UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
or
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from           to

Commission File Number 001-31921

Compass Minerals International, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	36-3972986
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

9900 West 109th Street

Suite 600

Overland Park, KS 66210

(913) 344-9200

(Address of principal executive offices and telephone number)

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes: þ           No:     o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes: þ          No: o

          The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share, at July 28, 2005 was 31,570,342 shares.

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 (unaudited) and December 31, 2004		2
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, (unaudited)		3
	Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, (unaudited)		4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, (unaudited)		5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, (unaudited)		6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		14
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk		21
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		21
PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		22
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		23
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities		23
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		23
Item 5.	Other Information		23
Item 6.	Exhibits		23
SIGNATURES			24
Amendment No. 5 & Waiver to Amended/Restated Credit Agreement
Section 302 Certificates of Michael E. Ducey
Section 302 Certificates of Rodney L. Underdown
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

1

PART I.     FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions, except share data)

					June 30,			December 31,
					2005			2004
					(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents				$	55.5		$	9.7
	Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2.5 million in 2005 and $2.3 million in 2004					59.3			143.0
	Inventories					91.1			96.3
	Deferred income taxes, net					13.7			13.7
	Other					5.3			3.3
			Total current assets			224.9			266.0
	Property, plant and equipment, net					387.5			402.9
	Intangible assets, net					23.1			23.6
	Other					31.2			31.4
			Total assets		$	666.7		$	723.9
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
	Current portion of long-term debt				$	0.2		$	0.4
	Accounts payable					53.2			79.4
	Accrued expenses					10.2			14.8
	Accrued salaries and wages					14.9			19.3
	Income taxes payable					5.3			8.6
	Accrued interest					12.4			12.4
				Total current liabilities		96.2			134.9
Long-term debt, net of current portion						564.3			582.7
Deferred income taxes, net						46.3			55.1
Other noncurrent liabilities						41.3			39.6
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
	Common Stock:
		$0.01 par value, authorized shares — 200,000,000 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004; issued shares — 35,367,264 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004				0.4			0.4
		Additional paid in capital				0.6			0.2
		Treasury stock at cost — 3,859,691 at June 30, 2005 and 4,470,029 at December 31, 2004				(7.4	)		(8.5	)
		Accumulated deficit				(110.0	)		(118.8	)
		Accumulated other comprehensive income				35.0			38.3
		Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)				(81.4	)		(88.4	)
		Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)			$	666.7		$	723.9

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

2

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In millions, except share data)

		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
		2005			2004			2005		2004
		(Unaudited)
Sales		$	110.4		$	96.9		$	377.8	$	347.4
Cost of sales — shipping and handling			28.2			22.7			114.1		97.1
Cost of sales — products			60.7			54.1			168.9		158.2
	Gross profit		21.5			20.1			94.8		92.1
Selling, general and administrative expenses			13.1			12.6			29.1		27.0
Other charges			—			0.4			—		0.4
	Operating earnings		8.4			7.1			65.7		64.7
Other (income) expense:
	Interest expense		15.9			15.1			31.6		30.5
	Other, net		0.8			0.2			1.0		0.7
Earnings (loss) before income taxes			(8.3	)		(8.2	)		33.1		33.5
Income tax expense (benefit)			(7.6	)		(2.3	)		11.2		9.1
Net earnings (loss)		$	(0.7	)	$	(5.9	)	$	21.9	$	24.4
Net earnings (loss) per share, basic		$	(0.03	)	$	(0.19	)	$	0.70	$	0.80
Net earnings (loss) per share, diluted			(0.03	)		(0.19	)		0.68		0.76
Cash dividends per share, common			0.275			0.25			0.55		0.4375
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding			31,430,900			30,516,370			31,285,807		30,379,016
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding			31,430,900			30,516,370			31,966,910		32,200,707

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

3

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

For the six months ended June 30, 2005

(In millions)

													Accumulated
				Additional									Other
		Common		Paid In			Treasury			Accumulated			Comprehensive
		Stock		Capital			Stock			Deficit			Income			Total
		(Unaudited)
Balance, December 31, 2004		$	0.4	$	0.2		$	(8.5	)	$	(118.8	)	$	38.3		$	(88.4	)
Dividends on common stock					(4.1	)					(13.1	)					(17.2	)
Stock options exercised					4.3			1.1									5.4
Stock-based compensation					0.2												0.2
Comprehensive income:
	Net earnings										21.9						21.9
	Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges, net of tax													1.0			1.0
	Cumulative translation adjustments													(4.3	)		(4.3	)
	Comprehensive income																18.6
Balance, June 30, 2005		$	0.4	$	0.6		$	(7.4	)	$	(110.0	)	$	35.0		$	(81.4	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

4

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In millions)

				Six Months Ended
				June 30,
				2005			2004
				(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
	Net earnings			$	21.9		$	24.4
	Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash flows provided by operating activities:
		Depreciation, depletion and amortization			21.5			20.3
		Finance fee amortization			1.2			1.2
		Accreted interest			12.7			11.6
		Deferred income taxes			(3.9	)		(1.7	)
		Tax benefit from exercise of stock options			4.6			3.1
		(Gain) loss on disposal of property, plant & equipment			(0.5	)		0.1
		Other			0.3			0.5
		Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
			Receivables		82.2			62.4
			Inventories		4.2			13.6
			Other assets		(0.6	)		0.8
			Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(42.0	)		(27.6	)
			Other noncurrent liabilities		1.8			(0.3	)
		Net cash provided by operating activities			103.4			108.4
Cash flows from investing activities:
	Capital expenditures				(9.8	)		(8.6	)
	Other				(0.3	)		0.2
		Net cash used in investing activities			(10.1	)		(8.4	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
	Principal payments on long-term debt				(20.2	)		(20.4	)
	Revolver activity				(11.0	)		(14.0	)
	Dividends paid				(17.2	)		(13.3	)
	Proceeds from stock option exercises				0.9			0.8
	Deferred financing costs				—			(0.1	)
		Net cash used in financing activities			(47.5	)		(47.0	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents					—			(0.7	)
		Net increase in cash and cash equivalents			45.8			52.3
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period					9.7			2.6
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period				$	55.5		$	54.9
Supplemental cash flow information:
	Interest paid			$	17.5		$	18.0
	Income taxes paid, net of refunds				16.6			4.2

