execution capability in NBIA’s judgment. The Fund does not deem it practicable and in its best interests to solicit competitive bids for commissions on each transaction effected by an Affiliated Broker.
However, when an Affiliated Broker is executing portfolio transactions on behalf of the Fund, consideration regularly will be given to information concerning the prevailing level of commissions charged by other brokers on comparable
transactions during comparable periods of time. The 1940 Act generally prohibits an Affiliated Broker from acting as principal in the purchase of portfolio securities from, or the sale of portfolio securities to, the Fund unless an
appropriate exemption is available.
A committee of Independent Fund Directors from time to time reviews, among other things, information relating to the
commissions charged by an Affiliated Broker to the Fund and to their other customers and information concerning the prevailing level of commissions charged by other brokers having comparable execution capability.
To ensure that accounts of all investment clients, including the Fund, are treated fairly in the event that an Affiliated Broker receives
transaction instructions regarding the same security for more than one investment account at or about the same time, the Affiliated Broker may combine orders placed on behalf of clients, including advisory accounts in which affiliated persons
have an investment interest, for the purpose of negotiating brokerage commissions or obtaining a more favorable price. Where appropriate, securities purchased or sold may be allocated, in terms of amount, to a client according to the
proportion that the size of the order placed by that account bears to the aggregate size of orders contemporaneously placed by the other accounts, subject to de minimis exceptions. All participating accounts pay or receive the same price when
orders are combined.
Under policies adopted by the Board, an Affiliated Broker may enter into agency cross-trades on behalf of the Fund. An agency
cross-trade is a securities transaction in which the same broker acts as agent on both sides of the trade and the broker or an affiliate has discretion over one of the participating accounts. In this situation, the Affiliated Broker would
receive brokerage commissions from both participants in the trade. The other account participating in an agency cross-trade with the Fund cannot be an account over which the Affiliated Broker exercises investment discretion. A member of the
Board of Directors who will not be affiliated with the Affiliated Broker will review information about each agency cross-trade that the Fund participates in.
In selecting a broker to execute Fund transactions, the Manager considers the quality and reliability of brokerage services, including execution
capability, speed of execution, overall performance, and financial responsibility, and may consider, among other factors, research and other investment information provided by non-affiliated brokers.
A committee comprised of officers of NBIA who are portfolio managers of the Fund and Other NB Funds (collectively, “NB Funds”) and some of NBIA’s
managed accounts (“Managed Accounts”) periodically evaluates throughout the year the nature and quality of the brokerage and research services provided by other brokers. Based on this evaluation, the committee establishes a list and projected
rankings of preferred brokers for use in determining the relative amounts of commissions to be allocated to those brokers. Ordinarily, the brokers on the list effect a large portion of the brokerage transactions for the NB Funds and the
Managed Accounts. However, in any semi-annual period, brokers not on the list may be used, and the relative amounts of brokerage commissions paid to the brokers on the list may vary substantially from the projected rankings. These variations
reflect the following factors, among others: (1) brokers not on the list or ranking below other brokers on the list may be selected for particular transactions because they provide better price and/or execution, which is the primary
consideration in allocating brokerage; (2) adjustments may be required because of periodic changes in the execution capabilities of or research or other services provided by particular brokers or in the execution or research needs of the NB
Funds and/or the Managed Accounts; and (3) the aggregate amount of brokerage commissions generated by transactions for the NB Funds and the Managed Accounts may change substantially from one semi-annual period to the next.
The commissions paid to a broker other than an Affiliated Broker may be higher than the amount another firm might charge if the
Manager determines in good faith that the amount of those commissions is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided by the broker. The Manager believes that those research services benefit the Fund by
supplementing the information otherwise available to the Manager. That research may be used by the Manager in servicing Other NB Funds and in servicing Managed Accounts. On the other hand, research received by the Manager from brokers
effecting portfolio transactions on behalf of the Other NB Funds and from brokers effecting portfolio transactions on behalf of the Managed Accounts may be used for the Fund’s benefit.
In certain instances, the Manager may specifically allocate brokerage for research services (including research reports on
issuers and industries as well as economic and financial data) which may otherwise be purchased for cash. While the receipt of such services has not reduced the Manager’s normal internal research activities, the Manager’s expenses could be
materially increased if it were to generate such additional information internally. To the extent such research services are
provided by others, the Manager is relieved of expenses it may otherwise incur. In some cases research services are generated by third parties but
provided to the Manager by or through broker dealers. Research obtained in this manner may be used in servicing any or all clients of the Manager and may be used in connection with clients other than those client’s whose brokerage commissions
are used to acquire the research services described herein. With regard to allocation of brokerage to acquire research services described above, the Manager always considers its best execution obligation when deciding which broker to utilize.
Insofar as Fund transactions result from active management of equity securities, and insofar as Fund transactions result from seeking capital
appreciation by selling securities whenever sales are deemed advisable without regard to the length of time the securities may have been held, it may be expected that the aggregate brokerage commissions paid by the Fund to brokers (including
to Affiliated Brokers) may be greater than if securities were selected solely on a long-term basis.
The Fund may, from time to time, loan portfolio securities to broker-dealers affiliated with NBIA (“Affiliated Borrowers”) in accordance with the
terms and conditions of an order issued by the SEC. The order exempts such transactions from the provisions of the 1940 Act that would otherwise prohibit these transactions, subject to certain conditions. In accordance with the order,
securities loans made by the Fund to Affiliated Borrowers are fully secured by cash collateral. Each loan to an Affiliated Borrower by the Fund will be made on terms at least as favorable to the Fund as comparable loans to unaffiliated
borrowers, and no loans will be made to an Affiliated Borrower unless the Affiliated Borrower represents that the terms are at least as favorable to the Fund as those it provides to unaffiliated lenders in comparable transactions. All
transactions with Affiliated Borrowers will be reviewed periodically by officers of the Fund and reported to the Board.
DISTRIBUTIONS
To permit the Fund to maintain more stable monthly distributions, the Fund may from time to time distribute less than the
entire amount of distributable cash flow received as cash distributions from its portfolio securities in a particular period. Such undistributed cash flow would be available to supplement future distributions, including distributions that
might otherwise have been reduced by a decrease in the Fund’s net cash flow due to fluctuations in cash distributions received on portfolio securities (or other sources of income) or expenses or due to an increase in the distribution rate or
interest rate on the Fund’s borrowings, Preferred Stock or Notes, if any. As a result, the distributions the Fund pays for any particular period may be more or less than the amount of cash flow received as cash distributions from portfolio
securities during such period. Undistributed cash flow received as cash distributions from portfolio securities are be included in the Fund’s NAV and, correspondingly, distributions from undistributed cash flow received as cash distributions
from portfolio securities will reduce that NAV.
For information relating to the impact of the borrowings or the issuance of Preferred Stock or Notes on the distributions made
by the Fund to Common Stockholders, see “Use of Leverage” in the Prospectus.
While any borrowings or Notes are outstanding, the Fund may not declare any cash dividend or other distribution on its Common Stock unless at the
time of such declaration the NAV of the Fund’s portfolio (determined after deducting the amount of such dividend or other distribution) is at least 300% of the principal amount of any borrowings or Notes. While any Preferred Stock is
outstanding, the Fund may not declare any cash dividend or other distribution on its Common Stock unless at the time of such declaration (1) all accumulated dividends
on the Preferred Stock have been paid and (2) the NAV of the Fund’s portfolio (determined after deducting the amount of such dividend or other distribution) is at least 200% of the liquidation value of any outstanding Preferred Stock.
DESCRIPTION OF SHARES
Common Stock
The Articles authorize the issuance of one billion (1,000,000,000) shares. The Common Stock will be issued with a par value of
$0.0001 per share. All Common Stock has equal rights as to the payment of dividends and the distribution of assets upon liquidation. Common Stock will, when issued, be fully paid and non-assessable, and will have no pre-emptive or conversion
rights or rights to cumulative voting. Whenever Preferred Stock is outstanding, Common Stockholders will not be entitled to receive any distributions from the Fund unless all accrued dividends on Preferred Stock have been paid, and unless
asset coverage (as defined in the 1940 Act) with respect to Preferred Stock would be at least 200% after giving effect to such distributions. See “Preferred Stock” below. Whenever borrowings or Notes are outstanding, Common Stockholders will
not be entitled to receive any distributions from the Fund unless asset coverage (as defined in the 1940 Act) with respect to the borrowings or Notes would be at least 300%.
