10QSB 1 a4845871.txt AEGIS ASSESSMENTS INC. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-QSB (Mark One) [X ] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended January 31, 2005 ------------- [ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT For the transition period from __________ to _____________ Commission file number 000-50213 AEGIS ASSESSMENTS, INC. (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter) Delaware 72-1525702 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) of incorporation or organization) 7975 N. Hayden Road, Suite D-363, Scottsdale, AZ 85258 (Address of principal executive offices) 480.778.9140 (Issuer's telephone number) Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS The number of shares of the issuer's common equity outstanding as of March 18, 2005 was approximately 25,386,891 shares of common stock, par value $.001. Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes [ ] No [X] INDEX TO FORM 10-QSB FILING FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Page Item 1. Financial Statements............................................. 1 Balance Sheet as of January 31, 2005....................... 1-2 Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Month Periods Ended January 31, 2005 and January 31, 2004........... 3 Statements of Cash Flows for the Three and Six month periods ended January 31, 2005 and January 31, 2004............................. 4-5 Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements................ 6-14 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis............................. 15 Item 3. Controls and Procedures........................................ 30 PART II OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings .............................................. 31 Item 2. Changes in Securities .......................................... 32 Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K................................ 35 SIGNATURES 35 PART I- FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AEGIS ASSESSMENTS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET JANUARY 31, 2005 (Unaudited) ASSETS Current Assets Cash $ 164,014 Accounts Receivable 18,545 Inventory 406,488 ------------ TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 589,047 Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $52,497 236,334 U.S. Treasury Bonds - Restricted (see Note 4) 5,000,000 Other Assets 14,616 ------------ TOTAL ASSETS $ 5,839,997 ============ LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Current Liabilities Accounts Payable $ 72,307 Accrued Payroll 112,567 Deferred Revenue 350,000 Notes Payable 55,714 ------------ TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 590,588 ------------ 1 AEGIS ASSESSMENTS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET JANUARY 31, 2005 (Unaudited) (CONTINUED) Series A 8% convertible preferred stock $.001 par value; 200,000 shares authorized Shareholders' equity: Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized for issuance in one or more series. Common stock $.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 26,450,003 shares issued and outstanding at January 31, 2005 26,451 Additional paid-in capital 19,882,153 Stock subscription receivable - related party (67,500) Stock subscription receivable (175,000) Deficit accumulated during the development stage (14,416,695) ------------ TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 5,249,409 ------------ TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 5,839,997 ============ The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements 2 AEGIS ASSESSMENTS, INC. (A Development Stage Company) CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
For the period For the three For the three For the six For the six from months ended months ended months ended months ended January 16,2002 January January January January (inception) to 31,2005 31,2004 31,2005 31,2004 January 31,2005 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ Revenue $ 6,000 -- $ 6,000 -- $ 18,545 Cost of equipment sold 4,500 4,500 8,100 General and administrative expenses - other $ 3,350,751 $ 434,843 3,893,651 $ 829,583 14,139,275 Consulting fees - related party 53,588 287,065 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Loss before provision for income taxes (3,349,251) (434,843) (3,892,151) (883,171) $(14,415,895) Provision for income taxes -- 800 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- NET LOSS $ (3,349,251) $ (434,843) $ (3,892,151) $ (883,171) $(14,416,695) ============================================================================ NET LOSS AVAILABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED $ (0.14) $ (0.03) $ (0.19) $ (0.07) $ (1.08) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES - BASIC AND DILUTED 23,112,141 13,035,883 20,875,174 12,553,770 13,379,163 ============================================================================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements 3 Aegis Assessments, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
For the period from For the six For the six January 16,2002 months ended months ended (inception) to January 31,2005 January 31,2004 January 31,2005 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) --------------- --------------- ------------------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss $ (3,892,151) $ (883,171) $(14,416,695) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Non-cash items included in the net loss: Depreciation 34,505 3,739 52,498 Amortization and expenses related to stock and stock options 2,824,565 364,927 11,053,125 The intrinsic value of non-detachable conversion rights of the Series A 8% preferred stock 9,800 Issuance of stock for payment of interest 1,184 3,266 Increase in Assets Accounts Receivable (6,000) (18,545) Inventory (210,088) (406,488) Increase in Other Assets (9,250) (14,616) Increase in Liabilities: Accrued payroll 96,148 (43,163) 112,567 Accounts payable 18,993 (7,243) 72,307 Accrued interest - officers (1,906) Deferred Revenue 350,000 Note Payable 53,381 55,714 ----------------- ----------------- -------------------- Net cash used in operating activities (1,080,647) (574,883) (3,147,067)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements 4 (CONTINUED) Aegis Assessments, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
For the period from For the six For the six January 16,2002 months ended months ended (inception) to January 31,2005 January 31,2004 January 31,2005 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) --------------- --------------- ---------------- Cash flows from operating activities: Cash flows used in investing activities: Payments to acquire property and equipment $ (30,475) $ (46,473) $ (288,831) Net cash flows used in investing activities (30,475) (46,473) (288,831) Cash flows provided by financing activities: Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock - 90,100 Proceeds from issuance of common stock - related party 22,500 Proceeds from issuance of common stock 554,405 556,175 2,774,407 Proceeds from exercise of warrants 184,654 103,708 630,405 Proceeds from exercise of options 38,500 38,500 Proceeds from issuance of debenture - 17,000 Proceeds from notes payable and advances - related parties 583 17,000 Stock subscription receivable - 10,000 ------------- --------------- ---------------- Net cash provided financing activities 777,559 660,466 3,599,912 Net increase in cash and cash equivalents (333,563) 39,110 164,014 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 497,577 32,932 - ------------- --------------- --------------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 164,014 $ 72,042 $ 164,014 ============= =============== =============== Exercise of options applied against notes $ 17,000 $ 17,000 ========= =============== Payment of accounts payable with stock $ 12,025 $ 12,025 ========= =============== Conversion of preferred stock to common stock $ 27,500 $ 27,500 ========= =============== Issuance of common stock for services $ 8,095,206 =============== Issuance of common stock for U.S. Treasury Bonds $5,000,000 ------------- Issuance of common stock for note - related party $ 67,500 ===============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements 5 Aegis Assessments, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) Notes To Financial Statements (unaudited) For The Six And Three Months Ended January 31, 2005 (Unaudited) and January 31, 2004 (Unaudited), For The Period January 16, 2002 (inception) Through January 31, 2005 This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, including the Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements, contains forward-looking statements. The words "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "intends", "projects", and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Such statements may include, but are not limited to, projections regarding demand for the Company's products, the impact of the Company's development and manufacturing processes on its research and development costs, future research and development expenditures, and the Company's ability to obtain new financing as well as assumptions related to the foregoing. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. 6 1. Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements include all adjustments management believes are necessary for a fair presentation of the Company's financial position at January 31, 2005 and results of operations for the periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. Results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The accompanying condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and footnotes as of and for the year ended July 31, 2004, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("US GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Management bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances. However, future events are subject to change and the best estimates and assumptions routinely require adjustment. US GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments in several areas including those related to the capitalization of development costs of the Company's software, the valuation of the recoverability of those costs, and the fair value of stock-based compensation. Actual results in these particular areas could differ from those estimates. 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies New Accounting Pronouncements In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standard board issued FAS 151 -"Inventory Costs-an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4." This Statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, "Inventory Pricing," to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). This Statement requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges in all cases. In addition, this Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The adoption of FAS 151 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company. Development Stage Operations Aegis Assessments, Inc. (a Development Stage Company) (the "Company") is a development stage company and has limited operating history with insignificant revenues. The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on January 16, 2002. As of July 31, 2004 the Company completed development of its core product, a specialized emergency response and communication systems for law enforcement agencies at all levels, the U.S. Department of Defense, and select commercial firms. The Company refers to this product as the "Aegis SafetyNet Radio Bridge or "Radio Bridge" system. The Company is now engaged in producing the systems and establishing sales distribution channels. Initial Production and Sales Activity In May 2004 the Company received its first purchase order for the Aegis SafetyNet Radio Bridge system and began production. The initial $2.4 million purchase order was accompanied by a progress payment of $350,000 against the first units. The progress payment was recorded as deferred revenue. The Company anticipates significant involvement in the distributor's resale activities and will not record revenue related to the units until they are sold to end-users. 