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

5

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Organization, Formation and Basis of Presentation:

      Compass Minerals International, Inc. (“CMI” or the “Company”), is a producer and marketer of inorganic mineral products with manufacturing sites in North America and Europe. Its principal products are salt and sulfate of potash (“SOP”). CMI serves a variety of markets, including agriculture, food processing, chemical processing, water conditioning and highway deicing. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CMI and its wholly owned subsidiary, Compass Minerals Group, Inc. (“CMG”), and the consolidated results of CMG’s wholly owned subsidiaries.

      The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation, have been included.

      The balance sheet at December 31, 2004 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2004 included in CMI’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 16, 2005.

      The Company experiences a substantial amount of seasonality in salt sales. The result of this seasonality is that sales and operating income are generally higher in the first and fourth quarters and lower during the second and third quarters of each year. In particular, sales of highway and consumer deicing salt products are seasonal as they vary based on the severity of the winter conditions in areas where the product is used. Following industry practice in North America, we stockpile sufficient quantities of deicing salt in the second, third and fourth quarters to meet the estimated requirements for the winter season. Due to the seasonal nature of the highway deicing product lines, operating results for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2005.

2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

      In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 151, “Inventory Costs — an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4,” that is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2006. This Statement amends the guidance in Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Paragraph 5 of ARB 43, Chapter 4, previously stated that “...under some circumstances, items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling costs may be so abnormal as to require treatment as current period charges ... .” This Statement requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal.” In addition, this Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The Company will determine the impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS No. 151 will have on its results of operations, cash flows or financial position prior to adoption.

      In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 109-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “AJCA”),” allowing companies additional time to evaluate the effect of the AJCA on plans for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings. The Company is in the process of evaluating the effects of the repatriation provision and expects to complete this evaluation during the last half of 2005.

6

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS 123(R) is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation,” and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (“APB 25”), “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Among other items SFAS 123(R) eliminates the use of APB 25 and the intrinsic value method of accounting, and requires companies to follow guidance previously set forth in SFAS 123, and recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments, based on the grant date fair value of those awards, in the financial statements. The Company adopted SFAS 123 in 2003. The effective date of SFAS 123(R) is the first annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005, which is the first quarter of 2006 for calendar year companies. The Company currently expects to adopt SFAS 123(R) in the first quarter of 2006 although early adoption is allowed. The adoption of SFAS 123(R) is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations or cash flows.

      In March 2005, the SEC staff issued additional guidance on SFAS 123(R) in the form of Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107. SAB 107 was issued to assist preparers by simplifying some of the implementation challenges of FAS 123(R) while enhancing the information that investors receive. SAB 107 creates a framework that is premised on two themes: (a) considerable judgment will be required by preparers to successfully implement FAS 123(R), specifically when valuing employee stock options; and (b) reasonable individuals, acting in good faith, may conclude differently on the fair value of employee stock options. Key topics covered by SAB 107 include: (a) valuation models — SAB 107 reinforces the flexibility allowed by FAS 123(R) to choose an option-pricing model that meets the standard’s fair value measurement objective; (b) expected volatility — the SAB provides guidance on when it would be appropriate to rely exclusively on either historical or implied volatility in estimating expected volatility; and (c) expected term — the new guidance includes examples and some simplified approaches to determining the expected term under certain circumstances. The Company will apply the principles of SAB 107 in conjunction with its adoption of SFAS 123(R).

      In March 2005, FASB issued FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations.” FIN 47 clarifies that the term Conditional Asset Retirement Obligation as used in FASB Statement No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligation,” refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. Accordingly, an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a Conditional Asset Retirement Obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The Company will determine the impact that the adoption of FIN 47 will have on its results of operations, cash flows or financial position during 2005.

3. Inventories:

      Inventories consist of the following (in millions):

	June 30,		December 31,
	2005		2004
Finished goods	$	77.8	$	83.4
Raw materials and supplies		13.3		12.9
	$	91.1	$	96.3

7

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

4. Property, Plant and Equipment, Net:

      Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following (in millions):

	June 30,			December 31,
	2005			2004
Land and buildings	$	142.8		$	143.6
Machinery and equipment		430.0			436.8
Furniture and fixtures		11.4			11.5
Mineral interests		178.8			180.1
Construction in progress		11.2			5.0
		774.2			777.0
Less accumulated depreciation and depletion		(386.7	)		(374.1	)
	$	387.5		$	402.9

5. Intangible Assets, Net:

      Intangible assets consist of rights to produce SOP and a customer list acquired in connection with the purchase of an SOP marketing business. The accumulated amortization of intangible assets at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 was $1.7 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Amortization expense during the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was $0.3 million and $0.3 million, and during the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively. Amortization expense for fiscal 2005 through fiscal 2009 is estimated to be approximately $1.1 million, annually.

6. Income Taxes:

      During the second quarter of 2005, the Internal Revenue Service and Canada Revenue Agency developed a framework to minimize the inconsistent treatment of tax matters involving the two taxing authorities. The event resulted in a change in certain tax estimates by management. Accordingly, in the second quarter of 2005, the Company reversed previously recorded income tax reserves of $5.9 million, partially offset by other income tax adjustments of $1.1 million, ($0.15 per basic and diluted common share) related to matters previously determined to have an uncertain outcome.

