EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dean L. Cash, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund X, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2012

/s/ Dean L. Cash Dean L. Cash President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund X, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2012

/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi Paritosh K. Choksi Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund X, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 13, 2012

/s/ Dean L. Cash Dean L. Cash President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund X, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 13, 2012

/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi Paritosh K. Choksi Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

Allowance for Credit Losses (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Beginning Balance			$ 115	$ 62	$ 62
(Reversal of provision) Provision	(23)	7	(44)	(10)	53
Ending Balance	71		71		115
Accounts Receivable Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | Notes Receivable
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Beginning Balance				25	25
(Reversal of provision) Provision					(25)
Accounts Receivable Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | Finance Leases
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
(Reversal of provision) Provision					10
Ending Balance	10		10		10
Accounts Receivable Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | Operating Leases
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Beginning Balance			102	37	37
(Reversal of provision) Provision			(80)		65
Ending Balance	22		22		102
Valuation Adjustments on Financing Receivables | Notes Receivable
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Beginning Balance			3
(Reversal of provision) Provision			36		3
Ending Balance	$ 39		$ 39		$ 3

XML

Future Minimum Payments of Non-Recourse Debt (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2012
Principal
Three months ending December 31, 2012	$ 1,335
Year ending December 31, 2013	4,689
2014	4,013
2015	4,208
2016	3,743
2017	178
Long-term Debt, Total	18,166
Interest
Three months ending December 31, 2012	294
Year ending December 31, 2013	954
2014	679
2015	410
2016	133
2017	1
Long Term Debt Interest, Total	2,471
Total
Three months ending December 31, 2012	1,629
Year ending December 31, 2013	5,643
2014	4,692
2015	4,618
2016	3,876
2017	179
Long Term Debt Principal and Interest, Total	$ 20,637

XML

Investment in equipment and leases, net - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011
Leases Disclosure [Line Items]
Amortization of initial direct costs	$ 28	$ 44	$ 92	$ 161
Impairment losses on equipment	338	124	430	224
Depreciation of operating lease assets	2,113	3,021	7,189	9,826
Average estimated residual value of assets on operating leases	22.00%		22.00%		22.00%
Finance Leases
Leases Disclosure [Line Items]
Amortization of initial direct costs	$ 28	$ 44	$ 91	$ 160

XML

Borrowing Facilities - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Maximum amount of credit facility		$ 60,000,000	$ 75,000,000
Credit Facility expiration date		2013-09
Tangible Net Worth requirement under the Credit Facility		15,000,000
Leverage ratio		0.68
Interest coverage ratio		11.91
Net Worth		32,700,000
Borrowed from acquisition facility	500,000	500,000
Repayments under acquisition facility	500,000	500,000
Line of Credit
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Weighted average interest rate		3.16%
Covenant Requirement | Maximum
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Leverage ratio		1.25
Covenant Requirement | Minimum
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Interest coverage ratio		2
Warehouse Agreement Borrowings
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Outstanding borrowings under facility			5,600,000
Warehouse Agreement Borrowings | Maximum
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Contingent obligation			$ 1,500,000

XML

Investment in Leases (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012
Leases Disclosure [Line Items]
Balance December 31, 2011	$ 60,250
Reclassifications, Additions / Dispositions and Impairment Losses	(2,208)
Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases	(8,755)
Balance September 30, 2012	49,287
Operating Leases
Leases Disclosure [Line Items]
Balance December 31, 2011	43,913
Reclassifications, Additions / Dispositions and Impairment Losses	(1,804)
Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases	(7,189)
Balance September 30, 2012	34,920
Direct Financing Leases
Leases Disclosure [Line Items]
Balance December 31, 2011	14,995
Reclassifications, Additions / Dispositions and Impairment Losses	40
Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases	(1,475)
Balance September 30, 2012	13,560
Assets Held-For-Sale and Lease
Leases Disclosure [Line Items]
Balance December 31, 2011	1,121
Reclassifications, Additions / Dispositions and Impairment Losses	(444)
Balance September 30, 2012	677
Initial Direct Cost
Leases Disclosure [Line Items]
Balance December 31, 2011	221
Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases	(91)
Balance September 30, 2012	$ 130

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended	6 Months Ended	9 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012 Segment	Sep. 30, 2011
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Number of reportable segments			1
Impairment of investment security	$ 96	$ 29		$ 96
Realized gain on sales or dispositions of securities				23
Unrealized gains relative to the conversion of warrants		31	31
Realized gains on net exercise of warrants				$ 19

XML

Receivables Funding Program - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Receivables funding program obligation	$ 4,160,000		$ 4,160,000		$ 7,666,000
Expected future lease receivables identified as collateral under the Program	20,200,000		20,200,000
Receivables Funding Program
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Outstanding amount under RF Program	80,000,000		80,000,000
Maturity date of RF Program	2014-07		2014-07
Receivables funding program obligation	4,160,000		4,160,000		7,666,000
Program fees paid	4,000	11,000	19,000	37,000
Notional principal amount	4,160,000		4,160,000		7,666,000
Variable Interest rate	0.24%		0.24%		0.25%
Expected future lease receivables identified as collateral under the Program	$ 4,700,000		$ 4,700,000
Weighted average interest rates on the RF Program, including interest on the swap contracts	5.37%	5.04%	5.45%	4.90%
Receivables Funding Program | Minimum
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Rate on Interest Swap Agreement	3.21%		3.21%		3.21%
Receivables Funding Program | Maximum
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Rate on Interest Swap Agreement	5.39%		5.39%		5.39%

XML

Investment in Equipment and Leases, Net (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Investment in Leases

The Company’s investment in equipment leases consists of the following (in thousands):

	Balance December 31, 2011		Reclassifications, Additions/ Dispositions and Impairment Losses			Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases			Balance September 30, 2012
Net investment in operating leases	$	43,913	$	(1,804	)	$	(7,189	)	$	34,920
Net investment in direct financing leases		14,995		40			(1,475	)		13,560
Assets held for sale or lease, net		1,121		(444	)		—			677
Initial direct costs, net of accumulated amortization of $359 at September 30, 2012 and $526 at December 31, 2011		221		—			(91	)		130
Total	$	60,250	$	(2,208	)	$	(8,755	)	$	49,287

Property on Operating Leases

Property on operating leases consists of the following (in thousands):

	Balance December 31, 2011			Additions			Reclassifications, Dispositions and Impairment Losses			Balance September 30, 2012
Transportation, rail	$	28,286		$	—		$	1,300		$	29,586
Transportation, other		28,829			—			(1,075	)		27,754
Materials handling		24,032			—			(8,150	)		15,882
Manufacturing		8,302			—			—			8,302
Construction		4,808			—			—			4,808
Aircraft		4,732			—			(341	)		4,391
Logging & lumber		4,125			—			(66	)		4,059
Petro/natural gas		2,446			—			—			2,446
Agriculture		1,509			—			(824	)		685
Data processing		937			—			(166	)		771
Research		368			—			(368	)		—
		108,374			—			(9,690	)		98,684
Less accumulated depreciation		(64,461	)		(7,189	)		7,886			(63,764	)
Total	$	43,913		$	(7,189	)	$	(1,804	)	$	34,920

Components of Company's Investment in Direct Financing Leases

The components of the Company’s investment in direct financing leases as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):

	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Total minimum lease payments receivable	$	18,962		$	22,900
Estimated residual values of leased equipment (unguaranteed)		3,762			3,805
Investment in direct financing leases		22,724			26,705
Less unearned income		(9,164	)		(11,710	)
Net investment in direct financing leases	$	13,560		$	14,995

Aggregate Amounts of Future Minimum Lease Payments Receivable

At September 30, 2012, the aggregate amounts of future minimum lease payments receivable are as follows (in thousands):

	Operating Leases		Direct Financing Leases		Total
Three months ending December 31, 2012	$	2,420	$	1,316	$	3,736
Year ending December 31, 2013		7,783		4,865		12,648
2014		4,693		4,602		9,295
2015		1,963		4,478		6,441
2016		515		3,699		4,214
2017		489		2		491
Thereafter		119		—		119
	$	17,982	$	18,962	$	36,944

XML

Components of Company's Investment in Direct Financing Leases (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Capital Leased Assets [Line Items]
Total minimum lease payments receivable	$ 18,962	$ 22,900
Estimated residual values of leased equipment (unguaranteed)	3,762	3,805
Investment in direct financing leases	22,724	26,705
Less unearned income	(9,164)	(11,710)
Net investment in direct financing leases	$ 13,560	$ 14,995

XML

Financing Receivables By Credit Quality Indicator and Class (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Notes Receivable	$ 954	$ 1,269
Finance Leases	13,560	14,995
Pass
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Notes Receivable	100	169
Finance Leases	13,524	14,922
Special Mention
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]
Notes Receivable	854	1,100
Finance Leases	$ 36	$ 73

XML

Minimum Future Payments Receivable (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Three months ending December 31, 2012	$ 141
Year ending December 31, 2013	384
2014	221
2015	165
2016	188
Financing Receivable, Gross, Total	1,099
Less: portion representing unearned interest income	(145)	(210)
Notes Receivable	954	1,269
Unamortized initial direct costs	1	2
Less: Reserve for impairment	(39)	(3)
Notes receivable, net	$ 916	$ 1,268

XML

Atel Financial Services and/ or Affiliates Earned Fees, Commissions, and Billed for Reimbursements Pursuant to Operating Agreement (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Costs reimbursed to Managing Member and/or affiliates	$ 319	$ 362	$ 1,242	$ 1,095
Asset management fees to Managing Member and/or affiliates	145	59	619	540
Acquisition and initial direct costs paid to Managing Member		96		304
Related Party Transaction, Expenses from Transactions with Related Party, Total	$ 464	$ 517	$ 1,861	$ 1,939

XML

Members' Capital - Additional Information (Detail)	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Other Members Capital Account [Line Items]
Other Members capital account, units issued	13,971,486	13,971,486
Other Members capital account, units outstanding	13,971,486	13,971,486
Other Members capital account, units authorized	15,000,000	15,000,000
Potential Repurchase Price of Units as Percentage of Holder's Capital Account	100.00%
Initial Members
Other Members Capital Account [Line Items]
Other Members capital account, units issued	50	50
Other Member
Other Members Capital Account [Line Items]
Allocation of Net Income, Net Losses, and Distributions	92.50%
Managing Member
Other Members Capital Account [Line Items]
Allocation of Net Income, Net Losses, and Distributions	7.50%

XML

Investment in Leases (Parenthetical) (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Leases Disclosure [Line Items]
Initial direct costs, accumulated amortization	$ 359	$ 526

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

2. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Basis of presentation:

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q as mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of the Managing Member, necessary for a fair statement of financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no significant effect on the reported financial position or results of operations.

Footnote and tabular amounts are presented in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data.

In preparing the accompanying unaudited financial statements, the Managing Member has reviewed events that have occurred after September 30, 2012, up until the issuance of the financial statements. No events were noted which would require disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements, and adjustments thereto.

Use of estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such estimates primarily relate to the determination of residual values at the end of the lease term and expected future cash flows used for impairment analysis purposes and determination of the allowances for doubtful accounts and notes receivable.

Segment reporting:

The Company is not organized by multiple operating segments for the purpose of making operating decisions or assessing performance. Accordingly, the Company operates in one reportable operating segment in the United States.

