UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016

OR ( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number 000-50718

TACTICAL DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New York	13-4224248
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

c/o Ceres Managed Futures LLC

522 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10036

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(855) 672-4468

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X     No    

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of the chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes X     No    

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer         Accelerated filer _     Non-accelerated filer X     Smaller reporting company     

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes         No X

As of July 31, 2016, 184,146.7048 Limited Partnership Redeemable Units were outstanding.

TACTICAL DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

		Page
		Number
PART I -  Financial Information:
Item 1.	Financial Statements:
	Statements of Financial Condition at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (unaudited)	3
	Schedules of Investments at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (unaudited)	4–5
	Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)	6
	Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)	7–19
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	20–23
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	24–31
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	32
PART II - Other Information:
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	33-40
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	41
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	41
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	41
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	41
Item 5.	Other Information	41
Item 6.	Exhibits	42-44

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Statements of Financial Condition

(Unaudited)

	June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Assets:
Investment in the Funds(1), at fair value	$	167,570,516	$	210,548,183
Redemptions receivable from Fund		19,215,106		-
Cash at MS&Co.		345,443		425,263
Cash at bank		607		-
Total assets	$	187,131,672	$	210,973,446
Liabilities and Partners’ Capital:
Liabilities:
Accrued expenses:
Ongoing selling agent fees	$	311,886	$	351,622
Management fees		208,094		222,936
General Partner fees		155,448		175,255
Professional fees		282,582		315,729
Redemptions payable to Limited Partners		4,655,241		3,038,650
Total liabilities		5,613,251		4,104,192
Partners’ Capital:
General Partner, 2,477.6854 Redeemable Units outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015		2,372,670		2,431,723
Limited Partners, 187,074.8028 and 208,301.6758 Redeemable Units outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively		179,145,751		204,437,531
Total partners’ capital (net asset value)		181,518,421		206,869,254
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	$	187,131,672	$	210,973,446
Net asset value per Redeemable Unit	$	957.62	$	981.45

⁽¹⁾ Defined in Note 1.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

3

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund, L.P.

Schedule of Investments

June 30, 2016

(Unaudited)

Investment in the Funds	Fair Value		% of Partners’ Capital
CMF Willowbridge Master Fund L.P.	$	42,528,507		23.43	%
CMF Aspect Master Fund L.P.		28,959,741		15.96
CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P.		33,780,893		18.61
JEM Master Fund L.P.		7,672,812		4.23
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Boronia I, LLC		22,530,799		12.41
Cambridge Master Fund L.P.		32,097,764		17.68
Total investment in the Funds	$	167,570,516		92.32	%

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

4

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Schedule of Investments

December 31, 2015

Investment in the Funds	Fair value		% of Partners’ Capital
CMF Willowbridge Master Fund L.P.	$	47,827,925		23.12	%
CMF Aspect Master Fund L.P.		37,891,702		18.31
CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P.		38,390,905		18.56
CMF Altis Partners Master Fund L.P.		26,474,103		12.80
JEM Master Fund L.P.		6,784,895		3.28
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Boronia I, LLC		36,257,683		17.53
Cambridge Master Fund L.P.		16,920,970		8.18
Total investment in the Funds	$	210,548,183		101.78	%

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

5

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Investment Income:
Interest income allocated from the Funds	$	78,719	$	2,701	$	175,232	$	6,177
Expenses:
Expenses allocated from the Funds		685,016		1,108,711		1,261,421		2,508,079
Ongoing selling agent fees		943,888		1,157,040		1,988,126		2,471,049
General Partner fees		470,426		576,665		990,890		1,231,729
Management fees		627,926		692,657		1,297,188		1,490,122
Incentive fees		-		-		188,689		1,694,935
Professional fees		152,208		144,333		302,912		330,472
Total expenses		2,879,464		3,679,406		6,029,226		9,726,386
Net investment income (loss)		(2,800,745)		(3,676,705)		(5,853,994)		(9,720,209)
Trading Results:
Net gains (losses) on investment in the Funds:
Net realized gains (losses) on closed contracts allocated from the Funds		(4,446,348)		(19,196,489)		(1,372,984)		4,275,482
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts allocated from the Funds		3,114,467		(9,247,445)		2,485,845		(14,032,696)
Total trading results		(1,331,881)		(28,443,934)		1,112,861		(9,757,214)
Net income (loss)		(4,132,626)		(32,120,639)		(4,741,133)		(19,477,423)
Subscriptions — Limited Partners		-		1,125,500		-		1,209,286
Redemptions — Limited Partners		(10,894,701)		(8,565,476)		(20,609,700)		(21,192,422)
Redemptions — General Partner		-		-		-		(378,906)
Net increase (decrease) in Partners’ Capital		(15,027,327)		(39,560,615)		(25,350,833)		(39,839,465)
Partners’ Capital, beginning of period		196,545,748		252,826,136		206,869,254		253,104,986
Partners’ Capital, end of period	$	181,518,421	$	213,265,521	$	181,518,421	$	213,265,521
Net asset value per Redeemable Unit (189,552.4882 and 230,562.5282 Redeemable Units outstanding at June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively)	$	957.62	$	924.98	$	957.62	$	924.98
Net income (loss) per Redeemable Unit*	$	(20.14)	$	(135.94)	$	(23.83)	$	(85.11)
Weighted average Redeemable Units outstanding		197,767.0429		236,340.0892		202,821.7579		241,555.7795

* Represents the change in net asset value per Redeemable Unit during the period.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

6

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Organization:

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. (the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York on December 3, 2002 to engage, directly or indirectly, in the speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of commodity interests including futures, option, swap and forward contracts. The sectors traded include currencies, energy, grains, indices, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, livestock, lumber, metals and softs. The commodity interests that are traded by the Partnership indirectly through its investments in the Funds (as defined below) are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk. The General Partner (as defined below) may also determine to invest up to all of the Partnership’s assets in United States (“U.S.”) Treasury bills and/or money market mutual funds, including money market mutual funds, managed by Morgan Stanley or its affiliates.

Ceres Managed Futures LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, acts as the general partner (the “General Partner”) or with respect to Boronia Trading Company (defined below), the “Trading Manager” and commodity pool operator of the Partnership. The General Partner is wholly owned by Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC (“MSSB Holdings”). MSSB Holdings is ultimately owned by Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley is a publicly held company whose shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Morgan Stanley is engaged in various financial services and other businesses. Prior to June 28, 2013, Morgan Stanley indirectly owned a majority equity interest in MSSB Holdings and Citigroup Inc. indirectly owned a minority equity interest in MSSB Holdings. Prior to July 31, 2009, the date as of which MSSB Holdings became its owner, the General Partner was wholly owned by Citigroup Financial Products Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc., the sole owner of which is Citigroup Inc.

All trading decisions for the Partnership are made by Graham Capital Management, L.P., (“Graham”), Willowbridge Associates Inc. (“Willowbridge”), Aspect Capital Limited (“Aspect”), JE Moody & Company LLC (“JE Moody”), Boronia Capital Pty. Ltd. (“Boronia”), and The Cambridge Strategy (Asset Management) Limited (“Cambridge”) (each an “Advisor” and collectively, the “Advisors”), each of which is a registered commodity trading advisor. Effective June 30, 2016, Altis Partners (Jersey) Limited (“Altis”) ceased to act as a commodity trading adviser to the Partnership. Reference herein to “Advisors” may include, as relevant, Altis. Each Advisor is allocated a portion of the Partnership’s assets to manage. The Partnership invests the portion of its assets allocated to each of the Advisors indirectly through investments in the Funds.

Between March 27, 2003 (commencement of the public offering period) and April 30, 2003, 36,616 redeemable units of limited partnership interest in the Partnership (“Redeemable Units”) were sold at $1,000 per Redeemable Unit. The proceeds of the initial public offering were held in an escrow account until April 30, 2003, at which time they were turned over to the Partnership for trading. The Partnership was authorized to publicly offer 300,000 Redeemable Units during the initial public offering period. As of December 4, 2003, the Partnership was authorized to publicly offer an additional 700,000 Redeemable Units. As of October 7, 2004, the Partnership was authorized to publicly offer an additional 1,000,000 Redeemable Units. As of June 30, 2005, the Partnership was authorized to publicly offer Redeemable Units previously registered. The public offering of Redeemable Units terminated on November 30, 2008. The Partnership currently privately and continuously offers up to 200,000 Redeemable Units to qualified investors. There is no maximum number of Redeemable Units that may be sold by the Partnership.

During the reporting periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Partnership’s/Funds’ commodity broker was Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (“MS&Co.”), a registered futures commission merchant. The Partnership/Funds also deposit a portion of their cash in a non-trading account at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

7

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P. (“Graham Master”), CMF Aspect Master Fund L.P. (“Aspect Master”), CMF Willowbridge Master Fund L.P. (“Willowbridge Master”), CMF Altis Partners Master Fund L.P. (“Altis Master”), Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Boronia I, LLC (“Boronia I, LLC” or “Boronia Trading Company”), Cambridge Master Fund L.P. (“Cambridge Master”) and JEM Master Fund L.P. (“JEM Master”) entered into a futures brokerage account agreement with MS&Co. Graham Master, Aspect Master, Willowbridge Master, Altis Master, Boronia I, LLC, Cambridge Master and JEM Master are collectively referred to as the “Funds”. Graham Master, Aspect Master, Willowbridge Master, Boronia I, LLC and Cambridge Master have also entered into a foreign exchange prime brokerage agreement with MS&Co. The Partnership has also entered into a futures brokerage account agreement with MS&Co. The Partnership, through its investment in the Funds, pays MS&Co. (or will reimburse MS&Co. if previously paid) its allocable share of all trading fees for the clearing and, where applicable, execution of transactions as well as exchange, clearing, user, give-up, floor brokerage and National Futures Association fees (collectively, the “clearing fees”).

The Partnership has also entered into a selling agreement (as amended, the “Selling Agreement”) with Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC (doing business as Morgan Stanley Wealth Management) (“Morgan Stanley Wealth Management”). Pursuant to the Selling Agreement, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management receives a monthly ongoing selling agent fee equal to 2.0% per year of the Partnership’s adjusted month-end net assets. The ongoing selling agent fee received by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management is shared with the properly registered/exempted financial advisers of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management who sell Redeemable Units in the Partnership.

In July 2015, the General Partner delegated certain administrative functions to SS&C Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, currently doing business as SS&C GlobeOp (the “Administrator”). Pursuant to a master services agreement, the Administrator furnishes certain administrative, accounting, regulatory, reporting, tax and other services as agreed from time to time. In addition, the Administrator maintains certain books and records of the Partnership. The cost of retaining the Administrator is allocated among the pools operated by the General Partner, including the Partnership.

2. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

The accompanying financial statements and accompanying notes are unaudited but, in the opinion of the General Partner, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the Partnership’s financial condition at June 30, 2016, and the results of its operations and changes in partners’ capital for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. These financial statements present the results for interim periods and do not include all disclosures normally provided in annual financial statements. These financial statements should be read together with the financial statements and notes included in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for the year ended December 31, 2015. The December 31, 2015 information has been derived from the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Due to the nature of commodity trading, the results of operations for the interim periods presented should not be considered indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires the General Partner to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.