      In the first quarter of 2005, the Company repatriated funds from its U.K. subsidiary, through a one-time repayment of a portion of a pound-sterling-denominated loan to a U.S. subsidiary. The repayment resulted in a foreign exchange gain for tax purposes only, which is taxable in the U.S. and for which the Company recorded a $5.4 million charge to income tax expense. The previously unrealized foreign exchange gain was recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity in previous periods and does not appear in the consolidated statements of operations.

      Income tax benefit for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was $7.6 million and $2.3 million, respectively. Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was $11.2 million and $9.1 million, respectively. In addition to the specific tax items discussed above, the Company’s income tax provision differs from the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate primarily due to U.S. statutory depletion, state income taxes (net of federal tax benefit), foreign income tax rate differentials, foreign mining income taxes, non-deductible interest expense, and changes in the expected utilization of previously reserved net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”).

      At June 30, 2005, we had approximately $62.9 million of NOLs that expire between 2007 and 2022. The Company records valuation allowances for portions of its deferred tax asset relating to NOLs that it does not believe will, more likely than not, be realized. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company’s

8

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

valuation allowance was $7.1 million and $12.6 million, respectively. In the future, if the Company determines, based on the existence of sufficient evidence, that it should realize more or less of its deferred tax assets, an adjustment to any existing valuation allowance will be made in the period such determination is made.

7. Long-term Debt:

      Long-term debt consists of the following (in millions):

	June 30,			December 31,
	2005			2004
Senior Subordinated Notes	$	325.0		$	325.0
Senior Discount Notes		91.3			85.8
Senior Subordinated Discount Notes		128.1			120.9
Term Loan		17.6			37.7
Revolving Credit Facility		—			11.0
		562.0			580.4
Premium on Senior Subordinated Notes, net		2.5			2.7
Less: current portion		(0.2	)		(0.4	)
	$	564.3		$	582.7

8. Pension Plans:

      The components of net periodic benefit cost for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows (in millions):

	Three Months						Six Months
	Ended June 30,						Ended June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Service cost for benefits earned during the year	$	0.4		$	0.3		$	0.7		$	0.6
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		0.9			0.8			1.8			1.6
Return on plan assets		(0.9	)		(0.7	)		(1.8	)		(1.4	)
Net amortization and deferral		0.2			0.1			0.4			0.3
Net pension expense	$	0.6		$	0.5		$	1.1		$	1.1

      Employer contributions during the six months ended June 30, 2005 were approximately $0.9 million.

9. Commitments and Contingencies:

      The Company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types from normal Company activities.

      The Company has become aware of an aboriginal land claim filed by The Chippewas of Nawash and The Chippewas of Saugeen (the “Chippewas”) in the Ontario Superior Court against the Attorney General of Canada and Her Majesty The Queen In Right of Ontario. The Chippewas claim that a large part of the land under Lake Huron was never conveyed by treaty and therefore belongs to the Chippewas. The land claimed includes land in which the Company’s Goderich mine operates and has mining rights granted to it by the government of Ontario. The Company is not a party to this court action. Similar claims are pending with respect to other parts of the Great Lakes by other aboriginal claimants. The Company has been informed by the Ministry of the Attorney General of Ontario that “Canada takes the position that the common law does not recognize aboriginal title to the Great Lakes and its connecting waterways.”

9

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      The Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (“DATCP”) reportedly has information indicating that agricultural chemicals are present in the groundwater in the vicinity of the Kenosha, Wisconsin plant. DATCP has directed the Company to conduct an investigation into the possible presence of agricultural chemicals in soil and groundwater at the Kenosha plant. The Company has developed a plan which has been approved by DATCP to investigate soils and groundwater at the Kenosha site. Depending on the results of the investigation, remedial efforts may be necessary. Although little is currently known about the possible source of such contamination, or who should be responsible for it, the Company expects DATCP will again look to the Company to undertake those efforts. If required, the Company intends to conduct all phases of the investigation and any required remediation work under the Wisconsin Agricultural Chemical Cleanup Program, which will provide for reimbursement of some of the costs. None of the identified contaminants have been used in association with the Company’s site operations. The Company expects to seek participation by, or cost reimbursement from, other parties responsible for the presence of any agricultural chemicals found in soils at this site.

      The Company does not believe that these actions will result in a material adverse financial effect on the Company. Furthermore, while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, management presently believes that the outcome of each such proceeding or claim which is pending or known to be threatened, or all of them combined, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

10. Operating Segments:

      Segment information is as follows (in millions):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2005
	Salt		Potash		Other(a)			Total
Sales to external customers	$	83.1	$	27.3	$	—		$	110.4
Intersegment sales		—		2.8		(2.8	)		—
Cost of sales — shipping and handling costs		24.2		4.0		—			28.2
Operating earnings (loss)		4.8		9.0		(5.4	)		8.4
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		8.2		2.1		—			10.3
Total assets		496.6		133.6		36.5			666.7

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2004
	Salt		Potash		Other(a)			Total
Sales to external customers	$	74.3	$	22.6	$	—		$	96.9
Intersegment sales		—		2.5		(2.5	)		—
Cost of sales — shipping and handling costs		19.2		3.5		—			22.7
Operating earnings (loss)		6.3		6.2		(5.4	)		7.1
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		7.8		2.0		—			9.8
Total assets		492.8		133.0		20.9			646.7

10

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
	Salt		Potash		Other(a)			Total
Sales to external customers	$	325.7	$	52.1	$	—		$	377.8
Intersegment sales		—		4.8		(4.8	)		—
Cost of sales — shipping and handling costs		106.1		8.0		—			114.1
Operating earnings (loss)		63.3		14.1		(11.7	)		65.7
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		17.2		4.3		—			21.5

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
	Salt		Potash		Other(a)			Total
Sales to external customers	$	303.0	$	44.4	$	—		$	347.4
Intersegment sales		—		4.8		(4.8	)		—
Cost of sales — shipping and handling costs		89.9		7.2		—			97.1
Operating earnings (loss)		66.5		9.2		(11.0	)		64.7
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		16.3		4.0		—			20.3

(a) “Other” includes corporate entities and eliminations.

