FILED PURSUANT TO RULE 424(b)(5)

REGISTRATION FILE NO.: 333-189017-11

Prospectus Supplement supplementing the Prospectus dated January 16, 2015

$879,413,000 (Approximate)

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33 

as Issuing Entity 

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. 

as Depositor

Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.

Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company 

Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC 

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC 

RAIT Funding, LLC 

as Sponsors

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC33 

The Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC33 will consist of multiple classes of certificates, including those identified on the table below which are offered pursuant to this prospectus supplement. The Series 2015-GC33 certificates will represent the beneficial ownership interests in the issuing entity, which will be Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33. The issuing entity’s main assets will be a pool of 64 fixed rate mortgage loans secured by first liens on various types of commercial and multifamily properties. 

Classes of Offered Certificates	Initial Certificate Principal Amount or Notional Amount(1)		Initial Pass- Through Rate(2)	Pass-Through Rate Description	Rated Final Distribution Date
Class A-1	$   31,785,000		1.643%	Fixed	September 2058
Class A-2	$   15,217,000		2.946%	Fixed	September 2058
Class A-3	$ 220,000,000		3.515%	Fixed	September 2058
Class A-4	$ 331,456,000		3.778%	Fixed	September 2058
Class A-AB	$  72,484,000		3.522%	Fixed	September 2058
Class X-A	$718,866,000	(5)	0.989%	Variable IO(6)	September 2058
Class A-S(7)	$  47,924,000	(8)	4.114%	Fixed	September 2058
Class B(7)	$  62,302,000	(8)	4.571%	WAC(9)	September 2058
Class PEZ(7)	$152,160,000	(8)	(11)	(11)	September 2058
Class C(7)	$  41,934,000	(8)	4.571%	WAC(9)	September 2058
Class D	$  56,311,000		3.172%	Fixed	September 2058
Class X-D	$  56,311,000	(5)	1.399%	Variable IO(6)	September 2058

(Footnotes to table begin on page S-13) 

You should carefully consider the risk factors beginning on page S-65 of this prospectus supplement and page 19 of the accompanying prospectus.  Neither the Series 2015-GC33 certificates nor the underlying mortgage loans are insured or guaranteed by any governmental agency or instrumentality or any other person or entity.    The Series 2015-GC33 certificates will represent interests in and obligations of the issuing entity and will not represent the obligations of the depositor, the sponsors or any of their affiliates. THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND STATE SECURITIES REGULATORS HAVE NOT APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES OR DETERMINED IF THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT OR THE ACCOMPANYING PROSPECTUS ARE TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. THE DEPOSITOR WILL NOT LIST THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES ON ANY SECURITIES EXCHANGE OR ANY AUTOMATED QUOTATION SYSTEM OF ANY NATIONAL SECURITIES ASSOCIATION. Distributions to holders of the certificates of amounts to which they are entitled will be made monthly, commencing in October 2015. Credit enhancement will be provided by certain classes of subordinate certificates that will be subordinate to certain classes of senior certificates as described under “Description of the Offered Certificates—Subordination” in this prospectus supplement.

The offered certificates will be offered by Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Drexel Hamilton, LLC when, as and if issued by the issuing entity, delivered to and accepted by the underwriters and subject to each underwriter’s right to reject orders in whole or in part. The underwriters will offer the offered certificates to prospective investors from time to time in negotiated transactions or otherwise at varying prices determined at the time of sale, plus, in certain cases, accrued interest, determined at the time of sale. The underwriters expect to deliver the offered certificates to purchasers in book-entry form only through the facilities of The Depository Trust Company in the United States and Clearstream Banking, société anonyme and Euroclear Bank SA/NV, as operator of the Euroclear System, in Europe against payment in New York, New York on or about September 29, 2015. Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. expects to receive from this offering approximately 106.8% of the aggregate principal balance of the offered certificates, plus accrued interest from September 1, 2015, before deducting expenses payable by the depositor.

The issuing entity will be relying on an exclusion or exemption from the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act“), contained in Section 3(c)(5) of the Investment Company Act or Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act, although there may be additional exclusions or exemptions available to the issuing entity. The issuing entity is being structured so as not to constitute a “covered fund” for purposes of the Volcker Rule under the Dodd-Frank Act (both as defined in “Risk Factors—Legal and Regulatory Provisions Affecting Investors Could Adversely Affect the Liquidity of the Offered Certificates” in this prospectus supplement). See also “Legal Investment” in this prospectus supplement.

Citigroup Goldman, Sachs & Co.

Co-Lead Managers and Joint Bookrunners

Drexel Hamilton

Co-Manager

September 14, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTIFICATE SUMMARY	S-13
SUMMARY	S-15
RISK FACTORS	S-65
The Offered Certificates May Not Be a Suitable Investment for You	S-65
The Offered Certificates Are Limited Obligations	S-65
The Volatile Economy, Credit Crisis and Downturn in the Real Estate Market Have Adversely Affected and May Continue to Adversely Affect the Value of CMBS	S-65
External Factors May Adversely Affect the Value and Liquidity of Your Investment	S-66
The Certificates May Have Limited Liquidity and the Market Value of the Certificates May Decline	S-67
The Exchangeable Certificates Are Subject to Additional Risks	S-68
Subordination of Exchangeable Certificates	S-68
Limited Information Causes Uncertainty	S-69
Legal and Regulatory Provisions Affecting Investors Could Adversely Affect the Liquidity of the Offered Certificates	S-69
Your Yield May Be Affected by Defaults,Prepayments and Other Factors	S-71
Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations May Assign Different Ratings to the Certificates; Ratings of the Certificates Reflect Only the Views of the Applicable Rating Agencies as of the Dates Such Ratings Were Issued; Ratings May Affect ERISA Eligibility; Ratings May Be Downgraded	S-74
Commercial and Multifamily Lending Is Dependent on Net Operating Income	S-75
Design Center and Showroom Building Properties Have Special Risks	S-76
Underwritten Net Cash Flow Could Be Based on Incorrect or Failed Assumptions	S-77
The Mortgage Loans Have Not Been Reunderwritten by Us; Some Mortgage Loans May Not Have Complied with Another Originator’s Underwriting Criteria	S-77
Static Pool Data Would Not Be Indicative of the Performance of This Pool	S-77
Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property	S-78

Performance of the Certificates Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases	S-79
Concentrations Based on Property Type, Geography, Related Borrowers and Other Factors May Disproportionately Increase Losses	S-81
Risks Relating to Enforceability of Cross-Collateralization	S-82
The Performance of a Mortgage Loan and Its Related Mortgaged Property Depends in Part on Who Controls the Borrower and Mortgaged Property	S-83
The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks	S-83
A Bankruptcy Proceeding May Result in Losses and Delays in Realizing on the Mortgage Loans	S-84
Mortgage Loans Are Non-Recourse and Are Not Insured or Guaranteed	S-85
Adverse Environmental Conditions at or Near Mortgaged Properties May Result in Losses	S-85
Risks Related to Redevelopment, Expansion and Renovation at Mortgaged Properties	S-85
Risks Relating to Costs of Compliance with Applicable Laws and Regulations	S-86
Litigation Regarding the Mortgaged Properties or Borrowers May Impair Your Distributions	S-86
Other Financings or Ability to Incur Other Financings Entails Risk	S-87
A Borrower May Be Unable to Repay Its Remaining Principal Balance on the Maturity Date or Anticipated Repayment Date; Longer Amortization Schedules and Interest-Only Provisions Increase Risk	S-88
Risks Relating to Interest on Advances and Special Servicing Compensation	S-89
Increases in Real Estate Taxes May Reduce Available Funds	S-89
Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses	S-90
Risks Related to Zoning Non-Compliance and Use Restrictions	S-91
Risks Relating to Inspections of Properties	S-91
Earthquake, Flood and Other Insurance May Not Be Available or Adequate	S-91
Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties	S-92
Risks Associated with Blanket Insurance Policies or Self-Insurance	S-93

S-3

State and Local Mortgage Recording Taxes May Apply Upon a Foreclosure or Deed-in-Lieu of Foreclosure and Reduce Net Proceeds	S-94
The Mortgage Loan Sellers, the Sponsors and the Depositor Are Subject to Bankruptcy or Insolvency Laws That May Affect the Issuing Entity’s Ownership of the Mortgage Loans	S-94
Interests and Incentives of the Originators, the Sponsors and Their Affiliates May Not Be Aligned with Your Interests	S-95
Interests and Incentives of the Underwriter Entities May Not Be Aligned with Your Interests	S-96
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, any Outside Servicer and any Outside Special Servicer	S-98
Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Operating Advisor	S-99
Potential Conflicts of Interest of a Directing Holder, any Outside Controlling Class Representative and any Companion Loan Holder	S-100
Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Selection of the Underlying Mortgage Loans	S-101
Conflicts of Interest May Occur as a Result of the Rights of the Controlling Class Representative, an Outside Controlling Class Representative or a Controlling Note Holder to Terminate the Special Servicer of the Related Loan Combination	S-102
Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment	S-102
Your Lack of Control Over the Issuing Entity and Servicing of the Mortgage Loans Can Create Risks	S-103
Rights of the Directing Holder and the Operating Advisor Could Adversely Affect Your Investment	S-104
Loan Combinations Pose Special Risks	S-105
Sponsors May Not Be Able to Make Required Repurchases or Substitutions of Defective Mortgage Loans	S-107
Any Loss of Value Payment Made by a Sponsor May Prove to Be Insufficient to Cover All Losses on a Defective Mortgage Loan	S-108
Book-Entry Registration Will Mean You Will Not Be Recognized as a Holder of Record	S-108
Tax Matters and Changes in Tax Law May Adversely Impact the Mortgage Loans or Your Investment	S-108

Combination or “Layering” of Multiple Risks May Significantly Increase Risk of Loss	S-109
DESCRIPTION OF THE MORTGAGE POOL	S-110
General	S-110
Certain Calculations and Definitions	S-112
Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans	S-120
Environmental Considerations	S-133
Litigation Considerations	S-136
Redevelopment, Expansion and Renovation	S-138
Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings	S-139
Tenant Issues	S-140
Insurance Considerations	S-150
Zoning and Use Restrictions	S-151
Appraised Value	S-152
Non-Recourse Carveout Limitations	S-152
Real Estate and Other Tax Considerations	S-152
Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans	S-153
The Loan Combinations	S-161
Significant Obligor	S-179
Representations and Warranties	S-179
Sale of Mortgage Loans; Mortgage File Delivery	S-180
Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions	S-181
Additional Information	S-184
TRANSACTION PARTIES	S-185
The Sponsors	S-185
Compensation of the Sponsors	S-198
The Depositor	S-198
The Originators	S-199
The Issuing Entity	S-217
The Trustee	S-218
The Certificate Administrator	S-220
Trustee and Certificate Administrator Fee	S-223
The Operating Advisor	S-223
Servicers	S-224
Servicing Compensation, Operating Advisor Compensation and Payment of Expenses	S-231
Certain Affiliations and Certain Relationships	S-240
DESCRIPTION OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES	S-244
General	S-244
Exchangeable Certificates	S-247
Distributions	S-248
Subordination	S-262
Appraisal Reduction Amounts	S-263
Voting Rights	S-266
Delivery, Form, Transfer and Denomination	S-268
Certificateholder Communication	S-271
YIELD, PREPAYMENT AND MATURITY CONSIDERATIONS	S-271
Yield	S-271

S-4

Yield on the Class X-A and Class X-D Certificates	S-274
Weighted Average Life of the Offered Certificates	S-275
Price/Yield Tables	S-280
THE POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT	S-285
General	S-285
Certain Considerations Regarding the Outside Serviced Loan Combinations	S-285
Assignment of the Mortgage Loans	S-286
Servicing of the Mortgage Loans	S-286
Advances	S-291
Accounts	S-295
Application of Penalty Charges and Modification Fees	S-297
Withdrawals from the Collection Account	S-297
Enforcement of “Due-On-Sale” and “Due-On-Encumbrance” Clauses	S-298
Inspections	S-300
Evidence as to Compliance	S-300
Certain Matters Regarding the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Operating Advisor	S-301
Servicer Termination Events	S-303
Rights Upon Servicer Termination Event	S-305
Waivers of Servicer Termination Events	S-306
Termination of the Special Servicer	S-306
Amendment	S-309
Realization Upon Mortgage Loans	S-311
Directing Holder	S-320
Operating Advisor	S-326
Asset Status Reports	S-331
Rating Agency Confirmations	S-333
Termination; Retirement of Certificates	S-334
Optional Termination; Optional Mortgage Loan Purchase	S-335
Reports to Certificateholders; Available Information	S-335
Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans	S-342
USE OF PROCEEDS	S-347
MATERIAL FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES	S-348

General	S-348
Tax Status of Offered Certificates	S-348
Taxation of the Offered Regular Certificates and the Trust Components	S-349
Taxation of the Exchangeable Certificates	S-351
Further Information	S-351
STATE AND OTHER TAX CONSIDERATIONS	S-351
ERISA CONSIDERATIONS	S-352
Exempt Plans	S-355
Further Warnings	S-355
LEGAL INVESTMENT	S-356
CERTAIN LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE MORTGAGE LOANS	S-357
RATINGS	S-358
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION (UNDERWRITER CONFLICTS OF INTEREST)	S-360
LEGAL MATTERS	S-361
INDEX OF CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS	S-362
ANNEX A – STATISTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MORTGAGE LOANS	A-1
ANNEX B – STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET	B-1
ANNEX C – MORTGAGE POOL INFORMATION	C-1
ANNEX D – FORM OF DISTRIBUTION DATE STATEMENT	D-1
ANNEX E-1 – SPONSOR REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES	E-1-1
ANNEX E-2 – EXCEPTIONS TO SPONSOR REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES	E-2-1
ANNEX F – CLASS A-AB SCHEDULED PRINCIPAL BALANCE SCHEDULE	F-1
ANNEX G – GREYLYN BUSINESS PARK MORTGAGE LOAN AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE	G-1

S-5

IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS 

PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT AND THE ACCOMPANYING PROSPECTUS 

Information about the offered certificates is contained in two separate documents that progressively provide more detail: (a) the accompanying prospectus, which provides general information, some of which may not apply to the offered certificates; and (b) this prospectus supplement, which describes the specific terms of the offered certificates. The terms of the offered certificates contained in this prospectus supplement, including the annexes to this prospectus supplement, are intended to supplement the terms contained in the accompanying prospectus. 

We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to the offered certificates. This prospectus supplement does not contain all of the information contained in our registration statement, nor does it contain all information that is required to be included in a prospectus required to be filed as part of a registration statement. For further information regarding the documents referred to in this prospectus supplement, you should refer to our registration statement and the exhibits to it. Any materials we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission will be available for website viewing and printing at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains an internet website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains information we file and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from that contained in this prospectus supplement and the prospectus. The information contained in this prospectus supplement is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus supplement. 

■      This prospectus supplement begins with two introductory sections describing the Series 2015-GC33 certificates and the issuing entity in abbreviated form:

· the “Certificate Summary“ commencing on page S-13 of this prospectus supplement, which sets forth important statistical information relating to the Series 2015-GC33 certificates; and

· the “Summary“ commencing on page S-15 of this prospectus supplement, which gives a brief introduction to the key features of the Series 2015-GC33 certificates and a description of the underlying mortgage loans.

Additionally, “Risk Factors“ commencing on page S-65 of this prospectus supplement, describes the material risks that apply to the Series 2015-GC33 certificates which are in addition to those described in the prospectus with respect to the securities issued by the issuing entity generally.

This prospectus supplement includes cross-references to other sections in this prospectus supplement and to sections in the accompanying prospectus where you can find further related discussions. The Table of Contents in this prospectus supplement and the prospectus identify the pages where these sections are located.

Certain capitalized terms are defined and used in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus to assist you in understanding the terms of the offered certificates and this offering. The capitalized terms used in this prospectus supplement are defined on the pages indicated under the caption “Index of Certain Defined Terms” commencing on page S-362 of this prospectus supplement. The capitalized terms used in the prospectus are defined on the pages indicated under the caption “Glossary” commencing on page 200 of the prospectus.

■      In this prospectus supplement: 

· the terms “depositor,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

· references to “lender” with respect to the mortgage loans generally should be construed to mean, from and after the date of initial issuance of the offered certificates, the trustee on behalf of the issuing entity as the holder of record title to the mortgage loans or the master servicer or the special

S-6

servicer, as applicable, with respect to the obligations and rights of the lender as described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement” in this prospectus supplement.

The Annexes attached to this prospectus supplement are incorporated into and made a part of this prospectus supplement.

THERE IS CURRENTLY NO SECONDARY MARKET FOR THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES. WE CANNOT ASSURE YOU THAT A SECONDARY MARKET WILL DEVELOP OR, IF A SECONDARY MARKET DOES DEVELOP, THAT IT WILL PROVIDE HOLDERS OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES WITH LIQUIDITY OF INVESTMENT OR THAT IT WILL CONTINUE FOR THE TERM OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES. THE UNDERWRITERS CURRENTLY INTEND TO MAKE A MARKET IN THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES, BUT ARE UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO DO SO. ACCORDINGLY, PURCHASERS MUST BE PREPARED TO BEAR THE RISKS OF THEIR INVESTMENTS FOR AN INDEFINITE PERIOD. SEE “RISK FACTORS—THE CERTIFICATES MAY HAVE LIMITED LIQUIDITY AND THE MARKET VALUE OF THE CERTIFICATES MAY DECLINE” IN THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT.

THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION WHERE SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.

THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES DO NOT REPRESENT AN INTEREST IN OR OBLIGATION OF THE DEPOSITOR, THE SPONSORS, THE ORIGINATORS, THE MASTER SERVICER, THE SPECIAL SERVICER, THE TRUSTEE, THE CERTIFICATE ADMINISTRATOR, THE OPERATING ADVISOR, THE CONTROLLING CLASS REPRESENTATIVE, THE COMPANION LOAN HOLDERS (OR THEIR REPRESENTATIVES), THE UNDERWRITERS OR ANY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE AFFILIATES. NEITHER THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES NOR THE MORTGAGE LOANS ARE INSURED OR GUARANTEED BY ANY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY OR INSTRUMENTALITY OR PRIVATE INSURER.

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“YIELD, PREPAYMENT AND MATURITY CONSIDERATIONS—YIELD ON THE CLASS X-A AND CLASS X-D CERTIFICATES” IN THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT.

S-7

UNITED KINGDOM

EACH UNDERWRITER HAS REPRESENTED AND AGREED THAT: 

(A) IN THE UNITED KINGDOM, IT HAS ONLY COMMUNICATED OR CAUSED TO BE COMMUNICATED AND WILL ONLY COMMUNICATE OR CAUSE TO BE COMMUNICATED AN INVITATION OR INDUCEMENT TO ENGAGE IN INVESTMENT ACTIVITY (WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 21 OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (THE “FSMA“)) RECEIVED BY IT IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUE OR SALE OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES IN CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH SECTION 21(1) OF THE FSMA DOES NOT APPLY TO THE DEPOSITOR OR THE ISSUING ENTITY; AND

(B) IT HAS COMPLIED AND WILL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE FSMA WITH RESPECT TO ANYTHING DONE BY IT IN RELATION TO THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES IN, FROM OR OTHERWISE INVOLVING THE UNITED KINGDOM.

NOTICE TO UNITED KINGDOM INVESTORS 

THE ISSUING ENTITY MAY CONSTITUTE A “COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEME“ AS DEFINED BY SECTION 235 OF THE FSMA THAT IS NOT A “RECOGNIZED COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEME“ FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE FSMA AND THAT HAS NOT BEEN AUTHORIZED, REGULATED OR OTHERWISE RECOGNIZED OR APPROVED. AS AN UNREGULATED SCHEME, THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES CANNOT BE MARKETED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC, EXCEPT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FSMA.

THE DISTRIBUTION OF THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT (A) IF MADE BY A PERSON WHO IS NOT AN AUTHORIZED PERSON UNDER THE FSMA, IS BEING MADE ONLY TO, OR DIRECTED ONLY AT, PERSONS WHO (I) ARE OUTSIDE THE UNITED KINGDOM, OR (II) HAVE PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE IN MATTERS RELATING TO INVESTMENTS AND QUALIFY AS INVESTMENT PROFESSIONALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 19(5) OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (FINANCIAL PROMOTION) ORDER 2005 (THE “FINANCIAL PROMOTION ORDER“), OR (III) ARE PERSONS FALLING WITHIN ARTICLE 49(2)(A) THROUGH (D) (“HIGH NET WORTH COMPANIES, UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS, ETC.“) OF THE FINANCIAL PROMOTION ORDER (ALL SUCH PERSONS TOGETHER BEING REFERRED TO AS “FPO PERSONS“); AND (B) IF MADE BY A PERSON WHO IS AN AUTHORIZED PERSON UNDER THE FSMA, IS BEING MADE ONLY TO, OR DIRECTED ONLY AT, PERSONS WHO (I) ARE OUTSIDE THE UNITED KINGDOM, OR (II) HAVE PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE IN MATTERS RELATING TO INVESTMENTS AND QUALIFY AS INVESTMENT PROFESSIONALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 14(5) OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AND MARKETS ACT 2000 (PROMOTION OF COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES) (EXEMPTIONS) ORDER 2001 (THE “PROMOTION OF COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES EXEMPTIONS ORDER“), OR (III) ARE PERSONS FALLING WITHIN ARTICLE 22(2)(A) THROUGH (D) (“HIGH NET WORTH COMPANIES, UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS, ETC.“) OF THE PROMOTION OF COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT SCHEMES EXEMPTIONS ORDER, OR (IV) PERSONS TO WHOM THE ISSUING ENTITY MAY LAWFULLY BE PROMOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 4.12 OF THE UK FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY’S CONDUCT OF BUSINESS SOURCEBOOK (ALL SUCH PERSONS TOGETHER BEING REFERRED TO AS “PCIS PERSONS“ AND, TOGETHER WITH THE FPO PERSONS, THE “RELEVANT PERSONS“).

THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT MUST NOT BE ACTED ON OR RELIED ON BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOT RELEVANT PERSONS. ANY INVESTMENT OR INVESTMENT ACTIVITY TO WHICH THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT RELATES, INCLUDING THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES, IS AVAILABLE ONLY TO RELEVANT PERSONS AND WILL BE ENGAGED IN ONLY WITH RELEVANT PERSONS. ANY PERSONS OTHER THAN RELEVANT PERSONS SHOULD NOT ACT OR RELY ON THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT.

POTENTIAL INVESTORS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM ARE ADVISED THAT ALL, OR MOST, OF THE PROTECTIONS AFFORDED BY THE UNITED KINGDOM REGULATORY SYSTEM WILL NOT APPLY TO AN INVESTMENT IN THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES AND THAT COMPENSATION WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE UNDER THE UNITED KINGDOM FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPENSATION SCHEME.

S-8

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA

THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED ON THE BASIS THAT ANY OFFER OF OFFERED CERTIFICATES IN ANY MEMBER STATE OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA WHICH HAS IMPLEMENTED THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE (EACH, A “RELEVANT MEMBER STATE“) WILL BE MADE PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION UNDER THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE (AS DEFINED BELOW) FROM THE REQUIREMENT TO PUBLISH A PROSPECTUS FOR OFFERS OF CERTIFICATES. ACCORDINGLY ANY PERSON MAKING OR INTENDING TO MAKE AN OFFER IN THAT RELEVANT MEMBER STATE OF CERTIFICATES WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF AN OFFERING CONTEMPLATED IN THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT AS COMPLETED BY FINAL TERMS IN RELATION TO THE OFFER OF THOSE OFFERED CERTIFICATES MAY ONLY DO SO IN CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH NO OBLIGATION ARISES FOR THE ISSUING ENTITY, THE DEPOSITOR OR AN UNDERWRITER TO PUBLISH A PROSPECTUS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 3 OF THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE IN RELATION TO SUCH OFFER.

NONE OF THE ISSUING ENTITY, THE DEPOSITOR OR ANY OF THE UNDERWRITERS HAS AUTHORIZED, NOR DOES ANY OF THEM AUTHORIZE, THE MAKING OF ANY OFFER OF OFFERED CERTIFICATES IN CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH AN OBLIGATION ARISES FOR THE ISSUING ENTITY, THE DEPOSITOR OR AN UNDERWRITER TO PUBLISH OR SUPPLEMENT A PROSPECTUS FOR SUCH OFFER.

FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PROVISION AND THE PROVISION IMMEDIATELY BELOW, THE EXPRESSION “PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE” MEANS DIRECTIVE 2003/71/EC (AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, INCLUDING THE 2010 PD AMENDING DIRECTIVE, TO THE EXTENT IMPLEMENTED IN THE RELEVANT MEMBER STATE), AND INCLUDES ANY RELEVANT IMPLEMENTING MEASURE IN THE RELEVANT MEMBER STATE, AND THE EXPRESSION “2010 PD AMENDING DIRECTIVE“ MEANS DIRECTIVE 2010/73/EU.

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA SELLING RESTRICTIONS

IN RELATION TO EACH RELEVANT MEMBER STATE, EACH UNDERWRITER HAS REPRESENTED AND AGREED THAT, WITH EFFECT FROM AND INCLUDING THE DATE ON WHICH THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE IS IMPLEMENTED IN THAT RELEVANT MEMBER STATE, IT HAS NOT MADE AND WILL NOT MAKE AN OFFER OF THE CERTIFICATES WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE OFFERING CONTEMPLATED BY THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT TO THE PUBLIC IN THAT RELEVANT MEMBER STATE OTHER THAN:

(A) TO ANY LEGAL ENTITY WHICH IS A “QUALIFIED INVESTOR” AS DEFINED IN THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE;

(B) TO FEWER THAN 150 NATURAL OR LEGAL PERSONS (OTHER THAN “QUALIFIED INVESTORS“ AS DEFINED IN THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE) SUBJECT TO OBTAINING THE PRIOR CONSENT OF THE RELEVANT UNDERWRITER OR UNDERWRITERS NOMINATED BY THE ISSUING ENTITY FOR ANY SUCH OFFER; OR

(C) IN ANY OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES FALLING WITHIN ARTICLE 3(2) OF THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE;

PROVIDED THAT NO SUCH OFFER OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES REFERRED TO IN CLAUSES (A), (B) AND (C) ABOVE SHALL REQUIRE THE DEPOSITOR, THE ISSUING ENTITY OR ANY UNDERWRITER TO PUBLISH A PROSPECTUS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 3 OF THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE.

FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE PRIOR PARAGRAPH, THE EXPRESSION AN “OFFER OF THE CERTIFICATES WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE OFFERING CONTEMPLATED BY THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT TO THE PUBLIC” IN RELATION TO ANY CERTIFICATE THAT IS OFFERED IN ANY RELEVANT MEMBER STATE MEANS THE COMMUNICATION IN ANY FORM AND BY ANY MEANS OF SUFFICIENT INFORMATION ON THE TERMS OF THE OFFER AND THE CERTIFICATES TO BE OFFERED SO AS TO ENABLE AN INVESTOR TO DECIDE TO PURCHASE OR SUBSCRIBE TO THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES, AS THE SAME MAY BE VARIED IN THAT RELEVANT MEMBER STATE BY ANY MEASURE IMPLEMENTING THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE IN THAT RELEVANT MEMBER STATE.

S-9

HONG KONG 

NO PERSON HAS ISSUED OR HAD IN ITS POSSESSION FOR THE PURPOSES OF ISSUE, OR WILL ISSUE OR HAVE IN ITS POSSESSION FOR THE PURPOSES OF ISSUE, WHETHER IN HONG KONG OR ELSEWHERE, ANY ADVERTISEMENT, INVITATION OR DOCUMENT RELATING TO THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES, WHICH IS DIRECTED AT, OR THE CONTENTS OF WHICH ARE LIKELY TO BE ACCESSED OR READ BY, THE PUBLIC OF HONG KONG (EXCEPT IF PERMITTED TO DO SO UNDER THE LAWS OF HONG KONG) OTHER THAN WITH RESPECT TO OFFERED CERTIFICATES WHICH ARE OR ARE INTENDED TO BE DISPOSED OF ONLY TO PERSONS OUTSIDE HONG KONG OR ONLY TO “PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS“ WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES ORDINANCE (CAP. 571 OF THE LAWS OF HONG KONG) AND ANY RULES OR REGULATIONS MADE UNDER THAT ORDINANCE. 

THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES (IF THEY ARE NOT A “STRUCTURED PRODUCT“ AS DEFINED IN THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES ORDINANCE (CAP. 571 OF THE LAWS OF HONG KONG) HAVE NOT BEEN OFFERED OR SOLD AND WILL NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD, BY MEANS OF ANY DOCUMENT, OTHER THAN (A) TO “PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS” AS DEFINED IN THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES ORDINANCE (CAP. 571 OF THE LAWS OF HONG KONG) AND ANY RULES OR REGULATIONS MADE UNDER THAT ORDINANCE, OR (B) IN OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH DO NOT RESULT IN THE DOCUMENT CONSTITUTING A “PROSPECTUS“ AS DEFINED IN THE COMPANIES (WINDING UP AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ORDINANCE (CAP. 32 OF THE LAWS OF HONG KONG) OR WHICH DO NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO THE PUBLIC WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE COMPANIES ORDINANCE (CAP. 622 OF THE LAWS OF HONG KONG). FURTHER, THE CONTENTS OF THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR APPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES COMMISSION OF HONG KONG OR ANY OTHER REGULATORY AUTHORITY IN HONG KONG. YOU ARE ADVISED TO EXERCISE CAUTION IN RELATION TO THE OFFERING CONTEMPLATED IN THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT. IF YOU ARE IN ANY DOUBT ABOUT ANY OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT, YOU SHOULD OBTAIN INDEPENDENT PROFESSIONAL ADVICE.

SINGAPORE

NEITHER THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT NOR ANY OTHER DOCUMENT OR MATERIAL IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OFFER OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES HAS BEEN REGISTERED AS A PROSPECTUS WITH THE MONETARY AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE (“MAS“) UNDER THE SECURITIES AND FUTURES ACT (CAP. 289) OF SINGAPORE (THE “SFA“). ACCORDINGLY, MAS ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTENTS OF THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT. THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT IS NOT A PROSPECTUS AS DEFINED IN THE SFA AND STATUTORY LIABILITY UNDER THE SFA IN RELATION TO THE CONTENTS OF PROSPECTUSES WOULD NOT APPLY. THE PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD CONSIDER CAREFULLY WHETHER THE INVESTMENT IS SUITABLE FOR IT.

THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT AND ANY OTHER DOCUMENT OR MATERIAL IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFER OR SALE, OR INVITATION FOR SUBSCRIPTION OR PURCHASE, OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES MAY NOT BE CIRCULATED OR DISTRIBUTED, NOR MAY THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES BE OFFERED OR SOLD, OR BE MADE THE SUBJECT OF AN INVITATION FOR SUBSCRIPTION OR PURCHASE, WHETHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, TO PERSONS IN SINGAPORE OTHER THAN (I) TO AN INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 4A OF THE SFA (“INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR“)) UNDER SECTION 274 OF THE SFA, (II) TO A RELEVANT PERSON (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 275(2) OF THE SFA (“RELEVANT PERSON“)) PURSUANT TO SECTION 275(2) OF THE SFA, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 275 OF THE SFA; (III) TO ANY PERSON PURSUANT TO SECTION 275(1A) OF THE SFA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 275 OF THE SFA; OR (IV) OTHERWISE PURSUANT TO, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF, ANY OTHER APPLICABLE PROVISION OF THE SFA.

UNLESS ANY OFFER OF SUCH OFFERED CERTIFICATES WAS PREVIOUSLY MADE IN OR ACCOMPANIED BY A PROSPECTUS AND WHICH ARE OF THE SAME CLASS AS OTHER OFFERED CERTIFICATES OF A CORPORATION LISTED ON FOR QUOTATION ON A SECURITIES EXCHANGE, ANY SUBSEQUENT OFFERS IN SINGAPORE OF OFFERED CERTIFICATES ACQUIRED PURSUANT TO AN INITIAL OFFER MADE IN RELIANCE ON AN EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 274 OF THE SFA OR SECTION 275 OF THE SFA MAY ONLY BE MADE, PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 276 OF THE SFA, FOR THE INITIAL SIX MONTH PERIOD AFTER SUCH ACQUISITION, TO PERSONS WHO ARE

S-10

INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS OR TO ACCREDITED INVESTORS (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 4A OF THE SFA (“ACCREDITED INVESTOR“)) OR RELEVANT PERSONS OR TO SUCH PERSONS PURSUANT TO AN OFFER REFERRED TO UNDER SECTION 275(1A) OF THE SFA. ANY TRANSFER AFTER SUCH INITIAL SIX MONTH PERIOD IN SINGAPORE SHALL BE MADE, PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 257 OF THE SFA, IN RELIANCE ON ANY APPLICABLE EXEMPTION UNDER SUBDIVISION (4) OF DIVISION 1 OF PART XIII OF THE SFA (OTHER THAN SECTION 280 OF THE SFA).

IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, WHERE THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES ARE SUBSCRIBED OR PURCHASED UNDER SECTION 275 OF THE SFA BY A RELEVANT PERSON WHICH IS:

(A) A CORPORATION (WHICH IS NOT AN ACCREDITED INVESTOR THE SOLE BUSINESS OF WHICH IS TO HOLD INVESTMENTS AND THE ENTIRE SHARE CAPITAL OF WHICH IS OWNED BY ONE OR MORE INDIVIDUALS, EACH OF WHOM IS AN ACCREDITED INVESTOR; OR

(B) A TRUST (WHERE THE TRUSTEE IS NOT AN ACCREDITED INVESTOR) WHOSE SOLE PURPOSE IS TO HOLD INVESTMENTS AND EACH BENEFICIARY IS AN ACCREDITED INVESTOR,

SECURITIES (AS DEFINED IN SECTION 239(1) OF THE SFA) OF THAT CORPORATION OR THE BENEFICIARIES’ RIGHTS AND INTEREST (HOWSOEVER DESCRIBED) IN THAT TRUST SHALL NOT BE TRANSFERABLE FOR SIX MONTHS AFTER THAT CORPORATION OR THAT TRUST HAS ACQUIRED THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES UNDER SECTION 275 OF THE SFA EXCEPT:

(1) TO AN INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR UNDER SECTION 274 OF THE SFA OR TO A RELEVANT PERSON, OR TO ANY PERSON ARISING FROM AN OFFER REFERRED TO IN SECTION 275(1A) OR SECTION 276(4)(i)(B) OF THE SFA;

(2) WHERE NO CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN FOR THE TRANSFER; OR

(3) WHERE THE TRANSFER IS BY OPERATION OF LAW.

JAPAN

THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES HAVE NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE REGISTERED UNDER THE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND EXCHANGE LAW OF JAPAN, AS AMENDED (THE “FIEL“), AND DISCLOSURE UNDER THE FIEL HAS NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE MADE WITH RESPECT TO THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES. ACCORDINGLY, EACH UNDERWRITER HAS REPRESENTED AND AGREED THAT IT HAS NOT, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, OFFERED OR SOLD AND WILL NOT, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, OFFER OR SELL ANY CERTIFICATES IN JAPAN OR TO, OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF, ANY RESIDENT OF JAPAN (WHICH TERM AS USED IN THIS PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT MEANS ANY PERSON RESIDENT IN JAPAN, INCLUDING ANY CORPORATION OR OTHER ENTITY ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF JAPAN) OR TO OTHERS FOR RE-OFFERING OR RE-SALE, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN JAPAN OR TO, OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF, ANY RESIDENT OF JAPAN EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF, AND OTHERWISE IN COMPLIANCE WITH, THE FIEL AND OTHER RELEVANT LAWS, REGULATIONS AND MINISTERIAL GUIDELINES OF JAPAN.

S-11

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

In this prospectus supplement and the prospectus, we use certain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are found in the material, including each of the tables, set forth under “Risk Factors” and “Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations” in this prospectus supplement. Forward-looking statements are also found elsewhere in this prospectus supplement and in the prospectus and include words like “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “estimates” and other similar words. These statements are intended to convey our projections or expectations as of the date of this prospectus supplement. These statements are inherently subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those we anticipate due to changes in, among other things: 

· economic conditions and industry competition,

· political and/or social conditions, and

· the law and government regulatory initiatives.

We will not update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changes in our expectations or changes in the conditions or circumstances on which these statements were originally based.

S-12

CERTIFICATE SUMMARY 

Set forth below are the indicated characteristics of the respective classes of the Series 2015-GC33 certificates. 

Classes of Certificates	Initial Certificate Principal Amount or Notional Amount(1)		Approximate Initial Credit Support	Initial Pass-Through Rate(2)	Pass-Through Rate Description	Expected Weighted Avg. Life(yrs.)(3)	Expected Principal Window(3)
Offered Certificates
Class A-1	$  31,785,000		30.000%(4)	1.643%	Fixed	2.83	10/15 – 8/20
Class A-2	$  15,217,000		30.000%(4)	2.946%	Fixed	4.86	8/20 – 8/20
Class A-3	$220,000,000		30.000%(4)	3.515%	Fixed	9.83	7/25 – 8/25
Class A-4	$331,456,000		30.000%(4)	3.778%	Fixed	9.87	8/25 – 9/25
Class A-AB	$  72,484,000		30.000%(4)	3.522%	Fixed	7.44	8/20 – 7/25
Class X-A	$718,866,000	(5)	N/A	0.989%	Variable IO(6)	N/A	N/A
Class A-S(7)	$  47,924,000	(8)	25.000%	4.114%	Fixed	9.95	9/25 – 9/25
Class B(7)	$  62,302,000	(8)	18.500%	4.571%	WAC(9)	9.95	9/25 – 9/25
Class PEZ(7)	$152,160,000	(8)	14.125%(10)	(11)	(11)	9.95	9/25 – 9/25
Class C(7)	$  41,934,000	(8)	14.125%(10)	4.571%	WAC(9)	9.95	9/25 – 9/25
Class D	$  56,311,000		8.250%	3.172%	Fixed	9.95	9/25 – 9/25
Class X-D	$  56,311,000	(5)	N/A	1.399%	Variable IO(6)	N/A	N/A
Non-Offered Certificates
Class E	$  23,963,000		5.750%	4.571%	WAC(9)	10.07	9/25 – 5/26
Class F	$    9,584,000		4.750%	4.571%	WAC(9)	10.61	5/26 – 5/26
Class G	$  11,129,000		3.589%	4.571%	WAC(9)	10.61	5/26 – 5/26
Class H	$  34,400,233		0.000%	4.571%	WAC(9)	10.61	5/26 – 5/26
Class R(12)	N/A		N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

(1) Approximate, subject to a variance of plus or minus 5%.

(2) Approximate per annum rate as of the closing date.

(3) Determined assuming no prepayments prior to the maturity date or any anticipated repayment date, as applicable, for each mortgage loan and based on the modeling assumptions described under “Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations” in this prospectus supplement.

(4) The credit support percentages set forth for the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates are represented in the aggregate.

(5) The Class X-A and Class X-D certificates will not have certificate principal amounts and will not be entitled to receive distributions of principal. Interest will accrue on the Class X-A and Class X-D certificates at their respective pass-through rates based upon their respective notional amounts. The notional amount of the Class X-A certificates will be equal to the aggregate of the certificate principal amounts of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates and the Class A-S trust component from time to time. The notional amount of the Class X-D certificates will be equal to the certificate principal amount of the Class D certificates from time to time.

(6) The pass-through rate on the Class X-A certificates will generally be a per annum rate equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the weighted average of the net interest rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months), over (ii) the weighted average of the pass-through rates of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates and the Class A-S trust component, as described in this prospectus supplement. The pass-through rate on the Class X-D certificates will generally be a per annum rate equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the weighted average of the net interest rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months), over (ii) the pass-through rate of the Class D certificates, as described in this prospectus supplement.

(7) The Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates, in the applicable proportions, may be exchanged for Class PEZ certificates, and Class PEZ certificates may be exchanged for the applicable proportions of Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates. The Class A-S, Class B, Class PEZ and Class C certificates are collectively referred to in this prospectus supplement as “exchangeable certificates.”

(8) On the closing date, the issuing entity will issue the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components, which will have initial outstanding principal balances, subject to a variance of plus or minus 5%, of $47,924,000, $62,302,000 and $41,934,000, respectively. The exchangeable certificates will, at all times, represent undivided beneficial ownership interests in a grantor trust that will hold such trust components. Each class of the exchangeable certificates will, at all times, represent a beneficial interest in a percentage of the outstanding principal balance of the Class A-S, Class B and/or Class C trust components. Following any exchange of Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates for Class PEZ certificates or any exchange of Class PEZ certificates for Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates, the percentage interest of the outstanding principal balances of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components that is represented by the Class A-S, Class B, Class PEZ and Class C certificates will be increased or decreased accordingly. The initial certificate principal amount of each class of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates shown in the table on the cover page of this prospectus supplement, in the table above and on the back cover of this prospectus supplement represents the maximum certificate principal amount of such class without giving effect to any issuance of Class PEZ certificates. The initial certificate principal amount of the Class PEZ certificates shown in the table on the cover page of this prospectus supplement, in the table above and on the back cover of this prospectus supplement is equal to the aggregate of the maximum initial certificate principal amounts of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates, representing the maximum certificate principal amount of the Class PEZ certificates that could be issued in an exchange. The actual certificate principal amount of any class of exchangeable certificates issued on the closing date may be less than the maximum certificate principal amount of that class and may be zero. The certificate principal amounts of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates to be issued on the closing date will be reduced, in required proportions, by an amount equal to the certificate principal amount of the Class PEZ certificates issued on the closing date. The aggregate certificate principal amount of the offered certificates shown on the cover page and back page of this prospectus supplement includes the maximum certificate principal amount of exchangeable certificates that could be outstanding on the closing date, equal to $152,160,000 (subject to a variance of plus or minus 5%).

(9) For any distribution date, the pass-through rate on each class of the Class B, Class C, Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates will be equal to the weighted average of the net interest rates on the mortgage loans (in each case, adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis

S-13

of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) as of their respective due dates in the month preceding the month in which the related distribution date occurs.

(10) The initial subordination levels for the Class C and Class PEZ certificates are equal to the subordination level of the underlying Class C trust component.

(11) The Class PEZ certificates will not have a pass-through rate, but will be entitled to receive the sum of the interest distributable on the percentage interests of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components represented by the Class PEZ certificates. The pass-through rates on the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components will at all times be the same as the pass-through rates on the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates, respectively.

(12) The Class R certificates will not have a certificate principal amount, notional amount, pass-through rate, rating or rated final distribution date. The Class R certificates will represent the residual interests in each of two separate REMICs, as further described in this prospectus supplement. The Class R certificates will not be entitled to distributions of principal or interest.

The Class E, Class F, Class G, Class H and Class R certificates are not offered by this prospectus supplement.

S-14

Summary

The following is only a summary. Detailed information appears elsewhere in this prospectus supplement and in the accompanying prospectus. That information includes, among other things, detailed mortgage loan information and calculations of cash flows on the offered certificates. To understand all of the terms of the offered certificates, read carefully this entire document and the accompanying prospectus. See “Index of Certain Defined Terms” in this prospectus supplement and “Glossary” in the prospectus for definitions of capitalized terms.

General 

Title of the Certificates	The certificates to be issued are known as the Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC33.
Mortgage Loans	The certificates will be backed by 64 fixed rate mortgage loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the cut-off date of $958,489,233.  The mortgage loans are secured by first liens on various types of commercial and multifamily properties.
Transaction Overview	On the closing date, each sponsor will sell its respective mortgage loans to the depositor, which will in turn deposit them into a common law trust created on the closing date.  That common law trust, which will be the issuing entity, will be formed pursuant to a pooling and servicing agreement, to be dated as of September 1, 2015, among the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the certificate administrator and the trustee.  Subject to the discussion under “—Transaction Parties—Companion Loan Holders and Other Parties Related to Loan Combinations” below, the master servicer and, if and when necessary, the special servicer will each service the mortgage loans for which it is responsible in accordance with the pooling and servicing agreement and provide information to the certificate administrator as necessary for the certificate administrator to calculate distributions and other information regarding the certificates.
	The transfers of the mortgage loans from the sponsors to the depositor in exchange for cash and from the depositor to the issuing entity in exchange for the certificates, as well as the sales of the offered certificates by the depositor to the underwriters and by the underwriters to investors that purchase from them, are illustrated below:

S-15

Transaction Parties
Issuing Entity	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33, a New York common law trust to be established on the closing date of this securitization transaction under the pooling and servicing agreement, dated as of September 1, 2015, between the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee, the certificate administrator and the operating advisor.  See “Transaction Parties—The Issuing Entity” in this prospectus supplement.
Depositor	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., a Delaware corporation.  As depositor, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. will acquire the mortgage loans from the sponsors and transfer them to the issuing entity.  The depositor’s address is 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013 and its telephone number is (212) 816-6000.  See “Transaction Parties—The Depositor” in this prospectus supplement and “Transaction Participants—The Depositor” in the prospectus.
Sponsors	The mortgage loans will be sold to the depositor by the following sponsors, which have organized and initiated the transaction in which the certificates will be issued:
	·	Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp., a New York corporation (40.1% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date);
	·	Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, a New York limited partnership (34.4% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date);
	·	Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (19.3% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date);
	·	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (3.3% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date); and
	·	RAIT Funding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (2.9% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date).
	See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors” in this prospectus supplement.

S-16

Originators The mortgage loans were originated by the entities set forth in the following chart:

Originator	Sponsor	Number of Mortgage Loans	% of Initial Pool Balance
Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.	Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.	22	40.1	%
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company	Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company	11	30.9
Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC	Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC	18	19.3
GS Commercial Real Estate LP	Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company	5	3.5
KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	5	3.3
RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	3	2.9
Total		64	100.0	%

	See “Transaction Parties—The Originators” in this prospectus supplement.
Companion Loan Holders and Other
Parties Related to Loan
Combinations	As described under “The Trust Fund—Mortgage Loans—Loan Combinations” in the accompanying prospectus, any of the mortgage loans held by the issuing entity may be part of a split loan structure referred to in this prospectus supplement as a “loan combination”.  A loan combination consists of the particular mortgage loan to be included in the issuing entity (a “split mortgage loan”) and one or more “companion loans” that will be held outside the issuing entity.  Any holder of a related companion loan would constitute a “companion loan holder”.  The subject mortgage loan and its related companion loan(s) comprising any particular loan combination are:  (i) each evidenced by one or more separate promissory notes; (ii) obligations of the same borrower(s); (iii) cross-defaulted; and (iv) collectively secured by the same mortgage(s) and/or deed(s) of trust encumbering the related mortgaged property or portfolio of mortgaged properties.
	A companion loan may be pari passu in right of payment with, or subordinate in right of payment to, the related split mortgage loan.  In connection therewith:
	·	If a companion loan is pari passu in right of payment with the related split mortgage loan, then such companion loan would constitute a “pari passu companion loan” and the related loan combination would constitute a “pari passu loan combination”.
	·	If a companion loan is subordinate in right of payment to the related split mortgage loan, then such companion loan would constitute a “subordinate companion loan” and the related loan combination would constitute an “AB loan combination”.
	·	If a loan combination includes both a pari passu companion loan and a subordinate companion loan, the discussions in this prospectus supplement regarding both pari passu loan combinations and AB loan combinations will apply to such loan combination.

S-17

In the case of any loan combination, the allocation of payments to the subject mortgage loan and its related companion loan(s), whether on a senior/subordinated or a pari passu basis (or some combination thereof), is generally effected through a co-lender agreement, intercreditor agreement, agreement among noteholders or comparable agreement to which the respective holders of the subject promissory notes are parties (any such agreement being referred to in this prospectus supplement as a “co-lender agreement”).  That co-lender agreement will govern the relative rights and obligations of such holders and, in connection therewith, will provide that one of those holders will be the “controlling note holder” entitled (directly or through a representative) to (i) approve or direct material servicing decisions involving the related loan combination (while the remaining such holder(s) generally are only entitled to non-binding consultation rights in such regard) and (ii) in some cases, replace the special servicer with respect to the related loan combination with or without cause.  In addition, that co-lender agreement will designate whether servicing of the related loan combination is to be governed by the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization or the pooling and servicing agreement, trust and servicing agreement or other comparable agreement for a securitization involving a related companion loan or portion thereof.  In connection therewith:
·	If a loan combination is serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement, trust and servicing agreement or other comparable agreement for a securitization involving a related companion loan or portion thereof (such agreement, an “outside servicing agreement”), then such loan combination would constitute an “outside serviced loan combination”, the related mortgage loan would constitute an “outside serviced mortgage loan” and any related companion loan would constitute an “outside serviced companion loan”.
·	If a pari passu loan combination is serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization transaction, then such pari passu loan combination would constitute a “serviced loan combination” or a “serviced pari passu loan combination”, any related pari passu companion loan would constitute a “serviced companion loan” or a “serviced pari passu companion loan” and any holder of a related pari passu companion loan would constitute a “serviced companion loan holder” or a “serviced pari passu companion loan holder”.
·	If an AB loan combination is serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization transaction, then such AB loan combination would constitute a “serviced loan combination” or a “serviced AB loan combination”, the related subordinate companion loan would constitute a “serviced companion loan” or a “serviced subordinate companion loan” and any holder of the related subordinate companion loan would constitute a “serviced companion loan holder” or a “serviced subordinate companion loan holder”.
·	If and for so long as the “controlling note” with respect to any serviced loan combination (regardless of whether such note evidences a pari passu companion loan or a subordinate companion loan) is not included in this securitization transaction, then such serviced loan combination would constitute a “serviced outside controlled loan combination”, the related mortgage loan would constitute a “serviced outside controlled mortgage loan” and the related serviced companion loan would constitute a “serviced outside controlled companion loan”.  However, a serviced outside controlled

S-18

	loan combination may cease to be such if, by virtue of any trigger event contemplated by the related co-lender agreement, the promissory note evidencing the related split mortgage loan becomes the controlling note for such loan combination, in which case the discussion in this prospectus supplement regarding “serviced outside controlled loan combinations” will thereafter cease to apply to the subject loan combination.
With respect to any loan combination that is, and only for so long as such loan combination is, a serviced outside controlled loan combination, the “outside controlling note holder” will at any time be the holder of the related controlling note (regardless of whether such note evidences a pari passu companion loan or a subordinate companion loan) or such holder’s designated representative.  If, with respect to any serviced outside controlled loan combination, the related controlling note is included in a securitization trust, the pooling and servicing agreement, trust and servicing agreement or other comparable agreement for the relevant securitization will likely designate a particular party associated with that securitization, which may be, among others, a “controlling class representative” (or equivalent party), the majority holder of a particular class, a servicer or another service provider, to exercise the rights associated with the related controlling note, although the right of any such designated party to exercise some or all of such rights may terminate or shift to another designated party upon the occurrence of certain trigger events.
Each of the following mortgage loans to be held by the issuing entity is part of a loan combination:
·	the mortgage loan secured by the portfolio of mortgaged properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Illinois Center, which mortgage loan represents approximately 10.4% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date (the “Illinois Center mortgage loan”);
·	the mortgage loan secured by the portfolio of mortgaged properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hammons Hotel Portfolio, which mortgage loan represents approximately 10.4% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date (the “Hammons Hotel Portfolio mortgage loan”);
·	the mortgage loan secured by the mortgaged property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as The Decoration & Design Building, which mortgage loan represents approximately 6.8% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date (“The Decoration & Design Building mortgage loan”); and
·	the mortgage loan secured by the mortgaged property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Somerset Park Apartments, which mortgage loan represents approximately 3.8% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date (the “Somerset Park Apartments mortgage loan”).

S-19

The following characteristics apply to the Illinois Center loan combination:
·	The Illinois Center loan combination includes two (2) companion loans (each an “Illinois Center pari passu companion loan” and, collectively, the “Illinois Center pari passu companion loans”), which are pari passu in right of payment with the Illinois Center mortgage loan.
·	The Illinois Center pari passu companion loans, which are evidenced by the non-controlling notes A-2 and A-3, are currently held by Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. and are expected to be contributed to one or more future commercial mortgage securitization transactions.
·	The Illinois Center loan combination is a serviced loan combination that will be serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization transaction.
·	The controlling note holder for the Illinois Center loan combination (which is the holder of the controlling note A-1 included in this securitization transaction) will be the trustee on behalf of the holders of the Series 2015-GC33 certificates and, in accordance with the pooling and servicing agreement, such rights of the trustee will be exercised by the controlling class representative until a Control Termination Event shall have occurred and be continuing.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations—The Illinois Center Loan Combination” in this prospectus supplement.
The following characteristics apply to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio loan combination:
·	The Hammons Hotel Portfolio loan combination includes three (3) companion loans (each a “Hammons Hotel Portfolio pari passu companion loan” and, collectively, the “Hammons Hotel Portfolio pari passu companion loans”), which are pari passu in right of payment with the Hammons Hotel Portfolio mortgage loan.
·	The Hammons Hotel Portfolio pari passu companion loans, which are evidenced by the non-controlling notes A-2, A-3 and A-4, are currently held by Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company and are expected to be contributed to one or more future commercial mortgage securitization transactions.
·	The Hammons Hotel Portfolio loan combination is a serviced loan combination that will be serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization transaction.
·	The controlling note holder for the Hammons Hotel Portfolio loan combination (which is the holder of the controlling note A-1 included in this securitization transaction) will be the trustee on behalf of the holders of the Series 2015-GC33 certificates and, in accordance with the pooling and servicing agreement, such rights of the trustee will be exercised by the controlling class representative until a Control Termination Event (as described under “—Significant Dates, Events and Periods” below) shall have occurred and be continuing.

S-20

See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations—The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination” in this prospectus supplement.
The following characteristics apply to The Decoration & Design loan combination:
·	The Decoration & Design Building loan combination includes one (1) companion loan (“The Decoration & Design Building pari passu companion loan”), which is pari passu in right of payment with The Decoration & Design Building mortgage loan.
·	The Decoration & Design Building pari passu companion loan, which is evidenced by the controlling note A-1, was contributed by Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. to the commercial mortgage securitization transaction (the “CGCMT 2015-P1 securitization”) involving the issuance of the Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-P1, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-P1 (the “CGCMT 2015-P1 certificates”).
·	The Decoration & Design Building loan combination is an outside serviced loan combination that is being serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement for the CGCMT 2015-P1 securitization (the “CGCMT 2015-P1 pooling and servicing agreement” and also an “outside servicing agreement”) by the master servicer for the CGCMT 2015-P1 securitization and, if and to the extent necessary, will be specially serviced by the special servicer for the CGCMT 2015-P1 securitization.
·	The controlling note holder for The Decoration & Design Building loan combination (which is the holder of the controlling note A-1 included in the CGCMT 2015-P1 securitization) will be the trustee for the CGCMT 2015-P1 securitization on behalf of the holders of the CGCMT 2015-P1 certificates.  In accordance with the CGCMT 2015-P1 pooling and servicing agreement, the rights of the holder of such companion loan will be exercised by the controlling class representative for the CGCMT 2015-P1 securitization (the “CGCMT 2015-P1 controlling class representative” and also an “outside controlling class representative”) or another party designated under the CGCMT 2015-P1 pooling and servicing agreement.
See “—CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer, Special Servicer, Trustee and Custodian” below and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations—The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination” in this prospectus supplement.
The following characteristics apply to the Somerset Park Apartments loan combination:
·	The Somerset Park Apartments loan combination includes four (4) companion loans (each a “Somerset Park Apartments pari passu companion loan” and, collectively, the “Somerset Park Apartments pari passu companion loans”), which are pari passu in right of payment with the Somerset Park Apartments mortgage loan (which is comprised of two (2) non-controlling notes designated as notes A-1-3 and A-2-3).

S-21

·	The Somerset Park Apartments pari passu companion loans evidenced by the controlling notes A-1-1 and A-2-1 were contributed by Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC to the commercial mortgage securitization transaction (the “WFCM 2015-C30 securitization”) involving the issuance of the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-C30, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C30 (the “WFCM 2015-C30 certificates”).
·	The Somerset Park Apartments pari passu companion loans evidenced by the non-controlling notes A-1-2 and A-2-2 are currently held by Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC and are expected to be included in one or more future commercial mortgage securitization transactions.
·	The Somerset Park Apartments loan combination is an outside serviced loan combination that is being serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement for the WFCM 2015-C30 securitization (the “WFCM 2015-C30 pooling and servicing agreement” and also an “outside servicing agreement”) by the master servicer for the WFCM 2015-C30 securitization and, if and to the extent necessary, will be specially serviced by the special servicer for the WFCM 2015-C30 securitization.
·	The controlling note holder for Somerset Park Apartments loan combination (which is the holder of the controlling notes A-1-1 and A-2-1 included in the WFCM 2015-C30 securitization) is the trustee for the WFCM 2015-C30 securitization on behalf of the holders of the WFCM 2015-C30 certificates.  In accordance with the WFCM 2015-C30 pooling and servicing agreement, the rights of the holder of such companion loan will be exercised by the controlling class representative for the WFCM 2015-C30 securitization (the “WFCM 2015-C30 controlling class representative” and also an “outside controlling class representative”) or another party designated under the WFCM 2015-C30 pooling and servicing agreement.
See “—WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer, Special Servicer, Trustee and Custodian” below and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations—The Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination” in this prospectus supplement.
There are no serviced outside controlled loan combinations, subordinate companion loans or AB loan combinations related to this securitization transaction and, therefore, all references in this prospectus supplement to “serviced outside controlled loan combinations”, “subordinate companion loans”, “AB loan combinations” or any related terms should be disregarded.
Each outside controlling class representative and each holder of a companion loan may have interests in conflict with those of the holders of the offered certificates.  See “Risk Factors—Potential Conflicts of Interest of a Directing Holder, any Outside Controlling Class Representative and any Companion Loan Holder” and “—Loan Combinations Pose Special Risks” in this prospectus supplement.

S-22

Trustee and Custodian	Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, a New York banking corporation.  The corporate trust offices of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas are located at 1761 East St. Andrew Place, Santa Ana, California 92705-4934, Attention: Trust Administration-CGCMT Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33.  Following the transfer of the underlying mortgage loans into the issuing entity, the trustee, on behalf of the issuing entity, will become the mortgagee of record with respect to each of the mortgage loans (other than any outside serviced mortgage loan) transferred to the issuing entity.  In addition, subject to the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, the trustee will be primarily responsible for back-up advancing.  See “Transaction Parties—The Trustee” in this prospectus supplement.
	As described under “—CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer, Special Servicer, Trustee and Custodian” below, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas is the trustee for the securitization of the controlling The Decoration & Design Building pari passu companion loan and, accordingly, the mortgagee of record for The Decoration & Design Building loan combination.
	As described under “—WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer, Special Servicer, Trustee and Custodian” below, Wilmington Trust, National Association is the trustee for the securitization of the controlling Somerset Park Apartments pari passu companion loan and, accordingly, the mortgagee of record for the Somerset Park Apartments loan combination.
Certificate Administrator	Citibank, N.A., a national banking association organized under the laws of the United States. The corporate trust office of the Certificate Administrator responsible for:  (i) administration of the issuing entity is located at 388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor, New York, New York 10013, Attention: Global Transaction Services – CGCMT Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33; and (ii) certificate transfer services and the presentment of Certificates for final payment thereon is located at 480 Washington Boulevard, 30th Floor, Jersey City, New Jersey 07310, Attention:  Global Transaction Services – CGCMT Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33.  See “Transaction Parties—The Certificate Administrator” in this prospectus supplement.
Operating Advisor	Situs Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.  At any time that a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the operating advisor will generally review the special servicer’s operational practices in respect of the applicable specially serviced mortgage loan(s) to formulate an opinion as to whether or not those operational practices generally satisfy the servicing standard with respect to the resolution and/or liquidation of such specially serviced mortgage loan(s).  In addition, at any time after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the operating advisor will consult on a non-binding basis with the special servicer with regard to certain major decisions with respect to the applicable serviced mortgage loan(s) to the extent described in this prospectus supplement and as provided in the pooling and servicing agreement.
	At any time after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the operating advisor will be required to review certain operational activities related to the applicable specially serviced mortgage loan(s) in general on a platform-level basis.  Based on the operating advisor’s review of certain information described in this prospectus supplement, the operating advisor will be required (if any applicable mortgage loan(s) were specially serviced under the pooling

S-23

and servicing agreement for this securitization transaction during the prior calendar year) to prepare an annual report to be provided to the depositor, the rule 17g-5 information provider, the trustee and the certificate administrator (and made available through the certificate administrator’s website) setting forth its assessment of the special servicer’s performance of its duties under the pooling and servicing agreement on a platform-level basis with respect to the resolution and liquidation of the applicable specially serviced mortgage loan(s). No annual report will be required from the operating advisor with respect to the special servicer if during the prior calendar year no asset status report was prepared by the special servicer in connection with a specially serviced loan or REO property.

At any time that a Consultation Termination Event (as described under “—Significant Dates, Events and Periods” below) has occurred and is continuing, the operating advisor may recommend the replacement of the special servicer with respect to the mortgage loans and any companion loan(s) serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization transaction (but not the related outside special servicer with respect to any outside serviced mortgage loan) if the operating advisor determines that the special servicer is not performing its duties as required under the pooling and servicing agreement or is otherwise not acting in accordance with the servicing standard, as described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination of the Special Servicer” in this prospectus supplement.

Additionally, if the holders of at least 15% of the voting rights of the certificates other than the Class X-A, Class X-D and Class R certificates (but considering only those classes of certificates that, in each case, have an outstanding certificate principal amount, as notionally reduced by any appraisal reduction amounts then allocable to the subject class, equal to or greater than 25% of (i) the initial certificate principal amount of such class minus (ii) all payments of principal previously made with respect to such class, and considering each class of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates, together with the Class PEZ certificates’ applicable percentage interest of the trust component with the same alphabetic class designation, as a single “class” for such purpose) request a vote to replace the operating advisor, then the operating advisor may be replaced by the holders of more than 50% of the voting rights of the certificates other than the Class X-A, Class X-D and Class R certificates (but considering only those classes of certificates that, in each case, have an outstanding certificate principal amount, as notionally reduced by any appraisal reduction amounts then allocable to the subject class, equal to or greater than 25% of (i) the initial certificate principal amount of such class minus (ii) payments of principal previously made with respect to such class, and considering each class of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates, together with the Class PEZ certificates’ applicable percentage interest of the trust component with the same alphabetic class designation, as a single “class” for such purpose) that exercise their right to vote; provided that holders of at least 50% of the voting rights of such certificates exercise their right to vote.  See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Operating Advisor—Termination of the Operating Advisor Without Cause” in this prospectus supplement.

For additional information regarding the operating advisor and its responsibilities, see “Transaction Parties—The Operating Advisor” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Operating Advisor” in this prospectus supplement.

S-24

Master Servicer	Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, a national banking association.  The master servicer will initially service all of the mortgage loans (other than any outside serviced mortgage loan) and any serviced companion loans either directly or through a sub-servicer pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement.  The principal west coast commercial mortgage master servicing offices of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association are located at MAC-A0227-020, 1901 Harrison Street, Oakland, California 94612.  The principal east coast commercial mortgage master servicing offices of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association are located at MAC-D1086-120, 550 South Tryon Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28202.  See “Transaction Parties—Servicers—The Master Servicer”, “—Servicing Compensation, Operating Advisor Compensation and Payment of Expenses” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.
	The mortgage loans transferred to the issuing entity (other than any outside serviced mortgage loan(s)) are sometimes referred to in this prospectus supplement as the “serviced mortgage loans,” and all of the serviced mortgage loans, together with any serviced companion loan(s), are sometimes referred to in this prospectus supplement as the “serviced loans.”
	As described under “—CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer, Special Servicer, Trustee and Custodian” below, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, a national banking association, is the initial servicer for The Decoration & Design Building loan combination pursuant to the CGCMT 2015-P1 pooling and servicing agreement.
	As described under “—WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer, Special Servicer, Trustee and Custodian” below, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, a national banking association, is the initial servicer for the Somerset Park Apartments loan combination pursuant to the WFCM 2015-C30 pooling and servicing agreement.
Special Servicer	LNR Partners, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, is the initial special servicer with respect to all of the mortgage loans (other than any outside serviced mortgage loan and any excluded special servicer mortgage loan) and any serviced companion loans pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement. If the special servicer becomes a borrower party (as defined under “—Directing Holder / Controlling Class Representative” below) with respect to any mortgage loan (such mortgage loan, an “excluded special servicer mortgage loan”), it will be required to resign with respect to the servicing of that mortgage loan. The controlling class representative (prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event) will be entitled to appoint a separate special servicer that is not a borrower party with respect to such excluded special servicer mortgage loan (such special servicer, an “excluded mortgage loan special servicer”) unless such excluded special servicer mortgage loan is also an excluded mortgage loan (as defined under “—Directing Holder / Controlling Class Representative” below), in which case the largest controlling class certificateholder (by certificate principal amount) that is not an excluded controlling class holder with respect to that mortgage loan will be entitled to appoint the excluded mortgage loan special servicer. (A controlling class certificateholder that is a borrower party with respect to any mortgage loan will be an “excluded controlling class holder” with respect to that mortgage loan.) See “—Directing Holder / Controlling Class Representative” below. Any excluded mortgage loan special servicer will be required to perform all of

S-25

the obligations of the special servicer for the related excluded special servicer mortgage loan and will be entitled to all special servicing compensation with respect to such excluded special servicer mortgage loan earned during such time as the related mortgage loan is an excluded special servicer mortgage loan. If neither the controlling class representative nor any controlling class certificateholder is entitled to appoint an excluded mortgage loan special servicer for an excluded special servicer mortgage loan, an excluded mortgage loan special servicer will be appointed in the manner described in this prospectus supplement and as provided under the pooling and servicing agreement. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination of the Special Servicer” in this prospectus supplement.
The special servicer will be primarily responsible for making decisions and performing certain servicing functions with respect to any such mortgage loan or loan combination that, in general, is in default or as to which default is reasonably foreseeable.  LNR Partners, LLC was appointed the special servicer for this securitization transaction at the request of LNR Securities Holdings, LLC (which is an affiliate of LNR Partners, LLC), and LNR Securities Holdings, LLC or an affiliate thereof is expected to be the initial controlling class representative and the initial directing holder with respect to all of the mortgage loans and loan combinations serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization transaction other than any serviced outside controlled loan combinations.  LNR Securities Holdings, LLC, or an affiliate thereof, is expected to purchase a majority of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates (and may also purchase additional classes of certificates) and PFP IV Sub II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or an affiliate thereof, is expected to purchase the remainder of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates.  See “—Directing Holder / Controlling Class Representative” below.  The primary servicing office of LNR Partners, LLC is located at 1601 Washington Avenue, Suite 700, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, and its telephone number is (305) 695-5600.  See “Transaction Parties—Servicers—The Special Servicer”, “—Servicing Compensation, Operating Advisor Compensation and Payment of Expenses” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.
As described under “—CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer, Special Servicer, Trustee and Custodian” below, LNR Partners, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, is the initial special servicer for The Decoration & Design Building loan combination pursuant to the CGCMT 2015-P1 pooling and servicing agreement.
As described under “—WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer, Special Servicer, Trustee and Custodian” below, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, is the initial special servicer for the Somerset Park Apartments loan combination pursuant to the WFCM 2015-C30 pooling and servicing agreement.
The special servicer (but not the outside special servicer with respect to any outside serviced mortgage loan) may be removed in such capacity under the pooling and servicing agreement, with or without cause, and a successor special servicer appointed, from time to time, as follows:
·	unless a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the special servicer may be removed and replaced by the controlling class representative (other than with respect to any serviced outside

S-26

	controlled loan combination or any excluded mortgage loan) (a) for cause at any time and (b) without cause if either (i) LNR Partners, LLC or an affiliate thereof is no longer the special servicer or (ii) LNR Securities Holdings, LLC or an affiliate thereof owns less than 15% of the certificate principal amount of the then controlling class of certificates, in each case, upon satisfaction of certain conditions specified in the pooling and servicing agreement;
·	after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the holders of at least 25% of the voting rights of the certificates (other than the Class R certificates) may request a vote to replace the special servicer (except with respect to any serviced outside controlled loan combination).  The subsequent vote may result in the termination and replacement of the special servicer if within 180 days of the initial request for that vote the holders of (a) at least 75% of the voting rights of the certificates (other than the Class R certificates), or (b) more than 50% of the voting rights of each class of certificates other than the Class X-A, Class X-D and Class R certificates (but, for purposes of this clause (b), considering only those classes of certificates that, in each case, have an outstanding certificate principal amount, as notionally reduced by any appraisal reduction amounts then allocable to the subject class, equal to or greater than 25% of (i) the initial certificate principal amount of such class minus (ii) payments of principal previously made with respect to such class, and considering each class of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates, together with the Class PEZ certificates’ applicable percentage interest of the trust component with the same alphabetic class designation, as a single “class” for such purpose), vote affirmatively to so replace; and
·	the special servicer may be removed and replaced by the related outside controlling note holder solely with respect to the related serviced outside controlled loan combination with or without cause at any time, upon satisfaction of certain conditions specified in the pooling and servicing agreement and the related co-lender agreement.
Additionally, at any time after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, if the operating advisor determines that the special servicer is not performing its duties as required under the pooling and servicing agreement or is otherwise not acting in accordance with the servicing standard, the operating advisor may recommend the replacement of the special servicer with respect to any serviced loans. In connection with such a recommendation, the special servicer would be replaced with respect to the applicable serviced loans if, within 180 days of the initial request for that vote, the holders of more than 50% of the voting rights of each class of certificates other than the Class X-A, Class X-D and Class R certificates (but considering only those classes of certificates that, in each case, have an outstanding certificate principal amount, as notionally reduced by any appraisal reduction amounts then allocable to the subject class, equal to or greater than 25% of (i) the initial certificate principal amount of such class minus (ii) payments of principal previously made with respect to such class, and considering each class of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates, together with the Class PEZ certificates’ applicable percentage interest of the trust component with the same alphabetic class designation, as a single “class” for such purpose), vote affirmatively to so replace.

S-27

	Further, the special servicer may be removed and replaced based on the occurrence of certain servicer termination events on the part of the special servicer, as further described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicer Termination Events” and “—Rights Upon Servicer Termination Event” in this prospectus supplement.  In addition, in the case of a serviced loan combination, if a servicer termination event on the part of the special servicer affects only (i) the related serviced companion loan that is part of such serviced loan combination, (ii) the holder of such serviced companion loan or (iii) the rating on a class of securities backed by such serviced companion loan, then, at the direction of the holder of such serviced companion loan, in each case, the trustee will be required to terminate the special servicer solely with respect to that serviced loan combination, as further described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicer Termination Events” and “—Rights Upon Servicer Termination Event” in this prospectus supplement.
	An outside special servicer may only be removed in such capacity in accordance with the terms and provisions of the applicable outside servicing agreement and the co-lender agreement governing the related outside serviced loan combination.
	See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination of the Special Servicer” in this prospectus supplement.  See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” in this prospectus supplement for a discussion of the loan combinations and the companion loans.
CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer,
Special Servicer, Trustee and
Custodian	The Decoration & Design Building loan combination is being serviced pursuant to the CGCMT 2015-P1 pooling and servicing agreement, dated as of August 1, 2015.  The parties to the CGCMT 2015-P1 pooling and servicing agreement are Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer (the “CGCMT 2015-P1 servicer” and an “outside servicer”), LNR Partners, LLC, as special servicer (the “CGCMT 2015-P1 special servicer” and an “outside special servicer”), Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee (the “CGCMT 2015-P1 trustee” and an “outside trustee”), Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as operating advisor (in such capacity, an “outside operating advisor”).  Accordingly, (i) The Decoration & Design Building mortgage loan and the related mortgaged property are being serviced and administered by the CGCMT 2015-P1 servicer and the CGCMT 2015-P1 special servicer, (ii) the CGCMT 2015-P1 trustee will serve as mortgagee of record with respect to The Decoration & Design Building mortgage loan, and (iii) in its capacity as custodian under the CGCMT 2015-P1 pooling and servicing agreement, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association will serve as a custodian with respect to the mortgage loan file for The Decoration & Design Building mortgage loan (other than with respect to the promissory note evidencing The Decoration & Design Building mortgage loan).  None of the master servicer or the special servicer (in each such capacity) or any other party to this securitization transaction is responsible for the performance by any party to the CGCMT 2015-P1 pooling and servicing agreement of its duties thereunder, including with respect to the servicing of The Decoration & Design Building mortgage loan.

S-28

	See “Transaction Parties—Servicers—The Outside Servicers and the Outside Special Servicers” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans—Servicing of The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan” in this prospectus supplement.
WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer,
Special Servicer, Trustee and
Custodian	The Somerset Park Apartments loan combination is being serviced pursuant to the WFCM 2015-C30 pooling and servicing agreement, dated as of August 1, 2015.  The parties to the WFCM 2015-C30 pooling and servicing agreement are Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as general master servicer (the “WFCM 2015-C30 servicer” and an “outside servicer”), National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB master servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as general special servicer (the “WFCM 2015-C30 special servicer” and an “outside special servicer”), National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB special servicer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee (the “WFCM 2015-C30 trustee” and an “outside trustee”), Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as certificate administrator, tax administrator and custodian, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as trust advisor (in such capacity, an “outside operating advisor”).  Accordingly, (i) the Somerset Park Apartments mortgage loan and the related mortgaged property are being serviced and administered by the WFCM 2015-C30 servicer and the WFCM 2015-C30 special servicer, (ii) the WFCM 2015-C30 trustee serves as mortgagee of record with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments mortgage loan, and (iii) in its capacity as custodian under the WFCM 2015-C30 pooling and servicing agreement, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association serves as a custodian with respect to the mortgage loan file for the Somerset Park Apartments mortgage loan (other than with respect to the promissory notes evidencing the Somerset Park Apartments mortgage loan and any related companion loan not included in the WFCM 2015-C30 securitization).  None of the master servicer or the special servicer (in each such capacity) or any other party to this securitization transaction is responsible for the performance by any party to the WFCM 2015-C30 pooling and servicing agreement of its duties thereunder, including with respect to the servicing of the Somerset Park Apartments mortgage loan.
	See “Transaction Parties—Servicers—The Outside Servicers and the Outside Special Servicers” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans—Servicing of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan” in this prospectus supplement.
Directing Holder / Controlling Class
Representative	The “directing holder” with respect to any mortgage loan (or, if applicable, loan combination (other than an outside serviced loan combination)) under the pooling and servicing agreement will be:
	·	with respect to any such mortgage loan (other than an excluded mortgage loan) or loan combination (other than a serviced outside controlled loan combination), the controlling class representative; and
	·	with respect to any serviced outside controlled loan combination, the related outside controlling note holder.

S-29

The controlling class representative under the pooling and servicing agreement will be the controlling class certificateholder or other representative selected by more than 50% of the controlling class certificateholders (by certificate principal amount).  No person may exercise any of the rights and powers of the controlling class representative with respect to an excluded mortgage loan.

An “excluded mortgage loan” is a mortgage loan or loan combination with respect to which the controlling class representative or a holder of more than 50% of the controlling class of certificates (by certificate principal amount) is (i) a borrower, a mortgagor or a manager of a mortgaged property or an affiliate of any of the foregoing (any such person, a “borrower party”) or (ii) a lender under a mezzanine loan, secured by a pledge of the direct (or indirect) equity interests in the borrower under that mortgage loan or loan combination, that has accelerated such mezzanine loan or commenced foreclosure proceedings against the equity collateral pledged to secure that mezzanine loan (any such person, also a “borrower party”).

The controlling class is the most subordinate class of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates that has an outstanding certificate principal amount, as notionally reduced by any appraisal reduction amounts then allocable to such class, that is equal to or greater than 25% of the initial certificate principal amount of that class of certificates, or if no such class meets the preceding requirement, then Class E will be the controlling class; provided, however, that (at any time that the aggregate certificate principal amount of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class D certificates and the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components has been reduced to zero without regard to the allocation of appraisal reduction amounts) (a) in the case of any class of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates to which the designation of “controlling class” would otherwise shift by operation of this definition, where the certificate principal amount of such class of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates has been reduced to zero (without regard to the allocation of appraisal reduction amounts) prior to such shift, then designation of “controlling class” shall not shift and shall remain with the class of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates currently designated as the controlling class, and (b) in the case of any class of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates which is then designated the “controlling class”, if the certificate principal amount of such class of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates is reduced to zero (without regard to the allocation of appraisal reduction amounts), then the designation of “controlling class” shall shift to the class of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates that is the most subordinate and that also has a remaining certificate principal amount.  The controlling class as of the Closing Date will be the Class H certificates.  See “Description of the Offered Certificates—Voting Rights” in this prospectus supplement.  No other class of certificates will be eligible to act as the controlling class or appoint a controlling class representative.

The related outside controlling note holder (with respect to each serviced outside controlled loan combination) and, so long as a Control Termination Event does not exist, the controlling class representative (with respect to the other serviced loans) will have certain consent and/or consultation rights under the pooling and servicing agreement with respect to certain major decisions and other matters with respect to each mortgage loan or, if applicable, loan combination (other than an outside serviced loan combination).  In addition, if and to the extent that the

S-30

holder of the split mortgage loan included in any serviced outside controlled loan combination has consultation rights, the controlling class representative may consult with respect to certain major decisions and other matters with respect to such loan combination so long as a Consultation Termination Event does not exist.

After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the consent rights of the controlling class representative will terminate, and the controlling class representative will retain consultation rights under the pooling and servicing agreement with respect to certain major decisions and other matters with respect to the applicable serviced loans.

After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, all of these rights of the controlling class representative with respect to the applicable serviced loans will terminate.  See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Directing Holder” in this prospectus supplement.

If, with respect to any serviced outside controlled loan combination, the related controlling note is included in a separate securitization trust, the pooling and servicing agreement, trust and servicing agreement or comparable agreement for the relevant securitization may impose limitations on the exercise of rights associated with that related controlling note.  For example, any “controlling class representative” (or equivalent entity) for such other securitization may lose consent and consultation rights in a manner similar to that described in the prior two paragraphs with respect to the CGCMT 2015-GC33 controlling class representative.

LNR Securities Holdings, LLC, or an affiliate thereof, is expected, on the closing date, to (i) purchase a majority of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates, and (ii) appoint LNR Securities Holdings, LLC, or an affiliate thereof, to be the initial controlling class representative (and initial directing holder with respect to all of the mortgage loans and loan combinations serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization transaction other than (x) any serviced AB loan combination, with respect to which the initial directing holder will be the holder of the related subordinate companion loan, (y) any serviced outside controlled loan combination, with respect to which the initial directing holder will be the holder of the related pari passu companion loan and (z) any excluded mortgage loan).

The related outside controlling note holder (with respect to each serviced outside controlled loan combination) and, so long as a Control Termination Event does not exist, the controlling class representative (with respect to the other serviced loans) may direct the special servicer to take actions with respect to the servicing of the applicable serviced mortgage loan(s) that could adversely affect the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates, and may remove and replace the special servicer with respect to the applicable serviced loan(s), with or without cause, upon satisfaction of certain conditions specified in the pooling and servicing agreement and, in the case of any loan combination, the related co-lender agreement.

With respect to any excluded special servicer mortgage loan (that is not also an excluded mortgage loan), if any, the controlling class representative (prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event) will be entitled to appoint an excluded mortgage loan

S-31

	special servicer with respect to such mortgage loan. For so long as a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the controlling class representative will not have the right to replace an excluded mortgage loan special servicer with respect to an excluded special servicer mortgage loan. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination of the Special Servicer” in this prospectus supplement.
	The controlling class representative and any outside controlling note holder may have interests in conflict with those of the holders of the offered certificates. See “Risk Factors—Potential Conflicts of Interest of a Directing Holder, any Outside Controlling Class Representative and any Companion Loan Holder” in this prospectus supplement.
Significant Affiliations
and Relationships	Certain parties to this securitization transaction, as described under “Transaction Parties—Certain Affiliations and Certain Relationships—Transaction Party and Related Party Affiliations” in this prospectus supplement, may:
	·	serve in multiple capacities with respect to this securitization transaction;
	·	be affiliated with other parties to this securitization transaction, a controlling class certificateholder, the controlling class representative and/or the holder of a companion loan or any securities backed in whole or in part by a companion loan;
	·	serve as an outside servicer, outside special servicer, outside trustee or outside operating advisor with respect to any securitization involving a companion loan in an outside serviced loan combination; or
	·	be affiliated with an outside servicer, outside special servicer, outside trustee or outside operating advisor with respect to any securitization involving a companion loan in an outside serviced loan combination.
	In addition, certain parties to this securitization transaction or a directing holder may otherwise have financial relationships with other parties to this securitization transaction. Such relationships may include, without limitation:
	·	serving as warehouse lender to one or more of the sponsors and/or originators of this securitization transaction through a repurchase facility or otherwise (including with respect to certain mortgage loans to be contributed to this securitization transaction), where the proceeds received by such sponsor(s) and/or originator(s) in connection with the contribution of mortgage loans to this securitization transaction will be applied to, among other things, reacquire the financed mortgage loans from the repurchase counterparty or other warehouse provider (see “Transaction Parties—Certain Affiliations and Certain Relationships—Warehouse Financing Arrangements” in this prospectus supplement);
	·	serving as interim servicer for one or more of the sponsors and/or originators of this securitization transaction (including with respect to certain mortgage loans to be contributed by such sponsor(s) and/or originator(s) to this securitization transaction) (see “Transaction

S-32

		Parties—Certain Affiliations and Certain Relationships—Interim Servicing Arrangements” in this prospectus supplement);
	·	serving as interim custodian for one or more of the sponsors and/or originators of this securitization transaction (including with respect to certain mortgage loans to be contributed by such sponsor(s) and/or originator(s) to this securitization transaction) (see “Transaction Parties—Certain Affiliations and Certain Relationships—Interim and Other Custodial Arrangements” in this prospectus supplement);
	·	entering into one or more agreements with the sponsors to purchase the servicing rights to the related mortgage loans and/or the right to be appointed as the master servicer with respect to such mortgage loans; and/or
	·	performing due diligence services prior to the securitization closing date for one or more sponsors, a controlling class certificateholder or the controlling class representative with respect to certain of the mortgage loans to be contributed to this securitization transaction (see “Transaction Parties–Certain Affiliations and Certain Relationships–Other Arrangements” in this prospectus supplement).
	In addition, certain of the sponsors and/or other parties to this securitization transaction or their respective affiliates may hold mezzanine debt, a companion loan, securities backed in whole or in part by a companion loan, or other additional debt related to one or more of the mortgage loans to be included in this securitization transaction, and as such may have certain rights relating to the related mortgage loan(s) and/or loan combination(s), as described under “Transaction Parties—Certain Affiliations and Certain Relationships—Loan Combination and Mezzanine Loan Arrangements” in this prospectus supplement. In the event a sponsor or other party to this securitization transaction or any affiliate of any of the foregoing includes any companion loan in a separate securitization transaction, such sponsor, other party or affiliate may be obligated to repurchase such companion loan from the applicable separate securitization trust in connection with certain breaches of representations and warranties and certain document defects.
	Each of the foregoing relationships, to the extent applicable, is described under “Transaction Parties—Certain Affiliations and Certain Relationships” in this prospectus supplement.
	These roles and other potential relationships may give rise to conflicts of interest as further described under “Risk Factors—Interests and Incentives of the Originators, the Sponsors and Their Affiliates May Not Be Aligned with Your Interests” and “—Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment” in this prospectus supplement.
Significant Obligor	Each of (i) the portfolio of mortgaged properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Illinois Center, securing a mortgage loan representing approximately 10.4% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, and (ii) the portfolio of mortgaged properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hammons Hotel Portfolio, securing a mortgage loan representing approximately 10.4% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, is a “significant obligor” (as such term is used in Items 1101 and 1112 of Regulation AB under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) with respect to this offering.

S-33

	See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Significant Obligor” in this prospectus supplement and “Structural and Collateral Term Sheet—Illinois Center” and “—Hammons Hotel Portfolio” in Annex B to this prospectus supplement.
Significant Dates, Events and Periods
Cut-off Date	With respect to each mortgage loan, the due date in September 2015 for that mortgage loan (or, in the case of any mortgage loan that has its first due date in October 2015, the date that would have been its due date in September 2015 under the terms of that mortgage loan if a monthly payment were scheduled to be due in that month).
Closing Date	On or about September 29, 2015.
Distribution Date	The certificate administrator will make distributions on the certificates, to the extent of available funds, on the fourth business day following the related determination date of each month, beginning in October 2015, to the holders of record at the end of the previous calendar month.
Determination Date	The sixth day of each calendar month or, if the sixth day is not a business day, the next business day, beginning in October 2015.
Expected Final Distribution Date	Class A-1	August 2020
	Class A-2	August 2020
	Class A-3	August 2025
	Class A-4	September 2025
	Class A-AB	July 2025
	Class X-A	September 2025
	Class A-S	September 2025
	Class B	September 2025
	Class PEZ	September 2025
	Class C	September 2025
	Class D	September 2025
	Class X-D	September 2025
	The expected final distribution date for each class of offered certificates is the date on which that class is expected to be paid in full (or, in the case of each class of the Class X-A and Class X-D certificates, the date on which the related notional amount is reduced to zero), assuming no delinquencies, losses, modifications, extensions or accelerations of maturity dates, repurchases or prepayments of the mortgage loans after the initial issuance of the offered certificates (other than the assumed repayment of a mortgage loan on any anticipated repayment date for such mortgage loan).
	The expected final distribution date with respect to each class of the Class A-S, Class B, Class PEZ and Class C certificates assumes that the maximum certificate principal amount of that class of certificates was issued on the closing date and there were no subsequent exchanges of such certificates.
Rated Final Distribution Date	As to each class of offered certificates, the distribution date in September 2058.
Collection Period	For any mortgage loan and any distribution date, the period commencing on the day immediately following the due date (without regard to grace periods) for that mortgage loan in the month preceding the month in which the applicable distribution date occurs (or, in the case of the

S-34

	distribution date occurring in October 2015, beginning on the day after the cut-off date) and ending on and including the due date (without regard to grace periods) for that mortgage loan in the month in which the applicable distribution date occurs.
Control Termination Event	A “Control Termination Event” will occur when none of the classes of Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates has an outstanding certificate principal amount (as notionally reduced by any appraisal reduction amounts then allocable to such class) that is at least equal to 25% of the initial certificate principal amount of that class of certificates; provided, however, that a Control Termination Event will in no event exist at any time that the aggregate certificate principal amount of each class of certificates (other than the classes of Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates) (without regard to the allocation of appraisal reduction amounts) has been reduced to zero.
Consultation Termination Event	A “Consultation Termination Event” will occur when none of the classes of Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates has an outstanding certificate principal amount, without regard to the allocation of any appraisal reduction amounts, that is equal to or greater than 25% of the initial certificate principal amount of that class of certificates; provided, however, that a Consultation Termination Event will in no event exist at any time that the aggregate certificate principal amount of each class of certificates (other than the classes of Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates) (without regard to the allocation of appraisal reduction amounts) has been reduced to zero.
The Mortgage Loans
General	The issuing entity’s primary assets will be 64 fixed rate mortgage loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the cut-off date of $958,489,233. The mortgage loans are secured by first liens on 92 commercial and multifamily properties located in 26 states. See “Risk Factors—Commercial and Multifamily Lending Is Dependent on Net Operating Income” in this prospectus supplement.
Fee Simple / Leasehold	Eighty-seven (87) mortgaged properties, securing approximately 87.5% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans, by allocated loan amount, as of the cut-off date, are each subject to a mortgage, deed of trust or similar security instrument that creates a first mortgage lien on a fee simple estate in the entire related mortgaged property. For purposes of this prospectus supplement, an encumbered interest will be characterized as a “fee interest” and not a leasehold interest if (i) the borrower has a fee interest in all or substantially all of the mortgaged property, or (ii) the mortgage loan is secured by the borrower’s leasehold interest in the mortgaged property as well as the borrower’s (or other fee owner’s) overlapping fee interest in the related mortgaged property.
	Two (2) mortgaged properties, collectively securing approximately 7.8% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans, by allocated loan amount, as of the cut-off date, are each subject to a mortgage, deed of trust or similar security instrument that creates a first mortgage lien on the borrower’s leasehold interest in the related mortgaged property.
	Three (3) mortgaged properties, collectively securing approximately 4.7% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans, by allocated loan amount, as of the cut-off date, are each subject to a

S-35

	mortgage, deed of trust or similar security instrument that creates a first mortgage lien on (x) one or more leasehold interests in a material portion of the related mortgaged property and (y) one or more fee interests in the remaining portion of the related mortgaged property.
	See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans—Leasehold Interests” in this prospectus supplement.
The Loan Combinations	Each of four (4) of the mortgage loans, representing approximately 10.4%, 10.4%, 6.8% and 3.8%, respectively, of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, is part of a split loan structure or loan combination, which is comprised of the subject mortgage loan and one or more related pari passu or subordinate companion loans that are held outside the issuing entity.  In the case of a loan combination, the related mortgage loan and companion loans are each evidenced by separate promissory notes but are all secured by the same mortgages or deeds of trust encumbering the same mortgaged property or portfolio of mortgaged properties.
	Certain information regarding the loan combination(s) is identified in the following table:
	Mortgaged Property Name	Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance	Mortgage Loan as a % of Initial Pool Balance		Aggregate Pari Passu Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance		Loan Combination Cut-off Date Balance
	Illinois Center	$100,000,000	10.4	%	$160,000,000	(1)	$260,000,000
	Hammons Hotel Portfolio	$100,000,000	10.4	%	$150,800,000	(2)	$250,800,000
	The Decoration & Design Building	$65,000,000	6.8	%	$100,000,000		$165,000,000
	Somerset Park Apartments	$36,500,000	3.8	%	$143,500,000	(3)	$180,000,000

(1)	The Illinois Center pari passu companion loans are currently comprised of the non-controlling notes A-2 and A-3, which have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the cut-off date of $160,000,000.
(2)	The Hammons Hotel Portfolio pari passu companion loans are currently comprised of the non-controlling notes A-2, A-3 and A-4, which have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the cut-off date of $150,800,000.
(3)	The Somerset Park Apartments pari passu companion loans are currently comprised of the controlling notes A-1-1 and A-2-1 and the non-controlling notes A-1-2 and A-2-2, which have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the cut-off date of $143,500,000.
With respect to any mortgage loan that is part of a loan combination, the loan-to-value ratio, debt service coverage ratio and debt yield have been calculated based on both that mortgage loan and any related pari passu companion loan(s), but without regard to any related subordinate companion loan(s), unless otherwise indicated.
For more information regarding the loan combination(s), see “—Transaction Parties—Companion Loan Holders and Other Parties Related to Loan Combinations” above and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement. Also, see “Structural and Collateral Term Sheet—Structural Overview” in Annex B to this prospectus supplement.

S-36

Due Dates / Grace Periods	Subject in some cases to a next business day convention, monthly payments of principal and/or interest on each mortgage loan are due as shown below with the indicated grace periods.
	Due Date		Default Grace Period Days	Number of Mortgage Loans	% of Initial Pool Balance
	6		0	61	97.1	%
	1		5	3	2.9
	Total			64	100.0	%
	As used in this prospectus supplement, “grace period” is the number of days before a payment default is an event of default under each mortgage loan. See Annex A to this prospectus supplement for information on the number of days before late payment charges are due under each mortgage loan. The information on Annex A to this prospectus supplement regarding the number of days before a late payment charge is due is based on the express terms of the mortgage loans. Some jurisdictions may impose a statutorily longer period.
Interest-Only Mortgage Loans /
Amortizing Mortgage Loans	Five (5) of the mortgage loans, representing approximately 13.4% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, provide for monthly payments of interest-only until their maturity dates or anticipated repayment dates, as applicable. The remaining 59 mortgage loans, representing approximately 86.6% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, provide for monthly payments of principal and interest based on an amortization schedule that is significantly longer than the remaining terms to maturity (or terms to anticipated repayment dates) for such mortgage loans. However, 38 of these 59 mortgage loans, representing approximately 58.2% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, provide for an initial interest-only period ranging from 12 months to 69 months following the related origination date.
	The following mortgage loan is characterized by a non-standard amortization schedule:
	·	the mortgage loan secured by the mortgaged property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Greylyn Business Park, representing approximately 3.7% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, amortizes based on the non-standard amortization schedule set forth on Annex G to this prospectus supplement.
Balloon Loans / ARD Loans	All of the mortgage loans will have substantial principal payments due on their respective maturity dates unless prepaid earlier, subject to the terms and conditions of the prepayment provisions of each mortgage loan; provided, that if any loans with anticipated repayment dates, as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—ARD Loans” in this prospectus supplement, are included in the issuing entity, such mortgage loans will have substantial principal payments due on their respective anticipated repayment dates, unless prepaid earlier. There are no loans with anticipated repayment dates included in the issuing entity and, therefore, all references in this prospectus supplement to “loans with anticipated repayment dates,”

S-37

	“anticipated repayment dates” and “excess interest” should be disregarded.
Additional Characteristics
of the Mortgage Loans	General characteristics of the mortgage loans as of the cut-off date:
			All Mortgage Loans
	Initial Pool Balance(1)		$958,489,233
	Number of Mortgage Loans		64
	Number of Mortgaged Properties		92
	Average Cut-off Date Mortgage Loan Balance		$14,976,394
	Weighted Average Mortgage Loan Rate(2)		4.5900%
	Range of Mortgage Loan Rates(2)		4.1100% – 5.3600%
	Weighted Average Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio(2)(3)		66.6%
	Weighted Average Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio(2)(4)		57.4%
	Weighted Average Cut-off Date Remaining Term to Maturity Date (months)		119
	Weighted Average Cut-off Date DSCR(2)(5)		1.66x
	Full-Term Amortizing Balloon Mortgage Loans		28.4%
	Partial Interest-Only Balloon Mortgage Loans		58.2%
	Interest-Only Balloon Mortgage Loans		13.4%
	(1)	Subject to a permitted variance of plus or minus 5%.
	(2)	With respect to each mortgage loan that is part of a loan combination, the Mortgage Loan Rate, Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio, Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio and Cut-off Date DSCR are calculated based on both that mortgage loan and any related pari passu companion loan(s), but without regard to any related subordinate companion loan(s), unless otherwise indicated. Other than as specifically noted, the Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio, Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio, Cut-off Date DSCR and Mortgage Loan Rate information for each mortgage loan is presented in this prospectus supplement without regard to any other indebtedness (whether or not secured by the related mortgaged property, ownership interests in the related borrower or otherwise) that currently exists or that may be incurred by the related borrower or its owners in the future.
	(3)	In most cases, the Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio for each mortgage loan is calculated utilizing the “as-is” appraised value. However, in the case of 7 mortgage loans, representing approximately 19.9% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, the respective Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio was calculated using certain adjustments and/or assumptions instead of the related “as-is” appraised value as described in the definitions of “Appraised Value” and/or “Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in this prospectus supplement. The weighted average Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio for the mortgage pool using only “as-is” appraised values and without making any of the adjustments and/or assumptions described in the definitions of “Appraised Value” and/or “Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in this prospectus supplement is 67.1%.
	(4)	In most cases, the Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio for each mortgage loan is calculated utilizing the “as-is” appraised value. However, in the case of 20 mortgage loans, representing approximately 47.1% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, the respective Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio was calculated using certain adjustments and/or assumptions instead of the related “as-is” appraised value as described in the definitions of “Appraised Value” and/or “Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in this prospectus supplement. The weighted average Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio for the mortgage pool using only “as-is” appraised values and without making any of the adjustments and/or assumptions described in the definitions of “Appraised Value” and/or “Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in this prospectus supplement is 59.5%.
	(5)	With respect to the mortgage loan secured by the mortgaged property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Greylyn Business Park, representing approximately 3.7% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, which amortizes based on the non-standard amortization schedule set forth on Annex G to this prospectus supplement, the Cut-off Date DSCR of such mortgage loan is calculated based on the aggregate debt service during the 12-month period commencing August 6, 2017.
	See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in this prospectus supplement for important general and

S-38

	specific information regarding the manner of calculation of the underwritten debt service coverage ratios and loan-to-value ratios.
Modified and Refinanced
Mortgage Loans	One (1) of the mortgage loans, representing approximately 1.1% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, was a refinancing in whole or in part of a loan that was in default at the time of refinancing or otherwise involved discounted pay-offs or provided acquisition financing for the related borrower’s purchase of the related mortgaged property at a foreclosure sale or after becoming REO, as described below:
	·	With respect to the mortgage loan secured by the mortgaged property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Waterway Shoppes II, representing approximately 1.1% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, the related borrower was the obligor under a prior loan secured by the related mortgaged property that was in default and in special servicing. The prior loan was subsequently sold at a discount to a party not affiliated with the current mortgage loan seller (the “new noteholder”). The new noteholder and the borrower negotiated a modification to the prior loan, including an increase in interest rate and a decrease in the then current unpaid principal balance. The mortgage loan refinanced the modified prior loan in full.
	See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings” in this prospectus supplement.
	Certain risks relating to bankruptcy proceedings are described in “Risk Factors—A Bankruptcy Proceeding May Result in Losses and Delays in Realizing on the Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.
Interest Accrual Basis	All of the mortgage loans accrue interest on the basis of the actual number of days in each applicable one-month accrual period, assuming a 360-day year.
Prepayment / Defeasance /
Property Release Provisions	The terms of each mortgage loan restrict the ability of the borrower to defease and/or prepay the mortgage loan as follows:
	·	Fifty-three (53) mortgage loans, representing approximately 90.1% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, permit the related borrower, after a lockout period of at least 2 years following the closing date (or, in the case of a loan combination, the earlier of (a) the second anniversary of the securitization of the last note included in such loan combination and (b) a specified date no earlier than three years from the date of origination of such loan combination) and prior to the related open prepayment period described below, to substitute U.S. government securities as collateral and obtain a release of the related mortgaged property (or, if applicable, one or more of the related mortgaged properties), but the borrower may not prepay the mortgage loan in whole prior to such open prepayment period.
	·	Nine (9) mortgage loans, representing approximately 6.6% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, permit the related borrower, after a lockout period of 11 to 26 payments following the origination date, to prepay the

S-39

	mortgage loan in whole or, in some cases, in connection with a partial release of a mortgaged property, in part, in each case together with the payment of the greater of a yield maintenance charge and a prepayment premium of 1.0% of the prepaid amount if such prepayment occurs prior to the related open prepayment period.
·	Two (2) mortgage loans, representing approximately 3.3% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, permit the related borrower, after a lockout period of 2 years following the closing date, to either (a) substitute U.S. government securities as collateral and obtain a release of the related mortgaged property or (b) prepay the mortgage loan with the payment of the greater of a yield maintenance charge and a prepayment premium of 1.0% of the prepaid amount if such prepayment occurs prior to the related open prepayment period.
See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Partial Releases”, “—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Voluntary Prepayments” and “—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—’Due-On-Sale’ and ‘Due-On-Encumbrance’ Provisions” in this prospectus supplement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing restrictions on prepayments, the mortgage loans generally permit voluntary prepayment without payment of a yield maintenance charge or any prepayment premium during a limited “open period” immediately prior to and including the maturity date or anticipated repayment date, as applicable, as follows:
Prepayment Open Periods
Open Periods (Payments)		Number of Mortgage Loans	% of Initial Pool Balance
3		11	11.6	%
4		44	56.4
5		4	12.7
7		5	19.2
Total		64	100.0	%

S-40

Property Types	The following table lists the various property types of the mortgaged properties:
	Property Types of the Mortgaged Properties(1)
	Property Type		Number of Mortgaged Properties	Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
	Office		8	$254,412,500	26.5	%
	Hospitality		19	218,211,299	22.8
	Retail		27	215,701,636	22.5
	Multifamily		14	125,411,482	13.1
	Self Storage		18	59,750,884	6.2
	Mixed Use(2)		4	46,180,175	4.8
	Industrial		2	38,821,257	4.1
	Total		92	$958,489,233	100.0	%
	(1)	Because this table presents information relating to mortgaged properties and not the mortgage loans, the information for the mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property is based on allocated loan amounts as stated in Annex A to this prospectus supplement.
	(2)	Each mixed use property includes a combination of office, retail, self storage, flex and/or multifamily components.
Property Locations	The mortgaged properties are located in 26 states. The following table lists the states that have concentrations of mortgaged properties that secure 5.0% or more of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans by allocated loan amount as of the cut-off date:
	Geographic Distribution(1)
	State		Number of Mortgaged Properties	Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
	Illinois		14	$160,703,794	16.8	%
	California		7	$133,805,560	14.0	%
	New York		4	$77,320,018	8.1	%
	Texas		12	$76,079,346	7.9	%
	North Carolina		4	$73,390,541	7.7	%
	Florida		8	$62,190,566	6.5	%
	Michigan		4	$57,500,000	6.0	%
	(1)	Because this table presents information relating to mortgaged properties and not the mortgage loans, the information for the mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property is based on allocated loan amounts as stated in Annex A to this prospectus supplement.
Certain Calculations
and Definitions	The descriptions in this prospectus supplement of the mortgage loans and the mortgaged properties are based upon the mortgage pool as it is expected to be constituted as of the close of business on the closing date, assuming that (i) all scheduled principal and interest payments due on or before the cut-off date will be made, (ii) there are no defaults, delinquencies or prepayments on any mortgage loan or the companion loan(s) on or prior to the closing date of this securitization transaction and (iii) each mortgage loan with an anticipated repayment date (if any) is paid in full on its related anticipated repayment date. The sum of the numerical data in any column in a table may not equal the indicated total due to rounding. Unless otherwise indicated, all figures presented in this “Summary” are calculated as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool” in this prospectus supplement and all percentages

S-41

	represent the indicated percentage of the aggregate principal balance of the entire pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date.
	When information presented in this prospectus supplement with respect to the mortgaged properties is expressed as a percentage of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, if a mortgage loan is secured by more than 1 mortgaged property, the percentages are based on an allocated loan amount that has been assigned to each of the related mortgaged properties based upon one or more of the related appraised values, the relative underwritten net cash flow or prior allocations reflected in the related mortgage loan documents as set forth on Annex A to this prospectus supplement.
	With respect to any mortgage loan that is part of a loan combination, we generally present the loan-to-value ratio, debt service coverage ratio, debt yield and cut-off date balance per net rentable square foot, room or unit, as applicable, in this prospectus supplement in a manner that takes account of that mortgage loan and any related pari passu companion loan(s), but without regard to any related subordinate companion loan(s), unless otherwise indicated. Other than as specifically noted, the loan-to-value ratio, the debt service coverage ratio, debt yield and mortgage loan rate information for each mortgage loan is presented in this prospectus supplement without regard to any other indebtedness (whether or not secured by the related mortgaged property, ownership interests in the related borrower or otherwise) that currently exists or that may be incurred by the related borrower or its owners in the future, in order to present statistics for the related mortgage loan without combination with the other indebtedness.
	In addition, for purposes of the presentation of information in this prospectus supplement, certain loan-to-value ratio, appraised value, debt yield, debt service coverage ratio and/or cut-off date principal balance information or other underwritten statistics may be based on certain adjustments, assumptions and/or estimates, as further described under “—Additional Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans” above, and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” and “—Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.
	None of the mortgage loans in the issuing entity will be cross-collateralized with any mortgage loan that is not in the issuing entity, except as described in this prospectus supplement with respect to the mortgage loans that constitute part of a loan combination and that are secured by a mortgaged property or portfolio of mortgaged properties that also secure one or more companion loans not included in the issuing entity.
Certain Variances from Underwriting
Standards	Except as indicated in the following paragraph, all of the mortgage loans were originated substantially in accordance with the respective originators’ underwriting guidelines described under “Transaction Parties—The Originators” in this prospectus supplement.
	Two (2) mortgage loans, representing approximately 3.1% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, were originated with exceptions to the related originator’s guidelines. See “Transaction Parties—The Originators—Citigroup

S-42

	Global Markets Realty Corp.—Exceptions to Underwriting Criteria” for a discussion of these exceptions.
Mortgaged Properties with Limited
or No Operating History	Seven (7) of the mortgaged properties, securing approximately 8.5% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date by allocated loan amount, were constructed, substantially renovated, re-positioned or repurposed 12 months or less prior to the cut-off date and, therefore, have no or limited prior operating history and/or lack historical financial figures and information.
	See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—General” in this prospectus supplement.
Certain Mortgage Loans with Material
Lease Termination Options	Certain mortgage loans have material lease early termination options. See Annex B to this prospectus supplement for information regarding material lease termination options for the 10 largest tenants by base rent at the Mortgaged Properties securing the largest 20 mortgage loans (considering each crossed group as a single mortgage loan) by aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date. Also, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Lease Expirations and Terminations” in this prospectus supplement for information on material tenant lease expirations and early termination options.
Removal of Mortgage Loans
From the Mortgage Pool	Generally, a mortgage loan may only be removed from the mortgage pool as a result of (a) a repurchase or substitution by a sponsor for any mortgage loan for which it cannot remedy the material breach (or, in certain cases, a breach that is deemed to be material) or material document defect (or, in certain cases, a defect that is deemed to be material) affecting such mortgage loan under the circumstances described in this prospectus supplement, (b) the exercise of a purchase option by a mezzanine lender, or the holder of a subordinate companion loan, in each case if any, or (c) a final disposition of a mortgage loan such as a payment in full or a sale of a defaulted mortgage loan or REO property. See “Risk Factors—Your Yield May Be Affected by Defaults, Prepayments and Other Factors—The Timing of Prepayments and Repurchases May Change Your Anticipated Yield,” “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions”, “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans—Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties” in this prospectus supplement.

S-43

The Certificates
The Offered Certificates
A.	General	We are offering the following classes of Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates from the Series 2015-GC33:
		·	Class A-1
		·	Class A-2
		·	Class A-3
		·	Class A-4
		·	Class A-AB
		·	Class X-A
		·	Class A-S
		·	Class B
		·	Class PEZ
		·	Class C
		·	Class D
		·	Class X-D
		The Series 2015-GC33 certificates will consist of the above classes, together with the following classes that are not being offered through this prospectus supplement and the prospectus: Class E, Class F, Class G, Class H and Class R certificates.
B.	Certificate Principal
	Amounts or Notional Amounts	Subject to the discussion in the following paragraph, each class of the offered certificates will have the approximate aggregate initial certificate principal amount (or notional amount, in the case of each class of the Class X-A and Class X-D certificates) set forth in the table under “Certificate Summary” in this prospectus supplement, which principal amount (or notional amount) may vary up to 5% on the closing date.
		The initial certificate principal amount of each class of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates shown in the table under “Certificate Summary” in this prospectus supplement represents the maximum certificate principal amount of such class without giving effect to any issuance of Class PEZ certificates. The initial certificate principal amount of the Class PEZ certificates shown in the table under “Certificate Summary” in this prospectus supplement is equal to the aggregate of the maximum initial certificate principal amounts of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates, which is the maximum certificate principal amount of the Class PEZ certificates that could be issued in an exchange. The actual certificate principal amount of any class of exchangeable certificates issued on the closing date may be less than the maximum certificate principal amount of that class and may be zero. The certificate principal amounts of the Class A-S, Class B and

S-44

		Class C certificates to be issued on the closing date will be reduced, in required proportions, by an amount equal to the certificate principal amount of the Class PEZ certificates issued on the closing date.
		The aggregate certificate principal amount of any class of principal balance certificates or trust component outstanding at any time represents the maximum amount that its holders (or, in the case of a trust component, the holders of exchangeable certificates evidencing an interest in that trust component) are entitled to receive at such time as distributions allocable to principal from the cash flow on the mortgage loans and the other assets in the issuing entity, subject to reduction as described below in this “—The Offered Certificates” section.
		See “Description of the Offered Certificates—General” in this prospectus supplement.
C.	Pass-Through Rates	Each class of the offered certificates (other than the Class PEZ certificates) will accrue interest at an annual rate called a pass-through rate on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months or a “30/360 basis.” The approximate initial pass-through rate for each class of offered certificates is set forth in the table under “Certificate Summary” in this prospectus supplement.
		For any distribution date, the pass-through rate with respect to each class of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB, Class A-S and Class D certificates will be fixed at the initial pass-through rate for such class set forth in the table under “Certificate Summary” in this prospectus supplement. For any distribution date, the pass-through rate with respect to each class of the Class B and Class C certificates will be equal to the weighted average of the net interest rates on the mortgage loans (in each case, adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) as of their respective due dates in the month preceding the month in which the related distribution date occurs.
		The pass-through rate of the Class X-A certificates will generally be a per annum rate equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the weighted average of the net interest rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months), over (ii) the weighted average of the pass-through rates of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates and the Class A-S trust component as described in this prospectus supplement.
		The pass-through rate of the Class X-D certificates will generally be a per annum rate equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the weighted average of the net interest rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months), over (ii) the pass-through rate of the Class D certificates as described in this prospectus supplement. The Class PEZ certificates will not have a pass-through rate, but will be entitled to receive the sum of the interest distributable on the percentage interests of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components represented by the Class PEZ certificates. The pass-through rates on the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components will at all times be the same as the pass-through rates on the Class A-S, Class B and

S-45

		Class C certificates, respectively.
		For purposes of calculating the pass-through rates on the Class X-A and Class X-D certificates and any other class of certificates or trust component that has a pass-through rate limited by, equal to or based on the weighted average of the net mortgage interest rates on the mortgage loans:
		·	the mortgage loan interest rates will not reflect any default interest rate, any rate increase occurring after an anticipated repayment date (if applicable), any loan term modifications agreed to by the special servicer or any modifications resulting from a borrower’s bankruptcy or insolvency; and
		·	with respect to each mortgage loan that accrues interest on the basis of the actual number of days in a month, assuming a 360-day year, the related mortgage loan interest rate (net of the administrative fee rate) for any month that is not a 30-day month will be recalculated so that the amount of interest that would accrue at that rate in that month, calculated on a 30/360 basis, will equal the amount of net interest that actually accrues on that mortgage loan in that month, adjusted for any withheld amounts and/or closing date deposits as described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Accounts” in this prospectus supplement.
		See “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions—Payment Priorities” in this prospectus supplement.
D.	Exchangeable Certificates /
	Exchange Proportions	If you own Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates in an exchange proportion that we describe in this prospectus supplement, you will be able to exchange them for a proportionate interest in the Class PEZ certificates, and vice versa. You can exchange your exchangeable certificates by notifying the certificate administrator. If you own Class PEZ certificates, those certificates will entitle you to receive principal and interest in the amounts that would otherwise have been payable on the applicable proportion of Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates exchangeable for those Class PEZ certificates. Any such allocations of principal and interest as between classes of exchangeable certificates will have no effect on the principal or interest entitlements of any other class of certificates. Exchanges will be subject to various conditions that we describe in this prospectus supplement.
		See “Description of the Offered Certificates—Exchangeable Certificates” in this prospectus supplement and “Description of the Certificates—Exchangeable Certificates” in the accompanying prospectus for a description of the exchangeable certificates and exchange procedures. See also “Risk Factors—The Exchangeable Certificates Are Subject to Additional Risks” in this prospectus supplement.

S-46

Distributions
A.	Amount and Order of
	Distributions	On each distribution date, funds available for distribution from the mortgage loans, net of specified expenses of the issuing entity, net of yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums, will be distributed in the following amounts and order of priority:
		First: Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class X-A certificates: to interest on the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class X-A certificates, up to, and pro rata in accordance with, their respective interest entitlements.
		Second: Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates: to the extent of funds allocable to principal received or advanced on the mortgage loans:
		(A)	to principal on the Class A-AB certificates until their certificate principal amount has been reduced to the Class A-AB scheduled principal balance set forth on Annex F to this prospectus supplement for the relevant distribution date;
		(B)	to principal on the Class A-1 certificates until their certificate principal amount has been reduced to zero, all remaining funds available for distribution of principal remaining after the distributions pursuant to clause (A) above;
		(C)	to principal on the Class A-2 certificates until their certificate principal amount has been reduced to zero, all remaining funds available for distribution of principal remaining after the distributions pursuant to clauses (A) and (B) above;
		(D)	to principal on the Class A-3 certificates until their certificate principal amount has been reduced to zero, all remaining funds available for distribution of principal remaining after the distributions pursuant to clauses (A) through (C) above;
		(E)	to principal on the Class A-4 certificates until their certificate principal amount has been reduced to zero, all remaining funds available for distribution of principal remaining after the distributions pursuant to clauses (A) through (D) above; and
		(F)	to principal on the Class A-AB certificates until their certificate principal amount has been reduced to zero, all remaining funds available for distribution of principal remaining after the distributions pursuant to clauses (A) through (E) above.
		However, if the certificate principal amounts of each and every class of certificates other than the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates have been reduced to zero as a result of the allocation of mortgage loan losses (and other unanticipated expenses) to those certificates, funds available for distributions of principal will be distributed to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates, pro rata, based on their respective certificate principal amounts and without regard to the Class A-AB scheduled principal balance.
		Third: Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates: to reimburse the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4

S-47

and Class A-AB certificates, pro rata, based on the aggregate unreimbursed losses, for any unreimbursed losses on the mortgage loans that were previously allocated to reduce the certificate principal amounts of those classes, together with interest.

Fourth: Class A-S trust component: To pay amounts on the Class A-S trust component and, thus, concurrently, to the Class A-S and Class PEZ certificates as follows: (a) to interest on the Class A-S trust component (and, therefore, to the Class A-S and Class PEZ certificates pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S trust component) in the amount of its interest entitlement; (b) to the extent of funds allocable to principal remaining after distributions in respect of principal to each class with a higher priority (in this case, the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates), to principal on the Class A-S trust component (and, therefore, to the Class A-S and Class PEZ certificates pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S trust component) until its certificate principal amount has been reduced to zero; and (c) to reimburse the Class A-S trust component (and, therefore, the Class A-S and Class PEZ certificates pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S trust component) for any unreimbursed losses on the mortgage loans that were previously allocated to reduce the certificate principal amount of that trust component (and, therefore, those certificates), together with interest.

Fifth: Class B trust component: To pay amounts on the Class B trust component and, thus, concurrently, to the Class B and Class PEZ certificates as follows: (a) to interest on the Class B trust component (and, therefore, to the Class B and Class PEZ certificates pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class B trust component) in the amount of its interest entitlement; (b) to the extent of funds allocable to principal remaining after distributions in respect of principal to each class and trust component with a higher priority (in this case, the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates and the Class A-S trust component), to principal on the Class B trust component (and, therefore, to the Class B and Class PEZ certificates pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class B trust component) until its certificate principal amount has been reduced to zero; and (c) to reimburse the Class B trust component (and, therefore, the Class B and Class PEZ certificates pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class B trust component) for any unreimbursed losses on the mortgage loans that were previously allocated to reduce the certificate principal amount of that trust component (and, therefore, those certificates), together with interest.

Sixth: Class C trust component: To pay amounts on the Class C trust component and, thus, concurrently, to the Class C and Class PEZ certificates as follows: (a) to interest on the Class C trust component (and, therefore, to the Class C and Class PEZ certificates pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class C trust component) in the amount of its interest entitlement; (b) to the extent of funds allocable to principal remaining after distributions in respect of principal to each class and trust component with a higher priority (in this case, the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates and the Class A-S and Class B trust components), to principal on the Class C trust component (and, therefore, to the Class C and Class PEZ certificates pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class C trust component) until its certificate principal amount has been reduced to zero; and (c) to reimburse the Class C trust component (and,

S-48

		therefore, the Class C and Class PEZ certificates pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class C trust component) for any unreimbursed losses on the mortgage loans that were previously allocated to reduce the certificate principal amount of that trust component (and, therefore, those certificates), together with interest.
		Seventh: Class D and Class X-D certificates: To pay amounts on the Class D and Class X-D certificates as follows: (a) to interest on the Class D and Class X-D certificates in the amount of, and pro rata in accordance with, their respective interest entitlements; (b) to the extent of funds allocable to principal remaining after distributions in respect of principal to each class and trust component with a higher priority (in this case, the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates and the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components), to principal on the Class D certificates until their certificate principal amount has been reduced to zero; and (c) to reimburse the Class D certificates for any unreimbursed losses on the mortgage loans that were previously allocated to reduce the certificate principal amount of the Class D certificates, together with interest.
		Eighth: Non-offered certificates: in the amounts and order of priority described in “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions—Payment Priorities” in this prospectus supplement.
		For more information, see “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions—Payment Priorities” in this prospectus supplement.
B.	Interest and Principal
	Entitlements	A description of each class’s and trust component’s interest entitlement can be found in “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions—Method, Timing and Amount” and “—Distributions—Payment Priorities” in this prospectus supplement. As described in that section, there are circumstances in which your interest entitlement for a distribution date could be less than one full month’s interest at the related pass-through rate on your certificate’s principal amount or notional amount (or, in the case of the Class PEZ certificates, the related pass-through rates on the applicable percentage interest of the related certificate principal amounts of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components).
		On each distribution date, the Class PEZ certificates will be entitled to receive a proportionate share of the amounts distributable on the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components, and therefore, of the amounts that would otherwise have been distributed as interest and principal payments on the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates had an exchange not occurred, as described under “Description of the Offered Certificates—Exchangeable Certificates” in this prospectus supplement. Any such allocations of principal and interest as between the Class PEZ certificates, on the one hand, and the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates, on the other, will have no effect on the principal or interest entitlements of any other class of certificates.
		A description of the amount of principal required to be distributed to the classes entitled to principal on a particular distribution date also can be found in “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions—Method, Timing and Amount” and “—Distributions—Payment Priorities” in this prospectus supplement.

S-49

C.	Servicing and Administrative
	Fees	The master servicer and special servicer are entitled to a master servicing fee and a special servicing fee, respectively, generally from the interest payments on the mortgage loans (or any serviced loan combinations, if applicable) in the case of the master servicer, and from the collection account in the case of the special servicer; provided, that the special servicer for this securitization transaction (acting in such capacity) will not receive any special servicing fee with respect to any outside serviced mortgage loan. The master servicing fee for each distribution date will be calculated based on: (i) the stated principal balance of each mortgage loan in the issuing entity and each serviced companion loan; and (ii) the related master servicing fee rate, which includes any sub-servicing fee rate and primary servicing fee rate and ranges on a loan-by-loan basis from 0.0050% to 0.0725% per annum. The master servicing fee rate includes (a) any sub-servicing fee rate and primary servicing fee rate, and (b) with respect to an outside serviced mortgage loan, the servicing fee rate payable to the outside servicer. The special servicing fee for each distribution date is calculated based on the stated principal balance of each specially serviced loan or REO loan (that is not part of an outside serviced loan combination) and the special servicing fee rate, which is equal to the greater of 0.25% per annum and the rate that would result in a special servicing fee of $3,500 for the related month.
		The master servicer and special servicer are also entitled to additional fees and amounts, including income on the amounts held in permitted investments to the extent specified in this prospectus supplement and the pooling and servicing agreement. In addition, the special servicer is entitled to (a) liquidation fees from (and generally calculated at a rate of 1.0% applied to) the recovery of liquidation proceeds, insurance proceeds, condemnation proceeds and other payments in connection with a full or discounted payoff of a specially serviced loan or REO loan (that is not part of an outside serviced loan combination) and (b) workout fees from (and generally calculated at a rate of 1.0% applied to) collections on any mortgage loan or companion loan serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization transaction, that had previously been a specially serviced loan, but had been worked out, in each case net of certain amounts and calculated as further described under “Transaction Parties—Servicing Compensation, Operating Advisor Compensation and Payment of Expenses” in this prospectus supplement. The outside special servicer for any outside serviced mortgage loan will be entitled to receive comparable (but not necessarily identical) special servicing fees, liquidation fees and workout fees and other additional fees and amounts with respect to that outside serviced mortgage loan pursuant to the terms of the applicable outside servicing agreement.
		The operating advisor is entitled to a fee from general collections on the mortgage loans for each distribution date, calculated based on the outstanding principal balance of each mortgage loan in the issuing entity and the operating advisor fee rate of 0.00165% per annum.
		In addition, the master servicer will pay to the Commercial Real Estate Finance Council (“CREFC®”) an intellectual property royalty license fee in connection with the use of CREFC® names and trademarks from general collections on the mortgage loans for each distribution date, calculated based on the stated principal balance of each mortgage loan in the issuing entity at the intellectual royalty license fee rate of 0.0005% per annum.

S-50

		The fees of the trustee and the certificate administrator will be payable monthly from general collections on the mortgage loans for each distribution date, calculated on the outstanding principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans in the issuing entity and the trustee/certificate administrator fee rate of 0.0046% per annum.
		Each of the master servicing fee, the special servicing fee, the operating advisor fee, the CREFC® intellectual property royalty license fee and the trustee/certificate administrator fee will be calculated on the same interest accrual basis as the related mortgage loan (or any related serviced companion loan) and prorated for any partial period. See “Transaction Parties—Servicing Compensation, Operating Advisor Compensation and Payment of Expenses” in this prospectus supplement.
		The administrative fee rate will be the sum of the master servicing fee rate (which, with respect to each outside serviced mortgage loan, includes the per annum servicing fee rate payable to the outside servicer), the operating advisor fee rate, the CREFC® intellectual property royalty license fee rate and the trustee/certificate administrator fee rate and is set forth on Annex A to this prospectus supplement for each mortgage loan.
		The master servicing fees, the special servicing fees, the liquidation fees, the workout fees, the operating advisor fees, the CREFC® intellectual property royalty license fee, and the trustee/certificate administrator fees will be paid prior to distributions to certificateholders of the available distribution amount as described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Withdrawals from the Collection Account” and “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions—Method, Timing and Amount” in this prospectus supplement.
		See “Transaction Parties—Servicing Compensation, Operating Advisor Compensation and Payment of Expenses” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.
D.	Prepayment Premiums	The manner in which any prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges received prior to the related determination date will be allocated on each distribution date to the Class X-A certificates, on the one hand, and certain of the classes of certificates and trust components entitled to principal, on the other hand, is described in “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions—Prepayment Premiums” in this prospectus supplement.
Advances
A.	Principal and Interest Advances	The master servicer is required to advance delinquent monthly debt service payments with respect to each mortgage loan in the issuing entity (including the outside serviced mortgage loans) but not any companion loan(s), as described below under “—Property Advances on the Outside Serviced Loan Combinations,” if it determines that the advance will be recoverable from collections on that mortgage loan. The master servicer will not be required to advance amounts deemed non-recoverable from related loan collections. The master servicer will not be required or permitted to make an advance for balloon payments, default interest, excess interest, any other interest in excess of a mortgage loan’s regular interest rate, prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges or delinquent monthly debt service payments on the companion loan(s). In the event that the master servicer fails to make any required

S-51

		advance, the trustee will be required to make that advance unless the trustee determines that the advance is non-recoverable from related loan collections. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances” in this prospectus supplement. If an advance is made, the master servicer will not advance its servicing fee, but will advance the certificate administrator’s fee, the trustee’s fee, the operating advisor’s fee and the CREFC® intellectual property royalty license fee. The master servicer or trustee, as applicable, will be entitled to reimbursement from general collections on the mortgage loans for advances determined to be non-recoverable from related loan collections. This may result in losses on your certificates.
B.	Property Protection Advances	The master servicer also is required to make advances to pay delinquent real estate taxes and assessments, ground lease rent payments, condominium assessments, hazard insurance premiums and similar expenses necessary to protect and maintain the mortgaged property, to maintain the lien on the mortgaged property or enforce the related mortgage loan documents with respect to the mortgage loans and any companion loans (other than those that are part of an outside serviced loan combination), unless the advance is determined to be non-recoverable from related loan proceeds. In the event that the master servicer fails to make a required advance of this type, the trustee will be required to make that advance unless the trustee determines that the advance is non-recoverable from related loan collections. The master servicer is not required, but in certain circumstances is permitted, to advance amounts deemed non-recoverable from related loan collections. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances” in this prospectus supplement. The special servicer will have no obligation to make any property protection advances, provided that, in an urgent or emergency situation requiring the making of a property protection advance, the special servicer may make a property protection advance and will be entitled to reimbursement from the master servicer for such advance. The master servicer, the special servicer or trustee, as applicable will be entitled to reimbursement from general collections on the mortgage loans for advances determined to be non-recoverable from related loan collections. This may result in losses on your certificates.
C.	Interest on Advances	The master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee, as applicable, will be entitled to interest on all advances as described in this prospectus supplement. Interest accrued on outstanding advances may result in reductions in amounts otherwise payable on the certificates. No interest will accrue on advances with respect to principal or interest due on a mortgage loan until any grace period applicable to that mortgage loan has expired.
		The master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee will each be entitled to receive interest on advances they make at the prime rate, compounded annually. If the interest on an advance is not recovered from default interest or late payments on the mortgage loan, a shortfall will result which will have the same effect as a liquidation loss on a defaulted mortgage loan.
		See “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions—Realized Losses” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances” in this prospectus supplement.

S-52

D.	Property Advances on the
	Outside Serviced Loan
	Combinations	With respect to each outside serviced loan combination, the outside servicer under the related outside servicing agreement is required to make property protection advances with respect to the related mortgaged property or properties, unless that outside servicer determines that those advances would not be recoverable from collections on such outside serviced loan combination. If that outside servicer is required to but fails to make a required property protection advance, then (subject to a recoverability determination) the outside trustee will be required to make that property protection advance. The outside servicer and/or the outside trustee, to the extent it makes any property protection advances with respect to an outside serviced loan combination, will be entitled to receive interest on such advances in accordance with the terms of the applicable outside servicing agreement and the related co-lender agreement, which may be reimbursable out of general collections of the issuing entity. The advancing party will also be entitled to reimbursement from general collections on the mortgage loans in the issuing entity for the pro rata share allocable to the applicable outside serviced mortgage loan of any non-recoverable property protection advance made by it on the related outside serviced loan combination and interest on those advances.
		No outside servicer is required to advance delinquent monthly mortgage loan payments with respect to the related outside serviced mortgage loan.
Priority of Payments
A.	Subordination / Allocation
	of Losses	The amount available for distribution will be applied in the order described in “—Distributions—Amount and Order of Distributions” above.
		The following chart generally describes the manner in which the payment rights of certain classes of certificates and trust components will be senior or subordinate, as the case may be, to the payment rights of other classes of certificates and trust components. The chart shows entitlement to receive principal and interest (other than excess interest that accrues on a mortgage loan that has an anticipated repayment date (if any)) on any distribution date in descending order (beginning with the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class X-A certificates). Among the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class X-A certificates, payment rights of certain classes will be more particularly described in “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions” in this prospectus supplement. It also shows the manner in which mortgage loan losses are allocated in ascending order (beginning with certain Series 2015-GC33 certificates that are not being offered by this prospectus supplement). Principal losses on the mortgage loans allocated to a class of certificates or trust component will reduce the related certificate principal amount of that class or trust component. However, no such principal losses will be allocated to the Class R, Class X-A or Class X-D certificates, although loan losses will reduce the notional amount of the Class X-A certificates (to the extent such losses are allocated to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 or Class A-AB certificates or the Class A-S trust component) and the Class X-D certificates (to the extent such losses are allocated to the Class D certificates), and, therefore, the amount of interest they accrue.

S-53

*	Interest only certificates. No principal payments or realized loan losses in respect of principal will be allocated to the Class X-A and Class X-D certificates. However, mortgage loan losses will reduce the notional amounts of the Class X-A and Class X-D certificates in each case to the extent such losses reduce the certificate principal amount of a related class of principal balance certificates or a related trust component.
**	Distributions and losses allocated to a trust component will be concurrently allocated to the related classes of exchangeable certificates that evidence a percentage interest in such trust component. Distributions of principal and interest and allocations of mortgage loan losses to the Class A-S trust component will be made pro rata to the Class A-S certificates and the Class PEZ certificates in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S trust component. Distributions of principal and interest and allocations of mortgage loan losses to the Class B trust component will be made pro rata to the Class B certificates and the Class PEZ certificates in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class B trust component. Distributions of principal and interest and allocations of mortgage loan losses to the Class C trust component will be made pro rata to the Class C certificates and the Class PEZ certificates in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class C trust component. See “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions” in this prospectus supplement.
***	Other than the Class R certificates.
No other form of credit enhancement will be available for the benefit of the holders of the offered certificates.
See “Description of the Offered Certificates—Subordination” in this prospectus supplement.

S-54

		To the extent funds are available on a subsequent distribution date for distribution on your offered certificates, you will be reimbursed for any losses allocated to your offered certificates (or, in the case of the Class PEZ certificates, allocated to the percentage interests evidenced thereby in the Class A-S, Class B and/or Class C trust components, as applicable) with interest at the pass-through rate on those offered certificates or trust components.
B.	Shortfalls in Available Funds	In addition to losses caused by mortgage loan defaults, shortfalls in payments to holders of certificates may occur as a result of: the master servicer’s, the special servicer’s and the trustee’s right to receive payments of interest on unreimbursed advances (to the extent not covered by default interest and late payment charges or other amounts collected from borrowers that are not paid to the master servicer or the special servicer as compensation, to the extent described in this prospectus supplement); the special servicer’s right to compensation with respect to mortgage loans which are or have been serviced by the special servicer; the rights of any outside servicer, outside trustee and/or outside special servicer to receive payments of interest on unreimbursed property protection advances, servicing and/or special servicing compensation and/or reimbursement of certain amounts with respect to an outside serviced loan combination in accordance with the related co-lender agreement and the applicable outside servicing agreement; a modification of a mortgage loan’s interest rate or principal balance; or other unanticipated expenses of the issuing entity. These shortfalls, if they occur, would reduce distributions to the classes of certificates or trust components with the lowest payment priorities. In addition, prepayment interest shortfalls that are not covered by certain compensating interest payments made by the master servicer are required to be allocated to the interest-bearing certificates (other than the Class A-S, Class B, Class PEZ and Class C certificates) and the trust components (and, therefore, the Class A-S, Class B, Class PEZ and Class C certificates), on a pro rata basis, to reduce the amount of the interest payment on such classes of certificates and trust components.
Additional Aspects of the Certificates
A.	Information Available to
	Certificateholders	On each distribution date, the certificate administrator will prepare and make available to each certificateholder a statement as to the distributions being made on that date. Additionally, under certain circumstances, certificateholders may be entitled to certain other information regarding the issuing entity. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Reports to Certificateholders; Available Information” in this prospectus supplement.
B.	Optional Termination	On any distribution date on which the aggregate unpaid principal balance of the mortgage loans remaining in the issuing entity is less than 1.0% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date (excluding for purposes of this calculation, The Decoration & Design Building mortgage loan, which as of the closing date, has a stated maturity date beyond the tenth anniversary of the closing date), certain specified persons will have the option to purchase all of the mortgage loans (and all property acquired through exercise of remedies in respect of any mortgage loan) remaining in the issuing entity at the price specified in this prospectus supplement. Exercise of this option will terminate the issuing entity and retire the then outstanding certificates.

S-55

		If the aggregate certificate principal amounts of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class D certificates and the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components (and, correspondingly, the Class A-S, Class B, Class C and Class PEZ certificates) and the notional amounts of the Class X-A and Class X-D certificates have been reduced to zero, and the master servicer is paid a fee specified in the pooling and servicing agreement, the issuing entity could also be terminated in connection with an exchange of all the then-outstanding certificates (but excluding the Class R certificates) for the mortgage loans remaining in the issuing entity, but all of the holders of those classes of outstanding certificates would have to voluntarily participate in the exchange.
C.	Required Repurchase or
	Substitution of Mortgage
	Loans	Under the circumstances described in this prospectus supplement, the applicable sponsor (or KGS Holdings, L.P., as guarantor of the repurchase and substitution obligations of KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC, or RAIT Financial Trust, as guarantor of the repurchase and substitution obligations of RAIT Funding, LLC) will be required to repurchase or substitute for any mortgage loan for which it cannot remedy a breach of a representation and warranty or a document defect, that, in each case, materially and adversely affects (or is deemed to materially and adversely affect) the value of that mortgage loan (or related REO property) or the interests of the certificateholders in that mortgage loan. Under certain circumstances, the applicable sponsor may elect to make a cash payment (a “loss of value payment”) in lieu of repurchasing or substituting any such mortgage loan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions” in this prospectus supplement.
D.	Sale of Defaulted Mortgage
	Loans and REO Properties	Pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement, the special servicer is required to solicit offers for defaulted mortgage loans serviced thereunder (or, in the case of such a defaulted mortgage loan that is included in a serviced pari passu loan combination, such defaulted mortgage loan and any related serviced pari passu companion loan(s)) and related REO properties and accept the first (and, if multiple offers are received, the highest) cash offer from any person that constitutes a fair price for the defaulted serviced mortgage loan (or defaulted serviced pari passu loan combination or relevant portion thereof, if applicable) or related REO property, determined as described in “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans—Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties” in this prospectus supplement, unless the special servicer determines, in accordance with the servicing standard, that rejection of such offer would be in the best interests of the certificateholders and any related affected companion loan holder(s) (as a collective whole as if such certificateholders and such serviced pari passu companion loan holder constituted a single lender).
		If a mortgage loan that is part of a serviced pari passu loan combination (if any) becomes a defaulted mortgage loan, and if the special servicer decides to sell such defaulted mortgage loan as described in the prior paragraph, then the special servicer will be required to sell any related serviced pari passu companion loan(s) together with such defaulted mortgage loan as a single whole loan. In connection with any such sale, the special servicer will be required to follow the procedures set forth under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon

S-56

		Mortgage Loans—Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties” in this prospectus supplement.
		Pursuant to the co-lender agreement with respect to each serviced AB loan combination, the holder of such subordinate companion loan has a right to purchase the related defaulted mortgage loan (together with any related serviced pari passu companion loan) as described in “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” in this prospectus supplement.
		Pursuant to the related outside servicing agreement, the party acting as outside special servicer with respect to any outside serviced loan combination may offer to sell to any person (or may offer to purchase) for cash such outside serviced loan combination during such time as such loan combination constitutes a defaulted mortgage loan under the related outside servicing agreement and, in connection with any such sale, the outside special servicer is required to sell both the related outside serviced mortgage loan and the related pari passu companion loan(s) as a single whole loan.
		Pursuant to each mezzanine loan intercreditor agreement with respect to the mortgage loans with mezzanine indebtedness, the holder of the related mezzanine loan has the right to purchase the related mortgage loan as described in “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans—Additional Indebtedness” in this prospectus supplement. Additionally, in the case of mortgage loans that permit certain equity owners of the borrower to incur future mezzanine debt as described in “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans—Additional Indebtedness” in this prospectus supplement, the related mezzanine lender may have the option to purchase the related mortgage loan after certain defaults.
		See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans—Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” in this prospectus supplement.
E.	Registration and
	Denominations	The offered certificates will be issued in book-entry form through The Depository Trust Company, or DTC, and its participants. You may hold your certificates through: (i) DTC in the United States; or (ii) Clearstream Banking, société anonyme or Euroclear Bank, as operator of the Euroclear System, in Europe. Transfers within DTC, Clearstream Banking, société anonyme or Euroclear Bank, as operator of the Euroclear System, will be made in accordance with the usual rules and operating procedures of those systems. See “Description of the Offered Certificates—Delivery, Form, Transfer and Denomination—Book-Entry Registration” in this prospectus supplement and “Description of the Certificates—Book-Entry Registration” in the prospectus. All the offered certificates will be issued in registered form without coupons. The offered certificates (other than the Class X-A and Class X-D certificates) that are initially offered and sold will be issued in minimum denominations of $10,000 and integral multiples of $1 in excess of $10,000. The Class X-A and Class X-D certificates will be issued in minimum denominations of authorized initial notional amount of not less than $1,000,000 and in integral multiples of $1 in excess of $1,000,000.

S-57

Other Investment Considerations
Potential Conflicts of Interest	The relationships involving the parties to this transaction and/or the securitization of any related companion loan, and the activities of those parties or their affiliates, may give rise to certain conflicts of interest. These conflicts of interests may arise from, among other things, the following relationships and activities:
	·	the ownership of any certificates by the depositor, any sponsor, any originator, any underwriter, the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, any outside servicer, any outside special servicer, any outside operating advisor or any of their respective affiliates;
	·	the ownership of, or any interests in, or securities backed by, any companion loans or mezzanine debt by any sponsor, any originator, any underwriter, the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, any outside servicer, any outside special servicer, any outside operating advisor or any of their respective affiliates;
	·	the relationships, including financial dealings, of any sponsor, any originator, the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, any outside servicer, any outside special servicer, any outside operating advisor or any of their respective affiliates with any borrower, any non-recourse carveout guarantor or any of their respective affiliates;
	·	the relationships, including financial dealings, of the sponsors, any originator, the underwriters and their respective affiliates with each other;
	·	the decision or obligation of the special servicer to take actions at the direction or recommendation of the applicable directing holder or the holder of any serviced companion loan or its representative;
	·	the expected initial controlling class representative’s engagement of any party to this securitization transaction as an independent contractor to conduct due diligence with respect to certain underlying mortgage loans;
	·	fee-sharing arrangements between one or more certificateholders or their respective representative and the special servicer;
	·	the broker-dealer activities of the underwriters and their affiliates, including taking long or short positions in the certificates or entering into credit derivative transactions with respect to the certificates;
	·	the opportunity of the initial investor in the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates to request the removal or re-sizing of or other changes to the features of some or all of the mortgage loans or to receive price adjustments or cost mitigation arrangements in connection with accepting certain mortgage loans in the mortgage pool; and
	·	the activities of the master servicer, special servicer, operating advisor, sponsors, originators or any of their respective affiliates in connection with any other transaction and, with respect to any outside serviced loan combination, the activities of any related

S-58

		outside servicer, outside special servicer, outside operating advisor or any of their respective affiliates in connection with any other transaction.
	See “Risk Factors—Interests and Incentives of the Originators, the Sponsors and Their Affiliates May Not Be Aligned with Your Interests,” “—Interests and Incentives of the Underwriter Entities May Not Be Aligned with Your Interests,” “—Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, any Outside Servicer and any Outside Special Servicer,” “—Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Operating Advisor,” “—Potential Conflicts of Interest of a Directing Holder, any Outside Controlling Class Representative and any Companion Loan Holder,” “—Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Selection of the Underlying Mortgage Loans,” “—Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment,” “—Rights of the Directing Holder and the Operating Advisor Could Adversely Affect Your Investment,” “—Loan Combinations Pose Special Risks—Realization on the Mortgage Loan That Is Part of a Serviced Loan Combination May Be Adversely Affected by the Rights of the Related Serviced Companion Loan Holder,” and “—Loan Combinations Pose Special Risks—Rights of any Outside Controlling Class Representative Under any Outside Servicing Agreement Could Adversely Affect Your Investment” in this prospectus supplement.
Material Federal Income
Tax Consequences	Two (2) separate real estate mortgage investment conduit (commonly known as a REMIC) elections will be made with respect to the assets of the issuing entity. The designations for each REMIC created under the pooling and servicing agreement (each, a “Trust REMIC”) are as follows:
	·	The lower-tier REMIC (the “Lower-Tier REMIC”) will hold the mortgage loans (excluding any post-anticipated repayment date excess interest) and certain other assets of the issuing entity and will issue certain classes of uncertificated regular interests to a second REMIC (the “Upper-Tier REMIC”).
	·	The Upper-Tier REMIC will hold the Lower-Tier REMIC regular interests and will issue the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB, Class X-A, Class D, Class X-D, Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates and the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components as classes of regular interests in the Upper-Tier REMIC.
	The portions of the issuing entity consisting of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components and the related distribution account, beneficial ownership of which is represented by the Class A-S, Class B, Class PEZ and Class C certificates, will be treated as a grantor trust for federal income tax purposes, as further described under “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences” in this prospectus supplement.
	Pertinent federal income tax consequences of an investment in the offered certificates include:
	·	Each class of offered certificates (other than the exchangeable certificates) and the trust components will constitute REMIC “regular interests”.

S-59

	·	The offered certificates (other than the exchangeable certificates) and the trust components will be treated as newly originated debt instruments for federal income tax purposes.
	·	Each class of exchangeable certificates will evidence beneficial ownership of one or more trust components which will be treated as a grantor trust for federal income tax purposes.
	·	You will be required to report income on your offered certificates in accordance with the accrual method of accounting.
	It is anticipated, for federal income tax purposes, that the Class C trust component and the Class X-A, Class D and Class X-D certificates will be issued with original issue discount, and that the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates and the Class A-S and Class B trust components will be issued at a premium.
	See “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences” in this prospectus supplement.
Yield Considerations	You should carefully consider the matters described under “Risk Factors—Your Yield May Be Affected by Defaults, Prepayments and Other Factors” and “Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations” in this prospectus supplement, which may affect significantly the yields on your investment.
ERISA Considerations	Fiduciaries of employee benefit plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, commonly known as ERISA, or plans subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or governmental plans (as defined in Section 3(32) of ERISA) and other plans that are subject to any federal, state or local law which is, to a material extent, similar to the fiduciary or prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, should carefully review with their legal advisors whether the purchase or holding of the offered certificates could give rise to a transaction prohibited or not otherwise permissible under ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or similar law.
	The U.S. Department of Labor has granted substantially identical administrative exemptions to a predecessor of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Prohibited Transaction Exemption (“PTE”) 91-23 (April 18, 1991), and to Goldman, Sachs & Co., PTE 89-88 (October 17, 1989), both as amended by PTE 2013-08 (July 9, 2013) (collectively, the “Underwriter Exemption”), which may exempt from the application of certain of the prohibited transaction provisions of Section 406 of ERISA and the excise taxes imposed on such prohibited transactions by Sections 4975(a) and (b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, transactions relating to the purchase, sale and holding of pass-through certificates underwritten by a selling group of which Citigroup Global Markets Inc. or Goldman, Sachs & Co. serves as a manager or co-manager, and the servicing and operation of related mortgage pools, so long as certain conditions are met. See “ERISA Considerations” in this prospectus supplement.
Ratings	It is a condition to the issuance of the offered certificates that each class of offered certificates receives an investment grade rating from one or more nationally recognized statistical rating organizations engaged by the depositor to rate the offered certificates.

S-60

Credit ratings referenced throughout this prospectus supplement are forward-looking opinions about credit risk and express a rating agency’s opinion about the willingness and ability of an issuer of securities to meet its financial obligations in full and on time. Ratings are not indications of investment merit and are not buy, sell or hold recommendations, a measure of asset value or an indication of the suitability of an investment. Any rating agency that rates the certificates may, in its discretion, lower or withdraw its rating at any time as to any class of certificates. None of the relevant parties (including, without limitation, the issuing entity, the depositor, the sponsors, the servicers, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the operating advisor and their affiliates) will be required to monitor any changes to any ratings on the certificates.

A securities rating on mortgage pass-through certificates addresses credit risk and the likelihood of full and timely payment to the applicable certificateholders of all distributions of interest at the applicable pass-through rate on the certificates or related trust component(s) in question on each distribution date and, except in the case of the interest-only certificates, the ultimate payment in full of the certificate principal amount of each class of certificates in question on a date that is not later than the rated final distribution date with respect to such class of certificates. Any security rating assigned to the offered certificates should be evaluated independently of any other security rating. A securities rating on mortgage pass-through certificates does not address the tax attributes of the certificates in question or the receipt of any default interest or prepayment premium or constitute an assessment of the likelihood, timing or frequency of prepayments on the related mortgage loans. A securities rating on mortgage pass-through certificates does not address the frequency of prepayments (whether voluntary or involuntary) on the related mortgage loans, the degree to which the prepayments might differ from those originally anticipated, the yield to maturity that purchasers may experience as a result of the rate of principal prepayments, the likelihood of collection of default interest, excess interest, late payment charges, prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges, or the tax treatment of the certificates in question.

A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and the assigning rating agency may revise, downgrade, qualify or withdraw a rating at any time.

Nationally recognized statistical rating organizations that were not engaged by the depositor to rate the offered certificates may nevertheless issue unsolicited credit ratings on one or more classes of offered certificates, relying on information they receive pursuant to Rule 17g-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise. If any such unsolicited ratings are issued, we cannot assure you that they will not be different from any ratings assigned by a rating agency engaged by the depositor. The issuance of unsolicited ratings by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization on a class of the offered certificates that are lower than ratings assigned by the rating agencies engaged by the depositor may adversely impact the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of that class. As part of the process of obtaining ratings for the offered certificates, the depositor had initial discussions with and submitted certain materials to five nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. Based on preliminary feedback from those nationally recognized statistical rating organizations at that time, the depositor selected three of those nationally recognized statistical rating organizations to rate the offered certificates (or, in the case of any particular nationally recognized statistical rating organization

S-61

so selected, certain classes of the offered certificates) but not the others, due in part to their initial subordination levels for the various classes of the offered and non-offered certificates. Had the depositor selected alternative nationally recognized statistical rating organizations to rate the offered certificates, we cannot assure you as to the ratings that such other nationally recognized statistical rating organizations would have ultimately assigned to the offered certificates. In the case of one of the three nationally recognized statistical rating organizations selected by the depositor, the depositor has requested ratings for only certain classes of the offered certificates, due in part to the initial subordination levels provided by such nationally recognized statistical rating organization for the various classes of the offered certificates. If the depositor had selected such nationally recognized statistical rating organization to rate the remaining classes of offered certificates not rated by it, its ratings of such certificates may have been different, and potentially lower, than those ratings ultimately assigned to such certificates by the other nationally recognized statistical rating organizations engaged to rate such certificates. Although unsolicited ratings may be issued by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization, a nationally recognized statistical rating organization might be more likely to issue an unsolicited rating if it was not selected after having provided preliminary feedback to the depositor.

Neither the depositor nor any other person or entity will have any duty to notify you if any nationally recognized statistical rating organization issues, or delivers notice of its intention to issue, unsolicited ratings on one or more classes of offered certificates after the date of this prospectus supplement. In no event will rating agency confirmations from any nationally recognized statistical rating organization (other than the engaged rating agencies or, in the case of any outside serviced loan combination, the rating agencies engaged by the depositor for the securitization of the related outside serviced companion loan) be a condition to any action, or the exercise of any right, power or privilege by any person or entity under the pooling and servicing agreement.

Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Commission may determine that any or all of the rating agencies engaged by the depositor no longer qualify as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization or are no longer qualified to rate the offered certificates, and that determination also may have an adverse effect on the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of the offered certificates.

A security rating does not represent any assessment of the yield to maturity that investors may experience or the possibility that the holders of the Class X-A or Class X-D certificates might not fully recover their initial investment in the event of delinquencies or defaults, prepayments (both voluntary (to the extent permitted) and involuntary), or losses in respect of the mortgage loans. As described in this prospectus supplement, the amounts payable with respect to the Class X-A and Class X-D certificates consist only of interest.

The Class X-A and Class X-D certificates are only entitled to interest distributions. If any of the mortgage loans were to prepay in the initial month after the closing date, with the result that the holders of the Class X-A and/or Class X-D certificates receive only a single month’s interest, and therefore suffer a nearly complete loss of their investment, all amounts “due” to such holders will nevertheless have been paid, and such result is consistent with the ratings received on the Class X-A and Class X-D certificates. The notional amounts of the Class X-A and Class

S-62

	X-D certificates on which interest is calculated may be reduced by the allocation of realized losses and prepayments, whether voluntary or involuntary. The ratings of the Class X-A and Class X-D certificates do not address the timing or magnitude of reductions of such notional amounts, but only the obligation to pay interest timely on the notional amounts as so reduced from time to time. Therefore, the ratings of the Class X-A and Class X-D certificates should be evaluated independently from similar ratings on other types of securities.
	See “Risk Factors—Your Yield May Be Affected by Defaults, Prepayments and Other Factors,” “—Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations May Assign Different Ratings to the Certificates; Ratings of the Certificates Reflect Only the Views of the Applicable Rating Agencies as of the Dates Such Ratings Were Issued; Ratings May Affect ERISA Eligibility; Ratings May Be Downgraded” and “Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations” in this prospectus supplement and “Risk Factors—The Investment Performance of Your Offered Certificates Will Depend Upon Payments, Defaults and Losses on the Underlying Mortgage Loans; and Those Payments, Defaults and Losses May Be Highly Unpredictable,” “—The Nature of Ratings Are Limited and Will Not Guarantee that You Will Receive Any Projected Return on Your Offered Certificates,” “—The Ratings of Your Offered Certificates May Be Lowered or Withdrawn, or Your Certificates May Receive an Unsolicited Rating, Which May Adversely Affect the Liquidity, Market Value and Regulatory Characteristics of Your Offered Certificates” and “Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations” in the prospectus.
Legal Investment	No class of the offered certificates will constitute “mortgage related securities” for purposes of the Secondary Mortgage Market Enhancement Act of 1984, as amended. If your investment activities are subject to legal investment laws and regulations, regulatory capital requirements, or review by regulatory authorities, then you may be subject to restrictions on investment in the offered certificates. You should consult your own legal advisors for assistance in determining the suitability of and consequences to you of the purchase, ownership, and sale of the offered certificates. See “Legal Investment” in this prospectus supplement and in the prospectus.
	The issuing entity will be relying on an exclusion or exemption from the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act contained in Section 3(c)(5) of the Investment Company Act or Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act, although there may be additional exclusions or exemptions available to the issuing entity. The issuing entity is being structured so as not to constitute a “covered fund” for purposes of the Volcker Rule under the Dodd-Frank Act (both as defined in “Risk Factors—Legal and Regulatory Provisions Affecting Investors Could Adversely Affect the Liquidity of the Offered Certificates” in this prospectus supplement).

S-63

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

S-64

Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the following risks and the risks described in “Risk Factors” in the prospectus before making an investment decision. In particular, distributions on your certificates will depend on payments received on, and other recoveries with respect to, the mortgage loans. Therefore, you should carefully consider the risk factors relating to the mortgage loans and the mortgaged properties.

If any of the following events or circumstances identified as risks actually occur or materialize, your investment could be materially and adversely affected. We note that additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us may also impair your investment.

If you are considering an investment in a class of exchangeable certificates you should carefully consider the risks that are specifically applicable to the related class(es) of certificates exchangeable therefor, since they would generally apply to your certificates if you make an exchange.

This prospectus supplement also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including the risks described below and elsewhere in this prospectus supplement.

The Offered Certificates May Not Be a Suitable Investment for You

The offered certificates are not suitable investments for all investors. In particular, you should not purchase any class of offered certificates unless you understand and are able to bear the risk that the yield to maturity and the aggregate amount and timing of distributions on the offered certificates are subject to material variability from period to period and give rise to the potential for significant loss over the life of the offered certificates. The interaction of the foregoing factors and their effects are impossible to predict and are likely to change from time to time. As a result, an investment in the offered certificates involves substantial risks and uncertainties and should be considered only by sophisticated institutional investors with substantial investment experience with similar types of securities and who have conducted appropriate due diligence on the mortgage loans and the offered certificates.

The Offered Certificates Are Limited Obligations

The offered certificates, when issued, will represent beneficial interests in the issuing entity. The offered certificates will not represent an interest in, or obligation of, the sponsors, the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the underwriters, or any of their respective affiliates, or any other person. The primary assets of the issuing entity will be the notes evidencing the mortgage loans, and the primary security and source of payment for the mortgage loans will be the mortgaged properties and the other collateral described in this prospectus supplement. Payments on the offered certificates are expected to be derived from payments made by the borrowers on the mortgage loans. We cannot assure you that the cash flow from the mortgaged properties and the proceeds of any sale or refinancing of the mortgaged properties will be sufficient to pay the principal of, and interest on, the mortgage loans or to distribute in full the amounts of interest and principal to which the holders of the offered certificates are entitled. See “Description of the Certificates—General” in the prospectus.

The Volatile Economy, Credit Crisis and Downturn in the Real Estate Market Have Adversely Affected and May Continue to Adversely Affect the Value of CMBS

In recent years, the real estate and securitization markets, including the market for commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), as well as global financial markets and the economy generally, have experienced significant dislocations, illiquidity and volatility. The United States economic recovery has been weak and may not be sustainable for any specific period of time, and the global or United States economy could slip into an even more significant recession. Declining real estate values, coupled with diminished availability of leverage and/or refinancings for commercial and multifamily real estate have resulted in increased delinquencies and defaults on commercial and multifamily mortgage loans. In addition, the downturn in the general economy has affected the financial strength of many commercial and multifamily real estate tenants and has resulted in increased vacancies, decreased rents and/or other declines in income from, or the value of, commercial and multifamily real estate. Any continued downturn may lead to decreased occupancy, decreased rents or other declines in income from, or the value of, commercial and multifamily real estate, which would likely have an adverse effect on CMBS

S-65

that are backed by loans secured by such commercial and multifamily real estate and thus affect the liquidity and/or values of such CMBS.

Additionally, decreases in the value of commercial properties and the tightening by commercial real estate lenders of underwriting standards have prevented many commercial mortgage borrowers from refinancing their mortgages. A very substantial amount of U.S. mortgage loans, with balloon payment obligations in excess of their respective current property values, are maturing over the coming three years. These circumstances have increased delinquency and default rates of securitized commercial mortgage loans, and may lead to widespread commercial mortgage defaults. In addition, the declines in commercial real estate values have resulted in reduced borrower equity, hindering a borrower’s ability to refinance in an environment of increasingly restrictive lending standards and giving them less incentive to cure delinquencies and avoid foreclosure. Higher loan-to-value ratios are likely to result in lower recoveries on foreclosure, and an increase in loss severities above those that would have been realized had commercial property values remained the same or continued to increase. Defaults, delinquencies and losses have further decreased property values, thereby resulting in additional defaults by commercial mortgage borrowers, further credit constraints, further declines in property values and further adverse effects on the perception of the value of CMBS. Even if the real estate market does recover, the mortgaged properties and therefore, the certificates, may decline in value. Any further economic downturn may adversely affect the financial resources of the borrowers under the mortgage loans and may result in the inability of the borrowers to make principal and interest payments on the mortgage loans. In the event of default by the borrower under a mortgage loan, the certificateholders would likely suffer a loss on their investment.

As a result of all of these factors, we cannot assure you that a dislocation in the CMBS market will not re-occur or become more severe.

External Factors May Adversely Affect the Value and Liquidity of Your Investment

Due to factors not directly relating to the offered certificates or the underlying mortgage loans, the market value of the offered certificates can decline even if the offered certificates, the mortgage loans or the mortgaged properties are performing at or above your expectations.

Global, National and Local Economic Factors

The global financial markets have recently experienced increased volatility due to uncertainty surrounding the level and sustainability of the sovereign debt of various countries. Much of this uncertainty has related to certain countries that participate in the European Monetary Union and whose sovereign debt is generally denominated in Euros, the common currency shared by members of that union. In addition, some economists, observers and market participants have expressed concerns regarding the sustainability of the monetary union and the common currency in their current form. Concerns regarding sovereign debt may spread to other countries at any time. Furthermore, many state and local governments in the United States are experiencing, and are expected to continue to experience, severe budgetary strain. One or more states could default on their debt, or one or more significant local governments could default on their debt or seek relief from their debt under Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended (the “Bankruptcy Code”) or by agreement with their creditors. Any or all of the circumstances described above may lead to further volatility in or disruption of the credit markets at any time.

Risks to the Financial Markets Relating to Terrorist Attacks

Future terrorist activities may occur in the United States or abroad. It is impossible to predict whether, or the extent to which, future terrorist activities may occur in the United States or abroad and/or any consequent actions on the part of the United States Government and others, including military action, could have on general economic conditions, real estate markets, particular business segments (including those that are important to the performance of commercial mortgage loans) and/or insurance costs and the availability of insurance coverage for terrorist acts. Among other things, reduced investor confidence could result in substantial volatility in securities markets and a decline in real estate-related investments. In addition, reduced consumer confidence, as well as a heightened concern for personal safety, could result in a material decline in personal spending and travel.

S-66

Other Events May Affect Your Investment

Moreover, other types of events, domestic or international, may affect general economic conditions and financial markets:

· Wars, revolts, insurrections, armed conflicts, energy supply or price disruptions, terrorism, political crises, natural disasters and man-made disasters may have an adverse effect on the mortgaged properties and/or your certificates;

· Trading activity associated with indices of CMBS may drive spreads on those indices wider than spreads on CMBS, thereby resulting in a decrease in value of such CMBS, including your certificates, and spreads on those indices may be affected by a variety of factors, and may or may not be affected for reasons involving the commercial and multifamily real estate markets and may be affected for reasons that are unknown and cannot be discerned; and

· The market value of your certificates also may be affected by many other factors, including the then-prevailing interest rates and market perceptions of risks associated with commercial mortgage lending. A change in the market value of the certificates may be disproportionately impacted by upward or downward movements in the current interest rates.

Investors should consider that the foregoing factors may adversely affect the performance of the mortgage loans and accordingly the performance of the offered certificates.

The Certificates May Have Limited Liquidity and the Market Value of the Certificates May Decline

As described above under “—The Volatile Economy, Credit Crisis and Downturn in the Real Estate Market Have Adversely Affected and May Continue to Adversely Affect the Value of CMBS,” the secondary market for mortgage-backed securities recently experienced extremely limited liquidity. The adverse conditions described above as well as other adverse conditions could continue to severely limit the liquidity for mortgage-backed securities and cause disruptions and volatility in the market for CMBS.

Your certificates will not be listed on any national securities exchange or traded on any automated quotation systems of any registered securities association, and there is currently no secondary market for your certificates. While we have been advised by the underwriters that one or more of them, or one or more of their affiliates, currently intend to make a market in the certificates, none of the underwriters has any obligation to do so, any market-making may be discontinued at any time, and we cannot assure you that an active secondary market for the offered certificates will develop. Additionally, one or more purchasers may purchase substantial portions of one or more classes of offered certificates. Accordingly, you may not have an active or liquid secondary market for your certificates. Lack of liquidity could result in a substantial decrease in the market value of your certificates.

The market value of the offered certificates will also be influenced by the supply of and demand for CMBS generally. The supply of CMBS will depend on, among other things, the amount of commercial and multifamily mortgage loans, whether newly originated or held in portfolios, that are available for securitization. A number of factors will affect investors’ demand for CMBS, including:

· the availability of alternative investments that offer higher yields or are perceived as being a better credit risk, having a less volatile market value or being more liquid;

· legal and other restrictions that prohibit a particular entity from investing in CMBS or limit the amount or types of CMBS that it may acquire or require it to maintain increased capital or reserves as a result of its investment in CMBS;

· accounting standards that may affect an investor’s characterization or treatment of an investment in CMBS for financial reporting purposes;

· increased regulatory compliance burdens imposed on CMBS or securitizations generally, or on classes of securitizers, that may make securitization a less attractive financing option for commercial mortgage loans;

S-67

· investors’ perceptions regarding the commercial and multifamily real estate markets, which may be adversely affected by, among other things, a decline in real estate values or an increase in defaults and foreclosures on commercial mortgage loans;

· investors’ perceptions regarding the capital markets in general, which may be adversely affected by political, social and economic events completely unrelated to the commercial real estate markets; and

· the impact on demand generally for CMBS as a result of the existence or cancellation of government-sponsored economic programs.

If you decide to sell any offered certificates, the ability to sell your offered certificates will depend on, among other things, whether and to what extent a secondary market then exists for these offered certificates, and you may have to sell at a discount from the price you paid for reasons unrelated to the performance of the offered certificates or the mortgage loans.

The Exchangeable Certificates Are Subject to Additional Risks

The characteristics of the Class PEZ certificates will reflect, in the aggregate, the characteristics of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates. As a result, the Class PEZ certificates will be subject to the same risks as the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates described in this prospectus supplement. Investors are also encouraged to consider a number of factors that will limit a certificateholder’s ability to exchange exchangeable certificates:

· At the time of a proposed exchange, a certificateholder must own exchangeable certificates in the requisite exchangeable proportion to make the desired exchange, as described under “Description of the Offered Certificates—Exchangeable Certificates—Exchanges” in this prospectus supplement.

· A certificateholder that does not own exchangeable certificates in such requisite exchangeable proportion may be unable to obtain the necessary exchangeable certificates or may be able only to exchange the portion (if any) of its exchangeable certificates that represents such requisite exchangeable proportion. Another certificateholder may refuse to sell its certificates at a reasonable (or any) price or may be unable to sell them, or certificates may have been purchased or placed into other financial structures and thus may be unavailable. Such circumstances may prevent you from obtaining exchangeable certificates in the proportions necessary to effect an exchange.

· Exchanges will no longer be permitted following the date when the then-current principal balance of the Class A-S trust component (and, correspondingly, to the extent evidencing an interest in the Class A-S trust component, the Class A-S certificates and the applicable component of the Class PEZ certificates) is reduced to zero as a result of the payment in full of all interest and principal on that trust component.

· Certificates may only be held in authorized denominations.

· An exchange fee of $5,000 must be paid by the exchanging certificateholder to the certificate administrator in connection with each exchange of exchangeable certificates.

Subordination of Exchangeable Certificates

As described in this prospectus supplement, if you acquire any exchangeable certificates, then your rights to receive distributions of amounts collected or advanced on or in respect of the mortgage loans will be subordinated to those of the holders of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class X-A certificates. If you acquire Class B certificates, then your rights to receive distributions of amounts collected or advanced on or in respect of the mortgage loans will also be subordinated to those of the holders of the Class A-S certificates and (insofar as the Class PEZ certificates represent an interest in the Class A-S trust component) the holders of the Class PEZ certificates. If you acquire Class C certificates, then your rights to receive distributions of amounts collected or advanced on or in respect of the mortgage loans will also be subordinated to those of the holders of

S-68

the Class B certificates and (insofar as the Class PEZ certificates represent an interest in the Class A-S and Class B trust components) the holders of the Class PEZ certificates. If you acquire Class PEZ certificates, then your rights to receive distributions of amounts collected or advanced on or in respect of the mortgage loans will also be subordinated to: (a) insofar as the Class PEZ certificates represent an interest in the Class B and Class C trust components, those of the holders of the Class A-S certificates; and (b) insofar as the Class PEZ certificates represent an interest in the Class C trust component, those of the holders of the Class B certificates. See “Description of the Offered Certificates—Subordination” in this prospectus supplement.

Limited Information Causes Uncertainty

Historical Information

Some of the mortgage loans that we intend to include in the issuing entity were made to enable the related borrower to acquire the related mortgaged property, and in certain cases, the mortgaged properties were recently constructed. The underwritten net cash flows and underwritten net operating incomes for such mortgaged properties are derived principally from current rent rolls or tenant leases and the appraisers’ projected expense levels. However, we cannot assure you that actual cash flows from such mortgaged properties will meet such projected cash flows, income and expense levels or that those funds will be sufficient to meet the payment obligations of the related mortgage loans.

Accordingly, for certain of these mortgage loans, limited or no historical operating information is available with respect to the related mortgaged properties. As a result, you may find it difficult to analyze the historical performance of those mortgaged properties.

Ongoing Information

The primary source of ongoing information regarding the offered certificates, including information regarding the status of the related mortgage loans and any credit support for the offered certificates, will be the periodic reports delivered to you and the information we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Reports to Certificateholders; Available Information” in this prospectus supplement. We cannot assure you that any additional ongoing information regarding the offered certificates will be available through any other source. The limited nature of the available information in respect of the offered certificates may adversely affect their liquidity, even if a secondary market for the offered certificates does develop.

We are not aware of any source through which pricing information regarding the offered certificates will be generally available on an ongoing basis or on any particular date.

Legal and Regulatory Provisions Affecting Investors Could Adversely Affect the Liquidity of the Offered Certificates

We make no representations as to the proper characterization of the offered certificates for legal investment, financial institution regulatory, financial reporting or other purposes, as to the ability of particular investors to purchase the offered certificates under applicable legal investment or other restrictions or as to the consequences of an investment in the offered certificates for such purposes or under such restrictions. We note that regulatory or legislative provisions applicable to certain investors may have the effect of limiting or restricting their ability to hold or acquire CMBS, which in turn may adversely affect the ability of investors in the offered certificates who are not subject to those provisions to resell their certificates in the secondary market. For example:

· Effective January 1, 2014, EU Regulation 575/2013 (the “CRR”) imposes on European Economic Area (“EEA”) credit institutions and investment firms investing in securitizations issued on or after January 1, 2011, or in securitizations issued prior to that date where new assets are added or substituted after December 31, 2014: (a) a requirement (the “Retention Requirement”) that the originator, sponsor or original lender of such securitization has explicitly disclosed that it will retain, on an ongoing basis, a material net economic interest which, in any event, shall not be less than 5%; and (b) a requirement (the “Due Diligence Requirement”) that the investing credit institution or investment firm has undertaken certain due diligence in respect of the securitization and the underlying exposures and has established procedures for monitoring them on an ongoing basis.

S-69

National regulators in EEA member states are required to impose penal risk weights on securitization investments in respect of which the Retention Requirement or the Due Diligence Requirement has not been satisfied in any material respect by reason of the negligence or omission of the investing credit institution or investment firm. If the Retention Requirement or the Due Diligence Requirement is not satisfied in respect of a securitization investment held by a non-EEA subsidiary of an EEA credit institution or investment firm then an additional risk weight may be applied to such securitization investment when taken into account on a consolidated basis at the level of the EEA credit institution or investment firm. Requirements similar to the Retention Requirement and the Due Diligence Requirement (the “Similar Requirements”): (i) apply to investments in securitizations by investment funds managed by EEA investment managers subject to EU Directive 2011/61/EU; and (ii) subject to the adoption of certain secondary legislation, will apply to investments in securitizations by EEA insurance and reinsurance undertakings and by EEA undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities. None of the originators, the sponsors, the depositor or the issuing entity intends to retain a material net economic interest in the securitization constituted by the issue of the certificates in accordance with Retention Requirement or to take any other action which may be required by EEA-regulated investors for the purposes of their compliance with Retention Requirement, the Due Diligence Requirement or Similar Requirements. Consequently, credit institutions, investment firms or the other types of EEA regulated investors mentioned above are unlikely to be able to hold the certificates. As a result, the price and liquidity of the certificates in the secondary market may be adversely affected. This could adversely affect your ability to transfer certificates or the price you may receive upon your sale of certificates.

· The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) enacted in the United States requires that federal banking agencies amend their regulations to remove reference to or reliance on credit agency ratings, including, but not limited to, those found in the federal banking agencies’ risk-based capital regulations. New capital regulations, which were adopted by the banking regulators in July 2013 and began phasing in on January 1, 2014, implement the increased capital requirements established under the Basel Accord. These new capital regulations eliminate reliance on credit ratings and otherwise alter, and in most cases increase, the capital requirements imposed on depository institutions and their holding companies, including with respect to ownership of asset-backed securities such as CMBS. As a result of these regulations, investments in CMBS like the certificates by institutions subject to the risk based capital regulations may result in greater capital charges to these financial institutions, and the treatment of CMBS for their regulatory capital purposes may otherwise be adversely affected. Such developments could reduce the attractiveness of investments in CMBS for such entities.

· The issuing entity will be relying on an exclusion or exemption from the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act contained in Section 3(c)(5) of the Investment Company Act or Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act, although there may be additional exclusions or exemptions available to the issuing entity. The issuing entity is being structured so as not to constitute a “covered fund” for purposes of the regulations adopted to implement Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act (such statutory provision, together with such implementing regulations, the “Volcker Rule”). The Volcker Rule generally prohibits “banking entities” (which is broadly defined to include U.S. banks and bank holding companies and many non-U.S. banking entities, together with their respective subsidiaries and other affiliates) from (i) engaging in proprietary trading, (ii) acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in or sponsoring a “covered fund” and (iii) entering into certain relationships with such funds. Under the Volcker Rule, unless otherwise jointly determined by specified federal regulators, a “covered fund” does not include an issuer that may rely on an exclusion or exemption from the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act other than the exclusions contained in Section 3(c)(1) and Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. The Volcker Rule became effective on July 21, 2012, and final regulations implementing the Volcker Rule were adopted on December 10, 2013 and became effective on April 1, 2014, with conformance required by July 21, 2015 (or by July 21, 2016 in respect of investments in and relationships with covered funds that were in place prior to December 31, 2013, with the possibility of a further one-year extension). Although prior to the deadlines for conformance, banking entities were or are required to make good-faith efforts to conform their activities and investments to the Volcker Rule, the general effects of the Volcker Rule remain uncertain. Any prospective investor in the certificates, including a U.S. or foreign bank or a subsidiary or other

S-70

affiliate thereof, should consult its own legal advisors regarding such matters and other effects of the Volcker Rule.

· The Financial Accounting Standards Board has adopted changes to the accounting standards for structured products. These changes, or any future changes, may affect the accounting for entities such as the issuing entity, could under certain circumstances require an investor or its owner generally to consolidate the assets of the issuing entity in its financial statements and record third parties’ investments in the issuing entity as liabilities of that investor or owner or could otherwise adversely affect the manner in which the investor or its owner must report an investment in commercial mortgage-backed securities for financial reporting purposes.

· For purposes of the Secondary Mortgage Market Enhancement Act of 1984, as amended, no class of offered certificates will constitute “mortgage related securities”.

Accordingly, all investors whose investment activities are subject to legal investment laws and regulations, regulatory capital requirements, or review by regulatory authorities should consult with their own legal, accounting and other advisors in determining whether, and to what extent, the offered certificates will constitute legal investments for them or are subject to investment or other restrictions, unfavorable accounting treatment, capital charges or reserve requirements. See “Legal Investment” in this prospectus supplement and in the prospectus.

None of the issuing entity, the depositor, the underwriters, the mortgage loan sellers or any other party to the transaction makes any representation to any prospective investor or purchaser of the offered certificates regarding the regulatory capital treatment of their investment in the offered certificates on the closing date or at any time in the future.

Your Yield May Be Affected by Defaults, Prepayments and Other Factors

General

The yield to maturity on each class of the offered certificates will depend in part on the following:

· the purchase price for the certificates;

· the rate and timing of principal payments on the mortgage loans (both voluntary and involuntary), and the allocation of principal prepayments to the respective classes of offered certificates with principal balances; and

· the allocation of shortfalls and losses on the mortgage loans to the respective classes of offered certificates.

Any changes in the weighted average lives of your certificates may adversely affect your yield. In general, if you buy a certificate at a premium, and principal distributions occur faster than expected, your actual yield to maturity will be lower than expected. If principal distributions are very high, holders of certificates purchased at a premium might not fully recover their initial investment. Conversely, if you buy a certificate at a discount and principal distributions occur more slowly than expected, your actual yield to maturity will be lower than expected.

Prepayments resulting in a shortening of weighted average lives of your certificates may be made at a time of low interest rates when you may be unable to reinvest the resulting payment of principal on your certificates at a rate comparable to the effective yield anticipated by you in making your investment in the certificates, while delays and extensions resulting in a lengthening of those weighted average lives may occur at a time of high interest rates when you may have been able to reinvest principal payments that would otherwise have been received by you at higher rates.

S-71

In addition, the extent to which prepayments on the mortgage loans in the issuing entity ultimately affect the weighted average life of the certificates will depend on the terms of the certificates, more particularly:

· a class of certificates that entitles the holders of those certificates to a disproportionately larger share of the prepayments on the mortgage loans increases the “call risk” or the likelihood of early retirement of that class if the rate of prepayment is relatively fast; and

· a class of certificates that entitles the holders of the certificates to a disproportionately smaller share of the prepayments on the mortgage loans increases the likelihood of “extension risk” or an extended average life of that class if the rate of prepayment is relatively slow.

The Timing of Prepayments and Repurchases May Change Your Anticipated Yield

We are not aware of any relevant publicly available or authoritative statistics with respect to the historical prepayment experiences of commercial mortgage loans. For this purpose, principal payments include both voluntary prepayments, if permitted, and involuntary prepayments, such as prepayments resulting from the application of loan reserves, property releases, casualty or condemnation, defaults and liquidations or repurchases upon breaches of representations and warranties or material document defects or purchases by the holder of a subordinate companion loan or a mezzanine lender (if any) pursuant to a purchase option or sales of defaulted mortgage loans. The rate at which voluntary prepayments occur on the mortgage loans will be affected by a variety of factors, including:

· the terms of the mortgage loans, including, the length of any prepayment lockout period and the applicable yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums and the extent to which the related mortgage loan terms may be practically enforced;

· the level of prevailing interest rates;

· the availability of mortgage credit;

· the master servicer’s or special servicer’s ability to enforce yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums;

· the failure to meet certain requirements for the release of escrows;

· the occurrence of casualties or natural disasters; and

· economic, demographic, tax, legal or other factors.

See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Prepayment Protections and Certain Involuntary Prepayments” in this prospectus supplement for a description of certain prepayment protections and other factors that may influence the rate of prepayment of the mortgage loans. See “Risk Factors—Some Provisions in the Mortgage Loans Underlying Your Offered Certificates May Be Challenged as Being Unenforceable” in the prospectus.

In addition, if a sponsor (or, in the case of KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC, KGS Holdings, L.P., as guarantor of the repurchase and substitution obligations of KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC, or, in the case of RAIT Funding, LLC, RAIT Financial Trust, as guarantor of the repurchase and substitution obligations of RAIT Funding, LLC) repurchases any mortgage loan from the issuing entity due to breaches of representations or warranties or document defects, the repurchase price paid will be passed through to the holders of the certificates with the same effect as if the mortgage loan had been prepaid in part or in full, and no yield maintenance charge or other prepayment charge would be payable. Additionally, the holder of any subordinate companion loan (if any) or any mezzanine lender (if any) may have the option to purchase the related mortgage loan after certain defaults, and the purchase price may not include any yield maintenance payments or prepayment charges. As a result of such a repurchase or purchase, investors in the Class X-A and Class X-D certificates and any other certificates purchased at a premium might not fully recoup their initial investment. A repurchase, a prepayment or the exercise of a purchase option may adversely affect the yield to maturity on your

S-72

certificates. In this respect, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Representations and Warranties” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.

The Class X-A and Class X-D certificates will not be entitled to distributions of principal but instead will accrue interest on their respective notional amounts. Because the notional amount of the Class X-A certificates is based upon the outstanding certificate principal amounts of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates and the Class A-S trust component, the yield to maturity on the Class X-A certificates will be extremely sensitive to the rate and timing of prepayments of principal, liquidations and principal losses on the mortgage loans to the extent allocated to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates and the Class A-S trust component. Because the notional amount of the Class X-D certificates is based upon the outstanding certificate principal amount of the Class D certificates, the yield to maturity on the Class X-D certificates will be extremely sensitive to the rate and timing of prepayments of principal, liquidations and principal losses on the mortgage loans to the extent allocated to the Class D certificates.

A rapid rate of principal prepayments, liquidations and/or principal losses on the mortgage loans could result in the failure to recoup the initial investment in the Class X-A and/or Class X-D certificates. Investors in the Class X-A and Class X-D certificates should fully consider the associated risks, including the risk that an extremely rapid rate of amortization, prepayment or other liquidation of the mortgage loans could result in the failure of such investors to recoup fully their initial investments. The yield to maturity of the Class X-A and/or Class X-D certificates may be adversely affected by the prepayment of mortgage loans with higher net mortgage loan rates. See “Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations—Yield on the Class X-A and Class X-D Certificates” in this prospectus supplement.

Losses and Shortfalls May Change Your Anticipated Yield

If losses on the mortgage loans exceed the aggregate certificate principal amount of the classes of certificates subordinated to a particular class, that class will suffer a loss equal to the full amount of the excess (up to the outstanding certificate principal amount of that class). Even if losses on the mortgage loans are not borne by your certificates, those losses may affect the weighted average life and yield to maturity of your certificates.

For example, certain shortfalls in interest as a result of involuntary prepayments may reduce the funds available to make payments on your certificates. In addition, if the master servicer, the special servicer or the trustee is reimbursed out of general collections on the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity for any advance that it has determined is not recoverable out of collections on the related mortgage loan, then to the extent that this reimbursement is made from collections of principal on the mortgage loans in the issuing entity, that reimbursement will reduce the amount of principal available to be distributed on the certificates and will result in a reduction of the certificate principal amount (or notional amount) of a class of certificates. See “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions” in this prospectus supplement. Likewise, if the master servicer or the trustee is reimbursed out of principal collections on the mortgage loans for any workout delayed reimbursement amounts, that reimbursement will reduce the amount of principal available to be distributed on the certificates on that distribution date. This reimbursement would have the effect of reducing current payments of principal on the offered certificates with principal balances and extending the weighted average lives of those certificates. See “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions” in this prospectus supplement.

In addition, to the extent losses are realized on the mortgage loans, first the Class H certificates, then the Class G certificates, then the Class F certificates, then the Class E certificates, then the Class D certificates, then the Class C trust component (and correspondingly, the Class C certificates and the Class PEZ certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class C trust component), then the Class B trust component (and correspondingly, the Class B certificates and the Class PEZ certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class B trust component), then the Class A-S trust component (and correspondingly, the Class A-S certificates and the Class PEZ certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S trust component) and, then, pro rata, the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates, based on their respective certificate principal amounts, will bear such losses up to an amount equal to the respective outstanding certificate principal amount thereof. A reduction in the certificate principal amount of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 or Class A-AB certificates or the Class A-S trust component will result in a corresponding reduction in the notional amount of the Class X-A certificates. A reduction in the certificate principal amount of the Class D certificates will result in a corresponding reduction in the notional amount of the Class X-D certificates. No representation is made as to the anticipated rate or timing of prepayments (voluntary or involuntary) or rate, timing or amount of liquidations or losses on the

S-73

mortgage loans or as to the anticipated yield to maturity of any such offered certificate. See “Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations” in this prospectus supplement.

The exchangeable certificates will be subject to a realized loss or shortfall on the Class A-S, Class B or Class C trust component to the extent of their percentage interest in such trust component. See “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions” in this prospectus supplement.

Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations May Assign Different Ratings to the Certificates; Ratings of the Certificates Reflect Only the Views of the Applicable Rating Agencies as of the Dates Such Ratings Were Issued; Ratings May Affect ERISA Eligibility; Ratings May Be Downgraded

Ratings assigned to the offered certificates by the nationally recognized statistical rating organizations engaged by the depositor:

· are based on, among other things, the economic characteristics of the mortgaged properties and other relevant structural features of the transaction;

· do not represent any assessment of the yield to maturity that a certificateholder may experience;

· reflect only the views of the respective rating agencies as of the date such ratings were issued;

· may be reviewed, revised, suspended, downgraded, qualified or withdrawn entirely by the applicable rating agency as a result of changes in or unavailability of information;

· may have been determined based on criteria that included an analysis of historical mortgage loan data that may not reflect future experience;

· may reflect assumptions by such rating agencies regarding performance of the mortgage loans that are not accurate, as evidenced by the significant amount of downgrades, qualifications and withdrawals of ratings assigned to previously issued CMBS by the hired rating agencies and other nationally recognized statistical rating organizations during the recent credit crisis; and

· do not consider to what extent the offered certificates will be subject to prepayment or that the outstanding principal amount of any class of offered certificates will be prepaid.

In addition, the rating of any class of offered certificates below an investment grade rating by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization, whether upon initial issuance of such class of certificates or as a result of a ratings downgrade, could adversely affect the ability of an employee benefit plan or other investor to purchase or retain those offered certificates. See “ERISA Considerations” and “Legal Investment” in this prospectus supplement.

Nationally recognized statistical rating organizations that were not engaged by the depositor to rate the offered certificates may nevertheless issue unsolicited credit ratings on one or more classes of offered certificates, relying on information they receive pursuant to Rule 17g-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise. If any such unsolicited ratings are issued, we cannot assure you that they will not be different from any ratings assigned by a rating agency engaged by the depositor. The issuance of unsolicited ratings by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization on a class of the offered certificates that are lower than ratings assigned by a rating agency engaged by the depositor may adversely impact the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of that class.

As part of the process of obtaining ratings for the offered certificates, the depositor had initial discussions with and submitted certain materials to five nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. Based on preliminary feedback from those nationally recognized statistical rating organizations at that time, the depositor selected three of those nationally recognized statistical rating organizations to rate the offered certificates (or, in the case of any particular nationally recognized statistical rating organization so selected, certain classes of the offered certificates) but not the others, due in part to their initial subordination levels for the various classes of the offered and non-offered certificates. Had the depositor selected alternative nationally recognized statistical rating organizations to rate the offered certificates, we cannot assure you as to the ratings that such other nationally

S-74

recognized statistical rating organizations would have ultimately assigned to the offered certificates. In the case of one of the three nationally recognized statistical rating organizations selected by the depositor, the depositor has requested ratings for only certain classes of the offered certificates, due in part to the initial subordination levels provided by such nationally recognized statistical rating organization for the various classes of the offered certificates. If the depositor had selected such nationally recognized statistical rating organization to rate the remaining classes of offered certificates not rated by it, its ratings of such certificates may have been different, and potentially lower, than those ratings ultimately assigned to such certificates by the other nationally recognized statistical rating organizations engaged to rate such certificates. Although unsolicited ratings may be issued by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization, a nationally recognized statistical rating organization might be more likely to issue an unsolicited rating if it was not selected after having provided preliminary feedback to the depositor.

Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Commission may determine that any or all of the rating agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the offered certificates no longer qualify as a nationally recognized statistical rating organization, or are no longer qualified to rate the offered certificates, and that determination may also have an adverse effect on the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of the offered certificates.

We are not obligated to maintain any particular rating with respect to the offered certificates, and the ratings initially assigned to the offered certificates by any or all of the rating agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the offered certificates could change adversely as a result of changes affecting, among other things, the underlying mortgage loans, the mortgaged properties, the sponsors, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the operating advisor, the master servicer or the special servicer, or as a result of changes to ratings criteria employed by any or all of the rating agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the offered certificates. Although these changes would not necessarily be or result from an event of default on any underlying mortgage loan, any adverse change to the ratings of the offered certificates would likely have an adverse effect on the market value, liquidity and/or regulatory characteristics of those certificates.

To the extent that the provisions of the pooling and servicing agreement or any mortgage loan serviced thereunder condition any action, event or circumstance on the delivery of a rating agency confirmation, the pooling and servicing agreement will require delivery or deemed delivery of a rating agency confirmation only from the rating agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the offered certificates (and, in the case of certain actions, events or consequences related to any serviced pari passu companion loan that is included in a securitization transaction, the related companion loan rating agencies).

Further, certain actions provided for in loan agreements may require a rating agency confirmation be obtained from the rating agencies engaged by the depositor to rate the offered certificates as a precondition to taking such action. In certain circumstances, this condition may be deemed to have been met or waived without such a rating agency confirmation being obtained. In the event such an action is taken without a rating agency confirmation being obtained, we cannot assure you that the applicable rating agency will not downgrade, qualify or withdraw its ratings as a result of the taking of such action. Rating agency confirmations with respect to any outside serviced mortgage loan will also be subject to the terms and provisions of the related outside servicing agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—‘Due-On-Sale’ and ‘Due-On-Encumbrance’ Provisions,” “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Rating Agency Confirmations” and “Ratings” in this prospectus supplement for additional considerations regarding the ratings, including a description of the process of obtaining confirmations of ratings for the offered certificates.

Commercial and Multifamily Lending Is Dependent on Net Operating Income

The mortgage loans are secured by various income-producing commercial and multifamily properties. The repayment of a commercial or multifamily mortgage loan is typically dependent upon the ability of the related mortgaged property to produce cash flow through the collection of rents. Even the liquidation value of a commercial or multifamily property is determined, in substantial part, by the capitalization of the property’s ability to produce cash flow. However, net operating income can be volatile and may be insufficient to cover debt service on the commercial or multifamily mortgage loan at any given time.

For certain historical financial information relating to the mortgaged properties, including net operating income for the most recent reporting period and prior three calendar years, to the extent available, prospective investors should review Annex A to this prospectus supplement. Certain mortgage loans are secured in whole or in part by mortgaged properties that have no prior operating history available or otherwise lack historical financial figures

S-75

and information. A mortgaged property may lack prior operating history or historical financial information for various reasons including because it is newly constructed or renovated, it is a recent acquisition by the related borrower or it is a single-tenant property that is subject to a triple net lease. In addition, a tenant’s lease may contain confidentiality provisions that restrict the sponsors’ access to or disclosure of such tenant’s financial information. Although the underwritten net cash flows and underwritten net operating income for mortgaged properties are derived principally from current rent rolls or tenant leases, underwritten net cash flows may also, in some cases, be based on (i) leases (or letters of intent) that are not yet in place (and may still be under negotiation), (ii) tenants that may have signed a lease (or letter of intent) or a lease amendment expanding the leased space, but are not yet in occupancy and/or are not yet paying rent, (iii) tenants that are leasing on a month-to-month basis and have the right to terminate their leases on a monthly basis, and/or (iv) historical expenses, adjusted to account for inflation, significant occupancy increases and a market rate management fee. However, we cannot assure you that such tenants will execute leases (or letters of intent) or expand their space or, in any event, that actual cash flows from such mortgaged properties will meet such projected cash flows, income and expense levels or that those funds will be sufficient to meet the payment obligations of the related mortgage loans.

See “—Underwritten Net Cash Flow Could Be Based on Incorrect or Failed Assumptions” below and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Additional Mortgage Loan Information” in this prospectus supplement. See “Risk Factors—Repayment of a Commercial or Multifamily Mortgage Loan Depends Upon the Performance and Value of the Underlying Real Property, Which May Decline Over Time, and the Related Borrower’s Ability to Refinance the Property, of Which There Is No Assurance” in the prospectus for a discussion of factors that could adversely affect the net operating income and property value of commercial properties.

Design Center and Showroom Building Properties Have Special Risks

The value of design center and showroom building properties is significantly affected by national economic conditions and advances in technology, as well as by fundamental aspects of real estate, such as location, trade area and market demographics.

Design center and showroom building properties present risks not associated with other properties. Design center and showroom properties may feature a less diversified tenant mix than comparable office properties, and as such may be more sensitive to market changes. Significant factors determining the value of design center and showroom properties include:

· competing design center and showroom building properties for a specialized market of tenants and consumers;

· the extent of manufacturer commitment to the design center and showroom building, which may be affected by competing buildings or alternate distribution methods;

· demand for showrooms, which may be affected by alternative merchandising outlets or sources, including the internet; and

· national economic changes that may particularly affect demand for showrooms typically associated with discretionary goods such as furniture, fabrics, antiques, art, flooring, wall coverings, lighting, and other decorative items.

Additionally, design center and showroom buildings may not be readily adaptable to an alternative uses. As indicated on Annex B to this prospectus supplement, the mortgage loan secured by the mortgaged property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as The Decoration & Design Building, representing approximately 6.8% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, is currently operated as a wholesale design center, including approximately 130 showrooms.

S-76

Underwritten Net Cash Flow Could Be Based on Incorrect or Failed Assumptions

As described in “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in this prospectus supplement and Annex A to this prospectus supplement, underwritten net cash flow means cash flow (including any cash flow from master leases) as adjusted based on a number of assumptions used by the related sponsor. No representation is made that the underwritten net cash flow set forth in this prospectus supplement as of the cut-off date or any other date represents actual future net cash flows. For example, with respect to certain mortgage loans included in the issuing entity, the occupancy of the related mortgaged property reflects tenants that may not have yet actually executed leases (or letters of intent) or that have signed leases but have not yet taken occupancy and/or are not paying full contractual rent or tenants that are seeking or may in the future seek to sublet all or a portion of their respective spaces, or tenants that are “dark” tenants but paying rent, or space that has been master leased to an affiliate of a borrower. You should review these assumptions and make your own determination of the appropriate assumptions to be used in determining underwritten net cash flow. In many cases, co-tenancy provisions were assumed to be satisfied and vacant space was assumed to be occupied and space that was due to expire was assumed to have been re-let, in each case at market rates that may have exceeded current rent.

In the event of the inaccuracy of any assumptions or projections used in connection with the calculation of underwritten net cash flow, the actual net cash flow could be significantly different (and, in some cases, may be materially less) than the underwritten net cash flow presented in this prospectus supplement, and this would change other numerical information presented in this prospectus supplement based on or derived from the underwritten net cash flow, such as the debt service coverage ratios presented in this prospectus supplement.

In addition, the debt service coverage ratios set forth in this prospectus supplement for the mortgage loans and the mortgaged properties vary, and may vary substantially, from the debt service coverage ratios for the mortgage loans and the mortgaged properties as calculated pursuant to the definition of such ratios as set forth in the related mortgage loan documents. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in this prospectus supplement for additional information on certain of the mortgage loans in the issuing entity.

The Mortgage Loans Have Not Been Reunderwritten by Us; Some Mortgage Loans May Not Have Complied with Another Originator’s Underwriting Criteria

We have not reunderwritten the mortgage loans or the related loan combinations. Instead, we have relied on the representations and warranties made by the related sponsor, and the remedies for breach of a representation and warranty as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Representations and Warranties” and “—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions” in this prospectus supplement.

If we had reunderwritten the mortgage loans or the related loan combinations, it is possible that the reunderwriting process may have revealed problems with a mortgage loan not covered by a representation or warranty or may have revealed inaccuracies in the representations and warranties. See “—Sponsors May Not Be Able to Make Required Repurchases or Substitutions of Defective Mortgage Loans” below, “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Representations and Warranties” and “—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions” in this prospectus supplement.

In addition, we cannot assure you that all of the mortgage loans would have complied with the underwriting criteria of the other originators or, accordingly, that each originator would have made the same decision to originate every mortgage loan included in the issuing entity or, if they did decide to originate an unrelated mortgage loan, that they would have been underwritten on the same terms and conditions.

As a result of the foregoing, you are advised and encouraged to make your own investment decision based on a careful review of the information set forth in this prospectus supplement and your own view of the mortgage pool.

Static Pool Data Would Not Be Indicative of the Performance of This Pool

As a result of the distinct nature of each pool of commercial mortgage loans, and the separate mortgage loans within the pool, this prospectus supplement does not include disclosure concerning the delinquency and loss experience of static pools of periodic originations by any sponsor of assets of the type to be securitized

S-77

(known as “static pool data”). In particular, static pool data showing a low level of delinquencies and defaults would not be indicative of the performance of this pool or any other pools of mortgage loans originated by the same sponsor or sponsors. While there may be certain common factors affecting the performance and value of income-producing real properties in general, those factors do not apply equally to all income-producing real properties and, in many cases, there are unique factors that will affect the performance and/or value of a particular income-producing real property. Therefore, you should evaluate this offering on the basis of the information set forth in this prospectus supplement with respect to the mortgage loans, and not on the basis of any successful performance of other pools of securitized commercial mortgage loans.

Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property

Appraisals were obtained with respect to each of the mortgaged properties at or about the time of origination of the applicable mortgage loan (or loan combination, if applicable) or at or around the time of the acquisition of the mortgage loan (or loan combination, if applicable) by the related sponsor. See Annex A to this prospectus supplement for dates of the latest appraisals for the mortgaged properties.

In general, appraisals represent the analysis and opinion of qualified appraisers and are not guarantees of present or future value. One appraiser may reach a different conclusion than that of a different appraiser with respect to the same property. The appraisals seek to establish the amount a typically motivated buyer would pay a typically motivated seller and, in certain cases, may have taken into consideration the purchase price paid by the borrower. The amount could be significantly higher than the amount obtained from the sale of a mortgaged property in a distress or liquidation sale. Information regarding the appraised values of the mortgaged properties (including loan-to-value ratios) presented in this prospectus supplement is not intended to be a representation as to the past, present or future market values of the mortgaged properties. For example, in some cases, a borrower or its affiliate may have acquired the related mortgaged property for a price or otherwise for consideration in an amount that is less than the related appraised value specified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement, including at a foreclosure sale or through acceptance of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. Historical operating results of the mortgaged properties used in these appraisals, as adjusted by various assumptions, estimates and subjective judgments on the part of the appraiser, may not be comparable to future operating results. In addition, other factors may impair the mortgaged properties’ value without affecting their current net operating income, including:

· changes in governmental regulations, zoning or tax laws;

· potential environmental or other legal liabilities;

· the availability of refinancing; and

· changes in interest rate levels.

In certain cases, appraisals may reflect “as-is”, “as stabilized” or other values. However, the appraised value reflected in this prospectus supplement with respect to each mortgaged property, except as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions”, reflects only the “as-is” appraised value (or, in certain cases, may reflect the “as stabilized” or other value as a result of the satisfaction of the related conditions or assumptions unless otherwise specified), which may contain certain assumptions, such as future construction completion, projected re-tenanting or increased tenant occupancies. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Appraised Value” in this prospectus supplement.

We cannot assure you that the information set forth in this prospectus supplement regarding appraised values or loan-to-value ratios accurately reflects past, present or future market values of the mortgaged properties. Additionally, with respect to the appraisals setting forth assumptions, particularly those setting forth extraordinary assumptions, as to the “as-is”, “as stabilized” or other values, we cannot assure you that those assumptions are or will be accurate or that the “as-is”, “as stabilized” or other values will be the value of the related mortgaged property at the indicated stabilization date or at maturity. Any engineering report, site inspection or appraisal represents only the analysis of the individual consultant, engineer or inspector preparing such report at the time of such report, and may not reveal all necessary or desirable repairs, maintenance and capital improvement items. See “Transaction Parties—The Originators—Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.—Third Party Reports”, “—The Originators—The Goldman Originators—Origination and Underwriting Process”, “—The Originators—Rialto

S-78

Mortgage Finance, LLC—Assessments of Property Condition”, “—The Originators—KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC—Assessments of Property Condition” and “—The Originators—RAIT Funding, LLC—Loan Analysis” in this prospectus supplement for additional information regarding the appraisals.

Performance of the Certificates Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases

General

Any tenant may, from time to time, experience a downturn in its business, which may weaken its financial condition and result in a reduction or failure to make rental payments when due. If tenants’ sales were to decline, percentage rents may decline and, further, tenants may be unable to pay their base rent or other occupancy costs. If a tenant defaults in its obligations to a property owner, that property owner may experience delays in enforcing its rights as lessor and may incur substantial costs and experience significant delays associated with protecting its investment, including costs incurred in renovating and reletting the property.

Additionally, the income from, and market value of, the mortgaged properties leased to various tenants would be adversely affected if:

· space in the mortgaged properties could not be leased or re-leased or substantial re-leasing costs were required and/or the cost of performing landlord obligations under existing leases materially increased;

· leasing or re-leasing is restricted by exclusive rights of tenants to lease the mortgaged properties or other covenants not to lease space for certain uses or activities, or covenants limiting the types of tenants to which space may be leased;

· a significant tenant were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case;

· rental payments could not be collected for any other reason; or

· a borrower fails to perform its obligations under a lease resulting in the related tenant having a right to terminate such lease.

In addition, certain of the mortgage loans may have tenants who are leasing their spaces on a month-to-month basis and have the right to terminate their leases on a monthly basis.

A Tenant Concentration May Result in Increased Losses

A deterioration in the financial condition of a tenant, the failure of a tenant to renew its lease or the exercise by a tenant of an early termination right can be particularly significant if a mortgaged property is owner-occupied, leased to a single tenant, or if any tenant makes up a significant portion of the rental income at the mortgaged property.

Concentrations of particular tenants among the mortgaged properties or within a particular business or industry at one or multiple mortgaged properties increase the possibility that financial problems with such tenants or such business or industry sectors could affect the mortgage loans. In these cases, business issues for a particular tenant could have a disproportionately large impact on the pool of mortgage loans and adversely affect distributions to certificateholders. Similarly, an issue with respect to a particular industry could also have a disproportionately large impact on the pool of mortgage loans. In addition, the mortgage loans may be adversely affected if a tenant at the mortgaged property is highly specialized, or dependent on a single industry or only a few customers for its revenue. See “—Tenant Bankruptcy Could Result in a Rejection of the Related Lease” below, and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Tenant Concentrations” in this prospectus supplement for information on tenant concentrations in the mortgage pool.

S-79

Mortgaged Properties Leased to Multiple Tenants Also Have Risks

If a mortgaged property has multiple tenants, re-leasing expenditures may be more frequent than in the case of mortgaged properties with fewer tenants, thereby reducing the cash flow available for payments on the related mortgage loan. Multi-tenant mortgaged properties also may experience higher continuing vacancy rates and greater volatility in rental income and expenses. See Annex A to this prospectus supplement for tenant lease expiration dates for the 5 largest tenants at each mortgaged property.

Mortgaged Properties Leased to Borrowers or Borrower Affiliated Entities Also Have Risks

If a mortgaged property is leased in whole or substantial part to the borrower under the mortgage loan or to an affiliate of the borrower, there may be conflicts. For instance, it is more likely a landlord will waive lease conditions for an affiliated tenant than it would for an unaffiliated tenant. We cannot assure you that the conflicts arising where a borrower is affiliated with a tenant at a mortgaged property will not adversely impact the value of the related mortgage loan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Affiliated Leases” in this prospectus supplement for information on properties leased in whole or in part to borrowers and their affiliates.

Tenant Bankruptcy Could Result in a Rejection of the Related Lease

The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant or a number of smaller tenants, such as in retail properties, may have an adverse impact on the mortgaged properties affected and the income produced by such mortgaged properties. Under the Bankruptcy Code, a tenant has the option of assuming or rejecting or, subject to certain conditions, assuming and assigning to a third party, any unexpired lease. If the tenant rejects the lease, the landlord’s claim for breach of the lease would (absent collateral securing the claim) be treated as a general unsecured claim against the tenant and a lessor’s damages for lease rejection are generally subject to certain limitations. We cannot assure you that tenants of the mortgaged properties will continue making payments under their leases or that tenants will not file for bankruptcy protection in the future or, if any tenants so file, that they will continue to make rental payments in a timely manner. See “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Issues” in the prospectus. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings” in this prospectus supplement for information regarding bankruptcy issues with respect to certain mortgage loans.

Leases That Are Not Subordinated to the Lien of the Mortgage or Do Not Contain Attornment Provisions May Have an Adverse Impact at Foreclosure

In certain jurisdictions, if tenant leases are subordinated to the liens created by the mortgage but do not contain attornment provisions that require the tenant to subordinate the lease if the mortgagee agrees to enter into a non-disturbance agreement, the tenants may terminate their leases upon the transfer of the property to a foreclosing lender or purchaser at foreclosure. Accordingly, if a mortgaged property is located in such a jurisdiction and is leased to one or more desirable tenants under leases that are subordinate to the mortgage and do not contain attornment provisions, such mortgaged property could experience a further decline in value if such tenants’ leases were terminated. This is particularly likely if such tenants were paying above-market rents or could not be replaced. If a lease is not subordinate to a mortgage, the issuing entity will not possess the right to dispossess the tenant upon foreclosure of the mortgaged property (unless otherwise agreed to with the tenant). Also, if the lease contains provisions inconsistent with the mortgage (e.g., provisions relating to application of insurance proceeds or condemnation awards) or which could affect the enforcement of the lender’s rights (e.g., a right of first refusal to purchase the property), the provisions of the lease will take precedence over the provisions of the mortgage. Not all leases were reviewed to ascertain the existence of attornment or subordination provisions.

With respect to certain of the mortgage loans, the related borrower has given to certain tenants or others an option to purchase, a right of first refusal and/or a right of first offer to purchase all or a portion of the mortgaged property in the event a sale is contemplated, and such right is not subordinate to the related mortgage. This may impede the mortgagee’s ability to sell the related mortgaged property at foreclosure, or, upon foreclosure, this may affect the value and/or marketability of the related mortgaged property. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Purchase Options, Rights of First Offer and Rights of First Refusal” in this prospectus supplement for information regarding material purchase options, rights of first offer and/or rights of first refusal, if any, with respect to mortgaged properties securing certain mortgage loans.

S-80

Early Lease Termination Options May Reduce Cash Flow

Any exercise of a termination right by a tenant at a mortgaged property could result in vacant space at the related mortgaged property, renegotiation of the lease with the related tenant or re-letting of the space on a date earlier than the lease expiration date shown on Annex A to this prospectus supplement or in rent rolls. Any such vacated space may not be re-let. Furthermore, similar termination and/or abatement rights may arise in the future or materially adversely affect the related borrower’s ability to meet its obligations under the related mortgage loan documents. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Lease Expirations and Terminations” in this prospectus supplement for information on material tenant lease expirations and early termination options.

Mortgaged Properties Leased to Not-for-Profit Tenants Also Have Risks

Certain mortgaged properties, which may include office, retail and multifamily properties, among others, may have tenants that are charitable institutions that generally rely on contributions from individuals and government grants or other subsidies to pay rent on such properties and other operating expenses. We cannot assure you that the rate, frequency and level of individual contributions or governmental grants and subsidies will continue with respect to any such institution. A reduction in contributions or grants may impact the ability of the related institution to pay rent, and there can be no assurance that the related borrower will be in a position to meet its obligations under the related mortgage loan documents if such tenant fails to pay its rent.

Concentrations Based on Property Type, Geography, Related Borrowers and Other Factors May Disproportionately Increase Losses

The effect of mortgage pool loan losses will be more severe if the losses relate to mortgage loans that account for a disproportionately large percentage of the pool’s aggregate principal balance. As mortgage loans pay down or properties are released, the remaining mortgage loans may face a higher risk with respect to the diversity of property types and property characteristics and with respect to the number of borrowers.

See the tables entitled “Distribution of Remaining Terms to Maturity” in Annex C to this prospectus supplement for a stratification of the remaining terms to maturity of the mortgage loans. Because principal on the offered certificates and the trust components is payable in sequential order of payment priority, and a class or trust component receives principal only after the preceding class(es) or trust component(s), as applicable, have been paid in full, classes or trust components that have a lower sequential priority are more likely to face these types of risk of concentration than classes or trust components with a higher sequential priority.

A concentration of mortgage loans secured by the same mortgaged property types can increase the risk that a decline in a particular industry or business would have a disproportionately large impact on the pool of mortgage loans. Mortgaged property types representing more than 5.0% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date (based on allocated loan amount) are office, hospitality, retail, multifamily and self storage. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans—Property Types” in this prospectus supplement for information on the types of mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans in the mortgage pool. For a description of the risks relating to the specific property types, see “Risk Factors—The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered Certificates May Present Special Risks” in the prospectus.

Repayments by borrowers and the market value of the related mortgaged properties could be affected by economic conditions generally or specific to particular geographic areas or regions of the United States, and concentrations of mortgaged properties in particular geographic areas may increase the risk that conditions in the real estate market where the mortgaged property is located, or other adverse economic or other developments or natural disasters (e.g., earthquakes, floods, forest fires, tornadoes or hurricanes or changes in governmental rules or fiscal policies) affecting a particular region of the country, could increase the frequency and severity of losses on mortgage loans secured by those mortgaged properties. Mortgaged properties securing more than 5.0% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date (based on allocated loan amount) are located in Illinois, California, New York, Texas, North Carolina, Florida and Michigan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans—Geographic Concentrations” in this prospectus supplement.

S-81

Some of the mortgaged properties are located in areas that, based on low population density, poor economic demographics (such as higher than average unemployment rates, lower than average annual household income and/or overall loss of jobs) and/or negative trends in such regards, would be considered secondary or tertiary markets.

A concentration of mortgage loans with the same borrower or related borrowers also can pose increased risks:

· if a borrower that owns or controls several mortgaged properties (whether or not all of them secure mortgage loans in the mortgage pool) experiences financial difficulty at 1 mortgaged property, it could defer maintenance at another mortgaged property in order to satisfy current expenses with respect to the first mortgaged property;

· a borrower could also attempt to avert foreclosure by filing a bankruptcy petition that might have the effect of interrupting debt service payments on the mortgage loans in the mortgage pool secured by that borrower’s mortgaged properties (subject to the master servicer’s and the trustee’s obligation to make advances for monthly payments) for an indefinite period; and

· mortgaged properties owned by the same borrower or related borrowers are likely to have common management, common general partners and/or common managing members increasing the risk that financial or other difficulties experienced by such related parties could have a greater impact on the pool of mortgage loans. See “—A Bankruptcy Proceeding May Result in Losses and Delays in Realizing on the Mortgage Loans” below.

See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement for information on the composition of the mortgage pool by property type and geographic distribution and loan concentration.

Risks Relating to Enforceability of Cross-Collateralization

Cross-collateralization arrangements may be terminated in certain circumstances under the terms of the related mortgage loan documents. Cross-collateralization arrangements whereby multiple borrowers grant their respective mortgaged properties as security for one or more mortgage loans could be challenged as fraudulent conveyances by the creditors or the bankruptcy estate of any of the related borrowers.

Among other things, a legal challenge to the granting of the liens may focus on the benefits realized by that borrower from the respective mortgage loan proceeds, as well as the overall cross-collateralization. If a court were to conclude that the granting of the liens was an avoidable fraudulent conveyance, that court could subordinate all or part of the mortgage loan to other debt of that borrower, recover prior payments made on that mortgage loan, or take other actions such as invalidating the mortgage loan or the mortgages securing the cross-collateralization. See “Risk Factors—Some Provisions in the Mortgage Loans Underlying Your Offered Certificates May Be Challenged as Being Unenforceable—Cross-Collateralization Arrangements” in the prospectus.

In addition, when multiple real properties secure a mortgage loan, the amount of the mortgage encumbering any particular one of those properties may be less than the full amount of the related aggregate mortgage loan indebtedness, to minimize recording tax. This mortgage amount is generally established at 100% to 150% of the appraised value or allocated loan amount for the mortgaged property and will limit the extent to which proceeds from the property will be available to offset declines in value of the other properties securing the same mortgage loan.

See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement for a description of mortgage loans that are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with each other, if any, or that are secured by multiple properties owned by multiple borrowers.

S-82

The Performance of a Mortgage Loan and Its Related Mortgaged Property Depends in Part on Who Controls the Borrower and Mortgaged Property

The operation and performance of a mortgage loan (or loan combination) will depend in part on the identity of the persons or entities who control the related borrower and the related mortgaged property. The performance of a mortgage loan (or loan combination) may be adversely affected if control of a borrower changes, which may occur, for example, by means of transfers of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower, or if the mortgage loan (or loan combination) is assigned to and assumed by another person or entity along with a transfer of the property to that person or entity.

Many of the mortgage loans generally place certain restrictions on the transfer and/or pledging of general partnership and managing member equity interests in a borrower such as specific percentage or control limitations, although there is already existing mezzanine debt, and mezzanine debt is permitted in the future, in the case of certain mortgage loans. We cannot assure you the ownership of any of the borrowers would not change during the term of the related mortgage loan and result in a material adverse effect on your certificates. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans—Additional Indebtedness” and “—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—‘Due-On-Sale’ and ‘Due-On-Encumbrance’ Provisions” in this prospectus supplement.

The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks

The borrowers are legal entities rather than individuals. Mortgage loans made to legal entities may entail greater risks of loss than those associated with mortgage loans made to individuals. For example, a legal entity, as opposed to an individual, may be more inclined to seek legal protection from its creditors under the bankruptcy laws. Unlike individuals involved in bankruptcies, most entities generally, but not in all cases, do not have personal assets and creditworthiness at stake. The terms of certain of the mortgage loans require that the borrowers be single-purpose entities, however, we cannot assure you that such borrowers will comply with such requirements. Furthermore, in many cases such borrowers are not required to observe all covenants and conditions which typically are required in order for such borrowers to be viewed under standard rating agency criteria as “special purpose entities.”

Although a borrower may currently be a single-purpose entity, in certain cases the borrowers were not originally formed as single-purpose entities, but at origination of the related mortgage loan (or loan combination, as applicable) their organizational documents were amended. That borrower may have previously owned property other than the related mortgaged property and may not have observed all covenants that typically are required to consider a borrower a “single-purpose entity” and thus may have liabilities arising from events prior to becoming a single-purpose entity. If a borrower has owned property other than the related mortgaged property, engaged in a business other than the operation of the related mortgaged property or even owned and/or operated the related mortgaged property for a material period in advance of the origination of the related mortgage loan, that borrower may be subject to liabilities arising out of its activities prior to the origination of the related mortgage loan, including liabilities that may be unrelated to the related mortgaged property. Furthermore, the bankruptcy of a borrower, or a general partner or managing member of a borrower, may impair the ability of the lender to enforce its rights and remedies under the related mortgage.

However, any borrower, even an entity structured as a special purpose entity, as an owner of real estate, will be subject to certain potential liabilities and risks as an owner of real estate. We cannot assure you that any borrower will not file for bankruptcy protection or that creditors of a borrower or a corporate or individual general partner or managing member of a borrower will not initiate a bankruptcy or similar proceeding against such borrower or corporate or individual general partner or managing member.

Furthermore, with respect to any affiliated borrowers, creditors of a common parent in bankruptcy may seek to consolidate the assets of such borrowers with those of the parent. Consolidation of the assets of such borrowers would likely have an adverse effect on the funds available to make distributions on your certificates, and may lead to a downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of the ratings of your certificates.

In addition, borrowers may own a mortgaged property as tenants-in-common. For example, in the case of the mortgage loans secured by the mortgaged properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Somerset Park Apartments, Courtyard at Cedar Hills, Peckham Square, CVS Paris, and CVS Plano, representing

S-83

approximately 6.9% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans, by allocated loan amount, as of the cut-off date, the related borrowers are tenants-in-common.

In certain instances, borrowers under mortgage loans use a Delaware statutory trust structure in order to gain certain tax free exchange treatment for property of like kind under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. These borrowers can be restricted in their ability to actively operate a property, including with respect to loan work-outs, leasing and re-leasing, making material improvements and other material actions affecting the related mortgaged property. In the case of a mortgaged property that is owned by a Delaware statutory trust or by tenants-in-common, there is a risk that obtaining the consent of the holders of the beneficial interests in the Delaware statutory trust or the consent of the tenants-in-common will be time consuming and cause delays with respect to the taking of certain actions by or on behalf of the borrower, including with respect to the related mortgaged property. In a tenant-in-common ownership structure, each tenant-in-common owns an undivided share in the property. Absent other arrangements, a tenancy-in-common entails the risk that a bankruptcy, dissolution or action for partition by one or more of the tenants-in-common will result in significant delay in recovery against the tenant-in-common borrowers, particularly if the tenant-in-common borrowers file for bankruptcy separately or in series (because each time a tenant-in-common borrower files for bankruptcy, the bankruptcy court stay will be reinstated), a material impairment in property management, a substantial decrease in the amount recoverable upon the related mortgage asset and/or early repayment of the related mortgage asset. Although the conditions to a conversion to a tenancy-in-common include arrangements intended to lessen these risks, such as waivers of the right to partition, we cannot assure you that such arrangements are in all cases implemented or, if challenged, would be enforced. See “Risk Factors—The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks and/or Hinder Recovery” in the prospectus.

See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Single-Purpose Entity Covenants” and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans—Tenancies-in-Common” in this prospectus supplement, and “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Issues” in the prospectus.

A Bankruptcy Proceeding May Result in Losses and Delays in Realizing on the Mortgage Loans

Numerous statutory provisions, including the Bankruptcy Code and state laws affording relief to debtors, may interfere with and delay the ability of a secured mortgage lender to obtain payment of a loan, to realize upon collateral and/or to enforce a deficiency judgment. For example, under the Bankruptcy Code, virtually all actions (including foreclosure actions and deficiency judgment proceedings) are automatically stayed upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition, and, often, no interest or principal payments are made during the course of the bankruptcy proceeding. Also, under federal bankruptcy law, the filing of a petition in bankruptcy by or on behalf of a junior lien holder may stay the senior lender from taking action to foreclose out such junior lien. Certain of the mortgage loans have sponsors that have previously filed bankruptcy and we cannot assure you that such sponsors will not be more likely than other sponsors to utilize their rights in bankruptcy in the event of any threatened action by the mortgagee to enforce its rights under the related mortgage loan documents. As a result, the issuing entity’s recovery with respect to borrowers in bankruptcy proceedings may be significantly delayed, and the aggregate amount ultimately collected may be substantially less than the amount owed. See “—Other Financings or Ability to Incur Other Financings Entails Risk” below, “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings” in this prospectus supplement and “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Issues” in the prospectus.

Additionally, the courts of any state may refuse the foreclosure of a mortgage or deed of trust when an acceleration of the indebtedness would be inequitable or unjust or the circumstances would render the action unconscionable. See “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Foreclosure” in the prospectus.

Additionally, in February 2012, a bill was passed by the Georgia Senate and introduced in the Georgia State House of Representatives that would limit rights of holders that acquired loans for less than par, by limiting the amount that a purchaser of debt (including the issuing entity) could collect from a guarantor of a commercial mortgage loan to the lesser of the purchase price paid for the debt or the maximum amount of the guarantee. The bill would apply both retroactively and prospectively to all types of loans made to all types of borrowers and presumably to the mortgage loans. If enacted, legislation of this type would appear to interfere with established contractual rights, and as such may be unconstitutional insofar as it would be applied to debt sold or transferred prior to the legislation’s enactment date. This type of measure could undermine the value of the mortgage loans and the special servicer’s workout efforts including, without limitation, the ability to collect on a guaranty or to use

S-84

the threat of the same as a mechanism to compel a borrower to engage in a workout or provide a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure. The legislative session of the Georgia State House of Representatives ended without a vote on the bill. As a result, the bill died; however, we cannot assure you that a similar bill will not be re-introduced and passed in Georgia or in any other state in future legislative sessions.

See also “—Performance of the Certificates Will Be Highly Dependent on the Performance of Tenants and Tenant Leases—Tenant Bankruptcy Could Result in a Rejection of the Related Lease” above.

Mortgage Loans Are Non-Recourse and Are Not Insured or Guaranteed

The mortgage loans are not insured or guaranteed by any person or entity, governmental or otherwise.

Investors should treat each mortgage loan as a non-recourse loan. If a default occurs, recourse generally may be had only against the specific properties and other assets that have been pledged to secure the loan. Consequently, payment prior to maturity is dependent primarily on the sufficiency of the net operating income of the mortgaged property. Payment at maturity is primarily dependent upon the market value of the mortgaged property and the borrower’s ability to sell or refinance the mortgaged property.

Although the mortgage loans generally are non-recourse in nature, certain mortgage loans contain non-recourse carveouts for liabilities such as a result of fraud by the borrower, certain voluntary insolvency proceedings or other matters. Certain mortgage loans set forth under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Non-Recourse Carveout Limitations” in this prospectus supplement either do not contain non-recourse carveouts or contain material limitations to non-recourse carveouts. Often these obligations are guaranteed by an affiliate of the related borrower, although liability under any such guaranty may be capped or otherwise limited in amount or scope. Furthermore, the guarantor’s net worth and liquidity may be less (and in some cases, materially less) than amounts due under the related mortgage loan or the guarantor’s sole asset may be its interest in the related borrower. Certain mortgage loans may have the benefit of a general payment guaranty of a portion of the indebtedness under the mortgage loan. In all cases, however, the mortgage loans should be considered to be non-recourse obligations because neither the depositor nor the sponsors make any representation or warranty as to the obligation or ability of any borrower or guarantor to pay any deficiencies between any foreclosure proceeds and the mortgage loan indebtedness. No mortgage loan will be insured or guaranteed by any government, governmental instrumentality, private insurer or (except as described above) other person or entity.

Adverse Environmental Conditions at or Near Mortgaged Properties May Result in Losses

The issuing entity could become liable for a material adverse environmental condition at an underlying mortgaged property. Any such potential liability could reduce or delay payments on the offered certificates. Environmental reports were prepared for the mortgaged properties as described in “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Environmental Considerations” in this prospectus supplement, however, it is possible that the environmental reports and/or supplemental “Phase II” sampling did not reveal all environmental liabilities, or that there are material environmental liabilities of which we are not aware. Also, the environmental condition of the mortgaged properties in the future could be affected by the activities of tenants and occupants or by third parties unrelated to the borrowers. For a more detailed description of environmental matters that may affect the mortgaged properties, see “Risk Factors—Environmental Liabilities Will Adversely Affect the Value and Operation of the Contaminated Property and May Deter a Lender from Foreclosing” and “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Environmental Considerations” in the prospectus.

Risks Related to Redevelopment, Expansion and Renovation at Mortgaged Properties

Certain of the mortgaged properties are properties which are currently undergoing or, in the future, are expected to undergo redevelopment, expansion or renovation. To the extent applicable, we cannot assure you that any escrow or reserve collected will be sufficient to complete the current renovation or be otherwise sufficient to satisfy any tenant improvement expenses at a mortgaged property. Failure to complete those planned improvements may have a material adverse effect on the cash flow at the mortgaged property and the related borrower’s ability to meet its payment obligations under the related mortgage loan documents.

Certain of the hospitality properties securing the mortgage loans are currently undergoing or are scheduled to undergo renovations or property improvement plans (“PIPs”). In some circumstances, these renovations or PIPs may necessitate taking a portion of the available guest rooms temporarily offline, temporarily decreasing the

S-85

number of available rooms and the revenue generating capacity of the related hotel. In other cases, these renovations may involve renovations of common spaces or external features of the related hotel, which may cause disruptions or otherwise decrease the attractiveness of the related hotel to potential guests. These PIPs may be required under the related franchise or management agreement and a failure to timely complete them may result in a termination or expiration of a franchise or management agreement and may be an event of default under the related mortgage loan.

Certain of the retail properties securing the mortgage loans are currently undergoing or are scheduled to undergo renovations or property expansions. Such renovations or expansions may be required under one or more tenant leases and a failure to timely complete such renovations or expansions may result in a termination of any such lease and may have a material adverse effect on the cash flow at any such mortgaged property and the related borrower’s ability to meet its payment obligations under the related mortgage loan documents.

We cannot assure you that current or planned redevelopment, expansion or renovation will be completed, that such redevelopment, expansion or renovation will be completed in the time frame contemplated, or that, when and if redevelopment, expansion or renovation is completed, such redevelopment, expansion or renovation will improve the operations at, or increase the value of, the related mortgaged property. Failure of any of the foregoing to occur could have a material negative impact on the related mortgaged property, which could affect the ability of the related borrower to repay the related mortgage loan.

In the event the related borrower fails to pay the costs for work completed or material delivered in connection with such ongoing redevelopment, expansion or renovation, the portion of the mortgaged property on which there are renovations may be subject to mechanics’ or materialmen’s liens that may be senior to the lien of the related mortgage loan.

The existence of construction or renovation at a mortgaged property may make such mortgaged property less attractive to tenants or their customers, and accordingly could have a negative effect on net operating income. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Redevelopment, Expansion and Renovation” in this prospectus supplement for information regarding mortgaged properties which are currently undergoing or, in the future, are expected to undergo redevelopment or renovation.

Risks Relating to Costs of Compliance with Applicable Laws and Regulations

A borrower may be required to incur costs to comply with various existing and future federal, state or local laws and regulations applicable to the related mortgaged property, for example, zoning laws and the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, which requires all public accommodations to meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by persons with disabilities. See “Risk Factors—Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 May Be Expensive” and “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Americans with Disabilities Act” in the prospectus. The expenditure of these costs or the imposition of injunctive relief, penalties or fines in connection with the borrower’s noncompliance could negatively impact the borrower’s cash flow and, consequently, its ability to pay its mortgage loan.

Litigation Regarding the Mortgaged Properties or Borrowers May Impair Your Distributions

There may be (and there may exist from time to time) pending or threatened legal proceedings against, or disputes with, the borrowers, the property sponsors and the managers of the mortgaged properties and their respective affiliates arising out of their ordinary business. We have not undertaken a search for all legal proceedings that relate to the borrowers, property sponsors or managers for the mortgaged properties and their respective affiliates. Potential investors are advised and encouraged to perform their own searches related to such matters to the extent relevant to their investment decision. Any such litigation or dispute may materially impair distributions to certificateholders if borrowers or property sponsors must use property income or other income to pay judgments, legal fees or litigation costs. We cannot assure you that any litigation or dispute or any settlement of any litigation or dispute will not have a material adverse effect on your investment.

In addition, in the event the owner of a borrower experiences financial problems, we cannot assure you that such owner would not attempt to take actions with respect to the mortgaged property that may adversely affect the borrower’s ability to fulfill its obligations under the related mortgage loan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Litigation Considerations” in this prospectus supplement for information regarding litigation matters with respect to certain mortgage loans.

S-86

Other Financings or Ability to Incur Other Financings Entails Risk

When a borrower (or its constituent members) also has one or more other outstanding loans (even if they are pari passu, subordinated, mezzanine or unsecured loans or another type of equity pledge), the issuing entity is subjected to additional risk such as:

· the borrower (or its constituent members) may have difficulty servicing and repaying multiple loans;

· the existence of another loan will generally also make it more difficult for the borrower to obtain refinancing of the related mortgage loan (or loan combination, if applicable) or sell the related mortgaged property and may thereby jeopardize repayment of the mortgage loan (or loan combination, if applicable);

· the need to service additional debt may reduce the cash flow available to the borrower to operate and maintain the mortgaged property and the value of the mortgaged property may decline as a result;

· if a borrower (or its constituent members) defaults on its mortgage loan and/or any other loan, actions taken by other lenders such as a suit for collection, foreclosure or an involuntary petition for bankruptcy against the borrower could impair the security available to the issuing entity, including the mortgaged property, or stay the issuing entity’s ability to foreclose during the course of the bankruptcy case;

· the bankruptcy of another lender also may operate to stay foreclosure by the issuing entity; and

· the issuing entity may also be subject to the costs and administrative burdens of involvement in foreclosure or bankruptcy proceedings or related litigation.

With respect to any split mortgage loan, although each related companion loan is not an asset of the issuing entity, the related borrower is still obligated to make interest and principal payments on each related companion loan. As a result, the issuing entity is subject to additional risks, including:

· the risk that the necessary maintenance of the related mortgaged property could be deferred to allow the borrower to pay the required debt service on these other obligations and that the value of the mortgaged property may fall as a result; and

· the risk that it may be more difficult for the borrower to refinance these loans or to sell the related mortgaged property for purposes of making any balloon payment on the entire balance of such loans and the related additional debt at maturity.

With respect to mezzanine financing, while a mezzanine lender has no security interest in the related mortgaged properties, a default under a mezzanine loan could cause a change in control of the related borrower. With respect to mortgage loans that permit mezzanine financing, the relative rights of the mortgagee and the related mezzanine lender will generally be set forth in an intercreditor agreement, which agreements typically provide that the rights of the mezzanine lender (including the right to payment) against the borrower and mortgaged property are subordinate to the rights of the mortgage lender and that the mezzanine lender may not take any enforcement action against the mortgage borrower and mortgaged property.

In addition, the mortgage loan documents related to certain mortgage loans may allow the related borrower to employ so-called “preferred equity” structures, where one or more special limited partners or members receive a preferred return in exchange for an infusion of capital or other type of equity pledge that may require payments of excess cash flow. Such arrangements can present risks that resemble mezzanine debt, including dilution of the sponsor’s equity in the mortgaged property, stress on the cash flow in the form of a preferred return or excess cash payments, and/or potential changes in the management of the related mortgaged property in the event the preferred return is not satisfied.

S-87

For additional information, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans—Additional Indebtedness”, “—The Loan Combinations” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.

A Borrower May Be Unable to Repay Its Remaining Principal Balance on the Maturity Date or Anticipated Repayment Date; Longer Amortization Schedules and Interest-Only Provisions Increase Risk

Mortgage loans with substantial remaining principal balances at their maturity date or anticipated repayment date, as applicable, involve greater risk than fully-amortizing mortgage loans. This is because the borrower may be unable to repay the mortgage loan at that time. In addition, fully amortizing mortgage loans which may pay interest on an “actual/360” basis but have fixed monthly payments may, in effect, have a small balloon payment due at maturity.

All of the mortgage loans have amortization schedules that are significantly longer than their respective terms to maturity (or, if applicable, any related anticipated repayment date), and many of the mortgage loans require only payments of interest for part or all of such respective terms. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Due Dates; Mortgage Loan Rates; Calculations of Interest” in this prospectus supplement. A longer amortization schedule or an interest-only provision in a mortgage loan will result in a higher amount of principal outstanding under the mortgage loan at any particular time, including at the maturity date (or, if applicable, anticipated repayment date) of the mortgage loan, than would have otherwise been the case had a shorter amortization schedule been used or had the mortgage loan had a shorter interest-only period or not included an interest-only provision at all. That higher principal amount outstanding could both (i) make it more difficult for the related borrower to make the required balloon payment at maturity and (ii) lead to increased losses for the issuing entity either during the loan term or at maturity if the mortgage loan becomes a defaulted mortgage loan.

A borrower’s ability to repay a mortgage loan (or loan combination) on its maturity date or anticipated repayment date, as applicable, typically will depend upon its ability either to refinance the mortgage loan (or loan combination) or to sell the mortgaged property at a price sufficient to permit repayment. A borrower’s ability to achieve either of these goals will be affected by a number of factors, including:

· the availability of, and competition for, credit for commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing community real estate projects, which fluctuate over time;

· the prevailing interest rates;

· the net operating income generated by the mortgaged property;

· the fair market value of the related mortgaged property;

· the borrower’s equity in the related mortgaged property;

· significant tenant rollover at the related mortgaged properties (see “Risk Factors—The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered Certificates May Present Special Risks—Retail Properties” and “—The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered Certificates May Present Special Risks—Office Properties” in the prospectus);

· the borrower’s financial condition;

· the operating history and occupancy level of the mortgaged property;

· reductions in applicable government assistance/rent subsidy programs;

· the tax laws; and

· prevailing general and regional economic conditions.

S-88

With respect to any split mortgage loan, the risks relating to balloon payment obligations are enhanced by the existence of the related companion loan(s).

Whether or not losses are ultimately sustained, any delay in the collection of a balloon payment on the maturity date or anticipated repayment date that would otherwise be distributable on your certificates will likely extend the weighted average life of your certificates.

None of the sponsors, any party to the pooling and servicing agreement or any other person will be under any obligation to refinance any mortgage loan. However, in order to maximize recoveries on defaulted mortgage loans, the pooling and servicing agreement permits the special servicer (and each outside servicing agreement governing the servicing of an outside serviced mortgage loan permits the related outside special servicer) to extend and modify mortgage loans in a manner consistent with the applicable servicing standard, subject to the limitations (or, in the case of an outside serviced mortgage loan, limitations of the type) described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans—Modifications, Waivers and Amendments” in this prospectus supplement. We cannot assure you, however, that any extension or modification will increase the present value of recoveries in a given case.

Neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will have the ability to extend or modify an outside serviced mortgage loan because each outside serviced mortgage loan is being serviced pursuant to the applicable outside servicing agreement. Whether or not losses are ultimately sustained, any delay in collection of a balloon payment that would otherwise be distributable in respect of a class of certificates, whether such delay is due to a borrower default or to modification of an outside serviced mortgage loan by the outside special servicer, will likely extend the weighted average life of such class of certificates.

The credit crisis and economic downturn have resulted in tightened lending standards and a reduction in capital available to refinance commercial mortgage loans at maturity. These factors have increased the risk that refinancing may not be available for commercial mortgage loans. We cannot assure you that each borrower under a balloon loan will have the ability to repay the principal balance of such mortgage loan on the related maturity date or anticipated repayment date, as applicable.

See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.

Risks Relating to Interest on Advances and Special Servicing Compensation

To the extent described in this prospectus supplement, the master servicer, the special servicer and the trustee will each be entitled to receive interest on unreimbursed advances made by it at the “Prime Rate” as published in The Wall Street Journal. This interest will generally accrue from the date on which the related advance is made or the related expense is incurred to the date of reimbursement. In addition, under certain circumstances, including delinquencies in the payment of principal and/or interest, a mortgage loan will be specially serviced and the special servicer (or, with respect to an outside serviced mortgage loan, the outside special servicer) will be entitled to compensation for special servicing activities. The right to receive interest on advances or special servicing compensation is senior to the rights of certificateholders to receive distributions on the offered certificates. The payment of interest on advances and the payment of compensation to the special servicer may lead to shortfalls in amounts otherwise distributable on your certificates.

Increases in Real Estate Taxes May Reduce Available Funds

Certain of the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans have or may in the future have the benefit of reduced real estate taxes in connection with a local government “payment in lieu of taxes” program (often known as a “PILOT” program) or other tax abatement arrangements. Upon expiration of such program or if such programs were otherwise terminated, the related borrower would be required to pay higher, and in some cases substantially higher, real estate taxes. Prior to expiration of such program, the tax benefit to the mortgaged property may decrease throughout the term of the expiration date until the expiration of such program. An increase in real estate taxes may impact the ability of the borrower to pay debt service on the mortgage loan.

See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Real Estate and Other Tax Considerations” in this prospectus supplement for descriptions of real estate tax matters relating to certain mortgaged properties.

S-89

Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses

Some of the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity may not be readily convertible (or convertible at all) to alternative uses if those properties were to become unprofitable for any reason. For example, a mortgaged property may not be readily convertible due to restrictive covenants related to such mortgaged property, including in the case of mortgaged properties that are subject to a condominium regime or subject to a ground lease, the use and other restrictions imposed by the condominium declaration and other related documents, especially in a situation where a mortgaged property does not represent the entire condominium regime. Additionally, any vacancy with respect to self storage facilities, hospitality properties, independent living facilities, bowling alleys, restaurants, shopping malls, water parks, theater space, dental or medical offices, health clubs, martial arts studios, gas stations, data centers and warehouses would not be easily converted to other uses due to their unique construction requirements. In addition, converting commercial properties to alternate uses generally requires substantial capital expenditures and could result in a significant adverse effect on, or interruption of, the revenues generated by such properties.

In addition, the limited adaptability of certain shopping malls that have proven unprofitable may result in high (and possibly extremely high) loss severities on mortgage loans secured by those shopping malls. For example, it is possible that a significant amount of advances made by the applicable servicer(s) of a mortgage loan secured by a shopping mall property, combined with low liquidation proceeds in respect of that property, may result in a loss severity exceeding 100% of the outstanding principal balance of that mortgage loan.

Condominium interests in buildings and/or other improvements in some cases constitute less than a majority of voting rights and result in the related borrower not having control of the related condominium or owners association. The board of managers or directors of the related condominium generally has discretion to make decisions affecting the condominium, and we cannot assure you that the related borrower under a mortgage loan secured by one or more interests in that condominium will have any control over decisions made by the related board of managers or directors. Thus, decisions made by that board of managers or directors, including regarding assessments to be paid by the unit owners, insurance to be maintained on the condominium and many other decisions affecting the maintenance of that condominium, may have a significant impact on the related mortgage loans that are secured by mortgaged properties consisting of such condominium interests. We cannot assure you that the related board of managers or directors will always act in the best interests of the related borrower under the related mortgage loans. In addition, with respect to each such mortgage loan, there are certain circumstances when insurance proceeds must be used to repair and restore the related mortgaged property in accordance with the terms of the governing documents for the related condominium.

In addition, due to the nature of condominiums, a default on the part of the borrower with respect to such mortgaged properties will not allow the special servicer the same flexibility in realizing on the collateral as is generally available with respect to commercial properties that are not condominium units. The rights of other unit or property owners, the documents governing the management of the condominium units and the state and local laws applicable to condominium units must be considered. In addition, in the event of a casualty with respect to a condominium, due to the possible existence of multiple loss payees on any insurance policy covering such property, there could be a delay in the allocation of related insurance proceeds, if any. Consequently, servicing and realizing upon the collateral consisting of condominium interests could subject the certificateholders to a greater delay, expense and risk than with respect to a mortgage loan secured by a commercial property that is not a condominium unit.

Furthermore, certain properties may be subject to certain low-income housing restrictions in order to remain eligible for low-income housing tax credits or governmental subsidized rental payments that could prevent the conversion of the mortgaged property to alternative uses. The liquidation value of any mortgaged property, subject to limitations of the kind described above or other limitations on convertibility of use, may be substantially less than would be the case if the property were readily adaptable to other uses. See “Risk Factors—The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered Certificates May Present Special Risks—Multifamily Rental Properties” in the prospectus.

Zoning or other restrictions also may prevent alternative uses. See “—Risks Related to Zoning Non-Compliance and Use Restrictions” below.

S-90

Risks Related to Zoning Non-Compliance and Use Restrictions

Certain of the mortgaged properties may not comply with current zoning laws, including density, use, parking, height, landscaping, open space and set back requirements, due to changes in zoning requirements after such mortgaged properties were constructed. These properties, as well as those for which variances or special permits were issued or for which non-conformity with current zoning laws is otherwise permitted, are considered to be a “legal non-conforming use” and/or the improvements are considered to be “legal non-conforming structures.” This means that the borrower is not required to alter its structure to comply with the existing or new law; however, the borrower may not be able to rebuild the premises “as-is” in the event of a substantial casualty loss. This may adversely affect the cash flow of the property following the loss. If a substantial casualty were to occur, we cannot assure you that insurance proceeds would be available to pay the mortgage loan in full. In addition, if a non-conforming use were to be discontinued and/or the property were repaired or restored in conformity with the current law, the value of the property or the revenue producing potential of the property may not be equal to that before the casualty.

In addition, certain of the mortgaged properties that do not conform to current zoning laws may not be “legal non-conforming uses” or “legal non-conforming structures.” The failure of a mortgaged property to comply with zoning laws or to be a “legal non-conforming use” or “legal non-conforming structure” may adversely affect the market value of the mortgaged property or the borrower’s ability to continue to use it in the manner it is currently being used or may necessitate material additional expenditures to remedy non-conformities. In some cases, the related borrower has obtained law and ordinance insurance to cover additional costs that result from rebuilding or building improvements at the mortgaged property in accordance with current zoning requirements. However, if as a result of the applicable zoning laws the rebuilt improvements are smaller or less attractive to tenants than the original improvements, the resulting loss in income will generally not be covered by law and ordinance insurance.

In addition, certain of the mortgaged properties may be subject to certain use restrictions and/or operational requirements imposed pursuant to development agreements, ground leases, restrictive covenants, reciprocal easement agreements or operating agreements or historical landmark designations or, in the case of those mortgaged properties that are condominiums, condominium declarations or other condominium use restrictions or regulations, especially in a situation where the mortgaged property does not represent the entire condominium building. Such use restrictions could include, for example, limitations on the character of the improvements or the properties, limitations affecting noise and parking requirements, among other things, and limitations on the borrowers’ right to operate certain types of facilities within a prescribed radius. These limitations impose upon the borrower stricter requirements with respect to repairs and alterations, including following a casualty loss. These limitations could adversely affect the ability of the related borrower to lease the mortgaged property on favorable terms, thus adversely affecting the borrower’s ability to fulfill its obligations under the related mortgage loan.

See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Zoning and Use Restrictions” in this prospectus supplement for examples of mortgaged properties that are subject to restrictions relating to the use of the mortgaged properties or have other material zoning issues.

Risks Relating to Inspections of Properties

Licensed engineers or consultants inspected the mortgaged properties at or about the time of the origination of the mortgage loans to assess items such as structural integrity of the buildings and other improvements on the mortgaged property, including exterior walls, roofing, interior construction, mechanical and electrical systems and general condition of the site, buildings and other improvements. However, we cannot assure you that all conditions requiring repair or replacement were identified. No additional property inspections were conducted in connection with the closing of the offered certificates.

Earthquake, Flood and Other Insurance May Not Be Available or Adequate

Although the mortgaged properties are required to be insured, or self-insured by a sole tenant of a related building or group of buildings, against certain risks, there is a possibility of casualty loss with respect to the mortgaged properties for which insurance proceeds may not be adequate or which may result from risks not covered by insurance.

Furthermore, with respect to certain mortgage loans, the insurable value of the related mortgaged property as of the origination date of the related mortgage loan was lower than the principal balance of the related mortgage

S-91

loan. In the event of a casualty when a borrower is not required to rebuild or cannot rebuild, we cannot assure you that the insurance required with respect to the related mortgaged property will be sufficient to pay the related mortgage loan in full and there is no “gap” insurance required under such mortgage loan to cover any difference. In those circumstances, a casualty that occurs near the maturity date may result in an extension of the maturity date of the mortgage loan if the special servicer, in accordance with the servicing standard, determines that such extension was in the best interest of certificateholders.

In addition, certain types of mortgaged properties, such as manufactured housing and recreational vehicle communities, have few or no insurable buildings or improvements and thus do not have casualty insurance or low limits of casualty insurance in comparison with the related mortgage loan balances.

In addition, hazard insurance policies will typically contain co-insurance clauses that in effect require an insured at all times to carry insurance of a specified percentage, generally 80% to 90%, of the full replacement value of the improvements on the related mortgaged property in order to recover the full amount of any partial loss. As a result, even if insurance coverage is maintained, if the insured’s coverage falls below this specified percentage, those clauses generally provide that the insurer’s liability in the event of partial loss does not exceed the lesser of (1) the replacement cost of the improvements less physical depreciation and (2) that proportion of the loss as the amount of insurance carried bears to the specified percentage of the full replacement cost of those improvements.

Ten (10) of the mortgaged properties, securing approximately 17.6% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date by allocated loan amount, are located in areas that are considered a high earthquake risk (seismic zones 3 or 4). Seismic reports were prepared with respect to these mortgaged properties, and based on those reports, no mortgaged property has a seismic expected loss of greater than 15%.

The mortgage loans do not require flood insurance on the related mortgaged properties unless they are in a flood zone and flood insurance is available; and, in certain instances, even where the related mortgaged property was in a flood zone and flood insurance was available, flood insurance was not required.

We cannot assure you that the borrowers will in the future be able to comply with requirements to maintain adequate insurance with respect to the mortgaged properties, and any uninsured loss could have a material adverse impact on the amount available to make payments on the related mortgage loan, and consequently, the offered certificates. As with all real estate, if reconstruction (for example, following fire or other casualty) or any major repair or improvement is required to the damaged property, changes in laws and governmental regulations may be applicable and may materially affect the cost to, or ability of, the borrowers to effect such reconstruction, major repair or improvement. As a result, the amount realized with respect to the mortgaged properties, and the amount available to make payments on the related mortgage loan, and consequently, the offered certificates, could be reduced. In addition, we cannot assure you that the amount of insurance required or provided would be sufficient to cover damages caused by any casualty, or that such insurance will be available in the future at commercially reasonable rates.

Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties

The occurrence or the possibility of terrorist attacks could (1) lead to damage to one or more of the mortgaged properties if any terrorist attacks occur or (2) result in higher costs for security and insurance premiums or diminish the availability of insurance coverage for losses related to terrorist attacks, particularly for large properties, which could adversely affect the cash flow at those mortgaged properties.

After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York City and the Washington, D.C. area, all forms of insurance were impacted, particularly from a cost and availability perspective, including comprehensive general liability and business interruption or rent loss insurance policies required by typical mortgage loans. To give time for private markets to develop a pricing mechanism for terrorism risk and to build capacity to absorb future losses that may occur due to terrorism, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 was enacted on November 26, 2002, establishing the Terrorism Insurance Program. The Terrorism Insurance Program was extended through December 31, 2014 by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 and was subsequently reauthorized on January 12, 2015 for a period of six years through December 31, 2020 pursuant to the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015 (“TRIPRA”).

S-92

The Terrorism Insurance Program requires insurance carriers to provide terrorism coverage in their basic “all-risk” policies. Any commercial property and casualty terrorism insurance exclusion that was in force on November 26, 2002 is automatically void to the extent that it excluded losses that would otherwise be insured losses. Any state approval of those types of exclusions in force on November 26, 2002 is also void.

Under the Terrorism Insurance Program, the federal government shares in the risk of losses occurring within the United States resulting from acts committed in an effort to influence or coerce United States civilians or the United States government. The federal share of compensation for insured losses of an insurer equals 85% (subject to annual 1% decreases beginning in 2016 until such percentage equals 80%) of the portion of such insured losses that exceed a deductible equal to 20% of the value of the insurer’s direct earned premiums over the calendar year immediately preceding that program year. Federal compensation in any program year is capped at $100 billion (with insurers being liable for any amount that exceeds such cap), and no compensation is payable with respect to a terrorist act unless the aggregate industry losses relating to such act exceed $100 million (subject to annual $20 million increases beginning in 2016 until such threshold equals $200 million). The Terrorism Insurance Program does not cover nuclear, biological, chemical or radiological attacks. Unless a borrower obtains separate coverage for events that do not meet the thresholds or other requirements above, such events will not be covered.

If the Terrorism Insurance Program is not reenacted after its expiration in 2020, premiums for terrorism insurance coverage will likely increase and the terms of such insurance policies may be materially amended to increase stated exclusions or to otherwise effectively decrease the scope of coverage available (perhaps to the point where it is effectively not available). In addition, to the extent that any insurance policies contain “sunset clauses” (i.e., clauses that void terrorism coverage if the federal insurance backstop program is not renewed), then such policies may cease to provide terrorism insurance upon the expiration of the Terrorism Insurance Program. We cannot assure you that the Terrorism Insurance Program or any successor program will create any long term changes in the availability and cost of such insurance. Moreover, future legislation, including regulations expected to be adopted by the Treasury Department pursuant to TRIPRA, may have a material effect on the availability of federal assistance in the terrorism insurance market. In addition, the failure to maintain such terrorism insurance may constitute a default under the related mortgage loan. Even if terrorism insurance is required by the mortgage loan documents for a mortgage loan, that requirement may be subject to a cap on the cost of the premium for terrorism insurance that a borrower is required to pay or a commercially reasonable standard on the availability or cost of the insurance. See “Structural and Collateral Term Sheet” in Annex B to this prospectus supplement for a description of any requirements for terrorism insurance for the largest 10 mortgage loans by aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date. To the extent that uninsured or underinsured casualty losses occur with respect to the related mortgaged properties, losses on the mortgage loans may result.

Other mortgaged properties securing mortgage loans may also be insured under a blanket policy or self-insured or insured by a sole tenant. See “—Risks Associated with Blanket Insurance Policies or Self-Insurance” below.

We cannot assure you that terrorism insurance or the Terrorism Insurance Program will be available or provide sufficient protection against risks of loss on the mortgaged properties resulting from acts of terrorism.

As a result of any of the foregoing, the amount available to make distributions on your certificates could be reduced.

Risks Associated with Blanket Insurance Policies or Self-Insurance

Certain of the mortgaged properties are covered by blanket insurance policies, which also cover other properties of the related borrower or its affiliates (including certain properties in close proximity to the mortgaged properties). In the event that such policies are drawn on to cover losses on such other properties, the amount of insurance coverage available under such policies would thereby be reduced and could be insufficient to cover each mortgaged property’s insurable risks. In addition, with respect to some of the mortgaged properties, a sole or significant tenant is allowed to provide self-insurance against risks.

Additionally, if the mortgage loans that allow coverage under blanket insurance policies are part of a group of mortgage loans with related borrowers, then all of the related mortgaged properties may be covered under the same blanket policy, which may also cover other properties owned by affiliates of such borrowers.

S-93

Certain mortgaged properties may also be insured or self-insured by a sole or significant tenant, as further described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Insurance Considerations” in this prospectus supplement.

State and Local Mortgage Recording Taxes May Apply Upon a Foreclosure or Deed-in-Lieu of Foreclosure and Reduce Net Proceeds

Many jurisdictions impose recording taxes on mortgages which, if not paid at the time of the recording of the mortgage, may impair the ability of the lender to foreclose the mortgage. Such taxes, interest, and penalties could be significant in amount and would, if imposed, reduce the net proceeds realized by the issuing entity in liquidating the real property securing the related mortgage loan.

The Mortgage Loan Sellers, the Sponsors and the Depositor Are Subject to Bankruptcy or Insolvency Laws That May Affect the Issuing Entity’s Ownership of the Mortgage Loans

In the event of the bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or conservatorship of an originator, a mortgage loan seller or the depositor (or certain affiliates thereof), it is possible that the issuing entity’s right to payment from or ownership of certain of the mortgage loans could be challenged. If such challenge is successful, payments on the offered certificates would be reduced or delayed. Even if the challenge is not successful, payments on the offered certificates would be delayed while a court resolves the claim.

An opinion of counsel will be rendered on the closing date to the effect that the transfer of the applicable mortgage loans by the mortgage loan sellers to the depositor would generally be respected as a sale in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of such mortgage loan sellers. Such opinions, however, are subject to various assumptions and qualifications, and there can be no assurance that a bankruptcy trustee, if applicable, or other interested party will not attempt to challenge the issuing entity’s right to payment with respect to the related mortgage loans. Legal opinions do not provide any guaranty as to what any particular court would actually decide, but rather an opinion as to the decision a court would reach if the issues were competently presented and the court followed existing precedent as to legal and equitable principles applicable in bankruptcy cases. In this regard, legal opinions on bankruptcy law matters have inherent limitations primarily because of the pervasive equity powers of bankruptcy courts, the overriding goal of reorganization to which other legal rights and other policies may be subordinated, the potential relevance to the exercise of judicial discretion of future arising facts and circumstances, and the nature of the bankruptcy process. As a result, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), a creditor, a bankruptcy trustee or another interested party, including an entity transferring a mortgage loan as debtor-in-possession, could still attempt to assert that the transfer of a mortgage loan was not a sale. If such party’s challenge were successful, payments on the certificates would be reduced or delayed. Even if the challenge were not successful, payments on the certificates would be delayed while a court resolves the claim.

Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, a sponsor and an originator, is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Goldman Sachs Bank USA (“GS Bank”), a New York State chartered bank, the deposits of which are insured by the FDIC. If GS Bank were to become subject to receivership, the proceeding would be administered by the FDIC under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the “FDIA”); likewise, if GS Bank were to become subject to conservatorship, the agency appointed as conservator would likely be the FDIC as well. The FDIA gives the FDIC the power to disaffirm or repudiate contracts to which a bank is party at the time of receivership or conservatorship and the performance of which the FDIC determines to be burdensome, in which case the counterparty to the contract has a claim for payment by the receivership or conservatorship estate of “actual direct compensatory damages” as of the date of receivership or conservatorship.

The FDIC has adopted a rule, substantially revised and effective January 1, 2011, establishing a safe harbor (the “FDIC Safe Harbor”) from its repudiation powers for securitizations meeting the requirements of the rule (12 C.F.R. § 360.6). The transfer of the applicable mortgage loans by Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company to the depositor will not qualify for the FDIC Safe Harbor. However, the transfer by Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company is not a transfer by a bank, and in any event, even if the FDIC Safe Harbor were applicable to such transfer, the FDIC Safe Harbor is non-exclusive.

The issuing entity has been organized as a common law trust, and as such is not eligible to be a “debtor” under the federal bankruptcy laws. If the issuing entity were instead characterized as a “business trust” it could qualify as a debtor under those laws. Bankruptcy courts look at various considerations in making this determination, so it is not possible to predict with any certainty whether or not the issuing entity would be

S-94

characterized as a “business trust.” If a bankruptcy court were to determine that the issuing entity was a “business trust”, it is possible that payments on the certificates would be delayed while the court resolved the issue.

Furthermore, Title II of the Dodd-Frank Act provides for an orderly liquidation authority (“OLA”) under which the FDIC can be appointed as receiver of certain systemically important non-bank financial companies and their direct or indirect subsidiaries in certain cases. We make no representation as to whether this would apply to any of the sponsors. In January 2011, a former acting general counsel of the FDIC issued a letter in which he expressed his view that, under then-existing regulations, the FDIC, as receiver under the OLA, would not, in the exercise of its OLA repudiation powers, recover as property of a financial company assets transferred by the financial company, provided that the transfer satisfies the conditions for the exclusion of assets from the financial company’s estate under the bankruptcy code. The letter further noted that, while the FDIC staff may be considering recommending further regulations under OLA, its author (the former acting general counsel referred to above) would recommend that such regulations incorporate a 90 day transition period for any provisions affecting the FDIC’s statutory power to disaffirm or repudiate contracts. If, however, the FDIC were to adopt a different approach than that described in the former acting general counsel’s letter, delays or reductions in payments on the offered certificates would occur. As such, we cannot assure you that a bankruptcy would not result in a delay or reduction in payments on the certificates.

Interests and Incentives of the Originators, the Sponsors and Their Affiliates May Not Be Aligned with Your Interests

The originators, the sponsors and their affiliates (including certain of the underwriters) expect to derive ancillary benefits from this offering and their respective incentives may not be aligned with those of purchasers of the offered certificates. The sponsors originated or purchased the mortgage loans in order to securitize the mortgage loans by means of a transaction such as the offering of the offered certificates. The sponsors will sell the mortgage loans to the depositor (an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp., one of the sponsors, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., one of the underwriters) on the closing date in exchange for cash, derived from the sale of the offered certificates to investors and/or in exchange for offered certificates. A completed offering would reduce the originators’ exposure to the mortgage loans. The originators made the mortgage loans with a view toward securitizing them and distributing the exposure by means of a transaction such as this offering of offered certificates. In addition, certain mortgaged properties may have tenants that are affiliated with the related originator. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues—Affiliated Leases” in this prospectus supplement. This offering of offered certificates will effectively transfer the originators’ exposure to the mortgage loans to purchasers of the offered certificates.

The originators, the sponsors and their affiliates expect to receive various benefits, including compensation, commissions, payments, rebates, remuneration and business opportunities, in connection with or as a result of this offering of offered certificates and their interests in the mortgage loans. The sponsors and their affiliates will effectively receive compensation, and may record a profit, in an amount based on, among other things, the amount of proceeds (net of transaction expenses) received from the sale of the offered certificates to investors relative to their investment in the mortgage loans. The benefits to the originators, the sponsors and their affiliates arising from the decision to securitize the mortgage loans may be greater than they would have been had other assets been selected.

Furthermore, the sponsors and/or their affiliates may benefit from a completed offering of the offered certificates because the offering would establish a market precedent and a valuation data point for securities similar to the offered certificates, thus enhancing the ability of the sponsors and their affiliates to conduct similar offerings in the future and permitting them to adjust the fair value of the mortgage loans or other similar assets or securities held on their balance sheet, including increasing the carrying value or avoiding decreasing the carrying value of some or all of such similar positions.

In addition, the originators, the sponsors or any of their respective affiliates may benefit from certain relationships, including financial dealings, with any borrower, any non-recourse carveout guarantor or any of their respective affiliates, aside from the origination of mortgage loans or contribution of mortgage loans into this securitization transaction.

The originators and/or their respective affiliates may have originated and sold or retained mezzanine loans and/or companion loans (or may in the future originate permitted mezzanine loans) related to the mortgage loans. Such transactions may cause the originators and their affiliates or their clients or counterparties who purchase the

S-95

mezzanine loans and/or companion loans, as applicable, to have economic interests and incentives that do not align with, and that may be directly contrary to, those of an investor in the offered certificates. In addition, these transactions or actions taken to maintain, adjust or unwind any positions in the future, may, individually or in the aggregate, have a material effect on the market for the offered certificates (if any), including adversely affecting the value of the offered certificates, particularly in illiquid markets. The originators, the sponsors and their affiliates will have no obligation to take, refrain from taking or cease taking any action with respect to a mezzanine loan based on the potential effect on an investor in the offered certificates, and may receive substantial returns from these transactions.

In connection with the foregoing, it should be noted that, on the closing date, Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC, is the holder of the mezzanine loan related to the mortgage loan secured by the mortgaged property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Greylyn Business Park, representing approximately 3.7% of the aggregate principal balance of the mortgage pool as of the cut-off date.

In some cases, the originators or their affiliates may be the holders of companion loans related to their mortgage loans. For example, Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp., an originator and a sponsor, is the current holder of the Illinois Center pari passu companion loans, and Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, an originator and a sponsor, is the current holder of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio pari passu companion loans. Any holder of any such pari passu companion loan will have certain consultation rights with respect to servicing decisions involving the related serviced loan combination or outside serviced loan combination, as applicable. However, (i) with respect to a serviced loan combination, neither the master servicer nor the special servicer will be required to take or to refrain from taking any action pursuant to the advice, recommendations or instructions from the holder of a serviced pari passu companion loan or its representative, or due to any failure to approve an action by any such party, or due to an objection by any such party that would cause either the master servicer or the special servicer to violate applicable law, the related mortgage loan documents, the pooling and servicing agreement (including the servicing standard), any related co-lender agreement or intercreditor agreement or the REMIC provisions of the Code, and (ii) with respect to an outside serviced loan combination, neither the outside servicer nor the outside special servicer will be required to take or to refrain from taking any action pursuant to the advice, recommendations or instructions from the holder of an outside serviced companion loan or its representative, or due to any failure to approve an action by any such party, or due to an objection by any such party that would cause either the outside servicer or the outside special servicer to violate applicable law, the related mortgage loan documents, the outside servicing agreement (including the servicing standard), any related co-lender agreement or intercreditor agreement or the REMIC provisions of the Code. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Statistical Characteristics of Mortgage Loans—Additional Indebtedness” and “—The Loan Combinations” in this prospectus supplement for more information regarding the rights of any serviced companion loan holder.

Further, various originators, sponsors and their respective affiliates are acting in multiple capacities in or with respect to this transaction, which may include, without limitation, acting as one or more transaction parties or a subcontractor or vendor thereof, participating in interim servicing and/or custodial arrangements with certain transaction parties, providing warehouse financing to, or receiving warehouse financing from, certain other originators or sponsors prior to transfer of the related mortgage loans to the issuing entity, performing certain underwriting services for the originators on a contractual basis and/or conducting due diligence on behalf of an investor with respect to the underlying mortgage loans prior to their transfer to the issuing entity. For a description of certain of the foregoing relationships and arrangements, see “Transaction Parties—Certain Affiliations and Certain Relationships” in this prospectus supplement.

These roles and other potential relationships may give rise to conflicts of interest as described above and under “—Interests and Incentives of the Underwriter Entities May Not Be Aligned with Your Interests,” “—Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Selection of the Underlying Mortgage Loans” and “—Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment” below. Each of the foregoing relationships and related interests should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any offered certificates.

Interests and Incentives of the Underwriter Entities May Not Be Aligned with Your Interests

The activities and interests of the underwriters and their respective affiliates (collectively, the “Underwriter Entities”) will not align with, and may in fact be directly contrary to, those of the certificateholders. The Underwriter Entities are each part of separate global investment banking, securities and investment management firms that provide a wide range of financial services to a substantial and diversified client base that includes corporations, financial institutions, governments and high-net-worth individuals. As such, they actively make

S-96

markets in and trade financial instruments for their own account and for the accounts of customers. These financial instruments include debt and equity securities, currencies, commodities, bank loans, indices, baskets and other products. The Underwriter Entities’ activities include, among other things, executing large block trades and taking long and short positions directly and indirectly, through derivative instruments or otherwise. The securities and instruments in which the Underwriter Entities take positions, or expect to take positions, include loans similar to the mortgage loans, securities and instruments similar to the offered certificates and other securities and instruments. Market making is an activity where the Underwriter Entities buy and sell on behalf of customers, or for their own account, to satisfy the expected demand of customers. By its nature, market making involves facilitating transactions among market participants that have differing views of securities and instruments. Any short positions taken by the Underwriter Entities and/or their clients through marketing or otherwise will increase in value if the related securities or other instruments decrease in value, while positions taken by the Underwriter Entities and/or their clients in credit derivative or other derivative transactions with other parties, pursuant to which the Underwriter Entities and/or their clients sell or buy credit protection with respect to one or more classes of the offered certificates, may increase in value if the offered certificates default, are expected to default, or decrease in value. The Underwriter Entities and their clients acting through them may execute such transactions, modify or terminate such derivative positions and otherwise act with respect to such transactions, and may exercise or enforce, or refrain from exercising or enforcing, any or all of their rights and powers in connection therewith, without regard to whether any such action might have an adverse effect on the offered certificates or the certificateholders. Additionally, none of the Underwriter Entities will have any obligation to disclose any of these securities or derivatives transactions to you in your capacity as a certificateholder. As a result, you should expect that the Underwriter Entities will take positions that are inconsistent with, or adverse to, the investment objectives of investors in the offered certificates.

As a result of the Underwriter Entities’ various financial market activities, including acting as a research provider, investment advisor, market maker or principal investor, you should expect that personnel in various businesses throughout the Underwriter Entities will have and express research or investment views and make recommendations that are inconsistent with, or adverse to, the objectives of investors in the offered certificates.

If an Underwriter Entity becomes a holder of any of the certificates, through market-making activity or otherwise, any actions that it takes in its capacity as a certificateholder, including voting, providing consents or otherwise will not necessarily be aligned with the interests of other holders of the same class or other classes of the certificates. To the extent an Underwriter Entity makes a market in the certificates (which it is under no obligation to do), it would expect to receive income from the spreads between its bid and offer prices for the certificates. The price at which an Underwriter Entity may be willing to purchase certificates, if it makes a market, will depend on market conditions and other relevant factors and may be significantly lower than the issue price for the certificates and significantly lower than the price at which it may be willing to sell certificates.

In addition, none of the Underwriter Entities will have any obligation to monitor the performance of the certificates or the actions of the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator, the operating advisor or the trustee and will have no authority to advise the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator, the operating advisor or the trustee or to direct their actions.

Furthermore, each Underwriter Entity expects that a completed offering will enhance its ability to assist clients and counterparties in the transaction or in related transactions (including assisting clients in additional purchases and sales of the certificates and hedging transactions). The Underwriter Entities expect to derive fees and other revenues from these transactions. In addition, participating in a successful offering and providing related services to clients may enhance the Underwriter Entities’ relationships with various parties, facilitate additional business development, and enable them to obtain additional business and generate additional revenue.

The Underwriter Entities are playing several roles in this transaction. Citigroup Global Markets Inc., one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., the depositor, Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp., a sponsor, an originator, and the current holder of the Illinois Center pari passu companion loans, and Citibank, N.A., the certificate administrator, certificate registrar and paying agent. In addition, Goldman, Sachs & Co., one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, a sponsor, an originator, and the current holder of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio pari passu companion loans, and GS Commercial Real Estate LP, an originator.

See “Transaction Parties—Certain Affiliations and Certain Relationships” in this prospectus supplement and “Plan of Distribution (Underwriter Conflicts of Interest)” in this prospectus supplement for a description of certain

S-97

affiliations and relationships between the underwriters and other participants in this offering. Each of those affiliations and foregoing relationships should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any certificates.

Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, any Outside Servicer and any Outside Special Servicer

The pooling and servicing agreement provides that the mortgage loans serviced thereunder are required to be administered in accordance with the servicing standard without regard to ownership of any certificate by the master servicer or the special servicer or any of their respective affiliates. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement. Each outside servicing agreement provides that the related outside serviced loan combination is required to be administered in accordance with a servicing standard set forth therein. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the master servicer, the special servicer or any of their respective sub-servicers and, as it relates to servicing and administration of any outside serviced loan combination, any outside servicer, any outside special servicer, or any of their respective sub-servicers, may have interests when dealing with the mortgage loans that are in conflict with those of holders of the certificates, especially if:

· as it relates to the servicing and administration of mortgage loans under the pooling and servicing agreement, the master servicer, the special servicer, a sub-servicer or any of their respective affiliates holds certificates of this securitization transaction or any commercial mortgage-backed securities that evidence an interest in or are secured by the assets of an issuing entity, which assets include a serviced companion loan (or a portion of or interest in a serviced companion loan) (such securities, “serviced companion loan securities”); or

· as it relates to servicing and administration of any outside serviced loan combination under the related outside servicing agreement, any related outside servicer, any related outside special servicer, a sub-servicer or any of their respective affiliates, holds certificates of this securitization transaction or any securitization involving a companion loan in such outside serviced loan combination;

or, in any case, any of the foregoing parties or any of their respective affiliates has financial interests in or financial dealings with an applicable borrower, any of its affiliates or a sponsor. Each of these relationships may create a conflict of interest. For example, if the special servicer or its affiliate holds a subordinate class of certificates or serviced companion loan securities, the special servicer might seek to reduce the potential for losses allocable to those certificates or serviced companion loan securities from the applicable specially serviced loans by deferring acceleration in hope of maximizing future proceeds. However, that action could result in less proceeds to the issuing entity than would be realized if earlier action had been taken. Furthermore, none of the master servicer, the special servicer or a sub-servicer is required to act in a manner more favorable to the holders of offered certificates or any particular class of offered certificates than to the holders of Series 2015-GC33 non-offered certificates, any serviced companion loan holder or the holder of any serviced companion loan securities.

Each of the master servicer and the special servicer services and is expected to continue to service, in the ordinary course of its business, existing and new mortgage loans for third parties, or itself or its affiliates, including portfolios of mortgage loans similar to the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity. The real properties securing these other mortgage loans may be in the same markets as, and compete with, or have owners, obligors or property managers in common with, certain of the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans that will be included in the issuing entity. As a result of the services described above, the interests of each of the master servicer and the special servicer and each of its affiliates and their clients may differ from, and conflict with, the interests of the issuing entity. Consequently, personnel of the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, may perform services, on behalf of the issuing entity, with respect to the mortgage loans at the same time as they are performing services, on behalf of other persons, with respect to other mortgage loans secured by properties that compete with the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity. This may pose inherent conflicts for the master servicer or the special servicer.

The special servicer may enter into one or more arrangements with the controlling class representative, a directing holder, a controlling class certificateholder or other certificateholders or a companion loan holder (or an affiliate or a third-party representative of one or more of the preceding) to provide for a discount and/or revenue

S-98

sharing with respect to certain of the special servicer compensation in consideration of, among other things, the special servicer’s appointment (or continuance) as special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement and/or the co-lender agreements and limitations on the right of such person to replace the special servicer. The master servicer may enter into an agreement with a sponsor to purchase the servicing rights to the related mortgage loans and/or the right to be appointed as the master servicer with respect to such mortgage loans. Any person that enters into such an economic arrangement with the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, may be influenced by such economic arrangement when deciding whether to appoint such master servicer or whether to appoint or replace such special servicer from time to time, and such consideration would not be required to take into account the best interests of the certificateholders or any group of certificateholders. See “—Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment” below.

Further, the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator, the trustee and their respective affiliates are acting in multiple capacities in or related to this transaction, which may include, without limitation, participating in interim servicing and/or custodial arrangements with certain transaction parties, providing warehouse financing to certain originators or sponsors prior to transfer of their related mortgage loans to the issuing entity, and/or conducting due diligence on behalf of an investor with respect to the underlying mortgage loans prior to their transfer to the issuing entity. For a description of certain of the foregoing relationships and arrangements, see “Transaction Parties—Certain Affiliations and Certain Relationships” in this prospectus supplement. Also see “—Interests and Incentives of the Underwriter Entities May Not Be Aligned with Your Interests” above and “—Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Selection of the Underlying Mortgage Loans” and “—Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment” below.

Similarly, with respect to the outside serviced mortgage loans, conflicts described above may arise with respect to an outside servicer, an outside special servicer, a sub-servicer, or any of their respective affiliates.

Each of the foregoing relationships should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any certificates.

Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Operating Advisor

Situs Holdings, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of Delaware, has been appointed as the initial operating advisor. See “Transaction Parties—The Operating Advisor” in this prospectus supplement. After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the operating advisor will be required to consult on a non-binding basis with the special servicer with respect to certain actions of the special servicer in respect of the applicable serviced mortgage loan(s) and/or companion loan(s). In acting as operating advisor, the operating advisor is required to act solely on behalf of the issuing entity, in the best interest of, and for the benefit of, the certificateholders (as a collective whole as if such certificateholders (and, if applicable, any related serviced pari passu companion loan holder) constituted a single lender) and will have no fiduciary duty to any party. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Operating Advisor” in this prospectus supplement.

In the normal course of conducting its business, Situs Holdings, LLC and its affiliates have rendered services to, performed surveillance of, and negotiated with, numerous parties engaged in activities related to structured finance and commercial mortgage securitization. These parties may have included institutional investors, the depositor, the sponsors, the mortgage loan sellers, the originators, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the master servicer, the special servicer, a directing holder, a companion loan holder, the controlling class representative or collateral property owners or affiliates of any of those parties. These relationships may continue in the future. Each of these relationships, to the extent they exist, may involve a conflict of interest with respect to Situs Holdings, LLC’s duties as operating advisor. We cannot assure you that the existence of these relationships and other relationships in the future will not impact the manner in which Situs Holdings, LLC performs its duties under the pooling and servicing agreement. Situs Holdings, LLC assisted Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC, KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC and RAIT Funding, LLC with the preparation of certain due diligence materials for certain mortgage loans contributed by each such sponsor to the mortgage pool.

In addition, Situs Holdings, LLC and its affiliates may in the future, perform contract underwriting services and advisory services, as well as service or specially service, in the ordinary course of their business, existing and new commercial and multifamily mortgage loans for third parties, or itself or its affiliates, including portfolios of mortgage loans similar to the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity. The real properties securing these other mortgage loans may be in the same markets as, and compete with, or have owners, obligors or property managers in common with, certain of the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans that will be included

S-99

in the issuing entity. As a result of the duties described above, the interests of Situs Holdings, LLC and its affiliates and their clients may differ from, and conflict with, the interests of the issuing entity. Consequently, personnel of Situs Holdings, LLC may perform services on behalf of the issuing entity with respect to the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity, at the same time as they are performing services on behalf of other persons with respect to other mortgage loans secured by properties that may compete with the mortgaged properties securing the mortgage loans included in the issuing entity. This may pose inherent conflicts of interest for Situs Holdings, LLC. Although the operating advisor is required to consider the servicing standard in connection with its activities under the pooling and servicing agreement, the operating advisor will not itself be bound by the servicing standard.

In addition, the operating advisor and its affiliates may have interests that are in conflict with those of certificateholders if the operating advisor or any of its affiliates holds certificates, or has financial interests in or financial dealings with a borrower or a parent of a borrower. Each of these relationships may also create a conflict of interest.

Potential Conflicts of Interest of a Directing Holder, any Outside Controlling Class Representative and any Companion Loan Holder

It is expected that LNR Securities Holdings, LLC (an affiliate of LNR Partners, LLC) or an affiliate thereof will be the initial controlling class representative and the initial directing holder with respect to all of the mortgage loans and loan combinations serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement (other than any serviced outside controlled loan combination).

The controlling class representative will be controlled by the controlling class certificateholders, and the holders of the controlling class will have no duty or liability to any other certificateholder. Likewise, no holder of a serviced companion loan or any representative thereof will have any duty or liability to any certificateholder. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Directing Holder” in this prospectus supplement. Any directing holder may have interests in conflict with those of some or all of the certificateholders. As a result, it is possible that such directing holder (for so long as it is permitted to do so (e.g., in the case of the controlling class representative, for so long as a Control Termination Event does not exist)) may direct the special servicer to take actions that conflict with the interests of holders of certain classes of the certificates. Accordingly, the special servicer may, based on such direction, take actions with respect to the applicable specially serviced mortgage loan(s) for which the special servicer is responsible that could adversely affect the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates. However, the special servicer is not permitted to take actions that are prohibited by law or violate the servicing standard or the terms of the mortgage loan documents. In addition, except as limited by certain conditions described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination of the Special Servicer” in this prospectus supplement, unless a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the special servicer may be removed and replaced by the controlling class representative (other than with respect to any serviced outside controlled loan combination or any excluded mortgage loan) (a) for cause at any time and (b) without cause if either (i) LNR Partners, LLC or an affiliate thereof is no longer the special servicer or (ii) LNR Securities Holdings, LLC or an affiliate thereof owns less than 15% of the certificate principal amount of the then controlling class of certificates, in each case, upon satisfaction of certain conditions specified in the pooling and servicing agreement. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Directing Holder” and “—Termination of the Special Servicer” in this prospectus supplement.

None of the serviced subordinate companion loan holder(s), any serviced subordinate companion loan holder’s representatives, any holder of a serviced outside controlled companion loan, or any representatives of a holder of a serviced outside controlled companion will be a party to the pooling and servicing agreement, but one or more of such parties will be a third party beneficiary thereof and their rights may affect the servicing of the related mortgage loan.

Similarly, the related outside controlling class representative has, with respect to an outside serviced loan combination, certain consent and consultation rights and rights to replace the related outside special servicer under the related outside servicing agreement, and (so long as a Consultation Termination Event does not exist) the controlling class representative for this securitization transaction will have certain consultation rights with respect to such outside serviced loan combination.

Any or all of the controlling class representative for this securitization transaction, an outside controlling class representative, and the outside controlling note holder of a serviced outside controlled loan combination may have

S-100

interests that are in conflict with those of any or all of the Series 2015-GC33 certificateholders, especially if the applicable party or any affiliate thereof holds certificates, or has financial interests in or other financial dealings (as lender or otherwise) with a borrower or a parent of a borrower. Each of these relationships may create a conflict of interest.

The special servicer, at the direction of or upon consultation with, as applicable, a serviced pari passu companion loan holder (or its representative), may take actions with respect to a serviced pari passu loan combination that could adversely affect the holders of some or all of the classes of the certificates, to the extent described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” in this prospectus supplement. A serviced pari passu companion loan holder (or its representative) does not have any duty to the holders of any class of certificates and may have interests in conflict with those of the certificateholders. As a result, it is possible that a serviced pari passu companion loan holder (or its representative) may advise (or, if it is the outside controlling note holder of a serviced outside controlled loan combination, may direct) the special servicer to take actions that conflict with the interests of holders of certain classes of the certificates.

No certificateholder may take any action against the controlling class representative for this securitization transaction, any outside controlling class representative or any serviced companion loan holder (or its representative) for having acted solely in its own interests. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations”, “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Directing Holder” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination of the Special Servicer” in this prospectus supplement.

Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Selection of the Underlying Mortgage Loans

The anticipated initial investors in the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates (the “B-Piece Buyers”) were given the opportunity by the sponsors to perform due diligence on the mortgage loans originally identified by the sponsors for inclusion in the issuing entity, and to request the removal, re-sizing or change in other features of some or all of the mortgage loans. The B-Piece Buyers may have adjusted the mortgage pool as originally proposed by the sponsors by removing or otherwise excluding certain proposed mortgage loans. In addition, the B-Piece Buyers received or may receive price adjustments or cost mitigation arrangements in connection with accepting certain mortgage loans in the mortgage pool.

We cannot assure you that you or another investor would have made the same requests to modify the original pool as the B-Piece Buyers or that the final pool as influenced by the B-Piece Buyers’ feedback will not adversely affect the performance of your certificates and benefit the performance of the B-Piece Buyers’ certificates. Because of the differing subordination levels, the B-Piece Buyers have interests that may, in some circumstances, differ from those of purchasers of other classes of certificates, and may desire a portfolio composition that benefits the B-Piece Buyers but that does not benefit other investors. In addition, the B-Piece Buyers may enter into hedging or other transactions or otherwise have business objectives that also could cause their interests with respect to the mortgage pool to diverge from those of other purchasers of the certificates. The B-Piece Buyers performed due diligence solely for their own benefit and have no liability to any person or entity for conducting their due diligence. The B-Piece Buyers are not required to take into account the interests of any other investor in the certificates in exercising remedies or voting or other rights in their capacity as owner of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates or in making requests or recommendations to the sponsors as to the selection of the mortgage loans and the establishment of other transaction terms. Investors are not entitled to rely on in any way the B-Piece Buyers’ acceptance of a mortgage loan. The B-Piece Buyers’ acceptance of a mortgage loan does not constitute, and may not be construed as, an endorsement of such mortgage loan, the underwriting for such mortgage loan or the originator of such mortgage loan.

The B-Piece Buyers will have no liability to any certificateholder for any actions taken by them as described in the preceding two paragraphs.

It is expected that LNR Securities Holdings, LLC, or an affiliate thereof, will be one of the B-Piece Buyers and will also be the initial controlling class representative and, accordingly, the initial directing holder with respect to the serviced mortgage loans and serviced companion loans other than any serviced outside controlled loan combination and any excluded mortgage loan. The controlling class representative will have certain rights to direct and consult with the special servicer with respect to the applicable serviced loans. In addition, the controlling class representative will generally have certain consultation rights with regard to some or all of the outside serviced mortgage loans under each related co-lender agreement. See “—Potential Conflicts of Interest of a Directing Holder, any Outside Controlling Class Representative and any Companion Loan Holder” above.

S-101

Because the incentives and actions of the B-Piece Buyers may, in some circumstances, differ from or be adverse to those of purchasers of the offered certificates, you are advised and encouraged to make your own investment decision based on a careful review of the information set forth in this prospectus supplement and your own view of the mortgage pool.

Conflicts of Interest May Occur as a Result of the Rights of the Controlling Class Representative, an Outside Controlling Class Representative or a Controlling Note Holder to Terminate the Special Servicer of the Related Loan Combination

With respect to each loan combination, the controlling class representative, an outside controlling class representative or the outside controlling note holder of a serviced outside controlled loan combination, as applicable, will be entitled, under certain circumstances, to remove the special servicer for such loan combination and, in such circumstances, appoint a successor special servicer for such loan combination (or have certain consent rights with respect to such removal or replacement).

The party with this appointment power may have special relationships or interests that conflict with those of the holders of one or more classes of certificates. In addition, that party does not have any duties to the holders of any class of certificates, may act solely in its own interests, and will have no liability to any certificateholders for having done so. No certificateholder may take any action against the controlling class representative, an outside controlling class representative, or the outside controlling note holder of a serviced outside controlled companion loan, as applicable (under the pooling and servicing agreement for this securitization or any other servicing agreement), or against any other parties for having acted solely in their own respective interests. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” in this prospectus supplement for a description of these rights to terminate a special servicer.

Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment

A special servicer (whether the initial special servicer or a successor) may enter into one or more arrangements with the controlling class representative, a controlling class certificateholder, a companion loan holder, a holder of a security backed, in whole or in part, by a companion loan, or any other certificateholders (or an affiliate or a third-party representative of one or more of the preceding) to provide for a discount and/or revenue sharing with respect to certain of the special servicer compensation in consideration of, among other things, the appointment (or continuance) of such special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement and, with respect to any serviced loan combinations, the related co-lender agreement and limitations on the right of such person to replace the special servicer.

Each of the foregoing relationships should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any certificates.

The managers of the mortgaged properties and the borrowers may experience conflicts of interest in the management and/or ownership of the mortgaged properties because:

· a substantial number of the mortgaged properties are managed by property managers affiliated with the respective borrowers;

· these property managers also may manage and/or franchise additional properties, including properties that may compete with the mortgaged properties; and

· affiliates of the managers and/or the borrowers, or the managers and/or the borrowers themselves, also may own other properties, including competing properties.

None of the borrowers, property managers or any of their affiliates or any employees of the foregoing has any duty to favor the leasing of space in the mortgaged properties over the leasing of space in other properties, one or more of which may be adjacent to or near the mortgaged properties.

Each of the foregoing relationships should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any certificates.

S-102

Your Lack of Control Over the Issuing Entity and Servicing of the Mortgage Loans Can Create Risks

Except as described below, you and other certificateholders generally do not have a right to vote and do not have the right to make decisions with respect to the administration of the issuing entity. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—General” in this prospectus supplement.

Those decisions are generally made, subject to the express terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, by the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee or the certificate administrator, as applicable. Any decision made by one of those parties in respect of the issuing entity, even if that decision is determined to be in your best interests by that party, may be contrary to the decision that you or other certificateholders would have made and may negatively affect your interests.

Except as limited by certain conditions described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination of the Special Servicer” in this prospectus supplement, the special servicer (but not any outside special servicer for any outside serviced loan combination) may be removed with respect to the serviced mortgage loans and serviced companion loans (but excluding any excluded mortgage loan) by the controlling class representative (so long as no Control Termination Event exists) (x) for cause at any time and (y) without cause if either (i) LNR Partners, LLC or an affiliate thereof is no longer the special servicer or (ii) LNR Securities Holdings, LLC or an affiliate thereof owns less than 15% of the certificate principal amount of the then controlling class of certificates, in each case, upon satisfaction of certain conditions specified in the pooling and servicing agreement and, in the case of any loan combination, the related co-lender agreement. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Directing Holder” and “—Termination of the Special Servicer” in this prospectus supplement.

After the occurrence and during continuance of a Control Termination Event, the holders of at least 25% of the voting rights of the certificates (other than the Class R certificates) may request a vote to replace the special servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement (except with respect to a serviced outside controlled loan combination). The subsequent vote may result in the termination and replacement of the special servicer if (within 180 days of the initial request for that vote) the holders of (a) at least 75% of the voting rights of the certificates (other than the Class R certificates), or (b) more than 50% of the voting rights of each class of certificates other than the Class X-A, Class X-D and Class R certificates (but, for purposes of this clause (b), considering only those classes of certificates that have, in each such case, an outstanding certificate principal amount, as notionally reduced by any appraisal reduction amounts then allocable to the subject class of certificates, equal to or greater than 25% of an amount equal to (i) the initial certificate principal amount of such class of certificates minus (ii) payments of principal previously made with respect to such class of certificates, and considering each class of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates together with the Class PEZ certificates’ applicable percentage interest of the related Class A-S, Class B or Class C trust component as a single “Class” for such purpose) vote affirmatively to so terminate and replace. In addition, after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, the operating advisor may recommend the replacement of the special servicer (with respect to the applicable mortgage loan(s) and companion loan(s) serviced under the pooling and servicing agreement); provided that the operating advisor may not recommend the removal of the special servicer with respect to a serviced outside controlled loan combination without the consent of the related controlling note holder. That recommendation may result in the termination and replacement of the special servicer (with respect to the applicable mortgage loan(s) and companion loan(s)) if (within 180 days of the initial request for a vote) the holders of more than 50% of the voting rights of each class of certificates other than the Class X-A, Class X-D and Class R certificates (but considering only those classes of certificates that have, in each such case, an outstanding certificate principal amount, as notionally reduced by any appraisal reduction amounts then allocable to the subject class of certificates, equal to or greater than 25% of an amount equal to (i) the initial certificate principal amount of such class of certificates minus (ii) payments of principal previously made with respect to such class of certificates, and considering each class of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates together with the Class PEZ certificates’ applicable percentage interest of the related Class A-S, Class B or Class C trust component as a single “Class” for such purpose) vote affirmatively to so terminate and replace. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations”, “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination of the Special Servicer” and “—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.

The outside special servicer for any outside serviced loan combination will be subject to removal and replacement by the related outside controlling class representative or in connection with a securityholder vote generally in a manner similar to that contemplated by the preceding two paragraphs, in each case subject to certain conditions provided in the related outside servicing agreement and the related co-lender agreement.

S-103

In addition, a directing holder will have certain consent and/or consultation rights with respect to the applicable mortgage loan(s) and companion loan(s) under the pooling and servicing agreement under certain circumstances, as described in this prospectus supplement; provided, however, that a directing holder may lose any such rights upon the occurrence of certain events. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Directing Holder” in this prospectus supplement. Similarly, any outside controlling class representative may have certain consent and consultation rights with respect to the related outside serviced loan combination under the outside servicing agreement and the related co-lender agreement, which (in the case of an outside controlling class representative) it may lose upon the occurrence of certain events specified in the outside servicing agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” in this prospectus supplement.

In addition, if any mortgage loan becomes an “excluded controlling class mortgage loan” (i.e., a mortgage loan or loan combination with respect to which the controlling class representative or any controlling class certificateholder is a borrower party), the controlling class representative or any controlling class certificateholder that is a borrower party (each, as applicable, an “excluded controlling class holder”) will not be entitled to have access to any related “excluded information”, including any asset status reports, final asset status reports or any summaries related thereto (and any other information identified in the pooling and servicing agreement), with respect to such excluded controlling class mortgage loan. Although the pooling and servicing agreement will require (i) each excluded controlling class holder to certify that it acknowledges and agrees that it is prohibited from accessing and reviewing (and it agrees not to access and review) any related excluded information and (ii) the controlling class representative or any controlling class certificateholder that is not an excluded controlling class holder to certify and agree that they will not share any such excluded information with any excluded controlling class holder, we cannot assure you that such excluded controlling class holders will not access, obtain, review and/or use, or the controlling class representative or any controlling class certificateholder that is not an excluded controlling class holder will not share with such excluded controlling class holder, such related excluded information in a manner that adversely impacts your certificates.

In addition, while there is an operating advisor with certain obligations in respect of reviewing the compliance of the special servicer with certain of its obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement, the operating advisor (i) has no control rights over actions by the special servicer at any time, (ii) has no ability to communicate with, or directly influence the actions of, the borrowers at any time, (iii) has no consultation rights over actions by the special servicer prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event and (iv) has no consultation rights in connection with the outside serviced loan combinations, and the special servicer is under no obligation at any time to act upon any of the operating advisor’s recommendations. In addition, the operating advisor only has the limited obligations and duties set forth in the pooling and servicing agreement, and has no fiduciary duty, has no other duty except with respect to its specific obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement and has no duty or liability to any particular class of certificates or any certificateholder. It is not intended that the operating advisor act as a surrogate for the certificateholders. Investors should not rely on the operating advisor to monitor the actions of any directing holder or special servicer, other than to the limited extent specifically required in respect of certain actions of the special servicer at certain prescribed times under the pooling and servicing agreement, or to affect the special servicer’s actions under the pooling and servicing agreement.

In certain limited circumstances, certificateholders have the right to vote on matters affecting the issuing entity. In some cases these votes are by certificateholders taken as a whole and in others the vote is by class. In all cases voting is based on the outstanding certificate principal amount (or outstanding notional amount, as applicable), which is reduced (or indirectly reduced in the case of a notional amount) by realized losses. In certain cases with respect to the termination of the special servicer and the operating advisor, certain voting rights will also be reduced by appraisal reduction amounts. These limitations on voting could adversely affect your ability to protect your interests with respect to matters voted on by certificateholders. You have no rights to vote on any servicing matters related to any outside serviced loan combination. See “Description of the Offered Certificates—Voting Rights” in this prospectus supplement.

Rights of the Directing Holder and the Operating Advisor Could Adversely Affect Your Investment

In connection with the taking of certain actions that would be a major decision in connection with the servicing of a specially serviced mortgage loan or, if applicable, loan combination under the pooling and servicing agreement (and, in the case of the controlling class representative, for so long as a Control Termination Event does not exist), the special servicer generally will be required to obtain the consent of the related directing holder. After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the special servicer generally will

S-104

be required to consult with the controlling class representative (until the occurrence and during the continuance of a Consultation Termination Event) and the operating advisor; provided that such consultation will occur with respect to a serviced outside controlled loan combination if and to the extent that the holder of the related split mortgage loan is granted consultation rights under the related co-lender agreement. These actions and decisions include, among others, certain loan modifications, including modifications of monetary terms, foreclosure or comparable conversion of the related mortgaged property or properties, and certain sales of the mortgage loan(s) or, if applicable, loan combination(s), or any related REO property or properties for less than the outstanding principal amount plus accrued interest, fees and expenses. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Directing Holder” in this prospectus supplement for a list of actions and decisions requiring consultation with the operating advisor and/or the controlling class representative following the occurrence of a Control Termination Event. As a result of these obligations, the special servicer may take actions with respect to a serviced mortgage loan that could adversely affect the interests of investors in one or more classes of offered certificates.

You will be acknowledging and agreeing, by your purchase of offered certificates, that any directing holder: (i) may have special relationships and interests that conflict with those of holders of one or more classes of certificates; (ii) may act solely in its own interests (or, in the case of the controlling class representative, in the interests of the holders of the controlling class); (iii) does not have any duties to the holders of any class of certificates (other than, in the case of the controlling class representative, the controlling class); (iv) may take actions that favor its own interests (or, in the case of the controlling class representative, the interests of the holders of the controlling class) over the interests of the holders of one or more classes of certificates; and (v) will have no liability whatsoever (other than, in the case of the controlling class representative, to the related controlling class certificateholder(s)) for having so acted as set forth in (i) – (iv) above, and that no certificateholder may take any action whatsoever against any directing holder or any affiliate, director, officer, employee, shareholder, member, partner, agent or principal of any directing holder for having so acted.

Loan Combinations Pose Special Risks

Realization on a Mortgage Loan That Is Part of a Serviced Loan Combination May Be Adversely Affected by the Rights of the Related Serviced Companion Loan Holder

If a serviced pari passu loan combination were to become defaulted, the related co-lender agreement requires the special servicer, in the event it determines to sell the related mortgage loan in accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, to sell the related serviced pari passu companion loan(s) together with such defaulted mortgage loan. We cannot assure you that such a required sale of a defaulted loan combination (or applicable portion thereof) would not adversely affect the ability of the special servicer to sell such mortgage loan, or the price realized for such mortgage loan, following a default on the related serviced pari passu loan combination. Further, given that, pursuant to the co-lender agreement for any such serviced pari passu loan combination (other than any such loan combination that is a serviced outside controlled loan combination), the serviced pari passu companion loan holder is not the directing holder, and the issuing entity as holder of the related mortgage loan is the directing holder (with the right to consent to material servicing decisions and replace the special servicer, subject to the conditions specified under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Directing Holder” and “—Termination of the Special Servicer” in this prospectus supplement), with respect to any such serviced pari passu loan combination, the related serviced pari passu companion loan may not be as marketable as the related mortgage loan held by the issuing entity. Accordingly, if any such sale does occur with respect to the serviced pari passu loan combination, then the net proceeds realized by the certificateholders in connection with such sale may be less than would be the case if only the related mortgage loan were subject to such sale.

In the case of a serviced outside controlled loan combination, a related companion loan holder or its representative will generally have the right to consent to certain servicing actions with respect to such loan combination by the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable (and, in certain cases, direct the special servicer to take certain servicing actions with respect to such loan combination). In addition, for so long as a Consultation Termination Event does not exist, the controlling class representative will have non-binding consultation rights with respect to certain servicing decisions involving any serviced outside controlled loan combination.

In connection with the servicing of a serviced pari passu loan combination, the related serviced pari passu companion loan holder or its representative (if it is not otherwise exercising the rights of directing holder) will be entitled to consult with the special servicer regarding material servicing actions, including making recommendations as to alternative actions to be taken by the special servicer with respect to such serviced pari

S-105

passu loan combination, and such recommended servicing actions could adversely affect the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates. The serviced pari passu companion loan holder and its representative may have interests in conflict with those of the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates, and it is possible that the serviced pari passu companion loan holder or its representative may advise the special servicer to take actions that conflict with the interests of the holders of certain classes of the certificates. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any such consultation with the serviced pari passu companion loan holder or its representative is non-binding, and in no event is the special servicer obligated at any time to follow or take any alternative actions recommended by such serviced pari passu companion loan holder (or its representative).

With respect to any serviced AB loan combination, pursuant to the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, if such serviced AB loan combination becomes a defaulted mortgage loan, and if the special servicer determines to sell the related serviced mortgage loan, then such sale will be subject to (and the proceeds derived therefrom may be affected by) the right of the subordinate companion loan holder to purchase and cure defaults under the related defaulted mortgage loan (together with any related serviced pari passu companion loans, if any) as and to the extent described in “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” in this prospectus supplement.

With respect to any serviced AB loan combination, the holder of the related subordinate companion loan will initially have the right to consent to certain servicing actions by the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable (and, in certain cases, direct the special servicer to take certain servicing actions with respect to such serviced AB loan combination).

You will be acknowledging and agreeing, by your purchase of offered certificates, that, with respect to any mortgage loan that is part of a serviced loan combination, the related serviced companion loan holder:

· may have special relationships and interests that conflict with those of holders of one or more classes of certificates;

· may act solely in its own interests, without regard to your interests;

· does not have any duties to any other person, including the holders of any class of certificates;

· may take actions that favor its interests over the interests of the holders of one or more classes of certificates; and

· will have no liability whatsoever for having so acted and that no certificateholder may take any action whatsoever against the serviced companion loan holder or any director, officer, employee, agent, representative or principal of the serviced companion loan holder for having so acted.

Rights of any Outside Controlling Class Representative Under any Outside Servicing Agreement Could Adversely Affect Your Investment

With respect to each outside serviced loan combination, the related outside controlling class representative will have rights comparable to those of the controlling class representative for this securitization transaction, and accordingly, prospective investors should consider the following:

· An outside controlling class representative may have interests in conflict with those of the holders of some or all of the classes of certificates.

· With respect to any outside serviced loan combination, although the outside special servicer is not permitted to take actions which are prohibited by law or violate the servicing standard under the related outside servicing agreement or the terms of the related mortgage loan documents, it is possible that the related outside controlling class representative may direct the outside special servicer to take actions with respect to the outside serviced loan combination that conflict with the interests of the holders of certain classes of the certificates.

S-106

You will be acknowledging and agreeing, by your purchase of offered certificates, that, with respect to any outside serviced mortgage loan, the related outside controlling class representative:

· may have special relationships and interests that conflict with those of holders of one or more classes of certificates;

· may act solely in its own interests, without regard to your interests;

· does not have any duties to any other person, including the holders of any class of certificates;

· may take actions that favor its interests over the interests of the holders of one or more classes of certificates; and

· will have no liability whatsoever for having so acted and that no certificateholder may take any action whatsoever against such outside controlling class representative (or other controlling note holder) or any director, officer, employee, agent or principal of such outside controlling class representative (or other controlling note holder) for having so acted.

You Will Not Have Any Control Over the Servicing of Any Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan

Each outside serviced mortgage loan is secured by one or more mortgaged properties that also secure a companion loan that is not an asset of the issuing entity and is being serviced under an outside servicing agreement, which is the pooling and servicing agreement governing the securitization of such companion loan, by the outside servicer and outside special servicer, and in accordance with the servicing standard provided for in the outside servicing agreement. Further, pursuant to the related co-lender agreement and the outside servicing agreement, the related outside controlling class representative (and not any party to our securitization transaction) has certain rights to direct and advise the outside special servicer with respect to such outside serviced loan combination (including the related outside serviced mortgage loan). As a result, you will have less control over the servicing of the outside serviced mortgage loans than you would if the outside serviced mortgage loans are being serviced by the master servicer and the special server under the pooling and servicing agreement for your certificates.

See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.

There are no serviced outside controlled loan combinations, subordinate companion loans or AB loan combinations related to this securitization transaction and, therefore, all references in this prospectus supplement to “serviced outside controlled loan combinations”, “subordinate companion loans”, “AB loan combinations” or any related terms should be disregarded.

Sponsors May Not Be Able to Make Required Repurchases or Substitutions of Defective Mortgage Loans

Each sponsor is the sole warranting party in respect of the mortgage loans sold by such sponsor to us. However, KGS Holdings, L.P. will guarantee KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC’s repurchase and substitution obligations under the related mortgage loan purchase agreement, and RAIT Financial Trust will guarantee RAIT Funding, LLC’s repurchase and substitution obligations under the related mortgage loan purchase agreement, as described in “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions” in this prospectus supplement. Neither we nor any of our affiliates (except Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. in its capacity as a sponsor) are obligated to repurchase or substitute any mortgage loan in connection with either a breach of any sponsor’s representations and warranties or any document defects, if such sponsor defaults on its obligation to do so. We cannot assure you that the sponsors (or, in the case of KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC or RAIT Funding, LLC, the applicable guarantor) will have the financial ability to effect such repurchases or substitutions. In addition, the sponsors (or, in the case of KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC or RAIT Funding, LLC, the applicable guarantor) may have various legal defenses available to them in connection with a repurchase or substitution obligation, including that a claim for breach of representation or warranty is not made within the applicable statute of limitations. Any mortgage loan that is not repurchased or substituted and that is not a “qualified mortgage” for a REMIC may cause designated portions of the issuing entity to fail to qualify as one or more REMICs or cause the issuing entity to incur a tax. See “Description of the

S-107

Mortgage Pool—Representations and Warranties” and “—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions” in this prospectus supplement for a summary of certain representations and warranties.

Any Loss of Value Payment Made by a Sponsor May Prove to Be Insufficient to Cover All Losses on a Defective Mortgage Loan

In lieu of repurchasing or substituting a mortgage loan in connection with either a material breach of the related sponsor’s representations and warranties or any material document defects (other than a material breach or material document defect that is related to a mortgage loan not being a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3)), the related sponsor may make a payment to the trust to compensate it for the loss of value of the affected mortgage loan. Upon its making such payment, the sponsor will be deemed to have cured the related material breach or material defect in all respects. Although such “loss of value payment” may only be made to the extent that the special servicer, with the consent of the controlling class representative prior to the occurrence of a Control Termination Event, deems such amount to be sufficient to compensate the trust for the related material breach or material document defect, we cannot assure you that such payment will fully compensate the trust for such material breach or material document defect in all respects. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Representations and Warranties” and “—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions” in this prospectus supplement for a summary discussion of the loss of value payment.

Book-Entry Registration Will Mean You Will Not Be Recognized as a Holder of Record

Your certificates will be initially represented by one or more certificates registered in the name of Cede & Co., as the nominee for DTC, and will not be registered in your name. As a result, you will not be recognized as a certificateholder, or holder of record of your certificates. See “Description of the Offered Certificates—Delivery, Form, Transfer and Denomination—Book-Entry Registration” in this prospectus supplement and “Risk Factors—Problems with Book-Entry Registration” in the prospectus for a discussion of important considerations relating to not being a certificateholder of record.

Tax Matters and Changes in Tax Law May Adversely Impact the Mortgage Loans or Your Investment

Tax Considerations Relating to Foreclosure

If the issuing entity acquires a mortgaged property (or, in the case of an outside serviced mortgage loan, a beneficial interest in a mortgaged property) subsequent to a default on the related mortgage loan pursuant to a foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, the special servicer (or, in the case of an outside serviced mortgage loan, the related outside special servicer) would be required to retain an independent contractor to operate and manage such mortgaged property. Among other items, the independent contractor generally will not be able to perform construction work other than repair, maintenance or certain types of tenant build-outs, unless the construction was more than 10% completed when defaulted or the default of the mortgage loan becomes imminent. Any (i) net income from such operation (other than qualifying “rents from real property”) (ii) rental income based on the net profits of a tenant or sub-tenant or allocable to a service that is non-customary in the area and for the type of property involved and (iii) rental income attributable to personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property, if the rent attributable to the personal property exceeds 15% of the total rent for the taxable year, will subject the Lower-Tier REMIC to federal tax (and possibly state or local tax) on such income at the highest marginal corporate tax rate. No determination has been made whether any portion of the income from the mortgaged properties constitutes “rent from real property”. Any such imposition of tax will reduce the net proceeds available for distribution to certificateholders. The special servicer (or, in the case of an outside serviced mortgage loan, the related outside special servicer) may permit the Lower-Tier REMIC to earn “net income from foreclosure property” that is subject to tax if it determines that the net after-tax benefit to certificateholders and any related companion loan holders, as a collective whole, could reasonably be expected to be greater than under another method of operating or leasing the mortgaged property. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans—Standards for Conduct Generally in Effecting Foreclosure or the Sale of Defaulted Loans” in this prospectus supplement. In addition, if the issuing entity were to acquire one or more mortgaged properties (or, in the case of an outside serviced mortgage loan, a beneficial interest in a mortgaged property) pursuant to a foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, upon acquisition of those mortgaged properties (or, in the case of an outside serviced mortgage loan, a beneficial interest in a mortgaged property), the issuing entity may in certain jurisdictions, particularly in New York, be required to pay state or local transfer or excise taxes upon liquidation of such properties. Such state or local taxes may reduce net proceeds available for distribution to the certificateholders.

S-108

REMIC Status

If an entity intended to qualify as a REMIC fails to satisfy one or more of the REMIC provisions of the Code during any taxable year, the Code provides that such entity will not be treated as a REMIC for such year and any year thereafter. In such event, the issuing entity, including the Upper-Tier REMIC and the Lower-Tier REMIC, would likely be treated as one or more separate associations taxable as a corporation under Treasury regulations, and the offered certificates may be treated as stock interests in those associations and not as debt instruments. The Code authorizes the granting of relief from disqualification if failure to meet one or more of the requirements for REMIC status occurs inadvertently and steps are taken to correct the conditions that caused disqualification within a reasonable time after the discovery of the disqualifying event. The relief may be granted by either allowing continuation as a REMIC or by ignoring the cessation entirely. However, any such relief may be accompanied by sanctions, such as the imposition of a corporate tax on all or a portion of the REMIC’s income for the period of time during which the requirements for REMIC status are not satisfied. While the United States Department of the Treasury is authorized to issue regulations regarding the granting of relief from disqualification if the failure to meet one or more of the requirements of REMIC status occurs inadvertently and in good faith, no such regulations have been issued.

In addition, changes to REMIC restrictions on loan modifications may impact your investment in the offered certificates. See “Risk Factors—Changes to REMIC Restrictions on Loan Modifications May Impact an Investment in the Certificates” in the prospectus.

State and Other Tax Considerations

In addition to the federal income tax consequences described under the heading “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences” in the prospectus, potential purchasers should consider the state and local, and any other, tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of the offered certificates. State, local and other tax laws may differ substantially from the corresponding federal tax law, and this prospectus supplement does not purport to describe any aspects of the tax laws of the states or localities, or any other jurisdiction, in which the mortgaged properties are located or of any other applicable state or locality or other jurisdiction.

It is possible that one or more jurisdictions may attempt to tax nonresident holders of offered certificates solely by reason of the location in that jurisdiction of the depositor, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the sponsors, a related borrower or a mortgaged property or on some other basis, may require nonresident holders of certificates to file returns in such jurisdiction or may attempt to impose penalties for failure to file such returns; and it is possible that any such jurisdiction will ultimately succeed in collecting such taxes or penalties from nonresident holders of offered certificates. We cannot assure you that holders of offered certificates will not be subject to tax in any particular state, local or other taxing jurisdiction.

If any tax or penalty is successfully asserted by any state, local or other taxing jurisdiction, none of the depositor, the sponsors, the related borrower, the trustee, the certificate administrator, the operating advisor, the master servicer or the special servicer will be obligated to indemnify or otherwise to reimburse the holders of certificates for such tax or penalty.

You should consult with your own tax advisor with respect to the various state and local, and any other, tax consequences of an investment in the offered certificates.

Combination or “Layering” of Multiple Risks May Significantly Increase Risk of Loss

Although the various risks discussed in this prospectus supplement are generally described separately, you should consider the potential effects of the interplay of multiple risk factors. Where more than one significant risk factor is present, the risk of loss to an investor in the certificates may be significantly increased.