The General Partner and each limited partner of the Partnership share in the profits and losses of the Partnership in proportion to the amount of Partnership interest owned by each except that no limited partner shall be liable for obligations of the Partnership in excess of its capital contribution and profits, if any, net of distributions or redemptions and losses, if any.

Statement of Cash Flows. The Partnership is not required to provide a Statement of Cash Flows.

Partnership’s Investments. The Partnership carries its investments in the Funds at fair value based on the respective Fund’s net asset value per unit as calculated by the Funds or the Partnership’s (1) net contribution to the Funds and (2) its allocated share of the undistributed profits and losses, including realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses), of the Funds.

8

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Funds’ Investments. All commodity interests of the Funds, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments, are held for trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on the trade date and open contracts are recorded at fair value (as described in Note 5, “Fair Value Measurements”) at the measurement date. Investments in commodity interests denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing at the measurement date. Gains or losses are realized when contracts are liquidated and are determined using the first-in, first-out method. Unrealized gains or losses on open contracts are included as a component of equity in trading account in the Funds’ Statements of Financial Condition. Net realized gains or losses and net change in unrealized gains or losses from the preceding period are reported in the Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

Income Taxes. Income taxes have not been listed as each partner is individually liable for the taxes, if any, on its share of the Partnership’s income and expenses. The General Partner concluded that no provision for income tax is required in the Partnership’s financial statements. The Partnership files U.S. federal and various state and local tax returns. No income tax returns are currently under examination. The 2012 through 2015 tax years remain subject to examination by U.S. federal and most state tax authorities. The General Partner does not believe that there are any uncertain tax positions that require recognition of a tax liability.

Investment Company Status. Effective January 1, 2014, the Partnership adopted Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2013-08, “Financial Services — Investment Companies (Topic 946): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement and Disclosure Requirements” and based on the General Partner’s assessment, the Partnership has been deemed to be an investment company since inception. Accordingly, the Partnership follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of Topic 946 and reflects its investments at fair value with unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value reflected in the Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

Net Income (Loss) per Redeemable Unit. Net income (loss) per Redeemable Unit is calculated in accordance with ASU 946 “Financial Services-Investment Companies.” See Note 3, “Financial Highlights.”

Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The carrying value of the Partnership’s assets and liabilities presented in the Statements of Financial Condition that qualify as financial instruments under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 825, “Financial Instruments”, approximates the fair value due to the short term nature of such balances.

Recent Accounting Pronouncement. In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” The amendments in this update address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments for all entities that hold financial assets or owe financial liabilities. One of the amendments in this update eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet or a description of changes in the methods and significant assumptions. Additionally, the update eliminates the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities. Investment companies are specifically exempted from ASU 2016-01’s equity investment accounting provisions and will continue to follow the industry specific guidance for investment accounting under Topic 946. For public business entities, this update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein. For other entities, it is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The General Partner is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on the Partnership’s financial statements and related disclosures.

There have been no material changes with respect to the Partnership’s critical accounting policies as reported in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

9

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

3. Financial Highlights:

Financial highlights for the limited partner class as a whole for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Per Redeemable Unit Performance (for a unit outstanding throughout the period):*
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses)	$	(5.98)	$	(120.38)	$	5.03	$	(45.12)
Net investment loss		(14.16)		(15.56)		(28.86)		(39.99)
Increase (decrease) for the period		(20.14)		(135.94)		(23.83)		(85.11)
Net asset value per Redeemable Unit, beginning of period		977.76		1,060.92		981.45		1,010.09
Net asset value per Redeemable Unit, end of period	$	957.62	$	924.98	$	957.62	$	924.98

	Three Months Ended     June 30,						Six Months Ended     June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Ratios to Average Limited Partners’ Capital:**
Net investment loss***		(5.7)	%		(6.3)	%		(5.8)	%		(7.2)	%
Operating expenses		5.8	%		6.3	%		5.8	%		6.3	%
Incentive fees		0.1	%		-	%		0.2	%		0.9	%
Total expenses		5.9	%		6.3	%		6.0	%		7.2	%
Total return:
Total return before incentive fees		(2.0)	%		(12.8)	%		(2.2)	%		(7.5)	%
Incentive fees		(0.1)	%		-	%		(0.2)	%		(0.9)	%
Total return after incentive fees		(2.1)	%		(12.8)	%		(2.4)	%		(8.4)	%

* Net investment loss per Redeemable Unit is calculated by dividing the expenses net of interest income by the average number of Redeemable Units outstanding during the period. The net realized and unrealized gains (losses) per Redeemable Unit is a balancing amount necessary to reconcile the change in net asset value per Redeemable Unit with the other per unit information.

** Annualized (other than incentive fees, if applicable).

*** Interest income less total expenses.

The above ratios and total return may vary for individual investors based on the timing of capital transactions during the period. Additionally, these ratios are calculated for the limited partner class using the limited partners’ share of income, expenses and average partners’ capital of the Partnership and include the income and expenses allocated from the Funds.

10

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

4. Trading Activities:

The Partnership was formed for the purpose of trading contracts in a variety of commodity interests, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity interests. The Partnership invests substantially all of its assets through a “master/feeder” structure. The Partnership’s pro-rata share of the results of the Funds’ trading activities are shown on the Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

The futures brokerage account agreement with MS&Co. gives the Partnership and the Funds the legal right to net unrealized gains and losses on open futures and open forward contracts. The Partnership and the Funds net, for financial reporting purposes, the unrealized gains and losses on open futures and open forward contracts on the Statements of Financial Condition as the criteria under ASC 210-20, “Balance Sheet,” have been met.

All of the commodity interests owned by the Funds are held for trading purposes.

Trading and transaction fees are based on the number of trades executed by the Advisors for the Funds and the Partnership’s respective percentage ownership of each Fund. All clearing fees paid to MS&Co. are borne by the Funds and allocated to the Funds’ limited partners, including the Partnership.

There were no direct investments at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

5. Fair Value Measurements:

Funds’ Fair Value Measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to fair values derived from unobservable inputs (Level 3). The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

The fair value of exchange-traded futures, option and forward contracts is determined by the various exchanges, and reflects the settlement price for each contract as of the close of business on the last business day of the reporting period. The fair value of foreign currency forward contracts is extrapolated on a forward basis from the spot prices quoted as of approximately 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) on the last business day of the reporting period from various exchanges. The fair value of non-exchange-traded foreign currency option contracts is calculated by applying an industry standard model application for options valuation of foreign currency options, using as input the spot prices, interest rates, and option implied volatilities quoted as of approximately 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) on the last business day of the reporting period. U.S. Treasury bills are valued at the last available bid price received from independent pricing services as of the close of the last business day of the reporting period.

The Funds consider prices for exchange-traded commodity futures, forward, swap and option contracts to be based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1). The values of U.S. Treasury bills, non-exchange-traded forward, swap and certain option contracts for which market quotations are not readily available are priced by broker quotes or pricing services that derive fair values for those assets and liabilities from observable inputs (Level 2). As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 and for the periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Funds did not hold any derivative instruments that were priced at fair value using unobservable inputs through the application of the General Partner’s assumptions and internal valuation pricing models (Level 3). Transfers between levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. During the reporting periods, there were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2.

11

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

6. Investment in the Funds:

On March 1, 2005, the assets allocated to Aspect for trading were invested in Aspect Master, a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York. The Partnership purchased 131,340.8450 units of Aspect Master with cash equal to $122,786,448 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forward contracts with a fair value of $8,554,397. Aspect Master permits accounts managed by Aspect using the Diversified Program, a proprietary, systematic trading system, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of Aspect Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Aspect, including the Partnership, are permitted to be limited partners of Aspect Master. The General Partner and Aspect believe that trading through this structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process.

On July 1, 2005, the assets allocated to Willowbridge for trading were invested in Willowbridge Master (formerly CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.), a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York. The Partnership purchased 95,795.8082 units of Willowbridge Master with cash equal to $85,442,868 and a contribution of open commodity futures and forward contracts with a fair value of $10,352,940. Willowbridge Master permits accounts managed by Willowbridge using its wPraxis Futures Trading Approach, a proprietary, discretionary trading system, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of Willowbridge Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Willowbridge, including the Partnership, are permitted to be limited partners of Willowbridge Master. The General Partner and Willowbridge believe that trading through this structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process. The General Partner and Willowbridge have agreed that Willowbridge will trade the assets allocated to Willowbridge at a level up to 3 times the amount of assets allocated. Prior to January 1, 2013, Willowbridge traded the Partnership’s assets pursuant to its Argo Trading System.

On June 1, 2006, the assets allocated to Graham for trading were invested in Graham Master, a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York. The Partnership purchased 101,486.0491 units of Graham Master with cash equal to $103,008,482. Graham Master permits accounts managed by Graham using the K4D-15V Program, a proprietary, systematic trading system, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of Graham Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Graham, including the Partnership, are permitted to be limited partners of Graham Master. The General Partner and Graham believe that trading through this structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process.

On May 1, 2011, the assets allocated to Altis for trading were invested in Altis Master, a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of New York. The Partnership purchased 21,851.9469 units of Altis Master with cash equal to $70,000,000. Altis Master permits commodity pools managed now and in the future by Altis using the Global Futures Portfolio Program, a proprietary, systematic trading system, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The Partnership fully redeemed its investment in Altis Master on June 30, 2016 for cash equal to $19,215,106.

On January 1, 2013, the assets allocated to Boronia for trading were invested in Boronia I, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the limited liability company laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership purchased an interest in Boronia I, LLC with cash equal to $36,000,000. Boronia I, LLC permits accounts managed by Boronia using the Boronia Diversified Program, a proprietary, systematic trading system, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the trading manager of Boronia I, LLC. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Boronia, including the Partnership, are permitted to be members of Boronia I, LLC. The Trading Manager and Boronia believe that trading through this structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process. The Trading Manager and Boronia agreed that Boronia will trade the Partnership’s assets allocated to Boronia at a level up to 1.5 times the amount of assets allocated.

On August 1, 2013, the assets allocated to JE Moody for trading were invested in JEM Master, a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership purchased 11,968.0895 units of JEM Master with cash equal to $15,820,000. JEM Master permits accounts managed by JE Moody using the JEM Commodity Relative Value Program, a proprietary, systematic trading program, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of JEM Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by JE Moody, including the Partnership, are permitted to be limited partners of JEM Master. The General Partner and JE Moody believe that trading through this structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process. The General Partner and JE Moody agreed that JE Moody will trade the Partnership’s assets allocated to JE Moody at a level that is up to 3 times the amount of assets allocated.

