-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, Lm+VPGFAgjfeCoPer870XNvcwwwskyRTvM5GHaZqZjOwXBwhlplNUoWhB+xiYRHm 2G59Qran6NbN7xpkVF2/vg== 0000950134-05-005237.txt : 20050316 0000950134-05-005237.hdr.sgml : 20050316 20050316161836 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950134-05-005237 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 12 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20041231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20050316 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20050316 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001232582 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS [6798] IRS NUMBER: 861062192 STATE OF INCORPORATION: MD FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-31775 FILM NUMBER: 05685726 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 14180 DALLAS PARKWAY 9TH FL CITY: DALLAS STATE: TX ZIP: 75254 BUSINESS PHONE: 9724909600 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 14180 DALLAS PARKWAY 9TH FL CITY: DALLAS STATE: TX ZIP: 75254 10-K 1 d23137e10vk.htm FORM 10-K e10vk
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
     
(Mark One)    
þ
  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
    FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
 
OR
 
o
  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
    FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM           TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 001-31775
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Maryland
  86-1062192
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
14185 Dallas Parkway,
Suite 1100, Dallas, TEXAS
(Address of principal executive offices)
  75254
(Zip Code)
(972) 490-9600
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR
PREFERRED STOCK, SERIES A, $0.01 PAR
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
NONE
      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (i) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (ii) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ          No o
      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     o
      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     Yes þ          No o
      The aggregate market value of the common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the price at which the registrant’s common stock was last sold on the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $202.8 million. As of March 15, 2005, the registrant had issued and outstanding 36,160,447 shares of common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
      The Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement pertaining to the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”), filed or to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A, is incorporated herein by reference into Part III.
 
 


FORM 10-K INDEX
             
        Page
         
 PART I
   Business     4  
   Properties     31  
   Legal Proceedings     32  
   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders     32  
 
 PART II
   Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters     32  
   Selected Financial Data     34  
   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     37  
   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk     52  
   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data     53  
   Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure     53  
   Controls and Procedures     53  
 
 PART III
   Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant     54  
   Executive Compensation     54  
   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters     54  
   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions     54  
   Principal Accountant Fees and Services     54  
 
 PART IV
   Financial Statement Schedules and Exhibits     54  
     Index to Consolidated Financial Statements     60  
 Purchase and Sale Agreement
 Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement
 Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement
 Registrants Subsidiaries Listing
 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
 Certification of CEO
 Certification of CFO
 Certification of Chief Accounting Officer
 Certification of CEO
 Certification of CFO
 Certification of Chief Accounting Officer

2


Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
      We make forward-looking statements throughout this Form 10-K and documents incorporated herein by reference that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans, and objectives. Statements regarding the following subjects are forward-looking by their nature:
  •  our business and investment strategy;
 
  •  our projected operating results;
 
  •  completion of any pending transactions;
 
  •  our ability to obtain future financing arrangements;
 
  •  our understanding of our competition;
 
  •  market trends;
 
  •  projected capital expenditures; and
 
  •  the impact of technology on our operations and business.
      Such forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions, and expectations of our future performance taking into account all information currently available to us. These beliefs, assumptions, and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans, and objectives may vary materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. Additionally, the following factors could cause actual results to vary from our forward-looking statements:
  •  the factors discussed in this Form 10-K, including those set forth under the sections titled “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Business,” and “Properties;”
 
  •  general volatility of the capital markets and the market price of our common stock;
 
  •  changes in our business or investment strategy;
 
  •  availability, terms, and deployment of capital;
 
  •  availability of qualified personnel;
 
  •  changes in our industry and the market in which we operate, interest rates, or the general economy; and
 
  •  the degree and nature of our competition.
      When we use the words “will likely result,” “may,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” or similar expressions, we intend to identify forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We are not obligated to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

3


Table of Contents

PART I
Item 1. Business
Our Company
      Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company” or “we” or “our”) is a self-advised real estate investment trust (“REIT”), which commenced operations on August 29, 2003 when it completed its initial public offering (“IPO”). We own our lodging investments and conduct our business through Ashford Hospitality Limited Partnership, our operating partnership. Ashford OP General Partner LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, serves as the sole general partner of our operating partnership.
      We have elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for federal income tax purposes. Because of limitations imposed on REITs in operating hotel properties, third-party managers manage each of our hotel properties. Remington Lodging & Hospitality, L.P., or Remington Lodging, is our primary property manager, managing 14 of our 33 existing hotel properties, as well as all of the 21 hotel properties in the portfolio acquired in March 2005. Our remaining 19 hotel properties are managed by management companies unaffiliated with us. Remington Lodging is wholly owned by Mr. Archie Bennett, our Chairman, and Mr. Montgomery J. Bennett, our President and Chief Executive Officer.
      During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company completed the following transactions:
  •  On March 15, 2004, the Company issued 70,400 shares of restricted common stock to its executives and certain employees.
 
  •  On April 1, 2004, the Company issued 106,675 units of limited partnership interest in connection with the acquisition of a hotel property.
 
  •  On May 19, 2004, the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock to its directors as compensation for serving on the Board through May 2005.
 
  •  On September 2, 2004, the Company issued 333,333 units of limited partnership interest in connection with the acquisition of nine hotel properties.
 
  •  On September 22, 2004, the Company issued 2,300,000 shares of Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock in a public offering of such preferred shares.
 
  •  On December 30, 2004, the Company issued 993,049 shares of Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock to a financial institution.
      As of December 31, 2004, the Company owned 33 hotel properties in fourteen states with 5,095 rooms, and had acquired or originated mezzanine or first-mortgage loans receivable with a balance at December 31, 2004 of approximately $79.7 million.
      We maintain a website at www.ahtreit.com. On our website, we make available free-of-charge all our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form  10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and other reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and Board Committee Charters are also available free-of-charge on our website or can be made available in print upon request.
      All reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission may also be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. Further information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, all of our filed reports can be obtained at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

4


Table of Contents

Our Business Strategy
      Our current investment strategy is to target specific opportunities created by the current strengthening lodging market, while retaining the flexibility to invest in the most attractive risk-reward opportunities as they develop in the lodging business cycle. We believe that the U.S. economy is currently in an expansion phase and that the underlying cash flows of hotels will continue to improve due to favorable supply/demand dynamics. We believe that our current investment policies, particularly our current focus on the upscale and upper-upscale lodging segments, will allow us to participate in the continued improvement in performance within the lodging industry. However, we also believe that as supply, demand, and capital market cycles change, we will be able to shift our investment strategies to take advantage of newly-created lodging investment opportunities as they develop. Currently, we do not limit our acquisitions to any specific geographical market. While our current investment strategies are well defined, our board of directors may change our investment policies at any time without stockholder approval.
      We intend to continue to invest in a variety of lodging-related assets based upon our evaluation of diverse market conditions. These investments may include: (i) direct hotel investments; (ii) mezzanine financing through origination or through acquisition in secondary markets; (iii) first lien mortgage financing through origination or through acquisition in secondary markets; and (iv) sale-leaseback transactions.
      Our strategy is designed to take advantage of current lodging industry conditions and adjust to changes in market conditions over time. In the current market, we believe we can continue to purchase assets at discounts to previous trading ranges or replacement costs and acquire or originate debt positions with attractive relative yields. Over time, our assessment of market conditions will determine asset reallocation strategies. While we seek to capitalize on favorable market fundamentals, conditions beyond our control may have an impact on overall profitability and on the investment returns.
      Our business strategy of combining lodging-related equity and debt investments seeks, among other things, to:
  •  capitalize on both current yield and appreciation, while simultaneously offering diversification of types of assets within the hospitality industry;
 
  •  vary investments across an array of hospitality assets to take advantage of market cycles for each asset class; and
 
  •  offer an attractive liquidity alternative to asset sales (through structure and tax deferral) and traditional financing (due to rate, structure, loan-to-value, and asset class).
      Our investment strategy primarily targets limited and full service hotels in primary, secondary, and resort markets throughout the United States. To take full advantage of current and future investment opportunities in the lodging industry, we will invest according to the asset allocation strategies described below. Due to ongoing changes in market conditions, we will continually evaluate the appropriateness of our investment strategies. Our board of directors may change any or all of these strategies at any time.
      Direct Hotel Investments — In selecting the hotels that we have acquired since our initial public offering, we have targeted hotels that either offer a high current return or have the opportunity to increase in value through repositioning, capital investments, market-based recovery, or improved management practices. We intend to continue to acquire existing hotels and, under appropriate market conditions, may develop new hotels. Our direct hotel acquisition strategy will follow similar investment criteria and will seek to achieve both current income and income from appreciation.
      Mezzanine Financing — The subordinated loans, also known as mezzanine loans, we have acquired or originated since our initial public offering relate to upscale or full-service hotels that we believe require no significant near-term capital expenditures, have reputable managers, and are located in good or emerging sub-markets. We intend to continue to acquire or originate mezzanine loans. Each of our mezzanine loans is secured by junior mortgages on hotels or pledges of equity interests in entities owning hotels and, in one instance, by a junior participation in a first mortgage. Mezzanine loans that we acquire in the future may be secured by individual assets as well as cross-collateralized portfolios of assets. Although these types of loans

5


Table of Contents

generally have greater repayment risks than first mortgages due to the subordinated nature of the loans, we have a disciplined approach in underwriting the value of the asset. We expect this asset class to provide us with attractive returns and potentially allow us to participate in the improving economics of the underlying hotel. In addition, subject to restrictions applicable to REITs, we may acquire or originate corporate-level mezzanine loans on an unsecured basis.
      First Mortgage Financing — We have originated one first mortgage which was subsequently sold and one junior participation in a first mortgage, which we refer to as a mezzanine loan. As interest rates increase and the dynamics in the hotel industry make first-mortgage investments more attractive, we intend to acquire, potentially at a discount to par, or originate loans secured by first priority mortgages on hotels. We may be subject to certain state-imposed licensing regulations related to commercial mortgage lenders, with which we intend to comply. However, because we are not a bank or a federally chartered lending institution, we are not subject to the state and federal regulatory constraints imposed on such entities. Also, because we do not intend to securitize our assets, we expect we will be able to offer more flexible terms than commercial lenders who contribute loans to securitized mortgage pools. We anticipate that this asset class will provide us with stable, attractive current yields.
      Sale-Leaseback Transactions — To date, we have not participated in any sale-leaseback transactions. However, if the lodging industry fundamentals shift such that sale-leaseback transactions become more attractive investments, we intend to purchase hotels and lease them back to their existing hotel owners.
Our Operating Procedures
      In implementing our business strategy through investments that satisfy the applicable investment policies described above, we consider each of the following:
      Asset Review. In making future hotel investment decisions, we consider several criteria, including:
  •  Number of Rooms — We anticipate acquiring or investing in hotels with at least 70 rooms.
 
  •  Ownership Structure — We prefer properties with a fee simple title.
 
  •  Franchise Affiliations — We consider both major franchises as well as independents.
 
  •  Competition — We intend to seek properties in areas that lack a substantial new supply of hotel rooms, appear resilient to down markets, and either have an existing broad demand or a growing demand base.
 
  •  Physical Condition — The condition of the property that is acceptable to us will depend on the pricing structure. Major product improvement plans or renovations are acceptable if the pricing adequately reflects such renovations.
 
  •  Available Financing — To the extent we utilize financing in our investments, we will seek non-recourse financing.
 
  •  Amenities — We prefer properties that have amenities (food and beverage, meeting space, fitness equipment, parking, etc.) consistent with the needs of its targeted customer.
 
  •  Operating Performance — We intend to seek hotels that have shown a solid operating performance or alternatively seek assets where strategic changes in operations or its market positioning will generate improved revenue and operating margins.
 
  •  Room Demand Generators — We will seek hotels that have a diversified base of room demand generators or alternatively seek to reposition hotels to capitalize on shifting the hotel’s guest mix in ways to improve operating performance.
      However, none of these criteria alone is considered determinative.
      Underwriting Review. After we identify a potential investment, a due diligence team, consisting of in-house and third parties, will conduct detailed due diligence to assess the potential investment. This due

6


Table of Contents

diligence team will follow underwriting guidelines and review a list of property-level issues, including but not limited to:
  •  property financials;
 
  •  property condition;
 
  •  environmental issues;
 
  •  ADA compliance;
 
  •  title surveys;
 
  •  competitive position;
 
  •  brand;
 
  •  market assessment;
 
  •  advance-booking reports; and
 
  •  marketing plans.
      Market Assessments. Our market assessment analysis entails in-depth evaluation of macro and micro market forces affecting the lodging industry in a given market and the specific sub-market. We usually process data obtained from numerous industry sources that focus on new supply, changes in demand patterns, brand expansion plans, performance of key corporations, government initiatives, and essential hotel performance data (e.g., average daily rate (“ADR”), occupancy, and net revenue per available room (“RevPAR”)). We analyze this information to make near-term and long-term investment and sales decisions within each market and further within specific sub-markets.
      Capital Markets Evaluation. We monitor the capital markets to determine trends in lodging investment patterns and debt-to-equity pricing. We typically maintain a debt and equity transaction database encompassing recently closed transactions and suggested pricing for new transactions. This information assists us in the formulation of competitive pricing trends and may serve as a good indicator of when liquidity gaps or pricing inefficiencies may exist in the market. We use this pricing knowledge to optimally allocate our assets across our four targeted lodging-related investment classes to maximize our risk-adjusted returns.
      Value-Optimization Strategies. We regularly evaluate the incremental performance and resulting investment actions for each asset in our portfolio as part of our budget review process. Due to our fluid asset allocation strategy, it is imperative that the relative merits of holding a particular property or investment demonstrate benefits in terms of accretion and portfolio diversification. Our objective in such an evaluation is to confirm that an existing asset adds to stockholder value. The methodology consists of a “re-buy” analysis that determines if continuing to hold a particular investment, using forward-looking market growth assumptions, is a valid strategy. By consistently applying this policy across all investments, we seek to maximize our investment returns by reallocating funds into more productive asset classes.
Our Operating Segments
      As addressed in Item 15, Financial Statements Schedules, we currently operate in two business segments within the hotel lodging industry: direct hotel investments and hotel financing. These operating segments are described above along with additional operating segments where we anticipate future participation.

7


Table of Contents

Our Financing Strategy
      We utilize our borrowing power to leverage future investments. When evaluating our future level of indebtedness and when making decisions regarding the incurrence of indebtedness, our board of directors considers a number of factors, including:
  •  the purchase price of our investments to be acquired with debt financing;
 
  •  the estimated market value of our investments upon refinancing; and
 
  •  the ability of particular investments, and our Company as a whole, to generate cash flow to cover expected debt service.
      We may incur debt in the form of purchase money obligations to the sellers of properties, or in the form of publicly or privately placed debt instruments or financing from banks, institutional investors, or other lenders. Any such indebtedness may be unsecured or secured by mortgages or other interests in our properties or mortgage loans. This indebtedness may be recourse, non-recourse, or cross-collateralized. If recourse, that recourse may include our general assets, and if non-recourse, such recourse may be limited to the particular investment to which the indebtedness relates. In addition, we may invest in properties or loans subject to existing loans secured by mortgages or similar liens on the properties, or may refinance properties acquired on a leveraged basis. We may use the proceeds from any borrowings for working capital to:
  •  purchase additional interests in partnerships or joint ventures in which we participate;
 
  •  refinance existing indebtedness;
 
  •  finance the origination or purchase of mortgage investments; or
 
  •  finance acquisitions, expansion, or redevelopment of existing properties or development of new properties.
      We may also incur indebtedness for other purposes when, in the opinion of our board of directors, it is advisable for us to do so. In addition, we may need to borrow to meet the taxable income distribution requirements under the Internal Revenue Code if we do not have sufficient cash available to meet those distribution requirements.
      No assurances can be given that we will obtain additional financings or, if we do, what the amount and terms will be. Our failure to obtain future financing under favorable terms could adversely impact our ability to execute on our business strategy. In addition, we may selectively pursue mortgage financing on individual properties and our mortgage investments.
Our Distribution Policy
      To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we intend to make annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our taxable income (which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles). Distributions are authorized by our board of directors and declared by us based upon a variety of factors deemed relevant by our directors, and no assurance can be given that our dividend policy will not change in the future. Our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders will depend, in part, upon our receipt of distributions from our operating partnership, which may depend upon receipt of lease payments with respect to our properties from the indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership, Ashford TRS, and, in turn, upon the management of our properties by our property managers. Distributions to our stockholders are generally taxable to our stockholders as ordinary income. However, since a portion of our investments are equity ownership interests in hotels, which result in depreciation and non-cash charges against our income, a portion of our distributions may constitute a tax-free return of capital. To the extent that it’s not inconsistent with maintaining our REIT status, we may maintain accumulated earnings of Ashford TRS in that entity.
      Our charter allows us to issue preferred stock with a preference on distributions, which we did in 2004. The partnership agreement of our operating partnership also allows the operating partnership to issue units

8


Table of Contents

with a preference on distribution. Such issuance of preferred stock or preferred units, given the dividend preference on this stock or units, could limit our ability to make a dividend distribution to our common stockholders.
Our Recent Developments
      During the year ended December 31, 2004, we completed the following significant transactions:
      On January 23, 2004, we acquired a $15.0 million subordinated first-mortgage loan receivable related to a hotel property in Denver, Colorado. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 9%, matures in January 2006, and provides for three one-year extension options subject to certain conditions. In accordance with the loan agreement, we will receive interest-only payments through maturity, with principal and interest paid through the extension periods based on a twenty-five-year amortization schedule. Prepayments of the loan require decreasing prepayment premiums through August 31, 2005, and require no prepayment premiums thereafter. We used proceeds from our IPO as well as proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
      On February 5, 2004, we executed a $60.0 million secured credit facility, at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.25%, of which approximately $49.8 million of the proceeds were funded March 24, 2004 and the remainder was funded May 17, 2004. The credit facility matures in three years, was initially collateralized by eight hotel properties, is subject to certain financial covenants, requires a commitment fee of 0.45% to 0.55% on the unused portion of the line, which is payable quarterly, and allows for an increase to $75.0 million subject to certain conditions of the lender. On August 17, 2004, we modified the terms of this credit facility, as discussed below.
      On March 4, 2004, we acquired a $25.0 million mezzanine loan receivable secured by 17 hotel properties. The mezzanine loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 8.7% with a 2.5% LIBOR floor, matures in July 2005, and provides for three one-year extension options subject to certain conditions. In accordance with the loan agreement, we will receive principal and interest payments through the extension periods based on a twenty-five-year amortization schedule. Prepayments of the loan are prohibited through maturity subject to certain provisions. We used proceeds from our IPO as well as proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition. Prior to December 31, 2004, we received payments of approximately $8.1 million related to the portion of this mezzanine loan that was secured by three hotel properties. As a result, the $25.0 million mezzanine loan, originally secured by 17 hotel properties, became a $16.9 million mezzanine loan, secured by 14 hotel properties.
      On March 15, 2004, we declared a cash dividend of approximately $1.9 million, or $0.06 per diluted share, for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on March 31, 2004, which was paid April 15, 2004.
      On March 19, 2004, we originated a $15.0 million mezzanine loan receivable related to a hotel property in Boston, Massachusetts. The mezzanine loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 10.25% with a 1.75% LIBOR floor and a 5% LIBOR cap, matures in March 2007, and provides for two one-year extension options subject to certain conditions. In accordance with the loan agreement, we will receive interest-only payments through maturity. Prepayments of the loan are prohibited through September 1, 2005. We used proceeds from our IPO as well as proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
      On March 24, 2004, we acquired a $6.6 million mezzanine loan receivable related to a hotel property in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. The mezzanine loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 10% with a 2% LIBOR floor and a 5% LIBOR cap and matures in January 2006. In accordance with the loan agreement, we will receive interest-only payments through maturity. In addition, we will receive an additional interest payment upon maturity based on an accrual rate of the greater of 15% or LIBOR plus 13% with a 2% LIBOR floor. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
      On March 24, 2004, we acquired a hotel property in Lake Buena Vista, Florida, from JHM Ruby Lake Hotel, Ltd. for approximately $25.6 million in cash. Annualized revenue of the acquired hotel is approximately $5.8 million. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.

9


Table of Contents

      On April 1, 2004, we acquired a hotel property in Atlantic Beach, Florida, from Huron Jacksonville Limited Partnership for approximately $23.1 million, which consisted of approximately $6.3 million in cash, approximately $15.7 million in assumed mortgage debt, and approximately $1.1 million worth of limited partnership units, which equates to 106,675 units based on the market price of our common stock on the date of issuance. Annualized revenue of the acquired hotel is approximately $9.1 million. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
      On May 17, 2004, we acquired a hotel property in Baltimore, Maryland, from The Buccini/ Pollin Group for approximately $15.9 million, which included approximately $9.1 million in cash and approximately $6.8 million in assumed mortgage debt, which matures April 1, 2011. On August 12, 2004, we increased this debt commitment by approximately $5.2 million and reduced the overall interest rate from the average weekly yield for 30-day commercial paper plus 3.5% to the average weekly yield for 30-day commercial paper plus 3.4%. Annualized revenue of the acquired hotel is approximately $3.9 million. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
      On June 16, 2004, we declared a cash dividend of approximately $3.2 million, or $0.10 per diluted share, for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on June 30, 2004, which was paid July 15, 2004.
      On July 7, 2004, we acquired a hotel property and adjacent office building in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from Household OPEB I, Inc. for approximately $16.7 million in cash. Annualized revenue of the acquired hotel is approximately $9.0 million, while the adjacent office building has one tenant with nominal operations. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
      On July 7, 2004, we executed a $14.8 million mortgage note payable, secured by one hotel property, at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.5%, with a 5% total floor. The mortgage note payable had a maturity date of July 31, 2007 with two one-year extension options, with interest-only payments due monthly plus principal payments of $20,000 due monthly beginning July 1, 2006. Upon completion of the $210.0 million term loan on September 2, 2004, as discussed below, this mortgage note payable was repaid. The balance outstanding at the time the loan was repaid was approximately $9.7 million.
      On July 14, 2004, we executed a $45.6 million credit facility, with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 6.25% with a 2% LIBOR floor, which matures July 13, 2007. Approximately $37.5 million of the proceeds were funded immediately. Prior to December 31, 2004, we paid down approximately $5.1 million of this credit facility in connection with partial payoffs of one of the mezzanine notes receivable securing the facility.
      On July 23, 2004, we acquired four hotel properties from Day Hospitality Group for approximately $25.9 million in cash plus approximately $86,000 in additional cash to be paid no later than April 30, 2005 pursuant to a post-acquisition contingency. Annualized revenues of these four hotel properties are approximately $7.8 million. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund the acquisition of these properties.
      On July 23, 2004, we executed a $19.6 million mortgage note payable, with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.5% with a 5% total floor, which matures July 31, 2007. Upon completion of the $210.0 million term loan on September 2, 2004, as discussed below, this mortgage note payable was paid down by approximately $12.6 million.
      On August 17, 2004, we modified our $60.0 million credit facility such that the interest rate was reduced from LIBOR plus 3.25% to LIBOR plus a range of 2.0% to 2.3% depending on the loan-to-value ratio, and maturity was extended from February 5, 2007 to August 17, 2007, with two one-year extension options.
      On August 20, 2004, we received an approximate $7.2 million payment related to the portion of our $25.0 million mezzanine loan that was secured by two hotel properties. As a result of this prepayment, the $25.0 million mezzanine loan, originally secured by 17 hotel properties, became a $17.8 million mezzanine loan, secured by 15 hotel properties.
      On September 2, 2004, we executed a $210.0 million term loan, at varying interest rates averaging LIBOR plus 1.95%, with interest-only payments due monthly. We used the proceeds to repay three mortgage notes payable totaling approximately $57.8 million (with interest rates ranging from LIBOR plus 3.25% to

10


Table of Contents

LIBOR plus 3.5%), pay down our $60.0 million secured credit facility (interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.25%) by approximately $57.2 million, and pay down another mortgage note payable by approximately $12.6 million (interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.5%).
      On September 2, 2004, we acquired nine hotel properties from Dunn Hospitality Group for approximately $62.0 million, which consisted of approximately $59.0 million in cash and approximately $3.0 million worth of limited partnership units, which equates to 333,333 units based on the market price of our common stock on the date of issuance. Annualized revenues of these nine hotel properties are approximately $20.1 million. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund the acquisition of these properties.
      On September 10, 2004, we acquired an $11.0 million mezzanine loan receivable related to a hotel property in Westminster, Colorado. The mezzanine loan bears interest at 14% and matures in September 2011. In accordance with the loan agreement, we will receive interest-only payments through maturity. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
      On September 13, 2004, we declared a cash dividend of approximately $4.5 million, or $0.14 per diluted share, for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on September 30, 2004, which was paid October 15, 2004.
      On September 22, 2004, we issued 2,300,000 shares of 8.55% Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock at $25 per share, which generated gross proceeds of approximately $57.5 million. However, our aggregate proceeds, net of underwriters’ discount and offering costs, was approximately $55.0 million.
      On September 30, 2004, we originated a $10.0 million first-mortgage loan receivable related to a hotel property in Denver, Colorado, which bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.8%. Also on September 30, 2004, we originated a $5.0 million mezzanine loan receivable related to the same hotel property in Denver, Colorado, which bears interest at LIBOR plus 11.35%. Both loans mature October 2006. In accordance with the loan agreements, we will receive interest-only payments through maturity. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund these originations.
      On October 1, 2004, we acquired the Hyatt Orange County hotel in Anaheim, California, from Atrium Plaza, LLC for approximately $81.0 million in cash, inclusive of the seller’s commitment to fund a $6.0 million renovation, which was completed in December 2004. Annualized revenue of the acquired hotel is approximately $27.8 million. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
      On October 1, 2004, in connection with the acquisition of a hotel property, we drew an additional $15.0 million on our $60.0 million credit facility.
      On December 9, 2004, we sold our $10 million first-mortgage loan receivable, secured by one hotel property, with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.8%, maturing in October 2006, at its par value.
      On December 15, 2004, we declared a cash dividend of approximately $4.8 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on December 31, 2004, which was paid January 18, 2005.
      On December 17, 2004, we declared a cash dividend of approximately $1.4 million, or $0.5878 per diluted share, for Series A preferred shareholders of record on December 31, 2004, which was paid January 18, 2005.
      On December 30, 2004, we issued 993,049 shares of Series B-1 Preferred Stock at $10.07 per share, which generated proceeds of approximately $10.0 million.
Our Competition
      The hotel industry is highly competitive. Each of our hotels is located in a developed area that includes other hotel properties. Accordingly, our hotels compete for guests with other full-service or limited-service hotels in the immediate vicinity and, secondarily, with hotels in its geographic market. The future occupancy, ADR, and RevPAR of any hotel could be materially and adversely affected by an increase in the number or quality of the competitive hotel properties in its market area. We believe that brand recognition, location,

11


Table of Contents

quality of the hotel and the services provided, and price are the principal competitive factors affecting our hotels.
Our Employees
      At December 31, 2004, we had 27 full-time employees. The employees perform directly or through our operating partnership various acquisition, development, redevelopment, and corporate management functions. All persons employed in the day-to-day operation of our hotels are employees of the management companies engaged by our lessees, and are not our employees.
Environmental Matters
      Under various federal, state, and local laws and regulations, an owner or operator of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances on such property. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. Furthermore, a person that arranges for the disposal of a hazardous substance or transports a hazardous substance for disposal or treatment from property owned by another may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous substances released into the environment at that property. The costs of remediation or removal of such substances may be substantial, and the presence of such substances, or the failure to promptly remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell the affected property or to borrow using the affected property as collateral. In connection with the ownership and operation of our properties, we, our operating partnership, or Ashford TRS may be potentially liable for any such costs. In addition, the value of any lodging property loan we make or acquire would be adversely affected if the underlying property contained hazardous or toxic substances.
      Phase I environmental assessments, which are intended to identify potential environmental contamination for which our properties may be responsible, have been obtained on each of our properties. Phase I environmental assessments included:
  •  historical reviews of the properties,
 
  •  reviews of certain public records,
 
  •  preliminary investigations of the sites and surrounding properties,
 
  •  screening for the presence of hazardous substances, toxic substances, and underground storage tanks, and
 
  •  the preparation and issuance of a written report.
      Phase I environmental assessments did not include invasive procedures, such as soil sampling or ground water analysis.
      Phase I environmental assessments have not revealed any environmental liability that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, assets, results of operations, or liquidity, and we are not aware of any such liability. To the extent that Phase I environmental assessments reveal facts that require further investigation, we would perform a Phase II environmental assessment. However, it is possible that these environmental assessments will not reveal all environmental liabilities. There may be material environmental liabilities of which we are unaware, including environmental liabilities that may have arisen since the environmental assessments were completed or updated. No assurances can be given that (i) future laws, ordinances, or regulations will not impose any material environmental liability, or (ii) the current environmental condition of our properties will not be affected by the condition of properties in the vicinity of our properties (such as the presence of leaking underground storage tanks) or by third parties unrelated to the us.
      We believe that our properties are in compliance in all material respects with all federal, state, and local ordinances and regulations regarding hazardous or toxic substances and other environmental matters. Neither we nor, to our knowledge, any of the former owners of our properties have been notified by any governmental

12


Table of Contents

authority of any material noncompliance, liability, or claim relating to hazardous or toxic substances or other environmental matters in connection with any of our properties.
Our Insurance
      We maintain comprehensive insurance, including liability, fire, workers’ compensation, extended coverage, rental loss, environmental, terrorism, and, when available on reasonable commercial terms, flood and earthquake insurance, with policy specifications, limits, and deductibles customarily carried for similar properties. Certain types of losses (for example, matters of a catastrophic nature such as acts of war, earthquakes, or substantial known environmental liabilities) are either uninsurable or require such substantial premiums that the cost of maintaining such insurance is economically infeasible. Certain types of losses, such as those arising from subsidence activity, are insurable only to the extent that certain standard policy exceptions to insurability are waived by agreement with the insurer. We believe, however, that our properties are adequately insured, consistent with industry standards.
Risk Factors
      An investment in our securities involves various risks. You should carefully consider the following risk factors in conjunction with the other information contained herein before purchasing our securities. The risks discussed herein can adversely affect our business, liquidity, operating results, prospects, and financial condition. This could cause the market price of our securities to decline and could cause you to lose all or part of your investment. The risk factors described below are not the only risks that may affect us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us also may adversely affect our business, liquidity, operating results, prospects, and financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Business
Our business strategy depends on our continued growth. We may fail to integrate recent and additional investments into our operations or otherwise manage our planned growth, which may adversely affect our operating results.
      Our business plan contemplates a period of continued growth in the next several years. We cannot assure you that we will be able to adapt our management, administrative, accounting, and operational systems, or hire and retain sufficient operational staff to successfully integrate our recent investments into our portfolio and manage any future acquisitions of additional assets without operating disruptions or unanticipated costs. Acquisition of any additional portfolio of properties or mortgages would generate additional operating expenses that we will be required to pay. As we acquire additional assets, we will be subject to the operational risks associated with owning new lodging properties. Our failure to successfully integrate our recent acquisitions as well as any future acquisitions into our portfolio could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition and our ability to pay dividends to stockholders.
We may be unable to identify additional real estate investments that meet our investment criteria or to acquire the properties we have under contract.
      We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify real estate investments that meet our investment criteria, that we will be successful in completing any investment we identify, or that any investment we complete will produce a return on our investment. Moreover, we will have broad authority to invest in any real estate investments that we may identify in the future. We also cannot assure you that we will acquire the properties we currently have under firm purchase contracts or that the acquisition terms we have negotiated will not change.
Conflicts of interest could result in our management acting other than in our stockholders’ best interest.
      Conflicts of interest relating to Remington Hotel Corporation and Remington Lodging may lead to management decisions that are not in the stockholders’ best interest. The Chairman of our board of directors,

13


Table of Contents

Mr. Archie Bennett, Jr., serves as the Chairman of the board of directors of Remington Hotel Corporation, and our Chief Executive Officer and President, Mr. Montgomery Bennett, serves as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Remington Hotel Corporation. Messrs. Archie and Montgomery Bennett own 100% of Remington Hotel Corporation. As of December 31, 2004, Remington Lodging, which is also 100% owned by Messrs. Archie and Montgomery Bennett, managed 14 of our 33 properties and provided related services, including property management services and project development services. Additionally, Messrs. Archie and Montgomery Bennett own minority interests in several lodging properties not transferred to our operating partnership in connection with our initial public offering.
      Messrs. Archie and Montgomery Bennett’s ownership interests in and management obligations to Remington Hotel Corporation and Remington Lodging present them with conflicts of interest in making management decisions related to the commercial arrangements between us and Remington Lodging and will reduce the time and effort they each spend managing us. Our board of directors has adopted a policy that requires all management decisions relating to the management agreements with Remington Lodging be approved by a majority or, in certain circumstances, all of our independent directors.
      Holders of units in our operating partnership, including members of our management team, may suffer adverse tax consequences upon our sale of certain properties. Therefore, holders of units, either directly or indirectly, including Messrs. Archie and Montgomery Bennett, Mr. David Brooks, our Chief Legal Officer, Mr. Mark Nunneley, our Chief Accounting Officer, and Mr. Martin L. Edelman (or his family members), one of our directors, may have different objectives regarding the appropriate pricing and timing of a particular property’s sale. These officers and directors of ours may influence us not to sell or refinance certain properties, even if such sale or refinancing might be financially advantageous to our stockholders, or to enter into tax deferred exchanges with the proceeds of such sales when such a reinvestment might not otherwise be in our best interest.
      In addition, we agreed to indemnify the contributors of the properties contributed to us in exchange for operating partnership units in connection with our initial public offering, including (indirectly) Messrs. Archie and Montgomery Bennett, Brooks, Nunneley, and Edelman (or his family members), against the income tax they may incur if we dispose of any of these properties. Because of this indemnification, our indemnified management team members may make decisions about selling any of these properties that are not in our stockholders’ best interest.
      We are a party to a master hotel management agreement and an exclusivity agreement with Remington Lodging. Of the 33 hotels we owned at December 31, 2004, 14 were managed by Remington Lodging. Additionally, Remington Lodging will manage the 21 hotel portfolio acquired in March 2005. The management agreement describes the terms of Remington Lodging’s management of the 14 hotels we owned at December 31, 2004 and the 21 hotels acquired in March 2005, as well as any future hotels we may acquire that will be managed by Remington Lodging. If we terminate the management agreement as to any of our hotels that are subject to the management agreement, we will be required to pay Remington Lodging a substantial termination fee. For example, if we were to terminate the management agreement with respect to all 14 of our hotels that were managed by Remington Lodging at December 31, 2004 because we elected to sell those hotels, the fee would be approximately $9.9 million. The exclusivity agreement requires us to engage Remington Lodging, unless our independent directors either (i) unanimously vote to hire a different manager or developer, or (ii) by a majority vote, elect not to engage Remington Lodging because they have determined that special circumstances exist or that, based on Remington Lodging’s prior performance, another manager or developer could perform the duties materially better. As the sole owners of Remington Lodging, which would receive any development, management, and management termination fees payable by us under the management agreement, Messrs. Archie and Montgomery Bennett may influence our decisions to sell a hotel or acquire or develop a hotel when it is not in the best interests of our stockholders to do so.
      In addition, Ashford Financial Corporation, an affiliate, contributed to us asset management and consulting agreements that relate to management and consulting services that Ashford Financial Corporation agreed to perform for hotel property managers with respect to 27 identified hotel properties. Ashford Financial Corporation is 100% owned by Messrs. Archie and Montgomery Bennett. Messrs. Archie and Montgomery

14


Table of Contents

Bennett also have a minority interest in the 27 hotels for which the asset management and consulting services are provided. The agreements provide for annual payments to us, as the assignee of Ashford Financial Corporation, in consideration for our performance of certain asset management and consulting services. The exact amount of the consideration due to us is contingent upon the revenue generated by the hotels underlying the asset management and consulting agreements. Ashford Financial Corporation has guaranteed a minimum payment to us of $1.2 million per year, subject to adjustments based on the consumer price index, for five years beginning on the date of our initial public offering. If any property underlying any asset management and consulting agreement is sold at any time, we will no longer derive any income from such property, and the amount of income we receive under the applicable asset management and consulting agreement will be decreased.
      We recently completed the acquisition of 21 of the 27 hotel properties for which we previously provided the asset management and consulting services. In connection with the acquisition, the asset management and consulting agreements for these properties were terminated, and we will no longer receive any fees under the terminated agreements. We do not expect the remaining six hotel properties for which we provide asset management and consulting services to generate sufficient revenue to result in at least $1.2 million in fees to us per year of the agreement. However, pursuant to the written guaranty agreement executed by Ashford Financial Corporation for our benefit, Ashford Financial Corporation will continue to guarantee a minimum fee of $1.2 million per year for five years from our initial public offering.
      Each of the eight management companies is either owned 100% by Messrs. Archie and Montgomery Bennett, or is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Remington Hotel Corporation, which is owned 100% by Messrs. Archie and Montgomery Bennett. Messrs. Archie and Montgomery Bennett also have a minority ownership interest in the hotel properties benefiting from the services provided pursuant to the asset management and consulting agreements. Although they do not own a controlling interest in such properties, Messrs. Archie and Montgomery Bennett may benefit from a future sale of the properties.
Tax indemnification obligations that apply in the event that we sell certain properties could limit our operating flexibility.
      If we dispose of any of the five properties that were contributed to us in exchange for units in our operating partnership in connection with our initial public offering, we may be obligated to indemnify the contributors, including Messrs. Archie and Monty Bennett whom have substantial ownership interests, against the tax consequences of the sale. We have agreed to pay a contributor’s tax liability if we dispose of a property contributed by a contributor in a taxable transaction before the earlier of:
  •  10 years after the contribution of such property, and
 
  •  the date on which the contributor no longer owns, in the aggregate, at least 25% of the units we issued to the contributor at the time of its contribution of property to our operating partnership.
      This tax indemnity will be equal to the amount of the federal and state income tax liability the contributor incurs with respect to the gain allocated to the contributor. The terms of the contribution agreements also require us to gross up the tax indemnity payment for the amount of income taxes due as a result of the tax indemnity payment. While the tax indemnities do not contractually limit our ability to conduct our business in the way we desire, we are less likely to sell any of the contributed properties in a taxable transaction during the indemnity period. Instead, we would either hold the property for the entire indemnity period or seek to transfer the property in a tax-deferred like-kind exchange. In addition, a condemnation of one of our properties could trigger our tax indemnification obligations.
      In addition, under the tax indemnification agreements, we have agreed for a period of 10 years to use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain non-recourse mortgage indebtedness in the amount of at least $16.0 million, which will allow the contributors to defer recognition of gain in connection with the contribution of the Las Vegas hotel property as part of our formation.
      Additionally, we are prohibited from selling or transferring the Sea Turtle Inn in Atlantic Beach, Florida, until April 1, 2007 if, as a result, the entity from whom we acquired the property would recognize gain for

15


Table of Contents

federal tax purposes. If we sell or transfer this property after April 1, 2007, but prior to April 1, 2009, and the sale or transfer results in the entity that sold us the property having to recognize gain for federal tax purposes, we must pay $180,000 to that entity. However, this amount will be reduced by $7,500 for each passing month from April 1, 2007 until April 1, 2009.
Hotel franchise requirements could adversely affect distributions to our stockholders.
      We must comply with operating standards, terms, and conditions imposed by the franchisors of the hotel brands under which our hotels operate. The franchisors periodically inspect their licensed hotels to confirm adherence to their operating standards. The failure of a hotel to maintain such standards could result in the loss or cancellation of a franchise license. With respect to operational standards, we rely on our property managers to conform to such standards. The franchisors may also require us to make certain capital improvements to maintain the hotel in accordance with system standards, the cost of which can be substantial. It is possible that a franchisor could condition the continuation of a franchise based on the completion of capital improvements that our management or board of directors determines are too expensive or otherwise not economically feasible in light of general economic conditions or the operating results or prospects of the affected hotel. In that event, our management or board of directors may elect to allow the franchise to lapse or be terminated, which could result in a change in brand franchising or operation of the hotel as an independent hotel.
      In addition, when the term of a franchise expires, the franchisor has no obligation to issue a new franchise. The loss of a franchise could have a material adverse effect on the operations or the underlying value of the affected hotel because of the loss of associated name recognition, marketing support, and centralized reservation systems provided by the franchisor. The loss of a franchise could also have a material adverse effect on cash available for distribution to stockholders.
Future terrorist attacks similar in nature to the events of September 11, 2001 may negatively affect the performance of our properties and the hotel industry and may negatively affect our future results of operations and financial condition.
      The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, their after-effects, and the resulting U.S.-led military action in Iraq substantially reduced business and leisure travel throughout the United States and hotel industry revenue per available room, or RevPAR, generally during the period following September 11, 2001. We cannot predict the extent to which additional terrorist attacks, acts of war, or similar events may occur in the future or how such events would directly or indirectly impact the hotel industry or our operating results. Future terrorist attacks, acts of war, or similar events could have further material adverse effects on the hotel industry at large and our operations in particular.
Our investments will be concentrated in particular segments of a single industry.
      Our entire business is hotel related. Our current investment strategy is to acquire or develop mid to upscale hotels, acquire first mortgages on hotel properties, invest in other mortgage-related instruments such as mezzanine loans to hotel owners and operators, and participate in hotel sale-leaseback transactions. Adverse conditions in the hotel industry will have a material adverse effect on our operating and investment revenues and cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
We rely on third party property managers, especially Remington Lodging, to operate our hotels and for a significant majority of our cash flow.
      For us to continue to qualify as a REIT, third parties must operate our hotels. A REIT may lease its hotels to taxable REIT subsidiaries in which the REIT can own up to a 100% interest. A taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS, pays corporate level income tax and may retain any after-tax income. A REIT must satisfy certain conditions to use the TRS structure. One of those conditions is that the TRS must hire, to manage the hotels, an “eligible independent contractor” (“EIC”) that is actively engaged in the trade or business of managing hotels for parties other than the REIT. An EIC cannot (i) own more than 35% of the REIT, (ii) be

16


Table of Contents

owned more than 35% by persons owning more than 35% of the REIT, or (iii) provide any income to the REIT (i.e., the EIC cannot pay fees to the REIT, and the REIT cannot own any debt or equity securities of the EIC).
      Accordingly, while we may lease hotels to a TRS that we own, the TRS must engage a third-party operator to manage the hotels and our ability to direct and control how our hotels are operated is less than if we were able to manage our hotels directly. We have entered into a management agreement with Remington Lodging, which is owned 100% by Messrs. Archie and Montgomery Bennett, to manage 14 of the 33 lodging properties we owned at December 31, 2004, and we have hired unaffiliated third party property managers to manage the remaining 19 properties we owned at that time. Remington Lodging will also manage each of the 21 hotels acquired in March 2005. We do not supervise any of the property managers or their respective personnel on a day-to-day basis, and we cannot assure you that the property managers will manage our properties in a manner that is consistent with their respective obligations under the applicable management agreement or our obligations under our hotel franchise agreements. We also cannot assure you that our property managers will not be negligent in their performance, will not engage in other criminal or fraudulent activity, or will not otherwise default on their respective management obligations to us. If any of the foregoing occurs, our relationships with the franchisors may be damaged, we may be in breach of the franchise agreement, and we could incur liabilities resulting from loss or injury to our property or to persons at our properties. Any of these circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay dividends to stockholders.
If we cannot obtain additional financing, our growth will be limited.
      We are required to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our taxable income, excluding net capital gains, each year to continue to qualify as a REIT. As a result, our retained earnings available to fund acquisitions, development, or other capital expenditures are nominal. Eventually, we will rely upon the availability of additional debt or equity capital to fund these activities. Our long-term ability to grow through acquisitions or development of hotel-related assets will be limited if we cannot obtain additional financing. Market conditions may make it difficult to obtain financing, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing or that we will be able to obtain it on favorable terms.
We may be unable to generate sufficient revenue from operations to pay our operating expenses and to pay dividends to our stockholders.
      As a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income each year to our stockholders. We intend to distribute to our stockholders all or substantially all of our taxable income each year so as to qualify for the tax benefits accorded to REITs, but our ability to make distributions may be adversely affected by the risk factors described herein. We cannot assure you that we will be able to make distributions in the future. In the event of continued or future downturns in our operating results and financial performance or unanticipated capital improvements to our hotels or declines in the value of our mortgage portfolio, we may be unable to declare or pay distributions to our stockholders. The timing and amount of distributions are in the sole discretion of our board of directors, which will consider, among other factors, our financial performance, debt service obligations, applicable debt covenants, and capital expenditure requirements.
We are subject to various risks related to our use of, and dependence on, debt.
      The amount we have to pay on variable-rate debt increases as interest rates increase, which may decrease cash available for distribution to stockholders. We cannot assure you that we will be able to meet our debt service obligations. If we do not meet our debt service obligations, we risk the loss of some or all of our assets to foreclosure. Changes in economic conditions or our financial results or prospects could (i) result in higher interest rates on variable rate debt, (ii) reduce the availability of debt financing generally or debt financing at favorable rates, (iii) reduce cash available for distribution to stockholders, and (iv) increase the risk that we could be forced to liquidate assets to repay debt, any of which could have a material adverse affect on us.

