10-K 1 good10-k2019123119.htm 10-K Document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
____________________________________________________________________
FORM 10-K
____________________________________________________________________
 (Mark One)
ý
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
OR
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission File Number 001-33097
____________________________________________________________________
GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
____________________________________________________________________
Maryland
 
02-0681276
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
1521 Westbranch Drive, Suite 100
McLean, Virginia
 
22102
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
(703) 287-5800
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each Class
 
Trading Symbol(s)
 
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
 
GOOD
 
Nasdaq Global Select Market
7.00% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share
 
GOODM
 
Nasdaq Global Select Market
6.625% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share
 
GOODN
 
Nasdaq Global Select Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    YES  ¨    NO  ý
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    YES  ¨    NO  ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  ý    NO  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    YES  ý    NO  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
 
¨
  
Accelerated filer
 
ý
Non-accelerated filer
 
¨  
  
Smaller reporting company
 
¨
 
 
 
 
Emerging growth company
 
¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12 b-2 of the Act).    YES  ¨    NO  ý
The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on June 28, 2019, based on the closing price on that date of $21.22 on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, was $642,256,405. For the purposes of calculating this amount only, all directors and executive officers of the Registrant and entities controlled by our directors and executive officers have been treated as affiliates. There were 33,925,708 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding as of February 12, 2020.
Documents Incorporated by Reference: Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement, to be filed no later than April 30, 2020, relating to the Registrant’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

1


GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORPORATION
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
PAGE
PART I
 
 
PART II
 
 
PART III
 
 
PART IV
 
 

3


Forward-Looking Statements

Our disclosure and analysis in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”), and the documents that are incorporated by reference herein, contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Ligation Reform Act of 1995 and include this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends concerning matters that are not historical facts. These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future events, including, among other things, discussion and analysis of our future financial condition, results of operations and funds from operations (“FFO”), our strategic plans and objectives, cost management, occupancy and leasing rates and trends, liquidity and ability to refinance our indebtedness as it matures, anticipated capital expenditures (and access to capital) required to complete projects, amounts of anticipated cash distributions to our stockholders in the future and other matters. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “will,” “should,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “may” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, though not all forward-looking statements contain these words. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. Statements regarding the following subjects, among others, are forward-looking by their nature:
 
•
future re-leasing efforts;
•
our business and financing strategy;
•
our ability to continue to implement our business plan;
•
pending and future transactions;
•
our projected operating results and anticipated acquisitions;
•
our ability to obtain future financing arrangements;
•
estimates relating to our future distributions;
•
our understanding of our competition and our ability to compete effectively;
•
future market and industry trends;
•
future interest and insurance rates;
•
estimates of our future operating expenses, including payments to our Adviser (as defined herein) under the terms of our Advisory Agreement (as defined herein);
•
the impact of technology on our operations and business, including the risk of cyber-attacks, cyber-liability or potential liability for breaches of our privacy or information security systems;
•
projected capital expenditures; and
•
future use of the proceeds of our Credit Facility (as defined herein), mortgage notes payable, future stock offerings and other future capital resources, if any.

Forward-looking statements involve inherent uncertainty and may ultimately prove to be incorrect or false. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Except as otherwise may be required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or actual operating results. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to:
 
•
general volatility of the capital markets and the market price of our common and preferred stock;
•
failure to maintain our qualification as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) and in the risk of changing laws that affect REITs;
•
risks associated with negotiation and consummation of pending and future transactions;
•
changes in our business strategy;
•
the adequacy of our cash reserves and working capital;
•
our failure to successfully integrate and operate acquired properties and operations;
•
defaults upon or non-renewal of leases by tenants;
•
decreased rental rates or increased vacancy rates;
•
the degree and nature of our competition, including other real estate investment companies;
•
availability, terms and deployment of capital, including the ability to maintain and borrow under our Credit Facility, arrange for long-term mortgages on our properties, secure additional long-term lines of credit and raise equity capital;
•
our Adviser’s ability to identify, hire and retain highly-qualified personnel;
•
changes in our industry or the general economy;

4

•
changes in real estate and zoning laws and increases in real property tax rates;
•
changes in governmental regulations, tax rates and similar matters;
•
the national and global political environment, including foreign relations and trading policies;
•
environmental uncertainties and risks related to natural disasters; and
•
the loss of any of our key officers, such as Mr. David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer, Mr. Terry Lee Brubaker, our vice chairman and chief operating officer, Mr. Robert Cutlip, our president, or Mr. Michael Sodo, our chief financial officer.

This list of risks and uncertainties, however, is only a summary of some of the most important factors to us and is not intended to be exhaustive. You should carefully review the risks set forth herein under the caption “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” New factors may also emerge from time to time that could have a material adverse effect on our business.


5

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Overview

Gladstone Commercial Corporation (which we refer to as “we,” “us,” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the General Corporation Law of the State of Maryland on February 14, 2003. We have elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. We focus on acquiring, owning, and managing primarily office and industrial properties. On a selective basis, we may make long term industrial and office mortgage loans; however we do not have any mortgage loans receivable currently outstanding. Our shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 7.00% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Series D Preferred Stock”), and 6.625% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Series E Preferred Stock”), trade on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”) under the trading symbols “GOOD,” “GOODM” and “GOODN,” respectively. Our senior common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Senior Common Stock”), is not traded on any exchange or automated quotation system.

Our properties are geographically diversified and our tenants cover a broad cross section of business sectors and range in size from small to very large private and public companies, many of which are corporations that do not have publicly-rated debt. We have historically entered into, and intend in the future to enter into, purchase agreements for real estate having net leases with terms of approximately 7 to 15 years with built-in rental rate increases. Under a net lease, the tenant is required to pay most or all operating, maintenance, repair and insurance costs and real estate taxes with respect to the leased property

We actively communicate with buyout funds, real estate brokers and other third parties to locate properties for potential acquisition or to provide mortgage financing in an effort to build our portfolio. We target secondary growth markets that possess favorable economic growth trends, diversified industries, and growing population and employment.

As of February 12, 2020:
 
•
we owned 122 properties totaling 14.6 million square feet (all references herein and throughout the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements to the number of properties and square footage are unaudited) of rentable space in 28 states;
•
our occupancy rate was 97.0%;
•
the weighted average remaining term of our mortgage debt was 5.2 years and the weighted average interest rate was 4.4%; and
•
the average remaining lease term of the portfolio was 7.2 years.

We conduct substantially all of our business activities through an Umbrella Partnership Real Estate Investment Trust structure, by which all of our properties are held, directly or indirectly, by Gladstone Commercial Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”). We control the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and currently own, directly or indirectly, approximately 98.5% of the common units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”). We have in the past, and may in the future, issue OP Units in connection with the acquisition of commercial real estate, and thereby potentially expand the number of limited partners of the Operating Partnership. Limited partners who hold limited partnership units in our Operating Partnership for at least one year will generally be entitled to cause us to redeem these units for cash or, at our election, shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis.

Our Operating Partnership is the sole member of Gladstone Commercial Lending, LLC, which we refer to as Gladstone Commercial Lending. Gladstone Commercial Lending is a Delaware limited liability company that was formed to hold any real estate mortgage loans.

Our business is managed by our external adviser, Gladstone Management Corporation (the “Adviser”). Gladstone Administration, LLC (the “Administrator”), provides administrative services to us. Both our Adviser and our Administrator are affiliates of ours and each other.


6

Our Investment Objectives and Our Strategy

Our principal investment objectives are to generate income from rental properties and, to a much lesser extent, mortgage loans, which we use to fund our continuing operations and to pay monthly cash distributions to our stockholders. Our strategy is to invest in and own a diversified portfolio of leased properties (primarily office and industrial) that we believe will produce stable cash flow and increase in value. We may sell some of our real estate assets when our Adviser determines that doing so would be advantageous to us and our stockholders. We also expect to occasionally make mortgage loans secured by income-producing office or industrial real estate, which loans may have some form of equity participation. We do not have any mortgage loans receivable currently outstanding.

In addition to cash on hand and cash from operations, we use funds from various other sources to finance our acquisitions and operations, including equity, our Credit Facility, mortgage financing and other sources that may become available from time to time. We believe that moderate leverage is prudent and we aspire to become an investment grade borrower over time. We intend to primarily use non-recourse mortgage financing that will allow us to limit our loss exposure on any property to the amount of equity invested in such property.

In addition to our use of leverage, we were active in the equity markets during 2019 by issuing shares of common stock under our at-the-market programs (“Common ATM Program”), pursuant to our At-the-Market Equity Offering Sales Agreement (the “Common Stock Sales Agreement”) with Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated (“Baird”), Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC (“Goldman Sachs”), Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (“Stifel”), BTIG, LLC, and Fifth Third Securities, Inc. (“Fifth Third”) (collectively, the “Common Stock Sales Agents”), and formerly with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (“Cantor”). We also completed an underwritten public offering for our newly designated Series E Preferred Stock and entered into an at-the-market program for the Series E Preferred Stock (the “Series E Preferred ATM Program,” and together with the Common ATM Program, the “ATM Programs”) pursuant to our At-the-Market Equity Offering Sales Agreement (the “Series E Preferred Stock Sales Agreement”) with Baird, Goldman Sachs, Stifel, Fifth Third, and U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. (collectively the “Series E Preferred Stock Sales Agents”).

Investment Policies

Types of Investments

Overview

We intend to earn substantially all of our revenues from the ownership of income-producing real property or, to a much lesser extent, mortgage loans secured by real property. We expect that a majority of our investments will continue to be structured as net leases that require the tenant to pay most or all of the operating costs, costs of maintenance and repair, insurance and real estate taxes on the property. However, if a net lease would have an adverse impact on a potential tenant, or we assume a lease with a different existing structure in place, we may structure our investment as either a gross or modified gross lease, or as a mortgage loan. Investments are not restricted to geographical areas, but we expect that most of our investments in real estate will continue to be made within the continental United States. Some of our investments may also be made through joint ventures that would permit us to own interests in large properties without restricting the diversity of our portfolio.

We anticipate that we will make substantially all of our investments through our Operating Partnership. Our Operating Partnership may acquire interests in real property or mortgage loans in exchange for the issuance of common shares, OP Units, cash, or through a combination of the aforementioned. OP Units issued by our Operating Partnership generally will be redeemable for cash or, at our election, shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis after the one-year anniversary of their issuance. We may in the future also conduct some of our business and hold some of our interests in real properties or mortgage loans through one or more wholly-owned subsidiaries that are not owned, directly or indirectly, through our Operating Partnership.

Property Acquisitions and Net Leasing

To date, we have purchased a majority of our properties from owners that have leased their properties to non-affiliated tenants, and while we have engaged in some transactions with tenants who have consummated sale-leaseback transactions, these transactions do not comprise the dominant portion of our portfolio. We expect that some of our sale-leaseback transactions will be in conjunction with acquisitions, recapitalizations or other corporate transactions affecting our tenants. In these transactions, we may act as one of several sources of financing by purchasing one or more properties from the tenant and by leasing it on a net basis to the tenant or its successor in interest.


7

Our portfolio consists primarily of single-tenant office and industrial real property. While we will continue to acquire select multi-tenant office and industrial properties, our primary focus is single-tenant industrial and office properties. Generally, we lease properties to tenants that our Adviser deems creditworthy under leases that will be full recourse obligations of our tenants or their affiliates. We seek to obtain lease terms of approximately seven to 15 years with built-in rental increases.

We have formed relationships with nationally recognized strategic partners to assist us with the management of our properties in each of our markets. These relationships provide local expertise to ensure that our properties are properly maintained and that our tenants have local points of contact to address property issues. This strategy improves our operating efficiencies, increases local market intelligence for the Adviser, and generally does not increase our costs as the local property managers are reimbursed by the tenants in accordance with the lease agreements.

Investments in Mortgage Loans

Although we expect to make investments in mortgage loans sparingly, we may elect to structure our investment in a particular property as a mortgage loan secured by the property. We anticipate that most of our lending transactions would be loans secured by industrial or office property or issued in connection with a build-to-suit transaction. Our Adviser will attempt to structure mortgage loans in a manner that would provide us with current income substantially similar to that which we could expect to receive had the investment been structured as a net lease transaction.

To the extent that we invest in mortgage loans, we will generally originate those loans. However, we may also purchase mortgage loans from banks, collateralized mortgage backed securities (“CMBS”) pools or other lenders provided that such transactions are otherwise consistent with our investment objectives. Our Adviser will service the mortgage loans in our portfolio by monitoring the collection of monthly principal and interest payments on our behalf. We do not have any mortgage loans receivable currently outstanding.

Underwriting Criteria, Due Diligence Process and Negotiating Lease Provisions

We consider underwriting of the real estate and the tenant for the property (or the borrower in the case of a mortgage loan) to be the two most important aspects of evaluating a prospective investment. In analyzing potential acquisitions of properties and leases, our Adviser reviews all aspects of the potential transaction, including tenant and real estate fundamentals, to determine whether potential acquisitions and leases can be structured to satisfy our acquisition criteria. The criteria listed below provide general guideposts that our Adviser may consider when underwriting leases and mortgage loans:
 
•
Credit Evaluation. Our Adviser evaluates each potential tenant or borrower for its creditworthiness, considering factors such as its rating by a national credit rating agency, if any, management experience, industry position and fundamentals, operating history and capital structure. As of December 31, 2019, 42% of our lease revenues were earned from tenants that were rated by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. A prospective tenant or borrower that is deemed creditworthy does not necessarily mean that we will consider its property to be “investment grade.” Our Adviser seeks tenants and borrowers that range from small businesses, many of which do not have publicly rated debt, to large public companies. Our Adviser’s investment professionals have substantial experience in locating and underwriting these types of companies. By leasing properties to these tenants, we believe that we will generally be able to charge rent that is higher than the rent charged to tenants with unleveraged balance sheets and recognized credit, thereby enhancing current return from these properties as compared with properties leased to companies whose credit potential has already been recognized by the market. Furthermore, if a tenant’s credit improves, the value of our lease or investment will likely increase (if all other factors affecting value remain unchanged). In evaluating a possible investment, we believe that the creditworthiness of a prospective tenant can be a more significant factor than the unleased value of the property itself. While our Adviser selects tenants it believes to be creditworthy, tenants are not required to meet any minimum rating established by an independent credit rating agency. Our Adviser’s standards for determining whether a particular tenant is creditworthy vary in accordance with a variety of factors relating to specific prospective tenants. The creditworthiness of a tenant or borrower is determined on a tenant-by-tenant and case-by-case basis. Therefore, general standards for creditworthiness cannot be applied.
 
•
Leases with Increasing Rent. Our Adviser seeks to acquire properties with leases that include a provision in each lease that provides for annual rent escalations over the term of the lease. A majority of our leases contain fixed rental escalations; however certain of our leases are tied to increases in indices, such as the consumer price index and we have a small number of leases without rental escalations.


8

•
Diversification. Our Adviser attempts to diversify our portfolio to avoid dependence on any one particular tenant, facility type, geographic location or tenant industry. By diversifying our portfolio, our Adviser intends to reduce the adverse effect of a single under-performing investment or a downturn in any particular industry or geographic region. Please see Item 2 of this Form 10-K for a summary of our portfolio by industry and geographic location.

•
Property Valuation. The business prospects and the financial strength of the tenant are important aspects of the evaluation of any sale and leaseback of property, or acquisition of property subject to a net lease, particularly a property that is specifically suited to the needs of the tenant. We generally require quarterly unaudited and annual audited financial statements of the tenant to continuously monitor the financial performance of the tenant. Our Adviser evaluates the financial capability of the tenant and its ability to perform per the terms of the lease, including obtaining certificates of insurance and verifying payment of real estate taxes on an annual basis. Our Adviser will also examine the available operating results of prospective investment properties to determine whether or not projected rental levels are likely to be met. As further described below, our Adviser also evaluates the physical characteristics of a prospective property investment and comparable properties as well as the geographic location of the property in the particular market to ensure that the characteristics are favorable for re-leasing the property at approximately the same or higher rental rate should that necessity arise. Our Adviser then computes the value of the property based on historical and projected operating results. In addition, each property that we propose to purchase is appraised by an independent appraiser. These appraisals may take into consideration, among other things, the terms and conditions of the particular lease transaction and the conditions of the credit markets at the time the purchase is negotiated, as well as a value assessment of like properties in the market. We generally limit the purchase price of each acquisition to less than 5% of our consolidated total assets.

•
Properties Important to Tenant Operations. Our Adviser generally seeks to acquire investment properties that are essential or important to the ongoing operations of the prospective tenant. We believe that these investment properties provide better protection in the event a tenant files bankruptcy, as leases on properties essential or important to the operations of a bankrupt tenant are typically less likely to be rejected in bankruptcy or otherwise terminated.

•
Lease Provisions that Enhance and Protect Value. When appropriate, our Adviser attempts to acquire properties with leases that require our consent to specified tenant activity or require the tenant to satisfy specific operating tests. These provisions may include operational or financial covenants of the tenant, as well as indemnification of us by the tenant against environmental and other contingent liabilities. We believe that these provisions serve to protect our investments from changes in the operating and financial characteristics of a tenant that may impact its ability to satisfy its obligations to us or that could reduce the value of our properties. Our Adviser generally also seeks covenants requiring tenants to receive our consent prior to any change in control of the tenant.
 
•
Credit Enhancement. Our Adviser may also seek to enhance the likelihood of a tenant’s lease obligations being satisfied through a cross-default with other tenant obligations, a letter of credit or a guaranty of lease obligations from each tenant’s corporate parent. We believe that this type of credit enhancement, if obtained, provides us with additional financial security.

Underwriting of the Real Estate and Due Diligence Process

In addition to underwriting the tenant or borrower, our Adviser also underwrites the real estate to be acquired or secured by one of our mortgages. On our behalf, our Adviser performs a due diligence review with respect to each property, such as evaluating the physical condition of a property, zoning and site requirements to ensure the property is in compliance with all zoning regulations as well as an environmental site assessment, in an attempt to determine potential environmental liabilities associated with a property prior to its acquisition, although there can be no assurance that hazardous substances or wastes (as defined by present or future federal or state laws or regulations) will not be discovered on the property after we acquire it. We could incur significant costs related to government regulation and private litigation over environmental matters. See “Risk Factors – We could be exposed to liability and remedial costs related to environmental matters.”

Our Adviser also reviews the structural soundness of the improvements on the property and may engage a structural engineer to review multiple aspects of the structures to determine the longevity of each building on the property. This review normally also includes the components of each building, such as the roof, the structure and configuration, the electrical wiring, the heating and air-conditioning system, the plumbing, parking lot and various other aspects such as compliance with state and federal building codes.

Our Adviser also physically inspects the real estate and surrounding real estate as part of determining its value. This aspect of our Adviser’s due diligence is aimed at arriving at a valuation of the real estate under the assumption that it would not be rented to the existing tenant. As part of this process, our Adviser may consider one or more of the following items:

9

 
•
The comparable value of similar real estate in the same general area of the prospective property. In this regard, comparable property is difficult to define because each piece of real estate has its own distinct characteristics. But to the extent possible, comparable property in the area that has sold or is for sale will be used to determine if the price to be paid for the property is reasonable. The question of comparable properties’ sale prices is particularly relevant if a property might be sold by us at a later date.

•
An assessment of the relative appropriate nature and flexibility of the building configuration and its ability to be re-leased to other users in a single or multiple tenant arrangement.

•
The comparable real estate rental rates for similar properties in the same area of the prospective property.

•
Alternative property uses that may offer higher value.

•
The replacement cost of the property at current construction prices if it were to be sold.

•
The assessed value as determined by the local real estate taxing authority.

In addition, our Adviser supplements its valuation with an independent real estate appraisal in connection with each investment that we consider. When appropriate, our Adviser may engage experts to undertake some or all of the due diligence efforts described above.

Use of Leverage

In addition to cash on hand and cash from operations, we use funds from various other sources to finance our acquisitions and operations, including common and preferred equity, our Credit Facility, mortgage financing and other sources that may become available from time to time. We believe that moderate leverage is prudent and we aspire to achieve an investment grade rating over time.

Currently, the majority of our mortgage borrowings are structured as non-recourse to us, with limited exceptions that would trigger recourse to us only upon the occurrence of certain fraud, misconduct, environmental or bankruptcy events. The use of non-recourse financing allows us to limit our exposure to the amount of equity invested in the properties pledged as collateral for our borrowings. Non-recourse financing generally restricts a lender’s claim on the assets of the borrower, and as a result, the lender generally may look only to the property securing the debt for its satisfaction. We believe that this financing strategy, to the extent available, protects our other assets. However, we can provide no assurance that non-recourse financing will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all, and consequently, there may be circumstances where lenders have recourse to our other assets. To a much lesser extent, we use recourse financing. Of the $453.7 million in mortgage notes payable, net, outstanding as of December 31, 2019, only $4.8 million is recourse to the Company, or 1.1% of the total amount outstanding.

On August 7, 2013, we procured a senior unsecured revolving credit facility (“Revolver”), with KeyBank National Association (“Keybank”) (serving as a revolving lender, a letter of credit issuer and an administrative agent) and other syndicated lenders. Our Revolver was initially for $60.0 million, but was increased to $85.0 million through subsequent amendments. On October 5, 2015, we added a $25.0 million 5-year term loan facility (“Term Loan”). On October 27, 2017, we expanded our Term Loan to $75.0 million and extended the maturity date to October 27, 2022, and also extended the maturity date of our Revolver through October 27, 2021. On July 2, 2019, we expanded our Term Loan from $75.0 million to $160.0 million, inclusive of a delayed draw component whereby we can incrementally borrow on the Term Loan up to the $160.0 million commitment, and increased the Revolver from $85.0 million to $100.0 million. The Term Loan has a new five-year term, with a maturity date of July 2, 2024, and the Revolver has a new four-year term, with a maturity date of July 2, 2023. The interest rate margin for each of the Term Loan and Revolver was reduced by 10 basis points at each leverage tier. We refer to the Term Loan and Revolver, collectively, herein, as the Credit Facility.

Conflict of Interest Policy

We have adopted policies to reduce potential conflicts of interest. In addition, our directors are subject to certain provisions of Maryland law that are designed to minimize conflicts. However, we cannot assure you that these policies or provisions of law will reduce or eliminate the influence of these conflicts.

Under our current conflict of interest policy, without the approval of a majority of our independent directors, we will not:
 

10

•
acquire from or sell any assets or other property to any of our officers, directors or our Adviser’s employees, or any entity in which any of our officers, directors or Adviser’s employees has an interest of more than 5%;

•
borrow from any of our directors, officers or our Adviser’s employees, or any entity, in which any of our officers, directors or our Adviser’s employees has an interest of more than 5%; or

•
engage in any other transaction with any of our directors, officers or our Adviser’s employees, or any entity in which any of our directors, officers or our Adviser’s employees has an interest of more than 5% (except that our Adviser may lease office space in a building that we own, provided that the rental rate under the lease is determined by our independent directors to be at a fair market rate).

Our policy also prohibits us from purchasing any real property owned by or co-investing with our Adviser, any of its affiliates or any business in which our Adviser or any of its subsidiaries have invested, except that we may lease property to existing and prospective portfolio companies of current or future affiliates, such as our affiliated publicly-traded funds Gladstone Capital Corporation (“Gladstone Capital”), Gladstone Land Corporation (“Gladstone Land”) or Gladstone Investment Corporation (“Gladstone Investment”), and other entities advised by our Adviser, so long as that entity does not control the portfolio company and the transaction is approved by both companies’ board of directors. If we decide to change this policy on co-investments with our Adviser or its affiliates, we will seek our stockholders’ approval.

Future Revisions in Policies and Strategies

Our independent directors periodically review our investment policies to evaluate whether they are in the best interests of us and our stockholders. Our investment procedures, objectives and policies may vary as new investment techniques are developed or as regulatory requirements change, and except as otherwise provided in our charter or bylaws, may be altered by a majority of our directors (including a majority of our independent directors) without the approval of our stockholders, to the extent that our Board of Directors determines that such modification is in the best interest of our stockholders. Among other factors, developments in the market which affect the policies and strategies described in this report or which change our assessment of the market may cause our Board of Directors to revise our investment policies and strategies.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics and business conduct applicable to all personnel of our Adviser that complies with the guidelines set forth in Item 406 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. This code establishes procedures for personal investments, restricts certain transactions by such personnel and requires the reporting of certain transactions and holdings by such personnel. A copy of this code is available for review, free of charge, on the investor relations section of our website at www.GladstoneCommercial.com. We intend to provide any required disclosure of any amendments to or waivers of this code of ethics by posting information regarding any such amendment or waiver to our website.

Our Adviser and Administrator

Our business is managed by our Adviser. The officers, directors and employees of our Adviser have significant experience in making investments in and lending to businesses of all sizes, and investing in real estate and making mortgage loans. We have entered into an investment advisory agreement with our Adviser, as amended (the “Advisory Agreement”), under which our Adviser is responsible for managing our assets and liabilities, for operating our business on a day-to-day basis and for identifying, evaluating, negotiating and consummating investment transactions consistent with our investment policies as determined by our Board of Directors from time to time. The Administrator employs our chief financial officer, treasurer, chief compliance officer, and general counsel and secretary (who also serves as our Administrator’s president, general counsel, and secretary) and their respective staffs and provides administrative services for us under the Administration Agreement.

David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer, is also the chairman, chief executive officer and the controlling stockholder of our Adviser and our Administrator. Terry Lee Brubaker, our vice chairman and chief operating officer, also serves in the same capacities for our Adviser and our Administrator. Robert Cutlip, our president, is also an executive managing director of our Adviser.

Our Adviser has an investment committee that approves each of our investments. This investment committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Gladstone, Cutlip and Brubaker. We believe that the review process of our investment committee gives us a unique competitive advantage over other REITs because of the substantial experience that its members possess and their unique perspective in evaluating the blend of corporate credit, real estate and lease terms that collectively provide an acceptable risk for our investments.


11

Our Adviser’s board of directors has empowered our investment committee to authorize and approve our investments, subject to the terms of the Advisory Agreement. Before we acquire any property, the transaction is reviewed by our investment committee to ensure that, in its view, the proposed transaction satisfies our investment criteria and is within our investment policies. Approval by our investment committee is generally the final step in the property acquisition approval process, although the separate approval of our Board of Directors is required in certain circumstances described below. For further detail on this process, please see “Investment Policies—Underwriting Criteria, Due Diligence Process and Negotiating Lease Provisions.”

Our Adviser and Administrator are headquartered in McLean, Virginia, a suburb of Washington, D.C., and our Adviser also has offices in other states. Refer to Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Advisory and Administration Agreements” for a detailed discussion on the Adviser and Administrator’s fee structure.

Adviser Duties and Authority under the Advisory Agreement

Under the terms of the Advisory Agreement, our Adviser is required to use its best efforts to present to us investment opportunities consistent with our investment policies and objectives as adopted by our Board of Directors. In performing its duties, our Adviser, either directly or indirectly by engaging an affiliate:
 
•
finds, evaluates and enters into contracts to purchase real estate and make mortgage loans on our behalf in compliance with our investment procedures, objectives and policies, subject to approval of our Board of Directors, where required;

•
provides advice to us and acts on our behalf with respect to the negotiation, acquisition, financing, refinancing, holding, leasing and disposition of real estate investments;

•
takes the actions and obtains the services necessary to effect the negotiation, acquisition, financing, refinancing, holding, leasing and disposition of real estate investments; and

•
provides day-to-day management of our business activities and other administrative services for us as requested by our Board of Directors.

Our Board of Directors has authorized our Adviser to make investments in any property on our behalf without the prior approval of our Board of Directors if the following conditions are satisfied:
 
•
our Adviser has obtained an independent appraisal for the property indicating that the total cost of the property does not exceed its appraised value; and

•
our Adviser has concluded that the property, in conjunction with our other investments and proposed investments, is reasonably expected to fulfill our investment objectives and policies as established by our Board of Directors then in effect.

The actual terms and conditions of transactions involving investments in properties and mortgage loans are determined at the sole discretion of our Adviser, subject at all times to compliance with the foregoing requirements. However, some types of transactions require the prior approval of our Board of Directors, including a majority of our independent directors, including the following:
 
•
loans not secured or otherwise supported by real property;

•
any acquisition or mortgage loan which at the time of investment would have a cost exceeding 20% of our total assets;

•
transactions that involve conflicts of interest with our Adviser or other affiliates (other than reimbursement of expenses in accordance with the Advisory Agreement); and

•
the lease of assets to our Adviser, its affiliates or any of our officers or directors.

Our Adviser and Administrator also engage in other business ventures and, as a result, their resources are not dedicated exclusively to our business. For example, our Adviser and Administrator also serve as the external adviser or administrator, respectively, to Gladstone Capital and Gladstone Investment, both publicly traded business development companies affiliated with us, and Gladstone Land Corporation, a publicly traded agricultural REIT that is also our affiliate. However, under the Advisory Agreement, our Adviser is required to devote sufficient resources to the administration of our affairs to discharge its obligations under the agreement. The Advisory Agreement is not assignable or transferable by either us or our Adviser without the consent of the other party, except that our Adviser may assign the Advisory Agreement to an affiliate for whom our Adviser agrees to guarantee its obligations to us.

12


Gladstone Securities

Gladstone Securities, LLC (“Gladstone Securities”), is a privately held broker dealer registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and insured by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. Gladstone Securities is an affiliate of ours, as its parent company is controlled by David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer. Mr. Gladstone also serves on the board of managers of Gladstone Securities.

Mortgage Financing Arrangement Agreement

We also entered into an agreement with Gladstone Securities, effective June 18, 2013, for it to act as our non-exclusive agent to assist us with arranging mortgage financing for properties we own. In connection with this engagement, Gladstone Securities may from time to time solicit the interest of various commercial real estate lenders or recommend to us third party lenders offering credit products or packages that are responsive to our needs. We pay Gladstone Securities a financing fee in connection with the services it provides to us for securing mortgage financing on any of our properties. The amount of these financing fees, which are payable upon closing of the financing, will be based on a percentage of the amount of the mortgage, generally ranging from 0.15% to a maximum of 1.0% of the mortgage obtained. The amount of the financing fees may be reduced or eliminated, as determined by us and Gladstone Securities, after taking into consideration various factors, including, but not limited to, the involvement of any third party brokers and market conditions. The agreement is scheduled to terminate on August 31, 2020, unless renewed and approved by our Board of Directors or earlier terminated.

Employees

We do not currently have any employees and do not expect to have any employees in the foreseeable future. Currently, services necessary for our business are provided by individuals who are employees of our Adviser and our Administrator pursuant to the terms of the Advisory Agreement and the Administration Agreement, respectively. Each of our executive officers is an employee or officer, or both, of our Adviser or our Administrator. We expect that a total of 15 to 20 full time employees of our Adviser and our Administrator will spend substantially all or all of their time on our matters during calendar year 2020. Our President and CFO, accounting team, and the employees of our Adviser that manage our assets and our investments spend all of their time on our matters. To the extent that we acquire more investments, we anticipate that the number of employees of our Adviser and our Administrator who devote time to our matters will increase.

As of December 31, 2019, our Adviser and Administrator collectively had 70 full-time employees. A breakdown of these employees is summarized by functional area in the table below:
 
Number of Individuals
Functional Area
12
Executive Management
38
Investment Management, Asset Management, Portfolio Management and Due Diligence
20
Administration, Accounting, Compliance, Human Resources, Legal and Treasury

Competition

We compete with a number of other real estate investment companies and traditional mortgage lenders, many of whom have greater marketing and financial resources than we do. Principal factors of competition in our primary business of investing in and owning leased industrial and office real property are the quality of properties, leasing terms, attractiveness and convenience of location. Additionally, our ability to compete depends upon, among other factors, trends of the national and local economies, investment alternatives, financial condition and operating results of current and prospective tenants and borrowers, availability and cost of capital, taxes and governmental regulations.


13

Available Information

Copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and amendments, if any, to those reports filed or furnished with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act are available free of charge through our website at www.GladstoneCommercial.com as soon as practicable after such reports have been filed or furnished to the SEC. Information on our website should not be considered part of this Form 10-K. A request for any of these reports may also be submitted to us by sending a written request addressed to Investor Relations, Gladstone Commercial Corporation, 1521 Westbranch Drive, Suite 100, McLean, VA 22102, or by calling our toll-free investor relations line at 1-866-366-5745. The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.