S-109

Description of the Mortgage Pool

General

The issuing entity with respect to the Certificates will be Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33 (the “Issuing Entity”). The assets of the Issuing Entity will consist of a pool (the “Mortgage Pool”) of 64 fixed rate mortgage loans (collectively (including, without limitation, any REO Mortgage Loan), the “Mortgage Loans”) with an aggregate principal balance as of their respective due dates in September 2015 (or, in the case of any Mortgage Loan that has its first due date in October 2015, the date that would have been its due date in September 2015 under the terms of that Mortgage Loan if a Monthly Payment were scheduled to be due in that month) (collectively, the “Cut-off Date”), after deducting payments of principal due on such respective dates, of approximately $958,489,233 (with respect to each Mortgage Loan, the “Cut-off Date Balance” and, in the aggregate, the “Initial Pool Balance”). Each Mortgage Loan is (i) evidenced by one or more promissory notes or similar evidence of indebtedness (each, a “Mortgage Note”) and (ii) secured by (or, in the case of an indemnity deed of trust, backed by a guaranty that is secured by) a mortgage, deed of trust or other similar security instrument (a “Mortgage”) creating a first lien on a fee simple and/or leasehold interest in an office, hospitality, retail, multifamily, self storage, mixed use or industrial property (each, a “Mortgaged Property”) (or, in certain cases, secured by multiple Mortgages encumbering a portfolio of Mortgaged Properties). The Mortgage Loans are generally non-recourse loans. In the event of a borrower default on a non-recourse Mortgage Loan, recourse may be had only against the specific Mortgaged Property and the other limited assets securing the Mortgage Loan, and not against the borrower’s other assets.

As described under “The Trust Fund—Mortgage Loans—Loan Combinations” in the accompanying prospectus and as described in greater detail below, certain of the Mortgage Loans (each such Mortgage Loan, a “Split Mortgage Loan”) may be part of a split loan structure (a “Loan Combination”). A Loan Combination consists of the particular Split Mortgage Loan to be included in the Issuing Entity and one or more “companion loans” (each, a “Companion Loan”) that will be held outside the Issuing Entity. If a Companion Loan is pari passu in right of payment to the related Split Mortgage Loan, it may be referred to in this prospectus supplement as a “Pari Passu Companion Loan” and the related Loan Combination may be referred to in this prospectus supplement as a “Pari Passu Loan Combination”. If a Companion Loan is subordinate in right of payment to the related Split Mortgage Loan, it may be referred to in this prospectus supplement as a “Subordinate Companion Loan” and the related Loan Combination may be referred to in this prospectus supplement as an “AB Loan Combination”. If a Loan Combination includes both a Pari Passu Companion Loan and a Subordinate Companion Loan, the discussion in this prospectus supplement regarding both Pari Passu Loan Combinations and AB Loan Combinations will be applicable to such Loan Combination. The subject Split Mortgage Loan and its related Companion Loan(s) comprising any particular Loan Combination are: (i) each evidenced by one or more separate promissory notes; (ii) obligations of the same borrower(s); (iii) cross-defaulted; and (iv) collectively secured by the same mortgage(s) and/or deed(s) of trust encumbering the related Mortgaged Property or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties. Only each Split Mortgage Loan is included in the Issuing Entity. No Companion Loan is an asset of the Issuing Entity.

If a Pari Passu Loan Combination is serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for this securitization transaction, then such Pari Passu Loan Combination may be referred to in this prospectus supplement as a “Serviced Loan Combination” or a “Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination” and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan may be referred to in this prospectus supplement as a “Serviced Companion Loan” or a “Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan”. If an AB Loan Combination is serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for this securitization transaction, then such AB Loan Combination may be referred to in this prospectus supplement as a “Serviced Loan Combination” or a “Serviced AB Loan Combination” and the related Subordinate Companion Loan may be referred to in this prospectus supplement as a “Serviced Companion Loan” or a “Serviced Subordinate Companion Loan”. The holder of each Companion Loan is referred to as a “Companion Loan Holder”, the holder of each Serviced Companion Loan is referred to as a “Serviced Companion Loan Holder”, the holder of each Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan is referred to as a “Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder” and the holder of each Serviced Subordinate Companion Loan is referred to as a “Serviced Subordinate Companion Loan Holder”.

If and for so long as the “controlling note” with respect to any Serviced Loan Combination (regardless of whether such note evidences a Pari Passu Companion Loan or a Subordinate Companion Loan) is not included in this securitization transaction, then such Serviced Loan Combination is referred to from time to time in this prospectus supplement as a “Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination”, the related Serviced Mortgage

S-110

Loan is referred to from time to time in this prospectus supplement as a “Serviced Outside Controlled Mortgage Loan” and the related Serviced Companion Loan is referred to from time to time in this prospectus supplement as a “Serviced Outside Controlled Companion Loan”. However, a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination may cease to be such if, by virtue of any trigger event contemplated by the related Co-Lender Agreement, the promissory note evidencing the related Split Mortgage Loan becomes the controlling note for such Loan Combination, in which case the discussion in this prospectus supplement regarding “Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combinations” will thereafter cease to apply to the subject Loan Combination. With respect to any Loan Combination that is, and only for so long as such Loan Combination is, a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination, the “Outside Controlling Note Holder” will at any time be the holder of the related controlling note (regardless of whether such note evidences a Pari Passu Companion Loan or a Subordinate Companion Loan) or such holder’s designated representative. If, with respect to any Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination, the related controlling note is included in a securitization trust, the pooling and servicing agreement, trust and servicing agreement or other comparable agreement for the relevant securitization will likely designate a particular party associated with that securitization, which may be, among others, a “controlling class representative” (or equivalent party), the majority holder of a particular class, a servicer or another service provider, to exercise the rights associated with the related controlling note, although the right of any such designated party to exercise some or all of such rights may terminate or shift to another designated party upon the occurrence of certain trigger events.

Each of four (4) Mortgage Loans, respectively secured by (i) the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Illinois Center (such Mortgage Loan, the “Illinois Center Mortgage Loan”), (ii) the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hammons Hotel Portfolio (such Mortgage Loan, the “Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan”), (iii) the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as The Decoration & Design Building (such Mortgage Loan, “The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan”), and (iv) the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Somerset Park Apartments (such Mortgage Loan, the “Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan”), representing approximately 10.4%, 10.4%, 6.8% and 3.8%, respectively, of the Initial Pool Balance, is a Split Mortgage Loan that is part of a Loan Combination.

There are no Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combinations, Subordinate Companion Loans or AB Loan Combinations related to this securitization transaction and, therefore, all references in this prospectus supplement to “Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combinations”, “Subordinate Companion Loans”, “AB Loan Combinations” or any related terms should be disregarded.

See “—The Loan Combinations” below for a description of, and information regarding, each of the Loan Combinations.

All of the Mortgage Loans included in the Issuing Entity (other than any Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan) are also sometimes referred to in this prospectus supplement as the “Serviced Mortgage Loans”. All of the Serviced Mortgage Loans, together with any Serviced Companion Loans, are also sometimes referred to in this prospectus supplement as the “Serviced Loans”.

Of the Mortgage Loans to be included in the Issuing Entity:

· Twenty-two (22) Mortgage Loans (the “CGMRC Mortgage Loans”), representing approximately 40.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, were originated by Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp., a New York corporation (“CGMRC”);

· Eleven (11) Mortgage Loans (together with the GS CRE Mortgage Loans (as defined below), the “GSMC Mortgage Loans”), representing approximately 30.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, were originated by Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, a New York limited partnership (“GSMC”);

· Eighteen (18) Mortgage Loans (the “Rialto Mortgage Loans”), representing approximately 19.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, were originated by Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Rialto”);

S-111

· Five (5) Mortgage Loans (the “GS CRE Mortgage Loans”), representing approximately 3.5% of the Initial Pool Balance, were originated by GS Commercial Real Estate LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“GS CRE”);

· Five (5) Mortgage Loans (the “KGS Mortgage Loans”), representing approximately 3.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, were originated by KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“KGS”); and

· Three (3) Mortgage Loans (the “RAIT Mortgage Loans”), representing approximately 2.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, were originated by RAIT Funding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“RAIT”).

CGMRC, GSMC, GS CRE, Rialto, KGS and RAIT are referred to in this prospectus supplement as the “Originators”. The GS CRE Mortgage Loans were originated for sale to GSMC. GSMC has acquired or will acquire the GS CRE Mortgage Loans on or prior to the Closing Date. Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. (the “Depositor”) will acquire the Mortgage Loans from CGMRC, GSMC, Rialto, KGS and RAIT (collectively, the “Sponsors”) on or about September 29, 2015 (the “Closing Date”). The Depositor will cause the Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool to be assigned to the Trustee pursuant to the Series 2015-GC33 pooling and servicing agreement, dated as of September 1, 2015 (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) among the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator and the Trustee.

Certain Calculations and Definitions

This prospectus supplement sets forth certain information with respect to the Mortgage Loans and the Mortgaged Properties. The sum in any column of the tables presented in Annex A, Annex B and Annex C to this prospectus supplement may not equal the indicated total due to rounding. The information in Annex A, Annex B, and Annex C to this prospectus supplement with respect to the Mortgage Loans (or any Loan Combination, if applicable) and the Mortgaged Properties is based upon the Mortgage Pool as it is expected to be constituted as of the close of business on the Closing Date, assuming that (i) all scheduled principal and interest payments due on or before the Cut-off Date will be made, (ii) there will be no principal prepayments on or before the Closing Date, and (iii) each Mortgage Loan with an anticipated repayment date pays in full on its related anticipated repayment date. When information presented in this prospectus supplement with respect to the Mortgaged Properties is expressed as a percentage of the Initial Pool Balance, the percentages are, in the case of multiple Mortgaged Properties securing the same Mortgage Loan, based on an allocated loan amount that has been assigned to the related Mortgaged Properties based upon one or more of the related appraised values, the related underwritten net cash flow or prior allocations reflected in the related Mortgage Loan documents as set forth on Annex A to this prospectus supplement. The statistics in Annex A, Annex B and Annex C to this prospectus supplement were primarily derived from information provided to the Depositor by each Sponsor, which information may have been obtained from the borrowers.

With respect to any Split Mortgage Loan, all debt service coverage ratio, debt yield and loan-to-value ratio information presented in this prospectus supplement is calculated and presented in a manner that reflects the aggregate indebtedness evidenced by the subject Split Mortgage Loan and any related Pari Passu Companion Loan, but without regard to any related Subordinate Companion Loan.

With respect to each Mortgaged Property, the appraisal of such Mortgaged Property, the Phase I environmental report, any Phase II environmental report and any seismic or property condition report obtained in connection with origination (each, a “Third Party Report”) were prepared prior to the date of this prospectus supplement. The information included in the Third Party Reports may not reflect the current economic, competitive, market and other conditions with respect to the Mortgaged Properties. The Third Party Reports may be based on assumptions regarding market conditions and other matters as reflected in those Third Party Reports. The opinions of value rendered by the appraisers in the appraisals are subject to the assumptions and conditions set forth in those appraisals.

“ADR” means, for any hospitality property, average daily rate.

S-112

“Allocated Cut-off Date Loan Amount” means, in the case of Mortgage Loans secured by multiple Mortgaged Properties, the allocated Cut-off Date Balance for each Mortgaged Property based on an allocated loan amount that has been assigned to the related Mortgaged Properties based upon one or more of the related appraised values, the related underwritten net cash flow or prior allocations reflected in the related Mortgage Loan documents; provided that with respect to any Loan Combination secured by a portfolio of Mortgaged Properties, the Allocated Cut-off Date Loan Amount represents only the pro rata portion of the related Mortgage Loan principal balance amount relative to the related Loan Combination principal balance. Information presented in this prospectus supplement (including Annex A and Annex B) with respect to the Mortgaged Properties expressed as a percentage of the Initial Pool Balance reflects the Allocated Cut-off Date Loan Amount allocated to such Mortgaged Property as of the Cut-off Date.

“Annual Debt Service” means, for any Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, the current annualized debt service payable on such Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan as of September 2015 (or, in the case of any Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan that has its first Due Date in October 2015, the anticipated annualized debt service payable on such Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan as of September 2015); provided that with respect to each Mortgage Loan with a partial interest-only period, the Annual Debt Service is calculated based on the debt service due under such Mortgage Loan during the amortization period. Additionally, with respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Greylyn Business Park, representing approximately 3.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, which amortizes based on the non-standard amortization schedule set forth on Annex G to this prospectus supplement, the Annual Debt Service is calculated based on the aggregate debt service during the 12-month period commencing August 6, 2017.

“Appraised Value” means, for each of the Mortgaged Properties and any date of determination, the most current appraised value of such Mortgaged Property as determined by an appraisal of the Mortgaged Property and in accordance with MAI standards. The appraisals for certain of the Mortgaged Properties may state an “as complete,” “as stabilized,” “prospective market value upon completion,” “as repaired,” “hypothetical,” “prospective as-is” or “as renovated” value (generally in addition to an “as-is” appraised value) for such Mortgaged Properties that assume that certain events will occur with respect to the re-leasing, renovation or other repositioning of the Mortgaged Property, and such stabilized values may, to the extent indicated, be reflected elsewhere in this prospectus supplement (including on Annex A and Annex B to this prospectus supplement). For such Appraised Values and other values on a property-by-property basis, see Annex A to this prospectus supplement and the related footnotes. In addition, for certain Mortgage Loans, the LTV Ratio at Maturity was calculated based on the “as stabilized” appraised value for the related Mortgaged Property, as described under the definition of LTV Ratio at Maturity. With respect to each Mortgaged Property, the Appraised Value set forth in this prospectus supplement (including on Annex A and Annex B to this prospectus supplement) is the “as-is” appraised value unless otherwise specified below, and is in each case as determined by an appraisal made not more than 5 months prior to the origination date of the related Mortgage Loan, as described under “Appraisal Date” on Annex A to this prospectus supplement.

In the following case, the Appraised Value set forth in this prospectus supplement and on Annex A or Annex B to this prospectus supplement is not the “as-is” Appraised Value, but is instead calculated as set forth below:

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hammons Hotel Portfolio, representing approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Appraised Value represents the aggregate “as-is” appraised value of $363,750,000 plus a $3,570,502 capital deduction related to franchise mandated capital improvements at three Mortgaged Properties for which the borrowers reserved $7,890,000 for the estimated mandatory and additional elective capital improvement costs.

“ARD” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, any related Anticipated Repayment Date.

“Balloon Balance” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan, the principal balance scheduled to be due on such Mortgage Loan or Companion Loan at maturity or any related Anticipated Repayment Date assuming that all monthly debt service payments are timely received and there are no prepayments or defaults.

S-113

“Crossed Group” identifies each group of Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool that are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with each other, if any. Each Crossed Group, if any, is identified by a separate letter on Annex A to this prospectus supplement.

“Cut-off Date LTV Ratio” or “Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio” generally means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, the ratio, expressed as a percentage of (1) the Cut-off Date Balance of that Mortgage Loan set forth on Annex A to this prospectus supplement divided by (2) the Appraised Value of the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties set forth on Annex A to this prospectus supplement, except as set forth below:

· with respect to any Split Mortgage Loan with a Pari Passu Companion Loan, the calculation of the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is based on the aggregate principal balance of such Split Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s);

· with respect to any Split Mortgage Loan with a Subordinate Companion Loan, the calculation of the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio does not include the principal balance of the related Subordinate Companion Loan;

· with respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hammons Hotel Portfolio, representing approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Appraised Value (which is also described under the definition of “Appraised Value” above) represents the aggregate “as-is” appraised value of $363,750,000 plus a $3,570,502 capital deduction related to franchise mandated capital improvements at three Mortgaged Properties for which the borrowers reserved $7,890,000 for the estimated mandatory and additional elective capital improvement costs . The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio for such Mortgage Loan calculated on the basis of the aggregate “as-is” appraised value without taking into account such capital deduction is 68.9%;

· with respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Somerset Park Apartments, representing approximately 3.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated based on the “as-stabilized” appraised value of $249,750,000, which assumes the completion of $14,632,500 of capital improvements as of May 20, 2016. An upfront replacement reserve of $26,500,000 is in place. The appraiser concluded to an “as-is” appraised value of $227,500,000. The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio for such Mortgage Loan based solely on the “as-is” appraised value is 79.1%;

· with respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio, representing approximately 2.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, unless otherwise indicated in this prospectus supplement, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated based on the Cut-off Date Balance of $21,000,000, less an amount equal to $800,000, which represents an economic holdback. The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio for such Mortgage Loan based solely on the unadjusted Cut-off Date Balance is 74.5%;

· with respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio, representing approximately 0.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, unless otherwise indicated in this prospectus supplement, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated based on the appraiser’s “as-is” value of $13,400,000, plus an amount equal to $894,188, representing the estimated cost to complete the related PIPs at the Mortgaged Properties. A reserve of $983,607 was established in connection with the PIPs, representing approximately 110% of the estimated remaining costs of the PIPs. The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio for such Mortgage Loan based solely on the “as-is” appraised value is 67.2%;

· with respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky, representing approximately 0.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, unless otherwise indicated in this prospectus supplement, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated based on the appraiser’s “as-is” appraised value of $14,700,000, plus an amount equal to $900,792, representing the estimated cost to complete the related PIP at the

S-114

Mortgaged Property. A reserve of $990,871 was established in connection with the PIP, representing approximately 110% of the estimated remaining costs of the PIP. The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio for such Mortgage Loan based solely on the “as-is” appraised value is 56.5%;

· with respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Easy Stop Storage Portfolio, representing approximately 0.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, unless otherwise indicated in this prospectus supplement, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated based on the Cut-off Date Balance of $8,200,000, less an amount equal to $200,000, which represents an earn out reserve. The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio for such Mortgage Loan based solely on the unadjusted Cut-off Date Balance is 68.4%; and

· with respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Residence Inn Southern Pines, representing approximately 0.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, unless otherwise indicated in this prospectus supplement, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated based on the appraiser’s “as-is” appraised value of $11,000,000, plus an amount equal to $356,034, representing the estimated cost to complete the related PIP at the Mortgaged Property. A reserve of $359,700 was established in connection with the PIP, which amount represents the amount for certain PIP costs. The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio for such Mortgage Loan based solely on the “as-is” appraised value is 66.7%.

“Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Cash Flow” or “Debt Yield on Underwritten NCF” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, the related Underwritten Net Cash Flow divided by the Cut-off Date Balance of that Mortgage Loan, except as set forth below:

· with respect to any Split Mortgage Loan with a Pari Passu Companion Loan, the calculation of the Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Cash Flow is based on the aggregate principal balance of such Split Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s); and

· with respect to the any Split Mortgage Loan with a Subordinate Companion Loan, the calculation of the Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Cash Flow does not include the principal balance of the related Subordinate Companion Loan.

“Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Operating Income” or “Debt Yield on Underwritten NOI” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, the related Underwritten Net Operating Income divided by the Cut-off Date Balance of that Mortgage Loan, except as set forth below:

· with respect any Split Mortgage Loan with a Pari Passu Companion Loan, the calculation of the Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Operating Income is based on the aggregate principal balance of such Split Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s); and

· with respect to the any Split Mortgage Loan with a Subordinate Companion Loan, the calculation of the Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Operating Income does not include the principal balance of the related Subordinate Companion Loan.

“DSCR,” “Debt Service Coverage Ratio,” “Cut-off Date DSCR” or “Underwritten NCF DSCR” generally means, for any Mortgage Loan, the ratio of Underwritten Net Cash Flow produced by the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties to the aggregate amount of the Annual Debt Service, except as set forth below:

· with respect to any Split Mortgage Loan with a Pari Passu Companion Loan, the calculation of the DSCR is based on the Annual Debt Service that is due in connection with such Split Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s);

· with respect to the any Split Mortgage Loan with a Subordinate Companion Loan, the calculation of DSCR does not include the monthly debt service that is due in connection with the Subordinate Companion Loan, unless expressly stated otherwise; and

· with respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Greylyn Business Park, representing approximately 3.7% of the Initial

S-115

Pool Balance, the DSCR is calculated using such Mortgage Loan’s non-standard amortization schedule as set forth in Annex G to this prospectus supplement, and based on the aggregate debt service during the 12-month period commencing August 6, 2017.

“Hard Lockbox” means that the borrower is required to direct the tenants to pay rents directly to a lockbox account controlled by the lender. With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Mix at Midtown, representing 2.0% of the Initial Pool Balance, certain tenants (including the largest tenant, 24 Hour Fitness) pay rent directly into a Hard Lockbox and the remaining tenants pay rent into a Soft Springing Lockbox. Hospitality and multifamily properties are considered to have a hard lockbox if credit card receivables are required to be deposited directly into the lockbox account even though cash, checks or “over the counter” receipts are deposited by the manager of the related Mortgaged Property into the lockbox account controlled by the lender.

“In-Place Cash Management” means, for funds directed into a lockbox, such funds are generally not made immediately available to the related borrower, but instead are forwarded to a cash management account controlled by the lender and the funds are disbursed according to the related Mortgage Loan documents with any excess remitted to the related borrower (unless an event of default or one or more specified trigger events under the related Mortgage Loan documents have occurred and are outstanding) generally on a daily basis.

“Largest Tenant” means, with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the tenant occupying the largest amount of net rentable square feet.

“Largest Tenant Lease Expiration” means the date at which the applicable Largest Tenant’s lease is scheduled to expire.

“Loan Per Unit” means the principal balance per unit of measure as of the Cut-off Date.

“Maturity Date LTV Ratio”, “Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio” or “LTV Ratio at Maturity” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan, the ratio, expressed as a percentage of (1) the Balloon Balance of a Mortgage Loan as adjusted to give effect to the amortization of the applicable Mortgage Loan as of its maturity date or anticipated repayment date, as applicable, assuming no prepayments or defaults, divided by (2) the Appraised Value of the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties shown on Annex A to this prospectus supplement, except as set forth below:

· with respect to any Split Mortgage Loan with a Pari Passu Companion Loan, the calculation of the LTV Ratio at Maturity is based on the aggregate Balloon Balance at maturity of such Split Mortgage Loan and the related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s);

· with respect to any Split Mortgage Loan with a Subordinate Companion Loan, the calculation of the LTV Ratio at Maturity does not include the principal balance of the related Subordinate Companion Loan; and

S-116

· with respect to the Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified in the table below, the respective LTV Ratio at Maturity was calculated using an “as stabilized” Appraised Value, as applicable, as opposed to the related “as-is” Appraised Value:

Mortgaged Property Name	% of Initial Pool Balance	Maturity Date LTV Ratio (“As Stabilized”)	“As Stabilized” Appraised Value	Maturity Date LTV Ratio (“As-Is”)	“As-Is” Appraised Value
Illinois Center	10.4%	50.6%	$470,000,000	61.0%	$390,000,000
Hammons Hotel Portfolio(1)	10.4%	55.5%	$371,300,000	56.1%	$367,320,502
Courtyard Sunnyvale	4.2%	61.5%	$60,600,000	64.3%	$58,000,000
Somerset Park Apartments	3.8%	72.1%	$249,750,000	79.1%	$227,500,000
Greylyn Business Park	3.7%	63.8%	$49,250,000	65.6%	$47,900,000
Pavilion Jenkintown	3.3%	51.2%	$49,000,000	53.3%	$47,100,000
Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio(2)	2.2%	63.2%	$29,100,000	65.2%	$28,200,000
Waterway Shoppes II	1.1%	62.3%	$16,200,000	66.2%	$15,250,000
TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio	0.9%	48.7%	$15,800,000	57.4%	$13,400,000
Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky	0.9%	46.0%	$16,800,000	52.6%	$14,700,000
Westgate Plaza	0.8%	46.3%	$14,300,000	46.5%	$14,240,000
Residence Inn Southern Pines	0.8%	58.0%	$11,600,000	61.2%	$11,000,000
Corporate Place	0.7%	58.4%	$10,250,000	63.1%	$9,500,000
Bricktown Shopping Center	0.7%	49.9%	$12,300,000	50.5%	$12,150,000
Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages	0.7%	45.2%	$10,900,000	46.9%	$10,500,000
Cherry Creek	0.5%	58.9%	$7,580,000	60.8%	$7,340,000
Glenville Target Center	0.5%	46.7%	$8,470,000	51.7%	$7,660,000
Glades Tower II	0.4%	53.3%	$7,200,000	54.8%	$7,000,000
Sonora Crossroads	0.4%	50.7%	$6,700,000	51.5%	$6,600,000
Albertson’s Retail Shops	0.4%	56.2%	$6,390,000	58.5%	$6,130,000

(1) The Maturity Date LTV Ratio is calculated using the “as stabilized” Appraised Value for the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX, Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ and Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO.

(2) The Maturity Date LTV Ratio is calculated using the “as stabilized” Appraised Value for the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Compass Self Storage Novi and Compass Self Storage Madison Heights.

We cannot assure you that the value of any particular Mortgaged Property will not have declined from the Appraised Value shown on Annex A to this prospectus supplement. No representation is made that any Appraised Value presented in this prospectus supplement would approximate either the value that would be determined in a current appraisal of the Mortgaged Property or the amount that would be realized upon a sale of the Mortgaged Property.

“Most Recent NOI” and “Trailing 12 NOI” (which is for the period ending as of the date specified in Annex A to this prospectus supplement) is the net operating income for a Mortgaged Property as established by information provided by the borrowers, except that in certain cases such net operating income has been adjusted by removing certain non-recurring expenses and revenue or by certain other normalizations. Most Recent NOI and Trailing 12 NOI do not necessarily reflect accrual of certain costs such as taxes and capital expenditures and do not reflect non-cash items such a depreciation or amortization. In some cases, capital expenditures may have been treated by a borrower as an expense or expenses treated as capital expenditures. Most Recent NOI and Trailing 12 NOI were not necessarily determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Moreover, Most Recent NOI and Trailing 12 NOI are not a substitute for net income determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as a measure of the results of a property’s operations or a substitute for cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as a measure of liquidity and in certain cases may reflect partial year annualizations.

“Occupancy” means, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, (i) in the case of multifamily, rental and mixed use (to the extent the related Mortgaged Property includes multifamily space) properties, the percentage of rental Units or Beds, as applicable, that are rented as of the Occupancy Date; (ii) in the case of office, retail, industrial, mixed use (to the extent the related Mortgaged Property includes retail or office space) and self storage properties, the percentage of the net rentable square footage rented as of the Occupancy Date (subject to, in the case of certain Mortgage Loans, one or more of the additional leasing assumptions); and (iii) in the case of hospitality properties, the percentage of available Rooms occupied for the trailing 12-month period ending on Occupancy Date. In some cases, occupancy was calculated based on assumptions regarding occupancy, such

S-117

as the assumption that a certain tenant at the Mortgaged Property that has executed a lease, but has not yet taken occupancy and/or has not yet commenced paying rent, will take occupancy on a future date generally expected to occur within twelve months of the Cut-off Date; assumptions regarding the renewal of particular leases and/or the re-leasing of certain space at the related Mortgaged Property; in some cases, assumptions regarding leases under negotiation being executed; in some cases, assumptions regarding tenants taking additional space in the future if currently committed to do so or, in some cases, the exclusion of dark tenants, tenants with material aged receivables, tenants that may have already given notice to vacate their space, bankrupt tenants that have not yet affirmed their lease and certain additional leasing assumptions. See the footnotes to Annex A to this prospectus supplement for additional occupancy assumptions. We cannot assure you that the assumptions made with respect to any Mortgaged Property will, in fact, be consistent with that Mortgaged Property’s actual occupancy. See “—Tenant Issues” below.

“Occupancy Date” means the date of determination of the Occupancy of a Mortgaged Property.

“Original Balance” means the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan as of the date of origination.

“Prepayment Penalty Description” or “Prepayment Provision” means the number of payments from the first due date through and including the maturity date or anticipated repayment date, as applicable, for which a Mortgage Loan is, as applicable, (i) locked out from prepayment, (ii) provides for payment of a prepayment premium or yield maintenance charge in connection with a prepayment, (iii) permits defeasance and/or (iv) permits prepayment without a payment of a prepayment premium or a yield maintenance charge.

“Related Group” identifies each group of Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool with sponsors affiliated with other sponsors in the Mortgage Pool. Each Related Group is identified by a separate number on Annex A to this prospectus supplement.

“RevPAR” means, with respect to any hospitality property, revenues per available room.

“Soft Lockbox” means that the related borrower is required to deposit or cause the property manager to deposit all rents collected into a lockbox account. Hospitality and multifamily properties are considered to have a soft lockbox if credit card receivables, cash, checks or “over the counter” receipts are deposited into the lockbox account by the borrower or property manager.

“Soft Springing Lockbox” means that the related borrower is required to deposit, or cause the property manager to deposit, all rents collected into a lockbox account until the occurrence of an event of default or one or more specified trigger events under the related Mortgage Loan documents, at which time the lockbox converts to a Hard Lockbox.

“Springing Cash Management” means, until the occurrence of an event of default or one or more specified trigger events under the Mortgage Loan documents, revenue from the lockbox account is forwarded to an account controlled by the related borrower or is otherwise made available to the related borrower. Upon the occurrence of an event of default or such a trigger event, the Mortgage Loan documents require the related revenue to be forwarded to a cash management account controlled by the lender and the funds are disbursed according to the related Mortgage Loan documents.

“Springing Lockbox” means a lockbox that is not currently in place, but the related Mortgage Loan documents require the imposition of a lockbox account upon the occurrence of an event of default or one or more specified trigger events under the related Mortgage Loan documents.

“Underwritten Expenses” with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Mortgaged Property, means an estimate of operating expenses, as determined by the related Originator and generally derived from historical expenses at the Mortgaged Property, the borrower’s budget or appraiser’s estimate, in some cases adjusted for significant occupancy increases and a market-rate management fee. We cannot assure you that the assumptions made with respect to any Mortgaged Property will, in fact, be consistent with that Mortgaged Property’s actual performance.

“Underwritten Net Cash Flow,” “Net Cash Flow” or “Underwritten NCF” with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Mortgaged Property, means cash flow available for debt service, generally equal to the Underwritten NOI decreased by an amount that the related Originator has determined for tenant improvement and leasing

S-118

commissions and/or replacement reserves for capital items. Underwritten NCF does not reflect debt service or non-cash items such as depreciation or amortization.

The Underwritten Net Cash Flow for each Mortgaged Property is calculated based on the basis of numerous assumptions and subjective judgments (including, but not limited to, with respect to future occupancy and rental rates), which, if ultimately proved erroneous, could cause the actual net cash flow for the Mortgaged Property to differ materially from the Underwritten Net Cash Flow set forth in this prospectus supplement. In some cases, historical net cash flow for a particular Mortgaged Property, and/or the net cash flow assumed by the applicable appraiser in determining the Appraised Value of the Mortgaged Property, may be less (and, perhaps, materially less) than the Underwritten Net Cash Flow shown in this prospectus supplement for such Mortgaged Property. No representation is made as to the future cash flows of the Mortgaged Properties, nor is the Underwritten Net Cash Flows set forth in this prospectus supplement intended to represent such future cash flows. See “Risk Factors—Underwritten Net Cash Flow Could Be Based on Incorrect or Failed Assumptions” in this prospectus supplement.

“Underwritten Net Operating Income” or “Underwritten NOI” with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Mortgaged Property, means Underwritten Revenues less Underwritten Expenses, as both are determined by the related Originator, based in part upon borrower supplied information (including but not limited to a rent roll, leases, operating statements and budget) for a recent period which is generally the 12 months prior to the origination date or acquisition date of the Mortgage Loan (or Loan Combination, if applicable), adjusted for specific property, tenant and market considerations. Historical operating statements may not be available for newly constructed Mortgaged Properties, Mortgaged Properties with triple net leases, Mortgaged Properties that have recently undergone substantial renovations and/or newly acquired Mortgaged Properties.

The Underwritten NOI for each Mortgaged Property is calculated based on the basis of numerous assumptions and subjective judgments (including, but not limited to, with respect to future occupancy and rental rates), which, if ultimately proved erroneous, could cause the actual net operating income for the Mortgaged Property to differ materially from the Underwritten NOI set forth in this prospectus supplement. In some cases, historical net operating income for a particular Mortgaged Property, and/or the net operating income assumed by the applicable appraiser in determining the Appraised Value of the Mortgaged Property, may be less (and, perhaps, materially less) than the Underwritten NOI shown in this prospectus supplement for such Mortgaged Property. No representation is made as to the future cash flows of the Mortgaged Properties, nor is the Underwritten NOI set forth in this prospectus supplement intended to represent such future cash flows.

“Underwritten Revenues” or “Underwritten EGI” with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Mortgaged Property, means an estimate of operating revenues, as determined by the related Originator and generally derived from the rental revenue (which may include rental revenue related to reimbursement of tenant improvements and leasing commissions) based on leases in place, leases that have been executed but the tenant is not yet paying rent, month-to-month leases (based on current rent roll and annualized), leases that are being negotiated and expected to be signed, additional space that a tenant has committed to take and in certain cases contractual rent steps generally within 16 months following the Cut-off Date in certain cases certain appraiser estimates of rental income, and in some cases adjusted downward to market rates, with vacancy rates equal to the Mortgaged Property’s historical rate, current rate, market rate or an assumed vacancy as determined by the related Originator; plus any additional recurring revenue fees. Additionally, in determining rental revenue for multifamily rental and self storage properties, the related Originator either reviewed rental revenue shown on the certified rolling 12-month operating statements or annualized the rental revenue and reimbursement of expenses shown on rent rolls or recent partial year operating statements with respect to the prior 1- to 12-month periods or in some cases may have relied on information provided in the appraisal for market rental rates and vacancy. In certain cases, with respect to Mortgaged Properties with leases with rent increases or rent decreases during the term of the related Mortgage Loan, Underwritten Revenues were based on the average rent over the term of the Mortgage Loan. In some cases the related Originator included revenue otherwise payable by a tenant but for the existence of an initial “free rent” period or a permitted rent abatement while the leased space is built out. See “—Tenant Issues” below.

“Units,” “Rooms” or “Beds” means (a) in the case of a Mortgaged Property operated as multifamily, the number of apartments, regardless of the size of or number of rooms in such apartment, (b) in the case of a Mortgaged Property that is operated as a hospitality property, the number of guest rooms or (c) in the case of a Mortgaged Property operated as a student housing property, the number of beds.

S-119

“Weighted Average Mortgage Loan Rate” means the weighted average of the Mortgage Loan Rates as of the Cut-off Date.

Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans

Overview

General Mortgage Loan Characteristics
(As of the Cut-off Date, unless otherwise indicated)

	All Mortgage Loans
Initial Pool Balance(1)	$958,489,233
Number of Mortgage Loans	64
Number of Mortgaged Properties	92
Average Cut-off Date Mortgage Loan Balance	$14,976,394
Weighted Average Mortgage Loan Rate(2)	4.59%
Range of Mortgage Loan Rates(2)	4.1100% – 5.3600%
Weighted Average Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio(2)(3)	66.6%
Weighted Average Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio(2)(4)	57.4%
Weighted Average Cut-off Date Remaining Term to Maturity Date (months)	119
Weighted Average Cut-off Date DSCR(2)(5)	1.66x
Full-Term Amortizing Balloon Mortgage Loans	28.4%
Partial Interest-Only Balloon Mortgage Loans	58.2%
Interest-Only Balloon Mortgage Loans	13.4%

(1) Subject to a permitted variance of plus or minus 5%.

(2) With respect to any Split Mortgage Loan, any related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s) is/are included for the purposes of calculating the Mortgage Loan Rate, Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio, Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio and Cut-off Date DSCR. With respect to any Split Mortgage Loan with a Subordinate Companion Loan, the Mortgage Loan Rate, Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio, Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio and Cut-off Date DSCR with respect to such Split Mortgage Loan is calculated without regard to such Subordinate Companion Loan, unless otherwise indicated. Other than as specifically noted, the Mortgage Loan Rate, Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio, Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio, Cut-off Date DSCR and Mortgage Loan Rate information for each Mortgage Loan is presented in this prospectus supplement without regard to any other indebtedness (whether or not secured by the related Mortgaged Property, ownership interests in the related borrower or otherwise) that currently exists or that may be incurred by the related borrower or its owners in the future.

(3) In most cases, the Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio for each Mortgage Loan is calculated utilizing the “as-is” appraised value. However, in the case of 7 Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 19.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, the respective Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio was calculated using certain adjustments and/or assumptions instead of the related “as-is” appraised value as described in the definitions of “Appraised Value” and/or “Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in this prospectus supplement. The weighted average Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio for the Mortgage Pool using only “as-is” appraised values and without making any of the adjustments and/or assumptions described in the definitions of “Appraised Value” and/or “Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in this prospectus supplement is 67.1%.

(4) In most cases, the Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio for each Mortgage Loan is calculated utilizing the “as-is” appraised value. However, in the case of 20 Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 47.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, the respective Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio was calculated using certain adjustments and/or assumptions instead of the related “as-is” appraised value as described in the definitions of “Appraised Value” and/or “Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in this prospectus supplement. The weighted average Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio for the Mortgage Pool using only “as-is” appraised values and without making any of the adjustments and/or assumptions described in the definitions of “Appraised Value” and/or “Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in this prospectus supplement is 59.5%.

(5) With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Greylyn Business Park, representing approximately 3.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, which amortizes based on the non-standard amortization schedule set forth on Annex G to this prospectus supplement, the Cut-off Date DSCR of such Mortgage Loan is calculated based on the aggregate debt service during the 12-month period commencing August 6, 2017.

See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in this prospectus supplement for important general and specific information regarding the manner of calculation of the underwritten debt service coverage ratios and loan-to-value ratios.

All of the Mortgage Loans (and Loan Combination(s)) are expected to have substantial remaining principal balances as of their respective maturity dates. This includes 5 Mortgage Loans, representing approximately

S-120

13.4% of the Initial Pool Balance that pay principal and interest for their entire terms, 38 Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 58.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, that pay interest-only for a portion of their respective terms and 21 Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 28.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, that pay interest-only for their entire terms through their respective maturity dates or anticipated repayment dates, as applicable.

The Issuing Entity will include 11 Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 36.0% of the Initial Pool Balance, that represent the obligations of multiple borrowers that are liable on a joint and several basis for the repayment of the entire indebtedness evidenced by the related Mortgage Loan and/or represent separate obligations of each borrower that are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with each other.

Property Types

Office Properties

Eight (8) office properties, representing collateral for approximately 26.5% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, secure, in whole or in part, 7 of the Mortgage Loans. A large number of factors may adversely affect the operation and value of office properties. See “Risk Factors—The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered Certificates May Present Special Risks—Office Properties” in the prospectus.

Certain of the office Mortgaged Properties may have specialty use tenants, such as dental or medical offices, physical therapy facilities (including aquatic physical therapy facilities), emergency room facilities, urgent care facilities, long-term care facilities, restaurants, fitness centers, health clubs, schools/classrooms, concert halls, broadcasting studios, rooftop cell towers and/or parking garages, as part of the Mortgaged Property. Further, certain of the office Mortgaged Properties derive a portion of Underwritten Net Revenue from such specialty use tenants. These Mortgaged Properties and the related leased space may not be readily convertible (or convertible at all) to alternative uses if those properties were to become unprofitable, or the leased spaces were to become vacant, for any reason.

Hospitality Properties

Nineteen (19) hospitality properties, representing collateral for approximately 22.8% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, secure, in whole or in part, 11 of the Mortgage Loans. All of the hospitality properties are flagged hotel properties that are affiliated with a franchise or hotel management company through a franchise or management agreement.

A hospitality property subject to a franchise or management agreement is typically required by the hotel chain to satisfy certain criteria or risk termination of its affiliation. We cannot assure you that the franchise agreement or management agreement will remain in place or that the hotel will continue to be operated under a franchised brand or under its current name. In addition, transferability of a franchise agreement is generally restricted. In the event of a foreclosure, the lender or its agent may not have the right to use the franchise license without the franchisor’s consent. See “Risk Factors—The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered Certificates May Present Special Risks—Hospitality Properties” in the prospectus.

S-121

The following table shows each Mortgaged Property associated with a hotel brand operated through a license, franchise agreement, operating agreement or similar agreement with an expiration date that occurs, or a franchisor termination right that may be exercised, during the term of such Mortgage Loan. Securing a new franchise license may require significant capital investment for renovations and upgrades necessary to satisfy a franchisor’s requirements.

Mortgaged Property Name	Mortgage Loan Cut- off Date Balance	Percentage (%) of the Initial Pool Balance by Allocated Loan Amount	Expiration/Termination of Related License/ Franchise Agreement	Mortgage Loan Maturity Date
Embassy Suites Concord, NC	$24,924,242	2.6%	8/12/2020	9/6/2025
Holiday Inn Express West Road	$8,500,000	0.9%	6/28/2023	9/6/2025
Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky	$8,300,000	0.9%	7/31/2020(1)	8/6/2020
Keystone	$5,790,000	0.6%	7/14/2025	8/6/2025
Park 100	$3,210,000	0.3%	7/14/2025	8/6/2025

(1) The related borrower and franchisor each have the option to terminate the franchise agreement on the fifth anniversary of the opening date under the related franchise agreement, which the related borrower has represented commenced at the origination of the related Mortgage Loan.

In addition, renovations, replacements and other work are ongoing at certain of the hospitality properties in connection with, among other things, franchise agreement and franchisor program requirements. See “—Redevelopment, Expansion and Renovation” below.

Certain of the hospitality properties may have a parking garage as part of the collateral. These Mortgaged Properties and the related leased space may not be readily convertible (or convertible at all) to alternative uses if those properties were to become unprofitable, or the leased spaces were to become vacant, for any reason. See “—Specialty Use Concentrations” below and “Risk Factors—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses” in this prospectus supplement.

Hospitality properties may be particularly affected by seasonality. The Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hyatt Plantation, Hyatt Place Rogers and Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages, representing approximately 1.0%, 0.7% and 0.7%, respectively, of the Initial Pool Balance, require seasonality reserves that were reserved in connection with the origination of such Mortgage Loans and/or that are required on an ongoing basis.

A large number of factors may adversely affect the operation and value of hospitality properties. See “Risk Factors—The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered Certificates May Present Special Risks—Hospitality Properties” in the prospectus.

Retail Properties

Twenty-seven (27) retail properties, representing collateral for approximately 22.5% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, secure, in whole or in part, 22 of the Mortgage Loans.

The presence or absence of an “anchor tenant” or a “shadow anchor tenant” in or near a retail property also can be important because anchors play a key role in generating customer traffic and making a center desirable for other tenants.

Ten (10) of the Mortgaged Properties, representing collateral for approximately 13.4% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, consist of a shopping center or other retail property that is considered by the applicable Sponsor to have at least one “anchor tenant.” Seven (7) of the Mortgaged Properties, representing collateral for approximately 3.9% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, are retail properties that are considered by the applicable Sponsor to be “unanchored.” Seven (7) of the Mortgaged Properties, representing collateral for approximately 3.9% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, are retail properties that are considered by the applicable Sponsor to be a “single tenant retail.”  Three (3) of the Mortgaged Properties, representing collateral for approximately 1.3% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, consist of a shopping center or other retail property that is considered by the applicable Sponsor to be “shadow anchored.”

S-122

Certain of the retail Mortgaged Properties may have specialty use tenants, such as theaters, medical and dental offices, physical therapy facilities, emergency room facilities, diagnostic laboratories, fitness centers, health clubs, dry cleaners, classrooms/educational centers, health professional schools, gas stations, schools, daycare facilities, houses of worship, performance studios, night clubs, parking garages, hospitals, animal hospitals, driving schools, hair salons and/or restaurants. These Mortgaged Properties and the related leased space may not be readily convertible (or convertible at all) to alternative uses if those properties were to become unprofitable, or the leased spaces were to become vacant, for any reason. See “—Specialty Use Concentrations” below and “Risk Factors—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses” in this prospectus supplement.

A large number of factors may adversely affect the operation and value of retail properties. See “Risk Factors—The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered Certificates May Present Special Risks—Retail Properties” in the prospectus.

Multifamily Properties

Fourteen (14) multifamily properties, representing collateral for approximately 13.1% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, secure, in whole or in part, 15 of the Mortgage Loans. A large number of factors may adversely affect the operation and value of multifamily properties. See “Risk Factors—The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered Certificates May Present Special Risks—Multifamily Rental Properties” in the prospectus.

With respect to the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Mason Town House, securing approximately 0.9% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, the property manager estimates that students account for 70-75% of the tenancy of the multifamily portion of the related Mortgaged Property.

With respect to the Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Barclay Village and Willow Park Apartments, representing approximately 1.0% and 0.6%, respectively, of the Initial Pool Balance, rely, in part, on subsidies under the Section 8 Tenant-Based Assistance Rental Certificate Program of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development or a similar state-run program. We cannot assure you that such programs will be continued in their present form or that the level of assistance provided will be sufficient to generate enough revenues for the related borrowers to meet their obligations under the related Mortgage Loans.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Imperial Landing Apartments, representing 0.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Mortgaged Property is subject to a land use restriction agreement requiring the related borrower to make at least 93 units at the Mortgaged Property (approximately 35% of the units at the Mortgaged Property) available to lower-income families, defined as families whose income does not exceed 80% of area median income when adjusted for family size. Affected units are subject to a rent cap of 30% of the income of a family whose income equals 65% of area median income, adjusted for family size and unit type.

Self Storage Properties

Eighteen (18) self storage properties, representing collateral for approximately 6.2% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, secure, in whole or in part, 6 of the Mortgage Loans. A large number of factors may adversely affect the operation and value of self storage properties. See “Risk Factors—The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered Certificates May Present Special Risks—Warehouse, Mini-Warehouse and Self Storage Facilities” in the prospectus.

Certain self storage Mortgaged Properties also derive a portion of the Underwritten Revenue from one or more of (a) rent derived from storage spaces used primarily for office and/or warehouse use located at the related Mortgaged Property, (b) rent derived from truck rentals located at the Mortgaged Property, (c) rent derived from on-site apartments leased out to third parties, (d) rent derived from cell tower and/or antenna leases, (e) rent derived from leasing billboard space to third parties, (f) the leasing of certain parking spaces located at the related Mortgaged Properties for purposes of recreational vehicle, other vehicle, and/or boat storage and/or (g) rent derived from retail operations.

S-123

Mixed Use Properties

Four (4) mixed use properties, representing collateral for approximately 4.8% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, secure, in whole or in part, 4 of the Mortgage Loans.

Each of the mixed use properties has one or more office, retail, self storage, flex and/or multifamily components. To the extent a mixed use property has office, retail, self storage, flex and/or multifamily components, such Mortgaged Property is subject to the risks relating to the applicable property types described in “Risk Factors—The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered Certificates May Present Special Risks—Retail Properties”, “—Office Properties” and “—Warehouse, Mini-Warehouse and Self-Storage Facilities” in the prospectus. A mixed use property may be subject to additional risks, including the property manager’s inexperience in managing the different property types that comprise such mixed use property.

Certain of the mixed use properties may have specialty use tenants, such as medical and dental offices, urgent care facilities, bio-medical facilities, theaters, parking garages, banks, ballroom event spaces, fitness centers, spas and/or restaurants. These Mortgaged Properties and the related leased space may not be readily convertible (or convertible at all) to alternative uses if those properties were to become unprofitable, or the leased spaces were to become vacant, for any reason. See “—Specialty Use Concentrations” below and “Risk Factors—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses” in this prospectus supplement.

Industrial Properties

Two (2) industrial properties, representing collateral for approximately 4.1% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, secure, in whole or in part, 2 of the Mortgage Loans. A large number of factors may adversely affect the operation and value of industrial properties. See “Risk Factors—The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered Certificates May Present Special Risks—Industrial Properties” in the prospectus.

Certain industrial Mortgaged Properties may also derive a portion of the Underwritten Revenues from revenue from (a) rent derived from the leasing of office space at the Mortgaged Property and (b) rent derived from cell tower leases.

Specialty Use Concentrations

As indicated on Annex A to this prospectus supplement, certain of the Mortgaged Properties have a restaurant as one or more of the 5 largest tenants (based on net rentable square footage) or as a single tenant operating at the related Mortgaged Property. Restaurants are subject to certain unique risks including that the restaurant space is not easily convertible to other types of retail or office space and that restaurant receipts are not only affected by objective factors but by subjective factors. For instance, restaurant receipts are affected by such varied influences as the current personal income levels in the community, an individual consumer’s preference for type of food, style of dining and restaurant atmosphere, the perceived popularity of the restaurant, food safety concerns related to personal health with the handling of food items at the restaurant or by food suppliers and the actions and/or behaviors of staff and management and level of service to the customers.

Certain of the Mortgaged Properties, including the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hamilton Landing, Mix at Midtown, Waterway Shoppes II, Premiere Building, Bricktown Shopping Center and Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills), which secure approximately 11.3%, in the aggregate, of the Initial Pool Balance, have a gym, fitness center, spa, martial arts studio or a health club as part of the related Mortgaged Property.

Certain of the Mortgaged Properties, including the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hamilton Landing, Pavilion Jenkintown, Dover Marketplace, Waterway Shoppes II, Plaza El Toro, Premiere Building, Westgate Plaza, Glades Tower II, Capital Clifton Park Self Storage and Park View Business Center, which secure approximately 15.8%, in the aggregate, of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, have tenants operating medical, dental, physical therapy (including aquatic therapy), emergency rooms, urgent care or veterinary offices and/or facilities, research or diagnostic laboratories or health professional schools as part of the related Mortgaged Property.

S-124

Certain of the Mortgaged Properties, including the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Dover Marketplace, Westgate Plaza, Albertson’s Retail Shops and 501 East Green Street, which secure approximately 2.7%, in the aggregate, of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, has a bank or credit union branch as the sole tenant or one of the 5 largest tenants, which tenants are identified on Annex A. Bank branches are specialty-use properties that are outfitted with vaults, teller counters and other customary installations and equipment that require significant capital expenditures. The ability to lease these properties to entities other than financial institutions may be difficult due to the added cost and time of refitting the properties.

Certain of the Mortgaged Properties, including the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as University Place, securing approximately 2.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, have a theater as part of the related Mortgaged Property.

Certain of the Mortgaged Properties, including the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Dover Marketplace, Dale Avenue Roanoke, Plantation Road Walmart and Walmart Orange Avenue, securing approximately 3.9%, in the aggregate, of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, have a gas station as part of the related Mortgaged Property.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Westgate Plaza, representing approximately 0.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, a house of worship is the largest tenant at the related Mortgaged Property.

These Mortgaged Properties and the related leased space may not be readily convertible (or convertible at all) to alternative uses if those properties were to become unprofitable, or the leased spaces were to become vacant, for any reason. See “Risk Factors—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses” in this prospectus supplement.

Mortgage Loan Concentrations

The table below presents the aggregate Cut-off Date Balance and percentage of Initial Pool Balance of the largest Mortgage Loans and the largest groups of Mortgage Loans with related borrowers:

Pool of Mortgage Loans

	Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
Top Mortgage Loan	$100,000,000	10.4%
Top 5 Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan)	$365,600,000	38.1%
Top 10 Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan)	$523,002,258	54.6%
Largest Related-Borrower Concentration(1)	$23,320,000	2.4%
Next Largest Related-Borrower Concentration(1)	$17,700,000	1.8%

(1) Excludes single-borrower Mortgage Loans and cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted Mortgage Loans that are not otherwise related to a borrower under any other Mortgage Loans.

Other than with respect to the largest 10 Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan), each of the other Mortgage Loans represents no more than approximately 2.2% of the Initial Pool Balance. See “Structural and Collateral Term Sheet” in Annex B to this prospectus supplement for more information on the largest 20 Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan).

S-125

The following table shows each group of Mortgage Loans that have borrowers that are related to each other, with such groups collectively representing approximately 4.8% of the Initial Pool Balance. No group of Mortgage Loans having related borrowers represents more than approximately 2.4% of the Initial Pool Balance.

Related Borrower Loans

Mortgaged Property Name	Cut-off Date Principal Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
Hyatt Plantation	$9,480,000	1.0%
Hyatt John’s Creek	6,950,000	0.7
Hyatt Place Rogers	6,890,000	0.7
Sub-Total	$23,320,000	2.4%
Plaza El Toro	$10,000,000	1.0%
Westgate Plaza	7,700,000	0.8
Sub-Total	$17,700,000	1.8%
Hunters Pointe	$3,392,210	0.4%
Woodview Commons	1,600,000	0.2
Sub-Total	$4,992,210	0.5%
Total	$46,012,210	4.8%

Mortgage Loans with related borrowers are identified under “Related Group” on Annex A to this prospectus supplement.

Geographic Concentrations

This table shows the states that have concentrations of Mortgaged Properties that secure 5.0% or more of the Initial Pool Balance:

Geographic Distribution⁽¹⁾

State	Number of Mortgaged Properties	Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
Illinois	14	$160,703,794	16.8%
California	7	$133,805,560	14.0%
New York	4	$77,320,018	8.1%
Texas	12	$76,079,346	7.9%
North Carolina	4	$73,390,541	7.7%
Florida	8	$62,190,566	6.5%
Michigan	4	$57,500,000	6.0%

(1) Because this table presents information relating to Mortgaged Properties and not the Mortgage Loans, the information for the Mortgage Loans secured by more than 1 Mortgaged Property is based on allocated loan amounts as stated in Annex A to this prospectus supplement.

S-126

Repayments by borrowers and the market value of the related Mortgaged Properties could be affected by economic conditions generally or specific to particular geographic areas or the regions of the United States, and concentrations of Mortgaged Properties in particular geographic areas may increase the risk that conditions in the real estate market where the Mortgaged Property is located, or other adverse economic or other developments or natural disasters (e.g., earthquakes, floods, forest fires, tornadoes or hurricanes or changes in governmental rules or fiscal policies) affecting a particular region of the country, could increase the frequency and severity of losses on Mortgage Loans secured by those Mortgaged Properties. For example:

· Mortgaged Properties located in California, Oregon, Oklahoma, Nevada, Arizona and Colorado, among others, are more susceptible to certain hazards (such as earthquakes and wildfires) than properties in other parts of the country.

· Mortgaged Properties located in coastal states, which include Mortgaged Properties located in, for example, Illinois, California, New York, Texas, North Carolina, Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Ohio, Georgia, Oregon, Indiana, New Jersey, Alabama, Wisconsin, South Carolina and Mississippi, among others, also may be more generally susceptible to floods or hurricanes than properties in other parts of the country. Hurricanes in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic States and in the Gulf Coast region have resulted in severe property damage as a result of the winds and the associated flooding. On October 29, 2012, Hurricane Sandy made landfall approximately five miles southwest of Atlantic City, New Jersey, causing extensive damage to coastal and inland areas in the eastern United States, including New York City, where certain of the Mortgaged Properties are located. The damage to the affected areas included, among other things, flooding, wind and water damage, forced evacuation, and fire damage. The cost of the hurricane’s impact, due to the physical damage it caused, as well as the related economic impact, is expected to be significant for some period of time, particularly in the areas most directly damaged by the storm. The Mortgage Loans do not all require flood insurance on the related Mortgaged Properties unless they are in a flood zone and flood insurance is available. We cannot assure you that any hurricane damage would be covered by insurance.

· Mortgaged Properties located in the states that stretch from Texas to Canada, with its core centered in northern Texas, as well as in the southern United States and particularly the northern and central parts of Mississippi, are prone to tornados.

· Mortgaged Properties, securing approximately 7.9%, 6.5%, 1.1% and 0.4% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, are located in Texas, Florida, Alabama and Mississippi, respectively, among other places, which may be adversely affected by events such as the oil platform explosion and subsequent oil spill that occurred in the Gulf of Mexico in April 2010. These events and similar events could lead to a regional economic downturn for the gulf coast region of the United States.

· In addition, certain of the Mortgaged Properties are located in cities or states that are currently facing or may face a depressed real estate market, which is not due to any natural disaster but which may cause an overall decline in property values.

Mortgaged Properties with Limited Prior Operating History

Seven (7) of the Mortgaged Properties, identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Courtyard Sunnyvale, Dale Avenue Roanoke, Plantation Road Walmart, Walmart Orange Avenue, Scott’s Edge Apartments, 210 Bedford Avenue and AkzoNobel Coatings, securing approximately 8.5%, in the aggregate, of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, were constructed, substantially renovated, re-positioned or repurposed 12 months or less prior to the Cut-off Date and, therefore, have no or limited prior operating history and/or lack historical financial figures and information.

Tenancies-in-Common

Certain borrowers may own a Mortgaged Property as tenants-in-common. In the case of the Mortgage Loans secured, in whole or in part, by the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Somerset Park Apartments, Courtyard at Cedar Hills, Peckham Square, CVS Paris and CVS Plano, representing approximately 3.8%, 1.4%, 1.3%, 0.3% and 0.2%, respectively, of the Initial Pool Balance, each of the related

S-127

borrowers are tenants-in-common. However, with respect to each such Mortgage Loan, the related tenants-in-common have waived their respective right to partition.

See “Risk Factors—The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks” in this prospectus supplement and “Risk Factors—The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks and/or Hinder Recovery” in the prospectus.

Condominium Interests

Four (4) of the Mortgage Loans, secured by the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Pavilion Jenkintown, Avenue District Apartments, Renaissance Faire I and Glades Tower II, collectively representing approximately 5.5% of the Initial Pool Balance, are secured in whole or in part by the related borrower’s interest in one or more units in a condominium. With respect to these Mortgaged Properties:

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Pavilion Jenkintown, representing approximately 3.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Mortgaged Property is part of a fractured condominium regime in which the related borrower owns one unit within an eight-unit condominium regime. The related borrower controls 11.326% of the voting rights of the condominium.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Avenue District Apartments, representing approximately 1.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Mortgaged Property is part of a fractured condominium regime in which the related borrower owns 59 out of 62 condominium units. The related borrower controls 87.2137% of the interest in the condominium.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Renaissance Faire I, representing approximately 0.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrower owns one of three (3) units that are part of a condominium regime. The borrower currently holds one-third of the voting interests in the condominium association and therefore does not control the decisions of the condominium association or its board of directors. However, the loan sponsor of the Mortgage Loan owns a controlling interest in the other two (2) units in the condominium regime (the “Other Units”) and therefore has the authority to control 100% of the condominium association voting interests. The related Mortgage Loan documents require that the borrower restrict its affiliated entities that own the Other Units from voting inconsistently with the requirements in the Mortgage Loan documents and from approving any action that would have a disproportionate negative effect on the Mortgaged Property. The Mortgage Loan documents do not restrict the loan sponsor from selling the Other Units, but if the loan sponsor were to sell such Other Units, the borrower would maintain veto power with respect to many decisions that require a unanimous vote of the condominium association or its board of directors.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Glades Tower II, representing approximately 0.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrower owns one of two medical office buildings that are part of a condominium regime. The borrower currently holds two of the five seats on the board of directors of the condominium association. The borrower does not control the condominium association, but holds 50.0% of the voting rights in the condominium association, which is the highest individual percentage. Voting by the members is on a one vote per unit basis. Decisions of the condominium association are made by majority vote (or in some cases, such as an amendment to the declaration, a supermajority vote), so the borrower maintains veto power.

Even if the borrower or its designated board members, either through control of the appointment and voting of sufficient members of the condominium board or by virtue of other provisions in the condominium documents, have consent rights over actions by the condominium associations or owners, we cannot assure you that the condominium board will not take actions that would materially adversely affect the borrower’s unit. See “Risk Factors—Lending on Condominium Units Creates Risks for Lenders That Are Not Present When Lending on Non-Condominiums” in the prospectus and “Risk Factors—Some Mortgaged Properties May Not Be Readily Convertible to Alternative Uses” in this prospectus supplement.

S-128

Leasehold Interests

For purposes of this prospectus supplement, an encumbered interest will be characterized as a “fee interest” and not a leasehold interest if (i) the borrower has a fee interest in all or substantially all of the Mortgaged Property (provided that if the borrower has a leasehold interest in any portion of the Mortgaged Property, and the fee interest in such portion is not also encumbered, then such portion is not, individually or in the aggregate, material to the use or operation of the Mortgaged Property), or (ii) the Mortgage Loan is secured by the borrower’s leasehold interest in the Mortgaged Property as well as the borrower’s (or other fee owner’s) overlapping fee interest in the related Mortgaged Property.

Two (2) Mortgaged Properties, identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as The Decoration & Design Building and Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL, securing approximately 6.8% and 1.1%, respectively, of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, are each subject to a mortgage, deed of trust or similar security instrument that creates a first mortgage lien on the borrower’s leasehold interest in the related Mortgaged Property.

Three (3) Mortgaged Properties, identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Embassy Suites Concord, NC, Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ and Westgate Plaza, securing approximately 2.6%, 1.2%, 0.8%, respectively, of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, are each subject to a mortgage, deed of trust or similar security instrument that creates a first mortgage lien on (x) one or more leasehold interests in a material portion of the related Mortgaged Property and (y) one or more fee interests in the remaining portion of the related Mortgaged Property.

In general, unless the related fee interest is also encumbered by the related Mortgage, each of the ground leases has a term that extends at least 20 years beyond the maturity date of the Mortgage Loan (taking into account all freely exercisable extension options) and, except as noted on Annex E, contains customary mortgagee protection provisions, including notice and cure rights and the right to enter into a new lease with the applicable ground lessor in the event a ground lease is rejected or terminated.

See “Risk Factors—Lending on Ground Leases Creates Risks for Lenders That Are Not Present When Lending on an Actual Ownership Interest in a Real Property” in the prospectus. See also Sponsor Representations and Warranties No. 34 (Ground Leases) on Annex E-1 to this prospectus supplement and any related exceptions on Annex E-2 to this prospectus supplement (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex E-1 to this prospectus supplement).

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as The Decoration & Design Building, representing approximately 6.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the current term of the related ground lease expires on December 31, 2023. The ground lease has two extension options, one for 25 years (to 2048) and a subsequent one for 15 years (to 2063). The related Mortgage Loan documents require the borrower to exercise the first renewal option not later than 60 days after the option first becomes available for exercise on December 31, 2019, failing which the lender may deliver to the ground lessor a pre-executed notice of exercise of the renewal option that is held by the related lender in escrow. The ground lease also includes a provision permitting the lender to exercise the renewal option within 30 days after the related borrower’s period to exercise the option has expired.

Condemnations

There may be Mortgaged Properties securing Mortgage Loans as to which there have been or are currently condemnations, takings and/or grant of easements affecting portions of such Mortgaged Properties, or property adjacent to such Mortgaged Properties, which, in general, would not and do not materially affect the use, value or operation of such Mortgaged Property.

S-129

Additional Indebtedness

The Mortgage Loans generally prohibit borrowers from incurring any additional debt secured by their Mortgaged Property without the consent of the lender. However:

· substantially all of the Mortgage Loans permit the related borrower to incur limited indebtedness in the ordinary course of business that is not secured by the related Mortgaged Property;

· the borrowers under certain of the Mortgage Loans have incurred and/or may incur in the future unsecured debt other than in the ordinary course of business;

· any borrower that is not required pursuant to the terms of its applicable Mortgage Loan documents to meet single-purpose entity criteria may not be restricted from incurring unsecured debt or mezzanine debt;

· the terms of certain Mortgage Loans permit the borrowers to post letters of credit and/or surety bonds for the benefit of the mortgagee under the Mortgage Loans, which may constitute a contingent reimbursement obligation of the related borrower or an affiliate. The issuing bank or surety will not typically agree to subordination and standstill protection benefiting the mortgagee;

· although the Mortgage Loans generally place certain restrictions on incurring mezzanine debt by the pledging of general partnership and managing member equity interests in a borrower, such as specific percentage or control limitations, the terms of the Mortgage Loan documents generally permit, subject to certain limitations, the pledge of the limited partnership or non-managing membership equity interests in a borrower or less than a controlling interest of any other equity interests in a borrower; and

· certain of the Mortgage Loans do not restrict the pledging of ownership interests in the borrower, but do restrict the transfer of ownership interests in a borrower by imposing limitations on transfer of control or a specific percentage of ownership interests.

Additional Secured Debt. The table below provides certain information with respect to each Split Mortgage Loan and its corresponding Companion Loan(s), that in each case are together secured by the same Mortgage on the related Mortgaged Property or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties.

Mortgaged Property Name	Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance	Aggregate Pari Passu Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance	Loan Combination Cut-off Date Balance	Loan Combination Interest Rate	Loan Combination Cut-off Date LTV	Loan Combination DSCR	Loan Combination Debt Yield on Underwritten NOI
Illinois Center	$100,000,000	10.4%	$160,000,000(1)	$260,000,000	4.4950%	66.7%	1.35x	9.1%
Hammons Hotel Portfolio	$100,000,000	10.4%	$150,800,000(2)	$250,800,000	4.9535%	68.3%	1.68x	12.4%
The Decoration & Design Building	$65,000,000	6.8%	$100,000,000	$165,000,000	4.1100%	41.3%	2.30x	13.8%
Somerset Park Apartments	$36,500,000	3.8%	$143,500,000(3)	$180,000,000	4.5500%	72.1%	1.77x	8.4%

(1) The Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans are currently comprised of the non-controlling notes A-2 and A-3, which have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $160,000,000.

(2) The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans are currently comprised of the non-controlling notes A-2, A-3 and A-4, which have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $150,800,000.

(3) The Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans are currently comprised of the controlling notes A-1-1 and A-2-1 and the non-controlling notes A-1-2 and A-2-2, which have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $143,500,000.

See “—The Loan Combinations” below for more information regarding these Companion Loans. Also see “Structural and Collateral Term Sheet—Illinois Center”, “—Hammons Hotel Portfolio”, “—The Decoration & Design Building” and “—Somerset Park Apartments” in Annex B to this prospectus supplement.

S-130

Existing Mezzanine Debt. Mezzanine debt is debt that is incurred by the direct or indirect owner of equity in one or more borrowers and is secured by a pledge of the equity ownership interests in such borrowers. Because mezzanine debt is secured by the obligor’s direct or indirect equity interest in the related borrowers, such financing effectively reduces the obligor’s economic stake in the related Mortgaged Property. The existence of mezzanine debt may reduce cash flow on the borrower’s Mortgaged Property after the payment of debt service and may increase the likelihood that the owner of a borrower will permit the value or income producing potential of a Mortgaged Property to fall and may create a slightly greater risk that a borrower will default on the Mortgage Loan secured by a Mortgaged Property whose value or income is relatively weak.

As of the Cut-off Date, except as disclosed in the following table, each Sponsor has informed us that it is unaware of any existing mezzanine or subordinate indebtedness with respect to the Mortgage Loans it is selling to the Depositor:

Mortgaged Property	Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance	Mezzanine Debt Cut-off Date Balance	Cut-off Date Total Debt Balance	Total Debt Interest Rate	Cut-off Date Mortgage Loan LTV	Cut-off Date Total Debt LTV	Cut-off Date Mortgage Loan NCF DSCR	Cut-off Date Total Debt NCF DSCR
Greylyn Business Park(1)	$35,625,000	3.7%	$5,375,000	$41,000,000	5.7800%	74.4%	85.6%	1.57x	1.18x

(1) The related mezzanine loan is currently being held by RMezz Greylyn BP, LLC, an affiliate of Rialto, and is secured by the mezzanine borrower’s interests in the related Mortgage Loan borrower.

The mezzanine loan related to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Greylyn Business Park, representing approximately 3.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, is subject to an intercreditor agreement between the holder of the mezzanine loan and the lender under the Mortgage Loan that sets forth the relative priorities between the Mortgage Loan and the mezzanine loan. Such intercreditor agreement or the mezzanine loan agreement generally provides, among other things, that (a) all payments due under the mezzanine loan are subordinate after an event of default under the Mortgage Loan to any and all payments required to be made under the Mortgage Loan (except for any payments from funds other than the Mortgaged Property or proceeds of any enforcement upon the mezzanine loan collateral and any mezzanine loan guarantees), (b) following an event of default under the Mortgage Loan, the mezzanine lender may accept payments and prepayments of the mezzanine loan only from non-property-related revenue, (c) the mezzanine lender will have certain rights to receive notice of and cure defaults under the Mortgage Loan prior to any acceleration or enforcement of the Mortgage Loan, (d) the mezzanine lender may amend or modify the mezzanine loan in certain respects without the consent of the mortgage lender, and the mortgage lender must obtain the mezzanine lender’s consent to amend or modify the Mortgage Loan in certain respects, (e) upon the occurrence of an event of default under the mezzanine loan documents, the mezzanine lender may foreclose upon the membership interests in the Mortgage Loan borrower, which could result in a change of control with respect to the Mortgage Loan borrower and a change in the management of the Mortgaged Property, (f) if the Mortgage Loan is accelerated or becomes specially serviced or if a monetary or material non-monetary default occurs and continues for a specified period of time under the Mortgage Loan or if the Mortgage Loan borrower becomes a debtor in a bankruptcy or if the mortgage lender exercises any enforcement action under the Mortgage Loan documents with respect to the Mortgage Loan borrower or the Mortgaged Property, the mezzanine lender has the right to purchase the Mortgage Loan, in whole but not in part, for a price generally equal to the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan, together with all accrued interest and other amounts due thereon, plus any advances made by the related mortgage lender or its servicer and any interest thereon plus, subject to certain limitations, any Liquidation Fees and Special Servicing Fee payable under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, but generally excluding any late charges, default interest, exit fees, spread maintenance charges payable in connection with a prepayment or yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums, and (g) an event of default under the Mortgage Loan will trigger an event of default under the mezzanine loan.

Generally, upon a default under the mezzanine loan described in the preceding paragraph, the holder of the mezzanine loan would be entitled to foreclose upon the equity in the related borrower, which has been pledged to secure payment of such debt. Although this transfer of equity may not trigger the due-on-sale clause under the related Mortgage Loan, it could cause a change in control of the borrower or a change in the management of the Mortgaged Property and/or cause the obligor under the mezzanine loan to file for bankruptcy, which could negatively affect the operation of the related Mortgaged Property and the related borrower’s ability to make payments on the related Mortgage Loan in a timely manner.

S-131

Permitted Mezzanine Debt. The Mortgage Loans generally place certain restrictions on the transfer and/or pledging of general partnership and managing member equity interests in a borrower such as specific percentage or control limitations as described under “—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—’Due-On-Sale’ and ‘Due-On-Encumbrance’ Provisions” below.

In addition, certain of the Mortgage Loans do not prohibit the pledge by direct or indirect owners of the related borrower of equity distributions that may be made from time to time by the borrower to its equity owners.

With respect to the Mortgage Loans listed in the following chart, the direct and indirect equity owners of the borrower are permitted to incur future mezzanine debt, subject to the satisfaction of conditions contained in the related Mortgage Loan documents, including, among other things, a combined maximum loan-to-value ratio, a combined minimum debt service coverage ratio and/or a combined minimum debt yield, as listed in the following chart:

Mortgaged Property Name	Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance	Combined Maximum LTV Ratio	Combined Minimum DSCR	Combined Minimum Debt Yield	Intercreditor Agreement Required
Hamilton Landing(1)	$60,000,000	6.3%	75.0%	1.30x	10.77%	Y
Somerset Park Apartments	$36,500,000	3.8%	75.0%	1.25x	N/A	Y
Courtyard at Cedar Hills	$13,000,000	1.4%	75.0%	1.10x	N/A	Y
Waterway Shoppes II	$11,000,000	1.1%	75.0%	1.25x	N/A	Y
Barclay Village	$9,800,000	1.0%	65.0%	1.40x	N/A	Y
TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio	$9,000,000	0.9%	80.0%	2.36x	13.92%	Y
AR&C Storage	$6,600,000	0.7%	69.0%	1.30x	9.0%	Y

(1) Future mezzanine debt is permitted only following an assumption under the related Mortgage Loan documents.

Each of the Mortgage Loans listed above conditions the incurrence of future mezzanine debt on the execution of an intercreditor agreement between the holder of the related mezzanine loan and the related lender under the related Mortgage Loan that, in each case, sets forth the relative priorities between the related Mortgage Loan and the related mezzanine loan.

Preferred Equity and Preferred Return. Further, borrowers under certain of the Mortgage Loans are permitted to issue preferred equity in such borrowers or in certain parent entities of such borrowers. Because preferred equity often provides for a higher rate of return to be paid to certain holders, preferred equity in some respects functions like mezzanine indebtedness, and reduces a principal’s economic stake in the related Mortgaged Property, reduces cash flow on the borrower’s Mortgaged Property after the payment of debt service and payments on the preferred equity and may increase the likelihood that the owner of a borrower will permit the value or income-producing potential of a Mortgaged Property to fall and may create a slightly greater risk that a borrower will default on the Mortgage Loan secured by a Mortgaged Property whose value or income is relatively weak.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hammons Hotel Portfolio, representing approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, upon the exercise of any right to purchase the properties pursuant to the JDH ROFR, as described in “—Litigation Considerations” below, by Jonathan Eilian or an entity controlled by Jonathan Eilian, the Revocable Trust of John Q. Hammons, dated December 28, 1989, as Amended and Restated (the “JQH Trust”), the borrower sponsor has committed to provide financing for such purchase by taking a preferred equity interest in the parent of the single purpose entity acquiring any such property in an amount equal to 22.5% of the cumulative purchase prices of the properties being purchased. Such preferred equity will be interest only, for a term of 5 years, at an interest rate equal to 30-day LIBOR plus 3.75% for years 1-3, increasing by 0.75% per year thereafter, and will be prepayable at any time, in whole or in part, without penalty. However, the purchasers of the properties must fund as equity in connection with their purchase, an aggregate minimum amount at least equal to 10% of the amount by which the all-in purchase price payable exceeds any initial senior acquisition financing obtained or assumed by the purchaser and in no event may they obtain any new first mortgage financing (excluding assumed loans) in excess of 67.5% of the all-in purchase price. Such preferred equity is required to be subordinate to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan, and subject to a customary subordination or recognition agreement.

S-132

With respect to the Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hyatt Plantation, Hyatt John’s Creek and Hyatt Place Rogers, representing approximately 1.0%, 0.7% and 0.7%, respectively, of the Initial Pool Balance, Select JV Holdings, L.L.C., an affiliate of Hyatt Hotels Corporation, is the Class B member of each of the related borrowers (the “Preferred Holder”). The Preferred Holder is entitled to a preferred distribution ahead of the class A members of each of the borrowers as well as a 5.0% annual preferred return on its capital contributions, which contributions (Hyatt Plantation - $2,964,891.68; Hyatt John’s Creek - $3,898,104.94; and Hyatt Place Rogers - $4,873,935.31) are each subject to a subordination and standstill agreement with the lender. The related capital contributions were made in exchange for prepayment of a portion of prior debt secured by each of the related Mortgaged Properties. There is no maturity date on the return of this entity’s capital contribution and the entity is not otherwise entitled to any other rights, remedies or required payments, with the exception of the ability to take control of the borrower in the event of, among other things, a bankruptcy, default, or termination of the franchise agreement by the borrower, each as set forth in the related Mortgage Loan documents. The preferred return is payable from excess cash flow.

Existing Unsecured Debt. With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Scott’s Edge Apartments, representing approximately 0.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrower received an unsecured loan from two of its affiliates in December 2014 in the original principal amount of approximately $1,763,100. Pursuant to a subordination and standstill agreement between the lenders of the unsecured loan and the lender, the unsecured loan is subordinated to the Mortgage Loan and, during certain trigger periods under the Mortgage Loan (caused by an event of default, the debt service coverage ratio falling below 1.15x or the debt yield falling below 7.20%), payments on the unsecured loan are not permitted.

Permitted Unsecured Debt. There may be other Mortgage Loans that permit the related borrower to incur unsecured loans or indebtedness, including unsecured loans in the ordinary course of business without limitation on the amount of such indebtedness.

Certain risks relating to additional debt are described in “Risk Factors—Other Financings or Ability to Incur Other Financings Entails Risk” in this prospectus supplement.

Environmental Considerations

An environmental report was prepared for each Mortgaged Property securing a Mortgage Loan no more than 8 months prior to the Cut-off Date. See Annex A to this prospectus supplement for the date of the environmental report for each Mortgaged Property. The environmental reports were generally prepared pursuant to the American Society for Testing and Materials standard for a “Phase I” environmental site assessment (each, an “ESA”). In addition to the Phase I standards, some of the environmental reports will include additional research, such as limited sampling for asbestos containing material, lead based paint, radon or water damage with limited areas of potential or identified mold, depending upon the property use and/or age. Additionally, as needed pursuant to American Society for Testing and Materials standards, supplemental “Phase II” site investigations have been completed for some Mortgaged Properties to further evaluate certain environmental issues, including certain recognized environmental conditions (each, a “REC”). A Phase II investigation generally consists of sampling and/or testing.

The environmental reports may have revealed material adverse conditions or circumstances at a Mortgaged Property:

· that were remediated or abated before the origination date of the related Mortgage Loan or are anticipated to be remediated or abated before the Closing Date;

· for which an operations and maintenance plan, abatement as part of routine maintenance or periodic monitoring of the Mortgaged Property or nearby properties will be in place or recommended;

· for which an escrow, guaranty or letter of credit for the remediation will have been established pursuant to the terms of the related Mortgage Loan;

S-133

· for which an environmental insurance policy will have been obtained from a third party insurer;

· for which the principal of the borrower or another financially responsible party will have provided an indemnity or will have been required to take, or will be liable for the failure to take, such actions, if any, with respect to such matters as will have been required by the applicable governmental authority or recommended by the environmental reports;

· for which such conditions or circumstances will have been investigated further and the environmental consultant has recommended no further action or remediation;

· as to which the borrower or other responsible party has obtained, or will be required to obtain post-closing, a “no further action” letter or other evidence that governmental authorities would not be requiring further action or remediation;

· that would not require substantial cleanup, remedial action or other extraordinary response under environmental laws; or

· for which the related borrower has obtained or sought to obtain or agreed to seek a “case closed” or similar status for the issue from the applicable governmental agency.

It was not uncommon for the environmental testing to reveal the presence of asbestos containing materials, lead based paint, mold and/or radon at any Mortgaged Property. Where these substances were present, the environmental consultant generally recommended, and the borrower was generally required to establish an operation and maintenance plan to address the issue or, in some cases involving asbestos containing materials and lead based paint, an abatement or removal program.

Other identified conditions could, for example, include leaks from surface level storage tanks, underground storage tanks (each, a “UST”), leaking underground storage tanks (each, a “LUST”), onsite dry cleaning facilities, gas stations, and on site spills. In such cases, corrective action, as required by the regulatory agencies, has been or is currently being undertaken and, in some cases, the related borrowers have made deposits into environmental reserve accounts. However, we cannot assure you that any environmental indemnity, insurance, letter of credit, guaranty or reserve amounts will be sufficient to remediate the environmental conditions or that all environmental conditions have been identified or that operation and maintenance plans will be put in place and/or followed.

Problems associated with mold may pose risks to the real property and may also be the basis for personal injury claims against a borrower. Although the Mortgaged Properties will be required to be inspected periodically, there is no set of generally accepted standards for the assessment of mold currently in place. If left unchecked, the growth of mold could result in the interruption of cash flow, litigation and remediation expenses which could adversely impact collections from a Mortgaged Property.

It is possible that the environmental reports and/or Phase II sampling did not reveal all environmental liabilities, or that there are material environmental liabilities of which we are not aware. Also, the environmental condition of the Mortgaged Properties in the future could be affected by the activities of tenants and occupants or by third parties unrelated to the borrowers. For further general discussion of the environmental matters that may affect the Mortgaged Properties, see “Risk Factors—Environmental Liabilities Will Adversely Affect the Value and Operation of the Contaminated Property and May Deter a Lender from Foreclosing” and “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Environmental Considerations” in the prospectus.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Plaza El Toro, representing approximately 1.0% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related ESA noted the presence of several tetrachloroethene (“PCE”) drums at such Mortgaged Property relating to a tenant’s on-site dry cleaning operations, in connection with which the environmental consultant observed signs of leakage and staining near the bases of such drums, which lack secondary containment other than a mat, and the absence of an epoxy sealant to the floor. The ESA noted that the Mortgaged Property had previously undergone remedial activities to address soil contamination resulting from on-site dry cleaning activities, leading to the issuance of a case closure letter in 1998. The ESA concluded that based on the length of time since such remedial activities and the nature of dry cleaning chemicals, the presence of a dry cleaning business at the

S-134

Mortgaged Property constitutes a REC. The environmental consultant does not expect the costs of clean-up, if required, to exceed $1.2 million. The related borrower has obtained an environmental insurance policy from Steadfast Insurance Company in the amount of $2 million with a deductible in the amount of $100,000. The related Mortgage Loan documents include a carve-out to the borrower and the related guarantor for losses resulting from a failure to pay such deductible.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky, representing approximately 0.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related ESA identified historical fill material of unknown origin placed throughout the Mortgaged Property by the City of Newport as a REC for the Mortgaged Property. Accordingly, the lender’s environmental consultant recommended a Phase II subsurface investigation for the Mortgaged Property. At the conclusion of the Phase II investigation the consultant recommended that the results be reported to the Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection (“KDEP”). On June 19, 2015, the City requested a determination of “No Further Remediation” for the Mortgaged Property in relation to the historic fill material. The request was granted by KDEP on July 28, 2015 under the condition that an environmental covenant be recorded on the Mortgaged Property restricting its use and that the City or any successor in interest notify KDEP of any changes in the use of the Mortgaged Property. Additionally, the property owner must submit to KDEP an annual report detailing the owner’s compliance and any lack of compliance with the terms of the environmental covenant. On June 26, 2015, the City entered into an environmental indemnity agreement with both the lender and the borrower by which the City agrees to indemnify the lender and the borrower from and against any and all losses imposed upon the lender and the borrower relating to the presence or release of any hazardous substance as a result of placement of fill on the Mortgaged Property, any REC identified in the related ESA, any non-compliance with or violations of environmental laws related to the placement of fill material on the Mortgaged Property, and, any personal injury, wrongful death, property damage or other damage resulting from the placement of fill material on the Mortgaged Property.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Westgate Plaza, representing approximately 0.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related ESA noted that a subsurface investigation conducted in 2006 identified PCE in soil at such Mortgaged Property relating to a tenant’s operation of a dry cleaning business. The related subsurface investigation report considered the PCE concentration de minimis and recommended no further investigation but that floors be sealed with epoxy. The ESA noted that floors do not appear to have been sealed with epoxy. The dry cleaning tenant has modified its operations to use a hydrocarbon-based solvent that does not contain PCE. The ESA concluded that based on the PCE contamination documented in 2006, the subsequent use of PCE until the dry cleaning tenant’s migration to a hydrocarbon-based solvent and the absence of an epoxy floor sealant, the historical use of PCE at the Mortgaged Property constitutes a REC. The environmental consultant does not expect the costs of clean-up, if required, to exceed $1.2 million. The related borrower has obtained an environmental insurance policy from Steadfast Insurance Company in the amount of $2 million with a deductible in the amount of $50,000. Under the related Mortgage Loan documents the borrower and the related guarantor have recourse liability for losses resulting from a failure to pay such deductible.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Cherry Creek, representing approximately 0.5% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related ESA indicated that there was evidence of an active dry cleaning business. Pride Cleaners, which has operated at the Mortgaged Property since 1970, enrolled in the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Site Remediation Program in 2004 and is characterized as a controlled REC. Due to observations of current conditions and no reported violations, no action is being taken at this time. However, the borrower obtained an Environmental Impairment Liability insurance policy with Lloyd’s of London (Beazley) naming the lender as an additional named insured, with a policy limit of $2 million per incident and in the aggregate, a deductible of $50,000 and a policy coverage period of ten years plus 30 days, and an optional extended reporting period of 36 months that extends coverage through the maturity date of the Mortgage Loan. The policy premium was paid in full.

With respect to the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A of this prospectus supplement as Mason Town House, securing approximately 0.9% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, the related ESA identified elevated concentrations of radon above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“USEPA”) guideline of 4 pCi/L in various residential buildings tested. Follow-up radon testing was conducted, and 28 residential units were identified as having radon levels above the USEPA guideline. Based on the follow-up testing, the lender held back $40,000 at closing, covering approximately 120% of the cost estimated to install a radon mitigation system in the areas of exceedance. Within 90 days of closing, the borrower is to inspect any un-sampled

S-135

residential units for radon, have a radon mitigation unit installed in any residential unit in which the radon level exceeds the USEPA guideline, and provide evidence of such installation to the lender.

With respect to the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Compass Self Storage Novi, securing approximately 0.8% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, the related ESA identifies impacts associated with historical manufacturing activities as a REC for the Mortgaged Property. The historical contamination, for which a third-party unrelated to borrower appears to be responsible, resulted in a Baseline Environmental Site Assessment (“BEA”) being prepared for the Mortgaged Property in 2010. A BEA allows the person(s) on whose behalf it was performed to purchase or begin operating at a facility, without taking on liability for the cleanup of historic contamination. The 2010 BEA for the Mortgaged Property was performed on behalf of five different entities, including the current site owner. The BEA includes a Due Care plan (“DCP”) that restricts the use of the site to commercial and/or industrial purposes, prevents the installation of water wells for drinking or irrigation purposes, and includes various obligations in relation to any future site improvements. Because of the existing BEA and DCP and the continued use of the site as a self-storage facility, the related ESA consultant did not recommend any additional investigation.

With respect to the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Compass Self Storage Madison Heights, securing approximately 0.6% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, the related ESA identified impacts associated with historical industrial activities as a REC for the Mortgaged Property. The historical contamination, for which a third-party unrelated to the borrower appears to be responsible, resulted in a BEA being prepared for the Property in 2010. A BEA allows the person(s) on whose behalf it was performed to purchase or begin operating at a facility, without taking on liability for the cleanup of historic contamination. The 2010 BEA for the Mortgaged Property appears to have been performed on behalf of the current site owner. The BEA includes a DCP that restricts the use of the site to commercial and/or industrial purposes, prevents the installation of water wells for drinking or irrigation purposes, and includes various obligations in relation to any future site improvements. Because of the existing BEA and DCP and the continued use of the site as a self-storage facility, the related ESA consultant did not recommend any additional investigation.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as 4238 West Hundred Road, representing approximately 0.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related ESA identified the levels of benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and total xylenes (“BTEX”) and 2-butanone, total xylenes, and methyl-tert-butyl ether (“MTBE”) detected in the soil of the Mortgaged Property to be a vapor encroachment concern and a REC. The Phase I ESA recommended further investigation, at an estimated cost of $5,250, which could result in the installation of a sub-slab depressurization system, at an estimated cost of $40,640 - $70,250.

Litigation Considerations

Below are descriptions of certain material current litigation matters relating to certain Mortgage Loans. Certain risks relating to litigation regarding the Mortgaged Properties or the borrowers are described in “Risk Factors—Litigation Regarding the Mortgaged Properties or Borrowers May Impair Your Distributions” in this prospectus supplement.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hammons Hotel Portfolio, representing approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, each Mortgaged Property is indirectly owned by the Revocable Trust of John Q. Hammons, dated December 28, 1989, as Amended and Restated (the “JQH Trust”). In 2005, the JQH Trust reached an agreement with an entity controlled by Jonathan Eilian (“Eilian”) to take private a public company in which JQH Trust owned a substantial interest, with the JQH Trust (for tax purposes) receiving a preferred equity interest in exchange for its ownership interest (the “Atrium Preferred Equity”) in a new entity, Atrium Hotels, L.P. (formerly known as the John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P.) (“Atrium LP”), which indirectly owns the hotels that were owned by the public company, with a liquidation preference at that time of $335 million. In connection with taking the public company private, the JQH Trust gave a right of first refusal (the “JDH ROFR”) to JD Holdings, LLC (“JD Holdings”), an entity controlled by Eilian, with respect to certain enumerated properties owned by the JQH Trust and additional properties developed by the JQH Trust (the “JQH Hotels”). Although subject to dispute, the JDH ROFR purported to give JD Holdings the right to match any bona fide sale price in the event the JQH Trust sold any JQH Hotels. Additionally, and also subject to disputed interpretations, the JDH ROFR provided that the JQH Trust and related affiliates were required upon the death of John Q. Hammons (“JQH”), to sell all of the JQH Hotels no later than the later to occur of (a) two (2) years after the date of JQH’s demise, and (b) full redemption or other permitted disposition by

S-136

JQH and his affiliates of all of his and their Atrium Preferred Equity. Further, and subject to disputed interpretations, the agreement governing the JDH ROFR provided that JD Holdings may have the right to exercise the JDH ROFR at a 20% discount off the purchase price of any property ultimately determined to be subject to the right of first refusal as to which a material breach of the JDH ROFR is established. Additionally, the partnership agreement of Atrium LP provides that if the Atrium Preferred Equity has not been redeemed before JQH’s death, then Atrium LP must begin liquidating its assets on or before a date that is eighteen months after the first business day after the earlier to occur of (i) Hammons’s death or (ii) one month after the seventh anniversary of the effective date of the partnership agreement if a liquidation notice has been received (October 16, 2018). JQH died in May of 2013.

There is ongoing litigation that commenced prior to the death of JQH between JD Holdings and certain affiliated entities and JQH Trust and certain of its affiliates (including one or more borrowers under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan) disputing the interpretation of the JDH ROFR and the terms of the Atrium LP partnership agreement. Among the matters in dispute are the validity of the JDH ROFR, the required timing of the sale of the JQH Hotels, whether a liquidation of Atrium LP constitutes a disposition by JQH or his affiliates, the calculation of the redemption price of the Atrium Preferred Equity and which assets are subject to the JDH ROFR. In October 2014, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware issued a Memorandum Opinion granting in part JD Holdings’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Some claims are still outstanding and the JQH Trust has indicated that it intends to appeal the ruling on the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings once a final order is entered. However, any further action was stayed in April 2015 pending the completion of the liquidation of Atrium LP which JD Holdings and its affiliates contend is ongoing. It is expected that the JQH Trust will receive notice of the liquidation of Atrium LP in the fall of 2015.

The JQH Trust (through John Q. Hammons Hotels Development, LLC (the “iStar Borrower”)) also received a $275 million line of credit (the “Line of Credit”) from Atrium Lendco, LLC (“Atrium Lendco”), an entity controlled by Eilian (and utilizing funds provided by iStar Financial Inc. (“iStar”), in connection with the above described transactions in 2005. The servicing of the Line of Credit was subsequently assigned back to an affiliate of iStar. iStar has a minority ownership interest in Atrium LP. To date, $110,000,000 has been drawn against the line of credit and $37,000,000 of accrued interest has been capitalized (for a total outstanding balance $147,000,000). The line of credit has an interest rate of LIBOR, subject to a floor of 3.22%, plus 1%, and matures on March 15, 2021. The iStar Borrower is the direct owner of the borrowers owning the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Embassy Suites in Concord, NC, Renaissance Hotel in Glendale, AZ, Embassy Suites in Huntsville, AL, and Embassy Suites in Murfreesboro, TN. The line of credit is also secured by additional collateral other than the equity in the 4 borrowers, including the Atrium Preferred Equity. Any proceeds from the redemption or liquidation of the Atrium Preferred Equity is required to be applied to the outstanding balance of the Line of Credit. The Line of Credit has been guaranteed by the JQH Trust. As additional collateral for the Line of Credit, the JQH Trust has pledged its equity interest in the iStar Borrower. In addition, and given that iStar loaned the funds to Atrium Lendco (who in turn loaned the funds to iStar Borrower), the Line of Credit is recourse to Atrium Lendco and an affiliated entity controlled by Eilian and is further secured by the assignment of various contractual rights from Atrium Lendco and other affiliated entities controlled by Eilian.

iStar brought an action against the JQH Trust in 2013 seeking a declaratory judgment as to an alleged default under the loan agreement on the basis of an alleged breach of a net worth covenant by the JQH Trust, and accelerated the line of credit and commenced a UCC foreclosure sale of the Atrium Preferred Equity collateral securing the line of credit. The court denied a motion for partial summary judgment brought by iStar, and granted the JQH Trust defendants a temporary restraining order barring iStar from non-judicially foreclosing on the Atrium Preferred Equity and other collateral. Fact discovery for these proceedings is ongoing, and is subject to a court-ordered completion deadline of December 11, 2015. We cannot assure you that this litigation will not be settled or determined in favor of iStar. However, a foreclosure by iStar would be (a) a transfer that is not permitted under the Mortgage Loan documents if done without the consent of the lender under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan and (b) though subject to disputed interpretations, a “disposition” of the Atrium Preferred Equity as discussed above that could trigger the sale of the JQH Hotels and the JDH ROFR.

In the event JD Holdings exercises its right to purchase the properties under the JDH ROFR, the related Mortgage Loan documents pre-approved the assumption of the Mortgage Loan by Eilian or an Eilian controlled affiliate, subject to approval of the financial statements of the replacement carveout guarantor. Additionally, the sale of any JQH Hotels that are Mortgaged Properties could result in a release of the properties from the lien of the loan and a prepayment as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans— Partial Releases—Property Releases; Partial Prepayments” below.

S-137

We cannot assure you that (i) the above described litigations will not be ongoing, (ii) either of such litigations will be determined in favor of JQH Trust and its affiliates and subsidiaries, (iii) Atrium LP will be liquidated, (iv) JQH will receive up to $335 million in redemption for the Atrium Preferred Equity to satisfy all or a portion of the Line of Credit in connection with any liquidation of Atrium LP, or in fact any amounts at all in redemption of the Atrium Preferred Equity, (v) the JQH Hotels will or will not be marketed for sale or (vi) the JDH ROFR will be exercised. Additionally, affiliates of JQH Trust currently manage approximately 33 of the properties owned by Atrium LP and we cannot assure you that a JQH Trust affiliate will continue to manage those properties if Atrium LP is liquidated as the related management agreement provides for certain termination rights upon a sale of the properties and/or liquidation of Atrium LP.

For additional information, see Sponsor Representations and Warranties Nos. (6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance, (13) Actions Concerning Mortgage Loan and (30) Due-on-Sale or Encumbrance on Annex E-1 to this prospectus supplement and any related exceptions on Annex E-2 to this prospectus supplement (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex E-1 to this prospectus supplement).

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as University Place, representing approximately 2.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, there are currently two class action suits against the related sponsor relating to his role on an unrelated board each alleging a violation of fiduciary duty. The matter is expected to be covered by the directors and officers insurance of the unrelated entity.

We cannot assure you that these above-described litigations would not have an adverse effect on, or provide any indication of the future performance of the obligors or the non-recourse carveout guarantors under, the related Mortgage Loans.

Redevelopment, Expansion and Renovation

Certain of the Mortgaged Properties are properties which are currently undergoing or, in the future, are expected to undergo redevelopment, renovation or expansion, including with respect to hospitality properties, property improvement plans (“PIPs”) required by the franchisors. Below are descriptions of certain of such Mortgaged Properties. Certain risks related to redevelopment, expansion and renovation at a Mortgaged Property are described in “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Redevelopment, Expansion and Renovation at Mortgaged Properties” in this prospectus supplement.

With respect to the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX, securing approximately 1.3% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, there are planned renovations and capital improvements including new flooring and wall vinyl for common areas and guestrooms, totaling approximately $1,944,314 (for which the borrower has reserved $1,940,000).

With respect to the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ, securing approximately 1.2% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, there are planned renovations and capital improvements in 2016 totaling approximately $650,000 and a full property renovation in 2017 which will include new flooring for all common areas and guestrooms (for which the borrower has reserved $5,000,000).

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hyatt Plantation, representing approximately 1.0% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrower is required to complete a PIP under the related franchise agreement. The PIP requires upgrades to the public areas, meeting facilities, public restrooms and guestrooms, which are expected to be completed by September 2016. The sum of $2,003,901.58 was reserved at origination, representing 100% of the projected cost of completion of the PIP.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio, representing approximately 0.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgaged Properties were acquired at the origination of the Mortgage Loan and the related borrower is completing a $1,236,888 renovation, which includes an $894,188 change of ownership PIP and $342,700 in discretionary capital expenditures. The sum of $1,360,577 was reserved in PIP and furniture, fixtures and equipment (“FF&E”) reserve accounts at origination, representing 110% of the projected cost of completion of the PIP and discretionary capital expenditures.

S-138

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky, representing approximately 0.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgaged Property was acquired at the origination of the Mortgage Loan and a $900,792 PIP commenced at the closing of the Mortgage Loan, for which $990,871, representing 110% of the estimated cost of the PIP, was reserved at closing. The franchise license documents require the PIP to be completed within 12 months.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hyatt John’s Creek, representing approximately 0.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrower is required to complete a PIP under the related franchise agreement. The PIP requires upgrades to the lobby, public areas, meeting facilities, guestrooms, bathrooms and fitness center, and is expected to be completed in September 2016. The sum of $1,829,774.73 was reserved at origination, representing 100% of the projected cost of completion of the PIP.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hyatt Place Rogers, representing approximately 0.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrower is required to complete a PIP under the related franchise agreement. The PIP requires upgrades to the public areas, meeting facilities and guestroom corridors, which are expected to be completed by September 2016. The sum of $1,634,165.51 was reserved at origination, representing 100% of the projected cost of completion of the PIP.

With respect to the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO, securing approximately 0.5% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, there are planned renovations and capital improvements, including guestroom updates and new flooring and wall vinyl for common areas, totaling approximately $976,188 (for which the borrower has reserved $950,000).

We cannot assure you that these above described renovations and build outs will not temporarily interfere with the use and operation of portions of the related Mortgaged Property and/or make the related Mortgaged Property less attractive to potential guests, patrons, customers and/or tenants. See “Structural and Collateral Term Sheet” in Annex B to this prospectus supplement for additional information on the 10 largest Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan).

Default History, Bankruptcy Issues and Other Proceedings

One (1) of the Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 1.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, by allocated loan amount, was a refinancing in whole or in part of a loan that was in default at the time of refinancing or otherwise involved discounted pay-offs or provided acquisition financing for the related borrower’s purchase of the related Mortgaged Property at a foreclosure sale or after becoming REO, as described below:

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Waterway Shoppes II, representing approximately 1.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrower was the obligor under a prior loan secured by the related Mortgaged Property that was in default and in special servicing. The prior loan was subsequently sold at a discount to a party not affiliated with the current mortgage loan seller (the “New Noteholder”). The New Noteholder and the borrower negotiated a modification to the prior loan, including an increase in interest rate and a decrease in the then current unpaid principal balance. The Mortgage Loan refinanced the modified prior loan in full.

Certain of the borrowers, principals of the borrowers and other entities under the control of such principals are or previously have been parties to bankruptcy proceedings, criminal proceedings, foreclosure proceedings, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transactions and/or mortgage loan workouts, in addition to any bankruptcy related litigation issues discussed above in “—Litigation Considerations”, which in some cases may have involved a Mortgaged Property that secures a Mortgage Loan to be included in the Issuing Entity. For example, with respect to the 20 largest Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan, and considering any related Mortgage Loans under common borrower sponsorship) and other than as set forth above:

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hamilton Landing, representing approximately 6.3% of the Initial Pool

S-139

Balance, the related borrower sponsors were parties to 8 foreclosure proceedings, 5 deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure and 1 discounted payoff between 2010 and 2014 that were unrelated to the Mortgaged Property.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Greylyn Business Park, representing approximately 3.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, one of the borrower sponsors was a party to a foreclosure proceeding and two discounted payoffs between 2006 and 2008 which were unrelated to the Mortgaged Property.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Mix at Midtown, representing approximately 2.0% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrower sponsors were parties to a discounted payoff of a construction loan secured by the related Mortgaged Property in December 2010.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Peckham Square, representing approximately 1.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, one of the borrower sponsors was party to foreclosure proceedings in December 2011 and a discounted payoff (through a discounted purchase of the related debt instrument) that were unrelated to the Mortgaged Property.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Courtyard at Cedar Hills, representing approximately 1.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, one of the borrower sponsors was a party to a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure in 2012 which was unrelated to the Mortgaged Property.

We cannot assure you that there are no other bankruptcy proceedings, foreclosure proceedings, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure transactions and/or mortgage loan workout matters that involved one or more Mortgage Loans or Mortgaged Properties, and/or a guarantor, borrower, sponsor or other party to a Mortgage Loan.

Certain risks relating to bankruptcy proceedings are described in “Risk Factors—A Bankruptcy Proceeding May Result in Losses and Delays in Realizing on the Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement and “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Issues” in the prospectus.

Tenant Issues

Tenant Concentrations

Mortgaged properties that are owner-occupied or leased to a single tenant, or a tenant that makes up a significant portion of the rental income, also are more susceptible to interruptions of cash flow if that tenant’s business operations are negatively impacted, if that tenant defaults or if that tenant fails to renew its lease. This is so because:

· the financial effect of the absence of rental income may be severe;

· more time may be required to re-lease the space; and

· substantial capital costs may be incurred to make the space appropriate for replacement tenants.

See Annex A to this prospectus supplement for tenant lease expiration dates for the 5 largest tenants (based on net rentable square footage) at each retail, office, industrial and mixed use Mortgaged Property.

The Mortgaged Properties have single tenants as set forth below:

· Nine (9) of the Mortgaged Properties, securing 5 Mortgage Loans, and representing in the aggregate approximately 5.2% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, are each leased to a single tenant.

S-140

· No Mortgaged Property leased to a single tenant secures a Mortgage Loan representing more than approximately 2.7% of the Initial Pool Balance.

With respect to certain of these Mortgaged Properties that are leased to a single tenant, the related leases may expire prior to, or soon after, the maturity dates of the Mortgage Loans or the related tenant may have the right to terminate the lease prior to the maturity date of the Mortgage Loan. If the current tenant does not renew its lease on comparable economic terms to the expired lease, if a single tenant terminates its lease or if a suitable replacement tenant does not enter into a new lease on similar economic terms, there could be a negative impact on the payments on the related Mortgage Loans.

Set forth below are certain tenants that are among the 5 largest tenants (based on net rentable square footage) at each of 2 or more Mortgaged Properties that collectively secure 2.0% or more of the Initial Pool Balance:

· Best Buy is a tenant at each of 2 Mortgaged Properties, and such Mortgaged Properties secure approximately 4.5%, in the aggregate, of the Initial Pool Balance based on allocated loan amount.

· Hobby Lobby is a tenant at each of 2 Mortgaged Properties, and such Mortgaged Properties secure approximately 2.8%, in the aggregate, of the Initial Pool Balance based on allocated loan amount.

· Walmart is a tenant at each of 3 Mortgaged Properties, and such Mortgaged Properties secure approximately 2.7%, in the aggregate, of the Initial Pool Balance based on allocated loan amount.

· Sally Beauty is a tenant at each of 2 Mortgaged Properties, and such Mortgaged Properties secure approximately 2.0%, in the aggregate, of the Initial Pool Balance based on allocated loan amount.

In the event of a default by that tenant, if the related lease expires prior to the Mortgage Loan maturity date and the related tenant fails to renew its lease or if such tenant exercises an early termination option, there would likely be an interruption of rental payments under the lease and, accordingly, insufficient funds available to the borrower to pay the debt service on the loan. In certain cases where the tenant owns the improvements to the Mortgaged Property, the related borrower may be required to purchase such improvements in connection with the exercise of its remedies.

Lease Expirations and Terminations

Lease Expirations. See Annex A to this prospectus supplement for tenant lease expiration dates for the 5 largest tenants (based on net rentable area leased) at each retail, office, industrial and mixed use Mortgaged Property. Even if none of the top 5 tenants at a particular Mortgaged Property have leases that expire before, or shortly after, the maturity of the related Mortgage Loan, there may be a significant percentage of leases at a particular Mortgaged Property that expire in a single calendar year, a rolling 12-month period or prior to, or shortly after, the maturity of a Mortgage Loan. Furthermore, some of the Mortgaged Properties have significant leases or a significant concentration of leases that expire before, or shortly after, the maturity of the related Mortgage Loan. Identified below are certain lease expirations or concentrations of lease expirations with respect to retail, office, industrial and mixed use Mortgaged Properties:

· In certain cases, the lease of a single tenant, major tenant or anchor tenant at a multi-tenanted Mortgaged Property expires prior to the maturity date (or in the case of an ARD Loan, the Anticipated Repayment Date) of the related Mortgage Loan. For example, with respect to the Mortgage Loans secured, in whole or in part, by the Mortgaged Properties identified in the table below, each such Mortgaged Property is occupied by a single tenant under a lease which expires prior to, or in the same month of, the maturity date (or in the case of an ARD Loan, the Anticipated Repayment Date) of the related Mortgage Loan.

Mortgaged Property Name	Percent of the Initial Pool Balance by Allocated Loan Amount	Lease Expiration Date	Maturity Date
Riverwalk Center	0.9%	3/31/2022	8/6/2025
CVS Brandon	0.4%	8/20/2023	9/6/2025
AkzoNobel Coatings	0.3%	6/30/2025	8/6/2025
CVS Paris	0.3%	4/13/2019	9/6/2025
CVS Plano	0.2%	10/26/2016	9/6/2025

S-141

· With respect to the Mortgaged Properties identified in the table below, one or more tenant leases representing in the aggregate 50% or greater of the net rentable square footage at the related Mortgaged Property (excluding Mortgaged Properties leased to a single tenant) expire in a single calendar year that is prior to or the same year as the maturity date (or in the case of an ARD Loan, the Anticipated Repayment Date) of the related Mortgage Loan. There may be other Mortgaged Properties as to which leases representing at least 50% or greater of the net rentable square footage at the related Mortgaged Property expire over several calendar years prior to maturity of the related Mortgage Loan.

Mortgaged Property Name	Percent of the Initial Pool Balance by Allocated Loan Amount	Percentage of Leases Expiring(1)	Calendar Year of Expiration	Maturity Date
Mix at Midtown	2.0%	67.2%	2023	9/6/2025
Stadium Plaza	1.6%	51.0%	2019	8/6/2025
Dover Marketplace	1.2%	82.3%	2021	8/6/2025
Lanier Crossing Shopping Center	1.2%	55.6%	2020	9/1/2025
Village Square Shopping Center	0.6%	71.5%	2021	7/6/2025
210 Bedford Avenue	0.4%	54.6%	2023	8/6/2025
501 East Green Street	0.3%	52.2%	2025	9/1/2025
1801 West Tennessee Street	0.3%	55.2%	2020	9/1/2025
Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)	0.2%	70.1%	2020	8/6/2025

(1) Calculated based on a percentage of net rentable square footage of the related Mortgaged Property.

· In addition, with respect to certain other Mortgaged Properties, there are leases that represent in the aggregate a material portion (but less than 50%) of the net rentable square footage at the related Mortgaged Property that expire in a single calendar year prior to, or shortly after, the maturity of the related Mortgage Loan.

Lease Terminations. Certain Mortgage Loans have material lease early termination options. Leases often give tenants the right to terminate the related lease, abate or reduce the related rent, and/or exercise certain remedies against the related borrower for various reasons or upon various conditions, including

(i) if the borrower for the applicable Mortgaged Property allows uses at the Mortgaged Property in violation of use restrictions in current tenant leases,

(ii) if the borrower or any of its affiliates owns other properties within a certain radius of the Mortgaged Property and allows uses at those properties in violation of use restrictions,

(iii) if the borrower fails to provide a designated number of parking spaces,

(iv) if there is construction at the related Mortgaged Property or an adjacent property (whether or not such adjacent property is owned or controlled by the borrower or any of its affiliates) that may interfere with visibility of, access to or a tenant’s use of the Mortgaged Property or otherwise violate the terms of a tenant’s lease,

(v) upon casualty or condemnation with respect to all or a portion of the Mortgaged Property that renders such Mortgaged Property unsuitable for a tenant’s use or if the borrower fails to rebuild such Mortgaged Property within a certain time,

(vi) if a tenant’s use is not permitted by zoning or applicable law,

(vii) if the tenant is unable to exercise an expansion right,

(viii) if the borrower does not complete certain improvements to the property as contemplated in the lease,

(ix) if the borrower leases space at the Mortgaged Property or within a certain radius of the Mortgaged Property to a competitor,

S-142

(x) if the tenant fails to meet certain sales targets or other business objectives for a specified period of time,

(xi) if certain anchor or significant tenants at the subject property go dark or terminate their leases,

(xii) if the landlord violates the tenant’s exclusive use rights for a specified period of time,

(xiii) if the borrower defaults on any other obligations under the lease, or

(xiv) based upon contingencies other than those set forth in this “—Lease Expirations and Terminations” section.

We cannot assure you that all or any of the borrowers will comply with their lease covenants or such third parties will act in a manner required to avoid any termination and/or abatement rights of the related tenant.

Identified below are certain material termination rights or situations in which the tenant may no longer occupy its leased space or pay full (or any) rent.

Unilateral Lease Termination Rights

Certain of the tenant leases permit the related tenant to unilaterally terminate its lease (with respect to all or at least 20% of its leased net rentable square footage) upon providing notice of such termination within a specified period prior to the termination date. For example, among the 5 largest tenants by net rentable square footage at the Mortgaged Properties securing the 10 largest Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan) by aggregate Cut-off Date Balance, or those Mortgaged Properties with a tenant that leases at least 20% of the net rentable square footage at the related Mortgaged Property (in each case excluding government tenants, which are discussed further below):

· With respect to the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as 111 East Wacker, securing approximately 5.9% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, the second-largest tenant, Combined Insurance Company, representing 9.7% of the net rentable area at the related Mortgaged Property, may terminate all of its leased premises on July 14, 2018 with at least 12 months’ notice and payment of a termination fee.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Greylyn Business Park, representing approximately 3.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the largest tenant, AECOM Technology, representing approximately 6.8% of the net rentable area at the related Mortgaged Property, has a one-time right to terminate its lease in February 2018, provided (i) notice is given by August 2017 and (ii) a termination fee of approximately 13 months’ rent is paid.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Renaissance Faire I, representing approximately 0.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the largest tenant, U.S. Bank, representing approximately 40.1% of the net rentable square footage at the related Mortgaged Property, has the one-time option to partially terminate its lease with respect to approximately 21,985 leased square feet (representing approximately 12.5% of the net rentable square footage at the Mortgaged Property) as of February 29, 2020 with twelve months’ prior written notice and payment of a termination fee of approximately $235,669.

S-143

Rights to Terminate Lease or Abate or Reduce Rent Triggered by Failure to Meet Business Objectives or Actions of Other Tenants

Certain of the tenant leases for the Mortgaged Properties permit the related tenant to terminate its lease and/or abate or reduce rent if the tenant fails to meet certain sales targets or other business objectives for a specified period of time. We cannot assure you that all or any of these tenants will meet the sales targets or business objectives required to avoid any termination and/or abatement rights. For example, taking into account the 5 largest tenants (based on net rentable square footage) at those Mortgaged Properties securing the 20 largest Mortgage Loans (considering the Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan) by aggregate Cut-off Date Balance:

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as University Place, representing approximately 2.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, the fourth largest tenant, TJ Maxx, representing approximately 9.8% of the net rentable area at the related Mortgaged Property, may terminate its lease if its sales are less than $5,000,000 during any of the first 5 years of the lease upon 90 days’ notice within 60 days after November 14, 2015 with payment of a $200,000 termination fee.

Certain of the tenant leases for the Mortgaged Properties may permit affected tenants to terminate their leases and/or abate or reduce rent if another tenant at the subject Mortgaged Property or a tenant at an adjacent or nearby property terminates its lease or goes dark, or if a specified percentage of the Mortgaged Property is unoccupied. For example, taking into account the 5 largest tenants (based on net rentable square footage) at those Mortgaged Properties securing the 20 largest Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan) by aggregate Cut-off Date Balance:

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as University Place, representing approximately 2.9% of the Initial Pool Balance:

(A) Dick’s Sporting Goods, the largest tenant, representing approximately 18.0% of the net rentable square footage of the related Mortgaged Property, may pay reduced rent if 60% of the leasable floor area (excluding the demised premises and outparcels) is not open and continuously operating by certain tenants for more than 180 days. If the failure continues for 18 months following the initial 180-day period, Dick’s Sporting Goods may terminate within 60 days or resume full rent;

(B) TJ Maxx, the fourth largest tenant, representing approximately 9.8% of the net rentable square footage of the related Mortgaged Property, may pay reduced rent if for more than 90 consecutive days (i) 50% of the gross leasable floor area (excluding the demised premises and the stores listed in the following clause (ii)) is not open for business, or (ii) two of the following stores or qualified replacements are not open for business: Dick’s Sporting Goods occupying at least 45,000 sq. ft., Best Buy occupying at least 30,000 sq. ft., Aldi occupying at least 17,000 sq. ft., and Petco occupying at least 15,000 sq. ft. If the failure continues for 455 days following the initial 90-day period, TJ Maxx may terminate within 30 days; and

(C) Petco, the fifth largest tenant, representing approximately 6.0% of the net rentable square footage of the related Mortgaged Property, may pay reduced rent if certain tenants go dark for greater than 60 days during the same period of time, and may terminate with 30 days’ notice within 90 days following expiration of the 18 month period if the related borrower is unable to lease at least 75% of the dark premises within 18 months.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Peckham Square, representing approximately 1.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the fifth largest tenant, Family Dollar, representing approximately 9.0% of the net rentable square footage at the related Mortgaged Property, may pay reduced rent or terminate their respective leases if a specified percentage of such Mortgaged Property is unoccupied or certain tenants go dark.

S-144

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Dover Marketplace, representing approximately 1.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, the fifth largest tenant, Great Clips, representing approximately 2.0% of the net rentable square footage at the related Mortgaged Property, may pay reduced rent or terminate their respective leases if a specified percentage of such Mortgaged Property is unoccupied or certain tenants go dark.

In addition to termination options tied to certain triggers as set forth above that are common with respect to retail properties, certain tenant leases permit the related tenant to terminate its lease without any such triggers.

Certain of the tenant leases permit the related tenant to terminate its lease based upon contingencies other than those set forth above in this “—Rights to Terminate Lease or Abate or Reduce Rent Triggered by Failure to Meet Business Objectives or Actions of Other Tenants” subsection.

See “Structural and Collateral Term Sheet” in Annex B to this prospectus supplement for more information on material lease termination options relating to the largest 20 Mortgage Loans.

Rights to Cease Operations (Go Dark) at the Leased Property

Certain of the tenant leases may permit a tenant to go dark at any time. For example, taking into account (i) the 5 largest tenants (based on net rentable square footage) at those Mortgaged Properties securing the largest 20 Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan) by aggregate Cut-off Date Balance or (ii) cases where any Mortgaged Property is leased to a single tenant who has the option to go dark:

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as University Place, representing approximately 2.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, the following tenants have the right to go dark as follows:

(A) Dick’s Sporting Goods, the largest tenant, representing approximately 18.0% of the net rentable square footage of the related Mortgaged Property, has the right to go dark with a landlord right of recapture after 180 days; and

(B) Petco, the fifth largest tenant, representing approximately 6.0% of the net rentable square footage of the related Mortgaged Property, has the right to go dark with a landlord right of recapture after receipt of the “go dark” notice.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Stadium Plaza, representing approximately 1.6% of the Initial Pool Balance, the following tenants have the right to go dark as follows:

(A) Hobby Lobby, the largest tenant representing 49.4% of the net rentable square footage, has the right to go dark with a landlord right of recapture after 60 days;

(B) Best Buy, the second largest tenant, representing 35.3% of the net rentable square footage, has the right to go dark with a landlord right of recapture after 90 days;

(C) Texas Roadhouse, the third largest tenant, representing 9.1% of the net rentable square footage, has the right to go dark with a landlord right of recapture after 180 days; and

(D) Sally Beauty, the fifth largest tenant, representing 1.6% of the net rentable square footage, has the right to go dark with a landlord right of recapture after 60 days.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Dover Marketplace, representing approximately 1.2% of the Initial Pool Balance, the largest tenant, Giant Foods, representing approximately 73.3% of the net rentable square footage of the related Mortgaged Property, may go dark at any time with at least 30 days’ notice. Upon receipt of the tenant’s notice, the landlord may terminate the lease with 90 days’ notice.

S-145

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Solomon CVS Portfolio, representing approximately 0.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the following tenants have the right to go dark as follows:

(A) CVS in Brandon, Mississippi, the largest tenant in the portfolio (and the sole tenant at CVS Brandon), representing 36.9% of the net rentable square footage, has the right to go dark without a landlord right of recapture;

(B) CVS in Paris, Texas, the second largest tenant in the portfolio (and the sole tenant at CVS Paris), representing 34.0% of the net rentable square footage, has the right to go dark with a landlord right of recapture after 180 days; and

(C) CVS in Plano, Texas, the third largest tenant in the portfolio (and the sole tenant at CVS Plano), representing 29.1% of the net rentable square footage, has the right to go dark with a landlord right of recapture after 90 days.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as 4238 West Hundred Road, representing approximately 0.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the sole tenant, Walgreens, may go dark at any time.

There may be other tenant leases, other than those disclosed above, that do not require the related tenant to continue to operate its space at the related Mortgaged Property, and therefore such tenants may also have the option to go dark at any time, but such right to go dark is not expressly provided for under the subject lease.

Termination Rights of Government Sponsored Tenants

Certain of the Mortgaged Properties, as set forth in the table below, may be leased in whole or in part by government sponsored tenants. Government sponsored tenants frequently have the right to cancel their leases at any time or after a specific time (in some cases after the delivery of notice) or for lack of appropriations. For example, set forth below are certain government leases that (i) have these types of risks, and (ii) relate to a tenant that individually represents more than 5% of the base rent at the related Mortgaged Property. One or more other leases at the related Mortgaged Property representing less than 5% of the base rent at such property could also have these types of risks.

Mortgaged Property Name	% of Initial Pool Balance	Tenant	% of Net Rentable Area	% of Base Rent
Park View Business Center	1.2%	Secretary of State(1)	6.0%	7.8%
Park View Business Center	1.2%	IL Dept of Human Services(2)	5.2%	6.6%

(1)      The tenant may terminate its lease at any time upon 90 days’ written notice.

(2)     The tenant may terminate its lease at any time upon 90 days’ written notice.

Other Tenant Termination Issues

In addition, anchor tenants at, and shadow anchor tenants with respect to, certain Mortgaged Properties may close or otherwise become vacant. We cannot assure you that any such anchor tenants would be replaced in a timely manner or without incurring material additional costs to the related borrower and resulting in adverse economic effects.

Rights to Sublease

Certain of the Mortgaged Properties may have tenants that sublet a portion of their space or have provided notice of their intent to sublet out a portion of their space in the future.

S-146

Tenants Not Yet in Occupancy or Paying Rent, Leases Under Negotiation and LOIs

Tenants under certain leases included in the Underwritten Net Cash Flow, Underwritten Net Operating Income and/or Occupancy may not be in physical occupancy, may not have commenced paying rent or may be in the process of negotiating such lease. For example, with respect to single tenant properties or tenants that are one of the top 5 tenants by net rentable square footage at a Mortgaged Property or tenants individually or in the aggregate representing more than 25% of the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property, certain of such tenants have not taken possession or commenced paying rent as set forth below:

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Waterway Shoppes II, representing approximately 1.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, the largest tenant, Sage Dental (“Sage Dental”), representing approximately 11.4% of the net rentable square footage at the related Mortgaged Property, has executed a lease on its space and is expected to take occupancy on or about November 1, 2015 and commence paying rent on or about May 1, 2016 (six (6) months after the delivery of possession of the premises). In the event that possession of the premises has not been delivered to Sage Dental on or prior to December 28, 2015, Sage Dental will have the right to terminate the lease by delivering notice to the borrower. Additionally, the third largest tenant, Watermark Realty, Inc, dba Berkshire Hathaway Home Services Florida Realty, representing approximately 10.2% of the net rentable square footage at the related Mortgaged Property, has an executed lease amendment to expand and relocate but has not yet taken occupancy or begun paying rent on the additional space. The tenant is expected to take occupancy of the additional space on or before November 1, 2015, and commence paying rent on the additional space on or about May 1, 2016. Until such time, the tenant will continue paying rent under the current lease. Upon completion of the expansion, the tenant is expected to be the largest tenant at the Mortgaged Property.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as AkzoNobel Coatings, representing approximately 0.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the sole tenant, AkzoNobel Coatings, Inc., has executed a lease on its space and is expected to be in occupancy in September 2015.

In addition, in some cases, tenants at a Mortgaged Property may have signed a letter of intent but not executed a lease with respect to the related space. We cannot assure you that any such proposed tenant will sign a lease or take occupancy at the related Mortgaged Property.

In addition, the underwritten occupancy, Underwritten Net Cash Flow and Underwritten Net Operating Income of the Mortgaged Properties may reflect tenants, and rents from tenants, whose lease terms or renewal leases are under negotiation but not yet signed. In addition, certain of the Mortgage Loans may have tenants who are leasing their spaces on a month-to-month basis and have the right to terminate their leases on a monthly basis. For example, with respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as The Decoration & Design Building, representing approximately 6.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, approximately 2.6% of the net rentable area is leased to tenants on a month-to-month basis.

In these cases we cannot assure you that these tenants will take occupancy, begin paying rent or execute these leases. If these tenants do not take occupancy of the leased space, begin paying rent or execute these leases, it could result in a higher vacancy rate and re-leasing costs that may adversely affect cash flow on the related Mortgage Loan.

Tenants in Financial Distress or Affiliated with a Parent or Related to a Chain That Is in Financial Distress

In addition, tenants under certain leases included in the Underwritten Net Cash Flow, Underwritten Net Operating Income and/or Occupancy may be in financial distress, or may be part of a chain that is in financial distress as a whole, or the tenant’s parent company may have implemented or expressed an intent to implement a plan to consolidate or reorganize its operations, close a number of stores in the chain, reduce exposure, relocate stores or otherwise reorganize its business to cut costs.

Furthermore, commercial tenants having multiple leases may experience adverse business conditions that result in their deciding to close under-performing stores.

S-147

On October 20, 2014, Walgreen Co. (“Walgreens”) announced it closed 67 stores during fiscal year 2014 and is pursuing a cost reduction initiative with the goal of realizing $1 billion in cost savings by fiscal year 2017. On April 9, 2015, Walgreens announced plans to close 200 stores as part of a $500 million cost-cutting measure. In the case of the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as 4238 West Hundred Road, securing approximately 0.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, Walgreens is a tenant at the Mortgaged Property. We cannot assure you that Walgreens will remain open for business or that the closing of any other Walgreens store will not impact other Mortgaged Properties securing Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool.

On February 5, 2015, RadioShack Corporation (“RadioShack”) filed a bankruptcy petition under chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. RadioShack also announced its intention to sell between 1,500 and 2,400 stores and close the remainder of its stores as part of a restructuring process. RadioShack released a preliminary list of 1,784 stores slated for closure. In the case of the Mortgage Loan secured in part by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Stadium Plaza, representing approximately 1.6% of the Initial Pool Balance, RadioShack is a tenant at the Mortgaged Property. We cannot assure you that RadioShack will remain open for business or that the closing of any other RadioShack store will not impact other Mortgaged Properties securing Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool.

On March 29, 2012, Best Buy announced its plan to close 50 of its U.S. stores in 2013 and cut $800 million in costs by 2015. In the case of the Mortgage Loans, secured by the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as University Place and Stadium Plaza, representing approximately 2.9% and 1.6%, respectively, of the Initial Pool Balance, Best Buy is a tenant at the related Mortgaged Property. We cannot assure you that Best Buy will remain open for business or that the closing of any Best Buy store will not impact other Mortgaged Properties securing Mortgage Loans in the Mortgage Pool.

Not For Profit Tenants

Certain Mortgaged Properties may have tenants or sub-tenants that are charitable institutions that generally rely on contributions from individuals and government grants or other subsidies to pay rent on such space and other operating expenses. For example:

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Westgate Plaza, representing approximately 0.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the largest tenant, Mark Thomas Ministries, representing approximately 28.7% of the net rentable square footage at such Mortgaged Property, is a not for profit entity.

Tenants that are charitable institutions that generally rely on contributions from individuals and government grants or other subsidies to pay rent on such space and other operating expenses may default upon their respective leases should such contributions, grants or subsidies no longer be available.

See “Structural and Collateral Term Sheet” in Annex B to this prospectus supplement for more information on other tenant matters relating to the largest 20 Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan).

See the footnotes to Annex A to this prospectus supplement for further information regarding the 5 largest tenants by net rentable square footage at the Mortgaged Properties.

Purchase Options, Rights of First Offer and Rights of First Refusal

Below are certain purchase options, rights of first offer and rights of first refusal to purchase all or a portion of certain Mortgaged Properties:

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hammons Hotel Portfolio, representing approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, JD Holdings, L.L.C. has (i) a right of first refusal to purchase the Mortgaged Properties if there is a proposed transfer of such Mortgaged Properties and (ii) a right to purchase the Mortgaged Properties upon the redemption (or other disposition) of the preferred interest of the John Q. Hammons Revocable Trust in the Hotel Limited Partnership, which redemption is subject to litigation described under “—Litigation Considerations” in this prospectus

S-148

supplement. In addition, Marriott International, Inc., the franchisor, has a right of first refusal to purchase the Mortgaged Property identified as Renaissance Glendale, AZ if there is a proposed transfer of such Mortgaged Property to a competitor.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio, representing approximately 2.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, each of the single tenants at each of the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Dale Avenue Roanoke, Plantation Road Walmart and Walmart Orange Avenue possess a right of first refusal (“ROFR”) exercisable upon the proposed sale of the Mortgaged Property by the related borrower, the related lender, or any purchaser at a foreclosure sale. The ROFR is not exercisable upon a foreclosure sale or a transfer in lieu of foreclosure.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Riverwalk Center, representing approximately 0.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, the sole tenant at the Mortgaged Property, GenSpring Holdings, Inc., has a right of first offer (“ROFO”) to purchase the Mortgaged Property in the event the related borrower offers to sell the Mortgaged Property. The ROFO does not apply in connection with a foreclosure sale or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Renaissance Faire I, representing approximately 0.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the second largest tenant, Weigel Broadcasting, which leases approximately 16.3% of the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property, has a right of first offer to purchase its leased premises at the related Mortgaged Property within 60 days following the borrower’s notice to the tenant of its intention to partition the Mortgaged Property into condominium units for sale to third parties. The related Mortgage Loan documents prohibit the related borrower from partitioning the Mortgaged Property or selling the Mortgaged Property without the lender’s consent (not to be unreasonably withheld in the case of a sale).

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as University Retail Portfolio, securing approximately 1.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, the largest tenant, The Trustees of Indiana University, at the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as 517 Kirkwood Avenue, which leases approximately 74.9% of the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property and approximately 47.3% of the net rentable area of the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties, has a right of first refusal to purchase the related Mortgaged Property within thirty (30) days following the borrower’s notice to the tenant of its receipt of a bona fide offer from a third party to purchase the Mortgaged Property (the “Indiana University ROFR”). The Indiana University ROFR does not apply in connection with a foreclosure or a transfer immediately following a foreclosure.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as AkzoNobel Coatings, representing approximately 0.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the sole tenant, AkzoNobel Coatings, Inc., has a right of first offer to purchase the Mortgaged Property in the event the related borrower determines its desire to sell or offer to sell all or any portion of the leased premises. The lessee has the right to indicate its interest within fifteen (15) days after receipt of written notice of intent to sell from the borrower. Such right of first refusal does not apply in the case of a foreclosure sale or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure with respect to such Mortgaged Property.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as 4238 West Hundred Road, representing approximately 0.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the sole tenant, Walgreens, has a right of first refusal to purchase the Mortgaged Property within 10 days following its receipt of notice from the borrower setting forth the terms and conditions of a bona fide third party offer to purchase the Mortgaged Property. The right of first refusal does not apply in connection with a foreclosure, but does, however, apply to subsequent purchasers of the Mortgaged Property.

S-149

Affiliated Leases

Certain of the Mortgaged Properties are leased in whole or in part by borrowers or borrower affiliates. Set forth below are examples of Mortgaged Properties at which at least 5.0% of (i) the gross income at the Mortgaged Property relates to leases between the borrower and an affiliate of the borrower or (ii) the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property is leased to an affiliate of the borrower:

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Scott’s Edge Apartments, representing approximately 0.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, such Mortgaged Property is subject to a master lease between the related borrower and an affiliate of such borrower.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Glades Tower II, representing approximately 0.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, R&R Real Estate Group, LLC, a borrower-affiliated real estate brokerage company, occupies approximately 8.2% of the net rentable area at the Mortgaged Property.

Other Mortgaged Properties may have tenants that are affiliated with the related borrower but those tenants do not represent more than 5.0% of the gross income or net rentable area of the related Mortgaged Property.

Insurance Considerations

In the case of 61 Mortgaged Properties, which secure, in whole or in part, 37 Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 71.8% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, the related borrower maintains insurance under blanket policies.

Further, certain Mortgaged Properties may be insured, in whole or in part, by a sole or significant tenant. For example:

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio, representing approximately 2.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrowers at each Mortgaged Property are permitted to rely on the insurance obtained by the sole tenants at each Mortgaged Property, Walmart, to satisfy the insurance requirements relating to the Mortgaged Property.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as AkzoNobel Coatings, representing approximately 0.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related borrower is permitted to rely on the insurance obtained by the sole tenant, AkzoNobel Coatings, Inc., to satisfy the insurance requirements relating to the Mortgaged Property.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as 4238 West Hundred Road, representing approximately 0.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the sole tenant, Walgreens, is required to insure (or self-insure) the Mortgaged Property pursuant to its lease, and the related borrower is permitted to rely on such insurance or self-insurance.

In addition, with respect to certain Mortgage Loans, the insurable value of the related Mortgaged Property as of the origination date of the related Mortgage Loan was lower than the principal balance of the related Mortgage Loan.

See “Risk Factors—Risks Associated with Blanket Insurance Policies or Self-Insurance” and “—Earthquake, Flood and Other Insurance May Not be Available or Adequate” in this prospectus supplement.

In addition, with respect to Mortgaged Properties that are part of condominium regimes, the insurance may be maintained by the condominium association rather than the related borrower.

S-150

Further, many Mortgage Loans contain limitations on the obligation to obtain terrorism insurance. See “Risk Factors—Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties” in this prospectus supplement.

Zoning and Use Restrictions

Certain of the Mortgaged Properties are subject to restrictions that restrict the use of the Mortgaged Properties to their current use. In addition, certain of the Mortgaged Properties may be subject to restrictions relating to their current use or have other zoning issues. For example, certain of the Mortgaged Properties are subject to a temporary certificate of occupancy (the “TCO”). The related Mortgage Loan documents require the related borrower to use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain the TCO, or cause the sponsor of the property to maintain the TCO, and to cause the TCO to be continuously renewed at all times until a permanent certificate of occupancy (“PCO”) is obtained for the related Mortgaged Property.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Somerset Park Apartments, representing approximately 3.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the portion of the Mortgaged Property that is used as a golf course is legal non-conforming. In the event the golf course is not used for 180 days or more, the related mortgagor would be required to obtain a special use approval to comply with zoning.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Cherry Creek, representing approximately 0.5% of the Initial Pool Balance, the sixth largest tenant by net rentable area (approximately 4.8%) and largest tenant by underwritten base rent (approximately 16.1%) is Bank of America, which use as a bank is a legal non-conforming use. Bank of America is currently operating under a special use permit until such time as the use as a bank is discontinued for a period exceeding 180 days. Under the local zoning laws, following a casualty, the borrower is permitted to rebuild the Mortgaged Property to its current use provided the casualty does not exceed of 50% of the total replacement value, based on either a sale within the previous year, an appraisal within the last two (2) years, or the amount for which the Mortgaged Property was insured prior to the date of the damage or destruction. To the extent the casualty is greater than 50% of the replacement value, the Mortgaged Property will be required to be rebuilt in strict conformity with the applicable zoning code and the current bank use will not be permitted.

With respect to the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as 517 Kirkwood Avenue, securing approximately 0.5% of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, the Mortgaged Property was named as an “outstanding” significant historic property by the Bloomington Historic Preservation Commission (the “Commission”), and as a result, material exterior changes to the Mortgaged Property will require the review of the Commission. We cannot assure you that this designation will not impact such Mortgaged Property’s value or ability to undergo material development or construction in the future.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Glades Tower II, representing approximately 0.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Mortgaged Property is subject to condominium association restrictions which require that 75.0% of the net rentable area be occupied by medical, dental or other health related tenants. Additionally, business and professional uses at the Mortgaged Property are conditionally permitted under the zoning code subject to approval by the City of Boca Raton.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Maximum Self Storage, representing approximately 0.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, a portion of the Mortgaged Property is occupied by office and retail tenants, which uses are legally nonconforming. Under local zoning laws, following a casualty, the borrower is permitted to rebuild the Mortgaged Property to its current use provided the casualty does not exceed 50% of the replacement cost of the Mortgaged Property. To the extent the casualty is greater than 50% of the replacement cost of the Mortgaged Property, the Mortgaged Property will be required to be rebuilt in strict conformity with the applicable zoning code, and the current office and retail uses will not be permitted.

See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Zoning Non-Compliance and Use Restrictions” in this prospectus supplement. See also the Sponsor representation and warranty set forth in paragraph (24) (Local Law Compliance) on Annex E-1 to this prospectus supplement and any related exceptions on Annex E-2 to this prospectus supplement (subject to the limitations and qualifications set forth in the preamble to Annex E-1 to this prospectus supplement).

S-151

Appraised Value

In certain cases, appraisals may reflect both “as stabilized” and “as-is” appraised values, although the Appraised Value reflected in this prospectus supplement with respect to each Mortgaged Property reflects only the “as-is” appraised value, which may be based on certain assumptions, such as future construction completion, projected re-tenanting or increased tenant occupancies, other than as follows:

· With respect to the loan-to-value ratios at maturity of 20 Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged Properties or portfolios of Mortgaged Properties identified in the definitions of “LTV Ratio at Maturity” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in this prospectus supplement, the related LTV Ratio at Maturity reflected in this prospectus supplement is calculated using an “as stabilized” appraised value.

· Appraised Values are further calculated based on certain other assumptions and considerations set forth in the definition of “Appraised Value” under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in this prospectus supplement, including, without limitation: with respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hammons Hotel Portfolio, representing approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Appraised Value represents the aggregate “as-is” appraised value of $363,750,000 plus a $3,570,502 capital deduction related to franchise mandated capital improvements at three Mortgaged Properties for which the borrowers reserved $7,890,000 for the estimated mandatory and additional elective capital improvement costs.

See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” and “Risk Factors—Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property” in this prospectus supplement.

Non-Recourse Carveout Limitations

While the Mortgage Loans generally contain non-recourse carveouts for liabilities such as a result of fraud by the borrower, certain voluntary insolvency proceedings or other matters, certain of the Mortgage Loans do not contain such carveouts, contain limitations to such carveouts and/or do not provide for a non-recourse carveout guarantor. Certain other Mortgage Loans may have additional limitations to the non-recourse carveouts as described on Annex E-2 to this prospectus supplement. See “Risk Factors—Mortgage Loans Are Non-Recourse and Are Not Insured or Guaranteed” in this prospectus supplement.

We cannot assure you that the net worth or liquidity of any non-recourse guarantor under any of the Mortgage Loans will be sufficient to satisfy any claims against that guarantor under its non-recourse guaranty. In most cases, the liquidity and net worth of a non-recourse guarantor under a Mortgage Loan will be less, and may be materially less, than the outstanding principal amount of that Mortgage Loan. In addition, there may be impediments and/or difficulties in enforcing some or all of the non-recourse carveout liability obligations of individual guarantors depending on, among other things, the domicile or citizenship of any such guarantor.

The non-recourse carveout provisions contained in certain of the Mortgage Loan documents may also limit the liability of the non-recourse carveout guarantor for certain monetary obligations or covenants related to the use and operation of the Mortgaged Property to the extent that there is sufficient cash flow generated by the Mortgaged Property and made available to the related borrower and/or non-recourse carveout guarantor to take or prevent such required action.

Real Estate and Other Tax Considerations

Below are descriptions of real estate and/or tax matters relating to certain Mortgaged Properties. Certain risks relating to real estate taxes regarding the Mortgaged Properties or the borrowers are described in “Risk Factors—Increases in Real Estate Taxes May Reduce Available Funds” in this prospectus supplement.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Somerset Park Apartments, representing approximately 3.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, a small and unimproved portion of the Mortgaged Property (the “Orphan Parcel”), has not been and is not currently assessed for taxes. The related mortgagor is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to

S-152

cause the Orphan Parcel to be assessed for taxes, whether by causing the City of Troy to (i) create a new separate tax parcel for the Orphan Parcel, or (ii) incorporate the Orphan Parcel into the existing tax parcel. The related mortgagor and guarantor are liable for losses related to any failure to pay taxes with respect to the Orphan Parcel until such time that the Orphan Parcel assessment is completed and any taxes (including, interest and penalties) due and owing for the Orphan Parcel for the time period prior to the Orphan Parcel assessment are paid in full.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Avenue District Apartments, representing approximately 1.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, the Mortgaged Property benefits from a 15 year tax abatement, which began in 2008 and runs through 2023, pursuant to which 100% of taxes on building improvements are abated. Full taxes will be payable beginning in 2024, at which time taxes will increase from $102,607, which is the portion attributable to land. The appraiser estimated full, unabated and stabilized taxes to be $449,433.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Scott’s Edge Apartments, representing approximately 0.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, such Mortgaged Property benefits from a 10-year tax abatement program pursuant to which the increase in market value caused by the Mortgaged Property’s rehabilitation will be excluded from the taxable assessment in full for seven years (from 2015 to 2021) and will thereafter be phased in over the course of three years (from 2022 to 2024). Underwritten real estate taxes are based on the Mortgaged Property’s unabated tax liability.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Glenville Target Center, representing approximately 0.5% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgaged Property is currently subject to a PILOT program providing for partial tax exemption; however, such program is personal to the related borrower and the benefits thereof do not run to the related lender or any purchaser in foreclosure. There can be no assurance that a similar program would be available in the event of foreclosure or transfer in lieu of foreclosure to the subsequent owner.

Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans

Due Dates; Mortgage Loan Rates; Calculations of Interest

Subject in some cases to a next business day convention, all of the Mortgage Loans have due dates upon which interest and/or principal payments are due under the related Mortgage Note (each such date, a “Due Date”) that occur as described in the following table with the indicated grace period.

Due Date	Default Grace Period Days	Number of Mortgage Loans	% of Initial Pool Balance
6	0	61	97.1%
1	5	3	2.9
Total		64	100.0%

As used in this prospectus supplement, “grace period” is the number of days before a payment default is an event of default under the terms of each Mortgage Loan. See Annex A to this prospectus supplement for information on the number of days before late payment charges are due under the Mortgage Loan. The information on Annex A to this prospectus supplement regarding the number of days before a late payment charge is due is based on the express terms of the Mortgage Loans. Some jurisdictions may impose a statutorily longer period.

All of the Mortgage Loans are secured by first liens on fee simple and/or leasehold interests in the related Mortgaged Properties, subject to the permitted exceptions reflected in the related title insurance policy. All of the Mortgage Loans bear fixed interest rates.

All of the Mortgage Loans accrue interest on the basis of the actual number of days in a month, assuming a 360-day year (“Actual/360 Basis”).

Five (5) of the Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 13.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, provide for monthly payments of interest-only until the related maturity date or Anticipated Repayment Date, as applicable (the “Interest Only Mortgage Loans”).

S-153

Each of the remaining 59 Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 86.6%, in the aggregate, of the Initial Pool Balance, provides for monthly payments of principal and interest based on amortization schedules significantly longer than the remaining terms to maturity for such Mortgage Loans (those 59 Mortgage Loans, together with the Interest Only Mortgage Loans, the “Balloon Mortgage Loans”). Thirty-eight (38) of these 59 Mortgage Loans referenced in the preceding sentence, representing approximately 58.2%, in the aggregate, of the Initial Pool Balance, provide for monthly payments of interest-only for a period of 12 months to 69 months following the related origination date and then amortize for the remainder of their loan term. The remaining 21 of these 59 Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 28.4%, in the aggregate, of the Initial Pool Balance, amortize for their entire loan term. Included in such 21 Mortgage Loans is the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Greylyn Business Park, which represents approximately 3.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, that amortizes based on the non-standard amortization schedule set forth on Annex G to this prospectus supplement.

Each Balloon Mortgage Loan will have a balloon payment due at its related maturity date or Anticipated Repayment Date, as applicable, unless prepaid prior thereto.

ARD Loans

An “ARD Loan” is a Mortgage Loan that provides that, after a certain date (an “Anticipated Repayment Date”), if the related borrower has not prepaid such Mortgage Loan in full, any principal outstanding on that date will accrue interest at an increased interest rate (the “Revised Rate”) rather than the original Mortgage Loan Rate (the “Initial Rate”) for such Mortgage Loan. Annex A to this prospectus supplement will set forth the Anticipated Repayment Date and the Revised Rate for each ARD Loan (if any). “Excess Interest” with respect to each ARD Loan is the interest accrued at the related Revised Rate in respect of such ARD Loan in excess of the interest accrued at the related Initial Rate (and, to the extent permitted by applicable law and the related Mortgage Loan documents, any compound interest thereon).

After the related Anticipated Repayment Date, each ARD Loan further requires that all cash flow available from the related Mortgaged Property after payment of the monthly debt service payments required under the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents, all escrows and other amounts then due and payable (other than Excess Interest) under the related Mortgage Loan documents and certain budgeted or non-budgeted expenses approved by the related lender be applied toward the payment of principal (without payment of any yield maintenance charge or other prepayment premium) on such ARD Loan. While interest at the Initial Rate continues to accrue and be payable on a current basis on each ARD Loan after the related Anticipated Repayment Date, the payment of Excess Interest will be deferred and will be required to be paid (if and to the extent permitted under applicable law and the related Mortgage Loan documents), only after the outstanding principal balance of such ARD Loan has been paid in full, at which time the Excess Interest, to the extent actually collected, will be paid to the holders of any certificates evidencing an interest in such Excess Interest (if applicable). Additionally, if there are any ARD Loans included in the Issuing Entity, an account was established in connection with the origination of each ARD Loan into which rents or other revenues from the related Mortgaged Property are required to be deposited, although the related borrower is entitled to receive remittances of funds daily unless an event of default or cash flow trigger is in effect or the related Anticipated Repayment Date has occurred.

The foregoing features, to the extent applicable, are designed to increase the likelihood that each ARD Loan will be prepaid by the related borrower on or about its related Anticipated Repayment Date. However, we cannot assure you that the ARD Loan will be prepaid on its Anticipated Repayment Date.

There are no ARD Loans included in the Issuing Entity and, accordingly, no Excess Interest is payable with respect to the Issuing Entity, no certificates will be issued that represent an interest in any Excess Interest and all references in this prospectus supplement to ARD Loans, Anticipated Repayment Dates, Excess Interest and Excess Interest Distribution Account, should be disregarded.

Single-Purpose Entity Covenants

The terms of certain of the Mortgage Loans require that the borrowers be single-purpose entities and, in most cases, such borrowers’ organizational documents or the terms of the Mortgage Loans limit their activities to the ownership of only the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties and limit the borrowers’ ability to incur additional indebtedness. Such provisions are designed to mitigate the possibility that the borrower’s financial

S-154

condition would be adversely impacted by factors unrelated to the related Mortgaged Property and Mortgage Loan. That borrower may also have previously owned property other than the related Mortgaged Property or may be a so-called “recycled” single-purpose entity that previously had other business activities and liabilities. However, in many cases such borrowers are not required to observe all covenants and conditions which typically are required in order for such borrowers to be viewed under standard rating agency criteria as “special purpose entities.”

The organizational documents of a borrower or the direct or indirect managing partner or member of a borrower may also contain requirements that there be one or two independent directors, managers or trustees (depending on the entity form of such borrower) whose vote is required before the borrower files a voluntary bankruptcy or insolvency petition or otherwise institutes insolvency proceedings. Generally, but not always, the independent directors, managers or trustees may only be replaced with certain other independent successors. Although the requirement of having independent directors, managers or trustees is designed to mitigate the risk of a voluntary bankruptcy filing by a solvent borrower, a borrower could file for bankruptcy without obtaining the consent of its independent director(s) (and we cannot assure you that such bankruptcy would be dismissed as an unauthorized filing), and in any case the independent directors, managers or trustees may determine that a bankruptcy filing is an appropriate course of action to be taken by such borrower. Although the independent directors, managers or trustees generally owe no fiduciary duties to entities other than the borrower itself, such determination might take into account the interests and financial condition of such borrower’s parent entities and such parent entities’ other subsidiaries in addition to those of the borrower. Consequently, the financial distress of an affiliate of a borrower might increase the likelihood of a bankruptcy filing by a borrower. In any event, we cannot assure you that a borrower will not file for bankruptcy protection or that creditors of a borrower will not initiate a bankruptcy or similar proceeding against such borrower or that if initiated, a bankruptcy case of the borrower could be dismissed. For example, there are certain Mortgage Loans for which there is no independent director, manager or trustee in place with respect to the related borrower.

In all cases, the terms of the borrowers’ organizational documents or the terms of the Mortgage Loans limit the borrower’s activities to the ownership of only the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties and related activities, and limit the borrowers’ ability to incur additional indebtedness, other than certain trade debt, equipment financing and other unsecured debt relating to property operations, and other than subordinated debt permitted under the related Mortgage Loan documents. See “—Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans—Additional Indebtedness” above. Such provisions are designed to mitigate the possibility that the borrower’s financial condition would be adversely impacted by factors unrelated to the related Mortgaged Property and Mortgage Loan. However, we cannot assure you that such borrowers have in the past complied and will comply with such requirements, and in some cases unsecured debt exists and/or is allowed in the future. See “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Issues” in the prospectus.

Prepayment Protections and Certain Involuntary Prepayments

All of the Mortgage Loans have a degree of voluntary prepayment protection in the form of defeasance provisions, prepayment lockout provisions and/or yield maintenance provisions. Voluntary prepayments, if permitted, generally require the payment of a yield maintenance charge or a prepayment premium unless the Mortgage Loan (or Loan Combination, if applicable) is prepaid within a specified period (ranging from approximately 3 to 7 payments) up to and including the related maturity date or Anticipated Repayment Date, as applicable. See Annex A to this prospectus supplement for more information on the prepayment protections attributable to the Mortgage Loans on a loan-by-loan basis.

Additionally, certain Mortgage Loans may provide that in the event of the exercise of a purchase option by a tenant or the sale of real property or the release of a portion of the Mortgaged Property, that the related Mortgage Loans may be prepaid in part prior to the expiration of a prepayment/defeasance lockout provision. See “—Partial Releases” below.

Generally, no yield maintenance charge will be required for prepayments in connection with a casualty or condemnation unless, in the case of most of the Mortgage Loans, an event of default has occurred and is continuing. We cannot assure you that the obligation to pay any yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium will be enforceable. See “Risk Factors—Some Provisions in the Mortgage Loans Underlying Your Offered Certificates May Be Challenged as Being Unenforceable—Prepayment Premiums, Fees and Charges” in the prospectus. In addition, certain of the Mortgage Loans permit the related borrower, after a total or partial casualty or partial condemnation, to prepay the remaining principal balance of the Mortgage Loan (after

S-155

application of the related insurance proceeds or condemnation award to pay the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan), which may not be accompanied by any prepayment consideration.

Certain of the Mortgage Loans are secured in part by letters of credit and/or cash reserves that in each such case:

· will be released to the related borrower upon satisfaction by the related borrower of certain performance related conditions, which may include, in some cases, meeting debt service coverage ratio levels and/or satisfying leasing conditions; and

· if not so released, may, at the discretion of the lender, prior to loan maturity (or earlier loan default or loan acceleration), be drawn on and/or applied to prepay the subject Mortgage Loan if such performance related conditions are not satisfied within specified time periods.

See Annex A to this prospectus supplement and “Structural and Collateral Term Sheet” in Annex B to this prospectus supplement for more information on reserves relating to the largest 20 Mortgage Loans.

“Due-On-Sale” and “Due-On-Encumbrance” Provisions

The Mortgage Loans generally contain “due-on-sale” and “due-on-encumbrance” clauses, which in each case permit the holder of the Mortgage Loan to accelerate the maturity of the Mortgage Loan if the borrower sells or otherwise transfers or encumbers (subject to certain exceptions set forth in the related Mortgage Loan documents) the related Mortgaged Property or a controlling interest in the borrower without the consent of the mortgagee (which, in some cases, may not be unreasonably withheld). Many of the Mortgage Loans place certain restrictions (subject to certain exceptions set forth in the related Mortgage Loan documents) on the transfer and/or pledging of general partnership and managing member equity interests in a borrower such as specific percentage or control limitations. The terms of the mortgages generally permit, subject to certain limitations, affiliate, estate planning and family transfers, transfers at death, transfers of interest in a public company, the transfer or pledge of less than a controlling portion of the partnership, members’ or other equity interests in a borrower, the transfer or pledge of passive equity interests in a borrower (such as limited partnership interests and non-managing member interests in a limited liability company) and transfers to persons satisfying qualification criteria set forth in the related Mortgage Loan documents. Certain of the Mortgage Loans do not restrict the pledging of direct or indirect ownership interests in the related borrower, but do restrict the transfer of ownership interests in the related borrower by imposing a specific percentage, a control limitation or requiring the consent of the mortgagee to any such transfer. Generally, the Mortgage Loans do not prohibit transfers of non-controlling interests so long as no change of control results or, with respect to Mortgage Loans to tenant-in-common borrowers, transfers to new tenant-in-common borrowers. Certain of the Mortgage Loans do not prohibit the pledge by direct or indirect owners of the related borrower of equity distributions that may be made from time to time by the borrower to its equity owners.

Additionally, certain of the Mortgage Loans provide that transfers of the Mortgaged Property are permitted if certain conditions are satisfied, which may include one or more of the following:

· no event of default has occurred;

· the proposed transferee is creditworthy and has sufficient experience in the ownership and management of properties similar to the Mortgaged Property;

· a Rating Agency Confirmation has been obtained from each Rating Agency;

· the transferee has executed and delivered an assumption agreement evidencing its agreement to abide by the terms of the Mortgage Loan together with legal opinions and title insurance endorsements; and

· the assumption fee has been received (which assumption fee will be applied as described under “Transaction Parties—Servicing Compensation, Operating Advisor Compensation and Payment of Expenses” in this prospectus supplement, but will in no event be paid to the Certificateholders);

S-156

however, certain of the Mortgage Loans allow the borrower to sell or otherwise transfer the related Mortgaged Property a limited number of times without paying an assumption fee.

Transfers resulting from the foreclosure of a pledge of the collateral for a mezzanine loan (if any) or other permitted pledge of borrower interest or a preferred equity investment (if any) will also result in a permitted transfer. See “—Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans—Additional Indebtedness” above.

The Pooling and Servicing Agreement will provide that (a) with respect to Specially Serviced Loans, the Special Servicer will be required to process and determine, in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard, and (b) with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans, the Special Servicer will be required to process and determine, in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard or, if mutually agreed to by the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer, the Master Servicer will be required to process and determine (subject to the consent of the Special Servicer) in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard, whether to exercise any right the mortgagee may have under any such clause to accelerate payment of the related Serviced Loan upon, or to withhold its consent to, any transfer of interests in the borrower or the Mortgaged Property or further encumbrances of the related Mortgaged Property, subject to any approval rights of the applicable Directing Holder or its representative to any waiver of any such clause. See “Risk Factors—Some Provisions in the Mortgage Loans Underlying Your Offered Certificates May Be Challenged as Being Unenforceable—Due-on-Sale and Debt Acceleration Clauses” and “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Due-on-Sale and Due-on-Encumbrance Provisions” in the prospectus. The Depositor makes no representation as to the enforceability of any due-on-sale or due-on-encumbrance provision in any Mortgage Loan.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, without any other approval or consent, the Master Servicer (for non-Specially Serviced Loans) or the Special Servicer (for Specially Serviced Loans) may grant and process a borrower’s request for consent to subject the related Mortgaged Property to an immaterial easement, right of way or similar agreement for utilities, access, parking, public improvements or another purpose and may consent to subordination of the related Mortgage Loan to such easement, right of way or similar agreement.

Defeasance; Collateral Substitution

The terms of 53 of the Mortgage Loans (the “Defeasance Loans”), representing approximately 90.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, permit the applicable borrower at any time (provided, in most cases, that no event of default exists), after a lockout period of at least two years following the Closing Date (or, in the case of a Loan Combination, the earlier of (a) the second anniversary of the securitization of the last note included in such Loan Combination and (b) a specified date no earlier than three years from the date of origination of such Loan Combination) (the “Defeasance Lock Out Period”) and prior to the related open prepayment period described below, to obtain a release of a Mortgaged Property from the lien of the related Mortgage (a “Defeasance Option”) in connection with a defeasance. Certain of those Mortgage Loans also permit the related borrower to make certain voluntary prepayments or effect a partial defeasance in connection with partial releases as described under “—Voluntary Prepayments” and “—Partial Releases” below.

Exercise of a Defeasance Option is also generally conditioned on, among other things, (a) the borrower providing the mortgagee with at least 30 days’ prior written notice of the date on which such defeasance will occur (such date, the “Release Date”), and (b) the borrower (A) paying on any Release Date (i) all accrued and unpaid interest on the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan (or Loan Combination, if applicable) up to and including the Release Date, (ii) all other sums (excluding scheduled interest or principal payments due following the Release Date), due under the Mortgage Loan (or Loan Combination, if applicable) and under all other related Mortgage Loan documents executed in connection with the Defeasance Option, (iii) an amount (the “Defeasance Deposit”) that will be sufficient to (x) purchase non-callable obligations of, or backed by the full faith and credit of, the United States of America or, in certain cases, other “government securities” (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and otherwise satisfying REMIC requirements for defeasance collateral), that provide payments (1) on or prior to, but as close as possible to, all successive scheduled due dates occurring during the period from the Release Date to the related maturity date (or to the first day of the open period for such Mortgage Loan (or Loan Combination, if applicable)) and (2) in amounts equal to the scheduled payments due on such due dates under the Mortgage Loan (or Loan Combination, if applicable), or under the defeased portion of the Mortgage Loan (or Loan Combination, if applicable) in the case of a partial defeasance, including in the case of a Balloon Mortgage Loan, the balloon payment, and (y) pay any costs and expenses incurred in connection with the purchase of such government securities, and (B) delivering a security agreement granting the Issuing

S-157

Entity a first priority lien on the Defeasance Deposit and, in certain cases, the government securities purchased with the Defeasance Deposit and an opinion of counsel to such effect.

Pursuant to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Master Servicer will be responsible for purchasing (or causing the purchase of) the government securities on behalf of the borrower at the borrower’s expense to the extent consistent with the related Mortgage Loan documents. Pursuant to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, any amount in excess of the amount necessary to purchase such government securities will be returned to the borrower or other designated party, but in any event will not be assets of the Issuing Entity. Pursuant to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Master Servicer may accept as defeasance collateral any “government security,” within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(a)(8)(ii), notwithstanding any more restrictive requirements in the related Mortgage Loan documents; provided that the Master Servicer has received an opinion of counsel that acceptance of such defeasance collateral will not endanger the status of either Trust REMIC as a REMIC or result in the imposition of a tax upon either Trust REMIC or the Issuing Entity (including but not limited to the tax on “prohibited transactions” as defined in Section 860F(a)(2) of the Code and the tax on contributions to a REMIC set forth in Section 860G(d) of the Code, but not including the tax on “net income from foreclosure property” as set forth in Section 860G(c) of the Code). Simultaneously with such actions, the related Mortgaged Property (or applicable portion of the Mortgaged Property, in the case of partial defeasance) will be released from the lien of the Mortgage Loan (or Loan Combination, if applicable) and the pledged government securities (together with any Mortgaged Property not released, in the case of a partial defeasance) will be substituted as the collateral securing the Mortgage Loan (or Loan Combination, if applicable).

For additional information on Mortgage Loans that permit partial defeasance, see “—Partial Releases” below.

In general, if consistent with the related Mortgage Loan documents, a successor borrower established, designated or approved by the Master Servicer will assume the obligations of the related borrower exercising a Defeasance Option and the borrower will be relieved of its obligations under the Mortgage Loan. If a Mortgage Loan (or Loan Combination, if applicable) is partially defeased, if consistent with the related Mortgage Loan documents, generally the related promissory note will be split and only the defeased portion of the borrower’s obligations will be transferred to the successor borrower.

Voluntary Prepayments

Nine (9) Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 6.6% of the Initial Pool Balance, permit the related borrower, after a lockout period of 11 to 26 payments following the origination date, to prepay the Mortgage Loan in whole or, in some cases, in connection with a partial release of a Mortgaged Property, in part, in each case together with the payment of the greater of a yield maintenance charge and a prepayment premium of 1.0% of the prepaid amount if such prepayment occurs prior to the related open prepayment period.

Two (2) Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 3.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, permit the related borrower, after a lockout period of two years following the Closing Date, to either (a) substitute U.S. government securities as collateral and obtain a release of the related Mortgaged Property or (b) prepay the Mortgage Loan with the payment of the greater of a yield maintenance charge and a prepayment premium of 1.0% of the prepaid amount if such prepayment occurs prior to the related open prepayment period.

In addition to the above-referenced permitted partial prepayments, certain of the Mortgage Loans permit partial defeasance in connection with releases of individual Mortgaged Properties or portions of individual Mortgaged Properties, and certain of the Mortgage Loans that permit defeasance in whole permit partial release with the payment of a release price plus applicable yield maintenance. See “—Partial Releases” below.

S-158

Notwithstanding the foregoing restrictions on prepayments, each Mortgage Loan generally permits voluntary prepayments without payment of a yield maintenance charge or any prepayment premium during a limited “open period” immediately prior to and including the maturity date or Anticipated Repayment Date, as applicable, for such Mortgage Loan, as follows:

Prepayment Open Periods

Open Periods (Payments)	Number of Mortgage Loans	% of Initial Pool Balance
3	11	11.6%
4	44	56.4
5	4	12.7
7	5	19.2
Total	64	100.0%

See “Risk Factors—Some Provisions in the Mortgage Loans Underlying Your Offered Certificates May Be Challenged as Being Unenforceable—Prepayment Premiums, Fees and Charges” in the prospectus.

Partial Releases

The Mortgage Loans described below permit the release of one or more of the Mortgaged Properties or a portion of a single Mortgaged Property in connection with a partial prepayment, partial defeasance, or for no consideration in the case of parcels that are vacant, non-income producing or were not taken into account in the underwriting of the Mortgage Loan, subject to the satisfaction of certain specified conditions.

Property Releases; Partial Prepayments

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hammons Hotel Portfolio, representing approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, provided no monetary event of default under the related Loan Combination is then continuing, at any time prior to the first due date following the earlier to occur of (a) the third anniversary of the origination date of the Loan Combination and (b) the second anniversary of the closing date of the securitization into which the last piece of the Loan Combination is deposited, the borrowers may obtain the release of one or more of the related Mortgaged Properties from the lien of the Mortgage Loan documents in connection with a bona fide third-party sale of such Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents, including among others: (i) prepayment in an amount equal to 115% of the allocated loan amount for each Mortgaged Property being released and a prepayment fee equal to the greater of (a) a yield maintenance charge calculated based on the excess, if any, of the present values of the remaining scheduled principal and interest payments, over the outstanding principal balance of the Loan Combination, and (b) 1% of the principal amount being prepaid; (ii) after giving effect to the release, the debt service coverage ratio (as calculated under the Mortgage Loan documents) for the remaining Mortgaged Properties for the 12-month period preceding the end of the most recent fiscal quarter is no less than the greater of (a) 1.86x and (b) the debt service coverage ratio immediately prior to the release; (iii) delivery of Rating Agency Confirmation with respect to such partial release; and (iv) the satisfaction of certain REMIC requirements. See “—Litigation Considerations” above for more information.

Property Releases; Partial Defeasance

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hammons Hotel Portfolio, representing approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, provided no monetary event of default under the related Loan Combination is then continuing, at any time on or after the first due date following the earlier to occur of (a) the third anniversary of the origination date of the Loan Combination and (b) the second anniversary of the closing date of the securitization into which the last piece of the Loan Combination is deposited, the borrowers may obtain the release of one or more of the Mortgaged Properties from the lien of the Mortgage Loan documents, subject to the satisfaction of certain

S-159

conditions set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents, including among others: (i) delivery of defeasance collateral in an amount equal to the lesser of (A) 115% of the allocated loan amount for each Mortgaged Property being released and (B) the outstanding principal balance of the Loan Combination, (ii) after giving effect to the release, the debt service coverage ratio (as calculated under the Mortgage Loan documents) for the remaining Mortgaged Properties for the 12-month period preceding the end of the most recent fiscal quarter is no less than the greater of (a) 1.86x and (b) the debt service coverage ratio immediately prior to the release; (iii) delivery of Rating Agency Confirmation with respect to such defeasance; and (iv) the satisfaction of certain REMIC requirements. In addition, at any time on or after the first due date following the earlier of (a) the third anniversary of the origination date of the Loan Combination and (b) the second anniversary of the closing date of the securitization into which the last piece of the Loan Combination is deposited, in connection with defeasance of the Loan Combination, the borrower is permitted to prepay the outstanding principal balance of the Loan Combination only to the extent necessary to cause the debt service coverage ratio (as calculated under the related Mortgage Loan documents) for the related trailing 12-month period (ending on the last day of any fiscal quarter) to be no less than the greater of (a) 1.86x and (b) the debt service coverage ratio immediately prior to the release and which prepayment is required to include the applicable yield maintenance premium (as described under the related Mortgage Loan documents).

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as University Retail Portfolio, representing approximately 1.1% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgage Loan documents permit the release of an individual Mortgaged Property in connection with a partial defeasance after the second anniversary of the Closing Date, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including but not limited to: (i) delivery of defeasance collateral in an amount equal to 125% of the allocated loan amount for the Mortgaged Property being released; (ii) the debt service coverage ratio of the remaining Mortgaged Properties after such release is greater than or equal to 1.25x; (iii) the loan-to-value ratio of the remaining Mortgaged Properties after such release is less than or equal to 70%; and (iv) the satisfaction of certain REMIC requirements.

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio, representing approximately 0.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, provided no event of default is then continuing under the related Mortgage Loan, the Mortgage Loan documents permit the release of the lien of the Mortgage Loan as to any one or more of the individual properties at any time after 2 years after the Closing Date by providing the lender with the partial defeasance collateral, and upon satisfaction of certain conditions precedent, including, but not limited to: (i) delivery of a REMIC opinion; (ii) delivery of a rating agency confirmation; (iii) delivery of a certificate of a nationally recognized public accounting firm regarding the sufficiency of the defeasance collateral; (iv) as of the notice date and the date of consummation of the partial defeasance, the debt service coverage ratio after giving effect to the release will be greater than the greater of the debt service coverage ratio of all individual Mortgaged Properties encumbered immediately prior to the notice date or consummation (as applicable), and the Mortgage Loan origination date debt service coverage ratio; and (v) as of the notice date and consummation of the partial defeasance, the loan-to-value ratio with respect to the remaining Mortgaged Properties will be no greater than the lesser of the Mortgage Loan origination date loan-to-value ratio or the loan-to-value ratio with respect to all of the Mortgaged Properties immediately prior to the notice date or the consummation, as applicable.

Property Releases; Free Releases

· With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as AkzoNobel Coatings, representing approximately 0.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, the borrower may obtain the release of one outparcel, which was not included in the underwriting of the Mortgage Loan (the “Release Parcel”) from the lien of the Mortgage Loan subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the Mortgage Loan documents, including among others: (i) no event of default has occurred and is continuing under the related Mortgage Loan documents, (ii) delivery of a REMIC opinion, (iii) delivery of a Rating Agency Confirmation and (iv) the satisfaction of certain REMIC requirements.

S-160

Escrows

Sixty (60) Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 95.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, provide for monthly or upfront escrows to cover property taxes on the Mortgaged Properties.

Fifty-nine (59) Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 92.5% of the Initial Pool Balance, provide for monthly or upfront escrows to cover ongoing replacements and capital repairs.

Thirty (30) Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 82.2% of that portion of the Initial Pool Balance secured by office, mixed use, retail and industrial properties and one self storage property with office tenants, provide for upfront or monthly escrows for the full term or a portion of the term of the related Mortgage Loan to cover anticipated re-leasing costs, including tenant improvements and leasing commissions or other lease termination or occupancy issues. Such escrows are typically considered for office, mixed use, retail and industrial properties only.

Forty-seven (47) Mortgage Loans, representing approximately 45.6% of the Initial Pool Balance, provide for monthly or upfront escrows to cover insurance premiums on the Mortgaged Properties.

Certain of the reserves described above permit the related borrower to post a letter of credit in lieu of maintaining cash reserves.

Many of the Mortgage Loans provide for other escrows and reserves, including, in certain cases, reserves for debt service, operating expenses, renovations or other property enhancements vacancies at the related Mortgaged Property and other shortfalls or reserves to be released under circumstances described in the related Mortgage Loan documents.

Additional Mortgage Loan Information

Each of the tables presented in Annex B and Annex C to this prospectus supplement sets forth selected characteristics of the pool of Mortgage Loans as of the Cut-off Date, if applicable. For a detailed presentation of certain additional characteristics of the Mortgage Loans and the Mortgaged Properties on an individual basis, see Annex A to this prospectus supplement. For certain additional information regarding the 20 largest Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan) in the pool of Mortgage Loans, see “Structural and Collateral Term Sheet” in Annex B to this prospectus supplement.

The Loan Combinations

General

Each of the following Split Mortgage Loans is part of a Loan Combination comprised of the subject Mortgage Loan which is included in the Issuing Entity, and one or more Pari Passu Companion Loan(s) and/or Subordinate Companion Loan(s) that are held outside the Issuing Entity, each of which is evidenced by a separate promissory note and all of which are secured by the same Mortgages encumbering the same Mortgaged Property or portfolio of Mortgaged Properties:

· With respect to the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan, which has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $100,000,000 and is secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Illinois Center, representing approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgaged Properties also secure two (2) other loans that are pari passu in right of payment with the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan (each an “Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loan” and, collectively, the “Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans” and, together with the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan, the “Illinois Center Loan Combination”). The Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans have an aggregate principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of approximately $160,000,000. The Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans, which are evidenced by the non-controlling notes A-2 and A-3, are currently held by Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. and are expected to be included in one or more future commercial mortgage securitization transactions.

S-161

· With respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan, which has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $100,000,000 and is secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hammons Hotel Portfolio, representing approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgaged Properties also secure three (3) other loans that are pari passu in right of payment with the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan (each a “Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loan” and, collectively, the “Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans” and, together with the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan, the “Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination”). The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of approximately $150,800,000. The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans, which are evidenced by the non-controlling notes A-2, A-3 and A-4, are currently held by Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company and are expected to be included in one or more future commercial mortgage securitization transactions.

· With respect to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan, which has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $65,000,000 and is secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as The Decoration & Design Building, representing approximately 6.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgaged Property also secures one (1) other loan that is pari passu in right of payment with The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan (“The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan” and, together with The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan, “The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination”). The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan has a principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of approximately $100,000,000. The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan, which is evidenced by the controlling note A-1, was contributed by Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. to the commercial mortgage securitization transaction (the “CGCMT 2015-P1 Securitization”) involving the issuance of the Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-P1, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-P1. The Companion Loan Holder with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan is sometimes referred to in this prospectus supplement as “The Decoration & Design Building Companion Loan Holder”.

· With respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan, which has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $36,500,000 and is secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Somerset Park Apartments, representing approximately 3.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, the related Mortgaged Property also secures four (4) other loans that are pari passu in right of payment with the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan (each a “Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loan” and, collectively, the “Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans” and, together with the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan, the “Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination”). The Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of approximately $143,500,000. The Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans evidenced by the controlling notes A-1-1 and A-2-1 were contributed by Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC to the commercial mortgage securitization transaction (the “WFCM 2015-C30 Securitization”) involving the issuance of the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-C30, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C30. The Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans evidenced by the non-controlling notes A-1-2 and A-2-2 are currently held by Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC and are expected to be included in one or more future commercial mortgage securitization transactions. The Companion Loan Holders with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans are sometimes referred to in this prospectus supplement as the “Somerset Park Apartments Companion Loan Holders”.

Additionally, in connection with each Loan Combination, the following statements, concepts and definitions apply for the purposes of this prospectus supplement with respect to certain servicing and control matters:

· because each of (i) the Illinois Center Loan Combination and, (ii) the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination will be serviced pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, each of (i) the Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans, and (ii) the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans will be referred to as a “Serviced Companion Loan”, and each of (i) the Illinois

S-162

Center Loan Combination and (ii) the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination will sometimes be referred to in this prospectus supplement as a “Serviced Loan Combination”;

· because (i) The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination is being serviced pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement for the CGCMT 2015-P1 Securitization (the “CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) and (ii) the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination is being serviced pursuant to the WFCM 2015-C30 Securitization (the “WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), each of (i) The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan and (ii) the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan will sometimes be referred to in this prospectus supplement as an “Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan”, each of (i) The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan and (ii) the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans will sometimes be referred to in this prospectus supplement as an “Outside Serviced Companion Loan”, and each of (i) The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination and (ii) the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination will sometimes be referred to in this prospectus supplement as an “Outside Serviced Loan Combination”;

· each of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement is sometimes referred to in this prospectus supplement as an “Outside Servicing Agreement”;

· each of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Securitization and the WFCM 2015-C30 Securitization is sometimes referred to in this prospectus supplement as an “Outside Securitization”;

· the issuing entity of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Securitization is referred to as the “CGCMT 2015-P1 Issuing Entity”; and the issuing entity of the WFCM 2015-C30 Securitization is referred to in this prospectus supplement as the “WFCM 2015-C30 Issuing Entity”;

· the master servicer for the CGCMT 2015-P1 Securitization, which is the servicer of The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, is referred to in this prospectus supplement as the “CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer”; the general master servicer for the WFCM 2015-C30 Securitization, which is the servicer of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, is referred to in this prospectus supplement as the “WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer”; and each of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer and the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer is referred to in this prospectus supplement as an “Outside Servicer”;

· the special servicer for the CGCMT 2015-P1 Securitization, which is the special servicer of The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, is referred to in this prospectus supplement as the “CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer”; the general special servicer for the WFCM 2015-C30 Securitization, which is the special servicer of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, is referred to in this prospectus supplement as the “WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer”; and each of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer and the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer is referred to in this prospectus supplement as an “Outside Special Servicer”;

· the trustee for the CGCMT 2015-P1 Securitization is referred to in this prospectus supplement as the “CGCMT 2015-P1 Trustee”; the trustee for the WFCM 2015-C30 Securitization is referred to in this prospectus supplement as the “WFCM 2015-C30 Trustee”; and each of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Trustee and the WFCM 2015-C30 Trustee is sometimes referred to in this prospectus supplement as an “Outside Trustee”;

· the operating advisor (or equivalent party) under each of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement is referred to in this prospectus supplement (with respect to each applicable Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan) as an “Outside Operating Advisor”; and

· the controlling class representative (or equivalent party) under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement is referred to in this prospectus supplement (with respect to the applicable

S-163

Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan) as the “CGCMT 2015-P1 Controlling Class Representative”; the controlling class representative (or equivalent party) under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement is referred to in this prospectus supplement (with respect to the applicable Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan) as the “WFCM 2015-C30 Controlling Class Representative”; and each of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Controlling Class Representative and the WFCM 2015-C30 Controlling Class Representative is referred to in this prospectus supplement as an “Outside Controlling Class Representative”.

Each Split Mortgage Loan and its related Companion Loan(s) are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted. Each Pari Passu Companion Loan is pari passu in right of payment with its related Split Mortgage Loan. Each Subordinate Companion Loan is subordinate in right of payment to the related Split Mortgage Loan. Only each Split Mortgage Loan is included in the Issuing Entity. No Companion Loan is an asset of the Issuing Entity.

Set forth in the chart below is certain information regarding each Split Mortgage Loan and its related Companion Loan(s).

Loan Combination Summary
Mortgaged Property Name	Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance	Aggregate Pari Passu Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance	Loan Combination Cut-off Date Balance	Controlling Pooling & Servicing Agreement	Master Servicer	Special Servicer
Illinois Center	$100,000,000	10.4%	$160,000,000(1)	$260,000,000	CGCMT 2015-GC33	Wells Fargo Bank, National Association	LNR Partners, LLC
Hammons Hotel Portfolio	$100,000,000	10.4%	$150,800,000(2)	$250,800,000	CGCMT 2015-GC33	Wells Fargo Bank, National Association	LNR Partners, LLC
The Decoration & Design Building	$65,000,000	6.8%	$100,000,000	$165,000,000	CGCMT 2015-P1	Wells Fargo Bank, National Association	LNR Partners, LLC
Somerset Park Apartments	$36,500,000	3.8%	$143,500,000(3)	$180,000,000	WFCM 2015-C30	Wells Fargo Bank, National Association	CWCapital Asset Management LLC

(1) The Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans are currently comprised of the non-controlling notes A-2 and A-3, which have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $160,000,000.

(2) The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans are currently comprised of the non-controlling notes A-2, A-3 and A-4, which have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $150,800,000.

(3) The Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans are currently comprised of the controlling notes A-1-1 and A-2-1 and the non-controlling notes A-1-2 and A-2-2, which have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $143,500,000.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any Companion Loan that has not been included in a commercial mortgage securitization transaction as of the Cut-off Date, the note(s) evidencing such Companion Loan may each be further split into two or more notes that may be held by separate entities or included in multiple commercial mortgage securitization transactions in accordance with the related Co-Lender Agreement (as defined below).

In connection with each Loan Combination, the relative rights and obligations of the Trustee on behalf of the Issuing Entity and each related Companion Loan Holder are generally governed by a co-lender agreement, intercreditor agreement, agreement among noteholders or comparable agreement (each, a “Co-Lender Agreement”). Each Co-Lender Agreement provides, among other things, (i) that one of the holders will be the “controlling note holder” (the “Controlling Note Holder”) entitled to (a) approve or, in some cases, direct material servicing decisions involving the related Loan Combination, and (b) in some cases, replace the applicable special servicer with respect to such Loan Combination with or without cause; (ii) for the servicing and administration of the subject Loan Combination and any related Mortgaged Property; and (iii) that expenses, losses and shortfalls relating to the Loan Combination will be allocated first to any related Subordinate Companion Loan (if any), and then, on a pro rata basis to the holders of the subject Mortgage Loan and any related Pari Passu Companion Loan(s) (if any), in each case as more particularly described below in this “—The Loan Combinations” section.

Set forth below are certain terms and provisions of each Loan Combination and the related Co-Lender Agreement. For more information regarding the servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans, see “The

S-164

Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Certain Considerations Regarding the Outside Serviced Loan Combinations” and “—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement. Also, see “Structural and Collateral Term Sheet—Illinois Center”, “—Hammons Hotel Portfolio”, “—The Decoration & Design Building”, and “—Somerset Park Apartments” in Annex B to this prospectus supplement.

The Illinois Center Loan Combination

Servicing

The Illinois Center Loan Combination and any related REO Property will be serviced and administered by the Master Servicer and, if necessary, the Special Servicer, pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in the manner described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement” in this prospectus supplement, but subject to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement. In servicing the Illinois Center Loan Combination, the Servicing Standard set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will require the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer to take into account the interests of the Certificateholders and the related Companion Loan Holders as a collective whole.

Amounts payable to the Issuing Entity as holder of the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement will be included in the Available Funds for the related Distribution Date to the extent described in this prospectus supplement and amounts payable to the related Companion Loan Holders will be distributed to such holders net of certain fees and expenses on the Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans as provided in the related Co-Lender Agreement.

Application of Payments

The related Co-Lender Agreement sets forth the respective rights of the holder of the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan and the holders of the Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans with respect to distributions of funds received in respect of the Illinois Center Loan Combination, and provides, in general, that:

· the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan and the Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans are of equal priority with each other and no portion of any of them will have priority or preference over any portion of the others or security therefor;

· all payments, proceeds and other recoveries on or in respect of the Illinois Center Loan Combination or the related Mortgaged Property will be applied to the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan and the Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans on a pro rata and pari passu basis according to their respective outstanding principal balances (subject, in each case, to the payment and reimbursement rights of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator and the Trustee) in accordance with the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement and the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

· expenses, losses and shortfalls relating to the Illinois Center Loan Combination will, in general, be allocated, on a pro rata and pari passu basis, to the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan and the Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a P&I Advance is made with respect to the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan, then that P&I Advance, together with interest thereon, may only be reimbursed out of future payments and collections on the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan or, as and to the extent described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances” in this prospectus supplement, on other Mortgage Loans, but not out of payments or other collections on the Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans.

Certain costs and expenses (such as a pro rata share of a Property Advance) allocable to the Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans may be paid or reimbursed out of payments and other collections on the Mortgage Pool, subject to the Issuing Entity’s right to reimbursement from future payments and other collections on the Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans or from general collections with respect to the securitization of the Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans. This may result in temporary (or, if not ultimately reimbursed, permanent) shortfalls to the Certificateholders.

S-165

Consultation and Control

Pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement, the controlling note holder with respect to the Illinois Center Loan Combination, as of any date of determination, will be the Trustee on behalf of the Issuing Entity as holder of the Mortgage Loan; provided, that, unless a Control Termination Event exists, the Controlling Class Representative will be entitled to exercise the rights of the controlling note holder with respect to the Illinois Center Loan Combination. In its capacity as representative of the directing holder under the related Co-Lender Agreement, the Controlling Class Representative will be entitled to exercise all of the rights of the Controlling Class Representative set forth under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Directing Holder” in this prospectus supplement with respect to the Illinois Center Loan Combination and the implementation of any recommended actions outlined in an asset status report with respect to the Illinois Center Loan Combination will require the approval of the Controlling Class Representative as and to the extent described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Asset Status Reports”. Pursuant to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Controlling Class Representative will have the same consent and/or consultation rights with respect to the Illinois Center Loan Combination as it does, and for so long as it does, with respect to the other Mortgage Loans included in the Issuing Entity that do not have Companion Loans and that are serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

In addition, pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, each related Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) will (i) have a right to receive copies of all notices, information and reports that the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, is required to provide to the Controlling Class Representative (within the same time frame such notices, information and reports are or would have been required to be provided to the Controlling Class Representative under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement without regard to the occurrence of a Control Termination Event or Consultation Termination Event) with respect to any Major Decisions to be taken with respect to the Illinois Center Loan Combination or the implementation of any recommended action outlined in an asset status report relating to the Illinois Center Loan Combination and (ii) have the right to be consulted on a strictly non-binding basis with respect to any Major Decisions to be taken with respect to the Illinois Center Loan Combination or the implementation of any recommended actions outlined in an asset status report relating to the Illinois Center Loan Combination. The consultation right of each such Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) will expire 10 business days following the delivery to such Companion Loan Holder of written notice of a proposed action, together with copies of the notices, information and reports required to be provided to the Controlling Class Representative, whether or not such Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) has responded within such period; provided, that if the Master Servicer (or the Special Servicer, as applicable) proposes a new course of action that is materially different from the action previously proposed, the 10 business day consultation period will be deemed to begin anew. Notwithstanding the related Companion Loan Holders’ (or their representatives’) consultation rights described above, the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, is permitted to make any Major Decision or take any action set forth in the asset status report before the expiration of the aforementioned 10 business day period if it determines that immediate action with respect to such decision is necessary to protect the interests of the holders of the Illinois Center Loan Combination. Neither the Master Servicer nor the Special Servicer will be obligated at any time to follow or take any alternative actions recommended by the related Companion Loan Holders (or their representatives).

Neither the Master Servicer nor the Special Servicer may take or refrain from taking any action pursuant to instructions from a related Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) that would cause the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, to violate applicable law, the terms of the Illinois Center Loan Combination, the related Co-Lender Agreement, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, including the Servicing Standard, or the REMIC provisions or that would (i) expose the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Depositor, a mortgage loan seller, the Issuing Entity, the Trustee, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator or their respective affiliates, officers, directors, employees or agents to any claim, suit or liability, (ii) materially expand the scope of the Master Servicer’s or the Special Servicer’s responsibilities, or (iii) cause the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer to act, or fail to act, in a manner that is not in the best interests of the Certificateholders.

In addition to the consultation rights of the related Companion Loan Holders (or their representatives) described above, pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, each related Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) will have the right to attend annual meetings (which may be held telephonically or in person, at the discretion of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable) with the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, upon reasonable notice and at times reasonably acceptable to the Master

S-166

Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, in which servicing issues related to the Illinois Center Loan Combination are discussed.

Application of Penalty Charges

The related Co-Lender Agreement provides that Penalty Charges paid on the Illinois Center Loan Combination shall first, be used to reduce, on a pro rata basis, the amounts payable on each of the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan and the Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans by the amount necessary to pay the Master Servicer, the Trustee or the Special Servicer for any interest accrued on any Property Advances and reimbursement of any Property Advances in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, second, be used to reduce the respective amounts payable on each of the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan and the Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans by the amount necessary to pay the Master Servicer and the Trustee, and the master servicer and the trustee for any securitization of an Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loan, for any interest accrued on any P&I Advance (or analogous P&I advance made pursuant to any document governing the servicing of an Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loan) made with respect to such loan by such party (if and as specified in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or any document governing the servicing of an Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loan, as applicable), third, be used to reduce, on a pro rata basis, the amounts payable on each of the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan and the Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans by the amount necessary to pay additional trust fund expenses (other than Special Servicing Fees, unpaid Workout Fees and Liquidation Fees) incurred with respect to the Illinois Center Loan Combination (as specified in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) and, finally, (i) in the case of the remaining amount of Penalty Charges allocable to the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan, be paid to the Master Servicer and/or the Special Servicer as additional servicing compensation as provided in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and (ii) in the case of the remaining amount of Penalty Charges allocable to any Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loan, be paid, (x) prior to the securitization of such Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loan, to the related Companion Loan Holder and (y) following the securitization of such Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loan, to the Master Servicer and/or the Special Servicer as additional servicing compensation as provided in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

Sale of Defaulted Loan Combination

Pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, if the Illinois Center Loan Combination becomes a Defaulted Mortgage Loan, and if the Special Servicer determines to sell the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, then the Special Servicer will be required to sell the Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans together with the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan as one whole loan in accordance with the procedures set forth under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans—Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties” in this prospectus supplement.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Special Servicer will not be permitted to sell the Illinois Center Loan Combination if it becomes a Defaulted Mortgage Loan without the written consent of the related Companion Loan Holders (provided that such consent is not required from any such Companion Loan Holder if such Companion Loan Holder is the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower) unless the Special Servicer has delivered to each such Companion Loan Holder (or their representatives): (a) at least 15 business days’ prior written notice of any decision to attempt to sell the Illinois Center Loan Combination; (b) at least 10 days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of each bid package (together with any material amendments to such bid packages) received by the Special Servicer in connection with any such proposed sale; (c) at least 10 days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of the most recent appraisal for the Illinois Center Loan Combination, and any documents in the servicing file reasonably requested by such Companion Loan Holder that are material to the price of the Illinois Center Loan Combination; and (d) until the sale is completed, and a reasonable period of time (but no less time than is afforded to other offerors and the Controlling Class Representative) prior to the proposed sale date, all information and other documents being provided to other offerors and all leases or other documents that are approved by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer in connection with the proposed sale; provided, that any related Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) may waive, as to itself, any of the delivery or timing requirements set forth in this sentence. Subject to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, each related Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) will be permitted to bid at any sale of the Illinois Center Loan Combination unless such Companion Loan Holder is the borrower or an agent or affiliate of the borrower.

See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans—Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties” in this prospectus supplement.

S-167

Special Servicer Appointment Rights

Pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement, the controlling note holder with respect to the Illinois Center Loan Combination (which, as of any date of determination, will be the Trustee on behalf of the Issuing Entity as holder of the Illinois Center Mortgage Loan, or its representative) will have the right, at any time, with or without cause, subject to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, to replace the Special Servicer then acting with respect to the Illinois Center Loan Combination and appoint a replacement Special Servicer in lieu thereof without the consent of the related Companion Loan Holders (or their representatives). The Controlling Class Representative (prior to a Control Termination Event), and the applicable Certificateholders with the requisite percentage of voting rights (after a Control Termination Event) will have the right, with or without cause, to replace the Special Servicer then acting with respect to the Illinois Center Loan Combination and appoint a replacement Special Servicer in lieu thereof, as described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination of the Special Servicer” in this prospectus supplement. Each related Companion Loan Holder may direct the Trustee to terminate the Special Servicer (solely with respect to the Illinois Center Loan Combination) upon a Servicer Termination Event with respect to the Special Servicer that affects such related Companion Loan Holder.

The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination

Servicing

The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination and any related REO Property will be serviced and administered by the Master Servicer and, if necessary, the Special Servicer, pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in the manner described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement, but subject to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement. In servicing the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination, the Servicing Standard set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will require the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer to take into account the interests of both the Certificateholders and the related Companion Loan Holders as a collective whole.

Amounts payable to the Issuing Entity as holder of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement will be included in the Available Funds for the related Distribution Date to the extent described in this prospectus supplement and amounts payable to the related Companion Loan Holders will be distributed to such holders net of certain fees and expenses on the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans as provided in the related Co-Lender Agreement.

Application of Payments

The related Co-Lender Agreement sets forth the respective rights of the holder of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the holders of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans with respect to distributions of funds received in respect of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination, and provides, in general, that:

· the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans are of equal priority with each other and no portion of any of them will have priority or preference over any portion of the others or security therefor;

· all payments, proceeds and other recoveries on or in respect of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Loan Combination or the related Mortgaged Property will be applied to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans on a pro rata and pari passu basis according to their respective outstanding principal balances (subject, in each case, to the payment and reimbursement rights of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator and the Trustee) in accordance with the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement and the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

· expenses, losses and shortfalls relating to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination will be allocated, on a pro rata and pari passu basis, to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans.

S-168

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a P&I Advance is made with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan, then that P&I Advance, together with interest thereon, may only be reimbursed out of future payments and collections on the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan or, as and to the extent described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances” in this prospectus supplement, on other Mortgage Loans, but not out of payments or other collections on the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans.

Certain costs and expenses (such as a pro rata share of a Property Advance) allocable to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans may be paid or reimbursed out of payments and other collections on the Mortgage Pool, subject to the Issuing Entity’s right to reimbursement from future payments and other collections on the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans or from general collections with respect to the securitization of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans. This may result in temporary (or, if not ultimately reimbursed, permanent) shortfalls to the Certificateholders.

Consultation and Control

Pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement, the Directing Holder with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination, as of any date of determination, will be the Trustee on behalf of the Issuing Entity as holder of the Mortgage Loan; provided, that, unless a Control Termination Event exists, the Controlling Class Representative will be entitled to exercise the rights of the Directing Holder with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination. In its capacity as representative of the Directing Holder under the related Co-Lender Agreement, the Controlling Class Representative will be entitled to exercise all of the rights of the Controlling Class Representative set forth under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination and the implementation of any recommended actions outlined in an asset status report with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination will require the approval of the Controlling Class Representative as and to the extent described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Directing Holder” and “—Asset Status Reports” in this prospectus supplement. Pursuant to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Controlling Class Representative will have the same consent and/or consultation rights with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination as it does, and for so long as it does, with respect to the other Mortgage Loans (exclusive of the Outside-Serviced Mortgage Loans) included in the Issuing Entity.

In addition, pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, the related Companion Loan Holder (or its representative which, at any time any Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loan is included in a securitization, may be the controlling class representative for that securitization or any other party assigned the rights to exercise the rights of the holders of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans, as and to the extent provided in the related pooling and servicing agreement) will (i) have a right to receive copies of all notices, information and reports that the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, is required to provide to the Controlling Class Representative (within the same time frame such notices, information and reports are or would have been required to be provided to the Controlling Class Representative under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement without regard to the occurrence of a Control Termination Event or Consultation Termination Event) with respect to any Major Decisions to be taken with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination or the implementation of any recommended action outlined in an asset status report relating to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination and (ii) have the right to be consulted on a strictly non-binding basis with respect to any Major Decisions to be taken with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination or the implementation of any recommended action outlined in an asset status report relating to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination. The consultation right of the related Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) will expire 10 business days following the delivery of notice and information relating to the matter subject to consultation whether or not the related Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) has responded within such period; provided, that if the Master Servicer (or the Special Servicer, as applicable) proposes a new course of action that is materially different from the actions previously proposed, the 10 business-day consultation period will be deemed to begin anew. Notwithstanding the related Companion Loan Holder’s (or its representative’s) consultation rights described above, the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, is permitted to take any material action or any action set forth in the asset status report before the expiration of the aforementioned 10 business-day period if it determines that immediate action with respect to such decision is necessary to protect the interests of the holders of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination. Neither the Master Servicer nor the Special Servicer will be obligated at any time to follow or take any alternative actions recommended by the related Companion Loan Holder (or its representative, including, if any Hammons Hotel

S-169

Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loan has been contributed to a securitization, the related controlling class representative).

Neither the Master Servicer nor the Special Servicer may take or refrain from taking any action based on advice or consultation provided by the related Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) that would cause the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, to violate applicable law, the terms of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination, the related Co-Lender Agreement, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, including the Servicing Standard, or the REMIC provisions or that would (i) expose the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Depositor, a mortgage loan seller, the Issuing Entity, the Trustee, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator or their respective affiliates, officers, directors, employees or agents to any claim, suit or liability, (ii) materially expand the scope of the Master Servicer’s or the Special Servicer’s responsibilities, or (iii) cause the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer to act, or fail to act, in a manner that is not in the best interests of the Certificateholders or the Companion Loan Holders.

In addition to the consultation rights of the related Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) described above, pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, the related Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) will have the right to attend (in-person or telephonic) annual meetings with the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, upon reasonable notice and at times reasonably acceptable to the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, for the purpose of discussing servicing issues related to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination.

Application of Penalty Charges

The related Co-Lender Agreement provides that Penalty Charges paid on the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination shall first, be used to reduce, on a pro rata basis, the amounts payable on each of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans by the amount necessary to reimburse the Master Servicer, the Trustee or the Special Servicer for any interest accrued on any Property Advances and reimbursement of any Property Advances in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, second, be used to reduce the respective amounts payable on each of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans by the amount necessary to pay the Master Servicer and the Trustee, and the master servicer and the trustee for any securitization of any Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loan, for any interest accrued on any P&I Advance (or analogous P&I advance made pursuant to the document governing the servicing of such Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loan) made with respect to such loan by such party (if and as specified in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or the document governing the servicing of such Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loan, as applicable), third, be used to reduce, on a pro rata basis, the amounts payable on each of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan and the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans by the amount necessary to pay additional trust fund expenses (other than Special Servicing Fees, unpaid Workout Fees and Liquidation Fees) incurred with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination (as specified in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) and, finally, (i) in the case of the remaining amount of Penalty Charges allocable to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan, be paid to the Master Servicer and/or the Special Servicer as additional servicing compensation as provided in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and (ii) in the case of the remaining amount of Penalty Charges allocable to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans, be paid, (x) prior to the securitization of either of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans, to the related Companion Loan Holder and (y) following the securitization of either of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans, to the Master Servicer and/or the Special Servicer as additional servicing compensation as provided in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

Sale of Defaulted Loan Combination

Pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, if the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination becomes a Defaulted Mortgage Loan, and if the Special Servicer determines to sell the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, then the Special Servicer will be required to sell the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans together with the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan as one whole loan in accordance with the procedures set forth under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans—Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties” in this prospectus supplement.

S-170

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Special Servicer will not be permitted to sell the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination if it becomes a Defaulted Mortgage Loan without the written consent of the related Companion Loan Holder (provided that such consent is not required if the related Companion Loan Holder is the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower) unless the Special Servicer has delivered to such holder (or its representative): (a) at least 15 business days’ prior written notice of any decision to attempt to sell the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination; (b) at least 10 days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of each bid package (together with any material amendments to such bid packages) received by the Special Servicer in connection with any such proposed sale; (c) at least 10 days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of the most recent appraisal for the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination, and any documents in the servicing file reasonably requested by the related Companion Loan Holder that are material to the price of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination; and (d) until the sale is completed, and a reasonable period of time (but no less time than is afforded to other offerors and the Controlling Class Representative) prior to the proposed sale date, all information and other documents being provided to other offerors and all leases or other documents that are approved by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer in connection with the proposed sale; provided, that the related Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) may waive any of the delivery or timing requirements set forth in this sentence. Pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, each related Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) will be permitted to submit an offer at any sale of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination unless it is the borrower or an agent or affiliate of the borrower.

See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans—Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties” in this prospectus supplement.

Special Servicer Appointment Rights

Pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement and the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Directing Holder with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination (which, as of any date of determination, will be the Trustee on behalf of the Issuing Entity as holder of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage Loan, or its representative) will have the right, with or without cause, subject to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, to replace the Special Servicer then acting with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination and appoint a replacement Special Servicer in lieu thereof without the consent of the related Companion Loan Holder (or its representative). The Controlling Class Representative, as representative of the Controlling Class Certificateholder (prior to a Control Termination Event), and the applicable Certificateholders with the requisite percentage of voting rights (after a Control Termination Event), will have the right, with or without cause, to replace the Special Servicer then acting with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination and appoint a replacement Special Servicer in lieu thereof, as described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination of the Special Servicer” in this prospectus supplement. Each related Companion Loan Holder may direct the Trustee to terminate the Special Servicer (solely with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination) upon a Servicer Termination Event with respect to the Special Servicer that affects such related Companion Loan Holder.

The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination

Servicing

The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination and any related REO Property will be serviced and administered pursuant to the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2015, among Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer (the “CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer”), LNR Partners, LLC, as special servicer (the “CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer”), Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as operating advisor (the “CGCMT 2015-P1 Operating Advisor”), Citibank, N.A., as certificate administrator (the “CGCMT 2015-P1 Certificate Administrator”), Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee (the “CGCMT 2015-P1 Trustee”) and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as custodian, by the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer and the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer, in the manner described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Certain Considerations Regarding the Outside Serviced Loan Combinations” and “—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans—Servicing of The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan” in this prospectus supplement, but subject to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement. In servicing The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination, the servicing standard set forth in the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement will require the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer and the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer to take into account the interests of both the Certificateholders and the related Companion Loan Holder as a collective whole.

S-171

Amounts payable to the Issuing Entity as holder of The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement will be included in the Available Funds for the related Distribution Date to the extent described in this prospectus supplement net of certain fees and expenses as set forth in the related Co-Lender Agreement.

Application of Payments

The related Co-Lender Agreement sets forth the respective rights of the holder of The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan and the holder of The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan with respect to distributions of funds received in respect of The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination, and provides, in general, that:

· The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan and The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan are of equal priority with each other and no portion of either of them will have priority or preference over any portion of the other or security therefor;

· all payments, proceeds and other recoveries on or in respect of The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination or the related Mortgaged Property will be applied to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan and The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan on a pro rata and pari passu basis according to their respective outstanding principal balances (subject, in each case, to the payment and reimbursement rights of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Operating Advisor, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Certificate Administrator and the CGCMT 2015-P1 Trustee) in accordance with the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement and the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

· expenses, losses and shortfalls relating to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination will, in general, be allocated, on a pro rata and pari passu basis, to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan and The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a P&I Advance is made with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan, then that P&I Advance, together with interest thereon, may only be reimbursed out of future payments and collections on The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan or, as and to the extent described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances” in this prospectus supplement, on other Mortgage Loans, but not out of payments or other collections on The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan. Similarly, P&I advances on The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan are not reimbursable out of payments or other collections on The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan.

Certain costs and expenses (such as a pro rata share of a property protection advance) allocable to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan may be paid or reimbursed out of payments and other collections on the mortgage loans in the CGCMT 2015-P1 Securitization, subject to the CGCMT 2015-P1 Issuing Entity’s right to reimbursement from future payments and other collections on The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan or from general collections on the Mortgage Pool.

Consultation and Control

Pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement, the directing holder with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination, as of any date of determination, will be the CGCMT 2015-P1 Trustee on behalf of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Issuing Entity as holder of the related Companion Loan; provided, that, unless a control termination event exists under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Controlling Class Representative will be entitled to exercise the rights of the directing holder with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination. In its capacity as representative of the directing holder under the related Co-Lender Agreement, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Controlling Class Representative will be entitled to exercise consent and/or consultation rights (which consent and/or consultation rights are substantially similar to, but not necessarily identical to, the rights of the Directing Holder set forth under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Directing Holder” in this prospectus supplement) with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination and the implementation of any recommended actions outlined in an asset status report with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination will require the approval of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Controlling Class Representative. Pursuant to the terms of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing

S-172

Agreement, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Controlling Class Representative will have the same consent and/or consultation rights with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination as it does, and for so long as it does, with respect to the other mortgage loans included in the CGCMT 2015-P1 Issuing Entity that do not have Companion Loans and that are serviced under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

In addition, pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, the Issuing Entity, as holder of The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan (or its representative) will (i) have a right to receive copies of all notices, information and reports that the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer or the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer, as applicable, is required to provide to the CGCMT 2015-P1 Controlling Class Representative (within the same time frame such notices, information and reports are or would have been required to be provided to the CGCMT 2015-P1 Controlling Class Representative under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement without regard to the occurrence thereunder of a control termination event or consultation termination event) with respect to any “major decisions” (as defined under the related Co-Lender Agreement) to be taken with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination or the implementation of any recommended action outlined in an asset status report relating to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination and (ii) have the right to be consulted on a strictly non-binding basis with respect to any “major decisions” (as defined under the related Co-Lender Agreement) to be taken with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination or the implementation of any recommended actions outlined in an asset status report relating to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination. The consultation right of the Issuing Entity (or its representative) will expire 10 business days following the delivery of written notice of the proposed action, together with copies of the notices, information and reports required to be provided to the CGCMT 2015-P1 Controlling Class Representative, whether or not the Issuing Entity (or its representative) has responded within such period; provided, that if the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer or the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer, as applicable, proposes a new course of action that is materially different from the action previously proposed, the 10 business day consultation period will be deemed to begin anew. Notwithstanding the Issuing Entity’s (or its representative’s) consultation rights described above, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer or the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer, as applicable, is permitted to make a “major decision” (as defined under the related Co-Lender Agreement) or take any action set forth in the asset status report before the expiration of the aforementioned 10 business day period if it determines that immediate action with respect to such decision is necessary to protect the interests of the holders of The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination. Neither the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer nor the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer will be obligated at any time to follow or take any alternative actions recommended by the Issuing Entity (or its representative).

Neither the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer nor the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer may take or refrain from taking any action pursuant to instructions from the Issuing Entity (or its representative) that would cause the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer or the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer, as applicable, to violate applicable law, the terms of The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination, the related Co-Lender Agreement, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, including the servicing standard under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, or the REMIC provisions or that would (i) expose the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer, the CGCMT 2015-P1 depositor, a mortgage loan seller with respect to the CGCMT 2015-P1 Securitization, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Issuing Entity, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Trustee, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Operating Advisor, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Certificate Administrator or their respective affiliates, officers, directors, employees or agents to any claim, suit or liability, (ii) materially expand the scope of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer’s or the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer’s responsibilities, or (iii) cause the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer or the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer to act, or fail to act, in a manner that is not in the best interests of the CGCMT 2015-P1 certificateholders or the servicing standard under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

In addition to the consultation rights of the Issuing Entity (or its representative) described above, pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, the Issuing Entity (or its representative) will have the right to attend annual meetings (which may be held telephonically or in person, at the discretion of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer or the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer, as applicable) with the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer or the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer, as applicable, upon reasonable notice and at times reasonably acceptable to the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer or the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer, as applicable, in which servicing issues related to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination are discussed. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.

S-173

Application of Penalty Charges

The related Co-Lender Agreement provides that items in the nature of penalty charges paid on The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination will first be used to reduce, on a pro rata basis, the amounts payable on each of The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan and The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan by the amount necessary to pay the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Trustee or the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer for any interest accrued on any property protection advances and reimbursement of any property protection advances in accordance with the terms of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, second, be used to reduce the respective amounts payable on each of The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan and The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan by the amount necessary to pay the Master Servicer and the Trustee, and the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer and the CGCMT 2015-P1 Trustee, for any interest accrued on any P&I Advance (or analogous P&I advance made pursuant to the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement) made with respect to such loan by such party (if and as specified in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, as applicable), third, be used to reduce, on a pro rata basis, the amounts payable on each of The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan and The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan by the amount necessary to pay additional trust fund expenses (other than special servicing fees, unpaid workout fees and liquidation fees, each as payable under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement) incurred with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination (as specified in the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement) and, finally, in the case of the remaining amount of penalty charges allocable to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan and The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan, be paid to the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer and/or the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer as additional servicing compensation as provided in the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

Sale of Defaulted Loan Combination

Pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, if The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination becomes a defaulted mortgage loan under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and if the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer determines to sell The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan in accordance with the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, then the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer will be required to sell The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan together with The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan as a single whole loan in accordance with the procedures set forth under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer will not be permitted to sell The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination if it becomes a defaulted mortgage loan under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement without the written consent of the Issuing Entity (or its representative), as holder of The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan (provided that such consent is not required if the Issuing Entity is the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower), unless the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer has delivered to such holder (or its representative): (a) at least 15 business days’ prior written notice of any decision to attempt to sell The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination; (b) at least 10 days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of each bid package (together with any material amendments to such bid packages) received by the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer in connection with any such proposed sale; (c) at least 10 days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of the most recent appraisal for The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination, and any documents in the servicing file reasonably requested by the Issuing Entity (or its representative) that are material to the price of The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination; and (d) until the sale is completed, and a reasonable period of time (but no less time than is afforded to other offerors and the CGCMT 2015-P1 Controlling Class Representative) prior to the proposed sale date, all information and other documents being provided to other offerors and all leases or other documents that are approved by the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer or the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer in connection with the proposed sale; provided, that the Issuing Entity (or its representative) may waive any of the delivery or timing requirements set forth in this sentence. Subject to the terms of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Issuing Entity (or its representative) will be permitted to bid at any sale of The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination unless the Issuing Entity is the borrower or an agent or affiliate of the borrower.

See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans—Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties” in this prospectus supplement.

S-174

Special Servicer Appointment Rights

Pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement and the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the directing holder with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination (which, as of any date of determination, will be the CGCMT 2015-P1 Trustee on behalf of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Issuing Entity as holder of The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan, or its representative which, prior to a control termination event under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, will be the CGCMT 2015-P1 Controlling Class Representative) will have the right, at any time, with or without cause, to replace the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer then acting with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination and appoint a replacement special servicer in lieu thereof without the consent of the Issuing Entity (or its representative). The applicable CGCMT 2015-P1 certificateholders with the requisite percentage of voting rights (after a control termination event under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement) will have the right, with or without cause, to replace the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer then acting with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination and appoint a replacement CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer in lieu thereof without the consent of the Issuing Entity (or its representative), as described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement. The Issuing Entity (or its representative) will be permitted to direct the CGCMT 2015-P1 Trustee to terminate the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer (solely with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination) upon a servicer termination event under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement with respect to the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer that affects the Issuing Entity as the holder of The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan.

The Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination

Servicing

The Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination is being serviced and administered in accordance with the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated August 1, 2015, between Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as depositor, the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer, the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer, National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB master servicer, National Cooperative Bank, N.A., as NCB special servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as trust advisor (the “WFCM 2015-C30 Operating Advisor”), Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as certificate administrator, tax administrator and custodian (the “WFCM 2015-C30 Certificate Administrator”) and the WFCM 2015-C30 Trustee, which is separate from the Pooling and Servicing Agreement under which the Certificates will be issued, by the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer and the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer, in the manner described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Certain Considerations Regarding the Outside Serviced Loan Combinations” and “—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans—Servicing of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan” in this prospectus supplement, but subject to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement. In servicing the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination, the servicing standard set forth in the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement will require the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer and the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer to take into account the interests of the Certificateholders and the holders of the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans as a collective whole.

Amounts payable to the Issuing Entity as holder of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement will be included in the Available Funds for the related Distribution Date to the extent described in this prospectus supplement net of certain fees and expenses as provided in the related Co-Lender Agreement.

Application of Payments

The related Co-Lender Agreement with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination sets forth the respective rights of the holder of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan and the holders of the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans with respect to distributions of funds received in respect of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination, and provides, in general, that:

· the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan and the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans are of equal priority with each other and no portion of any of them will have priority or preference over any portion of the others or security therefor;

S-175

· all payments, proceeds and other recoveries on or in respect of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan and the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans will be applied to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan and the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans on a pro rata and pari passu basis according to their respective outstanding principal balances (subject, in each case, to the payment and reimbursement rights of the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer, the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer, the WFCM 2015-C30 Operating Advisor, the WFCM 2015-C30 Certificate Administrator and the WFCM 2015-C30 Trustee) in accordance with the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement and any pooling and servicing agreement governing any securitization of a Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loan; and

· expenses, losses and shortfalls relating to the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination will be allocated, on a pro rata and pari passu basis, to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan and the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a P&I Advance is made with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan, then that P&I Advance, together with interest thereon, may only be reimbursed out of future payments and collections on the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan or, as and to the extent described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances” in this prospectus supplement, on other Mortgage Loans, but not out of payments or other collections on the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans. Similarly, P&I advances on the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans are not reimbursable out of payments or other collections on the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan.

Certain costs and expenses (such as a property protection advance that has been declared non-recoverable) allocable to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan may be paid or reimbursed out of payments and other collections on the mortgage loans in the WFCM 2015-C30 Securitization, subject to the WFCM 2015-C30 Issuing Entity’s right to reimbursement from future payments and other collections on the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan or from general collections on the Mortgage Pool.

Consultation and Control

The Controlling Note Holder under the related Co-Lender Agreement with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination will be the WFCM 2015-C30 Trustee on behalf of the WFCM 2015-C30 Issuing Entity, provided that unless a control termination event exists under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement or the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination is an “excluded mortgage loan” under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the WFCM 2015-C30 Controlling Class Representative will be entitled to exercise the rights of the controlling note holder with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination (such party, the “Somerset Park Apartments Controlling Note Holder”). As such, pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, certain decisions to be made with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination, including certain “major decisions”, as defined in the related Co-Lender Agreement (which are substantially similar in all material respects, but not necessarily identical to the rights of the Controlling Class Representative set forth under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Directing Holder” in this prospectus supplement), pursuant to the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, will require the approval of the Somerset Park Apartments Controlling Note Holder. Generally, during a “subordinate control period” under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, if the Somerset Park Apartments Controlling Note Holder fails to notify the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer of its approval or disapproval of any such decisions or actions within ten business days (or thirty (30) days with respect to an acceptable insurance default) of notice thereof, such decisions or actions will be deemed approved. Pursuant to the terms of the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Somerset Park Apartments Controlling Note Holder will have certain consent and/or consultation rights with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination for so long as it has consent and/or consultation rights with respect to each other mortgage loan included in the WFCM 2015-C30 Issuing Entity (other than any excluded mortgage loan under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement).

Notwithstanding the Somerset Park Apartments Controlling Note Holder’s consent and/or consultation rights described above, the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer or the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer is permitted to implement any major decision before the expiration of the aforementioned ten-business day (or thirty (30) days with respect to an acceptable insurance default) period if it determines that immediate action with respect to such

S-176

decision is necessary to protect the interests of the holders of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan and the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans.

Pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, and unless the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination is an Excluded Mortgage Loan, the Controlling Class Representative, as a non-controlling noteholder (the “Somerset Park Apartments Non-Controlling Note Holder”) will have the right (i) to receive copies of all notices, information and reports, in each case, with respect to any major decisions or the implementation of any recommended actions outlined in an asset status report relating to the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination, that the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer or the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer, as applicable, under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement is required to provide to the Somerset Park Apartments Controlling Note Holder under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement within the same time frame the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer or the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer, as applicable, is required to provide such notices, information and reports to the Somerset Park Apartments Controlling Note Holder and (ii) to be consulted by the Somerset Park Apartments Controlling Note Holder (or the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer or the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer, as applicable, acting on its behalf), on a strictly non-binding basis with respect to certain major decisions as set forth in the related Co-Lender Agreement and the implementation by the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer of any recommended actions outlined in an asset status report; provided, however, such rights will cease to exist during the existence of a “senior consultation period” under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The consultation right of the Somerset Park Apartments Non-Controlling Note Holder will expire ten (10)-business days (or thirty (30) days with respect to an acceptable insurance default) after the delivery by the Somerset Park Apartments Controlling Note Holder (or the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer or the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer, as applicable, acting on its behalf) of notice and information relating to the matter subject to consultation; provided that if a new course of action is proposed that is materially different from the actions previously proposed, the ten (10)-business day (or thirty (30)-day, with respect to an acceptable insurance default) consultation period will begin anew. Notwithstanding the Somerset Park Apartments Non-Controlling Note Holder’s consultation rights described above, the Somerset Park Apartments Controlling Note Holder (or the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer or the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer, as applicable, acting on its behalf) is permitted to implement any major decision or take any action set forth in an asset status report before the expiration of the aforementioned 10-business day (or thirty (30)-day, with respect to an acceptable insurance default) period if it determines that immediate action with respect to such decision is necessary to protect the interests of the holders of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan and the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans. Similarly, such rights as described above are held by the holder of the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans evidenced by the non-controlling note A-1-2 and the non-controlling note A-2-2 (or their representatives).

In addition to the consultation rights of the Somerset Park Apartments Non-Controlling Note Holder described above, the Somerset Park Apartments Non-Controlling Note Holder (unless the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination is an Excluded Mortgage Loan) will have the right to attend annual conference calls with the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer or the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer, as applicable, upon reasonable notice and at times reasonably acceptable to the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer or the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer, as applicable, in which servicing issues related to the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination are discussed.

Neither the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer nor the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer may follow any advice or consultation that would require or cause such parties to violate any applicable law, including the REMIC provisions, be inconsistent with the servicing standard under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, require or cause such parties to violate provisions of the related Co-Lender Agreement or the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, require or cause such parties to violate the terms of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination, or materially expand the scope of any of such parties’ responsibilities under the related Co-Lender Agreement or the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

Application of Penalty Charges

The related Co-Lender Agreement provides that penalty charges paid on the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination will first, be used to reduce, on a pro rata basis, the amounts payable on each of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan and the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans by the amount necessary to reimburse the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer, the WFCM 2015-C30 Trustee or the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer for any interest accrued on any property protection advances and reimbursement of any property protection advances in accordance with the terms of the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, second, be used to reduce the respective amounts payable on each of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage

S-177

Loan and the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans by the amount necessary to pay the Master Servicer, the Trustee, the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer and the WFCM 2015-C30 Trustee for any interest accrued on any P&I Advance (or analogous P&I advance made pursuant to the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement made with respect to such loan by such party (if and as specified in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, as applicable), third, be used to reduce, on a pro rata basis, the amounts payable on each of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan and the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans by the amount necessary to pay additional trust fund expenses (other than special servicing fees, unpaid workout fees and liquidation fees, each as payable under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement) incurred with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination (as specified in the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement) and, finally, in the case of the remaining amount of penalty charges allocable to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan and the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans, be paid to the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer and/or the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer as additional servicing compensation as provided in the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

Sale of Defaulted Loan Combination

Pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, if the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination becomes a “defaulted mortgage loan” pursuant to the terms of the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and thereafter the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer determines, pursuant to the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the related Co-Lender Agreement, to pursue a sale of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan or the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans, then the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer will be required to sell the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan together with the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans as a single whole loan, subject to the satisfaction of certain notice and information delivery requirements and the WFCM 2015-C30 Trustee’s (or any third party hired by the WFCM 2015-C30 Trustee in accordance with the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement) obligation to review whether any offer received from an interested person for the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan and the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans constitutes a fair price. Unless the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination is an Excluded Mortgage Loan, the Somerset Park Apartments Non-Controlling Note Holder will have consultation rights in connection with such sale, as set forth under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans—Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties” in this prospectus supplement. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer will not be permitted to sell the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination if it becomes a defaulted mortgage loan under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement without the written consent of the Issuing Entity (or its representative), as holder of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan, and the holders of the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans evidenced by the non-controlling note A-1-2 and the non-controlling note A-2-2 (or their representatives) unless the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer has delivered to such holders (or their representatives): (a) at least 15 business days’ prior written notice of any decision to attempt to sell the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination; (b) at least ten days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of each bid package (together with any material amendments to such bid packages) received by the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer in connection with any such proposed sale; (c) at least ten days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of the most recent appraisal for the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination, and any documents in the servicing file reasonably requested by the Issuing Entity (or its representative) or the holders of the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans evidenced by the non-controlling note A-1-2 and the non-controlling note A-2-2 (or their representatives) that are material to the price of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination; and (d) until the sale is completed, and a reasonable period of time (but no less time than is afforded to other offerors and the WFCM 2015-C30 Controlling Class Representative) prior to the proposed sale date, all information and other documents being provided to other offerors and all leases or other documents that are approved by the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer or the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer in connection with the proposed sale; provided, that the Issuing Entity (or its representative) or the holders of the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans evidenced by the non-controlling note A-1-2 and the non-controlling note A-2-2 (or their representatives) may waive as to itself any of the delivery or timing requirements set forth in this sentence. The Issuing Entity (or its representative) or the holders of the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans evidenced by the non-controlling note A-1-2 and the non-controlling note A-2-2 (or their representatives) will be permitted to bid at any sale of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination.

S-178

See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans—Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties” in this prospectus supplement.

Special Servicer Appointment Rights

Pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement, the Controlling Note Holder with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination (which, as of any date of determination, will be the WFCM 2015-C30 Trustee on behalf of the WFCM 2015-C30 Issuing Entity, as holder of the controlling Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loan, or its representative which, prior to a control termination event under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, will be the WFCM 2015-C30 Controlling Class Representative) will have the right, with or without cause, to replace the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer then acting with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination and appoint a replacement special servicer in lieu thereof without the consent of the Issuing Entity (or its representative) or the holders of the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans evidenced by the non-controlling note A-1-2 or the non-controlling note A-2-2 (or their representatives). The applicable WFCM 2015-C30 certificateholders with the requisite percentage of voting rights (after a control termination event under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement) will have the right, with or without cause, to replace the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer then acting with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination and appoint a replacement special servicer in lieu thereof without the consent of the Issuing Entity (or its representative) or the holders of the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans evidenced by the non-controlling note A-1-2 or the non-controlling note A-2-2 (or their representatives) in accordance with the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, as described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.

Significant Obligor

Each of (i) the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Illinois Center, securing a Mortgage Loan representing approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, and (ii) the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Hammons Hotel Portfolio, securing a Mortgage Loan representing approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, is a “significant obligor” as such term is used in Items 1101 and 1112 of Regulation AB (“Regulation AB”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) with respect to this offering. See “Structural and Collateral Term Sheet—Illinois Center” and “—Hammons Hotel Portfolio” in Annex B to this prospectus supplement.

Representations and Warranties

Each Sponsor will make, with respect to each Mortgage Loan sold by it that we include in the Issuing Entity, representations and warranties generally to the effect set forth on Annex E-1 to this prospectus supplement, subject to the exceptions set forth on Annex E-2 to this prospectus supplement. Each Sponsor will make such representations and warranties in the related mortgage loan purchase agreement, to be dated as of September 1, 2015 (each, a “Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement”), between the Depositor and the applicable Sponsor.

The representations and warranties:

· do not cover all of the matters that we would review in underwriting a Mortgage Loan;

· should not be viewed as a substitute for a reunderwriting of the Mortgage Loans; and

· in some respects represent an allocation of risk rather than a confirmed description of the Mortgage Loans, although the Sponsors have not made representations and warranties that they know to be untrue, when taking into account the exceptions set forth on Annex E-2 to this prospectus supplement.

If, as provided in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, there exists a breach of any of the above-described representations and warranties made by the applicable Sponsor, and that breach materially and adversely affects the value of the Mortgage Loan (or any related REO Property) or the interests of the Certificateholders in such Mortgage Loan (or any related REO Property), then that breach will be a material breach as to which the Issuing Entity will have the rights against the applicable Sponsor (and, in the case of KGS, also against KGS Holdings,

S-179

L.P. (“KGS Holdings”), as guarantor of the repurchase and substitution obligations of KGS, and in the case of RAIT, also against RAIT Financial Trust (“RFT”), as guarantor of the repurchase and substitution obligations of RAIT) as described under “—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions” below. KGS Holdings will guarantee the repurchase and substitution obligations of KGS under the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, and RFT will guarantee the repurchase and substitution obligations of RAIT under the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement.

We cannot assure you that the applicable Sponsor (or, in the case of KGS, KGS Holdings, as guarantor of the repurchase and substitution obligations of KGS or, in the case of RAIT, RFT, as guarantor of the repurchase and substitution obligations of RAIT) will be able to repurchase or substitute a Mortgage Loan if a representation or warranty has been breached. See “Risk Factors—Sponsors May Not Be Able to Make Required Repurchases or Substitutions of Defective Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.

Sale of Mortgage Loans; Mortgage File Delivery

On the Closing Date, the Depositor will acquire the Mortgage Loans from the Sponsors and will simultaneously transfer the Mortgage Loans, without recourse, to the Trustee for the benefit of the Certificateholders. Under the related transaction documents, the Depositor will direct each Sponsor to deliver to the Trustee or to a document custodian on behalf of the Trustee, among other things, the following documents with respect to each Mortgage Loan (subject to the following sentence with respect to any Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan) sold by the applicable Sponsor and each Serviced Loan Combination (collectively, as to each Mortgage Loan or, if applicable, any related Serviced Loan Combination, the “Mortgage File”): (i)(A) for each Mortgage Loan, the original executed Mortgage Note, endorsed on its face or by allonge attached thereto, without recourse, to the order of the Trustee or in blank (or, if the original Mortgage Note has been lost, an affidavit to such effect from the applicable Sponsor or another prior holder, together with a copy of the Mortgage Note), and (B) for each related Serviced Companion Loan, a copy of the executed promissory note for such Serviced Companion Loan; (ii) the original or a copy of the Mortgage, together with an original or copy of any intervening assignments of the Mortgage, in each case (unless the particular item has not been returned from the applicable recording office) with evidence of recording indicated thereon or certified by the applicable recorder’s office; (iii) the original or a copy of any related assignment of leases (if such item is a document separate from the Mortgage) and of any intervening assignments of such assignment of leases, in each case (unless the particular item has not been returned from the applicable recording office) with evidence of recording indicated thereon or certified by the applicable recorder’s office; (iv) an original executed assignment of the Mortgage in favor of the Trustee or in blank and in recordable form (except for missing recording information not yet available if the instrument being assigned has not been returned from the applicable recording office), or a copy of such assignment if the related Sponsor or its designee, rather than the Trustee, is responsible for recording such assignment; (v) an original assignment of any related assignment of leases (if such item is a document separate from the Mortgage) in favor of the Trustee or in blank and in recordable form (except for missing recording information not yet available if the instrument being assigned has not been returned from the applicable recording office), or a copy of such assignment if the related Sponsor or its designee, rather than the Trustee, is responsible for recording such assignment; (vi) the original assignment of all unrecorded documents relating to the Mortgage Loan (or the related Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable), if not already assigned pursuant to items (iv) or (v) above; (vii) originals or copies of all modification agreements in those instances in which the terms or provisions of the Mortgage or the Mortgage Note have been modified, in each case (unless the particular item has not been returned from the applicable recording office) with evidence of recording indicated thereon if the instrument being modified is a recordable document; (viii) the original or a copy of the policy or certificate of lender’s title insurance issued in connection with such Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) or, if such policy has not been issued or located, an irrevocable, binding commitment (which may be a marked version of the policy that has been executed by an authorized representative of the title company or an agreement to provide the same pursuant to binding escrow instructions executed by an authorized representative of the title company) to issue such title insurance policy; (ix) an original or copy of the related ground lease, if any, and any ground lessor estoppel; (x) an original or copy of the related loan agreement, if any; (xi) an original of any guaranty under such Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable), if any; (xii) an original or copy of the related lockbox agreement or cash management agreement, if any; (xiii) an original or copy of the environmental indemnity from the related borrower, if any; (xiv) an original or copy of the related escrow agreement and the related security agreement (in each case, if such item is a document separate from the related Mortgage); (xv) if not already included in the assignment referred to in clause (vi) above, an original assignment of the related security agreement (if such item is a document separate from the related Mortgage) in favor of the Trustee; (xvi) in the case of each Loan Combination, an original or a copy of the related Co-Lender Agreement; (xvii) any filed copies

S-180

(bearing evidence of filing) or evidence of filing of any UCC financing statements in favor of the originator of such Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) or in favor of any assignee prior to the Trustee and UCC-3 assignment financing statements in favor of the Trustee or a copy of such assignment financing statements; (xviii) an original or copy of any mezzanine loan intercreditor agreement if any; (xix) the original or copy of any related environmental insurance policy; (xx) a copy of any related letter of credit and any related assignment thereof (with the original to be delivered to the Master Servicer); and (xxi) copies of any related franchise agreement, property management agreement or hotel management agreement and related comfort letters and/or estoppel letters, and any related assignment thereof. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this prospectus supplement, in the case of an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, the preceding document delivery requirement will be deemed satisfied by the delivery by the related Sponsor of, with respect to clause (i), executed originals of the related documents and, with respect to clauses (ii) through (xxi) above, a copy of the mortgage file related to the applicable Outside Serviced Companion Loan delivered under the Outside Servicing Agreement.

As provided in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Trustee, a custodian on its behalf, or another appropriate party as described in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement is required to review each Mortgage File within a specified period following its receipt of such Mortgage File. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Reports to Certificateholders; Available Information” in this prospectus supplement.

Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions

If there exists a Material Breach of any of the representations and warranties made by a Sponsor with respect to any of the Mortgage Loans sold by it, as discussed under “—Representations and Warranties” above and as set forth on Annex E-1 to this prospectus supplement, or if there exists a Material Document Defect with respect to any Mortgage Loan sold by it, then the applicable Sponsor will be required to remedy that Material Breach or Material Document Defect, as the case may be, in all material respects, or if such Material Breach or Material Document Defect, as the case may be, cannot be cured within the time periods set forth in the applicable Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, then the applicable Sponsor will be required to either:

· within two years following the Closing Date, substitute a Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan and pay any shortfall amount equal to the difference between the Repurchase Price of the Mortgage Loan calculated as of the date of substitution and the scheduled principal balance of the Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan as of the due date in the month of substitution; or

· to repurchase the affected Mortgage Loan (or any related REO Property) at a price (the “Repurchase Price”) generally equal to the sum of—

(i) the outstanding principal balance of that Mortgage Loan at the time of purchase less any portion of any Loss of Value Payment attributable to that Mortgage Loan and available to reduce the outstanding principal balance; plus

(ii) all outstanding interest, other than default interest or Excess Interest, due with respect to that Mortgage Loan pursuant to the related Mortgage Loan documents through the due date in the collection period of purchase; plus

(iii) all unreimbursed property protection advances relating to that Mortgage Loan; plus

(iv) all outstanding interest accrued on advances made by the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and/or the Trustee with respect to that Mortgage Loan; plus

(v) to the extent not otherwise covered by clause (iv) of this bullet, all outstanding Special Servicing Fees and other additional expenses of the Issuing Entity outstanding or previously incurred related to that Mortgage Loan; plus

(vi) any Liquidation Fee if and to the extent payable in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

S-181

With respect to the KGS Mortgage Loans, KGS Holdings, the parent of KGS, will guarantee the repurchase obligations of KGS under the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement in the event KGS fails to perform its obligations to repurchase or substitute a Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan for the affected Mortgage Loan and pay any substitution shortfall amount in response to a Material Document Defect or Material Breach. With respect to the RAIT Mortgage Loans, RFT, the parent of RAIT, will guarantee the repurchase obligations of RAIT under the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement in the event RAIT fails to perform its obligations to repurchase or substitute a Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan for the affected Mortgage Loan and pay any substitution shortfall amount in response to a Material Document Defect or Material Breach.

In addition, each Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement provides that, with respect to each Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, if a “material document defect” (as such term or any analogous term is defined in the related Outside Servicing Agreement) exists under the related Outside Servicing Agreement with respect to the related Pari Passu Companion Loan that is included in the related Outside Securitization, and if such Pari Passu Companion Loan is repurchased from such Outside Securitization as a result of such “material document defect” (as such term or any analogous term is defined in the related Outside Servicing Agreement), then the applicable Sponsor will be required to repurchase such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan; provided, however, that such repurchase obligation does not apply to any “material document defect” (as such term or any analogous term is defined in the related Outside Servicing Agreement) related solely to the promissory note for the subject Pari Passu Companion Loan.

A “Material Breach” is a breach of a representation or warranty that materially and adversely affects the value of the affected Mortgage Loan (or any related REO Property) or the interests of the Certificateholders in the affected Mortgage Loan (or any related REO Property) or causes any Mortgage Loan to fail to be a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3).

A “Material Document Defect” is a document defect that materially and adversely affects the value of the affected Mortgage Loan (or any related REO Property) or the interests of the Certificateholders in the affected Mortgage Loan (or any related REO Property) or causes any Mortgage Loan to fail to be a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3). Subject to the applicable Sponsor’s right to cure, failure of such Sponsor to deliver the documents referred to in clauses (i), (ii), (viii), (ix), (xx) and (xxi) in the definition of “Mortgage File” under “—Sale of Mortgage Loans; Mortgage File Delivery” above for any Mortgage Loan will be deemed a Material Document Defect; provided, however, that no document defect (except such a deemed Material Document Defect) will be considered to be a Material Document Defect unless the document with respect to which the document defect exists is required in connection with an imminent enforcement of the lender’s rights or remedies under the related Mortgage Loan, defending any claim asserted by any borrower or third party with respect to the Mortgage Loan, establishing the validity or priority of any lien on any collateral securing the Mortgage Loan or for any immediate significant servicing obligation.

A “Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan” is a mortgage loan that must, on the date of substitution: (a) have an outstanding principal balance, after application of all scheduled payments of principal and interest due during or prior to the month of substitution, whether or not received, not in excess of the Stated Principal Balance of the deleted Mortgage Loan as of the due date in the calendar month during which the substitution occurs; (b) have a Mortgage Loan Rate not less than the Mortgage Loan Rate of the deleted Mortgage Loan; (c) have the same due date as and a grace period no longer than that of the deleted Mortgage Loan; (d) accrue interest on the same basis as the deleted Mortgage Loan (for example, on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months); (e) have a remaining term to stated maturity not greater than, and not more than two years less than, the remaining term to stated maturity of the deleted Mortgage Loan; (f) have a then-current loan-to-value ratio equal to or less than the lesser of (i) the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio for the deleted Mortgage Loan and (ii) 75%, in each case using a “value” for the Mortgaged Property as determined using an appraisal from an Appraiser in accordance with MAI standards; (g) comply (except in a manner that would not be adverse to the interests of the Certificateholders) as of the date of substitution in all material respects with all of the representations and warranties set forth in the applicable Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement; (h) have an environmental report that indicates no material adverse environmental conditions with respect to the related Mortgaged Property that will be delivered as a part of the related servicing file; (i) have a then-current debt service coverage ratio at least equal to the greater of (i) the debt service coverage ratio of the deleted Mortgage Loan as of the Closing Date and (ii) 1.25x; (j) constitute a “qualified replacement mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(4) as evidenced by an opinion of counsel (provided at the applicable Sponsor’s expense); (k) not have a maturity date or an amortization period that extends to a date that is after the date that is three years prior to the Rated Final Distribution Date; (l) have prepayment restrictions comparable to those of the deleted Mortgage Loan; (m) not be

S-182

substituted for a deleted Mortgage Loan unless the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator have received a prior Rating Agency Confirmation from each Rating Agency (the cost, if any, of obtaining the Rating Agency Confirmation to be paid by the applicable Sponsor); (n) have been approved, so long as a Consultation Termination Event has not occurred and is not continuing, by the Controlling Class Representative; (o) prohibit defeasance within two years of the Closing Date; (p) not be substituted for a deleted Mortgage Loan if it would result in the termination of the REMIC status of either Trust REMIC or the imposition of tax on either Trust REMIC other than a tax on income expressly permitted or contemplated to be imposed by the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, as determined by an opinion of counsel; (q) have an engineering report with respect to the related Mortgaged Property which will be delivered as a part of the related servicing file; and (r) be current in the payment of all scheduled payments of principal and interest then due. In the event that more than one Mortgage Loan is substituted for a deleted Mortgage Loan or Mortgage Loans, then (x) the amounts described in clause (a) are required to be determined on the basis of aggregate principal balances and (y) each proposed substitute Mortgage Loan must individually satisfy each of the requirements specified in clauses (b) through (r) of the preceding sentence, except (z) the rates described in clause (b) above and the remaining term to stated maturity referred to in clause (e) above are required to be determined on a weighted average basis; provided that no individual Mortgage Loan Rate (net of the related Administrative Fee Rate) may be lower than the highest fixed Pass-Through Rate (not subject to a cap equal to, or based on, the WAC Rate) of any Class of Sequential Pay Certificates or Trust Component having a principal balance then outstanding. When one or more Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loans are substituted for a deleted Mortgage Loan, the applicable Sponsor will be required to certify that the replacement mortgage loan(s) meet(s) all of the requirements of the above definition and send the certification to the Certificate Administrator and the Trustee and, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, to the Controlling Class Representative.

The time period within which the applicable Sponsor must complete that remedy, repurchase or substitution will generally be limited to 90 days following the earlier of the applicable Sponsor’s discovery or receipt of notice of, and receipt of a demand to take action with respect to, the related Material Breach or Material Document Defect, as the case may be (or, in the case of a Material Breach or Material Document Defect relating to a Mortgage Loan not being a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3), 90 days from any party discovering such Material Breach or Material Document Defect). However, if the applicable Sponsor is diligently attempting to correct the problem, then, with limited exception (including if such breach or defect would cause the Mortgage Loan not to be a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3)), it will be entitled to an additional 90 days (or more in the case of a Material Document Defect resulting from the failure of the responsible party to have received the recorded documents) to complete that remedy, repurchase or substitution.

Notwithstanding the foregoing discussion, in lieu of the applicable Sponsor performing its obligations with respect to any Material Breach or Material Document Defect as described above, to the extent that the applicable Sponsor and the Special Servicer on behalf of the Trust, and with the consent of the Controlling Class Representative (other than with respect to an Excluded Mortgage Loan) prior to the occurrence of a Control Termination Event, are able to agree upon a cash payment payable by the applicable Sponsor to the Issuing Entity that would be deemed sufficient to compensate the Issuing Entity for a Material Breach or Material Document Defect (a “Loss of Value Payment”), the applicable Sponsor may elect, in its sole discretion, to pay such Loss of Value Payment to the Issuing Entity; provided that a Material Document Defect or a Material Breach as a result of a Mortgage Loan not constituting a “qualified mortgage”, within the meaning of Section 860G(a)(3) of the Code, may not be cured by a Loss of Value Payment. Upon its making such payment, the applicable Sponsor will be deemed to have cured such Material Breach or Material Document Defect in all respects. The making of a Loss of Value Payment will be the sole remedy available to the Certificateholders, or the Trustee on behalf of the Certificateholders, regarding any Material Breach or Material Document Defect in respect of which such Loss of Value Payment was accepted, and the applicable Sponsor will not be obligated to repurchase or replace the affected Mortgage Loan or otherwise cure such Material Breach or Material Document Defect.

If (x) a Mortgage Loan is to be repurchased or replaced as described above (a “Defective Mortgage Loan”), (y) such Defective Mortgage Loan is part of a Crossed Group and (z) the applicable document defect or breach does not constitute a Material Document Defect or Material Breach, as the case may be, as to the other Mortgage Loan(s) that are a part of such Crossed Group (the “Other Crossed Loans”) (without regard to this paragraph), then the applicable document defect or breach (as the case may be) will be deemed to constitute a Material Document Defect or Material Breach (as the case may be) as to each such Other Crossed Loan for purposes of the above provisions, and the applicable Sponsor will be obligated to repurchase or replace each such Other Crossed Loan in accordance with the provisions above unless the applicable Sponsor satisfies certain conditions

S-183

set forth in the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, including, without limitation, that (i) the applicable Sponsor has delivered an opinion that the repurchase of solely the Defective Mortgage Loan will not cause the Issuing Entity to fail to qualify as one or more REMICs or any portion of the Issuing Entity to fail to qualify as a Grantor Trust, and (ii) if the applicable Sponsor were to repurchase or replace only the Defective Mortgage Loan and not the Other Crossed Loans, (x) certain debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value ratio tests for the Other Crossed Loans (as specified in the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement) would be met, and (y) either the exercise of remedies against the primary collateral of any Mortgage Loan in the Crossed Group will not impair the ability to exercise remedies against the primary collateral of the other Mortgage Loan(s) in the Crossed Group or the related Mortgage Loan documents have been modified in a manner that removes any threat of impairment of the ability to exercise remedies against the primary collateral of the other Mortgage Loan(s) in the Crossed Group as a result of the exercise of remedies against the primary collateral of any Mortgage Loan in the Crossed Group. The Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, will be entitled to cause to be delivered, or direct the applicable Sponsor to (in which case the applicable Sponsor is required to) cause to be delivered, to the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, an appraisal of any or all of the related Mortgaged Properties for purposes of determining whether the condition set forth above has been satisfied, in each case at the expense of the applicable Sponsor if the scope and cost of the appraisal is approved by the applicable Sponsor and, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Controlling Class Representative (such approval not to be unreasonably withheld in each case). With respect to any Defective Mortgage Loan that forms a part of a Crossed Group and as to which the conditions described in the first sentence of this paragraph are satisfied, such that the Issuing Entity will continue to hold the Other Crossed Loans, the applicable Sponsor and the Depositor (as predecessor in interest to the Issuing Entity with respect to the subject Crossed Group) have agreed to forbear from enforcing any remedies against the other’s primary collateral but each is permitted to exercise remedies against the primary collateral securing its respective Mortgage Loan(s). If the exercise of remedies by one such party would impair the ability of the other such party to exercise its remedies with respect to the primary collateral securing the Mortgage Loan(s) held by the other such party, then both parties will forbear from exercising such remedies unless and until the related Mortgage Loan documents can be modified to remove the threat of impairment as a result of the exercise of remedies. Any reserve or other cash collateral or letters of credit securing any of the Mortgage Loans that form a Crossed Group will be allocated between such Mortgage Loans in accordance with the related Mortgage Loan documents, or otherwise on a pro rata basis based upon their outstanding principal balances.

The cure, repurchase and substitution obligations described above, including any Loss of Value Payment constituting a deemed cure as described above, will constitute the sole remedy available to the Certificateholders in connection with a Material Breach of any representation or warranty or a Material Document Defect with respect to any Mortgage Loan in the Issuing Entity. None of the Depositor, the underwriters, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Operating Advisor, any other Sponsor or any other person will be obligated to repurchase any affected Mortgage Loan in connection with a Material Breach of any of the representations and warranties or a Material Document Defect if the applicable Sponsor (or, in the case of a KGS Mortgage Loan, KGS Holdings, as guarantor of the repurchase and substitution obligations of KGS or, in the case of a RAIT Mortgage Loan, RFT, as guarantor of the repurchase and substitution obligations of RAIT) defaults on its obligations to do so. We cannot assure you that the applicable Sponsor (or, in the case of a KGS Mortgage Loan, KGS Holdings, as guarantor of the repurchase and substitution obligations of KGS or, in the case of a RAIT Mortgage Loan, RFT, as guarantor of the repurchase and substitution obligations of RAIT) will have sufficient assets to repurchase or substitute a Mortgage Loan if required to do so.

The “Rated Final Distribution Date” for each Class of Offered Certificates will be the Distribution Date in September 2058.

Additional Information

A Current Report on Form 8-K (“Form 8-K”) will be available to purchasers of the Offered Certificates and will be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), together with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or prior to the date of the filing of this prospectus supplement.

S-184

Transaction Parties

The Sponsors

Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp., Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC, KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC and RAIT Funding, LLC are the sponsors of this securitization transaction and, accordingly, are referred to as the “Sponsors” in this prospectus supplement.

Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.

General

Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (“CGMRC”) is a Sponsor. CGMRC is a New York corporation organized in 1979 and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citicorp Banking Corporation, a Delaware corporation, which is in turn a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup Inc., a Delaware corporation. CGMRC maintains its principal office at 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013, Attention: Mortgage Finance Group. Its facsimile number is (212) 723-8604. CGMRC is an affiliate of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., the depositor, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., one of the underwriters, and Citibank, N.A., the Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar and paying agent. CGMRC makes, and purchases from lenders, commercial and multifamily mortgage loans primarily for the purpose of securitizing them in CMBS transactions. CGMRC also purchases and finances residential mortgage loans, consumer receivables and other financial assets.

Neither CGMRC nor any of its affiliates will insure or guarantee distributions on the Certificates. The Certificateholders will have no rights or remedies against CGMRC for any losses or other claims in connection with the Certificates or the Mortgage Loans except in respect of the repurchase and substitution obligations for material document defects or material breaches of the representations and warranties made by CGMRC in the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions” in this prospectus supplement.

CGMRC’s Commercial Mortgage Origination and Securitization Program

CGMRC, directly or through correspondents or affiliates, originates multifamily and commercial mortgage loans throughout the United States and abroad. CGMRC has been engaged in the origination of multifamily and commercial mortgage loans for securitization since 1996 and has been involved in the securitization of residential mortgage loans since 1987. The multifamily and commercial mortgage loans originated by CGMRC include both fixed rate loans and floating rate loans. Most of the multifamily and commercial mortgage loans included by CGMRC in commercial mortgage securitizations sponsored by CGMRC have been originated, directly or through correspondents, by CGMRC or an affiliate. CGMRC securitized approximately $1.25 billion, $1.49 billion, $2.60 billion, $4.27 billion, $7.02 billion, $6.35 billion, $1.08 billion, $0, $517 million, $1.25 billion, $1.73 billion, $4.75 billion and $5.23 billion of multifamily and commercial mortgage loans in public and private offerings during the calendar years 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively.

In addition, in the normal course of its business, CGMRC may also acquire multifamily and commercial mortgage loans from various third-party originators. These mortgage loans may have been originated using underwriting guidelines not established by CGMRC.

CGMRC has also sponsored, in private placement transactions, multifamily and commercial mortgage loans which it either originated or acquired from third-party originators that underwrote them to their own underwriting criteria.

In connection with the commercial mortgage securitization transactions in which it participates, CGMRC generally transfers the subject mortgage assets to a depositor, who then transfers those mortgage assets to the issuing entity for the related securitization. In return for the transfer of the subject mortgage assets by the depositor to the issuing entity, the issuing entity issues commercial mortgage pass-through certificates that are in whole or in part backed by, and supported by the cash flows generated by, those mortgage assets.

S-185

CGMRC generally works with rating agencies, unaffiliated mortgage loan sellers, servicers, affiliates and underwriters in structuring a securitization transaction. CGMRC will generally act as a sponsor, originator or mortgage loan seller in the commercial mortgage securitization transactions in which it participates. In such transactions there may be a co-sponsor and/or other mortgage loan sellers and originators. Generally CGMRC and/or the related depositor contract with other entities to service the multifamily and commercial mortgage loans following their transfer into a trust fund for a series of certificates.

Review of CGMRC Mortgage Loans

General. In connection with the preparation of this prospectus supplement, CGMRC conducted a review of the Mortgage Loans that it is selling to the Depositor. The review was conducted as set forth below and was conducted with respect to each of the CGMRC Mortgage Loans. No sampling procedures were used in the review process.

Database. First, CGMRC created a database of information (the “CGMRC Securitization Database”) obtained in connection with the origination of the CGMRC Mortgage Loans, including:

· certain information from the CGMRC Mortgage Loan documents;

· certain information from the rent rolls and operating statements for, and certain leases relating to, the related Mortgaged Properties (in each case to the extent applicable);

· insurance information for the related Mortgaged Properties;

· information from third party reports such as the appraisals, environmental and property condition reports, seismic reports, zoning reports and other zoning information;

· bankruptcy searches with respect to the related borrowers; and

· certain information and other search results obtained by the CGMRC deal team for each of the CGMRC Mortgage Loans during the underwriting process.

CGMRC also included in the CGMRC Securitization Database certain updates to such information received by the CGMRC securitization team after origination, such as information from the interim servicer regarding loan payment status and current escrows, updated rent rolls and leasing activity information provided pursuant to the Mortgage Loan documents, and information otherwise brought to the attention of the CGMRC securitization team. Such updates were not intended to be, and do not serve as, a re-underwriting of any Mortgage Loan.

Using the information in the CGMRC Securitization Database, CGMRC created a Microsoft Excel file (the “CGMRC Data File”) and provided that file to the Depositor for the inclusion in this prospectus supplement (particularly in Annexes A, B and C to this prospectus supplement) of information regarding the CGMRC Mortgage Loans.

Data Comparison and Recalculation. CGMRC engaged a third-party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures designed by CGMRC, relating to information in this prospectus supplement regarding the CGMRC Mortgage Loans. These procedures included:

· comparing the information in the CGMRC Data File against various source documents provided by CGMRC that are described above under “—Database”;

· comparing numerical information regarding the CGMRC Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus supplement against the CGMRC Data File; and

· recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the CGMRC Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus supplement.

S-186

Legal Review. CGMRC also reviewed and responded to a Due Diligence Questionnaire (as defined below) relating to the CGMRC Mortgage Loans, which questionnaire was prepared by the Depositor’s legal counsel for use in eliciting information relating to the CGMRC Mortgage Loans and including such information in this prospectus supplement to the extent material.

Although the Due Diligence Questionnaire may be revised from time to time, it typically contains various questions regarding the CGMRC Mortgage Loans, the related Mortgaged Properties, the related borrowers, sponsors and tenants, and any related additional debt. For example, the due diligence questionnaire (a “Due Diligence Questionnaire”) may seek to elicit, among other things, the following information:

· whether any mortgage loans were originated by third party originators and the names of such originators, and whether such mortgage loans were underwritten or re-underwritten in accordance with CGMRC’s (or the applicable mortgage loan seller’s) criteria;

· whether any mortgage loans are not first liens, or have a loan-to-value ratio greater than 80%;

· whether any mortgage loans are 30 days or more delinquent with respect to any monthly debt service payment as of the cut-off date or have been 30 days or more delinquent at any time during the 12-month period immediately preceding the cut-off date;

· a description of any material issues with respect to any of the mortgage loans;

· whether any mortgage loans permit, or have existing, mezzanine debt, additional debt secured by the related mortgaged properties or other material debt, and the material terms and conditions for such debt;

· whether any mortgaged properties have additional debt that is included in another securitization transaction and information related to such other securitization transaction;

· whether intercreditor agreements, subordination and standstill agreements or similar agreements are in place with respect to secured debt, mezzanine debt or additional debt and the terms of such agreements;

· a list of any mortgage loans that are interest-only for their entire term or a portion of their term;

· a list of mortgage loans that permit prepayment or defeasance (in whole or in part), or provide for yield maintenance, and the types of prepayment lock-out provisions and prepayment charges that apply;

· whether any mortgage loans permit the release of all or a portion of the related mortgaged properties, and the material terms of any partial release, substitution and condemnation/casualty provisions;

· a list of mortgage loans that are cross-collateralized or secured by multiple properties, or that have related borrowers with other mortgage loans in the subject securitization;

· whether any mortgage loans have a right of first refusal or right of first offer or similar options, in favor of a tenant or any other party;

· whether there are post-close escrows or earn-out reserves that could be used to pay down the mortgage loan, or whether there are escrows or holdbacks that have not been fully funded;

· information regarding lockbox arrangements, grace periods, interest accrual and amortization provisions, non-recourse carveouts, and any other material provisions with respect to the mortgage loan;

S-187

· whether the borrower or sponsor of any related borrower has been subject to bankruptcy proceedings, or has a past or present material criminal charge or record;

· whether any borrower is not a special purpose entity;

· whether any borrowers or sponsors of related borrowers have been subject to litigation or similar proceedings and the material terms thereof;

· whether any borrower under a mortgage loan is affiliated with a borrower under another Mortgage Loan to be included in the issuing entity;

· whether any of the mortgage loans is a leasehold mortgage, the terms of the related ground lease, and whether the term of the related ground lease extends at least 20 years beyond the stated loan maturity;

· a list of any related Mortgaged Properties for which a single tenant occupies over 20% of such property, and whether there are any significant lease rollovers at a particular Mortgaged Property;

· a list of any significant tenant concentrations or material tenant issues, e.g., dark tenants, subsidized tenants, government or student tenants, or Section 8 tenants, etc.;

· a description of any material leasing issues at the related Mortgaged Properties;

· whether any related Mortgaged Properties are subject to condemnation proceedings or litigation;

· a list of related Mortgaged Properties for which a Phase I environmental site assessment has not been completed, or for which a Phase II was performed, and whether any environmental site assessment reveals any material adverse environmental condition or circumstance at any related Mortgaged Property except for those which will be remediated by the cut-off date;

· whether there is any terrorism, earthquake, tornado, flood, fire or hurricane damage with respect to any of the related Mortgaged Properties, or whether there are any zoning issues at the Mortgaged Properties;

· a list of Mortgaged Properties for which an engineering inspection has not been completed and whether any property inspection revealed material issues; and/or

· general information regarding property type, condition, use, plans for renovation, etc.

CGMRC also provided to origination counsel the Sponsor representations and warranties attached as Annex E-1 to this prospectus supplement and requested that origination counsel identify exceptions to such representations and warranties. CGMRC compiled and reviewed the draft exceptions received from origination counsel, engaged separate counsel to review the exceptions, revised the exceptions and provided them to the Depositor for inclusion on Annex E-2 to this prospectus supplement. In addition, for each CGMRC Mortgage Loan originated by CGMRC or its affiliates, CGMRC prepared and delivered to its securitization counsel for review an asset summary, which summary includes important loan terms and certain property level information obtained during the origination process. The loan terms included in each asset summary may include, without limitation, the principal amount, the interest rate, the loan term, the interest calculation method, the due date, any applicable interest-only period, any applicable amortization period, a summary of any prepayment and/or defeasance provisions, a summary of any lockbox and/or cash management provisions, a summary of any release provisions, and a summary of any requirement for the related borrower to fund up-front and/or on-going reserves. The property level information obtained during the origination process included in each asset summary may include, without limitation, a description of the related Mortgaged Property (including property type, ownership structure, use, location, size, renovations, age and physical attributes), information relating to the commercial real estate market in which the Mortgaged Property is located, information relating to the related borrower and sponsor of the related borrower, an underwriter’s assessment of strengths and risks of the loan transaction, tenant analysis, and summaries of third party reports such as appraisal, environmental and property condition reports.

S-188

For each CGMRC Mortgage Loan, if any, purchased by CGMRC or its affiliates from a third-party originator of such Mortgage Loan, CGMRC reviewed the purchase agreement and related representations and warranties, and exceptions to those representations and warranties, made by the seller of such CGMRC Mortgage Loan to CGMRC or its affiliates, reviewed certain provisions of the related Mortgage Loan documents and third party reports concerning the related mortgaged property provided by the originator of such Mortgage Loan, prepared exceptions to the representations and warranties in the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement based upon such review, and provided them to the Depositor for inclusion on Annex E-2 to this prospectus supplement. With respect to any CGMRC Mortgage Loan that is purchased by CGMRC or its affiliates from a third party originator, the representations and warranties made by the third party originator in the related purchase agreement between CGMRC or its affiliates, on the one hand, and the third party originator, on the other hand, are solely for the benefit of CGMRC or its affiliates. The rights, if any, that CGMRC or its affiliates may have under such purchase agreement upon a breach of such representations and warranties made by the third party originator will not be assigned to the trustee, and the certificateholders and the trustee will not have any recourse against the third party originator in connection with any breach of the representations and warranties made by such third party originator. As described above under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions”, the substitution or repurchase obligation of CGMRC, as mortgage loan seller, with respect to the CGMRC Mortgage Loans under the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement constitutes the sole remedy available to the Certificateholders and the Trustee for any uncured material breach of any CGMRC’s representations and warranties regarding the CGMRC Mortgage Loans, including any CGMRC Mortgage Loan that are purchased by CGMRC or its affiliates from a third party originator.

In addition, with respect to each CGMRC Mortgage Loan, CGMRC reviewed, and in certain cases requested that its counsel review, certain Mortgage Loan document provisions as necessary for disclosure of such provisions in this prospectus supplement, such as property release provisions and other provisions specifically disclosed in this prospectus supplement.

Certain Updates. Furthermore, CGMRC requested the borrowers under the CGMRC Mortgage Loans (or the borrowers’ respective counsel) for updates on any significant pending litigation that existed at origination. Moreover, if CGMRC became aware of a significant natural disaster in the vicinity of a Mortgaged Property relating to a CGMRC Mortgage Loan, CGMRC requested information on the property status from the related borrower in order to confirm whether any material damage to the property had occurred.

Large Loan Summaries. Finally, CGMRC prepared, and reviewed with originating counsel and/or securitization counsel, the loan summaries for those of the CGMRC Mortgage Loans included in the 10 largest Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan) in the mortgage pool, and the abbreviated loan summaries for those of the CGMRC Mortgage Loans included in the next 10 largest Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan) in the mortgage pool, which loan summaries and abbreviated loan summaries are incorporated in the “Structural and Collateral Term Sheet” in Annex B to this prospectus supplement.

Findings and Conclusions. Based on the foregoing review procedures, CGMRC found and concluded that the disclosure regarding the CGMRC Mortgage Loans in this prospectus supplement is accurate in all material respects. CGMRC also found and concluded that the CGMRC Mortgage Loans were originated in accordance with CGMRC’s origination procedures and underwriting criteria, except for any material deviations described under “—The Originators—Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.—Exceptions to Underwriting Criteria” in this prospectus supplement. CGMRC attributes to itself all findings and conclusions resulting from the foregoing review procedures.

Repurchase Requests

CGMRC most recently filed a Form ABS-15G on February 17, 2015. CGMRC’s Central Index Key is 0001541001. With respect to the period from and including July 1, 2012 to and including June 30, 2015, CGMRC does not have any activity to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to repurchase or replacement requests in connection with breaches of representations and warranties made by it as a sponsor of commercial mortgage securitizations.

S-189

Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company

General

Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company (“GSMC”) is a Sponsor. GSMC is a New York limited partnership. GSMC was formed in 1984. Its general partner is Goldman Sachs Real Estate Funding Corp. and its limited partner is Goldman Sachs Bank USA. GSMC’s executive offices are located at 200 West Street, New York, New York 10282, telephone number (212) 902-1000. GSMC is an affiliate of GS Commercial Real Estate LP, an Originator, and an affiliate of Goldman, Sachs & Co., one of the underwriters.

GSMC’s Commercial Mortgage Securitization Program

As a sponsor, GSMC originates and acquires fixed- and floating-rate commercial mortgage loans and either by itself or together with other sponsors or mortgage loan sellers, organizes and initiates the public and/or private securitization of such commercial mortgage loans by transferring the commercial mortgage loans to a securitization depositor, including GS Commercial Securities Corporation II or another entity that acts in a similar capacity. In coordination with its affiliates, GS Commercial Real Estate LP and other unaffiliated underwriters, GSMC works with rating agencies, investors, unaffiliated mortgage loan sellers and servicers in structuring the securitization transaction.

From the beginning of its participation in commercial mortgage securitization programs in 1996 through December 31, 2014, GSMC originated or acquired approximately 2,374 fixed and floating rate commercial and multifamily mortgage loans with an aggregate original principal balance of approximately $78.5 billion. As of December 31, 2014, GSMC had acted as a sponsor and mortgage loan seller on 100 fixed and floating-rate commercial mortgage-backed securitization transactions. GSMC securitized approximately $2.165 billion, $4.636 billion, $6.586 billion and $5.098 billion of commercial mortgage loans in public and private offerings in calendar years 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively.

Neither GSMC nor any of its affiliates will insure or guarantee distributions on the Certificates. The Certificateholders will have no rights or remedies against GSMC for any losses or other claims in connection with the Certificates or the Mortgage Loans except in respect of the repurchase and substitution obligations for material document defects or the material breaches of representations and warranties made by GSMC in the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions” in this prospectus supplement.

Review of GSMC Mortgage Loans

Overview. GSMC, in its capacity as the Sponsor of the GSMC Mortgage Loans, has conducted a review of the GSMC Mortgage Loans in connection with the securitization described in this prospectus supplement. The review of the GSMC Mortgage Loans was performed by a deal team comprised of real estate and securitization professionals who are employees of one or more of GSMC’s affiliates (the “GSMC Deal Team”). The review procedures described below were employed with respect to all of the GSMC Mortgage Loans, except that certain review procedures only were relevant to the large loan disclosures in this prospectus supplement, as further described below. No sampling procedures were used in the review process.

Database. To prepare for securitization, members of the GSMC Deal Team created a database of loan-level and property-level information relating to each GSMC Mortgage Loan. The database was compiled from, among other sources, the related Mortgage Loan documents, Third Party Reports, zoning reports, insurance policies, borrower supplied information (including, but not limited to, rent rolls, leases, operating statements and budgets) and information collected by the Goldman Originators during the underwriting process. After origination of each GSMC Mortgage Loan, the GSMC Deal Team updated the information in the database with respect to the GSMC Mortgage Loan based on updates provided by the related servicer relating to loan payment status and escrows, updated operating statements, rent rolls and leasing activity, and information otherwise brought to the attention of the GSMC Deal Team.

A data tape (the “GSMC Data Tape”) containing detailed information regarding each GSMC Mortgage Loan was created from the information in the database referred to in the prior paragraph. The GSMC Data Tape was used by the GSMC Deal Team to provide certain numerical information regarding the GSMC Mortgage Loans in this prospectus supplement.

S-190

Data Comparison and Recalculation. GSMC engaged a third-party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures designed by GSMC, relating to information in this prospectus supplement regarding the GSMC Mortgage Loans. These procedures included:

· comparing certain information in the GSMC Data Tape against various source documents provided by GSMC that are described above under “—Database”;

· comparing numerical information regarding the GSMC Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus supplement against the GSMC Data Tape; and

· recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the GSMC Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus supplement.

Legal Review. GSMC engaged various law firms to conduct certain legal reviews of the GSMC Mortgage Loans for disclosure in this prospectus supplement. In anticipation of the securitization of each GSMC Mortgage Loan, origination counsel prepared a loan and property summary that sets forth salient loan terms and summarizes material deviations from GSMC’s standard form loan documents. In addition, origination counsel for each GSMC Mortgage Loan reviewed GSMC’s representations and warranties set forth on Annex E-1 to this prospectus supplement and, if applicable, identified exceptions to those representations and warranties.

Securitization counsel was also engaged to assist in the review of the GSMC Mortgage Loans. Such assistance included, among other things, (i) a review of sections of the loan agreement relating to certain GSMC Mortgage Loans marked against the standard form document, (ii) a review of the loan and property summaries referred to above relating to the GSMC Mortgage Loans prepared by origination counsel and (iii) a review of a Due Diligence Questionnaire completed by the GSMC Deal Team. Securitization counsel also reviewed the property release provisions, if any, for each GSMC Mortgage Loan with multiple Mortgaged Properties for compliance with the REMIC provisions of the Code. In addition, for each GSMC Mortgage Loan originated by GSMC or its affiliates, GSMC prepared and delivered to its securitization counsel for review an asset summary, which summary includes important loan terms and certain property level information obtained during the origination process.

Origination counsel or securitization counsel also assisted in the preparation of the Mortgage Loan summaries set forth under “Structural and Collateral Term Sheet—Hammons Hotel Portfolio”, “—Hamilton Landing”, “—Courtyard Sunnyvale”, “—Pavilion Jenkintown”, “—Mix at Midtown”, “—Peckham Square” and “—Dover Marketplace” in Annex B to this prospectus supplement, based on their respective reviews of pertinent sections of the related Mortgage Loan documents. The applicable borrowers and borrowers’ counsel reviewed these Mortgage Loan summaries as well.

Other Review Procedures. With respect to any pending litigation that existed at the origination of any GSMC Mortgage Loan, GSMC requested updates from the related borrower, origination counsel and/or borrower’s litigation counsel. GSMC conducted a search with respect to each borrower under a GSMC Mortgage Loan to determine whether it filed for bankruptcy after origination of the GSMC Mortgage Loan. If GSMC became aware of a significant natural disaster in the vicinity of any Mortgaged Property securing a GSMC Mortgage Loan, GSMC obtained information on the status of the Mortgaged Property from the related borrower to confirm no material damage to the Mortgaged Property.

The GSMC Deal Team also consulted with the Goldman Originators to confirm that the GSMC Mortgage Loans were originated in compliance with the origination and underwriting criteria described below under “—The Originators—The Goldman Originators—Origination and Underwriting Process”, as well as to identify any material deviations from those origination and underwriting criteria. See “—The Originators—The Goldman Originators—Exceptions to Underwriting Criteria” below.

Findings and Conclusions. Based on the foregoing review procedures, GSMC determined that the disclosure regarding the GSMC Mortgage Loans in this prospectus supplement is accurate in all material respects. GSMC also determined that the GSMC Mortgage Loans were originated in accordance with the Goldman Originators’ origination procedures and underwriting criteria, except as described under “—The Originators—The Goldman Originators—Exceptions to Underwriting Criteria” below. GSMC attributes to itself all findings and conclusions resulting from the foregoing review procedures.

S-191

Repurchase Requests

GSMC most recently filed a Form ABS-15G on August 14, 2015. GSMC’s Central Index Key is 0001541502. With respect to the period from and including January 1, 2012 to and including June 30, 2015, GSMC does not have any activity to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to repurchase or replacement requests in connection with breaches of representations and warranties made by it as a sponsor of commercial mortgage securitizations.

Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC

General

Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company formed in April 2013 (“Rialto”), a Sponsor and an Originator, is wholly-owned by Rialto Capital Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that was formed in January 2009. The executive offices of Rialto are located at 600 Madison Avenue, 12th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

Goldman Sachs Bank USA, an affiliate of GSMC, provides warehouse financing to an affiliate of Rialto through a repurchase facility. Fifteen (15) of the Mortgage Loans that Rialto will transfer to the Depositor, with an aggregate principal balance of approximately $133,008,907 as of the Cut-off Date and representing approximately 13.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, are subject to that repurchase facility. Proceeds received by Rialto in connection with the contribution of Mortgage Loans to this securitization transaction will be applied, among other things, to reacquire the financed Mortgage Loans and make payments to Goldman Sachs Bank USA as the repurchase agreement counterparty.

Rialto’s Securitization Program

As a Sponsor, Rialto originates and acquires commercial real estate mortgage loans with a general focus on stabilized income-producing properties. All of the Mortgage Loans being sold to the Depositor by Rialto (the “Rialto Mortgage Loans”) were originated by Rialto. This is the twenty-first commercial real estate debt investment securitization to which Rialto is contributing commercial real estate debt investments. The commercial real estate debt investments originated and acquired by Rialto may include mortgage loans, mezzanine loans, B notes, participation interests, rake bonds, subordinate mortgage loans and preferred equity investments. Rialto securitized approximately $712 million and $1.49 billion of multifamily and commercial mortgage loans in public and private offerings during the calendar years 2013 and 2014, respectively.

Neither Rialto nor any of its affiliates will insure or guarantee distributions on the Certificates. The Certificateholders will have no rights or remedies against Rialto for any losses or other claims in connection with the Certificates or the Mortgage Loans except in respect of the repurchase and substitution obligations for material document defects or material breaches of representations and warranties made by Rialto in the applicable Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions” in this prospectus supplement.

Review of Rialto Mortgage Loans

Overview. Rialto has conducted a review of each of the Rialto Mortgage Loans. This review was performed by a team comprised of real estate and securitization professionals who are employees of Rialto or one or more of its affiliates (the “Rialto Review Team”). The review procedures described below were employed with respect to the Rialto Mortgage Loans. No sampling procedures were used in the review process. Rialto is the Sponsor with respect to eighteen (18) Mortgage Loans.

Set forth below is a discussion of certain current general guidelines of Rialto generally applicable with respect to Rialto’s underwriting analysis of multifamily and commercial real estate properties which serve as the direct or indirect source of repayment for commercial real estate debt originated by Rialto. All or a portion of the underwriting guidelines described below may not be applied exactly as described below at the time a particular asset is originated by Rialto.

Database. To prepare for securitization, members of the Rialto Review Team reviewed a database of loan-level and property-level information relating to the Rialto Mortgage Loans. The database was compiled from,

S-192

among other sources, the related Mortgage Loan documents, appraisals, environmental assessment reports, property condition reports, zoning reports, insurance review summaries, borrower-supplied information (including, but not limited to, rent rolls, leases, operating statements and budgets) and information collected by the Rialto Review Team during the underwriting process. Prior to securitization of the Rialto Mortgage Loans, the Rialto Review Team may have updated the information in the database with respect to the Rialto Mortgage Loans based on updates provided by the related servicer which may include information relating to loan payment status and escrows, updated operating statements, rent rolls and leasing activity, and information otherwise brought to the attention of the Rialto Review Team, to the extent such updates were provided to, and deemed material by, the Rialto Review Team. Such updates, if any, were not intended to be, and do not serve as, a re-underwriting of the Rialto Mortgage Loans.

A data tape (the “Rialto Data Tape”) containing detailed information regarding the Rialto Mortgage Loans was created from the information in the database referred to in the prior paragraph. The Rialto Data Tape was used to provide the numerical information regarding the Rialto Mortgage Loans in this prospectus supplement.

Data Comparison and Recalculation. Rialto engaged a third-party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures designed by Rialto, relating to information in this prospectus supplement regarding the Rialto Mortgage Loans. These procedures included:

· comparing the information in the Rialto Data Tape against various source documents provided by Rialto;

· comparing numerical information regarding the Rialto Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus supplement against the information contained in the Rialto Data Tape; and

· recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the Rialto Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus supplement.

Legal Review. Rialto engaged legal counsel to conduct certain legal reviews of the Rialto Mortgage Loans for disclosure in this prospectus supplement. In anticipation of the securitization described in this prospectus supplement, Rialto’s origination counsel reviewed a form of securitization representations and warranties at origination and, if applicable, identified exceptions to those representations and warranties. Rialto’s origination and underwriting staff also performed a review of the representations and warranties.

Legal counsel was also engaged in connection with this securitization transaction to assist in the review of the Rialto Mortgage Loans. Such assistance included, among other things, (i) a review of certain of Rialto’s asset summary reports, (ii) the review of the representation and warranties and exception reports referred to above relating to the Rialto Mortgage Loans prepared by origination counsel, (iii) the review of, and assistance in the completion by the Rialto Review Team of, a Due Diligence Questionnaire relating to the Rialto Mortgage Loans and (iv) the review of certain provisions in loan documents with respect to certain of the Rialto Mortgage Loans.

Other Review Procedures. The Rialto Review Team, with the assistance of counsel engaged in connection with this securitization transaction, also reviewed each Rialto Mortgage Loan to determine whether it materially deviated from the underwriting guidelines set forth under “—The Originators—Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC—Rialto’s Underwriting Standards and Loan Analysis” below.

Findings and Conclusions. Based on the foregoing review procedures, Rialto determined that the disclosure regarding the Rialto Mortgage Loans in this prospectus supplement is accurate in all material respects. Rialto also determined that the Rialto Mortgage Loans were not originated with any material exceptions from Rialto’s underwriting guidelines and procedures. Rialto attributes to itself all findings and conclusions resulting from the foregoing review procedures.

Review Procedures in the Event of a Mortgage Loan Substitution. Rialto will perform a review of any Rialto Mortgage Loan that it elects to substitute for a Rialto Mortgage Loan in the pool in connection with a Material Breach or a Material Document Defect. Rialto, and if appropriate its legal counsel, will review the Mortgage Loan documents and servicing history of the substitute mortgage loan to confirm it meets each of the criteria required under the terms of the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement and the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Qualification Criteria”). Rialto will engage a third party accounting firm to compare the Qualification Criteria against the underlying source documentation to verify the accuracy of the review by Rialto and to confirm any

S-193

numerical and/or statistical information to be disclosed in any required filings under the Exchange Act. Legal counsel will also be engaged by Rialto to render any tax opinion required in connection with the substitution.

Repurchase Requests

Rialto most recently filed a Form ABS-15G on February 6, 2015. Rialto’s Central Index Key number is 0001592182. With respect to the period from and including July 1, 2012 to and including June 30, 2015, Rialto does not have any activity to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act with respect to repurchase or replacement requests in connection with breaches of representations and warranties made by it as a sponsor of commercial mortgage securitizations.

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

General

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company formed on August 29, 2013 (“KGS”), a Sponsor and an Originator, is wholly-owned by KGS Holdings, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership that was formed on June 4, 2010. KGS originates commercial real estate mortgage loans for the purpose of securitizing them in CMBS transactions. The executive offices of KGS are located at 601 Lexington Avenue, 44th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

Citibank, N.A., the Certificate Administrator and an affiliate of the Depositor and of CGMRC, provides warehouse financing to an affiliate of KGS through a repurchase facility. All of the KGS Mortgage Loans, with an aggregate principal balance of approximately $32,105,560 as of the Cut-off Date and representing approximately 3.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, are subject to that repurchase facility. Proceeds received by KGS in connection with the sale of the KGS Mortgage Loans to the Depositor will be applied, among other things, to reacquire the financed KGS Mortgage Loans and make payments to Citibank, N.A., as the repurchase agreement counterparty.

KGS originates commercial real estate mortgage loans with a general focus on stabilized, income-producing properties. All of the KGS Mortgage Loans being sold to the Depositor by KGS were originated by KGS. This is the fifth commercial mortgage securitization to which KGS is contributing commercial mortgage loans as an originator and the third commercial mortgage securitization in which KGS is a sponsor. The Mortgage Loans originated by KGS for securitization are secured by commercial, multifamily or manufactured housing properties. Neither KGS nor its affiliates act as master servicer of the commercial mortgage loans it contributes to securitizations. KGS may, from time to time, provide other types of financing including, but not limited to, bridge loans, mezzanine loans or subordinate mortgage loans. As of the Cut-off Date, the total amount of commercial mortgage loans securitized by KGS is in excess of $86,852,500, and the total amount of such mortgage loans with respect to which KGS was a sponsor in the related securitization is approximately $21,250,000.

Neither KGS nor any of its affiliates will insure or guarantee distributions on the Certificates. The Certificateholders will have no rights or remedies against KGS for any losses or other claims in connection with the Certificates or the Mortgage Loans except in respect of the repurchase and substitution obligations for material document defects or material breaches of representations and warranties made by KGS in the applicable Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions” in this prospectus supplement.

Review of KGS Mortgage Loans

Overview. KGS has conducted a review of each of the KGS Mortgage Loans in connection with the securitization described in this prospectus supplement. This review of the KGS Mortgage Loans was performed by a team comprised of real estate and securitization professionals who are employees of KGS and/or its affiliates (the “KGS Review Team”). The review procedures described below were employed with respect to all of the KGS Mortgage Loans. No sampling procedures were used in the review process. KGS is the Sponsor with respect to five (5) Mortgage Loans, which are identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement.

Set forth below is a discussion of certain current general guidelines of KGS applicable with respect to KGS’s underwriting analysis of multifamily, manufactured housing and commercial real estate properties. All or a portion of the underwriting guidelines described below may not be applied exactly as described below at the time a particular asset is originated by KGS. See “—The Originators—KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC—Exceptions to Underwriting Criteria” in this prospectus supplement.

S-194

Database. To prepare for securitization, members of the KGS Review Team created and reviewed a database of loan-level and property-level information relating to the KGS Mortgage Loans. The database was compiled from, among other sources, the related Mortgage Loan documents, appraisals, environmental assessment reports, property condition reports, zoning reports, insurance review summaries, borrower-supplied information (including, but not limited to, rent rolls, leases, operating statements and budgets) and information collected by the KGS Review Team during the underwriting process. Prior to securitization of the KGS Mortgage Loans, the KGS Review Team may have updated the information in the database with respect to the KGS Mortgage Loans based on updates provided by the related servicer which may include information relating to loan payment status and escrows, updated operating statements, rent rolls and leasing activity, and information otherwise brought to the attention of the KGS Review Team, to the extent such updates were provided to, and deemed material by, the KGS Review Team. Such updates, if any, were not intended to be, and do not serve as, a re-underwriting of the KGS Mortgage Loans.

A data tape (the “KGS Data Tape”) containing detailed information regarding the KGS Mortgage Loans was created from the information in the database referred to in the prior paragraph. The KGS Data Tape was used to provide the numerical information regarding the KGS Mortgage Loans in this prospectus supplement.

Data Comparison and Recalculation. KGS engaged a third-party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures designed by KGS, relating to information in this prospectus supplement regarding the KGS Mortgage Loans. These procedures included:

· comparing the information in the KGS Data Tape against various source documents provided by KGS;

· comparing numerical information regarding the KGS Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus supplement against the information contained in the KGS Data Tape; and

· recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulas relating to the KGS Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus supplement.

Legal Review. KGS engaged legal counsel to conduct certain legal reviews of the KGS Mortgage Loans for disclosure in this prospectus supplement. In anticipation of the securitization described in this prospectus supplement, KGS’s origination counsel reviewed a form of securitization representations and warranties at origination and, if applicable, identified exceptions to those representations and warranties based on the review of the materials described in the following paragraph. Certain members of the KGS Review Team also performed a review of the representations and warranties.

Legal counsel was also engaged in connection with this securitization transaction to assist in the review of the KGS Mortgage Loans. Such assistance included, among other things (i) the review of the representations and warranties and any exceptions thereto relating to the KGS Mortgage Loans prepared by origination counsel, (ii) the review of, and assistance in the completion by the KGS Review Team of, a Due Diligence Questionnaire relating to the KGS Mortgage Loans and (iii) the review of certain provisions in the loan documents and post-closing summaries for certain KGS Mortgage Loans.

Other Review Procedures. The KGS Review Team, with the assistance of counsel engaged in connection with this securitization transaction, also generally reviewed each KGS Mortgage Loan to determine whether it materially deviated from the underwriting guidelines set forth under “—The Originators—KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC—Overview” below.

Findings and Conclusions. Based on the foregoing review procedures, KGS determined that the disclosure regarding the KGS Mortgage Loans in this prospectus supplement is accurate in all material respects. Except as described in “—The Originators—KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC—Exceptions to Underwriting Criteria” below, KGS has determined that the KGS Mortgage Loans were not originated with any material exceptions from KGS’s underwriting guidelines and procedures. KGS attributes to itself all findings and conclusions resulting from the foregoing review procedures.

Review Procedures in the Event of a Mortgage Loan Substitution. KGS will perform a review of any Mortgage Loan that it elects to substitute for a KGS Mortgage Loan in the pool in connection with a Material Breach or a Material Document Defect. KGS, and if appropriate its legal counsel, will review the Mortgage Loan documents

S-195

and servicing history of the substitute mortgage loan to confirm it meets each of the criteria required under the terms of the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement and the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Qualification Criteria”). KGS will engage a third party accounting firm to compare the Qualification Criteria against the underlying source documentation to verify the accuracy of the review by KGS and to confirm any numerical and/or statistical information to be disclosed in any required filings under the Exchange Act. Legal counsel will also be engaged by KGS to render any tax opinion required in connection with the substitution.

Repurchase Requests

KGS Holdings files reports on Form ABS-15G on behalf of KGS and filed an initial Form ABS-15G on June 9, 2015. KGS Holdings Central Index Key is 0001499542. KGS and KGS Holdings have no demand, repurchase or replacement history to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act.

Legal Proceedings

KGS is currently not subject to any material legal proceedings, the ultimate resolution of which would have a material adverse effect on its business or would be material to Certificateholders.

RAIT Funding, LLC

General

RAIT Funding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“RAIT”), is an operating subsidiary of RFT, a vertically integrated and internally managed real estate investment trust that originates and services commercial real estate loans, manages and advises on commercial real estate-related assets and acquires commercial real estate assets. RFT is headquartered at 2929 Arch Street, 17th Floor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, and also has offices in New York, New York, Charlotte, North Carolina and Chicago, Illinois.

Citibank, N.A., the Certificate Administrator and an affiliate of the Depositor and of CGMRC, provides warehouse financing to an affiliate of RAIT through a repurchase facility. Three (3) of the Mortgage Loans that RAIT will transfer to the Depositor, with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of approximately $27,838,749 as of the Cut-off Date and representing approximately 2.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, are subject to that repurchase facility. Proceeds received by RAIT in connection with the sale of the RAIT Mortgage Loans to the Depositor will be applied, among other things, to reacquire such financed RAIT Mortgage Loans and make payments to Citibank, N.A., as the repurchase agreement counterparty.

RAIT’s Securitization Program

RFT, through its operating subsidiaries, RAIT and RAIT Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“RAIT Partnership”), originates commercial mortgage loans, mezzanine loans, other loans and preferred equity interests that are collateralized by office buildings, retail shopping centers, multifamily apartment complexes and other properties located throughout the United States of America. RAIT’s commercial mortgage securitization program generally provides fixed rate mortgage loans having maturities between five and ten years. Additionally, RAIT Partnership provides bridge/transitional loans, mezzanine loans and preferred equity structures.

RAIT, RAIT Partnership and their affiliates directly or indirectly have contributed loans to fixed and floating rate commercial mortgage-backed securitization transactions. RAIT and its affiliates, acting as sponsor and mortgage loan seller, securitized approximately $60,831,868, $96,296,175, $539,944,126, $834,020,321 and $446,358,359 of multifamily and commercial mortgage loans in public and private offerings in calendar years 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, and the six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. Key members of the RAIT management team were officers at JP Morgan Chase and Wachovia Bank and have been involved in the commercial mortgage securitization business since 1997.

RAIT and its affiliates generally act either as originator, mortgage loan seller and/or sponsor in the commercial mortgage securitizations in which they participate. In such securitizations, there may be co-sponsors and/or other mortgage loan sellers or originators. In such securitizations, the mortgage loans originated by RAIT or one of its affiliates are generally sold to a depositor, which in turn transfers such loans to an issuing entity, which issues commercial mortgage pass-through certificates or similar securities that are in whole or part backed

S-196

by the cash flows from such mortgage loans. All of the Mortgage Loans to be sold by RAIT to the Depositor in connection with this securitization were originated by RAIT.

Neither RAIT nor any of its affiliates or subsidiaries will insure or guarantee distributions on the Certificates. The Certificateholders will have no rights or remedies against RAIT or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries for any losses or other claims in connection with the Certificates or the Mortgage Loans, except with respect to the repurchase and substitution obligations for material document defects or the material breaches of representations and warranties made by RAIT in the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions” in this prospectus supplement.

Review of RAIT Mortgage Loans

Overview. RAIT has conducted a review of the RAIT Mortgage Loans in connection with the securitization described in this prospectus supplement. The review of the RAIT Mortgage Loans was performed by a team comprised of real estate and securitization professionals who are employees of RFT or one or more of its affiliates (the “RAIT Securitization Team”). The review procedures described below were employed with respect to all of the RAIT Mortgage Loans. No sampling procedures were used in the review process.

Database. To prepare for securitization, members of the RAIT Securitization Team created a database of loan-level and property-level information relating to each RAIT Mortgage Loan. The database was compiled from, among other sources, the related RAIT Mortgage Loan documents, appraisals, environmental assessment reports, property condition reports, seismic studies, zoning reports, insurance review summaries, borrower-supplied information (including, but not limited to, rent rolls, leases, operating statements and budgets) and information collected by the RAIT Securitization Team during the underwriting process. After origination of each RAIT Mortgage Loan, the RAIT Securitization Team updated the information in the database with respect to such RAIT Mortgage Loan based on updates from RAIT Partnership’s servicing group, or, with respect to any RAIT Mortgage Loan being serviced by a third-party servicer, based on updates from such third-party servicer, regarding loan payment status and escrows, updated operating statements, rent rolls and leasing activity, and information otherwise brought to the attention of the RAIT Securitization Team.

A data tape containing detailed information regarding each RAIT Mortgage Loan (the “RAIT Data Tape”) was created from the information in the database referred to in the prior paragraph. The RAIT Data Tape was used to provide the numerical information regarding the RAIT Mortgage Loans in this prospectus supplement.

Data Comparison and Recalculation. RAIT engaged a third-party accounting firm to perform certain data comparison and recalculation procedures, the nature, extent and timing of which were designed by RAIT, relating to information in this prospectus supplement regarding the RAIT Mortgage Loans. These procedures included:

· comparing the information in the RAIT Data Tape against various source documents provided by RAIT that are described above under “—Database”;

· comparing numerical information regarding the RAIT Mortgage Loans and the related Mortgaged Properties disclosed in this prospectus supplement against the RAIT Data Tape; and

· recalculating certain percentages, ratios and other formulae relating to the RAIT Mortgage Loans disclosed in this prospectus supplement.

Legal Review. RAIT engaged various law firms to conduct certain legal reviews of the RAIT Mortgage Loans for disclosure in this prospectus supplement. In anticipation of the securitization of each RAIT Mortgage Loan, origination counsel reviewed a form of securitization representations and warranties at origination and, if applicable, identified exceptions to those representations and warranties. In addition, origination counsel for the RAIT Mortgage Loans completed due diligence questionnaires with respect to the RAIT Mortgage Loans. RFT’s underwriting staff and in-house legal team performed a similar review of representations and warranties, and completed due diligence questionnaires. Outside legal counsel was also engaged in connection with this securitization to assist in the review of the RAIT Mortgage Loans. Such assistance included, among other things, (i) a review of RAIT’s asset summary reports for each RAIT Mortgage Loan, (ii) a review of a compilation of the exception reports to the representations and warranties referred to above relating to the RAIT Mortgage Loans, and (iii) a review of a compilation of the due diligence questionnaires relating to the RAIT Mortgage Loans.

S-197

Other Review Procedures. With respect to any material pending litigation related to the RAIT Mortgage Loans and of which RFT was aware at the origination of any RAIT Mortgage Loan, RFT requested updates from the related borrower, origination counsel and/or borrower’s litigation counsel.

Findings and Conclusions. Based on the foregoing review procedures, RAIT determined that the disclosure regarding the RAIT Mortgage Loans in this prospectus supplement is accurate in all material respects. RAIT also determined that the RAIT Mortgage Loans were originated in accordance with RAIT’s origination procedures and underwriting criteria. RAIT attributes to itself all findings and conclusions resulting from the foregoing review procedures.

Repurchase Requests

RAIT files reports on Form ABS-15G, and most recently filed a Form ABS-15G on February 12, 2015. RAIT’s Central Index Key is 0001587045. RAIT Partnership, an affiliate of RAIT, files reports on Form ABS-15G, and most recently filed a Form ABS-15G on February 12, 2015. RAIT Partnership’s Central Index Key is 0001175134. With respect to the period from and including July 1, 2012 to and including June 30, 2015, RAIT and RAIT Partnership have no demand, repurchase or replacement history to report as required by Rule 15Ga-1 under the Exchange Act.

Compensation of the Sponsors

In connection with the offering and sale of the Certificates contemplated by this prospectus supplement, the Sponsors (including affiliates of the Sponsors) will be compensated for the sale of their respective Mortgage Loans in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of:

(a) the sum of any proceeds received from the sale of the Certificates to investors and the sale of servicing rights to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association for the master servicing of the Mortgage Loans and primary servicing of certain of the Serviced Loans, over

(b) the sum of the costs and expense of originating or acquiring the Mortgage Loans and the costs and expenses related to the issuance, offering and sale of the Certificates as described in this prospectus supplement.

The mortgage servicing rights were sold to the Master Servicer for a price based on the value of the Servicing Fee to be paid to the Master Servicer with respect to each Mortgage Loan and the value of the right to earn income on investments on amounts held by the Master Servicer with respect to the Mortgage Loans. The Master Servicer will also purchase the primary servicing rights for any Serviced Companion Loan.

The Depositor

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. is the depositor with respect to the Issuing Entity (in such capacity, the “Depositor”). The Depositor is a special purpose corporation incorporated in the State of Delaware on July 17, 2003 for the purpose of engaging in the business of, among other things, acquiring and depositing mortgage loans in trusts in exchange for certificates evidencing interest in such trusts and selling or otherwise distributing such certificates, in addition to other related activities. The principal executive offices of the Depositor are located at 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013. The telephone number is (212) 816-6000.

The Depositor does not have, nor is it expected in the future to have, any significant assets and is not engaged in activities unrelated to the securitization of mortgage loans. The Depositor will not have any business operations other than securitizing mortgage loans and related activities.

The Depositor is an affiliate of CGMRC, a Sponsor and an Originator, an affiliate of Citibank, N.A., the Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar and paying agent, and an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., one of the underwriters.

After establishing the Issuing Entity, the Depositor will have minimal ongoing duties with respect to the Certificates and the Mortgage Loans. The Depositor’s ongoing duties will include: (i) appointing a successor trustee or certificate administrator in the event of the removal of the Trustee or Certificate Administrator, (ii) paying any ongoing fees (such as surveillance fees) of the Rating Agencies, (iii) promptly delivering to the Trustee any document that comes into the Depositor’s possession that constitutes part of the Mortgage File or servicing file for

S-198

any Mortgage Loan, (iv) upon discovery of a breach of any of the representations and warranties of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Operating Advisor which materially and adversely affects the interests of the Certificateholders, giving prompt written notice of such breach to the affected parties, (v) providing information in its possession with respect to the Certificates to the Certificate Administrator to the extent necessary to perform REMIC tax administration, (vi) indemnifying the Issuing Entity, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Operating Advisor, the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer for any loss, liability or reasonable expense (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses) incurred by such parties arising from the Depositor’s willful misconduct, bad faith, fraud and/or negligence in the performance of its duties contained in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or by reason of negligent disregard of its obligations and duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (vii) signing any annual report on Form 10-K, including the required certification in Form 10-K under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and any distribution reports on Form 10-D and Current Reports on Form 8-K required to be filed by the Issuing Entity and (viii) mailing the notice of a succession of the Trustee or the Certificate Administrator to all Certificateholders.

On the Closing Date, the Depositor will acquire the Mortgage Loans from each Sponsor and will simultaneously transfer the Mortgage Loans, without recourse, to the Trustee for the benefit of the Certificateholders. See “Transaction Participants—The Depositor” in the prospectus.

The Originators

Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp., Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, GS Commercial Real Estate LP, Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC, KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC and RAIT Funding, LLC are referred to in this prospectus supplement as the “Originators”.

The information set forth in this prospectus supplement concerning the Originators and their underwriting standards has been provided by the Originators.

Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.

Overview. CGMRC’s commercial mortgage loans are primarily originated in accordance with the procedures and underwriting criteria described below. However, variations from the procedures and criteria described below may be implemented as a result of various conditions including each loan’s specific terms, the quality or location of the underlying real estate, the property’s tenancy profile, the background or financial strength of the borrower/sponsor or any other pertinent information deemed material by CGMRC. Therefore, this general description of CGMRC’s origination procedures and underwriting criteria is not intended as a representation that every commercial mortgage loan originated by it or on its behalf complies entirely with all criteria set forth below.

Process. The credit underwriting process for each CGMRC loan is performed by a deal team comprised of real estate professionals which typically includes an originator, an underwriter, a commercial closer and a third party due diligence provider operating under the review of CGMRC. This team conducts a thorough review of the related mortgaged property, which in most cases includes an examination of the following information, to the extent both applicable and available: historical operating statements, rent rolls, tenant leases, current and historical real estate tax information, insurance policies and/or schedules, and third party reports pertaining to

S-199

appraisal/valuation, zoning, environmental status and physical condition/seismic condition/engineering (see “—Escrow Requirements”, “—Title Insurance Policy”, “—Property Insurance”, “—Third Party Reports—Appraisal”, “—Third Party Reports—Environmental Report” and “—Third Party Reports—Property Condition Report” below). In some cases (such as a property having a limited operating history or having been recently acquired by its current owner), historical operating statements may not be available. Rent rolls would not be examined for certain property types, such as hospitality properties or single tenant properties, and tenant leases would not be examined for certain property types, such as hospitality, self storage, multifamily and manufactured housing community properties.

A member of the CGMRC deal team or one of its agents performs an inspection of the property as well as a review of the surrounding market environment, including demand generators and competing properties (if any), in order to confirm tenancy information, assess the physical quality of the collateral, determine visibility and access characteristics, and evaluate the property’s competitiveness within its market.

The CGMRC deal team or one of its agents also performs a detailed review of the financial status, credit history, credit references and background of the borrower and certain key principals using financial statements, income tax returns, credit reports, criminal/background investigations, and specific searches for judgments, liens, bankruptcy and pending litigation. Circumstances may also warrant an examination of the financial strength and credit of key tenants as well as other factors that may impact the tenants’ ongoing occupancy or ability to pay rent.

After the compilation and review of all documentation and other relevant considerations, the deal team finalizes its detailed underwriting analysis of the property’s cash flow in accordance with CGMRC’s property-specific, cash flow underwriting guidelines. Determinations are also made regarding the implementation of appropriate loan terms to structure around risks, resulting in features such as ongoing escrows or up-front reserves, letters of credit, lockboxes/cash management agreements or guarantees. A complete credit committee package is prepared to summarize all of the above referenced information.

Credit Approval. All commercial mortgage loans must be presented to one or more credit committees that include senior real estate professionals among others. After a review of the credit committee package and a discussion of the loan, the committee may approve the loan as recommended or request additional due diligence, modify the terms, or reject the loan entirely.

Debt Service Coverage and LTV Requirements. CGMRC’s underwriting standards generally require a minimum debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) of 1.20x and a maximum loan-to-value ratio (LTV) of 80%. However these thresholds are guidelines and exceptions are permitted under the guidelines on the merits of each individual loan, such as reserves, letters of credit and/or guarantees and CGMRC’s assessment of the property’s future prospects. Property and loan information is not updated for securitization unless CGMRC determines that information in its possession has become stale.

Certain properties may also be encumbered by subordinate debt secured by such property and/or mezzanine debt secured by direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower and when such mezzanine or subordinate debt is taken into account, may result in aggregate debt that does not conform to the aforementioned DSCR and LTV parameters.

Amortization Requirements. While CGMRC’s underwriting guidelines generally permit a maximum amortization period of 30 years, certain loans may provide for interest-only payments through maturity or for a portion of the loan term. If the loan entails only a partial interest-only period, the monthly debt service, annual debt service and DSCR set forth in this prospectus supplement and Annex A to this prospectus supplement reflect a calculation on the future (larger) amortizing loan payment. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool” in this prospectus supplement.

Escrow Requirements. CGMRC may require borrowers to fund escrows for taxes, insurance, capital expenditures and replacement reserves. In addition, CGMRC may identify certain risks that warrant additional escrows or holdbacks for items to be released to the borrower upon the satisfaction of certain conditions. Such escrows or holdbacks may cover tenant improvements/leasing commissions, deferred maintenance, environmental remediation or unfunded obligations, among other things. Springing escrows may also be structured for identified risks such as specific rollover exposure, to be triggered upon the non-renewal of one or more key tenants. In some cases, the borrower may be allowed to post a letter of credit or guaranty in lieu of a

S-200

cash reserve, or provide periodic evidence of timely payment of a typical escrow item. Escrows are evaluated on a case-by-case basis and are not required for all CGMRC commercial mortgage loans.

Generally, CGMRC requires escrows as follows:

· Taxes—An initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property taxes (based on the most recent property assessment and the current millage rate) are typically required to satisfy all taxes and assessments, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if there is an institutional sponsor or the sponsor is a high net worth individual or (ii) if and to the extent that a single or major tenant (which may be a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property is required to pay taxes directly.

· Insurance—An initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property insurance premium are typically required to pay all insurance premiums, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the related borrower maintains a blanket insurance policy, (ii) if and to the extent that a single or major tenant (which may be a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property is obligated to maintain the insurance or is permitted to self-insure, or (iii) if and to the extent that another third party unrelated to the borrower (such as a condominium board, if applicable) is obligated to maintain the insurance.

· Replacement Reserves—Replacement reserves are generally calculated in accordance with the expected useful life of the components of the mortgaged property during the term of the mortgage loan. Annual replacement reserves are generally underwritten to the suggested replacement reserve amount from an independent, third-party property condition or engineering report, or to certain minimum requirements depending on the property type, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, if and to the extent that a single or major tenant (which may be a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property is responsible for all repairs and maintenance, including those required with respect to the roof and structure of the improvements.

· Tenant Improvement / Leasing Commissions—In the case of retail, office and industrial properties, a tenant improvement / leasing commission reserve may be required to be funded either at loan origination and/or during the term of the mortgage loan to cover anticipated leasing commissions or tenant improvement costs that might be associated with re-leasing certain space involving major tenants, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the tenant’s lease extends beyond the loan term or (ii) if the rent for the space in question is considered below market.

· Deferred Maintenance—A deferred maintenance reserve may be required to be funded at loan origination in an amount equal to 125% of the estimated cost of material immediate repairs or replacements identified in the property condition report, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee to complete the immediate repairs in a specified amount of time, (ii) if the deferred maintenance amount does not materially impact the related mortgaged property’s function, performance or value or (iii) if a single or major tenant (which may be a ground tenant) at the related mortgaged property is responsible for the repairs.

· Environmental Remediation—An environmental remediation reserve may be required to be funded at loan origination in an amount equal to 100% to 125% of the estimated remediation cost identified in the environmental report, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee wherein it agrees to take responsibility and pay for the identified environmental issues, (ii) if environmental insurance is obtained or already in place or (iii) if a third party unrelated to the borrower is identified as the responsible party.

For a description of the escrows collected with respect to the CGMRC Mortgage Loans, please see Annex A to this prospectus supplement.

S-201

Title Insurance Policy. The borrower is required to provide, and CGMRC or its counsel typically will review, a title insurance policy for each property. The provisions of the title insurance policy are required to comply with the Sponsor representation and warranty set forth in paragraph (6) on Annex E-1 to this prospectus supplement without any exception that CGMRC deems material.

Property Insurance. CGMRC requires the borrower to provide, or authorizes the borrower to rely on a tenant or other third party to obtain, insurance policies meeting the requirements set forth in the Sponsor representations and warranties in paragraphs (16) and (29) on Annex E-1 to this prospectus supplement without any exceptions that CGMRC deems material (other than with respect to deductibles and allowing a tenant to self-insure).

Third Party Reports. In addition to or as part of applicable origination guidelines or reviews described above, in the course of originating the CGMRC Mortgage Loans, CGMRC generally considered the results of third party reports as described below. In many instances, however, one or more provisions of the guidelines were waived or modified in light of the circumstances of the relevant loan or property.

· Appraisal. CGMRC obtains an appraisal meeting the requirements described in the Sponsor representation and warranty set forth in paragraph (41) on Annex E-1 to this prospectus supplement. In addition, the appraisal (or a separate letter) includes a statement by the appraiser that the guidelines in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, were followed in preparing the appraisal.

· Environmental Report. CGMRC generally obtains a Phase I site assessment or an update of a previously obtained site assessment for each mortgaged property prepared by an environmental firm approved by CGMRC. CGMRC or its designated agent typically reviews the Phase I site assessment to verify the presence or absence of potential adverse environmental conditions. In cases in which the Phase I site assessment identifies any such conditions, CGMRC generally requires that the condition be addressed in a manner that complies with the Sponsor representation and warranty set forth in paragraph (40) on Annex E-1 to this prospectus supplement without any exception that CGMRC deems material.

· Property Condition Report. CGMRC generally obtains a current property condition report (a “PCR”) for each mortgaged property prepared by a structural engineering firm approved by CGMRC. CGMRC or an agent typically reviews the PCR to determine the physical condition of the property and to determine the anticipated costs of necessary repair, replacement and major maintenance or capital expenditure over the term of the mortgage loan. In cases in which the PCR identifies an immediate need for material repairs or replacements with an anticipated cost that is over a certain minimum threshold or percentage of loan balance, CGMRC often requires that funds be put in escrow at the time of origination of the mortgage loan to complete such repairs or replacements or obtains a guarantee from a sponsor of the borrower in lieu of reserves. See “—Escrow Requirements” above.

Servicing. Interim servicing for all CGMRC loans prior to securitization is typically performed by a nationally recognized rated third party interim servicer. In addition, primary servicing is occasionally retained by certain qualified mortgage brokerage firms under established sub-servicing agreements with CGMRC, which firms may continue primary servicing certain loans following the securitization closing date. Otherwise, servicing responsibilities are transferred from the interim servicer to the master servicer of the securitization trust (and a primary servicer when applicable) at closing of the securitization. From time to time, the interim servicer may retain primary servicing.

Exceptions to Underwriting Criteria. Except as disclosed in the following paragraphs, none of the CGMRC Mortgage Loans have exceptions to the related underwriting criteria.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio, representing approximately 2.7% of the Initial Pool Balance, the DSCR of 1.14x falls below the minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.20x generally required by CGMRC’s underwriting standards. However, the Mortgaged Properties are each single-tenant retail properties occupied by Wal-Mart pursuant to long-term leases that are not scheduled to expire until January 2035, with respect to the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as

S-202

Dale Avenue Roanoke and Plantation Road Walmart, and March 2035, with respect to the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Walmart Orange Avenue. Based on the foregoing factors and CGMRC’s evaluation of the quality of the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties, CGMRC approved the inclusion of the Mortgage Loan in this securitization transaction.

With respect to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as 210 Bedford Avenue, representing approximately 0.4% of the Initial Pool Balance, the debt service coverage ratio of 1.15x falls below the minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.20x generally required by CGMRC’s underwriting standards. However, the Mortgage Loan has a Cut-off Date LTV Ratio of 55.1% which amortizes down to an LTV Ratio at Maturity of 50.6%, and the land was appraised at $5,000,000, which is 133.3% of the Mortgage Loan’s original principal amount. Based on the foregoing factors and CGMRC’s evaluation of the quality of the Mortgaged Property, CGMRC approved the inclusion of the Mortgage Loan in this securitization transaction.

The Goldman Originators

Overview. GSMC and GS CRE, each an Originator, are affiliated with each other and with Goldman, Sachs & Co., one of the underwriters. GSMC and GS CRE are referred to as the “Goldman Originators” in this prospectus supplement.

The primary business of each Goldman Originator is the underwriting and origination, either by itself or together with another originator, of mortgage loans secured by commercial or multifamily properties. The commercial mortgage loans originated by each Goldman Originator include both fixed and floating rate commercial mortgage loans and such commercial mortgage loans are often included in both public and private securitizations. Many of the commercial mortgage loans originated by GS CRE are acquired by GSMC and sold to securitizations in which GSMC acts as sponsor and/or loan seller.

Fixed Rate Commercial Mortgage Loans⁽¹⁾

Year	Total Goldman Originator Fixed Rate Loans Originated (approximate)	Total Goldman Originator Fixed Rate Loans Securitized (approximate)
2014	$2.9 billion	$3.1 billion
2013	$5.0 billion	$5.3 billion
2012	$5.6 billion	$4.6 billion
2011	$2.3 billion	$2.2 billion
2010	$1.6 billion	$1.1 billion
2009	$400 million	$400 million

Floating Rate Commercial Mortgage Loans⁽¹⁾

Year	Total Goldman Originator Floating Rate Loans Originated (approximate)	Total Goldman Originator Floating Rate Loans Securitized (approximate)
2014	$3.2 billion	$2.0 billion
2013	$777 million	$1.3 billion
2012	$1.9 billion	$0
2011	$140 million	$0
2010	$0	$0
2009	$40 million	$0

⁽¹⁾ Represents origination for all Goldman Originators and affiliates of Goldman Originators originating commercial mortgage loans.

Origination and Underwriting Process. Each Goldman Originator’s commercial mortgage loans are primarily originated in accordance with the origination procedures and underwriting criteria described below. However, variations from these procedures and criteria may occur as a result of various conditions including each loan’s specific terms, the quality or location of the underlying real estate, the property’s tenancy profile, the background or financial strength of the borrower/sponsor, or any other pertinent information deemed material by the applicable Goldman Originator. Therefore, this general description of the Goldman Originators’ origination procedures and underwriting criteria is not intended as a representation that every commercial mortgage loan originated by it complies entirely with all procedures and criteria set forth below. For important information about the circumstances that have affected the underwriting of a GSMC Mortgage Loan in the mortgage pool, see “—Exceptions to Underwriting Criteria” below and “Exceptions to Sponsor Representations and Warranties” in Annex E-2 to this prospectus supplement.

S-203

The underwriting process for each mortgage loan originated by a Goldman Originator is performed by an origination team comprised of real estate professionals which typically includes an originator, analyst, loan officer and commercial closer. This team conducts a review of the related mortgaged property, which typically includes an examination of historical operating statements (if available), rent rolls, certain tenant leases, current and historical real estate tax information, insurance policies and/or schedules, and third-party reports pertaining to appraisal/valuation, zoning, environmental status and physical condition/seismic/engineering. In certain cases, the Goldman Originator may engage an independent third party due diligence provider, pursuant to a program of specified procedures, to assist in the underwriting and preparation of analyses required by such procedures, subject to the oversight and ultimate review and approval by the Goldman Originator origination team.

A member of the applicable Goldman Originator origination team performs or engages a third party to perform an inspection of the property in order to assess the physical quality of the collateral, confirm tenancy, and determine visibility and accessibility of the property as well as proximity to major thoroughfares, transportation centers, employment sources, retail areas, educational facilities and recreational areas. Such site inspections are also generally used to assess the submarket in which the property is located and to evaluate the property’s competitiveness within its market.

The applicable Goldman Originator origination team also performs a review of the financial status, credit history and background of the borrower and certain key principals of the borrower. Among the items generally reviewed are financial statements, independent credit reports, criminal/background investigations, and specific searches in select jurisdictions for judgments, liens, bankruptcy and pending litigation.

After the compilation and review of all documentation and other relevant considerations, the origination team finalizes its underwriting analysis of the property’s cash flow in accordance with the property specific cash flow underwriting guidelines of the applicable Goldman Originator. Determinations are also made regarding the implementation of appropriate loan terms to structure around risks, resulting in features such as ongoing escrows or up front reserves, letters of credit, lockboxes/cash management agreements or guarantees. A complete credit committee package is prepared to summarize all of the above referenced information.