17


Table of Contents

      If we violate covenants in any debt agreements, we could be required to repay all or a portion of our indebtedness before maturity at a time when we might be unable to arrange financing for such repayment on attractive terms, if at all. Violations of certain debt covenants may result in us being unable to borrow unused amounts under our line of credit, even if repayment of some or all the borrowings is not required. In any event, financial covenants under our current or future debt obligations could impair our planned business strategies by limiting our ability to borrow beyond certain amounts or for certain purposes. Our governing instruments do not contain any limitation on our ability to incur indebtedness.
An interest rate mismatch could occur between asset yields and borrowing rates, resulting in decreased yields on our investment portfolio.
      Our operating results will depend in part on differences between the income from our assets (net of credit losses) and our borrowing costs. We intend to fund the origination and acquisition of a portion of our assets with borrowings that have interest rates that reset relatively rapidly, such as monthly or quarterly. We anticipate that, in many cases, the income from our assets will respond more slowly to interest rate fluctuations than the cost of our borrowings, creating a mismatch between asset yields and borrowing rates. Consequently, changes in interest rates, particularly short-term interest rates, may influence our net income. Increases in these rates will tend to decrease our net income and market value of our mortgage assets. We will incur operating losses if interest rate fluctuations result in our interest expense exceeding interest income.
We compete with other hotels for guests. We will also face competition for acquisitions of lodging properties and of desirable mortgage investments.
      The mid to upscale segments of the hotel business are competitive. Our hotels compete on the basis of location, room rates, quality, service levels, reputation, and reservation systems, among many other factors. New hotels may be constructed and these additions to supply create new competitors, in some cases without corresponding increases in demand for hotel rooms. The result in some cases may be lower revenue, which would result in lower cash available for distribution to stockholders.
      We compete for hotel acquisitions with entities that have similar investment objectives as we do. This competition could limit the number of suitable investment opportunities offered to us. It may also increase the bargaining power of property owners seeking to sell to us, making it more difficult for us to acquire new properties on attractive terms or on the terms contemplated in our business plan.
      We also compete for mortgage asset investments with numerous public and private real estate investment vehicles, such as mortgage banks, pension funds, other REITs, institutional investors, and individuals. Mortgages and other investments are often obtained through a competitive bidding process. In addition, competitors may seek to establish relationships with the financial institutions and other firms from which we intend to purchase such assets. Competition may result in higher prices for mortgage assets, lower yields, and a narrower spread of yields over our borrowing costs.
      Many of our competitors are larger than us, may have access to greater capital, marketing, and other resources, may have personnel with more experience than our officers, may be able to accept higher levels of debt or otherwise may tolerate more risk than us, may have better relations with hotel franchisors, sellers, or lenders, and may have other advantages over us in conducting certain business and providing certain services.
We may engage in hedging transactions, which can limit our gains and increase exposure to losses.
      We may enter into hedging transactions to protect us from the effects of interest rate fluctuations on floating rate debt and also to protect our portfolio of mortgage assets from interest rate and prepayment rate fluctuations. Our hedging transactions may include entering into interest rate swap agreements or interest rate cap or floor agreements, purchasing or selling futures contracts, purchasing put and call options on securities or securities underlying futures contracts, or entering into forward rate agreements. Hedging activities may not have the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations or financial condition. No hedging activity can

18


Table of Contents

completely insulate us from the risks associated with changes in interest rates and prepayment rates. Moreover, interest rate hedging could fail to protect us or adversely affect us because, among other things:
  •  Available interest rate hedging may not correspond directly with the interest rate risk for which protection is sought.
 
  •  The duration of the hedge may not match the duration of the related liability.
 
  •  The party owing money in the hedging transaction may default on its obligation to pay.
 
  •  The credit quality of the party owing money on the hedge may be downgraded to such an extent that it impairs our ability to sell or assign our side of the hedging transaction.
 
  •  The value of derivatives used for hedging may be adjusted from time to time in accordance with accounting rules to reflect changes in fair value. Downward adjustments, or “mark-to-market losses,” would reduce our stockholders’ equity.
      Hedging involves risk and typically involves costs, including transaction costs, which may reduce our overall returns on our investments. These costs increase as the period covered by the hedging increases and during periods of rising and volatile interest rates. These costs will also limit the amount of cash available for distributions to stockholders. We generally intend to hedge as much of the interest rate risk as management determines is in our best interests given the cost of such hedging transactions. The REIT qualification rules may limit our ability to enter into hedging transactions by requiring us to limit our income from hedges. If we are unable to hedge effectively because of the REIT rules, we will face greater interest rate exposure than may be commercially prudent.
We may not be able to sell our investments on favorable terms.
      We may decide to sell investments for a variety of reasons. We cannot assure you that we will be able to sell any of our investments on favorable terms, or that our investments will not be sold for a loss.
Risks Related to Hotel Investments
We are subject to general risks associated with operating hotels.
      Our hotels (and the hotels underlying our mortgage and mezzanine loans) are subject to various operating risks common to the hotel industry, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:
  •  our hotels compete with other hotel properties in their geographic markets and many of our competitors have substantial marketing and financial resources;
 
  •  over-building in our markets, which adversely affects occupancy and revenues at our hotels;
 
  •  dependence on business and commercial travelers and tourism; and
 
  •  adverse effects of general, regional and local economic conditions and increases in energy costs or labor costs and other expenses affecting travel, which may affect travel patterns and reduce the number of business and commercial travelers and tourists.
      These factors could adversely affect our hotel revenues and expenses, as well as the hotels underlying our mortgage and mezzanine loans, which in turn would adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
We may have to make significant capital expenditures to maintain our lodging properties.
      Our hotels have an ongoing need for renovations and other capital improvements, including replacements of furniture, fixtures and equipment. The franchisors of our hotels may also require periodic capital

19


Table of Contents

improvements as a condition of keeping the franchise licenses. Generally, we are responsible for the cost of these capital improvements, which gives rise to the following risks:
  •  cost overruns and delays;
 
  •  renovations can be disruptive to operations and can displace revenue at the hotels, including revenue lost while rooms under renovation are out of service;
 
  •  the cost of funding renovations and the possibility that financing for these renovations may not be available on attractive terms; and
 
  •  the risk that the return on our investment in these capital improvements will not be what we expect.
      If we have insufficient cash flow from operations to fund needed capital expenditures, then we will need to borrow to fund future capital improvements.
The hotel business is seasonal, which will affect our results of operations from quarter to quarter.
      The hotel industry is seasonal in nature. Generally, occupancy rates and hotel revenues are greater in the second and third quarters than in the first and fourth quarters. This seasonality can cause quarterly fluctuations in our revenues.
Our development activities may be more costly than we have anticipated.
      As part of our growth strategy, we may develop additional hotels. Hotel development involves substantial risks, including that:
  •  actual development costs may exceed our budgeted or contracted amounts;
 
  •  construction delays may prevent us from opening hotels on schedule;
 
  •  we may not be able to obtain all necessary zoning, land use, building, occupancy, and construction permits;
 
  •  our developed properties may not achieve our desired revenue or profit goals; and
 
  •  we may incur substantial development costs and then have to abandon a development project before completion
Risks Relating to Investments in Mortgages and Mezzanine Loans
Mortgage investments that are not United States government insured and non-investment grade mortgage assets involve risk of loss.
      As part of our business strategy, we originate and acquire lodging-related uninsured and non-investment grade mortgage loans and mortgage assets, including mezzanine loans. While holding these interests, we are subject to risks of borrower defaults, bankruptcies, fraud and related losses, and special hazard losses that are not covered by standard hazard insurance. Also, the costs of financing the mortgage loans could exceed the return on the mortgage loans. In the event of any default under mortgage loans held by us, we will bear the risk of loss of principal and non-payment of interest and fees to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the mortgage collateral and the principal amount of the mortgage loan. To the extent we suffer such losses with respect to our investments in mortgage loans, our value and the price of our securities may be adversely affected.
We invest in non-recourse loans, which will limit our recovery to the value of the mortgaged property.
      Our mortgage loan assets are generally non-recourse. With respect to our non-recourse mortgage loan assets, in the event of a borrower default, the specific mortgaged property and other assets, if any, pledged to secure the relevant mortgage loan may be less than the amount owed under the mortgage loan. As to those

20


Table of Contents

mortgage loan assets that provide for recourse against the borrower and its assets, generally we cannot assure you that the recourse will provide a recovery in respect of a defaulted mortgage loan greater than the liquidation value of the mortgaged property securing that mortgage loan.
Interest rate fluctuations affect the value of our mortgage assets, net income and securities.
      Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations, and other factors beyond our control. Interest rate fluctuations can adversely affect our income and value of our securities in many ways and present a variety of risks, including the risk of variances in the yield curve, a mismatch between asset yields and borrowing rates, and changing prepayment rates.
      Variances in the yield curve may reduce our net income. The relationship between short-term and longer-term interest rates is often referred to as the “yield curve.” Short-term interest rates are ordinarily lower than longer-term interest rates. If short-term interest rates rise disproportionately relative to longer-term interest rates (a flattening of the yield curve), our borrowing costs may increase more rapidly than the interest income earned on our assets. Additionally, to the extent cash flows from investments that return scheduled and unscheduled principal are reinvested in mortgage loans, the spread between the yields of the new investments and available borrowing rates may decline, which would likely decrease our net income. It is also possible that short-term interest rates may exceed longer-term interest rates (a yield curve inversion), in which event our borrowing costs may exceed our interest income and we could incur operating losses.
Prepayment rates on our mortgage loans may adversely affect our yields.
      The value of our mortgage loan assets may be affected by prepayment rates on investments. Prepayment rates are influenced by changes in current interest rates and a variety of economic, geographic, and other factors beyond our control, and consequently, such prepayment rates cannot be predicted with certainty. To the extent we originate mortgage loans, we expect that such mortgage loans will have a measure of protection from prepayment in the form of prepayment lock-out periods or prepayment penalties. However, this protection may not be available with respect to investments that we acquire but do not originate. The majority of the mortgage loans assets we currently have in our investment portfolio have some combination of prepayment lock-out periods or prepayment penalties; however, we cannot assure you that these lock-out periods or penalties will sufficiently protect us from prepayment risk or that future mortgage loans we acquire will have prepayment protection mechanisms.
      In periods of declining mortgage interest rates, prepayments on mortgages generally increase. If general interest rates decline as well, the proceeds of prepayments received during such periods are likely to be reinvested by us in assets yielding less than the yields on the investments that were prepaid. In addition, the market value of mortgage investments may, because of the risk of prepayment, benefit less from declining interest rates than from other fixed-income securities. Conversely, in periods of rising interest rates, prepayments on mortgages generally decrease, in which case we would not have the prepayment proceeds available to invest in assets with higher yields. Under certain interest rate and prepayment scenarios, we may fail to fully recoup our cost of acquisition of certain investments.
      In making any investment, we consider the expected yield of the investment and the factors that may influence the yield actually obtained on such investment. These considerations affect our decision whether to originate or purchase an investment and the price offered for that investment. No assurances can be given that we can make an accurate assessment of the yield to be produced by an investment. Many factors beyond our control are likely to influence the yield on the investments, including, but not limited to, competitive conditions in the local real estate market, local and general economic conditions, and the quality of management of the underlying property. Our inability to accurately assess investment yields may result in our purchasing assets that do not perform as well as expected, which may adversely affect the price of our securities.

21


Table of Contents

Volatility of values of mortgaged properties may adversely affect our mortgage loans.
      Lodging property values and net operating income derived from lodging properties are subject to volatility and may be affected adversely by a number of factors, including the risk factors described herein relating to general economic conditions, operating lodging properties, and owning real estate investments. In the event its net operating income decreases, a borrower may have difficulty paying our mortgage loan, which could result in losses to us. In addition, decreases in property values reduce the value of the collateral and the potential proceeds available to a borrower to repay our mortgage loans, which could also cause us to suffer losses.
Mezzanine loans involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by income producing properties.
      We make and acquire mezzanine loans. These types of mortgage loans are considered to involve a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage lending secured by income-producing real property due to a variety of factors, including the loan being entirely unsecured or, if secured, becoming unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. We may not recover some or all of our investment in these loans. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan-to-value ratios than conventional mortgage loans resulting in less equity in the property and increasing the risk of loss of principal.
Risks Related to the Real Estate Industry
Mortgage debt obligations expose us to increased risk of property losses, which could harm our financial condition, cash flow, and ability to satisfy our other debt obligations and pay dividends.
      Incurring mortgage debt increases our risk of property losses because defaults on indebtedness secured by properties may result in foreclosure actions initiated by lenders and ultimately our loss of the property securing any loans for which we are in default. For tax purposes, a foreclosure of any of our properties would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure but would not receive any cash proceeds. As a result, we may be required to identify and utilize other sources of cash for distributions to our stockholders of that income.
      In addition, our default under any one of our mortgage debt obligations may result in a default on our other indebtedness. If this occurs, our financial condition, cash flow, and ability to satisfy our other debt obligations or ability to pay dividends may be harmed.
Illiquidity of real estate investments could significantly impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties and harm our financial condition.
      Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, our ability to promptly sell one or more properties or mortgage loans in our portfolio in response to changing economic, financial, and investment conditions is limited. The real estate market is affected by many factors that are beyond our control, including:
  •  adverse changes in national and local economic and market conditions;
 
  •  changes in interest rates and in the availability, cost, and terms of debt financing;
 
  •  changes in governmental laws and regulations, fiscal policies, and zoning and other ordinances, and costs of compliance with laws and regulations;
 
  •  the ongoing need for capital improvements, particularly in older structures;
 
  •  changes in operating expenses; and
 
  •  civil unrest, acts of war, and natural disasters, including earthquakes and floods, which may result in uninsured and underinsured losses.

22


Table of Contents

      We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any property or loan for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We also cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property or loan. Because we intend to offer more flexible terms on our mortgage loans than some providers of commercial mortgage loans, we may have more difficulty selling or participating our loans to secondary purchasers than would these more traditional lenders.
      We may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We cannot assure you that we will have funds available to correct those defects or to make those improvements. In acquiring a property, we may agree to lock-out provisions that materially restrict us from selling that property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that property. These factors and any others that would impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay dividends to stockholders.
The costs of compliance with or liabilities under environmental laws may harm our operating results.
      Our properties and the properties underlying our loan assets may be subject to environmental liabilities. An owner of real property, or a lender with respect to a property that exercises control over the property, can face liability for environmental contamination created by the presence or discharge of hazardous substances on the property. We may face liability regardless of:
  •  our knowledge of the contamination;
 
  •  the timing of the contamination;
 
  •  the cause of the contamination; or
 
  •  the party responsible for the contamination of the property.
      There may be environmental problems associated with our properties or properties underlying our loan assets of which we are unaware. Some of our properties or the properties underlying our loan assets use, or may have used in the past, underground tanks for the storage of petroleum-based or waste products that could create a potential for release of hazardous substances. If environmental contamination exists on a property, we could become subject to strict, joint, and several liability for the contamination if we own the property or if we foreclose on the property or otherwise have control over the property.
      The presence of hazardous substances on a property we own or have made a loan with respect to may adversely affect our ability to sell or foreclose on the property, and we may incur substantial remediation costs. The discovery of environmental liabilities attached to our properties or the properties underlying our loan assets could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition and our ability to pay dividends to stockholders.
      We have environmental insurance policies on each of our owned properties, and we intend to obtain environmental insurance for any other properties that we may acquire. However, if environmental liabilities are discovered during the underwriting of the insurance policies for any property that we may acquire in the future, we may be unable to obtain insurance coverage for the liabilities at commercially reasonable rates or at all, and we may experience losses. In addition, we generally do not require our borrowers to obtain environmental insurance on the properties they own that secure their loans from us.
Our properties and the properties underlying our mortgage loans may contain or develop harmful mold, which could lead to liability for adverse health effects and costs of remediating the problem.
      When excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. Concern about indoor exposure to mold has been increasing as exposure to mold may cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions. As a result, the presence of significant mold at any of our properties or the properties underlying our

23


Table of Contents

loan assets could require us or our borrowers to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold from the affected property. In addition, the presence of significant mold could expose us or our borrowers to liability from guests, employees, and others if property damage or health concerns arise.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and fire, safety, and other regulations may require us or our borrowers to make unintended expenditures that adversely impact our operating results.
      All of our properties and the properties underlying our mortgage loans are required to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, or the ADA. The ADA requires that “public accommodations” such as hotels be made accessible to people with disabilities. Compliance with the ADA requirements could require removal of access barriers and non-compliance could result in imposition of fines by the U.S. government or an award of damages to private litigants, or both. We or our borrowers may be required to expend funds to comply with the provisions of the ADA at our hotels or the hotels underlying our loan assets, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make distributions to stockholders. In addition, we and our borrowers are required to operate our properties in compliance with fire and safety regulations, building codes, and other land use regulations, as they may be adopted by governmental agencies and bodies and become applicable to our properties. We and our borrowers may be required to make substantial capital expenditures to comply with those requirements, and these expenditures could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay dividends to stockholders.
We may experience uninsured or underinsured losses.
      We have property and casualty insurance with respect to our properties and other insurance, in each case, with loss limits and coverage thresholds deemed reasonable by our management (and with the intent to satisfy the requirements of lenders and franchisors). In doing so, we have made decisions with respect to what deductibles, policy limits, and terms are reasonable based on management’s experience, our risk profile, the loss history of our property managers and our properties, the nature of our properties and our businesses, our loss prevention efforts, and the cost of insurance.
      Various types of catastrophic losses may not be insurable or may not be economically insurable. In the event of a substantial loss, our insurance coverage may not cover the full current market value or replacement cost of our lost investment. Inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations, and other factors might cause insurance proceeds to be insufficient to fully replace or renovate a hotel after it has been damaged or destroyed. Accordingly, there can be no assurance (i) that the insurance coverage thresholds that we have obtained will fully protect us against insurable losses (i.e., losses may exceed coverage limits); (ii) that we will not incur large deductibles that will adversely affect our earnings; (iii) that we will not incur losses from risks that are not insurable or that are not economically insurable; or (iv) that current coverage thresholds will continue to be available at reasonable rates. We do not intend to maintain terrorism insurance on any of our properties. As a result, one or more large uninsured or underinsured losses could have a material adverse affect on us.
      Each of our current lenders requires us to maintain certain insurance coverage thresholds, and we anticipate that future lenders will have similar requirements. We believe that we have complied with the insurance maintenance requirements under the current governing loan documents and we intend to comply with any such requirements in any future loan documents. However, a lender may disagree, in which case the lender could obtain additional coverage thresholds and seek payment from us, or declare us in default under the loan documents. In the former case, we could spend more for insurance than we otherwise deem reasonable or necessary, or, in the latter case, subject us to a foreclosure on hotels collateralizing one or more loans. In addition, a material casualty to one or more hotels collateralizing loans may result in (i) the insurance company applying to the outstanding loan balance insurance proceeds that otherwise would be available to repair the damage caused by the casualty, which would require us to fund the repairs through other sources, or (ii) the lender foreclosing on the hotels if there is a material loss that is not insured.

24


Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Status as a REIT
If we do not qualify as a REIT, we will be subject to tax as a regular corporation and face substantial tax liability.
      We operate so as to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. However, qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which only a limited number of judicial or administrative interpretations exist. Even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status. Furthermore, new tax legislation, administrative guidance, or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for us to qualify as a REIT. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any tax year, then:
  •  we would be taxed as a regular domestic corporation, which, among other things, means being unable to deduct distributions to stockholders in computing taxable income and being subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates;
 
  •  we would also be subject to federal alternative minimum tax and, possibly, increased state and local taxes;
 
  •  any resulting tax liability could be substantial and would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to stockholders; and
 
  •  unless we were entitled to relief under applicable statutory provisions, we would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the subsequent four taxable years following the year during which we lost our qualification, and, thus, our cash available for distribution to stockholders would be reduced for each of the years during which we did not qualify as a REIT.
      If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will not be required to make distributions to stockholders to maintain our tax status. As a result of all of these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT would impair our ability to raise capital, expand our business, and make distributions to our stockholders and would adversely affect the value of our securities.
Even if we remain qualified as a REIT, we may face other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow.
      Even if we remain qualified for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain federal, state, and local taxes on our income and assets. For example:
  •  We will be required to pay tax on undistributed REIT taxable income.
 
  •  We may be required to pay the “alternative minimum tax” on our items of tax preference.
 
  •  If we have net income from the disposition of foreclosure property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business or other non-qualifying income from foreclosure property, we must pay tax on that income at the highest corporate rate.
 
  •  If we sell a property in a “prohibited transaction,” our gain from the sale would be subject to a 100% penalty tax. A “prohibited transaction” would be a sale of property, other than a foreclosure property, held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business.
 
  •  Our taxable REIT subsidiary, Ashford TRS, is a fully taxable corporation and will be required to pay federal and state taxes on its income.
Complying with REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.
      To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders, and the ownership of our stock. We may be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Thus,

25


Table of Contents

compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.
Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively.
      The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code may limit our ability to hedge mortgage securities and related borrowings by requiring us to limit our income in each year from qualified hedges, together with any other income not generated from qualified real estate assets, to no more than 25% of our gross income. In addition, we must limit our aggregate income from nonqualified hedging transactions, from our provision of services and from other non-qualifying sources to no more than 5% of our annual gross income. As a result, we may have to limit our use of advantageous hedging techniques. This could result in greater risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to incur. If we were to violate the 25% or 5% limitations, we may have to pay a penalty tax equal to the amount of income in excess of those limitations, multiplied by a fraction intended to reflect our profitability. If we fail to satisfy the REIT gross income tests, unless our failure was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, we could lose our REIT status for federal income tax purposes.
Complying with REIT requirements may force us to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.
      To qualify as a REIT, we must also ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities, and qualified REIT real estate assets. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) generally cannot include more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 20% of the value of our total securities can be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct such failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter to avoid losing our REIT status and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.
Complying with REIT requirements may force us to borrow to make distributions to stockholders.
      As a REIT, we must distribute at least 90% of our annual taxable income (subject to certain adjustments) to our stockholders. To the extent that we satisfy the distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on our undistributed taxable income. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we pay out to our stockholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under federal tax laws.
      From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our net income for financial reporting purposes due to, among other things, amortization of capitalized purchase premiums, or our taxable income may be greater than our cash flow available for distribution to stockholders. If we do not have other funds available in these situations, we could be required to borrow funds, sell investments at disadvantageous prices, or find another alternative source of funds to make distributions sufficient to enable us to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our equity.
We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes that could reduce the market price of our securities.
      At any time, the federal income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended. Any of those new laws or interpretations may take effect retroactively and could adversely affect us or you as a stockholder. On May 28, 2003, the President signed the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, which we refer to as the Jobs and Growth Tax Act. Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002, the Jobs and Growth Tax Act reduced the maximum rate of tax

26


Table of Contents

applicable to individuals on dividend income from regular C corporations from 38.6% to 15.0%. This reduced substantially the so-called “double taxation” (that is, taxation at both the corporate and stockholder levels) that has generally applied to corporations that are not taxed as REITs. Generally, dividends from REITs will not qualify for the dividend tax reduction. The implementation of the Jobs and Growth Tax Act could cause individual investors to view stocks of non-REIT corporations as more attractive relative to shares of REITs than was the case previously because the dividends paid by non-REIT corporations would be subject to lower tax rates for the individual. We cannot predict whether in fact this will occur or whether, if it occurs, what the impact will be on the value of our securities.
Your investment in our securities has various federal, state and local income tax risks that could affect the value of your investment.
      Although the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code relevant to your investment in our securities are generally described elsewhere herein, we strongly urge you to consult your own tax advisor concerning the effects of federal, state, and local income tax law on an investment in our securities, because of the complex nature of the tax rules applicable to REITs and their stockholders.
Risk Factors Related to Our Corporate Structure
There are no assurances of our ability to make distributions in the future.
      We intend to continue paying quarterly dividends and to make distributions to our stockholders in amounts such that all or substantially all of our taxable income in each year, subject to certain adjustments, is distributed. This, along with other factors, should enable us to qualify for the tax benefits accorded to a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. However, our ability to pay dividends may be adversely affected by the risk factors described herein. All distributions will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our earnings, our financial condition, maintenance of our REIT status, and such other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time. There are no assurances of our ability to pay dividends in the future. In addition, some of our distributions may include a return of capital.
Failure to maintain an exemption from the Investment Company Act would adversely affect our results of operations.
      We believe that we will conduct our business in a manner that allows us to avoid registration as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, or the 1940 Act. Under Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the 1940 Act, entities that are primarily engaged in the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring “mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate” are not treated as investment companies. The SEC staff’s position generally requires us to maintain at least 55% of our assets directly in qualifying real estate interests to be able to rely on this exemption. To constitute a qualifying real estate interest under this 55% requirement, a real estate interest must meet various criteria. Mortgage securities that do not represent all of the certificates issued with respect to an underlying pool of mortgages may be treated as securities separate from the underlying mortgage loans and, thus, may not qualify for purposes of the 55% requirement. Our ownership of these mortgage securities, therefore, is limited by the provisions of the 1940 Act and SEC staff interpretive positions. There are no assurances that efforts to pursue our intended investment program will not be adversely affected by operation of these rules.
Our charter does not permit ownership in excess of 9.8% of our capital stock, and attempts to acquire our capital stock in excess of the 9.8% limit without approval from our board of directors are void.
      For the purpose of preserving our REIT qualification, our charter prohibits direct or constructive ownership by any person of more than 9.8% of the lesser of the total number or value of the outstanding shares of our common stock or more than 9.8% of the lesser of the total number or value of the outstanding shares of our preferred stock. Our charter’s constructive ownership rules are complex and may cause the outstanding stock owned by a group of related individuals or entities to be deemed to be constructively owned by one

27


Table of Contents

individual or entity. As a result, the acquisition of less than 9.8% of the outstanding stock by an individual or entity could cause that individual or entity to own constructively in excess of 9.8% of the outstanding stock, and thus be subject to our charter’s ownership limit. Any attempt to own or transfer shares of our common or preferred stock in excess of the ownership limit without the consent of the board of directors will be void, and could result in the shares being automatically transferred to a charitable trust.
Because provisions contained in Maryland law and our charter may have an anti-takeover effect, investors may be prevented from receiving a “control premium” for their shares.
      Provisions contained in our charter and Maryland general corporation law may have effects that delay, defer, or prevent a takeover attempt, which may prevent stockholders from receiving a “control premium” for their shares. For example, these provisions may defer or prevent tender offers for our common stock or purchases of large blocks of our common stock, thereby limiting the opportunities for our stockholders to receive a premium for their common stock over then-prevailing market prices. These provisions include the following:
  •  Ownership limit: The ownership limit in our charter limits related investors, including, among other things, any voting group, from acquiring over 9.8% of our common stock without our permission.
 
  •  Classification of preferred stock: Our charter authorizes our board of directors to issue preferred stock in one or more classes and to establish the preferences and rights of any class of preferred stock issued. These actions can be taken without soliciting stockholder approval. The issuance of preferred stock could have the effect of delaying or preventing someone from taking control of us, even if a change in control were in our stockholders’ best interests.
      Maryland statutory law provides that an act of a director relating to or affecting an acquisition or a potential acquisition of control of a corporation may not be subject to a higher duty or greater scrutiny than is applied to any other act of a director. Hence, directors of a Maryland corporation are not required to act in takeover situations under the same standards as apply in Delaware and other corporate jurisdictions.
Offerings of debt securities, which would be senior to our common stock and any preferred stock upon liquidation, or equity securities, which would dilute our existing stockholders and may be senior to our common stock for the purposes of dividend distributions, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and any preferred stock.
      We have offered preferred stock and may offer debt securities. Additionally, in the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by making additional offerings of debt or equity securities, including commercial paper, medium-term notes, senior or subordinated notes, and classes of preferred stock or common stock or classes of preferred units. Upon liquidation, holders of our debt securities or preferred units and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of shares of preferred stock or common stock, and holders of our debt securities and shares of preferred stock or preferred units and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute the holdings of our existing stockholders or reduce the market price of our common or preferred stock, or both. Our preferred stock or preferred units, if issued, could have a preference on liquidating distributions or a preference on dividend payments that could limit our ability to make a dividend distribution to the holders of our common stock. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing, or nature of our future offerings. Thus, our stockholders bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our securities and diluting their securities holdings in us.
Securities eligible for future sale may have adverse effects on the market price of our securities.
      We cannot predict the effect, if any, of future sales of securities, or the availability of securities for future sales, on the market price of our outstanding securities. Sales of substantial amounts of common stock (including (i) 6,097,925 shares of common stock which can be issued, at our option, in exchange for

28


Table of Contents

outstanding units in our operating partnership, (ii) 288,239 shares of common stock which were issued to certain of our directors, executive officers, and employees of the company and its affiliates and are now fully vested and unrestricted, (iii) 506,478 restricted shares, issued to certain of our directors, executive officers, and employees of the company and its affiliates, which, in the case of the executive officers and employees, are subject to continued employment by such officer or employee, and (iv) restricted shares issuable to executive officers only if specified performance criteria are satisfied) or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our securities.
      We also may issue from time to time additional shares of securities or units of our operating partnership in connection with the acquisition of properties and we may grant additional demand or piggyback registration rights in connection with these issuances. Sales of substantial amounts of our securities or the perception that these sales could occur may adversely affect the prevailing market price for our securities or may impair our ability to raise capital through a sale of additional debt or equity securities.
We depend on key personnel with long-standing business relationships, the loss of whom could threaten our ability to operate our business successfully.
      Our future success depends, to a significant extent, upon the continued services of our management team. In particular, the lodging industry experience of Messrs. Archie and Montgomery Bennett, Kessler, Brooks, Kimichik, and Nunneley and the extent and nature of the relationships they have developed with hotel franchisors, operators, and owners and hotel lending and other financial institutions are critically important to the success of our business. We do not maintain key person life insurance on any of our officers. Although these officers currently have employment agreements with us through 2006 (2007 for Mr. Montgomery Bennett), we cannot assure you of the continued employment of all of our officers. The loss of services of one or more members of our corporate management team could harm our business and our prospects.
An increase in market interest rates may have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities.
      One of the factors that investors may consider in deciding whether to buy or sell our securities is our dividend rate as a percentage of our share or unit price, relative to market interest rates. If market interest rates increase, prospective investors may desire a higher dividend or interest rate on our securities or seek securities paying higher dividends or interest. The market price of our securities likely will be based primarily on the earnings and return that we derive from our investments and income with respect to our properties and our related distributions to stockholders, and not from the market value or underlying appraised value of the properties or investments themselves. As a result, interest rate fluctuations and capital market conditions can affect the market price of our securities. For instance, if interest rates rise without an increase in our dividend rate, the market price of our common or preferred stock could decrease because potential investors may require a higher dividend yield on our common or preferred stock as market rates on interest-bearing securities, such as bonds, rise. In addition, rising interest rates would result in increased interest expense on our variable rate debt, thereby adversely affecting cash flow and our ability to service our indebtedness and pay dividends.
Our major policies, including our policies and practices with respect to investments, financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification, and distributions, are determined by our board of directors. Although we have no present intention to do so, our board of directors may amend or revise these and other policies from time to time without a vote of our stockholders. Accordingly, our stockholders will have limited control over changes in our policies and the changes could harm our business, results of operations, and share price.
      Changes in our strategy or investment or leverage policy could expose us to greater credit risk and interest rate risk or could result in a more leveraged balance sheet. We cannot predict the effect any changes to our current operating policies and strategies may have on our business, operating results, and stock price. However, the effects may be adverse.

29


Table of Contents

Our Franchise Licenses
      We believe that the public’s perception of quality associated with a franchisor is an important feature in the operation of a hotel. Franchisors provide a variety of benefits for franchisees, which include national advertising, publicity, and other marketing programs designed to increase brand awareness, training of personnel, continuous review of quality standards, and centralized reservation systems. As of December 31, 2004, the Company owned 33 hotels, 32 of which operated under the following franchise licenses:
      Embassy Suites is a registered trademark of Hilton Hospitality, Inc.
      Radisson is a registered trademark of Radisson Hotels International, Inc.
      Doubletree is a registered trademark of Hilton Hospitality, Inc.
      Hilton Garden Inn is a registered trademark of Hilton Hospitality, Inc.
      SpringHill Suites is a registered trademark of Marriott International, Inc.
      Homewood Suites by Hilton is a registered trademark of Hilton Hospitality, Inc.
      Hampton Inn is a registered trademark of Hilton Hospitality, Inc.
      Residence Inn by Marriott is a trademark of Marriott International, Inc.
      Courtyard by Marriott is a trademark of Marriott International, Inc.
      Fairfield Inn by Marriott is a trademark of Marriott International, Inc.
      Hyatt Regency is a trademark of Hyatt Corporation.
      Sheraton is a trademark of Sheraton Hotels and Resorts, a division of Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc.
      Our management companies, including Remington Lodging, must operate each hotel pursuant to the terms of the related franchise agreement, and must use their best efforts to maintain the right to operate each hotel as such. In the event of termination of a particular franchise agreement, our management companies must operate the effected hotels under such other franchise agreement, if any, as we enter into or obtain as franchisee. We anticipate that most of the additional hotels we acquire will be operated under franchise licenses as well.
      Our franchise licenses generally specify certain management, operational, recordkeeping, accounting, reporting, and marketing standards and procedures with which the franchisee must comply, including requirements related to:
  •  training of operational personnel;
 
  •  safety;
 
  •  maintaining specified insurance;
 
  •  the types of services and products ancillary to guestroom services that may be provided;
 
  •  display of signage; and
 
  •  the type, quality, and age of furniture, fixtures, and equipment included in guestrooms, lobbies, and other common areas.
Seasonality
      Our properties’ operations historically have been seasonal as certain properties maintain higher occupancy rates during the summer months. This seasonality pattern can be expected to cause fluctuations in our quarterly lease revenue under the percentage leases. We anticipate that our cash flow from the operation of the properties will be sufficient to enable us to make quarterly distributions to maintain our REIT status. To the extent that cash flow from operations is insufficient during any quarter due to temporary or seasonal

30


Table of Contents

fluctuations in lease revenue, we expect to utilize other cash on hand or borrowings to make required distributions. However, we cannot make any assurances that we will make distributions in the future.
Item 2. Properties
      As of December 31, 2004, we owned 33 hotel properties located in fourteen states with 5,095 rooms. We own our hotels in fee simple except for the Radisson Hotel in Covington, Kentucky, which we own partially in fee simple and partially pursuant to a ground lease that expires in 2070 (including all extensions), and the Doubletree Guest Suites in Columbus, Ohio, which was built on an air rights lease above the parking garage that expires in 2045. These hotel properties are held for investment purposes and operated by our managers. The following table sets forth certain descriptive information regarding these hotels as of December 31, 2004:
                   
Hotel Property   Location   Rooms
         
Embassy Suites
    Austin, TX       150  
Embassy Suites
    Dallas, TX       150  
Embassy Suites
    Herndon, VA       150  
Embassy Suites
    Las Vegas, NV       220  
Embassy Suites
    Phoenix, AZ       229  
Embassy Suites
    Syracuse, NY       215  
Embassy Suites
    Flagstaff, AZ       119  
Radisson Hotel
    Covington, KY       236  
Radisson Hotel
    Holtsville, NY       188  
Doubletree Guest Suites
    Columbus, OH       194  
Doubletree Guest Suites
    Dayton, OH       137  
Hilton Garden Inn
    Jacksonville, FL       119  
Homewood Suites
    Mobile, AL       86  
Hampton Inn
    Lawrenceville, GA       86  
Hampton Inn
    Evansville, IN       141  
Hampton Inn
    Terre Haute, IN       112  
Hampton Inn
    Horse Cave, KY       101  
Hampton Inn
    Buford, GA       92  
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
    Jacksonville, FL       102  
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
    Baltimore, MD       133  
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
    Kennesaw, GA       90  
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
    Buford, GA       96  
Fairfield Inn & Suites
    Kennesaw, GA       87  
Fairfield Inn by Marriott
    Evansville, IN       110  
Fairfield Inn by Marriott
    Princeton, IN       73  
Courtyard by Marriott
    Bloomington, IN       117  
Courtyard by Marriott
    Columbus, IN       90  
Courtyard by Marriott
    Louisville, KY       150  
Marriott Residence Inn
    Lake Buena Vista, FL       210  
Marriott Residence Inn
    Evansville, IN       78  
Sea Turtle
    Altantic Beach, FL       193  
Sheraton Bucks County
    Langhorne, PA       187  
Hyatt Regency Orange County
    Anaheim, CA       654  
             
 
Total
            5,095  
             

31


Table of Contents

Item 3. Legal Proceedings
      We are currently subject to litigation arising in the normal course of its business. In the opinion of management, none of these lawsuits or claims against the Company, either individually or in the aggregate, is likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition. In addition, we believe we have adequate insurance in place to cover such litigation.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
      No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2004.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Market Information
      Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AHT.” The following table sets forth for the indicated periods the high and low sales prices for our common stock, as traded on that exchange, since our inception:
                 
    Price Range
     
    High   Low
         
2003
               
August 29, 2003 (inception) through September 30, 2003
  $ 9.50     $ 8.85  
Fourth quarter
  $ 9.80     $ 8.97  
2004
               
First quarter
  $ 10.52     $ 9.10  
Second quarter
  $ 10.50     $ 8.10  
Third quarter
  $ 9.55     $ 8.35  
Fourth quarter
  $ 11.09     $ 9.25  
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
      On December 27, 2004, the Company entered into a Series B Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement with Security Capital Secured Growth Incorporated (“Security Capital”) for the sale of up to $75.0 million in Series B cumulative convertible redeemable preferred stock. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, Security Capital may purchase up to 5,162,000 shares of Series B-1 Preferred Stock of the Company and up to 2,285,865 shares of Series B-2 Preferred Stock of the Company, in each case at a per-share price of $10.07, which was determined using a 20-day average closing price calculated five business days prior to execution of the agreement. The two series of preferred stock are identical except with respect to voting rights and convertibility features and are referred to herein collectively as the Series B Preferred Stock. Each share of Series B-1 Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time into the number of shares of common stock of the Company obtained by dividing $10.07 by the conversion price then in effect. The initial conversion price of the Class B-1 Preferred Stock is $10.07, subject to certain adjustments, as set forth in the purchase agreement. Additionally, all holders of Series B-1 Preferred Stock are entitled to vote, on an as-converted basis voting as a single class together with the holders of common stock, on all matters to be voted on by the Company’s stockholders. The Series B-2 Preferred Stock will automatically convert into Series B-1 Preferred Stock on a share-for-share basis immediately upon the earliest to occur of (i) approval of the stockholders of the Company as required by the applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange or (ii) a determination by the board of directors of the Company that such stockholder vote is not required. The holders of Series B-2 Preferred Stock have no voting rights.

32


Table of Contents

      The Series B Preferred Stock is redeemable for cash at the option of the Company at the liquidation preference, which is set at $10.07, after three years (or two years if certain criteria, as set forth in the purchase agreement, are met). The Series B Preferred Stock is redeemable for cash at the option of the holder at a specified redemption price, as defined, if certain events occur.
      The Series B preferred dividend for all such shares issued is set at the greater of $0.14 per share, or the prevailing common stock dividend plus, in the case of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock, an additional dividend of $0.05015 per share beginning January 1, 2009, if (i) the conversion of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock into Series B-1 Preferred Stock has not been completed and (ii) the price at which the common stock of the Company is then trading exceeds $10.07 per share.
      The $75.0 million preferred stock private placement is a two-stage transaction. The first tranche is for the sale of $20.0 million in Series B Preferred Stock. The initial $10.0 million funded on December 30, 2004, representing 993,049 shares of Series B-1 Preferred Stock. The issuance of the Series B-1 Preferred Stock on December 30, 2004 was effected in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The remaining $10.0 million of the first tranche will be available for disbursement by June 30, 2005. The second tranche is for the sale of $55.0 million in Series B Preferred Stock. Of the second tranche, $34.7 million can be funded, at the financial institution’s election, on June 30, 2005 if the Company has not given notice to the financial institution of its intent to sell $34.7 million of the second tranche by June 15, 2005. The remainder of the second tranche will be available for disbursement by December 23, 2005. Proceeds from the issuance of the initial 993,049 shares of Series B-1 Preferred Stock were used to partially fund a 21-property acquisition, which closed on March 16, 2005, and the Company will continue to sell preferred stock under this purchase agreement over time to fund general corporate purposes, new acquisitions, or debt repayment.
      Pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement, Security Capital has certain participation rights with respect to any sale of equity securities by us for consideration consisting solely of cash. Pursuant to this participation right and a result of the public common stock offering the Company completed in January 2005, the financial institution has the right to acquire up to 2,070,000 shares of our common stock at $9.139 per share. Security Capital may exercise its option to purchase these shares of common stock by delivering a written notice indicating such exercise no later than October 12, 2005, with the closing to occur on November 1, 2005. The shares of common stock to be sold to Security Capital upon the exercise of the option will be issued in a private placement transaction or, if certain conditions are satisfied, pursuant to the terms of a registration statement.
Stockholder Information
      As of March 14, 2005, we had approximately 9,300 holders of record of our common stock. In order to comply with certain requirements related to our qualification as a REIT, our charter limits the number of shares of capital stock that may be owned by any single person or affiliated group without our permission to 9.8% of the outstanding shares of any class of our capital stock. The Company’s Board of Directors has granted waivers to three stockholders allowing for such stockholders to exceed the ownership limitation.
Dividend Information
      To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we intend to make annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our taxable income (which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles). Distributions will be authorized by our board of directors and declared by us based upon a variety of factors deemed relevant by our directors, and no assurance can be given that our dividend policy will not change in the future. Our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders will depend, in part, upon our receipt of distributions from our operating partnership, which may depend upon receipt of lease payments with respect to our properties from the indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership, Ashford TRS, and, in turn, upon the management of our properties by Remington Lodging or other management companies.

33


Table of Contents

      On March 15, 2004, the Company declared a cash dividend of approximately $0.06 per diluted share, for stockholders of record on March 31, 2004, to be paid on April 15, 2004. On June 16, 2004, the Company declared a cash dividend of approximately $3.2 million, or $0.10 per diluted share, for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on June 30, 2004, which was paid July 15, 2004. On September 13, 2004, the Company declared a cash dividend of approximately $4.5 million, or $0.14 per diluted share, for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on September 30, 2004, which was paid October 15, 2004. On December 15, 2004, the Company declared a cash dividend of approximately $4.8 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on December 31, 2004, which was paid January 18, 2005.
Equity Compensation Plans Information
      The following table sets forth the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights; weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights; and the number of securities remaining available for future issuance as of December 31, 2004:
                           
    Number of Securities   Weighted-Average    
    to be Issued Upon   Exercise Price of    
    Exercise of Outstanding   Outstanding   Number of Securities
    Options, Warrants,   Options, Warrants,   Remaining Available
    and Rights   and Rights   for Future Issuance
             
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
                       
 
Restricted stock
    794,717       NA       736,964  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
    None       None       None  
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
      The following table sets forth consolidated selected historical operating and financial data for the Company beginning with its commencement of operations on August 29, 2003. Prior to that time, this table includes the combined selected historical operating and financial data of certain affiliates of Remington Hotel Corporation (the “Predecessor”).
      The selected historical consolidated and combined financial information as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 were derived from audited financial statements contained elsewhere herein. The selected historical combined financial information as of December 31, 2002 and for the year ended December 31, 2001 were derived from the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2003, which are included in the Company’s Form 10-K, filed March 29, 2004. The selected historical combined financial information as of December 31, 2001 and for the year ended December 31, 2000 were derived from the Company’s Post-Effective Amendment #1 to Form S-11 (file number 001-31775) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26, 2003. The selected historical combined balance sheet data as of December 31, 2000 was derived from unaudited financial statements. The unaudited historical combined financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which we consider necessary for a fair presentation of our financial condition as of such date under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
      The information below should be read along with all other financial information and analysis presented elsewhere herein, including the section captioned “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Company’s consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes thereto.

34


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
SECLECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
                                             
    Year Ended December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002   2001   2000
                     
    (Company)   (Company &   (Predecessor)   (Predecessor)   (Predecessor)
        Predecessor)            
Operating Data:
                                       
Revenue:
                                       
 
Hotel revenues
                                       
   
Rooms
  $ 89,798,311     $ 34,682,916     $ 28,529,640     $ 29,165,515     $ 24,654,910  
   
Food and beverage
    14,336,531       6,158,916       5,698,029       5,691,902       3,178,314  
   
Interest income from notes receivable
    7,549,445       110,000                    
   
Other
    5,240,775       1,326,769       1,130,112       1,358,229       1,470,000  
                               
 
Total Operating Revenue
    116,925,062       42,278,601       35,357,781       36,215,646       29,303,224  
Expenses:
                                       
 
Hotel operating expenses
                                       
   
Rooms
    20,907,848       8,113,097       6,461,721       6,260,660       5,763,985  
   
Food and beverage
    10,859,032       4,702,780       4,183,371       4,477,315       2,473,295  
   
Other direct
    2,150,404       900,621       621,693       608,350       661,351  
   
Indirect
    35,560,902       14,823,432       12,370,304       12,373,861       8,721,893  
   
Management fees, including related parties
    3,395,106       1,369,888       1,059,867       1,463,900       1,308,966  
 
Property taxes, insurance, and other
    6,654,858       2,858,050       2,437,482       2,197,404       1,558,545  
 
Depreciation & amortization
    10,767,785       4,932,676       4,833,551       4,446,486       3,249,308  
 
Corporate general and administrative:
                                       
   
Stock-based compensation
    2,397,130       864,452                    
   
Other corporate general and administrative
    9,457,814       3,138,498                    
                               
 
Total Operating Expenses
    102,150,879       41,703,494       31,967,989       31,827,976       23,737,343  
                               
 
Operating income
    14,774,183       575,107       3,389,792       4,387,670       5,565,881  
 
Interest income
    335,495       289,133       53,485       226,531       161,004  
 
Interest expense and amortization of loan costs
    (11,101,218 )     (5,000,206 )     (6,536,195 )     (7,520,694 )     (5,014,163 )
 
Write-off of loan costs
    (1,633,369 )                        
                               
 
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes and minority interest
    2,375,091       (4,135,966 )     (3,092,918 )     (2,906,493 )     712,722  
 
Provision for income taxes
    (658,273 )     (142,178 )                  
 
Minority interest
    (297,611 )     357,943                    
                               
 
Net Income (Loss)
    1,419,207       (3,920,201 )     (3,092,918 )     (2,906,493 )     712,722  
 
Preferred dividends
    (1,355,250 )                        
                               
 
Net Income (Loss) Available To Common Shareholders
  $ 63,957     $ (3,920,201 )   $ (3,092,918 )   $ (2,906,493 )   $ 712,722  
                               
 
Net Income (Loss) Per Share Available To Common Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2004, and from inception through December 31, 2003, respectively:
                                       
   
Basic and Diluted
  $ 0.00     $ (0.07 )                        
                               
 
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2004, and from inception through December 31, 2003, respectively:
                                       
   
Basic and Diluted
    25,120,653       24,627,298                          
                               

35


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Year Ended December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002   2001   2000
                     
    (Company)   (Company &   (Predecessor)   (Predecessor)   (Predecessor)
        Predecessor)            
Balance Sheet Data (2000 unaudited):
                                       
   
Investments in hotel properties, net
  $ 427,005,476     $ 173,723,998     $ 85,246,801     $ 88,874,078     $ 68,292,242  
   
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
    61,167,733       77,627,643       6,322,368       8,329,486       5,991,418  
   
Notes receivable
    79,661,549       10,000,000                    
   
Total assets
    595,944,837       267,882,417       95,416,446       100,001,305       77,046,232  
   
Indebtedness
    300,754,194       50,201,779       82,126,150       80,410,792       49,355,734  
   
Capital leases payable
    312,584       456,869       621,351       277,810       92,370  
   
Total liabilities
    327,925,885       57,943,496       86,105,492       84,684,368       53,836,084  
   
Total liabilities and owners’ equity
    595,944,837       267,882,417       95,416,446       100,001,305       77,046,232  
Other Data:
                                       
   
Cash Flow:
                                       
     
Provided by operating activities
  $ 6,651,442     $ 5,734,806     $ 622,734     $ 1,108,150     $ 4,870,739  
     
Used in investing activities
    (310,623,644 )     (89,188,930 )     (1,079,824 )     (24,899,286 )     (12,778,381 )
     
Provided by (used in) financing activities
    274,827,107       161,718,791       (1,726,457 )     24,921,233       8,315,129  
   
Unaudited:
                                       
     
Total number of rooms at December 31
    5,095       2,381       1,094       1,094       906  
     
Total number of hotels at December 31
    33       15       6       6       5  
     
EBITDA(1)
  $ 19,490,290     $ 5,449,268     $ 8,223,343     $ 8,834,156     $ 8,815,189  
     
FFO(2)
  $ 9,028,433     $ 647,287     $ 1,740,633     $ 1,539,993     $ 3,962,030  
 
(1) EBITDA Reconciliation (unaudited):
                                       
     
Net income (loss)
  $ 1,419,207     $ (3,920,201 )   $ (3,092,918 )   $ (2,906,493 )   $ 712,722  
     
Plus depreciation and amortization
    10,767,785       4,932,676       4,833,551       4,446,486       3,249,308  
     
Plus interest expense & amotization of loan costs
    11,101,218       5,000,206       6,536,195       7,520,694       5,014,163  
     
Less interest income
    (335,495 )     (289,133 )     (53,485 )     (226,531 )     (161,004 )
     
Plus provision for income taxes
    658,273       142,178                    
     
Remove minority interest
    297,611       (357,943 )                  
                               
       
Gross EBITDA
    23,908,599       5,507,783       8,223,343       8,834,156       8,815,189  
     
EBITDA related to minority interest
    4,418,309       58,515                    
                               
       
EBITDA
  $ 19,490,290     $ 5,449,268     $ 8,223,343     $ 8,834,156     $ 8,815,189  
                               
 
(2) FFO Reconciliation (unaudited):
                                       
     
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
  $ 63,957     $ (3,920,201 )   $ (3,092,918 )   $ (2,906,493 )   $ 712,722  
   
(a) Plus real estate depreciation and amortization
    10,713,546       4,930,796       4,833,551       4,446,486       3,249,308  
     
Remove minority interest
    297,611       (357,943 )                  
                               
       
Gross FFO
  $ 11,075,114       652,652       1,740,633       1,539,993       3,962,030  
     
FFO related to minority interest
    2,046,681       5,365                    
                               
       
FFO
  $ 9,028,433     $ 647,287     $ 1,740,633     $ 1,539,993     $ 3,962,030  
                               
 
(a) Includes property-level furniture, fixtures, and equipment.
 