14

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

An investment in our securities involves a number of significant risks and other factors relating to our structure and investment objectives. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will achieve our investment objectives. You should consider carefully the following information before making an investment in our securities.

Risks related to our business and properties

Certain of our tenants and borrowers may be unable to pay rent or make mortgage payments, which could adversely affect our cash available to make distributions to our stockholders.

Some of our tenants and borrowers may have recently been either restructured using leverage, or acquired in a leveraged transaction. Tenants and borrowers that are subject to significant debt obligations may be unable to make their rent or mortgage payments if there are adverse changes to their businesses or because of the impact of the most recent U.S recession or recurrence of a similar event. Tenants that have experienced leveraged restructurings or acquisitions will generally have substantially greater debt and substantially lower net worth than they had prior to the leveraged transaction. In addition, the payment of rent and debt service may reduce the working capital available to leveraged entities and prevent them from devoting the resources necessary to remain competitive in their industries.

In situations where management of the tenant or borrower will change after a transaction, it may be difficult for our Adviser to determine with reasonable certainty the likelihood of the tenant’s or borrower’s business success and of its ability to pay rent or make mortgage payments throughout the lease or loan term. These companies generally are more vulnerable to adverse economic and business conditions, and increases in interest rates.

We are subject to the credit risk of our tenants, which in the event of bankruptcy, could adversely affect our results of operations.

We are subject to the credit risk of our tenants. Any bankruptcy of a tenant or borrower could cause:
 
•
the loss of lease or mortgage payments to us;

•
an increase in the costs we incur to carry the property occupied by such tenant;

•
a reduction in the value of our securities; or

•
a decrease in distributions to our stockholders.

Under bankruptcy law, a tenant who is the subject of bankruptcy proceedings has the option of continuing or terminating any unexpired lease. If a bankrupt tenant terminates a lease with us, any claim we might have for breach of the lease (excluding a claim against collateral securing the lease) will be treated as a general unsecured claim. Our claim would likely be capped at the amount the tenant owed us for unpaid rent prior to the bankruptcy unrelated to the termination, plus the greater of one year’s lease payments or 15% of the remaining lease payments payable under the lease (but no more than three years’ lease payments). In addition, due to the long-term nature of our leases and terms providing for the repurchase of a property by the tenant, a bankruptcy court could re-characterize a net lease transaction as a secured lending transaction. If that were to occur, we would not be treated as the owner of the property, but might have additional rights as a secured creditor.

In addition, we may enter into sale-leaseback transactions, whereby we would purchase a property and then lease the same property back to the person from whom we purchased it. In the event of the bankruptcy of a tenant, a transaction structured as a sale-leaseback may be re-characterized as either a financing or a joint venture, either of which outcomes could adversely affect our business. If the sale-leaseback were re-characterized as a financing, we might not be considered the owner of the property, and as a result would have the status of a creditor in relation to the tenant. In that event, we would no longer have the right to sell or encumber our ownership interest in the property. Instead, we would have a claim against the tenant for the amounts owed under the lease, with the claim arguably secured by the property. The tenant/debtor might have the ability to propose a plan restructuring the term, interest rate and amortization schedule of its outstanding balance. If confirmed by the bankruptcy court, we could be bound by the new terms, and prevented from foreclosing our lien on the property. If the sale-leaseback were re-characterized as a joint venture, we could be treated as a co-venturer with our lessee with regard to the property. As a result, we could be held liable, under some circumstances, for debts incurred by the lessee relating to the property. Either of these outcomes could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to pay distributions to stockholders.


15

We may be unable to renew leases, lease vacant space or re-lease space as leases expire, which could adversely affect our business and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

If we cannot renew leases, we may be unable to re-lease our properties to other tenants at rates equal to or above the current market rate. Even if we can renew leases, tenants may be able to negotiate lower rates as a result of market conditions. Market conditions may also hinder our ability to lease vacant space in newly developed or redeveloped properties. In addition, we may enter into or acquire leases for properties that are suited to the needs of a particular tenant. Such properties may require renovations, tenant improvements or other concessions to lease them to other tenants if the initial leases terminate. We may be required to expend substantial funds for tenant improvements and tenant refurbishments to re-lease the vacated space and cannot assure you that we will have sufficient sources of funding available to use in the future for such purposes and therefore may have difficulty in securing a replacement tenant. We may also have challenges in leasing properties that currently have leases which make up a significant portion of our rent. Any of these factors could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow or our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

Net leases may not result in fair market lease rates over time, thereby failing to maximize income and distributions to our stockholders.

A large portion of our rental income comes from net leases, which frequently provide the tenant greater discretion in using the leased property than ordinary property leases, such as the right to sublease the property, subject to our approval, to make alterations in the leased premises and to terminate the lease prior to its expiration under specified circumstances. Further, net leases are typically for longer lease terms and, thus, there is an increased risk that contractual rental increases in future years will fail to result in fair market rental rates during those years. As a result, our income and distributions to our stockholders could be lower than they would otherwise be if we did not engage in net leases.

Multi-tenant properties expose us to additional risks.

Our multi-tenant properties could expose us to the risk that a sufficient number of suitable tenants may not be found to enable the property to operate profitably. This loss of income could cause a material adverse impact to our results of operations and business. Multi-tenant properties are also subject to tenant turnover and fluctuation in occupancy rates, which could affect our operating results. Furthermore, multi-tenant properties expose us to the risk of increased operating expenses, which may occur when the actual cost of taxes, insurance and maintenance at the property exceeds the operating expenses paid by tenants and/or the amounts budgeted.

We face certain risks associated with our build-to-suit activities.

We may (1) provide a developer with either a combination of financing for construction of a build-to-suit property or a commitment to acquire a property upon completion of construction of a build-to-suit property and commencement of rent from the tenant or (2) acquire a property subject to a lease and engage a developer to complete construction of a build-to-suit property as required by the lease. We face uncertainties associated with a developer’s timely performance and timely completion of a project, including the performance or timely completion of contractors and subcontractors. If a developer, contractor or subcontractor fails to perform, we may resort to legal action to compel performance, remove the developer or rescind the purchase or construction contract. We may also incur additional risks as we make periodic payments or other advances to developers before completion of construction. These and other factors can result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment, and may be affected by conditions beyond both our and the developer’s control.

Illiquidity of real estate investments may make it difficult for us to sell properties in response to market conditions and could harm our financial condition and ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

To the extent the properties are not subject to triple-net leases, some significant expenditures, such as real estate taxes and maintenance costs, are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investment. Should these events occur, our income and funds available for distribution could be adversely affected. In addition, as a REIT, we may be subject to a 100% tax on net income derived from the sale of property considered to be held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of our business. We may seek to avoid this tax by complying with certain safe harbor rules that generally limit the number of properties we may sell in a given year, the aggregate expenditures made on such properties prior to their disposition, and how long we retain such properties before disposing of them. However, we can provide no assurance that we will always be able to comply with these safe harbors. If compliance is possible, the safe harbor rules may restrict our ability to sell assets in the future and achieve liquidity that may be necessary to fund distributions.


16

Our real estate investments may include special use and single or multi-tenant properties that may be difficult to sell or re-lease upon tenant defaults, early lease terminations, or non-renewals.

We focus our investments on office and industrial properties, a number of which include manufacturing facilities, special use storage or warehouse facilities and special use single or multi-tenant properties. These types of properties are relatively illiquid compared to other types of real estate and financial assets. This illiquidity will limit our ability to quickly change our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. With these properties, if the current lease is terminated or not renewed or, in the case of a mortgage loan, if we take such property in foreclosure, we may be required to renovate the property or to make rent concessions to lease the property to another tenant or sell the property. In addition, in the event we are forced to sell the property, we may have difficulty selling it to a party other than the tenant or borrower due to the special purpose for which the property may have been designed.

These and other limitations may affect our ability to sell or re-lease properties without adversely affecting returns to our stockholders.

Many of our tenants are lower middle market businesses, which exposes us to additional risks unique to these entities.

Leasing real property or making mortgage loans to lower middle market businesses exposes us to a number of unique risks related to these entities, including the following:
 
•
Lower middle market businesses may have limited financial resources and may not be able to make their lease or mortgage payments on a timely basis, or at all. A lower middle market tenant or borrower may be more likely to have difficulty making its lease or mortgage payments when it experiences adverse events, such as the failure to meet its business plan, a downturn in its industry or negative economic conditions because its financial resources may be more limited.

•
Lower middle market businesses typically have narrower product lines and smaller market shares than large businesses. Because our target tenants and borrowers are typically smaller businesses that may have narrower product lines and smaller market share, they may be more vulnerable to competitors’ actions and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns.

•
There is generally little or no publicly available information about our target tenants and borrowers. Many of our tenants and borrowers are privately owned businesses, about which there is generally little or no publicly available operating and financial information. As a result, we will rely on our Adviser to perform due diligence investigations of these tenants and borrowers, their operations and their prospects. Our Adviser will perform ongoing credit assessments of our tenants by reviewing all financial disclosures required from our respective leases. We may not learn all of the material information we need to know regarding these businesses through our investigations.

•
Lower middle market businesses generally have less predictable operating results. We expect that many of our tenants and borrowers may experience significant fluctuations in their operating results, may from time to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence, may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, to finance expansion or to maintain their competitive positions, may otherwise have a weak financial position or may be adversely affected by changes in the business cycle.

•
Lower middle market businesses are more likely to be dependent on one or two persons. Typically, the success of a lower middle market business also depends on the management talents and efforts of one or two persons or a small group of persons. The death, disability or resignation of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on our tenant or borrower and, in turn, on us.

Our real estate investments have a limited number of tenants and are concentrated in a limited number of industries, which subjects us to an increased risk of significant loss if any one of these tenants is unable to pay or if particular industries experience downturns.

As of December 31, 2019, we owned 118 properties and had 122 leases on these properties, and our five largest tenants accounted for approximately 16.0% of our total lease revenue. A consequence of a limited number of tenants is that the aggregate returns we realize may be materially adversely affected by the unfavorable performance of a small number of tenants. We generally do not have fixed guidelines for industry concentration, but we are restricted from exceeding an industry concentration greater than 20% without approval of our investment committee. As of December 31, 2019, 16.7% of our total lease revenue was earned from tenants in the Telecommunications industry, 13.4% was earned from tenants in the Diversified/Conglomerate Services industry, and 13.2% was earned from tenants in the Automobile industry and 11.5% was earned from tenants in the Healthcare industry. As a result, a downturn in an industry in which we have invested a significant portion of our total assets could have a material adverse effect on us.

17


The inability of a tenant in a single tenant property to pay rent will reduce our revenues and increase our carrying costs of the building.

Since most of our properties are occupied by a single tenant, the success of each investment will be materially dependent on the financial stability of these tenants. If a tenant defaults, our lease revenues would be reduced and our expenses associated with carrying the property would increase, as we would be responsible for payments such as taxes and insurance. Lease payment defaults by these tenants could adversely affect our cash flows and cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to stockholders. In the event of a default by a tenant, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-leasing our property. If a lease is terminated, there is no assurance that we will be able to lease the property for the rent previously received or sell the property without incurring a loss.

Liability for uninsured losses or significant increases in our insurance premiums could adversely affect our financial condition.

Losses from disaster-type occurrences (such as wars, floods or earthquakes) may be either uninsurable or not insurable on economically viable terms. Should such a loss occur, we could lose our capital investment or anticipated profits and cash flow from one or more properties. Additionally, insurance premiums are subject to significant increases and fluctuations, which can be widely outside of our control. For example, the potential impact of climate change and the increased risk of extreme weather events and natural disasters could cause a significant increase in our insurance premiums and adversely affect the availability of coverage.

We could incur significant costs related to government regulation and private litigation over environmental matters.

Under various environmental laws, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for contamination resulting from the release or threatened release of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum at that property, and an entity that arranges for the disposal or treatment of a hazardous or toxic substance or petroleum at another property may be held jointly and severally liable for the cost to investigate and clean up such property or other affected property. Such parties are known as potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”). Environmental laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of the contaminants, and the costs of any required investigation or cleanup of these substances can be substantial. PRPs are liable to the government as well as to other PRPs who may have claims for contribution. The liability is generally not limited under such laws and could exceed the property’s value and the aggregate assets of the liable party. The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination at our properties also may expose us to third-party liability for personal injury or property damage, or adversely affect our ability to sell, lease or develop the real property or to borrow using the real property as collateral.

Environmental laws also impose ongoing compliance requirements on owners and operators of real property. Environmental laws potentially affecting us address a wide variety of matters, including, but not limited to, asbestos-containing building materials, storage tanks, storm water and wastewater discharges, lead-based paint, wetlands and hazardous wastes. Failure to comply with these laws could result in fines and penalties and/or expose us to third-party liability. Some of our properties may have conditions that are subject to these requirements, and we could be liable for such fines or penalties and/or liable to third parties for those conditions.

We could be exposed to liability and remedial costs related to environmental matters.

Certain of our properties may contain, or may have contained, asbestos-containing building materials (“ACBMs”). Environmental laws require that ACBMs be properly managed and maintained and may impose fines and penalties on building owners and operators for failure to comply with these requirements. Also, certain of our properties may contain, or may have contained, or are adjacent to or near other properties that have contained or currently contain storage tanks for the storage of petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances. These operations create a potential for the release of petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances. Certain of our properties may contain, or may have contained, elevated radon levels. Third parties may be permitted by law to seek recovery from owners or operators for property damage and/or personal injury associated with exposure to contaminants, including, but not limited to, petroleum products, hazardous or toxic substances and asbestos fibers. Also, certain of our properties may contain regulated wetlands that can delay or impede development or require costs to be incurred to mitigate the impact of any disturbance. Absent appropriate permits, we can be held responsible for restoring wetlands and be required to pay fines and penalties.


18

Certain of our properties may contain, or may have contained, microbial matter such as mold and mildew. The presence of microbial matter could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, if any of our property is not properly connected to a water or sewer system, or if the integrity of such systems are breached, or if water intrusion into our buildings otherwise occurs, microbial matter or other contamination can develop. When excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. If this were to occur, we could incur significant remedial costs and we may also be subject to material private damage claims and awards. Concern about indoor exposure to mold has been increasing, as exposure to mold may cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions. If we become subject to claims in this regard, it could materially and adversely affect us and our future insurability for such matters.

The assessments we perform on our acquisition of property may fail to reveal all environmental conditions, liabilities or compliance concerns. Material environmental conditions, liabilities or compliance concerns may have arisen after the assessments were conducted or may arise in the future, and future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material additional environmental liability. We cannot assure you that costs of future environmental compliance will not affect our ability to make distributions or that such costs or other remedial measures will not be material to us.

Our properties may be subject to impairment charges, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

We are required to periodically evaluate our properties for impairment indicators. A property’s value is considered impaired if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property, based upon its intended use, is less than the carrying value of the property. These estimates of cash flows are based upon factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of interest and capitalization rates, demand and occupancy, competition and other factors. These factors may result in uncertainty in valuation estimates and instability in the estimated value of our properties which, in turn, could result in a substantial decrease in the value of the properties and significant impairment charges.

We continually assess our properties to determine if any impairments are necessary or appropriate. No assurance can be given that we will be able to recover the current carrying amount of our properties in the future. Our failure to do so would require us to recognize additional impairment charges for the period in which we reached that conclusion, which could materially and adversely affect us and our results of operations. We recognized impairment charges of $1.8 million, $0.0 million, and $6.8 million during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

Mortgage loans may be affected by unfavorable real estate market conditions, including interest rate fluctuations, which could decrease the value of those loans and our results of operations.

Investments in mortgage loans, exposes us to the risk of default by the borrowers on those mortgage loans as well as interest rate risks. To the extent we incur delays in liquidating such defaulted mortgage loans, we may not be able to obtain sufficient proceeds to repay all amounts due to us under the mortgage loans. Further, we will not know whether the values of the properties securing the mortgage loans will remain at the levels existing on the dates of origination of those mortgage loans. If the values of the underlying properties fall, our risk will increase because of the lower value of the security associated with such loans. We do not have any mortgage loans receivable currently outstanding.

Risks related to our financing

Capital markets and economic conditions can materially affect our financial condition and results of operations, the value of our equity securities, and our ability to sustain payment of distributions at current levels.

Many factors affect the value of our equity securities and our ability to make or maintain the current levels of distributions to stockholders, including the state of the capital markets and the economy. The availability of credit has been and may in the future again be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets, which could result in financing terms that are less attractive to us and/or the unavailability of certain types of debt financing. Regulatory pressures and the burden of troubled and uncollectible loans has led some lenders and institutional investors to reduce, and in some cases, cease to provide funding to borrowers. If these market conditions recur, they may limit our ability and the ability of our tenants to timely refinance maturing liabilities and access the capital markets to meet liquidity needs, or may cause our tenants to incur increased costs associated with issuing debt instruments, which may materially affect our financial condition and results of operations and the value of our equity securities and our ability to sustain payment of distributions to stockholders at current levels.


19

In addition, it is possible that our ability to access the capital and credit markets may be limited or precluded by these or other factors at a time when we would like, or need, to do so, which would adversely impact our ability to refinance maturing debt and/or react to changing economic and business conditions. Uncertainty in the credit markets could negatively impact our ability to make acquisitions and make it more difficult or not possible for us to sell properties or may adversely affect the price we receive for properties that we do sell, as prospective buyers may experience increased costs of debt financing or difficulties in obtaining debt financing. Potential continued disruptions in the financial markets could also have other unknown adverse effects on us or the economy generally and may cause the price of our securities to fluctuate significantly and/or to decline. If we issue additional equity securities to obtain additional financing, the interest of our existing stockholders could be diluted.

Our Credit Facility contains various covenants which, if not complied with, could accelerate our repayment obligations, thereby materially and adversely affecting our liquidity, financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions to stockholders.

The agreement governing our Credit Facility requires us to comply with certain financial and operational covenants. These covenants require us to, among other things, maintain certain financial ratios, including fixed charge coverage, debt service coverage and a minimum net worth. We are also required to limit our distributions to stockholders to 98% of our FFO. As of December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with these covenants. However, our continued compliance with these covenants depends on many factors, and could be impacted by current or future economic conditions, and thus there are no assurances that we will continue to comply with these covenants. Failure to comply with these covenants would result in a default which, if we were unable to obtain a waiver from the lenders, could accelerate our repayment obligations under the Credit Facility and thereby have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions to stockholders.

Because our business strategy relies on external financing, we may be negatively affected by restrictions on additional borrowings, and the risks associated with leverage, including our debt service obligations.

We use leverage so that we may make more investments than would otherwise be possible to maximize potential returns to stockholders. Although we have been gradually reducing our overall leverage over the past few years to lower this risk, if the income generated by our properties and other assets fails to cover our debt service, we could be forced to reduce or eliminate distributions to our stockholders and may experience losses.

Our ability to achieve our investment objectives will be affected by our ability to borrow money in sufficient amounts and on favorable terms. We expect that we will primarily borrow money that will be secured by our properties and that these financing arrangements will contain customary covenants such as those that limit our ability, without the prior consent of the lender, to further mortgage the applicable property or to discontinue insurance coverage. Accordingly, we may be unable to obtain the degree of leverage we believe to be optimal, which may cause us to have less cash for distribution to stockholders than we would have with an optimal amount of leverage. Our use of leverage could also make us more vulnerable to a downturn in our business or the economy, as it may become difficult to meet our debt service obligations if our cash flows are reduced due to tenant defaults. There is also a risk that a significant increase in the ratio of our indebtedness to the measures of asset value used by financial analysts may have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities.

We face risks related to “balloon payments” and refinancing.

Some of our debt financing arrangements may require us to make lump-sum or “balloon” payments at maturity. Our ability to make a balloon payment at maturity is uncertain and may depend upon our ability to obtain additional financing or to sell the financed property. At the time the balloon payment is due, we may not be able to refinance the balloon payment on terms as favorable as the original loan or sell the property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment, which could adversely affect the amount of distributions to our stockholders. We have balloon payments of $19.5 million payable during the year ending December 31, 2020.

We mortgage our properties, which subjects us to the risk of foreclosure in the event of non-payment.

We intend to acquire additional properties by using our Credit Facility and by continuing to seek long-term mortgage financing, where we will borrow a portion of the purchase price of a potential acquisition and secure the loan with a mortgage on some or all of our existing real property. We look to regional banks, insurance companies and other non-bank lenders, and, to a lesser extent, the CMBS market to issue mortgages to finance our real estate activities. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we obtained approximately $69.7 million in long-term financing, which we used to acquire additional properties. If we are unable to make our debt payments as required, a lender could foreclose on the property securing its loan. This could cause us to lose part or all of our investment in such property which in turn could cause the value of our securities or the amount of distributions to our stockholders to be reduced.

20


We face a risk from the fact that certain of our properties are cross-collateralized.

As of December 31, 2019, the mortgages on certain of our properties were cross-collateralized. To the extent that any of the properties in which we have an interest are cross-collateralized, any default by the property owner subsidiary under the mortgage note relating to the one property will result in a default under the financing arrangements relating to any other property that also provides security for that mortgage note or is cross-collateralized with such mortgage note.

A change in the value of our assets could cause us to experience a cash shortfall or be in default of our loan covenants.

We borrow on an unsecured basis under the Credit Facility; however, we are required to maintain a pool of unsecured assets sufficient to draw on the Credit Facility. A significant reduction in the value of our pool of unencumbered assets could require us to pay down a portion (or significant portion) of the balance of the Credit Facility. Although we believe that we have significant excess collateral and capacity, future asset values are uncertain. If we were unable to meet a request to add collateral to the Credit Facility, this inability could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and our ability to meet our loan covenants.

Interest rate fluctuations may adversely affect our results of operations.

We may experience interest rate volatility in connection with mortgage loans on our properties or other variable-rate debt that we may obtain from time to time. Certain of our leases contain escalations based on market interest rates and the interest rate on our Credit Facility and a portion of our long-term mortgages is variable. We have $45.2 million of outstanding principal on variable rate mortgages as of December 31, 2019. Although we seek to mitigate this risk by structuring such provisions to contain a maximum interest rate or escalation rate, as applicable, and generally obtain rate caps and interest rate swaps to limit our exposure to interest rate risk, these features or arrangements do not eliminate this risk. We are also exposed to the effects of interest rate changes as a result of holding cash and cash equivalents in short-term, interest-bearing investments. We have entered into interest rate caps to attempt to manage our exposure to interest rate fluctuations on all our outstanding variable rate mortgages as well as the outstanding Term Loan component of our Credit Facility. Additionally, increases in interest rates, or reduced access to credit markets due, among other things, to more stringent lending requirements or a high level of leverage, may make it difficult for us to refinance our mortgage debt as it matures or limit the availability of mortgage debt, thereby limiting our acquisition and/or refinancing activities. Even in the event that we are able to secure mortgage debt on, or otherwise refinance our mortgage debt, due to increased costs associated with securing financing and other factors beyond our control, we may be unable to refinance the entire mortgage debt as it matures or be subject to unfavorable terms, including higher loan fees interest rates and periodic payments, if we do refinance the mortgage debt. A significant change in interest rates could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

Changes relating to the LIBOR calculation process may adversely affect the value of the LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt in our portfolio.

London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) is the basic rate of interest used in lending between banks on the London interbank market and is widely used as a reference for setting the interest rate on loans globally. LIBOR is expected to be phased out after 2021, when private-sector banks are no longer required to report the information used to set the rate. Without this data, LIBOR may no longer be published, or the lack of quality and quantity of data may cause the rate to no longer be representative of the market. At this time, no consensus exists as to what rate or rates will become accepted alternatives to LIBOR, although the U.S. Federal Reserve, in connection with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, a steering committee comprised of large U.S. financial institutions, is considering replacing U.S. dollar LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”). SOFR is a more generic measure than LIBOR and considers the cost of borrowing cash overnight, collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities. Given the inherent differences between LIBOR and SOFR or any other alternative benchmark rate that may be established, there are many uncertainties regarding a transition from LIBOR, including, but not limited to, how this will impact our cost of variable rate debt. The consequences of these developments with respect to LIBOR cannot be entirely predicted and span multiple future periods but could result in an increase in the cost of our variable rate debt, which could adversely impact our operating results and cash flows

All of our variable rate debt is based upon the one month LIBOR rate. We are currently monitoring the transition, as we cannot assess whether SOFR will become a standard rate for variable rate debt. Any further changes or reforms to the determination or supervision of LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR, which could have an adverse impact on the market for LIBOR-based debt, or the value of our portfolio of LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt.
 
Risks related to the real estate industry

We are subject to certain risks associated with real estate ownership and lending which could reduce the value of our investments.

21


Our investments include primarily industrial and office property. Our performance, and the value of our investments, is subject to risks inherent to the ownership and operation of these types of properties, including:
 
•
changes in the general economic climate, including the credit market;

•
changes in local conditions, such as an oversupply of space or reduction in demand for real estate;

•
changes in interest rates and the availability of financing;

•
competition from other available space;

•
changes in laws and governmental regulations, including those governing real estate usage, zoning and taxes, and the related costs of compliance with laws and regulations; and

•
variations in the occupancy rate of our properties.

The debt obligations of our tenants are dependent upon certain factors, which neither we nor our tenants or borrowers control, such as national, local and regional business and economic conditions, government economic policies, and the level of interest rates.

Competition for real estate may impede our ability to make acquisitions or increase the cost of these acquisitions.

We compete with many other entities to acquire properties, including financial institutions, institutional pension funds, other REITs, foreign real estate investors, other public and private real estate companies and private real estate investors. These competitors may prevent us from acquiring desirable properties, cause an increase in the price we must pay for real estate, have greater resources than we do, and be willing to pay more for certain assets or may have a more compatible operating philosophy with our acquisition targets. In particular, larger REITs may enjoy significant competitive advantages that result from, among other things, a lower cost of capital and enhanced operating efficiencies. Our competitors may also adopt transaction structures similar to ours or offer more substantial rent abatements, tenant improvements, early termination rights or below-market renewal options to retain tenants, which would decrease our competitive advantage in offering flexible transaction terms. In addition, the number of entities and the amount of funds competing for suitable investment properties may increase, resulting in increased demand and increased prices paid for these properties.

Our ownership of properties through ground leases exposes us to risks which are different than those resulting from our ownership of fee title to other properties.

We have acquired an interest in four of our properties by acquiring a leasehold interest in the land underlying the property, and we may acquire additional properties in the future that are subject to similar ground leases. In this situation, we have no economic interest in the land underlying the property and do not control this land, thus this type of ownership interest poses potential risks for our business because (i) if the ground lease terminates for any reason, we will lose our interest in the property, including any investment that we made in the property, (ii) if our tenant defaults under the previously existing lease, we will continue to be obligated to meet the terms and conditions of the ground lease without the annual amount of ground lease payments reimbursable to us by the tenant, and (iii) if the third party owning the land under the ground lease disrupts our use either permanently or for a significant period of time, then the value of our assets could be impaired and our results of operations could be adversely affected.

Risks related to our Adviser and Administrator

We are dependent upon our key personnel, who are employed by our Adviser or Administrator, as applicable, for our future success, particularly David Gladstone, Terry Lee Brubaker, Robert Cutlip, and Michael Sodo.

We are dependent on our senior management and other key management members to carry out our business and investment strategies. Our future success depends to a significant extent on the continued service and coordination of our senior management team, particularly David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer, Terry Lee Brubaker, our vice chairman and chief operating officer, Robert Cutlip, our president, and Michael Sodo, our chief financial officer. The departure of any of our executive officers or key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our ability to implement our business strategy and to achieve our investment objectives.


22

Our success depends on the performance of our Adviser and if our Adviser makes inadvisable investment or management decisions, our operations could be materially adversely impacted.

Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to pay distributions to our stockholders is dependent upon the performance of our Adviser in evaluating potential investments, selecting and negotiating property purchases and dispositions and mortgage loans, selecting tenants and borrowers, setting lease or mortgage loan terms and determining financing arrangements. Accomplishing these objectives on a cost-effective basis is largely a function of our Adviser’s marketing capabilities, management of the investment process, ability to provide competent, attentive and efficient services and our access to financing sources on acceptable terms. Our stockholders have no opportunity to evaluate the terms of transactions or other economic or financial data concerning our investments and must rely entirely on the analytical and management abilities of our Adviser and the oversight of our Board of Directors. If our Adviser or our Board of Directors makes inadvisable investment or management decisions, our operations could be materially adversely impacted. As we grow, our Adviser may be required to hire, train, supervise and manage new employees. Our Adviser’s failure to effectively manage our future growth could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may have conflicts of interest with our Adviser and other affiliates.

Our Adviser manages our business and locates, evaluates, recommends and negotiates the acquisition of our real estate investments. At the same time, our Advisory Agreement permits our Adviser to conduct other commercial activities and provide management and advisory services to other entities, including, but not limited to, Gladstone Capital, Gladstone Investment, and Gladstone Land. Moreover, with the exception of our chief financial officer, treasurer and president, all of our executive officers and directors are also executive officers and directors of Gladstone Capital and Gladstone Investment, which actively make loans to and invest in lower middle market companies, and with the exception of our chief financial officer and president, all of our executive officers and directors are also officers and directors of Gladstone Land, an agricultural REIT. Further, our chief executive officer and chairman is on the board of managers of Gladstone Securities, an affiliated broker dealer that provides us with mortgage financing services pursuant to a contractual agreement and is the 100% indirect owner of and controls Gladstone Securities. As a result, we may from time to time have conflicts of interest with our Adviser in its management of our business, Gladstone Securities, in its provision of services to us and our other affiliated funds, and with Gladstone Capital, Gladstone Investment and Gladstone Land, which may arise primarily from the involvement of our Adviser, Gladstone Securities, Gladstone Capital, Gladstone Investment, Gladstone Land and their affiliates in other activities that may conflict with our business.

Examples of these potential conflicts include:
 
•
our Adviser may realize substantial compensation on account of its activities on our behalf, and may, therefore, be motivated to approve acquisitions solely on the basis of increasing compensation to itself;

•
our Adviser or Gladstone Securities, may earn fee income from our borrowers or tenants; and

•
our Adviser and other affiliates such as Gladstone Capital, Gladstone Investment and Gladstone Land could compete for the time and services of our officers and directors.

These and other conflicts of interest between us and our Adviser and other affiliates could have a material adverse effect on the operation of our business and the selection or management of our real estate investments.

Our Termination of the Advisory Agreement without cause would require payment of a termination fee.

Termination of the Advisory Agreement with our Adviser without cause would be difficult and costly. We may only terminate the agreement without cause (as defined therein) upon 120 days’ prior written notice and after the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of our independent directors. Furthermore, if we default under the agreement and any applicable cure period has expired, the Adviser may terminate the agreement. In each of the foregoing cases, we will be required to pay the Adviser a termination fee equal to two times the sum of the average annual base management fee and incentive fee earned by our Adviser during the 24-month period prior to such termination. This provision increases the cost to us of terminating the Advisory Agreement and adversely affects our ability to terminate our Adviser without cause. Additionally, depending on the amount of the fee, if incurred, it could adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our common, preferred and senior common stockholders.

Our Adviser is not obligated to provide a waiver of the incentive fee, which could negatively impact our earnings and our ability to maintain our current level of, or increase, distributions to our stockholders.


23

The Advisory Agreement contemplates a quarterly incentive fee based on our Core FFO (as defined in the Advisory Agreement). Our Adviser has the ability to issue a full or partial waiver of the incentive fee for current and future periods; however, our Adviser is not required to issue any waiver. Any waiver issued by our Adviser is a voluntary, unconditional and irrevocable waiver. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 our Adviser did not issue a full or partial waiver of the incentive fee. If our Adviser does not issue this waiver in future quarters, it could negatively impact our earnings and may compromise our ability to maintain our current level of, or increase, distributions to our stockholders, which could have a material adverse impact on the market price of our securities.

Risks Related to Qualification and Operation as a REIT

If we fail to qualify as a REIT, our operations and distributions to stockholders would be adversely impacted.