The Common Stock is listed on the NYSE American. The Fund intends to hold annual meetings of stockholders so long as the
Common Stock is listed on a national securities exchange and such meetings are required as a condition to such listing.
Shares of closed-end investment companies may frequently trade at prices lower than NAV. Shares of closed-end investment companies have during some
periods traded at prices higher than NAV and during other periods traded at prices lower than NAV. There can be no assurance that shares of Common Stock or shares of other closed-end funds will trade at a price higher than NAV in the future.
NAV generally increases when interest rates decline, and decreases when interest rates rise. Whether investors will realize gains or losses upon the sale of Common Stock will not depend solely upon the Fund’s NAV but will depend entirely upon
whether the market price of the Common Stock at the time of sale is above or below the original purchase price for the shares. Since the market price of the Fund’s Common Stock will be determined by factors beyond the control of the Fund, the
Fund cannot predict whether the Common Stock will trade at, below, or above NAV or at, below or above the initial public offering price. Accordingly, the Common Stock is designed primarily for long-term investors, and investors in the Common
Stock should not view the Fund as a vehicle for trading purposes. See “Repurchase of Common Stock; Tender Offers; Conversion to Open-end Fund” and the Fund’s Prospectus under “Use of Leverage.”
Preferred Stock
The Articles authorize the Board to create additional classes of stock. Preferred Stock may be issued in one or more classes or series, with such
rights as determined by action of the Board without the approval of the Common Stockholders.
Although the terms of any Preferred Stock, including their distribution rate, voting rights, liquidation preference and redemption provisions,
would be determined by the Board (subject to applicable law and the Articles) if it authorizes a Preferred Stock offering, Preferred Stock would
likely pay distributions based on short-term rates. The liquidation preference, preference on distribution, voting rights and redemption provisions of the Preferred
Stock may be as stated below.
Limited Issuance of Preferred Stock. Under the 1940 Act, the Fund could
issue Preferred Stock with an aggregate liquidation value of up to one-half of the value of the Fund’s net assets, measured immediately after issuance of the Preferred Stock. “Liquidation value” means the original purchase price of the
shares being liquidated plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. In addition, the Fund is not permitted to declare any cash dividend or other distribution on its Common Stock unless the liquidation value of the Preferred Stock is less than
one-half of the value of the Fund’s net assets (determined after deducting the amount of such dividend or distribution) immediately after the distribution. To the extent that the Fund has outstanding any senior securities representing
indebtedness, the aggregate amount of such senior securities will be added to the total liquidation value of any outstanding Preferred Stock for purposes of these asset coverage requirements. If the Fund has any Preferred Stock outstanding,
the Fund intends to purchase or redeem Preferred Stock, if necessary, to keep the liquidation value of the Preferred Stock plus the aggregate amount of other senior securities representing indebtedness at or below one-half of the value of
the Fund’s net assets.
Distribution Preference. Any Preferred Stock would have complete
priority over the Common Stock as to distribution of assets.
Liquidation Preference. In the event of any voluntary or involuntary
liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Fund, holders of Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stockholders”) would be entitled to receive a preferential liquidating distribution (expected to equal the original purchase price per
share plus accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon, whether or not earned or declared) before any distribution of assets is made to Common Stockholders. After payment of the full amount of the liquidating distribution to which they are
entitled, Preferred Stockholders would not be entitled to any further participation in any distribution of assets by the Fund. A consolidation or merger of the Fund with or into any business trust or corporation or a sale of all or
substantially all of the assets of the Fund shall not be deemed to be a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Fund.
Voting Rights. In connection with any issuance of Preferred Stock, the Fund must comply with
Section 18(i) of the 1940 Act, which requires, among other things, that Preferred Stock be voting shares. Except as otherwise provided in the Articles or otherwise required by applicable law, Preferred Stockholders would vote together with
Common Stockholders as a single class.
In connection with the election of the Fund’s Directors, Preferred Stockholders, voting as a separate class, would also be entitled to elect two of
the Fund’s Directors, and the remaining Directors shall be elected by Common Stockholders and Preferred Stockholders, voting together as a single class. In addition, if at any time dividends on the Fund’s outstanding Preferred Stock shall be
unpaid in an amount equal to two full years’ dividends thereon, the holders of all outstanding Preferred
Stock, voting as a separate class, would be entitled to elect a majority of the Fund’s Directors until all dividends in arrears have been paid or declared and set
apart for payment.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Preferred Stock, voting as a separate class, shall be required to approve any
action requiring a vote of security holders under Section 13(a) of the 1940 Act including, among other things, changes in the Fund’s investment objectives, the conversion of the Fund from a closed-end to an open-end company, or changes in the
investment restrictions described as fundamental policies under “Investment Objectives, Policies and Limitations.” The class or series vote of Preferred Stockholders described above shall in each case be in addition to any separate vote of
the requisite percentage of Common Stock and Preferred Stock necessary to authorize the action in question.
Preferred Stockholders would not be entitled to vote on matters placed before stockholders if, at or prior to the time when a vote is required,
such shares shall have been (1) redeemed or (2) called for redemption and sufficient funds shall have been deposited in trust to effect such redemption.
Redemption, Purchase and Sale of Preferred Stock by the Fund. The terms of Preferred Stock
may provide that they are redeemable at certain times, in whole or in part, at the original purchase price per share plus accumulated dividends, that the Fund may tender for or purchase Preferred Stock and that the Fund may subsequently
resell any shares so tendered for or purchased. Any redemption or purchase of Preferred Stock by the Fund will reduce the leverage applicable to Common Stock, while any resale of shares by the Fund will increase such leverage.
The Fund currently does not intend to issue Preferred Stock. The discussion above describes the possible offering of preferred
shares by the Fund. If the Board determines to authorize such an offering, the terms of the Preferred Stock may be the same as, or different from, the terms described above, subject to applicable law and the Articles.
CERTAIN PROVISIONS IN THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
The Fund’s Articles of Incorporation (“Articles”) include provisions that could limit the ability of other entities or persons
to acquire control of the Fund or convert the Fund to an open-end fund.
The Articles require a vote by a majority of the Directors, including a majority of the Independent Fund Directors, of the Fund, and holders of at
least 75% of the shares of capital stock of the Fund outstanding and entitled to vote, except as described below, to authorize (1) the Fund’s conversion from a closed-end to an open-end investment company; (2) any merger or consolidation or
share exchange of the Fund with or into any other company; (3) the dissolution or liquidation of the Fund; (4) any sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of the Fund’s assets to any Principal Stockholder (as defined below); (5) a
change in the nature of the business of the Fund so that it would cease to be an investment company registered under the 1940 Act; (6) with certain exceptions, the issuance of any securities of the Fund to any Principal Stockholder for cash;
or (7) any transfer by the Fund of any securities of the Fund to any Principal Stockholder in exchange for cash, securities or other property having an aggregate fair market value of $1 million ($1,000,000) or more; provided, with respect to
(1) through (5), if such action has been authorized by the affirmative vote of 75% of the Directors, including a majority of the Independent Fund Directors, then the affirmative vote of the holders of only a majority of the Fund’s shares of
capital stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the time is required; and provided, further, with respect to (6) and (7), if such transaction has been
authorized by the affirmative vote of 75% of the Directors, including a majority of the Independent Fund Directors, no stockholder vote is required to authorize such
action. The term “Principal Stockholder” means any person, entity or group that holds, directly or indirectly, more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Fund and includes any associates or affiliates of such person or entity or of any
member of the group. None of the foregoing provisions may be amended except by the vote of at least 75% of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Fund outstanding and entitled to vote thereon. As discussed in the Prospectus, certain
of the actions described above also require approval by the holders of the Preferred Shares, tallied separately. Certain of the transactions described above, even if approved by stockholders, may be prohibited by the 1940 Act.
The percentage votes required under these provisions, which are greater than the minimum requirements under Maryland law or the 1940 Act, will make
more difficult a change in the Fund’s business or management and may have the effect of depriving Common Stockholders of an opportunity to sell shares at a premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging a third party from seeking to
obtain control of the Fund in a tender offer or similar transaction. The Board believes that the provisions of the Articles relating to such higher votes are in the best interest of the Fund and its stockholders.