(1) EBITDA is defined as operating income (loss) or income (loss) before net gain on sale of properties, interest expense, interest income (excluding interest income from mezzanine loans), income taxes, and

36


Table of Contents

depreciation and amortization. We believe EBITDA is useful to investors as an indicator of our ability to service debt and pay cash distributions. EBITDA, as calculated by us, may not be comparable to EBITDA reported by other companies that do not define EBITDA exactly as we define the term. EBITDA does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), and should not be considered as an alternative to operating income or net income determined in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of performance or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as an indicator of liquidity.
 
(2) The White Paper on Funds From Operations (“FFO”) approved by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) in April 2002 defines FFO as net income (loss) computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of properties and extraordinary items as defined by GAAP, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and net of adjustments for the portion of these items related to unconsolidated entities and joint ventures. NAREIT developed FFO as a relative measure of performance of an equity REIT to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the basis determined by GAAP. We compute FFO in accordance with our interpretation of standards established by NAREIT, which may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the NAREIT definition differently than us. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities as determined by GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to a) GAAP net income (loss) as an indication of our financial performance or b) GAAP cash flows from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of cash available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions. We believe that to facilitate a clear understanding of our historical operating results, FFO should be considered along with our net income (loss) and cash flows reported in the consolidated financial statements.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
      The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein. This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (the “Company” or “we” or “our”) cautions investors that any forward-looking statements presented herein, or which management may make orally or in writing from time to time, are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions at that time. Throughout this report, words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “result,” and other similar expressions, which do not relate solely to historical matters, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance, which may be affected by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties, and factors beyond our control. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated, or projected. We caution investors that while forward-looking statements reflect our good-faith beliefs at the time such statements are made, said statements are not guarantees of future performance and are impacted by actual events that occur after such statements are made. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward-looking statements, which were based on results and trends at the time those statements were made, to anticipate future results or trends.
      Some of the risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, among others, those discussed herein under the heading “Rick Factors.” These risks and uncertainties continue to be relevant to our performance and financial condition. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment where new risk factors emerge from time to time. It is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any

37


Table of Contents

forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.
Executive Overview
      We are a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that commenced operations upon completion of our initial public offering (“IPO”) and related formation transactions on August 29, 2003. As of December 31, 2004, we owned 33 hotels, approximately $79.7 million of mezzanine loans receivable, and eight asset management and consulting contracts. Six of these hotels were contributed upon our formation, nine of these hotels were acquired in the fourth quarter of 2003, and 18 of these hotels were acquired at various times throughout 2004. All of the loans receivable were originated or acquired since November 26, 2003. The 27 hotel properties acquired since our formation contributed approximately $70.4 million and $11.6 million to our total revenue and operating income, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2004, and approximately $6.1 million and $459,000 to our total revenue and operating income, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2003.
      Based on our primary business objectives and forecasted operating conditions, our key priorities or financial strategies include, among other things:
  •  acquiring hotels with a favorable current yield with an opportunity for appreciation,
 
  •  implementing selective capital improvements designed to increase profitability and directing our managers to minimize operating costs and increase revenues,
 
  •  originating or acquiring mezzanine loans, and
 
  •  other investments that our Board deems appropriate.
      We believe the lodging industry was negatively affected in 2003 by low levels of business travel resulting from a weak economy (predominantly in the first half of the year), the war in Iraq, continued changes in terrorist threat levels, and travel reductions and restrictions related to severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS. However, in 2004, strong economic growth in the United States economy combined with improved business demand led to the strong RevPar growth throughout the lodging industry.
      In 2005, forecasts for the lodging industry continue to be favorable as U.S. Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) is forecast to continue to expand. We feel there will be some final “unwinding” of suppressed business travel from the low levels experienced in 2002 and 2003 that will generate increases in business demand.
Results of Operations
      RevPAR is a commonly used measure within the hotel industry to evaluate hotel operations. RevPAR is defined as the product of the average daily room rate (“ADR”) charged and the average daily occupancy achieved. RevPAR does not include revenues from food and beverage or parking, telephone, or other guest services generated by the property. Although RevPAR does not include these ancillary revenues, it is generally considered the leading indicator of core revenues for many hotels. We also use RevPAR to compare the results of our hotels between periods and to analyze results of our comparable hotels. Increases in RevPAR attributable to increases in occupancy are generally accompanied by increases in most categories of variable operating costs. Increases in RevPAR attributable to increases in ADR are accompanied by increases in limited categories of operating costs, such as management fees and franchise fees.

38


Table of Contents

      The following table illustrates the key performance indicators for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, for our initial properties (“comparable hotels”), which represents the six hotels we’ve owned throughout the three years presented:
                           
    Year Ended December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002
             
Consolidated (initial properties)
                       
 
Room revenues
  $ 31,025,537     $ 29,391,266     $ 28,529,640  
 
RevPAR
  $ 77.49     $ 73.61     $ 71.45  
 
Occupancy
    70.15 %     70.87 %     65.98 %
 
ADR
  $ 110.46     $ 103.86     $ 108.29  
Embassy Suites (initial properties)
                       
 
Room revenues
  $ 23,302,327     $ 21,596,051     $ 21,404,050  
 
RevPAR
  $ 95.03     $ 88.31     $ 87.52  
 
Occupancy
    76.03 %     76.31 %     73.55 %
 
ADR
  $ 124.99     $ 115.73     $ 119.00  
Radisson Hotels (initial properties)
                       
 
Room revenues
  $ 7,723,210     $ 7,795,215     $ 7,125,590  
 
RevPAR
  $ 49.77     $ 50.37     $ 46.04  
 
Occupancy
    60.86 %     62.28 %     54.01 %
 
ADR
  $ 81.78     $ 80.87     $ 85.24  
      The consolidated and combined financial information presented herein includes all of the accounts of the Company beginning with its commencement of operations on August 29, 2003. Prior to that time, this report includes the combined financial information of certain affiliates of Remington Hotel Corporation (the “Predecessor”).
      The following table reflects key line items from our consolidated and combined statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002:
                                         
        Company &       Company &    
    The Company   Predecessor       Predecessor    
            Favorable       Favorable
    Year Ended   Year Ended   (Unfavorable)   Year Ended   (Unfavorable)
    December 31,   December 31,   Change 2003 to   December 31,   Change 2002
    2004   2003   2004   2002   to 2003
                     
Total revenue
  $ 116,925,062     $ 42,278,601     $ 74,646,461     $ 35,357,781     $ 6,920,820  
Total hotel expenses
    72,873,292       29,909,818       (42,963,474 )     24,696,956       5,212,862  
Property taxes, insurance, and other
    6,654,858       2,858,050       (3,796,808 )     2,437,482       420,568  
Depreciation and amortization
    10,767,785       4,932,676       (5,835,109 )     4,833,551       99,125  
Corporate general and administrative
    11,854,944       4,002,950       (7,851,994 )           4,002,950  
Operating income
    14,774,183       575,107       14,199,076       3,389,792       (2,814,685 )
Interest income
    335,495       289,133       46,362       53,485       235,648  
Interest expense
    (9,217,377 )     (4,599,512 )     (4,617,865 )     (5,715,229 )     1,115,717  
Amortization of loan costs
    (1,883,841 )     (400,694 )     (1,483,147 )     (820,966 )     420,272  
Write-off of loan costs
    (1,633,369 )           (1,633,369 )            
Provision for income taxes
    (658,273 )     (142,178 )     (516,095 )           (142,178 )
Minority interest
    (297,611 )     357,943       (655,554 )           357,943  
Net income (loss)
  $ 1,419,207     $ (3,920,201 )   $ 5,339,408     $ (3,092,918 )   $ (827,283 )

39


Table of Contents

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2004 to Year Ended December 31, 2003
      Revenue. Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased to approximately $116.9 million, an increase of approximately $74.6 million or 176.6% from total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003 of approximately $42.3 million. The increase was primarily due to approximately $64.3 million of incremental revenues attributable to the acquisitions of nine hotel properties in the fourth quarter of 2003 and 18 hotel properties at various times throughout 2004, as well as approximately $7.5 million of interest income earned on the Company’s $79.7 million mezzanine loans receivable portfolio, all of which was acquired or originated since November 26, 2003. In addition, revenues for comparable hotels increased due to increases in both room revenues and food and beverage revenues.
      Room revenues at comparable hotels for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased approximately $1.6 million or 5.6% compared to 2003 due to an increase in RevPAR from $73.61 to $77.49, which consisted of a 6.4% increase in ADR offset slightly by a 1.0% decrease in occupancy. Due to the continued recovery in the economy and consistent with industry trends, several hotels experienced increases in ADR. In particular, the Las Vegas and Dulles markets recovered significantly, and the two Embassy Suites at these locations performed accordingly. However, occupancy decreased significantly at the Holtsville Radisson due to substantial group sales related to certain customers during 2003 that did not recur in 2004 and new area competition, which primarily generated the overall slight decline in occupancy at comparable hotels.
      Food and beverage revenues at comparable hotels for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased approximately $115,000 or 2.1% compared to 2003. Although occupancy declined slightly overall, food and beverage revenues increased as certain hotels experienced an increase in banquets or group sales, which generated higher food and beverage revenues.
      Other revenues at comparable hotels for the year ended December 31, 2004 were virtually flat compared to 2003.
      Interest income from notes receivable increased to approximately $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to approximately $110,000 for 2003 due to substantial growth in the mezzanine loans receivable portfolio to approximately $79.7 million at December 31, 2004, all of which was acquired or originated since November 2003.
      Asset management fees increased to approximately $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to approximately $137,000 for 2003 due to the eight asset management and consulting contracts acquired from an affiliate upon formation of the Company on August 29, 2003.
      Hotel Operating Expenses. Hotel operating expenses, which consist of room expense, food and beverage expense, other direct expenses, indirect expenses, and management fees, increased approximately $43.0 million or 143.6% for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to 2003, primarily due to approximately $42.2 million of incremental expenses associated with the 27 hotel properties acquired since the third quarter of 2003. In addition, hotel operating expenses at comparable hotels experienced an increase of approximately $723,000 or 2.8% for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to 2003, primarily due to increases in rooms expense and indirect expense, partially offset by a decrease in food and beverage expense.
      Rooms expense at comparable hotels increased approximately $478,000 or 7.1% for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to 2003 primarily due to increased occupancy at certain hotels and virtually flat costs at hotels experiencing comparable or decreased occupancy due to the fixed nature of maintaining staff. Food and beverage expense at comparable hotels for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to 2003 decreased slightly, which is consistent with the overall decrease in occupancy. Indirect expenses at comparable hotels increased approximately $301,000 or 2.4% for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to 2003. Indirect expenses increased as a result of:
  •  increased sales and marketing expenses due to increased headcount and marketing budget at certain hotels,
 
  •  increased repairs and maintenance expenses due to miscellaneous repairs incurred at certain hotels,

40


Table of Contents

  •  increased franchise fees due to increased room revenues at certain hotels, and
 
  •  increased energy costs due to increased utility rates.
      Property Taxes, Insurance, and Other. Property taxes, insurance, and other increased approximately $3.8 million or 132.8% for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to 2003, due to approximately $4.1 million of incremental expenses associated with the 27 hotel properties acquired since the third quarter of 2003, which includes approximately $160,000 of uninsured losses related to hurricane and fire damage experienced at certain of these hotels. Aside from costs incurred at the additional hotels acquired, property taxes, insurance, and other decreased during the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to 2003, primarily due to decreased insurance rates.
      Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased approximately $5.8 million or 118.3% for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to 2003, due to approximately $6.8 million of incremental depreciation associated with the 27 hotel properties acquired since the third quarter of 2003. Aside from the additional hotels acquired, depreciation and amortization decreased for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to 2003 as a result of certain assets becoming fully depreciated.
      Corporate General and Administrative. Corporate general and administrative expense increased to approximately $11.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to approximately $4.0 for 2003 as a result of the annual impact of ongoing expenses associated with becoming a publicly-traded company on August 29, 2003, including salaries, payroll taxes, benefits, insurance, stock-based compensation related to employee stock grants, audit fees, and directors fees. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the total includes approximately $2.4 million of non-cash expenses associated with the amortization of employee stock grants, approximately $210,000 of offering costs associated with a public offering that was subsequently postponed, and approximately $596,000 of nonrecurring implementation costs associated with Sarbanes-Oxley internal controls documentation requirements. For the year ended December 31, 2003, the total includes approximately $864,000 of non-cash expenses associated with the amortization of employee stock grants.
      Operating Income. Operating income increased approximately $14.2 million to approximately $14.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 from approximately $575,000 million for 2003 as a result of the aforementioned operating results.
      Interest Income. Interest income increased approximately $46,000 to approximately $335,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004 from approximately $289,000 for 2003, primarily due to interest earned on funds remaining from the Company’s IPO and funds received from subsequent borrowings during 2004 in excess of interest earned on IPO funds held between August 29, 2003 and December 31, 2003.
      Interest Expense and Amortization of Loan Costs. Interest expense and amortization of loan costs increased approximately $6.1 million to approximately $11.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 from approximately $5.0 million for 2003. The increase in interest expense and amortization of loan costs is associated with the significantly higher average debt balance during 2004 compared to 2003.
      Write-off of Loan Costs. On September 2, 2004, the Company executed a $210.0 million term loan, and used the proceeds to repay three mortgage notes payable totaling approximately $57.8 million, pay down its $60.0 million secured credit facility by approximately $57.2 million, and pay down another mortgage note payable by approximately $12.6 million. Unamortized loan costs associated with the repaid mortgage notes was approximately $1.6 million, which was expensed.
      Provision for Income Taxes. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal corporate income tax on that portion of its net income that does not relate to taxable REIT subsidiaries. However, the Company leases each of its hotel properties to Ashford TRS, which is treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary for federal income tax purposes. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company recognized a provision for income taxes related to Ashford TRS of approximately $658,000 compared to approximately $142,000 recognized for 2003.
      Minority Interest. Minority interest was a reduction to net income (loss) of approximately $298,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to an increase to net income (loss) of approximately $358,000 in

41


Table of Contents

2003. Upon formation of the Company on August 29, 2003, minority interest in the operating partnership was established to represent the limited partners’ proportionate share of the equity in the operating partnership. Net income (loss) is allocated to minority interest based on the weighted-average limited partnership percentage ownership throughout the period.
      Net Income (Loss). Net income (loss) was approximately $1.4 million of net income for the year ended December 31, 2004 and approximately $3.9 million of net loss for the year ended December 31, 2003, which represents a net income increase of approximately $5.3 million as a result of the aforementioned operating results.
      Preferred Dividends. On December 17, 2004, the Company declared a cash dividend of approximately $1.4 million, or $0.5878 per diluted share, for Series A preferred shareholders of record on December 31, 2004, which was paid January 18, 2005. In addition, the Company recognized Series B preferred stock dividends of approximately $3,300 related to its Series B preferred stock issued on December 30, 2004. In 2003, no preferred stock existed.
      Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders. Net income (loss) available to common shareholders was approximately $64,000 of net income for the year ended December 31, 2004 and approximately $3.9 million of net loss for the year ended December 31, 2003, which represents a net income increase of approximately $4.0 million as a result of the aforementioned operating results.
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2003 to Year Ended December 31, 2002
      Revenue. Total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2003 increased approximately $6.9 million or 19.6% from total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2002, primarily due to approximately $6.1 million in revenues attributable to the acquisitions of five hotel properties on October 8, 2003 and four hotel properties on November 25, 2003, as well as approximately $110,000 of interest earned on the Company’s $10 million mezzanine loan receivable, which was acquired November 26, 2003. In addition, revenues for comparable hotels increased due to increased room revenues, partially offset by decreased food and beverage revenues and decreased other revenues. Room revenues at comparable hotels increased 3.0% due to an increase in RevPAR to $73.61 for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to $71.45 for 2002, which consisted of a 7.4% increase in occupancy and a 4.1% decrease in ADR.
      Room revenues at comparable hotels for the year ended December 31, 2003 increased approximately $862,000 or 3.0% compared to 2002, primarily due to the aforementioned increase in occupancy offset somewhat by a decrease in ADR. Both the Covington Radisson and Las Vegas Embassy Suites experienced increases in occupancy due to an enhanced focus on weekend group sales. In addition, occupancy increased at the Dulles Embassy Suites due to a recovery in that marketplace, which had suffered a downturn following the September 11, 2001 terrorist events. The Holtsville Radisson also experienced an increase in occupancy, somewhat offset by a decrease in ADR, as a result of significant military business utilizing discounted rates in the latter half of the year. These occupancy increases were offset by a decrease in occupancy and ADR at both the Dallas and Austin Embassy Suites due to a downturn in the Texas economy, which is heavily dependent on business in the high-tech and telecom sectors.
      Food and beverage revenues at comparable hotels for the year ended December 31, 2003 decreased approximately $130,000 or 2.3% compared to 2002. Food and beverage revenues decreased at both the Dulles Embassy Suites and Dallas Embassy Suites due to higher than usual banquet revenues experienced in 2002 that did not recur in 2003. In addition, food and beverage revenues were down at both the Dallas and Austin Embassy Suites due to the aforementioned decreases in occupancy. Food and beverage revenues also decreased at the Covington Radisson due to a shift in customer mix toward airline crews, who utilize food and beverage facilities to a lesser extent than other business travelers.
      Other revenues at comparable hotels for the year ended December 31, 2003 decreased approximately $175,000 or 15.5% compared to 2002, primarily due to a decrease in telephone revenues as customers shifted from in-room phones to cellular phones.

42


Table of Contents

      Asset management fees increased to approximately $137,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to zero for 2002 due to the eight asset management and consulting contracts acquired from an affiliate upon formation of the Company on August 29, 2003. On October 16, 2003, the Company exercised its option to reassign its rights under its eight asset management and consulting contracts back to the affiliate until January 1, 2004 in order to meet REIT eligible-income thresholds in 2003. As a result, the Company did not collect related asset management fee income in 2003 of approximately $250,000. However, the related guarantee of payment associated with these fees was extended for a like period.
      Hotel Operating Expenses. Hotel operating expenses, which consist of room expense, food and beverage expense, other direct expenses, indirect expenses, and management fees, increased approximately $5.2 million or 21.1% for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to 2002, primarily due to approximately $4.5 million of expenses associated with the nine hotel properties acquired in the fourth quarter of 2003. In addition, hotel operating expenses at comparable hotels experienced increases in room expense, food and beverage expense, other direct expenses, and indirect expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to 2002.
      Room expense at comparable hotels increased approximately 4.8% for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to variable costs associated with the aforementioned overall increase in occupancy as well as increased payroll costs. Over the same comparative period, food and beverage expense at comparable hotels increased approximately 1.0% due to rising food and payroll costs. Other direct expenses at comparable hotels increased approximately 25.8% for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to increased payroll and telephone usage rates. Indirect expenses at comparable hotels increased approximately $155,000 or 1.3% for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to 2002. Indirect expenses increased due to:
  •  increased repairs and maintenance expense at the Dallas Embassy Suites and Austin Embassy Suites due to improvements in 2003 that did not occur in 2002, offset by decreased repairs and maintenance expense at the Las Vegas Embassy Suites, Covington Radisson, and Holtsville Radisson due to improvement programs in effect in 2002 that did not recur in 2003;
 
  •  increased energy costs due to the air conditioning system running inefficiently during a portion of 2003 at the Austin Embassy Suites, increased usage at the Covington Radisson due to increased occupancy, and a colder 2003 winter at the Holtsville Radisson;
 
  •  increased general and administrative fees due to increased payroll in 2003; and
 
  •  increased franchise fees due to increased room revenues at the Dulles Embassy Suites, Las Vegas Embassy Suites, Covington Radisson, and Holtsville Radisson, as well as increased rates at certain hotels.
      Property taxes, insurance, and other. Property taxes, insurance, and other increased approximately $421,000 or 17.3% for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to 2002, due to approximately $461,000 of expenses associated with the nine hotel properties acquired in the fourth quarter of 2003. Aside from the additional hotels acquired, property taxes, insurance, and other incurred in 2003 was consistent with 2002.
      Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased approximately $99,000 or 2.1% for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to 2002, due to approximately $593,000 of depreciation associated with the nine hotel properties acquired in the fourth quarter of 2003. Aside from the additional hotels acquired, depreciation and amortization decreased in 2003 compared to 2002 as a result of certain assets becoming fully depreciated.
      Corporate general and administrative. Corporate general and administrative expense increased to approximately $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to zero for 2002 as a result of expenses associated with being a newly-formed, publicly-traded company, including salaries, payroll taxes, benefits, insurance, stock-based compensation related to employee stock grants, audit fees, and directors fees. For 2003, the total includes approximately $864,000 of non-cash expenses associated with the amortization of employee stock grants.

43


Table of Contents

      Operating Income. Operating income decreased approximately $2.8 million from $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 to approximately $575,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 as a result of the aforementioned operating results.
      Interest Income. Interest income increased approximately $236,000 from approximately $53,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002 to approximately $289,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003, primarily due to interest earned on funds received from the Company’s initial public offering.
      Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased approximately $1.5 million from approximately $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 to approximately $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. Upon completion of the Company’s initial public offering and related formation transactions on August 29, 2003, the Company repaid the majority of its mortgage notes payable. The decrease in interest expense is associated with the lower debt balance.
      Provision for income taxes. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal corporate income tax on that portion of its net income that does not relate to taxable REIT subsidiaries. However, the Company leases each of its hotel properties to Ashford TRS, which is treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary for federal income tax purposes. For the period from inception through December 31, 2003, we recognized a provision for income taxes of approximately $142,000 related to Ashford TRS.
      Minority Interest. Minority interest increased to approximately $358,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to zero for 2002. Upon formation of the Company on August 29, 2003, minority interest in the operating partnership was established to represent the limited partners’ proportionate share of the equity in the operating partnership. Net income (loss) is allocated to minority interest based on the weighted average limited partnership percentage ownership throughout the period.
      Net Loss. Net loss was approximately $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and approximately $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, which represents a net loss increase of approximately $827,000 or 26.7% as a result of the aforementioned operating results.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
      Our principal source of funds to meet our cash requirements, including distributions to stockholders, will be our share of the operating partnership’s cash flow. The operating partnership’s principal sources of revenue include: (i) cash flow from hotel operations, (ii) interest income from our mezzanine loans receivable portfolio, and (iii) management fees related to our eight asset management and consulting contracts with an affiliate.
      Cash flow from hotel operations is subject to all operating risks common to the hotel industry, including:
  •  Competition for guests from other hotels;
 
  •  Adverse effects of general and local economic conditions;
 
  •  Dependence on demand from business and leisure travelers, which may fluctuate and be seasonal;
 
  •  Increases in energy costs, airline fares, and other expenses related to travel, which may deter traveling;
 
  •  Increases in operating costs related to inflation and other factors, including wages, benefits, insurance, and energy;
 
  •  Overbuilding in the hotel industry, especially in particular markets; and
 
  •  Actual or threatened acts of terrorism and actions taken against terrorists, which often cause public concern about travel safety.
      During the year ended December 31, 2004, we completed the following significant transactions, which impacted or will impact our cash flow and liquidity:
        On January 23, 2004, we acquired a $15.0 million subordinated first-mortgage loan receivable related to a hotel property in Denver, Colorado. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 9%, matures in

44


Table of Contents

  January 2006, and provides for three one-year extension options subject to certain conditions. In accordance with the loan agreement, we will receive interest-only payments through maturity, with principal and interest paid through the extension periods based on a twenty-five-year amortization schedule. Prepayments of the loan require decreasing prepayment premiums through August 31, 2005, and require no prepayment premiums thereafter. We used proceeds from our IPO as well as proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
 
        On February 5, 2004, we executed a $60.0 million secured credit facility, at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.25%, of which approximately $49.8 million of the proceeds were funded March 24, 2004 and the remainder was funded May 17, 2004. The credit facility matures in three years, was initially collateralized by eight hotel properties, is subject to certain financial covenants, requires a commitment fee of 0.45% to 0.55% on the unused portion of the line, which is payable quarterly, and allows for an increase to $75.0 million subject to certain conditions of the lender. On August 17, 2004, we modified the terms of this credit facility, as discussed below.
 
        On March 4, 2004, we acquired a $25.0 million mezzanine loan receivable secured by 17 hotel properties. The mezzanine loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 8.7% with a 2.5% LIBOR floor, matures in July 2005, and provides for three one-year extension options subject to certain conditions. In accordance with the loan agreement, we will receive principal and interest payments through the extension periods based on a twenty-five-year amortization schedule. Prepayments of the loan are prohibited through maturity subject to certain provisions. We used proceeds from our IPO as well as proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition. Prior to December 31, 2004, we received payments of approximately $8.1 million related to the portion of this mezzanine loan that was secured by three hotel properties. As a result, the $25.0 million mezzanine loan, originally secured by 17 hotel properties, became a $16.9 million mezzanine loan, secured by 14 hotel properties.
 
        On March 15, 2004, we declared a cash dividend of approximately $1.9 million, or $0.06 per diluted share, for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on March 31, 2004, which was paid April 15, 2004.
 
        On March 19, 2004, we originated a $15.0 million mezzanine loan receivable related to a hotel property in Boston, Massachusetts. The mezzanine loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 10.25% with a 1.75% LIBOR floor and a 5% LIBOR cap, matures in March 2007, and provides for two one-year extension options subject to certain conditions. In accordance with the loan agreement, we will receive interest-only payments through maturity. Prepayments of the loan are prohibited through September 1, 2005. We used proceeds from our IPO as well as proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
 
        On March 24, 2004, we acquired a $6.6 million mezzanine loan receivable related to a hotel property in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. The mezzanine loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 10% with a 2% LIBOR floor and a 5% LIBOR cap and matures in January 2006. In accordance with the loan agreement, we will receive interest-only payments through maturity. In addition, we will receive an additional interest payment upon maturity based on an accrual rate of the greater of 15% or LIBOR plus 13% with a 2% LIBOR floor. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
 
        On March 24, 2004, we acquired a hotel property in Lake Buena Vista, Florida, from JHM Ruby Lake Hotel, Ltd. for approximately $25.6 million in cash. Annualized revenue of the acquired hotel is approximately $5.8 million. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
 
        On April 1, 2004, we acquired a hotel property in Atlantic Beach, Florida, from Huron Jacksonville Limited Partnership for approximately $23.1 million, which consisted of approximately $6.3 million in cash, approximately $15.7 million in assumed mortgage debt, and approximately $1.1 million worth of limited partnership units, which equates to 106,675 units based on the market price of our common stock on the date of issuance. Annualized revenue of the acquired hotel is approximately $9.1 million. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
 
        On May 17, 2004, we acquired a hotel property in Baltimore, Maryland, from The Buccini/ Pollin Group for approximately $15.9 million, which included approximately $9.1 million in cash and

45


Table of Contents

  approximately $6.8 million in assumed mortgage debt, which matures April 1, 2011. On August 12, 2004, we increased this debt commitment by approximately $5.2 million and reduced the overall interest rate from the average weekly yield for 30-day commercial paper plus 3.5% to the average weekly yield for 30-day commercial paper plus 3.4%. Annualized revenue of the acquired hotel is approximately $3.9 million. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
 
        On June 16, 2004, we declared a cash dividend of approximately $3.2 million, or $0.10 per diluted share, for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on June 30, 2004, which was paid July 15, 2004.
 
        On July 7, 2004, we acquired a hotel property and adjacent office building in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from Household OPEB I, Inc. for approximately $16.7 million in cash. Annualized revenue of the acquired hotel is approximately $9.0 million, while the adjacent office building has one tenant with nominal operations. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
 
        On July 7, 2004, we executed a $14.8 million mortgage note payable, secured by one hotel property, at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.5%, with a 5% total floor. The mortgage note payable had a maturity date of July 31, 2007 with two one-year extension options, with interest-only payments due monthly plus principal payments of $20,000 due monthly beginning July 1, 2006. Upon completion of the $210.0 million term loan on September 2, 2004, as discussed below, this mortgage note payable was repaid. The balance outstanding at the time the loan was repaid was approximately $9.7 million.
 
        On July 14, 2004, we executed a $45.6 million credit facility, with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 6.25% with a 2% LIBOR floor, which matures July 13, 2007. Approximately $37.5 million of the proceeds were funded immediately. Prior to December 31, 2004, we paid down approximately $5.1 million of this credit facility in connection with partial payoffs of one of the mezzanine notes receivable securing the facility.
 
        On July 23, 2004, we acquired four hotel properties from Day Hospitality Group for approximately $25.9 million in cash plus approximately $86,000 in additional cash to be paid no later than April 30, 2005 pursuant to a post-acquisition contingency. Annualized revenues of these four hotel properties are approximately $7.8 million. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund the acquisition of these properties.
 
        On July 23, 2004, we executed a $19.6 million mortgage note payable, with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.5% with a 5% total floor, which matures July 31, 2007. Upon completion of the $210.0 million term loan on September 2, 2004, as discussed below, this mortgage note payable was paid down by approximately $12.6 million.
 
        On August 17, 2004, we modified our $60.0 million credit facility such that the interest rate was reduced from LIBOR plus 3.25% to LIBOR plus a range of 2.0% to 2.3% depending on the loan-to-value ratio, and maturity was extended from February 5, 2007 to August 17, 2007, with two one-year extension options.
 
        On August 20, 2004, we received an approximate $7.2 million payment related to the portion of our $25.0 million mezzanine loan that was secured by two hotel properties. As a result of this prepayment, the $25.0 million mezzanine loan, originally secured by 17 hotel properties, became a $17.8 million mezzanine loan, secured by 15 hotel properties.
 
        On September 2, 2004, we executed a $210.0 million term loan, at varying interest rates averaging LIBOR plus 1.95%, with interest-only payments due monthly. We used the proceeds to repay three mortgage notes payable totaling approximately $57.8 million (with interest rates ranging from LIBOR plus 3.25% to LIBOR plus 3.5%), pay down our $60.0 million secured credit facility (interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.25%) by approximately $57.2 million, and pay down another mortgage note payable by approximately $12.6 million (interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.5%).
 
        On September 2, 2004, we acquired nine hotel properties from Dunn Hospitality Group for approximately $62.0 million, which consisted of approximately $59.0 million in cash and approximately

46


Table of Contents

  $3.0 million worth of limited partnership units, which equates to 333,333 units based on the market price of our common stock on the date of issuance. Annualized revenues of these nine hotel properties are approximately $20.1 million. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund the acquisition of these properties.
 
        On September 10, 2004, we acquired an $11.0 million mezzanine loan receivable related to a hotel property in Westminster, Colorado. The mezzanine loan bears interest at 14% and matures in September 2011. In accordance with the loan agreement, we will receive interest-only payments through maturity. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
 
        On September 13, 2004, we declared a cash dividend of approximately $4.5 million, or $0.14 per diluted share, for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on September 30, 2004, which was paid October 15, 2004.
 
        On September 22, 2004, we issued 2,300,000 shares of 8.55% Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock at $25 per share, which generated gross proceeds of approximately $57.5 million. However, our aggregate proceeds, net of underwriters’ discount and offering costs, was approximately $55.0 million.
 
        On September 30, 2004, we originated a $10.0 million first-mortgage loan receivable related to a hotel property in Denver, Colorado, which bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.8%. Also on September 30, 2004, we originated a $5.0 million mezzanine loan receivable related to the same hotel property in Denver, Colorado, which bears interest at LIBOR plus 11.35%. Both loans mature October 2006. In accordance with the loan agreements, we will receive interest-only payments through maturity. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund these originations.
 
        On October 1, 2004, we acquired the Hyatt Orange County hotel in Anaheim, California, from Atrium Plaza, LLC for approximately $81.0 million in cash, inclusive of the seller’s commitment to fund a $6.0 million renovation, which was completed in December 2004. Annualized revenue of the acquired hotel is approximately $27.8 million. We used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
 
        On October 1, 2004, in connection with the acquisition of a hotel property, we drew an additional $15.0 million on our $60.0 million credit facility.
 
        On December 9, 2004, we sold our $10 million first-mortgage loan receivable, secured by one hotel property, with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.8%, maturing in October 2006, at its par value.
 
        On December 15, 2004, we declared a cash dividend of approximately $4.8 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on December 31, 2004, which was paid January 18, 2005.
 
        On December 17, 2004, we declared a cash dividend of approximately $1.4 million, or $0.5878 per diluted share, for Series A preferred shareholders of record on December 31, 2004, which was paid January 18, 2005.
 
        On December 30, 2004, we issued 993,049 shares of Series B-1 Preferred Stock at $10.07 per share, which generated proceeds of approximately $10.0 million.

      Net Cash Flow Provided By Operating Activities. For the year ended December 31, 2004, net cash flow provided by operating activities increased approximately $1.0 million from cash flow provided of approximately $5.7 million for 2003 to cash flow provided of approximately $6.7 million for 2004. The increase in net cash flow provided by operating activities was primarily attributable to an increase in net income experienced in 2004, which resulted from improved operations at the six comparable hotels as well as the 27 hotels acquired since October 2003. These increases were partially offset by the timing of operational payments.
      Net Cash Flow Used In Investing Activities. For the year ended December 31, 2004, net cash flow used in investing activities was approximately $310.6 million, which consisted of approximately $87.8 million of acquisitions or originations of mezzanine and first-mortgage loans receivable, approximately $226.7 million related to the acquisitions of 18 hotel properties, and approximately $14.2 million of improvements to various hotel properties, which is consistent with capital improvements anticipated for such properties upon

47


Table of Contents

acquisition, offset by approximately $18.1 million of payments on notes receivable. For the year ended December 31, 2003, net cash flow used in investing activities was approximately $89.2 million, which consisted of $10.0 million related to the acquisition of a mezzanine loan receivable, approximately $78.6 million related to the acquisitions of nine hotel properties, and approximately $411,000 of improvements to various hotel properties.
      Net Cash Flow Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities. For the year ended December 31, 2004, net cash flow provided by financing activities was approximately $274.8 million, the majority of which relates to approximately $361.3 million of borrowings on indebtedness, including the $210.0 million term loan executed on September 2, 2004, approximately $55.0 million of proceeds received related to the Series A preferred stock offering on September 22, 2004, and approximately $10.0 million of proceeds received related to the Series B preferred stock issuance on December 30, 2004, offset by repayments of three mortgage notes payable totaling approximately $57.8 million, pay down of the $60.0 million secured credit facility by approximately $57.2 million, pay down of another mortgage note payable by approximately $12.6 million, pay down of the $45.6 million credit facility by approximately $5.1 million, dividend payments of approximately $9.5 million, and payments of deferred financing costs of approximately $8.5 million. For the year ended December 31, 2003, net cash provided by financing activities of approximately $161.7 million primarily relates to net cash received associated with our IPO and related formation transactions on August 29, 2003 and approximately $27.8 million of borrowings on indebtedness on December 24, 2003. Proceeds from the IPO and subsequent sale of over-allotment shares to our underwriters was approximately $218.0 million, and proceeds from the sale of shares to our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman was approximately $4.2 million. These proceeds were offset by cash paid upon our formation of approximately $4.9 million, payments of indebtedness of approximately $62.8 million, and payments of offering costs of approximately $18.2 million. Prior to the IPO, net cash distributions to the Predecessor’s owners were approximately $1.1 million.
      In general, we are focused exclusively on investing in the hospitality industry across all segments, including direct hotel investments, first mortgages, mezzanine loans, and sale-leaseback transactions. We intend to acquire and, in the appropriate market conditions, develop additional hotels and provide structured financings to owners of lodging properties. We may incur indebtedness to fund any such acquisitions, developments, or financings. We may also incur indebtedness to meet distribution requirements imposed on REITs under the Internal Revenue Code to the extent that working capital and cash flow from our investments are insufficient to make the required distributions.
      However, no assurances can be given that we will obtain additional financings or, if we do, what the amount and terms will be. Our failure to obtain future financing under favorable terms could adversely impact our ability to execute on our business strategy. In addition, we may selectively pursue mortgage financing on individual properties and our mortgage investments.
      We will acquire or develop additional hotels and invest in structured financings only as suitable opportunities arise, and we will not undertake such investments unless adequate sources of financing are available. Funds for future hotel-related investments are expected to be derived, in whole or in part, from future borrowings under a credit facility or other borrowings or from the proceeds of additional issuances of common stock, preferred stock, or other securities. However, other than the aforementioned acquisitions and those mentioned in subsequent events discussion below, we have no formal commitment or understanding to invest in additional assets, and there can be no assurance that we will successfully make additional investments.
      Our existing hotels are located in developed areas that contain competing hotel properties. The future occupancy, ADR, and RevPAR of any individual hotel could be materially and adversely affected by an increase in the number or quality of the competitive hotel properties in its market area. Competition could also affect the quality and quantity of future investment opportunities.
Inflation
      We rely entirely on the performance of our properties and the ability of the properties’ managers to increase revenues to keep pace with inflation. Hotel operators can generally increase room rates rather quickly,

48


Table of Contents

but competitive pressures may limit their ability to raise rates faster than inflation. Our general and administrative costs, such as real estate and personal property taxes, property and casualty insurance, and utilities, are subject to inflation as well.
Seasonality
      Our properties’ operations historically have been seasonal as certain properties maintain higher occupancy rates during the summer months. This seasonality pattern can be expected to cause fluctuations in our quarterly lease revenue under the percentage leases. We anticipate that our cash flow from the operation of the properties will be sufficient to enable us to make quarterly distributions to maintain our REIT status. To the extent that cash flow from operations is insufficient during any quarter due to temporary or seasonal fluctuations in lease revenue, we expect to utilize other cash on hand or borrowings to make required distributions. However, we cannot make any assurances that we will make distributions in the future.
Critical Accounting Policies
      Our accounting policies are more fully described in note 3 to our consolidated financial statements. As disclosed in note 3, the preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. The Company believes that the following discussion addresses the Company’s most critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective, and complex judgments.
      Investment in Hotel Properties — The initial six hotel properties are stated at the Predecessor’s historical cost, net of any impairment charges, plus an approximate $8.1 million minority interest partial step-up recorded upon formation of the Company on August 29, 2003, related to the acquisition of minority interest from unaffiliated parties associated with four of the initial properties. Hotel properties acquired subsequent to the Company’s formation are stated at cost. All improvements and additions which extend the useful life of hotel properties are capitalized.
      Impairment of Investment in Hotel Properties — Hotel properties are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of the hotel properties may not be recoverable. The Company tests for impairment in several situations, including when current or projected cash flows are less than historical cash flows, when it becomes more likely than not that a hotel will be sold before the end of its previously estimated useful life, and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that a hotel’s net book value may not be recoverable. In the evaluation of the impairment of hotel properties, the Company makes many assumptions and estimates, including projected cash flows, holding period, expected useful life, future capital expenditures, and fair values, including consideration of capitalization rates, discount rates, and comparable selling prices. To date, no such impairment charges have been recognized. If an asset were deemed to be impaired, the Company would record an impairment charge for the amount that the property’s net book value exceeds its fair value.
      Depreciation and Amortization Expense — Depreciation expense is based on the estimated useful life of the Company’s assets, while amortization expense for leasehold improvements is the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the related assets. Presently, hotel properties are depreciated using the straight-line method over lives which range from 15 to 39 years for buildings and improvements and 3 to 5 years for furniture, fixtures, and equipment. While the Company believes its estimates are reasonable, a change in the estimated lives could affect depreciation expense and net income (loss) as well as the gain or loss on the potential sale of any of the Company’s hotels.
      Notes Receivable — The Company provides mezzanine and first-mortgage financing in the form of loans. Loans receivable are recorded at cost, adjusted for net origination fees and costs. Premiums, discounts, and net origination fees are amortized or accreted as an adjustment to interest income using the effective interest method. Loans receivable are reviewed for potential impairment at each balance sheet date. A loan receivable

49


Table of Contents

is considered impaired when, based on current information, it becomes probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the loan’s contractual terms. The amount of impairment, if any, is measured by comparing the recorded amount of the loan to the present value of the expected cash flows or fair value of collateral. If a loan were deemed to be impaired, the Company would record a reserve for loan losses through a charge to income for any shortfall. To date, no such impairment charges have been recognized.
      In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” as revised (“FIN No. 46”), variable interest entities, as defined, are required to be consolidated by their primary beneficiaries if the variable interest entities do not effectively disperse risks among parties involved. The Company’s mezzanine and first-mortgage loans receivable are each secured by various hotel properties or partnership interests in hotel properties and are subordinate to primary loans related to the secured hotels. All of these loans receivable are considered to be variable interests in the entities that own the related hotels, which are variable interest entities. However, the Company is not considered to be the primary beneficiary of these hotel properties as a result of holding these loans. Therefore, the Company does not consolidate the hotels for which it has provided financing. Interests in entities acquired or created in the future will be evaluated based on FIN No. 46 criteria, and such entities will be consolidated, if required. The analysis utilized by the Company in evaluating FIN No. 46 criteria involves considerable management judgment and assumptions.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
      As of December 31, 2004, our contractual obligations and commitments are as follows:
                                           
    Payments due by Period
     
    <1 Year   2-3 Years   4-5 Years   >5 Years   Total
                     
Indebtedness payments
  $ 16,093,979     $ 274,371,524     $ 1,163,947     $ 9,124,744     $ 300,754,194  
Capital leases payments
    132,337       180,247                   312,584  
Operating leases payments
    591,591       956,076       822,997       13,343,864       15,714,528  
Interest payments
    14,250,452       13,193,601       1,129,004       632,850       29,205,907  
                               
 
Total contractual obligations
  $ 31,068,359     $ 288,701,448     $ 3,115,948     $ 23,101,458     $ 345,987,213  
                               
      At December 31, 2004, our capital commitments were approximately $2.6 million, which relate to general capital improvements.
      In addition, the Company has entered into employment agreements with certain executive officers, which provide for minimum annual base salaries, other fringe benefits, and non-compete clauses as determined by the board of directors. The agreements have varying terms expiring between December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2007, with automatic one-year renewals, unless terminated by either party upon six months’ notice, subject to severance provisions.
Subsequent Events
      On July 7, 2004, the Company acquired a hotel property and adjacent office building in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from Household OPEB I, Inc. for approximately $16.7 million in cash. At the time of the acquisition, the Company planned to sell the office building, which had one tenant and nominal operations. The Company allocated approximately $2.9 million of the purchase price to the office building. On January 19, 2005, the Company sold the office building for approximately $2.9 million, which is net of nominal closing costs.
      On January 20, 2005, in a follow-on public offering, the Company issued 10,350,000 shares of its common stock at $9.62 per share, which generated gross proceeds of approximately $99.6 million. However, the aggregate proceeds to the Company, net of underwriters’ discount and offering costs, was approximately $94.3 million. The 10,350,000 shares issued include 1,350,000 shares sold pursuant to an over-allotment option granted to the underwriters. Of the net proceeds, a portion was used to partially fund the $35.0 million cash

50


Table of Contents

portion of the purchase price associated with the acquisition of twenty-one hotel properties, which was closed on March 16, 2005. The net proceeds were also used for the repayment of approximately $14.7 million of the mortgage debt assumed in the acquisition, repayment of the outstanding $17.8 million balance on the $60.0 million credit facility, due August 17, 2007, repayment of the $15.5 million mortgage note payable, due December 31, 2005, repayment of the $7.0 mortgage note payable, due July 31, 2007, and general corporate purposes.
      Pursuant to the Company’s Series B Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement and subsequent amendment, a financial institution has certain participation rights with respect to any sale of equity securities by the Company. Based on these participation rights and the follow-on public offering discussed above, the financial institution has the option to purchase up to 2,070,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for $9.139 per share, the issuance of which would occur on November 1, 2005. If the financial institution has not exercised its option, the Company, at its option, may cause the financial institution to purchase the 2,070,000 shares for $9.139 per share on November 1, 2005, or on an earlier date provided the Company has sold all of the Series B preferred stock to the financial institution in accordance with the terms of the purchase agreement.
      On January 30, 2005, the Company’s Sheraton hotel in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, experienced a fire that resulted in extensive water damage to several of its floors. The entire hotel was subsequently closed for two weeks, and approximately half of the hotel remains temporarily closed. Although the Company’s insurance covers both physical damage and business-interruption losses, the Company is still assessing the impact of this fire. The Company currently estimates its property damage and business-interruption losses at approximately $1.0 million and $250,000, respectively. The Company’s insurance deductible related to this incident is $25,000.
      On February 8, 2005, the Company originated a mezzanine loan receivable of approximately $8.0 million, with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 9.13%, maturing February 2007 with three one-year extension options, with interest-only payments through maturity, prepayment prohibited through September 2006, and a prepayment penalty imposed between September 2006 and maturity.
      On March 9, 2005, the Company announced it will be acquiring the Hilton Santa Fe hotel in Santa Fe, New Mexico, from Santa Fe Hotel Joint Venture for approximately $18.2 million in cash. In addition, the Company plans an additional $2.5 million for future capital improvements. The purchase price was the result of an arms’ length negotiation. Annualized revenues of this hotel property are approximately $7.7 million. The Company plans to utilize cash from borrowings or cash from its follow-on public offering to fund this acquisition. The acquisition is expected to close in late March 2005.
      On March 9, 2005, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.16 per diluted share for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on March 31, 2005, payable April 15, 2005.
      On March 15, 2005, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.53 per diluted share for Series A preferred shareholders of record on March 31, 2005, payable April 15, 2005.
      On March 16, 2005, the Company acquired twenty-one hotel properties from selling entities controlled by affiliates of Fisher Brothers, Gordon Getty Trust, and George Soros, which collectively owned approximately 78% of the acquired hotels, and certain members of the Company’s senior management, which collectively owned approximately 22% of the acquired hotels, for approximately $250.0 million plus certain closing costs. The selling entities are collectively referred to as FGSB. The $250 million purchase price consisted of approximately $35.0 million in cash, approximately $164.7 million in assumed mortgage debt, and approximately $50.3 million worth of limited partnership units, which equates to 4,994,150 units based on the average market price of the Company’s common stock for the 20-day period ending five business days before signing a definitive agreement to acquire these properties on December 23, 2004. Company management received their net consideration for the acquisition in the form of limited partnership units, whereas the third parties received 50% of their consideration in limited partnership units and 50% in cash. Annualized revenues of these twenty-one hotel properties are approximately $114.9 million. When the Company entered into the agreement to acquire these 21 properties, it began assessing various strategic alternatives related to eight of the relatively

51


Table of Contents

smaller hotel properties, including possible sales of these properties. Since that time, the Company has secured contracts for the sale of two of the properties and letters of intent related to the sale of the other six properties. The Company used proceeds from its sale of Series B cumulative convertible redeemable preferred stock, from its follow-on public offering, and from a $15.0 million draw on its $60.0 million credit facility on March 16, 2005 to fund the acquisition of these properties. Regarding this acquisition, the Company’s Board of Directors formed a Special Committee solely comprised of independent directors to evaluate this transaction. The Special Committee retained independent advisors and to review, evaluate, and negotiate the transaction, which the Special Committee unanimously approved. The Special Committee will be paid $195,000 related to their services.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
      Our primary market risk exposure consists of changes in interest rates on borrowings under our debt instruments that bear interest at variable rates that fluctuate with market interest rates. The analysis below presents the sensitivity of the market value of our financial instruments to selected changes in market interest rates.
      As of December 31, 2004, our $300.8 million debt portfolio consisted of approximately $279.0 million of outstanding variable-rate debt and approximately $21.8 million of outstanding of fixed-rate debt, with interest rates ranging from 7.08% to 7.25%. As discussed below, $105.0 million of the variable-rate debt was converted to fixed-rate debt via an interest rate swap.
      On September 2, 2004, we purchased a 6.0% LIBOR interest rate cap with a $210.0 million notional amount to limit our exposure to rising interest rates on $210.0 million of our floating-rate debt. To partially offset the cost of the purchased cap, we sold a 6.0% LIBOR interest rate cap with a $105.0 million notional amount with identical terms to the purchased cap. Hence, we own a net interest rate cap with a $105.0 million notional amount. Both the purchased and sold interest rate caps mature October 2, 2006.
      On September 7, 2004, we entered into a $105.0 million stair-stepped interest rate swap agreement, at an average interest rate of 4.9% over the term of the swap, which matures March 1, 2007. The interest rate swap effectively converts the interest payments on $105.0 million of our floating-rate debt to a fixed rate.
      Our objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements or other identified risks. To accomplish this objective, we primarily use interest rate swaps and caps as part of our cash flow hedging strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts in exchange for fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying principal amount. Purchased interest rate caps provide us with interest rate protection above the strike rate on the cap and result in us receiving interest payments when rates are above the cap strike.
      For the year ended December 31, 2004, the impact to our results of operations of a one-point change in interest rate on the outstanding balance of variable-rate debt as of December 31, 2004, net of the $105.0 million notional amount protected by an interest rate swap as of that date, would be approximately $1.7 million.
      As of December 31, 2004, we owned approximately $79.7 million of variable-rate loans receivable. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the impact to our results of operations of a one-point change in interest rate on the outstanding balance of variable-rate loans receivable as of December 31, 2004, would be approximately $797,000. We had no other outstanding loans receivable as of December 31, 2004.
      As of December 31, 2003, we had approximately $43.8 million of outstanding variable-rate debt. The impact to our annual results of operations of a one-point change in interest rate on the outstanding balance of variable-rate debt as of December 31, 2003, would be approximately $438,000. We also had approximately $6.4 million of 7.08% fixed-rate debt outstanding at December 31, 2003. We had no other outstanding debt as of December 31, 2003.