We intend to continue to be organized and to operate to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). A REIT generally is not taxed at the corporate level on income it currently distributes to its stockholders. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex rules for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control may affect our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT. In addition, new legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly change the tax laws, possibly with retroactive effect, with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification.

If we were to fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year:
 
•
we would not be allowed to deduct our distributions to stockholders when computing our taxable income;

•
we would be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates;

•
we would be disqualified from being taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost, unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions;

•
our cash available for distributions to stockholders would be reduced; and

•
we may be required to borrow additional funds or sell some of our assets to pay corporate tax obligations that we may incur as a result of our disqualification.

We may need to incur additional borrowings to meet the REIT minimum distribution requirement and to avoid excise tax.

To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our annual real estate investment trust taxable income (excluding any net capital gain and before application of the distributions paid deduction). To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on our undistributed taxable income. In addition, we are subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which certain distributions paid by us with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of (i) 85% of our ordinary income for that year, (ii) 95% of our net capital gain for that year and (iii) 100% of our undistributed taxable income from prior years. To meet the 90% distribution requirement and to avoid the 4% excise tax, we may need to incur additional borrowings. Although we intend to pay distributions to our stockholders in a manner that allows us to meet the 90% distribution requirement and avoid this 4% excise tax, we cannot assure you that we will always be able to do so.

Complying with the REIT requirements may cause us to forgo otherwise attractive opportunities or liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the nature of our assets, the sources of our gross income, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our capital stock. To meet these tests, we may be required to forgo investments we might otherwise make. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our performance.


24

In particular, we must ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified real estate assets. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities, securities of taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”) and qualified real estate assets) generally cannot include more than 10% by voting power or vote of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities, securities of TRSs and qualified real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 20% (25% for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2018) of the value of our total assets can be represented by the securities of one or more TRSs.

We also must ensure that (i) at least 75% of our gross income for each taxable year consists of certain types of income that we derive, directly or indirectly, from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property or qualified temporary investment income and (ii) at least 95% of our gross income for each taxable year consists of income that is qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, other types of interest and distributions, gain from the sale or disposition of stock or securities, or any combination of these.

In addition, we may be required to make distributions to our stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate otherwise attractive investments, and may be unable to pursue investments that would otherwise be advantageous to us to satisfy the asset and gross income requirements for qualifying as a REIT. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and the amounts available for distribution to our stockholders. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to make, and, in certain cases, maintain ownership of certain attractive investments.

To the extent that our distributions represent a return of capital for tax purposes, you could recognize an increased capital gain upon a subsequent sale of your stock.

Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits and not treated by us as a dividend will not be taxable to a U.S. stockholder to the extent such distributions do not exceed the stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in its shares of our stock but instead will constitute a return of capital and will reduce the stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in its share of our stock. If our distributions result in a reduction of a stockholder’s adjusted basis in its shares of our stock, subsequent sales by such stockholder of its shares of our stock potentially will result in recognition of an increased capital gain or reduced capital loss due to the reduction in such stockholder’s adjusted basis in its shares of our stock.

We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could reduce the market price of our securities.

At any time, the federal income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended. We cannot predict when or if any new federal income tax law, regulation, or administrative interpretation, or any amendment to any existing federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, will be adopted, promulgated or become effective and any such law, regulation, or interpretation may take effect retroactively. We and our stockholders could be adversely affected by any such change in, or any new, federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation.

Complying with the REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively and may cause us to incur tax liabilities.

The REIT provisions of the Code substantially limit our ability to hedge our liabilities. Any income from a hedging transaction that we enter into to manage risk of interest rate changes, price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings made or to be made to acquire or carry real estate assets does not constitute “gross income” for purposes of the gross income requirements. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, the income from those transactions is likely to be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of both of the gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may need to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through TRSs. This could increase the cost of our hedging activities because any TRS would be subject to tax on gains or expose us to greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to bear. In addition, losses incurred by a TRS generally will not provide any tax benefit, except for being carried forward against future taxable income earned by the TRS.

Ownership limitations may restrict or prevent stockholders from engaging in certain transfers of our common stock.

Our charter contains an ownership limit which prohibits any person or group of persons from acquiring, directly or indirectly, beneficial or constructive ownership of more than 9.8% of our outstanding shares of capital stock. Shares owned by a person or a group of persons in excess of the ownership limit are deemed “excess shares.” Shares owned by a person who individually owns of record less than 9.8% of outstanding shares may nevertheless be excess shares if the person is deemed part of a group for purposes of this restriction.

25


If the transferee-stockholder acquires excess shares, the person is considered to have acted as our agent and holds the excess shares on behalf of the ultimate stockholder. When shares are held in this manner they do not have any voting rights and shall not be considered for purposes of any stockholder vote or determining a quorum for such vote.
 
Our charter stipulates that any acquisition of shares that would result in our disqualification as a REIT under the Code shall be void to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law.

The ownership limit does not apply to (i) offerors which, in accordance with applicable federal and state securities laws, make a cash tender offer, where at least 90% of the outstanding shares of our stock (not including shares or subsequently issued securities convertible into common stock which are held by the tender offeror and any “affiliates” or “associates” thereof within the meaning of the Exchange Act) are duly tendered and accepted pursuant to the cash tender offer; (ii) an underwriter in a public offering of our shares; (iii) a party initially acquiring shares in a transaction involving the issuance of our shares of capital stock, if our Board determines such party will timely distribute such shares such that, following such distribution, such shares will not be deemed excess shares; and (iv) a person or persons which our Board exempt from the ownership limit upon appropriate assurances that our qualification as a REIT is not jeopardized.

We operate as a holding company dependent upon the assets and operations of our subsidiaries, and because of our structure, we may not be able to generate the funds necessary to make dividend payments on our capital stock.

We generally operate as a holding company that conducts its businesses primarily through our Operating Partnership, which in turn is a holding company conducting its business through its subsidiaries. These subsidiaries conduct all of our operations and are our only source of income. Accordingly, we are dependent on cash flows and payments of funds to us by our subsidiaries as dividends, distributions, loans, advances, leases or other payments from our subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to make dividend payments on our capital stock. Our subsidiaries’ ability to pay such dividends and/or make such loans, advances, leases or other payments may be restricted by, among other things, applicable laws and regulations, current and future debt agreements and management agreements into which our subsidiaries may enter, which may impair our ability to make cash payments on our common stock or our preferred stock. In addition, such agreements may prohibit or limit the ability of our subsidiaries to transfer any of their property or assets to us, any of our other subsidiaries or to third parties. Our future indebtedness or our subsidiaries’ future indebtedness may also include restrictions with similar effects.

In addition, because we are a holding company, stockholders’ claims will be structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities and obligations (whether or not for borrowed money) of our Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. Therefore, in the event of our bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization, claims of our stockholders will be satisfied only after all of our and our Operating Partnership’s and its subsidiaries’ liabilities and obligations have been paid in full.

Other risks

The number of shares of preferred stock outstanding may increase as a result of the ATM Program that we have in place for our Series E Preferred Stock, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The number of outstanding shares of preferred stock may increase as a result of the ATM Program currently in place, for our Series E Preferred stock. The issuance of additional shares of Preferred Stock could have significant consequences on our future operations, including:

•
making it more difficult for us to meet our payment and other obligations to holders of our preferred stock and under our Credit Facility and to pay dividends on our common stock;

•
reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund acquisitions and for other general corporate purposes, and limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for these purposes; and

•
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, and increasing our vulnerability to, changes in our business, and adverse changes the industry in which we operate and the general economy.
 
Any of the above-listed factors could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to meet our payment obligations under our Credit Facility and monthly dividend obligations with respect to our preferred stock and to pay dividends on our common stock.


26

We are subject to restrictions that may discourage a change of control. Certain provisions contained in our articles of incorporation and Maryland law may prohibit or restrict a change of control.
 
•
Our articles of incorporation prohibit ownership of more than 9.8% of the outstanding shares of our capital stock by one person. This restriction may discourage a change of control and may deter individuals or entities from making tender offers for our capital stock, which offers might otherwise be financially attractive to our stockholders or which might cause a change in our management.

•
Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with the term of the directors in each class expiring every third year. At each annual meeting of stockholders, the successors to the class of directors whose term expires at such meeting will be elected to hold office for a term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders held in the third year following the year of their election. After election, a director may only be removed by our stockholders for cause. Election of directors for staggered terms with limited rights to remove directors makes it more difficult for a hostile bidder to acquire control of us. The existence of this provision may negatively impact the price of our securities and may discourage third-party bids to acquire our securities. This provision may reduce any premiums paid to stockholders in a change in control transaction.

•
Certain provisions of Maryland law applicable to us prohibit business combinations with:

•
any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our common stock, referred to as an “interested stockholder;”

•
an affiliate of ours who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was an interested stockholder; or

•
an affiliate of an interested stockholder.

These prohibitions last for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder. Thereafter, any business combination with the interested stockholder must be recommended by our Board of Directors and approved by the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of our outstanding shares of common stock and two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of our common stock other than shares held by the interested stockholder. These requirements could have the effect of inhibiting a change in control even if a change in control were in our stockholders’ interest. These provisions of Maryland law do not apply, however, to business combinations that are approved or exempted by our Board of Directors prior to the time that someone becomes an interested stockholder.

Market conditions could adversely affect the market price and trading volume of our securities

The market price of our common and preferred stock may be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations, and the trading volume in our common and preferred stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. We cannot assure investors that the market price of our common and preferred stock will not fluctuate or decline further in the future. Some market conditions that could negatively affect our share price or result in fluctuations in the price or trading volume of our securities include, but are not limited to:

•
price and volume fluctuations in the stock market from time to time, which are often unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies;

•
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of shares of REITs, real estate companies or other companies in our sector, which is not necessarily related to the performance of those companies;

•
price and volume fluctuations in the stock market as a result of terrorist attacks, or speculation regarding future terrorist attacks, in the United States or abroad;

•
actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results or distributions to shareholders;

•
changes in our FFO or earnings estimates or the publication of research reports about us or the real estate industry generally;

•
actions by institutional stockholders;


27

•
speculation in the press or investment community;

•
the national and global political environment, including foreign relations and trading policies;

•
changes in regulatory policies or tax guidelines, particularly with respect to REITs; and

•
investor confidence in the stock market.

Shares of common and preferred stock eligible for future sale may have adverse effects on the respective share price.

We cannot predict the effect, if any, of future sales of common or preferred stock, or the availability of shares for future sales, on the market price of our common or preferred stock. Sales of substantial amounts of common or preferred stock (including shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of units of the Operating Partnership that we may issue from time to time, issuable upon conversion of our Senior Common Stock, or issuances made through our ATM Programs or otherwise), or the perception that these sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common and preferred stock.

Compliance or failure to comply with laws requiring access to our properties by disabled persons could result in substantial cost.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), and other federal, state and local laws generally require public accommodations be made accessible to disabled persons. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the government or the award of damages to private litigants. These laws may require us to modify our existing properties. These laws may also restrict renovations by requiring improved access to such buildings by disabled persons or may require us to add other structural features which increase our construction costs. Legislation or regulations adopted in the future may impose further burdens or restrictions on us with respect to improved access by disabled persons. We may incur unanticipated expenses that may be material to our financial condition or results of operations to comply with ADA and other federal, state and local laws, or in connection with lawsuits brought by private litigants.

Our Board of Directors may change our investment policy without stockholders’ approval.

Our Board of Directors will determine our investment and financing policies, growth strategy and our debt, capitalization, distribution, acquisition, disposition and operating policies. Our Board of Directors may revise or amend these strategies and policies at any time without a vote by stockholders. Accordingly, stockholders’ control over changes in our strategies and policies is limited to the election of directors, and changes made by our Board of Directors may not serve the interests of stockholders and could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations, including our ability to distribute cash to stockholders or qualify as a REIT.

Our rights and the rights of our stockholders to take action against our directors and officers are limited.

Maryland law provides that a director or officer has no liability in that capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be advisable and in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances. In addition, our charter (i) eliminates our directors’ and officers’ liability to us and our stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from actual receipt of an improper benefit in money, property or services or active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment and that is material to the cause of action and (ii) requires us to indemnify directors and officers for liability resulting from actions taken by them in those capacities to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. As a result, our stockholders and we may have more limited rights against our directors and officers than might otherwise exist under common law. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by our directors and officers.

We may enter into tax protection agreements in the future if we issue OP Units in connection with the acquisition of properties, which could limit our ability to sell or otherwise dispose of certain properties.

Our Operating Partnership may enter into tax protection agreements in connection with issuing OP units to acquire additional properties which could provide that, if we dispose of any interest in the protected acquired property to a certain time, we will indemnify the other party for its tax liabilities attributable to the built-in gain that exists with respect to such a property. Therefore, although it otherwise may be in our stockholders’ best interests that we sell one of these properties, it may be economically prohibitive for us to do so if we are a party to such a tax protection agreement. While we do not currently have any of these tax protection agreements in place, we may enter into such agreements in the future.


28

Our redemption of OP Units could result in the issuance of a large number of new shares of our common stock and/or force us to expend significant cash, which may limit our funds necessary to make distributions on our common stock.

As of the date of this filing, unaffiliated third parties owned approximately 1.5% of the outstanding OP Units. Following any contractual lock-up provisions, including the one-year mandatory holding period, an OP Unitholder may require us to redeem the OP Units it holds for cash. At our election, we may satisfy the redemption through the issuance of shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis. However, the limited partners’ redemption rights may not be exercised if and to the extent that the delivery of the shares upon such exercise would result in any person violating the ownership and transfer restrictions set forth in our charter. If a large number of OP Units were redeemed, it could result in the issuance of a large number of new shares of our common stock, which could dilute our existing stockholders’ ownership. Alternatively, if we were to redeem a large number of OP Units for cash, we may be required to expend significant amounts to pay the redemption price, which may limit our funds necessary to make distributions on our common stock. Further, if we do not have sufficient cash on hand at the time the OP Units are tendered for redemption, we may be forced to sell additional shares of our common stock or preferred stock to raise cash, which could cause dilution to our existing stockholders and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Our ability to pay distributions is limited by the requirements of Maryland law.

Our ability to pay distributions on our stock is limited by the laws of Maryland. Under applicable Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally may not make a distribution if, after giving effect to the distribution, the corporation would not be able to pay its debts as the debts become due in the usual course of business or the corporation’s total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus, unless the corporation’s charter permits otherwise, the amount that would be needed, if the corporation were dissolved at the time of the distribution, to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of stockholders whose preferential rights are superior to those receiving the distribution. Accordingly, we generally may not make a distribution on our stock if, after giving effect to the distribution, we would not be able to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business or our total assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus, unless the terms of such class or series provide otherwise, the amount that would be needed to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of the holders of shares of any class or series of stock then outstanding, if any, with preferences upon dissolution senior to those of such class of stock with respect to which the distribution would be made.

Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents may adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, or the operations of businesses in which we invest, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information and/or damage to our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and operating results.

In the normal course of business we and our service providers collect and retain certain personal information provided by our tenants, employees of our Administrator and Adviser, and vendors. We also rely extensively on computer systems to process transactions and manage our business. A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information resources. These incidents may be an intentional attack or an unintentional event and could involve gaining unauthorized access to our information systems for purposes of misappropriating assets, stealing confidential information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption. The result of these incidents may include disrupted operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation and damage to our business relationships. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our information systems, both internal and those provided to us by third-party service providers. We have implemented processes, procedures and internal controls to help prevent, detect and mitigate cybersecurity risks and cyber intrusions, but these measures, as well as our increased awareness of the nature and extent of a risk of a cyber-incident, do not guarantee that a cyber-incident will not occur and/or that our financial results, operations or confidential information will not be negatively impacted by such an incident.

Legislative or regulatory tax changes related to REITs could materially and adversely affect us.

The U.S. federal income tax laws and regulations governing REITs and their stockholders, as well as the administrative interpretations of those laws and regulations, constantly are under review and may be changed at any time, possibly with retroactive effect. No assurance can be given as to whether, when, or in what form, the U.S. federal income tax laws applicable to us and our stockholders may be enacted. Changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws and interpretations of U.S. federal tax laws could adversely affect an investment in our stock.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

29


Item 2. Properties.

As of December 31, 2019, we wholly-owned 118 properties, comprised of 14.2 million square feet of rentable space in 28 states. Our properties were 97.0% leased with an average remaining lease term of 7.3 years. See Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a detailed listing of the properties in our portfolio. 

The following table summarizes the lease expirations by year for our properties for leases in place as of December 31, 2019 (dollars in thousands):
 
Year of Lease Expiration
Square Feet
(1)
Number of Expiring Leases
Lease Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019
% Expiring
2020
806,886

 
8

$
9,163

8.0
%
2021
560,223

 
12

9,053

7.9
%
2022
446,457

 
8

6,646

5.8
%
2023
1,460,802

 
14

10,187

8.9
%
2024
1,740,195

 
11

12,137

10.6
%
2025+
8,793,608

 
69

63,544

55.6
%
Sold/terminated leases
 N/A

 
 N/A

3,657

3.2
%

13,808,171

 
122

$
114,387

100.0
%
(1)
Our vacant square footage totaled 433,857 square feet as of December 31, 2019.
N/A - Not Applicable

The following table summarizes the geographic locations of our properties as of December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively (dollars in thousands):
 
State
Lease Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019
% of Lease Revenue
Number of Leases for the year ended December 31, 2019
Rentable Square Feet for the year ended December 31, 2019
Lease Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018
% of Lease Revenue
Number of Leases for the year ended December 31, 2018
Rentable Square Feet for the year ended December 31, 2018
Lease Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017
% of Lease Revenue
Number of Leases for the year ended December 31, 2017
Rentable Square Feet for the year ended December 31, 2017
Texas
$
16,436

14.4
%
15

1,388,940

$
15,852

14.8
%
12

986,294

$
16,020

16.9
%
12

1,050,294

Florida
15,268

13.3

11

1,038,076

12,212

11.4

11

705,076

7,526

7.9

10

617,996

Pennsylvania
13,640

11.9

9

2,068,740

13,626

12.8

9

2,068,740

11,193

11.8

9

2,068,740

Ohio
11,016

9.6

16

1,442,990

9,969

9.3

16

1,388,560

9,169

9.7

15

1,230,750

Utah
6,978

6.1

4

298,478

6,923

6.5

3

295,499

4,156

4.4

3

295,499

Michigan
6,035

5.3

6

973,638

4,625

4.3

6

973,638

4,334

4.6

4

754,935

Georgia
5,695

5.0

8

1,062,586

4,842

4.5

6

269,555

4,667

4.9

6

269,555

North Carolina
5,666

5.0

7

894,465

6,195

5.8

8

894,465

6,112

6.4

8

894,465

South Carolina
4,638

4.1

2

424,683

4,626

4.3

2

424,683

4,627

4.9

2

424,683

Minnesota
3,790

3.3

6

281,248

3,783

3.5

6

281,248

3,734

3.9

6

281,248

All Other States
25,225

22.0

38

4,368,164

24,145

22.8

31

3,439,238

23,261

24.6

32

3,563,994

 
$
114,387

100.0
%
122

14,242,008

$
106,798

100.0
%
110

11,726,996

$
94,799

100.0
%
107

11,452,159


The following table summarizes lease revenue by tenant industries for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (dollars in thousands):
 

30

 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
Industry Classification
 
Lease Revenue
 
Percentage of Lease Revenue
 
Lease Revenue
 
Percentage of Lease Revenue
 
Lease Revenue
 
Percentage of Lease Revenue
Telecommunications
 
$
19,091

 
16.7
%
 
$
16,366

 
15.4
%
 
$
15,894

 
16.8
%
Diversified/Conglomerate Services
 
15,330

 
13.4

 
14,440

 
13.5

 
10,568

 
11.1

Automobile
 
15,115

 
13.2

 
12,930

 
12.1

 
11,230

 
11.8

Healthcare
 
13,209

 
11.5

 
12,944

 
12.1

 
13,815

 
14.6

Banking
 
7,873

 
6.9

 
8,322

 
7.8

 
3,159

 
3.3

Information Technology
 
6,154

 
5.4

 
6,106

 
5.7

 
6,127

 
6.5

Personal, Food & Miscellaneous Services
 
5,995

 
5.2

 
5,990

 
5.6

 
4,735

 
5.0

Diversified/Conglomerate Manufacturing
 
5,191

 
4.5

 
5,064

 
4.7

 
5,027

 
5.3

Electronics
 
4,539

 
4.0

 
4,289

 
4.0

 
4,323

 
4.6

Buildings and Real Estate
 
4,102

 
3.6

 
4,555

 
4.3

 
3,371

 
3.6

Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber
 
3,124

 
2.7

 
2,937

 
2.8

 
2,952

 
3.1

Machinery
 
2,816

 
2.5

 
2,278

 
2.1

 
2,278

 
2.4

Beverage, Food & Tobacco
 
2,811

 
2.5

 
1,503

 
1.4

 
2,103

 
2.2

Personal & Non-Durable Consumer Products
 
2,420

 
2.1

 
2,684

 
2.5

 
2,657

 
2.8

Childcare
 
2,225

 
1.9

 
2,224

 
2.1

 
2,225

 
2.3

Containers, Packaging & Glass
 
2,035

 
1.8

 
1,826

 
1.7

 
1,820

 
1.9

Printing & Publishing
 
1,202

 
1.1

 
1,150

 
1.1

 
1,325

 
1.4

Education
 
660

 
0.6

 
660

 
0.6

 
660

 
0.7

Home & Office Furnishings
 
495

 
0.4

 
530

 
0.5

 
530

 
0.6

Total
 
$
114,387

 
100.0
%
 
$
106,798

 
100.0
%
 
$
94,799

 
100.0
%


31

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us. However, from time to time we may be party to various litigation matters, typically involving ordinary course and routine claims incidental to our business, which we may not consider material.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq, under the symbol “GOOD.” Since our inception in 2003, we have never reduced our per-share distributions nor have we missed payment of a scheduled distribution to our common stockholders. Our Board of Directors regularly evaluates our per share distribution payments as they monitor the capital markets and the impact that the economy has upon us. The decision whether to authorize and pay distributions on shares of our common stock in the future, as well as the timing, amount and composition of any such future distributions, will be at the sole and absolute discretion of our Board of Directors in light of conditions then existing, including our earnings, taxable income, FFO, financial condition, liquidity, capital requirements, debt maturities, the availability of capital, contractual prohibitions or other restrictions, applicable REIT and legal restrictions and general overall economic conditions and other factors. While the statements above concerning our distribution policy represent our current expectations, any actual distribution payable will be determined by our Board of Directors based upon the circumstances at the time of declaration and the actual number of common shares then outstanding, and any common distribution payable may vary from such expected amounts.

To qualify as a REIT, we are required to make ordinary dividend distributions to our common stockholders. The amount of these distributions must equal at least the sum of (A) 90% of our “REIT taxable income” (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and capital gain) and (B) 90% of the net income (after tax), if any, from foreclosure property.

For federal income tax purposes, our common distributions generally consist of ordinary income, capital gains, nontaxable return of capital or a combination of those items. Distributions that exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits (calculated for tax purposes) constitute a return of capital rather than a dividend, which reduces a stockholder’s basis in its shares of stock and will not be taxable to the extent of the stockholder’s basis in its shares of our stock. To the extent a distribution exceeds the stockholder’s share of both our current and accumulated earnings and profits and the stockholder’s basis in its shares of our stock, that distribution will be treated as a gain from the sale or exchange of that stockholder’s shares of our stock. Every year, we notify stockholders of the taxability of distributions paid to stockholders during the preceding year.

A covenant in the agreement governing our Credit Facility requires us to, among other things, limit our distributions to stockholders to 98% of our FFO, excluding extraordinary or non-routine items, and continued compliance with this covenant may require us to limit our distributions to stockholders in the future. For a discussion of our Credit Facility, including the financial and operating covenants required for us to access this source of financing, see “Risk Factors – Our Credit Facility contains various covenants which, if not complied with, could accelerate our repayment obligations, thereby materially and adversely affecting our liquidity, financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay distributions to stockholders” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Credit Facility ” herein.

As of February 5, 2020, there were 24,752 beneficial owners of our common stock.

We pay distributions on shares of our Senior Common Stock in an amount equal to $1.05 per share per annum, declared daily and paid at the rate of $0.0875 per share per month. The Senior Common Stock is not traded on any exchange or automated quotation system.

As of February 5, 2020, there were 262 beneficial owners of our Senior Common Stock.

Sale of Unregistered Securities

We did not sell unregistered shares of stock during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.


32

Issuer Purchaser of Equity Securities

We did not purchase any of our equity securities in the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2019.

Stock Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative stockholder return (assuming reinvestment of distributions) of our common stock with the Standard and Poor’s 500 Index (“S&P 500”) and the FTSE NAREIT All REIT Index (“FNAR”), which is a market capitalization-weighted index that includes all REITs that are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange or the Nasdaq National Market List. The stock performance graph assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2014.
chart-15328d11f7f950ab846.jpg
 
At December 31,
 
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
GOOD
$
100.00

$
92.24

$
139.25

$
156.67

$
144.23

$
188.82

S&P 500
100.00

102.04

114.01

137.85

135.34

172.00

FNAR
100.00

102.29

111.78

122.14

117.14

150.02


Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The following selected financial data as of and for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015 is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, included elsewhere in this report, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Item 7 of this report.
 

33

 
 
For the year ended December 31,
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Operating Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total operating revenue
 
$
114,387

 
$
106,798

 
$
94,799

 
$
86,372

 
$
83,766

Total operating expenses
 
(80,231
)
 
(71,137
)
 
(68,337
)
 
(55,595
)
 
(50,965
)
Other expense, net
 
(24,615
)
 
(23,337
)
 
(20,525
)
 
(26,819
)
 
(29,205
)
Net income
 
$
9,541

 
$
12,324

 
$
5,937

 
$
3,958

 
$
3,596

Dividends attributable to preferred stock
 
(10,822
)
 
(10,416
)
 
(9,890
)
 
(6,645
)
 
(4,094
)
Series A and Series B Preferred Stock offering costs write off
 
(2,674
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Dividends attributable to Senior Common Stock
 
(892
)
 
(931
)
 
(986
)
 
(1,011
)
 
(1,007
)
Net (loss) income (attributable) available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders
 
$
(4,847
)
 
$
977

 
$
(4,939
)
 
$
(3,698
)
 
$
(1,505
)
Share and Per Share Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Loss) income per weighted average common share and Non-controlling OP Unit- basic & diluted
 
$
(0.16
)
 
$
0.03

 
$
(0.19
)
 
$
(0.16
)
 
$
(0.07
)
Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic & diluted
 
30,695,902

 
28,675,934

 
26,358,237

 
23,193,962

 
21,159,597

Weighted average Non-controlling OP Units outstanding
 
700,924

 
128,233

 
—

 
—

 
—

Weighted average common shares and Non-controlling OP Units outstanding
 
31,396,826

 
28,804,167

 
26,358,237

 
23,193,962

 
21,159,597

Cash dividends declared per common share and Non-controlling OP Unit
 
$
1.50

 
$
1.50

 
$
1.50

 
$
1.50

 
$
1.50

Supplemental Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net (loss) income (attributable) available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders
 
$
(4,847
)
 
$
977

 
$
(4,939
)
 
$
(3,698
)
 
$
(1,505
)
Add: Real estate depreciation and amortization
 
52,039

 
47,620

 
42,795

 
37,517

 
35,288

Add: Impairment charge
 
1,813

 
—

 
6,835

 
2,016

 
622

Less: Gain on sale of real estate, net
 
(2,952
)
 
(2,763
)
 
(3,993
)
 
(242
)
 
(1,538
)
Funds from operations available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders (1)
 
$
46,053

 
$
45,834

 
$
40,698

 
$
35,593

 
$
32,867

Add: Series A and B Preferred Stock offering costs write off
 
2,674

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Funds from operations available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders, as adjusted for comparability (1)
 
$
48,727

 
$
45,834

 
$
40,698

 
$
35,593

 
$
32,867

Balance Sheet Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate, held for use, before accumulated depreciation
 
$
1,056,978

 
$
946,649

 
$
893,853

 
$
821,749

 
$
708,377

Total assets (2)
 
$
1,039,508

 
$
938,775

 
$
928,454

 
$
851,742

 
$
827,184

Mortgage notes payable, net, term preferred stock, net, term loan facility, net & revolving credit facility, net (2)
 
$
626,594

 
$
566,059

 
$
542,627

 
$
509,395

 
$
563,432

Total equity and mezzanine equity
 
$
363,190

 
$
340,017

 
$
350,230

 
$
310,620

 
$
233,871

Total common shares outstanding
 
32,593,651

 
29,254,899

 
28,384,016

 
24,882,758

 
22,485,607

Total Non-controlling OP Units outstanding
 
479,637

 
742,937

 
—

 
—

 
—

Total common shares and Non-controlling OP Units outstanding
 
33,073,288

 
29,997,836

 
28,384,016

 
24,882,758

 
22,485,607


34

(1)
The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) developed FFO as a relevant non-GAAP supplemental measure of operating performance of an equity REIT, to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the same basis determined under GAAP. FFO, as defined by NAREIT, is net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of property and impairment losses on property, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. FFO does not represent cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, which, unlike FFO, generally reflects all cash effects of transactions and other events in the determination of net income and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance or to cash flows from operations as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. Comparison of FFO, using the NAREIT definition, to similarly titled measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in the application of the NAREIT definition used by such REITs.
(2)
We adopted ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (“ASU-2015-03”) during the year ended December 31, 2016, which requires the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of a deferred financing cost. All periods presented have been adjusted retroactively.

FFO available to common stockholders and holders of Non-controlling interests in the Operating Partnership (“Non-controlling OP Unitholders”) is FFO adjusted to subtract preferred share and Senior Common Stock share distributions. We believe that net loss attributable to common stockholders is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO available to the aggregate of our common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders.

Basic funds from operations per share (“Basic FFO per share”), and diluted funds from operations per share (“Diluted FFO per share”), is FFO available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders divided by the number of weighted average shares of the aggregate of shares of common stock and OP Units held by Non-controlling OP Unitholders outstanding and FFO available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders divided by the number of weighted average shares of the aggregate of shares of common stock and OP Units held by Non-controlling OP Units outstanding on a diluted basis, respectively, during a period. We believe that net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO, Basic EPS is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to Basic FFO per share, and that Diluted EPS is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to Diluted FFO per share.

We also present FFO available to our common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders as adjusted for comparability as an additional supplemental measure, as we believe it is more reflective of our core operating performance, and provides investors and analysts an additional measure to compare our performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis by excluding items that we do not believe are indicative of our core operating performance. FFO as adjusted for comparability is generally calculated as FFO available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders, excluding certain non-recurring and non-cash income and expense adjustments, which management believes are not reflective of the results within our operating real estate portfolio.

