Form 10-Q

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

10-Q 1 d10q.htm FORM 10-Q Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-50398

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

MARYLAND

20-0188736

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

8 SOUND SHORE DRIVE, SUITE 255 GREENWICH, CONNECTICUT 06830

(Address of principal executive office)

(203) 983-5275

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. The number of shares of the issuer’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of November 4, 2010 was 26,989,408.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		4

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	4

	Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009	4

	Schedule of Investments as of September 30, 2010	5

	Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2009	9

	Statements of Operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009	11

	Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009	12

	Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009	13

	Notes to Financial Statements	14

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25

	Forward-Looking Statements	25

	Overview	25

	Critical Accounting Policies	28

	Portfolio Composition and Investment Activity	34

	Results of Operations	38

	Liquidity and Capital Resources	44

	Recent Developments	47

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	48

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	48

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		48

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	48

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	48

Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	59


Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	59

Item 4.	Reserved	59

Item 5.	Other Information	59

Item 6.	Exhibits	60

SIGNATURES		61

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

(unaudited)


	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
ASSETS
Investments, at fair value (cost: $245,890,044@ 9/30/10; $260,752,699 @ 12/31/09)
Non-affiliated/non-control investments (cost: $227,443,530 @ 9/30/10; $241,169,345 @ 12/31/09)	$	217,377,950		$	180,226,123
Control investments (cost: $18,446,514 @ 9/30/10; $19,583,354 @ 12/31/09)		19,575,000			20,025,000

Total investments at fair value		236,952,950			200,251,123

Cash and cash equivalents		13,138,904			23,972,885
Interest receivable		2,303,128			860,271
Prepaid expenses and other assets		106,743			256,012

Total assets	$	252,501,725		$	225,340,291


LIABILITIES
Investment advisory fee payable to affiliate	$	1,710,056		$	1,119,544
Accrued expenses		513,515			128,752

Total liabilities		2,223,571			1,248,296


NET ASSETS
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, and 26,989,408 and 26,813,216 issued and outstanding, respectively		269,894			268,132
Capital in excess of par value		321,653,729			320,175,874
Net unrealized depreciation on investments		(8,937,094	)		(60,501,576	)
Accumulated net realized losses on investments		(61,515,057	)		(32,412,374	)
Distributions in excess of investment income		(1,193,318	)		(3,438,061	)

Total net assets		250,278,154			224,091,995

Total liabilities and net assets	$	252,501,725		$	225,340,291


Net asset value per common share	$	9.27		$	8.36

See Accompanying Notes.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

(unaudited)


COMPANY⁽¹⁾	INDUSTRY	INVESTMENT	PRINCIPAL AMOUNT		COST		FAIR VALUE⁽²⁾

ACA CLO 2006-2, Limited	structured finance	CLO preferred equity		—	$	2,200,000	$	2,675,000

Airvana Network Solutions, Inc.	software	senior secured notes (4)(6)	$	10,155,556		9,974,804		10,041,306
		(11.00%, due August 27, 2014)

AKQA, Inc.	advertising	senior secured notes(4)(6)		8,390,502		8,390,502		8,247,863
		(4.79%, due March 20, 2013)

Algorithmic Implementations, Inc.	software	senior secured notes(4)(5)(6)		15,675,000		15,446,514		15,675,000
(d/b/a “Ai Squared”)		(9.84%, due September 11, 2013)
		common stock		—		3,000,000		3,900,000

Allen Systems Group, Inc.	software	second lien senior secured notes(3)(4)(5)		3,566,828		3,447,969		3,531,160
		(13.00%, due April 19, 2014)

American Integration Technologies, LLC	semiconductor capital	senior secured notes(4)(5)		25,401,906		21,493,858		22,607,696
	equipment	(11.75%, due December 31, 2013)

Avenue CLO V LTD 2007-5A D1	structured finance	CLO secured notes(4)(5)		3,659,805		1,678,973		1,646,912
		(3.95%, due April 25, 2019)

Band Digital Inc.	IT consulting	senior secured notes(4)(6)		2,625,000		2,625,000		2,625,000
(f/k/a “WHITTMANHART, Inc.”)		(15.58%, due December 31, 2011)
		warrants to purchase common stock(7)		—		0		0

Birch Communications, Inc.	telecommunication services	senior secured notes(4)		4,090,909		4,090,909		4,090,909
		(15.00%, due June 21, 2015)

Canaras CLO - 2007-1A E	structured finance	CLO secured notes(4)(5)		3,500,000		1,785,493		1,820,000
		(4.64%, due June 19, 2021)

Cavtel Holdings, LLC	telecommunication services	first lien senior secured notes(3)(4)(5)(6)		6,040,396		4,402,831		6,055,497
		(9.50%, due December 31, 2012)

CIFC CLO - 2006-1A B2L	structured finance	CLO secured notes(4)(5)		3,247,284		1,573,967		1,623,642
		(4.52%, due October 20, 2020)

Del Mar CLO I Ltd. 2006-1	structured finance	CLO secured notes(4)(5)(6)		1,831,690		918,941		1,025,746
		(4.47, due July 25, 2018)

Drew Marine Partners, L.P.	shipping & transportation	first lien senior secured notes(4)(5)(6)		4,718,750		4,611,532		4,671,563
		(9.50%, due August 31, 2014)

Fairway Group Acquisition Company	grocery	first lien senior secured notes(4)(5)		4,962,500		4,837,376		4,939,772
		(12.00%, due October 1, 2014)

Flagship 2005-4A D	structured finance	CLO secured notes(4)(5)		2,612,988		1,513,808		1,476,338
		(5.05%, due June 1, 2017)

Fusionstorm, Inc.	IT value-added reseller	subordinated notes(4)(5)(6)		2,200,000		2,173,357		2,126,025
		(11.74%, due October 2, 2011)
		warrants to purchase common stock(7)		—		725,000		150,000

GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc.	interactive voice messaging	senior secured notes(4)(5)(7)		3,476,000		3,042,025		2,000,000
	services	(0.0%, due October 30, 2014)
		convertible preferred stock(7)		—		1,500,000		0

See Accompanying Notes.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

(unaudited)


COMPANY⁽¹⁾	INDUSTRY	INVESTMENT	PRINCIPAL AMOUNT		COST		FAIR VALUE⁽²⁾

GXS Worldwide Inc.	software	senior secured notes(5)		8,000,000		7,880,342		7,920,000
		(9.75%, due June 15, 2015)

Harch CLO II LTD 2005-2a e	structured finance	CDO secured notes(4)(5)		4,819,262		2,337,866		2,409,631
		(5.51%, due October 22, 2017)

Hewetts Island CDO 2007 - 1RA E	structured finance	CDO secured notes(4)(5)(6)		3,201,735		1,850,634		1,985,076
		(7.15%, due November 12, 2019)

Hewetts Island CDO III 2005-1A D	structured finance	CDO secured notes(4)(5)		6,641,328		3,445,142		3,785,557
		(6.17%, due August 9, 2017)

Hewetts Island CDO IV 2006-4X E BB	structured finance	CDO secured notes(4)(5)		3,251,816		1,463,621		1,695,172
		(4.97%, due May 9, 2018)

HHI Holdings LLC	auto parts manufacturer	senior secured notes(4)(5)		2,925,000		2,841,973		2,939,625
		(10.50%, due March 30, 2015)

Hudson Straits CLO 2004-1A E	structured finance	CLO secured notes(4)(5)		2,244,290		1,261,559		1,391,460
		(7.28%, due October 15, 2016)

Hyland Software, Inc.	enterprise software	second lien senior secured notes(4)(5)		11,000,000		10,946,616		10,989,000
		(6.88%, due June 30, 2014)

Integra Telecomm, Inc.	telecommunication services	common stock(7)		—		1,712,397		1,959,011

Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation	retail food products	first lien senior secured notes(4)(5)(6)		4,063,526		3,811,422		4,022,890
		(10.75%, due February 16, 2014)

Landmark V CDO LTD	structured finance	CDO senior secured notes(4)(5)(6)		3,722,086		2,119,622		2,521,341
		(5.55%, due June 1, 2017)

Latitude II CLO 2006 2A D	structured finance	CLO senior secured notes(4)(5)(6)		2,828,018		1,452,983		1,496,022
		(4.04%, due December 15, 2018)

Latitude III CLO 2007-3A	structured finance	CLO secured notes(4)(5)		4,000,000		1,810,670		1,840,000
		(4.28%, due April 11, 2021)

Liberty CDO LTD 2005-1A C	structured finance	CLO secured notes(4)(5)(6)		2,706,177		1,446,161		1,434,274
		(2.37%, due November 1, 2017)

Lightpoint CLO 2007-8a	structured finance	CLO secured notes(4)(5)		5,000,000		2,703,321		3,050,000
		(7.03%, due July 25, 2018)

Loomis Sayles CLO 2006-1AE	structured finance	CLO secured notes(4)(5)		3,322,992		1,798,239		1,860,876
		(4.35%, due October 26, 2020)

Ocean Trails CLO II 2007-2a-d	structured finance	CLO subordinated secured notes(4)(5)		3,649,700		1,949,818		1,952,590
		(5.03%, due June 27, 2022)

Pegasus Solutions, Inc.	enterprise software	first lien senior secured notes(4)(5)(6)		2,975,230		2,724,700		2,838,369
		(7.75%, due April 17, 2013)
		second lien senior secured notes(3)(5)(6)		4,967,789		2,742,888		4,525,656
		(13.00%, due April 15, 2014)
		common equity(7)		—		62,595		154,710
		preferred equity(7)		—		657,247		1,451,174

See Accompanying Notes.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

(unaudited)


COMPANY⁽¹⁾	INDUSTRY	INVESTMENT	PRINCIPAL AMOUNT		COST		FAIR VALUE⁽²⁾

Power Tools, Inc.	software	senior secured notes(4)(5)(6)		9,250,000		9,152,642		7,862,500
		(12.00%, due May 16, 2014)
		warrants to purchase common stock(7)		—		350,000		270,000

Prodigy Health Group	healthcare	second lien senior secured notes(4)(5)		3,466,667		2,405,898		3,328,000
		(8.26%, due November 29, 2013)

Prospero CLO II BV	structured finance	CLO senior secured notes(4)(5)		9,900,000		4,146,575		4,356,000
		(4.47%, due October 20, 2022)

QA Direct Holdings, LLC	printing and publishing	first lien senior secured notes(4)(5)(6)		5,505,392		5,141,676		5,156,736
		(8.25%, due August 10, 2014)

Sargas CLO 2006 -1A	structured finance	CLO subordinated notes		—		4,945,500		4,040,000

SCS Holdings II, Inc.	IT value-added reseller	second lien senior secured notes(4)		7,500,000		7,508,204		6,750,000
		(6.29%, due May 30, 2013)

Shearer’s Food Inc.	food products manufacturer	subordinated notes(3)(4)(5)		4,040,410		3,945,765		4,080,813
		(15.00%, due March 31, 2016)

Shield Finance Co.	software	first lien term notes(4)(5)(6)		5,955,000		5,720,300		5,761,463
		(7.75%, due June 15, 2016)

SonicWall, Inc.	software	first lien senior secured notes(4)(5)		2,000,000		1,941,583		2,000,000
		(8.25%, due January 23, 2016)
		second lien senior secured notes(4)(5)		5,000,000		4,852,834		4,900,000
		(12.00%, due January 23, 2017)

Stratus Technologies, Inc.	computer hardware	first lien high yield notes(5)		10,000,000		9,139,894		9,930,000
		(12.00%, due March 29, 2015)
		common equity(7)		—		377,928		0
		preferred equity(7)		—		186,622		431,480

U.S. Telepacific Corp.	telecommunication services	senior secured notes(4)(5)		3,980,000		3,955,040		3,984,975
		(9.25%, due August 4, 2011)

Vision Solutions, Inc	software	senior secured notes(4)(5)		6,000,000		5,765,559		5,880,000
		(7.75%, due July 23, 2016)

WAICCS Las Vegas, LLC	real estate development	second lien senior secured notes(4)(7)(10)(11)		15,000,000		15,000,000		0
		(9.31%, due July 31, 2009)

Workflow Management, Inc.	printing & document	first lien senior secured notes(3)(4)(5)(6)(12)		5,632,355		4,901,349		5,069,120
	management	(8.00%, due November 30, 2011)

Total Investments					$	245,890,044	$	236,952,950

See Accompanying Notes.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

(unaudited)

(1)

Other than Algorithmic Implementation, Inc. (d/b/a Ai Squared), which TICC may be deemed to control, TICC does not “control” and is not an “affiliate” of any of its portfolio companies, each as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). In general, under the 1940 Act, TICC would be presumed to “control” a portfolio company if TICC owned 25% or more of its voting securities and would be an “affiliate” of a portfolio company if TICC owned 5% or more of its voting securities.

(2)	Fair value is determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Company.

(3)	Investment includes payment-in-kind interest.

(4)	Notes bear interest at variable rates.

(5)	Cost value reflects accretion of original issue discount or market discount.

(6)	Cost value reflects repayment of principal.

(7)	Non-income producing at the relevant period end.

(8)	As a percentage of net assets at September 30, 2010, investments at fair value are categorized as follows: senior secured notes (71.3%), subordinated notes (2.5%), CLO debt (14.9%), CLO equity (2.7%), common stock (2.4%), preferred stock (0.8%) and warrants to purchase equity securities (0.2%).

(9)	Aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for federal income tax purposes is 12,970,424; aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for federal income tax purposes is $21,800,188. Net unrealized depreciation is $8,829,764 based upon a tax cost basis of $245,782,714.

(10)	Debt investment on non-accrual status at the relevant period end.

(11)

In 2009, the maturity date on our investment in WAICCS Las Vegas, LLC (“WAICCS”) became July 31, 2009 as a result of the failure of WAICCS’ equity sponsor to pre-fund interest reserves as required to extend the maturity beyond July 31, 2009. During July 2009, this investment was placed on non-accrual status and, as of September 30, 2010, the maturity date has not been revised as the interest reserves have not yet been pre-funded.

(12)	Workflow Management, Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on September 29, 2010.

See Accompanying Notes.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009


COMPANY⁽¹⁾	INDUSTRY	INVESTMENT	PRINCIPAL AMOUNT		COST		FAIR VALUE⁽²⁾⁽⁸⁾

ACA CLO 2006-2, Limited	structured finance	CLO preferred equity		—	$	2,200,000	$	2,200,000

AKQA, Inc.	advertising	senior secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁶⁾	$	8,491,848		8,491,848		8,143,682
		(4.75%, due March 20, 2013)

Algorithmic Implementations, Inc. (d/b/a “Ai Squared”)	software	senior secured notes^(4)(5)(6)		17,025,000		16,583,354		17,025,000
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc. (d/b/a “Ai Squared”)		(9.84%, due September 11, 2013)
		common stock		—		3,000,000		3,000,000

Allen Systems Group, Inc.	software	second lien senior secured notes^(3)(4)(5)		3,514,000		3,361,190		3,393,927
		(13.00%, due April 19, 2014)

American Integration Technologies, LLC	semiconductor capital equipment	senior secured notes^{(4)(6)(7)(10)}		20,950,000		20,950,000		8,380,000
	semiconductor capital equipment	(13.75%, due April 29, 2011)

Attachmate Corporation	enterprise software	second lien senior secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾		2,000,000		1,396,221		1,615,000
		(7.00%, due October 13, 2013)

Box Services, LLC	digital imaging	senior secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁶⁾		11,915,170		11,915,170		4,106,563
		(9.50%, due April 30, 2012)

Cavtel Holdings, LLC	telecommunication services	first lien senior secured notes^(3)(4)(5)(6)		6,438,805		4,208,627		6,390,515
		(10.50%, due December 31, 2012)

Del Mar CLO I Ltd. 2006-1	structured finance	CLO secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾		1,876,262		903,895		891,224
		(4.28%, due July 25, 2018)

Drew Marine Partners, L.P.	shipping & transportation	first lien senior secured notes^(4)(5)(6)		4,906,250		4,769,087		4,832,656
		(9.50%, due August 31, 2014)

Fairway Group Acquisition Company	grocery	first lien senior secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾		5,000,000		4,851,296		4,900,000
		(12.00%, due October 1, 2014)

First Data Corporation	business services	first lien senior secured notes^(4)(5)(6)		4,961,929		3,725,801		4,398,899
		(3.00%, due September 24, 2014)

Fusionstorm, Inc.	IT value-added reseller	senior subordinated unsecured notes^(4)(5)(6)		3,550,000		3,483,268		2,680,250
		(11.74%, due October 2, 2011)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁷⁾				725,000		250,000

GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc.	interactive voice messaging services	senior secured notes^(4)(5)(7)		3,476,000		2,906,779		2,000,000
	interactive voice messaging services	(0.0%, due October 30, 2014)
		convertible preferred stock⁽⁷⁾		—		1,500,000		0