12

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On December 1, 2015, the assets allocated to Cambridge for trading were invested in Cambridge Master, a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of Delaware. The Partnership purchased an interest in Cambridge Master with cash equal to $17,000,000. Cambridge Master permits accounts managed by Cambridge using the Asian Markets Alpha Programme and the Emerging Markets Alpha Programme, each a proprietary, systematic trading program, to invest together in one trading vehicle. The General Partner is also the general partner of Cambridge Master. Individual and pooled accounts currently managed by Cambridge, including the Partnership, are permitted to be limited partners of Cambridge Master. The General Partner and Cambridge believe that trading through this structure should promote efficiency and economy in the trading process. The General Partner and Cambridge agreed that Cambridge will trade the Partnership’s assets allocated to Cambridge at a level that is up to 1.5 times the amount of assets allocated. The amount of leverage may be increased or decreased in the future. However, in no event will the amount of leverage be greater than 2 times the amount of assets allocated.

The General Partner is not aware of any material changes to the trading programs discussed above during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2016.

The Funds’ trading of futures, forward and option contracts, if applicable, on commodities is done primarily on U.S. and foreign commodity exchanges. The Funds engage in such trading through commodity brokerage accounts maintained with MS&Co.

Generally, a limited partner/member in the Funds withdraws all or part of its capital contribution and undistributed profits, if any, from the Funds as of the end of any month (the “Redemption Date”) after a request has been made to the General Partner/Trading Manager at least three days in advance of the Redemption Date. Such withdrawals are classified as a liability when the limited partner/member elects to redeem and informs the Funds. However, a limited partner/member may request a withdrawal as of the end of any day if such request is received by the General Partner/Trading Manager at least three days in advance of the proposed withdrawal day.

Management fees, General Partner fees, ongoing selling agent fees and incentive fees are charged at the Partnership level, except for management and incentive fees payable to Boronia which are charged at the Boronia Trading Company level. All clearing fees are borne by the Funds and allocated to the Funds’ limited partners, including the Partnership. Professional fees (formerly, other expenses) are borne by the Funds and allocated to the Partnership, and also charged directly at the Partnership level.

As of June 30, 2016, the Partnership owned approximately 10.9% of Willowbridge Master, 50.5% of Aspect Master, 72.7% of Graham Master, 64.1% of JEM Master, 40.6% of Boronia I, LLC and 41.6% of Cambridge Master. At December 31, 2015, the Partnership owned approximately 13.7% of Willowbridge Master, 55.3% of Aspect Master, 72.7% of Graham Master, 59.7% of Altis Master, 61.0% of JEM Master, 48.8% of Boronia I, LLC and 28.3% of Cambridge Master. It is the Partnership’s intention to continue to invest in the Funds. The performance of the Partnership is directly affected by the performance of the Funds. Expenses to investors as a result of investment in the Funds are approximately the same as they would be if the Partnership traded directly and the redemption rights are not affected.

13

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Summarized information reflecting the total assets, liabilities and partners’/members’ capital of the Funds is shown in the following tables.

	June 30, 2016
	Total Assets		Total Liabilities		Total Capital
Willowbridge Master	$	390,739,775	$	1,675,338	$	389,064,437
Aspect Master		57,339,968		40,072		57,299,896
Graham Master		46,506,995		22,536		46,484,459
Altis Master		34,512,885		34,512,885		-
JEM Master		12,403,217		433,642		11,969,575
Boronia I, LLC		56,276,939		720,449		55,556,490
Cambridge Master		97,750,214		20,560,073		77,190,141
	December 31, 2015
	Total Assets		Total Liabilities		Total Capital
Willowbridge Master	$	366,002,932	$	17,302,983	$	348,699,949
Aspect Master		68,986,804		521,227		68,465,577
Graham Master		52,819,144		17,985		52,801,159
Altis Master		44,778,165		463,886		44,314,279
JEM Master		11,192,959		67,453		11,125,506
Boronia I, LLC		74,378,857		119,223		74,259,634
Cambridge Master		73,013,433		13,303,511		59,709,922

14

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Summarized information reflecting the net investment income (loss), total trading results and net income (loss) of the Funds is shown in the following tables.

	For the three months ended June 30, 2016
	Net Investment     Income (Loss)		Total Trading     Results		Net Income (Loss)
Willowbridge Master	$	(74,889)	$	(8,464,297)	$	(8,539,186)
Aspect Master		(29,293)		(934,276)		(963,569)
Graham Master		(24,319)		1,248,149		1,223,830
Altis Master		(97,959)		(2,266,823)		(2,364,782)
JEM Master		(124,117)		(826,843)		(950,960)
Boronia I, LLC		(1,082,633)		4,790,599		3,707,966
Cambridge Master		(2,337)		(2,101,071)		(2,103,408)
	For the six months ended June 30, 2016
	Net Investment     Income (Loss)		Total Trading     Results		Net Income (Loss)
Willowbridge Master	$	(184,455)	$	(10,557,807)	$	(10,742,262)
Aspect Master		(54,116)		527,474		473,358
Graham Master		(51,696)		(345,784)		(397,480)
Altis Master		(150,778)		(5,588,130)		(5,738,908)
JEM Master		(268,754)		(1,106,840)		(1,375,594)
Boronia I, LLC		(1,773,815)		11,497,535		9,723,720
Cambridge Master		7,573		2,578,583		2,586,156
	For the three months ended June 30, 2015
	Net Investment     Income (Loss)		Total Trading     Results		Net Income (Loss)
Willowbridge Master	$	(213,266)	$	(24,855,443)	$	(25,068,709)
Aspect Master		(66,963)		(10,562,657)		(10,629,620)
Graham Master		(51,528)		(2,277,353)		(2,328,881)
Altis Master		(72,470)		(7,143,941)		(7,216,411)
JEM Master		(262,052)		(1,476,708)		(1,738,760)
Boronia I, LLC		(1,524,289)		(22,450,025)		(23,974,314)
	For the six months ended June 30, 2015
	Net Investment     Income (Loss)		Total Trading     Results		Net Income (Loss)
Willowbridge Master	$	(490,804)	$	(13,622,175)	$	(14,112,979)
Aspect Master		(126,673)		(2,375,011)		(2,501,684)
Graham Master		(108,870)		3,253,297		3,144,427
Altis Master		(143,062)		(1,926,039)		(2,069,101)
JEM Master		(518,939)		1,019,109		500,170
Boronia I, LLC		(3,589,857)		(16,761,597)		(20,351,454)

15

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Summarized information reflecting the Partnership’s investment in, and the Partnership’s pro rata share of the results of operations of the Funds is shown in the following tables.

	June 30, 2016					For the three months ended June 30, 2016
	% of Partners’ Capital								Expenses								Net Income (Loss)
Funds				Fair Value		Income (Loss)			Clearing Fees		Professional Fees		Management Fee		Incentive Fee				Investment Objective	Redemptions Permitted
Willowbridge Master		23.43	%	$	42,528,507	$	(914,597)		$	26,206	$	2,271	$	-	$	-	$	(943,074)	Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Aspect Master		15.96%			28,959,741		(518,356)			15,819		10,599		-		-		(544,774)	Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Graham Master		18.61%			33,780,893		940,588			18,296		14,787		-		-		907,505	Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Altis Master		0.00%			-		(1,334,205)			46,156		18,898		-		-		(1,399,259)	Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
JEM Master		4.23%			7,672,812		(523,311)			69,020		13,043		-		-		(605,374)	Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Boronia I, LLC		12.41%			22,530,799		1,956,851			131,114		19,518		83,303		199,853		1,523,063	Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Cambridge Master		17.68%			32,097,764		(860,132)			7,627		8,506		-		-		(876,265)	Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Total				$	167,570,516	$	(1,253,162)		$	314,238	$	87,622	$	83,303	$	199,853	$	(1,938,178)
	June 30, 2016					For the six months ended June 30, 2016
	% of Partners’ Capital								Expenses								Net Income (Loss)
Funds				Fair Value		Income (Loss)			Clearing Fees		Professional Fees		Management Fee		Incentive Fee				Investment Objective	Redemptions Permitted
Willowbridge Master		23.43	%	$	42,528,507	$	(1,109,745	)	$	62,603	$	4,786	$	-	$	-	$	(1,177,134)	Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Aspect Master		15.96%			28,959,741		391,483			31,568		21,578		-		-		338,337	Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Graham Master		18.61%			33,780,893		(172,195)			36,465		29,576		-		-		(238,236)	Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Altis Master		0.00%			-		(3,222,037)			77,805		30,569		-		-		(3,330,411)	Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
JEM Master		4.23%			7,672,812		(691,425)			148,763		25,688		-		-		(865,876)	Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Boronia I, LLC		12.41%			22,530,799		5,170,442			296,423		46,459		198,385		220,099		4,409,076	Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Cambridge Master		17.68%			32,097,764		921,570			14,467		16,187		-		-		890,916	Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Total				$	167,570,516	$	1,288,093		$	668,094	$	174,843	$	198,385	$	220,099	$	26,672

16

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

	December 31, 2015					For the three months ended June 30, 2015
	% of Partners’ Capital							Expenses								Net Income (Loss)
Funds				Fair Value		Income (Loss)		Clearing Fees		Professional Fees		Management Fee		Incentive Fee				Investment Objective		Redemptions Permitted
Willowbridge Master		23.12	%	$	47,827,925	$	(4,112,272)	$	32,017	$	3,729	$	-	$	-	$	(4,148,018)		Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Aspect Master		18.31	%		37,891,702		(5,881,665)		21,831		15,940		-		-		(5,919,436)		Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Graham Master		18.56	%		38,390,905		(1,655,962)		21,091		16,832		-		-		(1,693,885)		Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Altis Master		12.80	%		26,474,103		(4,492,409)		30,502		15,719		-		-		(4,538,630)		Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
JEM Master		3.28	%		6,784,895		(953,717)		155,066		14,818		-		-		(1,123,601)		Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Boronia I, LLC		17.53	%		36,257,683		(11,345,208)		501,582		52,894		226,690		-		(12,126,374)		Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Cambridge Master		8.18	%		16,920,970		-		-		-		-		-		-		Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Total				$	210,548,183	$	(28,441,233)	$	762,089	$	119,932	$	226,690	$	-	$	(29,549,944)
	December 31, 2015					For the six months ended June 30, 2015
	% of Partners’ Capital							Expenses								Net Income (Loss)
Funds				Fair Value		Income (Loss)		Clearing Fees		Professional Fees		Management Fee		Incentive Fee				Investment Objective		Redemptions Permitted
Willowbridge Master		23.12	%	$	47,827,925	$	(2,031,753)	$	78,135	$	9,716	$	-	$	-	$	(2,119,604)		Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Aspect Master		18.31	%		37,891,702		(1,356,743)		40,418		31,313		-		-		(1,428,474)		Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Graham Master		18.56	%		38,390,905		2,259,375		42,560		36,675		-		-		2,180,140		Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Altis Master		12.80	%		26,474,103		(979,593)		57,983		35,835		-		-		(1,073,411)		Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
JEM Master		3.28	%		6,784,895		828,564		308,677		34,721		-		-		485,166		Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Boronia I, LLC		17.53	%		36,257,683		(8,470,887)		812,885		106,570		456,731		455,860		(10,302,933)		Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Cambridge Master		8.18	%		16,920,970		-		-		-		-		-		-		Commodity Portfolio		Monthly
Total				$	210,548,183	$	(9,751,037)	$	1,340,658	$	254,830	$	456,731	$	455,860	$	(12,259,116)

17

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

7. Financial Instrument Risks:

In the normal course of business, the Partnership, indirectly through its investments in the Funds, is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. These financial instruments may include forward, futures, option and swap contracts, whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index, or reference rate, and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash balances, to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specific terms at specified future dates, or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange, a swap execution facility or over-the-counter (“OTC”). Exchange-traded instruments include futures and certain standardized forward, swap and option contracts. Specific market movements of commodities or futures contracts underlying an option cannot accurately be predicted. The purchaser of an option may lose the entire premium paid for the option. Certain swap contracts may also be traded on a swap execution facility or OTC. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and also include certain forward, swap and option contracts. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments, including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange-traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract. The General Partner estimates that at any given time approximately 48.5% to 71.4% of the Funds’ contracts are traded OTC.