All commercial mortgage loans must be presented to one or more credit committees which consist of senior real estate professionals, among others. After a review of the credit committee package and a discussion of the loan, the committee may approve the loan as recommended or request additional due diligence, modify the terms, or reject the loan entirely.

Each Goldman Originator’s underwriting guidelines generally require that a mortgage loan have, at origination, a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.20x and maximum loan-to-value ratio of 80%. However these thresholds are guidelines and exceptions may be made on the merits of each individual loan taking into account such factors as reserves, letters of credit and/or guarantees, the applicable Goldman Originator’s judgment of the property and/or market performance in the future.

Certain properties may also be encumbered by, or otherwise support payments on, subordinate debt and/or mezzanine debt secured by direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower. It is possible that a Goldman Originator or an affiliate will be a lender on that additional debt, and may either sell such debt to an unaffiliated third party or hold it in inventory. When such additional debt is taken into account, the aggregate debt may not conform to the aforementioned debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value ratio parameters.

Each Goldman Originator may require borrowers to fund various escrows for taxes, insurance, capital expenses and replacement reserves. In addition, each Goldman Originator may identify certain risks that warrant additional escrows or holdbacks for items such as leasing-related matters, deferred maintenance, environmental remediation or unfunded obligations, which escrows or holdbacks would be released upon satisfaction of the applicable conditions. Springing escrows may also be structured for identified risks such as specific rollover exposure, to be triggered upon the non-renewal of one or more key tenants. In some cases, the borrower may be allowed to post a letter of credit or guaranty in lieu of a cash reserve, or provide periodic evidence of timely payment of a typical escrow item. Escrows are evaluated on a case-by-case basis and are not required for all commercial mortgage loans originated by the Goldman Originators.

S-204

Generally, the required escrows for GSMC Mortgage Loans are as follows:

· Taxes—An initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property taxes (based on the most recent property assessment and the current millage rate) are typically required to satisfy all taxes and assessments, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if there is an institutional or high net-worth individual property sponsor or (ii) if the related mortgaged property is a single tenant property in which the related tenant is required to pay taxes directly.

· Insurance—An initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property insurance premium are typically required to pay all insurance premiums, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the related borrower maintains a blanket insurance policy or (ii) if the related mortgaged property is a single tenant property and the related tenant is required to obtain insurance directly or self-insures.

· Replacement Reserves—Replacement reserves are generally calculated in accordance with the expected useful life of the components of the property during the term of the mortgage loan. Annual replacement reserves are generally underwritten to the suggested replacement reserve amount from an independent, third-party property condition or engineering report, or to certain minimum requirements by property type, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, if the related mortgaged property is a single tenant property and the related tenant is responsible for all repairs and maintenance, including those required with respect to the roof and improvement structure.

· Tenant Improvement / Leasing Commissions—Tenant improvement / leasing commission reserves may be required to be funded either at loan origination and/or during the related mortgage loan term to cover certain anticipated leasing commissions or tenant improvement costs which might be associated with re-leasing the space, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the related mortgaged property is a single tenant property and the related tenant’s lease extends beyond the loan term or (ii) where rent at the related mortgaged property is considered below market.

· Deferred Maintenance—A deferred maintenance reserve may be required to be funded at loan origination in an amount equal to 100% to 125% of the estimated cost of material immediate repairs or replacements identified in the property condition or engineering report, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee to complete the immediate repairs in a specified amount of time, (ii) the deferred maintenance amount does not materially impact the function, performance or value of the property or (iii) if the related mortgaged property is a single tenant property the tenant is responsible for the repairs.

· Environmental Remediation—An environmental remediation reserve may be required at loan origination in an amount equal to 100% to 125% of the estimated remediation cost identified in the environmental report, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee agreeing to take responsibility and pay for the identified environmental issues or (ii) environmental insurance is obtained or already in place.

For a description of the escrows collected with respect to the GSMC Mortgage Loans, please see Annex A to this prospectus supplement.

Each Goldman Originator and its origination counsel will generally examine whether the use and occupancy of the property is in material compliance with zoning, land-use, building rules, regulations and orders then applicable to that property. Evidence of this compliance may be in the form of one or more of the following: legal opinions, surveys, recorded documents, temporary or permanent certificates of occupancy, letters from government officials or agencies, title insurance endorsements, engineering or consulting reports, zoning reports and/or representations by the related borrower. In some cases, a mortgaged property may constitute a legal non-conforming use or structure. In such cases, each Goldman Originator may require an endorsement to the title

S-205

insurance policy and/or the acquisition of law and ordinance coverage in the casualty insurance policy with respect to the particular non-conformity unless it determines that: (i) the non-conformity should not have a material adverse effect on the ability of the borrower to rebuild; or (ii) if the improvements are rebuilt in accordance with currently applicable law, the value and performance of the property would be acceptable; or (iii) any major casualty that would prevent rebuilding has a sufficiently remote likelihood of occurring; or (iv) a cash reserve, a letter of credit or an agreement imposing recourse liability from a principal of the borrower is provided to cover losses.

The borrower is required to provide, and each Goldman Originator or its origination counsel typically will review, a title insurance policy for each property. The title insurance policies provided typically must meet the following requirements: (i) written by a title insurer licensed to do business in the jurisdiction where the mortgaged property is located, (ii) in an amount at least equal to the original principal balance of the mortgage loan, (iii) protection and benefits run to the mortgagee and its successors and assigns, (iv) written on an American Land Title Association form or equivalent policy promulgated in the jurisdiction where the mortgaged property is located and (v) if a survey was prepared, the legal description of the mortgaged property in the title policy conforms to that shown on the survey.

Except in certain instances where credit rated tenants are required to obtain insurance or may self-insure, each Goldman Originator typically requires that the related mortgaged property be insured by a hazard insurance policy with a customary deductible and in an amount at least equal to the lesser (x) of the outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan and (y) 100% of the full insurable replacement cost of the improvements located on the property. If applicable, the policy contains appropriate endorsements to avoid the application of coinsurance and does not permit reduction in insurance proceeds for depreciation, except that the policy may permit a deduction for depreciation in connection with a cash settlement after a casualty if the insurance proceeds are not being applied to rebuild or repair the damaged improvements.

Flood insurance, if available, must be in effect for any mortgaged property that at the time of origination included material improvements in any area identified in the Federal Register by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as a special flood hazard area. The flood insurance policy must meet the requirements of the then-current guidelines of the Federal Insurance Administration, be provided by a generally acceptable insurance carrier and be in an amount representing coverage not less than the least of: (i) the outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan, (ii) the full insurable value of the property and (iii) the maximum amount of insurance available under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, except in some cases where self-insurance is permitted.

The standard form of hazard insurance policy typically covers physical damage or destruction of the improvements on the mortgaged property caused by fire, lightning, explosion, smoke, windstorm and hail, riot or strike and civil commotion. The policies may contain some conditions and exclusions to coverage, including exclusions related to acts of terrorism. Generally, each of the mortgage loans requires that the related property have coverage for terrorism or terrorist acts, if such coverage is available at commercially reasonable rates. In some cases, there is a cap on the amount that the related borrower will be required to expend on terrorism insurance.

Each mortgage typically also requires the borrower to maintain comprehensive general liability insurance against claims for personal and bodily injury, death or property damage occurring on, in or about the property in an amount customarily required by institutional lenders.

Each mortgage typically further requires the related borrower to maintain business interruption or rent loss insurance in an amount not less than 100% of the projected rental income from the related property for not less than twelve months.

Although properties are typically not insured for earthquake risk, a borrower will be required to obtain earthquake insurance if the seismic report indicates that the PML or SEL is greater than 20%.

In the course of originating their respective Mortgage Loans, the Goldman Originators generally considered the results of third party reports as described below:

· Appraisal—Each Goldman Originator obtains an appraisal or an update of an existing appraisal for each mortgaged property prepared by an appraisal firm approved in accordance with the applicable

S-206

Goldman Originator’s internal documented appraisal policy. Each Goldman Originator origination team and a third party consultant engaged by the Goldman Originator typically reviews the appraisal. All appraisals are conducted by an independent appraiser that is state certified, an appraiser belonging to the Appraisal Institute, a member association of professional real estate appraisers, or an otherwise qualified appraiser. All appraisals are conducted in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices. In addition, the appraisal report (or a separate letter) includes a statement by the appraiser that the guidelines in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, were followed in preparing the appraisal.

· Environmental Report—Each Goldman Originator obtains a Phase I site assessment or an update of a previously obtained site assessment for each mortgaged property prepared by an environmental firm approved by the applicable Goldman Originator. In certain cases, the borrower may have obtained the Phase I site assessment, and the assessment is then re-addressed to the Goldman Originator. Each Goldman Originator origination team and a third party environmental consultant engaged by the Goldman Originator or the borrower typically reviews the Phase I site assessment to verify the presence or absence of potential adverse environmental conditions. Furthermore, an environmental assessment conducted at any particular real property collateral will not necessarily cover all potential environmental issues. For example, an analysis for radon, lead-based paint, mold and lead in drinking water will usually be conducted only at multifamily rental properties and only when the Goldman Originator or the environmental consultant believes that such an analysis is warranted under the circumstances. In cases in which the Phase I site assessment identifies any potential adverse environmental conditions and no third party is identified as responsible for such condition, or the condition has not otherwise been satisfactorily mitigated, the Goldman Originator generally requires additional environmental testing, such as a Phase II environmental assessment on the related mortgaged property, an environmental insurance policy, the borrower to conduct remediation activities or to establish an operations and maintenance plan, or to place funds in escrow to be used to address any required remediation.

· Physical Condition Report—Each Goldman Originator obtains a physical condition report (“PCR”) or an update of a previously obtained PCR for each mortgaged property prepared by a structural engineering firm approved by the applicable Goldman Originator to assess the structure, exterior walls, roofing, interior structure and/or mechanical and electrical systems. In certain cases, the borrower may have obtained the PCR, and the PCR is then re-addressed to the Goldman Originator. Each Goldman Originator and a third party structural consultant engaged by the Goldman Originator or the borrower typically reviews the PCR to determine the physical condition of the property, and to determine the anticipated costs of necessary repair, replacement and major maintenance or capital expenditure over the term of the mortgage loan. In cases in which the PCR identifies an immediate need for material repairs or replacements with an anticipated cost that is over a certain minimum threshold or percentage of loan balance, the Goldman Originator generally requires that funds be put in escrow at the time of origination of the mortgage loan to complete such repairs or replacements or obtains a guarantee from a sponsor of the borrower in lieu of reserves.

· Seismic—Each Goldman Originator generally obtains a seismic report or an update of a previously obtained seismic report for all mortgaged properties located in seismic zone 3 or 4 to assess probable maximum loss (“PML”) or scenario expected loss (“SEL”) for the related mortgaged property. In certain cases, the borrower may have obtained the seismic report and the seismic report is then re-addressed to the Goldman Originator.

Exceptions to Underwriting Criteria. None of the GSMC Mortgage Loans have exceptions to the related underwriting criteria.

Servicing. Interim servicing for some of the loans originated by a Goldman Originator prior to securitization is typically performed by an interim servicer that is unaffiliated with the Goldman Originators. Additionally, primary servicing may occasionally be retained by certain qualified mortgage brokerage firms under established sub-servicing agreements with the applicable Goldman Originator, which may be retained post-securitization including the applicable fees. Otherwise, servicing responsibilities are transferred from the unaffiliated interim servicer to the master servicer of the securitization trust (and a primary servicer when applicable) at closing of the securitization.

S-207

Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC

Rialto’s Underwriting Standards and Loan Analysis

Overview. Rialto is the Sponsor with respect to eighteen (18) Mortgage Loans. Rialto or an affiliate originated each of the Rialto Mortgage Loans being deposited into the securitization described in this prospectus supplement. Generally, Rialto performed an underwriting analysis with respect to each Mortgage Loan applicant and the related Mortgaged Property.

Set forth below is a discussion of certain current general guidelines of Rialto generally applicable with respect to Rialto’s underwriting analysis of multifamily and commercial real estate properties which serve as the direct or indirect source of repayment for commercial real estate debt originated by Rialto. All or a portion of the underwriting guidelines described below may not be applied exactly as described below at the time a particular asset is originated by Rialto.

Process and Loan Analysis. The underwriting process for each Rialto Mortgage Loan is performed by a transaction team comprised of real estate professionals that typically includes a loan originator and an underwriter subject to oversight by the members of the management team of Rialto. This team conducts a review of the related real property, which typically includes an examination of some or all of the following information, among other things, to the extent applicable and available: historical operating statements, rent rolls, certain tenant leases, real estate tax information, insurance policies and/or schedules and third party reports pertaining to appraisal, physical condition and environmental status. Each applicable report is reviewed for acceptability by Rialto or a third-party reviewer. The results of these reviews are incorporated into Rialto’s underwriting analysis. In some cases, certain of these documents may not be required or may not be reviewed due to the nature of the related real property. For instance, historical operating statements may not be available with respect to real property with limited operating history or that has been recently acquired by its current owner. In addition, rent rolls would not be examined for certain property types (e.g., hospitality properties), and executed tenant leases would not be examined for certain property types (e.g., hospitality, self-storage, multifamily and manufactured housing community properties) although the forms of leases would typically be reviewed for certain of these property types.

Rialto also performs an underwriting analysis with respect to the borrower under each asset it originates. The underwriting analysis of the borrower may include a review of third-party credit reports and reports resulting from judgment, lien or bankruptcy searches. Borrowers are generally required to be single purpose entities (although exceptions may be made from time to time on a case-by-case basis) and, in some cases, other structural requirements may be imposed on the borrower which are intended to reduce the likelihood of the borrower becoming involved in a bankruptcy proceeding; however, there can be no assurance that any of these structural requirements will prevent a particular borrower from becoming involved in a bankruptcy proceeding.

After the compilation and review of all applicable documentation and other relevant considerations, the transaction team finalizes its detailed underwriting analysis of the real property’s cash flow in a manner generally consistent with Rialto’s underwriting guidelines. Determinations are also made regarding the implementation of appropriate transaction terms to address certain risks, which may result in the recommendation of certain additional structural features. A credit committee memorandum is prepared which summarizes the above referenced information and which is circulated to the credit committee for review.

Credit Approval. All assets originated by Rialto must be approved by one or more specified internal committees. After a review of the credit committee package and a discussion of the asset, a committee may approve a transaction as recommended, request additional due diligence, modify the transaction terms or decline a transaction entirely.

Debt Service Coverage Ratio. In connection with the origination of an asset, Rialto will analyze whether cash flow expected to be derived from the related real property will be sufficient to make the required payments under that transaction over its expected term, taking into account, among other things, revenues and expenses for, and other debt currently secured directly or indirectly by, or that in the future may be secured directly or indirectly by, the related real property. The debt service coverage ratio is an important measure of the likelihood of default on a particular asset. In general, the debt service coverage ratio at any given time is the ratio of—

· the amount of income, net of expenses and required reserves, derived or expected to be derived from the related real property for a given period, to

S-208

· the scheduled payments of principal and interest during that given period on the subject asset and any other loans that are secured by liens of senior or equal priority on, or otherwise have a senior or equal entitlement to be repaid from the income generated by, the related real property.

However, the amount described in the first bullet of the preceding sentence is often a highly subjective number based on a variety of assumptions regarding, and adjustments to, revenues and expenses with respect to the related real property. Accordingly, based on such subjective assumptions and analysis, there can be no assurance that the underwriting analysis of any particular asset will conform to the foregoing in every respect or to any similar analysis which may be performed by other persons or entities. For example, when calculating the debt service coverage ratio for a particular asset, Rialto may utilize net cash flow that was calculated based on assumptions regarding projected rental income, expenses and/or occupancy. There is no assurance that such assumptions made with respect to any asset or the related real property will, in fact, be consistent with actual property performance.

Generally, the debt service coverage ratio for assets originated by Rialto, calculated as described above, will be subject to a minimum standard at origination (generally equal to or greater than 1.20x); however, exceptions may be made when consideration is given to circumstances particular to the asset, the related real property, the associated loan-to-value ratio (as described below), reserves or other factors. For example, Rialto may originate an asset with a debt service coverage ratio below the minimum standard at origination based on, among other things, the amortization features of the overall debt structure, the type of tenants and leases at the related real property, the taking of additional collateral such as reserves, letters of credit and/or guarantees, the profile of the borrower and its owners, Rialto’s judgment of improved property and/or market performance in the future and/or other relevant factors.

Loan-to-Value Ratio. Rialto also looks at the loan-to-value ratio of a prospective investment related to multifamily or commercial real estate as one of the factors it takes into consideration in evaluating the likelihood of recovery if a property is liquidated following a default. In general, the loan-to-value ratio of an asset related to multifamily or commercial real estate at any given time is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of:

· the then outstanding principal balance of the asset and any other loans that are secured (directly or indirectly) by liens of senior or equal priority on the related real property, to

· the estimated value of the related real property based on an appraisal, a cash flow analysis, a recent sales price or another method or benchmark of valuation.

Generally, the loan-to-value ratio for assets originated by Rialto, calculated as described above, will be subject to a maximum standard at origination (generally less than or equal to 80%); however, exceptions may be made when consideration is given to circumstances particular to the asset, the related real property, debt service coverage, reserves or other factors. For example, Rialto may originate a multifamily or commercial real estate loan with a loan-to-value ratio above the maximum standard at origination based on, among other things, the amortization features of the overall debt structure, the type of tenants and leases at the related real property, the taking of additional collateral such as reserves, letters of credit and/or guarantees, the profile of the borrower and its owners, Rialto’s judgment of improved property and/or market performance in the future and/or other relevant factors.

Additional Debt. When underwriting an asset, Rialto will take into account whether the related real property and/or direct or indirect interest in a related borrower are encumbered by additional debt and will analyze the likely effect of that additional debt on repayment of the subject asset. It is possible that Rialto or an affiliate will be the lender on that additional debt, and may either sell such debt to an unaffiliated third party or hold it for investment or future sale.

The debt service coverage ratios at origination described above under “—Debt Service Coverage Ratio” and the loan-to-value ratios at origination described above under “—Loan-to-Value Ratio” may be significantly below the minimum standard and/or significantly above the maximum standard, respectively, when calculated taking into account the existence of additional debt secured directly or indirectly by equity interests in the related borrower.

Assessments of Property Condition. As part of the origination and underwriting process, Rialto will analyze the condition of the real property for a prospective asset. To aid in that analysis, Rialto may, subject to certain exceptions, inspect or retain a third party to inspect the property which, depending on the property type, such

S-209

inspections generally include an evaluation of one or more of the following: functionality, design, attractiveness, visibility and accessibility of the property as well as proximity to major thoroughfares, transportation centers, employment sources, retail areas, educational facilities and recreational areas and generally assess the submarket in which the property is located, which may include evaluating competitive or comparable properties and will in most cases obtain the property reports described below.

Appraisal Report. Rialto will in most cases obtain an appraisal or an update of an existing appraisal from an independent appraiser that is state certified, belonging to the Appraisal Institute, a membership association of professional real estate appraisers, or an otherwise qualified appraiser. The appraisal reports are conducted in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices and the appraisal report (or a separate letter accompanying the report) will include a statement by the appraiser that the guidelines in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, were followed in preparing the appraisal report.

Environmental Report. Rialto requires that an environmental consultant prepare a Phase I environmental report or that an update of a prior environmental report, a transaction screen or a desktop review is prepared with respect to the real property related to the asset. Alternatively, Rialto may forego an environmental report in limited circumstances, such as when it has obtained the benefits of an environmental insurance policy or an environmental guarantee. Depending on the findings of the initial environmental report, Rialto may require additional record searches or environmental testing, such as a Phase II environmental report with respect to the subject real property. In certain cases where an environmental report discloses the existence of, or potential for, adverse environmental conditions, including as a result of the activities of identified tenants, adjacent property owners or previous owners of the subject real property, the related borrower may be required to establish operations and maintenance plans, monitor the real property, abate or remediate the condition and/or provide additional security such as letters of credit, reserves or environmental insurance policies.

Engineering Report. Rialto generally requires that an engineering firm inspect the real property related to the asset to assess and prepare a report regarding the structure, exterior walls, roofing, interior structure, mechanical systems and/or electrical systems. In some cases, engineering reports are based on, and limited to, information available through visual inspection. Rialto will consider the engineering report in connection with determining whether to address any recommended repairs, corrections or replacements in connection with origination and whether any identified deferred maintenance should be addressed in connection with origination. In some cases, Rialto uses conclusions in the engineering reports in connection with making a determination about the necessity for escrows related to repairs and the continued maintenance of the real property.

Seismic Report. If the real property related to an asset consists of improvements located in seismic zones 3 or 4, Rialto generally requires a seismic report from an engineering firm to establish the probable maximum or bounded loss for the improvements at the property as a result of an earthquake. Generally, if a seismic report concludes that the related real property is estimated to have a probable maximum loss or scenario expected loss in excess of 20%, Rialto may require retrofitting of the improvements or that the borrower obtain earthquake insurance if available at a commercially reasonable price.

Zoning and Building Code Compliance. In connection with the origination of an asset related to multifamily or commercial real estate, Rialto will generally obtain one or more of the following to consider whether the use and occupancy of the related real property is in material compliance with zoning, land use, building rules, regulations and orders then applicable to that property: zoning reports, legal opinions, surveys, recorded documents, temporary or permanent certificates of occupancy, letters from government officials or agencies, title insurance endorsements, engineering or consulting reports and/or representations by the related borrower. In cases where the real property constitutes a legal nonconforming use or structure, Rialto may require an endorsement to the title insurance policy and/or the acquisition of law and ordinance insurance with respect to the particular non-conformity unless it determines that: (i) the non-conformity should not have a material adverse effect on the ability of the borrower to rebuild, (ii) the real property, if permitted to be repaired or restored in conformity with current law, would in Rialto’s judgment constitute adequate security, (iii) any major casualty that would prevent rebuilding has a sufficiently remote likelihood of occurring, (iv) a variance or other similar change in applicable zoning restrictions is potentially available, or the applicable governing entity is unlikely to enforce the related limitations, (v) casualty insurance proceeds together with the value of any additional collateral are expected to be available in an amount estimated by Rialto to be sufficient to pay off all relevant indebtedness in full, and/or (vi) a cash reserve, a letter of credit or an agreement imposing recourse liability from a principal of the borrower is provided to cover losses.

S-210

Escrow Requirements. Based on its analysis of the related real property, the borrower and the principals of the borrower, Rialto may require a borrower to fund various escrows for taxes, insurance, capital expenses, replacement reserves, re-tenanting reserves, environmental remediation and/or other matters. Rialto conducts a case-by-case analysis to determine the need for a particular escrow or reserve. Consequently, the underlying documents for some assets do not contain provisions requiring the establishment of escrows and reserves, or only require the establishment of escrows and reserves in limited amounts and/or circumstances. Furthermore, where escrows or reserves are required, Rialto may accept an alternative to a cash escrow or reserve from a borrower, such as a letter of credit or a guarantee from the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower or periodic evidence that the items for which the escrow or reserve would have been established are being paid or addressed. In some cases, Rialto may determine that establishing an escrow or reserve is not warranted given the amounts that would be involved and Rialto’s evaluation of the ability of the real property, the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the subject expense or cost absent creation of an escrow or reserve.

Notwithstanding the foregoing discussion, Rialto may originate or acquire, and may have originated or acquired, real estate related loans and other investments that vary from, or do not comply with, Rialto’s underwriting guidelines as described in this prospectus supplement and/or such underwriting guidelines may not have been in place or may have been in place in a modified version at the time Rialto or its affiliates originated or acquired certain assets. In addition, in some cases, Rialto may not have strictly applied these underwriting guidelines as the result of a case-by-case permitted exception based upon other compensating factors.

Servicing

Interim servicing for Rialto Mortgage Loans prior to securitization is performed by a nationally recognized rated third party interim servicer. In addition, primary servicing is occasionally retained by certain qualified mortgage brokerage firms under established sub-servicing agreements with Rialto, which firms may continue primary servicing certain loans following the securitization closing date. Otherwise, servicing responsibilities are transferred from the interim servicer to the master servicer of the securitization trust (and a primary servicer when applicable) on the securitization Closing Date. From time to time, the interim servicer may retain primary servicing.

Exceptions to Underwriting Criteria

Rialto’s Mortgage Loans were not originated with any exceptions to Rialto’s underwriting criteria described above.

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Overview. KGS is the Sponsor with respect to the KGS Mortgage Loans. KGS originated each of the KGS Mortgage Loans being deposited into the securitization described in this prospectus supplement. Generally, KGS performed an underwriting analysis with respect to each KGS Mortgage Loan applicant and the related Mortgaged Property.

Notwithstanding the discussion below, given the unique nature of commercial, multifamily and manufactured housing properties, the underwriting procedures and the credit analysis with respect to any particular commercial mortgage loan may significantly differ from one asset to another and will be driven by circumstances particular to that property including, among others, the property type, current use, size, location, market conditions, reserve requirements, additional collateral, tenant quality and lease terms, borrower identity, sponsorship, performance history and/or other factors. Therefore, this general description of KGS’s underwriting criteria is not intended as a representation that every commercial mortgage loan originated by KGS complies entirely with all procedures and criteria set forth below. For a description of any material exceptions to the underwriting guidelines in this prospectus supplement, see “—Exceptions to Underwriting Criteria” below.

If a mortgage loan exhibits one or more variances from the general underwriting procedures described below, such variances may be considered acceptable under certain circumstances, including but not limited to the following circumstances: (i) if the property achieves a low loan-to-value ratio; (ii) if the property achieves a high debt service coverage ratio; (iii) the quality of the property location; (iv) certain favorable market characteristics; (v) experienced sponsor(s)/guarantor(s) with financial wherewithal; (vi) additional springing reserves; (vii) cash flow sweeps; or (viii) elements of recourse included in the mortgage loan. For a description of any material

S-211

exceptions to the underwriting guidelines in this prospectus supplement, see “—Exceptions to Underwriting Criteria” below.

Loan Analysis. Generally, both a credit analysis and a collateral analysis is conducted with respect to each mortgage loan. The credit analysis of the borrower generally includes a review of third-party credit reports, certifications provided by the borrower with respect to prior real estate experience and current contingent liabilities and/or judgment, lien, bankruptcy and pending litigation searches. The collateral analysis generally includes a review of the historical property operating statements, rent rolls and certain significant tenant leases, in each case to the extent available and applicable. The credit underwriting also generally includes a review of third party appraisals, as well as environmental reports, engineering assessments, zoning reports and seismic reports, if applicable and obtained. Generally, a site inspection is completed by a member of the KGS team to assess the tenancy of the property and to ascertain the overall quality, functionality and competitiveness of the property, including its neighborhood and market, accessibility and visibility. The submarket in which the property is located is assessed to evaluate competitive or comparable properties as well as market trends. Unless otherwise specified in this prospectus supplement, all financial, occupancy and other information contained in this prospectus supplement is based on such information and we cannot assure you that such financial, occupancy and other information remains accurate.

Loan Approval. All mortgage loans originated by KGS require approval by a loan credit committee, which includes senior risk management executives of KGS. The committee may approve a mortgage loan as recommended, request additional due diligence prior to approval, approve it subject to modifications of the loan terms, or decline a mortgage loan transaction.

Debt Service Coverage Ratio and Loan-to-Value Ratio. Generally, the debt service coverage ratio for mortgage loans originated by KGS that is calculated based on values determined at the origination of the mortgage loan will be equal to or greater than 1.20x and the loan-to-value ratio for mortgage loans originated by KGS that is calculated based on values determined at the origination of the mortgage loan will be equal to or less than 80%. Notwithstanding the foregoing, exceptions may be made when consideration is given to circumstances particular to the mortgage loan, the related property, reserves or other factors. For example, KGS may originate a mortgage loan with a debt service coverage ratio below 1.20x or a loan-to-value ratio greater than 80% based on, among other factors, the location of the property, the amortization features of the mortgage loan (for example, if the mortgage loan provides for relatively rapid amortization), the type of tenants and leases at the property, the posting of additional collateral such as reserves, letters of credit and/or guarantees, KGS’s judgment of acceptable property and/or market performance, and/or other relevant factors. Additionally, mortgage loans originated by KGS may have a lower debt service coverage ratio and a higher loan-to-value ratio if any permitted subordinate or mezzanine debt is taken into account.

Additional Debt and Amortization. Certain mortgage loans originated by KGS may include, or may permit in the future, (i) subordinate debt secured by the related property and/or (ii) mezzanine debt secured by direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower, and/or (iii) additional unsecured subordinate debt. It is possible that KGS or an affiliate of KGS may be the lender on any such additional debt. Also, certain mortgage loans may provide for payments of interest only, with no principal paydowns or amortization prior to maturity, or for an interest only period during a portion of the mortgage loan term.

Assessments of Property Condition. As part of the underwriting process, the property assessments and reports described below are typically obtained:

Appraisals. Independent appraisals or an update of an independent appraisal is required in connection with the origination of each mortgage loan. KGS requires that the appraiser comply with and abide by Title XI of the Financial Institution Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The appraisal is based on the current use of the mortgaged property and must include an estimate of the then-current market value of the property “as-is” in its then-current condition, although in certain cases, KGS may also obtain a value on an “as-stabilized” basis reflecting leases that have been executed but for which the related tenants have not yet commenced paying rent. KGS calculates the loan-to-value ratio based on the values set forth in the appraisal.

Environmental Assessment. Phase I environmental assessments that conform to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E 1527-13 entitled, “Standard Practices for Environmental Site Assessment: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process”, as may be amended from time to time, are

S-212

performed on all properties. However, when circumstances warrant, an update of a prior environmental assessment, a transaction screen or a desktop review may be utilized. Nevertheless, an environmental assessment conducted at any particular real property collateral will not necessarily cover all potential environmental issues. In cases in which the assessment or update conditions that would require clean-up, remedial action or another response, KGS may require any of the following: additional environmental testing, such as a Phase II environmental assessment with respect to the subject real property collateral; that the borrower deposit reserves or post a letter of credit in an amount sufficient to complete any required remediation; an environmental or pollution liability insurance policy; remedial or other action from the borrower (including the establishment of any operations and maintenance plans recommended by the assessment); and/or a guaranty from the sponsor of the borrower.

Property Condition Assessments. Inspections or updates of previously conducted inspections are conducted by independent licensed engineers, architects or other consultants for all properties in connection with the origination of a mortgage loan. The exterior walls, roofing, interior construction, mechanical and electrical systems and general condition of the site, buildings and other improvements located at a property are inspected. The resulting reports on some of the properties may indicate a variety of deferred maintenance items and recommended capital expenditures. In some instances, repairs or maintenance are required to be completed before closing or within a certain period of time after origination (generally not more than 12 months from the origination date) and/or cash reserves are established to fund the deferred maintenance or replacement items.

Seismic Report. Generally, a seismic report is required for all properties located in seismic zones 3 or 4.

Zoning and Building Code Compliance. With respect to each mortgage loan, KGS will generally consider whether the use and occupancy of the related real property collateral is in material compliance with zoning, land-use, building rules, regulations and orders then applicable to such property. Evidence of this compliance may be in the form of one or more of the following: zoning reports; surveys; recorded documents; temporary or permanent certificates of occupancy; letters from government officials or agencies; title insurance endorsements; engineering or consulting reports; legal opinions; and/or representations by the related borrower.In some cases, a mortgaged property may constitute a legal non-conforming use or structure. In such cases, KGS may require an endorsement to the title insurance policy and/or the acquisition of law and ordinance coverage in the casualty insurance policy with respect to the particular non-conformity unless it determines that: (i) the non-conformity should not have a material adverse effect on the ability of the borrower to rebuild; or (ii) the real property, if permitted to be repaired or restored in conformity with current law, would in KGS’s judgment constitute adequate security; (iii) casualty insurance proceeds together with the value of any additional collateral are expected to be available in an amount estimated by KGS to be sufficient to pay off all relevant indebtedness in full, and/or (iv) a cash reserve, a letter of credit or an agreement imposing recourse liability from the sponsor of the borrower is provided to cover losses.

Escrow Requirements. KGS typically requires most borrowers to fund various escrows for taxes and insurance, immediate repairs, replacement reserves and, if applicable, tenant improvements and leasing commissions. Depending on the details of the loan transaction and the results of underwriting and due diligence review, additional reserves may be required. The following is a brief description of the reserves typically required by KGS:

· Taxes—typically, an initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property taxes (based on the most recent property assessment and the current millage rate) are required to provide KGS with sufficient funds to satisfy all taxes and assessments, except (i) where there is an institutional sponsor or high net worth individual sponsor, (ii) if the tenant at a single tenant property or an investment grade or creditworthy tenant is required to pay taxes directly or (iii) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio or the mortgaged property meets a certain threshold debt service coverage ratio.

· Insurance—if the property is insured under an individual policy (i.e., the property is not covered by a blanket policy), typically an initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property insurance premium are required to provide KGS with sufficient funds to pay all insurance premiums, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the related borrower maintains a blanket insurance policy, (ii) if the tenant at a single tenant property or an investment grade or creditworthy tenant is responsible for paying insurance premiums or self-insuring or (iii) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio or the mortgaged property meets a certain threshold debt service coverage ratio.

S-213

· Replacement Reserves—replacement reserves are generally calculated in accordance with the expected useful life of the components of the property during the term of the mortgage loan, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to (i) if the tenant at a single tenant property or an investment grade or creditworthy tenant is responsible for all repairs and maintenance or if a third party such as a franchisor, management company or association is collecting reserves for such purpose or (ii) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio or the mortgaged property meets a certain threshold debt service coverage ratio.

· Immediate Repairs / Environmental Remediation—typically, an immediate repair or remediation reserve is required where an environmental or engineering report suggests that such reserve is necessary. Upon funding of the applicable mortgage loan, KGS generally requires that at least 110% of the estimated costs of repairs be reserved and generally requires that repairs be completed within a year after the funding of the applicable mortgage loan, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the sponsor of the borrower delivers a guarantee with respect to such matter, (ii) if the estimated cost of such repair or remediation does not materially impact the property’s function, performance or value, (iii) if the related mortgaged property is a single tenant property for which the tenant is responsible for such repair or remediation or (iv) in the case of environmental remediation, insurance is obtained or already in place.

· Tenant Improvement / Leasing Commissions—in most cases, various tenants have lease expirations within the loan term. To mitigate this risk, special reserves may be required to be funded either at closing of the mortgage loan and/or during the related loan term to cover certain anticipated leasing commissions or tenant improvement costs which might be associated with re-leasing the space occupied by such tenants, except that such escrows are not required in certain circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) if the related mortgaged property is a single tenant property (or is substantially leased to a single tenant) and the related tenant’s lease extends beyond the loan term, (ii) where rent at the related mortgaged property is considered below market or (iii) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio or the mortgaged property meets a certain threshold debt service coverage ratio.

Furthermore, KGS may accept an alternative to a cash escrow or reserve from a borrower, such as a letter of credit or a guarantee from the borrower or the sponsor of the borrower or periodic evidence that the items for which the escrow or reserve would have been established are being paid or addressed. In some cases, KGS may determine that establishing an escrow or reserve is not warranted given the amounts that would be involved and KGS’s evaluation of the cash flow generated by the property and/or the ability of the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to bear the subject expense or cost absent creation of an escrow or reserve. Occasionally, KGS will implement a cap on the total dollar amount that shall be collected into a reserve account. In certain cases, KGS has structured springing reserves for certain identified risks. This practice is utilized based upon KGS’s evaluation of the cash flow generated by the property and/or the ability of the borrower or a holder of direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrower to fund expenses at the property.

Title Insurance Policy. The borrower is required to provide, and KGS’s origination counsel will review, a title insurance policy for each property. The title insurance policies provided typically must meet the following requirements: (i) the title insurance policy is written by a title insurer licensed to do business in the jurisdiction where the mortgaged property is located, (ii) the title insurance policy is in an amount at least equal to the original principal balance of the mortgage loan, (iii) the title insurance policy’s protection and benefits run to the mortgagee and its successors and assigns, (iv) the title insurance policy is written on an American Land Title Association form or equivalent policy promulgated in the jurisdiction where the mortgaged property is located (to the extent available), and (v) if a survey was prepared, the legal description of the mortgaged property in the title policy conforms to that shown on the survey.

Property Insurance. KGS typically requires the borrower to provide one or more of the following insurance policies: (i) commercial general liability insurance for bodily injury or death and property damage; (ii) an “All Risk of Physical Loss” policy; (iii) if applicable, boiler and machinery coverage; and (iv) if the mortgaged property is located in a special flood hazard area where mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements apply, flood insurance. In some cases, a tenant is responsible for maintaining insurance and, subject to the satisfaction of rating conditions or net worth criteria, such tenant is permitted to self-insure against the risks.

Servicing. Interim servicing for all loans originated by KGS prior to securitization is typically performed by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. However, there are circumstances when KGS uses a servicer other

S-214

than Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. Generally, servicing responsibilities are transferred from the interim servicer to the master servicer of the securitization trust at the closing of the securitization. From time to time, the interim servicer may retain primary servicing.

Exceptions to Underwriting Criteria. None of KGS’s Mortgage Loans were originated with any exceptions to KGS’s underwriting criteria described above.

RAIT Funding, LLC

Overview. RAIT originates commercial mortgage loans from its headquarters in Philadelphia. All mortgage loans must be approved by RFT’s management investment committee, as described under “—Loan Approval” below. Set forth below is a discussion of certain general underwriting guidelines with respect to mortgage loans originated by RAIT (or in certain cases, an affiliate) for securitization.

Notwithstanding the discussion below, given the unique nature of commercial properties, the underwriting and origination procedures and the credit analysis with respect to any particular commercial mortgage loan may significantly differ from one asset to another and will be driven by circumstances particular to that loan and related property, including, among others, the property type, current use, size, location, market conditions, reserve requirements, additional collateral, tenant quality and lease terms, borrower identity, sponsorship, performance history and/or other factors. If a mortgage loan exhibits any one or more of the following characteristics, variances from general underwriting/origination procedures described below may, in some instances, be considered acceptable under the circumstances indicated: (i) low loan-to-value ratio; (ii) high debt service coverage ratio; (iii) experienced sponsor(s)/guarantor(s) with financial wherewithal; (iv) additional springing reserves; (v) cash flow sweeps; and (vi) elements of recourse included in the mortgage loan. Therefore, this general description of RAIT’s origination procedures and underwriting criteria is not intended as a representation that every commercial mortgage loan originated by it complies entirely with all procedures and criteria set forth below. For important information about the circumstances that have affected the underwriting of Mortgage Loans in the mortgage pool originated by RAIT or such affiliate, see the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus supplement, the other subsections of this “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors” section and “Annex E-2—Exceptions to Sponsor Representations and Warranties” in this prospectus supplement.

Loan Analysis. Generally, RAIT performs both a credit analysis and collateral analysis with respect to a loan applicant and the real estate that will secure a mortgage loan. In general, the analysis of a borrower includes a review of anti-money laundering or OFAC checks, as well as background checks, and the analysis of its loan sponsor includes a review of money laundering and background checks, third-party credit reports, bankruptcy and lien searches, general banking references and commercial mortgage related references. In general, the analysis of the collateral includes a site visit and a review of the property’s historical operating statements (if available), independent market research, an appraisal with an emphasis on rental and sales comparables, engineering and environmental reports, the property’s historic and current occupancy, financial strengths of tenants, the duration and terms of tenant leases and the use of the property. Each report is reviewed for acceptability by a real estate finance loan underwriter. The borrower’s and property manager’s experience and presence in the subject market are also reviewed. Consideration is also given to anticipated changes in cash flow that may result from changes in lease terms or market considerations. Other factors that are considered in the origination of a commercial mortgage loan include current operations, occupancy and tenant base.

Borrowers are generally required to be single-purpose entities although they are generally not required to be structured to limit the possibility of becoming insolvent or bankrupt unless the loan has a principal balance of greater than $20 million, in which case additional limitations including the requirement that the borrower have at least one independent director are required.

Loan Approval. All mortgage loans originated by RAIT or such affiliate must be approved by a management investment committee of RFT. The credit committee may approve a mortgage loan as recommended, request additional due diligence, modify the loan terms or decline a loan transaction.

Debt Service Coverage Ratio and Loan-to-Value Ratio. RAIT’s underwriting standards generally mandate minimum debt service coverage ratios and maximum loan-to-value ratios. A loan-to-value ratio is generally based upon the appraiser’s determination of value. The debt service coverage ratio is based upon the underwritten net cash flow and is given particular importance. However, notwithstanding such guidelines, in certain circumstances

S-215

the actual debt service coverage ratios, loan-to-value ratios and amortization periods for the mortgage loans originated by RAIT or such affiliate may vary from these guidelines.

In addition, with respect to certain mortgage loans originated by RAIT or such affiliate, there may exist subordinate debt secured by the related property and/or mezzanine debt secured by direct or indirect ownership interests in the related borrower. Such mortgage loans may have a lower debt service coverage ratio and/or a higher loan-to-value ratio if such subordinate and/or mezzanine debt is taken into account.

Escrow Requirements. Generally, RAIT requires most borrowers to fund various escrows for taxes and insurance, capital expenses and replacement reserves. Generally, the required escrows for mortgage loans originated by RAIT or such affiliate are as follows:

· Taxes—Typically an initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property taxes (based on the most recent property assessment and the current millage rate) are required to provide the lender with sufficient funds to satisfy all taxes and assessments. RAIT may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances including, but not limited to, where a tenant is required to pay the taxes directly.

· Insurance—If the property is insured under an individual policy (i.e., the property is not covered by a blanket policy), typically an initial deposit and monthly escrow deposits equal to 1/12th of the annual property insurance premium are required to provide the lender with sufficient funds to pay all insurance premiums. The originator may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, where a property is covered by a blanket insurance policy maintained by the borrower or sponsor, or where a tenant is required to insure the property (which tenant insurance may include self-insurance by the tenant).

· Replacement Reserves—Replacement reserves are generally calculated in accordance with the expected useful life of the components of the property during the term of the mortgage loan plus two years. The originator relies on information provided by an independent engineer to make this determination. The originator may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, where a tenant is responsible for replacements under the terms of its lease.

· Completion Repair/Environmental Remediation—Typically, a completion repair or remediation reserve is required where an environmental or engineering report suggests that such reserve is necessary. Upon funding of the applicable mortgage loan, the originator generally requires that at least 110% to 125% of the estimated costs of repairs or replacements be reserved and generally requires that repairs or replacements be completed within a year after the funding of the applicable mortgage loan. The originator may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) where an investment grade party has agreed to take responsibility, and pay, for any required repair or remediation or (ii) the amount recommended is de minimis.

· Tenant Improvement/Lease Commissions—In most cases, various tenants have lease expirations within the mortgage loan term. To mitigate this risk, special reserves may be required to be funded either at closing of the mortgage loan and/or during the mortgage loan term to cover certain anticipated leasing commissions or tenant improvement costs which might be associated with re-leasing the space occupied by such tenants. The originator may waive this escrow requirement under appropriate circumstances, including, but not limited to, (i) where rents at the mortgaged property are considered to be sufficiently below market, (ii) where no material leases expire within the mortgage loan term, or the lease roll is not concentrated or (iii) where there is a low loan-to-value ratio (i.e., 65% or less).

Servicing. Except as stated below, interim servicing for all loans originated by RAIT or such affiliate prior to securitization is typically performed by RAIT Partnership. RFT, the parent company of RAIT Partnership, is rated on Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services Select Servicer List as a U.S. Commercial Mortgage Primary and Special Servicer and is also a rated Commercial Mortgage Primary and Special Servicer by Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC. Interim servicing for certain loans originated by RAIT and its affiliates is generally performed by Grandbridge Real Estate Capital LLC or NorthMarq Capital, LLC.

S-216

Generally, servicing responsibilities are transferred from the interim servicer to the master servicer of the securitization trust at the closing of the securitization. From time to time, the interim servicer may retain primary servicing after closing of the securitization.

Exceptions to Underwriting Criteria. The RAIT Mortgage Loans were originated in accordance with the underwriting guidelines set forth above. None of the RAIT Mortgage Loans were originated with any exceptions to the related underwriting criteria.

The Issuing Entity

The Issuing Entity, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33, is a New York common law trust that will be formed on the Closing Date pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The only activities that the Issuing Entity may perform are those set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which are generally limited to owning and administering the Mortgage Loans and any REO Property, disposing of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Property, issuing the Certificates, making distributions, providing reports to certificateholders and other activities described in this prospectus supplement. Accordingly, the Issuing Entity may not issue securities other than the Certificates, or invest in securities, other than investing of funds in the Collection Account and other accounts maintained under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in certain short-term high-quality investments. The Issuing Entity may not lend or borrow money, except that the Master Servicer and the Trustee may make advances of delinquent monthly debt service payments to the Issuing Entity, and the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Trustee may make servicing advances, to the Issuing Entity, but in each case only to the extent it deems such advances to be recoverable from the related Mortgage Loan; such advances are intended to provide liquidity, rather than credit support. The Pooling and Servicing Agreement may be amended as set forth under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Amendment” in this prospectus supplement. The Issuing Entity administers the Mortgage Loans through the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Operating Advisor, except that any Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan is being serviced and administered pursuant to the Outside Servicing Agreement. A discussion of the duties of the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Operating Advisor, including any discretionary activities performed by each of them, is set forth under “—The Trustee,” “—The Certificate Administrator,” “—Servicers—The Master Servicer,” “—Servicers—The Special Servicer,” “—Servicers—The Outside Servicers and the Outside Special Servicers,” “—The Operating Advisor,” “Description of the Offered Certificates” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement” in this prospectus supplement.

The only assets of the Issuing Entity other than the Mortgage Loans and any REO Properties (and, with respect to a Loan Combination, solely the Issuing Entity’s interest in any REO property acquired with respect to such Loan Combination pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or the Outside Servicing Agreement, as applicable) are the Distribution Account and other accounts maintained pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the short-term investments in which funds in the Distribution Account and other accounts are invested. The Issuing Entity has no present liabilities, but has potential liability relating to ownership of the Mortgage Loans and any REO Properties (and, with respect to a Loan Combination, solely the Issuing Entity’s interest in any REO property acquired with respect to such Loan Combination pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or the Outside Servicing Agreement, as applicable), and the other activities described in this prospectus supplement, and indemnity obligations to the Depositor, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Operating Advisor and various related persons. The fiscal year of the Issuing Entity is the calendar year. The Issuing Entity has no executive officers or board of directors and acts through the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer.

The Depositor is contributing the Mortgage Loans to the Issuing Entity. The Depositor is purchasing the Mortgage Loans from the Sponsors, as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Sale of Mortgage Loans; Mortgage File Delivery” and “—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions” in this prospectus supplement.

Since the Issuing Entity is a common law trust, it may not be eligible for relief under the federal bankruptcy laws, unless it can be characterized as a “business trust” for purposes of the federal bankruptcy laws. Bankruptcy courts look at various considerations in making this determination, so it is not possible to predict with any certainty whether or not the trust would be characterized as a “business trust”.

S-217

The Trustee

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (“DBTCA”) will act as trustee (in such capacity, the “Trustee”) and custodian (in such capacity, the “Custodian”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

DBTCA is a New York banking corporation with its offices located at 1761 East St. Andrew Place, Santa Ana, California 92705-4934, Attention: Trust Administration—CGCMT 2015-GC33, and its telephone number is (714) 247-6000.

DBTCA and its affiliates have provided corporate trust services since 1991. DBTCA and its affiliates have previously been appointed to the role of trustee for over 1,900 mortgage-backed transactions and have significant experience in this area.

DBTCA will also act as custodian of the mortgage files pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. DBTCA and its affiliates have performed this custodial role in numerous mortgage-backed transactions since 1991. DBTCA will maintain the mortgage files in secure, fire-resistant facilities. DBTCA will not physically segregate the mortgage files from other mortgage files in DBTCA’s custody but will keep them in shared facilities. However, DBTCA’s proprietary document tracking system will show the location within DBTCA’s facilities of each mortgage file and will show that the Mortgage Loan documents are held on behalf of the Issuing Entity.

In its capacity as trustee on commercial mortgage securitizations, DBTCA is generally required to make an advance if the related master servicer or special servicer fails to make a required advance. In the past three years, DBTCA, in its capacity as trustee, has not been required to make an advance on a domestic commercial mortgage-backed securities transaction.

DBTCA has been named as a defendant in civil litigation concerning its role as trustee of certain residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts. On June 18, 2014, a group of investors (“Plaintiff Investors”) filed a civil action against DBTCA and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”) in New York State Supreme Court purportedly on behalf of and for the benefit of 544 private-label RMBS trusts asserting claims for alleged violations of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence based on DBTCA’s and DBNTC’s alleged failure to perform their obligations as trustees for the trusts (the “NY Derivative Action”). An amended complaint was filed on July 16, 2014, adding Plaintiff Investors and RMBS trusts to the NY Derivative Action. On November 24, 2014, the Plaintiff Investors moved to voluntarily dismiss the NY Derivative Action without prejudice. Also on November 24, 2014, substantially the same group of Plaintiff Investors filed a civil action against DBTCA and DBNTC in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “SDNY Action”), making substantially the same allegations as the New York Derivative Action with respect to 564 RMBS trusts (542 of which were at issue in the NY Derivative Action). The SDNY Action is styled both as a derivative action on behalf of the named RMBS trusts and, in the alternative, as a putative class action on behalf of holders of RMBS representing interests in those RMBS trusts. DBTCA is vigorously defending the SDNY Action. DBTCA has no pending legal proceedings (including, based on DBTCA’s present evaluation, the litigation disclosed in this paragraph) that would materially affect its ability to perform its duties as Trustee on behalf of the Certificateholders.

The foregoing information concerning the Trustee has been provided by DBTCA. None of the Depositor, the underwriters, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator, the Sponsors or any of their affiliates takes any responsibility for this information or makes any representation or warranty as to its accuracy or completeness.

The Trustee is required to maintain a rating on its unsecured long term debt of at least (A) “A” by Fitch Ratings, Inc., and (B) “A1” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (or “A2” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. if the Trustee has a short term debt rating of at least “P-1” from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.; provided, however, that solely with respect to DBTCA as the initial Trustee, for so long as the Master Servicer maintains a rating on its unsecured long term debt of at least “A2” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and a short term debt rating of at least “P-1” from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., the initial Trustee will be deemed to have met these eligibility requirements if it maintains a rating on its unsecured long term debt of at least “Baa2” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and a short term debt rating of at least “P-2” from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.) (or such other rating with respect to which the Rating Agencies have provided a Rating Agency Confirmation). In addition, the Trustee is required to satisfy the requirements for a trustee contemplated by clause (a)(4)(i) of Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act.

S-218

The Trustee may resign at any time by giving written notice to, among others, the other parties to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. However, no such resignation will be effective until a successor has been appointed. Upon such notice, the Master Servicer will appoint a successor Trustee. If no successor Trustee has been appointed and accepted such appointment within one month after the giving of such notice of resignation, the resigning Trustee may petition the court for appointment of a successor Trustee.

The Depositor may remove the Trustee (and appoint a successor Trustee) if, among other things, the Trustee ceases to be eligible to continue as such under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or if at any time the Trustee becomes incapable of acting, or is adjudged bankrupt or insolvent, or a receiver of the Trustee or its property is appointed or any public officer takes charge or control of the Trustee or of its property. The holders of Certificates evidencing more than 50% of the aggregate Voting Rights allocated to all of the Certificates may remove the Trustee (and appoint a successor Trustee) upon written notice to, among others, the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Certificate Administrator and the Trustee.

Any resignation or removal of the Trustee and appointment of a successor Trustee will not become effective until acceptance by the successor Trustee of the appointment.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon any resignation or termination of the Trustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Trustee will continue to be entitled to receive all accrued and unpaid compensation through the date of termination plus reimbursement for all Advances made by it and interest on those Advances as provided in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Trustee will be required to bear all reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses of each party to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and each Rating Agency in connection with any removal or resignation of such Trustee as and to the extent required under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; provided, that if the Trustee is terminated without cause by the holders of Certificates evidencing more than 50% of the aggregate Voting Rights allocated to all of the Certificates as provided in the second preceding paragraph, then such holders will be required to pay all the reasonable costs and expenses of the Trustee necessary to effect the transfer of the rights and obligations (including custody of the Mortgage Loan files) of the Trustee to a successor Trustee. Any successor Trustee must have a combined capital and surplus of at least $50,000,000, and the ratings on its unsecured long term debt set forth above.

In addition, certain provisions regarding the obligations and duties of the Trustee, including those related to resignation and termination, may be subject to amendment in connection with a TIA Applicability Determination. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Amendment” in this prospectus supplement.

The Issuing Entity will indemnify the Trustee (including any capacities in which it serves) and certain related persons against any and all claims, losses, damages, penalties, fines, forfeitures, reasonable and necessary legal fees and related costs, judgments, and any other costs, fees and expenses that the Trustee may sustain in connection with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (including any capacities in which it serves)(including, without limitation, reasonable fees and disbursements of counsel and of all persons not regularly in its employ incurred by the Trustee in any action or proceeding between the Issuing Entity and the Trustee or between the Trustee and any third party or otherwise) arising in respect of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or the Certificates other than those resulting from the negligence, fraud, bad faith or willful misconduct, or the negligent disregard of obligations and duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, of the Trustee. The Trustee will indemnify the Issuing Entity against any loss, liability or reasonable expense (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses) incurred by the Issuing Entity as a result of any willful misconduct, bad faith, fraud or negligence in the performance of the obligations or duties of the Trustee, or by reason of negligent disregard of the Trustee’s obligations or duties, under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. Except in the event of the Trustee’s willful misconduct, bad faith or fraud, in no event will the Trustee be liable for special, punitive, indirect or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever (including but not limited to lost profits), even if the Trustee has been advised of the likelihood of such loss or damage and regardless of the form of action. The Trustee will not be required to expend or risk its own funds or otherwise incur financial liability in the performance of any of its duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, or in the exercise of any of its rights or powers, if in the Trustee’s opinion, the repayment of such funds or adequate indemnity against such risk or liability is not reasonably assured to it.

At any time, for the purpose of meeting any legal requirements of any jurisdiction in which any part of the Issuing Entity, the assets thereof or any property securing the same is located, the Depositor and the Trustee acting jointly will have the power to appoint one or more persons or entities to act (at the expense of (i) the Trustee, if the need to appoint such co-trustee(s) arises from any change in the identity, organization, status,

S-219

power, conflicts, internal policy or other development with respect to the Trustee, and/or (ii) the Issuing Entity, if the need to appoint such co-trustee(s) arises from a change in applicable law or the identity, status or power of the Issuing Entity; provided, however, that in the event the need to appoint such co-trustee(s) arises from a combination of or none of the events described in clause (i) and clause (ii), the expense will be split evenly between the Trustee and the Issuing Entity) as co-trustee or co-trustees, jointly with the Trustee, or separate trustee or separate trustees, of all or any part of the Issuing Entity, and to vest in such co-trustee or separate trustee such powers, duties, obligations, rights and trusts as the Depositor and the Trustee may consider necessary or desirable. The appointment of a co-trustee or separate trustee will not relieve the Trustee of its responsibilities, obligations and liabilities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement except as required by applicable law.

If no Servicer Termination Event has occurred, and after the curing or waiver of all Servicer Termination Events which may have occurred, the Trustee is required to perform only those duties specifically required under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. Upon receipt of the various certificates, reports or other instruments required to be furnished to it, the Trustee is required to examine such documents and to determine whether they conform on their face to the requirements of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

The Trustee will not be accountable for the use or application by the Depositor of any Certificates issued to it or of the proceeds of the sale of such Certificates, or for the use of or application of any funds paid to the Depositor, the Certificate Administrator, the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer in respect of the Mortgage Loans, or for investment of such amounts (except for any investment of such amounts in investments issued by the Trustee in its commercial capacity), nor will the Trustee be required to perform, or be responsible for the manner of performance of, any of the obligations of the Master Servicer (except advancing as described in this prospectus supplement), the Special Servicer or the Certificate Administrator under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement unless the Trustee is acting as the successor to, and is vested with the rights, duties, powers and privileges of, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Certificate Administrator in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

The Certificate Administrator

Citibank, N.A., a national banking association (“Citibank”), will act as the certificate administrator (in such capacity, the “Certificate Administrator”) and the paying agent under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The corporate trust office of the Certificate Administrator responsible for administration of the Issuing Entity is located at 388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor, New York, New York 10013, Attention: Citibank Agency & Trust—CGCMT 2015-GC33 and the office for certificate transfer services is located at 480 Washington Boulevard, 30th Floor, Jersey City, New Jersey 07310, Attention: Citibank Agency & Trust—CGCMT 2015-GC33.

Citibank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup Inc., a Delaware corporation. Citibank performs as certificate administrator and custodian through the Agency and Trust line of business, which is part of the Global Transaction Services division. Citibank has primary corporate trust offices located in both New York and London. Citibank is a leading provider of corporate trust services offering a full range of agency, fiduciary, tender and exchange, depositary and escrow services. As of the end of the second quarter of 2015, Citibank’s Agency and Trust group managed in excess of $5.1 trillion in fixed income and equity investments on behalf of approximately 2,500 corporations worldwide. Since 1987, Citibank Agency and Trust has provided trustee services for asset-backed securities containing pool assets consisting of airplane leases, auto loans and leases, boat loans, commercial loans, commodities, credit cards, durable goods, equipment leases, foreign securities, funding agreement-backed note programs, truck loans, utilities, student loans and commercial and residential mortgages. As of the end of the second quarter of 2015, Citibank acted as trustee, certificate administrator and/or paying agent for approximately 56 transactions backed by commercial mortgages with an aggregate principal balance of approximately $54.1 billion. The Depositor, the Underwriter Entities, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Trustee may maintain banking and other commercial relationships with Citibank and its affiliates.

Under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, Citibank is responsible for securities administration, which includes pool performance calculations, distribution calculations and the preparation of monthly distribution reports. An analyst also will be responsible for the timely delivery of reports to the administration unit for processing all cashflow items. As Certificate Administrator, Citibank is also responsible for the preparation and filing of all REMIC and grantor trust tax returns on behalf of the Issuing Entity and the preparation of monthly reports on Form 10-D, certain current reports on Form 8-K and annual reports on Form 10-K that are required to

S-220

be filed with the SEC on behalf of the Issuing Entity. In the past three years, the Certificate Administrator has not made material changes to the policies and procedures of its securities administration services for CMBS.

There have been no material changes to Citibank’s policies and procedures with respect to its commercial mortgage-backed trustee function other than changes required by applicable laws. In the past three years, Citibank has not materially defaulted in its certificate administrator obligations under any pooling and servicing agreement or caused an early amortization or other performance triggering event because of its performance as trustee or certificate administrator with respect to CMBS.

Citibank is acting as Certificate Administrator of this CMBS transaction. In the ordinary course of business, Citibank is involved in a number of legal proceedings, including in connection with its role as trustee of certain RMBS transactions. Certain of these Citibank as trustee-related matters are disclosed herein.

On June 18, 2014, a civil action was filed against Citibank in the Supreme Court of the State of New York by a group of investors in 48 private-label RMBS trusts for which Citibank allegedly serves or did serve as trustee, asserting claims for purported violations of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence based on Citibank’s alleged failure to perform its duties as trustee for the 48 RMBS trusts. On November 24, 2014, plaintiffs sought leave to withdraw this action. On the same day, a smaller subset of similar plaintiff investors in 27 private-label RMBS trusts for which Citibank allegedly serves or did serve as trustee, filed a new civil action against Citibank in the Southern District of New York asserting similar claims as the prior action filed in state court. In January 2015, the court closed plaintiffs’ original state court action. Citibank’s motion to dismiss the federal complaint was fully briefed as of May 13, 2015. On September 8, 2015, the court dismissed all claims as to 24 of the 27 trusts and allowed certain of the claims to proceed as to the other three trusts.

On August 19, 2015, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as Receiver for a financial institution filed a civil action against Citibank in the Southern District of New York. This action relates to one private-label RMBS trust for which Citibank formerly served as trustee. FDIC asserts claims for breach of contract, violation of the Streit Act, and violation of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939.

There can be no assurances as to the outcome of litigation or the possible impact of litigation on the trustee or the RMBS trusts. However, Citibank denies liability and continues to vigorously defend against these litigations. Furthermore, neither the above-disclosed litigations nor any other pending legal proceeding involving Citibank will materially affect Citibank’s ability to perform its duties as Certificate Administrator under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for this CMBS transaction.

The information set forth under this heading “—The Certificate Administrator” has been provided by Citibank. Citibank is providing such information at the Depositor’s request to assist it with the preparation of this prospectus supplement. None of the Depositor, the underwriters, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Trustee, the Sponsors or any of their affiliates takes any responsibility for this information or makes any representation or warranty as to its accuracy or completeness.

The Certificate Administrator is required to maintain a rating on its unsecured long term debt of at least (A) “BBB+” by Fitch Ratings, Inc., and (B) “Baa2” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (or such other rating with respect to which the Rating Agencies have provided a Rating Agency Confirmation).

The Certificate Administrator may resign at any time by giving written notice to, among others, the other parties to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. However, no such resignation will be effective until a successor has been appointed. Upon such notice, the Master Servicer will appoint a successor Certificate Administrator. If no successor Certificate Administrator has been appointed and accepted such appointment within one month after the giving of such notice of resignation, the resigning Certificate Administrator may petition the court for appointment of a successor Certificate Administrator.

The Depositor may remove the Certificate Administrator (and appoint a successor Certificate Administrator) if, among other things, the Certificate Administrator ceases to be eligible to continue as such under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or if at any time the Certificate Administrator becomes incapable of acting, or is adjudged bankrupt or insolvent, or a receiver of the Certificate Administrator or its property is appointed or any public officer takes charge or control of the Certificate Administrator or of its property. The holders of Certificates evidencing more than 50% of the aggregate Voting Rights allocated to all of the Certificates may remove the Certificate

S-221

Administrator (and appoint a successor Certificate Administrator) upon written notice to, among others, the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator.

Any resignation or removal of the Certificate Administrator and appointment of a successor Certificate Administrator will not become effective until acceptance by the successor Certificate Administrator of the appointment.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon any resignation or termination of the Certificate Administrator under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Certificate Administrator will continue to be entitled to receive all accrued and unpaid compensation through the date of termination. The Certificate Administrator will be required to bear all reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses of each party to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and each Rating Agency in connection with any removal or resignation of such Certificate Administrator as and to the extent required under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement provided, that if the Certificate Administrator is terminated without cause by the holders of Certificates evidencing more than 50% of the aggregate Voting Rights allocated to all of the Certificates as provided in the second preceding paragraph, then such holders will be required to pay all the reasonable costs and expenses of the Certificate Administrator necessary to effect the transfer of the rights and obligations (including custody of the Mortgage Loan files) of the Certificate Administrator to a successor Certificate Administrator. Any successor Certificate Administrator must have a combined capital and surplus of at least $50,000,000, and the ratings on its unsecured long-term debt set forth above.

In addition, certain provisions regarding the obligations and duties of the Certificate Administrator, including those related to resignation and termination, may be subject to amendment in connection with a TIA Applicability Determination. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Amendment” in this prospectus supplement.

The Issuing Entity will indemnify the Certificate Administrator and certain related persons against any and all claims, losses, damages, penalties, fines, forfeitures, reasonable and necessary legal fees and related costs, judgments, and any other costs, fees and expenses that the Certificate Administrator may sustain in connection with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (including, without limitation, reasonable fees and disbursements of counsel and of all persons not regularly in its employ incurred by the Certificate Administrator in any action or proceeding between the Issuing Entity and the Certificate Administrator or between the Certificate Administrator and any third party or otherwise) arising in respect of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or the Certificates other than those resulting from the negligence, fraud, bad faith or willful misconduct, or the negligent disregard of obligations and duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, of the Certificate Administrator. The Certificate Administrator will indemnify the Issuing Entity against any loss, liability or reasonable expense (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses) incurred by the Issuing Entity as a result of any willful misconduct, bad faith, fraud or negligence in the performance of the obligations or duties of the Certificate Administrator, or by reason of negligent disregard of the Certificate Administrator’s obligations or duties, under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. Except in the event of the Certificate Administrator’s willful misconduct, bad faith or fraud, in no event will the Certificate Administrator be liable for special, punitive, indirect or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever (including but not limited to lost profits), even if the Certificate Administrator has been advised of the likelihood of such loss or damage and regardless of the form of action. The Certificate Administrator will not be required to expend or risk its own funds or otherwise incur financial liability in the performance of any of its duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, or in the exercise of any of its rights or powers, if in the Certificate Administrator’s opinion, the repayment of such funds or adequate indemnity against such risk or liability is not reasonably assured to it.

The Certificate Administrator is required to perform only those duties specifically required under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. Upon receipt of the various certificates, reports or other instruments required to be furnished to it, the Certificate Administrator is required to examine such documents and to determine whether they conform on their face to the requirements of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

The Certificate Administrator will not be accountable for the use or application by the Depositor of any Certificates issued to it or of the proceeds of the sale of such Certificates, or for the use of or application of any funds paid to the Depositor, the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer in respect of the Mortgage Loans, or for investment of such amounts (except for any investment of such amounts in investments issued by the Certificate Administrator in its commercial capacity), nor will the Certificate Administrator be required to perform, or be responsible for the manner of performance of, any of the obligations of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee or the Operating Advisor under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

S-222

Pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Certificate Administrator, at the cost and expense of the Depositor (other than with respect to the Distribution Date statements), based upon reports, documents, and other information provided to the Certificate Administrator, will be obligated to file with the SEC, in respect of the Issuing Entity and the Certificates, copies of the annual reports and of the information, documents and other reports (or copies of such portions of any of the foregoing as the SEC may from time to time by rules and regulations prescribe) required to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and any other Form 8-K reports required to be filed pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

The Depositor may terminate the Certificate Administrator upon 5 business days’ notice if the Certificate Administrator fails to comply with certain of its reporting obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

Trustee and Certificate Administrator Fee

Pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Trustee and Certificate Administrator will be entitled to receive a monthly fee (the “Trustee/Certificate Administrator Fee”). The Trustee/Certificate Administrator Fee will be payable monthly from amounts received in respect of the Mortgage Loans and, as to each Mortgage Loan, will accrue at 0.0046% per annum (the “Trustee/Certificate Administrator Fee Rate”) which, together with the Servicing Fee Rate, the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate and the Operating Advisor Fee Rate, is equal to the per annum rate set forth on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as the “Administrative Fee Rate”. The Trustee/Certificate Administrator Fee will be paid monthly to the Certificate Administrator and the Certificate Administrator will pay the Trustee its portion of the Trustee/Certificate Administrator Fee in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Trustee/Certificate Administrator Fee will accrue on the Stated Principal Balance of each Mortgage Loan and will be calculated on the same interest accrual basis as the related Mortgage Loan and prorated for any partial periods.

The Operating Advisor

Situs Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“SH”), will act as operating advisor under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (in such capacity, the “Operating Advisor”).

The principal executive offices of SH are located at 5065 Westheimer, Suite 700E, Houston, Texas 77056. SH is a wholly owned subsidiary of an affiliated entity of Stone Point Capital LLC (“Stone Point”). Stone Point is a global private equity firm that has raised over $13 billion of committed capital. Stone Point targets investments in the global financial services industries, including insurance underwriting and distribution, mortgage services, benefits and healthcare, outsourcing services, specialty lending, asset management and retirement savings, and banking and depository institutions.

SH has a special servicer rating of “CSS2” from Fitch Ratings, Inc., “MOR CS1/Stable” from Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC and is on Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services Select Servicer list as a United States Commercial Mortgage Special Servicer ranked “Above Average.” SH is approved by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Inc. as a special servicer for CMBS transactions. As of July 31, 2015, SH directly managed 36 CMBS specially serviced assets with an aggregate unpaid principal balance (“UPB”) of approximately $426.6 million and 107 nonperforming whole loans with an aggregate UPB of approximately $985.9 million; and SH is the named special servicer on 14 CMBS transactions with an aggregate UPB of approximately $13.117 billion and 11 CMBS Single Family Rental transactions with an aggregate UPB of approximately $6.557 billion. As of July 31, 2015, SH is the named operating advisor, or equivalent, for twenty-seven (27) CMBS transactions with an aggregate UPB of approximately $27.5 billion.

SH and its affiliates (collectively “Situs”) are involved in the commercial real estate advisory business and engage principally in:

· real estate consulting,

· primary servicing,

· CMBS special servicing,

· asset management, and

S-223

· due diligence and underwriting.

Since 1985, Situs has provided commercial real estate advisory, due diligence and business solutions to the lending and real estate industries. Situs has major offices located across the U.S. in San Francisco, New York, and Houston as well as offices in London, Copenhagen and Frankfurt. Situs provides services to financial institutions, investors and servicers as well as to agencies of the United States government.

SH has developed policies and procedures for the performance of its operating advisor, servicing and special servicing obligations in compliance with the applicable governing agreements.

No securitization transaction involving commercial or multifamily mortgage loans in which Situs was acting as primary servicer, master servicer, special servicer or operating advisor has experienced an event of default as a result of any action or inaction performed by Situs in its applicable capacity.

From time to time, SH and its affiliates are parties to lawsuits and other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. SH does not believe that any such lawsuits or legal proceedings would, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its business or its ability to serve as Operating Advisor.

SH is not an affiliate of any of the Depositor, the Sponsors, the Originators, the Trustee, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, any Outside Servicer or the Certificate Administrator. SH assisted GSMC, Rialto, KGS and RAIT with the preparation of certain due diligence materials for certain Mortgage Loans contributed by each such Sponsor to the Mortgage Pool.

The foregoing information under this heading has been provided by SH. None of the Depositor, the underwriters, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Sponsors, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator or any of their affiliates takes any responsibility for this information or makes any representation or warranty as to its accuracy or completeness.

Certain terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement regarding the Operating Advisor’s removal, replacement, resignation or transfer are described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Certain Matters Regarding the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Operating Advisor” and “—Operating Advisor” in this prospectus supplement. Certain limitations on the Operating Advisor’s liability under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Certain Matters Regarding the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Operating Advisor” in this prospectus supplement.

For further information regarding the rights and obligations of the Operating Advisor under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, see “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Operating Advisor” in this prospectus supplement.

Servicers

General

Each of the Master Servicer (directly or through one or more sub-servicers (which includes the primary servicers)) and the Special Servicer will be required to service and administer the Serviced Loans for which it is responsible as described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement. The Master Servicer may delegate and/or assign some or all of its servicing obligations and duties with respect to some or all of the Serviced Loans to one or more third party sub-servicers, with the consent of the Depositor. Certain servicing and administrative functions may also be provided by one or more primary servicers that previously serviced the mortgage loans for the applicable loan seller. The Master Servicer will be responsible for paying the servicing fees of any sub-servicer or primary servicer. Notwithstanding any sub-servicing agreement or primary servicing agreement, the Master Servicer will remain primarily liable to the Trustee and the Certificateholders (and any Serviced Companion Loan Holders) for the servicing and administering of the Serviced Loans in accordance with the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement without diminution of such obligation or liability by virtue of such sub-servicing agreement or primary servicing agreement. The Special Servicer will not be permitted to appoint sub-servicers with respect to any of its servicing obligations and duties, other than in the limited circumstances described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.

S-224

The Master Servicer

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”) will act as the master servicer for all of the Mortgage Loans to be deposited into the Issuing Entity and the primary servicer for the Serviced Companion Loans (in such capacity, the “Master Servicer”). Wells Fargo, the Master Servicer, is also the master servicer and custodian under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which governs the servicing of The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination, and the general master servicer, certificate administrator, tax administrator and custodian under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which governs the servicing of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination. Wells Fargo is a national banking association organized under the laws of the United States of America, and is a wholly-owned direct and indirect subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company. On December 31, 2008, Wells Fargo & Company acquired Wachovia Corporation, the owner of Wachovia Bank, National Association (“Wachovia”), and Wachovia Corporation merged with and into Wells Fargo & Company. On March 20, 2010, Wachovia merged with and into Wells Fargo. Like Wells Fargo, Wachovia acted as master servicer of securitized commercial and multifamily mortgage loans and, following the merger of the holding companies, Wells Fargo and Wachovia integrated their two servicing platforms under a senior management team that is a combination of both legacy Wells Fargo managers and legacy Wachovia managers.

The principal west coast commercial mortgage master servicing offices of Wells Fargo are located at MAC A0227-020, 1901 Harrison Street, Oakland, California 94612. The principal east coast commercial mortgage master servicing offices of Wells Fargo are located at MAC D1086, 550 South Tryon Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28202.

Wells Fargo has been master servicing securitized commercial and multifamily mortgage loans in excess of ten years. Wells Fargo’s primary servicing system runs on McCracken Financial Solutions software, Strategy CS. Wells Fargo reports to trustees and certificate administrators in the CREFC^® format. The following table sets forth information about Wells Fargo’s portfolio of master or primary serviced commercial and multifamily mortgage loans (including loans in securitization transactions and loans owned by other investors) as of the dates indicated:

Commercial and Multifamily Mortgage Loans	As of 12/31/2012	As of 12/31/2013	As of 12/31/2014	As of 6/30/2015
By Approximate Number:	35,189	33,354	33,590	33,192
By Approximate Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance (in billions):	$428.52	$434.37	$474.38	$484.24

Within this portfolio, as of June 30, 2015, are approximately 24,315 commercial and multifamily mortgage loans with an unpaid principal balance of approximately $401.6 billion related to commercial mortgage-backed securities or commercial real estate collateralized debt obligation securities. In addition to servicing loans related to commercial mortgage-backed securities and commercial real estate collateralized debt obligation securities, Wells Fargo also services whole loans for itself and a variety of investors. The properties securing loans in Wells Fargo’s servicing portfolio, as of June 30, 2015, were located in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, Mexico, the Bahamas, the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico and include retail, office, multifamily, industrial, hotel and other types of income-producing properties.

In its master servicing and primary servicing activities, Wells Fargo utilizes a mortgage-servicing technology platform with multiple capabilities and reporting functions. This platform allows Wells Fargo to process mortgage servicing activities including, but not limited to: (i) performing account maintenance; (ii) tracking borrower communications; (iii) tracking real estate tax escrows and payments, insurance escrows and payments, replacement reserve escrows and operating statement data and rent rolls; (iv) entering and updating transaction data; and (v) generating various reports.

S-225

The following table sets forth information regarding principal and interest advances and servicing advances made by Wells Fargo, as master servicer, on commercial and multifamily mortgage loans included in commercial mortgage-backed securitizations. The information set forth below is the average amount of such advances outstanding over the periods indicated (expressed as a dollar amount and as a percentage of Wells Fargo’s portfolio, as of the end of each such period, of master serviced commercial and multifamily mortgage loans included in commercial mortgage-backed securitizations).

Period	Approximate Securitized Master-Serviced Portfolio (UPB)*	Approximate Outstanding Advances (P&I and PPA)*	Approximate Outstanding Advances as % of UPB
Calendar Year 2012	$    331,765,453,800	$    2,133,375,220	0.64%
Calendar Year 2013	$    346,011,017,466	$    2,158,219,403	0.62%
Calendar Year 2014	$    377,947,659,331	$    1,750,352,607	0.46%
YTD Q2 2015	$    388,875,062,108	$    1,714,604,388	0.44%

* “UPB” means unpaid principal balance, “P&I” means principal and interest advances and “PPA” means property protection advances.

Wells Fargo is rated by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC as a primary servicer, a master servicer and a special servicer of commercial mortgage loans. Wells Fargo’s servicer ratings by each of these agencies are outlined below:

	Fitch	S&P	Morningstar
Primary Servicer:	CPS1-	Strong	MOR CS1
Master Servicer:	CMS1-	Strong	MOR CS1
Special Servicer:	CSS2	Above Average	MOR CS2

The long-term deposits of Wells Fargo are rated “AA-” by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, “Aa1” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and “AA” by Fitch Ratings, Inc. The short-term deposits of Wells Fargo are rated “A-1+” by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, “P-1” by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and “F1+” by Fitch Ratings, Inc.

Wells Fargo has developed policies, procedures and controls relating to its servicing functions to maintain compliance with applicable servicing agreements and servicing standards, including procedures for handling delinquent loans during the period prior to the occurrence of a special servicing transfer event. Wells Fargo’s master servicing policies and procedures are updated periodically to keep pace with the changes in the commercial mortgage-backed securities industry and have been generally consistent for the last three years in all material respects. The only significant changes in Wells Fargo’s policies and procedures have come in response to changes in federal or state law or investor requirements, such as updates issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association or Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.

Wells Fargo may perform any of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement through one or more third-party vendors, affiliates or subsidiaries. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Master Servicer will remain responsible for its duties thereunder. Wells Fargo may engage third-party vendors to provide technology or process efficiencies. Wells Fargo monitors its third-party vendors in compliance with its internal procedures and applicable law. Wells Fargo has entered into contracts with third-party vendors for the following functions:

· provision of Strategy and Strategy CS software;

· tracking and reporting of flood zone changes;

· abstracting of leasing consent requirements contained in loan documents;

· legal representation;

S-226

· assembly of data regarding buyer and seller (borrower) with respect to proposed loan assumptions and preparation of loan assumption package for review by Wells Fargo;

· performance of property inspections;

· performance of tax parcel searches based on property legal description, monitoring and reporting of delinquent taxes, and collection and payment of taxes; and

· Uniform Commercial Code searches and filings.

Wells Fargo may also enter into agreements with certain firms to act as a primary servicer and to provide cashiering or non-cashiering sub-servicing on the Mortgage Loans and the Serviced Companion Loans. Wells Fargo monitors and reviews the performance of sub-servicers appointed by it. Generally, all amounts received by Wells Fargo on the Mortgage Loans and the Serviced Companion Loans will initially be deposited into a common clearing account with collections on other mortgage loans serviced by Wells Fargo and will then be allocated and transferred to the appropriate account as described in this prospectus supplement. On the day any amount is to be disbursed by Wells Fargo, that amount is transferred to a common disbursement account prior to disbursement.

Wells Fargo will not have primary responsibility for custody services of original documents evidencing the Mortgage Loans or the Serviced Companion Loans. On occasion, Wells Fargo may have custody of certain of such documents as are necessary for enforcement actions involving the Mortgage Loans, the Serviced Companion Loans or otherwise. To the extent Wells Fargo performs custodial functions as a servicer, documents will be maintained in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard.

A Wells Fargo proprietary website (www.wellsfargo.com/com/comintro) provides investors with access to investor reports for commercial mortgage-backed securitization transactions for which Wells Fargo is master servicer, and also provides borrowers with access to current and historical loan and property information for these transactions.

Wells Fargo & Company files reports with the SEC as required under the Exchange Act. Such reports include information regarding Wells Fargo and may be obtained at the website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov.

There are no legal proceedings pending against Wells Fargo, or to which any property of Wells Fargo is subject, that are material to the Certificateholders, nor does Wells Fargo have actual knowledge of any proceedings of this type contemplated by governmental authorities.

The Master Servicer will enter into one or more agreements with the Sponsors to purchase the master servicing rights to the related Mortgage Loans and the primary servicing rights with respect to certain of the related Mortgage Loans (other than any Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan) and the Serviced Companion Loans and/or the right to be appointed as the master servicer or primary servicer, as the case may be, with respect to such Mortgage Loans.

Pursuant to an interim servicing agreement between Wells Fargo and CGMRC, a Sponsor and an Originator, Wells Fargo acts as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans owned from time to time by CGMRC, which are expected to include, prior to their inclusion in the Issuing Entity, some or all of the Mortgage Loans to be contributed to this securitization transaction by CGMRC.

Pursuant to an interim servicing agreement between Wells Fargo and GSMC, a Sponsor and an Originator, Wells Fargo acts as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans owned from time to time by GSMC, which may include, prior to their inclusion in the Issuing Entity, some or all of the Mortgage Loans to be contributed to this securitization transaction by GSMC.

Wells Fargo is the purchaser under a repurchase agreement with Rialto, or with a wholly-owned subsidiary or affiliate of Rialto, for the purpose of providing short term warehousing of mortgage loans originated or acquired by Rialto. Pursuant to an interim servicing agreement between Wells Fargo and Rialto, a Sponsor and an Originator, Wells Fargo acts as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans owned from time to time by Rialto,

S-227

which are expected to include, prior to their inclusion in the Issuing Entity, some or all of the Mortgage Loans to be contributed to this securitization transaction by Rialto.

Pursuant to an interim servicing agreement between Wells Fargo and KGS, a Sponsor and an Originator, Wells Fargo acts as interim servicer with respect to certain mortgage loans owned from time to time by KGS, which are expected to include, prior to their inclusion in the Issuing Entity, some or all of the Mortgage Loans to be contributed to this securitization transaction by KGS.

The foregoing information regarding Wells Fargo under the heading “—Servicers—The Master Servicer” has been provided by Wells Fargo. None of the Depositor, the underwriters, the Operating Advisor, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Special Servicer or any of their affiliates takes any responsibility for this information or makes any representation or warranty as to its accuracy or completeness.

The Special Servicer

LNR Partners, LLC (“LNR Partners”), a Florida limited liability company and a subsidiary of LNR Property LLC (“LNR”), a Delaware limited liability company, will initially be appointed as special servicer for the Mortgage Loans (and the related Companion Loans) (in such capacity, the “Special Servicer”). The principal executive offices of LNR Partners are located at 1601 Washington Avenue, Suite 700, Miami Beach, Florida 33139 and its telephone number is (305)-695-5600.

LNR through its subsidiaries, affiliates and joint ventures, is involved in the real estate finance, management and development business and engages in, among other activities:

· acquiring, developing, repositioning, managing and selling commercial and multifamily residential real estate properties,

· investing in high-yielding real estate loans, and

· investing in, and managing as special servicer, unrated and non-investment grade rated commercial mortgage backed securities.

LNR Partners and its affiliates have substantial experience in working out loans and in performing the other obligations of the special servicer as more particularly described in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, including, but not limited to, processing borrower requests for lender consent to assumptions, leases, easements, partial releases and expansion and/or redevelopment of the mortgaged properties. LNR Partners and its affiliates have been engaged in the special servicing of commercial real estate assets for over 22 years. The number of CMBS pools specially serviced by LNR Partners and its affiliates has increased from 46 in December 1998 to 153 as of June 30, 2015. More specifically, LNR Partners (and its predecessors in interest) acted as special servicer with respect to: (a) 84 domestic CMBS pools as of December 31, 2001, with a then current face value in excess of $53 billion; (b) 101 domestic CMBS pools as of December 31, 2002, with a then current face value in excess of $67 billion; (c) 113 domestic CMBS pools as of December 31, 2003, with a then current face value in excess of $79 billion; (d) 134 domestic CMBS pools as of December 31, 2004, with a then current face value in excess of $111 billion; (e) 142 domestic CMBS pools as of December 31, 2005, with a then current face value in excess of $148 billion; (f) 143 domestic CMBS pools as of December 31, 2006, with a then current face value in excess of $201 billion; (g) 143 domestic CMBS pools as of December 31, 2007 with a then current face value in excess of $228 billion; (h) 138 domestic CMBS pools as of December 31, 2008 with a then current face value in excess of $210 billion; (i) 136 domestic CMBS pools as of December 31, 2009 with a then current face value in excess of $191 billion; (j) 144 domestic CMBS pools as of December 31, 2010 with a then current face value in excess of $201 billion; (k) 140 domestic CMBS pools as of December 31, 2011 with a then current face value in excess of $176 billion; (l) 131 domestic CMBS pools as of December 31, 2012 with a then current face value in excess of $136 billion; (m) 141 domestic CMBS pools as of December 31, 2013 with a then current face value in excess of $133 billion; (n) 152 domestic CMBS pools as of December 31, 2014 with a then current face value in excess of $135 billion; and (o) 153 domestic CMBS pools as of June 30, 2015 with a then current face value in excess of $124 billion. As of June 30, 2015, LNR Partners has resolved approximately $60.6 billion of U.S. commercial and multifamily loans over the past 22 years, including approximately $1.1 billion of U.S. commercial and multifamily mortgage loans during 2001, $1.9 billion of U.S. commercial and multifamily mortgage loans during 2002, $1.5 billion of U.S. commercial and multifamily mortgage loans during 2003, $2.1 billion of U.S. commercial and

S-228

multifamily mortgage loans during 2004, $2.4 billion of U.S. commercial and multifamily mortgage loans during 2005, $0.9 billion of U.S. commercial and multifamily mortgage loans during 2006, $1.4 billion of U.S. commercial and multifamily mortgage loans during 2007, $1.0 billion of U.S. commercial and multifamily mortgage loans during 2008, $1.2 billion of U.S. commercial and multifamily mortgage loans during 2009, $7.7 billion of U.S. commercial and multifamily mortgage loans during 2010, $10.9 billion of U.S. commercial and multifamily mortgage loans during 2011, $11.7 billion of U.S. commercial and multifamily mortgage loans during 2012, $6.5 billion of U.S. commercial and multifamily mortgage loans during 2013; $6.3 billion of U.S. commercial and multifamily mortgage loans during 2014 and $2.9 billion of U.S. commercial and multifamily mortgage loans during the second quarter of 2015.

LNR or one of its affiliates generally seeks investments where it has the right to appoint LNR Partners as the special servicer. LNR Partners and its affiliates have regional offices located across the country in Florida, Georgia, Massachusetts, California, New York and North Carolina and in England and Germany. As of June 30, 2015, LNR Partners had approximately 185 employees responsible for the special servicing of commercial real estate assets. As of June 30, 2015, LNR Partners and its affiliates specially service a portfolio, which included approximately 9,320 assets across the United States and various international properties with a then current face value of approximately $124.8 billion, all of which are commercial real estate assets. Those commercial real estate assets include mortgage loans secured by the same types of income producing properties as secure the Mortgage Loans backing the Certificates. Accordingly, the assets of LNR Partners and its affiliates may, depending upon the particular circumstances, including the nature and location of such assets, compete with the mortgaged real properties securing the underlying mortgage loans for tenants, purchasers, financing and so forth. LNR Partners does not service any assets other than commercial real estate assets.

LNR Partners maintains internal and external watch lists, corresponds with master servicers on a monthly basis and conducts overall deal surveillance and shadow servicing. LNR Partners has developed distinct strategies and procedures for working with borrowers on problem loans (caused by delinquencies, bankruptcies or other breaches of the Mortgage Loan documents) designed to maximize value from the assets for the benefit of the certificateholders. These strategies and procedures vary on a case by case basis, and include, but are not limited to, liquidation of the underlying collateral, note sales, discounted pay-offs, and borrower negotiation or workout in accordance with the Servicing Standard. Generally, four basic factors are considered by LNR Partners as part of its analysis and determination of what strategies and procedures to utilize in connection with problem loans. They are (i) the condition and type of mortgaged property, (ii) the borrower, (iii) the jurisdiction in which the mortgaged property is located and (iv) the actual terms, conditions and provisions of the underlying loan documents. After each of these items is evaluated and considered, LNR Partners’ strategy is guided by the servicing standard and all relevant provisions of the applicable pooling and servicing agreement pertaining to specially serviced and REO mortgage loans.

LNR Partners has the highest ratings afforded to special servicers by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and is rated “CSS1-” by Fitch Ratings, Inc.

There have not been, during the past three years, any material changes to the policies or procedures of LNR Partners in the servicing function it will perform under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. LNR Partners has not engaged, and currently does not have any plans to engage, any sub-servicers to perform on its behalf any of its duties with respect to this securitization transaction. LNR Partners does not believe that its financial condition will have any adverse effect on the performance of its duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and, accordingly, will not have any material impact on the Mortgage Pool performance or the performance of the Certificates. Generally, LNR Partners’ servicing functions under pooling and servicing agreements do not include collection on the pool assets, however LNR Partners does maintain certain operating accounts with respect to REO mortgage loans in accordance with the terms of the applicable pooling and servicing agreements and consistent with the servicing standard set forth in each of such pooling and servicing agreements. LNR Partners does not have any material advancing obligations with respect to the CMBS pools as to which it acts as special servicer. Generally, LNR Partners has the right, but not the obligation, to make property related servicing advances in emergency situations with respect to CMBS pools as to which it acts as special servicer.

LNR Partners will not have primary responsibility for custody services of original documents evidencing the Mortgage Loans. On occasion, LNR Partners may have custody of certain of such documents as necessary for enforcement actions involving particular Mortgage Loans or otherwise. To the extent that LNR Partners has custody of any such documents, such documents will be maintained in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard.

S-229

No securitization transaction involving commercial or multifamily mortgage loans in which LNR Partners was acting as special servicer has experienced an event of default as a result of any action or inaction by LNR Partners as special servicer. LNR Partners has not been terminated as servicer in a commercial mortgage loan securitization, either due to a servicing default or to application of a servicing performance test or trigger. In addition, there has been no previous disclosure of material noncompliance with servicing criteria by LNR Partners with respect to any other securitization transaction involving commercial or multifamily mortgage loans in which LNR Partners was acting as special servicer.

There are, to the actual current knowledge of LNR Partners, no special or unique factors of a material nature involved in special servicing the particular types of assets included in the subject securitization, as compared to the types of assets specially serviced by LNR Partners in other commercial mortgage backed securitization pools generally, for which LNR Partners has developed processes and procedures which materially differ from the processes and procedures employed by LNR Partners in connection with its special servicing of commercial mortgaged backed securitization pools generally.

There are currently no legal proceedings pending, and no legal proceedings known to be contemplated, by governmental authorities, against LNR Partners or of which any of its property is the subject, that are material to the Certificateholders.

LNR Partners is not an affiliate of the Depositor, the underwriters, the Issuing Entity, the Master Servicer, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Operating Advisor, any Sponsor, or any Originator.

Except as otherwise disclosed in this prospectus supplement and except for LNR Partners acting as special servicer for this securitization transaction and special servicer for the CGCMT 2015-P1 Securitization, there are no specific relationships that are material involving or relating to this securitization transaction or the securitized mortgage loans between LNR Partners or any of its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Depositor, the Issuing Entity, any Sponsor, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, any significant obligor, any Originator, the Master Servicer or the Operating Advisor, on the other hand, that currently exist or that existed during the past two years. In addition, except as otherwise disclosed in this prospectus supplement, there are no business relationships, agreements, arrangements, transactions or understandings that have been entered into outside the ordinary course of business or on terms other than would be obtained in an arm’s length transaction with an unrelated third party between LNR Partners or any of its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Depositor, the Issuing Entity, any Sponsor, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, any Originator, the Master Servicer or the Operating Advisor, on the other hand, that currently exist or that existed during the past two years and that are material to an investor’s understanding of the Certificates.

LNR Partners is the special servicer under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, pursuant to which The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination is being serviced. LNR Partners is also affiliated with LNR Securities Holdings, LLC, which entity, or an affiliate thereof, is expected to own a majority of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H Certificates issued in connection with this transaction and appoint itself, or an affiliate thereof, as the Controlling Class Representative.

The foregoing information regarding LNR Partners under the heading “—Servicers—The Special Servicer” has been provided by LNR Partners. None of the Depositor, the underwriters, the Master Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, or any of their affiliates takes any responsibility for this information or makes any representation or warranty as to its accuracy or completeness.

The Special Servicer will be required to pay all expenses incurred in connection with its responsibilities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (subject to reimbursement as described in this prospectus supplement).

The Special Servicer may be terminated, with respect to the Mortgage Loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (other than any Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination) (i) by the applicable Certificateholders (if a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing) and (ii) by the Controlling Class Representative (if a Control Termination Event does not exist and except with respect to an Excluded Mortgage Loan) (a) for cause at any time and (b) without cause if either (i) LNR Partners, LLC or an affiliate thereof is no longer the Special Servicer or (ii) LNR Securities Holdings, LLC or an affiliate thereof owns less than 15% of the Certificate Principal Amount of the then Controlling Class of Certificates, in each case, upon satisfaction of certain conditions specified in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and, in the case of any Serviced Loan Combination, the related Co-Lender Agreement. The Special Servicer may be removed and replaced with respect to a

S-230

Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination, with or without cause at any time, at the direction of the related Outside Controlling Note Holder, provided that its rights to remove LNR Partners, LLC as special servicer without cause shall be limited as described above if so provided in the related Co-Lender Agreement.

The Special Servicer may resign under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement as described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Certain Matters Regarding the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Operating Advisor” in this prospectus supplement.

Certain duties and obligations of LNR Partners as the Special Servicer and the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Mortgage Loans,” “—Enforcement of ‘Due-On-Sale’ and ‘Due-On-Encumbrance’ Clauses,” “—Inspections,” and “Description of the Offered Certificates—Appraisal Reduction Amounts” in this prospectus supplement. The Special Servicer’s ability to waive or modify any terms, fees, penalties or payments on the Mortgage Loans and the potential effect of that ability on the potential cash flows from the Mortgage Loans are described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans—Modifications, Waivers and Amendments” in this prospectus supplement.

The Special Servicer and various related persons and entities will be entitled to be indemnified by the Issuing Entity for certain losses and liabilities incurred by the Special Servicer as described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Certain Matters Regarding the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Operating Advisor” in this prospectus supplement.

The Outside Servicers and the Outside Special Servicers

The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination is being serviced pursuant to the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, and LNR Partners, as special servicer.

The Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination is being serviced pursuant to the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as general master servicer, and CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as general special servicer.

Servicing Compensation, Operating Advisor Compensation and Payment of Expenses

Master Servicing Compensation. The fee of the Master Servicer (the “Servicing Fee”) will be payable monthly from amounts received in respect of the related Mortgage Loan and any related Serviced Companion Loan (including any Specially Serviced Loan and any Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan) or any successor REO Mortgage Loan or successor REO Companion Loan. With respect to each such Mortgage Loan and Serviced Companion Loan (including each Specially Serviced Loan and each Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan) or any successor REO Mortgage Loan or successor REO Companion Loan, the Servicing Fee will: (a) accrue on the related Stated Principal Balance at a fixed annual rate (the “Servicing Fee Rate”), which, together with the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate (in the case of a Mortgage Loan), the Trustee/Certificate Administrator Fee Rate (in the case of a Mortgage Loan) and the Operating Advisor Fee Rate (in the case of a Mortgage Loan), is equal to the per annum rate set forth on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as the Administrative Fee Rate with respect to such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan; (b) be calculated on the same basis as interest is calculated on the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan, and (c) be prorated for partial periods. The Servicing Fee includes (i) all amounts required to be paid to any primary servicer or subservicer, and (ii) (a) with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan, the 0.0025% per annum servicing fee required to be paid to the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer, and (b) with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan, the 0.01% per annum servicing fee required to be paid to the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer.

With respect to any Distribution Date, the Master Servicer will be entitled to retain any Prepayment Interest Excesses received on the Serviced Loans to the extent not needed to make Compensating Interest Payments. In addition to the Servicing Fee, the Master Servicer will be entitled to retain, as additional servicing compensation (a) a specified percentage (which may be either 50% or 100% for performing Serviced Loans, and 0% for Specially Serviced Loans) of Excess Modification Fees, Excess Penalty Charges, Consent Fees, Ancillary Fees (other than fees for insufficient or returned checks), extension fees and Assumption Fees with respect to each Serviced Loan, (b) 100% of any assumption application fees with respect to each Serviced Loan that is not a

S-231

Specially Serviced Loan, any defeasance fee received in connection with the defeasance of a Serviced Loan, and (c) 100% of fees for insufficient or returned checks actually received from borrowers on all Serviced Loans. The Master Servicer also is authorized but not required to invest or direct the investment of funds held in the Collection Account in certain investments permitted under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and the Master Servicer will be entitled to retain any interest or other income earned on those funds and will bear any losses resulting from the investment of these funds, except as set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Master Servicer also is entitled to retain any interest earned on any servicing escrow account to the extent the interest is not required to be paid to the related borrowers.

Although the Master Servicer is required to service and administer the Serviced Loans in accordance with the Servicing Standard and, accordingly, without regard to its rights to receive compensation under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, additional servicing compensation in the nature of assumption and modification fees may under certain circumstances provide the Master Servicer with an economic disincentive to comply with this standard.

The Master Servicer will be entitled to designate a portion of the Servicing Fee accrued on the Mortgage Loans and the Serviced Companion Loans at a specified rate per annum, the right to which portion will be transferable by the Master Servicer to other parties. That specified rate will be subject to reduction at any time following any resignation of the Master Servicer or any termination of the Master Servicer for cause, in each case to the extent reasonably necessary for the trustee to appoint a successor Master Servicer that satisfies the requirements of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

“Consent Fees” means, with respect to any Serviced Loan, any and all fees actually paid by a borrower with respect to any consent or approval required pursuant to the terms of the Serviced Loan documents that does not involve a modification evidenced by a signed writing, assumption, extension, waiver or amendment of the terms of the Serviced Loan documents.

“Excess Modification Fees” means, with respect to any Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable), the sum of (A) the excess of (i) any and all Modification Fees with respect to a modification, waiver, extension or amendment of any of the terms of a Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable), over (ii) all unpaid or unreimbursed Advances and additional expenses of the Issuing Entity (including, without limitation, interest on Advances to the extent not otherwise paid or reimbursed by the borrower (including indirect reimbursement from Penalty Charges or otherwise) with respect to such Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable), but excluding (1) Special Servicing Fees, Workout Fees and Liquidation Fees and (2) Borrower Delayed Reimbursements) outstanding or previously incurred on behalf of the Issuing Entity with respect to the related Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) and reimbursed from such Modification Fees (which additional expenses will be reimbursed from such Modification Fees) and (B) expenses previously paid or reimbursed from Modification Fees as described in the preceding clause (A), which expenses have been recovered from the related borrower as Penalty Charges, specific reimbursements or otherwise. All Excess Modification Fees earned by the Special Servicer will be required to offset any future Workout Fees or Liquidation Fees payable with respect to the related Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) or REO Property; provided, that if the Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) ceases being a Corrected Loan, and is subject to a subsequent modification, any Excess Modification Fees earned by the Special Servicer prior to such Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) ceasing to be a Corrected Loan will no longer be offset against future Liquidation Fees and Workout Fees unless such Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) ceased to be a Corrected Loan within 18 months of it becoming a modified Mortgage Loan (or a modified Loan Combination, if applicable). In such case, the Special Servicer will be entitled to a Liquidation Fee or Workout Fee (to the extent not previously offset) with respect to the new modification, waiver, extension or amendment or future liquidation of the Specially Serviced Loan or related REO Property (including in connection with a repurchase, sale, refinance, discounted or final payoff or other liquidation); provided that any Excess Modification Fees earned and paid to the Special Servicer in connection with such subsequent modification, waiver, extension or amendment will be applied to offset such Liquidation Fee or Workout Fee to the extent described above. Within any prior 12-month period, all Excess Modification Fees earned by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer (after taking into account any offset described above applied during such 12-month period) with respect to any Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) will be subject to a cap equal to the greater of (i) 1% of the outstanding principal balance of such Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) after giving effect to such transaction and (ii) $25,000.

S-232

“Borrower Delayed Reimbursements” means any unpaid or unreimbursed additional expenses (including, without limitation, Advances and interest on Advances) that the related borrower is required pursuant to a written modification agreement to pay in the future to the Issuing Entity in its capacity as owner of the related Mortgage Loan.

“Modification Fees” means, with respect to any Serviced Loan, any and all fees collected from the related borrower with respect to a modification, extension, waiver or amendment that modifies, extends, amends or waives any term of the Serviced Loan documents (as evidenced by a signed writing) agreed to by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer (other than all Assumption Fees, assumption application fees, Consent Fees and defeasance fees).

“Penalty Charges” means, with respect to any Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) (or successor REO Mortgage Loan or successor REO Companion Loan), any amounts actually collected thereon from the borrower that represent default charges, penalty charges, late fees and default interest (in the case of any Split Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan, to the extent allocable thereto pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement, and, in the case of a Serviced Companion Loan, to the extent not payable to the Serviced Companion Loan Holder, and, in the case of an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, to the extent remitted by the Outside Servicer to the Master Servicer).

“Ancillary Fees” means, with respect to any Serviced Loan, any and all demand fees, beneficiary statement charges, fees for insufficient or returned checks and other usual and customary charges and fees (other than Modification Fees, Consent Fees, Penalty Charges, defeasance fees, Assumption Fees and assumption application fees) actually received from the borrower.

“Excess Penalty Charges” means, with respect to any Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) and any Collection Period, the sum of (A) the excess of (i) any and all Penalty Charges collected in respect of such Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) during such Collection Period, over (ii) all unpaid or unreimbursed Advances and additional expenses of the Issuing Entity (including without limitation Advances and interest on Advances to the extent not otherwise paid or reimbursed by the borrower, but excluding Special Servicing Fees, Workout Fees and Liquidation Fees) outstanding or previously incurred on behalf of the Issuing Entity (and, if applicable, the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder) with respect to any Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) and reimbursed from such Penalty Charges (which Advances and additional expenses will be reimbursed from such Penalty Charges) and (B) Advances and expenses previously paid or reimbursed from Penalty Charges as described in the preceding clause (A), which Advances and expenses have been recovered from the related borrower or otherwise.

“Assumption Fees” means, with respect to any Serviced Loan, any and all assumption fees with respect to a transfer of a related Mortgaged Property or interests in a related borrower (excluding assumption application fees).

An Outside Servicer will be entitled to receive servicing compensation with respect to the related Outside Serviced Loan Combination pursuant to the terms of the Outside Servicing Agreement, which servicing compensation will be similar, but not necessarily identical, to that payable to the Master Servicer with respect to a Serviced Loan Combination under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (except that the applicable primary servicing fee rate under the related Outside Servicing Agreement for (i) The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan will be 0.0025% per annum, and (ii) the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan will be 0.01% per annum, and in each case such applicable primary servicing fee rate is included in the related Servicing Fee Rate presented in this prospectus supplement.

Special Servicing Compensation. The principal compensation to be paid to the Special Servicer in respect of its special servicing activities will be the Special Servicing Fee, the Workout Fee and the Liquidation Fee.

The “Special Servicing Fee” will accrue with respect to each Specially Serviced Loan and REO Property serviced and administered under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement at the applicable Special Servicing Fee Rate calculated on the basis of the Stated Principal Balance of the related Specially Serviced Loan on the same basis as interest is calculated on the related Specially Serviced Loan and will be prorated for partial periods, and will be payable monthly from general collections on all the Mortgage Loans and any REO Properties.

S-233

“Special Servicing Fee Rate” means (a) 0.25% per annum or (b) if such rate in clause (a) would result in a Special Servicing Fee with respect to a Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property serviced and administered under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, that would be less than $3,500 in any given month, then the Special Servicing Fee Rate for such month for such Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property will be such higher per annum rate as would result in a Special Servicing Fee equal to $3,500 for such month with respect to such Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property.

The “Workout Fee” will generally be payable with respect to each Corrected Loan serviced and administered under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and will be calculated by application of the applicable Workout Fee Rate to each collection of interest (excluding default interest and Excess Interest) and principal received on that Corrected Loan, for so long as it remains a Corrected Loan; provided that no Workout Fee will be payable by the Issuing Entity with respect to any such Corrected Loan if and to the extent that the Corrected Loan became a Specially Serviced Loan under clause (g) of the definition of Specially Serviced Loan (and no other clause of that definition) and no event of default actually occurs, unless the Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) is modified by the Special Servicer in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; provided, further, that if a Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) becomes a Specially Serviced Loan under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement only because of an event described in clause (a) of the definition of Specially Serviced Loan and the related collection of interest and principal is received within 90 days following the related maturity date in connection with the full and final payoff or refinancing of the related Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable), the Special Servicer will not be entitled to collect a Workout Fee, but may collect and retain appropriate fees from the related borrower in connection with such workout. The Workout Fee with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan that becomes a Corrected Loan under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will be reduced by any Excess Modification Fees paid by or on behalf of the related borrower with respect to such Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) as described in the definition of Excess Modification Fees, but only to the extent those fees have not previously been deducted from a Workout Fee or Liquidation Fee.

The Workout Fee with respect to any Corrected Loan serviced and administered under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, will cease to be payable if the Corrected Loan again becomes a Specially Serviced Loan but will become payable again if and when the Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) again becomes a Corrected Loan.

The “Workout Fee Rate” under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will be a rate equal to the lesser of (a) 1.0% and (b) such lower rate as would result in a workout fee of $1,000,000 when applied to each expected payment of principal and interest (other than default interest and Excess Interest) on the subject Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) from the date such Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) becomes a Corrected Loan, through and including the then-related maturity date; provided that, if the rate in clause (a) above would result in a Workout Fee that would be less than $25,000 when applied to each expected payment of principal and interest (other than default interest and Excess Interest) on the subject Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) from the date such Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) becomes a Corrected Loan through and including the then-related maturity date, then the Workout Fee Rate will be a rate equal to such higher rate as would result in a Workout Fee equal to $25,000 when applied to each expected payment of principal and interest (other than default interest and Excess Interest) on such Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) from the date such Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) becomes a Corrected Loan through and including the then-related maturity date.

If the Special Servicer resigns or is terminated other than for cause, it will receive any Workout Fees payable on the Serviced Mortgage Loans (or Serviced Loan Combinations, if applicable) that were Corrected Loans at the time of the resignation or termination or for which the resigning or terminated Special Servicer had cured the event of default through a modification, restructuring or workout negotiated by the Special Servicer and evidenced by a signed writing, but which had not as of the time the Special Servicer resigned or was terminated become a Corrected Loan solely because the borrower had not had sufficient time to make three consecutive full and timely Monthly Payments and which subsequently becomes a Corrected Loan as a result of the borrower making such three consecutive timely Monthly Payments, but such fee will cease to be payable in each case if the Corrected Loan again becomes a Specially Serviced Loan. The successor Special Servicer will not be entitled to any portion of those Workout Fees.

S-234

A “Liquidation Fee” will be payable with respect to each Specially Serviced Loan serviced and administered under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, as to which the Special Servicer obtains a full or discounted payoff (or unscheduled partial payment to the extent such prepayment is required by the Special Servicer as a condition to a workout) from the related borrower and, except as otherwise described below, with respect to any Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) repurchased or substituted for, or with respect to which a Loss of Value Payment is made, by a Sponsor, and with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan or any REO Property serviced and administered under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, as to which the Special Servicer receives any Liquidation Proceeds, insurance proceeds or condemnation proceeds. The Liquidation Fee for each such Serviced Mortgage Loan, Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property serviced and administered under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, will be payable from, and will be calculated by application of the Liquidation Fee Rate, to the related payment or proceeds; provided, that the Liquidation Fee with respect to any such Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property will be reduced by the amount of any Excess Modification Fees paid by or on behalf of the related borrower with respect to the Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property as described in the definition of “Excess Modification Fees” but only to the extent those fees have not previously been deducted from a Workout Fee or Liquidation Fee; provided, further, that if a Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) becomes a Specially Serviced Loan under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement only because of an event described in clause (a) of the definition of Specially Serviced Loan and the related proceeds are received within 90 days following the related maturity date in connection with the full and final payoff or refinancing of the related Serviced Mortgage Loan or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable, the Special Servicer will not be entitled to collect a Liquidation Fee, but may collect and retain appropriate fees from the related borrower in connection with such liquidation; provided, however, that, except as contemplated by each of the immediately preceding provisos and the second following paragraph, no Liquidation Fee will be less than $25,000.

The “Liquidation Fee Rate” under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will be a rate equal to the lesser of (a) such rate as would result in a Liquidation Fee of $1,000,000 and (b) 1.0%.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary described above, no Liquidation Fee will be payable based upon, or out of, Liquidation Proceeds received in connection with: (i) the repurchase of, or substitution for, or payment of any Loss of Value Payment with respect to, any Mortgage Loan by the applicable Sponsor for a Material Document Defect or Material Breach, as applicable, within 120 days of the discovery or receipt of notice by the Sponsor of the Material Document Defect or Material Breach, as applicable, that gave rise to the particular repurchase or substitution obligation or the making of the particular Loss of Value Payment, (ii) the purchase of any Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property by a mezzanine loan holder, if any (based on a purchase option set forth under the related intercreditor agreement), or the holder of a Subordinate Companion Loan, if any (based on a purchase option set forth under the related Co-Lender Agreement), in each case within 90 days of the date that the first purchase option related to the subject Servicing Transfer Event first becomes exercisable; or (iii) the purchase or other acquisition of all of the Mortgage Loans and REO Properties (or the Issuing Entity’s interest therein) in connection with an optional termination of the Issuing Entity. The Special Servicer may not receive a Workout Fee and a Liquidation Fee with respect to the same proceeds collected on a Mortgage Loan.

“Liquidation Proceeds” means the amount (other than insurance proceeds and Condemnation Proceeds) received in connection with a liquidation of a Mortgage Loan, Serviced Companion Loan, Mortgaged Property, REO Property or interest in a Mortgage Loan, Serviced Companion Loan, Mortgaged Property or REO Property.

“Defaulted Mortgage Loan” means a Serviced Loan (i) that is delinquent at least 60 days in respect of its Monthly Payments or delinquent in respect of its balloon payment, if any, in either case such delinquency to be determined without giving effect to any grace period permitted by the related Mortgage or Mortgage Note and without regard to any acceleration of payments under the related Mortgage and Mortgage Note or (ii) as to which the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer has, by written notice to the related borrower, accelerated the maturity of the indebtedness evidenced by the related Mortgage Note.

The Special Servicer will also be entitled to retain, as additional servicing compensation: (a) a specified percentage (which may be either 0% or 50% for performing Serviced Loans, and 100% for Specially Serviced Loans) of Excess Modification Fees, Excess Penalty Charges, Consent Fees, Ancillary Fees (other than fees for insufficient or returned checks), extension fees and Assumption Fees with respect to each Serviced Loan; (b) 100% of any assumption application fees with respect to Specially Serviced Loans; and (c) any interest or other income earned on deposits in the REO Accounts.

S-235

Although the Special Servicer is required to service and administer the Serviced Loans in accordance with the Servicing Standard and, accordingly, without regard to its rights to receive compensation under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, additional servicing compensation in the nature of assumption and modification fees may under certain circumstances provide the Special Servicer with an economic disincentive to comply with this standard.

With respect to each Collection Period, the Special Servicer will be required to deliver or cause to be delivered to the Certificate Administrator, without charge and within two business days following the related Determination Date, a report that discloses and contains an itemized listing of any Disclosable Special Servicer Fees received by the Special Servicer or any of its affiliates during the related Collection Period, provided that no such report will be due in any month during which no Disclosable Special Servicer Fees were received.

The Special Servicer and its affiliates will be prohibited from receiving or retaining any compensation or any other remuneration (including, without limitation, in the form of commissions, brokerage fees or rebates) from any person or entity (including, without limitation, the Issuing Entity, any borrower, any property manager, any guarantor or indemnitor in respect of a Serviced Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan and any purchaser of any Serviced Mortgage Loan, Serviced Companion Loan or REO Property) in connection with the disposition, workout or foreclosure of any Serviced Loan, the management or disposition of any REO Property, or the performance of any other special servicing duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, other than as expressly provided for in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; provided, that such prohibition will not apply to the Permitted Special Servicer/Affiliate Fees or the fees received by any person acting as an Outside Servicer or an Outside Special Servicer as expressly provided for under the Outside Servicing Agreement, or as master servicer or special servicer as expressly provided for under the pooling and servicing agreement governing the securitization of a Serviced Companion Loan.

“Disclosable Special Servicer Fees” means, with respect to any Serviced Loan or related REO Property, any compensation and other remuneration (including, without limitation, in the form of commissions, brokerage fees and rebates received or retained by the Special Servicer or any of its affiliates that is paid by any person or entity (including, without limitation, the Issuing Entity, any borrower, any property manager, any guarantor or indemnitor in respect of a Serviced Loan and any purchaser of any Serviced Loan or REO Property (or interest in an REO Property related to any Serviced Loan Combinations, if applicable)) in connection with the disposition, workout or foreclosure of any Serviced Loan, the management or disposition of any REO Property, and the performance by the Special Servicer or any such affiliate of any other special servicing duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, other than (1) any compensation which is payable to the Special Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and (2) to the extent included in a CREFC® Report for the applicable period, any Permitted Special Servicer/Affiliate Fees.

“Permitted Special Servicer/Affiliate Fees” means any commercially reasonable treasury management fees, banking fees, title insurance and/or other insurance commissions and fees, title agency fees, and appraisal review fees received or retained by the Special Servicer or any of its affiliates in connection with any services performed by such party with respect to any Serviced Loan or REO Property, in each case, in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

An Outside Special Servicer will be entitled to receive special servicing compensation with respect to the related Outside Serviced Loan Combination pursuant to the terms of the Outside Servicing Agreement, which special servicing compensation will be similar, but not necessarily identical, to that payable to the Special Servicer with respect to a Serviced Loan Combination under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

Operating Advisor Compensation. An operating advisor fee (the “Operating Advisor Fee”) will be payable to the Operating Advisor monthly from amounts received in respect of the Mortgage Loans (including any Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan) and will accrue at the applicable Operating Advisor Fee Rate with respect to each Mortgage Loan (including any Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan) on the Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage Loan and will be calculated on the same interest accrual basis as the related Mortgage Loan and prorated for any partial periods.

The “Operating Advisor Fee Rate” with respect to each Interest Accrual Period is a rate equal to 0.00165% per annum.

S-236

The Operating Advisor Fee will be payable from funds on deposit in the Collection Account out of amounts otherwise available to make distributions on the Certificates as described in “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Withdrawals from the Collection Account” in this prospectus supplement.

Fees and Expenses. The amounts available for distribution on the Certificates on any Distribution Date will generally be net of the following amounts:

Type/Recipient	Amount(1)		Frequency	Source of Funds
Servicing Fee(2) and Sub-Servicing Fee / Master Servicer / Outside Servicer	with respect to each Mortgage Loan (including an REO Mortgage Loan and including an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan), will accrue on the related Stated Principal Balance at a rate (which rate includes any sub-servicing fee rate and the primary servicing fee rate payable to the Outside Servicer with respect to an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan), which together with the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate, the Trustee/Certificate Administrator Fee Rate and the Operating Advisor Fee Rate, is equal to the per annum rate set forth on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as the Administrative Fee Rate with respect to such Mortgage Loan (calculated on the same basis as interest is calculated on the related Mortgage Loan and prorated for partial periods)		monthly	interest collections
Additional Servicing Compensation(3) / Master Servicer	–	a specified percentage (which may be either 50% or 100% for performing Serviced Loans, and 0% for Specially Serviced Loans) of Excess Modification Fees, Excess Penalty Charges, Consent Fees, Ancillary Fees (other than fees for insufficient or returned checks), extension fees and Assumption Fees with respect to the Serviced Mortgage Loans(4)	from time to time	the related fee/ investment income
	–	100% of assumption application fees on the Serviced Mortgage Loans that are not Specially Serviced Loans and any fee actually paid by a borrower in connection with the defeasance of a Serviced Mortgage Loan	from time to time
	–	100% of fees for insufficient or returned checks actually received from borrowers on all Serviced Loans	from time to time
	–	all investment income earned on amounts on deposit in the collection account and certain reserve accounts	monthly
Special Servicing Fee(5) / Special Servicer	with respect to any Serviced Mortgage Loan that is a Specially Serviced Loan or REO Mortgage Loan, will accrue at a rate equal to (a) 0.25% per annum or (b) if such rate in clause (a) would result in a Special Servicing Fee with respect to such Specially Serviced Mortgage Loan that would be less than $3,500 in any given month, then the Special Servicing Fee Rate for such month for such Specially Serviced Mortgage Loan will be such higher per annum rate as would result in a Special Servicing Fee equal to $3,500 for such month with respect to such Mortgage Loan (in each case, calculated on the related Stated Principal Balance and same basis as interest is calculated on the related Mortgage Loan and prorated for partial periods)		monthly	general collections

S-237

Type/Recipient	Amount(1)		Frequency	Source of Funds
Workout Fee(6) / Special Servicer	with some limited exceptions, an amount equal to the Workout Fee Rate applied to each payment or other collection of principal and interest (excluding default interest and Excess Interest) on any Serviced Mortgage Loan that became a Corrected Loan under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which Workout Fee Rate will equal the lesser of (a) 1.0% and (b) such lower rate as would result in a Workout Fee of $1,000,000, when applied to each expected payment of principal and interest (excluding default interest and Excess Interest) with respect to the subject Serviced Mortgage Loan from the date such Mortgage Loan becomes a Corrected Loan, through and including the then-related maturity date; provided that, if the rate in clause (a) above would result in a Workout Fee that would be less than $25,000 when applied to each expected payment of principal and interest (excluding default interest and Excess Interest) on any Serviced Mortgage Loan from the date such Mortgage Loan becomes a Corrected Loan through and including the then-related maturity date, then the Workout Fee Rate will be a rate equal to such higher rate as would result in a Workout Fee equal to $25,000 when applied to each expected payment of principal and interest (excluding default interest and Excess Interest) on such Mortgage Loan from the date such Mortgage Loan becomes a Corrected Loan through and including the then-related maturity date); and provided, further, that no Workout Fee will be payable to the Special Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement with respect to any Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan.		monthly	the related collections of principal and interest
Liquidation Fee(7) / Special Servicer	with some limited exceptions, an amount generally equal to 1.0% of each recovery by the Special Servicer of Liquidation Proceeds, insurance proceeds, condemnation proceeds and/or other payments, with respect to each Serviced Mortgage Loan repurchased or substituted by a Sponsor, each Specially Serviced Loan and each REO Property; provided, however, that, the Liquidation Fee payable under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement with respect to any such Mortgage Loan will generally not be more than $1,000,000 or, with limited exception, less than $25,000; and provided, further, that no Liquidation Fee will be payable to the Special Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement with respect to any Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan.		upon receipt of such proceeds and payments	the related Liquidation Proceeds, insurance proceeds, condemnation proceeds and borrower payments
Additional Special Servicing Compensation(3) / Special Servicer	–	a specified percentage (which may be either 0% or 50% for performing Serviced Loans, and 100% for Specially Serviced Loans) of Excess Modification Fees, Excess Penalty Charges, Consent Fees, Ancillary Fees (other than fees for insufficient or returned checks), extension fees and Assumption Fees with respect to the Serviced Mortgage Loans	from time to time	the related fee/ investment income
	–	100% of assumption application fees on Specially Serviced Loans (other than any Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan)	from time to time
	–	all investment income received on funds in any REO account	from time to time

S-238

Type/Recipient	Amount(1)	Frequency	Source of Funds
Trustee/Certificate Administrator Fee / Trustee/Certificate Administrator	with respect to each Mortgage Loan (including an REO Mortgage Loan), will accrue at a per annum rate equal to 0.0046% on the Stated Principal Balance of the related Mortgage Loan (calculated on the same basis as interest is calculated on the related Mortgage Loan and prorated for partial periods)	monthly	general collections
Operating Advisor Fee / Operating Advisor	with respect to each Mortgage Loan (including an REO Mortgage Loan), will accrue at a per annum rate equal to 0.00165% on the Stated Principal Balance of the related Mortgage Loan (calculated on the same basis as interest is calculated on the related Mortgage Loan and prorated for any partial periods)	monthly	general collections
Property Advances(8) / Master Servicer, Special Servicer and Trustee	to the extent of funds available, the amount of any Property Advances	from time to time	collections on the related loan, then default interest/late payment fees collected on any loan, or if not recoverable or in the case of Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amounts, from general collections
Interest on Property Advances(8) / Master Servicer, Special Servicer and Trustee	at Prime Rate	when advance is reimbursed	first from default interest/late payment fees and modification fees collected on the related loan, then default interest/late payment fees collected on any loan, then from general collections
P&I Advances / Master Servicer and Trustee	to the extent of funds available, the amount of any P&I Advances	from time to time	collections on the related loan, then default interest/late payment fees collected on any loan, or if not recoverable or in the case of Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amounts, from general collections
Interest on P&I Advances / Master Servicer and Trustee	at Prime Rate	when advance is reimbursed	first from default interest/late payment fees and modification fees collected on the related loan, then default interest/late payment fees collected on any loan, then from general collections

S-239

Type/Recipient	Amount(1)	Frequency	Source of Funds
Indemnification Expenses(8) / Depositor, Certificate Administrator, paying agent, custodian, Certificate Registrar, Trustee, Operating Advisor, Master Servicer and Special Servicer	amounts and expenses for which the Depositor, the Certificate Administrator, the paying agent, the custodian, the Certificate Registrar, the Trustee, the Operating Advisor, the Master Servicer (for itself or on behalf of certain indemnified sub-servicers) and the Special Servicer are entitled to indemnification.	from time to time	general collections

(1) The above chart generally does not include amounts payable to the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, any Outside Servicer, or any Outside Special Servicer with respect to the Companion Loans.

(2) With respect to the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans, the related Other Master Servicer (or primary servicer) will be entitled to a primary servicing fee accruing at a rate equal to (a) 0.0025% per annum, with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan and (b) 0.01% per annum with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan.

(3) In general, with respect to each Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, we anticipate that the related Other Master Servicer and/or Other Special Servicer, as applicable, will be entitled to receive fees with respect to such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan in amounts, from sources and at frequencies that are similar, but not necessarily identical, to those described in the table. The rights to compensation for such parties will be governed by the applicable Outside Servicing Agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Certain Considerations Regarding the Outside Serviced Loan Combinations” and “—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.

(4) Allocable between the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer as provided in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and as described in “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Withdrawals from the Collection Account” in this prospectus supplement. The allocations between each Other Master Servicer and each Other Special Servicer pursuant to the related Outside Servicing Agreement may be different.

(5) With respect to the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans, the related Other Special Servicer will be entitled to a special servicing fee accruing at a rate equal to (a) with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan, the greater of 0.25% per annum or such rate as would result in a special servicing fee of $3,500 for the related month and (b) with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan, the greater of 0.25% per annum or such rate as would result in a special servicing fee of $1,000 for the related month.

(6) With respect to the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans, the related Other Special Servicer will be entitled to a workout fee accruing at a rate equal to (a) with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan, the lesser of 1.0% and such rate as would result in a workout fee of $1,000,000, provided that no workout fee will be less than $25,000 and (b) with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan, the lesser of 1.0% and such rate as would result in a workout fee of $1,000,000, provided that no workout fee will be less than $25,000.

(7) With respect to the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans, the related Other Special Servicer will be entitled to a liquidation fee accruing at a rate equal to (a) with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan, the lesser of 1.0% and such rate as would result in a liquidation fee of $1,000,000, provided that, except as provided under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, no liquidation fee will be less than $25,000 and (b) with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan, the lesser of 1.0% and such rate as would result in a workout fee of $1,000,000, provided that no workout fee will be less than $25,000.

(8) In general, with respect to each Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, we anticipate that the related Other Master Servicer, Other Special Servicer, Other Operating Advisor (if any), Other Certificate Administrator and Other Trustee will be entitled to receive reimbursement and/or indemnification with respect to such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan in amounts, from sources and at frequencies that are similar, but not necessarily identical, to those described in the table. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Certain Considerations Regarding the Outside Serviced Loan Combinations” and “—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.

Certain Affiliations and Certain Relationships

Transaction Party and Related Party Affiliations:

The Depositor and its affiliates are playing several roles in this transaction. The Depositor is an affiliate of CGMRC, a Sponsor and an Originator, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., one of the underwriters, and Citibank, the Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar and paying agent. In addition, Citibank is the certificate administrator under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

GSMC, a Sponsor and an Originator, GS CRE, an Originator, and Goldman Sachs & Co., one of the underwriters, are affiliated with each other.

Wells Fargo, the Master Servicer, is also the master servicer and custodian under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which governs the servicing of The Decoration & Design Building Loan

S-240

Combination, and the general master servicer, certificate administrator, tax administrator and custodian under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which governs the servicing of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination.

LNR Partners, the Special Servicer, is also the special servicer under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which governs the servicing of The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination. LNR Partners is also affiliated with LNR Securities Holdings, LLC, which entity, or an affiliate thereof, is expected to own a majority of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H Certificates issued in connection with this transaction and appoint itself, or an affiliate thereof, as the Controlling Class Representative.

DBTCA, the Trustee, is also the trustee under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which governs the servicing of The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination. In its capacity as the CGCMT 2015-P1 Trustee, DBTCA serves as mortgagee of record with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination.

Warehouse Financing Arrangements:

Citibank, the Certificate Administrator and an affiliate of the Depositor and of CGMRC, provides warehouse financing to an affiliate of KGS through a repurchase facility. Five (5) of the KGS Mortgage Loans, with an aggregate principal balance of approximately $32,105,560 as of the Cut-off Date and representing approximately 3.3% of the Initial Pool Balance, are subject to that repurchase facility. Proceeds received by KGS in connection with the sale of the KGS Mortgage Loans to the Depositor will be applied, among other things, to reacquire the financed KGS Mortgage Loans and make payments to Citibank, as the repurchase agreement counterparty.

Citibank, the Certificate Administrator and an affiliate of the Depositor and of CGMRC, provides warehouse financing to an affiliate of RAIT through a repurchase facility. Three (3) of the Mortgage Loans that RAIT will transfer to the Depositor, with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of approximately $27,838,749 as of the Cut-off Date and representing approximately 2.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, are subject to that repurchase facility. Proceeds received by RAIT in connection with the contribution of such Mortgage Loans to this securitization transaction will be applied, among other things, to reacquire such financed Mortgage Loans and make payments to Citibank, as the repurchase agreement counterparty.

Goldman Sachs Bank USA, an affiliate of GSMC, provides warehouse financing to an affiliate of Rialto through a repurchase facility. Fifteen (15) of the Mortgage Loans that Rialto will transfer to the Depositor, with an aggregate principal balance of approximately $133,008,907 as of the Cut-off Date and representing approximately 13.9% of the Initial Pool Balance, are subject to that repurchase facility. Proceeds received by Rialto in connection with the contribution of Mortgage Loans to this securitization transaction will be applied, among other things, to reacquire the financed Mortgage Loans and make payments to Goldman Sachs Bank USA as the repurchase agreement counterparty.

Wells Fargo, which is the Master Servicer, provides warehouse financing to an affiliate of Rialto through a repurchase facility. The Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan that Rialto will transfer to the Depositor, with an aggregate principal balance of approximately $36,500,000 as of the Cut-off Date and representing approximately 3.8% of the Initial Pool Balance, is subject to that repurchase facility. Proceeds received by Rialto in connection with the contribution of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan to this securitization transaction will be applied, among other things, to reacquire the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan and make payments to Wells Fargo as the repurchase agreement counterparty.

S-241

Interim Servicing Arrangements:

Pursuant to certain interim servicing agreements between Wells Fargo, which is the Master Servicer, and each of the entities indicated below, Wells Fargo acts as interim servicer with respect to:

· certain of the Mortgage Loans (with an aggregate principal balance of approximately $344,150,654 as of the Cut-off Date and representing approximately 35.9% of the Initial Pool Balance) to be contributed to this securitization transaction by CGMRC, a Sponsor and an Originator, as well as other mortgage loans owned by CGMRC;

· certain of the Mortgage Loans (with an aggregate principal balance of approximately $142,670,884 as of the Cut-off Date and representing approximately 14.9% of the Initial Pool Balance) to be contributed to this securitization transaction by Rialto, a Sponsor and an Originator, as well as other mortgage loans owned by Rialto; and

· certain of the Mortgage Loans (with an aggregate principal balance of approximately $23,955,560 as of the Cut-off Date and representing approximately 2.5% of the Initial Pool Balance) to be contributed to this securitization transaction by KGS, a Sponsor and an Originator, as well as other mortgage loans owned by KGS.

Interim and Other Custodial Arrangements:

Wells Fargo, which is the Master Servicer, is also acting as the interim custodian of the loan files for certain of the Mortgage Loans to be contributed to this securitization transaction by CGMRC. However, in the case of The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo is holding the related Mortgage Loan documents (other than the promissory note for The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan) in its capacity as custodian for the CGCMT 2015-P1 Securitization.

Wells Fargo, which is the Master Servicer, is also acting as the interim custodian of the loan files for all of the Mortgage Loans to be contributed to this securitization transaction by GSMC, Rialto, KGS and RAIT. However, in the case of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo is holding the related Mortgage Loan documents (other than the promissory note for the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan) in its capacity as custodian for the WFCM 2015-C30 Securitization.

Loan Combination and Mezzanine Loan Arrangements:

CGMRC, an Originator and a Sponsor, or an affiliate thereof will, as of the date of initial issuance of the Offered Certificates, hold the Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion Loans, but is expected to transfer each such Companion Loan to one or more future commercial mortgage securitization transactions.

GSMC, an Originator and a Sponsor, or an affiliate thereof will, as of the date of initial issuance of the Offered Certificates, hold the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu Companion Loans, but is expected to transfer each such Companion Loan to one or more future commercial mortgage securitization transactions.

Rialto, an Originator and a Sponsor, is the current holder of the Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu Companion Loans evidenced by the non-controlling notes A-1-2 and A-2-2, but is expected to transfer each such Companion Loan to one or more future commercial mortgage securitization transactions.

RMezz Greylyn BP, LLC, an affiliate of Rialto, an Originator and a Sponsor, is the current holder of a mezzanine loan in the original principal amount of $5,375,000 related to the Mortgage Loan secured by the Mortgaged Property identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Greylyn Business Park, representing approximately 3.7% of the Initial Pool Balance. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage Loans—Additional Indebtedness” in this prospectus supplement. In exercising its rights, the mezzanine lender has no obligation to consider the interests of, or the impact of the exercise of such rights upon, the Issuing Entity or the Certificateholders.

S-242

Other Arrangements:

The Master Servicer will enter into one or more agreements with the Sponsors to purchase the master servicing rights to the Mortgage Loans and/or the right to be appointed as the master servicer with respect to such Mortgage Loans and to purchase the primary servicing rights to certain of the Serviced Loans.

SH assisted GSMC, Rialto, KGS and RAIT with the preparation of certain due diligence materials for certain Mortgage Loans contributed by each such Sponsor to the Mortgage Pool.

These roles and other potential relationships may give rise to conflicts of interest as further described under “Risk Factors—Interests and Incentives of the Originators, the Sponsors and Their Affiliates May Not Be Aligned with Your Interests” and “—Other Potential Conflicts of Interest May Affect Your Investment” in this prospectus supplement.

S-243

DESCRIPTION OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES

General

The Certificates will be issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and will consist of 17 classes (each, a “Class”), to be designated as the Class A-1 Certificates, the Class A-2 Certificates, the Class A-3 Certificates, the Class A-4 Certificates, the Class A-AB Certificates, the Class X-A Certificates, the Class A-S Certificates, the Class B Certificates, the Class PEZ Certificates, the Class C Certificates, the Class D Certificates, the Class X-D Certificates, the Class E Certificates, the Class F Certificates, the Class G Certificates, the Class H Certificates and the Class R Certificates (collectively, the “Certificates”). Only the Class A-1 Certificates, the Class A-2 Certificates, the Class A-3 Certificates, the Class A-4 Certificates, the Class A-AB Certificates, the Class X-A Certificates, the Class A-S Certificates, the Class B Certificates, the Class PEZ Certificates, the Class C Certificates, the Class D Certificates and the Class X-D Certificates (collectively, the “Offered Certificates”) are offered by this prospectus supplement. The Class X-A Certificates and the Class X-D Certificates are referred to as the “Class X Certificates” in this prospectus supplement. The Class A-S Certificates, the Class B Certificates, the Class PEZ Certificates and the Class C Certificates are referred to as the “Exchangeable Certificates” in this prospectus supplement. The Certificates other than the Exchangeable Certificates and the Class R Certificates are referred to as the “Regular Certificates” in this prospectus supplement. The Offered Certificates that also constitute Regular Certificates are referred to as the “Offered Regular Certificates” in this prospectus supplement. The Class E Certificates, the Class F Certificates, the Class G Certificates, the Class H Certificates and the Class R Certificates are not offered by this prospectus supplement.

The Certificates represent in the aggregate the entire beneficial ownership interest in the Issuing Entity consisting of: (i) the Mortgage Loans and all payments under and proceeds of the Mortgage Loans due after the Cut-off Date, (ii) any Mortgaged Property acquired on behalf of the Issuing Entity (including, in the case of an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, pursuant to the Outside Servicing Agreement) through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure (upon acquisition, each, an “REO Property”), but in the case of each Loan Combination, only to the extent of the Issuing Entity’s interest in any related REO Property, (iii) all of the Trustee’s rights in any reserve account or lock-box account (to the extent of the Issuing Entity’s interest in such reserve account or lock-box account) and such funds or assets as from time to time are deposited in the Collection Account, the Lower-Tier Distribution Account, the Upper-Tier Distribution Account, the Interest Reserve Account, the Excess Interest Distribution Account, the Excess Liquidation Proceeds Reserve Account, the Exchangeable Distribution Account and any account established in connection with REO Properties (an “REO Account”), (iv) the Trustee’s rights in any assignment of leases, rents and profits and any security agreement, indemnity or guarantee given as additional security for the Mortgage Loans, (v) the Master Servicer’s and the Trustee’s rights under all insurance policies with respect to the Mortgage Loans and (vi) the Trustee’s rights under any environmental indemnity agreements relating to the Mortgaged Properties. The Certificates do not represent an interest in or obligation of the Depositor, the Sponsors, the Originators, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the underwriters, the borrowers, the property managers or any of their respective affiliates.

S-244

Upon initial issuance, the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB, Class A-S, Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H Certificates (collectively, the “Sequential Pay Certificates”) and the Class PEZ Certificates (collectively with the Sequential Pay Certificates, the “Principal Balance Certificates”) will have the respective Certificate Principal Amounts (or, in the case of the respective Classes of Exchangeable Certificates, the maximum Certificate Principal Amounts), and the Class X-A and Class X-D Certificates will have the respective Notional Amounts, shown below (in each case, subject to a variance of plus or minus 5%):

Class	Initial Certificate Principal Amount or Notional Amount
Class A-1	$31,785,000
Class A-2	$15,217,000
Class A-3	$220,000,000
Class A-4	$331,456,000
Class A-AB	$72,484,000
Class X-A	$718,866,000
Class A-S(1)(2)(3)	$47,924,000
Class B(1)(2)(3)	$62,302,000
Class PEZ(1)(2)(3)	$152,160,000
Class C(1)(2)(3)	$41,934,000
Class D	$56,311,000
Class X-D	$56,311,000
Class E	$23,963,000
Class F	$9,584,000
Class G	$11,129,000
Class H	$34,400,233

(1) The Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates may be exchanged for Class PEZ Certificates, and Class PEZ Certificates may be exchanged for the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates.

(2) On the Closing Date, the Issuing Entity will issue the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Trust Components, which will have outstanding principal balances, subject to a variance of plus or minus 5%, of $47,924,000, $62,302,000 and $41,934,000, respectively. The Exchangeable Certificates will, at all times, represent undivided beneficial ownership interests in a grantor trust that will hold such Trust Components. Each Class of the Exchangeable Certificates will, at all times, represent a beneficial interest in a percentage of the outstanding principal balance of the Class A-S, Class B and/or Class C Trust Components. Following any exchange of Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates for Class PEZ Certificates or any exchange of Class PEZ Certificates for Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates, the percentage interests of the outstanding principal balances of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Trust Components that is represented by the Class A-S, Class B, Class PEZ and Class C Certificates will be increased or decreased accordingly.

(3) The initial Certificate Principal Amount of each Class of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates shown in the table on the cover page of this prospectus supplement, in the table above and on the back cover of this prospectus supplement represents the maximum Certificate Principal Amount of such Class without giving effect to any issuance of Class PEZ Certificates. The initial Certificate Principal Amount of the Class PEZ Certificates shown in the table on the cover page of this prospectus supplement, in the table above and on the back cover of this prospectus supplement is equal to the aggregate of the maximum initial Certificate Principal Amounts of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates, representing the maximum Certificate Principal Amount of the Class PEZ Certificates that could be issued in an exchange. The actual Certificate Principal Amount of any Class of Exchangeable Certificates issued on the Closing Date may be less than the maximum Certificate Principal Amount of that Class and may be zero. The Certificate Principal Amounts of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates to be issued on the Closing Date will be reduced, in required proportions, by an amount equal to the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class PEZ Certificates issued on the Closing Date. The initial Certificate Principal Amount of any Trust Component will equal the initial Certificate Principal Amount of the Class of Exchangeable Certificates having the same alphabetical designation as that Trust Component without regard to any exchange of such Certificates for Class PEZ Certificates. The aggregate Certificate Principal Amount of the Offered Certificates shown on the cover page and back cover of this prospectus supplement includes the maximum Certificate Principal Amount of Exchangeable Certificates that could be outstanding on the Closing Date equal to $152,160,000 (subject to a variance of plus or minus 5%).

The aggregate principal amount (the “Certificate Principal Amount”) of any Class of Principal Balance Certificates or Trust Component outstanding at any time represents the maximum amount that its holders (or, in the case of a Trust Component, the holders of Exchangeable Certificates evidencing an interest in that Trust Component) are entitled to receive at such time as distributions allocable to principal from the cash flow on the Mortgage Loans and the other assets in the Issuing Entity, all as described in this prospectus supplement. As discussed below, each Class of Exchangeable Certificates will only receive distributions of principal and interest that are distributable with respect to the percentage interests in the Class A-S, Class B and/or Class C Trust Components represented by such Class of Exchangeable Certificates. See “—Distributions” below. The Certificate Principal Amount of each Class of Principal Balance Certificates or Trust Component will in each case be reduced by amounts actually distributed to that Class or Trust Component that are allocable to principal and by any Realized Losses allocated to that Class or Trust Component and may be increased by recoveries of such

S-245

Realized Losses as described under “—Distributions—Realized Losses” below. In addition, amounts determined to constitute recoveries of Non-Recoverable Advances that were previously reimbursed out of collections of principal on the Mortgage Loans may result in increases to the Certificate Principal Amount of a Class of Sequential Pay Certificates or Trust Component, as and to the extent described under “—Distributions—Realized Losses” below. In the event that Realized Losses previously allocated to a Class of Sequential Pay Certificates (exclusive of the Exchangeable Certificates) or Trust Component (and, therefore, the applicable Exchangeable Certificates) in reduction of its Certificate Principal Amount are recovered subsequent to the reduction of the Certificate Principal Amount of such Class or Trust Component to zero, holders of such Class, or of Exchangeable Certificates evidencing an interest in such Trust Component, may receive distributions in respect of such recoveries in accordance with the priorities set forth below under “—Distributions—Payment Priorities” in this prospectus supplement.

The Class X Certificates will not have Certificate Principal Amounts. Each Class of Class X Certificates will represent in the aggregate the right to receive distributions of interest accrued as described in this prospectus supplement on its respective notional principal amount (each, a “Notional Amount”). The Notional Amount of the Class X-A Certificates will equal the sum of the Certificate Principal Amounts of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates and Class A-S Trust Component from time to time. The Notional Amount of the Class X-A Certificates will be reduced to the extent of all reductions in the Certificate Principal Amounts of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates and the Class A-S Trust Component. The Notional Amount of the Class X-D Certificates will equal the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class D Certificates from time to time. The Notional Amount of the Class X-D Certificates will be reduced to the extent of all reductions in the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class D Certificates.

“Class A-S Percentage Interest” means, the quotient of the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class A-S Certificates divided by the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class A-S Trust Component. As of the Closing Date, the Class A-S Percentage Interest will be 100%.

“Class A-S Trust Component” means an interest issued as a regular interest in the Upper-Tier REMIC with a Pass-Through Rate equal to the Pass-Through Rate of the Class A-S Certificates. The Class A-S Certificates will represent beneficial ownership of the Class A-S Percentage Interest of the Class A-S Trust Component, and the Class PEZ Certificates will represent beneficial ownership of, among other things, the Class A-S-PEZ Percentage Interest of the Class A-S Trust Component. The Class A-S Trust Component will be held in the Grantor Trust.

“Class A-S-PEZ Percentage Interest” means 100% minus the Class A-S Percentage Interest. As of the Closing Date, the Class A-S-PEZ Percentage Interest will be 0%.

“Class B Percentage Interest” means, the quotient of the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class B Certificates divided by the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class B Trust Component. As of the Closing Date, the Class B Percentage Interest will be 100%.

“Class B Trust Component” means an interest issued as a regular interest in the Upper-Tier REMIC with a Pass-Through Rate equal to the Pass-Through Rate of the Class B Certificates. The Class B Certificates will represent beneficial ownership of the Class B Percentage Interest of the Class B Trust Component, and the Class PEZ Certificates will represent beneficial ownership of, among other things, the Class B-PEZ Percentage Interest of the Class B Trust Component. The Class B Trust Component will be held in the Grantor Trust.

“Class B-PEZ Percentage Interest” means 100% minus the Class B Percentage Interest. As of the Closing Date, the Class B-PEZ Percentage Interest will be 0%.

“Class C Percentage Interest” means, the quotient of the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class C Certificates divided by the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class C Trust Component. As of the Closing Date, the Class C Percentage Interest will be 100%.

“Class C Trust Component” means an interest issued as a regular interest in the Upper-Tier REMIC with a Pass-Through Rate equal to the Pass-Through Rate of the Class C Certificates. The Class C Certificates will represent beneficial ownership of the Class C Percentage Interest of the Class C Trust Component, and the Class PEZ Certificates will represent beneficial ownership of, among other things, the Class C-PEZ Percentage Interest of the Class C Trust Component. The Class C Trust Component will be held in the Grantor Trust.

S-246

“Class C-PEZ Percentage Interest” means 100% minus the Class C Percentage Interest. As of the Closing Date, the Class C-PEZ Percentage Interest will be 0%.

“Class PEZ Component” means any of the Class PEZ Component A-S, Class PEZ Component B or Class PEZ Component C.

“Class PEZ Component A-S” means the portion of the Class A-S Trust Component equal to the Class A-S-PEZ Percentage Interest of the Class A-S Trust Component.

“Class PEZ Component B” means the portion of the Class B Trust Component equal to the Class B-PEZ Percentage Interest of the Class B Trust Component.

“Class PEZ Component C” means the portion of the Class C Trust Component equal to the Class C-PEZ Percentage Interest of the Class C Trust Component.

“Trust Component” means any of the Class A-S Trust Component, Class B Trust Component or Class C Trust Component.

Exchangeable Certificates

Exchanges

Groups of Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates may be exchanged for Class PEZ Certificates and vice versa, in whole or in part, as described more fully below. This process may occur repeatedly. However, exchanges will no longer be permitted following the date when the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class A-S Trust Component is (and, correspondingly, the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class A-S Certificates and the principal balance of the Class PEZ Component A-S are) reduced to zero as a result of the payment in full of all interest and principal on that Trust Component.

Following the Closing Date, Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates that collectively evidence a uniform Tranche Percentage Interest in each Trust Component (such Certificates in the aggregate, an “Exchangeable Proportion”) will be exchangeable on the books of DTC for Class PEZ Certificates that represent the same Tranche Percentage Interest in each Trust Component as the Certificates to be surrendered, and any Class PEZ Certificates will be exchangeable on the books of DTC for Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates that evidence the same Tranche Percentage Interest in each Trust Component as the Class PEZ Certificates to be surrendered. For these purposes, the “Tranche Percentage Interest” of any Certificate in relation to a Trust Component is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of (a) the Certificate Principal Amount of that Certificate (or, in the case of a Class PEZ Certificate, the portion of the principal amount of the Class PEZ Component with the same letter designation as that Trust Component evidenced by such Certificate) to (b) the Certificate Principal Amount of that Trust Component.

There will be no limitation on the number of exchanges authorized under the exchange provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. In all cases, however, an exchange may not occur if the face amount of the Certificates to be received in the exchange would not represent an authorized denomination for the relevant Class as described under “—Delivery, Form, Transfer and Denomination” below. In addition, the Depositor will have the right to make or cause exchanges on the Closing Date pursuant to instructions delivered to the Certificate Administrator on the Closing Date.

The various amounts distributable on the Class PEZ Certificates on each Distribution Date in respect of Interest Accrual Amounts, Interest Distribution Amounts, Interest Shortfalls, Principal Distribution Amounts, reimbursements of Realized Losses, yield maintenance charges and excess liquidation proceeds allocated to any of the respective aggregate Tranche Percentage Interests in the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Trust Components represented by the Class PEZ Certificates will be so distributed in a single, aggregate distribution to the holders of the Class PEZ Certificates on such Distribution Date. In addition, the Class PEZ Certificates will be allocated the aggregate amount of Realized Losses, Interest Shortfalls and other interest shortfalls (including those resulting from Appraisal Reduction Events) corresponding to the respective aggregate Tranche Percentage Interests in the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Trust Components represented by the Class PEZ Certificates. See “—Distributions” below.

S-247

For a discussion of the federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of the Exchangeable Certificates, see “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—Taxation of the Exchangeable Certificates” in this prospectus supplement.

Procedures and Fees

If a Certificateholder wishes to exchange Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates for Class PEZ Certificates, or Class PEZ Certificates for Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates, such Certificateholder must notify the Certificate Administrator by e-mail at ctssfexchanges@citi.com no later than 3 business days prior to the proposed date of such exchange (the “Exchange Date”). The Exchange Date can be any business day other than the first or last business day of the month. In addition, the Certificateholder must provide notice on the Certificateholder’s letterhead, which notice must carry a medallion stamp guarantee and set forth the following information: the CUSIP numbers of the Exchangeable Certificates to be exchanged and received, the original and outstanding Certificate Principal Amount of the Exchangeable Certificates to be exchanged and of the Exchangeable Certificates to be received, the Certificateholder’s DTC participant number and the proposed Exchange Date. After receiving the notice, the Certificate Administrator will be required to e-mail the Certificateholder (at such address specified in writing by such Certificateholder) with wire payment instructions relating to the exchange fee. The Certificateholder and the Certificate Administrator will utilize the “deposit and withdrawal system” at DTC to effect the exchange.

The aggregate principal and interest entitlements of the Certificates received will equal the aggregate entitlements of principal and interest of the Certificates surrendered. The notice of exchange will become irrevocable on the 2nd business day before the proposed Exchange Date.

In connection with each exchange, the Certificateholder must pay the Certificate Administrator an exchange fee of $5,000 (together with any other expenses related to such exchange (including fees charged by DTC), and such fee (and expenses) must be received by the Certificate Administrator prior to the Exchange Date or such exchange will not be effected. The first distribution on an Exchangeable Certificate received pursuant to an exchange will be made in the month following the month of exchange to the Certificateholder of record as of the applicable Record Date for such Certificate. None of the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee or the Depositor will have any obligation to ensure the availability of the applicable Certificates to accomplish any exchange.

Distributions

Method, Timing and Amount

Distributions on the Certificates are required to be made on the 4th business day following the related Determination Date of each month (each, a “Distribution Date”), commencing in October 2015. All distributions (other than the final distribution on any Certificate) are required to be made by the Certificate Administrator to the persons in whose names the Certificates are registered at the close of business on the last day of the month immediately preceding the month in which the related Distribution Date occurs (or, if such day is not a business day, the immediately preceding business day) (that date, the “Record Date”). Distributions are required to be made (a) by wire transfer in immediately available funds to the account specified by the Certificateholder at a bank or other entity having appropriate facilities for such payment, if the Certificateholder provides the Certificate Administrator with wiring instructions no less than five business days prior to the related Record Date, or otherwise (b) by check mailed to the Certificateholder. The final distribution on any Certificates is required to be made in like manner, but only upon presentment and surrender of the Certificate at the location specified in the notice to the Certificateholder of such final distribution. All distributions made with respect to a Class of Offered Certificates on each Distribution Date will be allocated pro rata among the outstanding Certificates of such Class based on their respective Percentage Interests. The “Percentage Interest” evidenced by: (a) any Certificate (other than a Class R Certificate) will equal its initial denomination as of the Closing Date divided by the initial Certificate Principal Amount or Notional Amount, as applicable, of the related Class; and (b) any Class R Certificate will be the percentage interest in the applicable Class specified on the face of that Certificate. For these purposes on any date of determination, the “initial denomination as of the Closing Date” of any Exchangeable Certificate received in an exchange will be determined as if such Certificate was part of the related Class on the Closing Date, the “initial denomination as of the Closing Date” of any Exchangeable Certificate surrendered in an exchange will be determined as if such Certificate was not part of the related Class on the Closing Date and the initial Certificate Principal Amount of the related Class of Exchangeable Certificates will be

S-248

determined as if such Class consisted only of the Certificates composing the Class on that date of determination and such Certificates had been outstanding as of the Closing Date.

The aggregate distribution to be made on the Certificates on any Distribution Date (exclusive of distributions of Excess Interest, yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums) will equal the Available Funds. The “Available Funds” for a Distribution Date will, in general, equal the sum of the following amounts (without duplication):

(i)    the total amount of all cash received on the Mortgage Loans and any REO Properties that are on deposit in the Collection Account and the Lower-Tier Distribution Account, as of the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the related Master Servicer Remittance Date, exclusive of (without duplication) any portion of the foregoing that represents:

(A)     all Monthly Payments and balloon payments collected but due on a Due Date (without regard to grace periods) that occurs after the end of the related Collection Period;

(B)     all unscheduled payments of principal (including prepayments) and interest, net liquidation proceeds, net insurance proceeds and Net Condemnation Proceeds and other unscheduled recoveries, together with any Monthly Payments and any balloon payments, that were received after the related Determination Date (other than the monthly remittance on the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans or the Issuing Entity’s interest in any related REO Property contemplated by clause (ii) of this definition);

(C)     all amounts in the Collection Account that are due or reimbursable to any person other than the Certificateholders;

(D)     with respect to each Mortgage Loan that accrues interest on an Actual/360 Basis and any Distribution Date occurring in January (except in a leap year) or February of each calendar year (commencing in 2016) (unless, in either case, such Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date), the related Withheld Amount to the extent those funds are on deposit in the Collection Account and held pending transfer to the Interest Reserve Account;

(E)     all amounts representing Excess Interest;

(F)     all yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums;

(G)     all amounts deposited in the Collection Account or the Lower-Tier Distribution Account in error; and

(H)     any late payment charges, any default interest received on any Mortgage Loan in excess of interest calculated at the Mortgage Loan Rate for the Mortgage Loan and any similar fees and charges;

(ii)   if and to the extent not already included in clause (i) above, the aggregate amount transferred from any REO Account to the Collection Account for such Distribution Date pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the remittance received on the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans or the Issuing Entity’s interest in any related REO Property in the month of such Distribution Date, to the extent that each such transfer is made or such remittance is received by the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the related Master Servicer Remittance Date;

(iii)  all Compensating Interest Payments made by the Master Servicer with respect to such Distribution Date and all P&I Advances made by the Master Servicer or the Trustee, as applicable, with respect to such Distribution Date (net of certain amounts that are due or reimbursable to persons other than the Certificateholders); and

(iv)  for the Distribution Date occurring in each March (or February if the final Distribution Date occurs in that month), the related Withheld Amounts required to be deposited in the Lower-Tier Distribution Account pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

S-249

“Monthly Payment” with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan (other than any REO Mortgage Loan or REO Companion Loan) and any Due Date is the scheduled monthly payment of principal (if any) and interest at the related Mortgage Loan Rate which is payable by the related borrower on such Due Date. The Monthly Payment with respect to any Due Date for (i) an REO Mortgage Loan or REO Companion Loan, (ii) any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan that is delinquent at its maturity date and with respect to which the Special Servicer has not entered into an extension or (iii) any ARD Loan after the related Anticipated Repayment Date, is the monthly payment that would otherwise have been payable on such Due Date had the related Mortgage Note not been discharged or the related maturity date or Anticipated Repayment Date, as applicable, had not been reached, as the case may be, determined as set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Monthly Payment for any Serviced Loan Combination is the aggregate Monthly Payment for the related Mortgage Loan and Serviced Companion Loan.

“Net Condemnation Proceeds” are the Condemnation Proceeds received with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan (including an REO Mortgage Loan or REO Companion Loan) net of the amount of (i) costs and expenses incurred with respect thereto and (ii) amounts required to be applied to the restoration or repair of the related Mortgaged Property.

“Condemnation Proceeds” are all of the proceeds received in connection with the taking of all or a part of a Mortgaged Property or REO Property (including with respect to each Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan and including any Mortgaged Property or REO Property securing a Serviced Companion Loan) by exercise of the power of eminent domain or condemnation, subject, however, to the rights of any tenants and ground lessors, as the case may be, and the terms of the related Mortgage. In the case of an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, “Condemnation Proceeds” means any portion of such proceeds received by the Issuing Entity in connection with such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, pursuant to the allocations set forth in the related Co-Lender Agreement.

“Collection Period” with respect to a Distribution Date and each Mortgage Loan (including an REO Mortgage Loan) is the period beginning on the day immediately following the Due Date (without regard to grace periods) in the month preceding the month in which such Distribution Date occurs (or, in the case of the Distribution Date occurring in October 2015, beginning on the day after the Cut-off Date) and ending on and including the Due Date (without regard to grace periods) in the month in which such Distribution Date occurs.

“Determination Date” with respect to any Distribution Date is the sixth day of the calendar month of the related Distribution Date or, if the sixth day is not a business day, the next business day, commencing in October 2015.

Payment Priorities

As used below in describing the priorities of distribution of Available Funds for each Distribution Date, the terms set forth below will have the following meanings:

The “Interest Accrual Amount” with respect to any Distribution Date and any Class of Regular Certificates or any Trust Component is equal to interest for the related Interest Accrual Period accrued at the Pass-Through Rate for such Class or Trust Component on the related Certificate Principal Amount or Notional Amount, as applicable, immediately prior to that Distribution Date. Calculations of interest on the Regular Certificates and the Trust Components will be made on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months.

The “Interest Accrual Period” with respect to any Distribution Date is the calendar month preceding the month in which such Distribution Date occurs. Each Interest Accrual Period with respect to each Class of Sequential Pay Certificates and Class X Certificates and each Trust Component is assumed to consist of 30 days.

The “Interest Distribution Amount” with respect to any Distribution Date and each Class of Regular Certificates and each Trust Component will equal (A) the sum of (i) the Interest Accrual Amount with respect to such Class or Trust Component for such Distribution Date and (ii) the Interest Shortfall, if any, with respect to such Class or Trust Component for such Distribution Date, less (B) any Excess Prepayment Interest Shortfall allocated to such Class or Trust Component on such Distribution Date.

An “Interest Shortfall” with respect to any Distribution Date for any Class of Regular Certificates or any Trust Component, in general, is the sum of (A) the portion of the Interest Distribution Amount for such Class or Trust Component remaining unpaid as of the close of business on the preceding Distribution Date (if any), and (B) to the extent permitted by applicable law, (i) other than in the case of a Class of Class X Certificates, one month’s

S-250

interest on that amount remaining unpaid at the Pass-Through Rate applicable to such Class of Certificates or Trust Component for the current Distribution Date and (ii) in the case of a Class of Class X Certificates, one-month’s interest on that amount remaining unpaid at the WAC Rate for such Distribution Date.

The “Pass-Through Rate” with respect to any Class of Sequential Pay Certificates, any Class of Class X Certificates or any Trust Component for any Interest Accrual Period and the related Distribution Date is the per annum rate at which interest accrues on the Certificates of such Class or Trust Component during such Interest Accrual Period.

The Pass-Through Rate with respect to each Class of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB, Class A-S and Class D Certificates for any Distribution Date will be fixed at the initial Pass-Through Rate for such Class set forth in the table under “Certificate Summary” in this prospectus supplement.

The Pass-Through Rate with respect to each Class of the Class B, Class C, Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H Certificates for any Distribution Date will be equal to the WAC Rate for such Distribution Date.

The Pass-Through Rate on the Class X-A Certificates is variable and, for each Distribution Date, will be a per annum rate equal to the weighted average of the Class X Strip Rates for the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates and the Class A-S Trust Component for such Distribution Date (weighted on the basis of the respective Certificate Principal Amounts of such Classes of Certificates and such Trust Component immediately prior to such Distribution Date). The Pass-Through Rate on the Class X-D Certificates is variable and, for each Distribution Date, will be a per annum rate equal to the Class X Strip Rate for the Class D Certificates for such Distribution Date.

The Pass-Through Rates for the Class A-S Certificates and the Class A-S Trust Component will, at all times, be the same. The Pass-Through Rates for the Class B Certificates and the Class B Trust Component will, at all times, be the same. The Pass-Through Rates for the Class C Certificates and the Class C Trust Component will, at all times, be the same.

The Class PEZ Certificates will not have a Pass-Through Rate, but will be entitled to receive the sum of the interest distributable on the percentage interests of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Trust Components represented by the Class PEZ Certificates.

The “Class X Strip Rate” for each Class of Sequential Pay Certificates (other than the Exchangeable Certificates) and each Trust Component for any Distribution Date will be a per annum rate equal to the excess of (i) the WAC Rate for such Distribution Date over (ii) the Pass-Through Rate on such Class of Sequential Pay Certificates or Trust Component for such Distribution Date.

The “WAC Rate” with respect to any Distribution Date is a per annum rate equal to the weighted average of the Net Mortgage Loan Rates in effect for the Mortgage Loans (including the REO Mortgage Loans) as of their respective Due Dates in the month preceding the month in which such Distribution Date occurs, weighted on the basis of the respective Stated Principal Balances of the Mortgage Loans immediately following the Distribution Date (or, if applicable, the Closing Date) in such preceding month.

The “Net Mortgage Loan Rate” with respect to any Mortgage Loan (including any REO Mortgage Loan) is a per annum rate equal to the related Mortgage Loan Rate minus the related Administrative Fee Rate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of calculating Pass-Through Rates and the WAC Rate, the Net Mortgage Loan Rate of each Mortgage Loan that accrues interest on an Actual/360 Basis for any one-month period preceding a related Due Date will be the annualized rate at which interest would have to accrue in respect of such Mortgage Loan on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months in order to produce the aggregate amount of interest actually accrued (exclusive of default interest and Excess Interest) in respect of such Mortgage Loan during such one-month period at a per annum rate equal to the related Mortgage Loan Rate minus the related Administrative Fee Rate. However, for purposes of calculating Pass-Through Rates and the WAC Rate, with respect to each Mortgage Loan that accrues interest on an Actual/360 Basis, (i) the Net Mortgage Loan Rate for the one-month period preceding the Due Dates in January and February in any year which is not a leap year and in February in any year which is a leap year (unless, in either case, the related Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date) will be determined based on the “aggregate amount of interest actually accrued”, as referred to above in the preceding sentence, being net of the related Withheld Amounts and (ii) the Net Mortgage Loan Rate for the one-month period preceding the Due Date in March will be determined

S-251

based on the “aggregate amount of interest actually accrued”, as referred to above in the preceding sentence, taking into account the addition of any such Withheld Amounts. Also, for purposes of calculating Pass-Through Rates and the WAC Rate, the Net Mortgage Loan Rate of any Mortgage Loan will be determined without regard to any modification, waiver or amendment of the terms of such Mortgage Loan, whether agreed to by the Special Servicer or an Outside Special Servicer or resulting from a bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceeding involving the related borrower, and without regard to the related Mortgaged Property becoming an REO Property.

The “Administrative Fee Rate” for any Mortgage Loan (including any REO Mortgage Loan) as of any date of determination will be equal to the sum of the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate, the Servicing Fee Rate, the Operating Advisor Fee Rate and the Trustee/Certificate Administrator Fee Rate.

“CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee” will accrue with respect to each Mortgage Loan (including any REO Mortgage Loan) at the per annum rate equal to 0.0005% calculated on the basis of the Stated Principal Balance of the related Mortgage Loan on the same basis as interest is calculated on the related Mortgage Loan and will be prorated for partial periods, and will be payable monthly from general collections on all the Mortgage Loans and any REO Properties.

The “Mortgage Loan Rate” with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan (including any REO Mortgage Loan or REO Companion Loan) is the per annum rate at which interest accrues on such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan, as stated in the related Mortgage Note in each case without giving effect to the default rate, Excess Interest or the Revised Rate.

The “Stated Principal Balance” of each Mortgage Loan will initially equal its Cut-off Date Balance (or in the case of a Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan, the unpaid principal balance of such Mortgage Loan after application of all scheduled payments of principal and interest due during or prior to the month of substitution, whether or not received) and, on each Distribution Date, will be reduced by any and all amounts (without duplication) described in clauses (a)(1), (a)(2) and (a)(3) of the definition of “Principal Distribution Amount” below that are allocable to such Mortgage Loan for such Distribution Date.

The Stated Principal Balance of each Serviced Companion Loan will initially equal its unpaid principal balance as of the Cut-off Date, after application of all scheduled payments of principal and interest due on or before the Cut-off Date, whether or not received, and on each Distribution Date, will be reduced by any payments or other collections of principal on such Serviced Companion Loan that are received by the holder thereof in the month of such Distribution Date.

The Stated Principal Balance of a Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan may also be reduced in connection with any modification that reduces the principal amount due on such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan, as the case may be, or any forced reduction of its actual unpaid principal balance imposed by a court presiding over a bankruptcy proceeding in which the related borrower is the debtor. See “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Issues” in the prospectus. If any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan is paid in full or such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan (or any Mortgaged Property acquired in respect of the Mortgage Loan or any Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) is otherwise liquidated, then, as of the first Distribution Date that follows the first Determination Date on or before which the payment in full or liquidation occurred and notwithstanding that a loss may have occurred in connection with any liquidation, the Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage Loan or Serviced Companion Loan, as the case may be, will be zero. The “Stated Principal Balance” of a Serviced Loan Combination, as of any date of determination, is equal to the then aggregate Stated Principal Balance of the related Serviced Mortgage Loan and Serviced Companion Loan.

The “Principal Distribution Amount” for any Distribution Date will be equal to:

(a) the sum, without duplication, of:

(1)      the principal component of all scheduled Monthly Payments and balloon payments due on the Mortgage Loans (including the REO Mortgage Loans) on their respective Due Dates immediately preceding such Distribution Date (if and to the extent received by the Master Servicer by the related Determination Date (or, in the case of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans, by the business day immediately preceding the related Master Servicer Remittance Date) or (other than balloon payments) advanced by the Master Servicer or Trustee in respect of such Distribution Date);

S-252

(2)     the principal component of any payment on any Mortgage Loan received or applied on or after the date on which such payment was due which is on deposit in the Collection Account as of the related Determination Date (or, in the case of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans, as of the business day immediately preceding the related Master Servicer Remittance Date), net of the principal portion of any unreimbursed P&I Advances related to such Mortgage Loan;

(3)     the Unscheduled Payments with respect to the Mortgage Loans (including the REO Mortgage Loans) with respect to such Distribution Date; and

(4)     the Principal Shortfall, if any, for such Distribution Date, less

(b) the sum, without duplication, of the amount of any reimbursements of:

(1)     Non-Recoverable Advances, with interest on such Non-Recoverable Advances, that are paid or reimbursed to the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and/or the Trustee from principal collected on the Mortgage Loans in a period during which such principal collections would have otherwise been included in the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date; and

(2)     Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amounts that are paid or reimbursed to the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and/or the Trustee from principal collected on the Mortgage Loans in a period during which such principal collections would have otherwise been included in the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date;

provided that, if any of the amounts of the type described in clauses (b)(1) and (b)(2) above that were allocated to reduce the Principal Distribution Amount for a prior Distribution Date are subsequently recovered, such recovery will be added to the Principal Distribution Amount for the Distribution Date related to the applicable one-month period in which such recovery occurs.

The “Principal Shortfall” for any Distribution Date means the amount, if any, by which (i) the Principal Distribution Amount for the preceding Distribution Date exceeds (ii) the aggregate amount actually distributed on such preceding Distribution Date in respect of such Principal Distribution Amount.

The “Unscheduled Payments” for any Distribution Date will equal the aggregate of: (a) all prepayments of principal received on the Mortgage Loans during the applicable one-month period ending on the related Determination Date (or, in the case of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans, all principal prepayments received during the period that renders them includable in the Available Funds for such Distribution Date); and (b) any other collections (exclusive of payments by borrowers) received on the Mortgage Loans and any REO Properties (or the Issuing Entity’s interest in any Mortgaged Property acquired through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure with respect to an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan) during the applicable one-month period ending on the related Determination Date (or, in the case of an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan or any interest in REO Property acquired with respect thereto, all such proceeds received during the period that renders them includable in the Available Funds for such Distribution Date), whether in the form of Liquidation Proceeds, insurance proceeds, condemnation proceeds, net income, rents, and profits from any REO Property or otherwise, that were identified and applied by the Master Servicer and/or, in the case of an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, the Outside Servicer, as recoveries of previously unadvanced principal of the related Mortgage Loan, and, in the case of Liquidation Proceeds, insurance proceeds and condemnation proceeds, net of any Special Servicing Fees, Liquidation Fees, accrued interest on Advances and other additional expenses of the Issuing Entity incurred in connection with the related Mortgage Loan.

An “REO Mortgage Loan” is any Mortgage Loan as to which the related Mortgaged Property has become an REO Property (including, in the case of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans, if the related Mortgaged Property has been acquired through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure under an Outside Servicing Agreement).

An “REO Companion Loan” is any Serviced Companion Loan as to which the related Mortgaged Property has become an REO Property.

S-253

On each Distribution Date, the Available Funds are required to be distributed in the following amounts and order of priority:

First, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class X-A Certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to, and pro rata in accordance with, the respective Interest Distribution Amounts for those Classes;

Second, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates, in reduction of the Certificate Principal Amounts of those Classes, in the following priority:

(i)   to the Class A-AB Certificates, in an amount equal to the lesser of the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date and the amount necessary to reduce the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class A-AB Certificates to the scheduled principal balance set forth on Annex F to this prospectus supplement with respect to the Class A-AB Certificates (the “Class A-AB Scheduled Principal Balance”) for such Distribution Date;

(ii)   to the Class A-1 Certificates, in an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount (or the portion of it remaining after payments specified in clause (i) above) for such Distribution Date, until the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class A-1 Certificates is reduced to zero;

(iii)   to the Class A-2 Certificates, in an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount (or the portion of it remaining after payments specified in clauses (i) and (ii) above) for such Distribution Date, until the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class A-2 Certificates is reduced to zero;

(iv)   to the Class A-3 Certificates, in an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount (or the portion of it remaining after payments specified in clauses (i) through (iii) above) for such Distribution Date, until the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class A-3 Certificates is reduced to zero;

(v)   to the Class A-4 Certificates, in an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount (or the portion of it remaining after payments specified in clauses (i) through (iv) above) for such Distribution Date, until the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class A-4 Certificates is reduced to zero; and

(vi)   to the Class A-AB Certificates, in an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount (or the portion of it remaining after payments specified in clauses (i) through (v) above) for such Distribution Date, until the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class A-AB Certificates is reduced to zero;

Third, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates, up to an amount equal to, and pro rata based upon, the aggregate unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to reduce the Certificate Principal Amount of each such Class, plus interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such Class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such Class;

Fourth, to the Class A-S Trust Component and, thus, concurrently, to the Class A-S Certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Class A-S Percentage Interest multiplied by the aggregate Interest Distribution Amount with respect to the Class A-S Trust Component, and to the Class PEZ Certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Class A-S-PEZ Percentage Interest multiplied by the aggregate Interest Distribution Amount with respect to the Class A-S Trust Component, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S Trust Component;

Fifth, to the Class A-S Trust Component and, thus, concurrently, to the Class A-S Certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Principal Amount, up to an amount equal to the Class A-S Percentage Interest multiplied by the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, and to the Class PEZ Certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Principal Amount, up to an amount equal to the Class A-S-PEZ Percentage Interest multiplied by the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S Trust Component, until the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class A-S Trust Component is reduced to zero;

S-254

Sixth, to the Class A-S Trust Component and, thus, concurrently, to the Class A-S Certificates, up to an amount equal to the Class A-S Percentage Interest multiplied by the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to reduce the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class A-S Trust Component, plus interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such Trust Component compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such Trust Component, and to the Class PEZ Certificates, up to an amount equal to the Class A-S-PEZ Percentage Interest multiplied by the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to the Class A-S Trust Component, plus interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such Trust Component compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such Trust Component, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S Trust Component;

Seventh, to the Class B Trust Component, and, thus, concurrently, to the Class B Certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Class B Percentage Interest multiplied by the aggregate Interest Distribution Amount with respect to the Class B Trust Component, and to the Class PEZ Certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Class B-PEZ Percentage Interest multiplied by the aggregate Interest Distribution Amount with respect to the Class B Trust Component, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class B Trust Component;

Eighth, to the Class B Trust Component, and, thus, concurrently, to the Class B Certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Principal Amount, up to an amount equal to the Class B Percentage Interest multiplied by the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, and to the Class PEZ Certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Principal Amount, up to an amount equal to the Class B-PEZ Percentage Interest multiplied by the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class B Trust Component, until the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class B Trust Component is reduced to zero;

Ninth, to the Class B Trust Component and, thus, concurrently, to the Class B Certificates, up to an amount equal to the Class B Percentage Interest multiplied by the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to reduce the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class B Trust Component, plus interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such Trust Component compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such Trust Component, and to the Class PEZ Certificates, up to an amount equal to the Class B-PEZ Percentage Interest multiplied by the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to the Class B Trust Component, plus interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such Trust Component compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such Trust Component, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class B Trust Component;

Tenth, to the Class C Trust Component and, thus, concurrently, to the Class C Certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Class C Percentage Interest multiplied by the aggregate Interest Distribution Amount with respect to the Class C Trust Component, and to the Class PEZ Certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Class C-PEZ Percentage Interest multiplied by the aggregate Interest Distribution Amount with respect to the Class C Trust Component, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class C Trust Component;

Eleventh, to the Class C Trust Component, and, thus, concurrently, to the Class C Certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Principal Amount, up to an amount equal to the Class C Percentage Interest multiplied by the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, and to the Class PEZ Certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Principal Amount, up to an amount equal to the Class C-PEZ Percentage Interest multiplied by the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class C Trust Component, until the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class C Trust Component is reduced to zero;

Twelfth, to the Class C Trust Component and, thus, concurrently, to the Class C Certificates, up to an amount equal to the Class C Percentage Interest multiplied by the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to reduce the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class C Trust Component, plus interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such Trust Component compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such Trust Component, and to the Class PEZ Certificates, up to an amount equal to the Class C-PEZ Percentage Interest multiplied by the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to the Class C Trust Component, plus interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such Trust

S-255

Component compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such Trust Component, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class C Trust Component;

Thirteenth, to the Class D and Class X-D Certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to, and pro rata in accordance with, the respective Interest Distribution Amounts of such Classes;

Fourteenth, to the Class D Certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Principal Amount, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until their Certificate Principal Amount is reduced to zero;

Fifteenth, to the Class D Certificates, up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to reduce the Certificate Principal Amount of such Class, plus interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such Class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such Class;

Sixteenth, to the Class E Certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such Class;

Seventeenth, to the Class E Certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Principal Amount, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until their Certificate Principal Amount is reduced to zero;

Eighteenth, to the Class E Certificates, up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to reduce the Certificate Principal Amount of such Class, plus interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such Class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such Class;

Nineteenth, to the Class F Certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such Class;

Twentieth, to the Class F Certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Principal Amount, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until their Certificate Principal Amount is reduced to zero;

Twenty-first, to the Class F Certificates, up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to reduce the Certificate Principal Amount of such Class, plus interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such Class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such Class;

Twenty-second, to the Class G Certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such Class;

Twenty-third, to the Class G Certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Principal Amount, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until their Certificate Principal Amount is reduced to zero;

Twenty-fourth, to the Class G Certificates, up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to reduce the Certificate Principal Amount of such Class, plus interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such Class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such Class;

Twenty-fifth, to the Class H Certificates, in respect of interest, up to an amount equal to the Interest Distribution Amount of such Class;

Twenty-sixth, to the Class H Certificates, in reduction of their Certificate Principal Amount, up to an amount equal to the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date, less the portion of such Principal Distribution Amount distributed pursuant to all prior clauses, until their Certificate Principal Amount is reduced to zero;

S-256

Twenty-seventh, to the Class H Certificates, up to an amount equal to the aggregate of unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to reduce the Certificate Principal Amount of such Class, plus interest on that amount at the Pass-Through Rate for such Class compounded monthly from the date the related Realized Loss was allocated to such Class; and

Twenty-eighth, to the Class R Certificates, any remaining amounts.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, on each Distribution Date occurring on and after the date on which the aggregate Certificate Principal Amount of all Sequential Pay Certificates (other than the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates and other than the Exchangeable Certificates) and each Trust Component is (or is expected to be) reduced to zero (that date, the “Cross Over Date”), regardless of the allocation of principal payments described in priority Second above, the Principal Distribution Amount for such Distribution Date is required to be distributed, pro rata (based on their respective outstanding Certificate Principal Amounts), among the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates, in reduction of their respective Certificate Principal Amounts.

Prepayment Premiums

On any Distribution Date, prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges collected prior to the related Determination Date are required to be distributed to the holders of the Classes of Certificates as described below.

On each Distribution Date, each yield maintenance charge collected on the Mortgage Loans and on deposit in the Collection Account as of the related Determination Date is required to be distributed to Certificateholders (excluding holders of the Class X-D, Class E, Class F, Class G, Class H and Class R Certificates) as follows: (a) first such yield maintenance charge will be allocated between (i) the group (the “YM Group A”) of Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates and the Class A-S Trust Component (and correspondingly the Class A-S and Class PEZ Certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S Trust Component), and (ii) the group (the “YM Group B” and collectively with the YM Group A, the “YM Groups”) of the Class B Trust Component (and correspondingly the Class B and Class PEZ Certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class B Trust Component), the Class C Trust Component (and correspondingly the Class C and Class PEZ Certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class C Trust Component) and the Class D Certificates, pro rata based upon the aggregate amount of principal distributed to the Classes of Regular Certificates and Trust Components (and, therefore, the applicable Classes of Exchangeable Certificates) in each YM Group on such Distribution Date, and (b) then (1) the portion of such yield maintenance charge allocated to each YM Group will be further allocated as among the Classes of Regular Certificates and Trust Components in such YM Group, in the following manner: each Class of Regular Certificates and each Trust Component in such YM Group will entitle the applicable Certificateholders to receive on the applicable Distribution Date that portion of such yield maintenance charge equal to the product of (x) a fraction whose numerator is the amount of principal distributed to such Class or Trust Component on such Distribution Date and whose denominator is the total amount of principal distributed to all of the Regular Certificates and Trust Components in that YM Group on such Distribution Date, (y) the Base Interest Fraction for the related principal prepayment and such Class of Certificates or Trust Component, and (z) the amount of such yield maintenance charge allocated to such YM Group, and (2) the amount of such yield maintenance charge allocated to each YM Group and remaining after such distributions will be distributed to the holders of the Class X-A Certificates. If there is more than one Class of Regular Certificates and/or Trust Component (and, therefore, the applicable Classes of Exchangeable Certificates) in either YM Group entitled to distributions of principal on any particular Distribution Date on which yield maintenance charges are distributable to such Classes and/or Trust Components, the aggregate amount of such yield maintenance charges will be allocated among all such Classes of Regular Certificates and/or Trust Components (and, therefore, the applicable Classes of Exchangeable Certificates) up to, and on a pro rata basis in accordance with, their respective entitlements in those yield maintenance charges in accordance with the first sentence of this paragraph.

The “Base Interest Fraction” with respect to any principal prepayment on any Mortgage Loan and with respect to any Class of Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class D Certificates or any Trust Component is a fraction (a) whose numerator is the amount, if any, by which (i) the Pass-Through Rate on such Class of Certificates or Trust Component exceeds (ii) the discount rate used in accordance with the related Mortgage Loan documents in calculating the yield maintenance charge with respect to such principal prepayment and (b) whose denominator is the amount, if any, by which (i) the Mortgage Loan Rate on such Mortgage Loan exceeds (ii) the discount rate used in accordance with the related Mortgage Loan documents in calculating the

S-257

yield maintenance charge with respect to such principal prepayment; provided, however, that under no circumstances will the Base Interest Fraction be greater than one. However, if such discount rate is greater than or equal to both of (x) the Mortgage Loan Rate on such Mortgage Loan and (y) the Pass-Through Rate described in the preceding sentence, then the Base Interest Fraction will equal zero, and if such discount rate is greater than or equal to the Mortgage Loan Rate on such Mortgage Loan, but less than the Pass-Through Rate described in the preceding sentence, then the Base Interest Fraction will equal one.

If a prepayment premium is imposed in connection with a prepayment rather than a yield maintenance charge, then the prepayment premium so collected will be allocated as described above. For this purpose, the discount rate used to calculate the Base Interest Fraction will be the discount rate used to determine the yield maintenance charge for Mortgage Loans that require payment at the greater of a yield maintenance charge or a minimum amount equal to a fixed percentage of the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan or, for Mortgage Loans that only have a prepayment premium based on a fixed percentage of the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan, such other discount rate as may be specified in the related Mortgage Loan documents.

No prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges will be distributed to holders of the Class X-D, Class E, Class F, Class G, Class H or Class R Certificates. Instead, after the Notional Amount of the Class X-A Certificates and the Certificate Principal Amounts of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class D Certificates and the Trust Components have been reduced to zero, all prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges with respect to Mortgage Loans will be distributed to holders of the Class X-A Certificates.

We cannot assure you that any yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium is required or, even if required, would be paid. See “Risk Factors—Some Provisions in the Mortgage Loans Underlying Your Offered Certificates May Be Challenged as Being Unenforceable—Prepayment Premiums, Fees and Charges” and “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Default Interest and Limitations on Prepayments” in the prospectus.

Prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges will be distributed on any Distribution Date only to the extent they are received in respect of the Mortgage Loans as of the related Determination Date.

Allocation Priority of Mortgage Loan Collections

All amounts collected by or on behalf of the Issuing Entity in respect of any Mortgage Loan in the form of payments from the borrowers, Liquidation Proceeds, condemnation proceeds or insurance proceeds are to be allocated to amounts due and owing under the related Mortgage Loan documents in accordance with the express provisions of the related loan documents and any related Co-Lender Agreement (and, in the case of an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, the provisions of the Outside Servicing Agreement); provided that, in the absence of such express provisions of the related Mortgage Loan documents and in any event after an event of default under the related Mortgage Loan (to the extent not cured or waived), such amounts will be deemed allocated for purposes of collecting amounts due under the Mortgage Loan, in each case only to the extent such amount is an obligation of the related borrower in the related Mortgage Loan documents, pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in the following order of priority:

First, as a recovery of any unreimbursed Advances with respect to the related Mortgage Loan and unpaid interest on all Advances and, if applicable, unreimbursed and unpaid expenses of the Issuing Entity with respect to such Mortgage Loan;

Second, as a recovery of any Non-Recoverable Advances related to such Mortgage Loan and any interest on those Non-Recoverable Advances, to the extent previously reimbursed from principal collections with respect to the other Mortgage Loans;

Third, to the extent not previously allocated pursuant to clause First, as a recovery of accrued and unpaid interest on such Mortgage Loan (exclusive of default interest and Excess Interest) to the extent of the excess of (i) accrued and unpaid interest on such Mortgage Loan at the related Mortgage Loan Rate through and including the end of the related Mortgage Loan interest accrual period ending in the applicable one-month period in which such collections are received by or on behalf of the Issuing Entity (or, in the case of a full Monthly Payment, through the related Due Date), over (ii) the cumulative amount of the reductions (if any) in the amount of related P&I Advances for such Mortgage Loan that have occurred in connection with related Appraisal Reduction

S-258

Amounts (to the extent collections have not been allocated as recovery of accrued and unpaid interest on earlier dates pursuant to clause Fifth below);

Fourth, to the extent not previously allocated pursuant to clause First, as a recovery of principal of such Mortgage Loan then due and owing, including by reason of acceleration of such Mortgage Loan following a default thereunder (or, if the Mortgage Loan has been liquidated, as a recovery of principal to the extent of its entire remaining unpaid principal balance);

Fifth, as a recovery of accrued and unpaid interest on such Mortgage Loan to the extent of the cumulative amount of the reductions (if any) in the amount of related P&I Advances for such Mortgage Loan that have occurred in connection with related Appraisal Reduction Amounts (to the extent collections have not been allocated as recovery of accrued and unpaid interest on earlier dates pursuant to this clause Fifth);

Sixth, as a recovery of amounts to be currently allocated to the payment of, or escrowed for the future payment of, real estate taxes, assessments and insurance premiums and similar items relating to such Mortgage Loan;

Seventh, as a recovery of any other reserves to the extent then required to be held in escrow with respect to such Mortgage Loan;

Eighth, as a recovery of any yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan;

Ninth, as a recovery of any default interest, Excess Interest and late payment charges then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan;

Tenth, as a recovery of any Assumption Fees, assumption application fees and Modification Fees then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan;

Eleventh, as a recovery of any other amounts then due and owing under such Mortgage Loan other than remaining unpaid principal; and

Twelfth, as a recovery of any remaining principal of such Mortgage Loan to the extent of its entire remaining unpaid principal balance;

provided that, to the extent required under the REMIC provisions of the Code, payments or proceeds received with respect to any partial release of a Mortgaged Property (including following a condemnation) if, immediately following such release, the loan-to-value ratio of the related Mortgage Loan or the related Serviced Loan Combination exceeds 125% (based solely on the value of the real property and excluding personal property and going concern value, if any), must be allocated to reduce the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan or the related Serviced Loan Combination in the manner permitted by such REMIC provisions.

Collections by or on behalf of the Issuing Entity in respect of any REO Property (exclusive of the amounts to be allocated to the payment of the costs of operating, managing, leasing, maintaining and disposing of such REO Property and, except as otherwise expressly set forth in any related Co-Lender Agreement and, in the case of an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, except as otherwise expressly set forth in the Outside Servicing Agreement) will be deemed allocated for purposes of collecting amounts due under the related deemed REO Mortgage Loan, in each case only to the extent such amount is or was an obligation of the related borrower in the related Mortgage Loan documents, in the following order of priority:

First, as a recovery of any unreimbursed Advances with respect to the related REO Mortgage Loan and interest on all Advances and, if applicable, unreimbursed and unpaid expenses of the Issuing Entity with respect to the related REO Mortgage Loan;

Second, as a recovery of any Non-Recoverable Advances on the related REO Mortgage Loan or interest on those Non-Recoverable Advances, to the extent previously reimbursed from principal collections with respect to the other Mortgage Loans;

S-259

Third, to the extent not previously allocated pursuant to clause First, as a recovery of accrued and unpaid interest on the related REO Mortgage Loan (exclusive of default interest and Excess Interest) to the extent of the excess of (i) accrued and unpaid interest on the related REO Mortgage Loan at the related Mortgage Loan Rate to but not including the Due Date in the applicable one-month period in which such collections were received, over (ii) the cumulative amount of the reductions (if any) in the amount of related P&I Advances for the related REO Mortgage Loan that have occurred in connection with related Appraisal Reduction Amounts (to the extent collections have not been allocated as recovery of accrued and unpaid interest on earlier dates pursuant to clause Fifth below or clause Fifth of the prior waterfall under this “—Allocation Priority of Mortgage Loan Collections” above);

Fourth, to the extent not previously allocated pursuant to clause First, as a recovery of principal of the related REO Mortgage Loan to the extent of its entire unpaid principal balance;

Fifth, as a recovery of accrued and unpaid interest on the related REO Mortgage Loan to the extent of the cumulative amount of the reductions (if any) in the amount of related P&I Advances for such REO Mortgage Loan that have occurred in connection with related Appraisal Reduction Amounts (to the extent collections have not been allocated as recovery of accrued and unpaid interest on earlier dates pursuant to this clause Fifth or clause Fifth of the prior waterfall under this “—Allocation Priority of Mortgage Loan Collections” above);

Sixth, as a recovery of any yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium then due and owing under the related REO Mortgage Loan;

Seventh, as a recovery of any default interest, Excess Interest and late payment charges then due and owing under the related REO Mortgage Loan;

Eighth, as a recovery of any Assumption Fees, assumption application fees and Modification Fees then due and owing under the related REO Mortgage Loan; and

Ninth, as a recovery of any other amounts then due and owing under the related REO Mortgage Loan.

Collections and recoveries with respect to any Loan Combination or any related REO Property are generally to be allocated in accordance with the terms and conditions of (i) (A) with respect to an Outside Serviced Loan Combination, the Outside Servicing Agreement, or (B) with respect to a Serviced Loan Combination, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (ii) the related Co-Lender Agreement, and/or (iii) the related Mortgage Loan documents, as applicable. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.

Realized Losses

The Certificate Principal Amount of each Class of Principal Balance Certificates and each Trust Component will be reduced without distribution on any Distribution Date as a write-off to the extent of any Realized Loss allocated to such Class or Trust Component on such Distribution Date. A “Realized Loss” with respect to any Distribution Date is the amount, if any, by which the aggregate Certificate Principal Amount of all Classes of Principal Balance Certificates (other than the Exchangeable Certificates) and the Trust Components after giving effect to distributions made on such Distribution Date exceeds the aggregate Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage Loans (including any REO Mortgage Loans) after giving effect to any and all reductions in such aggregate Stated Principal Balance on such Distribution Date (for purposes of this calculation only, the aggregate Stated Principal Balance will not be reduced by the amount of principal payments received on the Mortgage Loans that were used to reimburse the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Trustee from general collections of principal on the Mortgage Loans for Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amounts, to the extent those amounts are not otherwise determined to be Non-Recoverable Advances). On each Distribution Date, any Realized Loss for such Distribution Date will be allocated to the following Classes of Principal Balance Certificates and Trust Components in the following order, until the Certificate Principal Amount of each such Class or Trust Component is reduced to zero: first, to the Class H Certificates, second, to the Class G Certificates; third, to the Class F Certificates; fourth, to the Class E Certificates; fifth, to the Class D Certificates; sixth, to the Class C Trust Component (and correspondingly, to the Class C Certificates and the Class PEZ Certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class C Trust Component); seventh, to the Class B Trust Component (and correspondingly, to the Class B Certificates and the Class PEZ Certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class B Trust Component); eighth, to the Class A-S Trust Component (and

S-260

correspondingly, to the Class A-S Certificates and the Class PEZ Certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S Trust Component); and, finally, pro rata, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates, based on their respective Certificate Principal Amounts. The Notional Amount of the Class X-A Certificates will be reduced to reflect reductions in the Certificate Principal Amounts of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates and the Class A-S Trust Component resulting from allocations of Realized Losses. The Notional Amount of the Class X-D Certificates will be reduced to reflect reductions in the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class D Certificates resulting from allocations of Realized Losses. Any amounts recovered in respect of any amounts previously written off as Realized Losses (with interest thereon) as a result of the reimbursement of Non-Recoverable Advances to the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Trustee from amounts otherwise distributable as principal will (1) increase the Principal Distribution Amount for the Distribution Date related to the applicable one-month period in which such recovery occurs and (2) will increase the Certificate Principal Amount of each Class of Principal Balance Certificates (other than the Exchangeable Certificates) and the Trust Components (in sequential order of payment priority starting with the most senior Class or Trust Component) previously subject to a reduction as a result of the allocation of Realized Losses up to an aggregate amount equal to the amount recovered. Such restoration of the Certificate Principal Amount of a Class of Principal Balance Certificates (exclusive of the Exchangeable Certificates) or Trust Component may not exceed, and will reduce on a going-forward basis, any and all unreimbursed Realized Losses previously allocated to such Class of Certificates or Trust Component, as applicable.

Shortfalls in Available Funds resulting from additional servicing compensation other than the Servicing Fee, interest on Advances to the extent not covered by Modification Fees or Penalty Charges on the related Mortgage Loan, extraordinary expenses of the Issuing Entity, items comparable to the foregoing with respect to the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans, a reduction of the interest rate of a Mortgage Loan in connection with a workout or by a bankruptcy court pursuant to a plan of reorganization or pursuant to any of its equitable powers or other unanticipated or default-related expenses will reduce the amounts distributable on the Classes of Sequential Pay Certificates (other than the Exchangeable Certificates) and the Trust Components in the same order as Realized Losses are applied to reduce the Certificate Principal Amounts of such Classes and Trust Components.

Prepayment Interest Shortfalls

If a borrower prepays a Mortgage Loan or a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, in whole or in part, after the Due Date but on or before the Determination Date in any calendar month, the amount of interest (net of related Servicing Fees, any related Excess Interest and/or default interest) accrued on such prepayment from such Due Date to, but not including, the date of prepayment (or any later date through which interest accrues) will, to the extent actually collected, constitute a “Prepayment Interest Excess”. Conversely, if a borrower prepays a Mortgage Loan or a Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan, in whole or in part, prior to the Due Date or after the Determination Date in any calendar month and does not pay interest on such prepayment through the end of the applicable interest accrual period for the next Due Date, then the shortfall in a full month’s interest (net of related Servicing Fees, any related Excess Interest and/or default interest) on such prepayment will constitute a “Prepayment Interest Shortfall.” Prepayment Interest Excesses (to the extent not offset by Prepayment Interest Shortfalls) collected on the Mortgage Loans and the Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan will be retained by the Master Servicer as additional servicing compensation, as determined on a pool-wide aggregate basis. The aggregate of any Prepayment Interest Shortfalls resulting from any principal prepayments made on the Mortgage Loans to be included in the Available Funds for any Distribution Date that are not covered by the Master Servicer’s Compensating Interest Payment for the related Distribution Date (the aggregate of the Prepayment Interest Shortfalls that are not so covered, as to the related Distribution Date, the “Excess Prepayment Interest Shortfall”) will be allocated pro rata on that Distribution Date among each Class of Regular Certificates and Trust Component, in accordance with their respective Interest Accrual Amounts for that Distribution Date.

The Master Servicer will be required to deliver to the Certificate Administrator for deposit in the Lower-Tier Distribution Account on each Master Servicer Remittance Date, without any right of reimbursement thereafter, a cash payment (a “Compensating Interest Payment”) in an amount equal to the lesser of (1) the aggregate amount of Prepayment Interest Shortfalls incurred in connection with voluntary principal prepayments received in respect of the Serviced Mortgage Loans and Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loans (other than a Specially Serviced Loan or a Defaulted Mortgage Loan), other than prepayments received in connection with the receipt of insurance proceeds or condemnation proceeds, during the one-month period ending on the Determination Date immediately preceding the related Distribution Date, and (2) the aggregate of (a) its Servicing Fee up to a maximum of 0.0025% per annum for the related Distribution Date with respect to each Serviced Mortgage Loan (and related

S-261

REO Mortgage Loan) and Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan (and related REO Companion Loan) for which such Servicing Fees are being paid during the one-month period ending on the Determination Date immediately preceding the related Distribution Date and (b) all Prepayment Interest Excesses received during the one-month period ending on the Determination Date immediately preceding the related Distribution Date and net investment earnings on such Prepayment Interest Excesses; provided that, solely with respect to a Serviced Mortgage Loan, if any Prepayment Interest Shortfall described in clause (1) above occurs as a result of the Master Servicer’s failure to enforce the related loan documents, the Master Servicer will be required to pay an amount equal to the entire Prepayment Interest Shortfall with respect to that Serviced Mortgage Loan. No Compensating Interest Payment will be made by the Master Servicer or any Outside Servicer (other than to the extent set forth in the applicable Outside Servicing Agreement) with respect to an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, Outside Serviced Companion Loan or Subordinate Companion Loan.

Subordination

As a means of providing a certain amount of protection to the holders of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class X-A Certificates against losses associated with delinquent and defaulted Mortgage Loans, the rights of the holders of the Class A-S, Class B, Class PEZ, Class C, Class D, Class X-D, Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H Certificates to receive distributions of interest and principal, as applicable, will be subordinated to such rights of the holders of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class X-A Certificates. The Class A-S Trust Component (and, correspondingly, to the extent evidencing an interest in the Class A-S Trust Component, the Class A-S and Class PEZ Certificates) will likewise be protected by the subordination of the Class B and Class C Trust Components and the Class D, Class X-D, Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H Certificates. The Class B Trust Component (and, correspondingly, to the extent evidencing an interest in the Class B Trust Component, the Class B and Class PEZ Certificates) will likewise be protected by the subordination of the Class C Trust Component and the Class D, Class X-D, Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H Certificates. The Class C Trust Component (and, correspondingly, to the extent evidencing an interest in the Class C Trust Component, the Class C and Class PEZ Certificates) will likewise be protected by the subordination of the Class D, Class X-D, Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H Certificates. The Class D and Class X-D Certificates will likewise be protected by the subordination of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H Certificates.

On and after the Cross Over Date has occurred, allocation of principal will be made to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates, pro rata based on Certificate Principal Amount, until their respective Certificate Principal Amounts have been reduced to zero (and the schedule for the Class A-AB principal distributions will be disregarded). Prior to the Cross Over Date, allocation of principal will be made as described under “—Distributions” above. Allocation to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates, for so long as they are outstanding, of the entire Principal Distribution Amount for each Distribution Date will have the effect of reducing the aggregate Certificate Principal Amount of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates at a proportionately faster rate than the rate at which the aggregate Stated Principal Balance of the pool of Mortgage Loans will decline. Therefore, as principal is distributed to the holders of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates, the percentage interest in the Issuing Entity evidenced by the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates will be decreased (with a corresponding increase in the percentage interest in the Issuing Entity evidenced by the Principal Balance Certificates (other than the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates)), thereby increasing, relative to their respective Certificate Principal Amounts, the subordination afforded the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates by the other Principal Balance Certificates.

Additionally, on and after the Cross Over Date, losses will be applied to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates, pro rata based on Certificate Principal Amount.

This subordination will be effected in two ways: (i) by the preferential right of the holders of a Class of Certificates and the Trust Components to receive on any Distribution Date the amounts of interest and/or principal distributable on their Certificates prior to any distribution being made on such Distribution Date in respect of any Classes of Certificates or Trust Components subordinate to that Class or Trust Component (as described under “—Distributions—Payment Priorities”) and (ii) by the allocation of Realized Losses: first to the Class H Certificates; second, to the Class G Certificates; third, to the Class F Certificates; fourth, to the Class E Certificates; fifth, to the Class D Certificates; sixth, to the Class C Trust Component (and correspondingly, to the Class C Certificates and the Class PEZ Certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the

S-262

Class C Trust Component); seventh, to the Class B Trust Component (and correspondingly, to the Class B Certificates and the Class PEZ Certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class B Trust Component); eighth, to the Class A-S Trust Component (and correspondingly, to the Class A-S Certificates and the Class PEZ Certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S Trust Component); and, finally, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates, pro rata, based on their respective Certificate Principal Amounts. No other form of credit enhancement will be available with respect to any Class of Certificates or Trust Component.

Appraisal Reduction Amounts

After an Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred, an Appraisal Reduction Amount is required to be calculated. An “Appraisal Reduction Event” will occur with respect to a Serviced Loan on the earliest of:

· the date on which a modification of the Serviced Loan that, among other things, reduces the amount of Monthly Payments on a Serviced Loan, or changes any other material economic term of the Serviced Loan or impairs the security of the Serviced Loan, becomes effective as a result of a modification of the related Serviced Loan following the occurrence of a Servicing Transfer Event;

· the date on which the Serviced Loan is 60 days or more delinquent in respect of any scheduled monthly debt service payment (other than a balloon payment);

· solely in the case of a delinquent balloon payment, (A) the date occurring 60 days beyond the date on which that balloon payment was due (except as described in clause B below) or (B) if the related borrower has delivered to the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer (and in either such case the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, shall promptly deliver a copy thereof to the other such servicer), a refinancing commitment acceptable to the Special Servicer prior to the date 60 days after maturity, the date occurring 120 days after the date on which that balloon payment was due (or for such shorter period beyond the date on which that balloon payment was due during which the refinancing is scheduled to occur);

· the date on which the related Mortgaged Property became an REO Property;

· the 60^th day after a receiver or similar official is appointed (and continues in that capacity) in respect of the related Mortgaged Property;

· the 60^th day after the date the related borrower is subject to a bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceedings (if not dismissed within those 60 days); or

· the date on which the Serviced Loan remains outstanding five years following any extension of its maturity date pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

If an Appraisal Reduction Event occurs with respect to any Serviced Mortgage Loan that is part of a Serviced Loan Combination, then an Appraisal Reduction Event will be deemed to have occurred with respect to the related Serviced Companion Loan(s).  If an Appraisal Reduction Event occurs with respect to any Serviced Companion Loan that is part of a Serviced Loan Combination, then an Appraisal Reduction Event will be deemed to have occurred with respect to the related Serviced Mortgage Loan and any other Serviced Companion Loan(s) included as part of that Serviced Loan Combination.

No Appraisal Reduction Event may occur at any time when the aggregate Certificate Principal Amount of all Classes of Principal Balance Certificates (other than the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates) has been reduced to zero.

Promptly upon the occurrence of an Appraisal Reduction Event with respect to a Serviced Loan, the Special Servicer is required to use reasonable efforts to obtain an appraisal of the related Mortgaged Property from an Appraiser in accordance with Member of the Appraisal Institute (“MAI”) standards. No new appraisal will be required if an appraisal from an Appraiser in accordance with MAI standards was obtained within the prior nine months unless the Special Servicer determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that such earlier

S-263

appraisal is materially inaccurate. The cost of the appraisal will be advanced by the Master Servicer and will be reimbursed to the Master Servicer as a Property Advance.

On the first Determination Date occurring on or after the receipt of the appraisal, the Special Servicer will be required to calculate the Appraisal Reduction Amount, if any, taking into account the results of such appraisal and such information, if any, reasonably requested by the Special Servicer from the Master Servicer reasonably required to calculate or recalculate the Appraisal Reduction Amount. In the event that the Special Servicer has not received any required appraisal within 120 days after the event described in the definition of “Appraisal Reduction Event” (without regard to the time periods set forth in the definition), then, solely for purposes of determining the amounts of the P&I Advances, the amount of the Appraisal Reduction Amount for or allocable to the related Serviced Mortgage Loan will be deemed to be an amount equal to 25% of the current Stated Principal Balance of such related Serviced Mortgage Loan until the appraisal is received. The Master Servicer will provide (via electronic delivery) the Special Servicer with information in its possession that is reasonably required to calculate or recalculate any Appraisal Reduction Amount pursuant to the definition thereof using reasonable efforts to deliver such information within four business days of the Special Servicer’s reasonable written request. None of the Master Servicer, the Trustee or the Certificate Administrator will calculate or verify Appraisal Reduction Amounts.

The “Appraisal Reduction Amount” for any Distribution Date and for any Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable) as to which any Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred and the Appraisal Reduction Amount is required to be calculated will be equal to the excess of (a) the Stated Principal Balance of that Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination) as of the last day of the related Collection Period over (b) the excess of (i) the sum of (A) 90% of the appraised value of the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties as determined by the appraisal, minus such downward adjustments as the Special Servicer, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, may make (without implying any obligation to do so) based upon the Special Servicer’s review of the appraisal and such other information as the Special Servicer may deem appropriate and (B) all escrows, letters of credit and reserves in respect of such Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination) as of the date of calculation over (ii) the sum as of the Due Date occurring in the month of the date of determination of (A) to the extent not previously advanced by the Master Servicer or the Trustee, all unpaid interest on that Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination) at a per annum rate equal to the Mortgage Loan Rate (and, with respect to a Serviced Loan Combination, interest on the related Serviced Companion Loan(s) at the related Mortgage Loan Rate), (B) all unreimbursed Advances and interest on those Advances at the Advance Rate in respect of that Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination) and (C) all currently due and unpaid real estate taxes and assessments, insurance premiums and ground rents, unpaid Special Servicing Fees and all other amounts due and unpaid under the Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination) (which tax, premiums, ground rents and other amounts have not been the subject of an Advance by the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Trustee, as applicable, and/or for which funds have not been escrowed). The Master Servicer and the Certificate Administrator will be entitled to conclusively rely on the Special Servicer’s calculation or determination of any Appraisal Reduction Amount. Any Appraisal Reduction Amount with respect to a Serviced Loan Combination will be allocated, first, to any related Serviced Subordinate Companion Loan (up to the outstanding principal balance thereof), and then, to the related Serviced Mortgage Loan and any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan(s) on a pro rata basis in accordance with the respective outstanding principal balances of the related Serviced Mortgage Loan and Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan. In the case of an Outside Serviced Loan Combination, pursuant to the Outside Servicing Agreement, certain events will require the calculation of an “appraisal reduction amount”, which will be allocated to the subject Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan and its Outside Serviced Companion Loan(s) on a pro rata and pari passu basis in accordance with the respective outstanding principal balances of such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan and its Outside Serviced Companion Loan(s) (with any such allocation to such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan to constitute an “Appraisal Reduction Amount” for purposes of this prospectus supplement). For the avoidance of doubt, the Outside Special Servicer (and not the Special Servicer) will be required to calculate any “appraisal reduction amount” related to an Outside Serviced Loan Combination.

An “Appraiser” is an independent nationally recognized professional commercial real estate appraiser who (i) is a member in good standing of the Appraisal Institute, (ii) if the state in which the related Mortgaged Property is located certifies or licenses appraisers, is certified or licensed in such state and (iii) has a minimum of five years’ experience in the related property type and market.

As a result of calculating one or more Appraisal Reduction Amounts, the amount of any required P&I Advance will be reduced, which will generally have the effect of reducing the amount of interest available to the most

S-264

subordinate Class of Regular Certificates or Trust Component then outstanding (i.e., first to the Class H Certificates, then to the Class G Certificates, then to the Class F Certificates, then to the Class E Certificates, then, pro rata based on interest entitlements, to the Class D and Class X-D Certificates, then to the Class C Trust Component (and correspondingly, to the Class C Certificates and the Class PEZ Certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class C Trust Component), then to the Class B Trust Component (and correspondingly, to the Class B Certificates and the Class PEZ Certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class B Trust Component), then to the Class A-S Trust Component (and correspondingly, to the Class A-S Certificates and the Class PEZ Certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S Trust Component), and then, pro rata based on interest entitlements, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class X-A Certificates). See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Advances” in this prospectus supplement.

With respect to each Serviced Loan as to which an Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred (unless the Serviced Loan has become a Corrected Loan (if a Servicing Transfer Event had occurred with respect to the related Serviced Loan) and has remained current for three consecutive Monthly Payments, and no other Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred with respect to the Serviced Loan during the preceding three months), the Special Servicer is required, within 30 days of each annual anniversary of the related Appraisal Reduction Event to order an appraisal (which may be an update of a prior appraisal), the cost of which will be a Property Advance. Based upon the appraisal, the Special Servicer is required to redetermine the amount of the Appraisal Reduction Amount with respect to the Serviced Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination).

Any Serviced Loan previously subject to an Appraisal Reduction Amount which ceases to be a Specially Serviced Loan (if applicable), which becomes current and remains current for three consecutive Monthly Payments, and with respect to which no other Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred and is continuing, will no longer be subject to an Appraisal Reduction Amount. An Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan will cease to be subject to an appraisal reduction amount upon the occurrence of certain events specified in the Outside Servicing Agreement.

For purposes of determining the Non-Reduced Certificates and the Controlling Class, as well as the occurrence of a Control Termination Event, Appraisal Reduction Amounts will be allocated to each Class of Regular Certificates (other than the Class X Certificates) and each Trust Component (and correspondingly to the applicable Classes of Exchangeable Certificates) in reverse sequential order to notionally reduce the Certificate Principal Amount thereof until the related Certificate Principal Amount of each such class is reduced to zero (i.e., first to the Class H Certificates, then to the Class G Certificates, then to the Class F Certificates, then to the Class E Certificates, then to the Class D Certificates, then to the Class C Trust Component (and correspondingly, to the Class C Certificates and the Class PEZ Certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class C Trust Component), then to the Class B Trust Component (and correspondingly, to the Class B Certificates and the Class PEZ Certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class B Trust Component), then to the Class A-S Trust Component (and correspondingly, to the Class A-S Certificates and the Class PEZ Certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S Trust Component), and then, pro rata based on Certificate Principal Amount, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates). With respect to any Appraisal Reduction Amount calculated for purposes of determining the Non-Reduced Certificates or the Controlling Class, as well as the occurrence of a Control Termination Event, the appraised value of the related Mortgaged Property will be determined on an “as-is” basis. The Special Servicer will be required to promptly notify the Certificate Administrator of any such Appraisal Reduction Amount, who will be required to promptly post notice of such Appraisal Reduction Amount to the Certificate Administrator’s internet website.

The holders of Certificates representing the majority of the Certificate Principal Amount of any Class of Control Eligible Certificates whose aggregate Certificate Principal Amount is notionally reduced to less than 25% of the initial Certificate Principal Amount of that Class as a result of an allocation of an Appraisal Reduction Amount in respect of such Class (such Class, an “Appraised-Out Class”) will have the right to challenge the Special Servicer’s Appraisal Reduction Amount determination and, at their sole expense, obtain a second appraisal of any Serviced Loan for which an Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred (such holders, the “Requesting Holders”). The Requesting Holders will be required to cause the appraisal to be prepared on an “as-is” basis by an Appraiser in accordance with MAI standards, and the appraisal must be reasonably acceptable to the Special Servicer in accordance with the Servicing Standard. The Requesting Holders will be required to provide the Special Servicer with notice of their intent to challenge the Special Servicer’s Appraisal Reduction

S-265

Amount determination within 10 days of the Requesting Holders’ receipt of written notice of the Appraisal Reduction Amount.

An Appraised-Out Class will be entitled to continue to exercise the rights of the Controlling Class until 10 days following its receipt of written notice of the Appraisal Reduction Amount, unless the Requesting Holders provide written notice of their intent to challenge such Appraisal Reduction Amount to the Special Servicer and the Certificate Administrator within such ten-day period as described above. If the Requesting Holders provide this notice, then the Appraised-Out Class will be entitled to continue to exercise the rights of the Controlling Class until the earliest of (i) 120 days following the related Appraisal Reduction Event, unless the Requesting Holders provide the second appraisal within such 120-day period, (ii) the determination by the Special Servicer (described below) that a recalculation of the Appraisal Reduction Amount is not warranted or that such recalculation does not result in the Appraised-Out Class remaining the Controlling Class and (iii) the occurrence of a Consultation Termination Event. After the Appraised-Out Class is no longer entitled to exercise the rights of the Controlling Class, the rights of the Controlling Class will be exercised by the Class of Control Eligible Certificates immediately senior to such Appraised-Out Class, if any, unless a recalculation results in the reinstatement of the Appraised-Out Class as the Controlling Class.

In addition, the holders of Certificates representing the majority of the Certificate Principal Amount of any Appraised-Out Class will have the right, at their sole expense, to require the Special Servicer to order an additional appraisal of any Serviced Loan for which an Appraisal Reduction Event has occurred if an event has occurred at or with regard to the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties that would have a material effect on its appraised value, and the Special Servicer is required to use its reasonable best efforts to ensure that such appraisal is delivered within 30 days from receipt of such holders’ written request and is required to ensure that such appraisal is prepared on an “as-is” basis by an Appraiser in accordance with MAI standards; provided that the Special Servicer will not be required to obtain such appraisal if it determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that no events at or with regard to the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties have occurred that would have a material effect on the appraised value of the related Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties.

Upon receipt of an appraisal provided by, or requested by, holders of an Appraised-Out Class as described above and any other information reasonably requested by the Special Servicer from the Master Servicer reasonably required to calculate or recalculate the Appraisal Reduction Amount, the Special Servicer will be required to determine, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, whether, based on its assessment of such additional appraisal, any recalculation of the Appraisal Reduction Amount is warranted and, if so warranted, to recalculate such Appraisal Reduction Amount based upon such additional appraisal. If required by any such recalculation, the Appraised-Out Class will be reinstated as the Controlling Class. The Special Servicer will be required to promptly notify the Certificate Administrator of any such determination and recalculation in its monthly reporting, and the Certificate Administrator will be required to promptly post that reporting to the Certificate Administrator’s website.

Appraisals that are permitted to be presented by, or obtained by the Special Servicer at the request of, holders of an Appraised-Out Class will be in addition to any appraisals that the Special Servicer may otherwise be required to obtain in accordance with the Servicing Standard or the Pooling and Servicing Agreement without regard to any appraisal requests made by any holder of an Appraised-Out Class.

The “Control Eligible Certificates” will be any of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H Certificates.

Voting Rights

The Certificates will be allocated voting rights (the “Voting Rights”) for purposes of certain actions that may be taken pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. At any time that any Certificates are outstanding, the Voting Rights will be allocated as follows: (a) 0% in the case of the Class R Certificates; (b) 1% in the aggregate in the case of the respective Classes of the Class X Certificates, allocated to such Classes based on their respective interest entitlements on the most recent prior Distribution Date; and (c) in the case of any Class of Certificates (other than the Class X and Class R Certificates), a percentage equal to the product of (i) 99% multiplied by (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is equal to the Certificate Principal Amount of such Class and the denominator of which is equal to the aggregate outstanding Certificate Principal Amounts of all Classes of the Certificates (other than the Class X or Class R Certificates) (or, if with respect to a vote of Non-Reduced Certificates, the Certificate Principal Amounts of all Classes of the Non-Reduced Certificates); provided that for

S-266

purposes of such allocations, the Class A-S Certificates and the Class PEZ Component A-S of the Class PEZ Certificates will be considered as if they together constitute a single “Class”, the Class B Certificates and the Class PEZ Component B of the Class PEZ Certificates will be considered as if they together constitute a single “Class”, and the Class C Certificates and the Class PEZ Component C of the Class PEZ Certificates will be considered as if they together constitute a single “Class”. Voting Rights will be allocated to the Class PEZ Certificates only with respect to each Class PEZ Component that is part of a “Class” of Certificates determined as described in the proviso to the preceding sentence. The Voting Rights of any Class of Certificates will be allocated among holders of Certificates of such Class in proportion to their respective Percentage Interests. In certain circumstances described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination of the Special Servicer” and “—Operating Advisor—Termination of the Operating Advisor Without Cause” in this prospectus supplement, Voting Rights will only be exercisable by holders of the Non-Reduced Certificates.

“Non-Reduced Certificates” means, as of any date of determination, any Class of Certificates (other than the Class R and Class X Certificates) then outstanding for which (a) (1) the initial Certificate Principal Amount of such Class of Certificates minus (2) the sum (without duplication) of (x) any payments of principal (whether as principal prepayments or otherwise) previously distributed to the Certificateholders of such Class of Certificates, (y) any Appraisal Reduction Amounts allocated to such Class of Certificates as of the date of determination and (z) any Realized Losses previously allocated to such Class of Certificates, is equal to or greater than (b) 25% of the remainder of (i) the initial Certificate Principal Amount of such Class of Certificates less (ii) any payments of principal (whether as principal prepayments or otherwise) previously distributed to the Certificateholders of such Class of Certificates; provided that for purposes of this definition, the Class A-S Certificates and the Class PEZ Component A-S will be considered as if they together constitute a single “Class” of Certificates, the Class B Certificates and the Class PEZ Component B will be considered as if they together constitute a single “Class” of Certificates, the Class C Certificates and the Class PEZ Component C will be considered as if they together constitute a single “Class” of Certificates, and the Class PEZ Certificates will be Non-Reduced Certificates only with respect to each component thereof that is part of a “Class” of Non-Reduced Certificates determined as described in this proviso.

A “Certificateholder” under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement is the person in whose name a Certificate is registered in the certificate register maintained pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (including, solely for the purposes of distributing reports, statements or other information pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, beneficial owners of Certificates or potential transferees of Certificates to the extent the person distributing such information has been provided with an Investor Certification by or on behalf of such beneficial owner or potential transferee), except that solely for the purpose of giving any consent or taking any action pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, any Certificate beneficially owned by the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Operating Advisor, a manager of a Mortgaged Property, a borrower or any person known to a responsible officer of the Certificate Registrar to be an affiliate of the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Operating Advisor, a manager of a Mortgaged Property or a borrower will be deemed not to be outstanding and the Voting Rights to which they are entitled will not be taken into account in determining whether the requisite percentage of Voting Rights necessary to effect any such consent or take any such action has been obtained (provided, that notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of exercising any rights it may have solely as a member of the Controlling Class, any Controlling Class Certificate owned by an Excluded Controlling Class Holder will be deemed not to be outstanding as to such holder solely with respect to any related Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loan). Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of obtaining the consent of Certificateholders to an amendment of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, any Certificate beneficially owned by the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator or any of their affiliates will be deemed to be outstanding; provided that if such amendment relates to the termination, increase in compensation or material reduction of obligations of the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Operating Advisor or the Certificate Administrator or any of their affiliates, then such Certificate so owned will be deemed not to be outstanding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the restrictions above will not apply (i) to the exercise of the rights of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or an affiliate of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, if any, as a member of the Controlling Class (other than with respect to any Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loan with respect to which such party is an Excluded Controlling Class Holder as described above) or (ii) to any affiliate of the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Operating Advisor or the Certificate Administrator that has provided an Investor Certification in which it has certified as to the existence of certain policies and procedures restricting the flow of information between it and the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Operating Advisor or the Certificate Administrator, as applicable. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing contained in this

S-267

definition will preclude the Special Servicer from performing its duties and exercising its rights in its capacity as Special Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement other than with respect to an Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage Loan.

Certain amendments to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are also subject to the consent of Certificateholders. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Amendment” in this prospectus supplement.

“Investor Certification” means a certificate substantially in the form(s) attached to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or in the form(s) of electronic certification(s) contained on the Certificate Administrator’s website representing that such person executing the certificate is a Certificateholder, a Certificate Owner or a prospective purchaser of a Certificate (or any investment advisor or manager of the foregoing), the Controlling Class Representative (to the extent the Controlling Class Representative is not a Certificateholder or a Certificate Owner), or a Serviced Companion Loan Holder or its representative, and that (i) for purposes of obtaining certain information and notices (including access to information and notices on the Certificate Administrator’s website), (A) (1) such person is not a borrower, a manager of a Mortgaged Property, an affiliate of any of the foregoing or an agent, principal, partner, member, joint venturer, limited partner, employee, representative, director, trustee, advisor or investor in or of any of the foregoing or, in the case of the Controlling Class Representative or any Controlling Class Certificateholder, such person is not a Borrower Party or (2) such person is a Borrower Party as to any identified Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loan and (B) except in the case of a prospective purchaser of a Certificate or a Serviced Companion Loan Holder or its representative, such person has received a copy of this prospectus supplement and the prospectus and/or (ii) for purposes of exercising Voting Rights (which does not apply to a prospective purchaser of a Certificate or a Serviced Companion Loan Holder or its representative), (A) (1) such person is not a Borrower Party or an agent of any borrower or (2) such person is a Borrower Party as to any identified Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loan, (B) such person is or is not the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator or an affiliate of any of the foregoing and (C) such person has received a copy of this prospectus supplement and the prospectus; provided that if such person is an affiliate of the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Trustee or the Certificate Administrator, such person certifies as to whether there exists appropriate policies and procedures restricting the flow of information between it and the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Trustee or the Certificate Administrator, as applicable.

For the avoidance of doubt if a Borrower Party is the Controlling Class Representative or a Controlling Class Certificateholder, such person (A) will be prohibited from having access to the Excluded Information solely with respect to the related Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loan and (B) will not be permitted to exercise voting or control, consultation and/or special servicer appointment rights as a member of the Controlling Class solely with respect to the related Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loan.

Delivery, Form, Transfer and Denomination

The Offered Certificates (other than the Class X-A and Class X-D Certificates) will be issued, maintained and transferred in the book-entry form only in minimum denominations of $10,000 initial Certificate Principal Amount, and in multiples of $1 in excess of $10,000. The Class X-A and Class X-D Certificates will be issued, maintained and transferred only in minimum denominations of authorized initial Notional Amounts of not less than $1,000,000 and in integral multiples of $1 in excess of $1,000,000. However, in connection with an exchange of Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates for Class PEZ Certificates and vice versa, each of the Class A-S, Class B, and Class C Certificates exchanged (whether surrendered or received in such exchange) will be required to be in denominations of at least $10,000 initial Certificate Principal Amount, and the Class PEZ Certificates exchanged will be required to equal the aggregate Certificate Principal Amount of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates being exchanged therefor (i.e. in excess of $30,000 initial Certificate Principal Amount).

The Offered Certificates will initially be represented by one or more global Certificates for each such Class registered in the name of a nominee of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”). The Depositor has been informed by DTC that DTC’s nominee will be Cede & Co. No holder of an Offered Certificate will be entitled to receive a certificate issued in fully registered, certificated form (each, a “Definitive Certificate”) representing its interest in such Class, except under the limited circumstances described under “—Definitive Certificates” below. Unless and until Definitive Certificates are issued, all references to actions by holders of the Offered Certificates will refer to actions taken by DTC upon instructions received from holders of Offered Certificates through its participating organizations (together with Clearstream Banking, société anonyme (“Clearstream”) and Euroclear Bank, as operator of the Euroclear System (“Euroclear”) participating organizations, the “Participants”), and all

S-268

references in this prospectus supplement to payments, notices, reports, statements and other information to holders of Offered Certificates will refer to payments, notices, reports and statements to DTC or Cede & Co., as the registered holder of the Offered Certificates, for distribution to holders of Offered Certificates through its Participants in accordance with DTC procedures; provided, however, that to the extent that the party to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement responsible for distributing any report, statement or other information has been provided in writing with the name of the Certificate Owner of such an Offered Certificate (or the prospective transferee of such Certificate Owner), such report, statement or other information will be provided to such Certificate Owner (or prospective transferee).

Until Definitive Certificates are issued in respect of the Offered Certificates, interests in the Offered Certificates will be transferred on the book-entry records of DTC and its Participants. The Certificate Administrator will initially serve as certificate registrar (in such capacity, the “Certificate Registrar”) for purposes of recording and otherwise providing for the registration of the Offered Certificates.

Book-Entry Registration

Holders of Offered Certificates may hold their Certificates through DTC (in the United States) or Clearstream or Euroclear (in Europe) if they are Participants of such system, or indirectly through organizations that are participants in such systems. Clearstream and Euroclear will hold omnibus positions on behalf of the Clearstream Participants and the Euroclear Participants, respectively, through customers’ securities accounts in Clearstream’s and Euroclear’s names on the books of their respective depositaries (collectively, the “Depositaries”), which in turn will hold such positions in customers’ securities accounts in the Depositaries’ names on the books of DTC. DTC is a limited purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law, a “banking organization” within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code and a “clearing agency” registered pursuant to Section 17A of the Exchange Act. DTC was created to hold securities for its Participants and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities transactions between Participants through electronic computerized book-entries, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates. Participants (“DTC Participants”) include securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies and clearing corporations. Indirect access to the DTC system also is available to others such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Participant, either directly or indirectly (“Indirect Participants”).

Transfers between DTC Participants will occur in accordance with DTC rules. Transfers between Clearstream Participants (as defined below) and Euroclear Participants (as defined below) will occur in accordance with the applicable rules and operating procedures of Clearstream and Euroclear.

Cross-market transfers between persons holding directly or indirectly through DTC, on the one hand, and directly through Clearstream Participants or Euroclear Participants, on the other, will be effected in DTC in accordance with DTC rules on behalf of the relevant European international clearing system by its Depositary; however, such cross-market transactions will require delivery of instructions to the relevant European international clearing system by the counterparty in such system in accordance with its rules and procedures and within its established deadlines (European time). The relevant European international clearing system will, if the transaction meets its settlement requirements, deliver instructions to its Depositary to take action to effect final settlement on its behalf by delivering or receiving securities in DTC, and making or receiving payment in accordance with normal procedures for same-day funds settlement applicable to DTC. Clearstream Participants and Euroclear Participants may not deliver instructions directly to the Depositaries.

Because of time-zone differences, credits of securities in Clearstream or Euroclear as a result of a transaction with a DTC Participant will be made during the subsequent securities settlement processing, dated the business day following the DTC settlement date, and such credits or any transactions in such securities settled during such processing will be reported to the relevant Clearstream Participant or Euroclear Participant on such business day. Cash received in Clearstream or Euroclear as a result of sales of securities by or through a Clearstream Participant or a Euroclear Participant to a DTC Participant will be received with value on the DTC settlement date but will be available in the relevant Clearstream or Euroclear cash account only as of the business day following settlement in DTC.

The holders of Offered Certificates that are not Participants or Indirect Participants but desire to purchase, sell or otherwise transfer ownership of, or other interests in, such Offered Certificates may do so only through

S-269

Participants and Indirect Participants. In addition, holders of Offered Certificates in global form (“Certificate Owners”) will receive all distributions of principal and interest through the Participants who in turn will receive them from DTC. Under a book-entry format, holders of such Offered Certificates may experience some delay in their receipt of payments, since such payments will be forwarded by the Certificate Administrator to Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC. DTC will forward such payments to its Participants, which thereafter will forward them to Indirect Participants or the applicable Certificate Owners. Except as otherwise provided under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Reports to Certificateholders; Available Information” in this prospectus supplement, Certificate Owners will not be recognized by the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Certificate Registrar, the Operating Advisor, the Special Servicer or the Master Servicer as holders of record of Certificates and Certificate Owners will be permitted to receive information furnished to Certificateholders and to exercise the rights of Certificateholders only indirectly through DTC and its Participants and Indirect Participants.

Under the rules, regulations and procedures creating and affecting DTC and its operations (the “Rules”), DTC is required to make book-entry transfers of Offered Certificates in global form among Participants on whose behalf it acts with respect to such Offered Certificates and to receive and transmit distributions of principal of, and interest on, such Offered Certificates. Participants and Indirect Participants with which the Certificate Owners have accounts with respect to the Offered Certificates similarly are required to make book-entry transfers and receive and transmit such payments on behalf of their respective Certificate Owners. Accordingly, although the Certificate Owners will not possess the Offered Certificates, the Rules provide a mechanism by which Certificate Owners will receive payments on Offered Certificates and will be able to transfer their interest.

Because DTC can only act on behalf of Participants, who in turn act on behalf of Indirect Participants and certain banks, the ability of a holder of Offered Certificates in global form to pledge such Offered Certificates to persons or entities that do not participate in the DTC system, or to otherwise act with respect to such Offered Certificates, may be limited due to the lack of a physical certificate for such Offered Certificates.

DTC has advised the Depositor that it will take any action permitted to be taken by a holder of an Offered Certificate under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement only at the direction of one or more Participants to whose accounts with DTC such Certificate is credited. DTC may take conflicting actions with respect to other undivided interests to the extent that such actions are taken on behalf of Participants whose holdings include such undivided interests.

Clearstream is incorporated under the laws of Luxembourg and is a global securities settlement clearing house. Clearstream holds securities for its participating organizations (“Clearstream Participants”) and facilitates the clearance and settlement of securities transactions between Clearstream Participants through electronic book-entry changes in accounts of Clearstream Participants, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates. Transactions may be settled in Clearstream in numerous currencies, including United States dollars. Clearstream provides to its Clearstream Participants, among other things, services for safekeeping, administration, clearance and settlement of internationally traded securities and securities lending and borrowing. Clearstream interfaces with domestic markets in several countries. Clearstream is regulated as a bank by the Luxembourg Monetary Institute. Clearstream Participants are recognized financial institutions around the world, including underwriters, securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other organizations and may include the underwriters. Indirect access to Clearstream is also available to others, such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Clearstream Participant, either directly or indirectly.

Euroclear was created in 1968 to hold securities for participants of the Euroclear system (“Euroclear Participants”) and to clear and settle transactions between Euroclear Participants through simultaneous electronic book-entry delivery against payment, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates and any risk from lack of simultaneous transfers of securities and cash. Transactions may now be settled in any of numerous currencies, including United States dollars. The Euroclear system includes various other services, including securities lending and borrowing and interfaces with domestic markets in several countries generally similar to the arrangements for cross-market transfers with DTC described above. Euroclear is operated by Euroclear Bank S.A./N.V. (the “Euroclear Operator”). All operations are conducted by the Euroclear Operator, and all Euroclear securities clearance accounts and Euroclear cash accounts are accounts with the Euroclear Operator. Euroclear Participants include banks (including central banks), securities brokers and dealers and other professional financial intermediaries and may include the underwriters. Indirect access to the Euroclear system is also available to other firms that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Euroclear Participant, either directly or indirectly.

S-270

Securities clearance accounts and cash accounts with the Euroclear Operator are governed by the Terms and Conditions Governing Use of Euroclear and the related operating procedures of the Euroclear System and applicable Belgian law (collectively, the “Terms and Conditions”). The Terms and Conditions govern transfers of securities and cash within the Euroclear system, withdrawal of securities and cash from the Euroclear system, and receipts of payments with respect to securities in the Euroclear system. All securities in the Euroclear system are held on a fungible basis without attribution of specific certificates to specific securities clearance accounts. The Euroclear Operator acts under the Terms and Conditions only on behalf of Euroclear Participants and has no record of or relationship with persons holding through Euroclear Participants.

Although DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream have implemented the foregoing procedures in order to facilitate transfers of interests in book-entry securities among Participants of DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream, they are under no obligation to perform or to continue to comply with such procedures, and such procedures may be discontinued at any time. None of the Depositor, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the underwriters will have any responsibility for the performance by DTC, Euroclear or Clearstream or their respective direct or indirect Participants of their respective obligations under the rules and procedures governing their operations. The information in this prospectus supplement concerning DTC, Clearstream and Euroclear and their book-entry systems has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but neither the Depositor nor the underwriters takes any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this information.

Definitive Certificates

Owners of beneficial interests in book-entry Certificates of any Class will not be entitled to receive physical delivery of Definitive Certificates unless: (i) DTC advises the Certificate Registrar in writing that DTC is no longer willing or able to discharge properly its responsibilities as depository with respect to the book-entry Certificates of such Class or ceases to be a clearing agency, and the Certificate Administrator and the Depositor are unable to locate a qualified successor within 90 days of such notice or (ii) the Trustee has instituted or has been directed to institute any judicial proceeding to enforce the rights of the Certificateholders of such Class and the Trustee has been advised by counsel that in connection with such proceeding it is necessary or appropriate for the Trustee to obtain possession of the Certificates of such Class.

Certificateholder Communication

Access to Certificateholders’ Names and Addresses

Upon the written request of (a) any Certificateholder or Certificate Owner that has delivered an executed Investor Certification to the Trustee or the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Certificateholder”) or (b) the Master Servicer, the Certificate Registrar will promptly furnish or cause to be furnished to such requesting party a list of the names and addresses of the Certificateholders as of the most recent Record Date as they appear in the certificate register, at the expense of the requesting party.

Special Notices

Upon the written request of any Certifying Certificateholder, the Certificate Administrator will post a special notice prepared by such Certifying Certificateholder to its website and mail such notice to the Certificateholders at their respective addresses appearing on the certificate register stating that the Certifying Certificateholder wishes to be contacted by other holders and beneficial owners of Certificates, setting forth the relevant contact information and briefly stating the reason for the requested contact, at the expense of the Certifying Certificateholder. The Certificate Administrator will be entitled to reimbursement from the Certifying Certificateholder for the reasonable expenses of posting such special notices.

Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations

Yield

The yield to maturity on the Offered Certificates will depend upon the price paid by the related investors, the rate and timing of the distributions in reduction of the Certificate Principal Amount or Notional Amount of the related Class of Offered Certificates, the extent to which prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges allocated to the related Class of Offered Certificates are collected, and the rate, timing and severity of losses on

S-271

the Mortgage Loans and the extent to which such losses are allocable in reduction of the Certificate Principal Amount or Notional Amount of the related Class of Offered Certificates, as well as prevailing interest rates at the time of payment or loss realization.

The rate of distributions in reduction of (or otherwise resulting in the reduction of) the Certificate Principal Amount or Notional Amount of any Class of Offered Certificates, the aggregate amount of distributions on any Class of Offered Certificates and the yield to maturity of any Class of Offered Certificates will be directly related to the rate of payments of principal (both scheduled and unscheduled) on the Mortgage Loans and the amount and timing of borrower defaults and the severity of losses occurring upon a default. While voluntary prepayments of some Mortgage Loans are generally prohibited during applicable prepayment lockout periods, effective prepayments may occur if a sufficiently significant portion of a Mortgaged Property is lost due to casualty or condemnation. See, however, “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Voluntary Prepayments” in this prospectus supplement, for a discussion of certain Mortgage Loans that do not have a lockout period for prepayment. In addition, such distributions in reduction of Certificate Principal Amounts of the respective Classes of Offered Certificates that are also Principal Balance Certificates (or that otherwise result in the reduction of the Notional Amount of the Class X-A or Class X-D Certificates) may result from repurchases of, or substitutions for, Mortgage Loans made by the Sponsors (or, in the case of KGS, by KGS Holdings or, in the case of RAIT, by RFT) due to missing or defective documentation or breaches of representations and warranties with respect to the Mortgage Loans as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Representations and Warranties” and “—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions” in this prospectus supplement, purchases of the Mortgage Loans in the manner described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Optional Termination; Optional Mortgage Loan Purchase” in this prospectus supplement, the exercise of purchase options by the holder of a subordinate companion loan or mezzanine loan, if any. To the extent a Mortgage Loan requires payment of a prepayment premium or yield maintenance charge in connection with a voluntary prepayment, any such prepayment premium or yield maintenance charge generally is not due in connection with a prepayment due to casualty or condemnation, is not included in the purchase price of a Mortgage Loan purchased or repurchased due to a breach of a representation or warranty or otherwise, and may not be enforceable or collectible upon a default.

The Certificate Principal Amount or Notional Amount of any Class of Offered Certificates may be reduced without distributions of principal as a result of the occurrence and allocation of Realized Losses, reducing the maximum amount distributable in respect of principal on the Offered Certificates that are Principal Balance Certificates as well as the amount of interest that would have accrued on the Offered Certificates in the absence of such reduction. In general, a Realized Loss occurs when the principal balance of a Mortgage Loan is reduced without an equal distribution to applicable Certificateholders in reduction of the Certificate Principal Amounts of the Principal Balance Certificates (other than the Exchangeable Certificates) and the Trust Components (and, therefore, the Exchangeable Certificates). Realized Losses may occur in connection with a default on a Mortgage Loan, acceptance of a discounted payoff, the liquidation of the related Mortgaged Properties, a reduction in the principal balance of a Mortgage Loan by a bankruptcy court or pursuant to a modification, a recovery by the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Trustee of a Non-Recoverable Advance on a Distribution Date or the incurrence of certain unanticipated or default-related costs and expenses (including interest on Advances, Workout Fees, Liquidation Fees and Special Servicing Fees and any comparable items with respect to the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans). Any reduction of the Certificate Principal Amount of a Class of Principal Balance Certificates (exclusive of the Exchangeable Certificates) or a Trust Component (and, therefore, the applicable Classes of Exchangeable Certificates) as a result of the application of Realized Losses may also reduce the Notional Amount of a Class of Class X Certificates. Realized Losses will be allocated to the respective Classes of the Principal Balance Certificates (other than the Exchangeable Certificates) and the Trust Components (and, therefore, the Exchangeable Certificates) in reverse distribution priority and as more particularly described in “Description of the Offered Certificates—Subordination” in this prospectus supplement.

Certificateholders are not entitled to receive distributions of Monthly Payments when due except to the extent they are either covered by an Advance or actually received. Consequently, any defaulted Monthly Payment for which no such Advance is made will tend to extend the weighted average lives of the Offered Certificates, whether or not a permitted extension of the due date of the related Mortgage Loan has been completed.

The rate of payments (including voluntary and involuntary prepayments) on the Mortgage Loans will be influenced by a variety of economic, geographic, social and other factors, including the level of mortgage interest rates and the rate at which borrowers default on their Mortgage Loans. The terms of the Mortgage Loans (in particular, amortization terms, the term of any prepayment lock-out period, the extent to which prepayment

S-272

premiums or yield maintenance charges are due with respect to any principal prepayments, the right of the mortgagee to apply condemnation and casualty proceeds or reserve funds to prepay the Mortgage Loan, the extent to which a partial principal prepayment is required in connection with the release of a portion of the real estate collateral for a Mortgage Loan, and the availability of certain rights to defease all or a portion of the Mortgage Loan) may affect the rate of principal payments on Mortgage Loans, and consequently, the yield to maturity of the Classes of Offered Certificates. For example, certain Mortgage Loans may permit prepayment of the Mortgage Loan without a lockout period. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Terms of the Mortgage Loans—Voluntary Prepayments” in this prospectus supplement and Annex A to this prospectus supplement for a description of prepayment lock-out periods, prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges.

Principal prepayments on the Mortgage Loans could also affect the yield on any Class of Offered Certificates with (or the yield on the Class PEZ Certificates if any Trust Component has) a Pass-Through Rate that is limited by, based upon or equal to the WAC Rate. The Pass-Through Rates on those Classes of Offered Certificates and Trust Components may be adversely affected as a result of a decrease in the WAC Rate even if principal prepayments do not occur.

With respect to the Class A-AB Certificates, the extent to which the Class A-AB Scheduled Principal Balances are achieved and the sensitivity of the Class A-AB Certificates to principal prepayments on the Mortgage Loans will depend in part on the period of time during which the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3 and Class A-4 Certificates remain outstanding. In particular, once such other Classes of Offered Certificates are no longer outstanding, any remaining portion on any Distribution Date of the Principal Distribution Amount will be distributed to the Class A-AB Certificates until the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class A-AB Certificates is reduced to zero. As such, the Class A-AB Certificates will become more sensitive to the rate of prepayments on the Mortgage Loans than they were when the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3 and Class A-4 Certificates were outstanding.

Any changes in the weighted average lives of your Certificates may adversely affect your yield. The timing of changes in the rate of prepayment on the Mortgage Loans may significantly affect the actual yield to maturity experienced by an investor even if the average rate of principal payments experienced over time is consistent with such investor’s expectation. In general, the earlier a prepayment of principal on the Mortgage Loans, the greater the effect on such investor’s yield to maturity. As a result, the effect on such investor’s yield of principal payments occurring at a rate higher (or lower) than the rate anticipated by the investor during the period immediately following the issuance of the Offered Certificates would not be fully offset by a subsequent like reduction (or increase) in the rate of principal payments.

In addition, the rate and timing of delinquencies, defaults, the application of other involuntary payments such as condemnation proceeds or insurance proceeds, losses and other shortfalls on Mortgage Loans will affect distributions on the Offered Certificates and their timing. See “Risk Factors—Your Yield May Be Affected by Defaults, Prepayments and Other Factors” in this prospectus supplement. In general, these factors may be influenced by economic and other factors that cannot be predicted with any certainty. Accordingly, you may find it difficult to predict the effect that these factors might have on the yield to maturity of your Offered Certificates.

In addition, if the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Trustee is reimbursed out of general collections on the Mortgage Loans included in the Issuing Entity for any advance that it has determined is not recoverable out of collections on the related Mortgage Loan, then to the extent that this reimbursement is made from collections of principal on the Mortgage Loans in the Issuing Entity, that reimbursement will reduce the amount of principal available to be distributed on the Principal Balance Certificates (exclusive of the Exchangeable Certificates) and Trust Components (and, therefore, the Exchangeable Certificates) and will result in a reduction of the Certificate Principal Amount of a Class of Principal Balance Certificates (exclusive of the Exchangeable Certificates) or Trust Component (and, therefore, the applicable Classes of Exchangeable Certificates). See “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions” in this prospectus supplement. Likewise, if the Master Servicer or the Trustee is reimbursed out of principal collections on the Mortgage Loans for any workout delayed reimbursement amounts, that reimbursement will reduce the amount of principal available to be distributed on the Principal Balance Certificates (exclusive of the Exchangeable Certificates) or Trust Components (and, therefore, the Exchangeable Certificates) on that Distribution Date. This reimbursement would have the effect of reducing current payments of principal on the Offered Certificates that are Principal Balance Certificates and extending the weighted average lives of the respective Classes of those Offered Certificates. See “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions” in this prospectus supplement.

S-273

If you own Offered Certificates that are Principal Balance Certificates, then prepayments resulting in a shortening of the weighted average lives of your Certificates may be made at a time of low interest rates when you may be unable to reinvest the resulting payments of principal on your Certificates at a rate comparable to the effective yield anticipated by you in making your investment in the Offered Certificates, while delays and extensions resulting in a lengthening of the weighted average lives may occur at a time of high interest rates when you may have been able to reinvest principal payments that would otherwise have been received by you at higher rates.

No representation is made as to the rate of principal payments on the Mortgage Loans or as to the yield to maturity of any Class of Offered Certificates. An investor is urged to make an investment decision with respect to any Class of Offered Certificates based on the anticipated yield to maturity of such Class of Offered Certificates resulting from its purchase price and such investor’s own determination as to anticipated Mortgage Loan prepayment rates under a variety of scenarios. The extent to which any Class of Offered Certificates is purchased at a discount or a premium and the degree to which the timing of payments on such Class of Offered Certificates is sensitive to prepayments will determine the extent to which the yield to maturity of such Class of Offered Certificates may vary from the anticipated yield. An investor should carefully consider the associated risks, including, in the case of any Offered Certificates purchased at a discount, the risk that a slower than anticipated rate of principal payments on the Mortgage Loans could result in an actual yield to such investor that is lower than the anticipated yield and, in the case of any Offered Certificates purchased at a premium, the risk that a faster than anticipated rate of principal payments on the Mortgage Loans could result in an actual yield to such investor that is lower than the anticipated yield.

In general, with respect to any Class of Offered Certificates that is purchased at a premium, if principal distributions occur at a rate faster than anticipated at the time of purchase, the investor’s actual yield to maturity will be lower than that assumed at the time of purchase. Conversely, if a Class of Offered Certificates is purchased at a discount and principal distributions occur at a rate slower than that assumed at the time of purchase, the investor’s actual yield to maturity will be lower than that assumed at the time of purchase.

An investor should consider the risk that rapid rates of prepayments on the Mortgage Loans, and therefore of amounts distributable in reduction of the Certificate Principal Amounts of the Offered Certificates that are Principal Balance Certificates may coincide with periods of low prevailing interest rates. During such periods, the effective interest rates on securities in which an investor may choose to reinvest such amounts distributed to it may be lower than the applicable Pass-Through Rate. Conversely, slower rates of prepayments on the Mortgage Loans, and therefore, of amounts distributable in reduction of the Certificate Principal Amounts of the Offered Certificates that are Principal Balance Certificates may coincide with periods of high prevailing interest rates. During such periods, the amount of principal distributions resulting from prepayments available to an investor in any Offered Certificates that are Principal Balance Certificates for reinvestment at such high prevailing interest rates may be relatively small.

The effective yield to holders of Offered Certificates will be lower than the yield otherwise produced by the applicable Pass-Through Rate and applicable purchase prices because while interest will accrue during each Interest Accrual Period, the distribution of such interest will not be made until the Distribution Date immediately following such Interest Accrual Period, and principal paid on any Distribution Date will not bear interest during the period from the end of such Interest Accrual Period to the Distribution Date that follows.

In addition, although the related borrower under any ARD Loan may have certain incentives to prepay such ARD Loan on its Anticipated Repayment Date, we cannot assure you that such borrower will be able to prepay such ARD Loan on its Anticipated Repayment Date. The failure of the related borrower to prepay an ARD Loan on its Anticipated Repayment Date will not be an event of default under the terms of such ARD Loan, and pursuant to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, neither the Master Servicer nor the Special Servicer will be permitted to take any enforcement action with respect to such borrower’s failure to pay Excess Interest, other than requests for collection, until the scheduled maturity of such ARD Loan; provided that the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, may take action to enforce the Issuing Entity’s right to apply excess cash flow to principal in accordance with the terms of the related ARD Loan documents.

Yield on the Class X-A and Class X-D Certificates

The yield to maturity of the Class X-A Certificates will be highly sensitive to the rate and timing of reductions made to the Certificate Principal Amounts of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB

S-274

Certificates and the Class A-S Trust Component, including by reason of prepayments and principal losses on the Mortgage Loans and other factors described above. The yield to maturity of the Class X-D Certificates will be highly sensitive to the rate and timing of reductions made to the Certificate Principal Amount of the Class D Certificates, including by reason of prepayments and principal losses on the Mortgage Loans and other factors described above. Investors in the Class X-A and Class X-D Certificates should fully consider the associated risks, including the risk that an extremely rapid rate of prepayment or other liquidation of the Mortgage Loans could result in the failure of such investors to recoup fully their initial investments.

Any optional termination by the holders of the Controlling Class, the Special Servicer, the Master Servicer or the holders of the Class R Certificates would result in prepayment in full of the Certificates and would have an adverse effect on the yield of the Class X-A and/or Class X-D Certificates because a termination would have an effect similar to a principal prepayment in full of the Mortgage Loans and, as a result, investors in the Class X-A Certificates, the Class X-D Certificates and any other certificates purchased at premium might not fully recoup their initial investment. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Optional Termination; Optional Mortgage Loan Purchase” in this prospectus supplement.

Weighted Average Life of the Offered Certificates

Weighted average life refers to the average amount of time from the date of issuance of a security until each dollar of principal of such security will be repaid to the investor (or, in the case of a Class X-A or Class X-D Certificate, each dollar of its Notional Amount is reduced to zero). The weighted average lives of the Offered Certificates will be influenced by the rate at which principal payments (including scheduled payments, principal prepayments and payments made pursuant to any applicable policies of insurance) on the Mortgage Loans are made. Principal payments on the Mortgage Loans may be in the form of scheduled amortization or prepayments (for this purpose, the term prepayment includes prepayments, partial prepayments and liquidations due to a default or other dispositions of the Mortgage Loans).

Calculations reflected in the following tables assume that the Mortgage Loans have the characteristics shown on Annex A (together with the footnotes thereto) to this prospectus supplement, and are based on the following additional assumptions (“Modeling Assumptions”): (i) each Mortgage Loan is assumed to prepay at the indicated level of constant prepayment rate (“CPR”), in accordance with a prepayment scenario in which prepayments occur after expiration of any applicable lock-out period, defeasance and/or yield maintenance options or fixed prepayment premiums, (ii) there are no delinquencies, (iii) scheduled interest and principal payments, including balloon payments, on the Mortgage Loans are timely received on their respective Due Dates, (iv) no prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges are collected, (v) there are no property releases requiring payment of yield maintenance charge or other prepayment premium, (vi) no party exercises its right of optional termination of the Issuing Entity described in this prospectus supplement, (vii) no Mortgage Loan is required to be repurchased from the Issuing Entity, (viii) the Administrative Fee Rate is the respective rate set forth on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as the “Administrative Fee Rate” with respect to such Mortgage Loan, (ix) there are no Excess Prepayment Interest Shortfalls, other shortfalls unrelated to defaults or Appraisal Reduction Amounts allocated to any class of Certificates, (x) distributions on the Certificates are made on the tenth day (each assumed to be a business day) of each month, commencing in October 2015, (xi) the Certificates will be issued on September 29, 2015, (xii) the Pass-Through Rate with respect to each Class of Offered Certificates (exclusive of the Class PEZ Certificates) and Trust Component is as described under “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions—Payment Priorities” in this prospectus supplement, (xiii) the ARD Loans (if any) prepay in full on their respective Anticipated Repayment Dates, (xiv) all prepayments are assumed to be voluntary prepayments and will not include, without limitation, Liquidation Proceeds, condemnation proceeds, insurance proceeds, proceeds from the purchase of a Mortgage Loan from the Issuing Entity or any prepayment that is accepted by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer pursuant to a workout, settlement or loan modification, (xv) each Class of Exchangeable Certificates is issued at its respective maximum initial Certificate Principal Amount, (xvi) the initial Certificate Principal Amounts or Notional Amounts of the Certificates and Trust Components (or, in the case of the Exchangeable Certificates, the maximum Certificate Principal Amounts of such Certificates) are as set forth in the table (together with the footnotes thereto) under “Certificate Summary” of this prospectus supplement, and (xvii) no Exchangeable Certificates have been exchanged, except with respect to the decrement table and price/yield table below and the expected final distribution date (set forth in the Summary to this prospectus supplement) relating to the Class PEZ Certificates, in which case we assume that the maximum Certificate Principal Amount of the Class PEZ Certificates was issued on the Closing Date.

S-275

The weighted average life of any Offered Certificate refers to the average amount of time that will elapse from the date of its issuance until each dollar allocable to principal of such Offered Certificate is distributed to the investor (or, in the case of a Class X-A or Class X-D Certificate, each dollar of its Notional Amount is reduced to zero). The weighted average life of any Offered Certificate will be influenced by, among other things, the rate at which principal on the Mortgage Loans is paid or otherwise collected or advanced and applied to pay principal (or, in the case of a Class X-A or Class X-D Certificate, reduce the Notional Amount) of such Offered Certificate. The Principal Distribution Amount for each Distribution Date will be distributable as described in “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions—Payment Priorities” in this prospectus supplement.

The following tables indicate the percentage of the initial Certificate Principal Amount of each Class of Offered Certificates (other than the Class X-A and Class X-D Certificates) that would be outstanding after each of the dates shown under each of the indicated prepayment assumptions and the corresponding weighted average life, first principal payment date and last principal payment date of each such Class of Offered Certificates. The tables have been prepared on the basis of, among others, the Modeling Assumptions. To the extent that the Mortgage Loans or the Certificates have characteristics that differ from those assumed in preparing the tables, the respective Classes of the Offered Certificates that are Principal Balance Certificates may mature earlier or later than indicated by the tables. The Mortgage Loans will not prepay at any constant rate, and it is highly unlikely that the Mortgage Loans will prepay in a manner consistent with the assumptions described in this prospectus supplement. For this reason and because the timing of principal payments is critical to determining weighted average lives, the weighted average lives of the applicable Offered Certificates are likely to differ from those shown in the tables, even if all of the Mortgage Loans prepay at the indicated percentages of CPR or prepayment scenario over any given time period or over the entire life of the Offered Certificates. In addition, variations in the actual prepayment experience and the balance of the Mortgage Loans that prepay may increase or decrease the percentages of initial Certificate Principal Amount (and shorten or extend the weighted average lives) shown in the following tables. Investors are urged to conduct their own analyses of the rates at which the Mortgage Loans may be expected to prepay.

Percentages of the Initial Certificate Principal Amount of
the Class A-1 Certificates at the Specified CPRs
0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance
or fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR

	Prepayment Assumption (CPR)
Distribution Date	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
Closing Date	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2016	87%	87%	87%	87%	87%
September 10, 2017	72%	72%	72%	72%	72%
September 10, 2018	51%	51%	51%	51%	51%
September 10, 2019	24%	24%	24%	24%	24%
September 10, 2020 and thereafter	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Weighted Average Life (in years)	2.83	2.82	2.82	2.82	2.81
First Principal Payment Date	October 2015	October 2015	October 2015	October 2015	October 2015
Last Principal Payment Date	August 2020	June 2020	June 2020	May 2020	April 2020

Percentages of the Initial Certificate Principal Amount of
the Class A-2 Certificates at the Specified CPRs
0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance
or fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR

	Prepayment Assumption (CPR)
Distribution Date	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
Closing Date	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2016	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2017	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2018	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2019	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2020 and thereafter	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Weighted Average Life (in years)	4.86	4.86	4.84	4.82	4.61
First Principal Payment Date	August 2020	June 2020	June 2020	May 2020	April 2020
Last Principal Payment Date	August 2020	August 2020	August 2020	August 2020	August 2020

S-276

Percentages of the Initial Certificate Principal Amount of
the Class A-3 Certificates at the Specified CPRs
0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or
fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR

	Prepayment Assumption (CPR)
Distribution Date	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
Closing Date	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2016	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2017	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2018	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2019	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2020	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2021	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2022	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2023	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2024	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2025 and thereafter	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Weighted Average Life (in years)	9.83	9.77	9.70	9.62	9.39
First Principal Payment Date	July 2025	January 2025	January 2025	January 2025	January 2025
Last Principal Payment Date	August 2025	August 2025	August 2025	July 2025	April 2025

Percentages of the Initial Certificate Principal Amount of
the Class A-4 Certificates at the Specified CPRs
0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or
fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR 

	Prepayment Assumption (CPR)
Distribution Date	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
Closing Date	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2016	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2017	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2018	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2019	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2020	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2021	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2022	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2023	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2024	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2025 and thereafter	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Weighted Average Life (in years)	9.87	9.87	9.86	9.84	9.61
First Principal Payment Date	August 2025	August 2025	August 2025	July 2025	April 2025
Last Principal Payment Date	September 2025	September 2025	August 2025	August 2025	June 2025

Percentages of the Initial Certificate Principal Amount of
the Class A-AB Certificates at the Specified CPRs
0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or
fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR

	Prepayment Assumption (CPR)
Distribution Date	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
Closing Date	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2016	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2017	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2018	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2019	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2020	99%	99%	99%	99%	99%
September 10, 2021	81%	81%	81%	81%	81%
September 10, 2022	60%	60%	60%	60%	60%
September 10, 2023	39%	39%	39%	39%	39%
September 10, 2024	17%	17%	17%	17%	17%
September 10, 2025 and thereafter	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Weighted Average Life (in years)	7.44	7.44	7.44	7.44	7.44
First Principal Payment Date	August 2020	August 2020	August 2020	August 2020	August 2020
Last Principal Payment Date	July 2025	July 2025	July 2025	July 2025	June 2025

S-277

Percentages of the Initial Certificate Principal Amount of
the Class A-S Certificates at the Specified CPRs
0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or
fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR

	Prepayment Assumption (CPR)
Distribution Date	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
Closing Date	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2016	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2017	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2018	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2019	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2020	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2021	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2022	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2023	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2024	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2025 and thereafter	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Weighted Average Life (in years)	9.95	9.95	9.94	9.87	9.70
First Principal Payment Date	September 2025	September 2025	August 2025	August 2025	June 2025
Last Principal Payment Date	September 2025	September 2025	September 2025	September 2025	June 2025

Percentages of the Initial Certificate Principal Amount of
the Class B Certificates at the Specified CPRs
0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or
fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR 

	Prepayment Assumption (CPR)
Distribution Date	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
Closing Date	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2016	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2017	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2018	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2019	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2020	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2021	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2022	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2023	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2024	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2025 and thereafter	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Weighted Average Life (in years)	9.95	9.95	9.95	9.95	9.70
First Principal Payment Date	September 2025	September 2025	September 2025	September 2025	June 2025
Last Principal Payment Date	September 2025	September 2025	September 2025	September 2025	June 2025

Percentages of the Initial Certificate Principal Amount of
the Class PEZ Certificates at the Specified CPRs
0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or
fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR

	Prepayment Assumption (CPR)
Distribution Date	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
Closing Date	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2016	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2017	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2018	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2019	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2020	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2021	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2022	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2023	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2024	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2025 and thereafter	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Weighted Average Life (in years)	9.95	9.95	9.94	9.92	9.70
First Principal Payment Date	September 2025	September 2025	August 2025	August 2025	June 2025
Last Principal Payment Date	September 2025	September 2025	September 2025	September 2025	June 2025

S-278

Percentages of the Initial Certificate Principal Amount of
the Class C Certificates at the Specified CPRs
0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or
fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR

	Prepayment Assumption (CPR)
Distribution Date	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
Closing Date	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2016	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2017	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2018	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2019	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2020	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2021	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2022	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2023	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2024	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2025 and thereafter	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Weighted Average Life (in years)	9.95	9.95	9.95	9.95	9.70
First Principal Payment Date	September 2025	September 2025	September 2025	September 2025	June 2025
Last Principal Payment Date	September 2025	September 2025	September 2025	September 2025	June 2025

Percentages of the Initial Certificate Principal Amount of
the Class D Certificates at the Specified CPRs
0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or
fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR

	Prepayment Assumption (CPR)
Distribution Date	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
Closing Date	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2016	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2017	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2018	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2019	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2020	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2021	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2022	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2023	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2024	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
September 10, 2025 and thereafter	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%
Weighted Average Life (in years)	9.95	9.95	9.95	9.95	9.71
First Principal Payment Date	September 2025	September 2025	September 2025	September 2025	June 2025
Last Principal Payment Date	September 2025	September 2025	September 2025	September 2025	July 2025

S-279

Price/Yield Tables

The tables set forth below show the corporate bond equivalent (“CBE”) yield with respect to each Class of Offered Certificates under the Modeling Assumptions. Purchase prices set forth below for each Class of Offered Certificates are expressed in 32nds and interpreted as a percentage (i.e., 100-12 is 100-12/32%) of the initial Certificate Principal Amount or Notional Amount, as applicable, of such Class of Offered Certificates, before adding accrued interest.

The yields set forth in the following tables were calculated by determining the monthly discount rates which, when applied to the assumed stream of cash flows to be paid on each Class of Offered Certificates, would cause the discounted present value of such assumed stream of cash flows as of the Closing Date to equal the assumed purchase prices, plus accrued interest at the applicable Pass-Through Rate as described in the Modeling Assumptions, from and including September 1, 2015 to but excluding the Closing Date, and converting such monthly rates to semi-annual corporate bond equivalent rates. Such calculation does not take into account variations that may occur in the interest rates at which investors may be able to reinvest funds received by them as reductions of the Certificate Principal Amounts of the respective Classes of Offered Certificates that are Principal Balance Certificates and consequently does not purport to reflect the return on any investment in such Classes of Offered Certificates when such reinvestment rates are considered.

Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class A-1 Certificates at the Specified CPRs

	0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR
Assumed Price (32nds)	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
95-00	3.534%	3.537%	3.538%	3.539%	3.542%
96-00	3.143%	3.145%	3.146%	3.147%	3.149%
97-00	2.757%	2.759%	2.759%	2.760%	2.762%
98-00	2.377%	2.378%	2.379%	2.379%	2.380%
99-00	2.003%	2.003%	2.003%	2.004%	2.004%
100-00	1.634%	1.634%	1.634%	1.634%	1.634%
101-00	1.270%	1.269%	1.269%	1.269%	1.268%
102-00	0.911%	0.910%	0.909%	0.909%	0.908%
103-00	0.557%	0.556%	0.555%	0.554%	0.552%
104-00	0.208%	0.206%	0.205%	0.204%	0.202%
105-00	-0.136%	-0.139%	-0.140%	-0.141%	-0.144%

Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class A-2 Certificates at the Specified CPRs

	0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR
Assumed Price (32nds)	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
95-00	4.098%	4.100%	4.103%	4.108%	4.156%
96-00	3.863%	3.864%	3.866%	3.871%	3.908%
97-00	3.630%	3.631%	3.633%	3.636%	3.663%
98-00	3.400%	3.400%	3.402%	3.404%	3.422%
99-00	3.172%	3.173%	3.173%	3.174%	3.183%
100-00	2.948%	2.948%	2.948%	2.948%	2.947%
101-00	2.725%	2.725%	2.725%	2.723%	2.713%
102-00	2.506%	2.505%	2.504%	2.502%	2.483%
103-00	2.289%	2.288%	2.286%	2.283%	2.255%
104-00	2.074%	2.073%	2.070%	2.066%	2.029%
105-00	1.861%	1.860%	1.857%	1.852%	1.806%

S-280

Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class A-3 Certificates at the Specified CPRs

	0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR
Assumed Price (32nds)	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
95-00	4.159%	4.162%	4.166%	4.171%	4.184%
96-00	4.031%	4.033%	4.036%	4.039%	4.050%
97-00	3.903%	3.905%	3.907%	3.910%	3.917%
98-00	3.777%	3.778%	3.780%	3.782%	3.787%
99-00	3.653%	3.654%	3.654%	3.655%	3.657%
100-00	3.530%	3.530%	3.530%	3.530%	3.530%
101-00	3.409%	3.408%	3.407%	3.406%	3.403%
102-00	3.289%	3.287%	3.286%	3.284%	3.279%
103-00	3.170%	3.168%	3.166%	3.163%	3.155%
104-00	3.053%	3.050%	3.047%	3.044%	3.033%
105-00	2.937%	2.934%	2.930%	2.926%	2.913%

Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class A-4 Certificates at the Specified CPRs

	0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR
Assumed Price (32nds)	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
95-00	4.432%	4.432%	4.432%	4.433%	4.446%
96-00	4.301%	4.302%	4.302%	4.303%	4.313%
97-00	4.173%	4.173%	4.173%	4.174%	4.181%
98-00	4.046%	4.046%	4.046%	4.046%	4.051%
99-00	3.920%	3.920%	3.920%	3.920%	3.923%
100-00	3.796%	3.796%	3.796%	3.796%	3.796%
101-00	3.674%	3.674%	3.674%	3.673%	3.671%
102-00	3.553%	3.552%	3.552%	3.552%	3.547%
103-00	3.433%	3.433%	3.432%	3.432%	3.424%
104-00	3.314%	3.314%	3.314%	3.313%	3.303%
105-00	3.197%	3.197%	3.197%	3.196%	3.183%

Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class A-AB Certificates at the Specified CPRs

	0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR
Assumed Price (32nds)	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
95-00	4.337%	4.337%	4.337%	4.337%	4.337%
96-00	4.172%	4.172%	4.172%	4.172%	4.172%
97-00	4.010%	4.010%	4.010%	4.010%	4.010%
98-00	3.849%	3.849%	3.849%	3.849%	3.849%
99-00	3.691%	3.691%	3.691%	3.691%	3.691%
100-00	3.534%	3.534%	3.534%	3.534%	3.534%
101-00	3.379%	3.379%	3.379%	3.379%	3.379%
102-00	3.227%	3.227%	3.227%	3.227%	3.227%
103-00	3.075%	3.075%	3.075%	3.075%	3.075%
104-00	2.926%	2.926%	2.926%	2.926%	2.926%
105-00	2.778%	2.778%	2.778%	2.778%	2.778%

S-281

Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class X-A Certificates at the Specified CPRs

	0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR
Assumed Price (32nds)	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
6-00	9.543%	9.502%	9.450%	9.379%	9.031%
6-08	8.480%	8.437%	8.384%	8.311%	7.951%
6-16	7.482%	7.438%	7.383%	7.308%	6.938%
6-24	6.543%	6.498%	6.441%	6.364%	5.983%
7-00	5.656%	5.610%	5.552%	5.472%	5.082%
7-08	4.817%	4.770%	4.710%	4.629%	4.228%
7-16	4.021%	3.973%	3.912%	3.828%	3.419%
7-24	3.265%	3.215%	3.153%	3.068%	2.649%
8-00	2.544%	2.494%	2.430%	2.343%	1.916%
8-08	1.857%	1.805%	1.740%	1.652%	1.216%
8-16	1.200%	1.147%	1.081%	0.991%	0.547%

Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class A-S Certificates at the Specified CPRs

	0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR
Assumed Price (32nds)	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
95-00	4.779%	4.779%	4.780%	4.783%	4.792%
96-00	4.647%	4.647%	4.648%	4.651%	4.658%
97-00	4.517%	4.517%	4.518%	4.520%	4.525%
98-00	4.389%	4.389%	4.389%	4.390%	4.394%
99-00	4.262%	4.262%	4.262%	4.263%	4.264%
100-00	4.137%	4.137%	4.137%	4.136%	4.136%
101-00	4.013%	4.013%	4.013%	4.012%	4.010%
102-00	3.890%	3.890%	3.890%	3.889%	3.885%
103-00	3.769%	3.769%	3.769%	3.767%	3.761%
104-00	3.650%	3.650%	3.649%	3.646%	3.639%
105-00	3.531%	3.531%	3.531%	3.527%	3.518%

Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class B Certificates at the Specified CPRs

	0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR
Assumed Price (32nds)	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
95-00	5.328%	5.328%	5.328%	5.327%	5.341%
96-00	5.192%	5.192%	5.192%	5.192%	5.203%
97-00	5.059%	5.059%	5.059%	5.059%	5.066%
98-00	4.927%	4.927%	4.927%	4.927%	4.932%
99-00	4.796%	4.796%	4.796%	4.796%	4.799%
100-00	4.668%	4.668%	4.668%	4.668%	4.667%
101-00	4.541%	4.540%	4.540%	4.540%	4.538%
102-00	4.415%	4.415%	4.415%	4.415%	4.410%
103-00	4.291%	4.291%	4.291%	4.291%	4.283%
104-00	4.168%	4.168%	4.168%	4.168%	4.158%
105-00	4.047%	4.047%	4.047%	4.046%	4.034%

S-282

Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class PEZ Certificates at the Specified CPRs

	0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR
Assumed Price (32nds)	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
95-00	5.155%	5.155%	5.155%	5.157%	5.168%
96-00	5.021%	5.021%	5.021%	5.022%	5.031%
97-00	4.888%	4.888%	4.888%	4.889%	4.896%
98-00	4.757%	4.757%	4.757%	4.758%	4.762%
99-00	4.628%	4.628%	4.628%	4.629%	4.630%
100-00	4.500%	4.500%	4.500%	4.501%	4.500%
101-00	4.374%	4.374%	4.374%	4.374%	4.371%
102-00	4.250%	4.250%	4.250%	4.250%	4.244%
103-00	4.126%	4.126%	4.126%	4.126%	4.118%
104-00	4.005%	4.005%	4.005%	4.004%	3.994%
105-00	3.884%	3.884%	3.884%	3.884%	3.871%

Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class C Certificates at the Specified CPRs

	0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR
Assumed Price (32nds)	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
95-00	5.328%	5.328%	5.328%	5.327%	5.341%
96-00	5.192%	5.192%	5.192%	5.192%	5.203%
97-00	5.059%	5.059%	5.059%	5.059%	5.066%
98-00	4.927%	4.927%	4.927%	4.927%	4.932%
99-00	4.796%	4.796%	4.796%	4.796%	4.799%
100-00	4.668%	4.668%	4.668%	4.668%	4.667%
101-00	4.541%	4.540%	4.540%	4.540%	4.538%
102-00	4.415%	4.415%	4.415%	4.415%	4.410%
103-00	4.291%	4.291%	4.291%	4.291%	4.283%
104-00	4.168%	4.168%	4.168%	4.168%	4.158%
105-00	4.047%	4.047%	4.047%	4.046%	4.034%

Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class D Certificates at the Specified CPRs

	0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR
Assumed Price (32nds)	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
70-00	7.554%	7.554%	7.554%	7.554%	7.643%
71-00	7.374%	7.374%	7.374%	7.374%	7.461%
72-00	7.198%	7.198%	7.198%	7.198%	7.281%
73-00	7.025%	7.025%	7.025%	7.025%	7.104%
74-00	6.854%	6.854%	6.854%	6.854%	6.930%
75-00	6.686%	6.686%	6.686%	6.686%	6.758%
76-00	6.521%	6.521%	6.521%	6.521%	6.590%
77-00	6.358%	6.358%	6.358%	6.358%	6.424%
78-00	6.198%	6.198%	6.198%	6.198%	6.260%
79-00	6.040%	6.040%	6.040%	6.040%	6.099%
80-00	5.885%	5.885%	5.885%	5.885%	5.941%

S-283

Pre-Tax Yield to Maturity (CBE) for the Class X-D Certificates at the Specified CPRs

	0% CPR during lockout, defeasance and/or yield maintenance or fixed prepayment premiums - otherwise at indicated CPR
Assumed Price (32nds)	0% CPR	25% CPR	50% CPR	75% CPR	100% CPR
9-24	8.726%	8.726%	8.725%	8.724%	8.343%
10-00	8.121%	8.120%	8.120%	8.119%	7.730%
10-08	7.538%	7.538%	7.537%	7.536%	7.141%
10-16	6.977%	6.977%	6.976%	6.975%	6.572%
10-24	6.435%	6.435%	6.435%	6.433%	6.024%
11-00	5.913%	5.912%	5.912%	5.910%	5.494%
11-08	5.407%	5.407%	5.406%	5.405%	4.983%
11-16	4.918%	4.918%	4.918%	4.916%	4.488%
11-24	4.445%	4.445%	4.444%	4.443%	4.008%
12-00	3.987%	3.986%	3.986%	3.984%	3.544%
12-08	3.542%	3.542%	3.541%	3.540%	3.093%

We cannot assure you that the Mortgage Loans will prepay at any particular rate. Moreover, the various remaining terms to maturity of the Mortgage Loans could produce slower or faster principal distributions than indicated in the preceding tables at the various percentages of CPR specified, even if the weighted average remaining term to maturity of the Mortgage Loans is as assumed. Investors are urged to make their investment decisions based on their determinations as to anticipated rates of prepayment under a variety of scenarios.

For additional considerations relating to the yield on the Offered Certificates, see “Yield Considerations” in the prospectus.

S-284

The Pooling and Servicing Agreement

General

The Certificates will be issued pursuant to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement, to be dated as of September 1, 2015 (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), by and among the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator and the Trustee.

The servicing of the Serviced Mortgage Loans, the Serviced Companion Loans and any related REO Properties will be governed by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The following summaries describe the material provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement relating to the servicing and administration of the Serviced Mortgage Loans, the Serviced Companion Loans and any related REO Properties. The summaries do not purport to be complete and are subject to the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. Reference is made to the prospectus for additional information regarding the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement relating to the servicing and administration of the Serviced Mortgage Loans, the Serviced Companion Loan and any related REO Properties. The information in this prospectus supplement supplements any information set forth in the prospectus.

Certain Considerations Regarding the Outside Serviced Loan Combinations

Each Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan and Outside Serviced Companion Loan is being serviced and administered in accordance with the related Outside Servicing Agreement and the related Co-Lender Agreement (and all decisions, consents, waivers, approvals and other actions on the part of the holders of such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan and Outside Serviced Companion Loan(s) will be effected in accordance with the related Outside Servicing Agreement and the related Co-Lender Agreement). Consequently, the servicing provisions set forth in this prospectus supplement and the administration of certain accounts related to the servicing of the Mortgage Loans will generally not be applicable to the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans, but instead such servicing and administration of each Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan will be governed by the related Outside Servicing Agreement.

The Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator and the Trustee have no obligation or authority to supervise any Outside Servicer, any Outside Special Servicer and/or any Outside Trustee under any Outside Servicing Agreement or to make property protection advances with respect to any Outside Serviced Loan Combination or P&I advances with respect to any Outside Serviced Companion Loans or any Serviced Companion Loan. Any obligations of the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer to provide information or remit collections on an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan are dependent on their receipt of the same from the applicable party under the related Outside Servicing Agreement. Each Outside Servicing Agreement provides for servicing in a manner acceptable for rated transactions similar in nature to this securitization transaction. For more detailed information, see “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.

As used in this prospectus supplement, references to the Mortgage Loans, when discussing servicing activities with respect to the Mortgage Loans, do not include, unless otherwise specifically indicated, the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans. In certain instances references are made that specifically exclude the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans from the servicing provisions in this prospectus supplement by indicating actions are taken with respect to the “Serviced Mortgage Loans” or the “Mortgage Loans other than the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” or are taken “except with respect to the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” or words of similar import. These references and carveouts are intended to highlight particular provisions to draw prospective investors’ attention to the fact that the Master Servicer, Special Servicer, Certificate Administrator or Trustee are not responsible for the particular servicing or administrative activity with respect to the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans and are not intended to imply that when other servicing actions are described in this prospectus supplement without such specific reference or carveouts, that the Master Servicer, Special Servicer, Certificate Administrator or Trustee are responsible for those duties with respect to the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan. Servicing of any Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan is handled under the Outside Servicing Agreement. Prospective investors are encouraged to review “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” and “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement for a discussion of certain important servicing terms related to the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans.

S-285

Assignment of the Mortgage Loans

On the Closing Date, the Depositor will sell, transfer or otherwise convey, assign or cause the assignment of the Mortgage Loans, together with all payments due on or with respect to the Mortgage Loans, other than principal and interest due on or before the Cut-off Date and principal prepayments received on or before the Cut-off Date, without recourse, to the Trustee for the benefit of the holders of Certificates.

The Certificate Administrator, concurrently with the assignment, will execute and deliver Certificates evidencing the beneficial ownership interests in the related Issuing Entity to or at the direction of the Depositor in exchange for the Mortgage Loans. Each Mortgage Loan will be identified in a schedule appearing as an exhibit to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Mortgage Loan Schedule”). The Mortgage Loan Schedule will include, among other things, as to each Mortgage Loan, information as to its outstanding principal balance as of the close of business on the Cut-off Date, as well as information respecting the interest rate and the maturity date of each Mortgage Loan.

In addition, the Depositor will require each Sponsor to deliver to the Trustee, in its capacity as custodian, the Mortgage File for each of the Mortgage Loans. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Sale of Mortgage Loans; Mortgage File Delivery” in this prospectus supplement.

The Trustee (in its capacity as custodian), or any other custodian appointed under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, will hold the Mortgage File for each Mortgage Loan in trust for the benefit of all Certificateholders and the holders of any related Serviced Companion Loans. Pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Trustee, in its capacity as custodian, is obligated to review the Mortgage File for each Mortgage Loan within a specified number of days after the execution and delivery of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. If the Special Servicer determines that a Material Document Defect exists, the Special Servicer will promptly notify, among others, the Depositor, the applicable Sponsor, the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee and the Master Servicer. If the applicable Sponsor cannot cure the Material Document Defect within the time period specified in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the applicable Sponsor will be obligated either to replace the affected Mortgage Loan with a substitute Mortgage Loan or Mortgage Loans, or to repurchase the related Mortgage Loan from the Trustee within the time period specified in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement at the Repurchase Price or at its election, subject to specified conditions, make a Loss of Value Payment with respect to the related Mortgage Loan. In the case of KGS, the parent of KGS, KGS Holdings, is guaranteeing the repurchase and substitution obligations of KGS under the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement in the event that KGS fails to perform its obligations to cure, effect a repurchase or substitute a Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan and pay any substitution shortfall amount in response to a Material Document Defect or Material Breach. In the case of RAIT, the parent of RAIT, RFT, is guaranteeing the repurchase and substitution obligations of RAIT under the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement in the event that RAIT fails to perform its obligations to cure, effect a repurchase or substitute a Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan and pay any substitution shortfall amount in response to a Material Document Defect or Material Breach. This substitution or purchase obligation (and such guaranty obligations) or the making of a Loss of Value Payment will constitute the sole remedy available to the Certificateholders or the Trustee for a Material Document Defect. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Cures, Repurchases and Substitutions” in this prospectus supplement.

Servicing of the Mortgage Loans

Each of the Master Servicer (directly or through one or more sub-servicers) and the Special Servicer will be required to service and administer the Serviced Loans (as described below). The Master Servicer may delegate and/or assign some or all of its servicing obligations and duties with respect to some or all of the Serviced Loans to one or more third-party sub-servicers, with the consent of the Depositor. The Master Servicer will be responsible for paying the servicing fees of any such sub-servicer. Notwithstanding any sub-servicing agreement, the Master Servicer will remain primarily liable to the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator and the Certificateholders and any Serviced Companion Loan Holder for the servicing and administering of the Serviced Loans in accordance with the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement without diminution of such obligation or liability by virtue of such sub-servicing agreement. The Special Servicer will not be permitted to appoint sub-servicers with respect to any of its servicing obligations and duties.

The Master Servicer and the Special Servicer, as the case may be, will each be required to service and administer the Serviced Loans and each related REO Property for which it is responsible in accordance with applicable law, the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the terms of the respective Serviced Loans

S-286

and, if applicable, the related Co-Lender Agreement and, to the extent consistent with the foregoing, in accordance with the following (the “Servicing Standard”):

· the higher of the following standards of care:

1. with the same care, skill, prudence and diligence with which the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, services and administers comparable mortgage loans with similar borrowers and comparable REO properties for other third-party portfolios, giving due consideration to the customary and usual standards of practice of prudent institutional commercial mortgage lenders servicing their own mortgage loans and REO properties; and

2. with the same care, skill, prudence and diligence with which the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, services and administers comparable mortgage loans and REO properties owned by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be; and

in either case, exercising reasonable business judgment and acting in accordance with applicable law, the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the terms of the respective subject Serviced Loans;

· with a view to—

1. the timely recovery of all payments of principal and interest, including balloon payments, under those Serviced Loans; or

2. in the case of (a) a Specially Serviced Loan or (b) a Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination) as to which the related Mortgaged Property is an REO Property, the maximization of recovery on that Mortgage Loan (or Serviced Loan Combination) to the Certificateholders (as if they were one lender) (or, if a Serviced Loan Combination is involved, with a view to the maximization of recovery on such Serviced Loan Combination to the Certificateholders and the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder(s) as if they were one lender (and, with respect to any Serviced AB Loan Combination, taking into account the subordinate nature of the related Subordinate Companion Loan)) of principal and interest, including balloon payments, on a present value basis; and

· without regard to—

1. any relationship, including as lender on any other debt, that the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, or any of its affiliates may have with any of the underlying borrowers, or any affiliate of the underlying borrowers, or any other party to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement;

2. the ownership of any Certificate (or any Companion Loan or other indebtedness secured by the related Mortgaged Property or any security backed by a Companion Loan) by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer or any affiliate of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be;

3. the obligation, if any, of the Master Servicer to make Advances;

4. the right of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, or any of its affiliates to receive compensation or reimbursement of costs under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement generally or with respect to any particular transaction; and

5. the ownership, servicing or management for others of any mortgage loan or real property not covered by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, or any of its affiliates.

The Servicing Standard will apply with respect to the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans or related REO Property only to the extent that the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer has any express duties or rights to grant consent with respect thereto pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

S-287

The Pooling and Servicing Agreement provides, however, that none of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, or any of their respective directors, officers, employees or agents will have any liability to the Issuing Entity or the Certificateholders for taking any action or refraining from taking any action in good faith or for errors in judgment. The foregoing provision would not protect the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer for the breach of its representations or warranties in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or any liability by reason of willful misconduct, bad faith, fraud or negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of its negligent disregard of its obligations or duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Trustee or any other successor Master Servicer assuming the obligations of the Master Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will be entitled to the compensation to which the Master Servicer would have been entitled after the date of the assumption of the Master Servicer’s obligations. If no successor Master Servicer can be obtained to perform such obligations for such compensation, additional amounts payable to such successor Master Servicer will be treated as Realized Losses.

In general, the Master Servicer will be responsible for the servicing and administration of each Serviced Mortgage Loan (and Serviced Companion Loan)—

· which is not a Specially Serviced Loan; or

· that is a Corrected Loan.

A “Specially Serviced Loan” means any Serviced Loan (including a related REO Mortgage Loan or REO Companion Loan) being serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for which any of the following events (each, a “Servicing Transfer Event”) has occurred as follows:

(a) the related borrower has failed to make when due any scheduled monthly debt service payment or a balloon payment, which failure continues unremedied (without regard to any grace period):

· except in the case of a Serviced Loan delinquent in respect of its balloon payment, for 60 days beyond the date that payment was due; or

· solely in the case of a delinquent balloon payment, (A) 60 days beyond the date on which that balloon payment was due (except as described in clause B below) or (B) in the case of a Serviced Loan delinquent with respect to the balloon payment as to which the related borrower delivered to the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer (and in either such case the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, must promptly deliver a copy thereof to the other such servicer), a written and fully executed or otherwise binding commitment (subject only to customary closing conditions) for refinancing from an acceptable lender reasonably satisfactory in form and substance to the Special Servicer prior to the date 60 days after maturity, 120 days beyond the date on which that balloon payment was due (or for such shorter period beyond the date on which that balloon payment was due during which the refinancing is scheduled to occur); or

(b) there has occurred a default (other than as set forth in clause (a) and other than an Acceptable Insurance Default) that the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer (and, in the case of the Special Servicer, with the consent of the related Directing Holder, unless (if the Controlling Class Representative is the related Directing Holder) a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing) determines materially impairs the value of the related Mortgaged Property as security for the Serviced Loan or otherwise materially adversely affects the interests of Certificateholders in the Serviced Mortgage Loan (or, in the case of a Serviced Loan Combination, the interests of the Certificateholders and the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder(s) in such Serviced Loan Combination), and continues unremedied for the applicable grace period under the terms of the Serviced Loan (or, if no grace period is specified and the default is capable of being cured, for 30 days); provided that such 30-day grace period does not apply to a default that gives rise to immediate acceleration of the related Serviced Loan without the application of a grace period under the terms of the Serviced Loan documents; and provided, further, that any default requiring a Property Advance will be deemed to materially and adversely affect the interests of the Certificateholders in the subject Serviced Mortgage Loan (or, in the case of a Serviced Loan Combination, the interests of the Certificateholders and the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder(s) in such Serviced Loan Combination); or

S-288

(c) a decree or order of a court or agency or supervisory authority having jurisdiction in the premises in an involuntary case under any present or future federal or state bankruptcy, insolvency or similar law or the appointment of a conservator or receiver or liquidator in any insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshaling of assets and liabilities or similar proceedings, or for the winding up or liquidation of its affairs, has been entered against the related borrower and such decree or order has remained in force and not dismissed for a period of 60 days (or a shorter period if the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer (and, in the case of the Special Servicer, with the consent of the related Directing Holder, unless a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing) determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that the circumstances warrant that the related Serviced Loan (or REO Mortgage Loan or REO Serviced Companion Loan) be transferred to special servicing); or

(d) the related borrower consents to the appointment of a conservator or receiver or liquidator in any insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshaling of assets and liabilities or similar proceedings of or relating to such borrower or of or relating to all or substantially all of its property; or

(e) the related borrower admits in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due, files a petition to take advantage of any applicable insolvency or reorganization statute, makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or voluntarily suspends payment of its obligations; or

(f) the Master Servicer has received notice of the commencement of foreclosure or similar proceedings with respect to the related Mortgaged Property; or

(g) the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer (and, in the case of the Special Servicer, with the consent of the related Directing Holder, unless (if the Controlling Class Representative is the related Directing Holder) a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing) determines that (i) a default (other than an Acceptable Insurance Default) under the Serviced Loan is reasonably foreseeable, (ii) such default would materially impair the value of the corresponding Mortgaged Property as security for the Serviced Loan or otherwise materially adversely affect the interests of Certificateholders in the Serviced Mortgage Loan (or, in the case of a Serviced Loan Combination, the interests of the Certificateholders or the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder(s) in the Serviced Loan Combination), and (iii) the default is likely to continue unremedied for the applicable cure period under the terms of the Serviced Loan or, if no cure period is specified and the default is capable of being cured, for 30 days (provided that such 30-day grace period does not apply to a default that gives rise to immediate acceleration without application of a grace period under the terms of the Serviced Loan).

It will be considered an “Acceptable Insurance Default” (and neither the Master Servicer nor the Special Servicer will be required to obtain the below described insurance) if the related Mortgage Loan documents specify that the related borrower must maintain all-risk casualty insurance or other insurance that covers damages or losses arising from acts of terrorism and the Special Servicer has determined, in its reasonable judgment in accordance with the Servicing Standard (and, with the consent of the related Directing Holder, unless (if the Controlling Class Representative is the related Directing Holder) a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing), that (i) this insurance is not available at commercially reasonable rates and the subject hazards are not commonly insured against by prudent owners of similar real properties located in or near the geographic region in which the Mortgaged Property is located (but only by reference to such insurance that has been obtained by such owners at current market rates), or (ii) this insurance is not available at any rate; provided, however, that the related Directing Holder will not have more than 30 days to respond to the Special Servicer’s request for such consent; provided, further, that upon the Special Servicer’s determination, consistent with the Servicing Standard, that exigent circumstances do not allow the Special Servicer to consult with the related Directing Holder, the Special Servicer will not be required to do so. In making this determination, the Special Servicer, to the extent consistent with the Servicing Standard, is entitled to rely on the opinion of an insurance consultant.

A Serviced Loan will cease to be a Specially Serviced Loan and will become a “Corrected Loan” when:

· with respect to the circumstances described in clause (a) of the definition of Specially Serviced Loan, the related borrower has made three consecutive full and timely scheduled monthly debt service payments under the terms of the Serviced Loan (as such terms may be changed or modified in connection with a bankruptcy or similar proceeding involving the related borrower or by

S-289

reason of a modification, extension, waiver or amendment granted or agreed to by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement);

· with respect to the circumstances described in clauses (c), (d), (e) and (g) of the definition of Specially Serviced Loan, the circumstances cease to exist in the good faith, reasonable judgment of the Special Servicer, but, with respect to any bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings described in clauses (c), (d) and (e), no later than the entry of an order or decree dismissing such proceeding;

· with respect to the circumstances described in clause (b) of the definition of Specially Serviced Loan, the default is cured as determined by the Special Servicer in its reasonable, good faith judgment; and

· with respect to the circumstances described in clause (f) of the definition of Specially Serviced Loan, the proceedings are terminated;

provided that at such time no other circumstance described in clauses (a) through (g) of the definition of “Specially Serviced Loan” exists that would cause the Mortgage Loan to be characterized as a “Specially Serviced Loan.”

If a Servicing Transfer Event exists with respect to the Mortgage Loan or any Companion Loan in a Serviced Loan Combination, it will be considered to exist for the entire Serviced Loan Combination.

The Special Servicer, on the other hand, will be responsible for the servicing and administration of each Serviced Loan as to which a Servicing Transfer Event has occurred and which has not yet become a Corrected Loan, and for the processing of certain matters related to non-Specially Serviced Loans. The Special Servicer may be responsible for conducting or managing certain Mortgage Loan related litigation (including with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans) as and to the extent set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Special Servicer will also be responsible for the administration of each REO Property acquired by the Issuing Entity.

Despite the foregoing, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will require the Master Servicer to continue to collect information and prepare all reports to the Certificate Administrator required to be collected or prepared with respect to any Specially Serviced Loans (based on, among other things, certain information provided by the Special Servicer), receive payments on Specially Serviced Loans, maintain escrows and all reserve accounts on Specially Serviced Loans, maintain insurance with respect to the Mortgaged Properties securing the Specially Serviced Loans and, otherwise, to render other incidental services with respect to any such specially serviced assets. In addition, the Special Servicer will perform limited duties and have certain approval rights regarding servicing actions with respect to Serviced Loans that are not Specially Serviced Loans.

Neither the Master Servicer nor the Special Servicer will have responsibility for the performance by the other of its respective obligations and duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

The Master Servicer will transfer servicing of a Serviced Loan to the Special Servicer when that Serviced Loan becomes a Specially Serviced Loan. The Special Servicer will return the servicing of that Serviced Loan to the Master Servicer when it becomes a Corrected Loan.

The Special Servicer will be obligated to, among other things, oversee the resolution of Serviced Loans that are Specially Serviced Loans and act as disposition manager of REO Properties (other than any interest in a Mortgaged Property acquired through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure with respect to an Outside Serviced Loan Combination). Each Outside Servicing Agreement provides or is expected to provide, as applicable, for certain servicing transfer events. Upon the occurrence of a servicing transfer event with respect to an Outside Serviced Loan Combination under the Outside Servicing Agreement, servicing of both the affected Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan and the related Outside Serviced Companion Loan(s) will be transferred to the Outside Special Servicer.

All net present value calculations and determinations made under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement with respect to any Serviced Mortgage Loan or related Mortgaged Property or REO Property (including for purposes of the definition of “Servicing Standard” set forth above) will be made by using a discount rate appropriate for the type of cash flows being discounted; namely (i) for principal and interest payments on the Mortgage Loan or proceeds from the sale of a defaulted Mortgage Loan, the highest of (1) the rate determined by the Master

S-290

Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, that approximates the market rate that would be obtainable by the borrowers on similar debt of the borrowers as of such date of determination, (2) the Mortgage Loan Rate and (3) the yield on 10-year U.S. treasuries and (ii) for all other cash flows, including property cash flow, the “discount rate” set forth in the most recent appraisal (or updated appraisal).

Advances

The Master Servicer will be obligated (subject to the limitations described below) to advance, on the business day immediately preceding a Distribution Date (the “Master Servicer Remittance Date”), an amount (each such amount, a “P&I Advance”) equal to the total or any portion of the Monthly Payment (exclusive of the related Servicing Fee) due or deemed due on a Mortgage Loan (including the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans, but not including any Companion Loan) for the Due Date in the related Collection Period, to the extent not received as of the close of business on the related Determination Date (without regard to any grace period). In the event the Monthly Payment has been reduced pursuant to any modification, waiver or amendment of the terms of the Mortgage Loan, whether agreed to by the Special Servicer or resulting from bankruptcy, insolvency or any similar proceeding involving the related borrower, the amount required to be advanced will be so reduced. The Master Servicer will not be required or permitted to make an advance for balloon payments, default interest, Excess Interest, prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges or delinquent monthly debt service payments on the Companion Loans. The amount required to be advanced by the Master Servicer with respect to any Distribution Date in respect of delinquent payments of interest on any Mortgage Loan as to which an Appraisal Reduction Amount exists will equal the product of (i) the amount otherwise required to be advanced by the Master Servicer with respect to delinquent payments of interest without giving effect to such Appraisal Reduction Amount, and (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which is the Stated Principal Balance of such Mortgage Loan as of the last day of the related Collection Period, reduced by such Appraisal Reduction Amount, and the denominator of which is the Stated Principal Balance of such Mortgage Loan as of the last day of the related Collection Period. Appraisal Reduction Amounts will not affect advances in respect of delinquent payments of principal.

The Master Servicer will also be obligated (subject to the limitations described below) with respect to each Serviced Loan serviced, and each REO Property administered, under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, to make cash advances (“Property Advances” and, together with P&I Advances, “Advances”) to pay all customary, reasonable and necessary “out of pocket” costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees and fees and expenses of real estate brokers) incurred in connection with the servicing and administration of such Serviced Loan if a default is imminent thereunder or a default, delinquency or other unanticipated event has occurred, or in connection with the administration of any such REO Property, including, but not limited to, the cost of the preservation, insurance, restoration, protection and management of a related Mortgaged Property, the cost of delinquent real estate taxes and assessments, ground lease rent payments, condominium assessments, hazard insurance premiums and to cover other similar costs and expenses necessary to preserve the priority of or enforce the related Mortgage or to maintain a related Mortgaged Property, subject to a non-recoverability determination. The Master Servicer has no obligation to make any Property Advances with regard to any Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan.

The Master Servicer will advance the cost of preparation of any environmental assessments required to be obtained in connection with taking title to any REO Property unless the Master Servicer determines, in its good faith judgment, that such Advance would be a Non-Recoverable Advance but the cost of any compliance, containment, clean-up or remediation of an REO Property will be an expense of the Issuing Entity and paid from the Collection Account.

The Pooling and Servicing Agreement will obligate the Trustee to make any P&I Advance that the Master Servicer was obligated, but failed, to make unless the Trustee or the Special Servicer determines such P&I Advance would be a Non-Recoverable Advance.

The Special Servicer is required to request the Master Servicer to make Property Advances with respect to a Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Special Servicer must make the request a specified number of days in advance of when the Property Advance is required to be made under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Master Servicer, in turn, must make the requested Property Advance within a specified number of days following the Master Servicer’s receipt of the request unless the Master Servicer determines such Advance would be a Non-Recoverable Advance. The Special Servicer will have no obligation to make any Property Advance, provided that, in an urgent or emergency situation requiring the making of a Property Advance, a Special Servicer may make such Property Advance, and the Master Servicer

S-291

will be required to reimburse the Special Servicer for such Advance (with interest on that Advance) within a specified number of days as set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, provided such Advance is not determined by the Master Servicer, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, to be a Non-Recoverable Advance. Once reimbursed, the Master Servicer will be deemed to have made such Property Advance as of the date made by the Special Servicer, and will be entitled to reimbursement with interest on that Advance in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. Any Property Advance made by the Special Servicer, but not reimbursed by the Master Servicer, will be reimbursable out of the Collection Account in the same manner as would be Property Advances made by the Master Servicer.

If the Master Servicer is required under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to make a Property Advance, but does not do so within 15 days after the Property Advance is required to be made by it, then the Trustee will be required:

· if a responsible officer of the Trustee has actual knowledge of the failure, to give the Master Servicer notice of its failure; and

· if the failure continues for three more business days, to make the Property Advance, unless the Trustee determines such Property Advance would be a Non-Recoverable Advance.

The Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Trustee, as applicable, will each be entitled to receive interest on Advances at the Prime Rate, compounded annually (the “Advance Rate”), as of each Master Servicer Remittance Date; provided, however, that with respect to any P&I Advance made prior to the expiration of the related grace period, interest on such P&I Advance will accrue only from and after the expiration of such grace period. If the interest on such Advance is not recovered from Modification Fees on the related Mortgage Loan or Penalty Charges on any Mortgage Loan, a shortfall will result which will have the same effect as a liquidation loss on a defaulted Mortgage Loan. The “Prime Rate” is the rate on any day set forth as such in The Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition.

The obligation of the Master Servicer or the Trustee, as applicable, to make Advances with respect to any Mortgage Loan pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement continues through the foreclosure of such Mortgage Loan and until the liquidation of such Mortgage Loan or the related Mortgaged Properties. Advances are intended to provide a limited amount of liquidity, not to guarantee or insure against losses.

Each Outside Servicer will (or is expected to) be obligated to make servicing advances with respect to the related Outside Serviced Loan Combination and will (or is expected to) be entitled to reimbursement for such servicing advances with interest at a prime lending rate. In addition, if any such servicing advance is determined to be a nonrecoverable advance under an Outside Servicing Agreement, then the Outside Servicer or the Outside Trustee, as applicable, will (or is expected to) be entitled to reimbursement from general collections on the Mortgage Loans in this securitization transaction for the pro rata portion of such nonrecoverable advances allocable to the related Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan (with interest at a prime lending rate) pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement.

If the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, or the Trustee in its good faith business judgment, as applicable, determines that any Advance (together with accrued interest on the Advance) previously made by it (or, in the case of a determination by the Special Servicer, by the Master Servicer or the Trustee) will not be ultimately recoverable out of related late payments, net insurance proceeds, Net Condemnation Proceeds, net liquidation proceeds or other collections with respect to the Mortgage Loan or REO Property, as the case may be, as to which such Advance was made (any such Advance, a “Non-Recoverable Advance”), then the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Trustee, as applicable, will be entitled to be reimbursed for such Advance, plus interest on the Advance at the Advance Rate, out of amounts payable on or in respect of all of the Mortgage Loans and REO Properties prior to distributions on the Certificates, which will be deemed to have been reimbursed first out of amounts collected or advanced in respect of principal and then out of all other amounts collected on the Mortgage Loans and REO Properties.

S-292

In connection with a determination by the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Trustee as to whether an Advance previously made or to be made constitutes or would constitute a Non-Recoverable Advance:

· neither the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer nor the Trustee will be required to make any Advance that the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, or the Trustee in its good faith business judgment, determines will not be ultimately recoverable (including interest accrued on the Advance) by the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Trustee, as applicable, out of related late payments, net insurance proceeds, Net Condemnation Proceeds, net liquidation proceeds or other collections with respect to the Mortgage Loan or REO Property, as the case may be, as to which such Advance was made;

· the Special Servicer may, at its option, make a determination in accordance with the Servicing Standard that any proposed Advance, if made, would be a Non-Recoverable Advance or that any outstanding Advance is a Non-Recoverable Advance and may deliver to the Master Servicer, the Trustee, the Controlling Class Representative (prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event) and, in the case of a Property Advance with respect to a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination, the related Outside Controlling Note Holder notice of such determination, which determination will be conclusive and binding on the Master Servicer and the Trustee;

· although the Special Servicer may determine whether an outstanding Advance is a Non-Recoverable Advance, the Special Servicer will have no right to (i) make an affirmative determination that any Property Advance previously made, to be made (or contemplated to be made) by the Master Servicer or the Trustee is, or would be, recoverable or (ii) reverse any other authorized person’s determination or to prohibit any such other authorized person from making a determination, that an Advance constitutes or would constitute a Non-Recoverable Advance; provided that this sentence will not be construed to limit the Special Servicer’s right to make a determination that an Advance to be made (or contemplated to be made) would be or a previously made Advance is a Non-Recoverable Advance, as described in the preceding bullet;

· any non-recoverability determination by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer described in this paragraph with respect to the non-recoverability of Advances will be conclusive and binding on the Master Servicer (in the case of such a determination by the Special Servicer) and the Trustee; and

· notwithstanding the foregoing, the Trustee may conclusively rely upon any determination by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer that any Advance would be recoverable (unless a non-recoverability determination has been made by the other servicer in accordance with the preceding bullet which is binding on the Trustee), and the Master Servicer may conclusively rely upon any determination by the Special Servicer that any Advance would be recoverable.

Any such judgment or determination with respect to the recoverability of Advances by any of the Trustee, the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer must be made (i) in the case of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, or (ii) in the case of the Trustee, in accordance with its good faith business judgment, and in any event will be required to be evidenced by an officer’s certificate delivered to, among others, the other such parties, the Controlling Class Representative (prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event) and, in the case of a Property Advance with respect to any Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination, the related Outside Controlling Note Holder, setting forth such judgment or determination of nonrecoverability and the procedures and considerations of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Trustee, as applicable, forming the basis of such determination.

With respect to an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan and the Master Servicer’s and Trustee’s obligation to make P&I Advances, the Master Servicer and the Trustee may make their own independent determination as to the recoverability or the nonrecoverability notwithstanding any determination of the recoverability or the nonrecoverability, as the case may be, by the Outside Servicer or Outside Trustee. In addition, an Outside Servicer under an Outside Servicing Agreement will be entitled to seek recovery from the Issuing Entity of the pro rata share of any non-recoverable servicing advance made with respect to such Outside Serviced Loan Combination, with interest at a prime lending rate.

S-293

The Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Trustee, as applicable, will be entitled to reimbursement for any Advance made by it, including (solely in the case of the Master Servicer or the Trustee) all P&I Advances made with respect to the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans, equal to the amount of such Advance and interest accrued on the Advance at the Advance Rate (i) from Penalty Charges and Modification Fees on the related Mortgage Loan by the borrower and any other collections on the Mortgage Loan, (ii) from insurance proceeds, condemnation proceeds or Liquidation Proceeds collected on the defaulted Mortgage Loan or the related Mortgaged Property or (iii) upon determining in good faith that such Advance with interest is not recoverable from amounts described in clauses (i) and (ii), from any other amounts from time to time on deposit in the Collection Account.

Notwithstanding anything in this prospectus supplement to the contrary, the Master Servicer may in accordance with the Servicing Standard elect (but is not required) to make a payment (and in the case of a Specially Serviced Loan, at the direction of the Special Servicer will be required to make a payment) from amounts on deposit in the Collection Account that would otherwise be a Property Advance with respect to a Mortgage Loan notwithstanding that the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer has determined that such a Property Advance would, if made, be a Non-Recoverable Advance, if making the payment would (x) prevent (i) the related Mortgaged Property from being uninsured or being sold at a tax sale or (ii) any event that would cause a loss of the priority of the lien of the related Mortgage, or the loss of any security for the related Mortgage Loan, or (y) would remediate any adverse environmental condition or circumstance at any of the Mortgaged Properties, if, in each instance, the Special Servicer or the Master Servicer, as applicable, determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that making the payment is in the best interest of the Certificateholders (and, with respect to any Serviced Loan Combination, the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder) (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and/or the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder constituted a single lender) (and, with respect to a Serviced AB Loan Combination, taking into account the subordinate nature of the related Subordinate Companion Loan).

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the funds in the Collection Account allocable to principal and available for distribution on the next Distribution Date are insufficient to fully reimburse the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Trustee, as applicable, for a Non-Recoverable Advance, then such party may elect, on a monthly basis, in its sole discretion, to defer reimbursement of some or all of the portion that exceeds such amount allocable to principal (in which case interest will continue to accrue on the unreimbursed portion of the Advance) for a period not to exceed 12 months in any event; provided that any deferral in excess of six months will be subject to the consent of the Controlling Class Representative (or, in the case of a Property Advance with respect to a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination, the related Outside Controlling Note Holder) (unless, if the Controlling Class Representative is the consenting party, a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, in which case the Controlling Class Representative must be consulted with unless a Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing). In addition, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Trustee, as applicable, will be entitled to recover any Advance that is outstanding at the time that a Mortgage Loan is modified but is not repaid in full by the borrower in connection with such modification but becomes an obligation of the borrower to pay such amounts in the future (such Advance, a “Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount”) out of principal collections in the Collection Account (net of any amounts used to pay a Non-Recoverable Advance or interest on such Non-Recoverable Advance). The Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Trustee will be permitted to recover a Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount from general collections in the Collection Account if the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Trustee, as applicable, (a) has determined that such Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount would not be recoverable out of collections on the related Mortgage Loan or (b) has determined that such Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amount would not ultimately be recoverable, along with any other Workout-Delayed Reimbursement Amounts and Non-Recoverable Advances, out of the principal portion of future collections on the Mortgage Loans and the REO Properties.

Any requirement of the Master Servicer or the Trustee to make an Advance in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement is intended solely to provide liquidity for the benefit of the Certificateholders and not as credit support or otherwise to impose on any such person the risk of loss with respect to one or more Mortgage Loans.

Any election described above by any party to refrain from reimbursing itself for any Non-Recoverable Advance (together with interest for that Non-Recoverable Advance) or portion of any Non-Recoverable Advance with respect to any Distribution Date will not be construed to impose on any party any obligation to make the above described election (or any entitlement in favor of any Certificateholder or any other person to an election) with respect to any subsequent Collection Period or to constitute a waiver or limitation on the right of the person making the election to otherwise be reimbursed for a Non-Recoverable Advance immediately (together with

S-294

interest on that Non-Recoverable Advance). An election by the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Trustee will not be construed to impose any duty on either other party to make an election (or any entitlement in favor of any Certificateholder or any other person to such an election). The fact that a decision to recover a Non-Recoverable Advance over time, or not to do so, benefits some Classes of Certificateholders to the detriment of other Classes of Certificateholders will not constitute a violation of the Servicing Standard or a breach of the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement by any party, or a violation of any fiduciary duty owed by any party to the Certificateholders. The Master Servicer’s, the Special Servicer’s or the Trustee’s decision to defer reimbursement of such Non-Recoverable Advances as set forth above is an accommodation to the Certificateholders and is not to be construed as an obligation on the part of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Trustee or a right of the Certificateholders.