The primary geographic regions in which the Company seeks leasing opportunities are North America and Europe. The table below summarizes geographic information relating to the sources, by nation, of the Company’s total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 and long-lived tangible assets as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		% of Total			2011		% of Total
Revenue
United States	$	15,260		92	%	$	16,481		94	%
United Kingdom		664		4	%		753		4	%
Canada		678		4	%		301		2	%
Total International		1,342		8	%		1,054		6	%
Total	$	16,602		100	%	$	17,535		100	%

	As of September 30,					As of December 31,
	2012		% of Total			2011		% of Total
Long-lived assets
United States	$	45,807		93	%	$	55,822		93	%
United Kingdom		647		1	%		1,033		2	%
Canada		2,833		6	%		3,395		5	%
Total International		3,480		7	%		4,428		7	%
Total	$	49,287		100	%	$	60,250		100	%

Investment in securities:

From time to time, the Company may purchase securities of its borrowers or receive warrants to purchase securities in connection with its lending arrangements.

Purchased securities

Purchased securities are generally not registered for public sale and are carried at cost. Such securities are adjusted to fair value if the fair value is less than the carrying value and such impairment is deemed by the Managing Member to be other than temporary. Factors considered by the Managing Member in determining fair value include, but are not limited to, available financial information, the issuer’s ability to meet its current obligations and indications of the issuer’s subsequent ability to raise capital. During the first six months of 2012, the Company had previously recorded fair value adjustments totaling $29 thousand to reduce the cost basis of certain investments deemed impaired. There were no additional fair value adjustments recorded during the third quarter of 2012. By contrast, during the first nine months of 2011, the Company recorded fair value adjustments totaling $96 thousand, all of which were recorded during the first quarter of 2011. Gains and/or losses recognized on sales or dispositions of securities were nominal for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, as well as for the first nine months of 2012. During the first nine months of 2011, realized gains amounted to $23 thousand.

Warrants

Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are carried at an estimated fair value on the balance sheet at the end of the period, as determined by the Managing Member. At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Managing Member estimated the fair value of the warrants to be nominal in amount. During the first six months of 2012, the Company recorded $31 thousand of unrealized gains relative to the conversion of warrants associated with shares of a venture company. There were no unrealized gains recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. Further, there were no such unrealized gains during the preceding six months of 2011. Gains and/or losses recognized on the net exercise of certain warrants were nominal for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and for the first nine months of 2012. By contrast, realized gains amounted to $19 thousand during the first nine months of 2011.

Other income, net:

The Company’s other income, net for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 consists of the following (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Foreign currency gain (loss)	$	44	$	24	$	32	$	(133	)
Change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts		38		73		138		250
Total	$	82	$	97	$	170	$	117

Per Unit data:

Net income and distributions per Unit are based upon the weighted average number of Other Members’ Units outstanding during the period.

Recent accounting pronouncements:

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) (collectively the “Boards”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” ASU 2011-04 created a uniform framework for applying fair value measurement principles for companies around the world and clarified existing guidance in US GAAP. ASU 2011-04 is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2011 and shall be applied prospectively. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2011-04 effective January 1, 2012. The fair value measurement provisions of ASU 2011-04 had no material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

XML

Distributions to Other Members (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011
Distribution Made to Member or Limited Partner [Line Items]
Distributions declared		$ 2,795	$ 3,493	$ 8,389	$ 11,184
Weighted average number of Units outstanding	13,971,486	13,971,486	13,971,486	13,971,486
Weighted average distributions per Unit		$ 0.20	$ 0.25	$ 0.60

XML

Impaired Loans (Detail) (Notes Receivable, USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Notes Receivable
Financing Receivable, Impaired [Line Items]
Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance Recorded, Recorded Investment
Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance Recorded, Unpaid Principal Balance
Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance Recorded, Related Allowance
Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance Recorded, Average Recorded Investment
Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance Recorded, Interest Income Recognized
Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded, Recorded Investment	73	21
Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded, Unpaid Principal Balance	112	24
Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded, Related Allowance	39	3
Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded, Average Recorded Investment	112	24
Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded, Interest Income Recognized
Impaired Loans, Recorded Investment	73	21
Impaired Loans, Unpaid Principal Balance	112	24
Impaired Loans, Related Allowance	39	3
Impaired Loans, Average Recorded Investment	112	24
Impaired Loans, Interest Income

XML

Receivables Funding Program (Tables) (Receivables Funding Program)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Receivables Funding Program

Borrowings and Interest Rate Swap Agreements under RF Program

At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, borrowings and interest rate swap agreements under the RF Program are as follows (in thousands):

Date Borrowed	Original Amount Borrowed		Balance September 30, 2012		Notional Balance September 30, 2012		Swap Value September 30, 2012			Payment Rate On Interest Swap Agreement
January 16, 2007	$	12,365	$	278	$	278	$	(4	)		5.15	%
July 2, 2007		7,222		183		183		(7	)		5.39	%
September 19, 2007		6,874		588		588		(22	)		4.83	%
January 15, 2008		10,018		461		461		(10	)		3.58	%
March 27, 2008		5,410		1,343		1,343		(38	)		3.21	%
May 16, 2008		10,194		1,133		1,133		(26	)		3.69	%
May 28, 2008		5,470		174		174		(4	)		3.49	%
	$	57,553	$	4,160	$	4,160	$	(111	)

Date Borrowed	Original Amount Borrowed		Balance December 31, 2011		Notional Balance December 31, 2011		Swap Value December 31, 2011			Payment Rate On Interest Swap Agreement
January 16, 2007	$	12,365	$	994	$	994	$	(27	)		5.15	%
July 2, 2007		7,222		272		272		(15	)		5.39	%
September 19, 2007		6,874		1,025		1,025		(45	)		4.83	%
January 15, 2008		10,018		885		885		(25	)		3.58	%
March 27, 2008		5,410		2,024		2,024		(66	)		3.21	%
May 16, 2008		10,194		2,098		2,098		(62	)		3.69	%
May 28, 2008		5,470		368		368		(9	)		3.49	%
	$	57,553	$	7,666	$	7,666	$	(249	)

Minimum Principal Repayment Schedule Under Program

At September 30, 2012, the minimum principal repayment schedule under the Program is as follows (in thousands):

Three months ending December 31, 2012	$	852
Year ending December 31, 2013		2,528
2014		780
	$	4,160

XML

Borrowing Facilities (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Borrowings Under Facility

As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, borrowings under the facility were as follows (in thousands):

	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Total amount available under the financing arrangement	$	60,000		$	75,000
Amount borrowed by the Company under the acquisition facility		—			—
Amounts borrowed by affiliated partnerships and limited liability companies under the working capital, acquisition and warehouse facilities		(1,025	)		(7,476	)
Total remaining available under the working capital, acquisition and warehouse facilities	$	58,975		$	67,524

XML

Borrowings Under Facility (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Total amount available under the financing arrangement	$ 60,000	$ 75,000
Total remaining available under the working capital, acquisition and warehouse facilities	58,975	67,524
Affiliated partnerships and limited liability companies
Line of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Amount borrowed	$ (1,025)	$ (7,476)

XML

Net Investment in Financing Receivables by Age (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
30-59 Days Past Due	$ 7	$ 36
60-89 Days Past Due
Greater Than 90 Days	37	1
Total Past Due	44	37
Current	14,470	16,227
Total Financing Receivables	14,514	16,264
Recorded Investment > 90 Days and Accruing		1
Notes Receivable
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
60-89 Days Past Due
Current	954	1,269
Total Financing Receivables	954	1,269
Finance Leases
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
30-59 Days Past Due	7	36
60-89 Days Past Due
Greater Than 90 Days	37	1
Total Past Due	44	37
Current	13,516	14,958
Total Financing Receivables	13,560	14,995
Recorded Investment > 90 Days and Accruing		$ 1

XML

Members' Capital (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Distributions to Other Members

Distributions to the Other Members were as follows (in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Distributions declared	$	—	$	2,795	$	3,493	$	8,389
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		13,971,486		13,971,486		13,971,486		13,971,486
Weighted average distributions per Unit	$	—	$	0.20	$	0.25	$	0.60

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Fair Value Measurement of Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on Recurring and Non-recurring Basis

The following table presents the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis and the level within the hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

	September 30, 2012		Level 1 Estimated Fair Value		Level 2 Estimated Fair Value		Level 3 Estimated Fair Value
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired lease and off-lease assets	$	204	$	—	$	—	$	204
Impaired notes receivable, net		74		—		—		74
Impaired investment securities		10		—		—		10
Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Interest rate swaps	$	111	$	—	$	111	$	—

	December 31, 2011		Level 1 Estimated Fair Value		Level 2 Estimated Fair Value		Level 3 Estimated Fair Value
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired off-lease assets	$	115	$	—	$	—	$	115
Impaired notes receivable, net		22		—		—		22
Impaired investment securities		8		—		—		8
Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Interest rate swaps	$	249	$	—	$	249	$	—

Estimated Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The following table presents a summary of the carrying value and fair value by level of financial instruments on the Company’s balance sheet at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2012
	Carrying Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4,733	$	4,733	$	—	$	—	$	4,733
Notes receivable, net		916		—		—		916		916
Investment in securities		73		—		—		73		73
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		18,166		—		—		19,090		19,090
Borrowings		4,160		—		—		4,160		4,160
Interest rate swap contracts		111		—		111		—		111

	December 31, 2011
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,082	$	1,082
Notes receivable		1,268		1,268
Investment in securities		70		70
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		21,851		22,962
Borrowings		7,666		7,666
Interest rate swap contracts		249		249

XML

Organization and Limited Liability Company Matters

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Organization and Limited Liability Company Matters

1. Organization and Limited Liability Company matters:

ATEL Capital Equipment Fund X, LLC (the “Company” or the “Fund”) was formed under the laws of the State of California on August 12, 2002 for the purpose of engaging in the sale of limited liability company investment units and acquiring equipment to engage in equipment leasing, lending and sales activities, primarily in the United States. The Managing Member or Manager of the Company is ATEL Financial Services, LLC (“AFS”), a California limited liability company. The Company may continue until December 31, 2022.

The Company conducted a public offering of 15,000,000 Limited Liability Company Units (“Units”), at a price of $10 per Unit. On April 9, 2003, subscriptions for the minimum number of Units (120,000, representing $1.2 million) had been received (excluding subscriptions from Pennsylvania investors) and AFS requested that the subscriptions be released to the Company. On that date, the Company commenced operations in its primary business. As of March 11, 2005, the offering was terminated. As of that date, subscriptions for 14,059,136 Units ($140.6 million) had been received, of which 87,650 Units ($720 thousand) were subsequently rescinded or repurchased (net of distributions paid and allocated syndication costs, as applicable) by the Company through September 30, 2012. As of September 30, 2012, 13,971,486 Units remain issued and outstanding.

The Company’s principal objectives are to invest in a diversified portfolio of equipment that (i) preserves, protects and returns the Company’s invested capital; (ii) generates regular distributions to the members of cash from operations and cash from sales or refinancing, with any balance remaining after certain minimum distributions to be used to purchase additional equipment during the reinvestment period (“Reinvestment Period”) (defined as six full years following the year the offering was terminated) which ends on December 31, 2011 and (iii) provides additional distributions following the Reinvestment Period and until all equipment has been sold. The Company is governed by the Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement (“Operating Agreement”), as amended. On January 1, 2012, the Company commenced liquidation phase activities pursuant to the guidelines of the Operating Agreement.

