XML 21 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Note 1 - Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
Notes to Financial Statements  
Organization, Consolidation, Basis of Presentation, Business Description and Accounting Policies [Text Block]
1.
Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
(a) Business
 
HMS is a leading provider of cost containment solutions in the U.S. healthcare marketplace. Using innovative technology as well as extensive data services and powerful analytics, the Company delivers coordination of benefits, payment integrity, and health management and engagement solutions through its operating subsidiaries to help healthcare payers improve performance and outcomes. The Company is managed and operates as
one
business segment with a single management team that reports to the Chief Executive Officer. The Company serves state Medicaid programs, commercial health plans, federal government health agencies, government and private employers, child support agencies, and other healthcare payers and sponsors. Together the various services help the Company’s customers recover improper payments; prevent future improper payments; reduce fraud, waste and abuse; better manage the care that members receive; and ensure regulatory compliance.
 
The consolidated financial statements and notes herein are unaudited. Accordingly, they do
not
include all of the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. These statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) that management considers necessary to present a fair statement of the Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows. The results reported in these unaudited consolidated financial statements should
not
be regarded as necessarily indicative of results that
may
be expected for the entire year. It is suggested that these unaudited consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2016
which were filed with the SEC as part of the
2016
Form
10
-K. The consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2016
included herein was derived from audited financial statements, but does
not
include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP.
 
The preparation of the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, primarily accounts receivable, intangible assets, fixed assets, accrued expenses, estimated liability for appeals, the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the unaudited consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. The Company’s actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
These unaudited consolidated financial statements include HMS accounts and transactions and those of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
(b) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
There have been
no
material changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies that are referenced in the
2016
Form
10
-K.
 
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
 
In
March 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2016
-
09,
Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic
718
): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accountin
g, (“ASU
2016
-
09”
) that changes the accounting for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees. The new guidance requires excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies to be recorded in the income statement when stock awards vest or are settled. In addition, cash flows related to excess tax benefits will
no
longer be separately classified as a financing activity apart from other income tax cash flows. The standard also allows Companies to repurchase more of an employee’s vesting shares for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting, clarifies that all cash payments made to tax authorities on an employee’s behalf for withheld shares should be presented as a financing activity on the cash flows statement and provides an accounting policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur. ASU
2016
-
09
is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2016,
including interim periods within such annual reporting periods with early adoption permitted. The Company elected to early adopt the new guidance in the
fourth
quarter of fiscal year
2016
which requires us to reflect any adjustments as of
January 1, 2016,
the beginning of the annual period that includes the interim period of adoption. The primary impact of adoption was the recognition of excess tax benefits in the provision for income taxes rather than paid-in capital for all periods in fiscal year
2016.
 Additional amendments to the accounting for income taxes and minimum statutory withholding tax requirements had
no
impact to retained earnings as of
January 1, 2016,
where the cumulative effect of these changes are required to be recorded. The Company elected to continue to estimate forfeitures expected to occur to determine the amount of compensation cost to be recognized in each period. The Company elected to apply the presentation requirements for cash flows related to excess tax benefits retrospectively to all periods presented which resulted in an increase to both net cash from operations and net cash used in financing of
$0.01
million for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2016.
Adoption of the new standard resulted in the recognition of net excess tax benefits in the provision for income taxes rather than paid-in capital of
$0.1
million for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2016.
The presentation requirements for cash flows related to employee taxes paid for withheld shares had
no
impact to any of the periods presented on the consolidated statements of cash flow since such cash flows have historically been presented as a financing activity.
 
In
November 2015,
the FASB issued ASU
2015
-
17,
Income Taxes (Topic
740
): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes
(“ASU
2015
-
17”
). ASU
2015
-
17
simplifies the current presentation of separately classifying deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet by requiring companies to present them as noncurrent. ASU
2015
-
17,
as amended, is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2016,
including interim periods within such annual reporting periods with early adoption permitted. The Company elected to early adopt the new guidance in the
fourth
quarter of fiscal year
2016.
The Company elected to apply the presentation requirements for the balance sheet retrospectively to all periods presented which resulted in a decrease to total current assets and total long term liabilities of
$7.5
million at
December 31, 2016.
 