Accounts

The Master Servicer will be required to deposit amounts collected in respect of the Mortgage Loans into a segregated account (the “Collection Account”) established pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Master Servicer will also be required to establish and maintain a segregated custodial account (the “Loan Combination Custodial Account”) with respect to each Serviced Loan Combination (if any), which may be a sub-account of the Collection Account and deposit amounts collected in respect of such Serviced Loan Combination in the related Loan Combination Custodial Account. The Issuing Entity will only be entitled to amounts on deposit in a Loan Combination Custodial Account to the extent these funds are not otherwise payable to a related Companion Loan Holder or payable or reimbursable to any party to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. Any amounts in a Loan Combination Custodial Account to which the Issuing Entity is entitled will be transferred on a monthly basis to the Collection Account.

The Certificate Administrator will be required to establish and maintain the following two accounts, which may be sub-accounts of a single account: (i) the “Lower-Tier Distribution Account” and (ii) the “Upper Tier Distribution Account” (collectively with the Lower-Tier Distribution Account, the “Distribution Account”). With respect to each Distribution Date, on the related Master Servicer Remittance Date, the Master Servicer will be required to disburse from the Collection Account and remit to the Certificate Administrator for deposit into the Lower-Tier Distribution Account in respect of the related Mortgage Loans, to the extent of funds on deposit in the Collection Account, the Available Funds for such Distribution Date and any prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges collected during the applicable one-month period ending on the related Determination Date (or, in the case of an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, received by the Master Servicer as of the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the applicable Master Servicer Remittance Date and not previously so remitted to the Certificate Administrator). In addition, the Master Servicer will be required to remit to the Certificate Administrator all P&I Advances for deposit into the Lower-Tier Distribution Account on the related Master Servicer Remittance Date. To the extent the Master Servicer fails to do so, the Trustee will deposit all P&I Advances into the Lower-Tier Distribution Account, as applicable, as described in this prospectus supplement. On each Distribution Date, the Certificate Administrator will be required to withdraw amounts distributable on such date on the Regular Certificates, the Class R Certificates (other than in respect of the residual interest in the Lower-Tier REMIC) and the Trust Components first, from the Lower-Tier Distribution Account, and deposit such amounts in the Upper Tier Distribution Account for distribution on the Certificates. See “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions” in this prospectus supplement.

The Certificate Administrator will also be required to establish and maintain an account (the “Interest Reserve Account”), which may be a sub-account of the Distribution Account. On each Master Servicer Remittance Date occurring in January (except during a leap year) or February (commencing in 2016) (unless, in either case, the related Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date), the Master Servicer will be required to remit to the Certificate Administrator for deposit, in respect of each Mortgage Loan that accrues interest on an Actual/360 basis, an amount equal to one day’s interest at the related Mortgage Loan Rate (net of the related Administrative Fee Rate) on the respective Stated Principal Balance, as of the close of business on the Distribution Date in the month preceding the month in which such Master Servicer Remittance Date occurs, to the extent the applicable Monthly Payment or a P&I Advance is made in respect of the Monthly Payment (all amounts so deposited in any consecutive January (if applicable) and February, “Withheld Amounts”). On each Master Servicer Remittance Date occurring in March (or February, if such Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date), the Certificate Administrator will be required to withdraw from the Interest Reserve Account an amount equal to the Withheld Amounts, if any, from the preceding January (if applicable) and February, and deposit such amount into the Lower-Tier Distribution Account.

S-295

If there are any ARD Loans included in the Issuing Entity, the Certificate Administrator will also be required to establish and maintain an account (the “Excess Interest Distribution Account”), which may be a sub-account of a Distribution Account. The Excess Interest Distribution Account will be an asset of the Grantor Trust. On the Master Servicer Remittance Date immediately preceding the applicable Distribution Date, the Master Servicer is required to remit to the Certificate Administrator for deposit into the Excess Interest Distribution Account an amount equal to the Excess Interest received by the Master Servicer during the applicable one-month period ending on the related Determination Date.

The Certificate Administrator will also be required to establish and maintain an account (the “Excess Liquidation Proceeds Reserve Account”), which may be a sub-account of a Distribution Account. To the extent that any gains are realized on sales of Mortgaged Properties, such gains will be deposited into the Excess Liquidation Proceeds Reserve Account and applied to all amounts due and payable on the Regular Certificates and the Trust Components and all Realized Losses allocable to such Certificates or Trust Components after application of the Available Funds for such Distribution Date. However, holders of the Class R Certificates will be entitled to distributions of amounts on deposit in the Excess Liquidation Proceeds Reserve Account that exceed amounts reasonably anticipated to be required to offset possible future Realized Losses, as determined by the Special Servicer from time to time, or that remain after all distributions with respect to the Regular Certificates on the final Distribution Date.

The Certificate Administrator will also be required to establish and maintain an account (the “Exchangeable Distribution Account”), for the benefit of holders of Exchangeable Certificates, which may be a sub-account of a Distribution Account. Amounts distributed with respect to a Trust Component are to be deposited in the Exchangeable Distribution Account and then withdrawn and distributed in the appropriate proportions to the holders of the applicable Classes of Exchangeable Certificates.

Other accounts to be established pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are one or more REO Accounts for collections from REO Properties.

The Collection Account, any Loan Combination Custodial Account, any REO Account, the Distribution Account, the Interest Reserve Account, the Exchangeable Distribution Account, the Excess Liquidation Proceeds Reserve Account and the Excess Interest Distribution Account will be held in the name of the Certificate Administrator (or the Master Servicer (in the case of the Collection Account and each Loan Combination Custodial Account) or the Special Servicer (in the case of any REO Account)) on behalf of the Trustee for the benefit of the holders of Certificates. Each of the Collection Account, any Loan Combination Custodial Account, any REO Account, the Distribution Account, the Interest Reserve Account, any escrow account, the Exchangeable Distribution Account, the Excess Liquidation Proceeds Reserve Account and the Excess Interest Distribution Account will be held at a depository institution or trust company meeting the requirements of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or satisfactory to the Rating Agencies.

Amounts on deposit in the Distribution Account, the Exchangeable Distribution Account, the Excess Liquidation Proceeds Reserve Account, the Excess Interest Distribution Account and the Interest Reserve Account will remain uninvested, and such accounts will be non-interest bearing.

Amounts on deposit in the Collection Account, any Loan Combination Custodial Account, the Excess Interest Distribution Account and any REO Account may be invested in certain United States government securities and other high-quality investments meeting the requirements of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or satisfactory to the Rating Agencies. Interest or other income earned on funds in the Collection Account and any Loan Combination Custodial Account will be paid to the Master Servicer as additional servicing compensation, and interest or other income earned on funds in any REO Account will be payable to the Special Servicer.

If with respect to any Serviced Loan the related Mortgage Loan documents permit the lender to, at its option prior to an event of default under the related Serviced Loan, apply amounts held in any reserve account as a prepayment or hold such amounts in a reserve account, neither the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, may apply such amounts as a prepayment, and will instead continue to hold such amounts in the applicable reserve account. Such amount may be used, if permitted under the Serviced Loan documents, to defease the loan, or may be used to prepay the Serviced Loan upon a subsequent default.

S-296

Application of Penalty Charges and Modification Fees

On or prior to the second business day before each Master Servicer Remittance Date, the Master Servicer is required to apply all Penalty Charges and Modification Fees received by it with respect to a Mortgage Loan (including each Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, to the extent allocable to such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement and remitted to the Master Servicer by the Outside Servicer) or Serviced Loan Combination (subject to the allocation of Penalty Charges under the related Co-Lender Agreement), during the related one-month period ending on the related Determination Date, as follows:

first, to the extent of all Penalty Charges and Modification Fees (in such order), to pay or reimburse the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and/or the Trustee, as applicable, for all outstanding Advances (including unreimbursed Advances that have been determined to be Non-Recoverable Advances), the related interest on Advances and other outstanding additional expenses of the Issuing Entity (exclusive of Special Servicing Fees, Workout Fees and Liquidation Fees) other than Borrower Delayed Reimbursements, in each case, with respect to such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Loan Combination;

second, to the extent of all remaining Penalty Charges and Modification Fees (in such order), as a reimbursement to the Issuing Entity of all Advances (and related interest on Advances) with respect to such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Loan Combination previously determined to be Non-Recoverable Advances and previously reimbursed to the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and/or the Trustee, as applicable, from amounts on deposit in the Collection Account (and such amounts will be retained or deposited in the Collection Account as recoveries of such Non-Recoverable Advances and related interest on Non-Recoverable Advances) other than Borrower Delayed Reimbursements;

third, to the extent of all remaining Penalty Charges and Modification Fees (in such order), as a reimbursement to the Issuing Entity of all other additional expenses of the Issuing Entity (exclusive of Special Servicing Fees, Workout Fees and Liquidation Fees) with respect to such Mortgage Loan or Serviced Loan Combination previously paid from the Collection Account or Loan Combination Custodial Account (and such amounts will be retained or deposited in the Collection Account or Loan Combination Custodial Account, as applicable, as recoveries of such additional expenses of the Issuing Entity) other than Borrower Delayed Reimbursements; and

fourth, to the extent of any remaining Penalty Charges and any remaining Modification Fees, to the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, as compensation.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Penalty Charges collected on any Loan Combination are allocable in accordance with the related Co-Lender Agreement as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” above.

Withdrawals from the Collection Account

The Master Servicer may make withdrawals from the Collection Account (exclusive of any Loan Combination Custodial Account that may be a subaccount thereof) for the following purposes, to the extent permitted, as well as any other purpose described in this prospectus supplement (the order set forth below not constituting an order of priority for such withdrawals): (i) to remit on or before each Master Servicer Remittance Date (A) to the Certificate Administrator for deposit into the Lower-Tier Distribution Account an amount equal to the sum of (I) the Available Funds for the related Distribution Date and any prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges collected during the applicable one-month period ending on the related Determination Date and (II) the Trustee/Certificate Administrator Fee for the related Distribution Date, (B) to the Certificate Administrator for deposit into the Excess Liquidation Proceeds Reserve Account an amount equal to the excess Liquidation Proceeds received in the applicable one-month period ending on the related Determination Date, if any,(C) to the Certificate Administrator for deposit into the Excess Interest Distribution Account an amount equal to the Excess Interest received in the applicable one-month period ending on the related Determination Date, if any, and (D) if such Master Servicer Remittance Date occurs in January (except during a leap year) or February (unless, in either case, the related Distribution Date is the final Distribution Date), to the Certificate Administrator for deposit into the Interest Reserve Account an amount required to be withheld as described above under “—Accounts,” (ii) to pay or reimburse the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Trustee, as applicable, pursuant to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Advances made by any of them and interest on Advances (the Master Servicer’s, the Special Servicer’s or the Trustee’s right, as applicable, to reimbursement for items

S-297

described in this clause (ii) being limited as described above under “—Advances”), (iii) to pay on or before each Master Servicer Remittance Date (x) to the Master Servicer as compensation, the aggregate unpaid Servicing Fee earned with respect to the Mortgage Loans through the end of the most recently ended Interest Accrual Period, and (y) to the Special Servicer as compensation, unpaid special servicing compensation earned with respect to the Mortgage Loans through the immediately preceding Determination Date (or, in the case of Special Servicing Fees, accrued with respect to the Mortgage Loans that are Specially Serviced Loans through the end of the most recently ended Interest Accrual Period), (iv) to pay to the Operating Advisor the Operating Advisor Fee, (v) to pay on or before each Distribution Date to any person with respect to each related Mortgage Loan or REO Property that has previously been purchased or repurchased by such person pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, a Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, a Co-Lender Agreement (if applicable) or a mezzanine intercreditor agreement, all amounts received on such Mortgage Loan or REO Property during the applicable one-month period ending on the related Determination Date and subsequent to the date as of which the amount required to effect such purchase or repurchase was determined, (vi) to the extent not reimbursed or paid pursuant to any of the above clauses, to reimburse or pay the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Operating Advisor and/or the Depositor for unpaid compensation (in the case of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator or the Operating Advisor), unpaid additional expenses of the Issuing Entity and certain other unreimbursed expenses incurred by such person pursuant to and to the extent reimbursable under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and to satisfy any indemnification obligations of the Issuing Entity under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (vii) to pay to the Certificate Administrator amounts reasonably determined by the Certificate Administrator to be necessary to pay any applicable federal, state or local taxes imposed on either Trust REMIC, (viii) to pay the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee, (ix) to withdraw any amount deposited into the Collection Account that was not required to be deposited in the Collection Account, and (x) to clear and terminate the Collection Account pursuant to a plan for termination and liquidation of the Issuing Entity. However, certain of the foregoing withdrawals of items specifically related to a Serviced Loan Combination or related REO Property will first be made out of the related Loan Combination Custodial Account and will be made out of the Collection Account only if and to the extent that amounts in the related Loan Combination Custodial Account are insufficient or, based on the related Co-Lender Agreement, unavailable to make the relevant payment or reimbursement. If the Master Servicer makes any reimbursement or payment out of the Collection Account to cover the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder’s share of any cost, expense, indemnity, Property Advance or interest on such Property Advance, or fee with respect to a Serviced Loan Combination (taking into account the subordinate nature of any related Subordinate Companion Loan), then the Master Servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans) and the Special Servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans) must use efforts consistent with the Servicing Standard to collect such amount out of collections on such Serviced Companion Loan or, if and to the extent permitted under the related Co-Lender Agreement, from such Serviced Companion Loan Holder. The Master Servicer will also be entitled to make withdrawals from the Collection Account of amounts necessary for the payments or reimbursements required to be paid to the parties to, and/or the securitization trust created under, any Outside Servicing Agreement pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement.

If a P&I Advance is made with respect to any Serviced Mortgage Loan that is part of a Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination, then that P&I Advance, together with interest on such P&I Advance, may only be reimbursed out of future payments and collections on that Serviced Mortgage Loan or, as and to the extent described under “—Advances” above, on other Mortgage Loans, but not out of payments or other collections on the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan. Likewise, the Trustee/Certificate Administrator Fee and the Operating Advisor Fee that accrue with respect to any Serviced Mortgage Loan that is part of a Serviced Loan Combination and any other amounts payable to the Operating Advisor may only be paid out of payments and other collections on such Serviced Mortgage Loan and/or the Mortgage Pool generally, but not out of payments or other collections on the related Serviced Companion Loan.

Enforcement of “Due-On-Sale” and “Due-On-Encumbrance” Clauses

Due-On-Sale

Subject to the discussion under “—Directing Holder” and “—Operating Advisor” below and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” in this prospectus supplement, the Special Servicer will be required (a) with respect to Specially Serviced Loans, to determine in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard and (b) with respect to Serviced Mortgage Loans and Serviced Loan Combinations that are non-Specially Serviced Loans, to determine, in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard (or if mutually agreed to by the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer, the Master Servicer will process and provide its recommendation (with any

S-298

action to be subject to the Special Servicer’s determination and consent), whether to waive any right the lender under any Serviced Mortgage Loan or Serviced Loan Combination may have under a due-on-sale clause (which will include, without limitation, sale or transfers of Mortgaged Properties, in full or in part, or the sale, transfer, pledge or hypothecation of direct or indirect interests in the borrower or its owner, to the extent prohibited under the related Mortgage Loan documents) to accelerate payment of that Serviced Mortgage Loan or Serviced Loan Combination. However, neither the Master Servicer nor the Special Servicer may waive the rights of the lender or grant its consent under any due-on-sale clause, unless—

· the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, has received a Rating Agency Confirmation, or

· such Serviced Mortgage Loan (or the Serviced Mortgage Loan related to the Serviced Loan Combination) (A) represents less than 5% of the principal balance of all of the Mortgage Loans in the Issuing Entity, (B) has a principal balance that is $35 million or less, and (C) is not one of the 10 largest Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan) in the pool based on principal balance (although no such Rating Agency Confirmation will be required if such Serviced Mortgage Loan has a principal balance less than $10,000,000).

Due-On-Encumbrance

Subject to the discussion under “—Directing Holder” and “—Operating Advisor” below and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” in this prospectus supplement, the Special Servicer will be required (a) with respect to Specially Serviced Loans, to determine, in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard and (b) with respect to Serviced Mortgage Loans and Serviced Loan Combinations that are non-Specially Serviced Loans, to determine (or, if mutually agreed to by the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer, the Master Servicer will process and provide its recommendation (with any action to be subject to the Special Servicer’s determination and consent), in a manner consistent with the Servicing Standard, whether to waive any right the lender under any such Serviced Mortgage Loan or Serviced Loan Combination may have under a due-on-encumbrance clause (which will include, without limitation, any mezzanine/subordinate financing of the borrower or the Mortgaged Property or any sale or transfer of preferred equity in the borrower or its owners, to the extent prohibited under the related Mortgage Loan documents) to accelerate payment of that Serviced Mortgage Loan or Serviced Loan Combination. However, neither the Master Servicer nor the Special Servicer, as applicable, may waive the rights of the lender or grant its consent under any due-on-encumbrance clause, unless—

· the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, has received a Rating Agency Confirmation, or

· such Serviced Mortgage Loan (or the Serviced Mortgage Loan related to the Serviced Loan Combination) (A) represents less than 2% of the aggregate principal balance of all of the Mortgage Loans in the Issuing Entity, (B) has a principal balance that is $20 million or less, (C) has a loan-to-value ratio equal to or less than 85% (including any existing and proposed debt), (D) has a debt service coverage ratio equal to or greater than 1.20x (in each case, determined based upon the aggregate of the principal balance of the Serviced Mortgage Loan, any related Serviced Companion Loan (if applicable) and the principal amount of the proposed additional lien) and (E) is not one of the 10 largest Mortgage Loans (considering any Crossed Group as a single Mortgage Loan) in the pool based on principal balance (although no such Rating Agency Confirmation will be required if such Mortgage Loan has a principal balance less than $10,000,000).

Notwithstanding the foregoing, without any other approval or consent, the Master Servicer (for non-Specially Serviced Loans) or the Special Servicer (for Specially Serviced Loans) may grant and process a borrower’s request for consent to subject the related Mortgaged Property to an immaterial easement, right of way or similar agreement for utilities, access, parking, public improvements or another purpose and may consent to subordination of the related Mortgage Loan to such easement, right of way or similar agreement.

See “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Due-on-Sale and Due-on-Encumbrance Provisions” in the prospectus.

S-299

Inspections

The Master Servicer (or with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan, the Special Servicer) is required to inspect or cause to be inspected each Mortgaged Property (other than a Mortgaged Property securing the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans) at such times and in such manner as are consistent with the Servicing Standard, but in any event at least once every calendar year with respect to Serviced Mortgage Loans with an outstanding principal balance of $2,000,000 or more and at least once every other calendar year with respect to Serviced Mortgage Loans with an outstanding principal balance of less than $2,000,000, in each case commencing in 2016; provided that the Master Servicer is not required to inspect any Mortgaged Property that has been inspected by the Special Servicer during the preceding 12 months. The Special Servicer is required to inspect the Mortgaged Property securing each Serviced Loan that becomes a Specially Serviced Loan as soon as practicable after it becomes a Specially Serviced Loan and thereafter at least once every calendar year until such condition ceases to exist. The cost of any such inspection is required to be borne by the Master Servicer unless the related Serviced Loan is a Specially Serviced Loan, in which case the Master Servicer will be required to reimburse the Special Servicer for such cost as a Property Advance (or as an expense of the Issuing Entity if the Property Advance would be a Non-Recoverable Advance) and any out-of-pocket costs will be borne by the Issuing Entity.

Evidence as to Compliance

Each of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer (regardless of whether it has commenced special servicing of any Mortgage Loan) and the Certificate Administrator are required under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to deliver (and each of the Master Servicer and the Certificate Administrator is required to cause (or, in the case of a sub-servicer retained at the request of a Sponsor, use commercially reasonable efforts to cause) any affiliated sub-servicer, or any of its other sub-servicers that is servicing at least 10% of the Mortgage Loans by balance, to deliver) annually to, among others, the Certificate Administrator and the Operating Advisor (only in the case of an officer’s certificate furnished by the Special Servicer and after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event) and the Depositor on or before the date specified in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, a certificate of an authorized officer of such party stating, among other things, that (i) a review of that party’s servicing activities during the preceding calendar year or portion of that year and of performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (or the related sub-servicing agreement in the case of a sub-servicer, as applicable) has been made under such officer’s supervision and (ii) to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on the review, such party has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (or the related sub-servicing agreement in the case of a sub-servicer, as applicable) in all material respects throughout the preceding calendar year or portion of the preceding year, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifying the failure known to such officer and the nature and status of the failure. In general, none of these parties will be responsible for the performance by any other such party of that other party’s duties described above.

In addition, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer (regardless of whether a special servicer has commenced special servicing of any Mortgage Loan), the Certificate Administrator and the Operating Advisor are each (at its own expense) required to furnish (and each of the preceding parties, as applicable, is required to cause (or, in the case of a Servicing Function Participant retained at the request of a Sponsor, to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause) each Servicing Function Participant retained by it to furnish), annually, to, among others, the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee, the Operating Advisor (in the case of the Special Servicer only and only after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event) and the Depositor, a report (an “Assessment of Compliance”) assessing compliance by that party with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB that contains the following:

· a statement of the party’s responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB applicable to it;

· a statement that the party used the criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria;

· the party’s assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria during and as of the end of the preceding calendar year, setting forth any material instance of noncompliance identified by the party, a discussion of each such failure and the nature and status of each such failure; and

S-300

· a statement that a registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report (an “Attestation Report”) on the party’s assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria during and as of the end of the preceding calendar year.

Each party that is required to deliver an Assessment of Compliance will also be required to simultaneously deliver an Attestation Report of a registered public accounting firm, prepared in accordance with the standards for attestation engagements issued or adopted by the public company accounting oversight board, that expresses an opinion, or states that an opinion cannot be expressed (and the reasons for this), concerning the party’s assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB.

For the avoidance of doubt, the Trustee shall have no obligation or duty to determine whether any Assessment of Compliance provided by the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or any other Servicing Function Participant is in form and substance in compliance with the requirements of Regulation AB.

A “Servicing Function Participant” is any person or entity, other than the Certificate Administrator, the Operating Advisor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Trustee, that is performing activities with respect to the Issuing Entity that address the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB, unless those activities relate to 5% or less of the Mortgage Loans by balance.

Certain Matters Regarding the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Operating Advisor

Each of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Operating Advisor may assign its rights and delegate its duties and obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; provided that certain conditions are satisfied including obtaining a Rating Agency Confirmation. The resigning Master Servicer, Special Servicer or Operating Advisor, as applicable, must pay all costs and expenses associated with the transfer of its duties after resignation. The Pooling and Servicing Agreement provides that the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Operating Advisor, as the case may be, may not otherwise resign from its obligations and duties as Master Servicer, Special Servicer or Operating Advisor, as the case may be, except upon the determination that performance of its duties is no longer permissible under applicable law and provided that such determination is evidenced by an opinion of counsel to that effect delivered to the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator. No such resignation may become effective until the Trustee (solely with respect to the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer) or a successor Master Servicer, Special Servicer or Operating Advisor has assumed the obligations of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Operating Advisor, as applicable, under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Trustee or any other successor Master Servicer, Special Servicer or Operating Advisor assuming the obligations of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Operating Advisor under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will be entitled to the compensation to which the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Operating Advisor would have been entitled after the date of assumption of such obligations (other than certain Workout Fees which the prior Special Servicer will be entitled to retain and other than the excess servicing portion of the Servicing Fee which, subject to reduction in order to retain a successor, may be retained or transferred by the initial Master Servicer). If no successor Master Servicer, Special Servicer or Operating Advisor can be obtained to perform such obligations for such compensation, additional amounts payable to such successor Master Servicer, Special Servicer or Operating Advisor will result in shortfalls in distributions on the Certificates. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Operating Advisor may resign, without payment of any penalty, at any time after the Certificate Principal Amounts of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB, Class A-S, Class B, Class PEZ, Class C and Class D Certificates have been reduced to zero. In such circumstance, no replacement Operating Advisor will be required to be appointed.

The Pooling and Servicing Agreement also provides that none of the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, or any director, member, manager, officer, employee or agent of the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Operating Advisor will be under any liability to the Issuing Entity, the holders of the Certificates, a Companion Loan Holder, or any other person for any action taken or for refraining from the taking of any action in good faith pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, or for errors in judgment. However, none of the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor or any such person will be protected against any liability which would otherwise be imposed by reason of (i) any breach of warranty or representation by such party in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, or (ii) any willful misconduct, bad faith, fraud or negligence by such party in the performance of its respective obligations and duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or by reason of negligent disregard by such party of its respective obligations or duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. In addition, each of the Master

S-301

Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Operating Advisor will indemnify the Issuing Entity against any and all loss, liability or reasonable expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses) incurred by the Issuing Entity as a result of any willful misconduct, bad faith, fraud or negligence in the performance of the respective duties of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Operating Advisor, as the case may be, or by reason of negligent disregard of the Master Servicer’s, the Special Servicer’s or the Operating Advisor’s, as the case may be, obligations or duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

The Pooling and Servicing Agreement further provides that the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor and any director, member, manager, officer, employee or agent of the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Operating Advisor will be entitled to indemnification by the Issuing Entity for any loss, liability, penalty, fine, forfeiture, claim, judgment or expense incurred in connection with, or relating to, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or the Certificates, other than any such loss, liability, penalty, fine, forfeiture, claim, judgment or expense: (i) specifically required to be borne by the party seeking indemnification, without right of reimbursement pursuant to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; (ii) which constitutes an Advance that is otherwise reimbursable under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; (iii) resulting from any breach on the part of that party of a representation or warranty made in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; or (iv) incurred by reason of any willful misconduct, bad faith, fraud or negligence on the part of that party in the performance of its obligations or duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or negligent disregard of such obligations or duties.

In addition, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement provides that none of the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee or the Operating Advisor will be under any obligation to appear in, prosecute or defend any legal action unless such action is related to its duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and which in its opinion does not expose it to any expense or liability for which reimbursement is not reasonably assured. The Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee or the Operating Advisor may, however, in its discretion undertake any such action which it may deem necessary or desirable with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the rights and duties of the parties to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the interests of the holders of Certificates under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. In such event, the reasonable legal expenses and costs of such action and any liability resulting from such action will be expenses, costs and liabilities of the Issuing Entity, and the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee and the Operating Advisor will be entitled to be reimbursed for those amounts from the Collection Account.

The Depositor is not obligated to monitor or supervise the performance of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator or the Trustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Depositor may, but is not obligated to, enforce the obligations of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and may, but is not obligated to, perform or cause a designee to perform any defaulted obligation of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer or exercise any right of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. In the event the Depositor undertakes any such action, it will be reimbursed and indemnified by the Issuing Entity to the extent not recoverable from the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable. Any such action by the Depositor will not relieve the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

The Pooling and Servicing Agreement provides that, with respect to each Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, each of (a) (as and to the same extent the Outside Securitization is required to indemnify each of the following parties in respect of other mortgage loans in such Outside Securitization pursuant to the terms of the Outside Servicing Agreement) the Outside Servicer, the Outside Special Servicer, the Outside Trustee and the certificate administrator, the operating advisor and the depositor under the Outside Servicing Agreement (and any director, officer, employee or agent of any of the foregoing, to the extent such parties are identified as indemnified parties in the Outside Servicing Agreement in respect of other mortgage loans included in such Outside Securitization) and (b) the Outside Securitization (such parties in clause (a) and the Outside Securitization collectively, the “Pari Passu Indemnified Parties”) shall be entitled to be indemnified against any claims, losses, penalties, fines, forfeitures, legal fees and related costs, judgments and any other costs, liabilities, fees and expenses incurred in connection with the servicing and administration of such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan and the related Mortgaged Property (or, with respect to the operating advisor under the Outside Servicing Agreement, incurred in connection with the provision of services for such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan) under the Outside Servicing Agreement (collectively, the “Pari Passu Indemnified Items”) to the extent of the Issuing Entity’s pro rata share of such Pari Passu Indemnified Items, and to the extent amounts on deposit in the related “whole loan custodial

S-302

account” maintained pursuant to the Outside Servicing Agreement that are allocated to such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan are insufficient for reimbursement of such amounts, such Indemnified Party shall be entitled to be reimbursed by the Issuing Entity (including out of general collections in the Collection Account) for the Issuing Entity’s pro rata share of the insufficiency.

In addition, the Co-Lender Agreement executed with respect to each Outside Serviced Loan Combination provides that this securitization transaction is obligated to promptly reimburse the Outside Servicer, the Outside Special Servicer, the Outside Trustee, the certificate administrator under the Outside Servicing Agreement or the Outside Securitization, as applicable, for the Issuing Entity’s pro rata share of any fees, costs or expenses incurred in connection with the servicing and administration such Outside Serviced Loan Combination as to which the Outside Securitization or any of the parties thereto are entitled to be reimbursed pursuant to the terms of the Outside Servicing Agreement. Reimbursement of such pro rata share will be made out of general collections in the Issuing Entity’s Collection Account, to the extent reimbursement out of collections on the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan are insufficient therefor.

Servicer Termination Events

“Servicer Termination Events” under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement with respect to the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, will include, without limitation:

(a)     (i) any failure by the Master Servicer to make a required deposit to the Collection Account or any Loan Combination Custodial Account or make a required remittance to any Serviced Companion Loan Holder, on the day such deposit or remittance was first required to be made, which failure is not remedied within one business day or (ii) any failure by the Master Servicer to deposit into, or remit to the Certificate Administrator for deposit into, the Distribution Account any amount required to be so deposited or remitted, which failure is not remedied by 11:00 a.m., New York City time, on the relevant Distribution Date;

(b)     any failure by the Special Servicer to deposit into any REO Account within two business days after the day such deposit is required to be made, or to remit to the Master Servicer for deposit in the Collection Account or any Loan Combination Custodial Account such remittance required to be made by the Special Servicer within one business day after such remittance is required to be made, under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement;

(c)     any failure by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer duly to observe or perform in any material respect any of its other covenants or obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which failure continues unremedied for 30 days (10 days in the case of the Master Servicer’s failure to make a Property Advance or 20 days in the case of a failure to pay the premium for any insurance policy required to be maintained under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or such shorter period (not less than two business days) as may be required to avoid the commencement of foreclosure proceedings for unpaid real estate taxes or the lapse of insurance, as applicable) after written notice of the failure has been given to the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, by any other party to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, or to the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, with a copy to each other party to the related Pooling and Servicing Agreement, by Certificateholders of any Class, evidencing, as to that Class, not less than 25% of the Voting Rights allocable thereto (considering each Class of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates together with the Class PEZ Component with the same alphabetical designation as a single “Class” for such purpose), or, if affected thereby, by the Serviced Companion Loan Holder; provided, however, if that failure is capable of being cured and the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, is diligently pursuing that cure, that 30-day period will be extended an additional 60 days (provided that the Master Servicer, or the Special Servicer, as applicable, has commenced to cure such failure within the initial 30-day period and has certified that it has diligently pursued, and is continuing to pursue, a full cure);

(d)     any breach on the part of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer of any representation or warranty in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which materially and adversely affects the interests of any Class of Certificateholders or a Serviced Companion Loan Holder, as applicable, and which continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after the date on which notice of that breach, requiring the same to be remedied, has been given to the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, by the Depositor, the Certificate Administrator or the Trustee, or to the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Depositor, the Certificate Administrator and the Trustee by the holders of Certificates entitled to not less than

S-303

25% of the Voting Rights, or, if affected thereby, by the Serviced Companion Loan Holder; provided, however, if that breach is capable of being cured and the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, is diligently pursuing that cure, that 30-day period will be extended an additional 60 days (provided that the Master Servicer, or the Special Servicer, as applicable, has commenced to cure such failure within the initial 30-day period and has certified that it has diligently pursued, and is continuing to pursue, a full cure);

(e)     certain events of insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshaling of assets and liabilities or similar proceedings in respect of or relating to the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, and certain actions by or on behalf of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer indicating its insolvency or inability to pay its obligations;

(f)     Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) (or, in the case of Serviced Companion Loan Securities, any Companion Loan Rating Agency) has (i) qualified, downgraded or withdrawn its rating or ratings of one or more Classes of Certificates or Serviced Companion Loan Securities, or (ii) placed one or more Classes of Certificates or Serviced Companion Loan Securities on “watch status” in contemplation of rating downgrade or withdrawal and, in the case of either of clauses (i) or (ii), publicly citing servicing concerns with the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, as the sole or material factor in such rating action (and such qualification, downgrade, withdrawal or “watch status” placement has not been withdrawn by such Rating Agency (or, in the case of Serviced Companion Loan Securities, such Companion Loan Rating Agency) within 60 days of such event);

(g)     the Master Servicer ceases to have a commercial master servicer rating of at least “CMS3” from Fitch Ratings, Inc. (“Fitch”) and that rating is not reinstated within 60 days or the Special Servicer ceases to have a commercial special servicer rating of at least “CSS3” from Fitch and that rating is not reinstated within 60 days, as the case may be;

(h)     either (A) the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, has failed to maintain a ranking by Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC (“Morningstar”) equal to or higher than “MOR CS3” as a master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, and such ranking is not reinstated within 60 days of such event (if the Master Servicer or Special Servicer has or had a Morningstar ranking on or after the Closing Date) or (B) if the Master Servicer or Special Servicer, as the case may be, has not been ranked by Morningstar on or after the Closing Date, and Morningstar has (i) qualified, downgraded or withdrawn its rating or ratings of one or more Classes of Certificates or one or more classes of Serviced Companion Loan Securities or (ii) within the prior twelve (12) months, placed one or more Classes of Certificates or one or more classes of Serviced Companion Loan Securities on “watch status” in contemplation of rating downgrade or withdrawal and, in the case of either of clauses (i) or (ii), has publicly cited servicing concerns with the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, as the sole or material factor in such rating action (and such qualification, downgrade, withdrawal or “watch status” placement has not been withdrawn by Morningstar within 60 days of such event); or

(i)     the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, or any primary servicer or sub-servicer appointed by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, after the Closing Date (but excluding any primary servicer or sub-servicer which the Master Servicer has been instructed to retain by the Depositor or a Sponsor), (i) fails to deliver the items required by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement after any applicable notice and cure period to enable the Certificate Administrator or Depositor to comply with the Issuing Entity’s reporting obligations under the Exchange Act or (ii) for so long as the trust created pursuant to the securitization of a Serviced Companion Loan is subject to the reporting requirements of Regulation AB or the Exchange Act, fails to deliver any Exchange Act reporting items required to be delivered by such servicer pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement at the times required under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement after any applicable notice and cure periods (and any primary servicer or sub-servicer that defaults in accordance with this clause may be terminated at the direction of the Depositor).

“Serviced Companion Loan Securities” mean any commercial mortgage-backed securities that evidence an interest in or are secured by the assets of an issuing entity, which assets include a Serviced Companion Loan (or a portion of or interest in a Serviced Companion Loan).

“Companion Loan Rating Agency” means, with respect to any Serviced Companion Loan, any rating agency that was engaged by a participant in the securitization of such Serviced Companion Loan to assign a rating to the related Serviced Companion Loan Securities.

S-304

Rights Upon Servicer Termination Event

If a Servicer Termination Event with respect to the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer is continuing and has not been remedied, then either (i) the Trustee may or (ii) upon the written direction of the holders of Certificates evidencing at least 25% of the aggregate Voting Rights of all Certificates (or, solely in the case of a Serviced Loan Combination only, subject to the discussion below, upon the written direction of the affected Serviced Companion Loan Holder) to the Trustee, the Trustee will be required to, terminate all of the rights and obligations of the Master Servicer as master servicer or the Special Servicer as special servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and in and to the Issuing Entity (except in its capacity as a Certificateholder). Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon any termination of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer will continue to be entitled to any rights that accrued prior to the date of such termination (including the right to receive all accrued and unpaid servicing and special servicing compensation through the date of termination plus reimbursement for all Advances and interest on such Advances as provided in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement).

On and after the date of termination following a Servicer Termination Event by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, the Trustee will succeed to all authority and power of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and will be entitled to the compensation arrangements to which the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, would have been entitled (unless previously earned by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be). If the Trustee is unwilling or unable so to act, or if the holders of Certificates evidencing at least 25% of the aggregate Voting Rights of all Certificateholders so request, or if the Rating Agencies do not provide a Rating Agency Confirmation with respect to the Trustee so acting, the Trustee must appoint, or petition a court of competent jurisdiction for the appointment of, a mortgage loan servicing institution to act as successor to the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; provided a Rating Agency Confirmation must be obtained regarding appointment of the proposed successor at the expense of the terminated Master Servicer or Special Servicer, as applicable, or, if the expense is not so recovered, at the expense of the Issuing Entity; provided, further, that, the related Outside Controlling Note Holder will have the right to approve a successor Special Servicer with respect to any Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination, and prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Controlling Class Representative will have the right to approve a successor Special Servicer with respect to the other Serviced Loans. Pending such appointment, the Trustee is obligated to act in such capacity in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Trustee and any such successor may agree upon the servicing compensation to be paid; provided, however, that the servicing compensation may not be in excess of that permitted to the terminated Master Servicer or Special Servicer, as applicable, unless no successor can be obtained to perform the obligations for that compensation; and provided, further, that, for so long as no Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the Trustee will be required to consult with the Controlling Class Representative (and, if a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination is affected, the Trustee will be required to consult with the related Outside Controlling Note Holder) prior to the appointment of a successor Master Servicer or Special Servicer at a servicing compensation in excess of that permitted to the terminated Master Servicer or Special Servicer, as applicable. Any compensation in excess of that payable to the predecessor Master Servicer or the Special Servicer may result in Realized Losses or other shortfalls on the Certificates.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, (1) if any Servicer Termination Event on the part of the Master Servicer affects a Serviced Companion Loan, the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder or the rating on a class of the related Serviced Companion Loan Securities, and if the Master Servicer is not otherwise terminated, or (2) if a Servicer Termination Event on the part of the Master Servicer affects only a Serviced Companion Loan, the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder or the rating on a class of related Serviced Companion Loan Securities, then the Master Servicer may not be terminated by or at the direction of the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder or the holders of any Certificates, but upon the written direction of the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder, the Master Servicer will be required to appoint a sub-servicer that will be responsible for servicing the related Serviced Loan Combination. Also, notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Servicer Termination Event described in clauses (a), (b), (c), (d), (f), (g) or (h) under “—Servicer Termination Events” on the part of the Special Servicer affects only a Serviced Companion Loan, a Serviced Companion Loan Holder or a rating on any Serviced Companion Loan Securities, then it will not be a Servicer Termination Event with respect to the Mortgage Pool as a whole, but the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder may terminate the Special Servicer with respect to the related Serviced Loan Combination.

S-305

Notwithstanding the foregoing discussion in this “—Rights Upon Servicer Termination Event” section, if the Master Servicer is terminated under the circumstances described above because of the occurrence of any of the Servicer Termination Events described in clause (f), (g) or (h) under “—Servicer Termination Events” above, the Master Servicer will have the right for a period of 45 days (during which time it will continue to serve as Master Servicer), at its expense, to sell its master servicing rights with respect to the Mortgage Loans to a Master Servicer as to which the Rating Agencies have provided a Rating Agency Confirmation.

No Certificateholder will have any right under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to institute any proceeding with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or the Mortgage Loans, unless, with respect to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, such holder previously has given to the Trustee a written notice of a default under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and of the continuance of the default, and unless also the holders of at least 25% of the Voting Rights of any Class affected thereby (considering each of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates together with the Class PEZ Component of the same alphabetical designation as a single “Class” for such purpose) have made written request of the Trustee (with a copy to the Certificate Administrator) to institute such proceeding in its own name as Trustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and have offered to the Trustee such reasonable indemnity as it may require against the costs, expenses and liabilities to be incurred in connection with such proceeding, and the Trustee, for 60 days after its receipt of such notice, request and offer of indemnity, has neglected or refused to institute such proceeding.

The Trustee will have no obligation to make any investigation of matters arising under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or to institute, conduct or defend any litigation under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or in relation to it at the request, order or direction of any of the holders of Certificates, unless such holders of Certificates have offered to the Trustee security or indemnity reasonably satisfactory to it against the costs, expenses and liabilities which may be incurred in connection with such action.

In addition, the Depositor may terminate each of the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer upon five business days’ notice if the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, fails to comply with certain of its reporting obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

Waivers of Servicer Termination Events

A Servicer Termination Event may be waived by the Certificateholders evidencing not less than 66-2/3% of the aggregate Voting Rights of the Certificates (and, if such Servicer Termination Event is on the part of a Special Servicer with respect to a Serviced Loan Combination only, by the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder). Notwithstanding the foregoing, (1) a Servicer Termination Event under clause (a) or (b) under “—Servicer Termination Events” above may be waived only with the consent of all of the Certificateholders of the affected Classes (considering each of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates together with the Class PEZ Component of the same alphabetical designation as a single “Class” for such purpose), and (2) a Servicer Termination Event under clause (i) under “—Servicer Termination Events” above may be waived only with the consent of the Depositor, together with (in the case of each of clauses (1) and (2) of this sentence) the consent of any Serviced Companion Loan Holder affected by such Servicer Termination Event. If a Servicer Termination Event on the part of the Master Servicer is waived in connection with a Serviced Loan Combination, the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder may require that the Master Servicer appoint a sub-servicer to service the related Serviced Loan Combination, which sub-servicer is the subject of a Rating Agency Confirmation.

Termination of the Special Servicer

The Special Servicer may be removed, and a successor Special Servicer appointed, at any time, as follows:

(a)     if a Control Termination Event has not occurred (or has occurred, but is no longer continuing), the Special Servicer may be removed and replaced as Special Servicer with respect to the Serviced Loans (excluding any Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination and any Excluded Mortgage Loan) (a) for cause at any time and (b) without cause if either (i) LNR Partners, LLC or an affiliate thereof is no longer the Special Servicer or (ii) LNR Securities Holdings, LLC or an affiliate thereof owns, as of the date of the delivery of the related notice of termination, less than 15% of the Certificate Principal Amount of the then Controlling Class of Certificates, at the direction of the Controlling Class Representative upon satisfaction of certain conditions specified in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (including the delivery of a Rating Agency Confirmation);

S-306

(b)     if a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the Special Servicer may be removed, with respect to the Serviced Loans (excluding any Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination), in accordance with the procedures set forth below, at the written direction of (a) holders of Certificates (other than Class R Certificates) evidencing at least 75% of the aggregate Voting Rights of the Certificates (other than Class R Certificates) or (b) holders of Non-Reduced Certificates evidencing more than 50% of the Voting Rights of each Class of Non-Reduced Certificates (considering each Class of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates together with the Class PEZ Component with the same alphabetical designation as a single “Class” for such purpose); and

(c)     the Special Servicer may be removed and replaced at any time with or without cause solely with respect to a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination at the direction of the related Outside Controlling Note Holder, upon satisfaction of certain conditions specified in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (including delivery of a Rating Agency Confirmation) and the related Co-Lender Agreement.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Special Servicer is a Borrower Party with respect to any Mortgage Loan or Loan Combination (any such Mortgage Loan or Loan Combination, an “Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage Loan”), the Special Servicer will be required to resign as Special Servicer of that Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage Loan. Prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, if the Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage Loan is not also an Excluded Mortgage Loan, the Controlling Class Representative will be entitled to appoint (and replace with or without cause) a successor special servicer that is not a Borrower Party in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicer”) for the related Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage Loan. If an Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage Loan is also an Excluded Mortgage Loan, the largest Controlling Class Certificateholder (by Certificate Principal Amount) that is not an Excluded Controlling Class Holder will be entitled to appoint (and replace with or without cause) the Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicer for the related Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage Loan in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. If a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, neither the Controlling Class Representative nor any other Controlling Class Certificateholder will be entitled to remove or replace the Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicer with respect to any Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage Loan. If a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing and prior to the occurrence of a Consultation Termination Event, the largest Controlling Class Certificateholder that is not an Excluded Controlling Class Holder will have the right to appoint the Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicer. If neither the Controlling Class Representative nor any Controlling Class Certificateholder is entitled to appoint a replacement special servicer for an Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage Loan, a replacement special servicer will be appointed in the manner described below and as specified in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

If a Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, upon resignation of the Special Servicer with respect to an Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage Loan, at the expense of the Issuing Entity, the Certificate Administrator will be required to promptly provide written notice of such resignation to all Certificateholders by posting such notice on its internet website and the Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicer will be appointed upon the written direction of more than 50% of the Voting Rights of the Certificates that exercise their right to vote (provided that holders of at least 20% of the Voting Rights of the Certificates exercise their right to vote). If such Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicer has not been appointed pursuant to the preceding sentence within 30 days after the Special Servicer has provided its written notice of resignation, the Certificate Administrator will provide written notice to the resigning Special Servicer that such Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicer has not been appointed and such resigning Special Servicer will appoint such Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicer.

If at any time the Special Servicer is no longer a Borrower Party with respect to an Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage Loan, (1) the related Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicer will be required to resign, (2) the related Mortgage Loan or Loan Combination, as the case may be, will no longer be an Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage Loan, (3) the original Special Servicer will become the special servicer again for such Mortgage Loan or Loan Combination, as the case may be, and (4) the original Special Servicer will be entitled to all special servicing compensation with respect to such Mortgage Loan or Loan Combination, as the case may be, earned during such time on and after such Mortgage Loan or Loan Combination, as the case may be, is no longer an Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage Loan.

The Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicer will be required to perform all of the obligations of the Special Servicer for the related Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage Loan and will be entitled to all special servicing

S-307

compensation with respect to such Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage Loan earned during such time as the related Mortgage Loan is an Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage Loan.

The procedures for removing a Special Servicer if a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing will be as follows: upon (i) the written direction of holders of Certificates evidencing at least 25% of the Voting Rights of the Certificates (other than Class R Certificates) requesting a vote to terminate and replace the Special Servicer (with respect to all of the Serviced Loans other than any Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination) with a proposed successor Special Servicer, (ii) payment by such holders to the Certificate Administrator of the reasonable fees and expenses to be incurred by the Certificate Administrator in connection with administering such vote and (iii) delivery by such holders to the Certificate Administrator and the Trustee of a Rating Agency Confirmation addressing the removal and replacement of the Special Servicer (which confirmations will be obtained at the expense of such holders), the Certificate Administrator will be required to promptly provide written notice to all Certificateholders of such request by posting such notice on its internet website and by mailing at their addresses appearing in the certificate register. Upon the written direction of (a) holders of Certificates (other than the Class R Certificates) evidencing at least 75% of the Voting Rights of the Certificates (other than the Class R Certificates) or (b) holders of Non-Reduced Certificates evidencing more than 50% of the Voting Rights of each Class of Non-Reduced Certificates (considering each Class of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates together with the Class PEZ Component with the same alphabetical designation as a single “Class” for such purpose), the Trustee will be required to terminate all of the rights and obligations of the Special Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement with respect to the applicable Serviced Loans and appoint the proposed successor Special Servicer; provided that if that written direction is not provided within 180 days of the initial request for a vote to so terminate and replace the Special Servicer, then that written direction will have no force and effect. The Certificate Administrator will include on each Distribution Date statement a statement that each Certificateholder and beneficial owner of Certificates may access such notices on the Certificate Administrator’s website and each Certificateholder and beneficial owner of Certificates may register to receive email notifications when such notices are posted on the website. Any such appointment of a successor Special Servicer with respect to the Serviced Loans (other than any Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination) based on a Certificateholder vote will be subject to the receipt of a Rating Agency Confirmation. The Certificate Administrator will be entitled to reimbursement from the requesting Certificateholders for the reasonable expenses of posting notices of such requests.

In addition, any time after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, if the Operating Advisor determines that the Special Servicer is not performing its duties as required under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or is otherwise not acting in accordance with the Servicing Standard, the Operating Advisor will have the right to recommend the replacement of the Special Servicer with respect to the Serviced Loans. In any such event, the Operating Advisor will be required to deliver to the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator, with a copy to the Special Servicer, a written recommendation detailing the reasons supporting its position (along with relevant information justifying its recommendation) and recommending a replacement Special Servicer meeting the applicable requirements of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which recommended special servicer has agreed to succeed the then-current Special Servicer with respect to the applicable Serviced Loans if appointed in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Certificate Administrator will be required to promptly post a copy of such recommendation on its internet website and by mail send notice to all Certificateholders, asking them to indicate whether they wish to remove the Special Servicer. Upon the written direction (as evidenced by votes cast) of holders of Non-Reduced Certificates evidencing more than 50% of the Voting Rights of each Class of Non-Reduced Certificates (considering each Class of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates together with the Class PEZ Component with the same alphabetical designation as a single “Class” for such purpose) within 180 days of the initial request for a vote, and receipt by the Certificate Administrator of a Rating Agency Confirmation from each Rating Agency, the Trustee will terminate all of the rights and obligations of the Special Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement with respect to the applicable Serviced Loans, and appoint the recommended successor Special Servicer. If such written direction of the holders of the required Non-Reduced Certificates is not provided within 180 days of the request for a vote on the removal of the Special Servicer, the recommendation of the Operating Advisor to so remove and replace the Special Servicer will lapse and be of no force and effect. The reasonable fees and out-of-pocket costs and expenses associated with obtaining the Rating Agency Confirmation described above and administering the vote on removal of the Special Servicer will be an additional expense of the Issuing Entity.

In addition, the Depositor may terminate the Special Servicer upon five business days’ notice if the Special Servicer fails to comply with certain of its reporting obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

S-308

In no event may a successor Special Servicer be a current or former Operating Advisor or any affiliate of such current or former Operating Advisor.

Amendment

The Pooling and Servicing Agreement may be amended without the consent of any of the holders of Certificates:

(a)     to cure any ambiguity to the extent that it does not adversely affect any holders of Certificates;

(b)     to correct or supplement any of its provisions which may be inconsistent with any other provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or with the description of the provisions in this prospectus supplement or the prospectus, or to correct any error;

(c)     to change the timing and/or nature of deposits in the Collection Account, the Excess Liquidation Proceeds Reserve Account, the Exchangeable Distribution Account, the Excess Interest Distribution Account, the Distribution Account or any REO Account; provided that (A) the Master Servicer Remittance Date may in no event be later than the business day prior to the related Distribution Date and (B) the change would not adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any Certificateholder, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel (at the expense of the party requesting the amendment);

(d)     to modify, eliminate or add to any of its provisions (i) to the extent necessary to maintain the qualification of either Trust REMIC as a REMIC or the Grantor Trust as a grantor trust or to avoid or minimize the risk of imposition of any tax on the Issuing Entity; provided that the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator have received an opinion of counsel (at the expense of the party requesting the amendment) to the effect that (1) the action is necessary or desirable to maintain such qualification or to avoid or minimize such risk and (2) the action will not adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any holder of the Certificates, (ii) to restrict (or to remove any existing restrictions with respect to) the transfer of the Class R Certificates; provided that the Depositor has determined that the amendment will not give rise to any tax with respect to the transfer of the Class R Certificates to a non-permitted transferee (see “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—REMICs—Tax and Restrictions on Transfers of REMIC Residual Certificates to Particular Organizations” in the prospectus), or (iii) to the extent necessary to comply with the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, the Exchange Act, Regulation AB, and/or any related regulatory actions and/or interpretations;

(e)     to make any other provisions with respect to matters or questions arising under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or any other change; provided that the amendment will not adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any Certificateholder, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel;

(f)     to amend or supplement any provision of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to the extent necessary to maintain the ratings assigned to each Class of Certificates by any Rating Agency; provided that such amendment will not adversely affect in any material respect the interests of any Certificateholder;

(g)     to modify the procedures in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement relating to Rule 17g-5 under the Exchange Act (“Rule 17g-5”); provided that such modification does not increase the obligations of the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Operating Advisor, the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer without such party’s consent (which consent may not be withheld unless the modification would materially adversely affect that party or materially increase that party’s obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement); provided, further, that notice of such modification is provided to all parties to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

(h)     in the event of a TIA Applicability Determination (as defined below), to modify, eliminate or add to the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to the extent necessary to (A) effect the qualification of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement under the TIA or under any similar federal statute hereafter enacted and to add to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement such other provisions as may be expressly required by the TIA, and (B) modify such other provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to the extent necessary to make those provisions consistent with, and conform to, the modifications made pursuant to clause (A).

S-309

Notwithstanding the foregoing, no such amendment to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement contemplated by the first paragraph under this section entitled “—Amendment” will be permitted if the amendment would (i) reduce the consent or consultation rights or the right to receive information under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement of the Controlling Class Representative without the consent of the Controlling Class Representative, (ii) reduce the consultation rights or the right to receive information under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement of the Operating Advisor without the consent of the Operating Advisor, (iii) change in any manner the obligations or rights of any Sponsor under the applicable Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement or the Pooling and Servicing Agreement without the consent of the affected Sponsor, (iv) change in any manner the obligations or rights of any underwriter or initial purchaser of Certificates without the consent of the related underwriter or initial purchaser of Certificates, or (v) adversely affect any Serviced Companion Loan Holder in its capacity as such without its consent.

In a number of cases that have been filed alleging certain violations of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended (the “TIA”), certain lower courts have held that the TIA was applicable to certain agreements similar to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and that the mortgage-backed certificates issued pursuant to such agreements were not exempt under Section 304(a)(2) of the TIA. (See for example, Retirement Board of the Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago v. The Bank of New York Mellon, 11 Civ. 5459 (WHP) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 3, 2012), Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago v. Bank of America, et.al, 12 Civ. 2865 (KBF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2012) and American Fidelity Assurance Co. v. Bank of New York Mellon, No. Civ-11-1284-D (W.D. Okla. December 26, 2013)). These rulings are contrary to more than three decades of market practice, as well as guidance regarding Section 304(a)(2) of the TIA that had previously been provided by the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance and that, prior to April 24, 2015, had been posted on the SEC’s website as Division of Corporation Finance Interpretive Response 202.01 (“CDI 202.01”). See also Harbor Financial, Inc., 1988 SEC No-Act. LEXIS 1463 (Oct. 31, 1988) (in which the SEC staff agreed that certificates evidencing an interest in a pool of mortgage loans could be issued without qualification of the issuing instrument under the TIA). In addition, on December 23, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the lower court’s ruling in Retirement Bd. of the Policemen’s Annuity regarding the applicability of the TIA to trusts governed by pooling and servicing agreements under New York law, holding that the mortgaged-backed securities at issue are exempt under Section 304(a)(2) of the TIA. The plaintiffs/appellants in that case filed a petition for rehearing en banc with the Second Circuit, which was denied on April 13, 2015, and such plaintiffs/appellants filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court on September 10, 2015. On April 24, 2015, CDI 202.01 was withdrawn by the SEC staff without any indication of the reason for such withdrawal. If the American Fidelity Assurance Company case is affirmed on appeal, there would be a split in the United States circuit courts regarding this issue. In addition, if the Supreme Court grants certiorari in the Retirement Bd. of the Policemen’s Annuity case and reverses the Second Circuit decision, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement may be required to be qualified under the TIA.

In the event that subsequent to the date of this prospectus supplement the Depositor, upon consultation with the Trustee, has determined that the TIA does apply to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or that that qualification under the TIA or any similar federal statute hereafter enacted is required (a “TIA Applicability Determination”), the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will provide that it will be amended without the consent of any Certificateholder to the extent necessary to comply with the TIA. In addition, if the TIA were to apply to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the TIA provides that certain provisions would automatically be deemed to be included in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (and the Pooling and Servicing Agreement thus would be statutorily amended without any further action); provided, however, that it will be deemed that the parties to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement have agreed that, to the extent permitted under the TIA, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will expressly exclude any non-mandatory provisions that (x) conflict with the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or would otherwise alter the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or (y) increase the obligations, liabilities or scope of responsibility of any party to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. Generally, the TIA provisions include additional obligations of the Trustee, certain additional reporting requirements, and heightened conflict of interest rules which may require, for example, that the Trustee resign in the event the interests of the holders of the various classes of Certificates differ from one another under certain circumstances and that one or more other trustees be appointed in its place. While investors should understand the potential for such amendments, investors should not purchase Certificates with any expectation that the TIA will be determined to apply or that any such amendments will be made.

The Pooling and Servicing Agreement may also be amended by the parties to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement with the consent of the holders of Certificates evidencing not less than 66⅔% of the aggregate Percentage Interests of each Class affected by the amendment for the purpose of adding any provisions to or changing in any manner or eliminating any of the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or of

S-310

modifying in any manner the rights of the holders of the Certificates, except that the amendment may not (1) reduce in any manner the amount of, or delay the timing of, payments received on the Serviced Loans which are required to be distributed on a Certificate of any Class without the consent of the holder of that Certificate, or that are required to be distributed to a Serviced Companion Loan Holder without its consent, (2) reduce the percentage of Certificates of any Class the holders of which are required to consent to the amendment without the consent of the holders of all Certificates of that Class then outstanding, (3) change in any manner the obligations or rights of any Sponsor under the applicable Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement or the Pooling and Servicing Agreement without the consent of the related Sponsor, (4) change the definition of “Servicing Standard” without either (a) the consent of 100% of the Certificateholders or (b) a Rating Agency Confirmation, (5) without the consent of 100% of the Certificateholders of the Class or Classes of Certificates adversely affected thereby, change (a) the percentages of Voting Rights of Certificateholders which are required to consent to any action or inaction under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (b) the right of the Certificateholders to remove the Special Servicer or (c) the right of the Certificateholders to terminate the Operating Advisor, (6) adversely affect the Controlling Class Representative without the consent of 100% of the Controlling Class Certificateholders, (7) change in any manner the obligations or rights of any underwriter without the consent of the affected underwriter, or (8) adversely affect any Serviced Companion Loan Holder in its capacity as such without its consent.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement may not be amended without the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Custodian (if the Trustee is then acting as Custodian) and/or the Certificate Administrator (in each case, only if requested by such party) having first received an opinion of counsel, at the expense of the person requesting the amendment (or, if the amendment is required by any Rating Agency to maintain the rating issued by it or requested by the Trustee or the Certificate Administrator for any purpose described in clause (a) or clause (b) of the first paragraph of this section entitled “—Amendment”, then at the expense of the Issuing Entity), to the effect that the amendment will not result in the imposition of a tax on any portion of the Issuing Entity (other than a tax at the highest marginal corporate tax rate on net income from foreclosure property pursuant to Code Section 860G(c)) or cause either Trust REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC or the Grantor Trust to fail to qualify as a grantor trust for federal income tax purposes. The party requesting an amendment to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will be required to give each Rating Agency prior written notice of such amendment.

Certain amendments to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement may require the delivery of certain opinions of counsel at the expense of the Issuing Entity. In addition, prior to the execution of any amendment to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Trustee, the Custodian (if the Trustee is then acting as Custodian), the Certificate Administrator, the Special Servicer and the Master Servicer may request and will be entitled to rely conclusively upon an opinion of counsel, at the expense of the party requesting such amendment (or, if such amendment is required by any Rating Agency to maintain the rating issued by it or requested by the Trustee or the Certificate Administrator for any purpose described in clause (a), (b), (c) or (e) (which does not modify or otherwise relate solely to the obligations, duties or rights of the Trustee or the Certificate Administrator, as applicable) of the first paragraph of this section entitled “—Amendment”, then at the expense of the Issuing Entity) stating that the execution of such amendment is authorized or permitted by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and that all conditions precedent to such amendment are satisfied.

Realization Upon Mortgage Loans

Specially Serviced Loans; Appraisals

Promptly upon the occurrence of an Appraisal Reduction Event with respect to a Serviced Loan, the Special Servicer will be required to use reasonable efforts to obtain an appraisal of the Mortgaged Property or REO Property, as the case may be, from an Appraiser in accordance with MAI standards (an “Updated Appraisal”). However, the Special Servicer will not be required to obtain an Updated Appraisal of any Mortgaged Property with respect to which there exists an appraisal from an Appraiser in accordance with MAI standards which is less than nine months old, unless the Special Servicer determines that such previously obtained Appraisal is materially inaccurate. The cost of any Updated Appraisal will be advanced by, and reimbursable to, the Master Servicer as a Property Advance or will be an expense of the Issuing Entity and paid out of the Collection Account if determined to be a Non-Recoverable Advance to the extent provided in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

S-311

Standards for Conduct Generally in Effecting Foreclosure or the Sale of Defaulted Loans

In connection with any foreclosure, enforcement of the related Mortgage Loan documents, or other acquisition, the cost and expenses of any such proceeding will be a Property Advance or an expense of the Issuing Entity and paid out of the Collection Account if determined to be a Non-Recoverable Advance.

If the Special Servicer elects to proceed with a non-judicial foreclosure in accordance with the laws of the state where the Mortgaged Property is located, the Special Servicer will not be required to pursue a deficiency judgment against the related borrower, if available, or any other liable party if the laws of the state do not permit such a deficiency judgment after a non-judicial foreclosure or if the Special Servicer determines, in accordance with the Servicing Standard, that the likely recovery if a deficiency judgment is obtained will not be sufficient to warrant the cost, time, expense and/or exposure of pursuing the deficiency judgment and such determination is evidenced by an officers’ certificate delivered to the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, any related Outside Controlling Note Holder and (prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event) the Controlling Class Representative.

Notwithstanding anything in this prospectus supplement to the contrary, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will provide that the Special Servicer will not, on behalf of the Issuing Entity or a related Serviced Companion Loan Holder, obtain title to a Mortgaged Property as a result of foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or otherwise, and will not otherwise acquire possession of, or take any other action with respect to, any Mortgaged Property if, as a result of any such action, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Issuing Entity or the holders of Certificates or a related Serviced Companion Loan Holder would be considered to hold title to, to be a “mortgagee-in-possession” of, or to be an “owner” or “operator” of, such Mortgaged Property within the meaning of the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, or any comparable law, unless the Special Servicer has previously determined, based on an updated environmental assessment report prepared by an independent person who regularly conducts environmental audits, that: (i) such Mortgaged Property is in compliance with applicable environmental laws or, if not, after consultation with an environmental consultant, that it would be in the best economic interest of the Issuing Entity and, if applicable, a related Serviced Companion Loan Holder (as a collective whole) to take such actions as are necessary to bring such Mortgaged Property in compliance with applicable environmental laws and (ii) there are no circumstances present at such Mortgaged Property relating to the use, management or disposal of any hazardous materials for which investigation, testing, monitoring, containment, clean-up or remediation could be required under any currently effective federal, state or local law or regulation, or that, if any such hazardous materials are present for which such action could be required, after consultation with an environmental consultant it would be in the best economic interest of the Issuing Entity and any related Serviced Companion Loan Holder (as a collective whole as if the Issuing Entity and, if applicable, such Serviced Companion Loan Holder(s) constituted a single lender (and, with respect to a Serviced AB Loan Combination, taking into account the subordinate nature of the related Subordinate Companion Loan)) to take such actions with respect to the affected Mortgaged Property as could be required by such law or regulation. If appropriate, the Special Servicer may establish a single member limited liability company with the Issuing Entity and, if applicable, a related Serviced Companion Loan Holder, as the sole owner to hold title to the Mortgaged Property.

In the event that title to any Mortgaged Property is acquired in foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, the deed or certificate of sale is required to be issued to the Trustee, to a co-trustee or to its nominee or a separate trustee or co-trustee on behalf of the Trustee, on behalf of holders of Certificates and, if applicable, the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder. Notwithstanding any such acquisition of title and cancellation of the related Serviced Loan, the related Serviced Mortgage Loan will generally be considered to be an REO Mortgage Loan held in the Issuing Entity until such time as the related REO Property is sold by the Issuing Entity.

If title to any Mortgaged Property is acquired by the Issuing Entity (directly or through a single member limited liability company established for that purpose), the Special Servicer will be required to sell the Mortgaged Property prior to the close of the third calendar year beginning after the year of acquisition, unless (1) the IRS grants (or does not deny) an extension of time to sell the property or (2) the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator and the Trustee receive an opinion of independent counsel to the effect that the holding of the property by the Lower-Tier REMIC longer than the above-referenced three year period will not result in the imposition of a tax on either Trust REMIC or cause either Trust REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC under the Code at any time that any Certificate is outstanding. Subject to the foregoing and any other tax-related limitations, pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Special Servicer will generally be required to attempt to sell any Mortgaged Property so acquired in accordance with the Servicing Standard. The Special

S-312

Servicer will also be required to ensure that any Mortgaged Property acquired by the Issuing Entity is administered so that it constitutes “foreclosure property” within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(8) at all times, and that the sale of the property does not result in the receipt by the Issuing Entity of any income from nonpermitted assets as described in Code Section 860F(a)(2)(B). If the Lower-Tier REMIC acquires title to any Mortgaged Property, the Special Servicer, on behalf of the Lower-Tier REMIC, will retain, at the expense of the Issuing Entity, an independent contractor to manage and operate the property. The independent contractor generally will be permitted to perform construction (including renovation) on a foreclosed property only if the construction was more than 10% completed at the time default on the related Mortgage Loan became imminent. The retention of an independent contractor, however, will not relieve the Special Servicer of its obligation to manage the Mortgaged Property as required under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

Generally, neither Trust REMIC will be taxable on income received with respect to a Mortgaged Property acquired by the Issuing Entity to the extent that it constitutes “rents from real property,” within the meaning of Code Section 856(c)(3)(A) and Treasury regulations under the Code. Rents from real property include fixed rents and rents based on the gross receipts or sales of a tenant but do not include the portion of any rental based on the net income or profit of any tenant or sub-tenant. No determination has been made whether rent on any of the Mortgaged Properties meets this requirement. Rents from real property include charges for services customarily furnished or rendered in connection with the rental of real property, whether or not the charges are separately stated. Services furnished to the tenants of a particular building will be considered as customary if, in the geographic market in which the building is located, tenants in buildings which are of similar class are customarily provided with the service. No determination has been made whether the services furnished to the tenants of the Mortgaged Properties are “customary” within the meaning of applicable regulations. It is therefore possible that a portion of the rental income with respect to a Mortgaged Property owned by the Issuing Entity would not constitute rents from real property, or that none of such income would qualify if a separate charge is not stated for such non-customary services or they are not performed by an independent contractor. Rents from real property also do not include income from the operation of a trade or business on the Mortgaged Property, such as a hospitality property or rental income attributable to personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property if the rent attributable to personal property exceeds 15% of the total net rent for the taxable year. Any of the foregoing types of income may instead constitute “net income from foreclosure property,” which would be taxable to the Lower-Tier REMIC, at the highest marginal federal corporate rate and may also be subject to state or local taxes. The Pooling and Servicing Agreement provides that the Special Servicer will be permitted to cause the Lower-Tier REMIC to earn “net income from foreclosure property” that is subject to tax if it determines that the net after-tax benefit to Certificateholders and any related Serviced Companion Loan Holders, as a collective whole, could reasonably be expected to be greater than another method of operating or net leasing the Mortgaged Property. Because these sources of income, if they exist, are already in place with respect to the Mortgaged Properties, it is generally viewed as beneficial to Certificateholders to permit the Issuing Entity to continue to earn them if it acquires a Mortgaged Property, even at the cost of this tax. These taxes would be chargeable against the related income for purposes of determining the proceeds available for distribution to holders of Certificates. See “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—REMICs—Prohibited Transactions Tax and Other Taxes” in the prospectus.

To the extent that Liquidation Proceeds collected with respect to any Mortgage Loan are less than the sum of (1) the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan, (2) interest accrued on the Mortgage Loan and (3) the aggregate amount of outstanding reimbursable expenses (including any (i) unpaid servicing compensation, (ii) unreimbursed Property Advances, (iii) accrued and unpaid interest on all Advances and (iv) additional expenses of the Issuing Entity) incurred with respect to the Mortgage Loan, the Issuing Entity will realize a loss in the amount of the shortfall. The Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Master Servicer and/or the Special Servicer will be entitled to reimbursement out of the Liquidation Proceeds recovered on any Mortgage Loan or Serviced Loan Combination, prior to the distribution of those Liquidation Proceeds to Certificateholders or Serviced Companion Loan Holders, of any and all amounts that represent unpaid servicing compensation in respect of the related Mortgage Loan or Serviced Loan Combination, certain unreimbursed expenses incurred with respect to the Mortgage Loan or Serviced Loan Combination and any unreimbursed Advances (including interest on Advances) made with respect to the Mortgage Loan or Serviced Loan Combination. In addition, amounts otherwise distributable on the Certificates will be further reduced by interest payable to the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or Trustee on these Advances.

Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties

Promptly upon a Serviced Loan becoming a Defaulted Mortgage Loan and if the Special Servicer determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that it would be in the best interests of the Certificateholders and, in

S-313

the case of a Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination, any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and, in the case of a Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination, any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder, constituted a single lender) to attempt to sell such Serviced Loan, the Special Servicer will be required to use reasonable efforts to solicit offers for the Defaulted Mortgage Loan on behalf of the Certificateholders and, if applicable, any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder in such manner as will be reasonably likely to realize a fair price. The Special Servicer will generally be required to accept the first (and, if multiple offers are contemporaneously received, the highest) cash offer received from any person that constitutes a fair price for the Defaulted Mortgage Loan. The Special Servicer is required to notify, among others, the Controlling Class Representative (prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event), any related Outside Controlling Note Holder and the Operating Advisor (after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event) of any inquiries or offers received regarding the sale of any Defaulted Mortgage Loan.

The Special Servicer will be required to determine whether any cash offer constitutes a fair price for any Defaulted Mortgage Loan if the highest offeror is a person other than an Interested Person. In determining whether any offer from a person other than an Interested Person constitutes a fair price for any Defaulted Mortgage Loan, the Special Servicer will be required to take into account (in addition to the results of any appraisal, updated appraisal or narrative appraisal that it may have obtained pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement within the prior nine months), and in determining whether any offer from an Interested Person constitutes a fair price for any Defaulted Mortgage Loan, any Appraiser will be instructed to take into account, as applicable, among other factors, the period and amount of any delinquency on the affected Mortgage Loan, the occupancy level and physical condition of the related Mortgaged Property and the state of the local economy.

If the highest offeror is an Interested Person (provided that the Trustee may not be an offeror), then the Trustee will be required to determine whether the cash offer constitutes a fair price. However, no offer from an Interested Person will constitute a fair price unless (i) it is the highest offer received and (ii) at least two other offers are received from independent third parties. In determining whether any offer received from an Interested Person represents a fair price for any such Defaulted Mortgage Loan, the Trustee will be supplied with and will be required to rely on the most recent appraisal or updated appraisal conducted in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement within the preceding nine month period or, in the absence of any such appraisal, on a new appraisal. Except as provided in the following paragraph, the cost of any appraisal will be covered by, and will be reimbursable as, a Property Advance.

Notwithstanding anything contained in the preceding paragraph to the contrary, if the Trustee is required to determine whether a cash offer by an Interested Person constitutes a fair price, the Trustee may (at its option and at the expense of the Interested Person) designate an independent third party expert in real estate or commercial mortgage loan matters with at least five years’ experience in valuing or investing in loans similar to the subject Serviced Loan that has been selected with reasonable care by the Trustee to determine if such cash offer constitutes a fair price for such Serviced Loan. If the Trustee designates such a third party to make such determination, the Trustee will be entitled to rely conclusively upon such third party’s determination. The reasonable costs of all appraisals, inspection reports and broker opinions of value incurred by any such third party pursuant to this paragraph will be covered by, and will be reimbursable by the Interested Person; provided, that the Trustee will not engage a third party expert whose fees exceed a commercially reasonable amount as determined by the Trustee.

The Repurchase Price will be deemed a fair price in all events.

With respect to any Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination (other than any such Loan Combination that is a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination), pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, if such Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination becomes a Defaulted Mortgage Loan, and if the Special Servicer determines to sell the related Serviced Mortgage Loan in accordance with the discussion in this “—Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties” section, then the Special Servicer will be required to sell each related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan together with such Serviced Mortgage Loan as a single whole loan in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and subject to any rights of the related Directing Holder and/or the holder of any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or under the related Co-Lender Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Special Servicer will not be permitted to sell any such Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination if it becomes a Defaulted Mortgage Loan without the written consent of each related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder

S-314

(provided that such consent is not required if the consenting party is the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower) unless the Special Servicer has delivered to such related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder: (a) at least 15 business days’ prior written notice of any decision to attempt to sell such Loan Combination; (b) at least ten days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of each bid package (together with any material amendments to such bid packages) received by the Special Servicer in connection with any such proposed sale; (c) at least ten days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of the most recent appraisal for the subject Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination, and any documents in the servicing file reasonably requested by such related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder that are material to the price of the subject Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination; and (d) until the sale is completed, and a reasonable period of time (but no less time than is afforded to other offerors) prior to the proposed sale date, all information and other documents being provided to other offerors and all leases or other documents that are approved by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer in connection with the proposed sale; provided, that a related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder may waive as to itself any of the delivery or timing requirements set forth in this sentence. The Controlling Class Representative and each related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder will be permitted to submit an offer at any sale of the subject Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination unless such person is the borrower or an agent or affiliate of the borrower. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” above in this prospectus supplement.

With respect to any Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination that is a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination, pursuant to the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement, if such Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination becomes a Defaulted Mortgage Loan, and if the Special Servicer determines to sell the related Serviced Mortgage Loan in accordance with the discussion in this “—Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties” section, then the Special Servicer will be required to sell the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan together with such Serviced Mortgage Loan as a single whole loan in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and subject to any rights of the related Directing Holder, the Controlling Class Representative and/or the holder of any related non-controlling Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or under the related Co-Lender Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Special Servicer will not be permitted to sell any such Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination if it becomes a Defaulted Mortgage Loan without the written consent of the Controlling Class Representative (unless a Consultation Termination Event exists), the related Outside Controlling Note Holder and the holder of each related non-controlling Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan (provided that such consent is not required if the consenting party is the borrower or an affiliate of the borrower) unless the Special Servicer has delivered to the Controlling Class Representative, the related Outside Controlling Note Holder and the holder of each related non-controlling Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan: (a) at least 15 business days’ prior written notice of any decision to attempt to sell such Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination; (b) at least ten days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of each bid package (together with any material amendments to such bid packages) received by the Special Servicer in connection with any such proposed sale; (c) at least ten days prior to the proposed sale date, a copy of the most recent appraisal for the subject Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination, and any documents in the servicing file reasonably requested by the Controlling Class Representative and the related Outside Controlling Note Holder that are material to the price of the subject Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination; and (d) until the sale is completed, and a reasonable period of time (but no less time than is afforded to other offerors and the Controlling Class Representative) prior to the proposed sale date, all information and other documents being provided to other offerors and all leases or other documents that are approved by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer in connection with the proposed sale; provided, that the Controlling Class Representative, the related Outside Controlling Note Holder and the holder of each related non-controlling Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan may each waive as to itself any of the delivery or timing requirements set forth in this sentence.  The Controlling Class Representative, the related Outside Controlling Note Holder and the holder of each related non-controlling Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan will be permitted to submit an offer at any sale of the subject Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination unless such person is the borrower or an agent or affiliate of the borrower.  See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” above in this prospectus supplement.

With respect to any Serviced AB Loan Combination, pursuant to the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, if the related Serviced Mortgage Loan becomes a Defaulted Mortgage Loan, and if the Special Servicer determines to sell such Serviced Mortgage Loan in accordance with the discussion in this “—Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties” section, then the Special Servicer will be permitted to sell the related Serviced Subordinate Companion Loan together with such Serviced Mortgage Loan and any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan as a single whole loan, provided that the Special Servicer has received prior written consent from the holder of such Subordinate Companion Loan.

S-315

If an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan becomes the equivalent of a Defaulted Mortgage Loan and the Outside Special Servicer elects to sell any promissory note evidencing a portion of the related Outside Serviced Loan Combination, the Outside Special Servicer will be required to sell such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, together with the related Companion Loan(s), as a single whole loan, pursuant to the Outside Servicing Agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations—The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination—Sale of Defaulted Loan Combination”, and “—The Loan Combinations—The Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination—Sale of Defaulted Loan Combination” in this prospectus supplement.

The Special Servicer is required to use reasonable efforts to solicit offers for each REO Property related to a Serviced Mortgage Loan on behalf of the Certificateholders and any related Serviced Companion Loan Holder, if applicable, and to sell each such REO Property in the same manner as with respect to a Defaulted Mortgage Loan.

Notwithstanding any of the foregoing paragraphs, the Special Servicer will not be required to accept the highest cash offer for a Defaulted Mortgage Loan if the Special Servicer determines (in consultation with the Controlling Class Representative (unless a Consultation Termination Event exists or a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination is involved) and any related Outside Controlling Note Holder (if a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination is involved)), in accordance with the Servicing Standard, that rejection of such offer would be in the best interests of the Certificateholders and, in the case of a sale of a Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination, the related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder(s) (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and, if applicable, any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder(s) constituted a single lender), and the Special Servicer may accept a lower cash offer (from any person other than itself or an affiliate) if it determines, in its reasonable and good faith judgment, that acceptance of such offer would be in the best interests of the Certificateholders and, in the case of a Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination, any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder(s) (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and, if applicable, any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder(s) constituted a single lender).

Notwithstanding any of the foregoing paragraphs, the Special Servicer will not be required to accept the highest cash offer for an REO Property if the Special Servicer determines (in consultation with the related Directing Holder (unless, if the Controlling Class Representative is the related Directing Holder, a Consultation Termination Event exists)), in accordance with the Servicing Standard, that rejection of such offer would be in the best interests of the Certificateholders and, in the case of a sale of an REO Property related to a Serviced Loan Combination, the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder(s) (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and, if applicable, any related Serviced Companion Loan Holder(s) constituted a single lender (and, in the case of a Serviced AB Loan Combination, taking into account the subordinate nature of the related Serviced Subordinate Companion Loan)), and the Special Servicer may accept a lower cash offer (from any person other than itself or an affiliate) if it determines, in its reasonable and good faith judgment, that acceptance of such offer would be in the best interests of the Certificateholders and, in the case of an REO Property related to a Serviced Loan Combination, any related Serviced Companion Loan Holder(s) (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and, if applicable, any related Serviced Companion Loan Holder(s) constituted a single lender (and, in the case of a Serviced AB Loan Combination, taking into account the subordinate nature of the related Serviced Subordinate Companion Loan)).

An “Interested Person” is the Depositor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee, the Controlling Class Representative, any Sponsor, any borrower, any holder of a related mezzanine loan, any manager of a Mortgaged Property, any independent contractor engaged by the Special Servicer or any affiliate of any of the preceding entities, and, with respect to a Defaulted Mortgage Loan that constitutes a Serviced Loan Combination, the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer (or any independent contractor engaged by such special servicer), or the trustee for the securitization of the related Serviced Companion Loan, the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder or its representative, any holder of a related mezzanine loan, or any known affiliate of any such party described above.

Modifications, Waivers and Amendments

The Pooling and Servicing Agreement will permit (a) with respect to any Serviced Loan that is not a Specially Serviced Loan, the Master Servicer (subject to the Special Servicer’s processing and/or consent if the related modification, waiver or amendment constitutes a Special Servicer Decision or Major Decision), or (b) with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan, the Special Servicer, in each case subject to the consultation rights of the Operating Advisor and the consent and/or consultation rights of the related Directing Holder (if any) and, to the

S-316

extent required in accordance with the related Co-Lender Agreement, any related Serviced Companion Loan Holder or its representative, to modify, waive or amend any term of any Serviced Loan if such modification, waiver or amendment (i) is consistent with the Servicing Standard and (ii) would not constitute a “significant modification” of such Serviced Loan pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(b) and would not otherwise (A) cause either Trust REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC or cause the Grantor Trust to fail to qualify as a grantor trust or (B) result in the imposition of a tax upon either Trust REMIC or the Issuing Entity (including but not limited to the tax on “prohibited transactions” as defined in Code Section 860F(a)(2) and the tax on contributions to a REMIC set forth in Code Section 860G(d), but not including the tax on “net income from foreclosure property” under Code Section 860G(c)).

The consent and processing of the Special Servicer is required with respect to any Special Servicer Decisions and Major Decisions with respect to any Serviced Loan that is not a Specially Serviced Loan, and the Special Servicer will process (unless the Special Servicer and the Master Servicer mutually agree that the Master Servicer will process, as further described below) and consent to or refuse consent to, as applicable, all such Special Servicer Decisions and Major Decisions, in each case subject to the consent of the Special Servicer. The Special Servicer will also be required to obtain the consent of the Directing Holder and will be required to consult with the Operating Advisor in connection with any such modification, waiver or amendment, to the extent described under “—The Directing Holder” and “—The Operating Advisor” in this prospectus supplement. With respect to any Serviced Loan that is not a Specially Serviced Loan, the Master Servicer’s determination to consent to or approve a request by a borrower with respect to any Special Servicer Decision or Major Decision with respect to any Mortgage Loan will be subject to the Special Servicer’s processing and consent or, if mutually agreed to by the Special Servicer and the Master Servicer, the Master Servicer will be required to process such request subject to the consent of the Special Servicer as further described below. For purposes of the foregoing and this prospectus supplement, each of the following with respect to any Mortgage Loan constitutes a “Special Servicer Decision”):

(a)        approving leases, lease modifications or amendments or any requests for subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreements or other similar agreements for (i) all ground leases, including any determination whether to cure any borrower defaults relating to any ground lease, and (ii) all other leases in excess of the lesser of (y) 30,000 square feet and (z) 30% of the net rentable area at the related Mortgaged Property so long as it is considered a “major lease” or otherwise reviewable by the lender under the related Mortgage Loan Documents;

(b)        approving any waiver regarding the receipt of financial statements (other than an immaterial timing waiver including late financial statements);

(c)        approving annual budgets for the related Mortgaged Property that provide for (i) operating expenses equal to more than 110% of the amount that was budgeted therefor in the prior year or (ii) payments to affiliates of the related borrower (excluding affiliated managers paid at fee rates agreed to at the origination of the related Mortgage Loan or Loan Combination);

(d)        approving easements that materially affect the use or value of a Mortgaged Property or the borrower’s ability to make payments with respect to the related Mortgage Loan;

(e)        agreeing to any modification, waiver, consent or amendment of the related Mortgage Loan or Loan Combination in connection with a defeasance if such proposed modification, waiver, consent or amendment is with respect to a (i) a waiver of a mortgage loan event of default, (ii) a modification of the type of defeasance collateral required under the Mortgage Loan or Loan Combination documents such that defeasance collateral other than direct, non-callable obligations of the United States would be permitted or (iii) a modification that would permit a principal prepayment instead of defeasance if the applicable loan documents do not otherwise permit such principal prepayment; provided that the foregoing is not otherwise a Major Decision;

(f)        in circumstances where no lender discretion is required other than confirming that the conditions in the related Mortgage Loan Documents have been satisfied (including determining whether any applicable terms or tests are satisfied), any request to incur additional debt in accordance with the terms of the Mortgage Loan Documents;

(g)        any requests for the funding or disbursement of amounts from any escrow accounts, reserve funds or letters of credit held as “performance”, “earn-out” or “holdback” escrows or reserves, including the funding or disbursement of any such amounts with respect to any of the Mortgage Loans secured by the Mortgaged

S-317

Properties specifically identified in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, other than routine and/or customary escrow and reserve fundings or disbursements for which the satisfaction of performance-related criteria is not required pursuant to the terms of the related Mortgage Loan Documents (for the avoidance of doubt, any request for the funding or disbursement of ordinary course impounds, repair and replacement reserves, lender approved budget and operating expenses, and tenant improvements pursuant to an approved lease, each in accordance with the Mortgage Loan Documents or any other funding or disbursement as mutually agreed upon by the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer, will not constitute a Special Servicer Decision);

(h)        in circumstances where no lender discretion is required other than confirming satisfaction of the applicable terms of the Mortgage Loan documents (including determining whether any applicable terms or tests are satisfied), processing requests for any release of collateral or any acceptance of substitute or additional collateral for a Mortgage Loan; provided that, in any case, Special Servicer Decisions will not include (i) grants of easements or rights of way that do not materially affect the use or value of the Mortgaged Property or the borrower’s ability to make any payments with respect to the Mortgage Loan; (ii) the release, substitution or addition of collateral securing any Serviced Mortgage Loan or Serviced Loan Combination in connection with a defeasance of such collateral; or (iii) requests that are related to any condemnation action that is pending, or threatened in writing, and would affect a non-material portion of the Mortgaged Property; provided that such release or substitution or addition of collateral is not a Major Decision;

(i)        any modification, consent to a modification or waiver of any material term of any intercreditor or similar agreement related to a Serviced Mortgage Loan or Serviced Loan Combination, or any action to enforce rights with respect thereto; and

(j)        the exercise of all lender approval rights under any oil and gas lease with respect to the portfolio of Mortgaged Properties securing the Mortgage Loan identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Easy Stop Storage Portfolio;

provided, however, that notwithstanding the foregoing, the Master Servicer and Special Servicer may mutually agree as provided in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement that the Master Servicer will process any of the foregoing matters (as well as any Major Decision) with respect to any Serviced Loan that is not a Specially Serviced Loan. The Master Servicer and the Special Servicer will each be entitled to 50% of any Excess Modification Fees, Consent Fees, Ancillary Fees (other than fees for insufficient or returned checks), extension fees and Assumption Fees paid in connection with a Special Servicer Decision or Major Decision with respect to any Serviced Loan that is not a Specially Serviced Loan regardless of whether the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer processes such Special Servicer Decision or Major Decision.

In connection with (i) the release of a Mortgaged Property or any portion of a Mortgaged Property from the lien of the related Mortgage, or (ii) the taking of a Mortgaged Property or any portion of a Mortgaged Property by exercise of the power of eminent domain or condemnation, if the related Serviced Mortgage Loan documents require the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, to calculate (or require the related borrower to provide such calculation to the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable) the loan-to-value ratio of the remaining Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties or the fair market value of the real property constituting the remaining Mortgaged Property or Mortgaged Properties, for purposes of REMIC qualification of the related Serviced Mortgage Loan, then, unless then permitted by the REMIC provisions of the Code, such calculation shall exclude the value of personal property and going concern value, if any. In order to meet the foregoing requirements, in the case of a release of real property collateral securing a Mortgage Loan, the Master Servicer or Special Servicer, as applicable, will be required to observe the REMIC requirements of the Code with respect to a required payment of principal if the related loan-to-value ratio immediately after the release exceeds 125% with respect to the related property.

With respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans, the Master Servicer, prior to taking any action with respect to any Major Decision (or making a determination not to take action with respect to a Major Decision), and prior to taking any action with respect to any Special Servicer Decision, will be required to refer the request to the Special Servicer, who will process the request directly, or if mutually agreed to by the Special Servicer and the Master Servicer, the Master Servicer will be required to process such request, and if the Master Servicer processes such request, the Master Servicer will be required to prepare and submit its written analysis and recommendation to the Special Servicer with all information reasonably available to the Master Servicer that the Special Servicer may reasonably request in order to withhold or grant its consent, and in all cases the Special Servicer will be entitled (subject to the discussion under “—Directing Holder” below and “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan

S-318

Combinations” in this prospectus supplement) to approve or disapprove any modification, waiver or amendment that constitutes a Major Decision or a Special Servicer Decision.

No modification, waiver or amendment of any Co-Lender Agreement related to a Serviced Loan or an action to enforce rights with respect thereto, in each case, in a manner that materially and adversely affects the rights, duties and obligations of the Special Servicer will be permitted without the prior written consent of the Special Servicer.

The consent of the Special Servicer is required to any modification, waiver or amendment with regard to any Serviced Loan that is not a Specially Serviced Loan (other than certain non-material modifications, waivers or amendments), and the Special Servicer will also be required to obtain the consent of the related Directing Holder to the extent described below under “—Directing Holder” in this prospectus supplement. The Special Servicer is also required to obtain the consent of the related Directing Holder in connection with any modification, waiver or amendment with regard to any Specially Serviced Loan to the extent described below under “—Directing Holder” in this prospectus supplement.

When the Special Servicer’s consent is required under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement with respect to any modification, waiver or amendment of a non-Specially Serviced Loan that the Master Servicer is processing, such consent will be deemed given if the Special Servicer does not respond to a request for consent within the time periods set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. With respect to all applicable Specially Serviced Loan(s) and non-Specially Serviced Loan(s), the Special Servicer will be required to obtain, prior to consenting to such a proposed action of the Master Servicer that constitutes a Major Decision, and prior to itself taking any such action that constitutes a Major Decision, the written consent of the related Controlling Note Holder (to the extent set forth in the related Co-Lender Agreement if a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination is involved) or the Controlling Class Representative (if any other Serviced Loan(s) are involved and a Control Termination Event does not exist), as applicable, which consent will be deemed given if such related Directing Holder does not respond to a request for consent within the time periods set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

In no event, however, will the Special Servicer be permitted to (i) extend the maturity date of a Serviced Loan beyond a date that is three years prior to the Rated Final Distribution Date, or (ii) if the Serviced Loan is secured by a ground lease, extend the maturity date of such Serviced Loan beyond a date which is 20 years or, to the extent consistent with the Servicing Standard, giving due consideration to the remaining term of the ground lease, ten years, prior to the end of the current term of the ground lease, plus any options to extend exercisable unilaterally by the borrower.

Any modification, waiver or amendment with respect to a Serviced Loan Combination may be subject to the consent and/or consultation rights of the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” in this prospectus supplement.

The Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, is required to notify the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Depositor, any related Serviced Companion Loan Holder, any related Outside Controlling Note Holder, the Controlling Class Representative (prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event), the Operating Advisor (after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event) and the 17g-5 information provider, in writing, of any modification, waiver or amendment of any term of any Serviced Loan and the date of the modification and deliver a copy to the Trustee, any related Serviced Companion Loan Holder, any related Outside Controlling Note Holder, the Controlling Class Representative (prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event) and the Operating Advisor (after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event), and the original to the Trustee or other custodian under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Custodian”) of the recorded agreement relating to such modification, waiver or amendment within 15 business days following the execution and recordation of the modification, waiver or amendment.

Any Modification Fees paid by any borrower to the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer with respect to a modification, consent, extension, waiver or amendment of any term of a Serviced Loan (in the case of a Serviced Loan Combination, if applicable, subject to any related Co-Lender Agreement) will be applied as described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Application of Penalty Charges and Modification Fees” in this prospectus supplement.

S-319

The Master Servicer and the Special Servicer, as applicable, will be required, no less often than on a monthly basis, to make a knowledgeable servicing officer available via telephone to verbally answer questions from any related Serviced Companion Loan Holder, the Operating Advisor (after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event) and the Controlling Class Representative (prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event) regarding the performance and servicing of the applicable Serviced Mortgage Loans and/or REO Properties for which such Master Servicer or Special Servicer, as applicable, is responsible.

With respect to an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, any modifications, waivers and amendments will be effected by the Outside Special Servicer or the Outside Servicer, as applicable, in accordance with the terms of the Outside Servicing Agreement and the related Co-Lender Agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” and “—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement. Any consent rights entitled to be exercised by the holder of such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan with respect to modifications, waivers and amendments or certain other major decisions under the Outside Servicing Agreement, will be exercised by the Master Servicer or Special Servicer, depending on whether that Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan is then being specially serviced and depending on whether the matter would be a Major Decision, with, in the case of a matter that would be a Major Decision, the consent of the Controlling Class Representative unless a Control Termination Event exists or such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan is an Excluded Mortgage Loan. Any consultation rights entitled to be exercised by the holder of such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan will be exercised by the Controlling Class Representative (unless a Consultation Termination Event exists or such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan is an Excluded Mortgage Loan).

Directing Holder

General

The related Outside Controlling Note Holder (if a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination is involved) or the Controlling Class Representative (if any other Serviced Loan(s) are involved and a Control Termination Event does not exist), as applicable, will be entitled to advise (1) the Special Servicer, with respect to the applicable Serviced Loan(s) that are Specially Serviced Loan(s) and (2) the Special Servicer, with respect to the applicable Serviced Loan(s) that are not Specially Serviced Loan(s), as to all matters for which the Master Servicer must obtain the consent or deemed consent of the Special Servicer, in each case as described below.

The Controlling Class Representative will not be permitted to exercise any of its rights in such capacity with respect to an Excluded Mortgage Loan.

Except as otherwise described in the succeeding paragraphs below, (a) the Master Servicer will not be permitted to take any of the following actions unless it has obtained the consent of the Special Servicer and (b) for so long as no Control Termination Event exists, the Special Servicer will not be permitted to consent to the Master Servicer’s taking any of the following actions, nor will the Special Servicer itself be permitted to take any of the following actions, as to which the related Directing Holder has objected in writing within 10 business days (or in the case of a determination of an Acceptable Insurance Default, 20 days) after receipt of the written recommendation and analysis from the Special Servicer (provided that (i) if such written objection has not been received by the Special Servicer within the 10-business day or, if applicable, 20-day period, the related Directing Holder will be deemed to have approved such action and (ii) the consent of the Controlling Class Representative will not be required in connection with a Major Decision with respect to an Excluded Mortgage Loan) (each of the following, a “Major Decision”):

(A)        any proposed or actual foreclosure upon or comparable conversion (which may include acquisitions of an REO Property) of the ownership of properties securing such of the Serviced Loans as come into and continue in default;

(B)        any modification, consent to a modification or waiver of any monetary term (other than Penalty Charges which the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, is permitted to waive pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement) or material non-monetary term (including, without limitation, a modification with respect to the timing of payments and acceptance of discounted payoffs but excluding waiver of Penalty Charges) of a Serviced Loan or any extension of the maturity date or Anticipated Repayment Date, as applicable, of such Serviced Loan;

S-320

(C)        any sale of a Serviced Mortgage Loan that is a Defaulted Mortgage Loan (and any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan) or an REO Property (other than in connection with the termination of the Issuing Entity as described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Optional Termination; Optional Mortgage Loan Purchase”) for less than the applicable Repurchase Price;

(D)        any determination to bring an REO Property into compliance with applicable environmental laws or to otherwise address hazardous material located at an REO Property;

(E)        any release of collateral or any acceptance of substitute or additional collateral for a Serviced Loan or any consent to either of the foregoing, other than immaterial condemnation actions and other similar takings, or if otherwise required pursuant to the specific terms of the related Serviced Loan and for which there is no lender discretion;

(F)        any waiver of a “due-on-sale” or “due-on-encumbrance” clause with respect to a Mortgage Loan or, if lender consent is required, any consent to such a waiver or consent to a transfer of the Mortgaged Property or interests in the borrower or consent to the incurrence of additional debt, other than any such transfer or incurrence of debt as may be effected without the consent of the lender under the related loan agreement or related to an immaterial easement, right of way or similar agreement;

(G)        any approval of property management company changes or franchise changes, in each case to the extent the lender is required to consent or approve under the related Serviced Loan documents;

(H)        releases of any escrow accounts, reserve accounts or letters of credit held as performance or “earn-out” escrows or reserves, other than those required pursuant to the specific terms of the related Serviced Loan and for which there is no lender discretion;

(I)        any acceptance of an assumption agreement or any other agreement permitting transfers of interests in a borrower or guarantor releasing a borrower or guarantor from liability under a Serviced Loan other than pursuant to the specific terms of such Serviced Loan and for which there is no lender discretion;

(J)        the determination of the Special Servicer pursuant to clause (b) or clause (g) of the definition of “Servicing Transfer Event”;

(K)        following a default or an event of default with respect to a Serviced Loan, any acceleration of a Serviced Loan, or initiation of judicial, bankruptcy or similar proceedings under the related Serviced Loan documents or with respect to the related borrower or Mortgaged Property;

(L)        any modification, waiver or amendment of an intercreditor agreement, Co-Lender Agreement or similar agreement with any mezzanine lender or subordinate debt holder related to a Serviced Loan, or an action to enforce rights with respect thereto;

(M)        any determination of an Acceptable Insurance Default;

(N)        any proposed modification or waiver of any material provision in the related Mortgage Loan documents governing the type, nature or amount of insurance coverage required to be obtained and maintained by the related borrower; and

(O)        any approval of any casualty insurance settlements or condemnation settlements, and any determination to apply casualty proceeds or condemnation awards to the reduction of the debt rather than to the restoration of the Mortgaged Property;

provided, however, that in the event that the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer determines that immediate action is necessary to protect the interests of the Certificateholders (and, with respect to any Serviced Loan Combination, the Serviced Companion Loan Holder(s)) (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders and, if applicable, the Serviced Companion Loan Holder(s) constituted a single lender (and, with respect to a Serviced

S-321

AB Loan Combination, taking into account the subordinate nature of the related Subordinate Companion Loan)), the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as the case may be, may take any such action without waiting for the Directing Holder’s (or, if applicable, the Special Servicer’s) response. For the avoidance of doubt, any modification, waiver, consent or amendment by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer that is set forth above as a Major Decision will constitute a Major Decision regardless of the fact that such action is being taken in connection with a defeasance.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Controlling Class Representative is the related Directing Holder, the Special Servicer is not required to obtain the consent of the Controlling Class Representative for any Major Decision following the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event; provided, however, that after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Special Servicer will be required to consult with the Controlling Class Representative (until the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event) and the Operating Advisor in connection with any Major Decision and to consider alternative actions recommended by the Controlling Class Representative and the Operating Advisor, but only to the extent that consultation with, or consent of, the Controlling Class Representative would have been required prior to the occurrence and continuance of such Control Termination Event; provided that such consultation is not binding on the Special Servicer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Controlling Class Representative shall have no consent or consultation rights with respect to Major Decisions with respect to any Excluded Mortgage Loan under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

In addition, each of (x) the Controlling Class Representative (with respect to each Serviced Loan other than (i) a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination and (ii) an Excluded Mortgage Loan, and provided that a Control Termination Event does not exist) and (y) the related Outside Controlling Note Holder (with respect to a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination) may direct the Special Servicer to take, or to refrain from taking, such other actions with respect to any Serviced Loan, as such party may reasonably deem advisable. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Master Servicer nor the Special Servicer will be required to take or refrain from taking any action pursuant to instructions or objections from any such party that would cause it to violate applicable law, the related Serviced Loan documents, any related Co-Lender Agreement or intercreditor agreement, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, including the Servicing Standard, or the REMIC provisions of the Code.

The “Directing Holder” will be: (a) with respect to all of the Serviced Loans other than a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination and any Excluded Mortgage Loan, the Controlling Class Representative; and (b) with respect to any Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination, the related Outside Controlling Note Holder.

The “Controlling Class Representative” is the Controlling Class Certificateholder (or other representative) selected by the Controlling Class Certificateholders representing more than 50% of the Certificate Principal Amount of the Controlling Class, as identified by notice to the Certificate Registrar by the applicable Controlling Class Certificateholders from time to time, with notice of such selection delivered to the Special Servicer, the Master Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator; provided, however, that (i) absent that selection, or (ii) until a Controlling Class Representative is so selected or (iii) upon receipt of a notice from the Controlling Class Certificateholders that own Certificates representing more than 50% of the Certificate Principal Amount of the Controlling Class, that a Controlling Class Representative is no longer designated, the Controlling Class Representative will be the Controlling Class Certificateholder that owns the largest aggregate Certificate Principal Amount of the Controlling Class, as identified to the Certificate Registrar pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The initial Controlling Class Representative is expected to be LNR Securities Holdings, LLC or an affiliate thereof. No person may exercise any of the rights and powers of the Controlling Class Representative with respect to an Excluded Mortgage Loan.

Once a Controlling Class Representative has been selected, each of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Depositor, the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee and each other Certificateholder (or beneficial owner of Certificates, if applicable) will be entitled to rely on such selection unless a majority of the Certificateholders of the Controlling Class, by Certificate Principal Amount, or such Controlling Class Representative has notified the Certificate Administrator, the Master Servicer and each other Certificateholder of the Controlling Class, in writing, of the resignation of such Controlling Class Representative or the selection of a new Controlling Class Representative. Upon receipt of written notice of, or other knowledge of, the resignation of a Controlling Class Representative, the Certificate Administrator will be required to request the Certificateholders of the Controlling Class to select a new Controlling Class Representative. Upon receipt of

S-322

notice of a change in Controlling Class Representative, the Certificate Administrator will be required to promptly forward notice thereof to each other party to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

A “Controlling Class Certificateholder” is each holder (or beneficial owner, if applicable) of a Certificate of the Controlling Class as determined by the Certificate Administrator from time to time.

The “Controlling Class” will be as of any time of determination the most subordinate class of Control Eligible Certificates then outstanding that has an aggregate Certificate Principal Amount, as notionally reduced by any Appraisal Reduction Amounts allocable to such Class, at least equal to 25% of the initial Certificate Principal Amount of that Class or, if no Class of Control Eligible Certificates meets the preceding requirement, the Class E Certificates; provided, however, that (at any time that the aggregate Certificate Principal Amount of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class D Certificates and the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Trust Components has been reduced to zero without regard to the allocation of Appraisal Reduction Amounts) (a) in the case of any Class of Control Eligible Certificates to which the designation of “Controlling Class” would otherwise shift by operation of this definition, where the Certificate Principal Amount of such Class of Control Eligible Certificates has been reduced to zero (without regard to the allocation of Appraisal Reduction Amounts) prior to such shift, then designation of “Controlling Class” shall not shift and shall remain with the Class of Control Eligible Certificates currently designated as the Controlling Class, and (b) in the case of any Class of Control Eligible Certificates which is then designated the “Controlling Class”, if the Certificate Principal Amount of such Class of Control Eligible Certificates is reduced to zero (without regard to the allocation of Appraisal Reduction Amounts), then the designation of “Controlling Class” shall shift to the Class of Control Eligible Certificates that is the most subordinate and that also has a remaining Certificate Principal Amount. The Controlling Class as of the Closing Date will be the Class H Certificates.

The “Control Eligible Certificates” will be any of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H Certificates.

A “Control Termination Event” will occur when none of the Classes of Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H Certificates has an outstanding Certificate Principal Amount (as notionally reduced by any Appraisal Reduction Amounts then allocable to such Class) that is at least equal to 25% of the initial Certificate Principal Amount of that Class of Certificates; provided, however, that a Control Termination Event will in no event exist at any time that the aggregate Certificate Principal Amount of each Class of Certificates (other than the Control Eligible Certificates) (without regard to the allocation of Appraisal Reduction Amounts) has been reduced to zero. With respect to Excluded Mortgage Loans, a Control Termination Event will be deemed to exist.

A “Consultation Termination Event” will occur when none of the Classes of Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H Certificates has an outstanding Certificate Principal Amount, without regard to the allocation of any Appraisal Reduction Amounts, that is equal to or greater than 25% of the initial Certificate Principal Amount of that Class of Certificates; provided, however, that a Consultation Termination Event will in no event exist at any time that the aggregate Certificate Principal Amount of each Class of Certificates (other than the Control Eligible Certificates) (without regard to the allocation of Appraisal Reduction Amounts) has been reduced to zero. With respect to Excluded Mortgage Loans, a Consultation Termination Event will be deemed to exist.

An “Excluded Mortgage Loan” is a Mortgage Loan or Loan Combination with respect to which the Controlling Class Representative or the holder(s) of more than 50% of the Controlling Class (by Certificate Principal Amount) is (or are) a Borrower Party.

An “Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loan” is a Mortgage Loan with respect to which the Controlling Class Representative or any Controlling Class Certificateholder, as applicable, is a Borrower Party.

A “Borrower Party” means either (i) a borrower, a mortgagor or a manager of a Mortgaged Property or any affiliate of any of the foregoing, or (ii) a lender under a mezzanine loan (secured by a pledge of the direct (or indirect) equity interests in a borrower under a mortgage loan or loan combination) that has accelerated such mezzanine loan or commenced foreclosure proceedings against the equity collateral pledged to secure that mezzanine loan or any affiliate of such accelerating or foreclosing mezzanine lender. Solely for the purposes of the definition of “Borrower Party”, the term “affiliate” means, with respect to any specified person, (i) any other person controlling or controlled by or under common control with such specified person or (ii) any other person that owns, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the ownership interests in such specified person.

S-323

After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the consent rights of the Controlling Class Representative will terminate, and the Controlling Class Representative will retain consultation rights under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement with respect to certain Major Decisions and other matters with respect to the applicable Serviced Loan(s); provided, however, that the Controlling Class Representative will not be permitted to consult with respect to any Serviced AB Loan Combination while any related Serviced Subordinate Companion Loan Holder is the related Outside Controlling Note Holder.

In addition, unless a Consultation Termination Event exists, the Controlling Class Representative, except with respect to any Loan Combination that includes an Excluded Mortgage Loan, will have non-binding consultation rights with respect to (i) certain Major Decisions and other matters relating to any Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination and (ii) certain servicing decisions and other matters relating to any Outside Serviced Loan Combination, in each case if and to the extent that the holder of the related Split Mortgage Loan is granted consultation rights under the related Co-Lender Agreement.

After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, the Controlling Class Representative will have no consultation or consent rights under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and will have no right to receive any notices, reports or information (other than notices, reports or information required to be delivered to all Certificateholders) or any other rights as a Directing Holder. However, the Controlling Class Certificateholder will maintain the right to exercise its Voting Rights for the same purposes as any other Certificateholder under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (other than with respect to Excluded Mortgage Loans).

If, with respect to any Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination, the related controlling note is included in a separate securitization trust, the pooling and servicing agreement, trust and servicing agreement or comparable agreement for the relevant securitization may impose limitations on the exercise of rights associated with that related controlling note. For example, any “controlling class representative” (or equivalent entity) for such other securitization may lose consent and consultation rights in a manner similar to that described in the prior three paragraphs with respect to the Controlling Class Representative.

Neither the Master Servicer nor the Special Servicer will be required to take or to refrain from taking any action pursuant to instructions from a Directing Holder, or due to any failure to approve an action by any such party, or due to an objection by any such party that would cause either the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer to violate applicable law, the related Mortgage Loan documents, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (including the Servicing Standard), any related Co-Lender Agreement or intercreditor agreement or the REMIC provisions of the Code.

The Controlling Class Representative or an Outside Controlling Note Holder, as applicable, has certain rights to remove and replace the Special Servicer with respect to the related Serviced Loan(s) as described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Termination of the Special Servicer” in this prospectus supplement.

Each Certificateholder and beneficial owner of a Control Eligible Certificate is hereby deemed to have agreed by virtue of its purchase of such Certificate (or beneficial ownership interest in such Certificate) to provide its name and address to the Certificate Administrator and to notify the Certificate Administrator of the transfer of any Control Eligible Certificate (or the beneficial ownership of any Control Eligible Certificate), the selection of the Controlling Class Representative or the resignation or removal of the Controlling Class Representative. Any such Certificateholder (or beneficial owner) or its designee at any time appointed Controlling Class Representative is hereby deemed to have agreed by virtue of its purchase of a Control Eligible Certificate (or the beneficial ownership interest in a Control Eligible Certificate) to notify the Certificate Administrator when such Certificateholder (or beneficial owner) or designee is appointed Controlling Class Representative and when it is removed or resigns. Upon receipt of such notice, the Certificate Administrator will be required to notify the Special Servicer, the Master Servicer, the Operating Advisor and the Trustee of the identity of the Controlling Class Representative, any resignation or removal of the Controlling Class Representative and/or any new holder or beneficial owner of a Control Eligible Certificate. In addition, upon the request of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor or the Trustee, as applicable, the Certificate Administrator will be required to provide the identity of the then-current Controlling Class and a list of the Certificateholders (or beneficial owners, if applicable, at the expense of the Issuing Entity if such expense arises in connection with an event as to which the Controlling Class Representative or the Controlling Class has consent or consultation rights pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or in connection with a request made by the Operating Advisor in connection with its obligation under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to deliver a copy of the Operating

S-324

Advisor’s annual report to the Controlling Class Representative, and otherwise at the expense of the requesting party) of the Controlling Class to such requesting party, and each of the Master Servicer, Special Servicer, Operating Advisor and the Trustee shall be entitled to rely on such the information so provided by the Certificate Administrator.

In the event of a change in the Controlling Class, the Certificate Administrator will be required to promptly contact the current holder(s) of the Controlling Class (or any designee(s) thereof) or one of its affiliates, or, if applicable, any successor Controlling Class Representative or Controlling Class Certificateholder(s), and determine whether any such entity is the holder (or beneficial owner) of at least a majority of the Controlling Class (in effect after such change in Controlling Class) by Certificate Principal Amount. If at any time an initial Controlling Class Certificateholder, or any successor Controlling Class Representative or Controlling Class Certificateholder(s) is no longer the holder (or beneficial owner) of at least a majority of the Controlling Class by Certificate Principal Amount and the Certificate Administrator has neither (i) received notice of the then-current Controlling Class Certificateholders (or beneficial owners) of at least a majority of the Controlling Class by Certificate Principal Amount nor (ii) received notice of a replacement Controlling Class Representative pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, then (1) the largest Controlling Class Certificateholder (by Certificate Principal Amount) that holds in excess of 15% (by Certificate Principal Amount) of the Controlling Class that sends notice of the selection of a Controlling Class Representative will be entitled to so appoint a Controlling Class Representative or, (2) if no such holder sends notice pursuant to clause (1) and LNR Securities Holdings, LLC or an affiliate thereof owns at least 15% of the Controlling Class of Certificates, then such entity will be the Controlling Class Representative and (3) if neither of the events in clause (1) or (2) occurs, then a Control Termination Event will be deemed to have occurred and will be deemed to continue until such time as the Certificate Administrator receives any such notice referred to above.

With respect to an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, any consent or approvals on actions to be taken by the Outside Special Servicer or the Outside Servicer are governed by the terms of the Outside Servicing Agreement and the related Co-Lender Agreement, as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” and “—Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans” in this prospectus supplement.

Limitation on Liability of the Directing Holder

The Directing Holder will not be liable to the Issuing Entity or the Certificateholders for any action taken, or for refraining from the taking of any action or for errors in judgment. However, the Controlling Class Representative will not be protected against any liability to the Controlling Class Certificateholders that would otherwise be imposed by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of duties or by reason of negligent disregard of obligations or duties.

Each Certificateholder acknowledges and agrees, by its acceptance of its Certificates, that a Directing Holder:

(a)        may have special relationships and interests that conflict with those of holders of one or more Classes of Certificates;

(b)        may act solely in its own interests (or, in the case of the Controlling Class Representative, in the interests of the holders of the Controlling Class);

(c)        does not have any liability or duties to the holders of any Class of Certificates (other than, in the case of the Controlling Class Representative, the Controlling Class);

(d)        may take actions that favor its own interests (or, in the case of the Controlling Class Representative, the interests of the holders of the Controlling Class) over the interests of the holders of one or more Classes of Certificates; and

(e)        will have no liability whatsoever (other than, in the case of the Controlling Class Representative, to a Controlling Class Certificateholder) for having so acted as set forth in (a) – (d) above, and that no Certificateholder may take any action whatsoever against any Directing Holder or any affiliate, director, officer, employee, shareholder, member, partner, agent or principal of any Directing Holder for having so acted.

S-325

Under circumstances where it is authorized or required to do so by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the taking, or refraining from taking, of any action by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer in accordance with the direction of or approval of a Directing Holder, which does not violate any law or the Servicing Standard or the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, or any related Co-Lender Agreement or intercreditor agreement, will not result in any liability on the part of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer.

Operating Advisor

General Obligations

After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, subject to the restrictions and limitations described in this prospectus supplement, the Operating Advisor will generally review the Special Servicer’s operational practices in respect of the applicable Specially Serviced Loan(s) to formulate an opinion as to whether or not those operational practices generally satisfy the Servicing Standard with respect to the resolution and/or liquidation of such Specially Serviced Loans, each in accordance with the Operating Advisor Standard. In addition, after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Operating Advisor will consult with the Special Servicer in accordance with the Operating Advisor Standard with regard to certain matters with respect to the servicing of the applicable Specially Serviced Loan(s) to the extent described in this prospectus supplement and set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Operating Advisor will act solely as a contracting party to the extent described in this prospectus supplement and under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, will have no fiduciary duty, will have no other duty except with respect to its specific obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and will have no duty or liability to any particular Class of Certificates or any Certificateholder. The Operating Advisor is not a servicer and will not be charged with changing the outcome on any particular Specially Serviced Loan. By purchasing a Certificate, potential investors acknowledge and agree that there could be multiple strategies to resolve any Specially Serviced Loan and the goal of the Operating Advisor’s participation is to provide additional monitoring relating to the Special Servicer’s compliance with the Servicing Standard in making its determinations as to which strategy to execute. After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Operating Advisor’s review of information (other than a Final Asset Status Report and information accompanying such report) or interaction with the Special Servicer related to any specific applicable Specially Serviced Loan is only to provide background information to the Operating Advisor and to allow more meaningful interaction with the Special Servicer. Potential investors should note that the Operating Advisor is not an “advisor” for any purpose other than as specifically set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and is not an advisor to any person, including without limitation any Certificateholder. See “Risk Factors—Your Lack of Control Over the Issuing Entity and Servicing of the Mortgage Loans Can Create Risks” in this prospectus supplement.

Following the occurrence and during the continuation of a Control Termination Event, the Operating Advisor will have certain consultation rights with respect to Major Decisions with respect to the applicable Serviced Loan(s) as described under “—Directing Holder” above and “—Asset Status Reports” below.

Prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Operating Advisor is required to promptly review (i) all information available to Privileged Persons on the Certificate Administrator’s website with respect to the Special Servicer, assets on the CREFC® servicer watch list and the applicable Specially Serviced Loan(s) and (ii) each related Final Asset Status Report. Prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Operating Advisor’s obligations will be limited to the review described in the immediately preceding sentence and generally will not involve an assessment of specific actions of the Special Servicer and, in any event, will be subject to limitations described in this prospectus supplement or set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

Prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Operating Advisor will have no specific involvement with respect to collateral substitutions, assignments, workouts, modifications, consents, waivers, insurance policies, borrower substitutions, lease modifications and amendments and other similar actions that the Special Servicer may perform with respect to such Serviced Mortgage Loan under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

Prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Special Servicer will deliver to the Operating Advisor each related Final Asset Status Report. Subject to the Privileged Information Exception, the Operating Advisor will be obligated to keep confidential any Privileged Information received from the Special Servicer, the related Directing Holder or any related Serviced Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) in

S-326

connection with the related Directing Holder’s or such related Serviced Companion Loan Holder’s exercise of any rights under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (including, without limitation, in connection with any asset status report) or otherwise in connection with the Mortgage Loans.

The Operating Advisor is required to keep all Privileged Information confidential and may not disclose such Privileged Information to any person (including Certificateholders other than the Controlling Class Representative), other than (1) to the extent expressly required by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, to the other parties to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement with a notice indicating that such information is Privileged Information or (2) pursuant to a Privileged Information Exception. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Operating Advisor will be permitted to share Privileged Information with its affiliates and any subcontractors of the Operating Advisor that agree in writing to be bound by the same confidentiality provisions applicable to the Operating Advisor. Each party to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement that receives Privileged Information from the Operating Advisor with a notice stating that such information is Privileged Information may not disclose such Privileged Information to any person without the prior written consent of the Special Servicer, any related Outside Controlling Note Holder (if a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination is involved) and, unless a Consultation Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the Controlling Class Representative other than pursuant to a Privileged Information Exception.

In addition, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Special Servicer will forward any Appraisal Reduction Amount with respect to, and net present value calculations used in the Special Servicer’s determination of the course of action to be taken in connection with the workout or liquidation of, a Specially Serviced Loan to the Operating Advisor after they have been finalized. The Operating Advisor will review such calculations but may not opine on, or otherwise call into question, such Appraisal Reduction Amount calculations and/or net present value calculations; provided, however, if the Operating Advisor discovers a mathematical error contained in such calculations, then the Operating Advisor will be required to notify the Special Servicer and the related Directing Holder of such error.

The “Operating Advisor Standard” means the Operating Advisor is required to act solely on behalf of the Issuing Entity and in the best interest of, and for the benefit of, the Certificateholders (as a collective whole as if such Certificateholders (and, with respect to any Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination, any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder(s)) constituted a single lender), and not any particular Class of those Certificateholders (as determined by the Operating Advisor in the exercise of its good faith and reasonable judgment).

“Privileged Information” means (i) any correspondence or other communications between the related Directing Holder (and, in the case of any Serviced Loan Combinations, the Serviced Companion Loan Holder or its representative) and the Special Servicer related to any Specially Serviced Loan or the exercise of the consent or consultation rights of such Directing Holder under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or any related Serviced Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) under the related Co-Lender Agreement, (ii) any strategically sensitive information that the Special Servicer has reasonably determined could compromise the Issuing Entity’s position in any ongoing or future negotiations with the related borrower or other interested party, and (iii) any information subject to attorney-client privilege.

“Privileged Information Exception” means, with respect to any Privileged Information, at any time (a) such Privileged Information becomes generally available and known to the public other than as a result of a disclosure directly or indirectly by the party restricted from disclosing such Privileged Information (the “Restricted Party”), (b) it is reasonable and necessary for the Restricted Party to disclose such Privileged Information in working with legal counsel, auditors, taxing authorities or other governmental agencies, (c) such Privileged Information was already known to such Restricted Party and not otherwise subject to a confidentiality obligation and/or (d) the Restricted Party is (in the case of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator, any affected Serviced Companion Loan Holder and the Trustee, as evidenced by an opinion of counsel (which will be an additional expense of the Issuing Entity) delivered to each of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the applicable Directing Holder, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator and the Trustee), required by law, rule, regulation, order, judgment or decree to disclose such information.

A “Final Asset Status Report” with respect to any Specially Serviced Loan, means each related asset status report, together with such other data or supporting information provided by the Special Servicer to the Operating Advisor or the related Directing Holder or any related Serviced Companion Loan Holder (or its representative), in each case, which does not include any communications (other than the related asset status report) between the

S-327

Special Servicer and the related Directing Holder and/or related Serviced Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) with respect to such Specially Serviced Loan; provided that no asset status report will be considered to be a Final Asset Status Report unless any related Outside Controlling Note Holder (if a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination is involved) or, prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Controlling Class Representative (if any other Serviced Loan(s) (other than any Excluded Mortgage Loan) are involved), as applicable, has either finally approved of and consented to the actions proposed to be taken in connection therewith, or has exhausted all of its rights of approval or consent or has been deemed to have approved or consented to such action or the asset status report is otherwise implemented by the Special Servicer in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Special Servicer will forward any Appraisal Reduction Amount and net present value calculations with respect to a Specially Serviced Loan to the Operating Advisor and the Operating Advisor is required to promptly recalculate and verify the accuracy of the mathematical calculations and the corresponding application of the non-discretionary portion of the applicable formulas required to be utilized in connection with any such Appraisal Reduction Amount or net present value calculations used in the Special Servicer’s determination of the course of action to be taken in connection with the workout or liquidation of such Specially Serviced Loan prior to utilization by the Special Servicer. The Special Servicer will be required to deliver the foregoing calculations together with information and support materials (including such additional information reasonably requested by the Operating Advisor to confirm the mathematical accuracy of such calculations, but not including any Privileged Information) to the Operating Advisor. The Operating Advisor will recalculate and verify the accuracy of those calculations and, in the event the Operating Advisor does not agree with the mathematical calculations or the application of the applicable non-discretionary portions of the formula required to be utilized for such calculation, the Operating Advisor and Special Servicer will consult with each other in order to resolve any inaccuracy in the mathematical calculations or the application of the non-discretionary portions of the related formula in arriving at those mathematical calculations or any disagreement. In the event the Operating Advisor and Special Servicer are not able to resolve such matters, the Operating Advisor will promptly notify the Certificate Administrator and the Certificate Administrator will determine any necessary action to take in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

The ability to perform the duties of the Operating Advisor and the quality and the depth of any annual report will be dependent upon the timely receipt of information required to be delivered to the Operating Advisor and the accuracy and the completeness of such information. In addition, in no event will the Operating Advisor have the power to compel any transaction party to take or refrain from taking any action. It is possible that the lack of access to Privileged Information may limit or prohibit the Operating Advisor from performing its duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and, in either case, the Operating Advisor will describe any such limitations in the applicable annual report and will not be subject to liability arising from its lack of access to Privileged Information.

Annual Report

Following the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, based on the Operating Advisor’s review of any annual compliance statement, Assessment of Compliance, Attestation Report, asset status report and other information (other than any communications between the related Directing Holder or any related Serviced Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) and the Special Servicer that would be Privileged Information) delivered to the Operating Advisor by the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor will (if any applicable Serviced Mortgage Loan(s) were Specially Serviced Loan(s) during the prior calendar year) prepare an annual report to be provided to the Depositor, the Rule 17g-5 information provider (which is required to promptly post such annual report on the Rule 17g-5 website), the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator (and made available through the Certificate Administrator’s website) setting forth its assessment of the Special Servicer’s performance of its duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement on a platform-level basis with respect to the resolution and liquidation of such Specially Serviced Loan(s) and with respect to each asset status report delivered to the Operating Advisor by the Special Servicer during the prior calendar year. No annual report will be required from the Operating Advisor with respect to the Special Servicer if during the prior calendar year no asset status report was prepared by the Special Servicer in connection with a Specially Serviced Loan or REO Property. Only as used in connection with the Operating Advisor’s annual report, the term “platform-level basis” refers to the Special Servicer’s performance of its duties as they relate to the resolution and liquidation of Specially Serviced Loans, taking into account the Special Servicer’s specific duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement as well as the extent to which those duties were performed in accordance with the Servicing Standard, with reasonable consideration by the Operating Advisor of any annual compliance statement, Assessment of

S-328

Compliance, Attestation Report, asset status report and other information (other than any communications between the related Directing Holder or a Serviced Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) and the Special Servicer that would be Privileged Information) delivered to the Operating Advisor by the Special Servicer pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

The Operating Advisor will be required to deliver any annual report produced by the Operating Advisor (at least 10 calendar days prior to its delivery to the Depositor, the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator) to (a) the Special Servicer, (b) the Controlling Class Representative (if a Serviced Loan other than a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination is addressed and a Consultation Termination Event does not exist); and (c) the related Outside Controlling Note Holder (if a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination is addressed). The Operating Advisor may, but will not be obligated to, revise the annual report based on any comments received from the Special Servicer or the Controlling Class Representative.

Following the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, in each annual report, the Operating Advisor, based on its review conducted in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, will identify any material deviations (i) from the Servicing Standard and (ii) from the Special Servicer’s obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement with respect to the resolution and liquidation of the applicable Specially Serviced Loan(s) based on the limited review required in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. Each annual report will be required to comply with the confidentiality requirements described in this prospectus supplement regarding Privileged Information and as otherwise set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

Replacement of the Special Servicer

At any time after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, if the Operating Advisor determines that the Special Servicer is not performing its duties as required under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or is otherwise not acting in accordance with the Servicing Standard, the Operating Advisor may recommend the replacement of the Special Servicer with respect to the Serviced Loan(s) in the manner described under “—Termination of the Special Servicer” above, subject to any related Outside Controlling Note Holder’s right to consent, as described under “—Termination of the Special Servicer” in this prospectus supplement.

Operating Advisor Termination Events

The following constitute Operating Advisor termination events under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (each, an “Operating Advisor Termination Event”) whether any such event is voluntary or involuntary or is effected by operation of law or pursuant to any judgment, decree or order of any court or any order, rule or regulation of any administrative or governmental body:

(a)        any failure by the Operating Advisor to observe or perform in any material respect any of its covenants or agreements or the material breach of its representations or warranties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which failure continues unremedied for a period of 30 days after the date on which written notice of such failure is given to the Operating Advisor by the Trustee or to the Operating Advisor and the Trustee by the holders of Certificates having greater than 25% of the aggregate Voting Rights of all then outstanding Certificates; provided, however, that with respect to any such failure which is not curable within such 30-day period, the Operating Advisor will have an additional cure period of 30 days to effect such cure so long as it has commenced to cure such failure within the initial 30-day period and has provided the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator with an officer’s certificate certifying that it has diligently pursued, and is continuing to pursue, such cure;

(b)        any failure by the Operating Advisor to perform in accordance with the Operating Advisor Standard which failure continues unremedied for a period of 30 days;

(c)        any failure by the Operating Advisor to be an Eligible Operating Advisor, which failure continues unremedied for a period of 30 days;

(d)        a decree or order of a court or agency or supervisory authority having jurisdiction in the premises in an involuntary case under any present or future federal or state bankruptcy, insolvency or similar law for the appointment of a conservator or receiver or liquidator in any insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshaling of assets and liabilities or similar proceedings, or for the winding-up or liquidation of its affairs, has been entered

S-329

against the Operating Advisor, and such decree or order has remained in force undischarged or unstayed for a period of 60 days;

(e)        the Operating Advisor consents to the appointment of a conservator or receiver or liquidator or liquidation committee in any insolvency, readjustment of debt, marshaling of assets and liabilities, voluntary liquidation, or similar proceedings of or relating to the Operating Advisor or of or relating to all or substantially all of its property; or

(f)        the Operating Advisor admits in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they become due, files a petition to take advantage of any applicable insolvency or reorganization statute, makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, or voluntarily suspends payment of its obligations.

Upon receipt by the Certificate Administrator of notice of the occurrence of any Operating Advisor Termination Event, the Certificate Administrator will be required to promptly provide written notice to all Certificateholders electronically by posting such notice on its internet website, unless the Certificate Administrator has received notice that such Operating Advisor Termination Event has been remedied.

Rights Upon Operating Advisor Termination Event

If an Operating Advisor Termination Event occurs, and in each and every such case, so long as such Operating Advisor Termination Event has not been remedied, then either the Trustee (i) may or (ii) upon the written direction of holders of Certificates evidencing at least 25% of the Voting Rights of each Class of Non-Reduced Certificates, will be required to, terminate all of the rights and obligations of the Operating Advisor under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, other than rights and obligations accrued prior to such termination and other than indemnification rights (arising out of events occurring prior to such termination), by written notice to the Operating Advisor.

As soon as practicable, but in no event later than 15 business days after (i) the Operating Advisor resigns (excluding circumstances where no successor operating advisor is required to be appointed) or (ii) the Trustee delivers such written notice of termination to the Operating Advisor, the Trustee will appoint a successor operating advisor that is an Eligible Operating Advisor, which successor operating advisor may be an affiliate of the Trustee. If the Trustee is the successor Master Servicer or the successor Special Servicer, neither the Trustee nor any of its affiliates will be the successor operating advisor. The Trustee will be required to provide written notice of the appointment of a successor operating advisor to the Special Servicer and the Operating Advisor within one business day of such appointment. Except as described below under “—Termination of the Operating Advisor Without Cause,” the appointment of a successor operating advisor will not be subject to the vote, consent or approval of the holder of any Class of Certificates. Upon any termination of the Operating Advisor and appointment of a successor to the Operating Advisor, the Trustee will be required to, as soon as possible, give written notice of the termination and appointment to the Special Servicer, the Master Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, the Certificateholders, the Depositor, any related Outside Controlling Note Holder and, if a Consultation Termination Event does not exist, the Controlling Class Representative. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Trustee is unable to find a successor Operating Advisor within 30 days of the termination of the Operating Advisor, the Depositor will be permitted to find a replacement. Unless and until a replacement Operating Advisor is appointed, no party will act as the Operating Advisor and the provisions in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement relating to consultation with respect to the Operating Advisor will not be applicable until a replacement Operating Advisor is appointed under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

“Eligible Operating Advisor” means an institution (i) that is the special servicer or operating advisor on a transaction rated by any of Moody’s, Fitch, Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Inc., Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, a Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC business, DBRS, Inc. and/or Morningstar, but has not been the special servicer or operating advisor on a transaction for which Moody’s, Fitch, Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Inc., Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, DBRS, Inc. and/or Morningstar has qualified, downgraded or withdrawn its rating or ratings of, one or more classes of certificates for such transaction citing servicing concerns with the special servicer or operating advisor, as applicable, as the sole or material factor in such rating action, (ii) that can and will make the representations and warranties set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (iii) that is not the Special Servicer or any Directing Holder or an affiliate of the Special Servicer or any Directing Holder and (iv) that has not been paid any fees, compensation or other remuneration by any Special Servicer or successor special servicer (x) in respect of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or (y) for the recommendation

S-330

of the replacement of the Special Servicer or the appointment of a successor special servicer to become the Special Servicer.

Termination of the Operating Advisor Without Cause

Upon (i) the written direction of holders of Non-Reduced Certificates evidencing not less than 15% of the Voting Rights of the Non-Reduced Certificates requesting a vote to terminate and replace the Operating Advisor with a proposed successor operating advisor that is an Eligible Operating Advisor, and (ii) payment by such holders to the Certificate Administrator of the reasonable fees and expenses to be incurred by the Certificate Administrator in connection with administering such vote, the Certificate Administrator will promptly provide written notice to all Certificateholders and the Operating Advisor of such request by posting such notice on its internet website, and by mailing to all Certificateholders and the Operating Advisor. Upon the written direction of holders of more than 50% of the Voting Rights of the Non-Reduced Certificates that exercise their right to vote (provided that holders of at least 50% of the Voting Rights of the Non-Reduced Certificates exercise their right to vote), the Trustee will terminate all of the rights and obligations of the Operating Advisor under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (other than any rights or obligations that accrued prior to the date of such termination and other than indemnification rights (arising out of events occurring prior to such termination)) by written notice to the Operating Advisor, and the proposed successor operating advisor will be appointed. The Certificate Administrator will include on each Distribution Date statement a statement that each Certificateholder and beneficial owner of Certificates may access such notices on the Certificate Administrator’s website and each Certificateholder and beneficial owner of Certificates may register to receive email notifications when such notices are posted on the website. The Certificate Administrator will be entitled to reimbursement from the requesting Certificateholders for the reasonable expenses of posting notices of such requests.

Asset Status Reports

The Special Servicer will be required to prepare an asset status report that is consistent with the Servicing Standard upon the earlier of (x) within 60 days after the occurrence of a Servicing Transfer Event and (y) prior to taking action with respect to any Major Decision (or making a determination not to take action with respect to a Major Decision) with respect to a Specially Serviced Loan.

Each asset status report will be (i) delivered to the related Directing Holder (but, if the Controlling Class Representative is the related Directing Holder, only prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event and only if it does not relate to an Excluded Mortgage Loan), the Operating Advisor (but only after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event), the Certificate Administrator (and, in the case of any Serviced Loan Combinations, the Serviced Companion Loan Holder) and (ii) made available to the Rating Agencies. If any related Outside Controlling Note Holder (if a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination is involved) or the Controlling Class Representative (if any other Serviced Loan(s) are involved and a Control Termination Event does not exist), as applicable, does not disapprove of a related asset status report within 10 business days of receipt, the related Directing Holder will be deemed to have approved such asset status report and the Special Servicer will implement the recommended action as outlined in such asset status report; provided, however, that the Special Servicer may not take any actions that are contrary to applicable law, the Servicing Standard or the terms of the applicable Mortgage Loan documents. In addition, the related Directing Holder may object to any asset status report within 10 business days of receipt (but, if the Controlling Class Representative is the related Directing Holder, only if a Control Termination Event does not exist); provided, however, that, if the Special Servicer determines that emergency action is necessary to protect the related Mortgaged Property or the interests of the Certificateholders (and, in the case of any Serviced Loan Combinations, the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder), or if a failure to take any such action at such time would be inconsistent with the Servicing Standard, the Special Servicer may take actions with respect to the related Mortgaged Property before the expiration of the 10 business day period if the Special Servicer reasonably determines in accordance with the Servicing Standard that failure to take such actions before the expiration of the 10 business day period would materially and adversely affect the interest of the Certificateholders (and, in the case of any Serviced Loan Combinations, the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder(s)), and the Special Servicer has made a reasonable effort to contact the related Directing Holder (during the period that such Directing Holder has approval rights). The foregoing will not relieve the Special Servicer of its duties to comply with the Servicing Standard.

If the related Directing Holder disapproves such asset status report within 10 business days of receipt (and, if the Controlling Class Representative is the related Directing Holder, a Control Termination Event does not exist)

S-331

and the Special Servicer has not made the affirmative determination described above, the Special Servicer will revise such asset status report as soon as practicable thereafter, but in no event later than 30 days after such disapproval. The Special Servicer will revise such asset status report until the related Directing Holder fails to disapprove such revised asset status report as described above (but, if the Controlling Class Representative is the related Directing Holder, only if a Control Termination Event does not exist) or until the Special Servicer makes a determination, consistent with the Servicing Standard, that such objection is not in the best interests of all the Certificateholders (and, in the case of any Serviced Loan Combinations, the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder(s)). If the related Directing Holder does not approve an asset status report within 60 business days from the first submission of an asset status report, the Special Servicer is required to take such action as directed by the related Directing Holder (but, if the Controlling Class Representative is the related Directing Holder, only if a Control Termination Event does not exist), provided such action does not violate the Servicing Standard.

After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, each of the Operating Advisor and (prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event) the Controlling Class Representative will be entitled to consult on a non-binding basis with the Special Servicer and propose alternative courses of action in respect of any asset status report. After the occurrence and during continuance of a Control Termination Event, the Special Servicer will be obligated to consider such alternative courses of action and any other feedback provided by (a) the Operating Advisor or (b) the Controlling Class Representative, as applicable. With respect to a Serviced Loan Combination, if and when so provided in the related Co-Lender Agreement, any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) will be entitled to consult on a non-binding basis with the Special Servicer and propose alternative courses of action in respect of any asset status report; provided that, in the case of a Serviced Outside Controlled Loan Combination, a related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) may be the related Outside Controlling Note Holder. The Special Servicer may revise the asset status reports as it deems reasonably necessary in accordance with the Servicing Standard to take into account any input and/or recommendations of the Operating Advisor (during the continuance of a Control Termination Event) and, with respect to a Serviced Loan Combination, if and when so provided in the related Co-Lender Agreement, any related Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan Holder (or its representative) (and, during the continuance of a Control Termination Event but prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, the Controlling Class Representative).

The asset status report is not intended to replace or satisfy any specific consent or approval right which the related Directing Holder may have.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Controlling Class Representative will not have any approval or consultation rights with respect to an asset status report that relates to an Excluded Mortgage Loan.

Also, notwithstanding the foregoing, the Special Servicer will not be permitted to follow any advice, direction or consultation provided by the Operating Advisor or the related Directing Holder or, with respect to the Serviced Loan Combinations, the Serviced Companion Loan Holder (or its representative), that would require or cause the Special Servicer to violate any applicable law, be inconsistent with the Servicing Standard, require or cause the Special Servicer to violate provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, require or cause the Special Servicer to violate the terms of any Serviced Mortgage Loan or Serviced Loan Combination, expose any Certificateholder or any party to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or their affiliates officers, directors or agents to any claim, suit or liability, cause either Trust REMIC to fail to qualify as a REMIC or the Grantor Trust to fail to qualify as a grantor trust for federal income tax purposes, result in the imposition of “prohibited transaction” or “prohibited contribution” tax under the REMIC provisions of the Code, or materially expand the scope of the Special Servicer’s responsibilities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or any Co-Lender Agreement.

For the avoidance of doubt, with respect to any Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loan, any Controlling Class Certificateholder that is a Borrower Party, or the Controlling Class Representative if it is a Borrower Party, will be prohibited from accessing Excluded Information related to any Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loan for which it is a related Borrower Party. The Pooling and Servicing Agreement will require the Controlling Class Representative and the Controlling Class Certificateholders to certify that they acknowledge and agree that they are prohibited from accessing and reviewing (and they will agree not to access and review) any Excluded Information with respect to such Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loans for which it is a related Borrower Party (other than such information that is aggregated with information of other Mortgage Loans at a pool level to which the Controlling Class Representative and the Controlling Class Certificateholders are entitled to access).

S-332

Rating Agency Confirmations

The Pooling and Servicing Agreement will provide that, notwithstanding the terms of the related Serviced Mortgage Loan documents or other provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, if any action under the Serviced Mortgage Loan documents or the Pooling and Servicing Agreement requires a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies as a condition precedent to such action, if the party (the “Requesting Party”) required to obtain such Rating Agency Confirmation has made a request to any Rating Agency for such Rating Agency Confirmation and if, within 10 business days of such request being posted to the Rule 17g-5 website established under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, any Rating Agency has not granted such request, rejected such request or provided a Rating Agency Declination (as defined below), then (i) such Requesting Party will be required to promptly request the related Rating Agency Confirmation again and (ii) if there is no response to such second Rating Agency Confirmation request from the applicable Rating Agency within five business days of such second request, whether in the form of granting or rejecting such Rating Agency Confirmation or providing a Rating Agency Declination, then:

(x)        with respect to any condition in any Serviced Mortgage Loan document requiring a Rating Agency Confirmation or any other matter under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement relating to the servicing of the Serviced Mortgage Loans (other than as set forth in clause (y) or (z) below), the Requesting Party (or, if the Requesting Party is the related borrower, then the Master Servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans, if the Master Servicer is processing the action requiring Rating Agency Confirmation) or the Special Servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans, REO Properties and non-Specially Serviced Loans, if the Special Servicer is processing the action requiring Rating Agency Confirmation with respect to such non-Specially Serviced Loans), as applicable) will be required to determine (with the consent of the related Directing Holder, unless, in the case of the Controlling Class Representative, a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing (but in each case only in the case of actions that would otherwise be Major Decisions), which consent shall be pursued by the Special Servicer and deemed given if the related Directing Holder does not respond within seven Business Days of receipt of a request from the Special Servicer to consent to the Requesting Party’s determination), in accordance with its duties under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and in accordance with the Servicing Standard, whether or not such action would be in accordance with the Servicing Standard, and if the Requesting Party (or, if the Requesting Party is the related borrower, then the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable) makes such determination, then the requirement for a Rating Agency Confirmation will not apply (provided, however, with respect to defeasance, release or substitution of any collateral relating to any Serviced Mortgage Loan, any applicable Rating Agency Confirmation requirement in the Serviced Mortgage Loan documents will not apply, even without the determination referred to in this clause (x) by the Requesting Party (or, if the Requesting Party is the related borrower, then the Master Servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans, if the Master Servicer is processing the action requiring Rating Agency Confirmation) or the Special Servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans, REO Properties and non-Specially Serviced Loans, if the Special Servicer is processing the action requiring Rating Agency Confirmation with respect to such non-Specially Serviced Loans), as applicable); provided, that the Master Servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans, if the Master Servicer is processing the action requiring Rating Agency Confirmation) or the Special Servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans, REO Properties and non-Specially Serviced Loans, if the Special Servicer is processing the action requiring Rating Agency Confirmation with respect to such non-Specially Serviced Loans), as applicable, will in any event review the other conditions required under the related Serviced Mortgage Loan documents with respect to such defeasance, release or substitution and confirm to its satisfaction in accordance with the Servicing Standard that such conditions (other than the requirement for a Rating Agency Confirmation) have been satisfied);

(y)        with respect to a replacement of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, such condition will be considered satisfied if:

(1)  Moody’s has not cited servicing concerns of the applicable replacement master servicer or special servicer as the sole or material factor in any qualification, downgrade or withdrawal of the ratings (or placement on “watch status” in contemplation of a ratings downgrade or withdrawal) of securities in any other CMBS transaction serviced by the applicable servicer prior to the time of determination, if Moody’s is the non-responding Rating Agency;

S-333

(2)  the applicable replacement master servicer has a master servicer rating of at least “CMS3” from Fitch or the applicable replacement special servicer has a special servicer rating of at least “CSS3” from Fitch, if Fitch is the non-responding Rating Agency; and

(3)  as certified to, in writing, by such replacement master servicer or replacement special servicer, as applicable, the replacement master servicer or replacement special servicer is acting as master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, in a commercial mortgage loan securitization that was rated by a Rating Agency within the 12-month period prior to the date of determination and Morningstar has not qualified, downgraded or withdrawn the then-current rating or ratings of one or more classes of CMBS certificates citing servicing concerns with the replacement master servicer or replacement special servicer, as applicable, as the sole or material factor in such rating action, if Morningstar is the non-responding Rating Agency; and

(z)        with respect to a replacement or successor of the Operating Advisor, such condition will be deemed to be waived with respect to any non-responding Rating Agency so long as such Rating Agency has not cited concerns regarding the replacement operating advisor as the sole or material factor in any qualification, downgrade or withdrawal of the ratings (or placement on “watch status” in contemplation of a ratings downgrade or withdrawal) of securities in any other CMBS transaction with respect to which the replacement operating advisor acts as trust advisor or operating advisor prior to the time of determination.

For all other matters or actions (a) not specifically discussed above in clauses (x), (y), or (z) above, and (b) that are not the subject of a Rating Agency Declination, the applicable Requesting Party will be required to obtain a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies. In the event an action otherwise requires a Rating Agency Confirmation from each of the Rating Agencies, in absence of such Rating Agency Confirmation, we cannot assure you that any Rating Agency will not downgrade, qualify or withdraw its ratings as a result of any such action taken by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer in accordance with the procedures discussed above.

“Rating Agency Confirmation” means, with respect to any matter, confirmation in writing (which may be in electronic form) by each applicable Rating Agency that a proposed action, failure to act or other event specified in this prospectus supplement will not in and of itself result in the downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of the then-current rating assigned to any Class of Certificates (if then rated by the Rating Agency); provided that upon receipt of a written waiver or acknowledgment from any applicable Rating Agency indicating its decision not to review or declining to review the matter for which the Rating Agency Confirmation is sought (such written notice, a “Rating Agency Declination”), the requirement to receive a Rating Agency Confirmation from the applicable Rating Agency with respect to such matter will not apply.

In addition, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will provide that, notwithstanding the terms of the related Serviced Mortgage Loan documents, the other provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or the related Co-Lender Agreement, with respect to any Serviced Companion Loan Securities, if any action relating to the servicing and administration of the related Serviced Loan or any related REO Property (including, but not limited to, the replacement of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or a sub-servicer) requires delivery of a Rating Agency Confirmation as a condition precedent to such action pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, then such action will also require delivery of a rating agency confirmation as a condition precedent to such action from each rating agency that was or will be engaged by a party to the securitization of the Serviced Companion Loan to assign a rating to such Serviced Companion Loan Securities. The requirement to obtain a rating agency confirmation with respect to any Serviced Companion Loan Securities will be subject to, and will be permitted to be waived by the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer on, and will be deemed not to apply on, the same terms and conditions applicable to obtaining Rating Agency Confirmations, as described above and in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

Termination; Retirement of Certificates

The obligations created by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will terminate upon payment (or provision for payment) to all Certificateholders of all amounts held by the Certificate Administrator and required to be paid following the earlier of (1) the final payment (or related Advance) or other liquidation of the last Mortgage Loan or REO Property, (2) the voluntary exchange of all the then outstanding certificates as described below under “—Optional Termination; Optional Mortgage Loan Purchase” or (3) the purchase or other liquidation of all of the assets of the Issuing Entity as described under “—Optional Termination; Optional Mortgage Loan Purchase”

S-334

below. Written notice of termination of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will be given by the Certificate Administrator to each Certificateholder and each Rating Agency and the final distribution will be made only upon surrender and cancellation of the Certificates at the office of the Certificate Registrar or other location specified in the notice of termination.

Optional Termination; Optional Mortgage Loan Purchase

The holders of the Controlling Class representing greater than 50% of the Certificate Principal Amount of the Controlling Class, and if the Controlling Class does not exercise its option, the Special Servicer and, if the Special Servicer does not exercise its option, the Master Servicer and, if none of the Controlling Class Certificateholders, the Special Servicer or the Master Servicer exercises its option, the holders of the Class R Certificates, representing greater than a 50% Percentage Interest of the Class R Certificates, will have the option to purchase all of the Mortgage Loans (in the case of any Serviced Loan Combinations, subject to certain rights of the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder provided for in the related Co-Lender Agreement) and all property acquired in respect of any Mortgage Loan remaining in the Issuing Entity, and thereby effect termination of the Issuing Entity and early retirement of the then outstanding Certificates, on any Distribution Date on which the aggregate Stated Principal Balance of the Mortgage Loans remaining in the Issuing Entity is less than 1% of the aggregate Stated Principal Balance of such Mortgage Loans as of the Cut-off Date (excluding for purposes of this calculation, The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan, which as of the closing date, has a stated maturity date beyond the tenth anniversary of the closing date). The purchase price payable upon the exercise of such option on such a Distribution Date will be an amount equal to (i) the sum of (A) the aggregate Repurchase Price (excluding the amount described in clause (vi) of the definition of “Repurchase Price”) of all the Mortgage Loans (exclusive of REO Mortgage Loans) included in the Issuing Entity, (B) the appraised value of the Issuing Entity’s portion of each REO Property, if any, included in the Issuing Entity, as determined by the Special Servicer (such appraisals in clause (i)(B) to be obtained by the Special Servicer and prepared by an Appraiser in accordance with MAI standards) and (C) the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses of the Master Servicer (unless the Master Servicer is the purchaser of such Mortgage Loans), the Special Servicer (unless the Special Servicer is the purchaser of such Mortgage Loans), the Trustee and the Certificate Administrator, as applicable, with respect to such termination, minus (ii) solely in the case where the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer is effecting such purchase, the aggregate amount of unreimbursed Advances, if any, made by the purchasing Master Servicer or Special Servicer, together with any interest accrued and payable to the purchasing Master Servicer or Special Servicer, as applicable, in respect of such Advances and any unpaid Servicing Fees or Special Servicing Fees, as applicable, remaining outstanding (which items will be deemed to have been paid or reimbursed to the purchasing Master Servicer or Special Servicer, as applicable, in connection with such purchase). We cannot assure you that payment of the Certificate Principal Amount, if any, of each outstanding Class of Certificates plus accrued interest would be made in full in the event of such a termination of the Issuing Entity.

The Issuing Entity may also be terminated upon the exchange of all then outstanding Certificates (excluding the Class R Certificates) for the Mortgage Loans and each REO Property (or interests in the Mortgage Loans and each REO Property) remaining in the Issuing Entity at any time the aggregate Certificate Principal Amounts of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class D Certificates and the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Trust Components (and, correspondingly, the Class A-S, Class B, Class C and Class PEZ Certificates) and the Notional Amounts of the Class X-A and Class X-D Certificates have been reduced to zero and the Master Servicer is paid a fee specified in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, but all the holders of such Classes of outstanding Regular Certificates would have to voluntarily participate in such exchange.

Reports to Certificateholders; Available Information

Certificate Administrator Reports

On each Distribution Date, the Certificate Administrator will be required to provide or make available to each Certificateholder of record a Distribution Date statement in the form of Annex D to this prospectus supplement providing information relating to distributions made on that date for the relevant Class and the recent status of the Mortgage Loans.

In addition, the Certificate Administrator will provide or make available, to the extent received from the applicable person, on each Distribution Date to each Privileged Person the following reports (other than clause (1) below, the “CREFC® Reports”) prepared by the Master Servicer, the Certificate Administrator or the Special

S-335

Servicer, as applicable, substantially in the forms provided in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (which forms are subject to change) and including substantially the following information:

(1) a report as of the close of business on the immediately preceding Determination Date, containing some categories of information regarding the Mortgage Loans provided in Annex C to this prospectus supplement in the tables under the caption “Mortgage Pool Information,” calculated, where applicable, on the basis of the most recent relevant information provided by the borrowers to the Master Servicer and by the Master Servicer to the Certificate Administrator, and presented in a loan-by-loan and tabular format substantially similar to the formats utilized in Annex A to this prospectus supplement;

(2) a Commercial Real Estate Finance Council (“CREFC®”) delinquent loan status report;

(3) a CREFC® historical loan modification/forbearance and corrected mortgage loan report;

(4) a CREFC® advance recovery report;

(5) a CREFC® total loan report;

(6) a CREFC® operating statement analysis report;

(7) a CREFC® comparative financial status report;

(8) a CREFC® net operating income adjustment worksheet;

(9) a CREFC® real estate owned status report;

(10) a CREFC® servicer watch list;

(11) a CREFC® loan level reserve and letter of credit report;

(12) a CREFC® property file;

(13) a CREFC® financial file;

(14) a CREFC® loan setup file; and

(15) a CREFC® loan periodic update file.

The Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, may omit any information from these reports that the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer regards as confidential. None of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee or the Certificate Administrator will be responsible for the accuracy or completeness of any information supplied to it by a borrower, the Depositor, any Sponsor, any Outside Servicer, any Outside Special Servicer or other similar party under any Outside Servicing Agreement or other third party that is included in any reports, statements, materials or information prepared or provided by the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee or the Certificate Administrator, as applicable. Some information will be made available to Certificateholders by electronic transmission as may be agreed upon between the Depositor and the Certificate Administrator.

Before each Distribution Date, the Master Servicer will deliver to the Certificate Administrator by electronic means:

· a CREFC® property file;

· a CREFC® financial file;

· a CREFC® loan setup file; and

· a CREFC® loan periodic update file.

S-336

In addition, the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, is also required to prepare the following for each Mortgaged Property and REO Property related to a Serviced Mortgage Loan:

· Within 30 days after receipt of a quarterly operating statement, if any, for each calendar quarter, commencing with the calendar quarter ending March 31, 2016, a CREFC® operating statement analysis report but only to the extent the related borrower is required by the related Mortgage Loan documents to deliver and does deliver, or otherwise agrees to provide and does provide, that information, for the Mortgaged Property or REO Property as of the end of that calendar quarter; provided, however, that any analysis or report with respect to the first calendar quarter of each year will not be required to the extent provided in the then current applicable CREFC® guidelines (it being understood that as of the date of this prospectus supplement, the applicable CREFC® guidelines provide that such analysis or report with respect to the first calendar quarter (in each year) is not required for a Mortgaged Property unless such Mortgaged Property is analyzed on a trailing 12-month basis, or if the related Serviced Mortgage Loan is on the CREFC® Servicer Watch List). The Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, will deliver to the Certificate Administrator, the Operating Advisor and, with respect to any Serviced Loan Combinations, the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder by electronic means the operating statement analysis upon request.

· Within 30 days after receipt by the Special Servicer (with respect to Specially Serviced Loans and REO Properties) or the Master Servicer (with respect to non-Specially Serviced Loans) of an annual operating statement for each calendar year commencing with the calendar year ending December 31, 2015, a CREFC® net operating income adjustment worksheet, but only to the extent the related borrower is required by the mortgage to deliver and does deliver, or otherwise agrees to provide and does provide, that information, presenting the computation made in accordance with the methodology described in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to “normalize” the full year net operating income and debt service coverage numbers used by the Master Servicer to satisfy its reporting obligation described in clause (7) above. The Special Servicer or the Master Servicer will deliver to the Certificate Administrator, the Operating Advisor and, with respect to any Serviced Loan Combinations, the related Serviced Companion Loan Holder by electronic means the CREFC® net operating income adjustment worksheet upon request.

Certificate Owners and Serviced Companion Loan Holders who are Privileged Persons may also obtain access to any of the Certificate Administrator reports upon request and pursuant to the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. Otherwise, until the time Definitive Certificates are issued to evidence the Certificates, the information described above will be available to the related Certificate Owners only if DTC and its participants provide the information to Certificate Owners. See “Risk Factors—Book-Entry Registration Will Mean You Will Not Be Recognized as a Holder of Record” in this prospectus supplement.

Information Available Electronically

The Certificate Administrator will make available to any Privileged Person (provided that this prospectus supplement, the Distribution Date statements, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements and the SEC EDGAR filings referred to below (collectively, the “Public Documents”) will be made available to the general public, and provided further that (except as described below with respect to the Special Servicer, any Controlling Class Certificateholder and the Controlling Class Representative) any Privileged Person that is a Borrower Party will only be entitled to access Public Documents), via the Certificate Administrator’s website:

(A)        the following “deal documents”:

· the prospectus and this prospectus supplement;

· the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, each sub-servicing agreement delivered to the Certificate Administrator from and after the Closing Date, if any, and the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements and any amendments and exhibits to those agreements; and

· the CREFC® loan setup file, delivered to the Certificate Administrator by the Master Servicer;

S-337

(B)        the following “SEC EDGAR filings”:

· any reports on Forms 10-D, 10-K and 8-K that have been filed by the Certificate Administrator with respect to the Issuing Entity through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering and Retrieval (EDGAR) system;

(C)        the following “periodic reports”:

· the Distribution Date statements;

· the CREFC® bond level files;

· the CREFC® collateral summary files;

· the CREFC® Reports (other than the CREFC® loan setup file), provided they are received by the Certificate Administrator; and

· the annual reports prepared by the Operating Advisor;

(D)        the following “additional documents”:

· the summary of any final asset status report delivered to the Certificate Administrator in electronic format; and

· any Third Party Reports (or updates of Third Party Reports) delivered to the Certificate Administrator in electronic format;

(E)        the following “special notices”:

· all special notices sent by the Certificate Administrator to the Certificateholders as described in “Description of the Offered Certificates—Certificateholder Communication—Special Notices” in this prospectus supplement;

· notice of any request by the holders of Certificates evidencing at least 25% of the Voting Rights of the Certificates to terminate and replace the Special Servicer or notice of any request by the holders of Non-Reduced Certificates evidencing at least 15% of the Voting Rights of the Non-Reduced Certificates to terminate and replace the Operating Advisor;

· notice of any waiver, modification or amendment of any term of any Mortgage Loan;

· notice of final payment on the Certificates;

· all notices of the occurrence of any Servicer Termination Events received by the Certificate Administrator;

· notice of termination or resignation of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee, any Outside Servicer, any Outside Special Servicer, any Outside Trustee (and appointments of successors to the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee, any Outside Servicer, any Outside Special Servicer or any Outside Trustee);

· officer’s certificates supporting any determination that any Advance was (or, if made, would be) a Non-Recoverable Advance;

· notice of the termination of the Issuing Entity;

· notice of the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event;

S-338

· notice of the occurrence and continuance of a Consultation Termination Event;

· any Assessment of Compliance delivered to the Certificate Administrator; and

· any Attestation Reports delivered to the Certificate Administrator;

(F)        the “Investor Q&A Forum”; and

(G)        solely to Certificateholders and Certificate Owners, the “Investor Registry”.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Controlling Class Representative or any Controlling Class Certificateholder is a Borrower Party with respect to any related Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loan (each, an “Excluded Controlling Class Holder” with respect to such Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loan only), such Excluded Controlling Class Holder is required to promptly notify each of the Master Servicer, Special Servicer, Operating Advisor, Trustee and Certificate Administrator pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and provide a new Investor Certification pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and will not be entitled to access any Excluded Information (as defined below) solely with respect to such related Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loan. The Pooling and Servicing Agreement will require each Excluded Controlling Class Holder in such new Investor Certification to certify that it acknowledges and agrees that it is prohibited from accessing and reviewing (and it agrees not to access and review) any Excluded Information with respect to any Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loans for which it is a Borrower Party. In addition, if the Controlling Class Representative or any Controlling Class Certificateholder is not an Excluded Controlling Class Holder, such person will certify and agree that they will not share any Excluded Information with any Excluded Controlling Class Holder.

“Excluded Information” means, with respect to any Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loan, any asset status reports, Final Asset Status Reports (or summaries thereof) and such other information specifically related to such Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loan or any related Mortgaged Property as may be specified in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

The Certificate Administrator may require a recipient of any of the information set forth above (other than the Public Documents) to execute a confidentiality agreement (which may be in the form of a web page “click-through”).

The Certificate Administrator will be required to make the “Investor Q&A Forum” available to Privileged Persons via the Certificate Administrator’s website, where Certificateholders and Certificate Owners may (a) submit inquiries to the Certificate Administrator relating to the Distribution Date statement, (b) submit inquiries to the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer relating to servicing reports prepared by that party, the Mortgage Loans or the Mortgaged Properties, (c) submit inquiries to the Operating Advisor relating to its annual reports or actions by the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer as to which the Operating Advisor has consultation rights, whether or not referenced in such an annual report and (d) view previously submitted inquiries and related answers. The Certificate Administrator will forward such inquiries to the appropriate person. The Certificate Administrator, the Operating Advisor, the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, will be required to answer each inquiry, unless it determines, in its respective sole discretion, that (i) the inquiry is not of a type described above, (ii) answering the inquiry (A) would not be in the best interests of the Issuing Entity and/or the Certificateholders, (B) would be in violation of applicable law, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement or the applicable Mortgage Loan documents, (C) would materially increase the duties of, or result in significant additional cost or expense to, the Certificate Administrator, the Operating Advisor, the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, or (D) would reasonably be expected to result in the waiver of an attorney-client privilege or the disclosure of attorney work product or (iii) it is otherwise not advisable to answer. The Certificate Administrator will be required to post the inquiries and related answers on the Investor Q&A Forum, subject to and in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. No party to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will be permitted to disclose Privileged Information in the Investor Q&A Forum.

The Investor Q&A Forum may not reflect questions, answers and other communications that are not submitted through the Certificate Administrator’s website. Answers posted on the Investor Q&A Forum will be attributable only to the respondent, and no other person will certify as to the accuracy, or will have any responsibility or liability for the content of any such information.

S-339

The Certificate Administrator will be required to make the “Investor Registry” available to any Certificateholder and Certificate Owner via the Certificate Administrator’s website. Certificateholders and Certificate Owners may register on a voluntary basis for the Investor Registry and obtain information on any other Certificateholder or Certificate Owner that has also registered; provided that they comply with certain requirements as provided for in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

The Certificate Administrator’s website will initially be located at www.sf.citidirect.com.

Access will be provided by the Certificate Administrator to such persons upon receipt by the Certificate Administrator from such person of an Investor Certification in the form(s) attached to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which form(s) will also be located on the Certificate Administrator’s website. The parties to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will not be required to provide that certification.

In connection with providing access to the Certificate Administrator’s website, the Certificate Administrator may require registration and the acceptance of a disclaimer. The Certificate Administrator will not be liable for the dissemination of information in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. The Certificate Administrator will make no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of such documents and will assume no responsibility for them. In addition, the Certificate Administrator may disclaim responsibility for any information distributed by the Certificate Administrator for which it is not the original source. Assistance in using the website can be obtained by calling the Certificate Administrator’s customer service desk at 1-888-422-2066.

“Privileged Person” means the Depositor, the underwriters, the initial purchasers, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Excluded Mortgage Loan Special Servicer, the Controlling Class Representative (but only for so long as a Consultation Termination Event has not occurred and is not continuing), any Serviced Companion Loan Holder that delivers an Investor Certification, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Operating Advisor, the Sponsors, a designee of the Depositor and any person who provides the Certificate Administrator with an Investor Certification; provided, that in no event will an Excluded Controlling Class Holder be entitled to Excluded Information with respect to an Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loan with respect to which it is a Borrower Party (but this exclusion will not apply to any other Mortgage Loan). In no event will a borrower, manager of a Mortgaged Property, affiliate of any of the foregoing or an agent, principal, partner, member, joint venturer, limited partner, employee, representative, director, trustee, advisor or investor in or of any of the foregoing be considered a Privileged Person; provided that the foregoing will not be applicable to, nor limit, an Excluded Controlling Class Holder’s right to access information with respect to any Mortgage Loan other than Excluded Information with respect to a related Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage Loan.

The Controlling Class Representative, each Controlling Class Certificateholder and the Special Servicer will be considered a Privileged Person with respect to any Mortgage Loans or Serviced Loan Combinations for which it is not then a Borrower Party, and the limitations on access to information set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will apply only with respect the related Mortgage Loan for which the applicable party is a Borrower Party and only with respect to the related Excluded Information.

Other Information

The Certificate Administrator (or, in the case of the Mortgage Files, the Trustee) will make available at its offices (or, in the case of the Trustee, at the offices of a custodian appointed by it), during normal business hours, for review by any Privileged Person originals or copies of the following items to the extent they are prepared by or delivered to the Certificate Administrator (or the Trustee or a custodian appointed by it, as applicable):

· the prospectus and this prospectus supplement;

· the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, each sub-servicing agreement delivered to the Certificate Administrator from and after the Closing Date, if any, the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreements and any amendments and exhibits to those agreements;

· all Certificate Administrator reports made available to holders of each relevant class of Certificates since the Closing Date;

S-340

· all Distribution Date statements and all CREFC® Reports delivered or made available to Certificateholders;

· all Assessments of Compliance and Attestation Reports delivered to the Certificate Administrator since the Closing Date;

· the most recent property inspection report prepared by or on behalf of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, and delivered to the Certificate Administrator for each Mortgaged Property;

· any and all notices and reports delivered to the Certificate Administrator with respect to any Mortgaged Property as to which the environmental testing revealed certain environmental issues;

· the Mortgage Files, including any and all modifications, waivers and amendments to the terms of the Mortgage Loans entered into or consented to by the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, any Outside Servicer or any Outside Special Servicer and delivered to the Trustee or a custodian appointed by it;

· the summary of any final asset status report delivered to the Certificate Administrator and the annual, quarterly and monthly operating statements, if any, collected by or on behalf of the Master Servicer or the Special Servicer, as applicable, and delivered to the Certificate Administrator for each Mortgaged Property;

· officer’s certificates supporting any determination that any Advance was (or, if made, would be) a Non-Recoverable Advance;

· notice of termination or resignation of the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee, any Outside Servicer, any Outside Special Servicer or any Outside Trustee (and appointments of successors to the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee, any Outside Servicer, any Outside Special Servicer or any Outside Trustee);

· notice of any request by at least 25% of the Voting Rights of the Certificates to terminate and replace the Special Servicer or notice of any request by at least 15% of the Voting Rights of the Non-Reduced Certificates to terminate and replace the Operating Advisor;

· all special notices sent by the Certificate Administrator to the Certificateholders pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement;

· any Third Party Reports (or updates of Third Party Reports) delivered to the Certificate Administrator in electronic format; and

· any other information that may be necessary to satisfy the requirements of subsection (d)(4)(i) of Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

The Certificate Administrator will provide copies of the items described above upon reasonable written request. The Certificate Administrator may require payment for the reasonable costs and expenses of providing the copies and may also require a confirmation executed by the requesting person or entity, in a form reasonably acceptable to the Certificate Administrator, to the effect that the person or entity making the request is a beneficial owner or prospective purchaser of Certificates, is requesting the information solely for use in evaluating its investment in the Certificates and will otherwise keep the information confidential. Certificateholders, by the acceptance of their Certificates, will be deemed to have agreed to keep this information confidential. The Master Servicer may, but is not required to, make information available over the internet.

The Certificate Administrator will make available all Distribution Date Statements, CREFC® Reports and supplemental notices (provided they are received by the Certificate Administrator) to certain modeling financial services (i.e., Bloomberg, L.P., Trepp, LLC, Intex Solutions, Inc., BlackRock Financial Management, Inc. and Markit Group Limited).

S-341

The Certificate Administrator is responsible for the preparation of tax returns on behalf of the Issuing Entity and the preparation of monthly reports on Form 10-D (based on information included in each monthly statement to Certificateholders and other information provided by other transaction parties) and annual reports on Form 10-K and other reports on Form 8-K that are required to be filed with the SEC on behalf of the Issuing Entity.

The Master Servicer may (but will not be required to), in accordance with such rules and procedures as it may adopt in its sole discretion, make available through the Master Servicer’s website or otherwise, any additional information relating to the Mortgage Loans, the related Mortgaged Properties or the related borrower that is not Privileged Information, for review by the Depositor, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer and the Operating Advisor.

Servicing of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans

Each Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan, and any related REO Property, will be serviced under the applicable Outside Servicing Agreement. Accordingly, the applicable Outside Servicer will generally make servicing advances and remit collections on the respective Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan to or on behalf of the Issuing Entity. However, the Master Servicer will generally be obligated to compile reports that include information on the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans, and make P&I Advances with respect to the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans, subject to their non-recoverability determination. The servicing arrangements under the Outside Servicing Agreements differ in certain respects to the servicing arrangements under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

In addition, pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, except as expressly addressed in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, with respect to each Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan:

· The Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, the Certificate Administrator and the Trustee under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement will have no obligation or authority to (a) supervise the applicable Outside Servicer, the applicable Outside Special Servicer, the applicable Outside Trustee or any other party to the applicable Outside Servicing Agreement or (b) make property protection advances with respect to such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan. The obligation of the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer to provide information to the Trustee or any other person with respect to the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans is dependent on their receipt of the corresponding information from the applicable Outside Servicer or the applicable Outside Special Servicer.

· If a party to the applicable Outside Servicing Agreement requests the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator or the Custodian to consent to a modification, waiver or amendment of, or other loan-level action related to, the applicable Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan (except a modification, waiver or amendment of the applicable Outside Servicing Agreement or the related Co-Lender Agreement), then the party that receives such request will be required to promptly deliver a copy of such request to the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer, and the Master Servicer (if such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan is not part of a “specially serviced loan” under the applicable Outside Servicing Agreement and only to the extent that the action would not be considered a Major Decision or a Special Servicer Decision) or the Special Servicer (if such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan is part of a “specially serviced loan” under the applicable Outside Servicing Agreement or if the action would be considered a Major Decision or a Special Servicer Decision) will be required to exercise such right of consent, with, in the case of a matter that would be a Major Decision, the consent of the Controlling Class Representative unless a Control Termination Event exists or such Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan is an Excluded Mortgage Loan; provided, that if the applicable Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan were serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and such action would not be permitted without Rating Agency Confirmation, then the Master Servicer or Special Servicer, as applicable, will not be permitted to exercise such consent right without first having obtained such Rating Agency Confirmation (payable at the expense of the party requesting such consent or approval if such requesting party is a Certificateholder or a party to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and otherwise from the Collection Account).

· If the Trustee receives a request (and, if the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Certificate Administrator receives such request, such party will be required to promptly forward such request to the Trustee) from any party to the applicable Outside Servicing Agreement for consent to or

S-342

approval of a modification, waiver or amendment of the applicable Outside Servicing Agreement and/or the related Co-Lender Agreement, or the adoption of any servicing agreement that is the successor to and/or in replacement of the applicable Outside Servicing Agreement in effect as of the Closing Date or a change in servicer under the applicable Outside Servicing Agreement, then the Trustee will grant such consent or approval if (a) the Trustee has received a prior Rating Agency Confirmation from each Rating Agency (payable at the expense of the party making such request for consent or approval to the Trustee, if a Certificateholder or a party to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and otherwise from the Collection Account) with respect to such consent or approval, and (b) unless a Control Termination Event has occurred and is continuing, the Trustee will be required to obtain the consent of the Controlling Class Representative prior to granting any such consent. During the continuation of any termination event with respect to the related Outside Servicer or Outside Special Servicer under the applicable Outside Servicing Agreement, each of the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer shall have the right (but not the obligation) to take all actions to enforce its rights and remedies and to protect the interests, and enforce the rights and remedies, of the Trust (including the institution and prosecution of all judicial, administrative and other proceedings and the filings of proofs of claim and debt in connection therewith); provided that, at the direction of the Certificateholders evidencing at least 25% of the aggregate of all Voting Rights, the Trustee will make a request to the related Outside Trustee for the termination of the related Outside Servicer or Outside Special Servicer, as applicable, pursuant to the terms of the applicable Outside Servicing Agreement or if applicable pursuant to the terms of the applicable Outside Servicing Agreement with respect to a termination event involving the related Outside Servicer, the appointment of a new sub-servicer with respect to the related Outside Serviced Loan Combination. The reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the Master Servicer, Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, or the Trustee in connection with such enforcement will be paid by the Master Servicer out of the Collection Account.

· Each of the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer will be required to reasonably cooperate with the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or the Controlling Class Representative (if no Control Termination Event Exists), as applicable, to facilitate the exercise by such party of any consent or approval rights set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; provided, however, the Trustee, the Certificate Administrator, the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer will have no right or obligation to exercise any consent or consultation rights or obtain a Rating Agency Confirmation on behalf of the Controlling Class Representative.

Servicing of The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan

The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan and any related REO Property will be serviced under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement. Accordingly, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer will generally make property protection advances and remit collections on The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan to or on behalf of the Issuing Entity. However, the Master Servicer will generally be obligated to compile reports that include information on The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan and make P&I Advances with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan, subject to any non-recoverability determination.

The servicing arrangements with respect to loan combinations serviced under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement are generally similar to, but differ in certain respects from, the servicing arrangements with respect to Loan Combinations serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. In that regard, in the case of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the following are considerations relating to servicing, including the identification of some (but not all) of the differences in servicing provisions between the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the Pooling and Servicing Agreement:

· Pursuant to the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the liquidation fee, the special servicing fee and the workout fee with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan will be similar to the corresponding fees payable under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and will be payable in the amounts described under “Transaction Parties—Servicing Compensation, Operating Advisor Compensation and Payment of Expenses—Special Servicing Compensation” in this prospectus supplement.

S-343

· The CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer will earn a primary servicing fee with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan that is to be calculated at 0.0025% per annum.

· The Master Servicer or the Trustee, as applicable, will be required to make P&I Advances with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan, unless the Master Servicer or the Trustee, as applicable, or the Special Servicer, has determined that such advance would not be recoverable from collections on The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan. The Special Servicer may, at its option, make a determination in accordance with the Servicing Standard that any proposed P&I Advance, if made, would be a Non-Recoverable Advance, which determination will be conclusive and binding on the Master Servicer and the Trustee.

· The CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer is obligated to make property protection advances with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination. If the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer determines that a property protection advance it made with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination or the related Mortgaged Property is nonrecoverable, it will be entitled to be reimbursed first from collections on, and proceeds of, The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan and The Decoration & Design Building Pari Passu Companion Loan, on a pro rata basis (based on each such loan’s outstanding principal balance), and then from general collections on all the Mortgage Loans and from general collections of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Issuing Entity, on a pro rata basis (based on each such loan’s outstanding principal balance).

· The CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer will be required to take actions with respect to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan, as applicable, if such Mortgage Loan becomes the equivalent of a Defaulted Mortgage Loan, which actions are substantially similar to the actions described under “—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans—Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties” in this prospectus supplement.

· With respect to The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan, the servicing provisions relating to performing inspections and collecting operating information are substantially similar to those of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

· The requirement of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer to make compensating interest payments in respect of The Decoration & Design Building Mortgage Loan is similar to the requirement of the Master Servicer to make Compensating Interest Payments in respect of the Serviced Mortgage Loans under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

· The CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer and CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer (a) have rights related to resignation substantially similar to those of the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer and (b) are subject to servicer termination events substantially similar to those in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, as well as the rights related thereto.

· The rating agencies rating the securities issued under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement vary from the rating agencies rating the Certificates, which may cause servicing arrangements (including, but not limited to, servicer termination events) to be different under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement than under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

· The specific types of actions constituting major decisions under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement may differ in certain respects from those actions that constitute Major Decisions under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and therefore the specific types of servicer actions with respect to which the applicable outside controlling class representative will be permitted to consent will correspondingly differ.

· The liability of the parties to the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement will be limited in a manner similar, but not necessarily identical, to the liability of the parties to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

· Collections on The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination will be maintained under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement in a manner similar, but not necessarily identical,

S-344

to collections on the Serviced Mortgage Loans and the Serviced Loan Combinations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, provided that rating requirements for accounts and permitted investments may vary under those two pooling and servicing agreements.

· The CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement differs from the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in certain respects relating to one or more of the following: timing, control or consultation triggers or thresholds, terminology, allocation of ministerial duties between multiple servicers or other service providers, certificateholder or investor voting or consent thresholds, master servicer and special servicer termination events and the circumstances under which approvals, consents, consultation, notices or rating agency confirmations may be required.

The CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer may be removed at any time, with or without cause, by the applicable holders of the CGCMT 2015-P1 certificates if a control termination event with respect to the CGCMT 2015-P1 Controlling Class Representative has occurred and is continuing under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement. For so long as such a control termination event does not exist, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer may be replaced without cause at the direction of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Controlling Class Representative subject to certain conditions described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations—The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination—Special Servicer Appointment Rights” in this prospectus supplement. The CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer may also resign under the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement in certain circumstances.

The CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Certificate Administrator, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Trustee, the CGCMT 2015-P1 Operating Advisor and the CGCMT 2015-P1 depositor and various related persons and entities will be entitled to be indemnified by the Issuing Entity for certain losses and liabilities incurred by such party in accordance with the terms and conditions of the related Co-Lender Agreement.

See also “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations—The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination” in this prospectus supplement.

Prospective investors are encouraged to review the full provisions of the CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which is available online at www.sec.gov or by requesting a copy from the underwriters.

Servicing of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan

The Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan and any related REO Property will be serviced under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement. Accordingly, the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer will generally make property protection advances and remit collections on the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan to or on behalf of the Issuing Entity. However, the Master Servicer will generally be obligated to compile reports that include information on the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan, and, to the extent required by the Servicing Standard, to enforce the rights of the holder of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan under the terms of the related Co-Lender Agreement and make P&I Advances with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan, subject to any non-recoverability determination.

The servicing arrangements with respect to loan combinations serviced under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement are generally similar to, but differ in certain respects from, the servicing arrangements with respect to Loan Combinations serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. In that regard, in the case of the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the following are considerations relating to servicing, including the identification of some (but not all) of the differences in servicing provisions between the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the Pooling and Servicing Agreement:

· Pursuant to the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the liquidation fee, the special servicing fee and the workout fee with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan will be similar to the corresponding fees payable under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and will be payable in the amounts described above under “Transaction Parties—Servicing Compensation, Operating Advisor Compensation and Payment of Expenses—Special Servicing Compensation” in this prospectus supplement.

S-345

· The WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer (or a primary servicer) will earn a primary servicing fee with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan that is to be calculated at 0.01% per annum.

· The Master Servicer or the Trustee, as applicable, will be required to make P&I Advances with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan, unless the Master Servicer or the Trustee, as applicable, or the Special Servicer, has determined that such advance would not be recoverable from collections on such Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan. The Special Servicer may, at its option, make a determination in accordance with the Servicing Standard that any proposed P&I Advance, if made, would be a Non-Recoverable Advance, which determination will be conclusive and binding on the Master Servicer and the Trustee.

· The WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer is obligated to make property protection advances with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination. If the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer determines that a property protection advance it made with respect to the related Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination or the related Mortgaged Property is nonrecoverable, it will be entitled to be reimbursed first from collections on, and proceeds of, the related Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan and the related Companion Loans, on a pro rata basis (based on each such loan’s outstanding principal balance), and then from general collections on all the Mortgage Loans, from general collections of the WFCM 2015-C30 Issuing Entity and from general collections on the mortgage loans included in any securitization of any related non-controlling companion loan, on a pro rata basis (based on each such loan’s outstanding principal balance).

· The WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer will be required to take actions with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan if it becomes the equivalent of a Defaulted Mortgage Loan, which actions are substantially similar to the actions described under “—Realization Upon Mortgage Loans—Sale of Defaulted Mortgage Loans and REO Properties” in this prospectus supplement.

· With respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan, the servicing provisions relating to performing inspections and collecting operating information are substantially similar to those of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

· The requirement of the WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer to make compensating interest payments in respect of the Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage Loan is similar to the requirement of the Master Servicer to make Compensating Interest Payments in respect of the Serviced Mortgage Loans under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

· The WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer and WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer (a) have rights related to resignation substantially similar to those of the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer and (b) are subject to servicer termination events substantially similar to those in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, as well as the rights related thereto.

· The specific types of actions constituting major decisions under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement may differ in certain respects from those actions that constitute Major Decisions under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and therefore the specific types of servicer actions with respect to which the applicable outside controlling class representative will be permitted to consent will correspondingly differ.

· The liability of the parties to the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement will be limited in a manner similar, but not necessarily identical, to the liability of the parties to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

· Collections on the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination will be maintained under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement in a manner similar, but not necessarily identical, to collections on the Serviced Mortgage Loans and the Serviced Loan Combinations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, provided that rating requirements for accounts and permitted investments may vary under those two pooling and servicing agreements.

S-346

· The WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement differs from the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in certain respects relating to one or more of the following: timing, control or consultation triggers or thresholds, terminology, allocation of ministerial duties between multiple servicers or other service providers, certificateholder or investor voting or consent thresholds, master servicer and special servicer termination events and the circumstances under which approvals, consents, consultation, notices or rating agency confirmations may be required.

The WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer may be removed at any time, with or without cause, by the applicable holders of the WFCM 2015-C30 Certificates if a control termination event with respect to the applicable outside controlling class representative has occurred and is continuing under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement. For so long as such a control termination event does not exist, the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer may be replaced without cause at the direction of the applicable outside controlling class representative subject to certain conditions described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations—The Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination—Special Servicer Appointment Rights” in this prospectus supplement. The WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer may also resign under the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement in certain circumstances.

The WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer, the WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer, the WFCM 2015-C30 Certificate Administrator, the WFCM 2015-C30 Trustee, the WFCM 2015-C30 Operating Advisor, the WFCM 2015-C30 depositor and various related persons and entities will be entitled to be indemnified by the Issuing Entity for certain losses and liabilities incurred by such party in accordance with the terms and conditions of the related Co-Lender Agreement.

See also “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations—The Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination” in this prospectus supplement.

Prospective investors are encouraged to review the full provisions of the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement, which is available online at www.sec.gov or by requesting a copy from the underwriters.

Use of Proceeds

The Depositor expects to receive from this offering approximately 106.8% of the aggregate principal balance of the Offered Certificates, plus accrued interest from September 1, 2015, before deducting expenses payable by the Depositor. The net proceeds from the sale of the Offered Certificates will be used by the Depositor to pay the purchase price for the Mortgage Loans and to pay certain other related expenses.

S-347

Material Federal Income Tax Consequences

General

The following is a general discussion of the anticipated material federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Offered Certificates. The discussion below does not purport to address all federal income tax consequences that may be applicable to particular categories of investors (such as banks, insurance companies, securities dealers, foreign persons, tax exempt investors, investors whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, U.S. expatriates, and investors that hold the Offered Certificates as part of a “straddle,” integrated transaction or “conversion transaction”), some of which may be subject to special rules. The authorities on which this discussion is based are subject to change or differing interpretations, and any such change or interpretation could apply retroactively. This discussion reflects the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), as well as regulations promulgated by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Investors should consult their own tax advisors in determining the federal, state, local and any other tax consequences to them of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Offered Certificates and should review the discussions under the heading “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences” in the prospectus.

Two (2) separate real estate mortgage investment conduit (“REMIC”) elections will be made with respect to designated portions of the Issuing Entity (the “Lower-Tier REMIC” and the “Upper-Tier REMIC,” respectively). The Lower-Tier REMIC and the Upper-Tier REMIC are referred to collectively as the “Trust REMICs”. The Lower-Tier REMIC will hold the Mortgage Loans (exclusive of any Excess Interest), the proceeds of the Mortgage Loans and any foreclosure property (including the Issuing Entity’s interest in any real property acquired in respect of the Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans) that secures the Mortgage Loans, and will issue certain uncertificated classes of regular interests (the “Lower-Tier Regular Interests”) to the Upper-Tier REMIC and a residual interest, represented by the Class R Certificates, as the sole class of residual interests in the Lower-Tier REMIC. The Upper-Tier REMIC will hold the Lower-Tier Regular Interests and proceeds of the Lower-Tier Regular Interests and will issue the Regular Certificates and the Trust Components as classes of regular interests in the Upper-Tier REMIC and a residual interest, represented by the Class R Certificates, as the sole class of residual interests in the Upper-Tier REMIC.

Qualification as a REMIC requires ongoing compliance with certain conditions. On the Closing Date, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, special counsel to the Depositor, will deliver its opinion that, assuming (1) the making of appropriate elections, (2) compliance with the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, each Outside Servicing Agreement and each Co-Lender Agreement, (3) the continued qualification of each REMIC formed under each Outside Servicing Agreement, and (4) compliance with applicable changes in the Code, including the REMIC provisions of the Code, for federal income tax purposes (a) the Lower-Tier REMIC and the Upper-Tier REMIC will each qualify as a REMIC, (b) the Regular Certificates and the Trust Components will evidence ownership of the “regular interests” in the Upper-Tier REMIC, (c) the Lower-Tier Regular Interests will evidence the “regular interests” in the Lower-Tier REMIC, and (d) the Class R Certificates will represent ownership of the sole class of “residual interests” in each of the Lower-Tier REMIC and the Upper-Tier REMIC within the meaning of the REMIC provisions of the Code.

In addition, in the opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, (i) the portions of the Issuing Entity consisting of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Trust Components (and related amounts in the Exchangeable Distribution Account) will be treated as a grantor trust for federal income tax purposes under subpart E, part I of subchapter J of the Code (a “Grantor Trust”), (ii) the Class A-S Certificates will represent undivided beneficial interests in the Class A-S Percentage Interest of the Class A-S Trust Component, the Class B Certificates will represent undivided beneficial interests in the Class B Percentage Interest of the Class B Trust Component, the Class C Certificates will represent undivided beneficial interests in the Class C Percentage Interest of the Class C Trust Component and, in each case, related amounts in the Exchangeable Distribution Account, and (iii) the Class PEZ Certificates will represent undivided beneficial interests in the Class A-S-PEZ Percentage Interest, the Class B-PEZ Percentage Interest and the Class C-PEZ Percentage Interest of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Trust Components, respectively, and related amounts in the Exchangeable Distribution Account.

Tax Status of Offered Certificates

Except as provided below, the Offered Certificates will be treated as “real estate assets” within the meaning of Code Section 856(c)(5)(B), and interest (including OID, if any) on the Offered Certificates will be interest described in Code Section 856(c)(3)(B) in the same proportion that, for both purposes, the assets of the Trust

S-348

REMICs would be so treated. For purposes of the foregoing tests, the Trust REMICs are treated as a single REMIC. If at all times 95% or more of the assets of the Trust REMICs qualify for each of the foregoing treatments, the Offered Certificates will qualify for the corresponding status in their entirety. For purposes of Code Section 856(c)(5)(B), payments of principal and interest on Mortgage Loans that are reinvested pending distribution to holders of Regular Certificates qualify for such treatment. The Offered Certificates will be treated as assets described in Code Section 7701(a)(19)(C)(xi) to the extent that the Mortgage Loans are treated as “loans . . . secured by an interest in real property which is . . . residential real property” or “loans secured by an interest in educational, health, or welfare institutions or facilities, including structures designed or used primarily for residential purposes for students, residents, and persons under care, employees, or members of the staff of such institutions or facilities” within the meaning of Code Section 7701(a)(19)(C) (such as certain multifamily dwellings, but not other commercial properties), and otherwise will not qualify for this treatment. Holders of the Offered Certificates should consult their own tax advisors regarding the extent to which their Certificates will qualify for this treatment. Mortgage Loans that have been defeased with U.S. Treasury obligations will not qualify for the foregoing treatments. Offered Certificates held by certain financial institutions will constitute an “evidence of indebtedness” within the meaning of Code Section 582(c)(1). Moreover, the Offered Certificates will be “qualified mortgages” for another REMIC within the meaning of Code Section 860G(a)(3) if transferred to that REMIC within a prescribed time period in exchange for regular or residual interests in that REMIC. See “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—REMICs” in the prospectus.

Taxation of the Offered Regular Certificates and the Trust Components

General

Because they represent regular interests, each Class of Offered Regular Certificates and the Trust Components represented by the Exchangeable Certificates generally will be treated as newly originated debt instruments for federal income tax purposes. Holders of the Classes of Offered Certificates will be required to include in income all interest on the regular interests represented by their Certificates in accordance with the accrual method of accounting, regardless of a Certificateholder’s usual method of accounting. For purposes of the following discussion, the treatment described below applies to a Class PEZ Certificateholder’s interest in the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Trust Components and also applies to a Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificateholder’s interest in the related Trust Component. See “—Taxation of the Exchangeable Certificates” in this prospectus supplement.

Original Issue Discount

Holders of Offered Certificates issued with original issue discount generally must include original issue discount in ordinary income for federal income tax purposes as it accrues in accordance with the constant yield method, which takes into account the compounding of interest, in advance of receipt of the cash attributable to such income. The following discussion is based in part on temporary and final Treasury regulations (the “OID Regulations”) under Code Sections 1271 through 1273 and 1275 and in part on the provisions of the conference committee report to the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Holders of Offered Certificates should be aware, however, that the OID Regulations do not adequately address certain issues relevant to prepayable securities, such as the Offered Regular Certificates and the Trust Components represented by the Exchangeable Certificates. Investors are advised to consult their own tax advisors as to the discussions in this prospectus supplement and the prospectus and the appropriate method for reporting interest and original issue discount with respect to the Offered Certificates. See “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Original Issue Discount” in the prospectus.

Each Class of Offered Certificates (other than the Exchangeable Certificates) and the Trust Components represented by the Exchangeable Certificates will be treated as a single installment obligation for purposes of determining the original issue discount includible in an Offered Certificateholder’s income. The total amount of original issue discount on an Offered Certificate (other than the Exchangeable Certificates) or a Trust Component represented by an Exchangeable Certificate is the excess of the “stated redemption price at maturity” of the Offered Regular Certificate or Trust Component over its “issue price.” The issue price of a class of Offered Regular Certificates or Trust Components is the first price at which a substantial amount of Offered Regular Certificates or Trust Components represented by Exchangeable Certificates of such class is sold to investors (excluding bond houses, brokers and underwriters). Although unclear under the OID Regulations, the Certificate Administrator will treat the issue price of Offered Regular Certificates or Trust Components represented by Exchangeable Certificates as to which there is no substantial sale as of the issue date as the fair market value of

S-349

such class as of the issue date. The issue price of the Offered Regular Certificates or Trust Components represented by Exchangeable Certificates also includes the amount paid by an initial Certificateholder of such class for accrued interest that relates to a period prior to the issue date of such class of Offered Regular Certificates or Trust Components. The stated redemption price at maturity of an Offered Regular Certificate or Trust Component is the sum of all payments provided by the debt instrument other than any qualified stated interest payments. Under the OID Regulations, qualified stated interest generally means interest payable at a single fixed rate or a qualified variable rate; provided that such interest payments are unconditionally payable at intervals of one year or less during the entire term of the obligation. Because there is no penalty or default remedy in the case of nonpayment of interest with respect to an Offered Regular Certificate or Trust Component represented by an Exchangeable Certificate, it is possible that no interest on any class of Offered Regular Certificates or Trust Component represented by an Exchangeable Certificate will be treated as qualified stated interest. However, because the Mortgage Loans provide for remedies in the event of default, the Certificate Administrator will treat all payments of stated interest on the Offered Regular Certificates (other than the Class X-A and Class X-D Certificates) and Trust Components represented by Exchangeable Certificates as qualified stated interest (other than accrued interest distributed on the first Distribution Date for the number of days that exceed the interval between the Closing Date and the first Distribution Date). Based on the foregoing, it is anticipated that the Class C Trust Component and the Class D Certificates will be issued with original issue discount.

In addition, it is anticipated that the Certificate Administrator will treat the Class X-A and Class X-D Certificates as having no qualified stated interest. Accordingly, each such Class will be considered to be issued with original issue discount in an amount equal to the excess of all distributions of interest expected to be received thereon over its issue price (including interest accrued prior to the Closing Date). Any “negative” amounts of original issue discount on such Class attributable to rapid prepayments with respect to the Mortgage Loans will not be deductible currently. The holder of a Class X-A or Class X-D Certificate may be entitled to a loss deduction, which may be a capital loss, to the extent it becomes certain that such Certificateholder will not recover a portion of its basis in such Class, assuming no further prepayments. In the alternative, it is possible that rules similar to the “noncontingent bond method” of the contingent interest rules of the OID regulations may be promulgated with respect to such Classes. Unless and until required otherwise by applicable authority, it is not anticipated that the contingent interest rules will apply.

For the purposes of accruing original issue discount, if any, determining whether such original issue discount is de minimis and amortizing any premium, the prepayment assumption will be 0% CPR; provided, that it is assumed that any ARD Loan will prepay in full on its Anticipated Repayment Date (the “Prepayment Assumption”). See “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Original Issue Discount” in the prospectus.

Premium

An Offered Regular Certificate or Trust Component represented by an Exchangeable Certificate purchased upon initial issuance or in the secondary market at a cost greater than its remaining stated redemption price at maturity generally is considered to be purchased at a premium. See “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Premium” in the prospectus. It is anticipated that the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB Certificates and the Class A-S and Class B Trust Components will be issued at a premium.

Prepayment Premiums and Yield Maintenance Charges

Prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges actually collected will be distributed among the holders of the respective classes of Certificates and Trust Components as described under “Description of the Offered Certificates—Distributions—Prepayment Premiums” in this prospectus supplement. It is not entirely clear under the Code when the amount of prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges so allocated should be taxed to the holder of an Offered Certificate, but it is not expected, for federal income tax reporting purposes, that prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges will be treated as giving rise to any income to the holder of an Offered Certificate prior to the Master Servicer’s actual receipt of a prepayment premium or yield maintenance charge. Prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges, if any, may be treated as ordinary income, although authority exists for treating such amounts as capital gain if they are treated as paid upon the retirement or partial retirement of a Certificate. Certificateholders should consult their own tax advisers concerning the treatment of prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges.

S-350

Taxation of the Exchangeable Certificates

The portion of the Issuing Entity comprised of the Trust Components will be classified as part of a Grantor Trust, and each Exchangeable Certificate (other than any Class PEZ Certificate) will represent an undivided, proportionate beneficial interest in the Trust Component underlying that Exchangeable Certificate (such as the Class A-S Trust Component in the case of a Class A-S Certificate, the Class B Trust Component in the case of a Class B Certificate and the Class C Trust Component in the case of a Class C Certificate). Each Exchangeable Certificate (other than any Class PEZ Certificate) will therefore represent a beneficial ownership interest in a regular interest issued by the Upper-Tier REMIC and the income tax consequences to the holder of an Exchangeable Certificate (other than any Class PEZ Certificate) with respect to the underlying Trust Component, will be the same as the income tax consequences to a holder of an Offered Regular Certificate, as described in this prospectus supplement.

The Class PEZ Certificates will represent beneficial ownership interests in all of the Trust Components, but each Trust Component will be taxable as a separate regular interest for federal income tax purposes, and the holder of a Class PEZ Certificate must account separately for its interest in each Trust Component. The income tax consequences of holding a Class PEZ Certificate with respect to each of the three Trust Components will therefore be the same as the income tax consequences to the holder of three separate and individual Offered Regular Certificates, as described in this prospectus supplement. See “—Taxation of the Offered Regular Certificates and the Trust Components” above. A purchaser must allocate its basis in the Class PEZ Certificates among the interests in each Trust Component in accordance with their relative fair market values as of the time of acquisition. Similarly, on the sale of such Class PEZ Certificate, the holder of such Class PEZ Certificate must allocate the amount received on the sale among the interests in each Trust Component in accordance with their relative fair market values as of the time of sale. Prospective beneficial owners of the Class PEZ Certificates should consult their tax advisors as to the appropriate method of accounting for their interest in the Class PEZ Certificates.

The exchange of the requisite proportions of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates for the Class PEZ Certificates, and the exchange of the Class PEZ Certificates for the requisite proportions of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C Certificates will not be taxable.

For further information regarding federal income tax reporting requirements relating to the Grantor Trust, see “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—Grantor Trusts—Grantor Trust Reporting” and “—Backup Withholding” in the prospectus.

Further Information

For further information regarding the federal income tax consequences of investing in the Offered Certificates, including consequences of purchase, ownership and disposition of Offered Certificates by any person who is not a citizen or resident of the United States, a corporation or partnership or other entity created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state or the District of Columbia, or is a foreign estate or trust, see “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—REMICs” and “—Taxation of Classes of Exchangeable Certificates” in the prospectus.

DUE TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THESE RULES AND THE CURRENT UNCERTAINTY AS TO THE MANNER OF THEIR APPLICATION TO THE ISSUING ENTITY AND CERTIFICATEHOLDERS, IT IS PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT THAT POTENTIAL INVESTORS CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS REGARDING THE TAX TREATMENT OF THEIR ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF THE OFFERED CERTIFICATES.

State and Other Tax Considerations

In addition to the federal income tax consequences described in “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences” in this prospectus supplement, potential investors should consider the state, local and other tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of the Offered Certificates. State, local and other tax law may differ substantially from the corresponding federal tax law, and this discussion does not purport to describe any aspect of the income tax laws of any state or locality or other jurisdiction. Therefore, potential investors should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the various tax consequences of investments in the Offered Certificates.

S-351

ERISA Considerations

An investor who is—

· a fiduciary of a plan subject to ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code (collectively, “Plans”), or

· any other person investing “plan assets” of any Plan,

is encouraged to carefully review with their legal advisors whether the purchase or holding of an Offered Certificate would be a “prohibited transaction” or would otherwise be impermissible under ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code. See “ERISA Considerations” in the prospectus.

If a Plan acquires an Offered Certificate, the underlying assets of the trust fund will be deemed for purposes of ERISA to be assets of the investing Plan, unless certain exceptions apply. See “ERISA Considerations—Plan Asset Regulations” in the prospectus. However, we cannot predict in advance, nor can there be any continuing assurance, whether those exceptions may be applicable because of the factual nature of the rules set forth in the plan asset regulations under U.S. Department of Labor Reg. Section 2510.3-101, as modified by Section 3(42) of ERISA (the “Plan Asset Regulations”). For example, one of the exceptions in the Plan Asset Regulations states that the underlying assets of an entity will not be considered “plan assets” if less than 25% of the value of each class of equity interests is held by “benefit plan investors,” which include Plans and entities whose underlying assets include plan assets by reason of a Plan’s investment in such entity, but this exception will be tested immediately after each acquisition of an Offered Certificate, whether upon initial issuance or in the secondary market. Because there are no relevant restrictions on the purchase and transfer of the Offered Certificates by Plans, it cannot be assured that benefit plan investors will own less than 25% of each class of the Offered Certificates.

If one of the exceptions in the Plan Asset Regulations applies, the prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code will not apply to transactions involving the issuing entity’s underlying assets. However, if any of the managers or co-managers, the mortgagors, the trustee, the servicers or other parties providing services to the issuing entity is a party in interest or a disqualified person with respect to the Plan, the acquisition or holding of Offered Certificates by that Plan could result in a prohibited transaction, unless the Underwriter Exemption, as discussed below, or some other exemption is available.

The U.S. Department of Labor issued an individual prohibited transaction exemption to a predecessor of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Prohibited Transaction Exemption (“PTE”) 91-23 (April 18, 1991), and a substantially identical prohibited transaction exemption to Goldman, Sachs & Co., PTE 89-88 (October 17, 1989), both as amended by PTE 2013-08 (July 9, 2013) (collectively, the “Underwriter Exemption”). Subject to the satisfaction of conditions set forth in the Underwriter Exemption, it generally exempts from the application of the prohibited transaction provisions of Sections 406(a) and 407(a) of ERISA, and the excise taxes imposed on these prohibited transactions under Sections 4975(a) and (b) of the Internal Revenue Code, specified transactions relating to, among other things—

· the servicing and operation of pools of real estate loans, such as the mortgage pool, and

· the purchase, sale and holding of mortgage pass-through certificates, such as the Offered Certificates, that are underwritten by an underwriter under the Underwriter Exemption.

The Underwriter Exemption sets forth five general conditions which, among others, must be satisfied for a transaction involving the purchase, sale and holding of an Offered Certificate to be eligible for exemptive relief under the exemption. The conditions are as follows:

· first, the acquisition of the certificate by a Plan must be on terms that are at least as favorable to the Plan as they would be in an arm’s-length transaction with an unrelated party;

· second, at the time of its acquisition by the Plan, the certificate must be rated in one of the four highest generic rating categories by at least one NRSRO that meets the requirements in the Underwriter Exemption (“Exemption Rating Agency”);

S-352

· third, the trustee cannot be an affiliate of any other member of the Restricted Group (other than an underwriter);

· fourth, the following must be true—

1. the sum of all payments made to and retained by the underwriters must represent not more than reasonable compensation for underwriting the relevant class of certificates,

2. the sum of all payments made to and retained by us in connection with the assignment of mortgage loans to the Issuing Entity must represent not more than the fair market value of the obligations, and

3. the sum of all payments made to and retained by the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer or any sub-servicer must represent not more than reasonable compensation for that person’s services under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and reimbursement of that person’s reasonable expenses in connection therewith; and

· fifth, the investing Plan must be an accredited investor as defined in Rule 501(a)(1) of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

It is a condition to the issuance of the Offered Certificates that they receive the ratings as required by the Underwriter Exemption, and we believe that each of the Ratings Agencies meets the requirements to be an Exemption Rating Agency; consequently, the second general condition set forth above will be satisfied with respect to the Offered Certificates as of the Closing Date. In addition, the third general condition set forth above will be satisfied with respect to the Offered Certificates as of the Closing Date. We believe that the fourth general condition will be satisfied with respect to the Offered Certificates. A fiduciary of a Plan contemplating purchasing any of the Offered Certificates, whether in the initial issuance of the Offered Certificates or in the secondary market, must make its own determination that the first and fifth conditions set forth above will be satisfied with respect to such Certificates. A fiduciary of a Plan contemplating purchasing any of the Offered Certificates in the secondary market must make its own determination that at the time of such acquisition, such Certificates continue to satisfy the second general condition set forth above.

“Restricted Group” means, collectively, the following persons and entities: the trustee; the underwriters; the Depositor; the Master Servicer; the Special Servicer; any sub-servicers; the Sponsors; each borrower, if any, with respect to Mortgage Loans constituting more than 5% of the total unamortized principal balance of the mortgage pool as of the date of initial issuance of the Offered Certificates; and any and all affiliates of any of the aforementioned persons.

In order to meet the requirements to be an Exemption Rating Agency, the credit rating agency:

1. Must be recognized by the SEC as a NRSRO,

2. Must have indicated on its most recently filed SEC Form NRSRO that it rates “issuers of asset-backed securities,” and

3. Must have had, within the 12 months prior to the initial issuance of the securities, at least 3 “qualified ratings engagements” which are defined as (A) a rating engagement requested by an issuer or underwriter in connection with the initial offering of the securities, (B) which is made public to investors generally and (C) for which the rating agency is compensated, and (D) which involves the offering of securities of the type that would be granted relief under the Exemption.

The Underwriter Exemption also requires that the Issuing Entity meet the following requirements:

· the trust fund must consist solely of assets of the type that have been included in other investment pools;

· certificates evidencing interests in those other investment pools must have been rated in one of the four highest generic categories by at least one Exemption Rating Agency; and

S-353

· certificates evidencing interests in those other investment pools must have been purchased by investors other than Plans for at least one year prior to any Plan’s acquisition of an Offered Certificate.

The Depositor expects that the conditions to the applicability of the Underwriter Exemption described above generally will be met with respect to the Offered Certificates, other than those conditions which are dependent on facts unknown to the Depositor or which it cannot control, such as those relating to the circumstances of the Plan purchaser or the Plan fiduciary making the decision to purchase Offered Certificates.

Under the Underwriter Exemption, the loan-to-value ratio of any underlying mortgage loan held in the trust may not exceed 100% at the date of initial issuance of the Offered Certificates, based on the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan and the fair market value of the mortgaged real property as of the Closing Date. It is possible that, if the fair market value of any of the Mortgage Loans has declined since origination, this requirement may not be satisfied. This possibility is greater for the seasoned loans than it is for the other Mortgage Loans.

If the general conditions of the Underwriter Exemption are satisfied, it may provide an exemption from the restrictions imposed by Sections 406(a) and 407(a) of ERISA, as well as the excise taxes imposed by Sections 4975(a) and (b) of the Internal Revenue Code by reason of Sections 4975(c)(1)(A) through (D) of the Code, in connection with—

· the direct or indirect sale, exchange or transfer of an Offered Certificate acquired by a Plan upon initial issuance from us when we are, or a mortgage loan seller, the Trustee, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, any sub-servicer, any provider of credit support, underwriter or borrower is, a Party in Interest with respect to the investing Plan,

· the direct or indirect acquisition or disposition in the secondary market of an Offered Certificate by a Plan, and

· the continued holding of an Offered Certificate by a Plan.

However, no exemption is provided from the restrictions of Sections 406(a)(1)(E), 406(a)(2) and 407 of ERISA for the acquisition or holding of an Offered Certificate on behalf of a Plan sponsored by any member of the Restricted Group, if such acquisition or holding is by any person who has discretionary authority or renders investment advice with respect to the assets of that Plan.

If the specific conditions of the Underwriter Exemption set forth below are also satisfied, the Underwriter Exemption may provide an additional exemption from the restrictions imposed by Sections 406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of ERISA, and the excise taxes imposed by Sections 4975(a) and (b) of the Code by reason of Section 4975(c)(1)(E) of the Code, in connection with:

· the direct or indirect sale, exchange or transfer of Offered Certificates in the initial issuance of securities between the issuing entity or an underwriter and a Plan when the person who has discretionary authority or renders investment advice with respect to the investment of Plan assets in the securities is: (1) a borrower with respect to 5% or less of the fair market value of the issuing entity’s assets or (2) an affiliate of such a person, provided that: (a) the Plan is not sponsored by a member of the Restricted Group; (b) the Plan’s investment in each class of certificates does not exceed 25% of the outstanding securities of such class; (c) after the Plan’s acquisition of the certificates, no more than 25% of the assets over which the fiduciary has investment authority are invested in securities of the issuing entity containing assets which are sold or serviced by the same entity; and (d) in the case of initial issuance (but not secondary market transactions), at least 50% of each class of certificates and at least 50% of the aggregate interests in the issuing entity are acquired by persons independent of the Restricted Group;

· the direct or indirect acquisition or disposition in the secondary market of Offered Certificates by a Plan or with Plan assets provided that the conditions in clauses (2)(a), (b) and (c) of the prior bullet are met; and

S-354

· the continued holding of Offered Certificates acquired by a Plan or with Plan assets in an initial issuance or secondary market transaction meeting the foregoing requirements.

We cannot assure you that all of the conditions for this additional exemption will be met. In particular, during periods of adverse conditions in the market for CMBS, there is an increased likelihood that (i) 50% or more of one or more classes of Offered Certificates will be sold in the initial issuance to members of the Restricted Group and (ii) 50% or more of the aggregate interest in the issuing entity will be acquired by members of the Restricted Group. Plans with respect to which a borrower or an affiliate of a borrower have investment discretion are advised to consult with counsel before acquiring any Offered Certificates.

Further, if the general conditions of the Underwriter Exemption, as well as other conditions set forth in the Underwriter Exemption are satisfied, it may provide an exemption from the restrictions imposed by Sections 406(a), 406(b) and 407(a) of ERISA, and the taxes imposed by Sections 4975(a) and (b) of the Code by reason of Section 4975(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, for transactions in connection with the servicing, management and operation of the trust fund.

Lastly, if the general conditions of the Underwriter Exemption are satisfied, it may also provide an exemption from the restrictions imposed by Sections 406(a) and 407(a) of ERISA, and the taxes imposed by Sections 4975(a) and (b) of the Code, by reason of Sections 4975(c)(1)(A) through (D) of the Code, if the restrictions are deemed to otherwise apply merely because a person is deemed to be a party in interest or a disqualified person with respect to an investing plan by virtue of—

· providing services to the Plan,

· having a specified relationship to this person, or

· solely as a result of the Plan’s ownership of Offered Certificates.

Before purchasing an Offered Certificate, a fiduciary of a Plan should itself confirm that the general and other conditions set forth in the Underwriter Exemption, and the other requirements set forth in the Underwriter Exemption, would be satisfied at the time of the purchase.

Exempt Plans

A governmental plan as defined in Section 3(32) of ERISA is not subject to ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code. However, a governmental plan may be subject to a federal, state or local law which is, to a material extent, similar to the fiduciary or prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA or the Code (“Similar Law”). A fiduciary of a governmental plan should make its own determination as to the need for and the availability of any exemptive relief under any Similar Law.

Further Warnings

The fiduciary of a Plan should consider that the rating of a security may change. If the rating of an Offered Certificate declines below the lowest permitted rating, the Offered Certificate will no longer be eligible for relief under the Underwriter Exemption (although a Plan that had purchased the Offered Certificate when it had a permitted investment grade rating would not be required by the Underwriter Exemption to dispose of the Offered Certificate). If the Offered Certificate meets the requirements of the Underwriter Exemption, other than those relating to rating, such Offered Certificate may be eligible to be purchased by an insurance company general account pursuant to Sections I and III of Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption (or PTCE) 95-60.

Each beneficial owner of an Offered Certificate or any interest therein will be deemed to have represented, by virtue of its acquisition or holding of such Offered Certificate or interest therein, that either (i) it is not a Plan or an entity using assets of a Plan, (ii) it has acquired and is holding the Offered Certificates in reliance on the Underwriter Exemption, and that it understands that there are certain conditions to the availability of the Underwriter Exemption, including that the Offered Certificates must be rated, at the time of purchase, not lower than “BBB-” (or its equivalent) by an Exemption Rating Agency and that such Offered Certificate is so rated or (iii)(1) it is an insurance company, (2) the source of funds used to acquire or hold the certificate or interest therein

S-355

is an “insurance company general account,” as such term is defined in PTCE 95-60 and (3) the conditions in Sections I and III of PTCE 95-60 have been satisfied.

Any fiduciary of a Plan considering whether to purchase an Offered Certificate on behalf of that Plan is encouraged to consult with its counsel regarding the applicability of the fiduciary responsibility and prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA and the Code to the investment, in particular the fiduciary of a Plan should consider whether the purchase of an Offered Certificate satisfies the ERISA restrictions concerning prudence and diversification of the investment of the assets of that Plan.

The sale of Offered Certificates to a Plan is in no way a representation or warranty by us or any of the underwriters that—

· the investment meets all relevant legal requirements with respect to investments by Plans generally or by any particular Plan, or

· the investment is appropriate for Plans generally or for any particular Plan.

Legal Investment

No Class of Offered Certificates will constitute “mortgage related securities” for purposes of the Secondary Mortgage Market Enhancement Act of 1984, as amended. The appropriate characterization of the Offered Certificates under various legal investment restrictions, and thus the ability of investors subject to these restrictions to purchase the Offered Certificates, is subject to significant interpretative uncertainties. No representations are made as to the proper characterization of the Offered Certificates for legal investment, financial institution regulatory, or other purposes, or as to the ability of particular investors to purchase the Offered Certificates under applicable legal investment restrictions. Further, any ratings downgrade of any Class of Offered Certificates by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization, as defined in Section 3(a)(62) of the Exchange Act (“NRSRO”) to less than an “investment grade” rating (i.e., lower than the top four rating categories) may adversely affect the ability of an investor to purchase or retain, or otherwise impact the regulatory characteristics of, that Class. The uncertainties described above (and any unfavorable future determinations concerning the legal investment or financial institution regulatory characteristics of the Offered Certificates) may adversely affect the liquidity and market value of the Offered Certificates. Accordingly, all investors whose investment activities are subject to legal investment laws and regulations, regulatory capital requirements, or review by regulatory authorities should consult with their own legal advisors in determining whether and to what extent the Offered Certificates will constitute legal investments for them or are subject to investment, capital or other regulatory restrictions. See “Legal Investment” in the prospectus.

The Issuing Entity will be relying on an exclusion or exemption under the Investment Company Act contained in Section 3(c)(5) of the Investment Company Act or Rule 3a-7 under the Investment Company Act, although there may be additional exclusions or exemptions available to the Issuing Entity. The Issuing Entity is being structured so as not to constitute a “covered fund” for purposes of the Volcker Rule under the Dodd-Frank Act. The Volcker Rule generally prohibits “banking entities” (which is broadly defined to include U.S. banks and bank holding companies and many non-U.S. banking entities, together with their respective subsidiaries and other affiliates) from (i) engaging in proprietary trading, (ii) acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in or sponsoring a “covered fund” and (iii) entering into certain relationships with such funds. Under the Volcker Rule, unless otherwise jointly determined by specified federal regulators, a “covered fund” does not include an issuer that may rely on an exclusion or exemption from the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act other than the exclusions contained in Section 3(c)(1) and Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. The Volcker Rule became effective on July 21, 2012, and final regulations implementing the Volcker Rule were adopted on December 10, 2013 and became effective on April 1, 2014, with conformance required by July 21, 2015 (or by July 21, 2016 in respect of investments in and relationships with covered funds that were in place prior to December 31, 2013, with the possibility of a further one-year extension). Although prior to the deadlines for conformance, banking entities were or are required to make good-faith efforts to conform their activities and investments to the Volcker Rule, the general effects of the Volcker Rule remain uncertain. Any prospective investor in the Offered Certificates, including a U.S. or foreign bank or a subsidiary or other affiliate thereof, should consult its own legal advisors regarding such matters and other effects of the Volcker Rule.

S-356

Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans

The following discussion contains a summary of certain legal aspects of the Mortgage Loans with respect to the Mortgaged Properties located in Illinois and California, and representing approximately 16.8% and 14.0%, respectively, of the Initial Pool Balance by allocated loan amount, which are general in nature. The summaries do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the applicable federal and state laws governing the related Mortgage Loans.

Mortgage loans in Illinois are generally secured by mortgages on the related real estate. Foreclosure of a mortgage in Illinois is accomplished by judicial foreclosure. There is no power of sale in Illinois. After an action for foreclosure is commenced and the lender secures a judgment, the judgment of foreclosure will provide that the property be sold at a sale in accordance with Article 15 of the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law (Article 15 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure) on such terms and conditions as specified by the court on the judgment of foreclosure if the full amount of the judgment is not paid prior to the scheduled sale. A sale may be conducted by any judge, sheriff or private third-party. The notice of sale must set forth, among other things, the time and location of such sale. Generally, the foreclosure sale must occur after the expiration of the applicable reinstatement and redemption periods or waiver thereof. During this period, a notice of sale must be published once a week for three (3) consecutive weeks in the county in which the property is located, the first such notice to be published not more than forty-five (45) days prior to the sale and the last such notice to be published not less than seven (7) days prior to the sale. Illinois does recognize a right of redemption, but such right may be waived by a borrower in the mortgage. Illinois does not have a “one action rule” or “anti-deficiency legislation”. Subsequent to a foreclosure sale, the court conducts a hearing to confirm the sale and enters an order confirming the sale. In the order confirming the sale pursuant to the judgment of foreclosure, the court will enter a personal judgment for deficiency against any party (i) if otherwise authorized and (ii) to the extent requested in the complaint and proven upon presentation of a report of sale and to the extent personally served. In certain circumstances, the lender may have a receiver appointed.

Mortgage loans in California are generally secured by deeds of trust on the related real estate. Foreclosure of a deed of trust in California may be accomplished by a nonjudicial trustee’s sale in accordance with the California Civil Code (so long as it is permitted under a specific provision in the deed of trust) or by judicial foreclosure in accordance with the California Code of Civil Procedure. Public notice of either the trustee’s sale or the judgment of foreclosure is given for a statutory period of time after which the mortgaged real estate may be sold by the trustee, if foreclosed pursuant to the trustee’s power of sale, or by court appointed sheriff under a judicial foreclosure. Following a judicial foreclosure sale, the borrower or its successor in interest may, for a period of up to one year, redeem the property; however, there is no redemption following a trustee’s power of sale. California’s “security first” and “one action” rules require the lender to complete foreclosure of all real estate provided as security under the deed of trust in a single action in an attempt to satisfy the full debt before bringing a personal action (if otherwise permitted) against the borrower for recovery of the debt, except in certain cases involving environmentally impaired real property where foreclosure of the real property is not required before making a claim under the indemnity. California case law has held that acts such as an offset of an unpledged account constitute violations of such statutes. Violations of such statutes may result in the loss of some or all of the security under the mortgage loan and a loss of the ability to sue for the debt. A sale by the trustee under the deed of trust does not constitute an “action” for purposes of the “one action rule”. Other statutory provisions in California limit any deficiency judgment (if otherwise permitted) against the borrower following a judicial foreclosure to the amount by which the indebtedness exceeds the fair value at the time of the public sale and in no event greater than the difference between the foreclosure sale price and the amount of the indebtedness. Further, under California law, once a property has been sold pursuant to a power of sale clause contained in a deed of trust (and in the case of certain types of purchase money acquisition financings, under all circumstances), the lender is precluded from seeking a deficiency judgment from the borrower or, under certain circumstances, guarantors. On the other hand, under certain circumstances, California law permits separate and even contemporaneous actions against both the borrower and any guarantors. California statutory provisions regarding assignments of rents and leases require that a lender whose loan is secured by such an assignment must exercise a remedy with respect to rents as authorized by statute in order to establish its right to receive the rents after an event of default. Among the remedies authorized by statute is the lender’s right to have a receiver appointed under certain circumstances.

Other Aspects. See the discussion under “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans” in the prospectus regarding other legal aspects of the Mortgage Loans that you should consider prior to making any investment in the Certificates.

S-357

Ratings

It is a condition to the issuance of each Class of Offered Certificates that it receives an investment grade credit rating from one or more NRSROs engaged by the Depositor to rate the Offered Certificates (each such NRSRO engaged by the Depositor to rate the Offered Certificates, a “Rating Agency” and, collectively, the “Rating Agencies”).

We are not obligated to maintain any particular rating with respect to any class of Offered Certificates. Changes affecting the Mortgage Loans, the Mortgaged Properties, the Sponsors, the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee, the Operating Advisor, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, any Outside Servicer, any Outside Special Servicer or another person may have an adverse effect on the ratings of the Offered Certificates, and thus on the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of the Offered Certificates, although such adverse changes would not necessarily be an event of default under the applicable Mortgage Loan.

A securities rating on mortgage pass-through certificates addresses credit risk and the likelihood of full and timely payment to the applicable certificateholders of all distributions of interest at the applicable pass-through rate on the certificates in question on each distribution date and, except in the case of interest-only certificates, the ultimate payment in full of the certificate principal amount of each class of certificates in question on a date that is not later than the rated final distribution date with respect to such class of certificates. A rating takes into consideration, among other things, the credit quality of the related pool of mortgage loans, structural and legal aspects associated with the certificates in question, and the extent to which the payment stream from the related pool of mortgage loans is adequate to make payments required under the certificates in question. A securities rating on mortgage pass-through certificates does not, however, constitute a statement regarding the likelihood, timing or frequency of prepayments (whether voluntary or involuntary) on the related mortgage loans or the degree to which the payments might differ from those originally contemplated. In addition, a rating does not address the likelihood, timing or frequency of voluntary or mandatory prepayments of the related mortgage loans, the tax attributes of the certificates in question or of the related issuing entity, the allocation of prepayment interest shortfalls or whether any compensating interest payments will be made, or the likelihood or frequency of yield maintenance charges, assumption fees, modification fees or penalty charges. See “Risk Factors—Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations May Assign Different Ratings to the Certificates; Ratings of the Certificates Reflect Only the Views of the Applicable Rating Agencies as of the Dates Such Ratings Were Issued; Ratings May Affect ERISA Eligibility; Ratings May Be Downgraded” in this prospectus supplement.

In addition, a securities rating on mortgage pass-through certificates does not represent an assessment of the yield to maturity that investors may experience or the possibility that the holders of interest-only certificates might not fully recover their initial investments in the event of delinquencies or defaults or rapid prepayments on the underlying mortgage loans (including both voluntary and involuntary prepayments) or the application of any realized losses. In the event that the holders of such certificates do not fully recover their investment as a result of rapid principal prepayments on the Mortgage Loans, all amounts “due” to such holders will nevertheless have been paid, and such result is consistent with the securities ratings assigned to such certificates. The Notional Amount of the Class X-A Certificates may be reduced by the allocation of realized losses and prepayments, whether voluntary or involuntary, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and/or Class A-AB Certificates and/or the Class A-S Trust Component. The Notional Amount of the Class X-D Certificates may be reduced by the allocation of realized losses and prepayments, whether voluntary or involuntary, to the Class D Certificates. The securities ratings do not address the timing or magnitude of reductions of such Notional Amount, but only the obligation to distribute interest timely on each such Notional Amount as so reduced from time to time. Therefore, the securities ratings of the Class X-A and Class X-D Certificates should be evaluated independently from similar ratings on other types of securities.

NRSROs that were not engaged by the Depositor to rate the Offered Certificates may nevertheless issue unsolicited credit ratings on one or more Classes of Offered Certificates, relying on information they receive pursuant to Rule 17g-5 or otherwise. If any such unsolicited ratings are issued, we cannot assure you that they will not be different from any ratings assigned by the Rating Agencies. The issuance of unsolicited ratings by any NRSRO on a Class of the Offered Certificates that are lower than the ratings assigned by the Rating Agencies may adversely impact the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of that Class.

As part of the process of obtaining ratings for the Offered Certificates, the Depositor had initial discussions with and submitted certain materials to five NRSROs, including the Rating Agencies. Based on preliminary feedback from those NRSROs at that time, the Depositor selected the Rating Agencies to rate the Offered

S-358

Certificates (or, in the case of any particular Rating Agency, certain Classes of the Offered Certificates) and not the other NRSROs, due in part to their initial subordination levels for the various Classes of the Certificates. Had the Depositor selected alternative NRSROs to rate the Offered Certificates, we cannot assure you as to the ratings that such other NRSROs would have ultimately assigned to the Offered Certificates. In the case of one of the Rating Agencies, the Depositor has requested ratings for only certain classes of the Offered Certificates, due in part to the initial subordination levels provided by such Rating Agency for the various classes of the Offered Certificates. If the Depositor had selected such Rating Agency to rate the remaining Classes of Offered Certificates not rated by it, its ratings of such Certificates may have been different, and potentially lower, than those ratings ultimately assigned to such Certificates by the other NRSROs engaged to rate such Certificates. Although unsolicited ratings may be issued by any NRSRO, an NRSRO might be more likely to issue an unsolicited rating if it was not selected after having provided preliminary feedback to the Depositor.

Furthermore, the SEC may determine that any or all of the Rating Agencies no longer qualifies as an NRSRO or is no longer qualified to rate the Offered Certificates, and that determination may also have an adverse effect on the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of the Offered Certificates.

Certain actions provided for in the loan agreements require, as a condition to taking such action, that a Rating Agency Confirmation be obtained from each Rating Agency. In certain circumstances, this condition may be deemed to have been met or waived without such a Rating Agency Confirmation being obtained. See the definition of “Rating Agency Confirmation” in this prospectus supplement. In the event such an action is taken without a Rating Agency Confirmation being obtained, we cannot assure you that the applicable Rating Agency will not downgrade, qualify or withdraw its ratings as a result of the taking of such action. If you invest in the Offered Certificates, pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement your acceptance of Offered Certificates will constitute an acknowledgment and agreement with the procedures relating to Rating Agency Confirmations described under the definition of “Rating Agency Confirmation” in this prospectus supplement.

Any rating of the Offered Certificates should be evaluated independently from similar ratings on other types of securities. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning Rating Agency.

Pursuant to agreements between Depositor and each Rating Agency, the Rating Agencies will provide ongoing ratings surveillance with respect to the Offered Certificates for as long as they remain issued and outstanding. The Depositor is responsible for the fees paid to the Rating Agencies to rate and to provide ongoing rating surveillance with respect to the Offered Certificates.

S-359

Plan of Distribution (Underwriter Conflicts of Interest)

Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., Drexel Hamilton, LLC and the Depositor have entered into an underwriting agreement with respect to the Offered Certificates, pursuant to which the Depositor has agreed to sell to the underwriters, and the underwriters have severally but not jointly agreed to purchase from the Depositor, the respective Certificate Principal Amount or Notional Amount, as applicable, of each class of Offered Certificates set forth below. In connection with the offering contemplated by this prospectus supplement, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. are acting as co-lead managers and joint bookrunners with respect to approximately 46.3% and 53.7%, respectively, of the total principal balance of the Offered Certificates, and Drexel Hamilton, LLC is acting as a co-manager.

Class	Citigroup Global Markets Inc.		Goldman, Sachs & Co.		Drexel Hamilton, LLC
Class A-1	$	14,723,001	$	17,061,999	$	0
Class A-2	$	7,048,605	$	8,168,395	$	0
Class A-3	$	101,905,306	$	118,094,694	$	0
Class A-4	$	153,532,387	$	177,923,613	$	0
Class A-AB	$	33,575,019	$	38,908,981	$	0
Class X-A	$	332,983,000	$	385,883,000	$	0
Class A-S	$	22,198,681	$	25,725,319	$	0
Class B	$	28,858,656	$	33,443,344	$	0
Class PEZ	$	0	$	0	$	0
Class C	$	19,424,078	$	22,509,922	$	0
Class D	$	26,083,590	$	30,227,410	$	0
Class X-D	$	26,083,590	$	30,227,410	$	0

The Depositor estimates that its share of the total expenses of the offering, excluding underwriting discounts and commissions, will be approximately $4,600,000.

The Depositor and the Sponsors have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

The Depositor has been advised by the underwriters that they propose to offer the Offered Certificates to the public from time to time in one or more negotiated transactions, or otherwise, at varying prices to be determined at the time of sale. The underwriters may effect the transactions by selling the Offered Certificates to or through dealers, and the dealers may receive compensation in the form of underwriting discounts, concessions or commissions from the underwriters.

The Offered Certificates are a new issue of securities with no established trading market. The Depositor has been advised by the underwriters that they intend to make a market in the Offered Certificates, but are not obligated to do so and may discontinue market making at any time without notice. No assurance can be given as to the liquidity of the trading market for the Offered Certificates.

We cannot assure you that a secondary market for the Offered Certificates will develop or, if it does develop, that it will continue. The primary source of ongoing information available to investors concerning the Offered Certificates will be the monthly statements discussed under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Reports to Certificateholders; Available Information” in this prospectus supplement, which will include information as to the outstanding principal balance or notional amount, as applicable, of the Offered Certificates and the status of the applicable form of credit enhancement. Except as described under “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Reports to Certificateholders; Available Information” in this prospectus supplement, we cannot assure you that any additional information regarding the Offered Certificates will be available through any other source. In addition, we are not aware of any source through which price information about the Offered Certificates will be generally available on an ongoing basis. The limited nature of that information regarding the Offered Certificates may adversely affect the liquidity of the Offered Certificates, even if a secondary market for the Offered Certificates becomes available.

Citigroup Global Markets Inc., one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of the Depositor, CGMRC (a Sponsor, an Originator and the initial holder of the Illinois Center Companion Loans) and the Certificate Administrator. Goldman, Sachs & Co., one of the underwriters, is an affiliate of GSMC (a Sponsor, an Originator and the initial holder of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Companion Loans) and GS Commercial Real Estate LP (an Originator). See “Risk Factors—Interests and Incentives of the Originators, the Sponsors and Their Affiliates May Not Be

S-360

Aligned with Your Interests” and “—Interests and Incentives of the Underwriter Entities May Not Be Aligned with Your Interests” in this prospectus supplement.

A substantial portion of the net proceeds of this offering (after the payment of underwriting compensation and transaction expenses) is intended to be directed to affiliates of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., one of the underwriters and one of the co-lead managers and joint bookrunners for this offering, and Goldman, Sachs & Co., one of the underwriters and one of the co-lead managers and joint bookrunners for this offering. That flow of funds will occur by means of the collective effect of the payment by the underwriters to the Depositor of the purchase price for the Offered Certificates and (i) the payment by the Depositor to CGMRC, an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., in its capacity as a Sponsor, of the purchase price for the CGMRC Mortgage Loans, and (ii) the payment by the Depositor to GSMC, an affiliate of Goldman, Sachs & Co., in its capacity as a Sponsor, of the purchase price for the GSMC Mortgage Loans. See “Transaction Parties—The Sponsors” in this prospectus supplement. In addition, (i) proceeds received by Rialto in connection with the contribution of the Rialto Mortgage Loans to this securitization transaction will be applied, among other things, to directly or indirectly reacquire any such Mortgage Loans that are financed with, and to make payments to, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, an affiliate of Goldman, Sachs & Co., as the repurchase agreement counterparty; (ii) proceeds received by KGS in connection with the contribution of the KGS Mortgage Loans to this securitization transaction will be applied, among other things, to directly or indirectly reacquire any such Mortgage Loans that are financed with, and to make payments to, Citibank, an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as the repurchase agreement counterparty; and (iii) proceeds received by RAITin connection with the contribution of the RAIT Mortgage Loans to this securitization transaction will be applied, among other things, to directly or indirectly reacquire any such Mortgage Loans that are financed with, and to make payments to, Citibank, an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as the repurchase agreement counterparty.

As a result of the circumstances described above, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. have a “conflict of interest” within the meaning of Rule 5121 of the consolidated rules of The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. In addition, other circumstances exist that result in the underwriters or their affiliates having conflicts of interest, notwithstanding that such circumstances may not constitute a “conflict of interest” within the meaning of such Rule 5121. See “Risk Factors—Interests and Incentives of the Underwriter Entities May Not Be Aligned with Your Interests” in this prospectus supplement.

Legal Matters

The validity of the Offered Certificates and certain federal income tax matters will be passed upon for the Depositor by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, New York. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the underwriters by Mayer Brown LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina.

S-361

INDEX OF CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS

2010 PD Amending Directive	S-9	CGCMT 2015-P1 Servicer	S-163, S-171
AB Loan Combination	S-110	CGCMT 2015-P1 Special Servicer	S-163, S-171
Acceptable Insurance Default	S-289	CGCMT 2015-P1 Trustee	S-163, S-171
Accredited Investor	S-11	CGMRC	S-111, S-185
Actual/360 Basis	S-153	CGMRC Data File	S-186
Administrative Fee Rate	S-223, S-252	CGMRC Mortgage Loans	S-111
ADR	S-112	CGMRC Securitization Database	S-186
Advance Rate	S-292	Citibank	S-220
Advances	S-291	Class	S-244
Allocated Cut-off Date Loan Amount	S-113	Class A-AB Scheduled Principal
Ancillary Fees	S-233	Balance	S-254
Annual Debt Service	S-113	Class A-S Percentage Interest	S-246
Anticipated Repayment Date	S-154	Class A-S Trust Component	S-246
Appraisal Date	S-113	Class A-S-PEZ Percentage Interest	S-246
Appraisal Reduction Amount	S-264	Class B Percentage Interest	S-246
Appraisal Reduction Event	S-263	Class B Trust Component	S-246
Appraised Value	S-113	Class B-PEZ Percentage Interest	S-246
Appraised-Out Class	S-265	Class C Percentage Interest	S-246
Appraiser	S-264	Class C Trust Component	S-246
ARD	S-113	Class C-PEZ Percentage Interest	S-247
ARD Loan	S-154	Class PEZ Component	S-247
Assessment of Compliance	S-300	Class PEZ Component A-S	S-247
Assumption Fees	S-233	Class PEZ Component B	S-247
Atrium Lendco	S-137	Class PEZ Component C	S-247
Atrium LP	S-136	Class X Certificates	S-244
Atrium Preferred Equity	S-136	Class X Strip Rate	S-251
Attestation Report	S-301	Clearstream	S-268
Available Funds	S-249	Clearstream Participants	S-270
Balloon Balance	S-113	Closing Date	S-112
Balloon Mortgage Loans	S-154	CMBS	S-65
Bankruptcy Code	S-66	Code	S-348
Base Interest Fraction	S-257	Co-Lender Agreement	S-164
BEA	S-136	Collection Account	S-295
Beds	S-119	Collection Period	S-250
Borrower Delayed Reimbursements	S-233	Collective Investment Scheme	S-8
Borrower Party	S-323	Commission	S-151
B-Piece Buyers	S-101	Companion Loan	S-110
BTEX	S-136	Companion Loan Holder	S-110
CBE	S-280	Companion Loan Rating Agency	S-304
CDI 202.01	S-310	Compensating Interest Payment	S-261
Certificate Administrator	S-220	Condemnation Proceeds	S-250
Certificate Owners	S-270	Consent Fees	S-232
Certificate Principal Amount	S-245	Consultation Termination Event	S-323
Certificate Registrar	S-269	Control Eligible Certificates	S-266, S-323
Certificate Summary	S-6	Control Termination Event	S-323
Certificateholder	S-267	Controlling Class	S-323
Certificates	S-244	Controlling Class Certificateholder	S-323
Certifying Certificateholder	S-271	Controlling Class Representative	S-322
CGCMT 2015-P1 Certificate		Controlling Note Holder	S-164
Administrator	S-171	Corrected Loan	S-289
CGCMT 2015-P1 Controlling Class		CPR	S-275
Representative	S-164	CREFC®	S-336
CGCMT 2015-P1 Issuing Entity	S-163	CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty
CGCMT 2015-P1 Operating Advisor	S-171	License Fee	S-252
CGCMT 2015-P1 Pooling and Servicing		CREFC® Reports	S-335
Agreement	S-163	Cross Over Date	S-257
CGCMT 2015-P1 Securitization	S-162	Crossed Group	S-114

S-362

CRR	S-69	Excluded Controlling Class Holder	S-339
Custodian	S-218, S-319	Excluded Controlling Class Mortgage
Cut-off Date	S-110	Loan	S-323
Cut-off Date Balance	S-110	Excluded Information	S-339
Cut-off Date DSCR	S-115	Excluded Mortgage Loan	S-323
Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratio	S-114	Excluded Mortgage Loan Special
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio	S-114	Servicer	S-307
DBNTC	S-218	Excluded Special Servicer Mortgage
DBTCA	S-218	Loan	S-307
DCP	S-136	Exemption Rating Agency	S-352
Debt Service Coverage Ratio	S-115	FDIA	S-94
Debt Yield on Underwritten NCF	S-115	FDIC	S-94
Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Cash		FDIC Safe Harbor	S-94
Flow	S-115	FF&E	S-138
Debt Yield on Underwritten Net		FIEL	S-11
Operating Income	S-115	Final Asset Status Report	S-327
Debt Yield on Underwritten NOI	S-115	Financial Promotion Order	S-8
Defaulted Mortgage Loan	S-235	Fitch	S-304
Defeasance	E-1-9	Form 8-K	S-184
Defeasance Deposit	S-157	FPO Persons	S-8
Defeasance Loans	S-157	FSMA	S-8
Defeasance Lock Out Period	S-157	Goldman Originators	S-203
Defeasance Option	S-157	Grantor Trust	S-348
Defective Mortgage Loan	S-183	Ground Lease	E-1-10
Definitive Certificate	S-268	GS Bank	S-94
Depositaries	S-269	GS CRE	S-112
Depositor	S-112, S-198	GS CRE Mortgage Loans	S-112
Determination Date	S-250	GSMC	S-111, S-190
Directing Holder	S-322	GSMC Data Tape	S-190
Disclosable Special Servicer Fees	S-236	GSMC Deal Team	S-190
Distribution Account	S-295	GSMC Mortgage Loans	S-111
Distribution Date	S-248	Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan
Dodd-Frank Act	S-70	Combination	S-162
DSCR	S-115	Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgage
DTC	S-268	Loan	S-111
DTC Participants	S-269	Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu
Due Date	S-153	Companion Loan	S-162
Due Diligence Questionnaire	S-187	Hammons Hotel Portfolio Pari Passu
Due Diligence Requirement	S-69	Companion Loans	S-162
EEA	S-69	Hard Lockbox	S-116
Eilian	S-136	High Net Worth Companies,
Eligible Operating Advisor	S-330	Unincorporated Associations, Etc.	S-8
Environmental Condition	E-1-12	Illinois Center Loan Combination	S-161
ESA	S-133, E-1-12	Illinois Center Mortgage Loan	S-111
Euroclear	S-268	Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion
Euroclear Operator	S-270	Loan	S-161
Euroclear Participants	S-270	Illinois Center Pari Passu Companion
Excess Interest	S-154	Loans	S-161
Excess Interest Distribution Account	S-296	Indiana University ROFR	S-149
Excess Liquidation Proceeds Reserve		Indirect Participants	S-269
Account	S-296	Initial Pool Balance	S-110
Excess Modification Fees	S-232	Initial Rate	S-154
Excess Penalty Charges	S-233	In-Place Cash Management	S-116
Excess Prepayment Interest Shortfall	S-261	Institutional Investor	S-10
Exchange Act	S-184	Insurance Rating Requirements	E-1-4
Exchange Date	S-248	Interest Accrual Amount	S-250
Exchangeable Certificates	S-244	Interest Accrual Period	S-250
Exchangeable Distribution Account	S-296	Interest Distribution Amount	S-250
Exchangeable Proportion	S-247	Interest Only Mortgage Loans	S-153

S-363

Interest Reserve Account	S-295	Mortgage Pool	S-110
Interest Shortfall	S-250	Mortgaged Property	S-110
Interested Person	S-316	Mortgagee	E-1-13
Investment Company Act	1	Most Recent NOI	S-117
Investor Certification	S-268	MTBE	S-136
Investor Q&A Forum	S-339	Net Cash Flow	S-118
Investor Registry	S-339, S-340	Net Condemnation Proceeds	S-250
Issuing Entity	S-110	Net Mortgage Loan Rate	S-251
iStar	S-137	New Noteholder	S-139
iStar Borrower	S-137	Non-Recoverable Advance	S-292
JD Holdings	S-136	Non-Reduced Certificates	S-267
JDH ROFR	S-136	Notional Amount	S-246
JQH	S-136	NRSRO	S-356
JQH Hotels	S-136	NY Derivative Action	S-218
JQH Trust	S-132, S-136	Occupancy	S-117
KDEP	S-135	Occupancy Date	S-118
KGS	S-112, S-194	Offered Certificates	S-244
KGS Data Tape	S-195	Offered Regular Certificates	S-244
KGS Holdings	S-180	OID Regulations	S-349
KGS Mortgage Loans	S-112	OLA	S-95
KGS Review Team	S-194	Operating Advisor	S-223
Largest Tenant	S-116	Operating Advisor Fee	S-236
Largest Tenant Lease Expiration	S-116	Operating Advisor Fee Rate	S-236
Line of Credit	S-137	Operating Advisor Standard	S-327
Liquidation Fee	S-235	Operating Advisor Termination Event	S-329
Liquidation Fee Rate	S-235	Original Balance	S-118
Liquidation Proceeds	S-235	Originators	S-112, S-199
LNR	S-228	Orphan Parcel	S-152
LNR Partners	S-228	Other Crossed Loans	S-183
Loan Combination	S-110	Other Units	S-128
Loan Combination Custodial Account	S-295	Outside Controlling Class
Loan Per Unit	S-116	Representative	S-164
Loss of Value Payment	S-183	Outside Controlling Note Holder	S-111
Lower-Tier Distribution Account	S-295	Outside Operating Advisor	S-163
Lower-Tier Regular Interests	S-348	Outside Securitization	S-163
Lower-Tier REMIC	S-348	Outside Serviced Companion Loan	S-163
LTV Ratio at Maturity	S-116	Outside Serviced Loan Combination	S-163
LUST	S-134	Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan	S-163
MAI	S-263, E-1-13	Outside Servicer	S-163
Major Decision	S-320	Outside Servicing Agreement	S-163
MAS	S-10	Outside Special Servicer	S-163
Master Servicer	S-225	Outside Trustee	S-163
Master Servicer Remittance Date	S-291	P&I	S-226
Material Breach	S-182	P&I Advance	S-291
Material Document Defect	S-182	Pari Passu Companion Loan	S-110
Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio	S-116	Pari Passu Indemnified Items	S-302
Maturity Date LTV Ratio	S-116	Pari Passu Indemnified Parties	S-302
Modeling Assumptions	S-275	Pari Passu Loan Combination	S-110
Modification Fees	S-233	Participants	S-268
Monthly Payment	S-250	Pass-Through Rate	S-251
Moody’s	S-304	PCE	S-134
Morningstar	S-304	PCIS Persons	S-8
Mortgage	S-110	PCO	S-151
Mortgage File	S-180	PCR	S-202, S-207
Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement	S-179	Penalty Charges	S-233
Mortgage Loan Rate	S-252	Percentage Interest	S-248
Mortgage Loan Schedule	S-286	Permitted Encumbrances	E-1-3
Mortgage Loans	S-110	Permitted Special Servicer/Affiliate Fees	S-236
Mortgage Note	S-110	Phase I	S-133

S-364

Phase II	S-133	REO Account	S-244
PILOT	S-89	REO Companion Loan	S-253
PIPs	S-85, S-138	REO Mortgage Loan	S-253
Plaintiff Investors	S-218	REO Property	S-244
Plan Asset Regulations	S-352	Repurchase Price	S-181
Plans	S-352	Requesting Holders	S-265
PML	S-207	Requesting Party	S-333
Pooling and Servicing Agreement	S-112, S-285	Restricted Group	S-353
PPA	S-226	Restricted Party	S-327
Preferred Holder	S-133	Retention Requirement	S-69
Prepayment Assumption	S-350	Revised Rate	S-154
Prepayment Interest Excess	S-261	RevPAR	S-118
Prepayment Interest Shortfall	S-261	RFT	S-180
Prepayment Penalty Description	S-118	Rialto	S-111, S-192
Prepayment Provision	S-118	Rialto Data Tape	S-193
Prime Rate	S-292	Rialto Mortgage Loans	S-111, S-192
Principal Balance Certificates	S-245	Rialto Review Team	S-192
Principal Distribution Amount	S-252	Risk Factors	S-6
Principal Shortfall	S-253	RMBS	S-218
Privileged Information	S-327	ROFO	S-149
Privileged Information Exception	S-327	ROFR	S-149
Privileged Person	S-340	Rooms	S-119
Professional Investors	S-10	Rule 17g-5	S-309
Promotion of Collective Investment		Rules	S-270
Schemes Exemptions Order	S-8	Sage Dental	S-147
Property Advances	S-291	SDNY Action	S-218
Prospectus	S-10	SEC	S-184
Prospectus Directive	S-9	SEC EDGAR filings	S-338
PTE	S-352	Securities Act	S-179, S-341
Public Documents	S-337	SEL	S-207, E-1-5
Qualification Criteria	S-193, S-196	Sequential Pay Certificates	S-245
Qualified Investor	S-9	Serviced AB Loan Combination	S-110
Qualified Investors	S-9	Serviced Companion Loan	S-110, S-162
Qualified Substitute Mortgage Loan	S-182	Serviced Companion Loan Holder	S-110
RadioShack	S-148	Serviced Companion Loan Securities	S-304
RAIT	S-112, S-196	Serviced Loan Combination	S-110, S-163
RAIT Data Tape	S-197	Serviced Loans	S-111
RAIT Mortgage Loans	S-112	Serviced Mortgage Loans	S-111
RAIT Partnership	S-196	Serviced Outside Controlled Companion
RAIT Securitization Team	S-197	Loan	S-111
Rated Final Distribution Date	S-184	Serviced Outside Controlled Loan
Rating Agencies	S-358	Combination	S-110
Rating Agency	S-358	Serviced Outside Controlled Mortgage
Rating Agency Confirmation	S-334	Loan	S-111
Rating Agency Declination	S-334	Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan	S-110
Realized Loss	S-260	Serviced Pari Passu Companion Loan
REC	S-133	Holder	S-110
Recognized Collective Investment		Serviced Pari Passu Loan Combination	S-110
Scheme	S-8	Serviced Subordinate Companion Loan	S-110
Record Date	S-248	Serviced Subordinate Companion Loan
Regular Certificates	S-244	Holder	S-110
Regulation AB	S-179	Servicer Termination Events	S-303
Related Group	S-118	Servicing Fee	S-231
Release Date	S-157	Servicing Fee Rate	S-231
Release Parcel	S-160	Servicing Function Participant	S-301
Relevant Member State	S-9	Servicing Standard	S-287
Relevant Person	S-10	Servicing Transfer Event	S-288
Relevant Persons	S-8	SFA	S-10
REMIC	S-348	SH	S-223

S-365

Similar Law	S-355	TRIPRA	S-92
Similar Requirements	S-70	Trust Component	S-247
Single-Purpose Entity	E-1-9	Trust REMICs	S-348
Situs	S-223	Trustee	S-218
Soft Lockbox	S-118	Trustee/Certificate Administrator Fee	S-223
Soft Springing Lockbox	S-118	Trustee/Certificate Administrator Fee
Somerset Park Apartments Companion		Rate	S-223
Loan Holders	S-162	Underwriter Entities	S-96
Somerset Park Apartments Controlling		Underwriter Exemption	S-352
Note Holder	S-176	Underwritten EGI	S-119
Somerset Park Apartments Loan		Underwritten Expenses	S-118
Combination	S-162	Underwritten NCF	S-118
Somerset Park Apartments Mortgage		Underwritten NCF DSCR	S-115
Loan	S-111	Underwritten Net Cash Flow	S-118
Somerset Park Apartments Non-		Underwritten Net Operating Income	S-119
Controlling Note Holder	S-177	Underwritten NOI	S-119
Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu		Underwritten Revenues	S-119
Companion Loan	S-162	Units	S-119
Somerset Park Apartments Pari Passu		Unscheduled Payments	S-253
Companion Loans	S-162	UPB	S-223, S-226
Special Servicer	S-228	Updated Appraisal	S-311
Special Servicer Decision	S-317	Upper Tier Distribution Account	S-295
Special Servicing Fee	S-233	Upper-Tier REMIC	S-348
Special Servicing Fee Rate	S-234	USEPA	S-135
Specially Serviced Loan	S-288	UST	S-134
Split Mortgage Loan	S-110	Volcker Rule	S-70
Sponsors	S-112, S-185	Voting Rights	S-266
Springing Cash Management	S-118	WAC Rate	S-251
Springing Lockbox	S-118	Wachovia	S-225
Standard Qualifications	E-1-1	Walgreens	S-148
Stated Principal Balance	S-252	Weighted Average Mortgage Loan Rate	S-120
Stone Point	S-223	Wells Fargo	S-225
Structured Product	S-10	WFCM 2015-C30 Certificate
Subordinate Companion Loan	S-110	Administrator	S-175
Summary	S-6	WFCM 2015-C30 Controlling Class
TCO	S-151	Representative	S-164
Terms and Conditions	S-271	WFCM 2015-C30 Issuing Entity	S-163
Terrorism Cap Amount	E-1-8	WFCM 2015-C30 Operating Advisor	S-175
The Decoration & Design Building		WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing
Companion Loan Holder	S-162	Agreement	S-163
The Decoration & Design Building Loan		WFCM 2015-C30 Securitization	S-162
Combination	S-162	WFCM 2015-C30 Servicer	S-163
The Decoration & Design Building		WFCM 2015-C30 Special Servicer	S-163
Mortgage Loan	S-111	WFCM 2015-C30 Trustee	S-163
The Decoration & Design Building Pari		Withheld Amounts	S-295
Passu Companion Loan	S-162	Workout Fee	S-234
Third Party Report	S-112	Workout Fee Rate	S-234
TIA	S-310	Workout-Delayed Reimbursement
TIA Applicability Determination	S-310	Amount	S-294
Title Exception	E-1-2	YM Group A	S-257
Title Policy	E-1-2	YM Group B	S-257
Trailing 12 NOI	S-117	YM Groups	S-257
Tranche Percentage Interest	S-247	Zoning Regulations	E-1-7
TRIA	E-1-8

S-366

ANNEX A

STATISTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MORTGAGE LOANS

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number

Loan / Property Flag

Footnotes

Mortgage Loan Seller

Originator

Property Name

Related Group

Crossed Group

Address

City

State

Zip Code

General Property Type

Detailed Property Type

1

Loan

8, 9, 10, 11, 12

CGMRC

CGMRC

Illinois Center

NAP

NAP

1.01

Property

111 East Wacker

111 East Wacker Drive

Chicago

Illinois

60601

Office

CBD

1.02

Property

233 North Michigan Avenue

233 North Michigan Avenue

Chicago

Illinois

60601

Office

CBD

2

Loan

8, 13, 14, 15, 16

GSMC

GSMC

Hammons Hotel Portfolio

NAP

NAP

2.01

Property

17

Embassy Suites Concord, NC

5400 John Q Hammons Drive Northwest

Concord

North Carolina

28027

Hospitality

Full Service

2.02

Property

Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN

1200 Conference Center Boulevard

Murfreesboro

Tennessee

37129

Hospitality

Full Service

2.03

Property

Embassy Suites Norman, OK

2501 Conference Drive

Norman

Oklahoma

73069

Hospitality

Full Service

2.04

Property

15

Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX

210 East Stacy Road

Allen

Texas

75002

Hospitality

Limited Service

2.05

Property

15, 18

Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ

9495 West Coyotes Boulevard, 6633 North 95th Street, 9460 Coyotes Street and 9494 West Maryland Avenue

Glendale

Arizona

85305

Hospitality

Full Service

2.06

Property

Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL

800 Monroe Street Southwest

Huntsville

Alabama

35801

Hospitality

Full Service

2.07

Property

15

Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO

10300 North Ambassador Drive

Kansas City

Missouri

64153

Hospitality

Extended Stay

3

Loan

19, 20

CGMRC

CGMRC

The Decoration & Design Building

NAP

NAP

979 Third Avenue

New York

New York

10022

Office

CBD

4

Loan

21

GSMC

GSMC

Hamilton Landing

NAP

NAP

3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10 Hamilton Landing

Novato

California

94949

Office

General Suburban

5

Loan

8, 22, 23

GSMC

GSMC

Courtyard Sunnyvale

NAP

NAP

660 West El Camino Real

Sunnyvale

California

94087

Hospitality

Select Service

6

Loan

8, 24, 25

RMF

RMF

Somerset Park Apartments

NAP

NAP

1911 Golfview Drive

Troy

Michigan

48084

Multifamily

Garden

7

Loan

8, 26, 27

RMF

RMF

Greylyn Business Park

NAP

NAP

9101-9535 Monroe Road

Charlotte

North Carolina

28270

Industrial

Flex

8

Loan

8, 28

GSMC

GSMC

Pavilion Jenkintown

NAP

NAP

261 Old York Road

Jenkintown

Pennsylvania

19046

Mixed Use

Office/Retail/Self Storage

9

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

University Place

NAP

NAP

1300 East Main Street

Carbondale

Illinois

62901

Retail

Anchored

10

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio

NAP

NAP

10.01

Property

Dale Avenue Roanoke

2141 Dale Avenue Southeast

Roanoke

Virginia

24013

Retail

Single Tenant Retail

10.02

Property

Plantation Road Walmart

4950 Plantation Road

Roanoke

Virginia

24019

Retail

Single Tenant Retail

10.03

Property

Walmart Orange Avenue

3419 Orange Avenue Northeast

Roanoke

Virginia

24012

Retail

Single Tenant Retail

11

Loan

8, 29

CGMRC

CGMRC

Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio

NAP

NAP

11.01

Property

Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills

160 West Avon Road

Rochester Hills

Michigan

48307

Self Storage

Self Storage

11.02

Property

Compass Self Storage Novi

40900 Grand River Avenue

Novi

Michigan

48375

Self Storage

Self Storage

11.03

Property

Compass Self Storage Madison Heights

32000 John R Road

Madison Heights

Michigan

48071

Self Storage

Self Storage

12

Loan

30

GSMC

GSMC

Mix at Midtown

NAP

NAP

3201 Louisiana Street

Houston

Texas

77006

Retail

Anchored

13

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Red Dot Storage Portfolio

NAP

NAP

13.01

Property

Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL

2105 South Eastwood Drive

Woodstock

Illinois

60098

Self Storage

Self Storage

13.02

Property

Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL

1960 Wiesbrook Road

Oswego

Illinois

60543

Self Storage

Self Storage

13.03

Property

Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL

8101 North Hale Avenue

Peoria

Illinois

61615

Self Storage

Self Storage

13.04

Property

Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL

3305 16th Street

Zion

Illinois

60099

Self Storage

Self Storage

13.05

Property

Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI

180 Elizabeth Lane

Genoa City

Wisconsin

53128

Self Storage

Self Storage

13.06

Property

Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL

204 Wolf Street

Yorkville

Illinois

60560

Self Storage

Self Storage

13.07

Property

Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI

1900 Alden Road

Janesville

Wisconsin

53545

Self Storage

Self Storage

13.08

Property

Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL

1243 Shappert Drive

Machesney Park

Illinois

61115

Self Storage

Self Storage

13.09

Property

Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL

5750 Sandy Hollow Road

Rockford

Illinois

61109

Self Storage

Self Storage

14

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Stadium Plaza

NAP

NAP

2001 West Worley Street

Columbia

Missouri

65203

Retail

Anchored

15

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Houston Hotel Portfolio

NAP

NAP

15.01

Property

Holiday Inn Express West Road

9120 West Road

Houston

Texas

77064

Hospitality

Limited Service

15.02

Property

Hampton Inn Port Arthur

7660 Memorial Boulevard

Port Arthur

Texas

77642

Hospitality

Limited Service

16

Loan

RMF

RMF

Courtyard at Cedar Hills

NAP

NAP

13643 Southwest Electric Street

Beaverton

Oregon

97005

Multifamily

Garden

17

Loan

31

GSMC

GSMC

Peckham Square

NAP

NAP

3650, 3750 and 3800 Kietzke Lane

Reno

Nevada

89502

Retail

Anchored

18

Loan

32, 33

CGMRC

CGMRC

Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center

NAP

NAP

18.01

Property

33

Mason Town House

301-365 Deerpath Lane

DeKalb

Illinois

60115

Multifamily

Student Housing

18.02

Property

33

Park View Business Center

1500 Sycamore Road

DeKalb

Illinois

60115

Retail

Unanchored

19

Loan

GSMC

GSMC

Dover Marketplace

NAP

NAP

2130 Palomino Road

Dover

Pennsylvania

17315

Retail

Anchored

20

Loan

34, 35

RAIT Funding, LLC

RAIT Funding, LLC

Lanier Crossing Shopping Center

NAP

NAP

655 Atlanta Road

Cumming

Georgia

30040

Retail

Anchored

21

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Waterway Shoppes II

NAP

NAP

2310-2410 Weston Road

Weston

Florida

33326

Retail

Unanchored

22

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Avenue District Apartments

NAP

NAP

1211 Saint Clair Avenue Northeast

Cleveland

Ohio

44114

Multifamily

Mid-Rise

23

Loan

RAIT Funding, LLC

RAIT Funding, LLC

University Retail Portfolio

NAP

NAP

23.01

Property

517 Kirkwood Avenue

517 East Kirkwood Avenue

Bloomington

Indiana

47408

Mixed Use

Office/Retail

23.02

Property

36

501 East Green Street

501 East Green Street

Champaign

Illinois

61820

Retail

Unanchored

23.03

Property

1801 West Tennessee Street

1801 West Tennessee Street

Tallahassee

Florida

32304

Retail

Unanchored

24

Loan

RMF

RMF

Carrollwood Village Shoppes

NAP

NAP

12904-13050 North Dale Mabry Highway

Tampa

Florida

33618

Retail

Unanchored

25

Loan

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Plaza El Toro

Group 2

NAP

23330-23384, 23402 El Toro Road and 24842-24882 Muirlands Boulevard

Lake Forest

California

92630

Retail

Anchored

26

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Barclay Village

NAP

NAP

775 Cascade Street

Oregon City

Oregon

97045

Multifamily

Garden

27

Loan

RMF

RMF

Hyatt Plantation

Group 1

NAP

8530 West Broward Boulevard

Plantation

Florida

33324

Hospitality

Select Service

28

Loan

37

GSMC

GSMC

Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar

NAP

NAP

3939 Ocean Bluff Avenue

San Diego

California

92130

Hospitality

Limited Service

29

Loan

RMF

RMF

Riverwalk Center

NAP

NAP

150 South US Highway 1

Jupiter

Florida

33477

Office

General Suburban

30

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Premiere Building

NAP

NAP

1250 East Hallandale Beach Boulevard

Hallandale Beach

Florida

33009

Office

General Suburban

31

Loan

8, 38

CGMRC

CGMRC

TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio

NAP

NAP

31.01

Property

Keystone

8468 Union Chapel Road

Indianapolis

Indiana

46240

Hospitality

Extended Stay

31.02

Property

Park 100

5802 West 71st Street

Indianapolis

Indiana

46278

Hospitality

Extended Stay

32

Loan

8, 39, 40

CGMRC

CGMRC

Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky

NAP

NAP

420 Riverboat Row

Newport

Kentucky

41071

Hospitality

Limited Service

33

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Anderson Oaks

NAP

NAP

9219 Anderson Mill Road

Austin

Texas

78729

Multifamily

Garden

A-1

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number

Loan / Property Flag

Footnotes

Mortgage Loan Seller

Originator

Property Name

Related Group

Crossed Group

Address

City

State

Zip Code

General Property Type

Detailed Property Type

34

Loan

41

CGMRC

CGMRC

Easy Stop Storage Portfolio

NAP

NAP

34.01

Property

Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop

4500 North East Loop 338

Odessa

Texas

79762

Self Storage

Self Storage

34.02

Property

Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop

3806 West Loop 250 North

Midland

Texas

79707

Self Storage

Self Storage

34.03

Property

Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial

3105 West Industrial Ave

Midland

Texas

79701

Self Storage

Self Storage

35

Loan

42, 43

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Scott’s Edge Apartments

NAP

NAP

3408 West Moore Street

Richmond

Virginia

23230

Multifamily

Garden

36

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Solomon CVS Portfolio

NAP

NAP

36.01

Property

CVS Brandon

112 Stribling Lane

Brandon

Mississippi

39042

Retail

Single Tenant Retail

36.02

Property

CVS Paris

3710 Lamar Avenue

Paris

Texas

75462

Retail

Single Tenant Retail

36.03

Property

CVS Plano

1501 Independence Parkway

Plano

Texas

75075

Retail

Single Tenant Retail

37

Loan

8

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Westgate Plaza

Group 2

NAP

3724-3758 La Sierra Ave and 11130-11170 Magnolia Ave

Riverside

California

92505

Retail

Anchored

38

Loan

8, 44

CGMRC

CGMRC

Residence Inn Southern Pines

NAP

NAP

105 Brucewood Road

Southern Pines

North Carolina

28387

Hospitality

Extended Stay

39

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Imperial Landing Apartments

NAP

NAP

16001 Cotillion Drive

Houston

Texas

77060

Multifamily

Garden

40

Loan

8

CGMRC

CGMRC

Corporate Place

NAP

NAP

25800 Science Park Drive

Beachwood

Ohio

44122

Office

General Suburban

41

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Bricktown Shopping Center

NAP

NAP

135 Van Zile Road

Brick

New Jersey

08724

Retail

Anchored

42

Loan

RMF

RMF

Hyatt John’s Creek

Group 1

NAP

11505 Medlock Bridge Road

Johns Creek

Georgia

30097

Hospitality

Select Service

43

Loan

RMF

RMF

Hyatt Place Rogers

Group 1

NAP

4610 West Walnut Street

Rogers

Arkansas

72756

Hospitality

Select Service

44

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

AR&C Storage

NAP

NAP

1 Back Creek Road

Trenton

New Jersey

08691

Self Storage

Self Storage

45

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages

NAP

NAP

11727 Northeast 63rd Drive

Lady Lake

Florida

32162

Hospitality

Limited Service

46

Loan

RAIT Funding, LLC

RAIT Funding, LLC

Renaissance Faire I

NAP

NAP

807-829 South 60th Street

West Allis

Wisconsin

53214

Mixed Use

Flex

47

Loan

RMF

RMF

Cottages at White Oak

NAP

NAP

66 Cottage Drive

Newnan

Georgia

30265

Multifamily

Garden

48

Loan

45

GSMC

GSMC

Village Square Shopping Center

NAP

NAP

421 Columbia Avenue

Lexington

South Carolina

29072

Retail

Anchored

49

Loan

RMF

RMF

Northstone Apartments

NAP

NAP

4021 Northstone Drive

Raleigh

North Carolina

27604

Multifamily

Garden

50

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Willow Park Apartments

NAP

NAP

6701 Northwest Maple Drive

Lawton

Oklahoma

73505

Multifamily

Garden

51

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Cherry Creek

NAP

NAP

18300 Governors Highway

Homewood

Illinois

60430

Retail

Unanchored

52

Loan

8

CGMRC

CGMRC

Glenville Target Center

NAP

NAP

10 Glenridge Road

Glenville

New York

12302

Retail

Shadow Anchored

53

Loan

8, 46

RMF

RMF

Glades Tower II

NAP

NAP

900 Glades Road

Boca Raton

Florida

33431

Office

Medical

54

Loan

47

RMF

RMF

Maximum Self Storage

NAP

NAP

6185 South Pecos Road

Las Vegas

Nevada

89120

Self Storage

Self Storage

55

Loan

8, 48

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Sonora Crossroads

NAP

NAP

1191-1281 Sanguinetti Road

Sonora

California

95370

Retail

Shadow Anchored

56

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Albertson’s Retail Shops

NAP

NAP

1565 & 1617 West US Highway 50

Pueblo

Colorado

81008

Retail

Shadow Anchored

57

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

210 Bedford Avenue

NAP

NAP

210 Bedford Avenue

Brooklyn

New York

11249

Mixed Use

Retail/Multifamily

58

Loan

RMF

RMF

Capital Clifton Park Self Storage

NAP

NAP

1406A Route 9

Clifton Park

New York

12065

Self Storage

Self Storage

59

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Hunters Pointe

Group 3

NAP

860-990 Sturbridge Drive and 1095-1105 Sunhaven Drive

Medina

Ohio

44256

Multifamily

Garden

60

Loan

49

GSMC

GSMC

AkzoNobel Coatings

NAP

NAP

8220 Mohawk Drive

Strongsville

Ohio

44136

Industrial

Flex

61

Loan

GSMC

GSMC

4238 West Hundred Road

NAP

NAP

4238 West Hundred Road

Chester

Virginia

23831

Retail

Single Tenant Retail

62

Loan

50, 51

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)

NAP

NAP

21522-21526 Ventura Boulevard

Woodland Hills

California

91364

Retail

Unanchored

63

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Gardens of Victoria

NAP

NAP

313 Williamsburg Avenue

Victoria

Texas

77904

Multifamily

Garden

64

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Woodview Commons

Group 3

NAP

1097, 1107 and 1117 Frost Road

Streetsboro

Ohio

44241

Multifamily

Garden

A-2

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Year Built	Year Renovated	Units, Pads, Rooms,  SF, Beds	Unit Description	Loan Per Unit ($)	Ownership Interest	Original  Balance ($)	Cut-off Date Balance ($)	Allocated Cut-off Date Loan Amount ($)	% of Initial Pool Balance	Balloon Balance ($)
1	Loan	8, 9, 10, 11, 12	CGMRC	CGMRC	Illinois Center			2,091,889	SF	124.29		100,000,000	100,000,000	100,000,000	10.4%	91,499,858
1.01	Property				111 East Wacker	1969	2011-2014	1,018,462	SF		Fee Simple			56,439,703
1.02	Property				233 North Michigan Avenue	1972	2011-2014	1,073,427	SF		Fee Simple			43,560,297
2	Loan	8, 13, 14, 15, 16	GSMC	GSMC	Hammons Hotel Portfolio			1,869	Rooms	134,189.41		100,000,000	100,000,000	100,000,000	10.4%	82,096,288
2.01	Property	17			Embassy Suites Concord, NC	2007	NAP	308	Rooms		Fee Simple/Leasehold			24,924,242
2.02	Property				Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN	2008	NAP	283	Rooms		Fee Simple			20,235,247
2.03	Property				Embassy Suites Norman, OK	2008	NAP	283	Rooms		Fee Simple			15,674,641
2.04	Property	15			Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX	2010	NAP	228	Rooms		Fee Simple			12,443,344
2.05	Property	15, 18			Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ	2007	NAP	320	Rooms		Fee Simple/Leasehold			11,974,976
2.06	Property				Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL	2006	NAP	295	Rooms		Leasehold			10,103,668
2.07	Property	15			Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO	2007	2015	152	Rooms		Fee Simple			4,643,882
3	Loan	19, 20	CGMRC	CGMRC	The Decoration & Design Building	1963	2001	588,512	SF	280.37	Leasehold	65,000,000	65,000,000	65,000,000	6.8%	59,101,522
4	Loan	21	GSMC	GSMC	Hamilton Landing	1936	2000-2008	406,355	SF	147.65	Fee Simple	60,000,000	60,000,000	60,000,000	6.3%	60,000,000
5	Loan	8, 22, 23	GSMC	GSMC	Courtyard Sunnyvale	2014	NAP	145	Rooms	280,000.00	Fee Simple	40,600,000	40,600,000	40,600,000	4.2%	37,282,428
6	Loan	8, 24, 25	RMF	RMF	Somerset Park Apartments	1964	2015	2,226	Units	80,862.53	Fee Simple	36,500,000	36,500,000	36,500,000	3.8%	36,500,000
7	Loan	8, 26, 27	RMF	RMF	Greylyn Business Park	1965-1998	NAP	648,314	SF	54.95	Fee Simple	35,625,000	35,625,000	35,625,000	3.7%	31,416,309
8	Loan	8, 28	GSMC	GSMC	Pavilion Jenkintown	1967	2010, 2012	359,826	SF	86.79	Fee Simple	31,270,000	31,230,786	31,230,786	3.3%	25,083,527
9	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	University Place	1974, 1989, 2010	2010	250,159	SF	111.93	Fee Simple	28,000,000	28,000,000	28,000,000	2.9%	25,588,293
10	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio			124,073	SF	209.93		26,046,472	26,046,472	26,046,472	2.7%	22,863,891
10.01	Property				Dale Avenue Roanoke	2015	NAP	41,117	SF		Fee Simple			9,080,000
10.02	Property				Plantation Road Walmart	2015	NAP	41,839	SF		Fee Simple			8,571,750
10.03	Property				Walmart Orange Avenue	2015	NAP	41,117	SF		Fee Simple			8,394,722
11	Loan	8, 29	CGMRC	CGMRC	Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio			208,582	SF	100.68		21,000,000	21,000,000	21,000,000	2.2%	18,387,559
11.01	Property				Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills	2005	NAP	64,868	SF		Fee Simple			7,500,000
11.02	Property				Compass Self Storage Novi	2003	NAP	68,589	SF		Fee Simple			7,500,000
11.03	Property				Compass Self Storage Madison Heights	2002	NAP	75,125	SF		Fee Simple			6,000,000
12	Loan	30	GSMC	GSMC	Mix at Midtown	1970, 2008	NAP	72,901	SF	267.49	Fee Simple	19,500,000	19,500,000	19,500,000	2.0%	15,667,819
13	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Red Dot Storage Portfolio			412,585	SF	38.78		16,000,000	16,000,000	16,000,000	1.7%	14,025,709
13.01	Property				Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL	1999-2002	NAP	47,650	SF		Fee Simple			2,892,500
13.02	Property				Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL	2001	NAP	60,750	SF		Fee Simple			2,475,000
13.03	Property				Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL	1977-1994	NAP	74,120	SF		Fee Simple			2,377,500
13.04	Property				Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL	2002-2009	NAP	41,500	SF		Fee Simple			2,150,000
13.05	Property				Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI	2002-2009	NAP	55,780	SF		Fee Simple			1,695,000
13.06	Property				Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL	1995	NAP	30,000	SF		Fee Simple			1,537,500
13.07	Property				Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI	1986-2008	NAP	45,875	SF		Fee Simple			1,305,000
13.08	Property				Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL	2006-2009	NAP	31,500	SF		Fee Simple			817,500
13.09	Property				Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL	1992-1999	NAP	25,410	SF		Fee Simple			750,000
14	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Stadium Plaza	1969	2004	127,458	SF	121.47	Fee Simple	15,500,000	15,482,942	15,482,942	1.6%	12,682,461
15	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Houston Hotel Portfolio			159	Rooms	88,050.31		14,000,000	14,000,000	14,000,000	1.5%	11,400,781
15.01	Property				Holiday Inn Express West Road	2010	NAP	87	Rooms		Fee Simple			8,500,000
15.02	Property				Hampton Inn Port Arthur	2007	2014	72	Rooms		Fee Simple			5,500,000
16	Loan		RMF	RMF	Courtyard at Cedar Hills	1969, 1975	NAP	145	Units	89,655.17	Fee Simple	13,000,000	13,000,000	13,000,000	1.4%	13,000,000
17	Loan	31	GSMC	GSMC	Peckham Square	1974	1990, 2005	133,318	SF	93.39	Fee Simple	12,450,000	12,450,000	12,450,000	1.3%	10,558,007
18	Loan	32, 33	CGMRC	CGMRC	Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center			Various	Units / SF	55.90		11,700,000	11,700,000	11,700,000	1.2%	10,560,948
18.01	Property	33			Mason Town House	2005	NAP	65	Units		Fee Simple			8,325,000
18.02	Property	33			Park View Business Center	1972-1994	NAP	44,081	SF		Fee Simple			3,375,000
19	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	Dover Marketplace	2001	NAP	61,044	SF	184.29	Fee Simple	11,250,000	11,250,000	11,250,000	1.2%	10,302,398
20	Loan	34, 35	RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Lanier Crossing Shopping Center	1989	NAP	110,002	SF	101.82	Fee Simple	11,200,000	11,200,000	11,200,000	1.2%	9,211,814
21	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Waterway Shoppes II	2003	NAP	31,357	SF	350.80	Fee Simple	11,000,000	11,000,000	11,000,000	1.1%	10,093,324
22	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Avenue District Apartments	2009	2012	59	Units	179,661.02	Fee Simple	10,600,000	10,600,000	10,600,000	1.1%	9,234,906
23	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	University Retail Portfolio			33,143	SF	312.16		10,346,000	10,346,000	10,346,000	1.1%	9,529,537
23.01	Property				517 Kirkwood Avenue	1929	2007	20,924	SF		Fee Simple			4,906,640
23.02	Property	36			501 East Green Street	2005	NAP	4,719	SF		Fee Simple			2,803,794
23.03	Property				1801 West Tennessee Street	1995	2010	7,500	SF		Fee Simple			2,635,566
24	Loan		RMF	RMF	Carrollwood Village Shoppes	1984	2007-2008	45,353	SF	226.56	Fee Simple	10,275,000	10,275,000	10,275,000	1.1%	9,449,902
25	Loan		KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Plaza El Toro	1973	2002	53,293	SF	187.64	Fee Simple	10,000,000	10,000,000	10,000,000	1.0%	8,590,578
26	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Barclay Village	1987	NAP	146	Units	67,123.29	Fee Simple	9,800,000	9,800,000	9,800,000	1.0%	9,800,000
27	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Plantation	1997	2007	126	Rooms	75,238.10	Fee Simple	9,480,000	9,480,000	9,480,000	1.0%	7,781,833
28	Loan	37	GSMC	GSMC	Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar	2008	2014	80	Rooms	115,625.00	Fee Simple	9,250,000	9,250,000	9,250,000	1.0%	7,885,823
29	Loan		RMF	RMF	Riverwalk Center	2003	2013	35,324	SF	257.62	Fee Simple	9,100,000	9,100,000	9,100,000	0.9%	8,008,026
30	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Premiere Building	1973	NAP	111,883	SF	80.44	Fee Simple	9,000,000	9,000,000	9,000,000	0.9%	9,000,000
31	Loan	8, 38	CGMRC	CGMRC	TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio			176	Rooms	51,136.36		9,000,000	9,000,000	9,000,000	0.9%	7,696,934
31.01	Property				Keystone	1999	2014	82	Rooms		Fee Simple			5,790,000
31.02	Property				Park 100	1999	2014	94	Rooms		Fee Simple			3,210,000
32	Loan	8, 39, 40	CGMRC	CGMRC	Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky	1997	2012-2014	124	Rooms	66,935.48	Fee Simple	8,300,000	8,300,000	8,300,000	0.9%	7,728,486
33	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Anderson Oaks	1983	2014-2015	136	Units	60,294.12	Fee Simple	8,200,000	8,200,000	8,200,000	0.9%	6,995,849

A-3

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Year Built	Year Renovated	Units, Pads, Rooms,  SF, Beds	Unit Description	Loan Per Unit ($)	Ownership Interest	Original  Balance ($)	Cut-off Date Balance ($)	Allocated Cut-off Date Loan Amount ($)	% of Initial Pool Balance	Balloon Balance ($)
34	Loan	41	CGMRC	CGMRC	Easy Stop Storage Portfolio			165,752	SF	49.47		8,200,000	8,200,000	8,200,000	0.9%	6,715,603
34.01	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop	1997	2007	74,679	SF		Fee Simple			4,100,000
34.02	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop	2002	2011	58,832	SF		Fee Simple			3,250,000
34.03	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial	1980	NAP	32,241	SF		Fee Simple			850,000
35	Loan	42, 43	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Scott’s Edge Apartments	1934	2014	94	Units	86,702.13	Fee Simple	8,150,000	8,150,000	8,150,000	0.9%	7,165,244
36	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Solomon CVS Portfolio			37,431	SF	213.73		8,000,000	8,000,000	8,000,000	0.8%	5,949,114
36.01	Property				CVS Brandon	2003	NAP	13,813	SF		Fee Simple			3,570,248
36.02	Property				CVS Paris	1999	NAP	12,738	SF		Fee Simple			2,710,744
36.03	Property				CVS Plano	1996	NAP	10,880	SF		Fee Simple			1,719,008
37	Loan	8	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Westgate Plaza	1984	2002	65,994	SF	116.68	Fee Simple/Leasehold	7,700,000	7,700,000	7,700,000	0.8%	6,614,744
38	Loan	8, 44	CGMRC	CGMRC	Residence Inn Southern Pines	1996	2012-2014	80	Rooms	91,766.23	Fee Simple	7,350,000	7,341,299	7,341,299	0.8%	6,730,082
39	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Imperial Landing Apartments	1981	2015	264	Units	27,651.52	Fee Simple	7,300,000	7,300,000	7,300,000	0.8%	6,274,066
40	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Corporate Place	1988	NAP	87,256	SF	80.37	Fee Simple	7,012,500	7,012,500	7,012,500	0.7%	5,990,798
41	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Bricktown Shopping Center	1963	NAP	97,229	SF	71.99	Fee Simple	7,000,000	7,000,000	7,000,000	0.7%	6,137,657
42	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt John’s Creek	1997	2007	122	Rooms	56,967.21	Fee Simple	6,950,000	6,950,000	6,950,000	0.7%	5,705,037
43	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Place Rogers	2002	2007	103	Rooms	66,893.20	Fee Simple	6,890,000	6,890,000	6,890,000	0.7%	5,655,784
44	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	AR&C Storage	2009	NAP	67,844	SF	97.28	Fee Simple	6,600,000	6,600,000	6,600,000	0.7%	5,769,800
45	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages	2005	2010	82	Rooms	78,048.78	Fee Simple	6,400,000	6,400,000	6,400,000	0.7%	4,928,752
46	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Renaissance Faire I	1939	1984	175,532	SF	35.85	Fee Simple	6,300,000	6,292,749	6,292,749	0.7%	5,121,191
47	Loan		RMF	RMF	Cottages at White Oak	2001	NAP	65	Units	86,738.81	Fee Simple	5,650,000	5,638,023	5,638,023	0.6%	4,649,284
48	Loan	45	GSMC	GSMC	Village Square Shopping Center	1982	1996	59,896	SF	93.50	Fee Simple	5,600,000	5,600,000	5,600,000	0.6%	4,773,925
49	Loan		RMF	RMF	Northstone Apartments	2000	NAP	120	Units	45,833.33	Fee Simple	5,500,000	5,500,000	5,500,000	0.6%	5,040,140
50	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Willow Park Apartments	1985	NAP	160	Units	33,750.00	Fee Simple	5,400,000	5,400,000	5,400,000	0.6%	4,723,854
51	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Cherry Creek	1970	NAP	70,404	SF	73.86	Fee Simple	5,200,000	5,200,000	5,200,000	0.5%	4,463,594
52	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Glenville Target Center	2013	NAP	35,616	SF	137.41	Fee Simple	4,900,000	4,894,134	4,894,134	0.5%	3,959,390
53	Loan	8, 46	RMF	RMF	Glades Tower II	1986	NAP	20,126	SF	213.65	Fee Simple	4,300,000	4,300,000	4,300,000	0.4%	3,836,177
54	Loan	47	RMF	RMF	Maximum Self Storage	1995, 1996	NAP	87,301	SF	48.97	Fee Simple	4,275,000	4,275,000	4,275,000	0.4%	3,924,261
55	Loan	8, 48	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Sonora Crossroads	1995	NAP	20,325	SF	198.03	Fee Simple	4,025,000	4,025,000	4,025,000	0.4%	3,398,925
56	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Albertson’s Retail Shops	1997, 2004	NAP	22,744	SF	175.87	Fee Simple	4,000,000	4,000,000	4,000,000	0.4%	3,588,779
57	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	210 Bedford Avenue	1899	2015	2,755	SF	1,361.16	Fee Simple	3,750,000	3,750,000	3,750,000	0.4%	3,438,095
58	Loan		RMF	RMF	Capital Clifton Park Self Storage	2000	NAP	52,300	SF	70.28	Fee Simple	3,680,000	3,675,884	3,675,884	0.4%	3,004,043
59	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Hunters Pointe	1990	NAP	60	Units	56,536.83	Fee Simple	3,400,000	3,392,210	3,392,210	0.4%	2,766,726
60	Loan	49	GSMC	GSMC	AkzoNobel Coatings	2000	2015	77,500	SF	41.24	Fee Simple	3,200,000	3,196,257	3,196,257	0.3%	2,594,966
61	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	4238 West Hundred Road	2005	NAP	14,820	SF	204.67	Fee Simple	3,037,000	3,033,168	3,033,168	0.3%	2,433,754
62	Loan	50, 51	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)	1985	NAP	10,092	SF	221.02	Fee Simple	2,233,000	2,230,560	2,230,560	0.2%	1,828,911
63	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Gardens of Victoria	1983	2014-2015	66	Units	30,397.73	Fee Simple	2,006,250	2,006,250	2,006,250	0.2%	1,727,875
64	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Woodview Commons	1971	NAP	36	Units	44,444.44	Fee Simple	1,600,000	1,600,000	1,600,000	0.2%	1,289,920

A-4

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Mortgage Loan Rate (%)	Administrative Fee Rate (%) (1)	Net Mortgage Loan Rate (%)	Monthly Debt Service ($) (2)	Annual Debt Service ($)	Companion Loan Monthly Debt Service ($)	Companion Loan Annual Debt Service ($)	Amortization Type	Interest Accrual Method	Seasoning (Mos.)
1	Loan	8, 9, 10, 11, 12	CGMRC	CGMRC	Illinois Center	4.4950%	0.0118%	4.4833%	506,388.26	6,076,659.12	810,221.23	9,722,654.76	Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
1.01	Property				111 East Wacker
1.02	Property				233 North Michigan Avenue
2	Loan	8, 13, 14, 15, 16	GSMC	GSMC	Hammons Hotel Portfolio	4.9535%	0.0118%	4.9418%	533,983.34	6,407,800.08	805,246.88	9,662,962.56	Amortizing	Actual/360	0
2.01	Property	17			Embassy Suites Concord, NC
2.02	Property				Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN
2.03	Property				Embassy Suites Norman, OK
2.04	Property	15			Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX
2.05	Property	15, 18			Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ
2.06	Property				Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL
2.07	Property	15			Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO
3	Loan	19, 20	CGMRC	CGMRC	The Decoration & Design Building	4.1100%	0.0118%	4.0983%	314,456.12	3,773,473.44	483,778.65	5,805,343.80	Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
4	Loan	21	GSMC	GSMC	Hamilton Landing	4.3400%	0.0218%	4.3183%	220,013.89	2,640,166.68			Interest Only	Actual/360	1
5	Loan	8, 22, 23	GSMC	GSMC	Courtyard Sunnyvale	4.7230%	0.0218%	4.7013%	211,128.58	2,533,542.96			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	0
6	Loan	8, 24, 25	RMF	RMF	Somerset Park Apartments	4.5500%	0.0193%	4.5308%	140,318.00	1,683,815.97	551,661.17	6,619,934.03	Interest Only	Actual/360	2
7	Loan	8, 26, 27	RMF	RMF	Greylyn Business Park	4.8410%	0.0118%	4.8293%	180,463.08	2,165,556.91			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	2
8	Loan	8, 28	GSMC	GSMC	Pavilion Jenkintown	4.2705%	0.0118%	4.2588%	154,205.12	1,850,461.44			Amortizing	Actual/360	1
9	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	University Place	4.4200%	0.0118%	4.4083%	140,544.04	1,686,528.48			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	0
10	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio	4.6200%	0.0118%	4.6083%	133,837.27	1,606,047.24			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
10.01	Property				Dale Avenue Roanoke
10.02	Property				Plantation Road Walmart
10.03	Property				Walmart Orange Avenue
11	Loan	8, 29	CGMRC	CGMRC	Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio	4.5100%	0.0318%	4.4783%	106,528.73	1,278,344.76			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
11.01	Property				Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills
11.02	Property				Compass Self Storage Novi
11.03	Property				Compass Self Storage Madison Heights
12	Loan	30	GSMC	GSMC	Mix at Midtown	4.3190%	0.0118%	4.3073%	96,717.61	1,160,611.32			Amortizing	Actual/360	0
13	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Red Dot Storage Portfolio	4.5600%	0.0318%	4.5283%	81,641.06	979,692.72			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
13.01	Property				Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL
13.02	Property				Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL
13.03	Property				Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL
13.04	Property				Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL
13.05	Property				Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI
13.06	Property				Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL
13.07	Property				Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI
13.08	Property				Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL
13.09	Property				Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL
14	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Stadium Plaza	4.8500%	0.0393%	4.8108%	81,792.23	981,506.76			Amortizing	Actual/360	1
15	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Houston Hotel Portfolio	4.7100%	0.0118%	4.6983%	72,693.46	872,321.52			Amortizing	Actual/360	0
15.01	Property				Holiday Inn Express West Road
15.02	Property				Hampton Inn Port Arthur
16	Loan		RMF	RMF	Courtyard at Cedar Hills	4.6300%	0.0118%	4.6183%	50,854.98	610,259.72			Interest Only	Actual/360	1
17	Loan	31	GSMC	GSMC	Peckham Square	4.2385%	0.0118%	4.2268%	61,162.73	733,952.76			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
18	Loan	32, 33	CGMRC	CGMRC	Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center	4.9000%	0.0593%	4.8408%	62,095.03	745,140.36			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
18.01	Property	33			Mason Town House
18.02	Property	33			Park View Business Center
19	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	Dover Marketplace	4.5475%	0.0518%	4.4958%	57,320.05	687,840.60			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
20	Loan	34, 35	RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Lanier Crossing Shopping Center	5.0100%	0.0118%	4.9983%	60,192.49	722,309.88			Amortizing	Actual/360	0
21	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Waterway Shoppes II	4.6700%	0.0118%	4.6583%	56,851.98	682,223.76			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	2
22	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Avenue District Apartments	4.2970%	0.0518%	4.2453%	52,437.70	629,252.40			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	0
23	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	University Retail Portfolio	4.9200%	0.0118%	4.9083%	55,034.83	660,417.96			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	0
23.01	Property				517 Kirkwood Avenue
23.02	Property	36			501 East Green Street
23.03	Property				1801 West Tennessee Street
24	Loan		RMF	RMF	Carrollwood Village Shoppes	4.8200%	0.0118%	4.8083%	54,033.65	648,403.80			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
25	Loan		KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Plaza El Toro	4.7200%	0.0118%	4.7083%	51,984.06	623,808.72			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
26	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Barclay Village	4.4495%	0.0518%	4.3978%	36,842.27	442,107.24			Interest Only	Actual/360	1
27	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Plantation	4.9500%	0.0118%	4.9383%	50,601.40	607,216.80			Amortizing	Actual/360	0
28	Loan	37	GSMC	GSMC	Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar	4.4340%	0.0118%	4.4223%	46,506.35	558,076.20			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	0
29	Loan		RMF	RMF	Riverwalk Center	4.7300%	0.0118%	4.7183%	47,360.27	568,323.24			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
30	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Premiere Building	4.2700%	0.0118%	4.2583%	32,469.79	389,637.48			Interest Only	Actual/360	1
31	Loan	8, 38	CGMRC	CGMRC	TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio	4.5500%	0.0118%	4.5383%	45,869.45	550,433.40			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
31.01	Property				Keystone
31.02	Property				Park 100
32	Loan	8, 39, 40	CGMRC	CGMRC	Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky	4.2900%	0.0118%	4.2783%	41,025.61	492,307.32			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
33	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Anderson Oaks	4.4615%	0.0118%	4.4498%	41,360.82	496,329.84			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	0

A-5

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Mortgage Loan Rate (%)	Administrative Fee Rate (%) (1)	Net Mortgage Loan Rate (%)	Monthly Debt Service ($) (2)	Annual Debt Service ($)	Companion Loan Monthly Debt Service ($)	Companion Loan Annual Debt Service ($)	Amortization Type	Interest Accrual Method	Seasoning (Mos.)
34	Loan	41	CGMRC	CGMRC	Easy Stop Storage Portfolio	4.8800%	0.0118%	4.8683%	43,419.96	521,039.52			Amortizing	Actual/360	0
34.01	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop
34.02	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop
34.03	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial
35	Loan	42, 43	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Scott’s Edge Apartments	4.6900%	0.0393%	4.6508%	42,220.01	506,640.12			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	0
36	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Solomon CVS Portfolio	4.8500%	0.0118%	4.8383%	46,070.72	552,848.64			Amortizing	Actual/360	0
36.01	Property				CVS Brandon
36.02	Property				CVS Paris
36.03	Property				CVS Plano
37	Loan	8	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Westgate Plaza	4.7200%	0.0118%	4.7083%	40,027.73	480,332.76			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
38	Loan	8, 44	CGMRC	CGMRC	Residence Inn Southern Pines	4.5300%	0.0118%	4.5183%	37,372.50	448,470.00			Amortizing	Actual/360	1
39	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Imperial Landing Apartments	4.7400%	0.0793%	4.6608%	38,036.27	456,435.24			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	0
40	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Corporate Place	4.5100%	0.0118%	4.4983%	35,572.99	426,875.88			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
41	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Bricktown Shopping Center	4.5700%	0.0118%	4.5583%	35,759.71	429,116.52			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
42	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt John’s Creek	4.9500%	0.0118%	4.9383%	37,097.01	445,164.12			Amortizing	Actual/360	0
43	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Place Rogers	4.9500%	0.0118%	4.9383%	36,776.75	441,321.00			Amortizing	Actual/360	0
44	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	AR&C Storage	4.4400%	0.0118%	4.4283%	33,206.35	398,476.20			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	2
45	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages	4.6500%	0.0118%	4.6383%	36,120.37	433,444.44			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
46	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Renaissance Faire I	4.6550%	0.0118%	4.6433%	32,504.00	390,048.00			Amortizing	Actual/360	1
47	Loan		RMF	RMF	Cottages at White Oak	5.0200%	0.0693%	4.9508%	30,399.52	364,794.24			Amortizing	Actual/360	2
48	Loan	45	GSMC	GSMC	Village Square Shopping Center	4.4290%	0.0118%	4.4173%	28,138.62	337,663.44			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	2
49	Loan		RMF	RMF	Northstone Apartments	4.5900%	0.0118%	4.5783%	28,162.58	337,950.96			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
50	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Willow Park Apartments	4.4700%	0.0593%	4.4108%	27,264.83	327,177.96			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
51	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Cherry Creek	4.6900%	0.0118%	4.6783%	26,937.92	323,255.04			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
52	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Glenville Target Center	4.4800%	0.0118%	4.4683%	24,769.38	297,232.56			Amortizing	Actual/360	1
53	Loan	8, 46	RMF	RMF	Glades Tower II	5.3600%	0.0118%	5.3483%	24,038.57	288,462.84			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
54	Loan	47	RMF	RMF	Maximum Self Storage	4.7000%	0.0118%	4.6883%	22,171.77	266,061.24			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	0
55	Loan	8, 48	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Sonora Crossroads	5.0100%	0.0518%	4.9583%	21,631.68	259,580.16			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
56	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Albertson’s Retail Shops	4.5800%	0.0118%	4.5683%	20,457.99	245,495.88			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	2
57	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	210 Bedford Avenue	4.6200%	0.0118%	4.6083%	19,269.01	231,228.12			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	1
58	Loan		RMF	RMF	Capital Clifton Park Self Storage	4.7800%	0.0118%	4.7683%	19,263.22	231,158.64			Amortizing	Actual/360	1
59	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Hunters Pointe	4.6840%	0.0518%	4.6323%	17,601.00	211,212.00			Amortizing	Actual/360	2
60	Loan	49	GSMC	GSMC	AkzoNobel Coatings	4.5840%	0.0793%	4.5048%	16,374.04	196,488.48			Amortizing	Actual/360	1
61	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	4238 West Hundred Road	4.2425%	0.0118%	4.2308%	14,926.88	179,122.56			Amortizing	Actual/360	1
62	Loan	50, 51	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)	4.8800%	0.0118%	4.8683%	11,824.00	141,888.00			Amortizing	Actual/360	1
63	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Gardens of Victoria	4.8200%	0.0118%	4.8083%	10,550.37	126,604.44			Interest Only, Then Amortizing	Actual/360	0
64	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Woodview Commons	4.4160%	0.0518%	4.3643%	8,027.30	96,327.60			Amortizing	Actual/360	0

A-6

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Original Interest-Only Period (Mos.)	Remaining Interest- Only Period (Mos.)	Original Term To Maturity (Mos.)	Remaining Term To Maturity  (Mos.)	Original Amortization Term (Mos.)	Remaining Amortization Term (Mos.)	Origination Date	Due Date	First Due Date	Last IO Due Date	First P&I Due Date	Maturity Date
1	Loan	8, 9, 10, 11, 12	CGMRC	CGMRC	Illinois Center	60	59	120	119	360	360	8/4/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2020	9/6/2020	8/6/2025
1.01	Property				111 East Wacker
1.02	Property				233 North Michigan Avenue
2	Loan	8, 13, 14, 15, 16	GSMC	GSMC	Hammons Hotel Portfolio	0	0	120	120	360	360	8/13/2015	6	10/6/2015		10/6/2015	9/6/2025
2.01	Property	17			Embassy Suites Concord, NC
2.02	Property				Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN
2.03	Property				Embassy Suites Norman, OK
2.04	Property	15			Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX
2.05	Property	15, 18			Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ
2.06	Property				Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL
2.07	Property	15			Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO
3	Loan	19, 20	CGMRC	CGMRC	The Decoration & Design Building	69	68	129	128	360	360	7/15/2015	6	9/6/2015	5/6/2021	6/6/2021	5/6/2026
4	Loan	21	GSMC	GSMC	Hamilton Landing	120	119	120	119	0	0	7/22/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2025		8/6/2025
5	Loan	8, 22, 23	GSMC	GSMC	Courtyard Sunnyvale	60	60	120	120	360	360	8/14/2015	6	10/6/2015	9/6/2020	10/6/2020	9/6/2025
6	Loan	8, 24, 25	RMF	RMF	Somerset Park Apartments	120	118	120	118	0	0	6/30/2015	6	8/6/2015	7/6/2025		7/6/2025
7	Loan	8, 26, 27	RMF	RMF	Greylyn Business Park	24	22	120	118	360	360	7/1/2015	6	8/6/2015	7/6/2017	8/6/2017	7/6/2025
8	Loan	8, 28	GSMC	GSMC	Pavilion Jenkintown	0	0	120	119	360	359	8/4/2015	6	9/6/2015		9/6/2015	8/6/2025
9	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	University Place	60	60	120	120	360	360	8/11/2015	6	10/6/2015	9/6/2020	10/6/2020	9/6/2025
10	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio	36	35	120	119	360	360	7/10/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2018	9/6/2018	8/6/2025
10.01	Property				Dale Avenue Roanoke
10.02	Property				Plantation Road Walmart
10.03	Property				Walmart Orange Avenue
11	Loan	8, 29	CGMRC	CGMRC	Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio	36	35	120	119	360	360	7/30/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2018	9/6/2018	8/6/2025
11.01	Property				Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills
11.02	Property				Compass Self Storage Novi
11.03	Property				Compass Self Storage Madison Heights
12	Loan	30	GSMC	GSMC	Mix at Midtown	0	0	120	120	360	360	8/14/2015	6	10/6/2015		10/6/2015	9/6/2025
13	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Red Dot Storage Portfolio	36	35	120	119	360	360	7/17/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2018	9/6/2018	8/6/2025
13.01	Property				Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL
13.02	Property				Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL
13.03	Property				Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL
13.04	Property				Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL
13.05	Property				Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI
13.06	Property				Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL
13.07	Property				Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI
13.08	Property				Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL
13.09	Property				Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL
14	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Stadium Plaza	0	0	120	119	360	359	7/10/2015	6	9/6/2015		9/6/2015	8/6/2025
15	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Houston Hotel Portfolio	0	0	120	120	360	360	8/14/2015	6	10/6/2015		10/6/2015	9/6/2025
15.01	Property				Holiday Inn Express West Road
15.02	Property				Hampton Inn Port Arthur
16	Loan		RMF	RMF	Courtyard at Cedar Hills	120	119	120	119	0	0	7/30/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2025		8/6/2025
17	Loan	31	GSMC	GSMC	Peckham Square	24	23	120	119	360	360	7/31/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2017	9/6/2017	8/6/2025
18	Loan	32, 33	CGMRC	CGMRC	Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center	48	47	120	119	360	360	7/14/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2019	9/6/2019	8/6/2025
18.01	Property	33			Mason Town House
18.02	Property	33			Park View Business Center
19	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	Dover Marketplace	60	59	120	119	360	360	7/15/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2020	9/6/2020	8/6/2025
20	Loan	34, 35	RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Lanier Crossing Shopping Center	0	0	120	120	360	360	8/19/2015	1	10/1/2015		10/1/2015	9/1/2025
21	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Waterway Shoppes II	60	58	120	118	360	360	6/12/2015	6	8/6/2015	7/6/2020	8/6/2020	7/6/2025
22	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Avenue District Apartments	36	36	120	120	360	360	8/11/2015	6	10/6/2015	9/6/2018	10/6/2018	9/6/2025
23	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	University Retail Portfolio	60	60	120	120	360	360	8/13/2015	1	10/1/2015	9/1/2020	10/1/2020	9/1/2025
23.01	Property				517 Kirkwood Avenue
23.02	Property	36			501 East Green Street
23.03	Property				1801 West Tennessee Street
24	Loan		RMF	RMF	Carrollwood Village Shoppes	60	59	120	119	360	360	7/15/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2020	9/6/2020	8/6/2025
25	Loan		KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Plaza El Toro	24	23	120	119	360	360	7/22/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2017	9/6/2017	8/6/2025
26	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Barclay Village	120	119	120	119	0	0	7/14/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2025		8/6/2025
27	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Plantation	0	0	120	120	360	360	8/12/2015	6	10/6/2015		10/6/2015	9/6/2025
28	Loan	37	GSMC	GSMC	Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar	24	24	120	120	360	360	8/11/2015	6	10/6/2015	9/6/2017	10/6/2017	9/6/2025
29	Loan		RMF	RMF	Riverwalk Center	36	35	120	119	360	360	8/10/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2018	9/6/2018	8/6/2025
30	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Premiere Building	120	119	120	119	0	0	7/27/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2025		8/6/2025
31	Loan	8, 38	CGMRC	CGMRC	TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio	24	23	120	119	360	360	7/14/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2017	9/6/2017	8/6/2025
31.01	Property				Keystone
31.02	Property				Park 100
32	Loan	8, 39, 40	CGMRC	CGMRC	Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky	12	11	60	59	360	360	7/31/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2016	9/6/2016	8/6/2020
33	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Anderson Oaks	24	24	120	120	360	360	8/25/2015	6	10/6/2015	9/6/2017	10/6/2017	9/6/2025

A-7

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Original Interest-Only Period (Mos.)	Remaining Interest- Only Period (Mos.)	Original Term To Maturity (Mos.)	Remaining Term To Maturity  (Mos.)	Original Amortization Term (Mos.)	Remaining Amortization Term (Mos.)	Origination Date	Due Date	First Due Date	Last IO Due Date	First P&I Due Date	Maturity Date
34	Loan	41	CGMRC	CGMRC	Easy Stop Storage Portfolio	0	0	120	120	360	360	8/25/2015	6	10/6/2015		10/6/2015	9/6/2025
34.01	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop
34.02	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop
34.03	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial
35	Loan	42, 43	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Scott’s Edge Apartments	36	36	120	120	360	360	8/7/2015	6	10/6/2015	9/6/2018	10/6/2018	9/6/2025
36	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Solomon CVS Portfolio	0	0	120	120	300	300	8/20/2015	6	10/6/2015		10/6/2015	9/6/2025
36.01	Property				CVS Brandon
36.02	Property				CVS Paris
36.03	Property				CVS Plano
37	Loan	8	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Westgate Plaza	24	23	120	119	360	360	7/22/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2017	9/6/2017	8/6/2025
38	Loan	8, 44	CGMRC	CGMRC	Residence Inn Southern Pines	0	0	60	59	360	359	7/17/2015	6	9/6/2015		9/6/2015	8/6/2020
39	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Imperial Landing Apartments	24	24	120	120	360	360	8/17/2015	6	10/6/2015	9/6/2017	10/6/2017	9/6/2025
40	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Corporate Place	24	23	120	119	360	360	7/22/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2017	9/6/2017	8/6/2025
41	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Bricktown Shopping Center	36	35	120	119	360	360	7/29/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2018	9/6/2018	8/6/2025
42	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt John’s Creek	0	0	120	120	360	360	8/12/2015	6	10/6/2015		10/6/2015	9/6/2025
43	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Place Rogers	0	0	120	120	360	360	8/12/2015	6	10/6/2015		10/6/2015	9/6/2025
44	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	AR&C Storage	36	34	120	118	360	360	6/19/2015	6	8/6/2015	7/6/2018	8/6/2018	7/6/2025
45	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages	12	11	120	119	300	300	8/3/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2016	9/6/2016	8/6/2025
46	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Renaissance Faire I	0	0	120	119	360	359	7/31/2015	1	9/1/2015		9/1/2015	8/1/2025
47	Loan		RMF	RMF	Cottages at White Oak	0	0	120	118	360	358	6/29/2015	6	8/6/2015		8/6/2015	7/6/2025
48	Loan	45	GSMC	GSMC	Village Square Shopping Center	24	22	120	118	360	360	7/1/2015	6	8/6/2015	7/6/2017	8/6/2017	7/6/2025
49	Loan		RMF	RMF	Northstone Apartments	60	59	120	119	360	360	8/5/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2020	9/6/2020	8/6/2025
50	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Willow Park Apartments	36	35	120	119	360	360	8/3/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2018	9/6/2018	8/6/2025
51	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Cherry Creek	24	23	120	119	360	360	8/4/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2017	9/6/2017	8/6/2025
52	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Glenville Target Center	0	0	120	119	360	359	7/29/2015	6	9/6/2015		9/6/2015	8/6/2025
53	Loan	8, 46	RMF	RMF	Glades Tower II	36	35	120	119	360	360	7/28/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2018	9/6/2018	8/6/2025
54	Loan	47	RMF	RMF	Maximum Self Storage	60	60	120	120	360	360	8/17/2015	6	10/6/2015	9/6/2020	10/6/2020	9/6/2025
55	Loan	8, 48	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Sonora Crossroads	12	11	120	119	360	360	7/24/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2016	9/6/2016	8/6/2025
56	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Albertson’s Retail Shops	48	46	120	118	360	360	7/7/2015	6	8/6/2015	7/6/2019	8/6/2019	7/6/2025
57	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	210 Bedford Avenue	60	59	120	119	360	360	8/4/2015	6	9/6/2015	8/6/2020	9/6/2020	8/6/2025
58	Loan		RMF	RMF	Capital Clifton Park Self Storage	0	0	120	119	360	359	7/31/2015	6	9/6/2015		9/6/2015	8/6/2025
59	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Hunters Pointe	0	0	120	118	360	358	7/2/2015	6	8/6/2015		8/6/2015	7/6/2025
60	Loan	49	GSMC	GSMC	AkzoNobel Coatings	0	0	120	119	360	359	7/7/2015	6	9/6/2015		9/6/2015	8/6/2025
61	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	4238 West Hundred Road	0	0	120	119	360	359	7/31/2015	6	9/6/2015		9/6/2015	8/6/2025
62	Loan	50, 51	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)	0	0	120	119	360	359	7/17/2015	6	9/6/2015		9/6/2015	8/6/2025
63	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Gardens of Victoria	24	24	120	120	360	360	8/11/2015	6	10/6/2015	9/6/2017	10/6/2017	9/6/2025
64	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Woodview Commons	0	0	120	120	360	360	8/11/2015	6	10/6/2015		10/6/2015	9/6/2025

A-8

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	ARD (Yes / No)	Final Maturity Date	Grace Period- Late Fee	Grace Period- Default	Prepayment Provision (3)	2012 EGI ($)	2012 Expenses ($)	2012 NOI ($)	2013 EGI ($)	2013 Expenses ($)	2013 NOI ($)
1	Loan	8, 9, 10, 11, 12	CGMRC	CGMRC	Illinois Center	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/90_0%/5	N/A	N/A	N/A	47,484,142	28,440,999	19,043,143
1.01	Property				111 East Wacker						N/A	N/A	N/A	22,527,445	14,181,679	8,345,766
1.02	Property				233 North Michigan Avenue						N/A	N/A	N/A	24,956,697	14,259,320	10,697,377
2	Loan	8, 13, 14, 15, 16	GSMC	GSMC	Hammons Hotel Portfolio	No		0	0	Lockout/24_Defeasance/92_0%/4	92,396,782	65,109,709	27,287,073	97,727,685	68,053,370	29,674,315
2.01	Property	17			Embassy Suites Concord, NC						21,507,773	13,910,582	7,597,191	21,993,910	14,947,792	7,046,118
2.02	Property				Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN						15,666,374	9,897,067	5,769,307	17,379,671	10,398,911	6,980,760
2.03	Property				Embassy Suites Norman, OK						13,909,748	10,264,220	3,645,528	15,341,156	11,032,041	4,309,115
2.04	Property	15			Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX						8,783,575	5,670,326	3,113,249	9,352,489	5,915,768	3,436,721
2.05	Property	15, 18			Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ						17,712,531	14,953,077	2,759,454	18,670,171	14,957,743	3,712,428
2.06	Property				Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL						10,612,656	7,283,540	3,329,116	10,310,602	7,438,316	2,872,286
2.07	Property	15			Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO						4,204,125	3,130,897	1,073,228	4,679,686	3,362,799	1,316,887
3	Loan	19, 20	CGMRC	CGMRC	The Decoration & Design Building	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/100_0%/4	40,487,209	20,683,362	19,803,847	43,029,063	21,763,322	21,265,741
4	Loan	21	GSMC	GSMC	Hamilton Landing	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/88_0%/7	11,185,832	4,571,208	6,614,624	11,652,244	4,931,599	6,720,645
5	Loan	8, 22, 23	GSMC	GSMC	Courtyard Sunnyvale	No		0	0	Lockout/24_Defeasance/89_0%/7	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
6	Loan	8, 24, 25	RMF	RMF	Somerset Park Apartments	No		0	0	Lockout/26_Defeasance/87_0%/7	21,408,641	8,411,600	12,997,041	22,505,789	8,883,836	13,621,953
7	Loan	8, 26, 27	RMF	RMF	Greylyn Business Park	No		0	0	Lockout/26_Defeasance/87_0%/7	4,191,193	1,364,472	2,826,721	4,211,799	1,379,080	2,832,719
8	Loan	8, 28	GSMC	GSMC	Pavilion Jenkintown	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	6,365,276	3,136,493	3,228,783	6,153,011	2,911,921	3,241,090
9	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	University Place	No		5	0	Lockout/24_Defeasance/92_0%/4	3,440,478	896,757	2,543,721	3,488,682	927,437	2,561,245
10	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/92_0%/3	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
10.01	Property				Dale Avenue Roanoke						N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
10.02	Property				Plantation Road Walmart						N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
10.03	Property				Walmart Orange Avenue						N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
11	Loan	8, 29	CGMRC	CGMRC	Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	2,237,234	885,858	1,351,376	2,475,444	906,849	1,568,595
11.01	Property				Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills						797,923	309,630	488,293	860,367	302,146	558,220
11.02	Property				Compass Self Storage Novi						720,026	255,696	464,330	819,979	276,442	543,537
11.03	Property				Compass Self Storage Madison Heights						719,286	320,533	398,753	795,099	328,261	466,838
12	Loan	30	GSMC	GSMC	Mix at Midtown	No		0	0	Lockout/23_>YM or 1%/93_0%/4	2,326,053	827,616	1,498,437	2,318,832	808,091	1,510,741
13	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Red Dot Storage Portfolio	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance or >YM or 1%/91_0%/4	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
13.01	Property				Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL						336,020	153,952	182,069	381,403	192,391	189,013
13.02	Property				Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL						N/A	N/A	N/A	335,314	167,327	167,987
13.03	Property				Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL						N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
13.04	Property				Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL						N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
13.05	Property				Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI						N/A	N/A	N/A	227,431	114,018	113,413
13.06	Property				Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL						168,763	94,865	73,898	171,653	91,892	79,761
13.07	Property				Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI						N/A	N/A	N/A	191,270	63,568	127,702
13.08	Property				Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL						N/A	N/A	N/A	122,930	45,178	77,752
13.09	Property				Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL						96,146	45,060	51,086	117,952	53,155	64,796
14	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Stadium Plaza	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance or >YM or 1%/92_0%/3	1,730,609	322,177	1,408,432	1,746,017	357,778	1,388,239
15	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Houston Hotel Portfolio	No		0	0	Lockout/24_Defeasance/93_0%/3	4,681,395	2,945,409	1,735,986	4,813,556	3,031,532	1,782,024
15.01	Property				Holiday Inn Express West Road						2,439,020	1,527,235	911,785	2,741,910	1,553,399	1,188,511
15.02	Property				Hampton Inn Port Arthur						2,242,375	1,418,174	824,201	2,071,646	1,478,133	593,513
16	Loan		RMF	RMF	Courtyard at Cedar Hills	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	1,411,072	693,449	717,623	1,518,987	676,168	842,819
17	Loan	31	GSMC	GSMC	Peckham Square	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	1,436,011	331,202	1,104,809	1,607,662	330,163	1,277,499
18	Loan	32, 33	CGMRC	CGMRC	Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/92_0%/3	1,621,364	624,006	997,358	1,612,511	629,649	982,862
18.01	Property	33			Mason Town House						1,116,445	479,568	636,877	1,193,611	488,350	705,261
18.02	Property	33			Park View Business Center						504,919	144,438	360,481	418,900	141,299	277,601
19	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	Dover Marketplace	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/88_0%/7	1,266,766	244,447	1,022,319	1,299,096	285,631	1,013,465
20	Loan	34, 35	RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Lanier Crossing Shopping Center	No		5	5	Lockout/24_Defeasance/92_0%/4	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
21	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Waterway Shoppes II	No		0	0	Lockout/26_Defeasance/90_0%/4	1,085,517	398,746	686,771	1,245,725	410,487	835,238
22	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Avenue District Apartments	No		0	0	Lockout/23_>YM or 1%/93_0%/4	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
23	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	University Retail Portfolio	No		5	5	Lockout/24_Defeasance/92_0%/4	1,106,364	262,401	843,963	1,127,682	267,959	859,724
23.01	Property				517 Kirkwood Avenue						N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
23.02	Property	36			501 East Green Street						N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
23.03	Property				1801 West Tennessee Street						N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
24	Loan		RMF	RMF	Carrollwood Village Shoppes	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	1,422,823	435,618	987,205	1,494,932	373,460	1,121,472
25	Loan		KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Plaza El Toro	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/92_0%/3	1,092,649	285,468	807,181	1,072,858	278,548	794,311
26	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Barclay Village	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	1,375,867	695,301	680,566	1,453,801	681,015	772,786
27	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Plantation	No		0	0	Lockout/24_Defeasance/92_0%/4	3,429,833	2,629,887	799,946	3,844,303	2,835,112	1,009,191
28	Loan	37	GSMC	GSMC	Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar	No		0	0	Lockout/24_Defeasance/92_0%/4	4,289,069	3,110,735	1,178,334	4,413,774	3,327,910	1,085,864
29	Loan		RMF	RMF	Riverwalk Center	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	N/A	N/A	N/A	1,072,947	328,189	744,758
30	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Premiere Building	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	2,080,554	1,058,569	1,021,985	2,152,282	1,055,019	1,097,263
31iui	Loan	8, 38	CGMRC	CGMRC	TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	3,723,186	2,482,141	1,241,045	3,566,899	2,460,428	1,106,471
31.01	Property				Keystone						2,125,415	1,290,714	834,701	1,977,485	1,213,163	764,322
31.02	Property				Park 100						1,597,771	1,191,427	406,344	1,589,414	1,247,265	342,149
32	Loan	8, 39, 40	CGMRC	CGMRC	Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky	No		0	0	Lockout/25_>YM or 1%/31_0%/4	3,046,873	1,787,482	1,259,391	3,158,185	1,811,188	1,346,997
33	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Anderson Oaks	No		0	0	Lockout/24_Defeasance/91_0%/5	N/A	N/A	N/A	909,874	622,770	287,105

A-9

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A  

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	ARD (Yes / No)	Final Maturity Date	Grace Period- Late Fee	Grace Period- Default	Prepayment Provision (3)	2012 EGI ($)	2012 Expenses ($)	2012 NOI ($)	2013 EGI ($)	2013 Expenses ($)	2013 NOI ($)
34	Loan	41	CGMRC	CGMRC	Easy Stop Storage Portfolio	No		0	0	Lockout/24_Defeasance/92_0%/4	844,948	270,309	574,639	1,120,742	346,802	773,940
34.01	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop						402,786	131,756	271,030	553,097	171,628	381,469
34.02	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop						328,669	95,859	232,810	439,129	143,365	295,764
34.03	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial						113,493	42,694	70,799	128,516	31,809	96,707
35	Loan	42, 43	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Scott’s Edge Apartments	No		0	0	Lockout/24_Defeasance/93_0%/3	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
36	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Solomon CVS Portfolio	No		0	0	Lockout/24_Defeasance/92_0%/4	828,034	8,430	819,604	828,034	14,007	814,027
36.01	Property				CVS Brandon						362,188	1,461	360,727	362,188	11,272	350,916
36.02	Property				CVS Paris						285,646	1,463	284,183	285,646	1,396	284,250
36.03	Property				CVS Plano						180,200	5,506	174,694	180,200	1,339	178,861
37	Loan	8	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Westgate Plaza	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/92_0%/3	992,142	426,918	565,224	1,390,529	500,212	890,318
38	Loan	8, 44	CGMRC	CGMRC	Residence Inn Southern Pines	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/30_0%/5	2,317,461	1,469,932	847,529	2,326,807	1,395,373	931,434
39	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Imperial Landing Apartments	No		0	0	Lockout/24_Defeasance/93_0%/3	1,738,775	1,021,805	716,970	N/A	N/A	N/A
40	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Corporate Place	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/92_0%/3	N/A	N/A	N/A	1,610,854	719,068	891,786
41	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Bricktown Shopping Center	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	1,263,740	580,943	682,797	1,366,679	654,016	712,663
42	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt John’s Creek	No		0	0	Lockout/24_Defeasance/92_0%/4	2,468,016	1,838,023	629,993	2,745,670	2,052,609	693,061
43	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Place Rogers	No		0	0	Lockout/24_Defeasance/92_0%/4	2,366,137	1,708,417	657,720	2,423,977	1,740,061	683,916
44	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	AR&C Storage	No		0	0	Lockout/26_>YM or 1%/90_0%/4	557,856	346,411	211,445	720,000	359,235	360,765
45	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	1,385,941	929,055	456,886	1,761,918	1,028,401	733,517
46	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Renaissance Faire I	No		5	5	Lockout/25_Defeasance/90_0%/5	1,219,067	589,124	629,943	1,308,831	660,722	648,109
47	Loan		RMF	RMF	Cottages at White Oak	No		0	0	Lockout/26_Defeasance/90_0%/4	705,995	193,277	512,718	700,874	170,578	530,297
48	Loan	45	GSMC	GSMC	Village Square Shopping Center	No		0	0	Lockout/26_Defeasance/90_0%/4	730,794	286,189	444,605	741,742	253,727	488,015
49	Loan		RMF	RMF	Northstone Apartments	No		0	0	Lockout/24_>YM or 1%/92_0%/4	1,000,359	563,894	436,465	1,041,703	565,663	476,040
50	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Willow Park Apartments	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	1,121,081	601,129	519,952	1,072,846	608,847	463,999
51	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Cherry Creek	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	1,001,361	474,563	526,798	996,588	525,634	470,954
52	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Glenville Target Center	No		0	0	Lockout/25_>YM or 1%/91_0%/4	N/A	N/A	N/A	101,953	101,445	508
53	Loan	8, 46	RMF	RMF	Glades Tower II	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	418,923	138,622	280,301	433,748	149,853	283,896
54	Loan	47	RMF	RMF	Maximum Self Storage	No		0	0	Lockout/24_Defeasance/92_0%/4	553,028	193,799	359,229	553,958	208,244	345,714
55	Loan	8, 48	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Sonora Crossroads	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	601,438	140,983	460,455	522,672	154,744	367,928
56	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Albertson’s Retail Shops	No		0	0	Lockout/26_Defeasance/90_0%/4	436,331	73,122	363,209	443,577	71,371	372,206
57	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	210 Bedford Avenue	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
58	Loan		RMF	RMF	Capital Clifton Park Self Storage	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	459,567	112,969	346,598	469,093	117,373	351,720
59	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Hunters Pointe	No		0	0	Lockout/23_>YM or 1%/93_0%/4	474,972	260,214	214,758	538,094	267,740	270,354
60	Loan	49	GSMC	GSMC	AkzoNobel Coatings	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/91_0%/4	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
61	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	4238 West Hundred Road	No		0	0	Lockout/11_>YM or 1%/105_0%/4	285,000	4,319	280,681	285,000	4,489	280,511
62	Loan	50, 51	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)	No		0	0	Lockout/25_Defeasance/92_0%/3	330,279	88,286	241,993	330,003	87,410	242,593
63	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Gardens of Victoria	No		0	0	Lockout/24_Defeasance/93_0%/3	500,910	278,981	221,929	542,793	295,104	247,689
64	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Woodview Commons	No		0	0	Lockout/23_>YM or 1%/93_0%/4	258,111	136,264	121,848	274,884	132,897	141,986

A-10

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A  

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	2014 EGI ($)	2014 Expenses ($)	2014 NOI ($)	Most Recent EGI (if past 2014) ($)	Most Recent Expenses (if past 2014) ($)	Most Recent NOI (if past 2014) ($)	Most Recent NOI Date (if past 2014)	Most Recent # of months	Most Recent Description	Underwritten EGI ($)
1	Loan	8, 9, 10, 11, 12	CGMRC	CGMRC	Illinois Center	43,196,152	28,850,838	14,345,314	43,942,782	29,089,569	14,853,213	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	53,299,974
1.01	Property				111 East Wacker	20,471,737	14,331,413	6,140,324	21,274,645	14,886,558	6,388,088	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	28,328,615
1.02	Property				233 North Michigan Avenue	22,724,414	14,519,425	8,204,989	22,668,137	14,203,011	8,465,126	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	24,971,359
2	Loan	8, 13, 14, 15, 16	GSMC	GSMC	Hammons Hotel Portfolio	102,778,243	72,019,072	30,759,171	108,129,754	73,864,423	34,265,331	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	104,481,960
2.01	Property	17			Embassy Suites Concord, NC	23,514,114	15,643,129	7,870,985	24,492,975	16,068,835	8,424,140	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	24,560,400
2.02	Property				Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN	18,348,896	11,782,797	6,566,099	18,643,322	12,103,907	6,539,415	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	18,694,613
2.03	Property				Embassy Suites Norman, OK	15,784,351	11,447,393	4,336,958	15,944,720	11,193,839	4,750,881	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	15,988,462
2.04	Property	15			Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX	9,643,192	6,209,620	3,433,572	9,848,311	6,234,058	3,614,253	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	9,875,219
2.05	Property	15, 18			Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ	19,550,208	15,618,805	3,931,403	23,484,205	17,058,085	6,426,120	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	19,603,815
2.06	Property				Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL	10,909,534	7,690,323	3,219,211	10,765,161	7,621,411	3,143,750	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	10,794,777
2.07	Property	15			Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO	5,027,948	3,627,005	1,400,943	4,951,060	3,584,288	1,366,772	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	4,964,674
3	Loan	19, 20	CGMRC	CGMRC	The Decoration & Design Building	45,749,938	23,313,814	22,436,124	46,234,389	23,108,904	23,125,485	2/28/2015	12	Trailing 12	48,377,193
4	Loan	21	GSMC	GSMC	Hamilton Landing	8,297,734	4,820,205	3,477,529	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Not Available	11,676,830
5	Loan	8, 22, 23	GSMC	GSMC	Courtyard Sunnyvale	N/A	N/A	N/A	7,100,592	3,629,817	3,470,775	7/31/2015	9	Trailing 9	10,102,077
6	Loan	8, 24, 25	RMF	RMF	Somerset Park Apartments	23,455,767	9,365,697	14,090,070	24,065,452	9,317,835	14,747,617	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	24,789,739
7	Loan	8, 26, 27	RMF	RMF	Greylyn Business Park	4,408,922	1,441,133	2,967,789	4,475,454	1,067,133	3,408,321	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	5,065,008
8	Loan	8, 28	GSMC	GSMC	Pavilion Jenkintown	6,073,561	3,113,779	2,959,782	6,224,688	3,147,351	3,077,337	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	6,486,175
9	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	University Place	3,483,528	1,012,127	2,471,401	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Not Available	3,878,502
10	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Not Available	2,246,348
10.01	Property				Dale Avenue Roanoke	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Not Available	778,921
10.02	Property				Plantation Road Walmart	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Not Available	738,340
10.03	Property				Walmart Orange Avenue	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Not Available	729,087
11	Loan	8, 29	CGMRC	CGMRC	Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio	2,670,796	934,510	1,736,286	2,761,566	935,082	1,826,484	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	2,761,566
11.01	Property				Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills	932,682	308,070	624,613	972,212	307,804	664,409	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	972,212
11.02	Property				Compass Self Storage Novi	883,659	284,768	598,891	924,549	284,246	640,303	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	924,549
11.03	Property				Compass Self Storage Madison Heights	854,454	341,672	512,782	864,805	343,033	521,772	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	864,805
12	Loan	30	GSMC	GSMC	Mix at Midtown	2,546,405	894,560	1,651,845	2,791,654	926,797	1,864,857	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	2,665,498
13	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Red Dot Storage Portfolio	N/A	N/A	N/A	2,419,776	918,098	1,501,679	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	2,409,472
13.01	Property				Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL	378,891	110,221	268,670	394,480	132,206	262,274	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	394,480
13.02	Property				Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL	339,306	132,381	206,926	355,047	128,593	226,454	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	355,047
13.03	Property				Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL	N/A	N/A	N/A	413,585	141,085	272,500	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	413,585
13.04	Property				Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL	N/A	N/A	N/A	321,925	146,275	175,650	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	321,925
13.05	Property				Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI	260,984	66,595	194,389	261,785	100,285	161,500	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	255,367
13.06	Property				Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL	208,086	77,797	130,289	213,074	67,207	145,867	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	213,074
13.07	Property				Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI	201,878	70,196	131,682	204,202	84,034	120,168	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	200,316
13.08	Property				Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL	131,880	55,904	75,976	131,312	58,484	72,828	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	131,312
13.09	Property				Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL	116,388	58,885	57,503	124,366	59,928	64,438	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	124,366
14	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Stadium Plaza	1,812,483	422,324	1,390,159	1,865,538	399,540	1,465,998	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,771,237
15	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Houston Hotel Portfolio	5,140,665	3,292,539	1,848,126	5,164,400	3,224,549	1,939,851	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	5,158,592
15.01	Property				Holiday Inn Express West Road	2,987,551	1,758,749	1,228,802	2,836,575	1,696,893	1,139,682	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	2,834,805
15.02	Property				Hampton Inn Port Arthur	2,153,114	1,533,790	619,324	2,327,824	1,527,656	800,168	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	2,323,787
16	Loan		RMF	RMF	Courtyard at Cedar Hills	1,665,847	607,195	1,058,653	1,722,131	625,530	1,096,601	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,747,558
17	Loan	31	GSMC	GSMC	Peckham Square	1,581,567	310,444	1,271,122	1,619,396	272,258	1,347,138	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,698,154
18	Loan	32, 33	CGMRC	CGMRC	Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center	1,825,899	670,095	1,155,804	1,895,910	685,338	1,210,572	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,750,588
18.01	Property	33			Mason Town House	1,315,893	512,631	803,262	1,367,396	526,174	841,222	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,224,577
18.02	Property	33			Park View Business Center	510,006	157,464	352,542	528,514	159,164	369,350	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	526,011
19	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	Dover Marketplace	1,333,770	287,744	1,046,027	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Not Available	1,378,039
20	Loan	34, 35	RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Lanier Crossing Shopping Center	1,163,504	341,272	822,232	1,232,344	263,794	968,550	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,404,078
21	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Waterway Shoppes II	1,384,056	421,504	962,552	1,399,951	418,516	981,435	3/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,517,812
22	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Avenue District Apartments	1,577,892	562,916	1,014,976	1,656,169	599,515	1,056,654	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,687,187
23	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	University Retail Portfolio	1,152,345	276,862	875,483	1,157,212	265,106	892,105	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,179,147
23.01	Property				517 Kirkwood Avenue	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Not Available	554,489
23.02	Property	36			501 East Green Street	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Not Available	266,612
23.03	Property				1801 West Tennessee Street	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Not Available	358,045
24	Loan		RMF	RMF	Carrollwood Village Shoppes	1,397,410	306,614	1,090,796	1,259,453	291,419	968,034	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,358,661
25	Loan		KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Plaza El Toro	1,212,856	262,824	950,032	1,216,903	270,055	946,848	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,219,193
26	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Barclay Village	1,572,260	731,813	840,447	1,630,251	707,320	922,931	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,662,615
27	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Plantation	4,239,368	3,121,709	1,117,659	4,510,481	3,185,268	1,325,213	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	4,510,481
28	Loan	37	GSMC	GSMC	Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar	4,725,559	3,500,118	1,225,441	4,724,121	3,509,692	1,214,429	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	4,677,855
29	Loan		RMF	RMF	Riverwalk Center	1,104,830	337,748	767,083	1,116,270	341,677	774,593	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,257,661
30	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Premiere Building	2,017,333	1,085,523	931,810	2,100,009	1,078,418	1,021,591	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	2,309,659
31	Loan	8, 38	CGMRC	CGMRC	TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio	3,944,524	2,655,574	1,288,950	4,288,354	2,764,470	1,523,884	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	4,288,354
31.01	Property				Keystone	2,137,925	1,332,244	805,681	2,330,810	1,372,210	958,600	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	2,330,810
31.02	Property				Park 100	1,806,599	1,323,330	483,269	1,957,544	1,392,260	565,284	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,957,544
32	Loan	8, 39, 40	CGMRC	CGMRC	Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky	3,235,179	1,890,770	1,344,409	3,365,603	1,902,226	1,463,377	3/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	3,256,221
33	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Anderson Oaks	992,879	602,297	390,582	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Not Available	1,327,670

A-11

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A  

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	2014 EGI ($)	2014 Expenses ($)	2014 NOI ($)	Most Recent EGI (if past 2014) ($)	Most Recent Expenses (if past 2014) ($)	Most Recent NOI (if past 2014) ($)	Most Recent NOI Date (if past 2014)	Most Recent # of months	Most Recent Description	Underwritten EGI ($)
34	Loan	41	CGMRC	CGMRC	Easy Stop Storage Portfolio	1,222,481	423,123	799,358	1,222,800	468,392	754,408	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,222,800
34.01	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop	603,721	206,519	397,203	608,472	220,151	388,321	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	608,472
34.02	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop	474,514	162,317	312,197	461,995	171,502	290,493	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	461,995
34.03	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial	144,246	54,288	89,958	152,333	76,739	75,594	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	152,333
35	Loan	42, 43	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Scott’s Edge Apartments	N/A	N/A	N/A	1,164,059	381,503	782,556	6/30/2015	1	Annualized	1,151,440
36	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Solomon CVS Portfolio	828,034	32,080	795,954	828,034	6,090	821,943	Various	Various	Annualized	797,374
36.01	Property				CVS Brandon	362,188	22,892	339,296	362,188	1,431	360,757	8/31/2015	8	Annualized	352,228
36.02	Property				CVS Paris	285,646	2,985	282,661	285,646	3,645	282,001	8/31/2015	8	Annualized	273,506
36.03	Property				CVS Plano	180,200	6,203	173,997	180,200	1,014	179,186	7/31/2015	7	Annualized	171,641
37	Loan	8	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Westgate Plaza	1,010,028	528,325	481,703	1,075,085	565,924	509,161	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,345,796
38	Loan	8, 44	CGMRC	CGMRC	Residence Inn Southern Pines	2,387,557	1,493,772	893,785	2,468,043	1,522,789	945,254	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	2,468,043
39	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Imperial Landing Apartments	1,902,365	1,166,048	736,317	1,971,854	1,189,831	782,023	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,935,649
40	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Corporate Place	1,496,970	724,906	772,064	1,501,141	722,395	778,746	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,604,230
41	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Bricktown Shopping Center	1,380,134	672,161	707,973	1,355,464	664,431	691,033	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,334,669
42	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt John’s Creek	3,058,265	2,229,537	828,728	3,191,186	2,231,108	960,078	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	3,191,186
43	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Place Rogers	2,756,182	1,926,203	829,979	2,905,761	1,997,909	907,852	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	2,905,761
44	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	AR&C Storage	860,643	457,167	403,476	956,379	422,338	534,041	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	956,379
45	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages	1,985,138	1,150,461	834,677	2,235,228	1,252,480	982,748	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	2,236,904
46	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Renaissance Faire I	1,363,042	734,109	628,933	1,405,537	738,467	667,070	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,361,345
47	Loan		RMF	RMF	Cottages at White Oak	745,822	154,989	590,833	727,372	183,504	543,868	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	695,229
48	Loan	45	GSMC	GSMC	Village Square Shopping Center	760,428	258,002	502,426	787,499	262,437	525,062	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	810,459
49	Loan		RMF	RMF	Northstone Apartments	1,068,986	571,185	497,801	1,113,664	598,935	514,730	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,154,982
50	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Willow Park Apartments	1,105,431	567,201	538,230	1,083,713	573,612	510,101	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	1,083,713
51	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Cherry Creek	1,027,353	554,566	472,787	1,083,941	553,075	530,865	6/30/2015	6	Annualized	1,128,192
52	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Glenville Target Center	427,203	249,223	177,980	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Not Available	780,109
53	Loan	8, 46	RMF	RMF	Glades Tower II	489,700	153,781	335,920	538,756	154,231	384,525	3/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	718,296
54	Loan	47	RMF	RMF	Maximum Self Storage	583,377	227,431	355,945	589,706	215,647	374,059	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	618,539
55	Loan	8, 48	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Sonora Crossroads	515,670	145,426	370,244	501,507	143,260	358,247	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	521,111
56	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Albertson’s Retail Shops	439,042	72,401	366,641	442,979	72,244	370,735	4/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	463,931
57	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	210 Bedford Avenue	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Not Available	300,830
58	Loan		RMF	RMF	Capital Clifton Park Self Storage	475,746	124,349	351,398	500,983	130,905	370,078	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	500,935
59	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Hunters Pointe	544,448	266,296	278,152	558,396	269,981	288,415	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	575,402
60	Loan	49	GSMC	GSMC	AkzoNobel Coatings	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Not Available	372,553
61	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	4238 West Hundred Road	285,000	5,005	279,995	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Not Available	281,438
62	Loan	50, 51	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)	260,185	95,802	164,383	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	Not Available	329,094
63	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Gardens of Victoria	553,751	316,010	237,741	551,143	311,681	239,462	5/31/2015	12	Trailing 12	551,143
64	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Woodview Commons	279,373	137,436	141,937	283,776	141,183	142,593	6/30/2015	12	Trailing 12	283,399

A-12

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A  

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Underwritten Expenses ($)	Underwritten Net Operating Income ($)	Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Operating Income (%)	Underwritten Replacement / FF&E Reserve ($)	Underwritten TI / LC ($)	Underwritten Net Cash Flow ($)	Underwritten NCF DSCR (x) (4)	Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Cash Flow (%)	Appraised Value ($)	Appraisal Date
1	Loan	8, 9, 10, 11, 12	CGMRC	CGMRC	Illinois Center	29,752,726	23,547,248	9.1%	418,378	1,795,184	21,333,686	1.35	8.2%	390,000,000	6/24/2015
1.01	Property				111 East Wacker	15,154,544	13,174,071		203,692	929,710	12,040,669			220,114,841	6/24/2015
1.02	Property				233 North Michigan Avenue	14,598,182	10,373,177		214,685	865,474	9,293,017			169,885,159	6/24/2015
2	Loan	8, 13, 14, 15, 16	GSMC	GSMC	Hammons Hotel Portfolio	73,369,148	31,112,812	12.4%	4,179,278	0	26,933,534	1.68	10.7%	367,320,502	Various
2.01	Property	17			Embassy Suites Concord, NC	16,285,563	8,274,837		982,416	0	7,292,421			89,300,000	6/11/2015
2.02	Property				Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN	12,240,655	6,453,957		747,785	0	5,706,173			72,500,000	6/9/2015
2.03	Property				Embassy Suites Norman, OK	11,403,522	4,584,940		639,538	0	3,945,402			54,600,000	6/11/2015
2.04	Property	15			Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX	6,309,439	3,565,780		395,009	0	3,170,771			43,344,314	6/11/2015
2.05	Property	15, 18			Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ	15,773,194	3,830,620		784,153	0	3,046,468			55,200,000	6/8/2015
2.06	Property				Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL	7,722,079	3,072,698		431,791	0	2,640,907			36,200,000	6/9/2015
2.07	Property	15			Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO	3,634,695	1,329,979		198,587	0	1,131,392			16,176,188	6/10/2015
3	Loan	19, 20	CGMRC	CGMRC	The Decoration & Design Building	25,586,971	22,790,222	13.8%	126,520	588,506	22,075,196	2.30	13.4%	400,000,000	4/1/2015
4	Loan	21	GSMC	GSMC	Hamilton Landing	4,857,675	6,819,155	11.4%	77,207	365,821	6,376,127	2.42	10.6%	84,700,000	7/7/2015
5	Loan	8, 22, 23	GSMC	GSMC	Courtyard Sunnyvale	5,224,946	4,877,131	12.0%	404,083	0	4,473,048	1.77	11.0%	58,000,000	7/7/2015
6	Loan	8, 24, 25	RMF	RMF	Somerset Park Apartments	9,759,082	15,030,657	8.4%	311,640	0	14,719,017	1.77	8.2%	227,500,000	5/20/2015
7	Loan	8, 26, 27	RMF	RMF	Greylyn Business Park	1,355,506	3,709,502	10.4%	142,629	162,079	3,404,794	1.57	9.6%	47,900,000	6/1/2015
8	Loan	8, 28	GSMC	GSMC	Pavilion Jenkintown	3,139,046	3,347,129	10.7%	71,965	267,594	3,007,570	1.63	9.6%	47,100,000	6/10/2015
9	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	University Place	1,022,477	2,856,026	10.2%	47,297	253,518	2,555,211	1.52	9.1%	37,700,000	4/7/2015
10	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio	393,692	1,852,656	7.1%	18,611	0	1,834,045	1.14	7.0%	35,800,000	3/23/2015
10.01	Property				Dale Avenue Roanoke	133,028	645,892		6,168	0	639,725			12,500,000	3/23/2015
10.02	Property				Plantation Road Walmart	128,632	609,708		6,276	0	603,432			11,800,000	3/23/2015
10.03	Property				Walmart Orange Avenue	132,032	597,055		6,168	0	590,888			11,500,000	3/23/2015
11	Loan	8, 29	CGMRC	CGMRC	Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio	935,505	1,826,061	8.7%	31,287	0	1,794,774	1.40	8.5%	28,200,000	Various
11.01	Property				Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills	309,870	662,342		9,730	0	652,612			10,100,000	6/5/2015
11.02	Property				Compass Self Storage Novi	284,783	639,766		10,288	0	629,478			9,700,000	6/4/2015
11.03	Property				Compass Self Storage Madison Heights	340,852	523,953		11,269	0	512,684			8,400,000	6/5/2015
12	Loan	30	GSMC	GSMC	Mix at Midtown	863,634	1,801,864	9.2%	14,580	69,256	1,718,028	1.48	8.8%	28,520,000	7/13/2015
13	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Red Dot Storage Portfolio	989,169	1,420,303	8.9%	41,259	0	1,379,044	1.41	8.6%	21,970,000	Various
13.01	Property				Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL	145,201	249,279		4,765	0	244,514			4,160,000	6/3/2015
13.02	Property				Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL	143,760	211,287		6,075	0	205,212			3,300,000	6/3/2015
13.03	Property				Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL	164,409	249,176		7,412	0	241,764			3,170,000	5/30/2015
13.04	Property				Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL	151,939	169,986		4,150	0	165,836			3,180,000	6/3/2015
13.05	Property				Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI	94,103	161,264		5,578	0	155,686			2,260,000	6/3/2015
13.06	Property				Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL	72,417	140,657		3,000	0	137,657			2,070,000	6/3/2015
13.07	Property				Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI	91,290	109,027		4,588	0	104,439			1,740,000	6/3/2015
13.08	Property				Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL	63,001	68,311		3,150	0	65,161			1,090,000	6/3/2015
13.09	Property				Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL	63,049	61,317		2,541	0	58,776			1,000,000	6/3/2015
14	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Stadium Plaza	333,148	1,438,089	9.3%	19,119	60,392	1,358,579	1.38	8.8%	20,650,000	6/26/2015
15	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Houston Hotel Portfolio	3,343,929	1,814,662	13.0%	206,344	0	1,608,319	1.84	11.5%	21,700,000	5/19/2015
15.01	Property				Holiday Inn Express West Road	1,762,931	1,071,874		113,392	0	958,482			13,300,000	5/19/2015
15.02	Property				Hampton Inn Port Arthur	1,580,999	742,788		92,951	0	649,837			8,400,000	5/19/2015
16	Loan		RMF	RMF	Courtyard at Cedar Hills	672,172	1,075,386	8.3%	39,150	0	1,036,236	1.70	8.0%	20,000,000	6/24/2015
17	Loan	31	GSMC	GSMC	Peckham Square	333,807	1,364,347	11.0%	39,995	112,493	1,211,858	1.65	9.7%	16,800,000	7/7/2015
18	Loan	32, 33	CGMRC	CGMRC	Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center	692,556	1,058,032	9.0%	25,507	27,354	1,005,171	1.35	8.6%	15,600,000	Various
18.01	Property	33			Mason Town House	529,211	695,366		16,250	0	679,116			11,100,000	3/27/2015
18.02	Property	33			Park View Business Center	163,346	362,665		9,257	27,354	326,054			4,500,000	3/25/2015
19	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	Dover Marketplace	338,618	1,039,421	9.2%	17,529	28,133	993,759	1.44	8.8%	15,000,000	5/25/2015
20	Loan	34, 35	RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Lanier Crossing Shopping Center	363,799	1,040,279	9.3%	16,500	66,001	957,777	1.33	8.6%	15,900,000	7/1/2015
21	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Waterway Shoppes II	441,822	1,075,990	9.8%	6,271	66,716	1,003,003	1.47	9.1%	15,250,000	5/1/2015
22	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Avenue District Apartments	732,294	954,893	9.0%	14,750	0	940,144	1.49	8.9%	16,750,000	5/26/2015
23	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	University Retail Portfolio	315,504	863,643	8.3%	4,971	16,572	842,100	1.28	8.1%	14,760,000	Various
23.01	Property				517 Kirkwood Avenue	73,390	481,100		3,139	10,462	467,499			7,000,000	7/7/2015
23.02	Property	36			501 East Green Street	129,472	137,140		708	2,360	134,072			4,000,000	7/10/2015
23.03	Property				1801 West Tennessee Street	112,642	245,403		1,125	3,750	240,529			3,760,000	7/2/2015
24	Loan		RMF	RMF	Carrollwood Village Shoppes	404,494	954,167	9.3%	9,071	57,786	887,310	1.37	8.6%	13,750,000	5/4/2015
25	Loan		KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Plaza El Toro	306,995	912,198	9.1%	15,455	45,321	851,422	1.36	8.5%	15,400,000	6/4/2015
26	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Barclay Village	690,068	972,547	9.9%	51,246	0	921,301	2.08	9.4%	16,800,000	6/11/2015
27	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Plantation	3,195,700	1,314,781	13.9%	180,419	0	1,134,361	1.87	12.0%	14,600,000	5/19/2015
28	Loan	37	GSMC	GSMC	Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar	3,511,522	1,166,333	12.6%	187,114	0	979,218	1.75	10.6%	16,500,000	6/15/2015
29	Loan		RMF	RMF	Riverwalk Center	418,578	839,083	9.2%	5,299	35,324	798,461	1.40	8.8%	12,500,000	5/27/2015
30	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Premiere Building	1,134,723	1,174,936	13.1%	22,377	117,363	1,035,197	2.66	11.5%	17,400,000	5/4/2015
31	Loan	8, 38	CGMRC	CGMRC	TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio	2,854,087	1,434,267	15.9%	171,534	0	1,262,732	2.29	14.0%	13,400,000	6/8/2015
31.01	Property				Keystone	1,422,954	907,856		93,232	0	814,623			8,500,000	6/8/2015
31.02	Property				Park 100	1,431,133	526,411		78,302	0	448,109			4,900,000	6/8/2015
32	Loan	8, 39, 40	CGMRC	CGMRC	Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky	1,976,481	1,279,740	15.4%	130,249	0	1,149,492	2.33	13.8%	14,700,000	4/20/2015
33	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Anderson Oaks	610,079	717,590	8.8%	39,675	0	677,915	1.37	8.3%	11,840,000	7/24/2015

A-13

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A  

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Underwritten Expenses ($)	Underwritten Net Operating Income ($)	Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Operating Income (%)	Underwritten Replacement / FF&E Reserve ($)	Underwritten TI / LC ($)	Underwritten Net Cash Flow ($)	Underwritten NCF DSCR (x) (4)	Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Cash Flow (%)	Appraised Value ($)	Appraisal Date
34	Loan	41	CGMRC	CGMRC	Easy Stop Storage Portfolio	515,562	707,238	8.6%	26,520	0	680,718	1.31	8.3%	11,990,000	5/28/2015
34.01	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop	242,718	365,754		11,949	0	353,805			5,950,000	5/28/2015
34.02	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop	177,669	284,325		9,413	0	274,912			4,900,000	5/28/2015
34.03	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial	95,174	57,159		5,158	0	52,000			1,140,000	5/28/2015
35	Loan	42, 43	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Scott’s Edge Apartments	465,089	686,351	8.4%	14,100	0	672,251	1.33	8.2%	11,200,000	7/9/2015
36	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Solomon CVS Portfolio	35,411	761,963	9.5%	15,069	0	746,894	1.35	9.3%	12,100,000	Various
36.01	Property				CVS Brandon	13,735	338,493		5,390	0	333,103			5,400,000	7/9/2015
36.02	Property				CVS Paris	11,030	262,475		5,092	0	257,384			4,100,000	7/12/2015
36.03	Property				CVS Plano	10,646	160,995		4,588	0	156,407			2,600,000	7/10/2015
37	Loan	8	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Westgate Plaza	557,657	788,139	10.2%	18,478	42,310	727,350	1.51	9.4%	14,240,000	6/4/2015
38	Loan	8, 44	CGMRC	CGMRC	Residence Inn Southern Pines	1,540,859	927,184	12.6%	98,722	0	828,463	1.85	11.3%	11,000,000	6/19/2015
39	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Imperial Landing Apartments	1,244,979	690,671	9.5%	66,000	0	624,671	1.37	8.6%	9,950,000	6/25/2015
40	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Corporate Place	757,920	846,310	12.1%	17,451	88,579	740,280	1.73	10.6%	9,500,000	5/20/2015
41	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Bricktown Shopping Center	619,896	714,773	10.2%	14,584	38,892	661,297	1.54	9.4%	12,150,000	6/10/2015
42	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt John’s Creek	2,249,592	941,594	13.5%	127,647	0	813,947	1.83	11.7%	11,200,000	5/18/2015
43	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Place Rogers	1,982,567	923,194	13.4%	116,230	0	806,963	1.83	11.7%	10,300,000	5/15/2015
44	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	AR&C Storage	415,467	540,912	8.2%	12,212	0	528,700	1.33	8.0%	10,200,000	6/2/2015
45	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages	1,281,508	955,395	14.9%	89,476	0	865,919	2.00	13.5%	10,500,000	6/4/2015
46	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Renaissance Faire I	695,070	666,275	10.6%	45,638	87,766	532,870	1.37	8.5%	9,100,000	5/26/2015
47	Loan		RMF	RMF	Cottages at White Oak	201,185	494,044	8.8%	17,940	0	476,104	1.31	8.4%	8,100,000	5/26/2015
48	Loan	45	GSMC	GSMC	Village Square Shopping Center	265,808	544,651	9.7%	21,563	27,806	495,282	1.47	8.8%	7,480,000	5/12/2015
49	Loan		RMF	RMF	Northstone Apartments	606,837	548,145	10.0%	30,000	0	518,145	1.53	9.4%	9,600,000	5/7/2015
50	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Willow Park Apartments	570,162	513,551	9.5%	53,120	0	460,431	1.41	8.5%	8,500,000	6/11/2015
51	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Cherry Creek	590,280	537,912	10.3%	10,561	52,804	474,549	1.47	9.1%	7,340,000	6/5/2015
52	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Glenville Target Center	306,481	473,628	9.7%	5,342	30,427	437,859	1.47	8.9%	7,660,000	3/19/2015
53	Loan	8, 46	RMF	RMF	Glades Tower II	267,009	451,287	10.5%	4,025	20,126	427,136	1.48	9.9%	7,000,000	3/24/2015
54	Loan	47	RMF	RMF	Maximum Self Storage	233,194	385,344	9.0%	0	0	385,344	1.45	9.0%	5,800,000	6/23/2015
55	Loan	8, 48	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Sonora Crossroads	148,413	372,698	9.3%	6,911	28,204	337,583	1.30	8.4%	6,600,000	7/8/2015
56	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Albertson’s Retail Shops	92,388	371,543	9.3%	3,412	14,784	353,348	1.44	8.8%	6,130,000	5/14/2015
57	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	210 Bedford Avenue	25,470	275,360	7.3%	1,625	7,468	266,266	1.15	7.1%	6,800,000	7/20/2015
58	Loan		RMF	RMF	Capital Clifton Park Self Storage	158,256	342,679	9.3%	10,134	2,000	330,545	1.43	9.0%	5,020,000	5/28/2015
59	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Hunters Pointe	268,488	306,915	9.0%	13,140	0	293,775	1.39	8.7%	4,600,000	5/22/2015
60	Loan	49	GSMC	GSMC	AkzoNobel Coatings	11,177	361,376	11.3%	4,650	7,560	349,166	1.78	10.9%	5,310,000	5/22/2015
61	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	4238 West Hundred Road	7,563	273,875	9.0%	2,223	0	271,652	1.52	9.0%	4,950,000	7/9/2015
62	Loan	50, 51	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)	88,158	240,935	10.8%	2,018	14,870	224,047	1.58	10.0%	4,100,000	7/1/2015
63	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Gardens of Victoria	318,863	232,280	11.6%	17,160	0	215,120	1.70	10.7%	2,675,000	7/1/2015
64	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Woodview Commons	139,240	144,158	9.0%	14,419	0	129,739	1.35	8.1%	2,150,000	5/22/2015

A-14

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A  

Control Number

Loan / Property Flag

Footnotes

Mortgage Loan Seller

Originator

Property Name

As Stabilized Appraised Value ($)

As Stabilized Appraisal Date

Cut-off Date LTV Ratio (%)

LTV Ratio at Maturity (%)

Occupancy (%) (5)

Occupancy Date

ADR ($)

RevPAR ($)

Largest Tenant

Largest Tenant Sq Ft

Largest Tenant Lease Expiration (6)

1

Loan

8, 9, 10, 11, 12

CGMRC

CGMRC

Illinois Center

470,000,000

7/1/2017

66.7%

50.6%

72.3%

NAP

NAP

1.01

Property

111 East Wacker

265,266,604

7/1/2017

79.3%

6/29/2015

NAP

NAP

Bankers Life and Casualty

139,252

8/31/2023

1.02

Property

233 North Michigan Avenue

204,733,396

7/1/2017

65.7%

6/29/2015

NAP

NAP

Department of Health & Human Services (GSA)

184,042

11/30/2020

2

Loan

8, 13, 14, 15, 16

GSMC

GSMC

Hammons Hotel Portfolio

371,300,000

Various

68.3%

55.5%

74.9%

131.52

97.59

2.01

Property

17

Embassy Suites Concord, NC

NAP

NAP

75.5%

6/30/2015

147.60

111.43

NAP

2.02

Property

Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN

NAP

NAP

78.0%

6/30/2015

134.42

104.82

NAP

2.03

Property

Embassy Suites Norman, OK

NAP

NAP

74.3%

6/30/2015

118.40

87.99

NAP

2.04

Property

15

Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX

45,000,000

6/11/2017

77.9%

6/30/2015

115.61

90.01

NAP

2.05

Property

15, 18

Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ

57,200,000

6/8/2016

63.8%

6/30/2015

163.99

104.66

NAP

2.06

Property

Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL

NAP

NAP

78.2%

6/30/2015

114.52

89.55

NAP

2.07

Property

15

Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO

16,500,000

6/10/2016

80.9%

6/30/2015

106.41

86.03

NAP

3

Loan

19, 20

CGMRC

CGMRC

The Decoration & Design Building

NAP

NAP

41.3%

37.5%

94.8%

6/3/2015

NAP

NAP

Stark

37,174

11/30/2024

4

Loan

21

GSMC

GSMC

Hamilton Landing

NAP

NAP

70.8%

70.8%

91.8%

7/1/2015

NAP

NAP

Visual Concepts

109,923

3/31/2019

5

Loan

8, 22, 23

GSMC

GSMC

Courtyard Sunnyvale

60,600,000

8/1/2018

70.0%

61.5%

75.3%

7/31/2015

224.83

169.30

NAP

6

Loan

8, 24, 25

RMF

RMF

Somerset Park Apartments

249,750,000

5/20/2016

72.1%

72.1%

93.2%

8/11/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

7

Loan

8, 26, 27

RMF

RMF

Greylyn Business Park

49,250,000

6/1/2016

74.4%

63.8%

82.6%

6/11/2015

NAP

NAP

AECOM Technology Corporation

44,048

5/31/2021

8

Loan

8, 28

GSMC

GSMC

Pavilion Jenkintown

49,000,000

11/1/2016

66.3%

51.2%

81.2%

6/1/2015

NAP

NAP

Kalnin Graphics, Inc.