Pursuant to the terms of the Operating Agreement, AFS receives compensation for services rendered and reimbursements for costs incurred on behalf of the Company (See Note 6). The Company is required to maintain reasonable cash reserves for working capital, the repurchase of Units and contingencies. The repurchase of Units is solely at the discretion of AFS.

On or about December 1, 2012, the offices of the Fund and the Manager will be relocated to The Transamerica Pyramid, 600 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111. The telephone number for the Manager will be the same in its new location.

These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

XML

Organization and Limited Liability Company Matters - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	1 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Mar. 11, 2005	Apr. 09, 2003	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure [Line Items]
Partnership termination date			Dec. 31, 2022
Public offering of Limited Liability Company Units		15,000,000
Public offering of Limited Liability Company Units, price per unit		$ 10
Sale of Limited Liability Company Units, number of units	14,059,136	120,000
Proceeds from sale of Limited Liability Company Units	$ 140,600,000	$ 1,200,000
Repurchase of units, number of units	87,650
Repurchase of units, value	$ 720,000
Unit issued			13,971,486	13,971,486
Unit outstanding			13,971,486	13,971,486
Reinvestment period			6 years

XML

Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Financing Receivables (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2012		Dec. 31, 2011
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance	$ 39		$ 3
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	39		3
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	14,542		16,309
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	14,542		16,309
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
Notes Receivable
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance	39		3
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	39		3
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	955	[1]	1,271	[2]
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	955		1,271
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
Finance Leases
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	13,587	[3]	15,038	[4]
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	13,587		15,038
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

[1] Includes $1 of unamortized initial direct costs.

[2] Includes $2 of unamortized initial direct costs.

[3] Includes $27 of unamortized initial direct costs.

[4] Includes $43 of unamortized initial direct costs.

XML

Non-recourse Debt - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Millions, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Gross operating lease rentals and future payments on direct financing leases	20.2
Carrying value of pledged assets	15.9
Minimum
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Fixed interest rate on note	4.71%
Note maturity year	2012
Maximum
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Fixed interest rate on note	6.66%
Note maturity year	2017

XML

Balance Sheets (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 4,733	$ 1,082
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $32 at September 30, 2012 and $112 at December 31, 2011	1,321	890
Notes receivable, net of unearned interest income of $145 and allowance for credit losses of $39 as of September 30, 2012 and unearned interest income of $210 and allowance for credit losses of $3 as of December 31, 2011	916	1,268
Due from Managing Member	9
Due from affiliates		8
Prepaid expenses and other assets	153	40
Investment in securities	73	70
Investments in equipment and leases, net of accumulated depreciation of $67,497 at September 30, 2012 and $70,135 at December 31, 2011	49,287	60,250
Total assets	56,492	63,608
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
Accrued distributions to Other Members		1,313
Other	615	530
Accrued interest payable	105	132
Interest rate swap contracts	111	249
Deposits due lessees	52	52
Non-recourse debt	18,166	21,851
Receivables funding program obligation	4,160	7,666
Unearned operating lease income	703	681
Total liabilities	23,912	32,474
Commitments and contingencies
Members' capital:
Managing Member
Other Members	32,580	31,134
Total Members' capital	32,580	31,134
Total liabilities and Members' capital	$ 56,492	$ 63,608

XML

Allowance for Credit Losses - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified				6 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012 Contract	Dec. 31, 2011 Contract	Sep. 30, 2012 Notes Receivable One	Jun. 30, 2012 Notes Receivable Two
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Number of notes receivable, non-accrual status	1	1
Accumulated adjustments to reflect fair value of non-accrual note			$ 12
Fair value adjustment on notes receivable				$ 27

XML

Statements of Changes in Members' Capital (Parenthetical) (USD $)	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Distributions to Other Members, per Unit	$ 0.25	$ 0.80

XML

Minimum Principal Repayment Schedule Under Program (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Long Term Debt Maturities Repayments Of Principal [Line Items]
Three months ending December 31, 2012	$ 1,335
Year ending December 31, 2013	4,689
2014	4,013
Balance	4,160	7,666
Receivables Funding Program
Long Term Debt Maturities Repayments Of Principal [Line Items]
Three months ending December 31, 2012	852
Year ending December 31, 2013	2,528
2014	780
Balance	$ 4,160	$ 7,666

XML

Other Income, Net (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Foreign currency gain (loss)	$ 44	$ 24	$ 32	$ (133)
Change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts	38	73	138	250
Total	$ 82	$ 97	$ 170	$ 117

XML

Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Carrying Amount
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 4,733	$ 1,082
Notes receivable	916	1,268
Investment in securities	73	70
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt	18,166	21,851
Borrowings	4,160	7,666
Interest rate swap contracts	111	249
Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	4,733	1,082
Notes receivable	916	1,268
Investment in securities	73	70
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt	19,090	22,962
Borrowings	4,160	7,666
Interest rate swap contracts	111	249
Estimated Fair Value | Level 1 Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	4,733
Estimated Fair Value | Level 2 Estimated Fair Value
Financial liabilities:
Interest rate swap contracts	111
Estimated Fair Value | Level 3 Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets:
Notes receivable	916
Investment in securities	73
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt	19,090
Borrowings	$ 4,160

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Summary of Geographic Information Relating to Sources, by Nation, of Company's Total Revenues and Long-lived Assets

The table below summarizes geographic information relating to the sources, by nation, of the Company’s total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 and long-lived tangible assets as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		% of Total			2011		% of Total
Revenue
United States	$	15,260		92	%	$	16,481		94	%
United Kingdom		664		4	%		753		4	%
Canada		678		4	%		301		2	%
Total International		1,342		8	%		1,054		6	%
Total	$	16,602		100	%	$	17,535		100	%

	As of September 30,					As of December 31,
	2012		% of Total			2011		% of Total
Long-lived assets
United States	$	45,807		93	%	$	55,822		93	%
United Kingdom		647		1	%		1,033		2	%
Canada		2,833		6	%		3,395		5	%
Total International		3,480		7	%		4,428		7	%
Total	$	49,287		100	%	$	60,250		100	%

Other Income, Net

The Company’s other income, net for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 consists of the following (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Foreign currency gain (loss)	$	44	$	24	$	32	$	(133	)
Change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts		38		73		138		250
Total	$	82	$	97	$	170	$	117

XML

Notes Receivable, Net - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified						6 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012 Notes Receivable One	Dec. 31, 2010 Notes Receivable One	Dec. 31, 2010 Notes Receivable One Modification	Jun. 30, 2012 Notes Receivable Two	Sep. 30, 2012 Notes Receivable Two	Sep. 30, 2012 Minimum	Sep. 30, 2012 Maximum
Accounts, Notes, Loans and Financing Receivable [Line Items]
Terms of the notes receivable								17 months	120 months
Notes receivable Interest rate				11.78%				8.44%	11.78%
Notes maturity Period								2012	2016
Net book value of notes receivable non-accrual status			$ 12				$ 100
Notes receivable principal payment date					2012-04
Adjustments to reflect fair value of non-accrual note	39	3	12
Fair value adjustment on notes receivable						27
Net investment in notes receivable placed in non-accrual status	$ 73	$ 24

XML

Allowance for Credit Losses (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Allowance for Credit Losses

The Company’s allowance for credit losses are as follows (in thousands):

	Accounts Receivable Allowance for Doubtful Accounts								Valuation Adjustments on Financing Receivables				Total Allowance for Credit Losses
	Notes Receivable			Finance Leases		Operating Leases			Notes Receivable		Finance Leases
Balance December 31, 2010	$	25		$	—	$	37		$	—	$	—	$	62
(Reversal of provision) Provision		(25	)		10		65			3		—		53
Balance December 31, 2011		—			10		102			3		—		115
(Reversal of provision) Provision		—			—		(80	)		36		—		(44	)
Balance September 30, 2012	$	—		$	10	$	22		$	39	$	—	$	71

Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Financing Receivables

As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company’s allowance for credit losses (related solely to financing receivables) and its recorded investment in financing receivables were as follows (in thousands):

September 30, 2012	Notes Receivable		Finance Leases		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance	$	39	$	—	$	39
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	39	$	—	$	39
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	$	9551	$	13,5872	$	14,542
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	955	$	13,587	$	14,542
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—

¹ Includes $1 of unamortized initial direct costs.

² Includes $27 of unamortized initial direct costs.

December 31, 2011	Notes Receivable		Finance Leases		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance	$	3	$	—	$	3
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	3	$	—	$	3
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	$	1,2713	$	15,0384	$	16,309
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,271	$	15,038	$	16,309
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—

³ Includes $2 of unamortized initial direct costs.

⁴ Includes $43 of unamortized initial direct costs.

Financing Receivables By Credit Quality Indicator and Class

At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company’s financing receivables by credit quality indicator and by class of financing receivables are as follows (excludes initial direct costs) (in thousands):

	Notes Receivable				Finance Leases
	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011		September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Pass	$	100	$	169	$	13,524	$	14,922
Special mention		854		1,100		36		73
Substandard		—		—		—		—
Doubtful		—		—		—		—
Total	$	954	$	1,269	$	13,560	$	14,995

Impaired Loans

As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company’s impaired loans were as follows (in thousands):

	Impaired Loans
At September 30, 2012	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded
Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
With an allowance recorded
Notes receivable		73		112		39		112		—
Total	$	73	$	112	$	39	$	112	$	—

	Impaired Loans
At December 31, 2011	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded
Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
With an allowance recorded
Notes receivable		21		24		3		24		—
Total	$	21	$	24	$	3	$	24	$	—

Net Investment in Financing Receivables by Age

At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the investment in financing receivables is aged as follows (in thousands):

September 30, 2012	30 – 59 Days Past Due		60 – 89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment >90 Days and Accruing
Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	954	$	954	$	—
Finance leases		7		—		37		44		13,516		13,560		—
Total	$	7	$	—	$	37	$	44	$	14,470	$	14,514	$	—

December 31, 2011	30 – 59 Days Past Due		60 – 89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment >90 Days and Accruing
Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,269	$	1,269	$	—
Finance leases		36		—		1		37		14,958		14,995		1
Total	$	36	$	—	$	1	$	37	$	16,227	$	16,264	$	1