11. Stockholders’ Equity and Stock Options:

      On February 11, 2005, the board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.275 per share, or approximately $8.6 million, on its outstanding common stock. The dividend was paid on March 15, 2005 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 1, 2005.

      On May 9, 2005, the board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.275 per share, or approximately $8.6 million, on its outstanding common stock. The dividend was paid on June 15, 2005 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on June 1, 2005.

      During the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company reissued 610,187 shares of treasury stock related to the exercise of stock options from the Company’s 2001 Stock Option Plan and 151 shares related to the distribution of deferred stock units from the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. The Company recorded a tax benefit of $4.6 million from the exercise of stock options that was recorded as additional paid in capital.

11

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

12. Earnings per Share:

      The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (in millions, except for share and per share data):

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004			2005		2004
Numerator:
Net earnings (loss)	$	(0.7	)	$	(5.9	)	$	21.9	$	24.4
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		31,430,900			30,516,370			31,285,807		30,379,016
Shares for basic earnings per share		31,430,900			30,516,370			31,285,807		30,379,016
Stock options(a)		—			—			681,103		1,821,691
Shares for diluted earnings per share		31,430,900			30,516,370			31,966,910		32,200,707
Earnings (loss) per share, basic	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.19	)	$	0.70	$	0.80
Earnings (loss) per share, diluted	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.19	)	$	0.68	$	0.76

(a) For the calculation of diluted earnings per share, the Company uses the treasury stock method to determine the weighted average number of outstanding common shares.

      Options to purchase 1,030,133 and 1,669,156 shares of our common stock were outstanding at June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, but were not included in the computations of diluted earnings (loss) per share for each respective quarter because the options were anti-dilutive.

13. Other Comprehensive Income:

      The Company’s comprehensive income is comprised of net earnings, the change in the unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges related to the Company’s gas hedging activities and foreign currency translation adjustments. The components of comprehensive income are (in millions):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Net earnings (loss)	$	(0.7	)	$	(5.9	)	$	21.9		$	24.4
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, net of tax		(1.1	)		0.3			1.0			0.6
Cumulative translation adjustments		(3.0	)		(2.8	)		(4.3	)		(1.3	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(4.8	)	$	(8.4	)	$	18.6		$	23.7

      The following table provides additional detail related to amounts recorded in Other Comprehensive Income during the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 (in millions):

					Unrealized					Accumulated
		Unfunded			Gains on		Foreign			Other
		Pension			Cash Flow		Currency			Comprehensive
		Losses			Hedges		Adjustments			Income
Balance at December 31, 2004		$	(6.4	)	$	0.9	$	43.8		$	38.3
	2005 changes		—			1.0		(4.3	)		(3.3	)
Balance at June 30, 2005		$	(6.4	)	$	1.9	$	39.5		$	35.0

12

COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      The following table shows the pre-tax and after-tax amounts of other comprehensive income during the six months ended June 30, 2005 (in millions):

	Before
	Tax			Tax			Net-of-Tax
	Amount			Expense			Amount
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges	$	1.6		$	(0.6	)	$	1.0
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(4.3	)		—			(4.3	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(2.7	)	$	(0.6	)	$	(3.3	)

14. Subsequent Event:

      On August 4, 2005, the board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.275 per share, totaling approximately $8.7 million, on its outstanding common stock. The dividend is payable on September 15, 2005 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 1, 2005.

13

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

      All statements, other than statements of historical fact contained herein constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

      Forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: general business and economic conditions; governmental policies affecting the agricultural industry or highway maintenance programs in localities where the Company or its customers operate; weather conditions; the impact of competitive products; pressure on prices realized by the Company for its products; constraints on supplies of raw materials used in manufacturing certain of the Company’s products; capacity constraints limiting the production of certain products; difficulties or delays in the development, production, testing and marketing of products; difficulties or delays in receiving required governmental and regulatory approvals; market acceptance issues, including the failure of products to generate anticipated sales levels; the effects of and changes in trade, monetary, environmental and fiscal policies, laws and regulations; foreign exchange rates and fluctuations in those rates; the costs and effects of legal proceedings including environmental and administrative proceedings involving the Company; and other risk factors reported from time to time in the Company’s Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) reports.

      In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially.

      Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

      Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this quarterly report to the “Company,” “Compass,” “Compass Minerals,” “CMI,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Compass Minerals International, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Critical Accounting Estimates

      Preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Management believes the most complex and sensitive judgements, because of their significance to our consolidated financial statements, result primarily from the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 16, 2005, describe the significant accounting estimates and policies used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Actual results in these areas could differ from management’s estimates. Except as disclosed in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, there have been no significant changes in our critical accounting estimates during the first six months of 2005.

14

Results of Operations

      The consolidated financial statements have been prepared to present the historical financial condition and results of operations and cash flows for the Company. The following tables and discussion should be read in conjunction with the information contained in our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this quarterly report.