Futures Contracts. The Funds trade futures contracts. A futures contract is a firm commitment to buy or sell a specified quantity of investments, currency or a standardized amount of a deliverable grade commodity, at a specified price on a specified future date, unless the contract is closed before the delivery date or if the delivery quantity is something where physical delivery cannot occur (such as the S&P 500 Index), whereby such contract is settled in cash. Payments (“variation margin”) may be made or received by the Funds each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Funds. When the contract is closed, the Funds record a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Transactions in futures contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the futures broker, directly with the exchange on which the contracts are traded. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on futures contracts are included in the Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

Forward Foreign Currency Contracts. Forward foreign currency contracts are those contracts where the Funds agree to receive or deliver a fixed quantity of foreign currency for an agreed-upon price on an agreed upon future date. Forward foreign currency contracts are valued daily, and the Funds’ net equity therein, representing unrealized gain or loss on the contracts as measured by the difference between the forward foreign exchange rates at the dates of entry into the contracts and the forward rates at the reporting date, is included in the Funds’ Statements of Financial Condition. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on forward foreign currency contracts are recognized in the period in which the contract is closed or the changes occur, respectively, and are included in the Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

London Metals Exchange Forward Contracts. Metal contracts traded on the London Metals Exchange (“LME”) represent a firm commitment to buy or sell a specified quantity of aluminum, copper, lead, nickel, tin or zinc. LME contracts traded by the Funds are cash settled based on prompt dates published by the LME. Payments (“variation margin”) may be made or received by the Funds each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Funds. A contract is considered offset when all long positions have been matched with a like number of short positions settling on the same prompt date. When the contract is closed at the prompt date, the Funds record a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Transactions in LME contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the broker, directly with the LME. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on metal contracts are included in the Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

18

Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Options. The Funds may purchase and write (sell) both exchange-listed and OTC options on commodities or financial instruments. An option is a contract allowing, but not requiring, its holder to buy (call) or sell (put) a specific or standard commodity or financial instrument at a specified price during a specified time period. The option premium is the total price paid or received for the option contract. When a Fund writes an option, the premium received is recorded as a liability in the Fund’s Statements of Financial Condition and marked to market daily. When a Fund purchases an option, the premium paid is recorded as an asset in the Fund’s Statements of Financial Condition and marked to market daily. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on option contracts are included in the Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

The Funds do not isolate that portion of the results of operations arising from the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from fluctuations from changes in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in total trading results in the Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

The risk to the limited partners that have purchased Redeemable Units is limited to the amount of their share of the Partnership’s net assets and undistributed profits. This limited liability is a result of the organization of the Partnership as a limited partnership under New York law.

Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial instruments traded by the Funds due to market changes, including interest and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity or security prices. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded. The Funds are exposed to a market risk equal to the value of futures and forward contracts purchased and unlimited liability on such contracts sold short.

Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. The Partnership’s/Funds’ risk of loss in the event of a counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized in the Statements of Financial Condition and is not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The Partnership’s/Funds’ risk of loss is reduced through the use of legally enforceable master netting agreements with counterparties that permit the Partnership/Funds to offset unrealized gains and losses and other assets and liabilities with such counterparties upon the occurrence of certain events. The Partnership/Funds have credit risk and concentration risk, as MS&Co. or an MS&Co. affiliate is the sole counterparty or broker with respect to the Partnership’s/Funds’ assets. Credit risk with respect to exchange-traded instruments is reduced to the extent that, through MS&Co. or an MS&Co. affiliate, the Partnership’s/Funds’ counterparty is an exchange or clearing organization.

As both a buyer and seller of options, a Fund pays or receives a premium at the outset and then bears the risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the contract underlying the option. Written options expose the Funds to potentially unlimited liability; for purchased options, the risk of loss is limited to the premiums paid. Certain written put options permit cash settlement and do not require the option holder to own the reference asset. The Funds do not consider these contracts to be guarantees.

The General Partner monitors and attempts to control the Partnership’s/Funds’ risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems and, accordingly, believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Partnership/Funds may be subject. These monitoring systems generally allow the General Partner to statistically analyze actual trading results with risk-adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, online monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forward and option contracts by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions.

The majority of these financial instruments mature within one year of the inception date. However, due to the nature of the Funds’ business, these instruments may not be held to maturity.

8. Subsequent Events:

The General Partner evaluates events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. The General Partner has assessed the subsequent events through the date of issuance and has determined that, other than that described below, there were no subsequent events requiring adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements.

Effective August 1, 2016, a portion of the Partnership’s assets were allocated to International Standard Asset Management (“ISAM”), which will be managed and traded by ISAM (USA) LLC and ISAM (Europe) LLP pursuant to the ISAM Systematic Trend Programme.

19

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Partnership does not engage in the sale of goods or services. The Partnership’s assets are its (i) investment in the Funds; (ii) cash at MS&Co. and (iii) cash at bank. Because of the low margin deposits normally required in commodity futures trading, relatively small price movements may result in substantial losses to the Partnership, through its investment in the Funds. While substantial losses could lead to a material decrease in liquidity, no such illiquidity occurred during the second quarter of 2016.

The Partnership’s capital consists of the capital contributions of the partners as increased or decreased by gains or losses on trading and by subscriptions, expenses, interest income, redemptions of Redeemable Units and distributions of profits, if any.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Partnership’s capital decreased 12.3% from $206,869,254 to $181,518,421. This decrease was attributable to redemptions of 21,226.8730 Redeemable Units resulting in an outflow of $20,609,700, coupled with the net loss of $4,741,133. Future redemptions could impact the amount of funds available for investment in the funds in subsequent periods.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the General Partner to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. The General Partner believes that the estimates and assumptions utilized in preparing the financial statements are reasonable. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Partnership’s/Funds’ significant accounting policies are described in detail in Note 2 of the Financial Statements.

The Partnership records all investments at fair value in its financial statements, with changes in fair value reported as a component of net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) in the Statements of Income and Expenses and Changes in Partners’ Capital.

Results of Operations

During the second quarter of 2016, the Partnership’s net asset value per Redeemable Unit decreased 2.1% from $977.76 to $957.62 as compared to a decreased of 12.8% in the same period of 2015. The Partnership experienced a net trading loss before fees and expenses in the second quarter of 2016 of $1,331,881. Losses were primarily attributable to the Funds’ trading in energy, global stock index, metals, and currency markets and were partially offset by gains in global interest rate and agricultural markets. The Partnership experienced a net trading loss before fees and expenses in the second quarter of 2015 of $28,443,934. Losses were primarily attributable to the Funds’ trading in currencies, energy, indices, livestock, metals, softs, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates and grains.

The most significant losses were incurred within the energy markets during April from short positions in crude oil and its related products as prices surged as data from the Energy Information Agency showed U.S. crude oil production continued to decline. Additional losses within the energy complex were recorded during April from positions in natural gas futures. Within the global stock index sector, losses were experienced during April and May from short positions in European and Asian equity index futures as prices trended higher boosted by a rally in commodity prices and a stronger overall outlook for the global economy. Losses were experienced within the metals markets, primarily during May, from long positions in gold and silver futures as a strengthening U.S. dollar diminished investor demand for precious metals. Within the currency markets, losses were incurred during May from long positions in the Japanese yen and New Zealand dollar versus the U.S. dollar as the relative value of the U.S. currency moved higher as the outlook for a potential June interest rate increase by the U.S. Federal Reserve looked increasingly likely. A portion of the Partnership’s losses for the quarter was offset by gains achieved within the global interest rate sector during June from long positions in European and U.S. fixed income futures as prices advanced as uncertainty surrounding the economic and political fallout following the U.K.’s vote in late June to leave the European Union increased demand for the relative “safety” of government debt. Additional gains were recorded during June within the agricultural sector from long positions in sugar and coffee futures as extreme weather conditions in Argentina and Brazil threatened South American crop harvests.

20

During the Partnership’s six months ended June 30, 2016, the net asset value per Redeemable Unit decreased 2.4% from $981.45 to $957.62 as compared to a decreased 8.4% in the same period of 2015. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before fees and expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2016 of $1,112,861. Gains were primarily attributable to the Funds’ trading in global interest rate and currency markets and were partially offset by losses in the metals, energies, agricultural, and global stock index sectors. The Partnership experienced a net trading loss before fees and expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2015 of $9,757,214. Losses were primarily attributable to the Funds’ trading in energy, metals, grains, livestock, indices and U.S. interest rates and were partially offset by gains in currencies, softs and non-U.S. interest rates.

The most significant losses were incurred within the metals markets during May from long positions in gold and silver futures as a strengthening U.S. dollar diminished investor demand for precious metals. Additional metals losses were experienced during February from short positions in zinc and copper futures as prices advanced in anticipation of stimulus measures from the People’s Bank of China bolstering China’s manufacturing sector. Within the energy complex losses were recorded during April from short positions in crude oil and its related products as prices surged as data from the Energy Information Agency showed U.S. crude oil production continued to decline. During March and April, losses were incurred within the energies from natural gas positions. Within the agricultural markets, losses were experienced during March from short positions in coffee and sugar futures as prices advanced on news that El Nino weather patterns brought dry conditions and exacerbated the spread of plant disease in South America. Losses within the agricultural markets were also recorded during January from long positions in cocoa futures as prices tumbled as funds cut bets on higher prices amid signs African crops were recovering from a five-year low. Within the global stock index markets, losses were recorded during June from long positions in U.S. and European equity index futures as prices declined on mounting uncertainties following the U.K’s decision to leave the European Union. Additional losses in this sector were recorded from March through May as a rebound in global equity prices adversely impacted the Partnership’s short positions. The Partnership’s losses for the first six months of the year were offset by gains achieved within the global interest rate markets during January and February from long positions in European fixed income futures as prices rallied after European Central Bank (the “ECB”) head Mario Draghi said the ECB’s Governing Council would review its stimulus policy as the region’s inflation rate fell below zero. Additional gains in the global interest rate sector were recorded during June from positions in European and U.S. fixed income futures. Within the currency sector, gains were recorded during January from short positions in the British pound versus the U.S. dollar as the relative value of the British pound declined as U.K. manufacturing and services data signaled the U.K.’s domestic economy was faltering and may result in the Bank of England keeping its benchmark interest rate unchanged.