Group 329, LLC (d/b/a “The CAPS Group”)	digital imaging	senior secured term A notes^{(4)(5)(7)(10)}		5,467,804		5,406,561		0
		(11.89%, due February 28, 2012)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁷⁾		—		110,000		0
		senior secured term B notes^{(4)(5)(7)(10)}		17,485,000		17,250,655		0
		(12.39%, due February 28, 2013)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁷⁾		—		90,000		0

GXS Worldwide Inc.	software	senior secured notes⁽⁵⁾		8,000,000		7,865,888		7,870,000
		(9.75%, due June 15, 2015)

Hyland Software, Inc.	enterprise software	second lien senior secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾		11,000,000		10,936,317		10,461,000
		(6.77%, due July 31, 2014)

Integra Telecomm, Inc.	telecommunications services	common stock⁽⁷⁾		—		1,712,397		2,454,450

Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation	retail food products	first lien senior secured notes^(4)(5)(6)		4,980,973		4,534,476		4,738,151
		(10.75%, due February 16, 2014)

Lightpoint CLO 2007-8a	structured finance	CLO secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾		5,000,000		2,621,122		2,575,000
		(6.78%, due July 25, 2018)

NetQuote, Inc.	web-based services	senior secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁶⁾		21,000,000		21,000,000		20,790,000
		(9.50%, due May 1, 2011)

Ocean Trails CLO II 2007-2a-d	structured finance	CLO subordinated secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾		2,838,656		1,490,894		1,447,714
		(4.78%, due June 27, 2022)


COMPANY⁽¹⁾	INDUSTRY	INVESTMENT	PRINCIPAL AMOUNT		COST		FAIR VALUE⁽²⁾⁽⁸⁾

Palm, Inc.	consumer electronics	first lien senior secured notes^(4)(5)(6)		14,575,446		13,609,015		12,462,006
		(3.76%, due April 24, 2014)

Power Tools, Inc.	software	senior secured notes^(4)(5)(6)		10,000,000		9,872,792		7,825,000
		(12.00%, due May 16, 2014)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁷⁾		—		350,000		220,000

Prodigy Health Group	healthcare	second lien senior secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾		4,000,000		2,546,288		3,386,000
		(8.24%, due November 29, 2013)

Punch Software LLC	software	senior secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁷⁾		2,100,000		1,595,643		1,625,400
		(0.00%, due October 31, 2012)

QA Direct Holdings, LLC	printing and publishing	first lien senior secured notes^(4)(5)(6)		3,632,149		3,342,189		3,232,613
		(8.00%, due August 10, 2014)

Questia Media, Inc.	digital media	senior secured notes⁽³⁾		14,358,128		14,358,128		13,767,127
		(11.00%, due Jan. 29, 2010)

SCS Holdings II, Inc.	IT value-added reseller	second lien senior secured notes⁽⁴⁾		14,500,000		14,510,534		11,890,000
		(6.25%, due May 30, 2013)

Springboard Finance (d/b/a “Skype”)	telecommunication services	first lien senior secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾		2,000,000		1,950,873		2,080,000
		(9.00%, due November 19, 2014)

Stratus Technologies, Inc.	computer hardware	first lien senior secured notes^(4)(5)(6)		4,721,536		3,767,988		4,459,491
		(4.01%, due March 29, 2011)

WAICCS Las Vegas, LLC	real estate development	second lien senior secured notes^{(4)(7)(9)(10)}		15,000,000		15,000,000		1,500,000
		(9.31%, due July 31, 2009)

WHITTMANHART, Inc.	IT consulting	senior secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁶⁾		3,125,000		3,125,000		3,125,000
		(13.58%, due December 31, 2010)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁷⁾		—		0		0

Workflow Management, Inc.	printing & document management	first lien senior secured notes^(3)(4)(5)(6)		6,626,109		5,263,940		6,311,369
	printing & document management	(9.50%, due November 30, 2011)

X-Rite Incorporated	software	first lien senior secured notes^(4)(5)(6)		3,994,865		3,470,463		3,823,086
		(7.47%, due October 24, 2012)


Total Investments					$	260,752,699	$	200,251,123

⁽¹⁾

⁽²⁾	Fair value is determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Company.

⁽³⁾	Investment includes payment-in-kind interest.

⁽⁴⁾	Notes bear interest at variable rates.

⁽⁵⁾	Cost value reflects accretion of original issue discount or market discount.

⁽⁶⁾	Cost value reflects repayment of principal.

⁽⁷⁾	Non-income producing at the relevant period end.

⁽⁸⁾

As a percentage of net assets at December 31, 2009, investments at fair value are categorized as follows: senior secured notes (82.38%), CLO subordinated secured notes (2.2%), senior subordinated unsecured notes (1.2%), CLO preference shares (1.0%), common stock (2.4%), and warrants to purchase equity securities (0.2%).

⁽⁹⁾

In 2009, the maturity date on our investment in WAICCS Las Vegas, LLC (“WAICCS”) became July 31, 2009 as a result of the failure of WAICCS’ equity sponsor to pre-fund interest reserves as required to extend the maturity beyond July 31, 2009. During July 2009, this investment was placed on non-accrual status and, as of December 31, 2009, the maturity date has not been revised as the interest reserves have not yet been pre-funded.

⁽¹⁰⁾	Debt investment on non-accrual status at the relevant period end.

⁽¹¹⁾	Aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for federal income tax purposes is $7,807,742; aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for federal income tax purposes is $68,201,988. Net unrealized depreciation is $60,394,246 based upon a tax cost basis of $260,645,369.

See Accompanying Notes.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2010		Three Months Ended September 30, 2009			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
INVESTMENT INCOME
From non-affiliated/non-control investments:
Interest income - debt investments	$	7,593,456	$	4,272,498		$	19,687,039		$	12,991,256
Distributions from securitization vehicles - equity investments		959,268		—			2,669,755			—
Commitment and amendment fee income		102,365		6,256			562,879			62,549
Other income		328		66,074			17,118			71,810

Total investment income from non-affiliated/non-control investments		8,655,417		4,344,828			22,936,791			13,125,615

From control investments:
Interest income - debt investments		425,701		604,114			1,430,970			1,866,834

Total investment income from control investments		425,701		604,114			1,430,970			1,866,834

Total investment income		9,081,118		4,948,942			24,367,761			14,992,449

EXPENSES
Compensation expense		244,039		225,953			723,235			677,858
Investment advisory fees		1,710,056		1,077,425			4,686,674			3,002,460
Professional fees		336,506		322,966			787,854			893,183
General and administrative		187,356		144,535			603,173			479,855

Total expenses		2,477,957		1,770,879			6,800,936			5,053,356

Net investment income		6,603,161		3,178,063			17,566,825			9,939,093

Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments		4,972,601		22,308,201			51,564,482			27,118,554

Net realized gains (losses) on investments		867,060		(10,462,294	)		(29,102,683	)		(13,777,450	)

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations	$	12,442,822	$	15,023,970		$	40,028,624		$	23,280,197


Net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per common share:
Basic and diluted	$	0.25	$	0.12		$	0.65		$	0.37
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share:
Basic and diluted	$	0.46	$	0.56		$	1.49		$	0.88
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding:
Basic and diluted		26,932,960		26,674,521			26,874,575			26,582,410

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

(unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010			Year Ended December 31, 2009
Increase (decrease) in net assets from operations:
Net investment income	$	17,566,825		$	13,491,984
Net realized losses on investments		(29,102,683	)		(10,513,051	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments		51,564,482			32,203,525

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations		40,028,624			35,182,458

Dividends from net investment income		(15,322,082	)		(15,973,470	)

Distributions to shareholders		(15,322,082	)		(15,973,470	)

Capital share transactions:
Reinvestment of dividends		1,479,617			1,516,257

Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions		1,479,617			1,516,257

Total increase in net assets		26,186,159			20,725,245
Net assets at beginning of period		224,091,995			203,366,750

Net assets at end of period (including over distributed net investment income of ($1,193,318) and ($3,438,061), respectively)	$	250,278,154		$	224,091,995

Capital share activity:
Shares issued from reinvestment of dividends		176,192			329,670

Net increase in capital share activity		176,192			329,670

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations	$	40,028,624		$	23,280,197
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
Purchases of investments		(99,026,012	)		(34,426,089	)
Repayments of principal and reductions to investment cost value		42,038,804			44,097,249
Proceeds from the sale of investments		47,311,196			8,010,037
Increase in investments due to PIK		(356,562	)		(80,252	)
Net realized losses on investments		29,102,683			13,777,450
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments		(51,564,482	)		(27,118,554	)
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable		(1,442,857	)		235,541
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets		149,269			7,892
Amortization of discounts		(4,207,454	)		(1,567,131	)
Increase (decrease) in investment advisory fee payable		590,512			(210,027	)
Increase in accrued expenses		384,763			140,161

Net cash provided by operating activities		3,008,484			26,146,474

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Distributions paid (net of stock issued under dividend reinvestment plan of $1,479,617 and $1,119,038, respectively)		(13,842,465	)		(10,842,298	)

Net cash used by financing activities		(13,842,465	)		(10,842,298	)


Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(10,833,981	)		15,304,176

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		23,972,885			14,069,251


Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	13,138,904		$	29,373,427


NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Value of shares issued in connection with dividend reinvestment plan	$	1,479,617		$	1,119,038

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

NOTE 1. UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Interim financial statements of TICC Capital Corp. (“TICC” or “Company”) are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain disclosures accompanying annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP are omitted. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring accruals, necessary for the fair presentation of financial statements for the interim periods have been included. The current period’s results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results that may be achieved for the year. The interim financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

NOTE 2. ORGANIZATION

TICC was incorporated under the General Corporation Laws of the State of Maryland on July 21, 2003 as a closed-end management investment company. The Company has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). In addition, the Company has elected to be treated for tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Company’s investment objective is to maximize its total return.

TICC’s investment activities are managed by TICC Management, LLC (“TICC Management”), a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. BDC Partners, LLC (“BDC Partners”) is the managing member of TICC Management and serves as the administrator of TICC.

NOTE 3. INVESTMENT VALUATION

The most significant estimate inherent in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements is the valuation of investments and the related amounts of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments recorded. There is no single method for determining fair value in good faith. As a result, determining fair value requires that judgment be applied to the specific facts and circumstances of each portfolio investment while employing a consistently applied valuation process for the types of investments TICC makes. The Company is required to specifically fair value each individual investment on a quarterly basis.

The Company adopted ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, which establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements, on January 1, 2008. ASC 820-10 clarified the definition of fair value and requires companies to expand their disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities in interim and annual periods subsequent to initial recognition. ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820-10 also establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, which includes inputs such as quoted prices for similar securities in active markets and quoted prices for identical securities in markets that are not active; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. The Company has determined that due to the general illiquidity of the market for the Company’s investment portfolio, whereby little or no market data exists, all of the Company’s investments are based upon “Level 3” inputs as of September 30, 2010.

The Company’s Board of Directors determines the value of TICC’s investment portfolio each quarter. In connection with that determination, members of TICC Management’s portfolio management team prepare portfolio company valuations using the most recent portfolio company financial statements and forecasts. Since March 2004, the Company has engaged third-party valuation firms to provide assistance in valuing its bilateral investments and, more recently, for certain of its syndicated loans, although the Board of Directors ultimately determines the appropriate valuation of each such investment.

The Company’s process for determining the fair value of a bilateral investment begins with determining the enterprise value of the portfolio company. Enterprise value means the entire value of the company to a potential buyer, including the sum of the values of debt and equity securities used to capitalize the enterprise at a point in time. The fair value of the Company’s investment is based, in part, on the enterprise value at which the portfolio company could be sold in an orderly disposition over a reasonable period of time between willing parties other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The liquidity event whereby the Company exits a private investment is generally the sale, the recapitalization or, in some cases, the initial public offering of the portfolio company.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

There is no one methodology to determine enterprise value and, in fact, for any one portfolio company, enterprise value is best expressed as a range of fair values, from which TICC derives a single estimate of enterprise value. To determine the enterprise value of a portfolio company, TICC analyzes the historical and projected financial results, as well as the nature and value of any collateral. The Company also uses industry valuation benchmarks and public market comparables. The Company also considers other events, including private mergers and acquisitions, a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent debt or equity sale or restructuring, and includes these events in the enterprise valuation process. The Company generally requires portfolio companies to provide annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements, as well as annual projections for the upcoming fiscal year.

Typically, the Company’s bilateral debt investments are valued on the basis of a fair value determination arrived at through an analysis of the borrower’s financial and operating condition or other factors, as well as consideration of the entity’s enterprise value. The types of factors that the Company may take into account in valuing its investments include: market trading and transaction comparables, applicable market yields and multiples, security covenants, call protection provisions, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings and discounted cash flows, among other factors. The fair value of equity interests in portfolio companies is determined based on various factors, including the enterprise value remaining for equity holders after the repayment of the portfolio company’s debt and other preference capital, and other pertinent factors such as recent offers to purchase a portfolio company, recent transactions involving the purchase or sale of the portfolio company’s equity securities, or other liquidity events. The determined equity values are generally discounted when the Company has a minority position, when there are restrictions on resale, specific concerns about the receptivity of the capital markets to a specific company at a certain time, or other factors.

The Company will record unrealized depreciation on bilateral investments when it believes that an investment has become impaired, including where collection of a loan or realization of an equity security is doubtful. The Company will record unrealized appreciation if it believes that the underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and the Company’s equity security has also appreciated in value. Changes in fair value are recorded in the statement of operations as net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation.

Under the valuation procedures approved by the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Valuation Committee, a third-party valuation firm will prepare valuations for each of the Company’s bilateral investments for which market quotations are not readily available that, when combined with all other investments in the same portfolio company, (i) have a value as of the previous quarter of greater than or equal to 2.5% of TICC’s total assets as of the previous quarter, and (ii) have a value as of the current quarter of greater than or equal to 2.5% of TICC’s total assets as of the previous quarter, after taking into account any repayment of principal during the current quarter. In addition, the frequency of those third-party valuations of TICC’s portfolio securities is based upon the grade assigned to each such security under TICC’s credit grading system as follows: Grade 1, at least annually; Grade 2, at least semi-annually; Grades 3, 4, and 5, at least quarterly. TICC Management also retains the authority to seek, on the Company’s behalf, additional third party valuations with respect to both the Company’s bilateral portfolio securities and the Company’s syndicated loan investments. The Board of Directors retains ultimate authority as to the third-party review cycle as well as the appropriate valuation of each investment.

Given the continued economic downturn, the market for syndicated loans has become increasingly illiquid with limited or no transactions for many of those securities which the Company holds. On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued additional guidelines under ASC 820-10-35, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly,” which provides guidance on factors that should be considered in determining when a previously active market becomes inactive and whether a transaction is orderly. In accordance with ASC 820-10-35, the Company’s valuation procedures specifically provide for the review of indicative quotes supplied by the large agent banks that make a market for each security. However, the marketplace for which the Company obtains indicative bid quotes for purposes of determining the fair value of its syndicated loan investments have shown these attributes of illiquidity as described by ASC-820-10-35. Due to the market illiquidity and the lack of transactions since 2008, the Company has determined that the current agent bank non-binding indicative bids for the substantial majority of its syndicated investments may not be considered reliable, and alternative valuation procedures would need to be performed until liquidity returns to the marketplace. As such, the Company has engaged third-party valuation firms to provide assistance in valuing certain of its syndicated investments. In addition, TICC Management prepares an analysis of each syndicated loan, including a financial summary, covenant compliance review, recent trading activity in the security, if known, and other business developments related to the portfolio company. All available information, including non-binding indicative bids which may not be considered reliable, is presented to the Valuation Committee to consider in its determination of fair value. In some instances, there may be limited trading activity in a security even though the market for the security is considered not active. In such cases the Valuation Committee will consider the number of trades, the size and timing of each trade, and other circumstances around such trades, to the extent such information is available, in its determination of fair value. The Valuation Committee will evaluate the impact of such additional information, and factor it into its consideration of the fair value that is indicated by the analysis provided by third-party valuation firms. The Company has considered the factors described in ASC 820-10 and has determined that it is properly valuing the securities in its portfolio.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

During the past several quarters, the Company has acquired a number of debt and equity positions in collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) investment vehicles. These investments are special purpose financing vehicles. In valuing such investments, the Company considers the operating metrics of the specific investment vehicle, including compliance with collateralization tests, defaulted and restructured securities, and payment defaults, if any. In addition, the Company considers the indicative prices provided by the broker who arranges transactions in such investment vehicles, as well as any available information on other relevant transactions in the market. TICC Management or the Valuation Committee may request an additional analysis by a third-party firm to assist in the valuation process of CLO investment vehicles. All information is presented to the Board of Directors for its determination of fair value of these investments.

The Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to the disclosure requirements of ASC 820-10-35 at September 30, 2010, were as follows:


($ in millions)	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using						Total
Assets	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Cash and cash equivalents	$	13.1	$	0.0	$	0.0	$	13.1
Senior Secured Notes		0.0		0.0		178.4		178.4
CLO Debt		0.0		0.0		37.4		37.4
CLO Equity		0.0		0.0		6.7		6.7
Common Stock		0.0		0.0		6.0		6.0
Subordinated Notes		0.0		0.0		6.2		6.2
Preferred Stock		0.0		0.0		1.9		1.9
Warrants to purchase equity		0.0		0.0		0.4		0.4

Total	$	13.1	$	0.0	$	237.0	$	250.1

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

A reconciliation of the fair value of investments for three months ending September 30, 2010, utilizing significant unobservable inputs, is as follows:


($ in millions)	Senior Secured Note Investments			Collateralized Loan Obligation Debt Investments			Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investments		Common Stock Investments		Subordinated Note Investments			Preferred Share Equity Investments		Warrants to Purchase Common Stock Investments		Total
Balance at June 30, 2010	$	184.5		$	22.9		$	6.5	$	6.0	$	6.5		$	1.9	$	0.4	$	228.7
Realized gains included in earnings		0.5			0.0			0.0		0.0		0.0			0.0		0.0		0.5
Unrealized appreciation included in earnings		3.3			1.7			0.2		0.0		0.1			0.0		0.0		5.3
Accretion of discount		1.1			0.3			0.0		0.0		0.0			0.0		0.0		1.4
Purchases		32.0			12.7			0.0		0.0		0.0			0.0		0.0		44.7
Repayments and Sales⁽¹⁾		(43.0	)		(0.2	)		0.0		0.0		(0.4	)		0.0		0.0		(43.6	)
Transfers in and/or out of level 3		0.0			0.0			0.0		0.0		0.0			0.0		0.0		0.0

Balance at September 30, 2010	$	178.4		$	37.4		$	6.7	$	6.0	$	6.2		$	1.9	$	0.4	$	237.0

The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to our Level 3 assets still held at the reporting date and reported within the net change in unrealized gains or losses on investments in our Statement of Operations	$	3.6		$	1.7		$	0.2	$	0.0	$	0.1		$	0.0	$	0.0	$	5.6

(1)	Includes PIK interest of approximately $71,000 and rounding adjustments to reconcile period end balances.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

A reconciliation of the fair value of investments for nine months ending September 30, 2010, utilizing significant unobservable inputs, is as follows:


($ in millions)	Senior Secured Note Investments			Collateralized Loan Obligation Debt Investments			Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investments			Common Stock Investments		Subordinated Note Investments			Preferred Share Equity Investments		Warrants to Purchase Common Stock Investments			Total
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	180.1		$	4.9		$	2.2		$	5.5	$	2.7		$	0.0	$	0.5		$	195.9
Realized Losses included in earnings		(29.4	)		0.0			0.0			0.0		0.0			0.0		0.0			(29.4	)
Unrealized appreciation included in earnings		48.4			2.3			(0.4	)		0.1		0.8			1.1		(0.1	)		52.2
Accretion of discount		3.6			0.6			0.0			0.0		0.0			0.0		0.0			4.2
Purchases⁽¹⁾		57.3			31.5			4.9			0.4		3.9			0.8		0.0			98.8
Repayments and Sales⁽²⁾		(81.6	)		(1.9	)		0.0			0.0		(1.2	)		0.0		0.0			(84.7	)
Transfers in and/or out of level 3		0.0			0.0			0.0			0.0		0.0			0.0		0.0			0.0

Balance at September 30, 2010	$	178.4		$	37.4		$	6.7		$	6.0	$	6.2		$	1.9	$	0.4		$	237.0

The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to our Level 3 assets still held at the reporting date and reported within the net change in unrealized gains or losses on investments in our Statement of Operations	$	16.5		$	2.3		$	(0.4	)	$	0.1	$	0.8		$	1.1	$	(0.1	)	$	20.3

(1)	Purchases include rounding adjustments to reconcile period end balances.

(2)	Includes PIK interest of approximately $357,000.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

The Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to the disclosure requirements of ASC 820-10-35 at December 31, 2009, were as follows:


($ in millions)	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Assets	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Cash equivalents	$	23.8	$	0.0	$	0.0	$	23.8
Bilateral investments		0.0		0.0		84.8		84.8
Syndicated investments		0.0		4.4		104.0		108.4
Collateralized loan obligation investments		0.0		0.0		7.1		7.1

Total	$	23.8	$	4.4	$	195.9	$	224.1

The following table shows the fair value of TICC’s portfolio of investments by asset class as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:


	September 30, 2010					December 31, 2009
	Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
	(dollars in millions)					(dollars in millions)
Senior Secured Notes	$	178.4		75.3	%	$	184.6		92.1	%
CLO Debt		37.4		15.8	%		4.9		2.5	%
CLO Equity		6.7		2.8	%		2.2		1.1	%
Subordinated Notes		6.2		2.6	%		2.7		1.4	%
Common Stock		6.0		2.5	%		5.4		2.7	%
Preferred Stock		1.9		0.8	%		0.0		0.0	%
Warrants		0.4		0.2	%		0.5		0.2	%

Total	$	237.0		100.0	%	$	200.3		100.0	%

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

NOTE 4. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net increase in net assets resulting from operations per share for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively:


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2010		Three Months Ended September 30, 2009		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)

Numerator for basic and diluted income per share–net increase in net assets resulting from investment income	$	6,603,161	$	3,178,063	$	17,566,825	$	9,939,093

Numerator for basic and diluted income per share–net increase in net assets resulting from operations	$	12,442,822	$	15,023,970	$	40,028,624	$	23,280,197

Denominator for basic and diluted income per share–weighted average shares		26,932,960		26,674,521		26,874,575		26,582,410

Basic and diluted net investment income per common share	$	0.25	$	0.12	$	0.65	$	0.37

Basic and diluted net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share	$	0.46	$	0.56	$	1.49	$	0.88

NOTE 5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company has entered into an investment advisory agreement with TICC Management. TICC Management is controlled by BDC Partners, its managing member. In addition to BDC Partners, TICC Management is owned by Royce & Associates, LLC (“Royce & Associates”) as the non-managing member. BDC Partners, as the managing member of TICC Management, manages the business and internal affairs of TICC Management. In addition, BDC Partners provides TICC with office facilities and administrative services pursuant to an administration agreement (the “Administration Agreement”). Jonathan H. Cohen, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, as well as a director, is the managing member of BDC Partners. Saul B. Rosenthal, the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer, is also the President and Chief Operating Officer of TICC Management and a member of BDC Partners. Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal have an equal equity interest in BDC Partners. Charles M. Royce, the Company’s non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors, is President and Chief Investment Officer of Royce & Associates. Royce & Associates, as the non-managing member of TICC Management, does not take part in the management or participate in the operations of TICC Management; however, Royce & Associates has agreed to make Mr. Royce or certain other portfolio managers available to TICC Management to provide certain consulting services without compensation. Royce & Associates is a wholly owned subsidiary of Legg Mason, Inc. BDC Partners is also the managing member of Oxford Gate Capital, LLC, a private fund in which Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal, along with certain investment and administrative personnel of TICC Management, are invested.

The Company pays BDC Partners an allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by BDC Partners in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including a portion of the rent and the compensation of the chief financial officer, chief compliance officer, controller and other administrative support personnel, which creates conflicts of interest that the Board of Directors must monitor.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

The investment advisory fee for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $1.7 million, representing primarily the base fee, as well as an investment advisory incentive fee of approximately $482,000. The investment advisory fee for the quarter ended September 30 2009 was approximately $1.1 million, which consisted entirely of the base fee for the period. The investment advisory fee for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $4.7 million, representing the base fee, as well as income incentive fee of approximately $1.0 million. The investment advisory fee for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was approximately $3.0 million which consisted of the base fee, as well as incentive fees of approximately $47,000. At each of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, approximately $1.7 million and $1.1 million of investment advisory fees remained payable to TICC Management.

Pursuant to the terms of its administration agreement with BDC Partners, for the quarters ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 respectively, TICC incurred approximately $244,000 and $226,000 in compensation expenses for employees allocated to the administrative activities of TICC; for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, TICC incurred approximately $723,000 and $678,000 in such expenses, respectively, of which $338,000 and $300,000 remained payable at the end of each respective period. TICC also incurred approximately $20,000 for reimbursement of facility costs both for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009; for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, TICC incurred approximately $60,000 and $59,000, of which amounts $0 remained payable at the end of each respective period.

NOTE 6. DIVIDENDS

The Company intends to continue to operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a RIC under the Code and, as such, the Company would not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of its taxable income and gains distributed to stockholders. To qualify as a RIC, the Company is required, among other requirements, to distribute at least 90% of its annual investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code. The amount to be paid out as a dividend is determined by the Board of Directors each quarter and is based upon the annual earnings estimated by the management of the Company. To the extent that the Company’s earnings fall below the amount of dividends declared, however, a portion of the total amount of the Company’s dividends for the fiscal year may be deemed a return of capital for tax purposes to the Company’s stockholders.

On September 30, 2010, the Company paid a dividend of $0.22 per share. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2010, the Company distributed $0.57 per share. The Company has a dividend reinvestment plan under which all distributions are paid to stockholders in the form of additional shares, unless a stockholder elects to receive cash.

NOTE 7. NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE

The Company’s net asset value per share at September 30, 2010 was $9.27, and at December 31, 2009 was $8.36. In determining the Company’s net asset value per share, the Board of Directors determined in good faith the fair value of the Company’s portfolio investments for which reliable market quotations are not readily available.

NOTE 8. PAYMENT-IN-KIND INTEREST

The Company may have investments in its portfolio which contain a payment-in-kind, or PIK, provision. The PIK interest is added to the cost basis of the investment and recorded as income. To maintain the Company’s status as a RIC (as discussed in Note 6 above), this non-cash source of income must be paid out to stockholders in the form of dividends, even though the Company has not yet collected the cash. Amounts necessary to pay these dividends may come from available cash or the liquidation of certain investments. For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company received approximately $71,000 and $69,000 in PIK interest, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded PIK interest of approximately $357,000 and $80,000, respectively.

In addition, the Company recorded discount income of approximately $2.1 million and $714,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, representing the amortization of discount attributed to certain debt securities purchased by the Company, including original issue discount (“OID”). The Company had discount income of approximately $5.5 million (including discount income derived from cash remittances on discounted securities) and $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

NOTE 9. OTHER INCOME

The Company receives various fees in connection with its investments in portfolio companies, including commitment fees, origination fees and amendment fees. Such fees are normally paid at closing of the Company’s investments, are fully earned and non-refundable, and are generally non-recurring. The Company recorded fee income of approximately $102,000 and $6,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded fee income of approximately $563,000 and $63,000, respectively.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

The Company also receives distributions on the “equity” tranches of securitization vehicles in which it invests. These tranches represent the residual economic interests in such securitization vehicles, and distributions are determined by the respective trustee on a quarterly basis. The distributions are recognized in the period that they are finally determined and payable. The Company received approximately $959,000 in such distributions during the quarter ended September 30, 2010, compared to $0 for the same period last year. The Company received distributions of approximately $2.7 million and $0 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The 1940 Act requires that a business development company make available managerial assistance to its qualified portfolio companies. The Company may receive fee income for managerial assistance it renders to qualified portfolio companies in connection with its investments. For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, the Company received no fee income for managerial assistance.

NOTE 10. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Financial highlights for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, are as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited)			Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 (unaudited)			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited)			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 (unaudited)

Per Share Data
Net asset value at beginning of period	$	9.03		$	7.66		$	8.36		$	7.68

Net investment income⁽¹⁾		0.25			0.12			0.65			0.37
Net realized and unrealized capital gains⁽²⁾		0.21			0.45			0.83			0.50

Total from investment operations		0.46			0.57			1.48			0.87

Total distributions⁽³⁾		(0.22	)		(0.15	)		(0.57	)		(0.45	)

Effect of shares issued, net of offering expenses		0.00			(0.01	)		0.00			(0.03	)

Net asset value at end of period	$	9.27		$	8.07		$	9.27		$	8.07

Per share market value at beginning of period	$	8.40		$	4.41		$	6.05		$	3.80
Per share market value at end of period	$	10.35		$	5.04		$	10.35		$	5.04
Total return⁽⁴⁾		25.83	%		17.69	%		82.94	%		44.47	%
Shares outstanding at end of period		26,989,408			26,747,561			26,989,408			26,747,561

Ratios/Supplemental Data
Net assets at end of period (000’s)	$	250,278		$	215,805		$	250,278		$	215,805
Average net assets (000’s)	$	244,873		$	205,091		$	237,008		$	202,688
Ratio of expenses to average net assets⁽⁵⁾		4.05	%		3.45	%		3.83	%		3.32	%
Ratio of expenses, excluding interest expense, to average net assets⁽⁵⁾		4.05	%		3.45	%		3.83	%		3.32	%
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets⁽⁵⁾		10.79	%		6.20	%		9.88	%		6.54	%

⁽¹⁾	Represents per share net investment income for the period, based upon average shares outstanding.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

⁽²⁾	Net realized and unrealized capital gains include rounding adjustment to reconcile change in net asset value per share.

⁽³⁾

Management monitors available taxable earnings, including net investment income and realized capital gains, to determine if a tax return of capital may occur for the year. To the extent the Company’s taxable earnings fall below the total amount of the Company’s distributions for that fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a tax return of capital to the Company’s stockholders. The tax character of distributions will be determined at the end of the fiscal year. However, if the character of such distributions were determined as of September 30, 2010, none of the distributions for 2010 would have been characterized as a tax return of capital to the Company’s stockholders; this tax return of capital may differ from the return of capital calculated with reference to net investment income for financial reporting purposes.

⁽⁴⁾	Total return equals the increase or decrease of ending market value over beginning market value, plus distributions, divided by the beginning market value, assuming dividend reinvestment prices obtained under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan. Total return is not annualized.

⁽⁵⁾	Annualized.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

NOTE 11. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, cash and cash equivalents consisted of:


	September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Eurodollar Time Deposit (due 1/4/10)	$	0	$	23,759,409

Total Cash Equivalents		0		23,759,409
Cash		13,138,904		213,476

Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	13,138,904	$	23,972,885

For the nine month period ending September 30, 2010 and throughout the twelve months ending December 31, 2009, the Company elected to maintain most of its available cash in a non-interest bearing demand deposit.

NOTE 12. COMMITMENTS

As of September 30, 2010, the Company had outstanding a commitment to purchase an additional debt investment of approximately $909,100 on its debt investment in Birch Communications, Inc.

NOTE 13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 22, 2010, the Company sold its debt investment in Workflow Management, Inc., $5,632,355 in principal, at a price of 93.5% of par. The transaction is expected to settle within 20 days of the trade date.

On November 2, 2010, the Board of Directors declared a distribution of $0.24 per share for the fourth quarter, payable on December 31, 2010 to shareholders of record as of December 10, 2010.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes and schedules thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as the sections entitled “Selected Financial Data” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the financial statements and related notes and schedules thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, our beliefs, and our assumptions. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” and “estimates” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements including without limitation:

•

an economic downturn could impair our customers’ ability to repay our loans and increase our non-performing assets,

•

an economic downturn could disproportionately impact the industries in which we concentrate causing us to suffer losses in our portfolio and experience diminished demand for capital in this industry sector,

•

a contraction of available credit and/or an inability to access the equity markets could impair our lending and investment activities,

•

interest rate volatility could adversely affect our results, and

•

the risks, uncertainties and other factors we identify in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our filings with the SEC.

Although we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also could be inaccurate. Important assumptions include our ability to originate new loans and investments, certain margins and levels of profitability and the availability of additional capital. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this annual report should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. These risks and uncertainties include those described or identified in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Except as otherwise specified, references to “TICC,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to TICC Capital Corp.

The following analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

OVERVIEW

Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolio’s total return. Our primary focus is to seek current income by investing primarily in non-public debt securities. We have also invested and may continue to invest in structured finance vehicles which own debt securities. We may also invest in publicly traded debt and/or equity securities. We operate as a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company and have elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). We have elected to be treated for tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), beginning with our 2003 taxable year.

Our investment activities are managed by TICC Management, LLC (“TICC Management”), a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. TICC Management is owned by BDC Partners, LLC (“BDC Partners”), its managing member, and Royce & Associates, LLC (“Royce & Associates”) as a non-managing member. Jonathan H. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer, and Saul B. Rosenthal, our President and Chief Operating Officer, are the members of BDC Partners, and Charles M. Royce, our non-executive chairman, is the President of Royce & Associates. Under an investment advisory agreement (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”), we have agreed to pay TICC Management an annual base fee calculated on gross assets, and an incentive fee based upon our performance. Under an administration agreement (the “Administration Agreement”), we have agreed to pay or reimburse BDC Partners, as administrator, for certain expenses incurred in operating the Company. Our executive officers and

directors, and the executive officers of TICC Management and BDC Partners, serve or may serve as officers and directors of entities that operate in a line of business similar to our own. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us or our stockholders. For more information, see “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to our Business and Structure—There are significant potential conflicts of interest, which could impact our investment returns.”