The following table provides a reconciliation of our FFO and FFO as adjusted for comparability for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015 to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net income (loss), and a computation of basic and diluted FFO and diluted FFO as adjusted for comparability per weighted average total share:
 
 
 
For the twelve months ended December 31,
 
 
(Dollars in Thousands, Except for Per Share Amounts)
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Calculation of basic FFO per share of common stock and Non-controlling OP Unit
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
9,541

 
$
12,324

 
$
5,937

 
$
3,958

 
$
3,596

Less: Distributions attributable to preferred and senior common stock
 
(14,388
)
 
(11,347
)
 
(10,876
)
 
(7,656
)
 
(5,101
)
Net (loss) income (attributable) available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders
 
$
(4,847
)
 
$
977

 
$
(4,939
)
 
$
(3,698
)
 
$
(1,505
)
Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Add: Real estate depreciation and amortization
 
52,039

 
47,620

 
42,795

 
37,517

 
35,288

Add: Impairment charge
 
1,813

 
—

 
6,835

 
2,016

 
622

Less: Gain on sale of real estate, net
 
(2,952
)
 
(2,763
)
 
(3,993
)
 
(242
)
 
(1,538
)

35

FFO available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders - basic
 
$
46,053

 
$
45,834

 
$
40,698

 
$
35,593

 
$
32,867

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic
 
30,695,902

 
28,675,934

 
26,358,237

 
23,193,962

 
21,159,597

Weighted average Non-controlling OP Units outstanding
 
700,924

 
128,233

 
—

 
—

 
—

Total common shares and Non-controlling OP Units
 
31,396,826

 
28,804,167

 
26,358,237

 
23,193,962

 
21,159,597

Basic FFO per weighted average share of common stock and Non-controlling OP Unit
 
$
1.47

 
$
1.59

 
$
1.54

 
$
1.53

 
$
1.55

Calculation of diluted FFO per share of common stock and Non-controlling OP Unit
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
9,541

 
$
12,324

 
$
5,937

 
$
3,958

 
$
3,596

Less: Distributions attributable to preferred and senior common stock
 
(14,388
)
 
(11,347
)
 
(10,876
)
 
(7,656
)
 
(5,101
)
Net (loss) income (attributable) available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders
 
$
(4,847
)
 
$
977

 
$
(4,939
)
 
$
(3,698
)
 
$
(1,505
)
Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Add: Real estate depreciation and amortization
 
52,039

 
47,620

 
42,795

 
37,517

 
35,288

Add: Impairment charge
 
1,813

 
—

 
6,835

 
2,016

 
622

Add: Income impact of assumed conversion of senior common stock
 
892

 
931

 
986

 
1,011

 
1,007

Less: Gain on sale of real estate, net
 
(2,952
)
 
(2,763
)
 
(3,993
)
 
(242
)
 
(1,538
)
FFO available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders plus assumed conversions
 
$
46,945

 
$
46,765

 
$
41,684

 
$
36,604

 
$
33,874

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic
 
30,695,902

 
28,675,934

 
26,358,237

 
23,193,962

 
21,159,597

Weighted average Non-controlling OP Units outstanding
 
700,924

 
128,233

 
—

 
—

 
—

Effect of convertible senior common stock
 
674,611

 
724,336

 
753,881

 
800,116

 
782,957

Weighted average common shares and Non-controlling OP Units outstanding - diluted
 
32,071,437

 
29,528,503

 
27,112,118

 
23,994,078

 
21,942,554

Diluted FFO per weighted average share of common stock and Non-controlling OP Unit (1)
 
$
1.46

 
$
1.58

 
$
1.54

 
$
1.53

 
$
1.54

Calculation of diluted FFO per share of common stock and Non-controlling OP Unit, as adjusted for comparability
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FFO available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders plus assumed conversions
 
$
46,945

 
$
46,765

 
$
41,684

 
$
36,604

 
$
33,874

Add: Series A and B preferred stock offering costs write off
 
2,674

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

FFO available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders plus assumed conversions, as adjusted for comparability
 
$
49,619

 
$
46,765

 
$
41,684

 
$
36,604

 
$
33,874

Weighted average common shares and Non-controlling OP Units outstanding - diluted
 
32,071,437

 
29,528,503

 
27,112,118

 
23,994,078

 
21,942,554

Diluted FFO per weighted average share of common stock and Non-controlling OP Unit, as adjusted for comparability (1)
 
$
1.55

 
$
1.58

 
$
1.54

 
$
1.53

 
$
1.54

Distributions declared per share of common stock and Non-controlling OP Unit
 
$
1.50

 
$
1.50

 
$
1.50

 
$
1.50

 
$
1.50

 
(1)
Diluted FFO available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders was not previously adjusted for the income impact of the assumed conversion of Senior Common Stock, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260, (“Earnings per Share”). This adjustment has increased Diluted FFO available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders for the year ended December 31, 2015 by $0.04 per share.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

General


36

We are an externally-advised REIT that was incorporated under the General Corporation Law of the State of Maryland on February 14, 2003. We focus on acquiring, owning, and managing primarily office and industrial properties. On a selective basis, we may make long term industrial and office mortgage loans; however, we do not have any mortgage loans receivable currently outstanding. Our properties are geographically diversified and our tenants cover a broad cross section of business sectors and range in size from small to very large private and public companies, many of which are corporations that do not have publicly-rated debt. We have historically entered into, and intend in the future to enter into, purchase agreements primarily for real estate having net leases with remaining terms of approximately seven to 15 years and built in rental rate increases Under a net lease, the tenant is required to pay most or all operating, maintenance, repair and insurance costs and real estate taxes with respect to the leased property.

We actively communicate with buyout funds, real estate brokers and other third parties to locate properties for potential acquisition or to provide mortgage financing in an effort to build our portfolio. We target secondary growth markets that possess favorable economic growth trends, diversified industries, and growing population and employment.

All references to annualized generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) rent are rents that each tenant pays in accordance with the terms of its respective lease reported evenly over the non-cancelable term of the lease.

As of February 12, 2020:
 
•
we owned 122 properties totaling 14.6 million square feet of rentable space in 28 states;
•
our occupancy rate was 97.0%;
•
the weighted average remaining term of our mortgage debt was 5.2 years and the weighted average interest rate was 4.4%; and
•
the average remaining lease term of the portfolio was 7.2 years;

Business Environment

In the U.S. vacancy rates have decreased for both office and industrial properties in most markets, as increased user demand has led to improved conditions. Vacancy rates in many markets have been reduced to levels last seen at the peak before the most recent U.S. recession and rental rates have increased in most primary and secondary markets. Reports from national research firms reflect that the industrial supply and demand relationship still appears to be in equilibrium, but that office supply and demand in select markets may be moving towards a slight increase in vacancy. Interest rates have been volatile and although interest rates are still low by historical standards, lenders have varied on their required spreads over the last several quarters; however, they appear to have somewhat stabilized with recent Federal Reserve announcements. Third quarter 2019 statistics reflect that single property listings and investment sales volume are lower as compared to the prior year’s same period. Additionally, preliminary research data suggests that the fourth quarter 2019 investment volume may be less than that of the same quarter for 2018. Completing the eleventh year of the current cycle, some national research firms are estimating that both pricing and investment sales volume may be peaking, with the possible exception of industrial properties.   

From a macro-economic perspective, the strength of the global economy and U.S. economy continue to be uncertain. The long-term impact of tax reform in the U.S. continues to be unknown at this time, although the lowering of the corporate tax rate is generally expected to be beneficial and the overall U.S. economy appears to be healthy. Finally, the continuing uncertainty surrounding the ability of the federal government to address its fiscal condition in both the near and long term as well as other geo-political issues has increased domestic and global instability. These developments could cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may adversely affect our ability to access both the equity and debt markets and could have an adverse effect on our tenants as well.

All of our variable rate debt is based upon the one month LIBOR rate, although LIBOR is currently anticipated to be phased out during late 2021. LIBOR is expected to transition to a new standard rate, SOFR, which will incorporate repo data collected from multiple data sets. The intent is to adjust the SOFR to minimize differences between the interest that a borrower would be paying using LIBOR versus what it will be paying using SOFR. We are currently monitoring the transition, as we cannot assess whether SOFR will become a standard rate for variable rate debt. Any further changes or reforms to the determination or supervision of LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR, which could have an adverse impact on the market for LIBOR-based debt, or the value of our portfolio of LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt.

We continue to focus on re-leasing vacant space, renewing upcoming lease expirations, re-financing upcoming loan maturities, and acquiring additional properties with associated long-term leases. Currently, we only have two partially vacant buildings and three fully vacant buildings, with one of these fully vacant buildings classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2019.


37

We have eight leases expiring in 2020, which account for 8.0% of lease revenue recognized during the year ended December 31, 2019, 12 leases expiring in 2021, which account for 7.9% of lease revenue recognized during the year ended December 31, 2019, and eight leases expiring in 2022, which account for 5.8% of lease revenue recognized during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Our available vacant space at December 31, 2019 represents 3.0% of our total square footage and the annual carrying costs on the vacant space, including real estate taxes and property operating expenses, are approximately $1.1 million. We continue to actively seek new tenants for these properties.

Our ability to make new investments is highly dependent upon our ability to procure financing. Our principal sources of financing generally include the issuance of equity securities, long-term mortgage loans secured by properties, and borrowings under our Credit Facility. While lenders’ credit standards have tightened, we continue to look to national and regional banks, insurance companies and non-bank lenders, in addition to the CMBS market, to issue mortgages to finance our real estate activities.

In addition to obtaining funds through borrowing, we were active in the equity markets during 2019 by issuing shares of common stock under our ATM Programs, pursuant to our Common Stock Sales Agreement with the Common Stock Sales Agents, discussed in more detail below, and formerly with Cantor. We also completed an underwritten public offering for our newly designated Series E Preferred stock and entered into an at-the-market program for the Series E Preferred Stock pursuant to our Series E Preferred Stock Sales Agreement with the Series E Preferred Stock Sales Agents.

Recent Developments

2019 Sale Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we continued to execute our capital recycling program, whereby we sell non-core properties and redeploy proceeds to fund property acquisitions in our target secondary growth markets, as well as repay outstanding debt. We will continue to execute our capital recycling plan and sell non-core properties as reasonable disposition opportunities become available. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold one non-core property, located in Maitland, Florida, which is detailed in the table below (dollars in thousands):

Aggregate Square Footage Sold
 
Sales Price
 
Sales Costs
 
Gain on Sale of Real Estate, net
50,000

 
$
6,850

 
$
532

 
$
2,952


2019 Acquisition Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we acquired 18 properties, which are summarized below (dollars in thousands):

Aggregate Square Footage
 
Weighted Average Lease Term
 
Aggregate Purchase Price
 
Acquisition Costs
 
Aggregate Annualized GAAP Rent
 
Aggregate Mortgage Debt Issued or Assumed
2,562,483

 
12.8 Years
 
$
130,313


$
1,231

 
$
10,009

 
$
37,410


On January 8, 2020, we purchased a 64,800 square foot industrial property in Indianapolis, Indiana for $5.3 million. This property is fully leased to three tenants with a weighted average lease term of 7.2 years.

On January 27, 2020, we purchased a 320,838 square foot, three building industrial portfolio with location in Houston, Texas; Charlotte, North Carolina; and St. Charles, Missouri for $34.7 million. This industrial portfolio is fully leased to one tenant on a 20 year lease term.

2019 Leasing Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we executed six lease extensions and/or modifications, which are summarized below (dollars in thousands):


38

Aggregate Square Footage
 
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term
 
Aggregate Annualized GAAP Rent
 
Aggregate Tenant Improvement
 
Aggregate Leasing Commissions
266,021

 
9.0 years
(1)
$
3,739

 
$
2,215

 
$
1,312

(1)
Weighted average lease term is weighted according to the annualized GAAP rent earned by each lease. Our leases have terms ranging from 5.0 years to 11.5 years.

On January 9, 2020, a tenant in one of our Springfield, Missouri properties renewed their lease for an additional five years, with a new maturity date of May 31, 2026.

On January 23, 2020, the tenant in our Englewood, Colorado property renewed their lease for an additional five years, with a new maturity date of December 31, 2026

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we had three lease contractions, which are aggregated below (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended
 
Aggregate Square Footage Reduced
 
Aggregate Square Footage Remaining
 
Aggregate Termination Fee
December 31, 2019
(1)
111,309

 
39,417
 
$
301

(1)
A tenant in one of our Columbus, Ohio properties exercised a lease termination option effective October 31, 2019. In connection with this termination, we earned a termination fee of $0.1 million, which was recognized through lease revenue on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The tenant in our Fridley, Minnesota property executed a termination agreement to vacate the property on March 31, 2020. In connection with the early termination, we will earn a termination fee of $0.2 million, which is recognized through lease revenue on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income through the remaining lease term. The tenant in one of our Mason, Ohio properties executed a lease contraction in conjunction with a lease renewal. At the conclusion of their current lease term on June 30, 2020, they will continue to lease 39,417 square feet through June 30, 2030.

2019 Financing Activity

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we partially repaid one mortgage collateralized by three properties, releasing one of the collateralized properties that we sold on January 31, 2019, and fully repaid four mortgages collateralized by eight properties, all of which are summarized below (dollars in thousands):
Aggregate Fixed Rate Debt Repaid
 
Weighted Average Interest Rate on Fixed Rate Debt Repaid
$
31,385

 
4.55
%

Aggregate Variable Rate Debt Repaid
 
Weighted Average Interest Rate on Variable Rate Debt Repaid
$
13,600

 
LIBOR +
2.47%

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we issued 11 mortgages, collateralized by 11 properties, which are summarized below (dollars in thousands):

Aggregate Fixed Rate Debt Issued
 
Weighted Average Interest Rate on Fixed Rate Debt
$
69,650

(1)
3.90
%


39

(1)
We issued $10.6 million of fixed rate debt in connection with one property acquired on December 27, 2018, with a maturity date of February 8, 2029. The interest rate is fixed at 4.7% for the first seven years of the mortgage. After the fixed interest rate period expires, we have the option to adjust the interest rate to a fixed interest rate equal to 1.8%, plus the three-year treasury rate per annum, or a variable interest rate equal to 1.8%, plus the 30 day LIBOR rate per annum. On May 31, 2019, we issued $21.6 million of floating rate debt swapped to fixed rate debt of 3.42% in connection with refinancing mortgage debt on one property with a new maturity date of June 1, 2024. We issued $8.9 million of fixed rate debt in connection with our June 18, 2019 property acquisition with a maturity date of June 18, 2024 and a rate of 4.35%. We issued $4.8 million of fixed rate debt in connection with our December 16, 2019 property acquisition with a maturity date of December 10, 2026 and a rate of 3.97%. We issued $4.2 million of fixed rate debt in connection with our December 17, 2019 property acquisition with a maturity date of December 17, 2026 and a rate of 3.97%. We issued an aggregate of $19.5 million of fixed rate debt in connection with our six property portfolio acquisition December 17, 2019, with a maturity date of January 1, 2027 and a rate of 3.75%.

On January 27, 2020, we issued an aggregate of $18.3 million of fixed rate debt in connection with the three property industrial portfolio acquired on this same date. The maturity date is February 1, 2030 and the interest rate is 3.625%.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we extended the maturity dates of two mortgages, collateralized by four properties, which are summarized below (dollars in thousands):

Aggregate Variable Rate Debt Extended
 
Weighted Average Interest Rate on Variable Rate Debt Extended
 
Weighted Average Extension Term
$
12,561

 
LIBOR +
2.51%
 
2.4 years

On July 2, 2019, we amended, extended and upsized our Credit Facility, increasing the Term Loan from $75.0 million to $160.0 million, inclusive of a delayed Term Loan draw component whereby we can incrementally borrow on the Term Loan up to the $160.0 million commitment, and increasing the Revolver from $85.0 million to $100.0 million. The Term Loan has a new five-year term, with a maturity date of July 2, 2024, and the Revolver has a new four-year term, with a maturity date of July 2, 2023. The interest rate for the Credit Facility was reduced by 10 basis points at each of the leverage tiers. We entered into multiple interest rate cap agreements on the amended Term Loan, which cap LIBOR ranging from 2.50% to 2.75%, to hedge our exposure to variable interest rates. We used the net proceeds derived from the amended Credit Facility to repay all previously existing borrowings under the Revolver. We incurred fees of approximately $1.3 million in connection with the Credit Facility amendment. The bank syndicate is now comprised of KeyBank, Fifth Third Bank, U.S. Bank National Association, The Huntington National Bank, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo Bank”).

2019 Equity Activities

Common Stock ATM Program

On December 3, 2019, we entered into the Common Stock Sales Agreement, with the Common Stock Sales Agents, pursuant to which we may sell shares of our common stock in an aggregate offering price of up to $250.0 million. Previously, we had a common stock ATM program with Cantor that was terminated upon entering into the Common Stock Sales Agreement. Under these programs, during the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold 3.0 million shares of common stock, raising $64.5 million in net proceeds. As of December 31, 2019, we had a remaining capacity to sell up to $237.5 million of common stock under the Common Stock Sales Agreement. The proceeds from these issuances were used to acquire real estate, repay outstanding debt and for other general corporate purposes.

Series A and B Preferred Stock ATM Programs

Previously, under another open market sales agreement with Cantor (the “Series A and B Preferred ATM Program”), we could, from time to time, offer to sell (i) shares of our 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”), and (ii) shares of our 7.50% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred Stock”), having an aggregate offering price of up to $40.0 million, through Cantor, acting as sales agent and/or principal. We did not sell any shares of our Series A or Series B Preferred Stock during the year ended December 31, 2019.

On October 28, 2019, we terminated the Series A and B Preferred ATM Program with Cantor, as the Series A Preferred and Series B Preferred were fully redeemed on this date.


40

Series A and B Preferred Stock Redemption

On October 28, 2019, we voluntarily redeemed all 1,000,000 outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and all 1,264,000 outstanding shares of our Series B Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $25.1506944 per share and $25.1458333 per share, respectively, which represented the liquidation preference per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends through October 28, 2019 for an aggregate redemption price of approximately $56.9 million. In connection with this redemption, we recognized a $2.7 million decrease to net income available to common shareholders pertaining to the original issuance costs incurred upon issuance of our Series A and B Preferred stock.

Mezzanine Equity

Both our Series D Preferred Stock, and Series E Preferred Stock are classified as mezzanine equity in our consolidated balance sheet because both are redeemable at the option of the shareholder upon a change of control of greater than 50% in accordance with ASC 480-10-S99 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity,” which requires mezzanine equity classification for preferred stock issuances with redemption features which are outside of the control of the issuer. A change in control of our company, outside of our control, is only possible if a tender offer is accepted by over 90% of our shareholders. All other change in control situations would require input from our Board of Directors. In addition, our Series E Preferred Stock is redeemable at the option of the shareholder in the event a delisting event occurs. We will periodically evaluate the likelihood that a change of control or delisting event of greater than 50% will take place, and if we deem this probable, we would adjust the Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock presented in mezzanine equity to their redemption value, with the offset to gain (loss) on extinguishment. We currently believe the likelihood of a change of control of greater than 50% is remote.

Under a third open market sales agreement with Cantor (the “Series D Preferred ATM Program”), we could, from time to time, offer to sell shares of our Series D Preferred Stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million through Cantor, acting as sales agent and/or principal. We did not sell any Series D Preferred stock during the year ended December 31, 2019. We have not allocated any funds on our Universal Shelf (defined below) towards the Series D Preferred ATM Program.

Series E Preferred Stock

On October 4, 2019, we completed an underwritten public offering of 2,760,000 shares of our newly designated Series E Preferred Stock at a public offering price of $25.00 per share, raising $69.0 million in gross proceeds and approximately $66.6 million in net proceeds, after payment of underwriting discounts and commissions. We used the net proceeds from this offering to redeem all outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock, and pay down our Credit Facility.

On December 3, 2019, we entered into the Series E Preferred Stock Sales Agreement with the Series E Preferred Stock Sales Agents, pursuant to which we may, from time to time, offer to sell shares of our Series E Preferred Stock in an aggregate offering price of up to $100.0 million. We did not sell any shares of our Series E Preferred Stock pursuant to the Series E Preferred Stock Sales Agreement during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation

On April 11, 2018, we filed with the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation an Articles Supplementary reclassifying 3,500,000 authorized but unissued shares of our convertible senior common stock (the “Senior Common Stock”), as authorized but unissued shares of our common stock. As a result of the reclassification, there were 57,969 authorized but unissued shares of Senior Common Stock.

On April 11, 2018, we also filed with the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation an Articles of Amendment to increase the number of shares of capital stock we have authority to issue to 100,000,000 and authorized common stock to 87,700,000 shares.

On September 27, 2019, the Company filed with the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation the Articles Supplementary (i) setting forth the rights, preferences and terms of its newly designated Series E Preferred Stock and (ii) reclassifying and designating 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s authorized and unissued shares of common stock as shares of Series E Preferred Stock. The reclassification decreased the number of shares classified as common stock from 87,700,000 shares immediately prior to the reclassification to 83,700,000 shares immediately after the reclassification.


41

On December 2, 2019, the Company filed with the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation the Articles Supplementary reclassifying 2,600,000 authorized but unissued shares of our Series A Preferred Sock as 2,590,000 shares of our Common Stock and 10,000 shares of our Series E Preferred Stock, and reclassifying 2,750,000 authorized but unissued shares of our Series B Preferred Stock as 2,750,000 shares of our Series E Preferred Stock. After giving effect to such reclassifications, we have authorized 86,290,000 shares of common stock, 6,000,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock, 6,760,000 shares of Series E Preferred Stock and 950,000 shares of Senior Common Stock.

Universal Shelf Registration Statement

On January 11, 2019, we filed a universal registration statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-229209, and an amendment thereto on Form-S-3/A on January 24, 2019 (collectively referred to as the “Universal Shelf”). The Universal Shelf became effective on February 13, 2019 and replaced our prior universal shelf registration statement. The Universal Shelf allows us to issue up to $500.0 million of securities. As of December 31, 2019, we had the ability to issue up to $438.0 million under the Universal Shelf.

On January 29, 2020, we filed a universal registration statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-236143 (the “2020 Universal Shelf”). Upon its effectiveness, the 2020 Universal Shelf will allow us to issue up to $800.0 million of securities.

Non-controlling Interests in Operating Partnership

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, we owned approximately 98.6% and 97.5%, respectively, of the outstanding OP Units. On October 30, 2018, we issued 742,937 OP units as partial consideration to acquire a 218,703 square foot, two property portfolio located in Detroit, Michigan for $21.7 million. During November 2019, 263,300 OP units were redeemed for common stock.

The Operating Partnership is required to make distributions on each OP Unit in the same amount as those paid on each share of the Company’s common stock, with the distributions on the OP Units held by the Company being utilized to make distributions to the Company’s common stockholders.

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were 479,637 and 742,937 outstanding OP Units held by Non-controlling OP Unitholders,
respectively.

On January 8, 2020, we issued 23,396 additional OP Units in connection with the Indianapolis, Indiana acquisition that was completed on the same date.

Our Adviser and Administrator

Our Adviser is led by a management team with extensive experience purchasing real estate and originating mortgage loans. Our Adviser and Administrator are controlled by Mr. David Gladstone, who is also our chairman and chief executive officer. Mr. Gladstone also serves as the chairman and chief executive officer of both our Adviser and Administrator. Mr. Terry Lee Brubaker, our vice chairman and chief operating officer, is also the vice chairman and chief operating officer of our Adviser and Administrator. Mr. Robert Cutlip, our president, is also an executive managing director of our Adviser. The Administrator employs our chief financial officer, treasurer, chief compliance officer, and general counsel and secretary (who also serves as our Administrator’s president, general counsel, and secretary) and their respective staffs.

Our Adviser and Administrator also provide investment advisory and administrative services, respectively, to certain of our affiliates, including, but not limited to, Gladstone Capital and Gladstone Investment, both publicly-traded business development companies, as well as Gladstone Land, a publicly-traded REIT that primarily invests in farmland. With the exception of Mr. Michael Sodo, our chief financial officer, Mr. Jay Beckhorn, our treasurer, and Mr. Robert Cutlip, our president, all of our executive officers and all of our directors serve as either directors or executive officers, or both, of Gladstone Capital and Gladstone Investment. In addition, with the exception of Mr. Cutlip and Mr. Sodo, all of our executive officers and all of our directors, serve as either directors or executive officers, or both, of Gladstone Land. Mr. Cutlip and Mr. Sodo generally spend all of their time focused on Gladstone Commercial, and do not put forth any material efforts in assisting affiliated companies. In the future, our Adviser may provide investment advisory services to other companies, both public and private.

Advisory and Administration Agreements

Many of the services performed by our Adviser and Administrator in managing our day-to-day activities are summarized below. This summary is provided to illustrate the material functions which our Adviser and Administrator perform for us pursuant to the terms of the Advisory and Administration Agreements, respectively.


42

Advisory Agreement

Under the terms of the Advisory Agreement we are responsible for all expenses incurred for our direct benefit. Examples of these expenses include legal, accounting, interest, directors’ and officers’ insurance, stock transfer services, stockholder-related fees, consulting and related fees. In addition, we are also responsible for all fees charged by third parties that are directly related to our business, which include real estate brokerage fees, mortgage placement fees, lease-up fees and transaction structuring fees (although we may be able to pass some or all of such fees on to our tenants and borrowers).

Base Management Fee

On January 8, 2019, we entered into a Fifth Amended and Restated Investment Advisory Agreement with the Adviser, effective as of October 1, 2018 to clarify that the agreement’s definition of Total Equity includes outstanding OP Units issued to Non-controlling OP Unitholders. Our entrance into the Advisory Agreement and each amendment thereto has been approved unanimously by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors reviews and considers renewing the agreement with our Adviser each July. During its July 2019 meeting, our Board of Directors reviewed and renewed the Advisory Agreement for an additional year, through August 31, 2020.

Under the Advisory Agreement, the calculation of the annual base management fee equals 1.5% of our Total Equity, which is our total stockholders’ equity plus total mezzanine equity (before giving effect to the base management fee and incentive fee), adjusted to exclude the effect of any unrealized gains or losses that do not affect realized net income (including impairment charges), adjusted for any one-time events and certain non-cash items (the later to occur for a given quarter only upon the approval of our Compensation Committee), and adjusted to include OP Units held by Non-controlling OP Unitholders. The fee is calculated and accrued quarterly as 0.375% per quarter of such adjusted total stockholders’ equity figure. Our Adviser does not charge acquisition or disposition fees when we acquire or dispose of properties as is common in other externally managed REITs; however, our Adviser may earn fee income from our borrowers, tenants or other sources.

Incentive Fee

Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the calculation of the incentive fee rewards the Adviser in circumstances where our quarterly Core FFO (defined at the end of this paragraph), before giving effect to any incentive fee, or pre-incentive fee Core FFO, exceeds 2.0% quarterly, or 8.0% annualized, of adjusted total equity (after giving effect to the base management fee but before giving effect to the incentive fee). We refer to this as the new hurdle rate. The Adviser will receive 15.0% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee Core FFO that exceeds the new hurdle rate. However, in no event shall the incentive fee for a particular quarter exceed by 15.0% (the cap) the average quarterly incentive fee paid by us for the previous four quarters (excluding quarters for which no incentive fee was paid). Core FFO (as defined in the Advisory Agreement) is GAAP net income (loss) available to common stockholders, excluding the incentive fee, depreciation and amortization, any realized and unrealized gains, losses or other non-cash items recorded in net income (loss) available to common stockholders for the period, and one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP.

Capital Gain Fee

Under the Advisory Agreement, we will pay to the Adviser a capital gains-based incentive fee that will be calculated and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the Advisory Agreement). In determining the capital gain fee, we will calculate aggregate realized capital gains and aggregate realized capital losses for the applicable time period. For this purpose, aggregate realized capital gains and losses, if any, equals the realized gain or loss calculated by the difference between the sales price of the property, less any costs to sell the property and the all-in acquisition cost of the disposed property. At the end of the fiscal year, if this number is positive, then the capital gain fee payable for such time period shall equal 15.0% of such amount. No capital gain fee was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017.

Termination Fee

The Advisory Agreement includes a termination fee whereby, in the event of our termination of the agreement without cause (with 120 days’ prior written notice and the vote of at least two-thirds of our independent directors), a termination fee would be payable to the Adviser equal to two times the sum of the average annual base management fee and incentive fee earned by the Adviser during the 24-month period prior to such termination. A termination fee is also payable if the Adviser terminates the Advisory Agreement after the Company has defaulted and applicable cure periods have expired. The agreement may also be terminated for cause by us (with 30 days’ prior written notice and the vote of at least two-thirds of our independent directors), with no termination fee payable. Cause is defined in the agreement to include if the Adviser breaches any material provisions of the agreement, the bankruptcy or insolvency of the Adviser, dissolution of the Adviser and fraud or misappropriation of funds.

43


Administration Agreement

Under the terms of the Administration Agreement, we pay separately for our allocable portion of our Administrator’s overhead expenses in performing its obligations to us including, but not limited to, rent and our allocable portion of the salaries and benefits expenses of our Administrator’s employees, including, but not limited to, our chief financial officer, treasurer, chief compliance officer, general counsel and secretary (who also serves as our Administrator’s president, general counsel and secretary), and their respective staffs. Our allocable portion of the Administrator’s expenses are generally derived by multiplying our Administrator’s total expenses by the approximate percentage of time the Administrator’s employees perform services for us in relation to their time spent performing services for all companies serviced by our Administrator under contractual agreements. We believe that the methodology of allocating the Administrator’s total expenses by approximate percentage of time services were performed among all companies serviced by our Administrator more closely approximates fees paid to actual services performed.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP, requires management to make judgments that are subjective in nature to make certain estimates and assumptions. Application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment regarding the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties, and as a result, actual results could materially differ from these estimates. A summary of all of our significant accounting policies is provided in Note 1, “Organization, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies,” to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as a summary of recently issued accounting pronouncements and their expected impact to our current and future financial statements. There were no material changes to our critical accounting policies during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Allocation of Purchase Price

When we acquire real estate with an existing lease, we allocate the purchase price to (i) the acquired tangible assets and liabilities, consisting of land, building, tenant improvements and long-term debt and (ii) the identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, in-place leases, unamortized lease origination costs, tenant relationships and capital lease obligations. We adopted ASU 2017-01 and allocate the fair values in accordance with ASC 360, Property Plant and Equipment. All expenses related to the acquisition are capitalized and allocated among the identified assets.

Our Adviser estimates value using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis). Factors considered by management in its analysis include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods, considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. Our Adviser also considers information obtained about each property as a result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired. In estimating carrying costs, management also includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the hypothetical expected lease-up periods, which primarily range from nine to 18 months, depending on specific local market conditions. Our Adviser also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses to the extent that such costs are not already incurred in connection with a new lease origination as part of the transaction. Our Adviser also considers the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and management’s expectations of lease renewals (including those existing under the terms of the lease agreement), among other factors. A change in any of the assumptions above, which are very subjective, could have a material impact on our results of operations.

The allocation of the purchase price directly affects the following in our consolidated financial statements:
 
•
The amount of purchase price allocated to the various tangible and intangible assets and liabilities on our balance sheet;

•
The amounts allocated to the value of above-market and below-market lease values are amortized to rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. The amounts allocated to all other tangible and intangible assets are amortized to depreciation or amortization expense. Thus, depending on the amounts allocated between land and other depreciable assets, changes in the purchase price allocation among our assets could have a material impact on our FFO, a metric which is used by many REIT investors to evaluate our operating performance; and


44

•
The period of time over which tangible and intangible assets are depreciated varies greatly, and thus, changes in the amounts allocated to these assets will have a direct impact on our results of operations. Intangible assets are generally amortized over the respective life of the leases, which normally range from 10 to 15 years. Also, we depreciate our buildings over up to 39 years, but do not depreciate our land. These differences in timing could have a material impact on our results of operations.

Asset Impairment Evaluation

We periodically review the carrying value of each property to determine if circumstances that indicate impairment in the carrying value of the investment exist or that depreciation periods should be modified. In determining if impairment exists, our Adviser considers such factors as our tenants’ payment histories, the financial condition of our tenants, including calculating the current leverage ratios of tenants, the likelihood of lease renewal, business conditions in the industries in which our tenants operate, whether the fair value of our real estate has decreased and whether our hold period has shortened. If any of the factors above indicate the possibility of impairment, we prepare a projection of the undiscounted future cash flows, without interest charges, of the specific property and determine if the carrying amount of such property is recoverable. In preparing the projection of undiscounted future cash flows, we estimate cap rates using information that we obtain from market comparability studies and other comparable sources, and apply the undiscounted cash flows against our expected holding period. If impairment were indicated, the carrying value of the property would be written down to its estimated fair value based on our best estimate of the property’s discounted future cash flows using market derived cap rates applied against our expected hold period. Any material changes to the estimates and assumptions used in this analysis could have a significant impact on our results of operations, as the changes would impact our determination of whether impairment is deemed to have occurred and the amount of impairment loss that we would recognize.

Using the methodology discussed above, we evaluated our entire portfolio as of December 31, 2019, for any impairment indicators and performed an impairment analysis on those select properties that had an indication of impairment. We incurred $1.8 million of impairment expense during the year ended December 31, 2019 when we impaired a property we classified as held for sale to be equal to fair market value.