52


Table of Contents

      As of December 31, 2003, we owned a $10 million mezzanine variable-rate loan receivable. The impact to our annual results of operations of a one-point change in interest rate on the outstanding balance of variable-rate loans receivable as of December 31, 2003, would be approximately $100,000. We had no other outstanding loans receivable as of December 31, 2003.
      The above amounts were determined based on the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our borrowing cost, and assume no changes in our capital structure. As the information presented above includes only those exposures that exist as of December 31, 2004, it does not consider those exposures or positions which could arise after that date. Hence, the information represented herein has limited predictive value. As a result, the ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, the hedging strategies at the time, and the related interest rates.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
      The required financial statements are filed herein as listed in Item 15.
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
      None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
      As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Director and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
      Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Director and our Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on that evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2004.
      Our management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of certain acquired businesses, which were excluded from the scope of our assessment, but are included in our 2004 consolidated financial statements. Such acquired businesses are listed below:
  SpringHill Suites hotel in Baltimore, Maryland.
  Four hotel properties acquired from Day Hospitality Group.
  Nine hotel properties acquired from Dunn Hospitality Group.
  Hyatt Orange County hotel in Anaheim, California.
      These businesses constituted approximately $188.6 million and $179.0 million of total and net assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2004 and approximately $19.3 million and $3.7 million of revenues and operating income, respectively, for the year then ended.
      Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included elsewhere herein.

53


Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
      There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
      The required information is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 3, 2005.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
      The required information is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 3, 2005.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
      The required information is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 3, 2005.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
      The required information is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 3, 2005.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
      The required information is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 3, 2005.
PART IV
Item 15. Financial Statement Schedules and Exhibits
      (a) Financial Statements and Schedules
           
Reports of Independent Auditors
    61  
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements:
       
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets for the Company as of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003
    64  
 
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations for the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, and for the period from August 29, 2003 through December 31, 2003, and for the Predecessor for the period from January 1, 2003 through August 28, 2003, and the year ended December 31, 2002
    65  
 
Consolidated and Combined Statement of Owners’ Equity for the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, and the period from August 29, 2003 through December 31, 2003, and for the Predecessor for the period from January 1, 2003 through August 28, 2003, and the year ended December 31, 2002
    66  
 
Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, and for the period from August 29, 2003 through December 31, 2003, and for the Predecessor for the period from January 1, 2003 through August 28, 2003, and the year ended December 31, 2002
    67  
 
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements
    68  
 
Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation as of December 31, 2004
    98  

54


Table of Contents

      All other financial statement schedules are either not required under the related instructions, have been omitted because such financial statement schedules are not significant, or have been omitted because the required information has been disclosed elsewhere in the consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes thereto.
      (b) Exhibits
         
Exhibit    
Number   Description of Exhibit
     
  3 .1   Articles of Amendment and Restatement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 31,2003)
 
  3 .2.1   Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 31, 2003)
 
  3 .2.2   Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2.2 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003)
 
  4 .1   Form of Certificate for Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Form S-11/ A, filed on August 20, 2003)
 
  4 .2   Articles Supplementary for Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock, dated December 28, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K, dated January 4, 2005, for the event dated December 28, 2004)
 
  4 .3   Articles Supplementary for Series B-2 Convertible Preferred Stock, dated December 28, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K, dated January 4, 2005, for the event dated December 28, 2004)
 
  10 .1.1   Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Ashford Hospitality Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 10-Q, filed on November 14, 2003)
 
  10 .1.2   Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Ashford Hospitality Limited Partnership, dated October 16, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Form 10-Q, filed on November 14, 2003)
 
  10 .1.3   Amended and Restated Exhibit A to Agreement of Limited Partnership of Ashford Hospitality Limited Partnership, dated September 26, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Form 10-Q, filed on November 14, 2003)
 
  10 .2   Registration Rights Agreement among Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. and the persons named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 31, 2003)
 
  10 .3   2003 Stock Plan of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 31, 2003)
 
  10 .4   Non-Compete Agreement between Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. and Archie Bennett, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 31, 2003)
 
  10 .5.1   Employment Agreement between Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. and Montgomery J, Bennett (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 31, 2003)
 
  10 .5.2   Employment Agreement between Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. and Douglas Kessler (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 31, 2003)
 
  10 .5.3   Employment Agreement between Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. and David A, Brooks (incorporated by reference 10 Exhibit 10.7 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 31, 2003)
 
  10 .5.4   Employment Agreement between Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. and David Kimichik (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 31, 2003)
 
  10 .5.6   Employment Agreement between Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. and Mark Nunneley (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of Form S-11/ A, filed On July 31, 2003)
 
  10 .6   Form of Management Agreement between Remington Lodging and Ashford TRS Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 31, 2003)
 
  10 .7   Form of Lease Agreement between Ashford Hospitality Limited Partnership and Ashford TRS Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 31, 2003)

55


Table of Contents

         
Exhibit    
Number   Description of Exhibit
     
 
  10 .8.1   Omnibus Option Agreement between Ashford Hospitality Limited Partnership, Remington Suites Austin, L.P., Remington Suites Dallas, L.P., Remington Suites Dulles, L.P., Remington Suites Las Vegas, L.P., Chicago Illinois Hotel Limited Partnership and Remington Long Island Hotel, L.P., dated as of May 15, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of Form S-11, filed on May 15, 2003)
 
  10 .8.2   Option Agreement between Ashford Hospitality Limited Partnership and Ashford Financial Corporation, dated as of May 15, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of Form S-11, filed on May 15, 2003)
 
  10 .9.1   Asset Management and Consulting Agreement by and between Remington Hospitality, Inc. and Ashford Financial Corporation, dated as of May 15, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 2, 2003)
 
  10 .9.2   Asset Management and Consulting Agreement by and between Remington Indianapolis Employers Corporation and Ashford Financial Corporation, dated as of May 15, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 2, 2003)
 
  10 .9.3   Asset Management and Consulting Agreement by and between, Remington Milford Hotel Employers Corporation and Ashford Financial Corporation, dated as of May 15, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 2, 2003)
 
  10 .9.4   Asset Management and Consulting Agreement by and between Remington Suites Hotel Corporation and Ashford Financial Corporation, dated as of May 15, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 2, 2003)
 
  10 .9.5   Asset Management and Consulting Agreement by and between Remington Employers Corporation and Ashford Financial Corporation, dated as of May 15, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 2, 2003)
 
  10 .9.6   Asset Management and Consulting Agreement by and between Remington Employers Management Corporation and Ashford Financial Corporation, dated as of May 15, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 2, 2003)
 
  10 .9.7   Asset Management and Consulting Agreement by and between Remington Orlando Management Corporation and Ashford Financial Corporation, dated as of May 15, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 2, 2003)
 
  10 .9.8   Asset Management and Consulting Agreement by and between Remington Ventura Employers Corporation and Ashford Financial Corporation, dated as of May 15, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 2, 2003)
 
  10 .10.1   Assignment and Assumption of Contract and Contract Rights between Ashford Hospitality Limited Partnership and Ashford Financial Corporation, dated October 7, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Form 10-Q, filed on November 14, 2003)
 
  10 .10.2   Assignment and Assumption of Contract and Contract Rights between Ashford Hospitality Limited Partnership and Ashford Financial Corporation, dated January 4, 2004 Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003)
 
  10 .11   Guaranty by Ashford Financial Corporation in favor of Ashford Hospitality Trust Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 31, 2003)
 
  10 .12   Mutual Exclusivity Agreement by and between Ashford Hospitality Limited Partnership, Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., Remington Hotel Corporation and Remington Lodging and Hospitality, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 0.22 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 31, 2003)
 
  10 .13   Tax Indemnification Agreement between Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. and the persons named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 of Form S-11/ A, filed on July 31, 2003)
 
  10 .14   Hotel Loan Agreement, dated December 24, 2003, among the Registrant and Merrill Lynch Capital, a division of Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004)

56


Table of Contents

         
Exhibit    
Number   Description of Exhibit
     
 
  10 .15   Secured Revolving Credit Facility Agreement, dated February 5, 2004, among the Registrant and Credit Lyonnais New York Branch, as Administrative Agent and Sole Lead Arranger and Book Manager, and Merrill Lynch Capital, a division of Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services, Inc., as Syndication Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q tor the quarter ended March 31, 2004)
 
  10 .15.1   First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated August 17, 2004, among the Registrant, Calyon New York Branch, and Merrill Lynch Capital (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.1 the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
 
  10 .16   Loan and Security Agreement, dated July 13, 2004, among the Registrant and Capital Source Finance LLC Capital (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2004)
 
  10 .17   Loan Agreement, dated September 2, 2004, among the Registrant, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc., and Merrill Lynch Capital (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 the Registrant’s Form  10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
 
  10 .17.1   Mezzanine Loan Agreement, dated September 2, 2004, among the Registrant and Merrill Lynch Capital (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17.1 the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
 
  10 .17.2   Broker Agreement, dated May 10, 2004, among the Registrant and Secured Capital Corp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17.2 the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
 
  10 .18   Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated May 19, 2004, among the Registrant, Dunn Hospitality Group, and entities related to Dunn Hospitality Group Corp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-18 the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
 
  10 .18.1   First Amendment to Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated July 1, 2004, among the Registrant, Dunn Hospitality Group, and entities related to Dunn Hospitality Group-Corp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18.1 the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for me quarter ended September 30, 2004)
 
  10 .18.2   Second Amendment to Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated July 23, 2004, among the Registrant, Dunn Hospitality Group (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18.2 the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
 
  10 .18.3   Third Amendment to Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated August 4, 2004, among the Registrant, Dunn Hospitality Group, and entities related to Dunn Hospitality Group (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10,18.3 the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
 
  10 .18.4   Fourth Amendment to Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated September 2, 2004, among the Registrant, Dunn Hospitality Group, and entities related to Dunn Hospitality Group (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18.4 the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
 
  10 .19   International Swap Dealers Association, Inc. Master Agreement, dated September 2, 2004, among the Registrant and Calyon New York Branch (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
 
  10 .19.1   International Swap Dealers Association, Inc. Master Agreement, dated September 2, 2004, among the Registrant and SMBC Derivative Products Limited Branch (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19.1 the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
 
  10 .19.2   International Swap Dealers Association, Inc. Master Agreement, dated September 2, 2004, among this Registrant and SMBC Derivative Products Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19.2 the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004)
 
  10 .20   Contribution and Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated December 27, 2004, between the Registrant and FGSB Master Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K, dated December 28, 2004, for the event dated December 27, 2004)

57


Table of Contents

         
Exhibit    
Number   Description of Exhibit
     
 
  10 .21   Purchase Agreement, dated December 27, 2004, between the Registrant and Security Capital Preferred Growth Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K, dated December 23, 2004, for the event dated December 27. 2004)
 
  10 .21.1   Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 27, 2004, between the Registrant and Security Capital Preferred Growth Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K, dated December 28, 2004, for the event dated December 27, 2004)
 
  10 .21.2   Amendment #1 to Purchase Agreement, dated February 8, 2005, between the Registrant and Security Capital Preferred Growth Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21.2 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K, dated February 9, 2005, for the event dated February 8, 2005)
 
  *10 .22   Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated July 28, 2004, between the Registrant and Atrium Plaza, LLC.
 
  *10 .22.1   Amendment #1 to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated August 26, 2004, between the Registrant and Atrium Plaza, LLC.
 
  *10 .22.2   Amendment #2 to Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated September 28, 2004, between the Registrant and Atrium Plaza, LLC.
 
  *21 .1   Registrant’s Subsidiaries Listing as of December 31, 2004
 
  *23 .1   Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
 
  *31 .1   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
 
  *31 .2   Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
 
  *31 .3   Certification of the Chief Accounting Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
 
  *32 .1   Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (In accordance with Sec Release 33-8212, this exhibit is being furnished, and is not being filed as part of this report or as a separate disclosure document, and is not being incorporated by reference into any Securities Act of 1933 registration statement.)
 
  *32 .2   Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (In accordance with Sec Release 33-8212, this exhibit is being furnished, and is not being filed as part of this report or as a separate disclosure document, and is not being incorporated by reference into any Securities Act of 1933 registration statement.)
 
  *32 .3   Certification of the Chief Accounting Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (In accordance with Sec Release 33-8212, this exhibit is being furnished, and is not being filed as part of this report or as a separate disclosure document, and is not being incorporated by reference into any Securities Act of 1933 registration statement.)
 
Filed herewith.

58


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on March 16, 2005.
  ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC.
  By:  /s/ MONTGOMERY J. BENNETT
 
 
  Montgomery J. Bennett
  Chief Executive Officer
      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
             
Signature   Title   Date
         
 
/s/ ARCHIE BENNETT, JR.
 
Archie Bennett, Jr.
  Chairman of the Board of Directors   March 16, 2005
 
/s/ MONTGOMERY J. BENNETT
 
Montgomery J. Bennett
  President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director (Principal Executive Officer)   March 16, 2005
 
/s/ DAVID J. KIMICHIK
 
David J. Kimichik
  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)   March 16, 2005
 
/s/ MARK L. NUNNELEY
 
Mark L. Nunneley
  Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)   March 16, 2005
 
/s/ MARTIN L. EDELMAN
 
Martin L. Edelman
  Director   March 16, 2005
 
/s/ W. D. MINAMI
 
W. D. Minami
  Director   March 16, 2005
 
/s/ W. MICHAEL MURPHY
 
W. Michael Murphy
  Director   March 16, 2005
 
/s/ PHILIP S. PAYNE
 
Philip S. Payne
  Director   March 16, 2005
 
/s/ CHARLES P. TOPPINO
 
Charles P. Toppino
  Director   March 16, 2005

59


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
           
    61  
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements:
       
      64  
      65  
      66  
      67  
      68  
      98  
      All other financial statement schedules are either not required under the related instructions, have been omitted because such financial statement schedules are not significant, or have been omitted because the required information has been disclosed elsewhere in the consolidated and combined financial statements and related notes thereto.

60


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.
      We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the Company’s consolidated statements of operations, owners’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2004 and for the period from August 29, 2003 (inception) to December 31, 2003, and the combined statements of operations, owners’ equity, and cash flows of the Predecessor, as defined in Note 1, for the period from January 1, 2003 to August 28, 2003, and the year ended December 31, 2002. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15 (a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
      We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
      In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the Company’s consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2004 and for the period from August 29, 2003 (inception) to December 31, 2003, and the Predecessor’s combined results of operations and cash flows for the period from January 1, 2003 to August 28, 2003, and the year ended December 31, 2002 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
      We also have audited, in accordance with the Standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report, dated March 15, 2005, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 15, 2005

61


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.
      We have audited Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, which concludes that Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
      We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
      A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
      Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
      As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of certain acquired businesses, which are included in the 2004 consolidated financial statements of the Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. and constituted approximately $188.6 million and $179.0 million of total and net assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2004 and approximately $19.3 million and $3.7 million of revenues and operating income, respectively, for the year then ended. Such acquired businesses include the following: SpringHill Suites hotel in Baltimore, Maryland, four hotel properties acquired from Day Hospitality Group, nine hotel properties acquired from Dunn Hospitality Group, and Hyatt Orange County hotel in Anaheim, California. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of these acquired businesses.
      In our opinion, management’s assessment that Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the COSO criteria.

62


Table of Contents

      We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the 2004 consolidated financial statements of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., and our report dated March 15, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 15, 2005

63


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                   
    December 31,   December 31,
    2004   2003
         
ASSETS
Investment in hotel properties, net
  $ 427,005,476     $ 173,723,998  
Cash and cash equivalents
    47,108,957       76,254,052  
Restricted cash
    14,058,776       1,373,591  
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $61,479 and $19,408, respectively
    5,463,452       1,534,843  
Inventories
    611,807       262,619  
Assets held for sale
    2,881,912        
Notes receivable
    79,661,549       10,000,000  
Deferred costs, net
    9,389,506       2,386,937  
Prepaid expenses
    2,638,842       1,577,628  
Other assets
    6,676,776       550,636  
Due from affiliates
    447,784       218,113  
             
 
Total assets
  $ 595,944,837     $ 267,882,417  
             
 
LIABILITIES AND OWNERS’ EQUITY
Indebtedness
  $ 300,754,194     $ 50,201,779  
Capital leases payable
    312,584       456,869  
Accounts payable
    8,979,635       2,127,611  
Accrued expenses
    9,339,656       4,572,594  
Other liabilities
    90,334        
Dividends payable
    6,141,506        
Deferred income
    400,919        
Due to affiliates
    1,907,057       584,643  
             
 
Total liabilities
    327,925,885       57,943,496  
 
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 15)
           
Minority interest
    39,346,641       37,646,673  
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value:
               
 
Series B Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, 993,049 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004
    9,980,529        
 
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized:
               
 
Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock, 2,300,000 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004
    23,000        
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 25,810,447 and 25,730,047 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively
    258,104       257,300  
Additional paid-in capital
    234,993,015       179,226,668  
Unearned compensation
    (3,959,468 )     (5,564,401 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    554,592        
Accumulated deficit
    (13,177,461 )     (1,627,319 )
             
 
Total owners’ equity
    218,691,782       172,292,248  
             
Total liabilities and owners’ equity
  $ 595,944,837     $ 267,882,417  
             
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

64


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                       
    The Company   The Company   The Predecessor   The Predecessor
                 
        Period from   Period from    
    Year Ended   August 29, 2003 to   January 1, 2003 to   Year Ended
    December 31, 2004   December 31, 2003   August 28, 2003   December 31, 2002
                 
REVENUE
                               
   
Rooms
  $ 89,798,311     $ 14,994,567     $ 19,688,349     $ 28,529,640  
   
Food and beverage
    14,336,531       2,529,109       3,629,807       5,698,029  
   
Other
    3,922,621       507,794       681,656       1,130,112  
                         
     
Total hotel revenue
    108,057,463       18,031,470       23,999,812       35,357,781  
   
Interest income from notes receivable
    7,549,445       110,000              
   
Asset management fees from related parties (see Note 14)
    1,318,154       137,319              
                         
 
Total Revenue
    116,925,062       18,278,789       23,999,812       35,357,781  
EXPENSES
                               
 
Hotel operating expenses
                               
   
Rooms
    20,907,848       3,601,465       4,511,632       6,461,721  
   
Food and beverage
    10,859,032       1,901,778       2,801,002       4,183,371  
   
Other direct
    2,150,404       402,536       498,085       621,693  
   
Indirect
    35,560,902       6,136,070       8,687,362       12,370,304  
   
Management fees, including related parties (see Note 14)
    3,395,106       651,480       718,408       1,059,867  
                         
     
Total hotel expenses
    72,873,292       12,693,329       17,216,489       24,696,956  
 
Property taxes, insurance, and other
    6,654,858       1,257,968       1,600,082       2,437,482  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    10,767,785       2,016,899       2,915,777       4,833,551  
 
Corporate general and administrative:
                               
   
Stock-based compensation
    2,397,130       864,452              
   
Other corporate and administrative
    9,457,814       3,138,498              
                         
 
Total Operating Expenses
    102,150,879       19,971,146       21,732,348       31,967,989  
                         
 
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
    14,774,183       (1,692,357 )     2,267,464       3,389,792  
 
Interest income
    335,495       266,333       22,800       53,485  
 
Interest expense
    (9,217,377 )     (374,223 )     (4,225,289 )     (5,715,229 )
 
Amortization of loan costs
    (1,883,841 )     (42,837 )     (357,857 )     (820,966 )
 
Write-off of loan costs
    (1,633,369 )                  
                         
 
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY INTEREST
    2,375,091       (1,843,084 )     (2,292,882 )     (3,092,918 )
 
Provision for income taxes
    (658,273 )     (142,178 )            
 
Minority interest
    (297,611 )     357,943              
                         
 
NET INCOME (LOSS)
    1,419,207       (1,627,319 )     (2,292,882 )     (3,092,918 )
 
Preferred dividends
    1,355,250                    
                         
 
NET INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
  $ 63,957     $ (1,627,319 )   $ (2,292,882 )   $ (3,092,918 )
                         
 
Net Income (Loss) Per Share Available To Common Shareholders:
                               
   
Basic and Diluted
  $ 0.00     $ (0.07 )                
                         
 
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
                               
   
Basic and Diluted
    25,120,653       24,627,298                  
                         
See notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.

65


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC.
Consolidated And Combined Statement of Owners’ Equity
Predecessor from January 1, 2002 through August 28, 2003, and
Company from August 29, 2003 (Inception) to December 31, 2004
                                                                             
    Preferred Stock   Common Stock           Accumulated        
            Additional       Other        
    Number of   $0.01 Par   Number of   $0.01 Par   Paid-In   Unearned   Comprehensive   Accumulated    
    Shares   Value   Shares   Value   Capital   Compensation   Income   Deficit   Total
                                     
Balance at January 1, 2002
        $           $     $     $     $     $ 15,316,967     $ 15,316,967  
 
Contributions
                                              2,191,675       2,191,675  
 
Distributions
                                              (2,629,740 )     (2,629,740 )
 
Owner Redemption
                                              (2,475,000 )     (2,475,000 )
 
Net Loss
                                              (3,092,918 )     (3,092,918 )
                                                       
Balance at December 31, 2002
                                              9,310,984       9,310,984  
 
Contributions
                                              765,000       765,000  
 
Distributions
                                              (1,850,750 )     (1,850,750 )
 
Net Loss
                                              (2,292,882 )     (2,292,882 )
                                                       
Balance at August 28, 2003
        $           $     $     $     $     $ 5,932,352     $ 5,932,352  
                                                       
Formation Transactions on August 29, 2003:
                                                                       
 
Issuance of Shares in Connection with Initial Public Offering
        $       22,500,000     $ 225,000     $ 202,171,981     $     $     $     $ 202,396,981  
 
Underwriters’ Fees and Offering Expenses
                            (16,925,000 )                       (16,925,000 )
 
Issuance of Restricted Shares to Employees & Directors
                675,300       6,753       6,070,947       (6,077,700 )                  
 
Issuance of Shares to Underwriters
                65,024       650       (650 )                        
 
Issuance of Shares Sold to CEO & Chairman
                500,000       5,000       4,180,000                         4,185,000  
 
Contribution of Initial Properties
                            7,063,690                         7,063,690  
 
Issuance of Shares for Initial Properties
                216,634       2,167       (2,167 )                        
 
Over-allotment Option Exercised on September 26, 2003:
                                                                       
   
Issuance of Shares
                1,734,072       17,340       15,589,307                         15,606,647  
   
Underwriters’ Fees
                            (1,092,465 )                       (1,092,465 )
   
Issuance of Restricted Shares to Employees
                39,017       390       350,763       (351,153 )                  
 
Establish Minority Interest in Operating Partnership
                            (38,004,615 )                       (38,004,615 )
 
Additional Offering Expenses
                            (175,123 )                       (175,123 )
 
Amortization of Unearned Compensation
                                  864,452                   864,452  
 
Net Loss
                                              (1,627,319 )     (1,627,319 )
                                                       
Balance at December 31, 2003
        $       25,730,047     $ 257,300     $ 179,226,668     $ (5,564,401 )   $     $ (1,627,319 )   $ 172,292,248  
 
Amortization of Unearned Compensation
                                  2,337,796                   2,337,796  
 
Issuance of Restricted Common Shares to Employees
                70,400       704       732,159       (732,863 )                  
 
Issuance of Common Shares to Directors
                10,000       100       88,900                         89,000  
 
Dividends Declared — Common Shares
                                              (11,614,099 )     (11,614,099 )
 
Issuance of Preferred Shares — Series A
    2,300,000       23,000                   54,945,288                         54,968,288  
 
Dividends Declared — Preferred Shares — Series A
                                              (1,351,940 )     (1,351,940 )
 
Dividends Declared — Preferred Shares — Series B
                                              (3,310 )     (3,310 )
 
Net Unrealized Gain on Derivative Instruments
                                        554,592             554,592  
 
Net Income
                                              1,419,207       1,419,207  
                                                       
Balance at December 31, 2004
    2,300,000     $ 23,000       25,810,447     $ 258,104     $ 234,993,015     $ (3,959,468 )   $ 554,592     $ (13,177,461 )   $ 218,691,782  
                                                       
   
Net Income for the year ended December 31, 2004
                                                    1,419,207                  
                                                       
   
Comprehensive Income for the year ended December 31, 2004
                                                  $ 1,973,799                  
                                                       
See notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.

66


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                       
    The Company   The Company   The Predecessor   The Predecessor
                 
        Period from   Period from    
    Year Ended   August 29, 2003 to   January 1, 2003 to   Year Ended
    December 31, 2004   December 31, 2003   August 28, 2003   December 31, 2002
                 
Cash flows from operating activities:
                               
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 1,419,207     $ (1,627,319 )   $ (2,292,882 )   $ (3,092,918 )
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flow provided by operations:
                               
   
Depreciation and amortization
    10,767,785       2,016,899       2,915,777       4,833,551  
   
Amortization of deferred financing costs
    1,883,841       42,837       357,857       820,966  
   
Write-off of loan costs
    1,633,369                    
   
Amortization of stock-based compensation
    2,397,130       864,452              
   
Minority interest
    297,611       (357,943 )            
   
Changes in assets and liabilities:
                               
     
Accounts receivable and inventories
    (3,333,833 )     39,962       (117,443 )     (382,040 )
     
Prepaids, other assets, and due from affiliates
    (6,867,495 )     (1,641,777 )     642,805       (742,621 )
     
Restricted cash
    (11,717,962 )     92,806       2,113,441       (176,429 )
     
Other liabilities
    10,171,789       2,828,881       (143,547 )     (637,775 )
                         
 
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
    6,651,442       2,258,798       3,476,008       622,734  
Cash flows from investing activities:
                               
 
Acquisitions or originations of notes receivable
    (87,824,342 )     (10,000,000 )            
 
Proceeds from payments of notes receivable
    18,085,993                    
 
Acquisitions of hotel properties
    (226,714,821 )     (78,587,180 )            
 
Improvements and additions to hotel properties
    (14,170,474 )     (411,148 )     (190,602 )     (1,079,824 )
                         
 
Net cash flow used in investing activities
    (310,623,644 )     (88,998,328 )     (190,602 )     (1,079,824 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
                               
 
Distributions paid to owners
                (1,850,750 )     (5,104,740 )
 
Contributions received from owners
                765,000       2,191,675  
 
Dividends paid
    (9,512,175 )                  
 
Borrowings on indebtedness and capital leases
    361,298,933       27,800,000             17,754,012  
 
Payments on indebtedness and capital leases
    (133,386,016 )     (62,843,451 )     (189,041 )     (15,695,113 )
 
Payments of deferred financing costs
    (8,522,452 )     (1,016,365 )           (872,291 )
 
Proceeds received from Series A preferred stock public offering
    54,968,288                    
 
Proceeds received from Series B preferred stock sale
    9,980,529                    
 
Proceeds received from initial public offering
          202,396,981              
 
Proceeds from sale of stock to CEO & Chairman
          4,185,000              
 
Cash paid upon the Company’s formation
          (4,942,642 )            
 
Proceeds received from over-allotment option
          15,606,647              
 
Payment of offering costs
          (18,192,588 )            
                         
 
Net cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities
    274,827,107       162,993,582       (1,274,791 )     (1,726,457 )
                         
 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
    (29,145,095 )     76,254,052       2,010,615       (2,183,547 )
 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning balance
    76,254,052             2,968,814       5,152,361  
                         
 
Cash and cash equivalents, ending balance
  $ 47,108,957     $ 76,254,052     $ 4,979,429     $ 2,968,814  
                         
See notes to consolidated and combined financial statements.

67


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002
1. Organization and Description of Business
      Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a self-advised real estate investment trust (“REIT”), which commenced operations on August 29, 2003 (“inception”) when it completed its initial public offering (“IPO”) and concurrently consummated certain other formation transactions, including the acquisition of six hotels (“initial properties”) and eight asset management and consulting contracts, all previously owned by affiliates of Remington Hotel Corporation (the “Predecessor”).
      The IPO consisted of the sale of 22,500,000 shares of common stock (“initial shares”), which included 22,336,478 shares sold to the public at a price of $9 per share and 163,522 shares sold to affiliates at a price of $8.37 a share. The IPO generated gross proceeds of approximately $202.4 million. However, the aggregate proceeds to the Company, net of underwriters’ discount and offering costs, was approximately $185.3 million. In addition to the initial shares, 500,000 shares of common stock were sold to Messrs. Archie and Montgomery Bennett, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, respectively, 216,634 shares of common stock were conveyed to a limited partnership owned by Messrs. Archie and Montgomery Bennett, 25,000 shares of restricted common stock were issued to Company directors, 65,024 shares of common stock were issued to the underwriters, and 650,300 shares of restricted common stock were issued to Company executives and certain employees of the Company and its affiliates. In total, 23,956,958 shares of common stock were issued in connection with the Company’s formation. In addition, 5,657,917 units of limited partnership interest, valued at $9 per unit, were issued to Company executives and certain employees of the Company and its affiliates.
      On September 26, 2003, the Company issued an additional 1,734,072 shares of common stock at a price of $9 per share pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option. This generated additional gross proceeds of approximately $15.6 million, or net proceeds of approximately $14.5 million after considering the underwriters’ fees of approximately $1.1 million. Concurrent with this, the Company issued an additional 39,017 shares of restricted common stock to its executives and certain employees of the Company and its affiliates.
      During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company completed the following transactions:
  •  On March 15, 2004, the Company issued an additional 70,400 shares of restricted common stock to its executives and certain employees.
 
  •  On April 1, 2004, the Company issued an additional 106,675 units of limited partnership interest in connection with the acquisition of a hotel property.
 
  •  On May 19, 2004, the Company issued an additional 10,000 shares of common stock to its directors as compensation for serving on the Board through May 2005.
 
  •  On September 2, 2004, the Company issued an additional 333,333 units of limited partnership interest in connection with the acquisition of nine hotel properties.
 
  •  On September 22, 2004, the Company issued 2,300,000 shares of Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock in a public offering of such preferred shares.
 
  •  On December 30, 2004, the Company issued 993,049 shares of Series B Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock to a financial institution.
      As of December 31, 2004, the Company owned 33 hotel properties in fourteen states with 5,095 rooms, and had acquired or originated mezzanine or first-mortgage loans receivable with a balance of approximately $79.7 million at December 31, 2004.

68


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      For the Company to qualify as a REIT, it cannot operate hotels. Therefore, the Company’s operating partnership leases its hotels to Ashford TRS Corporation (“Ashford TRS”), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the operating partnership. Ashford TRS then engages hotel management companies to operate the hotels under management contracts. Ashford TRS is treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary for federal income tax purposes. Therefore, the Company’s operating partnership and principal source of funds is dependent on Ashford TRS’s ability to generate cash flow from the operation of the Company’s hotels.
2. Basis of Presentation
      These consolidated financial statements presented herein include all of the accounts of the Company beginning with its commencement of operations on August 29, 2003. Prior to that time, this report includes the combined financial statements of the Predecessor. Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
3. Significant Accounting Policies Summary
      Principles of Consolidation — The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries. The Predecessor’s financials statements are presented on a combined basis as a result of common ownership and control. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions among the consolidated and combined entities have been eliminated in the consolidated and combined financial statements.
      Revenue Recognition — Hotel revenues include room, food, beverage, and other hotel revenues such as long-distance telephone service, laundry, and space rentals. Interest income from notes receivable represents interest earned on the Company’s mezzanine and first-mortgage loans receivable portfolio. Asset management fees relate to asset management services performed on behalf of an affiliate, including risk management and insurance procurement, assistance with taxes, negotiating franchise agreements and equipment leases, monitoring compliance with loan covenants, preparation of capital and operating budgets, and property litigation management. Revenues are recognized as the related services are delivered.
      Use of Estimates — The preparation of these consolidated and combined financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
      Investment in Hotel Properties — The initial six hotel properties are stated at the Predecessor’s historical cost, net of any impairment charges, plus an approximate $8.1 million minority interest partial step-up recorded upon formation of the Company on August 29, 2003, related to the acquisition of minority interest from unaffiliated parties associated with four of the initial properties. Hotel properties acquired subsequent to the Company’s formation are stated at cost. All improvements and additions which extend the useful life of hotel properties are capitalized.
      Impairment of Investment in Hotel Properties — Hotel properties are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of the hotel properties may not be recoverable. The Company tests for impairment in several situations, including when current or projected cash flows are less than historical cash flows, when it becomes more likely than not that a hotel will be sold before the end of its previously estimated useful life, and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that a hotel’s net book value may not be recoverable. In the evaluation of the impairment of hotel properties, the Company makes many assumptions and estimates, including projected cash flows, holding period, expected useful life, future capital expenditures, and fair values, including consideration of capitalization rates, discount rates, and comparable selling prices. To date, no such impairment charges have been recognized. If an asset were

69


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
deemed to be impaired, the Company would record an impairment charge for the amount that the property’s net book value exceeds its fair value.
      Depreciation and Amortization Expense — Depreciation expense is based on the estimated useful life of the Company’s assets, while amortization expense for leasehold improvements is the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the related assets. Presently, hotel properties are depreciated using the straight-line method over lives which range from 15 to 39 years for buildings and improvements and 3 to 5 years for furniture, fixtures, and equipment. While the Company believes its estimates are reasonable, a change in the estimated lives could affect depreciation expense and net income (loss) as well as the gain or loss on the potential sale of any of the Company’s hotels.
      Cash and Cash Equivalents — Cash and cash equivalents represent cash on hand and in banks plus short-term investments with an initial maturity of three months or less when purchased.
      Restricted Cash — Restricted cash includes reserves for debt service, real estate taxes, and insurance, as well as excess cash flow deposits and reserves for furniture, fixtures, and equipment replacements of approximately 4% of property revenue for certain hotels, as required by certain mortgage debt agreement restrictions and provisions.
      Accounts Receivable — Accounts receivable consists primarily of meeting and banquet room rental and hotel guest receivables. The Company generally does not require collateral. Ongoing credit evaluations are performed and an allowance for potential credit losses is provided against the portion of accounts receivable that is estimated to be uncollectible.
      Inventories — Inventories consist primarily of food, beverages, and gift store merchandise, and are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.
      Notes Receivable — The Company provides mezzanine and first-mortgage financing in the form of loans. Loans receivable are recorded at cost, adjusted for net origination fees and costs. Premiums, discounts, and net origination fees are amortized or accreted as an adjustment to interest income using the effective interest method. Loans receivable are reviewed for potential impairment at each balance sheet date. A loan receivable is considered impaired when, based on current information, it becomes probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the loan’s contractual terms. The amount of impairment, if any, is measured by comparing the recorded amount of the loan to the present value of the expected cash flows or fair value of collateral. If a loan were deemed to be impaired, the Company would record a reserve for loan losses through a charge to income for any shortfall. To date, no such impairment charges have been recognized.
      In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” as revised (“FIN No. 46”), variable interest entities, as defined, are required to be consolidated by their primary beneficiaries if the variable interest entities do not effectively disperse risks among parties involved. The Company’s mezzanine and first-mortgage loans receivable are each secured by various hotel properties or partnership interests in hotel properties and are subordinate to primary loans related to the secured hotels. All of these loans receivable are considered to be variable interests in the entities that own the related hotels, which are variable interest entities. However, the Company is not considered to be the primary beneficiary of these hotel properties as a result of holding these loans. Therefore, the Company does not consolidate the hotels for which it has provided financing. Interests in entities acquired or created in the future will be evaluated based on FIN No. 46 criteria, and such entities will be consolidated, if required. The analysis utilized by the Company in evaluating FIN No. 46 criteria involves considerable management judgment and assumptions.
      Deferred Costs, Net — Deferred loan costs are recorded at cost and amortized using the straight-line method over the terms of the related indebtedness, which approximates the effective interest method.

70


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Deferred franchise fees are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related franchise agreements.
      Due to/from Affiliates — Due to/from affiliates represents current receivables and payables resulting from transactions related to hotel management and project management with affiliated entities. Due from affiliates results primarily from advances of management fees. Due to affiliates results primarily from accrual of hotel management and project management fees. Both due to and due from affiliates are generally settled within a period not to exceed one year.
      Advertising Costs — Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For the year ended December 31, 2004 and the period from inception to December 31, 2003, the Company incurred advertising costs of approximately $425,000 and $30,000, respectively. For the period from January 1, 2003 to August 28, 2003 and for the year ended December 31, 2002, the Predecessor incurred advertising costs of approximately $48,000 and $143,000, respectively. Advertising costs are included in indirect expenses in the accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations.
      Indirect Expenses — Indirect expenses primarily include hotel-level general and administrative fees, sales and marketing expenses, repairs and maintenance expenses, franchise fees, and utility costs.
      Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended and interpreted (“SFAS No. 133”), establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. As required by SFAS No. 133, the Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.
      For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative and the hedged item related to the hedged risk are recognized in earnings. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings. The Company assesses the effectiveness of each hedging relationship by comparing the changes in fair value or cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the changes in fair value or cash flows of the designated hedged item or transaction.
      The Company’s objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements or other identified risks. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps and caps as part of its cash flow hedging strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts in exchange for fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying principal amount. Interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges provide the Company with interest rate protection above the strike rate on the cap and result in the Company receiving interest payments when rates are above the cap strike.
      Income Taxes — As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal corporate income tax on the portion of its net income (loss) that does not relate to taxable REIT subsidiaries. However, Ashford TRS is treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary for federal income tax purposes.
      Stock-based Compensation — The Company accounts for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic-value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued

71


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
to Employees.” In connection with the Company’s formation, the Company established an Employee Stock Plan (the “Stock Plan”). Under the Stock Plan, the Company has issued 784,717 shares of restricted common stock to its executives, directors, and certain employees of the Company and its affiliates and 10,000 shares of non-restricted common stock to its directors. Of the 784,717 restricted shares issued, 759,717 vest over three years and 25,000 vested over six months. Although the 10,000 non-restricted shares issued are immediately vested, these shares represent compensation for the subsequent year of service. All such shares are charged to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting or service period based on the Company’s stock price on the date of issuance. Under the Stock Plan, the Company may issue a variety of performance-based stock awards, including nonqualified stock options. As of December 31, 2004, no performance-based stock awards have been issued other than the restricted shares discussed above. Consequently, stock-based compensation as determined under the intrinsic-value method is the same under the fair-value method.
      Earnings (Loss) Per Share — Basic earnings (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive earnings (loss) per common share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common shares were exercised or converted into common shares, whereby such exercise or conversion would result in lower earnings per share.
      For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company reported nominal net income available to common shareholders. For the period from the Company’s inception to December 31, 2003, the Company reported a net loss. Consequently, the effects of the restricted shares of common stock, convertible preferred stock, and units of limited partnership interest outstanding during both of the aforementioned periods were anti-dilutive. Therefore, basic and dilutive earnings (loss) per common share were the same for those periods.
      Segments — The Company presently operates in two business segments within the hotel lodging industry: direct hotel investments and hotel financing. Direct hotel investments refers to owning hotels through either acquisition or new development. Hotel financing refers to owning subordinate hotel-related mortgage receivables through acquisition or origination. The Predecessor only operated within the direct hotel investments segment.
4. Concentrations of Risk
      The Company’s investments are all concentrated within the hotel industry. The Company’s current investment strategy is to acquire or develop mid to upscale hotels, acquire first mortgages on hotel properties, invest in other mortgage-related instruments such as mezzanine loans to hotel owners and operators, and participate in hotel sale-leaseback transactions. At present, all of the Company’s owned hotels or hotels securing the Company’s loans receivable are domestically located. Accordingly, adverse conditions in the hotel industry will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating and investment revenues and cash available for distribution to stockholders.
      In addition, the Company expects to originate or acquire additional mezzanine loans receivable. These types of mortgage loans involve a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage lending secured by income-producing real property due to a variety of factors, including the loan being entirely unsecured or, if secured, becoming unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. The Company may not recover some or all of its investment in these loans. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan-to-value ratios than conventional mortgage loans resulting in less equity in the property and increasing the risk of loss of principal.