The Bylaws contain provisions the effect of which is to prevent matters, including nominations of Directors, from being
considered at a stockholders’ meeting where the Fund has not received notice of the matters generally at least 120 but no more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of mailing of the preceding year’s annual meeting of
stockholders.
Reference should be made to the Articles and Bylaws on file with the SEC for the full text of these provisions.
REPURCHASE OF COMMON STOCK; TENDER OFFERS;
CONVERSION TO OPEN-END FUND
The Fund is a closed-end management investment company, and as such its stockholders do not have the right to cause the Fund to redeem their
shares. Instead, the Fund’s Common Stock trades in the open market at a price that is a function of several factors, including distribution levels (which are in turn affected by expenses), NAV, call protection, distribution stability,
portfolio credit quality, relative demand for and supply of such shares in the market, general market and economic conditions and other factors. Shares of a closed-end management investment company may frequently trade at prices lower than
NAV. The Board regularly monitors the relationship between the market price and NAV of the Common Stock. If the Common Stock were to trade at a substantial discount to NAV for an extended period of time, the Board may consider the repurchase
of its Common Stock on the open market or in private transactions, the making of a tender offer for such shares, or the conversion of the Fund to an open-end management investment company. The Fund cannot assure you that the Board will decide
to take or propose any of these actions, or that share repurchases or tender offers will actually reduce market discount.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time when the Fund has Preferred Stock outstanding, the Fund may not purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire
any of its Common Stock unless (1) all accrued dividends on Preferred Stock have been paid and (2) at the time of such purchase, redemption or acquisition, the NAV of the Fund’s portfolio (determined after deducting the acquisition price of
the Common Stock) is at least 200% of the liquidation value of the outstanding Preferred Stock
(expected to equal the original purchase price per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon).
Subject to its investment limitations, the Fund may borrow to finance the repurchase of shares or to make a tender offer.
Interest on any borrowings to finance share repurchase transactions or the accumulation of cash by the Fund in anticipation of share repurchases or tenders will reduce the Fund’s net income. Any share repurchase, tender offer or borrowing
that might be approved by the Board would have to comply with the 1934 Act and the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
The Board may also from time to time consider submitting to the holders of the shares of stock of the Fund a proposal to convert
the Fund to an open-end investment company. In determining whether to exercise its sole discretion to submit this issue to stockholders, the Board would consider all factors then relevant, including the relationship of the market price of the
Common Stock to NAV, the extent to which the Fund’s capital structure is leveraged and the possibility of re-leveraging, the spread, if any, between the yields on securities in the Fund’s portfolio and interest and dividend charges on any
Preferred Stock and/or Notes issued by the Fund and general market and economic conditions.
See “Anti-Takeover and Other Provisions in the Articles of Incorporation” in the Prospectus and “Certain Provisions in the
Articles of Incorporation” in this SAI for a discussion of voting requirements applicable to conversion of the Fund to an open-end company. If the Fund converted to an open-end management investment company, it would be required to redeem all
Preferred Stock and Notes then outstanding (requiring in turn that it liquidate a portion of its investment portfolio), if any, and the Fund’s Common Stock would no longer be listed on the NYSE American. In contrast to a closed-end management
investment company, stockholders of an open-end management investment company may require the company to redeem their shares at any time (except in certain circumstances as authorized by or under the 1940 Act) at their NAV, less any
redemption charge that is in effect at the time of redemption. In order to avoid maintaining large cash positions or liquidating favorable investments to meet redemptions, open-end companies typically engage in a continuous offering of their
common stock. Open-end companies are thus subject to periodic asset in-flows and out-flows that can complicate portfolio management.
The repurchase by the Fund of its shares at prices below NAV will result in an increase in the NAV of those shares that remain outstanding.
However, there can be no assurance that share repurchases or tenders at or below NAV will result in the Fund’s shares trading at a price equal to their NAV. Nevertheless, the fact that the Fund’s shares may be the subject of repurchase or
tender offers at NAV from time to time, or that the Fund may be converted to an open-end company, may reduce any spread between market price and NAV that might otherwise exist.
In addition, a purchase by the Fund of its Common Stock will decrease the Fund’s total assets. This would likely have the effect of increasing the
Fund’s expense ratio. Any purchase by the Fund of its Common Stock at a time when Preferred Stock or Notes are outstanding will increase the leverage applicable to the outstanding Common Stock then remaining. See the Fund’s Prospectus under
“Risks – Leverage Risk.”
Before deciding whether to take any action if the Fund’s Common Stock trades below NAV, the Board would consider all relevant factors, including
the extent and duration of the discount, the
liquidity of the Fund’s portfolio, the impact of any action that might be taken on the Fund or its stockholders, market considerations and alternative actions that
might be taken. Based on these considerations, even if the Fund’s Common Stock should trade at a discount, the Board may determine that, in the interest of the Fund and its stockholders, that the Fund should not be converted to an open-end
structure and, perhaps, that no action should be taken at that time.
TAX MATTERS
The following is a brief general summary of certain material federal tax considerations affecting the Fund and its stockholders with respect to the
purchase, ownership, and disposition of Common Stock. It is based on the Code, the regulations thereunder, judicial authorities, published positions of the IRS, and other applicable authorities, all as in effect on the date hereof and all of
which are subject to change or differing interpretations (possibly with retroactive effect); no assurance can be given that future legislation, regulations, court decisions, and/or administrative pronouncements will not significantly change
applicable law and materially affect the conclusions expressed herein, and any such change, even though made after an investor has invested in the Fund, could be applied retroactively. Tax matters are complicated, and this discussion does not
purport to be complete or to deal with all aspects of federal income taxation that may be relevant to an investor in light of his, her, or its particular circumstances or to Common Stockholders (such as those enumerated in the Prospectus)
who or that are subject to special federal tax rules.
Unless otherwise noted, this discussion applies only to a U.S. Stockholder that holds Common Stock as a capital asset (generally, an asset held for
investment). If a partnership holds Common Stock, the federal income tax treatment of a partner in the partnership generally will depend on the partner’s status and the partnership’s activities.
The tax consequences of an investment in and holding Common Stock will depend
on the particular facts of each investor’s situation. Prospective investors are advised to consult their own tax advisers with respect to the application to their own circumstances of the general federal income tax rules summarized below,
and with respect to other federal, state, local, or foreign tax consequences to them, before making an investment in Common Stock.
Taxation of the Fund
The Fund intends to qualify each taxable year for treatment as a RIC. To qualify for that treatment, the Fund must, among other things:
(a) derive at least 90% of its gross income each taxable year from interest, dividends, payments with respect to securities loans
and gains from the sale or other disposition of securities or foreign currencies, or other income (including gains from options, futures or forward contracts) derived with respect to its business of investing in securities or those
currencies and net income derived from an interest in a qualified publicly traded partnership (“QPTP”) (“Income Requirement”);
(b) distribute with respect to each taxable year at least the
sum of 90% of its investment company taxable income (consisting generally of net investment income, the excess, if any, of net short-term capital gain over net long-term capital loss, and net gains from certain foreign currency
transactions, if any, all determined without regard to any deduction for dividends paid) and
90% of its net exempt interest, if any, for that year (“Distribution Requirement”); and
(c) diversify its holdings so that, at the end of each quarter
of its taxable year, (1) at least 50% of the value of its total assets is represented by cash and cash items, Government securities, securities of other RICs and other securities limited in respect of any one issuer to a value not greater
than 5% of the value of the Fund’s total assets and to not more than 10% of the issuer’s outstanding voting securities, and (2) not more than 25% of the value of the Fund’s total assets is invested in the securities (other than those of the
Government or other RICs) of any one issuer or of two or more issuers that the Fund controls and are engaged in the same, similar or related trades or businesses, or the securities of one or more QPTPs (“Diversification Requirements”).
