form10qsb.htm

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Performance Capital Management, LLC as of September 30, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated statements of members’ equity and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. All information included in these consolidated financial statements is the representation of the management of Performance Capital Management, LLC.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Performance Capital Management, LLC as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, members’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006 (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 22, 2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

	September 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
	(unaudited)
ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents	$	331,386	$	689,888
Restricted cash		518,433		491,400
Other receivables		30,141		28,984
Advance on loan portfolio purchase		410,811		-
Purchased loan portfolios, net		3,687,935		5,000,942
Property and equipment, net		389,043		430,119
Deposits		38,090		80,463
Prepaid expenses and other assets		95,950		100,274

Total assets	$	5,501,789	$	6,822,070



LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY

LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	120,648	$	165,996
Accrued liabilities		623,316		423,367
Accrued interest		39,380		46,040
Notes payable		3,937,988		4,455,460
Income taxes payable		12,000		27,580
Total liabilities		4,733,332		5,118,443

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES		-		-

MEMBERS' EQUITY		768,457		1,703,627

Total liabilities and members' equity	$	5,501,789	$	6,822,070

	For the quarter ended September 30, 2007			For the quarter ended September 30, 2006			For the nine months ended September 30, 2007			For the nine months ended September 30, 2006
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)
REVENUES:

Portfolio collection, net	$	1,889,294		$	1,530,548		$	5,498,801		$	5,243,651
Portfolio sales, net		-			20,000			14,789			551,728

TOTAL NET REVENUES		1,889,294			1,550,548			5,513,590			5,795,379

OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Salaries and benefits		994,094			1,021,897			3,155,046			3,214,974
General and administrative		807,217			695,382			2,312,240			2,205,027
Depreciation		24,954			27,456			74,649			79,934
Total operating costs and expenses		1,826,265			1,744,735			5,541,935			5,499,935

INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS		63,029			(194,187	)		(28,345	)		295,444

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Interest expense and other financing costs		(160,794	)		(219,178	)		(448,275	)		(629,439	)
Interest income		1,066			5,508			9,922			12,101
Other income		17,571			-			28,064			-
Total other expense, net		(142,157	)		(213,670	)		(410,289	)		(617,338	)

LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION		(79,128	)		(407,857	)		(438,634	)		(321,894	)

INCOME TAX PROVISION		-			2,790			13,600			29,180

NET LOSS	$	(79,128	)	$	(410,647	)	$	(452,234	)	$	(351,074	)

NET LOSS PER MEMBER UNIT – BASIC AND DILUTED	$	(.14	)	$	(.73	)	$	(.82	)	$	(.62	)

	Member Units			Unreturned Capital			Abandoned Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total Members' Equity
Balance, December 31, 2005		563,926		$	23,979,042		$	485,741		$	(21,331,102	)	$	3,133,681

Reinstatement of units to investor		199			11,938			(11,938	)					-

Distributions to investors					(498,532	)								(498,532	)

Net loss											(351,074	)		(351,074	)

Balance, September 30, 2006 (unaudited)		564,125			23,492,448			473,803			(21,682,176	)		2,284,075

Repurchase of units from investors		(13,881	)		(574,909	)		574,909			(65,935	)		(65,935	)

Distributions to investors					(164,989	)								(164,989	)

Net Loss											(349,524	)		(349,524	)

Balance, December 31, 2006		550,244			22,752,550			1,048,712			(22,097,635	)		1,703,627

Reinstatement of units to investor

Distributions to investors					(482,936	)								(482,936	)

Net Loss											(452,234	)		(452,234	)


Balance, September 30, 2007 (unaudited)		550,244		$	22,269,614		$	1,048,712		$	(22,549,869	)	$	768,457

	For the nine months ended September 30, 2007			For the nine months ended September 30, 2006
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(452,234	)	$	(351,074	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		74,649			79,934
(Increase) decrease in assets:
Other receivables		(1,157	)		(233,764	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		4,324			7,608
Deposits		42,373			(61,765	)
Advance on loan portfolio purchase		(410,811	)		-
Loan portfolios		1,313,007			2,159,225
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable		(45,346	)		(11,547	)
Accrued liabilities		199,949			75,222
Accrued interest		(6,660	)		28,563
Income taxes payable		(15,580	)		-
Net cash provided by operating activities		702,514			1,692,402

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to property and equipment		(33,574	)		(191,789	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net change in restricted cash		(27,033	)		(175,478	)
Loan proceeds from borrowing		1,396,825			2,379,418
Repayment of loans		(1,914,298	)		(3,837,170	)
Distributions to investors		(482,936	)		(498,532	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(1,027,442	)		(2,131,762	)

NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(358,502	)		(631,149	)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period		689,888			1,810,677

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	$	331,386		$	1,179,528

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

Income taxes paid	$	29,180		$	29,180

Interest paid	$	386,114		$	510,314

Performance Capital Management, LLC (“PCM LLC”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Matterhorn Financial Services, LLC (“Matterhorn”) (collectively the “Company”, unless stated otherwise) are engaged in the business of acquiring assets originated by federal and state banks and other sources, for the purpose of generating income and cash flow from managing, collecting, or selling those assets. These assets consist primarily of non-performing credit card loan portfolios and are purchased and sold as portfolios (“portfolios”). Additionally, some of the loan portfolios are assigned to third-party agencies for collection. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

PCM LLC was formed under a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Reorganization Plan and operating agreement. The plan called for the consolidation of five California limited partnerships and a California corporation into the new California limited liability company. The five California limited partnerships were formed for the purpose of acquiring investments in or direct ownership of non-performing credit card loan portfolios from financial institutions and other sources. The assets of the five limited partnerships consisted primarily of non-performing credit card loans, as well as cash. In late December 1998, these six entities voluntarily filed bankruptcy petitions, which were later consolidated into one case. PCM LLC was formed on January 14, 2002 and commenced operations upon the confirmation of its Bankruptcy Reorganization Plan (“Reorganization Plan”) on February 4, 2002.

In July 2004, the Company completed a credit facility (effective June 10, 2004) with Varde Investment Partners, L.P. (“Varde”), a participant in the debt collection industry, to augment portfolio purchasing capacity using capital provided by Varde. To implement the agreement, PCM LLC created a wholly-owned subsidiary, Matterhorn. The facility provides for up to $25 million of capital (counting each dollar loaned on a cumulative basis) over a five-year term. Varde is not under any obligation to make a loan to Matterhorn and Varde must agree on the terms for each specific advance under the loan facility. Under the terms of the facility, Varde will receive both interest and a portion of any residual collections on the portfolios acquired with a loan, after repayment of the purchase price (plus interest) to Varde and the Company and payment of servicing fees. Portfolios purchased using the facility will be owned by PCM LLC's subsidiary, Matterhorn. Varde has a first priority security interest in Matterhorn's assets securing repayment of its loans. In June 2007, the Company entered into an amendment to the Master Loan Agreement with Varde. The amendment extends the maturity date for principal and any other accrued but unpaid amounts on each loan from up to two years to up to three years for portfolio purchases using the Varde facility made on or after the effective date of the amendment.

The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, in accordance with the rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the operating results for the respective periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally present in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. The results for the nine months ending September 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2007.

In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Significant estimates have been made by management with respect to the timing and amount of collection of future cash flows from non-performing credit card loan portfolios. Among other things, the estimated future cash flows of the portfolios are used to recognize impairment in the purchased loan portfolios. Management reviews the estimate of future collections and it is reasonably possible that these estimates may change based on actual results and other factors. A change could be material to the financial statements.

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 159, “Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities – including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”), which is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The Company is currently analyzing the effects of the new standard and its potential impact on its financial statements, if any.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”), which is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company is currently analyzing the effects of the new standard and its potential impact on its financial statements, if any.

The Company defines cash equivalents as cash, money market investments, and overnight deposits with original maturities of less than three months. Cash equivalents are valued at cost, which approximates market. The Company maintains cash balances, which exceeded federally insured limits by approximately $600,000 as of September 30, 2007. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. Management believes it is not exposed to any significant risks on cash in bank accounts.