XML

Statements of Cash Flows (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Operating activities:
Net income	$ 2,220	$ 966	$ 5,222	$ 2,860
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes	(309)	(123)	(741)	(881)
Gain from settlement of lease asset casualty	(350)		(350)
Depreciation of operating lease assets	2,113	3,021	7,189	9,826
Amortization of initial direct costs	28	44	92	161
Impairment losses on equipment	338	124	430	224
(Reversal of provision) provision for credit losses	(23)	7	(44)	(10)
Provision for losses on investment in securities			29	96
Change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts	(38)	(73)	(138)	(250)
Gain on sales or dispositions of securities		(1)	(1)	(42)
Unrealized gain on net exercise of warrants			(31)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	151		89	1,027
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(26)	(15)	(113)	20
Due from affiliates		(3)		(3)
Due from Managing Member	(9)	(213)	(9)	(213)
Accounts payable, Managing Member	(145)	27	106	70
Accounts payable, other	130	(396)	85	(44)
Accrued interest payable	(7)	(4)	(27)	(22)
Deposits due lessees				(38)
Unearned operating lease income	(154)	(46)	22	(386)
Net cash provided by operating activities	3,919	3,315	11,810	12,395
Investing activities:
Purchases of equipment on operating leases		(4,455)		(7,057)
Improvements to direct financing lease equipment				(34)
Proceeds from sales of lease assets and early termination of notes	1,117	710	2,429	3,602
Payments of initial direct costs		(30)		(33)
Principal payments received on direct financing leases	514	463	1,475	1,583
Proceeds from sales or dispositions of securities		18		111
Principal payments received on notes receivable	111	108	315	337
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	1,742	(3,186)	4,219	(1,491)
Financing activities:
Borrowings under acquisition facility			500
Repayments under acquisition facility			(500)
Repayments under non-recourse debt	(1,239)	(1,176)	(3,685)	(3,512)
Repayments under receivables funding program	(996)	(1,551)	(3,506)	(5,388)
Settlement of amount due from affiliate (transfer of lease assets)			8
Net cash used in financing activities	(6,011)	(5,748)	(12,378)	(17,969)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(350)	(5,619)	3,651	(7,065)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	5,083	7,347	1,082	8,793
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	4,733	1,728	4,733	1,728
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest	394	541	1,311	1,755
Cash paid during the period for taxes	4	7	98	84
Schedule of non-cash transactions:
Improvements to operating lease equipment		76		76
Amount due from settlement of lease asset casualty	440		440
Other Members
Financing activities:
Distributions to Members	(3,493)	(2,795)	(4,806)	(8,389)
Schedule of non-cash transactions:
Distributions declared and payable at period-end		1,313		1,313
Managing Member
Financing activities:
Distributions to Members	(283)	(226)	(389)	(680)
Schedule of non-cash transactions:
Distributions declared and payable at period-end		$ 106		$ 106

XML

Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Accounts receivable, allowance for doubtful accounts	$ 32	$ 112
Notes receivable, unearned interest income	145	210
Notes receivable, allowance for credit losses	39	3
Investments in equipment and leases, accumulated depreciation	$ 67,497	$ 70,135

XML

Commitments

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Commitments

10. Commitments:

At September 30, 2012, there were no commitments to purchase lease assets or fund investments in notes receivable.

XML

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Oct. 31, 2012
Document Information [Line Items]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2012
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Entity Registrant Name	ATEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND X LLC
Entity Central Index Key	0001186258
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Units Outstanding		13,971,486

XML

Guarantees

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Guarantees

11. Guarantees:

The Company enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Company’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. However, the Company has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.

The Managing Member knows of no facts or circumstances that would make the Company’s contractual commitments outside standard mutual covenants applicable to commercial transactions between businesses. Accordingly, the Company believes that these indemnification obligations are made in the ordinary course of business as part of standard commercial and industry practice, and that any potential liability under the Company’s similar commitments is remote. Should any such indemnification obligation become payable, the Company would separately record and/or disclose such liability in accordance with GAAP.

XML

Statements of Income (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Leasing and lending activities:
Operating leases	$ 4,022	$ 4,196	$ 12,611	$ 13,198
Direct financing leases	850	1,033	2,590	3,224
Interest on notes receivable	18	30	64	99
Gain on sales of lease assets and early termination of notes	309	123	741	881
Gain from settlement of lease asset casualty	350		350
Gain on sales or dispositions of securities		1	1	42
Unrealized gain on net exercise of warrants			31
Other	119	49	214	91
Total revenues	5,668	5,432	16,602	17,535
Expenses:
Depreciation of operating lease assets	2,113	3,021	7,189	9,826
Asset management fees to Managing Member and/or affiliates	145	59	619	540
Acquisition expense		88		293
Cost reimbursements to Managing Member and/or affiliates	319	362	1,242	1,095
Amortization of initial direct costs	28	44	92	161
Interest expense	386	537	1,283	1,733
Impairment losses on equipment	338	124	430	224
(Reversal of provision) provision for credit losses	(23)	7	(44)	(10)
Provision for losses on investment in securities			29	96
Professional fees	37	27	154	155
Franchise fees and taxes	33	21	89	64
Outside services	13	17	45	43
Other	141	256	422	572
Total operating expenses	3,530	4,563	11,550	14,792
Other income, net	82	97	170	117
Net income	2,220	966	5,222	2,860
Net income:
Managing Member		226	283	680
Other Members	2,220	740	4,939	2,180
Net income	$ 2,220	$ 966	$ 5,222	$ 2,860
Net income per Limited Liability Company Unit (Other Members)	0.16	0.06	0.35	0.16
Weighted average number of Units outstanding	13,971,486	13,971,486	13,971,486	13,971,486

XML

Investment in Equipment and Leases, Net

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Investment in Equipment and Leases, Net

5. Investment in equipment and leases, net:

The Company’s investment in equipment leases consists of the following (in thousands):

	Balance December 31, 2011		Reclassifications, Additions/ Dispositions and Impairment Losses			Depreciation/ Amortization Expense or Amortization of Leases			Balance September 30, 2012
Net investment in operating leases	$	43,913	$	(1,804	)	$	(7,189	)	$	34,920
Net investment in direct financing leases		14,995		40			(1,475	)		13,560
Assets held for sale or lease, net		1,121		(444	)		—			677
Initial direct costs, net of accumulated amortization of $359 at September 30, 2012 and $526 at December 31, 2011		221		—			(91	)		130
Total	$	60,250	$	(2,208	)	$	(8,755	)	$	49,287

Additions to net investment in operating leases are stated at cost. IDC amortization expense related to operating leases and direct financing leases totaled $28 thousand and $44 thousand for the respective three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and $91 thousand and $160 thousand for the respective nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (See Note 3).

Impairment of investments in leases and assets held for sale or lease:

Management periodically reviews the carrying values of its assets on leases and assets held for lease or sale for impairment. Impairment losses are recorded as an adjustment to the net investment in operating leases. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company deemed certain lease equipment to be impaired and accordingly, recorded fair value adjustments of $338 thousand which reduced the cost basis of the impaired equipment. Year-to-date, the Company had recorded fair value adjustments totaling $430 thousand relative to impaired equipment. By comparison, the Company recorded $124 thousand and $224 thousand of fair value adjustments to reduce the cost basis of certain impaired off-lease assets during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.

The Company utilizes a straight line depreciation method for equipment in all of the categories currently in its portfolio of operating lease transactions. Depreciation expense on the Company’s equipment was approximately $2.1 million and $3.0 million for the respective three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and was approximately $7.2 million and $9.8 million for the respective nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

All of the leased property was acquired in the years beginning with 2003 through 2011.

As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there were no lease contracts placed in non-accrual status. As of the same dates, the Company has certain other leases that have related accounts receivables aged 90 days or more that have not been placed on non-accrual status. In accordance with Company policy, such receivables are fully reserved. Management continues to closely monitor these leases, and all other lease contracts, for any actual change in collectability status and indication of necessary valuation adjustments.

Operating leases:

Property on operating leases consists of the following (in thousands):

	Balance December 31, 2011			Additions			Reclassifications, Dispositions and Impairment Losses			Balance September 30, 2012
Transportation, rail	$	28,286		$	—		$	1,300		$	29,586
Transportation, other		28,829			—			(1,075	)		27,754
Materials handling		24,032			—			(8,150	)		15,882
Manufacturing		8,302			—			—			8,302
Construction		4,808			—			—			4,808
Aircraft		4,732			—			(341	)		4,391
Logging & lumber		4,125			—			(66	)		4,059
Petro/natural gas		2,446			—			—			2,446
Agriculture		1,509			—			(824	)		685
Data processing		937			—			(166	)		771
Research		368			—			(368	)		—
		108,374			—			(9,690	)		98,684
Less accumulated depreciation		(64,461	)		(7,189	)		7,886			(63,764	)
Total	$	43,913		$	(7,189	)	$	(1,804	)	$	34,920

The average estimated residual value for assets on operating leases was 22% of the assets’ original cost at both September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. There were no operating leases placed in non-accrual status as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Direct financing leases:

As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, investment in direct financing leases generally consists of manufacturing, mining, materials handling, construction and cleaning and maintenance equipment. The components of the Company’s investment in direct financing leases as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):

	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Total minimum lease payments receivable	$	18,962		$	22,900
Estimated residual values of leased equipment (unguaranteed)		3,762			3,805
Investment in direct financing leases		22,724			26,705
Less unearned income		(9,164	)		(11,710	)
Net investment in direct financing leases	$	13,560		$	14,995

There were no direct financing leases placed in non-accrual status as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

At September 30, 2012, the aggregate amounts of future minimum lease payments receivable are as follows (in thousands):

	Operating Leases		Direct Financing Leases		Total
Three months ending December 31, 2012	$	2,420	$	1,316	$	3,736
Year ending December 31, 2013		7,783		4,865		12,648
2014		4,693		4,602		9,295
2015		1,963		4,478		6,441
2016		515		3,699		4,214
2017		489		2		491
Thereafter		119		—		119
	$	17,982	$	18,962	$	36,944

XML

Allowance for Credit Losses

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Allowance for Credit Losses

4. Allowance for credit losses:

The Company’s allowance for credit losses are as follows (in thousands):

	Accounts Receivable Allowance for Doubtful Accounts								Valuation Adjustments on Financing Receivables				Total Allowance for Credit Losses
	Notes Receivable			Finance Leases		Operating Leases			Notes Receivable		Finance Leases
Balance December 31, 2010	$	25		$	—	$	37		$	—	$	—	$	62
(Reversal of provision) Provision		(25	)		10		65			3		—		53
Balance December 31, 2011		—			10		102			3		—		115
(Reversal of provision) Provision		—			—		(80	)		36		—		(44	)
Balance September 30, 2012	$	—		$	10	$	22		$	39	$	—	$	71

Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable represent the amounts billed under operating and direct financing lease contracts, and notes receivable which are currently due to the Company.

Allowances for doubtful accounts are typically established based upon their aging and historical charge off and collection experience and the creditworthiness of specifically identified lessees and borrowers, and invoiced amounts. Accounts receivable deemed uncollectible are generally charged off against the allowance on a specific identification basis. Recoveries of amounts that were previously written-off are recorded as other income in the period received.

Accounts receivable are generally placed in a non-accrual status (i.e., no revenue is recognized) when payments are more than 90 days past due. Additionally, management periodically reviews the creditworthiness of companies with lease or note payments outstanding less than 90 days. Based upon management’s judgment, such leases or notes may be placed in non-accrual status. Leases or notes placed on non-accrual status are only returned to an accrual status when the account has been brought current and management believes recovery of the remaining unpaid receivable is probable. Until such time, revenues on operating leases are recognized on a cash basis. All payments received on amounts billed under direct financing leases contracts and notes receivable are applied only against outstanding principal balances.

Financing receivables

In addition to the allowance established for delinquent accounts receivable, the total allowance related solely to financing receivables also includes anticipated impairment charges on notes receivable and direct financing leases.

Notes are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and/or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the note agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest when due. If it is determined that a loan is impaired with regard to scheduled payments, the Company will perform an analysis of the note to determine if an impairment valuation reserve is necessary. This analysis considers the estimated cash flows from the note, or the collateral value of the property underlying the note when note repayment is collateral dependent. Any required valuation reserve is charged to earnings when determined; and notes are charged off to the allowance as they are deemed uncollectible.

The asset underlying a direct financing lease contract is considered impaired if the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset are less than its net book value. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows are the sum of the estimated residual value of the asset at the end of the asset’s expected holding period and estimates of undiscounted future rents. The residual value assumes, among other things, that the asset is utilized normally in an open, unrestricted and stable market. Short-term fluctuations in the market place are disregarded and it is assumed that there is no necessity either to dispose of a significant number of the assets, if held in quantity, simultaneously or to dispose of the asset quickly.