7 An additional Radio Bridge was sold to the U.S. government for evaluation in June 2004. The sale was recorded and the receivable remains outstanding at January 31, 2005. Because the Company expects collection of this receivable, it does not believe an allowance for doubtful accounts is necessary at January 31, 2005. Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, whereby, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amount of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs. A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize tax assets through future operations. As of January 31, 2005, the Company has provided a 100% valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset, since management has not been able to determine that the realization of that asset is more likely than not. Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share The basic loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per common share is computed in the same way as basic loss per common share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would be outstanding if all potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. As of January 31, 2005, the Company had 6,068,200 outstanding stock options, and warrants that can be converted into 634,142 shares of common stock. The options and warrants would have an anti-dilutive effect and, therefore, are not included in diluted loss per share. 8 Property, Plant and Equipment Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and improvements are capitalized, and minor replacements, maintenance, and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the results of operations for the respective period. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes. The Company uses other depreciation methods, generally accelerated depreciation, for tax purposes where appropriate. The estimated useful lives for significant property and equipment categories are as follows: Office equipment 3 years Shop equipment 5 years Office furniture 7 years Product Demonstration Equipment 5 years Stock-Based Compensation The Company accounts for its two stock option plans and other stock-based employee compensation using the intrinsic value method and related interpretations, as described more fully in the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2004. Accordingly, compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only to the extent the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the option exercise price. Had compensation expense been determined based on the fair values at dates of grant for its stock options under the fair value approach, net loss and net loss per share would have been reported as indicated in the pro forma results below:
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended January 31, January 31, 2005 2004 2005 2004 ------------ ----------- ------------ ---------- Net loss, as reported $ (3,349,251) $ (434,843) $ (3,892,151) $ (883,171) Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reporting net loss Deduct: Stock based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based (231,000) (7,609) (231,000) (26,633) method ------------ ---------- ------------ --------------- Pro forma net loss $ (3,580,251) $ (442,452) $ (4,123,151) $ (909,804) Net loss per share, as reported (0.14) (0.03) (0.19) (0.07) Net loss per share, pro forma (0.15) (0.03) (0.20) (0.07)
9 The fair value under FAS 123 for options granted were estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: Expected life (years) 3 Interest rate 3.00% Volatility 0% Dividend yield 0 Research And Development And Software Development Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. The costs incurred for the development of computer software that will be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed are capitalized when technological feasibility has been established. These capitalized costs will be subject to an ongoing assessment of recoverability based on anticipated future revenues and changes in hardware and software technologies. Costs that will be capitalized include direct labor and related overhead. Amortization of capitalized software development costs will begin when the product is available for general release. No computer software costs are currently capitalized. Derivative Swap Transaction On November 23, 2004, the Company received $5,000,000 in U.S. Treasury bonds in a private placement of the Company's common stock. Subsequently, the Company entered into a derivative swap transaction in which the bonds, including the interest earned on the bonds during the 24-month period of the swap agreement, have been pledged as security. See Note 4 below. The accrued net obligation due under the agreement, if any, is periodically recorded as a liability. However, because accrued net amounts due the Company are not fully secured, a reserve for 100% of the net amount due the Company under the agreement in excess of the amount of the bonds has been established. As of January 31, 2005, the net amount due the Company, and the amount of the reserve, was $2,736,375. 3. Related Party Transactions In September 2004, a member of the board of directors exercised his option to acquire 20,000 shares for $.30 per share. On September 14, 2004, Ken Edge resigned as officer and director. Under terms of the Company's stock option plan, options held by employees expire if not exercised prior to termination of employment. Mr. Edge did not exercise his option and his 1.2 million options expired on September 14, 2004. On November 29, 2004, the Company borrowed $80,000 from a shareholder pursuant to a promissory note, with an interest rate of 10%. As additional consideration for entering into the note, the Company issued the shareholder 30,000 restricted shares of its common stack. On December 10, 2004, the Company issued options to acquire 2,310,000 common shares to a group including officers, directors, and employees. The option price is $1.20, the market price of the stock on the date of issue. 10 4. Stock Transactions Common Stock In July 2003, through a private placement the Company authorized 300,000 equity units, each of which consisted of one share of the Company's common stock, one warrant to acquire one share of the Company's common stock at $.50 per share, with an exercise period that expires six months after the purchase, and one warrant to acquire one share of the Company's common stock at $1.50 per share, with an exercise period that expires 18 months after purchase. As of January 31, 2005, a total of 254,667 of the units were sold for a total of $382,000, and 221,667 of the warrants were exercised for a total of $110,834. No units were sold and no warrants were exercised during the six months ended January 31, 2005. In October 2003, through a private placement the Company authorized the sale of 2,000,000 equity units for $1.50 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of common stock for $.50, with an exercise period that expires six months after the unit is purchased. No units were sold prior to October 31, 2003. As of January 31, 2005 the Company had sold 1,279,969 units for a total of $1,919,955, and 1,039,146 of the warrants were exercised for a total of $519,574. Of these amounts, 16,242 of the units were sold and 146,833 of the warrants were exercised during the three months ended January 31, 2005. In November 2004, the Company authorized through a private placement the sale of 2,000,000 equity units for $1.00 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of common stock for $.50, with an exercise period that expires six months after the unit is purchased. As of January 31, 2005, the Company has sold 251,150 units for a total of $251,150. No warrants have been exercised to date. On November 23, 2004, the Company entered into a private placement of the Company's common stock. Under terms of the agreement the Company sold 5,000,000 shares of stock in exchange for $5,000,000 in U.S. Treasury Bonds. A security agreement covering the bonds was subsequently granted another party incidental to a separate transaction. (See paragraph below). On November 23, 2004, the Company entered into an equity swap transaction with Cogent Capital Corporation (Cogent). Under terms of the agreement the Company paid Cogent $50,000 in cash, and agreed to pay an amount equal to the interest on $5 million, at LIBOR plus 1.25%, for the next 24 months. In addition, the Company agreed to pay Cogent an amount equal to the decrease in value of 4,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock below $1.00 per share, its fair market value at the date of the agreement. Cogent agreed to pay the Company an amount equal to the increase in value of 4,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock above $1.00 per share. The agreement is for 24 months, and the settlement between the Company and Cogent is to be paid in cash at the termination of the agreement. The Company's potential obligation under the swap transaction is secured with U.S. Treasury Bonds received in a private placement of the Company's stock (see paragraph above), including all interest earned on the bonds. The Company also received from Cogent a call option on 4,000,000 shares of Aegis' common stock. The option is callable only on November 23, 2006, for the market price on that date. 11 On December 22, 2004 the Company terminated the employment of its vice president. Under terms of the Company's stock option plan, options held by employees expire if not exercised prior to termination of employment. This employee did not exercise his option and his 1.25 million options expired on December 22, 2004. In December 2004, 770,000 shares of the Company's restricted common shares were issued to a consultant in exchange for a $77,000 note due in 90 days and future services totaling $ 693,000, based on $1.00 per share, which was the fair value of the Company's common stock on the date of issuance. In December 2004, the Company granted an option to acquire 500,000 shares of the Company's unrestricted common shares for $.10 a share to a consultant in exchange for future services totaling $825,000, based on $1.75 per share, which was the fair value of the Company's common stock on the date of issuance. The option was also exercised in December 2004 via a note for $50,000 payable 90 days from the date of issue. In January 2005, the Company granted an option to acquire 480,000 shares of the Company's unrestricted common shares for $.10 a share to a consultant in exchange for future services totaling $744,000, based on $1.65 per share, which was the fair value of the Company's common stock on the date of issuance. The option was also exercised in January 2005 via a note for $48,000 payable 90 days from the date of issue. In January 2005, the Company granted an option to acquire 115,000 shares of the Company's unrestricted common shares for $.13 a share to a consultant in exchange for future services totaling $169,050, based on $1.60 per share, which was the fair value of the Company's common stock on the date of issuance. In January 2005, the Company granted an option to acquire 103,500 shares of the Company's unrestricted common shares for $.13 a share to a consultant in exchange for future services totaling $133,515, based on $1.42 per share, which was the fair value of the Company's common stock on the date of issuance. In January 2005, a former consultant exercised his option to acquire 10,000 shares for $1.00 per share. In January 2005, 260,000 shares of the Company's restricted common shares were issued to consultants in exchange for future services totaling $ 260,000, based on $1.00 per share, which was the fair value of the Company's common stock on the date of issuance. 