We will continue to monitor our portfolio for any other indicators of impairment.

Results of Operations

The weighted average yield on our total portfolio, which was 8.5% and 8.7% at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, is calculated by taking the annualized straight-line rents, reflected as lease revenue on our consolidated statements of operations, of each acquisition as a percentage of the acquisition cost. The weighted average yield does not account for the interest expense incurred on the mortgages placed on our properties or other types of existing indebtedness.

A comparison of our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 is below (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
 

45

 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
$ Change
 
% Change
Operating revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lease revenue
 
$
114,387

 
$
106,798

 
$
7,589

 
7.1
 %
Total operating revenues
 
114,387

 
106,798

 
7,589

 
7.1
 %
Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
52,039

 
47,620

 
4,419

 
9.3
 %
Property operating expenses
 
12,592

 
11,458

 
1,134

 
9.9
 %
Base management fee
 
5,174

 
5,054

 
120

 
2.4
 %
Incentive fee
 
3,688

 
3,042

 
646

 
21.2
 %
Administration fee
 
1,690

 
1,605

 
85

 
5.3
 %
General and administrative
 
3,235

 
2,358

 
877

 
37.2
 %
Impairment charge
 
1,813

 
—

 
1,813

 
100.0
 %
Total operating expenses
 
80,231

 
71,137

 
9,094

 
12.8
 %
Other (expense) income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
(28,279
)
 
(26,172
)
 
(2,107
)
 
8.1
 %
Gain on sale of real estate, net
 
2,952

 
2,763

 
189

 
6.8
 %
Other income
 
712

 
72

 
640

 
888.9
 %
Total other expense, net
 
(24,615
)
 
(23,337
)
 
(1,278
)
 
5.5
 %
Net income
 
9,541

 
12,324

 
(2,783
)
 
(22.6
)%
Distributions attributable to Series A, B, D, and E preferred stock
 
(10,822
)
 
(10,416
)
 
(406
)
 
3.9
 %
Series A and B preferred stock offering costs write off
 
(2,674
)
 
—

 
(2,674
)
 
100.0
 %
Distributions attributable to senior common stock
 
(892
)
 
(931
)
 
39

 
(4.2
)%
Net (loss) income (attributable) available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders
 
$
(4,847
)
 
$
977

 
$
(5,824
)
 
(596.1
)%
Net (loss) income (attributable) available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders per weighted average share of total stock - basic & diluted
 
$
(0.16
)
 
$
0.03

 
$
(0.19
)
 
(633.3
)%
FFO available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders - basic
 
$
46,053

 
$
45,834

 
$
219

 
0.5
 %
FFO available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders - diluted
 
$
46,945

 
$
46,765

 
$
180

 
0.4
 %
FFO available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders - diluted, as adjusted for comparability
 
$
49,619

 
$
46,765

 
$
2,854

 
6.1
 %
(Loss) gain per weighted average share of common stock and Non-controlling OP Unit - basic & diluted
 
$
(0.16
)
 
$
0.03

 
$
(0.19
)
 
(633.3
)%
FFO per weighted average share of common stock and Non-controlling OP Unit - basic
 
$
1.47

 
$
1.59

 
$
(0.12
)
 
(7.5
)%
FFO per weighted average share of common stock and Non-controlling OP Unit - diluted
 
$
1.46

 
$
1.58


$
(0.12
)
 
(7.6
)%
FFO per weighted average share of common stock and Non-controlling OP Unit - diluted, as adjusted for comparability
 
$
1.55

 
$
1.58

 
$
(0.03
)
 
(1.9
)%

Same Store Analysis

For the purposes of the following discussion, same store properties are properties we owned as of January 1, 2018, which have not been subsequently vacated or disposed. Acquired and disposed properties are properties which were either acquired, disposed of or classified as held for sale at any point subsequent to December 31, 2017. Properties with vacancy are properties that were fully vacant or had greater than 5% vacancy, based on square footage, at any point subsequent to January 1, 2018.


46

Operating Revenues
 
 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
Lease Revenues
 
2019
 
2018
 
$ Change
 
% Change
Same Store Properties
 
$
97,509

 
$
97,081

 
$
428

 
0.4
%
Acquired & Disposed Properties
 
10,424

 
3,985

 
6,439

 
161.6
%
Properties with Vacancy
 
6,454

 
5,732

 
722

 
12.6
%
 
 
$
114,387

 
$
106,798

 
$
7,589

 
7.1
%

Lease revenues consist of rental income and operating expense recoveries earned from our tenants. Lease revenues from same store properties increased for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to increased operating expense recoveries from leases with base year expense stops at certain of our properties that were running above their base year, coupled with increased operating expense recoveries from amortizing capital improvements paid for by our tenants at certain properties. Lease revenues increased for acquired and disposed of properties for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, because we acquired 18 properties during the year ended December 31, 2019, and we included a full year of lease revenues recorded in 2019 for five properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2018, offset by a decrease in lease revenues from the one property we sold during 2019. Lease revenues increased for properties with vacancy, as we were able to successfully lease previously vacant space in these properties and collect lease termination fees at certain of these properties.
 
Operating Expenses

Depreciation and amortization increased for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to recognizing a full year of depreciation for the five properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2018, as well as increased depreciation expense from the 18 properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2019, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation expense for the one property sold during the year ended December 31, 2019.
 
 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
Property Operating Expenses
 
2019
 
2018
 
$ Change
 
% Change
Same Store Properties
 
$
10,119

 
$
9,479

 
$
640

 
6.8
 %
Acquired & Disposed Properties
 
1,264

 
767

 
497

 
64.8
 %
Properties with Vacancy
 
1,209

 
1,212

 
(3
)
 
(0.2
)%
 
 
$
12,592

 
$
11,458

 
$
1,134

 
9.9
 %

Property operating expenses consist of franchise taxes, management fees, insurance, ground lease payments, property maintenance and repair expenses paid on behalf of certain of our properties. The increase in property operating expenses for same store properties for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, is primarily a result of an increase in our property operating expenses at our base year expense stop leased properties. The increase in property operating expenses on acquired and disposed of properties for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, is a result of property operating expenses on the 18 properties we acquired during the year ended December 31, 2019, coupled with a full year of property operating expenses for the five properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2018, partially offset by a decrease in property operating expenses for the one property sold during the year ended December 31, 2019.

The base management fee paid to the Adviser increased for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, due to an increase in total equity, the main component of the base management fee calculation. The calculation of the base management fee is described in detail above within “Advisory and Administration Agreements.”

The incentive fee paid to the Adviser increased for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, because of an increase in pre-incentive fee FFO. The increase in pre-incentive fee FFO was primarily due to an increase in lease revenues from the 18 properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2019, coupled with a full year of lease revenues from the five properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2018, partially offset by an increase in property operating expenses resulting from our lease portfolio containing additional base year leases. The calculation of the incentive fee is described in detail above within “Advisory and Administration Agreements.”


47

The administration fee paid to the Administrator increased for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase is a result of the Company using a greater share of the Administrator’s resources for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, coupled with an overall increase in the cost of such services. The calculation of the administration fee is described in detail above within “Advisory and Administration Agreements.”

General and administrative expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily as a result of an increase in legal, accounting and due diligence expenses.

The impairment charge during the year ended December 31, 2019 resulted from an impairment recorded on our Charlotte, North Carolina property as we determined a portion of the carrying value of this property was unrecoverable through our held for sale analysis of this property where we impaired this property to fair market value. We did not recognize an impairment charge during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Other Income and Expenses

Interest expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. This increase is primarily a result of an increase in borrowings on our Credit Facility coupled with increased mortgage borrowings.

The gain on sale of real estate, net, during the year ended December 31, 2019 is a result of a gain on sale from one property. The gain on sale of real estate, net, during the year ended December 31, 2018 was a result of the sale of three of our properties.

Other income increased during the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, from settlement income earned from certain tenants vacating our properties.

Net (Loss) Income (Attributable) Available to Common Stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders

Net (loss) income (attributable) available to common stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders increased for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily because of an increase in operating expenses due to increases in depreciation and amortization expense and an impairment charge on one property coupled with an increase in interest expense due to higher average Credit Facility balances and a write off of our Series A and Series B Preferred Stock offering costs, due to our voluntary redemption of these shares. This is partially offset by an increase in lease revenues due to our acquisition of 18 properties during the year ended December 31, 2019.

A discussion of the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017 is found in Item 7 of Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 13, 2019, which is available free of charge on the SECs website at www.sec.gov and on the investor relations section of our website at www.GladstoneCommercial.com

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Our sources of liquidity include cash flows from operations, cash and cash equivalents, borrowing capacity under our Revolver and issuing additional equity securities. Our available liquidity as of December 31, 2019, was $27.3 million, including $6.8 million in cash and cash equivalents and an available borrowing capacity of $20.5 million under our Revolver. Our available borrowing capacity under the Revolver has increased to $34.6 million as of February 12, 2020.

Future Capital Needs

We actively seek conservative investments that are likely to produce income to allow us to pay distributions to our stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders. We intend to use the proceeds received from future equity raised and debt capital borrowed to continue to invest in industrial and office real property, make mortgage loans, or pay down outstanding borrowings under our Revolver. Accordingly, to ensure that we are able to effectively execute our business strategy, we routinely review our liquidity requirements and continually evaluate all potential sources of liquidity. Our short-term liquidity needs include proceeds necessary to fund our distributions to stockholders, pay the debt service costs on our existing long-term mortgages, refinancing maturing debt and fund our current operating costs. Our long-term liquidity needs include proceeds necessary to grow and maintain our portfolio of investments.


48

We believe that our available liquidity is sufficient to fund our distributions to stockholders, pay the debt service costs on our existing long-term mortgages and fund our current operating costs in the near term. We also believe we will be able to refinance our mortgage debt as it matures. Additionally, to satisfy our short-term obligations, we may request credits to our management fees that are issued from our Adviser, although our Adviser is under no obligation to provide any such credits, either in whole or in part. We further believe that our cash flow from operations, coupled with the financing capital available to us in the future, are sufficient to fund our long-term liquidity needs.

Equity Capital

The following table summarizes net proceeds raised from our various equity sales during the year ended December 31, 2019 (dollars in thousands, except for share price):

 
 
Net Proceeds
 
Number of Shares Sold
 
Weighted Average Share Price
Common Stock ATM Program
 
$
64,541

 
3,025,727

 
$
21.66

Series E Preferred Stock Public Offering
 
66,555

 
2,760,000

 
25.00

 
 
$
131,096

 
5,785,727

 
 

As of February 12, 2020, we had the ability to raise up to $409.7 million of additional equity capital through the sale and issuance of securities that are registered under our Universal Shelf, in one or more future public offerings. Of the $409.7 million capacity under our Universal Shelf, approximately $209.2 million is reserved for additional sales under our Common ATM Program, and approximately $100.0 million is reserved for additional sales under our Series E Preferred ATM Program as of February 12, 2020. We have the ability to raise an additional $800.0 million of equity capital under the 2020 Universal Shelf filed on January 29, 2020. We expect to continue to use our ATM Programs as a source of liquidity during 2020.

Debt Capital

As of December 31, 2019, we had 54 mortgage notes payable in the aggregate principal amount of $457.9 million, collateralized by a total of 70 properties with a remaining weighted average maturity of 5.7 years. The weighted-average interest rate on the mortgage notes payable as of December 31, 2019 was 4.5%.

We continue to see banks and other non-bank lenders willing to issue mortgages. Consequently, we are focused on obtaining mortgages through regional banks, non-bank lenders and the CMBS market.

As of December 31, 2019, we had mortgage debt in the aggregate principal amount of $31.3 million payable during 2020 and $38.6 million payable during 2021. The 2020 principal amounts payable include both amortizing principal payments and four balloon principal payments. We anticipate being able to refinance our mortgages that come due during 2020 and 2021 with a combination of new mortgage debt, availability under our Credit Facility and the issuance of additional equity securities. We have successfully repaid $45.0 million of debt over the past 12 months with either new mortgage debt or by generating additional availability by adding properties to our unsecured pool under our Credit Facility, as well as additional funds generated from our July 2019 Credit Facility amendment, which resulted in us expanding our Term Loan from $75.0 million to $160.0 million, inclusive of a delayed draw component whereby we can incrementally borrow on the Term Loan up to the $160.0 million commitment and increasing our Revolver from $85.0 million to $100.0 million.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2019, was $60.2 million, as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $55.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. This increase was primarily a result of an increase in operating revenues received from the properties acquired during the past 12 months, partially offset by an increase in interest expense due to higher borrowings on our Credit Facility, higher mortgage borrowings, and increased property operating expenses resulting from base year leases added to our lease portfolio. The majority of cash from operating activities is generated from the rental payments and operating expense recoveries that we receive from our tenants. The increase in operating expense recoveries is a result of buying properties with base year expense stops, whereby the operating expenses are offset by a like amount of expense recovery income that is included in the first year gross rental income. We utilize this cash to fund our property-level operating expenses and use the excess cash primarily for debt and interest payments on our mortgage notes payable, interest payments on our Credit Facility, distributions to our stockholders, management fees to our Adviser, administration fees to our Administrator and other entity-level operating expenses.

49


Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2019, was $132.0 million, which primarily consisted of the acquisition of 18 properties and tenant improvements performed at certain of our properties, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of real estate. Net cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2018, was $34.4 million, which primarily consisted of the acquisition of five properties, partially offset by proceeds from sale of real estate.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2019, was $74.2 million, which primarily consisted of proceeds from our common stock and Series E Preferred Stock offerings, mortgage borrowings on new acquisitions and borrowings on our Credit Facility, partially offset by distributions paid to our stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders. Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018, was $21.2 million, which primarily consisted of repayments of outstanding mortgage principal coupled with distributions paid to our stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unitholders, partially offset by borrowings on our Credit Facility.

Credit Facility

On July 2, 2019, we amended, extended and upsized our Credit Facility, expanding the Term Loan from $75.0 million to $160.0 million, inclusive of a delayed draw component whereby we can incrementally borrow on the Term Loan up to the $160.0 million commitment, and increasing the Revolver from $85.0 million to $100.0 million. The Term Loan has a new five-year term, with a maturity date of July 2, 2024, and the Revolver has a new four-year term, with a maturity date of July 2, 2023. The interest rate margin for the Credit Facility was reduced by 10 basis points at each of the leverage tiers. We entered into multiple interest rate cap agreements on the amended Term Loan, which cap LIBOR ranging from 2.50% to 2.75%, to hedge our exposure to variable interest rates. We used the net proceeds derived from the amended Credit Facility to repay all previously existing borrowings under the Revolver. We incurred fees of approximately $1.3 million in connection with the Credit Facility amendment. The bank syndicate for the Credit Facility is now comprised of KeyBank, Fifth Third Bank, U.S. Bank National Association, The Huntington National Bank, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.

As of December 31, 2019, there was $174.7 million outstanding under our Credit Facility at a weighted average interest rate of approximately 3.38% and $12.0 million outstanding under letters of credit at a weighted average interest rate of 1.65%. As of February 12, 2020, the maximum additional amount we could draw under the Credit Facility was $34.6 million. We were in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2019.

Contractual Obligations

The following table reflects our material contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
 
 
 
Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations
 
Total
 
Less than 1 Year
 
1-3 Years
 
3-5 Years
 
More than 5 Years
Debt Obligations (1)
 
$
632,622

 
$
31,259

 
$
145,487

 
$
294,256

 
$
161,620

Interest on Debt Obligations (2)
 
113,512

 
25,508

 
46,428

 
26,653

 
14,923

Operating Lease Obligations (3)
 
10,216

 
466

 
966

 
985

 
7,799

Purchase Obligations (4)
 
1,397

 
1,397

 
—

 
—

 
—


 
$
757,747

 
$
58,630

 
$
192,881

 
$
321,894

 
$
184,342

 
(1)
Debt obligations represent borrowings under our Revolver, which represents $52.4 million of the debt obligation due in 2023, our Term Loan, which represents $122.3 million of the debt obligation due in 2024, and mortgage notes payable that were outstanding as of December 31, 2019. This figure does not include $(0.2) million of premiums and (discounts), net, and $5.8 million of deferred financing costs, net, which are reflected in mortgage notes payable, net, borrowings under Revolver, and borrowings under Term Loan, net, on the consolidated balance sheet.
(2)
Interest on debt obligations includes estimated interest on our borrowings under our Revolver and Term Loan and mortgage notes payable. The balance and interest rate on our Revolver and Term Loan is variable; thus, the interest payment obligation calculated for purposes of this table was based upon rates and balances as of December 31, 2019.
(3)
Operating lease obligations represent the ground lease payments due on four of our properties.
(4)
Purchase obligations consist of tenant and capital improvements at four of our properties.

50


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We did not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2019.


51

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. The primary risk that we believe we are and will be exposed to is interest rate risk. Certain of our leases contain escalations based on market indices, and the interest rate on our Credit Facility is variable. Although we seek to mitigate this risk by structuring such provisions of our loans and leases to contain a minimum interest rate or escalation rate, as applicable, these features do not eliminate this risk. To that end, we have entered into derivative contracts to cap interest rates for our variable rate notes payable, and we have entered into interest rate swaps whereby we pay a fixed interest rate to our respective counterparty, and receive one month LIBOR in return. For details regarding our rate cap agreements and our interest rate swap agreements see Note 6 – Mortgage Notes Payable and Credit Facility of the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

To illustrate the potential impact of changes in interest rates on our net income for the year ended December 31, 2019, we have performed the following analysis, which assumes that our balance sheet remains constant and that no further actions beyond a minimum interest rate or escalation rate are taken to alter our existing interest rate sensitivity.

The following table summarizes the annual impact of a 1%, 2% and 3% increase, and a 1% decrease in the one month LIBOR as of December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, our effective average LIBOR was 1.76%. Given that a 2% or 3% decrease in LIBOR would result in a negative rate, the impact of this fluctuation is not presented below.

 
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest Rate Change
 
(Decrease) increase to Interest Expense
 
Net Increase (decrease) to Net Income
1% Decrease to LIBOR
 
(2,230
)
 
2,230

1% Increase to LIBOR
 
2,058

 
(2,058
)
2% Increase to LIBOR
 
2,665

 
(2,665
)
3% Increase to LIBOR
 
3,204

 
(3,204
)

As of December 31, 2019, the fair value of our mortgage debt outstanding was $466.1 million. Interest rate fluctuations may affect the fair value of our debt instruments. If interest rates on our debt instruments, using rates at December 31, 2019, had been one percentage point higher or lower, the fair value of those debt instruments on that date would have decreased or increased by $17.3 million and $18.4 million, respectively.

The amount outstanding under the Credit Facility approximates fair value as of December 31, 2019.

In the future, we may be exposed to additional effects of interest rate changes, primarily as a result of our Revolver, Term Loan or long-term mortgage debt, which we use to maintain liquidity and fund expansion of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we will borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable rates with the lowest margins available and, in some cases, with the ability to convert variable rates to fixed rates. We may also enter into derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swaps and caps, to mitigate the interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. We will not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.

In addition to changes in interest rates, the value of our real estate is subject to fluctuations based on changes in local and regional economic conditions and changes in the creditworthiness of lessees and borrowers, all of which may affect our ability to refinance debt, if necessary.

As of December 31, 2019, approximately $412.8 million of our debt bore interest at fixed rates, as shown in the future principal debt payment table below (dollars in thousands):

 
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Total
Fixed rate
$
10,931

$
30,232

$
98,762

$
62,908

$
48,318

$
161,620

$
412,771

Variable rate
$
20,328

$
8,322

$
8,171

$
60,730

$
122,300

$
—

$
219,851

 
$
31,259

$
38,554

$
106,933

$
123,638

$
170,618

$
161,620

$
632,622


52


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
 

53


Report of Management on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Gladstone Commercial Corporation:

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and include those policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and the dispositions of our assets, provide reasonable assurance that our transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with appropriate authorizations; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO). Based on our assessment, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

February 12, 2020

54


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Gladstone Commercial Corporation

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Gladstone Commercial Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, including the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


55

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
McLean, Virginia
February 12, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2003.  


56

Gladstone Commercial Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)
 
 
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Real estate, at cost
 
$
1,056,978

 
$
946,649

Less: accumulated depreciation
 
207,523

 
178,257

Total real estate, net
 
849,455

 
768,392

Lease intangibles, net
 
115,465

 
111,448

Real estate and related assets held for sale, net
 
3,990

 
4,151

Cash and cash equivalents
 
6,849

 
6,591

Restricted cash
 
4,639

 
2,491

Funds held in escrow
 
7,226

 
6,010

Right-of-use assets from operating leases
 
5,794

 
—

Deferred rent receivable, net
 
37,177

 
34,771

Other assets
 
8,913

 
4,921

TOTAL ASSETS
 
$
1,039,508

 
$
938,775

LIABILITIES, MEZZANINE EQUITY AND EQUITY
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
Mortgage notes payable, net (1)
 
$
453,739

 
$
441,346

Borrowings under Revolver, net
 
51,579

 
50,084

Borrowings under Term Loan, net
 
121,276

 
74,629

Deferred rent liability, net
 
19,322

 
17,305

Operating lease liabilities
 
5,847

 
—

Asset retirement obligation
 
3,137

 
2,875

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
 
5,573

 
2,704

Liabilities related to assets held for sale, net
 
21

 
—

Due to Adviser and Administrator (1)
 
2,904

 
2,523

Other liabilities
 
12,920

 
7,292

TOTAL LIABILITIES
 
$
676,318

 
$
598,758

Commitments and contingencies (2)
 

 

MEZZANINE EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Series D and E redeemable preferred stock, net, par value $0.001 per share; $25 per share liquidation preference; 12,760,000 and 6,000,000 shares authorized; and 6,269,555 and 3,509,555 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively (3)
 
$
152,153

 
$
85,598

TOTAL MEZZANINE EQUITY
 
$
152,153

 
$
85,598

EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Series A and B redeemable preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share; $25 per share liquidation preference; 0 and 5,350,000 shares authorized and 0 and 2,264,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively (3)
 
$
—

 
$
2

Senior common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 950,000 shares authorized; and 806,435 and 866,259 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively (3)
 
1

 
1

Common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 86,290,000 and 87,700,000 shares authorized and 32,593,651 and 29,254,899 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively (3)
 
32

 
29

Additional paid in capital
 
571,205

 
559,977

Accumulated other comprehensive income
 
(2,126
)
 
(148
)
Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings
 
(360,978
)
 
(310,117
)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
$
208,134

 
$
249,744

OP Units held by Non-controlling OP Unitholders (3)
 
2,903

 
4,675

TOTAL EQUITY
 
$
211,037

 
$
254,419

TOTAL LIABILITIES, MEZZANINE EQUITY AND EQUITY
 
$
1,039,508

 
$
938,775

 
(1)
Refer to Note 2 “Related-Party Transactions”
(2)
Refer to Note 9 “Commitments and Contingencies”
(3)
Refer to Note 10 “Equity and Mezzanine Equity”

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

57


Gladstone Commercial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)
 
 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
Operating revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lease revenue
 
$
114,387

 
$
106,798

 
$
94,799

Total operating revenues
 
$
114,387

 
$
106,798

 
$
94,799

Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
$
52,039

 
$
47,620

 
$
42,795

Property operating expenses
 
12,592

 
11,458

 
7,688

Base management fee (1)
 
5,174

 
5,054

 
4,959

Incentive fee (1)
 
3,688

 
3,042

 
2,422

Administration fee (1)
 
1,690

 
1,605

 
1,272

General and administrative
 
3,235

 
2,358

 
2,366

Impairment charge
 
1,813

 
—

 
6,835

Total operating expenses
 
$
80,231

 
$
71,137

 
$
68,337

Other (expense) income
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
 
$
(28,279
)
 
$
(26,172
)
 
$
(24,570
)
Gain on sale of real estate, net
 
2,952

 
2,763

 
3,993

Other income
 
712

 
72

 
52

Total other expense, net
 
$
(24,615
)
 
$
(23,337
)
 
$
(20,525
)
Net income
 
$
9,541

 
$
12,324

 
$
5,937

Net loss (income) attributable to OP Units held by Non-controlling OP Unitholders
 
87

 
(4
)
 
—

Net income attributable to the Company
 
$
9,628

 
$
12,320

 
$
5,937

Distributions attributable to Series A, B, D, and E preferred stock
 
(10,822
)
 
(10,416
)
 
(9,890
)
Series A and B Preferred Stock offering costs write off
 
(2,674
)
 
—

 
—

Distributions attributable to senior common stock
 
(892
)
 
(931
)
 
(986
)
Net (loss) income (attributable) available to common stockholders
 
$
(4,760
)
 
$
973

 
$
(4,939
)
(Loss) earnings per weighted average share of common stock - basic & diluted
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Loss) earnings (attributable) available to common shareholders
 
$
(0.16
)
 
$
0.03

 
$
(0.19
)
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic and Diluted
 
30,695,902

 
28,675,934

 
26,358,237

Distributions declared per common share
 
$
1.50

 
$
1.50

 
$
1.50

Earnings per weighted average share of senior common stock
 
$
1.05

 
$
1.05

 
$
1.05

Weighted average shares of senior common stock outstanding - basic
 
849,348

 
887,081

 
938,779

Comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in unrealized (loss) gain related to interest rate hedging instruments, net
 
$
(1,978
)
 
$
(183
)
 
$
35

Other Comprehensive (loss) income
 
(1,978
)
 
(183
)
 
35

Net income
 
$
9,541

 
$
12,324

 
$
5,937

Comprehensive income
 
$
7,563

 
$
12,141

 
$
5,972

Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to OP Units held by Non-controlling OP Unitholders
 
87

 
(4
)
 
—

Total comprehensive income attributable to the Company
 
$
7,650

 
$
12,137

 
$
5,972

 
(1)
Refer to Note 2 “Related-Party Transactions”

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

58

Gladstone Commercial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 
 
Series A and B Preferred Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Senior Common Stock
 
Series A and B Preferred Stock
 
Senior Common Stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional Paid in Capital
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
 
Distributions in Excess of Accumulated Earnings
 
Total Stockholders' Equity
 
Non-Controlling Interest
 
Total Equity
Balance at December 31, 2016
 
2,264,000

 
24,882,758

 
959,552

 
$
2

 
$
1

 
$
25

 
$
463,436

 
$
—

 
$
(223,587
)
 
$
239,877

 
$
—

 
$
239,877

Issuance of Series A and B preferred stock and common stock, net
 
—

 
3,455,023

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
3

 
71,378

 
—

 
—

 
71,381

 
—

 
71,381

Conversion of senior common stock to common stock
 
—

 
46,235

 
(53,135
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Retirement of senior common stock, net
 
—

 
—

 
(1,598
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(24
)
 
—

 
—

 
(24
)
 
—

 
(24
)
Distributions declared to common, senior common and preferred stockholders
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(50,408
)
 
(50,408
)
 
—

 
(50,408
)
Comprehensive income
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
35

 
—

 
35

 
—

 
35

Net income
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
5,937

 
5,937

 
—

 
5,937

Balance at December 31, 2017
 
2,264,000

 
28,384,016

 
904,819

 
$
2

 
$
1

 
$
28

 
$
534,790

 
$
35

 
$
(268,058
)
 
$
266,798

 
$
—

 
$
266,798

Issuance of Series A and B preferred stock and common stock, net
 
—

 
841,338

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1

 
16,103

 
—

 
—

 
16,104

 
—

 
16,104

Conversion of senior common stock to common stock
 
—

 
29,545

 
(36,294
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Retirement of senior common stock, net
 
—

 
—

 
(2,266
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(34
)
 
—

 
—

 
(34
)
 
—

 
(34
)
Distributions declared to common, senior common and preferred stockholders
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(54,379
)
 
(54,379
)
 
(186
)
 
(54,565
)
Comprehensive income
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(183
)
 
—

 
(183
)
 
—

 
(183
)
Issuance of Non-controlling OP Units as consideration in real estate acquisitions, net
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
13,975

 
13,975

Adjustment to OP Units held by Non-controlling OP Unitholders resulting from changes in ownership of the Operating Partnership
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
9,118

 
—

 
—

 
9,118

 
(9,118
)
 
—

Net income
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
12,320

 
12,320

 
4

 
12,324

Balance at December 31, 2018
 
2,264,000

 
29,254,899

 
866,259

 
$
2

 
$
1

 
$
29

 
$
559,977

 
$
(148
)
 
$
(310,117
)
 
$
249,744

 
$
4,675

 
$
254,419

Issuance of Series A and B preferred stock and common stock, net
 
—

 
3,025,727

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
3

 
64,539

 
—

 
—

 
64,542

 
—

 
64,542

Conversion of senior common stock to common stock
 
—

 
49,725

 
(59,824
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Redemption of Series A and B preferred stock, net
 
(2,264,000
)
 
—

 
—

 
(2
)
 
—

 
—

 
(53,924
)
 
—

 
(2,674
)
 
(56,600
)
 
—

 
(56,600
)
Distributions declared to common, senior common, preferred stockholders and Non-controlling OP Unit holders
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(23
)
 
—

 
(57,815
)
 
(57,838
)
 
(1,049
)
 
(58,887
)
Comprehensive income
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(1,978
)
 
—

 
(1,978
)
 
—

 
(1,978
)
Redemptions of OP Units
 
—

 
263,300

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
6,143

 
—

 
—

 
6,143

 
(6,143
)
 
—

Adjustment to OP Units held by Non-controlling OP Unitholders resulting from changes in ownership of the Operating Partnership
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(5,507
)
 
—

 
—

 
(5,507
)
 
5,507

 
—

Net income
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
9,628

 
9,628

 
(87
)
 
9,541

Balance at December 31, 2019
 
—

 
32,593,651

 
806,435

 
$
—

 
$
1

 
$
32

 
$
571,205

 
$
(2,126
)
 
$
(360,978
)
 
$
208,134

 
$
2,903

 
$
211,037

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

59

Gladstone Commercial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
9,541

 
$
12,324

 
$
5,937

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
52,039

 
47,620

 
42,795

Impairment charge
 
1,813

 
—

 
6,835

Gain on sale of real estate, net
 
(2,952
)
 
(2,763
)
 
(3,993
)
Amortization of deferred financing costs
 
1,641

 
1,445

 
1,713

Amortization of deferred rent asset and liability, net
 
(1,446
)
 
(728
)
 
(851
)
Amortization of discount and premium on assumed debt, net
 
62

 
(20
)
 
(99
)
Asset retirement obligation expense
 
119

 
121

 
125

Bad debt expense
 
152

 
—

 
—

Operating changes in assets and liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Increase) decrease in other assets
 
(2,170
)
 
(445
)
 
(1,866
)
Increase in deferred rent receivable
 
(1,477
)
 
(2,548
)
 
(3,077
)
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and amount due to Adviser and Administrator
 
1,921

 
749

 
(524
)
Decrease in right-of-use asset from operating leases
 
204

 
—

 
—

Decrease in operating lease liabilities
 
(151
)
 
—

 
—

Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
 
2,075

 
246

 
521

Tenant inducement payments
 
—

 
—

 
(122
)
Leasing commissions paid
 
(1,177
)
 
(402
)
 
(552
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
 
$
60,194

 
$
55,599

 
$
46,842

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisition of real estate and related intangible assets
 
$
(130,313
)
 
$
(42,353
)
 
$
(120,978
)
Improvements of existing real estate
 
(7,570
)
 
(4,328
)
 
(9,216
)
Proceeds from sale of real estate
 
6,318

 
12,835

 
29,499

Receipts from lenders for funds held in escrow
 
2,664

 
1,769

 
7,302

Payments to lenders for funds held in escrow
 
(3,880
)
 
(2,376
)
 
(5,899
)
Receipts from tenants for reserves
 
4,782

 
2,682

 
2,093

Payments to tenants from reserves
 
(2,496
)
 
(2,669
)
 
(2,666
)
Deposits on future acquisitions
 
(5,952
)
 
(1,590
)
 
(3,150
)
Deposits applied against acquisition of real estate investments
 
4,410

 
1,590

 
3,150

Net cash used in investing activities
 
$
(132,037
)
 
$
(34,440
)
 
$
(99,865
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from issuance of equity
 
$
134,527

 
$
18,565

 
$
86,260

Offering costs paid
 
(3,431
)
 
(295
)
 
(2,190
)
Retirement of senior common stock
 
—

 
(34
)
 
(24
)
Redemption of Series A and B perpetual preferred stock
 
(56,600
)
 
—

 
—

Borrowings under mortgage notes payable
 
69,650

 
14,125

 
51,208

Payments for deferred financing costs
 
(2,480
)
 
(386
)
 
(1,990
)
Principal repayments on mortgage notes payable
 
(57,438
)
 
(27,850
)
 
(60,080
)
Proceeds from issuance of term loan facility
 
47,300

 
—

 
50,000

Borrowings from revolving credit facility
 
165,400

 
88,600

 
116,900

Repayments on revolving credit facility
 
(163,600
)
 
(59,400
)
 
(135,200
)
(Decrease) increase in security deposits
 
(192
)
 
83

 
(61
)
Distributions paid for common, senior common, preferred stock and Non-controlling OP Unitholders
 
(58,887
)
 
(54,565
)
 
(50,408
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
 
$
74,249

 
$
(21,157
)
 
$
54,415

Net increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
 
$
2,406

 
$
2

 
$
1,392

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period
 
$
9,082

 
$
9,080

 
$
7,688


60

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period
 
$
11,488

 
$
9,082

 
$
9,080

SUPPLEMENTAL NON-CASH INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash paid during year for interest
 
$
25,685

 
$
24,987

 
$
22,352

Tenant funded fixed asset improvements
 
$
2,787

 
$
1,608

 
$
3,018

Assumed mortgage in connection with acquisition
 
$
—

 
$
6,918

 
$
11,179

Assumed interest rate swap fair market value
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
42

Reserves released by title company to tenant
 
$
—

 
$
3,966

 
$
—

Capital improvements and leasing commissions included in accounts payable and accrued expenses
 
$
390

 
$
311

 
$
1,495

Assumed tenant improvement allowance in connection with acquisition
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
3,966

Unrealized (loss) gain related to interest rate hedging instruments, net
 
$
(1,978
)
 
$
(183
)
 
$
35

Non-controlling OP Units issued in connection with acquisition
 
$
—

 
$
13,975

 
$
—

Increase in asset retirement obligation assumed in acquisition
 
$
164

 
$
—

 
$
—

Series A and B Preferred Stock offering cost write off
 
$
2,674

 
$
—

 
$
—

Right-of-use asset from operating leases
 
$
5,998

 
$
—

 
$
—

Operating lease liabilities
 
$
(5,998
)
 
$
—

 
$
—

Property manager other assets
 
$
1,676

 
$
—

 
$
—

Property manager accrued expenses and other liabilities
 
$
(1,676
)
 
$
—

 
$
—


The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the consolidated balance sheets that sum to the total of the same amounts shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows (dollars in thousands):

 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
6,849

 
$
6,591

 
$
6,683

Restricted cash
 
4,639

 
2,491

 
2,397

Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows
 
$
11,488

 
$
9,082

 
$
9,080


Restricted cash consists of security deposits and receipts from tenants for reserves. These funds will be released to the tenants upon completion of agreed upon tasks, as specified in the lease agreements, mainly consisting of maintenance and repairs on the buildings and upon receipt by us of evidence of insurance and tax payments.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

61

Gladstone Commercial Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Organization, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

Gladstone Commercial Corporation was incorporated under the General Corporation Law of the State of Maryland on February 14, 2003. We have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. We focus on acquiring, owning and managing primarily office and industrial properties. On a selective basis, we may make long term industrial and office mortgage loans receivable; however, we do not have any mortgage loans currently outstanding. Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, our business is managed by Gladstone Management Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Adviser”), and administrative services are provided by Gladstone Administration, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Administrator”), each pursuant to a contractual arrangement with us. Our Adviser and Administrator collectively employ all of our personnel and pay their salaries, benefits, and general expenses directly. Gladstone Commercial Corporation conducts substantially all of its operations through a subsidiary, Gladstone Commercial Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”).