As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company’s allowance for credit losses (related solely to financing receivables) and its recorded investment in financing receivables were as follows (in thousands):

September 30, 2012	Notes Receivable		Finance Leases		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance	$	39	$	—	$	39
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	39	$	—	$	39
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	$	9551	$	13,5872	$	14,542
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	955	$	13,587	$	14,542
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—

¹ Includes $1 of unamortized initial direct costs.

² Includes $27 of unamortized initial direct costs.

December 31, 2011	Notes Receivable		Finance Leases		Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance	$	3	$	—	$	3
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	3	$	—	$	3
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—
Financing receivables:
Ending balance	$	1,2713	$	15,0384	$	16,309
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,271	$	15,038	$	16,309
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—	$	—	$	—

³ Includes $2 of unamortized initial direct costs.

⁴ Includes $43 of unamortized initial direct costs.

The Company evaluates the credit quality of its financing receivables on a scale equivalent to the following quality indicators related to corporate risk profiles:

Pass – Any account whose lessee/debtor, co-lessee/debtor or any guarantor has a credit rating on publicly traded or privately placed debt issues as rated by Moody’s or S&P for either Senior Unsecured debt, Long Term Issuer rating or Issuer rating that are in the tiers of ratings generally recognized by the investment community as constituting an Investment Grade credit rating; or, has been determined by the Manager to be an Investment Grade Equivalent or High Quality Corporate Credit per its Credit Policy or has a Not Rated internal rating by the Manager and the account is not considered by the Chief Credit Officer of the Manager to fall into one of the three risk profiles below.

Special Mention – Any traditional corporate type account with potential weaknesses (e.g. large net losses or major industry downturns) or, any growth capital account that has less than three months of cash as of the end of the calendar quarter to fund their continuing operations. These accounts deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, those potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the Fund’s receivable at some future date.

Substandard – Any account that is inadequately protected by the current worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Accounts that are so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Fund will sustain some loss as the likelihood of fully collecting all receivables may be questionable if the deficiencies are not corrected. Such accounts are on the Manager’s Credit Watch List.

Doubtful – Any account where the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. Accordingly, an account that is so classified is on the Manager’s Credit Watch List, and has been declared in default and the Manager has repossessed, or is attempting to repossess, the equipment it financed. This category includes impaired notes and leases as applicable.

At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company’s financing receivables by credit quality indicator and by class of financing receivables are as follows (excludes initial direct costs) (in thousands):

	Notes Receivable				Finance Leases
	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011		September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011
Pass	$	100	$	169	$	13,524	$	14,922
Special mention		854		1,100		36		73
Substandard		—		—		—		—
Doubtful		—		—		—		—
Total	$	954	$	1,269	$	13,560	$	14,995

As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company’s impaired loans were as follows (in thousands):

	Impaired Loans
At September 30, 2012	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded
Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
With an allowance recorded
Notes receivable		73		112		39		112		—
Total	$	73	$	112	$	39	$	112	$	—

	Impaired Loans
At December 31, 2011	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded
Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
With an allowance recorded
Notes receivable		21		24		3		24		—
Total	$	21	$	24	$	3	$	24	$	—

At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the investment in financing receivables is aged as follows (in thousands):

September 30, 2012	30 – 59 Days Past Due		60 – 89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment >90 Days and Accruing
Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	954	$	954	$	—
Finance leases		7		—		37		44		13,516		13,560		—
Total	$	7	$	—	$	37	$	44	$	14,470	$	14,514	$	—

December 31, 2011	30 – 59 Days Past Due		60 – 89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment >90 Days and Accruing
Notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,269	$	1,269	$	—
Finance leases		36		—		1		37		14,958		14,995		1
Total	$	36	$	—	$	1	$	37	$	16,227	$	16,264	$	1

As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had a note in non-accrual status which was considered impaired relative to its payment terms. Just prior to the end of the third quarter, past due amounts were received bringing the note current at September 30, 2012. Accordingly, the note was returned to accrual status effective October 1, 2012. Through June 30, 2012, the Company had accumulated $12 thousand of adjustments to reflect the fair value of such non-accrual note. No additional adjustment was recorded on the aforementioned note during the three months ended September 30, 2012.

During the second quarter of 2012, the Company deemed an additional note to be impaired and recorded a fair value adjustment of $27 thousand, which reduced the cost basis of such impaired note. As of September 30, 2012, such estimated impairment remained unchanged.

At September 30, 2012, there were no investments in financing receivables with related accounts receivable past due more than 90 days which were still on an accrual basis. As of December 31, 2011, certain net investments in financing receivables with related accounts receivable past due more than 90 days are still on an accrual basis based on management’s assessment of the collectability of such receivables. However, these accounts receivable are fully reserved and included in the allowance for doubtful accounts presented above.

XML

Notes Receivable, Net: (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Minimum Future Payments Receivable

As of September 30, 2012, the minimum future payments receivable are as follows (in thousands):

Three months ending December 31, 2012	$	141
Year ending December 31, 2013		384
2014		221
2015		165
2016		188
		1,099
Less: portion representing unearned interest income		(145	)
		954
Unamortized initial direct costs		1
Less: Reserve for impairment		(39	)
Notes receivable, net	$	916

Initial Direct Costs Amortization Expense Related to Notes Receivable and Operating and Direct Financing Leases

Initial direct costs (“IDC”) amortization expense related to notes receivable and the Company’s operating and direct financing leases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
IDC amortization – notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	1	$	1
IDC amortization – lease assets		28		44		91		160
Total	$	28	$	44	$	92	$	161

XML

Members' Capital

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Members' Capital

12. Members’ capital:

Units issued and outstanding were 13,971,486 at both September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The Company was authorized to issue up to 15,000,000 Units in addition to the Units issued to the initial members (50 Units). The Company ceased offering Units on March 11, 2005.

The Company has the right, exercisable in the Manager’s discretion, but not the obligation, to repurchase Units of a Unitholder who ceases to be a U.S. Citizen, for a price equal to 100% of the holder’s capital account. The Company is otherwise permitted, but not required, to repurchase Units upon a holder’s request. The repurchase of Fund units is made in accordance with Section 13 of the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement. The repurchase would be at the discretion of the Manager on terms it determines to be appropriate under given circumstances, in the event that the Manager deems such repurchase to be in the best interest of the Company; provided, the Company is never required to repurchase any Units. Upon the repurchase of any Units by the Fund, the tendered Units are cancelled. Units repurchased in prior periods were repurchased at amounts representing the original investment less cumulative distributions made to the Unitholder with respect to the Units. All Units repurchased during a quarter are deemed to be repurchased effective the last day of the preceding quarter, and are not deemed to be outstanding during, or entitled to allocations of net income, net loss or distributions for the quarter in which such repurchase occurs.

As defined in the Operating Agreement, the Company’s net income, net losses, and distributions, are to be allocated 92.5% to the Other Members and 7.5% to AFS. In accordance with the terms of the Operating Agreement, an additional allocation of income was made to AFS during the three months ended September 30, 2011 to bring AFS’s ending capital account balance to zero.

Distributions to the Other Members were as follows (in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Distributions declared	$	—	$	2,795	$	3,493	$	8,389
Weighted average number of Units outstanding		13,971,486		13,971,486		13,971,486		13,971,486
Weighted average distributions per Unit	$	—	$	0.20	$	0.25	$	0.60

XML

Borrowing Facilities

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Borrowing Facilities

8. Borrowing facilities:

The Company participates with AFS and certain of its affiliates in a revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) comprised of a working capital facility to AFS, an acquisition facility (the “Acquisition Facility”) and a warehouse facility (the “Warehouse Facility”) to AFS, the Company and affiliates, and a venture facility available to an affiliate with a syndicate of financial institutions which Credit Facility includes certain financial covenants. The Credit Facility is for an amount up to $60 million and expires in September 2013. The lending syndicate providing the Credit Facility has a blanket lien on all of the Company’s assets as collateral for any and all borrowings under the Acquisition Facility, and on a pro-rata basis under the Warehouse Facility.

As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, borrowings under the facility were as follows (in thousands):

	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Total amount available under the financing arrangement	$	60,000		$	75,000
Amount borrowed by the Company under the acquisition facility		—			—
Amounts borrowed by affiliated partnerships and limited liability companies under the working capital, acquisition and warehouse facilities		(1,025	)		(7,476	)
Total remaining available under the working capital, acquisition and warehouse facilities	$	58,975		$	67,524

The Company and its affiliates pay an annual commitment fee to have access to this line of credit. As of September 30, 2012, the aggregate amount of the Credit Facility is potentially available to the Company, subject to certain sub-facility and borrowing-base limitations. However, as amounts are drawn on the Credit Facility by each of the Company and the affiliates who are borrowers under the Credit Facility, the amount remaining available to all borrowers to draw under the Credit Facility is reduced. As the Warehousing Facility is a short term bridge facility, any amounts borrowed under the Warehousing Facility, and then repaid by the affiliated borrowers (including the Company) upon allocation of an acquisition to a specific purchaser, become available under the Warehouse Facility for further short term borrowing.

As of September 30, 2012, the Company’s Tangible Net Worth requirement under the Credit Facility was $15.0 million, the permitted maximum leverage ratio was not to exceed 1.25 to 1, and the required minimum interest coverage ratio was not to be less than 2 to 1. The Company was in compliance with these financial covenants under the Credit Facility with a minimum Tangible Net Worth, leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio, as calculated per the Credit Facility agreement of $32.7 million, 0.68 to 1, and 11.91 to 1, respectively, as of September 30, 2012. As such, as of September 30, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all material financial covenants, and with all other material conditions of the Credit Facility. The Company does not anticipate any covenant violations nor does it anticipate that any of these covenants will restrict its operations or its ability to procure additional financing.

Fee and interest terms

The interest rate on the Credit Facility is based on either the LIBOR/Eurocurrency rate of 1-, 2-, 3- or 6-month maturity plus a lender designated spread, or the bank’s Prime rate, which re-prices daily. Principal amounts of loans made under the Credit Facility that are prepaid may be re-borrowed on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth under the Credit Facility. At both September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the acquisition facility. During the first quarter of 2012, the Company borrowed and repaid $500 thousand. There were no borrowings subsequent to the first quarter of 2012. The weighted average rate on borrowings was 3.16% during the first nine months of 2012. There were no borrowings outstanding during the first nine months of 2011.

Warehouse facility

To hold the assets under the Warehousing Facility prior to allocation to specific investor programs, a Warehousing Trust has been entered into by the Company, AFS, ALC, and certain of the affiliated partnerships and limited liability companies. The Warehousing Trust is used by the Warehouse Facility borrowers to acquire and hold, on a short-term basis, certain lease transactions that meet the investment objectives of each of such entities. Each of the leasing programs sponsored by AFS and ALC is a pro rata participant in the Warehousing Trust, as described below. When a program no longer has a need for short term financing provided by the Warehousing Facility, it is removed from participation, and as new leasing investment entities are formed by AFS and ALC and commence their acquisition stages, these new entities are added.