If the Fund qualifies for treatment as a RIC, it will not be subject to federal income tax on net income and realized gains it
timely distributes to its stockholders. If the Fund failed to qualify for that treatment for any taxable year — either (1) by failing to satisfy the Distribution Requirement, even if it satisfied the Income and Diversification Requirements,
or (2) by failing to satisfy the Income Requirement and/or either Diversification Requirement and was unable to, or determined not to, avail itself of Code provisions that enable a RIC to cure a failure to satisfy any of the Income and
Diversification Requirements as long as the failure “is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect” and the RIC pays a deductible tax calculated in accordance with those provisions and meets certain other requirements — then for
federal income tax purposes it would be taxed as an ordinary corporation on the full amount of its taxable income for that year without being able to deduct the distributions it makes to its stockholders. In addition, for those purposes the
stockholders would treat all those distributions, including distributions of net capital gain (i.e., the excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss), as dividends to the
extent of the Fund’s earnings and profits, taxable as ordinary income, except that, for individual and certain other non-corporate stockholders (each, an “individual stockholder”), the part thereof that is “qualified dividend income” (“QDI”)
would be subject to federal income tax at the rates for net capital gain — a maximum of 15% for a single stockholder with taxable income not exceeding $492,300 ($553,850 for married stockholders filing jointly) and 20% for those individual
stockholders with taxable income exceeding those respective amounts (which apply for 2023 and will be adjusted for inflation annually); and all or part of those dividends distributions might be eligible for the dividends received deduction.
Furthermore, the Fund could be required to recognize unrealized gains, pay substantial taxes and interest, and make substantial distributions before requalifying for RIC treatment.
The Fund intends to distribute at least annually to its stockholders all or substantially all of its investment company taxable income. The Fund
also will annually (1) distribute its net capital gain or (2) retain all or a portion of its net capital gain for investment. If the Fund retains any such income or gain, it will be subject to tax at regular corporate rates on the retained
amount. See “Taxation of the Stockholders” below for a description of the consequences to the Fund’s stockholders of its retention of net capital gain.
To the extent the Fund fails to distribute in a calendar year at least an amount equal to the sum of (1) 98% of its ordinary income for that year
plus (2) 98.2% of its capital gain net income for the one-year period ending October 31 of that year plus (3) 100% of any retained amount of either from the prior year, it will be subject to a nondeductible 4% excise tax (“Excise Tax”). For
these purposes, the Fund will be treated as having distributed any amount with respect to which it pays income tax. The Fund intends generally to make distributions sufficient to avoid imposition of the Excise Tax.
If the Fund issues Preferred Stock, then, at any time when Preferred Stock is outstanding, and the Fund’s assets are
insufficient to satisfy certain requirements, the Fund will be required to suspend distributions to holders of the Common Stock until those requirements are satisfied. Doing so may prevent the Fund from satisfying the Distribution Requirement
and may therefore jeopardize its qualification for treatment as a RIC or cause it to incur an income tax or Excise Tax liability or both.
Taxation of the Stockholders
Distributions on the Fund’s shares to a stockholder are generally subject to federal income tax as described in the Prospectus
and below, even though those distributions may economically represent a return of the stockholder’s investment. Such a distribution is likely to occur in respect of shares purchased when the Fund has undistributed income or gains that are
either unrealized or realized but not distributed. Those realized gains may be required to be distributed even when the Fund has unrealized losses. Distributions are taxable to a stockholder even if they are paid from net income or gains the
Fund earned before the stockholder’s investment (and thus included in the price the stockholder paid).
The Fund receives ordinary income generally in the form of dividends and/or interest on its investments. The Fund may also
recognize ordinary income from other sources, including, but not limited to, certain gains on foreign currency-related transactions. This income, less expenses incurred in the operation of the Fund, constitutes the Fund’s net investment
income from which dividends may be paid. If you are a taxable investor, distributions of net investment income generally are taxable as ordinary income to the extent of the Fund’s earnings and profits. A portion of the income dividends paid
by the Fund may be qualified dividend income eligible to be taxed at reduced rates.
Dividends and other distributions by the Fund are generally treated under the Code as received by the stockholders at the time
the dividend or distribution is made. However, if any dividend or distribution is declared by the Fund in October, November or December of any calendar year and payable to its stockholders of record on a specified date in such a month but is
actually paid during the following January, such dividend or distribution will be deemed to have been received by each stockholder on December 31 of the year in which the dividend was declared.
If the Fund retains any net capital gain, it may designate all or part of the retained amount as undistributed capital gains in a notice to its
stockholders. If the Fund makes such a designation, it would be required to pay federal income tax at the rate of 21% on the undistributed gain (“Fund tax”) and each stockholder subject to federal income tax (1) would be required to include
in income for federal income tax purposes, as long-term capital gain, his or her proportionate share of the designated gain (which, in the case of an individual stockholder, would be taxed at the rates for net capital gain described above),
(2) would be entitled to credit his or her proportionate share of the Fund tax against his or her federal income tax liability, if any, and to claim a refund to the extent the credit exceeds that liability, and (3) would increase the tax
basis in his or her Common Stock by an amount equal to the difference between the included gain and that share of the Fund tax.
For U.S. individuals with income exceeding $200,000 ($250,000 if married and filing jointly), a 3.8% Medicare contribution tax will apply on all or
a portion of their “net investment income,” including interest, dividends, and capital gains, which generally includes taxable distributions received from the Fund. This 3.8% tax also applies to all or a portion of the undistributed net
investment income of certain stockholders that are estates and trusts.
A sale or exchange of shares in the Fund may give rise to a gain or loss. In general, any gain or loss realized upon a taxable disposition of
shares will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the shares have been held for more than 12 months. Otherwise, the gain or loss on the taxable disposition of shares will be treated as short-term capital gain or loss. However, any
loss realized upon a taxable disposition of shares held for six months or less will be treated as long-term, rather than short-term, to the extent of any long-term capital gain distributions received (or deemed received) by the stockholder
with respect to the shares. All or a portion of any loss realized upon a taxable disposition of shares will be disallowed if shares of the same Fund are purchased within 30 days before or after the disposition. In such a case, the basis of
the newly purchased shares will be adjusted to reflect the disallowed loss.
As noted above, for U.S. individuals with income exceeding $200,000 ($250,000 if married and filing jointly), a 3.8% Medicare contribution tax will
apply on “net investment income,” including interest, dividends, and capital gains, which generally includes taxable distributions received from the Fund and taxable gains on the disposition of shares of the Fund.
The Fund generally is required to withhold and to remit to the U.S. Treasury a percentage of the taxable distributions and sale or redemption
proceeds paid to any stockholder who fails to properly furnish a correct taxpayer identification number, who has under-reported dividend or interest income, or who fails to certify that he, she or it is not subject to such withholding. The
backup withholding tax rate is currently 24%.
A stockholder’s basis in shares of Common Stock that he or she acquired or acquires after December 31, 2011 (“Covered Shares”), will be determined
in accordance with the Funds’ default method, which is average basis, unless the stockholder affirmatively elects in writing (which may be electronic) to use a different acceptable basis determination method, such as a specific identification
method. The basis determination method a Stockholder elects (or the default method) may not be changed with respect to a redemption of Covered Shares after the settlement date of the redemption.
In addition to the requirement to report the gross proceeds from a redemption of shares, the Fund (or its administrative agent) must report to the
Service and furnish to its stockholders the basis information for Covered Shares and indicate whether they had a short-term (one year or less) or long-term (more than one year) holding period. Fund stockholders should consult with their tax
advisers to determine the best Service-accepted basis determination method for their tax situation and to obtain more information about how the basis reporting law applies to them.
Non-U.S. Stockholders
Distributions of the Fund’s “investment company taxable income” to non-U.S. stockholders (including interest income and the
excess of net short-term capital gain over net long-term capital losses) will generally be subject to withholding of federal tax at a 30% rate (or lower rate provided by an applicable treaty) as dividends to the extent of the Fund’s current
and accumulated earnings and profits unless the distributions are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the non-U.S. stockholders, and, if an income tax treaty applies, attributable to a permanent establishment in the United
States of the non-U.S. stockholders. In the case of such effectively connected income, the distributions will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the rates applicable to U.S. persons, plus, in certain cases where the Non-U.S.
stockholders is a corporation, a branch profits tax at a 30% rate (or
lower rate provided by an applicable treaty). Exemptions from the 30% withholding tax are provided for dividends properly designated as interest
related dividends or as short-term capital gain dividends paid by the Fund with respect to its qualified net interest income or qualified short-term gain.