21

Commodity markets are highly volatile. Broad price fluctuations and rapid inflation increase the risks involved in commodity trading, but also increases the possibility of profit. The profitability of the Funds depends on the existence of major price trends and the ability of the Advisors to correctly identify those price trends. Price trends are influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand relationships, weather, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. To the extent that market trends exist and the Advisors are able to identify them, the Funds expect to increase capital through operations.

Interest income on 80% of the average daily equity maintained in cash in the Partnership’s (or the Partnership’s allocable portion of a Fund’s, other than Boronia I, LLC) brokerage account is earned at a rate equal to the monthly average of the 4-week U.S. Treasury bill discount rate. MS&Co. credits Boronia I, LLC on 100% of the average daily equity maintained in cash in the account of Boronia I, LLC during each month at the rate equal to the monthly average of the 4-week U.S. Treasury bill discount rate less 0.15% during such month but in no event less than zero. When the effective rate is less than zero, no interest is earned. Any interest earned on the Partnership’s and/or each Fund’s account in excess of the amounts described above, if any, will be retained by MS&Co. and/or shared with the General Partner. All interest accrued on U.S. Treasury bills and money market mutual fund securities will be retained by the Partnership and/or the Funds, as applicable. Interest income earned for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 increased by $76,018 and $169,055, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015. The increase in interest income is primarily due to higher 4-week U.S. Treasury bill discount rates along with additional interest income earned on U.S. Treasury bills during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015. Interest earned by the Partnership will increase the net asset value of the Partnership. The amount of interest income earned by the Partnership depends on (1) the average daily equity in the Partnership’s and the Funds’ accounts, (2) the amount of Treasury bills and/or money market mutual funds purchased by the Partnership and the Funds and (3) interest rates over which neither the Partnership/the Funds nor MS&Co. has control.

Certain clearing fees are based on the number of trades executed by the Advisors for the Partnership/Funds. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the number of trades executed during the period. Clearing fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 decreased by $447,851 and $672,564, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015. The decrease in clearing fees is primarily due to a decrease in the number of trades during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015.

Ongoing selling agent fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net asset value on the last day of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. Ongoing selling agent fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 decreased by $213,152 and $482,923, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015. The decrease in ongoing selling agent fees is due to a decrease in average net assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015.

General Partner fees are paid to the General Partner for administering the business and affairs of the Partnership. General Partner fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net asset value as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. General Partner fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 decreased by $106,239 and $240,839, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015. The decrease in General Partner fees is primarily due to a decrease in average net assets during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015.

Management fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net asset value as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. Management fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 decreased by $208,118 and $451,280, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015. The decrease in management fees is due to a decrease in average net assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2015.

Incentive fees are based on the new trading profits generated by each Advisor at the end of the quarter as defined in the respective management agreements between the Partnership, the General Partner and each Advisor. Trading performance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 resulted in incentive fees of $199,853 and $408,788, respectively. Trading performance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 resulted in incentive fees of $0 and $2,150,795, respectively. To the extent an Advisor incurs a loss for the Partnership, the Advisor will not be paid incentive fees until such Advisor recovers any net loss incurred by the Advisor and earns additional new trading profits for the Partnership.

In allocating the assets of the Partnership among the Advisors, the General Partner considers, among other factors, past performance, trading style, volatility of markets traded and fee requirements. The General Partner may modify or terminate the allocation of assets among the Advisors and may allocate assets to additional advisors at any time.

22

As of June 30, 2016 and March 31, 2016, the Partnership’s assets were allocated among the trading Advisors in the following approximate percentages:

Advisor	June 30, 2016					March 31, 2016
Willowbridge Associates Inc.		23	%	$	42,388,956		23	%	$	44,162,992
Aspect Capital Limited		16	%	$	28,876,977		15	%	$	29,763,778
Graham Capital Management, L.P.		19	%	$	33,665,870		16	%	$	32,170,602
Altis Partners (Jersey) Limited		8	%	$	14,513,940		12	%	$	23,672,958
J E Moody & Company LLC.		4	%	$	7,639,882		5	%	$	9,403,440
Boronia Capital Pty. Ltd.		12	%	$	22,466,084		12	%	$	24,138,561
Cambridge Master Fund L.P.		18	%	$	31,966,712		17	%	$	33,233,417

23

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Partnership/Funds are speculative commodity pools. The market sensitive instruments held by them are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or substantially all of the Partnership’s/Funds’ assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Partnership’s/Funds’ main line of business.

The limited partners will not be liable for losses exceeding the current net asset value of their investment.

Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Partnership’s/Funds’ open positions and, consequently, in their earnings and cash balances. The Partnership’s/Funds’ market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Partnership’s/Funds’ open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which they trade.

The Partnership/Funds rapidly acquire and liquidate both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Partnership’s/Funds’ past performance are not necessarily indicative of their future results.

“Value at Risk” is a measure of the maximum amount which the Partnership/Funds could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Partnership’s/Funds’ speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Funds of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Partnership’s/Funds’ experience to date (i.e., “risk of ruin”). In light of the foregoing as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Partnership’s/Funds’ losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Partnership’s/Funds’ attempts to manage their market risk.

Exchange margin requirements have been used by the Partnership/Funds as the measure of their Value at Risk. Margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95%-99% of any one-day interval. The margin levels are established by dealers and exchanges using historical price studies as well as an assessment of current market volatility (including the implied volatility of the options on a given futures contract) and economic fundamentals to provide a probabilistic estimate of the maximum expected near-term one-day price fluctuation.

Value at Risk tables represent a probabilistic assessment of the risk of loss in market risk sensitive instruments. The Advisors currently trade the Partnership’s assets indirectly in master fund managed accounts established in the name of the Funds over which they have been granted limited authority to make trading decisions. The first two trading Value at Risk tables reflect the market sensitive instruments held by the Partnership indirectly, through its investment in the Funds. The remaining trading Value at Risk tables reflect the market sensitive instruments held by each Fund separately. There have been no material changes in the trading Value at Risk information previously disclosed in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

The following tables indicate the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership’s open positions by market category, through its investment in the Funds, as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. As of June 30, 2016, the Partnership’s total capitalization was $181,518,421.

	June 30, 2016
			% of Total
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization
Commodities	$	3,521,152		1.94	%
Currencies		21,166,291		11.66
Equity		2,499,315		1.38
Interest Rates		2,900,217		1.60
Total	$	30,086,975		16.58	%

24

As of December 31, 2015, the Partnership’s total capitalization was $206,869,254.

	December 31, 2015
			% of Total
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization
Commodities	$	10,323,796		4.99	%
Currencies		25,986,493		12.56
Equity		3,491,933		1.69
Interest Rates		3,981,536		1.93
Total	$	43,783,758		21.17	%

The following tables indicate the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership’s investments in the Funds by market category as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 and the highest and lowest value at any point and the average value during the three months ended June 30, 2016 and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015. All open position trading risk exposures of the Funds have been included in calculating the figures set forth below.

As of June 30, 2016, Willowbridge Master’s total capitalization was $389,064,437. The Partnership owned approximately 10.9% of Willowbridge Master. As of June 30, 2016, Willowbridge Master’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Willowbridge for trading) was as follows:

						June 30, 2016
			% of Total			High		Low		Average
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization			Value at Risk		Value at Risk		Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	25,140,961		6.46	%	$	41,085,554	$	19,334,303	$	29,638,317
Interest Rates U.S.		3,289,253		0.85			10,384,050		-		1,933,444
Metals		1,294,700		0.33			4,595,831		-		431,667
Total	$	29,724,914		7.64	%

* Average of month-end Values at Risk.

As of December 31, 2015, Willowbridge Master’s total capitalization was $348,699,949. The Partnership owned approximately 13.7% of Willowbridge Master. As of December 31, 2015, Willowbridge Master’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Willowbridge for trading) was as follows:

						December 31, 2015
			% of Total			High		Low		Average
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization			Value at Risk		Value at Risk		Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	76,807,828		22.03	%	$	85,018,080	$	173,995	$	37,637,619
Energy		1,482,863		0.42			9,071,259		667,917		3,089,442
Interest Rates U.S.		4,144,323		1.19			16,624,123		367,325		3,833,031
Total	$	82,435,014		23.64	%

* Annual average of month-end Values at Risk.

25

As of June 30, 2016, Aspect Master’s total capitalization was $57,299,896. The Partnership owned approximately 50.5% of Aspect Master. As of June 30, 2016, Aspect Master’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Aspect for trading) was as follows:

						June 30, 2016
			% of Total			High		Low		Average
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization			Value at Risk		Value at Risk		Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	2,087,678		3.64	%	$	4,807,437	$	2,004,831	$	3,582,735
Energy		281,820		0.49			593,615		186,435		309,669
Grains		328,421		0.57			418,368		294,513		338,233
Indices		585,982		1.02			1,308,664		501,719		923,803
Interest Rates U.S.		513,412		0.90			603,213		176,058		308,021
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		1,299,907		2.27			1,660,570		940,012		1,173,596
Livestock		48,923		0.09			79,448		19,751		54,918
Metals		343,443		0.60			675,256		292,857		459,494
Softs		394,340		0.69			394,340		131,904		278,695
Total	$	5,883,926		10.27	%

* Average of month-end Values at Risk.

As of December 31, 2015, Aspect Master’s total capitalization was $68,465,577. The Partnership owned approximately 55.3% of Aspect Master. As of December 31, 2015, Aspect Master’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Aspect for trading) was as follows:

						December 31, 2015
			% of Total			High		Low		Average
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization			Value at Risk		Value at Risk		Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	3,828,841		5.59	%	$	7,618,931	$	621,769	$	4,403,903
Energy		1,762,255		2.57			1,969,743		529,815		1,264,041
Grains		659,130		0.96			659,130		169,143		465,015
Indices		1,018,193		1.49			3,365,637		476,501		1,708,786
Interest Rates U.S.		131,024		0.19			700,590		89,018		389,407
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		1,272,166		1.86			2,845,509		676,060		1,469,168
Livestock		142,395		0.21			197,120		42,240		94,870
Metals		1,538,342		2.25			2,140,747		635,320		1,398,537
Softs		233,924		0.34			609,644		131,849		411,387
Total	$	10,586,270		15.46	%

* Annual average of month-end Values at Risk.

26

As of June 30, 2016, Graham Master’s total capitalization was $46,484,459. The Partnership owned approximately 72.7% of Graham Master. As of June 30, 2016, Graham Master’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Graham for trading) was as follows:

						June 30, 2016
			% of Total			High		Low		Average
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization			Value at Risk		Value at Risk		Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	2,124,771		4.57	%	$	3,987,099	$	1,614,161	$	2,629,318
Energy		854,480		1.84			870,155		207,284		616,495
Grains		354,321		0.76			375,012		205,150		306,378
Indices		1,996,565		4.30			2,660,422		1,709,766		2,055,670
Interest Rates U.S.		544,486		1.17			569,800		235,572		378,281
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		911,801		1.96			1,179,330		861,221		981,137
Metals		953,855		2.05			1,304,873		464,227		817,083
Softs		161,220		0.35			212,522		145,920		170,674
Total	$	7,901,499		17.00	%

* Average of month-end Values at Risk.