	Three Months
	Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2005			2004			2005		2004
	(Dollars in millions, except per ton data)
Sales	$	110.4		$	96.9		$	377.8	$	347.4
Cost of sales — shipping and handling		28.2			22.7			114.1		97.1
Cost of sales — products		60.7			54.1			168.9		158.2
Gross profit		21.5			20.1			94.8		92.1
Selling, general and administrative expenses		13.1			12.6			29.1		27.0
Other charges		—			0.4			—		0.4
Operating earnings		8.4			7.1			65.7		64.7
Interest expense		15.9			15.1			31.6		30.5
Other (income) expense, net		0.8			0.2			1.0		0.7
Earnings (loss) before income taxes		(8.3	)		(8.2	)		33.1		33.5
Income tax expense (benefit)		(7.6	)		(2.3	)		11.2		9.1
Net earnings (loss)	$	(0.7	)	$	(5.9	)	$	21.9	$	24.4
Sales by Segment:
Salt	$	83.1		$	74.3		$	325.7	$	303.0
Specialty potash fertilizers		27.3			22.6			52.1		44.4
Total	$	110.4		$	96.9		$	377.8	$	347.4
Sales Volumes (in thousands of tons):
Highway deicing		963			846			5,824		5,525
General trade		660			630			1,425		1,415
Specialty potash		104			99			208		200
Average Sales Price (per ton):
Highway deicing	$	23.30		$	21.92		$	32.47	$	30.88
General trade		91.93			88.50			95.91		93.58
Specialty potash		260.89			228.41			250.13		219.64

Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2004

Sales

      Sales for the second quarter of 2005 of $110.4 million increased $13.5 million, or 14% compared to $96.9 million for the second quarter of 2004. Sales include revenues from the sale of our products, or “Product Sales,” as well as shipping and handling costs incurred to deliver salt and sulfate of potash (“SOP”) products to the customer. Such shipping and handling costs were $28.2 million during the second quarter of 2005, an increase of $5.5 million compared to the second quarter of 2004. The increase in shipping and handling-related costs for the second quarter of 2005 is due to the increased volume of products sold as compared to 2004, combined with higher shipping costs. The higher shipping costs are also reflective of higher fuel costs and increases in transportation rates.

15

      Product Sales for the second quarter of 2005 of $82.2 million increased $8.0 million, or 11% compared to $74.2 million for the same period in 2004. Salt Product Sales for the second quarter of 2005 of $58.9 million increased $3.8 million, or 7% compared to $55.1 million for the same period in 2004 due to increased sales volumes in our North American highway deicing and general trade product lines of approximately $1.9 million and $1.3 million, respectively, and increased average prices for those same product lines of approximately $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The increased sales volumes in our North American highway deicing product lines of approximately 130,000 tons was primarily due to advance shipments of highway deicing salt for the 2005/2006 winter season in North America. The increase in volumes in our North American general trade product line is primarily due to higher water conditioning and industrial sales volumes. The increase in average prices is primarily the combined result of price increases related to the 2004/2005 highway deicing season in North America and improved prices in the North American general trade business line related to previously announced price increases. Also affecting Product Sales was approximately $1.3 million of favorable impact from the effect of a weakened U.S. dollar against both the Canadian dollar and the British pound. Partially offsetting these increases were lower pricing and volumes in our U.K. general trade product line of approximately $1.3 million.

      Specialty potash fertilizer Product Sales for the second quarter of 2005 of $23.3 million increased $4.2 million, or 21% compared to $19.1 million for the same period in 2004 primarily reflecting the impact of previously announced price increases and modest growth in sales volumes.

Gross Profit

      Gross profit for the second quarter of 2005 of $21.5 million increased $1.4 million, or 7% compared to $20.1 million for the same period in 2004. The increase in gross profit is primarily due to improved sales prices net of costs to distribute products ($3.9 million), increases in highway deicing and specialty potash fertilizer volumes ($0.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively), and changes in foreign exchange rates as described above ($0.3 million). Partially offsetting these improvements were lower margins in our general trade product lines due to a change in product mix of approximately $1.2 million and higher production costs of approximately $2.6 million related to increases in natural gas, maintenance and other production materials in excess of efficiencies gained through higher production volumes.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

      Selling, general and administrative expenses for the second quarter of 2005 of $13.1 million increased $0.5 million, or 4% compared to $12.6 million for the same period in 2004. The increase primarily reflects higher costs in terms of U.S. dollars due to changes in foreign exchange rates.

Interest Expense

      Interest expense for the second quarter of 2005 of $15.9 million increased $0.8 million compared to $15.1 million for the same period in 2004. This increase is primarily the result of higher principal balances of the senior discount notes and senior subordinated discount notes due to interest accretion (see Note 8 to the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2004 included in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 16, 2005). Partially offsetting this increase is a reduction in interest expense resulting from the payments made on our term loan.

Other (Income) Expense, Net

      Other expense, net of $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 increased $0.6 million compared to $0.2 million for the same period in 2004 primarily reflecting higher foreign currency exchange losses partially offset by increased interest income related to cash and cash equivalents.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

      Income tax benefit for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $7.6 million compared to an income tax benefit of $2.3 million for the same period of 2004, an increased benefit of $5.3 million. As discussed in Note 6

16

to the consolidated financial statements, during the second quarter of 2005 we reversed previously recorded income tax reserves of $5.9 million, partially offset by other income tax adjustments of $1.1 million, ($0.15 per basic and diluted common share) related to matters previously determined to have an uncertain outcome upon clarification of such matters by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Canada Revenue Agency.