All further references herein to “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” mean Gladstone Commercial Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where it is made clear that the term means only Gladstone Commercial Corporation. All references to annualized GAAP (as defined below) rent are rents that each tenant pays in accordance with the terms of its respective lease reported evenly over the non-cancelable term of the lease.

Subsidiaries

We conduct substantially all of our operations through the Operating Partnership. We currently control the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and own, directly or indirectly, a majority of the limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (“Non-controlling OP Units”) through two of our subsidiaries, GCLP Business Trust I and II. The financial position and results of operations of the Operating Partnership are consolidated within our financial statements. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company owned 98.6% and 97.5%, respectively, of the outstanding OP Units (See Note 10, “Equity and Mezzanine Equity” for additional discussion regarding OP Units).

Gladstone Commercial Lending, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Gladstone Commercial Lending”), a subsidiary of ours, was created to conduct all operations related to our real estate mortgage loans. As the Operating Partnership currently owns all of the membership interests of Gladstone Commercial Lending, the financial position and results of operations of Gladstone Commercial Lending are consolidated with ours.

Gladstone Commercial Advisers, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Commercial Advisers”), and wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) of ours, was created to collect any non-qualifying income related to our real estate portfolio. There has been no such income earned to date. Since we own 100% of the voting securities of Commercial Advisers, the financial position and results of operations of Commercial Advisers are consolidated within our financial statements.

GCLP Business Trust I and GCLP Business Trust II, each a subsidiary and business trust of ours, were formed under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on December 28, 2005. We transferred our 99% limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership to GCLP Business Trust I in exchange for 100 shares of the trust. Gladstone Commercial Partners, LLC, a subsidiary of ours, transferred its 1% general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership to GCLP Business Trust II in exchange for 100 trust shares.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.


62

Real Estate and Lease Intangibles

We record investments in real estate at cost and capitalize improvements and replacements when they extend the useful life or improve the efficiency of the asset. We expense costs of repairs and maintenance as such costs are incurred. We compute depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life, or up to 39 years, for buildings and improvements, five to 20 years for equipment and fixtures, and the shorter of the useful life or the remaining lease term for tenant improvements and leasehold interests.

Most properties that we acquire are already being operated as rental properties, which we consider to be asset acquisitions under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360, “Property Plant and Equipment” (“ASC 360”) after adopting Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-01 “Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU 2017-01”), described in more detail below. When an acquisition is considered an asset acquisition, ASC 360 requires that the purchase price of real estate be allocated to the acquired tangible assets and liabilities, consisting of land, building, tenant improvements, long-term debt assumed and identified intangible assets and liabilities, typically the value of above-market and below-market leases, the value of in-place leases, the value of lease origination costs and the value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their fair values. ASC 360 allows us to capitalize all expenses related to an acquisition accounted for as an asset acquisition into the cost of the acquisition.

Management’s estimates of fair value are made using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers (e.g. discounted cash flow analysis). Factors considered by management in its analysis include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. We also consider information obtained about each property as a result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In estimating carrying costs, management also includes lost reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses as well as estimates of lost rents at market rates during the hypothetical expected lease-up periods, which generally range from nine to 18 months, depending on specific local market conditions. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses to the extent that such costs are not already incurred in connection with a new lease origination as part of the transaction.

We allocate purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property by valuing the property as if it were vacant. The “as-if-vacant” value is allocated to land, building and tenant improvements based on management’s determination of the relative fair values of these assets on the date of acquisition.

Above-market and below-market in-place lease fair values for acquired properties are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. When determining the non-cancelable term of the lease, we evaluate which fixed-rate renewal options, if any, should be included. The capitalized above-market lease values, included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as part of deferred rent receivable, are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. Total amortization related to above-market lease values was $1.1 million, $1.1 million, and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. The capitalized below-market lease values, included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as part of deferred rent liability, are amortized as an increase to rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases, including any below market renewal periods. Total amortization related to below-market lease values was $2.5 million, $2.0 million, and $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

The total amount of the remaining intangible assets acquired, which consists of in-place lease values, lease origination costs, and customer relationship intangible values, are allocated based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and our overall relationship with that respective tenant. Characteristics to be considered by management in determining these values include the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and our expectations of lease renewals (including those existing under the terms of the lease agreement), among other factors.

The value of in-place leases and lease origination costs are amortized to amortization expense over the remaining term of the respective leases, which generally range from seven to 15 years. The value of customer relationship intangibles, which is the benefit to us resulting from the likelihood of an existing tenant renewing its lease, are amortized to amortization expense over the remaining term and any anticipated renewal periods in the respective leases, but in no event does the amortization period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. Total amortization expense related to these intangible assets and liabilities was $19.2 million, $17.7 million, and $15.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

63


Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the above-market and below-market lease values would be charged to rental income and the unamortized portion of in-place lease values, lease origination costs and customer relationship intangibles will be charged to amortization expense through the revised termination date.

Impairment Charges

We account for the impairment of real estate in accordance with ASC 360-10-35, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” which requires us to periodically review the carrying value of each property to determine if circumstances indicate impairment of the carrying value of the investment exists or that depreciation periods should be modified. If circumstances indicate the possibility of impairment, we prepare a projection of the undiscounted future cash flows, without interest charges, of the specific property and determine if the carrying value of the investment in such property is recoverable. In performing the analysis, we consider such factors as each tenant’s payment history and financial condition, the likelihood of lease renewal, business conditions in the industry in which the tenants operate, whether there are indications that the fair value of the real estate has decreased or our intended holding period of the property is shortened. If the carrying amount is more than the aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, we would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property. We evaluate our entire portfolio of properties each quarter for any impairment indicators and perform an impairment analysis on those select properties that have an indication of impairment.

Held for Sale Property

For properties considered held for sale, we cease depreciating and amortizing the property and value the property at the lower of depreciated and amortized cost or fair value, less costs to dispose. We present qualifying assets and liabilities and the results of operations that have been sold, or otherwise qualify as held for sale, as discontinued operations in all periods when the sale meets the definition of discontinued operations. Under GAAP, the definition of discontinued operations is the disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed or is classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on our operations and financial results. The components of the property’s net income (loss) that are reflected as discontinued operations if classified as such include operating results, depreciation, amortization, and interest expense.

When properties are considered held for sale, but do not qualify as a discontinued operation, we present qualifying assets and liabilities as held for sale in the consolidated balance sheet in all periods that the qualifying assets and liabilities meet the held for sale criteria under ASC 360-10-49-9. The components of the held for sale property’s net income (loss) is recorded within continuing operations under the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider cash equivalents to be short-term, highly-liquid investments that are both readily convertible to cash and have a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase, except that any such investments purchased with funds held in escrow or similar accounts are classified as restricted cash. Items classified as cash equivalents include money-market deposit accounts. At times, the balance of our cash and cash equivalents may exceed federally insurable limits.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists of security deposits and receipts from tenants for reserves. These funds will be released to the tenants upon completion of agreed upon tasks, as specified in the lease agreements, mainly consisting of maintenance and repairs on the buildings and upon receipt by us of evidence of insurance and tax payments. For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, changes in restricted cash caused by changes in reserves held for tenants are shown as investing activities. Changes in restricted cash caused by changes in security deposits are reflected as financing activities.

Funds Held in Escrow

Funds held in escrow consist of funds held by certain of our lenders for properties held as collateral by these lenders. These funds will be released to us upon completion of agreed upon tasks, as specified in the mortgage agreements, mainly consisting of maintenance and repairs on the buildings, and when evidence of insurance and tax payments has been submitted to the lenders. For the purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, changes in funds held in escrow caused by changes in lender held reserve balances are shown as investing activities.


64

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs consist of costs incurred to obtain financing, including legal fees, origination fees and administrative fees. The costs are deferred and amortized using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method, over the term of the secured financing. We made payments of $2.5 million, $0.4 million, and $2.0 million for deferred financing costs during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Total amortization expense related to deferred financing costs is included in interest expense and was $1.6 million, $1.4 million, and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

Gains on Sale of Real Estate, Net

Gains on sale of real estate, net, consist of the excess consideration received for a property over the property carrying value at the time of sale, or gains on real estate, offset by consideration received for a property less than the property carrying value at the time of sale, or loss on sale of real estate. We recognize gains on sale of real estate, net, in accordance with GAAP.

Revenue Recognition

Lease revenue includes rents that each tenant pays in accordance with the terms of its respective lease reported evenly over the non-cancelable term of the lease. Most of our leases contain rental increases at specified intervals. We recognize such revenues on a straight-line basis. Deferred rent receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet includes the cumulative difference between lease revenue, as recorded on a straight-line basis, and rents received from the tenants in accordance with the lease terms, along with the capitalized above-market in-place lease values of certain acquired properties. Deferred rent liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet includes the capitalized below-market in-place lease values of certain acquired properties. Accordingly, we determine, in our judgment, to what extent the deferred rent receivable applicable to each specific tenant is collectible. We review deferred rent receivable, as it relates to straight line rents, on a quarterly basis and take into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the geographic area in which the property is located. In the event that the collectability of deferred rent with respect to any given tenant is in doubt, we record an allowance for uncollectible accounts or record a direct write-off of the specific rent receivable. We incurred $0.2 million in deferred rent write offs during the year ended December 31, 2018. No such reserves or direct write offs were recorded during the year ended 2019 and 2017, respectively.

Tenant recovery revenue includes payments from tenants as reimbursements for franchise taxes, management fees, insurance, maintenance and repairs, utilities, and ground lease payments. We recognize tenant recovery revenue in the same periods that we incur the related expenses. We do not record any tenant recovery revenues or operating expenses associated with costs paid directly by our tenants for our net leased properties.

Income Taxes

We have operated and intend to continue to operate in a manner that will allow us to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and, accordingly, will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders (except income from foreclosure property), provided that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders and meet certain other conditions. To the extent that we satisfy the distribution requirement but distribute less than 100% of our taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on our undistributed income.

Commercial Advisers is a wholly-owned TRS that is subject to federal and state income taxes. Though Commercial Advisers has had no activity to date, we would account for any future income taxes in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, “Income Taxes.” Under ASC 740-10-25, we would account for income taxes using the asset and liability method under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.

We may recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position when it is more-likely-than-not (defined as a likelihood of more than 50%) that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. If a tax position does not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, despite our belief that the filing position is supportable, the benefit of that tax position is not recognized in the statements of operations. We recognize interest and penalties, as applicable, related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. We recognize unrecognized tax benefits in the period that the uncertainty is eliminated by either affirmative agreement of the uncertain tax position by the applicable taxing authority, or by expiration of the applicable statute of limitation. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, we did not record any provisions for uncertain tax positions.


65

Asset Retirement Obligations

ASC 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligation,” requires an entity to recognize a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability can be reasonably estimated. ASC 410-20-20 clarifies that the term “Conditional Asset Retirement Obligation” refers to a legal obligation (pursuant to existing laws or by contract) to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. ASC 410-20-25-6 clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. We have accrued a liability at the present value of the estimated payments expected to be made and corresponding increase to the cost of the related properties for disposal related to all properties constructed prior to 1985 that have, or may have, asbestos present in the building. The liabilities are accreted to their estimated obligation over the life of the leases for the respective properties. We accrued $0.2 million of liabilities in connection with acquisitions for the years ended December 31, 2019, and no liabilities in connection with acquisitions for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. We recorded accretion expense of $0.1 million in each of the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively, to general and administrative expense. Costs of future expenditures for obligations are discounted to their present value. The aggregate undiscounted obligation on all properties is $6.2 million and the discount rates used in the calculations range from 2.5% to 7.0%. We do not expect to make any material payments in conjunction with these obligations in each of the next five years.

Stock Issuance Costs

We account for stock issuance costs in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic 5.A, which states that incremental costs directly attributable to a proposed or actual offering of securities may properly be deferred and charged against the gross proceeds of the offering. Accordingly, we record costs incurred related to our ongoing equity offerings to other assets on our consolidated balance sheet and ratably apply these amounts to the cost of equity as stock is issued. If an equity offering is subsequently terminated and there are amounts remaining in other assets that have not been allocated to the cost of the offering, the remaining amounts are recorded as a general and administrative expense on our consolidated statements of operations.

Comprehensive Income

We record the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the interest rate cap and swap agreements that qualify as cash flow hedges to accumulated other comprehensive income. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, we reconciled net income to comprehensive income on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Segment Reporting

We manage our operations on an aggregated, single segment basis for purposes of assessing performance and making operating decisions, and, accordingly, have only one reporting and operating segment.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance regarding the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers. Under this guidance, an entity will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance also requires improved disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. We adopted this guidance for our annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2018 and used the modified retrospective method, under which the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance is recognized at the date of initial application. Our adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Further, as discussed below, we adopted the new guidance regarding the principles for the recognition measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases on January 1, 2019. The new revenue standard applies to executory costs and other components of revenue due under leases that are deemed to be non-lease components (examples include common area maintenance and provision of utilities), even when the revenue for such activities is not separately stipulated in the lease. Revenue from these non-lease components, which were previously recognized on a straight-line basis under previous lease guidance, are recognized under the new revenue guidance as the related services are delivered. As a result, while our total revenue recognized over the lease term does not differ under the new guidance, the revenue recognition pattern could be different. The new leasing guidance allows for an accounting election to account for each separate lease component and its associated non-lease components as a single lease component. As a lessor, we have made an accounting election to account for each separate lease component and its associated non-lease components as a single lease component. As a result of this election, our revenue recognition pattern for our leasing arrangements is consistent with how we recognized lease revenue prior to our adoption of the new leasing standard.


66

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases: Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification” (“ASU 2016-02”). The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase of the leased asset by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases today. The new standard requires lessors to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases and operating leases. We adopted ASU 2016-02, as amended, as of January 1, 2019, which resulted in the recording of additional right-of-use assets from operating leases and operating lease liabilities of approximately $6.0 million for the four operating ground lease arrangements with terms greater than one year for which we are the lessee. We adopted the modified retrospective method, where we recorded the cumulative effect of applying the guidance as of January 1, 2019. We also adopted the full suite of practical expedients provided under this guidance, whereby we are not reassessing whether a contract is or contains a lease, the lease classification and the initial direct costs incurred upon onset of our leases. We have also adopted the hindsight practical expedient whereby we can use hindsight to determine the lease term as of the date of implementation, and we adopted the land easements practical expedient where we do not have to assess whether existing or expired land easements contain a lease. We analyzed our operating ground leases on the date of implementation and identified any option periods we believed were appropriate to include in the lease term, and discounted the future lease payments using a discount rate equivalent to a treasury rate with a similar lease term plus a spread ranging from 2.50% to 2.60%. This spread was determined by reviewing market premiums over treasuries for fully securitized assets. The weighted average discount rate used was 5.34%. Three of our ground leases have fixed rental charges, and one has variable charges that are driven by the consumer price index. Three of our ground leases have options to extend, and one ground lease has multiple early termination options. We will include option periods or exclude termination options in future lease payments for ground leases located in our target markets.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326).” The new standard requires more timely recognition of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair market value through net income. The standard also requires that financial assets measured at amortized cost be presented at the net amount anticipated to be collected, through an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis. We would be required to measure all expected credit losses based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the financial assets. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. We are currently evaluating the impact from adopting ASU 2016-13, but we anticipate adopting this standard will not have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

2. Related-Party Transactions

Gladstone Management Corporation and Gladstone Administration, LLC

We are externally managed pursuant to contractual arrangements with our Adviser and our Administrator, which collectively employ all of our personnel and pay their salaries, benefits, and general expenses directly. Both our Adviser and Administrator are affiliates of ours, as their parent company is owned and controlled by Mr. David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer. Two of our executive officers, Mr. Gladstone and Mr. Terry Brubaker (our vice chairman and chief operating officer) serve as directors and executive officers of our Adviser and our Administrator. Our president, Mr. Robert Cutlip, is an executive managing director of our Adviser. Mr. Michael LiCalsi, our general counsel and secretary, also serves as our Administrator’s president, general counsel and secretary. We have entered into an advisory agreement with our Adviser, as amended from time to time (the “Advisory Agreement”), and an administration agreement with our Administrator (the “Administration Agreement”). The services and fees under the Advisory Agreement and Administration Agreement are described below. At December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $2.9 million and $2.5 million, respectively, was collectively due to our Adviser and Administrator.

Base Management Fee

On January 8, 2019, we entered into a Fifth Amended and Restated Investment Advisory Agreement with the Adviser, effective as of October 1, 2018 to clarify that the agreement’s definition of Total Equity includes outstanding OP Units issued to Non-controlling OP Unitholders. Our entrance into the Advisory Agreement and each amendment thereto has been approved unanimously by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors reviews and considers renewing the agreement with our Adviser each July. During its July 2019 meeting, our Board of Directors reviewed and renewed the Advisory Agreement for an additional year, through August 31, 2020.


67

Under the Advisory Agreement, the calculation of the annual base management fee equals 1.5% of our Total Equity, which is our total stockholders’ equity plus total mezzanine equity (before giving effect to the base management fee and incentive fee), adjusted to exclude the effect of any unrealized gains or losses that do not affect realized net income (including impairment charges), adjusted for any one-time events and certain non-cash items (the later to occur for a given quarter only upon the approval of our Compensation Committee), and adjusted to include OP Units held by Non-controlling OP Unitholders. The fee is calculated and accrued quarterly as 0.375% per quarter of such Total Equity figure. Our Adviser does not charge acquisition or disposition fees when we acquire or dispose of properties as is common in other externally managed REITs; however, our Adviser may earn fee income from our borrowers, tenants or other sources.

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, we recorded a base management fee of $5.2 million, $5.1 million, and $5.0 million, respectively.

Incentive Fee

Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the calculation of the incentive fee rewards the Adviser in circumstances where our quarterly Core FFO (defined at the end of this paragraph), before giving effect to any incentive fee, or pre-incentive fee Core FFO, exceeds 2.0% quarterly, or 8.0% annualized, of adjusted total stockholders’ equity (after giving effect to the base management fee but before giving effect to the incentive fee). We refer to this as the new hurdle rate. The Adviser will receive 15.0% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee Core FFO that exceeds the new hurdle rate. However, in no event shall the incentive fee for a particular quarter exceed by 15.0% (the cap) the average quarterly incentive fee paid by us for the previous four quarters (excluding quarters for which no incentive fee was paid). Core FFO (as defined in the Advisory Agreement) is GAAP net income (loss) available to common stockholders, excluding the incentive fee, depreciation and amortization, any realized and unrealized gains, losses or other non-cash items recorded in net income (loss) available to common stockholders for the period, and one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP.

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, we recorded an incentive fee of $3.7 million, $3.0 million, and $2.4 million, respectively. The Adviser did not waive any portion of the incentive fee for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017. Waivers cannot be recouped by the Adviser in the future.

Capital Gain Fee

Under the Advisory Agreement, we will pay to the Adviser a capital gains-based incentive fee that will be calculated and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or upon termination of the Advisory Agreement). In determining the capital gain fee, we will calculate aggregate realized capital gains and aggregate realized capital losses for the applicable time period. For this purpose, aggregate realized capital gains and losses, if any, equals the realized gain or loss calculated by the difference between the sales price of the property, less any costs to sell the property and the all-in acquisition cost of the disposed property. At the end of the fiscal year, if this number is positive, then the capital gain fee payable for such time period shall equal 15.0% of such amount. No capital gain fee was recognized during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017.

Termination Fee

The Advisory Agreement includes a termination fee whereby, in the event of our termination of the agreement without cause (with 120 days’ prior written notice and the vote of at least two-thirds of our independent directors), a termination fee would be payable to the Adviser equal to two times the sum of the average annual base management fee and incentive fee earned by the Adviser during the 24-month period prior to such termination. A termination fee is also payable if the Adviser terminates the Advisory Agreement after we have defaulted and applicable cure periods have expired. The Advisory Agreement may also be terminated for cause by us (with 30 days’ prior written notice and the vote of at least two-thirds of our independent directors), with no termination fee payable. Cause is defined in the agreement to include if the Adviser breaches any material provisions thereof, the bankruptcy or insolvency of the Adviser, dissolution of the Adviser and fraud or misappropriation of funds.


68

Administration Agreement

Under the terms of the Administration Agreement, we pay separately for our allocable portion of our Administrator’s overhead expenses in performing its obligations to us including, but not limited to, rent and our allocable portion of the salaries and benefits expenses of our Administrator’s employees, including, but not limited to, our chief financial officer, treasurer, chief compliance officer, general counsel and secretary (who also serves as our Administrator’s president, general counsel and secretary), and their respective staffs. Our allocable portion of the Administrator’s expenses are generally derived by multiplying our Administrator’s total expenses by the approximate percentage of time the Administrator’s employees perform services for us in relation to their time spent performing services for all companies serviced by our Administrator under contractual agreements. We believe that the methodology of allocating the Administrator’s total expenses by approximate percentage of time services were performed among all companies serviced by our Administrator more closely approximates fees paid to actual services performed. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, we recorded an administration fee of $1.7 million, $1.6 million, and $1.3 million, respectively. Our Board of Directors reviews and considers approving or renewing the Administration Agreement each July.

Gladstone Securities, LLC

Gladstone Securities, LLC (“Gladstone Securities”), is a privately held broker dealer registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and insured by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. Gladstone Securities is an affiliate of ours, as its parent company is owned and controlled by David Gladstone, our chairman and chief executive officer. Mr. Gladstone also serves on the board of managers of Gladstone Securities.

Mortgage Financing Arrangement Agreement

We entered into an agreement with Gladstone Securities, effective June 18, 2013, for it to act as our non-exclusive agent to assist us with arranging mortgage financing for properties we own. In connection with this engagement, Gladstone Securities will, from time to time, continue to solicit the interest of various commercial real estate lenders or recommend to us third party lenders offering credit products or packages that are responsive to our needs. We pay Gladstone Securities a financing fee in connection with the services it provides to us for securing mortgage financing on any of our properties. The amount of these financing fees, which are payable upon closing of the financing, are based on a percentage of the amount of the mortgage, generally ranging from 0.15% to a maximum of 1.0% of the mortgage obtained. The amount of the financing fees may be reduced or eliminated, as determined by us and Gladstone Securities, after taking into consideration various factors, including, but not limited to, the involvement of any third party brokers and market conditions. We paid financing fees to Gladstone Securities of $0.2 million, $0.1 million, and $0.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively, which are included in mortgage notes payable, net, in the consolidated balance sheets, or 0.20%, 0.11%, and 0.24% of total mortgage principal secured or extended during the respective periods. Our Board of Directors renewed the agreement for an additional year, through August 31, 2020, at its July 2019 meeting.

3. Earnings per Share of Common Stock

The following tables set forth the computation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The OP Units held by Non-controlling OP Unitholders (which may be redeemed for shares of common stock) have been excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation, as there would be no effect on the amounts since the Non-controlling OP Unitholders’ share of income would also be added back to net income. Net income figures are presented net of such non-controlling interests in the earnings per share calculation.

We computed basic (loss) earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods. Diluted (loss) earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, reflects additional shares of common stock related to our convertible Senior Common Stock, if the effect would be dilutive, that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential shares of common stock had been issued, as well as an adjustment to net (loss) income (attributable) available to common stockholders as applicable to common stockholders that would result from their assumed issuance (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts).


69

 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
Calculation of basic (loss) earnings per share of common stock:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net (loss) income (attributable) available to common stockholders
 
$
(4,760
)
 
$
973

 
$
(4,939
)
Denominator for basic weighted average shares of common stock (1)
 
30,695,902

 
28,675,934

 
26,358,237

Basic (loss) earnings per share of common stock
 
$
(0.16
)
 
$
0.03

 
$
(0.19
)
Calculation of diluted (loss) earnings per share of common stock:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net (loss) income (attributable) available to common stockholders
 
$
(4,760
)
 
$
973

 
$
(4,939
)
Net (loss) income (attributable) available to common stockholders plus assumed conversions (2)
 
$
(4,760
)
 
$
973

 
$
(4,939
)
Denominator for basic weighted average shares of common stock (1)
 
30,695,902

 
28,675,934

 
26,358,237

Effect of convertible Senior Common Stock (2)
 
—

 
—

 
—

Denominator for diluted weighted average shares of common stock (2)
 
30,695,902

 
28,675,934

 
26,358,237

Diluted (loss) earnings per share of common stock
 
$
(0.16
)
 
$
0.03

 
$
(0.19
)
 
(1)
The weighted average number of OP Units held by Non-controlling OP Unitholders was 700,924 and 128,233 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company was the sole holder of OP Units during December 31, 2017.
(2)
We excluded convertible shares of Senior Common Stock of 674,611, 724,336 and 753,881 from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, because it was anti-dilutive.

4. Real Estate and Intangible Assets

Real Estate

The following table sets forth the components of our investments in real estate as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, excluding real estate held for sale as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (dollars in thousands):
 
 
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
Real estate:
 
 
 
 
Land
 
$
137,532

 
$
125,905

Building and improvements
 
851,245

 
755,584

Tenant improvements
 
68,201

 
65,160

Accumulated depreciation
 
(207,523
)
 
(178,257
)
Real estate, net
 
$
849,455

 
$
768,392

 

Real estate depreciation expense on building and tenant improvements was $32.8 million, $29.9 million, and $26.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

Acquisitions

During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 we acquired 18 and five properties, respectively, which are summarized below (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended
 
Aggregate Square Footage
 
Weighted Average Lease Term
 
Aggregate Purchase Price
 
Acquisition Costs
 
Aggregate Annualized GAAP Rent
 
Aggregate Mortgage Debt Issued or Assumed
 
December 31, 2019
(1)
2,562,483

 
12.8 Years
 
$
130,313

 
$
1,231

(3)
$
10,009

 
$
37,410

 
December 31, 2018
(2)
591,037

 
11.1 Years
 
$
63,245

 
$
905

(3)
$
5,984

 
$
11,663

(4)


70

(1)
On February 8, 2019, we acquired a 26,050 square foot property in Moorestown, New Jersey for $2.7 million. The annualized GAAP rent on the 15.1 year lease is $0.2 million. On February 28, 2019, we acquired a 34,800 square foot property in Indianapolis, Indiana for $3.6 million. The annualized GAAP rent on the 10.0 year lease is $0.3 million. On April 5, 2019, we acquired a 383,000 square foot, two property portfolio located in Ocala, Florida for $19.2 million. This portfolio has a weighted average lease term of 20.1 years, and annualized GAAP rent of $1.5 million. On April 30, 2019, we acquired a 54,430 square foot property in Columbus, Ohio for $3.2 million. The annualized GAAP rent on the 7.0 year lease is $0.2 million. On June 18, 2019, we acquired a 676,031 square foot property in Tifton, Georgia, for $17.9 million. The annualized GAAP rent on the 8.5 year lease is $1.6 million. We issued $8.9 million of mortgage debt with a fixed interest rate of 4.35% in connection with this acquisition. On July 30, 2019, we acquired a 78,452 square foot property in Denton, Texas, for $6.6 million. The annualized GAAP rent on the 11.9 year lease is $0.5 million. On September 26, 2019, we acquired a 211,000 square foot two property portfolio in Temple, Texas, for $14.1 million. The portfolio has a weighted average lease term of 20.0 years, and annualized GAAP rent of $1.2 million. On November 14, 2019, we acquired a 231,509 square foot property in Indianapolis, Indiana, for $8.2 million. The annualized GAAP rent on the 13.5 year lease is $0.6 million. On December 16, 2019, we acquired a 241,000 square foot property in Jackson, Tennessee, for $9.1 million. The annualized GAAP rent on the 9.7 year lease is $0.7 million. We issued $4.8 million of mortgage debt with a fixed interest rate of 3.97% in connection with this acquisition. On December 17, 2019, we acquired a 117,000 square foot property in Carrollton, Georgia, for $8.1 million. The annualized GAAP rent on the 12.0 year lease is $0.6 million. We issued $4.2 million of mortgage debt with a fixed interest rate of 3.97% in connection with this acquisition. On December 17, 2019, we acquired a 509,211 square foot six property portfolio, for $37.6 million. The portfolio has a weighted average lease term of 10.0 years, and annualized GAAP rent of $2.7 million. We issued $19.5 million of mortgage debt with a fixed interest rate of 3.75% in connection with this acquisition.
(2)
On March 9, 2018, we acquired a 127,444 square foot property in Vance, Alabama for $14.3 million. The annualized GAAP rent on the 9.8 year lease is $1.1 million. On September 20, 2018, we acquired a 157,810 square foot property in Columbus, Ohio for $8.5 million. We entered into an interest rate swap in connection with our $4.7 million of issued debt on our Columbus, Ohio acquisition resulting in a fixed interest rate of 5.32% on such debt. The annualized GAAP rent on the 15.0 year lease is $0.8 million. On October 30, 2018, we acquired a 218,703 square foot, two property portfolio located in Detroit, Michigan for $21.7 million. We assumed $6.9 million of mortgage debt with a fixed interest rate of 4.63% and issued 742,937 OP Units in connection with this acquisition. This portfolio has a weighted average lease term of 10.5 years, and annualized GAAP rent of $1.7 million. On December 27, 2018, we acquired an 87,080 square foot property in Lake Mary, Florida for $18.7 million. The annualized GAAP rent on the 11.0 year lease is $2.4 million.
(3)
We accounted for these transactions under ASU 2017-01. As a result, we treated our acquisitions during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 as asset acquisitions rather than business combinations. As a result of this treatment, we capitalized $1.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of acquisition costs that would otherwise have been expensed under business combination treatment.
(4)
We entered into an interest rate swap in connection with $4.7 million of issued debt on our Columbus, Ohio acquisition, pursuant to which we will pay our counterparty a fixed interest rate of 3.22%, and receive a variable interest rate of one month LIBOR from our counterparty. Our total interest rate on this debt is fixed at 5.32%. We have elected to treat this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge, and all changes in fair market value will be recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income on the consolidated balance sheets.