12,678

12/31/2018

9

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

University Place

NAP

NAP

74.3%

67.9%

90.9%

6/10/2015

NAP

NAP

Dick’s Sporting Goods

45,000

1/31/2018

10

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio

NAP

NAP

72.8%

63.9%

100.0%

NAP

NAP

10.01

Property

Dale Avenue Roanoke

NAP

NAP

100.0%

9/6/2015

NAP

NAP

Walmart

41,117

1/27/2035

10.02

Property

Plantation Road Walmart

NAP

NAP

100.0%

9/6/2015

NAP

NAP

Walmart

41,839

1/27/2035

10.03

Property

Walmart Orange Avenue

NAP

NAP

100.0%

9/6/2015

NAP

NAP

Walmart

41,117

3/15/2035

11

Loan

8, 29

CGMRC

CGMRC

Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio

29,100,000

Various

71.6%

63.2%

84.4%

NAP

NAP

11.01

Property

Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills

NAP

NAP

94.2%

8/5/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

11.02

Property

Compass Self Storage Novi

9,900,000

6/4/2016

87.0%

8/5/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

11.03

Property

Compass Self Storage Madison Heights

9,100,000

6/5/2017

73.5%

8/5/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

12

Loan

30

GSMC

GSMC

Mix at Midtown

NAP

NAP

68.4%

54.9%

100.0%

8/5/2015

NAP

NAP

24 Hour Fitness

49,000

6/30/2023

13

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Red Dot Storage Portfolio

NAP

NAP

72.8%

63.8%

91.0%

NAP

NAP

13.01

Property

Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL

NAP

NAP

91.1%

6/25/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

13.02

Property

Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL

NAP

NAP

92.8%

6/25/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

13.03

Property

Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL

NAP

NAP

88.3%

6/25/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

13.04

Property

Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL

NAP

NAP

87.0%

6/25/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

13.05

Property

Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI

NAP

NAP

94.6%

6/25/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

13.06

Property

Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL

NAP

NAP

93.0%

6/25/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

13.07

Property

Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI

NAP

NAP

93.9%

6/25/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

13.08

Property

Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL

NAP

NAP

87.1%

6/25/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

13.09

Property

Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL

NAP

NAP

90.8%

6/25/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

14

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Stadium Plaza

NAP

NAP

75.0%

61.4%

98.4%

6/30/2015

NAP

NAP

Hobby Lobby

63,024

8/31/2019

15

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Houston Hotel Portfolio

NAP

NAP

64.5%

52.5%

71.6%

122.82

87.86

15.01

Property

Holiday Inn Express West Road

NAP

NAP

68.9%

6/30/2015

128.51

88.48

NAP

15.02

Property

Hampton Inn Port Arthur

NAP

NAP

74.8%

6/30/2015

116.49

87.11

NAP

16

Loan

RMF

RMF

Courtyard at Cedar Hills

NAP

NAP

65.0%

65.0%

98.6%

7/1/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

17

Loan

31

GSMC

GSMC

Peckham Square

NAP

NAP

74.1%

62.8%

96.3%

8/1/2015

NAP

NAP

Savers

28,600

12/1/2025

18

Loan

32, 33

CGMRC

CGMRC

Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center

NAP

NAP

75.0%

67.7%

96.8%

NAP

NAP

18.01

Property

33

Mason Town House

NAP

NAP

98.5%

6/4/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

18.02

Property

33

Park View Business Center

NAP

NAP

90.8%

4/28/2015

NAP

NAP

Finest Furniture

8,800

11/30/2016

19

Loan

GSMC

GSMC

Dover Marketplace

NAP

NAP

75.0%

68.7%

100.0%

7/9/2015

NAP

NAP

Giant Foods

44,744

9/30/2021

20

Loan

34, 35

RAIT Funding, LLC

RAIT Funding, LLC

Lanier Crossing Shopping Center

NAP

NAP

70.4%

57.9%

93.1%

8/1/2015

NAP

NAP

Hobby Lobby

54,154

5/31/2020

21

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Waterway Shoppes II

16,200,000

5/1/2016

72.1%

62.3%

100.0%

5/7/2015

NAP

NAP

Sage Dental

3,589

4/30/2021

22

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Avenue District Apartments

NAP

NAP

63.3%

55.1%

96.6%

8/10/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

23

Loan

RAIT Funding, LLC

RAIT Funding, LLC

University Retail Portfolio

NAP

NAP

70.1%

64.6%

100.0%

NAP

NAP

23.01

Property

517 Kirkwood Avenue

NAP

NAP

100.0%

8/1/2015

NAP

NAP

The Trustees of Indiana University

15,662

8/31/2027

23.02

Property

36

501 East Green Street

NAP

NAP

100.0%

8/1/2015

NAP

NAP

Potbelly Sandwich Company

2,464

5/31/2025

23.03

Property

1801 West Tennessee Street

NAP

NAP

100.0%

8/1/2015

NAP

NAP

Chipotle

2,538

12/31/2020

24

Loan

RMF

RMF

Carrollwood Village Shoppes

NAP

NAP

74.7%

68.7%

97.3%

6/30/2015

NAP

NAP

Chili’s Grill & Bar

5,972

1/31/2019

25

Loan

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Plaza El Toro

NAP

NAP

64.9%

55.8%

100.0%

6/1/2015

NAP

NAP

CVS

23,800

2/28/2021

26

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Barclay Village

NAP

NAP

58.3%

58.3%

99.3%

5/31/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

27

Loan

RMF

RMF

Hyatt Plantation

NAP

NAP

64.9%

53.3%

81.6%

6/30/2015

114.40

93.33

NAP

28

Loan

37

GSMC

GSMC

Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar

NAP

NAP

56.1%

47.8%

83.5%

6/30/2015

146.36

122.15

NAP

29

Loan

RMF

RMF

Riverwalk Center

NAP

NAP

72.8%

64.1%

100.0%

6/3/2015

NAP

NAP

GenSpring Holdings, Inc.

35,324

3/31/2022

30

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Premiere Building

NAP

NAP

51.7%

51.7%

92.9%

6/30/2015

NAP

NAP

Premier Health & Fitness

12,800

5/31/2018

31

Loan

8, 38

CGMRC

CGMRC

TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio

15,800,000

6/8/2017

63.0%

48.7%

78.1%

84.26

65.85

31.01

Property

Keystone

9,900,000

6/8/2017

81.5%

5/31/2015

94.35

76.92

NAP

31.02

Property

Park 100

5,900,000

6/8/2017

75.2%

5/31/2015

74.72

56.19

NAP

32

Loan

8, 39, 40

CGMRC

CGMRC

Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky

16,800,000

4/20/2017

53.2%

46.0%

62.5%

3/31/2015

115.63

72.31

NAP

33

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Anderson Oaks

NAP

NAP

69.3%

59.1%

94.1%

8/6/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

A-15

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A  

Control Number

Loan / Property Flag

Footnotes

Mortgage Loan Seller

Originator

Property Name

As Stabilized Appraised Value ($)

As Stabilized Appraisal Date

Cut-off Date LTV Ratio (%)

LTV Ratio at Maturity (%)

Occupancy (%) (5)

Occupancy Date

ADR ($)

RevPAR ($)

Largest Tenant

Largest Tenant Sq Ft

Largest Tenant Lease Expiration (6)

34

Loan

41

CGMRC

CGMRC

Easy Stop Storage Portfolio

NAP

NAP

66.7%

56.0%

82.6%

NAP

NAP

34.01

Property

Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop

NAP

NAP

83.5%

7/7/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

34.02

Property

Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop

NAP

NAP

85.6%

7/7/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

34.03

Property

Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial

NAP

NAP

75.0%

7/7/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

35

Loan

42, 43

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Scott’s Edge Apartments

NAP

NAP

72.8%

64.0%

97.9%

6/22/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

36

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Solomon CVS Portfolio

NAP

NAP

66.1%

49.2%

100.0%

NAP

NAP

36.01

Property

CVS Brandon

NAP

NAP

100.0%

8/1/2015

NAP

NAP

CVS

13,813

8/20/2023

36.02

Property

CVS Paris

NAP

NAP

100.0%

8/1/2015

NAP

NAP

CVS

12,738

4/13/2019

36.03

Property

CVS Plano

NAP

NAP

100.0%

8/1/2015

NAP

NAP

CVS

10,880

10/26/2016

37

Loan

8

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Westgate Plaza

14,300,000

9/19/2015

54.1%

46.3%

93.5%

7/10/2015

NAP

NAP

Mark Thomas Ministries

18,909

10/1/2019

38

Loan

8, 44

CGMRC

CGMRC

Residence Inn Southern Pines

11,600,000

7/1/2016

64.6%

58.0%

74.6%

6/30/2015

110.14

82.14

NAP

39

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Imperial Landing Apartments

NAP

NAP

73.4%

63.1%

97.0%

5/31/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

40

Loan

8

CGMRC

CGMRC

Corporate Place

10,250,000

6/1/2016

73.8%

58.4%

83.8%

5/14/2015

NAP

NAP

Austin Powder

29,704

3/31/2024

41

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Bricktown Shopping Center

12,300,000

7/1/2016

57.6%

49.9%

83.9%

6/1/2015

NAP

NAP

Big Lots

34,934

1/31/2027

42

Loan

RMF

RMF

Hyatt John’s Creek

NAP

NAP

62.1%

50.9%

66.2%

6/30/2015

102.92

68.10

NAP

43

Loan

RMF

RMF

Hyatt Place Rogers

NAP

NAP

66.9%

54.9%

70.2%

6/30/2015

103.76

72.85

NAP

44

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

AR&C Storage

NAP

NAP

64.7%

56.6%

98.7%

6/15/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

45

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages

10,900,000

6/1/2016

61.0%

45.2%

69.8%

5/31/2015

105.07

73.34

NAP

46

Loan

RAIT Funding, LLC

RAIT Funding, LLC

Renaissance Faire I

NAP

NAP

69.2%

56.3%

86.0%

7/1/2015

NAP

NAP

US Bank

70,474

2/28/2023

47

Loan

RMF

RMF

Cottages at White Oak

NAP

NAP

69.6%

57.4%

100.0%

5/31/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

48

Loan

45

GSMC

GSMC

Village Square Shopping Center

NAP

NAP

74.9%

63.8%

97.5%

6/30/2015

NAP

NAP

BI-LO

42,853

2/28/2021

49

Loan

RMF

RMF

Northstone Apartments

NAP

NAP

57.3%

52.5%

95.8%

7/10/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

50

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Willow Park Apartments

NAP

NAP

63.5%

55.6%

95.0%

6/29/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

51

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Cherry Creek

7,580,000

6/5/2016

70.8%

58.9%

92.9%

6/15/2015

NAP

NAP

Ace Hardware

12,500

3/31/2019

52

Loan

8

CGMRC

CGMRC

Glenville Target Center

8,470,000

5/1/2016

63.9%

46.7%

77.3%

3/12/2015

NAP

NAP

Pet Supplies Plus

8,376

7/31/2025

53

Loan

8, 46

RMF

RMF

Glades Tower II

7,200,000

12/24/2015

61.4%

53.3%

100.0%

6/1/2015

NAP

NAP

South Broward Hospital District dba Memorial Healthcare System

3,333

2/28/2017

54

Loan

47

RMF

RMF

Maximum Self Storage

NAP

NAP

73.7%

67.7%

82.0%

8/3/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

55

Loan

8, 48

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Sonora Crossroads

6,700,000

7/1/2016

61.0%

50.7%

79.3%

7/1/2015

NAP

NAP

Payless Shoesource

2,902

5/31/2018

56

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Albertson’s Retail Shops

6,390,000

5/1/2016

65.3%

56.2%

82.4%

6/1/2015

NAP

NAP

AutoZone

6,944

5/31/2019

57

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

210 Bedford Avenue

NAP

NAP

55.1%

50.6%

100.0%

7/17/2015

NAP

NAP

Juice Generation 10, Inc.

1,505

9/30/2023

58

Loan

RMF

RMF

Capital Clifton Park Self Storage

NAP

NAP

73.2%

59.8%

100.0%

6/23/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

59

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Hunters Pointe

NAP

NAP

73.7%

60.1%

98.3%

6/18/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

60

Loan

49

GSMC

GSMC

AkzoNobel Coatings

NAP

NAP

60.2%

48.9%

100.0%

4/1/2015

NAP

NAP

AkzoNobel Coatings, Inc

77,500

6/30/2025

61

Loan

GSMC

GSMC

4238 West Hundred Road

NAP

NAP

61.3%

49.2%

100.0%

7/1/2015

NAP

NAP

Walgreens

14,820

8/30/2080

62

Loan

50, 51

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)

NAP

NAP

54.4%

44.6%

100.0%

5/1/2015

NAP

NAP

EXP Elite Performance

3,970

7/31/2020

63

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Gardens of Victoria

NAP

NAP

75.0%

64.6%

93.9%

6/30/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

64

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Woodview Commons

NAP

NAP

74.4%

60.0%

100.0%

7/21/2015

NAP

NAP

NAP

A-16

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number

Loan / Property Flag

Footnotes

Mortgage Loan Seller

Originator

Property Name

Second Largest Tenant

Second Largest Tenant Sq Ft

Second Largest Tenant Lease Expiration (6)

Third Largest Tenant

Third Largest Tenant Sq Ft

Third Largest Tenant Lease Expiration (6)

Fourth Largest Tenant

Fourth Largest Tenant Sq Ft

Fourth Largest Tenant Lease Expiration (6)

1

Loan

8, 9, 10, 11, 12

CGMRC

CGMRC

Illinois Center

1.01

Property

111 East Wacker

Combined Insurance Company

99,204

7/14/2021

Taft Stettinius & Hollister

69,298

5/31/2025

Zenith Media Services, Inc.

66,768

7/31/2019

1.02

Property

233 North Michigan Avenue

Clear Channel Broadcasting

73,353

7/31/2024

Young & Rubicam, Inc.

69,292

11/30/2018

American Health Information

34,780

10/31/2024

2

Loan

8, 13, 14, 15, 16

GSMC

GSMC

Hammons Hotel Portfolio

2.01

Property

17

Embassy Suites Concord, NC

NAP

NAP

NAP

2.02

Property

Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN

NAP

NAP

NAP

2.03

Property

Embassy Suites Norman, OK

NAP

NAP

NAP

2.04

Property

15

Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX

NAP

NAP

NAP

2.05

Property

15, 18

Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ

NAP

NAP

NAP

2.06

Property

Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL

NAP

NAP

NAP

2.07

Property

15

Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO

NAP

NAP

NAP

3

Loan

19, 20

CGMRC

CGMRC

The Decoration & Design Building

Kravet Fabrics Inc

23,766

MTM

F.Schumacher & Co

22,745

6/30/2017

Holly Hunt LTD, NY

19,056

3/31/2017

4

Loan

21

GSMC

GSMC

Hamilton Landing

Raptor Pharmaceutical Corp

60,979

8/31/2021

Marin Community Foundation

31,705

12/31/2018

Activision

24,114

1/31/2016

5

Loan

8, 22, 23

GSMC

GSMC

Courtyard Sunnyvale

NAP

NAP

NAP

6

Loan

8, 24, 25

RMF

RMF

Somerset Park Apartments

NAP

NAP

NAP

7

Loan

8, 26, 27

RMF

RMF

Greylyn Business Park

Sweetwater Logistics

36,000

8/31/2019

CT Partners II, LLC

31,258

2/28/2019

Anita Goodesign, Inc.

22,957

12/31/2017

8

Loan

8, 28

GSMC

GSMC

Pavilion Jenkintown

Sarah Care

12,500

11/30/2025

PA Heart & Vascular

12,050

8/31/2017

Department of Correction

9,490

10/31/2019

9

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

University Place

American Multi-Cinema

31,088

8/31/2030

Best Buy

30,000

1/31/2018

TJ Maxx

24,568

11/30/2020

10

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio

10.01

Property

Dale Avenue Roanoke

NAP

NAP

NAP

10.02

Property

Plantation Road Walmart

NAP

NAP

NAP

10.03

Property

Walmart Orange Avenue

NAP

NAP

NAP

11

Loan

8, 29

CGMRC

CGMRC

Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio

11.01

Property

Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills

NAP

NAP

NAP

11.02

Property

Compass Self Storage Novi

NAP

NAP

NAP

11.03

Property

Compass Self Storage Madison Heights

NAP

NAP

NAP

12

Loan

30

GSMC

GSMC

Mix at Midtown

Artisans Restaurant

7,640

5/4/2021

Holley’s

6,777

2/10/2024

Piola Pizzeria

3,094

6/6/2020

13

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Red Dot Storage Portfolio

13.01

Property

Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL

NAP

NAP

NAP

13.02

Property

Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL

NAP

NAP

NAP

13.03

Property

Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL

NAP

NAP

NAP

13.04

Property

Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL

NAP

NAP

NAP

13.05

Property

Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI

NAP

NAP

NAP

13.06

Property

Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL

NAP

NAP

NAP

13.07

Property

Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI

NAP

NAP

NAP

13.08

Property

Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL

NAP

NAP

NAP

13.09

Property

Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL

NAP

NAP

NAP

14

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Stadium Plaza

Best Buy

45,000

7/31/2020

Texas Roadhouse

11,550

8/16/2026

G&D Steakhouse

2,000

12/31/2018

15

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Houston Hotel Portfolio

15.01

Property

Holiday Inn Express West Road

NAP

NAP

NAP

15.02

Property

Hampton Inn Port Arthur

NAP

NAP

NAP

16

Loan

RMF

RMF

Courtyard at Cedar Hills

NAP

NAP

NAP

17

Loan

31

GSMC

GSMC

Peckham Square

Grocery Outlet, Inc.

27,300

6/13/2020

Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.

24,700

12/31/2020

Harbor Freight Tools

16,426

5/31/2019

18

Loan

32, 33

CGMRC

CGMRC

Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center

18.01

Property

33

Mason Town House

NAP

NAP

NAP

18.02

Property

33

Park View Business Center

Communication Services, Inc.

7,817

3/30/2016

Pancake House

3,000

12/8/2019

ComCast

2,850

3/31/2016

19

Loan

GSMC

GSMC

Dover Marketplace

M&T Bank

3,100

10/31/2021

Advantage Physical Therapy

2,400

1/31/2019

Giant Gas

2,400

9/30/2021

20

Loan

34, 35

RAIT Funding, LLC

RAIT Funding, LLC

Lanier Crossing Shopping Center

Ichiban Asian Buffet

7,850

8/31/2030

Aaron’s Inc. (Gross Lease)

7,000

4/30/2020

Stevi B’s Pizza

4,184

12/31/2019

21

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Waterway Shoppes II

Mitch’s Westside Bagels

3,475

12/1/2020

Watermark Realty, Inc dba Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Florida Realty

3,198

7/31/2017

Abrazados LLC (La Rural Argentine Grill)

3,038

10/29/2017

22

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Avenue District Apartments

NAP

NAP

NAP

23

Loan

RAIT Funding, LLC

RAIT Funding, LLC

University Retail Portfolio

23.01

Property

517 Kirkwood Avenue

Noodles & Company

2,989

3/31/2019

Potbelly Sandwich Company

2,273

8/31/2021

NAP

23.02

Property

36

501 East Green Street

Starbucks

2,255

7/31/2020

Chase

7/31/2017

NAP

23.03

Property

1801 West Tennessee Street

Yogurt Mountain

1,681

3/31/2016

Nutri-Shop

1,681

1/31/2017

Jersey Mikes Subs

1,600

12/31/2020

24

Loan

RMF

RMF

Carrollwood Village Shoppes

Side Splitters Comedy Club

5,300

5/31/2019

Ocean#538DD5 Sushi Bar

4,615

7/31/2016

Empress Tea Room & Bistro

3,031

7/31/2017

25

Loan

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Plaza El Toro

Ride Our Planet

4,320

5/31/2020

Tula Market

3,428

6/30/2020

BOSCO Sport

2,800

11/30/2019

26

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Barclay Village

NAP

NAP

NAP

27

Loan

RMF

RMF

Hyatt Plantation

NAP

NAP

NAP

28

Loan

37

GSMC

GSMC

Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar

NAP

NAP

NAP

29

Loan

RMF

RMF

Riverwalk Center

NAP

NAP

NAP

30

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Premiere Building

Landau & Associates, P.A.

9,639

9/30/2018

Global Capital, LLC

6,635

9/30/2019

Phonetime Network, Inc.

6,550

3/31/2019

31

Loan

8, 38

CGMRC

CGMRC

TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio

31.01

Property

Keystone

NAP

NAP

NAP

31.02

Property

Park 100

NAP

NAP

NAP

32

Loan

8, 39, 40

CGMRC

CGMRC

Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky

NAP

NAP

NAP

33

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Anderson Oaks

NAP

NAP

NAP

A-17

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number

Loan / Property Flag

Footnotes

Mortgage Loan Seller

Originator

Property Name

Second Largest Tenant

Second Largest Tenant Sq Ft

Second Largest Tenant Lease Expiration (6)

Third Largest Tenant

Third Largest Tenant Sq Ft

Third Largest Tenant Lease Expiration (6)

Fourth Largest Tenant

Fourth Largest Tenant Sq Ft

Fourth Largest Tenant Lease Expiration (6)

34

Loan

41

CGMRC

CGMRC

Easy Stop Storage Portfolio

34.01

Property

Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop

NAP

NAP

NAP

34.02

Property

Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop

NAP

NAP

NAP

34.03

Property

Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial

NAP

NAP

NAP

35

Loan

42, 43

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Scott’s Edge Apartments

NAP

NAP

NAP

36

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Solomon CVS Portfolio

36.01

Property

CVS Brandon

NAP

NAP

NAP

36.02

Property

CVS Paris

NAP

NAP

NAP

36.03

Property

CVS Plano

NAP

NAP

NAP

37

Loan

8

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Westgate Plaza

99 Cents Only

13,500

10/1/2025

Arrowhead Credit

6,037

8/31/2017

Bright Now! Dental

4,500

4/30/2018

38

Loan

8, 44

CGMRC

CGMRC

Residence Inn Southern Pines

NAP

NAP

NAP

39

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Imperial Landing Apartments

NAP

NAP

NAP

40

Loan

8

CGMRC

CGMRC

Corporate Place

MIM Software

28,160

6/30/2019

Beacon Financial Partners

8,364

4/30/2017

Weber Wood Medinger

4,530

12/31/2018

41

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Bricktown Shopping Center

Aldi

15,443

5/31/2021

Pure Focus Sports Club

9,562

2/28/2021

Bonefish Grill

6,000

11/30/2016

42

Loan

RMF

RMF

Hyatt John’s Creek

NAP

NAP

NAP

43

Loan

RMF

RMF

Hyatt Place Rogers

NAP

NAP

NAP

44

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

AR&C Storage

NAP

NAP

NAP

45

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages

NAP

NAP

NAP

46

Loan

RAIT Funding, LLC

RAIT Funding, LLC

Renaissance Faire I

Weigel Broadcasting

28,626

2/28/2019

Bay Industries

16,984

5/31/2020

All Parts

14,623

6/30/2018

47

Loan

RMF

RMF

Cottages at White Oak

NAP

NAP

NAP

48

Loan

45

GSMC

GSMC

Village Square Shopping Center

Little China Restaurant

4,165

9/30/2020

Wild Birds Unlimited

3,318

6/30/2016

Tera’s Merle Norman

3,038

1/31/2016

49

Loan

RMF

RMF

Northstone Apartments

NAP

NAP

NAP

50

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Willow Park Apartments

NAP

NAP

NAP

51

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Cherry Creek

Lorenz Appliances

8,400

12/31/2017

Panera, LLC

4,848

12/31/2018

Elegant Seasons

3,700

3/31/2019

52

Loan

8

CGMRC

CGMRC

Glenville Target Center

Sleepy’s

5,950

11/30/2023

Panera

3,800

12/31/2022

Visionary Properties

2,938

1/31/2024

53

Loan

8, 46

RMF

RMF

Glades Tower II

Midwifery Women’s Care

3,293

6/30/2019

Executive Medical Spaces

3,293

5/30/2020

WR Rosen - Level Four Orthotics & Prosthetics

2,045

12/31/2019

54

Loan

47

RMF

RMF

Maximum Self Storage

NAP

NAP

NAP

55

Loan

8, 48

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Sonora Crossroads

Carpe Pizza

2,179

9/30/2019

Dickey’s Barbeque Pit

2,126

12/9/2025

It’s Yo Good Frozen Yogurt

1,348

9/1/2016

56

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Albertson’s Retail Shops

Security Services Federal Credit Union

2,800

5/31/2020

Check Into Cash

1,400

7/31/2017

Li Yan Huang Chinese Rest.

1,400

12/31/2019

57

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

210 Bedford Avenue

NAP

NAP

NAP

58

Loan

RMF

RMF

Capital Clifton Park Self Storage

NAP

NAP

NAP

59

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Hunters Pointe

NAP

NAP

NAP

60

Loan

49

GSMC

GSMC

AkzoNobel Coatings

NAP

NAP

NAP

61

Loan

GSMC

GSMC

4238 West Hundred Road

NAP

NAP

NAP

62

Loan

50, 51

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)

Santa Monica Cyclery

3,100

7/31/2020

Bigoudi International Salon and Spa

3,022

6/30/2016

NAP

63

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Gardens of Victoria

NAP

NAP

NAP

64

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Woodview Commons

NAP

NAP

NAP

A-18

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number

Loan / Property Flag

Footnotes

Mortgage Loan Seller

Originator

Property Name

Fifth Largest Tenant

Fifth Largest Tenant Sq Ft

Fifth Largest Tenant Lease Expiration (6)

Environmental Phase I Report Date

Environmental Phase II Y/N

Environmental Phase II Report Date

Engineering Report Date

Seismic Report Date

PML or SEL (%)

Earthquake Insurance Required Y/N

1

Loan

8, 9, 10, 11, 12

CGMRC

CGMRC

Illinois Center

No

1.01

Property

111 East Wacker

State Boards of Nursing

35,174

4/30/2022

8/4/2015

No

NAP

7/20/2015

NAP

NAP

No

1.02

Property

233 North Michigan Avenue

Burrell Communications Group

34,508

12/31/2023

8/4/2015

No

NAP

7/20/2015

NAP

NAP

No

2

Loan

8, 13, 14, 15, 16

GSMC

GSMC

Hammons Hotel Portfolio

No

2.01

Property

17

Embassy Suites Concord, NC

NAP

6/25/2015

No

NAP

6/24/2015

NAP

NAP

No

2.02

Property

Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN

NAP

6/24/2015

No

NAP

6/24/2015

NAP

NAP

No

2.03

Property

Embassy Suites Norman, OK

NAP

6/24/2015

No

NAP

6/24/2015

NAP

NAP

No

2.04

Property

15

Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX

NAP

6/24/2015

No

NAP

6/24/2015

NAP

NAP

No

2.05

Property

15, 18

Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ

NAP

6/25/2015

No

NAP

6/24/2015

NAP

NAP

No

2.06

Property

Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL

NAP

6/25/2015

No

NAP

6/24/2015

NAP

NAP

No

2.07

Property

15

Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO

NAP

6/25/2015

No

NAP

6/24/2015

NAP

NAP

No

3

Loan

19, 20

CGMRC

CGMRC

The Decoration & Design Building

Donghia, Inc

18,450

9/30/2021

4/2/2015

No

NAP

4/3/2015

NAP

NAP

No

4

Loan

21

GSMC

GSMC

Hamilton Landing

Meritage Medical Network

22,266

5/31/2019

6/12/2015

No

NAP

6/12/2015

6/10/2015

15%

No

5

Loan

8, 22, 23

GSMC

GSMC

Courtyard Sunnyvale

NAP

7/17/2015

No

NAP

7/16/2015

7/16/2015

6%

No

6

Loan

8, 24, 25

RMF

RMF

Somerset Park Apartments

NAP

6/2/2015

No

NAP

5/29/2015

NAP

NAP

No

7

Loan

8, 26, 27

RMF

RMF

Greylyn Business Park

Stronghaven, Inc.

21,965

10/31/2017

5/1/2015

No

NAP

6/10/2015

NAP

NAP

No

8

Loan

8, 28

GSMC

GSMC

Pavilion Jenkintown

Shor/Levin/Plotnick

8,758

12/31/2018

6/25/2015

No

NAP

6/26/2015

NAP

NAP

No

9

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

University Place

Petco

15,000

8/30/2016

4/9/2015

No

NAP

4/9/2015

NAP

NAP

No

10

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio

No

10.01

Property

Dale Avenue Roanoke

NAP

3/23/2015

No

NAP

3/23/2015

NAP

NAP

No

10.02

Property

Plantation Road Walmart

NAP

3/19/2015

No

NAP

3/23/2015

NAP

NAP

No

10.03

Property

Walmart Orange Avenue

NAP

3/20/2015

No

NAP

3/23/2015

NAP

NAP

No

11

Loan

8, 29

CGMRC

CGMRC

Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio

No

11.01

Property

Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills

NAP

6/22/2015

No

NAP

6/19/2015

NAP

NAP

No

11.02

Property

Compass Self Storage Novi

NAP

6/22/2015

No

NAP

6/19/2015

NAP

NAP

No

11.03

Property

Compass Self Storage Madison Heights

NAP

6/22/2015

No

NAP

6/19/2015

NAP

NAP

No

12

Loan

30

GSMC

GSMC

Mix at Midtown

Jinya Ramen

2,842

5/9/2024

7/27/2015

No

NAP

7/24/2015

NAP

NAP

No

13

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Red Dot Storage Portfolio

No

13.01

Property

Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL

NAP

6/4/2015

No

NAP

6/4/2015

NAP

NAP

No

13.02

Property

Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL

NAP

6/4/2015

No

NAP

6/5/2015

NAP

NAP

No

13.03

Property

Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL

NAP

6/4/2015

No

NAP

6/4/2015

NAP

NAP

No

13.04

Property

Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL

NAP

6/4/2015

No

NAP

6/4/2015

NAP

NAP

No

13.05

Property

Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI

NAP

6/4/2015

No

NAP

6/5/2015

NAP

NAP

No

13.06

Property

Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL

NAP

6/4/2015

No

NAP

6/4/2015

NAP

NAP

No

13.07

Property

Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI

NAP

6/4/2015

No

NAP

6/4/2015

NAP

NAP

No

13.08

Property

Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL

NAP

6/4/2015

No

NAP

6/4/2015

NAP

NAP

No

13.09

Property

Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL

NAP

6/4/2015

No

NAP

6/4/2015

NAP

NAP

No

14

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Stadium Plaza

Sally Beauty

2,000

2/28/2019

5/6/2015

No

NAP

7/3/2015

NAP

NAP

No

15

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Houston Hotel Portfolio

No

15.01

Property

Holiday Inn Express West Road

NAP

6/18/2015

No

NAP

6/19/2015

NAP

NAP

No

15.02

Property

Hampton Inn Port Arthur

NAP

6/18/2015

No

NAP

6/19/2015

NAP

NAP

No

16

Loan

RMF

RMF

Courtyard at Cedar Hills

NAP

7/10/2015

No

NAP

7/10/2015

7/10/2015

11%

No

17

Loan

31

GSMC

GSMC

Peckham Square

Family Dollar

12,015

3/31/2022

7/10/2015

No

NAP

7/13/2015

7/13/2015

11%

No

18

Loan

32, 33

CGMRC

CGMRC

Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center

No

18.01

Property

33

Mason Town House

NAP

3/26/2015

No

NAP

3/26/2015

NAP

NAP

No

18.02

Property

33

Park View Business Center

Secretary of State

2,640

6/30/2017

3/26/2015

No

NAP

3/26/2015

NAP

NAP

No

19

Loan

GSMC

GSMC

Dover Marketplace

Great Clips

1,200

9/30/2018

5/27/2015

No

NAP

5/28/2015

NAP

NAP

No

20

Loan

34, 35

RAIT Funding, LLC

RAIT Funding, LLC

Lanier Crossing Shopping Center

Steven’s Country Kitchen

3,955

10/31/2018

7/13/2015

Yes

8/10/2015

7/13/2015

NAP

NAP

No

21

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Waterway Shoppes II

Acquolina

2,981

12/6/2017

3/23/2015

No

NAP

3/20/2015

NAP

NAP

No

22

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Avenue District Apartments

NAP

6/16/2015

No

NAP

6/15/2015

NAP

NAP

No

23

Loan

RAIT Funding, LLC

RAIT Funding, LLC

University Retail Portfolio

No

23.01

Property

517 Kirkwood Avenue

NAP

7/7/2015

No

NAP

7/7/2015

NAP

NAP

No

23.02

Property

36

501 East Green Street

NAP

7/8/2015

Yes

7/20/2015

7/8/2015

NAP

NAP

No

23.03

Property

1801 West Tennessee Street

NAP

7/8/2015

No

NAP

7/8/2015

NAP

NAP

No

24

Loan

RMF

RMF

Carrollwood Village Shoppes

Anthony’s Coal Fired Pizza

3,000

2/28/2019

5/4/2015

No

NAP

5/4/2015

NAP

NAP

No

25

Loan

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Plaza El Toro

Carl’s Jr.

2,722

2/28/2019

6/11/2015

No

NAP

6/12/2015

6/11/2015

12%

No

26

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Barclay Village

NAP

6/22/2015

No

NAP

6/18/2015

6/22/2015

8%

No

27

Loan

RMF

RMF

Hyatt Plantation

NAP

5/26/2015

No

NAP

5/19/2015

NAP

NAP

No

28

Loan

37

GSMC

GSMC

Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar

NAP

6/25/2015

No

NAP

6/25/2015

6/26/2015

5%

No

29

Loan

RMF

RMF

Riverwalk Center

NAP

6/8/2015

No

NAP

6/5/2015

NAP

NAP

No

30

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Premiere Building

Todd Landau, P.A.

4,020

9/30/2018

5/20/2015

No

NAP

5/20/2015

NAP

NAP

No

31

Loan

8, 38

CGMRC

CGMRC

TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio

No

31.01

Property

Keystone

NAP

5/13/2015

No

NAP

5/14/2015

NAP

NAP

No

31.02

Property

Park 100

NAP

5/13/2015

No

NAP

5/14/2015

NAP

NAP

No

32

Loan

8, 39, 40

CGMRC

CGMRC

Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky

NAP

4/20/2015

No

NAP

5/5/2015

NAP

NAP

No

33

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Anderson Oaks

NAP

8/18/2015

No

NAP

7/30/2015

NAP

NAP

No

A-19

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number

Loan / Property Flag

Footnotes

Mortgage Loan Seller

Originator

Property Name

Fifth Largest Tenant

Fifth Largest Tenant Sq Ft

Fifth Largest Tenant Lease Expiration (6)

Environmental Phase I Report Date

Environmental Phase II Y/N

Environmental Phase II Report Date

Engineering Report Date

Seismic Report Date

PML or SEL (%)

Earthquake Insurance Required Y/N

34

Loan

41

CGMRC

CGMRC

Easy Stop Storage Portfolio

No

34.01

Property

Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop

NAP

5/27/2015

No

NAP

5/22/2015

NAP

NAP

No

34.02

Property

Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop

NAP

5/27/2015

No

NAP

5/22/2015

NAP

NAP

No

34.03

Property

Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial

NAP

5/27/2015

No

NAP

5/22/2015

NAP

NAP

No

35

Loan

42, 43

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Scott’s Edge Apartments

NAP

7/22/2015

No

NAP

7/22/2015

NAP

NAP

No

36

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Solomon CVS Portfolio

No

36.01

Property

CVS Brandon

NAP

8/7/2015

No

NAP

8/7/2015

NAP

NAP

No

36.02

Property

CVS Paris

NAP

8/7/2015

No

NAP

8/7/2015

NAP

NAP

No

36.03

Property

CVS Plano

NAP

8/7/2015

No

NAP

8/7/2015

NAP

NAP

No

37

Loan

8

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Westgate Plaza

Peking

2,396

1/31/2020

6/12/2015

No

NAP

6/12/2015

6/11/2015

12%

No

38

Loan

8, 44

CGMRC

CGMRC

Residence Inn Southern Pines

NAP

7/1/2015

No

NAP

7/1/2015

NAP

NAP

No

39

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Imperial Landing Apartments

NAP

7/6/2015

No

NAP

7/1/2015

NAP

NAP

No

40

Loan

8

CGMRC

CGMRC

Corporate Place

Prosymmetry

1,145

6/30/2016

6/3/2015

No

NAP

6/3/2015

NAP

NAP

No

41

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Bricktown Shopping Center

McDonald’s

3,600

1/14/2029

6/24/2015

No

NAP

6/24/2015

NAP

NAP

No

42

Loan

RMF

RMF

Hyatt John’s Creek

NAP

5/26/2015

No

NAP

5/26/2015

NAP

NAP

No

43

Loan

RMF

RMF

Hyatt Place Rogers

NAP

5/26/2015

No

NAP

5/26/2015

NAP

NAP

No

44

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

AR&C Storage

NAP

6/3/2015

No

NAP

6/3/2015

NAP

NAP

No

45

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages

NAP

6/26/2015

No

NAP

6/26/2015

NAP

NAP

No

46

Loan

RAIT Funding, LLC

RAIT Funding, LLC

Renaissance Faire I

Project Access

12,700

2/28/2018

1/15/2015

No

NAP

6/10/2015

NAP

NAP

No

47

Loan

RMF

RMF

Cottages at White Oak

NAP

6/5/2015

No

NAP

6/9/2015

NAP

NAP

No

48

Loan

45

GSMC

GSMC

Village Square Shopping Center

Freehub Bicycles

2,788

3/31/2020

5/28/2015

No

NAP

5/26/2015

NAP

NAP

No

49

Loan

RMF

RMF

Northstone Apartments

NAP

5/18/2015

No

NAP

5/18/2015

NAP

NAP

No

50

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Willow Park Apartments

NAP

6/18/2015

No

NAP

6/18/2015

NAP

NAP

No

51

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Cherry Creek

Unlimited Mobility

3,400

5/31/2019

6/15/2015

No

NAP

6/15/2015

NAP

NAP

No

52

Loan

8

CGMRC

CGMRC

Glenville Target Center

Super Nail & Spa

1,900

12/31/2023

4/7/2015

No

NAP

3/28/2015

NAP

NAP

No

53

Loan

8, 46

RMF

RMF

Glades Tower II

LabCorp

1,999

2/28/2018

3/30/2015

No

NAP

3/30/2015

NAP

NAP

No

54

Loan

47

RMF

RMF

Maximum Self Storage

NAP

7/8/2015

No

NAP

7/8/2015

NAP

NAP

No

55

Loan

8, 48

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Sonora Crossroads

Sally Beauty

1,330

4/21/2016

7/14/2015

No

NAP

7/14/2015

7/14/2015

4%

No

56

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Albertson’s Retail Shops

Papa Murphy’s

1,400

8/31/2019

5/20/2015

No

NAP

5/19/2015

NAP

NAP

No

57

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

210 Bedford Avenue

NAP

6/30/2015

No

NAP

6/30/2015

NAP

NAP

No

58

Loan

RMF

RMF

Capital Clifton Park Self Storage

NAP

6/26/2015

No

NAP

6/26/2015

NAP

NAP

No

59

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Hunters Pointe

NAP

5/27/2015

No

NAP

5/29/2015

NAP

NAP

No

60

Loan

49

GSMC

GSMC

AkzoNobel Coatings

NAP

5/27/2015

No

NAP

5/28/2015

NAP

NAP

No

61

Loan

GSMC

GSMC

4238 West Hundred Road

NAP

7/13/2015

No

NAP

7/10/2015

NAP

NAP

No

62

Loan

50, 51

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)

NAP

7/1/2015

No

NAP

7/6/2015

7/1/2015

14%

No

63

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Gardens of Victoria

NAP

7/9/2015

No

NAP

7/9/2015

NAP

NAP

No

64

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Woodview Commons

NAP

5/27/2015

No

NAP

5/29/2015

NAP

NAP

No

A-20

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Upfront RE Tax Reserve ($)	Ongoing RE Tax Reserve ($)	Upfront Insurance Reserve ($)	Ongoing Insurance Reserve ($)	Upfront Replacement Reserve ($)	Ongoing Replacement Reserve ($)	Replacement Reserve Caps ($)	Upfront TI/LC Reserve ($)	Ongoing TI/LC Reserve ($)	TI/LC Caps ($)
1	Loan	8, 9, 10, 11, 12	CGMRC	CGMRC	Illinois Center	1,922,899	961,450	0	0	0	34,865	0	12,500,000	0	15,000,000
1.01	Property				111 East Wacker
1.02	Property				233 North Michigan Avenue
2	Loan	8, 13, 14, 15, 16	GSMC	GSMC	Hammons Hotel Portfolio	3,172,482	358,585	0	0	0	360,433	0	0	0	0
2.01	Property	17			Embassy Suites Concord, NC
2.02	Property				Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN
2.03	Property				Embassy Suites Norman, OK
2.04	Property	15			Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX
2.05	Property	15, 18			Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ
2.06	Property				Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL
2.07	Property	15			Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO
3	Loan	19, 20	CGMRC	CGMRC	The Decoration & Design Building	2,128,973	1,064,487	0	0	0	10,543	0	0	0	0
4	Loan	21	GSMC	GSMC	Hamilton Landing	698,347	139,669	0	0	0	8,466	0	3,000,000	0	0
5	Loan	8, 22, 23	GSMC	GSMC	Courtyard Sunnyvale	130,002	21,667	16,127	8,063	0	33,788	0	0	0	0
6	Loan	8, 24, 25	RMF	RMF	Somerset Park Apartments	672,715	106,780	0	0	26,500,000	46,375	0	0	0	0
7	Loan	8, 26, 27	RMF	RMF	Greylyn Business Park	242,903	33,048	8,735	4,159	0	11,886	520,000	1,250,000	54,026	1,250,000
8	Loan	8, 28	GSMC	GSMC	Pavilion Jenkintown	0	63,522	0	0	0	0	0	250,000	0	250,000
9	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	University Place	581,747	48,479	0	0	0	3,941	141,891	0	10,948	262,759
10	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
10.01	Property				Dale Avenue Roanoke
10.02	Property				Plantation Road Walmart
10.03	Property				Walmart Orange Avenue
11	Loan	8, 29	CGMRC	CGMRC	Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio	19,297	19,297	0	0	0	2,607	0	0	0	0
11.01	Property				Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills
11.02	Property				Compass Self Storage Novi
11.03	Property				Compass Self Storage Madison Heights
12	Loan	30	GSMC	GSMC	Mix at Midtown	94,867	10,541	11,444	5,722	0	1,196	57,400	0	3,038	145,800
13	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Red Dot Storage Portfolio	58,784	29,392	0	0	0	3,438	82,518	0	0	0
13.01	Property				Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL
13.02	Property				Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL
13.03	Property				Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL
13.04	Property				Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL
13.05	Property				Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI
13.06	Property				Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL
13.07	Property				Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI
13.08	Property				Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL
13.09	Property				Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL
14	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Stadium Plaza	151,654	16,850	11,164	1,595	57,356	0	57,356	133,381	0	133,381
15	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Houston Hotel Portfolio	253,579	28,175	35,658	8,914	0	17,307	0	0	0	0
15.01	Property				Holiday Inn Express West Road
15.02	Property				Hampton Inn Port Arthur
16	Loan		RMF	RMF	Courtyard at Cedar Hills	133,261	12,692	24,833	2,150	0	3,263	0	0	0	0
17	Loan	31	GSMC	GSMC	Peckham Square	274	10,718	5,382	2,691	0	3,333	0	0	9,583	400,000
18	Loan	32, 33	CGMRC	CGMRC	Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center	0	31,637	0	0	0	2,126	51,014	75,000	0	75,000
18.01	Property	33			Mason Town House
18.02	Property	33			Park View Business Center
19	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	Dover Marketplace	87,649	10,956	2,067	1,034	0	1,461	50,000	0	4,167	150,000
20	Loan	34, 35	RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Lanier Crossing Shopping Center	137,523	11,460	22,513	2,501	0	1,375	82,502	0	5,500	198,005
21	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Waterway Shoppes II	116,424	12,320	26,184	6,234	0	523	18,814	351,608	0	200,000
22	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Avenue District Apartments	26,399	8,800	25,731	3,216	0	1,229	0	0	0	0
23	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	University Retail Portfolio	36,229	6,038	4,895	1,632	30,000	414	0	0	1,381	49,715
23.01	Property				517 Kirkwood Avenue
23.02	Property	36			501 East Green Street
23.03	Property				1801 West Tennessee Street
24	Loan		RMF	RMF	Carrollwood Village Shoppes	104,674	16,615	6,082	2,896	0	756	0	0	5,000	125,000
25	Loan		KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Plaza El Toro	36,877	7,376	11,967	1,028	0	1,288	0	100,000	3,334	200,000
26	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Barclay Village	120,831	13,426	7,366	1,841	0	4,271	153,738	0	0	0
27	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Plantation	132,912	18,083	16,192	2,570	0	15,035	0	0	0	0
28	Loan	37	GSMC	GSMC	Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar	56,315	11,263	11,979	1,996	0	15,583	0	0	0	0
29	Loan		RMF	RMF	Riverwalk Center	86,625	13,750	4,963	4,726	0	442	15,896	0	2,944	0
30	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Premiere Building	220,787	22,079	28,600	14,300	150,000	0	150,000	112,808	0	112,808
31	Loan	8, 38	CGMRC	CGMRC	TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio	57,257	14,314	31,791	3,532	376,970	14,251	0	0	0	0
31.01	Property				Keystone
31.02	Property				Park 100
32	Loan	8, 39, 40	CGMRC	CGMRC	Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky	75,087	6,826	9,389	4,695	0	0	0	0	0	0
33	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Anderson Oaks	148,553	16,506	23,208	3,315	0	3,306	0	0	0	0

A-21

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Upfront RE Tax Reserve ($)	Ongoing RE Tax Reserve ($)	Upfront Insurance Reserve ($)	Ongoing Insurance Reserve ($)	Upfront Replacement Reserve ($)	Ongoing Replacement Reserve ($)	Replacement Reserve Caps ($)	Upfront TI/LC Reserve ($)	Ongoing TI/LC Reserve ($)	TI/LC Caps ($)
34	Loan	41	CGMRC	CGMRC	Easy Stop Storage Portfolio	86,084	7,174	3,565	1,782	0	2,188	0	0	0	0
34.01	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop
34.02	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop
34.03	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial
35	Loan	42, 43	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Scott’s Edge Apartments	7,947	2,649	4,114	2,057	0	1,958	0	0	0	0
36	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Solomon CVS Portfolio	0	0	917	306	0	1,256	0	500,000	0	100,000
36.01	Property				CVS Brandon
36.02	Property				CVS Paris
36.03	Property				CVS Plano
37	Loan	8	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Westgate Plaza	59,425	11,885	3,653	1,827	0	1,540	0	0	4,167	300,000
38	Loan	8, 44	CGMRC	CGMRC	Residence Inn Southern Pines	3,961	3,961	0	0	0	8,227	0	0	0	0
39	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Imperial Landing Apartments	151,028	15,103	47,250	6,750	0	5,500	0	0	0	0
40	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Corporate Place	74,120	18,530	4,047	1,349	0	1,454	0	300,000	0	300,000
41	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Bricktown Shopping Center	71,514	22,703	2,661	2,534	0	1,215	58,337	0	3,241	200,000
42	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt John’s Creek	100,800	8,000	15,337	2,435	0	10,637	0	0	0	0
43	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Place Rogers	74,550	5,917	10,267	1,630	0	9,686	0	0	0	0
44	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	AR&C Storage	45,033	11,258	3,214	804	0	1,018	36,636	0	0	0
45	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages	33,829	3,222	34,231	2,508	0	7,456	0	0	0	0
46	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Renaissance Faire I	68,708	17,177	8,464	1,693	0	3,803	0	0	7,314	350,000
47	Loan		RMF	RMF	Cottages at White Oak	40,794	5,099	5,393	2,697	50,000	1,495	0	0	0	0
48	Loan	45	GSMC	GSMC	Village Square Shopping Center	65,652	9,379	0	0	0	1,797	0	0	3,750	180,000
49	Loan		RMF	RMF	Northstone Apartments	62,483	7,439	23,582	2,495	0	2,500	0	0	0	0
50	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Willow Park Apartments	55,974	6,219	28,490	2,590	0	4,427	0	0	0	0
51	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Cherry Creek	67,321	32,058	2,825	1,345	0	880	0	275,000	4,400	300,000
52	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Glenville Target Center	75,693	8,410	0	0	0	445	0	0	2,000	120,000
53	Loan	8, 46	RMF	RMF	Glades Tower II	29,945	4,753	4,190	1,995	0	335	0	30,000	3,750	150,000
54	Loan	47	RMF	RMF	Maximum Self Storage	16,570	3,945	1,539	733	95,926	0	0	0	0	0
55	Loan	8, 48	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Sonora Crossroads	18,390	3,678	6,241	780	0	576	0	35,000	1,417	85,000
56	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Albertson’s Retail Shops	7,858	3,742	6,334	1,005	0	284	13,646	0	1,232	59,136
57	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	210 Bedford Avenue	0	572	1,640	234	0	135	0	0	0	0
58	Loan		RMF	RMF	Capital Clifton Park Self Storage	4,220	4,019	3,161	753	0	845	30,402	0	167	6,000
59	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Hunters Pointe	7,103	3,551	5,925	988	100,000	1,500	0	0	0	0
60	Loan	49	GSMC	GSMC	AkzoNobel Coatings	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
61	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	4238 West Hundred Road	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
62	Loan	50, 51	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)	17,733	3,555	2,412	603	0	168	0	0	598	50,000
63	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Gardens of Victoria	48,833	4,883	0	0	0	1,430	0	0	0	0
64	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Woodview Commons	6,802	1,701	4,000	500	0	1,202	0	0	0	0

A-22

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Upfront Debt Service Reserve ($)	Ongoing Debt Service Reserve ($)	Upfront Deferred Maintenance Reserve ($)	Ongoing Deferred Maintenance Reserve ($)	Upfront Environmental Reserve ($)	Ongoing Environmental Reserve ($)	Upfront Other Reserve ($)	Ongoing Other Reserve ($)
1	Loan	8, 9, 10, 11, 12	CGMRC	CGMRC	Illinois Center	0	0	819,250	0	0	0	17,363,373	0
1.01	Property				111 East Wacker
1.02	Property				233 North Michigan Avenue
2	Loan	8, 13, 14, 15, 16	GSMC	GSMC	Hammons Hotel Portfolio	0	0	0	0	0	0	8,562,974	98,159
2.01	Property	17			Embassy Suites Concord, NC
2.02	Property				Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN
2.03	Property				Embassy Suites Norman, OK
2.04	Property	15			Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX
2.05	Property	15, 18			Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ
2.06	Property				Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL
2.07	Property	15			Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO
3	Loan	19, 20	CGMRC	CGMRC	The Decoration & Design Building	0	0	165,850	0	0	0	318,750	318,750
4	Loan	21	GSMC	GSMC	Hamilton Landing	0	0	131,272	0	0	0	1,346,245	0
5	Loan	8, 22, 23	GSMC	GSMC	Courtyard Sunnyvale	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
6	Loan	8, 24, 25	RMF	RMF	Somerset Park Apartments	0	0	0	0	1,875	0	0	0
7	Loan	8, 26, 27	RMF	RMF	Greylyn Business Park	0	0	15,625	0	0	0	0	0
8	Loan	8, 28	GSMC	GSMC	Pavilion Jenkintown	0	0	497,885	0	0	0	54,167	0
9	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	University Place	0	0	10,625	0	0	0	4,005,545	0
10	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
10.01	Property				Dale Avenue Roanoke
10.02	Property				Plantation Road Walmart
10.03	Property				Walmart Orange Avenue
11	Loan	8, 29	CGMRC	CGMRC	Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio	0	0	0	0	0	0	800,000	0
11.01	Property				Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills
11.02	Property				Compass Self Storage Novi
11.03	Property				Compass Self Storage Madison Heights
12	Loan	30	GSMC	GSMC	Mix at Midtown	0	0	28,600	0	0	0	71,784	0
13	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Red Dot Storage Portfolio	0	0	210,284	0	0	0	0	0
13.01	Property				Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL
13.02	Property				Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL
13.03	Property				Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL
13.04	Property				Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL
13.05	Property				Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI
13.06	Property				Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL
13.07	Property				Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI
13.08	Property				Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL
13.09	Property				Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL
14	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Stadium Plaza	0	0	0	0	0	0	500,000	0
15	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Houston Hotel Portfolio	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
15.01	Property				Holiday Inn Express West Road
15.02	Property				Hampton Inn Port Arthur
16	Loan		RMF	RMF	Courtyard at Cedar Hills	0	0	4,563	0	0	0	0	0
17	Loan	31	GSMC	GSMC	Peckham Square	0	0	93,151	0	0	0	130,000	0
18	Loan	32, 33	CGMRC	CGMRC	Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center	0	0	0	0	40,000	0	0	0
18.01	Property	33			Mason Town House
18.02	Property	33			Park View Business Center
19	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	Dover Marketplace	0	0	0	0	0	0	6,323	0
20	Loan	34, 35	RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Lanier Crossing Shopping Center	0	0	29,581	0	0	0	329,739	2,962
21	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Waterway Shoppes II	0	0	7,500	0	0	0	187,390	0
22	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Avenue District Apartments	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
23	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	University Retail Portfolio	0	0	7,063	0	0	0	0	0
23.01	Property				517 Kirkwood Avenue
23.02	Property	36			501 East Green Street
23.03	Property				1801 West Tennessee Street
24	Loan		RMF	RMF	Carrollwood Village Shoppes	0	0	3,163	0	0	0	32,858	0
25	Loan		KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Plaza El Toro	0	0	1,250	0	0	0	7,535	0
26	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Barclay Village	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
27	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Plantation	0	0	0	0	0	0	2,256,909	0
28	Loan	37	GSMC	GSMC	Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
29	Loan		RMF	RMF	Riverwalk Center	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
30	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Premiere Building	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
31	Loan	8, 38	CGMRC	CGMRC	TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio	0	0	49,750	0	0	0	983,607	0
31.01	Property				Keystone
31.02	Property				Park 100
32	Loan	8, 39, 40	CGMRC	CGMRC	Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky	0	0	0	0	0	0	990,871	0
33	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Anderson Oaks	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

A-23

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Upfront Debt Service Reserve ($)	Ongoing Debt Service Reserve ($)	Upfront Deferred Maintenance Reserve ($)	Ongoing Deferred Maintenance Reserve ($)	Upfront Environmental Reserve ($)	Ongoing Environmental Reserve ($)	Upfront Other Reserve ($)	Ongoing Other Reserve ($)
34	Loan	41	CGMRC	CGMRC	Easy Stop Storage Portfolio	0	0	44,644	0	0	0	200,000	0
34.01	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop
34.02	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop
34.03	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial
35	Loan	42, 43	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Scott’s Edge Apartments	0	0	0	0	51,750	0	5,000	0
36	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Solomon CVS Portfolio	0	0	8,250	0	0	0	0	0
36.01	Property				CVS Brandon
36.02	Property				CVS Paris
36.03	Property				CVS Plano
37	Loan	8	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Westgate Plaza	0	0	12,500	0	0	0	11,250	0
38	Loan	8, 44	CGMRC	CGMRC	Residence Inn Southern Pines	0	0	0	0	0	0	362,200	0
39	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Imperial Landing Apartments	0	0	154,000	0	0	0	0	0
40	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Corporate Place	0	0	65,625	0	0	0	18,150	0
41	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Bricktown Shopping Center	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
42	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt John’s Creek	0	0	91,971	0	0	0	1,829,775	0
43	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Place Rogers	0	0	7,694	0	0	0	1,707,719	0
44	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	AR&C Storage	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
45	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages	0	0	0	0	0	0	100,000	0
46	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Renaissance Faire I	0	0	7,500	0	0	0	650,000	0
47	Loan		RMF	RMF	Cottages at White Oak	0	0	3,500	0	0	0	0	0
48	Loan	45	GSMC	GSMC	Village Square Shopping Center	0	0	0	0	0	0	65,000	7,917
49	Loan		RMF	RMF	Northstone Apartments	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
50	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Willow Park Apartments	0	0	10,625	0	0	0	0	0
51	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Cherry Creek	0	0	79,656	0	0	0	0	0
52	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Glenville Target Center	0	0	0	0	0	0	385,155	0
53	Loan	8, 46	RMF	RMF	Glades Tower II	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
54	Loan	47	RMF	RMF	Maximum Self Storage	0	0	11,250	0	0	0	0	0
55	Loan	8, 48	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Sonora Crossroads	0	0	3,125	0	0	0	42,520	0
56	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Albertson’s Retail Shops	0	0	46,875	0	0	0	34,722	0
57	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	210 Bedford Avenue	0	0	9,625	0	0	0	6,400	0
58	Loan		RMF	RMF	Capital Clifton Park Self Storage	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
59	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Hunters Pointe	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
60	Loan	49	GSMC	GSMC	AkzoNobel Coatings	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
61	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	4238 West Hundred Road	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
62	Loan	50, 51	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)	0	0	0	0	0	0	83,000	0
63	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Gardens of Victoria	0	0	61,563	0	0	0	0	0
64	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Woodview Commons	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

A-24

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Other Reserve Description	Borrower Name	Delaware Statutory Trust? Y/N
1	Loan	8, 9, 10, 11, 12	CGMRC	CGMRC	Illinois Center	Rent Concessions Reserve ($9,522,057.69); Unfunded Obligations ($7,841,314.87)	IC 233 Building Company LLC and IC 111 Building Company LLC	No
1.01	Property				111 East Wacker
1.02	Property				233 North Michigan Avenue
2	Loan	8, 13, 14, 15, 16	GSMC	GSMC	Hammons Hotel Portfolio	PIP Reserve ($5,000,000 Renaissance Glendale, AZ, $1,940,000 Courtyard Allen, TX, $950,000 Residence Inn Kansas City, MO); Upfront Ground Rent Reserve ($672,974) and Monthly Ground Rent Reserve ($98,159)	JQH-Allen Development, LLC, JQH-Concord Development, LLC, JQH-Glendale, AZ Development, LLC, Hammons of Huntsville, LLC, JQH-Kansas City Development, LLC, JQH-Murfreesboro Development, LLC and JQH-Norman Development, LLC	No
2.01	Property	17			Embassy Suites Concord, NC
2.02	Property				Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN
2.03	Property				Embassy Suites Norman, OK
2.04	Property	15			Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX
2.05	Property	15, 18			Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ
2.06	Property				Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL
2.07	Property	15			Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO
3	Loan	19, 20	CGMRC	CGMRC	The Decoration & Design Building	Ground Lease Reserve	D&D Building Company LLC	No
4	Loan	21	GSMC	GSMC	Hamilton Landing	Unfunded Obligations Reserve	HL Novato, LLC	No
5	Loan	8, 22, 23	GSMC	GSMC	Courtyard Sunnyvale		T Alliance Three - Sunnyvale, LLC	No
6	Loan	8, 24, 25	RMF	RMF	Somerset Park Apartments		Troy Apts I, LLC, Troy Apts II, LLC, Troy Apts III, LLC and Troy Apts IV, LLC	No
7	Loan	8, 26, 27	RMF	RMF	Greylyn Business Park		Greylyn BP, LLC	No
8	Loan	8, 28	GSMC	GSMC	Pavilion Jenkintown	Unfunded Obligations Reserve	Pavilion Unit Acquisition LP	No
9	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	University Place	Unfunded Obligations Reserve ($2,088,970); AMC Holdback ($1,700,000);  Gap Rent Reserve ($216,575)	University Place Improvements Owner LLC	No
10	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio		Hollywood WNM Dale, LLC, Hollywood WNM Orange LLC and Hollywood WNM Plantation, LLC	No
10.01	Property				Dale Avenue Roanoke
10.02	Property				Plantation Road Walmart
10.03	Property				Walmart Orange Avenue
11	Loan	8, 29	CGMRC	CGMRC	Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio	Economic Holdback	Amsdell Storage Ventures I, LLC	No
11.01	Property				Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills
11.02	Property				Compass Self Storage Novi
11.03	Property				Compass Self Storage Madison Heights
12	Loan	30	GSMC	GSMC	Mix at Midtown	Existing Casualty Reserve	3201 Louisiana, LP	No
13	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Red Dot Storage Portfolio		Red Dot Storage 1 (Sandy Hollow-Rockford), LLC, Red Dot Storage 2, LLC, Red Dot Storage 3, LLC, Red Dot Storage 5, LLC, Red Dot Storage 6, LLC, Red Dot Storage 7, LLC, Red Dot Storage 10, LLC, Red Dot Storage 11, LLC and Red Dot Storage 12, LLC	No
13.01	Property				Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL
13.02	Property				Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL
13.03	Property				Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL
13.04	Property				Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL
13.05	Property				Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI
13.06	Property				Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL
13.07	Property				Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI
13.08	Property				Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL
13.09	Property				Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL
14	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Stadium Plaza	Specified Tenant Reserve	Stadium Plaza Shopping Center, LLC	No
15	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Houston Hotel Portfolio		West Road Hotel Partners, Ltd. and White Flint Partners, Ltd.	No
15.01	Property				Holiday Inn Express West Road
15.02	Property				Hampton Inn Port Arthur
16	Loan		RMF	RMF	Courtyard at Cedar Hills		Virtu Courtyard Owner, LLC and Virtu Courtyard Associates, LP	No
17	Loan	31	GSMC	GSMC	Peckham Square	Unfunded Obligations Reserve	Peckham PH, LLC and Peckham KF, LLC	No
18	Loan	32, 33	CGMRC	CGMRC	Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center		JLAR Illinois, LLC	No
18.01	Property	33			Mason Town House
18.02	Property	33			Park View Business Center
19	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	Dover Marketplace	Rent Concession Reserve	Dover GF, LP	No
20	Loan	34, 35	RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Lanier Crossing Shopping Center	Roof Replacement Reserve ($311,966); Tenant Rollover Reserve ($17,773)	96-07 37th Ave. LLC	No
21	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Waterway Shoppes II	Free Rent Reserve	Waterways Shoppes II, LLLP	No
22	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Avenue District Apartments		Avenue Developers LLC	No
23	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	University Retail Portfolio		Illini Retail Investors, LLC, Hoosier Retail Investors, LLC and Seminole Retail Investors, LLC	No
23.01	Property				517 Kirkwood Avenue
23.02	Property	36			501 East Green Street
23.03	Property				1801 West Tennessee Street
24	Loan		RMF	RMF	Carrollwood Village Shoppes	Outstanding TI Reserve	Carrollwood V Group LLC	No
25	Loan		KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Plaza El Toro	Unfunded Obligations Reserve	Plaza El Toro Investors Limited Partnership	No
26	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Barclay Village		Barclay Cascade Investors LLC	No
27	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Plantation	PIP Reserve ($2,003,902); Seasonality Reserve ($253,007)	Lauderdale Partners, LLC	No
28	Loan	37	GSMC	GSMC	Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar		Torrey Inn LP	No
29	Loan		RMF	RMF	Riverwalk Center		ESJ Riverwalk Jupiter, LLC	No
30	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Premiere Building		Murray Family Associates LLP	No
31	Loan	8, 38	CGMRC	CGMRC	TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio	PIP Reserve	Seal Keystone, LLC and Seal Park 100, LLC	No
31.01	Property				Keystone
31.02	Property				Park 100
32	Loan	8, 39, 40	CGMRC	CGMRC	Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky	PIP Reserve	Newport CIS Hotel Partners, LLC	No
33	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Anderson Oaks		9219 Anderson, LLC	No

A-25

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Other Reserve Description	Borrower Name	Delaware Statutory Trust? Y/N
34	Loan	41	CGMRC	CGMRC	Easy Stop Storage Portfolio	Earn Out Reserve	SEG Portfolio LLC	No
34.01	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop
34.02	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop
34.03	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial
35	Loan	42, 43	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Scott’s Edge Apartments	Put Reserve	Moore Street Apartments, LLC	No
36	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Solomon CVS Portfolio		Anthony Solomon LLC, Samurai Solomon LLC, M Muffin LLC, Anthony Solomon 2 LLC, Samurai Solomon 2 LLC, M Muffin 2 LLC and GS Brandon LLC	No
36.01	Property				CVS Brandon
36.02	Property				CVS Paris
36.03	Property				CVS Plano
37	Loan	8	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Westgate Plaza	Unfunded Obligations Reserve	La Sierra Investors, a California Limited Partnership	No
38	Loan	8, 44	CGMRC	CGMRC	Residence Inn Southern Pines	PIP Reserve ($359,700); Comfort Letter Transfer Reserve ($2,500)	RISP Holding LLC	No
39	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Imperial Landing Apartments		16001 Cotillion Apartments, LP	No
40	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Corporate Place	Weber Wood TI Allowance	Corporate Place Cleveland LP	No
41	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Bricktown Shopping Center		Bricktown Plaza Associates	No
42	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt John’s Creek	PIP Reserve	The Lanier Group, LLC	No
43	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Place Rogers	PIP Reserve ($1,634,166); Seasonality Reserve ($73,554)	Rogers Lodging, LLC	No
44	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	AR&C Storage		AR & C Hamilton, LLC	No
45	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages	Seasonality Reserve	Lady Lake Hotel, LLC	No
46	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Renaissance Faire I	Outstanding TI Reserve	RFLP Subsidiary, LLC	No
47	Loan		RMF	RMF	Cottages at White Oak		Troutman Cottages, Inc.	No
48	Loan	45	GSMC	GSMC	Village Square Shopping Center	Monthly Bi-Lo Rollover Reserve ($7,916.67); Unfunded Obligations ($65,000)	Lexington (Village) UY, LLC	No
49	Loan		RMF	RMF	Northstone Apartments		Kuwa, LLC	No
50	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Willow Park Apartments		Willowpark Associates, LLC	No
51	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Cherry Creek		Cherry Creek Investors, LLC	No
52	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Glenville Target Center	H&R Block Holdback Reserve($340,000), Unfunded Obligation Reserve ($45,155)	MFB Glenville Owner LLC	No
53	Loan	8, 46	RMF	RMF	Glades Tower II		L&R Real Estate Ventures, LLC	No
54	Loan	47	RMF	RMF	Maximum Self Storage		Paradise Storage Partners, LLLP	No
55	Loan	8, 48	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Sonora Crossroads	Unfunded Obligations Reserve	Sonora 3, LLC	No
56	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Albertson’s Retail Shops	Free Rent Reserve	Albertsons Village Pueblo, LLC	No
57	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	210 Bedford Avenue	Residential Tenant Reserve	210 Bedford Owners LLC	No
58	Loan		RMF	RMF	Capital Clifton Park Self Storage		Commando Capital LLC	No
59	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Hunters Pointe		Hunter’s Pointe, Ltd.	No
60	Loan	49	GSMC	GSMC	AkzoNobel Coatings		Natash Strongsville, LLC	No
61	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	4238 West Hundred Road		West Hundred Road Realty, LLC	No
62	Loan	50, 51	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)	Bigoudi Lease Reserve ($50,000); Elite Performance Lease Reserve ($33,000)	SAS Woodland Hills, LLC	No
63	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Gardens of Victoria		Gardens of Victoria, LLC	No
64	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Woodview Commons		Woodview Apartments Partnership, LLC	No

A-26

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Carve-out Guarantor	Loan Purpose	Loan Amount (sources) ($)	Principal’s New Cash Contribution (7) ($)
1	Loan	8, 9, 10, 11, 12	CGMRC	CGMRC	Illinois Center	Michael Karfunkel	Acquisition	260,000,000	139,713,237
1.01	Property				111 East Wacker
1.02	Property				233 North Michigan Avenue
2	Loan	8, 13, 14, 15, 16	GSMC	GSMC	Hammons Hotel Portfolio	Revocable Trust of John Q. Hammons, Dated December 28, 1989, as Amended and Restated	Refinance	250,800,000	0
2.01	Property	17			Embassy Suites Concord, NC
2.02	Property				Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN
2.03	Property				Embassy Suites Norman, OK
2.04	Property	15			Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX
2.05	Property	15, 18			Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ
2.06	Property				Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL
2.07	Property	15			Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO
3	Loan	19, 20	CGMRC	CGMRC	The Decoration & Design Building	Charles S. Cohen	Refinance	165,000,000	0
4	Loan	21	GSMC	GSMC	Hamilton Landing	Todd M. Gooding, ScanlanKemperBard Companies, LLC and Robert D. Scanlan	Acquisition	60,000,000	29,657,931
5	Loan	8, 22, 23	GSMC	GSMC	Courtyard Sunnyvale	Mayur B. Patel Family Trust Dated April 1, 2002 and Mayur B. Patel	Refinance	40,600,000	0
6	Loan	8, 24, 25	RMF	RMF	Somerset Park Apartments	Marc S. Solomon and Mark S. Rosen	Acquisition	180,000,000	65,943,738
7	Loan	8, 26, 27	RMF	RMF	Greylyn Business Park	Legacy Properties Group, Inc., James A. Asher and Anthony J. Asher	Acquisition	35,625,000	7,176,716
8	Loan	8, 28	GSMC	GSMC	Pavilion Jenkintown	Arnold Galman	Refinance	31,270,000	0
9	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	University Place	Adam W. Ifshin	Refinance	28,000,000	1,017,744
10	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio	Kenneth Shimm	Acquisition	26,046,472	8,865,612
10.01	Property				Dale Avenue Roanoke
10.02	Property				Plantation Road Walmart
10.03	Property				Walmart Orange Avenue
11	Loan	8, 29	CGMRC	CGMRC	Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio	Robert J. Amsdell and Barry L. Amsdell	Refinance	21,000,000	0
11.01	Property				Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills
11.02	Property				Compass Self Storage Novi
11.03	Property				Compass Self Storage Madison Heights
12	Loan	30	GSMC	GSMC	Mix at Midtown	George Levan, John Levan and Levan Group I, LP	Refinance	19,500,000	0
13	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Red Dot Storage Portfolio	Seth Bent	Refinance	16,000,000	0
13.01	Property				Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL
13.02	Property				Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL
13.03	Property				Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL
13.04	Property				Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL
13.05	Property				Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI
13.06	Property				Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL
13.07	Property				Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI
13.08	Property				Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL
13.09	Property				Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL
14	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Stadium Plaza	Vicki D. Walters	Refinance	15,500,000	1,110,338
15	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Houston Hotel Portfolio	Seema Dayal and Jayesh Dayal	Refinance	14,000,000	0
15.01	Property				Holiday Inn Express West Road
15.02	Property				Hampton Inn Port Arthur
16	Loan		RMF	RMF	Courtyard at Cedar Hills	Michael Rhodes Green, Scott Michael McWhorter and Virtu Investments Multifamily Opportunity Fund-III, LP	Acquisition	13,000,000	7,068,021
17	Loan	31	GSMC	GSMC	Peckham Square	Kamran Farhadi and Parviz M. Hariri	Refinance	12,450,000	0
18	Loan	32, 33	CGMRC	CGMRC	Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center	James C. Mason and Linda R. Mason	Refinance	11,700,000	0
18.01	Property	33			Mason Town House
18.02	Property	33			Park View Business Center
19	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	Dover Marketplace	Robert V. Gothier, Sr., Dennis J. Schmidt, Kevin J. Nielsen and Robert V. Gothier, Jr.	Refinance	11,250,000	0
20	Loan	34, 35	RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Lanier Crossing Shopping Center	David Sedgh and Jeffrey Brandler	Refinance	11,200,000	0
21	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Waterway Shoppes II	Barry J. Belmont	Refinance	11,000,000	456,870
22	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Avenue District Apartments	Timothy Zaremba, Alfred Geis and Anthony Panzica	Refinance	10,600,000	0
23	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	University Retail Portfolio	David E. Salmanson, David E. Salmanson and Jay N. Rosenstein, as Trustees of the David E. Salmanson GST Exempt Trust-2007 and David E. Salmanson and Jay N. Rosenstein, as Trustees of the David E. Salmanson GST Exempt Trust-2015	Acquisition	10,346,000	7,191,673
23.01	Property				517 Kirkwood Avenue
23.02	Property	36			501 East Green Street
23.03	Property				1801 West Tennessee Street
24	Loan		RMF	RMF	Carrollwood Village Shoppes	Jorge Gleizer	Acquisition	10,275,000	3,868,400
25	Loan		KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Plaza El Toro	Hsien Bing Wang	Refinance	10,000,000	0
26	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Barclay Village	Samuel K. Beler, Gary V. Guarisco and Samuel K. Beler, as Trustee of the Survivors Trust of the Samuel K. Beler 1992 Family Trust UDT 9/30/1992	Refinance	9,800,000	0
27	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Plantation	Robert E. Mason	Refinance	9,480,000	3,512,169
28	Loan	37	GSMC	GSMC	Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar	Giuseppe Simone	Refinance	9,250,000	0
29	Loan		RMF	RMF	Riverwalk Center	Gabriel Amiel and Arnaud Sitbon	Acquisition	9,100,000	3,272,288
30	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Premiere Building	Kenneth Israel	Refinance	9,000,000	1,003,097
31	Loan	8, 38	CGMRC	CGMRC	TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio	Vamsikrishna Bonthala and Sheenal Patel	Acquisition	9,000,000	6,240,000
31.01	Property				Keystone
31.02	Property				Park 100
32	Loan	8, 39, 40	CGMRC	CGMRC	Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky	Andy Chopra, Rakesh Chauhan and Manoj Chauhan	Acquisition	8,300,000	4,106,512
33	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Anderson Oaks	Hal Lashlee and Hal Lashlee, Trustee of The Hal Lashlee Living Trust Dated 10/18/84, As Amended	Acquisition	8,200,000	3,646,194

A-27

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number	Loan /  Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Carve-out Guarantor	Loan Purpose	Loan Amount (sources) ($)	Principal’s New Cash Contribution (7) ($)
34	Loan	41	CGMRC	CGMRC	Easy Stop Storage Portfolio	Rodney Franklin, Robert Franklin, David L. Vermillion, Devin J. Ringling, Paul F. Chebib, Robyn N. Cogburn and Ryan Ratliff	Refinance	8,200,000	0
34.01	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop
34.02	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop
34.03	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial
35	Loan	42, 43	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Scott’s Edge Apartments	Gerald A. Peters and James B. Edge, Jr.	Refinance	8,150,000	1,368,954
36	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Solomon CVS Portfolio	Gary Solomon, Anthony Solomon and Robin Solomon	Refinance	8,000,000	336,880
36.01	Property				CVS Brandon
36.02	Property				CVS Paris
36.03	Property				CVS Plano
37	Loan	8	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Westgate Plaza	Hsien Bing Wang	Refinance	7,700,000	0
38	Loan	8, 44	CGMRC	CGMRC	Residence Inn Southern Pines	Brian Patrick Martin, Ira Mondry and Edward Herrick	Refinance	7,350,000	0
39	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Imperial Landing Apartments	Gregory S. Nelson, Irving A. Wolf and Dany Bonapace	Refinance	7,300,000	0
40	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Corporate Place	Raymond Massa	Acquisition	7,012,500	2,865,163
41	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Bricktown Shopping Center	Michael Polimeni, Jay Koenigsberg and Bennet Grutman	Refinance	7,000,000	0
42	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt John’s Creek	Robert E. Mason	Refinance	6,950,000	4,181,588
43	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Place Rogers	Robert E. Mason	Refinance	6,890,000	5,023,446
44	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	AR&C Storage	Alexander Mark Schobel, Gordon Sulcer, Robert Erck and Carl Fischer	Refinance	6,600,000	0
45	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages	Punit Shah	Refinance	6,400,000	0
46	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Renaissance Faire I	Joel S. Lee	Refinance	6,300,000	0
47	Loan		RMF	RMF	Cottages at White Oak	Lee Troutman	Refinance	5,650,000	0
48	Loan	45	GSMC	GSMC	Village Square Shopping Center	Stanley Werb and Jonathan Gaines	Refinance	5,600,000	273,907
49	Loan		RMF	RMF	Northstone Apartments	Eric Clauson	Refinance	5,500,000	0
50	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Willow Park Apartments	C. Robert Nicolls, II	Refinance	5,400,000	0
51	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Cherry Creek	Brent Seiler	Acquisition	5,200,000	1,875,944
52	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Glenville Target Center	Richard Birdoff	Refinance	4,900,000	0
53	Loan	8, 46	RMF	RMF	Glades Tower II	Charles M. Linke and Christopher A. Richardson	Refinance	4,300,000	0
54	Loan	47	RMF	RMF	Maximum Self Storage	Richard A. Graham, Jr.	Acquisition	4,275,000	1,590,799
55	Loan	8, 48	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Sonora Crossroads	Massoud Ghomizadeh, Behrooz Katirai and Ali Ghomizadeh	Refinance	4,025,000	629,135
56	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Albertson’s Retail Shops	Joseph M. Harris, Jr.	Refinance	4,000,000	0
57	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	210 Bedford Avenue	Ralph Sitt	Acquisition	3,750,000	2,415,711
58	Loan		RMF	RMF	Capital Clifton Park Self Storage	Robert Moser and Robert Morgan	Refinance	3,680,000	0
59	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Hunters Pointe	Jonathan Berns	Refinance	3,400,000	0
60	Loan	49	GSMC	GSMC	AkzoNobel Coatings	Ed Natan and Asher Hyman	Acquisition	3,200,000	1,978,591
61	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	4238 West Hundred Road	George A. Morgan, Jr.	Refinance	3,037,000	0
62	Loan	50, 51	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)	Dr. Soheil Alexander Soleimani, DMD	Recapitalization	2,233,000	0
63	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Gardens of Victoria	Howard Yates and Mark Yates	Acquisition	2,006,250	767,763
64	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Woodview Commons	Jonathan Berns and Edward B. Schwartz	Refinance	1,600,000	0

A-28

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control  Number	Loan /  Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Subordinate Debt ($)	Other Sources ($)	Total Sources ($)	Loan Payoff ($)	Purchase Price ($)	Closing Costs ($)	Reserves ($)	Principal Equity Distribution ($)	Other Uses ($)	Total Uses ($)
1	Loan	8, 9, 10, 11, 12	CGMRC	CGMRC	Illinois Center	0	15,081,343	414,794,580	0	376,000,000	6,189,058	32,605,522	0	0	414,794,580
1.01	Property				111 East Wacker
1.02	Property				233 North Michigan Avenue
2	Loan	8, 13, 14, 15, 16	GSMC	GSMC	Hammons Hotel Portfolio	0	0	250,800,000	214,972,179	0	3,627,650	11,735,456	20,464,715	0	250,800,000
2.01	Property	17			Embassy Suites Concord, NC
2.02	Property				Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN
2.03	Property				Embassy Suites Norman, OK
2.04	Property	15			Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX
2.05	Property	15, 18			Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ
2.06	Property				Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL
2.07	Property	15			Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO
3	Loan	19, 20	CGMRC	CGMRC	The Decoration & Design Building	0	115,000	165,115,000	127,315,231	0	3,483,536	2,613,573	31,702,659	0	165,115,000
4	Loan	21	GSMC	GSMC	Hamilton Landing	0	0	89,657,931	0	84,000,000	482,068	5,175,863	0	0	89,657,931
5	Loan	8, 22, 23	GSMC	GSMC	Courtyard Sunnyvale	0	0	40,600,000	16,613,607	0	431,571	146,129	23,408,693	0	40,600,000
6	Loan	8, 24, 25	RMF	RMF	Somerset Park Apartments	0	0	245,943,738	0	216,000,000	2,769,148	27,174,590	0	0	245,943,738
7	Loan	8, 26, 27	RMF	RMF	Greylyn Business Park	5,375,000	55,000	48,231,716	0	46,000,000	714,453	1,517,263	0	0	48,231,716
8	Loan	8, 28	GSMC	GSMC	Pavilion Jenkintown	0	0	31,270,000	26,341,388	0	908,270	802,052	3,218,290	0	31,270,000
9	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	University Place	0	90,000	29,107,744	24,057,259	0	452,567	4,597,917	0	0	29,107,744
10	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio	0	411,372	35,323,456	0	34,728,629	594,827	0	0	0	35,323,456
10.01	Property				Dale Avenue Roanoke
10.02	Property				Plantation Road Walmart
10.03	Property				Walmart Orange Avenue
11	Loan	8, 29	CGMRC	CGMRC	Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio	0	60,000	21,060,000	8,751,298	0	425,770	819,297	11,063,635	0	21,060,000
11.01	Property				Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills
11.02	Property				Compass Self Storage Novi
11.03	Property				Compass Self Storage Madison Heights
12	Loan	30	GSMC	GSMC	Mix at Midtown	0	0	19,500,000	9,894,510	0	285,752	206,695	9,113,043	0	19,500,000
13	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Red Dot Storage Portfolio	0	52,517	16,052,517	13,133,600	0	561,671	269,068	2,088,178	0	16,052,517
13.01	Property				Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL
13.02	Property				Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL
13.03	Property				Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL
13.04	Property				Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL
13.05	Property				Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI
13.06	Property				Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL
13.07	Property				Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI
13.08	Property				Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL
13.09	Property				Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL
14	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Stadium Plaza	0	37,500	16,647,838	15,575,278	0	219,006	853,555	0	0	16,647,838
15	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Houston Hotel Portfolio	0	972	14,000,972	12,954,185	0	283,976	289,236	473,575	0	14,000,972
15.01	Property				Holiday Inn Express West Road
15.02	Property				Hampton Inn Port Arthur
16	Loan		RMF	RMF	Courtyard at Cedar Hills	0	160,000	20,228,021	0	19,850,000	215,364	162,657	0	0	20,228,021
17	Loan	31	GSMC	GSMC	Peckham Square	0	0	12,450,000	11,039,934	0	317,085	228,807	864,174	0	12,450,000
18	Loan	32, 33	CGMRC	CGMRC	Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center	0	45,000	11,745,000	10,836,000	0	455,740	115,000	338,259	0	11,745,000
18.01	Property	33			Mason Town House
18.02	Property	33			Park View Business Center
19	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	Dover Marketplace	0	0	11,250,000	7,366,389	0	205,073	96,039	3,582,499	0	11,250,000
20	Loan	34, 35	RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Lanier Crossing Shopping Center	0	0	11,200,000	9,187,769	0	331,275	519,356	1,161,601	0	11,200,000
21	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Waterway Shoppes II	0	30,000	11,486,870	10,477,757	0	320,007	689,106	0	0	11,486,870
22	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Avenue District Apartments	0	0	10,600,000	7,890,003	0	235,631	52,130	2,422,236	0	10,600,000
23	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	University Retail Portfolio	0	0	17,537,673	0	17,050,000	409,486	78,187	0	0	17,537,673
23.01	Property				517 Kirkwood Avenue
23.02	Property	36			501 East Green Street
23.03	Property				1801 West Tennessee Street
24	Loan		RMF	RMF	Carrollwood Village Shoppes	0	10,000	14,153,400	0	13,700,000	306,624	146,776	0	0	14,153,400
25	Loan		KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Plaza El Toro	0	0	10,000,000	8,063,792	0	353,658	157,629	1,424,921	0	10,000,000
26	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Barclay Village	0	0	9,800,000	8,000,483	0	224,544	128,197	1,446,777	0	9,800,000
27	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Plantation	0	30,000	13,022,169	10,296,478	0	319,678	2,406,013	0	0	13,022,169
28	Loan	37	GSMC	GSMC	Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar	0	0	9,250,000	6,647,177	0	227,873	68,293	2,306,657	0	9,250,000
29	Loan		RMF	RMF	Riverwalk Center	0	35,000	12,407,288	0	12,000,000	315,700	91,588	0	0	12,407,288
30	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Premiere Building	0	30,000	10,033,097	9,374,513	0	146,388	512,196	0	0	10,033,097
31	Loan	8, 38	CGMRC	CGMRC	TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio	0	202,129	15,442,129	0	13,000,000	942,754	1,499,375	0	0	15,442,129
31.01	Property				Keystone
31.02	Property				Park 100
32	Loan	8, 39, 40	CGMRC	CGMRC	Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky	0	54,523	12,461,035	0	11,135,000	250,688	1,075,347	0	0	12,461,035
33	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Anderson Oaks	0	0	11,846,194	0	11,500,000	174,433	171,761	0	0	11,846,194

A-29

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Subordinate Debt ($)	Other Sources ($)	Total Sources ($)	Loan Payoff ($)	Purchase Price ($)	Closing Costs ($)	Reserves ($)	Principal Equity  Distribution ($)	Other Uses ($)	Total Uses ($)
34	Loan	41	CGMRC	CGMRC	Easy Stop Storage Portfolio	0	47,000	8,247,000	4,520,856	0	216,118	334,293	3,175,733	0	8,247,000
34.01	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop
34.02	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop
34.03	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial
35	Loan	42, 43	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Scott’s Edge Apartments	0	0	9,518,954	9,168,257	0	281,886	68,811	0	0	9,518,954
36	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Solomon CVS Portfolio	0	75,000	8,411,880	7,691,784	0	210,930	509,167	0	0	8,411,880
36.01	Property				CVS Brandon
36.02	Property				CVS Paris
36.03	Property				CVS Plano
37	Loan	8	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Westgate Plaza	0	0	7,700,000	6,431,834	0	331,396	86,828	849,942	0	7,700,000
38	Loan	8, 44	CGMRC	CGMRC	Residence Inn Southern Pines	0	40,000	7,390,000	6,302,052	0	259,035	366,161	462,751	0	7,390,000
39	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Imperial Landing Apartments	0	30,000	7,330,000	6,463,264	0	214,268	352,278	300,190	0	7,330,000
40	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Corporate Place	0	217,332	10,094,995	0	9,350,000	283,052	461,943	0	0	10,094,995
41	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Bricktown Shopping Center	0	35,000	7,035,000	3,778,981	0	277,686	74,175	2,904,158	0	7,035,000
42	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt John’s Creek	0	30,000	11,161,588	8,848,766	0	274,939	2,037,883	0	0	11,161,588
43	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Place Rogers	0	30,000	11,943,446	9,877,257	0	265,959	1,800,230	0	0	11,943,446
44	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	AR&C Storage	0	9,312	6,609,312	5,252,155	0	157,045	48,247	1,151,865	0	6,609,312
45	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages	0	40,000	6,440,000	2,440,990	0	167,259	168,060	3,663,690	0	6,440,000
46	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Renaissance Faire I	0	0	6,300,000	3,704,895	0	206,097	734,673	1,654,335	0	6,300,000
47	Loan		RMF	RMF	Cottages at White Oak	0	30,000	5,680,000	5,376,471	0	194,387	99,687	9,454	0	5,680,000
48	Loan	45	GSMC	GSMC	Village Square Shopping Center	0	0	5,873,907	5,652,455	0	90,801	130,652	0	0	5,873,907
49	Loan		RMF	RMF	Northstone Apartments	0	35,000	5,535,000	5,027,303	0	208,930	86,065	212,701	0	5,535,000
50	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Willow Park Apartments	0	47,500	5,447,500	4,938,986	0	122,507	95,089	290,918	0	5,447,500
51	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Cherry Creek	0	45,000	7,120,944	0	6,500,000	196,141	424,803	0	0	7,120,944
52	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Glenville Target Center	0	25,000	4,925,000	2,298,969	0	117,354	460,848	2,047,830	0	4,925,000
53	Loan	8, 46	RMF	RMF	Glades Tower II	0	35,000	4,335,000	3,928,036	0	269,330	64,135	73,499	0	4,335,000
54	Loan	47	RMF	RMF	Maximum Self Storage	0	77,750	5,943,549	0	5,700,000	118,264	125,285	0	0	5,943,549
55	Loan	8, 48	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Sonora Crossroads	0	0	4,654,135	4,380,145	0	168,714	105,276	0	0	4,654,135
56	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Albertson’s Retail Shops	0	30,000	4,030,000	3,506,150	0	109,793	95,789	318,268	0	4,030,000
57	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	210 Bedford Avenue	0	27,088	6,192,798	0	5,983,725	191,409	17,665	0	0	6,192,798
58	Loan		RMF	RMF	Capital Clifton Park Self Storage	0	0	3,680,000	3,151,623	0	185,005	7,381	335,991	0	3,680,000
59	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Hunters Pointe	0	0	3,400,000	2,951,130	0	111,602	113,028	224,240	0	3,400,000
60	Loan	49	GSMC	GSMC	AkzoNobel Coatings	0	0	5,178,591	0	5,100,000	78,591	0	0	0	5,178,591
61	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	4238 West Hundred Road	0	0	3,037,000	2,756,198	0	117,284	0	163,518	0	3,037,000
62	Loan	50, 51	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)	0	0	2,233,000	0	0	64,707	103,145	2,065,148	0	2,233,000
63	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Gardens of Victoria	0	132,774	2,906,787	0	2,675,000	121,391	110,396	0	0	2,906,787
64	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Woodview Commons	0	0	1,600,000	1,179,131	0	67,452	10,802	342,615	0	1,600,000

A-30

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control  Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Lockbox	Cash Management	Cash Management Triggers	Ground Lease Y/N	Ground Lease Expiration Date
1	Loan	8, 9, 10, 11, 12	CGMRC	CGMRC	Illinois Center	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.15x
1.01	Property				111 East Wacker				No
1.02	Property				233 North Michigan Avenue				No
2	Loan	8, 13, 14, 15, 16	GSMC	GSMC	Hammons Hotel Portfolio	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Net Operating Income is less than 85% of Closing Date NOI, (iii) failure to deliver financial statements as required in the Loan Agreement, (iv) the occurrence of a Franchise Trigger Event, (v) failure of Sponsor to maintain net worth and liquidity above the respective thresholds
2.01	Property	17			Embassy Suites Concord, NC				Yes	12/9/2059
2.02	Property				Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN				No
2.03	Property				Embassy Suites Norman, OK				No
2.04	Property	15			Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX				No
2.05	Property	15, 18			Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ				Yes	1/29/2063
2.06	Property				Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL				Yes	2/15/2104
2.07	Property	15			Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO				No
3	Loan	19, 20	CGMRC	CGMRC	The Decoration & Design Building	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.10x	Yes	12/31/2023
4	Loan	21	GSMC	GSMC	Hamilton Landing	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.10x, (iii) failure to deliver financial statements as required in the Loan Agreement, (iv) the occurrence of a Rollover Trigger Event, (v) when a natural person is not serving as a guarantor and the replacement sponsor fails to maintain net worth and liquidity above the respective thresholds	No
5	Loan	8, 22, 23	GSMC	GSMC	Courtyard Sunnyvale	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) beginning with the Test Period ending on December 31, 2015 and any Test Period thereafter, DSCR is less than 1.30x and the failure of Borrower to timely make one or more of the cash deposits, (iii) failure to deliver financial statements as required in the Loan Agreement	No
6	Loan	8, 24, 25	RMF	RMF	Somerset Park Apartments	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager	No
7	Loan	8, 26, 27	RMF	RMF	Greylyn Business Park	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default or a Mezzanine Loan Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager, (iii) DSCR is less than 1.15x	No
8	Loan	8, 28	GSMC	GSMC	Pavilion Jenkintown	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.15x and the failure of Borrower to timely make the cash deposit or to deposit a Letter of Credit in accordance with the Loan Agreement, (iii) failure to deliver financial statements as required in the Loan Agreement	No
9	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	University Place	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.20x, (iii) the occurrence of a Specified Tenant Trigger Period	No
10	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.10x, (iii) the occurrence of a Specified Tenant Trigger Period
10.01	Property				Dale Avenue Roanoke				No
10.02	Property				Plantation Road Walmart				No
10.03	Property				Walmart Orange Avenue				No
11	Loan	8, 29	CGMRC	CGMRC	Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.20x
11.01	Property				Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills				No
11.02	Property				Compass Self Storage Novi				No
11.03	Property				Compass Self Storage Madison Heights				No
12	Loan	30	GSMC	GSMC	Mix at Midtown	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.15x, (iii) failure to deliver financial statements as required in the Loan Agreement, (iv) the occurrence of a Critical Tenant Trigger Event	No
13	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Red Dot Storage Portfolio	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.15x
13.01	Property				Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL				No
13.02	Property				Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL				No
13.03	Property				Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL				No
13.04	Property				Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL				No
13.05	Property				Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI				No
13.06	Property				Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL				No
13.07	Property				Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI				No
13.08	Property				Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL				No
13.09	Property				Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL				No
14	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Stadium Plaza	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.15x, (iii) the occurrence of a Specified Tenant Trigger Period	No
15	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Houston Hotel Portfolio	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.20x, (iii) the occurrence of a Franchise Agreement Trigger Period, (iv) the occurrence of a Franchise Renewal Trigger Event, (v) the occurrence of a Manager Bankruptcy Event
15.01	Property				Holiday Inn Express West Road				No
15.02	Property				Hampton Inn Port Arthur				No
16	Loan		RMF	RMF	Courtyard at Cedar Hills	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager	No
17	Loan	31	GSMC	GSMC	Peckham Square	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Net Operating Income is less than 85% of Closing Date NOI, (iii) failure to deliver financial statements as required in the Loan Agreement, (iv) the occurrence of a Rollover Trigger Event and failure to timely deposit one or more Letters of Credit	No
18	Loan	32, 33	CGMRC	CGMRC	Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.15x
18.01	Property	33			Mason Town House				No
18.02	Property	33			Park View Business Center				No
19	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	Dover Marketplace	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.25x, (iii) failure to deliver financial statements as required in the Loan Agreement, (iv) the occurrence of a Critical Tenant Trigger Event	No
20	Loan	34, 35	RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Lanier Crossing Shopping Center	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.10x, (iii) the occurrence of a Specified Tenant Trigger Period	No
21	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Waterway Shoppes II	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager, (iii) DSCR is less than 1.20x	No
22	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Avenue District Apartments	None	None	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Net Operating Income is less than 75% of Closing Date NOI, (iii) failure to deliver financial statements as required in the Loan Agreement	No
23	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	University Retail Portfolio	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.10x, (iii) the occurrence of an Indiana University Trigger Period
23.01	Property				517 Kirkwood Avenue				No
23.02	Property	36			501 East Green Street				No
23.03	Property				1801 West Tennessee Street				No
24	Loan		RMF	RMF	Carrollwood Village Shoppes	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager, (iii) DSCR is less than 1.20x	No
25	Loan		KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Plaza El Toro	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.15x, (iii) Debt Yield is less than 7.0%, (iv) the occurrence of a Specified Tenant Trigger Period	No
26	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Barclay Village	None	None	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.20x, (iii) failure to deliver financial statements as required in the Loan Agreement	No
27	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Plantation	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager, (iii) DSCR is less than 1.20x, (iv) the occurrence of a Seasonality Event	No
28	Loan	37	GSMC	GSMC	Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Net Operating Income is less than $785,000, (iii) failure to deliver financial statements as required in the Loan Agreement, (iv) 12 months prior to the expiration of the Franchise Agreement	No
29	Loan		RMF	RMF	Riverwalk Center	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager, (iii) DSCR is less than 1.15x, (iv) a Critical Tenant Trigger Event	No
30	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Premiere Building	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.20x, (iii) the occurrence of a Specified Tenant Trigger Period	No
31	Loan	8, 38	CGMRC	CGMRC	TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.35x, (iii) the occurrence of a Franchise Agreement Trigger Period, (iv) the occurrence of a Franchise Renewal Trigger Event, (v) the occurrence of Manager taking any Material Action
31.01	Property				Keystone				No
31.02	Property				Park 100				No
32	Loan	8, 39, 40	CGMRC	CGMRC	Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.30x,(iii) the occurrence of a franchise agreement trigger period, (iv) the occurrence of a Franchise Renewal Trigger Event, or (v) any Bankruptcy Event of Manager	No
33	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Anderson Oaks	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.10x, (iii) failure to deliver financial statements as required in the Loan Agreement	No

A-31

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control  Number	Loan / Property Flag	Footnotes	Mortgage Loan Seller	Originator	Property Name	Lockbox	Cash Management	Cash Management Triggers	Ground Lease Y/N	Ground Lease Expiration Date
34	Loan	41	CGMRC	CGMRC	Easy Stop Storage Portfolio	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.15x
34.01	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop				No
34.02	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop				No
34.03	Property				Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial				No
35	Loan	42, 43	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Scott’s Edge Apartments	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.15x, (iii) Debt Yield is less than 7.20%	No
36	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Solomon CVS Portfolio	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.15x, (iii) the occurrence of a Specified Tenant Trigger Period
36.01	Property				CVS Brandon				No
36.02	Property				CVS Paris				No
36.03	Property				CVS Plano				No
37	Loan	8	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Westgate Plaza	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.15x, iii) Debt Yield is less than 7.0%, (iv) the occurrence of a Mark Thomas Ministries Event, (v) the occurrence of a 99 Cents Only Event	No
38	Loan	8, 44	CGMRC	CGMRC	Residence Inn Southern Pines	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.20x, (iii) the occurrence of a Franchise Agreement Trigger Period, (iv) the occurrence of a Franchise Renewal Trigger Event, (v) Bankruptcy action of the Manager	No
39	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Imperial Landing Apartments	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.15x	No
40	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Corporate Place	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.20x, (iii) the occurrence of a Specified Tenant Trigger Period	No
41	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Bricktown Shopping Center	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager, (iii) DSCR is less than 1.10x, (iv) the occurrence of a Critical Tenant Trigger Event	No
42	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt John’s Creek	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager, (iii) DSCR is less than 1.20x	No
43	Loan		RMF	RMF	Hyatt Place Rogers	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager, (iii) DSCR is less than 1.20x or (iv) the occurrence of a Seasonality Event	No
44	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	AR&C Storage	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.15x	No
45	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages	Hard	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager, (iii) DSCR is less than 1.20x, (iv) the occurrence of a Cash Management Franchise Agreement Trigger, (v) the occurrence of a PIP Reserve Trigger	No
46	Loan		RAIT Funding, LLC	RAIT Funding, LLC	Renaissance Faire I	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.10x, (iii) the occurrence of a Specified Tenant Trigger Period	No
47	Loan		RMF	RMF	Cottages at White Oak	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager, (iii) DSCR is less than 1.20x	No
48	Loan	45	GSMC	GSMC	Village Square Shopping Center	None	None	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Net Operating Income is less than 68% of Closing Date NOI, (iii) failure to deliver financial statements as required in the Loan Agreement, (iv) the occurrence of a Rollover Trigger Event	No
49	Loan		RMF	RMF	Northstone Apartments	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager, (iii) DSCR is less than 1.25x	No
50	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Willow Park Apartments	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.25x	No
51	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Cherry Creek	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager, (iii) DSCR is less than 1.25x	No
52	Loan	8	CGMRC	CGMRC	Glenville Target Center	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.20x, (iii) the occurrence of a Specified Tenant Trigger Period	No
53	Loan	8, 46	RMF	RMF	Glades Tower II	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager, (iii) DSCR is less than 1.25x, (iv) the occurrence of a Critical Tenant Trigger Event	No
54	Loan	47	RMF	RMF	Maximum Self Storage	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager, (iii) DSCR is less than 1.20x	No
55	Loan	8, 48	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Sonora Crossroads	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.15x, (iii) Debt Yield is less than 7.5%, (iv) the occurrence of a Specified Tenant Trigger Period	No
56	Loan	8	RMF	RMF	Albertson’s Retail Shops	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager, (iii) DSCR is less than 1.20x, (iv) the occurrence of a Critical Tenant Trigger Event	No
57	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	210 Bedford Avenue	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.10x, (iii) the occurrence of a Specified Tenant Trigger Period	No
58	Loan		RMF	RMF	Capital Clifton Park Self Storage	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) Bankruptcy action of the Borrower, Guarantor or Manager, (iii) DSCR is less than 1.20x	No
59	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Hunters Pointe	None	None	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.10x and the failure of Borrower to timely make the cash deposit or to deposit a Letter of Credit in accordance with the Loan Agreement, (iii) failure to deliver financial statements as required in the Loan Agreement	No
60	Loan	49	GSMC	GSMC	AkzoNobel Coatings	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) the occurrence of a Major Tenant Cash Flow Sweep Period, (iii) the occurrence of a AkzoNobel LOC Trigger Event, (iv) failure to deliver financial statements as required in the Loan Agreement	No
61	Loan		GSMC	GSMC	4238 West Hundred Road	None	None	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) failure to deliver financial statements as required in the Loan Agreement, (iii) the occurrence of a Walgreens Trigger Event	No
62	Loan	50, 51	KGS	KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.15x, (iii) Debt Yield is less than 7.3%, (iv) the occurrence of a Specified Tenant Trigger Period	No
63	Loan		CGMRC	CGMRC	Gardens of Victoria	Springing	Springing	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.20x	No
64	Loan		GSMC	GSCRE	Woodview Commons	None	None	(i) the occurrence of an Event of Default, (ii) DSCR is less than 1.10x and the failure of Borrower to timely make the cash deposit or to deposit a Letter of Credit in accordance with the Loan Agreement, (iii) failure to deliver financial statements as required in the Loan Agreement	No

A-32

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number

Loan / Property Flag

Footnotes

Mortgage Loan Seller

Originator

Property Name

Annual Ground Lease Payment ($)

Cut-off Date B Note Balance ($)

B Note Interest Rate (%)

Cut-off Date Mezzanine Debt Balance ($)

Mezzanine Debt Interest Rate (%)

Terrorism Insurance Required Y/N

Control Number

1

Loan

8, 9, 10, 11, 12

CGMRC

CGMRC

Illinois Center

Yes

1

1.01

Property

111 East Wacker

Yes

1.01

1.02

Property

233 North Michigan Avenue

Yes

1.02

2

Loan

8, 13, 14, 15, 16

GSMC

GSMC

Hammons Hotel Portfolio

Yes

2

2.01

Property

17

Embassy Suites Concord, NC

Yes

2.01

2.02

Property

Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN

Yes

2.02

2.03

Property

Embassy Suites Norman, OK

Yes

2.03

2.04

Property

15

Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX

Yes

2.04

2.05

Property

15, 18

Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ

1,419,741

Yes

2.05

2.06

Property

Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL

224,595

Yes

2.06

2.07

Property

15

Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO

Yes

2.07

3

Loan

19, 20

CGMRC

CGMRC

The Decoration & Design Building

3,825,000

Yes

3

4

Loan

21

GSMC

GSMC

Hamilton Landing

Yes

4

5

Loan

8, 22, 23

GSMC

GSMC

Courtyard Sunnyvale

Yes

5

6

Loan

8, 24, 25

RMF

RMF

Somerset Park Apartments

Yes

6

7

Loan

8, 26, 27

RMF

RMF

Greylyn Business Park

5,375,000

12.0036%

Yes

7

8

Loan

8, 28

GSMC

GSMC

Pavilion Jenkintown

Yes

8

9

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

University Place

Yes

9

10

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio

Yes

10

10.01

Property

Dale Avenue Roanoke

Yes

10.01

10.02

Property

Plantation Road Walmart

Yes

10.02

10.03

Property

Walmart Orange Avenue

Yes

10.03

11

Loan

8, 29

CGMRC

CGMRC

Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio

Yes

11

11.01

Property

Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills

Yes

11.01

11.02

Property

Compass Self Storage Novi

Yes

11.02

11.03

Property

Compass Self Storage Madison Heights

Yes

11.03

12

Loan

30

GSMC

GSMC

Mix at Midtown

Yes

12

13

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Red Dot Storage Portfolio

Yes

13

13.01

Property

Red Dot 6 - Woodstock, IL

Yes

13.01

13.02

Property

Red Dot 7 - Oswego, IL

Yes

13.02

13.03

Property

Red Dot 12 - Peoria, IL

Yes

13.03

13.04

Property

Red Dot 11 - Zion, IL

Yes

13.04

13.05

Property

Red Dot 10 - Genoa City, WI

Yes

13.05

13.06

Property

Red Dot 3 - Yorkville, IL

Yes

13.06

13.07

Property

Red Dot 5 - Janesville, WI

Yes

13.07

13.08

Property

Red Dot 2 - Machesney Park, IL

Yes

13.08

13.09

Property

Red Dot 1 - Rockford, IL

Yes

13.09

14

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Stadium Plaza

Yes

14

15

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Houston Hotel Portfolio

Yes

15

15.01

Property

Holiday Inn Express West Road

Yes

15.01

15.02

Property

Hampton Inn Port Arthur

Yes

15.02

16

Loan

RMF

RMF

Courtyard at Cedar Hills

Yes

16

17

Loan

31

GSMC

GSMC

Peckham Square

Yes

17

18

Loan

32, 33

CGMRC

CGMRC

Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center

Yes

18

18.01

Property

33

Mason Town House

Yes

18.01

18.02

Property

33

Park View Business Center

Yes

18.02

19

Loan

GSMC

GSMC

Dover Marketplace

Yes

19

20

Loan

34, 35

RAIT Funding, LLC

RAIT Funding, LLC

Lanier Crossing Shopping Center

Yes

20

21

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Waterway Shoppes II

Yes

21

22

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Avenue District Apartments

Yes

22

23

Loan

RAIT Funding, LLC

RAIT Funding, LLC

University Retail Portfolio

Yes

23

23.01

Property

517 Kirkwood Avenue

Yes

23.01

23.02

Property

36

501 East Green Street

Yes

23.02

23.03

Property

1801 West Tennessee Street

Yes

23.03

24

Loan

RMF

RMF

Carrollwood Village Shoppes

Yes

24

25

Loan

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Plaza El Toro

Yes

25

26

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Barclay Village

Yes

26

27

Loan

RMF

RMF

Hyatt Plantation

Yes

27

28

Loan

37

GSMC

GSMC

Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar

Yes

28

29

Loan

RMF

RMF

Riverwalk Center

Yes

29

30

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Premiere Building

Yes

30

31

Loan

8, 38

CGMRC

CGMRC

TownePlace Suites Indy Portfolio

Yes

31

31.01

Property

Keystone

Yes

31.01

31.02

Property

Park 100

Yes

31.02

32

Loan

8, 39, 40

CGMRC

CGMRC

Comfort Inn - Newport Kentucky

Yes

32

33

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Anderson Oaks

Yes

33

A-33

CGCMT 2015-GC33 Annex A

Control Number

Loan / Property Flag

Footnotes

Mortgage Loan Seller

Originator

Property Name

Annual Ground Lease Payment ($)

Cut-off Date B Note Balance ($)

B Note Interest Rate (%)

Cut-off Date Mezzanine Debt Balance ($)

Mezzanine Debt Interest Rate (%)

Terrorism Insurance Required Y/N

Control Number

34

Loan

41

CGMRC

CGMRC

Easy Stop Storage Portfolio

Yes

34

34.01

Property

Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop

Yes

34.01

34.02

Property

Easy Stop Storage - Midland Loop

Yes

34.02

34.03

Property

Easy Stop Storage - Midland Industrial

Yes

34.03

35

Loan

42, 43

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Scott’s Edge Apartments

Yes

35

36

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Solomon CVS Portfolio

Yes

36

36.01

Property

CVS Brandon

Yes

36.01

36.02

Property

CVS Paris

Yes

36.02

36.03

Property

CVS Plano

Yes

36.03

37

Loan

8

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Westgate Plaza

Yes

37

38

Loan

8, 44

CGMRC

CGMRC

Residence Inn Southern Pines

Yes

38

39

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Imperial Landing Apartments

Yes

39

40

Loan

8

CGMRC

CGMRC

Corporate Place

Yes

40

41

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Bricktown Shopping Center

Yes

41

42

Loan

RMF

RMF

Hyatt John’s Creek

Yes

42

43

Loan

RMF

RMF

Hyatt Place Rogers

Yes

43

44

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

AR&C Storage

Yes

44

45

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Hampton Inn Suites Lady Lake The Villages

Yes

45

46

Loan

RAIT Funding, LLC

RAIT Funding, LLC

Renaissance Faire I

Yes

46

47

Loan

RMF

RMF

Cottages at White Oak

Yes

47

48

Loan

45

GSMC

GSMC

Village Square Shopping Center

Yes

48

49

Loan

RMF

RMF

Northstone Apartments

Yes

49

50

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Willow Park Apartments

Yes

50

51

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Cherry Creek

Yes

51

52

Loan

8

CGMRC

CGMRC

Glenville Target Center

Yes

52

53

Loan

8, 46

RMF

RMF

Glades Tower II

Yes

53

54

Loan

47

RMF

RMF

Maximum Self Storage

Yes

54

55

Loan

8, 48

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Sonora Crossroads

Yes

55

56

Loan

8

RMF

RMF

Albertson’s Retail Shops

Yes

56

57

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

210 Bedford Avenue

Yes

57

58

Loan

RMF

RMF

Capital Clifton Park Self Storage

Yes

58

59

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Hunters Pointe

Yes

59

60

Loan

49

GSMC

GSMC

AkzoNobel Coatings

Yes

60

61

Loan

GSMC

GSMC

4238 West Hundred Road

Yes

61

62

Loan

50, 51

KGS

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)

Yes

62

63

Loan

CGMRC

CGMRC

Gardens of Victoria

Yes

63

64

Loan

GSMC

GSCRE

Woodview Commons

Yes

64

A-34

	Footnotes to Annex A
(1)	The Administrative Fee Rate includes the Servicing Fee Rate, the Operating Advisor Fee Rate, the Trustee/Certificate Administrator Fee Rate and the CREFC® Intellectual Property Royalty License Fee Rate applicable to each Mortgage Loan.
(2)	The Monthly Debt Service shown for Mortgage Loans with a partial interest-only period reflects the amount payable after the expiration of the interest-only period.
(3)	The open period is inclusive of the Maturity Date.
(4)	Underwritten NCF DSCR is calculated based on amortizing debt service payments (except for interest-only loans).
(5)	Occupancy reflects tenants that have signed leases, but are not yet in occupancy or may not be paying rent.
(6)	The lease expirations shown are based on full lease terms; however, in some instances, the tenant may have the option to terminate its lease prior to the expiration date shown. In addition, in some instances, a tenant may have the right to assign its lease or sublease the leased premises and be released from its obligations under the lease.
(7)	If the purpose of the Mortgage Loan was to finance an acquisition of the Mortgaged Property, the field “Principal’s New Cash Contribution” reflects the cash investment by one or more of the equity owners in the borrower in connection with such acquisition.  If the purpose of the Mortgage Loan was to refinance the Mortgaged Property, the field “Principal’s New Cash Contribution” reflects the cash contributed to the borrower by one or more of the equity owners at the time the Mortgage Loan was originated.
(8)	The Appraised Value presents the “As-Is” Appraised Value of the Mortgaged Property. The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated on the basis of such “As-Is” Appraised Value. The LTV Ratio at Maturity is calculated on the basis of the “As Stabilized” Appraised Value.
(9)	The Cut-off Date Balance of $100,000,000 represents the note A-1 of a $260,000,000 loan combination evidenced by three pari passu notes. The companion loans, evidenced by note A-2 and note A-3, have an aggregate principal balance of $160,000,000 as of the Cut-off Date and are expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization transactions. Cut-off Date LTV Ratio, LTV Ratio at Maturity, Underwritten NCF DSCR, Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Operating Income, Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Cash Flow and Loan Per Unit calculations are based on the aggregate Cut-off Date Balance of $260,000,000.
(10)	The appraiser prepared only one appraisal for both properties secured by the mortgage loan. The “As Is” Appraised Value and “As Stabilized” Appraised Value presented for each property are allocated based upon the percentage of Underwritten Net Cash Flow for that respective property out of the total of Underwritten Net Cash Flow for both properties securing the mortgage loan.
(11)	On the origination date, the borrower deposited $12,500,000 into the TI/LC Reserve. The borrowers are not required to make an ongoing TI/LC Reserve payment unless the TI/LC Reserve account falls below a minimum balance (initially, $7,500,000), after which the borrowers must pay the Ongoing TI/LC Reserve amount (initially $174,324) until the TI/LC Reserve equals or exceeds the TI/LC Reserve cap (initially, $15,000,000).  If the property achieves a debt yield of 10% for two consecutive calendar quarters, the TI/LC Reserve cap will be reduced to $6,000,000 and the minimum balance will be reduced to $2,500,000.  If for two consecutive calendar quarters (i) the property achieves a debt yield of 13% and (ii) the physical occupancy rate for the property equals or exceeds 95%, the TI/LC Reserve cap will be reduced to $2,500,000, the minimum balance will be reduced to $0, and the ongoing TI/LC Reserve amount will be reduced to $87,162.

A-35

(12)	The lockout period will be at least 25 payment dates beginning with and including the First Due Date of September 6, 2015. For the purposes of this Prospectus Supplement, the assumed lockout period of 25 payment dates is based on the expected CGCMT 2015-GC33 securitization closing date in September 2015. The actual lockout period may be longer.
(13)	The Cut-off Date Balance of $100,000,000 represents the controlling A-1 note of a $250,800,000 loan combination evidenced by multiple pari passu notes.  The related companion loans, evidenced by the non-controlling note A-2, note A-3 and note A-4 with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $150,800,000, are expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization transactions. Cut-off Date LTV Ratio, LTV Ratio at Maturity, Underwritten NCF DSCR, Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Operating Income, Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Cash Flow and Loan Per Unit calculations are based on the aggregate Cut-off Date Balance of $250,800,000.
(14)	The lockout period will be at least 24 payment dates beginning with and including the First Due Date of October 6, 2015. For the purposes of this Prospectus Supplement, the assumed lockout period of 24 payment dates is based on the expected CGCMT 2015-GC33 securitization closing date in September 2015. The actual lockout period may be longer.
(15)	The Appraised Value represents the aggregate “As-Is” Appraised Value of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties of $363,750,000 plus a $3,570,502 capital deduction related to franchise mandated capital improvements at the three Marriott Mortgaged Properties for which the borrowers reserved $7,890,000 for the estimated mandatory and additional elective capital improvement costs.  The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio calculated on the basis of the aggregate “As-Is” Appraised Value without adding the capital deduction is 68.9%. The LTV Ratio at Maturity is calculated on the basis of the “As Stabilized” Appraised Value.
(16)	Monthly FF&E Reserve is equal to: (a) on each due date from October 2015 through and including September 2016, $360,433, (b) beginning on the due date in October 2016, the greater of (1) the monthly amount required to be reserved for each Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgaged Property pursuant to the applicable franchise agreement for the replacement of furniture, fixtures and equipment and (2) one-twelfth of 4% of the operating income for each Hammons Hotel Portfolio Mortgaged Property (or, in the case of the Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Mortgaged Property beginning on the due date in October 2017, one-twelfth of 5% of the operating income) for the previous 12-month period (as determined on August 31 of each year).
(17)	Beginning November 21, 2022, Annual Ground Lease Payment shall be 0.25% of adjusted room sales for the previous calendar year (estimated $27,188).
(18)	Annual Ground Lease Payment for the Borrower’s space lease interest in the convention center, expo hall and parking garage is calculated based on the trailing 12 months as of June 30, 2015.  The rent payment is calculated using a fixed component of $985,725 plus a variable component tied to revenue generated from the parking garage and expo hall.
(19)	The Cut-off Date Balance of $65,000,000 represents the note A-2 of a $165,000,000 loan combination evidenced by two pari passu notes. The companion loan has a principal balance of $100,000,000 as of the Cut-off Date and was contributed to the CGCMT 2015-P1 securitization transaction. Cut-off Date LTV Ratio, LTV Ratio at Maturity, Underwritten NCF DSCR, Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Operating Income, Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Cash Flow and Loan Per Unit calculations are based on the aggregate Cut-off Date Balance of $165,000,000.
(20)	The current annual rent due under the ground lease is $3,825,000 through December 2023. The annual ground rent payable under the ground lease for the 25-year renewal term commencing in 2024 will be the greater of (i) 100% of prior year payment, or (ii) 6% of the appraised unencumbered land value as of the date one year prior to the commencement of the renewal term in January 2024. On each due date prior to the maturity date, the borrower is required to pay to the lender one-twelfth of the then annual amount due for ground lease payments.

A-36

(21)	Prior to the occurrence of an acceptable Visual Concepts lease extension or the entering of one or more approved substitute leases for the entirety of the rollover space, the amount contained in the TI/LC Reserve Account shall be no less than $1,000,000.
(22)	Occupancy represents actual results for the 9 month period from November 30, 2014 through July 31, 2015.
(23)	On each due date, the borrower is required to fund the FF&E reserve in an amount equal to (i) $33,788 for the payments dates occurring in October 2015 through September 2016, (ii) for the payment dates occurring in October 2016 through September 2017, the greater of (a) the monthly amount required to be reserved pursuant to the Franchise Agreement for the replacement of FF&E or (b) one-twelfth of 4% of the Operating Income of the Property for the previous twelve month period as determined on the anniversary of the last day of the calendar month in August and (iii) thereafter, the greater of (a) the monthly amount required to be reserved pursuant to the Franchise Agreement for the replacement of FF&E or (b) one-twelfth of 5% of the Operating Income of the Property for the previous twelve month period as determined on the anniversary of the last day of the calendar month in August.
(24)	The Cut-Off Date LTV Ratio is calculated based upon the property’s “As Stabilized” Appraised Value. The “As Stabilized” Appraised Value assumes the completion of $14.6 million of capital improvements as of May 20, 2016. An Upfront Replacement Reserve of $26.5 million is in place. The appraiser concluded to an “as-is” appraised value of $227,500,000. The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Maturity Date LTV Ratio based on the “As-Is” Appraised Value are both 79.1%.
(25)	The Cut-off Date Balance of $36,500,000 represents notes A-1-3 and A-2-3 of a $180,000,000 whole loan evidenced by multiple pari passu notes. Notes A-1-1 and A-2-1, with a Cut-off Date Balance of $73,500,000 were contributed to WFCM 2015-C30. Notes A-1-2 and A-2-2, with a Cut-off Date Balance of $70,000,000  are held outside the issuing entity and are expected to be contributed to a future securitization.  Cut-off Date LTV Ratio, LTV Ratio at Maturity, Underwritten NCF DSCR, Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Operating Income, Debt Yield on Underwritten Net Cash Flow and Loan Per Unit calculations are based on the aggregate cut-off date principal balance of $180,000,000.
(26)	Borrower shall not be required to make Ongoing TI/LC Reserve deposits after the balance in the TI/LC Reserve account exceeds $1,250,000 (the “TI/LC Reserve Cap”) unless (i) the balance in the TI/LC Reserve account is less than $600,000 at any time during 2016, 2018, or 2020, at which time Borrower will resume making Ongoing TI/LC Reserve payments until the balance in the TI/LC Reserve account exceeds the TI/LC Reserve Cap and (ii) at any other time, the balance in the TI/LC Reserve account is less than $250,000, at which time Borrower will resume making Ongoing TI/LC Reserve payments until the balance in the TI/LC Reserve account exceeds $250,000.
(27)	The mortgage loan amortizes based on a non-standard amortization schedule and the Underwritten NCF DSCR is calculated based on the aggregate Debt Service for the 12-month period immediately succeeding the expiration of the interest only period.  See Annex G in the Prospectus Supplement for the related amortization schedule.
(28)	For tenants with multiple lease expirations, the expiration date associated with the largest square footage is shown.
(29)	The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated net of the $800,000 economic holdback reserve.  The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio calculated based upon the fully funded Mortgage Loan amount of $21,000,000 and “as-is” Appraised Value of $28,200,000 is 74.5%.
(30)	Certain tenants (including the Largest Tenant, 24 Hour Fitness) pay rent directly into the hard lockbox and the remaining tenants pay rent into a soft springing lockbox.
(31)	Ongoing RE Tax Reserve shown will be collected monthly beginning with the due date in October 2015.

A-37

(32)	Loan Per Unit is calculated based upon the total SF of the retail property securing the mortgage loan and the multifamily property securing the mortgage loan.
(33)	Occupancy is calculated on the loan level by dividing the total occupied SF of the multifamily and retail space at the mortgaged properties by the total SF of the multifamily and office space. at the mortgaged properties. Occupancy at the property level is calculated based upon units for the multifamily property securing the mortgage loan and is calculated based upon SF for the retail property securing the mortgage loan.
(34)	The borrower is required to fund an Ongoing Replacement Reserve in the amount of $1,375 on each monthly Due Date until such time that the reserve balance equals or exceeds $82,502. In the event the reserve is less than $16,500 and/or an event of default exists, the borrower’s obligation to make monthly deposits recommences until the reserve balance equals or exceeds $82,502 or such event of default is cured.
(35)	The borrower is required to fund an Ongoing Tenant Rollover Reserve in the amount of $2,962.16 on each monthly payment date occurring on and after December 2015 and such funds will be held in a lender-controlled account and will be released to the borrower upon lender’s receipt of (i) a lease amendment and/or extension of tenant Simply Southard Bakery’s lease or (ii) a replacement lease for the premises governed by such Simply Southard Bakery lease, each of which are subject to certain economic conditions approved by lender in accordance with the loan agreement.
(36)	The Third Largest Tenant, Chase, operates an ATM at the property.
(37)	On each Due Date, the borrower is required to fund the FF&E reserve in an amount equal to the greater of (a) the monthly amount required to be reserved pursuant to the Franchise Agreement for the replacement of FF&E or (b) one-twelfth of 4% of the Operating Income of the Mortgaged Property for the previous twelve month period as determined on the anniversary of the last day of the calendar month of August.
(38)	The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated using the appraisal’s “As-Is” Appraised Value of $13,400,000 plus the amount of PIP required the franchise agreement ($894,188). The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio calculated using solely the “As-Is” Appraised Value is 67.2%.
(39)	Ongoing FF&E Reserve payments are waived for the first 12 monthly payments. Commencing on the 13th monthly payment, the borrower is required to deposit into the FF&E Reserve an amount equal to the greater of (i) one-twelfth of 4% of gross income from operations for the preceding calendar year, (ii) one-twelfth of 4% of gross income from operations for the succeeding calendar year in the budget.
(40)	The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated using the appraisal’s “As-Is” Appraised Value of $14,700,000 plus the amount of PIP required the franchise agreement ($900,792). The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio calculated using solely the “As-Is” Appraised Value is 56.5%.
(41)	The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated net of the $200,000 economic holdback reserve.  The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio calculated based upon the fully funded Mortgage Loan amount of $8,200,000 and “As-Is” Appraised Value of $11,990,000 is 68.4%.
(42)	Limited historical financial information is available as the mortgaged property underwent a gut renovation in 2014 from an industrial building into a multifamily property.
(43)	An affiliate of the Borrower made an unsecured loan to the Borrower on December 10, 2013, evidenced by a non-negotiable, unsecured promissory note in the amount of approximately $1.76 Million. There are no regularly scheduled payments on the unsecured note. Lender obtained a Subordination and Standstill Agreement at closing. Pursuant to the Subordination and Standstill Agreement, the unsecured note is fully subordinated to the Loan. In the event of a Trigger Period under the Loan, no payments are

A-38

	permitted on the unsecured note. Also, the lender under the unsecured note relinquished any rights to require any payments under the note until the Loan is paid in full.
(44)	The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated using the appraisal’s “As-Is” Appraised Value of $11,000,000 plus the amount of PIP required the franchise agreement ($356,034). The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio calculated using solely the “As-Is” Appraised Value is 66.7%.
(45)	Ongoing Other Reserves of $7,916.67 will be collected on each Due Date beginning in August 2015 through July 2016.
(46)	Starting with the September 2016 payment, the Monthly TI/LC Reserve decreases to $1,677.17 through the Maturity Date.
(47)	The total square footage of 87,301 square feet includes 85,780 square feet of storage space (796 units) and 1,521 square feet of office space (9 units).
(48)	Ongoing TI/LC Reserve payments are required during the first 12 monthly payment dates in an amount equal to the difference between amortizing payments due under the loan and the interest only payments required under the loan documents for the first 12 monthly payments. Commencing on the 13th monthly payment date, approximately $1,417 is required to be deposited into the TI/LC Reserve account on each monthly payment date.
(49)	The sole tenant, AkzoNobel Coatings, Inc, is paying rent and expected to take occupancy in September 2015.  We cannot assure you the tenant will take occupancy as expected or at all.
(50)	At origination, $33,000 was reserved related to rent concessions for the EXP Elite Performance. Amounts in the reserve account will be released to borrower as monthly debt service payments are made, in increments not to exceed $2,750, until the reserve funds have been exhausted.
(51)	Deposits into the TI/LC Reserve account are waived for the first 9 monthly payments. Commencing on June 6, 2016, borrower is required to deposit $598 on each monthly Due Date into the TI/LC Reserve account.

A-39

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

ANNEX B

STRUCTURAL AND COLLATERAL TERM SHEET

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

September 14, 2015

Structural and Collateral Term Sheet

$958,489,233 

(Approximate Mortgage Pool Balance) 

$879,413,000

(Offered Certificates) 

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33 

As Issuing Entity

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. 

As Depositor

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 

Series 2015-GC33 

Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. 

Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company  

Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC 

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC 

RAIT Funding, LLC 

As Sponsors

Citigroup	Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Co-Lead Managers and Joint Bookrunners
Drexel Hamilton
Co-Manager

B-1

CERTIFICATE SUMMARY

OFFERED CERTIFICATES
Offered Class	Initial Certificate Principal Amount or Notional Amount(1)	Approximate Initial Credit Support	Initial Pass- Through Rate(2)	Pass-Through Rate Description	Expected Wtd. Avg. Life (Yrs)(3)	Expected Principal Window(3)
Class A-1	$31,785,000	30.000%(4)	1.643%	Fixed	2.83	10/15 – 8/20
Class A-2	$15,217,000	30.000%(4)	2.946%	Fixed	4.86	8/20 – 8/20
Class A-3	$220,000,000	30.000%(4)	3.515%	Fixed	9.83	7/25 – 8/25
Class A-4	$331,456,000	30.000%(4)	3.778%	Fixed	9.87	8/25 – 9/25
Class A-AB	$72,484,000	30.000%(4)	3.522%	Fixed	7.44	8/20 – 7/25
Class X-A	$718,866,000(5)	N/A	0.989%	Variable IO(6)	N/A	N/A
Class A-S(7)	$47,924,000(8)	25.000%	4.114%	Fixed	9.95	9/25 – 9/25
Class B(7)	$62,302,000(8)	18.500%	4.571%	WAC(9)	9.95	9/25 – 9/25
Class PEZ(7)	$152,160,000(8)	14.125%(10)	(11)	(11)	9.95	9/25 – 9/25
Class C(7)	$41,934,000(8)	14.125%(10)	4.571%	WAC(9)	9.95	9/25 – 9/25
Class D	$56,311,000	8.250%	3.172%	Fixed	9.95	9/25 – 9/25
Class X-D	$56,311,000(5)	N/A	1.399%	Variable IO(6)	N/A	N/A
NON-OFFERED CERTIFICATES
Non-Offered Class	Initial Certificate Principal Amount(1)	Approximate Initial Credit Support	Initial Pass- Through Rate(2)	Pass-Through Rate Description	Expected Wtd. Avg. Life (Yrs)(3)	Expected Principal Window(3)
Class E	$23,963,000	5.750%	4.571%	WAC(9)	10.07	9/25 – 5/26
Class F	$9,584,000	4.750%	4.571%	WAC(9)	10.61	5/26 – 5/26
Class G	$11,129,000	3.589%	4.571%	WAC(9)	10.61	5/26 – 5/26
Class H	$34,400,233	0.000%	4.571%	WAC(9)	10.61	5/26 – 5/26
Class R(12)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

The securities offered by this structural and collateral term sheet (this “Term Sheet”) are described in greater detail in the prospectus, dated January 16, 2015, included as part of our registration statement (SEC File No. 333-189017) (the “Base Prospectus”) and a separate prospectus supplement dated September 14, 2015 (the “Prospectus Supplement”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Term Sheet have the respective meanings assigned to those terms elsewhere in the Prospectus Supplement or, if not defined in the Prospectus Supplement, then in the Base Prospectus.

(1) Approximate, subject to a variance of plus or minus 5%.

(2) Approximate per annum rate as of the Closing Date.

(3) Determined assuming no prepayments prior to the maturity date for each mortgage loan and based on the Modeling Assumptions set forth under “Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations” in the Prospectus Supplement.

(4) The credit support percentages set forth for the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates are represented in the aggregate.

(5) The Class X-A and Class X-D certificates (collectively, the “Class X Certificates”) will not have certificate principal amounts and will not be entitled to receive distributions of principal. Interest will accrue on the Class X-A and Class X-D certificates at their respective pass-through rates based upon their respective notional amounts. The notional amount of the Class X-A certificates will be equal to the aggregate of the certificate principal amounts of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates and the Class A-S trust component from time to time. The notional amount of the Class X-D certificates will be equal to the certificate principal amount of the Class D certificates from time to time.

(6) The pass-through rate on the Class X-A certificates will generally be a per annum rate equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the weighted average of the net interest rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months), over (ii) the weighted average of the pass-through rates on the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates and the Class A-S trust component, as described in the Prospectus Supplement. The pass-through rate on the Class X-D certificates will generally be a per annum rate equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the weighted average of the net interest rates on the mortgage loans (in each case adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months), over (ii) the pass-through rate on the Class D certificates, as described in the Prospectus Supplement.

(7) The Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates, in the applicable proportions, may be exchanged for Class PEZ certificates, and Class PEZ certificates may be exchanged for the applicable proportions of Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates. The Class A-S, Class B, Class PEZ and Class C certificates are collectively referred to as the “Exchangeable Certificates”.

B-2

CERTIFICATE SUMMARY (continued)

(8) On the Closing Date, the issuing entity will issue the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components, which will have initial outstanding principal balances, subject to a variance of plus or minus 5%, of $47,924,000, $62,302,000 and $41,934,000, respectively. The Exchangeable Certificates will, at all times, represent undivided beneficial ownership interests in a grantor trust that will hold such trust components. Each class of the Exchangeable Certificates will, at all times, represent a beneficial interest in a percentage of the outstanding principal balance of the Class A-S, Class B and/or Class C trust components. Following any exchange of Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates for Class PEZ certificates or any exchange of Class PEZ certificates for Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates, the percentage interest of the outstanding principal balances of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components that is represented by the Class A-S, Class B, Class PEZ and Class C certificates will be increased or decreased accordingly. The initial certificate principal amount of each class of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates shown in the table above represents the maximum certificate principal amount of such class without giving effect to any issuance of Class PEZ certificates. The initial certificate principal amount of the Class PEZ certificates shown in the table above is equal to the aggregate of the maximum initial certificate principal amounts of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates, representing the maximum certificate principal amount of the Class PEZ certificates that could be issued in an exchange. The actual certificate principal amount of any class of Exchangeable Certificates issued on the Closing Date may be less than the maximum certificate principal amount of that class and may be zero. The certificate principal amounts of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates to be issued on the Closing Date will be reduced, in required proportions, by an amount equal to the certificate principal amount of the Class PEZ certificates issued on the Closing Date. The aggregate certificate principal amount of the offered certificates shown on the cover page of this Term Sheet includes the maximum certificate principal amount of Exchangeable Certificates that could be outstanding on the Closing Date, equal to $152,160,000 (subject to a variance of plus or minus 5%).

(9) For any distribution date, the pass-through rate on each class of the Class B, Class C, Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates will be equal to the weighted average of the net interest rates on the mortgage loans (in each case, adjusted, if necessary, to accrue on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months) as of their respective due dates in the month preceding the month in which the related distribution date occurs.

(10) The initial subordination levels for the Class C and Class PEZ certificates are equal to the subordination level of the underlying Class C trust component.

(11) The Class PEZ certificates will not have a pass-through rate, but will be entitled to receive the sum of the interest distributable on the percentage interests of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components represented by the Class PEZ certificates. The pass-through rates on the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components will at all times be the same as the pass-through rates on the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates, respectively.

(12) The Class R certificates will not have a certificate principal amount, notional amount, pass-through rate, rating or rated final distribution date. The Class R certificates will represent the residual interests in each of two separate REMICs, as further described in the Prospectus Supplement. The Class R certificates will not be entitled to distributions of principal or interest.

B-3

MORTGAGE POOL CHARACTERISTICS

Mortgage Pool Characteristics(1)
Initial Pool Balance(2)	$958,489,233
Number of Mortgage Loans	64
Number of Mortgaged Properties	92
Average Cut-off Date Mortgage Loan Balance	$14,976,394
Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate	4.5900%
Weighted Average Remaining Term to Maturity (months)	119
Weighted Average Remaining Amortization Term (months)(3)	359
Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(4)	66.6%
Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV Ratio(5)	57.4%
Weighted Average Underwritten Debt Service Coverage Ratio(6)	1.66x
Weighted Average Debt Yield on Underwritten NOI(7)	10.6%
% of Mortgage Loans with Subordinate Debt	4.6%
% of Mortgaged Properties with Single Tenants	5.2%

(1) The Illinois Center, Hammons Hotel Portfolio, The Decoration & Design Building and Somerset Park Apartments mortgage loans have one or more related pari passu companion loans, and the loan-to-value ratio, debt service coverage ratio, debt yield and balance per room/SF/unit calculations presented in this Term Sheet include the related pari passu companion loans unless otherwise indicated. Other than as specifically noted, the loan-to-value ratio, debt service coverage ratio, debt yield and mortgage loan rate information for each mortgage loan is presented in this Term Sheet without regard to any other indebtedness (whether or not secured by the related mortgaged property, ownership interests in the related borrower or otherwise) that currently exists or that may be incurred by the related borrower or its owners in the future, in order to present statistics for the related mortgage loan without combination with the other indebtedness.

(2) Subject to a permitted variance of plus or minus 5%.

(3) Excludes mortgage loans that are interest only for the entire term.

(4) Unless otherwise indicated, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated utilizing the “as-is” appraised value. With respect to 7 mortgage loans, representing approximately 19.9% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, the respective Cut-off Date LTV Ratio was calculated using either (i) an “as-is” appraised value plus related capital improvement or property improvement plan costs which were reserved for at origination, (ii) the cut-off date principal balance of a mortgage loan less a reserve taken at origination or (iii) the “as stabilized” appraised value which assumes the completion of capital improvements which were reserved for at origination. The weighted average Cut-off Date LTV Ratio for the mortgage pool without making any of the adjustments described above is 67.1%. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in the Prospectus Supplement for a description of the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio.

(5) Unless otherwise indicated, the Maturity Date LTV Ratio is calculated utilizing the “as-is” appraised value. With respect to 20 mortgage loans, representing approximately 47.1% of the initial pool balance, the respective Maturity Date LTV Ratios were each calculated using the related “as stabilized” or “prospective value upon stabilization” appraised value. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in the Prospectus Supplement for a description of Maturity Date LTV Ratio.

(6) Unless otherwise indicated, the Underwritten Debt Service Coverage Ratio for each mortgage loan is calculated by dividing the Underwritten Net Cash Flow from the related mortgaged property or mortgaged properties by the annual debt service for such mortgage loan, as adjusted in the case of mortgage loans with a partial interest only period by using the first 12 amortizing payments due instead of the actual interest only payment. With respect to the Greylyn Business Park mortgage loan, representing approximately 3.7% of the initial pool balance, which amortizes based on the non-standard amortization schedule set forth on Annex G to the Prospectus Supplement, the Underwritten Debt Service Coverage Ratio is calculated based on the aggregate debt service for the 12-month period commencing August 6, 2017. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in the Prospectus Supplement for a description of Underwritten Debt Service Coverage Ratio.

(7) Unless otherwise indicated, the Debt Yield on Underwritten NOI for each mortgage loan is the related mortgaged property’s Underwritten NOI divided by the Cut-off Date Balance of such mortgage loan, and the Debt Yield on Underwritten NCF for each mortgage loan is the related mortgaged property’s Underwritten NCF divided by the Cut-off Date Balance of such mortgage loan. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in the Prospectus Supplement for descriptions of Debt Yield on Underwritten NOI and Debt Yield on Underwritten NCF.

B-4

KEY FEATURES OF THE CERTIFICATES

Co-Lead Managers and Joint Bookrunners:	Citigroup Global Markets Inc.  Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Co-Manager:	Drexel Hamilton, LLC
Depositor:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.
Initial Pool Balance:	$958,489,233
Master Servicer:	Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Special Servicer:	LNR Partners, LLC
Certificate Administrator:	Citibank, N.A.
Trustee:	Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
Operating Advisor:	Situs Holdings, LLC
Pricing:	Week of September 14, 2015
Closing Date:	September 29, 2015
Cut-off Date:	For each mortgage loan, the related due date for such mortgage loan in September 2015 (or, in the case of any mortgage loan that has its first due date in October 2015, the date that would have been its due date in September 2015 under the terms of that mortgage loan if a monthly payment were scheduled to be due in that month)
Determination Date:	The 6th day of each month or, if such 6th day is not a business day, the next business day, commencing in October 2015
Distribution Date:	The 4th business day after the Determination Date, commencing in October 2015
Interest Accrual:	The preceding calendar month
ERISA Eligible:	The offered certificates are expected to be ERISA eligible, subject to the exemption conditions described in the Prospectus Supplement
SMMEA Eligible:	No
Payment Structure:	Sequential Pay
Day Count:	30/360
Tax Structure:	REMIC
Rated Final Distribution Date:	September 2058
Cleanup Call:	1.0%
Minimum Denominations:	$10,000 minimum for the offered certificates (except with respect to Class X-A and Class X-D: $1,000,000 minimum); $1 thereafter for all the offered certificates
Delivery:	Book-entry through DTC
Bond Information:	Cash flows are expected to be modeled by TREPP, INTEX and BLOOMBERG

B-5

TRANSACTION HIGHLIGHTS

■ $958,489,233 (Approximate) New-Issue Multi-Borrower CMBS:

— Overview: The mortgage pool consists of 64 fixed-rate commercial mortgage loans that have an aggregate Cut-off Date Balance of $958,489,233 (the “Initial Pool Balance”), have an average mortgage loan Cut-off Date Balance of $14,976,394 and are secured by 92 mortgaged properties located throughout 26 states

— LTV: 66.6% weighted average Cut-off Date LTV Ratio

— DSCR: 1.66x weighted average Underwritten Debt Service Coverage Ratio

— Debt Yield: 10.6% weighted average Debt Yield on Underwritten NOI

— Credit Support: 30.000% credit support to Class A-1 / A-2 / A-3 / A-4 / A-AB

■ Loan Structural Features:

— Amortization: 86.6% of the mortgage loans by Initial Pool Balance have scheduled amortization:

– 28.4% of the mortgage loans by Initial Pool Balance have amortization for the entire term with a balloon payment due at maturity

– 58.2% of the mortgage loans by Initial Pool Balance have scheduled amortization following a partial interest only period with a balloon payment due at maturity

— Hard Lockboxes: 54.8% of the mortgage loans by Initial Pool Balance have a Hard Lockbox in place

— Cash Traps: 94.2% of the mortgage loans by Initial Pool Balance have cash traps triggered by certain declines in cash flow, all at levels equal to or greater than a 1.00x coverage, that fund an excess cash flow reserve

— Reserves: The mortgage loans require amounts to be escrowed for reserves as follows:

– Real Estate Taxes: 60 mortgage loans representing 95.8% of the Initial Pool Balance

– Insurance: 47 mortgage loans representing 45.6% of the Initial Pool Balance

– Replacement Reserves (Including FF&E Reserves): 59 mortgage loans representing 92.5% of the Initial Pool Balance

– Tenant Improvements / Leasing Commissions: 30 mortgage loans representing 82.2% of the portion of the Initial Pool Balance that is secured by office, retail, mixed use and industrial properties and one self storage property with office tenants

— Predominantly Defeasance: 90.1% of the mortgage loans by Initial Pool Balance permit defeasance after an initial lockout period

■ Multiple-Asset Types > 5.0% of the Initial Pool Balance:

— Office: 26.5% of the mortgaged properties by allocated Initial Pool Balance are office properties

— Hospitality: 22.8% of the mortgaged properties by allocated Initial Pool Balance are hospitality properties

— Retail: 22.5% of the mortgaged properties by allocated Initial Pool Balance are retail properties (17.4% are anchored or shadow anchored retail properties)

— Multifamily: 13.1% of the mortgaged properties by allocated Initial Pool Balance are multifamily properties

— Self Storage: 6.2% of the mortgaged properties by allocated Initial Pool Balance are self storage properties

■ Geographic Diversity: The 92 mortgaged properties are located throughout 26 states with only two states having greater than 10.0% of the allocated Initial Pool Balance: Illinois (16.8%) and California (14.0%)

B-6

COLLATERAL OVERVIEW

Mortgage Loans by Loan Seller
Mortgage Loan Seller	Mortgage Loans	Mortgaged Properties	Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.	22	42	$384,033,596	40.1%
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company	16	22	329,702,422	34.4
Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC	18	18	184,808,907	19.3
KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC	5	5	32,105,560	3.3
RAIT Funding, LLC	3	5	27,838,749	2.9
Total	64	92	$958,489,233	100.0%

Ten Largest Mortgage Loans
#	Mortgage Loan Name	Mortgage Loan Seller	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance	Property Type	Property Size Rooms / SF / Units	Cut-off Date Balance Per Room / SF / Unit	UW NCF DSCR	UW NOI Debt Yield	Cut-off Date LTV Ratio
1	Illinois Center	CGMRC	$100,000,000	10.4%	Office	2,091,889	$124	1.35x	9.1%	66.7%
2	Hammons Hotel Portfolio	GSMC	100,000,000	10.4	Hospitality	1,869	$134,189	1.68x	12.4%	68.3%
3	The Decoration & Design Building	CGMRC	65,000,000	6.8	Office	588,512	$280	2.30x	13.8%	41.3%
4	Hamilton Landing	GSMC	60,000,000	6.3	Office	406,355	$148	2.42x	11.4%	70.8%
5	Courtyard Sunnyvale	GSMC	40,600,000	4.2	Hospitality	145	$280,000	1.77x	12.0%	70.0%
6	Somerset Park Apartments	RMF	36,500,000	3.8	Multifamily	2,226	$80,863	1.77x	8.4%	72.1%
7	Greylyn Business Park	RMF	35,625,000	3.7	Industrial	648,314	$55	1.57x	10.4%	74.4%
8	Pavilion Jenkintown	GSMC	31,230,786	3.3	Mixed Use	359,826	$87	1.63x	10.7%	66.3%
9	University Place	CGMRC	28,000,000	2.9	Retail	250,159	$112	1.52x	10.2%	74.3%
10	Virginia Walmart Portfolio	CGMRC	26,046,472	2.7	Retail	124,073	$210	1.14x	7.1%	72.8%
	Top 10 Total / Wtd. Avg.		$523,002,258	54.6%				1.75x	10.9%	66.2%
	Remaining Total / Wtd. Avg.		435,486,975	45.4				1.57x	10.2%	67.2%
	Total / Wtd. Avg.		$958,489,233	100.0%				1.66x	10.6%	66.6%

Pari Passu Companion Loan Summary
Mortgage Loan Name	Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance	Number of Companion Loans	Pari Passu Companion Loan Cut-off Date Balance	Loan Combination Cut-off Date Balance	Controlling Pooling & Servicing Agreement (“Controlling PSA”)(1)	Master Servicer	Special Servicer
Illinois Center	$100,000,000	10.4%	2	$160,000,000	$260,000,000	CGCMT 2015-GC33	Wells Fargo	LNR
Hammons Hotel Portfolio	$100,000,000	10.4%	3	$150,800,000	$250,800,000	CGCMT 2015-GC33	Wells Fargo	LNR
The Decoration & Design Building	$65,000,000	6.8%	1	$100,000,000	$165,000,000	CGCMT 2015-P1	Wells Fargo	LNR
Somerset Park Apartments	$36,500,000	3.8%	4	$143,500,000	$180,000,000	WFCM 2015-C30	Wells Fargo	CWCapital

(1) Each loan combination will be serviced under the related Controlling PSA, and the controlling class representative under the related Controlling PSA (or such other party as is designated under the related Controlling PSA) will be entitled to exercise the rights of controlling note holder for the subject loan combination.

B-7

COLLATERAL OVERVIEW (continued)
Mortgage Loans with Existing Subordinate Debt
Mortgage Loan Name	Mortgage Loan Cut-off Date Balance	Mezzanine / Subordinate Debt Cut-off Date Balance	Cut-off Date Total Debt Balance	Wtd. Avg. Cut-off Date Total Debt Interest Rate	Cut-off Date Mortgage Loan LTV	Cut-off Date Total Debt LTV	Cut-off Date Mortgage Loan UW NCF DSCR	Cut-off Date Total Debt UW NCF DSCR
Greylyn Business Park(1)(2)	$35,625,000	$5,375,000	$41,000,000	5.7800%	74.4%	85.6%	1.57x	1.18x
Scott’s Edge Apartments(3)	$8,150,000	$1,763,100	$9,913,100	—	72.8%	—	1.33x	—

(1) The related mezzanine loan is currently being held by RMezz Greylyn BP, LLC, an affiliate of Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC.

(2) The Greylyn Business Park Cut-off Date Mortgage Loan UW NCF DSCR and Cut-off Date Total Debt UW NCF DSCR are calculated using the mortgage loan’s non-standard amortization schedule (as set forth on Annex G to the Prospectus Supplement) and the related mezzanine loan’s non-standard amortization schedule, as applicable, and are calculated based on the aggregate debt service for the 12-month period commencing August 6, 2017.

(3) The borrower received an unsecured loan from two of its affiliates in December 2014 in the original principal amount of approximately $1,763,100. Pursuant to a subordination and standstill agreement between the lenders of the unsecured loan and the lender, the unsecured loan is subordinated to the Scott’s Edge Apartments mortgage loan and, during certain trigger periods under the Scott’s Edge Apartment mortgage loan documents (caused by an event of default, the debt service coverage ratio falling below 1.15x or the debt yield falling below 7.20%), payments on the unsecured loan are not permitted.

B-8

COLLATERAL OVERVIEW (continued)
Previously Securitized Mortgaged Properties(1)
Property Name	Mortgage Loan Seller	City	State	Property Type	Cut-off Date Balance / Allocated Cut-off Date Balance(2)	% of Initial Pool Balance	Previous Securitization
111 East Wacker	CGMRC	Chicago	IL	Office	$56,439,703	5.9%	WBCMT 2006-C27
233 North Michigan Avenue	CGMRC	Chicago	IL	Office	$43,560,297	4.5%	COMM 2001-J2A
The Decoration & Design Building	CGMRC	New York	NY	Office	$65,000,000	6.8%	COMM 2006-C7
Somerset Park Apartments	RMF	Troy	MI	Multifamily	$36,500,000	3.8%	WFCM 2015-C30
Pavilion Jenkintown	GSMC	Jenkintown	PA	Mixed Use	$31,230,786	3.3%	GSMS 2006-GG6
Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills	CGMRC	Rochester Hills	MI	Self Storage	$7,500,000	0.8%	WFRBS 2011-C2
Compass Self Storage Novi	CGMRC	Novi	MI	Self Storage	$7,500,000	0.8%	WFRBS 2011-C2
Compass Self Storage Madison Heights	CGMRC	Madison Heights	MI	Self Storage	$6,000,000	0.6%	WFRBS 2011-C2
Peckham Square	GSMC	Reno	NV	Retail	$12,450,000	1.3%	CSFB 2005-C5
Dover Marketplace	GSMC	Dover	PA	Retail	$11,250,000	1.2%	GECMC 2005-C3
Lanier Crossing Shopping Center	RAIT	Cumming	GA	Retail	$11,200,000	1.2%	LBUBS 2001-C2, CSFB 2005-C6
501 East Green Street	RAIT	Champaign	IL	Retail	$2,803,794	0.3%	MSC 2007-IQ14
Plaza El Toro	KGS	Lake Forest	CA	Retail	$10,000,000	1.0%	MLCFC 2006-4
Barclay Village	GSMC	Oregon City	OR	Multifamily	$9,800,000	1.0%	CD 2007-CD4
Premiere Building	CGMRC	Hallandale Beach	FL	Office	$9,000,000	0.9%	CSFB 2005-C6
Westgate Plaza	KGS	Riverside	CA	Retail	$7,700,000	0.8%	MLCFC 2006-4
Corporate Place	CGMRC	Beachwood	OH	Office	$7,012,500	0.7%	LBUBS 2007-C2
Village Square Shopping Center	GSMC	Lexington	SC	Retail	$5,600,000	0.6%	GCCFC 2005-GG5
Northstone Apartments	RMF	Raleigh	NC	Multifamily	$5,500,000	0.6%	BSCMS 2005-PWR9
Sonora Crossroads	KGS	Sonora	CA	Retail	$4,025,000	0.4%	CD 2005-CD1
Albertson’s Retail Shops	RMF	Pueblo	CO	Retail	$4,000,000	0.4%	GCCFC 2005-GG5
Hunters Pointe	GSMC	Medina	OH	Multifamily	$3,392,210	0.4%	MLCFC 2006-1
4238 West Hundred Road	GSMC	Chester	VA	Retail	$3,033,168	0.3%	WBCMT 2005-C21
Ventura Blvd (Woodland Hills)	KGS	Woodland Hills	CA	Retail	$2,230,560	0.2%	CSFB 2005-C3
Woodview Commons	GSMC	Streetsboro	OH	Multifamily	$1,600,000	0.2%	CSMC 2006-C1

(1) The table above includes mortgaged properties securing mortgage loans for which the most recent prior financing of all or a significant portion of such mortgaged property was included in a securitization. Information under “Previous Securitization” represents the most recent such securitization with respect to each of those mortgaged properties. The information in the above table is based solely on information provided by the related borrower or obtained through searches of a third-party database, and has not otherwise been confirmed by the mortgage loan sellers.

(2) Reflects the allocated loan amount in cases where the applicable mortgaged property is one of a portfolio of mortgaged properties securing a particular mortgage loan.

B-9

  COLLATERAL OVERVIEW (continued)

     Property Types 

Property Type / Detail	Number of Mortgaged Properties	Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance(1)	% of Initial Pool Balance(1)	Wtd. Avg. Underwritten NCF DSCR(2)	Wtd. Avg. Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(2)	Wtd. Avg.  Debt Yield on Underwritten NOI(2)
Office	8	$254,412,500	26.5%	1.91x	61.0%	11.1%
CBD	3	165,000,000	17.2	1.72x	56.7%	11.0%
General Suburban	4	85,112,500	8.9	2.28x	69.2%	11.4%
Medical	1	4,300,000	0.4	1.48x	61.4%	10.5%
Hospitality	19	$218,211,299	22.8%	1.79x	66.3%	12.8%
Full Service	5	82,912,775	8.7	1.68x	68.3%	12.4%
Select Service	4	63,920,000	6.7	1.80x	68.1%	12.6%
Limited Service	6	50,393,344	5.3	1.88x	61.6%	13.4%
Extended Stay	4	20,985,180	2.2	2.00x	64.7%	14.0%
Retail	27	$215,701,636	22.5%	1.41x	70.2%	9.3%
Anchored	10	128,182,942	13.4	1.47x	70.4%	9.7%
Unanchored	7	37,519,920	3.9	1.41x	71.6%	9.5%
Single Tenant Retail	7	37,079,640	3.9	1.22x	70.4%	7.8%
Shadow Anchored	3	12,919,134	1.3	1.41x	63.4%	9.5%
Multifamily	14	$125,411,482	13.1%	1.59x	68.7%	8.9%
Garden	12	106,486,482	11.1	1.62x	68.7%	8.9%
Mid-Rise	1	10,600,000	1.1	1.49x	63.3%	9.0%
Student Housing	1	8,325,000	0.9	1.35x	75.0%	9.0%
Self Storage	18	$59,750,884	6.2%	1.39x	70.7%	8.7%
Mixed Use	4	$46,180,175	4.8%	1.52x	66.2%	10.2%
Office/Retail/Self Storage	1	31,230,786	3.3	1.63x	66.3%	10.7%
Flex	1	6,292,749	0.7	1.37x	69.2%	10.6%
Office/Retail	1	4,906,640	0.5	1.28x	70.1%	8.3%
Retail/Multifamily	1	3,750,000	0.4	1.15x	55.1%	7.3%
Industrial	2	$38,821,257	4.1%	1.59x	73.2%	10.5%
Total / Wtd. Avg.	92	$958,489,233	100.0%	1.66x	66.6%	10.6%

(1) Calculated based on the mortgaged property’s allocated loan amount for mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property.

(2) Weighted average based on the mortgaged property’s allocated loan amount for mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property.

B-10

COLLATERAL OVERVIEW (continued)

Geographic Distribution 

Property Location	Number of Mortgaged Properties	Aggregate Cut-off Date Balance(1)	% of Initial Pool Balance	Aggregate Appraised Value(2)	% of Total Appraised Value	Underwritten NOI(2)	% of Total Underwritten NOI
Illinois	14	$160,703,794	16.8%	$472,610,000	20.1%	$29,286,370	18.2%
California	7	133,805,560	14.0	199,540,000	8.5	15,176,589	9.5
New York	4	77,320,018	8.1	419,480,000	17.9	23,881,889	14.9
Texas	12	76,079,346	7.9	136,719,314	5.8	9,953,555	6.2
North Carolina	4	73,390,541	7.7	157,800,000	6.7	13,459,668	8.4
Florida	8	62,190,566	6.5	94,760,000	4.0	7,011,042	4.4
Michigan	4	57,500,000	6.0	255,700,000	10.9	16,856,718	10.5
Pennsylvania	2	42,480,786	4.4	62,100,000	2.6	4,386,550	2.7
Virginia	5	37,229,640	3.9	51,950,000	2.2	2,812,881	1.8
Ohio	5	25,800,967	2.7	38,310,000	1.6	2,613,652	1.6
Georgia	3	23,788,023	2.5	35,200,000	1.5	2,475,917	1.5
Oregon	2	22,800,000	2.4	36,800,000	1.6	2,047,933	1.3
Oklahoma	2	21,074,641	2.2	63,100,000	2.7	5,098,491	3.2
Tennessee	1	20,235,247	2.1	72,500,000	3.1	6,453,957	4.0
Missouri	2	20,126,823	2.1	36,826,188	1.6	2,768,068	1.7
Nevada	2	16,725,000	1.7	22,600,000	1.0	1,749,691	1.1
Indiana	3	13,906,640	1.5	20,400,000	0.9	1,915,366	1.2
New Jersey	2	13,600,000	1.4	22,350,000	1.0	1,255,685	0.8
Arizona	1	11,974,976	1.2	55,200,000	2.4	3,830,620	2.4
Alabama	1	10,103,668	1.1	36,200,000	1.5	3,072,698	1.9
Wisconsin	3	9,292,749	1.0	13,100,000	0.6	936,566	0.6
Kentucky	1	8,300,000	0.9	14,700,000	0.6	1,279,740	0.8
Arkansas	1	6,890,000	0.7	10,300,000	0.4	923,194	0.6
South Carolina	1	5,600,000	0.6	7,480,000	0.3	544,651	0.3
Colorado	1	4,000,000	0.4	6,130,000	0.3	371,543	0.2
Mississippi	1	3,570,248	0.4	5,400,000	0.2	338,493	0.2
Total	92	$958,489,233	100.0%	$2,347,255,502	100.0%	$160,501,527	100.0%

(1) Calculated based on the mortgaged property’s allocated loan amount for mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property.

(2) Aggregate Appraised Values and Underwritten NOI reflect the aggregate values without any reduction for the pari passu companion loan(s).

 

B-11

Distribution of Cut-off Date Balances
Range of Cut-off Date Balances ($)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
1,600,000 - 4,999,999	13	$44,378,463	4.6	%
5,000,000 - 9,999,999	26	193,304,571	20.2
10,000,000 - 14,999,999	11	125,821,000	13.1
15,000,000 - 19,999,999	3	50,982,942	5.3
20,000,000 - 29,999,999	3	75,046,472	7.8
30,000,000 - 34,999,999	1	31,230,786	3.3
35,000,000 - 39,999,999	2	72,125,000	7.5
40,000,000 - 100,000,000	5	365,600,000	38.1
Total	64	$958,489,233	100.0	%
Distribution of Underwritten DSCRs(1)
Range of UW DSCR (x)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
1.14 - 1.29	3	$40,142,472	4.2	%
1.30 - 1.49	32	361,850,941	37.8
1.50 - 1.69	10	232,769,514	24.3
1.70 - 1.89	12	156,226,306	16.3
1.90 - 2.09	2	16,200,000	1.7
2.10 - 2.29	1	9,000,000	0.9
2.30 - 2.66	4	142,300,000	14.8
Total	64	$958,489,233	100.0	%

(1) See footnotes (1) and (6) to the table entitled “Mortgage Pool Characteristics” above.

Distribution of Amortization Types(1)
Amortization Type	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
Amortizing (25 Years)	1	$8,000,000	0.8	%
Amortizing (30 Years)	20	264,228,011	27.6
Interest Only, Then Amortizing(2)	38	557,961,222	58.2
Interest Only	5	128,300,000	13.4
Total	64	$958,489,233	100.0	%

(1) All of the mortgage loans will have balloon payments at maturity date.

(2) Original partial interest only periods range from 12 to 69 months.

Distribution of Lockboxes
Lockbox Type	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
Hard	17	$525,281,740	54.8	%
Springing	41	399,182,115	41.6
None	6	34,025,378	3.5
Total	64	$958,489,233	100.0	%

Distribution of Cut-off Date LTV Ratios(1)
Range of Cut-off Date LTV (%)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
41.3 - 49.9	1	$65,000,000	6.8	%
50.0 - 54.9	4	27,230,560	2.8
55.0 - 59.9	5	35,300,000	3.7
60.0 - 64.9	15	105,219,858	11.0
65.0 - 69.9	12	310,951,558	32.4
70.0 - 75.0	27	414,787,258	43.3
Total	64	$958,489,233	100.0	%

(1) See footnotes (1) and (4) to the table entitled “Mortgage Pool Characteristics” above.

Distribution of Maturity Date LTV Ratios(1)
Range of Maturity Date LTV (%)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
37.5 - 39.9	1	$65,000,000	6.8	%
40.0 - 44.9	1	2,230,560	0.2
45.0 - 49.9	10	66,773,559	7.0
50.0 - 54.9	12	214,625,786	22.4
55.0 - 59.9	16	209,160,455	21.8
60.0 - 64.9	16	225,698,874	23.5
65.0 - 69.9	6	78,500,000	8.2
70.0 - 72.1	2	96,500,000	10.1
Total	64	$958,489,233	100.0	%

(1) See footnotes (1) and (5) to the table entitled “Mortgage Pool Characteristics” above.

Distribution of Loan Purpose
Loan Purpose	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
Refinance	45	$604,426,194	63.1	%
Acquisition	18	351,832,479	36.7
Recapitalization	1	2,230,560	0.2
Total	64	$958,489,233	100.0	%
Distribution of Mortgage Interest Rates
Range of Mortgage Interest Rates (%)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
4.110 - 4.249	3	$80,483,168	8.4	%
4.250 - 4.499	16	317,974,920	33.2
4.500 - 4.749	27	304,006,487	31.7
4.750 - 4.999	14	230,861,635	24.1
5.000 - 5.249	3	20,863,023	2.2
5.250 - 5.360	1	4,300,000	0.4
Total	64	$958,489,233	100.0	%

B-12

Distribution of Debt Yield on Underwritten NOI(1)
Range of Debt Yields on Underwritten NOI (%)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
7.1 - 7.9	2	$29,796,472	3.1	%
8.0 - 8.9	10	133,634,023	13.9
9.0 - 9.9	24	285,103,337	29.7
10.0 - 10.9	10	133,079,095	13.9
11.0 - 11.9	4	77,652,507	8.1
12.0 - 12.9	5	164,203,799	17.1
13.0 - 13.9	6	111,320,000	11.6
14.0 - 14.9	1	6,400,000	0.7
15.0 - 15.9	2	17,300,000	1.8
Total	64	$958,489,233	100.0	%

(1) See footnotes (1) and (7) to the table entitled “Mortgage Pool Characteristics” above.

Distribution of Debt Yield on Underwritten NCF(1)
Range of Debt Yields on Underwritten NCF (%)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
7.0 - 7.9	2	$29,796,472	3.1	%
8.0 - 8.9	29	385,246,057	40.2
9.0 - 9.9	15	176,789,839	18.4
10.0 - 10.9	7	183,695,567	19.2
11.0 - 11.9	6	84,781,299	8.8
12.0 - 13.9	4	89,180,000	9.3
14.0	1	9,000,000	0.9
Total	64	$958,489,233	100.0	%

(1) See footnotes (1) and (7) to the table entitled “Mortgage Pool Characteristics” above.

Mortgage Loans with Original Partial Interest Only Periods
Original Partial Interest Only Period (months)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
12	3	$18,725,000	2.0	%
24	12	$119,343,750	12.5	%
36	10	$114,196,472	11.9	%
48	2	$15,700,000	1.6	%
60	10	$224,996,000	23.5	%
69	1	$65,000,000	6.8	%
Distribution of Original Terms to Maturity
Original Term to Maturity (months)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
60	2	$15,641,299	1.6	%
120	61	877,847,935	91.6
129	1	65,000,000	6.8
Total	64	$958,489,233	100.0	%
Distribution of Remaining Terms to Maturity
Range of Remaining Terms to Maturity (months)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
59	2	$15,641,299	1.6	%
118-120	61	877,847,935	91.6
128	1	65,000,000	6.8
Total	64	$958,489,233	100.0	%

Distribution of Original Amortization Terms(1)
Original Amortization Terms (months)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
Interest Only	5	$128,300,000	13.4	%
300	2	14,400,000	1.5
360	57	815,789,233	85.1
Total	64	$958,489,233	100.0	%

(1) All of the mortgage loans will have balloon payments at maturity.

Distribution of Remaining Amortization Terms(1)
Range of Remaining Amortization Terms (months)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
Interest Only	5	$128,300,000	13.4	%
300	2	14,400,000	1.5
358 - 360	57	815,789,233	85.1
Total	64	$958,489,233	100.0	%

(1) All of the mortgage loans will have balloon payments at maturity.

Distribution of Prepayment Provisions
Prepayment Provision	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
Defeasance	53	$863,586,780	90.1	%
Yield Maintenance	9	63,419,512	6.6
Yield Maintenance or Defeasance	2	31,482,942	3.3
Total	64	$958,489,233	100.0	%
Distribution of Escrow Types
Escrow Type	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance
Real Estate Tax	60	$918,213,336	95.8	%
Replacement Reserves(1)	59	$886,682,549	92.5	%
TI/LC(2)	30	$466,090,555	82.2	%
Insurance	47	$436,940,867	45.6	%

(1) Includes mortgage loans with FF&E reserves.

(2) Percentage of total office, retail, mixed use and industrial properties and one self storage property with office tenants only.

B-13

SHORT TERM CERTIFICATE PRINCIPAL PAY DOWN SCHEDULE

Class A-2 Principal Pay Down⁽¹⁾

Mortgage Loan Name	Property Type	Cut-off Date Balance	% of Initial Pool Balance	Remaining Loan Term	Underwritten NCF DSCR	Debt Yield on Underwritten NOI	Cut-off Date LTV Ratio
Comfort Inn – Newport Kentucky	Hospitality	$8,300,000	0.9%	59	2.33x	15.4%	53.2%
Residence Inn Southern Pines	Hospitality	$7,341,299	0.8%	59	1.85x	12.6%	64.6%

(1) The table above presents the mortgage loan whose balloon payment would be applied to pay down the aggregate principal balance of the Class A-2 certificates assuming a 0% CPR and applying the modeling assumptions described under “Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations” in the Prospectus Supplement, including the assumptions that (i) none of the mortgage loans in the pool experience prepayments prior to the maturity date, as applicable, defaults or losses; (ii) there are no extensions of maturity dates of any mortgage loans in the pool; and (iii) each mortgage loan in the pool is paid in full on its stated maturity date. Each class of certificates, including the Class A-2 certificates evidences undivided ownership interests in the entire pool of mortgage loans. Debt service coverage ratio, debt yield and loan-to-value ratio information does not take into account subordinate debt (whether or not secured by the mortgaged property), if any, that is allowed under the terms of any mortgage loan. See Annex A to the Prospectus Supplement. See the footnotes to the table entitled “Mortgage Pool Characteristics” above.

B-14

STRUCTURAL OVERVIEW

Distributions On each distribution date, funds available for distribution from the mortgage loans, net of specified expenses of the issuing entity and net of yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums, will be distributed in the following amounts and order of priority (in each case to the extent of remaining available funds): 1.   Class A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4, A-AB and X-A certificates: To interest on the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class X-A certificates, up to, and pro rata in accordance with, their respective interest entitlements.  2.   Class A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4 and A-AB certificates: to the extent of funds allocable to principal received or advanced on the mortgage loans, (i) to principal on the Class A-AB certificates until their certificate principal amount is reduced to the Class A-AB scheduled principal balance set forth in Annex F to the Prospectus Supplement for the relevant Distribution Date, then (ii) to principal on the Class A-1 certificates until their certificate principal amount is reduced to zero, all funds available for distribution of principal remaining after the distributions to Class A-AB in clause (i) above, then (iii) to principal on the Class A-2 certificates until their certificate principal amount is reduced to zero, all funds available for distribution of principal remaining after the distributions to Class A-1 in clause (ii) above, then (iv) to principal on the Class A-3 certificates until their certificate principal amount is reduced to zero, all funds available for distribution of principal remaining after the distributions to Class A-2 in clause (iii) above, then (v) to principal on the Class A-4 certificates until their certificate principal amount is reduced to zero, all funds available for distribution of principal remaining after the distributions to Class A-3 in clause (iv) above, and then (vi) to principal on the Class A-AB certificates until their certificate principal amount is reduced to zero, all funds available for distribution of principal remaining after the distributions to Class A-4 in clause (v) above. However, if the certificate principal amounts of each and every class of certificates other than the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates have been reduced to zero as a result of the allocation of mortgage loan losses and other unanticipated expenses to those certificates, then funds available for distributions of principal will be distributed to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates, pro rata, based on their respective certificate principal amounts (and the schedule for the Class A-AB principal distributions will be disregarded). 3.   Class A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4 and A-AB certificates: To reimburse Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates, pro rata, for any unreimbursed losses on the mortgage loans that were previously allocated to reduce the certificate principal amounts of those classes, together with interest at their respective pass-through rates. 4.   Class A-S and Class PEZ certificates: (i) first, to interest on Class A-S and Class PEZ certificates in the amount of the interest entitlement with respect to the Class A-S trust component, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S trust component; (ii) next, to the extent of funds allocated to principal remaining after distributions in respect of principal to each class with a higher priority (in this case, the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates), to principal on Class A-S and Class PEZ certificates, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S trust component, until the certificate principal amount of the Class A-S trust component is reduced to zero; and (iii) next, to reimburse Class A-S and Class PEZ certificates for any unreimbursed losses on the mortgage loans that were previously allocated to reduce the certificate principal amount of the Class A-S trust component, together with interest at the pass-through rate for such trust component, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S trust component. 5.   Class B and Class PEZ certificates: (i) first, to interest on Class B and Class PEZ certificates in the amount of the interest entitlement with respect to the Class B trust component, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class B trust component; (ii) next, to the extent of funds allocated to principal remaining after distributions in respect of principal to each class and trust component with a higher priority (in this case, the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates and the Class A-S trust component), to principal on Class B and Class PEZ certificates, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class B trust component, until the certificate principal amount of the Class B trust component is reduced to zero; and (iii) next, to reimburse Class B and Class PEZ certificates for any unreimbursed losses on the mortgage loans that were previously allocated to reduce the certificate principal amount of the Class B trust component, together with interest at the pass-through rate for such trust component, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class B trust component. 

B-15

STRUCTURAL OVERVIEW (continued)

Distributions (continued)

6.   Class C and Class PEZ certificates: (i) first, to interest on Class C and Class PEZ certificates in the amount of the interest entitlement with respect to the Class C trust component, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class C trust component; (ii) next, to the extent of funds allocated to principal remaining after distributions in respect of principal to each class and trust component with a higher priority (in this case, the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates and the Class A-S and Class B trust components), to principal on Class C and Class PEZ certificates, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class C trust component, until the certificate principal amount of the Class C trust component is reduced to zero; and (iii) next, to reimburse Class C and Class PEZ certificates for any unreimbursed losses on the mortgage loans that were previously allocated to reduce the certificate principal amount of the Class C trust component, together with interest at the pass-through rate for such trust component, pro rata in proportion to their respective percentage interests in the Class C trust component. 7.   Class D and Class X-D certificates: (i) first, to interest on Class D and Class X-D certificates in the amount of, and pro rata in accordance with, their respective interest entitlements; (ii) next, to the extent of funds allocated to principal remaining after distributions in respect of principal to each class and trust component with a higher priority (in this case, the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates and the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components), to principal on Class D certificates until their certificate principal amount is reduced to zero; and (iii) next, to reimburse Class D certificates for any unreimbursed losses on the mortgage loans that were previously allocated to reduce the certificate principal amount of that class, together with interest at its pass-through rate. 8.   Class E certificates: (i) first, to interest on Class E certificates in the amount of their interest entitlement; (ii) next, to the extent of funds allocated to principal remaining after distributions in respect of principal to each class of certificates and each trust component with a higher priority (in this case, the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class D certificates and the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components), to principal on Class E certificates until their certificate principal amount is reduced to zero; and (iii) next, to reimburse Class E certificates for any unreimbursed losses on the mortgage loans that were previously allocated to reduce the certificate principal amount of that class, together with interest at its pass-through rate. 9.   After Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB, Class X-A, Class A-S, Class B, Class PEZ, Class C, Class D, Class X-D and Class E certificates are paid all amounts to which they are entitled, the remaining funds available for distribution will be used to pay interest and principal and to reimburse any unreimbursed losses to the Class F, Class G and Class H certificates sequentially in that order in a manner analogous to the Class E certificates, until the certificate principal amount of each such class is reduced to zero.

Realized Losses

The certificate principal amounts of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB, Class D, Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates and the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components (and thus, the Exchangeable Certificates) will each be reduced without distribution on any Distribution Date as a write-off to the extent of any loss realized on the mortgage loans allocated to such class or trust component on such Distribution Date. On each Distribution Date, any such write-offs will be applied to such classes of certificates and trust components in the following order, in each case until the related certificate principal amount is reduced to zero: first, to the Class H certificates; second, to the Class G certificates; third, to the Class F certificates; fourth, to the Class E certificates; fifth, to the Class D certificates; sixth, to the Class C trust component (and correspondingly to the Class C and Class PEZ certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class C trust component); seventh, to the Class B trust component (and correspondingly to the Class B and Class PEZ certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class B trust component); eighth, to the Class A-S trust component (and correspondingly to the Class A-S and Class PEZ certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S trust component); and, finally pro rata, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates, based on their then current respective certificate principal amounts. The notional amount of the Class X-A certificates will be reduced to reflect reductions in the certificate principal amounts of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates and the Class A-S trust component resulting from allocations of losses realized on the mortgage loans. The notional amount of the Class X-D certificates will be reduced to reflect reductions in the certificate principal amount of the Class D certificates resulting from allocations of losses realized on the mortgage loans.

B-16

STRUCTURAL OVERVIEW (continued)

Prepayment Premiums and Yield Maintenance Charges

On each Distribution Date, each yield maintenance charge collected on the mortgage loans during the applicable one-month period ending on the related Determination Date is required to be distributed as follows: (1) first such yield maintenance charge will be allocated between (x) the group (the “YM Group A”) of Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4 and Class A-AB certificates and the Class A-S trust component (and correspondingly to the Class A-S and Class PEZ certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S trust component), and (y) the group (the “YM Group B” and together with the YM Group A, the “YM Groups”), of the the Class B trust component (and correspondingly to the Class B and Class PEZ certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class B trust component), the Class C trust component (and correspondingly to the Class C and Class PEZ certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class C trust component) and the Class D certificates, pro rata, based upon the aggregate amount of principal distributed to the classes of certificates (other than the Exchangeable Certificates) and trust components (and, therefore, the applicable classes of Exchangeable Certificates) in each YM Group on such Distribution Date, and (2) then (A) the portion of such yield maintenance charge allocated to each YM Group will be further allocated as among the classes of certificates and trust components in such YM Group in the following manner: each class of certificates (other than the Exchangeable Certificates) and trust components in such YM Group will entitle the applicable certificateholders to receive on the applicable Distribution Date that portion of such yield maintenance charge equal to the product of (x) a fraction whose numerator is the amount of principal distributed to such class of certificates or trust component on such Distribution Date and whose denominator is the total amount of principal distributed to all of the certificates (other than the Exchangeable Certificates) and trust components in that YM Group on such Distribution Date, (y) the Base Interest Fraction for the related principal prepayment and such class of certificates or trust component, and (z) the amount of such yield maintenance charge allocated to such YM Group and (B) the amount of such yield maintenance charge allocated to each YM Group and remaining after such distributions will be distributed to the holders of the Class X-A certificates. If there is more than one class of certificates (other than the Exchangeable Certificates) and/or trust component (and thus the applicable classes of Exchangeable Certificates) in either YM Group entitled to distributions of principal on any particular Distribution Date on which yield maintenance charges are distributable, the aggregate amount of such yield maintenance charges will be allocated among all such classes of certificates (other than the Exchangeable Certificates) and/or trust components (and, therefore, the applicable classes of Exchangeable Certificates) up to, and on a pro rata basis in accordance with, their respective entitlements in those yield maintenance charges in accordance with the first sentence of this paragraph.  The “Base Interest Fraction” with respect to any principal prepayment on any mortgage loan and with respect to any class of Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class D certificates or any trust component is a fraction (a) whose numerator is the amount, if any, by which (i) the pass-through rate on such class of certificates or trust component exceeds (ii) the discount rate used in accordance with the related loan documents in calculating the yield maintenance charge with respect to such principal prepayment and (b) whose denominator is the amount, if any, by which (i) the mortgage loan rate on such mortgage loan exceeds (ii) the discount rate used in accordance with the related loan documents in calculating the yield maintenance charge with respect to such principal prepayment; provided, however, that under no circumstances shall the Base Interest Fraction be greater than one. However, if such discount rate is greater than or equal to both of (x) the mortgage loan rate on the prepaid mortgage loan and (y) the pass-through rate described in the preceding sentence, then the Base Interest Fraction will equal zero, and if such discount rate is greater than or equal to the mortgage loan rate described in the preceding sentence, but less than the pass-through rate, the fraction will be one. If a prepayment premium is imposed in connection with a prepayment rather than a yield maintenance charge, then the prepayment premium so collected will be allocated as described above. For this purpose, the discount rate used to calculate the Base Interest Fraction will be the discount rate used to determine the yield maintenance charge for mortgage loans that require payment at the greater of a yield maintenance charge or a minimum amount equal to a fixed percentage of the principal balance of the mortgage loan or, for mortgage loans that only have a prepayment premium based on a fixed percentage of the principal balance of the mortgage loan, such other discount rate as may be specified in the related loan documents. No prepayment premiums or yield maintenance charges will be distributed to holders of the Class X-D, Class E, Class F, Class G, Class H or Class R certificates. Instead, after the notional amount of the Class X-A certificates and the certificate principal amounts of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class D certificates and the trust components have been reduced to zero, all prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges with respect to the mortgage loans will be distributed to holders of the Class X-A certificates. For a description of prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges required on the mortgage loans, see Annex A to the Prospectus Supplement. See also “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Default Interest and Limitations on Prepayments” in the Base Prospectus. Prepayment premiums and yield maintenance charges will be distributed on any Distribution Date only to the extent they are received in respect of the mortgage loans as of the related Determination Date.

B-17

STRUCTURAL OVERVIEW (continued)

Advances	The master servicer and, if it fails to do so, the trustee, will be obligated to make P&I advances with respect to each mortgage loan in the issuing entity and, with respect to all of the serviced loans, servicing advances, including paying delinquent property taxes, condominium assessments, insurance premiums and ground lease rents, but only to the extent that those advances are not deemed non-recoverable from collections on the related mortgage loan and, in the case of P&I advances, subject to reduction in connection with any appraisal reductions that may occur. The special servicer will have no obligation to make any property protection advances, provided that, in an urgent or emergency situation requiring the making of a property protection advance, the special servicer may make a property protection advance and will be entitled to reimbursement from the master servicer for such advance.
Serviced Mortgage Loans / Outside Serviced Mortgage Loans	Each of (i) The Decoration & Design Building loan combination and (ii) the Somerset Park Apartments loan combination constitutes an “outside serviced loan combination,” each related mortgage loan constitutes an “outside serviced mortgage loan” and each related companion loan constitutes an “outside serviced companion loan.” Each outside serviced mortgage loan will be serviced under a pooling and servicing agreement other than the CGCMT 2015-GC33 pooling and servicing agreement (such other pooling and servicing agreement, an “outside servicing agreement”) as reflected in the “Pari Passu Companion Loan Summary” table above. All of the mortgage loans transferred to the issuing entity (other than any outside serviced mortgage loan) are sometimes referred to in this Term Sheet as the “serviced mortgage loans” or the “serviced loans” (which signifies that they are being serviced by the master servicer and the special servicer under the CGCMT 2015-GC33 pooling and servicing agreement). See “—Loan Combinations” below.
Appraisal Reduction Amounts	An appraisal reduction amount generally will be created with respect to a required appraisal loan (which is a serviced loan as to which certain defaults, modifications or insolvency events have occurred (as further described in the Prospectus Supplement)) in the amount, if any, by which the principal balance of such required appraisal loan, plus other amounts overdue or advanced in connection with such required appraisal loan, exceeds 90% of the appraised value of the related mortgaged property plus certain escrows and reserves (including letters of credit) held with respect to such required appraisal loan. In general, any appraisal reduction amount calculated with respect to a loan combination will be allocated first, to any related subordinate companion loan (up to the outstanding principal balance thereof), and then, to the related mortgage loan and any related pari passu companion loan(s) on a pro rata basis in accordance with their respective outstanding principal balances. In the case of an outside serviced mortgage loan, any appraisal reduction amounts will be calculated pursuant to, and by a party to, the related outside servicing agreement (as discussed under “—Loan Combinations” below). As a result of an appraisal reduction amount being calculated for and/or allocated to a given mortgage loan, the interest portion of any P&I advance for such mortgage loan will be reduced, which will have the effect of reducing the amount of interest available for distribution to the most subordinate class(es) of certificates (exclusive of the Exchangeable Certificates and Class R certificates) and/or trust components then outstanding (i.e., first to the Class H certificates, then to the Class G certificates, then to the Class F certificates, then to the Class E certificates, then pro rata based on interest entitlements, to the Class D and Class X-D certificates, then to the Class C trust component (and correspondingly, to the Class C certificates and the Class PEZ certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class C trust component), then to the Class B trust component (and correspondingly, to the Class B certificates and the Class PEZ certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class B trust component), then to the Class A-S trust component (and correspondingly, to the Class A-S certificates and the Class PEZ certificates, pro rata based on their respective percentage interests in the Class A-S trust component), and then, pro rata based on interest entitlements, to the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class X-A certificates). In general, a serviced loan will cease to be a required appraisal loan, and no longer be subject to an appraisal reduction amount, when the same has ceased to be a specially serviced loan (if applicable), has been brought current for at least three consecutive months and no other circumstances exist that would cause such serviced loan to be a required appraisal loan. At any time an Appraisal is ordered with respect to a property that would result in appraisal reduction amount with respect to a serviced loan that would result in a change in the controlling class, certain certificateholders will have a right to request a new appraisal as described in the Prospectus Supplement.
Age of Appraisals	Appraisals (which can be an update of a prior appraisal) with respect to a serviced loan are required to be no older than 9 months for purposes of determining appraisal reductions (other than the annual re-appraisal), market value, and other calculations as described in the Prospectus Supplement.
Sale of Defaulted Loans	There will be no “Fair Market Value Purchase Option”. Instead defaulted mortgage loans will be sold in a process similar to the sale process for REO property. With respect to an outside serviced loan combination, the party acting as special servicer with respect to such outside serviced loan combination (as discussed under “—Loan Combinations” below) pursuant to the related outside servicing agreement (the “outside special servicer”) may offer to sell to any person (or may offer to purchase) for cash such outside serviced loan combination in accordance with the terms of the related outside servicing agreement during such time as such outside serviced loan combination constitutes a sufficiently defaulted mortgage loan thereunder and, in connection with any such sale, the related outside special servicer is required to sell both the applicable outside serviced mortgage loan and the related outside serviced companion loan(s) as one loan combination.

B-18

STRUCTURAL OVERVIEW (continued)

Cleanup Call	On any distribution date on which the aggregate unpaid principal balance of the mortgage loans remaining in the issuing entity is less than 1% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the Cut-off Date (excluding for purposes of this calculation, The Decoration & Design Building mortgage loan, which as of the closing date, has a stated maturity date beyond the tenth anniversary of the closing date), certain specified persons will have the option to purchase all of the remaining mortgage loans (and all property acquired through exercise of remedies in respect of any mortgage loan) at the price specified in the Prospectus Supplement. Exercise of the option will terminate the issuing entity and retire the then outstanding certificates. If the aggregate certificate principal amounts of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class D certificates and the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components and the notional amounts of the Class X-A and Class X-D certificates have been reduced to zero and if the master servicer has received from the remaining certificateholders the payment specified in the CGCMT 2015-GC33 pooling and servicing agreement, the issuing entity could also be terminated in connection with an exchange of all the then-outstanding certificates (excluding the Class R certificates), for the mortgage loans remaining in the issuing entity, but all of the holders of those classes of outstanding certificates would have to voluntarily participate in the exchange
Directing Holder	The “Directing Holder” with respect to any mortgage loan serviced under the CGCMT 2015-GC33 pooling and servicing agreement will be the Controlling Class Representative.
Controlling Class Representative	The “Controlling Class Representative” will be the controlling class certificateholder or other representative designated by at least a majority of the controlling class certificateholders (by certificate principal amount). The “controlling class” is the most subordinate class of the Control Eligible Certificates that has an outstanding certificate principal amount as notionally reduced by any appraisal reduction amounts allocated to such class, that is equal to or greater than 25% of the initial certificate principal amount of that class of certificates, or if no such class meets the preceding requirement, then the Class E certificates will be the controlling class; provided, however, that (at any time that the aggregate certificate principal amount of the Class A-1, Class A-2, Class A-3, Class A-4, Class A-AB and Class D certificates and the Class A-S, Class B and Class C trust components has been reduced to zero without regard to the allocation of appraisal reduction amounts) (A) in the case of any class of Control Eligible Certificates to which the designation of “controlling class” would otherwise shift by operation of this definition, where the certificate principal amount of such class of Control Eligible Certificates has been reduced to zero (without regard to the allocation of appraisal reduction amounts) prior to such shift, then designation of “controlling class” shall not shift and shall remain with the class of Control Eligible Certificates currently designated as the controlling class, and (B) in the case of any class of Control Eligible Certificates which is then designated the “controlling class”, if the certificate principal amount of such class of Control Eligible Certificates is reduced to zero (without regard to the allocation of appraisal reduction amounts), then the designation of “controlling class” shall shift to the class of Control Eligible Certificates that is the most subordinate and that also has a remaining certificate principal amount. The “Control Eligible Certificates” consist of the Class E, Class F, Class G and Class H certificates. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Directing Holder” in the Prospectus Supplement. No other class of certificates will be eligible to act as the controlling class or appoint a Controlling Class Representative. No person may exercise any of the rights and powers of the Controlling Class Representative with respect to an excluded mortgage loan. It is anticipated that LNR Securities Holdings, LLC (an affiliate of LNR Partners, LLC), or an affiliate thereof, will purchase a majority of the controlling class of certificates and is expected to appoint LNR Securities Holdings, LLC, or an affiliate thereof, to be the initial Controlling Class Representative.
Control Termination Event	A “Control Termination Event” will occur when no class of the Control Eligible Certificates has an outstanding certificate principal amount as notionally reduced by any appraisal reduction amounts allocated to such class, that is equal to or greater than 25% of the initial certificate principal amount of that class of certificates; provided, however, that a Control Termination Event will in no event exist at any time that the aggregate certificate principal amount of each class of certificates (other than the Control Eligible Certificates) (without regard to the allocation of appraisal reduction amounts) has been reduced to zero.
Consultation Termination Event	A “Consultation Termination Event” will occur when no class of Control Eligible Certificates has an outstanding certificate principal amount, without regard to the allocation of any appraisal reduction amounts, that is equal to or greater than 25% of the initial certificate principal amount of that class of certificates; provided, however, that a Consultation Termination Event will in no event exist at any time that the aggregate certificate principal amount of each class of certificates (other than the Control Eligible Certificates) (without regard to the allocation of appraisal reduction amounts) has been reduced to zero.

B-19

STRUCTURAL OVERVIEW (continued)
Control/Consultation Rights	So long as a Control Termination Event does not exist, the Controlling Class Representative will be entitled to have consent and/or consultation rights under the CGCMT 2015-GC33 pooling and servicing agreement with respect to certain major decisions (including with respect to assumptions, waivers, loan modifications and workouts) and other matters with respect to each serviced mortgage loan, except with respect to any serviced mortgage loan as to which the Controlling Class Representative or a holder of more than 50% of the controlling class of certificates (by certificate principal amount) is a borrower, mortgagor or manager of a related mortgaged property or an affiliate of any of the foregoing (any such mortgage loan, an “excluded mortgage loan”). After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the consent rights of the Controlling Class Representative will terminate, and the Controlling Class Representative will retain consultation rights under the CGCMT 2015-GC33 pooling and servicing agreement with respect to certain major decisions and other matters with respect to the serviced mortgage loans other than an excluded mortgage loan. After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, all of these rights of the Controlling Class Representative with respect to the serviced mortgage loans will terminate. If at any time that the current holder of the Controlling Class (or its designee) or one of its affiliates, or any successor Controlling Class Representative or Controlling Class Certificateholder(s) is no longer the certificateholder (or beneficial owner) of at least a majority of the Controlling Class by certificate principal amount and the certificate administrator has neither (i) received notice of the then-current holders (or, in the case of book-entry certificates, beneficial owners) of at least a majority of the Controlling Class by certificate principal amount nor (ii) received notice of a replacement Controlling Class Representative pursuant to the CGCMT 2015-GC33 pooling and servicing agreement, then a Control Termination Event and a Consultation Termination Event will be deemed to have occurred and will be deemed to continue until such time as the certificate administrator receives either such notice. With respect to an outside serviced loan combination, the Controlling Class Representative (prior to the occurrence of a Consultation Termination Event) will have limited consultation rights, and the applicable outside controlling class representative pursuant to, and subject to the limitations set forth in, the related outside servicing agreement will have consultation, approval and direction rights, with respect to certain major decisions (including with respect to assumptions, waivers, loan modifications and workouts) regarding such outside serviced loan combination, as provided for in the related co-lender agreement and in the related outside servicing agreement, and as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” in the Prospectus Supplement.
Loan Combinations	The Illinois Center mortgage loan (evidenced by note A-1), which represents the controlling interest in the Illinois Center loan combination, will be contributed to the issuing entity, has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $100,000,000 and represents approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance. The related companion loans (evidenced by notes A-2 and A-3), represent non-controlling interests in the Illinois Center loan combination and are currently held by Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. outside the issuing entity. The Illinois Center companion loans have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $160,000,000 and are expected to be contributed to one or more future commercial mortgage securitization transactions. The Illinois Center mortgage loan and the related companion loans will be serviced pursuant to the CGCMT 2015-GC33 pooling and servicing agreement. The Hammons Hotel Portfolio mortgage loan (evidenced by note A-1), which represents the controlling interest in the Hammons Hotel Portfolio loan combination, will be contributed to the issuing entity, has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $100,000,000 and represents approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance. The related companion loans (evidenced by notes A-2, A-3 and A-4), represent non-controlling interests in the Hammons Hotel Portfolio loan combination and are currently held by Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company outside the issuing entity. The Hammons Hotel Portfolio companion loans have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $150,800,000 and are expected to be contributed to one or more future commercial mortgage securitization transactions. The Hammons Hotel Portfolio mortgage loan and the related companion loans will be serviced pursuant to the CGCMT 2015-GC33 pooling and servicing agreement. The Decoration & Design Building mortgage loan (evidenced by note A-2), which represents the non-controlling interest in The Decoration & Design Building loan combination, will be contributed to the issuing entity, has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $65,000,000 and represents approximately 6.8% of the Initial Pool Balance. The related companion loan (evidenced by note A-1) represents the controlling interest in The Decoration & Design Building loan combination and was contributed to the CGCMT 2015-P1 securitization transaction. The Decoration & Design Building companion loan has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $100,000,000. The Decoration & Design Building mortgage loan and the related companion loan will be serviced pursuant to the CGCMT 2015-P1 pooling and servicing agreement.

B-20

STRUCTURAL OVERVIEW (continued)
Loan Combinations (continued)	The Somerset Park Apartments mortgage loan (evidenced by notes A-1-3 and A-2-3), which represents a non-controlling interest in the Somerset Park Apartments loan combination, will be contributed to the issuing entity, has an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $36,500,000 and represents approximately 3.8% of the Initial Pool Balance. The related companion loans evidenced by notes A-1-1 and A-2-1 have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $73,500,000, represent the controlling interest in the Somerset Park Apartments loan combination and were contributed to the WFCM 2015-C30 securitization transaction. The related companion loans evidenced by notes A-1-2 and A-2-2 have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $70,000,00, represent a non-controlling interest in the Somerset Park Apartments loan combination and are currently held by Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC outside the issuing entity and are expected to be contributed to one or more future commercial mortgage securitization transactions. The Somerset Park Apartments mortgage loan and the related companion loans will be serviced pursuant to the WFCM 2015-C30 pooling and servicing agreement.
Servicing Standard	Each of the serviced loans will be serviced by the master servicer and the special servicer pursuant to the terms of the CGCMT 2015-GC33 pooling and servicing agreement. In all circumstances, each of the master servicer and the special servicer is obligated to act in the best interests of the certificateholders as a collective whole as if such certificateholders constituted a single lender. The special servicer is required to determine the effect on net present value of various courses of action (including workout or foreclosure), using the Calculation Rate as the discount rate, and pursue the course of action that it determines would maximize recovery on a net present value basis. “Calculation Rate” means: for principal and interest payments on a mortgage loan or proceeds from the sale of a defaulted loan, the highest of (i) the rate determined by the master servicer or the special servicer, as applicable, that approximates the market rate that would be obtainable by borrowers on similar debt of the borrowers as of such date of determination, (ii) the mortgage loan rate and (iii) the yield on 10-year US treasuries; and for all other cash flows, including property cash flow, the “discount rate” set forth in the most recent appraisal (or update of such appraisal).
Termination of Special Servicer	Prior to the occurrence and continuance of a Control Termination Event, the special servicer may be removed and replaced by the Controlling Class Representative (except with respect to any excluded mortgage loan) (a) for cause at any time and (b) without cause if either (i) LNR Partners, LLC or an affiliate thereof is no longer the special servicer or (ii) LNR Securities Holdings, LLC or an affiliate thereof owns less than 15% of the certificate principal amount of the then controlling class of certificates, in each case, upon satisfaction of certain conditions specified in the CGCMT 2015-GC33 pooling and servicing agreement. After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the holders of at least 25% of the voting rights of the certificates (other than the Class R certificates) may request a vote to replace the special servicer. The subsequent vote may result in the termination and replacement of the special servicer if, within 180 days of the initial request for that vote, the holders of (a) at least 75% of the voting rights of the certificates (other than the Class R certificates), or (b) more than 50% of the voting rights of each class of Non-Reduced Certificates (as defined under “Certain Definitions” below) vote affirmatively to so replace. Additionally, at any time after the occurrence and during the continuance of a Consultation Termination Event, if the operating advisor determines that the special servicer is not performing its duties as required under the CGCMT 2015-GC33 pooling and servicing agreement or is otherwise not acting in accordance with the servicing standard, the operating advisor may recommend the replacement of the special servicer (but not any outside special servicer for any outside serviced loan combination), resulting in a solicitation of a certificateholder vote. The subsequent vote may result in the termination and replacement of the special servicer if, within 180 days of the initial request for that vote, the holders of more than 50% of the voting rights of each class of Non-Reduced Certificates vote affirmatively to so replace. The related outside special servicer under each outside servicing agreement generally may be replaced by the related outside controlling class representative or the vote of the requisite holders of certificates issued under that outside servicing agreement (depending on whether or not a control termination event or a consultation termination event exists under that outside servicing agreement) in a manner similar to the manner in which the special servicer may be replaced under the CGCMT 2015-GC33 pooling and servicing agreement as described in the three preceding paragraphs. If the special servicer becomes a “borrower party” (as described in the Prospectus Supplement) with respect to a mortgage loan, the special servicer will not be permitted to act as special servicer with respect to that mortgage loan. Subject to certain limitations described in the Prospectus Supplement, the Controlling Class Representative (so long as it is not itself a borrower party and so long as no Control Termination Event shall have occurred and be continuing) will be entitled to appoint a replacement special servicer for that mortgage loan. If the Controlling Class Representative or any other certificateholder of the controlling class is precluded from appointing a replacement special servicer, a replacement special servicer will be appointed in the manner specified in the CGCMT 2015-GC33 pooling and servicing agreement.

B-21

STRUCTURAL OVERVIEW (continued) 

Servicing Compensation Modification Fees: Certain fees resulting from modifications, amendments, waivers or other changes to the terms of the loan documents, as more fully described in the Prospectus Supplement, will be used to offset expenses on the related serviced mortgage loan (i.e. reimburse the trust for certain expenses including unreimbursed advances and interest on unreimbursed advances previously incurred (other than special servicing fees, workout fees and liquidation fees) on the related serviced mortgage loan but not yet reimbursed to the trust or servicers or to pay expenses (other than special servicing fees, workout fees and liquidation fees) that are still outstanding in each case unless as part of the written modification the related borrower is required to pay these amounts on a going forward basis or in the future). Any excess modification fees not so applied to offset expenses will be available as compensation to the master servicer and/or special servicer. Within any prior 12 month period, all such excess modification fees earned by the master servicer or by the special servicer (after taking into account the offset described below applied during such 12-month period) with respect to any serviced mortgage loan will be subject to a cap equal to the greater of (i) 1% of the outstanding principal balance of such mortgage loan after giving effect to such transaction and (ii) $25,000. All excess modification fees earned by the special servicer will be required to offset any future workout fees or liquidation fees payable with respect to the related serviced mortgage loan or related REO property; provided, that if the serviced mortgage loan ceases being a corrected loan, and is subject to a subsequent modification, any excess modification fees earned by the special servicer prior to such serviced mortgage loan ceasing to be a corrected loan will no longer be offset against future liquidation fees and workout fees unless such serviced mortgage loan ceased to be a corrected loan within 18 months of it becoming a modified mortgage loan. Penalty Fees: All late fees and default interest will first be used to reimburse certain expenses previously incurred with respect to the related mortgage loan (other than special servicing fees, workout fees and liquidation fees) but not yet reimbursed to the trust, the master servicer or the special servicer or to pay certain expenses (other than special servicing fees, workout fees and liquidation fees) that are still outstanding on the related mortgage loan, and any excess received with respect to a serviced loan will be paid to the master servicer (for penalty fees accrued while a non-specially serviced loan) and the special servicer (for penalty fees accrued while a specially serviced loan). To the extent any amounts reimbursed out of penalty charges are subsequently recovered on a related serviced loan, they will be paid to the master servicer or special servicer who would have been entitled to the related penalty charges that were previously used to reimburse such expense.   Liquidation / Workout Fees: Liquidation fees will be calculated at the lesser of (a) 1.0% and (b) such rate as would result in a liquidation fee of $1,000,000, for each serviced loan that is a specially serviced loan and any REO property, subject in any case to a minimum liquidation fee of $25,000. For any serviced loan that is a corrected loan, workout fees will be calculated at the lesser of (a) 1.0% and (b) such rate as would result in a workout fee of $1,000,000 when applied to each expected payment of principal and interest (other than default interest) on the related serviced loan from the date such serviced loan becomes a corrected mortgage loan through and including the then related maturity date; or in any case such higher rate as would result in a workout fee of $25,000 when applied to each expected payment of principal and interest (other than default interest) on the related serviced loan from the date such serviced loan becomes a corrected loan through and including the then related maturity date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in connection with a maturity default, no liquidation or workout fee will be payable in connection with a payoff or refinancing of the related serviced loan within 90 days of the maturity default.   In the case of an outside serviced loan combination, calculation of the foregoing amounts payable to the related outside servicer or outside special servicer may be different than as described above. For example, the extent to which modification fees and penalty fees are applied to offset expenses may be different and liquidation fees and workout fees may be subject to different caps.

B-22

STRUCTURAL OVERVIEW (continued)

Operating Advisor

Prior to the occurrence of a Control Termination Event, the operating advisor will review certain information on the certificate administrator’s website, and will have access to any related final asset status report but will not have any approval or consultation rights. After a Control Termination Event, the operating advisor will have consultation rights with respect to certain major decisions with respect to the serviced loan(s) and will have additional monitoring responsibilities on behalf of the entire trust. After the occurrence and during the continuance of a Control Termination Event, the operating advisor will be entitled to consult with the special servicer with respect to certain major decisions on behalf of the issuing entity and in the best interest of, and for the benefit of, the certificateholders, as a collective whole, as if those certificateholders constituted a single lender. The operating advisor will be subject to termination if the holders of at least 15% of the voting rights of Non-Reduced Certificates vote to terminate and replace the operating advisor and such vote is approved by the holders of more than 50% of the voting rights of Non-Reduced Certificates that exercise their right to vote, provided that the holders of at least 50% of the voting rights of Non-Reduced Certificates have exercised their right to vote. The holders initiating such vote will be responsible for the fees and expenses in connection with the vote and replacement.

Deal Website

The certificate administrator will maintain a deal website including, but not limited to: — all special notices delivered — summaries of final asset status reports — all appraisals in connection with an appraisal reduction plus any subsequent appraisal updates — an “Investor Q&A Forum” and a voluntary investor registry

B-23

CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

■ “ADR”: For any hospitality property, average daily rate.

■ “Appraised Value”: With respect to each mortgaged property and any date of determination, the most current appraised value of such property as determined by an appraisal of the mortgaged property and in accordance with MAI standards made not more than five (5) months prior to the origination date of the related mortgage loan. The appraisals for certain of the mortgaged properties may state an “as complete,” “as stabilized,” “prospective market value upon completion,” “as repaired,” “hypothetical,” “prospective as-is” or ”as renovated” value (generally in addition to an “as-is” value) for such mortgaged properties assuming that certain events will occur with respect to the re-tenanting, renovation or other repositioning of the mortgaged property. With respect to each mortgaged property, the Appraised Value set forth in this Term Sheet and the Prospectus Supplement (including on Annex A thereto) is the “as-is” appraised value unless otherwise specified below and under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions—Appraised Value” in the Prospectus Supplement. With respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio mortgage loan, the Appraised Value represents the aggregate “as-is” appraised value of $363,750,000 plus a $3,570,502 capital deduction related to franchise mandated capital improvements at the three mortgaged properties for which the borrowers reserved $7,890,000 for the estimated mandatory and additional elective capital improvement costs. For purposes of calculating the Maturity Date LTV Ratio for certain mortgage loans, the “as stabilized” value of the related mortgaged property is the applicable Appraised Value in this Term Sheet. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Certain Calculations and Definitions” in the Prospectus Supplement for a description of Maturity Date LTV Ratio.

■ “Borrower Sponsor”: The indirect owner, or one of the indirect owners, of the related borrower (in whole or in part) that may or may not have control of the related borrower. The Borrower Sponsor may be, but is not necessarily, the entity that acts as the guarantor of the non-recourse carveouts.

■ “FF&E”: Furniture, fixtures and equipment.

■ “GLA”: Gross leasable area.

■ “Hard Lockbox”: Means that the borrower is required to direct the tenants to pay rents directly to a lockbox account controlled by the lender. Hospitality and multifamily properties are considered to have a hard lockbox if credit card receivables are required to be deposited directly into the lockbox account even though cash, checks or “over the counter” receipts are deposited by the manager of the related mortgaged property into the lockbox account controlled by the lender. With respect to the Mix at Midtown mortgage loan, certain tenants (including the largest tenant, 24 Hour Fitness) pay rent directly into a Hard Lockbox and the remaining tenants pay rent into a Soft Springing Lockbox.

■ “Non-owned Anchor(s)”: Tenants that occupy space equal to or greater than 30,000 SF at the related mortgaged property, which occupied space is not owned by the related borrower and is not part of the collateral for the related mortgage loan.

■ “Non-owned Junior Anchor(s)”: Tenants that occupy space equal to or greater than 10,000 SF at the related mortgaged property and less than 30,000 SF at the related mortgaged property, which occupied space is not owned by the related borrower and is not part of the collateral for the related mortgage loan.

■ “Non-owned Outparcel(s)”: Freestanding tenants that occupy space at the property that is separated from the rest of the tenants at the applicable mortgaged property which space occupied by those freestanding tenants is not owned by the related borrower and is not part of the collateral for the related mortgage loan.

■ “Non-Reduced Certificates”: Each class of certificates (other than Class R or Class X certificates)(considering each class of the Class A-S, Class B and Class C certificates, together with the Class PEZ certificates’ applicable percentage interest of the trust component with the same alphabetic class designation, as a single “Class” for such purpose) that has an outstanding certificate principal amount as may be notionally reduced by any appraisal reduction amounts allocated to that class, equal to or greater than 25% of an amount equal to the initial certificate principal amount of that class of certificates minus all principal payments made on such class of certificates.

■ “Occupancy Cost”: With respect to any mortgaged property, total rental revenues divided by total sales.

■ “Owned Anchor(s)”: Tenants that lease space equal to or greater than 30,000 SF at the related mortgaged property, which leased space is owned by the related borrower and is part of the collateral for the related mortgage loan.

■ “Owned GLA”: With respect to any particular mortgaged property, the GLA of the space that is owned by the related borrower and is part of the collateral.

■ “Owned Junior Anchor(s)”: Tenants that lease space equal to or greater than 10,000 SF and less than 30,000 SF at the related mortgaged property, which leased space is owned by the related borrower and is part of the collateral for the related mortgage loan.

■ “Owned Occupancy”: With respect to any particular mortgaged property, as of a certain date (or, in the case of a hospitality property, for a trailing 12-month period ending on a certain date), the percentage of net rentable square footage, available rooms, units or beds that are leased or rented (as applicable), solely with respect to the aggregate leased space, available rooms, units or beds in the property that is owned by the related borrower. In some cases Owned Occupancy was based on assumptions regarding occupancy, such as the assumption that a certain tenant at the mortgaged property that has executed a lease, but has not yet taken occupancy and/or has not yet commenced paying rent, will take occupancy on a future date generally expected to occur within twelve months after the Cut-off Date; assumptions regarding the renewal of particular leases and/or the re-leasing of certain space at the related mortgaged property; in some cases, assumptions regarding leases under negotiation being executed; in some cases, assumptions regarding tenants taking additional space in the future if currently committed to do so or, in some cases, the exclusion of dark tenants, tenants with material aged receivables, tenants that may have already given notice to vacate their space, bankrupt tenants that have not yet affirmed their lease and certain additional leasing assumptions.

B-24

CERTAIN DEFINITIONS (continued)

■ “Owned Outparcel(s)”: Freestanding tenants that occupy space at the property that is separated from the rest of the tenants at the applicable mortgaged property which space occupied by those freestanding tenants is owned by the related borrower and is part of the collateral for the related mortgage loan.

■ “Owned Tenant(s)”: Tenants whose leased space at the related mortgaged property is owned by the related borrower and is part of the collateral for the related mortgage loan.

■ “Rating Agency Confirmation”: With respect to any matter, confirmation in writing (which may be in electronic form) by the rating agencies engaged by the depositor that a proposed action, failure to act or other event so specified will not, in and of itself, result in the downgrade, qualification or withdrawal of the then current rating assigned by that rating agency to any class of certificates. However, such confirmation will be deemed received or not required in certain circumstances as further described in the Prospectus Supplement. See “The Pooling and Servicing Agreement—Rating Agency Confirmations” in the Prospectus Supplement.

■ “RevPAR”: With respect to any hospitality property, revenues per available room.

■ “SF”: Square feet.

■ “Soft Lockbox”: An account into which the related borrower is required to deposit or cause the property manager to deposit all rents collected. Hospitality and multifamily properties are considered to have a soft lockbox if credit card receivables, cash, checks or “over the counter” receipts are deposited into the lockbox account by the borrower or property manager.

■ “Soft Springing Lockbox”: An account into which the related borrower is required to deposit, or cause the property manager to deposit, all rents collected until the occurrence of an event of default or one or more specified trigger events under the related loan documents, at which time the lockbox converts to a Hard Lockbox.

■ “Springing Lockbox”: An account that is not currently in place, but the related loan documents require the imposition of a lockbox account upon the occurrence of an event of default or one or more specified trigger events under the related loan documents.

■ “Total Occupancy”: With respect to any particular mortgaged property, as of a certain date (or, in the case of a hospitality property, for a trailing 12-month period ending on a certain date), the percentage of net rentable square footage, available rooms, units or beds that are leased or rented (as applicable), for the aggregate leased space, available rooms, units or beds at the property, including any space that is owned by the related borrower and is part of the collateral in addition to any space that is owned by the applicable tenant and not part of the collateral for the related mortgage loan. In some cases Total Occupancy was based on assumptions regarding occupancy, such as the assumption that a certain tenant at the mortgaged property that has executed a lease, but has not yet taken occupancy and/or has not yet commenced paying rent, will take occupancy on a future date generally expected to occur within twelve months after the Cut-off Date; assumptions regarding the renewal of particular leases and/or the re-leasing of certain space at the related mortgaged property; in some cases, assumptions regarding leases under negotiation being executed; in some cases, assumptions regarding tenants taking additional space in the future if currently committed to do so or, in some cases, the exclusion of dark tenants, tenants with material aged receivables, tenants that may have already given notice to vacate their space, bankrupt tenants that have not yet affirmed their lease and certain additional leasing assumptions.

■ “TRIPRA”: Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015.

■ “TTM”: Trailing twelve months.

■ “Underwritten Expenses”: With respect to any mortgage loan or mortgaged property, an estimate of operating expenses, as determined by the related originator and generally derived from historical expenses at the mortgaged property(-ies), the borrower’s budget or appraiser’s estimate, in some cases adjusted for significant occupancy increases and a market-rate management fee. We cannot assure you that the assumptions made with respect to any mortgaged property will, in fact, be consistent with that mortgaged property’s actual performance.

■ “Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)”: With respect to any mortgage loan or mortgaged property, cash flow available for debt service, generally equal to the Underwritten NOI decreased by an amount that the related originator has determined for tenant improvements and leasing commissions and / or replacement reserves for capital items. Underwritten NCF does not reflect debt service or non-cash items such as depreciation or amortization. The Underwritten Net Cash Flow for each mortgaged property is calculated based on the basis of numerous assumptions and subjective judgments (including, but not limited to, with respect to future occupancy and rental rates), which, if ultimately proved erroneous, could cause the actual net cash flow for the mortgaged property to differ materially from the Underwritten Net Cash Flow set forth in this Term Sheet.

■ “Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)”: With respect to any mortgage loan or mortgaged property, Underwritten Revenues less Underwritten Expenses, as both are determined by the related originator, based in part upon borrower supplied information (including but not limited to a rent roll, leases, operating statements and budget) for a recent period which is generally the 12 months prior to the origination date or acquisition date of the mortgage loan (or loan combination, if applicable) adjusted for specific property, tenant and market considerations. Historical operating statements may not be available for newly constructed mortgaged properties, mortgaged properties with triple net leases, mortgaged properties that have recently undergone substantial renovations and/or newly acquired mortgaged properties.

B-25

CERTAIN DEFINITIONS (continued)

■ “Underwritten Revenues”: With respect to any mortgage loan or mortgaged property, an estimate of operating revenues, as determined by the related originator and generally derived from the rental revenue (which may include rental revenue related to reimbursement of tenant improvements and leasing commissions) based on leases in place, leases that have been executed but the tenant is not yet paying rent, month-to-month leases (based on current rent roll and annualized), in certain cases leases that are being negotiated and are expected to be signed, in certain cases leases that provide for a tenant to take additional space as described under “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Tenant Issues” in the Prospectus Supplement to the extent material, and in certain cases contractual rent steps generally within 16 months past the Cut-off Date, in certain cases certain appraiser estimates of rental income, and in some cases adjusted downward to market rates, with vacancy rates equal to the mortgaged property’s historical rate, current rate, market rate or an assumed vacancy as determined by the related originator; plus any additional recurring revenue fees. Additionally, in determining rental revenue for multifamily rental and self storage properties, the related originator either reviewed rental revenue shown on the certified rolling 12-month operating statements or annualized the rental revenue and reimbursement of expenses shown on rent rolls or recent partial year operating statements with respect to the prior one- to 12-month period or in some cases may have relied on information provided in the appraisal for market rental rates and vacancy. In certain cases, with respect to mortgaged properties with leases with rent increases or rent decreases during the term of the related mortgage loan, Underwritten Revenues were based on the average rent over the term of the mortgage loan. In certain cases, the related originator included revenue otherwise payable by a tenant but for the existence of an initial “free rent” period or a permitted rent abatement while the leased space is built out. We cannot assure you that the assumptions made with respect to any mortgaged property will, in fact, be consistent with that mortgaged property’s actual performance.

B-26

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

B-27

ILLINOIS CENTER

B-28

ILLINOIS CENTER

B-29

ILLINOIS CENTER

B-30

ILLINOIS CENTER

B-31

ILLINOIS CENTER

B-32

ILLINOIS CENTER

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	2	Loan Seller	CGMRC
Location (City/State)	Chicago, Illinois	Cut-off Date Principal Balance(2)	$100,000,000
Property Type	Office	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per SF(1)	$124.29
Size (SF)	2,091,889	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance	10.4%
Total Occupancy as of 6/29/2015	72.3%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans	None
Owned Occupancy as of 6/29/2015	72.3%	Type of Security	Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	Various / Various	Mortgage Rate	4.4950%
Appraised Value	$390,000,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)	120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)	360
		Original Interest Only Term (Months)	60
Underwritten Revenues	$53,299,974
Underwritten Expenses	$29,752,726		Escrows
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$23,547,248		Upfront	Monthly
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$21,333,686	Taxes	$1,922,899	$961,450
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1)	66.7%	Insurance	$0	$0
Maturity Date LTV Ratio(1)	50.6%	Replacement Reserve	$0	$34,865
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF(1)	1.49x /1.35x	TI/LC(3)	$12,500,000	$0
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF(1)	9.1% / 8.2%	Other(4)	$18,182,623	$0

Sources and Uses
Sources	$	%	Uses	$	%
Loan Amount	$260,000,000	62.7%	Purchase Price	$376,000,000	90.6%
Principal’s Equity Contribution	139,913,237	33.7	Reserves	32,605,522	7.9
Other Sources	15,081,343	3.6	Closing Costs	6,189,058	1.5
Total Sources	$414,794,580	100.0%	Total Uses	$414,794,580	100.0%

(1) Calculated based on the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the Illinois Center Loan Combination (as defined below).

(2) The Illinois Center Loan, with an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $100,000,000, is evidenced by the controlling note A-1, and is part of the $260,000,000 Illinois Center Loan Combination, which is evidenced by three pari passu notes. The companion loans, evidenced by the non-controlling notes A-2 and A-3, which have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $160,000,000, are expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization transactions. See “— The Mortgage Loan” below.

(3) Subject to reduction and cap upon certain conditions. See “—Escrows” below.

(4) Other upfront reserves represent rent concessions of $9,522,058, unfunded obligations of $7,841,315 and deferred maintenance of $819,250 for façade repairs. See “—Escrows” below.

■ The Mortgage Loan. The mortgage loan (the “Illinois Center Loan”) is part of a loan combination (the “Illinois Center Loan Combination”) evidenced by three pari passu notes that are together secured by a first mortgage encumbering the borrowers’ fee simple interest in two adjacent office buildings with ground floor retail in Chicago, Illinois (the “Illinois Center Property”). The Illinois Center Loan, which is evidenced by note A-1 and represents the controlling interest in the Illinois Center Loan Combination, had an original principal balance of $100,000,000, has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $100,000,000 and represents approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance. The related companion loans (the “Illinois Center Companion Loans”), which are evidenced by notes A-2 and A-3 and represent the non-controlling interest in the Illinois Center Loan Combination, had an aggregate original principal balance of $160,000,000, have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $160,000,000 and are expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization transactions. The Illinois Center Loan Combination was originated by Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. on August 4, 2015. The Illinois Center Loan Combination had an original principal balance of $260,000,000, has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $260,000,000 and accrues interest at an interest rate of 4.4950% per annum. The proceeds of the Illinois Center Loan Combination were used to acquire the Illinois Center Property, pay origination costs and fund reserves.

The Illinois Center Loan had an initial term of 120 months, and has a remaining term as of the Cut-off Date of 119 months. The Illinois Center Loan requires interest only payments on each due date through and including the due date occurring in August 2020 and thereafter requires payments of interest and principal based on a 30-year amortization schedule. The scheduled maturity date of the Illinois Center Loan is the due date in August 2025. Voluntary prepayment of the Illinois Center Loan without payment of any prepayment premium is permitted on or after the due date in April 2025. Provided no event of default under the Illinois Center Loan documents has occurred and is continuing, at any time prior to the maturity date and after the earlier to occur of (i) the second anniversary of the closing date of the securitization into which the last piece of the Illinois Center Loan Combination is deposited and (ii) the third anniversary of the origination of the Illinois Center Loan, the Illinois Center Loan may be defeased with certain direct, non-callable obligations of the United States of America or other obligations which are “government securities” permitted under the Illinois Center Loan documents.

B-33

ILLINOIS CENTER

■ The Mortgaged Property. The Illinois Center Property consists of two adjoining Class A office towers that comprise part of the Illinois Center complex: 111 East Wacker, consisting of 1,018,462 SF and constructed in 1969, and 233 North Michigan Avenue, consisting of 1,073,427 SF and constructed in 1972. Both buildings underwent renovations between 2011 and 2014. The buildings are connected by a main concourse area at the second level, along with a lower-level pedestrian concourse and four levels of subterranean parking which contains 872 parking spaces for a parking ratio of 0.41. The typical floor plate is approximately 34,000 SF. Total Occupancy and Owned Occupancy at the Illinois Center Property were both 72.3% as of June 29, 2015.

The following table presents certain information relating to the major tenants at the Illinois Center Property:

Tenant Name	Tenant Description	Renewal/Extension Options
General Services Administration	General Services Administration leases the space on behalf of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”). HHS provides for effective health and human services and fosters advances in medicine, public health, and social services. The Region 5 division serves state and local organizations in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin. According to the 2014 Summary of Performance and Financial Information, HHS reported total assets of $482.3 billion and a net position of $358.2 billion.	NA
Bankers Life and Casualty	Founded in 1879, Bankers Life provides life and health insurance products for Americans who are near or in retirement. With over 300 offices nationwide, Bankers Life serves over 1.4 million customers. Bankers Life is a part of CNO Financial Group which reported financials for Calendar Year End (“CYE”) 2014 with total assets of $31.2 billion and a net income of $51.4 million, which can be compared to financials for CYE 2013 with total assets of $34.8 billion and a net income of $478 million.	2, 5-year options
Combined Insurance Company	Combined Insurance Company specializes in supplemental insurance and offers products in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company was founded in 1922 and sold to current owner ACE Limited (NYSE: ACE) in 2008. ACE Limited is the parent company of ACE Group, a multiline property and casualty insurer with operations in 54 countries. ACE Limited reported financials for CYE 2014 with total assets of $98.2 billion and a net income of $2.9 billion, which can be compared to CYE 2013 with total assets of $94.5 billion and a net income of $3.8 billion.	2, 5-year options
Clear Channel Broadcasting	IHeartMedia, Inc. (OTCBB: IHRT), formerly known as Clear Channel Broadcasting, owns and operates 858 broadcast radio stations and the industry-leading iHeartRadio digital service, serving more than 245 million monthly listeners.	1, 5-year option
Young & Rubicam, Inc.	Young & Rubicam, Inc. (“Y&R”) is a marketing and communications company specializing in advertising, digital and social media, sales promotion, direct marketing and brand identity consulting. Y&R is one of the world’s  largest consumer advertising agencies. Its advertising ranks as the world’s 10th largest advertising agency, with revenues of approximately $907 million.	1, 5-year option

B-34

ILLINOIS CENTER

The following table presents certain information relating to the major tenants at the Illinois Center Property:

Ten Largest Tenants Based on Underwritten Base Rent

Tenant Name	Credit Rating (Fitch/MIS/S&P)(1)	Tenant GLA	% of GLA		UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent		UW Base Rent $ per SF	Lease Expiration	Renewal / Extension Options
General Services Administration	NR / Aaa / NR	184,042	8.8	%	$5,109,580	16.6	%	$27.76	11/30/2020	NA
Bankers Life and Casualty(2)	BB+ / Ba1 / BB+	139,252	6.7		2,710,612	8.8		19.47	8/31/2023	2, 5-year options
Combined Insurance Company(3)	NR / NR / NR	99,204	4.7		1,717,364	5.6		17.31	7/14/2021	2, 5-year options
Clear Channel Broadcasting	NR / NR / NR	73,353	3.5		1,441,860	4.7		19.66	7/31/2024	1, 5-year option
Young & Rubicam, Inc.	BBB+ / NR / BBB	69,292	3.3		1,323,477	4.3		19.10	11/30/2018	1, 5-year option
Zenith Media Services, Inc.(4)	NR / Baa2 / BBB+	66,768	3.2		1,300,036	4.2		19.47	7/31/2019	1, 5-year option
Taft Stettinius & Hollister	NR / NR / NR	69,298	3.3		1,175,690	3.8		16.97	5/31/2025	1, 5-year option
American Health Information	NR / NR / NR	34,780	1.7		702,904	2.3		20.21	10/31/2024	1, 5-year option
Burrell Communications Group(5)	NR / NR / NR	34,508	1.6		690,160	2.2		20.00	12/31/2023	NA
State Boards of Nursing	NR / NR / NR	35,174	1.7		666,036	2.2		18.94	4/30/2022	1, 5-year option
Ten Largest Tenants		805,671	38.5	%	$16,837,718	54.7	%	$20.90
Remaining Tenants		707,060	33.8		13,949,676	45.3		19.73
Vacant		579,158	27.7		0	0.0		0.00
Total / Wtd. Avg. All Tenants		2,091,889	100.0	%	$30,787,394	100.0	%	$20.35

(1) Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease.

(2) Bankers Life and Casualty has the right to reduce its premises by 16,500 to 17,500 SF on August 31, 2019.

(3) Combined Insurance Company has a contraction right to reduce its premises by 20,000 SF on July 14, 2017 with between 14 to 18 months’ notice and payment of a contraction fee. The tenant also has an option to terminate all of its premises on July 14, 2018 with at least 12 months’ notice and payment of a termination fee.

(4) Zenith Media Services, Inc. has an option to terminate all of its premises on January 31, 2017 with 12 months’ notice.

(5) Burrell Communications Group has an option to terminate all of its premises on December 31, 2021 with 12 months’ notice.

The following table presents the lease rollover schedule at the Illinois Center Property, based on initial lease expiration dates:

Lease Expiration Schedule⁽¹⁾

Year Ending December 31,	Expiring Owned GLA	% of Owned GLA	Cumulative % of Owned GLA	UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent	UW Base Rent $ per SF	# of Expiring Tenants
MTM(2)	20,938	1.0%	1.0%	$126,257	0.4%	$6.03	16
2015	16,165	0.8	1.8%	393,569	1.3	24.35	5
2016	118,800	5.7	7.5%	2,345,795	7.6	19.75	23
2017	108,617	5.2	12.6%	2,312,555	7.5	21.29	19
2018	129,786	6.2	18.8%	2,620,885	8.5	20.19	19
2019	100,655	4.8	23.7%	1,918,218	6.2	19.06	7
2020	249,393	11.9	35.6%	6,232,832	20.2	24.99	10
2021	169,498	8.1	43.7%	3,073,096	10.0	18.13	7
2022	48,956	2.3	46.0%	1,044,309	3.4	21.33	4
2023	223,270	10.7	56.7%	4,626,316	15.0	20.72	8
2024	144,061	6.9	63.6%	2,761,571	9.0	19.17	4
2025	94,294	4.5	68.1%	1,783,062	5.8	18.91	4
2026 & Thereafter	88,298	4.2	72.3%	1,548,929	5.0	17.54	6
Vacant	579,158	27.7	100.0%	0	0.0	0.00	0
Total / Wtd. Avg.	2,091,889	100.0%		$30,787,394	100.0%	$20.35	132

(1) Calculated based on approximate square footage occupied by each Owned Tenant.

(2) Approximately 16,599 SF of the month-to-month space represents non-rentable space at the Illinois Center Property. Such space is currently utilized as a conference center, fitness center and security and management office and does not contribute any rental income.

B-35

ILLINOIS CENTER

The following table presents certain information relating to historical leasing at the Illinois Center Property:

Historical Leased %⁽¹⁾

	2010(2)	2011(2)	2012(2)	2013(2)	2014(2)	As of 6/29/2015
Owned Space	84.0%	90.9%	82.9%	74.9%	73.6%	72.3%

(1) As provided by the borrowers and which reflects average occupancy for the specified year unless otherwise indicated.

(2) The Illinois Center Property was remeasured in 2013/2014 resulting in increased total rentable square footage. Historical occupancy figures are based on total square footage of 2,026,835 for all years prior to 2015.

The following table presents certain information relating to the historical average annual rent per SF at the Illinois Center Property:

Historical Average Base Rent per SF⁽¹⁾

	2013	2014	TTM 6/30/2015
Base Rent per SF (Triple Net Basis)	$17.06	$17.38	$15.11

(1) Base Rent per SF calculation is based on borrower-provided rental figures and total square footage of 2,026,835 for years 2013 and 2014. The Illinois Center Property was acquired by the borrowers in 2015, and operating statements for years prior to 2013 were not provided.

B-36

ILLINOIS CENTER

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Illinois Center Property:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

	2013	2014	TTM 6/30/2015(2) (3)	Underwritten(2)	Underwritten $ per SF
Base Rent	$25,897,606	$23,366,087	22,853,746	$29,093,671	$19.23
Contractual Rent Steps(4)	0	0	0	1,693,723	1.12
Gross Up Vacancy	0	0	0	18,079,522	11.95
Total Rent	$25,897,606	$23,366,087	$22,853,746	$48,866,916	$32.30
Total Reimbursables	16,224,217	14,398,844	15,954,033	16,694,403	11.04
Parking Income	4,572,178	4,840,830	4,925,213	4,925,213	3.26
Other Income(5)	860,193	846,936	892,964	892,964	0.59
Vacancy & Credit Loss	(70,052)	(256,544)	(683,173)	(18,079,522)	(11.95)
Effective Gross Income	$47,484,142	$43,196,152	$43,942,782	$53,299,974	$35.23
Real Estate Taxes	$12,058,223	$10,971,204	$10,893,219	$11,309,640	$7.48
Insurance	392,576	340,584	283,298	523,401	0.35
Management Fee	1,290,956	1,174,443	1,148,016	1,000,000	0.66
Other Operating Expenses	14,699,244	16,364,606	16,765,036	16,919,685	11.18
Total Operating Expenses	$28,440,999	$28,850,838	$29,089,569	$29,752,726	$19.67
Net Operating Income	$19,043,143	$14,345,314	$14,853,213	$23,547,248	$15.57
TI/LC	0	0	0	1,795,184	1.19
Replacement Reserves	0	0	0	418,378	0.28
Net Cash Flow	$19,043,143	$14,345,314	$14,853,213	$21,333,686	$14.10

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, lease cancellation income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) The increase between TTM 6/30/2015 and Underwritten Effective Gross Income is primarily due to an increase in Base Rent and Total Reimbursements from new leases signed during the first half of 2015, rent credits or abatements provided to tenants under the leases, and Contractual Rent Steps. The 2013, 2014, and TTM 6/30/2015 Effective Gross Income is based on actual collections during that time period. Underwritten Effective Gross Income is based on the actual leases in-place and does not take into account any rent credits or abatements provided to tenants under the leases. On the origination date of the Illinois Center Loan, the borrowers funded a reserve of $9,522,058 for all future rent credits or abatements under leases at the Illinois Center Property in place as of the Illinois Center Loan origination date.

(3) The Net Operating Income for the period beginning on January 1, 2015 and ending on June 30, 2015 was $9,694,657.

(4) Contractual Rent Steps are underwritten based upon the actual scheduled rent increases through August 1, 2016 for 111 East Wacker, the actual scheduled rent increases through December 1, 2016 for 233 North Michigan Avenue, and the present value of contractual rent steps (discounted at 8.0%) for Bankers Life & Casualty, Combined Insurance Company, Zenith Media Services, Inc., McDonald’s and Citibank, N.A.

(5) Other income includes other services income, design directory income, miscellaneous license agreements, and miscellaneous income.

■ Appraisal. According to the appraisal, the Illinois Center Property had an “as-is” appraised value of $390,000,000 as of June 24, 2015 and an “as stabilized” appraised value of $470,000,000 as of July 1, 2017 based on an assumed stabilized occupancy rate of 89.0%.

■ Environmental Matters. Based on the Phase I environmental report dated August 4, 2015, there were no recommendations for further action for the Illinois Center Property other than the continuation of an operations and maintenance plan for asbestos specifically for the 111 East Wacker property, which was in place at origination of the Illinois Center Loan.

■ Market Overview and Competition. The Illinois Center Property is located between North Michigan and Stetson avenues on East Wacker in Chicago’s Central Business District. Land uses in the immediate area west of Michigan Avenue primarily consist of a mixture of mid- to high-rise commercial office and retail properties, hotels, and government facilities. Millennium and Grant Parks, as well as the Art Institute of Chicago are located to the east of the Illinois Center Property on Michigan Avenue. The Chicago Transit Authority elevated tracks are situated just one block west of the Illinois Center Property at Randolph Street and Wabash Avenue. The Illinois Center Property is also three blocks north of Congress Parkway, which becomes Interstate 290, and one mile east of Interstate 90/94. According to the appraisal, the 2015 population within the 0.25-, 0.5-, and 1.0-mile radii are 5,041, 29,355, and 73,280, respectively. The 2015 estimated average household income within the 0.25-, 0.5-, and 1.0-mile radii are $121,665, $123,924 and $124,390, respectively.

The Illinois Center Property is part of the East Loop submarket which is generally bounded by the Chicago River along the north and west, Lake Michigan on the east and Congress Parkway on the south. Per the appraiser, the East Loop submarket is comprised of 22 million SF with a current vacancy of 15.8% and average gross asking

B-37

ILLINOIS CENTER

rent of $33.57 per SF as of the first quarter of 2015. There is no new office construction specific to the East Loop underway or proposed.

The appraiser has identified five office lease comparables which have occupancy rates between 61% to 99% and quoted base rent of $16.00 to $26.00 per SF. The appraiser concluded a base rental rate of between $17.00 to $19.00 per SF for the office space, $55.00 and $80.00 per SF for the retail space at the 111 East Wacker property and the 233 North Michigan Avenue property, respectively, and $15.00 per SF for storage space. The appraiser also concluded a stabilized vacancy rate of 11% for the Illinois Center Property.

The following table presents certain information relating to certain office lease comparables provided in the appraisal for the Illinois Center Property:

Office Lease Comparables⁽¹⁾

	Illinois Center Property	One & Two Prudential Plaza	Aon Center	Borg Warner Building	Three Illinois Center	200 North LaSalle
Address	111 E. Wacker Drive & 233 North Michigan Avenue	130 East Randolph Street & 180 North Stetson Avenue	200 E. Randolph	200 South Michigan Avenue	303 E. Wacker Drive	200 North LaSalle Street
Year Built / Renovated	1969, 1972 / 2011-2014	1955 / NAP	1972 / NAP	1957 / NAP	1979 / NAP	1984 / NAP
Total GLA	2,091,889	2,194,385	2,577,318	358,802	859,187	645,170
Occupancy%	72%	65%	83%	88%	61%	99%
Quoted Base Rent	-	$18.00 - $26.00	$18.00 - $22.00	$16.00 - $18.00	$17.00 - 22.00	$18.00 - $20.00
Expense Basis		Triple Net	Triple Net	Triple Net	Triple Net	Triple Net

(1) Source: Appraisal.

■ The Borrowers. The borrowers are IC 233 Building Company LLC and IC 111 Building Company LLC, two single-purpose, single-asset Delaware limited liability companies. Legal counsel to the borrowers delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the Illinois Center Loan. The guarantor of the non-recourse carveouts is Michael Karfunkel.

Michael Karfunkel founded AmTrust Realty Corp. in 1993. AmTrust Realty Corp. owns eight million SF of commercial real estate including 59 Maiden Lane and 250 Broadway in downtown Manhattan, 303 South Broadway in Tarrytown, NY, AXA Towers in Syracuse, NY, 135 South LaSalle, 33 West Monroe, and 1 East Wacker Drive in Chicago, and Fifth Third Center in Toledo, OH.

■ Escrows. On the origination date of the Illinois Center Loan, the borrowers funded a reserve of (i) $1,922,899 for real estate taxes, (ii) $12,500,000 for tenant improvements and leasing commissions, (iii) $9,522,058 representing the amount of future rent credits or abatements under leases at the Illinois Center Property in place as of the Illinois Center Loan origination date, (iv) $7,841,315 for unfunded tenant improvement and leasing commission obligations under leases at the Illinois Center Property in place as of the Illinois Center Loan origination date, and (v) $819,250 for deferred maintenance.

On each due date, the borrowers are required to pay to the lender (i) one-twelfth of the taxes that the lender estimates will be payable during the next ensuing 12 months, (ii) at the option of the lender, if the liability or casualty policy maintained by the borrowers does not constitute an approved blanket or umbrella insurance policy under the Illinois Center Loan documents, an insurance reserve in an amount equal to one-twelfth of the amount that the lender estimates will be necessary to pay insurance premiums over the then succeeding 12-month period, (iii) a tenant improvements and leasing commissions reserve (the “Leasing Reserve”) subject to suspension and/or reduction as set forth below, and (iv) a replacement reserve in the amount of $34,865.

B-38

ILLINOIS CENTER

The borrowers are not required to make a monthly Leasing Reserve payment unless the Leasing Reserve account falls below a minimum balance (initially, $7,500,000), after which the borrowers must pay the Leasing Reserve monthly payment until the Leasing Reserve equals or exceeds the Leasing Reserve cap (initially, $15,000,000). If the Illinois Center Property achieves a debt yield of 10% (as determined by the lender in its reasonable discretion) for two consecutive calendar quarters, the Leasing Reserve cap will be reduced to $6,000,000 and the minimum balance will be reduced to $2,500,000. If for two consecutive calendar quarters (i) the Illinois Center Property achieves a debt yield of 13% (as determined by the lender in its reasonable discretion) and (ii) the physical occupancy rate for the Illinois Center Property equals or exceeds 95%, the Leasing Reserve cap will be reduced to $2,500,000, the minimum balance will be reduced to $0, and the Leasing Reserve monthly deposit amount will be reduced to $87,162.

■ Lockbox and Cash Management. The Illinois Center Loan documents require a hard lockbox with springing cash management. The Illinois Center Loan documents require the borrowers to direct all tenants to pay rent directly to a lender-controlled lockbox account and require that all other money received by the borrowers with respect to the Illinois Center Property be promptly deposited into such lockbox account following receipt. So long as an Illinois Center Trigger Period (as defined below) is not in effect, all funds in the lockbox account are required to be swept and remitted on each business day to the borrowers’ operating account. During the continuance of an Illinois Center Trigger Period, all funds in the lockbox account are required to be transferred on each business day to a lender-controlled cash management account, and, provided no event of default under the Illinois Center Loan documents is continuing, applied to pay debt service and operating expenses of the Illinois Center Property and to fund required reserves in accordance with the Illinois Center Loan documents. After the foregoing disbursements are made and so long as an Illinois Center Trigger Period is continuing, all excess cash is trapped in an excess cash account and held as additional collateral for the Illinois Center Loan. During the continuance of an event of default under the Illinois Center Loan documents, the lender may apply any funds in the cash management account to amounts payable under the Illinois Center Loan and/or toward the payment of expenses of the Illinois Center Property, in such order of priority as the lender may determine.

An “Illinois Center Trigger Period” means a period (i) commencing upon the occurrence of an event of default under the Illinois Center Loan documents and continuing until the same is cured, or (ii) commencing on the date that the debt service coverage ratio is less than 1.15x and continuing until the debt service coverage ratio is equal to or greater than 1.15x for two consecutive calendar quarters.

■ Property Management. The Illinois Center Property is currently managed by AmTrust Realty Corp., an affiliate of the borrowers. Under the Illinois Center Loan documents, the Illinois Center Property may not be managed by any party other than AmTrust Realty Corp.; provided, however, that so long as no event of default under the Illinois Center Loan documents exists, the borrowers can replace AmTrust Realty Corp. with a property manager upon notice to the lender, provided that (i) the replacement would not cause a termination right, right of first refusal, first offer or any other similar right or cause any termination fees to be due or cause a material adverse effect to occur under any reciprocal easement agreement or certain other documents affecting the Illinois Center Property, (ii) the replacement property manager meets certain criteria and is reasonably approved by the lender in writing, or is otherwise approved by the lender in writing (which approval may be conditioned upon receipt of a rating agency confirmation) and (iii) if such property manager is an affiliate of the borrowers, a new non-consolidation opinion is provided from the borrowers’ counsel. The lender has the right to terminate the management agreement and replace the property manager or require that the borrowers terminate the management agreement and replace the property manager if (a) the property manager becomes a debtor in (i) any involuntary bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding that is not dismissed within 90 days of the filing thereof or (ii) any voluntary bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding, (b) there exists an Illinois Center Trigger Period, (c) the property manager has engaged in gross negligence, fraud, willful misconduct or misappropriation of funds or (d) there exists a default by the property manager beyond all applicable notice and cure periods under the management agreement.

B-39

ILLINOIS CENTER

Parking at the Illinois Center Property is managed by System Parking, Inc., and the borrowers have the right to replace the parking manager upon notice to the lender provided that (i) no event of default has occurred and is continuing under the Illinois Center Loan documents, (ii) the borrowers deliver an officer’s certificate certifying that the replacement would not cause a termination right, right of first refusal, first offer or any other similar right or cause any termination fees to be due or cause a material adverse effect to occur under any reciprocal easement agreement or certain other Illinois Center Loan documents, and (iii) the replacement parking manager is one of certain specified parking managers and the replacement parking management agreement meets certain terms.

■ Mezzanine or Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.

■ Terrorism Insurance. The borrowers are required to maintain (x) an “all-risk” insurance policy that provides coverage for terrorism in an amount equal to the full replacement cost of the Illinois Center Property and (y) business interruption coverage with no exclusion for terrorism that provides no less than 18 months of coverage in an amount equal to 100% of the projected gross income from the Illinois Center Property (on an actual loss sustained basis) for a period continuing until the restoration of the Illinois Center Property is completed, and containing an extended period endorsement which provides for up to six months of additional coverage. The “all-risk” policy containing terrorism insurance is required to contain a deductible that is no higher than $25,000. See “Risk Factors—Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties” in the Prospectus Supplement.

B-40

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

B-41

HAMMONS HOTEL PORTFOLIO

 

B-42

HAMMONS HOTEL PORTFOLIO

B-43

HAMMONS HOTEL PORTFOLIO

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	7	Loan Seller	GSMC
Location (City/State)	Various	Cut-off Date Principal Balance(4)	$100,000,000
Property Type	Hospitality	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per Room(2)	$134,189.41
Size (Rooms)	1,869	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance	10.4%
Total TTM Occupancy as of 6/30/2015	74.9%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans	None
Owned TTM Occupancy as of 6/30/2015	74.9%	Type of Security	Fee Simple / Leasehold
Year Built / Latest Renovation	2006, 2007, 2008, 2010 / 2015	Mortgage Rate	4.9535%
Appraised Value(1)	$367,320,502	Original Term to Maturity (Months)	120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)	360
		Original Interest Only Period (Months)	NAP
Underwritten Revenues	$104,481,960
Underwritten Expenses	$73,369,148
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$31,112,812	Escrows
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$26,933,534		Upfront	Monthly
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1)(2)	68.3%	Taxes	$3,172,482	$358,585
Maturity Date LTV Ratio(2)(3)	55.5%	Insurance	$0	$0
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF(2)	1.94x / 1.68x	FF&E(5)	$0	$360,433
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF(2)	12.4% / 10.7%	Other(6)	$8,562,974	$98,159

Sources and Uses
Sources	$	%	Uses	$	%
Loan Combination Amount	$250,800,000	100.0%	Loan Payoff	$214,972,179	85.7%
			Principal Equity Distribution	20,464,715	8.2
			Reserves	11,735,456	4.7
			Closing Costs	3,627,650	1.4
Total Sources	$250,800,000	100.0%	Total Uses	$250,800,000	100.0%

(1) The Appraised Value represents the aggregate “as-is” appraised value of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties of $363,750,000 plus a $3,570,502 capital deduction related to franchise mandated capital improvements at the three Marriott properties for which the borrowers reserved $7,890,000 for the estimated mandatory and additional elective capital improvement costs. The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio calculated on the basis of the aggregate “as-is” appraised value without adding the capital deduction is 68.9%. See “—Appraisals” below.

(2) Calculated based on the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination.

(3) The Maturity Date LTV Ratio is calculated utilizing the aggregate “as stabilized” appraised value of $371,300,000 which includes “as stabilized” appraised values for three of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties. The Maturity Date LTV Ratio calculated on the basis of the aggregate “as-is” appraised value adding the $3,570,502 capital deduction is 56.1% and the Maturity Date LTV Ratio calculated on the basis of the aggregate “as-is” appraised value without adding the $3,570,502 capital deduction is 56.6%. See “—Appraisals” below.

(4) The Cut-off Date Principal Balance of $100,000,000 represents the controlling note A-1 of a $250,800,000 loan combination evidenced by four pari passu notes. The related companion loans, evidenced by the non-controlling note A-2, note A-3 and note A-4 with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $150,800,000, are expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization transactions.

(5) On each due date, the borrowers are required to fund the FF&E reserve in an amount equal to the greater of (i) any franchise-mandated amount and (ii) 4.0% of the actual revenues from the respective properties for the most recently ended calendar month. See “—Escrows” below.

(6) Other reserve represents property improvement costs ($7,890,000) and a ground lease reserve ($672,974 upfront and $98,159 monthly). See “—Escrows” below.

■ The Mortgage Loan. The mortgage loan (the “Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan”) is part of a loan combination (the “Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination”) evidenced by four pari passu notes that are secured by first mortgages encumbering the borrowers’ fee simple and/or leasehold interests in a portfolio of full service, limited service and extended stay hotels located in various states (each individually, a “Hammons Hotel Portfolio Property” and, collectively, the “Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties”). The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan (evidenced by note A-1), which represents the controlling interest in the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination, will be contributed to the Issuing Entity, has an outstanding balance as of the Cut-off Date of $100,000,000 and represents approximately 10.4% of the Initial Pool Balance. The related companion loans (the “Hammons Hotel Portfolio Companion Loans”), which have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $150,800,000andare evidenced by note A-2, note A-3 and note A-4, each of which represents a non-controlling interest in the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination and is currently held by Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company outside of the Issuing Entity, are expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization transactions. The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination was originated by Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company on August 13, 2015. The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination has an original principal balance of $250,800,000 and each note has an interest rate of 4.9535% per annum. The borrowers utilized the proceeds of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination to refinance the existing debt on the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties, fund reserves, pay origination costs and return equity to the borrower sponsor.

B-44

HAMMONS HOTEL PORTFOLIO

The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan had an initial term of 120 months and has a remaining term of 120 months as of the Cut-off Date. The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan requires monthly payments of interest and principal sufficient to amortize the loan over a 30-year amortization schedule. The scheduled maturity date of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan is the due date in September 2025. Other than in connection with the release of a Hammons Hotel Portfolio Property as described under “—Release of Collateral” below, voluntary prepayment of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan is prohibited prior to the due date in June 2025. Provided that no event of default under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination is continuing, defeasance with direct, non-callable obligations of the United States of America is permitted at any time on or after the first due date following the earlier of (a) the third anniversary of the origination date of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan and (b) the second anniversary of the closing date of the securitization into which the last piece of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination is deposited.

In addition, at any time on or after the first due date following the earlier of (a) the third anniversary of the origination date of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan and (b) the second anniversary of the closing date of the securitization into which the last piece of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination is deposited, in connection with defeasance of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan, the borrower is permitted to prepay the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Property only to the extent necessary to cause the debt service coverage ratio (as calculated under the related loan documents) for the related trailing 12-month period (ending on the last day of any fiscal quarter) to be no less than the greater of (a) 1.86x and (b) the debt service coverage ratio immediately prior to the release and which prepayment is required to include the applicable yield maintenance premium (as described under the related loan documents).

■ The Mortgaged Properties. The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties consist of seven hotels totaling 1,869 rooms, including four Embassy Suites hotels, one Courtyard by Marriott hotel, one Residence Inn by Marriott hotel and one Renaissance by Marriott hotel. Four of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties have convention centers located immediately adjacent to the respective hotel and are included as collateral for the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan. The borrower sponsor developed the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties between 2006 and 2010, with an estimated cost basis in excess of $378,000,000.

Embassy Suites Concord, NC Property

The Embassy Suites Concord, NC Property opened in 2007 and consists of a 308-room, full service hotel and an adjacent approximately 42,000 SF convention center located in Concord, North Carolina, east of Charlotte. The respective borrower has a fee simple ownership interest in the hotel and a leasehold ownership interest in the convention center at the Embassy Suites Concord, NC Property. There are no significant planned renovations at the Embassy Suites Concord, NC Property.

Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN Property

The Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN Property opened in 2008 and consists of a 283-room, full service hotel and an adjacent approximately 41,802 SF convention center located in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, just south of Nashville. An owner of the respective borrower has a fee simple ownership interest in the Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN Property. Approximately $26,400 of underwritten revenue is attributed to third-party antenna leases at the Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN Property. There are no significant planned renovations at the Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN Property.

Embassy Suites Norman, OK Property

The Embassy Suites Norman, OK Property opened in 2008 and consists of a 283-room, full service hotel and the adjacent approximately 43,346 SF convention center located in Norman, Oklahoma, within five miles of the University of Oklahoma’s main campus. The respective borrower has a fee simple ownership interest in the Embassy Suites Norman, OK Property. There are no significant planned renovations at the Embassy Suites Norman, OK Property.

B-45

HAMMONS HOTEL PORTFOLIO

Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX Property

The Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX Property opened in 2010 and consists of a 228-room, limited service hotel located in Allen, Texas, approximately 35 miles north of Dallas. The Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX Property is adjacent to the Allen Event Center and surrounded by retail and entertainment space. The respective borrower has a fee simple ownership interest in the Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX Property. Approximately $60,000 of underwritten revenue is attributed to third-party antenna leases at the Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX Property. There are planned renovations and capital improvements including new flooring and wall vinyl for common areas and guestrooms, totaling approximately $1,944,314 (for which the borrower has reserved $1,940,000) at the Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX Property.

Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property

The Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property opened in 2007 and consists of a 320-room, full service hotel located in Glendale, Arizona, a parking garage and the adjacent approximately 147,503 SF convention center and expo hall. The Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property is adjacent to the University of Phoenix Stadium (home of the NFL’s Arizona Cardinals), the Gila River Arena (home of the NHL’s Arizona Coyotes), and the Westgate Entertainment District (featuring 8,000,000 SF of retail and entertainment space). The respective borrower has a fee simple ownership interest in the hotel and a space lease interest in the convention center, expo hall and parking garage at the Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property. Approximately $6.3 million of underwritten revenue is attributed to operations from the space lease interest in the convention center, expo hall and parking garage. Approximately $12,000 of underwritten revenue is attributed to a third party antenna lease at the Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property. There are planned renovations and capital improvements in 2016 totaling approximately $650,000 and a full property renovation beginning in 2017 which will include new flooring for all common areas and guestrooms (for which the borrower has reserved $5,000,000) at the Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property.

Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL Property

The Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL Property opened in 2006 and consists of a 295-room, full service hotel and parking garage located in Huntsville, Alabama. The Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL Property is adjacent to, and is the only hotel with an interior skywalk connecting to the Von Braun Center, which is a 170,000 SF conference center that includes a 21,624 SF arena. The respective borrower has a leasehold ownership interest in the hotel and parking garage at the Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL Property. Approximately $285,000 of underwritten revenue is attributed to a lease with Ruth’s Chris Steakhouse, and approximately $11,500 of underwritten revenue is attributed to a lease with a gift shop at the Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL Property. There are no significant planned renovations at the Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL Property.

Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO Property

The Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO Property opened in 2007, was renovated in 2015 and consists of a 152-room, extended stay hotel located in Kansas City, Missouri. The Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO Property is within 5 miles of the Kansas City airport, and the respective borrower has a fee simple ownership interest in the hotel at the Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO Property. There are planned renovations and capital improvements, including guestroom updates and new flooring/wall vinyl for common areas, totaling approximately $976,188 (for which the borrower has reserved $950,000) at the Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO Property.

B-46

HAMMONS HOTEL PORTFOLIO

The following table presents certain information relating to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties:

Property	Cut-off Date Allocated Loan Amount	Rooms	Occupancy	Year Built	Appraised Value(1)	UW NCF	UW NCF per Room
Embassy Suites Concord, NC	$24,924,242	308	75.5%	2007	$89,300,000	$7,292,421	$23,677
Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN	20,235,247	283	78.0%	2008	72,500,000	5,706,173	20,163
Embassy Suites Norman, OK	15,674,641	283	74.3%	2008	54,600,000	3,945,402	13,941
Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX	12,443,344	228	77.9%	2010	43,344,314	3,170,771	13,907
Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ	11,974,976	320	63.8%	2007	55,200,000	3,046,468	9,520
Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL	10,103,668	295	78.2%	2006	36,200,000	2,640,907	8,952
Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO	4,643,882	152	80.9%	2007	16,176,188	1,131,392	7,443
Total / Wtd. Avg.	$100,000,000	1,869	74.9%		$367,320,502	$26,933,534	$14,411

(1) The Appraised Value represents the aggregate “as-is” appraised value of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties of $363,750,000 plus a $3,570,502 capital deduction related to franchise mandated capital improvements at the three Marriott properties for which the borrowers reserved $7,890,000 for the estimated mandatory and additional elective capital improvement costs. See “—Appraisals” below.

The following table presents certain information relating to the 2014 demand analysis with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio based on market segmentation, as provided in the appraisals for the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties:

Estimated 2014 Accommodated Room Night Demand ⁽¹⁾

Property	Commercial	Meeting and Group	Leisure	Government
Embassy Suites Concord, NC	70.0%	15.0%	15.0%	0.0%
Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN	45.0%	45.0%	10.0%	0.0%
Embassy Suites Norman, OK	35.0%	45.0%	15.0%	5.0%
Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX	40.0%	20.0%	40.0%	0.0%
Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ	10.0%	45.0%	45.0%	0.0%
Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL	40.0%	30.0%	10.0%	20.0%
Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO	20.0%	20.0%	20.0%	40.0%

(1) Source: Appraisal.

The following tables present certain information relating to historical occupancy, ADR and RevPAR at the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties:

Hammons Hotel Portfolio⁽¹⁾

	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	TTM June 2015
Occupancy(2)	63.9%	66.0%	68.6%	72.1%	73.9%	74.9%
ADR	$120.36	$121.21	$122.00	$122.95	$127.57	$131.52
RevPAR	$76.85	$79.98	$83.66	$88.59	$94.27	$97.59

(1) As provided by the borrower.

(2) Reflects average occupancy for the indicated period.

B-47

HAMMONS HOTEL PORTFOLIO

Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties⁽¹⁾

	2010			2011			2012
Property	Occ.(2)	ADR	RevPAR	Occ.(2)	ADR	RevPAR	Occ.(2)	ADR	RevPAR
Embassy Suites Concord, NC	70.4%	$131.65	$92.69	70.0%	$133.41	$93.41	72.3%	$137.23	$99.16
Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN	64.5%	$124.62	$80.39	64.0%	$127.03	$81.28	70.5%	$126.27	$88.97
Embassy Suites Norman, OK	59.4%	$114.39	$67.97	59.1%	$116.10	$68.63	67.6%	$112.29	$75.91
Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX	47.9%	$93.70	$44.93	66.5%	$  99.18	$66.00	72.0%	$104.98	$75.58
Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ	58.5%	$142.83	$83.52	55.7%	$147.42	$82.09	53.2%	$147.42	$78.36
Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL	77.0%	$113.04	$87.07	78.4%	$113.42	$88.94	77.4%	$113.47	$87.80
Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO	66.9%	$101.77	$68.09	71.0%	$99.39	$70.59	69.6%	$103.42	$71.97
Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties	63.90%	$120.36	$76.85	66.0%	$121.21	$79.98	68.6%	$122.00	$83.66

	2013			2014			TTM June 2015
Property	Occ.(2)	ADR	RevPAR	Occ.(2)	ADR	RevPAR	Occ.(2)	ADR	RevPAR
Embassy Suites Concord, NC	71.4%	$139.80	$99.87	74.2%	$146.44	$108.72	75.5%	$147.60	$111.43
Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN	76.2%	$129.23	$98.42	78.5%	$133.64	$104.94	78.0%	$134.42	$104.82
Embassy Suites Norman, OK	72.8%	$115.41	$84.00	74.1%	$118.12	$87.57	74.3%	$118.40	$87.99
Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX	75.0%	$111.78	$83.80	75.5%	$113.96	$86.00	77.9%	$115.61	$90.01
Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ	60.1%	$141.54	$85.00	59.8%	$149.77	$89.57	63.8%	$163.99	$104.66
Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL	74.2%	$113.48	$84.21	78.6%	$115.22	$90.56	78.2%	$114.52	$89.55
Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO	81.0%	$97.75	$79.19	82.3%	$105.81	$87.04	80.9%	$106.41	$86.03
Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties	72.1%	$122.95	$88.59	73.9%	$127.57	$94.27	74.9%	$131.52	$97.59

(1) As provided by the borrower.

(2) Reflects average occupancy for the indicated period.

The following table presents certain information relating to the historical penetration rates for the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties, as provided in the June 2015 travel research reports:

Historical Penetration Rates⁽¹⁾ 

	TTM June 2013			TTM June 2014			TTM June 2015
Property	Occupancy	ADR	RevPAR	Occupancy	ADR	RevPAR	Occupancy	ADR	RevPAR
Embassy Suites Concord, NC	106.7%	127.9%	136.5%	104.1%	130.7%	136.1%	102.0%	127.1%	129.7%
Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN	110.3%	132.7%	146.5%	115.3%	131.8%	152.1%	109.8%	132.5%	145.5%
Embassy Suites Norman, OK	101.8%	115.5%	117.6%	115.9%	112.4%	130.3%	124.7%	114.5%	142.8%
Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX	109.7%	115.3%	126.4%	100.4%	115.7%	116.2%	106.9%	111.5%	119.2%
Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ	94.0%	113.2%	106.4%	99.6%	109.9%	109.5%	102.0%	108.9%	111.1%
Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL	132.8%	116.5%	154.8%	132.5%	119.5%	158.4%	130.7%	117.8%	154.0%
Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO	110.9%	135.9%	150.7%	119.3%	133.2%	158.9%	107.9%	135.7%	146.5%

(1) Source: June 2015 travel research reports.

B-48

HAMMONS HOTEL PORTFOLIO

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow, on an aggregate basis and per room, at the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

	2013	2014	TTM 6/30/2015	Underwritten	Underwritten $ per Room
Rooms Revenue	$61,425,531	$64,130,610	$66,391,088	$64,811,132	$34,677
Food & Beverage Revenue(2)	33,448,924	35,898,278	38,903,418	37,037,054	19,817
Other Operating Revenue	2,853,230	2,749,355	2,835,248	2,633,773	1,409
Total Revenue	$97,727,685	$102,778,243	$108,129,754	$104,481,960	$55,903
Room Expense	$15,260,928	$15,727,948	$16,151,008	$15,835,594	$8,473
Food & Beverage Expense	16,262,019	17,024,443	17,715,009	16,864,241	9,023
Other Operating Expense	1,671,361	1,648,390	1,743,394	1,703,452	911
Total Departmental Expense	$33,194,308	$34,400,781	$35,609,411	$34,403,288	$18,407
Total Undistributed Expense	28,982,253	30,959,247	31,369,431	32,367,283	17,318
Total Fixed Expense(3)	5,876,809	6,659,044	6,885,581	6,598,578	3,531
Total Operating Expenses	$68,053,370	$72,019,072	$73,864,423	$73,369,148	$39,256
Net Operating Income	$29,674,315	$30,759,171	$34,265,331	$31,112,812	$16,647
FF&E	3,909,107	4,111,130	4,325,190	4,179,278	2,236
Net Cash Flow	$25,765,208	$26,648,041	$29,940,141	$26,933,534	$14,411

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) Underwritten food & beverage revenue includes approximately $6.3 million of revenue attributed to operations from the space lease interest in the convention center, expo hall and parking garage at the Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property.

(3) Underwritten total fixed expense includes space lease rent associated with the Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property ($1,419,741) and ground lease rent associated with the Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL Property ($224,595).

■ Appraisal. According to the appraisals, dated between June 8, 2015 and June 11, 2015, the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties had an aggregate “as-is” appraised value of $363,750,000 and a $3,570,502 capital deduction related to franchise mandated capital improvements at the three Marriott properties ($1,944,314 for the Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX Property, $650,000 for the Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ and $976,188 for the Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO Property). The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties have an aggregate “as stabilized” appraised value of $371,300,000, based on the “as stabilized” appraised values for the three Marriott properties as of dates ranging from June 2016 to June 2017 assuming stabilized occupancy and completion of the franchise mandated capital improvements at the three Marriott properties.

■ Environmental Matters. According to a Phase I environmental report, dated June 25, 2015, a landfill was historically present at the Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL Property. A prior Phase II environmental report, dated September 22, 2008, identified arsenic in soil samples at concentrations in excess of the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) preliminary screening levels for both commercial and residential use. The Phase I environmental consultant identified the landfill as a recognized environmental condition due to the elevated arsenic concentrations. Based on the non-volatile nature of the fill materials, the concrete and asphalt caps formed by the parking lot and building and the Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL Property’s commercial use, the Phase I environmental report recommended no further action.

According to the other Phase I environmental reports, each dated June 24, 2015 or June 25, 2015, there are no recognized environmental conditions or recommendations for further action at any of the other Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties.

