LITIGATION AND OTHER LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

LITIGATION AND OTHER LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

LITIGATION AND OTHER LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Legal Proceedings

The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various legal actions in the normal course of business, in which claims for compensatory and punitive damages are asserted, some for substantial amounts.  We recognize an estimated loss from these loss contingencies when we believe it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Some of the pending matters have been filed as purported class actions and some actions have been filed in certain jurisdictions that permit punitive damage awards that are disproportionate to the actual damages incurred.  The amounts sought in certain of these actions are often large or indeterminate and the ultimate outcome of certain actions is difficult to predict.  In the event of an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters, there is a possibility that the ultimate liability may be in excess of the liabilities we have established and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.  In addition, the resolution of pending or future litigation may involve modifications to the terms of outstanding insurance policies or could impact the timing and amount of rate increases, which could adversely affect

the future profitability of the related insurance policies.  Based upon information presently available, and in light of legal, factual and other defenses available to the Company and its subsidiaries, the Company does not believe that it is probable that the ultimate liability from either pending or threatened legal actions, after consideration of existing loss provisions, will have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial condition, operating results or cash flows. However, given the inherent difficulty in predicting the outcome of legal proceedings, there exists the possibility that such legal actions could have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial condition, operating results or cash flows.

In addition to the inherent difficulty of predicting litigation outcomes, particularly those that will be decided by a jury, some matters purport to seek substantial or an unspecified amount of damages for unsubstantiated conduct spanning several years based on complex legal theories and damages models. The alleged damages typically are indeterminate or not factually supported in the complaint, and, in any event, the Company's experience indicates that monetary demands for damages often bear little relation to the ultimate loss. In some cases, plaintiffs are seeking to certify classes in the litigation and class certification either has been denied or is pending and we have filed oppositions to class certification or sought to decertify a prior class certification. In addition, for many of these cases: (i) there is uncertainty as to the outcome of pending appeals or motions; (ii) there are significant factual issues to be resolved; and/or (iii) there are novel legal issues presented. Accordingly, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss in excess of amounts accrued, if any, or predict the timing of the eventual resolution of these matters.  The Company reviews these matters on an ongoing basis.  When assessing reasonably possible and probable outcomes, the Company bases its assessment on the expected ultimate outcome following all appeals.

On December 19, 2018, Melanie Cyganowski, as Equity Receiver for Platinum Partners Credit Opportunities Master Fund, LP ("PPCO") and other Platinum entities (the "PPCO Receiver") brought an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Cyganowski v. Beechwood Re Ltd, et al., alleging, among other claims, fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, fraudulent transfer and violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act against numerous defendants, including Beechwood Re Ltd. ("BRe") and many of its affiliates and CNO Financial Group, Inc., Bankers Conseco Life Insurance Company ("BCLIC"), Washington National and 40|86 Advisors, Inc. (collectively, the "CNO Parties"). The PPCO Receiver alleged that Platinum insiders conspired with BRe and its principals and affiliates in a massive fraudulent scheme to enrich the Platinum and BRe insiders to the detriment of Platinum investors and creditors. The PPCO Receiver alleged that CNO Financial Group, Inc., BCLIC, Washington National and 40|86 Advisors, Inc. had liability for the fraudulent scheme of the Platinum and BRe insiders under a theory that they turned a blind eye to the fraudulent scheme due to their desire to transfer unprofitable legacy portfolios of long-term care insurance via the reinsurance transactions with BRe. On January 24, 2019, the court consolidated the PPCO Receiver action with two other cases (to which the CNO companies are not parties) before it for at least discovery purposes.  On August 19, 2019, the court granted in their entirety CNO Financial Group, Inc.’s and 40|86 Advisors, Inc.’s motions to dismiss the PPCO Receiver’s claims against them. The court granted in part and denied in part the motions to dismiss of BCLIC and Washington National, dismissing the PPCO Receiver’s claims for, among other things, fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, securities fraud and violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, while denying BCLIC’s and Washington National’s motions to dismiss the PPCO Receiver’s fraudulent transfer and unjust enrichment claims. BCLIC and Washington National agreed with the PPCO Receiver to fully settle the Cyganowski case. Under the settlement, neither BCLIC nor Washington National will incur any liability or make any payment to anyone, but instead they were granted an unsecured claim against PPCO’s estate. The settlement agreement states that the PPCO Receiver’s decision to enter into the agreement was based in part on the CNO Parties’ credible arguments based on an expansive documentary record that the CNO Parties were not knowing participants in any fraud perpetrated by any of the Platinum funds or any of the Beechwood entities, but were instead purely victims of such fraud schemes. The settlement agreement was approved by the court, and the PPCO Receiver and all CNO Parties have filed a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice that was accepted by the Court. The Cyganowski case is thus completely concluded.