Actual or deemed distributions of the Fund’s net capital gains (i.e., net long-term
capital gains in excess of short-term capital losses) to a non-U.S. stockholders, and gains realized by a non-U.S. stockholders upon the sale of Fund shares, will not be subject to federal withholding tax and generally will not be subject to
U.S. federal income tax unless (a) the distributions or gains are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the non-U.S. stockholder and, if an income tax treaty applies, are attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed
base maintained by the non-U.S. stockholder in the United States, or (b) the non-U.S. stockholder is an individual, has been present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable, and certain other conditions are satisfied.
If the Fund distributes its net capital gains in the form of deemed rather than actual distributions, a non-U.S. stockholder will
be entitled to a U.S. federal income tax credit or tax refund equal to the stockholder’s allocable share of the tax the Fund pays on the capital gains deemed to have been distributed. In order to obtain the refund, the non-U.S. stockholder
must obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number and file a U.S. federal income tax return even if the non-U.S. stockholder would not otherwise be required to obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number or file a U.S. federal income tax
return. For a corporate non-U.S. stockholder, distributions (both actual and deemed), and gains realized upon the sale of shares that are effectively connected to a U.S. trade or business may, under certain circumstances, be subject to an
additional “branch profits tax” at a 30% rate (or at a lower rate if provided for by an applicable treaty).
A non-U.S. stockholder who is a non-resident alien individual, and who is otherwise subject to withholding of federal tax, may be
subject to information reporting and backup withholding of U.S. federal income tax on dividends unless the non-U.S. stockholder provides the Fund or the dividend paying agent with an IRS Form W-8BEN (or an acceptable substitute form) or
otherwise meets documentary evidence requirements for establishing that it is a non-U.S. stockholder or otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding.
Under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”), “foreign financial institutions” (“FFIs”) or “non-financial foreign entities” (“NFFEs”)
that are Fund stockholders may be subject to a generally nonrefundable 30% withholding tax on income dividends the Fund pays. Proposed regulations (effective while pending) have been issued to eliminate the application of the withholding tax
to capital gain distributions and the proceeds from the repurchase of Common Stock that was scheduled to take effect in 2019. As discussed below, the FATCA withholding tax generally can be avoided (a) by an FFI, if it reports certain
information regarding direct and indirect ownership of financial accounts U.S. persons hold with the FFI and (b) by an NFFE, if (i) it certifies that it has no substantial U.S. persons as owners or (ii) it does have such owners and reports
information relating to them to the withholding agent. The U.S. Treasury Department has negotiated intergovernmental agreements (“IGAs”) with certain countries and is in various stages of negotiations with other foreign countries with respect
to one or more alternative approaches to implement FATCA; entities in those countries may be required to comply with the terms of the IGA instead of Treasury regulations.
An FFI can avoid FATCA withholding by becoming a “participating FFI,” which requires the FFI to enter into a tax compliance agreement with the IRS
under section 1471(b) of the Code. Under such an agreement, a participating FFI agrees to (1) verify and document whether it has U.S. accountholders, (2) report certain information regarding their accounts to the IRS, and (3) meet certain
other specified requirements.
An FFI resident in a country that has entered into a Model I IGA with the United States must report to that country’s government (pursuant to the
terms of the applicable IGA and applicable law), which will, in turn, report to the IRS. An FFI resident in a Model II IGA country generally must comply with U.S. regulatory requirements, with certain exceptions, including the treatment of
recalcitrant accountholders. An FFI resident in one of those countries that complies with whichever of the foregoing that applies will be exempt from FATCA withholding.
An NFFE that is the beneficial owner of a payment from the Fund can avoid FATCA withholding generally by certifying that it does not have any
substantial U.S. owners or by providing the name, address, and taxpayer identification number of each such owner. The NFFE will report to the Fund or other applicable withholding agent, which will, in turn, report information to the IRS.
Those foreign stockholders also may fall into certain exempt, excepted, or deemed compliant categories established by Treasury regulations, IGAs,
and other guidance regarding FATCA. An FFI or NFFE that invests in the Fund will need to provide the Fund with documentation properly certifying the entity’s status under FATCA to avoid FATCA withholding. The requirements imposed by FATCA are
different from, and in addition to, the tax certification rules to avoid backup withholding described in the Prospectus. Foreign investors are urged to consult their tax advisers regarding the application of these requirements to their own
situation and the impact thereof on their investment in the Fund.
Tax Consequences of Certain Investments
REMICs. The Fund may invest in REITs that
(1) hold residual interests in real estate mortgage investment conduits (“REMICs”) or (2) engage in mortgage securitization transactions that cause the REITs to be taxable mortgage pools (“TMPs”) or have a qualified REIT subsidiary that is
a TMP. A portion of the net income allocable to REMIC residual interest holders may be an “excess inclusion.” The Code authorizes the issuance of regulations dealing with the taxation and reporting of excess inclusion income of REITs and
RICs that hold residual REMIC interests and of REITs, or qualified REIT subsidiaries, that are TMPs. Although those regulations have not yet been issued, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued a notice in 2006 (“Notice”) announcing
that, pending the issuance of further guidance (which has not yet been issued), the IRS would apply the principles in the following paragraphs to all excess inclusion income, whether from REMIC residual interests or TMPs.
The Notice provides that a REIT must (1) determine whether it or its qualified REIT subsidiary (or a part of either) is a TMP and, if so, calculate
the TMP’s excess inclusion income under a “reasonable method,” (2) allocate its excess inclusion income to its stockholders generally in proportion to dividends paid, (3) inform stockholders that are not “disqualified organizations” (i.e., governmental units and tax-exempt entities that are not subject to tax on their unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”)) of the amount and character of the excess inclusion income allocated
thereto, (4) pay tax (at the highest federal income tax rate imposed on corporations) on the excess inclusion income allocable to its stockholders that are disqualified organizations, and (5) apply the withholding tax provisions with respect
to the excess inclusion part of dividends paid to foreign persons without regard to any treaty exception or reduction in tax rate. Excess inclusion income allocated to certain tax-exempt entities (including qualified retirement plans,
individual retirement accounts, and public charities) constitutes UBTI to them.
A RIC with excess inclusion income is subject to rules identical to those in clauses (2) through (5) above (substituting “that
are nominees” for “that are not ‘disqualified organizations’” in clause (3) and inserting “record” after “its” in clause (4)). The Notice further provides that a RIC is not required to report the amount and character of the excess inclusion
income allocated to its stockholders that are not nominees, except that (1) a RIC with excess inclusion income from all sources that exceeds 1% of its gross income must do so and (2) any other RIC must do so by taking into account only excess
inclusion income allocated to the RIC from REITs the excess inclusion income of which exceeded 3% of its dividends. The Fund will not invest directly in REMIC residual interests and does not intend to invest in REITs that, to its knowledge,
invest in those interests or are TMPs or have a qualified REIT subsidiary that is a TMP.
After calendar year-end, REITs can and often do change the category (e.g., ordinary income dividend,
capital gain distribution, or return of capital) of the distributions they have made during that year, which would result at that time in the Fund also having to re-categorize some of the distributions it made to its stockholders. These
changes would be reflected in the annual Form 1099, together with other tax information. Those forms generally will be distributed to stockholders in February of each year, although the Fund may, in one or more years, request from the IRS an
extension of time to distribute those forms until mid-March to enable it to receive the latest information it can from the REITs in which it invests and thereby accurately report that information to its stockholders on a single form (rather
than having to send amended forms).
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, the Code allows individuals and certain
non-corporate entities a deduction for 20% of “qualified REIT dividends.” Treasury Regulations allow a RIC to pass the character of its qualified REIT dividends through to its shareholders, provided they meet certain holding period
requirements. As a result, the Fund stockholder will be eligible to receive the benefit of the 20% deduction with respect to the Fund’s REIT-based dividends.