As of September 30, 2012, the investment program participants were the Company, ATEL Capital Equipment Fund XI, LLC, ATEL 12, LLC, ATEL 14, LLC and ATEL 15, LLC. Pursuant to the Warehousing Trust, the benefit of the lease transaction assets, and the corresponding liabilities under the Warehouse Facility, inure to each of such entities based upon each entity’s pro-rata share in the Warehousing Trust estate. The “pro-rata share” is calculated as a ratio of the net worth of each entity over the aggregate net worth of all entities benefiting from the Warehousing Trust estate, excepting that the trustees, AFS and ALC, are both jointly and severally liable for the pro rata portion of the obligations of each of the affiliated partnerships and limited liability companies participating under the Warehouse Facility. Transactions are financed through this Warehouse Facility only until the transactions are allocated to a specific program for purchase or are otherwise disposed by AFS and ALC. When a determination is made to allocate the transaction to a specific program for purchase by the program, the purchaser repays the debt associated with the asset, either with cash or by means of proceeds of a draw under the Acquisition Facility, and the asset is removed from the Warehouse Facility collateral, and ownership of the asset and any debt obligation associated with the asset are assumed solely by the purchasing entity.

As of September 30, 2012, there were no borrowings under the Warehouse Facility. As of December 31, 2011, borrowings of $5.6 million were outstanding under such facility. The Company’s maximum contingent obligation on the outstanding warehouse balances at December 31, 2011 was approximately $1.5 million.

XML

Commitments - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2012
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Line Items]
Commitments to fund investments in notes receivable	$ 0

XML

Related Party Transactions

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Related Party Transactions

6. Related party transactions:

The terms of the Operating Agreement provide that AFS and/or affiliates are entitled to receive certain fees for equipment management and resale and for management of the Company.

The Operating Agreement allows for the reimbursement of costs incurred by AFS in providing administrative services to the Company. Administrative services provided include Company accounting, finance/treasury, investor relations, legal counsel and lease and equipment documentation. AFS is not reimbursed for services whereby it is entitled to receive a separate fee as compensation for such services, such as management of equipment. The Company would be liable for certain future costs to be incurred by AFS to manage the administrative services provided to the Company.

Each of ATEL Leasing Corporation (“ALC”) and AFS is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATEL Capital Group and performs services for the Company. Acquisition services, equipment management, lease administration and asset disposition services are performed by ALC; investor relations, communications services and general administrative services for the Company are performed by AFS.

Cost reimbursements to the Managing Member are based on its costs incurred in performing administrative services for the Company. These costs are allocated to each managed entity based on certain criteria such as managed assets, number of investors or contributed capital based upon the type of cost incurred. The Operating Agreement places an annual limit and a cumulative limit for cost reimbursements to AFS and/or affiliates. Any reimbursable costs incurred by AFS and/or affiliates during the year exceeding the annual and/or cumulative limits cannot be reimbursed in the current year, though such costs may be recovered in future years to the extent of the cumulative limit. As of September 30, 2012, the Company has not exceeded the annual and/or cumulative limitations discussed above.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, AFS and/or affiliates earned fees and commissions, and billed for reimbursements, pursuant to the Operating Agreement as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Costs reimbursed to Managing Member and/or affiliates	$	319	$	362	$	1,242	$	1,095
Asset management fees to Managing Member and/or affiliates		145		59		619		540
Acquisition and initial direct costs paid to Managing Member		—		96		—		304
	$	464	$	517	$	1,861	$	1,939

XML

Non-recourse Debt

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Non-recourse Debt

7. Non-recourse debt:

At September 30, 2012, non-recourse debt consists of notes payable to financial institutions. The notes are due in monthly installments. Interest on the notes is at fixed rates ranging from 4.71% to 6.66%. The notes are secured by assignments of lease payments and pledges of assets. At September 30, 2012, gross operating lease rentals and future payments on direct financing leases totaled approximately $20.2 million over the remaining lease terms; and the carrying value of the pledged assets is $15.9 million. The notes mature at various dates from 2012 through 2017.

The non-recourse debt does not contain any material financial covenants. The debt is secured by liens granted by the Company to the non-recourse lenders on (and only on) the discounted lease transactions. The lenders have recourse only to the following collateral: the specific leased equipment; the related lease chattel paper; the lease receivables; and proceeds of the foregoing items. The non-recourse obligation is payable solely out of the respective specific security and the Company does not guarantee (nor is the Company otherwise contractually responsible for) the payment of the non-recourse debt as a general obligation or liability of the Company. Although the Company does not have any direct or general liability in connection with the non-recourse debt apart from the security granted, the Company is directly and generally liable and responsible for certain representations, warranties, and covenants made to the lenders, such as warranties as to genuineness of the transaction parties' signatures, as to the genuineness of the respective lease chattel paper or the transaction as a whole, or as to the Company's good title to or perfected interest in the secured collateral, as well as similar representations, warranties and covenants typically provided by non-recourse borrowers and customary in the equipment finance industry, and are viewed by such industry as being consistent with non-recourse discount financing obligations. Accordingly, as there are no financial covenants or ratios imposed on the Company in connection with the non-recourse debt, the Company has determined that there are no material covenants with respect to the non-recourse debt that warrant footnote disclosure.

Future minimum payments of non-recourse debt are as follows (in thousands):

	Principal		Interest		Total
Three months ending December 31, 2012	$	1,335	$	294	$	1,629
Year ending December 31, 2013		4,689		954		5,643
2014		4,013		679		4,692
2015		4,208		410		4,618
2016		3,743		133		3,876
2017		178		1		179
	$	18,166	$	2,471	$	20,637

XML

Receivables Funding Program

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Receivables Funding Program

9. Receivables funding program:

As of September 30, 2012, the Company had amounts outstanding under an $80 million receivables funding program (the “RF Program”) with a receivables financing company that issued commercial paper rated A1 from Standard and Poor’s and P1 from Moody’s Investors Service. Under the RF Program, the lender holds liens against the Company’s assets. The lender is in a first position against certain specified assets and in either a subordinated or shared position against the remaining assets. The RF Program does not contain any credit risk related default contingencies and is scheduled to mature in July 2014 at which time advances under the RF Program are to be repaid in full.

The RF Program provides for borrowing at a variable interest rate and requires the Company to enter into interest rate swap agreements with certain hedge counterparties (also rated A1/P1) to mitigate the interest rate risk associated with each variable interest rate note. The RF Program allowed the Company to have a more cost effective means of obtaining debt financing than available for individual non-recourse debt transactions.

The Company had approximately $4.2 million and $7.7 million outstanding under the RF Program at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company paid program fees, as defined in the receivables funding agreement, totaling $4 thousand and $11 thousand, respectively. Such program fees paid amounted to $19 thousand and $37 thousand during the respective nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. The RF Program fees are included in interest expense in the Company’s statements of operations.

As of September 30, 2012, the Company has entered into interest rate swap agreements to receive or pay interest on a notional principal of $4.2 million based on the difference between nominal rates ranging from 3.21% to 5.39% and a variable rate of 0.24%. As of December 31, 2011, the Company has entered into interest rate swap agreements to receive or pay interest on a notional principal of $7.7 million based on the difference between nominal rates ranging from 3.21% to 5.39% and a variable rate of 0.25%. No actual borrowing or lending is involved. The termination of the swaps coincides with the maturity of the debt. Through the swap agreements, the interest rates have been effectively fixed. The differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change and is recognized currently as an adjustment to interest expense related to the debt. The interest rate swaps are not designated as hedging instruments and are carried at fair value on the balance sheet with unrealized gain/loss included in the statements of income in other income/(expense).

In conjunction with the RF Program, the lender under the RF Program has entered into an inter-creditor agreement with the lenders under the Credit Facility with the respect to priority and the sharing of collateral pools of the Company, including the Acquisition Facility and Warehouse Facility described in Note 8 above. Among the provisions of the inter-creditor agreement are cross-default provisions and acceleration provisions requiring payment before stated maturity in a default situation.

At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, borrowings and interest rate swap agreements under the RF Program are as follows (in thousands):

Date Borrowed	Original Amount Borrowed		Balance September 30, 2012		Notional Balance September 30, 2012		Swap Value September 30, 2012			Payment Rate On Interest Swap Agreement
January 16, 2007	$	12,365	$	278	$	278	$	(4	)		5.15	%
July 2, 2007		7,222		183		183		(7	)		5.39	%
September 19, 2007		6,874		588		588		(22	)		4.83	%
January 15, 2008		10,018		461		461		(10	)		3.58	%
March 27, 2008		5,410		1,343		1,343		(38	)		3.21	%
May 16, 2008		10,194		1,133		1,133		(26	)		3.69	%
May 28, 2008		5,470		174		174		(4	)		3.49	%
	$	57,553	$	4,160	$	4,160	$	(111	)

Date Borrowed	Original Amount Borrowed		Balance December 31, 2011		Notional Balance December 31, 2011		Swap Value December 31, 2011			Payment Rate On Interest Swap Agreement
January 16, 2007	$	12,365	$	994	$	994	$	(27	)		5.15	%
July 2, 2007		7,222		272		272		(15	)		5.39	%
September 19, 2007		6,874		1,025		1,025		(45	)		4.83	%
January 15, 2008		10,018		885		885		(25	)		3.58	%
March 27, 2008		5,410		2,024		2,024		(66	)		3.21	%
May 16, 2008		10,194		2,098		2,098		(62	)		3.69	%
May 28, 2008		5,470		368		368		(9	)		3.49	%
	$	57,553	$	7,666	$	7,666	$	(249	)

At September 30, 2012, the minimum principal repayment schedule under the Program is as follows (in thousands):

Three months ending December 31, 2012	$	852
Year ending December 31, 2013		2,528
2014		780
	$	4,160

At September 30, 2012, there are specific leases that are identified as collateral under the Program with expected future lease receivables of approximately $4.7 million at their discounted present value. During the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the weighted average interest rates on the RF Program, including interest on the swap contracts, were 5.37% and 5.04%, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the weighted average interest rates were 5.45% and 4.90%, respectively. The RF Program discussed above includes certain financial and non-financial covenants applicable to the Company as borrower. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

XML

Fair Value Measurement of Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on Recurring and Non-recurring Basis (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Impaired lease and off-lease assets	$ 204
Impaired off-lease assets		115
Impaired notes receivable, net	74	22
Impaired investment securities	10	8
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Interest rate swaps	111	249
Level 2 Estimated Fair Value | Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Interest rate swaps	111	249
Level 3 Estimated Fair Value | Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Impaired lease and off-lease assets	204
Impaired off-lease assets		115
Impaired notes receivable, net	74	22
Impaired investment securities	$ 10	$ 8

XML

Fair Value Measurements - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended			6 Months Ended	9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012 Investment Note	Dec. 31, 2011	Sep. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012 Investment Note	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Impairment losses on equipment	$ 338		$ 124		$ 430	$ 224
Impairment losses on investment securities					29	96
Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Impairment losses on equipment	338	36	124	92		224
Fair value adjustment on notes receivable				36	36		3
Number of impaired notes	2				2
Impairment losses on investment securities	$ 29				$ 29	$ 96
Impaired investment securities	2				2
Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring | Investment 1
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Percentage of fair value adjustment	(66.00%)		(87.00%)		(66.00%)	(87.00%)
Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring | Investment 2
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Percentage of fair value adjustment	(78.00%)		(66.00%)		(78.00%)	(66.00%)