72


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
5. Investment in Hotel Properties
      Investment in hotel properties consists of the following as of December 31, 2004 and 2003:
                   
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
Land
  $ 67,047,057     $ 28,652,386  
Buildings and improvements
    344,471,273       143,811,837  
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
    46,885,000       22,002,543  
             
 
Total cost
    458,403,330       194,466,766  
Accumulated depreciation
    (31,397,854 )     (20,742,768 )
             
 
Investment in hotel properties, net
  $ 427,005,476     $ 173,723,998  
             
      On August 29, 2003, in connection with the Company’s formation, the Company recorded a minority interest partial step-up of approximately $8.1 million to the historical net carrying values of four of its hotel properties as a result of the Company acquiring minority interest from unaffiliated parties.
      On October 8, 2003, the Company acquired five hotel properties from FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership (“FelCor”) for approximately $50.0 million in cash. Considering closing costs, this acquisition generated an increase in Investment in Hotel Properties of approximately $50.4 million.
      On November 24, 2003, the Company acquired four hotel properties from Noble Investment Group (“Noble”) for approximately $33.9 million, which included approximately $27.5 million in cash and approximately $6.4 million in assumed mortgage debt. Considering closing costs, this acquisition generated an increase in Investment in Hotel Properties of approximately $34.2 million.
      On March 24, 2004, the Company acquired a hotel property in Lake Buena Vista, Florida, from JHM Ruby Lake Hotel, Ltd. for approximately $25.6 million in cash. Considering closing costs, this acquisition generated an increase in Investment in Hotel Properties of approximately $25.4 million with the remainder of the purchase price related to working capital.
      On April 1, 2004, the Company acquired a hotel property in Atlantic Beach, Florida, from Huron Jacksonville Limited Partnership for approximately $23.1 million, which consisted of approximately $6.3 million in cash, approximately $15.7 million in assumed mortgage debt, and approximately $1.1 million worth of limited partnership units, which equates to 106,675 units based on the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. Considering closing costs, this acquisition generated an increase in Investment in Hotel Properties of approximately $23.3 million.
      On May 17, 2004, the Company acquired a hotel property in Baltimore, Maryland, from The Buccini/ Pollin Group for approximately $15.9 million, which included approximately $9.1 million in cash and approximately $6.8 million in assumed mortgage debt. Considering closing costs, this acquisition generated an increase in Investment in Hotel Properties of approximately $16.2 million.
      On July 7, 2004, the Company acquired a hotel property and adjacent office building in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from Household OPEB I, Inc. for approximately $16.7 million in cash. Considering closing costs, this acquisition generated an increase in Investment in Hotel Properties of approximately $14.7 million, with the remainder of the purchase price related to working capital or the office building, which is classified in assets held for sale at December 31, 2004.
      On July 23, 2004, the Company acquired four hotel properties from Day Hospitality Group for approximately $25.9 million in cash plus approximately $86,000 in additional cash to be paid no later than April 30, 2005 pursuant to a post-acquisition contingency. Considering closing costs, this acquisition generated

73


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
an increase in Investment in Hotel Properties of approximately $25.7 million with the remainder of the purchase price related to working capital.
      On September 2, 2004, the Company acquired nine hotel properties from Dunn Hospitality Group for approximately $62.0 million, which consisted of approximately $59.0 million in cash and approximately $3.0 million worth of limited partnership units, which equates to 333,333 units based on the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. Considering closing costs, this acquisition generated an increase in Investment in Hotel Properties of approximately $63.0 million.
      On October 1, 2004, the Company acquired the Hyatt Orange County hotel in Anaheim, California, from Atrium Plaza, LLC for approximately $81.0 million in cash, inclusive of the seller’s commitment to fund a $6.0 million renovation, which was completed in December 2004. Considering closing costs, this acquisition generated an increase in Investment in Hotel Properties of approximately $81.6 million.
      For the year ended December 31, 2004 and the period from inception through December 31, 2003, the Company recognized depreciation expense of approximately $10.7 million and $2.0 million, respectively. For the period from January 1, 2003 to August 28, 2003 and for the year ended December 31, 2002, the Predecessor recognized depreciation expense of approximately $2.9 million and $4.7 million, respectively.
6. Notes Receivable
      Notes receivable consists of the following as of December 31, 2004 and 2003:
                 
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
$10 million mezzanine loan secured by one hotel property, matures August 2006, at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 9% with a 2% LIBOR floor, with interest-only payments through August 2004 plus principal payments thereafter based on a twenty-five year amortization schedule
  $ 9,936,033     $ 10,000,000  
$15 million mezzanine loan secured by one hotel property, matures January 2006, at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 9%, with interest-only payments through maturity
    15,000,000        
$16.9 million mezzanine loan secured by 14 hotel properties, matures July 2005, at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 8.7% with a 2.5% LIBOR floor, with principal and interest payments due monthly based on a twenty-five year amortization schedule
    16,914,007        
$15 million mezzanine loan secured by one hotel property, matures April 2007, at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 10.25% with a 1.75% LIBOR floor and 5% LIBOR cap, with interest-only payments through maturity
    15,000,000        
$6.8 million mezzanine loan secured by one hotel property, matures January 2006, at an interest rate of the greater of 15% or LIBOR plus 13% with a 2% LIBOR floor (LIBOR plus 10% with 2% LIBOR floor pay rate with deferred interest through maturity), with interest-only payments through maturity
    6,811,509        
$11 million mezzanine loan secured by one hotel property, matures September 2011, at an interest rate of 14% (12% pay rate with deferred interest through the first two years), with interest only payments through maturity
    11,000,000        

74


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
                   
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
$5 million mezzanine loan secured by one hotel property, matures October 2006, at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 11.35%, with interest-only payments through maturity
    5,000,000        
             
 
Total
  $ 79,661,549     $ 10,000,000  
             
      Since November 26, 2003, the Company acquired or originated the $9.9 million, $15.0 million, $16.9 million, $15.0 million, $6.8 million, $11.0 million, and $5.0 million notes receivable, as described sequentially in the above table, on November 26, 2003, January 23, 2004, March 4, 2004, March 19, 2004, March 24, 2004, September 10, 2004, and September 30, 2004, respectively. In general, the Company’s notes receivable have extension options, prohibit prepayment through a certain period, and require decreasing prepayment penalties through maturity.
      During 2004, the Company received payments of approximately $8.1 million related to the portion of its $25.0 million mezzanine loan that was secured by three hotel properties. As a result of these prepayments, the $25.0 million mezzanine loan, originally secured by 17 hotel properties, became the aforementioned $16.9 million mezzanine loan, secured by 14 hotel properties.
      On September 30, 2004, the Company acquired a $10 million first-mortgage loan receivable, secured by one hotel property, with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.8%, maturing in October 2006, with interest-only payments through maturity. On December 9, 2004, the Company sold this note receivable at its par value.
      As of December 31, 2004, all notes receivable balances were current, and no reserve for loan losses has been recorded. For the year ended December 31, 2004 and the period from inception to December 31, 2003, the Company recognized interest income related to notes receivable of approximately $7.5 million and $110,000, respectively. The Predecessor did not maintain such notes receivable.
7. Deferred Costs
      Deferred costs consist of the following as of December 31, 2004 and 2003:
                   
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
Deferred loan costs
  $ 10,017,471     $ 1,429,634  
Deferred franchise fees
    2,103,800       1,205,000  
             
 
Total cost
    12,121,271       2,634,634  
Accumulated amortization
    (2,731,765 )     (247,697 )
             
 
Deferred costs, net
  $ 9,389,506     $ 2,386,937  
             
8. Indebtedness
      Indebtedness consists of the following as of December 31, 2004 and 2003:
                 
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
$210 million term loan secured by 25 hotel properties, matures October 10, 2006, at varying interest rates averaging LIBOR plus 1.95%, with interest-only payments due monthly, with three one-year extension options
  $ 210,000,000     $  

75


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
                   
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
$60 million secured credit facility secured by two hotel properties, matures August 17, 2007, at an interest rate of LIBOR plus a range of 2.0% to 2.3% depending on the loan-to-value ratio, with interest-only payments due monthly, with a commitment fee of 0.25% to 0.5% on the unused portion of the line payable quarterly, with two one-year extension options
    17,764,045        
$45.6 million secured credit facility secured by four mezzanine notes receivable totaling approximately $48.7 million, matures July 13, 2007, with no additional advances permitted in the final year, at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 6.25% with a 2% LIBOR floor, with interest-only payments due monthly through maturity, a commitment fee of 0.5% on the unused portion of the line after 180 days payable monthly, and an option to extend the revolving period by one year
    32,401,671        
Mortgage note payable secured by one hotel property, matures December 31, 2006, at an interest rate of the greater of LIBOR plus 3.5% or 5.5%, with interest-only payments due monthly plus principal payments of $20,000 due monthly beginning January 1, 2005, with a 1% mandatory exit fee and a 0.5% one-year extension fee
          16,000,000  
Mortgage note payable secured by five hotel properties, matures December 31, 2007, at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.25% with a 4.75% total floor, with interest-only payments due monthly plus principal payments of $57,000 due monthly beginning January 1, 2006, with a $180,000 mandatory exit fee and a 0.5% one-year extension fee
          27,800,000  
Mortgage note payable secured by one hotel property, matures January 1, 2006, at an interest rate of 7.08%, with principal and interest payments due monthly of approximately $46,000 and a 1% mandatory exit fee
    6,296,373       6,401,779  
Mortgage note payable secured by one hotel property, matures December 31, 2005, at an interest rate of 7.25%, with principal and interest payments due monthly of approximately $114,000
    15,498,080        
Mortgage note payable secured by one hotel property, matures April 1, 2011, at an interest rate of the average weekly yield for 30-day commercial paper plus 3.4%, with principal and interest payments due monthly, with the principal portion escalating from approximately $15,000 to approximately $53,000 by maturity
    11,839,025        
Mortgage note payable secured by two hotel properties, matures July 31, 2007, at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.5% with a 5% total floor, with interest-only payments due monthly plus principal payments of $25,000 due monthly beginning August 1, 2006, with two one-year extension options
    6,955,000        
             
 
Total
  $ 300,754,194     $ 50,201,779  
             
      At December 31, 2004 and 2003, LIBOR was 2.40% and 1.12%, respectively.
      On September 2, 2004, the Company executed a $210.0 million term loan, as discussed in the above table, and used the proceeds to repay three mortgage notes payable totaling approximately $57.8 million, pay down its $60.0 million secured credit facility by approximately $57.2 million, and pay down another mortgage note payable by approximately $12.6 million. These reductions in debt are discussed more specifically below. Unamortized loan costs associated with the repaid mortgage notes were approximately $1.6 million, which were expensed.

76


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      On August 29, 2003, in connection with the Company’s formation, the Company used a portion of the proceeds from its IPO to repay approximately $65.7 million of mortgage indebtedness secured by the initial properties.
      The $16.0 million mortgage note payable outstanding at December 31, 2003, was repaid upon completion of the aforementioned $210.0 million term loan. The balance outstanding at the time the loan was repaid was $16.0 million.
      On November 24, 2003, the Company acquired four hotel properties from Noble for approximately $33.9 million, which included approximately $27.5 million in cash and approximately $6.4 million in assumed mortgage debt. As of December 31, 2004, this mortgage note payable had an outstanding balance of approximately $6.3 million.
      On December 24, 2003, the Company executed a $36.0 million non-recourse loan secured by the five hotel properties it acquired from FelCor on October 8, 2003, of which approximately $27.8 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2003 due to a holdback provision of approximately $8.2 million earmarked for targeted capital expenditures related to these properties. Upon completion of the aforementioned $210.0 million term loan, this $36.0 million non-recourse loan had an outstanding balance of approximately $32.1 million, and was repaid.
      On February 5, 2004, the Company executed the $60.0 million secured credit facility, of which approximately $49.8 million of the proceeds were funded March 24, 2004 and the remainder was funded May 17, 2004. The credit facility allows for an increase to $75.0 million subject to certain conditions. Upon completion of the aforementioned $210.0 million term loan, the credit facility was paid down by approximately $57.2 million. On August 17, 2004, the Company modified this credit facility such that the interest rate was reduced from LIBOR plus 3.25% to LIBOR plus a range of 2.0% to 2.3% depending on the loan-to-value ratio, and maturity was extended from February 5, 2007 to August 17, 2007, with two one-year extension options. On October 1, 2004, in connection with the acquisition of a hotel property, the Company drew an additional $15.0 million on this credit facility.
      On April 1, 2004, in connection with the acquisition of a hotel property, the Company assumed a mortgage note payable of approximately $15.7 million, which matures December 31, 2005, as shown in the above table. As of December 31, 2004, this mortgage note payable had an outstanding balance of approximately $15.5 million.
      On May 17, 2004, in connection with the acquisition of a hotel property, the Company assumed a mortgage note payable of approximately $6.8 million, which matures April 1, 2011, as shown in the above table. On August 12, 2004, the Company increased this commitment by approximately $5.2 million and reduced the overall interest rate from the average weekly yield for 30-day commercial paper plus 3.5% to the average weekly yield for 30-day commercial paper plus 3.4%. As of December 31, 2004, this mortgage note payable had an outstanding balance of approximately $11.8 million.
      On July 7, 2004, the Company executed a $14.8 million mortgage note payable, secured by one hotel property, at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 3.5%, with a 5% total floor. The mortgage note payable had a maturity date of July 31, 2007 with two one-year extension options, with interest-only payments due monthly plus principal payments of $20,000 due monthly beginning July 1, 2006. Upon completion of the aforementioned $210.0 million term loan, this mortgage note payable was repaid. The balance outstanding at the time the loan was repaid was approximately $9.7 million.
      On July 14, 2004, the Company executed a $45.6 million credit facility, which matures July 13, 2007, as shown in the above table. Approximately $37.5 million of the proceeds were funded immediately. On August 26, 2004, the Company paid down approximately $4.6 million of this credit facility in connection with the partial payoff of one of the mezzanine notes receivable securing the facility.

77


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      On July 23, 2004, the Company executed a $19.6 million mortgage note payable, which matures July 31, 2007, as shown in the above table. Upon completion of the aforementioned $210.0 million term loan, this mortgage note payable was paid down approximately $12.6 million. As of December 31, 2004, this mortgage note payable had an outstanding balance of approximately $7.0 million.
      In addition, the Company’s $6.3 million, $15.5 million, and $11.8 million mortgage notes payable agreements generally require decreasing prepayment penalties through maturity.
      Maturities of indebtedness as of December 31, 2004 are as follows:
           
2005
  $ 16,093,979  
2006
    216,834,260  
2007
    57,537,264  
2008
    568,066  
2009
    595,881  
Thereafter
    9,124,744  
       
 
Total
  $ 300,754,194  
       
      The carrying values of assets collateralizing indebtedness as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 are as follows:
                         
        December 31,
         
Hotel Property   Location   2004   2003
             
Embassy Suites
    Austin, TX     $ 11,283,780 (d)      
Embassy Suites
    Dallas, TX       10,953,253 (d)      
Embassy Suites
    Herndon, VA       12,279,983 (d)      
Embassy Suites
    Las Vegas, NV       20,460,665 (d)   $ 20,923,229 (a)
Embassy Suites
    Phoenix, AZ       16,466,927 (d)     14,901,437 (b)
Embassy Suites
    Syracuse, NY       15,815,003 (d)     13,671,727 (b)
Embassy Suites
    Flagstaff, AZ       6,773,919 (d)     6,080,686 (b)
Radisson Hotel
    Holtsville, NY       22,234,750 (d)      
Doubletree Guest Suites
    Columbus, OH       10,010,276 (d)     9,536,429 (b)
Doubletree Guest Suites
    Dayton, OH       6,546,075 (d)     5,776,567 (b)
Hilton Garden Inn
    Jacksonville, FL       11,399,662 (c)     11,630,909 (c)
Homewood Suites
    Mobile, AL       8,931,144 (d)      
Hampton Inn
    Lawrenceville, GA       4,754,430 (e)      
Hampton Inn
    Evansville, IN       7,272,816 (d)      
Hampton Inn
    Terre Haute, IN       8,473,747 (d)      
Hampton Inn
    Horse Cave, KY       2,462,621 (d)      
Hampton Inn
    Buford, GA       6,449,379 (d)      
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
    Jacksonville, FL       8,817,918 (d)      
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
    Baltimore, MD       15,928,083 (g)      
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
    Kennesaw, GA       6,405,777 (h)      
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
    Buford, GA       7,459,871 (d)      
Fairfield Inn & Suites
    Kennesaw, GA       5,138,528 (h)      
Fairfield Inn by Marriott
    Evansville, IN       4,244,755 (d)      

78


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
                           
        December 31,
         
Hotel Property   Location   2004   2003
             
Fairfield Inn by Marriott
    Princeton, IN       1,221,324 (d)      
Courtyard by Marriott
    Bloomington, IN       11,949,273 (d)      
Courtyard by Marriott
    Columbus, IN       5,794,094 (d)      
Courtyard by Marriott
    Louisville, KY       14,601,371 (d)      
Marriott Residence Inn
    Lake Buena Vista, FL       24,781,165 (d)      
Marriott Residence Inn
    Evansville, IN       7,219,031 (d)      
Sea Turtle
    Altantic Beach, FL       22,762,048 (f)      
Sheraton Bucks County
    Langhorne, PA       15,754,515 (d)      
Hyatt Regency Orange County
    Anaheim, CA       80,986,928 (e)      
                   
 
Total
          $ 415,633,111     $ 82,520,984  
                   
 
(a)  Represents collateral for the $16.0 million mortgage note payable outstanding at December 31, 2003.
(b) Represents collateral for the $27.8 million mortgage note payable outstanding at December 31, 2003.
 
(c) Represents collateral for the $6.4 million mortgage note payable outstanding at December 31, 2003.
 
(d) Represents collateral for the $210.0 million term loan outstanding at December 31, 2004.
 
(e) Represents collateral for the $60.0 million credit facility outstanding at December 31, 2004.
 
(f) Represents collateral for the $15.5 million mortgage note payable outstanding at December 31, 2004.
 
(g) Represents collateral for the $11.8 million mortgage note payable outstanding at December 31, 2004.
 
(h) Represents collateral for the $7.0 million mortgage note payable outstanding at December 31, 2004.
      In addition to the above, the $45.6 million secured credit facility is secured by four mezzanine notes receivable totaling approximately $48.7 million as of December 31, 2004.
      If the Company violates covenants in any debt agreements, the Company could be required to repay all or a portion of its indebtedness before maturity at a time when the Company might be unable to arrange financing for such repayment on attractive terms, if at all. Violations of certain debt covenants may result in the Company being unable to borrow unused amounts under a line of credit, even if repayment of some or all borrowings is not required. In any event, financial covenants under the Company’s current or future debt obligations could impair the Company’s planned business strategies by limiting the Company’s ability to borrow (i) beyond certain amounts or (ii) for certain purposes. Presently, the Company’s existing financial debt covenants primarily relate to maintaining a minimum debt coverage ratio at a certain property, maintaining an overall minimum net worth, and maintaining an overall minimum total assets.
9. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
      On September 2, 2004, the Company purchased a 6.0% LIBOR interest rate cap with a $210.0 million notional amount to limit its exposure to rising interest rates on $210.0 million of its floating-rate debt. To partially offset the cost of the purchased cap, the Company sold a 6.0% LIBOR interest rate cap with a $105.0 million notional amount with identical terms to the purchased cap. Both interest rate caps mature October 2, 2006. The Company has designated the net purchased option of $105.0 million as a cash flow hedge of its exposure to changes in interest rates on a corresponding amount of variable-rate debt.
      On September 7, 2004, the Company entered into a $105.0 million stair-stepped interest rate swap agreement, at an average interest rate of 4.9% over the term of the swap, which matures March 1, 2007. The

79


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
interest rate swap effectively converts the interest payments on $105.0 million of the Company’s floating-rate debt to a fixed rate and has been designated as a cash flow hedge.
      As of December 31, 2004, no derivatives were designated as fair value hedges or hedges of net investments in foreign operations. Additionally, the Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes, and currently does not have any derivatives that are not designated as hedges.
      At December 31, 2004, derivatives with a fair value of approximately $712,000 were included in other assets, and derivatives with a fair value of approximately $90,000 were included in other liabilities. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the change in net unrealized gains/losses of approximately $555,000 for derivatives designated as cash flow hedges is separately disclosed as accumulated other comprehensive income in the consolidated statement of owners’ equity. During the year ended December 31, 2004, no hedge ineffectiveness was recognized.
      Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate debt. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the change in net unrealized gains/losses on cash flow hedges reflects a reclassification of approximately $100,000 from accumulated other comprehensive income to an increase in interest expense. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that approximately $421,000 will be reclassified from other comprehensive income existing at December 31, 2004, to a reduction to interest expense.
10. Employee Stock Grants
      Upon consummation of the IPO and subsequent exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment, the Company issued 714,317 shares of restricted common stock to its executives, directors, and certain employees of the Company and its affiliates. Of the 714,317 shares issued, 689,317 vest over three years and 25,000 vested over six months. The value of the shares is charged to compensation expense on a straight-line basis based on the IPO price of $9 per share.
      On March 15, 2004, the Company issued an additional 70,400 shares of restricted common stock to its executives and certain employees. These shares vest over three years, and the value of the shares is charged to compensation expense on a straight-line basis based on the closing price on the date of issuance of $10.41 per share.
      On May 19, 2004, the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock to its directors as compensation for serving on the Board through May 2005. These shares are immediately vested, and the value of these shares is charged to compensation expense over the year of service on a straight-line basis based on the closing price on the date of issuance of $8.90 per share.
      For the year ended December 31, 2004 and the period from inception through December 31, 2003, the Company recognized compensation expense of approximately $2.4 million and $864,000, respectively, related to these shares.
11. Preferred Stock
      In accordance with the Company’s charter, the Company is authorized to issue a total of 50 million shares of preferred stock, which includes both Series A cumulative preferred stock and Series B cumulative convertible redeemable preferred stock.
      Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock — On September 22, 2004, the Company issued 2,300,000 shares of 8.55% Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock at $25 per share, which generated gross proceeds of approximately $57.5 million. However, the aggregate proceeds to the Company, net of underwriters’ discount and offering costs, was approximately $55.0 million.

80


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      Series A preferred stock has no maturity date, and the Company is not required to redeem the shares at any time. Prior to September 22, 2009, Series A preferred stock is not redeemable, except in certain limited circumstances relating to the ownership limitation necessary to preserve the Company’s qualification as a REIT. However, on and after September 22, 2009, Series A preferred stock will be redeemable at the Company’s option for cash, in whole or from time to time in part, at a redemption price of $25 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, at the redemption date. In general, the holders of Series A preferred stock have no voting rights.
      Series A preferred stock dividends are cumulative from the date of original issuance and are payable quarterly, when and as declared, commencing on January 18, 2005 at the rate of 8.55% per annum of the $25 liquidation preference (equivalent to an annual dividend rate of $2.1375 per share). Dividends are payable on the 15th day of January, April, July, and October of each year, or if such day is not a business day, the next succeeding business day. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company accrued Series A preferred stock dividends payable of approximately $1.4 million.
      Series B Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock — On December 27, 2004, the Company entered into a Series B Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement for the sale of up to $75.0 million in Series B cumulative convertible redeemable preferred stock of the Company to a financial institution. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, the financial institution may purchase up to 5,162,000 shares of Series B-1 Preferred Stock of the Company and up to 2,285,865 shares of Series B-2 Preferred Stock of the Company, in each case at a per-share price of $10.07, which was determined using a 20-day average closing price calculated five business days prior to execution of the agreement. The two series of preferred stock are identical except with respect to voting rights and convertibility features and are referred to herein collectively as Series B Preferred Stock.
      Each share of Series B-1 Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time into the number of shares of common stock of the Company obtained by dividing $10.07 by the conversion price then in effect. The initial conversion price of the Class B-1 Preferred Stock is $10.07, subject to certain adjustments, as defined. Series B-2 Preferred Stock will automatically convert into Series B-1 Preferred Stock on a share-for-share basis immediately upon the earliest to occur of (i) approval of the stockholders of the Company as required by the applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange or (ii) a determination by the board of directors of the Company that such stockholder vote is not required.
      Series B-1 Preferred Stock holders are entitled to vote, on an as-converted basis voting as a single class together with the holders of common stock, on all matters to be voted on by the Company’s stockholders. Series B-2 Preferred Stock holders have no voting rights.
      Series B Preferred Stock is redeemable for cash at the option of the Company at the liquidation preference, which is set at $10.07, after three years (or two years if certain criteria, as defined, are met). Series B Preferred Stock is redeemable for cash at the option of the holder at a specified redemption price, as defined, if certain events occur.
      The Series B preferred dividend for all such shares issued is set at the greater of $0.14 per share, or the prevailing common stock dividend plus, in the case of Series B-2 Preferred Stock, an additional dividend of $0.05015 per share beginning January 1, 2009, if (i) the conversion of Series B-2 Preferred Stock into Series B-1 Preferred Stock has not been completed and (ii) the price at which the common stock of the Company is then trading exceeds $10.07 per share.
      The $75.0 million preferred stock private placement is a two-stage transaction. The first tranche is for the sale of $20.0 million in Series B Preferred Stock. The initial $10.0 million funded on December 30, 2004, representing 993,049 shares of Series B-1 Preferred Stock, and the remaining $10.0 million will be available for disbursement by June 30, 2005. The second tranche is for the sale of $55.0 million in Series B Preferred Stock. Of the second tranche, $34.7 million can be funded, at the financial institution’s election, on June 30,

81


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
2005 if the Company has not given notice to the financial institution of its intent to sell $34.7 million of the second tranche by June 15, 2005. The remainder of the second tranche will be available for disbursement by December 23, 2005. Proceeds from the issuance of the initial 993,049 shares of Series B-1 Preferred Stock were used to partially fund a 21-property acquisition, which closed on March 16, 2005, and the Company will continue to sell preferred stock under this purchase agreement over time to fund general corporate purposes, new acquisitions, or debt repayment.
      For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company accrued Series B preferred stock dividends payable of approximately $3,300.
12. Income Taxes
      The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that the Company distribute at least 90% its taxable income to its stockholders. The Company currently intends to adhere to these requirements and maintain its REIT status. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income as well as to federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income.
      For the year ended December 31, 2004 and the period from inception to December 31, 2003, the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiary recognized net book income of approximately $1.7 million and $83,000, respectively, and a provision for income taxes of approximately $658,000 and $142,000, respectively.
      The following table reconciles the provision for income taxes at statutory rates to the actual provision for income taxes recorded for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the period from inception to December 31, 2003:
                   
    Year Ended   Period from
    December 31,   August 29, 2003 to
    2004   December 31, 2003
         
Provision for income taxes at 35% statutory rate
  $ 584,099     $ 29,050  
State income taxes, net of Federal benefit
    96,543       5,007  
Valuation allowance
    (108,121 )     108,121  
Other
    85,752        
             
 
Provision for income taxes
  $ 658,273     $ 142,178  
             
      For the Predecessor, no provision for income taxes was recognized as each partner was individually responsible for reporting its respective share of partnership taxable income or loss.
      For the year ended December 31, 2004 and the period from inception to December 31, 2003, taxable loss for the REIT is projected to be approximately $970,000 and $818,000, respectively. The REIT is not subject to the distribution requirement for years with taxable losses.

82


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company’s deferred tax asset and related valuation allowance consisted of the following:
                   
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
Allowance for doubtful accounts
  $ 24,116     $ 9,523  
Accrued expenses
    376,817       98,598  
             
 
Gross deferred tax asset
    400,933       108,121  
 
Valuation allowance
          (108,121 )
             
 
Net deferred tax asset
  $ 400,933     $  
             
      At December 31, 2004, deferred tax assets are included in other assets. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had fully reserved its deferred tax asset due to its limited operational history.
      For the year ended December 31, 2004 and the period from inception through December 31, 2003, components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:
                     
    Year Ended   Period from
    December 31,   August 29, 2003 to
    2004   December 31, 2003
         
Current:
               
 
Federal
  $ 931,128     $ 137,171  
 
State
    128,078       5,007  
             
   
Total current
    1,059,206       142,178  
Deferred:
               
 
Federal
    (369,398 )      
 
State
    (31,535 )      
             
   
Total deferred
    (400,933 )      
             
   
Provision for income taxes
  $ 658,273     $ 142,178  
             
13. Minority Interest
      Minority interest in the operating partnership represents the limited partners’ proportionate share of the equity in the operating partnership. Net income (loss) is allocated to minority interest based on the weighted average limited partnership percentage ownership throughout the period. Upon formation of the Company on August 29, 2003, and subsequent exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option on September 26, 2003, the Company issued 5,657,917 units of limited partnership interest to affiliates. On April 1, 2004, the Company issued an additional 106,675 units of limited partnership interest in connection with the acquisition of a hotel property. On September 2, 2004, the Company issued an additional 333,333 units of limited partnership interest in connection with the acquisition of nine hotel properties.
      As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, these units of limited partnership interest represent a 19.11% and 18.03% minority interest ownership, respectively. Beginning one year after issuance, each unit of limited partnership interest may be redeemed for either cash or one share of the Company’s common stock at the Company’s discretion. To date, no units of limited partnership interest have been redeemed.

83


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
14. Related Party Transactions
      Under previous agreements with affiliates owned by the Company’s Chairman and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Director, the Predecessor was obligated to pay such affiliates management fees of 3%-4.5% of gross revenues, as defined by the agreements, and to reimburse such affiliates for certain accounting and administrative expenses. Under related management agreements, the Predecessor was obligated to pay a fee equal to 8% of all invoiced third-party expenditures necessary for the replacement of furniture, fixtures, and equipment, and for building repairs.
      Upon formation of the Company on August 29, 2003, the Company became obligated to pay such affiliates a) monthly management fees equal to the greater of $10,000 or 3% of gross revenues as well as an annual incentive management fee, if certain operational criteria are met, b) market service fees on the approved capital improvements, including project management fees of up to 4% of project costs, and c) other reimbursements as approved by the Company’s independent directors.
      Under these agreements, the Company or its Predecessor incurred the following amounts during the year ended December 31, 2004, the period from inception to December 31, 2003, the period from January 1, 2003 to August 28, 2003, and the year ended December 31, 2002:
                                   
    The Company   The Company   The Predecessor   The Predecessor
                 
        Period from   Period from    
    Year Ended   August 29, 2003 to   January 1, 2003 to   Year Ended
    December 31, 2004   December 31, 2003   August 28, 2003   December 31, 2002
                 
Management fees(a)
  $ 3,395,106     $ 651,480     $ 718,408     $ 1,059,867  
Market service and project management fees
    1,237,358             55,266       122,734  
Special Limited Partner fees(b)
                506,307       658,925  
Other reimbursements
    799,837       217,298       356,612       491,032  
                         
 
Total
  $ 5,432,301     $ 868,778     $ 1,636,593     $ 2,332,558  
                         
 
(a)  For year ended December 31, 2004 and the period from inception to December 31, 2003, the above table includes management fees of approximately $975,000 and $25,000, respectively, related to third party managers who are not related parties. As of December 31, 2004, these third parties manage 19 of the Company’s 33 hotels. For the year ended December 31, 2004 and the period from inception to December 31, 2003, the Company also incurred incentive fees to related parties of approximately $438,000 and $0, respectively, which are included in indirect hotel operating expenses.
(b) Upon formation of the Company on August 29, 2003 and related redemption of the Company’s interest in its Special Limited Partner, the Special Limited Partner fee ceased to exist.
      The management agreement with an affiliate includes an exclusivity clause that requires the Company to engage the affiliate, unless the Company’s independent directors either (i) unanimously vote to hire a different manager or developer, or (ii) by a majority vote, elect not to engage the affiliate because special circumstances exist or, based on the affiliate’s prior performance, it is believed that another manager or developer could materially improve the performance of the duties.
      In addition to the above, these affiliates also pay for certain corporate general and administrative expenses on behalf of the Company, including rent, payroll, office supplies, and travel. Such charges are allocated to the Company based on various methodologies, including headcount, office space, usage, and actual amounts incurred. For the year ended December 31, 2004 and the period from inception to December 31, 2003, such

84


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
costs were approximately $809,000 and $833,000, respectively, which are reimbursed by the Company monthly.
      During the period from inception to December 31, 2003, these affiliates also paid approximately $55,000 in fees associated with the Company’s initial public offering and $500,000 related to an earnest money deposit on an acquisition, which were reimbursed by the Company prior to December 31, 2003.
      In addition, the Company agreed to indemnify certain affiliates, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Director and the Company’s Chairman, who contributed properties in connection with the Company’s initial public offering in exchange for operating partnership units against the income tax that such affiliates may incur if the Company disposes of one of these properties.
      On October 16, 2003, the Company exercised its option to reassign its rights under its eight asset management and consulting contracts back to one of these affiliates until January 1, 2004 in order to meet REIT eligible-income thresholds in 2003. As a result, the Company forewent related asset management fee income over this period of approximately $250,000. However, the related guarantee of payment associated with these fees, which are $1.2 million annually for five years, was extended for a like period.
      In May 2004, the Company engaged a financial services firm to act as a financial advisor in obtaining permanent financing related to various hotel properties. A Company board member is an employee and principal of this firm, and the engagement of such firm was approved by the Company’s board of directors. In September 2004, the Company paid the financial services firm approximately $707,000 related to this agreement.
15. Commitments and Contingencies
      Restricted Cash — Under existing mortgage loan agreements, the Company is obligated to escrow payments for insurance, real estate taxes, and debt service. In addition, for certain properties with debt, the Company is obligated to escrow 4% of gross revenue for capital improvements.
      Franchise Fees — Under the existing franchise agreements, the Company is obligated to pay the franchisors royalty fees between 2.5% and 5% of gross room revenue, and fees for marketing, reservations, and other related activities aggregating between 1% and 3.75% of gross room revenue. These franchise agreements expire beginning in 2011 through 2024. When a franchise term expires, the franchisor has no obligation to issue a new franchise. The loss of a franchise could have a material adverse effect on the operations or the underlying value of the affected hotel because of the loss of associated name recognition, marketing support, and centralized reservation systems provided by the franchisor. The loss of a franchise could also have a material adverse effect on cash available for distribution to stockholders. In addition, if the Company terminates a franchise prior to its expiration date, the Company may be required to pay up to three times the average annual franchise fees incurred for that property.
      For the year ended December 31, 2004 and for the period from inception to December 31, 2003, the Company incurred franchise fees of approximately $6.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively. For the period from January 1, 2003 to August 28, 2003 and for the year ended December 31, 2002, the Predecessor incurred franchise fees of approximately $1.6 million and $2.2 million, respectively. Franchise fees are included in indirect operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated and combined statements of operations.
      Management Fees — Under the existing management agreements, the Company is obligated to pay a) monthly management fees equal to the greater of $10,000 or 3% of gross revenues, or in some cases just 3% of gross revenues, as well as an annual incentive management fee, if applicable, b) market service fees on the approved capital improvements, including project management fees of up to 4% of project costs, for certain hotels, and c) other general fees at current market rates as approved by the Company’s independent directors. These management agreements expire beginning in 2006 through 2022, with renewal options on those related

85


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
to affiliates of up to twenty-five additional years. In addition, if the Company terminates a management agreement on one of the initial properties prior to its expiration due to sale of the property, the Company may be required to pay all estimated management fees due under the management agreement’s remaining term. This termination fee may be avoided in certain circumstances by substitution of a similar property. If the Company terminates a management agreement on one of the hotels acquired after the Company’s formation, or on one of the initial properties for reasons other than sale of the property, the Company may be required to pay estimated management fees ranging from one to six years from the termination date or substitute a new management agreement related to a different hotel.
      Leases — The Company has entered into noncancelable operating leases related to certain equipment, land, and facilities, which expire between 2005 and 2020, including a land lease and an air lease, each related to one hotel property. The air lease is subject to base rent plus contingent rent based on the related property’s net operating income. For the year ended December 31, 2004 and for the period from inception to December 31, 2003, the Company recognized total rent expense of approximately $615,000 and $164,000, respectively. For the period from January 1, 2003 to August 28, 2003 and for the year ended December 31, 2002, the Predecessor recognized total rent expense of approximately $150,000 and $203,000, respectively. The Company also owns equipment acquired under capital leases, included in Investment in Hotel Properties, which expire between 2006 and 2007, and have interest rates ranging between 10.0% and 10.3%.
      As of December 31, 2004, future minimum annual commitments for noncancelable lease agreements are as follows:
                   
    Operating   Capital
    Leases   Leases
         
2005
  $ 591,591     $ 156,197  
2006
    499,593       153,481  
2007
    456,483       38,756  
2008
    413,891        
2009
    409,106        
Thereafter
    13,343,864        
             
 
Total future minimum lease payments
  $ 15,714,528     $ 348,434  
             
 
Less amounts representing interest
            35,850  
             
 
Present value of future minimum lease payments
          $ 312,584  
             
      As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, assets acquired under capital leases consist of the following:
                   
    December 31,
     
    2004   2003
         
Assets under capital leases
  $ 694,179     $ 832,839  
Accumulated depreciation
    (378,764 )     (299,278 )
             
 
Assets under capital leases, net
  $ 315,415     $ 533,561  
             
      At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company also had capital commitments of approximately $2.6 million and $355,000, respectively, related to general capital improvements.
      Common Stock Dividends — On March 15, 2004, the Company declared a cash dividend of approximately $1.9 million, or $0.06 per diluted share, for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on March 31, 2004, which was paid April 15, 2004. On June 16, 2004, the Company declared a cash dividend of approximately $3.2 million, or $0.10 per diluted share, for common shareholders and units of

86


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
limited partnership of record on June 30, 2004, which was paid July 15, 2004. On September 13, 2004, the Company declared a cash dividend of approximately $4.5 million, or $0.14 per diluted share, for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on September 30, 2004, which was paid October 15, 2004. On December 15, 2004, the Company declared a cash dividend of approximately $4.8 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on December 31, 2004, which was paid January 18, 2005.
      Series A Preferred Stock Dividends — On December 17, 2004, the Company declared a cash dividend of approximately $1.4 million, or $0.5878 per diluted share, for Series A preferred shareholders of record on December 31, 2004, which was paid January 18, 2005.
      Series B Preferred Stock Dividends — The dividend is set at the greater of $0.14 per share or the prevailing common stock dividend, plus, in the case of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock, an additional dividend of $0.05015 per share beginning January 1, 2009, if (i) the conversion of the Series B-2 Preferred Stock into Series B-1 Preferred Stock has not been completed and (ii) the price at which the common stock of the Company is then trading exceeds $10.07 per share.
      Future Equity Issuances — On December 27, 2004, the Company executed a Series B Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement for the sale of Series B cumulative convertible redeemable preferred stock of the Company to a financial institution. Pursuant to the purchase agreement and subsequent amendment, this financial institution has certain participation rights with respect to any sale of equity securities by the Company.
      Insurance Losses — During August and September of 2004, four hurricanes caused significant damage throughout Florida and neighboring states. As a result, the Company’s four properties in that region experienced varying levels of property damage and business interruption. On July 20, 2004, the Company’s Radisson Hotel in Covington, Kentucky, experienced a fire on one of its hotel floors. As a result, this hotel was subsequently closed for approximately three days due to lack of electrical power. Although the Company’s insurance covers both property damage and business-interruption losses, the Company is liable for uninsured losses below its deductibles. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company accrued approximately $160,000 related to property damage associated with these events, and estimates that it lost an additional $340,000 related to business interruption.
      Employment Agreements — The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain executive officers, which provide for minimum annual base salaries, other fringe benefits, and non-compete clauses as determined by the board of directors. The agreements have varying terms expiring between December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2007, with automatic one-year renewals, unless terminated by either party upon six months’ notice, subject to severance provisions.
      Employee Incentive Plan — Effective December 2003, the Company created an Employee Savings and Incentive Plan (“ESIP”), a nonqualified compensation plan that covers all employees who work at least 25 hours per week. The ESIP allows employees to contribute up to 100% of their compensation to various investment funds. The Company matches 25% of the first 10% each employee contributes. Employee contributions vest immediately, whereas Company contributions vest 25% annually. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company’s matching fund had investment assets and a related liability to participating employees of approximately $51,000 and $3,000, respectively. During the year ended December 31 2004, the Company incurred administrative fees associated with maintaining the ESIP of approximately $7,000. During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company incurred nominal administrative fees associated with maintaining the ESIP.
      Acquisition Contingency — On July 23, 2004, the Company acquired four hotel properties from Day Hospitality Group for approximately $25.9 million in cash plus a contingent component based on the 2004 performance of the four acquired hotels to be paid, if earned, no later than April 30, 2005. As of December 31,

87


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
2004, the Company had accrued approximately $86,000 related to this contingent payment based on its interpretation of the acquisition agreement. However, Day Hospitality Group has disputed this amount. Presently, the ultimate outcome of this dispute is not determinable.
      Litigation — The Company is currently subject to litigation arising in the normal course of its business. In the opinion of management, none of these lawsuits or claims against the Company, either individually or in the aggregate, is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, or financial condition. In addition, management believes the Company has adequate insurance in place to cover such litigation.
      Taxes — Under tax indemnification agreements, the Company agreed for a period of ten years to use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain non-recourse mortgage indebtedness in the amount of at least $16.0 million, which will allow the contributors of the initial properties to defer recognition of gain in connection with the contribution of the Las Vegas Embassy Suites hotel property as part of the Company’s formation. Additionally, the Company is prohibited from selling or transferring the Sea Turtle Inn hotel property in Atlantic Beach, Florida, until April 1, 2007 if, as a result, the former owner of the property would recognize gain for federal tax purposes. If the Company sells or transfers this property after April 1, 2007, but prior to April 1, 2009, and the sale or transfer results in the former owner having to recognize gain for federal tax purposes, the Company must pay $180,000 to the former owner. However, this amount will be reduced by $7,500 for each passing month from April 1, 2007 until April 1, 2009.
16. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
      As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, amounts due from or to affiliates, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the carrying values of notes receivable, indebtedness, and capital leases payable approximates their fair values because the interest rates on these on these financial instruments are variable or approximate current interest rates charged on similar financial instruments.
      As of December 31, 2004, the Company’s $300.8 million debt portfolio consisted of approximately $279.0 million of outstanding variable-rate debt and approximately $21.8 million of outstanding of fixed-rate debt, with interest rates ranging from 7.08% to 7.25%. As discussed below, $105.0 million of the variable-rate debt was converted to fixed-rate debt via an interest rate swap. As of December 31, 2004, the Company owned approximately $79.7 million of variable-rate loans receivable.
      On September 2, 2004, the Company purchased a 6.0% LIBOR interest rate cap with a $210.0 million notional amount to limit its exposure to rising interest rates on $210.0 million of its floating-rate debt. To partially offset the cost of the purchased cap, the Company sold a 6.0% LIBOR interest rate cap with a $105.0 million notional amount with identical terms to the purchased cap. Hence, the Company owns a net interest rate cap with a $105.0 million notional amount. Both the purchased and sold interest rate caps mature October 2, 2006.
      On September 7, 2004, the Company entered into a $105.0 million stair-stepped interest rate swap agreement, at an average interest rate of 4.9% over the term of the swap, which matures March 1, 2007. The interest rate swap effectively converts the interest payments on $105.0 million of floating-rate debt to a fixed rate.
      At December 31, 2004, derivatives with a fair value of approximately $712,000 were included in other assets, and derivatives with a fair value of approximately $90,000 were included in other liabilities.
      Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize

88


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
17. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
      For the year ended December 31, 2004 and for the period from inception to December 31, 2003, interest paid by the Company was approximately $9.6 million and $568,000, respectively. For the period from January 1, 2003 to August 28, 2003, and for the year ended December 31, 2002, interest paid by the Predecessor was approximately $4.1 million and $5.7 million, respectively.
      During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company recorded the following non-cash transactions: a) on March 15, 2004, the Company issued 70,400 shares of restricted common stock to its executives and certain employees, b) on April 1, 2004, the Company assumed approximately $15.7 million in mortgage debt related to the acquisition of a hotel property, c) on April 1, 2004, the Company issued 106,675 units of limited partnership interest related to the acquisition of a hotel property, d) on May 17, 2004, the Company assumed approximately $6.8 million in mortgage debt related to the acquisition of a hotel property, e) on May 19, 2004, the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock to its directors, f) on September 2, 2004, the Company issued 333,333 units of limited partnership interest related to the acquisition of nine hotel properties, g) on December 15, 2004, the Company declared a cash dividend of approximately $4.8 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on December 31, 2004, which was paid January 18, 2005, and h) on December 17, 2004, the Company declared a cash dividend of approximately $1.4 million, or $0.5878 per diluted share, for Series A preferred shareholders of record on December 31, 2004, which was paid January 18, 2005.
      During the year ended December 31, 2003, in connection with the Company’s formation on August 29, 2003 and subsequent exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment, the Company recorded non-cash transactions as follows: a) contribution of initial properties with an historical net book value of approximately $82.6 million, b) an approximate $8.1 million minority interest partial step-up to the historical net carrying values of its hotel properties resulting from the acquisition of unaffiliated minority interest partners, c) an approximate $3.3 million forgiveness of debt, d) an approximate $16.0 million assumption of debt from the Predecessor, and e) the issuance of 714,317 shares of restricted stock to Company executives, employees, affiliates, and directors. In connection with the Company’s acquisition of four hotel properties from Noble on November 24, 2003, the Company recorded a non-cash assumption of approximately $6.4 million in mortgage debt.
18. Segments Reporting
      The Company presently operates in two business segments within the hotel lodging industry: direct hotel investments and hotel financing. Direct hotel investments refers to owning hotels through either acquisition or new development. Hotel financing refers to owning subordinate hotel-related mortgages through acquisition or origination. The Predecessor only operated within the direct hotel investments segment.

89


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      The Company does not allocate certain corporate-level accounts to its operating segments, including corporate general and administrative expenses, interest income, interest expense, provision for income taxes, and minority interest. For the year ended December 31, 2004, financial information related to the Company’s reportable segments was as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004:
                                     
    Direct Hotel   Hotel        
    Investments   Financing   Corporate   Consolidated
                 
Total revenues
  $ 109,375,617     $ 7,549,445     $     $ 116,925,062  
Operating expenses
    79,528,150                   79,528,150  
Depreciation and amortization
    10,767,785                   10,767,785  
Corporate general and administrative
                11,854,944       11,854,944  
                         
   
Operating income (loss)
    19,079,682       7,549,445       (11,854,944 )     14,774,183  
Interest income
                335,495       335,495  
Interest expense
                (9,217,377 )     (9,217,377 )
Amortization of loan costs
                (1,883,841 )     (1,883,841 )
Write-off of loan costs
                (1,633,369 )     (1,633,369 )
                         
 
Income (loss) before minority interest and provision for income taxes
    19,079,682       7,549,445       (24,254,036 )     2,375,091  
Provision for income taxes
                (658,273 )     (658,273 )
Minority interest
                (297,611 )     (297,611 )
                         
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 19,079,682     $ 7,549,445     $ (25,209,920 )   $ 1,419,207  
                         
      For the year ended December 31, 2003, financial information related to the Company’s reportable segments was as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003:
                                     
    Direct Hotel   Hotel        
    Investments   Financing   Corporate   Consolidated
                 
Total revenues
  $ 42,168,601     $ 110,000     $     $ 42,278,601  
Operating expenses
    32,767,868                   32,767,868  
Depreciation and amortization
    4,932,676                   4,932,676  
Corporate general and administrative
                4,002,950       4,002,950  
                         
   
Operating income (loss)
    4,468,057       110,000       (4,002,950 )     575,107  
Interest income
                289,133       289,133  
Interest expense
                (4,599,512 )     (4,599,512 )
Amortization of loan costs
                (400,694 )     (400,694 )
                         
 
Income (loss) before minority interest and provision for income taxes
    4,468,057       110,000       (8,714,023 )     (4,135,966 )
Provision for income taxes
                (142,178 )     (142,178 )
Minority interest
                357,943       357,943  
                         
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 4,468,057     $ 110,000     $ (8,498,258 )   $ (3,920,201 )
                         
      As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, aside from the Company’s portfolio of mezzanine notes receivable of approximately $79.7 million and $10.0 million, respectively, all assets of the Company primarily relate to the

90


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
direct hotel investments segment. In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, all capital expenditures incurred by the Company relate to the direct hotel investments segment.
19. Business Combinations
      On October 8, 2003, the Company acquired five hotel properties from FelCor for approximately $50.0 million in cash. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of FelCor since the date of acquisition. The purchase price was the result of an arms’ length negotiation. Annualized revenues of these five hotel properties are approximately $26.0 million. The Company used a portion of the proceeds from its IPO to fund the acquisition of these properties.
      On November 24, 2003, the Company acquired four hotel properties from Noble for approximately $33.9 million, which included approximately $27.5 million in cash and approximately $6.4 million in assumed mortgage debt. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of Noble since the date of acquisition. The purchase price was the result of an arms’ length negotiation. Annualized revenues of these four hotel properties are approximately $9.1 million. The Company used a portion of the proceeds from its IPO to fund the acquisition of these properties.
      On March 24, 2004, the Company acquired a hotel property in Lake Buena Vista, Florida, from JHM Ruby Lake Hotel, Ltd. (“Marriott Residence Inn”) for approximately $25.6 million in cash. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of the acquired hotel since the date of acquisition. The purchase price was the result of an arms’ length negotiation. Annualized revenue of the acquired hotel is approximately $5.8 million. The Company used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
      On April 1, 2004, the Company acquired a hotel property in Atlantic Beach, Florida, from Huron Jacksonville Limited Partnership (“Sea Turtle Inn”) for approximately $23.1 million, which consisted of approximately $6.3 million in cash, approximately $15.7 million in assumed mortgage debt, and approximately $1.1 million worth of limited partnership units, which equates to 106,675 units based on the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of the acquired hotel since the date of acquisition. The purchase price was the result of an arms’ length negotiation. Annualized revenue of the acquired hotel is approximately $9.1 million. The Company used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
      On May 17, 2004, the Company acquired a hotel property in Baltimore, Maryland, from The Buccini/ Pollin Group (“SpringHill Suites”) for approximately $15.9 million, which consisted of approximately $9.1 million in cash and approximately $6.8 million in assumed mortgage debt. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of the acquired hotel since the date of acquisition. The purchase price was the result of an arms’ length negotiation. Annualized revenue of the acquired hotel is approximately $3.9 million. The Company used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
      On July 7, 2004, the Company acquired a hotel property and adjacent office building in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from Household OPEB I, Inc. (“Sheraton Bucks County”) for approximately $16.7 million in cash. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of the acquired property since the date of acquisition. The purchase price was the result of an arms’ length negotiation. Annualized revenue of the acquired hotel is approximately $9.0 million, while the adjacent office building has one tenant with nominal operations. The Company used proceeds from borrowings to fund this acquisition.
      On July 23, 2004, the Company acquired four hotel properties from Day Hospitality Group (“Day”) for approximately $25.9 million in cash plus approximately $86,000 in additional cash to be paid no later than April 30, 2005 pursuant to a post-acquisition contingency. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of the acquired hotels since the date of acquisition. The purchase price was the result of an arms’ length negotiation. Annualized revenues of these four hotel properties are approximately $7.8 million. The Company used proceeds from borrowings to fund the acquisition of these properties.