On April 9, 2019, BCLIC and Washington National commenced an action entitled Bankers Conseco Life Insurance Company and Washington National Insurance Company v. Wilmington Trust, National Association, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Commercial Division (the "Wilmington Action").  In the Wilmington Action, BCLIC and Washington National assert claims against Wilmington Trust, National Association ("Wilmington") for breaching its express contractual obligations under four trust agreements pursuant to which Wilmington was the trustee in regard to trust assets ceded as part of reinsurance agreements with BRe, as well as for breaching its fiduciary duties to BCLIC and Washington National. The Court granted Wilmington’s motion to dismiss this litigation. BCLIC and Washington National are appealing the Court’s decision.

On June 7, 2019, the Joint Official Liquidators of Platinum Partners Value Arbitrage Fund L.P. (in Official Liquidation) and Principal Growth Strategies, LLC, commenced suit against, among others, the CNO Parties in Delaware Chancery Court.  Plaintiffs allege that the CNO Parties were unjustly enriched when they terminated BCLIC and Washington National's reinsurance agreements with BRe and recaptured assets from reinsurance trusts, in particular, Agera securities.  Plaintiffs contend that the Agera securities were fraudulently transferred to the Reinsurance Trusts by other Platinum-related entities and they are seeking to claw back those Agera securities, or the value of those assets, from the CNO Parties.  The CNO Parties are vigorously contesting the plaintiff’s claims. The CNO Parties had removed the case to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware but on April 6, 2020, the District Court granted the plaintiff's motion to remand the case back to the Delaware Chancery Court. The Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint and the CNO Parties will respond.

On June 28, 2019, BCLIC and Washington National commenced an action entitled Bankers Conseco Life Insurance Company and Washington National Insurance Company v. KPMG LLP, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Commercial Division (the "KPMG Action").  In the KPMG Action, BCLIC and Washington National assert claims against KPMG LLP ("KPMG") for aiding and abetting fraud, constructive fraud and negligent misrepresentation arising from KPMG's alleged role in the Platinum Partners' scheme to defraud BCLIC and Washington National into reinsuring its long-term care business with BRe. The Court granted KPMG’s motion to dismiss this litigation. BCLIC and Washington

National are appealing the Court’s decision.

Regulatory Examinations and Fines

Insurance companies face significant risks related to regulatory investigations and actions.  Regulatory investigations generally result from matters related to sales or underwriting practices, payment of contingent or other sales commissions, claim payments and procedures, product design, product disclosure, additional premium charges for premiums paid on a periodic basis, denial or delay of benefits, charging excessive or impermissible fees on products, procedures related to canceling policies, changing the way cost of insurance charges are calculated for certain life insurance products or recommending unsuitable products to customers.  We are, in the ordinary course of our business, subject to various examinations, inquiries and information requests from state, federal and other authorities.  The ultimate outcome of these regulatory actions (including the costs of complying with information requests and policy reviews) cannot be predicted with certainty.  In the event of an unfavorable outcome in one or more of these matters, the ultimate liability may be in excess of liabilities we have established and we could suffer significant reputational harm as a result of these matters, which could also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In August 2011, we were notified of an examination to be done on behalf of a number of states for the purpose of determining compliance with unclaimed property laws by the Company and its subsidiaries.  Such examination has included inquiries related to the use of data available on the U.S. Social Security Administration's Death Master File ("SSADMF") to identify instances where benefits under life insurance policies, annuities and retained asset accounts are payable. We are continuing to provide information to the examiners in response to their requests. A total of 41 states and the District of Columbia participated in this examination. In November 2018, we entered into a Global Resolution Agreement for compliance with laws and regulations concerning the identification, reporting and escheatment of unclaimed contract benefits or abandoned funds. Under the terms of the Global Resolution Agreement, a third-party auditor acting on behalf of the signatory jurisdictions is comparing expanded matching criteria to the SSADMF to identify deceased insureds and contract holders where a valid claim has not been made.