As of December 31, 2015, Graham Master’s total capitalization was $52,801,159. The Partnership owned approximately 72.7% of Graham Master. As of December 31, 2015, Graham Master’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Graham for trading) was as follows:

						December 31, 2015
			% of Total			High		Low		Average
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization			Value at Risk		Value at Risk		Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	2,331,119		4.41	%	$	4,887,561	$	58,036	$	2,513,001
Energy		995,500		1.89			1,134,705		243,890		726,523
Grains		534,820		1.01			621,445		112,442		430,838
Interest Rates U.S.		596,349		1.13			978,753		105,005		597,937
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		727,596		1.38			2,292,571		460,683		1,021,590
Metals		1,463,801		2.77			1,669,559		477,532		1,136,890
Softs		207,143		0.39			455,751		167,284		332,299
Indices		2,026,718		3.84			3,493,786		819,324		2,118,829
Total	$	8,883,046		16.82	%

* Annual average of month-end Values at Risk.

27

As of June 30, 2016, JEM Master’s total capitalization was $11,969,575. The Partnership owned approximately 64.1% of JEM Master. As of June 30, 2016 JEM Master’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to JE Moody for trading) was as follows:

						June 30, 2016
			% of Total			High		Low		Average
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization			Value at Risk		Value at Risk		Value at Risk*
Energy	$	327,340		2.73	%	$	903,181	$	197,478	$	415,097
Livestock		226,380		1.89			387,090		-		185,698
Softs		31,240		0.26			114,180		-		21,248
Total	$	584,960		4.88	%

* Average of month-end Values at Risk.

As of December 31, 2015, JEM Master’s total capitalization was $11,125,506. The Partnership owned approximately 61.0% of JEM Master. As of December 31, 2015, JEM Master’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to JE Moody for trading) was as follows:

						December 31, 2015
			% of Total			High		Low		Average
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization			Value at Risk		Value at Risk		Value at Risk*
Energy	$	50,386		0.45	%	$	3,600,762	$	30,861	$	638,968
Grains		114,400		1.03			312,510		7,700		117,038
Livestock		296,505		2.66			884,015		20,790		395,455
Softs		49,555		0.45			200,695		3,300		87,216
Total	$	510,846		4.59	%

* Annual average of month-end Values at Risk.

28

As of June 30, 2016 Boronia I, LLC’s total capitalization was $55,556,490. The Partnership owned approximately 40.6% of Boronia I, LLC. As of June 30, 2016 Boronia I, LLC’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Boronia for trading) was as follows:

						June 30, 2016
			% of Total			High		Low		Average
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization			Value at Risk		Value at Risk		Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	2,081,598		3.75	%	$	4,145,766	$	960,149	$	2,446,748
Interest Rates		1,397,148		2.51			3,041,134		874,165		1,854,291
Equity		1,851,948		3.33			3,593,875		1,326,486		2,144,856
Commodity		1,502,842		2.71			2,964,346		1,137,263		1,818,666
Total	$	6,833,536		12.30	%

* Average of month-end Values at Risk.

As of December 31, 2015, Boronia I, LLC’s total capitalization was $74,259,634. The Partnership owned approximately 48.8% of Boronia I, LLC. As of December 31, 2015, Boronia I, LLC’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Boronia for trading) was as follows:

						December 31, 2015
			% of Total			High		Low		Average
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization			Value at Risk		Value at Risk		Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	5,810,883		7.83	%	$	9,670,214	$	2,053,234	$	5,191,005
Interest Rates		2,205,898		2.97			6,694,425		920,459		2,940,943
Equity		1,325,953		1.79			9,574,905		1,217,103		4,374,314
Commodity		4,505,079		6.07			9,333,026		1,774,957		4,937,710
Total	$	13,847,813		18.66	%

* Annual average of month-end Values at Risk.

29

As of June 30, 2016 Cambridge Master’s total capitalization was $77,190,141. The Partnership owned approximately 41.6% of Cambridge Master. As of June 30, 2016 Cambridge Master’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Cambridge for trading) was as follows:

						June 30, 2016
			% of Total			High		Low		Average
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization			Value at Risk		Value at Risk		Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	36,013,969		46.66	%	$	40,764,247	$	19,579,219	$	27,023,361
Total	$	36,013,969		46.66	%

* Average of month-end Values at Risk.

As of December 31, 2015, Cambridge Master’s total capitalization was $59,709,922. The Partnership owned approximately 28.3% of Cambridge Master. As of December 31, 2015, Cambridge Master’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Cambridge for trading) was as follows:

						December 31, 2015
			% of Total			High		Low		Average
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization			Value at Risk		Value at Risk		Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	23,516,491		39.38	%	$	26,761,534	$	5,371,077	$	15,171,524
Total	$	23,516,491		39.38	%

* Annual average of month-end Values at Risk.

30

As of June 30, 2016, the Partnership has fully redeemed its investment in Altis Master. As of December 31, 2015, Altis Master’s total capitalization was $44,314,279. The Partnership owned approximately 59.7% of Altis Master. As of December 31, 2015, Altis Master’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Altis for trading) was as follow:

						December 31, 2015
			% of Total			High		Low		Average
Market Sector	Value at Risk		Capitalization			Value at Risk		Value at Risk		Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	3,619,547		8.17	%	$	4,043,379	$	762,004	$	2,314,790
Energy		486,097		1.10			1,849,188		317,820		823,518
Grains		903,643		2.04			1,584,736		341,578		683,784
Indices		1,354,076		3.05			2,594,991		430,768		1,621,815
Interest Rates U.S.		71,280		0.16			1,118,118		2,079		312,585
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		931,757		2.10			1,742,647		196,947		787,732
Livestock		380,936		0.86			802,340		81,978		355,740
Metals		1,967,779		4.44			2,182,160		655,693		1,639,449
Softs		1,094,704		2.47			1,320,826		331,654		907,082
Total	$	10,809,819		24.39	%

* Annual average of month-end Values at Risk.

31

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures.

The Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership on the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods expected in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in the reports it files is accumulated and communicated to management, including the President and Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”) of the General Partner, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure and appropriate SEC filings.

The General Partner is responsible for ensuring that there is an adequate and effective process for establishing, maintaining and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures for the Partnership’s external disclosures.

The General Partner’s President and CFO have evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2016 and, based on that evaluation, the General Partner’s President and CFO have concluded that, at that date, the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is a process under the supervision of the General Partner’s President and CFO to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. These controls include policies and procedures that:

• pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Partnership;

• provide reasonable assurance that (i) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and (ii) the Partnership’s receipts are handled and expenditures are made only pursuant to authorizations of the General Partner; and

• provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection and correction of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

There were no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting process during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2016 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

32

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.     Legal Proceedings.

This section describes the major pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which MS&Co. or its subsidiaries is a party or to which any of their property is subject. There are no material legal proceedings pending against the Partnership or the General Partner.

On June 1, 2011, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated converted from a Delaware corporation to a Delaware limited liability company. As a result of that conversion, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated is now named Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (“MS&Co.”).

MS&Co. is a wholly owned, indirect subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, a Delaware holding company. Morgan Stanley files periodic reports with the SEC as required by the Exchange Act, which include current descriptions of material litigation and material proceedings and investigations, if any, by governmental and/or regulatory agencies or self-regulatory organizations concerning Morgan Stanley and its subsidiaries, including MS&Co. As a consolidated subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, MS&Co. does not file its own periodic reports with the SEC that contain descriptions of material litigation, proceedings and investigations. As a result, please refer to the “Legal Proceedings” section of Morgan Stanley’s SEC 10-K filings for 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011. In addition, MS&Co. annually prepares an Audited, Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition (“Audited Financial Statement”) that is publicly available on Morgan Stanley’s website at www.morganstanley.com. We refer you to the Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies – Legal section of MS&Co.’s 2015 Audited Financial Statement.

In addition to the matters described in those filings, in the normal course of business, each of Morgan Stanley and MS&Co. has been named, from time to time, as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions, and other litigation, arising in connection with its activities as a global diversified financial services institution. Certain of the legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. Each of Morgan Stanley and MS&Co. is also involved, from time to time, in investigations and proceedings by governmental and/or regulatory agencies or self-regulatory organizations, certain of which may result in adverse judgments, fines or penalties. The number of these investigations and proceedings has increased in recent years with regard to many financial services institutions, including Morgan Stanley and MS&Co.

MS&Co. is a Delaware limited liability company with its main business office located at 1585 Broadway, New York, New York 10036. Among other registrations and memberships, MS&Co. is registered as a futures commission merchant and is a member of the National Futures Association.

Regulatory and Governmental Matters. 

MS&Co. has received subpoenas and requests for information from certain federal and state regulatory and governmental entities, including among others various members of the RMBS Working Group of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, such as the United States Department of Justice, Civil Division and several state Attorney General’s Offices, concerning the origination, financing, purchase, securitization and servicing of subprime and non-subprime residential mortgages and related matters such as residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”), collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”), structured investment vehicles (“SIVs”) and credit default swaps backed by or referencing mortgage pass-through certificates. These matters, some of which are in advanced stages, include, but are not limited to, investigations related to MS&Co.’s due diligence on the loans that it purchased for securitization, MS&Co.’s communications with ratings agencies, MS&Co.’s disclosures to investors, and MS&Co.’s handling of servicing and foreclosure related issues.

On February 25, 2015, MS&Co. reached an agreement in principle with the United States Department of Justice, Civil Division and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California, Civil Division (collectively, the “Civil Division”) to pay $2.6 billion to resolve certain claims that the Civil Division indicated it intended to bring against MS&Co. That settlement was finalized on February 10, 2016.

33

On April 1, 2016, the California Attorney General’s Office filed an action against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in California state court styled California v. Morgan Stanley, et al., on behalf of California investors, including the California Public Employees’ Retirement System and the California Teachers’ Retirement System. The complaint alleges that MS&Co. made misrepresentations and omissions regarding residential mortgage-backed securities and notes issued by the Cheyne SIV (defined below), and asserts violations of the California False Claims Act and other state laws and seeks treble damages, civil penalties, disgorgement, and injunctive relief. On July 20, 2016, MS&Co. filed a demurrer.

In October 2014, the Illinois Attorney General’s Office (“ILAG”) sent a letter to MS&Co. alleging that MS&Co. knowingly made misrepresentations related to RMBS purchased by certain pension funds affiliated with the State of Illinois and demanding that MS&Co. pay ILAG approximately $88 million. MS&Co. and ILAG reached an agreement to resolve the matter on February 10, 2016.