Hedging Transactions. The use of hedging
strategies, such as writing (selling) and purchasing options and futures contracts and entering into forward currency contracts, involves complex rules that will determine for income tax purposes the amount, character and timing of
recognition of the gains and losses the Fund realizes in connection therewith. Gains from the disposition of foreign currencies (except certain gains that may be excluded by future regulations), and gains from options, futures and forward
currency contracts the Fund derives with respect to its business of investing in securities or foreign currencies, will be treated as qualifying income under the Income Requirement. Certain of the Fund’s investment practices are subject to
special and complex federal income tax provisions that may, among other things, (1) disallow, suspend or otherwise limit the allowance of certain losses or deductions, (2) convert lower taxed long-term capital gain to higher taxed
short-term capital gain or ordinary income, (3) convert an ordinary loss or a deduction to a capital loss (the deductibility of which is more limited), (4) cause the Fund to recognize income or gain without a corresponding receipt of cash,
(5) adversely affect the timing as to when a purchase or sale of securities is deemed to occur and (6) adversely alter the characterization of certain complex financial transactions. The Fund will monitor its transactions and may make
certain tax elections to mitigate the effect of these rules and prevent its disqualification as a RIC.
Foreign Securities. Interest
and dividends the Fund receives, and gains it realizes, on foreign securities may be subject to income, withholding or other taxes imposed by foreign countries and
U.S. possessions that would reduce the yield and/or total return on its securities. Tax treaties
between certain countries and the United States may reduce or eliminate these taxes, however, and many foreign countries do not impose taxes on capital gains in respect of investments by foreign investors.
The Fund may invest in the stock of “passive foreign investment companies” (“PFICs”). A PFIC is any foreign corporation (with
certain exceptions) that, in general, meets either of the following tests for a taxable year: (1) at least 75% of its gross income is passive or (2) an average of at least 50% of its assets produce, or are held for the production of, passive
income. Under certain circumstances, if the Fund holds stock of a PFIC, it will be subject to federal income tax on a portion of any “excess distribution” the Fund receives on the stock or of any gain on its disposition of the stock
(collectively, “PFIC income”), plus interest thereon, even if the Fund distributes the PFIC income as a taxable dividend to its stockholders. The balance of the PFIC income will be included in the Fund’s investment company taxable income and,
accordingly, will not be taxable to it to the extent it distributes that income to its stockholders. Fund distributions thereof will not be eligible for the 15% and 20% maximum federal income tax rates on individual stockholders’ QDI.
If the Fund invests in a PFIC and elects to treat the PFIC as a “qualified electing fund” (“QEF”), then in lieu of the Fund’s incurring the
foregoing tax and interest obligation, it would be required to include in income each year its pro rata share of the QEF’s annual ordinary earnings and net capital gain -- which the Fund most likely
would have to distribute to satisfy the Distribution Requirement and avoid imposition of the Excise Tax -- even if the Fund did not receive those earnings and gain from the QEF. In most instances it will be very difficult, if not impossible,
to make this election because of certain requirements thereof.
The Fund may elect to “mark-to-market” any stock in a PFIC it owns at the end of its taxable year. “Marking-to-market,” in this context, means
including in gross income each taxable year (and treating as ordinary income) the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the stock over the Fund’s adjusted basis therein as of the end of that year. Pursuant to the election, the Fund also
may deduct (as an ordinary, not a capital, loss) the excess, if any, of its adjusted basis in PFIC stock over the fair market value thereof as of the taxable year-end, but only to the extent of any net marked-to-market gains with respect to
that stock the Fund included in income for prior taxable years under the election. The Fund’s adjusted basis in each PFIC’s stock subject to the election would be adjusted to reflect the amounts of income included and deductions taken
thereunder.
Investors should be aware that determining whether a foreign corporation is a PFIC is a fact-intensive determination that is based on various facts
and circumstances and thus is subject to change, and the principles and methodology used in determining whether a foreign corporation is a PFIC are subject to interpretation. As a result, the Fund may not be able, at the time it acquires a
foreign corporation’s shares, to ascertain whether the corporation is a PFIC and that a foreign corporation may become a PFIC after the Fund acquires shares therein. While the Fund generally will seek to avoid investing in PFIC shares to
avoid the tax consequences detailed above, there are no guarantees that it will be able to do so, and it reserves the right to make such investments as a matter of its investment policy.
Securities Issued or Purchased at a Discount. The Fund may acquire zero coupon or other securities issued with original issue discount (“OID”). As a holder of those securities, the Fund must include in gross income the OID that accrues on them during the
taxable year, even if it receives no corresponding payment on them during the year. Because the Fund annually must distribute
substantially all of its investment company taxable income, including any OID, to satisfy the
Distribution Requirement and avoid imposition of the Excise Tax, it may be required in a particular taxable year to distribute as a dividend an amount that is greater than the total amount of cash it actually receives. Those distributions
will be made from the Fund’s cash assets or from the proceeds of sales of its portfolio securities, if necessary. The Fund may realize capital gains or losses from those sales, which would increase or decrease its investment company taxable
income and/or net capital gain.
Some futures contracts, certain foreign currency contracts, and “nonequity” options (i.e., certain listed options, such as
those on a “broad-based” securities index) — except any “securities futures contract” that is not a “dealer securities futures contract” (both as defined in the Code) and any interest rate swap, currency swap, basis swap, interest rate cap,
interest rate floor, commodity swap, equity swap, equity index swap, credit default swap, or similar agreement — in which the Fund invests may be subject to Code section 1256 (collectively, “Section 1256 contracts”). Any Section 1256
contracts the Fund holds at the end of its taxable year (and generally for purposes of the Excise Tax, on October 31 of each year) must be “marked to market” (that is, treated as having been sold at that time for their fair market value) for
federal tax purposes, with the result that unrealized gains or losses will be treated as though they were realized. Sixty percent of any net gain or loss recognized as a result of these deemed sales, and 60% of any net realized gain or loss
from any actual sales, of Section 1256 contracts are treated as long-term capital gain or loss; the remainder is treated as short-term capital gain or loss. These rules may operate to increase the amount that the Fund must distribute to
satisfy the Distribution Requirement (i.e., with respect to the portion treated as short-term capital gain), which will be taxable to its stockholders as ordinary income when distributed to them, and to increase the net capital gain the Fund
recognizes, without in either case increasing the cash available to it. The Fund may elect to exclude certain transactions from the operation of these rules, although doing so may have the effect of increasing the relative proportion of
short-term capital gain (taxable to its stockholders as ordinary income when distributed to them) and/or increasing the amount of dividends it must distribute to meet the Distribution Requirement and avoid imposition of the Excise Tax.
The premium the Fund receives for writing (selling) a put or call option is not included in gross income at the time of
receipt. If an option written (sold) by the Fund expires, it realizes a short-term capital gain equal to the amount of the premium it received for writing the option. When the Fund terminates its obligations under such an option by entering
into a closing transaction, it realizes a short-term capital gain (or loss), depending on whether the cost of the closing transaction is less (or more) than that amount. When an option written by the Fund is exercised, it is treated as having
sold the underlying security, producing long-term or short-term capital gain or loss, depending on the holding period of the underlying security and whether the sum of the option price it receives on the exercise plus the premium it received
when it wrote the option is more or less than its basis in the underlying security.
Under Code section 988, gains or losses (1) from the disposition of foreign currencies, including forward contracts, (2) except
in certain circumstances, from Financial Instruments on or involving foreign currencies and from notional principal contracts (e.g., swaps, caps, floors, and collars) involving payments denominated in foreign currencies, (3) on the
disposition of each foreign-currency-denominated debt security that are attributable to fluctuations in the value of the foreign currency between the dates of acquisition and disposition of the security, and (4) that are attributable to
exchange rate fluctuations between the time the Fund accrues interest, dividends, or other
receivables or expenses or other liabilities denominated in a foreign currency and the time it actually collects the receivables or pays the
liabilities generally will be treated as ordinary income or loss. These gains or losses will increase or decrease the amount of the Fund’s investment company taxable income to be distributed to its stockholders as ordinary income, rather than
increasing or decreasing the amount of its net capital gain. If the Fund’s section 988 losses exceed other investment company taxable income for a taxable year, the Fund would not be able to distribute any dividends, and any distributions
made during that year before the losses were realized would be recharacterized as a return of capital to stockholders, rather than as a dividend, thereby reducing each stockholder’s basis in his or her shares of Common Stock. Although the
Fund values its assets daily in terms of U.S. dollars, it does not intend to convert its holdings of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars on a daily basis. The Fund will do so from time to time, incurring the costs of currency conversion.