Restricted cash consists principally of cash held in a segregated account pursuant to the Company’s credit facility with Varde. The Company and Varde settle the status of these funds on a monthly basis pursuant to the credit facility. The proportion of the restricted cash ultimately disbursed by Matterhorn to Varde and PCM LLC depends upon a variety of factors, including the portfolios from which the cash is collected, the size of servicing fees on the portfolios that generated the cash, and the priority of payments due on the portfolios that generated the cash. Restricted cash is not considered to be a cash equivalent.

Long-term assets of the Company are reviewed annually as to whether their carrying value has become impaired. Management considers assets to be impaired if the carrying value exceeds the future projected cash flows from related operations. Management also re-evaluates the periods of amortization to determine whether subsequent events and circumstances warrant revised estimates of useful lives. As of September 30, 2007, management expects these assets to be fully recoverable.

PCM LLC accounts for its leases under the provisions of SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” and subsequent amendments, which require that leases be evaluated and classified as operating leases or capital leases for financial reporting purposes. The Company’s office lease is accounted for as an operating lease. The office lease contains certain provisions for incentive payments, future rent increases, and periods in which rent payments are reduced. The total amount of rental payments due over the lease term is being charged to rent expense on a straight-line method over the term of the lease. The difference between the rent expense recorded and the amount paid is credited or charged to “Deferred rent obligation,” which is included in “Accrued liabilities” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, leasehold improvements associated with this operating lease are amortized over the lease term.

The Company accounts for its investment in purchased loan portfolios utilizing either the interest method or the cost recovery method with the provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountant’s (AICPA) Statement of Position 03-03, “Accounting for Loans or Certain Securities Acquired in a Transfer” (“SOP 03-03”). Purchased loan portfolios consisted primarily of non-performing credit card accounts. Based on a study conducted by an independent consultant in the first half of 2007, the revenue recognition method used by the Company has changed to include the interest method for the majority of portfolios purchased after December 31, 2006. The study determined that the Company could reasonably estimate cash flows on most loan portfolios it purchases. However, if the estimated future cash flows cannot be reasonably estimated for a particular portfolio, the Company will use the cost recovery method. Application of the cost recovery method requires that any amounts received be applied first against the recorded amount of the portfolios; when that amount has been reduced to zero, any additional amounts received are recognized as net revenue. Acquired portfolios are initially recorded at their respective costs, and no accretable yield is recorded on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Accretable yield represents the amount of income the Company expects to generate over the remaining life of its existing investment in loan portfolios based on estimated future cash flows. Total accretable yield is the difference between future estimated collections and the current carrying value of a portfolio. All estimated cash flows on portfolios where the cost basis has been fully recovered are classified as zero basis cash flows.

Commencing with portfolios acquired on or after January 1, 2007, in accordance with the provisions of AICPA Statement of Position 03-03, “Accounting for Certain Debt Securities in a Transfer” (“SOP 03-03”), discrete loan portfolio purchases during a quarter, with the exception of those portfolios where the Company will continue to use the cost recovery method, are aggregated into pools based on common risk characteristics. The Company accounts for each static pool as a unit for the economic life of the pool (similar to one loan) for purposes of recognizing revenue from loan portfolios, applying collections to the cost basis of loan portfolios, and providing for loss or impairment.

Once a static pool is established, the portfolios are permanently assigned to the pool. The discount (i.e., the difference between the cost of each static pool and the related aggregate contractual loan balance) is not recorded because the Company expects to collect a relatively small percentage of each static pool’s contractual loan balance. As a result, loan portfolios are recorded at cost at the time of acquisition. This change in accounting method to the interest method is being reflected for the first time in the report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007.

The interest method applies an effective interest rate, or internal rate of return (“IRR”), to the cost basis of the pool, which is to remain unchanged throughout the life of the pool unless there is an increase in subsequent expected cash flows and is used for almost all loan portfolios purchased after December 31, 2006. The Company purchases loan portfolios usually in the late stages of the post charged off collection cycle. The Company can therefore, based on common characteristics, aggregate most purchases in a quarter into a common pool. Each static pool retains its own identity. Revenue from purchased loan portfolios is accrued based on each pool’s effective interest rate applied to each pool’s adjusted cost basis. The cost basis of each pool is increased by revenue earned and decreased by gross collections and impairments.

Collections on each static pool are allocated to revenue and principal reduction based on the estimated IRR, which is the rate of return that each static pool requires to amortize the cost or carrying value of the pool to zero over its estimated life. Each pool’s IRR is determined by estimating future cash flows, which are based on historical collection data for pools with similar characteristics. Based on historical cash collections, each pool is given an expected life of 60 months. The actual life of each pool may vary, but will generally amortize in approximately 60 months, with some pools amortizing sooner and some amortizing later. Monthly cash flows greater than the recognized revenue will reduce the carrying value of each static pool and monthly cash flows lower than the recognized revenue will increase the carrying value of the static pool. Each pool is reviewed at least quarterly and compared to historical trends to determine whether each static pool is performing as expected. This comparison is used to determine future estimated cash flows. Subsequent increases in cash flows expected to be collected are generally recognized prospectively through an upward adjustment of the pool’s effective IRR over its remaining life. Subsequent decreases in expected cash flows do not change the effective IRR, but are recognized as an impairment of the cost basis of the pool, and are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations as a reduction in revenue with a corresponding valuation allowance offsetting the investment in purchased loan portfolios in the consolidated financial statements. If the cash flow estimates increase subsequent to recording an impairment, reversal of the previously recognized impairment is made prior to any increases to the IRR.

Prior to January 1, 2007, revenue from all portfolios was accounted for using the cost recovery method of accounting in accordance with SOP 03-3, “Accounting for Loans or Certain Securities Acquired in a Transfer” and prior to January 1, 2005, the Company accounted for its investment in purchased loan portfolios using the cost recovery method under the guidance of Practice Bulletin 6, “Amortization of Discounts on Certain Acquired Loans”. For the Company’s acquired portfolios prior to January 1, 2007, the cost recovery method of accounting was and continues to be used. Under the cost recovery method, cash receipts relating to individual loan portfolios are applied first to recover the cost of the portfolios, prior to recognizing any revenue. Cash receipts in excess of the cost of the purchased loan portfolios are then recognized as net revenue.

The Company provides a valuation allowance for an acquired loan portfolio when the present value of expected future cash flows does not exceed the carrying value of the portfolio. Over the life of the portfolio, the Company’s management will continue to review the carrying values of each loan for impairment. If net present value of expected future cash flows falls below the carrying value of the related portfolio, the valuation allowance is adjusted accordingly.

Retired or abandoned capital represents LLC units that are either voluntarily returned to the Company by a member or LLC units that are redeemed and cancelled following a procedure authorized by PCM LLC’s plan of reorganization to eliminate the interests of PCM LLC members that PCM LLC has not been able to locate. In the first quarter of 2006, 199 LLC units of previously cancelled LLC units were reinstated due to a beneficiary heir establishing ownership. In December 2006, 13,881 LLC units, which were purchased for approximately $66,000, were retired in connection with the Company’s odd lot buy back program conducted in December 2006 (discussed in further detail in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006).

Certain amounts in the prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statement presentation. Certain adjustments have been made to numbers for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, to reflect the adoption of the interest method of accounting for portfolio revenue (see Revenue Recognition above in this Note 3). These adjustments were necessary to prepare the consolidated statement of operations for the period ended September 30, 2007.

The Company refers to the discounted present value of the actual amount of money that it believes a portfolio will ultimately produce as the "fair value"of the portfolio. The estimated fair value and the methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair values of the financial instruments of the Company as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are as follows. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and liabilities approximate their fair values. The total and retained fair values of purchased loan portfolios were determined based on both market pricing and discounted expected cash flows. The total fair value of the Company’s portfolios includes fair value attributable to the residual interests of third parties in collections once all funds (including funds invested by the Company) invested in a portfolio have been repaid (with interest) and all servicing fees have been paid. The retained fair value of the Company’s portfolios excludes fair value attributable to these residual interests. The discount rate is based on an acceptable rate of return adjusted for the risk inherent in the loan portfolios. The discount rate utilized at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was 20%. The estimated total fair value of loan portfolios was $19.0 million and $22.0 million at September 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, respectively, and the estimated retained fair value of loan portfolios was $18.5 million and $21.3 million at September 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, respectively.