We currently concentrate our investments in companies having annual revenues of less than $200 million and/or an equity capitalization of less than $300 million. While the structure of our investments will vary, we invest primarily in the debt of established businesses. We seek to invest in entities that, as a general matter, have been operating for at least one year prior to the date of our investment and that will, at the time of our investment, have employees and revenues, and are cash flow positive. Many of these companies will have financial backing provided by private equity or venture capital funds or other financial or strategic sponsors at the time we make an investment.

We expect that our investments will generally range between $5 million and $30 million each, although this investment size may vary proportionately as the size of our capital base changes and market conditions warrant, and accrue interest at fixed or variable rates. As of September 30, 2010, our debt investments had stated interest rates of between 2.37% and 15.58% (excluding our investment in GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc. which carries a zero interest rate through October 30, 2014) and maturity dates of between 10 and 145 months (excluding our investment in WAICCS Las Vegas, LLC). In addition, our total portfolio had a weighted average yield on debt investments of approximately 13.8% including all investments in our portfolio.

Our loans may carry a provision for deferral of some or all of the interest payments and amendment fees, which will be added to the principal amount of the loan. This form of deferred income is referred to as “payment-in-kind,” or “PIK,” interest or other income and, when earned, is recorded as interest or other income and an increase in the principal amount of the loan. For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we recognized approximately $71,000 of interest income attributable to PIK associated with our investments in Shearer’s Food, Inc., Allen Systems Group, Inc., Cavtel Holdings, LLC and Workflow Management, Inc., compared to PIK income of approximately $69,000 during the quarter ended September 30, 2009.

We have historically and may continue to borrow funds to make investments. As a result, we may be exposed to the risks of leverage, which may be considered a speculative investment technique. Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain and loss on amounts invested and therefore increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. In addition, the costs associated with our borrowings, including any increase in the management fee payable to TICC Management, will be borne by our common stockholders.

In addition, as a business development company under the 1940 Act, we are required to make available significant managerial assistance, for which we may receive fees, to our qualified portfolio companies. These fees would be generally non-recurring, however in some instances they may have a recurring component. We have received no fee income for managerial assistance to date.

Prior to making a bilateral investment, we typically enter into a non-binding term sheet with the potential portfolio company. These term sheets are generally subject to a number of conditions, including but not limited to the satisfactory completion of our due diligence investigations of the company’s business and legal documentation for the loan.

To the extent possible, our loans will be collateralized by a security interest in the borrower’s assets or guaranteed by a principal to the transaction. Interest payments, if not deferred, are normally payable quarterly with most debt investments having scheduled principal payments on a monthly or quarterly basis. When we receive a warrant to purchase stock in a portfolio company, the warrant will typically have a nominal strike price, and will entitle us to purchase a modest percentage of the borrower’s stock.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we closed approximately $44.7 million in portfolio investments, including an additional investment of approximately $2.7 million in an existing portfolio company and approximately $42.0 million of investments in new portfolio companies. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we recognized a total of $13.4 million from principal repayments on debt investments, and we recognized approximately $34.5 million from the sale of portfolio investments. We realized net gains on investments during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 in the amount of approximately $867,000.

Based upon the fair value determinations made in good faith by the Board of Directors, during the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we had net unrealized gains of approximately $5.0 million, comprised of $9.7 million in gross unrealized appreciation, $4.1 million in gross unrealized depreciation and approximately $0.6 million relating to the reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation as certain investments were realized. The most significant changes in net unrealized appreciation and depreciation during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 were as follows (in millions):


Portfolio Company	Unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

American Integration Technologies, LLC	$	3.3
SCS Holdings II, Inc		0.7
Landmark V CDO LTD		0.4
ACA CLO 2006-2, Limited		0.4
GXS Worldwide Inc		0.4
First Data Corporation		(0.3	)
Workflow Management, Inc		(0.7	)
Palm, Inc		(0.5	)
All other, net		1.3


Total	$	5.0

During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, we recorded net realized losses of approximately $10.5 million due largely to losses associated with the repayment of our debt investment in Falcon Communications, Inc. of approximately $9.5 million, a cost adjustment related to the restructuring of our debt investment in Punch Software, LLC of approximately $0.6 million and the partial sale of our debt investment in Palm Inc. of approximately $0.4 million.

Based upon the fair value determinations made in good faith by the Board of Directors, during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, we had net unrealized gains of approximately $22.3 million, comprised of $14.3 million in unrealized appreciation, $2.8 million in unrealized depreciation and approximately $10.8 million relating to the reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation as certain investments were realized. The most significant changes in net unrealized appreciation and depreciation during the three months ended September 30, 2009 were as follows (in millions):


Portfolio Company	Unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

Falcon Communications, Inc.	$	9.5
Questia Media, Inc.		2.2
Palm, Inc.		1.9
Segovia, Inc.		1.7
Workflow Management, Inc.		1.2
American Integration Technologies, LLC		1.0
Cavtel Holdings, LLC		1.0
Hyland Software, Inc.		0.9
Power Tools, Inc.		0.7
AKQA, Inc.		0.7
GXS Worldwide Inc.		0.6
Fusionstorm, Inc.		0.6


Portfolio Company	Unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

Punch Software LLC		0.6
First Data Corporation		0.5
Stratus Technologies, Inc.		0.4
Netquote, Inc.		0.4
Box Services, LLC		(2.5	)
All other, net		0.9


Total	$	22.3

Current Market and Economic Conditions

Since mid-2007, global credit and other financial markets have suffered substantial stress, volatility, illiquidity and disruption. These developments caused a series of failures and restructurings among a large number of financial institutions, which either participated in the origination and distribution of structured or syndicated loan credit products, or invested in them. The debt and equity capital markets in the United States have been impacted by significant write-offs in the financial services sector relating to these products and the re-pricing of credit risk in the loan market, among other things.

These events have constrained the availability of capital for the market as a whole, and the financial services sector in particular. During 2009 the syndicated corporate loans market experienced both unprecedented price declines and volatility. While prices remained depressed across many sectors and ratings categories through most of 2009, we witnessed a strong upward move during the second half of 2009, which has continued into 2010. Although corporate loan prices are still below historical averages, our view is that certain, and primarily larger-issuer, broadly syndicated corporate loans still do not adequately reflect the spreads necessary to compensate investors for the risks involved. In view of the above circumstances, we continue to focus more heavily on middle market issuers and to a limited extent larger issuers, and opportunistically, on certain structured finance investments, including collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) investment vehicles. We have and primarily continue to review a large number of middle market loans and CLO investment vehicles, and have recently made a number of selective purchases in these markets.

During the past two years, we have seen dramatic dislocations across the global credit markets. Companies that several years ago would have had access to debt capital at low credit spreads are now borrowing money at higher credit spreads with more onerous terms. As a result we believe that we may now have the opportunity to provide debt capital to primarily middle market companies representing strong credits on more favorable terms than during the period prior to the dislocation of the credit markets. Additionally, we may now have attractive opportunities to provide capital to some larger companies than we would have been able to lend to in the past through our participation in syndicated debt transactions. As such, we view the current market environment as potentially more favorable for us than during the period prior to the dislocation of the credit markets. However, we cannot assure you whether we will be able to obtain additional debt or equity capital on terms that are acceptable to us. If we are unable to obtain such additional financing, our ability to benefit from the current dislocations within the global credit markets may be limited.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. We have identified our investment valuation policy as a critical accounting policy.

Investment Valuation

The most significant estimate inherent in the preparation of our financial statements is the valuation of investments and the related amounts of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments recorded. There is no single method for determining fair value in good faith. As a result, determining fair value requires that judgment be applied to the specific facts and circumstances of each portfolio investment while employing a consistently applied valuation process for the types of investments we make. We are required to specifically fair value each individual investment on a quarterly basis.

We adopted ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, which establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements, on January 1, 2008. ASC 820-10 clarified the definition of fair value and requires companies to expand their disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities in interim and annual periods subsequent to initial recognition. ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820-10 also establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, which includes inputs such as quoted prices for similar securities in active markets and quoted prices for identical securities in markets that are not active; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. We have determined that due to the general illiquidity of the market for our investment portfolio, whereby little or no market data exists, all of our investments are based upon “Level 3” inputs.

Our Board of Directors determines the value of our investment portfolio each quarter. In connection with that determination, members of TICC Management’s portfolio management team prepare portfolio company valuations using the most recent portfolio company financial statements and forecasts. Since March 2004, we have engaged third-party valuation firms to provide assistance in valuing our bilateral investments and, more recently, for certain of our syndicated loans, although the Board of Directors ultimately determines the appropriate valuation of each such investment.

Our process for determining the fair value of a bilateral investment begins with determining the enterprise value of the portfolio company. Enterprise value means the entire value of the company to a potential buyer, including the sum of the values of debt and equity securities used to capitalize the enterprise at a point in time. The fair value of our investment is based, in part, on the enterprise value at which the portfolio company could be sold in an orderly disposition over a reasonable period of time between willing parties other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The liquidity event whereby we exit a private investment is generally the sale, the recapitalization or, in some cases, the initial public offering of the portfolio company.

There is no one methodology to determine enterprise value and, in fact, for any one portfolio company, enterprise value is best expressed as a range of fair values, from which we derive a single estimate of enterprise value. To determine the enterprise value of a portfolio company, we analyze the historical and projected financial results, as well as the nature and value of any collateral. We also use industry valuation benchmarks and public market comparables. We also consider other events, including private mergers and acquisitions, a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent debt or equity sale or restructuring, and include these events in the enterprise valuation process. We generally require portfolio companies to provide annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements, as well as annual projections for the upcoming fiscal year.

Typically, our bilateral debt investments are valued on the basis of a fair value determination arrived at through an analysis of the borrower’s financial and operating condition or other factors, as well as consideration of the entity’s enterprise value. The types of factors that we may take into account in valuing our investments include: market trading and transaction comparables, applicable market yields and multiples, security covenants, call protection provisions, the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings and discounted cash flows, among other factors. The fair value of equity interests in portfolio companies is determined based on various factors, including the enterprise value remaining for equity holders after the repayment of the portfolio company’s debt and other preference capital, and other pertinent factors such as recent offers to purchase a portfolio company, recent transactions involving the purchase or sale of the portfolio company’s equity securities, or other liquidity events. The determined equity values are generally discounted when we have a minority position, restrictions on resale, specific concerns about the receptivity of the capital markets to a specific company at a certain time, or other factors.

We will record unrealized depreciation on bilateral investments when we believe that an investment has become impaired, including where collection of a loan or realization of an equity security is doubtful. We will record unrealized appreciation if we believe that the underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and our equity security has also appreciated in value. Changes in fair value are recorded in the statement of operations as net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation.

Under the valuation procedures approved by the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Valuation Committee, a third-party valuation firm will prepare valuations for each of our bilateral investments for which market quotations are not readily available that, when combined with all other investments in the same portfolio company, (i) have a value as of the previous quarter of greater than or equal to 2.5% of our total assets as of the previous quarter, and (ii) have a value as of the current quarter of greater than or equal to 2.5% of our total assets as of the previous quarter, after taking into account any repayment of principal during the current quarter. In addition, the frequency of those third-party valuations of our portfolio securities is based upon the grade assigned to each such security under our credit grading system as follows: Grade 1, at least annually; Grade 2, at least semi-annually; Grades 3, 4, and 5, at least quarterly. TICC Management also retains the authority to seek, on our behalf, additional third party valuations with respect to both our bilateral portfolio securities and our syndicated loan investments. The Board of Directors retains ultimate authority as to the third-party review cycle as well as the appropriate valuation of each investment.

Given the continued economic downturn, the market for syndicated loans has become increasingly illiquid with limited or no transactions for many of those securities which we hold. On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued additional guidelines under ASC 820-10-35, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly,” which provides guidance on factors that should be considered in determining when a previously active market becomes inactive and whether a transaction is orderly. In accordance with ASC 820-10-35, our valuation

procedures specifically provide for the review of indicative quotes supplied by the large agent banks that make a market for each security. However, the marketplace for which we obtain indicative bid quotes for purposes of determining the fair value of our syndicated loan investments have shown these attributes of illiquidity as described by ASC-820-10-35. Due to the market illiquidity and the lack of transactions since 2008, we determined that the current agent bank non-binding indicative bids for the substantial majority of our syndicated investments may not be considered reliable, and alternative valuation procedures would need to be performed until liquidity returns to the marketplace. As such, we have engaged third-party valuation firms to provide assistance in valuing certain of our syndicated investments. In addition, TICC Management prepares an analysis of each syndicated loan, including a financial summary, covenant compliance review, recent trading activity in the security, if known, and other business developments related to the portfolio company. All available information, including non-binding indicative bids which may not be considered reliable, is presented to the Valuation Committee to consider in its determination of fair value. In some instances, there may be limited trading activity in a security even though the market for the security is considered not active. In such cases the Valuation Committee will consider the number of trades, the size and timing of each trade, and other circumstances around such trades, to the extent such information is available, in its determination of fair value. The Valuation Committee will evaluate the impact of such additional information, and factor it into its consideration of the fair value that is indicated by the analysis provided by third-party valuation firms. We have considered the factors described in ASC 820-10 and have determined that we are properly valuing the securities in our portfolio.

During the past several quarters, the Company has acquired a number of debt and equity positions in CLO investment vehicles. These investments are special purpose financing vehicles. In valuing such investments, the Company considers the operating metrics of the specific investment vehicle, including compliance with collateralization tests, defaulted and restructured securities, and payment defaults, if any. In addition, the Company considers the indicative prices provided by the broker who arranges transactions in such investment vehicles, as well as any available information on other relevant transactions in the market. TICC Management or the Valuation Committee may request an additional analysis by a third-party firm to assist in the valuation process of CLO investment vehicles. All information is presented to the Board of Directors for its determination of fair value of these investments.

The Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to the disclosure requirements of ASC 820-10-35 at September 30, 2010, were as follows:


($ in millions)	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Assets	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Cash and cash equivalents	$	13.1	$	0.0	$	0.0	$	13.1
Senior Secured Notes		0.0		0.0		178.4		178.4
CLO Debt		0.0		0.0		37.4		37.4
CLO Equity		0.0		0.0		6.7		6.7
Common Stock		0.0		0.0		6.0		6.0
Subordinated Notes		0.0		0.0		6.2		6.2
Preferred Stock		0.0		0.0		1.9		1.9
Warrants to purchase equity		0.0		0.0		0.4		0.4


Total	$	13.1	$	0.0	$	237.0	$	250.1

A reconciliation of the fair value of investments for three months ending September 30, 2010, utilizing significant unobservable inputs, is as follows:


($ in millions)	Senior Secured Note Investments			Collateralized Loan Obligation Debt Investments			Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investments		Common Stock Investments		Subordinated Note Investments			Preferred Share Equity Investments		Warrants to Purchase Common Stock Investments		Total
Balance at June 30, 2010	$	184.5		$	22.9		$	6.5	$	6.0	$	6.5		$	1.9	$	0.4	$	228.7
Realized gains included in earnings		0.5			0.0			0.0		0.0		0.0			0.0		0.0		0.5
Unrealized appreciation included in earnings		3.3			1.7			0.2		0.0		0.1			0.0		0.0		5.3
Accretion of discount		1.1			0.3			0.0		0.0		0.0			0.0		0.0		1.4
Purchases		32.0			12.7			0.0		0.0		0.0			0.0		0.0		44.7
Repayments and Sales⁽¹⁾		(43.0	)		(0.2	)		0.0		0.0		(0.4	)		0.0		0.0		(43.6	)
Transfers in and/or out of level 3		0.0			0.0			0.0		0.0		0.0			0.0		0.0		0.0

Balance at September 30, 2010	$	178.4		$	37.4		$	6.7	$	6.0	$	6.2		$	1.9	$	0.4	$	237.0

The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to our Level 3 assets still held at the reporting date and reported within the net change in unrealized gains or losses on investments in our Statement of Operations	$	3.6		$	1.7		$	0.2	$	0.0	$	0.1		$	0.0	$	0.0	$	5.6

(1)	Includes PIK interest of approximately $71,000 and rounding adjustments to reconcile period end balances.

A reconciliation of the fair value of investments for nine months ending September 30, 2010, utilizing significant unobservable inputs, is as follows:


($ in millions)	Senior Secured Note Investments			Collateralized Loan Obligation Debt Investments			Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investments			Common Stock Investments		Subordinated Note Investments			Preferred Share Equity Investments		Warrants to Purchase Common Stock Investments			Total
Balance at December 31, 2009	$	180.1		$	4.9		$	2.2		$	5.5	$	2.7		$	0.0	$	0.5		$	195.9
Realized Losses included in earnings		(29.4	)		0.0			0.0			0.0		0.0			0.0		0.0			(29.4	)
Unrealized appreciation included in earnings		48.4			2.3			(0.4	)		0.1		0.8			1.1		(0.1	)		52.2
Accretion of discount		3.6			0.6			0.0			0.0		0.0			0.0		0.0			4.2
Purchases⁽¹⁾		57.3			31.5			4.9			0.4		3.9			0.8		0.0			98.8
Repayments and Sales⁽²⁾		(81.6	)		(1.9	)		0.0			0.0		(1.2	)		0.0		0.0			(84.7	)
Transfers in and/or out of level 3		0.0			0.0			0.0			0.0		0.0			0.0		0.0			0.0

Balance at September 30, 2010	$	178.4		$	37.4		$	6.7		$	6.0	$	6.2		$	1.9	$	0.4		$	237.0

The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to our Level 3 assets still held at the reporting date and reported within the net change in unrealized gains or losses on investments in our Statement of Operations	$	16.5		$	2.3		$	(0.4	)	$	0.1	$	0.8		$	1.1	$	(0.1	)	$	20.3

(1)	Purchases include rounding adjustments to reconcile period end balances.