We determined the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed related to the properties acquired during the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, as follows (dollars in thousands):

 
 
Year ended December 31, 2019
 
Year ended December 31, 2018
Acquired assets and liabilities
 
Purchase price
 
Purchase price
Land
 
$
12,351

 
$
6,278

Building
 
93,502

 
44,754

Tenant Improvements
 
3,119

 
2,400

In-place Leases
 
9,013

 
4,418

Leasing Costs
 
7,274

 
3,933

Customer Relationships
 
5,019

 
2,698

Above Market Leases
 
1,950

 
239

Below Market Leases (1)
 
(1,915
)
 
(1,475
)
Total Purchase Price
 
$
130,313

 
$
63,245

(1)
This amount includes $187 of prepaid rent included in Other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

71


Significant Real Estate Activity on Existing Assets

During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we executed six and three leases, respectively, which are aggregated below (dollars in thousands):


Year Ended
 
Aggregate Square Footage
 
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term
 
Aggregate Annualized GAAP Rent
 
Aggregate Tenant Improvement
 
Aggregate Leasing Commissions
December 31, 2019

266,021

 
9.0 Years
(1)
$
3,739

 
$
2,215

 
$
1,312

December 31, 2018
 
97,178

 
6.3 Years
(2)
$
1,253

 
$
433

 
$
242

(1)
Weighted average lease term is weighted according to the annualized GAAP rent earned by each lease. Our leases have terms ranging from 5.0 years to 11.5 years.
(2)
Weighted average lease term is weighted according to the annualized GAAP rent earned by each lease. Our leases have terms ranging from 3.6 years to 7.0 years.

During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we had three and two lease contractions or terminations, respectively, which are aggregated below (dollars in thousands):

Year Ended
 
Aggregate Square Footage Reduced
 
Aggregate Square Footage Remaining
 
Aggregate Termination Fee
 
Aggregate Deferred Rent Write Off
December 31, 2019
(1)
111,309

 
39,417

 
$
301

 
$
—

December 31, 2018
(2)
44,032

 
169,133

 
559

 
184

(1)
A tenant in one of our Columbus, Ohio properties exercised a lease termination option effective October 31, 2019. In connection with this termination, we earned a termination fee of $0.1 million, which was recognized through lease revenue on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The tenant in our Fridley, Minnesota property executed a termination agreement to vacate the property on March 31, 2020. In connection with the early termination, we will earn a termination fee of $0.2 million, which is recognized through lease revenue on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income through the remaining lease term. The tenant in one of our Mason, Ohio properties executed a lease contraction in conjunction with a lease renewal. At the conclusion of their current lease term on June 30, 2020, they will continue to lease 39,417 square feet through June 30, 2030.
(2)
A tenant in our Salt Lake City, Utah property exercised a lease contraction to reduce their occupancy in our building by 23,632 square feet. They will continue to lease 81,271 square feet through their original lease term. In connection with this contraction, we will earn a contraction fee of $0.3 million, which is recognized through lease revenue on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income through the contraction term, and we wrote off $0.1 million of deferred rent asset to property operating expenses on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. A tenant in our Champaign, Illinois property exercised a lease contraction to reduce its occupancy in our building by 20,400 square feet. They will continue to lease 87,862 square feet through their original lease term. In connection with this contraction, we will earn a contraction fee of $0.2 million, which is recognized through lease revenue on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income through the contraction term, and we wrote off $0.1 million of deferred rent asset to property operating expenses on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. We recorded contraction fees of $0.2 million, in the aggregate, during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Future Lease Payments

Future operating lease payments from tenants under non-cancelable leases, excluding tenant reimbursement of expenses and excluding real estate held for sale as of December 31, 2019, for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter is as follows (dollars in thousands):
 

72

Year
Tenant Lease Payments
2020
$
107,159

2021
101,794

2022
94,252

2023
86,460

2024
77,414

Thereafter
307,591

 
$
774,670


Future minimum lease payments from tenants under non-cancelable leases, excluding tenant reimbursement of expenses and real estate held for sale as of December 31, 2018, for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter, is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Year
Tenant Lease Payments
2019
$
103,322

2020
97,302

2021
89,057

2022
82,336

2023
74,337

Thereafter
279,424

 
$
725,778

 
In accordance with the lease terms, substantially all operating expenses are required to be paid by the tenant; however, we would be required to pay operating expenses on the respective properties in the event the tenants fail to pay them.

Intangible Assets

The following table summarizes the carrying value of intangible assets, liabilities and the accumulated amortization for each intangible asset and liability class as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, excluding real estate held for sale as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (dollars in thousands):
 
 
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
 
Lease Intangibles
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Lease Intangibles
 
Accumulated Amortization
In-place leases
 
$
92,906

 
$
(48,468
)
 
$
83,894

 
$
(40,445
)
Leasing costs
 
68,256

 
(33,705
)
 
59,671

 
(28,092
)
Customer relationships
 
65,363

 
(28,887
)
 
60,455

 
(24,035
)
 
 
$
226,525

 
$
(111,060
)
 
$
204,020

 
$
(92,572
)
 
 
Deferred Rent Receivable/(Liability)
 
Accumulated (Amortization)/Accretion
 
Deferred Rent Receivable/(Liability)
 
Accumulated (Amortization)/Accretion
Above market leases
 
$
16,502

 
$
(10,005
)
 
$
14,551

 
$
(8,981
)
Below market leases and deferred revenue
 
(34,322
)
 
15,000

 
(29,807
)
 
12,502

 
 
$
(17,820
)
 
$
4,995

 
$
(15,256
)
 
$
3,521


Total amortization expense related to in-place leases, leasing costs and customer relationship lease intangible assets was $19.2 million, $17.7 million, and $15.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively, and is included in depreciation and amortization expense in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.

Total amortization related to above-market lease values was $1.1 million, $1.1 million, and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively, and is included in lease revenue in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.

73


Total amortization related to below-market lease values was $2.5 million, $2.0 million, and $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively, and is included in lease revenue in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income.

The weighted average amortization periods in years for the intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, were as follows:
 
Intangible Assets & Liabilities
 
2019
 
2018
In-place leases
 
13.6
 
11.7
Leasing costs
 
13.6
 
11.7
Customer relationships
 
19.0
 
19.3
Above market leases
 
10.7
 
10.4
Below market leases
 
10.3
 
12.4
All intangible assets & liabilities
 
15.0
 
13.6

The estimated aggregate amortization expense to be recorded for in-place leases, leasing costs and customer relationships for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter is as follows, excluding real estate held for sale as of December 31, 2019 (dollars in thousands):
 
Year
Estimated Amortization Expense
of In-Place Leases, Leasing
Costs and Customer
Relationships
2020
$
20,919

2021
17,920

2022
15,313

2023
13,119

2024
10,949

Thereafter
37,245


$
115,465


The estimated aggregate rental income to be recorded for the amortization of both above and below market leases for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter is as follows, excluding real estate held for sale as of December 31, 2019 (dollars in thousands):
 
Year
Net Increase to Rental Income
Related to Above and Below
Market Leases
2020
$
2,674

2021
2,218

2022
1,746

2023
1,378

2024
1,411

Thereafter
3,212


$
12,639

(1) Does not include ground lease amortization of $186.

5. Real Estate Dispositions, Held for Sale, and Impairment Charges

Real Estate Dispositions


74

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we continued to execute our capital recycling program, whereby we sold properties outside of our core markets and redeployed proceeds to either fund property acquisitions in our target secondary growth markets, or repay outstanding debt. We expect to continue to execute our capital recycling plan and sell non-core properties as reasonable disposition opportunities become available. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold one non-core property, located in Maitland, Florida, which is detailed in the table below (dollars in thousands):

Square Footage Sold
 
Sales Price
 
Sales Costs
 
Gain on Sale of Real Estate, net
50,000

 
$
6,850

 
$
532

 
$
2,952


Our 2019 disposition was not classified as discontinued operations because it did not represent a strategic shift in operations, nor will it have a major effect on our operations and financial results. Accordingly, the operating results of this property are included within continuing operations for all periods reported.

The table below summarizes the components of operating income from the real estate and related assets disposed of during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively (dollars in thousands):
 
 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
Operating revenue
 
$
245


$
1,007

 
$
416

Operating expense
 
786


1,004

 
471

Other income, net
 
2,614

(1)
(334
)
 
(142
)
Income (expense) from real estate and related assets sold
 
$
2,073

 
$
(331
)
 
$
(197
)
  (1) Includes $3.0 million gain on sale of real estate, net.

Real Estate Held for Sale

At December 31, 2019, we had one property classified as held for sale, located in Charlotte, North Carolina. We considered the asset to be non-core to our long term strategy.

At December 31, 2018, we had one property classified as held for sale, located in Maitland, Florida. This property was sold during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Our asset classified as held for sale at December 31, 2019 was not classified as discontinued operations because it does not represent a strategic shift in our operations, and it does not have a major effect on our financial results.

The table below summarizes the components of income from real estate and related assets held for sale at December 31, 2019 (dollars in thousands):

 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
Operating revenue
 
$
600

 
$
1,167

 
$
1,156

Operating expense
 
2,220

(1)
307

 
291

Other income, net
 
323

 
(36
)
 
(240
)
Income (expense) from real estate and related assets sold
 
$
(1,297
)
 
$
824

 
$
625

  (1) Includes $1.8 million impairment charge.

The table below summarizes the components of the assets and liabilities held for sale reflected on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet (dollars in thousands):
 

75

 
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
Assets Held for Sale
 
 
 
 
Real estate, at cost
 
$
7,411

 
$
3,173

Less: accumulated depreciation
 
3,421

 
218

Total real estate held for sale, net
 
3,990

 
2,955

Lease intangibles, net
 
—

 
1,105

Deferred rent receivable, net
 
—

 
91

Total Assets Held for Sale
 
$
3,990

 
$
4,151

Liabilities Held for Sale
 
 
 
 
Asset retirement obligation
 
$
21

 
$
—

Total Liabilities Held for Sale
 
$
21

 
$
—


Impairment Charges

We evaluated our portfolio for triggering events to determine if any of our held and used assets were impaired during the year ended December 31, 2019 and did not identify any impaired held and used assets during the fourth quarter of 2019.

We classified one property as held for sale at December 31, 2019. We performed an analysis of the property classified as held for sale, and compared the fair market value of the asset less selling costs against the carrying value of the asset available for sale. As a result of this analysis, we recorded an impairment charge of $1.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, as the fair market value less selling costs was less than the carrying value.

We classified one property as held for sale at December 31, 2018. We performed an analysis of the property classified as held for sale, and compared the fair market value of the asset less selling costs against the carrying value of the asset available for sale. We did not record an impairment charge during the year ended December 31, 2018, as the fair market value less selling costs was greater than the carrying value.

Fair market value for this asset was calculated using Level 3 inputs (defined in Note 6 “Mortgage Notes Payable and Credit Facility”), which were determined using a negotiated sales price from an executed purchase and sale agreement with a third party. We continue to evaluate our properties on a quarterly basis for changes that could create the need to record impairment. Future impairment losses may result, and could be significant, should market conditions deteriorate in the markets in which we hold our assets or we are unable to secure leases at terms that are favorable to us, which could impact the estimated cash flow of our properties over the period in which we plan to hold our properties. Additionally, changes in management’s decisions to either own and lease long-term or sell a particular asset will have an impact on this analysis.

We recognized $6.8 million of impairment charges on three properties during the year ended December 31, 2017. These properties were impaired through our held for sale carrying value analysis during the year ended December 31, 2017, and we concluded that the fair market value less selling costs was below the carrying value of the respective properties. We sold two of these properties during the year ended December 31, 2017, and one of these properties during the year ended December 31, 2018.

The fair values for the above properties were calculated using Level 3 inputs which were calculated using an estimated sales price, less estimated costs to sell. The estimated sales price was determined using executed purchase and sale agreements.

6. Mortgage Notes Payable and Credit Facility

Our revolving credit facility and term loan facility are collectively referred to herein as the Credit Facility.

Our mortgage notes payable and Credit Facility as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are summarized below (dollars in thousands):
 

76

 
 
Encumbered properties at
 
Carrying Value at
 
Stated Interest Rates at
 
Scheduled Maturity Dates at
 
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
December 31, 2019

December 31, 2019
Mortgage and other secured loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed rate mortgage loans
 
58

 
$
412,771

 
$
385,051

 
(1)
 
(2)
Variable rate mortgage loans
 
12

 
45,151

 
60,659

 
(3)
 
(2)
Premiums and discounts, net
 
-

 
(239
)
 
(301
)
 
N/A
 
N/A
Deferred financing costs, mortgage loans, net
 
-

 
(3,944
)
 
(4,063
)
 
N/A
 
N/A
Total mortgage notes payable, net
 
70

 
$
453,739

 
$
441,346

 
(4)
 
 
Variable rate revolving credit facility
 
46

(6)
$
52,400

 
$
50,600

 
LIBOR + 1.65%
 
7/2/2023
Deferred financing costs, revolving credit facility
 
-

 
(821
)
 
(516
)
 
N/A
 
N/A
Total revolver, net
 
46

 
$
51,579

 
$
50,084

 
 
 
 
Variable rate term loan facility
 
-

 
$
122,300

 
$
75,000

 
LIBOR + 1.60%
 
7/2/2024
Deferred financing costs, term loan facility
 
-

 
(1,024
)
 
(371
)
 
N/A
 
N/A
Total term loan, net
 
N/A

 
$
121,276

 
$
74,629

 
 
 
 
Total mortgage notes payable and credit facility
 
116

 
$
626,594

 
$
566,059

 
(5)
 
 
 
(1)
Interest rates on our fixed rate mortgage notes payable vary from 3.42% to 6.63%.
(2)
We have 54 mortgage notes payable with maturity dates ranging from 7/1/2020 through 8/1/2037.
(3)
Interest rates on our variable rate mortgage notes payable vary from one month LIBOR + 2.00% to one month LIBOR +2.75%. At December 31, 2019, one month LIBOR was approximately 1.76%.
(4)
The weighted average interest rate on the mortgage notes outstanding at December 31, 2019, was approximately 4.49%.
(5)
The weighted average interest rate on all debt outstanding at December 31, 2019, was approximately 4.18%.
(6)
The amount we may draw under our Credit Facility is based on a percentage of the fair value of a combined pool of 46 unencumbered properties as of December 31, 2019.
N/A - Not Applicable

Mortgage Notes Payable

As of December 31, 2019, we had 54 mortgage notes payable, collateralized by a total of 70 properties with a net book value of $671.6 million. Gladstone Commercial Corporation has limited recourse liabilities that could result from any one or more of the following circumstances: a borrower voluntarily filing for bankruptcy, improper conveyance of a property, fraud or material misrepresentation, misapplication or misappropriation of rents, security deposits, insurance proceeds or condemnation proceeds, or physical waste or damage to the property resulting from a borrower’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. We have full recourse for $4.8 million of the mortgage notes payable, net or 1.1% of the outstanding balance. We will also indemnify lenders against claims resulting from the presence of hazardous substances or activity involving hazardous substances in violation of environmental laws on a property.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we partially repaid one mortgage collateralized by three properties, releasing one of the collateralized properties that we sold on January 31, 2019, and fully repaid four mortgages collateralized by eight properties, all of which are summarized below (dollars in thousands):
Aggregate Fixed Rate Debt Repaid
 
Weighted Average Interest Rate on Fixed Rate Debt Repaid
$
31,385

 
4.55
%

Aggregate Variable Rate Debt Repaid
 
Weighted Average Interest Rate on Variable Rate Debt Repaid
$
13,600

 
LIBOR +
2.47%


77

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we issued 11 mortgages, collateralized by 11 properties, which are summarized below (dollars in thousands):

Aggregate Fixed Rate Debt Issued
 
Weighted Average Interest Rate on Fixed Rate Debt
$
69,650

(1)
3.90
%

(1)
We issued $10.6 million of fixed rate debt in connection with one property acquired on December 27, 2018, with a maturity date of February 8, 2029. The interest rate is fixed at 4.7% for the first seven years of the mortgage. After the fixed interest rate period expires, we have the option to adjust the interest rate to a fixed interest rate equal to 1.8%, plus the three-year treasury rate per annum, or a variable interest rate equal to 1.8%, plus the 30 day LIBOR rate per annum. On May 31, 2019, we issued $21.6 million of floating rate debt swapped to fixed rate debt of 3.42% in connection with refinancing mortgage debt on one property with a new maturity date of June 1, 2024. We issued $8.9 million of fixed rate debt in connection with our June 18, 2019 property acquisition with a maturity date of June 18, 2024 and a rate of 4.35%. We issued $4.8 million of fixed rate debt in connection with our December 16, 2019 property acquisition with a maturity date of December 10, 2026 and a rate of 3.97%. We issued $4.2 million of fixed rate debt in connection with our December 17, 2019 property acquisition with a maturity date of December 17, 2026 and a rate of 3.97%. We issued an aggregate $19.5 million of fixed rate debt in connection with our December 17, 2019 six property portfolio acquisition with a maturity date of January 1, 2027 and a rate of 3.75%.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we extended the maturity dates of two mortgages, collateralized by four properties, which are summarized below (dollars in thousands):

Aggregate Variable Rate Debt Extended
 
Weighted Average Interest Rate on Variable Rate Debt Extended
 
Weighted Average Extension Term
$
12,561

 
LIBOR +
2.51%
 
2.4 years

Scheduled principal payments of mortgage notes payable for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter are as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
Year
 
Scheduled Principal Payments
 
2020
 
$
31,259

 
2021
 
38,554

 
2022
 
106,933

 
2023
 
71,238

 
2024
 
48,318

 
Thereafter
 
161,620

 
 
 
$
457,922

(1)
 
(1)
This figure is does not include $(0.2) million premiums and (discounts), net, and $3.9 million of deferred financing costs, which are reflected in mortgage notes payable on the consolidated balance sheet.

We believe we will be able to address all mortgage notes payable maturing over the next 12 months through a combination of refinancing our existing indebtedness, cash from operations, proceeds from one or more equity offerings and availability on our Credit Facility.


78

Interest Rate Caps and Swaps

We have entered into interest rate cap agreements that cap the interest rate on certain of our variable-rate debt and we have assumed or entered into interest rate swap agreements in which we hedged our exposure to variable interest rates by agreeing to pay fixed interest rates to our respective counterparty. We have adopted the fair value measurement provisions for our financial instruments recorded at fair value. The fair value guidance establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. Generally, we will estimate the fair value of our interest rate caps and interest rate swaps, in the absence of observable market data, using estimates of value including estimated remaining life, counterparty credit risk, current market yield and interest rate spreads of similar securities as of the measurement date. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, our interest rate cap and interest rate swap agreements were valued using Level 2 inputs.

The fair value of the interest rate cap agreements is recorded in other assets on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We record changes in the fair value of the interest rate cap agreements quarterly based on the current market valuations at quarter end. If the interest rate cap qualifies for hedge accounting, the change in the estimated fair value is recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income to the extent that it is effective, with any ineffective portion recorded to interest expense in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. If the interest rate cap does not qualify for hedge accounting, or if it is determined the hedge is ineffective, any change in the fair value is recognized in interest expense in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The following table summarizes the interest rate caps at December 31, 2019 and 2018 (dollars in thousands):
 
 
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
Aggregate Cost
 
Aggregate Notional Amount
 
Aggregate Fair Value
 
Aggregate Notional Amount
 
Aggregate Fair Value
$
1,596

(1)
$
166,728

 
$
250

 
$
134,678

 
$
622

(1)
We have entered into various interest rate cap agreements on new variable rate debt with LIBOR caps ranging from 2.50% to 3.25%.

We have assumed or entered into interest rate swap agreements in connection with certain of our acquisitions, whereby we will pay our counterparty a fixed interest rate on a monthly basis, and receive payments from our counterparty equivalent to the stipulated floating rate. The fair value of our interest rate swap agreements are recorded in other liabilities on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We have designated our interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges, and we record changes in the fair value of the respective interest rate swap agreement to accumulated other comprehensive income on the consolidated balance sheets. We record changes in fair value on a quarterly basis, using current market valuations at quarter end. The following table summarizes our interest rate swaps at December 31, 2019 and 2018 (dollars in thousands):

December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
Aggregate Notional Amount
 
Aggregate Fair Value Asset
 
Aggregate Fair Value Liability
 
Aggregate Notional Amount
 
Aggregate Fair Value Asset
 
Aggregate Fair Value Liability
$
45,777

 
$
—

 
$
(1,173
)
 
$
24,732

 
$
451

 
$
(396
)

The following tables present the impact of our derivative instruments in the consolidated financial statements (dollars in thousands):

 
 
Amount of (Loss) Gain, net recognized in Comprehensive Income
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate caps
 
$
(749
)
 
$
77

 
$
(239
)
Interest rate swaps
 
(1,229
)
 
(260
)
 
274

Total
 
$
(1,978
)
 
$
(183
)
 
$
35


The following table sets forth certain information regarding our derivative instruments (dollars in thousands):


79

 
 
 
 
Asset (Liability) Derivatives Fair Value at
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
December 31, 2019

 
December 31, 2018

Interest rate caps
 
Other assets
 
$
250

 
$
552

Interest rate swaps
 
Other assets
 
—

 
451

Interest rate swaps
 
Other liabilities
 
(1,173
)
 
(396
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate caps
 
Other assets
 
$
—

 
70

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total derivative (liabilities) assets
 
 
 
$
(923
)
 
$
677



The fair value of all mortgage notes payable outstanding as of December 31, 2019 was $466.1 million, as compared to the carrying value stated above of $453.7 million. The fair value is calculated based on a discounted cash flow analysis, using management’s estimate of market interest rates on long-term debt with comparable terms and loan to value ratios. The fair value was calculated using Level 3 inputs of the hierarchy established by ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.”

Credit Facility

On August 7, 2013, we procured our senior unsecured revolving credit facility (“Revolver”) with KeyBank National Association (“KeyBank”) (serving as revolving lender, a letter of credit issuer and an administrative agent). In October 2015, we expanded our Revolver to $85.0 million and entered into a term loan facility (“Term Loan”) whereby we added a $25.0 million, five-year Term Loan subject to the same leverage tiers as the Revolver, with the interest rate at each leverage tier being five basis points lower than that of the Revolver. We have the option to repay the Term Loan in full, or in part, at any time without penalty or premium prior to the maturity date.

On October 27, 2017, we amended this Credit Facility, increasing the Term Loan from $25.0 million, to $75.0 million, with the Revolver commitment remaining at $85.0 million. The Term Loan maturity date was extended to October 27, 2022, and the Revolver maturity date was extended to October 27, 2021. In connection with the amendment, the interest rate for the Credit Facility was reduced by 25 basis points at each of the leverage tiers. At the time of amendment, we entered into multiple interest rate cap agreements on the amended Term Loan, which cap LIBOR at 2.75% to hedge our exposure to variable interest rates.

On July 2, 2019, we amended, extended and upsized our Credit Facility, expanding the Term Loan from $75.0 million to $160.0 million, inclusive of a delayed draw component whereby we can incrementally borrow on the Term Loan up to the $160.0 million commitment, and increasing the Revolver from $85.0 million to $100.0 million. The Term Loan has a new five-year term, with a maturity date of July 2, 2024, and the Revolver has a new four-year term, with a maturity date of July 2, 2023. The interest rate margin for the Credit Facility was reduced by 10 basis points at each of the leverage tiers. We entered into multiple interest rate cap agreements on the amended Term Loan, which cap LIBOR ranging from 2.50% to 2.75%, to hedge our exposure to variable interest rates. We used the net proceeds derived from the amended Credit Facility to repay all previously existing borrowings under the Revolver. We incurred fees of approximately $1.3 million in connection with the Credit Facility amendment. The bank syndicate for the Credit Facility is now comprised of KeyBank, Fifth Third Bank, U.S. Bank National Association, The Huntington National Bank, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.

As of December 31, 2019, there was $174.7 million outstanding under our Credit Facility at a weighted average interest rate of approximately 3.38% and $12.0 million outstanding under letters of credit at a weighted average interest rate of 1.65%. As of December 31, 2019, the maximum additional amount we could draw under the Credit Facility was $20.5 million. We were in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2019.

The amount outstanding under the Credit Facility approximates fair value as of December 31, 2019.


80

7. Commitments and Contingencies

Ground Leases

We are obligated as lessee under four ground leases. Future minimum rental payments due under the terms of these leases as of December 31, 2019, are as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
Year
 
Future Lease Payments Due Under Operating Leases
2020
 
466

2021
 
477

2022
 
489

2023
 
492

2024
 
493

Thereafter
 
7,799

Total anticipated lease payments
 
$
10,216

Less: amount representing interest
 
(4,369
)
Present value of lease payments
 
$
5,847


Rental expense incurred for properties with ground lease obligations was $0.5 million each for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. Our ground leases are treated as operating leases and rental expenses are reflected in property operating expenses on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. Our ground leases have a weighted average remaining lease term of 22.9 years.

Future minimum rental payments due under the terms of these leases as of December 31, 2018 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

For the year ended December 31,
 
Minimum Rental Payments Due
2019
 
465

2020
 
466

2021
 
392

2022
 
319

2023
 
322

Thereafter
 
3,914

Total
 
$
5,878


Letters of Credit

As of December 31, 2019, there was $12.0 million outstanding under letters of credit. These letters of credit are not reflected on our consolidated balance sheet.

8. Equity and Mezzanine Equity

Distributions

We paid the following distributions per share for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017:
 

81

 
 
For the year ended December 31,
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
Common Stock and Non-controlling OP Units
 
$
1.500

 
$
1.500

 
$
1.500

Senior Common Stock
 
1.0500

 
1.0500

 
1.0500

Series A Preferred Stock
 
1.6038191

(1)
1.9374996

 
1.9374996

Series B Preferred Stock
 
1.5521

(1)
1.8750

 
1.8750

Series D Preferred Stock
 
1.7500

 
1.7500

 
1.7500

Series E Preferred Stock
 
0.4049

(2)
—

 
—

(1)
We fully redeemed our Series A and B Preferred Stock on October 28, 2019, and paid all outstanding shareholders a prorated dividend for the month of October.
(2)
We issued our new Series E Preferred Stock on October 4, 2019, paying a prorated dividend for the month of October and full dividends for November and December.

For federal income tax purposes, distributions paid to stockholders may be characterized as ordinary income, capital gains, return of capital or a combination of the foregoing. The characterization of distributions during each of the last three years is reflected in the table below:
 
 
 
Ordinary Income
 
Return of Capital
 
Long-Term Capital Gains
Common Stock and OP Units
 
 
 
 
 
 
For the year ended December 31, 2017
 
39.63189
%
 
60.36811
%
 
—
%
For the year ended December 31, 2018
 
24.46913
%
 
75.53087
%
 
—
%
For the year ended December 31, 2019
 
44.46159
%
 
55.53841
%
 
—
%
Senior Common Stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
For the year ended December 31, 2017
 
100.00000
%
 
—
%
 
—
%
For the year ended December 31, 2018
 
100.00000
%
 
—
%
 
—
%
For the year ended December 31, 2019
 
100.00000
%
 
—
%
 
—
%
Series A Preferred Stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
For the year ended December 31, 2017
 
100.00000
%
 
—
%
 
—
%
For the year ended December 31, 2018
 
100.00000
%
 
—
%
 
—
%
For the year ended December 31, 2019
 
100.00000
%
 
—
%
 
—
%
Series B Preferred Stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
For the year ended December 31, 2017
 
100.00000
%
 
—
%
 
—
%
For the year ended December 31, 2018
 
100.00000
%
 
—
%
 
—
%
For the year ended December 31, 2019
 
100.00000
%
 
—
%
 
—
%
Series D Preferred Stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
For the year ended December 31, 2017
 
100.00000
%
 
—
%
 
—
%
For the year ended December 31, 2018
 
100.00000
%
 
—
%
 
—
%
For the year ended December 31, 2019
 
100.00000
%
 
—
%
 
—
%
Series E Preferred Stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
For the year ended December 31, 2017
 
—
%
 
—
%
 
—
%
For the year ended December 31, 2018
 
—
%
 
—
%
 
—
%
For the year ended December 31, 2019
 
100.00000
%
 
—
%
 
—
%


82

Recent Activity

Common Stock ATM Program

On December 3, 2019, we entered into an At-the-Market Equity Offering Sales Agreement (the “Common Stock Sales Agreement”), with Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated (“Baird”), Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC (“Goldman Sachs”), Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (“Stifel”), BTIG, LLC, and Fifth Third Securities, Inc. (“Fifth Third”) (collectively the “Common Stock Sales Agents”), pursuant to which we may sell shares of our common stock in an aggregate offering price of up to $250.0 million. Previously, we had a common stock ATM program with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co (“Cantor”) that was terminated upon entering into the Common Stock Sales Agreement. Under both programs, during the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold 3.0 million shares of common stock, raising $64.5 million in net proceeds. As of December 31, 2019, we had a remaining capacity to sell up to $237.5 million of common stock under the Common Stock Sales Agreement. The proceeds from these issuances were used to acquire real estate, repay outstanding debt and for other general corporate purposes.

Series A and B Preferred Stock ATM Programs

Previously under another open market sales agreement with Cantor (the “Series A and B Preferred ATM Program”), we could, from time to time, offer to sell (i) shares of our 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”), and (ii) shares of our 7.50% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, (“Series B Preferred Stock”), having an aggregate offering price of up to $40.0 million, through Cantor, acting as sales agent and/or principal. We did not sell any shares of our Series A or Series B Preferred Stock during the year ended December 31, 2019.

On October 28, 2019, we terminated the Series A and B Preferred ATM Program with Cantor, as the Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock were fully redeemed on this date.

Series A and B Preferred Stock Redemption

On October 28, 2019, we voluntarily redeemed all 1,000,000 outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and all 1,264,000 outstanding shares of our Series B Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $25.1506944 per share and $25.1458333 per share, respectively, which represents the liquidation preference per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends through October 28, 2019 for an aggregate redemption price of approximately $56.9 million. In connection with this redemption, we recognize a $2.7 million decrease to net income available to common shareholders pertaining to the original issuance costs incurred upon the issuance of our Series A and B Preferred Stock.