5. Lease Agreements In October 2003, the Company entered into a lease agreement for an industrial building. The lease had an initial term of eighteen months with an option to extend the lease for an additional six-month term thereafter. The monthly payment under the lease is $2,250. Upon execution of the lease the Company paid the first and last months lease payment and a security deposit of $7,000. The facility is used for product research and development. The Company arranged for an early termination of the lease and vacated the facility in February 2005. 12 On March 1, 2004 the Company moved its corporate headquarters to Scottsdale, Arizona. The Company signed a three-year lease calling for monthly payments of $4,963.13 beginning March 1, 2004. 6. Commitments and Contingencies Financial Results, Liquidity and Management's Plan (Unaudited) The Company has incurred net losses since its inception in January 2002 and has no established sources of revenue. Despite its negative cash flows from operations the Company has been able to obtain additional operating capital through private funding sources. Management's plans include the continued development of the Company's SafetyNet products and a client awareness program that it believes will enhance its ability to generate revenues from the sale of the Company's products. The Company has relied upon equity funding and loans from shareholders since inception. During the quarter ended January 31, 2005, the Company financed its operations through private equity funding and negligible revenues. No assurances can be given that the Company can obtain sufficient working capital through the sale of the Company's securities and borrowing, or that the sale of the SafetyNet products will generate sufficient revenues in the future to sustain ongoing operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. Preferred Stock From November 2002 through January 2003, the Company sold 18,020 shares of its Series A Preferred Stock (the "preferred stock"). A question arose as to the propriety of the Company's reliance upon a section of the Securities Act of 1933 that the preferred stock was exempt from registration. The potential consequence of the shares not being subject to the exemption created a right of rescission for each investor amounting to the total of their investment. As of October 31, 2003 all the preferred shareholders had exercised their right to convert their preferred shares into common shares. It is possible that their right of rescission may survive the conversion. However, no provision for this contingency has been made in the accompanying financial statements. Litigation In September 2003, the Company filed a complaint in California Superior Court against two former officers of the Company and a related company (the "defendants"), alleging fraud, deceit, conspiracy, breach of contract and seeking rescission of agreements made in April and August 2002 and the return of the cancelled stock certificates representing 1,000,000 cancelled shares of the Company's common stock. In a preliminary ruling, the court ordered that the disputed stock certificates be held at two brokerage firms until the matter is resolved. If the Company prevails in this action, the stock will be considered cancelled. Until the court resolves this matter, the shares are included in common shares outstanding although the Company's position is that the stock has been validly cancelled. The Company believed that if they brought suit against the defendants, a cross-complaint would be filed in retaliation. The defendants have filed an amended cross complaint alleging conversion, breach of duty to transfer securities, breach of contract, defamation, and unfair business practices. 13 The Company intends to vigorously prosecute its complaint and defend the cross-complaint. In the event of an unfavorable outcome of the defense against the cross-complaint, the award of damages to defendants could be material. The Company does not have director and officer insurance or some other form of insurance covering the period that gave rise to these events. The Company believes that the merits of its case are substantial and that the Company will prevail in the matter. If the Company prevails in the pending litigation, there is the potential of a contingent gain of an amount not to exceed $10,000 In May 2004, we entered into an exclusive distribution agreement with JAD Corporation of America to serve as our domestic distributor based on JAD's representations to us that it had sufficient resources, manpower and expertise to market the SafetyNet(TM) RadioBridge(TM) nationally. JAD's marketing efforts did not result in sales to end-users and we entered into discussions with JAD about reducing the size of the territory covered by the distribution agreement and amending other provisions of that agreement. On December 30, 2004 JAD notified the company that it intended to rescind the distribution agreement by filing a complaint against the company in Los Angeles County Superior Court, which included causes of action to terminate and rescind the distribution agreement, and for breach of contract. The principal of JAD, Joseph Dussich, also appeared as a plaintiff in a separate cause of action in the complaint to rescind and terminate his consulting agreement with the Company. There were also additional causes of action arising from the business relationship between the parties. The Company believes the case should be heard in Arizona and not California and has filed a motion to quash service of the complaint. We were also granted a protective order by the Los Angeles County Superior Court limiting discovery in the case to jurisdictional issues. The company further reserves the right to assert that the notices of termination were not in compliance with the respective agreements between the parties and were a negotiation tool to induce a modification of the agreements favorable to JAD and Dussich. In the interim, to mitigate any adverse consequences that may result from a termination of our relationship with JAD, we have begun negotiating agreements with new dealers and potential distributors that we believe will result in increased sales of our products to our end-users. 7. Subsequent Events In October 2003, through a private placement, the Company authorized the sale of 2,000,000 equity units for $1.50 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of common stock for $.50, with an exercise period that expires six months after the unit is purchased. No units were sold prior to October 31, 2003. As of March 21, 2005 the Company had sold 1,279,969 units for a total of $1,919,955; and 1,039,146 of the warrants were exercised for a total of $519,574. Of these amounts, 16,242 of the units were sold and 146,833 of the warrants were exercised during the three months ended January 31, 2005. In November 2004, the Company authorized through a private placement the sale of 2,000,000 equity units for $1.00 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase a share of common stock for $.50, with an exercise period that expires six months after the unit is purchased. As of March 21, 2005 the Company has sold 266,150 units for a total of $266,150. No warrants have been exercised to date. 14 ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS For a description of our significant accounting policies and an understanding of the significant factors that influenced our performance during the period ended January 31, 2005, this "Management's Discussion and Analysis" should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements, including the related notes, appearing in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report. The preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. There can be no assurance that actual results reported in the future will not differ from those estimates or that revisions of these estimates may not become necessary in the future. Forward Looking Statements This portion of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, includes statements that constitute "forward-looking statements." These forward-looking statements are often characterized by the terms "may," "believes," "projects," "expects," or "anticipates," and do not reflect historical facts. Specific forward-looking statements contained in this portion of the Quarterly Report include, but are not limited to the Company's (i) expectation that the private placement and related transactions will facilitate its attempt to obtain a listing of its common stock on the American Stock Exchange; (ii) expectation that it will begin generating significant revenues from the sale of its products rather than equity or debt financings; (iii) plan to allocate any funds it receives to expanding production capabilities, establishing a distribution channel for products, hiring additional personnel for a sales ramp-up, and meeting requirements to secure acceptance for listing its stock on the American Stock Exchange; (iv) belief that its client awareness program will enhance its ability to generate revenues from the sale of its products; and (v) belief that as a result of developments with the Department of Homeland Security, it will be easier to sell RadioBridge units to state and municipal public safety agencies. Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors and risks that could affect our results and achievements and cause them to materially differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to (i) market acceptance of our products; (ii) establishment and expansion of our direct and indirect distribution channels; (iii) attracting and retaining the endorsement of key opinion-leaders in the law enforcement, fire, rescue and other emergency response communities; (iv) the level of product technology and price competition for our products; (v) the degree and rate of growth of the markets in which we compete and the accompanying demand for our products; (vi) potential delays in international and domestic orders; (vii) risks associated with rapid technological change and execution and implementation risks of new technology; (viii) new product introduction risks; (ix) ramping manufacturing production to meet demand; (x) future potential litigation resulting from alleged product related injuries; (xi) potential fluctuations in quarterly operating results; (xii) financial and budgetary constraints of prospects and customers; (xiii) fluctuations in component pricing; (xiv) adoption of new or changes in accounting policies and practices, including pronouncements promulgated by standard setting bodies; (xv) changes in legislation and governmental regulation; and (xvi) publicity that may adversely impact our business and/or industry. 