The Company utilizes the interest method for loan portfolios purchased after December 31, 2006. Revenue related to the Company’s investment in purchased loan portfolios consists of two components: (i) revenue from those loan portfolios purchased in 2007 that have a remaining book value and are accounted for on an accrual basis under the interest method (“Accrual Basis Portfolios”); and (ii) revenue from those portfolios that have no remaining cost basis that are accounted for under the cost recovery method of accounting for which every dollar of gross collections is recorded as zero basis revenue.

Prior to January 1, 2007, the Company was not reasonably able to estimate the amount and timing of future cash collections on a pool of loan portfolios. All portfolios were accounted for using the cost recovery method (“Cost Recovery Portfolios”). Under the cost recovery method of accounting, no income is recognized until the purchase price of a Cost Recovery Portfolio has been fully recovered. As of September 30, 2007, the Company had $3.7 million in investment in purchased loan portfolios, of which $2.4 million is accounted for using the interest method. As of September 30, 2007, the portfolios accounted for using the cost recovery method consisted of $1.3 million in net book value of investment in loan portfolios and represented all of the portfolios acquired prior to January 1, 2007.

	Quarter Ended Sept. 30, 2007			Quarter Ended Sept. 30, 2006			Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, 2007			Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, 2006
Balance, beginning of period	$	4,526,210		$	7,611,599		$	5,000,942		$	8,446,724
Purchased loan portfolios, net		164,461			367,388			2,567,400			4,057,131
Collections on loan portfolios		(2,751,537	)		(3,222,036	)		(9,063,594	)		(10,459,125	)
Sales of loan portfolios		(1,211	)		(20,000	)		(155,824	)		(1,552,610	)
Revenue recognized on collections		1,889,294			1,530,548			5,498,801			5,243,651
Revenue recognized on sales		-			20,000			14,789			551,728
Cash collection applied to principal		(139,282	)		-			(174,579	)		-
Balance, end of period	$	3,687,935		$	6,287,499		$	3,687,935		$	6,287,499

As of September 30, 2007, the Company had approximately $3.7 million in investment in purchased loan portfolios, of which approximately $2.4 million is accounted for using the interest method. This balance will be amortized based upon current projections of cash collections in excess of revenue applied to the principal balance. The estimated amortization of the investment in purchased loan portfolios under the interest method is as follows:

During 2004, the Company entered into an agreement for a credit facility with Varde that provides for up to $25 million of capital (counting each dollar loaned on a cumulative basis) over a five-year term ending in July 2009. In June 2007, the Company entered into an amendment to its agreement with Varde, which extended the maturity date for principal and any other accrued but unpaid amounts on each loan from up to two years to up to three years for portfolio purchases using the Varde facility made on or after the effective date of the amendment. PCM LLC’s wholly-owned subsidiary Matterhorn owed approximately $3.9 million and $4.5 million at September 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, respectively, under the facility in connection with its purchase of certain charged-off loan portfolios. The total amount borrowed was approximately $14.0 million at September 30, 2007 and $12.6 million at December 31, 2006. Each advance has minimum payment threshold points. Each advance has a term of up to three years and bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum. These obligations are scheduled to be paid in full on dates ranging from December 2007 to June 2010, with the approximate following principal payments due:

Once all funds (including funds invested by the Company) invested in a portfolio financed by Varde have been repaid with interest and all servicing fees have been paid, Varde will begin to receive a residual interest in collections of that portfolio. Depending on the performance of the portfolio, these residual interests may never be paid, they may begin being paid a significant time later than Varde’s loan is repaid (i.e., after the funds invested by the Company are repaid with interest), or, in circumstances where the portfolio performs extremely well, the loan could be repaid early and Varde could conceivably begin to receive its residual interest on or before the date that the loan obligation was originally scheduled to be paid in full. Varde has a first priority security interest in all the assets of Matterhorn, securing repayment of its loans and payment of its residual interest. PCM LLC, Matterhorn’s parent operating company, has guarantied certain of Matterhorn's operational obligations under the loan documents. The amount of remaining available credit under the facility was approximately $11.0 million at September 30, 2007 and $12.4 at December 31, 2006. The assets of Matterhorn that provide security for Varde's loan were carried at a cost of approximately $2.5 million at September 30, 2007.

Under the loan agreement with Varde, the Company was required to pay the balance of one of its loans in full by the due date of April 28, 2007. The balance outstanding of the loan on that date was approximately $702,000. The balance outstanding of the loan at September 30, 2007 was $466,000. The portfolio continues to generate revenue through collections but at a slower rate than forecasted. In May 2007, Varde gave the Company an extension and a limited forbearance from any action until July 31, 2007. After further discussions with Varde regarding the timing of the payment, in July 2007, the Company obtained another extension and limited forbearance from any action until December 31, 2007.

Rental expense for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006, amounted to approximately $80,000 and $84,000, respectively. Rental expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006, amounted to approximately $240,000 and $252,000, respectively. PCM LLC is obligated under two five-year equipment leases, one expiring in 2009 with minimum payments of $4,800 per year and the other lease expiring in 2011 with minimum payments of $3,900 per year.

The Company has a defined contribution plan covering all eligible full-time employees of Performance Capital Management (the Plan Sponsor) who are currently employed by the Company and have completed six months of service from the time of enrollment. The Plan was established by the Plan Sponsor to provide retirement income for its employees and is subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA).

PCM LLC did not experience the level of cash reserves that it expected during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, largely due to a decrease in collection revenues and continued expenditures to purchase new portfolios. In order to conserve working capital necessary to run the business, PCM LLC’s Board of Directors decided at its October 2007 meeting to forego third quarter PCM LLC unit holder distributions, which would normally have occurred in October.

At the October 2007 meeting of the Board of Directors of PCM LLC, the Board approved three changes to LLC unit ownership effective October 1, 2007. The changes were as follows. First, a total of 548 LLC units were voluntarily forfeited and returned to the Company by eight unit holders and were subsequently canceled. Second, 199 LLC units of previously canceled LLC units were reinstated due to a beneficiary heir establishing ownership. These 199 LLC units had previously been canceled in accordance with PCM LLC's Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Reorganization Plan, which provides a method to eliminate the interests of PCM LLC members that PCM LLC has not been able to locate for a period of time. Finally, 16 LLC units that were previously reported in the Company’s buyback program that took place in December 2006 were reinstated to correct an ownership discrepancy. The aggregate effect of the changes is a decrease in the number of LLC units outstanding from 550,244 to 549,911.

Except for the historical information presented in this document, the matters discussed in this Form 10-QSB, and specifically in “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” or otherwise incorporated by reference into this document contain “forward-looking statements” (as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “plans,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “intends,” “should,” “plan,” or “anticipates” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. The safe harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, apply to forward-looking statements made by Performance Capital Management, LLC. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements due to their inherent uncertainty. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. The actual results that we achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements due to such risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, and we assume no obligation to update this information. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report on Form 10-QSB and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes and the other financial information appearing elsewhere in this report and with the financial information contained in our report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Form 10-KSB contains a general description of our industry and a discussion of recent trends affecting the industry.

We acquire assets originated by federal and state banking and savings institutions, loan agencies, and other sources, for the purpose of generating income and cash flow from collecting or selling those assets. Typically, these assets consist of charged-off credit card contracts. These assets are typically purchased and sold as portfolios. We purchase portfolios using our own cash resources and funds borrowed from a third party. In January 2007, we started a third-party collection program to engage in the collection of debt on behalf of other parties, whereby we earn fees contingent upon the amount we collect. We will enter into third-party collection arrangements that we believe will increase our collection efficiency. Third party collection revenues have been minimal during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

Before purchasing a portfolio, we conduct due diligence to assess the value of the portfolio. We try to purchase portfolios at a substantial discount to the actual amount of money that they will ultimately produce, so that we can recover the cost we pay for portfolios, repay funds borrowed to purchase portfolios, pay our collection and operating costs and still have a profit. We believe that market conditions currently make it difficult, although not impossible, to purchase portfolios at prices that will permit us to accomplish these objectives. We record our portfolios at cost based on the purchase price. We reduce the cost bases of our portfolios on a portfolio-by-portfolio basis: (i) based on collections under the cost recovery revenue recognition method; and (ii) by amortizing over the life expectancy of the portfolio under the interest revenue recognition method, which we will be using for the majority of our loan portfolios purchased in 2007 and thereafter. The cost basis of a portfolio is also reduced by sales of a portion or all of the portfolio and by impairment of the net realizable value of the portfolio.