B-49

HAMMONS HOTEL PORTFOLIO

■ Market Overview and Competition. The Hammons Hotel Portfolio consists of seven hotel properties with two different flags and four different brands. The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties are located within seven separate markets across seven states.

Embassy Suites Concord, NC Property 

The Embassy Suites Concord, NC Property is located in the Concord, North Carolina market near Charlotte, North Carolina. According to the appraisal, the Embassy Suites Concord, NC Property’s competitive set collectively had an average occupancy of 74.0%, ADR of $121.80, and RevPAR of $89.87 as of TTM April 2015.

The following table presents certain information relating to the primary competition for the Embassy Suites Concord, NC Property:

Competitive Set⁽¹⁾

Property	Number of Rooms	Year Built	TTM April 2015 Occupancy	TTM April 2015 ADR	TTM April 2015 RevPAR
Embassy Suites Concord, NC	308	2007	75%	$147.37	$109.94
Homewood Suites Charlotte North University Research Park	112	1990	73%	$95.00	$69.35
Residence Inn Charlotte University Research Park	91	1988	74%	$100.00	$74.00
Hilton Charlotte University Place	393	1986	71%	$135.00	$95.85
Courtyard Charlotte University Research Park	152	1990	71%	$110.00	$78.10
Holiday Inn Charlotte University Executive Park	174	1989	76%	$95.00	$72.20
Residence Inn Charlotte/Concord	130	2009	77%	$117.00	$90.09
Courtyard Charlotte/Concord	123	2009	77%	$125.00	$96.25
Hilton Garden Inn Charlotte/Concord	118	2010	76%	$110.00	$83.60

(1) Source: Appraisal.

Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN Property 

The Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN Property is located in the Murfreesboro, Tennessee submarket near Nashville, Tennessee. According to the appraisal, the Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN Property’s competitive set collectively had an average occupancy of 79.0%, ADR of $119.13, and RevPAR of $92.45 as of TTM April 2015.

The following table presents certain information relating to the primary competition for the Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN Property:

Competitive Set⁽¹⁾ 

Property	Number of Rooms	Year Built	TTM April 2015 Occupancy	TTM April 2015 ADR	TTM April 2015 RevPAR
Embassy Suites Murfreesboro, TN	283	2008	78%	$133.64	$104.29
Residence Inn by Marriott Murfreesboro	112	2015	80%	$130.00	NA
Hilton Garden Inn Murfreesboro	100	2014	70%	$135.00	$94.51
Hampton Inn & Suites Murfreesboro	101	2007	82%	$125.00	$102.50
Candlewood Suites Murfreesboro	85	2010	90%	$87.00	$78.30
Fairfield Inn-Murfreesboro	69	2005	83%	$102.00	$84.66
DoubleTree Hotel Murfreesboro	168	1988	78%	$112.00	$87.36
Comfort Suites Murfreesboro	82	2007	76%	$90.00	$68.40

(1) Source: Appraisal.

B-50

HAMMONS HOTEL PORTFOLIO

Embassy Suites Norman, OK Property 

The Embassy Suites Norman, OK Property is located in the Norman, Oklahoma submarket near Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. According to the appraisal, the Embassy Suites Norman, OK Property’s competitive set collectively had an average occupancy of 62.2%, ADR of $105.29, and RevPAR of $66.17 as of TTM April 2015.

The following table presents certain information relating to the primary competition for the Embassy Suites Norman, OK Property:

Competitive Set⁽¹⁾

Property	Number of Rooms	Year Built	TTM April 2015 Occupancy	TTM April 2015 ADR	TTM April 2015 RevPAR
Embassy Suites Norman, OK	283	2008	74%	$118.18	$87.19
Embassy Suites Oklahoma City	236	1982	65%	$108.00	$70.20
Sheraton Reed Conference Center Norman	151	2006	60%	$102.00	$61.20
Courtyard by Marriott Norman	113	2009	70%	$95.50	$66.85
Sheraton Oklahoma City	396	1976	59%	$131.50	$77.59
The Norman (formerly Holiday Inn) Norman	149	1984	40%	$72.00	$28.80
The Tower (formerly Marriott) Oklahoma City	354	1985	60%	$83.50	$50.10
Hilton Garden Inn Norman	121	2008	69%	$102.00	$70.38

(1) Source: Appraisal.

Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX Property 

The Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX Property is located in the Allen, Texas submarket near Dallas, Texas. According to the appraisal, the Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX Property’s competitive set collectively had an average occupancy of 72.1%, ADR of $109.86, and RevPAR of $79.60 as of TTM March 2015.  

The following table presents certain information relating to the primary competition for the Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX Property:

Competitive Set⁽¹⁾

Property	Number of Rooms	Year Built	TTM March 2015 Occupancy	TTM March 2015 ADR	TTM March 2015 RevPAR
Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX	228	2010	76%	$114.83	$87.80
Hilton Garden Inn Allen	150	2002	69%	$107.36	$73.86
Holiday Inn Express & Suites Allen	87	2006	70%	$103.23	$72.36
Hampton Inn & Suites Allen	103	2006	73%	$112.42	$82.52
Holiday Inn & Suites McKinney	99	2008	68%	$112.51	$76.84
La Quinta Inn & Suites Allen	90	2008	69%	$77.38	$53.08
Homewood Suites	114	2010	75%	$129.33	$97.00

(1) Source: Appraisal.

Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property 

The Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property is located in the Glendale, Arizona submarket, near Phoenix, Arizona. According to the appraisal, the Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property and its competitive set collectively had an average occupancy of 63.3%, ADR of $129.40, and RevPAR of $80.89 as of TTM December 2014.

B-51

HAMMONS HOTEL PORTFOLIO

The following table presents certain information relating to the primary competition for the Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property:

Competitive Set⁽¹⁾ 

Property	Number of Rooms	Year Built	TTM December  2014 Occupancy	TTM December 2014 ADR	TTM December 2014 RevPAR
Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ	320	2007	60%	$149.77	$89.32
Courtyard Phoenix West/Avondale-Phoenix	127	2008	64%	$110.00	$70.40
Comfort Suites University Phoenix Stadium-Glendale	100	2008	66%	$98.00	$64.68
Hampton Inn & Suites Phoenix Glendale-Westgate-Glendale	149	2007	70%	$95.00	$66.50
Residence Inn Glendale Sports & Ent. Dist.–Glendale	126	2007	68%	$120.00	$81.60
SpringHill Suites Glendale Sports & Ent. Dist.–Glendale	120	2007	65%	$90.00	$58.50
Wigwam Resort & Spa-Litchfield Park	331	1929	60%	$160.00	$96.00

(1) Source: Appraisal.

Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL Property  

The Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL Property is located in the Huntsville, Alabama metropolitan statistical area. According to the appraisal, the Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL Property’s competitive set collectively had an average occupancy of 65.9%, ADR of $106.94, and RevPAR of $71.21 as of TTM May 2015.

The following table presents certain information relating to the primary competition for the Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL Property:

Competitive Set⁽¹⁾

Property	Number of Rooms	Year Built	TTM May 2015 Occupancy	TTM May 2015 ADR	TTM May 2015 RevPAR
Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL	295	2006	79%	$114.17	$89.65
Marriott Huntsville	290	1986	61%	$112.00	$68.32
Hilton Garden Inn Huntsville	101	2005	67%	$101.00	$67.67
Holiday Inn Huntsville	200	1986	57%	$89.00	$50.73
Westin Huntsville	210	2008	70%	$125.00	$87.50
Four Points Huntsville	146	1996	55%	$85.00	$46.75

(1) Source: Appraisal.

Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO Property 

The Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO Property is located in the Kansas City, Missouri market. According to the appraisal, the Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO Property’s competitive set collectively had an average occupancy of 75.0%, ADR of $86.73, and RevPAR of $65.42 as of TTM April 2015.

The following table presents certain information relating to the primary competition for the Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO Property:

Competitive Set⁽¹⁾

Property	Number of Rooms	Year Built	TTM April 2015 Occupancy	TTM April 2015 ADR	TTM April 2015 RevPAR
Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO	152	2007	83%	$106.45	$88.32
Four Points Kansas City	200	1974	65%	$83.00	$53.95
Chase Suites Kansas City	112	1986	70%	$73.70	$51.59
Courtyard by Marriott Kansas City	149	1990	83%	$107.00	$88.81
Drury Inn & Suites Kansas City Airport Kansas City	122	1998	75%	$77.50	$58.13
Extended Stay America KCI Kansas City	89	1998	75%	$50.50	$37.88
Hyatt Place Kansas City	134	1999	80%	$105.00	$84.00
Holiday Inn KCI Kansas City	141	2006	75%	$74.00	$55.50
Candlewood Suites Kansas City	88	2010	75%	$74.00	$55.50

(1) Source: Appraisal.

■ The Borrowers. The borrowers are JQH-Allen Development, LLC, JQH-Concord Development, LLC, JQH-Glendale, AZ Development, LLC, Hammons of Huntsville, LLC, JQH-Kansas City Development, LLC, JQH-Murfreesboro Development, LLC, and JQH-Norman Development, LLC, each a single-purpose, single-asset entity. Legal counsel to the borrowers delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination. The Revocable Trust of John Q. Hammons, dated

B-52

HAMMONS HOTEL PORTFOLIO

December 28, 1989, as Amended and Restated (“JQH”), an indirect owner of the borrowers, is the non-recourse carveout guarantor under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination.

The borrowers are indirectly wholly owned by JQH. As of August 2015, JQH has a portfolio of nearly 70 hotels under management and ownership of 37 hotels. JQH is required to maintain a minimum net worth and liquidity of $100 million (excluding the equity in the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties) and $7 million, respectively, throughout the term of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan.

As security for a line of credit, the JQH Trust has pledged its ownership interest in John Q. Hammons Hotels Development, LLC, which is the parent entity of 4 of the borrowers as well as 2 other affiliates who own hotel properties that are not part of the collateral for the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan. The lender under that credit line has alleged a breach of representations and warranties related to certain net worth requirements of the JQH Trust, the guarantor on the line of credit. Additionally, JD Holdings, LLC and Atrium Hotels, L.P., 2 companies controlled by Jonathan Eilian, have filed suit against the borrowers, JQH Trust and certain other affiliates regarding rights under the partnership agreement for Atrium Hotels, L.P. and a certain right of first refusal agreement. These agreements and the related litigations may result in the marketing of the properties for sale, and JD Holdings, LLC or an affiliate would then be entitled to exercise certain rights of first refusal with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties. See “—Release of Collateral” below, “Description of the Mortgage Pool—Litigation Considerations” in the Prospectus Supplement and the related exceptions to the representations and warranties set forth on Annex E-2 to the Prospectus Supplement.

■ Escrows. On the origination date, the borrowers funded (i) a tax reserve in the amount of $3,172,482, (ii) a space rent reserve in the amount of $672,974 for eight months of the space rent payment associated with the Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property and two months of the fixed ground rent payment associated with the Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL Property ground lease, and (iii) property improvement plan reserves to maintain the three Marriott properties in accordance with the applicable brand standards in the amount of $5,000,000 for the Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property, $1,940,000 for the Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX Property, and $950,000 for the Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO Property related to capital expenditures and any future brand standard improvements.

On each due date, the borrowers will be required to fund (i) a tax, ground rent and insurance reserve in an amount equal to one-twelfth of the amount that the lender reasonably estimates will be necessary to pay taxes, ground rent and insurance premiums over the then succeeding 12-month period (but excluding any payments in respect of taxes or insurance premiums to be made directly by one or more tenants or a ground lessor); provided, however, that reserve deposits for insurance premiums are not required if the borrowers are maintaining a blanket policy in accordance with the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan documents and there is no continuing event of default and (ii) a FF&E reserve in the amount of: (a) on each due date from October 2015 through and including September 2016, $360,433, (b) beginning on the due date in October 2016, the greater of (1) the monthly amount required to be reserved for each Hammons Hotel Portfolio Property pursuant to the applicable franchise agreement for the replacement of furniture, fixtures and equipment and (2) one-twelfth of 4% of the operating income for each Hammons Hotel Portfolio Property (or, in the case of the Renaissance by Marriott Glendale, AZ Property beginning on the due date in October 2017, one-twelfth of 5% of the operating income) for the previous 12-month period (as determined on August 31 of each year).

In addition, on each due date during the continuance of a Hammons Hotel Portfolio Trigger Period, the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan documents require an excess cash reserve or a property improvement plan reserve as discussed under “—Lockbox and Cash Management” below.

A “Hammons Hotel Portfolio Trigger Period” means any period (i) commencing upon the net operating income (as calculated under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan documents) for the trailing 12-month period (as of the last day of any fiscal quarter) falling below the product of (x) $29,940,142 minus the net operating income as of the origination date of any Hammons Hotel Portfolio Property that has been released from the lien of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan documents, times (y) 85%, and ending at the conclusion of the second consecutive fiscal quarter for which the net operating income is greater than or equal to such threshold; (ii) commencing upon the borrowers’ failure to deliver monthly, quarterly or annual financial reports and ending when such reports are

B-53

HAMMONS HOTEL PORTFOLIO

delivered and indicate that no other Hammons Hotel Portfolio Trigger Period is ongoing; (iii) during the continuance of a Hammons Hotel Portfolio Franchise Trigger Period; and (iv) commencing when the borrower sponsor fails to maintain a net worth in excess of $100,000,000 excluding any assets attributable to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties or liquid assets in excess of $7,000,000 (excluding any funds that are held by the lender in one or more accounts and sub-accounts established pursuant to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan documents) and ending when such net worth and liquid assets thresholds are satisfied.

A “Hammons Hotel Portfolio Franchise Trigger Period” means any period (a) commencing upon the occurrence of either (i) the failure to deliver, among other things, a replacement franchise agreement or management agreement (or an extension or written commitment by the applicable franchisor of an existing franchise agreement) with a term that extends at least 3 years beyond the maturity date of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination at least 18 months prior to the expiration date of such franchise agreement or (ii) the implementation of a property improvement plan as a condition to entering a replacement franchise agreement or the extension of the existing franchise agreement (other than the capital expenditures related to the upfront reserves for the Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property, the Courtyard by Marriott Dallas/Allen, TX Property and the Residence Inn by Marriott Kansas City, MO Property described under “—Escrows” above) and (b) ending at the date upon which (x) the borrowers deliver, among other things, a replacement franchise agreement or management agreement (or an extension or written commitment by the applicable franchisor of an existing franchise agreement) with a term that extends at least 3 years beyond the maturity date of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination, and (y) if a property improvement plan is required in connection with such replacement (or extension or written commitment), the earlier to occur of (A) such property improvement plan being completed to the satisfaction of the applicable franchisor, (B) the balance in the property improvement plan reserve account being greater than or equal to 100% of the estimated cost to complete such property improvement plan, or (C) the delivery to the lender of a letter of credit in an amount equal to 100% of the estimated cost to complete such property improvement plan.

■ Lockbox and Cash Management. The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination is structured with a hard lockbox and springing cash management. The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan documents require the borrowers to direct credit card companies to remit all credit card receivables directly to one or more lender-controlled lockbox accounts, and require that all cash revenues relating to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties and all other money received by the borrowers or the property manager with respect to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties be deposited into such lockbox account or a lender-controlled cash management account within three business days following receipt. On each business day that no Hammons Hotel Portfolio Trigger Period or event of default under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination is continuing, all funds in the lockbox accounts are required to be swept into one or more borrower-controlled operating accounts. On each business day during the continuance of a Hammons Hotel Portfolio Trigger Period or an event of default, all funds in the lockbox accounts are required to be swept into a lender-controlled cash management account and, at lender’s discretion during an event of default under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination, (a) be used to pay debt service, required reserves and operating expenses, and (b) for all remaining amounts be reserved in (i) an excess cash flow reserve account during the continuance of a Hammons Hotel Portfolio Trigger Period (other than as described in clause (ii) below) or event of default or (ii) a property improvement plan reserve account during the continuance of a Hammons Hotel Portfolio Trigger Period caused by a Hammons Hotel Portfolio Franchise Trigger Period (up to a cap of 100% of the estimated cost to complete the property improvement plan, less amounts then on deposit).

During the continuance of an event of default under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination, the lender may apply all funds on deposit in any of the accounts constituting collateral for the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination to amounts payable under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan documents and/or toward the payment of expenses of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties, in such order of priority as the lender may determine.

■ Property Management. The Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties are managed by John Q. Hammons Hotels Management, LLC pursuant to a management agreement. Under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan documents, the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties are required to remain managed by (i) John Q. Hammons Hotels Management, LLC, (ii) Winegardner & Hammons, Inc. and John Q. Hammons Accounting Services, LLC for

B-54

HAMMONS HOTEL PORTFOLIO

certain financial and accounting services for the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties, while John Q. Hammons Hotels Management, LLC is the property manager for any Hammons Hotel Portfolio Property, (iii) any management company that is affiliated with the franchisor or licensor of a franchise, (iv) any reputable and experienced professional hotel management company meeting certain experience requirements under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan documents that is approved by the applicable franchisor, or (v) any other management company approved by the lender and with respect to which Rating Agency Confirmation has been received. The lender has the right to replace, or require the borrowers to replace, the property manager with a property manager selected by the lender (i) during the continuance of an event of default under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination, (ii) following any foreclosure, conveyance in lieu of foreclosure or other similar transaction, (iii) during the continuance of a material default by the property manager under the management agreement (after the expiration of any applicable notice and/or cure periods), (iv) if the property manager files for or is the subject of a petition in bankruptcy or (v) if a trustee or receiver is appointed for the property manager’s assets or the property manager makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors or is adjudicated insolvent.

■ Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.

■ Ground Leases and Space Lease. The borrower for the Embassy Suites Concord, NC Property is a tenant under a ground lease underlying the convention center at the Embassy Suites Concord, NC Property (the “Embassy Suites Concord Ground Lease”). The Embassy Suites Concord Ground Lease has an expiration date of December 9, 2059 (with three extension options through December 9, 2089). No ground rent is payable prior to November 21, 2022, at which time an annual ground lease payment of 0.25% of adjusted room sales for the previous calendar year (estimated to be approximately $27,188) will be due. The borrower for the Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property is a tenant under a space lease for the convention center, expo hall and parking garage at the Renaissance by Marriott Phoenix/Glendale, AZ Property. The space lease has an expiration date of January 29, 2063 (with two extension options through January 29, 2083). The annual lease payment under the space lease is currently $1,419,741, calculated based on a fixed component of $985,725 plus a variable component based on the trailing 12-month revenue generated from the parking garage and expo hall. The borrower for the Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL Property is a tenant under a ground lease for the hotel and parking garage at the Embassy Suites Huntsville, AL Property (the “Embassy Suites Huntsville Ground Lease”). The Embassy Suites Huntsville Ground Lease has a term through February 15, 2104 and an annual ground lease payment of $224,595.

■ Release of Collateral. Provided no monetary default or event of default under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination is then continuing, at any time prior to the first due date following the earlier to occur of (a) the third anniversary of the origination date of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination and (b) the second anniversary of the closing date of the securitization into which the last piece of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination is deposited, the borrowers may obtain the release of one or more of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties from the lien of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan documents in connection with a bona fide third-party sale of such property or properties, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan documents, including among others: (i) prepayment in an amount equal to 115% of the allocated loan amount for each Hammons Hotel Portfolio Property being released and a prepayment fee equal to the greater of (a) a yield maintenance premium calculated based on the excess, if any, of the present values of the remaining scheduled principal and interest payments, over the outstanding principal balance of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination, and (b) 1% of the principal amount being prepaid; (ii) after giving effect to the release, the debt service coverage ratio (as calculated under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan documents) for the remaining Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties for the 12-month period preceding the end of the most recent fiscal quarter is no less than the greater of (a) 1.86x and (b) the debt service coverage ratio immediately prior to the release; (iii) delivery of Rating Agency Confirmation with respect to such partial release; and (iv) the satisfaction of certain REMIC requirements.

Provided no event of default under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination is then continuing, at any time on or after the first due date following the earlier to occur of (a) the third anniversary of the origination date of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination and (b) the second anniversary of the closing date of the securitization into which the last piece of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination is deposited, the

B-55

HAMMONS HOTEL PORTFOLIO

borrowers may obtain the release of one or more of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties from the lien of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan documents, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan documents, including among others: (i) delivery of defeasance collateral in an amount equal to the lesser of (A) 115% of the allocated loan amount for each Hammons Hotel Portfolio Property being released and (B) the outstanding principal balance of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan Combination, (ii) after giving effect to the release, the debt service coverage ratio (as calculated under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan documents) for the remaining Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties for the 12-month period preceding the end of the most recent fiscal quarter is no less than the greater of (a) 1.86x and (b) the debt service coverage ratio immediately prior to the release; (iii) delivery of Rating Agency Confirmation with respect to such defeasance; and (iv) the satisfaction of certain REMIC requirements. 

■ Terrorism Insurance. So long as TRIPRA or a similar or subsequent statute is in effect, the borrowers are required to maintain terrorism insurance for foreign and domestic acts (as those terms are defined in TRIPRA or a similar or subsequent statute) in an amount equal to the full replacement cost of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties (plus 18 months of rental loss and/or business interruption coverage plus an additional period of indemnity covering the 12 months following restoration). If TRIPRA or a similar or subsequent statute is not in effect, then provided that terrorism insurance is commercially available, the borrowers are required to carry terrorism insurance throughout the term of the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan as described in the preceding sentence, but in that event the borrowers are not required to spend more than two times the amount of the insurance premium that is payable at that time in respect of the property and business interruption/rental loss insurance required under the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Loan documents (without giving effect to the cost of terrorism and earthquake components of such property and business interruption/rental loss insurance), and if the cost of terrorism insurance exceeds such amount, then the borrowers are required to purchase the maximum amount of terrorism insurance available with funds equal to such amount. In either such case, terrorism insurance may not have a deductible in excess of $50,000. The required terrorism insurance may be included in a blanket policy, provided that the borrowers provide evidence satisfactory to the lender that the insurance premiums for the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties are separately allocated to the Hammons Hotel Portfolio Properties and that the policy will provide the same protection as a separate policy. See “Risk Factors—Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties” in the Prospectus Supplement.

B-56

 (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

B-57

THE DECORATION & DESIGN BUILDING

 

B-58

THE DECORATION & DESIGN BUILDING

 

B-59

THE DECORATION & DESIGN BUILDING

 

B-60

THE DECORATION & DESIGN BUILDING

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	1	Loan Seller		CGMRC
Location (City/State)	New York, New York	Cut-off Date Principal Balance(2)		$65,000,000
Property Type	Office	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per SF(1)		$280.37
Size (SF)	588,512	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance		6.8%
Total Occupancy as of 6/3/2015	94.8%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans		None
Owned Occupancy as of 6/3/2015	94.8%	Type of Security		Leasehold
Year Built / Latest Renovation	1963 / 2001	Mortgage Rate		4.1100%
Appraised Value	$400,000,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)		129
		Original Amortization Term (Months)		360
		Original Interest Only Term (Months)	69
Underwritten Revenues	$48,377,193	Escrows
Underwritten Expenses	$25,586,971		Upfront	Monthly
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$22,790,222	Taxes	$2,128,973	$1,064,487
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$22,075,196	Insurance	$0	$0
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1)	41.3%	Replacement Reserve	$0	$10,543
Maturity Date LTV Ratio(1)	37.5%	TI/LC (3)	$0	$0
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF(1)	2.38x / 2.30x	Ground Lease	$318,750	$318,750
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF(1)	13.8% / 13.4%	Other (4)	$165,850	$0

Sources and Uses
Sources	$	%	Uses	$	%
Loan Combination Amount	$165,000,000	99.9%	Loan Payoff	$127,315,231	77.1	%
Other Sources	115,000	0.1	Principal Equity Distribution	31,702,659	19.2
			Closing Costs	3,483,536	2.1
			Reserves	2,613,573	1.6
Total Sources	$165,115,000	100.0%	Total Uses	$165,115,000	100.0	%

(1)

Calculated based on the outstanding principal balance of The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination (as defined below).

(2)

The Decoration & Design Building Loan, which has a Cut-off Date Principal Balance of $65,000,000 and is evidenced by the non-controlling note A-2, is part of the $165,000,000 Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination, evidenced by two pari passu notes. The pari passu companion loan, which has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $100,000,000 and is evidenced by the controlling note A-1, was contributed to the Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-P1, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-P1 (“CGCMT 2015-P1”) securitization transaction.

(3)	The borrower is required to deposit $98,085 per month during a TI/LC Trigger Period. See “—Escrows” below.
(4)	Other upfront reserves represent deferred maintenance of $165,850 for façade repairs. See “—Escrows” below.

■ The Mortgage Loan. The mortgage loan (“The Decoration & Design Building Loan”) is part of a loan combination (“The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination”) evidenced by two pari passu notes that are together secured by a first mortgage encumbering the borrower’s leasehold interest in an office building located in New York City (“The Decoration & Design Building Property”). The Decoration & Design Building Loan, which is evidenced by note A-2 and represents the non-controlling interest in The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination, had an original principal balance of $65,000,000, has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $65,000,000 and represents approximately 6.8% of the Initial Pool Balance. The related companion loan (“The Decoration & Design Building Companion Loan”), which is evidenced by note A-1 and represents the controlling interest in The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination, was contributed to the CGCMT 2015-P1 securitization transaction, had an original principal balance of $100,000,000 and has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $100,000,000. The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination was originated by Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. on July 15, 2015. The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination had an original principal balance of $165,000,000, has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $165,000,000 and accrues interest at an interest rate of 4.1100% per annum. The proceeds of The Decoration & Design Building Loan Combination were used to refinance existing debt on The Decoration & Design Building Property, pay origination costs, fund reserves, and return equity to The Decoration & Design Building borrower sponsor.

The Decoration & Design Building Loan had an initial term of 129 months and has a remaining term as of the Cut-off Date of 128 months. The Decoration & Design Building Loan requires interest only payments on each due date through and including the due date occurring in May 2021 and thereafter requires payments of interest and principal based on a 30-year amortization schedule. The scheduled maturity date of The Decoration & Design Building Loan is the due date in May 2026. Voluntary prepayment of The Decoration & Design Building Loan without payment of any prepayment premium is permitted on or after the due date in February 2026. Provided no event of default under The Decoration & Design Building Loan documents has occurred and is continuing, at any time prior to the maturity date and after the second anniversary of the securitization Closing Date, The Decoration

B-61

THE DECORATION & DESIGN BUILDING

& Design Building Loan may be defeased with certain direct, non-callable obligations of the United States of America or other obligations which are “government securities” permitted under The Decoration & Design Building Loan documents.

■ The Mortgaged Property. The Decoration & Design Building Property is an 18-story, multi-tenant office building containing 588,512 SF of net rentable area. The Decoration & Design Building Property was constructed in 1963 on a 35,037 SF parcel of land and was renovated in 2001. The Decoration & Design Building Property is currently operated as a wholesale design center and showroom building and caters to professionals in the residential decorating and interior design industry. The showroom tenants within the building sell items such as furniture, fabrics, antiques, art and craftwork, flooring, wall coverings, lighting and other decorative and design items. The Decoration & Design Building Property was 94.8% occupied as of June 3, 2015.

The following table presents certain information relating to the major tenants at The Decoration & Design Building Property:

Ten Largest Tenants Based on Underwritten Base Rent

Tenant Name	Credit Rating (Fitch/MIS/S&P)	Tenant GLA	% of GLA		UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent		UW Base Rent $ per SF	Lease Expiration	Renewal / Extension Options
Stark	NR/NR/NR	37,174	6.3	%	$2,550,954	6.1	%	$68.62	11/30/2024	NA
F.Schumacher & Co	NR/NR/NR	22,745	3.9		1,693,482	4.0		74.46	6/30/2017	NA
Kravet Fabrics Inc(1)	NR/NR/NR	23,766	4.0		1,574,492	3.7		66.25	Various	NA
Donghia, Inc.	NR/NR/NR	18,450	3.1		1,530,850	3.6		82.97	9/30/2021	NA
Euromarket - Crate and Barrel	NR/NR/NR	13,265	2.3		1,364,999	3.2		102.90	1/31/2027	NA
Cowtan and Tout, Inc	NR/NR/NR	12,346	2.1		1,170,218	2.8		94.79	4/30/2019	NA
Holly Hunt Enterprises, Inc	NR/NR/NR	19,056	3.2		1,110,532	2.6		58.28	3/31/2017	NA
B&F NYF Realty LLC	NR/NR/NR	12,632	2.1		1,012,136	2.4		80.12	7/31/2023	NA
Zimmer & Rhode LTD	NR/NR/NR	11,372	1.9		988,702	2.4		86.94	2/28/2019	NA
The Robert Allen Group	NR/NR/NR	7,630	1.3		834,543	2.0		109.38	5/31/2025	NA
Ten Largest Tenants		178,436	30.3	%	$13,830,908	32.9	%	$77.51
Remaining Tenants		379,627	64.5		28,228,996	67.1		74.36
Vacant		30,449	5.2		0	0.0		0.00
Total / Wtd. Avg. All Tenants		588,512	100.0	%	$42,059,904	100.0	%	$75.37

(1) Kravet Fabrics Inc occupies space under two leases: (i) 14,337 SF that expired on May 31, 2015 and (ii) 9,429 SF with a lease expiration date of October 31, 2023. Kravet Fabrics Inc is currently negotiating a lease renewal for the 14,337 SF space and continues to pay rent on a month-to-month basis. Kravet Fabrics Inc has been a tenant at The Decoration & Design Building Property since 2003.

The following table presents the lease rollover schedule at The Decoration & Design Building Property, based on initial lease expiration dates:

Lease Expiration Schedule⁽¹⁾

Year Ending December 31,	Expiring Owned GLA	% of Owned  GLA		Cumulative % of Owned GLA		UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent		UW Base Rent $ per SF	# of Expiring Tenants
MTM(2)	15,189	2.6	%	2.6	%	$1,082,330	2.6	%	$71.26	12
2015	9,643	1.6		4.2	%	971,580	2.3		100.75	15
2016	51,095	8.7		12.9	%	4,466,115	10.6		87.41	22
2017	90,466	15.4		28.3	%	6,720,115	16.0		74.28	18
2018	35,101	6.0		34.2	%	2,805,507	6.7		79.93	19
2019	78,045	13.3		47.5	%	6,581,782	15.6		84.33	24
2020	32,005	5.4		52.9	%	2,863,625	6.8		89.47	13
2021	48,592	8.3		61.2	%	3,810,878	9.1		78.43	9
2022	17,738	3.0		64.2	%	1,335,934	3.2		75.31	4
2023	42,735	7.3		71.5	%	3,362,100	8.0		78.67	5
2024	73,756	12.5		84.0	%	5,151,109	12.2		69.84	9
2025	12,433	2.1		86.1	%	1,189,831	2.8		95.70	4
2026 & Thereafter	51,265	8.7		94.8	%	1,718,999	4.1		33.53	3
Vacant	30,449	5.2		100.0	%	0	0.0		0.00	0
Total / Wtd. Avg.	588,512	100.0	%			$42,059,904	100.0	%	$75.37	157

(1) Calculated based on approximate square footage occupied by each owned tenant.

(2) Month-to-month space consists of mainly showcase space leased by existing office tenants and Kravet Fabrics Inc, which is currently negotiating a lease renewal for the 14,337 SF space and continues to pay rent on a month to month basis. Kravet Fabrics Inc has been a tenant at The Decoration & Design Building Property since 2003.

B-62

THE DECORATION & DESIGN BUILDING

The following table presents certain information relating to historical leasing at The Decoration & Design Building Property:

Historical Leased %⁽¹⁾

	2011	2012	2013	2014	As of 6/3/2015
Owned Space	94.9%	92.3%	94.4%	94.5%	94.8%

(1) As provided by the borrower and reflecting average occupancy for the specified year unless otherwise indicated.

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at The Decoration & Design Building Property:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

	2012	2013	2014	TTM 2/28/2015	Underwritten	Underwritten $ per SF
Base Rent	$35,510,100	$36,249,751	$38,820,860	39,243,906	$41,206,030	$70.02
Contractual Rent Steps(2)	0	0	0	0	853,874	1.45
Gross Up Vacancy	0	0	0	0	2,527,688	4.30
Total Rent	$35,510,100	$36,249,751	$38,820,860	$39,243,906	$44,587,592	$75.76
Total Reimbursables	4,709,959	5,939,812	6,147,751	6,102,525	5,535,962	9.41
Other Income(3)	267,150	839,500	781,327	887,958	781,327	1.33
Percentage Rent	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
Vacancy & Credit Loss	0	0	0	0	(2,527,688)	(4.30)
Effective Gross Income	$40,487,209	$43,029,063	$45,749,938	$46,234,389	$48,377,193	$82.20
Real Estate Taxes	$9,499,111	$10,680,279	$11,760,835	$11,737,139	$12,188,698	$20.71
Insurance	78,417	73,241	84,146	84,964	84,158	0.14
Management Fee	1,000,000	1,000,000	1,000,000	1,000,000	1,000,000	1.70
Ground Rent(4)	3,825,284	3,825,653	3,825,282	3,825,403	5,820,000	9.89
Other Operating Expenses	6,280,549	6,184,149	6,643,551	6,461,398	6,494,115	11.03
Total Operating Expenses	$20,683,362	$21,763,322	$23,313,814	$23,108,904	$25,586,971	$43.48
Net Operating Income	$19,803,847	$21,265,741	$22,436,124	$23,125,485	$22,790,222	$38.73
TI/LC	0	0	0	0	588,506	1.00
Replacement Reserves	0	0	0	0	126,520	0.21
Net Cash Flow	$19,803,847	$21,265,741	$22,436,124	$23,125,485	$22,075,196	$37.51

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, lease cancellation income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) Contractual rent steps are underwritten based upon the actual scheduled rent increases through June 1, 2016.

(3) Other income includes other services income, design directory income, miscellaneous license agreements, and miscellaneous income.

(4) Ground rent was underwritten based on the average ground rent payment for the 11-year period following the origination date of The Decoration & Design Building Loan, including an estimated ground rent reset payment commencing January 2024. The estimated ground rent reset payment for purposes of determining underwritten ground rent is based on the appraiser’s concluded fee simple interest land value of $230,000,000 as of April 1, 2015; however, the actual ground rent reset payment will be based on the greater of (i) the rent payable at the end of the current lease term ending immediately prior to the ground rent reset date commencing in January 2024, and (ii) 6% of the appraised unencumbered land value as of the date one year prior to the commencement of the renewal term in January 2024, assuming that a building can be erected on the land containing the greater of 375,000 square feet or such square footage as may be then permitted under zoning laws. See “—Ground Lease” below.

■ Appraisal. According to the appraisal, The Decoration & Design Building Property had an “as-is” appraised value of $400,000,000 as of April 1, 2015.

■ Environmental Matters. Based on the Phase I environmental report dated April 2, 2015, there were no recommendations for further action for The Decoration & Design Building Property other than the continuation of an operations and maintenance plan for asbestos, which was in place at origination of The Decoration & Design Building Loan.

B-63

THE DECORATION & DESIGN BUILDING

■ Market Overview and Competition. The Decoration & Design Building Property is located at the corner of Third Avenue and East 58^th Street in New York City within the Midtown Office Market. The Midtown Office Market is the largest office market in Manhattan containing 241.3 million SF within its 10 major submarkets. According to a third-party report, the Midtown Office Market had a 4^th quarter 2014 overall vacancy rate of 9.8% with a direct vacancy rate of 8.1% and overall absorption of 3.85 million SF. The overall weighted average asking rent was $75.14 per SF, which saw an increase of 1.9% from the 3^rd quarter 2014 rent of $73.72 per SF.

The immediate vicinity of The Decoration & Design Building Property is known as the Third Avenue Corridor which begins in the Grand Central District just below 42^nd Street and runs through the Plaza District to 59th Street to the north. According to the appraisal, the Third Avenue District consists of a series of 31 primary office buildings (excluding The Decoration & Design Building Property) that were constructed in the late 1950s and 1960s.

The appraiser identified 37 office buildings located along the Third Avenue Corridor, 42nd Street, and Lexington Avenue that are considered competitive with The Decoration & Design Building Property for a total of 17.04 million SF of space. The overall occupancy rate of the buildings is 88.6% for direct space, compared to 91.2% for Class A direct space in Midtown as a whole. Of the 37 buildings, 8 are considered directly competitive with The Decoration & Design Building Property for a total of 4.67 million SF of space. The total average occupancy of the 8 buildings is 93.1% with direct average occupancy at 94.1%. Direct asking rents for the 8 buildings ranges from $58.00/SF to $81.00/SF.

The Decoration & Design Building Property is unique when compared to other buildings in the Third Avenue Corridor because it is a wholesale design center and showroom building. The tenants of The Decoration & Design Building Property cater to professionals in the residential decorating and interior design industry, and the building has a mix of tenants selling furniture, fabrics, antiques, art, flooring, wall coverings, lighting, and other decorative items. Only a few showroom buildings similar to The Decoration & Design Building Property are located in Manhattan.

The following table presents certain information relating to certain office lease comparables in showroom buildings provided in the appraisal for The Decoration & Design Building Property:

Office Lease Comparables⁽¹⁾

	The Decoration & Design Building Property	The New York Design Center	The Architects and Designers Building	The New York Merchandise Mart
Address	979 Third Avenue	200 Lexington Avenue	150 East 58th Street	41 Madison
Year Built / Renovated	1963 / 2001	1926 / NAP	1969  / 1999	1973 / NAP
Total GLA	588,512	512,000	447,549	532,525
Occupancy %	95%	100%	99%	100%
Direct Asking Rent	N/A	N/A	$80.00-90.00 PSF	N/A

(1) Source: Appraisal.

■ The Borrower. The borrower is D&D Building Company LLC, a single-purpose, single-asset New York limited liability company. Legal counsel to the borrower delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of The Decoration & Design Building Loan. The non-recourse carveout guarantor under The Decoration & Design Building Loan is Charles S. Cohen.

Charles S. Cohen is the President and CEO of Cohen Brothers Realty Corporation (“CBRC”). CBRC is a private real estate development and management firm that has been in business for over 50 years. CBRC is headquartered in New York City, and has commercial properties in New York, Houston, South Florida, and Southern California. CBRC owns more than 12 million SF of commercial real estate, with a special niche in design centers.

B-64

THE DECORATION & DESIGN BUILDING

■ Escrows. In connection with the origination of The Decoration & Design Building Loan, the borrower funded a reserve of (i) $2,128,973 for real estate taxes, (ii) $165,850 for deferred maintenance and (iii) $318,750 for ground lease payments.

On each due date, the borrower is required to pay to the lender (a) one-twelfth of the taxes that the lender estimates will be payable during the next ensuing twelve months, and (b) if the liability or casualty policy maintained by the borrower covering The Decoration & Design Building Property does not constitute an approved blanket or umbrella policy pursuant to terms and conditions in The Decoration & Design Building Loan documents or the lender requires the borrower to obtain a separate policy, one-twelfth of the insurance premiums that the lender estimates will be payable for the renewal of the coverage afforded by the insurance policies. In addition, the borrower is required to escrow: (i) on each monthly due date and prior to the maturity date of The Decoration & Design Building Loan, $10,543 for replacement reserves; (ii) on each monthly due date prior to the maturity date of The Decoration & Design Building Loan, an amount equal to one-twelfth of the annual amount due for ground lease payments (currently $318,750); and (iii) on each monthly due date during a TI/LC Trigger Period (as defined below), $98,085 for tenant improvements and leasing commissions. During a Decoration & Design Building Trigger Period (as defined below), the borrower is required to deposit into an excess cash flow account with the lender or servicer all excess cash flow generated at The Decoration & Design Building Property, which funds are disbursed to the borrower at the end of such Decoration & Design Building Trigger Period, provided that no event of default is continuing.

A “TI/LC Trigger Period” means a period during which (A) the debt service coverage ratio is less than 1.40x; and (B) less than 85% of the leasable area of The Decoration & Design Building Property is occupied by tenants that are paying full unabated rent in accordance with the terms of each such tenant’s applicable leases.

■ Lockbox and Cash Management. The Decoration & Design Building Loan is structured with a hard lockbox which is already in place and springing cash management. Pursuant to The Decoration & Design Building Loan documents, the borrower is required to direct all tenants to deposit all rents into the lockbox account during the term of The Decoration & Design Building Loan. So long as a Decoration & Design Building Trigger Period is not in effect, all funds in the lockbox account will be remitted on each business day to the borrower’s operating account. Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of any Decoration & Design Building Trigger Period, the lender, on the borrower’s behalf, will establish an eligible cash management account with the lender or the servicer and all funds in the lockbox account will be required to be transferred on each business day to the cash management account. All funds on deposit in the cash management account are required to be applied to pay debt service and operating expenses of The Decoration & Design Building Property and to fund required reserves in accordance with The Decoration & Design Building Loan documents. All amounts remaining after such application are required to be held by the lender as additional collateral for The Decoration & Design Building Loan until no Decoration & Design Building Trigger Period exists, at which time the funds are disbursed to the borrower.

A “Decoration & Design Building Trigger Period” means a period (A) commencing upon the earliest of (i) the occurrence and continuance of an event of default and (ii) the debt service coverage ratio being less than 1.10x and (B) expiring upon (x) with regard to any Decoration & Design Building Trigger Period commenced in connection with clause (i) above, the cure of such event of default and (y) with regard to any Decoration & Design Building Trigger Period commenced in connection with clause (ii) above, the debt service coverage ratio being equal to or greater than 1.15x for two (2) consecutive calendar quarters.

■ Property Management. The Decoration & Design Building Property is currently managed by Cohen Brothers Realty Corporation, an affiliate of the borrower, pursuant to a management agreement. Under The Decoration & Design Building Loan documents, the borrower may terminate and replace the property manager so long as (i) no event of default has occurred under The Decoration & Design Building Loan documents, (ii) the lender receives at least 30 days’ prior written notice, (iii) the replacement would not cause, directly or indirectly, any termination right, right of first refusal, first offer or any other similar right to be exercisable, any termination fees to be due, or a material adverse effect to occur under the ground lease (described in “—Ground Lease” below) in place at The Decoration & Design Building Property, without the lender’s prior written consent and (iv) the applicable

B-65

THE DECORATION & DESIGN BUILDING

replacement property manager and management agreement are approved by the lender in writing (which approval may be conditioned upon the lender’s receipt of a Rating Agency Confirmation). The lender has the right to terminate the management agreement and replace any manager or require the borrower to terminate the management agreement and replace any manager if: (i) the manager becomes insolvent or a debtor in a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding (which, if involuntary, is not dismissed within ninety days); (ii) a Decoration & Design Building Trigger Period is continuing; (iii) the manager has engaged in gross negligence, fraud, willful misconduct or misappropriation of funds; or (iv) a default by the manager beyond all applicable notice and cure periods has occurred under the management agreement.

■ Mezzanine or Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.

■ Ground Lease. The Decoration & Design Building Property consists of the borrower’s interest in a ground lease between the borrower, as ground lessee, and 979 Third Avenue Associates LLC, as ground lessor. The current term of the ground lease expires on December 31, 2023. The ground lease has two extension options, one for 25 years (to 2048) and a subsequent one for 15 years (to 2063). The Decoration & Design Building Loan documents require the borrower to exercise the first renewal option not later than 60 days after the option first becomes available for exercise on December 31, 2019, failing which the lender may deliver to the ground lessor a pre-executed notice of exercise of the renewal option that is held by the lender in escrow. The ground lease also includes a provision permitting the lender to exercise the renewal option within 30 days after the borrower’s period to exercise the option has expired. The current annual rent due under the ground lease is $3,825,000 through December 2023. The annual ground rent payable under the ground lease for the 25-year renewal term commencing in 2024 will be the greater of (i) 100% of prior year payment, or (ii) 6% of the appraised unencumbered land value as of the date one year prior to the commencement of the renewal term in January 2024, assuming that a building can be erected on the land containing the greater of 375,000 square feet or such square footage as may be then permitted under zoning laws taking into account applicable floor area bonuses, if any, which are provided for in such zoning law, but not taking into account the possibility of obtaining any variance not currently in effect from such zoning law or of any transfer of unused development rights from another parcel as of a date one year prior to the commencement of the term.

■ Terrorism Insurance. The borrower is required to maintain (x) an “all-risk” insurance policy that provides coverage for terrorism in an amount equal to the full replacement cost of The Decoration & Design Building Property and (y) business interruption coverage with no exclusion for terrorism providing no less than 18 months of coverage in an amount equal to 100% of the projected gross income from The Decoration & Design Building Property (on an actual loss sustained basis) for a period continuing until the restoration of The Decoration & Design Building Property is completed, and containing an extended period endorsement which provides for up to six months of additional coverage. The “all-risk” policy containing terrorism insurance is required to contain a deductible that is no higher than $10,000. If TRIPRA or a similar or subsequent statute is not in effect, then provided that terrorism coverage is commercially available, the borrower is required to carry terrorism insurance throughout the term of The Decoration & Design Building Loan, but in such event the borrower is not required to spend on terrorism insurance coverage more than two times the amount of the insurance premium that is payable at such time in respect of the property and business interruption/rental loss insurance required under The Decoration & Design Building Loan documents (without giving effect to the cost of the terrorism component of such property and business interruption/rental loss insurance), and if the cost of terrorism insurance exceeds such amount, the borrower is required to purchase the maximum amount of terrorism insurance available with funds equal to such amount. See “Risk Factors—Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties” in the Prospectus Supplement.

B-66

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) 

B-67

HAMILTON LANDING

 

B-68

HAMILTON LANDING

 

B-69

HAMILTON LANDING

 

B-70

HAMILTON LANDING

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	1	Loan Seller		GSMC
Location (City/State)	Novato, California	Cut-off Date Principal Balance		$60,000,000
Property Type	Office	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per SF		$147.65
Size (SF)	406,355	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance		6.3%
Total Occupancy as of 7/1/2015(1)	91.8%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans		None
Owned Occupancy as of 7/1/2015(1)	91.8%	Type of Security		Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	1936 / 2000-2008	Mortgage Rate		4.3400%
Appraised Value	$84,700,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)		120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)		NAP
		Original Interest Only Period (Months)		120
Underwritten Revenues	$11,676,830
Underwritten Expenses	$4,857,675	Escrows
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$6,819,155		Upfront	Monthly
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$6,376,127	Taxes	$698,347	$139,669
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio	70.8%	Insurance	$0	$0
Maturity Date LTV Ratio	70.8%	Replacement Reserves	$0	$8,466
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF(1)	2.58x / 2.42x	TI/LC(2)	$3,000,000	$0
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF(1)	11.4% / 10.6%	Other(3)	$1,477,516	$0

Sources and Uses
Sources	$	%	Uses	$	%
Loan Amount	$60,000,000	66.9%	Purchase Price	$84,000,000	93.7%
Principal’s New Cash Contribution	29,657,931	33.1	Reserves	5,175,863	5.8
			Closing Costs	482,068	0.5
Total Sources	$89,657,931	100.0%	Total Uses	$89,657,931	100.0%

(1) Cytograft Tissue Eng, Inc. is currently in occupancy, but is not paying base rent. Without Cytograft, Total and Owned Occupancy are both 90.0%, the DSCR based on Underwritten NOI/NCF is 2.55x/2.39x, and the Debt Yield based on Underwritten NOI/NCF is 11.2%/10.5%. We cannot assure you that Cytograft Tissue Eng, Inc. will resume paying base rent as expected or at all.

(2) Upfront TI/LC reserve is $3,000,000. Until an acceptable Visual Concepts lease extension or the entering into one or more approved leases, the amount contained in the TI/LC reserve account is required to be no less than $1,000,000. See “—Escrows” below.

(3) Other upfront reserve represents unfunded obligations related to outstanding tenant improvements ($951,565), rent abatements ($394,680) and deferred maintenance primarily for roofing and HVAC ($131,272). See “—Escrows” below.

■ The Mortgage Loan. The mortgage loan (the “Hamilton Landing Loan”) is evidenced by a note in the original principal amount of $60,000,000 and is secured by a first mortgage encumbering the borrower’s fee simple interest in an office property located in Novato, California (the “Hamilton Landing Property”). The Hamilton Landing Loan was originated by Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company on July 22, 2015 and represents approximately 6.3% of the Initial Pool Balance. The note evidencing the Hamilton Landing Loan has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $60,000,000 and an interest rate of 4.3400% per annum. The borrower utilized the proceeds of the Hamilton Landing Loan to acquire the Hamilton Landing Property, fund reserves and pay origination costs.

The Hamilton Landing Loan had an initial term of 120 months and has a remaining term of 119 months as of the Cut-off Date. The Hamilton Landing Loan requires monthly payments of interest only during its term. The scheduled maturity date of the Hamilton Landing Loan is the due date in August 2025. Voluntary prepayment of the Hamilton Landing Loan is prohibited prior to the due date in February 2025. Provided that no event of default under the Hamilton Landing Loan is continuing, defeasance with direct, non-callable obligations of the United States of America is permitted at any time on or after the first due date following the second anniversary of the securitization Closing Date.

■ The Mortgaged Property. The Hamilton Landing Property is a 406,355 SF suburban creative office property located near Highway 101 in Novato, California (approximately 25 miles north of San Francisco). The Hamilton Landing Property is a former military base that was fully redeveloped from 2000 to 2008 by converting seven aircraft hangars into Class A creative office space. The design provides flexible floor plates and suite sizes ranging from approximately 1,000 SF to 60,000 SF, with upwards of 43-foot ceiling heights that can be divided into multiple levels. Historical year-end average occupancy has been 91.2% since 2006. As of July 1, 2015, Total Occupancy and Owned Occupancy at the Hamilton Landing Property were both 91.8%.

B-71

HAMILTON LANDING

The following table presents certain information relating to the buildings at the Hamilton Landing Property:

Building Summary

Building	Tenant Count	GLA (SF)	% of GLA	Occupancy(1)
Hangar 10	1	64,231	15.8%	100.0%
Hangar 7	2	60,686	14.9	100.0%
Hangar 9	1	58,704	14.4	77.8%
Hangar 6	9	57,862	14.2	92.9%
Hangar 4	2	57,513	14.2	79.9%
Hangar 5	3	55,358	13.6	100.0%
Hangar 3	11	52,001	12.8	91.2%
Total / Wtd. Avg.		406,355	100.0%	91.8%

(1) Occupancy is as of July 1, 2015.

Visual Concepts Entertainment, Inc. (“Visual Concepts”) is the largest tenant at the Hamilton Landing Property (109,923 SF and 31.7% of UW base rent). Visual Concepts is a subsidiary of Take-Two Interactive Software (NASDAQ: TTWO) that publishes, develops, and distributes video games. The Hamilton Landing Property serves as the main operations and headquarters for Visual Concepts. Take-Two Interactive Software has a market cap of approximately $2.4 billion and develops the Grand Theft Auto series, the NBA 2K series and the other “2K” sports series video games.

The following table presents certain information relating to the major tenants at the Hamilton Landing Property:

Ten Largest Tenants Based on Underwritten Base Rent

Tenant Name	Credit Rating (Fitch/MIS/S&P)(1)	Tenant GLA	% of GLA	UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent	UW Base Rent $ per SF	Lease Expiration	Renewal / Extension Options
Visual Concepts	NR / NR / NR	109,923	27.1%	$3,626,547	31.7%	$32.99	3/31/2019	1, 5-year extension option
Raptor Pharmaceutical Corp	NR / NR / NR	60,979	15.0	1,785,465	15.6	29.28	8/31/2021	1, 5-year extension option
Marin Community Foundation	NR / NR / NR	31,705	7.8	818,709	7.2	25.82	12/31/2018	2, 5-year extension options
Activision	NR / Ba2 / BB+	24,114	5.9	705,528	6.2	29.26	1/31/2016	NA
Meritage Medical Network	NR / NR / NR	22,266	5.5	676,886	5.9	30.40	5/31/2019	1, 5-year extension option
EDG Interior Architecture	NR / NR / NR	18,813	4.6	574,811	5.0	30.55	11/30/2024	1, 5-year extension option
Mistral Worldwise(2)	NR / NR / NR	18,502	4.6	542,784	4.7	29.34	10/15/2024	2, 5-year extension options
YMCA of SF	NR / NR / NR	11,769	2.9	408,149	3.6	34.68	9/30/2018	NA
Touch Factor	NR / NR / NR	10,876	2.7	345,857	3.0	31.80	1/31/2020	1, 5-year extension option
Verb Ventures, Inc. and Execrank, Inc.	NR / NR / NR	8,724	2.1	301,920	2.6	34.61	8/31/2017	NA
Largest Tenants		317,671	78.2%	$9,786,657	85.6%	$30.81
Remaining Tenants		55,374	13.6	1,651,801	14.4	29.83
Vacant		33,310	8.2	0	0.0	0.00
Totals / Wtd. Avg. Tenants		406,355	100.0%	$11,438,458	100.0%	$28.15

(1) Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease.

(2) Mistral Worldwise recently executed a lease to commence on October 15, 2015 and will pay 50% of its contractual base rent for the first 14 months of its lease. Underwritten Base Rent shows the full contractual base rent as an amount equal to the abated rent that was reserved for at origination ($317,981).

B-72

HAMILTON LANDING

The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the Hamilton Landing Property based on initial lease expiration dates:

Lease Expiration Schedule⁽¹⁾

Year Ending December 31,	Expiring Owned GLA	% of Owned GLA		Cumulative % of Owned GLA	UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent		UW Base Rent $ per SF	# of Expiring Leases
MTM	3,842	0.9	%	0.9%	$97,947	0.9	%	$25.49	2
2015	2,875	0.7		1.7%	89,700	0.8		31.20	1
2016	25,875	6.4		8.0%	766,772	6.7		29.63	3
2017	20,859	5.1		13.2%	665,045	5.8		31.88	4
2018	60,451	14.9		28.0%	1,712,129	15.0		28.32	6
2019	133,473	32.8		60.9%	4,343,109	38.0		32.54	5
2020	22,000	5.4		66.3%	686,512	6.0		31.21	5
2021	66,355	16.3		82.6%	1,959,648	17.1		29.53	3
2022	0	0.0		82.6%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2023	0	0.0		82.6%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2024	37,315	9.2		91.8%	1,117,595	9.8		29.95	3
2025	0	0.0		91.8%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2026 & Thereafter	0	0.0		91.8%	0	0.0		0.00	0
Vacant	33,310	8.2		100.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
Total / Wtd. Avg.	406,355	100.0	%		$11,438,458	100.0	%	$28.15	32

(1) Calculated based on approximate square footage occupied by each Owned Tenant.

The following table presents certain information relating to historical occupancy at the Hamilton Landing Property:

Historical Leased %⁽¹⁾

2012	2013	2014	As of 7/1/2015
89.2%	92.4%	86.5%	91.8%

(1) As provided by the borrower and reflects year-end occupancy for the indicated year (or other 12-month period) unless specified otherwise.

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Hamilton Landing Property:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

	2012	2013	2014(2)	Underwritten(3)(4)(5)	Underwritten $ per SF
Base Rent	$10,801,632	$11,053,542	$7,729,188	$11,438,458	$28.15
Gross Up Vacancy	0	0	0	1,020,155	2.51
Total Rent	$10,801,632	$11,053,542	$7,729,188	$12,458,613	$30.66
Total Reimbursables	267,819	467,373	344,562	350,812	0.86
Other Income	116,381	131,329	223,984	22,256	0.05
Less Vacancy & Credit Loss	0	0	0	(1,154,851)	(2.84)
Effective Gross Income	$11,185,832	$11,652,244	$8,297,734	$11,676,830	$28.74
Total Operating Expenses	$4,571,208	$4,931,599	$4,820,205	$4,857,675	$11.95
Net Operating Income	$6,614,624	$6,720,645	$3,477,529	$6,819,155	$16.78
TI/LC	0	0	0	365,821	0.90
Capital Expenditures	0	0	0	77,207	0.19
Net Cash Flow	$6,614,624	$6,720,645	$3,477,529	$6,376,127	$15.69

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, lease cancellation income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) Base Rent decreased in 2014 due to Disney’s 3D imaging division (ImageMovers Digital) vacating 120,000 SF at lease maturity in January 2014. The previous owner backfilled 106,000 of the vacated SF with three separate tenants (Visual Concepts, Raptor Pharmaceutical Corp and EDG Interior Architecture) within 5 months.

(3) Underwritten cash flow based on contractual rents as of July 1, 2015 and contractual rent steps through September 30, 2016.

(4) Cytograft Tissue Eng, Inc. ($217,010 UW Base Rent) has not made the last seven rental payments as of August 2015. We cannot assure you that the tenant will make its past due rent payments or ongoing payments as expected or at all. The UW NCF DSCR without Cytograft Tissue Eng, Inc. is 2.39x.

(5) Underwritten Base Rent includes full contracted rent for three tenants who are currently paying reduced rent as an amount equal to the abated rent for all three tenants was reserved for at origination. See “—Escrows” below.

B-73

HAMILTON LANDING

■ Appraisal. According to the appraisal, the Hamilton Landing Property had an “as-is” appraised value of $84,700,000 as of July 7, 2015.

■ Environmental Matters. According to a Phase I environmental report, dated June 12, 2015, there are no recognized environmental conditions or recommendations for further action at the Hamilton Landing Property other than a recommendation for a lead-based paint and lead-containing paint materials operations and maintenance (O&M) plan.

■ Market Overview and Competition. The Hamilton Landing Property is located in the North Bay/Santa Rosa office market. As of the first quarter of 2015, the market included a total of 41,046,127 SF office space, with 12.5% vacancy (5,130,766 SF vacant) and net absorption was 32,744 SF. The average rental rate for the submarket in the first quarter of 2015 was $23.32 per SF. The appraisal, quoted comparable rent rates range from $25.44 to $49.80 per SF while recent office leases at the property range from $27.81 to $34.61 per SF.

The following table presents certain information relating to certain office lease comparables provided in the appraisal for the Hamilton Landing Property:

Office Lease Comparables⁽¹⁾

	Hamilton Landing(2)	Rowland Plaza	Wood Island	Courthouse Square	Regency Center	Woodside Office Center (A)	Woodside Office Center (B)
Year Built	1936	1990	1976	1975	1988	2002	2002
Total GLA	406,355	80,159	36,865	95,462	130,000	90,214	90,214
Distance from Subject	NA	4.7 miles NW	10.0 miles south	7.8 miles north	4.0 miles north	5.6 miles NW	5.6 miles NW
Rent / SF	$28.15	$31.80	$49.80	$34.80	$31.80	$27.60	$25.44
Major Tenant(s)	Visual Concepts	Listing	Donahue Fitzgerald LLP	Glassberg, Pollak & Associates	Mighty Leaf Tea	American Pacific Mortgage	Andalou Naturals

(1) Source: Appraisal.

(2) As provided by the borrower.

The following table presents certain information relating to certain office sales comparables provided in the appraisal for the Hamilton Landing Property:

Office Sales Comparables⁽¹⁾

Property Name	City / State	Sale Date	GLA (SF)	Sale Price	Sale Price per SF	Total Occupancy
Hamilton Landing(2)	Novato, CA	June 2015	406,355	$84,000,000	$206.72	91.8%
Woodside Office Center	Novato, CA	July 2015	87,268	$16,250,000	$186.21	88.0%
Rowland Plaza	Novato, CA	June 2015	143,444	$24,900,000	$173.59	70.0%
San Rafael Center	San Rafael, CA	November 2014	126,774	$34,900,000	$275.29	97.0%
San Rafael Corporate Center	San Rafael, CA	February 2014	314,424	$116,500,000	$370.52	91.0%
Wood Island Office Complex	Larkspur, CA	January 2014	82,731	$39,000,000	$471.41	94.0%
Drakes Landing	Greenbrae, CA	December 2013	130,177	$61,000,000	$468.59	88.0%

(1) Source: Appraisal.

(2) As provided by the borrower.

■ The Borrower. The borrower is HL Novato, LLC, a single-purpose, single-asset entity. Legal counsel to the borrower delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the Hamilton Landing Loan. The non-recourse carveout guarantors under the Hamilton Landing Loan are Todd M. Gooding, ScanlanKemperBard Companies, LLC, and Robert D. Scanlan, each an indirect owner of the borrower.

ScanlanKemperBard Companies, LLC (“SKB”) is a real estate private equity firm based in Portland, Oregon. Since its inception in 1993, SKB has acquired, originated, and managed $3.51 billion worth of real estate comprised of approximately 26 million SF of office, industrial and retail space and 2,055 residential units.

B-74

HAMILTON LANDING

■ Escrows. On the origination date, the borrower funded (i) a tax reserve of $698,347, (ii) a tenant improvements and leasing commissions reserve of $3,000,000, (iii) a deferred maintenance reserve of $131,272 related to, among other things, roof repairs, and (iv) an unfunded obligations reserve of $1,346,245 related to unpaid tenant improvements, leasing commissions ($951,565) and free/reduced rent periods totaling $394,680 for Mistral Worldwise ($317,981), ET Water Suite ($59,174) and Pride Institute ($17,525). Until an acceptable Visual Concepts lease extension or the entering of one or more approved leases, the amount contained in the TI/LC reserve account is required to be no less than $1,000,000.

On each due date, the borrower is required to fund (i) a tax and insurance reserve in an amount equal to one-twelfth of the amount that the lender reasonably estimates will be necessary to pay taxes and insurance premiums over the then succeeding twelve-month period; provided, however, that reserve deposits for insurance premiums are not required if the borrower is maintaining a blanket policy in accordance with the Hamilton Landing Loan documents and there is no continuing event of default and (ii) a capital expenditure reserve in the amount of $8,466.

In addition, on each due date during the continuance of a Hamilton Landing Trigger Period, the Hamilton Landing Loan documents require an excess cash reserve or a rollover reserve as discussed under “—Lockbox and Cash Management” below.

A “Hamilton Landing Trigger Period” means any period (i) commencing upon the debt service coverage ratio (as calculated under the Hamilton Landing Loan documents) for the trailing 12-month period (as of the last day of any fiscal quarter) falling below 1.10x and ending at the conclusion of the second consecutive fiscal quarter for which the debt service coverage ratio is greater than 1.10x, (ii) commencing upon the borrower’s failure to deliver monthly, quarterly or annual financial reports and ending when such reports are delivered and they indicate that no other Hamilton Landing Trigger Period is ongoing; (iii) commencing when a natural person is not serving as a guarantor and such entity fails to maintain a net worth of $20,000,000 and liquid assets of $4,000,000 (in each case, excluding assets attributable to the Hamilton Landing Property), and ending when such net worth and liquid assets thresholds are satisfied; and (iv) commencing upon the occurrence of a Hamilton Landing Rollover Trigger Event and ending when either (a) in the case of any Hamilton Landing Rollover Trigger Event, the space is subject to one or more approved substitute leases, and each substitute tenant is in occupancy and paying normal monthly rent and has provided an acceptable estoppel certificate, or (b)(1) in the case of any Hamilton Landing Rollover Trigger Event solely under clause (A)(i) of that definition, Visual Concepts enters a renewal or extension of its existing lease for at least a 5-year term, (2) in the case of any Hamilton Landing Rollover Trigger Event solely under clause (A)(ii) of that definition, the borrower has provided written evidence of the cure of the default by the borrower, (3) in the case of any Hamilton Landing Rollover Trigger Event solely under clause (A)(iii) of that definition, Visual Concepts has recommenced its business and operations in its space and is paying rent and (4) in the case of any Hamilton Landing Rollover Trigger Event solely under clause (A)(iv) of that definition, Visual Concepts has affirmed its lease during the bankruptcy proceeding and is paying normal monthly rent.

A “Hamilton Landing Rollover Trigger Event” means any period when both of the following conditions exist: (A) the earliest of: (i) the date that Visual Concepts gives notice of an intent to terminate or vacate all or a material portion of its space or fails to give notice to renew its lease as of the date that is the earlier of the date required pursuant to its lease and 12 months prior to the expiration of its lease, (ii) a tenant or borrower default under the Visual Concepts lease (where the other party has a termination right), (iii) the date that Visual Concepts goes dark, discontinues its operations or business in all or substantially all of its space, vacates or is otherwise not in occupancy of all or substantially all of its space for a period of 60 consecutive days or more and excluding such events caused solely by casualty, condemnation, renovations or alterations undertaken pursuant to the terms of its lease, or (iv) the date of the filing of a bankruptcy petition by or against Visual Concepts or the guarantor under its lease, and (B) to the extent any event in (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) above occurs on or after the current expiration date of the Visual Concepts lease, the debt service coverage ratio (as calculated under the Hamilton Landing Loan documents) for the remainder of the Hamilton Landing Property is less than 1.20x.

B-75

HAMILTON LANDING

■ Lockbox and Cash Management. The Hamilton Landing Loan is structured with a hard lockbox and springing cash management. The Hamilton Landing Loan documents require the borrower to direct tenants to pay rent directly to a lender-controlled lockbox account, and require that all cash revenues relating to the Hamilton Landing Property and all other money received by the borrower or the property manager with respect to the Hamilton Landing Property (other than tenant security deposits) be deposited into such lockbox account or the cash management account within one business day following receipt. For so long as no Hamilton Landing Trigger Period or event of default is continuing, all funds in the lockbox account are required to be swept into a borrower-controlled operating account on a daily basis. During the continuance of a Hamilton Landing Trigger Period or event of default under the Hamilton Landing Loan, all funds in the lockbox account are required to be swept into a lender-controlled cash management account on a daily basis. On each due date during the continuance of a Hamilton Landing Trigger Period or, at the lender’s discretion, during an event of default under the Hamilton Landing Loan, the Hamilton Landing Loan documents require that all amounts on deposit in the cash management account be used to pay debt service, required reserves and operating expenses, and that all remaining amounts be reserved in (i) an excess cash flow reserve account during the continuance of a Hamilton Landing Trigger Period (other than a Hamilton Landing Trigger Period caused by a Hamilton Landing Rollover Trigger Event) or event of default under the Hamilton Landing Loan or (ii) a rollover reserve account during the continuance of a Hamilton Landing Trigger Period caused by a Hamilton Landing Rollover Trigger Event.

■ Property Management. The Hamilton Landing Property is managed by SKB PM I California, Limited Partnership pursuant to a management agreement. Under the Hamilton Landing Loan documents, the Hamilton Landing Property is required to remain managed by SKB PM I California, Limited Partnership or any other management company approved by the lender and with respect to which Rating Agency Confirmation has been received. The lender has the right to replace, or require the borrower to replace, the property manager with a property manager selected by the lender (i) during the continuance of an event of default under the Hamilton Landing Loan, (ii) following any foreclosure, conveyance in lieu of foreclosure or other similar transaction, (iii) if the property manager files for or is the subject of a petition in bankruptcy or (iv) if a trustee or receiver is appointed for the property manager’s assets or the property manager makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors or is adjudicated insolvent.

■ Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. The Hamilton Landing Loan documents permit future mezzanine financing in connection with the sale of the Hamilton Landing Property and the assumption of the Hamilton Landing Loan, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the Hamilton Landing Loan documents, including among others: (i) no event of default under the Hamilton Landing Loan is ongoing; (ii) execution of an intercreditor agreement in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the lender and any Rating Agency; (iii) the mezzanine loan together with the Hamilton Landing Loan has a combined loan-to-value ratio (as calculated under the Hamilton Landing Loan documents) of no greater than 75%; (iv) the debt service coverage ratio (as calculated under the Hamilton Landing Loan documents and taking into account the mezzanine loan and the Hamilton Landing Loan) is at least 1.30x; (v) the combined debt yield (as calculated under the Hamilton Landing Loan documents) of the mezzanine loan and the Hamilton Landing Loan is equal to or greater than 103% of 10.46%; (vi) the mezzanine loan is subordinate to the Hamilton Landing Loan; and (vii) receipt of a Rating Agency Confirmation.

B-76

HAMILTON LANDING

■ Terrorism Insurance. So long as TRIPRA or a similar or subsequent statute is in effect, the borrower is required to maintain terrorism insurance for foreign and domestic acts (as those terms are defined in TRIPRA or similar or subsequent statute) in an amount equal to the full replacement cost of the Hamilton Landing Property (plus 18 months of rental loss and/or business interruption coverage plus an additional period of indemnity covering the 12 months following restoration). If TRIPRA or a similar or subsequent statute is not in effect, then provided that terrorism insurance is commercially available, the borrower will be required to carry terrorism insurance throughout the term of the Hamilton Landing Loan as described in the preceding sentence, but in that event the borrower will not be required to spend more than two times the amount of the insurance premium that is payable at that time in respect of the property and business interruption/rental loss insurance required under the related loan documents (without giving effect to the cost of terrorism and earthquake components of such property and business interruption/rental loss insurance), and if the cost of terrorism insurance exceeds such amount, then the borrower will be required to purchase the maximum amount of terrorism insurance available with funds equal to such amount. In either such case, terrorism insurance may not have a deductible in excess of $50,000. The required terrorism insurance may be included in a blanket policy, provided that the borrower provides evidence satisfactory to the lender that the insurance premiums for the Hamilton Landing Property are separately allocated to the Hamilton Landing Property and that the policy will provide the same protection as a separate policy. See “Risk Factors—Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties” in the Prospectus Supplement.

B-77

COURTYARD SUNNYVALE

 

B-78

COURTYARD SUNNYVALE

B-79

COURTYARD SUNNYVALE

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	1	Loan Seller		GSMC
Location (City/State)	Sunnyvale, California	Cut-off Date Principal Balance		$40,600,000
Property Type	Hospitality	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per Room		$280,000.00
Size (Rooms)	145	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance		4.2%
Total Occupancy for T9 as of 7/31/2015(1)	75.3%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans		None
Owned Occupancy for T9 as of 7/31/2015(1)	75.3%	Type of Security	Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	2014 / NAP	Mortgage Rate		4.7230%
Appraised Value	$58,000,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)		120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)		360
		Original Interest Only Period (Months)	60
Underwritten Revenues	$10,102,077
Underwritten Expenses	$5,224,946
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$4,877,131	Escrows
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$4,473,048		Upfront	Monthly
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio	70.0%	Taxes	$130,002	$21,667
Maturity Date LTV Ratio(2)	61.5%	Insurance	$16,127	$8,063
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	1.93x / 1.77x	FF&E	$0	$33,788
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	12.0% / 11.0%	Other	$0	$0

 Sources and Uses 

Sources	$	%	Uses	$	%
Loan Amount	$40,600,000	100.0%	Principal Equity Distribution	$23,408,693	57.7	%
			Loan Payoff	16,613,607	40.9
			Closing Costs	431,571	1.1
			Reserves	146,129	0.4
Total Sources	$40,600,000	100.0%	Total Uses	$40,600,000	100.0	%

(1) Total Occupancy and Owned Occupancy represent actual results for the 9-month period from November 30, 2014 through July 31, 2015. Underwritten Total Occupancy and Owned Occupancy are both 81.2%.

(2) The Maturity Date LTV Ratio is calculated utilizing the “as stabilized” appraised value of $60,600,000. The Maturity Date LTV Ratio calculated on the basis of the “as-is” appraised value is 64.3%. See “—Appraisal” below.

■ The Mortgage Loan. The mortgage loan (the “Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan”) is evidenced by a note in the original principal amount of $40,600,000 and is secured by a first mortgage encumbering the borrower’s fee simple interest in a select service hotel property located in Sunnyvale, California (the ”Courtyard Sunnyvale Property”). The Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan was originated by Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company on August 14, 2015 and represents approximately 4.2% of the Initial Pool Balance. The note evidencing the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $40,600,000 and an interest rate of 4.7230% per annum. The borrower utilized the proceeds of the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan to refinance the existing debt on the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property, pay origination costs and return equity to the borrower sponsor.

The Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan had an initial term of 120 months and has a remaining term of 120 months as of the Cut-off Date. The Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan requires monthly payments of interest only for the initial 60 months, followed by monthly payments of interest and principal sufficient to amortize the loan over a 30-year amortization schedule. The scheduled maturity date of the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan is the due date in September 2025. Voluntary prepayment of the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan is prohibited prior to March 6, 2025. Provided that no event of default under the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan is continuing, defeasance with direct, non-callable obligations of the United States of America is permitted at any time on or after the first due date following the second anniversary of the securitization Closing Date.

■ The Mortgaged Property. The Courtyard Sunnyvale Property is a 145-room select service hotel located in Sunnyvale, California. The Courtyard Sunnyvale Property was constructed in 2014 and is located on a 1.94 acre parcel located at 660 West El Camino Real. The Courtyard Sunnyvale Property features food and beverage outlets, a fitness center, a business center, 300 SF of meeting space and an outdoor pool. Total Occupancy and Owned Occupancy represent actual results for the 9-month period from November 30, 2014 through July 31, 2015. Underwritten Total Occupancy and Owned Occupancy are both 81.2%.

B-80

COURTYARD SUNNYVALE

The following table presents certain information relating to the 2014 demand analysis with respect to the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property based on market segmentation, as provided in the appraisal for the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property:

2014 Accommodated Room Night Demand⁽¹⁾

Property	Meeting and Group	Leisure	Commercial
Courtyard Sunnyvale	10.0%	15.0%	75.0%

(1) Source: Appraisal.

The following table presents certain information relating to the penetration rates relating to the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property, as provided in a June 2015 travel research report for the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property: 

Penetration Rates⁽¹⁾

	Occupancy	ADR	RevPAR
YTD June 2015	94.0%	108.9%	102.4%
TTM June 2015(2)	85.9%	112.6%	96.8%

(1) Source: June 2015 travel research report.

(2) The Courtyard Sunnyvale Property opened in October 2014.

The following table presents certain information relating to historical occupancy, ADR and RevPAR at the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property:

Courtyard Sunnyvale⁽¹⁾

	T9 7/31/2015 (Open to Date)(2)	Underwritten(3)
Occupancy	75.3%	81.2%
ADR	$224.83	$221.46
RevPAR	$169.30	$179.88

(1) As provided by the borrower and reflects average occupancy, ADR and RevPAR for the indicated period.

(2) T9 7/31/2015 (Open to Date) reflects the trailing 9-month performance from November 30, 2014 (first full month of operations) through July 31, 2015.

(3) Underwritten metrics reflect actual results for the 7-month period from January 2015 through July 2015 and the borrower’s budget for the remaining 5-month period through December 2015.

B-81

COURTYARD SUNNYVALE

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

	T9 7/31/2015 (Open to Date)(2)	Underwritten(3)	Underwritten $ per Room
Rooms Revenue	$6,701,629	$9,520,321	$65,657
Food & Beverage Revenue	229,796	337,011	2,324
Telephone Revenue	889	0	0
Other Revenue	168,278	244,745	1,688
Total Revenue	$7,100,592	$10,102,077	$69,669
Room Expense	1,126,333	1,550,455	10,693
Food & Beverage Expense	241,936	319,651	2,204
Other Expense	44,437	57,889	399
Total Departmental Expense	$1,412,706	$1,927,995	$13,297
Total Undistributed Expense	2,074,415	2,940,188	20,277
Total Fixed Expense	142,696	356,763	2,460
Total Operating Expenses	$3,629,817	$5,224,946	$36,034
Net Operating Income	$3,470,775	$4,877,131	$33,635
FF&E	284,024	404,083	2,787
Net Cash Flow	$3,186,751	$4,473,048	$30,849

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) T9 7/31/2015 (Open to Date) reflects the trailing 9-month performance from November 30, 2014 (first full month of operations) through July 31, 2015.

(3) Underwritten metrics reflect actual results for the 7-month period from January 2015 through July 2015 (representative of $182.42 average RevPAR) and the budget provided by the borrower for the remaining 5-month period (representative of $176.81 average RevPAR).

■ Appraisal. According to the appraisal, the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property had an “as-is” appraised value of $58,000,000 as of July 7, 2015 and an “as stabilized” appraised value of $60,600,000 as of August 1, 2018, which assumes stabilized operations and 80.0% occupancy.

■ Environmental Matters. According to a Phase I environmental report, dated July 17, 2015, the environmental consultant identified the former presence of an automotive dealership at the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property as a historical recognized environmental condition. Three underground storage tanks were removed from the southern abutting parcel in 1990 and subsurface investigations conducted at the dealership site in 1990 and 2010 identified levels of solvent contamination in one localized soil area that were below applicable environmental screening levels. In addition, the environmental consultant noted that residential redevelopment on the southern abutting parcel indicated that the local soil mitigation requirements for residential land use were completed, and that soil excavation to depths of 3 to 5 feet and installation of a vapor barrier would be standard for construction of a hotel building. The Phase I environmental report recommended no further investigation.

B-82

COURTYARD SUNNYVALE

■ Market Overview and Competition. The Courtyard Sunnyvale Property is located in the Sunnyvale submarket of Sunnyvale, California. The Courtyard Sunnyvale Property and its competitive set have an average occupancy of 84.1%, ADR of $210.42, and RevPAR of $176.95 as of the year to date period ended June 30, 2015.

The following table presents certain information relating to the primary competition for the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property:

Competitive Set⁽¹⁾
 

Property	Number of Rooms	Year Built	YTD June 2015 Occupancy	YTD June 2015 ADR	YTD June 2015 RevPAR
Courtyard Sunnyvale	145	2014	79.1%	$229.14	$181.15
Competitive Set
Hilton Garden Inn Mountain View	160	1999	NAV	NAV	NAV
Hampton Inn Suites Mountain View Silicon Valley	88	2004	NAV	NAV	NAV
Joie De Vivre Hotel Avante	91	1985	NAV	NAV	NAV
Courtyard San Jose Cupertino	149	1988	NAV	NAV	NAV
TownePlace Suites Sunnyvale Mountain View	94	2003	NAV	NAV	NAV
Aloft Hotel Cupertino	123	2013	NAV	NAV	NAV
Total / Wtd. Avg. Competitive Set			84.1%	$210.42	$176.95

(1) Source: June 2015 travel research report.

■ The Borrower. The borrower is T Alliance Three - Sunnyvale, LLC, a single-purpose, single-asset entity. Legal counsel to the borrower delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan. The non-recourse carveout guarantors under the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan are the Mayur B. Patel Family Trust Dated April 1, 2002, the majority indirect owner of the borrower, and Mayur B. Patel, the trustee of the Mayur B. Patel Family Trust dated April 1, 2002.

T2 Hospitality, an indirect owner of the borrower, is a turn-key hotel investment company that specializes in owning, operating and developing hospitality assets. T2 Hospitality’s current portfolio consists of over 5,000 rooms across 18 properties, all of which are located in California, with the exception of one. T2 Hospitality, a privately owned hotel company, is an affiliate of Tarsadia Hotels.

■ Escrows. On the origination date, the borrower funded (i) a tax reserve of $130,002 and (ii) an insurance reserve of $16,127.

On each due date, the borrower is required to fund (i) a tax and insurance reserve in an amount equal to one-twelfth of the amount that the lender reasonably estimates will be necessary to pay taxes and insurance premiums over the then succeeding 12-month period and (ii) an FF&E reserve in the amount of (a) on each due date from October 2015 through and including September 2016, $33,788, and (b) beginning on the due date in October 2016, the greater of (1) the monthly amount required to be reserved for the replacement of furniture, fixtures and equipment pursuant to the franchise agreement and (2) one-twelfth of 4% (or 5% beginning on the due date in October 2017) of the operating income for the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property for the previous 12-month period (as determined on August 31 of each year).

In addition, on each due date during the continuance of a Courtyard Sunnyvale Trigger Period, the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan documents require an excess cash reserve as discussed under “—Lockbox and Cash Management” below.

A “Courtyard Sunnyvale Trigger Period” means (i) any period commencing as of the conclusion of any 12-month period (ending on the last day of any fiscal quarter) beginning December 31, 2015 during which the debt service coverage ratio (as calculated under the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan documents) is less than 1.30x, and ending at the conclusion of the second fiscal quarter for which the debt service coverage ratio for the trailing twelve-month period (ending on the last day of any fiscal quarter) is greater than 1.30x, or (ii) the period commencing upon the borrower’s failure to deliver monthly, quarterly or annual financial reports and ending when such reports are delivered and they indicate that no other Courtyard Sunnyvale Trigger Period is ongoing.

B-83

COURTYARD SUNNYVALE

■ Lockbox and Cash Management. The Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan is structured with a hard lockbox and springing cash management. The Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan documents require the borrower to direct credit card companies to remit all credit card receivables directly to a lender-controlled lockbox account, and require that all cash revenues relating to the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property and all other money received by the borrower or the property manager with respect to the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property be deposited into such lockbox account or a lender-controlled cash management account within one business day following receipt. On each business day that no Courtyard Sunnyvale Cash Management Period is continuing, all funds in the lockbox account are required to be swept into a borrower-controlled operating account. On each business day during the continuance of a Courtyard Sunnyvale Cash Management Period, all funds in the lockbox account are required to be swept into a lender-controlled cash management account and (a) if a Courtyard Sunnyvale Trigger Period is continuing (or, at the lender’s discretion, during the continuance of an event of default under the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan documents), be used to pay debt service, required reserves and operating expenses, with all remaining amounts reserved in an excess cash flow reserve account or (b) if no Courtyard Sunnyvale Trigger Period or event of default is continuing under the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan documents, the borrower-controlled operating account. During the continuance of an event of default under the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan, the lender may apply all funds on deposit in any of the accounts constituting collateral for the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan to amounts payable under the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan documents and/or toward the payment of expenses of the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property, in such order of priority as the lender may determine.

A “Courtyard Sunnyvale Cash Management Period” means any period (i) during the continuance of the initial Courtyard Sunnyvale Trigger Period, (ii) during the continuance of the initial event of default under the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan or (iii) commencing upon the occurrence of any subsequent Courtyard Sunnyvale Trigger Period or event of default under the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan and ending upon the satisfaction of the indebtedness under the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan.

■ Property Management. The Courtyard Sunnyvale Property is managed by Evolution Hospitality, LLC pursuant to a management agreement that expires in January 2018. Under the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan documents, the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property is required to remain managed by Evolution Hospitality, LLC or any other management company approved by the lender and with respect to which Rating Agency Confirmation has been received. The lender has the right to replace, or require the borrower to replace, the property manager with a property manager selected by the lender (i) during the continuance of an event of default under the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan, (ii) following any foreclosure, conveyance in lieu of foreclosure or other similar transaction, (iii) during the continuance of a material default by the property manager under the management agreement (after the expiration of any applicable notice and/or cure periods), (iv) if the property manager files for or is the subject of a petition in bankruptcy or (v) if a trustee or receiver is appointed for the property manager’s assets or the property manager makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors or is adjudicated insolvent.

■ Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.

B-84

COURTYARD SUNNYVALE

■ Terrorism Insurance. So long as TRIPRA or a similar or subsequent statute is in effect, the borrower is required to maintain terrorism insurance for foreign and domestic acts (as those terms are defined in TRIPRA or similar or subsequent statute) in an amount equal to the full replacement cost of the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property (plus 18 months of rental loss and/or business interruption coverage plus an additional period of indemnity covering the 12 months following restoration). If TRIPRA or a similar or subsequent statute is not in effect, then provided that terrorism insurance is commercially available, the borrower is required to carry terrorism insurance throughout the term of the Courtyard Sunnyvale Loan as described in the preceding sentence, but in that event the borrower is not required to spend more than two times the amount of the insurance premium that is payable at that time in respect of the property and business interruption/rental loss insurance required under the related loan documents (without giving effect to the cost of terrorism and earthquake components of such property and business interruption/rental loss insurance), and if the cost of terrorism insurance exceeds such amount, then the borrower will be required to purchase the maximum amount of terrorism insurance available with funds equal to such amount. In either such case, terrorism insurance may only have a deductible acceptable to the lender in its sole discretion. The required terrorism insurance may be included in a blanket policy, provided that the borrower provides evidence satisfactory to the lender that the insurance premiums for the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property are separately allocated to the Courtyard Sunnyvale Property and that the policy will provide the same protection as a separate policy. See “Risk Factors—Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties” in the Prospectus Supplement.

B-85

SOMERSET PARK APARTMENTS

B-86

SOMERSET PARK APARTMENTS

B-87

SOMERSET PARK APARTMENTS

B-88

SOMERSET PARK APARTMENTS

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	1	Loan Seller		RMF
Location (City/State)	Troy, Michigan	Cut-off Date Principal Balance(3)		$36,500,000
Property Type	Multifamily	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per Unit(2)		$80,862.53
Size (Units)	2,226	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance		3.8%
Total Occupancy as of 8/11/2015	93.2%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans		None
Owned Occupancy as of 8/11/2015	93.2%	Type of Security		Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	1964 / 2015	Mortgage Rate		4.5500%
Appraised Value(1)	$249,750,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)		120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)		NAP
		Original Interest Only Period (Months)		120
Underwritten Revenues	$24,789,739
Underwritten Expenses	$9,759,082	Escrows
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$15,030,657		Upfront	Monthly
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$14,719,017	Taxes	$672,715	$106,780
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(1)(2)	72.1%	Insurance	$0	Springing
Maturity Date LTV Ratio(1)(2)	72.1%	Replacement Reserves	$26,500,000	$46,375
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF(2)	1.81x / 1.77x	TI/LC	$0	$0
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF(2)	8.4% / 8.2%	Other(4)	$1,875	$0

Sources and Uses
Sources	$	%	Uses	$	%
Mortgage Loan Combination Amount	$180,000,000	73.2%	Purchase Price	$216,000,000	87.8%
Principal’s New Cash Contribution	65,943,738	26.8	Reserves	27,174,590	11.0
			Closing Costs	2,769,148	1.1
Total Sources	$245,943,738	100.0%	Total Uses	$245,943,738	100.0%

(1) The Appraised Value assumes the completion of $14.6 million of capital improvements as of May 20, 2016. An upfront replacement reserve of $26.5 million is in place. The appraiser concluded an “as-is” appraised value of $227,500,000. The Cut-off Date LTV Ratio and Maturity Date LTV Ratio based on the “as-is” appraised value are both 79.1%.

(2) Calculated based on the aggregate balance of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination of $180,000,000.

(3) The Cut-off Date Principal Balance of $36,500,000 represents non-controlling notes A-1-3 and A-2-3 of a $180,000,000 loan combination evidenced by six pari passu notes. The companion loans are evidenced by: (i) the controlling notes A-1-1 and A-2-1 with an aggregate principal balance of $73,500,000 as of the Cut-off Date, which were contributed to the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-C30, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C30 (“WFCM 2015-C30”) transaction; and (ii) the non-controlling notes A-1-2 and A-2-2 with an aggregate principal balance of $70,000,000 as of the Cut-off Date, which are expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization transactions.

(4) Other Upfront reserve represents a $1,875 environmental reserve.

■ The Mortgage Loan. The mortgage loan (the “Somerset Park Apartments Loan”) is part of a $180.0 million loan combination (the “Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination”) comprised of six pari passu notes that are together secured by a first mortgage encumbering the borrowers’ fee simple interest in a 2,226-unit multifamily complex located in Troy, Michigan (the “Somerset Park Apartments Property”). The Somerset Park Apartments Loan (which is evidenced by notes A-1-3 and A-2-3, and represents a non-controlling interest in the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination) will be contributed to the issuing entity, has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $36,500,000 and represents 3.8% of the Initial Pool Balance. The related companion loans (the “Somerset Park Apartments Companion Loans”) are held outside the issuing entity and are evidenced by the following four pari passu notes: (i) notes A-1-1 and A-2-1, which represent the controlling interest in the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination, have an aggregate outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $73,500,000 and were contributed to the WFCM 2015-C30 transaction; and (ii) notes A-1-2 and A-2-2, which represent a non-controlling interest in the Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination, have an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $70,000,000, are currently held by Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC and are expected to be contributed to one or more future securitization transactions. The Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination was originated by Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC on June 30, 2015, and each note has an interest rate of 4.5500% per annum. The proceeds of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan were primarily used to acquire the Somerset Park Apartments Property. The Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination is being serviced under the WFCM 2015-C30 pooling and servicing agreement. See “Description of the Mortgage Pool—The Loan Combinations” in the Prospectus Supplement for more information regarding the co-lender agreement that governs the relative rights of the holders of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan and the Somerset Park Apartments Companion Loan.

The Somerset Park Apartments Loan had an initial term of 120 months, has a remaining term of 118 months as of the Cut-off Date and requires 120 interest-only payments. The scheduled maturity date of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan is the due date in July 2025. Voluntary prepayment of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan is permitted on or after the due date in January 2025. Defeasance of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan with direct, non-callable obligations of the United States of America or other obligations which are “government

B-89

SOMERSET PARK APARTMENTS

securities” permitted under the related loan documents is permitted at any time after the second anniversary of the securitization Closing Date.

■ The Mortgaged Property. The Somerset Park Apartments Property is a 2,226-unit garden-style multifamily property consisting of 158 two-story residential buildings situated on approximately 290.0 acres and located in Troy, Michigan. The Somerset Park Apartments Property is located 20 miles northwest of the Detroit central business district and adjacent to Somerset Collection, an upscale, luxury super-regional mall with more than 180 specialty stores. The Somerset Park Apartments Property was constructed from 1964 to 1970 and features 594 one-bedroom units, 1,500 two-bedroom units (including townhomes) and 132 three-bedroom units (including townhomes). The one-bedroom units have floor plans ranging from 700 to 1,100 square feet and average 860 square feet; the two-bedroom units have floor plans ranging from 850 to 1,600 square feet and average 1,172 square feet; the three-bedroom units have floor plans ranging from 924 to 1,800 square feet and average 1,674 square feet; the two-bedroom townhomes have floor plans ranging from 1,276 to 1,550 square feet and average 1,456 square feet, and the three-bedroom townhomes have floor plans totaling 1,600 square feet. Overall, unit sizes range from 700 square feet to 1,800 square feet, with an average unit size of 1,124 square feet. Community amenities consist of a nine-hole golf course, a 16-acre park, a 2.5-mile walking path, five swimming pools with sun decks, a fitness center, eight tennis courts, a sand volleyball court, a basketball court, a softball field, cross-county skiing trails, a children’s playground, a leasing office and an activities center. Unit amenities include fully equipped kitchens, ceramic tiled baths, large closets, private patios/balconies, covered parking, ceiling fans, individual alarm systems, and washer/dryer connections. Selected units feature private entrances and walk-in closets. The Somerset Park Apartments Property contains 4,166 surface and carport parking spaces, reflecting an overall parking ratio of 1.9 spaces per unit. As of August 11, 2015, Total Occupancy and Owned Occupancy were both 93.2%.

Following the acquisition of the Somerset Park Apartments Property, the borrowers plan to invest approximately $14.6 million by June 2016 and $34.2 million ($15,364 per unit) in total in the Somerset Park Apartments Property for unit interior renovations, the addition of washer and dryers to each unit and the conversion of the two-bedroom/one bathroom units to two-bedroom/two bathroom units. Additional planned renovations include replacement of all unit windows and updates to all common hallways. Renovations are also planned for the common amenities, including updating the leasing office and activities buildings. Interior unit renovations will take place initially in currently vacant units; the currently occupied units will be renovated thereafter as they turn over, and are expected to be completed within five years.

The following table presents certain information relating to the units and rent at the Somerset Park Apartments Property:

Unit Mix⁽¹⁾

Unit Type	Occupied Units	Vacant Units	Total Units	% of Total Units		Average SF per Unit	Monthly Market Rent per Unit(2)	Monthly Actual Rent per Unit	Monthly Underwritten Rent per Unit	Underwritten Annual Rent
1 Bedroom / 1 Bath	530	64	594	26.7	%	860	$845	$813	$813	$5,172,156
2 Bedroom / 1 Bath	920	102	1,022	45.9		1,068	$949	$942	$942	10,400,808
2 Bedroom / 2 Bath	391	33	424	19.0		1,420	$1,107	$1,117	$1,117	5,241,588
2 Bedroom / 1.5 Bath Townhouse	54	0	54	2.4		1,456	$1,282	$1,294	$1,294	838,500
3 Bedroom / 2 Bath	95	17	112	5.0		1,674	$1,462	$1,484	$1,484	1,692,060
3 Bedroom / 2.5 Bath Townhouse	18	2	20	0.9		1,600	$1,550	$1,510	$1,510	326,100
Total / Wtd. Avg.	2,008	218	2,226	100.0	%	1,124	$991	$982	$982	$23,671,212

(1) As provided by the borrowers per the underwritten June 1, 2015 rent roll.

(2) Source: Appraisal

B-90

SOMERSET PARK APARTMENTS

The following table presents certain information relating to historical leasing at the Somerset Park Apartments Property:

Historical Leased %⁽¹⁾

	2012	2013	2014	As of 8/11/2015
Owned Space	88.6%	85.2%	89.0%	93.2%

(1) As provided by the borrowers and which represents occupancy as of December 31 for the indicated year, unless specified otherwise.

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Somerset Park Apartments Property:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

	2012		2013		2014		TTM 5/31/2015		Underwritten(2)		Underwritten $ per Unit
Base Rent	$23,527,795		$24,671,362		$25,619,513		$26,164,959		$23,671,212		$10,634
Gross Up Vacancy	0		0		0		0		2,584,442		1,161
Goss Potential Rent	$23,527,795		$24,671,362		$25,619,513		$26,164,959		$26,255,654		$11,795
Vacancy, Credit Loss & Concessions	(3,148,730	)	(3,238,295	)	(3,280,155	)	(3,302,927	)	(2,669,335	)	(1,199	)
Total Rent Revenue	$20,379,065		$21,433,067		$22,339,358		$22,862,032		$23,586,319		$10,596
Other Revenue (3)	1,029,576		1,072,722		1,116,409		1,203,420		1,203,420		541
Effective Gross Income	$21,408,641		$22,505,789		$23,455,767		$24,065,452		$24,789,739		$11,136
Total Operating Expenses	$8,411,600		$8,883,836		$9,365,697		$9,317,835		$9,759,082		$4,384
Net Operating Income	$12,997,041		$13,621,953		$14,090,070		$14,747,617		$15,030,657		$6,752
Replacement Reserves	0		0		0		0		311,640		140
Net Cash Flow	$12,997,041		$13,621,953		$14,090,070		$14,747,617		$14,719,017		$6,612

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) Underwritten cash flow is based on the June 1, 2015 rent roll.

(3) Other Revenue includes application fees, pet fees, forfeited deposits, break-lease fees, laundry income, washer/dryer income, late fees, and miscellaneous charges.

■ Appraisal. According to the appraisal, the Somerset Park Apartments Property had an “as-is” appraised value of $227,500,000 as of May 20, 2015. The appraiser also concluded to an “as stabilized” value of $249,750,000 with an “as stabilized” valuation date of May 20, 2016. The “as stabilized” valuation assumes that approximately $14.6 million in renovations will be completed by May 2016. The borrowers reserved $26.5 million of the approximate $34.2 million in aggregate budgeted renovation costs at origination.

■ Environmental Matters. According to a Phase I environmental report, dated June 2, 2015, there are no recommendations for further action at the Somerset Park Apartments Property other than a recommendation for an asbestos operations and maintenance (O&M) plan.

■ Market Overview and Competition. The Somerset Park Apartments Property is located in Troy, Michigan, approximately 20.0 miles northwest of the Detroit central business district. The Detroit metropolitan statistical area’s population of 4.3 million accounts for approximately 43.4% of the state of Michigan. Land uses surrounding the Somerset Park Apartments Property consist of retail and commercial developments along the Big Beaver Road corridor (the primary commercial artery for the neighborhood) interspersed with residential development. The Somerset Collection, located directly adjacent to the Somerset Park Apartments Property, is a super-regional mall containing approximately 1.5 million square feet with more than 180 stores and is anchored by Neiman Marcus, Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom and Macy’s. The area’s largest automobile corridor, the Troy Motor Mall, is located just south of the Somerset Park Apartments Property and offers domestic and import brands as well as luxury brands such as Rolls Royce, Bentley, Bugatti and Lamborghini. Additional retailers are located along Big Beaver Road, the primary commercial corridor in the area, including freestanding and in-line retail, bank

B-91

SOMERSET PARK APARTMENTS

branches, and restaurants. Big Beaver Road is also a significant office corridor for the area, with approximately half of the 13.0 million square feet of office space found within the Troy office market.

Primary regional access to the neighborhood is provided by Interstate 75, located approximately 1.6 miles east of the Somerset Park Apartments Property. Interstate 75 is the primary north/south freeway through the Detroit metropolitan statistical area and connects to Interstate 696, which is the primary east/west freeway through the northern suburbs of Detroit. The Somerset Park Apartments Property is situated two blocks south of Big Beaver Road, the primary east/west commercial thoroughfare through Troy. The estimated 2015 population within a one-, three-, and five-mile radius of the Somerset Park Apartments Property is 8,471, 89,070 and 242,570, respectively, and the average household income within the same radii is $84,985, $100,794 and $98,333, respectively.

The following table presents certain information relating to the primary competition for the Somerset Park Apartments Property:

Competitive Set⁽¹⁾

	Somerset Park Apartments	Eagles Landing of Troy	Village Green of Troy	Charter Square Apartments	Buckingham Square Apartments	Amber Creek Village
Location	Troy	Troy	Troy	Troy	Troy	Troy
Year Built	1964	1974	1974	1967	1968	1969
Occupancy	90.2%	97.0%	99.0%	98.0%	98.0%	99.0%
No. of Units	2,226	544	168	492	146	91
Distance	—	3.0 miles	2.6 miles	1.9 miles	4.4 miles	2.1 miles

(1) Source: Appraisal.

■ The Borrowers. The borrowers, Troy Apts I, LLC, Troy Apts II, LLC, Troy Apts III, LLC and Troy Apts IV, LLC, are tenant-in-common borrowers, each structured as a single purpose entity with two independent directors. Legal counsel to the borrowers delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan. The non-recourse carve-out guarantors are Marc S. Solomon and Mark S. Rosen.

■ Escrows. On the origination date of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan, the borrowers funded escrow reserves of approximately $26,500,000 with respect to replacement reserves, $672,715 with respect to real estate taxes, and $1,875 with respect to an environmental reserve.

On each due date, the borrowers are required to fund the following reserves with respect to the Somerset Park Apartments Loan: (i) a tax reserve in an amount equal to one-twelfth of the amount that the lender estimates will be necessary to pay taxes over the then succeeding 12-month period and (ii) a replacement reserve in an amount equal to $46,375. The related loan documents do not require monthly escrows for insurance provided that (i) no event of default has occurred and is continuing; (ii) the Somerset Park Apartments Property is insured via an acceptable blanket insurance policy; and (iii) the borrowers provide the lender with evidence of renewal of the insurance policies and timely proof of payment of the insurance premiums when due.

The $26.5 million upfront replacement reserve will be used for unit interior renovations ($13,680,000), the addition of washers and dryers to each unit ($6,100,000) and the conversion of the two-bedroom/one bathroom units to two-bedroom/two-bathroom units ($3,350,000). Additional renovations include replacement of all unit windows and updates to all common hallways. Improvements are also planned for the common amenities, including updating the leasing office and activities buildings. The borrowers plan to spend approximately $34.2 million ($15,364 per unit) on the renovation, of which approximately $14.6 million is expected to be completed by the end of May 2016. Funds in the capital expenditure reserve will be released as renovations are completed until a balance of $5.0 million is reached, which will not be released to the borrowers until the $26.5 million in capital improvements are completed and the Somerset Park Apartments Property achieves a net operating income debt yield of at least 8.75% based on the trailing twelve months’ performance.

B-92

SOMERSET PARK APARTMENTS

■ Lockbox and Cash Management. The Somerset Park Apartments Loan requires a springing lockbox and springing cash management, which will be established upon written notification from the lender to the lockbox bank. Upon the occurrence of a Cash Management Trigger Event (as defined below), the related loan documents require the borrowers to set up the account for the sole and exclusive benefit of the lender into which the borrowers are required within five (5) business days to deposit or cause to be deposited all revenue generated by the Somerset Park Apartments Property. Following the occurrence of a Cash Management Trigger Event, the funds on deposit in the lockbox account are required to be transferred to the cash management account under the control of the lender. On each due date after the occurrence of a Cash Management Trigger Event, the related loan documents require that all amounts on deposit in the cash management account be applied to the payment of debt service, funding of required monthly escrows for real estate taxes, insurance premiums, replacement reserves, fees and expenses of the lockbox bank, interest accruing at the default rate, funds to be applied to the operating expenses set forth in the annual operating budget and funds sufficient to pay for extraordinary or other operating expenses not included in the approved annual budget but approved by lender, if any, which such operating expenses and extraordinary expenses will be released to a borrower-controlled account and all excess cash flow will be applied to the excess cash flow account if a Cash Sweep Event is in effect or to a borrower-controlled account if no Cash Sweep Event is in effect.

A “Cash Management Trigger Event” means the occurrence of an event of default under the Somerset Park Apartments Loan or any bankruptcy action of the borrowers, guarantors or property manager.

A “Cash Sweep Event” means the occurrence of an event of default under the Somerset Park Apartments Loan or any bankruptcy action of the borrowers, guarantors or property manager.

■ Property Management. The Somerset Park Apartments Property is currently managed by Troy Apartment Management, LLC pursuant to a management agreement. The Somerset Park Apartments Loan documents provide that the borrowers may terminate the property manager or consent to the assignment of the property manager’s rights under the management agreement, in each case, if: (i) an event of default under the Somerset Park Apartments Loan documents has occurred and is continuing; (ii) the property manager is in default under the management agreement beyond any applicable notice and cure period; (iii) the property manager becomes insolvent or a debtor in any bankruptcy action; or (iv) at any time the property manager has engaged in negligence, fraud, willful misconduct or misappropriation of funds.

■ Mezzanine or Subordinate Indebtedness. Mezzanine debt is permitted, provided that no event of default has occurred and is continuing and provided that all the following conditions have been satisfied: (i) the subordinate mezzanine loan is junior and subordinate to the Somerset Park Apartments Loan; (ii) the lender’s review and approval of the terms and conditions of the subordinate mezzanine loan and related loan documents; (iii) the aggregate loan-to-value ratio does not exceed 75%; (iv) lender has determined the existing debt and mezzanine debt have a combined debt service coverage ratio of not less than 1.25x; (v) the lender of the subordinate debt is a qualified lender and is at all times during the term of the Somerset Park Apartments Loan the sole owner and holder of the subordinate debt and will not sell, convey, mortgage, grant, bargain, encumber, pledge, assign, grant options or otherwise transfer or dispose of all or any portion of the subordinate mezzanine loan to any other person other than a qualified lender in accordance with an intercreditor agreement; (vi) all documents and instruments evidencing or securing the subordinate mezzanine loan are reasonably acceptable to lender and an intercreditor agreement acceptable to lender has been executed; (vii) the subordinate mezzanine debt (1) is non-recourse as to principal and interest required to be paid under the subordinate mezzanine loan, (2) will not have a maturity date earlier than the Somerset Park Apartments Loan and (3) is not be secured by a lien against the Somerset Park Apartments Property but will only be secured by a pledge of the direct or indirect ownership interests in the borrowers; (viii) the borrowers have paid all fees incurred in connection with the subordinate mezzanine debt; (ix) rating agency confirmation has been obtained; and (x) each of the borrowers continues to be a single purpose entity, among other conditions.

B-93

SOMERSET PARK APARTMENTS

■ Capital Improvement Plan. The related loan documents require that the borrowers complete a total of $14,576,625 of capital improvements on or before June 30, 2016. The capital improvements include but are not limited to the unit interior renovations, the addition of washers and dryers to each unit and the conversion of the two-bedroom/one bathroom units to two-bedroom/two bathroom units. Additional planned renovations include replacement of all unit windows and updates to all common hallways. Renovations are also planned for the common amenities, including updating the leasing office and activities buildings.

As described in “—Escrows” above, at origination, the borrowers reserved $26,500,000 in connection with the foregoing work.

■ Terrorism Insurance. The borrowers are required to maintain an “all-risk” insurance policy that provides coverage for terrorism in an amount equal to the full replacement cost of the Somerset Park Apartments Property, plus 18 months of business interruption coverage as calculated under the related loan documents (with an additional extended period of indemnity as reasonably required by the lender) in an amount equal to 100% of the projected gross income from the Somerset Park Apartments Property (on an actual loss sustained basis) for a period continuing until the restoration of the Somerset Park Apartments Property is completed and containing an extended period endorsement which provides for up to 12 months of additional coverage. The terrorism insurance is required to contain a deductible that is acceptable to the lender and is no larger than $25,000. See “Risk Factors—Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties” in the Prospectus Supplement.

B-94

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK )

B-95

GREYLYN BUSINESS PARK

 

B-96

GREYLYN BUSINESS PARK

 

B-97

GREYLYN BUSINESS PARK

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	1	Loan Seller		RMF
Location (City/State)	Charlotte, North Carolina	Cut-off Date Principal Balance		$35,625,000
Property Type	Industrial	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per SF		$54.95
Size (SF)	648,314	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance		3.7%
Total Occupancy as of 6/11/2015	82.6%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans		None
Owned Occupancy as of 6/11/2015	82.6%	Type of Security		Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	1965-1998 / NAP	Mortgage Rate		4.8410%
Appraised Value	$47,900,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)		120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)		360
		Original Interest Only Period (Months)		24
Underwritten Revenues	$5,065,008
Underwritten Expenses	$1,355,506	Escrows
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$3,709,502		Upfront	Monthly
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$3,404,794	Taxes	$242,903	$33,048
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio	74.4%	Insurance	$8,735	$4,159
Maturity Date LTV Ratio	63.8%	Replacement Reserves(2)	$0	$11,886
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF(1)	1.71x / 1.57x	TI/LC(3)	$1,250,000	$54,026
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	10.4% / 9.6%	Other(4)	$15,625	$0

Sources and Uses

Sources	$	%		Uses	$	%
Loan Amount	$35,625,000	73.9	%	Purchase Price	$46,000,000	95.4	%
Principal’s New Cash Contribution	7,176,716	14.9		Reserves	1,517,263	3.1
Mezzanine Loan Amount(5)	5,375,000	11.1		Closing Costs	714,453	1.5
Other Sources	55,000	0.1
Total Sources	$48,231,716	100.0	%	Total Uses	$48,231,716	100.0	%

(1) The DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF is calculated using the Greylyn Business Park Loan’s non-standard amortization schedule as set forth in Annex G to the Prospectus Supplement, and is calculated based on the aggregate debt service for the 12-month period commencing August 6, 2017.

(2) Replacement reserves are capped at $520,000.

(3) TI/LC reserves are capped at $1,250,000.

(4) Other upfront reserves represent a deferred maintenance reserve of $15,625.

(5) See “—Mezzanine or Subordinate Indebtedness” below.

■ The Mortgage Loan. The mortgage loan (the “Greylyn Business Park Loan”) is evidenced by a note in the original principal amount of $35,625,000 and is secured by a first mortgage encumbering the borrower’s fee simple interest in a 648,314 SF industrial property located in Charlotte, North Carolina (the “Greylyn Business Park Property”). The Greylyn Business Park Loan was originated by Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC on July 1, 2015 and represents approximately 3.7% of the Initial Pool Balance. The note evidencing the Greylyn Business Park Loan has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $35,625,000 and has an interest rate of 4.8410% per annum. The proceeds of the Greylyn Business Park Loan were primarily used to acquire the Greylyn Business Park Property.

The Greylyn Business Park Loan had an initial term of 120 months and has a remaining term of 118 months as of the Cut-off Date. The Greylyn Business Park Loan requires payments of interest only for the initial 24 months of its term followed by payments of principal and interest based on a 30-year amortization schedule. The scheduled maturity date of the Greylyn Business Park Loan is the due date in July 2025. Voluntary prepayment of the Greylyn Business Park Loan is permitted after the due date in January 2025. Defeasance of the Greylyn Business Park Loan with direct, non-callable obligations of the United States of America or other obligations which are “government securities” permitted under the related loan documents is permitted at any time after the second anniversary of the securitization Closing Date.

■ The Mortgaged Property. The Greylyn Business Park Property is comprised of 19 single-story industrial/flex buildings containing 648,314 SF and surface parking of 1,522 spaces located in Charlotte, North Carolina, approximately eight miles southeast of the central business district. The Greylyn Business Park Property was built in phases between 1965 and 1998. Access to the Greylyn Business Park Property is provided by Independence Boulevard (approximately 2.3 miles east of the related property), which travels in a northwest/southeast direction and connects to Interstates 77 and 85 to the northwest as well as Interstate 485 to the southeast. Interstate 485 forms Charlotte’s outer perimeter beltway and directly links to Interstates 77 and 85. The Greylyn Business Park Property predominately consists of local tenants and is comprised of 44.6% flex tenants, 39.2% industrial tenants, and 16.2% office/retail tenants. As of June 11, 2015, Total Occupancy and Owned Occupancy were both 82.6% at the Greylyn Business Park Property.

B-98

GREYLYN BUSINESS PARK

The following table presents certain information relating to the major tenants at the Greylyn Business Park Property:

Ten Largest Owned Tenants Based on Underwritten Base Rent

Tenant Name	Credit Rating (Fitch/MIS/S&P)(1)	Tenant GLA	% of Total GLA	UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent	UW Base Rent $ per SF	Lease Expiration	Renewal / Extension Options
AECOM Technology Corporation(2)	NR / Ba2 / BB	44,048	6.8%	$418,238	9.7%	$9.50	5/31/2021	2, 3-year options
Crown Point Family Physicians	NR / NR / NR	14,847	2.3	282,093	6.6	19.00	10/31/2022	NA
CT Partners II, LLC	NR / NR / NR	31,258	4.8	203,177	4.7	6.50	2/28/2019	NA
Anita Goodesign, Inc.	NR / NR / NR	22,957	3.5	187,018	4.4	8.15	12/31/2017	NA
Tax Management Associates, Inc.	NR / NR / NR	10,155	1.6	119,220	2.8	11.74	8/31/2018	NA
Sweetwater Logistics	NR / NR / NR	36,000	5.6	111,240	2.6	3.09	8/31/2019	1, 3-year option
Herff Jones, Inc.	NR / NR / NR	19,035	2.9	111,068	2.6	5.83	4/30/2018	3, 3-year options
Patterson Dental Supply, Inc.	NR / NR / NR	9,353	1.4	105,315	2.5	11.26	7/31/2015	2, 5-year options
Charlotte-Meck Police	NR / NR / NR	10,000	1.5	99,194	2.3	9.92	5/31/2023	NA
Inner Peaks, Inc.	NR / NR / NR	13,200	2.0	99,089	2.3	7.51	10/31/2019	1, 5-year option
Ten Largest Tenants		210,853	32.5%	$1,735,652	40.4%	$8.23
Remaining Tenants		324,883	50.1	2,560,566	59.6	7.88
Vacant		112,578	17.4	0	0.0	0.00
Total / Wtd. Avg. All Owned Tenants		648,314	100.0%	$4,296,219	100.0%	$8.02

(1) Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease.

(2) AECOM Technology Corporation has a one-time termination option effective on February 1, 2018, which requires (i) that written notice be given prior to August 1, 2017, (ii) that the tenant is not in default at the time of the termination notice and (iii) payment of a termination fee equal to $484,867.

The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the Greylyn Business Park Property:

Lease Expiration Schedule⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾

Year Ending December 31,	Expiring Owned GLA	% of Owned GLA	Cumulative % of Owned GLA	UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent	UW Base Rent $ per SF	# of Expiring Tenants
MTM	0	0.0%	0.0%	$0	0.0%	$0.00	0
2015	26,730	4.1	4.1%	250,041	5.8	9.35	9
2016	71,470	11.0	15.1%	556,089	12.9	7.78	22
2017	94,368	14.6	29.7%	670,974	15.6	7.11	18
2018	114,224	17.6	47.3%	965,202	22.5	8.45	22
2019	112,524	17.4	64.7%	633,635	14.7	5.63	8
2020	27,197	4.2	68.9%	203,860	4.7	7.50	5
2021	56,398	8.7	77.6%	543,273	12.6	9.63	3
2022	22,825	3.5	81.1%	373,950	8.7	16.38	3
2023	10,000	1.5	82.6%	99,194	2.3	9.92	1
2024	0	0.0	82.6%	0	0.0	0.00	0
2025	0	0.0	82.6%	0	0.0	0.00	0
2024 & Thereafter	0	0.0	82.6%	0	0.0	0.00	0
Vacant	112,578	17.4	100.0%	0	0.0	0.00	0
Total / Wtd. Avg.	648,314	100.0%		$4,296,219	100.0%	$8.02	91

(1) Calculated based on approximate square footage occupied by each Owned Tenant.

(2) Certain tenants have lease termination options that are exercisable prior to the originally stated expiration date of the applicable lease and that are not considered in the Lease Expiration Schedule.

The following table presents certain information relating to historical leasing at the Greylyn Business Park Property:

Historical Leased %⁽¹⁾

	2012	2013	2014	As of 6/11/2015
Owned Space	71.1%	73.5%	84.3%	82.6%

(1) As provided by the borrower and which reflects average occupancy for the indicated year, unless specified otherwise.

B-99

GREYLYN BUSINESS PARK

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Greylyn Business Park Property:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

	2012	2013	2014	TTM 4/15/2015	Underwritten(2)	Underwritten $ per SF
Base Rent	$3,448,330	$3,443,461	$3,758,610	$3,850,420	$4,296,219	$6.63
Contractual Rent Steps	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
Overage Rent	0	0	0	0	0	0.00
Gross Up Vacancy	0	0	0	0	1,125,227	1.74
Total Rent	$3,448,330	$3,443,461	$3,758,610	$3,850,420	$5,421,446	$8.36
Total Reimbursables	701,888	705,538	639,453	623,281	753,789	1.16
Other Income(3)	40,975	62,800	10,859	1,753	15,000	0.02
Less Vacancy & Credit Loss	0	0	0	0	(1,125,227)	(1.74)
Effective Gross Income	$4,191,193	$4,211,799	$4,408,922	$4,475,454	$5,065,008	$7.81
Total Operating Expenses	$1,364,472	$1,379,080	$1,441,133	$1,067,133	$1,355,506	$2.09
Net Operating Income	$2,826,721	$2,832,719	$2,967,789	$3,408,321	$3,709,502	$5.72
TI/LC	0	0	0	0	162,079	0.25
Capital Expenditures	0	0	0	0	142,629	0.22
Net Cash Flow	$2,826,721	$2,832,719	$2,967,789	$3,408,321	$3,404,794	$5.25

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, lease cancellation income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) Underwritten cash flow is based on contractual rents as of June 11, 2015.

(3) Other income includes forfeited deposits, after-hour utility charges and late charges.

■ Appraisal. According to the appraisal, the Greylyn Business Park Property had an “as-is” appraised value of $47,900,000 as of June 1, 2015 and is expected to have an “as stabilized” appraised value of $49,250,000 as of June 1, 2016.

■ Environmental Matters. According to a Phase I environmental report, dated May 1, 2015, there are no recommendations for further action at the Greylyn Business Park Property other than a recommendation for an asbestos operations and maintenance (O&M) plan, which is already in place.

■ Market Overview and Competition. The Greylyn Business Park Property is located within the East Submarket of the Charlotte, North Carolina market. As of the first quarter of 2015, the East Submarket contained (i) 8.4 million SF of industrial space at a vacancy level of 7.2%, with average rents of $6.71 per SF; (ii) 6.3 million SF of warehouse space at a vacancy level of 4.5%, with average rents of $4.96 per SF; and (iii) 4.6 million SF of office space at a vacancy level of 7.6%, with average rents of $14.95 per SF. According to the appraisal, the competitive set in the submarket has an weighted average occupancy rate of 91.6% excluding Crown Point Business Park and rental rates ranging from $6.50 to $10.75 per SF.

The following table presents certain information relating to certain industrial lease comparables provided in the appraisal for the Greylyn Business Park Property:

Industrial Lease Comparables⁽¹⁾

	Crown Point Business Park	Crownpoint Executive Park	Independence Point	Crews Business Center	Sardis Executive Park
Year Built	1997	1988	1992	NAV	1986
Total GLA	133,422	90,818	182,037	183,878	34,944
Total Occupancy	38%	93%	97%	84%	100%
Quoted Rent Rate per SF	$4.05	$8.50	$6.50	$9.00	$7.00
Expense Basis	Triple Net	Triple Net	Triple Net	Mod Gross	Triple Net

(1) Source: Appraisal.

B-100

GREYLYN BUSINESS PARK

The following table presents certain information relating to certain industrial sales comparables provided in the appraisal for the Greylyn Business Park Property:

Industrial Sales Comparables⁽¹⁾

Property Name	City	Sale Date	Year Built	NRA (SF)	Sale Price	Sale Price per SF	Occupancy
Shopton Ridge	Charlotte	April 2015	2007	422,400	$33,226,000	$78.66	90%
Imperial Center	Durham	February 2015	1988	187,651	$24,000,000	$127.90	76%
Coffey Creek Park	Charlotte	December 2014	2000	149,500	$13,500,000	$90.30	87%
Arrowridge I, II, III & IV	Charlotte	February 2014	1979	194,553	$11,100,000	$57.05	88%

(1) Source: Appraisal.

■ The Borrower. The borrower is Greylyn BP, LLC, a single-purpose, single-asset entity. Legal counsel to the borrower delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the Greylyn Business Park Loan. The non-recourse carveout guarantors under the Greylyn Business Park Loan are Anthony J. Asher, James A. Asher and Legacy Properties Group, Inc.

■ Escrows. On the origination date, the borrower funded aggregate reserves of $1,517,263 with respect to the Greylyn Business Park Loan, comprised of (i) $242,903 for real estate taxes, (ii) $8,735 for insurance, (iii) $1,250,000 for tenant improvements and leasing commissions and (iv) $15,625 for deferred maintenance.

On each due date, the borrower is required to fund the following reserves with respect to the Greylyn Business Park Loan: (i) a tax reserve in an amount equal to one-twelfth of the amount that the lender estimates will be necessary to pay taxes over the then succeeding 12-month period; (ii) an insurance reserve in an amount equal to one-twelfth of the amount that the lender estimates will be necessary to pay insurance premiums over the then succeeding 12-month period; (iii) a tenant improvements and leasing commissions reserve in an amount equal to $54,026, subject to a $1,250,000 cap unless (a) at any time during 2016, 2018 or 2020 the balance is less than $600,000, at which time the borrower will resume making monthly deposits until the balance exceeds the $1,250,000 cap and (b) at any other time the balance is less than $250,000, the borrower will make monthly deposits until the tenant improvement and leasing commission reserve exceeds $250,000; and (iv) a replacement reserve in an amount equal to $11,886, subject to a $520,000 cap.

■ Lockbox and Cash Management. The Greylyn Business Park Loan is structured with a hard lockbox, which is already in place, and springing cash management. The Greylyn Business Park Loan documents require the borrower to direct the tenants to pay their rents directly to a lender-controlled lockbox account. On each due date after the occurrence of a Cash Management Trigger Event (as defined below), the related loan documents require that all amounts on deposit in the lockbox account be applied to the payment of debt service and funding of required monthly escrows for real estate taxes, insurance premiums, replacement reserves and interest accruing at the default rate and, if the Greylyn Business Park Mezzanine Loan (as defined below) is outstanding, funds sufficient to pay the monthly mezzanine debt service payment. Upon the occurrence of a Cash Sweep Event (as defined below) (a) funds are required to be applied to the operating expenses set forth in the annual operating budget; (b) funds sufficient to pay for extraordinary or other operating expenses not included in the approved annual budget, if any, will be applied to a borrower-controlled account; and (c) all excess cash flow will be applied to the mezzanine lender, if the Cash Sweep Event Period was caused solely by an event of default under the Greylyn Business Park Mezzanine Loan or otherwise, to the excess cash flow account.

A “Cash Management Trigger Event” means the occurrence of an event of default under the Greylyn Business Park Loan or Greylyn Business Park Mezzanine Loan or any bankruptcy action of the borrower, guarantor or manager or a Cash Management DSCR Trigger Event (as defined below).

A “Cash Management DSCR Trigger Event” means any time the debt service coverage ratio based on the trailing 12-month period preceding the event is less than 1.15x.

B-101

GREYLYN BUSINESS PARK

A “Cash Sweep Event” means the occurrence of an event of default under the Greylyn Business Park Loan or Greylyn Business Park Mezzanine Loan (as defined below) or any bankruptcy action of the borrower, guarantor or property manager or a Cash Sweep DSCR Trigger Event (as defined below).

A “Cash Sweep DSCR Trigger Event” means any time the debt service coverage ratio based on the trailing 12-month period preceding the event is less than 1.10x.

■ Property Management. The Greylyn Business Park Property is currently managed by Weston Inc., an affiliate of the borrower, pursuant to a management agreement. The Greylyn Business Park Loan documents provide that the borrower may terminate the property manager or consent to the assignment of the property manager’s rights under the management agreement, in each case, to the extent that (i) no event of default under the Greylyn Business Park Loan documents has occurred and is continuing; (ii) the property manager is in default under the management agreement beyond any applicable notice and cure period; (iii) the property manager becomes insolvent or a debtor in any bankruptcy action; or (iv) at any time the property manager has engaged in negligence, fraud, willful misconduct or misappropriation of funds.

■ Mezzanine or Subordinate Indebtedness. As of August 12, 2015, RMezz Greylyn BP, LLC (an affiliate of Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC) is the holder of a mezzanine loan (originally made by Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC on July 1, 2015) in the original amount of $5,375,000 (the “Greylyn Business Park Mezzanine Loan”) from Greylyn Mezz, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that directly owns 100.0% of the Greylyn Business Park Loan borrower. The Greylyn Business Park Mezzanine Loan has an interest rate of 12.003605% per annum and requires payments of interest-only for the initial 24 months of its term and then payments of principal and interest based on a 30-year amortization schedule. The Greylyn Business Park Mezzanine Loan matures on July 6, 2025.

■ Terrorism Insurance. The borrower is required to maintain an “all-risk” insurance policy that provides coverage for terrorism in an amount equal to the full replacement cost of the Greylyn Business Park Property, plus 18 months of business interruption coverage as calculated under the related loan documents (with an additional extended period of indemnity as reasonably required by the lender) in an amount equal to 100% of the projected gross income from the Greylyn Business Park Property (on an actual loss sustained basis) for a period continuing until the restoration of the Greylyn Business Park Property is completed and containing an extended period endorsement which provides for up to 12 months of additional coverage. The terrorism insurance is required to contain a deductible that is acceptable to the lender and is no larger than $25,000. See “Risk Factors—Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties” in the Prospectus Supplement.

B-102

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

B-103

Pavilion Jenkintown

B-104

Pavilion Jenkintown

B-105

Pavilion Jenkintown

B-106

Pavilion Jenkintown

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	1	Loan Seller		GSMC
Location (City/State)	Jenkintown, Pennsylvania	Cut-off Date Principal Balance		$31,230,786
Property Type	Mixed Use	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per SF		$86.79
Size (SF)	359,826	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance		3.3%
Total Occupancy as of 6/1/2015	81.2%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans		None
Owned Occupancy as of 6/1/2015	81.2%	Type of Security		Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	1967 / 2010, 2012	Mortgage Rate		4.2705%
Appraised Value	$47,100,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)		120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)		360
		Original Interest Only Period (Months)		NAP
Underwritten Revenues	$6,486,175
Underwritten Expenses	$3,139,046	Escrows
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$3,347,129		Upfront	Monthly
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$3,007,570	Taxes	$0	$63,522
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio	66.3%	Insurance	$0	$0
Maturity Date LTV Ratio(1)	51.2%	Replacement Reserves	$0	$0
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	1.81x / 1.63x	TI/LC(2)	$250,000	$0
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	10.7% / 9.6%	Other(3)	$552,052	$0

Sources and Uses
Sources	$	%	Uses	$	%
Loan Amount	$31,270,000	100.0%	Loan Payoff	$26,341,388	84.2%
			Principal Equity Distribution	3,218,290	10.3
			Closing Costs	908,270	2.9
			Reserves	802,052	2.6
Total Sources	$31,270,000	100.0%	Total Uses	$31,270,000	100.0%

(1) The Maturity Date LTV Ratio is calculated utilizing the “as stabilized” appraised value of $49,000,000. The Maturity Date LTV Ratio calculated on the basis of the “as-is” appraised value is 53.3%. See “—Appraisal” below.

(2) TI/LC upfront reserve was funded to the cap of $250,000. The borrower is required to make monthly reserves for TI/LC at a rate of $10,417 funded per month up to a cap of $250,000. See “—Escrows” below.

(3) Other upfront reserve represents a deferred maintenance reserve ($497,885) and an unfunded obligation reserve ($54,167) related to a free rent period for the Sarah Care tenant. See “—Escrows” below.

■ The Mortgage Loan. The mortgage loan (the “Pavilion Jenkintown Loan”) is evidenced by a note in the original principal amount of $31,270,000 and is secured by a first mortgage encumbering the borrower’s fee simple interest in a mixed use property located in Jenkintown, Pennsylvania (the “Pavilion Jenkintown Property”). The Pavilion Jenkintown Loan was originated by Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company on August 4, 2015 and represents approximately 3.3% of the Initial Pool Balance. The note evidencing the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $31,230,786 and an interest rate of 4.2705% per annum. The borrower utilized the proceeds of the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan to refinance existing debt on the Pavilion Jenkintown Property, fund reserves, pay origination costs and return equity to the borrower sponsor.

The Pavilion Jenkintown Loan had an initial term of 120 months and has a remaining term of 119 months as of the Cut-off Date. The Pavilion Jenkintown Loan requires monthly payments of interest and principal sufficient to amortize the loan over a 30-year amortization schedule. The scheduled maturity date of the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan is the due date in August 2025. Voluntary prepayment of the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan is prohibited prior to the due date in May 2025. Provided that no event of default under the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan is continuing, defeasance with direct, non-callable obligations of the United States of America is permitted at any time on or after the first due date following the second anniversary of the securitization Closing Date.

■ The Mortgaged Property. The Pavilion Jenkintown Property is a 359,826 SF mixed use property located in Jenkintown, Pennsylvania. The Pavilion Jenkintown Property is comprised of approximately 56.4% office, 26.2% retail, 8.1% medical office, 5.3% building storage and 4.0% self-storage space. The Pavilion Jenkintown Property is located at the intersection of Old York Road (State Route 611) and Wyncote Road/Pavilion Road. Old York Road is a major north-south thoroughfare providing access from the Philadelphia central business district to the northern suburbs with an average vehicle count of 24,000 vehicles per day.

The Pavilion Jenkintown Property was built in 1967, purchased by the borrower sponsor in 1995 and renovated in 2010 and 2012. An affiliate of the borrower sponsor formerly had a ground lease interest in the Pavilion Jenkintown Property and the borrower purchased the fee interest in 2009 for approximately $2.6 million. A

B-107

Pavilion Jenkintown

condominium structure is in place at the Pavilion Jenkintown Property. The Pavilion Jenkintown Property consists of one unit within an eight-unit condominium regime.  The related borrower controls 11.326% of the voting rights of the condominium. The Pavilion Jenkintown Property is part of a larger overall development that includes a 224-unit luxury apartment building (The Plaza Apartments) and a retail center (The Shops at Pavilion Jenkintown) which includes Acme, Burlington Coat Factory and Applebee’s. As of June 1, 2015, Total Occupancy and Owned Occupancy at the Pavilion Jenkintown Property were both 81.2%.

The following table presents certain information relating to the tenants (of which, certain tenants may have co-tenancy provisions) at the Pavilion Jenkintown Property:

Ten Largest Tenants Based on Underwritten Base Rent

Tenant Name	Credit Rating (Fitch/MIS/S&P)(1)	Tenant GLA	% of Total GLA		UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent		UW Base Rent $ per SF	Lease Expiration	Renewal / Extension Options
PA Heart & Vascular	NR / NR / NR	12,050	3.3	%	$314,628	5.6	%	$26.11	8/31/2017	2, 5-year renewal options
Department of Correction	AA- / Aa3 / AA-	9,490	2.6		209,265	3.7		22.05	10/31/2019	2, 5-year renewal options
G3 of PA LLC	NR / NR / NR	8,703	2.4		180,587	3.2		20.75	11/30/2018	NA
Sarah Care	NR / NR / NR	12,500	3.5		162,500	2.9		13.00	11/30/2025	2, 5-year renewal options
Shor/Levin/Plotnick	NR / NR / NR	8,758	2.4		159,367	2.9		18.20	(2)	NA
Pediatric Care Group	NR / NR / NR	6,133	1.7		147,192	2.6		24.00	10/31/2016	NA
Goodway Group	NR / NR / NR	7,250	2.0		138,467	2.5		19.10	(3)	NA
Security Assoc	NR / NR / NR	7,047	2.0		138,403	2.5		19.64	1/31/2018	NA
Temple Physicians(4)	NR / NR / NR	4,133	1.1		130,190	2.3		31.50	3/31/2023	2, 5-year renewal options
Hibachi	NR / NR / NR	7,017	2.0		124,201	2.2		17.70	4/30/2016	NA
Ten Largest Tenants		83,081	23.1	%	$1,704,800	30.5	%	$20.52
Remaining Tenants		208,994	58.1		3,881,813	69.5		18.57
Vacant		67,751	18.8		0	0.0		0.00
Total / Wtd. Avg. Tenants		359,826	100.0	%	$5,586,614	100.0	%	$19.13

(1) Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease.

(2) Shor/Levin/Plotnick has two separate lease expirations, including 8,458 SF of space ($18.46 UW Base Rent per SF) expiring on December 31, 2018 and 300 SF of space ($10.80 UW Base Rent per SF) leased on a month-to-month basis.

(3) Goodway Group has two separate lease expirations, including 6,658 SF of space ($19.95 UW Base Rent per SF) expiring on November 30, 2015 and 592 SF of space ($9.53 UW Base Rent per SF) leased on a month-to-month basis.

(4) Temple Physicians has the right to terminate its lease on April 30, 2018 and April 30, 2020.

The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the Pavilion Jenkintown Property based on initial lease expiration dates:

Lease Expiration Schedule⁽¹⁾

Year Ending	Expiring Owned	% of Owned		Cumulative % of	UW	% of Total UW		UW Base Rent	# of Expiring
December 31,	GLA	GLA		Owned GLA	Base Rent	Base Rent		$ per SF	Tenants
MTM	18,873	5.2	%	5.2%	$252,290	4.5	%	$13.37	31
2015	25,456	7.1		12.3%	517,211	9.3		20.32	27
2016	61,280	17.0		29.4%	1,117,559	20.0		18.24	43
2017	32,898	9.1		38.5%	779,607	14.0		23.70	16
2018	56,558	15.7		54.2%	980,994	17.6		17.34	18
2019	33,834	9.4		63.6%	743,792	13.3		21.98	15
2020	18,809	5.2		68.8%	384,253	6.9		20.43	9
2021	7,003	1.9		70.8%	166,539	3.0		23.78	3
2022	8,209	2.3		73.1%	139,821	2.5		17.03	2
2023	4,133	1.1		74.2%	130,190	2.3		31.50	1
2024	0	0.0		74.2%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2025	17,245	4.8		79.0%	257,702	4.6		14.94	4
2026 & Thereafter	7,777	2.2		81.2%	116,655	2.1		15.00	1
Vacant	67,751	18.8		100.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
Total / Wtd. Avg.	359,826	100.0	%		$5,586,614	100.0	%	$19.13	170

(1) Calculated based on approximate square footage occupied by each tenant.

B-108

Pavilion Jenkintown

The following table presents certain information relating to historical occupancy at the Pavilion Jenkintown Property:

Historical Leased %⁽¹⁾

2012	2013	2014	As of 6/1/2015
80.7%	78.7%	79.0%	81.2%

(1) As provided by the borrower and which reflects occupancy for the indicated year unless specified otherwise.

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Pavilion Jenkintown Property:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

	2013	2014	TTM 4/30/2015	Underwritten(2)		Underwritten $ per SF
Base Rent	$5,251,726	$5,305,120	$5,335,933	$5,586,614		$15.53
Gross Up Vacancy	0	0	0	1,350,560		3.75
Total Rent	$5,251,726	$5,305,120	$5,335,933	$6,937,174		$19.28
Total Reimbursables	411,181	352,424	466,941	477,747		1.33
Other Revenue	490,104	416,017	421,814	421,814		1.17
Less Vacancy & Credit Loss	0	0	0	(1,350,560	)	(3.75	)
Effective Gross Income	$6,153,011	$6,073,561	$6,224,688	$6,486,175		$18.03
Total Operating Expenses	$2,911,921	$3,113,779	$3,147,351	$3,139,046		$8.72
Net Operating Income	$3,241,090	$2,959,782	$3,077,337	$3,347,129		$9.30
TI/LC	0	0	0	267,594		0.74
Capital Expenditures	0	0	0	71,965		0.20
Net Cash Flow	$3,241,090	$2,959,782	$3,077,337	$3,007,570		$8.36

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, lease cancellation income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) The increase in effective gross income is mainly attributed to the new leases with Sarah Care and Premium Advertising, which will increase the base rental revenue of the Pavilion Jenkintown Property $219,680 annually.

■ Appraisal. According to the appraisal, the Pavilion Jenkintown Property had an “as-is” appraised value of $47,100,000 as of June 10, 2015 and an “as stabilized” appraised value of $49,000,000 as of November 1, 2016, which assumes an occupancy level of 88.5%.

■ Environmental Matters. According to a Phase I environmental report, dated June 25, 2015, there are no recognized environmental conditions or recommendations for further action at the Pavilion Jenkintown Property other than the recommendation for an asbestos operations and maintenance (O&M) plan.

■ Market Overview and Competition. The Pavilion Jenkintown Property is located in an infill, fully developed site with several office complexes, multifamily buildings and retail establishments nearby. Local retail and personal services include several freestanding stores, pharmacies, convenience stores and two regional malls (Cheltenham and Willow Grove). The area is within 25 miles of the Lower Bucks County, Plymouth Meeting and King of Prussia submarkets. Access to employment centers in other submarkets is a major demand driver.

The Pavilion Jenkintown Property is located in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, which is the third most populous county in the state of Pennsylvania and the 51st wealthiest county in the United States. As of 2015, the population within a 3-mile radius is approximately 167,865 with a median household income of $57,603.

The Pavilion Jenkintown Property and the surrounding development offers on-site amenities, including restaurants, hair salons, day spa, banking, dry cleaner, newsstand and a U.S. post office. In addition to the on-site retail, the development surrounding the Pavilion Jenkintown Property offers an outdoor courtyard, ample street and garage parking and proximity to an adjacent Acme grocery store.

B-109

Pavilion Jenkintown

The following table presents certain information relating to certain office lease comparables provided in the appraisal for the Pavilion Jenkintown Property:

Office Lease Comparables⁽¹⁾ 

	Pavilion Jenkintown	Jenkintown Plaza	One & Two Pitcairn Place	One & Two Pitcairn Place	101 West Avenue	Piazza at Jenkintown
Year Built / Latest Renovation	1967 /2010, 2012	1968 / NA	1985 / NA	1985 / NA	1989 / NA	1920 / NA
Total GLA	359,826	99,815	102,194	102,194	96,049	44,873
Total Occupancy	81.2%	NAV	NAV	NAV	NAV	NAV
Rent Rate per SF	$19.13	$16.75	$21.00	$23.50	$19.00	$19.22
Expense Basis	Base Year/Triple Net	Full Service + TE	Full Service + TE	Full Service + TE	Full Service + TE	Full Service + TE

(1) Source: Appraisal.

The following table presents certain information relating to certain office sales comparables provided in the appraisal for Pavilion Jenkintown Property:

Office Sales Comparables⁽¹⁾

Property Name	Location	Sale Date	GLA (SF)	Sale Price	Sale Price per SF	Total Occupancy
Four Falls 100 & 200	West Conshohocken, PA	January 2014	253,985	$43,500,000	$171.27	76.0%
16 & 18 Sentry Park West	Blue Bell, PA	May 2013	192,631	$19,275,000	$100.06	82.0%
Atwater Corporate Center	Malvern, PA	November 2014	151,447	$23,000,000	$151.87	74.0%
Valleybrooke Corporate Center	Malvern, PA	October 2014	279,934	$37,900,000	$135.39	100.0%
Highview I & II at Providence Corporate Center	Collegeville, PA	March 2013	183,363	$33,000,000	$179.97	NAV

(1) Source: Appraisal.

■ The Borrower. The borrower is Pavilion Unit Acquisition LP, a single-purpose, single-asset entity. Legal counsel to the borrower delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan. Arnold Galman, an indirect owner of the borrower, is the non-recourse carveout guarantor under the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan.

Mr. Galman is the founder and President of The Galman Group (“TGG”). TGG is a commercial real estate firm founded in 1980 and based in Philadelphia. As of August 2015, TGG has a portfolio of approximately 53 multifamily, retail and office properties. TGG corporate offices are located at the Pavilion Jenkintown Property.

■ Escrows. On the origination date, the borrower funded (i) a tenant improvements and leasing commissions reserve of $250,000, (ii) a deferred maintenance reserve of $497,885 related to, among other things, replacement of a fire alarm system, and (iii) an unfunded obligations reserve of $54,167 related to a free rent period for the Sarah Care tenant.

On each due date, the borrower is required to fund: (i) a tax and insurance reserve in an amount equal to one-twelfth of the amount that the lender reasonably estimates will be necessary to pay taxes and insurance premiums over the then succeeding 12-month period; provided, however, that reserve deposits for insurance premiums are not required if the borrower is maintaining a blanket policy in accordance with the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan documents and there is no continuing event of default; and (ii) a tenant improvements and leasing commissions reserve in the amount of $10,417 (subject to a cap of $250,000, excluding termination fees). The tenant improvements and leasing commissions reserve was funded to the $250,000 cap at origination of the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan.

In addition, on each due date during the continuance of a Pavilion Jenkintown Trigger Period, the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan documents require an excess cash reserve as discussed under “—Lockbox and Cash Management” below.

B-110

Pavilion Jenkintown

A “Pavilion Jenkintown Trigger Period” means any period (i) commencing upon the debt service coverage ratio (as calculated under the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan documents) for the trailing 12-month period (as of the last day of any fiscal quarter) being 1.15x or less (unless the borrower deposits $275,000 into the excess reserve within 10 business days after a Pavilion Jenkintown Trigger Period would have commenced and each yearly anniversary thereafter such that the debt service coverage ratio is 1.15x or less) and ending at the conclusion of the second consecutive fiscal quarter for which the debt service coverage ratio is greater than 1.15x, and (ii) commencing upon the borrower’s failure to deliver monthly, quarterly or annual financial reports and ending when such reports are delivered and indicate that no other Pavilion Jenkintown Trigger Period is ongoing.

■ Lockbox and Cash Management. The Pavilion Jenkintown Loan is structured with a springing lockbox and springing cash management. Upon the occurrence of a Pavilion Jenkintown Trigger Period or event of default under the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan, the related loan documents require the borrower to deliver notices to each tenant instructing them to remit all rents into a lender-controlled lockbox account and require that all cash revenues relating to the Pavilion Jenkintown Property and all other money received by the borrower or the property manager with respect to the Pavilion Jenkintown Property (other than tenant security deposits) be deposited into such lockbox account or the cash management account within one business day following receipt, in each case only during the continuance of such Pavilion Jenkintown Trigger Period or event of default under the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan. On each business day during the continuance of a Pavilion Jenkintown Trigger Period or an event of default under the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan, all amounts in the lockbox account are required to be remitted to a lender-controlled cash management account.

On each due date during the continuance of a Pavilion Jenkintown Trigger Period or, at the lender’s discretion, during an event of default under the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan, the related loan documents require that all amounts on deposit in the cash management account be used to pay debt service, required reserves and budgeted operating expenses, and that all remaining amounts be reserved in an excess cash flow reserve account. To the extent any Pavilion Jenkintown Trigger Period expires or an event of default under the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan is cured, all funds in the cash management account are required to be swept into a borrower-controlled operating account. During the continuance of an event of default under the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan, the lender may apply all funds on deposit in any of the accounts constituting collateral for the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan to amounts payable under the related loan documents and/or toward the payment of expenses of the Pavilion Jenkintown Property, in such order of priority as the lender may determine.

■ Property Management. The Pavilion Jenkintown Property is managed by The Galman Group pursuant to a management agreement. Under the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan documents, the Pavilion Jenkintown Property is required to remain managed by The Galman Group or any other management company approved by the lender and with respect to which Rating Agency Confirmation has been received. The lender has the right to replace, or require the borrower to replace, the property manager with a property manager selected by the lender (i) during the continuance of an event of default under the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan, (ii) following any foreclosure, conveyance in lieu of foreclosure or other similar transaction, (iii) if the property manager files for or is the subject of a petition in bankruptcy or (iv) if a trustee or receiver is appointed for the property manager’s assets or the property manager makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors or is adjudicated insolvent.

■ Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.

B-111

Pavilion Jenkintown

■ Terrorism Insurance. So long as TRIPRA or a similar or subsequent statute is in effect, the borrower is required to maintain terrorism insurance for foreign and domestic acts (as those terms are defined in TRIPRA or a similar or subsequent statute) in an amount equal to the full replacement cost of the Pavilion Jenkintown Property (plus 18 months of rental loss and/or business interruption coverage plus an additional period of indemnity covering the 12 months following restoration). If TRIPRA or a similar or subsequent statute is not in effect, then provided that terrorism insurance is commercially available, the borrower is required to carry terrorism insurance throughout the term of the Pavilion Jenkintown Loan as described in the preceding sentence, but in that event the borrower is not required to spend more than two times the amount of the insurance premium that is payable at that time in respect of the property and business interruption/rental loss insurance required under the related loan documents (without giving effect to the cost of terrorism and earthquake components of such property and business interruption/rental loss insurance). If the cost of terrorism insurance exceeds such amount, then the borrower will be required to purchase the maximum amount of terrorism insurance available with funds equal to such amount. In either such case, terrorism insurance may not have a deductible in excess of $50,000. The required terrorism insurance may be included in a blanket policy, provided that the borrower provides evidence satisfactory to the lender that the insurance premiums for the Pavilion Jenkintown Property are separately allocated to the Pavilion Jenkintown Property and that the policy will provide the same protection as a separate policy. See “Risk Factors—Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties” in the Prospectus Supplement.

B-112

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

B-113

UNIVERSITY PLACE

 

B-114

UNIVERSITY PLACE

 

B-115

UNIVERSITY PLACE

 

B-116

UNIVERSITY PLACE

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	1	Loan Seller		CGMRC
Location (City/State)	Carbondale, Illinois	Cut-off Date Principal Balance		$28,000,000
Property Type	Retail	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per SF		$111.93
Size (SF)(1)	250,159	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance		2.9%
Total Occupancy as of 6/10/2015	90.9%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans		None
Owned Occupancy as of 6/10/2015	90.9%	Type of Security		Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	1974, 1989, 2010 / 2010	Mortgage Rate		4.4200%
Appraised Value	$37,700,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)		120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)		360
		Original Interest Only Term (Months)		60
Underwritten Revenues	$3,878,502
Underwritten Expenses	$1,022,477	Escrows
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$2,856,026		Upfront	Monthly
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$2,555,211	Taxes	$581,747	$48,479
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio	74.3%	Insurance	$0	$0
Maturity Date LTV Ratio	67.9%	Replacement Reserve(2)	$0	$3,941
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	1.69x / 1.52x	TI/LC(3)	$0	$10,948
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	10.2% / 9.1%	Other(4)	$4,016,170	$0

Sources and Uses
Sources	$	%	Uses	$	%
Loan Amount	$28,000,000	96.2%	Loan Payoff	$24,057,259	82.6%
Principal’s New Cash Contribution	1,017,744	3.5	Reserves	4,597,917	15.8
Other Sources	90,000	0.3	Closing Costs	452,567	1.6
Total Sources	$29,107,744	100.0%	Total Uses	$29,107,744	100.0%

(1) Excludes the net rentable area of six ground leased outparcels.

(2) The Replacement Reserve is capped at $141,891. See “—Escrows” below.

(3) The TI/LC reserve is capped at $262,759. See “—Escrows” below.

(4) Other upfront reserves represent (i) $2,088,970 for unfunded obligations, (ii) a $1,700,000 holdback in connection with American Multi-Cinema’s (“AMC”) termination right, (iii) $216,575 for gap rent and (iv) $10,625 for deferred maintenance at the University Place Property. See “—Escrows” below.

■ The Mortgage Loan. The mortgage loan (the “University Place Loan”) is evidenced by a note in the original principal amount of $28,000,000 and is secured by a first mortgage encumbering the borrower’s fee simple interest in a retail center and six outparcels ground leased to tenants located in Carbondale, Illinois (the “University Place Property”). The University Place Loan was originated by Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. on August 11, 2015 and represents approximately 2.9% of the Initial Pool Balance. The note evidencing the University Place Loan has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $28,000,000 and an interest rate of 4.4200% per annum. The proceeds of the University Place Loan were primarily used to refinance the existing debt on the University Place Property, fund reserves and pay origination costs.

The University Place Loan had an initial term of 120 months and has a remaining term of 120 months as of the Cut-off Date. The University Place Loan requires monthly payments of interest only for the initial 60 months, followed by monthly payments of principal and interest based on a 30-year amortization schedule. The scheduled maturity date of the University Place Loan is the due date in September 2025. At any time after the second anniversary of the securitization Closing Date, the University Place Loan may be defeased with certain direct non-callable obligations of the United States of America or other obligations which are “government securities” permitted under the University Place Loan documents. Voluntary prepayment of the University Place Loan is permitted on or after the due date occurring in June 2025 without payment of a prepayment premium.

■ The Mortgaged Property. The University Place Property is comprised of a 250,159 SF anchored retail center and six outparcels ground leased to tenants located in Carbondale, Illinois. The University Place Property was constructed in stages between 1974, 1989 and 2010, with the buildings constructed in 1974 and 1989 undergoing renovations in 2010. The University Place Property consists of nine, single-story buildings situated on eight parcels totaling approximately 37.8 acres. The University Place Property is anchored by Dick’s Sporting Goods, AMC and Best Buy, with other large tenants including TJ Maxx, Party City, Petco and Verizon Wireless. There are six ground leased outparcel tenants at the University Place Property which are McDonald’s, Chili’s Grill & Bar, ALDI Supermarket, AT&T, Arby’s and McAlister’s Deli. The six ground leased outparcel tenants contribute 13.0% of Underwritten Base Rent. As of June 10, 2015, Total Occupancy and Owned Occupancy for the University Place Property were both 90.9%.

B-117

UNIVERSITY PLACE

The following table presents certain information relating to the major tenants at the University Place Property:

Ten Largest Tenants Based on Underwritten Base Rent

Tenant Name	Credit Rating (Fitch/MIS/S&P)(1)	Tenant GLA	% of GLA	UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent	UW Base Rent $ per SF	Lease Expiration	Tenant Sales $ per SF/Screen(2)	Occupancy Cost	Renewal / Extension Options
Dick’s Sporting Goods(3)	NR / NR / NR	45,000	18.0%	$472,500	15.4%	$10.50	1/31/2018	$196	6.5%	4, 5-year options
Best Buy	BB / Baa2 / BB+	30,000	12.0	337,500	11.0	$11.25	1/31/2018	NA	NA	2, 5-year options
AMC (4)(5)	NR / B2 / B+	31,088	12.4	312,123	10.1	$10.04	8/31/2030	$140,480	35.7%	3, 5-year options
Party City(6)	NR / NR / NR	14,612	5.8	208,952	6.8	$14.30	1/31/2021	$95	17.7%	2, 5-year options
Petco Supplies & Fish(7)	NR / B3 / B	15,000	6.0	195,000	6.3	$13.00	8/30/2016	NA	NA	3, 5-year options
TJ Maxx(8)	NR / A3 / A+	24,568	9.8	192,000	6.2	$7.82	11/30/2020	$281	3.4%	4, 5-year options
Verizon Wireless	A- / Baa1 / BBB+	5,000	2.0	146,302	4.8	$29.26	12/31/2026	NA	NA	2, 5-year options
Five Below Inc.	NR / NR / NR	7,900	3.2	126,400	4.1	$16.00	6/30/2025	NA	NA	2, 5-year options
Kirkland’s	NR / NR / NR	7,872	3.1	125,952	4.1	$16.00	7/31/2022	$128	14.9%	2, 5-year options
Shoe Carnival	NR / NR / NR	11,848	4.7	118,480	3.9	$10.00	1/31/2018	$257	5.1%	1, 5-year option
Ten Largest Tenants		192,888	77.1%	$2,235,209	72.6%	$11.59
Remaining Tenants		34,577	13.8	841,900	27.4	24.35
Vacant		22,694	9.1	0	0.0	0.00
Total / Wtd. Avg. All Tenants		250,159	100.0%	$3,077,109	100.0%	$13.53

(1) Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease.

(2) Sales figures for Dick’s Sporting Goods and AMC are for the year ending December 31, 2013. Sales figures for all other tenants are for the year ending December 31, 2014.

(3) Dick’s Sporting Goods has the option to pay reduced rent if 60% of the leasable floor area (excluding the demised premises and outparcels) is not open and continuously operating by certain tenants for more than 180 days, and to terminate its lease if the failure continues for 18 months following the initial 180 day period.

(4) In connection with renovations to take place within its space, AMC has the right to terminate its lease if it is unable to obtain proper permits or approval from the applicable government authority within the 120 day period following the date AMC submits its remodeling work to the applicable government authority.

(5) There are eight screens at the AMC space.

(6) Party City has the option to terminate its lease within 60 days following January 31, 2016, upon six months’ notice, if annual gross sales are less than $1.7 million in the lease years ending in 2014, 2015, or 2016. Sales for Party City in 2014 were $1,392,816.

(7) Petco may pay reduced rent if certain tenants go dark for greater than 60 days during the same period of time, and may terminate with 30 days’ notice within 90 days following expiration of the 18 month period if the borrower is unable to lease at least 75% of the dark premises during the 18-month period.

(8) TJ Maxx has the option to terminate its lease within 60 days following the fifth anniversary of the lease commencement date, upon 90 days’ notice and payment of a termination fee if annual gross sales are less than $5.0 million during any of the first five years of its lease beginning on November 14, 2010. Sales for TJ Maxx in 2014 were $6,740,153.

The following table presents the lease rollover schedule at the University Place Property, based on initial lease expiration dates:

Lease Expiration Schedule⁽¹⁾

Year Ending December 31,	Expiring Owned GLA	% of Owned GLA	Cumulative % of Owned GLA	UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent	UW Base Rent $ per SF	# of Expiring Tenants
MTM	0	0.0%	0.00%	$0	0.0%	$0.00	0
2015	0	0.0	0.0%	0	0.0	$0.00	0
2016	18,335	7.3	7.3%	259,791	8.4	$14.17	3
2017(2)	0	0.0	7.3%	67,227	2.2	NAP	2
2018	102,292	40.9	48.2%	1,077,308	35.0	$10.53	6
2019(2)	0	0.0	48.2%	100,000	3.2	NAP	1
2020(2)	36,430	14.6	62.8%	446,680	14.5	$9.46	6
2021	14,612	5.8	68.6%	208,952	6.8	$14.30	1
2022	7,872	3.1	71.8%	125,952	4.1	$16.00	1
2023(2)	3,936	1.6	73.3%	130,056	4.2	$19.32	4
2024	0	0.0	73.3%	0	0.0	$0.00	0
2025(2)	7,900	3.2	76.5%	202,720	6.6	$16.00	2
2026 & Thereafter	36,088	14.4	90.9%	458,425	14.9	$12.70	2
Vacant	22,694	9.1	100.0%	0	0.0	$0.00	0
Total / Wtd. Avg.	250,159	100.0%		$3,077,109	100.0%	$13.53	28

(1) Calculated based on approximate square footage occupied by each Owned Tenant unless otherwise specified.

(2) There are six ground lease tenants at the University Place Property. The ground leased tenants are (i) McDonald’s, with a lease expiration date in 2017, (ii) Arby’s, with a lease expiration date in 2017, (iii) ALDI Supermarket, with a lease expiration date in 2019, (iv) AT&T, with a lease expiration date in 2020, (v) McAlister’s Deli, with a lease expiration date in 2023 and (vi) Chili’s Grill & Bar, with a lease expiration date in 2025. For all six ground lease tenants, the borrower owns the land and each tenant owns its respective improvements. For purposes of this rollover schedule the UW Base Rent for each tenant is included in its respective lease expiration year and the GLA attributable to each tenant’s space is presented as 0 in its respective lease expiration year. Rent for the six ground leased tenants is not included for purposes of calculating UW Base Rent $ per SF in the above table.

B-118

UNIVERSITY PLACE

The following table presents certain information relating to historical leasing at the University Place Property:

Historical Leased %⁽¹⁾

	2012	2013	2014	As of 6/10/2015
Owned Space	93.7	92.7%	88.6%	90.9%

(1) As provided by the borrower and which represents occupancy as of December 31 for the indicated year unless otherwise specified.

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the University Place Property:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

	2012	2013	2014	Underwritten	Underwritten $ per SF
Base Rent	$2,782,726	$2,718,387	$2,786,294	$2,828,249	$11.31
Contractual Rent Steps(2)	0	0	0	248,860	0.99
Gross Up Vacancy	0	0	0	526,487	2.10
Total Rent	$2,782,726	$2,718,387	$2,786,294	$3,603,596	$14.41
Total Reimbursables	615,901	759,283	687,724	791,883	3.17
Other Income	41,851	11,012	9,511	9,511	0.04
Vacancy & Credit Loss	0	0	0	(526,487)	(2.10)
Effective Gross Income	$3,440,478	$3,488,682	$3,483,528	$3,878,502	$15.50
Real Estate Taxes	$509,642	$531,583	$540,054	$564,802	$2.26
Insurance	35,446	46,011	47,600	39,564	0.16
Management Fee	133,701	135,784	140,538	155,140	0.62
Other Operating Expenses	217,969	214,060	283,936	262,970	1.05
Total Operating Expenses	$896,757	$927,437	$1,012,127	$1,022,477	$4.09
Net Operating Income	$2,543,721	$2,561,245	$2,471,401	$2,856,026	$11.42
TI/LC	0	0	0	253,518	1.01
Replacement Reserves	0	0	0	47,297	0.19
Net Cash Flow	$2,543,721	$2,561,245	$2,471,401	$2,555,211	$10.21

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, lease cancellation income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) Contractual rent steps of $248,860 represent the present value of rent increases occurring during the loan term for Sherwin Williams ($5,208) and rent increases occurring through January 1, 2016 ($243,652).

■ Appraisal. According to the appraisal, the University Place Property had an “as-is” appraised value of $37,700,000 as of April 7, 2015.

■ Environmental Matters. Based on a Phase I environmental report dated April 9, 2015, the environmental consultant did not identify evidence of a recognized environmental condition and recommended no further action other than the institution of an operations and maintenance plan for asbestos, which was in place at origination of the University Place Loan. 

■ Market Overview and Competition. The University Place Property is an anchored retail shopping center located along Route 13 in Carbondale, Illinois. The University Place Property is located in the Carbondale-Marion MSA, approximately three miles northeast of Southern Illinois University and 96 miles southeast of St. Louis, Missouri. Southern Illinois University, with nearly 20,000 students and over 7,000 staff members, is the primary economic driver of the local economy. As a major public research university, Southern Illinois University offers more than 200 academic degree programs across the associate, bachelors, masters and doctoral levels of education. Other than Southern Illinois University, only one other business (Memorial Hospital of Carbondale) employs more than 1,000 people in the Carbondale-Marion MSA.

According to a third-party report, the University Place Property is part of the Jackson County submarket of Illinois. As of the fourth quarter of 2014, the Jackson County submarket contained approximately 2.7 million SF of retail space and exhibited a vacancy rate of 6.6%. There has been minimal new supply in the Jackson County submarket with only 7,000 SF comparable of retail space being constructed since the beginning of 2010. Asking

B-119

UNIVERSITY PLACE

rents in the Jackson County submarket increased 3.5% during 2014, from $13.21 per SF as of the first quarter of 2014 to $13.67 per SF as of the fourth quarter of 2014.

The appraisal did not identify a competitive dataset as the University Place Property and the regional mall across the street from the University Place Property are the main retail centers in Jackson County and there are no significant competitors in the immediate area.

■ The Borrower. The borrower is University Place Improvements Owner LLC, a single-purpose, single-asset Delaware limited liability company. Legal counsel to the borrower delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the University Place Loan. The non-recourse carveout guarantor for the University Place Loan is Adam W. Ifshin who is the President and CEO of DLC Management Corporation. Adam Ifshin co-founded DLC Management Corporation in 1991. DLC Management Corporation is a national owner and operator of commercial real estate, with a focus on open-air retail space. The firm currently operates a portfolio of 104 assets totaling 16.6 million SF.

■ Escrows. In connection with the origination of the University Place Loan, the borrower funded aggregate reserves of $4,597,917 with respect to the University Place Property, comprised of: (i) $581,747 for real estate taxes; (ii) $2,088,970 for unfunded obligations, primarily for the AMC space; (iii) a $1,700,000 holdback (the “AMC Holdback”) to be disbursed either (a) in full, upon lender’s receipt of evidence that AMC’s lease termination option has expired and the AMC lease is in full force and effect or (b) in the event that AMC exercises its lease termination option, in incremental disbursements equal to the amount (if any) by which a notional loan amount (calculated based upon the net cash flow of the University Place Property divided by 9%) exceeds a baseline loan amount of $26,300,000 plus any prior disbursements of the AMC Holdback funds, provided that the borrower will not be entitled to disbursement of any portion of the AMC Holdback after the third anniversary of the origination of the University Place Loan; (iv) $216,575 for gap rent at the University Place Property; and (v) $10,625 for deferred maintenance costs at the University Place Property.

Additionally, on each due date, the borrower is required to fund the following reserves with respect to the University Place Property: (i) a tax reserve in an amount equal to one-twelfth of the amount that the lender estimates will be necessary to pay taxes over the then succeeding 12-month period, (ii) at the option of the lender, if the liability or casualty policy maintained by the borrower does not constitute an approved blanket or umbrella insurance policy under the University Place Loan documents, an insurance reserve in an amount equal to one-twelfth of the amount that the lender estimates will be necessary to pay insurance premiums over the then succeeding 12-month period, (iii) a replacement reserve in the amount of $3,941 subject to a cap of $141,891 and (iv) a tenant improvements and leasing commissions reserve in the amount of $10,948, subject to a cap of $262,759.

■ Lockbox and Cash Management. The University Place Loan documents require a hard lockbox with springing cash management. The University Place Loan documents require the borrower to direct tenants to pay rent directly to a lender-controlled lockbox account and require that all other money received by the borrower with respect to the University Place Property be promptly deposited into such lockbox account following receipt. On each business day that no University Place Trigger Period (as defined below) is continuing, all amounts in the lockbox account are required to be swept to a borrower-controlled operating account. During the continuance of a University Place Trigger Period, all amounts in the lockbox account are required to be swept to a lender-controlled cash management account on a daily basis and, provided no event of default under the University Place Loan documents is continuing, applied to payment of applicable debt service, payment of operating expenses, and funding of required reserves, with the remainder being deposited into an excess cash flow reserve. Provided no event of default under the University Place Loan documents is continuing, funds in the excess cash flow reserve are (i) to the extent a University Place Trigger Period is continuing, to be held by the lender as additional collateral for the University Place Loan; provided that, so long as lender approval is obtained for all expenditures other than those required on account of a threat to life or safety at the University Place Property, such excess cash flow reserves may be disbursed to the borrower to pay for certain operating expenses associated with the University Place Property (other than debt service and other amounts due under the terms of the University Place Loan documents) to the extent property cash flow and reserve funds available to the

B-120

UNIVERSITY PLACE

borrower are insufficient to pay for the same and (ii) to the extent no University Place Trigger Period is continuing, to be swept into the borrower’s operating account. After the occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default under the University Place Loan documents, the lender may apply any funds in the cash management account to amounts payable under the University Place Loan (and/or toward the payment of expenses of the University Place Property), in such order of priority as the lender may determine.

A “University Place Trigger Period” means a period commencing (i) upon the occurrence of an event of default under the University Place Loan documents and continuing until the same is cured, (ii) on the date that the debt service coverage ratio is less than 1.20x and continuing until the debt service coverage ratio is equal to or greater than 1.25x for one calendar quarter and (iii) upon the occurrence of a University Place Specified Tenant Trigger Period (as defined below), and continuing until the same is cured.

A “University Place Specified Tenant Trigger Period” means a period (A) commencing upon the first to occur of (i) a University Place Specified Tenant (as defined below) being in default under its lease beyond applicable notice and cure periods, (ii) a University Place Specified Tenant failing to be in actual, physical possession of its space, failing to be open to the public for business during customary hours and/or “going dark” in its space, (iii) a University Place Specified Tenant giving notice that it is terminating or otherwise not renewing its lease, (iv) any termination, cancellation or failure to be in full force and effect of any University Place Specified Tenant lease, (v) any bankruptcy or similar insolvency of any University Place Specified Tenant and (vi) a University Place Specified Tenant failing to extend or renew the applicable University Place Specified Tenant lease on or before the earlier of six months prior to the expiration of the lease term and the date on which notice is required under such lease; and (B) expiring upon the first to occur of the lender’s receipt of reasonably acceptable evidence of (1) with respect to periods commenced by (i) above, the cure of all defaults; with respect to (ii) above, the University Place Specified Tenant being in actual, physical possession of the space and open to the public; with respect to (iii) above, the University Place Specified Tenant having revoked all termination notices and re-affirmed its lease; with respect to (iv) above, the University Place Specified Tenant’s renewal of its lease; with respect to (v) above, the University Place Specified Tenant no longer being insolvent and having affirmed its lease pursuant to a final, non-appealable order; and with respect to (vi) above, the University Place Specified Tenant paying full, unabated rent under its lease, or (2) the borrower leasing the entire space demised to the University Place Specified Tenant and the applicable tenant under the lease being in physical occupancy of the space, open for business to the public, and paying the full amount of the rent due under its lease.

A “University Place Specified Tenant” means (i) Dick’s Sporting Goods, (ii) any other lessee(s) of the space demised to Dick’s Sporting Goods as of the closing date (or any portion thereof) and (iii) any current or future guarantor(s) of any lease related to the foregoing space.

■ Property Management. The University Place Property is currently managed by DLC Management Corporation, an affiliate of the borrower. Under the University Place Loan documents, the University Place Property may not be managed by any party other than DLC Management Corporation; provided, however, if no event of default under the University Place Loan documents exists (other than an event of default caused by a Guarantor Specified EOD (as defined below) whereby the guarantor is being replaced in accordance with the University Place Loan documents and the University Place property manager is concurrently being replaced) the borrower can replace DLC Management Corporation, with a property manager that is reasonably approved by the lender in writing (which may be conditioned on a rating agency confirmation) and, if such property manager is an affiliate of the borrower, a new non-consolidation opinion is provided from the borrower’s counsel. The lender has the right to terminate the management agreement and replace the property manager or require that the borrower terminate the management agreement and replace the property manager if (a) the property manager becomes a debtor in (i) any involuntary bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding that is not dismissed within 90 days of the filing thereof or (ii) any voluntary bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding, (b) there exists an event of default under the University Place Loan documents, (c) the property manager has engaged in gross negligence, fraud, willful misconduct or misappropriation of funds or (d) there exists a default by the property manager beyond all applicable notice and cure periods under the management agreement.

B-121

UNIVERSITY PLACE

A “Guarantor Specified EOD” means an event of default pursuant to the University Place Loan documents that is caused by: (i) the death or incompetency of the University Place Loan non-recourse carveout guarantor, (ii) a breach by the University Place Loan non-recourse carveout guarantor of certain financial covenants set forth in the University Place Loan documents, (iii) a bankruptcy of or similar proceeding involving the University Place Loan non-recourse carveout guarantor and/or (iv) a breach by the University Place Loan non-recourse carveout guarantor of certain financial and spousal consent covenants set forth in the University Place Loan documents.

■ Mezzanine or Secured Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.

■ Terrorism Insurance. The borrower is required to maintain an “all-risk” insurance policy in an amount equal to 100% of the full replacement cost of the University Place Property, plus a business interruption insurance policy that provides 18 months of business interruption coverage with an extended period endorsement which provides for up to six months of additional coverage. The insurance policies are not permitted to exclude terrorism coverage; provided, that, if TRIPRA (or any applicable subsequent statute, extension or reauthorization) is not in effect and terrorism coverage becomes subject to rating and availability on the open market, the borrower is not required to pay additional annual premiums in excess of an amount equal to two times the annual premium then payable (determined to the extent only the related mortgaged property was insured) in order to obtain the terrorism coverage as part of any applicable insurance policy (but the borrower is required to purchase the maximum amount of terrorism coverage available with respect to the applicable insurance policy for such amount). The “all-risk” insurance policy providing terrorism insurance is required to contain a deductible that is no higher than $10,000, except as otherwise permitted in the related loan documents. See “Risk Factors—Terrorism Insurance May Be Unavailable or Insufficient” in the Prospectus Supplement.

B-122

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

B-123

VIRGINIA WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET PORTFOLIO

 

B-124

VIRGINIA WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET PORTFOLIO

 

B-125

VIRGINIA WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET PORTFOLIO

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	3	Loan Seller			CGMRC
Location (City/State)	Roanoke, Virginia	Cut-off Date Principal Balance			$26,046,472
Property Type	Retail	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per SF			$209.93
Size (SF)	124,073	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance			2.7%
Total Occupancy as of 9/6/2015	100.0%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans			None
Owned Occupancy as of 9/6/2015	100.0%	Type of Security			Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	2015 / NAP	Mortgage Rate			4.6200%
Appraised Value	$35,800,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)			120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)			360
		Original Interest Only Term (Months)		36
Underwritten Revenues	$2,246,348
Underwritten Expenses	$393,692		Escrows
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$1,852,656		Upfront		Monthly
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$1,834,045	Taxes	$0		$0
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio	72.8%	Insurance	$0		$0
Maturity Date LTV Ratio	63.9%	Replacement Reserves	$0		$0
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	1.15x / 1.14x	TI/LC	$0		$0
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	7.1% / 7.0%	Other	$0		$0

Sources and Uses
Sources	$	%		Uses	$	%
Loan Amount	$26,046,472	73.7	%	Purchase Price	$34,728,629	98.3	%
Principal’s New Cash Contribution	8,865,612	25.1		Closing Costs	594,827	1.7
Other Sources	411,372	1.2
Total Sources	$35,323,456	100.0	%	Total Uses	$35,323,456	100.0	%

■ The Mortgage Loan. The mortgage loan (the “Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan”) is evidenced by a note in the original principal amount of $26,046,472 and is secured by a first mortgage encumbering the borrowers’ fee simple interest in three Walmart-anchored retail properties located in Roanoke, Virginia (the “Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties”). The Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan was originated by Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. on July 10, 2015 and represents approximately 2.7% of the Initial Pool Balance. The note evidencing the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan has an outstanding principal balance as of the Cut-off Date of $26,046,472 and an interest rate of 4.6200% per annum. The proceeds of the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan were primarily used to acquire the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties.

The Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan had an initial term of 120 months and has a remaining term of 119 months as of the Cut-off Date. The Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan requires monthly payments of interest only for the initial 36 months, followed by monthly payments of principal and interest sufficient to amortize the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan over a 30-year amortization schedule. The scheduled maturity date of the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan is the due date in August 2025. At any time after the second anniversary of the securitization Closing Date, the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan may be defeased with certain direct full faith and credit obligations of the United States of America or other obligations which are “government securities” permitted under the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan documents. Voluntary prepayment of the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan is permitted on or after the due date occurring in June 2025 without payment of any prepayment premium.

■ The Mortgaged Properties. The Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties consist of three recently constructed Walmart Neighborhood Market stores located in Roanoke, Virginia. The Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties comprise an aggregate 124,073 SF and were constructed in 2015. As of September 6, 2015, Total Occupancy and Owned Occupancy were both 100.0%.

B-126

VIRGINIA WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET PORTFOLIO

The following table presents certain information relating to the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties:

Property Name	City	State	Cut-off Date Allocated Loan Amount	Total GLA	Occupancy(1)	Appraised Value	Year Built / Renovated	UW NCF
Dale Avenue Roanoke	Roanoke	VA	$9,080,000	41,117	100.0%	$12,500,000	2015 / NAP	$639,725
Plantation Road Walmart	Roanoke	VA	8,571,750	41,839	100.0%	11,800,000	2015 / NAP	603,432
Walmart Orange Avenue	Roanoke	VA	8,394,722	41,117	100.0%	11,500,000	2015 / NAP	590,888
Total / Wtd. Avg.			$26,046,472	124,073	100.0%	$35,800,000		$1,834,045

(1) Occupancy as of September 6, 2015.

The following table presents certain information relating to the tenants at the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties:

Largest Tenants Based on Underwritten Base Rent

Tenant Name	Credit Rating (Fitch/MIS/S&P)(1)	Tenant GLA	% of GLA		UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent		UW Base Rent $ per SF	Lease Expiration	Renewal / Extension Options
Walmart – Dale Avenue	AA / Aa2/ AA	41,117	33.1	%	$653,760	34.9	%	$15.90	1/27/2035	4, 5-year options
Walmart – Plantation Road	AA / Aa2/ AA	41,839	33.7		617,166	32.9		$14.75	1/27/2035	4, 5-year options
Walmart – Orange Avenue	AA / Aa2/ AA	41,117	33.1		604,420	32.2		$14.70	3/15/2035	4, 5-year options
Largest Tenants		124,073	100.0	%	$1,875,346	100.0	%	$15.11
Vacant		0	0.0		0	0.0		0.00
Total / Wtd. Avg. All Tenants		124,073	100.0	%	$1,875,346	100.0	%	$15.11

(1) Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease.

The following table presents the lease rollover schedule at the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties, based on initial lease expiration dates:

Lease Expiration Schedule

Year Ending December 31,	Expiring Owned GLA	% of Owned GLA		Cumulative % of Owned GLA	UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent		UW Base Rent $ per SF	# of Expiring Tenants
MTM	0	0.0	%	0.0%	$0	0.0	%	$0.00	0
2015	0	0.0		0.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2016	0	0.0		0.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2017	0	0.0		0.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2018	0	0.0		0.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2019	0	0.0		0.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2020	0	0.0		0.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2021	0	0.0		0.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2022	0	0.0		0.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2023	0	0.0		0.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2024	0	0.0		0.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2025	0	0.0		0.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2026 & Thereafter	124,073	100.0		100.0%	1,875,346	100.0		15.11	3
Vacant	0	0.0		100.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
Total / Wtd. Avg.	124,073	100.0	%		$1,875,346	100.0	%	$15.11	3

B-127

VIRGINIA WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET PORTFOLIO

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾

	Underwritten	Underwritten $ per SF
Base Rent	$1,875,346	$15.11
Contractual Rent Steps	0	0.00
Gross Up Vacancy	0	0.00
Total Rent	$1,875,346	$15.11
Total Reimbursables	393,692	3.17
Other Income	0	0.00
Vacancy & Credit Loss	(22,690)	(0.18)
Effective Gross Income	$2,246,348	$18.11
Real Estate Taxes	$193,674	$1.56
Insurance	37,222	0.30
Management Fee	44,927	0.36
Other Operating Expenses	117,869	0.95
Total Operating Expenses	$393,692	$3.17
Net Operating Income	$1,852,656	$14.93
TI/LC	0	0.00
Replacement Reserves	18,611	0.15
Net Cash Flow	$1,834,045	$14.78

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, lease cancellation income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) Historical cash flow is not available because the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties were built in 2015.

■ Appraisal. As of the appraisal valuation date of March 23, 2015, the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties had an aggregate “as-is” appraised value of $35,800,000.

■ Environmental Matters. According to the Phase I environmental reports dated March 19, 2015 through March 23, 2015, there were no recommendations for further action.

■ Market Overview and Competition. The Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties are located in Roanoke, Virginia. The Roanoke metropolitan statistical area is the transportation hub of western Virginia, with an integrated interstate highway, rail, and air transportation network. Corporate and commercial air travel is provided by the Roanoke-Blacksburg Regional Airport, located within the northern portion of the city of Roanoke. Roanoke-Blacksburg Regional Airport offers approximately 50 scheduled airline flights arriving and departing daily and provides nonstop service to 9 major cities. The city of Roanoke is 189 miles west of Richmond, the state capital, 234 miles southwest of Washington, D.C., and 240 miles west of Norfolk.

The largest employment industries in Roanoke include government, healthcare, retail trade, manufacturing and food services. The largest employers in the area include Roanoke Memorial Community Hospital, Roanoke City School Board and Roanoke County School Board. Advance Auto Parts, the largest retailer of automotive replacement parts and accessories in the United States, is headquartered in Roanoke. Other major companies with headquarters or major regional offices in Roanoke include FreightCar America, a publically traded freight car manufacturing company, Virginia Transformer Corp, the leading transformer manufacturer in the United States, and RGC Resources, a publically traded natural gas company.

The appraiser identified five competitive properties for the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties. The competitive properties ranged from 20,707 SF to 49,592 SF, with an average size of 35,103 SF. Rental rates ranged from $6.40 per SF to $14.88 per SF, with an average rent of $11.58 per SF. The appraiser concluded that each of the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties rents is at market level.

B-128

VIRGINIA WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET PORTFOLIO

The following table presents demographic information related to the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties:

	2014 Population Within Radius			2014 Avg. Household Income Within Radius
Property	1-Mile	3-Mile	5-Mile	1-Mile	3-Mile	5-Mile
Dale Avenue Roanoke	8,107	57,767	119,668	$36,801	$47,921	$54,298
Plantation Road Walmart	9,239	51,101	120,436	$57,681	$58,835	$56,847
Walmart Orange Avenue	3,059	42,082	103,564	$60,845	$59,527	$57,667

■ The Borrowers. The borrowers are (i) Hollywood WNM Dale, LLC, (ii) Hollywood WNM Orange LLC and (iii) Hollywood WNM Plantation, LLC, each a Delaware single-purpose limited liability company. Legal counsel to the borrowers delivered a non-consolidation opinion in connection with the origination of the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan. Kenneth Shimm is the non-recourse carveout guarantor under the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan.

Kenneth Shimm is the President and CEO of Hollywood Atlantic Real Estate Group, a commercial real estate development and property management company.

■ Escrows. The borrowers are not required to fund any reserves provided that the Reserve Waiver Conditions (as defined below) are met. In the event that the Reserve Waiver Conditions are not met, the borrowers are required to fund the following reserves with respect to the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties on each due date: (i) a tax reserve in an amount equal to one-twelfth of the amount that the lender estimates will be necessary to pay taxes over the then succeeding 12-month period; (ii) at the option of the lender, if the policy maintained by the borrowers covering the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties (or any portion thereof) does not constitute an approved blanket or umbrella policy under the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan documents or the lender requires the borrowers to obtain a separate policy, an insurance reserve in an amount equal to one-twelfth of the amount that the lender estimates will be necessary to pay insurance premiums over the then succeeding 12-month period; and (iii) a replacement reserve in the amount of $1,551.

“Reserve Waiver Conditions” means each of the following: (i) no event of default under the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan documents exists, (ii) each Specified Tenant lease is in full force and effect with no defaults thereunder, (iii) each Specified Tenant continues to make the payments and perform the obligations required under its respective lease, in each case, relating to the obligations and liabilities for which the applicable reserve account was established, (iv) each Specified Tenant is not bankrupt or insolvent and (v) each Specified Tenant has not expressed its intention in writing to terminate, cancel or default under the related Specified Tenant lease (including, without limitation, in connection with any rejection in any bankruptcy or similar insolvency proceeding).

“Specified Tenant” means, as applicable, (i) Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and (ii) any other lessee(s) of the Specified Tenant space (or any portion thereof) and any guarantor(s) of the applicable Specified Tenant lease(s), including Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

■ Lockbox and Cash Management. The Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan is structured with a springing lockbox and springing cash management. During the continuance of a Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Trigger Period (and continuing after the end of the second occurrence of a Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Trigger Period), the lender may send letters from the borrowers that it is holding in escrow to direct tenants to pay rent directly to a lender-controlled lockbox account, and the borrowers are required to deposit all revenue generated by the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties in the lockbox account. All sums on deposit in the lockbox account are required to be swept on a daily basis into a cash management account for the payment of, among other things, debt service, funding of monthly escrows and

B-129

VIRGINIA WALMART NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET PORTFOLIO

property operating expenses, with any excess to be held by the lender as additional security for the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan.

“Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Trigger Period” means the period (A) commencing upon the earliest of (i) the occurrence of an event of default, (ii) the debt service coverage ratio being less than 1.10x and (iii) the occurrence of Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Specified Tenant Trigger Period (as defined below); and (B) expiring upon (x) with regard to clause (i) above, the cure of such event of default, (y) with regard to clause (ii) above, the debt service coverage ratio being equal to or greater than 1.15x for two consecutive calendar quarters and (z) with regard to clause (iii) above, such Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Specified Tenant Trigger Period ceasing to exist.

“Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Specified Tenant Trigger Period” means a period (A) commencing upon the first to occur of (i) a Specified Tenant being in monetary default under its lease, (ii) the senior unsecured credit rating (or equivalent thereof) of a Specified Tenant falling to below a Baa3 rating according to Moody’s credit ratings (or equivalent rating from the other major rating agencies), (iii) a Specified Tenant giving notice that it is terminating its lease for all or any portion of its space, (iv) any termination or cancellation of any Specified Tenant lease and/or any Specified Tenant lease failing to otherwise be in full force and effect, and (v) any bankruptcy or similar insolvency of a Specified Tenant and (B) expiring upon the first to occur of the lender’s receipt of evidence reasonably acceptable to the lender of: (1) with respect to (i) above, such default having been cured, with respect to (ii) above, the applicable rating having improved to Baa3 or greater according to Moody’s credit ratings (or equivalent rating from other major rating agencies), with respect to (iii) above, the Specified Tenant having rescinded all termination or cancellation notices and re-affirmed its lease, with respect to (iv) above, the applicable Specified Tenant paying full, unabated rent under its applicable lease, and with respect to (v) above, the Specified Tenant no longer being insolvent and having affirmed its lease pursuant to a final, non-appealable order; or (2) the borrowers leasing the entire Specified Tenant space or applicable portion thereof for a term of not less than five years to a tenant in actual occupancy of and operating at the space and paying the full amount of rent due under its lease.

■ Property Management. The Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties are currently self-managed by the borrowers. Under the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan documents, the borrowers may terminate and replace the property manager without the lender’s consent, so long as (i) no event of default has occurred and is continuing under the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan documents, (ii) the lender receives at least 30 days’ prior written notice and (iii) the applicable replacement property manager is approved by the lender in writing (which approval may be conditioned upon the lender’s receipt of Rating Agency Confirmation). The lender has the right to require an independent third party property manager upon an event of default under the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan documents.

■ Mezzanine or Subordinate Indebtedness. Not permitted.

■ Release of Collateral. Not permitted.

■ Terrorism Insurance. The borrowers are required to maintain an “all-risk” insurance policy that provides coverage for terrorism in an amount equal to the full replacement cost of the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties, covering no less than 18 months of business interruption coverage as calculated under the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan documents in an amount equal to 100% of the projected gross income from the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties (on an actual loss sustained basis) for a period continuing until the restoration of the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Properties is completed and containing an extended period endorsement which provides for up to six months of additional coverage. The “all-risk’ insurance policy providing terrorism insurance is required to contain a deductible that is no higher than $10,000, except as otherwise permitted in the Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio Loan documents. See “Risk Factors—Terrorism Insurance May Not Be Available for All Mortgaged Properties” in the Prospectus Supplement.

B-130

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

B-131

AMSDELL COMPASS MICHIGAN PORTFOLIO

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	3	Loan Seller		CGMRC
Location (City/State)	Various, Michigan	Cut-off Date Principal Balance		$21,000,000
Property Type	Self Storage	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per SF		$100.68
Size (SF)	208,582	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance		2.2%
Total Occupancy as of 8/5/2015	84.4%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans		None
Owned Occupancy as of 8/5/2015	84.4%	Type of Security		Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	Various / NAP	Mortgage Rate		4.5100%
Appraised Value	$28,200,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)		120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)		360
		Original Interest Only Period (Months)		36
Underwritten Revenues	$2,761,566	Borrower Sponsor(1)	Amsdell Group Preferred III, LLC
Underwritten Expenses	$935,505	Escrows
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$1,826,061		Upfront	Monthly
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$1,794,774	Taxes	$19,297	$19,297
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio(2)	71.6%	Insurance	$0	$0
Maturity Date LTV Ratio	63.2%	Replacement Reserves	$0	$2,607
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	1.43x / 1.40x	TI/LC	$0	$0
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	8.7% / 8.5%	Other(3)	$800,000	$0

Sources and Uses
Sources	$	%	Uses	$	%
Loan Amount	$21,000,000	99.7%	Principal Equity Distribution	$11,063,635	52.5%
Other Sources	60,000	0.3	Loan Payoff	8,751,298	41.6
			Reserves	819,297	3.9
			Closing Costs	425,770	2.0
Total Sources	$21,060,000	100.0%	Total Uses	$21,060,000	100.0%

(1) Robert J. Amsdell and Barry L. Amsdell are the non-recourse carveout guarantors under the Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio Loan.

(2) Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is adjusted for $800,000 holdback.

(3) Other upfront reserve represents an $800,000 reserve for an economic holdback at the Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio Properties.

The following table presents certain information relating to the Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio Properties:

Property	City	State	Allocated Cut-off Date Loan Amount	Total GLA	Occupancy(1)	Year Built	Year Renovated	UW NCF
Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills	Rochester Hills	MI	$7,500,000	64,868	94.2%	2005	NAP	$652,612
Compass Self Storage Novi	Novi	MI	7,500,000	68,589	87.0%	2003	NAP	629,478
Compass Self Storage Madison Heights	Madison Heights	MI	6,000,000	75,125	73.5%	2002	NAP	512,684
Total / Wtd. Avg. Portfolio			$21,000,000	208,582	84.4%			$1,794,774

(1) As provided by the borrower and represents physical occupancy based on square footage as of August 5, 2015.

The following table presents certain information relating to historical leasing at the Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio Properties:

Historical Leased %⁽¹⁾ 

Property	2012	2013	2014	As of 8/5/2015
Compass Self Storage Rochester Hills	90.1%	86.6%	87.1%	94.2%
Compass Self Storage Novi	89.2%	87.2%	86.6%	87.0%
Compass Self Storage Madison Heights	73.7%	77.6%	77.6%	73.5%
Total / Wtd. Avg. Portfolio	83.9%	83.6%	83.5%	84.4%

(1) As provided by the borrower.

B-132

AMSDELL COMPASS MICHIGAN PORTFOLIO

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Amsdell Compass Michigan Portfolio Properties:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

	2012		2013		2014		TTM 6/30/2015		Underwritten		Underwritten $ per SF
Base Rent	$2,717,509		$2,830,553		$2,927,058		$3,041,562		$2,603,202		$12.48
Gross Up Vacancy	0		0		0		0		559,395		2.68
Total Rent Revenue	$2,717,509		$2,830,553		$2,927,058		$3,041,562		$3,162,596		$15.16
Other Income(2)	134,021		157,580		200,638		214,425		214,425		1.03
Vacancy & Credit Loss	(614,296	)	(512,688	)	(456,901	)	(494,421	)	(615,455	)	(2.95	)
Effective Gross Income	$2,237,234		$2,475,444		$2,670,796		$2,761,566		$2,761,566		$13.24
Real Estate Taxes	210,974		207,644		210,356		219,261		216,000		1.04
Insurance	23,880		25,939		26,733		27,647		24,191		0.12
Management Fee	89,489		99,018		106,832		110,463		110,463		0.53
Other Operating Expenses	561,516		574,249		590,590		577,712		584,852		2.80
Total Operating Expenses	$885,858		$906,849		$934,510		$935,082		$935,505		$4.49
Net Operating Income	$1,351,376		$1,568,595		$1,736,286		$1,826,484		$1,826,061		$8.75
Historical Capital Expenses	0		0		0		0		31,287		0.15
Net Cash Flow	$1,351,376		$1,568,595		$1,736,286		$1,826,484		$1,794,774		$8.60

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, lease cancellation income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) Other Income consists of administrative fees, tenant paid insurance, truck rental and miscellaneous income.

B-133

MIX AT MIDTOWN

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	1	Loan Seller		GSMC
Location (City/State)	Houston, Texas	Cut-off Date Principal Balance		$19,500,000
Property Type	Retail	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per SF		$267.49
Size (SF)	72,901	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance		2.0%
Total Occupancy as of 8/5/2015	100.0%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans		None
Owned Occupancy as of 8/5/2015	100.0%	Type of Security		Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	1970, 2008 / NAP	Mortgage Rate		4.3190%
Appraised Value	$28,520,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)		120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)		360
		Original Interest Only Term (Months)	NAP
		Borrower Sponsor(1)	George Levan, John Levan and Levan Group I, LP
Underwritten Revenues	$2,665,498
Underwritten Expenses	$863,634		Escrows
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$1,801,864		Upfront	Monthly
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$1,718,028	Taxes	$94,867	$10,541
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio	68.4%	Insurance	$11,444	$5,722
Maturity Date LTV Ratio	54.9%	Replacement Reserves(2)	$0	$1,196
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	1.55x / 1.48x	TI/LC(3)	$0	$3,038
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	9.2% / 8.8%	Other(4)	$100,384	$0

Sources and Uses
Sources	$	%	Uses	$	%
Loan Amount	$19,500,000	100.0%	Loan Payoff	$9,894,510	50.7%
			Principal Equity Distribution	9,113,043	46.7
			Closing Costs	285,752	1.5
			Reserves	206,695	1.1
Total Sources	$19,500,000	100.0%	Total Uses	$19,500,000	100.0%

(1) The non-recourse carveout guarantors under the Mix at Midtown Loan are George Levan, John Levan (as to certain events and in certain circumstances) and Levan Group I, LP.

(2) The replacement reserve is capped at $57,400.

(3) The TI/LC reserve is capped at $145,800.

(4) Other reserve represents an existing casualty reserve ($71,784) to repair fire damage and a deferred maintenance reserve ($28,600).

The following table presents certain information relating to the major tenants (of which, certain tenants may have co-tenancy provisions) at the Mix at Midtown Property:

Largest Tenants Based on Underwritten Base Rent

Tenant Name	Credit Rating (Fitch/MIS/S&P)	Tenant GLA	% of GLA		UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent		UW Base Rent $ per SF	Lease Expiration	Tenant Sales $ per SF	Occupancy Cost	Renewal / Extension Options
24 Hour Fitness	NR / NR / NR	49,000	67.2	%	$1,172,570	59.4	%	$23.93	6/30/2023	NA	NA	3, 5-year options
Artisans Restaurant(1)	NR / NR / NR	7,640	10.5		247,689	12.5		32.42	5/4/2021	$319	13.6%	2, 5-year options
Holley’s Restaurant(2)	NR / NR / NR	6,777	9.3		243,972	12.4		36.00	2/10/2024	$415	11.4%	2, 5-year options
Piola Pizzeria(2)	NR / NR / NR	3,094	4.2		114,478	5.8		37.00	6/6/2020	$527	9.1%	2, 5-year options
Jinya Ramen(3)	NR / NR / NR	2,842	3.9		96,628	4.9		34.00	5/8/2024	$931	4.8%	2, 5-year options
Urban Oasis Day Spa	NR / NR / NR	2,018	2.8		60,540	3.1		30.00	10/31/2019	NA	NA	1, 5-year option
Dolce Delight	NR / NR / NR	1,530	2.1		38,250	1.9		25.00	1/5/2018	NA	NA	1, 3-year option
Largest Tenants		72,901	100.0	%	$1,974,127	100.0	%	$27.08
Remaining Owned Tenants		0	0.0		0	0.0		0.00
Vacant (Owned Space)		0	0.0		0	0.0		0.00
Total / Wtd. Avg. All Tenants		72,901	100.0	%	$1,974,127	100.0	%	$27.08

(1) Tenant does not report monthly sales. Sales are for January 2015 through May 2015 annualized.

(2) Sales are for the TTM ending June 2015.

(3) Sales are for January 2015 through June 2015 annualized.

B-134

MIX AT MIDTOWN

The following table presents the lease rollover schedule at the Mix at Midtown Property, based on initial lease expiration dates:

Lease Expiration Schedule⁽¹⁾

Year Ending December 31,	Expiring Owned GLA	% of Owned GLA		Cumulative % of Owned GLA		UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent		UW Base Rent $ per SF	# of Expiring Tenants
MTM	0	0.0	%	0.0	%	$0	0.0	%	$0.00	0
2015	0	0.0		0.0	%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2016	0	0.0		0.0	%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2017	0	0.0		0.0	%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2018	1,530	2.1		2.1	%	38,250	1.9		25.00	1
2019	2,018	2.8		4.9	%	60,540	3.1		30.00	1
2020	3,094	4.2		9.1	%	114,478	5.8		37.00	1
2021	7,640	10.5		19.6	%	247,689	12.5		32.42	1
2022	0	0.0		19.6	%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2023	49,000	67.2		86.8	%	1,172,570	59.4		23.93	1
2024	9,619	13.2		100.0	%	340,600	17.3		35.41	2
2025	0	0.0		100.0	%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2026 & Thereafter	0	0.0		100.0	%	0	0.0		0.00	0
Vacant	0	0.0		100.0	%	0	0.0		0.00	0
Total / Wtd. Avg.	72,901	100.0	%			$1,974,127	100.0	%	$27.08	7

(1) Calculated based on approximate square footage occupied by each Owned Tenant.

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Mix at Midtown Property:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

	2013	2014	TTM 6/30/2015	Underwritten(2)	Underwritten $ per SF
Base Rent	$1,522,340	$1,784,203	$1,930,151	$1,974,127	$27.08
Gross Up Vacancy	0	0	0	0	0.00
Total Rent	$1,522,340	$1,784,203	$1,930,151	$1,974,127	$27.08
Total Reimbursables	796,492	762,202	861,503	831,660	11.41
Other Income	0	0	0	0	0.00
Vacancy & Credit Loss	0	0	0	(140,289)	(1.92)
Effective Gross Income	$2,318,832	$2,546,405	$2,791,654	$2,665,498	$36.56
Real Estate Taxes	$331,216	$363,892	$380,692	$372,136	$5.10
Insurance	104,462	108,687	109,941	68,760	0.94
Management Fee	102,000	102,000	102,000	93,771	1.29
Other Operating Expenses	270,413	319,981	334,164	328,967	4.51
Total Operating Expenses	$808,091	$894,560	$926,797	$863,634	$11.85
Net Operating Income	$1,510,741	$1,651,845	$1,864,857	$1,801,864	$24.72
TI/LC	0	0	0	69,256	0.95
Replacement Reserves	0	0	0	14,580	0.20
Net Cash Flow	$1,510,741	$1,651,845	$1,864,857	$1,718,028	$23.57

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) Underwritten Base Rent is based on contractual rents as of August 5, 2015 and rent steps through September 30, 2016.

B-135

RED DOT STORAGE PORTFOLIO

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	9	Loan Seller		CGMRC
Location (City/State)	Various, Various	Cut-off Date Principal Balance		$16,000,000
Property Type	Self Storage	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per SF		$38.78
Size (SF)	412,585	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance		1.7%
Total Occupancy as of 6/25/2015	91.0%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans		None
Owned Occupancy as of 6/25/2015	91.0%	Type of Security		Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	Various / NAP	Mortgage Rate		4.5600%
Appraised Value	$21,970,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)		120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)		360
		Original Interest Only Period (Months)		36
Underwritten Revenues	$2,409,472	Borrower Sponsor(1)		Seth Bent
Underwritten Expenses	$989,169	Escrows
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$1,420,303		Upfront	Monthly
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$1,379,044	Taxes	$58,784	$29,392
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio	72.8%	Insurance	$0	$0
Maturity Date LTV Ratio	63.8%	Replacement Reserves(2)	$0	$3,438
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	1.45x / 1.41x	TI/LC	$0	$0
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	8.9% / 8.6%	Other(3)	$210,284	$0

Sources and Uses
Sources	$	%	Uses	$	%
Loan Amount	$16,000,000	99.7%	Loan Payoff	$13,133,600	81.8%
Other Sources	52,517	0.3	Principal Equity Distribution	2,088,178	13.0
			Closing Costs	561,671	3.5
			Reserves	269,068	1.7
Total Sources	$16,052,517	100.0%	Total Uses	$16,052,517	100.0%

(1) Seth Bent is the non-recourse carveout guarantor under the Red Dot Storage Portfolio Loan.

(2) Replacement reserve is capped at $82,518.

(3) The other upfront reserve represents a $210,284 reserve for deferred maintenance.

The following table presents certain information relating to the Red Dot Storage Portfolio Properties:

Property Address	City		State	Allocated Cut-off Date Loan Amount	Total GLA	Occupancy(1)	Year Built	Year Renovated	UW NCF
2105 South Eastwood Drive		Woodstock	IL	$2,892,500	47,650	91.1%	1999-2002	NAP	$244,514
1960 Wiesbrook Road		Oswego	IL	2,475,000	60,750	92.8%	2001	NAP	205,212
8101 North Hale Avenue		Peoria	IL	2,377,500	74,120	88.3%	1977-1994	NAP	241,764
3305 16th Street		Zion	IL	2,150,000	41,500	87.0%	2002-2009	NAP	165,836
180 Elizabeth Lane		Genoa City	WI	1,695,000	55,780	94.6%	2002-2009	NAP	155,686
204 Wolf Street		Yorkville	IL	1,537,500	30,000	93.0%	1995	NAP	137,657
1900 Alden Road		Janesville	WI	1,305,000	45,875	93.9%	1986-2008	NAP	104,439
1243 Shappert Drive		Machesney Park	IL	817,500	31,500	87.1%	2006-2009	NAP	65,161
5750 Sandy Hollow Road		Rockford	IL	750,000	25,410	90.8%	1992-1999	NAP	58,776
Total / Wtd. Avg. Portfolio				$16,000,000	412,585	91.0%			$1,379,044

(1) As provided by the borrowers and represents physical occupancy based on square footage as of June 25, 2015.

The following table presents certain information relating to historical leasing at the Red Dot Storage Portfolio Properties:

Historical Leased %⁽¹⁾ 

Property Address	2013(2)	2014(2)	TTM 6/25/2015
2105 South Eastwood Drive	66.7%	84.4%	91.1%
1960 Wiesbrook Road	64.2%	80.6%	92.8%
8101 North Hale Avenue	NAV	NAV	88.3%
3305 16th Street	NAV	NAV	87.0%
180 Elizabeth Lane	91.4%	95.0%	94.6%
204 Wolf Street	86.4%	86.8%	93.0%
1900 Alden Road	96.0%	96.6%	93.9%
1243 Shappert Drive	87.7%	87.3%	87.1%
5750 Sandy Hollow Road	82.1%	85.6%	90.8%
Total / Wtd. Avg. Portfolio	80.9%	88.2%	91.0%

(1) As provided by the borrowers.

(2) Weighted by square footage and excludes properties with no historical cash flow.

B-136

RED DOT STORAGE PORTFOLIO

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Red Dot Storage Portfolio Properties:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

	2012	2013		2014		TTM 4/30/2015		Underwritten		Underwritten $ per SF
Base Rent	$597,225	$1,571,268		$1,713,875		$2,511,572		$2,512,632		$6.09
Gross Up Vacancy	0	0		0		0		295,151		0.72
Total Rent Revenue	$597,225	$1,571,268		$1,713,875		$2,511,572		$2,807,783		$6.81
Other Income(2)	3,704	33,229		56,594		122,923		122,923		0.30
Vacancy & Credit Loss	0	(56,543	)	(133,055	)	(214,718	)	(521,234	)	(1.26	)
Effective Gross Income	$600,929	$1,547,954		$1,637,414		$2,419,776		$2,409,472		$5.84
Real Estate Taxes	77,889	165,540		188,301		330,688		345,984		0.84
Insurance	8,240	19,055		19,055		25,235		29,947		0.07
Management Fee	6,941	29,576		0		0		96,379		0.23
Other Operating Expenses	200,807	513,357		364,623		562,175		516,859		1.25
Total Operating Expenses	$293,876	$727,529		$571,979		$918,098		$989,169		$2.40
Net Operating Income	$307,052	$820,425		$1,065,435		$1,501,679		$1,420,303		$3.44
Replacement Reserves	0	0		0		0		41,259		0.10
Net Cash Flow	$307,052	$820,425		$1,065,435		$1,501,679		$1,379,044		$3.34

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, lease cancellation income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) Other Income consists of administrative fees, tenant paid insurance, truck rental and miscellaneous income.

B-137

STADIUM PLAZA

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	1	Loan Seller		CGMRC
Location (City/State)	Columbia, Missouri	Cut-off Date Principal Balance		$15,482,942
Property Type	Retail	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per SF		$121.47
Size (SF)	127,458	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance		1.6%
Total Occupancy as of 6/30/2015	98.4%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans		None
Owned Occupancy as of 6/30/2015	98.4%	Type of Security		Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	1969 / 2004	Mortgage Rate		4.8500%
Appraised Value	$20,650,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)		120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)		360
		Original Interest Only Term (Months)	NAP
		Borrower Sponsor(1)	Vicki D. Walters
Underwritten Revenues	$1,771,237
Underwritten Expenses	$333,148	Escrows
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$1,438,089		Upfront	Monthly
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$1,358,579	Taxes	$151,654	$16,850
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio	75.0%	Insurance	$11,164	$1,595
Maturity Date LTV Ratio	61.4%	Replacement Reserves(2)	$57,356	$0
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	1.47x / 1.38x	TI/LC(3)	$133,381	$0
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	9.3% / 8.8%	Other(4)	$500,000	$0

Sources and Uses 

Sources	$	%		Uses	$	%
Loan Amount	$15,500,000	93.1	%	Loan Payoff	$15,575,278	93.6	%
Principal’s New Cash Contribution	1,110,338	6.7		Reserves	853,555	5.1
Other Sources	37,500	0.2		Closing Costs	219,006	1.3
Total Sources	$16,647,838	100.0	%	Total Uses	$16,647,838	100.0	%

(1) Vicki D. Walters is the guarantor of the non-recourse carveouts under the Stadium Plaza Loan.

(2) Replacement reserve is capped at $57,356.

(3) TI/LC reserve is capped at $133,381.

(4) Upfront other reserve is comprised of $500,000 for TI/LC related to Hobby Lobby and Best Buy.

The following table presents certain information relating to the major tenants at the Stadium Plaza Property:

Largest Tenants Based on Underwritten Base Rent

Tenant Name	Credit Rating (Fitch/MIS/S&P)(1)	Tenant GLA	% of GLA		UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent		UW Base Rent $ per SF(2)	Lease Expiration	Renewal / Extension Options
Best Buy	BB / Baa2 / BB+	45,000	35.3	%	$580,500	37.9	%	$12.90	7/31/2020	4, 5-year options
Hobby Lobby	NR / NR / NR	63,024	49.4		535,704	34.9		8.50	8/31/2019	3, 5-year options
Texas Roadhouse	NR / NR / NR	11,550	9.1		145,000	9.5		12.55	8/16/2026	3, 5-year options
Chuck E Cheese	NR / NR / NR	0	0.0		131,250	8.6		0.00	7/31/2023	3, 5-year options
G&D Steakhouse	NR / NR / NR	2,000	1.6		51,840	3.4		25.92	12/31/2018	NA
Sally Beauty	NR / NR / NR	2,000	1.6		49,000	3.2		24.50	2/28/2019	NA
Lucky Nails	NR / NR / NR	1,884	1.5		39,480	2.6		20.96	6/14/2019	NA
Ten Largest Tenants		125,458	98.4	%	$1,532,774	100.0	%	$11.17
Remaining Tenants		0	0.0		0	0.0		0.00
Vacant		2,000	1.6		0	0.0		0.00
Total / Wtd. Avg. All Tenants		127,458	100.0	%	$1,532,774	100.0	%	$11.17

(1) Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease.

(2) Excludes Chuck E Cheese, which pays ground rent.

B-138

STADIUM PLAZA

The following table presents the lease rollover schedule at the Stadium Plaza Property, based on initial lease expiration dates:

Lease Expiration Schedule

Year Ending December 31,	Expiring Owned GLA	% of Owned GLA		Cumulative % of Owned GLA		UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent		UW Base Rent $ per SF	# of Expiring Tenants
MTM	0	0.0	%	0.0	%	$0	0.0	%	$0.00	0
2015	0	0.0		0.0	%	0	0.0		$0.00	0
2016	0	0.0		0.0	%	0	0.0		$0.00	0
2017	0	0.0		0.0	%	0	0.0		$0.00	0
2018	2,000	1.6		1.6	%	51,840	3.4		$25.92	1
2019	66,908	52.5		54.1	%	624,184	40.7		$9.33	3
2020	45,000	35.3		89.4	%	580,500	37.9		$12.90	1
2021	0	0.0		89.4	%	0	0.0		$0.00	0
2022	0	0.0		89.4	%	0	0.0		$0.00	0
2023	0	0.0		89.4	%	131,250	8.6		$0.00	1
2024	0	0.0		89.4	%	0	0.0		$0.00	0
2025	0	0.0		89.4	%	0	0.0		$0.00	0
2026 & Thereafter	11,550	9.1		98.4	%	145,000	9.5		$12.55	1
Vacant	2,000	1.6		100.0	%	0	0.0		$0.00	0
Total / Wtd. Avg.	127,458	100.0	%			$1,532,774	100.0	%	$12.22	7

The following table presents certain information relating to historical leasing at the Stadium Plaza Property:

Historical Leased %⁽¹⁾

	2012	2013	2014	6/30/2015
Owned Space	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	98.4%

(1) As provided by the borrower and which reflects average occupancy for the specified year unless otherwise specified.

n Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Stadium Plaza Property:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

	2012	2013	2014	TTM 5/31/2015	Underwritten	Underwritten $ per SF
Base Rent	$1,483,993	$1,484,851	$1,500,660	$1,524,943	$1,512,044	$11.86
Contractual Rent Steps	0	0	0	0	20,730	0.16
Gross Up Vacancy	0	0	0	0	52,096	0.41
Total Rent	$1,483,993	$1,484,851	$1,500,660	$1,524,943	$1,584,870	$12.43
Total Reimbursables	220,033	234,572	282,897	308,278	251,009	1.97
Other Income	26,583	26,594	28,926	32,317	27,152	0.21
Vacancy & Credit Loss	0	0	0	0	(91,794)	(0.72)
Effective Gross Income	$1,730,609	$1,746,017	$1,812,483	$1,865,538	$1,771,237	$13.90
Real Estate Taxes	$170,822	$171,600	$132,441	$132,441	$132,441	$1.04
Insurance	16,528	16,946	18,228	18,228	18,227	0.14
Management Fee	69,224	69,841	72,499	74,622	70,849	0.56
Other Operating Expenses	65,603	99,391	199,156	174,249	111,630	0.88
Total Operating Expenses	$322,177	$357,778	$422,324	$399,540	$333,148	$2.61
Net Operating Income	$1,408,432	$1,388,239	$1,390,159	$1,465,998	$1,438,089	$11.28
TI/LC	60,392	60,392	60,392	60,392	60,392	0.47
Replacement Reserves	19,119	19,119	19,119	19,119	19,119	0.15
Net Cash Flow	$1,328,921	$1,308,728	$1,310,648	$1,386,488	$1,358,578	$10.66

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, lease cancellation income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

B-139

HOUSTON HOTEL PORTFOLIO

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	2	Loan Seller		CGMRC
Location (City/State)	Various, Texas	Cut-off Date Principal Balance		$14,000,000
Property Type	Hospitality	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per Room		$88,050.31
Size (Rooms)	159	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance		1.5%
Total TTM Occupancy as of 6/30/2015	71.6%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans		None
Owned TTM Occupancy as of 6/30/2015	71.6%	Type of Security		Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	Various / Various	Mortgage Rate		4.7100%
Appraised Value	$21,700,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)		120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)		360
		Original Interest-Only Period (Months)		0
Underwritten Revenues	$5,158,592	Borrower Sponsor(1)		Seema Dayal and Jayesh Dayal
Underwritten Expenses	$3,343,929
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$1,814,662	Escrows
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$1,608,319		Upfront	Monthly
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio	64.5%	Taxes	$253,579	$28,175
Maturity Date LTV Ratio	52.5%	Insurance	$35,658	$8,914
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	2.08x / 1.84x	FF&E(2)	$0	$17,307
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	13.0% / 11.5%	Other	$0	$0

Sources and Uses 

Sources	$	%		Uses	$	%
Loan Amount	$14,000,000	100.0	%	Loan Payoff	$12,954,185	92.5	%
Other Sources	972	0.0		Principal Equity Distribution	473,575	3.4
				Reserves	289,236	2.1
				Closing Costs	283,976	2.0
Total Sources	$14,000,972	100.0	%	Total Uses	$14,000,972	100.0	%

(1)

Seema Dayal and Jayesh Dayal are the non-recourse carveout guarantors under the Houston Hotel Portfolio Loan.

(2)

The borrower is required to make monthly deposits equal to 1/12th of 4% of the greater of (1) annual gross revenues for the preceding calendar year and (2) the projected annual gross revenues for the calendar year in which the monthly payment date occurs as set forth in the approved annual budget. The current monthly FF&E escrow of $17,307 is 1/12th of 4% of the gross revenues for the preceding calendar year.

The following table presents certain information relating to the Houston Hotel Portfolio Properties:

Property	Cut-off Date Allocated Loan Amount	% of Portfolio Cut-off Date Allocated Loan Amount	Rooms	Underwritten NCF	Year Built / Latest Renovation	Appraised Value	Appraisal Date
Holiday Inn Express  West Road	$8,500,000	60.7%	87	$958,482	2010 / NAP	$13,300,000	5/19/2015
Hampton Inn Port Arthur	5,500,000	39.3	72	649,837	2007 / 2014	8,400,000	5/19/2015
Total	$14,000,000	100.0%	159	$1,608,319		$21,700,000

TTM June 30, 2015 Penetration Rates

	Competitive Set(1)			TTM 6/30/2015(1)			Penetration Rates(1)
Property	Occ.	ADR	RevPAR	Occ.	ADR	RevPAR	Occ.	ADR	RevPAR
Holiday Inn Express  West Road	66.7%	$135.91	$90.64	68.9%	$128.93	$88.77	103.2%	94.9%	97.9%
Hampton Inn Port Arthur	62.3%	$105.90	$65.99	74.8%	$116.93	$87.44	120.0%	110.4%	132.5%
Total / Wtd. Avg.	64.7%	$122.32	$79.48	71.5%	$123.50	$88.17	110.6%	101.0%	110.9%

(1) Source: June 2015 travel research report.

The following table presents certain information relating to historical occupancy, ADR and RevPAR at the Houston Hotel Portfolio Properties:

Houston Hotel Portfolio⁽¹⁾  

	TTM 6/30/2013(1)			TTM 6/30/2014(1)			TTM 6/30/2015(1)			Underwritten
Property	Occ.	ADR	RevPAR	Occ.	ADR	RevPAR	Occ.	ADR	RevPAR	Occ.	ADR	RevPAR
Holiday Inn Express  West Road	66.5%	$123.91	$82.44	70.4%	$129.55	$91.24	68.9%	$128.93	$88.77	68.9%	$128.51	$88.48
Hampton Inn Port Arthur	76.5%	$106.69	$81.60	70.9%	$109.79	$77.80	74.8%	$116.93	$87.44	74.8%	$116.49	$87.11
Total / Wtd. Avg.	71.0%	$116.11	$82.06	70.6%	$120.60	$85.15	71.5%	$123.50	$88.17	71.6%	$122.82	$87.86

(1) Source: June 2015 travel research report.

B-140

HOUSTON HOTEL PORTFOLIO 

n Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow, on an aggregate basis and per room, at the Houston Hotel Portfolio Properties:

Cash Flow Analysis

	2012	2013	2014	TTM 6/30/2015	Underwritten	Underwritten $ per Room
Room Revenue	$4,603,360	$4,742,992	$5,086,520	$5,099,160	$5,099,160	$32,070
Food & Beverage Revenue	0	0	0	0	0	0
Other Revenue(1)	78,036	70,564	54,145	65,240	59,432	374
Total Revenue	$4,681,395	$4,813,556	$5,140,665	$5,164,400	$5,158,592	$32,444
Room Expense	$679,279	$1,007,855	$1,046,322	$1,006,138	$1,040,630	$6,545
Food & Beverage Expense	0	0	0	0	0	0
Other Expense	79,161	80,165	77,933	77,109	78,492	494
Total Departmental Expense	$758,440	$1,088,020	$1,124,256	$1,083,247	$1,119,122	$7,039
Total Undistributed Expense	1,820,517	1,555,407	1,711,064	1,720,863	1,733,672	10,904
Total Fixed Charges(2)	366,452	388,105	457,219	420,439	491,135	3,089
Total Operating Expenses	$2,945,409	$3,031,532	$3,292,539	$3,224,549	$3,343,929	$21,031
Net Operating Income	$1,735,986	$1,782,024	$1,848,126	$1,939,851	$1,814,662	$11,413
FF&E	187,256	192,542	205,627	206,576	206,344	1,298
Net Cash Flow	$1,548,730	$1,589,482	$1,642,499	$1,733,275	$1,608,319	$10,115

(1) Other Revenue consists of meeting room rentals, guest laundry, pet/smoking fees, pantry shop revenues and other miscellaneous income.

(2) Total Fixed Charges include real estate taxes and insurance.

B-141

COURTYARD AT CEDAR HILLS

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	1	Loan Seller		RMF
Location (City/State)	Beaverton, Oregon	Cut-off Date Principal Balance		$13,000,000
Property Type	Multifamily	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per Unit		$89,655.17
Size (Units)	145	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance		1.4%
Total Occupancy as of 7/1/2015	98.6%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans		None
Owned Occupancy as of 7/1/2015	98.6%	Type of Security		Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	1969, 1975 / NAP	Mortgage Rate		4.6300%
Appraised Value	$20,000,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)		120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)		NAP
		Original Interest Only Period (Months)		120
		Borrower Sponsor(1)	Michael Rhodes Green, Scott Michael McWhorter and Virtu Investments Multifamily Opportunity Fund-III, LP
Underwritten Revenues	$1,747,558
Underwritten Expenses	$672,172	Escrows
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$1,075,386			Upfront	Monthly
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$1,036,236	Taxes		$133,261	$12,692
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio	65.0%	Insurance		$24,833	$2,150
Maturity Date LTV Ratio	65.0%	Replacement Reserves		$0	$3,263
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	1.76x / 1.70x	TI/LC		$0	$0
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	8.3% / 8.0%	Other(2)		$4,563	$0

Sources and Uses
Sources	$	%		Uses	$	%
Mortgage Loan Amount	$13,000,000	64.3	%	Purchase Price	$19,850,000	98.1	%
Principal’s New Cash Contribution	$7,068,021	34.9		Closing Costs	$215,364	1.1
Other Sources	$160,000	0.8		Reserves	$162,657	0.8
Total Sources	$20,228,021	100.0	%	Total Uses	$20,228,021	100.0	%

(1) Michael Rhodes Green, Scott Michael McWhorter, and Virtu Investments Multifamily Opportunity Fund-III, LP are the non-recourse carveouts guarantors under the Courtyard at Cedar Hills Loan.

(2) Other Upfront reserve represents an immediate repair reserve of $4,563.

The following table presents certain information relating to the units and rent at the Courtyard at Cedar Hills Property:

Unit Mix⁽¹⁾

Unit Type	Occupied Units(1)	Vacant Units	Total Units	Average SF per Unit	Monthly Market Rent per Unit	Annual Market Rent	Monthly Actual Rent per Unit	Underwritten Annual Rent
1 bedroom /1 bath (A)	7	1	8	614	$790	$66,360	$775	$65,076
1 bedroom /1 bath (B)	45	1	46	743	850	459,000	819	442,380
2 bedroom /1 bath (A)	6	0	6	757	950	68,400	970	69,804
2 bedroom /1 bath (B)	31	0	31	886	950	353,400	904	336,288
2 bedroom /2 bath	12	0	12	896	975	140,400	976	140,484
3 bedroom /1.5 bath	42	0	42	1,157	1,155	582,120	1,077	542,705
Total / Avg.	143	2	145	900	$971	$1,666,058	$930	$1,596,737

(1) As provided by the borrower per the July 1, 2015 rent roll.

The following table presents certain information relating to historical leasing at the Courtyard at Cedar Hills Property:

Historical Leased %⁽¹⁾

	2012	2013	2014(2)	As of 7/1/2015
Owned Space	94.5%	95.5%	98.1%	98.6%

(1) As provided by the borrower and reflects occupancy as of December 31 for the indicated year unless specified otherwise.

(2) 2014 Occupancy represents occupancy as of June 2014.

B-142

COURTYARD AT CEDAR HILLS

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Courtyard at Cedar Hills Property:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

	2012	2013	2014 Annualized	TTM 6/30/2015	Underwritten(2)	Underwritten $ per Unit
Base Rent	$1,350,530	$1,424,690	$1,517,670	$1,565,671	$1,596,737	$11,012
Gross Up Vacancy	0	0	0	0	43,740	302
Goss Potential Rent	$1,350,530	$1,424,690	$1,517,670	$1,565,671	$1,640,477	$11,314
Vacancy, Credit Loss & Concessions	(80,379)	(65,598)	(29,597)	(32,337)	(81,716)	(564)
Total Rent Revenue	$1,270,151	$1,359,091	$1,488,073	$1,533,334	$1,558,761	$10,750
Other Revenue (3)	140,921	159,896	177,774	188,797	188,797	1,302
Effective Gross Income	$1,411,072	$1,518,987	$1,665,847	$1,722,131	$1,747,558	$12,052
Total Operating Expenses	$693,449	$676,168	$607,195	$625,530	$672,172	$4,636
Net Operating Income	$717,623	$842,819	$1,058,653	$1,096,601	$1,075,386	$7,416
Replacement Reserves	0	0	0	0	39,150	270
Net Cash Flow	$717,623	$842,819	$1,058,653	$1,096,601	$1,036,236	$7,146

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) Underwritten cash flow is based on July 1, 2015 rent roll.

(3) Other Revenue includes RUBS, laundry revenue and other miscellaneous revenues.

B-143

PECKHAM SQUARE

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	1	Loan Seller			GSMC
Location (City/State)	Reno, Nevada	Cut-off Date Principal Balance			$12,450,000
Property Type	Retail	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per SF			$93.39
Size (SF)	133,318	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance			1.3%
Total Occupancy as of 8/1/2015	96.3%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans			None
Owned Occupancy as of 8/1/2015	96.3%	Type of Security			Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	1974 / 1990, 2005	Mortgage Rate			4.2385%
Appraised Value	$16,800,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)			120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)			360
		Original Interest Only Term (Months)		24
		Borrower Sponsor(1)		Kamran Farhadi and Parviz M. Hariri
Underwritten Revenues	$1,698,154
Underwritten Expenses	$333,807		Escrows
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$1,364,347		Upfront		Monthly
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$1,211,858	Taxes	$274		$10,718
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio	74.1%	Insurance	$5,382		$2,691
Maturity Date LTV Ratio	62.8%	Replacement Reserves	$0		$3,333
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	1.86x / 1.65x	TI/LC(2)	$0		$9,583
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	11.0% / 9.7%	Other(3)	$223,151		$0

Sources and Uses
Sources	$	%		Uses	$	%
Loan Amount	$12,450,000	100.0	%	Loan Payoff	$11,039,934	88.7	%
				Principal Equity Distribution	864,174	6.9
				Closing Costs	317,085	2.5
				Reserves	228,807	1.8
Total Sources	$12,450,000	100.0	%	Total Uses	$12,450,000	100.0	%

(1) Kamran Farhadi and Parviz Hariri are the non-recourse carveout guarantors under the Peckham Square Loan.

(2) TI/LC reserve is capped at $400,000.

(3) Other reserves represent an unfunded obligation ($130,000) and a deferred maintenance reserve ($93,151).

The following table presents certain information relating to the major tenants (of which, certain tenants may have co-tenancy provisions) at the Peckham Square Property:

Largest Tenants Based on Underwritten Base Rent

Tenant Name	Credit Rating (Fitch/MIS/S&P)(1)	Tenant GLA	% of GLA		UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent		UW Base Rent $ per SF(2)	Lease Expiration	Tenant Sales $ per SF(3)	Occupancy Cost	Renewal / Extension Options
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.	NR / B3 / B	24,700	18.5	%	$305,539	20.2	%	$12.37	12/31/2020	$136	9.1%	1, 5-year option
Grocery Outlet, Inc.	NR / NR / NR	27,300	20.5		285,036	18.8		10.44	6/13/2020	NA	NA	2, 5-year options
Savers	NR / NR / B-	28,600	21.5		276,149	18.2		9.66	12/1/2025	NA	NA	2, 5-year options
King Buffet	NR / NR / NR	11,067	8.3		216,000	14.3		19.52	7/20/2020	NA	NA	2, 5-year options
Harbor Freight Tools	NR / NR / BB-	16,426	12.3		185,560	12.3		11.30	5/31/2019	NA	NA	1, 5-year option
Family Dollar	NR / Ba1 / NR	12,015	9.0		117,000	7.7		9.74	3/31/2022	NA	NA	3, 5-year options
Rent A Center	NR / B1 / BB	4,808	3.6		76,928	5.1		16.00	10/31/2018	NA	NA	1, 5-year option
Ace Grading & Paving	NR / NR / NR	3,500	2.6		36,000	2.4		10.29	4/30/2020	NA	NA	1, 5-year option
Clear Channel Outdoor	NR / NR / NR	1	0.0		15,000	1.0		15,000.00	1/31/2020	NA	NA	NA
Largest Tenants		128,417	96.3	%	$1,513,212	100.0	%	$11.67
Remaining Owned Tenants		0	0.0		0	0.0		0.00
Vacant (Owned Space)		4,901	3.7		0	0.0		0.00
Total / Wtd. Avg. All Tenants		133,318	100.0	%	$1,513,212	100.0	%	$11.67

(1) Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease.

(2) Weighted average UW Base Rent $ per SF does not include Clear Channel Outdoor.

(3) Tenant Sales $ per SF are as of 12/31/2014 for Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.

B-144

PECKHAM SQUARE

The following table presents the lease rollover schedule at the Peckham Square Property, based on initial lease expiration dates:

Lease Expiration Schedule⁽¹⁾

Year Ending December 31,	Expiring Owned GLA	% of Owned GLA		Cumulative % of Owned GLA	UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent		UW Base Rent $ per SF(2)	# of Expiring Tenants
MTM	0	0.0	%	0.0%	$0	0.0	%	$0.00	0
2015	0	0.0		0.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2016	0	0.0		0.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2017	0	0.0		0.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2018	4,808	3.6		3.6%	76,928	5.1		16.00	1
2019	16,426	12.3		15.9%	185,560	12.3		11.30	1
2020	66,568	49.9		65.9%	857,575	56.7		12.88	5
2021	0	0.0		65.9%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2022	12,015	9.0		74.9%	117,000	7.7		9.74	1
2023	0	0.0		74.9%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2024	0	0.0		74.9%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2025	28,600	21.5		96.3%	276,149	18.2		9.66	1
2026 & Thereafter	0	0.0		96.3%	0	0.0		0.00	0
Vacant	4,901	3.7		100.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
Total / Wtd. Avg.	133,318	100.0	%		$1,513,212	100.0	%	$11.67	9

(1) Calculated based on approximate square footage occupied by each Owned Tenant.

(2) Weighted average UW Base Rent $ per SF does not include Clear Channel Outdoor.

The following table presents certain information relating to historical occupancy at the Peckham Square Property:

Historical Leased %⁽¹⁾

2012	2013	2014	As of 5/31/2015
93.0%	93.0%	93.0%	96.0%

(1) As provided by the borrower and reflects year-end occupancy for the indicated year (or other 12-month period) unless specified otherwise.

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Peckham Square Property:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

	2013	2014	TTM 5/31/2015	Underwritten(2)	Underwritten $ per SF
Base Rent	$1,339,401	$1,314,694	$1,338,449	$1,513,212	$11.35
Total Reimbursables	268,261	266,470	280,544	262,364	1.97
Market Revenue on Vacant Units	0	0	0	83,629	0.63
Vacancy & Credit Loss	0	0	0	(161,051)	(1.21)
Other Revenue	0	403	403	0	0.00
Effective Gross Income	$1,607,662	$1,581,567	$1,619,396	$1,698,154	$12.74
Real Estate Taxes	$105,533	$104,524	$104,524	$109,176	$0.82
Insurance	22,386	26,933	26,933	21,092	0.16
Utilities	53,231	26,850	22,589	41,055	0.31
Repairs & Maintenance	52,409	35,015	34,719	52,436	0.39
Management Fee	87,035	72,180	79,657	67,926	0.51
Professional Fees	2,045	2,398	1,148	2,096	0.02
Other Expenses	7,524	42,544	2,688	40,026	0.30
Total Operating Expenses	$330,163	$310,444	$272,258	$333,807	$2.50
Net Operating Income	$1,277,499	$1,271,122	$1,347,138	$1,364,347	$10.23
TI/LC	0	0	0	112,493	0.84
Replacement Reserves	0	0	0	39,995	0.30
Net Cash Flow	$1,277,499	$1,271,122	$1,347,138	$1,211,858	$9.09

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) Underwritten Base Rent is based on contractual rents as of August 1, 2015 and rent steps through May 31, 2016.

B-145

MASON TOWN HOUSE SUITES & PARK VIEW BUSINESS CENTER

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	2	Loan Seller		CGMRC
Location (City/State)	DeKalb, Illinois	Cut-off Date Principal Balance		$11,700,000
Property Type(1)	Various	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per SF		$55.90
Size (SF)(1)	Various	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance		1.2%
Total Occupancy as of 6/4/2015 and 4/28/2015	96.8%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans		None
Owned Occupancy as of 6/4/2015 and 4/28/2015	96.8%	Type of Security		Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	Various / NAP	Mortgage Rate		4.9000%
Appraised Value	$15,600,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)		120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)		360
		Original Interest Only Term (Months)		48
		Borrower Sponsor(2)	James C. Mason and Linda R. Mason
Underwritten Revenues	$1,750,588
Underwritten Expenses	$692,556	Escrows
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$1,058,032		Upfront	Monthly
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$1,005,171	Taxes	$0	$31,637
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio	75.0%	Insurance	$0	$0
Maturity Date LTV Ratio	67.7%	Replacement Reserves(3)	$0	$2,126
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	1.42x / 1.35x	TI/LC(4)	$75,000	$0
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	9.0% / 8.6%	Other(5)	$40,000	$0

Sources and Uses
Sources	$	%	Uses	$	%
Loan Amount	$11,700,000	99.6%	Loan Payoff	$10,836,000	92.3%
Other Sources	45,000	0.4	Closing Costs	455,740	3.9
			Principal Equity Distribution	338,259	2.9
			Reserves	115,000	1.0
Total Sources	$11,745,000	100.0%	Total Uses	$11,745,000	100.0%

(1) The Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center Properties consist of a 65-unit, multifamily complex (the “Mason Town House Suites Property”) and a 44,081 square foot retail center (the “Park View Business Center Property”).

(2) James C. Mason and Linda R. Mason are non-recourse carveout guarantors under the Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center Loan.

(3) Replacement reserve is capped at $51,014.

(4) TI/LC reserve is capped at $75,000.

(5) Upfront other reserve is comprised of $40,000 for an environment holdback.

The following table presents certain information relating to the units and rent at the Mason Town House Suites Property:

Unit Type	Occupied Units(1)	Vacant Units(1)	Total Units	Average SF per Unit	Monthly Market Rent per Unit(2)	Yearly Market Rent(2)	Monthly Actual Rent per Unit(3)	Yearly Actual Rent(3)
4 Bed / 3 Bath	64	1	65	2,542	$1,500	$1,170,000	$1,503	$1,154,304

(1) As provided by the borrower.

(2) Source: Appraisal.

(3) Yearly rents are calculated based on currently occupied units per the rent roll dated June 4, 2015.

B-146

MASON TOWN HOUSE SUITES & PARK VIEW BUSINESS CENTER

The following table presents certain information relating to the major tenants at the Park View Business Center Property:

Largest Owned Tenants Based on Underwritten Base Rent

Tenant Name	Credit Rating (Fitch/MIS/S&P)(1)	Tenant GLA	% of GLA		UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent		UW Base Rent $ per SF	Lease Expiration	Renewal / Extension Options
Finest Furniture	NR / NR / NR	8,800	20.0	%	$97,075	20.0	%	$11.03	11/30/2016	2, 5-year options
Communications Services, Inc.	NR / NR / NR	7,817	17.7		77,746	16.0		9.95	3/30/2016	NA
Kloberdanz DDS	NR / NR / NR	2,170	4.9		39,724	8.2		18.31	8/31/2020	NA
Secretary of State	NR / NR / NR	2,640	6.0		37,884	7.8		14.35	6/30/2017	NA
Pancake House	NR / NR / NR	3,000	6.8		33,120	6.8		11.04	12/8/2019	NA
IL Dept of Human Services	NR / NR / NR	2,307	5.2		31,837	6.6		13.80	12/14/2018	1, 5-year option
ComCast	NR / NR / NR	2,850	6.5		28,346	5.8		9.95	3/31/2016	1, 5-year option
Cash Store	NR / NR / NR	1,800	4.1		26,760	5.5		14.87	6/30/2019	2, 5-year options
Timothy J. Duez, D.D.S.	NR / NR / NR	1,680	3.8		26,196	5.4		15.59	1/31/2019	1 option(2)
Frederick D. Peltz D.D.	NR / NR / NR	1,918	4.4		23,196	4.8		12.09	8/31/2018	NA
Ten Largest Owned Tenants		34,982	79.4	%	$421,884	87.0	%	$12.06
Remaining Tenants		5,039	11.4		63,000	13.0		12.50
Vacant (Owned Space)		4,060	9.2		0	0.0		0.00
Total / Wtd. Avg. All Tenants		44,081	100.0	%	$484,884	100.0	%	$12.12

(1) Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease.

(2) The extension option term for Timothy J. Duez, D.D.S. was not disclosed.

The following table presents the lease rollover schedule at the Park View Business Center Property, based on initial lease expiration dates:

Lease Expiration Schedule⁽¹⁾

Year Ending December 31,	Expiring Owned GLA	% of Owned GLA		Cumulative % of Owned GLA	UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent		UW Base Rent $ per SF	# of Expiring Tenants
MTM	0	0.0	%	0.0%	$0	0.0	%	$0.00	0
2015	250	0.6		0.6%	3,780	0.8		15.12	1
2016	19,467	44.2		44.7%	203,167	41.9		10.44	4
2017	4,224	9.6		54.3%	58,284	12.0		13.80	2
2018	5,905	13.4		67.7%	73,513	15.2		12.45	3
2019	7,380	16.7		84.4%	98,016	20.2		13.28	4
2020	2,170	4.9		89.4%	39,724	8.2		18.31	1
2021	0	0.0		89.4%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2022	0	0.0		89.4%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2023	0	0.0		89.4%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2024	0	0.0		89.4%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2025	0	0.0		89.4%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2026 & Thereafter	625	1.4		90.8%	8,400	1.7		13.44	1
Vacant	4,060	9.2		100.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
Total / Wtd. Avg.	44,081	100.0	%		$484,884	100.0	%	$12.12	16

(1) The square footage, base rent, and subsequent calculations referenced in the chart pertains to the Park View Business Center Property only.

The following table presents certain information relating to historical leasing at the Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center Properties:

Historical Leased %⁽¹⁾

	2013	2014	Various(2)
Owned Space at Mason Town House Suites Property	NAV	99.6%	98.5%
Owned Space at Park View Business Center Property	74.4%	85.0%	90.8%

(1) As provided by the borrower and which reflects average occupancy for the specified year unless otherwise specified.

(2) The occupancy date for the Mason Town House Suites Property and the Park View Business Center Property are June 4, 2015 and April 28, 2015, respectively.

B-147

MASON TOWN HOUSE SUITES & PARK VIEW BUSINESS CENTER

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Mason Town House Suites & Park View Business Center Properties:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾

	2012	2013	2014	TTM 4/30/2015	Underwritten	Underwritten $ per SF
Base Rent	$1,484,864	$1,483,822	$1,669,053	$1,733,702	$1,637,727	$7.82
Contractual Rent Steps	0	0	0	0	19,353	0.09
Gross Up Vacancy	0	0	0	0	56,840	0.27
Total Rent	$1,484,864	$1,483,822	$1,669,053	$1,733,702	$1,713,920	$8.19
Total Reimbursables	39,919	31,322	43,499	46,171	38,247	0.18
Other Income	96,581	97,367	113,347	116,037	116,147	0.55
Vacancy & Credit Loss	0	0	0	0	(117,726)	(0.56	)
Effective Gross Income	$1,621,364	$1,612,511	$1,825,899	$1,895,910	$1,750,588	$8.36
Real Estate Taxes	$339,502	$344,528	$359,737	$359,737	$367,523	$1.76
Insurance	38,006	31,764	33,099	33,497	37,424	0.18
Management Fee	64,855	64,500	73,036	75,837	70,023	0.33
Other Operating Expenses	181,643	188,857	204,223	216,267	217,586	1.04
Total Operating Expenses	$624,006	$629,649	$670,095	$685,338	$692,556	$3.31
Net Operating Income	$997,358	$982,862	$1,155,804	$1,210,572	$1,058,032	$5.05
TI/LC	0	0	0	0	27,354	0.13
Replacement Reserves	0	0	0	0	25,507	0.12
Net Cash Flow	$997,358	$982,862	$1,155,804	$1,210,572	$1,005,171	$4.80

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, lease cancellation income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) Underwritten cash flow represents the consolidated cash flow for the Mason Town House Suites Property and the Park View Business Center Property.

B-148

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

B-149

DOVER MARKETPLACE

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	1	Loan Seller		GSMC
Location (City/State)	Dover, Pennsylvania	Cut-off Date Principal Balance		$11,250,000
Property Type	Retail	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per SF		$184.29
Size (SF)	61,044	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance		1.2%
Total Occupancy as of 7/9/2015	100.0%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans		None
Owned Occupancy as of 7/9/2015	100.0%	Type of Security		Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	2001 / NAP	Mortgage Rate		4.5475%
Appraised Value	$15,000,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)		120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)		360
		Original Interest Only Term (Months)		60
		Borrower Sponsor(1)	Robert V. Gothier, Sr., Robert V. Gothier, Jr., Kevin J. Nielsen and Dennis J. Schmidt
Underwritten Revenues	$1,378,039
Underwritten Expenses	$338,618		Escrows
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$1,039,421		Upfront	Monthly
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$993,759	Taxes	$87,649	$10,956
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio	75.0%	Insurance	$2,067	$1,034
Maturity Date LTV Ratio	68.7%	Replacement Reserves(2)	$0	$1,461
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	1.51x / 1.44x	TI/LC(3)	$0	$4,167
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	9.2% / 8.8%	Other(4)	$6,323	$0

Sources and Uses
Sources	$	%	Uses	$	%
Loan Amount	$11,250,000	100.0%	Loan Payoff	$7,366,389	65.5%
			Principal Equity Distribution	3,582,499	31.8
			Closing Costs	205,073	1.8
			Reserves	96,039	0.9
Total Sources	$11,250,000	100.0%	Total Uses	$11,250,000	100.0%

(1) Robert V. Gothier, Sr., Robert V. Gothier, Jr., Kevin J. Nielsen and Dennis J. Schmidt are the non-recourse carveout guarantors under the Dover Marketplace Loan.

(2) The replacement reserve is capped at $50,000.

(3) The TI/LC reserve is capped at $150,000.

(4) Other reserve represents a rent concession reserve ($6,323).

The following table presents certain information relating to the major tenants (of which, certain tenants may have co-tenancy provisions) at the Dover Marketplace Property:

Ten Largest Tenants Based on Underwritten Base Rent

						% of
						Total UW		UW Base		Tenant
	Credit Rating	Tenant	% of		UW Base	Base		Rent	Lease	Sales $	Occupancy	Renewal /
Tenant Name	(Fitch/MIS/S&P)(1)	GLA	GLA		Rent	Rent		$ per SF	Expiration	per SF(2)	Cost	Extension Options
Giant Foods	BBB / Baa2 / BBB	44,744	73.3	%	$832,686	74.2	%	$ 18.61	9/30/2021	$634.66	3.7%	6, 5-year options
M&T Bank	A- / A3 / A-	3,100	5.1		90,750	8.1		29.27	10/31/2021	NA	NA	2, 5-year options
Advantage Physical Therapy	NR / NR / NR	2,400	3.9		35,856	3.2		14.94	1/31/2019	NA	NA	1, 6-year option
Giant Gas(3)	BBB / Baa2 / BBB	2,400	3.9		27,500	2.5		11.46	9/30/2021	NA	NA	6, 5-year options
China One	NR / NR / NR	1,200	2.0		21,900	2.0		18.25	11/30/2021	NA	NA	NA
Great Clips	NR / NR / NR	1,200	2.0		20,400	1.8		17.00	9/30/2018	NA	NA	2, 5-year options
Fox’s Pizza	NR / NR / NR	1,200	2.0		19,752	1.8		16.46	9/30/2018	NA	NA	NA
Subway	NR / NR / NR	1,200	2.0		19,248	1.7		16.04	4/30/2017	NA	NA	5, 5-year options
Nail Salon	NR / NR / NR	1,200	2.0		18,600	1.7		15.50	8/31/2017	NA	NA	NA
Edward Jones(4)	NR / NR / NR	1,200	2.0		18,000	1.6		15.00	11/30/2017	NA	NA	1, 5-year option
Ten Largest Owned Tenants		59,844	98.0	%	$1,104,692	98.5	%	$18.46
Remaining Owned Tenant		1,200	2.0		16,800	1.5		14.00
Vacant (Owned Space)		0	0.0		0	0.0		0.00
Total / Wtd. Avg. All Owned Tenants		61,044	100.0	%	$1,121,492	100.0	%	$18.37

(1) Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease.

(2) Tenant Sales $ per SF are as of 12/31/2014 for Giant Foods.

(3) Giant Gas has the right to terminate its lease with written notice of not less than three months and not more than 12 months.

(4) Edward Jones has the option to terminate its lease upon 60 days’ prior written notice to the landlord.

B-150

DOVER MARKETPLACE

The following table presents the lease rollover schedule at the Dover Marketplace Property, based on initial lease expiration dates:

Lease Expiration Schedule⁽¹⁾

								UW Base
Year Ending	Expiring Owned	% of Owned		Cumulative % of	UW	% of Total UW		Rent	# of Expiring
December 31,	GLA	GLA		Owned GLA	Base Rent	Base Rent		$ per SF	Tenants
MTM	0	0.0	%	0.0%	$0	0.0	%	$0.00	0
2015	0	0.0		0.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2016	0	0.0		0.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2017	3,600	5.9		5.9%	55,848	5.0		15.51	3
2018	3,600	5.9		11.8%	56,952	5.1		15.82	3
2019	2,400	3.9		15.7%	35,856	3.2		14.94	1
2020	0	0.0		15.7%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2021	51,444	84.3		100.0%	972,836	86.7		18.91	4
2022	0	0.0		100.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2023	0	0.0		100.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2024	0	0.0		100.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2025	0	0.0		100.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
2026 & Thereafter	0	0.0		100.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
Vacant	0	0.0		100.0%	0	0.0		0.00	0
Total / Wtd. Avg.	61,044	100.0	%		$1,121,492	100.0	%	$18.37	11

(1) Calculated based on approximate square footage occupied by each Owned Tenant.

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Dover Marketplace Property:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

						Underwritten
	2012	2013	2014	Underwritten(2)		$ per SF
Base Rent	$1,076,696	$1,081,210	$1,101,017	$1,121,492		$18.37
Contractual Credit Rent Steps(3)	0	0	0	45,942		0.75
Gross Up Vacancy	0	0	0	0		0.00
Total Rent	$1,076,696	$1,081,210	$1,101,017	$1,167,434		$19.12
Total Reimbursables	189,594	217,398	231,470	263,116		4.31
Other Income	476	488	1,283	1,000		0.02
Vacancy & Credit Loss	0	0	0	(53,511	)	(0.88	)
Effective Gross Income	$1,266,766	$1,299,096	$1,333,770	$1,378,039		$22.57
Real Estate Taxes	$121,988	$125,967	$128,071	$130,685		$2.14
Insurance	7,640	8,569	13,471	12,404		0.20
Management Fee	43,060	43,188	43,971	55,122		0.90
Other Operating Expenses	71,759	107,907	102,231	140,408		2.30
Total Operating Expenses	$244,447	$285,631	$287,744	$338,618		$5.55
Net Operating Income	$1,022,319	$1,013,465	$1,046,027	$1,039,421		$17.03
TI/LC	0	0	0	28,133		0.46
Replacement Reserves	0	0	0	17,529		0.29
Net Cash Flow	$1,022,319	$1,013,465	$1,046,027	$993,759		$16.28

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) Underwritten Base Rent is based on contractual rents as of July 9, 2015 and rent steps through September 30, 2016.

(3) Underwritten Contractual Credit Rent Steps is the straight-line average of the incremental rent steps for credit tenants (Giant Foods, Giant Gas and M&T Bank) through the respective lease expiration.

B-151

LANIER CROSSING SHOPPING CENTER

Mortgaged Property Information		Mortgage Loan Information
Number of Mortgaged Properties	1	Loan Seller		RAIT Funding, LLC
Location (City/State)	Cumming, Georgia	Cut-off Date Principal Balance		$11,200,000
Property Type	Retail	Cut-off Date Principal Balance per SF		$101.82
Size (SF)	110,002	Percentage of Initial Pool Balance		1.2%
Total Occupancy as of 8/1/2015	93.1%	Number of Related Mortgage Loans		None
Owned Occupancy as of 8/1/2015	93.1%	Type of Security		Fee Simple
Year Built / Latest Renovation	1989 / NAP	Mortgage Rate		5.0100%
Appraised Value	$15,900,000	Original Term to Maturity (Months)		120
		Original Amortization Term (Months)		360
		Original Interest Only Period (Months)		NAP
		Borrower Sponsor(1)	David Sedgh and Jeffrey Brandler
Underwritten Revenues	$1,404,078
Underwritten Expenses	$363,799	Escrows
Underwritten Net Operating Income (NOI)	$1,040,279		Upfront	Monthly
Underwritten Net Cash Flow (NCF)	$957,777	Taxes	$137,523	$11,460
Cut-off Date LTV Ratio	70.4%	Insurance	$22,513	$2,501
Maturity Date LTV Ratio	57.9%	Replacement Reserves(2)	$0	$1,375
DSCR Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	1.44x / 1.33x	TI/LC(3)	$0	$5,500
Debt Yield Based on Underwritten NOI / NCF	9.3% / 8.6%	Other(4)	$359,320	$2,962

Sources and Uses
Sources	$	%	Uses	$	%
Loan Amount	$11,200,000	100.0%	Loan Payoff	$9,187,769	82.0	%
			Principal Equity Distribution	1,161,601	10.4
			Reserves	519,356	4.6
			Closing Costs	331,275	3.0
Total Sources	$11,200,000	100.0%	Total Uses	$11,200,000	100.0	%

(1) David Sedgh and Jeffrey Brandler jointly and severally guarantee the non-recourse carveouts under the Lanier Crossing Shopping Center Loan.

(2) Replacement Reserves are capped at $82,502, provided that monthly deposits will resume on the payment date after the reserve funds drop below $16,500.

(3) TI/LC Reserves are capped at $198,005, provided that monthly deposits will resume on the payment date after the reserve funds drop below the capped amount.

(4) Other upfront reserves include a deferred maintenance reserve ($29,581), a tenant rollover reserve ($17,773), and a roof replacement reserve ($311,966).

The following table presents certain information relating to the major tenants (of which, certain tenants may have co-tenancy provisions) at the Lanier Crossing Shopping Center Property:

Ten Largest Owned Tenants Based on Underwritten Base Rent

Tenant Name	Credit Rating (Fitch/MIS/S&P)(1)	Tenant GLA	% of GLA		UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent		UW Base Rent $ per SF	Lease Expiration	Renewal / Extension Options
Hobby Lobby	NR / NR / NR	54,154	49.2	%	$362,290	31.5	%	$6.69	5/31/2020	NA
Ichiban Asian Buffet	NR / NR / NR	7,850	7.1		78,500	6.8		10.00	8/31/2030	NA
Aaron’s Inc. (Gross Lease)	NR / NR / NR	7,000	6.4		98,000	8.5		14.00	4/30/2020	2, 5-year options
Stevi B’s Pizza	NR / NR / NR	4,184	3.8		62,760	5.5		15.00	12/31/2019	3, 5-year options
Steven’s Country Kitchen	NR / NR / NR	3,955	3.6		59,325	5.2		15.00	10/31/2018	NA
Dr. Sherwood DDS	NR / NR / NR	3,539	3.2		69,364	6.0		19.60	1/31/2020	1, 5-year option
Duron/Sherwin Williams Paint	A- / A2 / A	3,200	2.9		62,400	5.4		19.50	11/30/2022	1, 5-year option
Sally Beauty Supply-Cosmo Professional	NR / NR / NR	2,800	2.5		32,200	2.8		11.50	6/30/2016	1, 5-year option
Simply Southard Bakery	NR / NR / NR	1,680	1.5		31,298	2.7		18.63	11/30/2015	NA
Moto Asian Cuisine	NR / NR / NR	1,400	1.3		24,318	2.1		17.37	4/30/2017	1, 5-year option
Ten Largest Owned Tenants		89,762	81.6	%	$880,455	76.5	%	$9.81
Remaining Owned Tenants		12,700	11.5		270,768	23.5		21.32
Vacant Spaces (Owned Space)		7,540	6.9		0	0.0		0.00
Total / Wtd. Avg. All Owned Tenants(2)		110,002	100.0	%	$1,151,223	100.0	%	$10.47

(1) Certain ratings are those of the parent company whether or not the parent guarantees the lease.

(2) Taco Bell is the tenant of a ground leased outparcel, which is excluded from the total square footage. The underwritten base rent (annual) for the outparcel is $51,976.

B-152

LANIER CROSSING SHOPPING CENTER

The following table presents certain information relating to the lease rollover schedule at the Lanier Crossing Shopping Center Property, based on initial lease expirations:

Lease Expiration Schedule⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾

Year Ending December 31,	Expiring Owned GLA	% of Owned GLA	Cumulative % of Owned GLA	UW Base Rent	% of Total UW Base Rent	UW Base Rent $ per SF	# of Expiring Tenants
MTM	0	0.0%	0.0%	$0	0.0%	$0.00	0
2015	1,680	1.5	1.5%	31,298	2.7	18.63	1
2016	4,900	4.5	6.0%	64,456	5.6	13.15	3
2017	2,800	2.5	8.5%	45,318	3.9	16.19	2
2018	7,555	6.9	15.4%	136,073	11.8	18.01	4
2019	8,384	7.6	23.0%	178,324	15.5	21.27	5
2020	64,693	58.8	81.8%	529,654	46.0	8.19	3
2021	0	0.0	81.8%	0	0.0	0.00	0
2022	4,600	4.2	86.0%	87,600	7.6	19.04	2
2023	0	0.0	86.0%	0	0.0	0.00	0
2024	0	0.0	86.0%	0	0.0	0.00	0
2025	0	0.0	86.0%	0	0.0	0.00	0
2026 & Thereafter	7,850	7.1	93.1%	78,500	6.8	10.00	1
Vacant	7,540	6.9	100.0%	0	0.0	0.00	0
Total / Wtd. Avg.	110,002	100.0%		$1,151,223	100.0%	$10.47	21

(1) Calculated based on approximate square footage occupied by each Owned Tenant.

(2) Taco Bell is the tenant of a ground leased outparcel, which is excluded from the total square footage. The underwritten base rent (annual) for the outparcel is $51,976.

The following table presents certain information relating to historical leasing at the Lanier Crossing Shopping Center Property:

Historical Leased %⁽¹⁾

	2012(2)	TTM 2/28/2014	2014	As of 8/1/2015
Owned Space	NAP	85.3%	85.5%	93.1%

(1) As provided by the borrower and which represents average monthly occupancy as of December 31, for the indicated year unless specified otherwise.

(2) Historical occupancy is not available as the borrower acquired the property in February 2013.

■ Operating History and Underwritten Net Cash Flow. The following table presents certain information relating to the historical operating performance and the Underwritten Net Cash Flow at the Lanier Crossing Shopping Center Property:

Cash Flow Analysis⁽¹⁾

	TTM 2/28/2014	2014	TTM 6/30/2015	Underwritten(2)		Underwritten $ per SF
Base Rent	$982,885	$972,827	$1,023,915	$1,145,280		$10.41
Contractual Rent Steps	0	0	0	5,943		0.05
Gross Up Vacancy	0	0	0	157,528		1.43
Total Rent	$982,885	$972,827	$1,023,915	$1,308,751		$11.90
Total Reimbursables	182,460	190,677	208,429	252,286		2.29
Other Income	0	0	0	9,089		0.08
Vacancy & Credit Loss	0	0	0	(166,048	)	(1.51	)
Effective Gross Income	$1,165,345	$1,163,504	$1,232,344	$1,404,078		$12.76
Total Operating Expenses	$332,555	$341,272	$263,794	$363,799		$3.31
Net Operating Income	$832,790	$822,232	$968,550	$1,040,279		$9.46
TI/LC	0	0	0	16,500		0.15
Capital Expenditures	0	0	0	66,001		0.60
Net Cash Flow	$832,790	$822,232	$968,550	$957,777		$8.71

(1) Certain items such as straight line rent, interest expense, interest income, lease cancellation income, depreciation, amortization, debt service payments and any other non-recurring or non-operating items were excluded from the historical presentation and are not considered for the underwritten cash flow.

(2) Underwritten cash flow based on the August 1, 2015 rent roll with rent steps through February 1, 2016.

B-153

SUMMARY OF CERTAIN RISK FACTORS

Investors should review the Prospectus Supplement and the Base Prospectus, including the description of risk factors contained in the Prospectus Supplement and the Base Prospectus, prior to making a decision to invest in the certificates offered by this Term Sheet. The Prospectus Supplement and the Base Prospectus will include more complete descriptions of the risks described below as well as additional risks relating to, among other things, specific mortgage loans and specific property types. Any decision to invest in the offered certificates should be made after reviewing the Prospectus Supplement and the Base Prospectus, conducting such investigations as the investor deems necessary and consulting with the investor’s own legal, accounting and tax advisors in order to make an independent determination of the suitability and consequences of an investment in the offered certificates. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Term Sheet shall have the respective meanings assigned to such terms in the Prospectus Supplement or, if not defined in the Prospectus Supplement, in the Base Prospectus. 

■ The Volatile Economy, Credit Crisis and Downturn in the Real Estate Market Have Adversely Affected and May Continue to Adversely Affect the Value of CMBS

— In recent years, the real estate and securitization markets, including the market for commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), as well as global financial markets and the economy generally, have experienced significant dislocations, illiquidity and volatility. We cannot assure you that a dislocation in the CMBS market will not re-occur or become more severe.

■ The Offered Certificates May Not Be a Suitable Investment for You

— The offered certificates are not suitable investments for all investors. In particular, you should not purchase any class of offered certificates unless you understand and are able to bear the risk that the yield to maturity and the aggregate amount and timing of distributions on the offered certificates are subject to material variability from period to period and give rise to the potential for significant loss over the life of the offered certificates.

— An investment in the offered certificates should be considered only by sophisticated institutional investors with substantial investment experience with similar types of securities and who have conducted appropriate due diligence on the mortgage loans and the offered certificates.

■ The Offered Certificates Are Limited Obligations

— The offered certificates, when issued, will represent beneficial interests in the issuing entity. The offered certificates will not represent an interest in, or obligation of, the sponsors, the depositor, the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, the certificate administrator, the trustee, the underwriters, or any of their respective affiliates, or any other person.

— The primary assets of the issuing entity will be the notes evidencing the mortgage loans, and the primary security and source of payment for the mortgage loans will be the mortgaged properties and the other collateral described in the Prospectus Supplement. Payments on the offered certificates are expected to be derived from payments made by the borrowers on the mortgage loans.

■ Mortgage Loans Are Non-Recourse and Are Not Insured or Guaranteed

— The mortgage loans are not insured or guaranteed by any person or entity, governmental or otherwise.

— Investors should treat each mortgage loan as a non-recourse loan. If a default occurs, recourse generally may be had only against the specific properties and other assets that have been pledged to secure the loan. Consequently, payment prior to maturity is dependent primarily on the sufficiency of the net operating income of the mortgaged property. Payment at maturity is primarily dependent upon the market value of the mortgaged property and the borrower’s ability to sell or refinance the mortgaged property.

■ The Offered Certificates May Have Limited Liquidity and the Market Value of the Offered Certificates May Decline

— Your certificates will not be listed on any national securities exchange or traded on any automated quotation systems of any registered securities association, and there is currently no secondary market for your certificates. While we have been advised by the underwriters that one or more of them, or one or more of their affiliates, currently intend to make a market in the offered certificates, none of the underwriters has any obligation to do so, any market-making may be discontinued at any time, and we cannot assure you that an active secondary market for the offered certificates will develop.

— The market value of the offered certificates will also be influenced by the supply of and demand for CMBS generally. The supply of CMBS will depend on, among other things, the amount of commercial and multifamily mortgage loans, whether newly originated or held in portfolios, that are available for securitization.

■ Legal and Regulatory Provisions Affecting Investors Could Adversely Affect the Liquidity of the Offered Certificates

— We make no representation as to the proper characterization of the offered certificates for legal investment, financial institution regulatory, financial reporting or other purposes, as to the ability of particular investors to purchase the offered certificates under applicable legal investment or other restrictions or as to the consequences of an investment in the offered certificates for such purposes or under such restrictions. We note that regulatory or legislative provisions applicable to certain investors may have the effect of limiting or restricting their ability to hold or acquire CMBS, which in turn may adversely affect the ability of investors in the offered certificates who are not subject to those provisions to resell their certificates in the secondary market. For example:

B-154

SUMMARY OF CERTAIN RISK FACTORS (continued)

— Effective January 1, 2014, EU Regulation 575/2013 (the “CRR”) imposes on European Economic Area (“EEA”) credit institutions and investment firms investing in securitizations issued on or after January 1, 2011, or in securitizations issued prior to that date where new assets are added or substituted after December 31, 2014: (a) a requirement (the “Retention Requirement”) that the originator, sponsor or original lender of such securitization has explicitly disclosed that it will retain, on an ongoing basis, a material net economic interest which, in any event, shall not be less than 5%; and (b) a requirement (the “Due Diligence Requirement”) that the investing credit institution or investment firm has undertaken certain due diligence in respect of the securitization and the underlying exposures and has established procedures for monitoring them on an ongoing basis. National regulators in EEA member states are required to impose penal risk weights on securitization investments in respect of which the Retention Requirement or the Due Diligence Requirement has not been satisfied in any material respect by reason of the negligence or omission of the investing credit institution or investment firm. If the Retention Requirement or the Due Diligence Requirement is not satisfied in respect of a securitization investment held by a non-EEA subsidiary of an EEA credit institution or investment firm, then an additional risk weight may be applied to such securitization investment when taken into account on a consolidated basis at the level of the EEA credit institution or investment firm. Requirements similar to the Retention Requirement and the Due Diligence Requirement (the “Similar Requirements”): (i) apply to investments in securitizations by investment funds managed by EEA investment managers subject to EU Directive 2011/61/EU; and (ii) subject to the adoption of certain secondary legislation, will apply to investments in securitizations by EEA insurance and reinsurance undertakings and by EEA undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities. None of the originators, the sponsors, the depositor or the issuing entity intends to retain a material net economic interest in the securitization constituted by the issue of the certificates in accordance with Retention Requirement or to take any other action which may be required by EEA-regulated investors for the purposes of their compliance with Retention Requirement, the Due Diligence Requirement or Similar Requirements. Consequently, credit institutions, investment firms or the other types of EEA regulated investors mentioned above are unlikely to be able to hold the certificates. As a result, the price and liquidity of the offered certificates in the secondary market may be adversely affected. This could adversely affect your ability to transfer offered certificates or the price you may receive upon your sale of offered certificates.

— The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act enacted in the United States requires that federal banking agencies amend their regulations to remove reference to or reliance on credit agency ratings, including, but not limited to, those found in the federal banking agencies’ risk-based capital regulations. New capital regulations, which were adopted by the banking regulators in July 2013 and began phasing in on January 1, 2014, implement the increased capital requirements established under the Basel Accord. These new capital regulations eliminate reliance on credit ratings and otherwise alter, and in most cases increase, the capital requirements imposed on depository institutions and their holding companies, including with respect to ownership of asset-backed securities such as CMBS. As a result of these regulations, investments in CMBS like the certificates by institutions subject to the risk based capital regulations may result in greater capital charges to these financial institutions, and the treatment of CMBS for their regulatory capital purposes may otherwise be adversely affected. Such developments could reduce the attractiveness of investments in CMBS for such entities.

— Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act added a provision, commonly referred to as the “Volcker Rule,” to federal banking law to generally prohibit “banking entities” (which is broadly defined to include U.S. banks and bank holding companies and many non-U.S. banking entities, together with their respective subsidiaries and other affiliates) from (i) engaging in proprietary trading, (ii) acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in or sponsoring a “covered fund” and (iii) entering into certain relationships with such funds. Under the Volcker Rule, unless otherwise jointly determined by specified federal regulators, a “covered fund” does not include an issuer that may rely on an exclusion or exemption from the definition of “investment company” under the Investment Company Act other than the exclusions contained in Section 3(c)(1) and Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. The Volcker Rule became effective on July 21, 2012, and final regulations implementing the Volcker Rule were adopted on December 10, 2013 and became effective on April 1, 2014, with conformance required by July 21, 2015 (or by July 21, 2016 in respect of investments in and relationships with covered funds that were in place prior to December 31, 2013, with the possibility of a further one-year extension). Although prior to the deadlines for conformance, banking entities were or are required to make good-faith efforts to conform their activities and investments to the Volcker Rule, the general effects of the Volcker Rule remain uncertain. Any prospective investor in the certificates, including a U.S. or foreign bank or a subsidiary or other affiliate thereof, should consult its own legal advisors regarding such matters and other effects of the Volcker Rule.

— The Financial Accounting Standards Board has adopted changes to the accounting standards for structured products. These changes, or any future changes, may affect the accounting for entities such as the issuing entity, could under certain circumstances require an investor or its owner generally to consolidate the assets of the issuing entity in its financial statements and record third parties’ investments in the issuing entity as liabilities of that investor or owner or could otherwise adversely affect the manner in which the investor or its owner must report an investment in commercial mortgage-backed securities for financial reporting purposes.

— For purposes of the Secondary Mortgage Market Enhancement Act of 1984, as amended, no class of offered certificates will constitute “mortgage related securities”.

B-155

SUMMARY OF CERTAIN RISK FACTORS (continued)

■ Commercial and Multifamily Lending Is Dependent on Net Operating Income

— The repayment of the mortgage loans in the pool (or related loan combination) will be dependent upon the ability of the related mortgaged property to produce cash flow through the collection of rents. However, net operating income can be volatile and may be insufficient to cover debt service on a mortgage loan (or related loan combination) at any given time. The performance and/or value of a particular income-producing real property will depend on a number of variables, including but not limited to property type, geographic location, competition and sponsorship.

■ Risks Resulting from Various Concentrations

— The performance of the pool of mortgage loans may be adversely impacted as a result of (i) mortgage loans that account for a disproportionately large percentage of the pool’s aggregate principal balance, (ii) a concentration of mortgage loans secured by the same mortgaged property types, (iii) a concentration of mortgage loans secured by mortgaged properties located in a particular geographic area, (iv) a concentration of mortgage loans secured by mortgaged properties with the same tenant(s) and (v) a concentration of mortgage loans with the same borrower or related borrowers. The effect of loan pool losses will be more severe if the losses relate to mortgage loans that account for a disproportionately large percentage of the pool’s aggregate principal balance. Likewise, mortgaged properties in which a single tenant makes up a significant portion of the rental income are more susceptible to interruptions of cash flow if that tenant’s business operations are negatively impacted or if such tenant fails to renew its lease.

— A concentration of related borrowers, mortgaged property types, tenant occupancy or mortgaged properties in similar geographic regions can pose increased risks because a decline in the financial condition of the corporate family of the related borrowers, in a particular industry or business or in a particular geographic area would have a disproportionately large impact on the pool of mortgage loans.

■ Borrower May Be Unable to Repay Remaining Principal Balance on the Maturity Date

— Mortgage loans (or loan combinations) with substantial remaining principal balances at their stated maturity date involve greater risk than fully-amortizing mortgage loans. This is because the borrower may be unable to repay the mortgage loan at that time. A borrower’s ability to repay a mortgage loan (or loan combinations) on its stated maturity date typically will depend upon its ability either to refinance the mortgage loan (or loan combinations) or to sell the mortgaged property at a price sufficient to permit repayment.

■ The Timing of Prepayments and Repurchases May Change Your Anticipated Yield

— We are not aware of any relevant publicly available or authoritative statistics with respect to the historical prepayment experiences of commercial mortgage loans, including both voluntary prepayments, if permitted, and involuntary prepayments, such as prepayments resulting from casualty or condemnation, application of reserve funds, defaults and liquidations or repurchases resulting from breaches of representations and warranties or material document defects or purchases by the holder of a subordinate companion loan or a mezzanine lender pursuant to a purchase option or sales of defaulted mortgage loans.

— Any changes in the weighted average lives of your certificates may adversely affect your yield.

— Each sponsor is the sole warranting party in respect of the mortgage loans sold by such sponsor to the depositor and (except for KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC, and RAIT Funding, LLC, each of which has a back-up guarantor) the sole party with repurchase/substitution obligations in connection with a material breach of representation and warranty or a material document deficiency. We cannot assure you that the applicable sponsor (or sponsor guarantor, if applicable) will have the financial ability to repurchase or substitute any mortgage loan sold by it in connection with either a material breach of the applicable sponsor’s representations and warranties or any material document defects.

■ Litigation Regarding the Mortgaged Properties or Borrowers May Impair Your Distributions

— There may be (and there may exist from time to time) pending or threatened legal proceedings against, or disputes with, the borrowers, the property sponsors and the managers of the mortgaged properties and their respective affiliates arising out of their ordinary business. Any such litigation may materially impair distributions to certificateholders if borrowers or property sponsors must use property income or other income to pay judgments, legal fees or litigation costs. We cannot assure you that any litigation or dispute or any settlement of any litigation or dispute will not have a material adverse effect on your investment.

■ Appraisals May Not Reflect Current or Future Market Value of Each Property

— Appraisals were obtained with respect to each of the mortgaged properties at or about the time of origination of the applicable mortgage loan by the related originator, or at or around the time of the acquisition of the mortgage loan by the related sponsor. In general, appraisals represent the analysis and opinion of qualified appraisers and are not guarantees of present or future value.

— Prospective investors should consider that the information set forth in this Term Sheet regarding appraised values or loan to value ratios may not accurately reflect past, present or future market values of the mortgaged properties. Additionally, with respect to the appraisals setting forth assumptions as to the “as-is”, “as stabilized”, “prospective market value upon stabilization” or other values, prospective investors should consider that those assumptions may not be accurate and that the “as-is”, “as stabilized”, “prospective market value upon stabilization” or other values may not be the values of the related mortgaged properties prior to or at maturity.

B-156

SUMMARY OF CERTAIN RISK FACTORS (continued)

■ Adverse Environmental Conditions at or Near Mortgaged Properties May Result in Losses

— The issuing entity could become liable for a material adverse environmental condition at an underlying mortgaged property. Any such potential liability could reduce or delay payments on the offered certificates.

— Although an environmental report was prepared for each mortgaged property securing a mortgage loan in connection with origination, it is possible that the environmental reports and/or supplemental “Phase II” sampling did not reveal all environmental liabilities, or that there are material environmental liabilities of which we are not aware. Also, the environmental condition of the mortgaged properties in the future could be affected by the activities of tenants and occupants or by third parties unrelated to the borrowers.

■ Insurance May Not Be Available or Adequate

— Although the mortgaged properties are required to be insured, or permitted to be self-insured by a sole or significant tenant, against certain risks, there is a possibility of casualty loss with respect to the mortgaged properties for which insurance proceeds may not be adequate or which may result from risks not covered by insurance.

— Even if terrorism insurance is required by the loan documents for a mortgage loan, that requirement may be subject to a cap on the cost of the premium for terrorism insurance that a borrower is required to pay or a commercially reasonable standard on the availability of the insurance.

— We cannot assure you that terrorism insurance or the Terrorism Insurance Program will be available or provide sufficient protection against risks of loss on the mortgaged properties resulting from acts of terrorism.

■ The Mortgage Loan Sellers, the Sponsors and the Depositor Are Subject to Bankruptcy or Insolvency Laws That May Affect the Issuing Entity’s Ownership of the Mortgage Loans

— In the event of the bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or conservatorship of an originator, a mortgage loan seller or the depositor (or certain affiliates thereof), it is possible that the issuing entity’s right to payment from or ownership of certain of the mortgage loans could be challenged. If such challenge is successful, payments on the offered certificates would be reduced or delayed. Even if the challenge is not successful, payments on the offered certificates would be delayed while a court resolves the claim.

— An opinion of counsel will be rendered on the Closing Date to the effect that the transfer of the applicable mortgage loans by each mortgage loan seller to the depositor would generally be respected as a sale in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of such mortgage loan seller. Such opinions, however, are subject to various assumptions and qualifications, and there can be no assurance that a bankruptcy trustee (in the case of the mortgage loan sellers other than Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company), if applicable, or other interested party will not attempt to challenge the issuing entity’s right to payment with respect to the related mortgage loans. Legal opinions do not provide any guaranty as to what any particular court would actually decide, but rather an opinion as to the decision a court would reach if the issues were competently presented and the court followed existing precedent as to legal and equitable principles applicable in bankruptcy cases. In this regard, legal opinions on bankruptcy law matters have inherent limitations primarily because of the pervasive equity powers of bankruptcy courts, the overriding goal of reorganization to which other legal rights and other policies may be subordinated, the potential relevance to the exercise of judicial discretion of future arising facts and circumstances, and the nature of the bankruptcy process. As a result, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), a creditor, a bankruptcy trustee or another interested party, including an entity transferring a mortgage loan as debtor-in-possession, could still attempt to assert that the transfer of a mortgage loan was not a sale. If such party’s challenge were successful, payments on the certificates would be reduced or delayed. Even if the challenge were not successful, payments on the certificates would be delayed while a court resolves the claim.

— Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, a sponsor and an originator, is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Goldman Sachs Bank USA (“GS Bank”), a New York State chartered bank, the deposits of which are insured by the FDIC. If GS Bank were to become subject to receivership, the proceeding would be administered by the FDIC under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the “FDIA”); likewise, if GS Bank were to become subject to conservatorship, the agency appointed as conservator would likely be the FDIC as well. The FDIA gives the FDIC the power to disaffirm or repudiate contracts to which a bank is party at the time of receivership or conservatorship and the performance of which the FDIC determines to be burdensome, in which case the counterparty to the contract has a claim for payment by the receivership or conservatorship estate of “actual direct compensatory damages” as of the date of receivership or conservatorship. The FDIC has adopted a rule, substantially revised and effective January 1, 2011, establishing a safe harbor (the “FDIC Safe Harbor”) from its repudiation powers for securitizations meeting the requirements of the rule (12 C.F.R. § 360.6). The transfer of the applicable mortgage loans by Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company to the depositor will not qualify for the FDIC Safe Harbor. However, the transfer by Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company is not a transfer by a bank, and in any event, even if the FDIC Safe Harbor were applicable to such transfer, the FDIC Safe Harbor is non-exclusive. Notwithstanding the foregoing and that true sale opinions will be rendered on the Closing Date, the FDIC, a creditor, bankruptcy trustee or another interested party, including an entity transferring a mortgage loan, as debtor-in-possession, could still attempt to assert that the transfer of a mortgage loan by any of the sponsors was not a sale.

B-157

SUMMARY OF CERTAIN RISK FACTORS (continued)

■ Potential Conflicts of Interest of the Sponsors, Underwriters, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Operating Advisor, a Directing Holder, the Controlling Class Representative, any Companion Loan Holders and Mezzanine Lenders

— The sponsors, the underwriters, the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, a Directing Holder, the Controlling Class Representative, the holder of a companion loan (or its representative) or the holder of a mezzanine loan or any of their respective affiliates and/or sub-servicers, as applicable, may have interests when dealing with the mortgage loans that are in conflict with those of holders of the offered certificates, especially if the sponsors, the underwriters, the master servicer, the special servicer, the operating advisor, a Directing Holder, the Controlling Class Representative, the holder of a companion loan (or its representative) or the holder of a mezzanine loan or any of their respective affiliates and/or sub-servicers, as applicable, holds certificates, or has financial interests in or other financial dealings with a borrower or an affiliate of the borrower. Each of these relationships may create a conflict of interest and should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any offered certificates.

■ Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Selection of the Underlying Mortgage Loans

— The anticipated initial investor in certain of the subordinate certificates (the “B-Piece Buyer”) was given the opportunity by the sponsors to perform due diligence on the mortgage loans originally identified by the sponsors for inclusion in the issuing entity, and to request the removal, re-sizing or change in other features of some or all of the mortgage loans. The mortgage pool as originally proposed by the sponsors was adjusted based on some of these requests. In addition, the B-Piece Buyer received or may receive price adjustments or cost mitigation arrangements in connection with accepting certain mortgage loans in the mortgage pool. Actions of the B-Piece Buyer may be adverse to those of purchasers of the offered certificates.

■ Interests and Incentives of the Originators, the Sponsors and Their Affiliates May Not Be Aligned with Your Interests

— The originators, the sponsors and their affiliates (including certain of the underwriters) expect to derive ancillary benefits from this offering of offered certificates and their respective incentives may not be aligned with those of purchasers of the offered certificates. The sponsors originated or purchased the mortgage loans in order to securitize the mortgage loans by means of a transaction such as this offering of the offered certificates. The sponsors will sell the mortgage loans to the depositor (an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp., one of the sponsors, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., one of the underwriters) on the Closing Date in exchange for cash, derived from the sale of the offered certificates to investors, and/or in exchange for offered certificates. A completed offering would reduce the sponsors’ and/or their respective affiliates’ exposure to the mortgage loans. The offering of offered certificates will effectively transfer the sponsors’ and/or their respective affiliates’ exposure to the mortgage loans to purchasers of the offered certificates and the other certificates of the same series.

— The originators, the sponsors and their affiliates (including certain of the underwriters) expect to receive various benefits, including compensation, commissions, payments, rebates, remuneration and business opportunities in connection with or as a result of this offering of offered certificates and their interests in the mortgage loans.

— Each of the foregoing relationships should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any offered certificates.

■ Interests and Incentives of the Underwriter Entities May Not Be Aligned with Your Interests

— The activities and interests of the underwriters and their respective affiliates (collectively, the “Underwriter Entities”) will not align with, and may in fact be directly contrary to, those of the certificateholders. The Underwriter Entities are each part of separate global investment banking, securities and investment management firms that provide a wide range of financial services to a substantial and diversified client base that includes corporations, financial institutions, governments and high-net-worth individuals. As such, they actively make markets in and trade financial instruments for their own account and for the accounts of customers.

— The Underwriter Entities’ activities include, among other things, executing large block trades and taking long and short positions directly and indirectly, through derivative instruments or otherwise. The securities and instruments in which the Underwriter Entities take positions, or expect to take positions, include loans similar to the mortgage loans, securities and instruments similar to the offered certificates and other securities and instruments. Market making is an activity where the Underwriter Entities buy and sell on behalf of customers, or for their own account, to satisfy the expected demand of customers. By its nature, market making involves facilitating transactions among market participants that have differing views of securities and instruments. As a result, you should expect that the Underwriter Entities will take positions that are inconsistent with, or adverse to, the investment objectives of investors in the offered certificates.

— If an Underwriter Entity becomes a holder of any of the certificates, through market-making activity or otherwise, any actions that it takes in its capacity as a certificateholder, including voting, providing consents or otherwise will not necessarily be aligned with the interests of other holders of the same class or other classes of the certificates.

— In addition, the Underwriter Entities will have no obligation to monitor the performance of the certificates or the actions of the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator, the trustee or the operating advisor and will have no authority to advise the master servicer, the special servicer, the certificate administrator, the trustee or the operating advisor or to direct their actions.

— Each of the foregoing affiliations and relationships should be considered carefully by you before you invest in any offered certificates.

B-158

SUMMARY OF CERTAIN RISK FACTORS (continued)

■ Other Rating Agencies May Assign Different Ratings to the Certificates

— Other nationally recognized statistical rating organizations that the depositor did not engage to rate the offered certificates may nevertheless issue unsolicited credit ratings on one or more classes of offered certificates. If any such unsolicited ratings are issued, we cannot assure you that they will not be different from any ratings assigned by the rating agencies engaged by the depositor. The issuance of unsolicited ratings by any nationally recognized statistical rating organization on one or more classes of the offered certificates that are different from ratings assigned by a rating agency engaged by the depositor may adversely impact the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of that class.

■ Tax Considerations

— The offered certificates will represent ownership (directly or through a grantor trust) of one or more regular interests in one or more real estate mortgage investment conduits (each a “REMIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

— Special tax considerations may apply to certain types of investors. Prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors regarding tax implications of an investment in the offered certificates.

— State, local and other tax laws may differ substantially from the corresponding federal law. Prospective investors should consult with their own tax advisors with respect to the various state, local and other tax consequences of an investment in the offered certificates.

B-159

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

ANNEX C

MORTGAGE POOL INFORMATION

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

Distribution of Loan Purpose

Loan Purpose	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV
Refinance	45	$	604,426,194	63.1	%	$	13,431,693	1.67x	4.608%	119.7	65.0%	55.3%
Acquisition	18		351,832,479	36.7		$	19,546,249	1.66x	4.557%	117.5	69.4%	61.0%
Recapitalization	1		2,230,560	0.2		$	2,230,560	1.58x	4.880%	119.0	54.4%	44.6%
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg.	64	$	958,489,233	100.0	%	$	14,976,394	1.66x	4.590%	118.8	66.6%	57.4%

Distribution of Amortization Types⁽¹⁾

Amortization Type	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV
Amortizing (25 Years)	1	$	8,000,000	0.8	%	$	8,000,000	1.35x	4.850%	120.0	66.1%	49.2%
Amortizing (30 Years)	20		264,228,011	27.6		$	13,211,401	1.61x	4.758%	118.0	67.7%	54.9%
Interest Only, Then Amortizing(2)	38		557,961,222	58.2		$	14,683,190	1.58x	4.543%	119.3	65.7%	56.2%
Interest Only	5		128,300,000	13.4		$	25,660,000	2.15x	4.433%	118.7	68.3%	68.3%
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg.	64	$	958,489,233	100.0	%	$	14,976,394	1.66x	4.590%	118.8	66.6%	57.4%

(1) All of the mortgage loans will have balloon payments at maturity date.

(2) Original partial interest only months range from 12 to 69 months.

Distribution of Cut-off Date Balances

Range of Cut-off Balances ($)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV
1,600,000 - 4,999,999	13	$	44,378,463	4.6	%	$	3,413,728	1.45x	4.720%	119.0	65.2%	54.5%
5,000,000 - 9,999,999	26		193,304,571	20.2		$	7,434,791	1.69x	4.629%	114.4	64.2%	54.7%
10,000,000 - 14,999,999	11		125,821,000	13.1		$	11,438,273	1.50x	4.674%	119.3	69.8%	61.8%
15,000,000 - 19,999,999	3		50,982,942	5.3		$	16,994,314	1.43x	4.556%	119.4	71.8%	59.7%
20,000,000 - 29,999,999	3		75,046,472	7.8		$	25,015,491	1.35x	4.515%	119.4	73.0%	65.2%
30,000,000 - 34,999,999	1		31,230,786	3.3		$	31,230,786	1.63x	4.271%	119.0	66.3%	51.2%
35,000,000 - 39,999,999	2		72,125,000	7.5		$	36,062,500	1.67x	4.694%	118.0	73.2%	68.0%
40,000,000 - 100,000,000	5		365,600,000	38.1		$	73,120,000	1.83x	4.552%	121.0	63.7%	54.1%
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg.	64	$	958,489,233	100.0	%	$	14,976,394	1.66x	4.590%	118.8	66.6%	57.4%
	Min	$	1,600,000
	Max	$	100,000,000
	Average	$	14,976,394

C-1

Distribution of Underwritten Debt Service Coverage Ratios

Range of Underwritten Debt Service Coverage Ratios (x)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV
1.14 - 1.29	3	$	40,142,472	4.2	%	$	13,380,824	1.18x	4.697%	119.3	70.5%	62.8%
1.30 - 1.49	32		361,850,941	37.8		$	11,307,842	1.39x	4.616%	119.1	69.3%	57.5%
1.50 - 1.69	10		232,769,514	24.3		$	23,276,951	1.62x	4.704%	119.4	68.7%	57.3%
1.70 - 1.89	12		156,226,306	16.3		$	13,018,859	1.78x	4.670%	116.5	67.7%	60.9%
1.90 - 2.09	2		16,200,000	1.7		$	8,100,000	2.05x	4.529%	119.0	59.4%	53.1%
2.10 - 2.29	1		9,000,000	0.9		$	9,000,000	2.29x	4.550%	119.0	63.0%	48.7%
2.30 - 2.66	4		142,300,000	14.8		$	35,575,000	2.38x	4.228%	119.6	55.1%	52.9%
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg.	64	$	958,489,233	100.0	%	$	14,976,394	1.66x	4.590%	118.8	66.6%	57.4%
	Min		1.14
	Max		2.66
	Average		1.66

Distribution of Mortgage Interest Rates

Range of Mortgage Interest Rates (%)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV
4.110 - 4.249	3	$	80,483,168	8.4	%	$	26,827,723	2.17x	4.135%	126.3	47.1%	41.9%
4.250 - 4.499	16		317,974,920	33.2		$	19,873,433	1.71x	4.401%	117.6	66.9%	57.1%
4.500 - 4.749	27		304,006,487	31.7		$	11,259,500	1.57x	4.627%	117.6	69.0%	61.1%
4.750 - 4.999	14		230,861,635	24.1		$	16,490,117	1.58x	4.908%	119.5	69.9%	58.4%
5.000 - 5.249	3		20,863,023	2.2		$	6,954,341	1.32x	5.013%	119.3	68.4%	56.4%
5.250 - 5.360	1		4,300,000	0.4		$	4,300,000	1.48x	5.360%	119.0	61.4%	53.3%
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg.	64	$	958,489,233	100.0	%	$	14,976,394	1.66x	4.590%	118.8	66.6%	57.4%
	Min		4.110%
	Max		5.360%
	Average		4.590%

C-2

Distribution of Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratios⁽¹⁾

Range of Cut-off Date Loan-to-Value Ratios (%)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV
41.3 - 49.9	1	$	65,000,000	6.8	%	$	65,000,000	2.30x	4.110%	128.0	41.3%	37.5%
50.0 - 54.9	4		27,230,560	2.8		$	6,807,640	2.15x	4.453%	100.7	53.1%	47.9%
55.0 - 59.9	5		35,300,000	3.7		$	7,060,000	1.70x	4.509%	119.3	57.1%	52.2%
60.0 - 64.9	15		105,219,858	11.0		$	7,014,657	1.69x	4.658%	115.1	63.4%	52.6%
65.0 - 69.9	12		310,951,558	32.4		$	25,912,630	1.52x	4.657%	119.5	67.4%	53.8%
70.0 - 75.0	27		414,787,258	43.3		$	15,362,491	1.63x	4.614%	119.1	72.6%	65.4%
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg.	64	$	958,489,233	100.0	%	$	14,976,394	1.66x	4.590%	118.8	66.6%	57.4%

(1) Unless otherwise indicated, the Cut-off Date LTV Ratio is calculated utilizing the “as-is” appraised value. With respect to 7 mortgage loans, representing approximately 19.9% of the aggregate principal balance of the pool of mortgage loans as of the cut-off date, the respective Cut-off Date LTV Ratio was calculated using either (i) an “as-is” appraised value plus related capital improvement or property improvement plan costs which were reserved for at origination, (ii) the cut-off date principal balance of a mortgage loan less a reserve taken at origination or (iii) the “as stabilized” appraised value which assumes the completion of capital improvements which were reserved for at origination. The weighted average Cut-off Date LTV Ratio for the mortgage pool without making any of the adjustments described above is 67.1%.

Min	41.3%
Max	75.0%
Average	66.6%

Distribution of Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratios⁽¹⁾

Range of Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratios (%)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV
37.5 - 39.9	1	$	65,000,000	6.8	%	$	65,000,000	2.30x	4.110%	128.0	41.3%	37.5%
40.0 - 44.9	1		2,230,560	0.2		$	2,230,560	1.58x	4.880%	119.0	54.4%	44.6%
45.0 - 49.9	10		66,773,559	7.0		$	6,677,356	1.79x	4.551%	111.8	59.3%	47.7%
50.0 - 54.9	12		214,625,786	22.4		$	17,885,482	1.55x	4.532%	119.3	65.1%	51.6%
55.0 - 59.9	16		209,160,455	21.8		$	13,072,528	1.58x	4.784%	117.5	67.5%	56.4%
60.0 - 64.9	16		225,698,874	23.5		$	14,106,180	1.47x	4.677%	119.1	72.6%	63.0%
65.0 - 69.9	6		78,500,000	8.2		$	13,083,333	1.49x	4.612%	119.4	73.0%	67.6%
70.0 - 72.1	2		96,500,000	10.1		$	48,250,000	2.17x	4.419%	118.6	71.3%	71.3%
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg.	64	$	958,489,233	100.0	%	$	14,976,394	1.66x	4.590%	118.8	66.6%	57.4%

(1) Maturity Date Loan-to-Value Ratio is calculated on the basis of the “as stabilized” appraised value for 20 mortgage loans

Min	37.5%
Max	72.1%
Average	57.4%

C-3

Distribution of Original Terms to Maturity

Original Term to Maturity (Mos)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV
60	2	$	15,641,299	1.6	%	$	7,820,649	2.10x	4.403%	59.0	58.6%	51.6%
120	61		877,847,935	91.6		$	14,390,950	1.61x	4.629%	119.2	68.6%	59.0%
129	1		65,000,000	6.8		$	65,000,000	2.30x	4.110%	128.0	41.3%	37.5%
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg.	64	$	958,489,233	100.0	%	$	14,976,394	1.66x	4.590%	118.8	66.6%	57.4%
	Min		60	months
	Max		129	months
	Average		120	months

Distribution of Remaining Terms to Maturity

Range of Remaining Term to Maturity (Mos)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV
59	2	$	15,641,299	1.6	%	$	7,820,649	2.10x	4.403%	59.0	58.6%	51.6%
118 - 120	61		877,847,935	91.6		$	14,390,950	1.61x	4.629%	119.2	68.6%	59.0%
128	1		65,000,000	6.8		$	65,000,000	2.30x	4.110%	128.0	41.3%	37.5%
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg.	64	$	958,489,233	100.0	%	$	14,976,394	1.66x	4.590%	118.8	66.6%	57.4%
	Min		59	months
	Max		128	months
	Average		119	months

Distribution of Original Amortization Terms

Original Amortization Terms (Mos)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV
Interest Only	5	$	128,300,000	13.4	%	$	25,660,000	2.15x	4.433%	118.7	68.3%	68.3%
300	2		14,400,000	1.5		$	7,200,000	1.64x	4.761%	119.6	63.8%	47.4%
360	57		815,789,233	85.1		$	14,312,092	1.59x	4.612%	118.9	66.4%	55.8%
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg.	64	$	958,489,233	100.0	%	$	14,976,394	1.66x	4.590%	118.8	66.6%	57.4%
	Min		300	months
	Max		360	months
	Average		359	months

C-4

Distribution of Remaining Amortization Terms

Range of Remaining Amortization Terms (Mos)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV
Interest Only	5	$	128,300,000	13.4	%	$	25,660,000	2.15x	4.433%	118.7	68.3%	68.3%
300	2		14,400,000	1.5		$	7,200,000	1.64x	4.761%	119.6	63.8%	47.4%
358 - 360	57		815,789,233	85.1		$	14,312,092	1.59x	4.612%	118.9	66.4%	55.8%
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg.	64	$	958,489,233	100.0	%	$	14,976,394	1.66x	4.590%	118.8	66.6%	57.4%
	Min		300	months
	Max		360	months
	Average		359	months

Mortgage Loans with Original Partial Interest Only Period

Original Partial Interest Only Period (Mos)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV
12	3	$	18,725,000	2.0	%	$	6,241,667	2.00x	4.568%	92.4	57.5%	46.7%
24	12	$	119,343,750	12.5	%	$	9,945,313	1.60x	4.629%	118.9	69.4%	58.6%
36	10	$	114,196,472	11.9	%	$	11,419,647	1.35x	4.582%	119.1	69.4%	60.9%
48	2	$	15,700,000	1.6	%	$	7,850,000	1.37x	4.818%	118.7	72.5%	64.8%
60	10	$	224,996,000	23.5	%	$	22,499,600	1.46x	4.581%	119.3	69.2%	58.0%
69	1	$	65,000,000	6.8	%	$	65,000,000	2.30x	4.110%	128.0	41.3%	37.5%

Distribution of Prepayment Provisions

Prepayment Provision	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV
Defeasance	53	$	863,586,780	90.1	%	$	16,294,090	1.68x	4.601%	119.4	66.6%	57.5%
Yield Maintenance	9		63,419,512	6.6		$	7,046,612	1.57x	4.378%	111.5	64.0%	53.2%
Yield Maintenance or Defeasance	2		31,482,942	3.3		$	15,741,471	1.40x	4.703%	119.0	73.9%	62.6%
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg.	64	$	958,489,233	100.0	%	$	14,976,394	1.66x	4.590%	118.8	66.6%	57.4%

C-5

Distribution of Debt Yields on Underwritten Net Operating Income

Range of Debt Yields on Underwritten Net Operating Income (%)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV
7.1 - 7.9	2	$	29,796,472	3.1	%	$	14,898,236	1.14x	4.620%	119.0	70.6%	62.2%
8.0 - 8.9	10		133,634,023	13.9		$	13,363,402	1.50x	4.619%	118.9	70.3%	64.8%
9.0 - 9.9	24		285,103,337	29.7		$	11,879,306	1.41x	4.595%	119.1	68.7%	56.5%
10.0 - 10.9	10		133,079,095	13.9		$	13,307,910	1.55x	4.590%	118.9	68.6%	58.3%
11.0 - 11.9	4		77,652,507	8.1		$	19,413,127	2.25x	4.346%	119.0	71.0%	68.5%
12.0 - 12.9	5		164,203,799	17.1		$	32,840,760	1.72x	4.829%	117.2	68.1%	56.8%
13.0 - 13.9	6		111,320,000	11.6		$	18,553,333	2.18x	4.374%	124.6	50.0%	43.8%
14.0 - 14.9	1		6,400,000	0.7		$	6,400,000	2.00x	4.650%	119.0	61.0%	45.2%
15.0 - 15.9	2		17,300,000	1.8		$	8,650,000	2.31x	4.425%	90.2	58.3%	47.4%
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg.	64	$	958,489,233	100.0	%	$	14,976,394	1.66x	4.590%	118.8	66.6%	57.4%
	Min		7.1%
	Max		15.9%
	Average		10.6%

Distribution of Debt Yields on Underwritten Net Cash Flow

Range of Debt Yields on Underwritten Net Cash Flow (%)	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV
7.0 - 7.9	2	$	29,796,472	3.1	%	$	14,898,236	1.14x	4.620%	119.0	70.6%	62.2%
8.0 - 8.9	29		385,246,057	40.2		$	13,284,347	1.42x	4.600%	119.1	69.4%	59.2%
9.0 - 9.9	15		176,789,839	18.4		$	11,785,989	1.57x	4.569%	119.0	68.8%	58.8%
10.0 - 10.9	7		183,695,567	19.2		$	26,242,224	1.93x	4.701%	119.6	68.5%	60.1%
11.0 - 11.9	6		84,781,299	8.8		$	14,130,216	1.89x	4.693%	114.6	65.8%	57.3%
12.0 - 13.9	4		89,180,000	9.3		$	22,295,000	2.24x	4.255%	120.1	46.3%	40.5%
14.0	1		9,000,000	0.9		$	9,000,000	2.29x	4.550%	119.0	63.0%	48.7%
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg.	64	$	958,489,233	100.0	%	$	14,976,394	1.66x	4.590%	118.8	66.6%	57.4%
	Min		7.0%
	Max		14.0%
	Average		9.7%

C-6

Distribution of Lockbox Types
Lockbox Type	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance
Hard	17	$	525,281,740	54.8	%
Springing	41		399,182,115	41.6
None	6		34,025,378	3.5
Total/Avg./Wtd.Avg.	64	$	958,489,233	100.0	%

Distribution of Escrows
Escrow Type	Number of Mortgage Loans	Cut-off Date Balance		% of Initial Pool Balance
Real Estate Tax	60	$	918,213,336	95.8	%
Replacement Reserves(1)	59	$	886,682,549	92.5	%
TI/LC(2)	30	$	466,090,555	82.2	%
Insurance	47	$	436,940,867	45.6	%

(1) Includes mortgage loans with FF&E reserves.

(2) Percentage of total office, retail, mixed use and industrial properties and one self storage property with office tenants only.

C-7

Distribution of Property Types

Property Type / Detail	Number of Mortgaged Properties	Cut-off Date Balance(1)		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio(2)	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate(2)	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)(2)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV(2)	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV(2)
Office	8	$	254,412,500	26.5	%	$	31,801,563	1.91x	4.376%	74.5	61.0%	52.8%
CBD	3		165,000,000	17.2		$	55,000,000	1.72x	4.343%	50.4	56.7%	45.4%
General Suburban	4		85,112,500	8.9		$	21,278,125	2.28x	4.388%	119.0	69.2%	67.0%
Medical	1		4,300,000	0.4		$	4,300,000	1.48x	5.360%	119.0	61.4%	53.3%
Hospitality	19	$	218,211,299	22.8	%	$	11,484,805	1.79x	4.808%	48.0	66.3%	55.0%
Full Service	5		82,912,775	8.7		$	16,582,555	1.68x	4.954%	0.0	68.3%	55.5%
Select Service	4		63,920,000	6.7		$	15,980,000	1.80x	4.806%	120.0	68.1%	58.4%
Limited Service	6		50,393,344	5.3		$	8,398,891	1.88x	4.643%	46.9	61.6%	50.4%
Extended Stay	4		20,985,180	2.2		$	5,246,295	2.00x	4.632%	20.6	64.7%	53.5%
Retail	27	$	215,701,636	22.5	%	$	7,988,949	1.41x	4.614%	95.5	70.2%	60.2%
Anchored	10		128,182,942	13.4		$	12,818,294	1.47x	4.552%	119.4	70.4%	60.4%
Unanchored	7		37,519,920	3.9		$	5,359,989	1.41x	4.783%	90.8	71.6%	63.3%
Single Tenant Retail	7		37,079,640	3.9		$	5,297,091	1.22x	4.639%	9.7	70.4%	59.5%
Shadow Anchored	3		12,919,134	1.3		$	4,306,378	1.41x	4.676%	118.7	63.4%	50.9%
Multifamily	14	$	125,411,482	13.1	%	$	8,957,963	1.59x	4.592%	111.0	68.7%	63.8%
Garden	12		106,486,482	11.1		$	8,873,874	1.62x	4.598%	118.8	68.7%	64.4%
Mid-Rise	1		10,600,000	1.1		$	10,600,000	1.49x	4.297%	120.0	63.3%	55.1%
Student Housing	1		8,325,000	0.9		$	8,325,000	1.35x	4.900%	0.0	75.0%	67.7%
Self Storage	18	$	59,750,884	6.2	%	$	3,319,494	1.39x	4.597%	28.9	70.7%	61.8%
Mixed Use	4	$	46,180,175	4.8	%	$	11,545,044	1.52x	4.420%	106.4	66.2%	53.3%
Office/Retail/Self Storage	1		31,230,786	3.3		$	31,230,786	1.63x	4.271%	119.0	66.3%	51.2%
Flex	1		6,292,749	0.7		$	6,292,749	1.37x	4.655%	119.0	69.2%	56.3%
Office/Retail	1		4,906,640	0.5		$	4,906,640	1.28x	4.920%	0.0	70.1%	64.6%
Retail/Multifamily	1		3,750,000	0.4		$	3,750,000	1.15x	4.620%	119.0	55.1%	50.6%
Industrial	2	$	38,821,257	4.1	%	$	19,410,629	1.59x	4.820%	118.1	73.2%	62.6%
Flex	2		38,821,257	4.1		$	19,410,629	1.59x	4.820%	118.1	73.2%	62.6%
Total / Wtd Avg	92	$	958,489,233	100.0	%	$	10,418,361	1.66x	4.590%	78.4	66.6%	57.4%

(1) Calculated based on the mortgaged property’s allocated loan amount for the mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property.

(2) Weighted average based on the mortgaged property’s allocated loan amount for mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property.

C-8

Geographic Distribution

Property Location	Number of Mortgaged Properties	Cut-off Date Balance(1)		% of Initial Pool Balance		Average Cut-off Date Balance		Weighted Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio(2)	Weighted Average Mortgage Interest Rate(2)	Weighted Average Remaining Terms to Maturity (Mos)(2)	Weighted Average Cut-off Date LTV(2)	Weighted Average Maturity Date LTV(2)
Illinois	14	$	160,703,794	16.8	%	$	11,478,842	1.39x	4.530%	24.8	69.3%	56.4%
California	7		133,805,560	14.0		$	19,115,080	2.00x	4.542%	119.4	67.6%	62.8%
New York	4		77,320,018	8.1		$	19,330,004	2.15x	4.190%	126.6	44.9%	39.8%
Texas	12		76,079,346	7.9		$	6,339,945	1.54x	4.655%	58.4	68.1%	55.8%
North Carolina	4		73,390,541	7.7		$	18,347,635	1.63x	4.829%	72.1	70.1%	59.6%
Florida	8		62,190,566	6.5		$	7,773,821	1.72x	4.745%	113.9	66.6%	58.4%
Michigan	4		57,500,000	6.0		$	14,375,000	1.63x	4.535%	74.9	71.9%	68.8%
Pennsylvania	2		42,480,786	4.4		$	21,240,393	1.58x	4.344%	119.0	68.6%	55.8%
Virginia	5		37,229,640	3.9		$	7,445,928	1.21x	4.605%	36.0	71.9%	62.7%
Ohio	5		25,800,967	2.7		$	5,160,193	1.57x	4.449%	119.3	67.8%	56.2%
Georgia	3		23,788,023	2.5		$	7,929,341	1.47x	4.995%	119.5	67.8%	55.7%
Oregon	2		22,800,000	2.4		$	11,400,000	1.86x	4.552%	119.0	62.1%	62.1%
Oklahoma	2		21,074,641	2.2		$	10,537,321	1.61x	4.830%	30.5	67.1%	55.5%
Tennessee	1		20,235,247	2.1		$	20,235,247	1.68x	4.954%	0.0	68.3%	55.5%
Missouri	2		20,126,823	2.1		$	10,063,412	1.45x	4.874%	91.5	73.5%	60.0%
Nevada	2		16,725,000	1.7		$	8,362,500	1.60x	4.356%	119.3	74.0%	64.1%
Indiana	3		13,906,640	1.5		$	4,635,547	1.93x	4.681%	0.0	65.5%	54.3%
New Jersey	2		13,600,000	1.4		$	6,800,000	1.44x	4.507%	118.5	61.0%	53.2%
Arizona	1		11,974,976	1.2		$	11,974,976	1.68x	4.954%	0.0	68.3%	55.5%
Alabama	1		10,103,668	1.1		$	10,103,668	1.68x	4.954%	0.0	68.3%	55.5%
Wisconsin	3		9,292,749	1.0		$	3,097,583	1.38x	4.624%	80.6	70.4%	58.7%
Kentucky	1		8,300,000	0.9		$	8,300,000	2.33x	4.290%	59.0	53.2%	46.0%
Arkansas	1		6,890,000	0.7		$	6,890,000	1.83x	4.950%	120.0	66.9%	54.9%
South Carolina	1		5,600,000	0.6		$	5,600,000	1.47x	4.429%	118.0	74.9%	63.8%
Colorado	1		4,000,000	0.4		$	4,000,000	1.44x	4.580%	118.0	65.3%	56.2%
Mississippi	1		3,570,248	0.4		$	3,570,248	1.35x	4.850%	0.0	66.1%	49.2%
Total	92	$	958,489,233	100.0	%	$	10,418,361	1.66x	4.590%	78.4	66.6%	57.4%

(1) Calculated based on the mortgaged property’s allocated loan amount for the mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property.

(2) Weighted average based on the mortgaged property’s allocated loan amount for mortgage loans secured by more than one mortgaged property.

C-9

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

ANNEX D

FORM OF DISTRIBUTION DATE STATEMENT

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

Distribution Date:
Determination Date: Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2015-GC33

CONTACT INFORMATION			CONTENTS
	Depositor	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.	Distribution Summary	2
			Distribution Summary (Factors)	3
			Interest Distribution Detail	4
	Master Servicer	Wells Fargo Bank, National Association	Principal Distribution Detail	5
			Reconciliation Detail	6
			Stratification Detail	7
	Operating Advisor	Situs Holdings, LLC
			Mortgage Loan Detail	11
			NOI Detail	12
			Delinquency Loan Detail	13
	Trustee / Custodian	Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
			Appraisal Reduction Detail	15
			Loan Modification Detail	17
			Specially Serviced Loan Detail	19
	Special Servicer	LNR Partners, LLC
			Unscheduled Principal Detail	21
			Liquidated Loan Detail	23

Deal Contact:	John Hannon	Citibank, N.A.
	john.hannon@citi.com	Agency and Trust
	Tel: (212) 816-5693	388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor
	Fax: (212) 816-5527	New York, NY 10013

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-1 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:
Determination Date: Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2015-GC33

Distribution Summary

DISTRIBUTION IN DOLLARS

Prior

Pass-

Accrual

Yield

Prepayment

Current

Original

Principal

Through

Day Count

Accrual

Interest

Principal

Maintenance

Penalties

Total

Deferred

Realized

Principal

Class

Balance

Balance

Rate

Fraction

Dates

Distributed

Distributed

Distributed

Distributed

Distributed

Interest

Loss

Balance

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

(10)

(11)=(7+8+9+10)

(12)

(13)

(14)=(3-8+12-13)

Totals

Notional Classes

Totals

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-2 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:
Determination Date: Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2015-GC33

PER $1,000 OF ORIGINAL BALANCE
Class	CUSIP	Record Date	Prior Principal Balance (3/2 x 1000)	Interest Distributed (7/2 x 1000)	Principal Distributed (8/2 x 1000)	Yield Maintenance Distributed (9)/(2) x 1000	Prepayment Penalties Distributed (10)/(2) x 1000	Total Distributed (11/2 x 1000)	Deferred Interest (12/2 x 1000)	Realized Loss (13/2 x 1000)	Current Principal Balance (142 x 1000)

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-3 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:
Determination Date: Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2015-GC33

Interest Distribution Detail

DISTRIBUTION IN DOLLARS

Prior

Pass-

Next Pass-

Accrual

Optimal

Prior

Interest on

Non-Recov.

Current

Principal

Through

Through

Day Count

Accrued

Unpaid

Prior Unpaid

Interest

Interest

Deferred

Interest

Unpaid

Class

Balance

Rate

Rate

Fraction

Interest

Interest

Interest

Shortfall

Due

Interest

Distributed

Interest

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

(10)=(6)+(7)+(8)-(9)

(11)

(12)

(13)=(10)-(11)-(12)

Totals

Notional Classes

Totals

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-4 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:
Determination Date: Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2015-GC33

Principal Distribution Detail

DISTRIBUTION IN DOLLARS

Prior

Scheduled

Unscheduled

Current

Current

Current

Cumulative

Original

Current

Original

Current

Original

Principal

Principal

Principal

Accreted

Realized

Principal

Principal

Realized

Class

Class

Credit

Credit

Class

Balance

Balance

Distribution

Distribution

Principal

Loss

Recoveries

Balance

Loss

(%)

(%)

Support

Support

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)=(3)-(4)-(5)+(6)-(7)+(8)

(10)

(11)

(12)

(13)

(14)

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-5 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:
Determination Date: Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2015-GC33

Reconciliation Detail

SOURCE OF FUNDS		ALLOCATION OF FUNDS
	Interest Funds Available		Scheduled Fees
	Scheduled Interest		Sub-Servicing Fee
	Prepayment Interest Shortfall		Master Servicing Fee
	Interest Adjustments		Trustee Fee
	Realized Loss in Excess of Principal Balance		Operating Advisor Fee
	Total Interest Funds Available:		Total Scheduled Fees:
			Additional Fees, Expenses, etc.
	Principal Funds Available		Special Servicing Fee
	Scheduled Principal		Workout Fee
	Curtailments		Liquidation Fee
	Principal Prepayments		Additional Trust Fund Expenses
	Net Liquidation Proceeds		Reimbursement for Interest on Advances
	Repurchased Principal		Other Expenses
	Substitution Principal		Total Additional Fees, Expenses, etc.:
	Other Principal		Distribution to Certificateholders
	Total Principal Funds Available:		Interest Distribution
	Other Funds Available		Principal Distribution
	Yield Maintenance Charges		Yield Maintenance Charges Distribution
	Prepayment Premiums		Prepayment Premiums Distribution
	Other Charges		Total Distribution to Certificateholders:
	Total Other Funds Available:		Total Funds Allocated
	Total Funds Available

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-6 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
	Series 2015-GC33
	Stratification Detail

Ending Scheduled Balance

State

Ending Scheduled Balance

# of Loans

Ending Scheduled Balance

% of Agg. End. Sched. Bal.

WAC

WART

WA DSCR

State

# of Properties

Ending Scheduled Balance

% of Agg. End. Sched. Bal.