15 Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. factors and risks that could affect our results and achievements and cause them to materially differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements include those identified in the section titled "Risk Factors", as well as other factors that we are currently unable to identify or quantify, but that may exist in the future. In addition, the foregoing factors may affect generally our business, results of operations and financial position. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made. We do not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to update any forward-looking statements. Executive Overview. Through our SafetyNet(TM) line of products, we supply wireless security solutions to public safety agencies and commercial end users for homeland security and life safety applications. Our current product is the SafetyNet(TM) RadioBridge(TM), which allows most two-way radios to be interconnected regardless of the radio's frequency, modulation or encryption scheme. We have also modified and improved the technologies that comprised our Wireless Life Safety System (WLSS) and now anticipate marketing products using that technology under the name "SafetyNet(TM) Guardian(TM) System," which allows video transmissions and voice communications from the stairwells inside buildings for commercial safety applications. 16 RECENT TRENDS. The DHS has adopted new measures to expedite the flow of fund to equip, train and prepare first responders and local law enforcement to prevent incidents and to be ready should one occur. On December 3, 2004 the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced the recipients of $1.66 billion in grants to states and an additional $855 million in grants to urban areas to fund first responders and support state and local resources necessary to prevent, respond and recover from acts of terrorism and other disasters. The DHS also announced the implementation of a national strategy for homeland security that includes shared responsibility and accountability in equipping first responders with the resources they need to protect American citizens. The DHS cited the continuing maturation of its grants programs, streamlined distribution process and greater accountability measures as evidence that equipment necessary for first responders to mitigate acts of terrorism will be funded by the DHS. The DHS also announced that state and local jurisdictions can expect even more support in the coming months from the DHS. We believe these trends will make it easier for our public safety customers to purchase our products. According to recent announcements by the DHS, state and local governments may now have up to 120 days to draw down funds in advance of purchase and investments, as compared to the three to five days allowed previously, so that even small localities have the buying power to purchase expensive or backordered equipment. The DHS also has hosted training seminars and coordination calls with states and urban areas to ensure that they are coordinating to prevent delays in the funding flow. 17 Recent Developments In May 2004, we entered into an exclusive distribution agreement with JAD Corporation of America to serve as our domestic distributor based on JAD's representations to us that it had sufficient resources, manpower and expertise to market the SafetyNet RadioBridge nationally. JAD's marketing efforts did not result in sales to end-users and we entered into discussions with JAD about reducing the size of the territory covered by the distribution agreement and amending other provisions of that agreement. On December 30, 2004, JAD notified us that it intended to rescind the distribution agreement by filing a complaint against the Company in Los Angeles County Superior Court, which included causes of action to terminate and rescind the distribution agreement, and for breach of contract. JAD's principal, Joseph Dussich, also appeared as a plaintiff in a separate cause of action in the complaint to rescind and terminate his consulting agreement with the Company. There were also additional causes of action arising from the business relationship between the parties. We believe the case should be heard in Arizona and not California and have filed a motion to quash service of the complaint. We were also granted a protective order by the Los Angeles County Superior Court limiting discovery in the case to jurisdictional issues. We further reserved the right to assert that the notices of termination were not in compliance with the respective agreements between the parties and were a negotiation tool to induce a modification of the agreements favorable to JAD and Dussich. In July 2004 we began a production run of the first one hundred RadioBridge units at a third-party assembly facility located in Marysville, California. We are now shifting our RadioBridge(TM) production from Marysville, California to a larger manufacturer, CirTran Corporation, with manufacturing facilities in West Valley, Utah, in the greater Salt Lake City area. CirTran is a full-service electronics contract manufacturer and has an International Organization for Standardization or "ISO", 9002 registration. CirTran builds printed circuit board assemblies, cables, and plastic injection molding systems and has a 40,000 square foot facility capable of mass-production of our products with a high level of quality control and material management. 18 Sales and Marketing Progress To mitigate any adverse consequences that may result from a termination of our relationship with JAD, we have begun negotiating agreements with new dealers and potential distributors that we believe will result in increased sales of our products to our end-users. Additionally, we are currently in negotiations for a distribution agreement in the State of Arizona with an established radio products dealer with offices throughout the state. We believe establishing a dealer network is important to provide our end-users with customer support and to allow us to access existing distribution channels for commercial applications of the RadioBridge. We recently sold our RadioBridge to and entered into distribution agreements with the following parties: o WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc., located in Tampa, Florida for use by the United States Special Operations Command, or "USSOCOM." WinTec Arrowmaker provides a full range of services to USSOCOM and supports an assortment of Department of Defense organizations; o St. Augustine, Florida Fire Department; o Office for Domestic Preparedness, the principal component of the DHS responsible for preparing the United States for acts of terrorism, for further testing and evaluation; and o Fortis Networks, Inc., for Central America, which included an initial order for one RadioBridge. Fortis began its marketing activities in Panama and has demonstrated the RadioBridge to the Panamanian National Police. We are currently working with the United States Department of Commerce to obtain the appropriate authorizations to export our products to Mexico and Central America. We have also made the following marketing efforts: o On January 20, 2005, we demonstrated the RadioBridge to first responders at the Benicia Refinery at the Valero Refining Company; o On February 10, 2005, we demonstrated the RadioBridge to the San Manuel Indian Fire Department and the California Tribal National Emergency Management Council; a representative of the Federal Emergency Management Agency was also present; o On February 15, 2005, we demonstrated the RadioBridge to a regional co-operative in the greater Chicago area consisting of the Darien Police Department, Village of Burr Ridge Police Department, and Illinois Tri-State Fire Protection District; and o We are currently negotiating with major channel partners in Virginia and Arizona to establish a national distribution network for the RadioBridge in the United States to replace JAD. Results of Operations We have incurred losses since our inception in 2002 and have relied on the sale of our equity securities and on loans from our officers to fund our operations. Until very recently, we did not generate any revenues from operations. However, we have begun filling purchase orders for our Radio Bridge product and we are recording revenues. Revenues for the three month period ended January 31, 2005 were $6,000 compared to no revenues in the comparable period in 2004. This increase in revenue is due to the sale of a RadioBridge during the period. Our general and administrative expenses other than for related parties for the three month period ended January 31, 2005 were $3,350,751, as compared to $434,843 for the comparable period during the prior year. Our operating expenses have increased as a result of the costs of developing our products, hiring additional employees and contracting with outside consultants, who are usually compensated with equity. Now that we have a finished product ready for delivery to end-users, our marketing activities have increased significantly, and we are incurring increased marketing costs, including costs associated with demonstrating our products to public safety agencies and government officials, 19 major law enforcement officials, fire department officials, federal agencies, the United States Army, and potential commercial channel partners, including distributors, dealers and independent sales representatives. We have also incurred increased costs associated with the design, preparation, and printing of marketing and product informational material, courier costs and mailing costs. Moreover, we continue to incur legal and accounting expenses and other expenses incidental to our reporting obligations as a public company and to the increase in our requirements for transactional legal and accounting services. We did not have any consulting cost - related party expense for the three month period ended January 31, 2005, nor did we incur any such costs for the three-month period ended January 31, 2005. Our loss before provision for income taxes was $(3,349,251) for the three month period ended January 31, 2005, as compared to a loss of $(434,843) for the same period for the prior year. Our net loss for the three month period ended January 31, 2005 after provision for income taxes was $(3,349,251), as compared to a loss of $(434,843) for the comparable period for the prior year. The increase was the result of an increase in the number of employees and consultants, as well as increased office and operating expenses. Liquidity and Capital Resources At January 31, 2005, we had $164,014 in cash, as compared with $72,042 in cash during the equivalent period ended January 31, 2004. The increase is due to the sale of our equity in private placement transactions and revenues from the sale of our products. On November 23, 2004, we entered into a private placement of our common stock. Under terms of the agreement we sold 5,000,000 shares of stock in exchange for $5,000,000 in U.S. Treasury Bonds. 