91


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      On September 2, 2004, the Company acquired nine hotel properties from Dunn Hospitality Group (“Dunn”) for approximately $62.0 million, which consisted of approximately $59.0 million in cash and approximately $3.0 million worth of limited partnership units, which equates to 333,333 units based on the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of the acquired hotels since the date of acquisition. The purchase price was the result of an arms’ length negotiation. Annualized revenues of these nine hotel properties are approximately $20.1 million. The Company used proceeds from borrowings to fund the acquisition of these properties.
      On October 1, 2004, the Company acquired the Hyatt Orange County hotel in Anaheim, California, from Atrium Plaza, LLC (“Hyatt Orange County”) for approximately $81.0 million in cash, inclusive of the seller’s commitment to fund a $6.0 million renovation, which was completed in December 2004. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of the acquired hotels since the date of acquisition. The purchase price was the result of an arms’ length negotiation. Annualized revenue of the acquired hotel is approximately $27.8 million. The Company used proceeds from borrowings and from the issuance of Series A preferred stock to fund this acquisition.
      In connection with these acquisitions, the Company did not assign any value to goodwill or other intangible assets. In addition, purchase price allocations related to certain 2004 acquisitions are preliminary subject to further internal review and third-party appraisals.
      For acquisitions completed during the year ended December 31, 2004, a condensed balance sheet showing the amounts assigned to each major asset or liability caption related to these acquisitions follows:
For Acquisitions Completed in 2004:
                                                                   
    Marriott       Spring Hill   Sheraton           Hyatt    
    Residence Inn   Sea Turtle Inn   Suites   Bucks County   Day   Dunn   Orange County   Total
                                 
Investment in hotel properties
  $ 25,441,897     $ 23,259,276     $ 16,167,608     $ 14,676,331     $ 25,668,508     $ 62,957,761     $ 81,594,713     $ 249,766,094  
Restricted cash
          300,398             332,185       334,641                   967,224  
Assets held for sale
                      2,881,912                         2,881,912  
Other assets
    198,627       375,973       254,483       433,054       481,529       809,809       298,649       2,852,124  
                                                 
 
Total assets acquired
  $ 25,640,524     $ 23,935,647     $ 16,422,091     $ 18,323,482     $ 26,484,678     $ 63,767,570     $ 81,893,362     $ 256,467,354  
                                                 
Indebtedness
  $     $ 15,674,577     $ 6,820,636     $     $     $     $     $ 22,495,213  
Other liabilities
    49,521       256,631       47,506       141,325       226,744       1,110,081       1,338,823       3,170,631  
                                                 
 
Total liabilities assumed
    49,521       15,931,208       6,868,142       141,325       226,744       1,110,081       1,338,823       25,665,844  
Minority interest
          1,073,359                         3,013,330             4,086,689  
Cash paid, including closing costs
    25,591,003       6,931,080       9,553,949       18,182,157       26,257,934       59,644,159       80,554,539       226,714,821  
                                                 
 
Total cash paid, liabilities assumed, and operating partnership units issued
  $ 25,640,524     $ 23,935,647     $ 16,422,091     $ 18,323,482     $ 26,484,678     $ 63,767,570     $ 81,893,362     $ 256,467,354  
                                                 

92


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
      For acquisitions completed during the year ended December 31, 2003, a condensed balance sheet showing the amounts assigned to each major asset or liability caption related to these acquisitions follows:
For Acquisitions Completed in 2003:
                           
    FelCor   Noble   Total
             
Investment in hotel properties
  $ 50,428,838     $ 34,195,857     $ 84,624,695  
Cash and cash equivalents
    36,755             36,755  
Restricted cash
          226,284       226,284  
Other assets
    933,895       302,464       1,236,359  
                   
 
Total assets acquired
  $ 51,399,488     $ 34,724,605     $ 86,124,093  
                   
Indebtedness
  $     $ 6,418,634       6,418,634  
Other liabilities
    1,070,266       11,258       1,081,524  
                   
 
Total liabilities assumed
    1,070,266       6,429,892       7,500,158  
Cash paid, including closing costs
    50,329,222       28,294,713       78,623,935  
                   
 
Total cash paid and liabilities assumed
  $ 51,399,488     $ 34,724,605     $ 86,124,093  
                   
      The following unaudited pro forma statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 are based on the historical consolidated and combined financial statements of the Company and/or its Predecessor and adjusted to give effect to a) the completion of the Company’s formation transactions and its initial public offering on August 29, 2003, b) the acquisition of FelCor on October 8, 2003, c) the acquisition of Noble on November 24, 2003, d) the acquisitions of Marriott Residence Inn, Sea Turtle Inn, SpringHill Suites, and Sheraton Bucks County, which closed on March 24, 2004, April 2, 2004, May 17, 2004, and July 7, 2004, respectively, e) the acquisition of Day on July 23, 2004, f) the acquisition of Dunn on September 2, 2004, and the related interest expense associated with the $210.0 million term loan, net of debt reductions, which also closed September 2, 2004, g) the acquisition of Hyatt Orange County on October 1, 2004, h) additional interest expense associated with the $6.4 million mortgage note payable assumed on November 24, 2003, the $27.8 million mortgage note payable executed on December 24, 2003, the $60.0 million credit facility executed on February 5, 2004, the $15.7 million mortgage note payable assumed on April 1, 2004, the $6.8 million mortgage note payable assumed on May 17, 2004, the $9.7 million mortgage note payable executed on July 7, 2004, the $19.6 million mortgage note payable executed on July 23, 2004, and the $15.0 million credit facility draw executed on October 1, 2004, and i) the issuance of Series A

93


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
preferred stock on September 22, 2004, and the related dividends associated with such preferred stock, as if these transactions occurred at the beginning of the periods presented.
                     
        The
        Company &
    The Company   Predecessor
         
    Year Ended   Year Ended
    December 31,   December 31,
    2004   2003
         
    (Unaudited)   (Unaudited)
Total revenues
  $ 166,171,798     $ 152,530,803  
Operating expenses
    144,254,147       140,633,141  
             
 
   
Operating income
    21,917,651       11,897,662  
Interest income
    335,495       289,133  
 
Interest expense and amortization of loan costs
    (17,944,973 )     (13,871,090 )
Write-off of loan costs
    (1,633,369 )      
             
 
Income (loss) before minority interest and benefit from income taxes
    2,674,804       (1,684,295 )
 
Benefit from income taxes
    3,221,706        
Minority interest
    (1,126,823 )     321,869  
             
 
 
Net income (loss)
    4,769,687       (1,362,426 )
 
Preferred dividends
    (4,916,250 )     (4,916,250 )
             
 
Net loss available to common shareholders
  $ (146,563 )   $ (6,278,676 )
             
 
Net loss per share available to common shareholders:
               
 
Basic and Diluted
  $ (0.01 )   $ (0.25 )
             
 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
               
 
Basic and Diluted
    25,293,969       25,293,969  
             

94


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
20. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
      Selected quarterly financial data for the Company and/or its Predecessor for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 is below:
                                           
    First   Second   Third   Fourth    
    Quarter   Quarter   Quarter   Quarter   Total
                     
Total revenue
                                       
 
2004
  $ 19,311,622     $ 25,833,777     $ 31,336,422     $ 40,443,241     $ 116,925,062  
                               
 
2003
  $ 8,532,756     $ 9,325,645     $ 9,550,555     $ 14,869,645     $ 42,278,601  
                               
Total operating expenses
                                       
 
2004
  $ 17,864,774     $ 21,746,609     $ 27,457,738     $ 35,081,758     $ 102,150,879  
                               
 
2003
  $ 7,854,209     $ 8,401,970     $ 9,264,492     $ 16,182,823     $ 41,703,494  
                               
Operating income (loss)
                                       
 
2004
  $ 1,446,848     $ 4,087,168     $ 3,878,684     $ 5,361,483     $ 14,774,183  
                               
 
2003
  $ 678,547     $ 923,675     $ 286,063     $ (1,313,178 )   $ 575,107  
                               
Net income (loss)
                                       
 
2004
  $ 554,378     $ 1,694,188     $ (1,390,527 )   $ 561,168     $ 1,419,207  
                               
 
2003
  $ (816,253 )   $ (580,542 )   $ (1,194,245 )   $ (1,329,161 )   $ (3,920,201 )
                               
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
                                       
 
2004
  $ 554,378     $ 1,694,188     $ (1,390,527 )   $ (794,082 )   $ 63,957  
                               
 
2003
  $ (816,253 )   $ (580,542 )   $ (1,194,245 )   $ (1,329,161 )   $ (3,920,201 )
                               
2004 net income (loss) per share available to common shareholders
                                       
 
Basic and Diluted
  $ 0.02     $ 0.07     $ (0.06 )   $ (0.03 )   $  
                               
2003 net loss per share applicable to common shareholders — basic and diluted:
                                       
 
For the period from inception through September 30, 2003
                          $ (0.01 )        
                               
 
For the quarter ended December 31, 2003
                          $ (0.05 )        
                               
21. Subsequent Events (unaudited)
      On July 7, 2004, the Company acquired a hotel property and adjacent office building in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from Household OPEB I, Inc. for approximately $16.7 million in cash. At the time of the acquisition, the Company planned to sell the office building, which had one tenant and nominal operations. The Company allocated approximately $2.9 million of the purchase price to the office building. On January 19, 2005, the Company sold the office building for approximately $2.9 million, which is net of nominal closing costs.
      On January 20, 2005, in a follow-on public offering, the Company issued 10,350,000 shares of its common stock at $9.62 per share, which generated gross proceeds of approximately $99.6 million. However, the

95


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
aggregate proceeds to the Company, net of underwriters’ discount and offering costs, was approximately $94.3 million. The 10,350,000 shares issued include 1,350,000 shares sold pursuant to an over-allotment option granted to the underwriters. Of the net proceeds, a portion was used to partially fund the $35.0 million cash portion of the purchase price associated with the acquisition of twenty-one hotel properties, which was closed on March 16, 2005. The net proceeds were also used for the repayment of approximately $14.7 million of the mortgage debt assumed in the acquisition, repayment of the outstanding $17.8 million balance on the $60.0 million credit facility, due August 17, 2007, repayment of the $15.5 million mortgage note payable, due December 31, 2005, repayment of the $7.0 mortgage note payable, due July 31, 2007, and general corporate purposes.
      Pursuant to the Company’s Series B Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement and subsequent amendment, a financial institution has certain participation rights with respect to any sale of equity securities by the Company. Based on these participation rights and the follow-on offering discussed above, the financial institution has the option to purchase up to 2,070,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for $9.139 per share, the issuance of which would occur on November 1, 2005. If the financial institution has not exercised its option, the Company, at its option, may cause the financial institution to purchase the 2,070,000 shares for $9.139 per share on November 1, 2005, or on an earlier date provided the Company has sold all of the Series B preferred stock to the financial institution in accordance with the terms of the purchase agreement.
      On January 30, 2005, the Company’s Sheraton hotel in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, experienced a fire that resulted in extensive water damage to several of its floors. The entire hotel was subsequently closed for two weeks, and approximately half of the hotel remains temporarily closed. Although the Company’s insurance covers both physical damage and business-interruption losses, the Company is still assessing the impact of this fire. The Company currently estimates its property damage and business-interruption losses at approximately $1.0 million and $250,000, respectively. The Company’s insurance deductible related to this incident is $25,000.
      On February 8, 2005, the Company originated a mezzanine loan receivable of approximately $8.0 million, with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 9.13%, maturing February 2007 with three one-year extension options, with interest-only payments through maturity, prepayment prohibited through September 2006, and a prepayment penalty imposed between September 2006 and maturity.
      On March 9, 2005, the Company announced it will be acquiring the Hilton Santa Fe hotel in Santa Fe, New Mexico, from Santa Fe Hotel Joint Venture for approximately $18.2 million in cash. In addition, the Company plans an additional $2.5 million for future capital improvements. The purchase price was the result of an arms’ length negotiation. Annualized revenues of this hotel property are approximately $7.7 million. The Company plans to utilize cash from borrowings or cash from its follow-on public offering to fund this acquisition. The acquisition is expected to close in late March 2005.
      On March 9, 2005, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.16 per diluted share for common shareholders and units of limited partnership of record on March 31, 2005, payable April 15, 2005.
      On March 15, 2005, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.53 per diluted share for Series A preferred shareholders of record on March 31, 2005, payable April 15, 2005.
      On March 16, 2005, the Company acquired twenty-one hotel properties from selling entities controlled by affiliates of Fisher Brothers, Gordon Getty Trust, and George Soros, which collectively owned approximately 78% of the acquired hotels, and certain members of the Company’s senior management, which collectively owned approximately 22% of the acquired hotels, for approximately $250.0 million plus certain closing costs. The selling entities are collectively referred to as FGSB. The $250 million purchase price consisted of approximately $35.0 million in cash, approximately $164.7 million in assumed mortgage debt, and approximately $50.3 million worth of limited partnership units, which equates to 4,994,150 units based on the average

96


Table of Contents

ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. AND PREDECESSOR
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
market price of the Company’s common stock for the 20-day period ending five business days before signing a definitive agreement to acquire these properties on December 23, 2004. Company management received their net consideration for the acquisition in the form of limited partnership units, whereas the third parties received 50% of their consideration in limited partnership units and 50% in cash. Annualized revenues of these twenty-one hotel properties are approximately $114.9 million. When the Company entered into the agreement to acquire these 21 properties, it began assessing various strategic alternatives related to eight of the relatively smaller hotel properties, including possible sales of these properties. Since that time, the Company has secured contracts for the sale of two of the properties and letters of intent related to the sale of the other six properties. The Company used proceeds from its sale of Series B cumulative convertible redeemable preferred stock, from its follow-on public offering, and from a $15.0 million draw on its $60.0 million credit facility on March 16, 2005 to fund the acquisition of these properties. Regarding this acquisition, the Company’s Board of Directors formed a Special Committee solely comprised of independent directors to evaluate this transaction. The Special Committee retained independent advisors and to review, evaluate, and negotiate the transaction, which the Special Committee unanimously approved. The Special Committee will be paid $195,000 related to their services.

97


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2004
                                                   
COLUMN A   COLUMN B   COLUMN C   COLUMN D
             
            Costs Capitalized Since
        Initial Cost   Acquisition
             
            FF&E,       FF&E,
            Buildings and       Buildings and
Hotel Property   Location   Encumbrances   Land   Improvements   Land   Improvements
                         
Embassy Suites
    Austin, TX     $ 8,694,000     $ 1,200,000     $ 11,530,843       200,966       2,234,801  
Embassy Suites
    Dallas, TX       8,403,000       1,871,445       10,960,080       244,145       1,980,351  
Embassy Suites
    Herndon, VA       17,400,000       1,298,023       11,774,941       281,556       2,833,067  
Embassy Suites
    Las Vegas, NV       23,000,000       3,299,935       20,055,302       403,814       2,811,277  
Embassy Suites
    Phoenix, AZ       12,000,000       1,790,609       13,206,621             2,236,256  
Embassy Suites
    Syracuse, NY       12,225,000       2,839,268       10,958,507             2,797,661  
Embassy Suites
    Flagstaff, AZ       5,402,000       1,267,216       4,872,590             959,813  
Radisson Hotel
    Covington, KY             2,095,200       10,019,994       1,686       1,054,562  
Radisson Hotel
    Holtsville, NY       6,987,000       5,744,752       17,013,635       12,774       2,742,104  
Doubletree Guest Suites
    Columbus, OH       4,773,000             9,662,645             925,600  
Doubletree Guest Suites
    Dayton, OH       2,782,000       968,278       4,869,570             1,036,168  
Hilton Garden Inn
    Jacksonville, FL       6,296,373       1,750,671       9,920,469             172,953  
Homewood Suites
    Mobile, AL       6,675,000       1,333,977       7,559,205             334,110  
Hampton Inn
    Lawrenceville, GA       2,764,045       697,198       3,950,791             267,147  
Hampton Inn
    Evansville, IN       5,175,000       815,291       6,079,731             462,543  
Hampton Inn
    Terre Haute, IN       6,525,000       279,412       8,160,484             144,292  
Hampton Inn
    Horse Cave, KY       1,650,000       152,059       2,232,131             116,297  
Hampton Inn
    Buford, GA       5,250,000       1,142,307       5,379,612              
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
    Jacksonville, FL       6,734,000       1,347,532       7,636,014             162,685  
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
    Baltimore, MD       11,839,025       2,501,627       13,665,981             32,996  
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
    Kennesaw, GA       3,853,853       1,129,103       5,312,142             45,015  
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
    Buford, GA       5,325,000       1,122,224       6,422,506             16,715  
Fairfield Inn & Suites
    Kennesaw, GA       3,101,147       818,903       4,375,495              
Fairfield Inn by Marriott
    Evansville, IN       3,300,000       681,296       3,532,076             71,535  
Fairfield Inn by Marriott
    Princeton, IN       1,050,000       62,351       1,148,482             30,475  
Courtyard by Marriott
    Bloomington, IN       9,225,000       409,916       11,521,021             134,161  
Courtyard by Marriott
    Columbus, IN       4,875,000       898,132       4,934,204             24,924  
Courtyard by Marriott
    Louisville, KY       11,850,000       1,113,974       13,694,019       42       15,026  
Marriott Residence Inn
    Lake Buena Vista, FL       18,425,000       2,554,913       22,886,984             137,060  
Marriott Residence Inn
    Evansville, IN       5,175,000       553,519       6,687,099             58,240  
Sea Turtle
    Altantic Beach, FL       15,498,080       5,814,819       17,440,245             192,903  
Sheraton Bucks County
    Langhorne, PA       17,100,000       2,033,180       12,599,966             1,304,230  
Hyatt Regency Orange County
    Anaheim, CA       15,000,000       16,318,943       65,275,770             75,686  
                                     
 
Totals
          $ 268,352,523     $ 65,906,073     $ 365,339,155     $ 1,144,983     $ 25,410,650  
                                     

98


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
                                                                   
        COLUMN E   COLUMN F   COLUMN G   COLUMN H   COLUMN I
                         
        Gross Carrying Amount at Close of Period                
                        Depreciable Life
            FF&E, Buildings       Accumulated   Construction   Acquisition   in Latest
Hotel Property   Location   Land   and Improvements   Total   Depreciation   Date   Date   Income Statement
                                 
Embassy Suites
    Austin, TX     $ 1,400,966     $ 13,765,644     $ 15,166,610     $ 3,882,830       August 1998               (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Embassy Suites
    Dallas, TX       2,115,590       12,940,431       15,056,021       4,102,768       December  1998               (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Embassy Suites
    Herndon, VA       1,579,579       14,608,008       16,187,587       3,907,604       December  1998               (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Embassy Suites
    Las Vegas, NV       3,703,749       22,866,579       26,570,328       6,109,663       May 1999               (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Embassy Suites
    Phoenix, AZ       1,790,609       15,442,877       17,233,486       766,559               October 2003       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Embassy Suites
    Syracuse, NY       2,839,268       13,756,168       16,595,436       780,433               October 2003       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Embassy Suites
    Flagstaff, AZ       1,267,216       5,832,403       7,099,619       325,700               October 2003       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Radisson Hotel
    Covington, KY       2,096,886       11,074,556       13,171,442       2,345,428               November 2000       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Radisson Hotel
    Holtsville, NY       5,757,526       19,755,739       25,513,265       3,278,515               January 2001       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Doubletree Guest Suites
    Columbus, OH             10,588,245       10,588,245       577,969               October 2003       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Doubletree Guest Suites
    Dayton, OH       968,278       5,905,738       6,874,016       327,941               October 2003       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Hilton Garden Inn
    Jacksonville, FL       1,750,671       10,093,422       11,844,093       444,431               November 2003       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Homewood Suites
    Mobile, AL       1,333,977       7,893,315       9,227,292       296,148               November 2003       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Hampton Inn
    Lawrenceville, GA       697,198       4,217,938       4,915,136       160,706               November 2003       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Hampton Inn
    Evansville, IN       815,291       6,542,274       7,357,565       84,750               September  2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Hampton Inn
    Terre Haute, IN       279,412       8,304,776       8,584,187       110,440               September  2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Hampton Inn
    Horse Cave, KY       152,059       2,348,428       2,500,487       37,866               September  2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Hampton Inn
    Buford, GA       1,142,307       5,379,612       6,521,919       72,540               July 2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
    Jacksonville, FL       1,347,532       7,798,699       9,146,231       328,313               November 2003       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
    Baltimore, MD       2,501,627       13,698,976       16,200,603       272,520               May 2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
    Kennesaw, GA       1,129,103       5,357,157       6,486,260       80,482               July 2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
SpringHill Suites by Marriott
    Buford, GA       1,122,224       6,439,220       7,561,444       101,574               July 2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Fairfield Inn & Suites
    Kennesaw, GA       818,903       4,375,495       5,194,398       55,870               July 2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Fairfield Inn by Marriott
    Evansville, IN       681,296       3,603,611       4,284,908       40,152               September  2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Fairfield Inn by Marriott
    Princeton, IN       62,351       1,178,957       1,241,308       19,984               September  2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Courtyard by Marriott
    Bloomington, IN       409,916       11,655,182       12,065,098       115,826               September  2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Courtyard by Marriott
    Columbus, IN       898,132       4,959,128       5,857,260       63,166               September  2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Courtyard by Marriott
    Louisville, KY       1,114,015       13,709,045       14,823,060       221,689               September  2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Marriott Residence Inn
    Lake Buena Vista, FL       2,554,913       23,024,044       25,578,957       797,792               March 2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Marriott Residence Inn
    Evansville, IN       553,519       6,745,339       7,298,857       79,826               September  2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Sea Turtle
    Altantic Beach, FL       5,814,819       17,633,148       23,447,967       685,919               April 2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Sheraton Bucks County
    Langhorne, PA       2,033,180       13,904,196       15,937,376       182,861               July 2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)  
Hyatt Regency Orange County
    Anaheim, CA       16,318,943       65,351,456       81,670,399       683,471               October 2004       (1),(2),(3),(4)   
                                                 
 
Totals
          $ 67,051,056     $ 390,749,805     $ 457,800,861     $ 31,341,735                          
                                                 
 
(1)  Estimated useful life for buildings is 39 years.
 
(2)  Estimated useful life for building improvements is 15 years.
 
(3)  Estimated useful life for furniture and fixtures is 5 years.
 
(4)  Estimated useful life for computer hardware and software is 3 years.

99


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE III — REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION — (Continued)
                           
    Year Ended December 31,
     
    2004   2003   2002
             
    (The Company)   (Company &   (The Predecessor)
        Predecessor)    
Investment in Real Estate:
                       
 
Beginning Balance
  $ 194,421,063     $ 101,137,138     $ 100,057,314  
 
Additions(a)
    263,379,798       93,283,925       1,079,824  
 
Disposals
                 
                   
 
Ending Balance
  $ 457,800,861     $ 194,421,063     $ 101,137,138  
                   
Accumulated Depreciation:
                       
 
Beginning Balance
  $ 20,741,036     $ 15,890,337     $ 11,183,236  
 
Depreciation expense
    10,600,699       4,850,699       4,707,101  
 
Disposals
                 
                   
 
Ending Balance
  $ 31,341,735     $ 20,741,036     $ 15,890,337  
                   
Investment in Real Estate, net
  $ 426,459,126     $ 173,680,027     $ 85,246,801  
                   
 
(a)  In 2003, additions include a minority interest partial step-up of approximately $8.1 million to the historical net carrying values of four hotel properties as a result of the Company acquiring minority interest from unaffiliated parties.