WAC

WART

WA DSCR

Totals

Totals

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-7 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
	Series 2015-GC33
	Stratification Detail

Seasoning

Property Type

Seasoning

# of Loans

Ending Scheduled Balance

% of Agg. End. Sched. Bal.

WAC

WART

WA DSCR

Property Type

# of Properties

Ending Scheduled Balance

% of Agg. End. Sched. Bal.

WAC

WART

WA DSCR

Totals

Totals

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-8 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
	Series 2015-GC33
	Stratification Detail

Debt Service Coverage Ratio

Loan Rate

Debt Service Coverage Ratio

# of Loans

Ending Scheduled Balance

% of Agg. End. Sched. Bal.

WAC

WART

WA DSCR

Loan Rate

# of Loans

Ending Scheduled Balance

% of Agg. End. Sched. Bal.

WAC

WART

WA DSCR

Totals

Totals

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-9 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
	Series 2015-GC33
	Stratification Detail

Anticipated Remaining Term

Remaining Amortization Term

Anticipated Remaining Term

# of Loans

Ending Scheduled Balance

% of Agg. End. Sched. Bal.

WAC

WART

WA DSCR

Remaining Amortization Term

# of Loans

Ending Scheduled Balance

% of Agg. End. Sched. Bal.

WAC

WART

WA DSCR

Totals

Totals

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-10 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
	Series 2015-GC33

Mortgage Loan Detail

Loan

OMCR

Property Type

City

State

Interest Payment

Principal Payment

Gross Coupon

Maturity Date

Neg Am Flag

Beginning Scheduled Balance

Ending Scheduled Balance

Paid Through Date

Apprasial Reduction Date

Apprasial Reduction Amount

Payment Status of Loan (1)

Workout Strategy (2)

Mod. Code (3)

Totals

Payment Status of Loan (1)		Workout Strategy (2)			Mod. Code (3)
A. In Grace Period	3. 90+ Days Delinquent	1. Modification	7. REO	13. Other or TBD	1. Maturity Date Extension	7. Capitalization of Taxes
B. Late, but less than 30 Days	4. Performing Matured Balloon	2. Foreclosure	8. Resolved	98. Not Provided By Servicer	2. Amortization Change	8. Other
0. Current	5. Non Performing Matured Balloon	3. Bankruptcy	9. Pending Return to Master Servicer		3. Principal Write-Off	9. Combination
1. 30-59 Days Delinquent	7. Foreclosure	4. Extension	10. Deed In Lieu of Foreclosure		4. Blank (formerly Combination)
2. 60-89 Days Delinquent	9. REO	5. Note Sale	11. Full Payoff		5. Temporary Rate Reduction
		6. DPO	12. Reps and Warranties		6. Capitalization of Interest

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-11 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
	Series 2015-GC33

NOI Detail

Loan Number	OMCR	Property Type	City	State	Ending Scheduled Balance	Most Recent Fiscal NOI	Most Recent NOI	Most Recent NOI Start Date	Most Recent NOI End Date
Totals

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-12 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
	Series 2015-GC33
	Delinquency Loan Detail

Actual

Paid

Current P & I

Total P & I

Cumulative

Other Expense

Payment

Workout

Most Recent

Loan

# of Months

Principal

Through

Advances (Net

Advances

Accrued Unpaid

Advance

Status of

Strategy

Special Serv

Foreclosure

Bankruptcy

REO

Number

OMCR

Delinq

Balance

Date

of ASER)

Outstanding

Advance Interest

Outstanding

Loan (1)

(2)

Transfer Date

Date

Date

Date

There is no Delinquency Loan Detail for the current distribution period.

Totals

Payment Status of Loan (1)		Workout Strategy (2)
A. In Grace Period	3. 90+ Days Delinquent	1. Modification	7. REO	13. Other or TBD
B. Late, but less than 30 Days	4. Performing Matured Balloon	2. Foreclosure	8. Resolved	98. Not Provided By Servicer
0. Current	5. Non Performing Matured Balloon	3. Bankruptcy	9. Pending Return to Master Servicer
1. 30-59 Days Delinquent	7. Foreclosure	4. Extension	10. Deed In Lieu of Foreclosure
2. 60-89 Days Delinquent	9. REO	5. Note Sale	11. Full Payoff
		6. DPO	12. Reps and Warranties

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-13 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
	Series 2015-GC33
	Historical Delinquency Information

Distribution	Less Than 1 Month		1 Month		2 Month		3+ Month		Bankruptcy		Foreclosure		REO
Date
	End. Sched. Bal.	#	End. Sched. Bal.	#	End. Sched. Bal.	#	End. Sched. Bal.	#	End. Sched. Bal.	#	End. Sched. Bal.	#	End. Sched. Bal.	#
	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0
	0.000%	0.0%	0.000%	0.0%	0.000%	0.0%	0.000%	0.0%	0.000%	0.0%	0.000%	0.0%	0.000%	0.0%

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-14 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
	Series 2015-GC33
	Appraisal Reduction Detail

			Appraisal	Appraisal	Most Recent	Cumulative
Loan Number	OMCR	Property Name	Reduction Amount	Reduction Date	ASER Amount	ASER Amount
There is no Appraisal Reduction activity for the current distribution period.
Totals

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-15 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
	Series 2015-GC33
	Historical Appraisal Reduction Detail

Distribution				Appraisal	Appraisal	Most Recent	Cumulative
Date	Loan Number	OMCR	Property Name	Reduction Amount	Reduction Date	ASER Amount	ASER Amount
				There is no historical Appraisal Reduction activity.
Totals

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-16 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
	Series 2015-GC33
	Loan Modification Detail

			Modification	Modification	Modification
Loan Number	OMCR	Property Name	Date	Code (1)	Description
There is no Loan Modification activity for the current distribution period.
Totals

Modification Code (1)
1. Maturity Date Extension	7. Capitalization of Taxes
2. Amortization Change	8. Other
3. Principal Write-Off	9. Combination
4. Blank (formerly Combination)
5. Temporary Rate Reduction
6. Capitalization of Interest

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-17 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
	Series 2015-GC33
	Historical Loan Modification Detail

Distribution				Modification	Modification	Modification
Date	Loan	OMCR	Property Name	Date	Code (1)	Description
There is no historical Loan Modification activity.
Totals

Modification Code (1)
1. Maturity Date Extension	7. Capitalization of Taxes
2. Amortization Change	8. Other
3. Principal Write-Off	9. Combination
4. Blank (formerly Combination)
5. Temporary Rate Reduction
6. Capitalization of Interest

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-18 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-GC33 Specially Serviced Loan Detail

Loan	OMCR	Workout Strategy (1)	Most Recent Inspection Date	Most Recent Specially Serviced Transfer Date	Most Recent Appraisal Date	Most Recent Appraisal Value	Other REO Property Value	Comment from Special Servicer
There is no Specially Serviced Loan activity for the current distribution period.
Totals

Workout Strategy (1)
1. Modification	7. REO	13. Other or TBD
2. Foreclosure	8. Resolved	98. Not Provided By Servicer
3. Bankruptcy	9. Pending Return to Master Servicer
4. Extension	10. Deed In Lieu of Foreclosure
5. Note Sale	11. Full Payoff
6. DPO	12. Reps and Warranties

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-19 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-GC33 Historical Specially Serviced Loan Detail

Distribution Date

Loan Number

OMCR

Spec. Serviced Transfer Date

Workout Strategy (1)

Spec. Serviced Loan to MS

Scheduled Balance

Actual Balance

Property Type (2)

State

Interest Rate

Note Date

Net Operating Income

Net Operating Income Date

DSC Ratio

DSC Date

Maturity Date

WART

There is no historical Specially Serviced Loan activity.

Totals

Workout Strategy (1)
1. Modification	7. REO	13. Other or TBD
2. Foreclosure	8. Resolved	98. Not Provided By Servicer
3. Bankruptcy	9. Pending Return to Master Servicer
4. Extension	10. Deed In Lieu of Foreclosure
5. Note Sale	11. Full Payoff
6. DPO	12. Reps and Warranties

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-20 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-GC33 Unscheduled Principal Detail

Loan Number	OMCR	Liquidation / Prepayment Date	Liquidation / Prepayment Code	Unscheduled Principal Collections	Unscheduled Principal Adjustments	Other Interest Adjustment	Prepayment Interest Excess (Shortfall)	Prepayment Penalties	Yield Maintenance Charges
Totals

Liquidation / Prepayment Code (1)
1. Partial Liquidation (Curtailment)	7. Not Used
2. Payoff Prior To Maturity	8. Payoff With Penalty
3. Disposition / Liquidation	9. Payoff With Yield Maintenance
4. Repurchase / Substitution	10. Curtailment With Penalty
5. Full Payoff At Maturity	11. Curtailment With Yield
6. DPO	Maintenance

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-21 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-GC33 Historical Unscheduled Principal Detail

Distribution Date	Loan Number       OMCR	Liquidation / Prepayment Date	Liquidation / Prepayment Code	Unscheduled Principal Collections	Unscheduled Principal Adjustments	Other Interest Adjustment	Prepayment Interest Excess (Shortfall)	Prepayment Penality	Yield Maintenance Premium
Totals

Liquidation / Prepayment Code (1)
1. Partial Liquidation (Curtailment)	7. Not Used
2. Payoff Prior To Maturity	8. Payoff With Penalty
3. Disposition / Liquidation	9. Payoff With Yield Maintenance
4. Repurchase / Substitution	10. Curtailment With Penalty
5. Full Payoff At Maturity	11. Curtailment With Yield
6. DPO	Maintenance

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-22 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-GC33 Liquidated Loan Detail

Loan Number

OMCR

Final Recovery Determ Date

Most Recent Appraisal Date

Most Recent Appraisal Value

Actual Balance

Gross Proceeds

Proceeds as a % of Act Bal

Liquidation Expenses

Net Liquidation Proceeds

Net Proceeds as a % of Act Bal

Realized Loss

Repurchased by Seller (Y/N)

There is no Liquidated Loan activity for the current distribution period.

Totals

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-23 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

Distribution Date:	Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33
Determination Date:	Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2015-GC33 Historical Liquidated Loan Detail

Distribution Date

Loan Number

OMCR

Final Recovery Determ Date

Most Recent Appraisal Date

Most Recent Appraisal Value

Actual Balance

Gross Proceeds

Gross Proceeds as a % of Act Bal

Liquidation Expenses

Net Liquidation Proceeds

Net Proceeds as a % of Act Bal

Realized Loss

Repurchased by Seller (Y/N)

There is no historical Liquidated Loan activity.

Totals

Reports Available at www.sf.citidirect.com D-24 © Copyright 2015 Citigroup

ANNEX E-1

SPONSOR REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

Each Sponsor will make, as of the Cut-off Date or such other date as set forth below, with respect to each Mortgage Loan sold by it that we include in the Issuing Entity, representations and warranties generally to the effect set forth below. The exceptions to the representations and warranties set forth below are identified on Annex E-2 to this prospectus supplement. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Annex E-1 will have the meanings set forth in this prospectus supplement or, if not defined in this prospectus supplement, in the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement.

Each Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, together with the related representations and warranties, serves to contractually allocate risk between the related Sponsor, on the one hand, and the Issuing Entity, on the other. We present the related representations and warranties set forth below for the sole purpose of describing some of the terms and conditions of that risk allocation. The presentation of representations and warranties below is not intended as statements regarding the actual characteristics of the Mortgage Loans, the Mortgaged Properties or other matters. We cannot assure you that the Mortgage Loans actually conform to the statements made in the representations and warranties that we present below.

(1) Whole Loan; Ownership of Mortgage Loans. Except with respect to a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Loan Combination, each Mortgage Loan is a whole loan and not a participation interest in a Mortgage Loan. Each Mortgage Loan that is part of a Loan Combination is a senior or pari passu portion of a whole loan evidenced by a senior or pari passu note. At the time of the sale, transfer and assignment to Depositor, no Mortgage Note or Mortgage was subject to any assignment (other than assignments to the Sponsor), participation or pledge, and the Sponsor had good title to, and was the sole owner of, each Mortgage Loan free and clear of any and all liens, charges, pledges, encumbrances, participations, any other ownership interests on, in or to such Mortgage Loan other than any servicing rights appointment or similar agreement, any Outside Servicing Agreement with respect to an Outside Serviced Mortgage Loan and rights of the holder of a related Companion Loan pursuant to a Co-Lender Agreement. The Sponsor has full right and authority to sell, assign and transfer each Mortgage Loan, and the assignment to Depositor constitutes a legal, valid and binding assignment of such Mortgage Loan free and clear of any and all liens, pledges, charges or security interests of any nature encumbering such Mortgage Loan other than the rights of the holder of a related Companion Loan pursuant to a Co-Lender Agreement.

(2) Loan Document Status. Each related Mortgage Note, Mortgage, Assignment of Leases (if a separate instrument), guaranty and other agreement executed by or on behalf of the related Mortgagor, guarantor or other obligor in connection with such Mortgage Loan is the legal, valid and binding obligation of the related Mortgagor, guarantor or other obligor (subject to any non-recourse provisions contained in any of the foregoing agreements and any applicable state anti-deficiency or market value limit deficiency legislation), as applicable, and is enforceable in accordance with its terms, except (i) as such enforcement may be limited by (a) bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally and (b) general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforcement is considered in a proceeding in equity or at law) and (ii) that certain provisions in such Loan Documents (including, without limitation, provisions requiring the payment of default interest, late fees or prepayment/yield maintenance fees, charges and/or premiums) are, or may be, further limited or rendered unenforceable by or under applicable law, but (subject to the limitations set forth in clause (i) above) such limitations or unenforceability will not render such Loan Documents invalid as a whole or materially interfere with the Mortgagee’s realization of the principal benefits and/or security provided thereby (clauses (i) and (ii) collectively, the “Standard Qualifications”).

Except as set forth in the immediately preceding sentence, there is no valid offset, defense, counterclaim or right of rescission available to the related Mortgagor with respect to any of the related Mortgage Notes, Mortgages or other Loan Documents, including, without limitation, any such valid offset, defense, counterclaim or right based on intentional fraud by the Sponsor in connection with the origination of the Mortgage Loan, that would deny the Mortgagee the principal benefits intended to be provided by the Mortgage Note, Mortgage or other Loan Documents.

E-1-1

(3) Mortgage Provisions. The Loan Documents for each Mortgage Loan contain provisions that render the rights and remedies of the holder thereof adequate for the practical realization against the Mortgaged Property of the principal benefits of the security intended to be provided thereby, including realization by judicial or, if applicable, nonjudicial foreclosure subject to the limitations set forth in the Standard Qualifications.

(4) Mortgage Status; Waivers and Modifications. Since origination and except by written instruments set forth in the related Mortgage File (a) the material terms of such Mortgage, Mortgage Note, Mortgage Loan guaranty, and related Loan Documents have not been waived, impaired, modified, altered, satisfied, canceled, subordinated or rescinded in any respect which materially interferes with the security intended to be provided by such Mortgage; (b) no related Mortgaged Property or any portion thereof has been released from the lien of the related Mortgage in any manner which materially interferes with the security intended to be provided by such Mortgage or the use or operation of the remaining portion of such Mortgaged Property; and (c) neither the related Mortgagor nor the related guarantor has been released from its material obligations under the Mortgage Loan.

(5) Lien; Valid Assignment. Subject to the Standard Qualifications, each assignment of Mortgage and assignment of Assignment of Leases to the Issuing Entity constitutes a legal, valid and binding assignment to the Issuing Entity. Each related Mortgage and Assignment of Leases is freely assignable without the consent of the related Mortgagor. Each related Mortgage is a legal, valid and enforceable first lien on the related Mortgagor’s fee (or if identified on the loan schedule attached as an exhibit to the applicable Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, leasehold) interest in the Mortgaged Property in the principal amount of such Mortgage Loan or allocated loan amount (subject only to Permitted Encumbrances (as defined below) and the exceptions to paragraph (6) set forth on Annex E-2 (each such exception, a “Title Exception”)), except as the enforcement thereof may be limited by the Standard Qualifications. Such Mortgaged Property (subject to and excepting Permitted Encumbrances and the Title Exceptions) as of origination was, and as of the Cut-off Date, to the Sponsor’s knowledge, is free and clear of any recorded mechanics’ liens, recorded materialmen’s liens and other recorded encumbrances which are prior to or equal with the lien of the related Mortgage, except those which are bonded over, escrowed for or insured against by a lender’s title insurance policy (as described below), and, to the Sponsor’s knowledge and subject to the rights of tenants (as tenants only) (subject to and excepting Permitted Encumbrances and the Title Exceptions), no rights exist which under law could give rise to any such lien or encumbrance that would be prior to or equal with the lien of the related Mortgage, except those which are bonded over, escrowed for or insured against by a lender’s title insurance policy (as described below). Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no representation is made as to the perfection of any security interest in rents or other personal property to the extent that possession or control of such items or actions other than the filing of Uniform Commercial Code financing statements is required in order to effect such perfection.

(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance. Each Mortgaged Property securing a Mortgage Loan is covered by an American Land Title Association loan title insurance policy or a comparable form of loan title insurance policy approved for use in the applicable jurisdiction (or, if such policy is yet to be issued, by a pro forma policy, a preliminary title policy with escrow instructions or a “marked up” commitment, in each case binding on the title insurer) (the “Title Policy”) in the original principal amount of such Mortgage Loan (or with respect to a Mortgage Loan secured by multiple properties, an amount equal to at least the allocated loan amount with respect to the Title Policy for each such property) after all advances of principal (including any advances held in escrow or reserves), that insures for the benefit of the owner of the indebtedness secured by the Mortgage, the first priority lien of the Mortgage, which lien is subject only to (a) the lien of current real property taxes, water charges, sewer rents and assessments due and payable but not yet delinquent; (b) covenants, conditions and restrictions, rights of way, easements and other matters of public record; (c) the exceptions (general and specific) and exclusions set forth in such Title Policy; (d) other matters to which like properties are commonly subject; (e) the rights of tenants (as tenants only) under leases (including subleases) pertaining to the related Mortgaged Property and condominium declarations; (f) if the related Mortgage Loan constitutes a Cross-Collateralized Mortgage Loan, the lien of the Mortgage for another Mortgage Loan contained in the same Cross-Collateralized Group; and (g) if the related Mortgage Loan is part of a Loan Combination, the rights of the holder(s) of the related Companion Loan(s) pursuant to the related Co-Lender Agreement; provided that none of items (a) through (g), individually or in the aggregate, materially and adversely interferes with the value or

E-1-2

current use of the Mortgaged Property or the security intended to be provided by such Mortgage or the Mortgagor’s ability to pay its obligations when they become due (collectively, the “Permitted Encumbrances”). Except as contemplated by clauses (f) and (g) of the preceding sentence, none of the Permitted Encumbrances are mortgage liens that are senior to or coordinate and co-equal with the lien of the related Mortgage. Such Title Policy (or, if it has yet to be issued, the coverage to be provided thereby) is in full force and effect, all premiums thereon have been paid and no claims have been made by the Sponsor thereunder and no claims have been paid thereunder. Neither the Sponsor, nor to the Sponsor’s knowledge, any other holder of the Mortgage Loan, has done, by act or omission, anything that would materially impair the coverage under such Title Policy.

(7) Junior Liens. It being understood that B notes secured by the same Mortgage as a Mortgage Loan are not subordinate mortgages or junior liens, except for any Mortgage Loan that is cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with another Mortgage Loan, there are no subordinate mortgages or junior liens securing the payment of money encumbering the related Mortgaged Property (other than Permitted Encumbrances and the Title Exceptions, taxes and assessments, mechanics’ and materialmen’s liens (which are the subject of the representation in paragraph (5) above), and equipment and other personal property financing). Except as set forth on an exhibit to the applicable Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, the Sponsor has no knowledge of any mezzanine debt secured directly by interests in the related Mortgagor.

(8) Assignment of Leases and Rents. There exists as part of the related Mortgage File an Assignment of Leases (either as a separate instrument or incorporated into the related Mortgage). Subject to the Permitted Encumbrances and the Title Exceptions, each related Assignment of Leases creates a valid first-priority collateral assignment of, or a valid first-priority lien or security interest in, rents and certain rights under the related lease or leases, subject only to a license granted to the related Mortgagor to exercise certain rights and to perform certain obligations of the lessor under such lease or leases, including the right to operate the related leased property, except as the enforcement thereof may be limited by the Standard Qualifications. The related Mortgage or related Assignment of Leases, subject to applicable law, provides that, upon an event of default under the Mortgage Loan, a receiver is permitted to be appointed for the collection of rents or for the related Mortgagee to enter into possession to collect the rents or for rents to be paid directly to the Mortgagee.

(9) UCC Filings. If the related Mortgaged Property is operated as a hospitality property, the Sponsor has filed and/or recorded or caused to be filed and/or recorded (or, if not filed and/or recorded, submitted in proper form for filing and/or recording), UCC financing statements in the appropriate public filing and/or recording offices necessary at the time of the origination of the Mortgage Loan to perfect a valid security interest in all items of physical personal property reasonably necessary to operate such Mortgaged Property owned by such Mortgagor and located on the related Mortgaged Property (other than any non-material personal property, any personal property subject to a purchase money security interest, a sale and leaseback financing arrangement as permitted under the terms of the related Mortgage Loan documents or any other personal property leases applicable to such personal property), to the extent perfection may be effected pursuant to applicable law by recording or filing, as the case may be. Subject to the Standard Qualifications, each related Mortgage (or equivalent document) creates a valid and enforceable lien and security interest on the items of personalty described above. No representation is made as to the perfection of any security interest in rents or other personal property to the extent that possession or control of such items or actions other than the filing of UCC financing statements are required in order to effect such perfection.

(10) Condition of Property. The Sponsor or the originator of the Mortgage Loan inspected or caused to be inspected each related Mortgaged Property within six months of origination of the Mortgage Loan and within thirteen months of the Cut-off Date.

An engineering report or property condition assessment was prepared in connection with the origination of each Mortgage Loan no more than 13 months prior to the Cut-off Date. To the Sponsor’s knowledge, based solely upon due diligence customarily performed in connection with the origination of comparable mortgage loans, as of the Closing Date, each related Mortgaged Property was free and clear of any material damage (other than deferred maintenance for which escrows were established at origination) that would affect materially and adversely the use or value of such Mortgaged Property as security for the Mortgage Loan.

E-1-3

(11) Taxes and Assessments. All taxes, governmental assessments and other outstanding governmental charges (including, without limitation, water and sewage charges), or installments thereof, which could be a lien on the related Mortgaged Property that would be of equal or superior priority to the lien of the Mortgage and that prior to the Cut-off Date have become delinquent in respect of each related Mortgaged Property have been paid, or an escrow of funds has been established in an amount sufficient to cover such payments and reasonably estimated interest and penalties, if any, thereon. For purposes of this representation and warranty, real estate taxes and governmental assessments and other outstanding governmental charges and installments thereof shall not be considered delinquent until the earlier of (a) the date on which interest and/or penalties would first be payable thereon and (b) the date on which enforcement action is entitled to be taken by the related taxing authority.

(12) Condemnation. As of the date of origination and to the Sponsor’s knowledge as of the Cut-off Date, there is no proceeding pending, and, to the Sponsor’s knowledge as of the date of origination and as of the Cut-off Date, there is no proceeding threatened, for the total or partial condemnation of such Mortgaged Property that would have a material adverse effect on the value, use or operation of the Mortgaged Property.

(13) Actions Concerning Mortgage Loan. As of the date of origination and to the Sponsor’s knowledge as of the Cut-off Date, there was no pending or filed action, suit or proceeding, arbitration or governmental investigation involving any Mortgagor, guarantor, or Mortgagor’s interest in the Mortgaged Property, an adverse outcome of which would reasonably be expected to materially and adversely affect (a) such Mortgagor’s title to the Mortgaged Property, (b) the validity or enforceability of the Mortgage, (c) such Mortgagor’s ability to perform under the related Mortgage Loan, (d) such guarantor’s ability to perform under the related guaranty, (e) the principal benefit of the security intended to be provided by the Mortgage Loan documents or (f) the current principal use of the Mortgaged Property.

(14) Escrow Deposits. All escrow deposits and payments required to be escrowed with Mortgagee pursuant to each Mortgage Loan are in the possession, or under the control, of the Sponsor or its servicer, and there are no deficiencies (subject to any applicable grace or cure periods) in connection therewith, and all such escrows and deposits (or the right thereto) that are required to be escrowed with Mortgagee under the related Loan Documents are being conveyed by the Sponsor to Depositor or its servicer.

(15) No Holdbacks. The principal amount of the Mortgage Loan stated on the loan schedule attached as an exhibit to the applicable Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement has been fully disbursed as of the Closing Date and there is no requirement for future advances thereunder (except in those cases where the full amount of the Mortgage Loan has been disbursed but a portion thereof is being held in escrow or reserve accounts pending the satisfaction of certain conditions relating to leasing, repairs or other matters with respect to the related Mortgaged Property, the Mortgagor or other considerations determined by the Sponsor to merit such holdback).

(16) Insurance. Each related Mortgaged Property is, and is required pursuant to the related Mortgage to be, insured by a property insurance policy providing coverage for loss in accordance with coverage found under a “special cause of loss form” or “all risk form” that includes replacement cost valuation issued by an insurer meeting the requirements of the related Loan Documents and having a claims-paying or financial strength rating of at least “A-:VIII” from A.M. Best Company or “A3” (or the equivalent) from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or “A-” from Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (collectively the “Insurance Rating Requirements”), in an amount (subject to a customary deductible) not less than the lesser of (1) the original principal balance of the Mortgage Loan and (2) the full insurable value on a replacement cost basis of the improvements, furniture, furnishings, fixtures and equipment owned by the Mortgagor and included in the Mortgaged Property (with no deduction for physical depreciation), but, in any event, not less than the amount necessary or containing such endorsements as are necessary to avoid the operation of any coinsurance provisions with respect to the related Mortgaged Property.

Each related Mortgaged Property is also covered, and required to be covered pursuant to the related Loan Documents, by business interruption or rental loss insurance which (subject to a customary deductible) covers a period of not less than 12 months (or with respect to each Mortgage Loan on a single asset with a principal balance of $50 million or more, 18 months).

E-1-4

If any material part of the improvements, exclusive of a parking lot, located on a Mortgaged Property is in an area identified in the Federal Register by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as a “Special Flood Hazard Area,” the related Mortgagor is required to maintain insurance in the maximum amount available under the National Flood Insurance Program.

If the Mortgaged Property is located within 25 miles of the coast of the Gulf of Mexico or the Atlantic coast of Florida, Georgia, South Carolina or North Carolina, the related Mortgagor is required to maintain coverage for windstorm and/or windstorm related perils and/or “named storms” issued by an insurer meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements or endorsement covering damage from windstorm and/or windstorm related perils and/or named storms.

The Mortgaged Property is covered, and required to be covered pursuant to the related Loan Documents, by a commercial general liability insurance policy issued by an insurer meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements including coverage for property damage, contractual damage and personal injury (including bodily injury and death) in amounts as are generally required by prudent institutional commercial mortgage lenders, and in any event not less than $1 million per occurrence and $2 million in the aggregate.

An architectural or engineering consultant has performed an analysis of each of the Mortgaged Properties located in seismic zones 3 or 4 in order to evaluate the structural and seismic condition of such property, for the sole purpose of assessing the scenario expected limit (“SEL”) for the Mortgaged Property in the event of an earthquake. In such instance, the SEL was based on a 475-year return period, an exposure period of 50 years and a 10% probability of exceedance. If the resulting report concluded that the SEL would exceed 20% of the amount of the replacement costs of the improvements, earthquake insurance on such Mortgaged Property was obtained from an insurer rated at least “A:VIII” by A.M. Best Company or “A3” (or the equivalent) from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or “A-” by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services in an amount not less than 100% of the SEL.

The Loan Documents require insurance proceeds in respect of a property loss to be applied either (a) to the repair or restoration of all or part of the related Mortgaged Property, with respect to all property losses in excess of 5% of the then outstanding principal amount of the related Mortgage Loan (or related Loan Combination), the Mortgagee (or a trustee appointed by it) having the right to hold and disburse such proceeds as the repair or restoration progresses, or (b) to the payment of the outstanding principal balance of such Mortgage Loan together with any accrued interest thereon.

All premiums on all insurance policies referred to in this section required to be paid as of the Cut-off Date have been paid, and such insurance policies name the Mortgagee under the Mortgage Loan and its successors and assigns as a loss payee under a mortgagee endorsement clause or, in the case of the general liability insurance policy, as named or additional insured. Such insurance policies will inure to the benefit of the Trustee. Each related Mortgage Loan obligates the related Mortgagor to maintain all such insurance and, at such Mortgagor’s failure to do so, authorizes the Mortgagee to maintain such insurance at the Mortgagor’s reasonable cost and expense and to charge such Mortgagor for related premiums. All such insurance policies (other than commercial liability policies) require at least 10 days’ prior notice to the Mortgagee of termination or cancellation arising because of nonpayment of a premium and at least 30 days’ prior notice to the Mortgagee of termination or cancellation (or such lesser period, not less than 10 days, as may be required by applicable law) arising for any reason other than non-payment of a premium and no such notice has been received by the Sponsor.

(17) Access; Utilities; Separate Tax Lots. Each Mortgaged Property (a) is located on or adjacent to a public road and has direct legal access to such road, or has access via an irrevocable easement or irrevocable right of way permitting ingress and egress to/from a public road, (b) is served by or has uninhibited access rights to public or private water and sewer (or well and septic) and all required utilities, all of which are appropriate for the current use of the Mortgaged Property, and (c) constitutes one or more separate tax parcels which do not include any property which is not part of the Mortgaged Property or is subject to an endorsement under the related Title Policy insuring the Mortgaged Property, or in certain cases, an application has been, or will be, made to the applicable governing authority for creation of separate tax lots, in which case the Mortgage Loan requires the Mortgagor to escrow an amount sufficient to pay taxes for the existing tax parcel of which the Mortgaged Property is a part until the separate tax lots are created.

E-1-5

(18) No Encroachments. To the Sponsor’s knowledge based solely on surveys obtained in connection with origination and the Mortgagee’s Title Policy (or, if such policy is not yet issued, a pro forma title policy, a preliminary title policy with escrow instructions or a “marked up” commitment) obtained in connection with the origination of each Mortgage Loan, all material improvements that were included for the purpose of determining the appraised value of the related Mortgaged Property at the time of the origination of such Mortgage Loan are within the boundaries of the related Mortgaged Property, except encroachments that do not materially and adversely affect the value or current use of such Mortgaged Property or for which insurance or endorsements were obtained under the Title Policy. No improvements on adjoining parcels encroach onto the related Mortgaged Property except for encroachments that do not materially and adversely affect the value or current use of such Mortgaged Property or for which insurance or endorsements were obtained under the Title Policy. No improvements encroach upon any easements except for encroachments the removal of which would not materially and adversely affect the value or current use of such Mortgaged Property or for which insurance or endorsements were obtained under the Title Policy.

(19) No Contingent Interest or Equity Participation. No Mortgage Loan has a shared appreciation feature, any other contingent interest feature or a negative amortization feature or an equity participation by the Sponsor (except that any ARD Loan may provide for the accrual of the portion of interest in excess of the rate in effect prior to its related Anticipated Repayment Date).

(20) REMIC. The Mortgage Loan is a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Section 860G(a)(3) of the Code (but determined without regard to the rule in Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(f)(2) that treats certain defective mortgage loans as qualified mortgages), and, accordingly, (A) the issue price of the Mortgage Loan to the related Mortgagor at origination did not exceed the non-contingent principal amount of the Mortgage Loan and (B) either: (a) such Mortgage Loan is secured by an interest in real property (including buildings and structural components thereof, but excluding personal property) having a fair market value (i) at the date the Mortgage Loan (or related Loan Combination) was originated at least equal to 80% of the adjusted issue price of the Mortgage Loan (or related Loan Combination) on such date or (ii) at the Closing Date at least equal to 80% of the adjusted issue price of the Mortgage Loan (or related Loan Combination) on such date, provided that for purposes hereof, the fair market value of the real property interest must first be reduced by (A) the amount of any lien on the real property interest that is senior to the Mortgage Loan and (B) a proportionate amount of any lien that is in parity with the Mortgage Loan; or (b) substantially all of the proceeds of such Mortgage Loan were used to acquire, improve or protect the real property which served as the only security for such Mortgage Loan (other than a recourse feature or other third-party credit enhancement within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(a)(1)(ii)). If the Mortgage Loan was “significantly modified” prior to the Closing Date so as to result in a taxable exchange under Section 1001 of the Code, it either (x) was modified as a result of the default or reasonably foreseeable default of such Mortgage Loan or (y) satisfies the provisions of either sub-clause (B)(a)(i) above (substituting the date of the last such modification for the date the Mortgage Loan was originated) or sub-clause (B)(a)(ii), including the proviso thereto. Any prepayment premium and yield maintenance charges applicable to the Mortgage Loan constitute “customary prepayment penalties” within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-1(b)(2). All terms used in this paragraph shall have the same meanings as set forth in the related Treasury Regulations.

(21) Compliance with Usury Laws. The Mortgage Rate (exclusive of any default interest, late charges, yield maintenance charge, or prepayment premiums) of such Mortgage Loan complied as of the date of origination with, or was exempt from, applicable state or federal laws, regulations and other requirements pertaining to usury.

(22) Authorized to do Business. To the extent required under applicable law, as of the Cut-off Date or as of the date that such entity held the Mortgage Note, each holder of the Mortgage Note was authorized to originate, acquire and/or hold (as applicable) the Mortgage Note in the jurisdiction in which each related Mortgaged Property is located, or the failure to be so authorized does not materially and adversely affect the enforceability of such Mortgage Loan by the Trust.

(23) Trustee under Deed of Trust. With respect to each Mortgage which is a deed of trust, as of the date of origination and, to the Sponsor’s knowledge, as of the Closing Date, a trustee, duly qualified under

E-1-6

applicable law to serve as such, currently so serves and is named in the deed of trust or has been substituted in accordance with the Mortgage and applicable law or may be substituted in accordance with the Mortgage and applicable law by the related Mortgagee.

(24) Local Law Compliance. To the Sponsor’s knowledge, based upon any of a letter from any governmental authorities, a legal opinion, an architect’s letter, a zoning consultant’s report, an endorsement to the related Title Policy, or other affirmative investigation of local law compliance consistent with the investigation conducted by the Sponsor for similar commercial and multifamily mortgage loans intended for securitization, there are no material violations of applicable zoning ordinances, building codes and land laws (collectively “Zoning Regulations”) with respect to the improvements located on or forming part of each Mortgaged Property securing a Mortgage Loan as of the date of origination of such Mortgage Loan (or related Loan Combination, as applicable) or as of the Cut-off Date, other than those which (i) are insured by the Title Policy or a law and ordinance insurance policy or (ii) would not have a material adverse effect on the value, operation or net operating income of the Mortgaged Property. The terms of the Loan Documents require the Mortgagor to comply in all material respects with all applicable governmental regulations, zoning and building laws.

(25) Licenses and Permits. Each Mortgagor covenants in the Loan Documents that it shall keep all material licenses, permits and applicable governmental authorizations necessary for its operation of the Mortgaged Property in full force and effect, and to the Sponsor’s knowledge based upon any of a letter from any government authorities or other affirmative investigation of local law compliance consistent with the investigation conducted by the Sponsor for similar commercial and multifamily mortgage loans intended for securitization, all such material licenses, permits and applicable governmental authorizations are in effect. The Mortgage Loan requires the related Mortgagor to be qualified to do business in the jurisdiction in which the related Mortgaged Property is located.

(26) Recourse Obligations. The Loan Documents for each Mortgage Loan provide that such Mortgage Loan (a) becomes full recourse to the Mortgagor and guarantor (which is a natural person or persons, or an entity distinct from the Mortgagor (but may be affiliated with the Mortgagor) that has assets other than equity in the related Mortgaged Property that are not de minimis) in any of the following events: (i) if any voluntary petition for bankruptcy, insolvency, dissolution or liquidation pursuant to federal bankruptcy law, or any similar federal or state law, shall be filed by the Mortgagor; (ii) the Mortgagor or guarantor shall have colluded with (or, alternatively, solicited or caused to be solicited) other creditors to cause an involuntary bankruptcy filing with respect to the Mortgagor or (iii) voluntary transfers of either the Mortgaged Property or equity interests in Mortgagor made in violation of the Loan Documents; and (b) contains provisions providing for recourse against the Mortgagor and guarantor (which is a natural person or persons, or an entity distinct from the Mortgagor (but may be affiliated with the Mortgagor) that has assets other than equity in the related Mortgaged Property that are not de minimis), for losses and damages sustained by reason of Mortgagor’s (i) misappropriation of rents after the occurrence of an event of default under the Mortgage Loan; (ii) misappropriation of (A) insurance proceeds or condemnation awards or (B) security deposits or, alternatively, the failure of any security deposits to be delivered to Mortgagee upon foreclosure or action in lieu thereof (except to the extent applied in accordance with leases prior to a Mortgage Loan event of default); (iii) fraud or intentional material misrepresentation; (iv) breaches of the environmental covenants in the Loan Documents; or (v) commission of intentional material physical waste at the Mortgaged Property (but, in some cases, only to the extent there is sufficient cash flow generated by the related Mortgaged Property to prevent such waste).

(27) Mortgage Releases. The terms of the related Mortgage or related Loan Documents do not provide for release of any material portion of the Mortgaged Property from the lien of the Mortgage except (a) a partial release, accompanied by principal repayment, of not less than a specified percentage at least equal to the lesser of (i) 110% of the related allocated loan amount of such portion of the Mortgaged Property and (ii) the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan, (b) upon payment in full of such Mortgage Loan, (c) upon a Defeasance defined in (32) below, (d) releases of out-parcels that are unimproved or other portions of the Mortgaged Property which will not have a material adverse effect on the underwritten value of the Mortgaged Property and which were not afforded any material value in the appraisal obtained at the origination of the Mortgage Loan and are not necessary for physical access to the Mortgaged Property or compliance with zoning requirements, or (e) as required pursuant to an order

E-1-7

of condemnation or taking by a State or any political subdivision or authority thereof. With respect to any partial release under the preceding clauses (a) or (d), either: (x) such release of collateral (i) would not constitute a “significant modification” of the subject Mortgage Loan within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(b)(2) and (ii) would not cause the subject Mortgage Loan to fail to be a “qualified mortgage” within the meaning of Section 860G(a)(3)(A) of the Code; or (y) the Mortgagee or servicer can, in accordance with the related Loan Documents, condition such release of collateral on the related Mortgagor’s delivery of an opinion of tax counsel to the effect specified in the immediately preceding clause (x). For purposes of the preceding clause (x), for all Mortgage Loans originated after December 6, 2010, if the fair market value of the real property constituting such Mortgaged Property after the release is not equal to at least 80% of the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan (or related Loan Combination) outstanding after the release, the Mortgagor is required to make a payment of principal in an amount not less than the amount required by the REMIC Provisions.

With respect to any partial release under the preceding clause (e), for all Mortgage Loans originated after December 6, 2010, the Mortgagor can be required to pay down the principal balance of the Mortgage Loan in an amount not less than the amount required by the REMIC Provisions and, to such extent, such amount may not be required to be applied to the restoration of the Mortgaged Property or released to the Mortgagor, if, immediately after the release of such portion of the Mortgaged Property from the lien of the Mortgage (but taking into account the planned restoration) the fair market value of the real property constituting the remaining Mortgaged Property is not equal to at least 80% of the remaining principal balance of the Mortgage Loan (or related Loan Combination).

No Mortgage Loan that is secured by more than one Mortgaged Property or that is cross-collateralized with another Mortgage Loan permits the release of cross-collateralization of the related Mortgaged Properties or a portion thereof, including due to partial condemnation, other than in compliance with the REMIC Provisions.

(28) Financial Reporting and Rent Rolls. The Mortgage Loan documents for each Mortgage Loan require the Mortgagor to provide the owner or holder of the Mortgage with quarterly (other than for single-tenant properties) and annual operating statements, and quarterly (other than for single-tenant properties) rent rolls for properties that have leases contributing more than 5% of the in-place base rent and annual financial statements, which annual financial statements with respect to each Mortgage Loan with more than one Mortgagor are in the form of an annual combined balance sheet of the Mortgagor entities (and no other entities), together with the related combined statements of operations, members’ capital and cash flows, including a combining balance sheet and statement of income for the Mortgaged Properties on a combined basis.

(29) Acts of Terrorism Exclusion. With respect to each Mortgage Loan over $20 million, the related special-form all-risk insurance policy and business interruption policy (issued by an insurer meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements) do not specifically exclude Acts of Terrorism, as defined in the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, as amended by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007, and as amended by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015 (collectively referred to as “TRIA”), from coverage, or if such coverage is excluded, it is covered by a separate terrorism insurance policy. With respect to each other Mortgage Loan, the related special all-risk insurance policy and business interruption policy (issued by an insurer meeting the Insurance Rating Requirements) did not, as of the date of origination of the Mortgage Loan, and, to the Sponsor’s knowledge, do not, as of the Cut-off Date, specifically exclude Acts of Terrorism, as defined in TRIA, from coverage, or if such coverage is excluded, it is covered by a separate terrorism insurance policy. With respect to each Mortgage Loan, the related Loan Documents do not expressly waive or prohibit the Mortgagee from requiring coverage for Acts of Terrorism, as defined in TRIA, or damages related thereto; provided, however, that if TRIA or a similar or subsequent statute is not in effect, then, provided that terrorism insurance is commercially available, the Mortgagor under each Mortgage Loan is required to carry terrorism insurance, but in such event the Mortgagor shall not be required to spend more than the Terrorism Cap Amount on terrorism insurance coverage, and if the cost of terrorism insurance exceeds the Terrorism Cap Amount, the Mortgagor is required to purchase the maximum amount of terrorism insurance available with funds equal to the Terrorism Cap Amount. The “Terrorism Cap Amount” is the specified percentage (which is at least equal to 200%) of the amount of the insurance premium that is payable at such time in respect of the property and business interruption/rental loss insurance required

E-1-8

under the related Loan Documents (without giving effect to the cost of terrorism and earthquake components of such casualty and business interruption/rental loss insurance).

(30) Due on Sale or Encumbrance. Subject to specific exceptions set forth below, each Mortgage Loan contains a “due on sale” or other such provision for the acceleration of the payment of the unpaid principal balance of such Mortgage Loan if, without the consent of the holder of the Mortgage (which consent, in some cases, may not be unreasonably withheld) and/or complying with the requirements of the related Loan Documents (which provide for transfers without the consent of the Mortgagee which are customarily acceptable to prudent commercial and multifamily mortgage lending institutions lending on the security of property comparable to the related Mortgaged Property, including, without limitation, transfers of worn-out or obsolete furnishings, fixtures, or equipment promptly replaced with property of equivalent value and functionality and transfers by leases entered into in accordance with the Loan Documents), (a) the related Mortgaged Property, or any equity interest of greater than 50% in the related Mortgagor, is directly or indirectly pledged, transferred or sold, other than as related to (i) family and estate planning transfers or transfers upon death or legal incapacity, (ii) transfers to certain affiliates as defined in the related Loan Documents, (iii) transfers of less than, or other than, a controlling interest in the related Mortgagor, (iv) transfers to another holder of direct or indirect equity in the Mortgagor, a specific Person designated in the related Loan Documents or a Person satisfying specific criteria identified in the related Loan Documents, such as a qualified equityholder, (v) transfers of stock or similar equity units in publicly traded companies or (vi) a substitution or release of collateral within the parameters of paragraphs (27) and (32) of this Annex E-1 or the exceptions thereto set forth on Annex E-2, or (vii) as set forth on an exhibit to the applicable Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement by reason of any mezzanine debt that existed at the origination of the related Mortgage Loan, or future permitted mezzanine debt as set forth on an exhibit to the applicable Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement or (b) the related Mortgaged Property is encumbered with a subordinate lien or security interest against the related Mortgaged Property, other than (i) any Companion Loan of any Mortgage Loan or any subordinate debt that existed at origination and is permitted under the related Loan Documents, (ii) purchase money security interests (iii) any Mortgage Loan that is cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with another Mortgage Loan, as set forth on an exhibit to the applicable Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement or (iv) Permitted Encumbrances. The Mortgage or other Loan Documents provide that to the extent any Rating Agency fees are incurred in connection with the review of and consent to any transfer or encumbrance, the Mortgagor is responsible for such payment along with all other reasonable out-of-pocket fees and expenses incurred by the Mortgagee relative to such transfer or encumbrance.

(31) Single-Purpose Entity. Each Mortgage Loan requires the Mortgagor to be a Single-Purpose Entity for at least as long as the Mortgage Loan is outstanding. Both the Loan Documents and the organizational documents of the Mortgagor with respect to each Mortgage Loan with a Cut-off Date Principal Balance in excess of $5 million provide that the Mortgagor is a Single-Purpose Entity, and each Mortgage Loan with a Cut-off Date Principal Balance of $20 million or more has a counsel’s opinion regarding non-consolidation of the Mortgagor. For this purpose, a “Single-Purpose Entity” shall mean an entity, other than an individual, whose organizational documents (or if the Mortgage Loan has a Cut-off Date Principal Balance equal to $5 million or less, its organizational documents or the related Loan Documents) provide substantially to the effect that it was formed or organized solely for the purpose of owning and operating one or more of the Mortgaged Properties securing the Mortgage Loans and prohibit it from engaging in any business unrelated to such Mortgaged Property or Properties, and whose organizational documents further provide, or which entity represented in the related Loan Documents, substantially to the effect that it does not have any assets other than those related to its interest in and operation of such Mortgaged Property or Properties, or any indebtedness other than as permitted by the related Mortgage(s) or the other related Loan Documents, that it has its own books and records and accounts separate and apart from those of any other person (other than a Mortgagor for a Mortgage Loan that is cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with the related Mortgage Loan), and that it holds itself out as a legal entity, separate and apart from any other person or entity.

(32) Defeasance. With respect to any Mortgage Loan that, pursuant to the Loan Documents, can be defeased (a “Defeasance”), (i) the Loan Documents provide for defeasance as a unilateral right of the Mortgagor, subject to satisfaction of conditions specified in the Loan Documents; (ii) the Mortgage Loan cannot be defeased within two years after the Closing Date; (iii) the Mortgagor is permitted to pledge only United States “government securities” within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.860G-2(a)(8)(ii), the

E-1-9

revenues from which will, in the case of a full Defeasance, be sufficient to make all scheduled payments under the Mortgage Loan when due, including the entire remaining principal balance on the maturity date (or on or after the first date on which payment may be made without payment of a yield maintenance charge or prepayment penalty) or, if the Mortgage Loan is an ARD Loan, the entire principal balance outstanding on the related Anticipated Repayment Date (or on or after the first date on which payment may be made without payment of a yield maintenance charge or prepayment penalty), and if the Mortgage Loan permits partial releases of real property in connection with partial defeasance, the revenues from the collateral will be sufficient to pay all such scheduled payments calculated on a principal amount equal to a specified percentage at least equal to the lesser of (A) 110% of the allocated loan amount for the real property to be released and (B) the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan; (iv) the Mortgagor is required to provide a certification from an independent certified public accountant that the collateral is sufficient to make all scheduled payments under the Mortgage Note as set forth in (iii) above, (v) if the Mortgagor would continue to own assets in addition to the defeasance collateral, the portion of the Mortgage Loan secured by defeasance collateral is required to be assumed (or the Mortgagee may require such assumption) by a Single-Purpose Entity; (vi) the Mortgagor is required to provide an opinion of counsel that the Mortgagee has a perfected security interest in such collateral prior to any other claim or interest; and (vii) the Mortgagor is required to pay all rating agency fees associated with defeasance (if rating confirmation is a specific condition precedent thereto) and all other reasonable out-of-pocket expenses associated with defeasance, including, but not limited to, accountant’s fees and opinions of counsel.

(33) Fixed Interest Rates. Each Mortgage Loan bears interest at a rate that remains fixed throughout the remaining term of such Mortgage Loan, except in the case of ARD Loans and in situations where default interest is imposed.

(34) Ground Leases. For purposes of this Annex E-1, a “Ground Lease” shall mean a lease creating a leasehold estate in real property where the fee owner as the ground lessor conveys for a term or terms of years its entire interest in the land and buildings and other improvements, if any, comprising the premises demised under such lease to the ground lessee (who may, in certain circumstances, own the building and improvements on the land), subject to the reversionary interest of the ground lessor as fee owner and does not include industrial development agency (IDA) or similar leases for purposes of conferring a tax abatement or other benefit.

With respect to any Mortgage Loan where the Mortgage Loan is secured by a leasehold estate under a Ground Lease in whole or in part, and the related Mortgage does not also encumber the related lessor’s fee interest in such Mortgaged Property, based upon the terms of the Ground Lease and any estoppel or other agreement received from the ground lessor in favor of the Sponsor, its successors and assigns, the Sponsor represents and warrants that:

(a) The Ground Lease or a memorandum regarding such Ground Lease has been duly recorded or submitted for recordation in a form that is acceptable for recording in the applicable jurisdiction. The Ground Lease or an estoppel or other agreement received from the ground lessor permits the interest of the lessee to be encumbered by the related Mortgage and does not restrict the use of the related Mortgaged Property by such lessee, its successors or assigns in a manner that would materially adversely affect the security provided by the related Mortgage. No material change in the terms of the Ground Lease had occurred since the origination of the Mortgage Loan, except as reflected in any written instruments which are included in the related Mortgage File;

(b) The lessor under such Ground Lease has agreed in a writing included in the related Mortgage File (or in such Ground Lease) that the Ground Lease may not be amended or modified, or canceled or terminated by agreement of lessor and lessee, without the prior written consent of the Mortgagee;

(c) The Ground Lease has an original term (or an original term plus one or more optional renewal terms, which, under all circumstances, may be exercised, and will be enforceable, by either Mortgagor or the Mortgagee) that extends not less than 20 years beyond the stated maturity of the related Mortgage Loan, or ten years past the stated maturity if such Mortgage Loan fully

E-1-10

amortizes by the stated maturity (or with respect to a Mortgage Loan that accrues on an actual 360 basis, substantially amortizes);

(d) The Ground Lease either (i) is not subject to any liens or encumbrances superior to, or of equal priority with, the Mortgage, except for the related fee interest of the ground lessor and the Permitted Encumbrances, or (ii) is subject to a subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreement to which the Mortgagee on the lessor’s fee interest in the Mortgaged Property is subject;

(e) The Ground Lease does not place commercially unreasonably restrictions on the identity of the Mortgagee and the Ground Lease is assignable to the holder of the Mortgage Loan and its successors and assigns without the consent of the lessor thereunder (provided that proper notice is delivered to the extent required in accordance with the Ground Lease), and in the event it is so assigned, it is further assignable by the holder of the Mortgage Loan and its successors and assigns without the consent of (but with prior notice to) the lessor;

(f) The Sponsor has not received any written notice of material default under or notice of termination of such Ground Lease. To the Sponsor’s knowledge, there is no material default under such Ground Lease and no condition that, but for the passage of time or giving of notice, would result in a material default under the terms of such Ground Lease and to the Sponsor’s knowledge, such Ground Lease is in full force and effect as of the Closing Date;

(g) The Ground Lease or ancillary agreement between the lessor and the lessee requires the lessor to give to the Mortgagee written notice of any default, and provides that no notice of default or termination is effective against the Mortgagee unless such notice is given to the Mortgagee;

(h) The Mortgagee is permitted a reasonable opportunity (including, where necessary, sufficient time to gain possession of the interest of the lessee under the Ground Lease through legal proceedings) to cure any default under the Ground Lease which is curable after the Mortgagee’s receipt of notice of any default before the lessor may terminate the Ground Lease;

(i) The Ground Lease does not impose any restrictions on subletting that would be viewed as commercially unreasonable by a prudent commercial mortgage lender;

(j) Under the terms of the Ground Lease, an estoppel or other agreement received from the ground lessor and the related Mortgage (taken together), any related insurance proceeds or the portion of the condemnation award allocable to the ground lessee’s interest (other than (i) de minimis amounts for minor casualties or (ii) in respect of a total or substantially total loss or taking as addressed in subpart (k)) will be applied either to the repair or to restoration of all or part of the related Mortgaged Property with (so long as such proceeds are in excess of the threshold amount specified in the related Loan Documents) the Mortgagee or a trustee appointed by it having the right to hold and disburse such proceeds as repair or restoration progresses, or to the payment of the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan, together with any accrued interest;

(k) In the case of a total or substantially total taking or loss, under the terms of the Ground Lease, an estoppel or other agreement and the related Mortgage (taken together), any related insurance proceeds, or portion of the condemnation award allocable to the ground lessee’s interest in respect of a total or substantially total loss or taking of the related Mortgaged Property to the extent not applied to restoration, will be applied first to the payment of the outstanding principal balance of the Mortgage Loan, together with any accrued interest; and

(l) Provided that the Mortgagee cures any defaults which are susceptible to being cured, the ground lessor has agreed to enter into a new lease with the Mortgagee upon termination of the Ground Lease for any reason, including rejection of the Ground Lease in a bankruptcy proceeding.

(35) Servicing. The servicing and collection practices used by the Sponsor with respect to the Mortgage Loan have been, in all respects, legal and have met customary industry standards for servicing of commercial loans for conduit loan programs.

E-1-11

(36) Origination and Underwriting. The origination practices of the Sponsor (or the related originator if the Sponsor was not the originator) with respect to each Mortgage Loan have been, in all material respects, legal and as of the date of its origination, such Mortgage Loan (or the related Loan Combination, as applicable) and the origination thereof complied in all material respects with, or was exempt from, all requirements of federal, state or local law relating to the origination of such Mortgage Loan; provided that such representation and warranty does not address or otherwise cover any matters with respect to federal, state or local law otherwise covered in this Annex E-1.

(37) No Material Default; Payment Record. No Mortgage Loan has been more than 30 days delinquent, without giving effect to any grace or cure period, in making required debt service payments since origination and, as of the date hereof, no Mortgage Loan is more than 30 days delinquent (beyond any applicable grace or cure period) in making required payments as of the Closing Date. To the Sponsor’s knowledge, there is (a) no material default, breach, violation or event of acceleration existing under the related Mortgage Loan, or (b) no event (other than payments due but not yet delinquent) which, with the passage of time or with notice and the expiration of any grace or cure period, would constitute a material default, breach, violation or event of acceleration, which default, breach, violation or event of acceleration, in the case of either (a) or (b), materially and adversely affects the value of the Mortgage Loan or the value, use or operation of the related Mortgaged Property, provided, however, that this representation and warranty does not cover any default, breach, violation or event of acceleration that specifically pertains to or arises out of an exception scheduled to any other representation and warranty made by the Sponsor in this Annex E-1 (including, but not limited to, the prior sentence). No person other than the holder of such Mortgage Loan may declare any event of default under the Mortgage Loan or accelerate any indebtedness under the Mortgage Loan documents.

(38) Bankruptcy. As of the date of origination of the related Mortgage Loan and to the Sponsor’s knowledge as of the Cut-off Date, neither the Mortgaged Property (other than any tenants of such Mortgaged Property), nor any portion thereof, is the subject of, and no Mortgagor, guarantor or tenant occupying a single-tenant property is a debtor in state or federal bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceeding.

(39) Organization of Mortgagor. With respect to each Mortgage Loan, in reliance on certified copies of the organizational documents of the Mortgagor delivered by the Mortgagor in connection with the origination of such Mortgage Loan (or related Loan Combination, as applicable), the Mortgagor is an entity organized under the laws of a state of the United States of America, the District of Columbia or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Except with respect to any Mortgage Loan that is cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with another Mortgage Loan, no Mortgage Loan has a Mortgagor that is an affiliate of another Mortgagor under another Mortgage Loan.

(40) Environmental Conditions. A Phase I environmental site assessment (or update of a previous Phase I and or Phase II site assessment) and, with respect to certain Mortgage Loans, a Phase II environmental site assessment (collectively, an “ESA”) meeting ASTM requirements were conducted by a reputable environmental consultant in connection with such Mortgage Loan within 12 months prior to its origination date (or an update of a previous ESA was prepared), and such ESA (i) did not identify the existence of recognized environmental conditions (as such term is defined in ASTM E1527-05 or its successor, an “Environmental Condition”) at the related Mortgaged Property or the need for further investigation, or (ii) if the existence of an Environmental Condition or need for further investigation was indicated in any such ESA, then at least one of the following statements is true: (A) an amount reasonably estimated by a reputable environmental consultant to be sufficient to cover the estimated cost to cure any material noncompliance with applicable Environmental Laws or the Environmental Condition has been escrowed by the related Mortgagor and is held or controlled by the related Mortgagee; (B) if the only Environmental Condition relates to the presence of asbestos-containing materials, radon in indoor air, lead based paint or lead in drinking water, the only recommended action in the ESA is the institution of such a plan, an operations or maintenance plan has been required to be instituted by the related Mortgagor that, based on the ESA, can reasonably be expected to mitigate the identified risk; (C) the Environmental Condition identified in the related environmental report was remediated or abated in all material respects prior to the date hereof, and, if and as appropriate, a no further action or closure letter was obtained from the applicable governmental regulatory authority (or the environmental issue affecting the related Mortgaged Property was otherwise listed by such governmental authority as “closed” or a reputable environmental consultant has concluded that no further action is required); (D) an environmental policy or a lender’s

E-1-12

pollution legal liability insurance policy meeting the requirements set forth below that covers liability for the identified circumstance or condition was obtained from an insurer rated no less than A- (or the equivalent) by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and/or Fitch Ratings, Inc.; (E) a party not related to the Mortgagor was identified as the responsible party for such condition or circumstance and such responsible party has financial resources reasonably estimated to be adequate to address the situation; or (F) a party related to the Mortgagor having financial resources reasonably estimated to be adequate to address the situation is required to take action. To the Sponsor’s knowledge, except as set forth in the ESA, there is no Environmental Condition (as such term is defined in ASTM E1527-05 or its successor) at the related Mortgaged Property.

(41) Appraisal. The Mortgage File contains an appraisal of the related Mortgaged Property with an appraisal date within six months of the Mortgage Loan origination date, and within 12 months of the Closing Date. The appraisal is signed by an appraiser who is a Member of the Appraisal Institute (“MAI”) and, to the Sponsor’s knowledge, had no interest, direct or indirect, in the Mortgaged Property or the Mortgagor or in any loan made on the security thereof, and whose compensation is not affected by the approval or disapproval of the Mortgage Loan. Each appraiser has represented in such appraisal or in a supplemental letter that the appraisal satisfies the requirements of the “Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice” as adopted by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation. Each appraisal contains a statement, or is accompanied by a letter from the appraiser, to the effect that the appraisal was performed in accordance with the requirements of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989, as in effect on the date such Mortgage Loan was originated.

(42) Mortgage Loan Schedule. The information pertaining to each Mortgage Loan which is set forth in the loan schedule attached as an exhibit to the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement is true and correct in all material respects as of the Cut-off Date and contains all information required by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement to be contained therein.

(43) Cross-Collateralization. Except with respect to a Mortgage Loan that is part of a Loan Combination, no Mortgage Loan is cross-collateralized or cross-defaulted with any other Mortgage Loan that is outside the Mortgage Pool, except as set forth on Annex E-2.

(44) Advance of Funds by the Sponsor. After origination, no advance of funds has been made by the Sponsor to the related Mortgagor other than in accordance with the Loan Documents, and, to the Sponsor’s knowledge, no funds have been received from any person other than the related Mortgagor or an affiliate for, or on account of, payments due on the Mortgage Loan (other than as contemplated by the Loan Documents, such as, by way of example and not in limitation of the foregoing, amounts paid by the tenant(s) into a Mortgagee-controlled lockbox if required or contemplated under the related lease or Loan Documents). Neither the Sponsor nor any affiliate thereof has any obligation to make any capital contribution to any Mortgagor under a Mortgage Loan, other than contributions made on or prior to the date hereof.

(45) Compliance with Anti-Money Laundering Laws. The Sponsor has complied in all material respects with all applicable anti-money laundering laws and regulations, including without limitation the USA Patriot Act of 2001 with respect to the origination of the Mortgage Loan.

For purposes of these representations and warranties, “Mortgagee” means the mortgagee, grantee or beneficiary under any Mortgage, any holder of legal title to any portion of any Mortgage Loan or, if applicable, any agent or servicer on behalf of such party.

For purposes of these representations and warranties, the phrases “the Sponsor’s knowledge” or “the Sponsor’s belief” and other words and phrases of like import mean, except where otherwise expressly set forth in these representations and warranties, the actual state of knowledge or belief of the Sponsor, its officers and employees directly responsible for the underwriting, origination, servicing or sale of the Mortgage Loans regarding the matters expressly set forth in these representations and warranties.

E-1-13

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

ANNEX E-2

EXCEPTIONS TO SPONSOR REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES

The exceptions to the representations and warranties set forth below are grouped by Sponsor and listed by the number of the related representation and warranty set forth on Annex E-1 to this prospectus supplement and the Mortgaged Property name and number identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Annex E-2 will have the meanings set forth in this prospectus supplement or, if not defined in this prospectus supplement, in the related Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement.

Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.

Representation Number on Annex E-1	Mortgaged Property Name and Mortgage Loan Number as Identified on Annex A	Description of Exception
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance	Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio (Loan No. 10)	Each of the single tenants at each of the Mortgaged Properties identified on Annex A to this prospectus supplement as Dale Ave Roanoke, Plantation Road Walmart and Walmart Orange Avenue possess a right of first refusal (“ROFR”) exercisable upon the proposed sale of the related Mortgaged Property by the related Mortgagor, the related lender, or any purchaser at a foreclosure sale. The ROFR is not exercisable upon a foreclosure sale or a transfer in lieu of foreclosure.
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance	Easy Stop Storage Portfolio (Loan No. 34)	The Mortgaged Property identified as Easy Stop Storage - Odessa Loop is subject to a recorded oil and gas lease.
(16) Insurance	The Decoration & Design Building (Loan No. 3)	To the extent the terms of the ground lease and the Mortgage Loan Documents conflict with respect to the holding and disbursement of net proceeds, the terms of the ground lease control provided that the ground lease requires the net proceeds to be applied to restoration. In the event of a casualty or condemnation in excess of $25,000, the proceeds are distributed to a trustee selected by the landlord and Mortgagor (the “Trustee”). The Mortgagor is not permitted to approve any Trustee without the lender’s reasonable approval and any such Trustee is required to maintain a long term unsecured debt rating of at least “A” from S&P.
(16) Insurance	Virginia Walmart Neighborhood Market Portfolio (Loan No. 10)	The Mortgagor is deemed to be in compliance with the Mortgage Loan Documents without maintaining the insurance coverage required under the Mortgage Loan Documents provided that (i) the leases of certain specified tenants (“Virginia Specified Tenants”) at the Mortgaged Property are in full force and effect; (ii) no default beyond any applicable notice and cure period has occurred and is continuing under such Virginia Specified Tenant lease, (iii) the Virginia Specified Tenant under such lease or the guarantor thereof remains fully liable for the obligations and liabilities under such lease and maintains a credit rating from S&P of at least “BBB”, (iv) such lease will remain in full force and effect following a casualty and the Virginia Specified Tenant thereunder is obligated per the terms of such lease to rebuild and/or repair the Mortgaged Property at its sole cost and expense and is entitled to no period of rent abatement, (v) such Virginia Specified Tenant maintains, either through a program of self-insurance or otherwise, the insurance required to be maintained by it under such lease, and (vi) the Mortgagor has provided to Seller evidence satisfactory to Seller that the Virginia Specified Tenant under such lease maintains in full force and effect the insurance described in clause (v) above.
(24) Local Law Compliance	The Decoration & Design Building (Loan No. 3)	Façade work is required at the Mortgaged Property in order to bring the Mortgaged Property into compliance with local law 11. The Mortgagor has reserved the cost of the completion of the façade work with the Lender and has covenanted to complete the façade work within six (6) months of origination of the Mortgage Loan (provided that, so long as the failure to complete the work does not cause a material adverse effect and the Mortgagor continues to diligently pursue completion of the applicable work, such time shall be extended to the extent necessary).

E-2-1

Representation Number on Annex E-1	Mortgaged Property Name and Mortgage Loan Number as Identified on Annex A	Description of Exception
(26) Recourse Obligations	Illinois Center (Loan No. 1)	The Loan Documents for the related Mortgage Loan provide that the Mortgage Loan becomes full recourse to the Mortgagor and guarantor in the event of any transfer of the Mortgaged Property or any equity interests in the Mortgagor that violates the transfer provisions contained in the Mortgage Loan Documents and is either material or deliberate. Further, the related Mortgage Loan Documents provide that the Mortgage Loan becomes recourse to the Mortgagor and the guarantor for any losses incurred by the lender in the event of any breach of the transfer provisions of the related Mortgage Loan Documents unless (i) such breach was inadvertent and immaterial, (ii) the related Mortgagor cures such breach within 30 days of receipt of notice thereof and provides the related lender notice of the breach, and (iii) upon the related lender’s request, the related Mortgagor provides a new non-consolidation opinion or opinion that the breach does not impair the existing non-consolidation opinion.
(26) Recourse Obligations	University Place (Loan No. 9)	With respect to clause (a)(iii) of the representation, the Mortgage Loan shall become full recourse to Borrower in the event of a breach of the transfer provisions of the related Mortgage Loan Documents as a result of a voluntary transfer, other than a voluntary transfer which constitutes (i) a transfer in connection with an eminent domain proceeding or (ii) the granting of an easement (or similar agreement) or the leasing of a portion of the related Mortgaged Property, in each case, in the ordinary course of Borrower’s business and to a person who is not the related Mortgagor or an affiliate of the Mortgagor.
(31) Single-Purpose Entity	Premiere Building (Loan No. 30)	The related Mortgagor owned an unrelated property prior to the origination of the related Mortgage Loan.
(31) Single-Purpose Entity	Stadium Plaza (Loan No. 14)	The related Mortgagor previously owned an outparcel that is part of the larger retail center that includes the Mortgaged Property.
(34) Ground Leases	The Decoration & Design Building (Loan No. 3)	(b) The related ground lease states that it may not be modified or surrendered without the consent of the lender; it does not specifically state that it may not be amended without the consent of the lender. (j,k) The ground lease provides that all casualty / condemnation proceeds (the “Proceeds”) are required to, if the same are (a) less than $25,000, be disbursed to the Mortgagor and (b) in excess of $25,000, be disbursed to a trustee selected by Mortgagee and the tenant (the “Trustee”). Under the Mortgage Loan Documents, the Mortgagor are required to obtain the lender’s prior written consent to the identity of the Trustee. Other than is the case of a total taking, the Proceeds are required to be used to restore the Mortgaged Property (and, in such event, if any proceeds shall have been distributed to the landlord, the landlord shall be obligated to make the Proceeds available for restoration). The ground lease is not made subordinate to any fee mortgages and further provides that (i) any provision relating to insurance being carried in favor of fee mortgagee shall not give fee mortgage any greater rights to such insurance proceeds than those the landlord has under the ground lease and (ii) in addition to any other available remedies, the Mortgagor is entitled to payment from the landlord (and ground rent credits if the landlord fails to so pay) in an amount equal to any portion of insurance proceeds retained by any fee mortgagee.

E-2-2

Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company

Representation Number on Annex E-1	Mortgaged Property Name and Mortgage Loan Number as Identified on Annex A	Description of Exception
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance	Hammons Hotel Portfolio (Loan No. 2)	JD Holdings, L.L.C. has (i) a right of first refusal to purchase the Mortgaged Properties if there is a proposed bona fide sale of such Mortgaged Properties and (ii) a right to purchase the Mortgaged Properties upon the redemption (or other disposition) of the preferred interest of the John Q. Hammons Revocable Trust in Atrium Hotels, L.P. (formerly known as the John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P.), which redemption is subject to litigation set forth in the exception to Representation and Warranty No. 13. Marriott International, Inc., the franchisor, has a right of first refusal to purchase the Renaissance Glendale, Arizona Mortgaged Property if there is a proposed transfer of such Mortgaged Property to a competitor.
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance	AkzoNobel Coatings (Loan No. 60)	The AkzoNobel, Inc. tenant has a right of first offer to purchase the Mortgaged Property.
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance	4238 West Hundred Road (Loan No. 61)	The Walgreens tenant has a right of first refusal to purchase the Mortgaged Property.
(13) Actions Concerning Mortgage Loan	Hammons Hotel Portfolio (Loan No. 2)	The related Mortgagors and borrower sponsor are defendants in a lawsuit brought by JD Holdings, L.L.C. seeking clarification of its rights of first refusal and right to cause certain borrowers and their affiliates to offer certain properties, including the Mortgaged Properties for sale in connection with the liquidation of the preferred interest owned by the John Q. Hammons Revocable Trust in Atrium Hotels, L.P. (formerly known as the John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P.) as described in the exception to Representation and Warranty No. 6. In addition, the borrower sponsor is defendant in a lawsuit brought by a lender arising from a $275 million line of credit provided to the borrower sponsor by such lender as to the breach of the borrower sponsor’s net worth covenant. Approximately $110,000,000 has been drawn against such line of credit.
(16) Insurance	Hammons Hotel Portfolio (Loan No. 2) Hamilton Landing (Loan No. 4) Courtyard Sunnyvale (Loan No. 5) Dover Marketplace (Loan No. 19)	All policies may be issued by a syndicate of insurers through which at least 75% of the coverage (if there are 4 or fewer members of the syndicate) or at least 60% of the coverage (if there are 5 or more members of the syndicate) is with insurers having ratings of at least “A” by S&P and “A2” by Moody’s (or, if Moody’s does not rate such insurer, at least “A: VIII” by AM Best) (provided that the first layers of coverage are from insurers rated at least “A” by S&P and “A2” by Moody’s (or, if Moody’s does not rate such insurer, at least “A: VIII” by AM Best), and all such insurers shall have ratings of not less than “BBB+” by S&P and “Baa1” by Moody’s (or, if Moody’s does not rate such insurer, at least “A: VIII” by AM Best).
(16) Insurance	Pavilion Jenkintown (Loan No. 8)	All policies may be issued by a syndicate of insurers through which at least 75% of the coverage (if there are 4 or fewer members of the syndicate) or at least 60% of the coverage (if there are 5 or more members of the syndicate) is with insurers having ratings of at least “A” by S&P and “A2” by Moody’s (or, if Moody’s does not rate such insurer, at least “A: VIII” by AM Best) (provided that the first layers of coverage are from insurers rated at least “A” by S&P and “A2” by Moody’s (or, if Moody’s does not rate such insurer, at least “A: VIII” by AM Best), and all such insurers shall have ratings of not less than “BBB” by S&P and “Baa2” by Moody’s (or, if Moody’s does not rate such insurer, at least “A: VIII” by AM Best).
(16) Insurance	AkzoNobel Coatings (Loan No. 60)	The borrower may rely on the insurance provided by the AkzoNobel, Inc. tenant for its leased premises so long as such insurance is maintained in compliance with the terms of the applicable lease and satisfies the other requirements set forth in the related Mortgage Loan documents.

E-2-3

Representation Number on Annex E-1	Mortgaged Property Name and Mortgage Loan Number as Identified on Annex A	Description of Exception
(16) Insurance	4238 West Hundred Road (Loan No. 61)	The borrower may rely on the insurance provided by the Walgreens tenant for its leased premises so long as such insurance is maintained in compliance with the terms of the applicable lease and satisfies the other requirements set forth in the related Mortgage Loan documents.
(24) Local Law Compliance	Hilton Garden Inn Del Mar (Loan No. 28)	The Mortgaged Property is deficient by 8 parking spaces in violation of the planned development permits and site plans that were approved by the applicable governmental authority prior to construction of the Mortgaged Property.
(25) Licenses and Permits	AkzoNobel Coatings (Loan No. 60)	The final certificate of occupancy has not been issued for the leased premises to be occupied by AkzoNobel, Inc.
(30) Due-on-Sale or Encumbrance	Hammons Hotel Portfolio (Loan No. 2)	The Mortgage Loan documents permit the transfer of the related Mortgaged Properties to JD Holdings, L.L.C. in connection with the exercise of its right to purchase the Mortgaged Properties upon the redemption (or other disposition) of the preferred interest of the John Q. Hammons Revocable Trust in Atrium Hotels, L.P. (formerly known as the John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P.), which redemption or disposition is subject to litigation set forth in the exception to Representation and Warranty No. 13.
(31) Single-Purpose Entity	Hammons Hotel Portfolio (Loan No. 2)	The organizational documents for the Mortgagors identified as JQH-Concord Development, LLC, JQH-Glendale, AZ Development, LLC, Hammons of Huntsville, LLC and JQH-Murfreesboro Development, LLC do not provide that such Mortgagor is a Single-Purpose Entity.
(31) Single-Purpose Entity	Pavilion Jenkintown (Loan No. 8)	The Mortgagor previously owned a 90% equity interest in, and was the managing member of, The Daily Grind at the Pavilion, LLC, which is a tenant at the Mortgaged Property.
(34) Ground Leases	Hammons Hotel Portfolio (Loan No. 2)	(a) Neither the Ground Lease for the Mortgaged Property in Glendale, AZ nor the estoppel certificate obtained for the benefit of the Mortgagee at closing includes an express consent to the encumbrance of the lessee’s interest. (b), (h), (j) and (k) The Ground Lease for the Mortgaged Property in Glendale, Arizona does not include the restrictions set forth in these representations. (e) Neither the Ground Lease for the Mortgaged Property in Glendale, Arizona nor the estoppel certificate obtained for the benefit of the Mortgagee at closing includes an express consent to the assignment of the related Ground Lease to the holder of the Mortgage Loan. Any such assignment shall be subject to the consent of the lessor at the time of assignment. (g) In regards to the Ground Lease for the Mortgaged Property in Glendale, Arizona, the estoppel certificate entered for the benefit of lender entitles lender to any notice delivered to the applicable Mortgagor under the Ground Lease but does not include a limitation that no notice of default or termination is effective against the lender unless such notice is given to the lender. (l) The Ground Lease for the Mortgaged Property in Glendale, Arizona does not include a right to a new lease.
(39) Organization of Mortgagor	Hunters Pointe (Loan No. 59) Woodview Commons (Loan No. 64)	The Mortgagors under each of these Mortgage Loans are affiliates.

E-2-4

Representation Number on Annex E-1	Mortgaged Property Name and Mortgage Loan Number as Identified on Annex A	Description of Exception
(40) Environmental Conditions	4238 West Hundred Road (Loan No. 61)	The Phase I ESA for the related Mortgaged Property identified the levels of benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and total xylenes (“BTEX”) and 2-butanone, total xylenes, and methyl-tert-butyl ether (“MTBE”) detected in the soil of the Mortgaged Property to be a vapor encroachment concern and a recognized environmental condition. The Phase I ESA recommended further investigation, at an estimated cost of $5,250, which could result in the installation of a sub-slab depressurization system, at an estimated cost of $40,640 - $70,250.

E-2-5

Rialto Mortgage Finance, LLC

Representation Number on Annex E-1	Mortgaged Property Name and Mortgage Loan Number as Identified on Annex A	Description of Exception
(1) Whole Loan; Ownership of Mortgage Loans	Somerset Park Apartments (Loan No. 6)	The Mortgage Loan is evidenced by a $30,416,667 Note A-1-3 and a $6,083,333 Note A-2-3. The Mortgaged Property is also security for the pari passu Note A-1-1, which has an original principal balance of $61,250,000, Note A-2-1 which has an original principal of $12,250,000, Note A-1-2 which has an original principal balance of $58,333,333 and Note A-2-2 which has an original principal balance of $11,666,667. The Somerset Park Apartments Loan Combination is being serviced pursuant to the WFCM 2015-C30 Pooling and Servicing Agreement.
(5) Lien; Valid Assignment	Somerset Park Apartments (Loan No. 6)	The title policy contains exceptions relating to certain restrictions contained in three deeds that were recorded in 1938, 1940 and 1955 with respect to portions of the Mortgaged Property. Two of the deeds require that no more than one house be built on each parcel of land. The third deed requires that dwellings facing Crooks Road have not less than 1,060 square feet of floor space. Such restrictions are collectively referred to as the “Residential Restrictions.” Notwithstanding the Residential Restrictions, the Mortgaged Property is located in the Multiple-Family Residential District, and the apartment complex and golf course that are collateral for the Mortgage Loan were constructed in the early 1970’s in compliance with zoning requirements.. The related title policy contains an endorsement which insures against loss or damages suffered by reason of (1) the enforcement or attempted enforcement of the Residential Restrictions in favor of an adverse party, and (2) the release of a prospective purchaser or lessee of the title or the lender on the title from the obligation to purchase, lease or lend as a result of the Residential Restrictions, but only if there are contractual conditions requiring the delivery of marketable title.
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance	Somerset Park Apartments (Loan No. 6)	See exception to representation (5) above.
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance	Riverwalk Center (Loan No. 29)	The sole tenant at the Mortgaged Property has a right of first offer to purchase the Mortgaged Property in the event the borrower offers the Mortgaged Property for sale, which right does not apply to a foreclosure sale or a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure.
(17) Access; Utilities; Separate Tax Lots	Somerset Park Apartments (Loan No. 6)	A small and unimproved portion of the related Mortgaged Property (the “Orphan Parcel”), has not been and is not currently assessed for taxes. The Mortgagor is obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Orphan Parcel to be assessed for taxes, whether by causing the City of Troy to (i) create a new separate tax parcel for the Orphan Parcel, or (ii) incorporate the Orphan Parcel into the existing tax parcel. The Mortgagor and guarantor are liable for losses related to any failure to pay taxes with respect to the Orphan Parcel until such time that the Orphan Parcel assessment is completed and any taxes (including, interest and penalties) due and owing for the Orphan Parcel for the time period prior to the Orphan Parcel assessment are paid in full.
(24) Local Law Compliance	Somerset Park Apartments (Loan No. 6)	The portion of the Mortgaged Property that is used as a golf course is legal non-conforming. In the event the golf course is not used for 180 days or more, the Mortgagor would be required to obtain special approval to comply with zoning.
(24) Local Law Compliance	Cherry Creek  (Loan No. 51)	The portion of the Mortgaged Property that is used as a bank by Bank of America is legal nonconforming. In the event the bank is not used for 180 days or more, or of a casualty of greater than 50% of the replacement cost of the Mortgaged Property, the Mortgagor would be required to obtain special approval, in compliance with local zoning laws.

E-2-6

Representation Number on Annex E-1	Mortgaged Property Name and Mortgage Loan Number as Identified on Annex A	Description of Exception
(24) Local Law Compliance	Maximum Self Storage (Loan No. 54)	The portion of the Mortgaged Property that is used for office and retail is legal nonconforming. In the event of a casualty of 50% or more of the replacement cost of the Mortgaged Property, the Mortgagor would be required to rebuild the Mortgaged Property in conformity with zoning.
(31) Single-Purpose Entity	Waterway Shoppes II (Loan No. 21)	The Mortgagor previously owned property other than the Mortgaged Property, which was conveyed to a third party prior to the origination of the Mortgage Loan.
(39) Organization of Mortgagor	Hyatt Plantation (Loan No. 27) Hyatt John’s Creek (Loan No. 42) Hyatt Place Rogers (Loan No. 43)	The Mortgagors under each of the Mortgage Loans are affiliated entities.
(40) Environmental Conditions	Cherry Creek (Loan No. 51)	The Phase I environmental site assessment for the related Mortgaged Property identified a dry cleaner currently operating at the Mortgaged Property, which was characterized as a controlled environmental condition. In connection with the origination of the mortgage loan, the borrower has obtained an environmental impairment liability insurance policy from Lloyd’s of London (Beazley), in the amount of $2,000,000, with a 10 year, 30 day term and a deductible of $50,000.

E-2-7

KGS-Alpha Real Estate Capital Markets, LLC

Representation Number on Annex E-1	Mortgaged Property Name and Mortgage Loan Number as Identified on Annex A	Description of Exception
(34) Ground Leases	Westgate Plaza (Loan No. 37)	34(g): An estoppel received from the ground lessor requires the ground lessor to give the Mortgagee written notice of any default. However, neither such estoppel nor the Ground Lease provides that no notice of default or termination is effective against the Mortgagee unless such notice is given to the Mortgagee. 34(h): The Mortgagee is entitled to cure a default under the Ground Lease within 60 days of receiving notice of such default. 34(i): The Ground Lease requires the ground lessor’s consent (not to be unreasonably withheld) to subletting. The Loan Documents provide that the Mortgage will become fully recourse to the Mortgagor and the related guarantor if the Ground Lease is terminated, cancelled or otherwise ceases to exist.
(39) Organization of Mortgagor	Plaza El Toro (Loan No. 25) Westgate Plaza (Loan No. 37)	The Mortgagors are affiliated with each other.
(40) Environmental Conditions	Plaza El Toro (Loan No. 25)	The ESA noted the presence of several tetrachloroethene (“PCE”) drums at the Mortgaged Property relating to a tenant’s on-site dry cleaning operations, in connection with which the environmental consultant observed signs of leakage and staining near the bases of such drums, which lack secondary containment other than a mat, and the absence of an epoxy sealant to the floor. The ESA noted that the Mortgaged Property had previously undergone remedial activities to address soil contamination resulting from on-site dry cleaning activities, leading to the issuance of a case closure letter in 1998. The ESA concluded that based on the length of time since such remedial activities and the nature of dry cleaning chemicals, the presence of a dry cleaning business at the Mortgaged Property constitutes an Environmental Condition. The environmental consultant does not expect the costs of clean-up, if required, to exceed $1.2 million. The Mortgagor has obtained an environmental insurance policy from Steadfast Insurance Company in the amount of $2 million with a deductible in the amount of $100,000. The Loan Documents include a carve-out to the Mortgagor and the related guarantor for losses resulting from a failure to pay such deductible.
(40) Environmental Conditions	Westgate Plaza (Loan No. 37)	The ESA noted that a subsurface investigation conducted in 2006 identified PCE in soil at the Mortgaged Property relating to a tenant’s operation of a dry cleaning business. The related subsurface investigation report considered the PCE concentration de minimis and recommended no further investigation but that floors be sealed with epoxy. The ESA noted that floors do not appear to have been sealed with epoxy. The dry cleaning tenant has modified its operations to use a hydrocarbon-based solvent that does not contain PCE. The ESA concluded that based on the PCE contamination documented in 2006, the subsequent use of PCE until the dry cleaning tenant’s migration to a hydrocarbon-based solvent and the absence of an epoxy floor sealant, the historical use of PCE at the Mortgaged Property constitutes an Environmental Condition. The environmental consultant does not expect the costs of clean-up, if required, to exceed $1.2 million. The Mortgagor has obtained an environmental insurance policy from Steadfast Insurance Company in the amount of $2 million with a deductible in the amount of $50,000. The Loan Documents include a carve-out to the Mortgagor and the related guarantor for losses resulting from a failure to pay such deductible.

E-2-8

RAIT Funding, LLC

Representation Number on Annex E-1	Mortgaged Property Name and Mortgage Loan Number as Identified on Annex A	Description of Exception
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance	University Retail Portfolio (Loan No. 23)	The largest tenant, The Trustees of Indiana University (“Indiana University”), has a right of first refusal pursuant to its lease to purchase the Mortgaged Property if the Mortgagor receives a bona fide offer from a third party to purchase the Mortgaged Property that Mortgagor intends to accept (the “Indiana University ROFR”). Indiana University has entered into a subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreement in favor of the lender, providing, among other things, that the Indiana University ROFR does not apply to a foreclosure, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or any other enforcement action under the Mortgage Loan documents, nor does the Indiana University ROFR apply to the first subsequent transfer of the Mortgaged Property following such enforcement action.
(6) Permitted Liens; Title Insurance	Renaissance Faire I (Loan No. 46)	The second largest tenant, Weigel Broadcasting, has a right of first offer pursuant to its lease to purchase its leased premises at the Mortgaged Property if the Mortgagor intention to partition the Mortgaged Property into condominium units for sale to third parties. The related loan documents prohibit the related borrower from partitioning the Mortgaged Property or selling the Mortgaged Property without the lender’s consent (not to be unreasonably withheld in the case of a sale).

E-2-9

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

ANNEX F

CLASS A-AB SCHEDULED PRINCIPAL BALANCE SCHEDULE

Distribution Date	Balance	Distribution Date	Balance
10/10/2015	$72,484,000.00	9/10/2020	$71,590,196.34
11/10/2015	$72,484,000.00	10/10/2020	$70,503,158.37
12/10/2015	$72,484,000.00	11/10/2020	$69,505,469.73
1/10/2016	$72,484,000.00	12/10/2020	$68,410,270.87
2/10/2016	$72,484,000.00	1/10/2021	$67,404,116.15
3/10/2016	$72,484,000.00	2/10/2021	$66,393,892.45
4/10/2016	$72,484,000.00	3/10/2021	$65,100,374.31
5/10/2016	$72,484,000.00	4/10/2021	$64,080,826.31
6/10/2016	$72,484,000.00	5/10/2021	$62,964,387.24
7/10/2016	$72,484,000.00	6/10/2021	$61,851,787.69
8/10/2016	$72,484,000.00	7/10/2021	$60,634,831.91
9/10/2016	$72,484,000.00	8/10/2021	$59,512,897.09
10/10/2016	$72,484,000.00	9/10/2021	$58,386,467.38
11/10/2016	$72,484,000.00	10/10/2021	$57,156,073.66
12/10/2016	$72,484,000.00	11/10/2021	$56,020,198.83
1/10/2017	$72,484,000.00	12/10/2021	$54,780,627.83
2/10/2017	$72,484,000.00	1/10/2022	$53,635,232.84
3/10/2017	$72,484,000.00	2/10/2022	$52,485,248.43
4/10/2017	$72,484,000.00	3/10/2022	$51,034,591.73
5/10/2017	$72,484,000.00	4/10/2022	$49,874,179.30
6/10/2017	$72,484,000.00	5/10/2022	$48,610,766.54
7/10/2017	$72,484,000.00	6/10/2022	$47,440,638.97
8/10/2017	$72,484,000.00	7/10/2022	$46,167,786.56
9/10/2017	$72,484,000.00	8/10/2022	$44,987,866.65
10/10/2017	$72,484,000.00	9/10/2022	$43,803,218.18
11/10/2017	$72,484,000.00	10/10/2022	$42,516,256.68
12/10/2017	$72,484,000.00	11/10/2022	$41,321,700.50
1/10/2018	$72,484,000.00	12/10/2022	$40,025,112.25
2/10/2018	$72,484,000.00	1/10/2023	$38,820,569.63
3/10/2018	$72,484,000.00	2/10/2023	$37,611,199.22
4/10/2018	$72,484,000.00	3/10/2023	$36,106,687.36
5/10/2018	$72,484,000.00	4/10/2023	$34,886,432.51
6/10/2018	$72,484,000.00	5/10/2023	$33,564,874.31
7/10/2018	$72,484,000.00	6/10/2023	$32,334,428.76
8/10/2018	$72,484,000.00	7/10/2023	$31,002,968.84
9/10/2018	$72,484,000.00	8/10/2023	$29,762,251.59
10/10/2018	$72,484,000.00	9/10/2023	$28,516,560.71
11/10/2018	$72,484,000.00	10/10/2023	$27,170,287.78
12/10/2018	$72,484,000.00	11/10/2023	$25,914,204.04
1/10/2019	$72,484,000.00	12/10/2023	$24,557,832.95
2/10/2019	$72,484,000.00	1/10/2024	$23,291,273.73
3/10/2019	$72,484,000.00	2/10/2024	$22,019,636.71
4/10/2019	$72,484,000.00	3/10/2024	$20,553,405.34
5/10/2019	$72,484,000.00	4/10/2024	$19,270,787.22
6/10/2019	$72,484,000.00	5/10/2024	$17,888,634.16
7/10/2019	$72,484,000.00	6/10/2024	$16,595,329.62
8/10/2019	$72,484,000.00	7/10/2024	$15,202,793.16
9/10/2019	$72,484,000.00	8/10/2024	$13,898,717.25
10/10/2019	$72,484,000.00	9/10/2024	$12,589,412.25
11/10/2019	$72,484,000.00	10/10/2024	$11,181,329.06
12/10/2019	$72,484,000.00	11/10/2024	$9,861,125.49
1/10/2020	$72,484,000.00	12/10/2024	$8,442,452.76
2/10/2020	$72,484,000.00	1/10/2025	$7,111,263.96
3/10/2020	$72,484,000.00	2/10/2025	$5,774,736.74
4/10/2020	$72,484,000.00	3/10/2025	$4,154,910.50
5/10/2020	$72,484,000.00	4/10/2025	$2,806,521.21
6/10/2020	$72,484,000.00	5/10/2025	$1,360,461.95
7/10/2020	$72,484,000.00	6/10/2025	$863.28
8/10/2020	$72,483,815.90	7/10/2025	$0.00
		and thereafter

F-1

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

ANNEX G

GREYLYN BUSINESS PARK MORTGAGE LOAN AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE

Due Date	Beginning Balance ($)	Principal ($)	Interest ($)	Total Payment ($)	Ending Balance ($)
8/6/2015	35,625,000.00	-	148,507.76	148,507.76	35,625,000.00
9/6/2015	35,625,000.00	-	148,507.76	148,507.76	35,625,000.00
10/6/2015	35,625,000.00	-	143,717.19	143,717.19	35,625,000.00
11/6/2015	35,625,000.00	-	148,507.76	148,507.76	35,625,000.00
12/6/2015	35,625,000.00	-	143,717.19	143,717.19	35,625,000.00
1/6/2016	35,625,000.00	-	148,507.76	148,507.76	35,625,000.00
2/6/2016	35,625,000.00	-	148,507.76	148,507.76	35,625,000.00
3/6/2016	35,625,000.00	-	138,926.61	138,926.61	35,625,000.00
4/6/2016	35,625,000.00	-	148,507.76	148,507.76	35,625,000.00
5/6/2016	35,625,000.00	-	143,717.19	143,717.19	35,625,000.00
6/6/2016	35,625,000.00	-	148,507.76	148,507.76	35,625,000.00
7/6/2016	35,625,000.00	-	143,717.19	143,717.19	35,625,000.00
8/6/2016	35,625,000.00	-	148,507.76	148,507.76	35,625,000.00
9/6/2016	35,625,000.00	-	148,507.76	148,507.76	35,625,000.00
10/6/2016	35,625,000.00	-	143,717.19	143,717.19	35,625,000.00
11/6/2016	35,625,000.00	-	148,507.76	148,507.76	35,625,000.00
12/6/2016	35,625,000.00	-	143,717.19	143,717.19	35,625,000.00
1/6/2017	35,625,000.00	-	148,507.76	148,507.76	35,625,000.00
2/6/2017	35,625,000.00	-	148,507.76	148,507.76	35,625,000.00
3/6/2017	35,625,000.00	-	134,136.04	134,136.04	35,625,000.00
4/6/2017	35,625,000.00	-	148,507.76	148,507.76	35,625,000.00
5/6/2017	35,625,000.00	-	143,717.19	143,717.19	35,625,000.00
6/6/2017	35,625,000.00	-	148,507.76	148,507.76	35,625,000.00
7/6/2017	35,625,000.00	-	143,717.19	143,717.19	35,625,000.00
8/6/2017	35,625,000.00	31,263.72	148,507.76	179,771.48	35,593,736.28
9/6/2017	35,593,736.28	31,419.33	148,377.43	179,796.76	35,562,316.95
10/6/2017	35,562,316.95	37,285.44	143,464.31	180,749.75	35,525,031.51
11/6/2017	35,525,031.51	31,761.29	148,091.03	179,852.31	35,493,270.23
12/6/2017	35,493,270.23	37,618.01	143,185.77	180,803.78	35,455,652.21
1/6/2018	35,455,652.21	32,106.60	147,801.81	179,908.41	35,423,545.61
2/6/2018	35,423,545.61	32,266.40	147,667.97	179,934.37	35,391,279.21
3/6/2018	35,391,279.21	49,473.80	133,256.03	182,729.83	35,341,805.40
4/6/2018	35,341,805.40	32,673.24	147,327.22	180,000.47	35,309,132.16
5/6/2018	35,309,132.16	38,504.94	142,442.92	180,947.87	35,270,627.22
6/6/2018	35,270,627.22	33,027.51	147,030.51	180,058.02	35,237,599.70
7/6/2018	35,237,599.70	38,849.49	142,154.35	181,003.84	35,198,750.21

G-1

Due Date	Beginning Balance ($)	Principal ($)	Interest ($)	Total Payment ($)	Ending Balance ($)
8/6/2018	35,198,750.21	33,385.26	146,730.88	180,116.14	35,165,364.95
9/6/2018	35,165,364.95	33,551.43	146,591.71	180,143.14	35,131,813.52
10/6/2018	35,131,813.52	39,359.03	141,727.59	181,086.62	35,092,454.49
11/6/2018	35,092,454.49	33,914.32	146,287.77	180,202.09	35,058,540.18
12/6/2018	35,058,540.18	39,711.96	141,431.99	181,143.96	35,018,828.21
1/6/2019	35,018,828.21	34,280.77	145,980.85	180,261.62	34,984,547.44
2/6/2019	34,984,547.44	34,451.40	145,837.94	180,289.34	34,950,096.04
3/6/2019	34,950,096.04	51,457.16	131,594.88	183,052.04	34,898,638.88
4/6/2019	34,898,638.88	34,878.98	145,479.82	180,358.81	34,863,759.90
5/6/2019	34,863,759.90	40,650.15	140,646.22	181,296.37	34,823,109.74
6/6/2019	34,823,109.74	35,254.91	145,164.97	180,419.88	34,787,854.84
7/6/2019	34,787,854.84	41,015.76	140,340.00	181,355.77	34,746,839.07
8/6/2019	34,746,839.07	35,634.52	144,847.02	180,481.55	34,711,204.55
9/6/2019	34,711,204.55	35,811.88	144,698.48	180,510.36	34,675,392.66
10/6/2019	34,675,392.66	41,557.46	139,886.31	181,443.77	34,633,835.21
11/6/2019	34,633,835.21	36,196.97	144,375.95	180,572.92	34,597,638.24
12/6/2019	34,597,638.24	41,931.97	139,572.64	181,504.61	34,555,706.27
1/6/2020	34,555,706.27	36,585.83	144,050.26	180,636.10	34,519,120.43
2/6/2020	34,519,120.43	36,767.93	143,897.75	180,665.68	34,482,352.50
3/6/2020	34,482,352.50	48,023.60	134,470.64	182,494.24	34,434,328.90
4/6/2020	34,434,328.90	37,189.96	143,544.28	180,734.24	34,397,138.95
5/6/2020	34,397,138.95	42,897.71	138,763.79	181,661.50	34,354,241.24
6/6/2020	34,354,241.24	37,588.57	143,210.43	180,799.00	34,316,652.67
7/6/2020	34,316,652.67	43,285.39	138,439.10	181,724.48	34,273,367.28
8/6/2020	34,273,367.28	37,991.10	142,873.29	180,864.39	34,235,376.18
9/6/2020	34,235,376.18	38,180.19	142,714.92	180,895.11	34,197,195.99
10/6/2020	34,197,195.99	43,860.77	137,957.19	181,817.96	34,153,335.23
11/6/2020	34,153,335.23	38,588.52	142,372.92	180,961.45	34,114,746.70
12/6/2020	34,114,746.70	44,257.90	137,624.57	181,882.47	34,070,488.80
1/6/2021	34,070,488.80	39,000.87	142,027.56	181,028.43	34,031,487.93
2/6/2021	34,031,487.93	39,194.99	141,864.98	181,059.97	33,992,292.95
3/6/2021	33,992,292.95	55,763.02	127,988.54	183,751.56	33,936,529.92
4/6/2021	33,936,529.92	39,667.61	141,469.14	181,136.75	33,896,862.31
5/6/2021	33,896,862.31	45,307.38	136,745.59	182,052.97	33,851,554.93
6/6/2021	33,851,554.93	40,090.55	141,114.91	181,205.46	33,811,464.38
7/6/2021	33,811,464.38	45,718.71	136,401.08	182,119.79	33,765,745.67
8/6/2021	33,765,745.67	40,517.64	140,757.20	181,274.84	33,725,228.03
9/6/2021	33,725,228.03	40,719.31	140,588.30	181,307.61	33,684,508.72
10/6/2021	33,684,508.72	46,330.21	135,888.92	182,219.14	33,638,178.51

G-2

Due Date	Beginning Balance ($)	Principal ($)	Interest ($)	Total Payment ($)	Ending Balance ($)
11/6/2021	33,638,178.51	41,152.57	140,225.42	181,377.99	33,597,025.93
12/6/2021	33,597,025.93	46,751.59	135,536.00	182,287.59	33,550,274.35
1/6/2022	33,550,274.35	41,590.09	139,858.98	181,449.07	33,508,684.25
2/6/2022	33,508,684.25	41,797.10	139,685.60	181,482.70	33,466,887.16
3/6/2022	33,466,887.16	58,125.01	126,010.27	184,135.28	33,408,762.14
4/6/2022	33,408,762.14	42,294.43	139,269.07	181,563.50	33,366,467.71
5/6/2022	33,366,467.71	47,862.11	134,605.89	182,468.00	33,318,605.60
6/6/2022	33,318,605.60	42,743.16	138,893.24	181,636.39	33,275,862.44
7/6/2022	33,275,862.44	48,298.53	134,240.38	182,538.90	33,227,563.92
8/6/2022	33,227,563.92	43,196.29	138,513.72	181,710.01	33,184,367.62
9/6/2022	33,184,367.62	43,411.29	138,333.65	181,744.94	33,140,956.33
10/6/2022	33,140,956.33	48,948.32	133,696.14	182,644.47	33,092,008.01
11/6/2022	33,092,008.01	43,870.99	137,948.63	181,819.62	33,048,137.02
12/6/2022	33,048,137.02	49,395.40	133,321.69	182,717.10	32,998,741.62
1/6/2023	32,998,741.62	44,335.19	137,559.84	181,895.03	32,954,406.43
2/6/2023	32,954,406.43	44,555.86	137,375.02	181,930.88	32,909,850.57
3/6/2023	32,909,850.57	60,629.20	123,912.90	184,542.10	32,849,221.37
4/6/2023	32,849,221.37	45,079.39	136,936.54	182,015.93	32,804,141.98
5/6/2023	32,804,141.98	50,570.65	132,337.38	182,908.02	32,753,571.33
6/6/2023	32,753,571.33	45,555.46	136,537.81	182,093.27	32,708,015.87
7/6/2023	32,708,015.87	51,033.65	131,949.59	182,983.24	32,656,982.22
8/6/2023	32,656,982.22	46,036.21	136,135.17	182,171.37	32,610,946.01
9/6/2023	32,610,946.01	46,265.34	135,943.26	182,208.60	32,564,680.67
10/6/2023	32,564,680.67	51,724.05	131,371.35	183,095.40	32,512,956.62
11/6/2023	32,512,956.62	46,753.05	135,534.78	182,287.83	32,466,203.57
12/6/2023	32,466,203.57	52,198.38	130,974.08	183,172.46	32,414,005.19
1/6/2024	32,414,005.19	47,245.56	135,122.28	182,367.84	32,366,759.63
2/6/2024	32,366,759.63	47,480.71	134,925.33	182,406.04	32,319,278.92
3/6/2024	32,319,278.92	58,095.11	126,035.31	184,130.42	32,261,183.81
4/6/2024	32,261,183.81	48,006.18	134,485.23	182,491.41	32,213,177.63
5/6/2024	32,213,177.63	53,417.12	129,953.33	183,370.45	32,159,760.50
6/6/2024	32,159,760.50	48,510.99	134,062.43	182,573.42	32,111,249.52
7/6/2024	32,111,249.52	53,908.08	129,542.13	183,450.21	32,057,341.44
8/6/2024	32,057,341.44	49,020.75	133,635.48	182,656.23	32,008,320.69
9/6/2024	32,008,320.69	49,264.74	133,431.13	182,695.87	31,959,055.95
10/6/2024	31,959,055.95	54,641.14	128,928.16	183,569.30	31,904,414.80
11/6/2024	31,904,414.80	49,781.90	132,997.98	182,779.89	31,854,632.90
12/6/2024	31,854,632.90	55,144.11	128,506.90	183,651.01	31,799,488.79
1/6/2025	31,799,488.79	50,304.14	132,560.59	182,864.73	31,749,184.65

G-3

Due Date	Beginning Balance ($)	Principal ($)	Interest ($)	Total Payment ($)	Ending Balance ($)
2/6/2025	31,749,184.65	50,554.52	132,350.89	182,905.40	31,698,630.13
3/6/2025	31,698,630.13	66,074.31	119,352.39	185,426.70	31,632,555.82
4/6/2025	31,632,555.82	51,135.00	131,864.70	182,999.71	31,581,420.82
5/6/2025	31,581,420.82	56,460.09	127,404.72	183,864.80	31,524,960.73
6/6/2025	31,524,960.73	51,670.53	131,416.18	183,086.71	31,473,290.20
7/6/2025	31,473,290.20	31,473,290.20	126,968.50	31,600,258.70	-

G-4

PROSPECTUS

Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., the Depositor

Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Issuable in Series

We are Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., the depositor with respect to each series of certificates offered by this prospectus. We intend to offer from time to time mortgage pass-through certificates, issuable in series.  These offers may be made through one or more different methods, including offerings through underwriters.  We do not currently intend to list the offered certificates of any series on any national securities exchange or the NASDAQ stock market.  See “Method of Distribution.”

The Offered Certificates:   The offered certificates will be issuable in series. The issuing entity for each series of offered certificates will be a statutory or common law trust created at our direction.  Each series of offered certificates will—   ●             have its own series designation, and   ●             consist of one or more classes with various payment characteristics.   No governmental agency or instrumentality will insure or guarantee payment on the offered certificates.  The offered certificates will represent interests only in the issuing entity.  They will not represent interests in or obligations of us, any sponsor or any of our or their respective affiliates. Neither we nor any of our affiliates are responsible for making payments on the offered certificates if collections on the related trust assets are insufficient.   The Trust Assets:   The assets of each issuing entity will include—    ●            mortgage loans secured by first and/or junior liens on, or security interests in, various interests in commercial and multifamily real properties,   ●             mortgage-backed securities that directly or indirectly evidence interests in, or are directly or indirectly secured by, those types of mortgage loans, or   ●             some combination of those types of mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities.   Trust assets may also include cash, permitted investments, letters of credit, surety bonds, insurance policies, guarantees, reserve funds, guaranteed investment contracts, interest rate exchange agreements, interest rate cap or floor agreements and/or currency exchange agreements.  

In connection with each offering, we will prepare a supplement to this prospectus in order to describe in more detail the particular certificates being offered and the related trust assets. In that document, we will also state the price to the public for each class of offered certificates or explain the method for determining that price, identify the applicable lead or managing underwriter(s), if any, and provide information regarding the relevant underwriting arrangements and the underwriters’ compensation.  We will identify in each prospectus supplement the sponsor or sponsors for the subject securitization transaction.

Structural credit enhancement will be provided for the respective classes of offered certificates through overcollateralization, excess cash flow and/or the subordination of more junior classes of offered and/or  non-offered certificates, the use of a letter of credit, a surety bond, an insurance policy or a guarantee, the establishment of one or more reserve funds or any combination of the foregoing.  Payments on a class of offered certificates may occur monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, semi-annually or at any other specified interval, commencing on the distribution date specified in the related prospectus supplement.

You should carefully consider the risk factors beginning on page 19 in this prospectus, as well as those set forth in the related prospectus supplement, prior to investing.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the offered certificates or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus.  Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The date of this prospectus is January 16, 2015.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

	Page
IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS PROSPECTUS AND THE RELATED PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT	6
AVAILABLE INFORMATION	6
SUMMARY OF PROSPECTUS	7
RISK FACTORS	19
The Investment Performance of Your Offered Certificates Will Depend Upon Payments, Defaults and Losses on the Underlying Mortgage Loans; and Those Payments, Defaults and Losses May Be Highly Unpredictable	19
Repayment of a Commercial or Multifamily Mortgage Loan Depends Upon the Performance and Value of the Underlying Real Property, Which May Decline Over Time, and the Related Borrower’s Ability to Refinance the Property, of Which There Is No Assurance	23
The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered Certificates May Present Special Risks	29
Any Analysis of the Value or Income Producing Ability of a Commercial or Multifamily Property Is Highly Subjective and Subject to Error	51
Borrower Concentration Within a Trust Exposes Investors to Greater Risk of Default and Loss	53
Loan Concentration Within a Trust Exposes Investors to Greater Risk of Default and Loss	54
Geographic Concentration Within a Trust Exposes Investors to Greater Risk of Default and Loss	54
Changes in Pool Composition Will Change the Nature of Your Investment	54
The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks and/or Hinder Recovery	54
Borrower Bankruptcy Proceedings Can Delay and Impair Recovery on a Mortgage Loan Underlying Your Offered Certificates	56
Environmental Liabilities Will Adversely Affect the Value and Operation of the Contaminated Property and May Deter a Lender from Foreclosing	57
Lending on Condominium Units Creates Risks for Lenders That Are Not Present When Lending on Non-Condominiums	58
Lending on Ground Leases Creates Risks for Lenders That Are Not Present When Lending on an Actual Ownership Interest in a Real Property	59
Leased Fee Properties Have Special Risks	61
Some Provisions in the Mortgage Loans Underlying Your Offered Certificates May Be Challenged as Being Unenforceable	61
Jurisdictions With One Action or Security First Rules and/or Anti-Deficiency Legislation May Limit the Ability of the Special Servicer to Foreclose on a Real Property or to Realize on Obligations Secured by a Real Property	63
Additional Secured Debt Increases the Likelihood that a Borrower Will Default on a Mortgage Loan Underlying Your Offered Certificates; Co-Lender, Intercreditor and Similar Agreements May Limit a Mortgage Lender’s Rights	63
With Respect to Certain Mortgage Loans Included in Our Trusts, the Mortgaged Property or Properties that Secure the Subject Mortgage Loan in the Trust Also Secure One or More Related Mortgage Loans That Are Not in the Trust; The Interests of the Holders of Those Non-Trust Mortgage Loans May Conflict with Your Interests.	64
Certain Aspects of Co-Lender, Intercreditor and Similar Agreements Executed in Connection with Mortgage Loans Underlying Your Offered Certificates May be Unenforceable	65
Mezzanine Debt May Reduce the Cash Flow Available to Reinvest in a Mortgaged Real Property and may Increase the Likelihood that a Borrower Will Default on a Mortgage Loan Underlying Your Offered Certificates	65
World Events and Natural Disasters Could Have an Adverse Impact on the Real Properties Securing the Mortgage Loans Underlying Your Offered Certificates and Consequently Could Reduce the Cash Flow Available to Make Payments on the Offered Certificates.	66
Lack of Insurance Coverage Exposes a Trust to Risk for Particular Special Hazard Losses	66
Changes in Zoning Laws May Adversely Affect the Use or Value of a Real Property	67
Redevelopment and Renovation at the Mortgaged Properties May Have Uncertain and Adverse Results	67
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 May Be Expensive	67

-2-

Litigation and Other Legal Proceedings May Adversely Affect a Borrower’s Ability to Repay Its Mortgage Loan	68
Potential Conflicts of Interest Can Affect a Person’s Performance	68
Property Managers and Borrowers May Each Experience Conflicts of Interest in Managing Multiple Properties.	69
Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loans May Entail Greater Risks of Default to Lenders Than Fixed Rate Mortgage Loans	69
Limited Information Causes Uncertainty	69
The Risk of Terrorism in the United States and Military Action May Adversely Affect the Value of the Offered Certificates and Payments on the Mortgage Assets	69
Lack of Liquidity Will Impair Your Ability to Sell Your Offered Certificates and May Have an Adverse Effect on the Market Value of Your Offered Certificates	70
The Market Value of Your Offered Certificates May Be Adversely Affected by Factors Unrelated to the Performance of Your Offered Certificates and the Underlying Mortgage Assets, such as Fluctuations in Interest Rates and the Supply and Demand of CMBS Generally	70
The Credit Crisis and Downturn in the Real Estate Market Have Adversely Affected the Value of Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities	71
Certain Classes of the Offered Certificates are Subordinate to, and are Therefore Riskier than, One or More Other Classes of Certificates of the Same Series	72
Payments on the Offered Certificates Will Be Made Solely from the Limited Assets of the Related Trust, and Those Assets May Be Insufficient to Make All Required Payments on Those Certificates	72
Any Credit Support for Your Offered Certificates May Be Insufficient to Protect You Against All Potential Losses	72
The Interests of Certain Certificateholders With Rights and Powers Over Certain Servicing Actions and to Cure and Purchase Certain Mortgage Loans May Be in Conflict with the Interests of the Offered Certificateholders of the Same Series	73
Bankruptcy of a Servicer May Adversely Affect Collections on the Mortgage Loans and the Ability to Replace the Servicer	73
Additional Compensation to the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer and Interest on Advances Will Affect Your Right to Receive Distributions on Your Offered Certificates	74
Inability to Replace the Master Servicer Could Affect Collections and Recoveries on the Mortgage Assets	74
Problems with Book-Entry Registration	74
Taxes on Foreclosure Property Will Reduce Amounts Available to Make Payments on the Offered Certificates	74
Changes to REMIC Restrictions on Loan Modifications May Impact an Investment in the Certificates	75
Residual Interests in a Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit Have Adverse Tax Consequences	76
No Gross Up in Respect of the Certificates Held by Non-U.S. Persons	77
Certain Federal Tax Considerations Regarding Original Issue Discount	77
The Nature of Ratings Are Limited and Will Not Guarantee that You Will Receive Any Projected Return on Your Offered Certificates	77
The Ratings of Your Offered Certificates May Be Lowered or Withdrawn, or Your Certificates May Receive an Unsolicited Rating, Which May Adversely Affect the Liquidity, Market Value and Regulatory Characteristics of Your Offered Certificates	78
CAPITALIZED TERMS USED IN THIS PROSPECTUS	79
THE TRUST FUND	79
Description of the Trust Assets	79
Mortgage Loans	80
Mortgage-Backed Securities	84
Acquisition, Removal and Substitution of Mortgage Assets	85
Cash, Accounts and Permitted Investments	87
Credit Support	87
Arrangements Providing Reinvestment, Interest Rate and Currency Related Protection	88
TRANSACTION PARTICIPANTS	88
The Sponsor	88
The Depositor	89
The Issuing Entity	90
The Originators	90

-3-

DESCRIPTION OF THE GOVERNING DOCUMENTS	91
General	91
Assignment of Mortgage Assets	91
Representations and Warranties with Respect to Mortgage Assets	92
Collection and Other Servicing Procedures with Respect to Mortgage Loans	92
Servicing Mortgage Loans That Are Part of a Loan Combination	95
Sub-Servicers	95
Operating Advisor	96
Collection of Payments on Mortgage-Backed Securities	96
Advances	96
Matters Regarding the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Manager and Us	97
Fidelity Bonds and Errors and Omissions Insurance	99
Termination Events	99
Amendment	100
List of Certificateholders	100
Eligibility Requirements for the Trustee	100
Duties of the Trustee	101
Rights, Protections, Indemnities and Immunities of the Trustee	101
Resignation and Removal of the Trustee	102
DESCRIPTION OF THE CERTIFICATES	103
General	103
Investor Requirements and Transfer Restrictions	105
Payments on the Certificates	105
Allocation of Losses and Shortfalls	110
Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference; Reports Filed with the SEC	110
Reports to Certificateholders	111
Voting Rights	112
Termination and Redemption	112
Book-Entry Registration	113
Exchangeable Certificates	116
YIELD AND MATURITY CONSIDERATIONS	119
General	119
Pass-Through Rate	119
Payment Delays	119
Yield and Prepayment Considerations	119
Weighted Average Life and Maturity	122
Prepayment Models	122
Other Factors Affecting Yield, Weighted Average Life and Maturity	123
DESCRIPTION OF CREDIT SUPPORT	125
General	125
Subordinate Certificates	126
Overcollateralization and Excess Cash Flow	126
Letters of Credit	126
Insurance Policies, Surety Bonds and Guarantees	127
Reserve Funds	127
Credit Support with Respect to MBS	127
CERTAIN LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE MORTGAGE LOANS	127
General	128
Types of Mortgage Instruments	128
Installment Contracts	129
Leases and Rents	130
Personalty	130
Foreclosure	130
Bankruptcy Issues	135
Environmental Considerations	141

-4-

Due-on-Sale and Due-on-Encumbrance Provisions	144
Junior Liens; Rights of Holders of Senior Liens	144
Subordinate Financing	145
Default Interest and Limitations on Prepayments	145
Applicability of Usury Laws	145
Americans with Disabilities Act	146
Servicemembers Civil Relief Act	146
Anti-Money Laundering, Economic Sanctions and Bribery	147
Potential Forfeiture of Assets	147
MATERIAL FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES	148
General	148
REMICs	149
Taxation of Classes of Exchangeable Certificates	176
Grantor Trusts	179
Tax Return Disclosure and Investor List Requirements	190
STATE AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES	191
ERISA CONSIDERATIONS	191
General	191
Plan Asset Regulations	192
Prohibited Transaction Exemptions	193
Underwriter Exemption	193
Insurance Company General Accounts	194
Ineligible Purchasers	194
Consultation with Counsel	195
Tax Exempt Investors	195
LEGAL INVESTMENT	195
USE OF PROCEEDS	196
METHOD OF DISTRIBUTION	196
LEGAL MATTERS	198
FINANCIAL INFORMATION	198
RATINGS	198
GLOSSARY	200

-5-

IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS PROSPECTUS
AND THE RELATED PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT

We provide information about the offered certificates of a particular series in two separate documents that progressively provide more detail.  These documents are:

● this prospectus, which provides general information, some of which may not apply to that particular series of offered certificates; and

● the prospectus supplement for that particular series of offered certificates, which will describe the specific terms of those offered certificates.

When deciding whether to invest in any of the offered certificates, you should only rely on the information contained in this prospectus and the related prospectus supplement.  We have not authorized any dealer, salesman or other person to give any information or to make any representation that is different.  In addition, information in this prospectus or any related prospectus supplement is current only as of the date on its cover.  By delivery of this prospectus and any related prospectus supplement, we are not offering to sell any securities, and are not soliciting an offer to buy any securities, in any state where the offer and sale is not permitted.

We have included cross-references to captions in these materials under which you can find related discussions that we believe will enhance your understanding of the topic being discussed.  The table of contents of this prospectus and the table of contents included in the related prospectus supplement list the pages on which these captions are located.

In this prospectus, the term “you” refers to a prospective investor in offered certificates, and the terms “Depositor,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to the certificates offered by this prospectus.  The Securities Act registration statement number for that registration statement is 333-189017.  This prospectus is part of that registration statement, but the registration statement contains additional information.  Any materials, including our registration statement and the exhibits to it, that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission may be read and copied at prescribed rates at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.  The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.  The SEC maintains an internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, and that internet website is located at http://www.sec.gov.

-6-

SUMMARY OF PROSPECTUS
This summary contains selected information from this prospectus. It does not contain all of the information you need to consider in making your investment decision. To understand all of the terms of a particular offering of certificates, you should read carefully this prospectus and the related prospectus supplement in full.
The Depositor	We are Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., the depositor with respect to each series of offered certificates. We are a special purpose Delaware corporation. Our principal offices are located at 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013. Our main telephone number is 212-816-6000. We are an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. and an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. We will acquire the mortgage assets that are to back each series of offered certificates and transfer them to the issuing entity. See “Transaction Participants—The Depositor.”
The Sponsors	Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp., which is an affiliate of both us and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., will be a sponsor with respect to each securitization transaction involving the issuance of a series of offered certificates, unless otherwise specified in the prospectus supplement. If there are other sponsors with respect to any securitization transaction involving the issuance of a series of offered certificates, we will identify each of those sponsors and include relevant information with respect thereto in the related prospectus supplement. With respect to any securitization transaction involving the issuance of a series of offered certificates, a sponsor will be a person or entity that organizes and initiates that securitization transaction by selling or transferring assets, either directly or indirectly, including through an affiliate, to the issuing entity. See “Transaction Participants—The Sponsor.”
The Issuing Entity	The issuing entity with respect to each series of offered certificates will be a statutory trust or common law trust created at our direction. Each such trust will own and hold the related mortgage assets and be the entity in whose name the subject offered certificates are issued. See “Transaction Participants—The Issuing Entity.”
The Originators	Some or all of the mortgage loans backing a series of offered certificates may be originated by Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. or by one of our other affiliates. In addition, there may be other third-party originators of the mortgage loans backing a series of offered certificates. See “Transaction Participants—The Originators” and “Transaction Participants—The Sponsor.” We will identify in the prospectus supplement for each series of offered certificates any originator or group of affiliated originators — apart from a sponsor and/or its affiliates — that originated or is expected to originate mortgage loans

-7-

	representing 10% or more of the related mortgage asset pool, by balance.
The Securities Being Offered	The securities that will be offered by this prospectus and the related prospectus supplements consist of mortgage pass-through certificates. These certificates will be issued in series, and each series will, in turn, consist of one or more classes. Each class of offered certificates must, at the time of issuance, be assigned an investment grade rating by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. We will identify in the related prospectus supplement or in a related free writing prospectus, with respect to each class of offered certificates, each applicable rating agency and the minimum rating to be assigned. Typically, the four highest rating categories, within which there may be sub-categories or gradations to indicate relative standing, signify investment grade. See “Ratings.”
	Each series of offered certificates will evidence beneficial ownership interests in a trust established by us and containing the assets described in this prospectus and the related prospectus supplement.
The Offered Certificates May Be
Issued with Other Certificates	We may not publicly offer all the mortgage pass-through certificates evidencing interests in one of our trusts. We may elect to retain some of those certificates, to place some privately with institutional investors, to place some with investors outside the United States or to deliver some to the applicable seller as partial consideration for the related mortgage assets. In addition, some of those certificates may not satisfy the rating requirement for offered certificates described under “—The Securities Being Offered” above.
The Governing Documents	In general, a pooling and servicing agreement or other similar agreement or collection of agreements will govern, among other things—
	●	the issuance of each series of offered certificates,
	●	the creation of and transfer of assets to the issuing entity, and
	●	the servicing and administration of those assets.
	The parties to the governing document(s) for a series of offered certificates will always include us and a trustee. We will be responsible for establishing the issuing entity for each series of offered certificates. In addition, we will transfer or arrange for the transfer of the initial trust assets to each issuing entity. In general, the trustee for a series of offered certificates will be responsible for, among other things, making payments and

-8-

preparing and disseminating various reports to the holders of those offered certificates.
If the trust assets for a series of offered certificates include mortgage loans, the parties to the applicable governing document(s) will also include—
●	one or more master servicers that will generally be responsible for performing customary servicing duties with respect to those mortgage loans that are not defaulted, nonperforming or otherwise problematic in any material respect, and
●	one or more special servicers that will generally be responsible for servicing and administering (a) those mortgage loans that are defaulted, nonperforming or otherwise problematic in any material respect, including the performance of work-outs and foreclosures with respect to those mortgage loans, and (b) real estate assets acquired as part of the related trust with respect to defaulted mortgage loans.
The same person or entity, or affiliated entities, may act as both master servicer and special servicer for one of our trusts.
If the trust assets for a series of offered certificates include mortgage-backed securities, the parties to the applicable governing document(s) may also include a manager that will be responsible for performing various administrative duties with respect to those mortgage-backed securities. If the related trustee assumes those duties, however, there will be no manager.
Compensation arrangements for a trustee, master servicer, special servicer or manager for one of our trusts may vary from securitization transaction to securitization transaction.
In the related prospectus supplement, we will identify the trustee and any master servicer, special servicer or manager for each series of offered certificates and will describe their respective duties and compensation in further detail. In addition, in the related prospectus supplement, we will also identify any other material servicer responsible for making distributions to holders of a series of offered certificates, performing workouts or foreclosures, or other aspects of the servicing of a series of offered certificates or the related underlying mortgage assets upon which the performance of those offered certificates or underlying mortgage assets is materially dependent, and we will describe that servicer’s duties and compensation in further detail. See “Description of the Governing Documents.”
Any servicer, master servicer or special servicer for one of our trusts may perform any or all of its servicing duties under the

-9-

	applicable governing document(s) through one or more sub-servicers. In the related prospectus supplement, we will identify any such sub-servicer that, at the time of initial issuance of the subject offered certificates, is (a) affiliated with us or with the issuing entity or any sponsor for the subject securitization transaction or (b) services 10% or more of the related mortgage assets, by balance.
Characteristics of the Mortgage Assets	The trust assets with respect to any series of offered certificates will, in general, include mortgage loans. Each of those mortgage loans will constitute the obligation of one or more persons to repay a debt. The performance of that obligation will be secured by a first or junior lien on, or security interest in, the fee, leasehold or other interest(s) of the related borrower or another person in or with respect to one or more commercial or multifamily real properties. In particular, those properties may include:
	●	rental or cooperatively-owned buildings with multiple dwelling units;
	●	retail properties related to the sale of consumer goods and other products, or related to providing entertainment, recreational or personal services, to the general public;
	●	office buildings;
	●	hospitality properties;
	●	casino properties;
	●	health care-related facilities;
	●	industrial facilities;
	●	warehouse facilities, mini-warehouse facilities and self-storage facilities;
	●	restaurants, taverns and other establishments involved in the food and beverage industry;
	●	manufactured housing communities, mobile home parks and recreational vehicle parks;
	●	recreational and resort properties;
	●	arenas and stadiums;
	●	churches and other religious facilities;
	●	parking lots and garages;

-10-

●	mixed use properties;
●	other income-producing properties; and/or
●	unimproved land.
The mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may have a variety of payment terms. For example, any of those mortgage loans—
●	may provide for the accrual of interest at a mortgage interest rate that is fixed over its term, that resets on one or more specified dates or that otherwise adjusts from time to time;
●	may provide for the accrual of interest at a mortgage interest rate that may be converted at the borrower’s election from an adjustable to a fixed interest rate or from a fixed to an adjustable interest rate;
●	may provide for no accrual of interest;
●	may provide for level payments to stated maturity, for payments that reset in amount on one or more specified dates or for payments that otherwise adjust from time to time to accommodate changes in the mortgage interest rate or to reflect the occurrence of specified events;
●	may be fully amortizing or, alternatively, may be partially amortizing or nonamortizing, with a substantial payment of principal due on its stated maturity date;
●	may permit the negative amortization or deferral of accrued interest;
●	may prohibit some or all voluntary prepayments or require payment of a premium, fee or charge in connection with those prepayments;
●	may permit defeasance and the release of real property collateral in connection with that defeasance;
●	may provide for payments of principal, interest or both, on due dates that occur monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, semi-annually, annually or at some other interval; and/or
●	may have two or more component parts, each having characteristics that are otherwise described in this prospectus as being attributable to separate and distinct mortgage loans.

-11-

Most, if not all, of the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates will be secured by liens on real properties located in the United States, its territories and possessions. However, some of those mortgage loans may be secured by liens on real properties located outside the United States, its territories and possessions, provided that foreign mortgage loans do not represent more than 10% of the related mortgage asset pool, by balance.
Neither we nor any of our affiliates will guarantee or insure repayment of any of the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates. Unless we expressly state otherwise in the related prospectus supplement, no governmental agency or instrumentality will guarantee or insure repayment of any of the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates.
The trust assets with respect to any series of offered certificates may also include mortgage participations, mortgage pass-through certificates, collateralized mortgage obligations and other mortgage-backed securities, that evidence an interest in, or are secured by a pledge of, one or more mortgage loans of the type described above. We will not include a mortgage participation, mortgage pass-through certificate, collateralized mortgage obligation or other mortgage-backed security among the trust assets with respect to any series of offered certificates unless—
●	the security has been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
●	we would be free to publicly resell the security without registration.
In addition to the asset classes described above in this “—Characteristics of the Mortgage Assets” subsection, we may include in the trust with respect to any series of offered certificates other asset classes, provided that such other asset classes in the aggregate will not exceed 10% by principal balance of the related asset pool.
We will describe the specific characteristics of the mortgage assets underlying a series of offered certificates in the related prospectus supplement.
The trust assets with respect to a series of offered certificates will also include cash, including in the form of initial deposits and collections on the related mortgage assets and other related trust assets, bank accounts, permitted investments and, following foreclosure, acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or any other enforcement action, real property and other collateral for defaulted mortgage loans.
See “The Trust Fund.”

-12-

Acquisition, Removal and
Substitution of Mortgage Assets	We will generally acquire the mortgage assets to be included in our trusts from Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. or another of our affiliates or from another seller of commercial and multifamily mortgage loans. We will then transfer those mortgage assets to the issuing entity for the related securitization.
	In general, the total outstanding principal balance of the mortgage assets transferred by us to any particular trust will equal or exceed the initial total outstanding principal balance of the related series of certificates. If the total outstanding principal balance of the related mortgage assets initially delivered by us to the related trustee is less than the initial total outstanding principal balance of any series of certificates, and if the subject securitization transaction contemplates a prefunding period, then we will deposit or arrange for the deposit of cash or liquid investments on an interim basis with the related trustee or such other party as is specified in the related prospectus supplement to cover the shortfall, and we will specify in the related prospectus supplement the amount of, and the percentage of the mortgage asset pool represented by, that deposit. For 90 days — or such other period as may be specified in the related prospectus supplement — following the date of initial issuance of that series of certificates, which 90-day or other period will be the prefunding period, we or such other party as is specified in the related prospectus supplement will be entitled to obtain a release of the deposited cash or investments upon delivery of a corresponding amount of mortgage assets. However, if there is a failure by us or any other applicable party to deliver mortgage assets sufficient to make up the entire shortfall by the end of the prefunding period, any of the cash or, following liquidation, investments remaining on deposit with the related trustee or other applicable party will be used to pay down the total principal balance of the related series of certificates or otherwise as described in the related prospectus supplement. If the subject securitization transaction contemplates a prefunding period, we will disclose in the related prospectus supplement any limitation on the ability to add pool assets and the requirements for mortgage assets that may be added to the related mortgage asset pool.
	If so specified in the related prospectus supplement, we or another specified person or entity may be permitted, at our or its option, but subject to the conditions specified in that prospectus supplement, to acquire from the related trust particular mortgage assets underlying a series of certificates in exchange for:
	●	cash that would be applied to pay down the principal balances of certificates of that series; and/or

-13-

	●	other mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities that—
		1.	conform to the description of mortgage assets in this prospectus, and
		2.	satisfy the criteria set forth in the related prospectus supplement.
	In addition, if so specified in the related prospectus supplement, a special servicer or other specified party for one of our trusts may be obligated, under the circumstances described in that prospectus supplement, to sell on behalf of the trust a delinquent or defaulted mortgage asset.
	Further, if so specified under circumstances described in the related prospectus supplement, all or substantially all of the remaining certificateholders of a given series of certificates, acting together, may exchange those certificates for all of the mortgage loans, REO properties and mortgage-backed securities remaining in the mortgage pool underlying those certificates.
	If and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, we, a mortgage asset seller and/or another specified person or entity may make or assign to or for the benefit of one of our trusts various representations and warranties, or may be obligated to deliver to one of our trusts various documents, in either case relating to some or all of the mortgage assets transferred to that trust. Upon the discovery of a material breach of any such representation or warranty or a material defect with respect to those documents, in each case that is material and adverse in accordance with a standard set forth in the related prospectus supplement, we or such other party may be required, at our or its option, to either repurchase the affected mortgage asset(s) out of the related trust or to replace the affected mortgage asset(s) with other mortgage asset(s) that satisfy the criteria set forth in the related prospectus supplement.
	No replacement of mortgage assets or acquisition of new mortgage assets will be permitted if it would result in a qualification, downgrade or withdrawal of the then-current rating assigned by any rating agency to any class of affected offered certificates.
Characteristics of
the Offered Certificates	As more particularly described under “Description of the Certificates—General” and “—Payments on the Certificates,” an offered certificate may entitle the holder to receive:
	●	payments of interest;
	●	payments of principal;

-14-

	●	payments of all or part of the prepayment or repayment premiums, fees and charges, equity participation payments or any other specific items or amounts received on the related mortgage assets; and/or
	●	payments of residual amounts remaining after required payments have been made with respect to other classes of certificates of the same series.
	Any class of offered certificates may be senior or subordinate to or pari passu with one or more other classes of certificates of the same series, including a non-offered class of certificates of that series, for purposes of some or all payments and/or allocations of losses.
	A class of offered certificates may have two or more component parts, each having characteristics that are otherwise described in this prospectus as being attributable to separate and distinct classes.
	Payments on a class of offered certificates may occur monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, semi-annually or at any other specified interval, commencing on the distribution date specified in the related prospectus supplement.
	We will describe the specific characteristics of each class of offered certificates in the related prospectus supplement, including the principal balance or notional amount, pass-through rate, payment characteristics and authorized denominations. Among other things, in the related prospectus supplement, we will summarize the flow of funds, payment priorities and allocations among the respective classes of offered certificates of any particular series, the respective classes of non-offered certificates of that series, and fees and expenses, to the extent necessary to understand the payment characteristics of those classes of offered certificates, and we will identify any events in the applicable governing document(s) that would alter the transaction structure or flow of funds.
	If the related prospectus supplement so provides, a series of certificates may include one or more classes that are “exchangeable certificates” as described under “Description of the Certificates-Exchangeable Certificates.”
	See “Description of the Certificates.”
Credit Support and Reinvestment,
Interest Rate and Currency Related
Protection for the Offered Certificates	Some classes of offered certificates may be protected in full or in part against defaults and losses, or select types of defaults and losses, on the related mortgage assets by overcollateralization and/or excess cash flow or through the subordination of one or

-15-

	more other classes of certificates of the same series or by other types of credit support. The other types of credit support may include a letter of credit, a surety bond, an insurance policy, a guarantee or a reserve fund. We will describe the credit support, if any, for each class of offered certificates and, if applicable, we will identify the provider of that credit support, in the related prospectus supplement. In addition, we will summarize in the related prospectus supplement how losses not covered by credit enhancement or support will be allocated to the subject series of offered certificates.
	The trust assets with respect to any series of offered certificates may also include any of the following agreements:
	●	guaranteed investment contracts in accordance with which moneys held in the funds and accounts established with respect to those offered certificates will be invested at a specified rate;
	●	interest rate exchange agreements, interest rate cap agreements and interest rate floor agreements; and
	●	currency exchange agreements.
	We will describe the types of reinvestment, interest rate and currency related protection, if any, for each class of offered certificates and, if applicable, we will identify the provider of that protection, in the related prospectus supplement.
	See “Risk Factors,” “The Trust Fund” and “Description of Credit Support.”
Advances with Respect
to the Mortgage Assets	If the trust assets for a series of offered certificates include mortgage loans, then, as and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, the related master servicer, the related special servicer, the related trustee, any related provider of credit support and/or any other specified person may be obligated to make, or may have the option of making, advances with respect to those mortgage loans to cover—
	●	delinquent scheduled payments of principal and/or interest, other than balloon payments,
	●	property protection expenses,
	●	other servicing expenses, or
	●	any other items specified in the related prospectus supplement.

-16-

	Any party making advances will be entitled to reimbursement from subsequent recoveries on the related mortgage loan and as otherwise described in this prospectus or the related prospectus supplement. That party may also be entitled to receive interest on its advances for a specified period. See “Description of the Governing Documents—Advances.”
	If the trust assets for a series of offered certificates include mortgage-backed securities, we will describe in the related prospectus supplement any comparable advancing obligations with respect to those mortgage-backed securities or the underlying mortgage loans.
Optional or Mandatory
Redemption or Termination	We will describe in the related prospectus supplement any circumstances in which a specified party is permitted or obligated to purchase or sell any of the mortgage assets underlying a series of offered certificates. In particular, a master servicer, special servicer or other designated party may be permitted or obligated to purchase or sell—
	●	all the mortgage assets in any particular trust, thereby resulting in a termination of the trust, or
	●	that portion of the mortgage assets in any particular trust as is necessary or sufficient to retire one or more classes of offered certificates of the related series.
	See “Description of the Certificates—Termination and Redemption.”
Federal Income Tax Consequences	Any class of offered certificates will constitute or evidence ownership of:
	●	regular interests or residual interests in a real estate mortgage investment conduit under Sections 860A through 860G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; or
	●	interests in a grantor trust under Subpart E of Part I of Subchapter J of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
	See “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences.”
ERISA Considerations	If you are a fiduciary or any other person investing assets of an employee benefit plan or other retirement plan or arrangement, you are encouraged to review with your legal advisor whether the purchase or holding of offered certificates could give rise to a transaction that is prohibited under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or the Internal

-17-

	Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. See “ERISA Considerations.”
Legal Investment	We will specify in the related prospectus supplement which classes of the offered certificates, if any, will constitute mortgage related securities for purposes of the Secondary Mortgage Market Enhancement Act of 1984, as amended. If your investment activities are subject to legal investment laws and regulations, regulatory capital requirements, or review by regulatory authorities, then you may be subject to restrictions on investment in the offered certificates. You are encouraged to consult your own legal advisors to determine the suitability of and consequences to you of the purchase, ownership and sale of the offered certificates. See “Legal Investment.”
Ratings	It is a condition to the issuance of any class of offered certificates that, at the time of issuance, at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization has rated those certificates in one of its generic rating categories which signifies investment grade. Typically, the four highest rating categories, within which there may be sub-categories or gradations indicating relative standing, signify investment grade. We will, in the related prospectus supplement or in a related free writing prospectus, with respect to each class of offered certificates, identify the applicable rating agency or agencies and specify the minimum rating(s) that must be assigned thereto. See “Ratings.”

-18-

RISK FACTORS

You should consider the following factors, as well as the factors set forth under “Risk Factors” in the related prospectus supplement, in deciding whether to purchase offered certificates.

The Investment Performance of Your Offered Certificates Will Depend Upon Payments, Defaults and Losses on the Underlying Mortgage Loans; and Those Payments, Defaults and Losses May Be Highly Unpredictable

The Terms of the Underlying Mortgage Loans Will Affect Payments on Your Offered Certificates.  Each of the mortgage loans underlying the offered certificates will specify the terms on which the related borrower must repay the outstanding principal amount of the loan.  The rate, timing and amount of scheduled payments of principal may vary, and may vary significantly, from mortgage loan to mortgage loan.  The rate at which the underlying mortgage loans amortize will directly affect the rate at which the principal balance or notional amount of your offered certificates is paid down or otherwise reduced.

In addition, any mortgage loan underlying the offered certificates may permit the related borrower during some or all of the loan term to prepay the loan.  In general, a borrower will be more likely to prepay its mortgage loan when it has an economic incentive to do so, such as obtaining a larger loan on the same underlying real property or a lower or otherwise more advantageous interest rate through refinancing.  If a mortgage loan includes some form of prepayment restriction, the likelihood of prepayment should decline.  These restrictions may include—

● an absolute or partial prohibition against voluntary prepayments during some or all of the loan term, or

● a requirement that voluntary prepayments be accompanied by some form of prepayment premium, fee or charge during some or all of the loan term.

In many cases, however, there will be no restriction associated with the application of insurance proceeds or condemnation proceeds as a prepayment of principal.

The Terms of the Underlying Mortgage Loans Do Not Provide Absolute Certainty as Regards the Rate, Timing and Amount of Payments on Your Offered Certificates.  Notwithstanding the terms of the mortgage loans backing your offered certificates, the amount, rate and timing of payments and other collections on those mortgage loans will, to some degree, be unpredictable because of borrower defaults and because of casualties and condemnations with respect to the underlying real properties.

The investment performance of your offered certificates may vary materially and adversely from your expectations due to—

● the rate of prepayments and other unscheduled collections of principal on the underlying mortgage loans being faster or slower than you anticipated, or

● the rate of defaults on the underlying mortgage loans being faster, or the severity of losses on the underlying mortgage loans being greater, than you anticipated.

The actual yield to you, as a holder of an offered certificate, may not equal the yield you anticipated at the time of your purchase, and the total return on investment that you expected may not be realized.  In deciding whether to purchase any offered certificates, you should make an independent decision as to the appropriate prepayment, default and loss assumptions to be used.  If the trust assets underlying your offered certificates

19

include mortgage-backed securities, the terms of those securities may soften or enhance the effects to you that may result from prepayments, defaults and losses on the mortgage loans that ultimately back those securities.

Prepayments on the Underlying Mortgage Loans Will Affect the Average Life of Your Offered Certificates; and the Rate and Timing of Those Prepayments May Be Highly Unpredictable.  Payments of principal and/or interest on your offered certificates will depend upon, among other things, the rate and timing of payments on the related mortgage assets.  Prepayments on the underlying mortgage loans may result in a faster rate of principal payments on your offered certificates, thereby resulting in a shorter average life for your offered certificates than if those prepayments had not occurred.  The rate and timing of principal prepayments on pools of mortgage loans varies among pools and is influenced by a variety of economic, demographic, geographic, social, tax and legal factors.  Accordingly, neither you nor we can predict the rate and timing of principal prepayments on the mortgage loans underlying your offered certificates.  As a result, repayment of your offered certificates could occur significantly earlier or later, and the average life of your offered certificates could be significantly shorter or longer, than you expected.

The extent to which prepayments on the underlying mortgage loans ultimately affect the average life of your offered certificates depends on the terms and provisions of your offered certificates.  A class of offered certificates may entitle the holders to a pro rata share of any prepayments on the underlying mortgage loans, to all or a disproportionately large share of those prepayments, or to none or a disproportionately small share of those prepayments.  If you are entitled to a disproportionately large share of any prepayments on the underlying mortgage loans, your offered certificates may be retired at an earlier date.  If, however, you are only entitled to a small share of the prepayments on the underlying mortgage loans, the average life of your offered certificates may be extended.  Your entitlement to receive payments, including prepayments, of principal of the underlying mortgage loans may—

● vary based on the occurrence of specified events, such as the retirement of one or more other classes of certificates of the same series, or

● be subject to various contingencies, such as prepayment and default rates with respect to the underlying mortgage loans.

We will describe the terms and provisions of your offered certificates more fully in the related prospectus supplement.

Prepayments on the Underlying Mortgage Loans Will Affect the Yield on Your Offered Certificates; and the Rate and Timing of Those Prepayments May Be Highly Unpredictable.  If you purchase your offered certificates at a discount or premium, the yield on your offered certificates will be sensitive to prepayments on the underlying mortgage loans.  If you purchase your offered certificates at a discount, you should consider the risk that a slower than anticipated rate of principal payments on the underlying mortgage loans could result in your actual yield being lower than your anticipated yield.  Alternatively, if you purchase your offered certificates at a premium, you should consider the risk that a faster than anticipated rate of principal payments on the underlying mortgage loans could result in your actual yield being lower than your anticipated yield.  The potential effect that prepayments may have on the yield of your offered certificates will increase as the discount deepens or the premium increases.  If the amount of interest payable on your offered certificates is disproportionately large as compared to the amount of principal payable on your offered certificates, or if your offered certificates entitle you to receive payments of interest but no payments of principal, then you may fail to recover your original investment under some prepayment scenarios.  The rate and timing of principal prepayments on pools of mortgage loans varies among pools and is influenced by a variety of economic, demographic, geographic, social, tax and legal factors.  Accordingly, neither you nor we can predict the rate and timing of principal prepayments on the mortgage loans underlying your offered certificates.

20

Delinquencies, Defaults and Losses on the Underlying Mortgage Loans May Affect the Amount and Timing of Payments on Your Offered Certificates; and the Rate and Timing of Those Delinquencies and Defaults, and the Severity of Those Losses, Are Highly Unpredictable.  The rate and timing of delinquencies and defaults, and the severity of losses, on the underlying mortgage loans will impact the amount and timing of payments on a series of offered certificates to the extent that their effects are not offset by delinquency advances or some form of credit support.

Unless otherwise covered by delinquency advances or some form of credit support, defaults on the underlying mortgage loans may delay payments on a series of offered certificates while the defaulted mortgage loans are worked-out or liquidated.  However, liquidations of defaulted mortgage loans prior to maturity could affect the yield and average life of an offered certificate in a manner similar to a voluntary prepayment.

If you calculate your anticipated yield to maturity based on an assumed rate of default and amount of losses on the underlying mortgage loans that is lower than the default rate and amount of losses actually experienced, then, to the extent that you are required to bear the additional losses, your actual yield to maturity will be lower than you calculated and could, under some scenarios, be negative.  Furthermore, the timing of losses on the underlying mortgage loans can affect your yield.  In general, the earlier you bear any loss on an underlying mortgage loan, the greater the negative effect on your yield.

See “—Repayment of a Commercial or Multifamily Mortgage Loan Depends Upon the Performance and Value of the Underlying Real Property, Which May Decline Over Time, and the Related Borrower’s Ability to Refinance the Property, of Which There Is No Assurance” below.

There Is an Increased Risk of Default Associated with Balloon Payments.  Any of the mortgage loans underlying your offered certificates may be nonamortizing or only partially amortizing.  The borrower under a mortgage loan of that type is required to make substantial payments of principal and interest, which are commonly called balloon payments, on the maturity date of the loan.  The ability of the borrower to make a balloon payment depends upon the borrower’s ability to refinance or sell the real property securing the loan.  The ability of the borrower to refinance or sell the property will be affected by a number of factors, including:

● the fair market value and condition of the underlying real property;

● the level of interest rates;

● the borrower’s equity in the underlying real property;

● the borrower’s financial condition;

● occupancy levels at or near the time of refinancing;

● the operating history of the underlying real property;

● changes in zoning and tax laws;

● changes in competition in the relevant area;

● changes in rental rates in the relevant area;

● changes in governmental regulation and fiscal policy;

● prevailing general and regional economic conditions;

21

● the state of the fixed income and mortgage markets; and

● the availability of credit for multifamily rental or commercial properties.

See “—Repayment of a Commercial or Multifamily Mortgage Loan Depends Upon the Performance and Value of the Underlying Real Property, Which May Decline Over Time, and the Related Borrower’s Ability to Refinance the Property, of Which There Is No Assurance” below.

Neither we nor any of our affiliates will be obligated to refinance any mortgage loan underlying your offered certificates.

Modifications of the Terms of the Mortgage Loans May Affect the Amount and Timing of Payments on Your Offered Certificates.  The related master servicer or special servicer may, within prescribed limits, extend and modify mortgage loans underlying your offered certificates that are in default or as to which a payment default is imminent in order to maximize recoveries on the defaulted loans.  The related master servicer or special servicer is only required to determine that any extension or modification is reasonably likely to produce a greater recovery than a liquidation of the real property securing the defaulted loan.  There is a risk that the decision of the master servicer or special servicer to extend or modify a mortgage loan may not in fact produce a greater recovery.

The related master servicer (or any related primary servicer) will be responsible for servicing the mortgage loans underlying your offered certificates regardless of whether such mortgage loans are performing or have become delinquent or have otherwise been transferred to special servicing.  As delinquencies or defaults occur, the special servicer and any sub-servicer will be required to utilize an increasing amount of resources to work with borrowers to maximize collections on the mortgage loans serviced by it.  This may include modifying the terms of such mortgage loans that are in default or whose default is reasonably foreseeable.  At each step in the process of trying to bring a defaulted mortgage loan current or in maximizing proceeds to the certificateholders, the special servicer and any sub-servicer will be required to invest time and resources not otherwise required when collecting payments on performing mortgage loans.  Modifications of mortgage loans implemented by the special servicer or any sub-servicer in order to maximize ultimate proceeds of such mortgage loans to the certificateholders may have the effect of, among other things, reducing or otherwise changing the mortgage rate, forgiving or forbearing payments of principal, interest or other amounts owed under the mortgage loan, extending the final maturity date of the mortgage loan, capitalizing or deferring delinquent interest and other amounts owed under the mortgage loan, forbearing payment of a portion of the principal balance of the mortgage loan or any combination of these or other modifications. Any modified mortgage loan may remain in the related trust, and the modification may result in a reduction in (or may eliminate) the funds received by the trust with respect to such mortgage loan.

The ability to modify mortgage loans by the applicable servicer may be limited by several factors.  First, if the servicer has to consider a large number of modifications, operational constraints may affect the ability of the servicer to adequately address all of the needs of the borrowers.  Furthermore, the terms of the governing document related to your offered certificates may prohibit the servicer from taking certain actions in connection with a loan modification, such as an extension of the loan term beyond a specified date such as a specified number of years prior to the rated final distribution date. You should consider the importance of the role of the servicer in maximizing collections for the transaction and the impediments the servicer may encounter when servicing delinquent or defaulted mortgage loans.  In some cases, failure by a servicer to timely modify the terms of a defaulted mortgage loan may reduce amounts available for distribution on your offered certificates.  In addition, even if a loan modification is successfully completed, there can be no assurance that the related borrower will continue to perform under the terms of the modified mortgage loan.

You should note that modifications that are designed to maximize collections in the aggregate may adversely affect a particular class of certificates in the transaction.  The governing document related to your

22

offered certificates will obligate the servicer not to consider the interests of individual classes of certificates.  You should also note that in connection with considering a modification or other type of loss mitigation, the servicer may incur or bear related out-of-pocket expenses, such as appraisal fees, which would be reimbursed to the servicer from the transaction as servicing advances and paid from amounts received on the modified loan or from other mortgage loans in the related mortgage pool but in each case, prior to distributions being made on your offered certificates.

Repayment of a Commercial or Multifamily Mortgage Loan Depends Upon the Performance and Value of the Underlying Real Property, Which May Decline Over Time, and the Related Borrower’s Ability to Refinance the Property, of Which There Is No Assurance

Most of the Mortgage Loans Underlying Your Offered Certificates Will Be Nonrecourse.  You should consider all of the mortgage loans underlying your offered certificates to be nonrecourse loans.  This means that, in the event of a default, recourse will be limited to the related real property or properties securing the defaulted mortgage loan.  In the event that the income generated by a real property were to decline as a result of the poor economic performance of that property, with the result that the property is not able to support debt service payments on the related mortgage loan, neither the related borrower nor any other person would be obligated to remedy the situation by making payments out of their own funds.  In such a situation, the borrower could choose instead to surrender the related mortgaged property to the lender or let it be foreclosed upon. In those cases where recourse to a borrower or guarantor is permitted by the loan documents, we generally will not undertake any evaluation of the financial condition of that borrower or guarantor.  Consequently, full and timely payment on each mortgage loan underlying your offered certificates will depend on one or more of the following:

● the sufficiency of the net operating income of the applicable real property;

● the market value of the applicable real property at or prior to maturity; and

● the ability of the related borrower to refinance or sell the applicable real property.

In general, the value of a multifamily or commercial property will depend on its ability to generate net operating income.  The ability of an owner to finance a multifamily or commercial property will depend, in large part, on the property’s value and ability to generate net operating income.

Unless we state otherwise in the related prospectus supplement, none of the mortgage loans underlying your offered certificates will be insured or guaranteed by any governmental entity or private mortgage insurer.

The risks associated with lending on multifamily and commercial properties are inherently different from those associated with lending on the security of single-family residential properties.  This is because, among other reasons, multifamily rental and commercial real estate lending generally involves larger loans and, as described

above, repayment is dependent upon:

● the successful operation and value of the related mortgaged property, and

● the related borrower’s ability to refinance the mortgage loan or sell the related mortgaged property.

See “—The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered Certificates May Present Special Risks” below.

23

Many Risk Factors Are Common to Most or All Multifamily and Commercial Properties.  The following factors, among others, will affect the ability of a multifamily or commercial property to generate net operating income and, accordingly, its value:

● the location, age, functionality, design and construction quality of the subject property;

● perceptions regarding the safety, convenience and attractiveness of the property;

● the characteristics of the neighborhood where the property is located;

● the degree to which the subject property competes with other properties in the area;

● the proximity and attractiveness of competing properties;

● the existence and construction of competing properties;

● the adequacy of the property’s management and maintenance;

● tenant mix and concentration;

● national, regional or local economic conditions, including plant closings, industry slowdowns and unemployment rates;

● local real estate conditions, including an increase in or oversupply of comparable commercial or residential space;

● demographic factors;

● customer confidence, tastes and preferences;

● retroactive changes in building codes and other applicable laws;

● changes in governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies, including environmental legislation; and

● vulnerability to litigation by tenants and patrons.

Particular factors that may adversely affect the ability of a multifamily or commercial property to generate net operating income include:

● an increase in interest rates, real estate taxes and other operating expenses;

● an increase in the capital expenditures needed to maintain the property or make improvements;

● a decline in the financial condition of a major tenant and, in particular, a sole tenant or anchor tenant;

● an increase in vacancy rates;

● a decline in rental rates as leases are renewed or replaced;

24

● natural disasters and civil disturbances such as earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, eruptions, terrorist attacks or riots; and

● environmental contamination.

The volatility of net operating income generated by a multifamily or commercial property over time will be influenced by many of the foregoing factors, as well as by:

● the length of tenant leases;

● the creditworthiness of tenants;

● the rental rates at which leases are renewed or replaced;

● the percentage of total property expenses in relation to revenue;

● the ratio of fixed operating expenses to those that vary with revenues; and

● the level of capital expenditures required to maintain the property and to maintain or replace tenants.

Therefore, commercial and multifamily properties with short-term or less creditworthy sources of revenue and/or relatively high operating costs, such as those operated as hospitality and self-storage properties, can be expected to have more volatile cash flows than commercial and multifamily properties with medium- to long-term leases from creditworthy tenants and/or relatively low operating costs.  A decline in the real estate market will tend to have a more immediate effect on the net operating income of commercial and multifamily properties with short-term revenue sources and may lead to higher rates of delinquency or defaults on the mortgage loans secured by those properties.

The Successful Operation of a Multifamily or Commercial Property Depends on Tenants.  Generally, multifamily and commercial properties are subject to leases.  The owner of a multifamily or commercial property typically uses lease or rental payments for the following purposes:

● to pay for maintenance and other operating expenses associated with the property;

● to fund repairs, replacements and capital improvements at the property; and

● to service mortgage loans secured by, and any other debt obligations associated with operating, the property.

Accordingly, mortgage loans secured by income-producing properties will be affected by the expiration of leases and the ability of the respective borrowers to renew the leases or relet the space on comparable terms and on a timely basis.

Factors that may adversely affect the ability of an income-producing property to generate net operating income from lease and rental payments include:

● a general inability to lease space;

● an increase in vacancy rates, which may result from tenants deciding not to renew an existing lease or discontinuing operations;

25

● an increase in tenant payment defaults or any other inability to collect rental payments;

● a decline in rental rates as leases are entered into, renewed or extended at lower rates;

● an increase in the capital expenditures needed to maintain the property or to make improvements;

● a decline in the financial condition and/or bankruptcy or insolvency of a significant or sole tenant; and

● an increase in leasing costs and/or the costs of performing landlord obligations under existing leases.

With respect to any mortgage loan backing a series of offered certificates, you should anticipate that, unless the related mortgaged real property is owner occupied, one or more—and possibly all—of the leases at the related mortgaged real property will expire at varying rates during the term of that mortgage loan and some tenants will have, and may exercise, termination options.  In addition, some government-sponsored tenants will have the right as a matter of law to cancel their leases for lack of appropriations.

Additionally, in some jurisdictions, if tenant leases are subordinated to the lien created by the related mortgage instrument but do not contain attornment provisions, which are provisions requiring the tenant to recognize as landlord under the lease a successor owner following foreclosure, the leases may terminate upon the transfer of the property to a foreclosing lender or purchaser at foreclosure.  Accordingly, if a mortgaged real property is located in such a jurisdiction and is leased to one or more desirable tenants under leases that are subordinate to the mortgage and do not contain attornment provisions, that mortgaged real property could experience a further decline in value if such tenants’ leases were terminated.

Some mortgage loans that back offered certificates may be secured by mortgaged real properties with tenants that are related to or affiliated with a borrower.  In those cases a default by the borrower may coincide with a default by the affiliated tenants.  Additionally, even if the property becomes a foreclosure property, it is possible that an affiliate of the borrower may remain as a tenant.

Dependence on a Single Tenant or a Small Number of Tenants Makes a Property Riskier Collateral.  In those cases where an income-producing property is leased to a single tenant or is primarily leased to one or a small number of major tenants, a deterioration in the financial condition or a change in the plan of operations of any of those tenants can have particularly significant effects on the net operating income generated by the property.  If any of those tenants defaults under or fails to renew its lease, the resulting adverse financial effect on the operation of the property will be substantially more severe than would be the case with respect to a property occupied by a large number of less significant tenants.

An income-producing property operated for retail, office or industrial purposes also may be adversely affected by a decline in a particular business or industry if a concentration of tenants at the property is engaged in that business or industry.

Accordingly, factors that will affect the operation and value of a commercial property include:

● the business operated by the tenants;

● the creditworthiness of the tenants; and

● the number of tenants.

26

Tenant Bankruptcy Adversely Affects Property Performance.  The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant, or a number of smaller tenants, at a commercial property may adversely affect the income produced by the property.  Under federal bankruptcy law, a tenant has the option of assuming or rejecting any unexpired lease.  If the tenant rejects the lease, the landlord’s claim for breach of the lease would be a general unsecured claim against the tenant unless there is collateral securing the claim.  The claim would be limited to:

● the unpaid rent due under the lease, without acceleration, for the period prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition or any earlier repossession by the landlord, or surrender by the tenant, of the leased premises, plus

● the rent reserved by the lease, without acceleration, for the greater of one year and 15%, not to exceed three years, of the term of the lease following the filing of the bankruptcy petition or any earlier repossession by the landlord, or surrender by the tenant, of the leased premises.

The Success of an Income-Producing Property Depends on Reletting Vacant Spaces.  The operations at an income-producing property will be adversely affected if the owner or property manager is unable to renew leases or relet space on comparable terms when existing leases expire and/or become defaulted.  Even if vacated space is successfully relet, the costs associated with reletting, including tenant improvements and leasing commissions in the case of income-producing properties operated for retail, office or industrial purposes, can be substantial, could exceed any reserves maintained for that purpose and could reduce cash flow from the income-producing properties.  Moreover, if a tenant at an income-producing property defaults in its lease obligations, the landlord may incur substantial costs and experience significant delays associated with enforcing its rights and protecting its investment, including costs incurred in renovating and reletting the property.

If an income-producing property has multiple tenants, re-leasing expenditures may be more frequent than in the case of a property with fewer tenants, thereby reducing the cash flow generated by the multi-tenanted property.  Multi-tenanted properties may also experience higher continuing vacancy rates and greater volatility in rental income and expenses.

Property Value May Be Adversely Affected Even When Current Operating Income Is Not.  Various factors may affect the value of multifamily and commercial properties without affecting their current net operating income, including:

● changes in interest rates;

● the availability of refinancing sources;

● changes in governmental regulations, licensing or fiscal policy;

● changes in zoning or tax laws; and

● potential environmental or other legal liabilities.

Property Management May Affect Property Operations and Value.  The operation of an income-producing property will depend upon the property manager’s performance and viability.  The property manager generally is responsible for:

● responding to changes in the local market;

● planning and implementing the rental structure, including staggering durations of leases and establishing levels of rent payments;

27

● operating the property and providing building services;

● managing operating expenses; and

● ensuring that maintenance and capital improvements are carried out in a timely fashion.

Income-producing properties that derive revenues primarily from short-term rental commitments, such as hospitality or self-storage properties, generally require more intensive management than properties leased to tenants under long-term leases.

By controlling costs, providing appropriate and efficient services to tenants and maintaining improvements in good condition, a property manager can—

● maintain or improve occupancy rates, business and cash flow,

● reduce operating and repair costs, and

● preserve building value.

On the other hand, management errors can, in some cases, impair the long term viability of an income-producing property.

Certain of the mortgaged properties will be managed by affiliates of the related borrower.  If a mortgage loan is in default or undergoing special servicing, such relationship could disrupt the management of the related mortgaged property, which may adversely affect cash flow.  However, the related mortgage loans will generally permit, in the case of mortgaged properties managed by borrower affiliates, the lender to remove the related property manager upon the occurrence of one or more of the following: an event of default, a decline in cash flow below a specified level or the failure to satisfy some other specified performance trigger.

We make no representation or warranty as to the skills of any present or future managers.  Additionally, we cannot assure you that the property managers will be in a financial condition to fulfill their management responsibilities throughout the terms of their respective management agreements.  Further, certain individuals involved in the management or general business development at certain mortgaged properties may engage in unlawful activities or otherwise exhibit poor business judgment that adversely affect operations and ultimately cash flow at such properties.

Maintaining a Property in Good Condition Is Expensive.  The owner may be required to expend a substantial amount to maintain, renovate or refurbish a commercial or multifamily property.  Failure to do so may materially impair the property’s ability to generate cash flow.  The effects of poor construction quality will increase over time in the form of increased maintenance and capital improvements.  Even superior construction will deteriorate over time if management does not schedule and perform adequate maintenance in a timely fashion.  There can be no assurance that an income-producing property will generate sufficient cash flow to cover the increased costs of maintenance and capital improvements in addition to paying debt service on the mortgage loan(s) that may encumber that property.

Competition Will Adversely Affect the Profitability and Value of an Income-Producing Property.  Some income-producing properties are located in highly competitive areas.  Comparable income-producing properties located in the same area compete on the basis of a number of factors including:

● rental rates;

● location;

28

● type of business or services and amenities offered; and

● nature and condition of the particular property.

The profitability and value of an income-producing property may be adversely affected by a comparable property that:

● offers lower rents;

● has lower operating costs;

● offers a more favorable location; or

● offers better facilities.

Costs of renovating, refurbishing or expanding an income-producing property in order to remain competitive can be substantial.

The Prospective Performance of the Multifamily and Commercial Mortgage Loans to be Included in Any of Our Trusts Should be Evaluated Separately from the Performance of the Multifamily and Commercial Mortgage Loans in Any of Our Other Trusts.  Notwithstanding that there are many common factors affecting the profitability and value of income producing properties in general, those factors do not apply equally to all income producing properties and, in many cases, there are special factors that will affect the profitability and/or value of a particular income producing property.  See, for example, “—The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered Certificates May Present Special Risks” below.  Each income producing property represents a separate and distinct business venture; and, as a result, each of the multifamily and commercial mortgage loans included in one of our trusts requires a unique underwriting analysis.  Furthermore, economic conditions, whether worldwide, national, regional or local, vary over time.  The performance of a mortgage pool originated and outstanding under one set of economic conditions may vary dramatically from the performance of an otherwise comparable mortgage pool originated and outstanding under a different set of economic conditions.  Accordingly, investors should evaluate the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates independently from the performance of the mortgage loans underlying any other series of offered certificates.

The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered Certificates May Present Special Risks

General.  The mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may be secured by numerous types of multifamily and commercial properties.  As discussed under “—Repayment of a Commercial or Multifamily Mortgage Loan Depends on the Performance and Value of the Underlying Real Property, Which May Decline Over Time, and the Related Borrower’s Ability to Refinance the Property, of Which There is No Assurance” above, the adequacy of an income-producing property as security for a mortgage loan depends in large part on its value and ability to generate net operating income.  The relative importance of any factor affecting the value or operation of an income-producing property will depend on the type and use of the property and the type and use of a particular income-producing property may present special risks. Additionally, many types of commercial properties are not readily convertible to alternative uses if the original use is not successful or may require significant capital expenditures to effect any conversion to an alternative use.  As a result, the liquidation value of any of those types of property would be substantially less than would otherwise be the case.  Set forth below is a discussion of some of the various factors that may affect the value and operations of the indicated types of multifamily and commercial properties.

29

Multifamily Rental Properties.  Factors affecting the value and operation of a multifamily rental property include:

● the physical attributes of the property, such as its age, appearance, amenities and construction quality, in relation to competing buildings;

● the types of services or amenities offered at the property;

● the location of the property;

● distance from employment centers and shopping areas;

● the characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood, which may change over time;

● the rents charged for dwelling units at the property relative to the rents charged for comparable units at competing properties;

● the ability of management to provide adequate maintenance and insurance;

● the property’s reputation;

● the level of mortgage interest rates, which may encourage tenants to purchase rather than lease housing;

● the existence or construction of competing or alternative residential properties in the local market, including other apartment buildings and complexes, manufactured housing communities, mobile home parks and single-family housing;

● compliance with and continuance of any government housing rental subsidy programs and/or low income housing tax credit or incentive programs from which the property receives benefits;

● the ability of management to respond to competition;

● the tenant mix and whether the property is primarily occupied by workers from a particular company or type of business, personnel from a local military base or students;

● in the case of student housing facilities, the reliance on the financial well-being of the college or university to which it relates, competition from on-campus housing units, and the relatively higher turnover rate compared to other types of multifamily tenants;

● adverse local, regional or national economic conditions, which may limit the amount that may be charged for rents and may result in a reduction in timely rent payments or a reduction in occupancy levels;

● local factory or other large employer closings;

● state and local regulations, which may affect the property owner’s ability to evict tenants or to increase rent to the market rent for an equivalent apartment;

● the extent to which the property is subject to land use restrictive covenants or contractual covenants that require that units be rented to low income tenants;

30

● the extent to which the cost of operating the property, including the cost of utilities and the cost of required capital expenditures, may increase;

● whether the property is subject to any age restrictions on tenants;

● the extent to which increases in operating costs may be passed through to tenants; and

● the financial condition of the owner of the property.

Because units in a multifamily rental property are leased to individuals, usually for no more than a year, the property is likely to respond relatively quickly to a downturn in the local economy or to the closing of a major employer in the area.

In addition, multifamily rental properties are typically in markets that, in general, are characterized by low barriers to entry. Thus, a particular multifamily rental property market with historically low vacancies could experience substantial new construction and a resultant oversupply of rental units within a relatively short period of time. Since apartments within a multifamily rental property are typically leased on a short-term basis, the tenants residing at a particular property may easily move to alternative multifamily rental properties with more desirable amenities or locations or to single family housing.

Some states regulate the relationship of an owner and its tenants at a multifamily rental property.  Among other things, these states may—

● require written leases;

● require good cause for eviction;

● require disclosure of fees;

● prohibit unreasonable rules;

● prohibit retaliatory evictions;

● prohibit restrictions on a resident’s choice of unit vendors;

● limit the bases on which a landlord may increase rent; or

● prohibit a landlord from terminating a tenancy solely by reason of the sale of the owner’s building.

Apartment building owners have been the subject of suits under state Unfair and Deceptive Practices Acts and other general consumer protection statutes for coercive, abusive or unconscionable leasing and sales practices.

Some counties and municipalities also impose rent control and/or rent stabilization regulations on apartment buildings.  These regulations may limit rent increases to—

● fixed percentages,

● percentages of increases in the consumer price index,

● increases set or approved by a governmental agency, or

31

● increases determined through mediation or binding arbitration.

In many cases, the rent control or rent stabilization laws do not provide for decontrol of rental rates upon vacancy of individual units.  Any limitations on a landlord’s ability to raise rents at a multifamily rental property may impair the landlord’s ability to repay a mortgage loan secured by the property or to meet operating costs.

Some multifamily rental properties are subject to land use restrictive covenants or contractual covenants in favor of federal or state housing agencies.  These covenants generally require that a minimum number or percentage of units be rented to tenants who have incomes that are substantially lower than median incomes in the area or region.  These covenants may limit the potential rental rates that may be charged at a multifamily rental property, the potential tenant base for the property or both.  An owner may subject a multifamily rental property to these covenants in exchange for tax credits or rent subsidies.  When the credits or subsidies cease, net operating income will decline.  In addition, the differences in rents between subsidized or supported properties and other multifamily rental properties in the same area may not be a sufficient economic incentive for some eligible tenants to reside at a subsidized or supported property that may have fewer amenities or be less attractive as a residence.  As a result, occupancy levels at a subsidized or supported property may decline, which may adversely affect the value and successful operation of the property.

Cooperatively-Owned Apartment Buildings.  Some multifamily properties are owned or leased by cooperative corporations.  In general, each shareholder in the corporation is entitled to occupy a particular apartment unit under a long-term proprietary lease or occupancy agreement.

A tenant/shareholder of a cooperative corporation must make a monthly maintenance payment to the corporation.  The monthly maintenance payment represents a tenant/shareholder’s pro rata share of the corporation’s—

● mortgage loan payments,

● real property taxes,

● maintenance expenses, and

● other capital and ordinary expenses of the property.

These monthly maintenance payments are in addition to any payments of principal and interest the tenant/shareholder must make on any loans of the tenant/shareholder secured by its shares in the corporation.

A cooperative corporation is directly responsible for building maintenance and payment of real estate taxes and hazard and liability insurance premiums.  A cooperative corporation’s ability to meet debt service obligations on a mortgage loan secured by, and to pay all other operating expenses of, the cooperatively owned property depends primarily upon the receipt of—

● maintenance payments from the tenant/shareholders, and

● any rental income from units or commercial space that the cooperative corporation might control.

A cooperative corporation may have to impose special assessments on the tenant/shareholders in order to pay unanticipated expenditures.  Accordingly, a cooperative corporation is highly dependent on the financial well being of its tenant/shareholders.  A cooperative corporation’s ability to pay the amount of any balloon payment due at the maturity of a mortgage loan secured by the cooperatively owned property depends primarily on its ability to refinance the property.  Additional factors likely to affect the economic performance of a cooperative corporation include—

32

● the failure of the corporation to qualify for favorable tax treatment as a “cooperative housing corporation” each year, which may reduce the cash flow available to make debt service payments on a mortgage loan secured by cooperatively owned property; and

● the possibility that, upon foreclosure, if the cooperatively owned property becomes a rental property, certain units could be subject to rent control, stabilization and tenants’ rights laws, at below market rents, which may affect rental income levels and the marketability and sale proceeds of the ensuing rental property as a whole.

In a typical cooperative conversion plan, the owner of a rental apartment building contracts to sell the building to a newly formed cooperative corporation.  Shares are allocated to each apartment unit by the owner or sponsor.  The current tenants have a specified period to subscribe at prices discounted from the prices to be offered to the public after that period.  As part of the consideration for the sale, the owner or sponsor receives all the unsold shares of the cooperative corporation.  In general the sponsor controls the corporation’s board of directors and management for a limited period of time.  If the sponsor of the cooperative corporation holds the shares allocated to a large number of apartment units, the lender on a mortgage loan secured by a cooperatively owned property may be adversely affected by a decline in the creditworthiness of that sponsor.

Many cooperative conversion plans are non-eviction plans.  Under a non-eviction plan, a tenant at the time of conversion who chooses not to purchase shares is entitled to reside in its apartment  unit as a subtenant from the owner of the shares allocated to that unit.  Any applicable rent control or rent stabilization laws would continue to be applicable to the subtenancy.  In addition, the subtenant may be entitled to renew its lease for an indefinite number of years with continued protection from rent increases above those permitted by any applicable rent control and rent stabilization laws.  The owner/shareholder is responsible for the maintenance payments to the cooperative corporation without regard to whether it receives rent from the subtenant or whether the rent payments are lower than maintenance payments on the unit.  Newly-formed cooperative corporations typically have the greatest concentration of non-tenant/ shareholders.

Retail Properties.  The term “retail property” encompasses a broad range of properties at which businesses sell consumer goods and other products and provide various entertainment, recreational or personal services to the general public.  Some examples of retail properties include—

● shopping centers,

● factory outlet centers,

● malls,

● automotive sales and service centers,

● consumer oriented businesses,

● department stores,

● grocery stores,

● convenience stores,

● specialty shops,

● gas stations,

33

● movie theaters,

● fitness centers,

● bowling alleys,

● salons, and

● dry cleaners.

A number of factors may affect the value and operation of a retail property. Some of these factors include:

● the strength, stability, number and quality of the tenants;

● tenants’ sales;

● tenant mix;

● whether the property is in a desirable location;

● the physical condition and amenities of the building in relation to competing buildings;

● whether a retail property is anchored, shadow anchored or unanchored and, if anchored or shadow anchored, the strength, stability, quality and continuous occupancy of the anchor tenant or the shadow anchor, as the case may be, are particularly important factors; and

● the financial condition of the owner of the property.

Unless owner occupied, retail properties generally derive all or a substantial percentage of their income from lease payments from commercial tenants.  Therefore, it is important for the owner of a retail property to attract and keep tenants, particularly significant tenants, that are able to meet their lease obligations.  In order to attract tenants, the owner of a retail property may be required to—

● lower rents,

● grant a potential tenant a free rent or reduced rent period,

● improve the condition of the property generally, or

● make at its own expense, or grant a rent abatement to cover, tenant improvements for a potential tenant.

A prospective tenant will also be interested in the number and type of customers that it will be able to attract at a particular retail property.  The ability of a tenant at a particular retail property to attract customers will be affected by a number of factors related to the property and the surrounding area, including:

● competition from other retail properties;

● perceptions regarding the safety, convenience and attractiveness of the property;

● perceptions regarding the safety of the surrounding area;

34

● demographics of the surrounding area;

● the strength and stability of the local, regional and national economies;

● traffic patterns and access to major thoroughfares;

● the visibility of the property;

● availability of parking;

● the particular mixture of the goods and services offered at the property;

● customer tastes, preferences and spending patterns; and

● the drawing power of other tenants.

The success of a retail property is often dependent on the success of its tenants’ businesses.  A significant component of the total rent paid by tenants of retail properties is often tied to a percentage of gross sales or revenues.  Declines in sales or revenues of the tenants will likely cause a corresponding decline in percentage rents and/or impair the tenants’ ability to pay their rent or other occupancy costs.  A default by a tenant under its lease could result in delays and costs in enforcing the landlord’s rights.  Retail properties would be directly and adversely affected by a decline in the local economy and reduced consumer spending.

Repayment of a mortgage loan secured by a retail property will be affected by the expiration of space leases at the property and the ability of the borrower to renew or relet the space on comparable terms.  Even if vacant space is successfully relet, the costs associated with reletting, including tenant improvements, leasing commissions and free rent, may be substantial and could reduce cash flow from a retail property.

With respect to some retail properties, one or more tenants may have the option, at any time or after the expiration of a specified period, to terminate their leases at the subject property.  In many cases, the tenant is required to provide notice and/or pay penalties in connection with the exercise of its termination option.  Generally, the full rental income generated by the related leases will be taken into account in the underwriting of the related underlying mortgage loan. Notwithstanding any disincentives with respect to a termination option, there can be no assurance a tenant will not exercise such an option, especially if the rent paid by that tenant is in excess of market rent. In such event, there may be a decrease in the cash flow generated by such mortgaged properties and available to make payments on the related offered certificates.

The presence or absence of an anchor tenant in a multi-tenanted retail property can be important.  Anchor tenants play a key role in generating customer traffic and making the center desirable for other tenants.  Retail properties that are anchored have traditionally been perceived as less risky than unanchored properties. As to any given retail property, an anchor tenant is generally understood to be a nationally or regionally recognized tenant whose space is, in general, materially larger in size than the space occupied by other tenants at the same retail property and is important in attracting customers to the retail property.  Retail properties that have anchor tenant-owned stores often have reciprocal easement and operating agreements between the property owner and such anchor tenants containing certain operating and maintenance covenants.  Although an anchor tenant is required to pay a contribution toward common area maintenance and real estate taxes on the improvements and related real property, an anchor tenant that owns its own parcel does not pay rent.

Certain tenant estoppels will have been obtained from anchor and certain other tenants in connection with the origination of the mortgage loans that identify disputes between the related borrower and the applicable tenant, or alleged defaults or potential defaults by the applicable property owner under the lease or a reciprocal easement and operating agreement.  Such disputes, defaults or potential defaults, could lead to a termination or

35

attempted termination of the applicable lease or reciprocal easement and operating agreement by the tenant or to litigation against the related borrower.  We cannot assure you that these tenant disputes will not have a material adverse effect on the ability of the related borrowers to repay their portion of the mortgage loan.  In addition, we cannot assure you that the tenant estoppels obtained identify all potential disputes that may arise with tenants.

A retail property may also benefit from a shadow anchor. A shadow anchor is a store or business that satisfies the criteria for an anchor store or business, but which may be located at an adjoining property or on a portion of the subject retail property that is not collateral for the related mortgage loan. A shadow anchor may own the space it occupies. In those cases where the property owner does not control the space occupied by the anchor store or business, the property owner may not be able to take actions with respect to the space that it otherwise typically would, such as granting concessions to retain an anchor tenant or removing an ineffective anchor tenant.

In some cases, an anchor tenant or a shadow anchor may cease to operate at the property, thereby leaving its space unoccupied even though it continues to pay rent on or even own the vacant space.  If an anchor tenant or a shadow anchor ceases operations at a retail property or if its sales do not reach a specified threshold, other tenants at the property may be entitled to terminate their leases prior to the scheduled expiration date or to pay rent at a reduced rate for the remaining term of the lease.

Accordingly, the following factors, among others, will adversely affect the economic performance of an anchored retail property, including:

● an anchor tenant’s failure to renew its lease;

● termination of an anchor tenant’s lease;

● the bankruptcy or economic decline of an anchor tenant or a shadow anchor;

● the cessation of the business of a self-owned anchor or of an anchor tenant, notwithstanding its continued ownership of the previously occupied space or its continued payment of rent, as the case may be; or

● a loss of an anchor tenant’s ability to attract shoppers.

Retail properties may also face competition from sources outside a given real estate market or with lower operating costs.  For example, all of the following compete with more traditional department stores and specialty shops for consumer dollars:

● factory outlet centers;

● discount shopping centers and clubs;

● catalogue retailers;

● home shopping networks and programs;

● internet web sites and electronic media shopping; and

● telemarketing.

36

Similarly, home movie rentals and pay-per-view movies provide alternate sources of entertainment to movie theaters.  Continued growth of these alternative retail outlets and entertainment sources, which are often characterized by lower operating costs, could adversely affect the rents collectible at retail properties.

Gas stations, automotive sales and service centers and dry cleaners also pose unique environmental risks because of the nature of their businesses and the types of products used or sold in those businesses.

Office Properties.  Factors affecting the value and operation of an office property include:

● the strength, stability, number and quality of the tenants, particularly significant tenants, at the property;

● the physical attributes and amenities of the building in relation to competing buildings, including the condition of the HVAC system, parking and the building’s compatibility with current business wiring requirements;

● whether the area is a desirable business location, including local labor cost and quality, tax environment, including tax benefits, and quality of life issues, such as schools and cultural amenities;

● the location of the property with respect to the central business district or population centers;

● demographic trends within the metropolitan area to move away from or towards the central business district;

● social trends combined with space management trends, which may change towards options such as telecommuting or hoteling to satisfy space needs;

● tax incentives offered to businesses or property owners by cities or suburbs adjacent to or near where the building is located;

● local competitive conditions, such as the supply of office space or the existence or construction of new competitive office buildings;

● the quality and philosophy of building management;

● access to mass transportation;

● accessibility from surrounding highways/streets;

● changes in zoning laws; and

● the financial condition of the owner of the property.

With respect to some office properties, one or more tenants may have the option, at any time or after the expiration of a specified period, to terminate their leases at the subject property.  In many cases, the tenant is required to provide notice and/or pay penalties in connection with the exercise of its termination option.  Generally, the full rental income generated by the related leases will be taken into account in the underwriting of the related underlying mortgage loan. Notwithstanding any disincentives with respect to a termination option, there can be no assurance that a tenant will not exercise such an option, especially if the rent paid by that tenant is in excess of market rent. In such event, there may be a decrease in the cash flow generated by such mortgaged properties and available to make payments on the related offered certificates.

37

Office properties may be adversely affected by an economic decline in the business operated by their tenants.  The risk associated with that economic decline is increased if revenue is dependent on a single tenant or if there is a significant concentration of tenants in a particular business or industry.

Office properties are also subject to competition with other office properties in the same market.  Competitive factors affecting an office property include:

● rental rates;

● the building’s age, condition and design, including floor sizes and layout;

● access to public transportation and availability of parking; and

● amenities offered to its tenants, including sophisticated building systems, such as fiber optic cables, satellite communications or other base building technological features.

The cost of refitting office space for a new tenant is often higher than for other property types.

The success of an office property also depends on the local economy.  Factors influencing a company’s decision to locate in a given area include:

● the cost and quality of labor;

● tax incentives; and

● quality of life considerations, such as schools and cultural amenities.

The strength and stability of the local or regional economy will affect an office property’s ability to attract stable tenants on a consistent basis.  A central business district may have a substantially different economy from that of a suburb.

Hospitality Properties.  Hospitality properties may involve different types of hotels and motels, including:

● full service hotels;

● resort hotels with many amenities;

● limited service hotels;

● hotels and motels associated with national or regional franchise chains;

● hotels that are not affiliated with any franchise chain but may have their own brand identity; and

● other lodging facilities.

Factors affecting the value, operation and economic performance of a hospitality property include:

● the location of the property and its proximity to major population centers or attractions;

● the seasonal nature of business at the property;

● the level of room rates relative to those charged by competitors;

38

● quality and perception of the franchise affiliation;

● economic conditions, either local, regional or national, which may limit the amount that can be charged for a room and may result in a reduction in occupancy levels;

● the existence or construction of competing hospitality properties;

● nature and quality of the services and facilities;

● financial strength and capabilities of the owner and operator;

● the need for continuing expenditures for modernizing, refurbishing and maintaining existing facilities;

● increases in operating costs, which may not be offset by increased room rates;

● the property’s dependence on business and commercial travelers and tourism;

● changes in travel patterns caused by changes in access, energy prices, labor strikes, relocation of highways, the reconstruction of additional highways or other factors; and

● changes in travel patterns caused by perceptions of travel safety, which perceptions can be significantly and adversely influenced by terrorist acts and foreign conflict as well as apprehension regarding the possibility of such acts or conflicts.

Because limited service hotels and motels are relatively quick and inexpensive to construct and may quickly reflect a positive value, an over-building of these hotels and motels could occur in any given region, which would likely adversely affect occupancy and daily room rates.  Further, because rooms at hospitality properties are generally rented for short periods of time, hospitality properties tend to be more sensitive to adverse economic conditions and competition than many other types of commercial properties.  Additionally, the revenues of some hospitality properties, particularly those located in regions whose economies depend upon tourism, may be highly seasonal in nature and/or may be adversely affected by prolonged unfavorable weather conditions.

Hospitality properties may be operated under franchise agreements.  The continuation of a franchise is typically subject to specified operating standards and other terms and conditions.  The franchisor periodically inspects its licensed properties to confirm adherence to its operating standards.  The failure of the hospitality property to maintain those standards or adhere to those other terms and conditions could result in the loss or cancellation of the franchise license.  It is possible that the franchisor could condition the continuation of a franchise license on the completion of capital improvements or the making of capital expenditures that the owner of the hospitality property determines are too expensive or are otherwise unwarranted in light of the operating results or prospects of the property.  In that event, the owner of the hospitality property may elect to allow the franchise license to lapse.  In any case, if the franchise is terminated, the owner of the hospitality property may seek to obtain a suitable replacement franchise, which may be at significantly higher fees than the previous franchise, or to operate property independently of a franchise license.  The loss of a franchise license could have a material adverse effect upon the operations or value of the hospitality property because of the loss of associated name recognition, marketing support and centralized reservation systems provided by the franchisor.

The viability of any hospitality property that is a franchise of a national or a regional hotel or motel chain is dependent upon:

● the continued existence and financial strength of the franchisor;

39

● the public perception of the franchise service mark; and

● the duration of the franchise licensing agreement.

The transferability of franchise license agreements may be restricted.  The consent of the franchisor would be required for the continued use of the franchise license by the hospitality property following a foreclosure.  Conversely, a lender may be unable to remove a franchisor that it desires to replace following a foreclosure.  Additionally, any provision in a franchise agreement or management agreement providing for termination because of a bankruptcy of a franchisor or manager will generally not be enforceable.

In the event of a foreclosure on a hospitality property, the lender or other purchaser of the hospitality property may not be entitled to the rights under any associated operating, liquor and other licenses.  That party would be required to apply in its own right for new operating, liquor and other licenses.  There can be no assurance that a new license could be obtained or that it could be obtained promptly.  The lack of a liquor license in a hospitality property could have an adverse impact on the revenue from that property or on its occupancy rate.

Casino Properties.  Factors affecting the economic performance of a casino property include:

● location, including proximity to or easy access from major population centers;

● appearance;

● economic conditions, either local, regional or national, which may limit the amount of disposable income that potential patrons may have for gambling;

● the existence or construction of competing casinos;

● dependence on tourism; and

● local or state governmental regulation.

Competition among major casinos may involve attracting patrons by—

● providing alternate forms of entertainment, such as performers and sporting events, and

● offering low-priced or free food and lodging.

Casino owners may expend substantial sums to modernize, refurbish and maintain existing facilities.

Because of their dependence on disposable income of patrons, casino properties are likely to respond quickly to a downturn in the economy.

The ownership, operation, maintenance and/or financing of casino properties is often subject to local or state governmental regulation.  A government agency or authority may have jurisdiction over or influence with respect to the foreclosure of a casino property or the bankruptcy of its owner or operator.  In some jurisdictions, it may be necessary to receive governmental approval before foreclosing, thereby resulting in substantial delays to a lender.  Gaming licenses are not transferable, including in connection with a foreclosure.  There can be no assurance that a lender or another purchaser in foreclosure or otherwise will be able to obtain the requisite approvals to continue operating the foreclosed property as a casino.

Any given state or municipality that currently allows legalized gambling could pass legislation banning it.

40

The loss of a gaming license for any reason would have a material adverse effect on the value of a casino property.

Health Care-Related Properties.  Health care-related properties include:

● hospitals;

● medical offices;

● skilled nursing facilities;

● nursing homes;

● congregate care facilities; and

● in some cases, assisted living centers and housing for seniors.

Health care-related facilities, particularly nursing homes, may receive a substantial portion of their revenues from government reimbursement programs, primarily Medicaid and Medicare.  Medicaid and Medicare are subject to:

● statutory and regulatory changes;

● retroactive rate adjustments;

● administrative rulings;

● policy interpretations;

● delays by fiscal intermediaries; and

● government funding restrictions.

In addition, nursing facilities and assisted living facilities that are dependent on revenues from other third party payors (other than Medicare and Medicaid), such as private insurers, are also affected by the reimbursement policies of those payors.

All of the foregoing can adversely affect revenues from the operation of a health care-related facility.  Moreover, governmental payors have employed cost-containment measures that limit payments to health care providers.  In addition, there are currently under consideration various proposals for national health care relief that could further limit these payments.

Health care-related facilities are subject to significant governmental regulation of the ownership, operation, maintenance and/or financing of those properties. Providers of long-term nursing care and other medical services are highly regulated by federal, state and local law.  They are subject to numerous factors which can increase the cost of operation, limit growth and, in extreme cases, require or result in suspension or cessation of operations, including:

● federal and state licensing requirements;

● facility inspections;

41

● rate setting;

● disruptions in payments;

● reimbursement policies;

● audits, which may result in recoupment of payments made or withholding of payments due;

● laws relating to the adequacy of medical care, distribution of pharmaceuticals, use of equipment, personnel operating policies and maintenance of and additions to facilities and services;

● patient care liability claims, including those generated by the recent advent of the use of video surveillance, or “granny cams”, by family members or government prosecutors to monitor care and limited availability and increased costs of insurance; and

● shortages in staffing, increases in labor costs and labor disputes.

Under applicable federal and state laws and regulations, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements generally may not be made to any person other than the provider who actually furnished the related material goods and services.  Accordingly, in the event of foreclosure on a health care-related facility, neither a lender nor other subsequent lessee or operator of the property would generally be entitled to obtain from federal or state governments any outstanding reimbursement payments relating to services furnished at the property prior to foreclosure.  Furthermore, in the event of foreclosure, there can be no assurance that a lender or other purchaser in a foreclosure sale would be entitled to the rights under any required licenses and regulatory approvals.  The lender or other purchaser may have to apply in its own right for those licenses and approvals.  There can be no assurance that a new license could be obtained or that a new approval would be granted.  In addition, there can be no assurance that the facilities will remain licensed and loss of licensure/provider arrangements by a significant number of facilities could have a material adverse effect on a borrower’s ability to meet its obligations under the related mortgage loan and, therefore, on distributions on your certificates.

With respect to health care-related properties, the regulatory environment has intensified, particularly the long-term care service environment for large, for profit, multi-facility providers. For example, in the past few years, federal prosecutors have utilized the federal false claims act to prosecute nursing facilities that have quality of care deficiencies or reported instances of possible patient abuse and neglect, falsification of records, failure to report adverse events, improper use of restraints, and certain other care issues.  Since facilities convicted under the false claims act may be liable for triple damages plus mandatory civil penalties, nursing facilities often settled with the government for a substantial amount of money rather than defending the allegations.

The extensive federal, state and local regulations affecting health care-related facilities include regulations on the financial and other arrangements that facilities enter into during the normal course of business.  For example, anti-kickback laws prohibit certain business practices and relationships that might affect the provision and cost of health care services reimbursable under Medicare and Medicaid programs, including the payment or receipt of money or anything else of value in return for the referral of patients whose care will be paid by those programs.  Sanctions for violations include criminal penalties and civil sanctions, fines and possible exclusion from payor programs. Federal and state governments have used monetary recoveries derived from prosecutions to strengthen their fraud detection and enforcement programs.  There can be no assurance that government officials charged with responsibility for enforcing the anti-kickback and/or self-referral laws will not assert that certain arrangements or practices are in violation of such provisions.  The operations of a nursing facility or assisted living facility could be adversely affected by the failure of its arrangements to comply with such laws or similar state laws enacted in the future.

42

Each state also has a Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, which typically operates as a division of the state Attorney General’s Office or equivalent, which conducts criminal and civil investigations into alleged abuse, neglect, mistreatment and/or misappropriation of resident property.  In some cases, the allegations may be investigated by the state Attorney General, local authorities and federal and/or state survey agencies.  There are Medicaid Fraud Control Unit and state Attorney General investigations pending and, from time to time, threatened against providers, relating to or arising out of allegations of potential resident abuse, neglect or mistreatment.

Further, the nursing facilities and assisted living facilities are likely to compete on a local and regional basis with each other and with other providers who operate similar facilities.  They may also compete with providers of long term care services in other settings, such as hospital rehabilitation units or home health agencies or other community-based providers.  The formation of managed care networks and integrated delivery systems, as well as increasing government efforts to encourage the use of home and community-based services instead of nursing facility services, could also adversely affect nursing facilities or assisted living facilities if there are incentives that lead to the utilization of other facilities or community-based home care providers, instead of nursing facility or assisted living providers, or if competition drives down prices paid by residents. Some of the competitors of the subject facilities may be better capitalized, may offer services not offered by the facilities, or may be owned by agencies supported by other sources of income or revenue not available to for-profit facilities, such as tax revenues and charitable contributions.  The success of a facility also depends upon the number of competing facilities in the local market, as well as upon other factors, such as the facility’s age, appearance, reputation and management, resident and family preferences, referrals by and affiliations with managed care organizations, relationship with other health care providers and other health care networks, the types of services provided and, where applicable, the quality of care and the cost of that care.  If the facilities fail to attract patients and residents and compete effectively with other health care providers, their revenues and profitability may decline.

Health care-related facilities are generally special purpose properties that could not be readily converted to general residential, retail or office use.  This will adversely affect their liquidation value.  Furthermore, transfers of health care-related facilities are subject to regulatory approvals under state, and in some cases federal, law not required for transfers of most other types of commercial properties.  Moreover, in certain circumstances, such as when federal or state authorities believe that liquidation may adversely affect the health, safety or welfare of the nursing facility and/or assisted living facility residents, a facility operator may not be allowed to liquidate for an indeterminate period of time.  Finally, the receipt of any liquidation proceeds could be delayed by the approval process of any state agency necessary for the transfer of a mortgaged real property and even reduced to satisfy governmental obligations of the facility, such as audit recoupments from nursing facilities.

Industrial Properties.  Industrial properties may be adversely affected by reduced demand for industrial space occasioned by a decline in a particular industry segment and/or by a general slowdown in the economy.  In addition, an industrial property that suited the particular needs of its original tenant may be difficult to relet to another tenant or may become functionally obsolete relative to newer properties.  Also, lease terms with respect to industrial properties are generally for shorter periods of time and may result in a substantial percentage of leases expiring in the same year at any particular industrial property.

The value and operation of an industrial property depends on:

● location of the property, the desirability of which in a particular instance may depend on—

1. availability of labor services,

2. proximity to supply sources and customers, and

43

3. accessibility to various modes of transportation and shipping, including railways, roadways, airline terminals and ports;

● building design of the property, the desirability of which in a particular instance may depend on—

1. ceiling heights,

2. column spacing,

3. number and depth of loading bays,

4. divisibility,

5. floor loading capacities,

6. truck turning radius,

7. overall functionality, and

8. adaptability of the property, because industrial tenants often need space that is acceptable for highly specialized activities; and

● the quality and creditworthiness of individual tenants, because industrial properties frequently have higher tenant concentrations.

Industrial properties are generally special purpose properties that could not be readily converted to general residential, retail or office use.  This will adversely affect their liquidation value.  In addition, properties used for many industrial purposes are more prone to environmental concerns than other property types.

Warehouse, Mini-Warehouse and Self-Storage Facilities.  Warehouse, mini-warehouse and self-storage properties are considered vulnerable to competition because both acquisition costs and break-even occupancy are relatively low.  Depending on their location, mini-warehouses and self-storage facilities tend to be adversely affected more quickly by a general economic downturn than other types of commercial properties.  In addition, it would require substantial capital expenditures to convert a warehouse, mini-warehouse or self-storage property to an alternative use.  This will materially impair the liquidation value of the property if its operation for storage purposes becomes unprofitable due to decreased demand, competition, age of improvements or other factors.

Successful operation of a warehouse, mini-warehouse or self-storage property depends on—

● building design,

● location and visibility,

● tenant privacy,

● efficient access to the property,

● proximity to potential users, including apartment complexes or commercial users,

● services provided at the property, such as security,

44

● age and appearance of the improvements, and

● quality of management.

In addition, it is difficult to assess the environmental risks posed by warehouse, mini-warehouse and self-storage properties due to tenant privacy restrictions, tenant anonymity and unsupervised access to such facilities.  Therefore, these facilities may pose additional environmental risks to investors.  Environmental site assessments performed with respect to warehouse, mini-warehouse and self-storage properties would not include an inspection of the contents of the facilities.  Therefore, it would not be possible to provide assurance that any of the units included in these kinds of facilities are free from hazardous substances or other pollutants or contaminants.

A self storage property may be affiliated with a franchise company through a franchise agreement.  The performance of a self storage property affiliated with a franchise company may be affected by the continued existence and financial strength of the franchisor, the public perception of a service mark, and the duration of the franchise agreement.  The transferability of franchise license agreements is restricted.  In the event of a foreclosure, the lender or its agent would not have the right to use the franchise license without the franchisor’s consent.

Restaurants and Taverns.  Factors affecting the economic viability of individual restaurants, taverns and other establishments that are part of the food and beverage service industry include:

● competition from facilities having businesses similar to a particular restaurant or tavern;

● perceptions by prospective customers of safety, convenience, services and attractiveness;

● the cost, quality and availability of food and beverage products;

● negative publicity, resulting from instances of food contamination, food-borne illness and similar events;

● changes in demographics, consumer habits and traffic patterns;

● the ability to provide or contract for capable management; and

● retroactive changes to building codes, similar ordinances and other legal requirements.

Adverse economic conditions, whether local, regional or national, may limit the amount that may be charged for food and beverages and the extent to which potential customers dine out.  Because of the nature of the business, restaurants and taverns tend to respond to adverse economic conditions more quickly than do many other types of commercial properties.  Furthermore, the transferability of any operating, liquor and other licenses to an entity acquiring a bar or restaurant, either through purchase or foreclosure, is subject to local law requirements.

The food and beverage service industry is highly competitive.  The principal means of competition are—

● market segment,

● product,

● price,

● value,

45

● quality,

● service,

● convenience,

● location, and

● the nature and condition of the restaurant facility.

A restaurant or tavern operator competes with the operators of comparable establishments in the area in which its restaurant or tavern is located.  Other restaurants could have—

● lower operating costs,

● more favorable locations,

● more effective marketing,

● more efficient operations, or

● better facilities.

The location and condition of a particular restaurant or tavern will affect the number of customers and, to an extent, the prices that may be charged.  The characteristics of an area or neighborhood in which a restaurant or tavern is located may change over time or in relation to competing facilities.  Also, the cleanliness and maintenance at a restaurant or tavern will affect its appeal to customers.  In the case of a regionally- or nationally-known chain restaurant, there may be costly expenditures for renovation, refurbishment or expansion, regardless of its condition.

Factors affecting the success of a regionally- or nationally-known chain restaurant include:

● actions and omissions of any franchisor, including management practices that—

1. adversely affect the nature of the business, or

2. require renovation, refurbishment, expansion or other expenditures;

● the degree of support provided or arranged by the franchisor, including its franchisee organizations and third-party providers of products or services; and

● the bankruptcy or business discontinuation of the franchisor or any of its franchisee organizations or third-party providers.

Chain restaurants may be operated under franchise agreements.  Those agreements typically do not contain provisions protective of lenders.  A borrower’s rights as franchisee typically may be terminated without informing the lender, and the borrower may be precluded from competing with the franchisor upon termination.  In addition, a lender that acquires title to a restaurant site through foreclosure or similar proceedings may be restricted in the use of the site or may be unable to succeed to the rights of the franchisee under the related franchise agreement.  The transferability of a franchise may be subject to other restrictions.  Also, federal and state franchise regulations may impose additional risk, including the risk that the transfer of a franchise acquired

46

through foreclosure or similar proceedings may require registration with governmental authorities or disclosure to prospective transferees.

Manufactured Housing Communities, Mobile Home Parks and Recreational Vehicle Parks.  Manufactured housing communities and mobile home parks consist of land that is divided into “spaces” or “home sites” that are primarily leased to owners of the individual mobile homes or other housing units.  The home owner often invests in site-specific improvements such as carports, steps, fencing, skirts around the base of the home, and landscaping.  The land owner typically provides private roads within the park, common facilities and, in many cases, utilities.  In general, the individual mobile homes and other housing units will not constitute material collateral for a mortgage loan underlying a series of offered certificates.

Recreational vehicle parks lease spaces primarily or exclusively for motor homes, travel trailers and portable truck campers, primarily designed for recreational, camping or travel use.  Some manufactured housing community properties are either recreational vehicle resorts or have a significant portion of the properties that are intended for short-term recreational vehicle hook-ups, and tenancy of these communities may vary significantly by season.  This seasonality may cause periodic fluctuations in revenues, tenancy levels, rental rates and operating expenses for these properties.  In general, parks that lease recreational vehicle spaces can be viewed as having a less stable tenant population than parks occupied predominantly by mobile homes.

Factors affecting the successful operation of a manufactured housing community, mobile home park or recreational vehicle park include:

● location of the manufactured housing property;

● the ability of management to provide adequate maintenance and insurance;

● the number of comparable competing properties in the local market;

● the age, appearance, condition and reputation of the property;

● whether the property is subject to any age restrictions on tenants;

● the quality of management; and

● the types of facilities and services it provides.

Manufactured housing communities and mobile home parks also compete against alternative forms of residential housing, including—

● multifamily rental properties,

● cooperatively-owned apartment buildings,

● condominium complexes, and

● single-family residential developments.

Recreational vehicle parks also compete against alternative forms of recreation and short-term lodging, such as staying at a hotel at the beach.

Manufactured housing communities, mobile home parks and recreational vehicle parks have few improvements (which are highly specialized) and are “special purpose” properties that could not be readily

47

converted to general residential, retail or office use.  This will adversely affect the liquidation value of the property if its operation as a manufactured housing community, mobile home park or recreational vehicle park, as the case may be, becomes unprofitable due to competition, age of the improvements or other factors.

Some states regulate the relationship of an owner of a manufactured housing community or mobile home park and its tenants in a manner similar to the way they regulate the relationship between a landlord and tenant at a multifamily rental property.  In addition, some states also regulate changes in the use of a manufactured housing community or mobile home park and require that the owner give written notice to its tenants a substantial period of time prior to the projected change.

In addition to state regulation of the landlord-tenant relationship, numerous counties and municipalities impose rent control and/or rent stabilization on manufactured housing communities and mobile home parks.  These ordinances may limit rent increases to—

● fixed percentages,

● percentages of increases in the consumer price index,

● increases set or approved by a governmental agency, or

● increases determined through mediation or binding arbitration.

In many cases, the rent control or rent stabilization laws either do not permit vacancy decontrol or permit vacancy decontrol only in the relatively rare event that the mobile home or manufactured housing unit is removed from the homesite.  Local authority to impose rent control or rent stabilization on manufactured housing communities and mobile home parks is pre-empted by state law in some states and rent control or rent stabilization is not imposed at the state level in those states.  In some states, however, local rent control and/or rent stabilization ordinances are not pre-empted for tenants having short-term or month-to-month leases, and properties there may be subject to various forms of rent control or rent stabilization with respect to those tenants.

Recreational and Resort Properties.  Any mortgage loan underlying a series of offered certificates may be secured by a golf course, marina, ski resort, amusement park or other property used for recreational purposes or as a resort.  Factors affecting the economic performance of a property of this type include:

● the location and appearance of the property;

● the appeal of the recreational activities offered;

● the existence or construction of competing properties, whether or not they offer the same activities;

● the need to make capital expenditures to maintain, refurbish, improve and/or expand facilities in order to attract potential patrons;

● geographic location and dependence on tourism;

● changes in travel patterns caused by changes in energy prices, strikes, location of highways, construction of additional highways and similar factors;

● seasonality of the business, which may cause periodic fluctuations in operating revenues and expenses;

48

● sensitivity to weather and climate changes; and

● local, regional and national economic conditions.

A marina or other recreational or resort property located next to water will also be affected by various statutes and government regulations that govern the use of, and construction on, rivers, lakes and other waterways.

Because of the nature of the business, recreational and resort properties tend to respond to adverse economic conditions more quickly than do many other types of commercial properties.  In addition, some recreational and resort properties may be adversely affected by prolonged unfavorable weather conditions.

Recreational and resort properties are generally special purpose properties that are not readily convertible to alternative uses.  This will adversely affect their liquidation value.

Arenas and Stadiums.  The success of an arena or stadium generally depends on its ability to attract patrons to a variety of events, including:

● sporting events;

● musical events;

● theatrical events;

● animal shows; and/or

● circuses.

The ability to attract patrons is dependent on, among others, the following factors:

● the appeal of the particular event;

● the cost of admission;

● perceptions by prospective patrons of the safety, convenience, services and attractiveness of the arena or stadium;

● perceptions by prospective patrons of the safety of the surrounding area; and

● the alternative forms of entertainment available in the particular locale.

In some cases, an arena’s or stadium’s success will depend on its ability to attract and keep a sporting team as a tenant.  An arena or stadium may become unprofitable, or unacceptable to a tenant of that type, due to decreased attendance, competition and age of improvements.  Often, substantial expenditures must be made to modernize, refurbish and/or maintain existing facilities.

Arenas and stadiums are special purpose properties which cannot be readily convertible to alternative uses.  This will adversely affect their liquidation value.

Charitable Organizations.  Charitable organizations and other non-profit tenants generally depend on donations from individuals and government grants and subsidies to meet expenses (including rent) and pay for maintenance and capital expenditures.  The extent of those donations is dependent on the extent to which

49

individuals are prepared to make donations, which is influenced by a variety of social, political and economic factors, and whether the governmental grants and subsidies will continue with respect to any such institution.  Donations may be adversely affected by economic conditions, whether local, regional or national.  A reduction in donations, government grants or subsidies may impact the ability of the related institution to pay rent and there can be no assurance that a borrower leasing to a charitable organization or other non-profit tenant will be in a position to meet its obligations under the related mortgage loan documents if such tenant fails to pay.

Churches and Other Religious Facilities.  Churches and other religious facilities generally depend on charitable donations to meet expenses and pay for maintenance and capital expenditures.  The extent of those donations is dependent on the attendance at any particular religious facility and the extent to which attendees are prepared to make donations, which is influenced by a variety of social, political and economic factors.  Donations may be adversely affected by economic conditions, whether local, regional or national.  Religious facilities are often located in special purpose properties that are not readily convertible to alternative uses.  This will adversely affect their liquidation value.

Private Schools and Other Cultural and Educational Institutions.  The cash flows generated from private schools and other cultural and educational institutions are generally dependent on student enrollment or other attendance and the ability of such students or attendees to pay tuition and related fees, which, in some cases, is dependent on the ability to obtain financial aid or loans.  Enrollment and/or attendance at a private school or cultural and educational institution may decrease due to, among other factors:

● changing local demographics;

● competition from other schools or cultural and educational institutions;

● increases in tuition and/or reductions in availability of student loans, government grants or scholarships; and

● reductions in education spending as a result of changes in economic conditions in the area of the school or cultural and educational institution; and poor performance by teachers, administrative staff or students; or mismanagement at the private school or cultural and educational institution.

Parking Lots and Garages.  The primary source of income for parking lots and garages is the rental fees charged for parking spaces.  Factors affecting the success of a parking lot or garage include:

● the number of rentable parking spaces and rates charged;

● the location of the lot or garage and, in particular, its proximity to places where large numbers of people work, shop or live;

● the amount of alternative parking spaces in the area;

● the availability of mass transit; and

● the perceptions of the safety, convenience and services of the lot or garage.

Unimproved Land.  The value of unimproved land is largely a function of its potential use.  This may depend on—

● its location,

● its size,

50

● the surrounding neighborhood, and

● local zoning laws.

Any Analysis of the Value or Income Producing Ability of a Commercial or Multifamily Property Is Highly Subjective and Subject to Error

Mortgage loans secured by liens on income-producing properties are substantially different from mortgage loans made on the security of owner-occupied single-family homes.  The repayment of a loan secured by a lien on an income-producing property is typically dependent upon—

● the successful operation of the property, and

● its ability to generate income sufficient to make payments on the loan.

This is particularly true because most or all of the mortgage loans underlying the offered certificates will be nonrecourse loans.

The debt service coverage ratio of a multifamily or commercial mortgage loan is an important measure of the likelihood of default on the loan.  In general, the debt service coverage ratio of a multifamily or commercial mortgage loan at any given time is the ratio of—

● the amount of income derived or expected to be derived from the related real property collateral for a twelve-month period that is available to pay debt service on the subject mortgage loan, to

● the annualized payments of principal and/or interest on the subject mortgage loan and any other senior and/or pari passu loans that are secured by the related real property collateral.

The amount described in the first bullet point of the preceding sentence is often a highly subjective number based on a variety of assumptions regarding, and adjustments to, revenues and expenses with respect to the related real property.  We will provide a more detailed discussion of its calculation in the related prospectus supplement.

The cash flow generated by a multifamily or commercial property will generally fluctuate over time and may or may not be sufficient to—

● make the loan payments on the related mortgage loan,

● cover operating expenses, and

● fund capital improvements at any given time.

Operating revenues of a nonowner occupied, income-producing property may be affected by the condition of the applicable real estate market and/or area economy.  Properties leased, occupied or used on a short-term basis, such as—

● some health care-related facilities,

● hotels and motels,

● recreational vehicle parks, and

● mini-warehouse and self-storage facilities,

51

tend to be affected more rapidly by changes in market or business conditions than do properties typically leased for longer periods, such as—

● warehouses,

● retail stores,

● office buildings, and

● industrial facilities.

Some commercial properties may be owner-occupied or leased to a small number of tenants.  Accordingly, the operating revenues may depend substantially on the financial condition of the borrower or one or a few tenants.  Mortgage loans secured by liens on owner-occupied and single tenant properties may pose a greater likelihood of default and loss than loans secured by liens on multifamily properties or on multi-tenant commercial properties.

Increases in property operating expenses can increase the likelihood of a borrower default on a multifamily or commercial mortgage loan secured by the property.  Increases in property operating expenses may result from:

● increases in energy costs and labor costs;

● increases in interest rates and real estate tax rates; and

● changes in governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies.

Some net leases of commercial properties may provide that the lessee, rather than the borrower/ landlord, is responsible for payment of operating expenses.  However, a net lease will result in stable net operating income to the borrower/landlord only if the lessee is able to pay the increased operating expense while also continuing to make rent payments.

Lenders also look to the loan-to-value ratio of a mortgage loan as a factor in evaluating the likelihood of loss if a property is liquidated following a default.  In general, the loan-to-value ratio of a multifamily or commercial mortgage loan at any given time is the ratio, expressed as a percentage, of—

● the then outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loan and any other senior and/or pari passu loans that are secured by the related real property collateral, to

● the estimated value of the related real property based on an appraisal, a cash flow analysis, a recent sales price or another method or benchmark of valuation.

A low loan-to-value ratio means the borrower has a large amount of its own equity in the multifamily or commercial property that secures its loan.  In these circumstances—

● the borrower has a greater incentive to perform under the terms of the related mortgage loan in order to protect that equity, and

● the lender has greater protection against loss on liquidation following a borrower default.

However, loan-to-value ratios are not necessarily an accurate measure of the likelihood of liquidation loss in a pool of multifamily and commercial mortgage loans.  For example, the value of a multifamily or commercial

52

property as of the date of initial issuance of a series of offered certificates may be less than the estimated value determined at loan origination.  The value of any real property, in particular a multifamily or commercial property, will likely fluctuate from time to time.  Moreover, even a current appraisal is not necessarily a reliable estimate of value.  Appraised values of income-producing properties are generally based on—

● the market comparison method, which takes into account the recent resale value of comparable properties at the date of the appraisal;

● the cost replacement method, which takes into account the cost of replacing the property at the date of the appraisal;

● the income capitalization method, which takes into account the property’s projected net cash flow; or

● a selection from the values derived from the foregoing methods.

Each of these appraisal methods presents analytical difficulties.  For example—

● it is often difficult to find truly comparable properties that have recently been sold;

● the replacement cost of a property may have little to do with its current market value; and

● income capitalization is inherently based on inexact projections of income and expense and the selection of an appropriate capitalization rate and discount rate.

If more than one appraisal method is used and significantly different results are produced, an accurate determination of value and, correspondingly, a reliable analysis of the likelihood of default and loss, is even more difficult.

The value of a multifamily or commercial property will be affected by property performance.  As a result, if a multifamily or commercial mortgage loan defaults because the income generated by the related property is insufficient to pay operating costs and expenses as well as debt service, then the value of the property will decline and a liquidation loss may occur.

See “—Repayment of a Commercial or Multifamily Mortgage Loan Depends on the Performance and Value of the Underlying Real Property, Which May Decline Over Time, and the Related Borrower’s Ability to Refinance the Property, of Which There Is No Assurance” above.

Borrower Concentration Within a Trust Exposes Investors to Greater Risk of Default and Loss

A particular borrower or group of related borrowers may be associated with multiple real properties securing the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates.  The bankruptcy or insolvency of, or other financial problems with respect to, that borrower or group of borrowers could have an adverse effect on—

● the operation of all of the related real properties, and

● the ability of those properties to produce sufficient cash flow to make required payments on the related mortgage loans.

For example, if a borrower or group of related borrowers that owns or controls several real properties experiences financial difficulty at one of those properties, it could defer maintenance at another of those properties in order to satisfy current expenses with respect to the first property.  That borrower or group of related borrowers could also

53

attempt to avert foreclosure by filing a bankruptcy petition that might have the effect of interrupting debt service payments on all the related mortgage loans for an indefinite period.  In addition, multiple real properties owned by the same borrower or related borrowers are likely to have common management.  This would increase the risk that financial or other difficulties experienced by the property manager could have a greater impact on the owner of the related loans.

Loan Concentration Within a Trust Exposes Investors to Greater Risk of Default and Loss

Any of the mortgage assets in one of our trusts may be substantially larger than the other assets in that trust.  In general, the inclusion in a trust of one or more mortgage assets that have outstanding principal balances that are substantially larger than the other mortgage assets in the trust can result in losses that are more severe, relative to the size of the related mortgage asset pool, than would be the case if the total principal balance of that pool were distributed more evenly.

Geographic Concentration Within a Trust Exposes Investors to Greater Risk of Default and Loss

If a material concentration of mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates is secured by real properties in a particular locale, state or region, then the holders of those certificates will have a greater exposure to:

● any adverse economic developments that occur in the locale, state or region where the properties are located;

● changes in the real estate market where the properties are located;

● changes in governmental rules and fiscal policies in the governmental jurisdiction where the properties are located; and

● acts of nature, including floods, tornadoes and earthquakes, in the areas where properties are located.

Changes in Pool Composition Will Change the Nature of Your Investment

The mortgage loans underlying any series of offered certificates will amortize at different rates and mature on different dates.  In addition, some of those mortgage loans may be prepaid or liquidated.  As a result, the relative composition of the related mortgage asset pool will change over time.

If you purchase offered certificates with a pass-through rate that is equal to or calculated based upon a weighted average of interest rates on the underlying mortgage loans, your pass-through rate will be affected, and may decline, as the relative composition of the mortgage pool changes.

In addition, as payments and other collections of principal are received with respect to the underlying mortgage loans, the remaining mortgage pool backing your offered certificates may exhibit an increased concentration with respect to property type, number and affiliation of borrowers and geographic location.

The Borrower’s Form of Entity May Cause Special Risks and/or Hinder Recovery

Some of the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may have borrowers that are individuals or, alternatively, are entities that either have not been structured to diminish the likelihood of their becoming bankrupt or do not satisfy all the characteristics of special purpose entities.  In general, as a result of a borrower not being a special purpose entity or not being limited to owning the related mortgaged real property, the borrower may be engaged in activities unrelated to the subject mortgaged real property and may incur

54

indebtedness or suffer liabilities with respect to those activities.  Further, some of the borrowing entities may have been in existence and conducting business prior to the origination of the related underlying mortgage loans, may own other property that is not part of the collateral for the related underlying mortgage loans and, further, may not have always satisfied all the characteristics of special purpose entities even if they currently do so.  This could negatively impact the borrower’s financial conditions, and thus its ability to pay amounts due and owing under the subject underlying mortgage loan.  The related mortgage documents and/or organizational documents of those borrowers may not contain the representations, warranties and covenants customarily made by a borrower that is a special purpose entity, such as limitations on indebtedness and affiliate transactions and restrictions on the borrower’s ability to dissolve, liquidate, consolidate, merge, sell all or any material portion of its assets or amend its organizational documents.  These provisions are designed to mitigate the possibility that the borrower’s financial condition would be adversely impacted by factors unrelated to the related mortgaged real property and the related mortgage loan.

Borrowers not structured as bankruptcy-remote entities may be more likely to become insolvent or the subject of a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy proceeding because those borrowers may be:

● operating entities with businesses distinct from the operation of the property with the associated liabilities and risks of operating an ongoing business; and

● individuals that have personal liabilities unrelated to the property.

In addition, if an underlying mortgage loan is secured by a mortgage on both the related borrower’s leasehold interest in the related mortgaged real property and the underlying fee interest in such property, the related borrower may be a special purpose entity, but the owner and pledgor of the related fee interest may not be a special purpose entity.

However, any borrower, even an entity structured to be bankruptcy-remote, as an owner of real estate will be subject to certain potential liabilities and risks.  We cannot assure you that any borrower will not file for bankruptcy protection or that creditors of a borrower or a corporate or individual general partner or managing member of a borrower will not initiate a bankruptcy or similar proceeding against such borrower or corporate or individual general partner or managing member.

With respect to those borrowers that are structured as special purposes entities, although the terms of the borrower’s organizational documents and/or related loan documents require that the related borrower covenants to be a special purpose entity, in some cases those borrowers are not required to observe all covenants and conditions that typically are required in order for such an entity to be viewed under the standard rating agency criteria as a special purpose entity.

In some cases a borrower may be required to have independent directors, managers or trustees in order to mitigate the risk of a voluntary bankruptcy by that borrower even though it is solvent.  However, any director, manager or trustee, even one that is otherwise independent of the applicable borrower and its parent entity, may determine in the exercise of its fiduciary duties to the applicable borrower that a bankruptcy filing is an appropriate course of action to be taken by the applicable borrower.  Such determination might take into account the interests and financial condition of affiliates of the applicable borrower, including its parent entity.  Accordingly, the financial distress of an affiliate of the borrower on any mortgage loan in one of our trusts might increase the likelihood of a bankruptcy filing by that borrower.

Furthermore, with respect to any related borrowers, creditors of a common parent in bankruptcy may seek to consolidate the assets of such borrowers with those of the parent.  Consolidation of the assets of such borrowers would likely have an adverse effect on the funds available to make distributions on your offered certificates, and may lead to a downgrade, withdrawal or qualification of the ratings of your offered certificates.  See “—Borrower

55

Bankruptcy Proceedings Can Delay and Impair Recovery on a Mortgage Loan Underlying Your Offered Certificates” below and “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Issues.”

The mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may have borrowers that own the related mortgaged real properties as tenants-in-common or may permit the related borrowers to convert into a tenant-in-common structure in the future.  Generally, in tenant-in-common ownership structures, each tenant-in-common owns an undivided share in the subject real property.  If a tenant-in-common desires to sell its interest in the subject real property and is unable to find a buyer or otherwise desires to force a partition, the tenant-in-common has the ability to request that a court order a sale of the subject real property and distribute the proceeds to each tenant-in-common owner proportionally.  To reduce the likelihood of a partition action, a tenant-in-common borrower may be required to waive its partition right.  However, there can be no assurance that, if challenged, this waiver would be enforceable or that it would be enforced in a bankruptcy proceeding.

The enforcement of remedies against tenant-in-common borrowers may be prolonged because each time a tenant-in-common borrower files for bankruptcy, the bankruptcy court stay is reinstated.  While a lender may seek to mitigate this risk after the commencement of the first bankruptcy of a tenant-in-common by commencing an involuntary proceeding against the other tenant-in-common borrowers and moving to consolidate all those cases, there can be no assurance that a bankruptcy court would consolidate those separate cases.  Additionally, tenant-in-common borrowers may be permitted to transfer portions of their interests in the subject mortgaged real property to numerous additional tenant-in-common borrowers.

The bankruptcy, dissolution or action for partition by one or more of the tenants-in-common could result in an early repayment of the related mortgage loan, a significant delay in recovery against the tenant-in-common borrowers, a material impairment in property management and a substantial decrease in the amount recoverable upon the related mortgage loan.  Not all tenants-in-common for these mortgage loans may be special purpose entities and some of those tenants-in-common may be individuals.

Borrower Bankruptcy Proceedings Can Delay and Impair Recovery on a Mortgage Loan Underlying Your Offered Certificates

Under federal bankruptcy law, the filing of a petition in bankruptcy by or against a borrower will stay the sale of a real property owned by that borrower, as well as the commencement or continuation of a foreclosure action.

In addition, if a court determines that the value of a real property is less than the principal balance of the mortgage loan it secures, the court may reduce the amount of secured indebtedness to the then-value of the property.  This would make the lender a general unsecured creditor for the difference between the then-value of the property and the amount of its outstanding mortgage indebtedness.

A bankruptcy court also may:

● grant a debtor a reasonable time to cure a payment default on a mortgage loan;

● reduce monthly payments due under a mortgage loan;

● change the rate of interest due on a mortgage loan; or

● otherwise alter a mortgage loan’s repayment schedule.

Furthermore, the borrower, as debtor-in-possession, or its bankruptcy trustee has special powers to avoid, subordinate or disallow debts.  In some circumstances, the claims of a secured lender, such as one of our trusts, may be subordinated to financing obtained by a debtor-in-possession subsequent to its bankruptcy.

56

Under federal bankruptcy law, a lender may be stayed from enforcing a borrower’s assignment of rents and leases. Federal bankruptcy law also may interfere with a lender’s ability to enforce lockbox requirements.  The legal proceedings necessary to resolve these issues can be time consuming and may significantly delay the receipt of rents.  Rents also may escape an assignment to the extent they are used by borrower to maintain its property or for other court authorized expenses.

As a result of the foregoing, the related trust’s recovery with respect to borrowers in bankruptcy proceedings may be significantly delayed, and the total amount ultimately collected may be substantially less than the amount owed.

Environmental Liabilities Will Adversely Affect the Value and Operation of the Contaminated Property and May Deter a Lender from Foreclosing

There can be no assurance—

● as to the degree of environmental testing conducted at any of the real properties securing the mortgage loans that back your offered certificates;

● that the environmental testing conducted by or on behalf of the applicable originators or any other parties in connection with the origination of those mortgage loans or otherwise identified all adverse environmental conditions and risks at the related real properties;

● that the results of the environmental testing were accurately evaluated in all cases;

● that the related borrowers have implemented or will implement all operations and maintenance plans and other remedial actions recommended by any environmental consultant that may have conducted testing at the related real properties; or

● that the recommended action will fully remediate or otherwise address all the identified adverse environmental conditions and risks.

Environmental site assessments vary considerably in their content, quality and cost.  Even when adhering to good professional practices, environmental consultants will sometimes not detect significant environmental problems because to do an exhaustive environmental assessment would be far too costly and time-consuming to be practical.

In addition, the current environmental condition of a real property securing a mortgage loan underlying your offered certificates could be adversely affected by—

● tenants at the property, such as gasoline stations or dry cleaners, or

● conditions or operations in the vicinity of the property, such as leaking underground storage tanks at another property nearby.

Various environmental laws may make a current or previous owner or operator of real property liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or adjacent to the property.  Those laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of the hazardous or toxic substances.  For example, there are laws that impose liability for release of asbestos containing materials into the air or require the removal or containment of the materials.  The owner’s liability for any required remediation generally is unlimited and could exceed the value of the property and/or the total assets of the owner.  In addition, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances, or the failure to remediate the adverse environmental condition, may adversely affect the owner’s or operator’s ability to use the affected property.  In

57

some states, contamination of a property may give rise to a lien on the property to ensure the costs of cleanup.  Depending on the state, this lien may have priority over the lien of an existing mortgage, deed of trust or other security instrument.  In addition, third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real property for personal injury associated with exposure to hazardous substances, including asbestos and lead-based paint.  Persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of the substances at the disposal or treatment facility.

The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, as well as other federal and state laws, provide that a secured lender, such as one of our trusts, may be liable as an “owner” or “operator” of the real property, regardless of whether the borrower or a previous owner caused the environmental damage, if—

● agents or employees of the lender are deemed to have participated in the management of the borrower, or

● the lender actually takes possession of a borrower’s property or control of its day-to-day operations, including through the appointment of a receiver or foreclosure.

Although recently enacted legislation clarifies the activities in which a lender may engage without becoming subject to liability under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, and similar federal laws, that legislation has no applicability to state environmental laws.  Moreover, future laws, ordinances or regulations could impose material environmental liability.

Federal law requires owners of residential housing constructed prior to 1978—

● to disclose to potential residents or purchasers information in their possession regarding the presence of known lead-based paint or lead-based paint-related hazards in such housing, and

● to deliver to potential residents or purchasers a United States Environmental Protection Agency approved information pamphlet describing the potential hazards to pregnant women and young children, including that the ingestion of lead-based paint chips and/or the inhalation of dust particles from lead-based paint by children can cause permanent injury, even at low levels of exposure.

Property owners may be liable for injuries to their tenants resulting from exposure under various laws that impose affirmative obligations on property owners of residential housing containing lead-based paint.

Lending on Condominium Units Creates Risks for Lenders That Are Not Present When Lending on Non-Condominiums

Some mortgage loans underlying the offered certificates will be secured by—

● the related borrower’s interest in a commercial condominium unit or multiple units in a residential condominium project, and

● the related voting rights in the owners’ association for the subject building, development or project.

Condominiums may create risks for lenders that are not present when lending on properties that are not condominiums.  In the case of condominiums, a condominium owner is generally responsible for the payment of common area maintenance charges. In the event those charges are not paid when due, the condominium

58

association may have a lien for those unpaid charges against the owner of the subject condominium unit, and, in some cases, pursuant to the condominium declaration, the lien of the mortgage for a related mortgage loan is subordinate to that lien for unpaid common area maintenance charges. In addition, pursuant to many condominium declarations, the holders of the remaining units would become responsible for the common area maintenance charges that remain unpaid by any particular unit holder.

Further, in the case of condominiums, a board of managers generally has discretion to make decisions affecting the condominium building and there is no assurance that the borrower under a mortgage loan secured by one or more interests in that condominium will have any control over decisions made by the related board of managers.  Thus, decisions made by that board of managers, including regarding assessments to be paid by the unit owners, insurance to be maintained on the condominium building, restoration following a casualty and many other decisions affecting the maintenance of that building, may not be consistent with the mortgage loan documents and may have an adverse impact on the mortgage loans that are secured by real properties consisting of such condominium interests.

There can be no assurance that the related board of managers will act in the best interests of the borrower under those mortgage loans. Further, because of the nature of condominiums, a default on the part of the borrower with respect to such real properties will not allow the special servicer the same flexibility in realizing on the collateral as is generally available with respect to commercial properties that are not condominiums. The rights of other unit owners, the documents governing the management of the condominium units and the state and local laws applicable to condominium units must be considered. In addition, in the event of a casualty with respect to the subject real property, because of the possible existence of multiple loss payees on any insurance policy covering the property, there could be a delay in the restoration of the property and/or the allocation of related insurance proceeds, if any. Consequently, if any of the mortgage loans underlying the offered certificates are secured by the related borrower’s interest in a condominium, servicing and realizing upon such mortgage loan could subject the holders of such offered certificates to a greater delay, expense and risk than with respect to a mortgage loan secured by a commercial property that is not a condominium.

Lending on Ground Leases Creates Risks for Lenders That Are Not Present When Lending on an Actual Ownership Interest in a Real Property

For purposes of each prospectus supplement, unless otherwise indicated therein, the encumbered interest will be characterized as a “fee interest” if (i) the borrower has a fee interest in all or substantially all of the mortgaged property (provided that if the borrower has a leasehold interest in any portion of the mortgaged property, such portion is not, individually or in the aggregate, material to the use or operation of the mortgaged property), or (ii) the mortgage loan is secured by the borrower’s leasehold interest in the mortgaged property as well as the borrower’s (or other fee owner’s) overlapping fee interest in the related mortgaged property.

Leasehold mortgage loans are subject to certain risks not associated with mortgage loans secured by a lien on the fee estate of the borrower.  The most significant of these risks is that if the related borrower’s leasehold were to be terminated upon a lease default, the lender would lose its security in the leasehold interest.  Generally, each related ground lease or a lessor estoppel requires the lessor to give the lender notice of the borrower’s defaults under the ground lease and an opportunity to cure them, permits the leasehold interest to be assigned to the lender or the purchaser at a foreclosure sale, in some cases only upon the consent of the lessor, and contains certain other protective provisions typically included in a “mortgageable” ground lease, although not all these protective provisions are included in each case.  If the ground lease does not provide for notice to a lender of a default thereunder on the part of the borrower, together with a reasonable opportunity for the lender to cure the default, the lender may be unable to prevent termination of the lease and may lose its collateral.

Upon the bankruptcy of a lessor or a lessee under a ground lease, the debtor has the right to assume or reject the lease.  If a debtor lessor rejects the lease, the lessee has the right pursuant to Section 365(h) of the U.S. bankruptcy code (11 U.S.C. Section 365(h)) to treat such lease as terminated by rejection or remain in possession

59

of its leased premises for the rent otherwise payable under the lease for the remaining term of the ground lease (including renewals) and to offset against such rent any damages incurred due to the landlord’s failure to perform its obligations under the lease.  If a debtor lessee/borrower rejects any or all of the lease, the leasehold lender could succeed to the lessee/borrower’s position under the lease only if the lease specifically grants the lender such right.  If both the lessor and the lessee/borrower are involved in bankruptcy proceedings, the issuing entity or the trustee on its behalf may be unable to enforce the bankrupt lessee/borrower’s pre-petition agreement to refuse to treat a ground lease rejected by a bankrupt lessor as terminated.  In such circumstances, a ground lease could be terminated and the trustee could be deprived of its security interest in the leasehold estate, notwithstanding lender protection provisions contained in the ground lease or in the mortgage.

Some of the ground leases securing the mortgage loans may provide that the ground rent payable under the related ground lease increases during the term of the mortgage loan.  These increases may adversely affect the cash flow and net income of the related borrower.

A leasehold lender could lose its security unless (i) the leasehold lender holds a fee mortgage, (ii) the ground lease requires the lessor to enter into a new lease with the leasehold lender upon termination or rejection of the ground lease, or (iii) the bankruptcy court, as a court of equity, allows the leasehold lender to assume the ground lessee’s obligations under the ground lease and succeed to the ground lessee’s position.  Although not directly covered by the 1994 Amendments to the U.S. bankruptcy code, such a result would be consistent with the purpose of the 1994 Amendments to the U.S. bankruptcy code granting the holders of leasehold mortgages permitted under the terms of the lease the right to succeed to the position of a leasehold mortgagor.  Although consistent with the U.S. bankruptcy code, such position may not be adopted by the applicable bankruptcy court.

Further, in a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (Precision Indus. v. Qualitech Steel SBQ, LLC, 327 F.3d 537 (7th Cir. 2003)) the court ruled with respect to an unrecorded lease of real property that where a statutory sale of the fee interest in leased property occurs under Section 363(f) of the U.S. bankruptcy code (11 U.S.C. Section 363(f)) upon the bankruptcy of a landlord, such sale terminates a lessee’s possessory interest in the property, and the purchaser assumes title free and clear of any interest, including any leasehold estates.  Pursuant to Section 363(e) of the U.S. bankruptcy code (11 U.S.C. Section 363(a)), a lessee may request the bankruptcy court to prohibit or condition the statutory sale of the property so as to provide adequate protection of the leasehold interest; however, the court ruled that this provision does not ensure continued possession of the property, but rather entitles the lessee to compensation for the value of its leasehold interest, typically from the sale proceeds.  While there are certain circumstances under which a “free and clear” sale under Section 363(f) of the U.S. bankruptcy code would not be authorized (including that the lessee could not be compelled in a legal or equitable proceeding to accept a monetary satisfaction of his possessory interest, and that none of the other conditions of Section 363(f)(1) through (4) of the U.S. bankruptcy code otherwise permits the sale), we cannot assure you that those circumstances would be present in any proposed sale of a leased premises.  As a result, we cannot assure you that, in the event of a statutory sale of leased property pursuant to Section 363(f) of the U.S. bankruptcy code, the lessee will be able to maintain possession of the property under the ground lease.  In addition, we cannot assure you that the lessee and/or the lender will be able to recoup the full value of the leasehold interest in bankruptcy court.  Most of the ground leases contain standard protections typically obtained by securitization lenders, however, certain of the ground leases with respect to a mortgage loan included in a trust fund may not.

With respect to certain of the mortgage loans included in one of our trusts, the related borrower may have given to certain lessors under the related ground lease a right of first refusal in the event a sale is contemplated or an option to purchase all or a portion of the mortgaged property and these provisions, if not waived, may impede the mortgagee’s ability to sell the related mortgaged property at foreclosure or adversely affect the foreclosure process.

See “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Issues” in this prospectus.

60

Leased Fee Properties Have Special Risks

Land subject to a ground lease presents special risks.  In such cases, where the borrower owns the fee interest but not the related improvements, such borrower will only receive the rental income from the ground lease and not from the operation of any related improvements.  Any default by the ground lessee would adversely affect the borrower’s ability to make payments on the related mortgage loan.  While ground leases may contain certain restrictions on the use and operation of the related mortgaged property, the ground lessee generally enjoys the rights and privileges of a fee owner, including the right to construct, alter and remove improvements and fixtures from the land and to assign and sublet the ground leasehold interest.  However, the borrower has the same risk of interruptions in cash flow if such ground lessee defaults under its lease as it would on another single tenant commercial property, without the control over the premises that it would ordinarily have as landlord.  In addition, in the event of a condemnation, the borrower would only be entitled to an allocable share of the condemnation proceeds.  Furthermore, the insurance requirements are often governed by the terms of the ground lease and, in some cases, certain subtenants may be allowed to self-insure.  The ground lessee is commonly permitted to mortgage its ground leasehold interest, and the leasehold lender will often have notice and cure rights with respect to material defaults under the ground lease.  In addition, leased fee interests are less frequently purchased and sold than other interests in commercial real property.  It may be difficult for the issuing entity, if it became a foreclosing lender, to sell the fee interests if the tenant and its improvements remain on the land.  In addition, if the improvements are nearing the end of their useful life, there could be a risk that the tenant defaults in lieu of performing any obligations it may otherwise have to raze the structure and return the land in raw form to the developer.  Furthermore, leased fee interests are generally subject to the same risks associated with the property type for which the ground lessee operates the premises because that use is likely a significant source of revenue for the payment of ground rent.

Some Provisions in the Mortgage Loans Underlying Your Offered Certificates May Be Challenged as Being Unenforceable

Cross-Collateralization Arrangements.  It may be possible to challenge cross-collateralization arrangements involving more than one borrower as a fraudulent conveyance, even if the borrowers are related.  If one of those borrowers were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case, creditors of the bankrupt party or the representative of the bankruptcy estate of the bankrupt party could seek to have the bankruptcy court avoid any lien granted by the bankrupt party to secure repayment of another borrower’s loan.  In order to do so, the court would have to determine that—

● the bankrupt party—

1. was insolvent at the time of granting the lien,

2. was rendered insolvent by the granting of the lien,

3. was left with inadequate capital, or

4. was not able to pay its debts as they matured; and

● the bankrupt party did not, when it allowed its property to be encumbered by a lien securing the other borrower’s loan, receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value for pledging its property for the equal benefit of the other borrower.

If the court were to conclude that the granting of the lien was an avoidable fraudulent conveyance, it could nullify the lien or security instrument effecting the cross-collateralization.  The court could also allow the bankrupt party to recover payments it made under the avoided cross-collateralization.

61

Prepayment Premiums, Fees and Charges.  Under federal bankruptcy law and the laws of a number of states, the enforceability of any mortgage loan provisions that require prepayment lockout periods or payment of a yield maintenance charge or a prepayment premium, fee or charge upon an involuntary or a voluntary prepayment, is unclear.  Provisions requiring yield maintenance charges or prepayment premiums, fees or charges also may be interpreted as constituting the collection of interest for usury purposes.  Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the obligation to pay a yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium, fee or charge will be enforceable.  In addition, if provisions requiring yield maintenance charges or prepayment premiums, fees or charges upon involuntary prepayment were unenforceable, borrowers would have an incentive to default in order to prepay their loans.  Also, we cannot assure you that foreclosure proceeds will be sufficient to pay an enforceable yield maintenance charge or prepayment premium, fee or charge.

Due-on-Sale and Debt Acceleration Clauses.  Some or all of the mortgage loans included in one of our trusts may contain a due-on-sale clause, which permits the lender, with some exceptions, to accelerate the maturity of the mortgage loan upon the sale, transfer or conveyance of—

● the related real property, or

● a majority ownership interest in the related borrower.

We anticipate that all of the mortgage loans included in one of our trusts will contain some form of debt-acceleration clause, which permits the lender to accelerate the debt upon specified monetary or non-monetary defaults by the related borrower.

The courts of all states will enforce acceleration clauses in the event of a material payment default.  The equity courts of any state, however, may refuse to allow the foreclosure of a mortgage, deed of trust or other security instrument or to permit the acceleration of the indebtedness if:

●           the default is deemed to be immaterial,

●           the exercise of those remedies would be inequitable or unjust, or

●           the circumstances would render the acceleration unconscionable.

See “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Due-on-Sale and Due-on-Encumbrance Provisions” below in this prospectus.

Assignments of Leases.  Some or all of the mortgage loans included in one of our trusts may be secured by, among other things, an assignment of leases and rents.  Under that document, the related borrower will assign its right, title and interest as landlord under the leases on the related real property and the income derived from those leases to the lender as further security for the related mortgage loan, while retaining a license to collect rents for so long as there is no default.  In the event the borrower defaults, the license terminates and the lender is entitled to collect rents.  In some cases, those assignments may not be perfected as security interests prior to actual possession of the cash flow.  Accordingly, state law may require that the lender take possession of the property and obtain a judicial appointment of a receiver before becoming entitled to collect the rents.  Lenders that actually take possession of the property, however, may incur potentially substantial risks attendant to being a mortgagee in possession. The risks include liability for environmental clean up costs and other risks inherent to property ownership.  In addition, the commencement of bankruptcy or similar proceedings by or with respect to the borrower will adversely affect the lender’s ability to collect the rents.  See “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Issues.”

Defeasance.  A mortgage loan underlying a series of offered certificates may permit the related borrower, during the periods specified and subject to the conditions set forth in the loan, to pledge to the holder of the mortgage loan a specified amount of direct, non-callable United States government securities and thereby obtain a release of the related mortgaged property.  The cash amount which a borrower must expend to purchase, or must

62

deliver to a master servicer in order for the master servicer to purchase, the required United States government securities may be in excess of the principal balance of the mortgage loan.  A court could interpret that excess amount as a form of prepayment premium or could take it into account for usury purposes.  In some states, some forms of prepayment premiums are unenforceable.  If the payment of that excess amount were held to be unenforceable, the remaining portion of the cash amount to be delivered may be insufficient to purchase the requisite amount of United States government securities.

Jurisdictions With One Action or Security First Rules and/or Anti-Deficiency Legislation May Limit the Ability of the Special Servicer to Foreclose on a Real Property or to Realize on Obligations Secured by a Real Property

Several states, including California, have laws that prohibit more than one “judicial action” to enforce a mortgage obligation, requiring the lender to exhaust the real property security for such obligation first and/or limiting the ability of the lender to recover a deficiency judgment from the obligor following the lender’s realization upon the collateral.  This could be particularly problematic for cross-collateralized, cross-defaulted or multi-property mortgage loans secured by real properties located in multiple states where only some of those states have such rules.  A lender who proceeds in violation of these rules may run the risk of forfeiting collateral and/or forfeiting the right to enforce the underlying obligation.  In some jurisdictions, the benefits of such laws may also be available to a guarantor of the underlying obligation, thereby limiting the ability of the lender to recover against a guarantor without first proceeding against the collateral and without a judicial foreclosure. Accordingly, where real properties are located in jurisdictions in which “one action”, “security first” and/or “anti-deficiency” rules may be applicable, the special servicer should seek to obtain advice of counsel prior to enforcing any of the trust’s rights under any of the related mortgage loans and/or guarantees of those mortgage loans.  As a result, the special servicer may incur additional – and perhaps significant additional – delay and expense in foreclosing on the underlying real properties located in states affected by “one action”, “security first” or “anti-deficiency” rules.  See “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Foreclosure—One Action and Security First Rules” and “—Foreclosure—Anti-Deficiency Legislation”.

Additional Secured Debt Increases the Likelihood that a Borrower Will Default on a Mortgage Loan Underlying Your Offered Certificates; Co-Lender, Intercreditor and Similar Agreements May Limit a Mortgage Lender’s Rights

With respect to one or more of the mortgage loans included in one of our trusts, the related borrower may have encumbered, or be permitted to encumber, the related real property collateral with additional secured debt.  In addition, one or more mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may each be part of a loan combination or split loan structure that includes one or more additional mortgage loans — not included in the related trust — that are secured by the same mortgage instrument(s) encumbering the same mortgaged property or properties, as applicable, as is the subject underlying mortgage loan.  See “The Trust Fund—Mortgage Loans—Loan Combinations.”

Even if a mortgage loan prohibits further encumbrance of the related real property, a violation of this prohibition may not become evident until the affected mortgage loan otherwise defaults.  Accordingly, a lender, such as one of our trusts, may not realistically be able to prevent a borrower from incurring additional secured debt.

The existence of any additional secured indebtedness may adversely affect the related borrower’s financial viability and/or the subject trust’s security interest in the related real property collateral.  For example, the existence of additional secured indebtedness increases the difficulty of refinancing a mortgage loan at the loan’s maturity.  In addition, the related borrower may have difficulty repaying multiple loans.  The existence of other debt, secured or otherwise, may also increase the likelihood of a borrower bankruptcy.  Moreover, the filing of a petition in bankruptcy by, or on behalf of, a junior lienholder may stay the senior lienholder from taking

63

action to foreclose out the junior lien.  See “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Subordinate Financing.”

In addition, if any mortgage loan underlying a series of offered certificates is secured by a mortgaged real property encumbered by other mortgage debt, and if that other mortgage debt is not part of the related trust, then the related trust may be subject to a co-lender, intercreditor or similar agreement with the other affected mortgage lenders that, among other things:

● grants any such other mortgage lender cure rights and/or a purchase option with respect to the subject underlying mortgage loan under certain default scenarios or reasonably foreseeable default scenarios;

● limits modifications of the payment terms of the subject underlying mortgage loan; and or

● limits or delays enforcement actions with respect to the subject underlying mortgage loan.

See also “—With Respect to Certain Mortgage Loans Included in Our Trusts, the Mortgaged Property or Properties that Secure the Subject Mortgage Loan in the Trust Also Secure One or More Related Mortgage Loans That Are Not in the Trust; The Interests of the Holders of Those Non-Trust Mortgage Loans May Conflict with Your Interests” below.

With Respect to Certain Mortgage Loans Included in Our Trusts, the Mortgaged Property or Properties that Secure the Subject Mortgage Loan in the Trust Also Secure One or More Related Mortgage Loans That Are Not in the Trust; The Interests of the Holders of Those Non-Trust Mortgage Loans May Conflict with Your Interests.

One or more mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may each be part of a loan combination or split loan structure that includes one or more additional mortgage loans — not included in the related trust — that are secured by the same mortgage instrument(s) encumbering the same mortgaged property or properties, as applicable, as is the subject underlying mortgage loan. See “The Trust Fund—Mortgage Loans—Loan Combinations.” Pursuant to one or more co-lender or similar agreements, a holder of a particular non-trust mortgage loan in a subject loan combination, or a group of holders of non-trust mortgage loans in a subject loan combination (acting together), may be granted various rights and powers that affect the mortgage loan in that loan combination that is in our trust, including (a) cure rights with respect to the mortgage loan in our trust, (b) a purchase option with respect to the mortgage loan in our trust, (c) the right to advise, direct and/or consult with the applicable servicer regarding various servicing matters, including certain modifications, affecting that loan combination, and/or (d) the right to replace the applicable special servicer — without cause — with respect to that loan combination. In some cases, those rights and powers may be assignable or may be exercised through a representative or designee. In connection with exercising any of the foregoing rights afforded to it, the holder of any of the non-trust mortgage loans in a loan combination — or, if applicable, any representative, designee or assignee thereof with respect to the particular right — that includes a mortgage loan in our trust will likely not be an interested party with respect to the related series of certificates, will have no obligation to consider the interests of, or the impact of exercising such rights on, the related series of certificates and may have interests that conflict with your interests. If any such non-trust mortgage loan is included in an unrelated securitization, then the representative, designee or assignee exercising any of the rights of the holder of that non-trust mortgage loan may be a securityholder, an operating advisor, a controlling class representative or other comparable party or a servicer from that other unrelated securitization. You should expect that the holder or beneficial owner of a non-trust mortgage loan will exercise its rights and powers to protect its own economic interests, and will not be liable to the related series of certificateholders for so doing.

In addition, if any mortgage loan included in one of our trusts is part of a loan combination, then that mortgage loan may be serviced and administered pursuant to the servicing agreement for the securitization of a

64

non-trust mortgage loan that is part of the same loan combination.  Consequently, the certificateholders of the related series of certificates would have limited ability to control the servicing of that loan combination and the parties with control over the servicing of that loan combination may have interests that conflict with your interests.  See “Description of the Governing Documents—Servicing Mortgage Loans That Are Part of a Loan Combination.”

Certain Aspects of Co-Lender, Intercreditor and Similar Agreements Executed in Connection with Mortgage Loans Underlying Your Offered Certificates May be Unenforceable

One or more mortgage loans included in one of our trusts may be part of a split loan structure or loan combination that includes a subordinate non-trust mortgage loan or may be senior to one or more other mortgage loans made to a common borrower and secured by the same real property collateral.  Pursuant to a co-lender, intercreditor or similar agreement, a subordinate lender may have agreed that it not take any direct actions with respect to the related subordinated debt, including any actions relating to the bankruptcy of the related borrower, and that the holder of the related mortgage loan that is included in our trust — directly or through an applicable servicer — will have all rights to direct all such actions.  There can be no assurance that in the event of the borrower’s bankruptcy, a court will enforce such restrictions against a subordinate lender.  While subordination agreements are generally enforceable in bankruptcy, in its decision in In re 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership, 246 B.R. 325 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. March 10, 2000), the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois refused to enforce a provision of a subordination agreement that allowed a first mortgagee to vote a second mortgagee’s claim with respect to a Chapter 11 reorganization plan on the grounds that pre-bankruptcy contracts cannot override rights expressly provided by federal bankruptcy law.  This holding, which one court has already followed, potentially limits the ability of a senior lender to accept or reject a reorganization plan or to control the enforcement of remedies against a common borrower over a subordinate lender’s objections.  In the event the foregoing holding is followed with respect to a co-lender relationship related to one of the mortgage loans underlying your offered certificates, the trustee’s recovery with respect to the related borrower in a bankruptcy proceeding may be significantly delayed, and the aggregate amount ultimately collected may be substantially less than the amount owed.

Mezzanine Debt May Reduce the Cash Flow Available to Reinvest in a Mortgaged Real Property and may Increase the Likelihood that a Borrower Will Default on a Mortgage Loan Underlying Your Offered Certificates

In the case of one or more mortgage loans included in one of our trusts, a direct and/or indirect equity holder in the related borrower may have pledged, or be permitted to pledge, its equity interest to secure financing to that equity holder.  Such financing is often referred to as mezzanine debt.  While a lender on mezzanine debt has no security interest in or rights to the related mortgaged real property, a default under the subject mezzanine loan could cause a change in control of the related borrower.

In addition, if, in the case of any mortgage loan underlying a series of offered certificates, equity interests in the related borrower have been pledged to secure mezzanine debt, then the related trust may be subject to an intercreditor or similar agreement that, among other things:

● grants the mezzanine lender cure rights and/or a purchase option with respect to the subject underlying mortgage loan under certain default scenarios or reasonably foreseeable default scenarios;

● limits modifications of payment terms of the subject underlying mortgage loan; and/or

● limits or delays enforcement actions with respect to the subject underlying mortgage loan.

65

Furthermore, mezzanine debt reduces the mezzanine borrower’s indirect equity in the subject mortgaged real property and therefore may reduce its incentive to invest cash in order to support that mortgaged real property.

World Events and Natural Disasters Could Have an Adverse Impact on the Real Properties Securing the Mortgage Loans Underlying Your Offered Certificates and Consequently Could Reduce the Cash Flow Available to Make Payments on the Offered Certificates.

The economic impact of the United States’ military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and other parts of the world, as well as the possibility of any terrorist attacks domestically or abroad, is uncertain, but could have a material effect on general economic conditions, consumer confidence, and market liquidity.  We can give no assurance as to the effect of these events on consumer confidence and the performance of the loans held by the applicable trust fund.  Any adverse impact resulting from these events would be borne by the holders of one or more classes of the affected certificates.  In addition, natural disasters, including earthquakes, floods and hurricanes, also may adversely affect the real properties securing the mortgage loans that back your offered certificates.  For example, real properties located in California may be more susceptible to certain hazards, such as earthquakes or widespread fires, than properties in other parts of the country, and real properties located in coastal states generally may be more susceptible to hurricanes than properties in other parts of the country.  Hurricanes and related windstorms, floods and tornadoes have caused extensive and catastrophic physical damage in and to coastal and inland areas located in the Gulf Coast region of the United States and certain other parts of the southeastern United States.  The underlying mortgage loans do not all require the maintenance of flood insurance for the related real properties.  We cannot assure you that any damage caused by hurricanes, windstorms, floods or tornadoes would be covered by insurance.

Lack of Insurance Coverage Exposes a Trust to Risk for Particular Special Hazard Losses

In general, the standard form of fire and extended coverage policy covers physical damage to or destruction of the improvements of a property by fire, lightning, explosion, smoke, windstorm and hail, subject to the conditions and exclusions specified in the related policy.  Most such insurance policies typically do not cover any physical damage resulting from, among other things:

● war,

● riot, strike and civil commotion,

● terrorism,

● nuclear, biological or chemical materials,

● revolution,

● governmental actions,

● floods and other water-related causes,

● earth movement, including earthquakes, landslides and mudflows,

● wet or dry rot,

● mold,

● vermin, and

66

● domestic animals.

Unless the related mortgage loan documents specifically require the borrower to insure against physical damage arising from these causes, then the resulting losses may be borne by you as a holder of offered certificates.

There is also a possibility of casualty losses on a real property for which insurance proceeds, together with land value, may not be adequate to pay the mortgage loan in full or rebuild the improvements. Consequently, there can be no assurance that each casualty loss incurred with respect to a real property securing one of the mortgage loans included in one of our trusts will be fully covered by insurance or that the mortgage loan will be fully repaid in the event of a casualty.

Furthermore, various forms of insurance maintained with respect to any of the real properties for the mortgage loans included in one of our trusts, including casualty insurance, environmental insurance and earthquake insurance, may be provided under a blanket insurance policy. That blanket insurance policy will also cover other real properties, some of which may not secure loans in that trust. As a result of total limits under any of those blanket policies, losses at other properties covered by the blanket insurance policy may reduce the amount of insurance coverage with respect to a property securing one of the loans in our trust.

Changes in Zoning Laws May Adversely Affect the Use or Value of a Real Property

Due to changes in zoning requirements since construction, an income-producing property may not comply with current zoning laws, including density, use, parking and set back requirements.  Accordingly, the property may be a permitted non-conforming structure or the operation of the property may be a permitted non-conforming use.  This means that the owner is not required to alter the property’s structure or use to comply with the new law, but the owner may be limited in its ability to rebuild the premises “as is” in the event of a substantial casualty loss.  This may adversely affect the cash flow available following the casualty.  If a substantial casualty were to occur, insurance proceeds may not be sufficient to pay a mortgage loan secured by the property in full.  In addition, if the property were repaired or restored in conformity with the current law, its value or revenue-producing potential may be less than that which existed before the casualty.

Redevelopment and Renovation at the Mortgaged Properties May Have Uncertain and Adverse Results

Some mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may be secured by mortgaged real properties that are undergoing or are expected to undergo redevelopment or renovation in the future. There can be no assurance that current or planned redevelopment or renovation will be completed, that such redevelopment or renovation will be completed in the time frame contemplated, or that, when and if redevelopment or renovation is completed, such redevelopment or renovation will improve the operations at, or increase the value of, the subject property. Failure of any of the foregoing to occur could have a material negative impact on the ability of the related borrower to repay the related mortgage loan.

In the event the related borrower fails to pay the costs of work completed or material delivered in connection with such ongoing redevelopment or renovation, the portion of the mortgaged real property on which there are renovations may be subject to mechanic’s or materialmen’s liens that may be senior to the lien of the related mortgage loan.

Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 May Be Expensive

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, all public accommodations are required to meet federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons.  If a property does not currently comply with that Act, the property owner may be required to incur significant costs in order to effect that compliance.  This will reduce the amount of cash flow available to cover other required maintenance and capital improvements and

67

to pay debt service on the mortgage loan(s) that may encumber that property.  There can be no assurance that the owner will have sufficient funds to cover the costs necessary to comply with that Act.  In addition, noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the federal government or an award or damages to private litigants.

Litigation and Other Legal Proceedings May Adversely Affect a Borrower’s Ability to Repay Its Mortgage Loan

From time to time, there may be legal proceedings pending or threatened against the borrowers and their affiliates relating to the business of, or arising out of the ordinary course of business of, the borrowers and their affiliates.  It is possible that those legal proceedings may have a material adverse effect on any borrower’s ability to meet its obligations under the related mortgage loan and, therefore, on distributions on your certificates.

The owner of a multifamily or commercial property may be a defendant in a litigation arising out of, among other things, the following:

● breach of contract involving a tenant, a supplier or other party;

● negligence resulting in a personal injury, or

● responsibility for an environmental problem.

Litigation will divert the owner’s attention from operating its property.  If the litigation were decided adversely to the owner, the award to the plaintiff may adversely affect the owner’s ability to repay a mortgage loan secured by the property.

From time to time, there may be condemnations pending or threatened against one or more of the mortgaged real properties securing the mortgage loans in one of our trusts.  The proceeds payable in connection with a total condemnation may not be sufficient to restore the related mortgaged real property or to satisfy the remaining indebtedness of the related mortgage loan.  The occurrence of a partial condemnation may have a material adverse effect on the continued use of, or income generated by, the affected mortgaged real property.  Therefore, we cannot assure you that the occurrence of any condemnation will not have a negative impact upon distributions on your offered certificates.

Potential Conflicts of Interest Can Affect a Person’s Performance

A master servicer, special servicer or sub-servicer for one of our trusts, or any of their respective affiliates, may purchase certificates evidencing interests in that trust.

In addition, a master servicer, special servicer or sub-servicer for one of our trusts, or any of their respective affiliates, may have interests in, or other financial relationships with, borrowers under the related mortgage loans. These relationships may create conflicts of interest.

In servicing mortgage loans in any of our trusts, a master servicer, special servicer or sub-servicer will each be required to observe the terms of the governing document(s) for the related series of offered certificates—or, in the case of a sub-servicer, a consistent sub-servicing agreement—and, in particular, to act in accordance with the servicing standard described in the related prospectus supplement.  You should consider, however, that if any of these parties or an affiliate owns certificates or has financial interests in or other financial dealings with any of the related borrowers, then it may have interests when dealing with the mortgage loans underlying your offered certificates that are in conflict with your interests.  For example, if the related special servicer or an affiliate thereof or any other related entity owns any certificates, and in particular a class of non-offered certificates, it could seek to mitigate the potential loss on its certificates from a troubled mortgage loan by delaying acceleration or other enforcement in the hope of realizing greater proceeds in the future.  However, this

68

action or failure to take immediate action by a special servicer could pose a greater risk to the trust and ultimately result in a lower recovery to the related trust than would have been the case if the special servicer had not delayed in taking enforcement action.

Furthermore, a master servicer, special servicer or sub-servicer for any of our trusts may service existing and new loans for third parties, including portfolios of loans similar to the mortgage loans included in that trust.  The properties securing these other loans may be in the same markets as and compete with the properties securing mortgage loans in our trust.  Accordingly, that master servicer, special servicer or sub-servicer may be acting on behalf of parties with conflicting interests.

Property Managers and Borrowers May Each Experience Conflicts of Interest in Managing Multiple Properties.

In the case of many of the mortgage loans underlying the offered certificates, the related property managers and borrowers may experience conflicts of interest in the management and/or ownership of the related real properties because:

● the real properties may be managed by property managers that are affiliated with the related borrowers;

● the property managers also may manage additional properties, including properties that may compete with those real properties; or

● affiliates of the property managers and/or the borrowers, or the property managers and/or the borrowers themselves, also may own other properties, including properties that may compete with those real properties.

Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loans May Entail Greater Risks of Default to Lenders Than Fixed Rate Mortgage Loans

Some or all of the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may provide for adjustments to their respective mortgage interest rates and corresponding adjustments to their respective periodic debt service payments.  As the periodic debt service payment for any of those mortgage loans increases, the likelihood that cash flow from the underlying real property will be insufficient to make that periodic debt service payment and pay operating expenses also increases.

Limited Information Causes Uncertainty

Some of the mortgage loans that will be included in our trusts are loans that were made to enable the related borrower to acquire the related real property.  Accordingly, for some of these loans limited or no historical operating information is available with respect to the related real property.  As a result, you may find it difficult to analyze the historical performance of those properties.

The Risk of Terrorism in the United States and Military Action May Adversely Affect the Value of the Offered Certificates and Payments on the Mortgage Assets

It is impossible to predict the extent to which terrorist activities may occur in the United States. Furthermore, it is uncertain what effects any past or future terrorist activities and/or consequent actions on the part of the United States Government and others, including military action, will have on U.S. and world financial markets; local, regional and national economies; real estate markets across the U.S.; and/or particular business segments, including those that are important to the performance of the real properties that secure the mortgage loans underlying any series of offered certificates.  Among other things, reduced investor confidence could result

69

in substantial volatility in securities markets and a decline in real estate-related investments.  In addition, reduced consumer confidence, as well as a heightened concern for personal safety, could result in a material decline in personal spending and travel.

As a result of the foregoing, defaults on commercial real estate loans could increase; and, regardless of the performance of the mortgage loans underlying any series of offered certificates, the liquidity and market value of those offered certificates may be impaired.

Lack of Liquidity Will Impair Your Ability to Sell Your Offered Certificates and May Have an Adverse Effect on the Market Value of Your Offered Certificates

The offered certificates may have limited or no liquidity.  We cannot assure you that a secondary market for your offered certificates will develop.  There will be no obligation on the part of anyone to establish a secondary market, including any underwriter of your offered certificates, although the prospectus supplement may indicate that one or more underwriters of your offered certificates intend to establish a secondary market in the certificates.  Furthermore, a particular investor or a few investors may acquire a substantial portion of a given class of offered certificates, thereby limiting trading in that class.  Even if a secondary market does develop for your offered certificates, it may provide you with less liquidity than you anticipated and it may not continue for the life of your offered certificates.

We will describe in the related prospectus supplement the information that will be available to you with respect to your offered certificates.  The limited nature of the information may adversely affect the liquidity of your offered certificates.

We do not currently intend to list the offered certificates on any national securities exchange or the NASDAQ stock market.

Lack of liquidity will impair your ability to sell your offered certificates and may prevent you from doing so at a time when you may want or need to.  Lack of liquidity could adversely affect the market value of your offered certificates.  We do not expect that you will have any redemption rights with respect to your offered certificates.

If you decide to sell your offered certificates, you may have to sell them at a discount from the price you paid for reasons unrelated to the performance of your offered certificates or the related mortgage assets.  Pricing information regarding your offered certificates may not be generally available on an ongoing basis.

The Market Value of Your Offered Certificates May Be Adversely Affected by Factors Unrelated to the Performance of Your Offered Certificates and the Underlying Mortgage Assets, such as Fluctuations in Interest Rates and the Supply and Demand of CMBS Generally

The market value of your offered certificates can decline even if those certificates and the underlying mortgage assets are performing at or above your expectations.

The market value of your offered certificates will be sensitive to fluctuations in current interest rates.  However, a change in the market value of your offered certificates as a result of an upward or downward movement in current interest rates may not equal the change in the market value of your offered certificates as a result of an equal but opposite movement in interest rates.

70

The market value of your offered certificates will also be influenced by the supply of and demand for commercial mortgage-backed securities generally.  The supply of commercial mortgage-backed securities will depend on, among other things, the amount of commercial and multifamily mortgage loans, whether newly originated or held in portfolio, that are available for securitization.  A number of factors will affect investors’ demand for commercial mortgage-backed securities, including—

● the availability of alternative investments that offer higher yields or are perceived as being a better credit risk, having a less volatile market value or being more liquid,

● legal and other restrictions that prohibit a particular entity from investing in commercial mortgage-backed securities or limit the amount or types of commercial mortgage-backed securities that it may acquire,

● investors’ perceptions regarding the commercial and multifamily real estate markets, which may be adversely affected by, among other things, a decline in real estate values or an increase in defaults and foreclosures on mortgage loans secured by income-producing properties, and

● investors’ perceptions regarding the capital markets in general, which may be adversely affected by political, social and economic events completely unrelated to the commercial and multifamily real estate markets.

If you decide to sell your offered certificates, you may have to sell at discount from the price you paid for reasons unrelated to the performance of your offered certificates or the related mortgage assets.  Pricing information regarding your offered certificates may not be generally available on an ongoing basis.

The Credit Crisis and Downturn in the Real Estate Market Have Adversely Affected the Value of Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities

Recent events in the real estate securitization markets, as well as the debt markets generally, have caused significant dislocations, illiquidity and volatility in the market for commercial mortgage-backed securities, as well as in the wider global financial markets.  Declining real estate values, coupled with diminished availability of leverage and/or refinancings for commercial and multifamily real estate has resulted in increased delinquencies and defaults on loans secured by that real estate.  In addition, the downturn in the general economy has affected the financial strength of many commercial real estate tenants and has resulted in increased rent delinquencies and increased vacancies, particularly in the retail sector.  Any continued downturn may lead to increased vacancies, decreased rents or other declines in income from, or the value of, commercial and multifamily real estate, which would likely have an adverse effect on securities that are backed by loans secured by that real estate and thus affect the values of those securities.  We cannot assure you that the dislocation in the commercial mortgage-backed securities market will not continue to occur or become more severe or how it will affect the value of your offered certificates.

In addition to credit factors directly affecting commercial mortgage-backed securities, the continuing fallout from a downturn in the residential mortgage-backed securities market and markets for other asset-backed and structured products has also contributed to a decline in the market value and liquidity of commercial mortgage-backed securities.  The deterioration of other structured products markets may continue to adversely affect the value of commercial mortgage-backed securities.  Even if your offered certificates are performing as anticipated, the value of your offered certificates in the secondary market may nevertheless decline as a result of a deterioration in general market conditions for other asset-backed or structured products.  Trading activity associated with commercial mortgage-backed securities indices may also drive spreads on those indices wider than spreads on commercial mortgage-backed securities, thereby resulting in a decrease in value of your offered certificates.

71

Certain Classes of the Offered Certificates are Subordinate to, and are Therefore Riskier than, One or More Other Classes of Certificates of the Same Series

If you purchase any offered certificates that are subordinate to one or more other classes of offered certificates of the same series, then your offered certificates will provide credit support to such other classes of certificates of the same series that are senior to your offered certificates. As a result, you will receive payments after, and must bear the effects of losses on the trust assets before, the holders of those other classes of  certificates of the same series that are senior to your offered certificates.

When making an investment decision, you should consider, among other things—

● the payment priorities of the respective classes of the certificates of the same series,

● the order in which the principal balances of the respective classes of the certificates of the same series with balances will be reduced in connection with losses and default-related shortfalls, and

● the characteristics and quality of the mortgage loans in the related trust.

Payments on the Offered Certificates Will Be Made Solely from the Limited Assets of the Related Trust, and Those Assets May Be Insufficient to Make All Required Payments on Those Certificates

The offered certificates will represent interests solely in, and will be payable solely from the limited assets of, the related trust.  The offered certificates will not represent interests in or obligations of us, any sponsor or any of our or their respective affiliates, and no such person or entity will be responsible for making payments on the offered certificates if collections on the related trust assets are insufficient.  No governmental agency or instrumentality will guarantee or insure payment on the offered certificates.  Furthermore, some classes of offered certificates will represent a subordinate right to receive payments out of collections and/or advances on some or all of the related trust assets.  If the related trust assets are insufficient to make payments on your offered certificates, no other assets will be available to you for payment of the deficiency, and you will bear the resulting loss.  Any advances made by a master servicer or other party with respect to the mortgage assets underlying your offered certificates are intended solely to provide liquidity and not credit support.  The party making those advances will have a right to reimbursement, probably with interest, which is senior to your right to receive payment on your offered certificates.

Any Credit Support for Your Offered Certificates May Be Insufficient to Protect You Against All Potential Losses

The Amount of Credit Support Will Be Limited. The rating agencies that assign ratings to your offered certificates will establish the amount of credit support, if any, for your offered certificates based on, among other things, an assumed level of defaults, delinquencies and losses with respect to the related mortgage assets.  Actual losses may, however, exceed the assumed levels.  See “Description of the Certificates—Allocation of Losses and Shortfalls” and “Description of Credit Support.”  If actual losses on the related mortgage assets exceed the assumed levels, you may be required to bear the additional losses.

Credit Support May Not Cover All Types of Losses.  The credit support, if any, for your offered certificates may not cover all of your potential losses.  For example, some forms of credit support may not cover or may provide limited protection against losses that you may suffer by reason of fraud or negligence or as a result of uninsured casualties at the real properties securing the underlying mortgage loans.  You may be required to bear any losses which are not covered by the credit support.

Disproportionate Benefits May Be Given to Some Classes and Series to the Detriment of Others.  If a form of credit support covers multiple classes or series and losses exceed the amount of that credit support, it is

72

possible that the holders of offered certificates of another series or class will be disproportionately benefited by that credit support to your detriment.

The Interests of Certain Certificateholders With Rights and Powers Over Certain Servicing Actions and to Cure and Purchase Certain Mortgage Loans May Be in Conflict with the Interests of the Offered Certificateholders of the Same Series

The holder(s) or beneficial owner(s) of all or a specified portion of particular certificates, or a particular group or class of certificates, of any series that includes offered certificates may be entitled to: (a) direct and advise the related master servicer and/or special servicer with respect to various actions, and subject to various conditions, that will be described in the related prospectus supplement, which actions may include specified servicing actions with respect to all or any one or more particular mortgage loans and/or foreclosure properties in the related trust;(b) replace the special servicer with respect to one or more mortgage loans and/or foreclosure properties in the related trust, subject to satisfaction of the conditions described in the related prospectus supplement; and (c) exercise cure rights and/or purchase options with respect to mortgage loans, or one or more particular mortgage loans, in the related trust as to which specified defaults have occurred or are reasonably foreseeable.  Some of the foregoing rights and powers may be assignable or may be exercisable through a representative.

The certificateholders and/or certificate owners possessing — directly or through representatives — the rights and powers described above will generally be, at least initially, the holders or beneficial owners of non-offered certificates. Those certificateholders and/or certificate owners are therefore likely to have interests that conflict with those of the holders of the offered certificates of the same series.  You should expect that those certificateholders and/or certificate owners — directly or through representatives — will exercise their rights and powers solely in their own best interests and will not be liable to the holders or beneficial owners of any other class of certificates of the subject series for so doing.

Bankruptcy of a Servicer May Adversely Affect Collections on the Mortgage Loans and the Ability to Replace the Servicer

The servicer for a series of certificates may be eligible to become a debtor under the U.S. bankruptcy code or enter into receivership under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.  If a servicer for any series of certificates were to become a debtor under the U.S. bankruptcy code or enter into receivership under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, although the related pooling and servicing agreement or similar document provides that such an event would be a termination event entitling the trust to terminate the servicer, the provision would most likely not be enforceable.  However, a rejection of the servicing agreement by the servicer in a bankruptcy proceeding or repudiation of the pooling and servicing agreement or similar document in a receivership under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act would be treated as a breach of the pooling and servicing agreement or similar document and give the trust a claim for damages and the ability to appoint a successor servicer.  An assumption under the U.S. bankruptcy code would require the servicer to cure its pre-bankruptcy defaults, if any, and demonstrate that it is able to perform following assumption.  The bankruptcy court may permit the servicer to assume the pooling and servicing agreement or similar document and assign it to a third party. An insolvency by an entity governed by state insolvency law would vary depending on the laws of the particular state. We cannot assure you that a bankruptcy or receivership of the servicer would not adversely impact the servicing of the mortgage loans or that the trust would be entitled to terminate servicer in a timely manner or at all. If any servicer becomes the subject of bankruptcy or similar proceedings, the trust’s claim to collections in that servicer’s possession at the time of the bankruptcy filing or other similar filing may not be perfected. In this event, funds available to pay principal and interest on your certificates may be delayed or reduced.

73

Additional Compensation to the Master Servicer and the Special Servicer and Interest on Advances Will Affect Your Right to Receive Distributions on Your Offered Certificates

To the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee and any fiscal agent will each be entitled to receive interest on unreimbursed advances made by that party with respect to the mortgage assets. This interest will generally accrue from the date on which the related advance was made or the related expense was incurred through the date of reimbursement. In addition, under certain circumstances, including a default by the borrower in the payment of principal and interest on a mortgage asset, that mortgage asset will become specially serviced and the related special servicer will be entitled to compensation for performing special servicing functions pursuant to the related governing document(s). The right to receive interest on advances or special servicing compensation is senior to the rights of certificateholders to receive distributions on the offered certificates. Thus, the payment of interest on advances and the payment of special servicing compensation may lead to shortfalls in amounts otherwise distributable on your offered certificates.

Inability to Replace the Master Servicer Could Affect Collections and Recoveries on the Mortgage Assets

The structure of the servicing fee payable to the master servicer might affect the ability to find a replacement master servicer.  Although the trustee is required to replace the master servicer if the master servicer is terminated or resigns, if the trustee is unwilling (including for example because the servicing fee is insufficient) or unable (including for example, because the trustee does not have the systems to service mortgage loans), it may be necessary to appoint a replacement master servicer.  Because the master servicing fee is structured as a percentage of the stated principal balance of each mortgage asset, it may be difficult to replace the servicer at a time when the balance of the mortgage loans has been significantly reduced because the fee may be insufficient to cover the costs associated with servicing the mortgage assets and/or related REO properties remaining in the mortgage pool.  The performance of the mortgage assets may be negatively impacted, beyond the expected transition period during a servicing transfer, if a replacement master servicer is not retained within a reasonable amount of time.

Problems with Book-Entry Registration

Your offered certificates may be issued in book-entry form through the facilities of the Depository Trust Company.  As a result—

● you will be able to exercise your rights as a certificateholder only indirectly through the Depository Trust Company and its participating organizations;

● you may have only limited access to information regarding your offered certificates;

● you may suffer delays in the receipt of payments on your offered certificates; and

● your ability to pledge or otherwise take action with respect to your offered certificates may be limited due to the lack of a physical certificate evidencing your ownership of those certificates.

See “Description of the Certificates—Book-Entry Registration.”

Taxes on Foreclosure Property Will Reduce Amounts Available to Make Payments on the Offered Certificates

Any of our trusts may be designated, in whole or in part, as a real estate mortgage investment conduit for federal income tax purposes.  If that trust acquires a real property through a foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure, then the related special servicer may be required to retain an independent contractor to operate and

74

manage the property.  Receipt of the following types of income on that property will subject the trust to federal, and possibly state or local, tax on that income at the highest marginal corporate tax rate:

● any net income from that operation and management that does not consist of qualifying rents from real property within the meaning of Section 856(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and

● any rental income based on the net profits of a tenant or sub-tenant or allocable to a service that is non-customary in the area and for the type of building involved.

The risk of taxation being imposed on income derived from the operation of foreclosed real property is particularly present in the case of hospitality and health care-related properties. These taxes, and the cost of retaining an independent contractor, would reduce the net proceeds available for payment with respect to the related offered certificates.

In addition, in connection with the trust’s acquisition of a real property, through foreclosure or similar action, and/or its liquidation of such property, the trust may in certain jurisdictions, particularly in New York and California, be required to pay state or local transfer or excise taxes. Such state or local taxes may reduce net proceeds available for distribution to the offered certificates.

Changes to REMIC Restrictions on Loan Modifications May Impact an Investment in the Certificates

Ordinarily, a grantor trust that modifies a mortgage loan jeopardizes its tax status as a grantor trust, and a REMIC that modifies a mortgage loan jeopardizes its tax status as a REMIC and risks having a 100% penalty tax being imposed on any income from the mortgage loan.  A REMIC, and possibly a grantor trust, may avoid such consequences, however, if the default of such mortgage loan is “reasonably foreseeable” or other special circumstances apply.

The IRS has issued Revenue Procedure 2009-45 easing the tax requirements for a servicer to modify a commercial or multifamily mortgage loan held in a REMIC or a grantor trust by interpreting the circumstances when default is “reasonably foreseeable” to include those where the related servicer reasonably believes that there is a “significant risk of default” with respect to the mortgage loan upon maturity of the mortgage loan or at an earlier date, and that by making such modification the risk of default is substantially reduced. Accordingly, if the master servicer or the special servicer determined that the mortgage loan was at significant risk of default and permitted one or more modifications otherwise consistent with the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, any such modification may impact the timing of payments and ultimate recovery on that mortgage loan, and likewise on one or more classes of certificates.

In addition, the IRS has issued final regulations under the REMIC provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that allow a servicer to modify terms of REMIC-held mortgage loans that relate to changes in collateral, credit enhancement and recourse features, provided that after the modification the mortgage loan remains “principally secured by real property” (that is, as long as the loan continues to satisfy the “REMIC LTV Test”).  In general, a mortgage loan meets the REMIC LTV Test if the loan-to-value ratio is no greater than 125%.  One of the modifications covered by the final regulations is a release of a lien on one or more of the properties securing a REMIC-held mortgage loan.  Following such a release, however, it may be difficult to demonstrate that a mortgage loan still meets the REMIC LTV Test.  To provide relief for taxpayers, the IRS has issued Revenue Procedure 2010-30, which describes circumstances in which the IRS will not challenge whether a mortgage loan satisfies the REMIC LTV Test following a lien release.  The lien releases covered by Revenue Procedure 2010-30 are “grandfathered transactions” and transactions in which the release is part of a “qualified pay-down transaction.”  If the value of the real property securing a mortgage loan were to decline, the need to comply with the rules of Revenue Procedure 2010-30 could restrict the special servicer’s actions in negotiating the terms of a workout or in allowing minor lien releases for cases in which a mortgage loan could fail the REMIC LTV Test

75

following the release.  This could impact the timing and ultimate recovery on a mortgage loan, and likewise on one or more classes of certificates.  Further, if a mortgaged property becomes the subject of a partial condemnation and, after giving effect to the partial taking the mortgaged property has a loan-to-value ratio in excess of 125%, the related mortgage loan may be subject to being paid down by a “qualified amount” (within the meaning of Revenue Procedure 2010-30) notwithstanding the existence of a prepayment lockout period.

You should consider the possible impact on your investment of any existing REMIC or grantor trust restrictions as well as any potential changes to the tax rules governing REMICs or grantor trusts.

Residual Interests in a Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit Have Adverse Tax Consequences

Inclusion of Taxable Income in Excess of Cash Received.  If you own a certificate that evidences a residual interest in a real estate mortgage investment conduit, or REMIC, for federal income tax purposes, you will have to report on your income tax return as ordinary income your pro rata share of the taxable income of that REMIC, regardless of the amount or timing of your possible receipt of any cash on the certificate.  As a result, your offered certificate may have phantom income early in the term of the REMIC because the taxable income from the certificate may exceed the amount of economic income, if any, attributable to the certificate.  While you will have a corresponding amount of tax losses later in the term of the REMIC, the present value of the phantom income may significantly exceed the present value of the tax losses.  Therefore, the after-tax yield on any REMIC residual certificate may be significantly less than that of a corporate bond or other instrument having similar cash flow characteristics.  In fact, some offered certificates that are residual interests, may have a negative value.

You will have to report your share of the taxable income and net loss of the REMIC until all the certificates in the related series have a principal balance of zero. See “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—REMICs.”

Some Taxable Income of a Residual Interest Cannot Be Offset Under the Internal Revenue Code.  A portion of the taxable income from a REMIC residual certificate may be treated as excess inclusions under the Internal Revenue Code.  You will have to pay tax on the excess inclusions regardless of whether you have other credits, deductions or losses.  In particular, the tax on excess inclusion:

● generally will not be reduced by losses from other activities,

● for a tax-exempt holder, will be treated as unrelated business taxable income, and

● for a foreign holder, will not qualify for any exemption from withholding tax.

Individuals and Certain Entities Should Not Invest in REMIC Residual Certificates.  The fees and non-interest expenses of a REMIC will be allocated pro rata to certificates that are residual interests in the REMIC.  However, individuals will only be able to deduct these expenses as miscellaneous itemized deductions, which are subject to numerous restrictions and limitations under the Internal Revenue Code.  Therefore, the certificates that are residual interests generally are not appropriate investments for:

● individuals,

● estates,

● trusts beneficially owned by any individual or estate, and

● pass-through entities having any individual, estate or trust as a shareholder, member or partner.

76

In addition, the REMIC residual certificates will be subject to numerous transfer restrictions.  These restrictions will reduce your ability to liquidate a REMIC residual certificate.  For example, unless we indicate otherwise in the related prospectus supplement, you will not be able to transfer a REMIC residual certificate to—

● a foreign person under the Internal Revenue Code, or

● an entity that is classified as a U.S. partnership under the Internal Revenue Code if any of its partners, directly or indirectly (other than through a U.S. corporation) is (or is permitted to be under the partnership agreement) a foreign person under the Internal Revenue Code, or

● a foreign permanent establishment or fixed base (within the meaning of an applicable income tax treaty) of a U.S. person.

It is possible that a class of offered certificates would also evidence a residual interest in a REMIC and therefore that class of offered certificates or the portion thereof that represents the residual interest in the REMIC would exhibit the characteristics, and be subject to the risks, described above in this “—Residual Interests in a Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit Have Adverse Tax Consequences” section.

Finally, you should be aware that Treasury regulations do not permit REMIC residual certificates to be marked to market under section 475 of the Internal Revenue Code.  We recommend that you consult your tax advisors regarding these regulations.

See “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Residual Certificates.”

No Gross Up in Respect of the Certificates Held by Non-U.S. Persons

To the extent that any withholding tax is imposed on payments of interest or other payments on any certificates, as a result of any change in applicable law or otherwise, there will be no obligation to make any “gross-up” payments to certificateholders in respect of such taxes and such withholding tax would therefore result in a shortfall to affected certificateholders.  See “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—REMICs—Foreign Investors in REMIC Certificates” and “—FATCA”, “—Taxation of Classes of Exchangeable Certificates—FATCA”, and “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—Grantor Trusts—Foreign Investors” and “—FATCA.”

Certain Federal Tax Considerations Regarding Original Issue Discount

Certain classes of certificates may be issued with original issue discount for federal income tax purposes, which generally will result in recognition of taxable income in advance of the receipt of cash attributable to that income.  Accordingly, investors must have sufficient sources of cash to pay any federal, state or local income taxes with regard to the original issue discount.  See “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Original Issue Discount” and “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—Grantor Trusts.”

The Nature of Ratings Are Limited and Will Not Guarantee that You Will Receive Any Projected Return on Your Offered Certificates

Any credit rating assigned by a rating agency to a class of offered certificates will reflect only its assessment of the likelihood that holders of the certificates will receive payments to which the certificateholders

77

are entitled under the related pooling and servicing agreement.  Such rating will not constitute an assessment of the likelihood that—

● principal prepayments on the related mortgage loans will be made;

● the degree to which the rate of such prepayments might differ from that originally anticipated; or

● the likelihood of early optional termination of the trust.

Any rating will not address the possibility that prepayment of the mortgage loans at a higher or lower rate than anticipated by an investor may cause such investor to experience a lower than anticipated yield or that an investor purchasing a certificate at a significant premium might fail to recover its initial investment under certain prepayment scenarios.  Therefore, a rating assigned by a rating agency does not guarantee or ensure the realization of any anticipated yield on a class of offered certificates.

The amount, type and nature of credit support given a series of offered certificates will be determined on the basis of criteria established by each rating agency rating classes of the certificates of such series.  Those criteria are sometimes based upon an actuarial analysis of the behavior of mortgage loans in a larger group.  There can be no assurance that the historical data supporting any such actuarial analysis will accurately reflect future experience, or that the data derived from a large pool of mortgage loans will accurately predict the delinquency, foreclosure or loss experience of any particular pool of mortgage loans.  In other cases, such criteria may be based upon determinations of the values of the properties that provide security for the mortgage loans.  However, we cannot assure you that those values will not decline in the future.  As a result, the credit support required in respect of the offered certificates of any series may be insufficient to fully protect the holders of those certificates from losses on the related mortgage asset pool.

The Ratings of Your Offered Certificates May Be Lowered or Withdrawn, or Your Certificates May Receive an Unsolicited Rating, Which May Adversely Affect the Liquidity, Market Value and Regulatory Characteristics of Your Offered Certificates

Unless otherwise provided in the prospectus supplement (and in any event as may be required by the applicable regulations associated with the depositor’s use of Form S-3 for the registration statement pursuant to which the offering of the offered certificates is being made hereby), it is a condition to the issuance of the offered certificates that they be rated investment grade (i.e., in one of the four highest rating categories) by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization.  A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time.  No person is obligated to maintain the rating on any offered certificate, and accordingly, there can be no assurance to you that the ratings assigned to any offered certificate on the date on which the certificate is originally issued will not be lowered or withdrawn by a rating agency at any time thereafter.  The rating(s) of any series of offered certificates by any applicable rating agency may be lowered following the initial issuance of the certificates as a result of the downgrading of the obligations of any applicable credit support provider, or as a result of losses on the related mortgage loans in excess of the levels contemplated by the rating agency at the time of its initial rating analysis.  In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission may determine that any rating agency retained by the depositor, a sponsor or an underwriter to provide a security rating on any class of any series of offered certificates no longer qualifies as a “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” or is no longer qualified to rate any such class of offered certificates.  Neither the depositor nor any related sponsor nor any of their respective affiliates will have any obligation to replace or supplement any credit support, or to take any other action to maintain any rating(s) of any series of offered certificates.  If any rating is revised or withdrawn or if any rating agencies retained by the depositor, a sponsor or an underwriter to provide a security rating on any class of any series of offered certificates no longer qualifies as a “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” or is no longer qualified to rate any such class of offered certificates, the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of your offered certificates may be adversely affected.

78

Additionally, it is possible that rating agencies not hired by the depositor, a sponsor or an underwriter may provide unsolicited ratings that differ from the ratings provided by any rating agencies retained by the depositor, a sponsor or an underwriter.  There can be no assurance that an unsolicited rating will not be issued prior to or after the closing date of any series of offered certificates, and none of the depositor, any related sponsor or any related underwriter is obligated to inform investors (or potential investors) in any series offered certificates if an unsolicited rating is issued after the date of the related prospectus supplement.  Consequently, if you intend to purchase offered certificates, you should monitor whether an unsolicited rating of the offered certificates has been issued by a non-hired rating agency and should consult with your financial and legal advisors regarding the impact of an unsolicited rating on a class of offered certificates.  If any non-hired rating agency provides an unsolicited rating that differs from (or is lower than) the rating provided by any rating agency retained by the depositor, a sponsor or an underwriter in connection with any series issuance, the liquidity, market value and regulatory characteristics of your offered certificates may be adversely affected.

Any downgrading or unsolicited rating of a class of offered certificates to below “investment grade” may affect your ability to purchase or retain, or otherwise impact the regulatory characteristics, of those certificates.

CAPITALIZED TERMS USED IN THIS PROSPECTUS

From time to time we use capitalized terms in this prospectus.  Frequently used capitalized terms will have the respective meanings assigned to them in the “Glossary” attached to this prospectus.

THE TRUST FUND

Description of the Trust Assets

The trust assets backing a series of offered certificates will collectively constitute the related trust fund.  Each such trust fund will primarily consist of:

● various types of multifamily and/or commercial mortgage loans;

● mortgage participations, pass-through certificates, collateralized mortgage obligations or other mortgage-backed securities that directly or indirectly evidence interests in, or are secured by pledges of, one or more of various types of multifamily and/or commercial mortgage loans; or

● a combination of mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities of the types described above.

In addition to the asset classes described above in this “Description of the Trust Assets” section, we may include in the trust with respect to any series of offered certificates other asset classes, provided that such other asset classes in the aggregate do not exceed 10% by principal balance of the related asset pool.  We will describe the specific characteristics of the mortgage assets underlying a series of offered certificates in the related prospectus supplement.

Unless we indicate otherwise in the related prospectus supplement, we will acquire, directly or through one of our affiliates, in the secondary market, any mortgage-backed security to be included in one of our trusts.

Neither we nor any of our affiliates will guarantee payment on any of the mortgage assets included in one of our trusts.  Furthermore, unless we indicate otherwise in the related prospectus supplement, no governmental agency or instrumentality will guarantee or insure payment on any of those mortgage assets.

79

Mortgage Loans

General.  Each mortgage loan underlying the offered certificates will constitute the obligation of one or more persons to repay a debt.  That obligation will be evidenced by a promissory note or bond.  In addition, that obligation will be secured by a mortgage, deed of trust or other security instrument that creates a first or junior lien on, or security interest in, an interest in one or more of the following types of real property:

● rental or cooperatively-owned buildings with multiple dwelling units;

● retail properties related to the sale of consumer goods and other products to the general public, such as shopping centers, malls, factory outlet centers, automotive sales centers, department stores and other retail stores, grocery stores, specialty shops, convenience stores and gas stations;

● retail properties related to providing entertainment, recreational and personal services to the general public, such as movie theaters, fitness centers, bowling alleys, salons, dry cleaners and automotive service centers;

● office properties;

● hospitality properties, such as hotels, motels and other lodging facilities;

● casino properties;

● health care-related properties, such as hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, nursing homes, congregate care facilities and, in some cases, assisted living centers and senior housing;

● industrial properties;

● warehouse facilities, mini-warehouse facilities and self-storage facilities;

● restaurants, taverns and other establishments involved in the food and beverage industry;

● manufactured housing communities, mobile home parks and recreational vehicle parks;

● recreational and resort properties, such as golf courses, marinas, ski resorts and amusement parks;

● arenas and stadiums;

● churches and other religious facilities;

● parking lots and garages;

● mixed use properties;

● other income-producing properties; and

● unimproved land.

The adequacy of an income-producing property as security for a mortgage loan depends in large part on its value and ability to generate net operating income.  Set forth above under “Risk Factors—The Various Types of Multifamily and Commercial Properties that May Secure Mortgage Loans Underlying a Series of Offered

80

Certificates May Present Special Risks” is a discussion of some of the various factors that may affect the value and operations of each of the indicated types of multifamily and commercial properties.

The real property interests that may be encumbered in order to secure a mortgage loan underlying your offered certificates, include—

● a fee interest or estate, which consists of ownership of the property for an indefinite period,

● an estate for years, which consists of ownership of the property for a specified period of years,

● a leasehold interest or estate, which consists of a right to occupy and use the property for a specified period of years, subject to the terms and conditions of a lease,

● shares in a cooperative corporation which owns the property, or

● any other real estate interest under applicable local law.

Any of these real property interests may be subject to deed restrictions, easements, rights of way and other matters of public record with respect to the related property.  In addition, the use of, and improvements that may be constructed on, any particular real property will, in most cases, be subject to zoning laws and other legal restrictions.

Most, if not all, of the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates will be secured by liens on real properties located in the United States, its territories and possessions.  However, some of those mortgage loans may be secured by liens on real properties located outside the United States, its territories and possessions, provided that foreign mortgage loans do not represent more than 10% of the related mortgage asset pool, by balance.

Loan Combinations. Certain of the mortgage loans included in one of our trust funds may be part of a loan combination.  A loan combination will generally consist of the particular mortgage loan or loans that we will include in the subject trust fund and one or more other mortgage loans that we will not include in the trust fund.  Each mortgage loan comprising a particular loan combination is evidenced by a separate promissory note.  The aggregate debt represented by the entire loan combination, however, is secured by the same mortgage(s) or deed(s) of trust on the related mortgaged property or properties.  The mortgage loans constituting a particular loan combination are obligations of the same borrower and, in general, are cross-defaulted.  The allocation of payments to the respective mortgage loans comprising a loan combination, whether on a senior/subordinated or a pari passu basis (or some combination thereof), is either effected through a co-lender agreement or other intercreditor arrangement to which the respective holders of the subject promissory notes are parties and/or may be reflected in the subject promissory notes, a common loan agreement or other common loan document.  Such co-lender agreement or other intercreditor arrangement will, in general, govern the respective rights of the noteholders, including in connection with the servicing of the respective mortgage loans comprising a loan combination.  Further, each such co-lender agreement or other intercreditor arrangement may impose restrictions of the transferability of the ownership of any mortgage loan that is part of a loan combination.  “Risk Factors—With Respect to Certain Mortgage Loans Included in Our Trusts, the Mortgaged Property or Properties that Secure the Subject Mortgage Loan in the Trust Also Secure One or More Related Mortgage Loans That Are Not in the Trust; The Interests of the Holders of Those Non-Trust Mortgage Loans May Conflict with Your Interests.”

Junior Mortgage Loans.  If we so indicate in the related prospectus supplement, one or more of the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may be secured by a junior lien on the related real property.  However, the loan or loans secured by the more senior liens on that property may not be included in the related trust fund.  The primary risk to the holder of a mortgage loan secured by a junior lien on a real property is the possibility that the foreclosure proceeds remaining after payment of the loans secured by more senior liens on

81

that property will be insufficient to pay the junior loan in full.  In a foreclosure proceeding, the sale proceeds are generally applied—

● first, to the payment of court costs and fees in connection with the foreclosure,

● second, to the payment of real estate taxes, and

● third, to the payment of any and all principal, interest, prepayment or acceleration penalties, and other amounts owing to the holder of the senior loans.

The claims of the holders of the senior loans must be satisfied in full before the holder of the junior loan receives any payments with respect to the junior loan.  If a lender forecloses on a junior loan, it does so subject to any related senior loans.

Delinquent Mortgage Loans.  If we so indicate in the related prospectus supplement, the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may be delinquent as of the date the certificates are initially issued.  In those cases, we will describe in the related prospectus supplement—

● the period of the delinquency,

● any forbearance arrangement then in effect,

● the condition of the related real property, and

● the ability of the related real property to generate income to service the mortgage debt.

We will not, however, transfer any mortgage loan to a trust if we know that the mortgage loan is, at the time of transfer, more than 90 days delinquent with respect to any scheduled payment of principal or interest or in foreclosure.  Furthermore, delinquent mortgage loans will not constitute 20% or more, as measured by dollar volume, of the mortgage asset pool for a series of offered certificates as of the relevant measurement date.

Payment Provisions of the Mortgage Loans.  Each of the mortgage loans included in one of our trusts will have the following features:

● an original term to maturity of not more than approximately 40 years; and

● scheduled payments of principal, interest or both, to be made on specified dates, that occur monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, semi-annually, annually or at some other interval.

A mortgage loan included in one of our trusts may also include terms that:

● provide for the accrual of interest at a mortgage interest rate that is fixed over its term, that resets on one or more specified dates or that otherwise adjusts from time to time;

● provide for the accrual of interest at a mortgage interest rate that may be converted at the borrower’s election from an adjustable to a fixed interest rate or from a fixed to an adjustable interest rate;

● provide for no accrual of interest;

● provide for level payments to stated maturity, for payments that reset in amount on one or more specified dates or for payments that otherwise adjust from time to time to accommodate changes in the coupon rate or to reflect the occurrence of specified events;

82

● be fully amortizing or, alternatively, may be partially amortizing or nonamortizing, with a substantial payment of principal due on its stated maturity date;

● permit the negative amortization or deferral of accrued interest;

● permit defeasance and the release of the real property collateral in connection with that defeasance; and/or

● prohibit some or all voluntary prepayments or require payment of a premium, fee or charge in connection with those prepayments.

Mortgage Loan Information in Prospectus Supplements.  We will describe in the related prospectus supplement the characteristics of the mortgage loans that we will include in any of our trusts.  In general, we will provide in the related prospectus supplement, among other items, the following information on the particular mortgage loans in one of our trusts:

● the total outstanding principal balance and the largest, smallest and average outstanding principal balance of the mortgage loans;

● the type or types of property that provide security for repayment of the mortgage loans;

● the earliest and latest origination date and maturity date of the mortgage loans;

● the original and remaining terms to maturity of the mortgage loans, or the range of each of those terms to maturity, and the weighted average original and remaining terms to maturity of the mortgage loans;

● loan-to-value ratios of the mortgage loans either at origination or as of a more recent date, or the range of those loan-to-value ratios, and the weighted average of those loan-to-value ratios;

● the mortgage interest rates of the mortgage loans, or the range of those mortgage interest rates, and the weighted average mortgage interest rate of the mortgage loans;

● if any mortgage loans have adjustable mortgage interest rates, the index or indices upon which the adjustments are based, the adjustment dates, the range of gross margins and the weighted average gross margin, and any limits on mortgage interest rate adjustments at the time of any adjustment and over the life of the loan;

● information on the payment characteristics of the mortgage loans, including applicable prepayment restrictions;

● debt service coverage ratios of the mortgage loans either at origination or as of a more recent date, or the range of those debt service coverage ratios, and the weighted average of those debt service coverage ratios; and

● the geographic distribution of the properties securing the mortgage loans on a state-by-state basis.

If we are unable to provide the specific information described above at the time a series of offered certificates is initially offered, to the extent such information is not otherwise required to be included in the related prospectus supplement pursuant to the Securities Act, we will provide—

● more general information in the related prospectus supplement, and

83

● specific information in a report which will be filed with the SEC as part of a Current Report on Form 8-K following the issuance of those certificates.

In addition, with respect to any obligor or group of affiliated obligors with respect to any pool asset or group of pool assets, or property or group of related properties securing any pool asset or group of pool assets, if such pool asset or group of pool assets represents a material concentration within the mortgage asset pool, we will include in the related prospectus supplement financial statements or other financial information on the related real property or properties as required under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.

Underwriting and Interim Servicing Standards Applicable to the Mortgage Loans.  The mortgage loans underlying your offered certificates will be newly originated or seasoned mortgage loans and will be purchased or otherwise acquired from third parties, which third parties may or may not be originators of the mortgage loans and may or may not be affiliates of the depositor. The origination standards and procedures applicable to the mortgage loans may differ from series to series or among the mortgage loans in a given mortgage pool, depending on the identity of the originator or originators. In the case of seasoned mortgage loans, the procedures by which the mortgage loans have been serviced from their origination to the time of their inclusion in the related mortgage pool may also differ from series to series or among the mortgage loans in a given mortgage pool.

We will include in the related prospectus supplement information as to the origination standards and procedures applicable to the mortgage loans underlying  your offered certificates and, to the extent applicable and material, will provide information as to the servicing of the mortgage loans prior to their inclusion in the mortgage pool underlying your offered certificates.

Real Property and Other Collateral.  Following a foreclosure, acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or any enforcement action, trust assets may include real property or other collateral for a defaulted mortgage loan pending the liquidation of that collateral.

Mortgage-Backed Securities

The mortgage-backed securities underlying a series of offered certificates may include:

● mortgage participations, mortgage pass-through certificates, collateralized mortgage obligations or other mortgage-backed securities that are not insured or guaranteed by any governmental agency or instrumentality, or

● certificates issued and/or insured or guaranteed by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Ginnie Mae, Farmer Mac, or another federal or state governmental agency or instrumentality.

In addition, each of those mortgage-backed securities will directly or indirectly evidence an interest in, or be secured by a pledge of, multifamily and/or commercial mortgage loans.

Each mortgage-backed security included in one of our trusts—

● will have been registered under the Securities Act, or

● will be exempt from the registration requirements of that Act, or

● will have been held for at least the holding period specified in Rule 144(d) under that Act, or

● may otherwise be resold by us publicly without registration under that Act.

84

We will describe in the related prospectus supplement the characteristics of the mortgage-backed securities that we will include in any of our trusts.  In general, we will provide in the related prospectus supplement, among other items, the following information on the particular mortgage-backed securities included in one of our trusts:

● the initial and outstanding principal amount(s) and type of the securities;

● the original and remaining term(s) to stated maturity of the securities;

● the pass-through or bond rate(s) of the securities or the formula for determining those rate(s);

● the payment characteristics of the securities;

● the identity of the issuer(s), servicer(s) and trustee(s) for the securities;

● a description of the related credit support, if any;

● the type of mortgage loans underlying the securities;

● the circumstances under which the related underlying mortgage loans, or the securities themselves, may be purchased prior to maturity;

● the terms and conditions for substituting mortgage loans backing the securities; and

● the characteristics of any agreements or instruments providing interest rate protection to the securities.

With respect to any mortgage-backed security included in one of our trusts, we will provide in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, the same information regarding the security as is provided by the issuer of the security in its own reports filed under that Act, if the security was publicly offered, or in the reports the issuer of the security provides to the related trustee, if the security was privately issued.

Acquisition, Removal and Substitution of Mortgage Assets

We will generally acquire the mortgage assets to be included in our trusts from Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. or another of our affiliates or from another seller of commercial and multifamily mortgage loans.  We will then transfer those mortgage assets to the issuing entity for the related securitization transaction.

In general, the total outstanding principal balance of the mortgage assets transferred by us to any particular trust will equal or exceed the initial total outstanding principal balance of the related series of certificates.  If the total outstanding principal balance of the related mortgage assets initially delivered by us to the related trustee is less than the initial total outstanding principal balance of any series of certificates, and if the subject securitization transaction contemplates a prefunding period, then we will deposit or arrange for the deposit of cash or liquid investments on an interim basis with the related trustee to cover the shortfall.  For 90 days — or such other period as may be specified in the related prospectus supplement — following the date of initial issuance of that series of certificates, which 90-day or other period will be the prefunding period, we or our designee will be entitled to obtain a release of the deposited cash or investments if we deliver or arrange for delivery of a corresponding amount of mortgage assets.  If we fail, however, to deliver mortgage assets sufficient to make up the entire shortfall, any of the cash or, following liquidation, investments remaining on deposit with the related trustee will be used by the related trustee to pay down the total principal balance of the related series of certificates, as described in the related prospectus supplement.

85

If the subject securitization transaction involves a prefunding period, then we will indicate in the related prospectus supplement, among other things:

● the term or duration of the prefunding period;

● the amount of proceeds to be deposited in the prefunding account and the percentage of the mortgage asset pool represented by those proceeds;

● triggers or events that would trigger limits on or terminate the prefunding period and the effects of such triggers;

● when and how new mortgage assets may be acquired during the prefunding period, and any limitation on the ability to add mortgage assets;

● the acquisition or underwriting criteria for additional mortgage assets to be acquired during the prefunding period;

● which party has the authority to add mortgage assets or determine if proposed additional mortgage assets meet the acquisition or underwriting criteria for adding mortgage assets;

● any requirements to add minimum amounts of mortgage assets and any effects of not meeting those requirements;

● if applicable, the procedures and standards for the temporary investment of funds in the prefunding account pending use and a description of the financial products or instruments eligible for the prefunding account; and

● the circumstances under which funds in a prefunding account will be distributed to certificateholders or otherwise disposed of.

If so specified in the related prospectus supplement, we or another specified person or entity may be permitted, at our or its option, but subject to the conditions specified in that prospectus supplement, to acquire from the related trust particular mortgage assets underlying a series of offered certificates in exchange for:

● cash that would be applied to pay down the principal balances of the certificates of that series; and/or

● other mortgage loans or mortgage-backed securities that—

1. conform to the description of mortgage assets in this prospectus, and

2. satisfy the criteria set forth in the related prospectus supplement.

For example, if a mortgage loan backing a series of offered certificates defaults, then it may be subject to (a) a purchase option on the part of another lender whose loan is secured by a lien on the same real estate collateral or by a lien on a direct or indirect equity interest in the related borrower, (b) a purchase option on the part of the holder(s) or beneficial owner(s) of all or a specified portion of particular certificates, or a particular group or class of certificates, of the subject series and/or (c) a fair value purchase option under the applicable governing document(s) for the subject securitization transaction or another servicing agreement.  In some cases, those purchase options may be assignable or exercisable by a specified designee.

86

In addition, if so specified in the related prospectus supplement, a special servicer or other specified party for one of our trusts may be obligated, under the circumstances described in that prospectus supplement, to sell on behalf of the trust a delinquent or defaulted mortgage asset.

Further, if so specified in the related prospectus supplement, but subject to the conditions specified in that prospectus supplement, all of the remaining certificateholders of a given series of certificates, acting together, may exchange those certificates for all of the mortgage loans, REO properties and mortgage-backed securities remaining in the mortgage pool underlying those certificates.

If and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, we, a mortgage asset seller and/or another specified person or entity may make or assign to or for the benefit of one of our trusts various representations and warranties, or may be obligated to deliver to one of our trusts various documents, in either case relating to some or all of the mortgage assets transferred to that trust.  Upon the discovery of a material breach of any such representation or warranty or a material defect with respect to those documents, in each case that is material and adverse in accordance with a standard set forth in the related prospectus supplement, we or such other party may be required, at our or its option, to either repurchase the affected mortgage asset(s) out of the related trust or to replace the affected mortgage asset(s) with other mortgage asset(s) that satisfy the criteria set forth in the related prospectus supplement.

No replacement of mortgage assets or acquisition of new mortgage assets will be permitted if it would result in a qualification, downgrade or withdrawal of the then-current rating assigned by any rating agency to any class of affected offered certificates.

See also “Description of the Certificates—Termination and Redemption.”

Cash, Accounts and Permitted Investments

The trust assets underlying a series of offered certificates will include cash from various sources, including initial deposits and payments and collections received or advanced on the related mortgage assets and other related trust assets.

The trust assets underlying a series of offered certificates will include one or more accounts established and maintained on behalf of the holders.  All initial deposits, payments and collections received or advanced on the mortgage assets and other trust assets and other cash held by one of our trusts will be deposited and held in those accounts.  We will identify and describe those accounts, and will further describe the deposits to and withdrawals from those accounts, in the related prospectus supplement.

Funds on deposit in any account established and maintained on behalf of certificateholders may be invested in permitted investments.  In the related prospectus supplement, we will provide a summary description of those permitted investments and identify the beneficiary of any interest and other income earned on funds in an account established and maintained on behalf of certificateholders.

Credit Support

The holders of any class of offered certificates may be the beneficiaries of credit support designed to protect them partially or fully against all or particular defaults and losses on the related mortgage assets.  The types of credit support that may benefit the holders of a class of offered certificates include:

● overcollateralization and/or excess cash flow;

● the subordination of one or more other classes of certificates of the same series;

87

● a letter of credit;

● a surety bond;

● an insurance policy;

● a guarantee; and/or

● a reserve fund.

In the related prospectus supplement, we will describe the amount and types of any credit support benefiting the holders of a class of offered certificates and, if applicable, we will identify the provider of that credit support.

Arrangements Providing Reinvestment, Interest Rate and Currency Related Protection

The trust assets for a series of offered certificates may include guaranteed investment contracts in accordance with which moneys held in the funds and accounts established for that series will be invested.  For so long as it is in effect, a guaranteed investment contract will provide a specified rate of return on any and all moneys invested with the provider of that contract.

Trust assets may also include:

● interest rate exchange agreements;

● interest rate cap agreements;

● interest rate floor agreements; or

● currency exchange agreements.

In the related prospectus supplement, we will describe any agreements or other arrangements designed to protect the holders of a class of offered certificates against shortfalls resulting from movements or fluctuations in interest rates or currency exchange rates.  If applicable, we will also identify any obligor under the agreement or other arrangement.