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
 
In
May 2014,
the FASB issued ASU
2014
-
09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic
606
) (“ASU
2014
-
09”
), which is the new comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The FASB has recently issued several amendments to the standard, including: principal versus agent considerations; clarification on accounting for licenses of intellectual property and identifying performance obligations; narrow scope-improvements and practical expedients; and technical corrections and improvements. ASU
2014
-
09
is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2017,
including interim periods within such annual reporting periods with early adoption permitted. The Company does
not
plan to early adopt this guidance and therefore will adopt on
January 1, 2018.
The guidance permits
two
methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (modified retrospective method). The Company is in the process of determining the adoption method but preliminarily expects to use the modified retrospective method. The Company, with the assistance of external consultants, has developed and is currently following a preliminary implementation plan. One major element of this plan involves reviewing historical contracts to quantify the impact that adoption will have on the Company’s operations. Depending on the results of the Company’s review, there could be material changes to the timing and recognition of revenues and certain associated expenses. The Company expects to complete the review of historical contracts and the overall assessment process, including selecting a transition plan and an assessment of the overall impact to the results of operations by the end of the
third
quarter of
2017.
 
In
February 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
2016
-
02,
Leases (Topic
842
)
(“ASU
2016
-
02”
). ASU
2016
-
02
will require most lessees to recognize a majority of the Company’s leases on the balance sheet, which will increase reported assets and liabilities. ASU
2016
-
02
is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2018
including interim periods within such annual reporting periods with early adoption permitted. The Company has
not
early adopted this guidance and is currently evaluating the impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
In
August 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2016
-
15,
Statements of Cash Flows (Topic
230
): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
(“ASU
2016
-
15”
)
.
The amendment clarifies where certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. Current guidance does
not
include specific guidance on the
eight
classification issues presented in the amendments, which are intended to reduce diversity in practice with respect to classification and presentation of such cash receipts and payments. The amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2017,
and for interim reporting periods within such annual periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on the Company’s financial statements.
 
In
January 2017,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2017
-
01,
Business Combinations (Topic
805
) – Clarifying the Definition of a Business
(“ASU
2017
-
01”
). ASU
2017
-
01
finalizes previous proposals regarding shareholder concerns that the definition of a business is applied too broadly. The guidance assists entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions of assets or of businesses. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2017,
including interim periods within those periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on the Company’s financial statements of adopting this guidance.
 
In
January 2017,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2017
-
04,
Goodwill and Other (Topic
350
): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (
“ASU
2017
-
04”
). This amendment simplifies the manner in which an entity is required to test for goodwill impairment by eliminating Step
2
from the goodwill impairment test. Step
2
measures goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The amendment simplifies this approach by having the entity (
1
) perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, and (
2
) recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, with the understanding that the loss recognized should
not
exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The amendment is effective for public entities that are SEC filers prospectively for their annual, or any interim, goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2019.
Early adoption is permitted for all entities for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after
January 1, 2017.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact on the Company’s financial statements of adopting this guidance.
 
In
May 2017,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2017
-
09,
Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic
718
) – Scope of Modification Accounting
(“ASU
2017
-
09”
). ASU
2017
-
09
finalizes previous proposals regarding the complexity around share-based payment awards for modifications. The amendment simplifies the terms or conditions for applying modification accounting unless all of the following are satisfied: (
1
) the fair value (or calculated value or intrinsic value, if such an alternative measurement method is used) of the modified award is the same as the fair value (or calculated value or intrinsic value, if such an alternative measurement method is used) of the original award immediately before the original award is modified; (
2
) the vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the vesting conditions of the original award immediately before the original award is modified; and (
3
) the classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or as a liability instrument is the same as the classification of the original award immediately before the original award is modified. The amendment is effective for public entities that are SEC filers for annual and interim periods beginning after
December 15, 2017.
Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for reporting periods for which financial statements have
not
yet been issued. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on the Company’s financial statements of adopting this guidance.
 
Other new pronouncements issued but
not
effective until after
March 31, 2017,
if any, are
not
expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.