We frequently sell certain portions of portfolios we purchase, in many instances to retain those accounts that best fit our collection profile and to reduce our purchase commitment by reselling the others. We then collect those accounts we retain as a distinct portfolio. We do not generally purchase loan portfolios solely with a view to their resale, and for this reason we generally do not show portfolios on our balance sheet as "held for investment". From time to time we sell some of our portfolios either to capitalize on market conditions, to dispose of a portfolio that is not performing or to dispose of a portfolio whose collection life, from our perspective, has run its course. When we engage in these sales, we continue collecting the portfolio right up until the closing of the sale.

We earn revenues from collecting our portfolios and from selling our portfolios or portions of our portfolios. Under the cost recovery method, we recognize gross revenue when we collect an account and when we sell a portfolio or a portion of it. Under the interest method of accounting, portfolio collection revenue is accrued based on each pool’s effective interest rate applied to the pool’s adjusted cost basis. The cost basis of each pool is increased by revenue earned and decreased by gross collections and impairments.

On our statement of operations, when using the cost recovery method, we reduce our total revenues by the cost basis recovery of our portfolios to arrive at net revenue. For collections revenue, we reduce the cost basis of the portfolio dollar-for-dollar until we have completely recovered the cost basis of the portfolio. Alternatively, the interest method applies an effective interest rate, or internal rate of return (“IRR”), to the cost basis of the pool, which is to remain unchanged throughout the life of the pool unless there is an increase in subsequent expected cash flows. The interest method of accounting will be used for most loan portfolios purchased after December 31, 2006. When we sell all or a portion of a portfolio, to the extent of remaining cost basis for the portfolio, we reduce the cost basis of the portfolio by a percentage of the original portfolio cost.

For those portfolios where we are using the cost recovery method of accounting, our net revenues from portfolio collections may vary from quarter to quarter because the number and magnitude of portfolios where we are still recovering costs may vary, and because the return rates of portfolios whose costs we have already recovered in full may vary. Similarly, our net revenues from portfolio sales may vary from quarter to quarter depending on the number and magnitude of portfolios (or portions) we decide to sell and the market values of the sold portfolios (or portions) relative to their cost bases.

We refer to the discounted present value of the actual amount of money that we believe a portfolio will ultimately produce as the “fair value” of the portfolio. If we conduct our business successfully, the aggregate fair value of our portfolios should be substantially greater than the aggregate cost basis of our portfolios presented on our balance sheet. We must make assumptions to determine fair value, the most significant of which are the magnitude and timing of future collections and the discount rate used to determine present value. Because of the inherent uncertainty associated with predicting future events, our determinations of fair value at any particular point in time are only estimates, and actual fair value could ultimately vary significantly from our estimate.

In general, we expect increases in the cost basis of our portfolios presented on our balance sheet to accompany increases in portfolio fair value. For those portfolios where we are using the cost recovery method, the magnitude and timing of our collections could cause cost basis to decline in some quarters when fair value actually increases as a result of “front-loading” our cost basis recovery instead of matching portfolio cost basis recovery to revenue on a proportionate basis over the life of the portfolio. Our purchasing patterns could reinforce this divergence. A decrease in the magnitude of new portfolio acquisitions (i.e., failing to reinvest all of cash collections representing cost basis recovery) may still result in a fair value increase because new portfolios generally have a fair value that exceeds their purchase price. This effect is being mitigated to some extent by the Company’s switch to the interest method of accounting for most loan portfolios purchased after December 31, 2006.

We plan to realize the difference between fair value and cost basis over time as we collect our portfolios. We generally collect our portfolios over periods of time ranging from three to seven years, with the bulk of a portfolio's yield coming in the first three years we collect it. If we succeed in collecting our portfolios and realize the difference between fair value and cost basis of our portfolios, we will recover the cost we paid for them, repay the loans used to purchase them, pay our collection and operating costs, and still have excess cash.

Our statement of operations has generally reported proportionately low net revenues in periods that have substantial collections of recently purchased portfolios, due to the “front-loaded” cost basis recovery associated with new portfolios. As a result, during times of rapid growth in our portfolio purchases (and probably for several quarters thereafter), our statement of operations has shown a net loss. As purchases slow and more collections come from older portfolios whose cost bases have been completely recovered, and with the implementation of the interest method of accounting, our statement of operations is expected to begin reporting net income, assuming our portfolios perform over time as anticipated and we collect them in an efficient manner. The switch to the interest method of accounting as of January 1, 2007 contributes to a decrease in the front-loading effect by amortizing the portfolio loan costs over the expected life of the loan portfolio. For the foreseeable future, we intend to continue seeking new large dollar-volume portfolio purchases using our loan facility with Varde Investment Partners, L.P. (“Varde”).

Our operating costs and expenses consist principally of salaries and benefits and general and administrative expenses. Fluctuations in our salaries and benefits correspond roughly to fluctuations in our headcount. Our general and administrative expenses include non-salaried collection costs, legal collections costs and telephone, rent and professional expenses. Fluctuations in telephone and collection costs generally correspond to the volume of accounts we are attempting to collect. Professional expenses tend to vary based on specific issues we must resolve.

We present our financial statements based on our February 4, 2002, emergence from bankruptcy being treated as the inception of our business. In our emergence from bankruptcy, we succeeded to the assets and liabilities of six entities that were in bankruptcy. The equity owners of these entities approved a reorganization plan under which the owners of these six entities agreed to receive ownership interests in Performance Capital Management, LLC, in exchange for their ownership interests in the predecessor entities. Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our parent operating company, Performance Capital Management, LLC, and its wholly-owned special purpose subsidiary Matterhorn Financial Services LLC, a California limited liability company (“Matterhorn"). All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

We present investments in portfolios on our consolidated balance sheet at the lower of cost, market, or estimated net realizable value. As discussed above, we reduce the cost basis of a portfolio on a proportionate basis when we sell a portion of the portfolio, and we treat amounts collected on a portfolio as a reduction to the carrying basis of the portfolio (i) on an individual portfolio basis using the cost recovery method and (ii) over the life of the pool using the interest method. When we present financial statements, we assess the estimated net realizable value of our portfolios or pools each quarter on a portfolio-by-portfolio basis under the cost recovery method or on a pooling basis under the interest method, and we reduce the value of any portfolio or pool that has suffered impairment because its cost basis exceeds its estimated net realizable value. Estimated net realizable value represents management’s estimates, based upon present plans and intentions, of the discounted present value of future collections. We must make assumptions to determine estimated net realizable value, the most significant of which are the magnitude and timing of future collections and the discount rate used to determine present value. Unlike a pool under the interest method, once we write down a particular portfolio under the cost recovery method we do not increase it in subsequent periods if our plans and intentions or our assumptions change.

We present the fair value of our portfolios only in the notes to our financial statements, not in the basic financial statements themselves. In order to understand our financial statements, the reader must understand the concepts involved in estimation of the fair value of our portfolios, as discussed in the section above entitled “Overview”. Because of the inherent uncertainty associated with predicting future events, our determinations of fair value at any particular point in time are only estimates, and actual fair value could ultimately vary significantly from our estimate.

Under the cost recovery method, when we collect an account in a portfolio, we reduce the cost basis of the portfolio dollar-for-dollar until we have completely recovered the cost basis of the portfolio. We believe this method of accounting for the amortization of the purchase price of our portfolios is conservative and minimizes the effect of estimation on our results of operations. This policy has the effect of “front-loading” expenses, however, and may result in a portfolio initially showing no net revenue for a period of time and then showing only net revenue once we have recovered its entire cost basis.

We recently retained an outside consultant to conduct a study to determine whether we should continue using the cost recovery method of accounting for all of our portfolios or switch to a method that matches portfolio cost basis to revenue over the projected life of the portfolio. The accounting method used depends largely upon a determination of our ability to accurately project the timing and amount of collections for portfolios we acquire. The consultant found that we are capable of determining the amount of revenue a portfolio is expected to generate over its life for portfolios that we have sufficient historical data and experience to accurately estimate future cash flows. As a result of this finding and further analysis by our Audit Committee members and management, our Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, which approved, the adoption of the interest method of accounting to be applied to the majority of portfolios purchased after December 31, 2006. For those portfolios purchased on or before December 31, 2006, and for portfolios purchased after that date where we do not have sufficient historical data and experience to accurately estimate the timing of collections revenue over its life, we will use the cost recovery method.