TRANSACTION PARTICIPANTS

The Sponsor

Unless otherwise specified in the related prospectus supplement, Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (‘‘CGMRC’’), a New York corporation, will act as the sole sponsor or a co-sponsor of each securitization transaction involving the issuance of a series of offered certificates.  CGMRC was organized in 1979 and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Inc. and an affiliate of both us and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. CGMRC maintains its principal office at 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013, Attention: Mortgage Finance Group.  Its telecopy number is (212) 723-8604. CGMRC makes, and purchases from lenders, commercial and multifamily mortgage loans primarily for the purpose of securitizing them in commercial mortgage-backed securitization (‘‘CMBS’’) transactions. CGMRC also purchases and finances residential mortgage loans, consumer receivables and other financial assets.

88

The prospectus supplement for each series of certificates offered by this prospectus will also identify and provide information as to CGMRC, if it acts as sponsor, and any other sponsors for the related securitization transaction.  Such information will include, as to each such sponsor, a description of its securitization program.

The Depositor

We are Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., the depositor with respect to each series of certificates offered by this prospectus.  We were incorporated in the state of Delaware on July 17, 2003.  We were organized, among other things, for the purpose of serving as a private secondary mortgage market conduit.

We are an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. and an affiliate of Citigroup Global Markets Inc.  Our principal executive offices are located at 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013.  Our telephone number is 212-816-6000.

We do not have, and do not expect in the future to have, any significant assets.

We do not file with the SEC annual reports on Form 10-K or any other reports with respect to ourselves or our financial condition pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

We were organized, among other things, for the purposes of:

● acquiring, holding, transferring and assigning mortgage loans, or interests in those loans;

● acquiring, holding, transferring and assigning mortgage-backed securities that evidence interests in mortgage loans;

● authorizing, issuing, selling and delivering bonds or other evidence of indebtedness that are secured by a pledge or other assignment of real properties, mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, reserve funds, guaranteed investment contracts, letters of credit, insurance contracts, surety bonds or any other credit enhancement device or interest rate or currency protection device;

● acting as depositor of one or more trusts formed to issue, sell and deliver bonds or certificates of interest that are secured by a pledge or assignment of, or represent interests in, pools of mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities; and

● doing all such things as are reasonable or necessary to enable us to carry out any of the above, including entering into loan agreements, servicing agreements and reimbursements agreements and selling certificates of interest in any trust for which we serve as depositor.

Since our incorporation in 2003, we have been engaged in the securitization of commercial and multifamily mortgage loans and in acting as depositor of one or more trusts formed to issue commercial mortgage pass-through certificates that are secured by or represent interests in, pools of mortgage loans.  We generally acquire the commercial and multifamily mortgage loans from CGMRC or another of our affiliates or from another seller of commercial and multifamily mortgage loans, in each case in privately negotiated transactions.

After the issuance of a series of offered certificates, we may be required, to the extent specified in the related Governing Document, to perform certain actions on a continual basis, including but not limited to:

89

● to remove the trustee upon the occurrence of certain specified events, including certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency, failure to deliver certain required reports or failure to make certain distributions to the certificateholders required pursuant to the related Governing Document, and thereupon appoint a successor trustee;

● to appoint a successor trustee in the event the trustee resigns, is removed or becomes ineligible to continue serving in such capacity under the related Governing Document;

● to provide the trustee, the master servicer or the special servicer with any reports, certifications and information, other than with respect to the mortgage loans, that it may reasonably require to comply with the terms of the related Governing Document; and

● to provide to the related tax administrator in respect of the related trust such information as it may reasonably require to perform its reporting and other tax compliance obligations under the related Governing Document.

Generally, however, it is expected that the functions and/or duties set out under this “—The Depositor” section will be performed by our agents or affiliates.

Neither we nor any of our affiliates will insure or guarantee distributions on the certificates of any series offered by means of this prospectus and any related prospectus supplement.  The pooling and servicing agreement for each series will provide that the holders of the certificates for the series will have no rights or remedies against us or any of our affiliates for any losses or other claims in connection with any series of offered certificates or the underlying mortgage loans other than the repurchase or substitution of the mortgage loans by us or one of our affiliates, if and to the extent specifically disclosed in the related prospectus supplement.

The Issuing Entity

The issuing entity with respect to each series of offered certificates is the entity that will own and hold the related mortgage assets and in whose name those certificates will be issued.  Each issuing entity will be a statutory trust or a common law trust organized at our direction under the laws of the State of New York or other jurisdiction specified in the related prospectus supplement.  As described in the related prospectus supplement, the  Governing Document for each series of offered certificates will set forth the permissible activities and restrictions on the activities of the related issuing entity and will govern the servicing and administration of the related trust assets.  Each series of offered certificates will represent interests only in, and be payable solely from assets of, the related trust. However, a series of offered certificates may be issued together with other certificates of the same series, which other certificates will not be offered pursuant to this prospectus.  Accordingly, the assets of one of our trusts may back one or more classes of certificates other than the related offered certificates. The trust assets for each series will be held by the related trustee for the benefit of the related certificateholders.

The Originators

Some or all of the mortgage loans included in one of our trusts may be originated by CGMRC or by one of our other affiliates.  In addition, there may be other third-party originators of the mortgage loans to be included in one of our trusts.  Accordingly, we will acquire each of the mortgage loans to be included in one of our trusts from the originator or a subsequent assignee, in privately negotiated transactions.  See “Transaction Participants—The Sponsor.”  We will identify in the related prospectus supplement any originator or group of affiliated originators—apart from a sponsor and/or its affiliates—that will or is expected to originate mortgage loans representing 10% or more of the related mortgage asset pool, by balance.

90

DESCRIPTION OF THE GOVERNING DOCUMENTS

General

The “Governing Document” for purposes of issuing the offered certificates of each series will be a pooling and servicing agreement or other similar agreement or collection of agreements.  In general, the parties to the Governing Document for a series of offered certificates will include us, a trustee, one or more master servicers and one or more special servicers. However, if the related trust assets include mortgage-backed securities, the Governing Document may include a manager as a party, but may not include a master servicer, special servicer or other servicer as a party.  We will identify in the related prospectus supplement the parties to the Governing Document for the subject series of offered certificates.

If we so specify in the related prospectus supplement, the originator of the mortgage assets or a party from whom we acquire mortgage assets or one of their respective affiliates may perform the functions of master servicer, special servicer, sub-servicer or manager for the trust to which we transfer those assets.  The same person or entity may act as both master servicer and special servicer for one of our trusts.

Any party to the Governing Document for a series of offered certificates, or any of its affiliates, may own certificates issued thereunder.  However, except in limited circumstances, including with respect to required consents to amendments to the Governing Document for a series of offered certificates, certificates that are held by the related master servicer, special servicer or manager will not be allocated voting rights.

A form of a pooling and servicing agreement has been filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.  However, the provisions of the Governing Document for each series of offered certificates will vary depending upon the nature of the certificates to be issued thereunder and the nature of the related trust assets.  The following summaries describe select provisions that may appear in the Governing Document for each series of offered certificates.  The prospectus supplement for each series of offered certificates will provide material additional information regarding the Governing Document for that series.  The summaries in this prospectus do not purport to be complete, and you should refer to the provisions of the Governing Document for your offered certificates and, further, to the description of those provisions in the related prospectus supplement.  We will provide a copy of the Governing Document, exclusive of exhibits, that relates to your offered certificates, without charge, upon written request addressed to our principal executive offices specified under “Transaction Participants—The Depositor.”

Assignment of Mortgage Assets

At the time of initial issuance of any series of offered certificates, we will acquire and assign, or cause to be directly assigned, to the designated trustee those mortgage assets and any other assets to be included in the related trust fund.  We will specify in the related prospectus supplement all material documents to be delivered, and all other material actions to be taken, by us or any prior holder of the related mortgage assets in connection with that assignment.  We will also specify in the related prospectus supplement any remedies available to the related certificateholders, or the related trustee on their behalf, in the event that any of those material documents are not delivered or any of those other material actions are not taken as required.  Concurrently with that assignment, the related trustee will deliver to us or our designee the certificates of that series in exchange for the mortgage assets and the other assets to be included in the related trust.

Each mortgage asset included in one of our trusts will be identified in a schedule appearing as an exhibit to the related Governing Document.  That schedule generally will include detailed information about each mortgage asset transferred to the related trust, including:

● in the case of a mortgage loan—

91

1. the address of the related real property,

2. the mortgage interest rate and, if applicable, the applicable index, gross margin, adjustment date and any rate cap information,

3. the remaining term to maturity, the maturity date or the anticipated repayment date, and

4. the outstanding principal balance; and

● in the case of a mortgage-backed security—

1. the outstanding principal balance, and

2. the pass-through rate or coupon rate.

Representations and Warranties with Respect to Mortgage Assets

If and to the extent set forth in the prospectus supplement for any series of offered certificates, we will, with respect to each mortgage asset in the related trust, make or assign, or cause to be made or assigned, a limited set of representations and warranties covering, by way of example:

● the accuracy of the information set forth for each mortgage asset on the schedule of mortgage assets appearing as an exhibit to the Governing Document for that series;

● the warranting party’s title to each mortgage asset and the authority of the warranting party to sell that mortgage asset; and

● in the case of a mortgage loan—

1. the enforceability of the related mortgage note and mortgage,

2. the existence of title insurance insuring the lien priority of the related mortgage, and

3. the payment status of the mortgage loan.

We will identify the warranting party, and give a more detailed summary of the representations and warranties made thereby, in the related prospectus supplement.  In most cases, the warranting party will be a prior holder of the particular mortgage assets.  We will also specify in the related prospectus supplement any remedies against the warranting party available to the related certificateholders, or the related trustee on their behalf, in the event of a material breach of any of those representations and warranties.

Collection and Other Servicing Procedures with Respect to Mortgage Loans

The Governing Document for each series of offered certificates will govern the servicing and administration of any mortgage loans included in the related trust.

In general, the related master servicer and special servicer, directly or through sub-servicers, will be obligated to service and administer for the benefit of the related certificateholders the mortgage loans in any of our trusts.  The master servicer and the special servicer will be required to service and administer those mortgage loans in accordance with applicable law and, further, in accordance with the terms of the related Governing Document, the mortgage loans themselves and any instrument of credit support included in that trust.  Subject to the foregoing, the master servicer and the special servicer will each have full power and authority to do any and all things in connection with that servicing and administration that it may deem necessary and desirable.

92

As part of its servicing duties, each of the master servicer and the special servicer for one of our trusts will be required to make reasonable efforts to collect all payments called for under the terms and provisions of the related mortgage loans that it services.  In general, each of the master servicer and the special servicer for one of our trusts will be obligated to follow those collection procedures as are consistent with the servicing standard set forth in the related Governing Document.  Consistent with the foregoing, the master servicer and the special servicer will each be permitted, in its discretion, to waive any default interest or late payment charge in connection with collecting a late payment on any defaulted mortgage loan.

The master servicer and/or the special servicer for one or our trusts, directly or through sub-servicers, will also be required to perform various other customary functions of a servicer of comparable loans, including:

● maintaining escrow or impound accounts for the payment of taxes, insurance premiums, ground rents and similar items, or otherwise monitoring the timely payment of those items;

● ensuring that the related properties are properly insured;

● attempting to collect delinquent payments;

● supervising foreclosures;

● negotiating modifications;

● responding to borrower requests for partial releases of the encumbered property, easements, consents to alteration or demolition and similar matters;

● protecting the interests of certificateholders with respect to senior lienholders;

● conducting inspections of the related real properties on a periodic or other basis;

● collecting and evaluating financial statements for the related real properties;

● managing or overseeing the management of real properties acquired on behalf of the trust through foreclosure, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or otherwise; and

● maintaining servicing records relating to mortgage loans in the trust.

We will specify in the related prospectus supplement when, and the extent to which, servicing of a mortgage loan is to be transferred from a master servicer to a special servicer.  In general, a special servicer for any of our trusts will be responsible for the servicing and administration of:

● mortgage loans that are delinquent with respect to a specified number of scheduled payments;

● mortgage loans as to which there is a material non-monetary default;

● mortgage loans as to which the related borrower has—

1. entered into or consented to bankruptcy, appointment of a receiver or conservator or similar insolvency proceeding, or

2. become the subject of a decree or order for such a proceeding which has remained in force undischarged or unstayed for a specified number of days; and

93

● real properties acquired as part of the trust with respect to defaulted mortgage loans.

The related Governing Document may also provide that if, in the judgment of the related master servicer or other specified party, a payment default or a material non-monetary default is reasonably foreseeable, the related master servicer may elect or be required to transfer the servicing of that mortgage loan, in whole or in part, to the related special servicer.  When the circumstances no longer warrant a special servicer’s continuing to service a particular mortgage loan, such as when the related borrower is paying in accordance with the forbearance arrangement entered into between the special servicer and that borrower, the master servicer will generally resume the servicing duties with respect to the particular mortgage loan.

A borrower’s failure to make required mortgage loan payments may mean that operating income from the related real property is insufficient to service the mortgage debt, or may reflect the diversion of that income from the servicing of the mortgage debt.  In addition, a borrower that is unable to make mortgage loan payments may also be unable to make timely payment of taxes and otherwise to maintain and insure the related real property.  In general, with respect to each series of offered certificates, the related special servicer will be required to monitor any mortgage loan in the related trust that is in default, evaluate whether the causes of the default can be corrected over a reasonable period without significant impairment of the value of the related real property, initiate corrective action in cooperation with the mortgagor if cure is likely, inspect the related real property and take any other actions as it deems necessary and appropriate.  A significant period of time may elapse before a special servicer is able to assess the success of any corrective action or the need for additional initiatives.  The time period within which a special servicer can—

● make the initial determination of appropriate action,

● evaluate the success of corrective action,

● develop additional initiatives,

● institute foreclosure proceedings and actually foreclose, or

● accept a deed to a real property in lieu of foreclosure, on behalf of the certificateholders of the related series,

may vary considerably depending on the particular mortgage loan, the related real property, the borrower, the presence of an acceptable party to assume the mortgage loan and the laws of the jurisdiction in which the related real property is located.  If a borrower files a bankruptcy petition, the special servicer may not be permitted to accelerate the maturity of the defaulted loan or to foreclose on the related real property for a considerable period of time.  See “Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans—Bankruptcy Issues.”

A special servicer for one of our trusts may also perform limited duties with respect to mortgage loans in that trust for which the related master servicer is primarily responsible, such as—

● performing property inspections and collecting, and

● evaluating financial statements.

A master servicer for one of our trusts may perform limited duties with respect to any mortgage loan in that trust for which the related special servicer is primarily responsible, such as—

● continuing to receive payments on the mortgage loan,

● making calculations with respect to the mortgage loan, and

94

● making remittances and preparing reports to the related trustee and/or certificateholders with respect to the mortgage loan.

The duties of the master servicer and special servicer for your series will be more fully described in the related prospectus supplement.

If and to the extent set forth in the related prospectus supplement, the master servicer for your series will be responsible for filing and settling claims with respect to particular mortgage loans for your series under any applicable instrument of credit support.  See “Description of Credit Support” in this prospectus.

Servicing Mortgage Loans That Are Part of a Loan Combination

One or more of the mortgage loans that are included in any of our trusts may be part of a loan combination as described under “The Trust Fund—Mortgage Loans—Loan Combinations.”  With respect to any of those mortgage loans, the entire loan combination may be serviced under the applicable Governing Document for our trust, in which case the servicers under that Governing Document will have to service the loan combination with regard to and considering the interests of the holders of the non-trust mortgage loans included in the related loan combination.  With respect to one or more other mortgage loans in any of our trusts that are part of a loan combination, the entire loan combination may be serviced under a servicing agreement for the securitization of a related non-trust loan in that loan combination, in which case our servicers and the certificateholders of the related series of certificates will have limited ability to control the servicing of those mortgage loans.  In any event, the related non-trust mortgage loan noteholders may be permitted to exercise certain rights and direct certain servicing actions with respect to the entire loan combination, including the mortgage loan in one of our trusts.  See “Risk Factors—With Respect to Certain Mortgage Loans Included in Our Trusts, the Mortgaged Property or Properties that Secure the Subject Mortgage Loan in the Trust Also Secure One or More Related Mortgage Loans That Are Not in the Trust; The Interests of the Holders of Those Non-Trust Mortgage Loans May Conflict with Your Interests.”

Sub-Servicers

A master servicer or special servicer may delegate its servicing obligations to one or more third-party servicers and sub-servicers.  In addition, an originator or a seller of a mortgage loan may act as sub-servicer with respect to that mortgage loan after it is included in one of our trusts.  A sub-servicer engaged by the master servicer with respect to a particular mortgage loan will often have direct contact with the related borrower and may effectively perform all of the related servicing functions (other than special servicing functions), with related collections and reports being forwarded by the sub-servicer to the master servicer for aggregation of such items with the remaining mortgage pool.  However, unless we specify otherwise in the related prospectus supplement, the master servicer or special servicer will remain obligated for performance of the delegated duties under the related Governing Document.  Each sub-servicing agreement between a master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, and a sub-servicer must provide for servicing of the applicable mortgage loans consistent with the related Governing Document.

Unless we specify otherwise in the related prospectus supplement, any master servicer or special servicer for one of our trusts will be solely liable for all fees owed by it to any sub-servicer, regardless of whether the master servicer’s or special servicer’s compensation under the related Governing Document is sufficient to pay those fees.  Each sub-servicer will be entitled to reimbursement from the related trust, through the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, that retained it, for expenditures that it makes, generally to the same extent that such master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, would be reimbursed under the related Governing Document.

We will identify in the related prospectus supplement any sub-servicer that, at the time of initial issuance of the subject offered certificates, is affiliated with us or with the issuing entity or any sponsor for the subject

95

securitization transaction or is expected to be a servicer of mortgage loans representing 10% or more of the related mortgage asset pool, by balance.

Operating Advisor

If so specified in the related prospectus supplement, an operating advisor may be selected to approve, direct or consult with, the related special servicer as to recommendations of the related special servicer with respect to certain decisions relating to the servicing of the specially serviced mortgage loans. The related prospectus supplement will provide specific information with respect to the following matters: (i) the duration of the term of the operating advisor; (ii) the method of selection of the operating advisor; (iii) certain decisions as to which the operating advisor may be entitled to approve or consult regarding certain actions of the related special servicer (for example, foreclosure of a mortgaged property securing a specially serviced mortgage loan, modification of a specially serviced mortgage loan, and extension of the maturity of a specially serviced mortgage loan beyond a specified term) and (iv) the information, recommendations and reports to be provided to the operating advisor by the related special servicer.

Collection of Payments on Mortgage-Backed Securities

Unless we specify otherwise in the related prospectus supplement, if a mortgage-backed security is included among the trust assets underlying any series of offered certificates, then—

● that mortgage-backed security will be registered in the name of the related trustee or its designee;

● the related trustee will receive payments on that mortgage-backed security; and

● subject to any conditions described in the related prospectus supplement, the related trustee or a designated manager will, on behalf and at the expense of the trust, exercise all rights and remedies with respect to that mortgaged-backed security, including the prosecution of any legal action necessary in connection with any payment default.

Advances

If any trust established by us includes mortgage loans, then as and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, the related master servicer, the related special servicer, the related trustee, any related provider of credit support and/or any other specified person may be obligated to make, or may have the option of making, advances with respect to those mortgage loans to cover—

● delinquent payments of principal and/or interest, other than balloon payments,

● property protection expenses,

● other servicing expenses, or

● any other items specified in the related prospectus supplement.

If there are any limitations with respect to a party’s advancing obligations, we will discuss those limitations in the related prospectus supplement.

96

Advances are intended to maintain a regular flow of scheduled interest and principal payments to certificateholders.  Advances are not a guarantee against losses.  The advancing party will be entitled to recover all of its advances out of—

● subsequent recoveries on the related mortgage loans, including amounts drawn under any fund or instrument constituting credit support, and

● any other specific sources identified in the related prospectus supplement.

If and to the extent that we so specify in the related prospectus supplement, any entity making advances will be entitled to receive interest on some or all of those advances for a specified period during which they are outstanding at the rate specified in that prospectus supplement.  That entity may be entitled to payment of interest on its outstanding advances—

● periodically from general collections on the mortgage assets in the related trust, prior to any payment to the related series of certificateholders, or

● at any other times and from any sources as we may describe in the related prospectus supplement.

If any trust established by us includes mortgage-backed securities, we will discuss in the related prospectus supplement any comparable advancing obligations with respect to those securities or the mortgage loans that back them.

Matters Regarding the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Manager and Us

Unless we specify otherwise in the related prospectus supplement, the master servicer, special servicer or manager for any of our trusts may each resign from its obligations in that capacity, upon—

● the appointment of, and the acceptance of that appointment by, a successor to the resigning party and receipt by the related trustee of written confirmation from each applicable rating agency that the resignation and appointment will not result in a withdrawal or downgrade of any rating assigned by that rating agency to any class of certificates of the related series, or

● a determination that those obligations are no longer permissible under applicable law or are in material conflict by reason of applicable law with any other activities carried on by the resigning party.

In general, no resignation will become effective until the related trustee or other successor has assumed the obligations and duties of the resigning master servicer, special servicer or manager, as the case may be.  The appointment of a successor master servicer may require our consent, but if we have not responded to a request for consent to a successor within the requisite time period, that consent may be deemed to have been given.  If the duties of the master servicer or the special servicer are transferred to a successor thereto, then (except as otherwise described in the related prospectus supplement) any related master servicing compensation or special servicing compensation, as applicable, that accrues or otherwise becomes payable under the Governing Document from and after the date of such transfer will generally be payable to such successor.  Unless otherwise specified in the related prospectus supplement, the Governing Document will require the resigning master servicer or special servicer to pay all costs and expenses in connection with such resignation and the resulting transfer of servicing.

With respect to each series of offered certificates, we and the related master servicer, special servicer and/or manager, if any, will, in each case, be obligated to perform only those duties specifically required under the related Governing Document.

97

In no event will we, any master servicer, special servicer or manager for one of our trusts, or any of our or their respective members, managers, directors, officers, employees or agents, be under any liability to that trust or the related certificateholders for any action taken, or not taken, in good faith under the related Governing Document or for errors in judgment. However, subject to any exceptions disclosed in the related prospectus supplement, neither we nor any of those other parties to the related Governing Document will be protected against any liability that would otherwise be imposed by reason of—

● willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of obligations or duties under the related Governing Document for any series of offered certificates, or

● reckless disregard of those obligations and duties.

Furthermore, the Governing Document for each series of offered certificates will entitle us, the master servicer, special servicer and/or manager for the related trust, and our and their respective  members, managers, directors, officers, employees and agents, to indemnification out of the related trust assets for any loss, liability or expense incurred in connection with that Governing Document or series of offered certificates or the related trust.  However, subject to any exceptions disclosed in the related prospectus supplement, the indemnification will not extend to any such loss, liability or expense:

● specifically required to be borne by the relevant party, without right of reimbursement, under the terms of that Governing Document;

● incurred in connection with any breach on the part of the relevant party of a representation or warranty made in that Governing Document; or

● incurred by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of, or reckless disregard of, obligations or duties on the part of the relevant party under that Governing Document.

Neither we nor any master servicer, special servicer or manager for the related trust will be under any obligation to appear in, prosecute or defend any legal action unless:

● the action is related to the respective responsibilities of that party under the Governing Document for the affected series of offered certificates; and

● either—

1. that party is specifically required to bear the expense of the action, or

2. the action will not, in its opinion, involve that party in any ultimate expense or liability for which it would not be reimbursed under the Governing Document for the affected series of offered certificates.

However, we and each of those other parties may undertake any legal action that we or any of them may deem necessary or desirable with respect to the enforcement or protection of the rights and duties of the parties to the Governing Document for any series of offered certificates and the interests of the certificateholders of that series under that Governing Document.  In that event, the legal expenses and costs of the action, and any liability resulting from the action, will be expenses, costs and liabilities of the related trust and payable out of related trust assets.

98

With limited exception, any person or entity—

● into which we or any related master servicer, special servicer or manager may be merged or consolidated, or

● resulting from any merger or consolidation to which we or any related master servicer, special servicer or manager is a party, or

● succeeding to all or substantially all of our business or the business of any related master servicer, special servicer or manager,

will be the successor of us or that master servicer, special servicer or manager, as the case may be, under the Governing Document for a series of offered certificates.

The compensation arrangements with respect to any master servicer, special servicer or manager for any of our trusts will be set forth in the related prospectus supplement.  In general, that compensation will be payable out of the related trust assets.

Fidelity Bonds and Errors and Omissions Insurance

The Governing Document for a series of offered certificates may require that the master servicer and the special servicer, if any, obtain and maintain in effect a fidelity bond or similar form of insurance coverage (which may provide blanket coverage) or a combination of fidelity bond and insurance coverage insuring against loss occasioned by fraud, theft or other intentional misconduct of the officers, employees and agents of the master servicer or the special servicer, as the case may be. The Governing Document for a series of offered certificates may allow the master servicer and the special servicer, if any, to self-insure against loss occasioned by the errors and omissions of the officers, employees and agents of the master servicer or special servicer, as the case may be, so long as certain criteria set forth in the Governing Document are met.

Termination Events

We will identify in the related prospectus supplement the various events under the Governing Document for each series of offered certificates for which any related master servicer, special servicer or manager may be terminated in that capacity.  Unless otherwise specified in the related prospectus supplement, the Governing Document for each series of offered certificates will provide that if the master servicer, special servicer or manager is terminated as a result of any such event, and if certain specified other parties to that Governing Document actually incur any reasonable third-party costs or expenses in connection with transferring mortgage files, servicing files and related information, records and reports to the successor master servicer, special servicer or manager and amending the related Governing Document to reflect (as well as providing appropriate notices to mortgagors, ground lessors, insurers and other applicable third parties regarding) such succession, then those costs and expenses of such other non-terminated party must be borne by the terminated party, and if not paid by the terminated party within 90 days after the presentation of reasonable documentation of such costs and expenses, such non-terminated party will be entitled to indemnification for those costs and expenses from the related trust fund, although the terminated party will not thereby be relieved of its liability for those costs and expenses.

99

Amendment

Under the circumstances described in the related prospectus supplement, the Governing Document for each series of offered certificates may be amended by the parties thereto, without the consent of any of the holders of those certificates, or of any non-offered certificates of the same series.

In general, except as otherwise specified in the related prospectus supplement, the Governing Document for a series of offered certificates may also be amended by the parties to that document, with the consent of the holders of offered and non-offered certificates representing, in total, not less than 51%, or any other percentage or portion specified in the related prospectus supplement, of the voting rights allocated to those classes of that series that are affected by the amendment.

The Governing Document relating to each series of certificates may provide that no amendment to the Governing Document will be made unless there has been delivered in accordance therewith an opinion of counsel to the effect that the amendment will not cause the applicable trust to fail to qualify as a REMIC or grantor trust at any time that any of the related certificates are outstanding or cause a tax to be imposed on the trust under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.

The prospectus supplement for a series of certificates may describe other or different provisions concerning the amendment of the related Governing Document.

List of Certificateholders

Unless otherwise specified in the related prospectus supplement, upon written request of any certificateholder of record of any series made for purposes of communicating with other holders of certificates of the same series with respect to their rights under the related Governing Document, the related trustee or other certificate registrar of that series will furnish the requesting certificateholder with a list of the other certificateholders of record of that series identified in the certificate register at the time of the request.  However, the trustee or other certificate registrar may first require a copy of the communication that the requesting certificateholder proposes to send and may require the requesting certificateholder to cover the expense of the trustee or other certificate registrar providing that list.

Eligibility Requirements for the Trustee

The trustee for each series of offered certificates will be named in the related prospectus supplement.

The trustee for a series of offered certificates is at all times required to be a bank, association, corporation or trust company organized and doing business under the laws of the U.S. or any State of the U.S. or the District of Columbia.  In addition, the trustee must at all times—

● be authorized under those laws to exercise trust powers;

● with limited exception, have a combined capital and surplus of at least $50,000,000; and

● be subject to supervision or examination by federal or state authority.

If the bank, association, corporation or trust company in question publishes reports of condition at least annually, in accordance with law or the requirements of the supervising or examining authority, then the combined capital and surplus of that bank, banking association, banking corporation or trust company will be deemed to be its combined capital and surplus as described in its most recent published report of condition.

100

The bank, association, corporation or trust company that serves as trustee for any series of offered certificates may have typical banking relationships with us and our affiliates and with any of the other parties to the related Governing Document and its affiliates.

Duties of the Trustee

In general, the trustee for a series of offered certificates will be required to perform only those duties specifically required under the related Governing Document.  However, upon receipt of any of the various certificates, reports or other instruments required to be furnished to it under the related Governing Document, the trustee must examine those documents and determine whether they conform to the requirements of that Governing Document.

The trustee for a series of offered certificates will not—

● make any representation as to the validity or sufficiency of those certificates, the related Governing Document or any underlying mortgage asset or related document, or

● be accountable for the use or application by or on behalf of any other party to the related Governing Document of any funds paid to that party with respect to those certificates or the underlying mortgage assets.

The trustee for each series of offered certificates will be entitled to execute any of its trusts or powers and perform any of its duties under the related Governing Document, either directly or by or through agents or attorneys.  However, the trustee will remain responsible for the acts and omissions of any such agent or attorney acting within the scope of its employment to the same extent as it is responsible for its own acts and omissions under the related Governing Document.

In addition, for purposes of meeting the legal requirements of some local jurisdictions, the trustee will have the power to appoint a co-trustee or separate trustee of all or any part of the trust assets.  All rights, powers, duties and obligations conferred or imposed upon the trustee will be conferred or imposed upon the trustee and the separate trustee or co-trustee jointly, or in any jurisdiction in which the trustee is incompetent or unqualified to perform some acts, singly upon the separate trustee or co-trustee will exercise and perform its rights, powers, duties and obligations solely at the direction of the trustee.

Rights, Protections, Indemnities and Immunities of the Trustee

As and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, the fees and normal disbursements of the trustee for any series of offered certificates may be the expense of the related master servicer or other specified person or may be required to be paid out of the related trust assets.

The trustee for each series of offered certificates and each of its directors, officers, employees, affiliates, agents and control persons will be entitled to indemnification, out of related trust assets, for any loss, liability or expense incurred by that trustee or any of those other persons in connection with that trustee’s acceptance or administration of its trusts under the related Governing Document.  However, the indemnification of a trustee will not extend to any loss, liability or expense incurred by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence on the part of the trustee in the performance of its obligations and duties under the related Governing Document.

No trustee for any series of offered certificates will be liable for any action taken, suffered or omitted by it in good faith and believed by it to be authorized, or within the discretion or rights or powers conferred on it, by the related Governing Document.  Furthermore, no trustee for any series of offered certificates will be liable for an error in judgment, unless the trustee was negligent in ascertaining the pertinent facts.

101

The trustee for a series of offered certificates may rely upon and will be protected in acting or refraining from acting upon any resolution, officer’s certificate, certificate of auditors or any other certificate, statement, instrument, opinion, report, notice, request, consent, order, appraisal, bond or other paper or document reasonably believed by it to be genuine and to have been signed or presented by the proper party or parties.  In addition, the trustee for a series of offered certificates may consult with counsel and the written advice of such counsel or any opinion of counsel will be full and complete authorization and protection in respect of any action taken or suffered or omitted by it under the related Governing Document in good faith and in accordance therewith.

No trustee for any series of offered certificates will be under any obligation to exercise any of the trusts or powers vested in it by the related Governing Document, or to make any investigation of matters arising under that Governing Document or to institute, conduct or defend any litigation under or in relation to that Governing Document, at the request, order or direction of any of the certificateholders of that series, pursuant to the provisions of that Governing Document, unless those certificateholders have offered the trustee reasonable security or indemnity against the costs, expenses and liabilities that may be incurred as a result.

No trustee for any series of offered certificates will be required to expend or risk its own funds or otherwise incur any financial liability in the performance of any of its duties under the related Governing Document, or in the exercise of any of its rights or powers, if it has reasonable grounds for believing that repayment of those funds or adequate indemnity against that risk or liability is not reasonably assured to it.

The protections, immunities and indemnities afforded to the trustee for one of our trusts will also be available to it in its capacity as, and to any other person or entity appointed by it to act as, authenticating agent, certificate registrar, tax administrator, certificate administrator and custodian for that trust.

Resignation and Removal of the Trustee

The trustee for any series of offered certificates may resign at any time by giving written notice thereof to, among others, us.  Upon receiving that notice, we or the related master servicer or manager, as applicable, will be obligated to appoint a successor to a resigning trustee.  If no successor trustee has been appointed and has accepted appointment within a specified period after the giving of that notice of resignation, the resigning trustee may petition any court of competent jurisdiction for the appointment of a successor trustee.

In general, if, among other things—

● the trustee ceases to be eligible to act in that capacity under the related Governing Document and fails to resign after we or the master servicer make a written request for the trustee to resign, or

● the trustee becomes incapable of acting in that capacity under the related Governing Document, or is adjudged bankrupt or insolvent, or a receiver of the trustee or of its property is appointed, or any public officer takes charge or control of the trustee or of its property or affairs for the purpose of rehabilitation, conservation or liquidation,

then (unless otherwise specified in the related prospectus supplement) we may remove the trustee and appoint a successor trustee.

In addition, unless we indicate otherwise in the related prospectus supplement, the holders of the offered and non-offered certificates of a subject series of certificates evidencing more than 50%—or any other percentage specified in the related prospectus supplement—of the voting rights for that series may at any time remove the trustee and appoint a successor trustee.

In the event that the trustee for any series of offered certificates is terminated or removed, all of its rights and obligations under the related Governing Document and in and to the related trust assets will be terminated,

102

other than any rights or obligations that accrued prior to the date of such termination or removal, including the right to receive all fees, expenses, advances, interest on advances and other amounts accrued or owing to it under the Governing Document with respect to periods prior to the date of such termination or removal, and no termination without cause will be effective until the payment of those amounts to the outgoing trustee.  Any resignation or removal of a trustee and appointment of a successor trustee will not become effective until acceptance of appointment by the successor trustee.  The Governing Document will generally provide that the predecessor trustee is required to deliver to the successor trustee for any series of offered certificates all documents related to the mortgage assets held by it or its agent and statements held by it under the related Governing Document.

Unless otherwise specified in the related prospectus supplement, the Governing Document will also generally provide that if a trustee thereunder resigns or is terminated or removed, then any and all costs and expenses associated with transferring the duties of that trustee to a successor trustee, including those associated with the transfer of mortgage files and other documents and statements held by the predecessor trustee to the successor trustee, are to be paid:  (a) by the predecessor trustee, if such predecessor trustee has resigned or been removed with cause, including by us as described in the third preceding paragraph; (b) by the certificateholders that effected the removal, if the predecessor trustee has been removed without cause by certificateholders of the subject series as described in the second preceding paragraph; and (c) out of the related trust assets, if such costs and expenses are not paid by the predecessor trustee or the subject certificateholders, as contemplated by the immediately preceding clauses (a) and (b), within a specified period after they are incurred (except that such predecessor trustee or such subject certificateholders, as applicable, will remain liable to the related trust for those costs and expenses).

DESCRIPTION OF THE CERTIFICATES

General

Each series of offered certificates, together with any non-offered certificates of the same series, will represent the entire beneficial ownership interest in a trust created at our direction.  Each series of offered certificates will consist of one or more classes.  Any non-offered certificates of that series will likewise consist of one or more classes.

A series of certificates consists of all those certificates that—

● have the same series designation;

● were issued under the same Governing Document; and

● represent beneficial ownership interests in the same trust.

A class of certificates consists of all those certificates of a particular series that—

● have the same class designation; and

● have the same payment terms.

The respective classes of offered and non-offered certificates of any series may have a variety of payment terms.  An offered certificate may entitle the holder to receive:

● a stated principal amount, which will be represented by its principal balance, if any;

103

● interest on a principal balance or notional amount, at a fixed, floating, adjustable or variable pass-through rate, which pass-through rate may change as of a specified date or upon the occurrence of specified events as described in the related prospectus supplement;

● specified, fixed or variable portions of the interest, principal or other amounts received on the related mortgage assets;

● payments of principal, with disproportionate, nominal or no payments of interest;

● payments of interest, with disproportionate, nominal or no payments of principal;

● payments of interest on a deferred or partially deferred basis, which deferred interest may be added to the principal balance, if any, of the subject class of offered certificates or which deferred interest may or may not itself accrue interest, all as set forth in the related prospectus supplement;

● payments of interest or principal that commence only as of a specified date or only after the occurrence of specified events, such as the payment in full of the interest and principal outstanding on one or more other classes of certificates of the same series;

● payments of interest or principal that are, in whole or in part, calculated based on or payable specifically or primarily from payments or other collections on particular related mortgage assets;

● payments of principal to be made, from time to time or for designated periods, at a rate that is—

1. faster and, in some cases, substantially faster, or

2. slower and, in some cases, substantially slower,

than the rate at which payments or other collections of principal are received on the related mortgage assets;

● payments of principal to be made, subject to available funds, based on a specified principal payment schedule or other methodology;

● payments of principal that may be accelerated or slowed in response to a change in the rate of principal payments on the related mortgage assets in order to protect the subject class of offered certificates or, alternatively, to protect one or more other classes of certificates of the same series from prepayment and/or extension risk;

● payments of principal out of amounts other than payments or other collections of principal on the related mortgage assets, such as excess spread on the related mortgage assets or amounts otherwise payable as interest with respect to another class of certificates of the same series, which other class of certificates provides for the deferral of interest payments thereon;

● payments of residual amounts remaining after required payments have been made with respect to other classes of certificates of the same series; or

● payments of all or part of the prepayment or repayment premiums, fees and charges, equity participation payments or other specified items or amounts received on the related mortgage assets.

104

Any class of offered certificates may be senior or subordinate to or pari passu with one or more other classes of certificates of the same series, including a non-offered class of certificates of that series, for purposes of some or all payments and/or allocations of losses or other shortfalls.

A class of offered certificates may have two or more component parts, each having characteristics that are described in this prospectus as being attributable to separate and distinct classes.  For example, a class of offered certificates may have a total principal balance on which it accrues interest at a fixed, floating, adjustable or variable rate.  That class of offered certificates may also accrue interest on a total notional amount at a different fixed, floating, adjustable or variable rate.  In addition, a class of offered certificates may accrue interest on one portion of its total principal balance or notional amount at one fixed, floating, adjustable or variable rate and on another portion of its total principal balance or notional amount at a different fixed, floating, adjustable or variable rate.  Furthermore, a class of offered certificates may be senior to another class of certificates of the same series in some respects, such as receiving payments out of payments and other collections on particular related mortgage assets, but subordinate in other respects, such as receiving payments out of the payments and other collections on different related mortgage assets.

Each class of offered certificates will be issued in minimum denominations corresponding to specified principal balances, notional amounts or percentage interests, as described in the related prospectus supplement.  A class of offered certificates may be issued in fully registered, definitive form and evidenced by physical certificates or may be issued in book-entry form through the facilities of The Depository Trust Company.  Offered certificates held in fully registered, definitive form may be transferred or exchanged, subject to any restrictions on transfer described in the related prospectus supplement, at the location specified in the related prospectus supplement, without the payment of any service charges, except for any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection with the transfer or exchange.  Interests in offered certificates held in book-entry form will be transferred on the book-entry records of DTC and its participating organizations.  If we so specify in the related prospectus supplement, we will arrange for clearance and settlement through Clearstream Banking, société anonyme or the Euroclear System, for so long as they are participants in DTC.

Investor Requirements and Transfer Restrictions

A Governing Document may impose minimum standards, restrictions or suitability requirements regarding potential investors in purchasing the subject offered certificates and/or restrictions on ownership or transfer of the subject offered certificates.  If so, we will discuss any such standards, restrictions and/or requirements in the related prospectus supplement if and to the extent that we do not already do so in this prospectus.

Payments on the Certificates

General.  Payments on a series of offered certificates may occur monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, semi-annually, annually or at any other specified interval.  Payments and other collections on or with respect to the related mortgage assets will be the primary source of funds payable on a series of offered certificates.  In the prospectus supplement for each series of offered certificates, we will identify:

● the frequency of distributions on, and the periodic distribution date for, that series,

● the relevant collection period, which may vary from mortgage asset to mortgage asset, for payments and other collections on or with respect to the related mortgage assets that are payable on that series on any particular distribution date; and

● the record date as of which certificateholders entitled to payments on any particular distribution date will be established.

105

All payments with respect to a class of offered certificates on any distribution date will be allocated pro rata among the outstanding certificates of that class in proportion to the respective principal balances, notional amounts or percentage interests, as the case may be, of those certificates.  Payments on an offered certificate will be made to the holder entitled thereto either—

● by wire transfer of immediately available funds to the account of that holder at a bank or similar entity, provided that the holder has furnished the party making the payments with wiring instructions no later than the applicable record date or, in most cases, a specified number of days—generally not more than five—prior to that date, and has satisfied any other conditions specified in the related prospectus supplement, or

● by check mailed to the address of that holder as it appears in the certificate register, in all other cases.

In general, the final payment on any offered certificate will be made only upon presentation and surrender of that certificate at the location specified to the holder in notice of final payment.

In connection with the offering and issuance of each series of offered certificates, we will include the following information in the related prospectus supplement:

● the flow of funds for the transaction, including the payment allocations, rights and distribution priorities among all classes of the subject offered certificates, and within each class of those offered certificates, with respect to cash flows;

● any specified changes to the transaction structure that would be triggered upon a default or event of default on the related trust assets or the failure to make any required payment on any class of certificates of the subject series, such as a change in distribution priority among classes;

● any credit enhancement or other support and any other structural features designed to enhance credit, facilitate the timely payment of monies due on the mortgage assets or owing to certificateholders, adjust the rate of return on those offered certificates, or preserve monies that will or might be distributed to certificateholders;

● how cash held pending distribution or other uses is held and invested, the length of time cash will be held pending distributions to certificateholders, the identity of the party or parties with access to cash balances and the authority to invest cash balances, the identity of the party or parties making decisions regarding the deposit, transfer or disbursement of mortgage asset cash flows and whether there will be any independent verification of the transaction accounts or account activity; and

● an itemized list (in tabular format) of fees and expenses to be paid or payable out of the cash flows from the related mortgage assets.

In the flow of funds discussion in any prospectus supplement, we  will provide information regarding any directing of cash flows from the trust assets – such as to reserve accounts, cash collateral accounts or expenses – and the purpose and operation of those requirements.

Payments of Interest.  In the case of each class of interest-bearing offered certificates, interest will accrue from time to time, at the applicable pass-through rate and in accordance with the applicable interest accrual method, on the total outstanding principal balance or notional amount of that class.  However, in some cases, the interest payable with respect to a class of interest-bearing offered certificates will equal a specified percentage or other specified portion, calculated as described in the related prospectus supplement, of the interest accrued or

106

payable, as applicable, on some or all of the related mortgage assets or on one or more particular related mortgage assets.

The pass-through rate for a class of interest-bearing offered certificates may be fixed, floating, adjustable or variable.  For example, the pass-through rate for a class of interest-bearing offered certificates may be:

● a specified fixed rate;

● a rate based on the interest rate for a particular related mortgage asset;

● a rate based on a weighted average of the interest rates for some or all of the related mortgage assets, except that for purposes of calculating that weighted average rate any or all of the underlying rates may first be subject to a cap or floor or be increased or decreased by a specified spread or percentage or by a spread or percentage calculated based on a specified formula, with any such underlying rate adjustments permitted to vary from mortgage asset to mortgage asset or, in the case of any particular mortgage asset, from one accrual or payment period to another;

● a rate that resets periodically based upon, and that varies either directly or indirectly with, the value from time to time of a designated objective index, such as the London interbank offered rate, a particular prime lending rate, a particular Treasury rate, the average cost of funds of one or more financial institutions or other similar index rate, as determined from time to time as set forth in the related prospectus supplement;

● a rate that is equal to the product of (a) a rate described in any of the foregoing bullets in this sentence, multiplied by (b) a specified percentage or a percentage calculated based on a specified formula, which specified percentage or specified formula may vary from one accrual or payment period to another;

● a rate that is equal to (a) a rate described in any of the foregoing bullets in this sentence, increased or decreased by (b) a specified spread or a spread calculated based on a specified formula, which specified spread or specified formula may vary from one accrual or payment period to another;

● a floating, adjustable or otherwise variable rate that is described in any of the foregoing bullets in this sentence, except that it is limited by (a) a cap or ceiling that establishes either a maximum rate or a maximum number of basis points by which the rate may increase from one accrual or payment period to another or over the life of the subject offered certificates or (b) a floor that establishes either a minimum rate or a maximum number of basis points by which the rate may decrease from one accrual or payment period to another or over the life of the subject offered certificates;

● a rate that is described in any of the foregoing bullets in this sentence, except that it is subject to a limit on the amount of interest to be paid on the subject offered certificates in any accrual or payment period that is based on the total amount available for distribution;

● the highest, lowest or average of any two or more of the rates described in the foregoing bullets in this sentence, or the differential between any two of the rates described in the foregoing bullets in this sentence; or

● a rate that is based on (a) one fixed rate during one or more accrual or payment periods and a different fixed rate or rates, or any other rate or rates described in any of the foregoing bullets in this sentence, during other accrual or payment periods or (b) a floating, adjustable or otherwise variable rate described in any of the foregoing bullets in this sentence, during one or more accrual

107

or payment periods and a fixed rate or rates, or a different floating, adjustable or otherwise variable rate or rates described in any of the foregoing bullets in this sentence, during other accrual or payment periods.

We will specify in the related prospectus supplement the pass-through rate for each class of interest-bearing offered certificates or, in the case of a floating, adjustable or variable pass-through rate, the method for determining that pass-through rate and how frequently it will be determined.  If the rate to be paid with respect to any class of offered certificates can be a combination of two or more rates, we will provide information in the related prospectus supplement regarding each of those rates and when it applies.

Interest may accrue with respect to any offered certificate on the basis of:

● a 360-day year consisting of 12 30-day months,

● the actual number of days elapsed during each relevant period in a year assumed to consist of 360 days,

● the actual number of days elapsed during each relevant period in a normal calendar year, or

● any other method identified in the related prospectus supplement.

We will identify the interest accrual method for each class of offered certificates in the related prospectus supplement.

Subject to available funds and any adjustments to interest entitlements described in the related prospectus supplement, accrued interest with respect to each class of interest-bearing offered certificates will normally be payable on each distribution date.  However, in the case of some classes of interest-bearing offered certificates, payments of accrued interest will only begin on a particular distribution date or under the circumstances described in the related prospectus supplement.  Prior to that time, the amount of accrued interest otherwise payable on that class will be added to its total principal balance on each date or otherwise deferred as described in the related prospectus supplement.

If a class of offered certificates accrues interest on a total notional amount, that total notional amount, in general, will be either:

● based on the principal balances of some or all of the related mortgage assets; or

● equal to the total principal balances of one or more other classes of certificates of the same series.

Reference to the notional amount of any certificate is solely for convenience in making calculations of interest and does not represent the right to receive any payments of principal.

We will describe in the related prospectus supplement the extent to which the amount of accrued interest that is payable on, or that may be added to the total principal balance of, a class of interest-bearing offered certificates may be reduced as a result of any contingencies, including shortfalls in interest collections due to prepayments, delinquencies, losses and deferred interest on the related mortgage assets.

Payments of Principal.  An offered certificate may or may not have a principal balance.  If it does, that principal balance outstanding from time to time will represent the maximum amount that the holder of that certificate will be entitled to receive as principal out of the future cash flow on the related mortgage assets and the other related trust assets.

108

The total outstanding principal balance of any class of offered certificates will be reduced by—

● payments of principal actually made to the holders of that class, and

● if and to the extent that we so specify in the related prospectus supplement, losses of principal on the related mortgage assets that are allocated to or are required to be borne by that class.

A class of interest-bearing offered certificates may provide that payments of accrued interest will only begin on a particular distribution date or under the circumstances described in the related prospectus supplement.  If so, the total outstanding principal balance of that class may be increased by the amount of any interest accrued, but not currently payable, on that class.

We will describe in the related prospectus supplement any other adjustments to the total outstanding principal balance of a class of offered certificates.

We will specify the expected initial total principal balance of each class of offered certificates in the related prospectus supplement.  Unless we so state in the related prospectus supplement, the initial total principal balance of a series of certificates will not be greater than the total outstanding principal balance of the related mortgage assets transferred by us to the related trust.  If applicable, we will express, as a percentage, in the related prospectus supplement, the extent to which the initial total principal balance of a series of certificates is greater than or less than the total outstanding principal balance of the related mortgage assets that we transfer to the related trust.

The payments of principal to be made on a series of offered certificates from time to time will, in general, be a function of the payments, other collections and advances of principal received or made with respect to the related mortgage assets.  Payments of principal on a series of offered certificates may also be made from the following sources:

● amounts attributable to interest accrued but not currently payable on one or more other classes of certificates of the applicable series;

● interest received or advanced on the underlying mortgage assets that is in excess of the interest currently accrued on the certificates of the applicable series;

● prepayment premiums, fees and charges, payments from equity participations or any other amounts received on the underlying mortgage assets that do not constitute interest or principal; or

● any other amounts described in the related prospectus supplement.

We will describe in the related prospectus supplement the principal entitlement of each class of offered certificates on each distribution date, including any principal distribution schedules and formulas for calculating principal distributions from cash flows on the trust assets.  Payment priorities among, principal distribution schedules for and formulas for calculating principal distributions from cash flows on the related trust assets with respect to various classes of certificates of any particular series may be affected by and/or subject to change based upon defaults and/or losses with respect to the related trust assets or one or more particular trust assets and/or liquidation, amortization, performance or similar triggers or events with respect to the related trust assets or one or more particular trust assets.  We will identify in the related prospectus supplement the rights of certificateholders and changes to the transaction structure or flow of funds in response to the events or triggers described in the preceding sentence.

The offered certificates will not have maturity dates in a traditional sense, and it will not be an event of default if a class of offered certificates is not paid in full by a specified date.  However, if the offered certificates

109

of any particular class or series are not paid in full by a specified date, then,  as and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, the applicable Governing Document may provide for a liquidation of a sufficient amount of related mortgage assets to retire that class or series.

Allocation of Losses and Shortfalls

If and to the extent that any losses or shortfalls in collections on the mortgage assets in any of our trusts are not covered or offset by delinquency advances or draws on any reserve fund or under any instrument of credit support, they will be allocated among the various classes of certificates of the related series in the priority and manner, and subject to the limitations, specified in the related prospectus supplement.  As described in the related prospectus supplement, the allocations may be effected as follows:

● by reducing the entitlements to interest and/or the total principal balances of one or more of those classes; and/or

● by establishing a priority of payments among those classes.

Different types of losses and shortfalls, or losses and/or shortfalls with respect to different mortgage assets, may be allocated differently among the various classes of certificates of the related series.

See “Description of Credit Support.”

Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference; Reports Filed with the SEC

All documents filed by us with the SEC with respect to a trust and relating to a series of offered certificates, after the date of this prospectus and before the end of the related offering, pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, are deemed incorporated by reference into this prospectus and are a part of this prospectus from the date of their filing.  Information contained in a document subsequently filed and incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference in this prospectus will modify or supersede different information contained in this prospectus—or in the related prospectus supplement—or in any other previously filed document that also is incorporated by reference in this prospectus.  Any statement so modified or superseded shall not, except as so modified or superseded, constitute a part of this prospectus.

We or another transaction party on behalf of the trust for a series of offered certificates will file the reports required under the Securities Act and under Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, including:

● Reports on Form 8-K (Current Report), following the issuance of the series of certificates of the related trust fund, including as Exhibits to the Form 8-K, various agreements or other documents specified in the related prospectus supplement, if applicable;

● Reports on Form 8-K (Current Report), following the occurrence of events specified in Form 8-K requiring disclosure, which are required to be filed within the time-frame specified in Form 8-K related to the type of event;

● Reports on Form 10-D (Asset-Backed Issuer Distribution Report), containing the distribution and pool performance information required on Form 10-D, which are required to be filed 15 days following each related distribution date; and

● Report on Form 10-K (Annual Report), containing the items specified in Form 10-K with respect to a fiscal year and filing or furnishing, as appropriate, the required exhibits and the certification delivered pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

110

Unless specifically stated in the report, the reports and any information included in the report will neither be examined nor reported on by an independent public accountant.  Each of our trusts will have a separate file number assigned by the SEC, which will be comprised of a series number preceded by the Securities Act registration number set forth under “Available Information.” Reports filed with the SEC with respect to one of our trusts after the final prospectus supplement is filed will be available under that trust’s specific file number, which will be set forth in the final prospectus supplement related to the applicable series.

We anticipate that, with respect to each of our trusts, the annual reports on Form 10-K, the distribution reports on Form 10-D, the current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act will be made available on the website of the related trustee or the website of such other transaction party as may be identified in the prospectus supplement for the related series of offered certificates, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.  If this is the case, we will identify in the related prospectus supplement the address of that website.  If the foregoing reports will not be made available in this manner, then we will, in the related prospectus supplement, state whether an identified transaction party voluntarily will provide electronic or paper copies of the subject filings free of charge upon request.

We will, or will cause another transaction party to, provide to each person, including any beneficial owner, to whom this prospectus is delivered in connection with any offered certificates, free of charge upon written or oral request, a copy of any and all of the information that is incorporated by reference in this prospectus but not delivered with this prospectus.  Unless we state otherwise in the related prospectus supplement, requests for this information should be made to us at Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013 (phone: 1-877-858-5407).

Reports to Certificateholders

On or about each distribution date, the related master servicer, manager or trustee or another specified party will forward, upon request, or otherwise make available, to each offered certificateholder a statement substantially in the form, or specifying the information, set forth in the related prospectus supplement.  In general, that statement will include information regarding—

● the payments made on that distribution date with respect to the applicable class of offered certificates, and

● the recent performance of the mortgage assets.

Within a reasonable period of time after the end of each calendar year, upon request, the related master servicer, manager or trustee or another specified party, as the case may be, will be required to furnish to each person who at any time during the calendar year was a holder of an offered certificate a statement containing information regarding the principal, interest and other amounts paid on the applicable class of offered certificates, aggregated for—

● that calendar year, or

● the applicable portion of that calendar year during which the person was a certificateholder.

The obligation to provide that annual statement will be deemed to have been satisfied by the related master servicer, manager or trustee or another specified party, as the case may be, to the extent that substantially comparable information is provided in accordance with any requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.

If one of our trusts includes mortgage-backed securities, the ability of the related master servicer, manager or trustee or another specified party, as the case may be, to include in any distribution date statement

111

information regarding the mortgage loans that back those securities will depend on comparable reports being received with respect to them.

Except as described in the related prospectus supplement, neither the master servicer nor any other party to a Governing Document will be required to provide certificateholders, or a trustee on their behalf, periodic evidence of the absence of a default under, or of compliance with the terms of, that Governing Document.

Voting Rights

Voting rights will be allocated among the respective classes of offered and non-offered certificates of each series in the manner described in the related prospectus supplement.  Certificateholders will generally not have a right to vote, except—

● with respect to certain amendments to the related Governing Document as described under “Description of the Governing Documents—Amendment,” or

● as otherwise specified in this prospectus or in the related prospectus supplement.

As and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, the certificateholders entitled to a  specified amount of the voting rights for a particular series will have the right to act as a group to remove or replace the related trustee, master servicer, special servicer or manager.  In general, that removal or replacement must be for cause.  We will identify exceptions in the related prospectus supplement.

Termination and Redemption

The trust for each series of offered certificates will terminate and cease to exist following:

● the final payment or other liquidation of the last mortgage asset in that trust; and

● the payment, or provision for payment (i) to the certificateholders of that series of all amounts required to be paid to them and (ii) to the respective parties to the Governing Document and the members, managers, officers, directors, employees and/or agents of each of them of all amounts which may have become due and owing to any of them under the Governing Document.

Written notice of termination of a trust will be given to each affected certificateholder.  The final payment will be made only upon presentation and surrender of the certificates of the related series at the location to be specified in the notice of termination.

If we so specify in the related prospectus supplement, one or more designated parties will be entitled to purchase all of the mortgage assets underlying a series of offered certificates, thereby effecting early retirement of the certificates and early termination of the related trust.  We will describe in the related prospectus supplement which parties may exercise that purchase option, the circumstances under which those parties may exercise that purchase option and the price or the formula for determining the price.

Further, if so specified in the related prospectus supplement, but subject to the conditions specified in that prospectus supplement, following the date on which the total principal balances of the offered certificates are reduced to zero, all or substantially all of the remaining certificateholders (which may exclude any holders of a class of certificates evidencing a residual interest in a REMIC or other specified class of non-offered certificates) of a given series of certificates, acting together, may exchange all of those certificates for all of the mortgage loans, REO properties and mortgage-backed securities remaining in the mortgage pool underlying those certificates, thereby effecting the early termination of the related trust.  Upon receipt by the related trustee of all

112

amounts due and owing in connection with such exchange, the trustee will transfer or cause to be transferred to a designee of all of the remaining certificateholders all of the remaining mortgage assets.

In addition, if we so specify in the related prospectus supplement, on a specified date or upon the reduction of the total principal balance of a specified class or classes of certificates by a specified percentage or amount, a party designated in the related prospectus supplement may be authorized or required to purchase, or to solicit bids for the purchase of, all the mortgage assets of the related trust or of a sufficient portion of the mortgage assets to retire that class or those classes of certificates.  The solicitation of bids must be conducted in a commercially reasonable manner, and assets will, in general, be sold at their fair market value.  If the price at which the mortgage assets are sold is less than their unpaid balance, plus accrued interest, then the holders of one or more classes of certificates may receive an amount less than the total principal balance of, and accrued and unpaid interest on, their certificates.

The title for any class of offered certificates with an optional redemption or termination feature that may be exercised when 25% or more of the original principal balance of the related mortgage asset pool – or, in the case of a master trust, of the particular series in which the class was issued – is still outstanding, will include the word “callable.”

Book-Entry Registration

General.  Any class of offered certificates may be issued in book-entry form through the facilities of DTC.  If so, that class will be represented by one or more global certificates registered in the name of DTC or its nominee.  If we so specify in the related prospectus supplement, we will arrange for clearance and settlement through the Euroclear System or Clearstream Banking, société anonyme, for so long as they are participants in DTC.

DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream.  DTC is:

● a limited-purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law,

● a “banking corporation” within the meaning of the New York Banking Law,

● a member of the Federal Reserve System,

● a “clearing corporation” within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code, and

● a “clearing agency” registered under the provisions of Section 17A of the Exchange Act.

DTC was created to hold securities for participants in the DTC system and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities transactions between those participants through electronic computerized book-entry changes in their accounts, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of securities certificates. Organizations  that maintain accounts with DTC include securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies and clearing corporations and may include other organizations.  DTC is owned by a number of its participating organizations and by the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., the American Stock Exchange, Inc. and the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.  Access to the DTC system is also available to others such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies that directly or indirectly clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with one of the organizations that maintains an account with DTC.  The rules applicable to DTC and its participating organizations are on file with the SEC.

It is our understanding that Clearstream holds securities for its member organizations and facilitates the clearance and settlement of securities transactions between its member organizations through electronic book-entry changes in accounts of those organizations, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of

113

certificates.  Transactions may be settled in Clearstream in a variety of currencies, including United States dollars.  Clearstream provides to its member organizations, among other things, services for safekeeping, administration, clearance and settlement of internationally traded securities and securities lending and borrowing.  Clearstream interfaces with domestic securities markets in numerous countries through established depository and custodial relationships.  Clearstream is registered as a bank in Luxembourg.  It is subject to regulation by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier, which supervises Luxembourg banks.  Clearstream’s customers are world-wide financial institutions including underwriters, securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies and clearing corporations.  Clearstream’s U.S. customers are limited to securities brokers and dealers, and banks.  Indirect access to Clearstream is available to other institutions that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with an account holder of Clearstream.  Clearstream and Euroclear have established an electronic bridge between their two systems across which their respective participants may settle trades with each other.

It is our understanding that Euroclear holds securities for its member organizations and facilitates the clearance and settlement of securities transactions between its member organizations through simultaneous electronic book-entry delivery against payment, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates and any risk from lack of simultaneous transfers of securities and cash.  Transactions may be settled in Euroclear in a variety of currencies, including United States dollars.  Euroclear provides various other services, including securities lending and borrowing and interfaces with domestic markets in several countries generally similar to the arrangements for cross-market transfers with DTC described below in this “—Book-Entry Registration” section.  Euroclear is operated by Euroclear Bank S.A./N.V., as Euroclear Operator, under a license agreement with Euroclear Clearance System Public Limited Company.  All operations are conducted by the Euroclear Operator, and all Euroclear securities clearance accounts and Euroclear cash accounts are accounts with the Euroclear Operator, not ECSPLC.  ECSPLC establishes policy for the Euroclear system on behalf of  member organizations of Euroclear.  Those member organizations include banks, including central banks, securities brokers and dealers and other professional financial intermediaries.  Indirect access to the Euroclear system is also available to other firms that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a member organization of Euroclear, either directly or indirectly.  Euroclear and Clearstream have established an electronic bridge between their two systems across which their respective participants may settle trades with each other.

Securities clearance accounts and cash accounts with the Euroclear Operator are governed by the Euroclear Terms and Conditions.  The Euroclear Terms and Conditions govern transfers of securities and cash within the Euroclear system, withdrawal of securities and cash from the Euroclear system, and receipts of payments with respect to securities in the Euroclear system.  All securities in the Euroclear system are held on a fungible basis without attribution of specific securities to specific securities clearance accounts.  The Euroclear Operator acts under the Euroclear Terms and Conditions only on behalf of member organizations of Euroclear and has no record of or relationship with persons holding through those member organizations.

The information in this prospectus concerning DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream, and their book-entry systems, has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not take any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of that information.

Holding and Transferring Book-Entry Certificates.  Purchases of book-entry certificates under the DTC system must be made by or through, and will be recorded on the records of, the Financial Intermediary that maintains the beneficial owner’s account for that purpose.  In turn, the Financial Intermediary’s ownership of those certificates will be recorded on the records of DTC or, alternatively, if the Financial Intermediary does not maintain an account with DTC, on the records of a participating firm that acts as agent for the Financial Intermediary, whose interest will in turn be recorded on the records of DTC.  A beneficial owner of book-entry certificates must rely on the foregoing procedures to evidence its beneficial ownership of those certificates.  DTC has no knowledge of the actual beneficial owners of the book-entry certificates.  DTC’s records reflect only the identity of the direct participants to whose accounts those certificates are credited, which may or may not be the actual beneficial owners.  The participants in the DTC system will remain responsible for keeping account of their holdings on behalf of their customers.

114

Transfers between participants in the DTC system will be effected in the ordinary manner in accordance with DTC’s rules and will be settled in same-day funds.  Transfers between direct account holders at Euroclear and Clearstream, or between persons or entities participating indirectly in Euroclear or Clearstream, will be effected in the ordinary manner in accordance with their respective procedures and in accordance with DTC’s rules.

Cross-market transfers between direct participants in DTC, on the one hand, and member organizations at Euroclear or Clearstream, on the other, will be effected through DTC in accordance with DTC’s rules and the rules of Euroclear or Clearstream, as applicable.  These cross-market transactions will require, among other things, delivery of instructions by the applicable member organization to Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, in accordance with the rules and procedures and within deadlines, Brussels time, established in Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be.  If the transaction complies with all relevant requirements, Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, will then deliver instructions to its depositary to take action to effect final settlement on its behalf.

Because of time-zone differences, the securities account of a member organization of Euroclear or Clearstream purchasing an interest in a global certificate from a DTC participant that is not a member organization, will be credited during the securities settlement processing day, which must be a business day for Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, immediately following the DTC settlement date.  Transactions in interests in a book-entry certificate settled during any securities settlement processing day will be reported to the relevant member organization of Euroclear or Clearstream on the same day.  Cash received in Euroclear or Clearstream as a result of sales of interests in a book-entry certificate by or through a member organization of Euroclear or Clearstream, as the case may be, to a DTC participant that is not a member organization will be received with value on the DTC settlement date, but will not be available in the relevant Euroclear or Clearstream cash account until the business day following settlement in DTC.  The related prospectus supplement will contain additional information regarding clearance and settlement procedures for the book-entry certificates and with respect to tax documentation procedures relating to the book-entry certificates.

Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to DTC participants, and by DTC participants to Financial Intermediaries and beneficial owners, will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time.

Payments on the book-entry certificates will be made to DTC.  DTC’s practice is to credit DTC participants’ accounts on the related distribution date in accordance with their respective holdings shown on DTC’s records, unless DTC has reason to believe that it will not receive payment on that date.  Disbursement of those payments by DTC participants to Financial Intermediaries and beneficial owners will be—

● governed by standing instructions and customary practices, as is the case with securities held for the accounts of customers in bearer form or registered in street name, and

● the sole responsibility of each of those DTC participants, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements in effect from time to time.

Under a book-entry system, beneficial owners may receive payments after the related distribution date.

The only “certificateholder” of book-entry certificates will be DTC or its nominee.  Parties to the governing documents for any series of offered certificates need not recognize beneficial owners of book-entry certificates as “certificateholders.”  The beneficial owners of book-entry certificates will be permitted to exercise the rights of “certificateholders” only indirectly through the DTC participants, who in turn will exercise their rights through DTC.  We have been informed that DTC will take action permitted to be taken by a “certificateholder” only at the direction of one or more DTC participants.  DTC may take conflicting actions with

115

respect to the book-entry certificates to the extent that those actions are taken on behalf of Financial Intermediaries whose holdings include those certificates.

Because DTC can act only on behalf of DTC participants, who in turn act on behalf of Financial Intermediaries and beneficial owners of the applicable book-entry securities, the ability of a beneficial owner to pledge its interest in a class of book-entry certificates to persons or entities that do not participate in the DTC system, or otherwise to take actions with respect to its interest in a class of book-entry certificates, may be limited due to the lack of a physical certificate evidencing that interest.

Issuance of Definitive Certificates.  Unless we specify otherwise in the related prospectus supplement, beneficial owners of affected offered certificates initially issued in book-entry form will not be able to obtain physical certificates that represent those offered certificates, unless:

● we advise the related trustee or other related certificate registrar in writing that DTC is no longer willing or able to discharge properly its responsibilities as depository with respect to those offered certificates and we are unable to locate a qualified successor; or

● we notify DTC of our intent to terminate the book-entry system through DTC with respect to those offered certificates and, in the event applicable law and/or DTC’s procedures require that the DTC participants holding beneficial interests in those offered certificates submit a withdrawal request to DTC in order to so terminate the book-entry system, we additionally notify those DTC participants and they submit a withdrawal request with respect to such termination.

Upon the occurrence of either of the two events described in the prior paragraph, the trustee or other designated party will be required to notify all DTC participants, through DTC, of the availability of physical certificates with respect to the affected offered certificates.  Upon surrender by DTC of the certificate or certificates representing a class of book-entry offered certificates, together with instructions for registration, the related trustee or other designated party will be required to issue to the beneficial owners identified in those instructions physical certificates representing those offered certificates.

Exchangeable Certificates

General. If specified in the related prospectus supplement, a series of certificates may include one or more classes of certificates that are “exchangeable certificates.”  In any of these series, the holders of one or more of the classes of exchangeable certificates will be entitled, after notice and payment to the trustee, the paying agent or another person performing similar functions of an administrative fee, to exchange all or a portion of their exchangeable certificates for proportionate interests in one or more specified classes of related exchangeable certificates.  Similarly, in any of these series, the holders of one or more classes of exchangeable certificates will be entitled, after notice and payment to the trustee, the paying agent or another person performing similar functions of an administrative fee, to exchange all or a portion of their exchangeable certificates for proportionate interests in one or more specified other classes of exchangeable certificates or for proportionate interests in the related exchangeable certificates that were originally exchanged.

If a series includes classes of exchangeable certificates, all of those classes of exchangeable certificates will be listed and described in the related prospectus supplement.  The classes of exchangeable certificates that are exchangeable for one another will be referred to in the related prospectus supplement as “related” to each other, and each related grouping of exchangeable certificates that may be exchanged together will be referred to as a “combination.”  The class or classes of certificates that are “exchangeable certificates” will be identified as such in the related prospectus supplement.  Each exchangeable certificate that is received in an exchange will represent both (i) the right to receive some or all of the cashflow otherwise payable to the related combination of exchangeable certificates surrendered in such exchange, and (ii) the right to exercise all rights of the class or classes of related combination of exchangeable certificates surrendered in such exchange.  At any time after their

116

initial issuance, the class or classes of exchangeable certificates may be exchanged for a proportionate interest in the related class or classes of other exchangeable certificates.  In some cases, as and to the extent specified in the related prospectus supplement, multiple classes of exchangeable certificates may be exchanged for one or more classes of related exchangeable certificates.  Exchangeable certificates received in an exchange or obtained in the initial issuance may subsequently be exchanged for proportionate interests in other exchangeable certificates as set forth in the related prospectus supplement.  This process may be repeated from time to time.

The descriptions in the related prospectus supplement of the certificates of a series that apply to exchangeable certificates, including descriptions of principal and interest distributions, registration and denomination of certificates, credit enhancement, yield and prepayment considerations and tax, ERISA and legal investment considerations, will also apply to each related class of exchangeable certificates.  The related prospectus supplement will separately describe the yield and prepayment considerations applicable to, and the risks of investment in, each class of exchangeable certificates.  For example, separate decrement tables and yield tables, if applicable, will be included for each class of exchangeable certificates.

Exchanges. If a holder elects to exchange its exchangeable certificates for other related exchangeable certificates, the following three conditions must be satisfied:

● the aggregate principal balance of the exchangeable certificates received in the exchange, immediately after the exchange, must equal the aggregate principal balance, immediately prior to the exchange, of the related exchangeable certificates surrendered in such exchange (for purposes of this condition, an interest-only class will have a principal balance of zero);

● the aggregate amount of interest payable on any distribution date with respect to the exchangeable certificates received in the exchange must equal the aggregate amount of interest payable on such distribution date with respect to the related exchangeable certificates surrendered in such exchange; and

● the class or classes of exchangeable certificates must be exchanged in the proportions, if any, described in the related prospectus supplement.

There are different types of combinations of exchangeable certificates that can exist.  Any individual series of certificates may have multiple types of combinations.  Some examples of combinations of exchangeable certificates that differ in their interest characteristics include:

● A class of exchangeable certificates with a floating interest rate and a class of exchangeable certificates with an inverse floating interest rate may be exchangeable, together, for a class of exchangeable certificates with a fixed interest rate.  In this case, the classes of surrendered exchangeable certificates with interest rates that vary with an index would produce, in the aggregate, an annual interest amount equal to that generated by the exchangeable class received in the exchange with a fixed interest rate.  In addition, the aggregate principal balance of the two surrendered exchangeable classes with interest rates that vary with an index would equal the principal balance of the exchangeable class received in the exchange with the fixed interest rate.

● An interest-only class and a principal-only class of exchangeable certificates may be exchangeable, together, for a class of exchangeable certificates that is entitled to both principal and interest payments.  The principal balance of the principal and interest class of exchangeable certificates received in the exchange would be equal to the principal balance of the surrendered exchangeable principal-only class, and the interest rate on the exchangeable principal and interest class received in the exchange would be a fixed rate that, when applied to the principal balance of this class, would generate an annual interest amount equal to the annual interest

117

amount of the surrendered exchangeable interest-only class in distributions that have identical amounts and identical timing.

● Two or more classes of exchangeable principal and interest classes with different fixed interest rates may be exchangeable, together, for an exchangeable class that is entitled to both principal and interest payments, with a principal balance equal to the aggregate principal balance of the two or more classes of exchangeable certificates that are surrendered in the exchange, and a fixed interest rate that, when applied to the principal balance of the exchangeable class, would generate an annual interest amount equal to the aggregate amount of annual interest payable with respect to the two or more classes of exchangeable certificates that are surrendered in the exchange.

In some series of offered certificates, a holder may be able to exchange exchangeable certificates for related exchangeable certificates that have different principal payment characteristics.  Examples of these types of combinations include:

● A class of exchangeable certificates that accretes all of its interest for a specified period, with the accreted amount added to the principal balance of the accreting class, and a class of exchangeable certificates that receives principal payments from these accretions may be exchangeable, together, for a single class of related exchangeable certificates that receives payments of interest continuously from the first distribution date on which it receives interest until it is retired.

● A class of exchangeable certificates that is a planned principal class or targeted principal class, and a class of exchangeable certificates that only receives principal payments on a distribution date if scheduled payments have been made on the planned principal class or targeted principal class, as applicable, may be exchangeable, together, for a class of related exchangeable certificates that receives principal payments without regard to the schedule from the first distribution date on which it receives principal until it is retired.

These combinations are only examples.  Additional combinations are possible and the related prospectus supplement will describe all of the exchangeable certificates for that series.

Procedures. The related prospectus supplement will describe the procedures that must be followed to make an exchange.  A holder will be required to provide notice to the trustee, the certificate registrar or another person performing similar functions in advance of the proposed exchange date.  The notice must include the outstanding principal or notional amount of the certificates to be exchanged and to be received, and the proposed exchange date.  When the trustee, the certificate registrar or another person performing similar functions receives this notice, it will provide instructions to the holder regarding delivery of the certificates and payment of the administrative fee.  A holder’s notice to the trustee, the certificate registrar or another person performing similar functions will become irrevocable on the second business day prior to the proposed exchange date.  Any exchangeable certificates in book-entry form will be subject to the rules, regulations and procedures applicable to DTC’s book-entry certificates.

If the related prospectus supplement describes exchange proportions for a combination of classes of exchangeable certificates, these proportions will be based on the original, rather than the outstanding, principal or notional amounts of these classes.

The first payment on an exchangeable certificate received in an exchange will be made on the distribution date in the month following the month of the exchange or as otherwise described in the related prospectus supplement.  This payment will be made to the holder of record as of the applicable record date.

118

YIELD AND MATURITY CONSIDERATIONS

General

The yield on your offered certificates will depend on—

● the price you paid for your offered certificates,

● the pass-through rate on your offered certificates, and

● the amount and timing of payments on your offered certificates.

The following discussion contemplates a trust established by us that consists only of mortgage loans.  If one of our trusts also includes a mortgage-backed security, the payment terms of that security will soften or enhance the effects that the characteristics and behavior of mortgage loans backing that security can have on the yield to maturity and/or weighted average life of a class of offered certificates. If one of our trusts includes a mortgage-backed security, we will discuss in the related prospectus supplement the effect, if any, that the security may have on the yield to maturity and weighted average lives of the related offered certificates.

Pass-Through Rate

A class of interest-bearing offered certificates may have a fixed, variable or adjustable pass-through rate.  We will specify in the related prospectus supplement the pass-through rate for each class of interest-bearing offered certificates or, if the pass-through rate is variable or adjustable, the method of determining the pass-through rate.

Payment Delays

There will be a delay between the date on which payments on the underlying mortgage loans are due and the date on which those payments are passed through to you and other investors.  That delay will reduce the yield that would otherwise be produced if those payments were passed through on your offered certificates on the same date that they were due.

Yield and Prepayment Considerations

The yield to maturity on your offered certificates will be affected by the rate of principal payments on the underlying mortgage loans and the allocation of those principal payments to reduce the principal balance or notional amount of your offered certificates.  The rate of principal payments on those mortgage loans will be affected by the following:

● the amortization schedules of the mortgage loans, which may change from time to time to reflect, among other things, changes in mortgage interest rates or partial prepayments of principal;

● the dates on which any balloon payments are due; and

● the rate of principal prepayments on the mortgage loans, including voluntary prepayments by borrowers and involuntary prepayments resulting from liquidations, casualties or purchases of mortgage loans.

Because the rate of principal prepayments on the mortgage loans underlying your offered certificates will depend on future events and a variety of factors, we cannot give you any assurance as to that rate.

119

The extent to which the yield to maturity of your offered certificates may vary from your anticipated yield will depend upon—

● whether you purchased your offered certificates at a discount or premium and, if so, the extent of that discount or premium, and

● when, and to what degree, payments of principal on the underlying mortgage loans are applied or otherwise result in the reduction of the principal balance or notional amount of your offered certificates.

If you purchase your offered certificates at a discount, then you should consider the risk that a slower than anticipated rate of principal payments on the underlying mortgage loans could result in an actual yield to you that is lower than your anticipated yield.  If you purchase your offered certificates at a premium, then you should consider the risk that a faster than anticipated rate of principal payments on the underlying mortgage loans could result in an actual yield to you that is lower than your anticipated yield.

If your offered certificates entitle you to payments of interest, with disproportionate, nominal or no payments of principal, then you should consider that your yield will be extremely sensitive to prepayments on the underlying mortgage loans and, under some prepayment scenarios, may be negative.

If a class of offered certificates accrues interest on a notional amount, that notional amount will, in general, either—

● be based on the principal balances of some or all of the mortgage assets in the related trust, or

● equal the total principal balance, or a designated portion of the total principal balance, of one or more of the other classes of certificates of the same series.

Accordingly, the yield on that class of certificates will be inversely related to, as applicable, the rate at which—

● payments and other collections of principal are received on the mortgage assets referred to in the first bullet point of the prior sentence, and/or

● payments are made in reduction of the total principal balance, or a designated portion of the total principal balance, of any class of certificates referred to in the second bullet point of the prior sentence.

The extent of prepayments of principal of the mortgage loans underlying your offered certificates may be affected by a number of factors, including:

● the availability of mortgage credit;

● the relative economic vitality of the area in which the related real properties are located;

● the quality of management of the related real properties;

● the servicing of the mortgage loans;

● possible changes in tax laws; and

● other opportunities for investment.

120

In general, those factors that increase—

● the attractiveness of selling or refinancing a commercial or multifamily property, or

● the likelihood of default under a commercial or multifamily mortgage loan,

would be expected to cause the rate of prepayment to accelerate.  In contrast, those factors having an opposite effect would be expected to cause the rate of prepayment to slow.

The rate of principal payments on the mortgage loans underlying your offered certificates may also be affected by the existence and enforceability of prepayment restrictions, such as—

● prepayment lock-out periods, and

● requirements that voluntary principal prepayments be accompanied by prepayment premiums, fees or charges.

If enforceable, those provisions could constitute either an absolute prohibition, in the case of a prepayment lock-out period, or a disincentive, in the case of a prepayment premium, fee or charge, to a borrower’s voluntarily prepaying its mortgage loan, thereby slowing the rate of prepayments.

The rate of prepayment on a pool of mortgage loans is likely to be affected by prevailing market interest rates for mortgage loans of a comparable type, term and risk level.  As prevailing market interest rates decline, a borrower may have an increased incentive to refinance its mortgage loan.  Even in the case of adjustable rate mortgage loans, as prevailing market interest rates decline, the related borrowers may have an increased incentive to refinance for the following purposes:

● to convert to a fixed rate loan and thereby lock in that rate, or

● to take advantage of a different index, margin or rate cap or floor on another adjustable rate mortgage loan.

Subject to prevailing market interest rates and economic conditions generally, a borrower may sell a real property in order to—

● realize its equity in the property,

● meet cash flow needs or

● make other investments.

Additionally, some borrowers may be motivated by federal and state tax laws, which are subject to change, to sell their properties prior to the exhaustion of tax depreciation benefits.

We make no representation as to—

● the particular factors that will affect the prepayment of the mortgage loans underlying any series of offered certificates,

● the relative importance of those factors,

● the percentage of the principal balance of those mortgage loans that will be paid as of any date, or

121

● the overall rate of prepayment on those mortgage loans.

Weighted Average Life and Maturity

The rate at which principal payments are received on the mortgage loans underlying any series of offered certificates will affect the ultimate maturity and the weighted average life of one or more classes of those certificates.  In general, weighted average life refers to the average amount of time that will elapse from the date of issuance of an instrument until each dollar allocable as principal of that instrument is repaid to the investor.

The weighted average life and maturity of a class of offered certificates will be influenced by the rate at which principal on the underlying mortgage loans is paid to that class, whether in the form of—

● scheduled amortization, or

● prepayments, including—

1. voluntary prepayments by borrowers, and

2. involuntary prepayments resulting from liquidations, casualties or condemnations and purchases of mortgage loans out of the related trust.

In the prospectus supplement for a series of offered certificates, we will include tables, if applicable, setting forth—

● the projected weighted average life of each class of those offered certificates with principal balances, and

● the percentage of the initial total principal balance of each class of those offered certificates that would be outstanding on specified dates,

based on the assumptions stated in that prospectus supplement, including assumptions regarding prepayments on the underlying mortgage loans.  Those tables and assumptions illustrate the sensitivity of the weighted average lives of those offered certificates to various assumed prepayment rates and are not intended to predict, or to provide information that will enable you to predict, the actual weighted average lives of your offered certificates.

Prepayment Models

Prepayment rates on loans are commonly measured relative to a prepayment standard or model, such as the CPR prepayment model or the SPA prepayment model.  CPR represents an assumed constant rate of prepayment each month, expressed as an annual percentage, relative to the then outstanding principal balance of a pool of mortgage loans for the life of those loans.  SPA represents an assumed variable rate of prepayment each month, expressed as an annual percentage, relative to the then outstanding principal balance of a pool of mortgage loans, with different prepayment assumptions often expressed as percentages of SPA.  For example, a prepayment assumption of 100% of SPA assumes prepayment rates of 0.2% per annum of the then outstanding principal balance of those loans in the first month of the life of the loans and an additional 0.2% per annum in each month thereafter until the 30th month.  Beginning in the 30th month, and in each month thereafter during the life of the loans, 100% of SPA assumes a constant prepayment rate of 6% per annum each month.

Neither CPR nor SPA nor any other prepayment model or assumption is a historical description of prepayment experience or a prediction of the anticipated rate of prepayment of any particular pool of mortgage loans.  Moreover, the CPR and SPA models were developed based upon historical prepayment experience for

122

single-family mortgage loans.  It is unlikely that the prepayment experience of the mortgage loans underlying your offered certificates will conform to any particular level of CPR or SPA.

Other Factors Affecting Yield, Weighted Average Life and Maturity

Balloon Payments; Extensions of Maturity.  Some or all of the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may require that balloon payments be made at maturity.  The ability of a borrower to make a balloon payment typically will depend upon its ability either—

● to refinance the loan, or

● to sell the related real property.

If a borrower is unable to refinance or sell the related real property, there is a possibility that the borrower may default on the mortgage loan or that the maturity of the mortgage loan may be extended in connection with a workout.  If a borrower defaults, recovery of proceeds may be delayed by—

● the bankruptcy of the borrower, or

● adverse economic conditions in the market where the related real property is located.

In order to minimize losses on defaulted mortgage loans, the related master servicer or special servicer may be authorized within prescribed limits to modify mortgage loans that are in default or as to which a payment default is reasonably foreseeable.  Any defaulted balloon payment or modification that extends the maturity of a mortgage loan may delay payments of principal on your offered certificates and extend the weighted average life of your offered certificates.

Negative Amortization.  The weighted average life of a class of offered certificates can be affected by mortgage loans that permit negative amortization to occur.  Those are the mortgage loans that provide for the current payment of interest calculated at a rate lower than the rate at which interest accrues on the mortgage loan, with the unpaid portion of that interest being added to the related principal balance.  Negative amortization most commonly occurs with respect to an adjustable rate mortgage loan that:

● limits the amount by which its scheduled payment may adjust in response to a change in its mortgage interest rate;

● provides that its scheduled payment will adjust less frequently than its mortgage interest rate; or

● provides for constant scheduled payments regardless of adjustments to its mortgage interest rate.

Negative amortization on one or more mortgage loans in any of our trusts may result in negative amortization on a related class of offered certificates.  We will describe in the related prospectus supplement, if applicable, the manner in which negative amortization with respect to the underlying mortgage loans is allocated among the respective classes of a series of offered certificates.

The portion of any mortgage loan negative amortization allocated to a class of offered certificates may result in a deferral of some or all of the interest payable on those certificates.  Deferred interest may be added to the total principal balance of a class of offered certificates.  In addition, an adjustable rate mortgage loan that permits negative amortization would be expected during a period of increasing interest rates to amortize, if at all, at a slower rate than if interest rates were declining or were remaining constant.  This slower rate of mortgage loan amortization would be reflected in a slower rate of amortization for one or more classes of certificates of the related series.  Accordingly, there may be an increase in the weighted average lives of those classes of certificates

123

to which any mortgage loan negative amortization would be allocated or that would bear the effects of a slower rate of amortization of the underlying mortgage loans.

The extent to which the yield on your offered certificates may be affected by any negative amortization on the underlying mortgage loans will depend, in part, upon whether you purchase your offered certificates at a premium or a discount.

During a period of declining interest rates, the scheduled payment on an adjustable rate mortgage loan may exceed the amount necessary to amortize the loan fully over its remaining amortization schedule and pay interest at the then applicable mortgage interest rate.  The result is the accelerated amortization of the mortgage loan.  The acceleration in amortization of a mortgage loan will shorten the weighted average lives of those classes of certificates that entitle their holders to a portion of the principal payments on the mortgage loan.

Foreclosures and Payment Plans.  The weighted average life of and yield on your offered certificates will be affected by—

● the number of foreclosures with respect to the underlying mortgage loans; and

● the principal amount of the foreclosed mortgage loans in relation to the principal amount of those mortgage loans that are repaid in accordance with their terms.

Servicing decisions made with respect to the underlying mortgage loans, including the use of payment plans prior to a demand for acceleration and the restructuring of mortgage loans in bankruptcy proceedings or otherwise, may also affect the payment patterns of particular mortgage loans and, as a result, the weighted average life of and yield on your offered certificates.

Losses and Shortfalls on the Mortgage Assets.  The yield on your offered certificates will directly depend on the extent to which you are required to bear the effects of any losses or shortfalls in collections on the underlying mortgage loans and the timing of those losses and shortfalls.  In general, the earlier that you bear any loss or shortfall, the greater will be the negative effect on the yield of your offered certificates.

The amount of any losses or shortfalls in collections on the mortgage assets in any of our trusts will, to the extent not covered or offset by draws on any reserve fund or under any instrument of credit support, be allocated among the various classes of certificates of the related series in the priority and manner, and subject to the limitations, that we specify in the related prospectus supplement.  As described in the related prospectus supplement, those allocations may be effected by the following:

● a reduction in the entitlements to interest and/or the total principal balances of one or more classes of certificates; and/or

● the establishment of a priority of payments among classes of certificates.

If you purchase subordinated certificates, the yield to maturity on those certificates may be extremely sensitive to losses and shortfalls in collections on the underlying mortgage loans.

Additional Certificate Amortization.  If your offered certificates have a principal balance, then they entitle you to a specified portion of the principal payments received on the underlying mortgage loans.  They may also entitle you to payments of principal from the following sources:

● amounts attributable to interest accrued but not currently payable on one or more other  classes of certificates of the applicable series;

124

● interest received or advanced on the underlying mortgage assets that is in excess of the interest currently accrued on the certificates of the applicable series;

● prepayment premiums, fees and charges, payments from equity participations or any other amounts received on the underlying mortgage assets that do not constitute interest or principal; or

● any other amounts described in the related prospectus supplement.

The amortization of your offered certificates out of the sources described in the prior paragraph would shorten their weighted average life and, if your offered certificates were purchased at a premium, reduce their yield to maturity.

DESCRIPTION OF CREDIT SUPPORT

General

Credit support may be provided with respect to one or more classes of the offered certificates of any series or with respect to the related mortgage assets.  That credit support may be in the form of any of the following:

● overcollateralization and/or excess cash flow;

● the subordination of one or more other classes of certificates of the same series;

● the use of a letter of credit, a surety bond, an insurance policy or a guarantee;

● the establishment of one or more reserve funds; or

● any combination of the foregoing.

If and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, any of the above forms of credit support may provide credit enhancement for non-offered certificates, as well as offered certificates, or for more than one series of certificates.

If you are the beneficiary of any particular form of credit support, that credit support may not protect you against all risks of loss and will not guarantee payment to you of all amounts to which you are entitled under your offered certificates.  If losses or shortfalls occur that exceed the amount covered by that credit support or that are of a type not covered by that credit support, you will bear your allocable share of deficiencies.  Moreover, if that credit support covers the offered certificates of more than one class or series and total losses on the related mortgage assets exceed the amount of that credit support, it is possible that the holders of offered certificates of other classes and/or series will be disproportionately benefited by that credit support to your detriment.

If you are the beneficiary of any particular form of credit support, we will include in the related prospectus supplement a description of the following:

● the nature and amount of coverage under that credit support;

● any conditions to payment not otherwise described in this prospectus;

● any conditions under which the amount of coverage under that credit support may be reduced and under which that credit support may be terminated or replaced; and

125

● the material provisions relating to that credit support.

Additionally, we will set forth in the related prospectus supplement information with respect to the obligor, if any, under any instrument of credit support.

Subordinate Certificates

If and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, one or more classes of certificates of any series may be subordinate to one or more other classes of certificates of that series.  If you purchase subordinate certificates, your right to receive payments out of collections and advances on the related trust assets on any distribution date will be subordinated to the corresponding rights of the holders of the more senior classes of certificates.  If and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, the subordination of a class of certificates may not cover all types of losses or shortfalls.  In the related prospectus supplement, we will set forth information concerning the method and amount of subordination provided by a class or classes of subordinate certificates in a series and the circumstances under which that subordination will be available.

If the mortgage assets in any trust established by us are divided into separate groups, each supporting a separate class or classes of certificates of the related series, credit support may be provided by cross-support provisions requiring that payments be made on senior certificates evidencing interests in one group of those mortgage assets prior to payments on subordinate certificates evidencing interests in a different group of those mortgage assets.  We will describe in the related prospectus supplement the manner and conditions for applying any cross-support provisions.

Overcollateralization and Excess Cash Flow

If and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, the mortgage assets underlying any series of offered certificates may generate cashflows for the benefit of the related trust that, in the absence of default, will be in excess of the amount needed to make all required payments with respect to the offered and non-offered certificates of that series.  This may be as a result of excess spread or because the mortgage assets have a greater total principal balance than the total principal balance of the certificates of the subject series.  As and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, the additional cashflow may be available to cover losses or other shortfalls on one or more classes of related offered certificates and/or to amortize one or more classes of related offered certificates.

Letters of Credit

If and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, deficiencies in amounts otherwise payable on a series of offered certificates or select classes of those certificates will be covered by one or more letters of credit, issued by a bank or other financial institution specified in the related prospectus supplement.  The issuer of a letter of credit will be obligated to honor draws under that letter of credit in a total fixed dollar amount, net of unreimbursed payments under the letter of credit, generally equal to a percentage specified in the related prospectus supplement of the total principal balance of some or all of the related mortgage assets as of the date the related trust was formed or of the initial total principal balance of one or more classes of certificates of the applicable series.  The letter of credit may permit draws only in the event of select types of losses and shortfalls.  The amount available under the letter of credit will, in all cases, be reduced to the extent of the unreimbursed payments thereunder and may otherwise be reduced as described in the related prospectus supplement.  The obligations of the letter of credit issuer under the letter of credit for any series of offered certificates will expire at the earlier of the date specified in the related prospectus supplement or the termination of the related trust.

126

Insurance Policies, Surety Bonds and Guarantees

If and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, deficiencies in amounts otherwise payable on a series of offered certificates or select classes of those certificates will be covered by insurance policies, surety bonds or guarantees provided by one or more insurance companies, sureties or other credit support providers.  These instruments may cover, with respect to one or more classes of the offered certificates of the related series, timely payments of interest and principal or timely payments of interest and payments of principal on the basis of a schedule of principal payments set forth in or determined in the manner specified in the related prospectus supplement.  We will describe in the related prospectus supplement any limitations on the draws that may be made under any of those instruments.

Alternatively, the mortgage assets, or one or more particular mortgage assets, included in any trust established by us may be covered for some default and/or loss risks by insurance policies, surety bonds or guarantees.  If so, we will describe in the related prospectus supplement the nature of those default and/or loss risks and the extent of that coverage.

Reserve Funds

If and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, deficiencies in amounts otherwise payable on a series of offered certificates or select classes of those certificates will be covered, to the extent of available funds, by one or more reserve funds in which cash, a letter of credit, permitted investments, a demand note or a combination of the foregoing, will be deposited, in the amounts specified in the related  prospectus supplement.  If and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, the reserve fund for the related series of offered certificates may also be funded over time.

Amounts on deposit in any reserve fund for a series of offered certificates will be applied for the purposes, in the manner, and to the extent specified in the related prospectus supplement.  If and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, reserve funds may be established to provide protection only against select types of losses and shortfalls.  Following each distribution date for the related series of offered certificates, amounts in a reserve fund in excess of any required balance may be released from the reserve fund under the conditions and to the extent specified in the related prospectus supplement.

Credit Support with Respect to MBS

If and to the extent described in the related prospectus supplement, any mortgage-backed security included in one of our trusts and/or the mortgage loans that back that security may be covered by one or more of the types of credit support described in this prospectus.  We will specify in the related prospectus supplement, as to each of those forms of credit support, the information indicated above with respect to that mortgage-backed security, to the extent that the information is material and available.

CERTAIN LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE MORTGAGE LOANS

Most, if not all, of the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates will be secured by multifamily and commercial properties in the United States, its territories and possessions.  However, some of those mortgage loans may be secured by multifamily and commercial properties outside the United States, its territories and possessions.

The following discussion contains general summaries of select legal aspects of mortgage loans secured by multifamily and commercial properties in the United States.  Because these legal aspects are governed by applicable state law, which may differ substantially from state to state, the summaries do not purport to be complete, to reflect the laws of any particular state, or to encompass the laws of all jurisdictions in which the security for the mortgage loans underlying the offered certificates is situated.  Accordingly, you should be aware

127

that the summaries are qualified in their entirety by reference to the applicable laws of those states.  See “The Trust Fund—Mortgage Loans.”

If a significant percentage of mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates, are secured by properties in a particular state, we will discuss the relevant state laws, to the extent they vary materially from this discussion, in the related prospectus supplement.

General

Each mortgage loan underlying a series of offered certificates will be evidenced by a note or bond and secured by an instrument granting a security interest in real property.  The instrument granting a security interest in real property may be a mortgage, deed of trust or a deed to secure debt, depending upon the prevailing practice and law in the state in which that real property is located.  Mortgages, deeds of trust and deeds to secure debt are often collectively referred to in this prospectus as “mortgages.”  A mortgage creates a lien upon, or grants a title interest in, the real property covered by the mortgage, and represents the security for the repayment of the indebtedness customarily evidenced by a promissory note.  The priority of the lien created or interest granted will depend on—

● the terms of the mortgage,

● the terms of separate subordination agreements or intercreditor agreements with others that hold interests in the real property,

● the knowledge of the parties to the mortgage, and

● in general, the order of recordation of the mortgage in the appropriate public recording office.

However, the lien of a recorded mortgage will generally be subordinate to later-arising liens for real estate taxes and assessments and other charges imposed under governmental police powers.

Types of Mortgage Instruments

There are two parties to a mortgage—

● a mortgagor, who is the owner of the encumbered interest in the real property, and

● a mortgagee, who is the lender.

In general, the mortgagor is also the borrower.

In contrast, a deed of trust is a three-party instrument.  The parties to a deed of trust are—

● the trustor, who is the equivalent of a mortgagor,

● the trustee to whom the real property is conveyed, and

● the beneficiary for whose benefit the conveyance is made, who is the lender.

Under a deed of trust, the trustor grants the property, irrevocably until the debt is paid, in trust and generally with a power of sale, to the trustee to secure repayment of the indebtedness evidenced by the related note.

128

A deed to secure debt typically has two parties.  Under a deed to secure debt, the grantor, who is the equivalent of a mortgagor, conveys title to the real property to the grantee, who is the lender, generally with a power of sale, until the debt is repaid.

Where the borrower is a land trust, there would be an additional party because legal title to the property is held by a land trustee under a land trust agreement for the benefit of the borrower.  At origination of a mortgage loan involving a land trust, the borrower may execute a separate undertaking to make payments on the mortgage note.  In no event is the land trustee personally liable for the mortgage note obligation.

The mortgagee’s authority under a mortgage, the trustee’s authority under a deed of trust and the grantee’s authority under a deed to secure debt are governed by:

● the express provisions of the related instrument,

● the law of the state in which the real property is located,

● various federal laws, and

● in some deed of trust transactions, the directions of the beneficiary.

Installment Contracts

The mortgage loans underlying your offered certificates may consist of installment contracts.  Under an installment contract the seller retains legal title to the property and enters into an agreement with the purchaser for payment of the purchase price, plus interest, over the term of the installment contract.  Only after full performance by the borrower of the contract is the seller obligated to convey title to the real estate to the purchaser.  During the period that the installment contract is in effect, the purchaser is generally responsible for maintaining the property in good condition and for paying real estate taxes, assessments and hazard insurance premiums associated with the property.

The seller’s enforcement of an installment contract varies from state to state.  Generally, installment contracts provide that upon a default by the purchaser, the purchaser loses his or her right to occupy the property, the entire indebtedness is accelerated, and the purchaser’s equitable interest in the property is forfeited.  The seller in this situation does not have to foreclose in order to obtain title to the property, although in some cases a quiet title action is in order if the purchaser has filed the installment contract in local land records and an ejectment action may be necessary to recover possession.  In a few states, particularly in cases of purchaser default during the early years of an installment contract, the courts will permit ejectment of the purchaser and a forfeiture of his or her interest in the property.

However, most state legislatures have enacted provisions by analogy to mortgage law protecting borrowers under installment contracts from the harsh consequences of forfeiture.  Under those statutes, a judicial or nonjudicial foreclosure may be required, the seller may be required to give notice of default and the borrower may be granted some grace period during which the contract may be reinstated upon full payment of the default amount and the purchaser may have a post-foreclosure statutory redemption right.  In other states, courts in equity may permit a purchaser with significant investment in the property under an installment contract for the sale of real estate to share in the proceeds of sale of the property after the indebtedness is repaid or may otherwise refuse to enforce the forfeiture clause.  Nevertheless, generally speaking, the seller’s procedures for obtaining possession and clear title under an installment contract for the sale of real estate in a given state are simpler and less time-consuming and costly than are the procedures for foreclosing and obtaining clear title to a mortgaged property.

129

Leases and Rents

A mortgage that encumbers an income-producing property often contains an assignment of rents and leases and/or may be accompanied by a separate assignment of rents and leases.  Under an assignment of rents and leases, the borrower assigns to the lender the borrower’s right, title and interest as landlord under each lease and the income derived from each lease.  However, the borrower retains a revocable license to collect the rents, provided there is no default and the rents are not directly paid to the lender.

If the borrower defaults, the license terminates and the lender is entitled to collect the rents.  Local law may require that the lender take possession of the property and/or obtain a court-appointed receiver before becoming entitled to collect the rents.

In most states, hotel and motel room rates are considered accounts receivable under the UCC.  Room rates are generally pledged by the borrower as additional security for the loan when a mortgage loan is secured by a hotel or motel.  In general, the lender must file financing statements in order to perfect its security interest in the room rates and must file continuation statements, generally every five years, to maintain that perfection.  Mortgage loans secured by hotels or motels may be included in one of our trusts even if the security interest in the room rates was not perfected or the requisite UCC filings were allowed to lapse.  A lender will generally be required to commence a foreclosure action or otherwise take possession of the property in order to enforce its rights to collect the room rates following a default, even if the lender’s security interest in room rates is perfected under applicable nonbankruptcy law.

In the bankruptcy setting, the lender will be stayed from enforcing its rights to collect hotel and motel room rates.  However, the room rates will constitute cash collateral and cannot be used by the bankrupt borrower—

● without a hearing or the lender’s consent, or

● unless the lender’s interest in the room rates is given adequate protection.

For purposes of the foregoing, the adequate protection may include a cash payment for otherwise encumbered funds or a replacement lien on unencumbered property, in either case equal in value to the amount of room rates that the bankrupt borrower proposes to use.  See “—Bankruptcy Laws” below.

Personalty

Some types of income-producing real properties, such as hotels, motels and nursing homes, may include personal property, which may, to the extent it is owned by the borrower and not previously pledged, constitute a significant portion of the property’s value as security.  The creation and enforcement of liens on personal property are governed by the UCC.  Accordingly, if a borrower pledges personal property as security for a mortgage loan, the lender generally must file UCC financing statements in order to perfect its security interest in the personal property and must file continuation statements, generally every five years, to maintain that perfection.  Mortgage loans secured in part by personal property may be included in one of our trusts even if the security interest in the personal property was not perfected or the requisite UCC filings were allowed to lapse.

Foreclosure

General.  Foreclosure is a legal procedure that allows the lender to recover its mortgage debt by enforcing its rights and available legal remedies under the mortgage.  If the borrower defaults in payment or performance of its obligations under the note or mortgage, the lender has the right to institute foreclosure proceedings to sell the real property security at public auction to satisfy the indebtedness.

130

Foreclosure Procedures Vary From State to State.  The two primary methods of foreclosing a mortgage are—

● judicial foreclosure, involving court proceedings, and

● nonjudicial foreclosure under a power of sale granted in the mortgage instrument.

Other foreclosure procedures are available in some states, but they are either infrequently used or available only in limited circumstances.

A foreclosure action is subject to most of the delays and expenses of other lawsuits if defenses are raised or counterclaims are interposed.  A foreclosure action sometimes requires several years to complete.

Judicial Foreclosure.  A judicial foreclosure proceeding is conducted in a court having jurisdiction over the mortgaged property.  Generally, a lender initiates the action by the service of legal pleadings upon—

● all parties having a subordinate interest of record in the real property, and

● all parties in possession of the property, under leases or otherwise, whose interests are subordinate to the mortgage.

Delays in completion of the foreclosure may occasionally result from difficulties in locating necessary parties, including defendants.  When the lender’s right to foreclose is contested, the legal proceedings can be time-consuming.  The court generally issues a judgment of foreclosure and appoints a referee or other officer to conduct a public sale of the mortgaged property upon successful completion of a judicial foreclosure proceeding.  The proceeds of that public sale are used to satisfy the judgment.  The procedures that govern these public sales vary from state to state.

Equitable and Other Limitations on Enforceability of Particular Provisions.  United States courts have traditionally imposed general equitable principles to limit the remedies available to lenders in foreclosure actions.  These principles are generally designed to relieve borrowers from the effects of mortgage defaults perceived as harsh or unfair.  Relying on these principles, a court may:

● alter the specific terms of a loan to the extent it considers necessary to prevent or remedy an injustice, undue oppression or overreaching;

● require the lender to undertake affirmative actions to determine the cause of the borrower’s default and the likelihood that the borrower will be able to reinstate the loan;

● require the lender to reinstate a loan or recast a payment schedule in order to accommodate a borrower that is suffering from a temporary financial disability; or

● limit the right of the lender to foreclose in the case of a nonmonetary default, such as—

1. a failure to adequately maintain the mortgaged property, or

2. an impermissible further encumbrance of the mortgaged property.

131

Some courts have addressed the issue of whether federal or state constitutional provisions reflecting due process concerns for adequate notice require that a borrower receive notice in addition to statutorily-prescribed minimum notice.  For the most part, these cases have—

● upheld the reasonableness of the notice provisions, or

● found that a public sale under a mortgage providing for a power of sale does not involve sufficient state action to trigger constitutional protections.

In addition, some states may have statutory protection such as the right of the borrower to reinstate its mortgage loan after commencement of foreclosure proceedings but prior to a foreclosure sale.

Nonjudicial Foreclosure/Power of Sale.  In states permitting nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings, foreclosure of a deed of trust is generally accomplished by a nonjudicial trustee’s sale under a power of sale typically granted in the deed of trust.  A power of sale may also be contained in any other type of mortgage instrument if applicable law so permits.  A power of sale under a deed of trust allows a nonjudicial public sale to be conducted generally following—

● a request from the beneficiary/lender to the trustee to sell the property upon default by the borrower, and

● notice of sale is given in accordance with the terms of the deed of trust and applicable state law.

In some states, prior to a nonjudicial public sale, the trustee under the deed of trust must—

● record a notice of default and notice of sale, and

● send a copy of those notices to the borrower and to any other party who has recorded a request for a copy of them.

In addition, in some states, the trustee must provide notice to any other party having an interest of record in the real property, including junior lienholders.  A notice of sale must be posted in a public place and, in most states, published for a specified period of time in one or more newspapers.  Some states require a reinstatement period during which the borrower or junior lienholder may have the right to cure the default by paying the entire actual amount in arrears, without regard to the acceleration of the indebtedness, plus the lender’s expenses incurred in enforcing the obligation.  In other states, the borrower or the junior lienholder has only the right to pay off the entire debt to prevent the foreclosure sale.  Generally, state law governs the procedure for public sale, the parties entitled to notice, the method of giving notice and the applicable time periods.

Public Sale.  A third party may be unwilling to purchase a mortgaged property at a public sale because of—

● the difficulty in determining the exact status of title to the property due to, among other things, redemption rights that may exist, and

● the possibility that physical deterioration of the property may have occurred during the foreclosure proceedings.

As a result of the foregoing, it is common for the lender to purchase the mortgaged property and become its owner, subject to the borrower’s right in some states to remain in possession during a redemption period.  In that case, the lender will have both the benefits and burdens of ownership, including the obligation to pay debt service on any senior mortgages, to pay taxes, to obtain casualty insurance and to make repairs necessary to render the property suitable for sale.  The costs of operating and maintaining a commercial or multifamily

132

residential property may be significant and may be greater than the income derived from that property.  The lender also will commonly obtain the services of a real estate broker and pay the broker’s commission in connection with the sale or lease of the property.  Whether, the ultimate proceeds of the sale of the property equal the lender’s investment in the property depends upon market conditions.  Moreover, because of the expenses associated with acquiring, owning and selling a mortgaged property, a lender could realize an overall loss on the related mortgage loan even if the mortgaged property is sold at foreclosure, or resold after it is acquired through foreclosure, for an amount equal to the full outstanding principal amount of the loan plus accrued interest.

The holder of a junior mortgage that forecloses on a mortgaged property does so subject to senior mortgages and any other prior liens.  In addition, it may be obliged to keep senior mortgage loans current in order to avoid foreclosure of its interest in the property.  Furthermore, if the foreclosure of a junior mortgage triggers the enforcement of a due-on-sale clause contained in a senior mortgage, the junior mortgagee could be required to pay the full amount of the senior mortgage indebtedness or face foreclosure.

Rights of Redemption.  The purposes of a foreclosure action are—

● to enable the lender to realize upon its security, and

● to bar the borrower, and all persons who have interests in the property that are subordinate to that of the foreclosing lender, from exercising their equity of redemption.

The doctrine of equity of redemption provides that, until the property encumbered by a mortgage has been sold in accordance with a properly conducted foreclosure and foreclosure sale, those having interests that are subordinate to that of the foreclosing lender have an equity of redemption and may redeem the property by paying the entire debt with interest.  Those having an equity of redemption must generally be made parties to the foreclosure proceeding in order for their equity of redemption to be terminated.

The equity of redemption is a common-law, nonstatutory right which should be distinguished from post-sale statutory rights of redemption.  In some states, the borrower and foreclosed junior lienors are given a statutory period in which to redeem the property after sale under a deed of trust or foreclosure of a mortgage.  In some states, statutory redemption may occur only upon payment of the foreclosure sale price.  In other states, redemption may be permitted if the former borrower pays only a portion of the sums due.  A statutory right of redemption will diminish the ability of the lender to sell the foreclosed property because the exercise of a right of redemption would defeat the title of any purchaser through a foreclosure.  Consequently, the practical effect of the redemption right is to force the lender to maintain the property and pay the expenses of ownership until the redemption period has expired.  In some states, a post-sale statutory right of redemption may exist following a judicial foreclosure, but not following a trustee’s sale under a deed of trust.

One Action and Security First Rules.  Some states (including California) have laws that prohibit more than one “judicial action” to enforce a mortgage obligation secured by a mortgage on real property or an interest therein, and some courts have construed the term “judicial action” broadly.  In addition, some states (including California) require that the lender proceed first against any real property security for such mortgage obligation before proceeding directly upon the secured obligation itself.  In the case where either a cross-collateralized, cross-defaulted or a multi-property mortgage loan is secured by real properties located in multiple states, the special servicer may be required to foreclose first on properties located in states where such “one action” and/or “security first” rules apply (and where non-judicial foreclosure is permitted) before foreclosing on properties located in the states where judicial foreclosure is the only permitted method of foreclosure.  Otherwise, a second action in a state with “one action” rules might be precluded because of a prior first action, even if such first action occurred in a state without “one action” rules.  Moreover, while the consequences of breaching these rules will vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, as a general matter, a lender who proceeds in violation of these rules may run the risk of forfeiting collateral and/or even the right to enforce the underlying obligation.  In addition, under certain circumstances, a lender with respect to a real property located in a “one action” or “security first”

133

jurisdiction may be precluded from obtaining a deficiency judgment against the borrower following foreclosure or sale under a deed of trust (unless there has been a judicial foreclosure).  Finally, in some jurisdictions, the benefits of such laws may be available not just to the underlying obligor, but also to any guarantor of the underlying obligation, thereby limiting the ability of the lender to recover against a guarantor without first complying with the applicable anti-deficiency statutes.

Anti-Deficiency Legislation.  Some or all of the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may be nonrecourse loans.  Recourse in the case of a default on a non-recourse mortgage loan will generally be limited to the underlying real property and any other assets that were pledged to secure the mortgage loan.  However, even if a mortgage loan by its terms provides for recourse to the borrower’s other assets, a lender’s ability to realize upon those assets may be limited by state law.  For example, in some states, a lender cannot obtain a deficiency judgment against the borrower following foreclosure or sale pursuant to the “power of sale”  under a deed of trust.  A deficiency judgment is a personal judgment against the former borrower equal to the difference between the net amount realized upon the public sale of the real property and the amount due to the lender.  Other state statutes may require the lender to exhaust the security afforded under a mortgage before bringing a personal action against the borrower.  In  some states, the lender has the option of bringing a personal action against the borrower on the debt without first exhausting the security, but in doing so, the lender may be deemed to have elected a remedy and thus may be precluded from foreclosing upon the security.  Consequently, lenders will usually proceed first against the security in states where an election of remedy provision exists.  Other statutory provisions limit any deficiency judgment to the excess of the outstanding debt over the fair market value of the property at the time of the sale.  These other statutory provisions are intended to protect borrowers from exposure to large deficiency judgments that might otherwise result from below-market bids at the foreclosure sale.  In some states, exceptions to the anti-deficiency statues are provided for in certain instances where the value of the lender’s security has been impaired by acts or omissions of the borrower such as for waste upon the property.  Finally, some statutes may preclude deficiency judgments altogether with respect to certain kinds of obligations such as purchase-money indebtedness.  In some jurisdictions the courts have extended the benefits of this legislation to the guarantors of the underlying obligation as well.

Leasehold Considerations.  Some or all of the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may be secured by a mortgage on the borrower’s leasehold interest under a ground lease.  Leasehold mortgage loans are subject to some risks not associated with mortgage loans secured by a lien on the fee estate of the borrower.  The most significant of these risks is that if the borrower’s leasehold were to be terminated upon a lease default, the leasehold mortgagee would lose its security.  This risk may be lessened if the ground lease:

● requires the lessor to give the leasehold mortgagee notices of lessee defaults and an opportunity to cure them,

● permits the leasehold estate to be assigned to and by the leasehold mortgagee or the purchaser at a foreclosure sale, and

● contains other protective provisions typically required by prudent lenders to be included in a ground lease.

Some mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates, however, may be secured by ground leases which do not contain these provisions.

Cooperative Shares.  Some or all of the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may be secured by a security interest on the borrower’s ownership interest in shares, and the proprietary leases belonging to those shares, allocable to cooperative dwelling units that may be vacant or occupied by nonowner tenants.  Loans secured in this manner are subject to some risks not associated with mortgage loans secured by a lien on the fee estate of a borrower in real property.  Loans secured in this manner typically are subordinate to the mortgage, if any, on the cooperative’s building.  That mortgage, if foreclosed, could extinguish the equity in the

134

building and the proprietary leases of the dwelling units derived from ownership of the shares of the cooperative.  Further, transfer of shares in a cooperative is subject to various regulations as well as to restrictions under the governing documents of the cooperative.  The shares may be canceled in the event that associated maintenance charges due under the related proprietary leases are not paid.  Typically, a recognition agreement between the lender and the cooperative provides, among other things, that the lender may cure a default under a proprietary lease.

Under the laws applicable in many states, “foreclosure” on cooperative shares is accomplished by a sale in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 of the UCC and the security agreement relating to the shares.  Article 9 of the UCC requires that a sale be conducted in a commercially reasonable manner, which may be dependent upon, among other things, the notice given the debtor and the method, manner, time, place and terms of the sale.  Article 9 of the UCC provides that the proceeds of the sale will be applied first to pay the costs and expenses of the sale and then to satisfy the indebtedness secured by the lender’s security interest.  A recognition agreement, however, generally provides that the lender’s right to reimbursement is subject to the right of the cooperative corporation to receive sums due under the proprietary leases.  If there are proceeds remaining, the lender must account to the tenant-stockholder for the surplus.  Conversely, if a portion of the indebtedness remains unpaid, the tenant-stockholder is generally responsible for the deficiency.

In the case of foreclosure on a building converted from a rental building to a building owned by a cooperative under a non-eviction plan, some states require that a purchaser at a foreclosure sale take the property subject to rent control and rent stabilization laws that apply to certain tenants who elected to remain in the building but who did not purchase shares in the cooperative when the building was so converted.

Bankruptcy Issues

Automatic Stay.  Operation of the Bankruptcy Code and related state laws may interfere with or affect the ability of a lender to realize upon collateral or to enforce a deficiency judgment.  For example, under the Bankruptcy Code, virtually all actions, including foreclosure actions and deficiency judgment proceedings, to collect a debt are automatically stayed upon the filing of the bankruptcy petition.  Often, no interest or principal payments are made during the course of the bankruptcy case.  The delay caused by an automatic stay and its consequences can be significant.  Also, under the Bankruptcy Code, the filing of a petition in bankruptcy by or on behalf of a junior lienor may stay the senior lender from taking action to foreclose out the junior lien.

Modification of Lender’s Rights.  Under the Bankruptcy Code, the amount and terms of a mortgage loan secured by a lien on property of the debtor may be modified provided that substantive and procedural safeguards protective of the lender are met.  A bankruptcy court may, among other things—

● reduce the secured portion of the outstanding amount of the loan to the then-current value of the property, thereby leaving the lender a general unsecured creditor for the difference between the then-current value of the property and the outstanding balance of the loan;

● reduce the amount of each scheduled payment, by means of a reduction in the rate of interest and/or an alteration of the repayment schedule, with or without affecting the unpaid principal balance of the loan;

● extend or shorten the term to maturity of the loan;

● permit the bankrupt borrower to cure the subject loan default by paying the arrearage over a number of years; or

135

● permit the bankrupt borrower, through its rehabilitative plan, to reinstate the loan payment schedule even if the lender has obtained a final judgment of foreclosure prior to the filing of the debtor’s petition.

Other types of significant modifications to the terms of the mortgage may be acceptable to the bankruptcy court, such as making distributions to the mortgage holder of property other than cash, or the substitution of collateral which is the “indubitable equivalent” of the real property subject to the mortgage or the subordination of the mortgage to liens securing new debt (provided that the lender’s secured claim is “adequately protected” as such term is defined and interpreted under the Bankruptcy Code), depending on the particular facts and circumstances of the specific case.

A trustee in a bankruptcy proceeding may in some cases be entitled to collect its costs and expenses in preserving or selling the mortgaged property ahead of payment to the lender. In certain circumstances, a debtor in bankruptcy may have the power to grant liens senior to the lien of a mortgage, and analogous state statutes and general principles of equity may also provide the borrower with means to halt a foreclosure proceeding or sale and to force a restructuring of a mortgage loan on terms a lender would not otherwise accept. Moreover, the laws of certain states also give priority to certain tax liens and mechanics liens over the lien of a mortgage or deed of trust. Under the Bankruptcy Code, if the court finds that actions of the mortgagees have been unreasonable, the lien of the related mortgage may be subordinated to the claims of unsecured creditors. Federal bankruptcy law also may interfere with the ability of the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, for one of our trusts to enforce lockbox requirements.

Leases and Rents.  Federal bankruptcy law may also interfere with or affect the ability of a secured lender to enforce the borrower’s assignment of rents and leases related to the mortgaged property.  Federal bankruptcy law provides generally that rights and obligations under an unexpired lease of the debtor/lessee may not be terminated or modified at any time after the commencement of a case under the Bankruptcy Code solely on the basis of a provision in the lease to that effect or because of certain other similar events.  This prohibition on so called “ipso facto clauses” could limit the ability of the master servicer or special servicer, as applicable, for one of our trusts to exercise certain contractual remedies with respect to any related leases.  In addition, a lender may be stayed from enforcing the assignment under the Bankruptcy Code, and the legal proceedings necessary to resolve the issue could be time-consuming, and result in delays in the lender’s receipt of the rents.  Rents and leases may also escape an assignment thereof (i) if the assignment is not fully perfected under state law prior to commencement of the bankruptcy proceeding, (ii) to the extent such rents and leases are used by the borrower to maintain the mortgaged property, or for other court authorized expenses, (iii) to the extent other collateral may be substituted for the rents and leases, (iv) to the extent the bankruptcy court determines that the lender is adequately protected or (v) to the extent the court determines, based on the equities of the case, that the post-petition rents are not subject to the lender’s pre-petition security interest.

Under the Bankruptcy Code, a security interest in real property acquired before the commencement of the bankruptcy case does not extend to income received after the commencement of the bankruptcy case unless such income is a proceed, product or rent of such property. Therefore, to the extent a business conducted on the mortgaged property creates accounts receivable rather than rents or results from payments under a license rather than payments under a lease, a valid and perfected pre-bankruptcy lien on such accounts receivable or license income generally would not continue as to post-bankruptcy accounts receivable or license income.  The Bankruptcy Code has been amended to mitigate this problem with respect to fees, charges, accounts or other payments for the use or occupancy of rooms and other public facilities in hotels, motels or other lodging facilities. A lender’s perfected pre-petition security interest in leases, rents and hotel revenues continues in the post-petition leases, rents and hotel, motel and other lodging property revenues, unless a bankruptcy court orders to the contrary “based on the equities of the case.”  The equities of a particular case may permit the discontinuance of security interests in post petition leases and rents.  Unless a court orders otherwise, however, rents and other revenues from the related lodging property generated after the date the bankruptcy petition is filed will constitute “cash collateral” under the Bankruptcy Code.  Debtors may only use cash collateral upon obtaining the lender’s

136

consent or a prior court order finding that the lender’s interest in such mortgaged property and the cash collateral is “adequately protected” as such term is defined and interpreted under the Bankruptcy Code.  In addition to post-petition rents, any cash held by a lender in a lockbox or reserve account generally, upon the commencement of the bankruptcy case, would also constitute “cash collateral” under the Bankruptcy Code.  So long as the lender is adequately protected, a debtor’s use of cash collateral may be for its own benefit or for the benefit of any affiliated entity group that is also subject to bankruptcy proceedings, including use as collateral for new debt.  It should be noted, however, that the court may find that the lender has no security interest in either pre-petition or post-petition revenues if the court finds that the loan documents do not contain language covering accounts, room rents, or other forms of personalty necessary for a security interest to attach to such revenues.

In addition to the inclusion of hotel revenues within the definition of cash collateral as noted above, recent amendments to the Bankruptcy Code provide that a pre-petition security interest in rents or hotel revenues is designed to overcome those cases holding that a security interest in rents is unperfected under the laws of some states until the lender has taken some further action, such as commencing foreclosure or obtaining a receiver prior to activation of the assignment of rents.

Lease Assumption or Rejection by Tenant.  A borrower’s ability to make payment on a mortgage loan may be impaired by the commencement of a bankruptcy case relating to the tenant under a lease of the related property.  Under the Bankruptcy Code, the filing of a petition in bankruptcy by or on behalf of a tenant results in a stay in bankruptcy against the commencement or continuation of any state court proceeding for—

● past due rent,

● accelerated rent,

● damages, or

● a summary eviction order with respect to a default under the lease that occurred prior to the filing of the tenant’s bankruptcy petition.

In addition, the Bankruptcy Code generally provides that a trustee or debtor-in-possession may, subject to approval of the court:

● assume the lease and either retain it or assign it to a third party, or

● reject the lease.

If the lease is assumed, the trustee, debtor-in-possession or assignee, if applicable, must cure any defaults under the lease, compensate the lessor for its losses and provide the lessor with adequate assurance of future performance.  These remedies may be insufficient, and any assurances provided to the lessor may be inadequate.  If the lease is rejected, the lessor will be treated, except potentially to the extent of any security deposit, as an unsecured creditor with respect to its claim for damages for termination of the lease.  The Bankruptcy Code also limits a lessor’s damages for lease rejection to:

● the unpaid rent due under the lease, without acceleration, for the period prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition or any earlier repossession by the landlord, or surrender by the tenant, of the leased premises, plus

● the rent reserved by the lease, without acceleration, for the greater of one year and 15%, not to exceed three years, of the term of the lease following the filing of the bankruptcy petition or any earlier repossession by the landlord, or surrender by the tenant, of the leased premises.

137

Lease Rejection by Lessor – Tenant’s Right.  If a trustee in bankruptcy on behalf of a lessor, or a lessor as debtor in possession, rejects an unexpired lease of real property, the lessee may treat the lease as terminated by the rejection or, in the alternative, the lessee may remain in possession of the leasehold for the balance of the term and for any renewal or extension of the term that is enforceable by the lessee under applicable non-bankruptcy law.  The Bankruptcy Code provides that if a lessee elects to remain in possession after a rejection of a lease, the lessee may offset against rents reserved under the lease for the balance of the term after the date of rejection of the lease, and the related renewal or extension of the lease, any damages occurring after that date caused by the nonperformance of any obligation of the lessor under the lease after that date.  To the extent that the contractual obligation remains enforceable against the lessee, the lessee would not be able to avail itself of the rights of offset generally afforded to lessees of real property under the Bankruptcy Code.

Single Purpose Entity Covenants and Substantive Consolidation. Although the borrowers under the mortgage loans included in a trust fund may be special purpose entities, special purpose entities can become debtors in bankruptcy under various circumstances. For example, in the recent bankruptcy case of In re General Growth Properties, Inc. 409 B.R. 43 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1999), notwithstanding that such subsidiaries were special purpose entities with independent directors, numerous property-level, special purpose subsidiaries were filed for bankruptcy protection by their parent entity.  Nonetheless, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York denied various lenders’ motions to dismiss the special purpose entity subsidiaries’ cases as bad faith filings.  In denying the motions, the bankruptcy court stated that the fundamental and bargained for creditor protections embedded in the special purpose entity structures at the property level would remain in place during the pendency of the chapter 11 cases.  Those protections included adequate protection of the lenders’ interest in their collateral and protection against the substantive consolidation of the property-level debtors with any other entities.

The moving lenders in the General Growth case had argued that the 20 property-level bankruptcy filings were premature and improperly sought to restructure the debt of solvent entities for the benefit of equity holders.  However, the Bankruptcy Code does not require that a voluntary debtor be insolvent or unable to pay its debts currently in order to be eligible for relief and generally a bankruptcy petition will not be dismissed for bad faith if the debtor has a legitimate rehabilitation objective.  Accordingly, after finding that the relevant debtors were experiencing varying degrees of financial distress due to factors such as cross defaults, a need to refinance in the near term (i.e., within 1 to 4 years), and other considerations, the bankruptcy court noted that it was not required to analyze in isolation each debtor’s basis for filing.  In the court’s view, the critical issue was whether a parent company that had filed its bankruptcy case in good faith could include in the filing subsidiaries that were necessary for the parent’s reorganization.  As demonstrated in the General Growth Properties bankruptcy case, although special purpose entities are designed to mitigate the bankruptcy risk of a borrower, special purpose entities can become debtors in bankruptcy under various circumstances.

Generally, pursuant to the doctrine of substantive consolidation, a bankruptcy court, in the exercise of its broad equitable powers, has the authority to order that the assets and liabilities of a borrower be substantively consolidated with those of an affiliate (i.e., even a non-debtor), including for the purposes of making distributions under a plan of reorganization or liquidation.  Thus, property that is ostensibly the property of a borrower may become subject to the bankruptcy case of an affiliate, the automatic stay applicable to such bankrupt affiliate may be extended to a borrower, and the rights of creditors of a borrower may become impaired.  Substantive consolidation is generally viewed as an equitable remedy that could result in an otherwise solvent company becoming subject to the bankruptcy proceedings of an insolvent affiliate, making the solvent company’s assets available to repay the debts of affiliated companies.  A court has the discretion to order substantive consolidation in whole or in part and may include non-debtor affiliates of the bankrupt entity in the proceedings.  The interrelationship among a borrower and other affiliates may pose a heightened risk of substantive consolidation and other bankruptcy risks in the event that any one or more of them were to become a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code.  In the event of the bankruptcy of the applicable parent entities of any borrower, the assets of such borrower may be treated as part of the bankruptcy estates of such parent entities.  In addition, in the event of the institution of voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy proceedings involving a borrower and certain of its

138

affiliates, to serve judicial economy, it is likely that a court would jointly administer the respective bankruptcy proceedings.  Furthermore, with respect to any affiliated borrowers, creditors of a common parent in bankruptcy may seek to substantively consolidate the assets of such borrowers with those of the parent.

Sales Free and Clear of Liens.  Under Sections 363(b) and (f) of the Bankruptcy Code, a trustee, or a borrower as debtor in possession, may, despite the provisions of the related mortgage to the contrary, sell the related mortgaged property free and clear of all liens, which liens would then attach to the proceeds of such sale.  Such a sale may be approved by a bankruptcy court even if the proceeds are insufficient to pay the secured debt in full.

Post-Petition Credit.  Pursuant to Section 364 of the Bankruptcy Code, a bankruptcy court may, under certain circumstances, authorize a debtor to obtain credit after the commencement of a bankruptcy case, secured among other things, by senior, equal or junior liens on property that is already subject to a lien.  In the recent bankruptcy case of General Growth Properties, the debtors initially sought approval of a debtor-in-possession loan to the corporate parent entities guaranteed by the property-level special purpose entities and secured by second liens on their properties.  Although the debtor-in-possession loan ultimately did not include these subsidiary guarantees and second liens, we cannot assure you that, in the event of a bankruptcy of a sponsor of a borrower, such sponsor would not seek approval of a similar debtor-in-possession loan, or that a bankruptcy court would not approve a debtor-in-possession loan that included such subsidiary guarantees and second liens on such subsidiaries’ properties.

Avoidance Actions.  In a bankruptcy or similar proceeding involving a borrower, action may be taken seeking the recovery as a preferential transfer of any payments made by such borrower under a mortgage loan or to avoid the granting of the liens in the transaction in the first instance, or any replacement liens that arise by operation of law or the security agreement.  Payments on long term debt may be protected from recovery as preferences if they qualify for the “ordinary course” exception under the Bankruptcy Code or if certain of the other defenses in the Bankruptcy Code are applicable.  Whether any particular payment would be protected depends upon the facts specific to a particular transaction.  In addition, in a bankruptcy or similar proceeding involving any borrower, an action may be taken to avoid the transaction (or any component of the transaction, such as joint and several liability on a mortgage loan) as an actual or constructive fraudulent conveyance under state or federal law.

Generally, under federal law and most state fraudulent conveyance statutes, the incurrence of an obligation or the transfer of property by a person will be subject to avoidance if it was made with actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors, as evidenced by certain “badges” of fraud.  It also will be subject to avoidance under certain circumstances as a constructive fraudulent transfer if the transferor did not receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value in exchange for such obligation or transfer and (i) was insolvent or was rendered insolvent by such obligation or transfer, (ii) was engaged in business or a transaction, or was about to engage in business or a transaction, for which any property remaining with the transferor constituted unreasonably small capital, or (iii) intended to, or believed that it would, incur debts that would be beyond the transferor’s ability to pay as such debts matured. The measure of insolvency will vary depending on the law of the applicable jurisdiction.  However, an entity will generally be considered insolvent if the present fair salable value of its assets is less than (x) the sum of its debts or (y) the amount that would be required to pay its probable liabilities on its existing debts as they become absolute and matured. Accordingly, cross-collateralization arrangements could be challenged as fraudulent transfers by creditors of a borrower in an action brought outside a bankruptcy case or, if the borrower were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case, by the borrower as a debtor in possession or its bankruptcy trustee.  Among other things, a legal challenge to the granting of liens may focus on the benefits realized by the borrower from the mortgage loan proceeds, in addition to the overall cross-collateralization.  A lien or other property transfer granted by a borrower to secure repayment of a loan could be avoided if a court were to determine that (i) such borrower was insolvent at the time of granting the lien, was rendered insolvent by the granting of the lien, was left with inadequate capital, or was not able to pay its debts as they matured and (ii)

139

the borrower did not, when it allowed its property to be encumbered by a lien securing the entire indebtedness represented by the loan, receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value for pledging such property.

Management Agreements.  It is likely that any management agreement relating to the mortgaged properties constitutes an “executory contract” for purposes of the Bankruptcy Code. Federal bankruptcy law provides generally that rights and obligations under an executory contract of a debtor may not be terminated or modified at any time after the commencement of a case under the Bankruptcy Code solely on the basis of a provision in such contract to such effect or because of certain other similar events.  This prohibition on so-called “ipso facto” clauses could limit the ability of the related borrower (or the trustee as its assignee) to exercise certain contractual remedies with respect to a management agreement relating to any such mortgaged property.  In addition, the Bankruptcy Code provides that a trustee in bankruptcy or debtor-in-possession may, subject to approval of the court, (a) assume an executory contract and (i) retain it or (ii) unless applicable law excuses a party other than the debtor from accepting performance from or rendering performance to an entity other than the debtor, assign it to a third party (notwithstanding any other restrictions or prohibitions on assignment) or (b) reject such contract. In a bankruptcy case of the related property manager, if the related management agreement(s) were to be assumed, the trustee in bankruptcy on behalf of such property manager, or such property manager as debtor-in-possession, or the assignee, if applicable, must cure any defaults under such agreement(s), compensate the borrower for its losses and provide the borrower with “adequate assurance” of future performance.  Such remedies may be insufficient, however, as the related borrower may be forced to continue under a management agreement with a manager that is a poor credit risk or an unfamiliar manager if a management agreement was assigned (if applicable state law does not otherwise prevent such an assignment), and any assurances provided to the borrower may, in fact, be inadequate. If a management agreement is rejected, such rejection generally constitutes a breach of the executory contract immediately before the date of the filing of the petition.  As a consequence, the related borrower generally would have only an unsecured claim against the related property manager for damages resulting from such breach, which could adversely affect the security for the offered certificates.

Certain of the Borrowers May Be Partnerships.  The laws governing limited partnerships in certain states provide that the commencement of a case under the Bankruptcy Code with respect to a general partner will cause a person to cease to be a general partner of the limited partnership, unless otherwise provided in writing in the limited partnership agreement.  This provision may be construed as an “ipso facto” clause and, in the event of the general partner’s bankruptcy, may not be enforceable.  Certain limited partnership agreements of the borrowers may provide that the commencement of a case under the Bankruptcy Code with respect to the related general partner constitutes an event of withdrawal (assuming the enforceability of the clause is not challenged in bankruptcy proceedings or, if challenged, is upheld) that might trigger the dissolution of the limited partnership, the winding up of its affairs and the distribution of its assets, unless (i) at the time there was at least one other general partner and the written provisions of the limited partnership permit the business of the limited partnership to be carried on by the remaining general partner and that general partner does so or (ii) the written provisions of the limited partnership agreement permit the limited partners to agree within a specified time frame (often 60 days) after the withdrawal to continue the business of the limited partnership and to the appointment of one or more general partners and the limited partners do so.  In addition, the laws governing general partnerships in certain states provide that the commencement of a case under the Bankruptcy Code or state bankruptcy laws with respect to a general partner of the partnerships triggers the dissolution of the partnership, the winding up of its affairs and the distribution of its assets.  Those state laws, however, may not be enforceable or effective in a bankruptcy case.  Limited liability companies may be subjected to similar treatment as that described in this prospectus with respect to limited partnerships.  The dissolution of a borrower, the winding up of its affairs and the distribution of its assets could result in an acceleration of its payment obligation under the borrower’s mortgage loan.

In addition, the bankruptcy of the general or limited partner of a borrower that is a partnership, or the bankruptcy of a member of a borrower that is a limited liability company or the bankruptcy of a shareholder of a borrower that is a corporation may provide the opportunity in the bankruptcy case of the partner, member or shareholder to obtain an order from a court consolidating the assets and liabilities of the partner, member or

140

shareholder with those of the mortgagor pursuant to the doctrines of substantive consolidation or piercing the corporate veil.  In such a case, the respective mortgaged property, for example, would become property of the estate of the bankrupt partner, member or shareholder.  Not only would the mortgaged property be available to satisfy the claims of creditors of the partner, member or shareholder, but an automatic stay would apply to any attempt by the related master servicer or special servicer to exercise remedies with respect to the mortgaged property.  However, such an occurrence should not affect the trustee’s status as a secured creditor with respect to the borrower or its security interest in the mortgaged property.

A borrower that is a limited partnership, in many cases, may be required by the loan documents to have a special purpose entity as its sole general partner, and a borrower that is a general partnership, in many cases, may be required by the loan documents to have as its general partners only entities that are special purpose entities.  A borrower that is a limited liability company may be required by the loan documents to have a special purpose member or a springing member.  Borrowers that are tenants-in-common may be required by the loan documents to be special purpose entities.  These provisions are designed to mitigate the risk of the dissolution or bankruptcy of the borrower partnership or its general partner, a borrower limited liability company or its member (if applicable), or a borrower that is a tenant-in-common.  However, we cannot assure you that any borrower partnership or its general partner, or any borrower limited liability company or its member (if applicable), or a borrower that is a tenant-in-common, will not dissolve or become a debtor under the Bankruptcy Code.

Environmental Considerations

General.  A lender may be subject to environmental risks when taking a security interest in real property.  Of particular concern may be properties that are or have been used for industrial, manufacturing, military or disposal activity.  Those environmental risks include the possible diminution of the value of a contaminated property or, as discussed below, potential liability for clean-up costs or other remedial actions that could exceed the value of the property or the amount of the lender’s loan.  In some circumstances, a lender may decide to abandon a contaminated real property as collateral for its loan rather than foreclose and risk liability for clean-up costs.

Environmental Assessments.  Environmental reports are generally prepared for mortgage properties that will be included in each mortgage pool.  At the time the mortgage loans were originated, it is possible that no environmental assessment or a very limited environmental assessment of the mortgaged properties was conducted.

Superlien Laws.  Under the laws of certain states, failure to perform any investigative and/or remedial action required or demanded by the state of any condition or circumstance that (i) may pose an imminent or substantial endangerment to the human health or welfare or the environment, (ii) may result in a release or threatened release of any hazardous material or hazardous substance, or (iii) may give rise to any environmental claim or demand (each condition or circumstance, an “Environmental Condition”), may give rise to a lien on the property to ensure the reimbursement of investigative and/or remedial costs incurred by the federal or state government. In several states, the lien has priority over the lien of an existing mortgage against the property. In any case, the value of a mortgaged property as collateral for a mortgage loan could be adversely affected by the existence of an Environmental Condition..

CERCLA.  The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, imposes strict liability on present and past “owners” and “operators” of contaminated real property for the costs of clean-up.  A secured lender may be liable as an “owner” or “operator” of a contaminated mortgaged property if agents or employees of the lender have participated in the management of the property or the operations of the borrower.  Liability may exist even if the lender did not cause or contribute to the contamination and regardless of whether the lender has actually taken possession of the contaminated mortgaged property through foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure or otherwise.  Moreover, liability is not limited to the original or unamortized principal balance of a loan or to the value of the property securing a loan.  Excluded from

141

CERCLA’s definition of “owner” or “operator,” however, is a person who, without participating in the management of the facility, holds indicia of ownership primarily to protect his security interest.  This is the so called “secured creditor exemption.”

The Asset Conservation, Lender Liability and Deposit Insurance Act of 1996 (the “Lender Liability Act”) amended, among other things, the provisions of CERCLA with respect to lender liability and the secured creditor exemption.  The Lender Liability Act offers substantial protection to lenders by defining the activities in which a lender can engage and still have the benefit of the secured creditor exemption.  In order for a lender to be deemed to have participated in the management of a mortgaged property, the lender must actually participate in the operational affairs of the property of the borrower.  The Lender Liability Act provides that “merely having the capacity to influence, or unexercised right to control” operations does not constitute participation in management.  A lender will lose the protection of the secured creditor exemption only if—

● it exercises decision-making control over a borrower’s environmental compliance and hazardous substance handling and disposal practices, or

● assumes day-to-day management of operational functions of a mortgaged property.

The Lender Liability Act also provides that a lender will continue to have the benefit of the secured creditor exemption even if it forecloses on a mortgaged property, purchases it at a foreclosure sale or accepts a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, provided that the lender seeks to sell that property at the earliest practicable commercially reasonable time on commercially reasonable terms.

CERCLA does not apply to petroleum products, and the secured creditor exclusion does not govern liability for cleanup costs under federal laws other than CERCLA, in particular Subtitle I of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), which regulates underground petroleum storage tanks, except heating oil tanks.  The EPA has adopted a lender liability rule for underground storage tanks (USTs) under Subtitle I of RCRA.  Under that rule a lender with a security interest in an UST or real property containing an UST is not liable as an “owner” or “operator” so long as the lender does not engage in decision making control of the use, storage, filing or dispensing of petroleum contained in the UST, exercise control over the daily operation of the UST, or engage in petroleum production, refining or marketing.  Moreover, under the Lender Liability Act, the protections accorded to lenders under CERCLA are also accorded to holders of security interests in underground petroleum storage tanks.  It should be noted, however, that liability for cleanup of petroleum contamination may be governed by state law, which may not provide for any specific protection for secured creditors, or alternatively, may not impose liability on secured creditors at all.

Other Federal and State Laws.  Many states have statutes similar to CERCLA, and not all those statutes provide for a secured creditor exemption.  In addition, under federal law, there is potential liability relating to hazardous wastes and underground storage tanks under the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.

Some federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances govern the management, removal, encapsulation or disturbance of asbestos-containing materials.  These laws, as well as common law standards, may—

● impose liability for releases of or exposure to asbestos-containing materials, and

● provide for third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injuries associated with those releases.

Federal law requires owners of residential housing constructed prior to 1978 to disclose to potential residents or purchasers any known information in their possession regarding the presence of lead-based paint or lead-based paint-related hazards and will impose treble damages for any failure to disclose.  In addition, the

142

ingestion of lead-based paint chips or dust particles by children can result in lead poisoning.  If lead-based paint hazards exist at a property, then the owner of that property may be held liable for injuries and for the costs of removal or encapsulation of the lead-based paint.

In a few states, transfers of some types of properties are conditioned upon cleanup of contamination prior to transfer.  In these cases, a lender that becomes the owner of a property through foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure or otherwise, may be required to clean up the contamination before selling or otherwise transferring the property.

Beyond statute-based environmental liability, there exist common law causes of action related to hazardous environmental conditions on a property, such as actions based on nuisance or on toxic tort resulting in death, personal injury or damage to property.  While it may be more difficult to hold a lender liable under common law causes of action, unanticipated or uninsured liabilities of the borrower may jeopardize the borrower’s ability to meet its loan obligations.

Federal, state and local environmental regulatory requirements change often.  It is possible that compliance with a new regulatory requirement could impose significant compliance costs on a borrower.  These costs may jeopardize the borrower’s ability to meet its loan obligations.

Additional Considerations.  The cost of remediating hazardous substance contamination at a property can be substantial.  If a lender becomes liable, it can bring an action for contribution against the owner or operator who created the environmental hazard.  However, that individual or entity may be without substantial assets.  Accordingly, it is possible that the costs could become a liability of the related trust and occasion a loss to the related certificateholders.  Furthermore, such action against the borrower may be adversely affected by the limitations on recourse in the related loan documents. Similarly, in some states anti-deficiency legislation and other statutes requiring the lender to exhaust its security before bringing a personal action against the borrower trustor (see “—Foreclosure—Anti-Deficiency Legislation” above) may curtail the lender’s ability to recover from its borrower the environmental clean-up and other related costs and liabilities incurred by the lender.

If the operations on a foreclosed property are subject to environmental laws and regulations, the lender will be required to operate the property in accordance with those laws and regulations.  This compliance may entail substantial expense, especially in the case of industrial or manufacturing properties.

The related pooling and servicing agreement will provide that the master servicer or the special servicer, if any, acting on behalf of the related trust fund, may not acquire title to, or possession of, a mortgaged property underlying a mortgage loan, take over its operation or take any other action that might subject a given trust fund to liability under CERCLA or comparable laws unless the master servicer or special servicer, if any, has previously determined, based upon a Phase I environmental site assessment (as described below) or other specified environmental assessment prepared by a person who regularly conducts the environmental assessments, that the mortgaged property is in compliance with applicable environmental laws and that there are no circumstances relating to use, management or disposal of any hazardous materials for which investigation, monitoring, containment, clean up or remediation could be required under applicable environmental laws, or that it would be in the best economic interest of a given trust fund to take any actions as are necessary to bring the mortgaged property into compliance with those laws or as may be required under the laws. A Phase I environmental site assessment generally involves identification of recognized environmental conditions (as defined in Guideline E1527-00 of the American Society for Testing and Materials Guidelines) and/or historic recognized environmental conditions (as defined in Guideline E1527-00 of the American Society for Testing and Materials Guidelines) based on records review, site reconnaissance and interviews, but does not involve a more intrusive investigation such as sampling or testing of materials.  This requirement is intended to preclude enforcement of the security for the related mortgage loan until a satisfactory environmental assessment is obtained or any legally required remedial action is taken, reducing the likelihood that a given trust fund will become liable for any Environmental Condition affecting a mortgaged property, but making it more difficult to realize on the

143

security for the mortgage loan. However, we cannot assure you that any environmental assessment obtained by the master servicer or the special servicer, if any, will detect all possible Environmental Conditions or that the other requirements of the  related pooling and servicing agreement, even if fully observed by the master servicer and the special servicer, if any, will in fact insulate a given trust fund from liability for Environmental Conditions.

In addition, a lender may be obligated to disclose environmental conditions on a property to government entities and/or to prospective buyers, including prospective buyers at a foreclosure sale or following foreclosure.  This disclosure may decrease the amount that prospective buyers are willing to pay for the affected property, sometimes substantially.

Due-on-Sale and Due-on-Encumbrance Provisions

Some or all of the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may contain due-on-sale and due-on-encumbrance clauses that purport to permit the lender to accelerate the maturity of the loan if the borrower transfers or encumbers the mortgaged property.  In recent years, court decisions and legislative actions placed substantial restrictions on the right of lenders to enforce these clauses in many states.  However, the Garn-St Germain Depository Institutions Act of 1982 generally preempts state laws that prohibit the enforcement of due-on-sale clauses and permits lenders to enforce these clauses in accordance with their terms, subject to the limitations prescribed in that Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder.  The inability to enforce a due-on-sale clause may result in transfer of the related mortgaged property to an uncreditworthy person, which could increase the likelihood of default, which may affect the average life of the mortgage loans and the number of mortgage loans which may extend to maturity.

Unless otherwise specified in the related prospectus supplement, the pooling and servicing agreement for each series will provide that if any mortgage loan contains a provision in the nature of a “due on sale” clause, which by its terms provides that: (i) the mortgage loan shall (or may at the mortgagee’s option) become due and payable upon the sale or other transfer of an interest in the related mortgaged property; or (ii) the mortgage loan may not be assumed without the consent of the related mortgagee in connection with any sale or other transfer, then, for so long as the mortgage loan is included in the related trust fund, the related master servicer or special servicer, on behalf of the related trustee, shall take actions as it deems to be in the best interest of the certificateholders in accordance with the servicing standard set forth in the related pooling and servicing agreement, and may waive or enforce any due on sale clause contained in the related mortgage loan, in each case subject to any consent rights of the special servicer (in the case of an action by the master servicer) and the controlling class representative.

In addition, under federal bankruptcy law, due-on-sale clauses may not be enforceable in bankruptcy proceedings and may, under certain circumstances, be eliminated in any modified mortgage resulting from the bankruptcy proceeding.

Junior Liens; Rights of Holders of Senior Liens

Any of our trusts may include mortgage loans secured by junior liens, while the loans secured by the related senior liens may not be included in that trust.  The primary risk to holders of mortgage loans secured by junior liens is the possibility that adequate funds will not be received in connection with a foreclosure of the related senior liens to satisfy fully both the senior loans and the junior loan.

In the event that a holder of a senior lien forecloses on a mortgaged property, the proceeds of the foreclosure or similar sale will be applied as follows:

● first, to the payment of court costs and fees in connection with the foreclosure;

● second, to real estate taxes;

144

● third, in satisfaction of all principal, interest, prepayment or acceleration penalties, if any, and any other sums due and owing to the holder of the senior liens; and

● last, in satisfaction of all principal, interest, prepayment and acceleration penalties, if any, and any other sums due and owing to the holder of the junior mortgage loan.

Subordinate Financing

Some mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may not restrict the ability of the borrower to use the mortgaged property as security for one or more additional loans, or the restrictions may be unenforceable.  Where a borrower encumbers a mortgaged property with one or more junior liens, the senior lender is subjected to the following additional risks:

● the borrower may have difficulty servicing and repaying multiple loans;

● if the subordinate financing permits recourse to the borrower, as is frequently the case, and the senior loan does not, a borrower may have more incentive to repay sums due on the subordinate loan;

● acts of the senior lender that prejudice the junior lender or impair the junior lender’s security, such as the senior lender’s agreeing to an increase in the principal amount of or the interest rate payable on the senior loan, may create a superior equity in favor of the junior lender;

● if the borrower defaults on the senior loan and/or any junior loan or loans, the existence of junior loans and actions taken by junior lenders can impair the security available to the senior lender and can interfere with or delay the taking of action by the senior lender; and

● the bankruptcy of a junior lender may operate to stay foreclosure or similar proceedings by the senior lender.

Default Interest and Limitations on Prepayments

Notes and mortgages may contain provisions that obligate the borrower to pay a late charge or additional interest if payments are not timely made.  They may also contain provisions that prohibit prepayments for a specified period and/or condition prepayments upon the borrower’s payment of prepayment premium, fee or charge.  In some states, there are or may be specific limitations upon the late charges that a lender may collect from a borrower for delinquent payments.  Some states also limit the amounts that a lender may collect from a borrower as an additional charge if the loan is prepaid.  In addition, the enforceability of provisions that provide for prepayment premiums, fees and charges upon an involuntary prepayment is unclear under the laws of many states.  Some state statutory provisions may also treat certain prepayment premiums, fees and charges as usurious if in excess of statutory limits. See “—Applicability of Usury Laws” below.

Further, some of the mortgage loans underlying a series of offered certificates may not require the payment of specified fees as a condition to prepayment or these requirements have expired, and to the extent some mortgage loans do require these fees, these fees may not necessarily deter borrowers from prepaying their mortgage loans.

Applicability of Usury Laws

State and federal usury laws limit the interest that lenders are entitled to receive on a mortgage loan. In determining whether a given transaction is usurious, courts may include charges in the form of “points” and “fees” as “interest”, but may exclude payments in the form of “reimbursement of foreclosure expenses” or other

145

charges found to be distinct from “interest”.  If, however, the amount charged for the use of the money loaned is found to exceed a statutorily established maximum rate, the loan is generally found usurious regardless of the form employed or the degree of overcharge.  Title V of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“Title V”) provides that state usury limitations shall not apply to various types of residential, including multifamily, first mortgage loans originated by particular lenders after March 31, 1980.  Title V authorized any state to reimpose interest rate limits by adopting, before April 1, 1983, a law or constitutional provision that expressly rejects application of the federal law.  In addition, even where Title V is not rejected, any state is authorized by the law to adopt a provision limiting discount points or other charges on mortgage loans covered by Title V.  Some states have taken action to reimpose interest rate limits and/or to limit discount points or other charges.

Statutes differ in their provisions as to the consequences of a usurious loan.  One group of statutes requires the lender to forfeit the interest due above the applicable limit or imposes a specified penalty.  Under this statutory scheme, the borrower may cancel the recorded mortgage or deed of trust upon paying its debt with lawful interest, and the lender may foreclose, but only for the debt plus lawful interest.  A second group of statutes is more severe.  A violation of this type of usury law results in the invalidation of the transaction, permitting the borrower to cancel the recorded mortgage or deed of trust without any payment or prohibiting the lender from foreclosing.

Americans with Disabilities Act

Under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and rules promulgated thereunder, in order to protect individuals with disabilities, owners of public accommodations, such as hotels, restaurants, shopping centers, hospitals, schools and social service center establishments, must remove architectural and communication barriers which are structural in nature from existing places of public accommodation to the extent “readily achievable.”  In addition, under the ADA, alterations to a place of public accommodation or a commercial facility are to be made so that, to the maximum extent feasible, the  altered portions are readily accessible to and usable by disabled individuals.  The “readily achievable” standard takes into account, among other factors, the financial resources of the affected property owner, landlord or other applicable person.  In addition to imposing a possible financial burden on the borrower in its capacity as owner or landlord, the ADA may also impose requirements on a foreclosing lender who succeeds to the interest of the borrower as owner or landlord.  Furthermore, because the “readily achievable” standard may vary depending on the financial condition of the owner or landlord, a foreclosing lender that is financially more capable than the borrower of complying with the requirements of the ADA may be subject to more stringent requirements than those to which the borrower is subject.

Servicemembers Civil Relief Act

Under the terms of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, a borrower who enters military service after the origination of the borrower’s mortgage loan, including a borrower who was in reserve status and is called to active duty after origination of the mortgage loan, may not be charged interest, including fees and charges, above an annual rate of 6% during the period of the borrower’s active duty status, unless a court orders otherwise upon application of the lender.  The Relief Act applies to individuals who are members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, National Guard, Reserves, Coast Guard and officers of the U.S. Public Health Service assigned to duty with the military.  Because the Relief Act applies to individuals who enter military service, including reservists who are called to active duty, after origination of the related mortgage loan, no information can be provided as to the number of loans with individuals as borrowers that may be affected by the Relief Act.

Application of the Relief Act would adversely affect, for an indeterminate period of time, the ability of a master servicer or special servicer to collect full amounts of interest on an affected mortgage loan.  Any shortfalls in interest collections resulting from the application of the Relief Act would result in a reduction of the amounts payable to the holders of certificates of the related series, and would not be covered by advances or, unless otherwise specified in the related prospectus supplement, any form of credit support provided in connection with

146

the certificates.  In addition, the Relief Act imposes limitations that would impair the ability of a master servicer or special servicer to foreclose on an affected mortgage loan during the borrower’s period of active duty status and, under some circumstances, during an additional three month period after the active duty status ceases.

In addition, pursuant to the laws of various states, under certain circumstances, payments on mortgage loans by residents in such states who are called into active duty with the National Guard or the reserves will be deferred.  These state laws may also limit the ability of the master servicer to foreclose on the related mortgaged property.  This could result in delays or reductions in payment and increased losses on the mortgage loans that would be borne by certificateholders.

Anti-Money Laundering, Economic Sanctions and Bribery

Many jurisdictions have adopted wide-ranging anti-money laundering, economic and trade sanctions, and anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws, and regulations (collectively, the “Requirements”).  Any of the Depositor, the trust fund, the underwriters, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee or the certificate administrator could be requested or required to obtain certain assurances from prospective investors intending to purchase offered certificates and to retain such information or to disclose information pertaining to them to governmental, regulatory or other authorities or to financial intermediaries or engage in due diligence or take other related actions in the future.  It is the policy of the Depositor, the trust fund, the underwriters, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee and the certificate administrator to comply with the Requirements to which they are or may become subject and to interpret such Requirements broadly in favor of disclosure.  Failure to honor any request by the Depositor, the trust fund, the underwriters, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee or the certificate administrator to provide requested information or take such other actions as may be necessary or advisable for the Depositor, the trust fund, the underwriters, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee or the certificate administrator to comply with any Requirements, related legal process or appropriate requests (whether formal or informal) may result in, among other things, a forced sale to another investor of such investor’s offered certificates.  In addition, each of the Depositor, the trust fund, the underwriters, the master servicer, the special servicer, the trustee and the certificate administrator intends to comply with the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act, the USA Patriot Act and any other anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism, economic and trade sanctions, and anti-corruption or anti-bribery laws, and regulations of the United States and other countries, and will disclose any information required or requested by authorities in connection therewith.

Potential Forfeiture of Assets

Federal law provides that assets (including property purchased or improved with assets) derived from criminal activity or otherwise tainted, or used in the commission of certain offenses are subject to the blocking requirements of economic sanctions laws and regulations, and can be blocked and/or seized by and ordered forfeited to the United States of America.  The offenses that can trigger such a blocking and/or seizure and forfeiture include, among others, violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, the Bank Secrecy Act, the anti-money-laundering, anti-terrorism, economic sanctions, and anti-bribery laws and regulations, including the USA Patriot Act and the regulations issued pursuant to the USA Patriot Act, as well as the narcotic drug laws.  Under procedures contained in the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, the government may seize the property even before conviction.  The government must publish notice of the forfeiture proceeding and may give notice to all parties “known to have an alleged interest in the property,” including the holders of mortgage loans.

A lender may avoid forfeiture of its interest in the property if it establishes that—

● its mortgage was executed and recorded before commission of the illegal conduct from which the assets used to purchase or improve the property were derived or before the commission of any other crime upon which the forfeiture is based, or

147

● the lender, at the time of execution of the mortgage, “did not know or was reasonably without cause to believe that the property was subject to forfeiture.”

However, there is no assurance that such defense will be successful.

MATERIAL FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

General

This is a general discussion of the anticipated material federal income tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of the offered certificates.  This discussion is directed to certificateholders that hold the offered certificates as capital assets within the meaning of section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code.  It does not discuss all federal income tax consequences that may be relevant to owners of offered certificates, particularly as to investors subject to special treatment under the Internal Revenue Code, including:

● banks,

● insurance companies,

● foreign investors.

● tax exempt investors,

● holders whose “functional currency” is not the United States dollar,

● United States expatriates, and

● holders holding the offered certificates as part of a hedge, straddle, integrated or conversion transaction.

Further, this discussion and any legal opinions referred to in this discussion are based on current provisions and interpretations of the Internal Revenue Code and the accompanying Treasury regulations and on current judicial and administrative rulings.  All of these authorities are subject to change and any change can apply retroactively.  No rulings have been or will be sought from the IRS with respect to any of the federal income tax consequences discussed below.  Accordingly, the IRS may take contrary positions.

Investors should consult their own tax advisers in determining the federal, state, local and any other tax consequences to them of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the offered certificates.

The following discussion addresses securities of two general types:

● REMIC certificates, representing interests in a trust, or a portion of the assets of that trust, as to which a specified person or entity will make a real estate mortgage investment conduit, or REMIC, election under sections 860A through 860G of the Internal Revenue Code; and

● grantor trust certificates, representing interests in a trust, or a portion of the assets of that trust, as to which no REMIC election will be made.

We will indicate in the prospectus supplement for each series of offered certificates whether the related trustee, another party to the related Governing Document or an agent appointed by that trustee or other party will act as tax administrator for the related trust.  If the related tax administrator is required to make a REMIC election,

148

we also will identify in the related prospectus supplement all regular interests and residual interests in the resulting REMIC.

The following discussion is limited to certificates offered under this prospectus.  In addition, this discussion applies only to the extent that the related trust holds only mortgage loans.  If a trust holds assets other than mortgage loans, such as mortgage-backed securities, we will disclose in the related prospectus supplement the tax consequences associated with those other assets being included.  In addition, if agreements other than guaranteed investment contracts are included in a trust to provide interest rate protection for the related offered certificates, the anticipated material tax consequences associated with those agreements also will be discussed in the related prospectus supplement.  See “The Trust Fund—Arrangements Providing Reinvestment, Interest Rate and Currency Related Protection.”

The following discussion is based in part on the rules governing original issue discount in sections 1271-1273 and 1275 of the Internal Revenue Code and in the Treasury regulations issued under those sections.  It is also based in part on the rules governing REMICs in sections 860A-860G of the Internal Revenue Code and in the Treasury regulations issued or proposed under those sections.  The regulations relating to original issue discount do not adequately address all issues relevant to, and in some instances provide that they are not applicable to, securities such as the offered certificates.

REMICs

General.  With respect to each series of offered certificates as to which the related tax administrator will make a REMIC election, our counsel will deliver its opinion generally to the effect that, assuming compliance with all provisions of the related Governing Document, and subject to any other assumptions set forth in the opinion:

● the related trust, or the relevant designated portion of the trust, will qualify as a REMIC, and

● any and all offered certificates representing interests in a REMIC will be either—

1. REMIC regular certificates, representing regular interests in the REMIC, or

2. REMIC residual certificates, representing residual interests in the REMIC.

If an entity electing to be treated as a REMIC fails to comply with the ongoing requirements of the Internal Revenue Code for REMIC status, it may lose its REMIC status.  If so, the entity may become taxable as a corporation.  Therefore, the related certificates may not be given the tax treatment summarized below. Although the Internal Revenue Code authorizes the Treasury Department to issue regulations providing relief in the event of an inadvertent termination of REMIC status, the Treasury Department has not done so.  Any relief mentioned above, moreover, may be accompanied by sanctions.  These sanctions could include the imposition of a corporate tax on all or a portion of a trust’s income for the period in which the requirements for REMIC status are not satisfied.  The Governing Document with respect to each REMIC will include provisions designed to maintain its status as a REMIC under the Internal Revenue Code.

Characterization of Investments in REMIC Certificates.  Unless we state otherwise in the related prospectus supplement, the offered certificates that are REMIC certificates will be treated as—

● “real estate assets” within the meaning of section 856(c)(5)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code in the hands of a real estate investment trust, and in the case of REMIC regular certificates, the interest (including OID) on which, and in the case of REMIC residual certificates, the income allocated with respect thereto, will be considered “interest on obligations secured by mortgages

149

on real property or on interests in real property” within the meaning of section 856(c)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code, and

● “loans secured by an interest in real property” or other assets described in section 7701(a)(19)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code in the hands of a thrift institution,

in the same proportion that the assets of the related REMIC are so treated.

However, to the extent that the REMIC assets constitute mortgage loans on property not used for residential or certain other prescribed purposes, a corresponding portion of the related offered certificates will not be treated as assets qualifying under section 7701(a)(19)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code.  If at all times 95% or more of the assets of the REMIC qualify for any of the foregoing characterizations, the related offered certificates will qualify for the corresponding status in their entirety.

In addition, unless we state otherwise in the related prospectus supplement, offered certificates that are REMIC regular certificates will be “qualified mortgages” within the meaning of section 860G(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code in the hands of another REMIC.  Generally, a “qualified mortgage” for REMIC purposes is any obligation (including certificates of participation in such an obligation) that is principally secured by an interest in real property and that is transferred to the REMIC within a prescribed time period in exchange for regular or residual interests in the REMIC.

The related tax administrator will determine the percentage of the REMIC’s assets that constitute assets described in the above-referenced sections of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to each calendar quarter based on the average adjusted basis of each category of the assets held by the REMIC during that calendar quarter.  The related tax administrator will report those determinations to certificateholders in the manner and at the times required by applicable Treasury regulations.

The assets of the REMIC will include, in addition to mortgage loans—

● collections on mortgage loans held pending payment on the related offered certificates, and

● any property acquired by foreclosure held pending sale, and may include amounts in reserve accounts.

Treasury regulations provide that cash received from collections on mortgage loans held pending distributions to REMIC interest holders is considered part of the mortgage loans for purposes of section 856(c)(5)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code, relating to real estate investment trusts.  It is unclear, however, whether property acquired by foreclosure held pending sale, and amounts in reserve accounts, would be considered to be part of the mortgage loans, or whether these assets otherwise would receive the same treatment as the mortgage loans for purposes of the above-referenced sections of the Internal Revenue Code.  In addition, in some instances, the mortgage loans may not be treated entirely as assets described in those sections of the Internal Revenue Code.  If so, we will describe in the related prospectus supplement those mortgage loans that are characterized differently.

To the extent a REMIC certificate represents ownership of an interest in a mortgage loan that is secured in part by the related borrower’s interest in a bank account, that mortgage loan is not secured solely by real estate.  Accordingly:

● a portion of that certificate may not represent ownership of “loans secured by an interest in real property” or other assets described in section 7701(a)(19)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code;

150

● a portion of that certificate may not represent ownership of “real estate assets” under section 856(c)(5)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code; and

● the interest or other income on that certificate may not constitute “interest on obligations secured by mortgages on real property or on interests in real property” within the meaning of section 856(c)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Tiered REMIC Structures.  For some series of REMIC certificates, the related tax administrator may make two or more REMIC elections as to the related trust for federal income tax purposes.  As to each of these series of REMIC certificates, our counsel will opine -- assuming compliance with all applicable provisions -- that each portion of the related trust as to which a REMIC election is to be made will qualify as a REMIC.  Each of these series will be treated as interests in one REMIC solely for purposes of determining:

● whether the related REMIC certificates will be “real estate assets” within the meaning of section 856(c)(5)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code,

● whether the related REMIC certificates will be “loans secured by an interest in real property” under section 7701(a)(19)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code, and

● whether the interest or other income on the related REMIC certificates is interest described in section 856(c)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates.

General.  Except as otherwise stated in this discussion, the Internal Revenue Code treats REMIC regular certificates as debt instruments issued by the REMIC and not as ownership interests in the REMIC or its assets.  Holders of REMIC regular certificates that otherwise report income under the cash method of accounting must nevertheless report income with respect to REMIC regular certificates under the accrual method.

Original Issue Discount.  Some REMIC regular certificates may be issued with original issue discount within the meaning of section 1273(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.  Any holders of REMIC regular certificates issued with original issue discount generally will have to include original issue discount in income as it accrues, in accordance with a constant yield method, prior to the receipt of the cash attributable to that income.  The Treasury Department has issued regulations under sections 1271 to 1275 of the Internal Revenue Code generally addressing the treatment of debt instruments issued with original issue discount.  Section 1272(a)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code provides special rules applicable to the accrual of original issue discount on, among other instruments, REMIC regular certificates.  The Treasury Department has not issued regulations under that section.  You should be aware, however, that section 1272(a)(6) and the regulations under sections 1271 to 1275 of the Internal Revenue Code do not adequately address all issues relevant to, or are not applicable to, prepayable securities such as the offered certificates.  We recommend that you consult with your own tax advisor concerning the tax treatment of your offered certificates.

The Internal Revenue Code requires, in computing the accrual of original issue discount on REMIC regular certificates, that a reasonable assumption be used concerning the rate at which borrowers will prepay the mortgage loans held by the related REMIC, and prescribe a method for adjusting the amount and rate of accrual of such original issue discount to reflect differences between the prepayment rate actually experienced and the assumed prepayment rate.  The prepayment assumption is to be determined in a manner prescribed in Treasury regulations that the Treasury Department has not yet issued.  The Committee Report indicates that the regulations should provide that the prepayment assumption used with respect to a REMIC regular certificate is determined once, at initial issuance, and must be the same as that used in pricing.  The prepayment assumption used in reporting original issue discount for each series of REMIC regular certificates will be consistent with this standard and will be disclosed in the related prospectus supplement.  However, neither we nor any other person will make

151

any representation that the mortgage loans underlying any series of REMIC regular certificates will in fact prepay at a rate conforming to the prepayment assumption or at any other rate or that the IRS will not challenge on audit the prepayment assumption used.

In general, each REMIC regular certificate will be treated as a single installment obligation issued with an amount of original issue discount equal to the excess of its stated redemption price at maturity over its issue price.

The issue price of a particular class of REMIC regular certificates will be the first cash price at which a substantial amount of those certificates is sold, excluding sales to bond houses, brokers and underwriters.  If less than a substantial amount of a particular class of REMIC regular certificates is sold for cash on or prior to the related date of initial issuance of those certificates, the issue price for that class will be the fair market value of that class on the date of initial issuance.

The stated redemption price at maturity of a REMIC regular certificate is equal to the total of all payments to be made on that certificate other than qualified stated interest.  Generally, qualified stated interest is interest that is unconditionally payable at least annually, during the entire term of the instrument, at a single fixed rate or a variable rate that meets certain requirements set out in the OID regulations (as described below).

Because there is no penalty or default remedy in the case of nonpayment of interest with respect to a REMIC regular certificate, it is possible that no interest on any class of REMIC regular certificates will be treated as qualified stated interest. However, except as provided in the following three sentences or in the related prospectus supplement, because the underlying mortgage loans provide for remedies in the event of default, it is anticipated that the trustee will treat interest with respect to the REMIC regular certificates as qualified stated interest. Distributions of interest on an accrual certificate, or on other REMIC regular certificates with respect to which deferred interest will accrue, will not constitute qualified stated interest, in which case the stated redemption price at maturity of the REMIC regular certificates includes all distributions of interest as well as principal on the REMIC regular certificates. Likewise, it is anticipated that the trustee will treat an “interest-only” class, or a class on which interest is substantially disproportionate to its principal amount (a so called “super-premium” class) as having no qualified stated interest.

Certain classes of REMIC regular certificates may provide for the accrual of deferred interest (i.e., interest deferred by reason of negative amortization) attributable to one or more adjustable rate mortgage loans.  Any deferred interest that accrues with respect to a class of REMIC regular certificates will constitute income to the holders of such certificates prior to the time payments of cash with respect to such deferred interest are made.  It is unclear, under the OID regulations, whether any of the interest on such certificates will constitute qualified stated interest or whether all or a portion of the interest payable on such certificates must be included in the stated redemption price at maturity of the certificates and accounted for as OID (which could accelerate such inclusion).  Interest on REMIC regular certificates must in any event be accounted for under an accrual method by the holders of such certificates and, therefore, applying the latter analysis may result only in a slight difference in the timing of the inclusion in income of interest on such REMIC regular certificates.

As described above, REMIC regular certificates may provide for interest based on a variable rate. Under the OID regulations, interest is treated as payable at a variable rate if, generally, (i) the issue price does not exceed the original principal balance by more than a specified amount and (ii) the interest compounds or is payable at least annually at current values of (a) one or more “qualified floating rates”, (b) a single fixed rate and one or more qualified floating rates, (c) a single “objective rate”, or (d) a single fixed rate and a single objective rate that is a “qualified inverse floating rate”. A floating rate is a qualified floating rate if variations in the rate can reasonably be expected to measure contemporaneous variations in the cost of newly borrowed funds, where the rate is subject to a fixed multiple that is greater than 0.65 but not more than 1.35. The rate may also be increased or decreased by a fixed spread or subject to a fixed cap or floor, or a cap or floor that is not reasonably expected as of the issue date to affect the yield of the instrument significantly. An objective rate is any rate (other than a qualified floating rate) that is determined using a single fixed formula and that is based on objective financial or

152

economic information, provided that the information is not (i) within the control of the issuer or a related party or (ii) unique to the circumstances of the issuer or a related party. A qualified inverse floating rate is a rate equal to a fixed rate minus a qualified floating rate that inversely reflects contemporaneous variations in the cost of newly borrowed funds; an inverse floating rate that is not a qualified inverse floating rate may nevertheless be an objective rate. A class of REMIC regular certificates may be issued under this prospectus that provides for interest that is not a fixed rate and also does not have a variable rate under the foregoing rules, for example, a class that bears different rates at different times during the period it is outstanding so that it is considered significantly “front loaded” or “back loaded” within the meaning of the OID regulations. It is possible that this class may be considered to bear “contingent interest” within the meaning of the OID regulations. The OID regulations, as they relate to the treatment of contingent interest, are by their terms not applicable to REMIC regular certificates. However, if final regulations dealing with contingent interest with respect to REMIC regular certificates apply the same principles as existing contingent rules, the regulations may lead to different timing of income inclusion that would be the case under the OID regulations. Furthermore, application of these principles could lead to the characterization of gain on the sale of contingent interest REMIC regular certificates as ordinary income. Investors should consult their tax advisors regarding the appropriate treatment of any REMIC regular certificate that does not pay interest at a fixed rate or variable rate as described in this paragraph.

Under Treasury regulations, a REMIC regular certificate (i) bearing a rate that is tied to current values of a rate that qualifies as a variable rate under the OID regulations (or the highest, lowest or average of two or more variable rates, including a rate based on the average cost of funds of one or more financial institutions), or a positive or negative multiple of this rate (plus or minus a specified number of basis points), or that represents a weighted average of rates on some or all of the mortgage loans, including a rate that is subject to one or more caps or floors, or (ii) bearing one or more variable rates for one or more periods or one or more fixed rates for one or more periods, and a different variable rate or fixed rate for other periods, qualifies as a regular interest in a REMIC. It is anticipated that the trustee will treat REMIC regular certificates that qualify as regular interests under this rule in the same manner as obligations bearing a variable rate for original issue discount reporting purposes.

The amount of original issue discount with respect to a REMIC regular certificate bearing a variable rate of interest will accrue in the manner described below with the yield to maturity and future payments on the REMIC regular certificate generally to be determined by assuming that interest will be payable for the life of the REMIC regular certificate based on the initial rate (or, if different, the value of the applicable variable rate as of the pricing date) for the relevant class. It is anticipated that the trustee will treat the variable interest as qualified stated interest, other than variable interest on an interest-only or super-premium class, which will be treated as non-qualified stated interest includible in the stated redemption price at maturity. Ordinary income reportable for any period will be adjusted based on subsequent changes in the applicable interest rate index.

Although unclear under the OID regulations, it is anticipated that the trustee will treat REMIC regular certificates  bearing an interest rate that is a weighted average of the net interest rates on mortgage loans which themselves have fixed or qualified variable rates, as having qualified stated interest. In the case of adjustable rate mortgage loans, the applicable index used to compute interest on the mortgage loans in effect on the pricing date (or possibly the issue date) will be deemed to be in effect over the life of the mortgage loans beginning with the period in which the first weighted average adjustment date occurring after the issue date occurs. Adjustments will be made in each accrual period either increasing or decreasing the amount or ordinary income reportable to reflect the interest rate on the REMIC regular certificates.

Some classes of REMIC regular certificates may provide that the first interest payment with respect to those certificates be made more than one month after the date of initial issuance, a period that is longer than the subsequent monthly intervals between interest payments.  Assuming the accrual period for original issue discount is the monthly period that begins on each distribution date, then, as a result of this long first accrual period, some or all interest payments may be required to be included in the stated redemption price of the REMIC regular certificate and accounted for as original issue discount.  Because interest on REMIC regular certificates must in

153

any event be accounted for under an accrual method, applying this analysis would result in only a slight difference in the timing of the inclusion in income of the yield on the REMIC regular certificates.

In addition, if the accrued interest to be paid on the first distribution date is computed with respect to a period that begins prior to the date of initial issuance, a portion of the purchase price paid for a REMIC regular certificate will reflect that accrued interest.  In those cases, information returns provided to the certificateholders and the IRS will be based on the position that the portion of the purchase price paid for the interest accrued prior to the date of initial issuance is treated as part of the overall cost of the REMIC regular certificate.  Therefore, the portion of the interest paid on the first distribution date in excess of interest accrued from the date of initial issuance to the first distribution date is included in the stated redemption price of the REMIC regular certificate.  However, the Treasury regulations state that all or some portion of this accrued interest may be treated as a separate asset, the cost of which is recovered entirely out of interest paid on the first distribution date.  It is unclear how an election to do so would be made under these regulations and whether this election could be made unilaterally by a certificateholder.

Notwithstanding the general definition of original issue discount, original issue discount on a REMIC regular certificate will be considered to be de minimis if it is less than 0.25% of the stated redemption price of the certificate multiplied by its weighted average maturity.  For this purpose, the weighted average maturity of a REMIC regular certificate is computed as the sum of the amounts determined, as to each payment included in the stated redemption price of the certificate, by multiplying:

● the number of complete years, rounding down for partial years, from the date of initial issuance, until that payment is expected to be made, presumably taking into account the prepayment assumption, by

● a fraction—

1. the numerator of which is the amount of the payment, and

2. the denominator of which is the stated redemption price at maturity of the certificate.

Original issue discount of only a de minimis amount, other than de minimis original issue discount attributable to a so-called “teaser” interest rate or an initial interest holiday, will be included in income as each payment of stated principal is made, based on the product of:

● the total amount of the de minimis original issue discount, and

● a fraction—

1. the numerator of which is the amount of the principal payment, and

2. the denominator of which is the outstanding stated principal amount of the subject REMIC regular certificate.

You may alternatively elect to accrue de minimis original issue discount into income currently based on a constant yield method.  See “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Market Discount” below for a description of that election under the applicable Treasury regulations.

If original issue discount on a REMIC regular certificate is in excess of a de minimis amount, the holder of the certificate must include in ordinary gross income the sum of the daily portions of original issue discount for each day during its taxable year on which it held the certificate, including the purchase date but excluding the

154

disposition date.  In the case of an original holder of a REMIC regular certificate, the daily portions of original issue discount will be determined as described below in this “—Original Issue Discount” subsection.

As to each accrual period, the related tax administrator will calculate the original issue discount that accrued during that accrual period.  For these purposes, an accrual period is, unless we otherwise state in the related prospectus supplement, the period that begins on a date that corresponds to a distribution date, or in the case of the first accrual period, begins on the date of initial issuance, and ends on the day preceding the next following distribution date.  The portion of original issue discount that accrues in any accrual period will equal the excess, if any, of:

● the sum of:

1. the present value, as of the end of the accrual period (determined by using as a discount factor the original yield to maturity of the REMIC regular certificate as calculated taking into account the prepayment assumption), of all of the payments remaining to be made on the subject REMIC regular certificate, if any, in future periods, taking into account the prepayment assumption, and

2. the payments made on that certificate during the accrual period of amounts included in the stated redemption price, over

● the adjusted issue price of the subject REMIC regular certificate at the beginning of the accrual period.

The adjusted issue price of a REMIC regular certificate is:

● the issue price of the certificate, increased by

● the total amount of original issue discount previously accrued on the certificate, reduced by

● the amount of all prior payments of amounts included in its stated redemption price.

The original issue discount accruing during any accrual period, computed as described above, will be allocated ratably to each day during the accrual period to determine the daily portion of original issue discount for that day.

The OID regulations suggest that original issue discount with respect to certificates that represent multiple uncertificated REMIC regular interests, in which ownership interests will be issued simultaneously to the same buyer and which may be required under the related Governing Document to be transferred together, should be computed on an aggregate method.  In the absence of further guidance from the IRS, original issue discount with respect to certificates that represent the ownership of multiple uncertificated REMIC regular interests will be reported to the IRS and the certificateholders on an aggregate method based on a single overall constant yield and the prepayment assumption stated in the accompanying prospectus supplement, treating all uncertificated regular interests as a single debt instrument as described in the OID regulations, so long as the related Governing Document requires that the uncertificated regular interests be transferred together.

A subsequent purchaser of a REMIC regular certificate that purchases the certificate at a cost, excluding any portion of that cost attributable to accrued qualified stated interest, that is less than its remaining stated redemption price will also be required to include in gross income the daily portions of any original issue discount with respect to the certificate.  However, if the cost is in excess of its adjusted issue price, the daily portion will be reduced in proportion to the ratio that the excess bears to the total original issue discount remaining to be accrued

155

on the certificate.  The adjusted issue price of a REMIC regular certificate, as of any date of determination, equals the sum of:

● the adjusted issue price or, in the case of the first accrual period, the issue price, of the certificate at the beginning of the accrual period which includes that date of determination, and

● the daily portions of original issue discount for all days during that accrual period prior to that date of determination,

less any amounts included in its stated redemption price paid during the accrual period prior to that date of determination.

If the foregoing method for computing original issue discount results in a negative amount of original issue discount as to any accrual period with respect to a REMIC regular certificate held by you, the amount of original issue discount accrued for that accrual period will be zero.  You may not deduct the negative amount currently.  Instead, you will only be permitted to offset it against future positive original issue discount, if any, attributable to the certificate.  Although not free from doubt, it is possible that you may be permitted to recognize a loss to the extent your basis in the certificate exceeds the maximum amount of payments that you could ever receive with respect to the certificate.  However, the loss may be a capital loss, which is limited in its deductibility.  The foregoing considerations are particularly relevant to certificates that have no, or a disproportionately small, amount of principal because they can have negative yields if the mortgage loans held by the related REMIC prepay more quickly than anticipated.  See “Risk Factors—The Investment Performance of Your Offered Certificate Will Depend Upon Payments, Defaults and Losses on the Underlying Mortgage Loans; and Those Payments, Defaults and Losses May Be Highly Unpredictable.”

The Treasury regulations in some circumstances permit the holder of a debt instrument to recognize original issue discount under a method that differs from that used by the issuer.  Accordingly, it is possible that you may be able to select a method for recognizing original issue discount that differs from that used by the related tax administrator in preparing reports to you and the IRS.  Prospective purchasers of the REMIC regular certificates are encouraged to consult their tax advisors concerning the tax treatment of these certificates in this regard.

Proposed regulations concerning the accrual of interest income by the holders of REMIC regular interests would create a special rule for accruing original issue discount on REMIC regular certificates that provide for a delay between record and distribution dates, such that the period over which original issue discount accrues coincides with the period over which the certificate holder’s right to interest payment accrues under the governing contract provisions rather than over the period between distribution dates.  If the proposed regulations are adopted in the same form as proposed, certificate holders would be required to accrue interest from the issue date to the first record date, but would not be required to accrue interest after the last record date.  The proposed regulations are limited to REMIC regular certificates with delayed payment periods of fewer than 32 days.  The proposed regulations are proposed to apply to any REMIC regular certificate issued after the date the final regulations are published in the Federal Register. The proposed regulations provide automatic consent for the holder of a REMIC regular certificate to change its method of accounting for original issue discount under the final regulations. The change is proposed to be made on a cut-off basis and, thus, does not affect REMIC regular certificates before the date the final regulations are published in the Federal Register.

The Treasury Department issued a notice of proposed rulemaking on the timing of income and deductions attributable to interest-only regular interests in a REMIC, in which the Treasury Department and the IRS requested comments on whether to adopt special rules for taxing regular interests in a REMIC that are entitled only to a specified portion of the interest in respect of one or more mortgage loans held by the REMIC (“REMIC IOs”), high-yield REMIC regular interests, and apparent negative-yield instruments.  The Treasury Department and the IRS also requested comments on different methods for taxing the foregoing instruments, including the

156

possible recognition of negative amounts of original issue discount, the formulation of special guidelines for the application of section 166 of the Internal Revenue Code to REMIC IOs and similar instruments, and the adoption of a new alternative method applicable to REMIC IOs and similar instruments.  It is uncertain whether IRS actually will propose any regulations as a consequence of the solicitation of comments and when any resulting new rules would be effective.

Market Discount.  You will be considered to have purchased a REMIC regular certificate at a market discount if—

● in the case of a certificate issued without original issue discount, you purchased the certificate at a price less than its remaining stated principal amount, or

● in the case of a certificate issued with original issue discount, you purchased the certificate at a price less than its adjusted issue price.

If you purchase a REMIC regular certificate with more than a de minimis amount of market discount, you will recognize gain upon receipt of each payment representing stated redemption price.  Under section 1276 of the Internal Revenue Code, you generally will be required to allocate the portion of each payment representing some or all of the stated redemption price first to accrued market discount not previously included in income and must recognize as ordinary income the amount so allocated.  You may elect to include market discount in income currently as it accrues rather than including it on a deferred basis in accordance with the foregoing.  If made, this election will apply to all market discount bonds acquired by you on or after the first day of the first taxable year to which this election applies.

You may elect to accrue all interest and discount, including de minimis market or original issue discount, in income as interest, and to amortize premium, based on a constant yield method.  Your making this election with respect to a REMIC regular certificate with market discount would be deemed to be an election to include currently market discount in income with respect to all other debt instruments with market discount that you acquire during the taxable year of the election or thereafter, and possibly previously acquired instruments.  Similarly, your making this election as to a certificate acquired at a premium would be deemed to be an election to amortize bond premium, with respect to all debt instruments having amortizable bond premium that you own or acquire.  See “—REMICs —Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Premium” below.

Each of the elections described above to accrue interest and discount, and to amortize premium, with respect to a certificate on a constant yield method or as interest would be irrevocable except with the approval of the IRS.

Market discount with respect to a REMIC regular certificate will be considered to be de minimis if the market discount is less than 0.25% of the remaining stated redemption price of the certificate multiplied by the number of complete years to maturity remaining after the date of its purchase.  In interpreting a similar rule with respect to original issue discount on obligations payable in installments, the Treasury regulations refer to the weighted average maturity of obligations.  It is likely that the same rule will be applied with respect to market discount, presumably taking into account the prepayment assumption.  If market discount is treated as de minimis under this rule, it appears that the actual discount would be treated in a manner similar to original issue discount of a de minimis amount.  See “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Original Issue Discount” above.  This treatment would result in discount being included in income at a slower rate than discount would be required to be included in income using the method described above.

Section 1276(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code specifically authorizes the Treasury Department to issue regulations providing for the method for accruing market discount on debt instruments, the principal of which is payable in more than one installment.  Until regulations are issued by the Treasury Department, the relevant rules

157

described in the Committee Report apply.  The Committee Report indicates that in each accrual period, you may accrue  market discount on a REMIC regular certificate held by you, at your option:

● on the basis of a constant yield method,

● in the case of a certificate issued without original issue discount, in an amount that bears the same ratio to the total remaining market discount as the stated interest paid in the accrual period bears to the total amount of stated interest remaining to be paid on the certificate as of the beginning of the accrual period, or

● in the case of a certificate issued with original issue discount, in an amount that bears the same ratio to the total remaining market discount as the original issue discount accrued in the accrual period bears to the total amount of original issue discount remaining on the certificate at the beginning of the accrual period.

The prepayment assumption used in calculating the accrual of original issue discount is also used in calculating the accrual of market discount.  Because the regulations referred to in this paragraph have not been issued, it is not possible to predict what effect those regulations might have on the tax treatment of a REMIC regular certificate purchased at a discount in the secondary market.

To the extent that REMIC regular certificates provide for monthly or other periodic payments throughout their term, the effect of these rules may be to require market discount to be includible in income at a rate that is not significantly slower than the rate at which the discount would accrue if it were original issue discount.  Moreover, in any event a holder of a REMIC regular certificate generally will be required to treat a portion of any gain on the sale or exchange of the certificate as ordinary income to the extent of the market discount accrued to the date of disposition under one of the foregoing methods, less any accrued market discount previously reported as ordinary income.

Further, you may be required to defer a portion of your interest deductions for the taxable year attributable to any indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry a REMIC regular certificate purchased with market discount.  For these purposes, the de minimis rule referred to above applies.  Any deferred interest expense would not exceed the market discount that accrues during the related taxable year and is, in general, allowed as a deduction not later than the year in which the related market discount is includible in income.  If you have elected, however, to include market discount in income currently as it accrues, the interest deferral rule described above would not apply.

Premium.  A REMIC regular certificate purchased at a cost, excluding any portion of the cost attributable to accrued qualified stated interest, that is greater than its remaining stated redemption price will be considered to be purchased at a premium.  You may elect under section 171 of the Internal Revenue Code to amortize the premium over the life of the certificate.  If you elect to amortize bond premium, bond premium would be amortized on a constant yield method and would be applied as an offset against qualified stated interest.  If made, this election will apply to all debt instruments having amortizable bond premium that you own or subsequently acquire.  The IRS has issued regulations on the amortization of bond premium, but they specifically do not apply to holders of REMIC regular certificates.

Treasury regulations also permit you to elect to include all interest and discount in income, and to amortize premium, based on a constant yield method, further treating you as having made the election to amortize premium generally.  See “—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Market Discount” above.  The Committee Report states that the same rules that apply to accrual of market discount and require the use of a prepayment assumption in accruing market discount with respect to REMIC regular certificates without regard to whether those certificates have original issue discount, will also apply in amortizing bond premium under section 171 of the Internal Revenue Code.

158

Whether you will be treated as holding a REMIC regular certificate with amortizable bond premium will depend on—

● the purchase price paid for your offered certificate, and

● the payments remaining to be made on your offered certificate at the time of its acquisition by you.

If you acquire an interest in any class of REMIC regular certificates issued at a premium, you are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor regarding the possibility of making an election to amortize the premium.

Realized Losses.  Under section 166 of the Internal Revenue Code, although not entirely clear, if you are either a corporate holder of a REMIC regular certificate or a noncorporate holder of a REMIC regular certificate that acquires the certificate in connection with a trade or business, you should be allowed to deduct, as ordinary losses, any losses sustained during a taxable year in which your offered certificate becomes wholly or partially worthless as the result of one or more realized losses on the related mortgage loans.  However, if you are a noncorporate holder that does not acquire a REMIC regular certificate in connection with a trade or business, it appears that—

● you will not be entitled to deduct a loss under section 166 of the Internal Revenue Code until your offered certificate becomes wholly worthless, which is when its principal balance has been reduced to zero, and

● the loss will be characterized as a short-term capital loss.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is not clear whether holders of interest-only REMIC regular certificates are entitled to any deduction under section 166 of the Internal Revenue Code for bad debt loss.  Certificateholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the appropriate timing, amount and character of any loss sustained with respect to such REMIC regular certificates.

You will also have to accrue interest and original issue discount with respect to your REMIC regular certificate, without giving effect to any reductions in payments attributable to defaults or delinquencies on the related mortgage loans, until it can be established that those payment reductions are not recoverable.  In this regard, investors are cautioned that while they may generally cease to accrue interest income if it reasonably appears that the interest will be uncollectible, the IRS may take the position that original issue discount must continue to be accrued in spite of its uncollectibility until the REMIC regular certificate is disposed of in a taxable transaction or becomes worthless.   As a result, your taxable income in a period could exceed your economic income in that period.  If any of those amounts previously included in taxable income are not ultimately received due to a loss on the related mortgage loans, you should be able to recognize a loss or reduction in income.  However, the law is unclear with respect to the timing and character of this loss or reduction in income.

Taxation of Owners of REMIC Residual Certificates.

General.  Although a REMIC is a separate entity for federal income tax purposes, the Internal Revenue Code does not subject a REMIC to entity-level taxation, except with regard to prohibited transactions and the other transactions described under “—REMICs—Prohibited Transactions Tax and Other Taxes” below.  Rather, a holder of REMIC residual certificates must generally include in income the taxable income or net loss of the related REMIC.  Accordingly, the Internal Revenue Code treats the REMIC residual certificates much differently than it would if they represented direct ownership interests in the related mortgage loans or debt instruments issued by the related REMIC.

159

Holders of REMIC residual certificates generally will be required to report their daily portion of the taxable income or, subject to the limitations noted in this discussion, the net loss of the related REMIC for each day during a calendar quarter that they own those certificates.  For this purpose, the taxable income or net loss of the REMIC will be allocated to each day in the calendar quarter ratably using a “30 days per month/90 days per quarter/360 days per year” convention unless we otherwise disclose in the related prospectus supplement.  These daily amounts then will be allocated among the holders of the REMIC residual certificates in proportion to their respective ownership interests on that day.  Any amount included in the residual certificateholders’ gross income or allowed as a loss to them by virtue of this allocation will be treated as ordinary income or loss.  The taxable income of the REMIC will be determined under the rules described below in “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Residual Certificates—Taxable Income of the REMIC.”  Holders of REMIC residual certificates must report the taxable income of the related REMIC without regard to the timing or amount of cash payments by the REMIC until the REMIC’s termination.  Income derived from the REMIC residual certificates will be “portfolio income” for the purposes of the limitations under section 469 of the Internal Revenue Code on the deductibility of “passive losses.”

A holder of a REMIC residual certificate that purchased the certificate from a prior holder also will be required to report on its federal income tax return amounts representing its daily share of the taxable income, or net loss, of the related REMIC for each day that it holds the REMIC residual certificate.  These daily amounts generally will equal the amounts of taxable income or net loss determined as described above.  The Committee Report indicates that modifications of the general rules may be made, by regulations, legislation or otherwise, to reduce, or increase, the income of a holder of a REMIC residual certificate.  These modifications would occur when a holder purchases the REMIC residual certificate from a prior holder at a price other than the adjusted basis that the REMIC residual certificate would have had in the hands of an original holder of that certificate.  The Treasury regulations, however, do not provide for these modifications.

Any payments that you receive from the seller of a REMIC residual certificate in connection with the acquisition of that certificate will be income to you.

Treasury regulations addressing the federal income tax treatment of “inducement fees” received by transferees of noneconomic REMIC residual interests require inducement fees to be included in income over a period reasonably related to the period in which the related REMIC residual interest is expected to generate taxable income or net loss to its holder.  These regulations provide two safe harbor methods which permit transferees to include inducement fees in income, either (a) in the same amounts and over the same period that the taxpayer uses for financial reporting purposes, provided that such period is not shorter than the period the REMIC is expected to generate taxable income or (b) ratably over the remaining anticipated weighted average life of all the regular and residual interests issued by the REMIC, determined based on actual distributions projected as remaining to be made on such interests under the prepayment assumption.  If the holder of a REMIC residual interest sells or otherwise disposes of the residual certificate, any unrecognized portion of the inducement fee must be taken into account at the time of the sale or disposition.  These regulations also provide that an inducement fee shall be treated as income from sources within the United States.  In addition, the IRS has issued administrative guidance addressing the procedures by which transferees of noneconomic REMIC residual interests may obtain automatic consent from the IRS to change the method of accounting for REMIC inducement fee income to one of the safe harbor methods provided in these regulations (including a change from one safe harbor method to the other safe harbor method).  Prospective purchasers of the REMIC residual certificates are encouraged to consult with their tax advisors regarding the effect of these regulations and the related guidance regarding the procedures for obtaining automatic consent to change the method of accounting.

160

Tax liability with respect to the amount of income that holders of REMIC residual certificates will be required to report, will often exceed the amount of cash payments received from the related REMIC for the corresponding period.  Consequently, you should have—

● other sources of funds sufficient to pay any federal income taxes due as a result of your ownership of REMIC residual certificates, or

● unrelated deductions against which income may be offset.

See, however, the rules discussed below relating to:

● excess inclusions,

● residual interests without significant value, and

● noneconomic residual interests.

The fact that the tax liability associated with this income allocated to you may exceed the cash payments received by you for the corresponding period may significantly and adversely affect their after-tax rate of return.  This disparity between income and payments may not be offset by corresponding losses or reductions of income attributable to your REMIC residual certificates until subsequent tax years.  Even then, the extra income may not be completely offset due to changes in the Internal Revenue Code, tax rates or character of the income or loss.  Therefore, REMIC residual certificates will ordinarily have a negative value at the time of issuance.  See “Risk Factors—Residual Interests in a Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit Have Adverse Tax Consequences.”

Taxable Income of the REMIC.  The taxable income of a REMIC will equal:

● the income from the mortgage loans and other assets of the REMIC; plus

● any cancellation of indebtedness income due to the allocation of realized losses to those REMIC certificates constituting regular interests in the REMIC; less the following items—

1. the deductions allowed to the REMIC for interest, including original issue discount but reduced by any premium on issuance, on any class of REMIC certificates constituting regular interests in the REMIC, whether offered or not,

2. amortization of any premium on the mortgage loans held by the REMIC,

3. bad debt losses with respect to the mortgage loans held by the REMIC, and

4. except as described below in this “—Taxable Income of the REMIC” subsection, servicing, administrative and other expenses.

For purposes of determining its taxable income, a REMIC will have an initial aggregate basis in its assets equal to the sum of the issue prices of all REMIC certificates, or in the case of REMIC certificates not sold initially, their fair market values.  The aggregate basis will be allocated among the mortgage loans and the other assets of the REMIC in proportion to their respective fair market values.  The issue price of any REMIC certificates offered hereby will be determined in the manner described above under “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Original Issue Discount.”  The issue price of a REMIC certificate received in exchange for an interest in mortgage loans or other property will equal the fair market value of the interests in the mortgage loans or other property.  Accordingly, if one or more classes of REMIC certificates are retained initially rather than sold, the related tax administrator may be required to estimate the fair market value of these interests in order to determine the basis of the REMIC in the mortgage loans and other property held by the REMIC.

161

The amount and method of accrual by a REMIC of original issue discount income and market discount income with respect to mortgage loans that it holds will be equivalent to the method for accruing original issue discount income for holders of REMIC regular certificates, except that the 0.25% per annum de minimis rule and adjustments for subsequent holders described above will not apply.  That method is a constant yield method taking into account the prepayment assumption.  However, a REMIC that acquires loans at a market discount must include that market discount in income currently, as it accrues, on a constant yield basis.  See “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates” above, which describes a method for accruing the discount income that is analogous to that required to be used by a REMIC as to mortgage loans with market discount that it holds.

A REMIC will acquire a mortgage loan with discount, or premium, to the extent that the REMIC’s basis, determined as described in the second preceding paragraph, is different from its stated redemption price.  Discount will be includible in the income of the REMIC as it accrues, in advance of receipt of the cash attributable to that income, under a method similar to the method described above for accruing original issue discount on the REMIC regular certificates.  A REMIC may elect under section 171 of the Internal Revenue Code to amortize any premium on the mortgage loans that it holds.  Premium on any mortgage loan to which this election applies may be amortized under a constant yield method, presumably taking into account the prepayment assumption.

A REMIC will be allowed deductions for interest, including original issue discount, on all of the certificates that constitute regular interests in the REMIC, whether or not offered hereby, as if those certificates were indebtedness of the REMIC.  Original issue discount will be considered to accrue for this purpose as described above under “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Original Issue Discount.”  However, the de minimis rule described in that section will not apply in determining deductions.

If a class of REMIC regular certificates is issued at a price in excess of the stated redemption price of that class, the net amount of interest deductions that are allowed to the REMIC in each taxable year with respect to those certificates will be reduced by an amount equal to the portion of that excess that is considered to be amortized in that year.  It appears that this excess should be amortized under a constant yield method in a manner analogous to the method of accruing original issue discount described above under “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Original Issue Discount.”

As a general rule, the taxable income of a REMIC will be determined as if the REMIC were an individual having the calendar year as its taxable year and using the accrual method of accounting.  However, no item of income, gain, loss or deduction allocable to a prohibited transaction will be taken into account.  See “—REMICs—Prohibited Transactions Tax and Other Taxes” below.  Further, the limitation on miscellaneous itemized deductions imposed on individuals by section 67 of the Internal Revenue Code will not be applied at the REMIC level so that the REMIC will be allowed full deductions for servicing, administrative and other non-interest expenses in determining its taxable income.  All those expenses will be allocated as a separate item to the holders of the related REMIC certificates, subject to the limitation of section 67 of the Internal Revenue Code.  See “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Residual Certificates—Pass-Through of Miscellaneous Itemized Deductions” below.  If the deductions allowed to the REMIC exceed its gross income for a calendar quarter, the excess will be the net loss for the REMIC for that calendar quarter.

Basis Rules, Net Losses and Distributions.  The adjusted basis of a REMIC residual certificate will be equal to:

● the amount paid for that REMIC residual certificate,

● increased by amounts included in the income of the holder of that REMIC residual certificate, and

162

● decreased, but not below zero, by payments made, and by net losses allocated, to the holder of that REMIC residual certificate.

A holder of a REMIC residual certificate is not allowed to take into account any net loss for any calendar quarter to the extent that the net loss exceeds the adjusted basis to that holder as of the close of that calendar quarter, determined without regard to that net loss.  Any loss that is not currently deductible by reason of this limitation may be carried forward indefinitely to future calendar quarters and, subject to the same limitation, may be used only to offset income from the REMIC residual certificate.  The ability of REMIC residual certificateholders to deduct net losses may be subject to additional limitations under the Internal Revenue Code, as to which the certificateholders are encouraged to consult their tax advisors.

Any distribution on a REMIC residual certificate will be treated as a nontaxable return of capital to the extent it does not exceed the holder’s adjusted basis in the REMIC residual certificate.  To the extent a distribution on a REMIC residual certificate exceeds the holder’s adjusted basis, it will be treated as gain from the sale of that REMIC residual certificate.

As described above, a holder’s basis in a REMIC residual certificate will initially equal the amount paid for the certificate and will be increased by that holder’s allocable share of taxable income of the related REMIC.  However, these increases in basis may not occur until the end of the calendar quarter, or perhaps the end of the calendar year, with respect to which the related REMIC’s taxable income is allocated to that holder.  To the extent the initial basis of the holder of a REMIC residual certificate is less than the payments to that holder, and increases in the initial basis either occur after these payments or, together with the initial basis, are less than the amount of these payments, gain will be recognized to that holder on these payments.  This gain will be treated as gain from the sale of its REMIC residual certificate.

The effect of these rules is that a holder of a REMIC residual certificate may not amortize its basis in a REMIC residual certificate, but may only recover its basis:

● through distributions,

● through the deduction of any net losses of the REMIC, or

● upon the sale of its REMIC residual certificate.

See “—REMICs—Sales of REMIC Certificates” below.

For a discussion of possible modifications of these rules that may require adjustments to income of a holder of a REMIC residual certificate other than an original holder see “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Residual Certificates—General” above.  These adjustments could require a holder of a REMIC residual certificate to account for any difference between the cost of the certificate to the holder and the adjusted basis the certificate would have had in the hands of an original holder.

Excess Inclusions.  Any excess inclusions with respect to a REMIC residual certificate will be subject to federal income tax in all events.  In general, the excess inclusions with respect to a REMIC residual certificate for any calendar quarter will be the excess, if any, of:

● the sum of the daily portions of REMIC taxable income allocable to that certificate, over

● the sum of the daily accruals for each day during the quarter that the certificate was held by that holder.

163

The daily accruals of a holder of a REMIC residual certificate will be determined by allocating to each day during a calendar quarter its ratable portion of a numerical calculation.  That calculation is the product of the adjusted issue price of the REMIC residual certificate at the beginning of the calendar quarter and 120% of the long-term Federal rate in effect on the date of initial issuance.  For this purpose, the adjusted issue price of a REMIC residual certificate as of the beginning of any calendar quarter will be equal to:

● the issue price of the certificate, increased by

● the sum of the daily accruals for all prior quarters, and decreased, but not below zero, by

● any payments made with respect to the certificate before the beginning of that quarter.

The issue price of a REMIC residual certificate is the initial offering price to the public at which a substantial amount of the REMIC residual certificates were sold, but excluding sales to bond houses, brokers and underwriters or, if no sales have been made, its initial fair market value.  The long-term Federal rate is an average of current yields on Treasury securities with a remaining term of greater than nine years, computed and published monthly by the IRS.

Although it has not done so, the Treasury Department has authority to issue regulations that would treat the entire amount of income accruing on a REMIC residual certificate as excess inclusions if the REMIC residual interest evidenced by that certificate is considered not to have significant value.

For holders of REMIC residual certificates, excess inclusions:

● will not be permitted to be offset by deductions, losses or loss carryovers from other activities,

● will be treated as unrelated business taxable income to an otherwise tax-exempt organization, and

● will not be eligible for any rate reduction or exemption under any applicable tax treaty with respect to the 30% United States withholding tax imposed on payments to holders of REMIC residual certificates that are foreign investors.

See, however, “—REMICs—Foreign Investors in REMIC Certificates” below.

Furthermore, for purposes of the alternative minimum tax:

● excess inclusions will not be permitted to be offset by the alternative tax net operating loss deduction, and

● alternative minimum taxable income may not be less than the taxpayer’s excess inclusions; provided, however, that for purposes of this clause, alternative minimum taxable income is determined without regard to the special rule that taxable income cannot be less than excess inclusions.

This last rule has the effect of preventing non-refundable tax credits from reducing the taxpayer’s income tax to an amount lower than the alternative minimum tax on excess inclusions.

In the case of any REMIC residual certificates held by a real estate investment trust, or REIT, the total excess inclusions with respect to these REMIC residual certificates will be allocated among the shareholders of the REIT in proportion to the dividends received by the shareholders from the REIT.  Any amount so allocated will be treated as an excess inclusion with respect to a REMIC residual certificate as if held directly by the shareholder.  The total excess inclusions referred to in the previous sentence will be reduced, but not below zero,

164

by any REIT taxable income, within the meaning of section 857(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code, other than any net capital gain.  Treasury regulations yet to be issued could apply a similar rule to:

● regulated investment companies,

● common trusts, and

● some cooperatives.

Applicable Treasury regulations modify the general rule that excess inclusions from a REMIC residual interest are not includible in the income of a nonresident alien individual or foreign corporation for purposes of the 30% United States withholding tax until paid or distributed or when the REMIC residual interest is disposed of. These Treasury regulations accelerate the time both for reporting of, and withholding tax on, excess inclusions allocated to the foreign equity holders of domestic partnerships and certain other pass-through entities. These Treasury regulations also provide that excess inclusions are United States sourced income.

Under these Treasury regulations, in the case of REMIC residual interests held by a foreign person through a domestic partnership, the amount of excess inclusion income allocated to the foreign partner is deemed to be received by the foreign partner on the last day of the partnership’s taxable year except to the extent that the excess inclusion was required to be taken into account by the foreign partner at an earlier time under section 860G(b) of the Internal Revenue Code as a result of a distribution by the partnership to the foreign partner or a disposition in whole or in part of the foreign partner’s indirect interest in the REMIC residual interest. A disposition in whole or in part of the foreign partner’s indirect interest in the REMIC residual interest may occur as a result of a termination of the REMIC, a disposition of the partnership’s residual interest in the REMIC, a disposition of the foreign partner’s interest in the partnership, or any other reduction in the foreign partner’s allocable share of the portion of the REMIC net income or deduction allocated to the partnership.

Similarly, in the case of a residual interest held by a foreign person indirectly as a shareholder of a real estate investment trust or regulated investment company, as a participant in a common trust fund or as a patron in an organization subject to part I of subchapter T (cooperatives), the amount of excess inclusion allocated to the foreign person must be taken into account for purposes of the 30% United States withholding tax at the same time that other income from the trust, company, fund, or organization would be taken into account.

Under these Treasury regulations, excess inclusions allocated to a foreign person (whether as a partner or holder of an interest in a pass-through entity) are expressly made subject to withholding tax. In addition, in the case of excess inclusions allocable to a foreign person as a partner, these Treasury regulations eliminate an exception to the withholding requirements under which a withholding agent unrelated to a payee is obligated to withhold on a payment only to the extent that the withholding agent has control over the payee’s money or property and knows the facts giving rise to the payment.

Noneconomic REMIC Residual Certificates.  Under the Treasury regulations, transfers of noneconomic REMIC residual certificates will be disregarded for all federal income tax purposes if “a significant purpose of the transfer was to enable the transferor to impede the assessment or collection of tax.”  If a transfer is disregarded, the purported transferor will continue to remain liable for any taxes due with respect to the income on the noneconomic REMIC residual certificate.  The Treasury regulations provide that a REMIC residual certificate is noneconomic unless, based on the prepayment assumption and on any required or permitted clean up calls, or required liquidation provided for in the related Governing Document:

● the present value of the expected future payments on the REMIC residual certificate equals at least the present value of the expected tax on the anticipated excess inclusions, and

165

● the transferor reasonably expects that the transferee will receive payments with respect to the REMIC residual certificate at or after the time the taxes accrue on the anticipated excess inclusions in an amount sufficient to satisfy the accrued taxes.

The present value calculation referred to above is calculated using the applicable Federal rate for obligations whose term ends on the close of the last quarter in which excess inclusions are expected to accrue with respect to the REMIC residual certificate.  This rate is computed and published monthly by the IRS.

Accordingly, all transfers of REMIC residual certificates that may constitute noneconomic residual interests will be subject to restrictions under the terms of the related Governing Document that are intended to reduce the possibility of any transfer being disregarded.  These restrictions will require an affidavit:

● from each party to the transfer, stating that no purpose of the transfer is to impede the assessment or collection of tax,

● from the prospective transferee, providing representations as to its financial condition and that it understands that, as the holder of a non-economic REMIC residual certificate, it may incur tax liabilities in excess of any cash flows generated by the REMIC residual certificate and that such transferee  intends to pay its taxes associated with holding such REMIC residual certificate as they become due, and

● from the prospective transferor, stating that it has made a reasonable investigation to determine the transferee’s historic payment of its debts and ability to continue to pay its debts as they come due in the future.

The Safe Harbor Regulations provide that transfers of noneconomic residual interests must meet two additional requirements to qualify for a safe harbor: (a) the transferee must represent that it will not cause income from the noneconomic residual interest to be attributable to a foreign permanent establishment or fixed base (within the meaning of an applicable income tax treaty, hereafter a “foreign branch”) of the transferee or another U.S. taxpayer, and (b) the transfer must satisfy either an “asset test” or a “formula test”. A transfer to an “eligible corporation,” generally a domestic corporation, will satisfy the asset test if: at the time of the transfer, and at the close of each of the transferee’s two fiscal years preceding the transferee’s fiscal year of transfer, the transferee’s gross and net assets for financial reporting purposes exceed $100 million and $10 million, respectively, in each case, exclusive of any obligations of certain related persons, the transferee agrees in writing that any subsequent transfer of the interest will be to another eligible corporation in a transaction that satisfies the asset test, and the transferor does not know or have reason to know, that the transferee will not honor these restrictions on subsequent transfers, and a reasonable person would not conclude, based on the facts and circumstances known to the transferor on or before the date of the transfer (specifically including the amount of consideration paid in connection with the transfer of the noneconomic residual interest) that the taxes associated with the residual interest will not be paid. In addition, the direct or indirect transfer of the residual interest to a foreign branch of a domestic corporation is not treated as a transfer to an eligible corporation under the asset test. The “formula test” makes the safe harbor unavailable unless the present value of the anticipated tax liabilities associated with holding the residual interest did not exceed the sum of:

● the present value of any consideration given to the transferee to acquire the interest,

● the present value of the expected future distributions on the interest, and

● the present value of the anticipated tax savings associated with the holding of the interest as the REMIC generates losses.

Present values must be computed using a discount rate equal to the applicable Federal short-term rate.

166

If the transferee has been subject to the alternative minimum tax in the preceding two years and will compute its taxable income in the current taxable year using the alternative minimum tax rate, then it may use the alternative minimum tax rate in lieu of the corporate tax rate. In addition, the direct or indirect transfer of the residual interest to a foreign branch of a domestic corporation is not treated as a transfer to an eligible corporation under the formula test.

The Governing Document will require that all transferees of REMIC residual certificates furnish an affidavit as to the applicability of one of the safe harbors of the Safe Harbor Regulations, unless the transferor has waived the requirement that the transferee do so.

Prospective investors are encouraged to consult their own tax advisors as to the applicability and effect of these alternative safe harbor tests.

Prior to purchasing a REMIC residual certificate, prospective purchasers should consider the possibility that a purported transfer of a REMIC residual certificate to another party at some future date may be disregarded in accordance with the above-described rules.  This would result in the retention of tax liability by the transferor with respect to that purported transfer.

We will disclose in the related prospectus supplement whether the offered REMIC residual certificates may be considered noneconomic residual interests under the Treasury regulations.  However, we will base any disclosure that a REMIC residual certificate will not be considered noneconomic upon various assumptions.  Further, we will make no representation that a REMIC residual certificate will not be considered noneconomic for purposes of the above-described rules.

See “—REMICs—Foreign Investors in REMIC Certificates” below for additional restrictions applicable to transfers of REMIC residual certificates to foreign persons.

Mark-to-Market Rules.  Regulations under section 475 of the Internal Revenue Code require that a securities dealer mark to market securities held for sale to customers.  This mark-to-market requirement applies to all securities owned by a dealer, except to the extent that the dealer has specifically identified a security as held for investment.  These regulations provide that for purposes of this mark-to-market requirement, a REMIC residual certificate is not treated as a security for purposes of section 475 of the Internal Revenue Code.  Thus, a REMIC residual certificate is not subject to the mark-to-market rules.  We recommend that prospective purchasers of a REMIC residual certificate consult their tax advisors regarding these regulations.

Transfers of REMIC Residual Certificates to Investors That Are Foreign Persons. Unless we otherwise state in the related prospectus supplement, transfers of REMIC residual certificates to investors that are foreign persons under the Internal Revenue Code will be prohibited under the related Governing Documents.

Pass-Through of Miscellaneous Itemized Deductions.  Fees and expenses of a REMIC generally will be allocated to the holders of the related REMIC residual certificates.  The applicable Treasury regulations indicate, however, that in the case of a REMIC that is similar to a single class grantor trust, all or a portion of these fees and expenses should be allocated to the holders of the related REMIC regular certificates.  Unless we state otherwise in the related prospectus supplement, however, these fees and expenses will be allocated to holders of the related REMIC residual certificates in their entirety and not to the holders of the related REMIC regular certificates.

If the holder of a REMIC certificate receives an allocation of fees and expenses in accordance with the preceding discussion, and if that holder is:

● an individual,

167

● an estate or trust, or

● a Pass-Through Entity beneficially owned by one or more individuals, estates or trusts,

then—

● an amount equal to this individual’s, estate’s or trust’s share of these fees and expenses will be added to the gross income of this holder, and

● the individual’s, estate’s or trust’s share of these fees and expenses will be treated as a miscellaneous itemized deduction allowable subject to the limitation of section 67 of the Internal Revenue Code, which permits the deduction of these fees and expenses only to the extent they exceed, in total, 2% of a taxpayer’s adjusted gross income.

In addition, section 68 of the Internal Revenue Code currently provides that the amount of itemized deductions otherwise allowable for an individual whose adjusted gross income exceeds a specified amount will be reduced by the lesser of:

● 3% of the excess, if any, of such taxpayer’s adjusted gross income over such specified amount, or

● 80% of the amount of itemized deductions otherwise allowable for such tax year.

Furthermore, in determining the alternative minimum taxable income of a holder of a REMIC certificate that is—

● an individual,

● an estate or trust, or

● a Pass-Through Entity beneficially owned by one or more individuals, estates or trusts,

no deduction will be allowed for the holder’s allocable portion of servicing fees and other miscellaneous itemized deductions of the REMIC, even though an amount equal to the amount of these fees and other deductions will be included in the holder’s gross income.

The amount of additional taxable income reportable by holders of REMIC certificates that are subject to the limitations of either section 67 or section 68 of the Internal Revenue Code, or the complete disallowance of the related expenses for alternative minimum tax purposes, may be substantial.

We recommend that those prospective investors who are individuals, estates or trusts, or a Pass-Through Entity beneficially owned by one or more individuals, estates or trusts, consult with their tax advisors prior to making an investment in a REMIC certificate to which these expenses are allocated.

Sales of REMIC Certificates.  If a REMIC certificate is sold, the selling certificateholder will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale and its adjusted basis in the REMIC certificate.  The adjusted basis of a REMIC regular certificate generally will equal:

● the cost of the certificate to that certificateholder, increased by

● income reported by that certificateholder with respect to the certificate, including original issue discount and market discount income, and reduced, but not below zero, by

168

● payments on the certificate received by that certificateholder, amortized premium and realized losses allocated to the certificate and previously deducted by the certificateholder.

The adjusted basis of a REMIC residual certificate will be determined as described above under “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Residual Certificates—Basis Rules, Net Losses and Distributions.”  Except as described below in this “—Sales of REMIC Certificates” subsection, any gain or loss from your sale of a REMIC certificate will be capital gain or loss, provided that you hold the certificate as a capital asset within the meaning of section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code, which is generally property held for investment.

In addition to the recognition of gain or loss on actual sales, section 1259 of the Internal Revenue Code requires the recognition of gain, but not loss, upon the constructive sale of an appreciated financial position.  A constructive sale of an appreciated financial position occurs if a taxpayer enters into a transaction or series of transactions that have the effect of substantially eliminating the taxpayer’s risk of loss and opportunity for gain with respect to the financial instrument.  Debt instruments that—

● entitle the holder to a specified principal amount,

● pay interest at a fixed or variable rate, and

● are not convertible into the stock of the issuer or a related party,

cannot be the subject of a constructive sale for this purpose. Because most REMIC regular certificates meet this exception, section 1259 will not apply to most REMIC regular certificates.  However, REMIC regular certificates that have no, or a disproportionately small, amount of principal, can be the subject of a constructive sale.

A taxpayer may elect to have net capital gain taxed at ordinary income rates rather than capital gains rates in order to include the net capital gain in total net investment income for the taxable year. A taxpayer would do so because of the rule that limits the deduction of interest on indebtedness incurred to purchase or carry property held for investment to a taxpayer’s net investment income.

As of the date of this prospectus, the Internal Revenue Code provides for lower rates as to long-term capital gains than those applicable to the short-term capital gains and ordinary income recognized or received by individuals.  No similar rate differential exists for corporations.  In addition, the distinction between a capital gain or loss and ordinary income or loss is relevant for other purposes to both individuals and corporations.

Gain from the sale of a REMIC regular certificate that might otherwise be a capital gain will be treated as ordinary income to the extent that the gain does not exceed the excess, if any, of:

● the amount that would have been includible in the seller’s income with respect to that REMIC regular certificate assuming that income had accrued on the certificate at a rate equal to 110% of the applicable Federal rate determined as of the date of purchase of the certificate, which is a rate based on an average of current yields on Treasury securities having a maturity comparable to that of the certificate based on the application of the prepayment assumption to the certificate, over

● the amount of ordinary income actually includible in the seller’s income prior to that sale.

In addition, gain recognized on the sale of a REMIC regular certificate by a seller who purchased the certificate at a market discount will be taxable as ordinary income in an amount not exceeding the portion of that discount that accrued during the period the certificate was held by the seller, reduced by any market discount included in income under the rules described above under “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Market Discount” and “—Premium.”

169

REMIC certificates will be “evidences of indebtedness” within the meaning of section 582(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code, so that gain or loss recognized from the sale of a REMIC certificate by a bank or thrift institution to which that section of the Internal Revenue Code applies will be ordinary income or loss.

A portion of any gain from the sale of a REMIC regular certificate that might otherwise be capital gain may be treated as ordinary income to the extent that a holder holds the certificate as part of a “conversion transaction” within the meaning of section 1258 of the Internal Revenue Code.  A conversion transaction generally is one in which the taxpayer has taken two or more positions in the same or similar property that reduce or eliminate market risk, if substantially all of the taxpayer’s return is attributable to the time value of the taxpayer’s net investment in that transaction.  The amount of gain so realized in a conversion transaction that is recharacterized as ordinary income generally will not exceed the amount of interest that would have accrued on the taxpayer’s net investment at 120% of the appropriate applicable Federal rate at the time the taxpayer enters into the conversion transaction, subject to appropriate reduction for prior inclusion of interest and other ordinary income items from the transaction.

Except as may be provided in Treasury regulations yet to be issued, a loss realized on the sale of a REMIC residual certificate will be subject to the “wash sale” rules of section 1091 of the Internal Revenue Code, if during the period beginning six months before, and ending six months after, the date of that sale the seller of that certificate:

● reacquires that same REMIC residual certificate,

● acquires any other residual interest in a REMIC, or

● acquires any similar interest in a taxable mortgage pool, as defined in section 7701(i) of the Internal Revenue Code.

In that event, any loss realized by the holder of a REMIC residual certificate on the sale will not be recognized or deductible currently, but instead will be added to that holder’s adjusted basis in the newly-acquired asset.

Losses on the sale of a REMIC residual certificate in excess of a threshold amount (which amount may need to be aggregated with similar or previous losses) may require disclosure of such loss on an IRS Form 8886.  Investors are encouraged to consult with their tax advisors as to the need to file such forms.

Prohibited Transactions Tax and Other Taxes.  The Internal Revenue Code imposes a tax on REMICs equal to 100% of the net income derived from prohibited transactions.  In general, subject to specified exceptions, a prohibited transaction includes:

● the disposition of a non-defaulted mortgage loan,

● the receipt of income from a source other than a mortgage loan or other permitted investments,

● the receipt of compensation for services, or

● the gain from the disposition of an asset purchased with collections on the mortgage loans for temporary investment pending payment on the REMIC certificates.

It is not anticipated that any REMIC will engage in any prohibited transactions as to which it would be subject to this tax.

In addition, some contributions to a REMIC made after the day on which the REMIC issues all of its interests could result in the imposition of a tax on the REMIC equal to 100% of the value of the contributed

170

property.  The related Governing Document will include provisions designed to prevent the acceptance of any contributions that would be subject to this tax.

REMICs also are subject to federal income tax at the highest corporate rate on Net Income From Foreclosure Property, determined by reference to the rules applicable to REITs.  The related Governing Document may permit the special servicer to conduct activities with respect to a mortgaged property acquired by one of our trusts in a manner that causes the trust to incur this tax, if doing so would, in the reasonable discretion of the special servicer, maximize the net after-tax proceeds to certificateholders.  However, under no circumstance may the special servicer allow the acquired mortgaged property to cease to be a “permitted investment” under section 860G(a)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Unless we state otherwise in the related prospectus supplement, and to the extent permitted by then applicable laws, any tax on prohibited transactions, particular contributions or Net Income From Foreclosure Property, and any state or local income or franchise tax, that may be imposed on a REMIC will be borne by the related trustee, tax administrator, master servicer, special servicer or manager, in any case out of its own funds, provided that—

● the person has sufficient assets to do so, and

● the tax arises out of a breach of that person’s obligations under select provisions of the related Governing Document.

Any tax not borne by one of these persons would be charged against the related trust resulting in a reduction in amounts payable to holders of the related REMIC certificates.

Tax and Restrictions on Transfers of REMIC Residual Certificates to Particular Organizations.  If a REMIC residual certificate is transferred to a Disqualified Organization, a tax will be imposed in an amount equal to the product of:

● the present value of the total anticipated excess inclusions with respect to the REMIC residual certificate for periods after the transfer, and

● the highest marginal federal income tax rate applicable to corporations.

The value of the anticipated excess inclusions is discounted using the applicable Federal rate for obligations whose term ends on the close of the last quarter in which excess inclusions are expected to accrue with respect to the REMIC residual certificate.

The anticipated excess inclusions must be determined as of the date that the REMIC residual certificate is transferred and must be based on:

● events that have occurred up to the time of the transfer,

● the prepayment assumption, and

● any required or permitted clean up calls or required liquidation provided for in the related Governing Document.

171

The tax on transfers to Disqualified Organizations generally would be imposed on the transferor of the REMIC residual certificate, except when the transfer is through an agent for a Disqualified Organization.  In that case, the tax would instead be imposed on the agent.  However, a transferor of a REMIC residual certificate would in no event be liable for the tax with respect to a transfer if:

● the transferee furnishes to the transferor an affidavit that the transferee is not a Disqualified Organization, and

● as of the time of the transfer, the transferor does not have actual knowledge that the  affidavit is false.

In addition, if a Pass-Through Entity includes in income excess inclusions with respect to a REMIC residual certificate, and a Disqualified Organization is the record holder of an interest in that entity, then a tax will be imposed on that entity equal to the product of:

● the amount of excess inclusions on the certificate that are allocable to the interest in the Pass-Through Entity held by the Disqualified Organization, and

● the highest marginal federal income tax rate imposed on corporations.

A Pass-Through Entity will not be subject to this tax for any period, however, if each record holder of an interest in that Pass-Through Entity furnishes to that Pass-Through Entity:

● the holder’s social security number and a statement under penalties of perjury that the social security number is that of the record holder, or

● a statement under penalties of perjury that the record holder is not a Disqualified Organization.

If an Electing Large Partnership holds a REMIC residual certificate, all interests in the Electing Large Partnership are treated as held by Disqualified Organizations for purposes of the tax imposed on pass-through entities described in the second preceding paragraph.  This tax on Electing Large Partnerships must be paid even if each record holder of an interest in that partnership provides a statement mentioned in the prior paragraph.

In addition, a person holding an interest in a Pass-Through Entity as a nominee for another person will, with respect to that interest, be treated as a Pass-Through Entity.

Moreover, an entity will not qualify as a REMIC unless there are reasonable arrangements designed to ensure that:

● the residual interests in the entity are not held by Disqualified Organizations, and

● the information necessary for the application of the tax described in this prospectus will be made available.

We will include in the related Governing Document restrictions on the transfer of REMIC residual certificates and other provisions that are intended to meet this requirement, and we will discuss those restrictions and provisions in any prospectus supplement relating to the offering of any REMIC residual certificate.

Termination.  A REMIC will terminate immediately after the distribution date following receipt by the REMIC of the final payment with respect to the related mortgage loans or upon a sale of the REMIC’s assets following the adoption by the REMIC of a plan of complete liquidation.  The last payment on a REMIC regular certificate will be treated as a payment in retirement of a debt instrument.  In the case of a REMIC residual

172

certificate, if the last payment on that certificate is less than the REMIC residual certificateholder’s adjusted basis in the certificate, that holder should, but may not, be treated as realizing a capital loss equal to the amount of that difference.

Reporting and Other Administrative Matters.  Solely for purposes of the administrative provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, a REMIC will be treated as a partnership and holders of the related REMIC residual certificates will be treated as partners.  Unless we otherwise state in the related prospectus supplement, the related tax administrator will file REMIC federal income tax returns on behalf of the REMIC, and will be designated as and will act as or on behalf of the tax matters person with respect to the REMIC in all respects.

As, or as agent for, the tax matters person, the related tax administrator, subject to applicable notice requirements and various restrictions and limitations, generally will have the authority to act on behalf of the REMIC and the holders of the REMIC residual certificates in connection with the administrative and judicial review of the REMIC’s—

● income,

● deductions,

● gains,

● losses, and

● classification as a REMIC.

Holders of REMIC residual certificates generally will be required to report these REMIC items consistently with their treatment on the related REMIC’s tax return.  In addition, these holders may in some circumstances be bound by a settlement agreement between the related tax administrator, as, or as agent for, the tax matters person, and the IRS concerning any REMIC item.  Adjustments made to the REMIC’s tax return may require these holders to make corresponding adjustments on their returns.  An audit of the REMIC’s tax return, or the adjustments resulting from that audit, could result in an audit of a holder’s return.

  Any person that holds a REMIC residual certificate as a nominee for another person may be required to furnish to the related REMIC, in a manner to be provided in Treasury regulations, the name and address of that other person, as well as other information.

Reporting of interest income, including any original issue discount, with respect to REMIC regular certificates is required annually, and may be required more frequently under Treasury regulations.  These information reports generally are required to be sent or made readily available through electronic means to individual holders of REMIC regular certificates and the IRS.  Holders of REMIC regular certificates that are—

● corporations,

● trusts,

● securities dealers, and

● various other non-individuals,

173

will be provided interest and original issue discount income information and the information set forth in the following paragraphs.  This information will be provided upon request in accordance with the requirements of the applicable regulations.  The information must be provided by the later of:

● 30 days after the end of the quarter for which the information was requested, or

● two weeks after the receipt of the request.

Reporting with respect to REMIC residual certificates, including—

● income,

● excess inclusions,

● investment expenses, and

● relevant information regarding qualification of the REMIC’s assets,

will be made as required under the Treasury regulations, generally on a quarterly basis.

As applicable, the REMIC regular certificate information reports will include a statement of the adjusted issue price of the REMIC regular certificate at the beginning of each accrual period.  In addition, the reports will include information required by regulations with respect to computing the accrual of any market discount.  Because exact computation of the accrual of market discount on a constant yield method would require information relating to the holder’s purchase price that the REMIC may not have, the regulations only require that information pertaining to the appropriate proportionate method of accruing market discount be provided.  See “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Market Discount.”

Unless we otherwise specify in the related prospectus supplement, the responsibility for complying with the foregoing reporting rules will be borne by the related tax administrator for the subject REMIC.

Backup Withholding with Respect to REMIC Certificates.  Payments of interest and principal, as well as payments of proceeds from the sale of REMIC certificates, may be subject to the backup withholding tax under section 3406 of the Internal Revenue Code if recipients of these payments:

● fail to furnish to the payor information regarding, among other things, their taxpayer identification numbers, or

● otherwise fail to establish an exemption from this tax.

Any amounts deducted and withheld from a payment to a recipient would be allowed as a credit against the recipient’s federal income tax.  Furthermore, penalties may be imposed by the IRS on a recipient of payments that is required to supply information but that does not do so in the proper manner.

Foreign Investors in REMIC Certificates.  Unless we otherwise disclose in the related prospectus supplement, a holder of a REMIC regular certificate that is—

● a foreign person, and

● not subject to federal income tax as a result of any direct or indirect connection to the United States in addition to its ownership of that certificate,

174

will normally not be subject to United States federal income or withholding tax with respect to a payment on a REMIC regular certificate, except as otherwise required by FATCA. See “—FATCA” below.  To avoid withholding or tax, that holder must comply with applicable identification requirements. These requirements include delivery of a statement, signed by the certificateholder under penalties of perjury, certifying that the certificateholder is a foreign person and providing the name, address and such other information with respect to the certificateholder as may be required by Treasury regulations.  Additional information may be required from holders under FATCA.  See “—FATCA” below.   Special rules apply to partnerships, estates and trusts, and in certain circumstances certifications as to foreign status and other matters may be required to be provided by partners and beneficiaries thereof.

For these purposes, a foreign person is anyone other than a U.S. Person.

It is possible that the IRS may assert that the foregoing tax exemption should not apply with respect to a REMIC regular certificate held by a person or entity that owns directly or indirectly a 10% or greater interest in the related REMIC residual certificates.  If the holder does not qualify for exemption, payments of interest, including payments in respect of accrued original issue discount, to that holder may be subject to a tax rate of 30%, subject to reduction under any applicable tax treaty.

It is possible, under regulations promulgated under section 881 of the Internal Revenue Code concerning conduit financing transactions, that the exemption from withholding taxes described above may also not be available to a holder who is a foreign person and either—

● owns 10% or more of one or more underlying mortgagors, or

● if the holder is a controlled foreign corporation, is related to one or more mortgagors in the applicable trust.

Further, it appears that a REMIC regular certificate would not be included in the estate of a nonresident alien individual and would not be subject to United States estate taxes.  However, it is recommended that certificateholders who are nonresident alien individuals consult their tax advisors concerning this question.

Unless we otherwise state in the related prospectus supplement, the related Governing Document will prohibit transfers of REMIC residual certificates to investors that are:

● foreign persons, or

● an entity that is classified as a U.S. partnership under the Internal Revenue Code if any of its partners, directly or indirectly (other than through a U.S. corporation) is (or is permitted to be under the partnership agreement) a foreign person.

FATCA.  Under the “Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act” (“FATCA”) provisions of the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act and recently issued Treasury regulations and IRS guidance, a 30% withholding tax is generally imposed on certain payments, including U.S.-source interest made on or after July 1, 2014, and gross proceeds, including the return of principal, from the disposition of debt obligations that give rise to U.S.-source interest on or after January 1, 2017,  to “foreign financial institutions” and certain non-financial foreign entities if those foreign entities fail to comply with the requirements of FATCA.  The certificate administrator will be required to withhold amounts under FATCA on payments made to holders who are subject to the FATCA requirements and who fail to provide the certificate administrator with proof that they have complied with such requirements.  No additional amounts will be paid in respect of any amounts withheld.  Prospective investors should consult their tax advisors regarding the applicability of FATCA to their REMIC certificates.

175

3.8% Medicare Tax on “Net Investment Income”.  Certain non-corporate U.S. Persons will be subject to an additional 3.8% tax on all or a portion of their “net investment income”, which may include the interest payments and any gain realized with respect to the REMIC certificates, less certain deductions.  U.S. Persons should consult their tax advisors with respect to their consequences with respect to the 3.8% Medicare tax.

Taxation of Classes of Exchangeable Certificates

General. Solely for United States federal income tax purposes, the arrangement established to hold the Exchangeable Certificates will be classified as a grantor trust under subpart E, part I of subchapter J of the Internal Revenue Code (the “PEZ Trust”) and the holders of the Exchangeable Certificates will be treated either as owning direct interests in one or more REMIC regular interests or beneficial interests in one or more REMIC regular interests held in the PEZ Trust.  If an Exchangeable Certificate represents beneficial ownership of REMIC regular interests held in the PEZ Trust, then, subject to the discussion below, the holder of the Exchangeable Certificate will be treated for income tax purposes as the owner of those REMIC regular interests under section 671 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Whether an Exchangeable Certificate represents a portion of one or more underlying REMIC regular interests held directly or held in the PEZ Trust, the interests in each REMIC regular interest underlying the Exchangeable Certificates will, subject to the discussion below, be accounted for separately and have the same consequences to the holder of the Exchangeable Certificate as if such interests in the underlying REMIC regular interest were held outside the PEZ Trust.

Exchangeable Certificates Representing Proportionate Interests in Two or More REMIC Regular Interests. The related prospectus supplement for a series of offered certificates will specify whether an Exchangeable Certificate represents beneficial ownership of a proportionate interest in each REMIC regular interest corresponding to that Exchangeable Certificate. Each beneficial owner of such an Exchangeable Certificate should account for its ownership interest in each REMIC regular interest underlying that Exchangeable Certificate as if such REMIC regular interest were a REMIC regular certificate, as described in “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates” above.  Consequently, the beneficial owner must allocate its cost to acquire that Exchangeable Certificate among the related underlying REMIC regular interests in proportion to their relative fair market values at the time of acquisition. When such a beneficial owner sells the Exchangeable Certificate, the owner must allocate the sale proceeds among the underlying REMIC regular interests in proportion to their relative fair market values at the time of sale.

Under the OID regulations, if two or more debt instruments are issued in connection with the same transaction or related transaction (determined based on all the facts and circumstances), those debt instruments are treated as a single debt instrument for purposes of the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to OID, unless an exception applies. Under this rule, if an Exchangeable Certificate represents beneficial ownership of two or more REMIC regular interests, those REMIC regular interests could be treated as a single debt instrument for OID purposes. In addition, if the two or more REMIC regular interests underlying an Exchangeable Certificate were aggregated for OID purposes and a beneficial owner of an Exchangeable Certificate were to (i) exchange that Exchangeable Certificate for the related underlying REMIC regular interests (or separate Exchangeable Certificates representing each underlying REMIC regular interests), (ii) sell one of those related REMIC regular interests (or Exchangeable Certificates representing such REMIC regular interests) and (iii) retain one or more of the remaining related REMIC regular interests (or Exchangeable Certificates representing such REMIC regular interests), the beneficial owner might be treated as having engaged in a “coupon stripping” or “bond stripping” transaction within the meaning of section 1286 of the Internal Revenue Code. Under section 1286 of the Internal Revenue Code, a beneficial owner of an Exchangeable Certificate that engages in a coupon stripping or bond stripping transaction must allocate its basis in the original Exchangeable Certificate between the related underlying REMIC regular interests sold and the related REMIC regular interests retained in proportion to their relative fair market values as of the date of the stripping transaction. The beneficial owner then must recognize gain or loss on the REMIC regular interests (or Exchangeable Certificates representing such REMIC regular

176

interests) sold using its basis allocable to those REMIC regular interests. Also, the beneficial owner then must treat the REMIC regular interests underlying the Exchangeable Certificates retained as a newly issued debt instrument that was purchased for an amount equal to the beneficial owner’s basis allocable to those REMIC regular interests. Accordingly, the beneficial owner must accrue interest and OID with respect to the REMIC regular interests retained based on the beneficial owner’s basis in those REMIC regular interests.

As a result, when compared to treating each REMIC regular interest underlying an Exchangeable Certificate as a separate debt instrument, aggregating the REMIC regular interests underlying an Exchangeable Certificate could affect the timing and character of income recognized by a beneficial owner of an Exchangeable Certificate. Moreover, if section 1286 of the Internal Revenue Code were to apply to a beneficial owner of an Exchangeable Certificate, much of the information necessary to perform the related calculations for information reporting purposes generally would not be available to the trustee. Because it may not be clear whether the aggregation rule in the OID regulations applies to the Exchangeable Certificates and due to the trustee’s lack of information necessary to report computations that might be required by section 1286 of the Internal Revenue Code, the trustee will treat each REMIC regular interest underlying an Exchangeable Certificate as a separate debt instrument for information reporting purposes. Prospective investors should note that, if the two or more REMIC regular interests underlying an Exchangeable Certificate were aggregated, the timing of accruals of OID applicable to an Exchangeable Certificate could be different than that reported to holders and the IRS. Prospective investors are advised to consult their own tax advisors regarding any possible tax consequences to them if the IRS were to assert that the REMIC regular interests underlying the Exchangeable Certificates should be aggregated for OID purposes.

Exchangeable Certificates Representing Disproportionate Interests in REMIC Regular Interests. The related prospectus supplement for a series of offered certificates will specify whether an Exchangeable Certificate represents beneficial ownership of a disproportionate interest in the REMIC regular interest corresponding to that Exchangeable Certificate. The tax consequences to a beneficial owner of an Exchangeable Certificate of this type will be determined under section 1286 of the Internal Revenue Code, except as discussed below. Under section 1286 of the Internal Revenue Code, a beneficial owner of an Exchangeable Certificate will be treated as owning “stripped bonds” to the extent of its share of principal payments and “stripped coupons” to the extent of its share of interest payment on the underlying REMIC regular interests. If an Exchangeable Certificate entitles the holder to payments of principal and interest on an underlying REMIC regular interest, the IRS could contend that the Exchangeable Certificate should be treated (i) as an interest in the underlying REMIC regular interest to the extent that the Exchangeable Certificate represents an equal pro rata portion of principal and interest on the underlying REMIC regular interest, and (ii) with respect to the remainder, as an installment obligation consisting of “stripped bonds” to the extent of its share of principal payments or “stripped coupons” to the extent of its share of interest payments. For purposes of information reporting, however, the trustee will treat each Exchangeable Certificate as a single debt instrument, regardless of whether the treatment described in the immediately preceding sentence could apply.

Under section 1286 of the Internal Revenue Code, each beneficial owner of an Exchangeable Certificate must treat the Exchangeable Certificate as a debt instrument originally issued on the date the owner acquires it and as having OID equal to the excess, if any, of its “stated redemption price at maturity” over the price paid by the owner to acquire it. The stated redemption price at maturity for an Exchangeable Certificate is determined in the same manner as described with respect to REMIC regular certificates in “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Original Issue Discount” above.

If the Exchangeable Certificate has OID, the beneficial owner must include the OID in its ordinary income for federal income tax purposes as the OID accrues, which may be prior to the receipt of the cash attributable to that income. Although the matter is not entirely clear, a beneficial owner should accrue OID using a method similar to that described with respect to the accrual of OID on a REMIC regular certificate under “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Original Issue Discount.” A beneficial owner, however, determines its yield to maturity based on its purchase price. For a particular beneficial owner, it is not

177

clear whether the prepayment assumption used for calculating OID would be one determined at the time the Exchangeable Certificate is acquired or would be the prepayment assumption for the underlying REMIC regular interests.

In light of the application of section 1286 of the Internal Revenue Code, a beneficial owner of an Exchangeable Certificate generally will be required to compute accruals of OID based on its yield, possibly taking into account its own prepayment assumption. The information necessary to perform the related calculations for information reporting purposes, however, generally will not be available to the trustee. Accordingly, any information reporting provided by the trustee with respect to the Exchangeable Certificates, which information will be based on pricing information as of the closing date, will largely fail to reflect the accurate accruals of OID for these certificates. Prospective investors therefore should be aware that the timing of accruals of OID applicable to an Exchangeable Certificate generally will be different than that reported to holders and the IRS. Prospective investors are advised to consult their own tax advisors regarding their obligation to compute and include in income the correct amount of OID accruals and any possible tax consequences should they fail to do so.

The rules of section 1286 of the Internal Revenue Code also apply if (i) a beneficial owner of REMIC regular interests exchanges them for an Exchangeable Certificate, (ii) the beneficial owner sells some, but not all, of the Exchangeable Certificates, and (iii) the combination of retained Exchangeable Certificates cannot be exchanged for the related REMIC regular interests. As of the date of such a sale, the beneficial owner must allocate its basis in the REMIC regular interests between the part of the REMIC regular interests underlying the Exchangeable Certificates sold and the part of the REMIC regular interests underlying the Exchangeable Certificates retained in proportion to their relative fair market values. Section 1286 of the Internal Revenue Code treats the beneficial owner as purchasing the Exchangeable Certificates retained for the amount of the basis allocated to the retained Exchangeable Certificates, and the beneficial owner must then accrue any OID with respect to the retained Exchangeable Certificates as described above. Section 1286 of the Internal Revenue Code does not apply, however, if a beneficial owner exchanges REMIC regular interests for the related Exchangeable Certificates and retains all the Exchangeable Certificates, see “—Treatment of Exchanges” below.

Upon the sale of an Exchangeable Certificate, a beneficial owner will realize gain or loss on the sale in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized and its adjusted basis in the Exchangeable Certificate. The owner’s adjusted basis generally is equal to the owner’s cost of the Exchangeable Certificate (or portion of the cost of REMIC regular interests allocable to the Exchangeable Certificate), increased by income previously included, and reduced (but not below zero) by distributions previously received and by any amortized premium. If the beneficial owner holds the Exchangeable Certificate as a capital asset, any gain or loss realized will be capital gain or loss, except to the extent provided under “—REMICs—Sales of REMIC Certificates.”

Although the matter is not free from doubt, if a beneficial owner acquires in one transaction (that is not an exchange described under “—Treatment of Exchanges” below) a combination of Exchangeable Certificates that may be exchanged for underlying REMIC regular interests, the owner should be treated as owning the underlying REMIC regular interests, in which case section 1286 of the Internal Revenue Code would not apply. If a beneficial owner acquires such a combination in separate transactions, the law is unclear as to whether the combination should be aggregated or each Exchangeable Certificate should be treated as a separate debt instrument. You should consult your tax advisors regarding the proper treatment of Exchangeable Certificates in this regard.

Treatment of Exchanges. If a beneficial owner of one or more Exchangeable Certificates exchanges them for the related Exchangeable Certificates in the manner described under “Description of the Certificates—Exchangeable Certificates” in this prospectus, the exchange will not be taxable. In such a case, the beneficial owner will be treated as continuing to own after the exchange the same combination of interests in each related underlying REMIC regular interest that it owned immediately prior to the exchange.

178

FATCA.  In general, the rules described under “—REMICs—FATCA” above will also apply to Exchangeable Certificates.

Grantor Trusts

Classification of Grantor Trusts.  With respect to each series of grantor trust certificates, our counsel will deliver its opinion to the effect that, assuming compliance with all provisions of the related Governing Document, the related trust, or relevant portion of that trust, will be classified as a grantor trust under subpart E, part I of subchapter J of the Internal Revenue Code and not as a partnership or an association taxable as a corporation.

A grantor trust certificate may be classified as either of the following types of certificate:

● a grantor trust fractional interest certificate representing an undivided equitable ownership interest in the principal of the mortgage loans constituting the related grantor trust, together with interest, if any, on those loans at a pass-through rate; or

● a grantor trust strip certificate representing ownership of all or a portion of an amount equal to—

1. interest paid on the mortgage loans constituting the related grantor trust, minus

2. the sum of:

● normal administration fees, and

● interest paid to the holders of grantor trust fractional interest certificates issued with respect to that grantor trust

A grantor trust strip certificate may also evidence a nominal ownership interest in the principal of the mortgage loans constituting the related grantor trust.

Characterization of Investments in Grantor Trust Certificates.

Grantor Trust Fractional Interest Certificates.  Unless we otherwise disclose in the related prospectus supplement, any offered certificates that are grantor trust fractional interest certificates will generally represent interests in:

● “loans . . . secured by an interest in real property” within the meaning of section 7701(a)(19)(C)(v) of the Internal Revenue Code, but only to the extent that the underlying mortgage loans have been made with respect to property that is used for residential or other prescribed purposes;

● “obligation[s] (including any participation or certificate of beneficial ownership therein) which . . . [are] principally secured by an interest in real property” within the meaning of section 860G(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code; and

● “real estate assets” within the meaning of section 856(c)(5)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code.

In addition, interest on offered certificates that are grantor trust fractional interest certificates will, to the same extent, be considered “interest on obligations secured by mortgages on real property or on interests in real property” within the meaning of section 856(c)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code.

179

Grantor Trust Strip Certificates.  Even if grantor trust strip certificates evidence an interest in a grantor trust—

● consisting of mortgage loans that are “loans . . . secured by an interest in real property” within the meaning of section 7701(a)(19)(C)(v) of the Internal Revenue Code,

● consisting of mortgage loans that are “real estate assets” within the meaning of section 856(c)(5)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code, and

● the interest on which is “interest on obligations secured by mortgages on real property or on interests in real property” within the meaning of section 856(c)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code,

it is unclear whether the grantor trust strip certificates, and the income from those certificates, will be so characterized.  We recommend that prospective purchasers to which the characterization of an investment in grantor trust strip certificates is material consult their tax advisors regarding whether the grantor trust strip certificates, and the income from those certificates, will be so characterized.

The grantor trust strip certificates will be “obligation[s] (including any participation or certificate of beneficial ownership therein) which . . . [are] principally secured by an interest in real property” within the meaning of section 860G(a)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Taxation of Owners of Grantor Trust Fractional Interest Certificates.

General.  Holders of a particular series of grantor trust fractional interest certificates generally:

● will be required to report on their federal income tax returns their shares of the entire income from the underlying mortgage loans, including amounts used to pay reasonable servicing fees and other expenses, and

● will be entitled to deduct their shares of any reasonable servicing fees and other expenses.

Because of the existence of stripped interests, market or original issue discount, or premium, the amount includible in income on account of a grantor trust fractional interest certificate may differ significantly from interest paid or accrued on the underlying mortgage loans.

Section 67 of the Internal Revenue Code allows an individual, estate or trust holding a grantor trust fractional interest certificate directly or through some types of pass-through entities a deduction for any reasonable servicing fees and expenses only to the extent that the total of the holder’s miscellaneous itemized deductions exceeds two percent of the holder’s adjusted gross income.

Section 68 of the Internal Revenue Code reduces the amount of itemized deductions otherwise allowable for an individual whose adjusted gross income exceeds a specified amount.

The amount of additional taxable income reportable by holders of grantor trust fractional interest certificates who are subject to the limitations of either section 67 or section 68 of the Internal Revenue Code may be substantial.  Further, certificateholders, other than corporations, subject to the alternative minimum tax may not deduct miscellaneous itemized deductions in determining their alternative minimum taxable income.

Although it is not entirely clear, it appears that in transactions in which multiple classes of grantor trust certificates, including grantor trust strip certificates, are issued, any fees and expenses should be allocated among those classes of grantor trust certificates.  The method of this allocation should recognize that each class benefits

180

from the related services.  In the absence of statutory or administrative clarification as to the method to be used, we currently expect that information returns or reports to the IRS and certificateholders will be based on a method that allocates these fees and expenses among classes of grantor trust certificates with respect to each period based on the payments made to each class during that period.

The federal income tax treatment of grantor trust fractional interest certificates of any series will depend on whether they are subject to the stripped bond rules of section 1286 of the Internal Revenue Code.  Grantor trust fractional interest certificates may be subject to those rules if:

● a class of grantor trust strip certificates is issued as part of the same series, or

● we or any of our affiliates retain, for our or its own account or for purposes of resale, a right to receive a specified portion of the interest payable on an underlying mortgage loan.

Further, the IRS has ruled that an unreasonably high servicing fee retained by a seller or servicer will be treated as a retained ownership interest in mortgage loans that constitutes a stripped coupon.  We will include in the related prospectus supplement information regarding servicing fees paid out of the assets of the related trust to:

● a master servicer,

● a special servicer,

● any sub-servicer, or

● their respective affiliates.

With respect to certain categories of debt instruments, section 1272(a)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code requires the use of a reasonable prepayment assumption in accruing original issue discount, and adjustments in the accrual of original issue discount when prepayments do not conform to the prepayment assumption.

The scope of this section covers investments in any pool of debt instruments the yield on which may be affected by reason of prepayments.  The precise application of section 1272(a)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code to pools of debt instruments is unclear in certain respects.  For example, it is uncertain whether a prepayment assumption will be applied collectively to all of a taxpayer’s investments in these pools of debt instruments, or on an investment-by-investment basis. Similarly, it is not clear whether the assumed prepayment rate as to investments in grantor trust fractional interest certificates is to be determined based on conditions at the time of the first sale of the certificate or, with respect to any holder, at the time of purchase of the certificate by that holder.

We recommend that certificateholders consult their tax advisors concerning reporting original issue discount, market discount and premium with respect to grantor trust fractional interest certificates.

If Stripped Bond Rules Apply.  If the stripped bond rules apply, each grantor trust fractional interest certificate will be treated as having been issued with original issue discount within the meaning of section 1273(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.  This is subject, however, to the discussion below regarding:

● the treatment of some stripped bonds as market discount bonds, and

● de minimis market discount.

See “—Grantor Trusts—Taxation of Owners of Grantor Trust Fractional Interest Certificates— Market Discount” below.

181

The holder of a grantor trust fractional interest certificate will report interest income from its grantor trust fractional interest certificate for each month to the extent it constitutes “qualified stated interest” in accordance with its normal method of accounting.  See “REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Original Issue Discount” in this prospectus for a description of qualified stated interest.

The original issue discount on a grantor trust fractional interest certificate will be the excess of the certificate’s stated redemption price over its issue price.  The issue price of a grantor trust fractional interest certificate as to any purchaser will be equal to the price paid by that purchaser of the grantor trust fractional interest certificate.  The stated redemption price of a grantor trust fractional interest certificate will be the sum of all payments to be made on that certificate, other than qualified stated interest, if any, and the certificate’s share of reasonable servicing fees and other expenses.

In general, the amount of that income that accrues in any month would equal the product of:

● the holder’s adjusted basis in the grantor trust fractional interest certificate at the beginning of the related month, as defined in “—Grantor Trusts—Sales of Grantor Trust Certificates,” and

● the yield of that grantor trust fractional interest certificate to the holder.

The yield would be computed at the rate, that, if used to discount the holder’s share of future payments on the related mortgage loans, would cause the present value of those future payments to equal the price at which the holder purchased the certificate.  This rate is compounded based on the regular interval between distribution dates.  In computing yield under the stripped bond rules, a certificateholder’s share of future payments on the related mortgage loans will not include any payments made with respect to any ownership interest in those mortgage loans retained by us, a master servicer, a special servicer, a sub-servicer or our or their respective affiliates, but will include the certificateholder’s share of any reasonable servicing fees and other expenses and is based generally on the method described in section 1272(a)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code.  The precise means of applying that method is uncertain in various respects.  See “—Grantor Trusts—Taxation of Owners of Grantor Trust Fractional Interest Certificates—General.”

In the case of a grantor trust fractional interest certificate acquired at a price equal to the principal amount of the related mortgage loans allocable to that certificate, the use of a prepayment assumption generally would not have any significant effect on the yield used in calculating accruals of interest income.  In the case, however, of a grantor trust fractional interest certificate acquired at a price less than or greater than the principal amount, respectively, the use of a reasonable prepayment assumption would increase or decrease the yield.  Therefore, the use of this prepayment assumption would accelerate or decelerate, respectively, the reporting of income.

In the absence of statutory or administrative clarification, we currently expect that information reports or returns to the IRS and certificateholders will be based on:

● a prepayment assumption determined when certificates are offered and sold hereunder, which we will disclose in the related prospectus supplement, and

● a constant yield computed using a representative initial offering price for each class of certificates.

However, neither we nor any other person will make any representation that—

● the mortgage loans in any of our trusts will in fact prepay at a rate conforming to the prepayment assumption used or any other rate, or

● the prepayment assumption will not be challenged by the IRS on audit.

182

Certificateholders also should bear in mind that the use of a representative initial offering price will mean that the information returns or reports that we send, even if otherwise accepted as accurate by the IRS, will in any event be accurate only as to the initial certificateholders of each series who bought at that price.

Under Treasury regulation section 1.1286-1, some stripped bonds are to be treated as market discount bonds.  Accordingly, any purchaser of that bond is to account for any discount on the bond as market discount rather than original issue discount.  This treatment only applies, however, if immediately after the most recent disposition of the bond by a person stripping one or more coupons from the bond and disposing of the bond or coupon:

● there is no original issue discount or only a de minimis amount of original issue discount, or

● the annual stated rate of interest payable on the original bond is no more than one percentage point lower than the gross interest rate payable on the related mortgage loans, before subtracting any servicing fee or any stripped coupon.

If interest payable on a grantor trust fractional interest certificate is more than one percentage point lower than the gross interest rate payable on the related mortgage loans, we will disclose that fact in the related prospectus supplement.  If the original issue discount or market discount on a grantor trust fractional interest certificate determined under the stripped bond rules is less than the product of:

● 0.25% of the stated redemption price, and

● the weighted average maturity of the related mortgage loans,

then the original issue discount or market discount will be considered to be zero under the de minimis rule.  Original issue discount or market discount of only a de minimis amount will be included in income in the same manner as de minimis original issue discount and market discount described in “—Grantor Trusts—Taxation of Owners of Grantor Trust Fractional Interest Certificates—If Stripped Bond Rules Do Not Apply” and “—Market Discount” below.

If Stripped Bond Rules Do Not Apply.  Subject to the discussion below on original issue discount, if the stripped bond rules do not apply to a grantor trust fractional interest certificate, the certificateholder will be required to report its share of the interest income on the related mortgage loans in accordance with the certificateholder’s normal method of accounting.  In that case, the original issue discount rules will apply, even if the stripped bond rules do not apply, to a grantor trust fractional interest certificate to the extent it evidences an interest in mortgage loans issued with original issue discount.

The original issue discount, if any, on mortgage loans will equal the difference between:

● the stated redemption price of the mortgage loans, and

● their issue price.

For a definition of “stated redemption price,” see “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Original Issue Discount” above.  In general, the issue price of a mortgage loan will be the amount received by the borrower from the lender under the terms of the mortgage loan.  If the borrower separately pays points to the lender that are not paid for services provided by the lender, such as commitment fees or loan processing costs, the amount of those points paid reduces the issue price.

The stated redemption price of a mortgage loan will generally equal its principal amount.  The determination as to whether original issue discount will be considered to be de minimis will be calculated using

183

the same test as in the REMIC discussion.  See “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Original Issue Discount” above.

If original issue discount is in excess of a de minimis amount, all original issue discount with respect to a mortgage loan will be required to be accrued and reported in income each month, based generally on the method described in section 1272(a)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code.  The precise means of applying that method is uncertain in various respects, however.  See “—Grantor Trusts—Taxation of Owners of Grantor Trust Fractional Interest Certificates—General.”

A purchaser of a grantor trust fractional interest certificate may purchase the grantor trust fractional interest certificate at a cost less than the certificate’s allocable portion of the total remaining stated redemption price of the underlying mortgage loans.  In that case, the purchaser will also be required to include in gross income the certificate’s daily portions of any original issue discount with respect to those mortgage loans.  However, each daily portion will be reduced, if the cost of the grantor trust fractional interest certificate to the purchaser is in excess of the certificate’s allocable portion of the aggregate adjusted issue prices of the underlying mortgage loans. The reduction will be approximately in proportion to the ratio that the excess bears to the certificate’s allocable portion of the total original issue discount remaining to be accrued on those mortgage loans.

The adjusted issue price of a mortgage loan on any given day equals the sum of:

● the adjusted issue price or the issue price, in the case of the first accrual period, of the mortgage loan at the beginning of the accrual period that includes that day, and

● the daily portions of original issue discount for all days during the accrual period prior to that day, and reduced by

● the amount of any payments made on the mortgage loan during the accrual period prior to that day of amounts included in its stated redemption price.

The adjusted issue price of a mortgage loan at the beginning of any accrual period will equal:

● the issue price of the mortgage loan, increased by

● the total amount of original issue discount with respect to the mortgage loan that accrued in prior accrual periods, and reduced by

● the amount of any payments made on the mortgage loan in prior accrual periods of amounts included in its stated redemption price.

In the absence of statutory or administrative clarification, we currently expect that information reports or returns to the IRS and certificateholders will be based on:

● a prepayment assumption determined when the certificates are offered and sold hereunder and disclosed in the related prospectus supplement, and

● a constant yield computed using a representative initial offering price for each class of certificates.

However, neither we nor any other person will make any representation that—

● the mortgage loans will in fact prepay at a rate conforming to the prepayment assumption or any other rate, or

184

● the prepayment assumption will not be challenged by the IRS on audit.

Certificateholders also should bear in mind that the use of a representative initial offering price will mean that the information returns or reports, even if otherwise accepted as accurate by the IRS, will in any event be accurate only as to the initial certificateholders of each series who bought at that price.

Market Discount.  If the stripped bond rules do not apply to a grantor trust fractional interest certificate, a certificateholder may be subject to the market discount rules of sections 1276 through 1278 of the Internal Revenue Code to the extent an interest in a mortgage loan is considered to have been purchased at a market discount.  A mortgage loan is considered to have been purchased at a market discount if—

● in the case of a mortgage loan issued without original issue discount, it is purchased at a price less than its remaining stated redemption price, or

● in the case of a mortgage loan issued with original issue discount, it is purchased at a price less than its adjusted issue price.

If market discount is in excess of a de minimis amount, the holder generally must include in income in each month the amount of the discount that has accrued, under the rules described below, through that month that has not previously been included in income.  However, the inclusion will be limited, in the case of the portion of the discount that is allocable to any mortgage loan, to the payment of stated redemption price on the mortgage loan that is received by or, for accrual method certificateholders, due to the trust in that month.  A certificateholder may elect to include market discount in income currently as it accrues, under a constant yield method based on the yield of the certificate to the holder, rather than including it on a deferred basis in accordance with the foregoing. Such market discount will be accrued based generally on the method described in section 1272(a)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code.  The precise means of applying that method is uncertain in various respects, however.  See “Grantor Trusts—Taxation of Owners of Grantor Trust Fractional Interest Certificates—General.”

We recommend that certificateholders consult their own tax advisors concerning accrual of market discount with respect to grantor trust fractional interest certificates.  Certificateholders should also refer to the related prospectus supplement to determine whether and in what manner the market discount will apply to the underlying mortgage loans purchased at a market discount.

To the extent that the underlying mortgage loans provide for periodic payments of stated redemption price, you may be required to include market discount in income at a rate that is not significantly slower than the rate at which that discount would be included in income if it were original issue discount.

Market discount with respect to mortgage loans may be considered to be de minimis and, if so, will be includible in income under de minimis rules similar to those described under “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Original Issue Discount” above.

Further, under the rules described under “—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Regular Certificates—Market Discount” above, any discount that is not original issue discount and exceeds a de minimis amount may require the deferral of interest expense deductions attributable to accrued market discount not yet includible in income, unless an election has been made to report market discount currently as it accrues.  This rule applies without regard to the origination dates of the underlying mortgage loans.

Premium.  If a certificateholder is treated as acquiring the underlying mortgage loans at a premium, which is a price in excess of their remaining stated redemption price, the certificateholder may elect under section 171 of the Internal Revenue Code to amortize the portion of that premium allocable to mortgage loans originated after September 27, 1985 using a constant yield method.  Amortizable premium is treated as an offset to interest

185

income on the related debt instrument, rather than as a separate interest deduction.  However, premium allocable to mortgage loans originated before September 28, 1985 or to mortgage loans for which an amortization election is not made, should:

● be allocated among the payments of stated redemption price on the mortgage loan, and

● be allowed as a deduction as those payments are made or, for an accrual method certificateholder, due.

It appears that a prepayment assumption should be used in computing amortization of premium allowable under section 171 of the Internal Revenue Code similar to that described for calculating the accrual of market discount of grantor trust fractional interest certificates based generally on the method described in section 1272(a)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code.  The precise means of applying that method is uncertain in various respects, however.  See “Grantor Trusts—Taxation of Owners of Grantor Trust Fractional Interest Certificates—General.”

Taxation of Owners of Grantor Trust Strip Certificates.  The stripped coupon rules of section 1286 of the Internal Revenue Code will apply to the grantor trust strip certificates.  Except as described above under “—Grantor Trusts—Taxation of Owners of Grantor Trust Fractional Interest Certificates—If Stripped Bond Rules Apply,” no regulations or published rulings under section 1286 of the Internal Revenue Code have been issued and some uncertainty exists as to how it will be applied to securities, such as the grantor trust strip certificates.  Accordingly, we recommend that you consult your tax advisors concerning the method to be used in reporting income or loss with respect to those certificates.

The Treasury regulations promulgated under the original discount rules do not apply to stripped coupons, although they provide general guidance as to how the original issue discount sections of the Internal Revenue Code will be applied.

Under the stripped coupon rules, it appears that original issue discount will be required to be accrued in each month on the grantor trust strip certificates based on a constant yield method.  In effect, you would include as interest income in each month an amount equal to the product of your adjusted basis in the grantor trust strip certificate at the beginning of that month and the yield of the grantor trust strip certificate to you.  This yield would be calculated based on:

● the price paid for that grantor trust strip certificate by you, and

● the projected payments remaining to be made on that grantor trust strip certificate at the time of the purchase, plus

● an allocable portion of the projected servicing fees and expenses to be paid with respect to the underlying  mortgage loans.

Such yield will accrue based generally on the method described in section 1272(a)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code.  The precise means of applying that method is uncertain in various respects, however.  See “Grantor Trusts—Taxation of Owners of Grantor Trust Fractional Interest Certificates—General.”

If the method for computing original issue discount under section 1272(a)(6) results in a negative amount of original issue discount as to any accrual period with respect to a grantor trust strip certificate, the amount of original issue discount allocable to that accrual period will be zero.  That is, no current deduction of the negative amount will be allowed to you.  You will instead only be permitted to offset that negative amount against future positive original issue discount, if any, attributable to that certificate.  Although not free from doubt, it is possible that you may be permitted to deduct a loss to the extent his or her basis in the certificate exceeds the maximum

186

amount of payments you could ever receive with respect to that certificate.  However, the loss may be a capital loss, which is limited in its deductibility.  The foregoing considerations are particularly relevant to grantor trust certificates with no, or disproportionately small, amounts of principal, which can have negative yields under circumstances that are not default related.  See “Risk Factors—The Investment Performance of Your Offered Certificates Will Depend Upon Payments, Defaults and Losses on the Underlying Mortgage Loans; and Those Payments, Defaults and Losses May Be Highly Unpredictable” above.

The accrual of income on the grantor trust strip certificates will be significantly slower using a prepayment assumption than if yield is computed assuming no prepayments.  In the absence of statutory or administrative clarification, we currently expect that information returns or reports to the IRS and certificateholders will be based on:

● the prepayment assumption we will disclose in the related prospectus supplement, and

● a constant yield computed using a representative initial offering price for each class of certificates.

However, neither we nor any other person will make any representation that—

● the mortgage loans in any of our trusts will in fact prepay at a rate conforming to the prepayment assumption or at any other rate or

● the prepayment assumption will not be challenged by the IRS on audit.

We recommend that prospective purchasers of the grantor trust strip certificates consult their tax advisors regarding the use of the prepayment assumption.

Certificateholders also should bear in mind that the use of a representative initial offering price will mean that the information returns or reports, even if otherwise accepted as accurate by the IRS, will in any event be accurate only as to the initial certificateholders of each series who bought at that price.

The characterizations of grantor trust strip certificates discussed above are not the only possible interpretations of the applicable Internal Revenue Code provisions. For example, a holder of a grantor trust strip certificate may be treated as the owner of (i) one installment obligation consisting of the grantor trust strip certificate’s pro rata share of the payments attributable to principal on each mortgage loan and a second installment obligation consisting of the grantor trust strip certificate’s pro rata share of the payments attributable to interest on each mortgage loan, (ii) as many stripped bonds or stripped coupons as there are scheduled payments of principal and/or interest on each mortgage loan or (iii) a separate installment obligation for each mortgage loan, representing the grantor trust strip certificate’s pro rata share of payments of principal and/or interest to be made with respect to the grantor trust strip certificate. Alternatively, the holder of one or more classes of grantor trust strip certificates may be treated as the owner of a pro rata fractional undivided interest in each mortgage loan to the extent that the grantor trust strip certificate, or classes of grantor trust strip certificates in the aggregate, represent the same pro rata portion of principal and interest on each mortgage loan, and a stripped bond or stripped coupon (as the case may be), treated as an installment obligation or contingent payment obligation, as to the remainder. Treasury regulations regarding original issue discount on stripped obligations make the foregoing interpretations less likely to be applicable. The preamble to these regulations states that they are premised on the assumption that an aggregation approach is appropriate for determining whether original issue discount on a stripped bond or stripped coupon is de minimis, and solicits comments on appropriate rules for aggregating stripped bonds and stripped coupons under section 1286 of the Internal Revenue Code.

187

Because of these possible varying characterizations of grantor trust strip certificates and the resultant differing treatment of income recognition, holders of grantor trust strip certificates are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the proper treatment of grantor trust strip certificates for federal income tax purposes.

Stripped ARM Obligations. The OID regulations do not address the treatment of instruments, such as grantor trust certificates, which represent interests in adjustable rate mortgage loans.  Additionally, the IRS has not issued guidance under the Internal Revenue Code’s coupon stripping rules with respect to such instruments.  In the absence of any authority, the trustee or other applicable party will report OID on grantor trust certificates attributable to adjustable rate mortgage loans (“Stripped ARM Obligations”) to holders in a manner it believes is consistent with the rules described above and with the OID regulations.  In general, application of these rules may require inclusion of income on a Stripped ARM Obligation in advance of the receipt of cash attributable to such income.  Further, the addition of deferred interest (i.e., interest deferred by reason of negative amortization) to the principal balance of an adjustable rate mortgage loan may require the inclusion of such amount in the income of the grantor trust certificateholder when such amount accrues.  Furthermore, the addition of deferred interest to the grantor trust certificate’s principal balance will result in additional income (including possibly OID income) to the grantor trust certificateholder over the remaining life of such grantor trust certificates.

Because the treatment of Stripped ARM Obligations is uncertain, investors are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding how income will be includible with respect to such certificates.

Sales of Grantor Trust Certificates.  Any gain or loss recognized on the sale or exchange of a grantor trust certificate by an investor who holds that certificate as a capital asset, will be capital gain or loss, except as described below in this “—Sales of Grantor Trust Certificates” subsection.  The amount recognized equals the difference between:

● the amount realized on the sale or exchange of a grantor trust certificate, and

● its adjusted basis.

The adjusted basis of a grantor trust certificate generally will equal:

● its cost, increased by

● any income reported by the seller, including original issue discount and market discount income, and reduced, but not below zero, by

● any and all previously reported losses, amortized premium, and payments with respect to that grantor trust certificate.

As of the date of this prospectus, the Internal Revenue Code provides for lower rates as to long-term capital gains than those applicable to the short-term capital gains and ordinary income realized or received by individuals.  No similar rate differential exists for corporations.  In addition, the distinction between a capital gain or loss and ordinary income or loss remains relevant for other purposes.

Gain or loss from the sale of a grantor trust certificate may be partially or wholly ordinary and not capital in some circumstances.  Gain attributable to accrued and unrecognized market discount will be treated as ordinary income.  Gain or loss recognized by banks and other financial institutions subject to section 582(c) of the Internal Revenue Code will be treated as ordinary income.

Furthermore, a portion of any gain that might otherwise be capital gain may be treated as ordinary income to the extent that the grantor trust certificate is held as part of a “conversion transaction” within the meaning of section 1258 of the Internal Revenue Code.  A conversion transaction generally is one in which the taxpayer has

188

taken two or more positions in the same or similar property that reduce or eliminate market risk, if substantially all of the taxpayer’s return is attributable to the time value of the taxpayer’s net investment in the transaction.  The amount of gain realized in a conversion transaction that is recharacterized as ordinary income generally will not exceed the amount of interest that would have accrued on the taxpayer’s net investment at 120% of the appropriate applicable Federal rate at the time the taxpayer enters into the conversion transaction, subject to appropriate reduction for prior inclusion of interest and other ordinary income items from the transaction.

Section 1259 of the Internal Revenue Code requires the recognition of gain upon the constructive sale of an appreciated financial position.  A constructive sale of an appreciated financial position occurs if a taxpayer enters into a transaction or series of transactions that have the effect of substantially eliminating the taxpayer’s risk of loss and opportunity for gain with respect to the financial instrument.  Debt instruments that—

● entitle the holder to a specified principal amount,

● pay interest at a fixed or variable rate, and

● are not convertible into the stock of the issuer or a related party,

cannot be the subject of a constructive sale for this purpose. Because most grantor trust certificates meet this exception, section 1259 will not apply to most grantor trust certificates.  However, some grantor trust certificates have no, or a disproportionately small amount of, principal and these certificates can be the subject of a constructive sale.

Finally, a taxpayer may elect to have net capital gain taxed at ordinary income rates rather than capital gains rates in order to include the net capital gain in total net investment income for the relevant taxable year.  This election would be done for purposes of the rule that limits the deduction of interest on indebtedness incurred to purchase or carry property held for investment to a taxpayer’s net investment income.

Investors that recognize a loss on a sale or exchange of grantor trust certificates for federal income tax purposes in excess of certain threshold amounts should consult their tax advisors as to the need to file IRS Form 8886 (disclosing certain potential tax shelters) on their federal income tax returns.

Grantor Trust Reporting.  Unless otherwise provided in the related prospectus supplement, the related tax administrator will furnish or make readily available through electronic means to each holder of a grantor trust certificate with each payment a statement setting forth the amount of the payment allocable to principal on the underlying mortgage loans and to interest on those loans at the related pass-through rate.  In addition, the related tax administrator will furnish, within a reasonable time after the end of each calendar year, to each person or entity that was the holder of a grantor trust certificate at any time during that year, information regarding:

● the amount of servicing compensation received by a master servicer or special servicer, and

● all other customary factual information the reporting party deems necessary or desirable to enable holders of the related grantor trust certificates to prepare their tax returns.

The reporting party will furnish comparable information to the IRS as and when required by law to do so.

Because the rules for accruing discount and amortizing premium with respect to grantor trust certificates are uncertain in various respects, there is no assurance the IRS will agree with the information reports of those items of income and expense.  Moreover, those information reports, even if otherwise accepted as accurate by the IRS, will in any event be accurate only as to the initial certificateholders that bought their certificates at the representative initial offering price used in preparing the reports.

189

The applicable Treasury regulations establish a reporting framework for interests in “widely held fixed investment trusts” and place the responsibility of reporting on the person in the ownership chain who holds an interest for a beneficial owner.  A widely-held fixed investment trust is defined as an arrangement classified as a “trust” under Treasury regulation section 301.7701-4(c) in which any interest is held by a middleman, which includes, but is not limited to:

● a custodian of a person’s account,

● a nominee, and

● a broker holding an interest for a customer in street name.

The trustee, or its designated agent, is required to calculate and provide information to requesting persons with respect to the trust in accordance with these regulations.  The trustee (or its designated agent), or the applicable middleman (in the case of interests held through a middleman), is required to file information returns with the IRS and provide tax information statements to holders in accordance with these regulations.

Backup Withholding.  In general, the rules described under “—REMICs—Backup Withholding with Respect to REMIC Certificates” above will also apply to grantor trust certificates.

Foreign Investors.  In general, the discussion with respect to REMIC regular certificates under “—REMICs—Foreign Investors in REMIC Certificates” above applies to grantor trust certificates.  However, unless we otherwise specify in the related prospectus supplement, grantor trust certificates will be eligible for exemption from U.S. withholding tax, subject to the conditions described in the discussion above, only to the extent the related mortgage loans were originated after July 18, 1984.

To the extent that interest on a grantor trust certificate would be exempt under sections 871(h)(1) and 881(c) of the Internal Revenue Code from United States withholding tax, and the certificate is not held in connection with a certificateholder’s trade or business in the United States, the certificate will not be subject to United States estate taxes in the estate of a nonresident alien individual.

FATCA.  In general, the rules described under “—REMICs—FATCA” above will also apply to grantor trust certificates.

3.8% Medicare Tax on “Net Investment Income”.  In general, the rules described under “—REMICs—3.8% Medicare Tax on “Net Investment Income” above will also apply to grantor trust certificates.

Tax Return Disclosure and Investor List Requirements

Treasury regulations directed at potentially abusive tax shelter activity appear to apply to transactions not conventionally regarded as tax shelters.  The regulations require taxpayers to report certain disclosures on IRS Form 8886 if they participate in a “reportable transaction.” Organizers and sellers of the transaction are required to maintain records including investor lists containing identifying information and to furnish those records to the IRS upon demand.  A transaction may be a “reportable transaction” based upon any of several indicia, one or more of which may be present with respect to your investment in the certificates.  There are significant penalties for failure to comply with these disclosure requirements.  Investors in certificates are encouraged to consult their own tax advisers concerning any possible disclosure obligation with respect to their investment, and should be aware that we and other participants in the transaction intend to comply with such disclosure and investor list maintenance requirements as we and they determine apply to us and them with respect to the transaction.

190

STATE AND OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES

In addition to the federal income tax consequences described in “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences,” potential investors should consider the state and local, and any other, tax consequences concerning the offered certificates.  State and local tax law may differ substantially from the corresponding federal tax law, and the discussion above does not purport to describe any aspect of the tax laws of any state, local or other jurisdiction.  Therefore, we recommend that prospective investors consult their tax advisors with respect to the various tax consequences of investments in the offered certificates.

ERISA CONSIDERATIONS

General

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, imposes various requirements on—

● ERISA Plans, and

● persons that are fiduciaries with respect to ERISA Plans,

in connection with the investment of the assets of an ERISA Plan.  For purposes of this discussion, ERISA Plans include corporate pension and profit sharing plans as well as separate accounts and collective investment funds, including as applicable, insurance company general accounts, in which other ERISA Plans are invested.

Governmental plans and, if they have not made an election under Section 410(d) of the Internal Revenue Code, church plans are not subject to ERISA requirements.  However, those plans may be subject to provisions of other applicable federal or state law that are materially similar to the provisions of ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code discussed in this section.  Any of those plans which is qualified and exempt from taxation under Sections 401(a) and 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, moreover, is subject to the prohibited transaction rules in Section 503 of the Internal Revenue Code.

ERISA imposes general fiduciary requirements on a fiduciary that is investing the assets of an ERISA Plan, including—

● investment prudence and diversification, and

● compliance with the investing ERISA Plan’s governing documents.

Section 406 of ERISA also prohibits a broad range of transactions involving the assets of an ERISA Plan and a Party in Interest with respect to that ERISA Plan, unless a statutory or administrative exemption applies.  Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code contains similar prohibitions applicable to transactions involving the assets of a Plan subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code.  For purposes of this discussion, Plans include ERISA Plans as well as individual retirement accounts, Keogh plans and other plans subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code.

The types of transactions between Plans and Parties in Interest that are prohibited include:

● sales, exchanges or leases of property;

● loans or other extensions of credit; and

● the furnishing of goods and services.

191

Parties in Interest that participate in a prohibited transaction may be subject to an excise tax imposed under Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code or a penalty imposed under Section 502(i) of ERISA, unless a statutory or administrative exemption is available.  In addition, the persons involved in the prohibited transaction may have to cancel the transaction and pay an amount to the affected Plan for any losses realized by that Plan or profits realized by those persons.  In addition, an individual retirement account involved in the prohibited transaction may be disqualified which would result in adverse tax consequences to the owner of the account.

Plan Asset Regulations

A Plan’s investment in offered certificates may cause the underlying mortgage assets and other assets of the related trust to be deemed assets of that Plan.  The Plan Asset Regulations provides that when a Plan acquires an equity interest in an entity, the assets of that Plan include both that equity interest and an undivided interest in each of the underlying assets of the entity, unless an exception applies.  One exception is that the equity participation in the entity by benefit plan investors, which include employee benefit plans subject to Part 4 of Title I of ERISA, any plan to which Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code applies and any entity whose underlying assets include plan assets by reason of the plan’s investment in such entity, is not significant.  The equity participation by benefit plan investors will be significant on any date if 25% or more of the value of any class of equity interests in the entity is held by benefit plan investors.  The percentage owned by benefit plan investors is determined by excluding the investments of the following persons (other than benefit plan investors):

1. those with discretionary authority or control over the assets of the entity,

2. those who provide investment advice directly or indirectly for a fee with respect to the assets of the entity, and

3. those who are affiliates of the persons described in the preceding clauses 1. and 2.

In the case of one of our trusts, investments by us, by an underwriter, by the related trustee, the related master servicer, the related special servicer or any other party with discretionary authority over the related trust assets, or by the affiliates of these persons, will be excluded.

A fiduciary of an investing Plan is any person who—

● has discretionary authority or control over the management or disposition of the assets of that Plan, or

● provides investment advice with respect to the assets of that Plan for a fee.

If the mortgage and other assets included in one of our trusts are Plan assets, then any party exercising management or discretionary control regarding those assets, such as the related trustee, master servicer or special servicer, or affiliates of any of these parties, may be—

● deemed to be a fiduciary with respect to the investing Plan, and

● subject to the fiduciary responsibility provisions of ERISA.

In addition, if the mortgage and other assets included in one of our trusts are Plan assets, then the operation of that trust may involve prohibited transactions under ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code.  For example, if a borrower with respect to a mortgage loan in that trust is a Party in Interest to an investing Plan, then the purchase by that Plan of offered certificates evidencing interests in that trust could be a prohibited loan between that Plan and the Party in Interest.

192

The Plan Asset Regulations provide that where a Plan purchases a “guaranteed governmental mortgage pool certificate,” the assets of that Plan include the certificate but do not include any of the mortgages underlying the certificate.  The Plan Asset Regulations include in the definition of a “guaranteed governmental mortgage pool certificate” some certificates issued and/or guaranteed by Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae or Farmer Mac.  Accordingly, even if these types of mortgaged-backed securities were deemed to be assets of a Plan, the underlying mortgages would not be treated as assets of that Plan.  Private label mortgage participations, mortgage pass-through certificates or other mortgage-backed securities are not “guaranteed governmental mortgage pool certificates” within the meaning of the Plan Asset Regulations.

In addition, the acquisition or holding of offered certificates by or on behalf of a Plan could give rise to a prohibited transaction if we or the related trustee, master servicer or special servicer or any related underwriter, sub-servicer, tax administrator, manager, borrower or obligor under any credit enhancement mechanism, or one of their affiliates, is or becomes a Party in Interest with respect to an investing Plan.

If you are the fiduciary of a Plan, you are encouraged consult your counsel and review the ERISA discussion in the related prospectus supplement before purchasing any offered certificates.

Prohibited Transaction Exemptions

If you are a Plan fiduciary, then, in connection with your deciding whether to purchase any of the offered certificates on behalf of, or with assets of, a Plan, you should consider the availability of one of the following prohibited transaction class exemptions issued by the U.S. Department of Labor:

● Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption 90-1, which exempts particular transactions between insurance company separate accounts and Parties in Interest;

● Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption 91-38, which exempts particular transactions between bank collective investment funds and Parties in Interest;

● Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption 84-14, which exempts particular transactions effected on behalf of a Plan by a “qualified professional asset manager;”

● Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption 95-60, which exempts particular transactions between insurance company general accounts and Parties in Interest; and

● Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption 96-23, which exempts particular transactions effected on behalf of an ERISA Plan by an “in-house asset manager.”

We cannot provide any assurance that any of these class exemptions will apply with respect to any particular investment by or on behalf of a Plan in any class of offered certificates.  Furthermore, even if any of them were deemed to apply, that particular class exemption may not apply to all transactions that could occur in connection with the investment.  The prospectus supplement with respect to the offered certificates of any series may contain additional information regarding the availability of other exemptions, with respect to those certificates.

Underwriter Exemption

The Department of Labor has granted to certain underwriters individual administrative exemptions from application of certain of the prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code.  Unless otherwise specified in the related prospectus supplement, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. will be the sole underwriter or the lead or co-lead managing underwriter in each underwritten offering of certificates made by this prospectus.  The U.S. Department of Labor issued the Underwriter Exemption to a predecessor in interest to

193

Citigroup Global Markets Inc.  Subject to the satisfaction of the conditions specified in the Underwriter Exemption, this exemption generally exempts from the application of the prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code, various transactions relating to, among other things—

● the servicing and operation of some mortgage assets pools, such as the types of mortgage asset pools that will be included in our trusts, and

● the purchase, sale and holding of some certificates evidencing interests in those pools that are underwritten by Citigroup Global Markets Inc. or any person affiliated with Citigroup Global Markets Inc., such as particular classes of the offered certificates.

Whether the conditions of the Underwriter Exemption will be satisfied as to the offered certificates of any particular class will depend on the facts and circumstances at the time the Plan acquires certificates of that class.  The related prospectus supplement will state whether the Underwriter Exemption, as amended, is or may be available with respect to any offered certificates.

Insurance Company General Accounts

Section 401(c) of ERISA provides that the fiduciary and prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code do not apply to transactions involving an insurance company general account where the assets of the general account are not Plan assets.  A Department of Labor regulation issued under Section 401(c) of ERISA provides guidance for determining, in cases where insurance policies supported by an insurer’s general account are issued to or for the benefit of a Plan on or before December 31, 1998, which general account assets are ERISA Plan assets.  That regulation generally provides that, if the specified requirements are satisfied with respect to insurance policies issued on or before December 31, 1998, the assets of an insurance company general account will not be Plan assets.

Any assets of an insurance company general account which support insurance policies issued to a Plan after December 31, 1998, or issued to a Plan on or before December 31, 1998 for which the insurance company does not comply with the requirements set forth in the Department of Labor regulation under Section 401(c) of ERISA, may be treated as Plan assets.  In addition, because Section 401(c) of ERISA and the regulation issued under Section 401(c) of ERISA do not relate to insurance company separate accounts, separate account assets are still treated as Plan assets, invested in the separate account.  If you are an insurance company and are contemplating the investment of general account assets in offered certificates, you are encouraged consult your legal counsel as to the applicability of Section 401(c) of ERISA.

Ineligible Purchasers

Even if an exemption is otherwise available, certificates in a particular offering generally may not be purchased with the assets of a Plan that is sponsored by or maintained by an underwriter, the depositor, the trustee, the related trust, the master servicer, the special servicer or any of their respective affiliates.  Offered certificates generally may not be purchased with the assets of a Plan if the depositor, the trustee, the related trust fund, a master servicer, the special servicer, a mortgage loan seller, or any of their respective affiliates or any employees thereof: (a) has investment discretion with respect to the investment of such Plan assets; or (b) has authority or responsibility to give or regularly gives investment advice with respect to such Plan assets for a fee, pursuant to an agreement or understanding that such advice will serve as a primary basis for investment decisions with respect to such Plan assets and that such advice will be based on the particular investment needs of the Plan.  A party with the discretion, authority or responsibility is described in clause (a) or (b) of the preceding sentence is a fiduciary with respect to a Plan, and any such purchase might result in a “prohibited transaction” under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code.

194

Consultation with Counsel

If you are a fiduciary for or any other person investing assets of a Plan and you intend to purchase offered certificates on behalf of or with assets of that Plan, you should:

● consider your general fiduciary obligations under ERISA, and

● consult with your legal counsel as to—

1. the potential applicability of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code to that investment, and

2. the availability of any prohibited transaction exemption in connection with that investment.

Tax Exempt Investors

A Plan that is exempt from federal income taxation under Section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code will be subject to federal income taxation to the extent that its income is “unrelated business taxable income” within the meaning of Section 512 of the Internal Revenue Code.  All excess inclusions of a REMIC allocated to a REMIC residual certificate held by a tax-exempt Plan will be considered unrelated business taxable income and will be subject to federal income tax.

See “Material Federal Income Tax Consequences—REMICs—Taxation of Owners of REMIC Residual Certificates—Excess Inclusions” in this prospectus.

LEGAL INVESTMENT

If and to the extent specified in the related prospectus supplement, certain classes of the offered certificates of any series will constitute mortgage related securities for purposes of the Secondary Mortgage Market Enhancement Act of 1984, as amended (“SMMEA”).  Generally, the only classes of offered certificates that will qualify as “mortgage related securities” will be those that:  (1) are rated in one of two highest rating categories by at least one NRSRO; and (2) are part of a series evidencing interests in a trust fund consisting of loans originated by certain types of originators specified in SMMEA and secured by first liens on real estate.

Pursuant to Section 939(e) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which amended SMMEA, the SEC is required to establish new creditworthiness standards in substitution for the current ratings test in SMMEA, effective July 21, 2012.  As of the date of this prospectus, however, the SEC has neither proposed nor adopted a rule establishing such new creditworthiness standards for purposes of SMMEA. Nevertheless, the SEC has issued a transitional interpretation (Release No. 34-67448 (effective July 20, 2012)), which provides that, until such time as final rules establishing new standards of creditworthiness become effective, the standard of creditworthiness for purposes of the definition of the term “mortgage related security” is a security that is rated in one of the two highest rating categories by at least one NRSRO. Depending on the standards of creditworthiness that are ultimately established by the SEC, it is possible that certain classes of offered certificates offered and sold prior to effectiveness of a new rule (including prior to July 21, 2012) that are specified to be “mortgage related securities” for purposes of SMMEA in the applicable prospectus supplement, may no longer qualify as such as of the time such new rule is effective, and that future classes of offered certificates may not qualify, either.

Further, the appropriate characterization of the offered certificates under various legal investment restrictions, and thus the ability of investors subject to these restrictions to purchase the offered certificates, may be subject to significant interpretive uncertainties.

195

Except as may be specified in the related prospectus supplement with regard to the status of certain classes of offered certificates as “mortgage related securities” for purposes of SMMEA, no representations are made as to the proper characterization of any class of offered certificates for legal investment, financial institution regulatory or other purposes, or as to the ability of particular investors to purchase any class of offered certificates under applicable legal investment restrictions.  Further, any rating of a class of offered certificates below an “investment grade” rating (i.e., lower than the top four rating categories) by an NRSRO engaged to rate that class or issuing an unsolicited rating, and whether initially or as a result of a ratings downgrade, may adversely affect the ability of an investor to purchase or retain, or otherwise impact the regulatory characteristics of, that class of certificates.  These uncertainties (and any unfavorable future determinations concerning the legal investment or financial institution regulatory characteristics of the offered certificates) may adversely affect the liquidity and market value of the offered certificates.  Further, any ratings downgrade of a class of offered certificates below an “investment grade” rating by an NRSRO may affect the ability of an investor to purchase or retain, or otherwise impact the regulatory characteristics of, those certificates.

Accordingly, if your investment activities are subject to legal investment laws and regulations, regulatory capital requirements or review by regulatory authorities, you are encouraged consult with your legal advisors in determining whether and to what extent:  (a) the offered certificates of any class or series constitute legal investments or are subject to investment, capital or other regulatory restrictions; and (b) if applicable, SMMEA has been overridden in any jurisdiction relevant to you.

USE OF PROCEEDS

Unless otherwise specified in the related prospectus supplement, the net proceeds to be received from the sale of the offered certificates of any series will be applied by us to the purchase of assets for the related trust or will be used by us to cover expenses related to that purchase and the issuance of those certificates.  We expect to sell the offered certificates from time to time, but the timing and amount of offerings of those certificates will depend on a number of factors, including the volume of mortgage assets acquired by us, prevailing interest rates, availability of funds and general market conditions.

METHOD OF DISTRIBUTION

The certificates offered by this prospectus and the related prospectus supplements will be offered in series through one or more of the methods described in the next paragraph.  The prospectus supplement prepared for the offered certificates of each series will describe the method of offering being utilized for those certificates and will state the net proceeds to us from the sale of those certificates.

We intend that offered certificates will be offered through the following methods from time to time. We further intend that offerings may be made concurrently through more than one of these methods or that an offering of the offered certificates of a particular series may be made through a combination of two or more of these methods.  The methods are as follows:

1. by negotiated firm commitment or best efforts underwriting and public offering by one or more underwriters specified in the related prospectus supplement;

2. by placements by us with institutional investors through dealers; and

3. by direct placements by us with institutional investors.

In addition, if specified in the related prospectus supplement, the offered certificates of a series may be offered in whole or in part to the seller of the mortgage assets that would back those certificates.  Furthermore, the

196

related trust assets for any series of offered certificates may include other securities, the offering of which was registered under the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.

If underwriters are used in a sale of any offered certificates, other than in connection with an underwriting on a best efforts basis, the offered certificates will be acquired by the underwriters for their own account.  These certificates may be resold from time to time in one or more transactions, including negotiated transactions, at fixed public offering prices or at varying prices to be determined at the time of sale or at the time of commitment therefor.  Such underwriters may be broker dealers affiliated with us or other parties to the particular offering, whose identities and relationships to us or such other parties will be as set forth in the related prospectus supplement.  The managing underwriter or underwriters with respect to the offer and sale of offered certificates of a particular series will be described on the cover of the prospectus supplement relating to the series and the members of the underwriting syndicate, if any, will be named in the relevant prospectus supplement.

Underwriters may receive compensation from us or from purchasers of the offered certificates in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions.  Underwriters and dealers participating in the payment of the offered certificates may be deemed to be underwriters in connection with those certificates.  In addition, any discounts or commissions received by them from us and any profit on the resale of those offered certificates by them may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act.

It is anticipated that the underwriting agreement pertaining to the sale of the offered certificates of any series will provide that—

● the obligations of the underwriters will be subject to various conditions precedent,

● the underwriters will be obligated to purchase all the certificates if any are purchased, other than in connection with an underwriting on a best efforts basis, and

● in limited circumstances, we will indemnify the several underwriters and each person, if any, that controls an underwriter within the meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act, and the underwriters will indemnify us and each person, if any, that controls us within the meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act, against civil liabilities relating to disclosure in our registration statement, this prospectus or any of the related prospectus supplements, including liabilities under the Securities Act, or will contribute to payments required to be made with respect to any liabilities.

The prospectus supplement with respect to any series offered by placements through dealers will contain information regarding the nature of the offering and any agreements to be entered into between us and purchasers of offered certificates of that series.

We anticipate that the offered certificates will be sold primarily to institutional investors.  Purchasers of offered certificates, including dealers, may, depending on the facts and circumstances of the purchases, be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act, in connection with reoffers and sales by them of offered certificates.  Holders of offered certificates are encouraged to consult with their legal advisors in this regard prior to any reoffer or sale.

If specified in the prospectus supplement relating to a series of offered certificates, we or any of our affiliates or any third party may purchase some or all of one or more classes of offered certificates of that series from the underwriter or underwriters at a price specified or described in the prospectus supplement.  This selling certificateholder may then, from time to time, offer and sell, pursuant to this prospectus and a related prospectus supplement, some or all of the offered certificates it purchased in one of the following ways: (i) directly; (ii) through one or more underwriters to be designated at the time of the offering of the certificates; or (iii) through dealers acting as agent and/or principal.  Any of these offerings may be restricted in the matter specified in the

197

related prospectus supplement.  These transactions may be effected at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at negotiated prices or at fixed prices.  The underwriters and dealers participating in the purchaser’s offering of such certificates may receive compensation in the form of underwriting discounts or commissions from the selling certificateholder and these dealers may receive commissions from the investors purchasing such certificates for whom they may act as agent (which discounts or commissions will not exceed those customary in those types of transactions).  Any dealer that participates in the distribution of these certificates will be an “underwriter” within the meaning of the Securities Act, and any commissions and discounts received by a dealer and any profit on the resale of these certificates by a dealer will be underwriting discounts and commissions under the Securities Act.

Unless otherwise specified in the related prospectus supplement, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. will be the sole underwriter or the lead or co-lead managing underwriter in each underwritten offering of certificates made by this prospectus.  Citigroup Global Markets Inc. is our affiliate and an affiliate of CGMRC.

LEGAL MATTERS

Unless otherwise specified in the related prospectus supplement, particular legal matters in connection with the certificates of each series, including some federal income tax consequences, will be passed upon for us by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

A new trust will be formed with respect to each series of offered certificates.  None of those trusts will engage in any business activities or have any assets or obligations prior to the issuance of the related series of offered certificates.  Accordingly, no financial statements with respect to any trust will be included in this prospectus or in the related prospectus supplement.  We have determined that our financial statements will not be material to the offering of any offered certificates.

RATINGS

It is a condition to the issuance of any class of offered certificates that, at the time of issuance, at least one NRSRO has rated those certificates in one of its generic rating categories which signifies investment grade.  Typically, the four highest rating categories, within which there may be sub-categories or gradations indicating relative standing, signify investment grade. We will, in the related prospectus supplement or in a related free writing prospectus, with respect to each class of offered certificates, identify the applicable rating agency or agencies and specify the minimum rating(s) that must be assigned thereto.

Ratings on mortgage pass-through certificates address the likelihood of receipt by the holders of all payments of interest and/or principal to which they are entitled.  These ratings address the structural, legal and issuer-related aspects associated with the certificates, the nature of the underlying mortgage assets and the credit quality of any third-party credit enhancer.  The rating(s) on a class of offered certificates will not represent any assessment of—

● whether the price paid for those certificates is fair;

● whether those certificates are a suitable investment for any particular investor;

● the tax attributes of those certificates or of the related trust;

● the yield to maturity or, if they have principal balances, the average life of those certificates;

● the likelihood or frequency of prepayments of principal on the underlying mortgage loans;

198

● the degree to which the amount or frequency of prepayments on the underlying mortgage loans might differ from those originally anticipated;

● whether or to what extent the interest payable on those certificates may be reduced in connection with interest shortfalls resulting from the timing of voluntary prepayments;

● the likelihood that any amounts other than interest  at the related mortgage interest rates and principal will be received with respect to the underlying mortgage loans; or

● if those certificates provide solely or primarily for payments of interest, whether the holders, despite receiving all payments of interest to which they are entitled, would ultimately recover their initial investments in those certificates.

A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization.  Each security rating should be evaluated independently of any other security rating.

199

GLOSSARY

The following capitalized terms will have the respective meanings assigned to them in this “Glossary” section whenever they are used in this prospectus.

“ADA” means the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended.

“Bankruptcy Code” means Title 11 of the United States Code.

“CERCLA” means the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended.

“CGMRC” means Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.

“Clearstream” means Clearstream Banking, société anonyme.

“Code” or “Internal Revenue Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

“Committee Report” means the Conference Committee Report accompanying the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

“CPR” means an assumed constant rate of prepayment each month, which is expressed on a per annum basis, relative to the then outstanding principal balance of a pool of mortgage loans for the life of those loans.

“Depositor” means Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.

“Disqualified Organization” means:

● the United States,

● any State or political subdivision of the United States,

● any foreign government,

● any international organization,

● any agency or instrumentality of the foregoing, except for instrumentalities described in section 168(h)(2)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code or Freddie Mac,

● any organization, other than a cooperative described in section 521 of the Internal Revenue Code, that is exempt from federal income tax, except if it is subject to the tax imposed by section 511 of the Internal Revenue Code, or

● any organization described in section 1381(a)(2)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code.

“DRA” means the Deficit Reduction Act of 2006.

“DTC” means The Depository Trust Company.

“Electing Large Partnership” means any partnership having more than 100 members during the preceding tax year which elects to apply simplified reporting provisions under the Internal Revenue Code, except for some service partnerships and commodity pools.

200

“Environmental Condition” means any condition or circumstance that (i) may pose an imminent or substantial endangerment to the human health or welfare or the environment, (ii) may result in a release or threatened release of any hazardous material or hazardous substance, or (iii) may give rise to any environmental claim or demand.

“EPA” means the Environmental Protection Agency.

“ERISA” means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

“ERISA Plan” means any employee benefit plan or other retirement plan that is subject to the fiduciary responsibility provisions of ERISA.

“ECSPLC” means Euroclear Clearance System Public Limited Company.

“Euroclear Operator” means Euroclear Bank, S.A./N.V., as operator of the Euroclear System, or any successor entity in that capacity.

“Euroclear Terms and Conditions” means the Terms and Conditions Governing Use of Euroclear and the related Operating Procedures of the Euroclear System and, to the extent that it applies to the operation of the Euroclear System, Belgian law.

“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

“Fannie Mae” means the Federal National Mortgage Association.

“Farmer Mac” means the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation.

“FDIC” means the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

“Financial Intermediary” means a brokerage firm, bank, thrift institution or other financial intermediary that maintains an account of a beneficial owner of securities.

“Freddie Mac” means the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.

“Ginnie Mae” means the Government National Mortgage Association.

“Governing Document” means the pooling and servicing agreement or other similar agreement or collection of agreements, which governs the issuance of a series of offered certificates.

“I.R.C. Plan” means a plan, arrangement or account that is subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code, including individual retirement accounts and certain Keogh plans.

“IRS” means the Internal Revenue Service.

“Lender Liability Act” means the Asset Conservation Lender Liability and Deposit Insurance Act of 1996, as amended.

“Net Income From Foreclosure Property” means income from foreclosure property other than qualifying rents and other qualifying income for a REIT.

“NCUA” means the National Credit Union Administration.

201

“NRSRO” means a nationally recognized statistical rating organization within the meaning of Section 3(a)(62) of the Exchange Act.

“OCC” means the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

“OID” means original issue discount.

“OTS” means the Office of Thrift Supervision.

“Party in Interest” means any person that is a “party in interest” within the meaning of ERISA or a “disqualified person” within the meaning of Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code.

“Pass-Through Entity” means any:

● regulated investment company,

● real estate investment trust,

● trust,

● partnership, or

● other entity described in section 860E(e)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code.

“Plan” means an ERISA Plan or an I.R.C. Plan.

“Plan Asset Regulations” means Section 2510.3-101 of the regulations of the U.S. Department of Labor promulgated under ERISA, as modified by Section 3(42) of ERISA, describing what constitutes the assets of a Plan.

“PTE” means a Prohibited Transaction Exemption issued by the U.S. Department of Labor.

“RCRA” means the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.

“REIT” means a real estate investment trust within the meaning of section 856(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

“Relief Act” means the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act.

“REMIC” means a real estate mortgage investment conduit, within the meaning of, and formed in accordance with, the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and sections 860A through 860G of the Internal Revenue Code.

“Safe Harbor Regulations” means the final Treasury regulations issued on July 18, 2002.

“SEC” means the Securities and Exchange Commission.

“Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended

“SMMEA” means the Secondary Mortgage Market Enhancement Act of 1984, as amended.

“SPA” means standard prepayment assumption.

“Title V” means Title V of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980.

202

“Treasury Department” means the United States Department of the Treasury.

“UCC” means, for any jurisdiction, the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in that jurisdiction.

“Underwriter Exemption”means PTE 91-23, as amended by PTE 2013-08.

“U.S. Person” means:

● a citizen or resident of the United States;

● a corporation, partnership or other entity created or organized in, or under the laws of, the United States, any state or the District of Columbia;

● an estate whose income from sources without the United States is includible in gross income for United States federal income tax purposes regardless of its connection with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States; or

● a trust as to which—

1. a court in the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust, and

2. one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.

In addition, to the extent provided in the Treasury Regulations, a trust will be a U.S. Person if it was in existence on August 20, 1996 and it elected to be treated as a U.S. Person.

“USA Patriot Act” means the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001.

203

(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

No dealer, salesperson or other person is authorized to give any information or to represent anything not contained in this prospectus and prospectus supplement. You must not rely on any unauthorized information or representations. This prospectus and prospectus supplement is an offer to sell only the certificates offered hereby, but only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information contained in this prospectus and prospectus supplement is current only as of its date.			$879,413,000 (Approximate) Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-GC33 (as Issuing Entity) Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc. (as Depositor) Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-GC33
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Prospectus Supplement
Certificate Summary		S-13
Summary		S-15
Risk Factors		S-65
Description of the Mortgage Pool		S-110
Transaction Parties		S-185
Description of the Offered Certificates		S-244
Yield, Prepayment and Maturity Considerations		S-271
The Pooling and Servicing Agreement		S-285
Use of Proceeds		S-347
Material Federal Income Tax Consequences		S-348
State and Other Tax Considerations		S-351
ERISA Considerations		S-352
Legal Investment		S-356
Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans		S-357
Ratings		S-358		Class A-1	$	31,785,000
Plan of Distribution (Underwriter Conflicts of Interest)		S-360		Class A-2	$	15,217,000
Legal Matters		S-361		Class A-3	$	220,000,000
Index of Certain Defined Terms		S-362		Class A-4	$	331,456,000
				Class A-AB	$	72,484,000
Annex A    –	Statistical Characteristics of the Mortgage			Class X-A	$	718,866,000
	Loans	A-1		Class A-S	$	47,924,000
Annex B    –	Structural and Collateral Term Sheet	B-1		Class B	$	62,302,000
Annex C    –	Mortgage Pool Information	C-1		Class PEZ	$	152,160,000
Annex D    –	Form of Distribution Date Statement	D-1		Class C	$	41,934,000
Annex E-1 –	Sponsor Representations and			Class D	$	56,311,000
	Warranties	E-1-1		Class X-D	$	56,311,000
Annex E-2 –	Exceptions to Sponsor Representations
	and Warranties	E-2-1
Annex F    –	Class A-AB Scheduled Principal Balance
	Schedule	F-1
Annex G   –	Greylyn Business Park Mortgage Loan		PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT Co-Lead Managers and Joint Bookrunners Citigroup Goldman, Sachs & Co. Co-Manager Drexel Hamilton September 14, 2015
	Amortization Schedule	G-1
Prospectus
Table of Contents		2
Important Notice About the Information Presented in This
Prospectus and the Related Prospectus Supplement		6
Available Information		6
Summary of Prospectus		7
Risk Factors		19
Capitalized Terms Used in This Prospectus		79
The Trust Fund		79
Transaction Participants		88
Description of the Governing Documents		91
Description of the Certificates		103
Yield and Maturity Considerations		119
Description of Credit Support		125
Certain Legal Aspects of the Mortgage Loans		127
Material Federal Income Tax Consequences		148
State and Other Tax Consequences		191
ERISA Considerations		191
Legal Investment		195
Use of Proceeds		196
Method of Distribution		196
Legal Matters		198
Financial Information		198
Ratings		198
Glossary		200
Until 90 days after the date of this prospectus supplement, all dealers effecting transactions in the offered certificates, whether or not participating in this distribution, may be required to deliver a prospectus supplement and prospectus. This is in addition to the dealer’s obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriter and with respect to an unsold allotment or subscription.