(2)	Includes PIK interest of approximately $357,000.

The Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to the disclosure requirements of ASC 820-10-35 at December 31, 2009, were as follows:


($ in millions)	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Assets	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total
Cash equivalents	$	23.8	$	0.0	$	0.0	$	23.8
Bilateral investments		0.0		0.0		84.8		84.8
Syndicated investments		0.0		4.4		104.0		108.4
Collateralized loan obligation investments		0.0		0.0		7.1		7.1

Total	$	23.8	$	4.4	$	195.9	$	224.1

The following table shows the fair value of TICC’s portfolio of investments by asset class as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:


	September 30, 2010					December 31, 2009
	Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
	(dollars in millions)					(dollars in millions)
Senior Secured Notes	$	178.4		75.3	%	$	184.6		92.1	%
CLO Debt		37.4		15.8	%		4.9		2.5	%
CLO Equity		6.7		2.8	%		2.2		1.1	%
Subordinated Notes		6.2		2.6	%		2.7		1.4	%
Common Stock		6.0		2.5	%		5.4		2.7	%
Preferred Stock		1.9		0.8	%		0.0		0.0	%
Warrants		0.4		0.2	%		0.5		0.2	%

Total	$	237.0		100.0	%	$	200.3		100.0	%

PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION AND INVESTMENT ACTIVITY

The total fair value of our investment portfolio was approximately $ 237.0 million and $200.3 million as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The increase in investments during the nine month period was due primarily to new portfolio investments of approximately $99.0 million and net unrealized appreciation of approximately $51.6 million. These increases were partially offset by debt repayments and sales of securities totaling approximately $89.3 million, and net realized losses of approximately $29.1 million.

In certain instances, we receive payments based on scheduled amortization of the outstanding balances and sales of portfolio investments. In addition, we receive repayments of some of our debt investments prior to their scheduled maturity date. The frequency or volume of these repayments may fluctuate significantly from period to period. For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we received proceeds of approximately $13.4 million resulting primarily from repayments and recurring amortization payments on outstanding balances on our debt investments, whereas for the year ended December 31, 2009, we had repayments and amortization payments of approximately $68.9 million. The repayments on our debt investments during the quarter ended September 30, 2010, of approximately $13.4 million, largely consisted of repayment of our original investment in senior secured notes issued by Palm, Inc. of approximately $9.5 million. Also, during the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we recognized proceeds of approximately $34.5 million from the sale of investments, primarily from the sale of our investment in senior secured notes issued by NetQuote, Inc. for approximately $19.0 million and the partial sale of our investment in senior secured notes issued by SCS Holdings II, Inc. of approximately $6.4 million. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we recognized proceeds of approximately $14.0 million from the sales of investments.

As of September 30, 2010, we had investments in debt securities of, or loans to, 47 portfolio companies, with a fair value of approximately $222.0 million, and equity investments in 10 portfolio companies, with a fair value of approximately $15.0 million. As of December 31, 2009, we had investments in debt securities of, or loans to, 33 portfolio companies, with a fair value of approximately $192.2 million, and equity investments in 8 portfolio companies, with a fair value of approximately $8.1 million.

A reconciliation of the investment portfolio for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009 follows:


	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
	(dollars in millions)			(dollars in millions)
Beginning Investment Portfolio	$	200.3		$	189.6
Portfolio Investments Acquired		99.0			68.9
Debt Repayments		(42.0	)		(68.9	)
Sales of Securities		(47.3	)		(14.0	)
Payment in Kind		0.3			0.2
Original Issue Discount		4.2			2.8
Net Unrealized Appreciation		51.6			32.2
Net Realized Losses		(29.1	)		(10.5	)

Ending Investment Portfolio	$	237.0		$	200.3

The following table indicates the quarterly portfolio investment activity for each quarter in the period ended September 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009:


	New Investments		Debt Repayments		Sales of Securities
	(dollars in millions)		(dollars in millions)		(dollars in millions)
Quarter ended
September 30, 2010	$	44.7	$	13.4	$	34.5
June 30, 2010		15.0		10.8		6.6
March 31, 2010		39.3		17.8		6.2

Total	$	99.0	$	42.0	$	47.3

December 31, 2009	$	33.0	$	23.3	$	6.0
September 30, 2009		24.5		23.2		4.2
June 30, 2009		11.4		18.9		3.8
March 31, 2009		0.0		3.5		0.0

Total	$	68.9	$	68.9	$	14.0

The following table shows the fair value of our portfolio of investments by asset class as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:


	September 30, 2010					December 31, 2009
	Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
	(dollars in millions)					(dollars in millions)
Senior Secured Notes	$	178.4		75.3	%	$	184.6		92.1	%
CLO Debt		37.4		15.8	%		4.9		2.5	%
CLO Equity		6.7		2.8	%		2.2		1.1	%
Subordinated Notes		6.2		2.6	%		2.7		1.4	%
Common Stock		6.0		2.5	%		5.4		2.7	%
Preferred Stock		1.9		0.8	%		0.0		0.0	%
Warrants		0.4		0.2	%		0.5		0.2	%

Total	$	237.0		100.0	%	$	200.3		100.0	%

The following table shows our portfolio of investments by industry at fair value, as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:


	September 30, 2010					December 31, 2009
	Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Fair Value			Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Fair Value
	(dollars in millions)					(dollars in millions)
Software	$	67.7		28.6	%	$	44.8		22.4	%
Structured finance		44.1		18.6	%		7.1		3.5	%
Semiconductor capital equipment		22.6		9.5	%		8.4		4.2	%
Enterprise software		20.0		8.5	%		12.1		6.0	%
Telecommunications services		16.1		6.8	%		10.9		5.5	%
Computer hardware		10.4		4.4	%		4.5		2.2	%
IT value-added reseller		9.0		3.8	%		14.8		7.4	%
Advertising		8.3		3.5	%		8.2		4.1	%
Printing and publishing		5.2		2.2	%		3.2		1.6	%
Printing and document management		5.1		2.1	%		6.3		3.1	%
Grocery		4.9		2.1	%		4.9		2.4	%
Shipping and transportation		4.7		2.0	%		4.8		2.4	%
Food products manufacturer		4.1		1.7	%		0.0		0.0	%
Retail food products		4.0		1.7	%		4.7		2.4	%
Healthcare		3.3		1.4	%		3.4		1.7	%
Auto parts manufacturer		2.9		1.2	%		0.0		0.0	%
IT consulting		2.6		1.1	%		3.1		1.6	%
Interactive voice messaging service		2.0		0.8	%		2.0		1.0	%
Web-based services		0.0		0.0	%		20.8		10.4	%
Consumer electronics		0.0		0.0	%		12.5		6.2	%
Business services		0.0		0.0	%		4.4		2.2	%
Real estate development		0.0		0.0	%		1.5		0.7	%
Digital media		0.0		0.0	%		13.8		6.9	%
Digital imaging		0.0		0.0	%		4.1		2.1	%

	$	237.0		100.0	%	$	200.3		100.0	%

PORTFOLIO GRADING

We have adopted an internal credit grading system to monitor the quality of our debt investment portfolio. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, our portfolio had a weighted average grade of 2.4 and 2.5, respectively, based upon the fair value of the debt investments in the portfolio. Equity securities are not graded.

At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, our debt investment portfolio was graded as follows:


		September 30, 2010
Grade	Summary Description	Principal Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Portfolio at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
		(dollars in millions)					(dollars in millions)
1	Company is ahead of expectations and/or outperforming financial covenant requirements and such trend is expected to continue.	$	12.5		4.5	%	$	12.3		5.5	%
2	Full repayment of principal and interest is expected.		169.0		60.7	%		134.4		60.6	%
3	Closer monitoring is required. Full repayment of principal and interest is expected.		78.7		28.2	%		73.3		33.0	%
4	A reduction of interest income has occurred or is expected to occur. No loss of principal is expected.		—		0.0	%		—		0.0	%
5	A loss of some portion of principal is expected.		18.5		6.6	%		2.0		0.9	%

		$	278.7		100.0	%	$	222.0		100.0	%


		December 31, 2009
Grade	Summary Description	Principal Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio			Portfolio at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
		(dollars in millions)					(dollars in millions)
1	Company is ahead of expectations and/or outperforming financial covenant requirements and such trend is expected to continue.	$	26.0		9.7	%	$	25.5		13.3	%
2	Full repayment of principal and interest is expected.		94.3		35.1	%		84.9		44.2	%
3	Closer monitoring is required. Full repayment of principal and interest is expected.		73.9		27.5	%		65.7		34.2	%
4	A reduction of interest income has occurred or is expected to occur. No loss of principal is expected.		—		0.0	%		—		0.0	%
5	A loss of some portion of principal is expected.		74.3		27.7	%		16.0		8.3	%

		$	268.5		100.0	%	$	192.1		100.0	%

We expect that a portion of our investments will be in the grades 3, 4 or 5 categories from time to time, and, as such, we will be required to work with troubled portfolio companies to improve their business and protect our investment. The number and amount of investments included in grades 3, 4 or 5 may fluctuate from period to period.

Further discussion regarding the other investments which experienced significant unrealized depreciation is presented in “Results of Operations.”

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Set forth below is a comparison of our results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2010 to the three months ended September 30, 2009.

Investment Income

As of September 30, 2010, our debt investments had stated interest rates of between 2.37% and 15.58% (excluding our investment in GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc. which carries a zero interest rate through October 30, 2014) and maturity dates of between 10 and 145 months (excluding our investment in WAICCS Las Vegas, LLC). In addition, our total portfolio had a weighted average yield on debt investments of approximately 13.8% including all investments in the portfolio, compared to 8.4% as of September 30, 2009.

Investment income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $9.1 million compared to approximately $4.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. This increase was due largely to an increase in the amount of performing assets in the portfolio, greater return on our investment portfolio due to the amortization of discounts on new debt investments and distributions from the equity interests in our securitization vehicle investments. The total principal value of income producing debt investments as of September 30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $260.2 million and $189.5 million, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, investment income consisted of approximately $5.9 million in cash interest from portfolio investments, approximately $1.5 million in amortization of original issue and market discount, approximately $611,000 of discount income derived from unscheduled principal cash remittances at par on discounted debt securities, approximately $959,000 in distributions from the equity interest in securitized vehicle investments and approximately $71,000 in PIK interest.

For the three months ended September 30, 2010, fee income of approximately $102,000 was recorded, compared to fee income of approximately $6,000 for the same period in 2009. Fee income consists of non-recurring fees in connection with our investments in portfolio companies, including commitment fees, origination fees and amendment fees.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 were approximately $2.5 million. This amount consisted of investment advisory fees, compensation expense, professional fees, and general and administrative expenses. Expenses increased approximately $700,000 from the quarter ended September 30, 2009, attributable primarily to higher investment advisory fees. Operating expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 were approximately $1.8 million.

The investment advisory fee for the third quarter of 2010 was approximately $1.7 million, representing primarily the base fee as provided for in the Investment Advisory Agreement, as well as an investment advisory incentive fee of approximately $482,000. The investment advisory fee in the comparable period in 2009 was approximately $1.1 million, which consisted entirely of the base fee for the period. The increase of approximately $633,000 is due to an increase in average gross assets and an increase in pre-incentive fee net investment income. At each of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, approximately $1.7 million and $1.1 million of investment advisory fees remained payable to TICC Management.

Compensation expenses were approximately $244,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, compared to approximately $226,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, reflecting the allocation of compensation expenses for the services of our chief financial officer, our chief compliance officer and our controller, and other administrative support personnel. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, approximately $337,000 and $0 of compensation expenses remained payable.

Professional fees, consisting of legal, valuation, audit and consulting fees, were approximately $337,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, compared to approximately $323,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. This was the result of a higher auditing fees of approximately $86,000 (due to timing) partially offset by a decrease in fees for valuation services of approximately $37,000, lower consulting costs of approximately $21,000 and lower legal fees of approximately $13,000 incurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2010.

General and administrative expenses, consisting primarily of directors’ fees, insurance, transfer agent and custodian fees, office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses, were approximately $187,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to approximately $145,000 for the same period in 2009. This increase was a result of an increase in transaction charges related to participations in syndicated loans of approximately $39,000. Office supplies, facilities costs and other office expenses are allocated to us under the terms of the Administration Agreement.

Realized and Unrealized Gains/Losses on Investments

For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we recorded net realized gains on investments of approximately $867,000, which largely represent the gains associated with the repayment of our debt investments in Palm, Inc. (approximately $540,000) and the sale of our debt investments in First Data Corporation (approximately $394,000) and X-Rite Incorporated (approximately $342,000). These gains were partially offset by the loss associated with our partial sale of our debt investment in SCS Holdings II, Inc. (approximately $612,000).


Portfolio Company	Unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
American Integration Technologies, LLC	$	3.3
SCS Holdings II, Inc.		0.7
Landmark V CDO LTD		0.4
ACA CLO 2006-2, Limited		0.4
GXS Worldwide Inc.		0.4
First Data Corporation		(0.3	)
Workflow Management, Inc.		(0.7	)
Palm, Inc.		(0.5	)
Net all other		1.3

Total	$	5.0

For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, we recorded net realized losses of approximately $10.5 million due largely to losses associated with the repayment of our debt investment in Falcon Communications, Inc. of approximately $9.5 million, a cost adjustment related to the restructuring of our debt investment in Punch Software, LLC of approximately $0.6 million and the partial sale of our debt investment in Palm Inc. of approximately $0.4 million.

Based upon the fair value determinations made in good faith by the Board of Directors, during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, we had net unrealized gains of approximately $22.3 million comprised of $14.3 million in unrealized appreciation, $2.8 million in unrealized depreciation and approximately $10.8 million relating to the reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation as certain investments were realized. The most significant changes in net unrealized appreciation and depreciation during the three months ended September 30, 2009 were as follows (in millions):


Portfolio Company	Unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
Falcon Communications, Inc.	$	9.5
Questia Media, Inc.		2.2
Palm, Inc.		1.9
Segovia, Inc.		1.7
Workflow Management, Inc.		1.2
American Integration Technologies, LLC		1.0


Portfolio Company	Unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
Cavtel Holdings, LLC		1.0
Hyland Software, Inc.		0.9
Power Tools, Inc.		0.7
AKQA, Inc.		0.7
GXS Worldwide Inc.		0.6
Fusionstorm, Inc.		0.6
Punch Software LLC		0.6
First Data Corporation		0.5
Stratus Technologies, Inc.		0.4
Netquote, Inc.		0.4
Box Services, LLC		(2.5	)
Net all other		0.9

Total	$	22.3

Please see “—Portfolio Grading” above for more information.

Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Net Investment Income

Net investment income for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $6.6 million and $3.2 million, respectively. This increase was due largely to a greater return on our investment portfolio due to amortization of discounts on new debt investments, distributions from the equity interests in our securitization vehicle investments as well as an increase in the amount of performing assets in the portfolio.

Based on a weighted-average of 26,932,960 shares outstanding (basic and diluted), the net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per common share for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $0.25 for basic and diluted, compared to approximately $0.12 per share for the same period in 2009.

Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations

We had a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of approximately $12.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, compared to a net increase of approximately $15.0 million for the comparable period in 2009. The increase from net investment income and realized gains on investments in 2010 was offset by lower net unrealized appreciation on investments.

Based on a weighted-average of 26,932,960 shares outstanding (basic and diluted), the net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $0.46 for basic and diluted, compared to a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of approximately $0.56 per share for the same period in 2009.

Please see “—Portfolio Grading” above for more information.

Set forth below is a comparison of our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

Investment Income

Investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $24.4 million compared to approximately $15.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This increase was due largely to an increase in the amount of performing assets in the portfolio, an increase in the amortization of discounts on new debt investments and distributions from the equity interests in our securitization vehicle investments. The total principal value of income producing debt investments as of September 30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $260.2 million and $189.5 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, investment income consisted of approximately $15.8 million in cash interest from portfolio investments, approximately $4.2 million in amortization of original issue and market discount, approximately $1.3 million of discount income derived from unscheduled principal cash remittances at par on discounted debt securities, approximately $2.7 million in distributions from the equity interest in securitized vehicle investments and approximately $357,000 in PIK interest income.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, fee income of approximately $563,000 was recorded, compared to fee income of approximately $63,000 for the same period in 2009. Fee income consists of non-recurring fees in connection with our investments in portfolio companies, including commitment fees, origination fees and amendment fees.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were approximately $6.8 million. This amount consisted of investment advisory fees, compensation expense, professional fees, and general and administrative expenses. Expenses increased approximately $1.7 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2009, attributable primarily to higher investment advisory fees. Operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were approximately $5.1 million.