On January 13, 2015, the New York Attorney General’s Office (“NYAG”), which is also a member of the RMBS Working Group, indicated that it intends to file a lawsuit related to approximately 30 subprime securitizations sponsored by MS&Co. NYAG indicated that the lawsuit would allege that MS&Co. misrepresented or omitted material information related to the due diligence, underwriting and valuation of the loans in the securitizations and the properties securing them and indicated that its lawsuit would be brought under the Martin Act. MS&Co. and NYAG reached an agreement to resolve the matter on February 10, 2016.

On June 5, 2012, MS&Co. consented to and became the subject of an Order Instituting Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 6(c) and 6(d) of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) to resolve allegations related to the failure of a salesperson to comply with exchange rules that prohibit off-exchange futures transactions unless there is an Exchange for Related Position (“EFRP”). Specifically, the CFTC found that from April 2008 through October 2009, MS&Co. violated Section 4c(a) of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC Regulation 1.38 by executing, processing and reporting numerous off-exchange futures trades to the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”) and Chicago Board of Trade (“CBOT”) as EFRPs in violation of CME and CBOT rules because those trades lacked the corresponding and related cash, OTC swap, OTC option, or other OTC derivative position. In addition, the CFTC found that MS&Co. violated CFTC Regulation 166.3 by failing to supervise the handling of the trades at issue and failing to have adequate policies and procedures designed to detect and deter the violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC Regulations. Without admitting or denying the underlying allegations and without adjudication of any issue of law or fact, MS&Co. accepted and consented to entry of findings and the imposition of a cease and desist order, a fine of $5,000,000, and undertakings related to public statements, cooperation and payment of the fine. MS&Co. entered into corresponding and related settlements with the CME and CBOT in which the CME found that MS&Co. violated CME Rules 432.Q and 538 and fined MS&Co. $750,000 and CBOT found that MS&Co. violated CBOT Rules 432.Q and 538 and fined MS&Co. $1,000,000.

On July 23, 2014, the SEC approved a settlement by MS&Co. and certain affiliates to resolve an investigation related to certain subprime RMBS transactions sponsored and underwritten by those entities in 2007. Pursuant to the settlement, MS&Co. and certain affiliates were charged with violating Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, agreed to pay disgorgement and penalties in an amount of $275 million and neither admitted nor denied the SEC’s findings.

On April 21, 2015, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (“CBOE”) and the CBOE Futures Exchange, LLC (“CFE”) filed statements of charges against MS&Co. in connection with trading by one of MS&Co.’s former traders of EEM options contracts that allegedly disrupted the final settlement price of the November 2012 VXEM futures. CBOE alleged that MS&Co. violated CBOE Rules 4.1, 4.2 and 4.7, Sections 9(a) and 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. CFE alleged that MS&Co. violated CFE Rules 608, 609 and 620. The matters were resolved on June 28, 2016 without any findings of fraud.

34

On June 18, 2015, MS&Co. entered into a settlement with the SEC and paid a fine of $500,000 as part of the Municipalities Continuing Disclosure Cooperation Initiative to resolve allegations that MS&Co. failed to form a reasonable basis through adequate due diligence for believing the truthfulness of the assertions by issuers and/or obligors regarding their compliance with previous continuing disclosure undertakings pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 in connection with offerings in which MS&Co. acted as senior or sole underwriter.

On August 6, 2015, MS&Co. consented to and became the subject of an order by the CFTC to resolve allegations that MS&Co. violated CFTC Regulation 22.9(a) by failing to hold sufficient U.S. Dollars in cleared swap segregated accounts in the U.S. to meet all U.S. Dollar obligations to cleared swaps customers. Specifically, the CFTC found that while MS&Co. at all times held sufficient funds in segregation to cover its obligations to its customers, on certain days during 2013 and 2014, it held currencies, such as euros, instead of U.S. dollars, to meet its U.S. dollar obligations. In addition, the CFTC found that MS&Co. violated CFTC Regulation 166.3 by failing to have in place adequate procedures to ensure that it complied with Regulation 22.9(a). Without admitting or denying the findings or conclusions and without adjudication of any issue of law or fact, MS&Co. accepted and consented to the entry of findings, the imposition of a cease and desist order, a civil monetary penalty of $300,000, and undertakings related to public statements, cooperation, and payment of the monetary penalty.

Civil Litigation

On December 23, 2009, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle filed a complaint against MS&Co. and another defendant in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, styled Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., et al. The amended complaint, filed on September 28, 2010, alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $233 million. The complaint raises claims under the Washington State Securities Act and seeks, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. By orders dated June 23, 2011 and July 18, 2011, the court denied defendants’ omnibus motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint and on August 15, 2011, the court denied MS&Co.’s individual motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On March 7, 2013, the court granted defendants’ motion to strike plaintiff’s demand for a jury trial. The defendants’ joint motions for partial summary judgment were denied on November 9, 2015. At June 25, 2016, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $44 million, and the certificates had not yet incurred actual losses. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $44 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

On March 15, 2010, the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Superior Court of the State of California styled Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. et al. An amended complaint, filed on June 10, 2010, alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $276 million. The complaint raises claims under both the federal securities laws and California law and seeks, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On August 11, 2011, plaintiff’s federal securities law claims were dismissed with prejudice. On February 9, 2012, defendants’ demurrers with respect to all other claims were overruled. On December 20, 2013, plaintiff’s negligent misrepresentation claims were dismissed with prejudice. At June 25, 2016, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in these cases was approximately $55 million, and the certificates had incurred actual losses of approximately $2 million. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss for this action up to the difference between the $55 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., or upon sale, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

35

On July 15, 2010, China Development Industrial Bank (“CDIB”) filed a complaint against MS&Co., styled China Development Industrial Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated et al., which is pending in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County (“Supreme Court of NY”). The complaint relates to a $275 million credit default swap referencing the super senior portion of the STACK 2006-1 CDO. The complaint asserts claims for common law fraud, fraudulent inducement and fraudulent concealment and alleges that MS&Co. misrepresented the risks of the STACK 2006-1 CDO to CDIB, and that MS&Co. knew that the assets backing the CDO were of poor quality when it entered into the credit default swap with CDIB. The complaint seeks compensatory damages related to the approximately $228 million that CDIB alleges it has already lost under the credit default swap, rescission of CDIB’s obligation to pay an additional $12 million, punitive damages, equitable relief, fees and costs. On February 28, 2011, the court denied MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss the complaint. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss of up to approximately $240 million plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs.

On October 15, 2010, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Circuit Court of the State of Illinois, styled Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago v. Bank of America Funding Corporation et al. A corrected amended complaint was filed on April 8, 2011. The corrected amended complaint alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiff of a number of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans and asserts claims under Illinois law. The total amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. at issue in the action was approximately $203 million. The complaint seeks, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the corrected amended complaint on May 27, 2011, which was denied on September 19, 2012. On December 13, 2013, the court entered an order dismissing all claims related to one of the securitizations at issue. After that dismissal, the remaining amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $78 million. At June 25, 2016, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $49 million, and the certificates had not yet incurred actual losses. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $49 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

On April 20, 2011, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts styled Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston v. Ally Financial, Inc. F/K/A GMAC LLC et al. An amended complaint was filed on June 29, 2012 and alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $385 million. The amended complaint raises claims under the Massachusetts Uniform Securities Act, the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act and common law and seeks, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On May 26, 2011, defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended complaint were granted in part and denied in part on September 30, 2013. On November 25, 2013, July 16, 2014, and May 19, 2015, respectively, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its claims against MS&Co. with respect to three of the securitizations at issue. After these voluntary dismissals, the remaining amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $332 million. At June 25, 2016, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $53 million, and the certificates had not yet incurred actual losses. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $53 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., or upon sale, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

36

On May 3, 2013, plaintiffs in Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank AG et al. v. Morgan Stanley et al. filed a complaint against MS&Co., certain affiliates, and other defendants in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint alleges that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiff currently at issue in this action was approximately $644 million. The complaint alleges causes of action against MS&Co. for common law fraud, fraudulent concealment, aiding and abetting fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and rescission and seeks, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages. On June 10, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss the complaint. MS&Co. perfected its appeal from that decision on June 12, 2015. At June 25, 2016, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $258 million, and the certificates had incurred actual losses of approximately $84 million. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $258 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., or upon sale, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses.

On May 17, 2013, plaintiff in IKB International S.A. in Liquidation, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint alleges that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiff was approximately $132 million. The complaint alleges causes of action against MS&Co. for common law fraud, fraudulent concealment, aiding and abetting fraud, and negligent misrepresentation, and seeks, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages. On October 29, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss. All claims regarding four certificates were dismissed. After these dismissals, the remaining amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $116 million. On August 26, 2015, MS&Co. perfected its appeal from the court’s October 29, 2014 decision. At June 25, 2016, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $26 million, and the certificates had incurred actual losses of $58 million. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $26 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., or upon sale, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

Settled Civil Litigation

On August 25, 2008, MS&Co. and two ratings agencies were named as defendants in a purported class action related to securities issued by a SIV called Cheyne Finance PLC and Cheyne Finance LLC (together, the “Cheyne SIV”). The case was styled Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank, et al. v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., et al. The complaint alleged, among other things, that the ratings assigned to the securities issued by the Cheyne SIV were false and misleading, including because the ratings did not accurately reflect the risks associated with the subprime RMBS held by the Cheyne SIV. The plaintiffs asserted allegations of aiding and abetting fraud and negligent misrepresentation relating to approximately $852 million of securities issued by the Cheyne SIV. On April 24, 2013, the parties reached an agreement to settle the case, and on April 26, 2013, the court dismissed the action with prejudice.

37

On March 15, 2010, the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Superior Court of the State of California styled Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al. An amended complaint filed on June 10, 2010 alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiff of a number of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $704 million. The complaint raised claims under both the federal securities laws and California law and sought, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On January 26, 2015, as a result of a settlement with certain other defendants, the plaintiff requested and the court subsequently entered a dismissal with prejudice of certain of the plaintiff’s claims, including all remaining claims against MS&Co.

On July 9, 2010 and February 11, 2011, Cambridge Place Investment Management Inc. filed two separate complaints against MS&Co. and/or its affiliates and other defendants in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, both styled Cambridge Place Investment Management Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., et al. The complaints asserted claims on behalf of certain clients of plaintiff’s affiliates and allege that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale of a number of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. and/or its affiliates or sold to plaintiff’s affiliates’ clients by MS&Co. and/or its affiliates in the two matters was approximately $263 million. On February 11, 2014, the parties entered into an agreement to settle the litigation. On February 20, 2014, the court dismissed the action.

On October 25, 2010, MS&Co., certain affiliates and Pinnacle Performance Limited, a special purpose vehicle (“SPV”), were named as defendants in a purported class action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”), styled Ge Dandong, et al. v. Pinnacle Performance Ltd., et al. On January 31, 2014, the plaintiffs in the action, which related to securities issued by the SPV in Singapore, filed a second amended complaint, which asserted common law claims of fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, fraudulent inducement, aiding and abetting fraudulent inducement, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. On July 17, 2014, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation, which received final court approval on July 2, 2015.