100 EX-10.22 2 d23137exv10w22.txt PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT Exhibit 10.22 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS between ATRIUM PLAZA, LLC. as Seller and ASHFORD HOSPITALITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP as Purchaser Hyatt Regency Orange County TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE PAGE - ------- ---- I. DEFINITIONS........................................................... 1 II. SALE AND PURCHASE OF PROPERTY........................................ 6 2.1 Purchase of Property.......................................... 6 2.2 Purchase Price and Terms of Payment........................... 6 2.2.1 Earnest Money Deposit................................ 6 2.2.2 Balance of Purchase Price............................ 7 2.3 Assumption of the Contracts and the Tenant Leases............. 7 2.4 Assumption of the Management Agreement........................ 7 III. ESCROW.............................................................. 8 3.1 Opening of Escrow............................................. 8 3.2 Escrow Holder's General Provisions............................ 8 3.3 Additional Escrow Holder Requirements......................... 8 3.4 Deposit of Funds.............................................. 8 3.5 Release of Funds by Escrow Holder............................. 8 IV. CONDITION OF TITLE................................................... 9 4.1 Title Commitment.............................................. 9 4.2 Title Insurance Policy........................................ 9 4.3 Inspection.................................................... 10 4.4 Notice of Non-Satisfaction.................................... 13 4.5 Condition of the Property..................................... 13 V. CLOSING............................................................... 18 5.1 Closing Date.................................................. 18 5.2 Action Prior to the Close of Escrow by Seller................. 18 5.3 Action Prior to the Close of Escrow by Purchaser.............. 19 5.4 Recording of Grant Deed....................................... 20 5.5 Prorations.................................................... 20 5.5.1 Taxes................................................ 20 5.5.2 Advance Reservations................................. 20 5.5.3 Utility Service...................................... 20 5.5.4 Revenue From Operations.............................. 21 5.5.5 Accounts Payable and Operating Expenses.............. 21 5.5.6 Miscellaneous Permits and Taxes...................... 21 5.5.7 Contracts and Tenant Leases.......................... 21 5.5.8 Other Income......................................... 21
i 5.5.9 Other Expenses....................................... 22 5.5.10 House Banks.......................................... 22 5.5.11 Delayed Adjustments.................................. 22 5.5.12 Proration Allocation................................. 22 5.5.13 Survival............................................. 22 5.6 Guest Property................................................ 22 5.6.1 Safe Deposit Boxes................................... 22 5.6.2 Baggage Inventory.................................... 23 5.7 Closing Costs................................................. 23 5.8 Distribution of Funds and Documents Following Close of Escrow..................................................... 23 5.9 Possession.................................................... 25 VI. ADDITIONAL COVENANTS AND INDEMNITIES................................. 25 6.1 Seller's Accounts Receivable.................................. 25 6.2 Seller's Covenants............................................ 25 6.2.1 Renovation........................................... 25 6.2.2 Operation of the Hotel............................... 26 6.2.3 Indemnification for Taxes............................ 26 6.3 No Obligations of Escrow Holder............................... 26 VII. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES...................................... 27 7.1 By Purchaser.................................................. 27 7.1.1 Organization and Standing............................ 27 7.1.2 Due Authorization.................................... 27 7.1.3 Lack of Conflict..................................... 27 7.1.4 Solvency/Bankruptcy.................................. 27 7.2 By Seller..................................................... 27 7.2.1 Organization and Standing............................ 27 7.2.2 Due Authorization.................................... 28 7.2.3 Lack of Conflict..................................... 28 7.2.4 Non-Foreign Seller................................... 28 7.2.5 Solvency/Bankruptcy.................................. 28 7.2.6 Litigation........................................... 28 7.2.7 Accuracy of Materials................................ 28 7.2.8 Licenses and Permits................................. 29 7.2.9 Compliance with Laws................................. 29 7.2.10 Financial Statements................................. 29 7.2.11 Title to Real Property............................... 29 7.2.12 Personal Property and Inventory...................... 29 7.2.13 Labor and Employment Matters......................... 29 7.2.14 Utilities............................................ 29 7.2.15 No Commitments....................................... 29
ii VIII. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO CLOSE OF ESCROW............................ 30 8.1 Conditions to Seller's Obligations............................ 30 8.2 Conditions to Purchaser's Obligations......................... 31 8.3 Failure of Conditions to Close of Escrow...................... 31 IX. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES................................................... 31 9.1 Default by Purchaser.......................................... 31 9.2 Default by Seller............................................. 32 X. BROKERS............................................................... 33 XI. NOTICES.............................................................. 33 XII. MISCELLANEOUS....................................................... 35 12.1 Governing Law................................................. 35 12.2 Professional Fees and Costs................................... 35 12.3 Exhibits and Schedules a Part of This Agreement............... 35 12.4 Executed Counterparts......................................... 35 12.5 Assignment.................................................... 35 12.6 IRS - Form 1099-S............................................. 36 12.7 Successors and Assigns........................................ 36 12.8 Time is of the Essence........................................ 36 12.9 Entire Agreement.............................................. 36 12.10 Further Assurances............................................ 36 12.11 Waiver........................................................ 36 12.12 Headings...................................................... 36 12.13 Risk of Loss.................................................. 37 12.14 Construction of Agreement..................................... 38 12.15 Tax Deferred Exchange......................................... 38 12.16 No Public Disclosure.......................................... 40 12.17 Covenants, Representations and Warranties..................... 40 12.18 Confidentiality............................................... 40 12.19 Limitation on Liability....................................... 41 12.20 No Third-Party Beneficiaries.................................. 41 XIII. EXECUTION.......................................................... 43
iii PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS This PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS (the "Agreement") is dated the 28th day of July, 2004, and is made by and between ATRIUM PLAZA, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Seller"), and ASHFORD HOSPITALITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited partnership ("Purchaser"). RECITALS A. Seller is the owner of certain real property located in the County of Orange, State of California, more specifically located at 100 Alicante Plaza, Garden Grove, California on which are constructed certain improvements in, by, and through which is operated a hotel and hospitality business under the name "Hyatt Regency Orange County" B. Subject to the terms and conditions hereof, Seller desires to sell, assign, transfer, convey and deliver to Purchaser, and Purchaser desires to acquire from Seller, all of Seller's right, title and interest in the Property (as defined hereinbelow), together with all rights, benefits, privileges and appurtenances pertaining thereto, for such consideration as is hereinafter set forth. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, including the promises, covenants, representations and warranties hereinafter set forth, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally and equitably bound, agree as follows. I. DEFINITIONS As used in this Agreement, the following terms have the meanings ascribed to them in this Article I: "Alcoholic Beverages." All unopened wine, beer and other alcoholic beverages located at the Real Property and held for consumption and/or sale in the operation of the Hotel. "Assignment of Contracts." As set forth in Section 5.2(d) hereof. "Assignment of Intangibles." As set forth in Section 5.2(c) hereof. "Assignment of Tenant Leases" As set forth in Section 5.2(e) hereof. "Bill of Sale." As set forth in Section 5.2(b) hereof. 1 "Bookings." All contracts or reservations for the use or occupancy of guest rooms, meeting rooms and/or banquet facilities of the Hotel which are in Seller's ordinary course of business for the Hotel. "Casualty." As set forth in Section 12.13(a) hereof. "Casualty Notice." As set forth in Section 12.13(a) hereof. "Casualty Renovation Cost." As set forth in Section 12.13(a) hereof. "Close of Escrow." As set forth in Section 5.1 hereof. "Closing Date." As set forth in Section 5.1 hereof. "Contracts." All contracts and agreements, including the Management Agreement and the Tenant Leases, used and/or executed in connection with the ownership and/or operation of the Hotel and/or the Property, including, without limitation, (a) all (i) maintenance, supply and service contracts, (ii) operating leases which are not capitalized (for example, postage machines, photocopiers, and similar items of furniture, fixtures and equipment), and (iii) equipment leases, all as described on Schedule "A" attached hereto, (b) all contracts, agreements and other obligations terminable on not more than thirty (30) days prior notice without penalty, and (c) all other contracts and agreements (including the Bookings) entered into by Seller within the ordinary course of business after the date hereof as permitted, and disclosed to Purchaser as required, by the terms of this Agreement. "Cooperating Party." As set forth in Section 12.15 hereof. "Cut-Off Time." As set forth in Section 5.5.4 hereof. "Due Diligence Materials." As set forth in Section 4.3 hereof. "Earnest Money Deposit." As set forth in Section 2.2.1 hereof. "Environmental Damages." As set forth in Section 4.5(g) hereof. "Environmental Requirements." As set forth in Section 4.5(h) hereof. "Escrow." As set forth in Section 3.1 her eof. "Escrow Holder." The Heritage Escrow Company, Attn: Janet Tilbury, 18377 Beach Blvd., Suite 210, Huntington Beach, CA 92648, Telephone (714) 861-4065, Telecopier (714) 861-4075, E-mail jtilbury@heritageescrow.com. "Exchangor." As set forth in Section 12.15 hereof. 2 "Excluded Assets." Those assets are described on Schedule "B" attached hereto. "Excluded Documents." All (a) Proprietary Information, (b) internal memoranda, correspondence, analyses, documents or reports prepared by or for Seller or any affiliate of Seller in connection with this Agreement or otherwise, including, without limitation, tax returns or financial statements of Seller (exclusive of operating statements and budgets of the Hotel which shall be available for review by Purchaser) for or in connection with its ownership or operation of the Property that is not a part of the Due Diligence Materials, (c) communications between Seller or any affiliate and its attorneys or other agents or representatives, (d) employee personnel files of Seller and the manager of the Hotel unless the employee consents to the release or disclosure thereof, (e) appraisals, assessments or other valuations of the Property in the possession of Seller that is not a part of the Due Diligence Materials, (f) original bills, invoices, receipts and checks relating to expenses incurred prior to the Cut-Off Time (provided that Purchaser shall be entitled to copies of such items), and (g) any confidential or proprietary information of Hyatt Corporation in Seller's possession that is not a part of the Due Diligence Materials. "Food Inventory." All unopened food, food stuffs, menu stock and non-alcoholic beverages located at the Real Property and held for consumption and/or sale in the operation of the Hotel. "Good Funds." A deposit of cash, cashier's check, certified funds, or confirmed wire transfer of funds. "Grant Deed." As set forth in Section 5.2(a) hereof. "Hazardous Materials." As set forth in Section 4.5(i) hereof. "Hotel." The hospitality business operated and conducted by Seller on the Real Property. "Hyatt Corporation." Hyatt Corporation, a Delaware corporation. "Improvements." The buildings, structures, and other permanent improvements located on the Land, including, without limitation, electrical distribution systems, HVAC systems, walkways, driveways, parking lots, recreational facilities, plumbing, swimming pool, lighting, and mechanical equipment and fixtures installed thereon, and all rights, benefits and privileges appurtenant thereto. "Inspection Period." As set forth in Section 4.3 hereof. "Intangible Property." All (a) fictitious business names and logos used by Seller in the operation of the Hotel and which are identified exclusively with the Hotel, but excluding the names " Hyatt," " Hyatt Regency," and all derivatives thereof, (b) local (Area Code 714) 3 telephone exchange numbers identified exclusively with the Hotel, (c) transferable licenses, permits and warranties now in effect with respect to the Property (excepting liquor licenses), (d) transferable certificates (including the Certificate of Occupancy for the Real Property), licenses, permits and warranties now in effect with respect to the Property (specifically excluding, however, the liquor licenses for the Hotel), and (e) all other intangible property located at the Real Property and used by Seller exclusively in connection with the ownership and operation of the Hotel(including all of its rights to any website domain names identified exclusively with the Hotel, and all transferable website information pertaining exclusively with the Hotel), but excluding the Excluded Assets, Excluded Documents, the Proprietary Computer Systems, and the Proprietary Information. "Intermediary." As set forth in Section 12.15 hereof. "Inventory." All unopened operating inventories, materials and supplies used in connection with the operation of the Hotel and located thereat, including linens, bath towels, paper goods, and guest supplies, the Alcoholic Beverages, and the Food Inventory. "Land." The land more particularly described on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and upon which the Improvements are located, including all easements, rights-of-way, strips, zones, licenses, transferable hereditaments, privileges, tenements and appurtenants belonging to the Real Property, and any right or interest in any open or proposed highways, streets, roads, avenues, alleys, easements, strips, gores and rights-of-way in, across, in front of, contiguous to, abutting or adjoining the Real Property, and other rights and benefits running with the Land and/or the owner of the Land. "Liabilities." As set forth in Section 12.15 hereof. "Management Agreement." That certain Management Agreement dated June 30, 2000 between Hyatt Corporation and Seller, for the management and operation of the Hotel by Hyatt Corporation. "Non-Foreign Affidavit." As set forth in Section 5.2(e) hereof. "Notices." As set forth in Article XI hereof. "Opening of Escrow." As set forth in Section 3.1 hereof. "Permitted Exceptions." As set forth in Section 4.2 hereof. "Personal Property." All (a) keys and combinations to all doors, cabinets, enclosures and other locks on or about the Real Property, (b) furniture, equipment, appliances, televisions, telephone systems, artwork, machinery, tools, trade fixtures and other personal property owned by Seller, located on the Real Property, and which are used exclusively in connection with the 4 operation of the Hotel and/or the Real Property, (c) copies of files, if any, maintained or generated by Seller in the course of Seller's operation of the Hotel (excluding the Excluded Documents and other materials proprietary to Seller) which are located on the Real Property or which were obtained from the prior owner of the Hotel and which is not the subject to any confidentiality obligation imposed on Seller by such prior owner, (d) the Restaurant Equipment, (e) the Reserve Fund, and (f) all other personal property located at the Real Property with respect to which Seller is the owner thereof and which is used by Seller exclusively in connection with the ownership and operation of the Hotel and/or the Real Property; but excluding, however, (i) cash, cash equivalents and Seller's Accounts Receivable, (ii) the personal property owned by any tenant or guest on the Real Property, (iii) all refunds and claims for refunds for real property and personal property taxes in connection with the Property for any period prior to the Close of Escrow, (iv) all tax and utilities and other deposits, (v) the Excluded Assets, and (vi) the Proprietary Information, the Proprietary Computer Systems and the Excluded Documents. "Property." The Land, the Improvements, the Hotel, the Personal Property, the Inventory, the Alcoholic Beverages, the Food Inventory, and the Intangible Property. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this Agreement, "Property" does not include the Proprietary Information, the Proprietary Computer Systems, the Excluded Assets, the Excluded Documents, cash, cash equivalents, checks and other funds, including, without limitation, till money, house banks, operating accounts for the Hotel, Seller's Accounts Receivable, compensation from the City of Garden Grove for the "taking" as referenced in Section hereof, and notes, securities and other evidence of indebtedness held at the Hotel as of the Cut-Off Time, nor does it include balances on deposit to the credit of Seller with banking institutions, and the same shall be retained by Seller on the Close of Escrow. "Proprietary Computer Systems." The computer software, hardware, programs, processes and procedures used in the operation of the Hotel by Hyatt Corporation under the Management Agreement. "Proprietary Information." As set forth in Section 12.18 hereof. "Purchase Price." As set forth in Section 2.2 hereof. "Real Property." The Land and the Improvements. "Renovation." As described on Exhibit "D" attached hereto. "Reports. As set forth in Section 4.5(d) hereof. "Reserve Fund." As defined in the Management Agreement. 5 "Restaurant Equipment." All equipment, furniture, fixtures, utensils, glassware, silverware and china used in connection with the operation of all restaurants and lounges on the Real Property. "Seller's Accounts Receivable." All accounts receivable and other sums owing Seller in connection with the operation of the Hotel existing on and prior to the Close of Escrow. "Survey." As set forth in Section 4.2 hereof. "Tenant Leases." Leases of space in or portions of the Improvements and/or the Real Property as described on Schedule "E" attached hereto. "Title Commitment." As set forth in Section 4.1 hereof. "Title Insurer." Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Attention: Janis Okerlund, 1300 Dove St., Suite 310, Newport Beach, CA 92660, Telephone: (949) 622-4508, Telecopier: (949) 477-3798, E-mail jokerlund@fnf.com. "Title Policy." As set forth in Section 4.2 hereof. II. SALE AND PURCHASE OF PROPERTY 2.1 Purchase of Property. As of the Close of Escrow, and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Seller shall sell, assign, convey, transfer and deliver to Purchaser, and Purchaser shall purchase and acquire from Seller, fee title in the Real Property, good and marketable title in the Personal Property and the Inventory, and all of Seller's right, title and interest in and to Contracts and the Intangible Property, free and clear of all monetary liens and encumbrances (other than the Contracts and the Permitted Exceptions), at the purchase price provided in Section 2.2 hereof. 2.2 Purchase Price and Terms of Payment. The purchase price for the Property ("Purchase Price") shall be Eighty-One Million Dollars ($81,000,000), plus an amount equal to the cost basis of the Alcoholic Beverages and the Food inventory, and shall consist of and be payable as follows: 2.2.1 Earnest Money Deposit. Within one (1) business day after the execution of this Agreement by Purchaser and Seller, Purchaser shall deliver to Escrow Holder, in Good Funds, the sum of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000), and thereafter within two (2) business days after the expiration of the Inspection Period (provided that Purchaser has not terminated this Agreement as provided in Section 4.4 below), Purchaser shall deliver to Escrow Holder, in Good Funds, the additional sum of Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($700,000) (for 6 a total of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) (collectively, together with all interest thereon, the "Earnest Money Deposit"). The Earnest Money Deposit shall be held by Escrow Holder in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The Earnest Money Deposit shall be non-refundable to Purchaser upon the expiration of the Inspection Period (unless prior thereto, Seller and Escrow Holder receive from Purchaser a Notice (in accordance with the requirements of Section 4.4 hereof) that Purchaser elects to terminate this Agreement and cancel the Escrow), except in the event of a (a) material uncured default by Seller of its obligations under this Agreement, (b) failure of a condition precedent to Purchaser's obligations as set forth in this Agreement, or (c) except as otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement. The Earnest Money Deposit shall be applied to the Purchase Price on the Close of Escrow. 2.2.2 Balance of Purchase Price. Not later than 11:00 a.m. California time on the Closing Date, Purchaser shall deposit with Escrow Holder, in Good Funds, the balance of the Purchase Price, reduced or increased by such amounts required to take into account such prorations, credits, costs or other adjustments which are required by this Agreement and which can be computed and determined as of the time for the required deposit hereunder. 2.3 Assumption of the Contracts and the Tenant Leases. As additional consideration, Purchaser shall, on and as of the Close of Escrow, at its sole cost and expense, assume and agree to pay all sums and perform, fulfill and comply with all other covenants and obligations which are to be paid, performed and complied with by Seller under the Contracts and the Tenant Leases which first arise on and after the Close of Escrow. Seller shall indemnify and hold Purchaser and its owners and affiliates harmless from all breaches, claims, liabilities, losses and damages arising under the Contracts and the Tenant Leases for all periods prior to the Close of Escrow. Purchaser shall indemnify and hold Seller and its owners and affiliates, harmless from all breaches, claims, liabilities, losses and damages arising under the Contracts and the Tenant Leases (including, without limitation, those arising from or as a result of the assignment and assumption thereof) for all periods on and after the Close of Escrow. The provisions of this Section 2.3 shall survive the Close of Escrow. 2.4 Assumption of the Management Agreement. Purchaser shall assume the Management Agreement (without fee, liability or penalty to Seller), at Purchaser's sole cost and expense, without any property improvement obligations imposed by Hyatt Corporation as a condition thereof, and in each case with the full release of Seller from liability thereunder for all periods after the Closing Date. Seller agrees to cooperate with Purchaser's efforts to apply for and obtain the assignment and assumption of the Management Agreement all at no cost or expense to Seller. Purchaser shall use commercially diligent reasonable efforts to submit to Hyatt Corporation its application for the assignment and assumption of the Management Agreement as soon as practicable following execution of this Agreement (subject to any statutory UFOC waiting periods), and shall diligently pursue the processing thereof. 7 III. ESCROW 3.1 Opening of Escrow. The parties shall open an escrow (the "Escrow") with Escrow Holder by depositing with Escrow Holder the Earnest Money Deposit and three (3) copies of this Agreement duly executed (in counterparts or otherwise) by Seller and Purchaser. The time when Escrow Holder receives the Earnest Money Deposit and executes the copies of this Agreement shall be deemed the "Opening of Escrow." Purchaser and Seller shall execute and deliver to Escrow Holder, in a timely fashion, such instruments and funds as are reasonably necessary to close the Escrow and consummate the sale and purchase of the Property (or the exchange thereof, if applicable) in accordance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 3.2 Escrow Holder's General Provisions. Escrow Holder's standard escrow "General Provisions" are attached hereto as Exhibit "F." In the event of any conflict between the provisions of the typed portion of this Agreement and the General Provisions, the provisions of the typed portion of this Agreement shall be controlling and the General Provisions will be deemed amended accordingly. 3.3 Additional Escrow Holder Requirements. If there are any requirements imposed by Escrow Holder relating to the duties or obligations of Escrow Holder, or if Escrow Holder requires any other additional instructions, the parties agree to make such deletions, substitutions and additions to this Agreement which do not cause more than a ministerial or de minimis change to this Agreement or its intent. Any such changes requested by Escrow Holder shall be subject to written approval of the parties, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or conditioned. 3.4 Deposit of Funds. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, all funds deposited into the Escrow by Purchaser shall be immediately deposited by Escrow Holder into Treasury Bills or other short-term United States Government obligations, in repurchase contracts for the same, or in a federally insured money market account, subject to the control of Escrow Holder in a bank or savings and loan association, or such other institution approved by Purchaser; provided, however, that such funds must be readily available as necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement and Escrow Holder's escrow instructions, and for the Escrow to close within the time specified in Section 5.1 of this Agreement. Except as may be otherwise specifically provided herein, interest on amounts placed by Escrow Holder in any such investments or interest bearing accounts shall accrue to the benefit of Purchaser, and Purchaser shall promptly provide to Escrow Holder Purchaser's Tax Identification Number. 3.5 Release of Funds by Escrow Holder. Escrow Holder's obligation under this Agreement to release the Earnest Money Deposit, and any other funds, prior to the Close of Escrow is subject to such funds having cleared through the bank, savings and loan, or other financial institution on which such funds are drawn. Escrow Holder shall make such payments 8 only in strict accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, and Purchaser and Seller agree to save and hold Escrow Holder harmless in disbursing and releasing the funds as specified in this Agreement. Purchaser and Seller represent to Escrow Holder that the release instructions set forth in this Agreement are made of their own free will, under no duress, and with full understanding of the consequences thereof, not relying on any information furnished or statements made by Escrow Holder. IV. CONDITION OF TITLE 4.1 Title Commitment. Within ten (10) days after the Opening of Escrow, Escrow Holder, at Seller's sole cost and expense, shall cause to be furnished to Purchaser a current commitment for a A.L.T.A. Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (standard coverage) issued by Title Insurer (the "Title Commitment") reflecting the status of title to the Real Property and all exceptions, including easements, licenses, restrictions, rights-of-way, leases, covenants, reservations and other conditions, if any, affecting the Real Property, which would appear in a A.L.T.A. Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (standard coverage) if used, and committing to issue the A.L.T.A. Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (standard coverage) to Purchaser in the full amount of the Purchase Price. Accompanying the Title Commitment, Escrow Holder shall cause to be furnished to Purchaser, to the extent available, legible copies of the documents affecting the Real Property referred to in the Title Commitment. 4.2 Title Insurance Policy. Effective as of the Close of Escrow, but conditioned upon the Close of Escrow, Title Insurer shall issue to Purchaser Title Insurer's A.L.T.A. Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (standard coverage) (the "Title Policy"), with liability in the amount of the Purchase Price for the Real Property insuring fee title in the Real Property as vested in Purchaser subject only to the following matters affecting title ("Permitted Exceptions"). (a) All general and special property taxes and assessments not yet delinquent, and all improvement and assessment bonds; (b) Supplemental taxes assessed as a result of the sale of the Real Property by Seller to Purchaser; (c) All liens, covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, rights of way, and all other exceptions to title as referenced in the Title Commitment, except monetary liens and encumbrances (other than caused by Purchaser) which Seller shall remove at or prior to the Close of Escrow; (d) All exceptions to title disclosed by or in, or arising from or in connection with, the Survey (and any updates thereto) of the Real Property for the Title Policy (including, without limitation, easements, encroachments and zoning); 9 (e) The Tenant Leases, and the rights of the tenants thereunder; (f) All security interests recorded in connection with the Contracts; (g) Rights of parties in possession not shown by the public records, easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records, but with respect to which Purchaser has knowledge thereof; (h) Governmental laws, codes, ordinances and restrictions now or hereafter in effect so far as these affect the Property or any part thereof, including, without limitation, zoning ordinances (and amendments and additions relating thereto) and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, and any and all other matters, known or unknown, relating to the Property, or its condition, use, value or operation; (i) Any exceptions created by Purchaser or its agents, employees and/or contractors, including without limitation, any exceptions arising by reason of the entry on the Real Property by Purchaser or by its agents, employees and/or contractors; and (j) All preprinted exceptions and exclusions contained in the Title Policy, except those customarily deleted by an owner's affidavit. At Purchaser's election, the Title Policy shall be an A.L.T.A. Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (extended coverage); provided, however, that Purchaser's ability to obtain an A.L.T.A. Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (extended coverage) shall not be a condition precedent to Purchaser's obligations hereunder and shall not extend the Closing Date or delay the Close of Escrow. In addition, Purchaser shall have the right to obtain from Title Insurer such endorsements to the Title Policy and/or such additional liability protection as Purchaser may elect to obtain; provided, however, that Purchaser's ability to obtain such title endorsements and/or such additional liability protection shall not be a condition precedent to Purchaser's obligations hereunder and shall not extend or delay the Close of Escrow. Purchaser shall be solely responsible for negotiating with Title Insurer with respect to such A.L.T.A. Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (extended coverage) and/or with respect to such title endorsements and/or such additional liability protection as may be requested by Purchaser, if any. Seller will deliver to Purchaser a copy of any survey of the Real Property in its possession, without warranty, and Purchaser shall be solely responsible for, and shall assume the risk of, obtaining a survey (or updating Seller's survey) of the Real Property (the "Survey") acceptable to Title Insurer for purposes of issuing the Title Policy. Seller will also deliver to Title Insurer an Owner's Affidavit in customary form in connection with the issuance of the Title Policy. 4.3 Inspection. Purchaser shall have the right, in its sole discretion, until 5:00 p.m. California time on August 27, 2004, or such earlier date as Purchaser shall elect in writing, to 10 satisfy itself, in its sole discretion, as to the condition and extent of the Property (the "Inspection Period"). Subject to the prior termination of this Agreement, during the Inspection Period Seller shall cooperate and provide Purchaser with reasonable and continuing access to the Real Property upon one (1) business day prior Notice to Seller for the purpose of Purchaser's inspection and due diligence review. In connection with such review, during normal business hours during the Inspection Period, Purchaser and its agents shall be afforded the opportunity to review reasonably available records, including non-proprietary financial reports (including the audited financial statements, general ledgers and such other financial information for the Hotel as reasonably requested by Purchaser and which is in Seller's possession (and which is not Proprietary Information) for the Hotel), the Tenant Leases, and the Contracts pertaining to the Hotel which are in or under Seller's control and relate to the operation of the Hotel, upon reasonable Notice, except that Seller shall have no obligation to deliver or make available to Purchaser, and Purchaser shall have no right to review, the Excluded Documents and the Proprietary Information. Neither Purchaser nor any of its employees, agents or representatives shall contact or otherwise discuss this transaction and /or the operation of the Hotel with any on-site employees of the Hotel. Purchaser acknowledges that prior to the date of this Agreement, Seller has delivered to Purchaser, or Seller will so provide Purchaser within three (3) business days after execution of this Agreement, the information, documents, agreements and reports relating to the operation of the Property by Seller, as identified on Schedule "G" attached hereto (collectively the "Due Diligence Materials"). Purchaser shall have until the expiration of the Inspection Period to review and approve the Due Diligence Materials. During the Inspection Period, Seller shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain from Hyatt Corporation, for the benefit of Purchaser, an estoppel certificate confirming that (a) to the best of the knowledge of Hyatt Corporation, there are no defaults under the Management Agreement, and (b) that the cost of the Renovation will not exceed Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000) (or if it does so exceed Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000), Purchaser will not be liable to pay for any portion of such excess). If Seller is unable to so obtain the estoppel certificate prior to the expiration of the Inspection Period, provided that Purchaser waives its right to terminate this Agreement under Section 4.4 hereof, then Seller will extend the Inspection Period for an additional ten (10) days solely for the purpose of obtaining the estoppel certificate and if Seller does not so obtain it, Purchaser may then terminate this Agreement prior to the expiration of such ten (10) day period. During the Inspection Period, Purchaser shall also have the opportunity to conduct a Phase I environmental audit/study of the Real Property, property condition report, zoning report and such other studies desired by Purchaser (subject to any consent rights of Seller as set forth herein). Any environmental audit/study proposed to be undertaken by Purchaser that involves subsurface testing or is otherwise invasive shall be subject to Seller's written approval prior to the commencement thereof not to be unreasonably withheld or conditioned. As a 11 condition to any such consent, Purchaser shall obtain and maintain such public liability insurance in an amount of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) affecting the Real Property, naming Seller as an additional insured. Purchaser, at all times, will conduct such due diligence in compliance with all applicable laws and the terms of any Tenant Leases, and in a manner so as to not cause damage, loss, cost or expense to Seller, the Property or the tenants or guests of the Property, and without unreasonably interfering with or disturbing any employee, tenant or guest at the Property. Purchaser shall not reveal to any governmental agency or any other third party (other than Purchaser's employees, agents, attorneys, lenders and advisors) not approved by Seller the results of or any other information acquired pursuant to its inspections unless required by applicable law. Purchaser will promptly restore any damage to the Property caused by Purchaser's inspection to its condition immediately preceding such inspections and examinations and will keep the Property free and clear of any mechanic's liens or materialmen's liens in connection with such inspections and examinations. The cost of the inspections and tests undertaken pursuant to this Section 4.3 shall be borne solely by Purchaser. Purchaser shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold Seller, Seller's lenders, Hyatt Corporation, and their affiliates, owners, agents and employees harmless from and against any obligation, liability, claim (including any claim for damage to property or injury to or death of any persons), lien or encumbrance, loss, damage, cost or expense, including reasonable attorneys' fees, whether or not legal proceedings are instituted, arising from the acts or omissions of Purchaser or its agents, employees or contractors occurring in connection with, or as a result of, such inspections, tests or examinations of the Property. Purchaser covenants and agrees that all such information and materials (including the Due Diligence Materials) disclosed and/or delivered to it by Seller, or Seller's agents, employees and representatives, are confidential and proprietary information, and that Purchaser shall hold the same in strict confidence, and shall not disclose the same to anyone other than its employees and advisors on a "need-to-know" basis subject to the confidentiality restrictions set forth herein. Purchaser also agrees that, in the event the transactions contemplated in this Agreement are not consummated as provided herein, Purchaser shall return all such information and documentation, and all copies thereof, to Seller promptly upon Seller's request. Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, Seller makes no representations or warranties as to the truth, accuracy or completeness of the Due Diligence Materials or any materials, data or other information, if any, supplied to Purchaser in connection with Purchaser's inspection of the Property (e.g., that such materials are complete, accurate or the final version thereof, or that all such materials are in Seller's possession). It is the parties' express understanding and agreement that any such materials are to be provided only for Purchaser's convenience in making its own examination and determination prior to the expiration of the Inspection Period as to whether it wishes to purchase the Property, and, in doing so, Purchaser shall rely exclusively on its own independent investigation and evaluation of every aspect of the 12 Property and not on any materials supplied by Seller. Purchaser expressly disclaims any intent to rely on any such materials provided to it by Seller in connection with its inspection and agrees that it shall rely solely on its own independently developed or verified information. The obligations of Purchaser under this Section 4.3 (including its indemnification obligations) shall survive the Close of Escrow or the termination of this Agreement. 4.4 Notice of Non-Satisfaction. During the Inspection Period, Purchaser may in its sole and absolute discretion, for any reason or for no reason, terminate this Agreement and cancel the Escrow, in which case the Earnest Money Deposit shall be promptly refunded to Purchaser, and Purchaser shall return to Seller all materials (including the Due Diligence Materials) delivered to it pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.3 hereof, and neither Seller nor Purchaser shall have any further obligations under this Agreement (except as otherwise provided in this Agreement). If Purchaser fails to provide Notice of cancellation within the Inspection Period as provided for hereof, Purchaser shall be deemed to have approved the state of the Property and the condition of title, and shall be deemed to have waived its rights to terminate this Agreement and cancel the Escrow as a result thereof. 4.5 Condition of the Property. (a) PURCHASER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT SELLER IS NOT THE ORIGINAL OWNER OF THE LAND. PURCHASER FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT, PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE INSPECTION PERIOD, PURCHASER WILL HAVE THOROUGHLY INSPECTED AND EXAMINED, AND UNCONDITIONALLY AND IRREVOCABLY APPROVED (SUBJECT TO SELLER'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT), ALL ELEMENTS COMPRISING THE PROPERTY, AND ALL FACTORS RELATED TO THEIR USE AND OPERATION, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE CONTRACTS, THE TENANT LEASES, UTILITIES, PHYSICAL AND FUNCTIONAL ASPECTS OF THE PROPERTY, THE CONSTRUCTION AND CONDITION OF THE REAL PROPERTY, ALL MATTERS AFFECTING AND RELATING TO TITLE, AND MUNICIPAL AND OTHER LEGAL REQUIREMENTS SUCH AS TAXES, ASSESSMENTS AND BONDS, ZONING, USE PERMITS, BUSINESS PERMITS, LICENSES, AND SIMILAR ENTITLEMENTS. EXCEPT WITH RESPECT TO SELLER'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, PURCHASER HEREBY RELEASES AND FOREVER DISCHARGES SELLER FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, LOSSES, DAMAGES, LIABILITIES OR OBLIGATIONS ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO ALL OF THE ITEMS LISTED IN THIS SECTION, WHICH RELEASE AND DISCHARGE FROM LIABILITY SHALL SURVIVE THE CLOSE OF ESCROW, EXCEPT FOR SELLER'S FRAUD OR INTENTIONAL MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION. 13 PURCHASER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT PURCHASER'S FAILURE TO TERMINATE THIS AGREEMENT AND CANCEL THE ESCROW PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE INSPECTION PERIOD SHALL BE CONCLUSIVELY DEEMED PURCHASER'S AFFIRMATION THAT IT HAS COMPLETED ITS INVESTIGATIONS AND DUE DILIGENCE REVIEW OF THE PROPERTY AND HAS APPROVED THE CONDITION AND STATE THEREOF, SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT (b) PURCHASER FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT PURCHASER HAS SUBSTANTIAL EXPERIENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY, HOTELS AND HOTEL OPERATIONS, AND THAT PURCHASER WILL (SUBJECT TO SELLER'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT) ACQUIRE THE PROPERTY IN "AS IS, WHERE IS, WITH ALL FAULTS" CONDITION, AND SOLELY IN RELIANCE ON PURCHASER'S OWN INSPECTION AND EXAMINATION. PURCHASER WAIVES ANY OBLIGATION ON THE PART OF SELLER, OR ANY OTHER PERSON, TO DISCLOSE ANY DEFECTS OR OTHER DEFICIENCIES OR LIABILITIES IN OR WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY. (c) EXCEPT AS TO THOSE REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, IT IS EXPRESSLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT SELLER MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES OR GUARANTIES OF ANY KIND, NATURE OR SORT, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE PHYSICAL CONDITION, PAST, PRESENT OR FUTURE OPERATION AND/OR PERFORMANCE, OR VALUE, OF THE PROPERTY. SUBJECT TO SELLER'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, SELLER CONVEYS THE PROPERTY TO PURCHASER "AS IS AND WHERE IS, WITH ALL FAULTS," AND PURCHASER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT SELLER MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS, GUARANTIES OR WARRANTIES WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE QUALITY, CHARACTER, EXTENT, PERFORMANCE, CONDITION OR SUITABILITY OF THE PROPERTY FOR ANY PURPOSE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OR GUARANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. PURCHASER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT PURCHASER SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR ASCERTAINING THE TRANSFERABILITY OF ALL LICENSES, PERMITS AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL CONSENTS FOR THE OWNERSHIP, USE AND OPERATION OF THE PROPERTY, AND SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE TRANSFERS THEREOF. EXCEPT WITH RESPECT TO THE REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF SELLER EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, PURCHASER FURTHER WAIVES ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, GUARANTIES, CONDITIONS OR LIABILITIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARISING BY LAW OR 14 OTHERWISE (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY OBLIGATION OF SELLER WITH RESPECT TO CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES) AND ALL TORT LIABILITY, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, LIABILITY ARISING FROM NEGLIGENCE OR STRICT LIABILITY. PURCHASER ALSO ACKNOWLEDGES THAT SOME DEFECTS MAY BECOME APPARENT ONLY AFTER THE CLOSE OF ESCROW AND HEREBY RELEASES AND HOLDS SELLER HARMLESS FROM BLAME AND ALL LIABILITY FOR SUCH "LATENT DEFECTS." PURCHASER HEREBY COVENANTS NOT TO BRING ANY ACTION AGAINST SELLER BASED ON ANY OF THESE CLAIMS. THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE CLOSE OF ESCROW. (d) PURCHASER ALSO ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT, ALTHOUGH SELLER HAS PROVIDED TO PURCHASER CERTAIN REPORTS, STUDIES AND SURVEYS FOR OR REGARDING THE REAL PROPERTY (THE "REPORTS"), SELLER HAS NOT VERIFIED THE ACCURACY THEREOF AND MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES REGARDING THE MATTERS SET FORTH THEREIN, IT BEING THE RESPONSIBILITY OF PURCHASER TO VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF SUCH REPORTS. PURCHASER AGREES THAT SELLER HAS NO LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OR CONTENTS OF ANY SUCH REPORTS. PURCHASER HEREBY RELEASES AND FOREVER DISCHARGES SELLER FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, LOSSES, DAMAGES, LIABILITIES OR OBLIGATIONS ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO ALL OF THE ITEMS LISTED IN THIS PARAGRAPH, WHICH RELEASE AND DISCHARGE FROM LIABILITY SHALL SURVIVE THE CLOSE OF ESCROW, EXCEPT FOR SELLER'S FRAUD OR INTENTIONAL MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION. FURTHERMORE, EXCEPT AS TO THOSE REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, PURCHASER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT SELLER HAS NOT AND DOES NOT MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE INTEGRATION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS UPON OR WITHIN THE REAL PROPERTY. IN THAT REGARD, PURCHASER WILL, PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE INSPECTION PERIOD, AND PROVIDED SELLER GRANTS ITS CONSENT, CONDUCT ITS OWN INVESTIGATION AND OBTAIN ITS OWN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT TO DETERMINE IF THE REAL PROPERTY CONTAINS ANY HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC WASTE, MATERIALS, DISCHARGE, DUMPING OR CONTAMINATION, WHETHER SOIL, GROUNDWATER OR OTHERWISE, WHICH VIOLATES ANY FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL OR OTHER GOVERNMENTAL LAW, REGULATION OR ORDER OR REQUIRES REPORTING TO ANY GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY. (e) AS BETWEEN SELLER AND PURCHASER, SELLER SHALL HAVE NO OBLIGATION OR DUTY TO EXPEND FUNDS FOR, OR OTHERWISE BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONDUCT OR PERFORM, ANY CLEAN-UP REQUIREMENT(S) AS 15 IMPOSED BY ANY FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT LAW, REGULATION, ORDINANCE OR AGENCY FOR THE REMOVAL OF ANY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CONTAMINATION FROM THE REAL PROPERTY. (f) EXCEPT WITH RESPECT TO SELLER'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, PURCHASER, FOR ITSELF AND ITS AFFILIATES, OWNERS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, HEREBY RELEASES AND FOREVER DISCHARGES SELLER AND AND ITS PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE MEMBERS, AFFILIATES, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, ATTORNEYS, ASSIGNS, AND SUCCESSORS-IN-INTEREST FROM ALL PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE CLAIMS, DEMANDS, OBLIGATIONS, LOSSES AND CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER, WHETHER NOW KNOWN OR UNKNOWN, DIRECT OR INDIRECT, FORESEEN OR UNFORESEEN, SUSPECTED OR UNSUSPECTED, WHICH ARE BASED UPON OR ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY, THE MATTERS ADDRESSED IN SUBSECTIONS (a), (b), (c), (d) AND (e) OF THIS SECTION 4.5, AND WITH RESPECT TO ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGES OR ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATIONS, THE PHYSICAL, STRUCTURAL, GEOLOGICAL, MECHANICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL (SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE) CONDITION OF THE REAL PROPERTY (INCLUDING THE IMPROVEMENTS THEREON) OR ANY LAW OR REGULATION RELATING TO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOSSES IN CONNECTION WITH PROPERTY DAMAGE, CLAIMS BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES, DIMINUTION IN VALUE AND PERSONAL INJURY LOSSES. PURCHASER EXPRESSLY UNDERSTANDS AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT IS POSSIBLE THAT UNKNOWN PROBLEMS, CONDITIONS OR LOSSES MAY EXIST WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY AND THAT PURCHASER EXPLICITLY TOOK SUCH INTO ACCOUNT IN DETERMINING THE PURCHASE PRICE FOR THE PROPERTY AND ITS ELECTION TO PROCEED WITH THE PURCHASE THEREOF, AND THAT A PORTION OF SUCH CONSIDERATION, HAVING BEEN BARGAINED FOR BETWEEN THE PARTIES WITH THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH UNKNOWN PROBLEMS (EXCEPT WHERE SELLER KNOWINGLY MADE MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATIONS OR ENGAGED IN FRAUDULENT CONDUCT), CONDITIONS OR CLAIMS, WAS GIVEN IN EXCHANGE FOR A FULL ACCORD, SATISFACTION AND DISCHARGE OF ALL SUCH PROBLEMS, CONDITIONS AND LOSSES. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, THIS RELEASE SPECIFICALLY APPLIES TO ALL LOSSES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER THE COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT OF 1980, AS AMENDED, THE SUPERFUND AMENDMENTS AND REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 1986, (42 U.S.C. SECTIONS 9601 ET SEQ.), THE RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT OF 1976, (42 U.S.C. SECTIONS 6901 ET SEQ.), THE CLEAN WATER ACT, (33 U.S.C. SECTIONS 466 ET SEQ.), THE SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT, (14 16 U.S.C. SECTION 1401-1450), THE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION ACT, (49 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1801 ET SEQ.), THE TOXIC SUBSTANCE CONTROL ACT, (15 U.S.C. SECTIONS 2601-2629), AND ANY OTHER FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL LAW OF SIMILAR EFFECT, AS WELL AS ANY AND ALL COMMON LAW CLAIMS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOREGOING, PURCHASER WAIVES ALL RIGHTS UNDER CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 1542 (AND ALL SIMILAR STATUTES IN ALL OTHER STATES) WHICH STATES IN FULL AS FOLLOWS: "A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR." BY INITIALING THIS AGREEMENT CLAUSE, PURCHASER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THIS SECTION HAS BEEN READ AND FULLY UNDERSTOOD, AND THAT PURCHASER HAS HAD THE CHANCE TO ASK QUESTIONS OF ITS COUNSEL ABOUT ITS MEANING AND SIGNIFICANCE. ---------------------- PURCHASER'S INITIALS (g) "Environmental Damages" means all claims, judgments, damages, losses, penalties, fines, liabilities (including strict liability), encumbrances, liens, costs, and expenses of investigation and defense of any claim, whether or not such claim is ultimately defeated, and of any good faith settlement of judgment, of whatever kind or nature, contingent or otherwise matured or unmatured, foreseeable or unforeseeable, including without limitation reasonable attorneys' fees and disbursements and consultants' fees, any of which are incurred at any time as a result of the existence of Hazardous Materials upon, about, beneath the Real Property or migrating or threatening to migrate to or from the Real Property, or the existence of a violation of Environmental Requirements pertaining to the Real Property, regardless of whether the existence of such Hazardous Materials or the violation of Environmental Requirements arose prior to the present ownership or operation of the Real Property. (h) "Environmental Requirements" means all applicable present and future statutes, regulations, rules, ordinances, codes, licenses, permits, orders, approvals, plans, authorizations, concessions, Licenses, and similar items, of all governmental agencies, departments, commissions, boards, bureaus, or instrumentalities of the United States, states and political subdivisions thereof and all applicable judicial, administrative, and regulatory decrees, judgments, and orders relating to the protection of human health or the environment. 17 (i) "Hazardous Materials" means any substance (i) the presence of which requires investigation or remediation under any federal, state or local statute, regulation, ordinance or policy; or (ii) which is defined as a "hazardous waste" or "hazardous substance" under any federal, state or local statute, regulation or ordinance, including without limitation the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (42 U.S.C. Section 9601 et seq.) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. Section 6901 et seq.) and amendments thereto and regulations promulgated thereunder; or (iii) which is toxic, explosive, corrosive, infectious or otherwise hazardous or is regulated by any federal, state or local governmental authority; or (iv) without limitation which contains polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), asbestos or urea formaldehyde. The provisions of this Section 4.5 shall survive the Close of Escrow. V. CLOSING 5.1 Closing Date. The "Closing Date" for purposes of this Agreement shall be the date thirty (30) days after the expiration or earlier waiver/termination of the Inspection Period, or such earlier or later date as may be agreed upon, in writing, by Seller and Purchaser. The "Close of Escrow" for purposes of this Agreement is defined as the time when the Grant Deed is recorded in the Official Records of Orange County, California, by Escrow Holder. If the Escrow has not closed on or before the Closing Date or any extension thereof, Escrow Holder may nevertheless proceed in accordance with the General Provisions which are attached hereto as Exhibit "F." In the event the Escrow and this Agreement are canceled and terminated, upon Escrow Holder's request, the parties shall pay to Escrow Holder all title and escrow cancellation charges; provided, however, that as an agreement between the parties not to concern Escrow Holder, it is agreed that if termination of the Escrow is caused by the default of one party then such party shall be responsible for all escrow and title cancellation charges, and if the termination occurs where neither party is in default or where both parties are in default, then each party shall be responsible for one-half (1/2) of all title and Escrow cancellation charges. 5.2 Action Prior to the Close of Escrow by Seller. Seller agrees that, provided Purchaser has complied with its obligations under Section 5.3 hereof, on or before 5:00 p.m. California time on the business day immediately preceding the Closing Date, Seller will deposit with Escrow Holder such funds and other items and instruments (executed and acknowledged, if appropriate) as may be necessary in order for Escrow Holder to comply with this Agreement, including, without limitation, the following: 18 (a) A Grant Deed, in the form and content attached hereto as Exhibit "H", prepared and executed by Seller and acknowledged before a Notary Public in the manner provided under the laws of the State of California, assigning, conveying and transferring to Purchaser fee title to the Real Property subject only to the Permitted Exceptions (the "Grant Deed"); (b) Two (2) duplicate originals of a Bill of Sale, in the form and content attached hereto as Exhibit "I", prepared and executed by Seller, assigning, conveying and transferring to Purchaser the Personal Property and the Inventory (the "Bill of Sale"); (c) Two (2) duplicate originals of an Assignment of Intangible Property, in the form and content attached hereto as Exhibit "J", prepared and executed by Seller, assigning and conveying to Purchaser, without representation or warranty, all of Seller's right, title and interest in the Intangible Property (the "Assignment of Intangibles"); (d) Two (2) duplicate originals of an Assignment and Assumption of Contracts, in the form and content attached hereto as Exhibit "K", prepared and executed by Seller, assigning and conveying to Purchaser, all of Seller's right, title and interest under the Contracts (the "Assignment of Contracts"); (e) Two (2) duplicate originals of an Assignment and Assumption of Tenant Leases, in the form and content attached hereto as Exhibit "L", prepared and executed by Seller, assigning and conveying to Purchaser, all of Seller's right, title and interest under the Contracts (the "Assignment of Tenant Leases"); (f) A Non-Foreign Affidavit signed by Seller in the form to be prepared by Escrow Holder (the "Non-Foreign Affidavit"); and (g) Such other funds, instruments or documents as may be necessary to effect or carry out the covenants and obligations to be performed by Seller pursuant to this Agreement. 5.3 Action Prior to the Close of Escrow by Purchaser. Purchaser agrees that on or before 11:00 a.m. California time on the Closing Date, Purchaser will deposit with Escrow Holder all additional funds (in Good Funds) and/or documents (executed and acknowledged, if appropriate) which are necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement, including without limitation: (a) The funds referred to in Section 2.2.2 hereof; (b) Two (2) duplicate originals of the Assignment of Contracts executed by Purchaser; 19 (c) Two (2) duplicate originals of the Assignment of Tenant Leases executed by Purchaser; (d) Two (2) duplicate originals of the Assignment of Intangibles executed by Purchaser; and (e) Such other funds, instruments or documents as may be necessary to effect or carry out the covenants and obligations to be performed by Purchaser pursuant to this Agreement. 5.4 Recording of Grant Deed. Escrow Holder will cause the Grant Deed to be dated and recorded in the Official Records of the County of Orange, State of California and all other conveyance documents deposited with Escrow Holder, dated as of Close of Escrow when (but in no event after the Closing Date) Title Insurer is irrevocably committed to issue the Title Policy to be issued as contemplated in this Agreement, and holds for the account of Seller and Purchaser the items and funds (if any) to be delivered to Seller and Purchaser through the Escrow, after payment of costs, expenses, disbursements and prorations chargeable to Seller or Purchaser pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 5.5 Prorations. 5.5.1 Taxes. All non-delinquent real estate and personal property general and special taxes and assessments, and all association (project or community) dues and assessments, for the Property for the current assessment year shall be prorated on and as of the Close of Escrow. It is understood that any supplemental property tax bill issued as a result of the sale of the Property pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement relating to periods from and after the Close of Escrow, shall be borne by Purchaser. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, Seller shall retain all right, title and interest in and to any and all property tax (both real property and personal property) refunds and claims for refunds with respect to the Property for any period prior to the Close of Escrow. Seller shall be responsible for, and shall pay, all sales, use, documentary, and other transfer taxes imposed in connection with the sale and transfer of the Property. 5.5.2 Advance Reservations. At the Close of Escrow, Seller shall provide Purchaser with a schedule of post-closing confirmed Bookings for the Hotel. Purchaser shall honor all such confirmed and Bookings, provided that such Bookings were booked by Seller in a manner consistent with normal business practices. 5.5.3 Utility Service. Seller shall request each utility company providing utility service to the Real Property to cause all utility billings to be closed and billed as of the Close of Escrow in order that utility charges may be separately billed for the period prior to the Cut-Off Time and the period after the Cut-Off Time. In the event any such utility charges are not separately billed, the same shall be prorated. In connection with any such proration, it shall be 20 presumed that utility charges were uniformly incurred during the billing period in which the Close of Escrow occurs. 5.5.4 Revenue From Operations. As to the Hotel, all revenues from operations, including, without limitation, guest room rentals, revenue from the minibars (if any), banquet rooms rentals, vending machines, coin telephones, and other income-producing equipment arising through 12:01 a.m. California time on the Close of Escrow (the "Cut-Off Time") shall belong to Seller. All revenues from operations, including, without limitation, guest room rentals, revenue from the minibars (if any), banquet rooms rentals, vending machines, coin telephones, and other income producing equipment arising after the Cut-Off Time shall belong to Purchaser. Revenue from guest room rentals for the evening before the date of the Close of Escrow through to the day of the Close of Escrow shall be split equally between Seller and Purchaser. All prepaid rentals, room rental deposits, and all other deposits for advance reservations and Bookings for the period after the Cut-Off Time, shall be credited to Purchaser. 5.5.5 Accounts Payable and Operating Expenses. All obligations and liabilities (for services and materials ordered, or otherwise) and accounts payable for the Hotel and the Real Property owing as of the Cut-Off Time for merchandise, equipment, tour agents' and travel agents' commissions, advertisements, supplies and other materials and services shall be prorated between Seller and Purchaser as of the Cut-Off Time. Seller shall receive a credit for all prepaid expenses. 5.5.6 Miscellaneous Permits and Taxes. All water and sewer charges, taxes (other than ad valorem property taxes), including license taxes or fees for licenses which are assignable or transferable without added cost and have a value which will survive Close of Escrow, including, but not limited to, and any unpaid taxes payable in arrears, shall be prorated as of the Cut-Off Time. Seller will be credited for that portion of taxes and fees paid by Seller allocable to the period after the Cut-Off Time. 5.5.7 Contracts and Tenant Leases. All payments and receipts under the Contracts and the Tenant Leases shall be prorated between Purchaser and Seller as of the Cut-Off Time. Seller shall receive a credit for all prepayments and deposits thereunder. Seller shall pay all fees and other sums due under the Contracts and the Management Agreement for all periods through the Cut-Off Time, except Purchaser shall pay all transfer and assignment fees, and all termination fees and penalties as provided in Section 2.4 hereof. Seller shall receive a credit through the Escrow as of the Closing Date in an amount equal to all sums held in the Reserve Fund. 5.5.8 Other Income. All other income derived by Seller from the Property accruing or relating to the period up to the Cut-Off Time shall be paid to Seller. All other income derived by Seller from the Property accruing or relating to the period after the Cut-Off Time shall be paid to Purchaser. 21 5.5.9 Other Expenses. All other expenses and obligations not otherwise specified in this Section 5.5 incurred in the ownership of the Property and operation of the Hotel shall be prorated between Seller and Purchaser as of the Cut-Off Time. 5.5.10 House Banks. On the Close of Escrow, Seller shall receive a credit through the Escrow for an amount equal to all till money, cash-on-hand, all operating accounts for the Hotel, and all sums in house banks for the Hotel, in which case all right, title and interest to the till money, cash-on-hand and house banks shall be assigned and conveyed by Seller to Purchaser. In the event Seller and Purchaser are unable to agree upon the amount of the till money, cash-on-hand, all operating accounts for the Hotel, and house banks, the provisions of this Section 5.5.10 shall be inapplicable, and title to the till money, cash-on-hand and house banks shall remain with Seller. The failure of Purchaser and Seller to agree on the amounts of the till money, cash-on-hand and house banks shall not be deemed a condition precedent to the obligations of Seller and Purchaser under this Agreement. 5.5.11 Delayed Adjustments. If, at any time following the Closing Date, the amount of an item listed in this Section 5.5 shall prove to be incorrect, the party in whose favor the error was made shall pay to the other party within fifteen (15) days after request the sum necessary to correct such error upon receipt of proof of such error, provided that such proof is delivered to the party from whom payment is requested on or before one hundred eighty (180) days after the Close of Escrow. The acceptance of the closing statement by either party shall not prevent later readjustment pursuant to this Section 5.5.11. After the Close of Escrow, each party shall have reasonable access to the books and records of the other party with respect to all matters set forth in this Section 5.5 for the purposes of determining the accuracy of all adjustments and the performance of the obligations of the parties under this Section 5.5. 5.5.12 Proration Allocation. For proration purposes, the date of the Close of Escrow shall be charged to Purchaser. 5.5.13 Survival. The provisions of this Section 5.5 shall survive the Close of Escrow. 5.6 Guest Property. Property of guests of the Hotel in Seller's care, possession or control (excluding that in guest rooms) on the Closing Date shall be handled in the following manner: 5.6.1 Safe Deposit Boxes. On the day prior to the Closing Date, Seller shall send written notice to guests in the Hotel who have safe deposit boxes advising them of the sale of the Hotel to Purchaser and the procedures to be followed pursuant to this Section 5.6.1. On the Closing Date, Seller shall deliver to Purchaser all keys to the safe deposit boxes in the Hotel, all receipts and agreements relating to such safe deposit boxes, and a complete list of the name and room number of each depositor. Each box in use by a Hotel guest shall then be sealed by representatives of Seller and Purchaser. At Purchaser's option, guests may be requested to 22 remove and verify the contents of the sealed boxes prior to the Close of Escrow. All such removals and verifications shall be under the supervision of a representative to be agreed upon between Purchaser and Seller. Purchaser shall be responsible for all boxes once the seal is broken, and for the contents of all boxes which are verified. Seller shall be responsible for any claims pertaining to any property allegedly deposited in a safe deposit prior to the Closing Date, the seal of which was not broken. Each of Seller and Purchaser shall indemnify and hold the other harmless from and against all claims and losses arising from such indemnifying party's obligations under this Section 5.6.1. The provisions of this Section 5.6.1 shall survive the Close of Escrow. 5.6.2 Baggage Inventory. All guest baggage and other guest property checked and left in the possession, care and control of Seller shall be listed in an inventory to be prepared in duplicate and signed by Seller's and Purchaser's representatives on the Closing Date. Purchaser shall be responsible from and after the Closing Date for all baggage (and the contents thereof) and other guest property listed in inventory. Purchaser agrees to indemnify and save and hold Seller harmless from and against any claim arising out of or with respect to the baggage listed in the inventory, and Seller agrees to indemnify and save and hold Purchaser harmless from and against any claim arising prior to the Closing Date out of or with respect to any guest baggage or other guest property not listed in the inventory. The provisions of this Section 5.6.2 shall survive the Close of Escrow. 5.7 Closing Costs. Seller shall pay for the cost of the premium for the Title Policy, except that, notwithstanding the foregoing, Purchaser shall pay (a) the cost of that portion of the premium for the Title Policy which is in excess of the cost of the premium for an A.L.T.A. Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (standard coverage) for the Real Property, and shall also pay all additional costs for acquiring any additional endorsements to the Title Policy not otherwise included with an A.L.T.A. Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (standard coverage), and (b) all costs of any survey (or update to the Survey) required for the Title Policy. Except as otherwise provided herein, all other fees, taxes and closing costs shall be paid by Seller and Purchaser in accordance with the customs of Garden Grove, California, except that each party shall pay its own attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the consummation of the transaction contemplated herein. 5.8 Distribution of Funds and Documents Following Close of Escrow. Following Close of Escrow, Escrow Holder shall distribute the documents as follows: To Seller: (a) The cash portion of the Purchase Price as set forth in Section 2.2, less costs, offsets and prorations in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; (b) One (1) fully executed duplicate original of the Bill of Sale; 23 (c) One (1) fully executed duplicate original of the Assignment of Intangibles; (d) One (1) fully executed duplicate original of the Assignment of Contracts; (e) One (1) fully executed duplicate original of the Assignment of Tenant Leases; (f) A copy of the Title Policy issued to Purchaser; (g) One (1) duplicate original or conformed copy as appropriate, of any other document to be received by Seller through Escrow pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement; and (h) One (1) copy of any other document delivered to Escrow Holder by Purchaser or Seller pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. To Purchaser: (a) Any excess funds deposited by Purchaser which remain after disbursement to Seller; (b) One (1) conformed copy of the Grant Deed, the original to be mailed to Purchaser following the recordation thereof; (c) One (1) duplicate original of the Bill of Sale; (d) One (1) duplicate original of the Assignment of Intangibles; (e) One (1) duplicate original of the Assignment of Contracts; (f) One (1) duplicate original of the Assignment of Tenant Leases; (g) One (1) duplicate original or conformed copy as appropriate, of any other document to be received by Purchaser through Escrow pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement; (h) One (1) copy of any other document delivered to Escrow Holder by Purchaser or Seller pursuant to the terms of this Agreement; and (i) The original of the Title Policy. 24 5.9 Possession. Purchaser shall be entitled to sole possession of the Property on the Close of Escrow, subject to the possessory rights of any guests of the Hotel and tenants under the Tenant Leases. VI. ADDITIONAL COVENANTS AND INDEMNITIES 6.1 Purchaser's Covenants. 6.1.1 Seller's Accounts Receivable. Purchaser, upon receipt, shall promptly remit to Seller all sums received by Purchaser and Hyatt Corporation in payment of Seller's Accounts Receivable, provided that Purchaser shall have no obligation to pursue collection or incur costs. All sums received by Purchaser and Hyatt Corporation from a customer, guest or patron owing Seller under any such Seller's Account Receivable shall be credited, first, to the sums owing Seller, and then, to the extent any sums remain, to Purchaser. For a period of two (2) years after the Close of Escrow, Seller shall have the right, from time to time, to inspect and audit the books and records of the Hotel that pertain to income and collections, at Seller's sole cost (unless it is determined from such audit or inspection that Purchaser has withheld Seller's Accounts Receivable, then Purchaser shall pay the costs of such audit and inspection), and Purchaser shall provide full and complete access thereto to Seller upon not less than three (3) business days prior Notice, to verify receipt and payment of Seller's Accounts Receivable. 6.1.2 Indemnification for Lawsuits. Purchaser shall indemnify and hold Seller and its affiliates, employees and owners harmless from and against any and all claims, costs, penalties, damages, losses, liabilities and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) of and by third parties arising from or in connection with acts occurring and injuries incurred at or with respect to the Property after the Close of Escrow. The provisions of this Section 6.1.2 shall survive the Close of Escrow. 6.2 Seller's Covenants. 6.2.1 Renovation. Until the Close of Escrow, Seller shall direct Hyatt Corporation to diligently undertake and pursue to completion the Renovation in accordance with the plans therefor as disclosed to Purchaser during the Inspection Period. Purchaser acknowledges that the Renovation will not be completed prior to the Close of Escrow, and that Seller has no obligation to complete it prior to the Close of Escrow. Seller has committed to spend up to Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000) for the Renovation, but Seller makes no representation or warranty that Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000) will be sufficient to complete the Renovation. To the extent Seller has not expended Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000) for the Renovation as of the Closing Date, Seller shall either credit the amount not so spent against the Purchase Price, or pay such amount directly to Purchaser through the Escrow. 25 6.2.2 Operation of the Hotel. Seller, during the term of this Agreement, shall carry on the business and operations of the Hotel in substantially the same manner as heretofore carried on by it and shall cause its manager to cooperate with Seller's obligations under this Section 6.2.2. Prior to the Closing Date, Seller shall maintain (or replace with policies of like amounts) all existing insurance policies insuring the Property and the operation of the Hotel. Seller may enter into, extend, amend, modify or terminate any of the Contracts or the Tenant Leases as Seller deems appropriate to operate, service and maintain the Property consistent with normal business practices; provided, however, that so long as Purchaser is not in default of any of its obligations under this Agreement, (a) from the date of this Agreement to the expiration of the Inspection Period, Seller shall provide to Purchaser copies of new Contracts or Tenant Leases which are not consistent with normal business practices, which Seller has entered into, or intends to enter into, and (b) from and after the expiration of the Inspection Period, Seller shall not, without the consent of Purchaser (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), enter into (i) any leases of furniture, fixtures or equipment for the Hotel, or (ii) any Contract or Tenant Leases. 6.2.3 Indemnification for Taxes. Seller shall indemnify and hold Purchaser harmless from and against all sales, use and transient occupancy taxes due and owing for any period during Seller's ownership of the Hotel. The provisions of this Section 6.2.3 shall survive the Close of Escrow. 6.2.4 Indemnification for Lawsuits. Except for obligations expressly assumed or agreed to be assumed by Purchaser hereunder, Seller shall indemnify and hold Purchaser and its owners, employees and affiliates harmless from and against any and all claims, costs, penalties, damages, losses, liabilities and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) of and by third parties (i.e., persons other than Purchaser and its affiliates) arising from or in connection with acts occurring and injuries incurred at or with respect to the Property prior to the Close of Escrow, excluding, however, claims, costs, penalties, damages, losses, liabilities and expenses pertaining to the condition of the Property. The provisions of this Section 6.2.4 shall survive the Close of Escrow. 6.3 Independent Audit. If and to the extend Seller's financial statements pertaining to the Property for any periods during the three (3) calendar years prior to the Close of Escrow and during the year in which the Close of Escrow occurs have been audited, promptly after the execution of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Purchaser with copies of such audited financial statements and shall cooperate with Purchaser's representatives and independent public accountants to enable them to contact the auditors who prepared such audited financial statements and to obtain, at Purchaser's expense, access to the financial records and work papers supporting such audited financial statements. 6.4 No Obligations of Escrow Holder. Escrow Holder shall not be concerned with the provisions of this Article VI. 26 VII. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 7.1 By Purchaser. Purchaser represents and warrants to Seller that as of the date hereof and the Close of Escrow: 7.1.1 Organization and Standing. Purchaser is a limited partnership, duly organized, validly existing, and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware, is (or will be prior to the Closing Date) duly qualified to do business in the State of California, and has the full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to carry out the transactions contemplated hereby to be carried out by it. 7.1.2 Due Authorization. The performance of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereunder by Purchaser have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Purchaser, and this Agreement is binding on and enforceable against Purchaser in accordance with its terms. Purchaser shall, on or prior to the Closing Date, furnish Seller with certified resolutions evidencing that Purchaser has been duly authorized to enter into and perform this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereunder. No further consent of any shareholder, creditor, board of directors, governmental authority or other party to such execution, delivery and performance hereunder is required. The person(s) signing this Agreement, and any document pursuant hereto on behalf of Purchaser, has full power and authority to bind Purchaser. 7.1.3 Lack of Conflict. Neither the execution of this Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will violate any restriction, court order, judgment, law, regulation, charter, bylaw, instrument or agreement to which Purchaser is subject. 7.1.4 Solvency/Bankruptcy. Purchaser has not (i) made any general assignment for the benefit of creditors, (ii) filed any voluntary petition in bankruptcy or suffered the filing of an involuntary petition in bankruptcy by Purchaser's creditors, (iii) suffered the appointment of a receiver to take possession of all, or substantially all, of Purchaser's assets, (iv) suffered the attachment or other judicial seizure of all, or substantially all, of Purchaser's assets, (v) admitted in writing its inability to pay its debts as they come due, or (vi) made any offer of settlement, extension or compromise to its creditors generally, and has not considered doing or undertaking, and has no current plans to do or undertake, any of the foregoing. Furthermore, Purchaser has not taken, and does not contemplate taking, against it any such actions. 7.2 By Seller. Seller represents and warrants to Purchaser that as of the date hereof and Close of Escrow: 7.2.1 Organization and Standing. Seller is a limited liability company, duly organized, validly existing, and in good standing under the laws of the State of California and 27 has the full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to carry out the transactions contemplated hereby to be carried out by it. 7.2.2 Due Authorization. The performance of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereunder by Seller have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Seller, and this Agreement is binding on and enforceable against Seller in accordance with its terms. Seller shall, on or prior to the Closing Date, furnish Purchaser with certified resolutions evidencing that Seller has been duly authorized to enter into and perform this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereunder. No further consent of any member, manager, creditor, governmental authority or other party to such execution, delivery and performance hereunder is required. The person(s) signing this Agreement, and any document pursuant hereto on behalf of Seller, has full power and authority to bind Seller. 7.2.3 Lack of Conflict. Neither the execution of this Agreement nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will violate any restriction, court order, judgment, law, regulation, charter, bylaw, instrument, or agreement to which Seller or the Property (or any portion thereof) is subject. 7.2.4 Non-Foreign Seller. Seller is not a foreign seller as defined in the "Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act." 7.2.5 Solvency/Bankruptcy. Seller has not (i) made any general assignment for the benefit of creditors, (ii) filed any voluntary petition in bankruptcy or suffered the filing of an involuntary petition in bankruptcy by Seller's creditors, (iii) suffered the appointment of a receiver to take possession of all, or substantially all of Seller's assets, (iv) suffered the attachment or other judicial seizure of all or substantially all, of Seller's assets, (v) admitted in writing its inability to pay its debts as they come due, or (vi) made an offer of settlement, extension or composition to its creditors generally, and has not considered doing or undertaking, and has no current plans to do or undertake any of the foregoing. Furthermore, Seller has not and does not contemplate taking or having taken against it, any such actions. 7.2.6 Litigation. Seller has not been served with, and to the knowledge of Seller there is no pending or threatened, litigation or condemnation proceedings against the Real Property or the Hotel, except that the City of Garden Grove has taken, by condemnation/eminent domain proceedings, a portion of the Real Property (consisting of approximately 1,850 square feet) immediately abutting Harbor Blvd. for a deceleration/right turn lane. 7.2.7 Accuracy of Materials. The copies of the Contracts, the Tenant Leases, and the Management Agreement delivered by Seller to Purchaser are true and correct copies thereof, and are, to Seller's knowledge, all of such Contracts, Tenant Leases, and the Management Agreement. Seller is not, to Seller's knowledge, in material default under any of the terms and provisions thereof, nor has it sent or, to Seller's knowledge, received any written 28 notice of default except as provided to Purchaser. Seller has not sent or received any written notice of a default or breach of any term or provision of the Management Agreement. 7.2.8 Licenses and Permits. The copies of the licenses and permits delivered by Seller to Purchaser are true and correct copies of all of licenses and permits for the Hotel, and to the knowledge of Seller, Seller is in compliance with all obligations thereunder and has not received any written notice of noncompliance under any of them which Seller has not otherwise delivered a copy thereof to Purchaser. All liquor licenses for the operation of alcoholic beverage operations at the Hotel are owned by, and are in the name of, Hyatt Corporation. 7.2.9 Compliance with Laws. To the knowledge of Seller, Seller has not received any notice of its material noncompliance with any applicable governmental laws or regulations. 7.2.10 Financial Statements. The financial statements delivered by Seller to Purchaser for the Hotel fairly present the results of the operations thereof for the periods referenced therein, and are accurate in all material respects. 7.2.11 Title to Real Property. To Seller's knowledge, Seller is the sole owner of fee simple absolute title to the Real Property. 7.2.12 Personal Property and Inventory. All of the Personal Property and Inventory being conveyed by Seller hereunder are free and clear of all liens and encumbrances except for (a) equipment leases that are a part of the Contracts, and (b) those which will be discharged by Seller as of the Close of Escrow, and Seller has good and marketable title to and the right to convey the same in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 7.2.13 Labor and Employment Matters. All employees of the Hotel are employed by Hyatt Corporation pursuant to the Management Agreement. Neither Seller nor Hyatt Corporation is party to any union or other collective bargaining agreement with employees employed at the Hotel. Neither Purchaser or Purchaser's lessee or its management company shall have any liability under any pension, profit sharing or welfare benefit plan that Seller may have established with respect to the Hotel or its employees. 7.2.14 Utilities. To Seller's knowledge, all utilities required for the operation of the Property either enter the Property through adjoining streets or pass through adjoining land in accordance with valid public or private easements, and all such utilities are installed and operating, and all installation and connection charges therefore have been paid in full. 7.2.15 No Commitments. No commitments have been made to any governmental authority, utility company, school board, church or other religious body, or any homeowners' association, group or individual relating to the Real Property which would impose an obligation 29 upon Purchaser to make any contribution or dedication of money or land or to construct, install or maintain any improvements of a public or private nature on or off the real property. Wherever the phrase "to the knowledge of Seller" or any similar phrase stating or implying a limitation on the basis of knowledge appears in this Agreement, unless specifically otherwise qualified, such phrase shall mean the present actual knowledge of Sunil Patel, without any imputation of knowledge or any duty of inquiry or independent investigation of the relevant matter by any of such individual(s), and without any personal liability. Wherever the phrase "in Seller's possession", "in the possession of Seller" or similar phrase appears in this Agreement, such phrase shall be deemed to mean to the extent the material or other item referred to by such phrase is located at the Hotel or in Seller's offices or in its possession. Purchaser shall have the right to submit the foregoing representations and warranties to Hyatt Corporation for its review. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, should any of the foregoing representations and warranties of Seller become false or inaccurate prior to the Close of Escrow, and Seller discloses the same to Purchaser, in writing, prior to the Close of Escrow, then Purchaser's sole recourse shall be to either (i) terminate this Agreement and cancel the Escrow, in which case the Earnest Money Deposit shall be returned to Purchaser and neither Seller nor Purchaser will have any further liability or obligation under this Agreement (except for those obligations which survive in accordance with their terms), or (ii) proceed with the closing, without reservation, in which case Purchaser shall be deemed to have waived all claims against Seller and Hyatt Corporation with respect to such false or inaccurate representation and warranty. VIII. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO CLOSE OF ESCROW 8.1 Conditions to Seller's Obligations. The obligation of Seller to close the Escrow shall be subject to the satisfaction or Notice of its waiver delivered to Purchaser and Escrow Holder in whole or in part, by Seller of each of the following conditions precedent: (a) Except by reason of a default by Seller, Escrow Holder is in a position to and will deliver to Seller the instruments and funds accruing to Seller pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement; (b) There is no existing uncured material breach of any of the covenants, representations, warranties or obligations of Purchaser set forth in this Agreement that has not been waived by Seller; and (c) Seller has been released from all obligations under the Management Agreement by Hyatt Corporation arising after the Close of Escrow. 30 The foregoing conditions contained in this Section 8.1 are intended solely for the benefit of Seller. Seller shall at all times have the right to waive any condition precedent, provided that such waiver is in writing and delivered to Purchaser and Escrow Holder. 8.2 Conditions to Purchaser's Obligations. The obligations of Purchaser to close the Escrow shall be subject to the satisfaction or Notice of its waiver delivered to Seller and Escrow Holder, in whole or in part, by Purchaser of each of the following condition precedent: (a) Except by reason of a default by Purchaser, Escrow Holder is in a position to and will deliver to Purchaser the instruments and funds, if any, accruing to Purchaser pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement; and (b) There is no existing uncured material breach of any of the covenants, representations, warranties or obligations of Seller set forth in this Agreement that has not been waived by Purchaser. (c) Hyatt Corporation shall have delivered its written consent to the assignment and assumption by Seller and Purchaser of the Management Agreement. The foregoing conditions contained in this Section 8.2 are intended solely for the benefit of Purchaser. Purchaser shall at all times have the right to waive any condition precedent, provided that such waiver is in writing and delivered to Seller and Purchaser. 8.3 Failure of Conditions to Close of Escrow. Escrow Holder shall be responsible for confirming, on or before the Close of Escrow, that the conditions to the Close of Escrow set forth in Sections 8.1 and 8.2 hereof, and as set forth elsewhere in this Agreement, have been satisfied. Purchaser and Seller hereby agree to deliver their Notice to Escrow Holder, on or before the Close of Escrow, of the satisfaction or written waiver of all other conditions to the Close of Escrow hereunder, and, in the event that both Purchaser and Seller specifically notify and instruct Escrow Holder to proceed to the Close of Escrow hereunder, all such other conditions to the Close of Escrow hereunder that are not otherwise satisfied shall be deemed to have been waived by both Purchaser and Seller. Escrow Holder shall not proceed to the Close of Escrow hereunder unless both Purchaser and Seller specifically notify and instruct Escrow Holder to do so. IX. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES 9.1 Default by Purchaser. IN THE EVENT THE CLOSING AND THE CONSUMMATION OF THE TRANSACTION HEREIN CONTEMPLATED DOES NOT OCCUR AS HEREIN PROVIDED BY REASON OF ANY MATERIAL DEFAULT OF 31 PURCHASER, PURCHASER AND SELLER AGREE THAT IT WOULD BE IMPRACTICAL AND EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO ESTIMATE THE DAMAGES WHICH SELLER MAY SUFFER. THEREFORE, PURCHASER AND SELLER DO HEREBY AGREE THAT A REASONABLE ESTIMATE OF THE TOTAL DAMAGES THAT SELLER WOULD SUFFER IN THE EVENT THAT PURCHASER DEFAULTS AND FAILS TO COMPLETE THE PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY IS AND SHALL BE, AS SELLER'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY (WHETHER AT LAW OR IN EQUITY), AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE EARNEST MONEY DEPOSIT. SAID AMOUNT SHALL BE THE FULL, AGREED AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES FOR THE FAILURE OF PURCHASER TO CLOSE AND CONSUMMATE THE TRANSACTIONS HEREIN CONTEMPLATED. ALL OTHER CLAIMS TO DAMAGES OR OTHER REMEDIES IN CONNECTION WITH PURCHASER'S FAILURE TO CLOSE AND CONSUMMATE THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREIN ARE EXPRESSLY WAIVED BY SELLER; HOWEVER, SELLER RESERVES ITS RIGHTS TO LEGAL AND EQUITABLE DAMAGES AND REMEDIES FOR THE DEFAULT BY PURCHASER UNDER SECTION 12.18 HEREOF, THE FIFTH AND SIXTH PARAGRAPHS OF SECTION 4.3 HEREOF, AND PURCHASER'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT TO RETURN ALL MATERIALS AND INSTRUMENTS DELIVERED TO PURCHASER BY SELLER OR ITS AGENTS. THE PAYMENT OF SUCH AMOUNT AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES IS NOT INTENDED AS A FORFEITURE OR PENALTY WITHIN THE MEANING OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTIONS 3275 OR 3389, BUT IS INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES TO SELLER PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 1671, 1676 AND 1677. SELLER HEREBY WAIVES THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 3389. UPON DEFAULT BY PURCHASER, THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE TERMINATED AND NEITHER PARTY SHALL HAVE ANY FURTHER RIGHTS OR OBLIGATIONS HEREUNDER, EACH TO THE OTHER, EXCEPT ANY INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS, THE RIGHTS OF SELLER RESERVED HEREIN, AND FOR THE RIGHT OF SELLER TO COLLECT SUCH LIQUIDATED DAMAGES FROM PURCHASER AND ESCROW HOLDER. -------------------- PURCHASER'S INITIALS 9.2 Default by Seller. IN THE EVENT THE CLOSING AND THE CONSUMMATION OF THE TRANSACTION HEREIN CONTEMPLATED DOES NOT OCCUR AS HEREIN PROVIDED BY REASON OF ANY DEFAULT OF SELLER, PURCHASER AND SELLER AGREE THAT IT WOULD BE IMPRACTICAL AND EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO ESTIMATE THE DAMAGES WHICH PURCHASER MAY SUFFER. THEREFORE, PURCHASER AND SELLER DO HEREBY AGREE THAT, IN THE EVENT OF SUCH DEFAULT, IN ADDITION TO ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 12.2 HEREOF, PURCHASER MAY, AS ITS SOLE RECOURSE AND REMEDY (AT LAW OR IN EQUITY), EITHER: (a) PURSUE AN ACTION AGAINST SELLER FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE; OR (b) RECEIVE (i) THE RETURN OF THE 32 EARNEST MONEY DEPOSIT AND (ii) REIMBURSEMENT OF OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSES ACCORDING TO PROOF NOT TO EXCEED AN AGGREGATE OF ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000). ALL OTHER CLAIMS TO DAMAGES OR OTHER REMEDIES IN CONNECTION WITH SELLER'S FAILURE TO CLOSE AND CONSUMMATE THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREIN (OTHER THAN AS SPECIFIED IN (a) AND (b) HEREOF) ARE EXPRESSLY WAIVED BY PURCHASER. THE REFUND OF THE EARNEST MONEY DEPOSIT AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES IS NOT INTENDED AS A FORFEITURE OR PENALTY WITHIN THE MEANING OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTIONS 3275 OR 3389, BUT IS INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES TO PURCHASER PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 1671. PURCHASER HEREBY WAIVES THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 3389. UPON DEFAULT BY SELLER, IF THIS AGREEMENT IS TERMINATED BY PURCHASER, NEITHER PARTY SHALL HAVE ANY FURTHER RIGHTS OR OBLIGATIONS HEREUNDER, EACH TO THE OTHER, EXCEPT ANY INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS, THE RIGHTS OF PURCHASER RESERVED HEREIN, AND FOR THE RIGHT OF PURCHASER TO COLLECT SUCH LIQUIDATED DAMAGES FROM SELLER. ----------------- SELLER'S INITIALS X. BROKERS Seller and Purchaser each agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold the other harmless from and against any claims, actions, suits or demands for payment of any commission, finder's fee or other sum initiated by any broker, commission agent or other person which such party or its representatives has engaged or retained or with which it has had discussions concerning, in connection with the transaction contemplated by this Agreement or the sale of the Property by Seller. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, Seller shall pay a commission to Molinaro Koger pursuant to a separate agreement. XI. NOTICES Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, all notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder ("Notice") shall be in writing and shall be deemed delivered by (i) hand delivery upon receipt, (ii) registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, upon delivery to the address indicated in the Notice, (iii) by confirmed telecopy or facsimile transmission when sent, and (iv) overnight courier (next 33 business day delivery) on the next business day at 12:00 noon, whichever shall occur first, as follows: To Seller: ATRIUM PLAZA, LLC Attention: Renee Molloy 620 Newport Center Drive Fourteenth Floor Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone: (949) 610-80__ Telecopier: (949) 610-82__ With a Copy to: EDWARD G. COSS, ESQ. 620 Newport Center Drive Fourteenth Floor Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telecopier: (949) 610-8222 To Purchaser: ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. Attn: David A. Brooks 14185 Dallas Parkway - 11th Floor Dallas, TX 75240 Telephone: (972-980-2700 Telecopier: (972) 778-9261 With a Copy to: Cindy Nelson, Esq. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP 1700 Pacific Avenue Suite 4100 Dallas, TX 75244 Telecopier: (214) 969-4343 Any correctly addressed Notice that is refused, unclaimed or undelivered because of an act or omission of the party to be notified shall be considered to be effective as of the first day that the Notice was refused, unclaimed or considered undeliverable by the postal authorities, messenger or overnight delivery service. The parties hereto shall have the right from time to time, and at any time, to change their respective addresses and each shall have the right to specify as its address any other address within the United States of America, by giving to the other party at least thirty (30) days prior Notice thereof, in the manner prescribed herein; provided, however, that to be effective, any such change of address must be actually received (as evidenced by a return receipt). Telephone numbers and email addresses, if listed, are listed for convenience purposes only and not for the purposes of giving Notice pursuant to this Agreement. 34 XII. MISCELLANEOUS 12.1 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any legal action is necessary to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the parties hereby agree that the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, shall be the sole jurisdiction and venue for the bringing of the action. 12.2 Professional Fees and Costs. If a lawsuit, arbitration or other proceedings are instituted by any party to enforce any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement against any other party hereto, the prevailing party in such litigation, arbitration or proceedings shall be entitled, as an additional item of damages, to such reasonable attorneys' and other professional fees and costs (including, but not limited to, witness fees), court costs, arbitrators' fees, arbitration administrative fees, travel expenses, and other out-of pocket expenses or costs of such other proceedings, as may be fixed by any court of competent jurisdiction, arbitrator or other judicial or quasi-judicial body having jurisdiction thereof, whether or not such litigation or proceedings proceed to a final judgment or award. For the purposes of this section, any party receiving an arbitration award or a judgment for damages or other amounts shall be deemed to be the prevailing party, regardless of amount of the damage awarded or whether the award or judgment was based on all or some of such party's claims or causes of action. 12.3 Exhibits and Schedules a Part of This Agreement. The Exhibits and Schedules attached hereto are incorporated in this Agreement by reference and are hereby made a part hereof. 12.4 Executed Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute but one and the same instrument; signature pages may be detached from multiple separate counterparts and attached to a single counterpart so that all signature pages are physically attached to the same document. This Agreement shall become effective upon the due execution and delivery of this Agreement to the parties hereto. 12.5 Assignment. Purchaser may not assign, convey and otherwise transfer all or any part of its interest or rights herein without the prior written consent of Seller, which consent may be withheld in Seller's sole discretion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, Purchaser may assign and transfer all of its rights and obligations under this Agreement to one (1) or more wholly owned subsidiary(ies) thereof, or to a one hundred percent (100%) owned affiliate(s) thereof, provided, however, that Purchaser shall not be released of its obligations under this Agreement as a result of any such assignment. Any assignment as permitted in the preceding sentence shall be conditioned upon Purchaser delivering to Seller and Escrow Holder, within 35 forty-eight (48) hours of any such assignment, Notice thereof, together with a copy of such assignee's organizational and formation documents and instruments, a Certificate of Good Standing for such assignee, and copies of the resolutions of Purchaser and such assignee authorizing such assignment. As a further condition to any such permitted assignment, Purchaser shall cause its assignee to execute an assignment and assumption agreement of Purchaser's obligations under this Agreement (in form and content reasonably and mutually acceptable), and such other documents and instruments as Escrow Holder may reasonably request. 12.6 IRS - Form 1099-S. For purposes of complying with Section 6045 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, Escrow Holder shall be deemed the "person responsible for closing the transaction" and shall be responsible for obtaining the information necessary to file with the Internal Revenue Service Form 1099-S, "Statement for Recipients of Proceeds from Real Estate, Broker and Barter Exchange Transactions." 12.7 Successors and Assigns. Subject to the provisions of Section 12.5 hereof, this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties' respective successors and permitted assigns. 12.8 Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. 12.9 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, and Exhibits and Schedules and other documents and instruments attached to or referenced herein, contain all representations and the entire understanding and agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the purchase and sale of the Property, and all prior and contemporaneous understandings, letters of intent, agreements and representations, whether oral or written, are entirely superseded. No amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and executed by the parties hereto. 12.10 Further Assurances. Whenever and so often as requested by a party, the other party will promptly execute and deliver or cause to be executed and delivered all such other and further instruments, documents or assurances, and promptly do or cause to be done all such other and further things as may be necessary and reasonably required in order to further and more fully vest in such requesting party all rights, interests, powers, benefits privileges and advantages conferred or intended to be conferred upon it by this Agreement. 12.11 Waiver. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any other provisions, nor shall any waiver be a continuing waiver. 12.12 Headings. The headings of this Agreement are for purposes of convenience only and shall not limit or define the meaning of the provisions of this Agreement. 36 12.13 Risk of Loss. (a) Risk of Loss. Until the Closing Date, Seller shall bear the risk of loss should there be damage to any of the Improvements by fire or other casualty (collectively "Casualty"). If, prior to the Closing Date, any of the Improvements shall be damaged by any Casualty, Seller shall promptly deliver to Purchaser a Notice ("Casualty Notice") of such event. Upon Purchaser's receipt of a Casualty Notice, Seller and Purchaser shall meet promptly to estimate the cost to repair and restore the Improvements to good condition and to replace the damaged Personal Property (the "Casualty Renovation Cost"). If the parties are unable to agree on the cost of restoration, the matter will be submitted to an engineer designated by Seller and an engineer designated by Purchaser, each licensed to practice in the state in which the Land is located, and the engineers shall resolve the dispute. Each party hereto shall bear the costs and expenses of its own engineer. (b) Material Loss. If the Casualty Renovation Cost exceeds (i) fifteen percent (15%) of the Purchase Price in the event the Casualty is insured against, or (ii) five percent (5%) of the Purchase Price in the event the Casualty is not insured against, either party hereto may, at its option, elect to terminate this Agreement by Notice to the other party within five (5) days after the date that the Casualty Renovation Cost is determined, in which case the Earnest Money Deposit shall be delivered to Purchaser, and neither party shall have any further rights or obligations hereunder, except for any continuing confidentially and indemnity obligations as provided in this Agreement. If both parties hereto fail to timely make its election to terminate this Agreement, then the Close of Escrow shall take place as provided herein without reduction of the Purchase Price, and Seller shall assign the insurance proceeds to Purchaser in the event the Casualty is insured against or have the Purchase Price reduced by the Casualty Renovation Cost in the event the Casualty is not insured against. (c) Nonmaterial Loss. If the Casualty Renovation Cost is (i) fifteen percent (15%) or less of the Purchase Price in the event the Casualty is insured against, or (ii) five percent (5%) or less of the Purchase Price in the event the Casualty is not insured against, then, in any such event, neither party hereto shall have any right to terminate this Agreement, but the Closing shall take place as provided herein without reduction of the Purchase Price, and Seller shall assign the insurance proceeds to Purchaser in the event the Casualty is insured against or have the Purchase Price reduced by the Casualty Renovation Cost in the event the Casualty is not insured against. (d) Eminent Domain. If, prior to the Close of Escrow, (i) all or substantially all (or so much thereof so as to substantially and materially interfere with the operation of the Hotel) of the Real Property, (ii) any portion of the parking areas on the Real Property which results in there being insufficient parking for the operation of the Hotel as established by applicable governmental codes and regulations, or (iii) any access-way to the Real Property or any building with guest rooms is taken by condemnation or eminent domain, at the election of Purchaser this Agreement shall, upon the giving of Notice of such event or of 37 the condemning authorities' intention so to take the Real Property, terminate, and Purchaser shall receive a full and prompt refund of all sums deposited by them with Escrow Holder and/or Seller. If, prior to the Close of Escrow, less than all or substantially all of the Real Property shall be taken by condemnation or eminent domain, then, if any of the foregoing, in Purchaser's reasonable opinion, materially impairs the value of the Real Property or any significant interest therein, then Purchaser shall have the option to (A) accept title to the Real Property subject to such taking, in which event at the Close of Escrow all of the proceeds of any award or payment made or to be made by reason of such taking shall be assigned by Seller to Purchaser, and any money theretofore received by Seller in connection with such taking shall be paid over to Purchaser, whereupon Purchaser shall pay the Purchase Price without abatement by reason of such taking, or (B) receive a full and prompt refund of all sums deposited by Purchaser with Escrow Holder and/or Seller. Seller shall not settle, agree to, or accept any award or payment in connection with a taking of less than all of the Real Property without obtaining Purchaser's prior written consent in each case, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. 12.14 Construction of Agreement. The parties hereto have negotiated this Agreement at length, and have had the opportunity to consult with, and be represented by, their own competent counsel. This Agreement is, therefore, deemed to have been jointly prepared. In determining the meaning of, or resolving any ambiguity with respect to, any word, phrase or provision of this Agreement, no uncertainty or ambiguity shall be construed or resolved against any party under any rule of construction, including the party primarily responsible for the drafting and preparation of this Agreement.The words "herein," "hereof," "hereunder" and words of similar reference shall mean this Agreement. The words "this Agreement" include the exhibits, schedules addenda and any future written modifications, unless otherwise indicated by the context. All words in this Agreement shall be deemed to include any number or gender as the context or sense of the Agreement requires. The words "will," "shall" and "must" in this Agreement indicate a mandatory obligation. The use of the words "include," "includes" and "including" followed by one or more examples is intended to be illustrative and is not a limitation on the scope of the description or term for which the examples are provided. All dollar amounts set forth in this Agreement are stated in United States Dollars, unless otherwise specified. The words "day" and "days" refer to calendar days unless otherwise stated. The words "business day" refer to a day other than a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday on which banking institutions are closed. The words "month" and "months" refer to calendar months unless otherwise stated. The words "year" and "years" refer to calendar years unless otherwise stated. 12.15 Tax Deferred Exchange. Seller and Purchaser (the "Cooperating Party") each agree to fully cooperate with the other and their owners (the "Exchangor") (including cooperation with any Intermediary (as defined herein) selected by Exchangor) to structure the acquisition of the Property and/or the Real Property as an exchange of property held for 38 productive use in a trade or business or for investment within the meaning of Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as amended), and upon request, Cooperating Party agrees to execute additional escrow instructions, documents, agreements or instruments to effect the exchange; provided, however, that Cooperating Party shall incur no additional costs or expenses in this transaction, or be required to acquire, accept or hold title to any property (other than the Property), as a result of or in connection with any such exchange, unless because of Cooperating Party's default hereunder or under any agreement executed by reason of this Section 12.15. In connection therewith, Seller shall have the right to dissolve and distribute the Property to the owners of Seller as tenants-in-common, who will then be obligated to convey title thereto to Purchaser consistent with the terms of this Agreement. In the event of any such dissolution and liquidation of Seller, Purchaser covenants and agrees to cooperate with Seller and such owners/assignees in connection therewith, and to execute new purchase and sale agreements with each such owner/assignee on the same terms hereof (with appropriate cross-default and conveyance covenants/conditions precedent in favor of Purchaser) except that the Purchase Price and Earnest Money Deposit would be adjusted prorata based upon each such owner's/assignee's percentage interest and title. No such dissolution and assignment would delay the Close of Escrow. Exchangor agrees to indemnify, defend or hold Cooperating Party harmless from and against any and all additional costs, expenses, claims, demands, liabilities, losses, obligations, damages, recoveries, and deficiencies (such categories being collectively referred to herein as "Liabilities") in excess of those Liabilities that Cooperating Party would otherwise have if the transaction contemplated in this Agreement closes as a sale transaction, and that Cooperating Party may incur or suffer, as a result of or in connection with (i) the structuring of the transaction contemplated in this Agreement as an exchange under Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 and/or (ii) the execution of any documents in connection with the exchange. Exchangor's foregoing indemnity shall not indemnify Cooperating Party for any Liabilities arising as a result of or in connection with any default by Cooperating Party under this Agreement or any default by Cooperating Party under any of the documents or agreements entered into by Cooperating Party in connection with the exchange or for any negligence or willful misconduct on the part of Cooperating Party. Implementation of the exchange(s) contemplated in this Section 12.15 shall not be a condition to the Close of Escrow. Exchangor, at its election, may substitute for any one or more of them, one or more persons or entities ("Intermediary") as a party(ies) to the Escrow and this Agreement, in which event the Intermediary shall assume and perform the obligations of Exchangor under this Agreement (but without the release of liability of Exchangor for such performance), and Cooperating Party agrees to accept the performance by Intermediary and shall tender its performance to Intermediary. 39 12.16 No Public Disclosure. Purchaser shall make no public disclosure of the terms of this transaction unless required by applicable law and only after the release of the Earnest Money Deposit to Seller. 12.17 Covenants, Representations and Warranties. Except as otherwise set forth in this Agreement, all of the covenants, representations and agreements of Seller and Purchaser set forth in this Agreement shall survive the Close of Escrow, except that all representatives and warranties shall survive only for a period of twelve (12) months after the Close of Escrow. By proceeding with the closing of the sale transaction, Seller and Purchaser shall be deemed to have waived, and so covenant to waive, any claims of defaults or breaches by the other party existing on or as of the Close of Escrow whether under this Agreement and any other document or instrument executed by the other party in connection with this transaction, of which the waiving party was aware prior to the Close of Escrow for which the other party shall have no liability. 12.18 Confidentiality. Other than as required or permitted by the terms of this Agreement, neither Purchaser nor its agents or representatives shall disclose, in any manner whatsoever, (a) the information provided to Purchaser by Seller or its representatives, or (b) any analyses, compilations, studies or other documents or records prepared by or on behalf of Purchaser, in connection with Purchaser's due diligence investigation of the Property, without first obtaining the written consent of Seller (collectively, "Proprietary Information"). The foregoing shall not preclude Purchaser (i) from discussing the Proprietary Information with any person who is employed by Purchaser or who, on behalf of Purchaser, is actively and directly participating in the purchase and sale of the Property, including, without limitation, to Purchaser's shareholders, partners, members, existing or prospective lenders, attorneys, accountants and other consultants and advisors, or (ii) from complying with all laws, rules, regulations and court orders, including, without limitation, governmental regulatory, disclosure, tax and reporting requirements; provided, however, that if Purchaser is required by applicable law or legal process to disclose any Proprietary Information, Purchaser agrees to furnish only that portion of the Proprietary Information which Purchaser is legally compelled to disclose and to use its best efforts to obtain assurance that, if possible, confidential treatment will be accorded to the Proprietary Information. Purchaser shall inform its respective representatives of the confidential nature of the Proprietary Information and shall direct them to be bound by the terms of this section. In addition to any other remedies available to Seller, Seller shall have the right to seek equitable relief, including, without limitation, injunctive relief or specific performance, against Purchaser in order to enforce the provisions of this section. The provisions of this section shall survive any termination of this Agreement.Purchaser agrees not to contact, directly or indirectly, any employees of the Hotel prior to the Close of Escrow, and agrees to be liable for all of Seller's damages in the event of any such contact by Purchaser or any of its agents or representatives. 40 12.19 Limitation on Liability. In consideration of the benefits accruing hereunder, Seller and Purchaser agree that, in the event of any actual or alleged failure, breach or default of this Agreement by Seller or Purchaser: (a) The sole and exclusive remedy shall be against the defaulting party and its assets; (b) No owner of the defaulting party shall be sued or named as a party in any suit or action; (c) No service of process shall be made against any owner or employee of the defaulting party (except as may be necessary to secure jurisdiction of the defaulting party); (d) No owner or employee of the defaulting party shall be required to answer or otherwise plead to any service of process; (e) No judgment may be taken against any owner or employee of the defaulting party; (f) Any judgment taken against any owner or employee of the defaulting party may be vacated and set-aside at any time without hearing; (g) No claims shall be made against Flamingo Street, LLC, HT-Anaheim, L.L.C., or Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.; (h) No writ of execution will ever be levied against the assets of any owner or employee of the defaulting party; and (i) These covenants and agreements are enforceable both by the defaulting party and also by any owner or employee of the defaulting party. 12.20 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. Seller and Purchaser agree that there are no third parties who are intended to benefit from or who are entitled to rely on any of the provisions of this Agreement. No third party shall be entitled to assert any claims or to enforce any rights whatsoever pursuant to this Agreement. The covenants and agreements provided in this Agreement are solely for the benefit of Seller and Purchaser and their permitted successors and assigns respectively. 12.21 Facsimile Signatures. The execution of this Agreement and all Notices given hereunder and all amendments hereto, may be effected by facsimile signatures, all of which shall be treated as originals; provided, however, that the party receiving a document with a facsimile signature may, by Notice to the other, require the prompt delivery of an original signature to 41 evidence and confirm the delivery of the facsimile signature. Purchaser and Seller each intend to be bound by its respective facsimile transmitted signature, and is aware that the other party will rely thereon, and each party waives any defenses to the enforcement of the Agreement, and documents, and any Notices delivered by facsimile transmission. [The Remainder of This Page Has Been Intentionally Left Blank] [Signatures are on the Following Page] 42 XIII. EXECUTION IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the 28th day of July, 2004. SELLER: ATRIUM PLAZA, LLC a California limited liability company BY: FLAMINGO STREET, LLC, a California limited liability company, Its Manager By: MSP ONE, LLC, a California limited liability company, Its Manager BY: /s/ Sunil Patel ------------------------------- NAME: Sunil Patel TITLE: Manager PURCHASER: ASHFORD HOSPITALITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited partnership By: Ashford Properties General Partner LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its general partner BY: /s/ David A. Brooks ----------------------------------- NAME: David A. Brooks TITLE: Vice President ESCROW HOLDER HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES TO THE ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT. THE HERITAGE ESCROW COMPANY BY: /s/ Janet Tilbury --------------------------------- Janet Tilbury, Escrow Officer Dated: 7-30-04 43
EX-10.22.1 3 d23137exv10w22w1.txt AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT Exhibit 10.22.1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS (Hyatt Regency Orange County) THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS (the "Amendment") is dated the 26th day of August, 2004, and is made by and between ATRIUM PLAZA, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Seller"), and ASHFORD HOSPITALITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited partnership ("Purchaser"). RECITALS A. Seller and Purchaser have previously executed and entered into that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions dated as of July 28, 2004 (the "Agreement"), for the sale by Seller, and the purchase by Purchaser, of the property located at 100 Alicante Plaza, Garden Grove, California, in, on, by and through which is operated a hotel and hospitality business under the name "Hyatt Regency Orange County." B. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Inspection Period expires on August 27, 2004. C. Purchaser has advised Seller that it has yet to complete its due diligence and inspection of the Property, and has requested that Seller agree to extend the Inspection Period. D. Seller is amenable to extending the Inspection Period provided that the entire amount of the Earnest Money Deposit is delivered by Purchaser to Escrow Holder and deposited into the Escrow, and that the sum of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) thereof is immediately released to Seller on a non-refundable basis, all as more fully set forth hereinbelow. E. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, with reference to the foregoing Recitals, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, Seller and Purchaser hereby agree as follows: I. AMENDMENT 1.1 In consideration of Purchaser's performance of its obligations under this Amendment, Seller and Purchaser agree to extend the Inspection Period to 3:00 p.m. California time on September 17, 2004. 1 1.2 On or before 1:00 p.m. California time on August 27, 2004, Purchaser shall deposit into the Escrow with Escrow Holder an additional Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($700,000), for a total Earnest Money Deposit on deposit with Escrow Holder of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000). Together with the deposit of the additional Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($700,000), Purchaser shall deliver to Escrow Holder irrevocable and unconditional instructions for the immediate release of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) of the Earnest Money Deposit (the "Released Deposit") to Seller (or Seller's Intermediary, as directed by Seller). Purchaser and Seller agree that the Released Deposit shall be non-refundable to Purchaser, whether or not Purchaser elects to proceed with the transaction memorialized in the Agreement (including based upon the final results of its due diligence review and inspection and election to terminate the Agreement as permitted in Section 4.4 thereof). 1.3 Upon the expiration of the Inspection Period, that portion of the Earnest Money Deposit then held by Escrow Holder (i.e., the sum of $500,000) shall become non-refundable to Purchaser (unless prior thereto, Seller and Escrow Holder receive from Purchaser a Notice in accordance with the requirements of Section 4.4 of the Agreement that Purchaser elects to terminate the Agreement and cancel the Escrow). The Earnest Money Deposit (including the Released Deposit) shall be applied and credited to the Purchase Price at the Close of Escrow. 1.4 The Closing Date shall be September 27, 2004. 1.5 Purchaser acknowledges that, as of the date of this Amendment, to the best knowledge of Purchaser, Seller is not in default of any of its covenants and obligations under the Agreement, and that Seller has complied with all of its covenants and obligations to Purchaser or otherwise as required by the terms of the Agreement and/or applicable law. Purchaser also acknowledges that it is not aware of any breaches of any of the representations and warranties of Seller included in the Agreement. II. RATIFICATION Except as amended and/or modified by this Amendment, the Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed and all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and affect, unaltered and unchanged by this Amendment. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Amendment and the provisions of the Agreement, the provisions of this Amendment shall prevail. Whether or not specifically amended by the provisions of this Amendment, all of the terms and provisions of the Agreement are hereby amended to the extent necessary to give effect to the purpose and intent of this Amendment. III. COUNTERPARTS This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, when taken together, will constitute one and the same instrument. The signature page of any counterpart may be detached therefrom without impairing 2 the legal effect of the (signature) thereon, provided such signature page is attached to any other counterpart identical thereto except as having additional signature pages executed by other parties to this Amendment attached hereto. The execution of this Amendment may be effected by facsimile signatures, all of which shall be treated as originals; provided, however, that a party receiving this Amendment with a facsimile signature may, by Notice to the other, require the prompt delivery of an original signature to evidence and confirm the delivery of the facsimile signature. Purchaser and Seller each intend to be bound by its respective facsimile transmitted signature, and is aware that the other party will rely thereon, and each party waives any defenses to the enforcement of this Amendment. IV. EXECUTION IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. SELLER: ATRIUM PLAZA, LLC a California limited liability company BY: FLAMINGO STREET, LLC, a California limited liability company, Its Manager By: MSP ONE, LLC, a California limited liability company, Its Manager BY: /s/ Sunil Patel --------------------------------- NAME: Sunil Patel TITLE: Manager PURCHASER: ASHFORD HOSPITALITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited partnership By: Ashford Properties General Partner LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its general partner BY: /s/ David A. Brooks ------------------------------------- NAME: David A. Brooks TITLE: Vice President 3 EX-10.22.2 4 d23137exv10w22w2.txt AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT Exhibit 10.22.2 SECOND AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS (Hyatt Regency Orange County) THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS (the "Amendment") is dated the 28th day of September, 2004, and is made by and among ATRIUM PLAZA, LLC, a California limited liability company (sometimes "Atrium Plaza"), ASHFORD HOSPITALITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited partnership ("Ashford"), ASHFORD ANAHEIM LP, a Delaware limited partnership ("Assignee"), and ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA HOTEL, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (sometimes "OCC"). RECITALS A. Atrium Plaza and Ashford have previously executed and entered into that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions dated as of July 28, 2004, as amended (collectively the "Agreement"), for the sale by Atrium Plaza, and the purchase by Ashford, of the property located at 100 Alicante Plaza, Garden Grove, California, in, on, by and through which is operated a hotel and hospitality business under the name "Hyatt Regency Orange County." B. OCC, formerly a member of Atrium Plaza, has liquidated its interest in the Atrium Plaza and, as a result thereof, has acquired an undivided fifty percent (50%) interest in the Property and the Contracts, as tenants-in-common with Atrium Plaza. C. Ashford desires to assign its interest under the Agreement to Assignee. D. In addition, the "Land" shall be revised to delete Lot 4 therefrom, and to provide that Seller or its assignee shall grant an easement over and on thereto to Purchaser (as its assignee), all as more fully set forth herein. E. Atrium Plaza, Purchaser and OCC also desire to amend and modify the Agreement to reflect the inclusion of OCC as a "Seller" under the Agreement, and to reflect and confirm the obligations of OCC to sell its undivided fifty percent (50%) tenant-in-common interest in the Property to Purchaser pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Agreement. F. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, with reference to the foregoing Recitals, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, Atrium Plaza, OCC and Purchaser hereby agree as follows: 1 I. AMENDMENT 1.1 The Agreement is hereby modified and amended to reflect that "Seller" shall mean each of Atrium Plaza and OCC, each holding an undivided fifty percent (50%) interest as tenants-in-common, in and to the Property. OCC hereby specifically assumes, on a joint and several basis with Atrium Plaza, the obligations of the "Seller" under the Agreement, and covenants and agrees to perform all of the obligations of the "Seller" as if it was an original party to the Agreement. Reference to "Seller" in the Agreement shall refer to each of Atrium Plaza and OCC, and a reference herein to "Sellers" shall refer to both of Atrium Plaza and OCC. 1.2 Atrium and OCC shall perform all of the obligations of the "Seller" under the Agreement, and shall convey to Purchaser the title to the Property as required under the Agreement. Accordingly, Exhibits "H", "I", "J", "K", and "L" to the Agreement are hereby revised as attached hereto as corresponding exhibits. On the Closing Date, each of Atrium Plaza and OCC shall convey their respective undivided fifty percent (50%) interests in the Property and the Contracts to the grantees and assignees set forth in the aforementioned conveyance documents, and the parties agree that a default by either Atrium Plaza or OCC in so conveying its interest in the Property to Purchaser shall be deemed a default by the other Seller. 1.3 All costs and prorations under Sections 5.5 and 5.7 of the Agreement, and all other costs, liabilities, expenses and fees, otherwise allocable to the "Seller" by the terms of the Agreement, shall be allocated between Sellers on an equal basis. On the Closing Date, the Purchase Price (after adjustment for all prorations, costs and other expenses as provided in the Agreement) shall be disbursed one-half (1/2) to Atrium Plaza and one-half (1/2) to OCC in accordance with each Seller's separate instructions delivered, in writing, to Escrow Holder. In addition, to the extent of any post-closing credits back or refunds to the "Owner" under the Management Agreement for periods prior to the Closing Date, Purchaser shall promptly remit the same to Sellers in equal amounts. 1.4 All indemnification obligations of the "Seller" under the Agreement shall be the joint and several obligations of Sellers. 1.5 The obligation of the "Purchaser" to close the Escrow and purchase the Property shall be contingent upon the performance by both OCC and Atrium Plaza of the obligations of the "Seller" under the Agreement. 1.6 As permitted by Section 12.5 of the Agreement, Ashford hereby assigns to Assignee, and Assignee hereby assumes, all of Ashford's right, title and interest in and to the Agreement to be effective on the date set forth above. Assignee shall be the "Purchaser" under the Agreement, and shall perform all other duties of the "Purchaser" pursuant to the terms thereof. Assignee agrees to be bound by all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement. Notwithstanding this assignment, Ashford shall not be released from any of its obligations under the Agreement. 2 1.7 On the Close of Escrow, Sellers shall assign and transfer to Purchaser all of their right, title and interest in and to the Reserve Fund (as defined in the Management Agreement) and the Renovation Account (the "Renovation Account"), both of which are maintained by Hyatt Corporation . The transferred funds shall be used to fund the Renovation. In addition, on the Closing Date and through the Escrow, each of Atrium and OCC shall fund into the Renovation Account, an amount equal to one-half (1/2) of the difference between (a) Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000), and (b) the sum of (i) the aggregate amounts then on deposit in the Reserve Fund and the Renovation Account and (ii) the aggregate funds disbursed for the Renovation. 1.8 The Closing Date shall be October 1, 2004. 1.9 The description of the Land on Exhibit "C" to the Agreement is hereby revised as set forth on revised Exhibit "C" attached hereto, to reflect the deletion of the parcel of land described on Exhibit "M" attached hereto ("Lot 4") from the Land. 1.10 Sellers hereby grant, or shall cause the owner of Lot 4 to grant, a perpetual easement for use of Lot 4 to Purchaser or its designee, pursuant to the terms of an easement in form and content acceptable to Sellers and Purchaser in their sole discretions (the "Easement"). The Easement shall provide that Purchaser shall obtain and maintain all insurance thereon (including environmental coverage reasonably satisfactory to Sellers after the existing policy expires, naming Sellers and the owner of Lot 4 as additional insureds, pay all property taxes, and comply with all laws, regulations and ordinances with respect thereto, including, but not limited to, all environmental laws and requirements, except Purchaser shall not be obligated to remove any underground storage tanks or remediate pre-existing contamination. II. RATIFICATION Except as amended and/or modified by this Amendment, the Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed and all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and affect, unaltered and unchanged by this Amendment. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Amendment and the provisions of the Agreement, the provisions of this Amendment shall prevail. Whether or not specifically amended by the provisions of this Amendment, all of the terms and provisions of the Agreement are hereby amended to the extent necessary to give effect to the purpose and intent of this Amendment. III. COUNTERPARTS This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, when taken together, will constitute one and the same instrument. The signature page of any counterpart may be detached therefrom without impairing the legal effect of the (signature) thereon, provided such signature page is attached to any other counterpart identical thereto except as having additional signature pages executed by other parties to this Amendment attached hereto. The execution of this Amendment may be effected 3 by facsimile signatures, all of which shall be treated as originals; provided, however, that a party receiving this Amendment with a facsimile signature may, by Notice to the other, require the prompt delivery of an original signature to evidence and confirm the delivery of the facsimile signature. Purchaser and Sellers each intend to be bound by its respective facsimile transmitted signature, and is aware that the other party will rely thereon, and each party waives any defenses to the enforcement of this Amendment. IV. FACSIMILE SIGNATURES The execution of this Amendment may be effected by facsimile signatures, all of which shall be treated as originals; provided, however, that the party receiving a document with a facsimile signature may, by Notice to the other, require the prompt delivery of an original signature to evidence and confirm the delivery of the facsimile signature. The parties hereto each intend to be bound by its respective facsimile transmitted signature, and is aware that the other parties will rely thereon, and each party waives any defenses to the enforcement of the Amendment, and documents, and any Notices delivered by facsimile transmission. [The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank] [Signatures on following page] 4 V. EXECUTION IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. SELLERS: ATRIUM PLAZA, LLC a California limited liability company BY: FLAMINGO STREET, LLC, a California limited liability company, Its Manager BY: MSP ONE, LLC, a California limited liability company, Its Manager By: /s/ Sunil Patel -------------------------------- Name: Sunil Patel Title: Manager ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA HOTEL, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company BY: HYATT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation By: /s/ Kirk A. Rose -------------------------------- Name: Kirk A. Rose Title: Senior VP - Finance & Treasurer ASHFORD: ASHFORD HOSPITALITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited partnership BY: Ashford Properties General Partner LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its general partner By: /s/ David A. Brooks -------------------------------- Name: David A. Brooks Title: Vice President [SIGNATURES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE] 5 ASSIGNEE: ASHFORD ANAHEIM LP, a Delaware limited partnership BY: ASHFORD PROPERTIES GENERAL PARTNER LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: /s/ David A. Brooks -------------------------------- Name: David Brooks Title: Vice President 6 EX-21.1 5 d23137exv21w1.txt REGISTRANTS SUBSIDIARIES LISTING Exhibit 21.1 ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC. SUBSIDIARIES LISTING Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. Ashford OP General Partner LLC Ashford OP Limited Partner LLC Ashford Hospitality Limited Partnership Ashford Properties General Partner LLC Ashford Properties General Partner Sub I LLC Ashford Properties General Partner Sub II LLC Ashford Properties General Partner Sub III LLC Ashford TRS Corporation Ashford TRS I LLC Ashford TRS II LLC Ashford Hospitality Finance LP Ashford Hospitality Finance General Partner Corp. Ashford Finance Subsidiary I GP LLC Ashford Finance Subsidiary I LP Ashford Atlantic Beach LP Ashford Austin LP Ashford BWI Airport LP Ashford BWI Borrower LLC Ashford Bucks County LLC Bucks County Member LLC Ashford Buford I LP Ashford Buford II LP Ashford Covington LP Ashford Dallas LP Ashford Dulles LP Ashford Holtsville LP Ashford Kennesaw I LP Ashford Kennesaw II LP Ashford Las Vegas LP Ashford Syracuse LP Ashford Dayton LP Ashford Columbus LP Ashford Phoenix LP Ashford Flagstaff LP Ashford Jacksonville I LP Ashford Jacksonville II LP Ashford Mobile LP Ashford Lawrenceville LP Ashford Buena Vista LP Ashford Atlantic Beach LP Ashford Anaheim LP Ashford Santa Fe LP EX-23.1 6 d23137exv23w1.htm CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP exv23w1