When we sell a portfolio or a portion of it, to the extent of remaining cost basis for the portfolio, we reduce the cost basis of the portfolio by a percentage of the original portfolio cost. Our policy does not take into account whether the portion of the portfolio we are selling may be more or less valuable than the remaining accounts that comprise the portfolio. We believe our policy, which is grounded in this objective measure for cost basis recovery, is preferable to a policy that would attempt to estimate whether a portion of a portfolio being sold is more or less valuable than the remaining accounts that comprise the portfolio, because our policy minimizes the effect of estimation on our results of operations.

As discussed in greater detail below, our credit facility with Varde provides for up to $25 million of capital (counting each dollar loaned on a cumulative basis) over a five-year term ending in July 2009. The facility provides for Varde to receive a residual interest in portfolio collections after all funds invested in the portfolio have been repaid (with interest) and all servicing fees have been paid. We do not record a liability for contingent future payments of residual interests due to the distressed nature of the portfolio assets and the lack of assurance that collections sufficient to result in a liability will actually occur. When such payments actually occur, we reflect them in our statement of operations as other financing costs.

Our total net revenues increased by $339,000 to $1.9 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2007, from $1.6 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2006. Portfolio collections provided 100.0% of our total net revenues in the quarter ended September 30, 2007 and 98.7% of our total net revenues in the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The increase in net revenues is due, in part, to the effect of using the interest method of accounting to recognize revenue from portfolio purchases made after December 31, 2006. The interest method increased third quarter 2007 net collection revenues by $356,000. This is because, unlike the cost recovery method which requires the portfolio cost to be recovered before revenue can be recognized, the interest method recognizes revenue and spreads the portfolio cost over the life of the portfolio on an amortized basis. The net revenue from collections for the third quarter of 2006 on the other hand was reported using the cost recovery method of accounting. If the cost recovery method was used for all net portfolio collection revenue during the nine months ended September, 30 2007, the net portfolio collection revenue would be approximately the same for the third quarter of 2007 as it was for the third quarter 2006.

We acquired $4.2 million of new portfolios during the year ended December 31, 2006, and $2.6 million of new portfolios during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, $2.0 million of which was purchased in the latter part of the second quarter of 2007. During 2005, we acquired $11.5 million of new portfolios ($11.0 million after adjusting for a January 2006 sale of a $461,000 portion of a portfolio purchased in December 2005). The decline is due principally to the current market conditions for portfolios, which continues to make purchasing portfolios at a reasonable price difficult.

During the fourth quarter of 2005 and the first quarter of 2006, analysts and participants in the debt-buying industry began to speculate whether charged-off debt is overpriced. The March 2006 issue of Kaulkin Ginsberg’s Global Debt Buying Report reports that prices in the debt buying market doubled over the two years between 2003 and 2005. The February 2006 issue of Collections and Credit Risk focused on the influx of $350 million to $400 million of public and private capital the industry has seen since November 2002 - and the demands of that capital to be deployed to earn returns - as a primary cause of price increases. The article does not predict imminent price decreases, however, suggesting instead that capital will not exit the industry (and relieve price pressures) until debt buyers and collectors begin to report unfavorable operating results. We are beginning to see prices in the secondary market stabilize, but expect overall market conditions to remain the same in the fourth quarter of 2007. If we are unable to acquire new portfolios that meet our criteria for generating net income, our collection revenue will continue to decline.

There were no portfolio sales during the quarter ended September 30, 2007 compared to $20,000 in net portfolio sales revenue during the quarter ended September 30, 2006. We may engage in further sales if we identify portfolios or portions of portfolios that are not performing to our expectations and we believe market conditions are acceptable. We continue collection efforts for certain accounts in these portfolios right up until the point of sale. We also anticipate continuing to sell portions of newly acquired portfolios from time to time, but do not expect to generate substantial net revenues from these sales.

Our total operating costs and expenses were at $1.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to $1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and our total collections are at $2.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to $3.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Our ratio of operating costs and expenses to total collections (i.e., excluding the effect of portfolio sales), a measure of collection efficiency, increased to 66.4% for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, from 54.2% for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The decline in collection efficiency is the result of a decrease in collection revenues and a corresponding increase in operating costs and expenses, primarily due to an increase in legal collections costs, which requires significant front end expenses with the anticipated payout coming at a later date.

We intend to continue monitoring our collection efficiency and reduce variable costs required to collect each dollar of revenue when necessary to maintain the working capital needed to run our operations. In order to maintain the working capital necessary to run our operations, we will continue to strive to maintain a careful balance between portfolios we purchase using our own cash (where collection revenues are immediately available to us in full) and portfolios we purchase using the Varde credit facility (where we must immediately apply a substantial portion of collections to debt service). These efforts have been somewhat hampered recently due to our lower cash reserves and higher portfolio prices, which has resulted in the continued use of the Varde facility to compete effectively for portfolios and a corresponding decrease in the percentage of our own funds used to purchase the portfolios. We expect these circumstances to proportionately increase our interest expense and other financing costs.

Our general and administration expenses increased by $112,000 to $807,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, from $695,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. This was due to a large extent on the costs resulting from the increased use of legal collections, which increased by $142,000 to $176,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2007, from $34,000 in the three months ended September 30, 2006. Our salaries and benefits expenses remained stable at $1.0 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006.

We continue to manage our existing infrastructure in order to maximize efficiencies. Our headcount of floor collectors, including supervisors, was 55 at September 30, 2007, as compared to 66 at September 30, 2006. The decrease was due primarily to our efforts to: (i) keep our collections infrastructure in line with our portfolio acquisitions; (ii) focus collections on those portfolios or portions of portfolios that we believe will generate the most revenue in the near term; and (iii) significantly increase our legal collections using internal staff and third party law firms. We do not anticipate needing to add personnel in connection with the increased use of legal collections since most of those collection efforts are performed by third parties. In addition, we are working to improve the significant employee turnover we have experienced among our collectors in an effort to reduce expenses associated with recruitment and training.

Our total net revenues decreased by $282,000 to $5.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, from $5.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. This was largely due to a decrease in net revenue from portfolio sales in 2007, which resulted in $15,000 of net revenue, as compared to 2006, which resulted in $552,000 of net revenue, a decrease of $537,000. As a result, net portfolio collections provided 99.7% of our total net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 90.5% of our total net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

We expect our total net collection revenue to be higher in 2007 than it was in 2006, which is consistent with the change in our revenue recognition method to the interest method for portfolios purchased after December 31, 2006. Our net revenues from portfolio collections increased by $255,000 to $5.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, from $5.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase in net collections revenue was due in part to use of the interest method to account for revenues from portfolio purchases made after December 31, 2006. The interest method increased the 2007 net collection revenues for the first nine months by $455,000. This is because, unlike the cost recovery method which requires the portfolio cost to be recovered before revenue can be recognized, the interest method recognizes revenue and spreads the portfolio cost over the life of the portfolio on an amortized basis. The net revenue from collections for the first three quarters of 2006 was reported using the cost recovery method. If the cost recovery method was used for all net collection revenue during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the net portfolio collection revenue would be approximately $455,000 less for the first nine months of 2007 as compared to the first nine months of 2006.

During 2006, we saw our total revenue from collections increase as we began to exploit the purchases we made in 2005 and 2006. In 2005, we acquired $11.5 million of new portfolios ($11.0 million after adjusting for a January 2006 sale of a $461,000 portion of a portfolio purchased in December 2005). In June 2007, we purchased $2.0 million of new portfolios, resulting in total portfolio purchases in nine months ended September 30, 2007 of $2.6 million as compared to $4.1 million of portfolio purchases in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. We have seen our gross collections from portfolios decrease as we begin to experience the effects of fewer portfolio purchases. We do not expect our gross collections from portfolios in 2007 to be as large as our 2006 portfolio collection revenue.