On July 5, 2011, Allstate Insurance Company and certain of its affiliated entities filed a complaint against MS&Co. in the Supreme Court of NY, styled Allstate Insurance Company, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. An amended complaint was filed on September 9, 2011, and alleges that the defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to the plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly issued and/or sold to the plaintiffs by MS&Co. was approximately $104 million. The complaint raised common law claims of fraud, fraudulent inducement, aiding and abetting fraud, and negligent misrepresentation and seeks, among other things, compensatory and/or recessionary damages associated with the plaintiffs’ purchases of such certificates. On March 15, 2013, the court denied in substantial part the defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which order MS&Co. appealed on April 11, 2013. On May 3, 2013, MS&Co. filed its answer to the amended complaint. On January 16, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

On July 18, 2011, the Western and Southern Life Insurance Company and certain affiliated companies filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Court of Common Pleas in Ohio, styled Western and Southern Life Insurance Company, et al. v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc., et al. An amended complaint was filed on April 2, 2012 and alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of the certificates allegedly sold to plaintiffs by MS&Co. was approximately $153 million. On June 8, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

38

On September 2, 2011, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, as conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, filed 17 complaints against numerous financial services companies, including MS&Co. and certain affiliates. A complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates and other defendants was filed in the Supreme Court of NY, styled Federal Housing Finance Agency, as Conservator v. Morgan Stanley et al. The complaint alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac of residential mortgage pass-through certificates with an original unpaid balance of approximately $11 billion. The complaint raised claims under federal and state securities laws and common law and seeks, among other things, rescission and compensatory and punitive damages. On February 7, 2014, the parties entered into an agreement to settle the litigation. On February 20, 2014, the court dismissed the action.

On April 25, 2012, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and certain affiliates filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Supreme Court of NY, styled Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. An amended complaint was filed on June 29, 2012, and alleges that the defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to the plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten, and/or sold by MS&Co. was approximately $758 million. The amended complaint raised common law claims of fraud, fraudulent inducement, and aiding and abetting fraud and seeks, among other things, rescission, compensatory, and/or rescissionary damages, as well as punitive damages, associated with the plaintiffs’ purchases of such certificates. On April 11, 2014, the parties entered into a settlement agreement.

On April 25, 2012, The Prudential Insurance Company of America and certain affiliates filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, styled The Prudential Insurance Company of America, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. On October 16, 2012, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. was approximately $1.073 billion. The amended complaint raises claims under the New Jersey Uniform Securities Law, as well as common law claims of negligent misrepresentation, fraud, fraudulent inducement, equitable fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, and violations of the New Jersey RICO statute, and includes a claim for treble damages. On January 8, 2016, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

In re Morgan Stanley Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Litigation, which had been pending in the SDNY, was a putative class action involving allegations that, among other things, the registration statements and offering documents related to the offerings of certain mortgage pass-through certificates in 2006 and 2007 contained false and misleading information concerning the pools of residential loans that backed these securitizations. On December 18, 2014, the parties’ agreement to settle the litigation received final court approval, and on December 19, 2014, the court entered an order dismissing the action.

On November 4, 2011, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Franklin Bank S.S.B, filed two complaints against MS&Co. in the District Court of the State of Texas. Each was styled Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Franklin Bank, S.S.B v. Morgan Stanley & Company LLC F/K/A Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. and alleged that MS&Co. made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiff of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of certificates allegedly underwritten and sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. in these cases was approximately $67 million and $35 million, respectively. On July 2, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

39

On February 14, 2013, Bank Hapoalim B.M. filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Supreme Court of NY, styled Bank Hapoalim B.M. v. Morgan Stanley et al. The complaint alleges that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiff was approximately $141 million. On July 28, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation, and on August 12, 2015, the plaintiff filed a stipulation of discontinuance with prejudice.

On September 23, 2013, the plaintiff in National Credit Union Administration Board v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., et al. filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the SDNY. The complaint alleged that defendants made untrue statements of material fact or omitted to state material facts in the sale to the plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates issued by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiffs in the matter was approximately $417 million. The complaint alleged violations of federal and various state securities laws and sought, among other things, rescissionary and compensatory damages. On November 23, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the matter.

On September 16, 2014, the Virginia Attorney General’s Office filed a civil lawsuit, styled Commonwealth of Virginia ex rel. Integra REC LLC v. Barclays Capital Inc., et al., against MS&Co. and several other defendants in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond related to RMBS. The lawsuit alleged that MS&Co. and the other defendants knowingly made misrepresentations and omissions related to the loans backing RMBS purchased by the Virginia Retirement System. The complaint asserts claims under the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, as well as common law claims of actual and constructive fraud, and seeks, among other things, treble damages and civil penalties. On January 6, 2016, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation. An order dismissing the action with prejudice was entered on January 28, 2016.

Additional lawsuits containing claims similar to those described above may be filed in the future. In the course of its business, MS&Co., as a major futures commission merchant, is party to various civil actions, claims and routine regulatory investigations and proceedings that the General Partner believes do not have a material effect on the business of MS&Co. MS&Co. may establish reserves from time to time in connections with such actions.

40

Item 1A.   Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item lA. “Risk Factors” in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and under Part II, Item lA. “Risk Factors” in the Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016.

Item 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The public offering of Redeemable Units terminated on November 30, 2008.

For the three months ended June 30, 2016, there were no additional subscriptions. The Redeemable Units were issued in reliance upon applicable exemptions from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The Redeemable Units were purchased by accredited investors, as defined in Regulation D. In determining the applicability of the exemption, the General Partner relied on the fact that the Redeemable Units were purchased by accredited investors in a private offering.

Proceeds from the sale of Redeemable Units are used for the trading of commodity interests including futures contracts, options and forward contracts.

The following chart sets forth the purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership.

							(f) Maximum Number (or
							Approximate Dollar
					(c) Total Number of		Value) of Shares (or
					Shares (or Redeemable		Redeemable Units) that
	(a) Total Number of		(b) Average Price		Units) Purchased as Part		May yet be Purchased
	Redeemable Units		Paid per		of Publicly Announced		Under the Plans or
Period	Purchased*		Redeemable Unit**		Plans or Programs		Programs
April 1, 2016 - April 30, 2016		3,143.7270	$	956.68		N/A		N/A
May 1, 2016 - May 31, 2016		3,458.0770	$	934.60		N/A		N/A
June 1, 2016 - June 30, 2016		4,861.2610	$	957.62		N/A		N/A
		11,463.0650	$	950.42

* Generally, limited partners are permitted to redeem their Redeemable Units as of the end of each month on three business days’ notice to the General Partner. Under certain circumstances, the General Partner can compel redemption, although to date the General Partner has not exercised this right. Purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership reflected in the chart above were made in the ordinary course of the Partnership’s business in connection with effecting redemptions for limited partners.

** Redemptions of Redeemable Units are effected as of the end of each month at the net asset value per Redeemable Unit as of that day. No fee will be charged for redemptions.

Item 3.     Defaults Upon Senior Securities - None.

Item 4.     Mine Safety Disclosures - Not applicable.

Item 5.     Other Information - None.

41

Item 6.     Exhibits

3.1		Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on December 20, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(a)	Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated May 21, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(b)	Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated September 21, 2005 (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(c)	Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated September 19, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 99.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(d)	Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated September 28, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 30, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(e)	Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated June 29, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 3.1(e) to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(f)	Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated September 2, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 7, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(g)	Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership as filed in the office of the Secretary of State of the State of New York, dated August 7, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 3.1(g) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2		Limited Partnership Agreement (filed as Exhibit A to the Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on April 22, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(a)	Amendment No. 1 to the Limited Partnership Agreement, dated May 31, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(b)	Amendment No. 2 to the Limited Partnership Agreement dated as of August 8, 2014 and effective October 1, 2014 (filed as Exhibit 3.2(b) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 13, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference)
	(c)	Amendment No. 3 to the Limited Partnership Agreement dated as of December 30, 2015 and effective January 1, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 5, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1		Amended & Restated Commodity Futures Customer Agreement between the Partnership and MS&Co., effective September 24, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 10.1(b) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(a)	U.S. Treasury Securities Purchase Authorization Agreement, between the Partnership and MS&Co., effective June 1, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 4, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2		Subscription Escrow Agreement among the General Partner, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and The Bank of New York (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 27, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(a)	Amendment No. 5 to the Escrow Agreement among The Bank of New York, the General Partner and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.2(a) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 27, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).

42

10.3		Management Agreement among the Partnership, the General Partner and Graham (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on December 20, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(a)	Letter from the General Partner extending Management Agreement with Graham from June 30, 2015 through June 30, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.3(a) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(b)	Amendment No. 1 to the Management Agreement among the Partnership, the General Partner and Graham, effective April 1, 2014 (filed as Exhibit 10.3(b) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4		Management Agreement among the Partnership, the General Partner and Willowbridge (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on December 20, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(a)	Amendment to the Management Agreement, among the Partnership, the General Partner and Willowbridge, effective January 1, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 7, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(b)	Letter from the General Partner extending Management Agreement with Willowbridge from June 30, 2015 through June 30, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.4(b) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5		Management Agreement among the Partnership, the General Partner and Aspect (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(a)	Letter from the General Partner extending Management Agreement with Aspect from June 30, 2015 through June 30, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.8(a) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.6		Management Agreement among the Partnership, the General Partner and Altis (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(a)	Letter from the General Partner extending Management Agreement with Altis from June 30, 2015 through June 30, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.9(a) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(b)	Amendment to the Management Agreement dated August 1, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.7		Amended and Restated Alternative Investment Selling Agent Agreement between the Partnership, the General Partner and Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, dated March 3, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 8, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.8		Form of Subscription Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.9		Management Agreement among the Partnership, the General Partner, and JE Moody (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 7, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.10		Amended & Restated Master Services Agreement among the Partnership, the General Partner and SS&C Technologies, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.11		Management Agreement among the Partnership, the General Partner and Cambridge (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 4, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(a)	Amendment to the Management Agreement among the Partnership, the General Partner, and JE Moody, effective January 1, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 5, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.12		Management Agreement among the Partnership, the General Partner and ISAM (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 12, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

43

31.1 — Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Certification of President and Director) (filed herewith).

31.2 — Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director) (filed herewith).

32.1 — Section 1350 Certification (Certification of President and Director) (filed herewith).

32.2 — Section 1350 Certification (Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director) (filed herewith).

101. INS XBRL     Instance Document.

101. SCH XBRL   Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101. CAL XBRL   Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101. LAB XBRL   Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101. PRE XBRL    Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

101. DEF XBRL    Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

44

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

TACTICAL DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.

By:	Ceres Managed Futures LLC
	(General Partner)
By:	/s/ Patrick T. Egan
	Patrick T. Egan
	President and Director
Date:	August 11, 2016
By:	/s/ Steven Ross
	Steven Ross
	Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Accounting Officer)
Date:	August 11, 2016

45