      In addition to the specific tax items discussed above, the increased tax benefit reflects an increase in our effective tax rate primarily due to changes in the amount of permanent deductions. Our income tax provision differs from the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate primarily due to U.S. statutory depletion, state income taxes (net of federal tax benefit), foreign income tax rate differentials, foreign mining income taxes, nondeductible interest expense, and changes in the expected utilization of previously reserved NOLs.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004

Sales

      Sales for the six months ended June 30, 2005 of $377.8 million increased $30.4 million, or 9% compared to $347.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Sales include revenues from the sale of our products, or “Product Sales,” as well as shipping and handling costs incurred to deliver salt and SOP products to the customer. Such shipping and handling costs were $114.1 million during six months of 2005, an increase of $17.0 million compared to $97.1 million for the same 2004 period. The increase in shipping and handling-related costs for 2005 is due to the increased volume of products sold as compared to 2004, combined with higher shipping costs. The higher shipping costs are also reflective of higher fuel costs and increases in transportation rates.

      Product Sales for the six months ended June 30, 2005 of $263.7 million increased $13.4 million, or 5% compared to $250.3 million for the same period in 2004. Salt Product Sales for the six months of 2005 of $219.6 million increased $6.5 million, or 3% compared to $213.1 million for the same period in 2004, while sales of specialty potash fertilizer products of $44.1 million increased $6.9 million, or 19% compared to $37.2 million for the same period in 2004.

      Salt Product Sales for six months of 2005 increased compared to 2004 primarily reflecting increased average sales prices of approximately $1.8 million and a favorable impact of approximately $5.9 million from the effect of a weakened U.S. dollar against both the Canadian dollar and the British pound, partially offset by a net decrease due to a change in product mix of approximately $0.7 million. The increase in average prices is primarily the combined result of price increases related to the 2004/2005 winter season for the highway deicing product line in North America and improved prices in the North American general trade business line related to previously announced price increases. The net decrease due to product mix in our general trade product lines of approximately $3.8 million was partially offset by improved volumes from our highway deicing product lines of approximately $3.1 million. The general trade product lines primarily reflect lower consumer deicing sales in North America and the U.K. and a decrease in industrial sales volumes in the U.K., while the improved highway deicing volumes reflect higher sales for the 2004/2005 winter season compared to the prior year due to winter weather that was moderately more severe than normal and advance sales for the 2005/2006 winter season in North America.

      Specialty potash fertilizer Product Sales for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased over the same period in 2004 primarily reflecting the impact of previously announced price increases and modest growth in sales volumes.

Gross Profit

      Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2005 of $94.8 million increased $2.7 million, or 3% compared to $92.1 million for the same period in 2004. The increase in gross profit is primarily due to improved sales prices net of costs to distribute products ($4.6 million), increases in highway deicing and specialty potash fertilizer volumes ($1.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively), and changes in foreign exchange rates as described above ($2.6 million). Partially offsetting these improvements were lower general trade margins due to

17

changes in product mix ($4.8 million) and higher production costs ($1.4 million) related to increases in natural gas and other production materials in excess of efficiencies gained through higher production volumes.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

      Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2005 of $29.1 million increased $2.1 million, or 8% compared to $27.0 million for the same period in 2004. The increase primarily reflects additional compensation and benefit costs ($0.5 million), higher costs for professional services and compliance with the Sarbanes Oxley Act ($0.8 million) and higher costs in terms of U.S. dollars due to changes in foreign exchange rates ($0.8 million).

Interest Expense

      Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 of $31.6 million increased $1.1 million compared to $30.5 million for the same period in 2004. This increase is primarily the result of higher principal balances of the senior discount notes and senior subordinated discount notes due to interest accretion (see Note 8 to the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2004 included in CMI’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 16, 2005). Partially offsetting this increase is a reduction in interest expense resulting from the payments made on our term loan.

Other (Income) Expense, Net

      Other expense, net of $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, increased $0.3 million compared to $0.7 million for the same period in 2004 primarily reflecting higher foreign currency exchange losses partially offset by increased interest income related to cash and cash equivalents.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

      In the first quarter of 2005, we repatriated funds from our U.K. subsidiary through a one-time repayment of a portion of a pound-sterling-denominated loan to Compass Minerals Group (CMG), our wholly owned subsidiary. The repayment resulted in a previously unrealized foreign exchange gain for tax purposes only, which is taxable in the U.S. and for which we recorded a $5.4 million charge to income tax expense. The previously unrealized foreign exchange gain was recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity in previous periods and does not appear in the consolidated statement of operations.

      As discussed in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, during the second quarter of 2005 we reversed previously recorded income tax reserves of $5.9 million, partially offset by other income tax adjustments of $1.1 million, ($0.15 per basic and diluted common share) related to matters previously determined to have an uncertain outcome upon clarification of such matters by the IRS and Canada Revenue Agency.

      Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was $11.2 million and $9.1 million, respectively. The increase, exclusive of the specific tax items discussed above, was $1.5 million due to an increase in our effective tax rate primarily due to changes in the amount of permanent deductions. Our income tax provision differs from the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate primarily due to U.S. statutory depletion, state income taxes (net of federal tax benefit), foreign income tax rate differentials, foreign mining income taxes, nondeductible interest expense, and changes in the expected utilization of previously reserved NOLs.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      Historically, we have used cash generated from operations to meet our working capital needs and to fund capital expenditures. Our primary sources of liquidity will continue to be cash flow from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. We expect that ongoing requirements for debt service and capital expenditures will be funded from these sources. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.

      As of June 30, 2005, we had $562.0 million of principal indebtedness, net of issuance premium, consisting of $325.0 million of senior subordinated notes at CMG, $91.3 million of senior discount notes with a face value

18

of $123.5 million, $128.1 million of senior subordinated discount notes with a face value of $179.6 million, and a $17.6 million term loan. Our revolving credit facility provides borrowing capacity up to an aggregate amount of $135.0 million. As of June 30, 2005, no indebtedness was outstanding under our revolving credit facility and $7.7 million of letters of credit were outstanding, leaving approximately $127.3 million available under our revolving credit facility. Future borrowings under our revolving credit facility will be available to fund our working capital requirements, capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes.