In an effort to increase the accounts we service to maximize use of our collection infrastructure, we started a program in the first half of 2007 to collect debt owned by others. In January 2007, we entered into a third-party collection arrangement and began collecting on portfolios owned by another party. Third-party debt collection arrangements are generally commission-based with the objective of earning fees in excess of the costs to collect. We will enter into third-party collection arrangements that we believe will generate enough income in fees to result in net returns. We generated additional net revenue of $106,000 from third-party collections arrangements during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. We do not yet know how effective this program will be at supplementing the revenue we generate from portfolio collections. Our success is largely dependent upon the volume of such arrangements we secure and the quality and types of debt we service for third parties. If the portfolios have been heavily worked or we are not experienced at collecting the type of accounts being serviced, we may not generate income from such third party collections in excess of our costs of collection. In addition to acquiring our own portfolios and acting as a third-party collection agency, we are implementing other collection strategies in an effort to increase our revenues and collection efficiency, such as expanding use of the legal process to collect specific accounts determined to be suitable for such an approach and improving the accuracy and currency of debtor contact information contained in our databases.

We have substantially increased our legal collections efforts in the first three quarters of 2007 as we seek to generate revenue from accounts we believe might otherwise not be collectible. We initiate collection lawsuits on our own behalf, thereby internalizing the costs of such collections. We also utilize our network of third party law firms on a commission basis in cases where we determine that it is financially or strategically prudent. Legal collections tend to have longer time horizons but are expected to contribute to an increase in returns over two to five years. The method used to select accounts for legal collections is a critical component of a successful legal collections program. If accounts are accurately selected, overall collection efficiency should increase. We do not have a set policy regarding when to initiate legal process; we exercise our judgment based on a variety of factors to determine when we believe using legal process is appropriate. With all of our collections efforts, we are keenly aware that claims based on the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and comparable state statutes may result in lawsuits, including class action lawsuits, which could be material to the Company due to the remedies available under these statutes, including punitive damages. No such lawsuits have been filed against the Company.

Our net revenues from portfolio sales are showing significant decreases in 2007 as compared to 2006 and 2005. As part of our program to emphasize efforts to continue to collect and realize a reasonable return on our portfolios, in 2006 we identified one larger portfolio that was not performing to our expectations. We sold this portfolio for $1.1 million with Varde’s consent in the first quarter of 2006 on terms we considered acceptable. We also sold a $461,000 portion of a portfolio purchased in December 2005. Our overall net income of $264,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2006 was essentially due to the net revenues we derived from these portfolio sales. We have had no similar sales in 2007. We may engage in further sales if we identify portfolios that are not performing to our expectations and we believe market conditions are acceptable. We continue collection efforts for certain accounts in portfolios right up until the point of sale. We also anticipate continuing to sell portions of newly acquired portfolios from time to time, but we do not expect to generate substantial net revenues from these sales.

Net revenues from portfolio sales of $15,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to $552,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, a $537,000 decrease, was primarily responsible for increasing our net loss to $452,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, from a net loss of $351,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. If we exclude the effect of portfolio sales, our net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, increased to $903,000, and our net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, increased to $467,000. Our net loss, excluding the effect of portfolio sales, decreased period-to-period due to the effect of changing to the interest method for income recognition for portfolios purchased after December 31, 2006, which resulted in an increase in portfolio collection revenue of $455,000. If our purchasing patterns continue to be slow, however, we believe our collection activity may eventually show net income for those portfolios where we use the cost recovery method due to front-loaded cost basis recovery and these older portfolios becoming fully recovered.

Our total operating costs and expenses remained relatively constant at $5.5 million at September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006, while our total collections decreased to $9.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, from $10.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2006, a $1.4 million decline. Our ratio of operating costs and expenses to total collections (i.e., excluding the effect of portfolio sales), a measure of collection efficiency, increased to 61.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, from 52.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The decline in collection efficiency is the result of a decrease in collection revenues without a corresponding decrease in operating costs and expenses, primarily due to an increase in legal collections costs, which requires significant front end expenses with the anticipated payout coming at a later date. The total operating costs and expenses do not include the effects of interest expense and other financing costs, which decreased from $629,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 to $448,000 for the same period in 2007. If interest and other financing costs are added to total operating costs and expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the total operating and interest and finance expenses was $6.0 million compared to total operating and interest and finance expenses of $6.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. We were not successful in executing our plan to continue increasing total revenues (while holding infrastructure costs down) and reducing variable costs required to collect each dollar of revenue. Our primary obstacle has been the inability to obtain sufficient portfolios at reasonable prices, which has caused a decrease in portfolio collections. We believe that our agreement with Varde has played, and will continue to play, a significant role in enabling us to purchase additional portfolios and thereby increase the volume of accounts we have available to collect. Any portfolio purchases, whether using the Varde facility or our own funds, depends largely upon the availability of reasonably priced portfolios.

Our interest expense and other financing costs decreased to $448,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, from $629,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. This corresponds with the decrease in the amount of loans payable to Varde. This trend was offset somewhat by the purchases we made in June 2007. In order to maintain the working capital necessary to run our operations, we will continue to strive to maintain a careful balance between portfolios we purchase using our own cash (where collection revenues are immediately available to us in full) and portfolios we purchase using the Varde credit facility (where we must immediately apply a substantial portion of collections to debt service). These efforts have been somewhat hampered recently due to our lower cash reserves and higher portfolio prices, which has resulted in the continued use of the Varde facility to compete effectively for portfolios and a corresponding decrease in the percentage of our own funds used to purchase the portfolios. We expect these circumstances to proportionately increase our interest and other financing costs over time.

Our salaries and benefits expenses remained relatively constant at $3.1 million for the first three quarters of 2007 and $3.2 million for the first three quarters of 2006. Our general and administrative expenses were comparable at $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and $2.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. Our legal collections expenses increased by over $239,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to the same period in 2006 and were included in our general and administrative expenses. This increase was due to an increased emphasis on our legal collections, which results in considerable front end expenses. In June 2007, we were able to purchase $2.0 million of portfolios, resulting in total portfolio purchases during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 of $2.6 million as compared to $4.1 million of portfolio purchases during the same period in 2006. We expect our operating expenses to remain relatively constant due to our efforts to continue to utilize our existing infrastructure as we work to increase portfolio collection revenues.

Our cash, including restricted cash, and cash equivalents decreased to $850,000 at September 30, 2007 from $1.2 million at December 31, 2006. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, our portfolio collections and sales generated $9.1 million of cash, we borrowed $1.4 million, and we used $5.9 million for operating and other activities, $2.6 million to purchase new portfolios, $1.9 million to repay loans, $483,000 for distributions to unit holders, and $34,000 to acquire computer and office equipment. Historically, our primary sources of cash have been cash flows from operations and borrowings. Recently, cash has been used for acquisitions of loan portfolios, the repurchase of LLC Units, moving expenses, payment of cash distributions to our unit holders, repayments of borrowings, purchases of property and equipment, growing our legal collections program and general working capital.

The large cost basis recovery associated with our portfolios under the cost recovery method has made it difficult to generate the profit called for in our business plan – to recover the cost we pay for our portfolios, repay funds borrowed to purchase portfolios, pay our collecting and operating costs and still have a profit – and may continue to cause our statement of operations to show a net loss. Excluding the results from portfolio sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, our operating, interest and other expenses of $6.0 million exceeded our total net revenues from collections of $5.5 million. We believe these results are partly due to the higher prices of recently purchased portfolios. In an effort to offset the decline in portfolio purchases, we continue to strive to maximize the use of our collections infrastructure by focusing our efforts on collecting the right portfolios or portions of portfolios in an efficient manner as well as increase our legal collections. We believe our future results will reflect progress in this area.

We did not experience the level of cash reserves that we expected during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, largely due to the decrease in collection revenues and continued expenditures to purchase new loan portfolios, as well as expenditures outside of historical operating expenses in the latter part of 2006 and in the first half of 2007, including the repurchase of LLC Units from our unit holders, moving expenses, costs associated with the addition of a third party collections program and expansion of our legal collections efforts. Both of these collection efforts require front end investment with the goal of producing positive cash flows in the future. In order to conserve working capital necessary to run our business, our Board of Directors decided at its October 2007 meeting to forego third quarter distributions to our unit holders, which would normally have occured in October. In addition to foregoing distributions, we will continue to monitor our collection infrastructure to maximize efficiencies in an effort to maintain or reduce expenses.