If the Fund has an “appreciated financial position” — generally, an interest (including an interest through an option, futures
or forward contract, or short sale) with respect to any stock, debt instrument (other than “straight debt”), or partnership interest the fair market value of which exceeds its adjusted basis — and enters into a “constructive sale” of the
position, the Fund will be treated as having made an actual sale thereof, with the result that it will recognize gain at that time. A constructive sale generally consists of a short sale, an offsetting notional principal contract, or a
futures or forward contract the Fund or a related person enters into with respect to the same or substantially identical property. In addition, if the appreciated financial position is itself a short sale or such a contract, acquisition of
the underlying property or substantially identical property will be deemed a constructive sale. The foregoing will not apply, however, to any Fund’s transaction during any taxable year that otherwise would be treated as a constructive sale if
the transaction is closed within 30 days after the end of that year and the Fund holds the appreciated financial position unhedged for 60 days after that closing (i.e., at no time during that 60-day period is the Fund’s risk of loss regarding
that position reduced by reason of certain specified transactions with respect to substantial identical or related property, such as having an option to sell, being contractually obligated to sell, making a short sale of, or granting an
option to buy substantially identical stock or securities).
* * *
The foregoing is only a general summary of some of the important federal tax considerations generally affecting the Fund and its stockholders. No
attempt is made to present a complete explanation of the federal tax treatment of the Fund’s activities, and this discussion is not intended to be a substitute for careful tax planning. Accordingly, potential investors are urged to consult
their own tax advisers for more detailed information and for information regarding any state, local or foreign taxes applicable to the Fund and their purchasing, holding and disposing of Common Stock.
REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS
Stockholders of the Fund receive unaudited semi-annual financial statements, as well as year-end financial statements audited
by the independent auditors for the Fund. The Fund’s statements show the investments owned by it and the market values thereof and provide other information about the Fund and its operations.
CUSTODIAN, TRANSFER AGENT AND DIVIDEND DISBURSEMENT AGENT
State Street Bank and Trust Company, One Lincoln Street, Boston, MA 02111, serves as custodian for assets of the Fund.
American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC serves as the transfer agent, registrar and distribution disbursement agent for the Common Stock. American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC serves as agent for the Distribution Reinvestment Plan relating to the Common Stock.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Ernst & Young LLP, 200 Clarendon Street, Boston, MA 02116, serves as independent auditors for the Fund. Ernst & Young LLP provides audit services, tax return preparation and assistance and consultation in connection with review
of the Fund’s filings with the SEC.
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES
A control person is a person who beneficially owns, either directly or indirectly, more than 25% of the voting securities of a company. As of
March 9, 2023, the Fund did not know of any person or entity who “controlled” the Fund.
In addition, the Directors and officers of the Fund, in the aggregate, owned less than 1% of the Fund’s outstanding shares of Common Stock as of
March 9, 2023. Information regarding each Director’s and portfolio manager’s ownership of shares of Common Stock is set forth above under “Ownership of Securities.”
As of March 9, 2023, the Fund did not know of any person who owned of record or beneficially 5% or more of the outstanding shares of Common
Stock of the Fund other than those listed below.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
Amount of
Beneficial
Ownership
|
Percent of
Class
|
First Trust Portfolios L.P.
First Trust Advisors L.P.
The Charger Corporation
120 East Liberty Drive, Suite 400
Wheaton, IL 60187
|
3,895,956
|
8.21%(1)
|
(1) |
Based on a Schedule 13G filed by First Trust Portfolios L.P., First Trust Advisors L.P. and The Charger Corporation on January 20, 2023.
|
COUNSEL
K&L Gates LLP, 1601 K Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20006, will pass upon certain legal matters in connection with shares of Common Stock
offered by the Fund, and also acts as counsel to the Fund.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The audited financial statements included in the Fund’s Annual Report on Form N-CSR for the fiscal year ended October
31, 2022 (the “Annual Report”), together with the report of Ernst & Young LLP for the Fund’s Annual Report, are incorporated herein by reference to the Fund’s Annual Report. All other portions of the Annual Report are not
incorporated herein by reference and are not part of the registration statement, the SAI, the Prospectus or any Prospectus Supplement.
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
A Registration Statement on Form N-2, including any amendments thereto, relating to the shares of the Fund offered hereby, has been filed by the
Fund with the SEC, Washington, D.C. The Fund’s Prospectus and this SAI do not contain all of the information set forth in the Registration Statement, including any exhibits and schedules thereto. For further information with respect to the
Fund and the shares offered or to be offered hereby, reference is made to the Fund’s Registration Statement. Statements contained in the Fund’s Prospectus and this SAI as to the contents of any contract or other document referred to are not
necessarily complete and in each instance reference is made to the copy of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement,
each such statement being qualified in all respects by such reference. Copies of the Registration Statement may be inspected without charge at the SEC’s principal
office in Washington, D.C., and copies of all or any part thereof may be obtained from the SEC upon the payment of certain fees prescribed by the SEC.
APPENDIX A RATINGS
Long-Term and Short-Term Debt Securities Rating Descriptions
S&P Global Ratings -- Long-Term Issue Credit Ratings*:
The following descriptions have been published by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC.
AAA – An obligation rated ‘AAA’ has the highest rating assigned by S&P
Global Ratings. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is extremely strong.
AA – An obligation rated ‘AA’ differs from the highest-rated obligations
only to a small degree. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is very strong.
A – An obligation rated ‘A’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse
effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher-rated categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is still strong.
BBB – An obligation rated ‘BBB’ exhibits adequate protection parameters.
However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
BB, B, CCC, CC, and C – Obligations rated ‘BB’, ‘B’, ‘CCC’, ‘CC’, and ‘C’
are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. ‘BB’ indicates the least degree of speculation and ‘C’ the highest. While such obligations will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these may be outweighed
by large uncertainties or major exposures to adverse conditions.
BB – An obligation rated ‘BB’ is less vulnerable to nonpayment than other
speculative issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions which could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
B – An obligation rated ‘B’ is more vulnerable to nonpayment than
obligations rated ‘BB’, but the obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. Adverse business, financial, or economic conditions will likely impair the obligor’s capacity or willingness to meet its
financial commitment on the obligation.
CCC – An obligation rated ‘CCC’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment, and
is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. In the event of adverse business, financial, or economic conditions, the obligor is not likely to
have the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
CC – An obligation rated ‘CC’ is currently highly vulnerable to
nonpayment. The ‘CC’ rating is used when a default has not yet occurred, but S&P Global Ratings expects default to be a virtual
certainty, regardless of the anticipated time to default.
C – An obligation rated ‘C’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment,
and the obligation is expected to have lower relative seniority or lower ultimate recovery compared to obligations that are rated higher.
D – An obligation rated ‘D’ is in default or in breach of an imputed
promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P Global Ratings believes that such payments will be made within five business days in
the absence of a stated grace period or within the earlier of the stated grace period or 30 calendar days. The ‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action and where default on an
obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. A rating on an obligationis lowered to ‘D’ if it is subject to a distressed debt restructuring.
*Ratings from ‘AA’ to ‘CCC’ may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the rating categories.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) -- Global Long-Term Rating Scale:
The following descriptions have been published by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
Aaa – Obligations rated Aaa are judged to be of the highest quality,
subject to the lowest level of credit risk.
Aa – Obligations rated Aa are judged to be of high quality and are subject
to very low credit risk.
A – Obligations rated A are judged to be upper-medium grade and are subject
to low credit risk.
Baa – Obligations rated Baa are judged to be medium-grade and subject to
moderate credit risk and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics.
Ba – Obligations rated Ba are judged to be speculative and are subject to
substantial credit risk.
B – Obligations rated B are considered speculative and are subject to high
credit risk.
Caa – Obligations rated Caa are judged to be speculative of poor standing
and are subject to very high credit risk.
Ca – Obligations rated Ca are highly speculative and
are likely in, or very near, default, with some prospect of recovery of principal and interest.
C – Obligations rated C are the lowest rated and are
typically in default, with little prospect for recovery of principal or interest.
Note: Moody’s appends numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 to
each generic rating classification
from Aa through Caa. The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range
ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of that generic rating category. Additionally, a “(hyb)” indicator is appended to all ratings of hybrid securities issued by banks, insurers, finance companies, and
securities firms.*
* By their terms, hybrid securities allow for the omission of scheduled dividends, interest, or principal payments, which can potentially result in impairment if such
an omission occurs. Hybrid securities may also be subject to contractually allowable write-downs of principal that could result in impairment. Together with the hybrid indicator, the long-term obligation rating assigned to a hybrid security
is an expression of the relative credit risk associated with that security.
Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”) -- Corporate Finance Obligations -- Long-Term Rating Scale:
The following descriptions have been published by Fitch, Inc. and Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries.
AAA – Highest credit quality. ‘AAA’ ratings denote the lowest expectation of credit risk. They are assigned only in cases of exceptionally strong capacity for payment of financial
commitments. This capacity is highly unlikely to be adversely affected by foreseeable events.
AA – Very high credit quality. ‘AA’ ratings denote expectations of very low credit risk. They indicate very strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is not
significantly vulnerable to foreseeable events.
A – High credit quality. ‘A’ ratings denote expectations of low credit risk. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered strong. This capacity may, nevertheless, be more vulnerable to
adverse business or economic conditions than is the case for higher ratings.
BBB – Good credit quality. ‘BBB’ ratings indicate that expectations of credit risk are currently low. The capacity for
payment of financial commitments is considered adequate but adverse business or economic conditions are more likely to impair this capacity.
BB – Speculative. ‘BB’ ratings indicate an elevated vulnerability to credit risk, particularly in the event of adverse changes in business or economic conditions over time; however, business or financial
alternatives may be available to allow financial commitments to be met.
B – Highly speculative. ‘B’ ratings indicate that material credit risk is present.
CCC – Substantial credit risk. ‘CCC’ ratings indicate that substantial credit risk is present.
CC – Very high levels of credit risk. ‘CC’ ratings indicate very high levels of credit risk.
C – Exceptionally high levels of credit risk. ‘C’ indicates exceptionally high levels of credit risk.
Ratings in the categories of ‘CCC’, ‘CC’ and ‘C’ relate to obligations that are in default. In this case, the rating does not opine on default risk, but reflects
recovery expectation only.
Note: The modifiers “+” or “-” may be appended to a rating
to denote relative status within major rating categories. Such suffixes are not added to the ‘AAA’ obligation rating category, or to corporate finance obligation ratings in the categories below ‘CCC’.
DBRS -- Long Term Obligations Rating Scale:
The following descriptions have been published by Dominion Bond Rating Service.
AAA – Highest credit quality. The capacity for the
payment of financial obligations is exceptionally high and unlikely to be adversely affected by future events.
AA – Superior credit quality. The capacity for the
payment of financial obligations is considered high. Credit quality differs from AAA only to a small degree. Unlikely to be significantly vulnerable to future events.
A – Good credit quality. The capacity for the payment
of financial obligations is substantial, but of lesser credit quality than AA. May be vulnerable to future events, but qualifying negative factors are considered manageable.
BBB – Adequate credit quality. The capacity for the
payment of financial obligations is considered acceptable. May be vulnerable to future events.
BB – Speculative, non investment-grade credit quality.
The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is uncertain. Vulnerable to future events.
B – Highly speculative credit quality. There is a high
level of uncertainty as to the capacity to meet financial obligations.
CCC, CC, C – Very highly speculative credit quality.
In danger of defaulting on financial obligations. There is little difference between these three categories, although CC and C ratings are normally applied to obligations that are seen as highly likely to default, or subordinated to
obligations rated in the CCC to B range. Obligations in respect of which default has not technically taken place but is considered inevitable may be rated in the C category.
D – When the issuer has filed under any applicable
bankruptcy, insolvency or winding up statute or there is a failure to satisfy an obligation after the exhaustion of grace periods, a downgrade to D may occur. DBRS Morningstar may also use SD (Selective Default) in cases where only some
securities are impacted, such as the case of a “distressed exchange.”
S&P Global Ratings -- Short-Term Issue Credit Ratings:
The following descriptions have been published by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC.
A-1 – A short-term obligation rated ‘A-1’ is rated in
the highest category by S&P Global Ratings. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is strong. Within this category, certain obligations are designated with a plus sign (+). This indicates that the
obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on these obligations is extremely strong.
A-2 - A short-term obligation rated ‘A-2’ is somewhat
more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher rating categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is satisfactory.
A-3 - A short-term obligation rated ‘A-3’ exhibits
adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
B - A short-term obligation rated ‘B’ is regarded as
vulnerable and has significant speculative characteristics. The obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments; however, it faces major ongoing uncertainties which could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to
meet its financial commitments.
C - A short-term obligation rated ‘C’ is currently
vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.
D - A short-term obligation rated ‘D’ is in default or
in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P Global Ratings believes that such payments will be made within
any stated grace period. However, any stated grace period longer than five business days will be treated as five business days. The ‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of a similar action and
where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. A rating on an obligation is lowered to ‘D’ if it is subject to a distressed debt restructuring.
Dual ratings may be assigned to debt issues that have a put
option or demand feature. The first component of the rating addresses the likelihood of repayment of principal and interest as due, and the second component of the rating addresses only the demand feature. The first component of the rating
can relate to either a short-term or long-term transaction and accordingly use either short-term or long-term rating symbols. The second component of the rating relates to the put option and is assigned a short-term rating symbol (for
example, ‘AAA/A-1+’ or ‘A-1+/A-1’). With U.S. municipal short-term demand debt, the U.S. municipal short-term note rating symbols are used for the first component of the rating (for example, ‘SP-1+/A-1+’).
Moody’s -- Global Short-Term Rating Scale:
The following descriptions have been published by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
P-1 - Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated
Prime-1 reflect a superior ability to repay short-term obligations.
P-2 - Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated
Prime-2 reflect a strong ability to repay short-term obligations.
P-3 - Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated
Prime-3 reflect an acceptable ability to repay short-term obligations.
NP - Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Not
Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.
Fitch -- Short-Term Ratings Assigned to Issuers or Obligations in Corporate, Public and Structured Finance:
The following descriptions have been published by Fitch Inc. and Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries.
F1 - Highest short-term credit quality. Indicates the
strongest intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments; may have an added “+” to denote any exceptionally strong credit feature.
F2 - Good short-term credit quality. Good intrinsic
capacity for timely payment of financial commitments.
F3 - Fair short-term credit quality. The intrinsic
capacity for timely payment of financial commitments is adequate.
B – Speculative short-term credit quality. Minimal
capacity for timely payment of financial commitments, plus heightened vulnerability to near term adverse changes in financial and economic conditions.
C - High short-term default risk. Default is a real
possibility.
RD – Restricted default. Indicates an entity that has
defaulted on one or more of its financial commitments, although it continues to meet other financial obligations. Typically applicable to entity ratings only.
D – Default. Indicates a broad-based default event
for an entity, or the default of a short-term obligation.
DBRS -- Commercial Paper and Short-Term Debt Rating Scale:
The following descriptions have been published by Dominion Bond Rating Service.
R-1 (high) – Highest credit quality. The capacity for
the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is exceptionally high. Unlikely to be adversely affected by future events.
R-1 (middle) – Superior credit quality. The capacity
for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is very high. Differs from R-1 (high) by a relatively modest degree. Unlikely to be significantly vulnerable to future events.
R-1 (low) – Good credit quality. The capacity for the
payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is substantial. Overall strength is not as favourable as higher rating categories. May be vulnerable to future events, but qualifying negative factors are considered manageable.
R-2 (high) – Upper end of adequate credit quality.
The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is acceptable. May be vulnerable to future events.
R-2 (middle) – Adequate credit quality. The capacity
for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is acceptable. May be vulnerable to future events or may be exposed to other factors that could reduce credit quality.
R-2 (low) – Lower end of adequate credit quality. The
capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is acceptable. May be vulnerable to future events. A number of challenges are present that could affect the issuer’s ability to meet such obligations.
R-3 – Lowest end of adequate credit quality. There is
capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due. May be vulnerable to future events and the certainty of meeting such obligations could be impacted by a variety of developments.
R-4 – Speculative credit quality. The capacity for
the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is uncertain.
R-5 – Highly speculative credit quality. There is a
high level of uncertainty as to the capacity to meet short-term financial obligations as they fall due.
D – When the issuer has filed under any applicable
bankruptcy, insolvency or winding up statute or there is a failure to satisfy an obligation after the exhaustion of grace periods, a downgrade to D may occur. DBRS Morningstar may also use SD (Selective Default) in cases where only some
securities are impacted, such as the case of a “distressed exchange.”