20 On November 23, 2004, we entered into an equity swap transaction with Cogent Capital Corporation (Cogent). Under terms of the agreement we paid Cogent $50,000 in cash, and agreed to pay an amount equal to the interest on $5,000,000, at LIBOR plus 1.25%, for the next 24 months. In addition, the Company agreed to pay Cogent an amount equal to the decrease in value of four million shares of our common stock below $1.25 per share, its fair market value at the date of the agreement. Cogent agreed to pay us an amount equal to the increase in value of 4,000,000 shares of our common stock above $1.25 per share. The agreement is for 24 months, and the settlement between the Company and Cogent is to be paid in cash at the termination of the agreement. The Company also received from Cogent a call option on four million shares of Aegis' common stock. The option is callable on November 23, 2006, for the market price on that date. We have the ability to borrow against the Treasury Bonds from lenders that agree to take a subordinate position to Cogent, which currently has a first position security interest on the Bonds. In November 2004, we borrowed $80,000 from one of our existing shareholders using the Bonds as collateral. At January 31, 2005 we had accrued payroll liability of $112,567, as compared with $210,608 at January 31, 2004. The decrease is attributed to paying down amounts due employees from prior periods. Accounts payable, deferred revenue and notes payable totaled $478,021 at January 31, 2005, as compared to $41,731 in accounts payable at January 31, 2004. This increase was due to increased costs of operations and the deferred revenue arising from transactions with JAD Corporation of America. We held property and equipment at January 31, 2005, which was valued, net of depreciation of $52,497, at $236,334, as compared with property valued, net of depreciation of $6,087, at $66,978 at January 31, 2004. The increase is attributed to the acquisition of components for our demonstration and production products and product models, as well as the acquisition of computer equipment, office equipment, and other assets necessary and incidental to our operations. Our total assets at January 31, 2005 were $5,839,997, as compared with $148,270 at January 31, 2004. We believe we have sufficient funds currently available to satisfy our cash requirements for the next six months. Our goal is to raise an additional $3,000,000 in equity financing during the next six months, to be allocated to expanding our production capabilities, establishing a distribution channel for our products and hiring additional personnel for our sales ramp-up. We also anticipate revenues from the sale of Radio Bridges during the next 12 months; however, because sales are dependent on establishing a dealer network and customer support infrastructure to support such sales, it is difficult to project a specific sales timeline. Going Concern Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States applicable to a going concern that contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. Our general business strategy is unproven, and we have just begun to record revenues. To date, we have relied solely on loans from shareholders and officers and the sale of our equity securities to fund our operations. We have incurred losses since our inception and we continue to incur legal, accounting, and other business and administrative expenses. Our auditor has therefore recognized that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. 21 Risk Factors An investment in our common stock involves a substantial degree of risk. Before making an investment decision, you should give careful consideration to the following risk factors in addition to the other information contained in this report. The following risk factors, however, may not reflect all of the risks associated with our business or an investment in our common stock only if you can afford to lose your entire investment. Risks Related to Our Business We have a limited operating history and there is no assurance that our company will achieve profitability. Until recently, we have had no significant operations or revenues with which to generate profits or sustain our projected operations. We have a very limited current operating history on which investors can evaluate our potential for future success. Our ability to generate revenue is uncertain and we may never achieve profitability. Potential investors should evaluate our company in light of the expenses, delays, uncertainties, and complications typically encountered by early-stage businesses, many of which will be beyond our control. These risks include: o lack of sufficient capital, o unproven business model, o marketing difficulties, o competition, and o uncertain market acceptance of our products and services. As a result of our limited operating history, our plan for growth, and the competitive nature of the markets in which we may compete, our historical financial data are of limited value in anticipating future revenue, capital requirements, and operating expenses. Our planned capital requirements and expense levels will be based in part on our expectations concerning capital investments and future revenue, which are difficult to forecast accurately due to our current stage of development. We may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected shortfall in revenue. Our product development, marketing and general administrative expenses may increase significantly if we begin to increase our sales and expand operations. To the extent that these expenses precede or are not rapidly followed by a corresponding and commensurate increase in revenue or additional sources of financing, our business, operating results, and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected. 22 We may need significant infusions of additional capital. To date, we have relied almost exclusively on outside financing to obtain the funding necessary to operate the business. Based upon our current cash reserves and forecasted operations, we may need to obtain additional outside funding in the future in order to further satisfy our cash requirements. Our need for additional capital to finance our business strategy, operations, and growth will be greater should, among other things, revenue or expense estimates prove to be incorrect. We cannot predict the timing or amount of our capital requirements at this time. If we fail to arrange for sufficient capital on a timely basis in the future, we may be required to reduce the scope of our business activities until we can obtain adequate financing. We may not be able to obtain additional financing in sufficient amounts or on acceptable terms when needed, which could adversely affect our operating results and prospects. Debt financing must be repaid regardless of whether or not we generate profits or cash flows from our business activities. Equity financing may result in dilution to existing shareholders and may involve securities that have rights, preferences, or privileges that are senior to our common stock. We may face significant competition, including from companies with greater resources, which could adversely affect our revenues, results of operations and financial condition. There are existing companies that offer or have the ability to develop products and services that will compete with those that we currently offer or may offer in the future. These include large, well-recognized companies that have substantial resources and established relationships in the markets in which we compete. Their greater financial, technical, marketing, and sales resources may permit them to react more quickly to emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements or to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, and sale of competing products and services. Emerging companies also may develop and offer products and services that compete with those that we offer. Increased competitive pressure could lead to reduced market share, as well as lower prices and reduced margins for our products, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully in the future. We depend materially upon acceptance of our products by specific agencies and markets and if these agencies and markets do not purchase or are not receptive to our products, our revenues will be adversely affected and we may not be able to expand into other markets. Our business and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected if a substantial number of law enforcement, fire, rescue, other emergency response and public safety agencies, as well as commercial end users for homeland security and life safety applications, do not purchase our SafetyNet(TM) products. In addition, we may not be able to expand sales of our products into other markets if our products are not widely accepted by these agencies or markets. This also would have an adverse affect on our business and results of operations. Our growth prospects will be diminished if our SafetyNet products are not widely accepted. We have generated minimal revenue to date from the sale of our SafetyNet products. Until recently, our funding came primarily from the sale of our equity and debt securities. However, we expect to generate greater revenues from the sale of our SafetyNet products. We expect to depend on sales of these products, primarily the SafetyNet Radio Bridge, for the foreseeable future. A decrease in the prices of or demand for these product lines, or their failure to achieve broad market acceptance, would significantly harm our growth prospects, operating results and financial condition. 