The investment advisory fee for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $4.7 million, representing the base fee for the period as provided for in the investment advisory agreement as well as income incentive fees earned of approximately $1.0 million. The investment advisory fee in the comparable period in 2009 was approximately $3.0 million which consisted of the base fee for the period as well as incentive fees of approximately $47,000. The total increase of approximately $1.7 million is due to an increase in average gross assets and the increase in pre-incentive fee net investment income. At each of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, approximately $1.7 million and $1.1 million of investment advisory fees remained payable to TICC Management.

Compensation expenses were approximately $723,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to approximately $678,000 for the comparable period in 2009, reflecting the allocation of compensation expenses for the services of our chief financial officer, our chief compliance officer and our controller. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, approximately $337,500 and $0 of compensation expenses remained payable.

Professional fees, consisting of legal, valuation, audit and consulting fees, were approximately $788,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to approximately $893,000 for the comparable period in 2009. This was primarily the result of decreases in legal costs of approximately $122,000 as well as fees for valuation services of approximately $95,000 incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. These costs were partially offset by increased auditing fees of approximately $83,000 (due to timing) incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

General and administrative expenses, consisting primarily of directors’ fees, insurance, transfer agent and custodian fees, office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses, were approximately $603,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to approximately $480,000 for the same period in 2009. This increase was primarily the result of greater proxy related costs of approximately $58,000 as well as an increase in transaction charges related to participations in syndicated loans of approximately $39,000. Office supplies, facilities costs and other office expenses are allocated to us under the terms of the Administration Agreement.

Realized and Unrealized Gains/Losses on Investments

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded net realized losses on investments of approximately $29.1 million, which largely represents the loss of approximately $22.9 million on our investment in The CAPS Group as well as the loss of approximately $7.8 million on our investment in Box Services, LLC.

Based upon the fair value determinations made in good faith by the Board of Directors, during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we had net unrealized gains of approximately $51.6 million, comprised of $34.3 million in gross unrealized appreciation, $12.8 million in gross unrealized depreciation and approximately $30.1 million relating to the reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation as certain investments were realized. The most significant changes in net unrealized appreciation and depreciation during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were as follows (in millions):


Portfolio Company	Unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
The CAPS Group	$	22.9
American Integration Technologies, LLC		13.7
Box Services, LLC		7.8
SCS Holdings II, Inc.		1.9
Pegasus Solutions, Inc.		1.8
Palm, Inc.		1.1
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc.		0.9
Pegasus Solutions, Inc. preferred equity		0.8
Stratus Technologies, Inc. high yield notes		0.8
Power Tools, Inc.		0.8
Fusionstorm, Inc.		0.8
Questia Media, Inc.		0.6
Hyland Software, Inc.		0.5
ACA CLO 2006-2, Limited		0.5
Landmark V CDO LTD		0.4
Lightpoint CLO 2007-8a		0.4
Integra Telecomm, Inc.		(0.5	)
Cavtel Holdings, LLC		(0.5	)
First Data Corporation		(0.7	)
Stratus Technologies, Inc. senior secured notes		(0.7	)
Sargas CLO 2006-1A		(0.9	)
Workflow Management, Inc.		(0.9	)
WAICCS Las Vegas, LLC		(1.5	)
All other, net		1.6

Total	$	51.6

For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we had a net realized loss on investments of approximately $13.8 million, which is primarily comprised of the loss associated with the realization of our debt investment in Falcon Communications, Inc. of approximately $9.5 million, the partial sale of our debt investment in AKQA, Inc. of approximately $1.4 million, as well as approximately $2.5 million resulting from the repayment of notes held in, and sale of warrants issued by, Punch Software, LLC. New notes were subsequently issued by Punch Software, LLC with an amended interest rate and maturity date.

Based upon the fair value determinations made in good faith by the Board of Directors, during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we had net unrealized gains of approximately $27.1 million comprised of $31.8 million in unrealized appreciation, $18.4 million in unrealized depreciation and approximately $13.7 million relating to the reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation as certain investments were realized. The most significant changes in net unrealized appreciation and depreciation during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were as follows (in millions):


Portfolio Company	Unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
Falcon Communications, Inc.	$	9.5
Palm, Inc.		4.8
Segovia, Inc.		3.8
Punch Software LLC		3.1
AKQA, Inc.		2.9


Portfolio Company	Unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
Questia Media, Inc.		2.9
Cavtel Holdings, LLC		2.3
Hyland Software, Inc.		2.0
GXS Worldwide Inc.		1.8
Netquote, Inc.		1.7
Power Tools, Inc.		1.4
Fusionstorm, Inc.		1.2
Workflow Management, Inc.		1.2
SCS Holdings II, Inc.		1.0
Stratus Technologies, Inc.		0.7
First Data Corporation		0.6
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc.		(0.5	)
The CAPS Group		(1.4	)
American Integration Technologies, LLC		(2.1	)
Box Services, LLC		(4.7	)
WAICCS Las Vegas, LLC		(6.9	)
Net all other		1.8

Total	$	27.1

Please see “—Portfolio Grading” above for more information.

Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Net Investment Income

Net investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $17.6 million and $9.9 million, respectively. This increase was due largely to a greater return on our investment portfolio due to market discounts on new debt investments, distributions from the equity interests in our securitization vehicle investments as well as an increase in the amount of performing assets in the portfolio.

Based on a weighted-average of 26,874,575 shares outstanding (basic and diluted), the net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per common share for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $0.65 for basic and diluted, compared to approximately $0.37 per share for the same period in 2009.

Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations

We had a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of approximately $40.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to a net increase of approximately $23.3 million for the comparable period in 2009. This net increase in net assets was attributable to greater net unrealized appreciation on investments and increased net investment income, partially offset by net realized losses on investments.

Based on a weighted-average of 26,874,575 shares outstanding (basic and diluted), the net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $1.49 for basic and diluted, compared to a net increase in net assets of approximately $0.88 per share for the same period in 2009.

Please see “—Portfolio Grading” above for more information.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, cash and cash equivalents decreased from approximately $24.0 million at the beginning of the period to approximately $13.1 million at the end of the period. Net cash used by operating activities for the period, consisting primarily of the items described in “—Results of Operations,” was approximately $3.0 million, largely reflecting net investment income (approximately $17.6 million) as well as proceeds from principal repayments and sales of investments (approximately $89.3 million), offset by the purchases of new investments (approximately $99.0 million). During the period, net cash used in financing activities was approximately $13.8 million reflecting the distribution of dividends.

Share Repurchase Program

On July 30, 2009, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program which provides for the purchase of up to $10 million worth of shares to be implemented at the discretion of our management team. Under the repurchase program, we may, but are not obligated to, repurchase our outstanding common stock in the open market from time to time. The timing and number of shares to be repurchased in the open market will depend on a number of factors, including market conditions and alternative investment opportunities. In addition, any repurchases will be conducted in accordance with the 1940 Act.

Contractual Obligations

We have certain obligations with respect to the investment advisory and administration services we receive. See “–Overview”. We incurred approximately $4.7 million for investment advisory services and $603,000 for administrative services for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

As of September 30, 2010, we had a commitment outstanding to purchase an additional debt investment of approximately $909,100 on our debt investment in Birch Communications, Inc.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements, including any risk management of commodity pricing or other hedging practices.

Borrowings

We currently have no borrowings.

Distributions

In order to qualify as a regulated investment company and to avoid corporate level tax on the income we distribute to our stockholders, we are required, under Subchapter M of the Code, to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and short-term capital gains to our stockholders on an annual basis.

The following table reflects the cash distributions, including dividends and returns of capital, if any, per share that we have declared on our common stock to date:

Date Declared

Record Date

Payment Date

Amount

Fiscal 2010

November 2, 2010

December 10, 2010

December 31, 2010

0.24

July 29, 2010

September 10, 2010

September 30, 2010

0.22

April 29, 2010

June 10, 2010

June 30, 2010

0.20

March 4, 2010

March 24, 2010

March 31, 2010

0.15

Total (2010)

0.81

Fiscal 2009

October 29, 2009

December 10, 2009

December 31, 2009

0.15

July 30, 2009

September 10, 2009

September 30, 2009

0.15

May 5, 2009

June 10, 2009

June 30, 2009

0.15

March 5, 2009

March 17, 2009

March 31, 2009

0.15

Total (2009)

0.60

⁽¹⁾

Fiscal 2008

October 30, 2008

December 10, 2008

December 31, 2008

0.20

July 31, 2008

September 10, 2008

September 30, 2008

0.20

May 1, 2008

June 16, 2008

June 30, 2008

0.30

March 11, 2008

March 21, 2008

March 31, 2008

0.36

Total (2008)

1.06

⁽²⁾

Fiscal 2007

October 25, 2007

December 10, 2007

December 31, 2007

0.36

July 26, 2007

September 7, 2007

September 28, 2007

0.36

April 30, 2007

June 8, 2007

June 29, 2007

0.36

February 27, 2007

March 9, 2007

March 30, 2007

0.36

Total (2007)

1.44

⁽³⁾

Fiscal 2006

December 20, 2006

December 29, 2006

January 17, 2007

0.12

October 26, 2006

December 8, 2006

December 29, 2006

0.34

July 26, 2006

September 8, 2006

September 29, 2006

0.32

April 26, 2006

June 9, 2006

June 30, 2006

0.30

February 9, 2006

March 10, 2006

March 31, 2006

0.30

Total (2006)

1.38

Fiscal 2005

December 7, 2005

December 30, 2005

January 18, 2006

0.12

October 27, 2005

December 9, 2005

December 30, 2005

0.30

July 27, 2005

September 10, 2005

September 30, 2005

0.25

April 27, 2005

June 10, 2005

June 30, 2005

0.20

February 9, 2005

March 10, 2005

March 31, 2005

0.14

Total (2005)

1.01

Fiscal 2004

October 27, 2004

December 10, 2004

December 31, 2004

0.11

July 28, 2004

September 10, 2004

September 30, 2004

0.11

May 5, 2004

June 10, 2004

June 30, 2004

0.11

February 2, 2004

March 15, 2004

April 5, 2004

0.10

Total (2004)

0.43

⁽⁴⁾

Total Distributions:

6.73

⁽⁵⁾

⁽¹⁾	Distributions for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 were funded from undistributed net investment income.

⁽²⁾	Includes a return of capital of approximately $0.08 per share for tax purposes.

⁽³⁾	Includes a return of capital of approximately $0.02 per share for tax purposes.

⁽⁴⁾	Includes a return of capital of approximately $0.10 per share for tax purposes.

⁽⁵⁾	We did not declare a dividend for the period ended December 31, 2003.

Related Parties

We have a number of business relationships with affiliated or related parties, including the following:

•

We have entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with TICC Management. TICC Management is controlled by BDC Partners, its managing member. In addition to BDC Partners, TICC Management is owned by Royce & Associates as the non-managing member. BDC Partners, as the managing member of TICC Management, manages the business and internal affairs of TICC Management. In addition, BDC Partners provides us with office facilities and administrative services pursuant to the Administration Agreement.

•

Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal currently serve as Chief Executive Officer and President, respectively, for T2 Advisers, LLC, an investment adviser to Greenwich Loan Income Fund Limited (f/k/a T2 Income Fund Limited) (“GLIF”), a Guernsey fund, established and operated for the purpose of investing in bilateral transactions and syndicated loans across a variety of industries globally. BDC Partners is the managing member of T2 Advisers, LLC. In addition, Mr. Conroy serves as the Chief Financial Officer of GLIF and the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Treasurer of T2 Advisers, LLC.

•

BDC Partners is the managing member of Oxford Gate Capital, LLC, a private fund in which Messrs. Cohen, Rosenthal and Conroy, along with certain investment and administrative personnel of TICC Management, are invested.

Both we and GLIF have adopted a policy with respect to the allocation of investment opportunities in view of these potential conflicts of interest. Bilateral investment opportunities are those negotiated directly between us or GLIF and a prospective portfolio company. Our general policy is to allocate bilateral U.S.-based opportunities to us and bilateral non-U.S.-based opportunities to GLIF; provided, that in instances involving bilateral investment opportunities where there is significant question as to a prospective portfolio company’s primary base of operation (by virtue, for instance, of it conducting business in many countries, including the United States, with no clear principal center of operation or legal domicile), and where that question leads to doubt with regard to an investment in that company representing a “qualified asset” for the purpose of compliance with the “70% test” for qualifying assets for BDCs under Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, that bilateral investment opportunity will be allocated to GLIF.

Either we or GLIF may also purchase syndicated loans (i.e., those transactions in which an agent bank syndicates loans to four or more investors) of issuers in which the other fund holds no position, or has held a position (and has made no further investment) for a period greater than 30 calendar days and the purchases are not made directly from the other fund or the issuer of the acquired syndicated loans. In instances where both we and GLIF desire to either purchase or sell the same position at the same time, such purchases or sales will generally be allocated on a pro rata basis between us and GLIF based on order size as determined by each fund’s investment adviser in good faith.

Notwithstanding the foregoing policy with respect to the allocation of investment opportunities, any opportunity to invest a sum of less than or equal to $500,000 (an amount generally considered below our or GLIF’s minimum investment threshold) will be allocated to Oxford Gate Capital, LLC.

In the ordinary course of business, we may enter into transactions with portfolio companies that may be considered related party transactions. In order to ensure that we do not engage in any prohibited transactions with any persons affiliated with us, we have implemented certain policies and procedures whereby our executive officers screen each of our transactions for any possible affiliations between the proposed portfolio investment, us, companies controlled by us and our employees and directors. We will not enter into any agreements unless and until we are satisfied that doing so will not raise concerns under the 1940 Act or, if such concerns exist, we have taken appropriate actions to seek board review and approval or exemptive relief for such transaction. Our Board of Directors reviews these procedures on an annual basis.

We have also adopted a Code of Ethics which applies to, among others, our senior officers, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as all of our officers, directors and employees. Our Code of Ethics requires that all employees and directors avoid any conflict, or the appearance of a conflict, between an individual’s personal interests and our interests. Pursuant to our Code of Ethics, each employee and director must disclose any conflicts of interest, or actions or relationships that might give rise to a conflict, to our Chief Compliance Officer. Our Audit Committee is charged with approving any waivers under our Code of Ethics. As required by the NASDAQ Global Select Market corporate governance listing standards, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is also required to review and approve any transactions with related parties (as such term is defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K).

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

On October 22, 2010, we sold our debt investment in Workflow Management, Inc., $5,632,355 in principal, at a price of 93.5% of par. The transaction is expected to settle within 20 days of the trade date.

On November 2, 2010, the Board of Directors declared a distribution of $0.24 per share for the fourth quarter, payable on December 31, 2010 to shareholders of record as of December 10, 2010.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. As of September 30, 2010, three debt investments in our portfolio were at a fixed rate, and the remaining forty-six debt investments were at variable rates, representing approximately $23.0 million and $255.7 million in principal debt, respectively. At September 30, 2010, $237.3 million of our variable rate investments were income producing. The variable rates are based upon LIBOR, and generally reset each year. We expect that future debt investments will generally be made at variable rates.

To illustrate the potential impact of a change in the underlying interest rate on our net increase in net assets resulting from operations, we have assumed a 1% increase in the underlying rate, and no other change in our portfolio as of September 30, 2010. We have also assumed no outstanding borrowings. Under this analysis, net investment income would increase approximately $2.4 million annually. Although management believes that this analysis is indicative of our existing interest rate sensitivity, it does not adjust for changes in the credit quality, size and composition of our portfolio, and other business developments, including borrowing under a credit facility, that could affect the net increase in net assets resulting from operations. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that actual results would not differ materially from the results under this hypothetical analysis.

We may in the future hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options and forward contracts. While hedging activities may insulate us against adverse changes in interest rates, they may also limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the investments in our portfolio with fixed interest rates.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

As of September 30, 2010, we, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of material information about us required to be included in periodic SEC filings.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us. From time to time, we may be a party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of our business including the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

An investment in our securities involves certain risks relating to our structure and investment objectives. The risks set forth below are not the only risks we face, and we face other risks which we have not yet identified, which we do not currently deem material or which are not yet predictable. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, our net asset value and the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS AND STRUCTURE

Any failure on our part to maintain our status as a business development company would reduce our operating flexibility.

If we do not remain a business development company, we might be regulated as a closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would subject us to substantially more regulatory restrictions under the 1940 Act and correspondingly decrease our operating flexibility.

We are dependent upon TICC Management’s key management personnel for our future success, particularly Jonathan H. Cohen and Saul B. Rosenthal.

We depend on the diligence, skill and network of business contacts of the senior management of TICC Management. The senior management, together with other investment professionals, will evaluate, negotiate, structure, close, monitor and service our investments. Our future success will depend to a significant extent on the continued service and coordination of the senior management team, particularly Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of TICC Management, and Saul B. Rosenthal, the President and Chief Operating Officer of TICC Management. Neither Mr. Cohen nor Mr. Rosenthal will devote all of their business time to our operations, and both will have other demands on their time as a result of their other activities. Neither Mr. Cohen nor Mr. Rosenthal is subject to an employment contract. The departure of either of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective.