 

EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-108335) pertaining to the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc., of our reports dated March 15, 2005, with respect to the consolidated and combined financial statements and schedule of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. and the Predecessor, Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. managements’ assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 15, 2005

 

EX-31.1 7 d23137exv31w1.htm CERTIFICATION OF CEO exv31w1
 

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Montgomery J. Bennett, certify that:

  1.   I have reviewed this annual report of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.;
 
  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
  4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

  5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 16, 2005

         
  /s/ MONTGOMERY J. BENNETT    
       
  Montgomery J. Bennett    
  Chief Executive Officer    

 

EX-31.2 8 d23137exv31w2.htm CERTIFICATION OF CFO exv31w2
 

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, David J. Kimichik, certify that:

  1.   I have reviewed this annual report of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.;
 
  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
  4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

  5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 16, 2005

         
  /s/ DAVID J. KIMICHIK    
       
  David J. Kimichik
Chief Financial Officer
   

 

EX-31.3 9 d23137exv31w3.htm CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER exv31w3
 

EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark L. Nunneley, certify that:

  1.   I have reviewed this annual report of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc.;
 
  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
  4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

  5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 16, 2005

         
  /s/ MARK L. NUNNELEY    
       
  Mark L. Nunneley
Chief Accounting Officer
   

 

EX-32.1 10 d23137exv32w1.htm CERTIFICATION OF CEO exv32w1
 

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Montgomery J. Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
  (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

         
Dated: March 16, 2005
  /s/ MONTGOMERY J. BENNETT    
       
  Montgomery J. Bennett    
  Chief Executive Officer    

 

EX-32.2 11 d23137exv32w2.htm CERTIFICATION OF CFO exv32w2
 

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David J. Kimichik, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
  (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

         
Dated: March 16, 2005
  /s/ DAVID J. KIMICHIK    
       
  David J. Kimichik    
  Chief Financial Officer    

 

EX-32.3 12 d23137exv32w3.htm CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER exv32w3
 

EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark L. Nunneley, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
  (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

         
Dated: March 16, 2005
  /s/ MARK L. NUNNELEY    
       
  Mark L. Nunneley    
  Chief Accounting Officer    

 

-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----