XML

Summary of Geographic Information Relating to Sources, by Nation, of Company's Total Revenues and Long-lived Assets (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011
Revenues from External Customers and Long-Lived Assets [Line Items]
Revenues	$ 5,668	$ 5,432	$ 16,602	$ 17,535
Percentage of total revenue			100.00%	100.00%
Long-lived assets (net)	49,287		49,287		60,250
Percentage of long-lived assets (net)	100.00%		100.00%		100.00%
UNITED STATES
Revenues from External Customers and Long-Lived Assets [Line Items]
Revenues			15,260	16,481
Percentage of total revenue			92.00%	94.00%
Long-lived assets (net)	45,807		45,807		55,822
Percentage of long-lived assets (net)	93.00%		93.00%		93.00%
UNITED KINGDOM
Revenues from External Customers and Long-Lived Assets [Line Items]
Revenues			664	753
Percentage of total revenue			4.00%	4.00%
Long-lived assets (net)	647		647		1,033
Percentage of long-lived assets (net)	1.00%		1.00%		2.00%
CANADA
Revenues from External Customers and Long-Lived Assets [Line Items]
Revenues			678	301
Percentage of total revenue			4.00%	2.00%
Long-lived assets (net)	2,833		2,833		3,395
Percentage of long-lived assets (net)	6.00%		6.00%		5.00%
Total International
Revenues from External Customers and Long-Lived Assets [Line Items]
Revenues			1,342	1,054
Percentage of total revenue			8.00%	6.00%
Long-lived assets (net)	$ 3,480		$ 3,480		$ 4,428
Percentage of long-lived assets (net)	7.00%		7.00%		7.00%

XML

Aggregate Amounts of Future Minimum Lease Payments Receivable (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2012
Operating Leases
Three months ending December 31, 2012	$ 2,420
Year ending December 31, 2013	7,783
2014	4,693
2015	1,963
2016	515
2017	489
Thereafter	119
Operating Leases, Future Minimum Payments Receivable, Total	17,982
Direct Financing Leases
Three months ending December 31, 2012	1,316
Year ending December 31, 2013	4,865
2014	4,602
2015	4,478
2016	3,699
2017	2
Thereafter
Capital Leases, Future Minimum Payments Receivable, Total	18,962
Total
Three months ending December 31, 2012	3,736
Year ending December 31, 2013	12,648
2014	9,295
2015	6,441
2016	4,214
2017	491
Thereafter	119
Operating and Capital Leases, Future Minimum Payments, Receivable, Total	$ 36,944

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Basis of Presentation

Basis of presentation:

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q as mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of the Managing Member, necessary for a fair statement of financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no significant effect on the reported financial position or results of operations.

Footnote and tabular amounts are presented in thousands, except as to Units and per Unit data.

In preparing the accompanying unaudited financial statements, the Managing Member has reviewed events that have occurred after September 30, 2012, up until the issuance of the financial statements. No events were noted which would require disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements, and adjustments thereto.

Use of Estimates

Use of estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Such estimates primarily relate to the determination of residual values at the end of the lease term and expected future cash flows used for impairment analysis purposes and determination of the allowances for doubtful accounts and notes receivable.

Segment Reporting

Segment reporting:

The Company is not organized by multiple operating segments for the purpose of making operating decisions or assessing performance. Accordingly, the Company operates in one reportable operating segment in the United States.

The primary geographic regions in which the Company seeks leasing opportunities are North America and Europe. The table below summarizes geographic information relating to the sources, by nation, of the Company’s total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 and long-lived tangible assets as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (dollars in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		% of Total			2011		% of Total
Revenue
United States	$	15,260		92	%	$	16,481		94	%
United Kingdom		664		4	%		753		4	%
Canada		678		4	%		301		2	%
Total International		1,342		8	%		1,054		6	%
Total	$	16,602		100	%	$	17,535		100	%

	As of September 30,					As of December 31,
	2012		% of Total			2011		% of Total
Long-lived assets
United States	$	45,807		93	%	$	55,822		93	%
United Kingdom		647		1	%		1,033		2	%
Canada		2,833		6	%		3,395		5	%
Total International		3,480		7	%		4,428		7	%
Total	$	49,287		100	%	$	60,250		100	%

Investment in Securities

Investment in securities:

From time to time, the Company may purchase securities of its borrowers or receive warrants to purchase securities in connection with its lending arrangements.

Purchased securities

Purchased securities are generally not registered for public sale and are carried at cost. Such securities are adjusted to fair value if the fair value is less than the carrying value and such impairment is deemed by the Managing Member to be other than temporary. Factors considered by the Managing Member in determining fair value include, but are not limited to, available financial information, the issuer’s ability to meet its current obligations and indications of the issuer’s subsequent ability to raise capital. During the first six months of 2012, the Company had previously recorded fair value adjustments totaling $29 thousand to reduce the cost basis of certain investments deemed impaired. There were no additional fair value adjustments recorded during the third quarter of 2012. By contrast, during the first nine months of 2011, the Company recorded fair value adjustments totaling $96 thousand, all of which were recorded during the first quarter of 2011. Gains and/or losses recognized on sales or dispositions of securities were nominal for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, as well as for the first nine months of 2012. During the first nine months of 2011, realized gains amounted to $23 thousand.

Warrants

Warrants owned by the Company are not registered for public sale, but are considered derivatives and are carried at an estimated fair value on the balance sheet at the end of the period, as determined by the Managing Member. At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Managing Member estimated the fair value of the warrants to be nominal in amount. During the first six months of 2012, the Company recorded $31 thousand of unrealized gains relative to the conversion of warrants associated with shares of a venture company. There were no unrealized gains recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. Further, there were no such unrealized gains during the preceding six months of 2011. Gains and/or losses recognized on the net exercise of certain warrants were nominal for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and for the first nine months of 2012. By contrast, realized gains amounted to $19 thousand during the first nine months of 2011.

Other Income, Net

Other income, net:

The Company’s other income, net for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 consists of the following (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Foreign currency gain (loss)	$	44	$	24	$	32	$	(133	)
Change in fair value of interest rate swap contracts		38		73		138		250
Total	$	82	$	97	$	170	$	117

Per Unit Data

Per Unit data:

Net income and distributions per Unit are based upon the weighted average number of Other Members’ Units outstanding during the period.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent accounting pronouncements:

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) (collectively the “Boards”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” ASU 2011-04 created a uniform framework for applying fair value measurement principles for companies around the world and clarified existing guidance in US GAAP. ASU 2011-04 is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2011 and shall be applied prospectively. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2011-04 effective January 1, 2012. The fair value measurement provisions of ASU 2011-04 had no material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

XML

Related Party Transactions (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Atel Financial Services and/ or Affiliates Earned Fees, Commissions, and Billed for Reimbursements Pursuant to Operating Agreement

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, AFS and/or affiliates earned fees and commissions, and billed for reimbursements, pursuant to the Operating Agreement as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Costs reimbursed to Managing Member and/or affiliates	$	319	$	362	$	1,242	$	1,095
Asset management fees to Managing Member and/or affiliates		145		59		619		540
Acquisition and initial direct costs paid to Managing Member		—		96		—		304
	$	464	$	517	$	1,861	$	1,939

XML

Property On Operating Leases (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended								9 Months Ended				9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012 Transportation, rail	Sep. 30, 2012 Transportation, other	Sep. 30, 2012 Materials handling	Sep. 30, 2012 Manufacturing	Dec. 31, 2011 Manufacturing	Sep. 30, 2012 Construction	Dec. 31, 2011 Construction	Sep. 30, 2012 Aircraft	Sep. 30, 2012 Logging & lumber	Sep. 30, 2012 Petro/natural gas	Dec. 31, 2011 Petro/natural gas	Sep. 30, 2012 Agricultural	Sep. 30, 2012 Data processing	Sep. 30, 2012 Research	Sep. 30, 2012 Property Plant and Equipment	Sep. 30, 2012 Accumulated Depreciation
Property Subject to or Available for Operating Lease [Line Items]
Balance December 31, 2011	$ 43,913	$ 28,286	$ 28,829	$ 24,032	$ 8,302	$ 8,302	$ 4,808	$ 4,808	$ 4,732	$ 4,125	$ 2,446	$ 2,446	$ 1,509	$ 937	$ 368	$ 108,374	$ (64,461)
Additions	(7,189)																(7,189)
Reclassifications, Dispositions and Impairment Losses	(1,804)	1,300	(1,075)	(8,150)					(341)	(66)			(824)	(166)	(368)	(9,690)	7,886
Balance September 30, 2012	$ 34,920	$ 29,586	$ 27,754	$ 15,882	$ 8,302	$ 8,302	$ 4,808	$ 4,808	$ 4,391	$ 4,059	$ 2,446	$ 2,446	$ 685	$ 771		$ 98,684	$ (63,764)

XML

Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Financing Receivables (Parenthetical) (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Financing Receivable, Allowance for Credit Losses [Line Items]
Notes Receivable unamortized initial direct cost	$ 1	$ 2
Finance Leases unamortized initial direct cost	$ 27	$ 43

XML

Statements of Changes in Members' Capital (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended	9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2011
Beginning Balance		$ 31,134	$ 38,916	$ 38,916
Distributions to Other Members ($0.25 per Unit in 2012 $0.80 per Unit in 2011 )		(3,493)	(8,389)	(11,184)
Distributions to Managing Member		(283)		(906)
Net income	2,220	5,222	2,860	4,308
Ending Balance	32,580	32,580		31,134
Other Members Capital
Beginning Balance (In Units)		13,971,486	13,971,486	13,971,486
Ending Balance (In Units)	13,971,486	13,971,486		13,971,486
Beginning Balance		31,134	38,916	38,916
Distributions to Other Members ($0.25 per Unit in 2012 $0.80 per Unit in 2011 )		(3,493)		(11,184)
Net income		4,939		3,402
Ending Balance	32,580	32,580		31,134
Managing Member Capital
Distributions to Managing Member		(283)		(906)
Net income		$ 283		$ 906

XML

Notes Receivable, Net:

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Notes Receivable, Net:

3. Notes receivable, net:

The Company has various notes receivable from borrowers who have financed the purchase of equipment through the Company. The terms of the notes receivable are 17 to 120 months and bear interest at rates ranging from 8.44% to 11.78%. The notes are secured by the equipment financed. The notes mature from 2012 through 2016.

The Company had a note in non-accrual status at both September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The note was originally placed in non-accrual status in 2010, at which time its term was modified to defer the repayment of principal until April 2012 while maintaining interest-only payments at the original rate of 11.78%. From April 1, 2012 well into the third quarter, the interest only payment arrangement was continued pending a final resolution of the terms of repayment. Just prior to the end of the third quarter, past due amounts were received bringing the note current at September 30, 2012. Accordingly, the note was returned to accrual status effective October 1, 2012. As of September 30, 2012, the aforementioned note reflects a principal balance outstanding of $12 thousand. The Company had previously accumulated $12 thousand of adjustments to reflect the fair value of the non-accrual note. No incremental adjustment was recorded at September 30, 2012.

During the second quarter of 2012, an additional note was deemed to be impaired and placed in non-accrual status. As such, the Company recorded a fair value adjustment of $27 thousand which reduced the cost basis of the impaired note. As of September 30, 2012, such estimated impairment remained unchanged. As of the same date, the note reflects a principal balance outstanding of $100 thousand.