Our financial condition and results of operations will depend on our ability to manage our existing portfolio and future growth effectively.

Our ability to achieve our investment objective will depend on our ability to manage our existing portfolio and to grow, which will depend, in turn, on our investment adviser’s ability to identify, analyze, invest in and finance companies that meet our investment criteria, and our ability to raise and retain debt and equity capital. Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis is largely a function of our investment adviser’s structuring of the investment process, its ability to provide competent, attentive and efficient services to us and our access to financing on acceptable terms.

We and TICC Management, through its managing member, BDC Partners, will need to continue to hire, train, supervise and manage new employees. Failure to manage our future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.

A large number of entities compete with us to make the types of investments that we make. We compete with a large number of private equity and venture capital funds, other equity and non-equity based investment funds, including other business development companies, investment banks and other sources of financing, including traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks and specialty finance companies. Many of our competitors are substantially larger than us and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a business development company. There can be no assurance that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time, and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our investment objective.

Our business model depends upon the development and maintenance of strong referral relationships with private equity and venture capital funds and investment banking firms.

If we fail to maintain our relationships with key firms, or if we fail to establish strong referral relationships with other firms or other sources of investment opportunities, we will not be able to grow our portfolio of loans and achieve our investment objective. In addition, persons with whom we have informal relationships are not obligated to provide us with investment opportunities, and therefore there is no assurance that such relationships will lead to the origination of debt or other investments.

We may not realize gains from our equity investments.

When we invest in debt securities, we may acquire warrants or other equity securities as well. However, the equity interests we receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience.

Because our investments are generally not in publicly traded securities, there is uncertainty regarding the fair value of our investments, which could adversely affect the determination of our net asset value.

Our portfolio investments are generally not in publicly traded securities. As a result, the fair value of these securities is not readily determinable. We value these securities at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors based upon the recommendation of the Board’s Valuation Committee. In connection with that determination, members of TICC Management’s portfolio management team prepare portfolio company valuations using the most recent portfolio company financial statements and forecasts. We utilize the services of a third party valuation firm which prepares valuations for each of our bilateral portfolio securities that, when combined with all other investments in the same portfolio company (i) have a value as of the previous quarter of greater than or equal to 2.5% of our total assets as of the previous quarter, and (ii) have a value as of the current quarter of greater than or equal to 2.5% of our total assets as of the previous quarter, after taking into account any repayment of principal during the current quarter. In addition, the frequency of the third party valuations of our bilateral portfolio securities is based upon the grade assigned to each such security under our credit grading system as follows: Grade 1, at least annually; Grade 2, at least semi-annually; Grades 3, 4, and 5, at least quarterly.

TICC Management also retains the authority to seek, on our behalf, additional third party valuations with respect to both our bilateral portfolio securities and our syndicated loan investments. The Board of Directors retains ultimate authority as to the third-party review cycle as well as the appropriate valuation of each investment. The types of factors that the Valuation Committee takes into account in providing its fair value recommendation to the Board of Directors includes, as relevant, the nature and value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison to valuations of publicly traded companies, comparisons to recent sales of comparable companies, the discounted value of the cash flows of the portfolio company and other relevant factors. Because such valuations are inherently uncertain and may be based on estimates, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would be assessed if a readily available market for these securities existed.

The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.

As stated above, our investments are generally not in publicly traded securities. Substantially all of these securities are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises. Also, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded our investments.

In addition, because we generally invest in debt securities with a term of up to seven years and generally intend to hold such investments until maturity of the debt, we do not expect realization events, if any, to occur in the near-term. We expect that our holdings of equity securities may require several years to appreciate in value, and we can offer no assurance that such appreciation will occur.

We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.

We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of factors, including the rate at which we make new investments, the interest rates payable on the debt securities we acquire, the default rate on such securities, the level of our expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.

We are currently in a period of capital markets disruption and we do not expect these conditions to improve in the near future.

The U.S. capital markets have been experiencing high levels of volatility and disruption for more than two years, and the U.S. economy may still be in a period of recession or slow growth. Disruptions in the capital markets have increased the spreads between the yields realized on risk-free and higher risk securities, resulting in illiquidity in parts of the capital markets. We believe these conditions may continue for a prolonged period of time or worsen in the future. A prolonged period of market illiquidity may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Unfavorable economic conditions could also increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. These events could limit our investment originations, limit our ability to grow and negatively impact our operating results.

The current adverse economic conditions could impair our portfolio companies and harm our operating results.

Many of the companies in which we have made or will make investments may be susceptible to the current adverse economic conditions, which may affect the ability of a company to repay our loans or engage in a liquidity event such as a sale, recapitalization, or initial public offering. Therefore, our nonperforming assets may increase, and the value of our portfolio may decrease during this period. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the value of any collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our equity investments. The current adverse economic conditions could lead to financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in our revenues, net income, and the value of our assets. Since 2008, we have experienced significant losses on our portfolio investments, which was in part attributable to the current adverse economic conditions in the industries in which those portfolio companies operate.

A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of the portfolio company’s loans and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize the portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if a portfolio company goes bankrupt, even though we may have structured our investment as senior debt or secured debt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we actually provided significant “managerial assistance,” if any, to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might re-characterize our debt holding and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors. These events could harm our financial condition and operating results.

Price declines and illiquidity in the corporate debt markets have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, the fair value of our portfolio investments, reducing our net asset value through increased net unrealized depreciation.

As a business development company, we are required to carry our investments at market value or, if no market value is ascertainable, at fair value as determined in good faith by or under the direction of our Board of Directors. Decreases in the market values or fair values of our investments are recorded as unrealized depreciation. The continuing unprecedented declines in prices and liquidity in the corporate debt markets have resulted in significant net unrealized depreciation in our portfolio, reducing our net asset value. Depending on market conditions, we could continue to incur substantial losses in future periods, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Even in the event the value of your investment declines, the management fee and, in certain circumstances, the incentive fee will still be payable.

The management fee is calculated as 2.0% of the value of our gross assets at a specific time. Accordingly, the management fee will be payable regardless of whether the value of our gross assets and/or your investment have decreased. Moreover, a portion of the incentive fee is payable if our net investment income for a calendar quarter exceeds a designated hurdle rate. This portion of the incentive fee is payable without regard to any capital gain, capital loss or unrealized depreciation that may occur during the quarter. Accordingly, this portion of our adviser’s incentive fee may also be payable notwithstanding a decline in net asset value that quarter. In addition, in the event we recognize deferred loan interest income in excess of our available capital as a result of our receipt of payment-in-kind, or “PIK” interest, we may be required to liquidate assets in order to pay a portion of the incentive fee. TICC Management, however, is not required to reimburse us for the portion of any incentive fees attributable to deferred loan interest income in the event of a subsequent default.

We may borrow money, which magnifies the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing in us.

Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and, therefore, increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. We may borrow from and issue senior debt securities to banks, insurance companies, and other lenders. Lenders of these senior securities have fixed dollar claims on our assets that are superior to the claims of our common shareholders. If the value of our assets increases, then leveraging would cause the net asset value attributable to our common stock to increase more sharply than it would have had we not leveraged. Conversely, if the value of our assets decreases, leveraging would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged. Similarly, any increase in our income in excess of interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net income to increase more than it would without the leverage, while any decrease in our income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to make common stock dividend payments. Leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique. Our ability to service any debt that we incur will depend largely on our financial performance and will be subject to prevailing economic conditions and competitive pressures. Moreover, as the management fee payable to TICC Management will be payable on our gross assets, including those assets acquired through the use of leverage, TICC Management may have a financial incentive to incur leverage which may not be consistent with our stockholders’ interests. In addition, our common stockholders will bear the burden of any increase in our expenses as a result of leverage, including any increase in the management fee payable to TICC Management.

Our portfolio is currently, and may continue to be, unlevered.

Since mid-2007, global credit and other financial markets have suffered substantial stress, volatility, illiquidity and disruption. These events have significantly diminished overall confidence in the debt and equity markets and caused increasing economic uncertainty. A further deterioration in the credit markets or a prolonged period of illiquidity without improvement could materially impair the availability of credit on commercially reasonable terms.

In view of tightened credit markets, since the end of the first quarter of 2008, and in the absence of having received a written offer for extension of our credit facility from our existing lenders, we took steps to reduce our borrowings under our credit facility and, effective December 30, 2008, we had fully repaid any amounts borrowed and terminated our credit facility. On a risk-adjusted basis, we believe that, until leverage can be obtained at appropriate pricing and terms with a longer maturity that more closely matches the maturity of our investments, we are better served by having an unlevered portfolio. However, as a result of de-levering our portfolio, our net investment income is now and will continue to be less than it might otherwise be on a more fully levered portfolio.

An extended continuation of the disruption in the capital markets and the credit markets could negatively affect our business.

As a business development company, we seek to maintain our ability to raise additional capital for investment purposes. Without sufficient access to the capital markets or credit markets, we may not be able to pursue new business opportunities. Ongoing disruptive conditions in the financial industry and the impact of new legislation in response to those conditions could restrict our business operations and could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Our ability to grow our business could be impaired by an inability to access the capital markets or to enter into new credit facilities. Reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets, many lenders and institutional investors have reduced or ceased providing funding to borrowers. This market turmoil and tightening of credit have led to increased market volatility and widespread reduction of business activity generally. If we are unable to raise additional equity capital or consummate new credit facilities on terms that are acceptable to us, we may not be able to initiate significant originations.

These situations may arise due to circumstances that we may be unable to control, such as access to the credit markets, a severe decline in the value of the U.S. dollar, a further economic downturn or an operational problem that affects third parties or us, and could materially damage our business. Moreover, we are unable to predict when economic and market conditions may become more favorable. Even if such conditions improve broadly and significantly over the long term, adverse conditions in particular sectors of the financial markets could adversely impact our business.

Regulations governing our operation as a business development company affect our ability to, and the way in which we raise additional capital, which may expose us to risks, including the typical risks associated with leverage.

Our ability to grow our business requires a substantial amount of capital, which we may acquire from the following sources:

Senior Securities and Other Indebtedness

We may issue debt securities or preferred stock and/or borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which we refer to collectively as “senior securities,” up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a business development company, to issue senior securities in amounts such that our asset coverage ratio, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% of gross assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, after each issuance of senior securities. This requirement of sustaining a 200% asset coverage ratio limits the amount that we may borrow. Because we will continue to need capital to grow our loan and investment portfolio, this limitation may prevent us from incurring debt. Further additional debt financing may not be available on favorable terms, if at all, or may be restricted by the terms of our debt facilities. If we are unable to incur additional debt, we may be required to raise additional equity at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so.

As a result of the issuance of senior securities, including preferred stock and debt securities, we are exposed to typical risks associated with leverage, including an increased risk of loss and an increase in expenses, which are ultimately borne by our common stockholders. Because we incur leverage to make investments, a decrease in the value of our investments would have a greater negative impact on the value of our common stock. When we issue debt securities or preferred stock, it is likely that such securities will be governed by an indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting our operating flexibility. In addition, such securities may be rated by rating agencies, and in obtaining a rating for such securities, we may be required to abide by operating and investment guidelines that could further restrict our operating flexibility.

Our ability to pay dividends or issue additional senior securities would be restricted if our asset coverage ratio was not at least 200%. If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this test. If that happens, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our leverage, repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous. Furthermore, any amounts that we use to service our indebtedness would not be available for distributions to our common stockholders.

Common Stock

We are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the then-current net asset value of our common stock if our Board of Directors determines that such sale is in the best interests of TICC and its stockholders, and our stockholders approve such sale. In certain limited circumstances, pursuant to an SEC staff interpretation, we may also issue shares at a price below net asset value in connection with a transferable rights offering so long as: (1) the offer does not discriminate among shareholders; (2) we use our best efforts to ensure an adequate trading market exists for the rights; and (3) the ratio of the offering does not exceed one new share for each three rights held. If we raise additional funds by issuing more common stock or senior securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, our common stock, the percentage ownership of our stockholders at that time would decrease and they may experience dilution. Moreover, we can offer no assurance that we will be able to issue and sell additional equity securities in the future, on favorable terms or at all.

Our Board of Directors is authorized to reclassify any unissued shares of stock into one or more classes of preferred stock, which could convey special rights and privileges to its owners.

Our charter permits our Board of Directors to reclassify any authorized but unissued shares of stock into one or more classes of preferred stock. We are currently authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 26,989,408 shares are issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2010. In the event our Board of Directors opts to reclassify a portion of our unissued shares of common stock into a class of preferred stock, those preferred shares would have a preference over our common stock with respect to dividends and liquidation. The cost of any such reclassification would be borne by our existing common stockholders. The class voting rights of any preferred shares we may issue could make it more difficult for us to take some actions that may, in the future, be proposed by the Board of Directors and/or the holders of our common stock, such as a merger, exchange of securities, liquidation, or alteration of the rights of a class of our securities, if these actions were perceived by the holders of preferred shares as not in their best interests. The issuance of preferred shares convertible into shares of common stock might also reduce the net income and net asset value per share of our common stock upon conversion. These effects, among others, could have an adverse effect on your investment in our common stock.

A change in interest rates may adversely affect our profitability.

Currently, we do not have a credit facility in place and do not have any other outstanding borrowings. However, to the extent we employ leverage in the future, a portion of our income will depend upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the interest rate on the debt securities in which we invest.

Currently, only three of our debt investments are at a fixed rate, while the others are at variable rates. Although we have not done so in the past, we may in the future choose to hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options and forward contracts, subject to applicable legal requirements. These activities may limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the hedged portfolio. Adverse developments resulting from changes in interest rates or hedging transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, we have limited experience in entering into hedging transactions, and we will initially have to purchase or develop such expertise if we choose to employ hedging strategies in the future.

We will be subject to corporate-level income tax if we are unable to qualify as a RIC.

To remain entitled to the tax benefits accorded to RICs under the Code, we must meet certain income source, asset diversification and annual distribution requirements. In order to qualify as a RIC, we must derive each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities loans, gains from the sale of stock or other securities, or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock or securities. The annual distribution requirement for a RIC is satisfied if we distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to our stockholders on an annual basis. Because we may use debt financing in the future, we may be subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the 1940 Act and financial covenants under loan and credit agreements that could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary to satisfy the annual distribution requirement. If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for special tax treatment as a RIC and, thus, may be subject to corporate-level income tax on all of our income. To qualify as a RIC, we must also meet certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each calendar quarter. Failure to meet these tests may result in our having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments will be in private companies, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and may result in substantial losses. If we fail to qualify as a RIC for any reason and remain or become subject to corporate income tax, the resulting corporate taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount of our distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on us and our stockholders.

We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income.

For federal income tax purposes, we will include in income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original issue discount, which may arise if we receive warrants in connection with the making of a loan or possibly in other circumstances, or contracted PIK interest, which represents contractual interest added to the loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. We also may be required to include in income certain other amounts that we will not receive in cash.

Because in certain cases we may recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty satisfying the annual distribution requirement applicable to RICs. Accordingly, we may have to sell some of our investments at times we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce new investments to meet these distribution requirements. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus be subject to corporate-level income tax.

There are significant potential conflicts of interest, which could impact our investment returns.

In the course of our investing activities, we pay management and incentive fees to TICC Management, and reimburse BDC Partners for certain expenses it incurs. As a result, investors in our common stock invest on a “gross” basis and receive distributions on a “net” basis after expenses, resulting in, among other things, a lower rate of return than one might achieve through direct investments. As a result of this arrangement, there may be times when the management team of TICC Management has interests that differ from those of our stockholders, giving rise to a conflict.

TICC Management receives a quarterly incentive fee based, in part, on our “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income,” if any, for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. This incentive fee is subject to a quarterly hurdle rate before providing an incentive fee return to TICC Management. To the extent we or TICC Management are able to exert influence over our portfolio companies, the quarterly pre-incentive fee may provide TICC Management with an incentive to induce our portfolio companies to accelerate or defer interest or other obligations owed to us from one calendar quarter to another.

In addition, our executive officers and directors, and the executive officers of TICC Management, and its managing member, BDC Partners, serve or may serve as officers and directors of entities that operate in a line of business similar to our own. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us or our stockholders. Charles M. Royce, the non-executive Chairman of our Board of Directors, is the President and Chief Investment Officer of Royce & Associates, the non-managing member of our investment adviser. BDC Partners is the managing member of Oxford Gate Capital, LLC, a private fund in which Messrs. Cohen, Rosenthal and Conroy, along with certain investment and administrative personnel of TICC Management, are invested.

Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal also currently serve as Chief Executive Officer and President, respectively, for T2 Advisers, LLC, an investment adviser to Greenwich Loan Income Fund Limited (f/k/a T2 Income Fund Limited) (“GLIF”), a Guernsey fund, established and operated for the purpose of investing in bilateral transactions and syndicated loans across a variety of industries globally. BDC Partners is the managing member of T2 Advisers, LLC. In addition, Patrick F. Conroy, the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary of TICC Management, BDC Partners, and TICC, serves as the Chief Financial Officer of GLIF and as the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Treasurer of T2 Advisers, LLC. Because of these possible conflicts of interest, these individuals may direct potential business and investment opportunities to other entities rather than to us or such individuals may undertake or otherwise engage in activities or conduct on behalf of such other entities that is not in, or which may be adverse to, our best interests.

that might give rise to a conflict, to our Chief Compliance Officer. Our Audit Committee is charged with approving any waivers under our Code of Ethics. As required by the NASDAQ Global Select Market corporate governance listing standards, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is also required to review and approve any transactions with related parties (as such term is defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K).

Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely affect our business.

We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation by laws at the local, state and federal levels. These laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, may be changed from time to time. Any change in these laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business. In particular, legislative initiatives relating to climate change, healthcare reform and similar public policy matters may impact the portfolio companies in which we invest to the extent they operate in industries that may be subject to such changes.

If we do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could fail to qualify as a business development company or be precluded from investing according to our current business strategy.

As a business development company, we may not acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets. See “Business—Regulation as a Business Development Company.”

We believe that most of our portfolio investments will constitute qualifying assets. However, we may be precluded from investing in what we believe are attractive investments if such investments are not qualifying assets for purposes of the 1940 Act. If we do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could lose our status as a business development company, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Similarly, these rules could prevent us from making follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies (which could result in the dilution of our position) or could require us to dispose of investments at inappropriate times in order to comply with the 1940 Act. If we need to dispose of such investments quickly, it would be difficult to dispose of such investments on favorable terms. For example, we may have difficulty in finding a buyer and, even if we do find a buyer, we may have to sell the investments at a substantial loss.

Provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law and of our charter and bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.

Our charter and bylaws, as well as certain statutory and regulatory requirements, contain certain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us. These anti-takeover provisions may inhibit a change of control in circumstances that could give the holders of our common stock the opportunity to realize a premium over the market price for our common stock.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR INVESTMENTS

Our portfolio may be concentrated in a limited number of portfolio companies, which will subject us to a risk of significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its obligations under any of its debt securities that we hold or if the sectors in which we invest experience a market downturn.

A consequence of our limited number of investments is that the aggregate returns we realize may be significantly adversely affected if a small number of investments perform poorly or if we need to write down the value of any one investment. Beyond our income tax asset diversification requirements, we do not have fixed guidelines for diversification, and our investments could be concentrated in relatively few issuers. On December 3, 2007, we changed our name from Technology Investment Capital Corp. to TICC Capital Corp. While we have historically focused on the technology sector, we expect to actively seek new investment opportunities outside this sector that otherwise meet our investment criteria. As a result, a market downturn, including a downturn in the sectors in which we invest, could materially adversely affect us.

The sectors in which we invest are subject to many risks, including volatility, intense competition, decreasing life cycles and periodic downturns.

We invest in companies which may have relatively short operating histories. The revenues, income (or losses) and valuations of these companies can and often do fluctuate suddenly and dramatically. Also, the technology-related sector, on which we have historically focused, in particular, is generally characterized by abrupt business cycles and intense competition. The cyclical economic downturn has resulted in substantial decreases in the market capitalization of many companies. While such valuations have recovered to some extent, we can offer no assurance that such decreases in market capitalizations will not recur, or that any future decreases in valuations will be insubstantial or temporary in nature. Therefore, our portfolio companies may face considerably more risk of loss than companies in other industry sectors.

In addition, because of rapid technological change, the average selling prices of products and some services provided by the technology-related sector, on which we have historically focused, have historically decreased over their productive lives. As a result, the average selling prices of products and services offered by some of our portfolio companies may decrease over time, which could adversely affect their operating results and their ability to meet their obligations under their debt securities, as well as the value of any equity securities, that we may hold. This could, in turn, materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our investments in the companies that we are targeting may be extremely risky and we could lose all or part of our investments.

Although a prospective portfolio company’s assets are one component of our analysis when determining whether to provide debt capital, we generally do not base most of our investment decisions primarily on the liquidation value of a company’s balance sheet assets. Instead, given the nature of many of the companies that we invest in, we also review the company’s historical and projected cash flows, equity capital and “soft” assets, including intellectual property (patented and non-patented), databases, business relationships (both contractual and non-contractual) and the like. Accordingly, considerably higher levels of overall risk will likely be associated with our portfolio compared with that of a traditional asset-based lender whose security consists primarily of receivables, inventories, equipment and other tangible assets. Interest rates payable by our portfolio companies may not compensate for these additional risks.

Specifically, investment in certain of the companies that we are invested in involves a number of significant risks, including:

•

these companies may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet their obligations under their debt securities that we hold, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any collateral and a reduction in the likelihood of us realizing any value from the liquidation of such collateral;

•

they may have limited operating histories, narrower product lines and smaller market shares than larger businesses, which may tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors’ actions and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns;

•

because many of them tend to be privately owned, there is generally little publicly available information about these businesses; therefore, although TICC Management’s agents will perform “due diligence” investigations on these portfolio companies, their operations and their prospects, we may not learn all of the material information we need to know regarding these businesses;

•

some of these companies are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons; therefore, the death, disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on our portfolio company and, in turn, on us;

•

some of these companies may have less predictable operating results, may from time to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence, and may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive position; and

•

many of these companies may be more susceptible to the current adverse economic conditions than other better capitalized companies that operate in less capital intensive industries.

A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and foreclosure on its assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize our portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if a portfolio company goes bankrupt, even though we may have structured our interest as senior debt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we actually provided significant “managerial assistance” to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might recharacterize our debt holding and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors.

Our failure to make follow-on investments in our portfolio companies could impair the value of our portfolio.

Following an initial investment in a portfolio company, we may make additional investments in that portfolio company as “follow-on” investments, in order to: (i) increase or maintain in whole or in part our equity ownership percentage; (ii) exercise warrants, options or convertible securities that were acquired in the original or subsequent financing; or (iii) attempt to preserve or enhance the value of our investment.

We may elect not to make follow-on investments or otherwise lack sufficient funds to make those investments. We have the discretion to make any follow-on investments, subject to the availability of capital resources. The failure to make follow-on investments may, in some circumstances, jeopardize the continued viability of a portfolio company and our initial investment, or may result in a missed opportunity for us to increase our participation in a successful operation. Even if we have sufficient capital to make a desired follow-on investment, we may elect not to make a follow-on investment because we may not want to increase our concentration of risk, because we prefer other opportunities, or because we are inhibited by compliance with business development company requirements or the desire to maintain our tax status.

Our incentive fee may induce TICC Management to make speculative investments.

The incentive fee payable by us to TICC Management may create an incentive for TICC Management to make investments on our behalf that are risky or more speculative than would be the case in the absence of such compensation arrangement. The way in which the incentive fee on “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” is determined, which is calculated as a percentage of the return

on invested capital, may encourage TICC Management to use leverage to increase the return on our investments. Under certain circumstances, the use of leverage may increase the likelihood of default, which would disfavor holders of our common stock. Similarly, because TICC Management may also receive an incentive fee based, in part, upon the capital gains realized on our investments, the investment adviser may invest more than would otherwise be appropriate in companies whose securities are likely to yield capital gains, as compared to income producing securities. Such a practice could result in our investing in more speculative securities than would otherwise be the case, which could result in higher investment losses, particularly during the current economic downturn.

Our portfolio companies may incur debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies.

We intend to invest primarily in senior debt securities, but may also invest in subordinated debt securities, issued by our portfolio companies. In some cases portfolio companies will be permitted to have other debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, the debt securities in which we invest. By their terms, such debt instruments may provide that the holders thereof are entitled to receive payment of interest or principal on or before the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments in respect of the debt securities in which we invest. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of debt instruments ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution in respect of our investment. After repaying such senior creditors, such portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligations to us. In the case of debt ranking equally with debt securities in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other creditors holding such debt in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company. In addition, we will not be in a position to control any portfolio company by investing in its debt securities. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company in which we invest may make business decisions with which we disagree and the management of such companies, as representatives of the holders of their common equity, may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not best serve our interests as debt investors.

Because we generally do not hold controlling equity interests in our portfolio companies, we may not be in a position to exercise control over our portfolio companies or to prevent decisions by the managements of our portfolio companies that could decrease the value of our investments.

Although we have taken and may in the future take controlling equity positions in our portfolio companies from time to time, we generally do not do so. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company may make business decisions with which we disagree, and the stockholders and management of a portfolio company may take risks or otherwise act in ways that are adverse to our interests. Due to the lack of liquidity for the debt and equity investments that we typically hold in our portfolio companies, we may not be able to dispose of our investments in the event we disagree with the actions of a portfolio company, and may therefore suffer a decrease in the value of our investments.

Our investments in collateralized loan obligation vehicles may be riskier and less transparent than direct investments in portfolio companies.

From time to time we have and may invest in debt and residual value interests of collateralized loan obligation, or “CLO,” vehicles. Generally, there may be less information available to us regarding the underlying debt investments held by such CLOs than if we had invested directly in the underlying companies. Our CLO investments will also be subject to the risk of leverage associated with the debt issued by such CLOs and the repayment priority of debt holders senior to us in such CLOs.

Some instruments issued by CLO vehicles may not be readily marketable and may be subject to restrictions on resale. Securities issued by CLO vehicles are generally not listed on any U.S. national securities exchange and no active trading market may exist for the securities of CLO vehicles in which we may invest. Although a secondary market may exist for our investments in CLO vehicles, the market for our investments in CLO vehicles may be subject to irregular trading activity, wide bid/ask spreads and extended trade settlement periods. As a result, these types of investments may be more difficult to value.

Failure by a CLO vehicle in which we are invested to satisfy certain tests will harm our operating results.

The failure by a CLO vehicle in which we invest to satisfy financial covenants, including with respect to adequate collateralization and/or interest coverage tests, could lead to a reduction in its payments to us. In the event that a CLO vehicle fails certain tests, holders of debt senior to us may be entitled to additional payments that would, in turn, reduce the payments we would otherwise be entitled to receive. Separately, we may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms, with a defaulting CLO vehicle or any other investment we may make. If any of these occur, it could materially and adversely affect our operating results and cash flows.

Our financial results may be affected adversely if one or more of our significant equity or junior debt investments in such CLO vehicles defaults on its payment obligations or fails to perform as we expect.

Up to 30% of our portfolio may consist of equity and junior debt investments in CLO vehicles, which involves a number of significant risks. CLO vehicles that we invest in are typically very highly levered (10-14 times), and therefore the junior debt and

equity tranches that we invest in are subject to a higher degree of risk of total loss. In particular, investors in CLO vehicles indirectly bear risks of the underlying debt investments held by such CLO vehicles. We will generally have the right to receive payments only from the CLO vehicles, and will generally not have direct rights against the underlying borrowers or the entity that sponsored the CLO vehicle. While the CLO vehicles we have and continue to target generally enable the investor to acquire interests in a pool of leveraged corporate loans without the expenses associated with directly holding the same investments, when we invest in an equity tranche of a CLO vehicle we will generally pay a proportionate share of the CLO vehicles’ administrative and other expenses. Although it is difficult to predict whether the prices of indices and securities underlying CLO vehicles will rise or fall, these prices (and, therefore, the prices of the CLO vehicles) will be influenced by the same types of political and economic events that affect issuers of securities and capital markets generally.

The interests we intend to acquire in CLO vehicles will likely be thinly traded or have only a limited trading market. CLO vehicles are typically privately offered and sold, even in the secondary market. As a result, investments in CLO vehicles may be characterized as illiquid securities. In addition to the general risks associated with investing in debt securities, CLO vehicles carry additional risks, including, but not limited to: (i) the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the quality of the collateral may decline in value or default; (iii) the fact that our investments in CLO tranches will likely be subordinate to other senior classes of note tranches thereof; and (iv) the complex structure of the security may not be fully understood at the time of investment and may produce disputes with the CLO vehicle or unexpected investment results.

Investments in structured vehicles, including equity and junior debt instruments issued by CLO vehicles, involve risks, including credit risk and market risk. Changes in interest rates and credit quality may cause significant price fluctuations. Additionally, changes in the underlying leveraged corporate loans held by a CLO vehicle may cause payments on the instruments we hold to be reduced, either temporarily or permanently. Structured investments, particularly the subordinated interests in which we intend to invest, are less liquid than many other types of securities and may be more volatile than the leveraged corporate loans underlying the CLO vehicles we intend to target. Fluctuations in interest rates may also cause payments on the tranches of CLO vehicles that we hold to be reduced, either temporarily or permanently.

Investments in foreign securities may involve significant risks in addition to the risks inherent in U.S. investments.

Our investment strategy involves investments in securities issued by foreign entities, including foreign CLO vehicles. Investing in foreign entities may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in U.S. issues. These risks include changes in exchange control regulations, political and social instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets and less available information than is generally the case in the United States, higher transaction costs, less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price volatility. Further, we, and the CLO vehicles in which we invest, may have difficulty enforcing creditor’s rights in foreign jurisdictions. In addition, the underlying companies of the CLO vehicles in which we invest may be foreign, which may create greater exposure for us to foreign economic developments.

Although we expect that most of our investments will be U.S. dollar-denominated, any investments denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk that the value of a particular currency will change in relation to one or more other currencies. Among the factors that may affect currency values are trade balances, the level of short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities for investment and capital appreciation, and political developments. We may employ hedging techniques to minimize these risks, but we can offer no assurance that we will, in fact, hedge currency risk, or that if we do, such strategies will be effective.

RISKS RELATED TO AN INVESTMENT IN OUR COMMON STOCK

Our common stock price may be volatile.

The trading price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially depending on many factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our operating performance. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

•

price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;

•

significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of securities of regulated investment companies, business development companies or other financial services companies;

•

changes in regulatory policies or tax guidelines with respect to regulated investment companies or business development companies;

•

actual or anticipated changes in our earnings or fluctuations in our operating results or changes in the expectations of securities analysts;

•

general economic conditions and trends;

•

loss of a major funding source; or

•

departures of key personnel.

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. Due to the potential volatility of our stock price, we may therefore be the target of securities litigation in the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources from our business.

Our shares have traded at a discount from net asset value and may do so in the future.

Shares of closed-end investment companies have frequently traded at a market price that is less than the net asset value that is attributable to those shares. In part as a result of the current adverse economic conditions and increasing pressure within the financial sector of which we are a part, our common stock consistently traded below our net asset value per share throughout 2009, and had remained below our net asset value per share for most of the first seven months of 2010. We cannot assure you that our shares will not revert to trading at a discount to net asset value. The possibility that our shares of common stock may trade at a discount from net asset value over the long term is separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value will decrease. We cannot predict whether shares of our common stock will trade above, at or below our net asset value. If our common stock trades below its net asset value, we will generally not be able to issue additional shares of our common stock at its market price without first obtaining the approval for such issuance from our stockholders and our independent directors. If additional funds are not available to us, we could be forced to curtail or cease our new lending and investment activities, and our net asset value could decrease and our level of distributions could be impacted.

There is a risk that you may not receive dividends or that our dividends may decline or that our dividends may not grow over time.

We cannot assure you that we will achieve investment results or maintain a tax status that will allow or require any specified level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions. In addition, as a result of de-levering our portfolio, our net investment income is now and will continue to be less than it might otherwise be on a more fully levered portfolio.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

While we did not engage in unregistered sales of equity securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we issued a total of 176,192 shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan. This issuance was not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. The aggregate valuation price for the shares of common stock issued under the dividend reinvestment plan was approximately $1,480,000.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

Not applicable.

ITEM 4.

RESERVED.

[Intentionally left blank]

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION.

Not applicable.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS.

(a) EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or hereby incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed with the SEC:


3.1		Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-109055), filed on September 23, 2003).

3.2		Articles of Amendment (Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 814-00638) filed December 3, 2007).

3.3		Amended and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-109055), filed on November 19, 2003).

4.1		Form of Share Certificate (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-109055), filed on September 23, 2003).

10.1		Form of Amended and Restated Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Technology Investment Management, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Registrant’s Proxy Materials on Schedule 14A (File No. 000-50398) filed on May 18, 2004).

10.2		Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company (Incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-109055), filed on November 19, 2003).

10.3		Administration Agreement between Registrant and BDC Partners, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-109055), filed on November 19, 2003).

10.4		Dividend Reinvestment Plan (Incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-109055), filed on November 6, 2003).

11		Computation of Per Share Earnings (included in the notes to the audited financial statements contained in this report).

31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*	Filed herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	TICC CAPITAL CORP.

Date: November 5, 2010	By:	/S/ JONATHAN H. COHEN
		Jonathan H. Cohen
		Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 5, 2010	By:	/S/ PATRICK F. CONROY
		Patrick F. Conroy
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Accounting Officer)