According to the February 2006 issue of Collections and Credit Risk, the increasing prices of portfolios have resulted in buyers having to abandon the old rule of thumb that they will collect three times a portfolio’s purchase price in three years and instead are settling for collecting two to two and a half times the portfolio’s purchase price in three to five years. In addition, our participation in portfolio purchases using the Varde credit facility has been decreasing, which has proportionately increased the size of the Varde loans and we expect will result in an increase in our interest expense and other financing costs. In June 2007, we entered into an amendment to the Master Loan Agreement with Varde to address these issues. The amendment extends the maturity date for principal and any other accrued but unpaid amounts on each loan purchased on or after the effective date of the amendment from up to two years to up to three years. This change was made to allow more time for a portfolio purchased using the Varde facility to generate sufficient collection revenues to pay the balance of the Varde loans in full by their due dates.

Under the loan agreement with Varde, we were required to pay the balance of one of our loans in full by the due date of April 28, 2007. The balance outstanding of the loan on that date was approximately $702,000. The balance outstanding of the loan at September 30, 2007 was $466,000. The portfolio continues to generate revenue through collections but at a slower rate than forecasted. In May 2007, Varde gave us an extension and a limited forbearance from any action until July 31, 2007. After further discussions with Varde regarding the timing of the payment and consistent with the amendment to the Master Loan Agreement to extend maturity dates of loans, in July 2007, we obtained another extension and limited forbearance from any action until December 31, 2007. We will continue to work the portfolio, and may sell all or a portion of it, to generate sufficient income to pay the balance due to Varde on or before December 31, 2007 or we may seek another extension and limited forbearance from Varde.

During 2006, we purchased $4.2 million of portfolios. The current market conditions make it likely that we will acquire portfolios at a slower pace in 2007 as compared to 2006. In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we purchased $2.6 million of new portfolios. What we purchase will continue to depend on our assessment of market conditions, as well as the amount of liquid cash and other financial resources available to us. In an attempt to compete in a highly competitive marketplace and operate as efficiently as possible, we will continue to focus on becoming more sophisticated in determining which portfolios or portions of portfolios provide the greatest return and which bring collection efficiency down. As a result of this analysis, we continue to focus our collection efforts on those portions of portfolios that we expect will generate the most returns.

We have used our dialer to ensure that our collectors focus on portfolios that continue to show results. By monitoring the results of calls originated through our dialer, we identified portfolios that required more cost to collect than others. Particularly where we had worked to collect these portfolios over an extended period of time, we determined that some of our portfolios’ collection lives had run their course from our perspective. We sold a number of older portfolios identified by this process in the first quarter of 2006. We believe this process of constantly evaluating portfolio returns against costs of collection should continue to improve the balance between our new and old portfolios. We may engage in further sales in the fourth quarter of 2007 if we believe market conditions are acceptable and portfolio performance is not up to our expectations, but do not anticipate sales at the same levels as in the prior two years.

Our portfolios provide our principal long-term source of liquidity. Over time, we expect to convert our portfolios to cash in an amount that equals or exceeds the cost basis of our portfolios. In addition, some portfolios whose cost bases we have completely recovered will continue to return collections to us. The total fair value of our portfolios includes fair value attributable to the residual interests of third parties in collections once all funds (including funds invested by us) invested in a portfolio have been repaid (with interest) and all servicing fees have been paid. The retained fair value of our portfolios excludes fair value attributable to these residual interests. Our estimate of the total fair value of our portfolios at September 30, 2007, decreased $3.0 million to $19.0 million from $22.0 million at December 31, 2006. At the same time, the cost basis of our portfolios decreased to $3.7 million at September 30, 2007, from $5.0 million at December 31, 2006. Our estimate of the retained fair value of our portfolios at September 30, 2007, decreased $2.8 million to $18.5 million from $21.3 million at December 31, 2006. Correspondingly, our notes payable used to purchase portfolios decreased from $4.5 million at December 31, 2006 to $4.0 million at September 30, 2007. The decrease in the fair value can be due to factors such as the availability of new portfolios, market pricing conditions for new portfolios, the timing of loan repayments and residual interest payments to Varde, and the timing of distributions to our members.

Our estimates of fair value decreased due principally to our cash collections and portfolio sales of $9.2 million exceeding the fair value of the $2.6 million of new portfolio purchases in 2007. Our portfolio cost basis also decreased, due principally to the cost basis recovery associated with our collections and sales exceeding the $2.6 million of portfolio purchases made in the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Whether the fair value and cost basis of our portfolios will resume the growth we experienced in 2005 will depend on our ability to find portfolios at a reasonable price in a very competitive market. The purchase of portfolios is also limited by the amount of cash we have available to purchase portfolios. If we can find reasonably priced portfolios, we believe our portfolio fair value and cost basis will increase in the near term because we can use the Varde credit facility as well as reinvest some cash proceeds from collections to purchase new portfolios. Long-term growth in portfolio fair value and cost basis will depend on whether market conditions continue to permit us to purchase portfolios at reasonable prices and on our financial resources.

	Total Fair Value				Retained Fair Value				Fair Value of Residual Interests
	Sep 30, 2007		Dec 31, 2006		Sep 30, 2007		Dec 31, 2006		Sep 30, 2007		Dec 31, 2006
	($ in millions)				($ in millions)				($ in millions)

Higher collection risk (25% discount rate)	$	17.7	$	20.5	$	17.3	$	19.9	$	0.4	$	0.6
Assumed collection risk (20% discount rate)	$	19.0	$	22.0	$	18.5	$	21.3	$	0.5	$	0.7
Lower collection risk (15% discount rate)	$	20.5	$	23.8	$	20.0	$	23.0	$	0.5	$	0.8

We do not present the portion of fair value attributable to residual interests of third parties in collections as a liability in our financial statements, although it does represent a contingent obligation to make payments to a third party. Because we will receive a servicing fee and our share of residual collections, we believe collections of the specified portfolios will generate funds sufficient to pay these residual interests to third parties as they come due and cover our operating costs, with the potential for some profit on our part. If our collection efficiency declines significantly, however, we might have to use some of our own capital to cover operating costs as well as forego distributions to our investors as we had to do for the third quarter of 2007.

Beginning in April 2003, we began making quarterly distributions. During 2006, we made distributions totaling $664,000. We made a distribution of $161,000 in each of January 2007, April 2007 and July 2007 relating to quarters ended December 31, 2006, March 31, 2007, and June 30, 2007, respectively. In order to provide additional working capital necessary to run our business, however, our Board of Directors decided to forego payment of distributions to our members and interest holders for the three month period ending September 30, 2007. In an effort to rebuild our cash reserves to cover our operational expenses and continue purchasing new portfolios, we anticipate that distributions may be suspended or reduced until we are able to generate the profit called for in our business plan – to recover the cost we pay for our portfolios, repay funds borrowed to purchase portfolios, pay our collecting and operating costs and still have a profit.

Our agreement with Varde provides us with a source of capital to purchase new portfolios. The agreement provides up to $25 million of capital (counting each dollar loaned on a cumulative basis) over a five-year term. We will never have outstanding indebtedness approaching the full $25 million at any one time, due to the cumulative nature of the facility. At September 30, 2007, Matterhorn owed $3.9 million under the facility in connection with purchases of certain charged-off loan portfolios. Under the credit facility, Varde has a first priority security interest in Matterhorn’s assets. The assets of Matterhorn that provide security for Varde's loan were carried at a cost of $2.5 million at September 30, 2007. The loan advances have minimum payment threshold points with terms of up to three years and bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum. These obligations are scheduled to be repaid in full on dates ranging from December 2007 to June 2010. Once all funds (including those invested by us) invested in a portfolio financed by Varde have been repaid (with interest) and all servicing fees have been paid, Varde will begin to receive a residual interest in collections of that portfolio. Depending on the performance of the portfolio, these residual interests may never be paid, they may begin being paid a significant time later than Varde’s loan is repaid (i.e., after the funds invested by us are repaid with interest), or, in circumstances where the portfolio performs extremely well, the loan could be repaid early and Varde could conceivably begin to receive its residual interest on or before the date that the loan obligation was originally scheduled to be paid in full. The amount of remaining available credit under the facility at September 30, 2007 was $11.0 million. Matterhorn has borrowed a total of $14.0 million, with $3.9 million outstanding at September 30, 2007.