      During the six months ended June 30, 2005, cash flows from operations were $103.4 million. We used a portion of those cash flows to pay down $11.0 million of our revolving credit facility that was outstanding as of December 31, 2004, to pay $17.2 million of dividends to the holders of our common stock, and to make $20.0 million of voluntary principal payments on our term loan. As of June 30, 2005, we had cash and cash equivalents on hand of $55.5 million.

      Our significant debt service obligations could, under certain circumstances, materially affect our financial condition and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under the senior subordinated notes of CMG, revolving credit facility, senior discount notes and senior subordinated discount notes. As of June 30, 2005, we are in compliance with all conditions and covenants related to the senior credit facility, senior subordinated notes, senior discount notes and senior subordinated discount notes.

      Although our operations are conducted through our subsidiaries, none of our subsidiaries are obligated to make funds available to us for payment on our indebtedness or to pay dividends on our capital stock. Accordingly, our ability to make payments on our indebtedness and distribute dividends to our stockholders is dependent on the earnings and the distribution of funds from our subsidiaries. The terms of our senior credit facilities and the indenture governing the senior subordinated notes of CMG significantly restrict our subsidiaries from paying dividends and otherwise transferring assets to us. Furthermore, our subsidiaries will be permitted under the terms of our senior credit facilities and other indebtedness to incur additional indebtedness that may severely restrict or prohibit the making of distributions, the payment of dividends or the making of loans by our subsidiaries to us. The terms of our senior credit facilities also restrict our subsidiaries from paying dividends to us in order to fund cash interest on our senior discount notes and subordinated discount notes if we do not maintain an adjusted senior leverage ratio (as defined in our Credit Agreement dated November 28, 2001, as amended) of 4.5 or less (as of June 30, 2005) or if a default or event of default has occurred and is continuing under our senior credit facilities. As of June 30, 2005, our adjusted senior indebtedness leverage ratio (as defined in the terms of our senior credit facility) was 1.7. We cannot assure you that we will maintain this ratio. This ratio is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled ratios of other companies due to inconsistencies in the method of calculation and we encourage you to read our amended and restated credit agreement, as amended, contained in the exhibits to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 16, 2005 and in this Form 10-Q.

      We cannot assure you that the agreements governing the current and future indebtedness of our subsidiaries will permit our subsidiaries to provide us with sufficient dividends, distributions or loans to fund scheduled interest and principal payments on our indebtedness when due. If we consummate an acquisition, our debt service requirements could increase. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004

      Net cash flow provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was $103.4 million and $108.4 million, respectively. Of these amounts, $30.5 million and $48.4 million for 2005 and 2004, respectively, were generated by working capital reductions. The primary working capital reductions for 2005 and 2004 were decreases in receivables of $82.2 million and $62.4 million, respectively, and decreases in inventories of $4.2 million and $13.6 million, respectively. These reductions were partially offset by decreases in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $42.0 million and $27.6 million, respectively. These reductions are indicative of the seasonal nature of highway deicing product line sales.

19

      Net cash flow used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, were $10.1 million and $8.4 million, respectively. The 2005 capital expenditures were primarily for routine replacements at our facilities and cost reduction projects at our North American evaporated salt and specialty potash fertilizer facilities.

      Net cash flow used in financing activities was $47.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, primarily due to $20.0 million of voluntary principal repayments that reduced the amount of long-term debt outstanding under our term loan credit facility, a $11.0 million pay down of our revolving credit facility, and $17.2 million of dividends paid. Net cash flow used in financing activities was $47.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, primarily due to a $20.0 million voluntary principal repayment that reduced the amount of long-term debt outstanding under our term loan credit facility, a $14.0 million pay down of our revolving credit facility, and $13.3 million of dividends paid. No gain or loss was recorded upon repayment of debt.

Effects of Currency Fluctuations and Inflation

      We conduct operations in Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States. Therefore, our results of operations are subject to both currency transaction risk and currency translation risk. We incur currency transaction risk whenever we or one of our subsidiaries enter into either a purchase or sales transaction using a currency other than the local currency of the transacting entity. With respect to currency translation risk, our financial condition and results of operations are measured and recorded in the relevant local currency and then translated into U.S. dollars for inclusion in our historical consolidated financial statements. Exchange rates between these currencies and U.S. dollars in recent years have fluctuated significantly and may do so in the future. The majority of our revenues and costs are denominated in U.S. dollars, with pounds sterling and Canadian dollars also being significant. The weakened U.S. dollar against the pound sterling and Canadian dollar has had a positive impact on our reported consolidated sales. However, significant changes in the value of the Canadian dollar, the euro or pound sterling relative to the U.S. dollar could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and our ability to meet interest and principal payments on U.S. dollar denominated debt, including borrowings under our senior credit facilities.

Seasonality

      We experience a substantial amount of seasonality in salt sales. The result of this seasonality is that sales and operating income are generally higher in the first and fourth quarters and lower during the second and third quarters of each year. In particular, sales of highway and consumer deicing salt products are seasonal as they vary based on the severity of the winter conditions in areas where the product is used. Following industry practice in North America, we stockpile sufficient quantities of deicing salt in the second, third and fourth quarters to meet the estimated requirements for the winter season.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

      In November 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 151, “Inventory Costs — an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4” that is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of 2006. This Statement amends the guidance in Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Paragraph 5 of ARB 43, Chapter 4, previously stated that “...under some circumstances, items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling costs may be so abnormal as to require treatment as current period charges ... .” This Statement requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal.” In addition, this Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. We will determine the impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS No. 151 will have on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position prior to adoption.

      In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 109-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the

20

“AJCA”),” allowing companies additional time to evaluate the effect of the AJCA on plans for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings. We are in the process of evaluating the effects of the repatriation provision and expect to complete this evaluation during the last half of 2005.