The net investment in notes receivable placed in non-accrual status totaled $73 thousand and $24 thousand as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

As of September 30, 2012, the minimum future payments receivable are as follows (in thousands):

Three months ending December 31, 2012	$	141
Year ending December 31, 2013		384
2014		221
2015		165
2016		188
		1,099
Less: portion representing unearned interest income		(145	)
		954
Unamortized initial direct costs		1
Less: Reserve for impairment		(39	)
Notes receivable, net	$	916

Initial direct costs (“IDC”) amortization expense related to notes receivable and the Company’s operating and direct financing leases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
IDC amortization – notes receivable	$	—	$	—	$	1	$	1
IDC amortization – lease assets		28		44		91		160
Total	$	28	$	44	$	92	$	161

XML

Borrowings and Interest Rate Swap Agreements under RF Program (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Balance	$ 4,160	$ 7,666
Receivables Funding Program
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Original Amount Borrowed	57,553	57,553
Balance	4,160	7,666
Notional Balance	4,160	7,666
Swap Value	(111)	(249)
January 16, 2007 | Receivables Funding Program
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Date Borrowed	Jan. 16, 2007	Jan. 16, 2007
Original Amount Borrowed	12,365	12,365
Balance	278	994
Notional Balance	278	994
Swap Value	(4)	(27)
Payment Rate On Interest Swap Agreement	5.15%	5.15%
July 2, 2007 | Receivables Funding Program
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Date Borrowed	Jul. 02, 2007	Jul. 02, 2007
Original Amount Borrowed	7,222	7,222
Balance	183	272
Notional Balance	183	272
Swap Value	(7)	(15)
Payment Rate On Interest Swap Agreement	5.39%	5.39%
September 19, 2007 | Receivables Funding Program
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Date Borrowed	Sep. 19, 2007	Sep. 19, 2007
Original Amount Borrowed	6,874	6,874
Balance	588	1,025
Notional Balance	588	1,025
Swap Value	(22)	(45)
Payment Rate On Interest Swap Agreement	4.83%	4.83%
January 15, 2008 | Receivables Funding Program
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Date Borrowed	Jan. 15, 2008	Jan. 15, 2008
Original Amount Borrowed	10,018	10,018
Balance	461	885
Notional Balance	461	885
Swap Value	(10)	(25)
Payment Rate On Interest Swap Agreement	3.58%	3.58%
March 27, 2008 | Receivables Funding Program
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Date Borrowed	Mar. 27, 2008	Mar. 27, 2008
Original Amount Borrowed	5,410	5,410
Balance	1,343	2,024
Notional Balance	1,343	2,024
Swap Value	(38)	(66)
Payment Rate On Interest Swap Agreement	3.21%	3.21%
May 16, 2008 | Receivables Funding Program
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Date Borrowed	May 16, 2008	May 16, 2008
Original Amount Borrowed	10,194	10,194
Balance	1,133	2,098
Notional Balance	1,133	2,098
Swap Value	(26)	(62)
Payment Rate On Interest Swap Agreement	3.69%	3.69%
May 28, 2008 | Receivables Funding Program
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Date Borrowed	May 28, 2008	May 28, 2008
Original Amount Borrowed	5,470	5,470
Balance	174	368
Notional Balance	174	368
Swap Value	$ (4)	$ (9)
Payment Rate On Interest Swap Agreement	3.49%	3.49%

XML

Non-recourse Debt (Tables)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Future Minimum Payments of Non-Recourse Debt

Future minimum payments of non-recourse debt are as follows (in thousands):

	Principal		Interest		Total
Three months ending December 31, 2012	$	1,335	$	294	$	1,629
Year ending December 31, 2013		4,689		954		5,643
2014		4,013		679		4,692
2015		4,208		410		4,618
2016		3,743		133		3,876
2017		178		1		179
	$	18,166	$	2,471	$	20,637

XML

Initial Direct Costs Amortization Expense Related to Notes Receivable and Operating and Direct Financing Leases (Detail) (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2012	Sep. 30, 2011
Initial Direct Costs, Notes Receivable and Lease Assets [Line Items]
Amortization of initial direct costs	$ 28	$ 44	$ 92	$ 161
Notes Receivable
Initial Direct Costs, Notes Receivable and Lease Assets [Line Items]
Amortization of initial direct costs			1	1
Lease Assets
Initial Direct Costs, Notes Receivable and Lease Assets [Line Items]
Amortization of initial direct costs	$ 28	$ 44	$ 91	$ 160

XML

Fair Value Measurements

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Fair Value Measurements

13. Fair value measurements:

Fair value measurements and disclosures are based on a fair value hierarchy as determined by significant inputs used to measure fair value. The three levels of inputs within the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis, generally on a national exchange.

Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in the market.

Level 3 – Valuation is modeled using significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. These unobservable inputs reflect the Company's own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, only the fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap contracts was measured on a recurring basis. During the first nine months of 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded non-recurring adjustments to reflect the fair value of impaired lease and off-lease assets, notes receivable and investment securities. Amounts at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 reflect the fair value of the then existing impaired assets.

The Company’s valuation policy is determined by members of the Asset Management, Credit and Accounting departments. Whenever possible, the policy is to obtain quoted market prices in active markets to estimate fair values for recognition and disclosure purposes. Where quoted market prices in active markets are not available, fair values are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, broker quotes, information from third party remarketing agents, third party appraisals of collateral and/or other valuation techniques. These techniques are significantly affected by certain of the Company’s assumptions, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows. Potential taxes and other transaction costs are not considered in estimating fair values. As the Company is responsible for determining fair value, an analysis is performed on prices obtained from third parties. Such analysis is performed by asset management and credit department personnel who are familiar with the Company’s investments in equipment, notes receivable and equity securities of venture companies. The analysis may include a periodic review of price fluctuations and validation of numbers obtained from a specific third party by reference to multiple representative sources.

Such fair value adjustments utilized the following methodology:

Interest rate swaps

The fair value of interest rate swaps is estimated using a valuation method (discounted cash flow) with inputs that are defined or that can be corroborated by observable market data. The discounted cash flow approach utilizes each swap’s notional amount, payment and termination dates, swap coupon, and the prevailing market rate and pricing data to determine the present value of the future swap payments. Accordingly, such swap contracts are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.

Impaired lease and/or off-lease equipment

During the third quarter of 2012, the Company deemed certain lease equipment (assets) to be impaired and recorded fair value adjustments of $338 thousand to reduce the cost basis of the equipment. Such fair value adjustments were in addition to those recorded to off-lease equipment during the first half of 2012 totaling $92 thousand. The adjustments were non-recurring. Under the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the fair value of impaired lease assets were classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy as the data sources utilized for the valuation of such assets reflect significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. Such valuation utilizes a market approach technique and uses inputs that reflect the sales price of similar assets sold by affiliates and/or information from third party remarketing agents not readily available in the market.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded non–recurring fair value adjustments totaling $124 thousand and $224 thousand, respectively, to reduce the cost basis of certain impaired lease and off-lease equipment. The fair values of the impaired equipment were classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. An additional $36 thousand of fair value adjustments were recorded through December 31, 2011.

Impaired notes receivable

The fair value of the Company’s notes receivable is estimated using either third party appraisals of collateral or discounted cash flow analyses based upon current market rates for similar types of lending arrangements, with adjustments for impaired loans as deemed necessary. During the first nine months of 2012, the Company recorded $36 thousand of adjustments to reflect the fair value of two impaired notes, all of which were recorded during the first half of the year. The Company originally deemed one of the notes impaired in 2011 and had previously recorded $3 thousand of adjustments through December 2011. Such adjustments were non-recurring and were based upon an independent appraisal of the underlying collateral. Under the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the fair value of the impaired notes receivable is classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Such valuation utilizes a market approach technique and uses inputs from third party appraisers that utilize current market transactions as adjusted for certain factors specific to the underlying collateral.

Impaired investment securities

The Company’s investment securities are not registered for public sale and are carried at cost. The investment securities are adjusted for impairment, if any, based upon factors which include, but are not limited to, available financial information, the issuer’s ability to meet its current obligations and indications of the issuer’s subsequent ability to raise capital. During the first six months of 2012, the Company recorded fair value adjustments totaling $29 thousand which reduced the cost basis of two impaired investment securities. The adjustments reflected an approximate 66% reduction in valuation for one investment as determined by investee cash burn and potential necessity for additional venture investors, and a 78% decrease in valuation of the second investment based on subsequent price of unit sale. There were no additional adjustments recorded on the aforementioned impaired securities during the third quarter of 2012.

During the first nine months of 2011, such fair value adjustments totaled $96 thousand all of which was recorded during the first quarter of 2011. The non-recurring fair value adjustments reflected an approximate 87% reduction in valuation of one impaired investment as determined by investee cash burn and potential for additional venture investors, and an approximate 66% reduction in valuation of the second impaired investment as determined by cash payments received in a private transaction whereby the Fund liquidated its warrant position. Such transaction was pursuant to the investee’s acquisition by a third party. There was no incremental impairment to investment securities through December 31, 2011.

Under the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the fair value of the aforementioned impaired investment securities were classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy for all measurement periods due to the significant inputs that are unobservable in the market.

The following table presents the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis and the level within the hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

	September 30, 2012		Level 1 Estimated Fair Value		Level 2 Estimated Fair Value		Level 3 Estimated Fair Value
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired lease and off-lease assets	$	204	$	—	$	—	$	204
Impaired notes receivable, net		74		—		—		74
Impaired investment securities		10		—		—		10
Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Interest rate swaps	$	111	$	—	$	111	$	—

	December 31, 2011		Level 1 Estimated Fair Value		Level 2 Estimated Fair Value		Level 3 Estimated Fair Value
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired off-lease assets	$	115	$	—	$	—	$	115
Impaired notes receivable, net		22		—		—		22
Impaired investment securities		8		—		—		8
Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Interest rate swaps	$	249	$	—	$	249	$	—

The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the guidance provided by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Fair value estimates, methods and assumptions, set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments, are made solely to comply with the requirements of the Financial Instruments Topic and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and related notes.

The Company has determined the estimated fair value amounts by using market information and valuation methodologies that it considers appropriate and consistent with the fair value accounting guidance. Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Cash and cash equivalents

The recorded amounts of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value because of the liquidity and short-term maturity of these instruments.

Notes receivable

The fair value of the Company’s notes receivable is estimated using either third party appraisals of collateral or discounted cash flow analyses based upon current market rates for similar types of lending arrangements, with adjustments for impaired loans as deemed necessary.

Investment in securities

The Company’s investment securities are not registered for public sale and are carried at cost which management believes approximates fair value, as appropriately adjusted for impairment.

Non-recourse debt

The fair value of the Company’s non-recourse debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based upon current market borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Borrowings

Borrowings include the outstanding amounts on the Company’s acquisition facility and the RF Program. The carrying amount of these variable rate obligations approximate fair value based on current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowings.

Commitments and Contingencies

Management has determined that no recognition for the fair value of the Company’s loan commitments is necessary because their terms are made on a market rate basis and require borrowers to be in compliance with the Company’s credit requirements at the time of funding.

The fair value of contingent liabilities (or guarantees) is not considered material because management believes there has been no event that has occurred wherein a guarantee liability has been incurred or will likely be incurred.

The following table presents a summary of the carrying value and fair value by level of financial instruments on the Company’s balance sheet at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2012
	Carrying Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4,733	$	4,733	$	—	$	—	$	4,733
Notes receivable, net		916		—		—		916		916
Investment in securities		73		—		—		73		73
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		18,166		—		—		19,090		19,090
Borrowings		4,160		—		—		4,160		4,160
Interest rate swap contracts		111		—		111		—		111

	December 31, 2011
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,082	$	1,082
Notes receivable		1,268		1,268
Investment in securities		70		70
Financial liabilities:
Non-recourse debt		21,851		22,962
Borrowings		7,666		7,666
Interest rate swap contracts		249		249