Mezzanine Equity

Both our 7.00% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series D Preferred Stock”), and 6.625% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series E Preferred Stock”) are classified as mezzanine equity in our consolidated balance sheet because both are redeemable at the option of the shareholder upon a change of control of greater than 50% in accordance with ASC 480-10-S99 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity,” which requires mezzanine equity classification for preferred stock issuances with redemption features which are outside of the control of the issuer. A change in control of the Company, outside of our control, is only possible if a tender offer is accepted by over 90% of our shareholders. All other change in control situations would require input from our Board of Directors. In addition, our Series E Preferred Stock is redeemable at the option of the shareholder in the event a delisting event occurs. We will periodically evaluate the likelihood that a change of control or delisting event of greater than 50% will take place, and if we deem this probable, we would adjust the Series D Preferred Stock and Series E Preferred Stock presented in mezzanine equity to their redemption value, with the offset to gain (loss) on extinguishment. We currently believe the likelihood of a change of control of greater than 50% is remote.

Under a third open market sales agreement with Cantor (the “Series D Preferred ATM Program”), we may, from time to time, offer to sell shares of our Series D Preferred Stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million through Cantor, acting as sales agent and/or principal. We did not sell any shares of our Series D Preferred under our Series D Preferred ATM Program during the year ended December 31, 2019. We have not allocated any funds on our Universal Shelf (defined below) towards the Series D Preferred ATM Program.


83

Series E Preferred Stock

On October 4, 2019, we completed an underwritten public offering of 2,760,000 shares of our newly designated Series E Preferred Stock, at a public offering price of $25.00 per share, raising $69.0 million in gross proceeds and approximately $66.6 million in net proceeds, after payment of underwriting discounts and commissions. We used the net proceeds from this offering to redeem all outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock, and pay down our Credit Facility.

On December 3, 2019, we entered into an At-the -Market Equity Offering Sales Agreement (the “Series E Preferred Stock Sales Agreement”), with Baird, Goldman Sachs, Stifel, Fifth Third, and U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. (the “Series E Preferred Stock Sales Agents”), pursuant to which we may, from time to time, offer to sell shares of our Series E Preferred Stock in an aggregate offering price of up to $100.0 million. We did not sell any of our Series E Preferred Stock pursuant to the Series E Preferred Stock Sales Agreement during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation

On April 11, 2018, we filed with the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation an Articles Supplementary reclassifying 3,500,000 authorized but unissued shares of our convertible senior common stock (the “Senior Common Stock”), as authorized but unissued shares of our common stock. As a result of the reclassification, there were 57,969 authorized but unissued shares of Senior Common Stock.

On April 11, 2018, we also filed with the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation an Articles of Amendment to increase the number of shares of capital stock we have authority to issue to 100,000,000 and authorized common stock to 87,700,000 shares.

On September 27, 2019, the Company filed with the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation the Articles Supplementary (i) setting forth the rights, preferences and terms of its newly designated Series E Preferred Stock and (ii) reclassifying and designating 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s authorized and unissued shares of common stock as shares of Series E Preferred Stock. The reclassification decreased the number of shares classified as common stock from 87,700,000 shares immediately prior to the reclassification to 83,700,000 shares immediately after the reclassification.

On December 2, 2019, the Company filed with the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation the Articles Supplementary reclassifying 2,600,000 authorized but unissued shares of our Series A Preferred Sock as 2,590,000 shares of our common stock and 10,000 shares of our Series E Preferred Stock, and reclassifying 2,750,000 authorized but unissued shares of our Series B Preferred Stock as 2,750,000 shares of our Series E Preferred Stock. After giving effect to such reclassifications, we have authorized 86,290,000 shares of Common Stock, 6,000,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock, 6,760,000 shares of Series E Preferred Stock and 950,000 shares of our Senior Common Stock.

Universal Shelf Registration Statement

On January 11, 2019, we filed a universal registration statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-229209, and an amendment thereto on Form-S-3/A on January 24, 2019 (collectively referred to as the “Universal Shelf”). The Universal Shelf became effective on February 13, 2019 and replaced our prior universal shelf registration statement. The Universal Shelf allows us to issue up to $500.0 million of securities. As of December 31, 2019, we had the ability to issue up to $438.0 million under the Universal Shelf.

Non-controlling Interests in Operating Partnership

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, we owned approximately 98.6% and 97.5%, respectively, of the outstanding OP Units. On October 30, 2018, we issued 742,937 OP units as partial consideration to acquire a 218,703 square foot, two property portfolio located in Detroit, Michigan for $21.7 million. During November 2019, 263,300 OP units were redeemed for Common Stock.

The Operating Partnership is required to make distributions on each OP Unit in the same amount as those paid on each share of the Company’s common stock, with the distributions on the OP Units held by the Company being utilized to make distributions to the Company’s common stockholders.

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were 479,637 and 742,937 outstanding OP Units held by Non-controlling OP Unitholders, respectively.


84

9. Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)

The following table reflects the quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (dollars in thousands):
 
 
 
Quarter ended
 
 
December 31, 2019
 
September 30, 2019
 
June 30, 2019
 
March 31, 2019
Operating revenues
 
$
29,386

 
$
28,667

 
$
28,197

 
$
28,137

Operating expenses
 
(22,462
)
 
(19,445
)
 
(19,058
)
 
(19,266
)
Other expense, net
 
(6,452
)
 
(7,031
)
 
(6,934
)
 
(4,198
)
Net income
 
472

 
2,191

 
2,205

 
4,673

Net loss (income) attributable (available) to OP Units held by Non-controlling OP Unitholders
 
100

 
16

 
16

 
(45
)
Dividends attributable to preferred and senior common stock (1)
 
(5,877
)
 
(2,838
)
 
(2,837
)
 
(2,836
)
Net (loss) income (attributable) available to common stockholders
 
(5,305
)
 
(631
)
 
(616
)
 
1,792

Net (loss) income (attributable) available to common stockholders per share - basic & diluted
 
$
(0.18
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
(0.02
)
 
$
0.06

Other Comprehensive income (loss)
 
$
356

 
$
(624
)
 
$
(988
)
 
$
(722
)
 
 
Quarter ended
 
 
December 31, 2018
 
September 30, 2018
 
June 30, 2018
 
March 31, 2018
Operating revenues
 
$
27,261

 
$
26,591

 
$
26,593

 
$
26,353

Operating expenses
 
(18,771
)
 
(17,422
)
 
(17,542
)
 
(17,402
)
Other expense, net
 
(5,973
)
 
(6,492
)
 
(6,526
)
 
(4,346
)
Net income
 
2,517

 
2,677

 
2,525

 
4,605

Net income available to OP Units held by Non-controlling OP Unitholders
 
(4
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

Dividends attributable to preferred and senior common stock
 
(2,844
)
 
(2,847
)
 
(2,842
)
 
(2,814
)
Net (loss) income (attributable) available to common stockholders
 
$
(331
)

$
(170
)

$
(317
)
 
$
1,791

Net (loss) income (attributable) available to common stockholders - basic & diluted
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
(0.01
)
 
$
0.06

Other Comprehensive (loss) income
 
$
(1,212
)
 
$
245

 
$
289

 
$
495

(1)
Includes $2.7 million of Series A and B Preferred Stock offering costs written off as a result of their redemption.
 
10. Subsequent Events

Distributions

On January 14, 2020, our Board of Directors declared the following monthly distributions for the months of January, February, and March of 2020:
 

85

Record Date
 
Payment Date
 
Common Stock and Non-controlling OP Unit Distributions per Share
 
Series D Preferred Distributions per Share
 
Series E Preferred Distributions per Share
January 24, 2020
 
January 31, 2020
 
$
0.12515

 
$
0.1458333

 
$
0.1380210

February 19, 2020
 
February 28, 2020
 
0.12515

 
0.1458333

 
0.1380210

March 20, 2020
 
March 31, 2020
 
0.12515

 
0.1458333

 
0.1380210


 
 
 
$
0.37545

 
$
0.4374999

 
$
0.4140630

 
Senior Common Stock Distributions
Payable to the Holders of Record During the Month of:
 
Payment Date
 
Distribution per Share
January
 
February 7, 2020
 
$
0.0875

February
 
March 6, 2020
 
0.0875

March
 
April 7, 2020
 
0.0875


 
 
 
$
0.2625


Equity Activity

Subsequent to December 31, 2019 and through February 12, 2020, we raised $27.9 million in net proceeds from the sale of 1.3 million shares of Common Stock under our Common Stock ATM Program. We made no sales under our Series E Preferred ATM Program subsequent to December 31, 2019 and through February 12, 2020.

Acquisition Activity

On January 8, 2020, we purchased a 64,800 square foot industrial property in Indianapolis, Indiana for $5.3 million. This property is fully leased to three tenants with a weighted average lease term of 7.2 years.

On January 27, 2020, we purchased a 320,838 square foot, three building industrial portfolio with a location in Houston, Texas; Charlotte, North Carolina; and St. Charles, Missouri for $34.7 million. This industrial portfolio is fully leased to one tenant on a 20 year lease term.

Leasing Activity

On January 9, 2020, a tenant in one of our Springfield, Missouri properties renewed their lease for an additional five years, with a new maturity date of May 31, 2026.

On January 23, 2020, the tenant in our Englewood, Colorado property renewed their lease for an additional five years, with a new maturity date of December 31, 2026

Financing Activity

On January 27, 2020, we issued an aggregate of $18.3 million of fixed rate debt in connection with the three property industrial portfolio acquired on this same date. The maturity date is February 1, 2030 and the interest rate is 3.625%

Universal Shelf Registration Statement

On January 29, 2020, we filed a universal registration statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-236143 (the “2020 Universal Shelf”). Upon its effectiveness, the 2020 Universal Shelf will allow us to issue up to $800.0 million of securities.


86


GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORPORATION
SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2019 (Dollars in Thousands)
 
 
 
Initial Cost
 
Total Cost
 
 
 
 
Location of Property
Encumbrances
Land
Buildings &
Improvements
Improvement
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Land
Buildings &
Improvements
Total 
(1)
Accumulated
Depreciation (2)
Net Real
Estate (4)
Year
Construction/
Improvements
Date
Acquired
Raleigh, North Carolina (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
$
—

$
960

$
4,481

$
35

$
960

$
4,516

$
5,476

$
2,304

$
3,172

1997
12/23/2003
Canton, Ohio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
1,469

186

3,083

500

187

3,582

3,769

1,553

2,216

1994
1/30/2004
Akron, Ohio (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
—

1,973

6,771

2,793

1,974

9,563

11,537

3,287

8,250

1968/1999
4/29/2004
Charlotte, North Carolina
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
—

740

8,423

(1,752
)
510

6,901

7,411

3,417

3,994

1984/1995
6/30/2004
Canton, North Carolina
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
3,225

150

5,050

7,285

150

12,335

12,485

2,982

9,503

1998/2014
7/6/2004
Crenshaw, Pennsylvania (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

100

6,574

269

100

6,843

6,943

2,727

4,216

1991
8/5/2004
Lexington, North Carolina (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

820

2,107

69

820

2,176

2,996

899

2,097

1986
8/5/2004
Austin, Texas (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
—

1,000

6,296

954

1,000

7,250

8,250

2,661

5,589

2001
9/16/2004
Mt. Pocono, Pennsylvania (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

350

5,819

18

350

5,837

6,187

2,311

3,876

1995/1999
10/15/2004
San Antonio, Texas (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
—

843

7,514

2,240

843

9,754

10,597

3,614

6,983

1999
2/10/2005
Big Flats, New York
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
2,119

275

6,459

34

275

6,493

6,768

2,456

4,312

2001
4/15/2005
Wichita, Kansas (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
—

1,525

9,703

327

1,525

10,030

11,555

3,826

7,729

2000
5/18/2005
Eatontown, New Jersey
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
2,662

1,351

3,520

534

1,351

4,054

5,405

1,585

3,820

1991
7/7/2005
Duncan, South Carolina
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
8,637

783

10,790

1,889

783

12,679

13,462

4,588

8,874

1984/2001/2007
7/14/2005
Duncan, South Carolina
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
2,147

195

2,682

470

195

3,152

3,347

1,140

2,207

1984/2001/2007
7/14/2005
Clintonville, Wisconsin (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

55

4,717

3,250

55

7,967

8,022

2,440

5,582

1992/2013
10/31/2005
Maple Heights, Ohio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
4,000

1,609

10,065

3,079

1,609

13,144

14,753

5,235

9,518

1974
12/21/2005
Richmond, Virginia (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
—

736

5,336

457

736

5,793

6,529

2,022

4,507

1972
12/30/2005
Champaign, Illinois (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
—

687

2,036

(41
)
687

1,995

2,682

709

1,973

1996
2/21/2006
Champaign, Illinois (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
—

1,347

3,992

565

1,347

4,557

5,904

1,509

4,395

1996
2/21/2006
Champaign, Illinois (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
—

842

2,495

353

842

2,848

3,690

943

2,747

1996
2/21/2006
Champaign, Illinois (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
—

770

2,281

323

770

2,604

3,374

863

2,511

1996
2/21/2006
Burnsville, Minnesota
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
8,052

3,511

8,746

7,071

3,511

15,817

19,328

5,847

13,481

1984
5/10/2006
Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

625

6,911

686

625

7,597

8,222

2,665

5,557

1986/2000
6/30/2006
Baytown, Texas (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical Office Building
—

221

2,443

2,478

221

4,921

5,142

1,610

3,532

1997
7/11/2006
Mason, Ohio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
3,689

797

6,258

547

797

6,805

7,602

2,586

5,016

2002
1/5/2007
Raleigh, North Carolina (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

87

 
 
Initial Cost
 
Total Cost
 
 
 
 
Location of Property
Encumbrances
Land
Buildings &
Improvements
Improvement
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Land
Buildings &
Improvements
Total 
(1)
Accumulated
Depreciation (2)
Net Real
Estate (4)
Year
Construction/
Improvements
Date
Acquired
Industrial Building
—

1,606

5,513

3,749

1,606

9,262

10,868

3,103

7,765

1994
2/16/2007
Tulsa, Oklahoma
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

—

14,057

534

—

14,591

14,591

5,428

9,163

2004
3/1/2007
Hialeah, Florida (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

3,562

6,672

769

3,562

7,441

11,003

2,485

8,518

1956/1992
3/9/2007
Mason, Ohio (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Retail Building
—

1,201

4,961

—

1,201

4,961

6,162

1,619

4,543

2007
7/1/2007
Cicero, New York
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
3,263

299

5,019

—

299

5,019

5,318

1,586

3,732

2005
9/6/2007
Grand Rapids, Michigan
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
5,063

1,629

10,500

308

1,629

10,808

12,437

3,517

8,920

2001
9/28/2007
Bolingbrook, Illinois (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

1,272

5,003

856

1,272

5,859

7,131

2,049

5,082

2002
9/28/2007
Decatur, Georgia (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical Office Building
—

783

3,241

—

783

3,241

4,024

1,053

2,971

1989
12/13/2007
Decatur, Georgia (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical Office Building
—

205

847

—

205

847

1,052

275

777

1989
12/13/2007
Decatur, Georgia (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical Office Building
—

257

1,062

—

257

1,062

1,319

345

974

1989
12/13/2007
Lawrenceville, Georgia (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical Office Building
—

678

2,807

—

678

2,807

3,485

912

2,573

2005
12/13/2007
Snellville, Georgia (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical Office Building
—

176

727

—

176

727

903

236

667

1986
12/13/2007
Covington, Georgia (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical Office Building
—

232

959

—

232

959

1,191

312

879

2000
12/13/2007
Conyers, Georgia (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical Office Building
—

296

1,228

—

296

1,228

1,524

399

1,125

1994
12/13/2007
Cumming, Georgia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical Office Building
2,730

738

3,055

2,524

741

5,576

6,317

1,474

4,843

2004
12/13/2007
Reading, Pennsylvania
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
3,458

491

6,202

—

491

6,202

6,693

1,902

4,791

2007
1/29/2008
Fridley, Minnesota
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
4,523

1,354

8,074

501

1,383

8,546

9,929

3,082

6,847

1985/2006
2/26/2008
Pineville, North Carolina
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
2,010

669

3,028

293

669

3,321

3,990

988

3,002

1985
4/30/2008
Marietta, Ohio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
4,906

829

6,607

529

829

7,136

7,965

2,059

5,906

1992/2007
8/29/2008
Chalfont, Pennsylvania
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
4,420

1,249

6,420

362

1,249

6,782

8,031

2,186

5,845

1987
8/29/2008
Orange City, Iowa
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
6,068

258

5,861

6

258

5,867

6,125

1,660

4,465

1990
12/15/2010
Hickory, North Carolina
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
5,915

1,163

6,605

357

1,163

6,962

8,125

2,628

5,497

2008
4/4/2011
Springfield, Missouri (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
—

1,700

12,038

532

1,845

12,425

14,270

3,137

11,133

2006
6/20/2011
Boston Heights, Ohio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
2,337

449

3,010

11

449

3,021

3,470

1,100

2,370

2011
10/20/2011
Parsippany, New Jersey
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
5,967

1,696

7,077

252

1,696

7,329

9,025

2,217

6,808

1984
10/28/2011
Dartmouth, Massachusetts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Retail Location
3,450

—

4,236

—

—

4,236

4,236

960

3,276

2011
11/18/2011
Springfield, Missouri
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Retail Location
1,343

—

2,275

—

—

2,275

2,275

662

1,613

2005
12/13/2011
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
2,410

281

3,205

743

281

3,948

4,229

1,100

3,129

1968
12/28/2011
Ashburn, Virginia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
6,272

706

7,858

—

705

7,859

8,564

2,059

6,505

2002
1/25/2012
Ottumwa, Iowa
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
3,042

212

5,072

310

212

5,382

5,594

1,360

4,234

1970
5/30/2012
New Albany, Ohio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

88

 
 
Initial Cost
 
Total Cost
 
 
 
 
Location of Property
Encumbrances
Land
Buildings &
Improvements
Improvement
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Land
Buildings &
Improvements
Total 
(1)
Accumulated
Depreciation (2)
Net Real
Estate (4)
Year
Construction/
Improvements
Date
Acquired
Office Building
7,319

1,658

8,746

—

1,658

8,746

10,404

2,439

7,965

2007
6/5/2012
Columbus, Georgia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
3,927

1,378

4,520

—

1,378

4,520

5,898

1,405

4,493

2012
6/21/2012
Columbus, Ohio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
2,458

542

2,453

134

542

2,587

3,129

878

2,251

1981
6/28/2012
Jupiter, Florida (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
—

1,160

11,994

34

1,160

12,028

13,188

2,660

10,528

2011
9/26/2012
Fort Worth, Texas
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
11,076

963

15,647

—

963

15,647

16,610

3,405

13,205

2005
11/8/2012
Columbia, South Carolina
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
15,474

1,905

20,648

438

1,905

21,086

22,991

6,305

16,686

2010
11/21/2012
Egg Harbor, New Jersey
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
3,060

1,627

3,017

315

1,627

3,332

4,959

836

4,123

1985
3/28/2013
Vance, Alabama (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

457

10,529

6,692

457

17,221

17,678

2,900

14,778

2013
5/9/2013
Blaine, Minnesota
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
7,351

1,060

10,518

—

1,060

10,518

11,578

3,031

8,547

2009
5/10/2013
Austin, Texas
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
31,526

2,330

44,021

122

2,330

44,143

46,473

14,892

31,581

1999
7/9/2013
Allen, Texas
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
7,862

2,699

7,945

1,335

2,699

9,280

11,979

2,829

9,150

1998
7/10/2013
Englewood, Colorado
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
10,022

1,503

11,739

—

1,503

11,739

13,242

3,134

10,108

2008
12/11/2013
Novi, Michigan
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
3,815

352

5,626

—

352

5,626

5,978

1,170

4,808

1988
12/27/2013
Allen, Texas
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Retail Building
2,806

874

3,634

—

874

3,634

4,508

723

3,785

2004
3/27/2014
Colleyville, Texas
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Retail Building
2,591

1,277

2,424

—

1,277

2,424

3,701

525

3,176

2000
3/27/2014
Rancho Cordova, California
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
4,575

752

6,176

301

752

6,477

7,229

1,270

5,959

1986
4/22/2014
Coppell, Texas
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Retail Building
2,985

1,448

3,349

—

1,448

3,349

4,797

650

4,147

2005
5/8/2014
Columbus, Ohio (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
—

990

8,017

1,835

990

9,852

10,842

2,582

8,260

1986
5/13/2014
Taylor, Pennsylvania
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
21,600

3,101

25,405

—

3,101

25,405

28,506

4,477

24,029

2000/2006
6/9/2014
Aurora, Colorado (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

2,882

3,917

96

2,882

4,013

6,895

898

5,997

1983
7/1/2014
Indianapolis, Indiana
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
5,591

502

6,422

1,727

498

8,153

8,651

1,746

6,905

1981/2014
9/3/2014
Denver, Colorado (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

1,621

7,071

243

1,621

7,314

8,935

1,423

7,512

1985
10/31/2014
Monroe, Michigan
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
9,856

658

14,607

—

657

14,608

15,265

2,301

12,964

2004
12/23/2014
Monroe, Michigan
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
6,899

460

10,225

—

460

10,225

10,685

1,610

9,075

2004
12/23/2014
Richardson, Texas
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
13,296

2,728

15,372

643

2,728

16,015

18,743

3,349

15,394

1985/2008
3/6/2015
Birmingham, Alabama (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
—

650

2,034

60

650

2,094

2,744

477

2,267

1982/2010
3/20/2015
Dublin, Ohio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
3,951

1,338

5,058

886

1,338

5,944

7,282

1,118

6,164

1980/Various
5/28/2015
Draper, Utah
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
12,184

3,248

13,129

74

3,248

13,203

16,451

2,459

13,992

2008
5/29/2015
Hapeville, Georgia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
6,986

2,272

8,778

263

2,272

9,041

11,313

1,479

9,834

1999/2007
7/15/2015
Villa Rica, Georgia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
3,546

293

5,277

18

293

5,295

5,588

832

4,756

2000/2014
10/20/2015
Taylorsville, Utah
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

89

 
 
Initial Cost
 
Total Cost
 
 
 
 
Location of Property
Encumbrances
Land
Buildings &
Improvements
Improvement
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Land
Buildings &
Improvements
Total 
(1)
Accumulated
Depreciation (2)
Net Real
Estate (4)
Year
Construction/
Improvements
Date
Acquired
Office Building
9,112

3,008

10,659

435

3,008

11,094

14,102

2,108

11,994

1997
5/26/2016
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
13,026

4,117

15,516

2,932

4,117

18,448

22,565

2,735

19,830

1984
9/12/2016
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
14,612

3,681

15,739

—

3,681

15,739

19,420

2,182

17,238

2001
12/14/2016
Conshohocken, Pennsylvania
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
10,437

1,996

10,880

—

1,996

10,880

12,876

1,097

11,779

1996
6/22/2017
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
14,924

5,896

16,282

10

5,906

16,282

22,188

1,903

20,285

1994/2011
7/7/2017
Maitland, Florida
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
15,789

3,073

19,661

431

3,091

20,074

23,165

2,615

20,550

1998
7/31/2017
Maitland, Florida
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
7,916

2,095

9,339

—

2,095

9,339

11,434

940

10,494

1999
7/31/2017
Columbus, Ohio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
9,114

1,926

11,410

(1
)
1,925

11,410

13,335

1,235

12,100

2007
12/1/2017
Salt Lake City, Utah (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
—

4,446

9,938

771

4,446

10,709

15,155

1,021

14,134

2007
12/1/2017
Vance, Alabama (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

459

12,224

36

469

12,250

12,719

811

11,908

2018
3/9/2018
Columbus, Ohio
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
4,634

681

6,401

—

681

6,401

7,082

424

6,658

1990
9/20/2018
Detroit, Michigan
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
6,660

1,458

10,092

10

1,468

10,092

11,560

428

11,132

1997
10/30/2018
Detroit, Michigan (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

662

6,681

10

672

6,681

7,353

288

7,065

2002/2016
10/30/2018
Lake Mary, Florida
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office Building
10,502

3,018

11,756

2

3,020

11,756

14,776

514

14,262

1997/2018
12/27/2018
Moorestown, New Jersey (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

471

1,825

—

471

1,825

2,296

101

2,195

1991
2/8/2019
Indianapolis, Indiana (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

255

2,809

—

255

2,809

3,064

92

2,972

1989/2019
2/28/2019
Ocala, Florida (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

1,286

8,535

—

1,286

8,535

9,821

214

9,607

2001
4/5/2019
Ocala, Florida (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

725

4,814

—

725

4,814

5,539

121

5,418

1965/2007
4/5/2019
Delaware, Ohio (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

316

2,355

—

316

2,355

2,671

66

2,605

2005
4/30/2019
Tifton, Georgia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
8,753

—

15,190

—

—

15,190

15,190

274

14,916

1995/2003
6/18/2019
Denton, Texas (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

1,497

4,151

—

1,496

4,152

5,648

78

5,570

2012
7/30/2019
Temple, Texas (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

200

4,335

65

200

4,400

4,600

47

4,553

1973/2006
9/26/2019
Temple, Texas (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

296

6,425

98

296

6,523

6,819

70

6,749

1978/2006
9/26/2019
Indianapolis, Indiana (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
—

1,158

5,162

—

1,158

5,162

6,320

41

6,279

1967/1998
11/14/2019
Jackson, Tennessee
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
4,770

311

7,199

—

311

7,199

7,510

10

7,500

2019
12/16/2019
Carrollton, Georgia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
4,240

291

6,720

—

292

6,719

7,011

9

7,002

2015/2019
12/17/2019
New Orleans, Louisiana
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
3,800

2,168

4,667

—

2,168

4,667

6,835

10

6,825

1975
12/17/2019
San Antonio, Texas
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
3,900

775

6,877

—

775

6,877

7,652

10

7,642

1985
12/17/2019
Port Allen, Louisiana
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
2,890

292

3,411

—

293

3,410

3,703

6

3,697

1983/2005
12/17/2019
Albuquerque, New Mexico
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
1,870

673

2,291

—

674

2,290

2,964

4

2,960

1998/2017
12/17/2019
Tucson, Arizona
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

90

 
 
Initial Cost
 
Total Cost
 
 
 
 
Location of Property
Encumbrances
Land
Buildings &
Improvements
Improvement
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Land
Buildings &
Improvements
Total 
(1)
Accumulated
Depreciation (2)
Net Real
Estate (4)
Year
Construction/
Improvements
Date
Acquired
Industrial Building
3,500

819

4,636

—

819

4,636

5,455

7

5,448

1987/1995/2005
12/17/2019
Albuquerque, New Mexico
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Building
3,540

818

5,219

—

819

5,218

6,037

8

6,029

2000/2018
12/17/2019
 
$
457,922

$
138,037

$
859,268

$
67,084

$
138,042

$
926,347

$
1,064,389

$
210,944

$
853,445

 
 
(1)
The aggregate cost for land and building improvements for federal income tax purposes is the same as the total gross cost of land, building improvements and acquisition costs capitalized for asset acquisitions under ASC 360, which is $1,064.4 million.
(2)
Depreciable life of all buildings is the shorter of the useful life of the asset or 39 years. Depreciable life of all improvements is the shorter of the useful life of the assets or the life of the respective leases on each building, which range from 5-20 years.
(3)
These properties are in our unencumbered pool of assets on our Credit Facility.
(4)
The net real estate figure includes real estate held for sale as of December 31, 2019 of $4.0 million.

The following table reconciles the change in the balance of real estate during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively (in thousands):
 
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
949,822

 
$
906,850

 
$
833,203

 
Additions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisitions during period
 
108,972

 
53,432

 
100,103

 
Improvements
 
10,580

 
4,824

 
10,473

 
Deductions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dispositions during period
 
(3,172
)
 
(15,284
)
 
(30,094
)
 
Impairments during period
 
(1,813
)
 
—

 
(6,835
)

Balance at end of period
 
$
1,064,389

(1)
$
949,822

(2)
$
906,850

(3)
 
(1)
The real estate figure includes $7.4 million of real estate held for sale as of December 31, 2019.
(2)
The real estate figure includes $3.2 million of real estate held for sale as of December 31, 2018.
(3)
The real estate figure includes $13.0 million of real estate held for sale as of December 31, 2017.

The following table reconciles the change in the balance of accumulated depreciation during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively (in thousands):
 
 
 
2019
 
2018
 
2017
 
Balance at beginning of period
 
$
178,475

 
$
153,387

 
$
134,329

 
Additions during period
 
32,838

 
29,915

 
26,927

 
Dispositions during period
 
(369
)
 
(4,827
)
 
(7,869
)
 
Balance at end of period
 
$
210,944

(1)
$
178,475

(2)
$
153,387

(3)
 
(1)
The accumulated depreciation figure includes $3.4 million of real estate held for sale as of December 31, 2019.
(2)
The accumulated depreciation figure includes $0.2 million of real estate held for sale as of December 31, 2018.
(3)
The accumulated depreciation figure includes $4.0 million real estate held for sale as of December 31, 2017.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.


91

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of December 31, 2019, our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2019 in providing a reasonable level of assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable SEC rules and forms, including providing a reasonable level of assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. However, in evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance of necessarily achieving the desired control objectives, and management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Refer to Management’s Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting located in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

c) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

Refer to the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm located in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

d) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

PART III

We will file a definitive Proxy Statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2020 Proxy Statement”) with the SEC, pursuant to Regulation 14A, not later than 120 days after December 31, 2019. Accordingly, certain information required by Part III has been omitted under General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K. Only those sections of the 2020 Proxy Statement that specifically address the items set forth herein are incorporated by reference.

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The information required by Item 10 is hereby incorporated by reference from our 2020 Proxy Statement under the captions “Election of Directors to Class of 2023,” “Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance,” “Compensation Committee Report,” “Executive Officers,” and “Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports,” and sub-caption “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.”

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The information required by Item 11 is hereby incorporated by reference from our 2020 Proxy Statement under the captions “Executive Compensation,” “Director Compensation,” and “Compensation Committee Report,” and sub-caption “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation.”

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The information required by Item 12 is hereby incorporated by reference from our 2020 Proxy Statement under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.”


92

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information required by Item 13 is hereby incorporated by reference from our 2020 Proxy Statement under the captions “Transactions with Related Persons” and “Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance.”

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

The information required by Item 14 is hereby incorporated by reference from our 2020 Proxy Statement under the sub-captions “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees” and “Pre-Approval Policy and Procedures” under the caption “Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
 
a.
DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT
 
1
The following financial statements are filed herewith:

Report of Management on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
2
Financial statement schedules

Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation is filed herewith.
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, or because the required information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
 
3
Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or hereby incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed with the SEC:

Exhibit Index
 

93

3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.8
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6

10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7

94

10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
21
23
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
100
The following materials from the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


 


95

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

Not applicable.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
Date:
 
February 12, 2020
 
 
 
By:
 
/s/ Michael Sodo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Michael Sodo
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
Date:
 
February 12, 2020
 
 
 
By:
 
/s/ David Gladstone
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
David Gladstone
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chief Executive Officer and
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chairman of the Board of Directors

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


96

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
February 12, 2020
By:
 
/s/ David Gladstone
 
 
 
 
 
David Gladstone
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors (principal executive officer)
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
February 12, 2020
By:
 
/s/ Terry Lee Brubaker
 
 
 
 
 
Terry Lee Brubaker
Vice Chairman, Chief Operating Officer and Director
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
February 12, 2020
By:
 
/s/ Michael Sodo
 
 
 
 
 
Michael Sodo
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
February 12, 2020
By:
 
/s/ Anthony W. Parker
 
 
 
 
 
Anthony W. Parker
Director
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
February 12, 2020
By:
 
/s/ Michela A. English
 
 
 
 
 
Michela A. English
Director
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
February 12, 2020
By:
 
/s/ Paul Adelgren
 
 
 
 
 
Paul Adelgren
Director
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
February 12, 2020
By:
 
/s/ John Outland
 
 
 
 
 
John Outland
Director
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
February 12, 2020
By:
 
/s/ Walter H. Wilkinson, Jr.
 
 
 
 
 
Walter H. Wilkinson, Jr.
Director
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
February 12, 2020
By:
 
/s/ Caren D. Merrick
 
 
 
 
 
Caren D. Merrick
Director


97