      In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS 123(R) is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (“APB 25”), “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Among other items SFAS 123(R) eliminates the use of APB 25 and the intrinsic value method of accounting, and requires companies to follow guidance previously set forth in SFAS 123, and recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments, based on the grant date fair value of those awards, in the financial statements. We adopted SFAS 123 in 2003. The effective date of SFAS 123(R) is the first annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005, which is the first quarter of 2006 for calendar year companies. We currently expect to adopt SFAS 123(R) in the first quarter of 2006 although early adoption is allowed. The adoption of SFAS 123(R) is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated statements of operations or cash flows.

      In March 2005, the SEC staff issued additional guidance on SFAS 123(R) in the form of Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107. SAB 107 was issued to assist preparers by simplifying some of the implementation challenges of FAS 123(R) while enhancing the information that investors receive. SAB 107 creates a framework that is premised on two themes: (a) considerable judgment will be required by preparers to successfully implement FAS 123(R), specifically when valuing employee stock options; and (b) reasonable individuals, acting in good faith, may conclude differently on the fair value of employee stock options. Key topics covered by SAB 107 include: (a) valuation models — SAB 107 reinforces the flexibility allowed by FAS 123(R) to choose an option-pricing model that meets the standard’s fair value measurement objective; (b) expected volatility — the SAB provides guidance on when it would be appropriate to rely exclusively on either historical or implied volatility in estimating expected volatility; and (c) expected term — the new guidance includes examples and some simplified approaches to determining the expected term under certain circumstances. We will apply the principles of SAB 107 in conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 123(R).

      In March 2005, FASB issued FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations.” FIN 47 clarifies that the term “Conditional Asset Retirement Obligation” as used in FASB Statement No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligation,” refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. Accordingly, an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of a Conditional Asset Retirement Obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. We will determine the impact that the adoption of FIN 47 will have on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position during 2005.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

      Our business is subject to various types of market risks that include, but are not limited to, interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk and commodity pricing risk. In the future, management may take actions that would mitigate our exposure to these types of risks including entering into forward purchase contracts and derivative instruments. However, there can be no assurance that our hedging activities will eliminate or substantially reduce risks associated with these risks. We will not enter into any financial instrument arrangements for speculative purposes. The Company’s market risk exposure related to these items has not changed materially since December 31, 2004.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

      As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO determined that the Company’s

21

disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2005 at the reasonable assurance level, because of the material weakness described below.

      Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

      A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had determined that it did not maintain effective controls over the valuation and completeness of its income taxes payable, deferred income tax assets and liabilities (including the associated valuation allowance) and the income tax provision because it did not have accounting personnel with sufficient knowledge of generally accepted accounting principles related to income tax accounting and reporting. Specifically, the Company’s processes, procedures and controls related to the preparation and review of the liability for income taxes payable were not effective to ensure that the additions to the liability were complete and accurate. Also, the Company did not have effective controls over the preparation and review of the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets. Additionally, this control deficiency could result in a misstatement to the aforementioned accounts that would result in a material misstatement to annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, management determined that this control deficiency constituted a material weakness. Because of this material weakness, the Company concluded that it did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. At June 30, 2005, the Company determined that the material weakness had not been remediated.

      In order to remediate this matter, the Company identified and is implementing actions to improve the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting related to its income tax accounting. In connection with this effort, the Company has implemented a standardized tax accounting software package to assist in the SFAS No. 109 accounting process, implemented greater senior level financial officer review of the income tax balance sheet accounts and the related journal entries, and engaged a third party specialist to assist the Company’s personnel by conducting comprehensive and detailed reviews of the Company’s tax reporting and accounting, in particular with respect to developing more effective processes for establishing and monitoring deferred income taxes, valuation allowances and the Company’s annual effective tax rate. The Company continues to adopt more rigorous policies and procedures with respect to the income tax account balance sheet review process, including the income taxes payable and deferred tax asset valuation allowance accounts, and plans to strengthen the resources in the income tax accounting function.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

      Except as otherwise discussed herein, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II.     OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

      The Company from time to time is involved in various routine legal proceedings. These primarily involve commercial claims, product liability claims, personal injury claims and workers’ compensation claims. We cannot predict the outcome of these lawsuits, legal proceedings and claims with certainty. Nevertheless, we believe that the outcome of these proceedings, even if determined adversely, would not have a material adverse

22

effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, in connection with the recapitalization, IMC Global, Inc. has agreed to indemnify us against certain legal matters. There have been no material developments during 2005 with respect to other legal proceedings.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

      None

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

      None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

      None

Item 5. Other Information

      Not Applicable

Item 6. Exhibits

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
No.			Description of Exhibit
	10	.1*	Amendment No. 5 and Waiver to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated July 20, 2005, among Compass Minerals International, Inc., Compass Minerals Group, Inc., as U.S. borrower, Sifto Canada Inc., as Canadian borrower, Salt Union Limited, as U.K. borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, as administrative agent, J.P. Morgan Bank Canada, as Canadian agent, and J.P. Morgan Europe Limited, as U.K. agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Compass Minerals’ Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-110250).
	31	.1*	Section 302 Certifications of Michael E. Ducey, President and Chief Executive Officer.
	31	.2*	Section 302 Certifications of Rodney L. Underdown, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President.
	32*		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350 of Michael E. Ducey, President and Chief Executive Officer and Rodney L. Underdown, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President.

*  Filed herewith

23

SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Compass Minerals International, Inc.

/s/ Michael E. Ducey

Michael E. Ducey

President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 5, 2005

/s/ Rodney L. Underdown

Rodney L. Underdown

Chief Financial Officer and Vice President

Date: August 5, 2005

24