There can be no assurance that Varde will advance any new money under the facility, because in each instance Varde must approve of the portfolio(s) we propose to acquire and the terms of the acquisition. We do not have any plans to raise equity capital. Based on our cash position and current financial resources, we believe we have adequate capital resources to continue our business as presently conducted for the next twelve months. We plan to continue to use the Varde credit facility to maximize the return on our infrastructure and to continue to reduce variable costs required to collect each dollar of revenue. We have also taken steps, such as increased legal collections and third party collections arrangements, and will continue to consider other alternatives to increase the volume of accounts we service other than through new portfolio acquisitions using only our cash resources, however, if the economic returns to us seem reasonable.

The expenditures that we are making on our legal collections effort could continue into 2008, but should be at a lower level than 2007. We may from time to time acquire capital assets on an as needed basis. Our most significant capital assets are our dialer and our telephone switch, which we do not anticipate having to replace within the next year. We do not have any contractual commitments to make capital expenditures, and we have not budgeted any capital expenditures for the coming year.

In accordance with the Exchange Act, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Operations Officer and our Accounting Manager, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. In designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, may be detected. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Operations Officer and our Accounting Manager concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2007, to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

In the first half of 2007, we retained an outside consultant to conduct a study to determine whether we should continue using the cost recovery method of accounting for all of our portfolios or switch to a method that matches portfolio cost basis to revenue over the projected life of the portfolio. The accounting method used depends largely upon a determination of our ability to accurately project the timing and amount of collections for portfolios we acquire. The consultant found that we are capable of determining the amount of revenue a portfolio is expected to generate over its life for portfolios that we have sufficient historical data and experience to accurately estimate future cash flows. As a result of this finding and further analysis by our Audit Committee members and management, our Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, which approved, the adoption of the interest method of accounting to be applied to the majority of portfolios purchased after December 31, 2006. For those portfolios purchased on or before December 31, 2006 and for portfolios purchased after that date where we do not have sufficient historical data and experience to accurately estimate the timing of collections revenue over its life, we will use the cost recovery method.

We use our internally developed collection score model to project the remaining cash flows from our portfolios. Our collection score model considers known data about our accounts, including, among other things, our collection experience and changes in external market factors, in addition to all data known when we acquired the accounts. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be able to achieve the collections forecasted by our collection score model. If we are not able to achieve these levels of forecasted collection, our revenues will be reduced or we may be required to record an impairment charge, which could result in a reduction of our earnings.

We utilize the interest method to determine revenue recognized on most of our loan portfolios purchased after December 31, 2006. Under this method, each pool of portfolios is modeled based upon its projected cash flows. A yield is then established which, when applied to the outstanding balance of the loan portfolios, results in the recognition of revenue at a constant yield relative to the remaining balance in the static pool. The actual amount recovered by us on portfolios may substantially differ from our projections and may be lower than initially projected. If differences are material, we may take a write-off on all or a portion of our investment, which would negatively affect our earnings.

The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, or AICPA, SOP, 03-03, “Accounting for Loans or Certain Securities Acquired in a Transfer.” The SOP provides guidance on accounting for differences between contractual and expected cash flows from an investor’s initial investment in loans or debt securities acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. The SOP limits the revenue that may be accrued to the excess of the estimate of expected future cash flows over a portfolio’s initial cost basis. The SOP requires that the excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows not be recognized as an adjustment of revenue, expense, or on the balance sheet. The SOP freezes the internal rate of return (“IRR”) originally estimated when the loan portfolio pools are purchased for subsequent impairment testing. Rather than lower the estimated IRR if the expected future cash flow estimates are decreased, the carrying value of our loan portfolios would be written down to maintain the then-current IRR. Increases in expected future cash flows would be recognized prospectively through an upward adjustment of the IRR over a portfolio’s remaining life. Any increased yield then becomes the new benchmark for impairment testing. The SOP provides that previously issued annual financial statements do not need to be restated. Since the new SOP guidance does not permit yields to be lowered, it will increase the probability of our having to incur impairment charges in the future, which would negatively impact our profitability.

Exhibit Number	Description
2.1	Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization Proposed by Chapter 11 Trustee and the Official Committee of Equity Security Holders effective February 4, 2002 (1)

2.2	First Amended Disclosure Statement Describing Joint Chapter 11 Plan Proposed by Chapter 11 Trustee and the Official Committee of Equity Security Holders approved on October 12, 2001 (1)

3.1	Performance Capital Management, LLC Articles of Organization (1)

3.2	Operating Agreement for Performance Capital Management, LLC (1)

3.3	First Amendment to Operating Agreement for Performance Capital Management, LLC (1)

3.4	Second Amendment to Operating Agreement for Performance Capital Management, LLC (2)

3.5	Third Amendment to Operating Agreement for Performance Capital Management, LLC (3)

4.1	Specimen Performance Capital Management, LLC Unit Certificate (1)

4.2	Specimen Performance Capital Management, LLC Economic Interest Unit Certificate (1)

4.3	Provisions in the Operating Agreement for Performance Capital Management, LLC pertaining to the rights of LLC Unit holders (see Exhibits 3.2 and 3.3) (1)

10.1	Agreement of Employment by and between Performance Capital Management, LLC and David J. Caldwell dated July 11, 2007 (4)

10.2	Agreement of Employment by and between Performance Capital Management, LLC and Darren S. Bard dated July 11, 2007 (4)

10.3	Agreement of Employment by and between Performance Capital Management, LLC and William D. Constantino dated July 11, 2007 (4)

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 *

* The certifications filed under Exhibit 32.1 are not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Performance Capital Management, LLC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language contained in any such filing, except to the extent that Performance Capital Management, LLC specifically incorporates it by reference.

	California		03-0375751
	State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION		Page

Item 1	Consolidated Financial Statements

	Review Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	1

	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2007 (unaudited) and December 31, 2006	2

	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited)	3

	Consolidated Statements of Members’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31, 2006	4

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited)	5

	Condensed Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	6

Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17

Item 3	Controls and Procedures	27

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 5	Other Information	28

Item 6	Exhibits	29

SIGNATURES		30

	As of Sept. 30, 2007			As of Dec. 31, 2006

Unrecovered cost balance, beginning of period	$	5,059,283		$	8,505,065
Valuation allowance, beginning of period		(58,341	)		(58,341	)
Net balance, beginning of period		5,000,942			8,446,724
Net portfolio activity		(1,313,007	)		(3,445,782	)
Net balance, end of period	$	3,687,935		$	5,000,942

	For the quarter ended September 30, 2007		For the nine months ended September 30, 2007

Fair Value Date of Purchase	$	165	$	2,567

Forward Flow Allocation	$	216	$	3,158

For the Years Ended December 31,		Amortization
2007	(a)	$	184,471

2008		$	770,042

2009		$	381,617

2010		$	361,147

2011		$	421,970

2012		$	263,066

		$	2,382,313

	Performance Capital Management, LLC
	(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

	7001 Village Drive. Suite 255, Buena Park, California 90621
	(Address of principal executive offices)


	(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2007			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
Balance at the be beginning of the period	$	2,720,033		$	-
Income recognized on portfolios, net		(355,637	)		(455,257	)
Additions		539,926			3,359,579
Balance at the end of the period	$	2,904,322		$	2,904,322

	As of Sept. 30, 2007		As of Dec. 31, 2006
Office furniture and equipment	$	432,139	$	427,897
Computer equipment		659,491		630,159
Leasehold improvements		113,502		113,502
Totals		1,205,132		1,171,558
Less accumulated depreciation		816,089		741,439
Property and equipment, net	$	389,043	$	430,119

Year ending September 30,
2008	$	3,089,000
2009	$	432,000
2010	$	417,000

Year ending Sept 30	Approximate Annual Lease Commitments
2008	$ 345,000
2009	$ 346,000
2010	$ 355,000
2011	$ 355,000
2012	$ 360,000
Thereafter	$ 515,000

	PERFORMANCE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC



November 13, 2007	By:	/s/ David J. Caldwell
(Date)		Name: David J. Caldwell
		Its: Chief Operations Officer

	(714) 736-3780
	(Issuer's telephone number)