23 If we are unable to manage our projected growth, our growth prospects may be limited and our future profitability may be adversely affected. We expect our business to grow in the near future. Rapid expansion may strain our current managerial, financial, operational, and other resources. If we are unable to manage our growth, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected. We will need to continually improve our operations and our financial, accounting, and other internal control systems in order to manage our growth effectively. Any failure to do so may lead to inefficiencies and redundancies, and result in reduced growth prospects and profitability. We may face personal injury and other liability claims that could harm our reputation and adversely affect our sales and financial condition. Our products will be depended upon in emergency, rescue and public safety situations that may involve physical harm or even death to individuals, as well as potential loss or damage to real and personal property. Our products may be associated with these injuries or other losses. A person who sustains injuries, the survivors of a person killed, the owner of damaged or destroyed property in a situation involving the use of our products, or the owner of a facility at which such injury, death or loss occurred may bring legal action against us to recover damages on the basis of theories including personal injury, wrongful death, negligent design, dangerous product or inadequate warning. We may also be subject to lawsuits involving allegations of misuse of our products. If successful, such claims could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. Significant litigation could also result in a diversion of management's attention and resources, negative publicity and an award of monetary damages in excess of our insurance coverage. Our future success will depend on our ability to expand sales through distributors, dealers, and independent sales representatives and our inability to take advantage of our existing distribution network or recruit new distributors, dealers, or independent sales representatives would negatively affect our sales. Our distribution strategy is to pursue sales through multiple channels with an emphasis on independent distributors, dealers, and sales representatives. We are in litigation with JAD Corporation of America, our original distributor, and both we and JAD clearly wish to terminate that relationship. Although we are now negotiating agreements with new potential dealers and distributors, and have entered into a distribution agreement for Central America, the distributors' inability to successfully sell our products or our inability to retain other distributors, dealers, and sales representatives who can successfully sell our products would adversely affect our sales. In addition, if we do not competitively price our products, meet the requirements of our current distributor or end-users, provide adequate marketing support, or comply with the terms of our distribution arrangement, a distributor may fail to aggressively market our products or may terminate its relationship with us. These developments would likely have a material adverse effect on our sales. Our reliance on others to sell our products also makes it more difficult to predict our revenues, cash flow and operating results. 24 We expend significant resources in anticipation of a sale due to our lengthy sales cycle and may receive no revenue in return. Generally, law enforcement, fire, rescue, other emergency response and public safety agencies, as well as commercial end users for homeland security and life safety applications consider a wide range of issues before committing to purchase our products, including product benefits, training costs, the cost to use our products in addition to or in place of other products, product reliability and budget constraints. The length of our sales cycle may range from a few weeks to as long as several years. We may incur substantial selling costs and expend significant effort in connection with the evaluation of our products by potential customers before they place an order. If these potential customers do not purchase our products, we will have expended significant resources and received no revenue in return. This could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. Many of our end-users are subject to budgetary and political constraints that may delay or prevent sales. Many of our end-user customers currently are military, government agencies or entities or para-military or quasi-government entities or agencies. These entities and agencies often do not set their own budgets and therefore have little control over the amount of money they can spend. In addition, these entities and agencies experience political pressure that may dictate the manner in which they spend money. As a result, even if an entity or agency wants to acquire our products, it may be unable to purchase them due to budgetary or political constraints. Some orders also may be canceled or substantially delayed due to budgetary, political or other scheduling delays that frequently occur in connection with the acquisition of products by such entities or agencies. Many of our end-users rely on state and federal grants to obtain the necessary funding to purchase our products, the delay or unavailability of which could adversely affect our sales and results of operations. The Department of Homeland Security currently awards funding grants for the purchase of communications equipment that provides interoperability to first responders. These funds are granted through the State Homeland Security Grant Program, the Urban Area Security Initiative, and other grants administered by the Office of Domestic Preparedness, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the Transportation Security Administration. Other Federal agency programs include Department of Justice grants for counter-terrorism and general-purpose law enforcement activities through the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, which distributes funding through a wide range of programs, both as grants and cooperative agreements. Additionally, many grants are administered directly through state agencies and administrative offices. Budgetary, political or other constraints or delays in providing or the availability of funding through these grant programs could preclude many of our end-users from being able to purchase our products, which would have an adverse impact on our revenues, results of operations and financial condition. 25 If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, we may lose a competitive advantage or incur substantial litigation costs to protect our rights. Our success depends both on our internally developed technology and our third party technology. We rely on a variety of trademarks, service marks, and designs to promote our brand names and identity. We also rely on a combination of provisional patents, contractual provisions, confidentiality procedures, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrecy, unfair competition, and other intellectual property laws to protect the proprietary aspects of our products. The steps we take to protect our intellectual property rights may not be adequate to protect our intellectual property and may not prevent our competitors from gaining access to our intellectual property and proprietary information. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that courts will always uphold our intellectual property rights or enforce the contractual arrangements that we have entered into to protect our proprietary technology. Third parties may infringe or misappropriate our copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade dress, and other proprietary rights. Any such infringement or misappropriation could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, the relationship between regulations governing domain names and laws protecting trademarks and similar proprietary rights is unclear. We may decide to initiate litigation in order to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, or to determine the validity and scope of our proprietary rights. Any such litigation could result in substantial expense, may reduce our profits, and may not adequately protect our intellectual property rights. In addition, we may be exposed to future litigation by third parties based on claims that our products or services infringe their intellectual property rights. Any such claim or litigation against us, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and harm our reputation. In addition, such claims or litigation could force us to do one or more of the following: o cease selling or using any of our products that incorporate the challenged intellectual property, which would adversely affect our revenue; o obtain a license from and/or make royalty payments to the holder of the intellectual property right alleged to have been infringed, which license may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all; o divert management's attention from our business; o redesign or, in the case of trademark claims, rename our products or services to avoid infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties, which may not be possible and in any event could be costly and time-consuming. o Even if we were to prevail, such claims or litigation could be time-consuming and expensive to prosecute or defend, and could result in the diversion of our management's time and attention. These expenses and diversion of managerial resources could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations. Defects in our products could reduce demand for our products and result in a loss of sales, delay in market acceptance and injury to our reputation. Complex components and assemblies used in our products may contain undetected defects that are subsequently discovered at any point in the life of the product. Defects in our products may result in a loss of sales, delay in market acceptance, injury to our reputation, increased warranty costs, recalls and costs associated with such recall efforts. In addition, defects in our products could result in personal injuries or death, as well as significant property damage. Any of these events could have a material adverse affect on our revenues, results of operations and financial condition. 26 Component shortages could result in our inability to produce sufficient volume to adequately sustain customer demand. This could result in a loss of sales, delay in deliveries and injury to our reputation. Components used in the manufacture of our products may become unavailable or may be discontinued. Delays caused by industry allocations, or obsolescence may take weeks or months to resolve. In some cases, parts obsolescence may require a product re-design to ensure quality replacement parts. These delays could cause significant delays in manufacturing and loss of sales, leading to adverse effects significantly impacting our financial condition. Our revenues and operating results may fluctuate unexpectedly from quarter to quarter, which may cause our stock price to decline. Our revenues and operating results may vary significantly in the future due to various factors, including, but not limited to increased sales, increased raw material expenses, changes in our operating expenses, market acceptance of our products and services, regulatory changes that may affect the marketability of our products, and budgetary cycles of our targeted customer base. As a result of these and other factors, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful in the short term and that you should not rely upon our performance in a particular period as indicating of our performance in any future period. We depend upon our executive officers and key personnel. Our performance depends substantially on the performance of our executive officers and other key personnel. The success of our business in the future will depend on our ability to attract, train, retain and motivate high quality personnel, especially highly qualified technical and managerial personnel. The loss of services of any executive officers or key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, revenues, results of operations or financial condition. We maintain key person life insurance on the lives of our CEO and President. Competition for talented personnel is intense, and there is no assurance that we will be able to continue to attract, train, retain or motivate other highly qualified technical and managerial personnel in the future. In addition, market conditions may require us to pay higher compensation to qualified management and technical personnel than we currently anticipate. Any inability to attract and retain qualified management and technical personnel in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations. We may face risks as we expand our business into international markets. We currently are exploring opportunities to offer our products in foreign markets. We have limited experience in developing and marketing our services internationally, and we may not be able to successfully execute our business model in markets outside the United States. We will face a number of risks inherent in doing business in international markets, including the following: 27 o changing regulatory requirements; o fluctuations in the exchange rate for the United States dollar; o the availability of export licenses; o unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; o potentially adverse tax consequences; o political and economic instability; o changes in diplomatic and trade relationships; o difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations, tariffs and other trade barriers; o complex foreign laws and treaties; o changing economic conditions; o difficulty of collecting foreign account receivables; o exposure to different legal standards, particularly with respect to intellectual property and distribution of products; In addition, we would be subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which prohibits us from making payments to government officials and others in order to influence the granting of contracts we may be seeking. Our non-U.S. competitors are not subject to this law and this may give them a competitive advantage over us. To the extent that international operations represent a significant portion of our business in the future, our business could suffer if any of these risks occur. Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock price. As disclosed in our prior filings we intend to change our fiscal year from July 31 to June 30. Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, beginning with our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007, we will be required to furnish a report by our management on our internal control over financial reporting. The internal control report must contain (i) a statement of management's responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, (ii) a statement identifying the framework used by management to conduct the required evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, (iii) management's assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of our most recent fiscal year, including a statement as to whether or not internal control over financial reporting is effective, and (iv) a statement that the Company's independent auditors have issued an attestation report on management's assessment of internal control over financial reporting. In order to achieve compliance with Section 404 of the Act within the prescribed period, we will need to engage in a process to document and evaluate our internal control over financial reporting, which will be both costly and challenging. In this regard, management will need to dedicate internal resources, engage outside consultants and adopt a detailed work plan to (i) assess and document the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting, (ii) take steps to improve control processes where appropriate, (iii) validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented and (iv) implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial reporting. We can provide no assurance as to our, or our independent auditors', conclusions at the prescribed periods with respect to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Act. There is a risk that neither we nor our independent auditors will be able to conclude at the prescribed period that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective as required by Section 404 of the Act. 28 During the course of our testing we may identify deficiencies which we may not be able to remediate in time to meet the deadline imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for compliance with the requirements of Section 404. In addition, if we fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Moreover, effective internal controls, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to helping prevent financial fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our stock could drop significantly. Risks Related to Our Securities Stock prices of technology companies have declined precipitously at times in the past and the trading price of our common stock is likely to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses to investors. The trading price of our common stock has risen and fallen significantly over the past few months and could continue to be volatile in response to factors including the following, many of which are beyond our control: o variations in our operating results; o announcements of technological innovations or new services by us or our competitors; o changes in expectations of our future financial performance, including financial estimates by securities analysts and investors; o our failure to meet analysts' expectations; o changes in operating and stock price performance of other technology companies similar to us; o conditions or trends in the technology industry; o additions or departures of key personnel; and o future sales of our common stock. Domestic and international stock markets often experience significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of companies with securities trading in those markets. These fluctuations, as well as political events, terrorist attacks, threatened or actual war, and general economic conditions unrelated to our performance, may adversely affect the price of our common stock. In the past, securities holders of other companies often have initiated securities class action litigation against those companies following periods of volatility in the market price of those companies' securities. If the market price of our stock fluctuates and our stockholders initiate this type of litigation, we could incur substantial costs and experience a diversion of our management's attention and resources, regardless of the outcome. This could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations. 29 Provisions in our corporate charter and under Delaware law are favorable to our directors. Pursuant to our certificate of incorporation, members of our management and board of directors will have no liability for violations of their fiduciary duty of care as officers and directors, except in limited circumstances. This means that you may be unable to prevail in a legal action against our officers or directors even if you believe they have breached their fiduciary duty of care. In addition, our certificate of incorporation allows us to indemnify our officers and directors from and against any and all expenses or liabilities arising from or in connection with their serving in such capacities with us. This means that if you were able to enforce an action against our directors or officers, in all likelihood we would be required to pay any expenses they incurred in defending the lawsuit and any judgment or settlement they otherwise would be required to pay. Certain provisions of Delaware General Corporation Law and in our charter, as well as our current stockholder base may prevent or delay a change of control of our company. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, which we are subject to, it will be more difficult for a third party to take control of our company and may limit the price some investors are willing to pay for shares of our common stock. Furthermore, our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of preferred stock without a vote or other stockholder approval. Finally, a majority of our outstanding common stock is held by insiders. Without a disparate stockholder base or a fluid aggregation of stockholders, it will be more difficult for a third-party to acquire our company without the consent of the insiders. Our common stock may be subject to the "penny stock" rules as promulgated under the Exchange Act. In the event that no exclusion from the definition of "penny stock" under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended is available, then any broker engaging in a transaction in our company's common stock will be required to provide its customers with a risk disclosure document, disclosure of market quotations, if any, disclosure of the compensation of the broker-dealer and its sales person in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market values of our company's securities held in the customer's accounts. The bid and offer quotation and compensation information must be provided prior to effecting the transaction and must be contained on the customer's confirmation of sale. Certain brokers are less willing to engage in transactions involving "penny stocks" as a result of the additional disclosure requirements described above, which may make it more difficult for holders of our company's common stock to dispose of their shares. ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with an objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, such as this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Disclosure controls also are designed with an objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, in order to allow timely consideration regarding required disclosures. 30 The evaluation of our disclosure controls by our principal executive officer and principal financial officer included a review of the controls' objectives and design, the operation of the controls, and the effect of the controls on the information presented in this Quarterly Report. Our management, including our chief executive officer, chief operating officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that disclosure controls can or will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud, if any. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Also, projections of any evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures to future periods are subject to the risk that the disclosure controls and procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Based on their review and evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-QSB, and subject to the inherent limitations described above, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. They are not aware of any significant changes in our disclosure controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. During the period covered by this Form 10-QSB, there have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. PART II - OTHER INFORMATION Items 3-5 are not applicable and have been omitted. ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. In May 2004, we entered into an exclusive distribution agreement with JAD Corporation of America to serve as our domestic distributor based on JAD's representations to us that it had sufficient resources, manpower and expertise to market the RadioBridge(TM) product nationally. JAD's marketing efforts did not result in sales to end-users and we entered into discussions with JAD about reducing the size of the territory covered by the distribution agreement and amending other provisions of that agreement. On December 30, 2004, JAD notified us that it intended to rescind the distribution agreement by filing a complaint against us in Los Angeles County Superior Court, which included causes of action to terminate and rescind the distribution agreement, and for breach of contract. JAD's principal, Joseph Dussich, also appeared as a plaintiff in a separate cause of action in the complaint to rescind and terminate his consulting agreement with the Company. There were also additional causes of action arising from the business relationship between the parties. The company believes the case should be heard in Arizona and not California. We have filed a motion to quash service of the complaint. We were also granted a protective order by the Los Angeles County Superior Court limiting discovery in the case to jurisdictional issues. 31 We further reserved the right to assert that the notices of termination were not in compliance with the respective agreements between the parties and were a negotiation tool to induce a modification of the agreements favorable to JAD and Dussich. The litigation against Eric Peacock and Vernon Briggs III, and their cross-complaint in Orange County Superior Court has been stayed pending the retirement from the military of our co-founder and former director, Master Sergeant Joseph King; and a trial date has been set for February 2006. We plan to vigorously pursue our claims against the defendants when the stay is lifted. Other than as described above and in our previously filed Quarterly Reports and Annual Reports, we know of no material, active or pending legal proceedings against us, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceedings or pending litigation. Other than as described above and in our previously filed Annual Report, there are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest. ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES. We are continuing to raise funds for operations through a private placement of our equity securities. Proceeds from the issuance of 267,392 shares of common stock during the three month period ended January 31, 2005 totaled $275,514.26, with an additional $73,416.50 in proceeds raised from the exercise of 146,833 warrants. The common stock was offered and sold in a private placement, pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506 of Regulation D. The common stock was offered and sold to purchasers whom the company or its authorized agents believe are "accredited investors," as that term is defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D in reliance upon an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act in a transaction not involving any public offering. Each of the investors represented to Aegis that: o such investor is an "accredited investor"; o the shares of common stock were purchased by such investor for its own account, for investment and without any view to the distribution, assignment or resale to others other than pursuant to a registered offering; o such investor understood that the shares of common stock issued to the investor have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 or any state securities laws; and o such investor acknowledged that it may not transfer the shares unless the shares are registered under Federal and applicable state securities laws or unless, in the opinion of counsel satisfactory to Aegis, an exemption from such laws is available. 32 We will arrange for the certificates representing such securities to be legended and subject to stop transfer restrictions. We did not engage in any form of general solicitation or general advertising in connection with these issuances. On November 23, 2004, we entered into common stock subscription agreements with four accredited investors: Potente Capital, Inc., Ellenallhatatlan, Inc., Nieodparty Inc., and Krachtig Inc., each of which is a Delaware corporation. Pursuant to these subscription agreements, each accredited investor acquired 1,250,000 shares of Aegis' common stock in an unregistered private placement. In exchange, Aegis received payment in a United States Treasury Note and stripped interest security ("Bonds") with an aggregate value of $5,000,000. This private placement is the first in a series of related concurrent transactions that are intended to facilitate Aegis' attempt to obtain a listing for its common stock on the American Stock Exchange. These related and concurrent transactions are among and between Aegis, the investors, Cogent Capital Corp., the party that facilitated the private placement and Investors Bank & Trust Company, which is serving as escrow agent in the transactions pursuant to an Escrow Agreement which the parties entered into in connection with the arrangements specified herein. The Escrow Agreement provides that Investors Bank & Trust acted as the escrow agent in the private placement transaction, and further provides that the Bonds, the private placement stock and the cash premium of $50,000 were to be deposited with the escrow agent at the closing. Additionally, the agreement specified that the Bonds will be held in an account at Investors Bank & Trust after the closing. Concurrently with the execution and acceptance of the subscription agreements by Aegis, the Registrant purchased from Cogent a call option for $1, which entitles Aegis to repurchase 80% of the shares of common stock it sold in the private placement at the then current market price. The option expires in two years and may only be exercised on the expiration date. Also concurrent with the private placement, Aegis entered into an equity swap arrangement with Cogent that entitles Aegis to receive or obligates Aegis to pay the price return on 80% of the shares issued in the private placement based upon a base price of $1.00 per share in two years, or sooner if the shares are registered for sale under the Securities Act of 1933. Aegis paid a premium of $50,000 to enter into this contract and secured the transaction by placing the $5 million of Bonds in a collateral account. These securities are restricted from being used during the contract period but may be borrowed against, as specified below. The Bonds will serve as collateral in this equity swap transaction with Cogent Capital Corp. These Bonds will remain in this collateral account for two years and can be used with a call option that Aegis may exercise. At the end of this two year period, assuming Aegis' stock price has not declined below the value as of the date the transaction closed, the Bonds would be released from the collateral account and made available to Aegis for working capital purposes. In the interim, while the Bonds reside in the collateral account, Aegis may borrow against the value of the bonds from a party that is willing to take a subordinate position to Cogent Capital Corp. In order to facilitate and memorialize these transactions, Aegis and Cogent also entered into the standard form International Swaps and Derivative Association, Inc. ("ISDA") ISDA 2002 Master Agreement & Schedule and ISDA 1994 Credit Support Annex. 33 The equity swap agreement also provides that Aegis and Cogent Capital will exchange certain defined cash flows. Under terms of the agreement, Aegis will periodically pay Cogent interest on the value of Aegis' Bond account (the interest rate will be LIBOR + 1.25%) and an amount equal to the decrease in Aegis' stock price over the price at closing times 80% of the number of shares included in the private placement specified above. Similarly, Cogent agreed to pay Aegis, periodically, an amount equal to the increase in Aegis' stock price over the price at closing times 80% of the number of shares included in the private placement specified above. Both parties agreed that any required payment resulting from the increase or decrease of Aegis' stock price as of a measurement date will be made in the form of Bonds similar to those already in Aegis' account with Investors Bank & Trust. Aegis's Bond account will be subject to a security agreement executed in favor of Cogent. However, Cogent agrees and understands that Aegis will hold title to the bonds at all times. Aegis may, and in fact intends to, secure borrowing against the bond account, provided such borrowing is subordinate to Cogent's security interest. This agreement will commence at the date of closing and will continue for a period of 24 months, at which point Cogent's security interest in Aegis' bond account will expire. The common stock was offered and sold in a private placement, pursuant to the o provisions of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 506 of Regulation D. The common stock was offered and sold to purchasers whom the company or its authorized agents believe are "accredited investors," as that term is defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D in reliance upon an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act in a transaction not involving any public offering. Each of the investors represented to Aegis that: o such investor is an "accredited investor"; o the shares of common stock were purchased by such investor for its own account, for investment and without any view to the distribution, assignment or resale to others other than pursuant to a registered offering; o such investor understood that the shares of common stock issued to the investor have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 or any state securities laws; and o such investor acknowledged that it may not transfer the shares unless the shares are registered under Federal and applicable state securities laws or unless, in the opinion of counsel satisfactory to Aegis, an exemption from such laws is available. Aegis will arrange for the certificates representing such securities to be legended and subject to stop transfer restrictions. Aegis did not engage in any form of general solicitation or general advertising in connection with these issuances. 34 ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. (a) The following exhibits are attached to this Quarterly Report: Exhibit Number Description ------- ----------- 10.1 ISDA Credit Support Annex 10.2 ISDA 2002 Master Agreement 10.3 ISDA Schedule to 2002 Master Agreement 10.4 Equity Option Transaction 10.5 Equity Swap Transaction 31 Certification pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 32 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (b) The company filed two Current Reports on Form 8-K during the period ended January 31, 2005. On November 1, 2004, the company filed a report announcing the change in its fiscal year from year-end July 31 to year-end June 30. On November 30, 2004, the company filed a current report announcing the sale of unregistered equity securitites and entry into common stock subscription agreements with four accredited investors. SIGNATURES In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. AEGIS ASSESSMENTS, INC. Date: March 18, 2005 /s/ David Smith ------------------------------------- Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Authorized Officer) 35 EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit Number Description -------------- ----------- 10.1 ISDA Credit Support Annex 10.2 ISDA 2002 Master Agreement 10.3 ISDA Schedule to 2002 Master Agreement 10.4 Equity Option Transaction 10.5 Equity Swap Transaction 31 Certification pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 32 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 36